Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-53.-6-6 OFFICE LOCATION: ®� SO MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex ~ ® P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold,NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Telephone: 631765-1935 Southold, NY 11971 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry,AICP Assistant Town Planning Director LWRP Coordinator Date July 25, 2022 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for ZBA File Ref DOUGLAS BRADFORD #7691 SCTM# 1000-53-6-6 DOUGLAS BRADFORD #7691 —Request for Variances from Article XXIII, Section 280-124; and the Building Inspector's May 6, 2022 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to demolish(as per Town Code definition) and reconstruct a single family dwelling; at; 1) located less than the code required minimum side yard setback of 10 feet; 2) located less than the code required minimum combined side yard setback of 25 feet; 3)more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage'of 20%; located at: 3705 Bay Shore Road(Adj. to Shelter Island Sound), Greenport, NY. SCTM No. 1000-53-6-6. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP)Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me,the proposal is recommended as INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. The lot coverage exceeding 20 percent is recommended as INCONSISTENT with Policy 1 and 4 of the LWRP. The parcel will be affected by category 1 and 2 hurricane storm surge. The 2nd-floor addition is recommended as Exempt. Pursuant to Chapter 268,the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: John Burke,Assistant Town Attorney BOARD MEMBERSSOF $®� Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson Ty053095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 !O Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes N Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. • COQ 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas PlanamentoCOUffm Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov R E Cr I V E D ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS e TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JUN 2 3 2022 Tel.(631)765-1809 •Fax(631)765-9064 Sout 0 Town Planning Board June 22, 2022 Mark Terry, Assistant Town Planning Director LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold,NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. # 7691 BRADFORD, Douglas Dear Mark: We have received an application to demolish (as per Town Code) and reconstruct a single family dwelling. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map, project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-5D is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman Chairp on By: Encls Survey/Site Plan Peter A. Grogen Date : November 23, 2021 e FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD,N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE:May 6,2022 TO: AMP Architecture(Bradford) 1075 Franklinville Rd Laurel,NY 11948 Please take notice that your application dated March 9,2022: For permit to: demoli§h(as per Town Code definition)`and reconstruct a.single-family dwelling at: Location of property: 3705 Bay Shore,Road-Greenport.NY County Tax Map No. 1000-Section 53 Block 6 Lot 16 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed dwelling on this nonconforming 7.396 sq.`l}. lot in the-R-40 District is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII Section 280-124.-which states lots measuring less than 20.000 square feet'in total size reiluiie a ininimum side.yard setback of'10 feet and a combined sideyar&setback of25.feetand.a maximum lot,coverage of 20%.. The proposed construction will have-a minimum side-yard setback of 6.5 feet and a-combined side Yard setback of 13.7 feet with lot coverage.at 23.6%. Authorized Signature Note to Applicant:Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file,Z.B.A. Fee:$ Filed By: Assignment No. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE House No. 3705 Street Bayshore Rd Hamlet17 Greenport SCTM 1000 Section 53 Block 6 Lot(s) 16 Lot Size 7,396 sf Zone R-40 NC I(WE)APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING 2 sPECTOR DATED 5/6/22 BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 3/9/22 Owner(s): Douglas Bradford MailingAddress: 3705 Bayshore Rd GreenportNY 11944 Telephone: 914-557-9097 Fax: Email: greenmen@verizon.net NOTE:In addition to the above,please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agent,architect, builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative:AMP Architecture for(X) Owner( )Other: Address: 10200 Main Rd Unit 3A Mattituck NY Telephone:631-603-9092 Fax: Email:imagee@amparchitect.com Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to,from the above names: ( )Applicant/Owner(s), (X)Authorized Representative, ( ) Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 3/9/22 and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 5/6/22 FOR: (X)Building Permit ( )Certificate of Occupancy ( )Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ( ) Change of Use ( )Permit for As-Built Construction ( ) Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article,Section,Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers.Do not quote the code.) Article: XXlII Section: 280 Subsection: 124 Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: (X)A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( )A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law- Section 280-A. ( )Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ( )Reversal or Other A prior appeal(Xj has ( )has not been made at any time with respect to this property,UNDER Appeal No(s).#d�25z�640, 497 Year(s). 1963,1964,72-001,2021 .(Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our officefor assistance) Name of Owner: ZBA File# REASONS FOR APPEAL (Please be specific, additional sheets maybe used with preparer's signature notarized): 1.An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted,because: THE PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR DORMERS AND PROPOSED PORCH ARE BOTH WITHIN THE DOMINANT CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. 2.The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance,because: THE EXISITING BUILDING DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED 75'REAR SET BACK, 15'SIDE SITE BACK AND lo'SITE SET BACK. 3.The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: THE EXISITNG IS ALREADY NONCONFORMING.OUR PROPSED BUILDING AREA IS ONLY INCREASING BY 545 SF. 4.The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT BE DIRECTLY RIAPACTING THE ENVIRONMENT CONDITIONS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD,IT CONFORMS WITH WHAT IS ALREADY EXISTTNG. 5.Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? { }Yes,or]K}No Why: THE BACK AND BOTH SIDE YARD SETBACKS ARE EXISTING NONCONFORMING. Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land? X1 No {}Yes(please furnish a copy) This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate,and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the communi Sib a oLApplicant thorized Agent (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) Sworn to before me this /0 day of 20 t C-° otary Public � BARBARA H.TANDY Notary Publioi State Of New York No.-01 TA6066009 Qualified In'$uffolk County Commission Expires 09/13/20�� APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT• AMP Architecture DATE PREPARED: 1.For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: N/A II.New Construction Areas (New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: 18.3 X 6.8 (OVER EXISTING PORCH) Dimensions of new second floor: 36.2 x 8.4, 11.9 x 1.8, 10.7 x 1.8 Dimensions of floor above second level: N/A Height(from finished ground to top of ridge): 29.8' Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed?If yes,please provide height(above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: N/A III.Proposed Construction Description(Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary).Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: 2 STORY WOOD FRAME DWELLING WITH 4 BEDROOMS. Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: 2 STORY WOOD FRAME DWELLING WITH 4 BEDROOMS.PROPOSED SECOND STORY DORMERS AND PROPOSED COVERED PROCH. PROPOSED FIRST STORY ADDITION. IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage(from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: 1,683 SF Proposed increase of building coverage: 546 SF Square footage of your lot: 7,396 SF Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: 23.6% V.Purpose of New Construction: PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR DORMERS,PROPSED FIRST FLOOR ADDITION(BUILDING OUT WHERE EXISITNG PORCH IS)AND PROPOSED COVERED PORCH VI.Please describe the land contours(flat,slope %, heavily wooded,marsh area,etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): THE LAND IS FLAT Please submit 8 sets of photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction,and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes X No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? No X Yes please explain on attached sheet. C. 1.)Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? NO 2.) Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? N/A 3.) Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? YES 4.) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? YES Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: FILING WMITR17STEES and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? NO E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers,bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting? NO Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? NO If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking, please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? NO If yes,please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. L Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE and the proposed use SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH COVERED PORCH (ex: existing single family,proposed: same with garage, pool or other) ,cQ "0&4t� 6/10/21 Authorized iffignature and Date FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No. .Z..2,1$............ Date ................... .March.... ..3........... .. 19.6 .. THIS CERTIFIES that the building located at +D...R ......................... Street pfo . "All Peckoc�coge may .......... Lot No. b.6..........Gauer`sport.)...N.1.............. .... conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated ....................................X; vel*bv..3 1. •, 1963.... pursuant to which Building Permit No. .. 53-Z dated Kov.....19.th..1963...&..aJ?11tiAn.P419......... was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ........ ...Private..one-family..air.elling. ............................................................................................ The certificate is issued to .... hOtLAS...LLggis............ .Omar....................................................... (owner, lessee or tenant) of the aforesaid building. ........................ .Building ]nsActor....................,.... FORM N0. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: Z-29788 Date: 10/23/03 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ADDITION AND ALTERATION Location of Property: 3705 BAY SHORE RD GREENPORT (HOUSE NO.) (STREET) (HAMLET) County Tax Map No. 473889 Section 53 Block 6 Lot 16 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No_ conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated AUGUST 29, 2001 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 27601-Z dated SEPTEMBER 10, 2001 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is FRONT AND REAR COVERED PORCH ADDITIONS, SECOND STORY BALCONY AND ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING ONE FAMILY DWELLING AS APPLIED FOR PER ZBA#4971 DATED 7/12/01. The certificate is issued to DOUGLAS BRADFORD (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EEALTH APPROVAL N/A ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO_ 1100696 12/05/02 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED 07/31/02 PERFECTION PLUMBING Authorized Si I ature Rev. 1/81 LIWI.O.; THOMAS (lzf,qev 4622 . 14.± L7 . 46 Somerset Drive .-Dec..._5, 1963 Great Neck, new-York Page 6. Rocessed to December 19, 1963 Tory buijding into a .one family dwelling on lot 'E�$ 8ay Shore Road, Greenport,. New._ York. TOWN OF SOUTHOW, NEW YORK ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD 'OF APPEALS DATE December 19, 1963 Appeal No. 622 Dated November 19, 1963 ACTION OF TAE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Charles Bumble, a/c Thomas Liggis To Greenport, N.Y. 46 Somerset Drive Appellant Great Neck, New York It a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on Thursday, December 19, 1963 the appeal was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your Request for variance due to lack of access to property ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance (X) Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance 1. SPEGIAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a special exception ( ) be granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article .__._..__..__... Section ._ _. ...._.__. Subsection paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance, and the decision of the, Building Inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) be confirmed because 8:30 P.M. (E.S.T. ) , upon application of Charles Bumble, a/c Thomas Liggis, 46 Somerset Drive, Great Neck, New York, for a variance in accord- ance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 1, and Sections 303 and 307, and Article X, Section 1000A, for permission to convert an accessory building into a one family dwelling on a lot with a frontage of 50 feet, insufficient area and insufficient side yards , and leave a lot with a frontage of 50 feet and insufficient area. Location of property: east side shore Road, Greenport, New York, Lot 66 on map of Peconic Bay Estates, bounded north by Frank F. Csajko, east by Peconic Bay south b James Rosati, and west by Bay Shore Roa . 2. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would)(would not) produce practical difficulties or unnec- essary hardship because SEE REVERSE (b) the bardthip created (is) .(is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike is the imnledlate vicinity of this property and In the same use district because SEE REVERSE (c) The var'aaice (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) (would not) change .the .character of the district because SEE REVERSE and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( ) be denied and that the previous decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed. W(G)L'tpY 'ING BOARD OF APPEALS FaRna zB4 � Ima Z�s�,cQct,�.�• Judith T. Boken, Secretary By investigation and public hearing the Board determined the following facts pertinent to the decision: (All members of the Board visited the Liggis property). The Board finds that the applicant in this situation purchased two 50 ft- waterfront lots .'approximately 140 ft. in depth, one in 1954 and the other in 1955 on Bay Shore Road. Tax bills on these lots have always been rendered separately and the applicant considered that he was the owner of two adjoining parcels. The southerly parcel contained a residence and it was established that the applicant constructed, in the front yard area of the northerly parcel a one car garage, cesspool and water supply in 1955 or earlier, producing photostated lumber bills to confirm this date (prior to the establishment of the Southold Town Building Zone Ordinance.) Mr. Liggis stated that his original purpose in purchasing the adjoining lot to the north was to construct a second residence for sale or rent. It is apparent a start was made toward con- structing such a residence prior to the enactment of the Ordinance. Sometime in October Mr. Liggis advised his contractor Mr. Bumble to construct a boat house attached to the garage referred to in the preceeding paragraph. The Building Inspector advised the contractor that a building permit was unnecessary to expand an accessory building for an accessory use such as storing a boat. Within a short time- it became apparent that living quarters 24 ft. by 30 ft. were being attached to the original one car garage as evidenced by plumbing connections, inner partitions, large windows facing the water, ektensive grading, and other- items usually associated with residential construction. A large southerly opening would permit storing a boat. Strenuous objections arose to the attempt to circumvent the Ordinance and the Building Inspector advised them of a violation. In appealing the applicant applied for permission to convert an accessory building into a dwelling. Findings of the Board of Appeals indicate there is evidence Mr. Liggis believed he was the owner of two separate parcels, however we believe this is not relevant to the current situation. The facts indicate that the applicant is the owner of a residence on the southerly portion of his property and is applying to legalize a second residence violating the front and side yard restrictions of the Ordinance on the northerly side of his property which approximates 100 ft. by 140 ft. , a single lot for zoning purposes. Although the immediate areas on the east side of Bay Shore Road is built up and consists predominately of 50 ft. to 60 ft. lots with single residences, this application requests permission for two dwellings on one lot. Such a use is denied to all others and cannot be considered an unusual or unique hardship. Construction of the dwelling constitutes self-imposed hardship. It should also be noted that an accessory building such as a garage located in the front yard area, whether constructed prior to or after the passage of the Zoning Ordinance con- stitutes a non-conforming use of property, and that the expansion of such a non-conforming use exceeding 50/ fAir value of the original structure requires a special exception. In considering the above information the Board finds: 1. The use would prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent propetties. 