Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMKS Realty, LLC RESOLUTION 2023-410 �O� o off 7�3 ADOPTED DOCID: 19111 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 2023-410 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON APRIL 25,2023: WHEREAS,the Board of Trustees on December 14, 2022, denied the application of MKS Realty, LLC for a Coastal Erosion Hazard Permit to construct a single-family residence on the premises known as 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold New York,under Town Code Section 111; and WHEREAS, on January 13, 2023 MKS Realty LLC submitted an application requesting an appeal of the said decision of the Board of Trustees to the Town Board of the Town of Southold, in its capacity as the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review,pursuant to Code Section 111-25; and WHEREAS, on February 28, 2023 the Town Board held a public hearing on the appeal of MKS Realty LLC from the denial of the requested Coastal Erosion Hazard Permit,with the opportunity of all interested parties be heard; and WHEREAS,the Town Board thereafter held the application open for a two (2) week period for the purpose of allowing for additional written comment from the applicant and all other interested parties; and WHEREAS,the Town Board has considered the entire record on appeal by MKS Realty LLC for a Coastal Erosion Hazard Permit;now therefore be it RESOLVED,that the Town Board does hereby adopt the written Determination Following Public Hearing dated April 25; 2023; and be it further RESOLVED,that the Town Board, in its capacity as the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review, hereby affirms the December 14, 2022 determination of the Board of Trustees and denies the instant appeal for the reasons set forth in said Determination. Denis Noncarrow Southold Town Clerk RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Brian O. Mealy, Councilman SECONDER:Sarah E.Nappa, Councilwoman AYES: Nappa, Doroski,Mealy, Doherty, Evans,Russell MAY 7 e0a. Office of the Town Attorney Town of Southold Town Hall Annex, 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone : 631-765-1939 Facsimile: 631-765-6639 MEMORANDUM To: Mr. Denis Noncarrow, Town Clerk From: Melissa Mirabelli Secretary to the Town Attorney Date: May 1, 2023 Subject: MKS Realty, LLC — CHEA Determination With respect to the above-referenced matter, I am enclosing the original application with committee comments and resolution of Town Board approval of event. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed, please do not hesitate to call me. Thank you. /mm Enclosures r +t COASTAL EROSION HAZARD BOARD OF REVIEW TOWN BOARD: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -----------------------------------------x In the Matter of the Application of DETERMINATION FOLLOWING PUBLIC HEARING of MKS REALTY, LLC -----------------------------------------x PRESENT: Scott A. Russell, Supervisor Louisa P. Evans, Councilwoman Jill Doherty, Councilwoman Brian O. Mealy, Councilman Greg Doroski, Councilman Sarah E. Nappa, Councilwoman APPLICANT: MKS Realty LLC, c/o Patricia Moore, Esq., 51020 Main Road, Southold,New York. LOCATION: 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold,New York SCTM# 1000-54-04-19 ZONE: R-40 Residence District- Coastal Erosion Hazard Area- VE EL 13 Flood Zone/AE EL 12 Flood Zone RELIEF REQUESTED: Appeal of Administrative Decision of the Board of Town Trustees under Chapter 111 of the Southold Town Code, for proposed two-story dwelling with attached garage, proposed seaward bedroom balcony with rail system; proposed mezzanine level bedroom balcony with rail system; a privacy screen wall along the west side, 6' wide spiral staircase to the ground; raised decking 1,484 square feet with a 448 square foot pool on seaward side; privacy screening along easterly side, 3.9' wide stairs with railing to ground on the west, 3.6' wide stairs with railing to the ground on the east,proposed 10' wide bar/grill area on pool deck, 513 square foot non-pervious front entry stairs, proposed 3,183 square foot stone blend driveway, 1.200 gallon underground propane tank, new I/A OWTS sanitary system with 500 gallon wastewater treatment unit and four (4) 8.5L by 2' effect depth sanitary leaching galleys,public water service connection, new storm water control structures, for roof runoff and driveway runoff, approximately 480 cy of clean material from the excavated areas will be used to fill the site to the proposed grades, all mechanical equipment(i.e.A/C Unit) will be located above the second story structure, all to be located within the VE Flood Zone and Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. DETERMINATION: The administrative determination is Affirmed. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Upon the application of MKS Realty, LLC for a permit to develop this environmentally sensitive vacant parcel within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area(CEHA), the Southold Town Board of Trustees conducted a public hearing on August 17, 2022. The record included the submissions of MKS Realty, LLC in addition to the written comment of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program(LWRP) Coordinator and the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council. On December 14, 2022,the application of MKS Realty LLC for a CEHA permit was denied. In pertinent part, the Trustees denial was based on a determination that the extensive,proposed development would have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the Town, in that it would be located within and cause disturbance to, a protective primary dune. (See, Board of Trustees Determination dated December 27, 2022). MKS Realty LLC now appeals that determination to the Town Board, acting in its capacity as Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review. Unrelated to this proceeding, the record also indicates that the companion application of MKS Realty LLC for a wetlands permit was also denied by the same Board of Trustees action of December 14, 2023 and MKS Realty LLC has filed a court action challenging that determination. In accordance with Town Code Section 111-25, MKS Realty, LLC appealed the denial of its request for a CEHA permit to the Town Board in its capacity as the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review. The public hearing on this request was conducted on February 28, 2023 and thereafter held open for additional written comment. The record includes the underlying record of the Board of Town Trustees, in addition to the multiple written submissions of the applicant including its Application for Appeal Dated January 13, 2023 with attachments and post hearing submission dated March 14, 2023 with attachments. The record also includes the testimony of representatives of MKS Realty LLC, and testimony and written comment of neighboring residents and interested parties. On May 9, 2023,the Board voted unanimously to deny the applicant's appeal, and affirmed the determination of the Town Board of Trustees. DETERMINATION ON APPEAL Upon all of the evidence submitted and the testimony adduced at the public hearing conducted in connection with this application, and upon due deliberation thereon, the Town Board, in its capacity as the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Appeals, hereby finds as follows: FIRST: MKS Realty, LLC seeks to develop an existing vacant parcel located adjacent to the Long Island Sound and is before this Board on appeal from a denial of a CEHA permit from the Town Board of Trustees. The subject parcel measures approximately 58,936 square feet and is entirely within the environmentally sensitive,protective primary dune adjacent to the Long Island Sound. As such, the parcel maintains no as-of-right buildable area as defined by Code Section 280-4 in that no portion of the lot is outside of the primary dune. The proposal of NMS Realty, LLC seeks development wholly within the primary dune of a substantial two-story dwelling including decks,pool and septic system, which would require regrading in the area of development. Applicant does not contest that this collective activity would disturb the protective dune to the landward side of the primary dune ridge. The Board notes that the entire parcel is low lying and the applicant proposes to construct the dwelling at least in part within the high-risk flood prone VE EL 13 Flood Zone. The base flood elevation has been determined to be 18' and the structure is proposed to be constructed on pilings. At the two (2) stories proposed,the structure would be 5,600 square feet in size, it would extend over 100' in length and stand in excess of 53' in height, with utilities increasing the height further by their location on the roof of the structure. SECOND: By decision dated December 17, 2022,the Board of Trustees denied a CEHA permit for applicant's large scale development plan of this Sound front parcel, fmding that the scale of the proposal would have a deleterious effect to the fragile Coastal Erosion Hazard Area, making it more susceptible to erosion by wind, currents and extreme weather conditions. THIRD: The applicant is therefore before the Town Board seeking an appeal from the denial of the Board of Trustees dated December 27, 2022. As such,the application is therefore considered under Section 111 of the Town Code. That Chapter designates the Town Board as the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review, requiring it to decide appeals utilizing the following criteria: A. No reasonable,prudent, alternative site is available. B. All reasonable means and measures to mitigate adverse impacts on natural systems and their functions and values have been incorporated into the activities design at the property owner's expense. C. The development will be reasonably safe from flood and erosion damage. D. The variance requested is the minimum necessary to overcome the practical difficulty or hardship which was the basis for the requested variance. E. Where public funds are utilized, the public benefits must clearly outweigh the long-term adverse effects. [Southold Town Code § 111-20] AVAILABLE, REASONABLY PRUDENT ALTERNATIVE SITES FOURTH: The Board accepts the testimony offered on behalf of the applicant that the proposed development is situated at the southernmost area of the parcel furthest from the Long Island Sound and that there are no other reasonably prudent locations on the parcel to locate the proposed dwelling. ALL REASONABLE MEANS OF MITIGATION HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED FIFTH: Applicant proposes to minimize setbacks to title wetland boundaries and to construct the dwelling on pilings to meet current FEMA requirements. An UA OWTS wastewater treatment system will be utilized. In this regard, applicant's representatives contend that all reasonable means of mitigation have been incorporated into the development plan. SIXTH: This Board accepts that these measures are designed to mitigate adverse impacts. However, such measures are required for all development with proximity to wetlands. Significantly, the parcel in question consists solely of an area within a primary dune. The Board notes that a primary dune is the primary natural protection against flooding and erosion. Large disturbance of such areas has a negative effective on surrounding areas. While the incorporated mitigation attempts to counteract such negative effects, the mitigation cannot limit them entirely. As such,the Board is not satisfied that the proposed mitigation incorporated in applicant's development proposal will adequately protect the subject parcel from the disturbance necessitated by a large-scale development similar to that as proposed by MKS Realty LLC into this primary dune. THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE REASONABLY SAFE FROM FLOOD AND EROSION DAMAGE. SEVENTH: According to applicant's representatives,historic aerials indicate that the primary dune has remained intact for the last 50 years and remains stable in the vicinity of the lot in question. While there have been a number of instances of flooding and damage caused by severe storms, including the breaking away of a residence from its foundation,the primary dune has continued in a landward migration. The Board notes that as part of the proposal the applicant will elevate the proposed structure in accordance with FEMA standards, and the construction will be in accordance ASCE 24-14 flood resistant design and construction methods. Further, that a stormwater management system will be incorporated in instances of rainfall in excess of 2". Upon consideration of the record,the Board is satisfied that the proposed development plan is intended to be reasonably safe from flood and erosion damage. THE VARIANCE REQUESTED IS THE MINIMUM NECESSARY EIGHTH: MKS Realty, LLC contends that the relief requested is the minimum necessary. As noted herein,the large-scale development proposal will be located within the primary dune. The 5,600 square foot residence would extend in excess of 100' in length and be in excess of 53' in height. Applicant concludes that the proposal is the minimum relief necessary but concedes that the development was created by utilizing the setbacks for a standard residential R-40 zone and a front yard setback that it deemed consistent to the area. The only issue at the time of the public hearing, according to applicant's representatives, would be the seaward limit of construction within the primary dune. The Board finds that the scale of development ignores the primary characteristics of the parcel—that it is wholly within a coastal erosion hazard area and a primary dune- and maintains no as-of-right buildable area as defined by Code Section 280-4 in that no portion of the lot is outside of the primary dune. NINTH: In determining the minimum relief necessary, applicant must establish that the size and scale of the development proposal in a protective area is the minimal relief necessary to overcome the hardship or practical difficulty. MKS Realty LLC has failed to do so and the record is devoid of any consideration of a less significant variance to overcome the stated hardship. As proposed,the residence would be the two times larger than most existing similarly situated residential structures. Applicant's representatives assert that the size of the proposed residence is consistent with the overall square footage of the parcel. Specifically,that the proposed lot coverage of 14.7% is consistent to the area, calculated by the 8,681 square feet of the total lot area that will be affected by this development. The Board rejects this contention as it ignores the environmentally sensitive nature of the proposal. TENTH: The Board finds that a 5,600 square foot dwelling with an overall height in excess of 53' feet and length in excess of 100' does not constitute the minimum variance necessary. ELEVENTH: Further,the Board notes that the neighborhood in question was established prior to the identification of coastal erosion hazard areas and without the benefit of refined knowledge concerning the sensitive nature of coastal areas and negative impacts of development of such areas, including erosion and flooding. The recent regularity and intensity of destructive storms only highlight these issues. As a result,pre-existing structures, setbacks and lot coverages are not considered precedent for the subject application as they pre-exist the code and CEHA requirements and the increased knowledge of the damaging effects of development in such areas. TWELFTH: This Board has considered its prior action, some 12 years ago, in granting relief for a CEHA permit for a parcel to the west of the subject and does not find it to be controlling here (In the Matter of Bombara, 1725 North Sea Drive, Southold issued January 4, 2011). Initially, the Board notes that the natural features and landward toe of the primary dune were more readily identifiable, allowing the limits of development to be more easily identifiable. Most significantly, however, is that the breath and scope of the development proposed here is inconsistent with the 1,700 square foot footprint the Board approved in Bombara. CONCLUSION In accordance with the powers vested with this Board pursuant to §220-24 of the Code, as the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review,to hear, approve with modification or deny requests for variances or to affirm, wholly or partly, or modify the order,requirement, decision, or determination of the Administrator, by written decision, after public hearing, the Board hereby concludes as follows: The Administrative determination of the Board of Trustees is hereby affirmed. Applicant's proof failed to establish that that all responsible means and measures to mitigate adverse impacts on natural systems and their functions and values have been incorporated into the activities design or that the variance requested is the minimum necessary to overcome the practical difficulty or hardship which was the basis for the requested variance. Therefore, upon motion duly made and seconded, the members of the Board present and having voted to affirm the administrative decision of the Board of Trustees and deny the appeal,the application is accordingly denied. Dated: April 25, 2023 Scott A Russell, Supervisor 1 1 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK 2 ------------------------------------------- X 3 TOWN BOARD PUBLIC HEARING 4 MKS REALTY, LLC ------------------------------------------- X 5 6 7 February 28, 2023 8 10 : 00 A.M. 9 10 11 B E F 0 R E : 12 13 SCOTT A. RUSSELL, SUPERVISOR 14 LOUISA P. EVANS, JUSTICE 15 JILL DOHERTY, COUNCILWOMAN 16 BRIAN 0. MEALY, COUNCILMAN 17 GREG DOROSKI, COUNCILMAN 18 SARAH E . NAPPA, COUNCILMAN 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 1 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: We just 2 opened the Public Hearing with reference to 3 the mitigation appeal . I am going to ask 4 that anybody that would like to come up and 5 address the Town Board, please feel free. 6 I am sorry, Councilman Doroski has to read 7 a series of legal requirements. 8 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : Just 9 want to go through all of the documentation 10 that we have received through the lead up 11 to this . So in this, we have the 12 application itself from MKS Realty to the 13 Town Board. We have an affidavit from them 14 that they posted the signage on the 15 property itself. It is signed by the 16 applicant' s attorney, Pat Moore. We have a 17 letter that is the same . We have a letter 18 of opposition that we have received from 19 one of the neighbors that is outlining four 20 individual issues that they foresee with 21 this application. We have an affidavit 22 that the legal notice was published in 23 Suffolk Times . We have a copy of the legal 24 notice itself. We have the notice of the 25 Public Hearing and a affidavit signed by 3 1 the Town Clerk affirming that it was posted 2 on the back bulletin board. And a copy of 3 an invoice and affidavit that it was in the 4 Suffolk Times . Then we have the whole 5 Coastal Erosion application and appeal 6 file. That is what we got. 7 MS . PAT MOORE: When I start, I 8 want to introduce everybody to you. So 9 first and foremost, Anthony -- 10 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Excuse 11 me . Can you just state your name, Pat, for 12 the record? 13 MS . PAT MOORE: I am sorry. 14 Patricia Moore, attorney for the applicant. 15 The people that are here, just raise your 16 hands, so they know. We have Anthony 17 Varnou and Martella Varnou. They are the 18 property owners . Just a little bit about 19 them so you know. This is going to be 20 their home. They have three children. All 21 under 10 . The youngest being 1 . The 22 youngest being 10 . They also are a 23 caretaker of a cousin, a first cousin that 24 is developmentally disabled and that 25 individual is part of their nucleus family 4 1 and also is with them when he is not in a 2 special school. I also have with me Edward 3 Licazi . He is the architect. Raise your 4 hand. There you go. Other that you know, 5 of course. Doug Adams from Young & Young. 6 Doug is here. Also Kelly Risoto who is the 7 Senior Ecologist IS Manager for Land Use 8 Ecological Services. That' s Kelly. We 9 might have others on Zoom, but I can' t see 10 from this distance. And they will most 11 likely listen. I don' t know if John 12 Armentano is listening in. He was going to 13 come, but I am not sure . The weather. So 14 to start off with, I don' t want to read 15 through my application. You don' t need me 16 to read to you. So that is one of the 17 things that I prefer not to do . I think to 18 begin with, we do have people in the 19 audience. Just to understand here for the 20 purpose of the public. I know you know why 21 we are here. We are here on an appeal from 22 the Coastal Erosion Board. An appeal to 23 the Town Board sitting as a Coastal Erosion 24 Board. And this I will read just for the 25 record. The Coastal Erosion Hazard Law, a 5 1 Coastal Erosion Board to grant variance 2 relief from the standards of Chapter 111 . 3 Town Code 111-24 . The law recognizes that 4 strict application of the standards of this 5 chapter may cause practical difficulty or 6 unnecessary hardship. That is the 7 standards and restrictions may be varied, 8 modified if certain criteria are met . Then 9 there are criteria in which we will go into 10 great detail . I will have Kelly go over 11 the issues . The first being that no 12 reasonable prudent alternative is 13 available. This is our only property. All 14 responsible -- responsible means to 15 mitigate adverse impacts and natural system 16 and their functions and values have been 17 incorporated into the activities design of 18 the property owners expense. Clearly that 19 is our application. In this case, there 20 has been a great deal of mitigation and 21 design and incorporation based on the Town 22 Board' s prior precedent. Unfortunately, 23 for Mr. Bombara who took four years of a 24 saga to get his house, you live and learn. 25 You read through their record and you -- if 6 1 you can, adopt and intergrade and 2 incorporate all of the conditions and 3 recommendations that this Board as a Board, 4 as an appear Board, as well as, the 5 Trustees incorporated in the Bombara 6 decision. That is the most -- I want to 7 call it our road map term. But that is our 8 road map. We don' t three more years to get 9 to the point of incorporating all of the 10 recommendations that have previously been 11 required. The development will be 12 reasonably safe from floods, erosion 13 damage. The variance request is necessary 14 to overcome the practical difficulties of 15 the hardship, which was the basis of the 16 variance. And then finally, where public 17 funds are utilized. That is not 18 applicable. So we will just skip over 19 that. I like visuals . I am a very visual 20 person. And I put on in front of you 21 aerials . Thank you to Kelly because with 22 the GIS being expert in that, she was able 23 to provide these aerials. The first being 24 a birds eye view of North Sea Drive. In 25 particular, the northern area. The 7 1 waterfront lots on North Sea Drive. The 2 second aerial that I had is a more detailed 3 aerial giving lot size that are contiguous 4 to our property. The square footage, the 5 first is the house square footage. The 6 second square footage is the overall square 7 footage, which incorporates the decking. 8 So when you get to that, we will look at it 9 again carefully. As you can see from this 10 aerial, North Sea Drive is very well 11 developed. I don' t -- is that the right 12 one because ours goes further to the west. 13 The one that I just submitted. There we 14 go . Thank you. So you can see -- and what 15 Kelly did was provide the -- we will call 16 it the seaward line of development. Yellow 17 hash line that goes -- starts on the east 18 side by Penny Road -- Penny' s Beach. 19 Pardon me. And then it goes along. And as 20 you can see, the Bombara property and our 21 property most landward of all the houses . 22 And again, the seaward development line 23 goes toward the water. And then 24 substantially towards the water. Many of 25 these homes that are very close to the 8 1 water, predate Coastal Erosion. I 2 acknowledge that. This is well developed 3 area that has been developing prior to 4 zoning and then through the 70 ' s, prior to 5 Coastal Erosion. Then there was a lot of 6 redevelopment in the 90 ' s . And early 2000 . 7 Most of the redevelopment -- and I have -- 8 if you want more information, I can provide 9 it after. I just didn' t think here today 10 you needed more paper. I actually pulled 11 all the permits of all the houses from this 12 -- from Penny' s Beach, based on the tax 13 numbers, to the west. And to the extent 14 that the Building Department has this 15 information, many of the homes today would 16 be considered a demo reconstruction. At 17 the time that they were done in the 90 ' s 18 particular. They could do substantial 19 additions. The 50% rule didn' t apply 20 probably the next closest redevelopment is 21 John Betsch' s . I see him here. I know him 22 well . Beautiful house. He worked hard to 23 get that property. He did go through 24 permit process. The Board had to give a 25 variance, Coastal Erosion variance. There 9 1 was a house there. The house that was 2 there was demolished. And a new house, 3 this house was built. That is the next in 4 line of the most recent development on the 5 street. The Betsch house also gives little 6 bit of extra guidance on the Coastal 7 Erosion appeal. We incorporated those 8 recommendations. Mostly it was an 9 acknowledgement of facing a house on piles, 10 addressed the flooding issue. Drywalls, 11 drainage. Everything. It was a much 12 lesser conditions than the Betsch 13 application. Nonetheless, the Board did 14 its job and did a review. 15 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Can I 16 interrupt you? 17 MS . PAT MOORE: Of course. 18 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: You 19 have all these lines, do you have a map 20 showing where the Coastal Erosion Line is? 21 MS . PAT MOORE: Yes . 22 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Can 23 you tell us -- 24 MS . PAT MOORE: Well, I can tell 25 you without even looking. The Coastal 10 1 Erosion Line is at North Sea Drive. It is 2 the landward side of everybody' s property. 3 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Okay. 4 MS . PAT MOORE: The DEC when they 5 had mapped this area, they placed the line 6 there. Interestingly enough, I know from 7 -- my personal knowledge from a client that 8 was in another -- where North Sea -- no. 9 Not North Sea Drive. In Mattituck, where 10 Coastal Erosion Line was being drawn. And 11 I forget, he was a dentist. 12 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: I 13 remember. 14 MS . PAT MOORE: You remember him? 15 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Yeah. 16 MS . PAT MOORE: He on his own, God 17 Bless him. On his own, went to the DEC 18 hearing and pushed the DEC to move the line 19 and establish it seaward of his 20 neighborhood. That is why that 21 neighborhood didn' t have to deal with the 22 kind of difficulty. 23 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Well, 24 there is some big differences between that 25 neighborhood and this one too as well . 11 1 Still -- 2 MS . PAT MOORE: Environmentally, 3 it ' s still the same. But that is -- we are 4 not going to go there. As a matter of 5 course, this community was very well 6 developed when the Coastal Erosion Law was 7 adopted. And here we are. So I also -- I 8 want based on this aerial and you can see, 9 we will get to the next one shortly. You 10 can see that the size of this property is 11 at least double the size of every lot, 12 waterfront lot on North Sea Drive. Most of 13 the lots on North Sea Drive -- the second 14 exhibit actually has square footages from 15 the Town record. They range -- they 16 generally over 1/2 acres . The square 17 footage may depend on the knee high water 18 or not. Generally the Assessors have a 19 size of the property or the surveyors use 20 the size of the property. Most of them are 21 anywhere -- from the smallest being 19, 950 . 22 Almost 20, 000 . To slightly over 25, 000 . 23 John Betsch' S house is probably -- the 24 property is lot 26, 676 . Most of them is in 25 that range. Our property is 58, 936. That 12 1 is just a few square feet than 60, 000 . 2 This is an R-40 . So we have a conforming 3 lot . As you know, R-40 is 40, 000 . So we 4 are more than double the size of zoning 5 requirements. I take it back. One and a 6 half times zoning requirements. And at 7 this point, we are proposing to develop as 8 far as away. Protecting the shore line as 9 possible. Arguably at no cost of the town 10 -- they are going to be taxed. It' s going 11 to be a valuable piece of property, and the 12 Town is getting 23, 000 which is the size of 13 any one of these properties as undisturbed 14 open space. So this deice has been very 15 carefully developed or proposed for 16 development. Again, at no cost of the 17 Town, we are preserving a tremendous amount 18 of this property. All consistent with the 19 Coastal Erosion Law and consistent with our 20 appeal . So if you look at the second 21 exhibit that we have. That shows you the 22 square footages. And you know, the bubble 23 over the head of the Trustees and maybe 24 anyone else, this is too big of a house. 25 No . When you look at one, the size of the 13 1 property, the square footages of the 2 neighboring properties, we would comply -- 3 even though it ' s not applicable since we 4 started way before the gross floor area 5 law. We would comply with that law from -- 6 based on what our project is today. And 7 you can see that -- so we' re starting over 8 on the east side next to Kenny' s Beach. 9 You have John Betsch' s house, which is 10 shown as the house square footage, 2, 607 . 11 With decks . , 3 . 512 . So again, his is one 12 of the bigger lots but it also have one of 13 the larger footprints. We ' re using the 14 percentage based on the actual lot. So 15 we ' re -- we ' re comparing apples to apples . 16 The development of the Betsch property is 17 13 . 20 of the overall property. As you go 18 towards the west. Some of these homes are 19 additions, alterations. They are slightly 20 smaller. Some of them have smaller houses 21 but larger decks . It ' s a very seasonable 22 summer community. Some of these people 23 have yards . We have proposed a yard that 24 -- has grass -- sorry, play areas . We have 25 none. Our entire area is going to be 14 1 natural and re-vegetated. So essentially 2 what you have is the house and the deck and 3 the kids will -- they have to live in that 4 area. They take the pathway of the beach. 5 That is the extent of the activity on this 6 property. All activity is within the 7 confines of the existing structure or 8 proposed structure, pardon me. The house 9 next to us is a smaller lot . Again, 20, 000 10 square feet. The house size is smaller. 11 The overall decks are overall smaller. 12 Interestingly, that house is preexisting. 13 The moment one of somebody either the 14 family or a future owner, acquires that 15 house, it doesn' t conform with FEMA 16 standards. There reality is and why you 17 have seen so much development on North Sea 18 Drive, Coastal Erosion and flood zone 19 applications require the houses to be 20 elevated on piles . As soon as you do that, 21 it ' s a lot of construction. A lot of 22 raising. So the construction process of 23 building enough in a Coastal area, 24 logically requires more square footage. 25 Again, because everything is up and your 15 1 living space and activities are all 2 occurring on your structures. So going 3 further west, the houses are all 4 proportionately sized. Our property is 5 58, 000 . So our development is 7 . 90 . 6 Clearly that is less and comparable in fact 7 to some of the smaller properties. So our 8 neighbor to the east is 7 . 6 . That is teeny 9 little cottage but on a small lot. So our 10 development is proportional to the 11 property. That is what I want to emphasize 12 here. Because the bubble over everyone' s 13 head, is that, oh, you' re building too 14 much. No, we ' re building -- we have a very 15 large piece of property. It ' s -- and it ' s 16 proportion. Under 80 . At this point, let 17 me -- one more item that I just want to 18 show you, and then I will leave it with the 19 Board. Here is the house, the proposed 20 house. Here is our development lot. 21 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Based 22 on what? 23 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Based on -- 24 thank you. I am glad you asked. Doug Adams 25 who is more familiar with how the line was 16 1 drawn, but again, taking from Bombara. 2 During the Bombara application, the process 3 and I don' t know if any of you have had a 4 chance to review the entire record there. 5 It ' s very length. 6 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: I lived 7 it . 8 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Yes . Sorry 9 about that. So the Trustees denied the first 10 application. They came back a year later and 11 came in with a completely different 12 application. At that point, Pete Donowski 13 was their lawyer. They have Chachoonian. 14 They had other experts with them. Doug Adams 15 and Young & Young. They -- and the Town had 16 their own expert. They probably got together 17 in the third or fourth year of the process 18 finally. And they looked at the topography 19 of the property. The environmental 20 conditions of the property and they 21 established what -- I have to read it because 22 there is extra words that I am not used to 23 saying. They identified the most landward 24 natural protected feature on the site. The 25 landward geomorphic toe and landward 17 1 regulatory of the sand ridge and the Dune was 2 identified. It was plotted by Young & Young 3 surveyors. Based on that, vegetation is 4 pretty much one continuous vegetation. You 5 don' t have property line when you' re dealing 6 with vegetation and the geology. So they 7 took the line. They applied the standards 8 and how the line was established on the 9 Bombara property and they carried it over to 10 this property. The red line that I just 11 showed you is our environmental line. Kind 12 of the don' t go pass this line. Take all 13 your dimensions and all your instruction 14 development landward of that line. And that 15 is one of the things that we want to 16 establish for sure with the Board today. If 17 we get nothing else accomplished, we need to 18 get that line established because everything 19 derives from that line. We design. We have 20 our setbacks. All of it is based on that 21 line. So we -- in working with the Trustees 22 and very early in the process, Ed -- and I 23 don' t know who else, but certainly Ed was out 24 there with the Trustees. And their initial 25 reaction was, "Oh, there is Bombara. Okay. 18 1 Do what Bombara did and you shouldn' t have 2 any issues . " Or at least that was kind of in 3 the shortcut. You know how the Trustees 4 speak. And Trustees speak, it ' s about a line 5 and you have to interpret a lot from that 6 line. So based on that interpretation, 7 again, they went back and redesigned. At 8 time, the Trustees set it for a hearing or 9 reviewed the application. We get an e-mail . 10 Not even a full communication. We had the 11 original site inspection that had a list of 12 things . And it ' s in the full record. But it 13 wasn' t -- it wasn' t a big deal . It wasn' t a 14 lot of stuff. It was all things that we 15 incorporate and agreed with. So Ed went 16 back, the clients wear back to the drawing 17 board and redesigned. They said push the 18 pool back. We pushed the pool back. Push 19 all the development forward, yes, we did. 20 They used that crazy pier line which does not 21 exist in the Town Code and every time that 22 some one would step up -- and poor Kelly was 23 at some of the hearings. They said what 24 about (gibberish) pier line? And she went, 25 what? What are you talking about? It 19 1 doesn' t exist. Nevertheless, the bubble over 2 the head. I said, this is what they mean by 3 pier line. They did it. They drew a line 4 from the house from the west. They drew a 5 line. All within, again, inside a red line 6 of no development past that point. So we did 7 everything that they asked and here we are. 8 We would hope with the Board, we proceed with 9 the appeal and hopefully get the appeal from 10 this Board. We can return to the Trustees 11 and hopefully get them to agree with us . So 12 at this point, I think you heard enough from 13 me . I am going to have Doug just speak to 14 your question regarding -- 15 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Before 16 you do that. I just have a question? 17 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Sure. 18 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Do you 19 have a copy of the denial? From the Coastal 20 Erosion? 21 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Sure. 22 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Am I 23 missing it in the packet that you gave me? 24 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: It should be 25 there. But I will certainly -- oh, yeah, 20 1 it ' s an exhibit. It ' s Exhibit B. Let me see 2 -- No, I am sorry. Exhibit B is Bombara. 3 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : For the 4 record, we have it here. Missy will make a 5 copy. 6 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: I just 7 didn' t get a chance to look it up. 8 MR. PAUL DECHANCE: For the record, 9 it was not included in your appeal to the 10 Board. 11 MR. DOUG ADAMS : Good morning. 12 Doug Adams . Just a point of clarification, 13 Young & Young has been reorganized to Young & 14 Associates. They think of us as Young & 15 Young. You can keep calling us . We like the 16 name. One of the things that I think is 17 important here is understanding that we did 18 try to mimic the characterization of the 19 landward toe to the most landward beach-ridge 20 as Rob did here. I met with them a couple of 21 times on that property and I have met a 22 couple of times on this property as well . 23 And we surveyed this property. And basically 24 when you try to do something like this -- I 25 am also a geologist. You need to consider a 21 1 few things . It ' s not very cut and dry. You 2 have to consider vegetation, topography. And 3 actually the proximity to the toe to the 4 crest. And the lines in this map, which 5 isn' t covered and we can show it to you 6 again. It ' s the crest of the landward 7 beach-ridge. So on the Bombara piece, the 8 land is a little bit easier to determine the 9 lay ward toe that we ' re talking about because 10 the grades are pretty dramatic and the 11 vegetation was pretty different. And the 12 difference in vegetation that we ' re talking 13 about here is basically mature vegetation and 14 not so much mature vegetation. Vegetation 15 that is young is obviously typically hasn' t 16 been there that long. That part of the 17 beach-ridge would still be experiencing some 18 movement. Where it ' s mature vegetation is 19 less so . So on the eastern portion of our 20 property, as we get closer to the eastern 21 property line, there is certainly more mature 22 vegetation that gets further and further away 23 from the road which is why you see the red 24 lines sort of a little bit further from the 25 North Sea Drive. So we follow this edicks 22 1 (phonetic) and stayed within some proximity 2 of the crest, the vegetation and with the 3 topography. And that is basically how we did 4 it . I am also available for any questions or 5 concerns about the stability of the dune, 6 beach-ridge or any other creations you might 7 have or flooding or anything like that. 8 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : I have a 9 question. But I don' t know, do we want to do 10 questions now or wait till everyone comments? 11 How do -- I guess maybe before we get too far 12 from this, Pat mentioned the idea that the 13 applicant was preserving open space. I don' t 14 see an application in here with the Land 15 Preservation Department to preserve open 16 space. 17 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Sir, I used 18 open space in the very generic sense. 19 Undeveloped. We ' re not donating. 20 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: What we 21 would ordinarily call a yard. 22 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Yes . Well, 23 yard in that it ' s still privately owned and 24 completely left in its natural state. 25 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : Thank 23 1 you. 2 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Holly (sic) 3 Risotto is our environmental expert. She can 4 introduce herself and her background. 5 MS . KELLY RISOTTO: Good morning 6 everybody. Kelly Risoto with Land Use 7 Archaeological Services. I have been a GIS 8 manager with them for 26 years now. I can' t 9 believe that. Basically our job on the 10 project here was to assess the existing site 11 conditions and develop -- native planting 12 plan, which is part of your packet. So I 13 will just go through those things . And then 14 also as part of the Coastal Erosion hazard 15 area and the question of, you know, potential 16 of flooding and erosion, we looked at 17 historical aerials going back about 65 years . 18 To see -- to assess the beach and dune 19 change. To determine what the site 20 conditions are. So basically, with reference 21 to what Pat gave you earlier, the property 22 is, as you know, undeveloped right now. 23 Largely undisturbed. There is some wildlife 24 paths and things through the site. The 25 northern, approximately a third of the 24 1 property is un-vegetated beach habitat. The 2 central third of the site is vegetated dune 3 habitat that as herbaceous species . Beach 4 grass, beach pee, coastal grass . Some salty. 5 And then there is a large patch in the center 6 of the site going east-west Riverest Rose and 7 some Bayberry. The southern third of this 8 site and again, approximately, has similar, 9 Bayberry, Beach Plum. And then you get 10 trees, Eastern Red Cedar, Post-Oak. And the 11 herbaceous vegetation there is fairly sparse. 12 Mainly coastal grass . And then unfortunately 13 you get to non-native invasive species along 14 the road. Black Locust, autumn olive, mixed 15 with the Post-Oak and Red Cedar. So we took 16 that sort of vegetation assessment with the 17 site plan and developed a native planting 18 plan for the project that basically one, 19 preserves the Northern two-thirds of the 20 site. So the entirety of the dune habitat of 21 the property. And as Pat mentioned, almost 22 23, 000 square feet of the existing dune 23 habitat. That will be preserved in its 24 natural state. We vetted the homeowners oath 25 to the beach through an existing wildlife 25 1 path where there is no vegetation. So we 2 don' t have to disturb anything. There is 3 also a strip along the east side that will be 4 preserved where you have some of those trees . 5 Eastern Red Cedar and Post-Oak. The rest of 6 the site where we have the development, as 7 Pat had mentioned, everything is not 8 structure will be planted with the same or 9 similar native species that is similar to 10 whatever is already out there. So we will be 11 planting. I don' t know if you' re looking at 12 the plan, but there is an area where we ' re 13 calling the proposed shrub herbaceous buffer 14 that will have the same tree and shrub 15 species found on the site, as well as, the 16 same beach grass and coastal panic grass with 17 some Tea (inaudible) thrown in there as well 18 for some color and some fun. Over the 19 sanitary system -- 20 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Just a few 21 seconds . Because I want to -- they have in 22 front of them, that is in fact in your 23 packet. The plan is the second page is a 24 colored plan. And she is referring to that. 25 They can follow along. Yes, that is in your 26 1 case not colored. 2 MS . KELLY RISOTTO: I have some 3 extras if you want? 4 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Does anybody 5 want? 6 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: Sure. 7 MS . KELLY RISOTTO: While Pat is 8 handing those out, I will keep moving and 9 keep talking. Over to the sanitary system 10 and adjacent to the structure, we have just 11 an herbaceous buffer proposed. So trees and 12 shrubs . Suffolk County Health Department 13 does not -- they have new requirements now 14 that do now allow vegetation with roots . So 15 that it -- those things can affect the 16 system. So over the sanitary, we just have 17 herbaceous and then again, right along, we 18 don' t have any. Mainly for safety and 19 maintenance. Things like that. But it is 20 the same native species that we proposed 21 throughout the rest of the proposed area. We 22 are preserving and restoring about 800 of the 23 property with this plan. Even with the 24 construction. So the next thing that we did 25 take a look at, and that is also in the 27 1 project narrative. There is two colored 2 exhibits that show -- each -- seaward dune 3 vegetation over time. I looked at aerials 4 going back to 1957 . Periodically. 1957, 5 1971, 1994 . 2013, which was -- that aerial 6 is from 2013 . So about 6 months after Sandy. 7 And then again, in 2020, which was the most 8 recent high resolution aerial publicly 9 available. The gist of that analysis both 10 the beach and dune are stable. Change over 11 time is minimal . There has not been a 12 significant landward migration. As a matter 13 of fact, the narrowest beach was, was 14 following Superstorm Sandy. And since that 15 time it has recreated another 40 feet 16 depending on the location, since that storm. 17 Based on -- if you compare 1957 to 2020, the 18 beach is actually at its widest. Similarly 19 with the vegetated dune, it expanded. At the 20 site, it has expanded north. About 50 to 70 21 feet. 1957, An similar to the beach, it ' s 22 currently at its widest since that time. I 23 would like to point out, if you look at the 24 aerials as well, in 1957, there was very 25 minimal development in the area. So these 28 1 not only expand natural change, but North Sea 2 Drive over time and to current. The current 3 is the widest beach and dune. So when we 4 talk about whether this site is reasonably 5 setting an erosion, we have a long term 6 assessment showing that this is a stable 7 area. This is not an area that is 8 chronically eroding. You know, such as some 9 of the beaches and dunes on the South Shore 10 that get nourished over time. This is a 11 stable area. Even after development. Most 12 of which is seaward to where we ' re proposing 13 a development. So I can go into the 14 standards and impacts and mitigations and 15 proposal to reduce the impacts . First off, 16 potential impacts, are minimized. Siting 17 everything, house and vegetation landward. 18 As you saw in the aerials that Pat showed, 19 especially the one showing the length of 20 North Sea, this house is proposed as the most 21 landward line, with the landward most homes 22 on North Sea Drive. It is in line with the 23 development east and west, which are also 24 landward most to North Sea Drive. Potential 25 impacts to water quality are minimized. By 29 1 one, using the most innovative wastewater 2 treatment system and sanitary waste. By 3 maintaining the vegetated buffer which is 4 approximately 100 to 120 feet wide. 5 Depending on where you' re measuring from. 6 Again, siting everything as far landward. 7 Also storm management proposed on the site as 8 well . So all of those things really minimize 9 impacts to water quality. There was an issue 10 raised, I think with the Trustees, about 11 shorebird nesting. So there is documented 12 shorebird nesting to the east or west. None 13 to my knowledge at this site. Again, the 14 entirety of the beach will be preserved and a 15 100 foot buffer between the beach and 16 structures with natural preservation will be 17 preserved. If you look at North Sea Drive, 18 there are certainly homes closer than that. 19 Beach walkers unfortunately and people that 20 walk their dogs on the beach unleashed result 21 in more disturbance to shorebirds then the 22 proposed residents would. Again, as the 23 landward most residents of North Sea Drive. 24 And again, I did get into the buffer quite a 25 bit. So getting into the variance standards 30 1 now that Pat had mentioned earlier. The 2 first one being no reasonable alternative 3 site is available. The owners own this one 4 piece of property in Southold. They don' t 5 have other sites . They don' t own any 6 contiguous sites . This is it . So there is 7 no other place for them to build a residence. 8 Everything is pushed as far landward as 9 possible. So no alternative location on this 10 property to build the structures. So we have 11 looked at various configurations, everything, 12 and everything is as far landward as 13 possible. All reasonable means and measures 14 to mitigate impacts on (inaudible) their 15 functions and values have been made into the 16 design at the property owners expense. 17 Again, is as landward as possible. The 18 setback of the proposed structure to knee 19 high water is 213 feet. Probably not a whole 20 lot of properties that can say that, that are 21 right on the water. It' s a significant 22 setback. And they are setback from the dune 23 crest 35 feet. The dune crest -- that native 24 planting plan that Pat passed out, the dune 25 crest is the -- shown on their for clarity in 31 1 black and -- so the minimum setback is 35 2 feet. The center is quite a bit more than 3 that. We are planting the entirety of the 4 site with native vegetation. Overall, this 5 design preserves and protects 67 . 4% in its 6 current natural state. And restores another 7 12 . 6% with native vegetation. So 80% of this 8 site will naturally vegetated or native beach 9 habitant when the project is done. And 10 finally, as I mentioned earlier, the beach 11 and dune have been stable going back at least 12 65 years through the development of North Sea 13 Drive. The next standard, the development 14 will be reasonably safe from flooding and 15 erosion damage. So not only are they stable 16 here, but some of the standards that we 17 typically use for this variance criteria are 18 set back from knee high water. From the 19 waters of Long Island Sound, 213 feet. 20 Significant setback. The structures will be 21 elevated by FEMA requirements, as not only 22 FEMA requirements but the State and local 23 building codes . And they are all going to be 24 designed and built in accordance with the 25 flood and design construction standards, 32 1 ASTE-24-13 . So with all of those things, the 2 property and the project is considered to be 3 reasonably safe from flooding and erosion. 4 The next standard and I guess the final 5 standard since there are no public funds 6 utilized, one of the variance requested is 7 the minimum necessary to overcome the 8 difficulties, which is the reason we ' re 9 requesting the variance. The sea line here 10 that goes to the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line 11 is along North Sea Drive. So the entire site 12 is within the sea half. There is no 13 alternative. No location that is out of the 14 Coastal Erosion Hazard Area and therefore no 15 alternative that would eliminate the need for 16 a variance. When we looked at the design of 17 the project, as Pat mentioned, we looked at 18 house sizes along and within 500 feet of the 19 property. The existing dwellings within that 20 500 foot radius are range from 1, 559 square 21 feet to 2, 607 square feet, on lots that are 22 19, 950 square feet and 26, 767 square feet. 23 We ' re proposing a house that is 2, 450 square 24 feet. So in the middle, in that range -- 25 within that range. We are right within the 33 1 character of the neighborhood. And that is 2 visibly shown on the exhibits that Pat shown 3 earlier. So the next is, again, preservation 4 and restoration of 39, 700 square feet of 5 property. Larger than any of the lots that 6 within 500 linear feet. We ' re preserving 7 more area than those lots . Maximizing 8 setbacks to knee high water, the dune crest. 