2. That the character of the existing and probable development of the uses in the district would be adversely affected, and 3. That the conservation of property values would be adversely affected. Therefore it was RESOLVED that Charles Bumble, a/c Thomas Liggis be denied permission to convert an accessory building into a one family dwelling on a lot with a frontage of 50 feet, insufficient area, in- sufficient side yards, and leave a lot with a frontage of 50 feet and insufficient area. Property located on east side Bay Shore Road, Greenport, New York. | / ^- -^^�~ �~~^~"�~�^�^~�~=�~�^-' -^�^ /nuu � m� | ' .� �% - '°" +~�' ` �G�0 . ` ! . � | ---- --------� � � �����- -E/S .Ba]�-_'-_� � ~ . . L'���-��'---��---�---------� � ..............� ' TOv,rN of souTHOLD, NEW YORK ACTION OF TIIE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DATE March 19, 1964 Appeal No. 640 Dated March 9, 1964 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF TET TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Thomas Liggio To 46 Somerset Drive Appellant Great..Neck, New York at a mecthrg of the Zoning Board of Appeals on Thursday, March 19, 1964 the appeal was considered and the .action indicated below was taken on your Request for variance due to lack of access to property ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance iX) Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance -- 1. SPECIAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a special exception ( ) be granted ( ) be denied:pursuant to Article Section _._...._.. Subsection _ _ ,_ _. paragraph _.._.__.._..._ of the Zoning Ordinance, and the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be .reversed { ) be confirmed because 7:30 P.M. (E.S.T.), upon application of Thomas Liggio, 46 Somerset Drive, Great Neck, New York, for a variance. in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 303 and Article X, Section 1000A, for permission to divide property into two lots with 50 ft. frontage and insufficient area. Location of property: east side Bay Shore Road, Greenport, New York, Lots 66 and 67 on map of Peconic Bay Estates, Bounded north by Frank F. Csajko, east by Peconic Bay, south by James Rosati (Lots 68 & 69), and west by Bay Shore Road. 'l. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would)(would not) produce practical difficulties or unnec- essary hardship because SEE REVERSE (b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and- (would) (would not) he shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because SEE REVERSE (c) .ThE vaVance (does) (does not) observe the,spirit of the Ordinance and (would) (would not) change the character of the district became SEE REVERSE and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( .) be granted ( ) be denied and that the previous decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) :be confirmed ( ) be reversed. APPROVED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FORM ZB4 — � n oar ppea Judith T. Boken, Secretary (Continued from front) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant owns a parcel of land with 100 ft. frontage. This property was purchased in two separate lots with 50 ft. frontage at different times. (Lots 66 and 67, map of Peconic Bay Estates). There is a one family residence on the southerly Lot 67 and a garage with attached residence on the northerly Lot 66.` in Octobar 1963 the applicant added a boat house to the existing garage on the northeiZylot 66 and after completing it, decided to convert it into a one family dwelling. A variance was sought and denied by the Board of Appeals on the grounds that the applicant wished two dwellings on one lot, further the garage in the front yard area is considered non- conforming and the expansion of such a non-conforming use exceeding 50°% fair value of the original structure requires a special exception. The applicant now seeks permission to divide this 100 ft. parcel into two lots with"50 ft. frontages and reduced area and maintain a one family residence o n-each. - The Board is of the-opinion this-would be a satisfactory division of the property since the east side of Bay-Shore Road is built up and consists predominately of 50 ft.;- to 60 ft. lots with single residences. However, the,Board only grants permission for this division on the•condition that the residence attached to the boat house on the northerly lot 66 be detached and moved to a position no closer to the front property line than the existing one family dwelling on the southerly lot 67. Further, this dwelling must be centrally located on the lot so that side yard variations will not be required. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance will produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance does observe the spirit of the Ordinance and will not change-.:the character of the district. Therefore it was RESOLVED that Thomas Liggio, 46 Somerset Drive, Great Neck, New York, be granted permission to divide his property (Lots 66 & 67, Map of Peconic Bay Estates), located on the east side of Bay Shore Road, Greenport, New York, into two separate lots each having 50 ft. frontage and reduced area. It is a condition of the granting of this variance that the residence attached to the garage on the northerly line be detached and moved to a position no closer to the front property line than the existing one family dwelling on the southerly lot. Further, this dwelling must be centrally located on the lot so that side yard variations will not be required. s .r APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS SufFO� Southold Town Hall Gerard P. Goehringer,Chairman r/y 53095 Main Road James Dinizio,Jr. P.O. Box 1179 Lydia A.Tortora a , Southold,New York 11971-0959 Lora S. Collins �,j, • �'� ZBA Fax(631)765-9064 George Horning '�Ql ��O Telephone(631)7654809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF.JULY 19, 2001 Appl. No. 4971 —DOUGLAS BRADFORD 1000-53-6-16 STREET& LOCATION: 3.705 Bayshore Road, Greenport DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: July 12, 2001 FINDINGS OF FACT PROPERTY FACTS: The subject property is a lot of 7396 sq. ft. in Greenport, with frontage of 50 feet on Bayshore Road and 50 feet on Peconic Bay, and depth of about 148 feet. It is improved with a one-story frame house and detached garage. BASIS OF APPEAL: Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval, dated May 1, 2001, denying a permit,for additions to the house for the following reasons: (1) proposed side yards of 6.5 feet (North) and about 1 foot (South) are less than the minimum of 10 feet and combined minimum of 25 feet required by Code section 100-2448; (2) proposed lot coverage is+/-26 percent, in violation of the 20 percent limit in Code section 100-24413; (3) proposed deck is 46 feet from the bulkhead, in violation of the 75-foot requirement of Code Section 100-239.48. AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant requests a variance authorizing construction of the additions as proposed. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION DESCRIBED BELOW: On the batis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspection, the Board makes the following findings: 1. At the hearing, applicant stated that the proposed additions do not encroach on the existing side yard setbacks, which are 6.5 feet on the North and 7.5 feet on the South. The drawing of the proposed additions submitted to the Building Department was erroneous in showing the southerly setback reduced to about 1 foot. Although the side yard setbacks will not change, the house will expand to two stories, creating a larger structure along the existing setbacks. 