9 Maximizing that area that is preserved. 10 We ' re not proposing any lawn areas . There 11 are some properties along North Sea Drive 12 that have front yards between the house and 13 the road. That is not going to happen here. 14 The entirety of the site, again, will be 15 planted with native vegetation. Once the 16 construction is complete. And then finally, 17 the sanitary system, the Nitrogen treatment 18 sanitary systems, while they' re great for 19 water area, they do take up a whole system. 20 So we had to design around that and keep that 21 in mind in terms of the area of disturbance 22 and grading and things of that nature. That 23 is it as far as the standards goes . If 24 anyone has any questions or Pat, if you want 25 to say anything else? 34 1 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: You did a very 2 thorough job addressing all the standards. 3 And I think we would like to be able to 4 answer any questions that you might have or 5 the public. 6 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : I guess 7 before -- this may be -- I don' t know who to 8 direct this question to, but we ' re talking a 9 lot about the ridge line of the dune. I 10 guess the way that I see it, the Trustees 11 rejection is kind of two-fold. One is, 12 related to its location and hazard area. And 13 the other is related to its location within a 14 natural protective feature area. And the 15 natural protective feature area, as I 16 understand it, is the dune . So is it your 17 contention that the dune stops at the crest 18 -- and I guess I am just trying to understand 19 -- 20 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: That requires 21 a geologist to explain this one . 22 MR. DOUG ADAMS : Hi again, with 23 Bombara for example, I believe if you look 24 through the examples there, the idea that 25 this landward beach ridge, landward toe or 35 1 dune were -- the purpose of that was to call 2 out where the feature -- not the feature 3 area. The feature area would be seaward of 4 that, but that natural protective feature, 5 the most landward part of that would be that 6 -- that toe . That landward toe of the 7 feature. So Bombara for example, that was 8 there new line. I don' t want to call it that 9 but that is sort of like a locally 10 jurisdictional -- kind of like where a 11 wetland, you hear the wetlands and then 12 somebody comes in and flags it . Where you 13 have somebody flag the wetlands to find the 14 exact same location of it . And I think that 15 is what the intent was on Bombara, which is 16 we extrapolated that philosophy from the 17 property to come up with the same -- sort of 18 idea here, that this red line as we said 19 before, is the -- sort of -- what we ' re going 20 to use as the limit of the natural protective 21 feature and area which would be north of 22 that. 23 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : Maybe 24 this is as much as philosophical question as 25 anything. But a dune is three dimensional; 36 1 right? 2 MR. DOUG ADAMS : Right. 3 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : And what 4 would prevent you from drawing the same line 5 on a dune in the reverse direction? As there 6 is a crest, you have the seaward side but you 7 also have the landward side of that feature? 8 MR. DOUG ADAMS : So we ' re talking 9 about the landward side feature. Here -- in 10 this case, it would be at the back of the 11 beach end. Where the dune would start. And 12 at some point, you have upland. So you have 13 to go to another dune or protective feature. 14 The sea ha law I guess you would call it, is 15 -- the natural protective feature would be 16 the seaward most natural protective feature. 17 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : What I am 18 trying to do here to clarify. It seems like 19 there is two separate issues . There is the 20 sea-ha line, which is the Coastal Erosion 21 Hazard area. And that is a defined area but 22 there is also this natural protective feature 23 area, which seems to me -- and I could be 24 wrong here. Like it ' s something different. 25 MR. DOUG ADAMS : The sea-ha, the 37 1 Coastal Erosion Hazard area -- they call it a 2 CR Hazard Map. And they drew a line on that 3 map. That line on the map that is on North 4 Sea Drive is the -- it ' s the landward line of 5 the most protected feature. It depends on 6 what the natural protective feature is . If 7 it ' s a bluff for example, it' s 25 feet 8 landward from the crest to the beach, I can' t 9 even explain that. I don' t even have enough 10 time for that. It' s a physiographic 100 foot 11 back before you get to vegetation. In the 12 existence of a dune and multiple beach ridges 13 here. If you go back to the record of 14 Bombara again, I think what they were trying 15 to do is come up with, you know, at some 16 point, it morphs into (inaudible) . You have 17 sand that moves around. That is why I talked 18 before about mature vegetation for example. 19 That is very stable. That hasn' t moved a lot 20 in decades, if not centuries. So I think the 21 effort here on Bombara is to come up with a 22 landward limit on the natural protective 23 feature, in this case, being a beach ridge or 24 dune. Not a bluff because we don' t have one . 25 Not a beach because we have a dune. And that 38 1 is what happened in that case. So sea-ha, 2 Coastal Erosion has an area sort of programed 3 and it speaks specifically to the natural 4 protective feature that first has to be 5 identified. And then from there, you 6 determine where that limit is . 7 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : So then 8 would it be safe to assume, at least, with 9 this parcel itself, the natural protective 10 feature area and the Coastal Erosion Hazard 11 area are one of the same? 12 MR. DOUG ADAMS : No . 13 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : Okay. 14 MR. DOUG ADAMS : I think the 15 natural protective feature is the ridge. The 16 feature is what protects -- if you read 17 through the sea-ha language, it talks about 18 what is protecting the coastline. So if you 19 have -- if you have a dune or if you have a 20 bluff, basically behind the beach, that is 21 designated as the natural protective feature 22 or structure let ' s say. 23 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Greg, 24 the Coastal Erosion Line was developed by the 25 State and we struggled with it when we were 39 1 Trustees. There wasn' t a solid reason why 2 the line was where it was . 3 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : And I 4 guess my bigger concern here is determining 5 what the natural protective feature area is . 6 And I guess just going back to this line of 7 questioning -- and I -- maybe I am trying to 8 over simplify a complex point, it would be 9 your contention that the natural protective 10 feature area runs to the ridge only seaward 11 or does it run landward at all? 12 MR. DOUG ADAMS : No . That is what 13 we ' re trying to determine here. What the 14 land would limit. The natural protective 15 feature that defines the -- the natural 16 protected area. Everything would be seaward 17 of this lune. If you were to determine what 18 an area -- you are talking about sea-ha. I 19 think that is more of a broad thing. I don' t 20 know that it is necessarily used -- a Coastal 21 Erosion Hazard area. That is just talking 22 about the area of the shoreline. I think the 23 natural protective feature, if you look at 24 the sea-ha maps, I believe when they labeled 25 that black line that is the only line on the 40 1 map, I believe it ' s labeled landward limit of 2 natural protective feature. So that would be 3 the limiting -- the line that is -- you know, 4 everything you want to do landward of that. 5 You don' t want to do anything seaward of that 6 line. 7 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : All 8 right. That is fine. It seems like there is 9 two different things here and I am just 10 trying to clarify -- 11 MR. DOUG ADAMS : I think sea-ha is 12 more the title of the program. And I think 13 the important -- you know, the meat and 14 potatoes thing is whatever that land would 15 limit -- whatever feature we' re talking about 16 is . And that is what we have tried to define 17 here. 18 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: I have 19 a question pertaining to that line. Pat 20 mentioned that she would like to establish 21 that. And then just quickly reading what we 22 just got from the denial from the Trustees, 23 it seems like there is -- difference of 24 opinion of where you think that primary dune 25 line is or that natural protective feature 41 1 line is, between you and the Trustees? Am I 2 sensing that right? Do you both agree on 3 that line? 4 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Well, it was 5 never -- that decision was just -- I want to 6 say to regurgitation of the code. We never 7 ever discussed it or debated it . 8 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Because 9 that is one of there -- 10 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: They don' t 11 handle Coastal Erosion Hazard appeals. The 12 wetland line and the definition -- if that 13 were the case -- again, the (inaudible) was 14 developed within the last 10 years . And they 15 came to the conclusion -- they had to 16 establish some line. If you' re going to say 17 the entire property is a natural protective 18 feature and you can' t -- 19 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: I 20 understand that part. I am just -- reading 21 one of these Whereas ' from the Trustees of 22 their denial, they' re kind of implying that 23 part of the proposed structure goes seaward 24 of that line. So that is why I am asking -- 25 you' re showing it ' s not but they' re saying it 42 1 is . So it sounds like the trustees don' t 2 agree with what you say the line is . 3 MR. DOUG ADAMS : I don' t think they 4 entertaining where we ' re actually showing 5 that line or what it even meant. They were 6 just "Whereas-ing" based on the sea-ha map 7 line, which we know is the seaward side of 8 North Sea Drive. 9 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: -- the original 10 project description had the house really 11 centered on the property, right into -- 12 certainly inside -- well inside that red 13 line. 14 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: It says 15 here, "Whereas, some of the proposed 16 structure as applied for is located within a 17 primary dune area with the proposed deck and 18 proposed pool, encroaching seaward of the 19 proposed dwelling. " 20 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: We disagree 21 with that conclusion. There was a lot of 22 confusion. The last meeting when they were 23 looking at the survey, there was a lot of 24 lines . And I think that -- that -- certainly 25 at the hearing, they were questioning, "Where 43 1 is the pier line?" And I think Doug had to 2 go up to the computer and say or the dais and 3 say, here it is . So I don' t know if they had 4 pre-written that before the hearing. So they 5 could clarify some of those points they made 6 in the resolution. The resolution was 7 adopted pretty much at the hearing and we 8 were still in the process of going through 9 the hearing. And again, that issue was never 10 addressed. They didn' t say we disagree. We 11 think we ' re within the line. And we would at 12 that point said, well, what are you looking 13 at? And there was never a discussion at all . 14 I was -- Kelly and I were the last. 15 MS . KELLY RISOTTO: At the last 16 Trustees meeting, which was certainly the 17 first one I was at. Really the focus of the 18 line discussion was on the line of 19 development. The "pier line" that they were 20 looking at between the two adjacent 21 properties. So this dune line, landward, was 22 not ever discussed. That was the line that 23 they were focusing on. 24 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: Can I 25 just ask, is this the development line? Are 44 1 they using it interchangeably? I am -- the 2 reason I ask, because I am unaware of a 3 development line in the code, particularly 4 one that meanders one like this . 5 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Interesting, 6 during Bombara, there was never discussion of 7 pier line. During the (inaudible) 8 application, never discussion about pier 9 line. In really any of the reviews that I 10 had through of the Trustees, that was never 11 -- that pier line, if you look at Page 75, 12 pier line is a defined term and it takes -- 13 dots . And what they tried to do -- just 14 policy wise, it was just incorporated into 15 the code. When you are putting in 16 applications for a dock, you put in a pier 17 line. Sometimes -- and it ' s -- it allows for 18 some discretion because obviously if you' re 19 in a curve, you have circumstances, you can 20 create those hardship for people. If you 21 got, you know, curve and you are here and 22 wherever. They have been trying to stick to 23 that definition almost on the housing 24 setback. And it ' s so misapplied. 25 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: What is 45 1 development line? 2 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Development 3 line? Are you asking -- 4 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: You are 5 the one that put it on the map. Where did 6 that term come from? It ' s not a line -- 7 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: What we did 8 is, through Bombara, they came up with the 9 development line. So some kind of a 10 short-cut, but in Bombara, based on the site 11 condition, all of the factors, they came up 12 with the Bombara line, okay. 13 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: In 14 other words, it ' s the primary dune line? 15 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: It' s the co of 16 the primary dune line . 17 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Yes . 18 Yes . 19 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: That is why I 20 had to read it. It ' s just a defined term 21 that the experts use . 22 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: This is 23 a pretty novel argument, essentially really 24 what you' re calling it, a yard. I -- 25 undeveloped like most yards . So I am trying 46 1 to figure out what -- what is going to 2 distinguish that from someone else' s yard? 3 In other words, is there going to be a 4 covenant that requires no development of any 5 -- of each level of structures? Decking? Is 6 there going to be boat storage? Is there 7 going to be any of those things? What makes 8 it preservation? 9 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Well, when you 10 issue a Coastal Erosion permit, you can 11 condition it on -- the application that you 12 approve is the one that we submit. The 13 Trustees application when you submit it, they 14 require a non-disturbance buffers. So if you 15 see the -- the planting plan, that is 16 described as a non-disturbance buffer. That 17 is a covenant that the Trustees required to 18 be filed prior to the issuance of the actual 19 permit. So -- I take it back. They issue 20 the permit before the Compliance Certificate 21 is issued. So pretty much on 900 of the 22 wetland permit applications are submitted if 23 they require a 5 foot vegetated buffer, a 10 24 foot non-disturbance or whatever. They -- 25 that is a condition of the covenants and 47 1 restrictions. So this owner and future 2 owners will have knowledge that that area is 3 to be left in its pristine state. And I 4 think it probably -- I believe there is a 5 covenant on the Bombara property as well . 6 The area -- the dune area. That area is left 7 in its natural state. 8 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: You' re 9 talking about a non-disturbance buffer? 10 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: I spoke -- no . 11 No . That was my brain -- you know, it ' s an 12 open and undeveloped natural area. 13 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: The IA 14 system, you have done analysis going back 15 what? 30, 40, almost 50 years? Or more than 16 that? Have you done any type of breach 17 analysis? In other words how many times has 18 that area flooded as a result to Sandy? As a 19 result of Irene? One of those Nor'Easter' s? 20 On top of that, what is the plane of an IA 21 system if there is an electrical failure and 22 should there -- that area be flooded? In 23 other words, there hasn' t been a good success 24 rate of IA systems once that barrier -- once 25 an area floods and the electrical system goes 48 1 out, and the IA systems are no longer able to 2 function. What' s the protective measure in 3 place for that? 4 MR. DOUG ADAMS : So if an IA system 5 typically gets over-flooded and there is an 6 electrical problem or just loss of power in 7 general, at least this system -- there are a 8 lot of systems out there that are approved by 9 Suffolk County Health Department. This, I 10 believe is a Fuji System and if there is no 11 power, it basically functions as a regular 12 septic tank. And also, the IA systems are 13 required to have a maintenance contract. I 14 would assume after a storm, they are back in 15 town, just like an electrician or anything 16 else to get the system going once again. 17 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: I am not 18 talking about that. I am talking about what 19 is the consequences of a flooding and a 20 non-functioning IA system? In other words, 21 when you' re flooding, the water table 22 underneath comes up and not just another 23 surface waters . What is the impact -- 24 MR. DOUG ADAMS : It ' s actually the 25 exact same as the leaching pools that are 49 1 still here. The only difference is that you 2 don' t have a septic tank. 3 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: I think 4 we just need to point that out . I have seen 5 that in other areas . That water table rises 6 and we ' re pushing a lot of stuff into that 7 coastline. 8 MR. DOUG ADAMS : I think it ' s 9 important to remember that, as far as 10 leaching is concerned and rate through the 11 soil, the rate through the soil, whether 12 there is introduction of groundwater or not, 13 is the same. So when a leaching pool is 14 filled, it ' s emptying right? It ' s going 15 through the soil . If it hits groundwater, 16 it ' s still going through the soil . It goes 17 at the same rate. It would be very short 18 term. 19 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: Which 20 again raises the issue, how close is the 21 leaching pool to the water table and the 22 water table elevates during a storm which is 23 not uncommon. And you' re going to have 24 septic intrusion. 25 MR. DOUG ADAMS : I think the only 50 1 way septic escapes a system is other than the 2 normal way, which is out -- it still moves at 3 the same rate. As long as it ' s in the 4 ground, it ' s moving through the soil at the 5 same rate. Also in recent years, Suffolk 6 County has raised the separation distance and 7 the minimum of feet. The separation from the 8 system has to be a minimum of 3 feet, which 9 is where we are at here. 10 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: I have 11 a couple of questions on the deck. The pool 12 I assume is going to be on pilings as well? 13 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Yes . Do you 14 need actual pool construction description? 15 We have the architect. 16 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: I 17 understand what it' s like when it' s on 18 pilings and the others may have questions. 19 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Yes . It ' s 20 going to be elevated. The design, so that 21 you do have a massing of all -- from one end, 22 the depth, the house and so on. There was 23 openings -- 24 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: To the 25 current FEMA standards? 51 1 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Yes . 2 Everything has to be clearly to the FEMA 3 standards. 4 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: I am 5 looking at the color map here because it ' s 6 the biggest one that we have in front of us . 7 Where is the backfill for the pool? The 8 overflow? 9 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Drywell? 10 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: 11 Drywell, yes . 12 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Let' s see, 13 just -- let me show it. It ' s easier than 14 describing it. 15 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: That 16 says propane tank. Yeah, you' re right. 17 COUNCILWOMAN SARAH NAPPA: I have a 18 question also on the west side of the house. 19 I can' t quite read the survey that I have. 20 What is that square inside of the square on 21 the west side of the house? 22 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: The way this 23 house was designed, that is actually a master 24 bedroom suite. Almost a two-dimensional -- 25 Ed, you want to come up and describe? Leet 52 1 me have the architect describe it. I think 2 he can do better. 3 COUNCILWOMAN SARAH NAPPA: Sure. 4 MR. ED LICALZI : Hopefully I can 5 answer your question. The square within a 6 square as you' re calling it, you have to look 7 at it, the shaded square is really ground 8 level . It ' s about a 10 foot high point to 9 where the second floor is over it. So 10 basically you' re seeing around that core 11 structure. It' s giving a view from the 12 streamline, straight through from the beach. 13 It ' s not this whole solid mass from left to 14 right. So it ' s an elevated portion floor, 15 higher than the ground floor. 16 COUNCILWOMAN SARAH NAPPA: Is it 17 part of the deck, outer square and the inner 18 square is the structure? 19 MR. ED LICALZI : It ' s two-fold. 20 It ' s part of the master bedroom that is 21 there, as well as, an outside deck. So it' s 22 a combination of those two spaces . 23 COUNCILWOMAN SARAH NAPPA: Is it 24 attached to the structure? 25 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Because 53 1 it looks like it ' s separate. 2 MR. ED LICALZI : I am sorry, could 3 you repeat the question? 4 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Yes . 5 Is it attached -- 6 MR. ED LICALZI : Yes, it ' s 7 attached. 8 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Doesn' t 9 look like it. It looks like it is detached 10 with a -- 11 COUNCILWOMAN SARAH NAPPA: That ' s 12 what it looks like. 13 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: I asked the 14 same question. So yes . 15 MR. ED LICALZI : (Inaudible) . 16 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Which 17 is bigger than the first floor. 18 MR. ED LICALZI : (Inaudible) partial 19 outside deck. 20 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: So the 21 second floor is bigger than the first floor 22 in that section. It ' s twice the size of it 23 or more . 24 MR. DENIS NONCARROW: Can we have 25 your name for the record, sir? 54 1 MR. ED LICALZI : The entire 2 building envelope, yes . 3 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: So the entire 4 building envelope is a dash line that 5 continues around that shaded rectangle. So 6 if you see -- there is an elevation of 10 . 5 . 7 That is kind of the west side of the house. 8 And then you clearly see the shaded proposed 9 -- the building envelope. It ' s kind of like 10 layers . So it does extend to the -- to the 11 west side, and the decking is part of that. 12 So the deck doesn' t extend out the water. 13 It ' s part of that dashed line. Does that 14 make sense? 15 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: No . 16 What dash line? Yeah. Yeah. 17 MR. ED LICALZI : This is the piles . 18 Up to the elevation. This elevation here 19 also starts on piles . 20 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: And 21 that is the first floor? 22 MR. ED LICALZI : This is the first 23 floor. This for a lack of a better term, 24 second floor. This here is what she means by 25 the dash line -- 55 1 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Oh, 2 that is what she meant. Got it . Okay. 3 MR. ED LICALZI : This is a modern 4 design. The idea was to allow -- to view 5 straight through the house. 6 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: Is that 7 2500 square feet of the first floor lot area? 8 MR. ED LICALZI : Yes . 9 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: What 10 would be the total living space? 11 MR. ED LICALZI : 5600 . 12 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: The 13 elevation to the ridge line? 14 MR. ED LICALZI : We are just under. 15 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: He is showing 16 the model . He has a picture of it . 17 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: What is 18 the finished elevation? 19 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Finished 20 elevation is 18 . So -- 21 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: 35 feet. 22 You are going to get two floors over that 23 in -- 24 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: He was able to 25 design. 56 1 MR. ED LICALZI : Based on the 2 topography as well, yes . 3 COUNCILMAN BRIAN MEALY: Can you 4 just restate your name at the podium, sir? 5 MR. ED LICALZI : Ed Licalzi, Sitar 6 (phonetic) Engineering. 7 COUNCILMAN BRIAN MEALY: Thank you. 8 COUNCILWOMAN SARAH NAPPA: And I 9 just want to clarify. I think I heard it -- 10 but it ' s a flat roof house? 11 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Yes . 12 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: This 13 isn' t a question but just an observation that 14 I have here, one of the problems with FEMA, 15 people are building in areas that they 16 shouldn' t build. And that is the problem. 