2. Information submitted by the applicant following the hearing shows proposed lot coverage of 24.2 percent, compared with 23.9 percent now. Applicant proposes to expand the coverage of the house, but to offset that by removing a wooden ramp and concrete pad. 3. The neighborhood is characterized by small lots with a fairly high degree of lot coverage, and it is common for houses to be located less than 75 feet from the bulkhead. Applicant intends to make the house bulkier, by adding a second floor, porch and deck, but the side yard setbacks will not change and the lot coverage will barely change. The house is sufficiently far back from the bulkhead that the threat to neighbors' views is minimal. The expanded house will not be inconsistent with the neighborhood, and grant of the relief set forth below will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties. Page 2-July 19, 2001 ZBA Appl. No.4971=D. Bradford Parcel 1000-53-6-16 at Greenport 4. There is no evidence that grant of the relief set forth below will have an adverse effect or impact on physical or environmental conditions. 5. The action set forth below is the minimum necessary to enable applicant to expand the house while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION/ACTION: On motion by Chairman Goehringer, seconded by Member Collins, it was RESOLVED, to DENY the variance applied for, and ALTERNATIVELY to GRANT a variance authorizing additions to the house as described at the hearing and in written submissions, with the following provisions: 1. The northerly and southerly side yards are to be maintained at a minimum of 6.5 and 7.5 feet, respectively; 2. Lot c3verage is to be no greater than the figure proposed in applicant's submission dated July 16, 2001, 24.2 percent; reduced by an amount reflecting the 1-foot reduction in the depth of the porch, which the Board calculates at about 0.5 percent, resulting in a maximum coverage of 23.7 percent; 3. The new deck is to be set back no less than 47 feet from the bulkhead. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that violates the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Goehringer (Chairman), Dinizio, Tortora, and Collins. This Resolution was duly adopted (4-0). rard P. GoehHnger Chairman . BOARD MEMBERS ®F$®�/ Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �� fey® 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 �® �p Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes �, Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. ® �0� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento ®lij'COU Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 25, 2021 Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 Anthony Portillo 1075 Franklinville road Laurel,NY 11948 RE: Appeal No. 7544,Bradford 3705 Bayshore Road, Greenport SCTM No. 1000-53-6-16 Dear Mr. Portillo; Transmitted for your records is a copy of the Board's October 21, 2021 Findings, Deliberations and Determination,the original of which was filed with the Town Clerk regarding the above variance application. Please Read Carefully the Conditions of Approval. Before commencing any construction activities, a building permit is necessary. Please be sure to submit an application along with a copy of the,attached.determination to the Planning -Department and the Building Department. - If you have any questions,please don't hesitate to contact our office. LSimncerel , Kim E. Fuentes Board Assistant Encl. cc:Building Dept. BOARD MEMBERSO� SOU Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �0�� ry�l0 53095 Main Road -P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. % • �O� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento �l,Y Southold,NY 11971 COUNT`l;� http://southoldtQwnny.gov RECEIVED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS;. - " G . ��1M TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OCT Tel.(631)765-1809 Fax(631)765-9064 tt (_L So th®Id T02Clerk -FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF OCTOBER 21,201 ZBA FILE: #7544 NAME OF APPLICANT: Douglas Bradford- PROPERTY LOCATION:3705 Bayshore Road(Adj.to Shelter Island Sound/Peconic Bay),Greenport,NY SCTM#.1000-53-6-16 SEaRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of-Appeals has visited the property under consideration tin this ication-and determines that this review falls under the Type H.category of.-tlie.State's I;ist of.Actions,with further steps.under.SEQRA. . : . . SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE"CODE: This-.application was.referred'as required under t1ie.S4561k Count-.Adm-inistrative Code Sections A 14-14 thio-A14-25;and the.Suffolk County D.epar n ent:6 lannin'g"issued= its reply"dated July 12;202 'statingthatthis application is considered a:n atter for local-determ -ioin:as there appears to be,no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was'referred for review cinder Chapter_268, Waterfront-Consistency review-of the Town'of-Southold-Town Code and the. Local Waterfront Revitalization-Program,(LWRP)'PoliQy Standards. The LV,RP.Coordinator issued-a recommendation dated September 8;2021;Based upon.the.information provided on the LWRP.Consistency Assessment Form submitted-to this department,as.well as the records available; it-is recommended that--the proposed action is INCONSISTENT from°the LWRP pertaining'to-Policy 4.1 of the Chapter. The coordinator stated in his a portion of the�sub ject parcel where-the new porcl is proposed is located-within the FEMA-flood-zone V_(velocity hazard). The flood.zone_poses_a:high flood risk. The VE flood zone is an area inundated by I% annual chance flooding-with velocity hazard.(wave action). Structure in these locations-should be minimized and-not increase or exceed the-bulk schedule requirement"(percent.cover). However, since.the proposed.addition on the waterside of the-dwelling does not create any additional ground disturbance,the Board finds the proposed action CONSISTENT'with the LWRP. The proposed side yard setbacks and second-floor additions are recommended as EXEMPT. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The subject property is a 7,396 square foot parcel in the Residential R-40 Zoning District. The northerly line measures 147.87 feet the easterly line measures 50.00 feet and is adjacent to Shelter Island Sound/Peconic Bay,the southerly line measures 147.97 feet and the westerly line.measures 50.00 feet and is.adjacent to Bayshore Road. The parcel is improved with a two-story frame residence with an accessory one- car garage located to front of the residence facing Bayshore Road, and there is a wooden deck with jacuzzi in the rear yard facing Peconic Bay. The survey map was prepared by John T.Metzger,LS and last revised July 9,2001. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XXIII, Section 280 -124 and the Building Inspector's May 18, 2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct a new porch and Page 2,October 21,2021 #7544,Bradford SCTM No. 1000-53-6-16 second floor additions and alters to a single-family dwelling;at; 1)located less than the code required minimum side yard setback of 10 feet on two side yards;2)located less than the code required minimum combined side yard setback of 25 feet: 3)more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%; located at:3705 Bayshore Road-(Adj._to shelter Island Sound/Peconic Bay), Greenport,NY.SCTM#1000-53-6-16. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to construct a new.front porch,second floor additions and alterations The proposed construction,on this nonconforming 7,396 square foot parcel in the Residential R-40 Zoning District is not permitted-pursuant to Article XXHI Section 280-124 which states:.lots"measuring less than 20,000 square feet in total size require a minimum side yard.setback of 10 feet.with.a combined.side yard.setback of 25 feet:. Section 280-124 further states lot coverage to be a maximum of 20%. The Site Plan and Architectural Plans depict proposed addition of dormers to the second floor along with the new proposed porch. The proposed construction and a side yard setback of 7.3 feet_(south),with a combined shows a minimum side yard setback of 6.5 feet(north), t. The site plan also-shows the proposed lot coverage to be 24.6%. .The increased. side yard setback of 13,8 fee and show on the drawing prepared by Anthony Portillo,RA, and dated June expansion is a total of 545 square feet 22,2021. AD_ ITION;AL INFORMATION: The LWRP coordinator and the applicant differ on.the VE flood zone shown.-on D the applicant's survey-versus the map used by the LWRP coordinator. The existing..hot tub/jacuzzi:on the wobderi deck facing:seaward.should be eliminated. Upon examiinatiori of the,exist ng-garage,it was found to have.a full bath room:including h a sliovder along with'a large kitchen like;counter-top sink and cabinet:. While:half baths are allowed; :a '`t'' en like-s"ink.an �cabidet:arc. Th6.representative suYimtted prior: $g:determipatign:. ,- the -shower and-large ki ch 1 1'9 2(10X;=in which the$oard grantedrelief foz aclditioas and alteratibh tb. e:dwelhng on the subl et #4971 dated 7u,y - , : c s..at,a minanum,o65 aTrrl; :Sfeet,,r:�s•pectively z:;;<: ...:•- ,•. . m .the northerl aizd;:$o1 a lithe y.sido4yar set a.. Pd.* M.- gain m .. . .. . -..- ..Y - .p. P. iX a. .42 :2 F.. cov of ot- - - - -;::,, • - maxmn d;a .�. - - - - t. S }i 'ec fie . u . .. -_ _..- .. . . _ ,-.. - - deteiariatioris-for:samlararelie..,.. - wesubmitred: nor Z$A a hcant s f,.e resentafi - p, - _ In add itYon ahe P,. . - - ardy'setback�; - d=setback:.ZB #7234:a :noval dor Gf-. :. nen hborhood .ZBA#65'62=approvalf or'a_Sfeetarde;yar.- P . g.. #6:55.6 a roval.for 2`6% lot yard coverage with side yard setbacks:at:65.feet at the_noiEhpropertyairie and;.;Q -ZBA pp. feet side•yard setback attheaouthein property 1- ' and co ibiftedside.yard setback eet wage of 26%. ZBA#614'4.approved ed 33.:'/%.16t e.&&rage.--This community has many-sma l_aots with homes:that:Have. . been remodeled over tine._This apphcat 1s.also subject to Southold Town Board of Trustees approval FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The'Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on October 7,2021 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law $267=b(3)(b)(1): Grant of the variances will riot produce an undesirable-change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The addition of dormersand a front porch are characteristic the design of other homes on Bayshore. .Non-conforming side yard and rear yard setbacks as well as excessive lot coverage are typical in this neighborhood which is characterized by small,narrow lots. 2. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The existing dwelling already has non-conforming single and combined side yard setbacks which are being maintained with the addition of the proposed second floors construction and the lot coverage is already approved by prior ZBA decision for 24.2`/o. •a Page 3,October 21,2021 #7544,Bradford SCTM No. 1000-53-6-16 3. Town Law X267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial,representing 35%and 27%for each side,respectively and combined side yard relief at 44.8%relief from the Code. The lot coverage relief requested is mathematically substantial representing 23%relief from the Code. However,prior ZBA approval for a lot coverage of 24.2 %was granted and the proposed increase is for .4%which is de minimus and the existing non- conforming side yards setbacks.,which also received prior ZBA approval,are.being maintained. 4. Town Law X267-b(3)(b)(41 No evidence has been-submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the-physical or environmental:conditions in the-neighborhood.. The applicant.must comply with Chapter 236 of the.Town's Storm.Water Management.Code: 5.-Town Law 4267=b(3)(b)((5). The difficulty hast been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning.Code was in effect and it is presumed.that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge.of.the.. limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time purchase.- 6. Town Law &267-b. .Grant of the requested relief is the'minimum action necessary and adequate to enable:the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a new-front porch�.nd_second floor additions Arid alterations while preseivirig aid : . protecting the.character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the:.commuriity. 1 Esso ,UT1.ON.0 F THE BOARD;In.considering all-af the above factors-arid applying.the-balaneirigaest under New- York T owri.Law X67=B;=oration°yeas offered by Member Acainpora,aeconded by 1Vlenber. ?eisman(Chairperson;', ana y A :.carried,}o - a ?4. .. - - slovii'ozi° ite 'latr ai Aretet : .:.:'li :p,:;..k?.:>, AA ,.. . . .. a �e_ .. - :variances.. - :... , ,.the. . - --. ... .. .�.. p..:.. . .-.__-_ ._ ,. - - z_.. ......_.. -porfiillo;Architect and,:d�ated' SUBJECT T0;THE.FOU0 MING CONDITIONS::: 1. The waterside"as built:deck".and-Hot:Tub/Jaeuzii-shall•be-removed. 2: The shower in the.accessory garage shall be removed. .. . 3. The kitchen.lik.e counter-top sink and:cabinet.in.the accessory garage shall be removed and replaced with a sink fitting a-half bath. 4. This variance relief is subject to Southold Town Board of.Trustee's Approval. This approval shall not be deemed effective until the required conditions.have keen met.At the discretion.of the Board of Appeals,failure to comply with the above conditions may render this decision null and void That the above conditions be written into the Building-Inspector's Certificate-of Occupancy, when issued The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de nzinimis in nature for ann alteration that does izot increase the degree of nonconformity. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or apossible denial by the Building Department of a buildingpermit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current orfuture use,setback Page 4,October 21,2021 #7544,Bradford SCTM No. 1000-53-6-16 or,other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Pursuant to Chapter 280-146(B) of the Code of the Town of Southold-any variance granted by the d void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been Board of Appeals slialI become null an procured; and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with-the.Suffolk.Co..unty Clerk,within three (3)years.from the date such.variance was granted. The Board of.Appeals may, upon written. request prior_to tjw date of expiration, grant an extension not.to.exceed three(3) consecutive:one (1)year terms. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Weisman(Chairperson),Dante, and Planamento;Acampora and Lehmrt. This Resolution was duly adopted(5-0). sli&x--- es:Weisrrian,..Cliairpersori 2 02 oved o '�liri'r - BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson 53095 Main Road• P.O.Box 1179 h® �® Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora a�c Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. ® �� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento ®��COUN11 Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809 9 Fax(631)765-9064 April 27,2022 Jessica Magee AMP Architecture, PLLC 1075 Franklinville Road Laurel,NY 11948 Re: De Minimus Request Denied, File#7544 Bradford,3705 Bayshore Road, Greenport, SCTM No. 1000-53-6-16 Dear Ms. Magee; We are in receipt of your correspondence dated April 21, 2022 requesting a de minimus approval for proposed improvements to the above referenced single family dwelling. We reviewed your letter and.the Zoning Board of Appeals determinations No. 7544,dated October 21,2021. The applicant was granted variance relief for additions and alterations to the existing single-family dwelling that were less than the code required two side yard setbacks and excessive Iot coverage for a second-floor addition and a new porch. In your letter you explain that the plans have not aItered from the plans approved by the ZBA in file# 7544. However; the Southold Town Plans Examiner, after reviewing your submissions to the Building Department, has now determined that the project is a demolition pursuant to Town Code. The ZBA relies on the Building Department's expertise to determine whether a project is considered a demolition of an existing structure. Since it is the Building Department's assessment that the subject structure is being demolished,pursuant to Town Code,a Notice of Disapproval will issue for variances that are required. Consequently, the Board has determined that your request is not de minimus in nature. This decision is consistent with other denials for de minimus requests that we have issued to applicants that were granted relief for additions and alterations that were later determined to result in a demolition. Should you wish to pursue the rebuilding of a single-family dwelling,you will need to apply for variance relief for a demolition with a new application and a public hearing. Please contact our office for any additional questions or concerns. Jlie l Kanes Weisman Chairperson cc: Michael Verity, Building Department AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval, use variance, area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239m and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant:AMP Architecture 2. Address of Applicant:1075 Franklinville Road, Laurel, N.Y. 11948 3. Name of Land Owner (if other than Applicant): DOUGLAS BRADFORD 4. Address of Land Owner: 3705 BRADSHORE RD GREENPORT NY 5. Description of Proposed Project: PROPOSED SECOND STORY DORMERS, FIRST FLOOR ADDITION ANDCOVEREDPORCH. 6.number) B1on of RADSHORE_road and Tax map TM: 53-06-16 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? { } Yes {4 No 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? { } Yes {)�No 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s) of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff, it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office(765-1937) or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS I N/A 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use the back of this page if there are additional property owners) 4el 110b2 6 /10 /21 Signature ofApplicant Date Note: 1. The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2. Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3. Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. 617.20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for ComnletinLy Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: DOUGLAS BRADFORD Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 3705 BAYSHORE RD,GREENPORT Brief Description of Proposed Action: -CONSIDERED DEMOLITION PER TOWN CODE AND RECONSTRUCTION TO SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING. -PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR DORMERS(358 SF) -PROPOSED 1 ST FLOOR ADDITION,BUILDING OUT WHERE PORCH EXISTS(125 SF) -PROPOSED PORCH(62.5 SF) Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 516-214-0160 AMP Architecture E-Mail: jmagee@amparchitect.com Address: 10200 MAIN RD UNIT 3A City/PO: State: Zip Code: MATTITUCK N.Y. 11952 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that X may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: X 3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 0.012 acres FJ b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.0014 acres c. Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? •17 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban ❑Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ®Residential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Aquatic ❑Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 4 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? X b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? X 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? X 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes, identify: X 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES X b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? X c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? X 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: X 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: X 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: N/A X 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? X b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? X 13. a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO I YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? X b. Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? X If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: ❑ Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland ❑Urban M Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats, listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? X 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES X 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑NO ❑YES X b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ❑NO❑YES Page 2 of 4 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: X 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: X 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: X I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: ANTHONY PORTICO Date: 6/22/22 Signature: ,cQ� d2z Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 Board_ofZonin2 Agneals Application AUTHORIZATION (Where the Applicant is not ihc�Owner) S �,41-A4esicling at 7 c (Print"property owiter's mule)- (MailingAddress) do Hereby authorize. _ AMI'.Architecture C/ (Agent) to Apply for variance.(s) on my behalf ffoizi the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. Pwnor's Signature) (Print Owner's Name) APPLiCANTIOWN 1ER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interestand allow it to take wh.itever action is alecessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: Douglas Bradford (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION:(Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit ri _ Vaance Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by.blood,marriage,or business interest.`Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check att that apply): A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares ofthe corporate stockbf the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) S)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of tate applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RE,L.ATIONSNIP Submitted this 10 day of JUNE 20 21 Signature Print Name 7)C, &—t_t%t AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME : ANTHONY PORTILLO (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance X Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If you answered "YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 10 day oof� L�JUNE 920 21 Signature Print Name ANTHONY PORTILLO Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the L%W is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 53 _ 06 _ 16 The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board 0 Planning Dept. 0 Building Dept. ® Board of Trustees 0 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital 0 construction,planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant,loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval,license, certification: Nature and extent of action: CONSIDERED DEMOLITION/RECONSTRUCTION PER TOWN CODE. PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR DORMERS AND PROPOSED PORCH . Location of action: 3705 BAYSHORE RD GREENPORT NY 11944 Site acreage: .17 ACRES Present land use: SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE Present zoning classification: R-40 NC 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: AMP ARCHITECTURE (b) Mailing address: 10200 MAIN RD UNIT 3K P0-BOX 61195WATTITUCK NY 11952 (c) Telephone number:Area Code( ) 516-214-0160 (d) Application number,if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No 0 If yes,which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ©Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable THE PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR DORMERS AND COVERED PORCH WILL MAINTAIN THE COMMUNITY CHARACTER, PRESERVE OPEN SPACE AND MAKE EFFICIENT USE OF INFRASTURE AND GOOD USE OF THE COSTAL LOCATION AND MINIMIZES ADVERSE EFFECTS OF DEVELOPMENT. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable THERE ARE NO HISTORICAL OR ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ON THIS PROPERTY. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ® Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable THE PROPOSED DORMERS AND COVERED PORCH DOES NOT AFFECT THE VISIUAL QUALITY OR THE PROTECTION OF SCENIC RESOURCES. Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ® Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable ALL PROPOSED WORK WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOST UP TO DO CONSTRUCTION CODES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION PRACTICES. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes 0 No ®Not Applicable THE PROPQSFD CONSTRUCTION WILL NOT AFFECT THE WATFR QUALITY. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes 0 No© Not Applicable THE PROPOSED SECOND STORY DORMERS AND COVER PORCH WILL NOT AFFECT THE COSTAL FISH AND WILDLIFE. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes [:] No® Not Applicable THE PROPOSED WORK WILL NOT AFFECT THE AIR QUALITY. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No © Not Applicable ALL WASTER WILL BE CONTROLLED ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS WILL BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ YeO No © Not Applicable THIS IS A PRIVATE PROPERTY THAT HAS NO POUBLIC ACCESS AND IT WILL NOT AFFECT ITS NEIGHBORS. Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. © Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable THE PROPPOSED WORK IS ON A PRIVATE SITE AND WILL NOT AFFECT NATURAL SHORELINE OR WATER AREAS. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable PROPOSED WORK WILL NOT AFFECT MARINE RESOURCES Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No© Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No H9 Not Applicable Created on 512510511:20 AM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY iwc%;voKw AnRD OWNER STREET 0 VILLAGE DISTRICT SUB. LOT z 6 fat.S It _e Zj I'le 6.71c- ld�_ Fd�MER-'OWNER N E ACREAGE �'j S W TYPE OF BUILDING A A*m 91 91 f misc. a,lue RES. SEAS VL. FARM comm. IND. CB. Est Mkt. V LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS q'7 716 61 (IV Q Or' oco 0'��:2_2a,!�/(' z - :3'� -7q � Z46, lo, b-TDO C, I 1 .1 - I., V�./ AGE 70LO B 11,1DING qPNDITk00,7/, 0104/ 45ee,?7�01 FRONTAGE ON WATER NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOV Form Acre Value Per Acre Value- , FRO NTAGE ON ROAD Tillable I BULKHEAD Tillable 2 DOCK Tillable, 3 J Woodland Swampland Brushlbnd 'K� House Plot J Total (0 (jc, -FFT 11 F fit 9............ 