17 There is wetlands construction. And one of 18 the problems -- what is the Town Board' s role 19 is we ' re not going to mitigate those hazards . 20 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: You can' t 21 adopt the law on laws that are already 22 existing. I mean, every time you adopt a 23 Zoning Code, I am here complaining -- 24 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: It 25 doesn' t necessarily relief. Sometimes lots 57 1 are simply not buildable. And some times you 2 can' t keep perpetuating decisions from the 3 past. I am not suggesting that is my 4 position here. I am just saying let ' s be 5 realistic on the discussion. FEMA really 6 does not require the approval of the building 7 permit. 8 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: We will agree 9 to disagree. 10 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : If I may, 11 I was wondering if we could go back to these 12 lines again and maybe, you know -- 13 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: These lines, 14 the development lines? 15 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : Where the 16 dune is -- you know -- 17 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: I will send 18 the people up. 19 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : It was 20 your contention that the Trustees were 21 unclear on where they wanted the line to be? 22 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Sorry. One 23 moment. I am sorry, I couldn' t hear you. 24 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : So we 25 were talking about where, you know, where the 58 1 dune line is? The landward limit? The 2 seaward ho and all of that . One of you had 3 made a comment that it was unclear where the 4 Trustees felt the line was . And just going 5 through the record, I see part of the -- one 6 of the documents that they cited was the LWRP 7 finding. And I was wondering if you can just 8 comment on this last line here? This is 9 talking about a site visit that was conducted 10 by the Board of Trustees, the LWRP 11 Coordinator, the DEC Environmental Program 12 Specialist, where they confirmed that the 13 proposed actions --and this application are 14 entirely located seaward of the sea-ha line 15 and within the primary dune. So it seems 16 like it ' s their contention that the primary 17 dune and the sea-ha area are one in the same. 18 MR. DOUG ADAMS : Again, what I 19 think they were referring to is the sea-ha 20 map that is on record right now, which shows 21 the sea-ha line. Which on that map is 22 labeled with a limit of coastal protective 23 feature area or natural protective feature, 24 sorry, is on North Sea Drive. They were just 25 referring to that map and didn' t possibly 59 1 consider -- I don' t recall talking about it . 2 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: And 3 those areas might overlap Greg. 4 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : No. Not 5 that they may overlap. 6 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: They 7 do . 8 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Let me correct 9 something. They actually cited on 10 October 17, 2007, which was the Bombara 11 application and it was at that meeting, that 12 the LWRP and DEC coastal reservice person and 13 the Trustees, they were at that property. 14 They never came to this property or even 15 reviewed it . So the 2007 -- 16 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : That is 17 untrue though. Because in this letter, they 18 are saying that they' re reviewing it. 19 They' re referencing that site visit, yes . 20 But the LWRP Coordinator who quite frankly 21 could be helpful to maybe hear from regarding 22 this matter, is saying and confirming that 23 this proposed action -- the proposed action, 24 "the proposed actions are entirely located 25 seaward of the sea-ha line and within the 60 1 primary dune. " This is important here. This 2 determination still applies. 3 MR. DOUG ADAMS : Clearly that is 4 their opinion. 5 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : Okay. 6 Thank you. 7 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: And I would 8 just -- in the Bombara case, that was the 9 conclusion that they drew at all these 10 properties on North Sea Drive, every single 11 one that is developed is in the Dune area. 12 Because the dune area overlaps -- according 13 to the Bombara inspection, every property is 14 the same here. The dune lines run to the 15 street and actually across --technically 16 looking at it, goes across on the south side 17 of the North Sea Drive. 18 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Which 19 was designated an intertidal dunal swale. 20 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: No Coastal 21 Erosion or wetland ordinance review. The 22 houses that are on that side -- 23 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: No . 24 They have wetland review. 25 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Maybe more 61 1 recently. 2 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: No . 3 When I was on the Board, we did the wetland 4 review. 5 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: I didn' t see 6 -- okay. 7 MR. ED LICALZI : (Inaudible) (Not 8 near the microphone. ) 9 COUNCILWOMAN SARAH NAPPA: Sorry, 10 could you talk into the mic. 11 MR. ED LICALZI : It is helpful to 12 have something to reference to . I will try 13 and do without it. The meeting with the 14 Trustees basically on site, answered to, how 15 to basically design or utilize any type of 16 zoning to design the new home, was to take an 17 imaginary line from the back of each one of 18 these two residences, which they refer to as 19 a pier line. And we would stay landward of 20 that line. What came about in the 21 development of meetings thereafter was that 22 when we established a pier line from the 23 furthest most point of the home on both 24 sides, east and west. They disagreed with 25 the line, stating that, living space of the 62 1 homes . So what we had done is establish the 2 living space. This corner here to this very 3 corner here. And also realized that we would 4 have to create another pier line to cover the 5 limits of the deck that re going to be 6 protruding out, which makes some sense. And 7 we only offered that to a solution to the 8 fact if we hold to the living space and only 9 the living space, even though the parcels, 10 the adjacent parcels had decks past that 11 point, it made sense to establish that second 12 line. And I think at that point is where we 13 kind of lost it, if you don' t mind me saying, 14 with the members and there was slightly a 15 disagreement. I think the point here today 16 is the establishment if this line and where 17 does it come from, and that three dimensional 18 dune, which your question makes perfect sense 19 to me . I think what happened here, is that 20 Doug from Young & Young has gone out in the 21 field. Taken the Bombara' s toe, which was 22 approved in a prior application. And 23 literally went out in the field and 24 established the same grade elevations there. 25 Across the lot. Establish this limit line of 63 1 construction. Essentially it ' s the toe of 2 the dune. If you are at the toe, you are 3 going to slightly rise to the height of the 4 dune and then it would taper back towards the 5 sound. And I think that is what we ' re 6 talking about here. So without this 7 establishment of this line, this limit of 8 construction line, we have no where to go. 9 No where to go other than keep providing 10 different design drawings that mean 11 absolutely nothing because we were guided by 12 Town Code, which is an R-40 Zone. And that 13 is essentially out the window here. So the 14 only thing that we' re utilizing from that 15 R-40 zone is a side yard setbacks. Front 16 yard we ' re being controlled by an average 17 front yard between two adjacent properties. 18 Which makes sense. We are in the code to be 19 50 feet back. We ' re agreeing that we would 20 move the house forward and be within that 21 average, which causes a variance which we 22 understand. Also, we ' re expecting this limit 23 line that was also respected by the prior 24 application. So in a sense we ' re trying to 25 help ourselves to generate this limit line 64 1 because we have no other guidance to go by. 2 So that is where our issue lies . 3 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: And I 4 agree with everything you' re saying. My 5 question is, the limit line that you talk 6 about, you think it ' s one way and I think the 7 Trustees think it ' s another. So I think this 8 Board needs to establish if -- we need to 9 have everybody on the same page of where that 10 limit line is . 11 MR. ED LICALZI : I agree with 12 everything that you just said. Perfect. I 13 think where the issue is, the only 14 establishment where we were getting from the 15 Board of Trustees was to use a pier line. We 16 created the limit line. At the same time, we 17 created the pier lines, as they had asked us 18 from a work session. Basically that 19 information was fed back to us . We ended up 20 producing another updated design drawing. We 21 then resubmitted and came back before the 22 Board. And at that point, that has never 23 been resolved. That is the issue. To be 24 clear, if the trustees were to say that we 25 have to respect two pier lines, 65 1 hypothetically speaking, versus an 2 established limit of construction line, then 3 we would do that. We ' re just not getting 4 there. That is the problem. 5 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Yeah. 6 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: One of 7 the things that I would say is not for us to 8 coordinate with the Trustees and get on the 9 same page. We' re an appellate. It ' s for a 10 variance. So what do they mean? And for us 11 to evaluate whether what they said or not has 12 validity and merit as part of this hearing. 13 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: 14 Correct. 15 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: So we ' re all 16 asking the same questions internally. The 17 Bombara development line was established 18 before this Board, in front of this Board. 19 Not the Trustees . The Trustees at that point 20 had denied the application in total and after 21 this Board granted the Coastal Erosion 22 permit, they went back to the Trustees and I 23 guess either through litigation or whatever, 24 they issued the Coastal Erosion permit and 25 they issued the wetland permit. So it is in 66 1 front of this Board. Internally, your 2 prerogative to ask for whatever comments the 3 Trustees -- that you ask. You are in charge 4 there. But as far as we ' re concerned, we 5 have done -- we have taken the process as 6 your prior precedent for us, have directed us 7 what we should come up with and the facts 8 that we should come up. As I said, we need 9 to be in agreement as to those facts because 10 certainly when you' re asking about setbacks 11 and give us your lot coverage, we have to 12 start somewhere. And it ' s that development 13 line that is key. The more restrictive that 14 is brought towards the street, the more 15 likely you have to go to the Zoning Board for 16 variances and we gave you that aerial to show 17 you how that development of North Sea Drive, 18 what that looks like. We would like to be 19 similar of the character of the community 20 that is well established. And to the extent 21 of Bombara, I think they got a variance for a 22 setback of -- is it 40 . Okay. 39 . 9 is the 23 Bombara front yard. Anyway. We will answer 24 any more questions. Kelly? 25 MS . KELLY RISOTTO: I just want to 67 1 say that the lines are behind all the 2 development that we ' re talking about. 3 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: I 4 understand that. I would like to ask the 5 Trustees if they agree with your line or do 6 they have a different area of the line? Just 7 reading their denial, it sounds like their 8 area where they think the line is, is 9 different than what is on there. So I just 10 need to clarify that with the Trustees. 11 MR. ED LICALZI : And again, I 12 believe they hung that hat on that map -- the 13 current map. Not our map. The sea-ha map 14 which shows the line -- 15 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: I 16 understand that. I am talking -- the Coastal 17 Erosion they did. They also mentioned a 18 Whereas, about the primary dune line. The 19 limit line. 20 MR. ED LICALZI : They said primary 21 dune. Not primary dune line. I think they 22 are just throwing -- because when that map 23 was developed -- 24 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Primary 25 dune area. Okay. I just -- 68 1 MR. ED LICALZI : -- the beach ridges 2 go back across North Sea Drive. 3 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: I 4 understand. 5 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : Were 6 there any discussions with the BOT about the 7 size of the house or scaling it back at all? 8 I guess -- I don' t know how relevant that is 9 but just as general context? 10 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: No. Not in 11 reviewing the transcripts. No . They had an 12 issue -- there was again our communications 13 was through Elizabeth Cantell and e-mail . It 14 was a one liner. Like, we want you to do 15 this . We want you to do that. Whatever the 16 work session discussions were, where they 17 were having their discussions, they came back 18 with their one liners . And we followed 19 whatever they were instructing us to do . The 20 pool originally was in the waterfront. Then 21 it was moved to the side. It is behind the 22 accessory structure pier line. Okay. They 23 may have wanted it to be moved back. I was 24 just trying to guess at that point. At our 25 last hearing, everybody get testy on the 69 1 Board and I was like, please, don' t make the 2 decision. Give us time to go back. So we 3 can understand what your points are . I got 4 cut off and they denied it . So I think there 5 was some discussion but they just completely 6 cut it off. And at that point -- 7 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: I hope 8 you appreciate that we ' re not testy. We ' re 9 inquisitive. 10 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: My husband has 11 told me sometimes when things are going on 12 behind the scenes. 13 MS . KELLY RISOTTO: I just wanted 14 to -- there has been talk about this line 15 quite a bit . From the Bombara decision, they 16 talked about the line being adopted by the 17 Town Board. The beach-ridge identified by 18 the applicant' s experts qualifies as a 19 primary dune under Chapter 111-6. And as 20 such, constitutes the natural protective 21 feature. The landward regulatory limit of 22 the primary dune occurs 25 feet landward of 23 the landward toe of the dune. Identified on 24 the property. So the Town Board took that 25 methodology, took that line and there is 70 1 still a landward regulatory limit beyond what 2 that feature is . And that is also what the 3 sea-ha establishes as well . It ' s landward of 4 that. We just need to figure out what line 5 we ' re going to use. The other thing I wanted 6 to point out, the other thing in the Trustees 7 decision, they basically quoted the 8 regulations and didn' t really offer any site 9 specific information or reasoning for the 10 denial . They quoted as you were mentioning 11 before, the 2007 site visit on the adjacent 12 property. You know, they' re quoting adverse 13 effect on fin fish and shell fish. I don' t 14 understand how that is possible when we ' re 15 213 feet from knee high water and a 100 foot 16 dune in between that. So I just wanted to -- 17 let ' s take it into context a little bit and 18 understand that is what the denial says . 19 They didn' t say that this project will 20 adversely because of this . It was just a 21 quote of the regulations. 22 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: I got to 23 be honest. I don' t think we should be 24 talking much about Trustee decision making. 25 That is out of our scope. We have some 71 1 pretty narrow focus here and that is Coastal 2 Erosion as mitigation and how do we mitigate 3 that. And one thing I do want to say is, 4 there has been a lot of discussion about the 5 lessons of Bombara. One thing I do think we 6 have to consider and certainly, I have to 7 consider, is the lessons of Sandy as well . 8 So I want everybody to understand where I am 9 coming from. That has a great deal with 10 Coastal Erosion and mitigation. 11 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: I know you 12 know from being a supervisor during Sandy, 13 we ' re impacted the most. I can only tell you 14 from one of my clients. We have one here for 15 a hearing not that long ago for a very small 16 creation to his covered porch. A no brainer. 17 But as far as my conversations with him and 18 he has been there since before the 90s . He 19 has been there a long time . He was not 20 impacted at all by Sandy and I don' t know 21 that North Sea Drive homes were impacted by 22 Sandy. Whether there was flooding by the 23 road, that may be possible because of the 24 beach. Water going to the low spots wherever 25 water will go. So but the homes themselves 72 1 were pretty stable and they were -- this area 2 is one of the better areas . 3 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: I am the 4 Emergency Management Coordinator. So most of 5 the flooding in that instance came from the 6 bay. Most of the flooding from Irene came 7 from the Nor' easter to the sound. Irene 8 wasn' t classified as a hurricane but had all 9 the characteristics of a hurricane. And that 10 as you' re aware took out large sections of 11 the road along the northerly shore of 12 Southold Town. 13 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: I think 14 Scott -- 15 MS . KELLY RISOTTO: NOAA had flown 16 images of the entire Long Island coast after 17 Hurricane Sandy that I can certainly provide 18 to the Board showing the conditions, if you 19 would like? 20 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: I think 21 to Scott ' s point, we never know what Mother 22 Nature is going to do . You know, we didn' t 23 -- the worst places that Sandy hit, we could 24 have said in this room and said, it has been 25 that way for years and Sandy hit it . I think 73 1 to Scott ' s point, you don' t know what 2 direction it ' s going to come from or hit . So 3 we have to take that under consideration -- 4 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Understood. 5 The clients also want to build something that 6 is to storm, flooding. That is why you build 7 with as many flood protections as -- that are 8 scientifically available. So thank you. I 9 am giving you this map that has the red line. 10 I have three of them. Only one with color? 11 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: One is 12 fine with the color. 13 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: I am 14 going to at this point ask if anyone would 15 like to address the Town Board on this 16 particular Public Hearing? This gentleman 17 had his hand up first. I am going to go to 18 you first and then I will go to you right 19 after. 20 MR. ED THIRLBY: Hi . My name is Ed 21 Thirlby. I live on Soundview Avenue, 11185 22 Soundview Avenue, which is between Horton and 23 Kenny' s . I am probably -- 200-300 yards from 24 this proposed structure. I have been living 25 there for almost 40 years, and over that time 74 1 I have seen profound changes in the 2 environment. The wildlife, the wetlands . 3 You know, the plants, the animals. And I 4 just want to say that having seen a lot of 5 development there, any development that takes 6 place affects not just the neighboring lots 7 but the entire area. There is a ripple 8 affect. So you have to approach things very 9 carefully and understand sort of what the -- 10 the macro picture is on this . And this area 11 -- and I would just like to say as a side, 12 the dune does not end at North Sea Drive. 13 The dune extends for hundreds of feet on the 14 south side of North Sea Drive. That area 15 should be protected as well . And it ' s not 16 being currently protected. The point I am 17 trying to make here, the general point I am 18 trying to make, when we are talking about 19 building structures and mitigation and 20 natural plantings and stuff like that, this 21 is not just environmental theory. Real 22 changes happen in the neighborhood when there 23 is construction. Needs to be approached very 24 carefully. We elected our trustees to look 25 after that process. And to look carefully 75 1 and to work hard and they do work hard. And 2 understand and make sure that these beautiful 3 natural areas are protected and they are here 4 for our kids and grand kids . So I am here to 5 support the Trustees and let you know that I 6 am supporting the trustees . I am here to 7 support you in supporting our Trustees. That 8 is my message. 9 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : Thank 10 you. 11 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: 12 Gentleman in the back. I just need to remind 13 people to mention your name and the hamlet. 14 MR. MICHAEL VERNEY: Michael 15 Verney, 2125 North Sea Drive. I am two hours 16 away from the proposed building site. I just 17 want to straighten out a couple of things. I 18 have only owned my house for 30 years . I 19 have only been a primary resident there for 20 4 . But I have been coming to this area and 21 that particular area, McCabe' S Beach, I 22 remember learning how to swim there when I 23 was 6 . Superstorm Sandy was a South Shore 24 event. You know what, they have zero 25 protection. I almost bought that house in 76 1 the corner. Thank Jesus I didn' t . But we 2 got nothing. Meanwhile when I was in Nassau 3 County, I had gotten 9 feet of saltwater in 4 my store in Freeport, Long Island. So it was 5 a life changing event. I will give you that. 6 That was unbelievable. Not a hurricane but a 7 Superstorm. But any way, there was nothing 8 there. I was in that house before I owned 9 it . I was very close friends with the 10 previous owner. I purchased it from my 11 friend Lee, who was the guitar player for 12 Cindy Lauper. And I am trying to get to the 13 point, I am sorry. The perfect storm, the 14 perfect storm, water came -- the waves were 15 breaking just behind the deck and the water 16 was the foam that was coming in and hitting 17 the house. We were scared. We were there. 18 It was -- we were there. We had cellphones 19 but there was no cellphone service out here. 20 Anyway. That was the last thing I remember. 21 I think Donna was the last time there was 22 substantial erosion. Two of the houses, 23 including the one next to the lot being 24 built, ended up in the woods across the 25 street. And that is when they brought 77 1 everything back. They were just wood on the 2 ground. I don' t think they were attached to 3 pilings . They brought everything back and 4 started to raise everything. Other than 5 that, the dune. The dune changes. The whole 6 environment is a living and breathing thing. 7 Nor' easter' s seems to affect this more. The 8 dune used to be 15 feet further out as far as 9 the peak. Going out and dropping down. It 10 down have a drop down. We lost most of that 11 in the Nor' easter in 2012 . It ' s coming back. 12 The vegetation is coming back. The height is 13 coming back. The distance as they say, this 14 is as long as it has ever been to the water. 15 Other than that, I just wanted to clarify 16 that. I am a simple man. So you guys talk 17 about pier line and shore lines and this line 18 and that line. The only line that I am 19 concerned about and I don' t see that this is 20 going to affect it, and I don' t want to speak 21 for my neighbors, but concerned about that I 22 come out onto my back and I can see Kenny' s 23 Beach. And I can see McCabe' s Beach. And I 24 can literally see the back of every one of my 25 neighbors houses and I can wave . Just don' t 78 1 want to have that blocked. That is the line 2 -- it ' s not -- someone has to come up with a 3 decision as to what the line is . I can tell 4 you what my idea of the line is . I want to 5 be able to see my new neighbors . I want to 6 be able to see my neighbors past them. I 7 want to be able to see my neighbors to the 8 right. Again, this is a big house. I love 9 big houses . I wish I could afford one. 10 Nonetheless, this line is starting to freak 11 me out . There is so many lines drawn on this 12 map and I went to college believe it or not 13 in the way that I talk, but I went to 14 college. Nonetheless, like they said, the 15 line that I am concerned about and the rest 16 of my neighbors. You have to establish that 17 so that these people can figure out what they 18 have to do . And that is all I have to say. 19 Thank you. 20 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: Thank 21 you. Please? 22 MR. JOE BURRASCANO: Good 23 afternoon. I am Joe Burrascano. I am at 24 2120 North Sea Drive. My year-round house. 25 So much I think in your decision is on this 79 1 so-called line. And I want to bring your 2 attention to the original survey that was 3 submitted, the building permit survey dated 4 November 20th of ' 22, as well as the 5 (inaudible) that has vegetation. It ' s 6 probably easier to see the colored one. Do 7 you have a copy in front of you? 8 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: Yes . 9 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Yes . 10 MR. JOE BURRASCANO: You will see 11 from the left of the page, which is the 12 Bombara house, there is a faint dotted line 13 that goes across . Across the new property. 