1 1 Ill IL M. Bldg. ndation Bath Basement Floors on Extensi (�6 o b n erior Finish Extension Ext 'Walls 't Extension Fire Place Heat Porch Roof Typ'e' Porch Rooms I st Floor B reezeway Patio: Rooms 2nd Floor Garage DriVe'way Dormer 1 Y Y 0. B.,/ "o ' fib' V\ , ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ - r �� f; , t t �. ,� �� �.f- :b� ■■■■■■■■■■■■erg■v��i■e■■■e■■■■e It ■■■■■■SAI■■If■t!■■■■■■■■■■■■ , 'Vtj ■■■■■■■till■■■■■■ti■■■■■■■■■■■■ COMBO rj • uPARTIAL •• .i ro MAIN � ■ 0 fAll PHOTO #1 PHOTO #2 NIL- Iowa PHOTO #3 PHOTO #4 Application: Bradford Residence AMP Architecture—Applicant; All photos taken December 21, 2020 PHOTO #5 PHOTO • • Application: Bradford Residence f.%� � ,.��� � � I;r � � •�%•- ',AGI -- 'SEE SEC:NO045 rM TCH / '. .'�; - .•LINE' o?' _ ._�, _ r L -;/, .• ;FOR PCLNO^ -,>Nr 45, 'rb r• }(.. - �, '`c. SEE SEC'NO. '_�.. .. '.V• 41 m' FOR PARCEL NO; V •'e' SEE SEC.NO. 045-05-007.3'" - Q•t6i ''! /- ' '? ,t Sig -�,f a " iF - "' '.}, - •'�,�,�" r 17 c! TOWN OF :SOUTHOLLoIr:% 1FFOLK +a>xw a f .. •, / �/�� /� 'SV.`/, . vo e y r�,. --..:"➢s'`� ' TOWINOF �ivr '.�iCJ „SOUTHOLO � QQ- .. �•' - --.�a. .IT7! 00 77 SOUTHOLO 'g�84 � EEK ,§ I g:F •a,'e, , 1 t r i 0' l tf,7y�.,..0 s''3.$,�iz i:s..,.2 �'Sy``�-. ;gs 6 2 •.?� 'L3-.'� ate` � ," - o ' Yv 7i ',8•�g't '.,� 3 .14 _. z?: 'o;op,9" •"x - .. Yg2j , ,aj!o� ,'a. 25�.' -42,41 Y W• 95 YY?p 4 ts�"ices„'d ;R, r � B '•r�/'.�" qQ'2 ��, ,,ter 1 - �o •,9M 3.';•,',.�?K/ao�a`s.yc5�/� � =,1 � J -. a,.'��r P0 .. y ' YY3'. off' ,,a 7 '2W. �� ry, „ot� 48.10 7.6A 46.7 �,. •;5N a X10 „\% "'1'„'•� �' `' `�`'� ' C 48.9 > n , 46"t1 , 75A ,fi<'-'�,,'�' e''�':°�', :g'y ., ;•�- 468 ,- .��.,�,r:�•I',duo ,��'i' _ N"537.182, ':t• 7.2Atis SEE SEC.N0.057 LINE MATCH •" LINE�'�' •��-s'm, •�;F�`q; .�; ,e.'�'° e,:¢-' Wi: '”"•1 a. .� SEE SEC NO.057 +" .���•`.,ter-'?,„= .,2A r': J:-. ., . �• j".- . � t ^ �;�,�"La w�"0_, isL;rlo viery!F•.!;-' _ ., COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © N NOTICE ETrsoc. IaQ' '' a osrRlcT rao. 1000 x SECTION NO. Real Property Tax Service Agency 7 MAINTENANCE ALTERATION SALE OR v W DISTRIBUTION OF ANY PORTON OF THE 9 uoo jp TOAN OF 053 300 Cenfer'EIrvv,kierhad,AY 11901 M u? SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP IS PROH81TEO A ms [oo o xoa uoo WITHOUT WRITTEN PERN�SIJN OF THE P !ccn' - Feet S, REAL PROPERTY TAX SERVICE AGecy we a WLLaGB OF I 1 I LOT 66, ®AMENDED MAP A , PECONIC NAY ESTATES" SURVEYED:23 NOV 2021 FILED 19 MAY, 1933 AS FILE NO. 1124 AT ARSHAMOMOQUE, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK CO.,N.Y. 1.47 TBH2POL 6.61 GB SCTM 1000-53- 06- 16 3.53 PIG n m C3 312 40P SCALE: 1=20' 7.42 UP49 01��eVt2 NOTES: O S1 h cpNCBHO G �O AC:ASPHALT t 11I�' �o' �rR AP:ANGLE POINT n �� m N �` • BB:BELGIAN BLOCK m ® 0 E Cu+�- HO'1 0 BLD: L:COMPOSITE DECK 1 N,�.3op®j$00 s.92 .s.45P1G��• � �_ CL:CENTERLINE v n m \ 1.6 S. e6' .8 GRA V 5.75 � w R1 O7. EX.=EXISTING N c 1 BC2FSLT 7.62 X TeN� �° 4X26 w N SLATE Wim" 8.42CDAP :::r;:::::.:•. �, EX.SS.LAT.:EXIST GRAY 8.21 ` r:• z Q SEWER LATERALCpIIlP• try►'n N FF:FINISH FLOOR n ::.;:; ^;; GEN 4• -� i'o p (:i:0 r;:;;. o FHV:HYDRANT VALVE n n is i TCAP 7 40: L FLOE ZpPi6'71 vs-+ DECK 6.9 NG 6 m` c o ZA sr W m m \ N`1 ® 6 ot® G 240P :G BREAK L 1 G8 RADE B 0. C� � 3 m \ 2 s m � GL:GAS LINE G V 6.42 '��i�. `•` 38 H O .a c co RA 1• EX. VAP 18.17 NG:NATURAL GROUND .�i`�����'��k"':'� '?'�r�;•`_ <:r.':�rrrr.:::;:r:>,. PCC:CONCRETE os o o `�► tme v m V0t t r POL•POINT ON LINE 738 VFPFli1PT (m PROPOSED) EF�ppe67N � TBz° ppEN �� t�.� g,14 1mSIc �` 'F;:'.; , iTB�Ap vn SRF:SPLIT RAIL FENCE AC 7,30 . ® BKAP6.9 o p-l� FF to �� 60 qg SSMH:SEWER MANHOLE z ®. w m� `` ® Ski 6• riir:';ri;;r:;: TBH:TOP BULKHEAD s ec N r 3 w p gOD 6 p2' :<' 5.93WBHAP 1 AP TBR:TO BE REMOVED �o T g B�pP SOC 6s 6' ` T r m , Tsoe ¢3NWD H0.1N TC:TOP OF CURB 6,9 1.70P1G v• d - P °° �+ 3Z "°BCTy, 6.90TG:TOP OF GRATE KAP 7. �5.92TBHWDPOL TH:TESTHOLE TW:TOP OF WALL o, 7,00 B P ,� U/L:UPPER LEVEL GRAVAP 6.41 •mom .:; gn UIP:UTILITY POLE O EP 6.48 ;:... GA 6g GRANA ?i'€:.v► `rt i;. 6.94 6• 'o® NGGRA V 6.23 WF:WOOD FENCE 'ri:0;<€i;:, ni FF 677 o ��1.63 PIG WV:WATER VALVE 1�',g' VF:VINYL FENCE pp CAllFD 6.75 i'!� i�fi; ''rVv!r;'::'I;GRAVAPr;; 6.67 FF •� ,04 NG 5 73op 0:.. 7.01 BKPCCAP 0 GR V P .31''`' i'` ".....9' 6.69 lNiv➢ OF Ne w 0 o+ O A. G =M os = t:pCONC.MONUMENT AC 6.71° EPAP6.28 r:;::;rrr;¢::c:::::.,•::.:::: ::::::::::;:r:r:r:::;:t:r:i::::::::::....:.::::..::.. RECEIVE® � �o .;.:,,.,,• ii::::.. .::::::::.:::.::: JUN 2 2 2022 LOT a 7,396 S.F. TO TIE LINE .6.55` 0 O 6.838ODSET BKPCCA ,0.80 WP EPAP6.25 Zoning Board of Appeals 050 rn ap THE OFFSETS OR DIMENSIONS SHOWN HERON FROM THE PROPERTYLINES TO '9 THE STRUCTURES ARE FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE&USE.THEREFORE THEYARE 3 r LAND SSU C.50869 NOT INTENDED TO MONUMENT THE PROPERTYLINES OR TO GUIDE THE ERECTION T11i. P.O, BOX 704 RIDGE, NY 11961 OF FENCES,ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES OR ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENT. UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS ORADDmONS TO THIS SURVEYIS A VIOLATION OF 951.640.4899 SECTION 7209 SUBDIVISON 20 OF THE NEW YORK STATE'EDUCATION LAW. COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING THE LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BEA VAUD TRUE COPY CERTIFICATIONS INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM FEMA FIRM MAP N60813O. SOUTH L _ 7HESURVEY IS PREPARED, AND ON THEIRBEHAIFTOTHE TITLE COMPANY,GOV ,6.49AC 6.27 EP IS"ND.'VIEW LANE COMMUNITY NO.360813 SOUTHOLD 1 ERNMENTAGENCY AND LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HERE ON CERTIFICATIONS I ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE TO ADDITIONAL INSTITUTIONS OR SUBSEQUENT OWNERS. NO RESPONSIBILITYISASSUMED BY THE UNDERSIGNED FORANYSURFACE, SUB- ELEVA77ONS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO NA VD 88 SURFACE,AERIAL EASEMENTS,SUBSURFACE U7IUTIES AND/ OR STRUCTURES IN OR OUT OF EASEMENTS FSO PROVIDED. SCTM 1000 d 53-06-16 I, C ENERAL 5YMB0L KEY: 0- a oQ WW3 wo ,^�.--� wa EXISTN6 TO RBdAIN F� NSA FWNDATION WLL Am� Zm k aJ 3 3 F-o3wga NEW WOOD R2AME z a w¢m J W O=W emi y�3aLL0, 04,w w a Q W Q�z Z o=a<.�-c�i w O O o.-P. a cc w O Oa 0 i aa�z aZ- 0 � zaa i V W X .0 W r J 0 Z 2i Q J ¢z wzp Baa z a� z n W F w w Y N z o.0 0 y C W Z O H O V y U Q Q It Ir Q S EXIST.PORTION OF WALL EXIST.PORTION OF WALL �TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED i -——————--� r--———— ----- -----� tV 4„ lit I I u_,' -_u I I Lu_-' I I I I NI I1 r--7-n I I \ I Ir-11 II I I II II II I L--.1JI — n I / I I III I L_—_L-r_—ja 'fl I II �� I III VEMOL15H INTERIOR I I I I II I WALLS(TYPJ I I \ II II 1 w I � J I Q r----------------- --- ----- Ji Q I F �r ALL EXISTING WINDOWS 6 I ALL EXISTING CABINETS, II tt1 1 I PLUMBING FIXTURES 6 IL rr DOORS ON THE FIRST FLOOR I APPLIANCES TO BE T TO BE REMOVED I REMOVED I r \ I —� hl SUN I � I I I I I II , III , i I I Bu�PCi zT_J I �iS \\i I Q W 0 0 ___ ___ ------1—J----- r----,------� I U W ---------- ------ -----------Z------� I I r------------Zlr-----� Z 0 } I L LL Q 2 F DEMOLITION NOTE: \\\� / j \\ / I LU Q 0a., PROVIDE 5HORIN6 AND SUPPORT TO ALL AFFECTED \1 i� �I \��,i ^ .. , m W STRUCTURAL MEMBERS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT r-r�' I %y I - ra < .,"•'�.eh 0 W OF ANY DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION. __ / \ I I �` 'ti, E' J1 N r {J /. as --- -___- y 4'_&" 2'-6"x`4'_3" EXIST.PORTION OF WALL I I To BE REMOVED 3},2 J LI-�,2" $' I uj cm CN "''�».... 0 0 of N C ' PROP05ED F I RST FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN ww SCALE:9/16•= 1'-0' ¢ Q GENERAL SYMBOL KEY: x wa � 0a wx W o a F 3 1—= EXISTING To REMAIN m=4 NBV FOUNDATION WALL z Z m a U ma¢a3a T✓aV WOOD FRAME za�wam �woxwm OQ�pw(~j a�r,fzz o=a��� w0odoo J w O ZmF-Nd H woa f �Z¢sza F x o ________________________________________________ ____ U x o< Q K w I I w�r�LLi3a E wo¢Fa�w 2ND FLOOR BALCONY AREA TO I a g�v E w w w I BE DEMOL15HED I I x w F5 W o ~ UIr fr!2 Q Q a Q 2 I I I ----1----�1 r------------------� r----- -- 1 r�-----------1 r------- ------ I h I I II A II u_-�� ��`_II u-�'� __u 41 IL III I I I m rI I II II EXI5TIN6 I DOORS TO BE II I I REMOVED I II II III I I ALL EXISTING WINDOWS 8 DOORS ON III ,n I I THE SECOND FLOOR TO BE REMOVED EXISTING w EXI5TING i� II I I WINDOWS TO BE WINDOWS TO BE // II InI III REMOVED REPLACED Da REMOVED / 11 II II ALL EXISTING SECOND FLOOR G.J. if IIII 8 R.R.TO BE REMOVED — ----------------- -- ---- � LIII III � I I \ U \ L------------------ I J-1 r---- T--- I �4 1U I I DEMOLISH INTERIOR I V u��� III /z �� I LL WALL5(TYPJ III I I n 0 ALL EXISTIN5 CABINETS, I / II Q W O 0) PLUMBING FIXTURES TO BE REMOVED I r� O �- Z LL W p Z Wca Q d Lo W O rL�9 T==== ------- z====--____- --- z====s-- ;'~ ,�.t Rh. _ rp� a M L--- -----s ----------- -----� ----- ------------------ -----�---J �`p� ` j e (n cr d DEMOLITION NOTE: �J PROVIDE 5HORIN6 AND SUPPORT TO ALL AFFECTED ,. 