14 All the way across to the Mastro house. If 15 you were to look at the actual survey which 16 is more clear, that dotted line continues to 17 the Mastro' s house to their addition, which 18 was done in 1980 ' s . When that addition was 19 done, it had to be pulled back from the 20 original site of the house because it was 21 encroaching too far into the water line. So 22 back then, 30 more years ago, 40 years ago, 23 they already had to be pulled back to where 24 Bombara' s line is also. And it would not be 25 far to them to have a smaller than usual 80 1 house to have a new house -- what they had to 2 do 40 years ago. If you look at that line 3 also is the demarkation between the Federal 4 Flood Zone V versus the Flood Zone A. It is 5 on the road side of the property. FEMA 6 states that these owners, 100 year storm, and 7 we have had several 100 year storms in the 8 last decade, where damage may occur where 9 debris will be strewn across other peoples 10 property and possibly causing damage. So if 11 you look at the Town Code and I wrote this in 12 my letter, it says you cannot put a 13 construction which might cause trouble that 14 might cause damage to others property. In 15 all respects, the site plan -- I love the 16 fact that we ' re going to have new neighbors. 17 Nothing personal . That' s fine. But it 18 should be respectful of, one, most up to date 19 flood zone requirements. Behind the V line. 20 2, fair to the neighbors to the right and to 21 the left. And also if you go back to the 22 argument, the very first point, they have no 23 other possible place to build their house, 24 you should go back to the Bombara decision. 25 They said well, you could do that by making 81 1 the house smaller. Making it thinner. And 2 that is basically what the decision was . So 3 yes, they fulfilled even that part. While 4 this house would, I think okay, the remedy 5 would be to make it a little bit thinner and 6 behind the pier line. This line that you can 7 say, on the original survey that connects the 8 improved part of the Mastro House. That is 9 the line that you should go by. So I think 10 it is up to you all to decide whether it 11 should be a vegetated dune line or some 12 defined line by the Federal Government and 13 the two adjoining properties. One final bit 14 of information, on the map that you had seen 15 from Pat Moore, and call it this line that 16 shows the tall of the dune, it ' s in black and 17 white. That line goes way far towards the 18 water behind the Mastro house. So that line 19 didn' t apply to them. What applied to them 20 apparently was this V line that I talked 21 about. For those reasons, I think that the 22 site plan should be modified for the house to 23 be completely behind that dotted line, which 24 is demarkation between A and V and in line 25 with the construction on both sides of the 82 1 houses that were permitted. That' s all . 2 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: I am 3 going to agree. That most of the focus 4 should have been on the Coastal Erosion 5 Mitigation Line. There is an awful lot of 6 discussion, I understand all of it . I am 7 here to look at one line and that is the 8 Coastal Erosion. 9 MR. JOE BURRASCANO: Thank you 10 MS . ELIZABETH MASTRO: Good 11 afternoon. My name is Elizabeth Mastro. The 12 owner of the house next to them. The 13 proposed house. The only concern I have 14 actually is that pier line and the living 15 space. Mr. Bombara and to our new addition 16 or to existing addition. Where is that magic 17 line that of the code? I would like to know 18 that? 19 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: That is 20 a question of the Trustees . 21 MS . ELIZABETH MASTRO: Okay. So I 22 just heard before someone saying the house is 23 going to be raised 18 feet . The house is 24 built in the 30 ' s . We owned the house since 25 the 60 ' s . So the house is small . Small . And 83 1 we have this tremendous house coming up at 2 this time. And then we have the pool and 18 3 feet. So we come out to the deck -- as Mike 4 was saying, tremendous amount of structure 5 and bushes and pier line. Really, I think -- 6 we don' t mind them being there because they 7 should be there. But just be respectful to 8 all the neighbors along the coast. And the 9 front yard -- no one really front yard and 10 back yard. They almost have two front yards . 11 Front yard to the water and front yard to the 12 street. Okay. So we at one time had all 13 sand. All of a sudden grass showed up. So 14 we mower the grass because it ' s there. We 15 didn' t plant the grass . Just came. The 16 beach side is all sand. And actually berries 17 are there. So honestly, we don' t want to 18 have -- like vibes between ourselves. I 19 think the house, we should all be in line so 20 we can all enjoy the beach and the views . 21 That is the only thing that I have to say. 22 And we have a small house. We decide to 23 build the house and she said 700 or certain 24 percentage we were allowed to extend. So the 25 house was there and we just extended a 84 1 garage. And on top of the garage, we have 2 two small bedrooms. We were not allowed to 3 go towards the water or towards the back of 4 the coverage of the lot. All of a sudden, 5 everyone is building houses and they can do 6 whatever the heck that they want and they can 7 pull out bushes . Box out all the neighbors. 8 Is that fair? No. I don' t think it ' s fair. 9 I have been in front of the Board and 10 trustees and stuff like that, and they give 11 you permission and they push you back anyway. 12 I think for respect, for not wasting 13 anybody' s time, here and coming here all the 14 time, just put the house in line where 15 everyone is going to be happy. You don' t 16 have to have tremendous, you know, 17 encroachment into the water. What they said 18 -- at one time, my husband was able to throw 19 a rod from the street to the water. You talk 20 about Sandy. We didn' t get hit by Sandy. We 21 lost power for very short time. Nature is 22 all funny that way. Just be respectful for 23 each other and we can move on. That is the 24 whole thing. (Inaudible) . But thank you very 25 much. 85 1 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: Would 2 anybody else like to address the Town Board? 3 MS . IRENE VEEDY: Hi . I am Irene 4 Veedy. I live on Soundview Avenue. I also 5 own parcel of land on North Sea Drive. I 6 wanted to note Member Doroski said that you 7 received one letter. I believe that the 8 members of the Board also received e-mails 9 from other community residents? 10 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : Yes, we 11 did. And apologies, I was just referencing 12 the file folder itself. I know we have 13 received one other letter yesterday but the 14 file was printed before that. That will be 15 part of the record itself but not read into 16 the record. So thank you. 17 MS . IRENE VEEDY: This appeal for a 18 Coastal Erosion Hazard permit comes at a time 19 when the residents of Southold are more aware 20 than ever that your decision will have 21 consequences for us who live here now and for 22 all of those that will follow us . New 23 development in this sensitive area between 24 Kenny' s and McCabe' s Beach. Must be held to 25 the highest standards of Southold' s laws . 86 1 The LWRP and the applicable regulations 2 because development on this fragile site 3 will, as we all know, adversely affect 4 wildlife and groundwater. It will increase 5 the hazards of Coastal Erosion and flooding. 6 Endangering neighboring properties and sea 7 level continues to rise. And while the beach 8 and the dune system may be stable now, the 9 past is not necessarily indicative of the 10 future. As catastrophic coastal storms are 11 becoming more and more common. Getting to 12 the appeal, it is understandable -- sorry. 13 It is undeniable that the application for 14 permit failed to meet the standards for its 15 issuance and that this petition fails to meet 16 most, if not, all of the criteria for a 17 variance because this is a self-created 18 hardship. It was the applicants choice to 19 purchase this site when they knew or should 20 have known that our laws have stringent 21 restrictions on waterfront development. 22 "Ignorance of the Law is no excuse. " In 23 addition, the proposed are not mitigation. 24 They are the bear minimum required by law for 25 all new constructions in Southold. Namely 87 1 development of the beach and dune are already 2 forbidden under Chapter 111 . IA systems for 3 wastewater management are required for all 4 projects. And compliance with FEMA 5 construction standards are mandatory. Not 6 voluntary. Moreover, the areas that of beach 7 and dune to be left to be undisturbed, is 8 irrelevant. Because there is no right to 9 disturb them. The beach and the dune will 10 not act as protective features . If there is 11 building near or upon them. The petition 12 also compares this project with the Bombara 13 project. And to some extent the Betsch home 14 down the line. It is inappropriate to 15 compare this project to those. The Bombara 16 home was proposed over 15 years ago . Before 17 Superstorm Sandy and amendments of Chapter 18 111 . The proposed structures in this project 19 are located substantially I 'm the VE ' s flood 20 zone. While the Bombara is in the less 21 hazardous AE zone. The proposed development 22 is oversized and greatly exceeds what was 23 approved by the Board in Bombara. 24 Approximately twice the size. And the Betsch 25 home was a rebuild of a preexisting home more 88 1 than 20 years ago. So the relevance of the 2 comparison being made to those projects is 3 inapt. Quite notably, the variance requested 4 is not the minimum necessary. To the 5 detriment of the community and environment 6 because the proposed structures have not been 7 located as far landward as possible. And 8 they are too close to the dune. The proposed 9 4600 square resident is three times the 10 minimum required in the code. Three times . 11 And finally the proposed structures is out of 12 character with the community. True there has 13 been some newer homes built. Somewhat larger 14 than older ones . This is a beach community 15 of small cottages in the traditional style. 16 So in summary, I believe the application for 17 a Coastal Erosion Hazard Permit should be 18 denied. And the petition for a variance 19 should not be granted because to do so, will 20 deviate in every meaningful way from the 21 better and spirit of the laws in Southold, 22 which were designed to protect the 23 environment and server and preserve our 24 community. And I would like to just note the 25 absence of Louise Harrison who would like to 89 1 be here . So I offer a transcript of the 2 Public Hearing before the trustees in which 3 Ms . Harrison spoke and other people who 4 aren' t here as well . And finally, I would 5 like to ask if you could please keep the 6 record open for two more weeks . So that 7 other members of the public can comment. 8 Thank you very much. 9 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: Who else 10 would like to address the Town Board on this 11 Public Hearing? 12 MR. JOHN BETSCH: My name is John 13 Betsch. I had to stand up here because 14 apparently I have bene very popular today. I 15 am a little surprised with the use of my home 16 as a comparison. Several differences. One, 17 I had an existing home. The concern was at 18 the time, increase of more than 200 . That 19 was the concern. Secondly, that was over 20 20 years ago. Things have changed considerably. 21 Different code. Different place. Mr. 22 Bombara' s house has been brought there. 23 There was no house there. I had an existing 24 house. I think that would be a better 25 comparison. I would consider myself a 90 1 property -- I believe people who do own 2 property have rights to do what they -- in 3 owning a property, they do have specific 4 rights . Those rights can' t trample or 5 incumber other surrounding areas . I am not 6 opposed to a home there at all, but it should 7 fit. You don' t have the original proposals. 8 This goes back to July, August. The first 9 proposal presented included a stock-like 10 catwalk to the gazebo to the water. I think 11 that kind of inferred the understanding to 12 our area and what should be included. That 13 was taken out but subsequent proposals did 14 have similar banes of inclusion. I think 15 that is why the Trustees denied it . And 16 there is lot of statements that have been 17 made. I will just throw in one last thing. 18 Jim King, the president of the Trustees, once 19 told me, when he started as a Trustee, he 20 believed everything everybody said. After a 21 while as a Trustee, he believed nothing that 22 they say. And I have to -- living here now, 23 in my 20 something years . I totally 24 understand it. I am living here forever and 25 the next day it is flipped. That is my 91 1 concern. Thank you. 2 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: Who else 3 would like to address the Town Board on this 4 particular Public Hearing? 5 MS . MISSY: I have one on Zoom. 6 MS . ANNE MURRAY: Anne Murray here. 7 I am a resident of East Marion. I am 8 speaking on behalf of the North Fork 9 Environmental Council . As I did in Bombara 10 all those years ago, I strongly urge the 11 Board not to grant this Coastal Erosion 12 Hazard Permit. I agree with the previous 13 speaker, this is totally self created 14 hardship. And the fact that somebody would 15 buy this parcel after all the hurricanes, 16 after what Mr. Bombara went through and fully 17 knowing, I am sure, that they are building in 18 a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. To me it ' s 19 just foolish. And I think this is an 20 environmental sensitive area that shouldn' t 21 be built on. I can be a property rights 22 person but not in the case of a self-created 23 hardship. And I also agree with what Mr. 24 Betsch said earlier. It ' s possible that this 25 property could be flipped in one or two 92 1 years . What is the Town Board' s interest in 2 here? Is the Town Board interest in 3 protecting Southold' s environment or is the 4 Town Board interest in protecting property 5 rights? You decide. Thank you very much. 6 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: Thank 7 you. Anybody else from Zoomland? 8 (No Response. ) 9 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: Anybody 10 else like to address the Town Board on this? 11 (No Response. ) 12 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: I would 13 ask the Board -- 14 MR. JOHN BETSCH: I did want to say 15 that Bob Bombara did text me and say that he 16 is sorry he couldn' t be here because of the 17 weather. That' s all . 18 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: I was going to 19 ask what is -- what are your thoughts as far 20 as where we should be going next? Regarding 21 this next? 22 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: That is 23 what the Town Board is discussing now and I 24 am going to accept a motion from any member 25 of the Board as to what they think? 93 1 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : I make a 2 motion we close the hearing but leave it open 3 for two weeks for written comments. 4 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Second. 5 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: All in 6 favor? 7 JUSTICE LOUISA EVANS: Aye. 8 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Aye. 9 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : Aye. 10 COUNCILMAN BRIAN MEALY: Aye . 11 COUNCILWOMAN SARAH NAPPA: Aye. 12 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: Aye. 13 If I could just ask some 14 information. I brought up the issue of the 15 buildable lot land. Would you be able to 16 provide that to me, for the written portion 17 of the -- that would be required to the Board 18 anyway. 19 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: So we will 20 give you the buildable lot area based on our 21 line -- so let me -- 22 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: 23 Buildable plan based on the current code and 24 non-buildable area -- 25 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: No. So that is 94 1 part -- let me just clarify. Bombara case, 2 they went to the Zoning Board. The Zoning 3 Board determined that the code says you have 4 zero buildable land under the Coastal Erosion 5 Law. So the street -- you have nothing. 6 Zero. 7 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: I get 8 that. 9 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: So I am not 10 giving you a zero because -- 11 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: I get 12 that. The provisional upland buildable area. 13 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: So I will 14 assume the line that we have as the 15 development environmental land being the 16 acceptable line of the -- our wetland Coastal 17 Erosion appeal line. From that point to the 18 street. And that buildable -- that being the 19 buildable area as the Zoning Board has 20 determined in the Bombara case, they used -- 21 from that same line as we extrapolated and 22 put onto our plan, they took that area and 23 they developed based on that square footage; 24 correct? 25 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Yes . 95 1 Be aware that we might not agree with that 2 line. 3 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: 4 Typically a survey will calculate the upland 5 buildable area based on the written content 6 of the code. 7 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: That is the 8 problem. Our code says that -- you' re 9 developing from -- 10 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: For 11 now, you can do what you have as a line. As 12 close enough for what we want right now. 13 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : I just 14 want to be clear, we ' re not affirming that 15 line -- 16 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: That is 17 what I wast to be clear about. I am not 18 affirming -- I would say for now, given 19 Scott' s -- 20 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: Given that the 21 Board has not come to an agreement with that 22 line, I would ask that the record, that the 23 hearing remain open because we need your 24 input and if we need to get more TM -- 25 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: You know 96 1 what, then you decide if you can' t comply 2 within two weeks . 3 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : That is 4 fine. 5 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: You have 6 no obligation to submit -- 7 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: - I -- 8 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: If it ' s 9 too difficult or too ambitious. That is 10 fine. I understand. 11 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: That is not my 12 point. I can get you the buildable area 13 based on the definition from our development 14 line. I can get that to you pretty quickly. 15 As far as when I hear from the Board members 16 and say that they' re not really 1000 17 convinced that we ' re accepting the line that 18 we have drawn as the development line, I want 19 to leave that issue -- if the majority of the 20 Board is not accepting that line, I need to 21 address it because we have given you our 22 expert opinions on how we came to that line. 23 If you find in your deliberations, gee, I 24 still have a question -- 25 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: I am 97 1 going to withdraw my request, 2 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : I would 3 like to make a clear statement that I don' t 4 think that is what is before us today. I in 5 asking those line of questions, I am nearly 6 trying to get your understanding of what it 7 is . What is before us today is strictly an 8 appeal of the Trustees decision. On the 9 Coastal Erosion application. It ' s not -- 10 it ' s not up to decide where that line is . 11 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: We 12 appreciate all of the input and the argument 13 that you make and presentation you made. I 14 will withdraw my request so that I am not 15 asking you to calculate based on the line 16 that the Town Board, as a. Group of 6 people. 17 So I will withdraw my -- 18 MS . PATRICIA MOORE: So -- 19 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: And we 20 will make decisions based on the public 21 comment and written comment that we get in 22 the next two weeks . 23 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : We' re 24 closed. 25 MR. JOHN ARMENTANO: Just for some 98 1 clarification, I am an attorney, John 2 Armentano with Farrell Fritz . Representing 3 the applicant. That public comment period 4 also allows us to provide further written -- 5 SUPERVISOR SCOTT RUSSELL: Yes . 6 Public comment is closed. It ' s the written 7 -- absolutely. 8 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY: Anybody 9 can submit. 10 11 (Whereupon, the matter concluded at 12 this time. ) 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 99 1 C E R T I F I C A T I O N 2 3 I, JESSICA DILALLO, a Court Reporter 4 and Notary Public, for and within the State 5 of New York, do hereby certify: 6 THAT the above and foregoing contains 7 a true and correct transcription of the 8 meeting held on February 28, 2023 . 9 I further certify that I am not 10 related to any of the parties to this action 11 by blood or by marriage and that I am in no 12 way interested in the outcome of this matter. 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto 14 set my hand this 15th day of March 14 23 . 15 16 17 5Jessica DiLallo 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Tomaszewski, Michelle - ---_� From: Richard Bird <Richardb26@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2023 8:00 AM To: Russell, Scott FEB 2 E 2023 Cc: Evans, Louisa; Doherty,Jill; Doroski, Greg; Mealy, Brian Subject: North Sea Drive Trustees 'row CfCrk Dear Board Members: Our elected trustees have done a great job in reviewing the proposed development on the last remaining lot on North Sea Drive. They are faced with a daunting task of protecting our environment not only in this application but many many that are being proposed. Time and time again we have seen applications approved with stipulation for non disturbed areas, restrictions on lawns etc only to be ignored by land owners. I encourage the town board to stand behind the Trustees on this decision and future decisions. I would also encourage Southold Town Land Preservation Tax to start being used to purchase these small and unique lots that we have left. Many of those Land Preservation dollars have been generated by real estate sales within our Kenneys Beach area and SHOULD be spent in the neighborhood that the dollars came from. Now would be a perfect time to try to make this happen. Sincerely Richard Bird Lake Drive Southold Sent from my iPad ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 1 JOSEPH J. BURRASCANO JR. DONA BURRASCANO Box 987, Southold NY 11971 Page 1 of 2 February 23,2023 RECEIVED IED Town Board of the Town of Southold 53095 Main Road F E 0 2 3 2023 Southold New York 11971 Re: MKS Realty LLC Southold Town Clerk Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review Appeal Hearing date February 28,2023 Dear Board members, We are in opposition to the site plan of the proposed dwelling at 1925 North Sea drive in Southold on the basis of several valid points: 1. It is in violation of both the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)guidelines as well as the Southold Town Code. 2. The arguments regarding the applicability of a"pier line"to this project are unfounded and irrelevant. 3. The intent to enforce"precedent" is disingenuous and without merit as it can be argued that precedent in this specific case would in fact disallow the site plan as proposed. 4. Increasing incidence and intensity of destructive storms. Specifics: 1.Violation of chapter 148,section 2,Town of Southold Flood Damage Prevention. Section 148-2 states "...the Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider the danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the injury of others. If the proposed development may result in physical damage'. to any other property, no permit shall be issued."How can this be applied to the proposed site plan?Note that a very large portion of the house, most of its decking and the pool are situated in FEMA flood zone VE. According to FEMA,Flood Zone VE("coastal high-hazard area")has"potential for structural damage due to wave action,with the possibility of spread of debris along the beach, into the water,and onto adjoining properties."In other words,construction in this zone has the potential of sweeping materials onto other lands and damaging other properties-the exact wording of the Town Code.Therefore it is abundantly clear that no new construction should be permitted in FEMA flood zone VE. The house and related structures should be either repositioned or reduced in size to remain totally outside of this coastal hazard zone. 2.Pier Line The argument that construction up to an ill-defined"pier line" should be allowed is irrelevant in light of the obvious and clearly stated violations of rules mentioned above.In addition,the construction of many JOSEPH J. BURRASCANO JR. DONA BURRASCANO Box 987, Southold NY 11971 Page 2 of 2 of the structures along this beach predate coastal flood hazard regulations so to use this as an argument to allow potentially hazardous construction is without merit. 3.Precedent New construction and recent renovations along this beach all had to be situated landward of the edge of the demarcation of flood zone VE. An example: the house located at 2025 North Sea Drive is to the immediate east of the MKS property. Several decades ago the original house was expanded, and even though the original house, here since the 1960s, did project slightly into zone VE,the addition had to be pulled back and placed behind this line. This is a significant precedent that argues against allowing the MKS structures to encroach into this federally designated flood hazard area.The owners of the home at 2025 North Sea Drive followed the rules and built a smaller structure than originally planned.It would be unfair to exempt the MKS project from the rules that were enforced at the immediately adjacent property. A second precedent relates to the property to the immediate west of the MKS site. The entirety of this house is located behind the flood zone VE line. Significantly,the small pool on the site is in fact cantilevered over the property and affixed to the house, meaning that it does not at all encroach onto land in the VE zone. It is well known that the construction of this home did undergo intense scrutiny that resulted in design changes to accommodate coastal hazard rules, so this is another precedent that argues against allowing MKS to violate these rules. Finally, recalling that current coastal flood hazard rules came about as a result of recent highly destructive hurricanes,the reference to a precedent reflected by the older homes in this area is dangerous and in opposition to the intent and purpose of our flood zone rules now in force. 4.Increasing incidence and intensity of destructive storms. It is clear that we are being subject to an increasing number of intense storms. Hurricane Katrina, Hurricane Ian and Superstorm Sandy were all said to be"100 year storms". In light of this, it is relevant to consider the definition of flood zone VE: "Special Flood Hazard Areas along coasts subject to inundation by the 100-year flood with additional hazards due to velocity(wave action)." Since we recently have had three"100 year storms" isn't it prudent to enforce flood zone hazard rules, now more than ever? In light of all of the above, and even without the expected rise in sea level, it is now more clear than ever that local and federal rules and guidelines must be enforced and construction in coastal flood hazard zone VE must be prohibited. Thank you for your time and attention. Sincerely, J seph an Dona Burrascano TOWN BOARDFE8 2 7 2023 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD:NEW YO In the Matter of the Application of � �� '� W3 �; - AFFIDAVIT OF SIGN MKS REALTY LLC POSTING Regarding Posting of Sign Upon Applicant=s Land Identified as 100-54-4-20 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, PATRICIA C. MOORE, residing at Southold, New York being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the 171H day of February, 2023, I personally posted the property known as 1925 N. Sea Drive, SOUTHOLD, New York by placing the Town Board official Poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the post has remained in place for eight(8) days prior to.the date of the public hearing. Date of Hearing to be held on Tuesday, February 281h, 2023 at 9:00a.m. � Patricia C.Moore Sworn to before me this 20Z-N. day of ,-20'Z- Notary otary Public � l BE'TSYA.PERKINS Notary Public,State of New York No.01 PE6130636 Quallfled in Suffolk Cou22-z-") Commission Expires July 18, � f t 9 4sr'.r ; r� �1�!%'` ':fi �W�'`G1`6*���k'^E IarP�� ���:. �. �', y^. S' y ., r - �asc, ..r'l..s 1 jid, TOWN BOARD FEB 2 8 2023 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK Southold Town Clerk ---------------------------------------------------------------x In the Matter of the Application of AFFIDAVIT OF SIGN MKS REALTY LLC POSTING Regarding Posting of Sign Upon Applicant=s Land Identified as 100-54-4-20 ---------------------------------------------------------------x COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, PATRICIA C. MOORE, residing at Southold, New York being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the 17TH day of February, 2023, I personally posted the property known as 1925 N. Sea Drive, SOUTHOLD, New York by placing the Town Board official Poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the post has remained in place for eight(8) days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of Hearing to be held on Tuesday, February 28th, 2023 at 9:00a.m. Patricia C. Moore Sworn to before me this ZSR day of(e-b , 20 2 3 otary Public BETSYA PERKINS Notary Public,State of New York s No.01PE6130636 Qualified in Suffolk Counly- Commission Expires July 18, Z t r �ti. ti' r ti ._ r,��� �� � �� TOWN BOARD TOWN-OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x In the Matter of the Application of AFFIDAVIT OF MKS REALTY LLC MAILING Applicant=s Land Identified as 1000-54-4-20 RECEIVED ---------------------------------------------------------------x COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) FEB 2 4 2023 STATE OF NEW YORK) Southold Town Clerk I,BETSY PERKINS, residing at GREENPORT, New York,being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the 16TH Day of February, 2023, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Town Board Application, directed to each of the persons listed on the attached list at the addresses set below their respective names; that the addresses set below the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at Southold, New York, that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. Attached hereto is the white receipt post-marked by the So, old Post Office on said date. 01A " /BETSY PE G Sworn to before me 7) This le day of fZbYvav� 2p13 (Notary Public) KYLEE S DEFRESE NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No.01DE6420156 Qualified in Suffolk County My Commission Expires 08-02-2025 Ilk, MKS REALTY LLC TOWN BOARD HEARING NOTICE LETTER TO NEIGHBORS ROBERT G.BOMBARA 98-16 163PD AVE HOWARD BEACH NY 11414 SCTM: 1000-54-4-19 LOUIS &ELIZABETH MASTRO 25 COMPASS LANE LEVITTOWN NY 11756 SCTM: 1000-54-4-21 IRENE VITTI PO BOX 1337 SOUTHOLD NY 11971 SCTM: 1000-54-5-45.8 JOSEPH&DONNA BURRASCANO 2120 N. SEA DRIVE SOUTHOLD NY 11971 SCTM: 1000-54-5-45.4 RECEIPT RECEIPT RECEIPT 14 7000 0000 0000 0003 00 14 7000 0000 0000 0003 17 RECEIPT 14 7000 0000 0000 0003 31 7000 0000 0000 0003 24 ROM: 14 ROM: FROM: oore Law Office oore Law Office ROM: MKS Realty LLC :MKS Realty LLC oore Law Office oore Law office E MKS Realty LLC MKS Realty LLC END TO: END TO: ter- �s ,". y;= SEND TO! Obert G..Bombara V Y uip,B;Sizabeth Mastro j END T.Q: r n1.D, 16163rtl Avenue'•. )ti Com ass Lane tau v1 D N seph 8 Donoa Burrascan07) ne Vffi'`� owai`'each,NY 11414 ';��� vittow�n,NY 11756 '\r Boxd33T��—`W 7 120 N.Sea 66e \,�j 9 outh0liilY 11971 /01/ r r 41 uthold;NY 11971 Lo I Lu EES: EES: 5,:;ii c f { E5 U r i t FEES. stagel 060 /+ dC�{ stage. r0.et7!' EES:\ / ossa e ertfiedJee� 4,15-7y' I-e-e rtifiedFee -. 4:15 stage'^ � � erifiedFeel etumReceipt- d_� ,3i35f!' tur'Receipt,SpQ f3:35 ertifietl•pee��.�e_p 4.15., etum Reipt!y� 3estrided ' I1- S p0 strided -- —= etum Recel f j t .g 35' estrida TOTAL $4-9 2�p TOTAL $ga& ��`I estrided __ = TOTAL OSTMARK OR DATE POSTMARK OR DATE OTAL $�8'tA POSTMARK OR�� POSTMARK OR DATE i 5738a463-adOb-4b78-9a9f-e98cc572b876 lynda.rudder@town.southold.ny.us AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Suffolk Times i 1 State of New York, County of,Suffolk, The undersigned is the authorized designee of The Suffolk Times,a Weekly Newspaper published in Suffolk County, New York. I certify that the public notice,a printed copy of which is attached hereto, was printed and published in this newspaper on the following dates: February 09,2023 This newspaper has been designated by the County Clerk of Suffolk County,as a newspaper of record in this county,and as such,is eligible to publish such notices. Signature Eliot T. Putnam Printed Name Subscribed and sworn to before me, This 15 day of February 2023 C iatany.Slg MARY BETH ALESCIO WALLING NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK Registration No.01AL5056219 Qualified in Saratoga County My Commission Expires March 04,2026 Notary Public Stamp i i SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK 1 i I i i i 5738a463-adOb-4b78-9a9f-e98cc572b876 lynda.rudder@town.sout hold.ny.us t AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION r The Suffolk Times i LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Board of the Town of Southold sets February 28,2023 at 9:00 a.m. in the Town Meeting Hall,53095 Main Road,Southold, New York 11971,as the time and place for a public hearing on the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review Appeal of MKS Realty, LLC, relating to a proposed new single- family dwelling,garage,swimming pool and deck proposed to be located at 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold,SCTM#1000-54-4-20, and directs the Town Clerk to publish notice of such appeal in The Suffolk Times not less than ten (10)days nor more than thirty(30) days prior to such hearing and to notify the applicant by first class mail. Dated:January 31,2023 BY NOTICE OF THE TOWN BOARD DENIS NONCARROW SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK i SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK 2 LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Board of the Town of Southold sets February 28, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. in the Town Meeting Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold,New York 11971, as the time and place for a public hearing on the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review Appeal of MKS Realty, LLC, relating to a proposed new single-family dwelling, garage, swimming pool and deck proposed to be located at 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold, SCTM #1000-54-4-20, and directs the Town Clerk to publish notice of such appeal in The Suffolk Times not less than ten(10) days nor more than thirty (3 0) days prior to such hearing and to notify the applicant by first class mail. Dated: January 31, 2023 BY NOTICE OF THE TOWN BOARD DENIS NONCARROW SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Denis Noncarrow, Town Clerk of the Town of Southold,New York being duly sworn, says that on the 2nd day of February , 2023, a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy was affixed, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, 53095 Main Road;Southold,New York and the Southold Town website, www.southoldtownny.gov . PH 2/28 9:00 am—MKS Realty LLC Coastal Er osio App al Denis Noncarrow Southold Town Clerk Sworn before me this 211 day of Februa , 2021. 31Notary Public LYNDA M. RUDDER (Votary Public, state of New York No. 01 RU6020932 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires March 8, 2QI.2> RESOLUTION 2023-151 ADOPTED DOC ID: 18853 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 2023-151 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON JANUARY 31, 2023: IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold sets February 28, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. in the Town Meeting Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold,New York 11971, as the time and place for a public hearing on the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review Appeal of MKS Realty, LLC, relating to a proposed new single-family dwelling, garage, swimming pool and deck proposed to be located at 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold, SCTM#1000-54-4-20, and directs the Town Clerk to publish notice of such appeal in The Suffolk Times not less than ten (10) days nor more than thirty (3 0) days prior to such hearing and to notify the applicant by first class mail. Denis Noncarrow Southold Town Clerk RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Sarah E.Nappa, Greg Doroski SECONDER:Louisa P. Evans, Justice AYES; Nappa, Doroski, Mealy, Doherty, Evans, Russell �gUFi01KC RESOLUTION 2023-151 ADOPTED DOC ID: 18853 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 2023-151 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON JANUARY 31, 2023: IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold sets February 28, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. in the Town Meeting Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold,New York 11971, as the time and place for a public hearing on the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review Appeal of MKS Realty, LLC, relating to a proposed new single-family dwelling, garage, swimming pool and deck proposed to be located at 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold, SCTM#1000-54-4-20, and directs the Town Clerk to publish notice of such appeal in The Suffolk Times not less than ten (10) days nor more than thirty (3 0) days prior to such hearing and to notify the applicant by first class mail. Denis Noncarrow Southold Town Clerk -RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Sarah E. Nappa, Greg Doroski SECONDER:Louisa P. Evans, Justice AYES: Nappa, Doroski, Mealy, Doherty, Evans, Russell Rudder, Lynda From: Reisenberg, Lloyd Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2023 12:12 PM To: Rudder, Lynda Subject: RE: MKS Realty CE Appeal.docx Posted Lloyd H. Reisenberg Network and Systems Administrator Town of Southold, New York www.southoldtownny.gov Iloydr@southoldtownny.gov 0: 631-765-18911 C:631-879-1554 I F: 631-765-5178 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication with its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication. From: Rudder, Lynda <lynda.rudder@town.southold.ny.us> Sent:Thursday, February 2, 2023 12:10'PM To: Lisa Finn (lisaahfinn@gmail.com)<lisaahfinn@gmail.com>; Reisenberg, Lloyd <Lloyd.Reisenberg@town.southold.ny.us>;Tomaszewski,Zachary<zact@southoldtownny.gov>; Doherty,Jill <jill.doherty@town.southold.ny.us>; Doroski, Greg<greg.doroski@town.southold.ny.us>;-Louisa Evans <Ipevans06390@gmail.com>; Mealy, Brian <brian.mealy@town.southold.ny.us>; Nappa, Sarah - <sarah.nappa@town.southold.ny.us>; Noncarrow, Denis<denisn@southoldtownny.gov>; Norklun, Stacey <Stacey.Norklun@town.southold.ny.us>; Russell,Scott<Scott.Russe II@town.southoId.ny.us>;Standish, Lauren <Lauren.Standish@town.southold.ny.us>;Tomaszewski, Michelle<michellet@town.southold.ny.us>; DeChance, Paul <pauld@southoldtownny.gov>; Mirabelli, Melissa <melissa.mirabelli@town.southold.ny.us> Subject: MKS Realty CE Appeal.docx Importance: High Please publish to the Town website 1 Noncarrow, Denis From: Cantrell, Elizabeth Sent: Thursday,January 19, 2023 5:00 PM To: Noncarrow, Denis; 'e-mailcontact@dec.ny.gov'; DiSalvo, Diane; Doherty,Jill; Doroski, Greg; Louisa Evans; Mealy, Brian; Nappa, Sarah; Norklun, Stacey; Rudder, Lynda; Russell, Scott; Standish, Lauren;Tomaszewski, Michelle; Mirabelli, Melissa; DeChance, Paul Cc: Born, Sabrina; Mudd, Jennifer Subject: RE: Coastal Erosion Appeal./ MKS Realty Good Afternoon, Regarding the Coastal Erosion Appeal for MKS Realty, below is the Weblink/Laserfische link to the Board of Trustees determination of denial file in order to assist you in your review. http•//24 38 28 228.2040/weblink/Docyiew aspx?dbid=0&id=1151076&page=1&cr=1 544" epee Senior Office Assistant Town of Southold Board of Trustees Office: 631-765-1892 Email: elizabethc@southoldtownny.gov From: Noncarrow, Denis<denisn@southoldtownny.gov> Sent:Wednesday,January 18, 2023 1:36 PM To: 'e-mailcontact@dec.ny.gov' <e-maiicontact@dec.ny.gov>; DiSalvo, Diane<diane.disalvo@town.southold.ny.us>; Cantrell, Elizabeth <elizabethc@town.southold.ny.us>; Doherty,Jill <jill.doherty@town.southold.ny.us>; Doroski, Greg <greg.doroski@town.southold.ny.us>; Louisa Evans<lpevans06390@gmail.com>; Mealy, Brian <brian.mealy@town.southold.ny.us>; Nappa, Sarah <sarah.nappa@town.southold.ny.us>; Noncarrow, Denis <denisn@southoldtownny.gov>; Norklun,Stacey<Stacey.Norklun @town.southold.ny.us>; Rudder, Lynda <lynda.rudder@town.southold.ny.us>; Russell, Scott<Scott.Russell @town.southold.ny.us>; Standish, Lauren <Lauren.Standish@town.southold.ny.us>;Tomaszewski, Michelle<michellet@town.southold.ny.us>; Mirabelli, Melissa . <melissa.mirabelli@town.southold.ny.us>; DeChance, Paul <pauld@southoldtownny.gov> Cc: Born, Sabrina <sabrina.born@town.southold.ny.us>; Mudd,Jennifer<jennifer.mudd@town.southold.ny.us> Subject: Coastal Erosion Appeal./ MKS Realty Please see link below to an Application for a Coastal Erosion hazard review. Thank you Denis Noncarrow Southold Town Clerk. Town of Southold, New York www.southoldtownny.gov denisn PsoutholdtownnY.gov 631-765-1800 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication with its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is 1 ¢y' prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication. From: Norklun, Stacey Sent:Wednesday,January 18, 2023 1:18 PM To: Noncarrow, Denis<denisn@southoldtownny_.gov> Subject: MKS Here is the link to the MKS Realty Coastal Erosion file: http•//24 38 28 228:2040/weblinl</0/doc/1260423/Pagel.aspx z Glenn Goldsmith, President o��®F S®(��y®l Town Hall Annex A.Nicholas Krupski,Vice President ® 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Eric Sepenoski Southold, New York 11971 Liz Gillooly ,c G � Telephone(631) 765-1892 Elizabeth Peeples �® a® Fax(631) 765-6641 �yCOW,�� BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RECEIVED Minutes SEP 1 5 2022 Wednesday, August 17, 2022 5:30 PM SOUth®ld Town Clerk Present Were Glenn Goldsmith, President A. Nicholas Krupski, Trustee Eric Sepenoski, Trustee Liz Gillooly, Trustee Elizabeth Peeples, Trustee Elizabeth Cantrell, Senior Clerk Typist Lori Hulse, Board Counsel CALL MEETING TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Good evening, and welcome to our Wednesday, August 17, 2022, meeting. At this time I would like to call the meeting to order and ask that you please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. (Pledge of Allegiance is recited). TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: We'll start off the meeting by announcing the people on the dais. To my left we have Trustee Sepenoski, Trustee Gillooly and Trustee Peeples. To my right we have attorney for the Trustees Lori Hulse, we have Senior Clerk Typist Elizabeth Cantrell. With us tonight is court stenographer Wayne Galante, and from the Conservation Advisory Council we have Carol Brown. Agendas for tonight's meeting are located out in the hallway and on the Town's website. We do have a number of postponements tonight. They are listed as follows: In the agenda, on page five, number 1, Costello Marine Contracting Corp. on behalf of FOUNDERS LANDING BOAT YARD, LLC requests an Amendment to Wetland Permit#8666 for the as-built 68' long solid splashboard system under the offshore fixed finger pier. Located: 2700 Hobart Road & 1000 Terry Lane, Southold. SCTM# 1000-64-3-10 & 1000-64-3-11 On page six, number 3, J.M.O. Environmental Consulting on behalf of J. GEDDES PARSONS requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to remove the existing 5'x81' fixed dock and piles (16), 3'x20' ramp and 9'x18' floating dock; construct a proposed 5'x81' fixed Board of Trustees 2 August 17, 2022 dock secured by sixteen (16) piles; install a 4'x16' adjustable ramp; and install an 8'x18.5' floating dock situated in an "I" configuration and secured by four (4) piles; and to replace the five (5) existing tie-off piles as needed. Located: 515 Sterling Street, Fishers Island. SCTM# 1000=10-9-3.1 On page seven, number 4, JMO Environmental Consulting on behalf of W. HARBOR BUNGALOW, LLC, c/o CRAIG SCHULTZ requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit for the existing 6.5'x53' fixed dock with a 11'x11' fixed portion in an "L" configuration; existing 3.5'x12' ramp and existing 8'x20' floating dock; the 6.5'x53' fixed dock and 11'x11' fixed portion in the "L" configuration to remain; remove existing ramp, float and two piles and install a new 4'x20' ramp with rails and an 8'x18' floating dock situated in an "I" configuration secured by four piles; and to install four tie-off piles. Located: 371 Hedge Street, Fishers Island. SCTM# 1000-10-7-18 On page nine, number 11, Suffolk Environmental Consulting on behalf of TOWN CREEK REAL ESTATE, INC., c/o MICHAEL LIEGY requests a Wetland Permit to construct a proposed 25'x50' two-story, single-family dwelling with attached 20'x20' garage; install a pervious driveway; install a new I/A OWTS system; and to install gutters to leaders to drywells to contain roof runoff. Located: 480 Ackerly Pond Road, Southold. SCTM# 1000-69-3-13 On page nine, number 12, Suffolk Environmental Consulting on behalf of KAAN ILGIN requests a Wetland Permit to mitigate the existing clearing by re-vegetating a 14,257sq.ft. area by installing native plantings throughout the disturbed area, and by preserving 68,134sq.ft. of existing vegetation; install 372 linear feet of fencing along the rear of the existing dwelling to provide a physical demarcation of the upland and wetland areas; for the existing 8'x12' shed; and to maintain a 4' wide access path to the water. Located: 3525 Paradise Point Road, Southold. SCTM# 1000-81-1-15.8 & 15.9 On page ten, numbers 13 through 17: Number 13, Raymond Nemschick, AIA on behalf of ROGER SIEJKA requests a Wetland Permit to construct a two-story, single-family dwelling with a basement; first floor is 24'5" wide by 50'0" deep; front porch is 11'0" wide, 6'2" deep; rear veranda (deck) is 24'5" wide by 10' deep; and overall max height is 32'3". Located: 955 Blossom Bend, Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-115-6-22 Number 14, Jeffrey Patanjo on behalf of ANGELIKI KAZEROS & GEORGE PLITAS requests a Wetland Permit to construct a proposed 4' wide by 193' long fixed catwalk with a 14' long by 3' wide aluminum ramp and a 6' wide by 20' long floating dock situated in an "L" configuration and secured with two (2) 10" diameter piles. Located: 1395 Sleepy Hollow Lane, Southold. SCTM# 1000-78-1-10.20 Number 15, Charles Thomas R.A., PLLC on behalf of MARY HOELTZEL requests a Wetland Permit to demolish existing 28'x59.6' dwelling to first floor deck and demolish existing 20'x20.2' detached garage; construct a proposed 32'x104.2' (2,278sq.ft.) two-story dwelling with seaward side covered porch and attached garage consisting of the proposed dwelling to be 32'x63.4', proposed attached garage to be 22'x31'; the proposed Board of Trustees 3 August 17, 2022 dwelling will be using the same foundation and first floor deck of existing dwelling with additions to the east and north; construct a proposed 10.6'x29' covered porch with a 10.6'x29'second story balcony above; a proposed 1'4.6'x26.4' patio on east side and partially covered by a second story bump=out; construct a.5'x8.6' covered.front porch; and for the existing 7.10'x12.4' shed landward of dwelling to remain. Located: 6190 Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel. SCTM# 1000-128-2-5 Number 16, En-Consultants on behalf of DANIEL McGOVERN & CATHERINE LUCARELLI requests a Wetland Permit to remove existing_ 3'x4.5' steps, and construct a fixed timber dock with water and electricity consisting of a 4'x60' fixed timber catwalk (53' seaward of bulkhead), constructed with untreated decking (including open-grate decking at least 15' seaward of bulkhead), with two (2) 4'x6' steps for beach access; a 3'x14' hinged ramp; and a 6'x20'floating dock situated in an "L" shaped configuration and secured by two (2) 8" diameter pilings. Located: 830 Oak Avenue, Southold. SCTM# 1000-77-1-4 Number 17, SLATTERY NASSAU POINT TRUST requests a Wetland Permit to replace the existing 4'x16' set of stairs; 12'x18' deck; and 4'x32' walk; deck and walk are 30" AGL. Located: 460 West Cove Road, Cutchogue. SCTM# 1000-111-2-6 On page 11, numbers 18 through 22: Number 18, En-Consultants on behalf of ELIAS DAGHER requests a Wetland Permit to remove existing wood platform, walk and steps; construct a fixed timber dock with water and electricity consisting of a 4'x74' fixed timber catwalk constructed with open-grate decking; with two (2) 4'x6' steps for beach access; a 3'x14' hinged ramp; and a 6'x20' floating dock situated in a "T" configuration and secured by two (2) 8" diameter pilings. Located: 90 Oak Avenue, Southold. SCTM# 1000-77-2-6 Number 19, BRIDGET CLARK requests a Wetland Permit for the existing 20'3"x22'4" (452sq.ft.) detached garage and to convert it into an accessory apartment by replacing existing windows, exterior door, add plumbing to connect to existing septic, and install a wall mounted electric heating unit. Located: 7825 Soundview Avenue, Southold. SCTM# 1000-59-6-15 Number 20, Michael Kimack on behalf of NUNNAKOMA WATERS ASSOCIATION, INC. requests a Wetland Permit to perform work on the property Iodated at 645 Wampum Way (1000-87-2-42.3), consisting of installing 235 linear feet of Shore Guard 9900 vinyl hybrid low-sill bulkhead with helical supports installed at discretion of contractor; restore approximately 200 linear feet of eroded bank with 90-100 cubic yards of sand recovered from storm deposit area; install filter fabric (±1,600sq.ft.), and plant American Beach grass @ 18" on center (±1,200 plants) over restored bank area; construct.storm water concrete diversion swale (10'x43', 430sq.ft.) with rip-rap runoff area (10'x20', 200sq.ft.), consisting of 50-150 Ib. Stones set on filter fabric; the storm washed sand area is to be restored to the original grade line and the removed sand (90-100 cubic yards) is to be used on site to restore the eroded bank area; on Board of Trustees 4 August 17, 2022 all three properties, dredge a portion of Moyle Cove to deepen channel in three (3) areas, AA, BB and CC to a depth of-4.00ft. (Approx. 365 cubic yards), and area DD to a depth of-3.00ft. (Approx. 85 cubic yards), for a total dredging of approximately 450 cubic yards; the dredge spoils is proposed to be spread on the two Sauer properties (255 Wigwam Way, SCTM# 1000-87-2-40.1 & 175 Wigwam Way, SCTM# 1000-87-2-40.2), in an area of approximately 8,000 sq.ft. and to a depth of approximately 1.5ft.; the dredged spoils placement area will be surrounded by a silt fence with hay bales to be kept in place and maintained until the spoils are de-watered. Located: 645 Wampum Way, 255 Wigwam Way & 175 Wigwam Way, Southold. SCTM#s 1000-87-2-42.3, 1000-87-2-40.1 & 1000-87.