11 •✓r A STRUCTURAL MEMBERS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT � V OF ANY DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION. �� s cl Lu '93 74 cv PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR DEMOL 1 TI ON PLAN SCALE:5/16"= I'-O" Q PROJECT /ZONINGQATA----------- TAX MAP x 1000-53-06-16 W o a 3 ��wzma ZONING DISTRICT R-40 NG m a¢a g za3wam LOT AREA 0.17 ACRES f FEGONIG BAY^ =r= .w, GofO - I FAMILY DWELLING Z-210,03/03/1965 0 o-,0, zZwwDa MHWM AT THE TIE LINE GofO -PORCH 8 BALCONY a- z z 51706'40"E 50.00' ADDITIONS Z-29"f88, 10/23/03 Z w Jaw o o x a n o N�1. O=H VARIANCE APPROVAL ZEA FILE#7544;10/25/21 W W 1.-0 O O 1— f ozmCNa C.c Fr E0 XIST. CONCRETE BULKHEAD FEMA FLOOD ZONE X d VE-13 =a a Z}� g2<-gas Ww WETLANDS DISTRICT Y PENDING 8 ,N = I I APPROVAL oWoa'zw ¢❑z,a� 1-43738- LL W a o~o DEC DISTRICT Y 02774/0001 ~J t z ¢ azwo04 I I R-21-1789 a z P:p r SUFFOLK COUNTY HD APPROVAL 3 (PENDING 5 v S W,w BEDROOMS a L�13 APPROVAL x W�-oW- a wzc=i -oc=i� Fox I55'REAR SETBACK I HABITABLE SPACE EXISTING PROP05ED GRAWL5PACE AREA 0 S.F. 0 S.F. REMOVE EXIST I DECK AND HO TUB I FIRST FLOOR AREA 937 S.F. 1,058 S.F. SECOND FLOOR AREA 976 S.F. 1,253 S.F. zor�ve(Fi=is74--] ZONE x TOTAL BEDROOM COUNT 3 3 I I I PROP05ED I D FLOOR DORMER I LOT COVERAGE 36.3' DESCRIPTION(FOOTPRINT) AREA COVERAGE I I TOTAL LOT AREA 7,396.0 S.F. IEX15T.2 STRY WD. 1 FRAME DWELLING EXISTING BUILDING 1,362.0 S.F. 18.4% (4 BEDROOMS) N 1 FROP05ED I5T m m EXISTING FRAME GARAGE 321.0 S.F. 4.3% w FLOOR ADDITION I i (BUILDING OUT PROPOSED COVERED PORCH 62.5 S.F. 0.8% a WHERE EXIST. ASell, PORCH I5) � TOTAL AREA OF ALL STRUCTURES 1745.5 S.F. 23.6% II10.7'6.5' I .7' `� 72, "'MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE ALLONED-20% PROPOSED PROPOSED 2ND V PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR DORMER; I Q PORCH v 1 FLOOR DORMER; REQUIRED 5ETBAGK -�12,1N-8UIL--BIN ABOVE FIRST P O p ABOVE FIRST FLOOR N 1 N FLOOR REQUIRED EXIST. PROPOSED COMPLIES w 100'TRUSTEES w FRONT YARD 35.0' 52.7' 52.7' Y I N N 35'FRONT SETBACK I N m SIDE YARD 10.0' 6.5' 6.5' (EXISTING) EXIST. BOTH 51DE YARDS 25.0' 13.7' 13.7' N Q d I FRAME (EXISTING) it U Lu e-I GARAGE REAR YARD 35.0' 49.1' 49.1' Y } I O I LL W 0 Z <t w 3 51TE LAYOUT NOTES: Q to > 0 1. THI5 I5 AN ARCHITECT'S SITE PLAN 4 15 m Lu m Z pl lO � q SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION BY A LICENSED EXIST. O �' �t �, SURVEYOR. THE INFORMATION w O DRIVE- I� �+ �', r,�° REPRESENTED ON THIS SITE PLAN IS TO THE 0 OIx WAY ARCHITECTS BEST OF KNOWLEDGE. -� M C7 `tea ✓'��° 2.SURVEY INFORMATION WA5 OBTAINED n0. NI6"59'20"N 50.00' �' A �{ t' e`i FROM A SURVEY DATED NOV.23,2021 AND O t ac `r}j,; PREPARED BY: d I• �L � ;' 5 d A LAND SURVEYING INC. BAYSHORE ROAD �y `;_t, i -` PETER A.GROBEN S.xw`�-� �' N.Y.STATE LAND SURVEYOR 41 OP.O.BOXB 4 N ' 4 O RIDGE,NY 11961 a m N (951)640-4899 � M PROPOSED S 1 TE PLAN 0 SCALE: 1'-0" = 20'-0" a a GENERAL SYMBOL KEY: 4 I---� F�. .----,I wo r.3 F--� EXI5TIN6 TO REMAIN NEW FOUNDATION WALL w z m a ma¢aga NEW WOOD FRAME o 3 W o za�w¢�m m 0530�� 5. o w Z w Q Zzz Ll Li Li Li Z= K W U EXIST. oaNmoE- r COVERED z a= FORC r E 36'-3" " Ow OQZmUI oWQ�r�W 0 1I" 12'-0" 21-011-T- 12'-0" Q z wj .. In 0¢O QRa � a r�crirw O w z U 1 0 U m1Q� Ir _1 Q U Q Q a Q S Q NEW DINING ROOM 123 S.F. I— I NEW LIVING ROOM 152 SF. NEW WALK-IN o r - - 7 O O m a F 1 r U Q NEW _ BEDROOM#1 �N 135 SF. -70 iO 4 NEW A KITCHEN iv 235 S.F. 1 LL m 2OyWu� LW LP NNFF9 SF. NEW m > L. p BATHROOM#1 LLI �10'SF. I 50 5F. V W ei* war I in e � in 0 Z m >- Y • i I 1Y2° II" ry O It 0 2 I- q_bu W Q d ORE DI/ LO LLI W T-2" 5 f �- �� � t- X �N a �� a` ;+ J¢ M C'J NEW COVERED ((� `2`Q �S�f ' �� a Q FORCH h. ,I �i in 625 5F. ,> i' 1' �i cr 0 J !tri Ncq 1 calf. Np � ro q._11y2„ 12'_6" 13'�2u o PROPOSED F I RST FLOOR PLAN w w SCALE:5116"= 1'-0' a a OENERAL SYMBOL <EY: LL oLL¢ ww3 1----1 E%ISTIN6 TO REMAIN "= NEW FOUNDATION WALLw o ¢m m ma U �°a¢asa NEW WOOD FRAM o�3w�o JLL�w�� o�wti H F LL O aWF za�ww¢ zz Wo v a O Z �w5 o x a w ww.0oo VIZw FN¢ f r j W O a O x aa�Z�& zZ z o 4� U owp-zy e �p wa Few LLO N q: �..z3¢ < 4 .. ¢zw0cQ7aa o NEW 0 zU Fao s U s w Um w \q in BEDROOM#3 -1`--6'-2" Y w�r o I 198 S.F. ss�.x. n. aawy i i:s a w 0= W= � uNi ox= xa uaaaxax N ' NEW BEDROOM#2 287 S.F. — — NE 14 S.�. NEA WALIN GL. I '" 34 5F. I� 7_3„ NEW n —•-----:—_!N OBATHROOM#2 — ZL. ��+ 95 SF. P m 4' 13 GL. m w U q OFT F — Fi L J Q O 5-3y2" tt1 s NEW NEW FAMILY 5 BATHROOM#3 ROOM/OYM I'. 90 S.F. O – Ibb S.F. i F-2'_I0" _ NEW FAMILY ' n ROOM/6YM ® m 0 212 S.F. p W O w � OL w oz e'_o" 6'-0. Q N O LLJ 0- co z m o w w 4'-S'2"--A�3,�„ ,-?y2" ,�,_I„ 5,�, 4-I' B'-�y23_�6" 3'-�y2 `� .:frt ��• ��-A O n'-Joy. 13'-8" lo'-eS's f Ic CNI FROFOSED SECOND FLOOR FLAN �O ��` ''f M SCALE, 3/16"= I'-0" .. w w Q Q O ENERAL SYMBOL KEY: 4�1 a oWQ W3 ❑W �� - �� EXI5TINS TO REMAIN vz� NEW FOUNDATION WILL w � 3 NEW WOOD FRAME za�w¢m w Z 2 a N U W O O O J_W O ,.z-;.-EN- n: -;.-NWn:w6 0 0= f Z^a�Qa z �z O WU U wWOQ2VIN W� z3a iF�QQQM MUM N w U W Q w z 00 0 N U Q Q a MIr Q 2 EX15T. 51NK _I & CABINETRY TO BE REMOVED (REPLACED WITH A BATHROOM VANITY) I I I 1� OAS. i I 7r, IST. SHOWER BE REMOVED � U Q Q W 00)TA V w Z ir LU Z OIL p D = � TANK W a a m m m w to w J A ILLO IL Nn L"! O � l Q �, y `-Q Lo CNI -fX 03 �0 � 1 0 � o 0 A o DEMOLITION OARAOE PLAN SCALE: 1/4"=V-0" ¢ Q GENER,4L SYMBOL KEY: Wo aF3 EXISTING TO REMAIN NEW FOUNDATION WALL w Z m a ak 3m ww ma¢aga NEN WOOD FRAME zarwam Jw�=gym as=r o.i xrrawLL m�3a�° 0<awwU, aZ1Szz J mw U 0 z= N U m 0.0 w- w w o J w 0 0 z m N d ¢woao= z aaz>>¢ E O [z'JZQO Za w-m r,U Z U cc w 0 a Z N ¢oQ0a 0z3'a R z a J z 13'-x7" a wsw ZF�Fa.w s�ss Q w zw o w U=O U m F o a a aw. a x O ® EX15T. m BATHROOM O -� r GAB. 0.. `9 A�TTIGl H,TGH r U EXIST. BOILER ON g r CONCRETE F- BLOCKS a N N EX15T. _ ONE-GAR GARAGE SLAB Q ON-GRADE Q W 0 0 0) OIL � V rl TANK LL 0 = Z T W Q d �. •., 00 00 w , �E.�D"qtr.,,, ""r p p w M a �At • � o V-2" * 2'-'7" Q! Ag, Ir a cli OF N��� 0 0 PROPOSED 5,ARA0E PLAN w . VALE: 1/4'= I'-0" ¢ a - 2 k � �0: �'� ������ [} ^ \ig Z • . Er w§;/2A EE E�)a + + m m m §}}�0 m ®;;;2§} _W.1-OW_ )°16 ` ¥§[tk§% 4 §§\k2K2 qU T. � 2 � ~� ���--- -�- NE5T ELEVATION (FRONT) 5C : qe . ,.. D00) � � Q � TA LOI O 2 = » - -- - — - - — - p LLIC) 2 � w \ CL mz - m LLJ \ % cq ■ \ . g f \ ;\�. 03740" �O� cv EAST ELEVATION (REAR) 0� N : e = V'' .cn k k IL UX m={ A§Z$[£ )k).0, 12 t \\\\�/ 12 \ /\\//f _ 2!/ §§G<£ƒ 2fr(S�k§z �§§§22! 2°va<H /§KkEK] SOUTH ELEVATION (R|OHT 51DE SCS: 5116" 1' 12 -� 12 2 � w k0) � Q L � Oz m � pLLI ? 2 � w \ } 00U)_ § § LLI ® 4 2 � % @ ) 00 cv 074�� �S ' � NORTH ELEVATION (LEFT 51DE Qppy\ o � SCALE: «e = i-O" 6i k k PROJECT/ ZONING DATA, a � pm • , :Q W W TAX MAP# 1000-53-06-I6 6 o a F-a � ma ZONING DISTRICT R-40 NO S zasu�Iam LOT AREA 0.11 ACRES W o 5 r PECONIC BAY r h m a c COPO - I FAMILY DWELLING Z-2118,03/03/1965 w a MHWM AT THE TIE LINE GOPO -PORCH d BALCONYc 511°06'40"E 50.00' ADDITIONS Z-29188, 10/23/03 z 7 =m Z W W ilil�CO VARIANCE APPROVAL ZBA FILE #1544;10/25/21 a 'F 0. o m n. FE.-,ST.CONCRETE BULKHEAD FEMA FLOOD ZONE X a VE-13 F mza=zti I I WETLANDS DISTRICT Y PENDING o W z}u APPROVAL °cz°Qa z I-43138- °W<or o f DEC DISTRICT Y 02174/0001 J Z Q J R-21-1189 womoa�w I I 3 sMOE SUFFOLK COUNTY Hp APPROVAL BEDROOMS (PENDING FN FN APPROVAL) W s Ntn ¢�¢<I I • � �r?iaaaax II HABITABLE SPACE EXISTING PROP05ED CRAWLSPACE AREA O S.F. 0 S.F. REMOVE EXIST. IDECK AND HOT TUB I FIRST FLOOR AREA 9P1 S.F. 1,058 S.F. TOTAL BEDROOM COUNT 3 3 SECOND FLOOR AREA 916 S.F. 1,253 S.F. ____ I IZONE z 7 1 PROPOSED I LOT COVERAGE ND FLOOR DORMER .p I 36.3' I DESCRIPTION(FOOTPRINT) AREA COVERAGE TOTAL LOT AREA 1396.0 S.F. EXIST.2 STRY WD. FRAME DWELLING EXISTING BUILDING 1362.0 S.F. 184% h (4 BEDROOMS) N 1 PROPOSED 15T mm EXISTING FRAME GARAGE 321.0 S.F. 4.3% FLOOR ADDITION "15'SEAR SETBACK I (BUILDING 04T PROPOSED COVERED PORCH 62.5 S.F. 0.8% . WHERE EXIST. I 3' < PORCH IS) TOTAL AREA OF ALL STRUCTURES 1145.5 S.F. 25.6% I 6.5' mL4 1.2' "MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED -20% PROPOSED 2ND I PORCH PROPOSED Y I PROPOSED 2ND REQUIRED SETBACKS - MAIN BUILDING FLOOR DORMER; -2 QFLOOR DORMER; ABOVE FIRST 1O I O 1(� ABOVE FIRST FLOOR m N FLOOR REQUIRED EXIST. PROPOSED COMPLIES w 100'TRU5TEE5w .1 N N FRONT YARD 35.0' 52 ' 52.1' Y 35FRONT 5ET5 GK uVii 51pE YARD 10.0' 6.5' 6.5' (EXISTING) 1 I I BOTH SIDE YARDS 25.0' 13.1' 13.1' N Q 0)EXIST. I (EXISTIN(S) 0 LJJ r FRAME m 6ARAGE REAR YARD 15.0' 49.1' 49Y (EXISTING) 0 Z � >' gl I m LLI a z of Dil sr. to `n w O _ o 0 0 � I Y NI6"59'20"W 50.00' 0. IV. n 0 46 BAtYSHORE ROAD <c eY o 7Rc 7� Ncq cm V /, YM PROPOSED S 1 TE PLAN 03 i 4 o`J yp� SCALE: I'-O" = 20'-0" N a o a