-2-40.2 Number 21, Jeffrey Patanjo on behalf of SADIK HALIT LEGACY TRUST requests a Wetland Permit for the as-built bluff stairs consisting of the following: 4'x4' at-grade top landing to an 8,2'x9.5' upper platform to 18'x4' steps down to an 8'x3.8' middle platform to 16'x4' steps down to a 19.4'x10' lower platform to 14.5'x4' steps down to beach; all decking on structure is of untreated lumber. Located: 2200 Sound Drive, Greenport. SCTM# 1000-33-1-16 Number 22, Cole Environmental Services on behalf of SCOTT & LEA VITRANO requests a Wetland Permit to remove existing pier and float; construct a proposed 4'x14' landward ramp leading to a 4'x35' fixed pier with Thru-Flow decking a minimum of 4' above wetlands; a proposed 3'x12' metal ramp; and a 4'x20' floating dock situated in a "T" configuration and secured by two (2) 8" diameter piles. Located: 3875 Main Bayview Road, Southold. SCTM# 1000-78-2-15.1 And on page 12, number 23, Cole Environmental Services on behalf of JUSTIN &ALLISON SCHWARTZ requests a Wetland Permit to construct a proposed 4'x165' fixed pier with open grate decking a minimum of 4' above tidal vegetative grade; a 3'x16' aluminum ramp; a 6'x20' floating dock situated in an "T" configuration; and to install a natural path leading from upland to fixed pier using permeable material. Located: 2793 Cox Neck Road, Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-113-8-7.6 All of those are postponed, so there will not be a public hearing on those tonight. Under Town Code Chapter 275-8(c), files were officially closed seven days ago. Submission of any paperwork after that date may result in a delay of the processing of the application. I. NEXT FIELD INSPECTION: TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: At this time I will make a motion to hold our next field inspection on Wednesday, September 7th, 2022, at 8:00 AM. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). II. NEXT TRUSTEE MEETING TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Motion to hold our next Trustee meeting Wednesday, September 14th, 2022, at 5:30 PM at the Town Hall Main Meeting Hall. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Second. Board of Trustees 5 August 17, 2022 TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). III. WORK SESSIONS: TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: I'll make a motion to hold our next work session, Monday, September 12th, 2022, at 5:00 PM, at the Town Hall Annex 2nd floor Executive Board Room; and no Wednesday, September 12th, 2022, at 5:00 PM at the Town Hall Main Meeting Hall. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). IV. MINUTES: TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: I'll make a motion to approve the Minutes of the July 13, 2022 meeting. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). V. MONTHLY REPORT: TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Under Roman numeral V, Monthly Report, the Trustees monthly report for July, 2022, a check for$10,377.85 was forwarded to the Supervisor's Office for the General Fund. VI. PUBLIC NOTICES TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Public notices are posted on the Town Clerk's bulletin board for review. VII. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEWS TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Under Roman numeral VII, State Environmental Quality Reviews: RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold hereby finds that the following applications more fully described in Section XI Public Hearings section of the Trustee agenda dated Wednesday, August 17, 2022, are classified as Type II Actions pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations, and are not subject to further review under SEQRA, as written. That is my motion. Abby Rosmarin & David Ross SCTM# 1000-99-3-4.1 MKS Realty, LLC SCTM# 1000-54-4-20 Kathleen & Lyle Girandola SCTM# 1000-128-6-10 Stephen & Jacqueline Dubon SCTM# 1000-137-4-3.2 Joseph F. & Linda Sciotto SCTM# 1000-126-11-20 Joseph F. Barszczewski, Jr. SCTM# 1000-53-2-7 Board of Trustees 6 August 17, 2022 Gerard & Karen Diffley SCTM# 1000-115-11-14 DKJK Family Trust SCTM# 1000-115-12-13 Gerosa Family Trust SCTM# 1000-21-2-3 Michael &Argy Mantikas SCTM# 1000-37-6-3.5 Charles Snyder SCTM# 1000-35-4-28.24 Kaan Ilgin SCTM# 1000-81-1-15.8 & 15.9 Angeliki Kazeros & George Plitas SCTM# 1000-78-1-10.20 TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). VIII. RESOLUTIONS -ADMINISTRATIVE PERMITS: TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Under Roman numeral VIII, Resolutions Administrative Permits. In order to simplify our meeting, the Trustees regularly group together applications that are minor or similar in nature. As such, I make a motion to approve as a group Items 2 through 4. Number 2, SAMUEL SINGER requests an Administrative Permit to install an 8' high approximately 4,700 feet long deer fence around an 11 acre open field area. Located: 44030 Route 25, Southold. SCTM# 1000-75-6-6.1 Number 3, VINS KIMBERLY LLC requests a Ten (10) Year Maintenance Permit to hand-cut Common Reed (Phragmites australis) to not less than 12" in height by hand, as needed. Located: 1325 Kimberly Lane, Southold. SCTM# 1000-70-13-20.8 Number 4, SEAVILLE 641 LLC requests an Administrative Permit to remove existing front porch steps and replace stringers, risers &treads with new. Stair location to be maintained. Existing stair layout consist of(8) risers at 7 W high. Stairs are approximately 9'-6" wide and come out T-7" from face of porch; total existing steps area approximately =.77 SF; Related improvements would include stair footing replacement as well as related cosmetic improvements such as new railings; Front Entry Porch and steps 432 SF; Rear Deck: Propose to maintain existing decking & rebuild structure from underneath; existing deck is approximately 52'-6"x 13-9" and has protruding stair landing that is 9'-6"x4'-2". Stairs are approximately 8'-8 x 4'-2". Stair& landing to be removed/relocated; total built area of existing deck, landing & stair= 797 SF; proposed rear deck maintains existing decking & provides for new relocated stairs 8'-3"x 4'-6. Total of 10 risers @ 7" (11" treads) new skirting and new railing; construct new roofed over, screened-in area is to be constructed on top of/part of existing deck; The screened in area on top of the existing decking is within the footprint of the existing deck. The screened space will be open air and unconditioned; Screened in area is 15'-0"x 13'-9" or 203 SF. Located: 1035 Sebastian Cove Road, Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-100-3-11.14 TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Second. Board of Trustees 7 August 17, 2022 TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Number 1, Thomas'C. Wolpert, P.E., on behalf of JONATHAN REBELL & NOAH LEVINE requests an Administrative Permit to conduct construction activity within 100'from the landward edge of wetlands for the construction of a new 1,786sq.ft. two-story frame dwelling with a 241sq.ft. screen porch, a 497sq.ft. deck with trellis and 69sq.ft. stairs to ground, a 255sq.ft. side porch with 121 sq.ft. stairs to ground, an 800sq.ft. swimming pool; one (1) 8' dia. By 10' effect. Depth discharge drywell for the pool., new I/A sanitary system and removal of existing conventional sewage disposal system. Located: 4790 Blue Horizon Bluffs, Peconic. SCTM# 1000-74-1-35.56 The LWRP found this application to be consistent. Trustee Peeples conducted a field inspection on August 1st, noting the need for gutters to leaders to drywells to contain roof runoff, as well as to move the drywell more than 100 feet from the top of the bluff. As such, I.will make a motion to approve this application with the condition of gutters to leaders to drywells to contain roof runoff, and that the drywell be moved landward of more than 100 feet from the top of bluff. TRUSTEE PE'EPLES: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? , (ALL AYES). IX. APPLICATIONS FOR EXTENSIONS/TRANSFERS/ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS: TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Under Roman numeral IX, Applications for Extensions, Transfers, Administrative Amendments. Similarly, I make a -motion to approve as a group items 1 through 14. They are listed as follows: Number 1, Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc., on behalf of STEVEN &JACI OSDOBY requests a One (1) Year Extension to Wetland Permit#9682, as issued on August 19, 2020. Located: 605 Bay Shore Road, Greenport. SCTM# 1000-53-3-8 Number 2, STEPHEN MERKLE & ERIKA SHALETTE request a One (1) Year Extension to Administrative Permit#9692A, as issued on September 16, 2020. Located: 1800 Little Peconic Bay Road, a/k/a 3700 Wunneweta Road, Cutchogue. SCTM# 1000411-14-20 Number 3, Frank W. Uellendahl on behalf of SUSAN &TIMOTHY MILANO requests the Final One (1) Year Extension to Wetland Permit#9519, as issued on August 14, 2019. Located: 745 Aquaview Avenue, East Marion. SCTM# 1000-21-2-9 Number 4, William C. Goggins, on behalf of MAIA KHUTSISHVILI requests a Transfer of Wetland Permit#63-7-38 from Janet Knight to Maia Khutsishvili, as issued on March 11, 1993; and for an Administrative Amendment to Wetland Permit#63-7-38 for as-built 4'x121.5' dock with 18' long steps and Board of Trustees 8 August 17, 2022 walkway in lieu of the previously approved 4'x105' dock; and 14.5'x22.8' deck over block boathouse. - Located: 1645 Calves Neck Road, Southold. SCTM# 1000-63-7-38 Number 5, En-Consultants on behalf of NORTH PARISH DRIVE, LLC requests a Transfer of Wetland Permit#10124 from John & Lynn Scott to North Parish Drive, LLC, as issued on April 13, 2022. Located: 495 North Parish Drive, Southold. SCTM# 1000-71-1-5 Number 6, SCOTT HASSILDINE requests a Transfer of Wetland Permit#1683 from Betty-Jean Hassildine & Others to Scott Hassildine & Others, as issued on September 27, 1983; and for an Administrative Amendment to Wetland Permit#1683 for the as-built 5'x30' wood walkway; 4'6"x22' fixed catwalk. Located: 2800 West Creek Avenue, Cutchogue. SCTM# 1000-110-1-11 Number 7, En-Consultants on behalf of NICOLE MARTORANA & DAVID ALWORTH requests'a Transfer of Wetland Permit#9279 from FHV, LLC to Nicole Martorana & David Alworth, as issued on July 18, 2018. Located: 3400 Deep Hole Drive, Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-115-17-11 Number 8, En-Consultants on behalf of NICOLE MARTORANA & DAVID ALWORTH requests a Transfer of Wetland Permit#9323 from Frank Martorana, Mindy Martorana & Bryan Martorana to Nicole Martorana & David Alworth, as issued on October 17, 2018. Located: 3400 Deep Hole Drive, Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-115-17-11 Number 9, ANTHONY & KAREN DeLORENZO request a Transfer of Wetland Permit#1952 from John Dempsey to Anthony & Karen DeLorenzo, as issued on May 1, 1985 and Amended on August 26, 1992; and for an Administrative Amendment to Wetland Permit #1952 for the as-built 4'x200' catwalk, in lieu of the previously approved 4'x180'. Located: 470 Haywaters Drive, Cutchogue. SCTM# 1000-104-5-21.1 Number 10, Suffolk Environmental Consulting on behalf of JAMES D. &VICKY VAVAS requests an Administrative Amendment to Wetland Permit#9995 to construct a 4'x4' egress window well. Located: 3165 Bay Shore Road, Greenport. SCTM# 1000-53-6-7 Number 11, ADF VENTURES LLC requests an Administrative Amendment to Administrative Permit#10134A to install an 18'x8'x5' "Endless" hot tub, to be recessed 24" below grade within the previously approved 16'x32' bluestone patio. Located: 17877 Soundview Avenue, Southold. SCTM# 1000-51-1-4 Number 12, PHILIP & LIA CHASEN request an Administrative Amendment to Wetland Permit#10095 for the as-built increased square footage of the pool patio to 2245 sq.ft in lieu of the previously approved 1850 sq.ft.; as-built 763" x 163" retaining wall with a 4' non-turf pathway seaward of retaining wall; establish and perpetually maintain the entire property seaward of pathway as a vegetated non-turf buffer; install 175' of fencing surrounding patio and on the retaining wall; proposed pool house (350sq.ft.) not to be constructed. Located: 1585 Long Creek Drive, Southold. SCTM# 1000-55-7-3 Number 13, KENNETH QUIGLEY requests an Administrative Amendment to Wetland Permit#9757 for a fixed Dock box 2'-6" x 5'-0" and rinse off station-2'-6" x 2'-6"; the addition of a Board of Trustees 9 August 17, 2022 third ladder on fixed pier (20" wide); increase kayak'launch to Tx 12' in lieu of.previously approved 5'x12'; one (1) -Access Steps Off Catwalk-48"Wide; water and electric; 2 - 12" Pilings (Tie Off Poles)- 24' apart and 12'from fixed Dock. Located: 2245 Little Peconic Bay Lane, Southold. SCTM#: 1000-90-1-16 Number 14, Eugene J. Burger on behalf of IRA & SUSAN AKSELRAD requests an Administrative Amendment to Wetland Permit #9926 to increase first story addition by 2' to 12'x31.2' (311.25sq;ft) in lieu of previously approved; construct a roof deck above the first story addition and extending 46.2 feet from the westerly end of the addition towards the seaward face of the existing dwelling 12' x 27.4' (274 sq.ft.) In lieu of previously approved; extend lower slab on grade terrace 12'x12.5' and relocate existing outdoor cooking equipment. Located: 4125 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue. SCTM# 1000-111-9-6.4 TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: (ALL AYES). X. MOORINGS/STAKE & PULLEY SYSTEMS. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Under Roman numeral X, I'll make a motion to approve number 1, DYLAN SZCZOTKA requests a Waterfowl/Duck Blind Permit to place a Waterfowl/Duck Blind in Narrow River using public access. Located: Narrow River, Orient TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES).' XI. PUBLIC HEARINGS: TRUSTEE'GOLDSMITH: Under Roman numeral XI, Public Hearings. At this time-I'll make a motion to go off our regular meeting agenda and enter into Public Hearings. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). This is a public hearing in the matter of the following applications for permits under the Wetlands Ordinance of the Town of Southold. I have an affidavit of publication from the Suffolk Times. Pertinent correspondence may be read prior to asking for.comments from the public. Please keep your comments organized and brief, five minutes or less, if possible. WETLAND & COASTAL EROSION PERMITS: TRUSTEE-GOLDSMITH: Under Wetland & Coastal Erosion Permits, Number 1, Jeffrey Patanjo on behalf of ABBY ROSMARIN &DAVID ROSS requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit for the as-built removal of an existing deteriorated 12.3'x17.2' stone patio and deteriorated landscape wall (north side), and replacement with'a new 24.5' x 19' & 13' semi-circle (on west side) on-grade Board of Trustees 10 August 17, 2022 paver patio in same location as previous patio; replacement of north side landscape wall with new±24".tall by 24.5' long paver block landscape wall and added,on an east side a ±24" tall by 19' long landscape wall, and on west side a ±24" tall by 8'1" long landscape wall; and an as-built built-in fire pit; all work is above the top of bluff line and flush with surrounding grade. Located: 640 Lloyd's Lane, Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-99-3-4.1 The LWRP found this to be inconsistent. The inconsistencies are the unpermitted as-built patio and landscape wall cannot be replaced according to Policy 6.3 because they had never received permits in the past. The enlargement of the patio is not recommended. Also, the as-built fire pit was constructed without a permit and is inconsistent with Policy 6.3. The Conservation Advisory Council resolved to not support the application for the as-built located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area, which includes 200 square-foot patio. The Trustees conducted a field inspection on August 9th, 2022. At the time we noted the extension for the landscape wall to be moved off the property line, as well as the need for a non-turf buffer. We did receive a new project description stamped received August 10th, 2022. Is there anyone here wishing to speak regarding this application? (No response). Any questions or comments from the Board? (No response). TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Hearing none, I'll make a motion to close this hearing. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Second. TRUSTEE-GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: I'll make a motion, since this was constructed, an illegal. _structure was constructed, reconstructed, without a permit, and is located at or on the bluff, adversely affecting the wetlands, I will make a motion to deny'this application, both the Wetland and Coastal Erosion. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). (UNIDENTIFIED VOICE): I am the applicant. I don't understand the process and my attorney is not here. So I don't know if I'm supposed to -- MS. HULSE: Thank you. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Number 2, Young & Young on behalf of MKS REALTY, LLC requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to construct a two-story 2,445sq.ft. footprint dwelling with garage; a proposed 21'10"x11'9" (253.5sq.ft.) seaward bedroom balcony with railing system; a proposed 10'4"x20'2" (191.7sq.ft.) mezzanine level bedroom balcony, railing system, a privacy screen wall along west side, and a 6' wide spiral staircase to ground; a 1,218.8sq.ft. elevated deck,with a 522sq.ft. pool on seaward side, privacy screening along portion of east side, a 3'9" wide stairs with railings to ground to west and a 3'6" stairs with railings to ground to east; proposed 10' wide bar/grill area on pool deck; seaward of pool to the east off pool patio, a proposed 203.6sq.ft. elevated (ranging from ±7.5' to 10' above natural grade) catwalk leading to a 127.9sq.ft. open air gazebo with flat roof over, 3'6" wide stairs with railings to ground, and 110.6sq.ft. storage area under gazebo; Board of Trustees 11 August 17, 2022 proposed 663sq.ft. of non-pervious front entry stairs; proposed 4,095sq.ft. of stone blend driveway; proposed 1,200 gallon underground propane tank; new I/A OWTS sanitary system, i.e. one (1) 500 gallon wastewater treatment unit and six (6) 8.5' long by 2' effect. Depth sanitary leaching galleys; public water service connection; new storm water control structures for roof runoff and driveway runoff; approximately 690 cubic yards of clean material from the excavated areas will be used to fill the site to the proposed grades; and all mechanical equipment (i.e. A/C unit), to be located above the second-story structure. Located: 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold. SCTM# 1000-54-4-20 The LWRP found this to be inconsistent. The inconsistencies are: The entire parcel is located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Violates Chapter 111-4. The purpose of the Town of Southold to regulate coastal areas subject to coastal flooding and erosion, land use and development activities so as to minimize or prevent damage or destruction to manmade property, natural protective features and other natural resources, and to protect human life. The entire structure is located within the VE Elevation 13 Flood Zone. VE coastal areas are subject to high-velocity waters, including waves, defined by the 1% annual chance of flood and wave effects three feet or greater. This means that the flood has a 1% chance of being met or exceeded in any given year. The parcel and any development on the parcel will be adversely impacted by Categories 1 through 4 hurricanes. The parcel will be adversely impacted by sea level rise over time. The proposed actions are located entirely within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area and the primary dune and natural protective feature. And a site visit of this area was conducted on October 17th, 2007. In attendance at the site visit, among others, were representatives of the Town of Southold Board of Trustees, the LWRP Coordinator Mark Terry, and New York State DEC Environment Program Specialist, Robert McDonough, which confirmed that the proposed actions are entirely located seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area line and was in a primary dune. This determination still applies. The Conservation Advisory Council resolved to not support the application. The proposed setbacks are too close to the wetland boundary within the primary and secondary dune, and within a flood zone. This is an environmentally sensitive area, and any development of this property would deplete the natural habitat. The Trustees conducted a field inspection on August 9th, noting that the proposed plans for the site include a crested structure on a site with a primary dune, exceeding the pier line of adjacent properties. We do have a number of letters in the file here against the project: one from Carolyn Yates, one from Lynn Normandia, one from Richard Byrd. So all those are part of the file. They have been read and reviewed by the Trustees. Is there anyone here wishing to speak regarding this Board of Trustees 12 August 17, 2022 application? MR. WOLPERT: For the applicant. Good evening, Members of the Board and staff. Welcome to the new members that I have not met before, but my name is Thomas Wolpert, I'm a civil engineer with Young & Young of Riverhead, and we are representing the applicant. With me this evening is my business partner Doug Adams. He's not only a licensed professional engineer but also a licensed professional geologist. The project architects are here, Ed Licalzi and his associate AJ Doucet, and they are from the CMA Group of Hauppauge. They designed the proposed house. Also present is the applicant and property owner, Tony and Markella Vournou, as well as their children. I think they are probably in a state of shock right now and would like an opportunity to address the Board at a later time this evening. Just a brief background and project description. This is, the subject property is a vacant lot with an area of 1.35 acres, a little over an acre and a third. It's located at 1925 North Sea Drive in Southold, bounded on the north by the Long Island Sound. The project generally consists of constructing a two-family house and garage together with the associated site improvements, including public water supply and sewage disposal system which would be the new nitrogen reducing IA/OWTS. The property is zoned residential R40 and with the required architectural drawings that we submitted and are in the file, the architect did a very comprehensive and detailed zoning analysis, showing that this is a no-variance plan with respect to the zoning requirements: Side yards, front yard, lot size, lot width, lot depth, lot coverage and building height and number of stories. We started this process on or about November 12th of 2021. The hearing sign was posted. The proposed structures were all staked in time for inspection by the Trustees' visit on August 9th. With regard to other permits and approvals, we do have a pending application with New York State DEC. They came back to us with some minor comments which we are in the process of addressing. We also have a pending application with the Suffolk County Health Department, and again, some minor comments that we are in the process of addressing. That completes my brief presentation. I hope I was within the five-minutes suggested limit, and at this time I would like Mr. Ed Licalzi to come up and present the architectural design so that the Board has a better understanding of what the Vournou's are trying to accomplish here. Thank you. (Trustee Krupski is now in attendance). MR. LICALZI: Good evening, Members of the Trustee Board. Ed Licalzi from HSR Engineering. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Excuse me, one second. Anybody wishing to Board of Trustees 13 August 17, 2022 speak just please spell your last name for the stenographer. MR. LICALZI: Sure. L-1-C-A-L-Z-I, 6500 Jericho Turnpike, Syosset, New York. - TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Sorry to interrupt you one more time. For the record, Trustee Krupski is now in attendance. MR. LICALZI: Members of the Board, if you would like, I could just put out a display of some of the renderings that we brought with us this evening. We thought might be helpful. Also if there are any comments for or against the application, it might be easier to represent that way. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: It might also be beneficial at some point to reverse the images so the audience can see as well. MR. LICALZI: Sure. This represents the actual front elevation proposed. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Sir, I'm sorry to interrupt you. Please address it to the Board. MR. LICALZI: Sorry. In our first rendering we are showing the house, obviously facing the south, but obviously viewing the Sound on the north side. The house is constructed with a living room, living area to the right, an entrance foyer here to the center, and a master bedroom located up a little higher on a mezzanine level to the far left. The balcony is shown here in the rendering as well. Front entrance, walkway and driveway, are shown also. This rendering is a view of the west, from the west. It shows the master bedroom area here. You can see the entrance driveway coming off of North Sea Drive, the entrance to the house, and a view of the catwalk in the distance that is proposed out toward the beach. The rear elevation of the house is basically glass throughout the whole rear elevation. You can see that. This is obviously facing the north. There is a swimming pool in the foreground, obviously cascading over the wall at the negative edge on the pool. You see the master bedroom here facing the water. Last would be the east view of the right-side elevation of the home, depicting the pool here, the Long Island Sound here, and the natural estuary that exists out in the beach area. The walkway entrance to the house. North Sea Drive here. That being all the renderings that we have for you this evening, I was wondering if you have any questions I maybe could answer. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: No. I appreciate the architectural design and everything. Our concerns are more environmental. So while I appreciate the effort that you put into this, we have some bigger issues concerning the environment, not necessarily the look of the house. So I don't know if Mr. Wolpert means to address that more so. First, in,proximity to the pier line, this whole structure is proposed seaward of the pier line and adjacent homes. As currently proposed, it will have an adverse.effect on the Board of Trustees 14 August 17, 2022 wetlands in the Town. It's located in a primary dune. It's also subject to flood damage, which can also affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of Southold Town. It's also.going to affect the esthetic value of the wetlands and, adjacent areas. It will affect the natural habitat of wildlife. So while I appreciate the effort on this, that is the bigger concern, and I believe that's also the concern of the majority of the people here in this audience, and that's what we as a Board need'to address, the environmental impact, where right now as proposed it will have a severe environmental impact, in our opinion. So you'll have some work to do on this application before we can move forward. MR. LICALZI: I would also like to make a comment, if you don't mind. We just learned of the term "pier line," something we didn't notice in the code at all, actually. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: It's actually in Chapter 275-11(a)(3). New and remodeled homes cannot be situated or modified such that they project closer to the wetland boundary than the mean seaward projection of homes in the general vicinity and on either side of the subject lot. MR. LICALZI: Okay, .thank you. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Thank you. At this time I'll ask Elizabeth to pull up a picture we .took today, a drone photo, that shows an aerial view of where the proposed home is to be located. So it's apparently very clear that it is seaward of all the adjacent houses in that neighborhood. Mr. Wolpert, seeing as everything that we just stated would affect the environment and all the reasons why this is in violation currently, would you wish to table to come up with a new plan to address all those concerns? MR. WOLPERT: Yes, certainly, we would want to consult with the client and his architect and come back with -- TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: So I appreciate that, because we have a packed house here tonight, and I'm sure they are all of the same mind, and I don't want to waste people's time about looking at this application that Will not be the final product which we vote on. If you want us to vote on what is before us right now MR. WOLPERT: We do not want you to vote. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: I did not think so. So, hearing that, and knowing that this will be tabled for another month, is there anyone else here wishing to speak regarding this application? And I'll preface that by saying what is in front of you and what has been proposed is not what we will ultimately vote on, so if your concerns are as it is.currently laid out, I would ask you to hold your comments until a later date when we do have a final set of plans that's ready for voting. MR. BOMBARA: Robert Bombara, I'm the owner of 1725 North Sea Drive, Southold, and I hate for these people to go through what Board of Trustees 15 August 17, 2022 I had to go through. Nine years to get the permit. But, as a result of that, it was clearly established, and you set a precedent. No part of this premises should exceed past what I was allowed to build. And that will stay in the line. And if it meets that criteria, I have no objection to what they build. But, they cannot exceed what we call, it's the DEC line or as Mr. Wolpert knows, because he was my surveyor at the time as well, The Herrmann line. Set by Robert Herrmann of the New York State DEC. Set it down, and we could not go one inch past that line. As long as this building is here -- MS. HULSE: Sir, the Trustees have already recognized that and made that part of the record. So you are reiterating what they already put on the record. But I understand your point tremendously. MR. BOMBARA: Thank you. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Thank you, sir. Is there anyone else who wishes to speak to this application? MR. VOURNOU: How are you doing, Board. Nice to meet you. My name is Tony Vournou, this is my wife Markella. This is not what I expected this evening. We are not here to disappoint any neighbors or anything like that. Our dream is to have a beach house, and we were very fortunate to pick up this property. I think the neighborhood is stellar. It's beautiful. We walked around and met some of the people here already, and at the time we walked around, we asked some questions, and I didn't see this coming at all this evening. So I'm a little upset, but, um, we are not looking to make enemies here. Once we do the drawings and do it, if we have to meet internally with the people, we have no problem. We are here to please. We don't want to build a house and have people throw rocks at our house. You know, we want our kids to play with the people's kids in the neighborhood, play with the grandchildren. And this house, we'll put a first-floor bedroom and an elevator in it because I plan to die looking at the Long Island Sound. So, that's the truth. We are not looking -- MS. HULSE: Sir, I know your neighbors are here and you wish to address them but this is really the Board's time. So if you wish to address the Board about anything in particular, I think your representative has already indicated he wishes to table it. So if you could address your comments specific to the Board's concerns. MR. VOURNOU: Yes. So my background, I went to school for architecture. I'm a contractor. I respect, obviously, the DEC and code. You know, I restored Theodore Roosevelt's house. I restored the old courthouse in Mineola. I'm very familiar with preserving land, protecting water, and trying not to change any of it. That's all. I don't know. Markella, do you want to say anything? My wife Markella grew up in Mattituck for the most part, every summer. So, I want to make my wife happy. Happy wife, happy life. We all know that. So. Board of Trustees 16 August 17, 2022 TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: As you stated, with familiarity with code, the two codes that pretty much control what this Board does are Chapter 275 and Chapter.111. So if you make yourself familiar with that, you can see where we stand and where the obstacles are. MR. VOURNOU: I understand. We'll address everything. And we'll get it done together. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Okay, thank you, sir. MR. VOURNOU: Thank you, very much. Nice meeting you all, Hope to see you next,time under better circumstances. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Yes, sir. MS. HARRISON: Good evening, Trustees, I'm Louise Harrison. I'm a conservation biologist. I work for Save The Sound but I'm representing myself tonight. I live in Peconic, and none of my comments have anything to do with the organization I work for. I have worked for the Department of State, so I'm familiar with coastal consistency. I agree with the LWRP review tonight, and I know that my comments need to be restricted to helpful suggestions, and not to reiterate what you have already discussed and have put before us this evening. It appears to me the applicant has put a great deal of resources into this application in the form of architecture and legal representation, but I would suggest some strong environmental credentials be added to their application. It's not sufficient in any application to be dismissive of the landscape and just describe it as grass and brush. Plants have names and species, and any credible application should be able to note not only the names of the species, but the kind of habitat that will be removed. And in a short, quick, eyeballing of the property yesterday, from the road, I was able to note post oak, black oak, eastern red cedar, bayberry, black cherry, .black locust, American beach grass and beach plum. And some of those, including the black cherry and eastern red cedar, are ancient organisms that have been on that site for probably a couple hundred years; stout and twisted and have moved with the wind in a very, very tough environment for plants to live. And what they constitute is a, as you well know, a dunal community. But they also have habitat connectivity to the habitat to the south, right across North Sea Drive, which as you all know is an inter-dunal swale that has its own habitat characteristics that are worth saving. And so, in favor of habitat contiguity, something to think about, where you have Long Island Sound crossing -- you have habitat that crosses from Long Island Sound, across a beach, across a primary dune, through a dune community, quick hop across North Sea Drive, which gets barely no traffic, and into an inter-dunal swale, that is something in and of itself worth preserving. So if this application has to go forward in some way and can be reduced in some manner of size, I would suggest that you ask for some preservation of the habitat corridor that reaches Board of Trustees 17 August 17, 2022 from Long Island Sound south to, into the inter-dunal swale, that could be preserved through construction and in perpetuity. Also, the amount of glass on this structure was alarming. Any amount of glass like that should include bird-friendly panes of glass so we can avoid bird strikes. And the last thing I want to say to you this evening, Trustees, is in spite of your tremendous workload, I hope you can start to take a proactive stance towards our remaining open space in Southold. And I began identifying areas that you can suggest for the Community Preservation Fund. This is the last access point through the dunes in that beach area, and it would have been perfect for the Town to own it. So please think about that going forward, maybe put a little extra time into identifying some more future open space for us. And I thank you for your time this evening. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Thank you. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I would say the Board does put quite a bit of extra time into trying to preserve the Town of Southold, and we, the Town in general is a little short on funds, so we are always looking for donations if you would like to help us out. But also to that point, I do think it would be most appropriate if you look at the satellite photos, if you go survey the site and the area, certainly this whole property would have to be a non-disturbance area outside of the building envelope, or even the building and then once the structure is done, close it in up into the house. It's a primary dune and the majority of the lot should remain one after construction. MR. LICALZI: Can I respond very quickly? TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: One moment. Sir? DR. BURRASCANO: Thank you, Trustees. I'm Dr. Joseph Burrascano, I'm a year-round, full-time resident of North Sea Drive and Southold. Basically I wrote up a whole summary using Town Code as a reference, and basically I'm not saying anything differently from what you said already, but in light of the environmental concerns, you know, part of the concern that I had, if a structure is to be built at all, is the entire structure as proposed is within Zone VE. VE, for those who don't know, is a flood zone. And the property is divided along parallel to North Sea Drive by a boundary between the A Zone and the V Zone. A Zone means possibility of damage from high water. V means damage including structural damage, from wave action. And we know that's your job. Paragraph 148, Section 2, about considering things that materials that might be swept onto other lands. In fact, the definition of a VE Zone is potential for structural damage due to wave action with the possibility of spreading debris along the beach into the water and into adjoining properties. So that we have already established. However, looking at the property, even if this were shrunk and put completely behind the V Line, into the A Zone, where the other houses are, by the Board of Trustees 18 August 17, 2022 way, you know, just looking at the. property, I'm seeing the entire structure in the VE Zone, all of the decking and stair access points, an inground pool and all the pool mechanicals, a full-size house with elevator, gazebo, storage area and boardwalk far in the VE Zone; a 1,200-gallon propane tank buried in the VE zone. I encountered five drywells in the VE zone. And in fact one half of the entire septic system is in the VE Zone. Now, of course maybe we can push this back into the A Zone, but in light of disturbing the environment, how can you put a pool, decking, house, sewer, buried tanks, drywells, a 4,000 square-foot driveway, and not disturb what is left? There's got to be some access that is totally undisturbed, and whether you say, well, I'm not going to put up fences, and by the way, on either side of the house is proposed concrete retaining walls, also in the VE Zone, and fill added also in the V zone, so -- TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: I apologize for interrupting you, sir, but, again, what you are commenting on will not be in the final product, so I ask you to reserve -- DR. BURRASCANO: Okay. Even if it's back in the A Zone, all this structure, it's going to be a massive damage to the environment, and to the natural nature of that piece of land. So I don't think anything should be built there. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Thank you. MS. VITTI: Good evening, Trustees. My name is'lrene Vitti. I'm the owner of 1930 North Sea Drive, which is the swale area that one of the speakers referred to, immediately adjacent but across. the street from the subject parcel. Thank you, for bringing this matter to the attention of the community, and for hearing so much as you-can tonight. I have had very little time to review this proposal. I only received it over the weekend, but here are my initial impressions. I find that the applicant's plans are quite honestly shocking. I inspected the'site yesterday. I can barely catch my breath. I'm very familiar with it because I've lived across-the street for 25 years. I've gazed on it, I've walked through it. I've observed the vegetation and the wildlife that is there. And I will not repeat what others have already said, but just to add to the concerns that I have. I think it was mentioned that there was a risk of contamination to the groundwater, but let me elaborate that when they eventually landscape whatever they build there, there will be discharge of herbicides, pesticides and,fertilizers, used to maintain the landscape. Now, I know that your.instructions or the instructions of the Zoning Board or the Building Department are not to do that, but we all know that it happens nevertheless. We have some endangered, threatened and protected species that live there. I have seen them. Regularly. I'll just name them: Piping Plovers; Eastern Box Turtles and Red Foxes. The likelihood of them returning after that site is disturbed, there is none. They will not come back. I have seen it in parcel after Board of Trustees 19 August 17, 2022 parcel that has been developed on this stretch of waterfront. The existing vegetation, somebody spoke to quite well, but let me add to that, there are native grasses, beach plums, which also native, and roses. Some.of which are native, as you know. And then I think the thing that impacts all of us, whether we live there or not, is that it will result in loss of open space. A beautiful vista. Stunning vista. And it will add to the blight that we are now facing of light pollution by putting another structure along that strand of beach: So I only had a short time, as I said. I would like permission to submit further written comments, whether to this meeting or further meeting, but I would like to introduce Ms. Martha Reichert. She.is a land use expert who I engaged only .yesterday because I had so little time, but I was so deeply concerned that I thought it was worth well to have an expert speak. And she will further elaborate. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Just again, to reiterate, we have spoken about the environmental impacts. We have instructed the applicant that they have a lot of homework to do. So what we are commenting on at this point is premature because they definitely have to go back to the drawing board to address the comments that everybody has already spoken about, as well as-the Board. So -= MS. VITTI: Well, I assure you she will be brief and it's merely to lay a foundation as well. MS. REICHERT: Thankyou, Members of the Board. My name is Martha Reichert, I'm with the law firm of Twomey Latham, located at 33 West Second Street, Riverhead. I'll keep my comments very brief because I understand this won't be the application that will be decided upon. But I think in addition to concurring with the findings that this is not consistent with the LWRP, it's not consistent with the standards for the issuance of a permit under Chapters 111 and 275. One of the elements of the application that I didn't really see addressed in any of the reports, but I think is important for this Board to discuss and for the applicant to consider as it revises its plans,r is the amount of fill that was proposed. One of the drawings shows the limit of the fill extending very far seaward and so the applicant has proposed, they've represented on the application that they are going to reuse fill from excavated parts of the property during construction, but I still think that the impact of (a), mining, or digging nearly 700 cubic yards of primary dune sand is concerning, and then redistributing it across the property on an area as widespread as they are currently depicting also has serious environmental concerns. So I would hope that the applicant can find a way to minimize that site disturbance, especially to the primary dune. And I'll limit my comments just to that for right now. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Thank you. Before we go in, Mr. Wolpert, I think potentially it would be a good idea to schedule a - pre-submission for our next field inspection so we can address. Board of Trustees 20 August 17, 2022 the concerns that the Board has as well as the public has brought up out in the field and meet in the field. MS. VOURNOU: Hi. Markella Vournou. I'm sorry, I was a little shell-shocked when I came in and my husband came in. As he said, my grandfather built a house in Mattituck in 1965. 1 have been summering here my whole life. I love the north fork. I want to preserve the integrity of the north fork. And I understand my neighbors have environmental concerns, but I also realize that when they built their homes that some trees had to be plucked, birds were relocated. Even, you know, birds who were endangered. And we deserve to be here as much as anybody else. We love nature, and if we didn't, we wouldn't be spending all these resources here in the north fork. We would be in Manhattan or some other busy city. We want to be here because we love the north fork, we love what it represents. And we are just good, family people, we are not trying to step on anybody's feathers. We don't, you know, want to build this crazy monstrosity to stress people out and uproot the values of the community. I just wanted to say that. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Thank you. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Thank you. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY:_Thank you. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: As we mentioned, we'll meet with your expediter out in the field for a pre-submission. You guys are more than welcome to be there as well to hear our concerns and discuss. MR. MASTRO: Louis Mastro. MS. MASTRO: Elizabeth Mastro. MR. MASTRO: We live at 2025 North Sea Drive. MS. MASTRO: We are neighbors to them. MR. MASTRO: We are on the east end border of the project. I just want to point out, make a note about the history of the area. We have been coming out since 1961, and 20 years ago we had such bad erosion along North Sea Drive. It was created by the engineers, army engineers, saying it was the jetty that was causing it. And they wanted to take half of it away so the migrating sand would come down. 20 years ago we had such bad erosion along all North Sea Drive. People were putting boulders out, putting plants in, and trying to stop this nature from just taking away the property. Now you look.at the surveys, it's.two-years old. The high tide mark looks good, 300 feet from the street. But it was not that. I used to be able to, from the street, throw a rock into the water. That's how close the water was 20 years ago. And a storm, a hurricane, nor'easter could take that away. And also I want to point out that being so familiar with the area, there is a berm in the front and then the property, the sand goes down. So the elevation of sand is much lower than it was 20 years ago.,Much lower. The storms come over the berm and then floods out there and it kills the sea grass when that happens. Board of Trustees 21 August 17, 2022 So I know things change and erosion happens, but I think it's all, even in your interest, to -- TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: You need to address the Board, please. MS. MASTRO: Our concern is we have the little house right there, and the way this house is going to come up, we are going to see nothing but a house. I'm sorry -- TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Ma'am, you need to address the Board. MS. HULSE: Your comments have to be addressed only to the Board. It can't be back out to the audience. One person has to speak at a time because the stenographer is taking the Minutes. So one or the other is fine. So if you can continue. . MS. MASTRO: So the only concern that we have, we met the owners, I mean, they can build whatever they want. They purchased the property, it was for'sale for everyone to buy. They bought it and of course they are going through hell. And we wish them luck and I hope they get a house. But how big of a scale, we really don't mind, as long as it's not past our property. Because in the bedroom the only thing we are going to see is a wall of a house and nothing else. That's the only thing. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Thank you. That's what we already discussed with the applicant. Thank you. MS. MASTRO: Because we are right next door. Thank you. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Is there anyone else wishing to speak regarding this application? MR. VERNI: Michael Verni. I'm at 2125 North Sea Drive, two houses away from the applicant's property. Um, basically the same thing. You know, I'm a more visceral person. Don't ask for intellect from this body. But we've been coming out here to that particular house since 1964, since I was a little kid. I'm 66-years old now. And I purchased my house 30 years ago from my friend who's the guitar player for Cindi Lauper, we played in the music business together. And I had the opportunity to purchase it as a vacation home. And I'm blessed to now be semi-retired and living here full-time. However, I believe it's very possible that due to a misunderstanding on either the architect's part or whatever, where the house is placed is more of a problem than anything else. Again, size, listen, you could build the Taj Mahal,-shoot for the moon, get what you can, I get it. But when I can't even put a kiddy pool in for my six-year old son on the side of my house because the DEC line is right behind my house, and I can't put anything back there. This cannot stand. Because I can't put up a shed, I can't put up anything. Even to hold my kid's toys. My kid's toys are all outside. It just can't stand. However, like I said, I believe that if the applicant was to move the proposed building back or possibly scale it down, I don't think we would have a problem. As a matter of fact, I love ultra-modern. Most people don't. I just don't have the money. to build it. So have at it, bring all the specs up, everything would be beautiful. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Thank you, sir. Board of Trustees 22 August 17, 2022 TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Thank you. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Anyone else here wish to speak regarding this application? (No response). TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Any other questions or comments from the Board? (Negative response). TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Hearing none, I make a motion to table this application. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I recuse myself from the vote. (Trustees Goldsmith, Sepenoski, Gillooly and Peeples, vote aye) (Trustee Krupski, recused). TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: . As everyone leaves, if you can understand, we have another ten public hearings, so if you can exit the building before conversing with your neighbors, we would appreciate it.'Thank you. MS. HULSE: Make a note that Trustee Krupski requested to recuse himself because he was not present for the entire meeting. WETLAND PERMITS: TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Number one under Wetland Permits, Young & Young on behalf of KATHLEEN & LYLE GIRANDOLA requests a Wetland Permit to demolish and remove existing 1-1/2 story dwelling, remove a portion of existing driveway, and abandon existing sanitary system; construct a new two-story dwelling with a 1,577sq.ft. footprint, a 144sq.ft. front porch, a 344sq.ft. covered rear patio, and a 40sq.ft rear balcony; renovate existing 442sq.ft garage; remove a portion of existing driveway for a 3,240sq.ft. driveway; abandon or remove existing cesspool and install a new IA/OWTS system consisting of one (1) 600 gallon treatment unit and two (2) sanitary leaching pools; install underground electric service and public water service; install gutter to leaders to drywells to contain roof and driveway runoff. Located: ,3040 Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel. SCTM# 1000-128-6-10 The Trustees most recently visited the site on 8/9/22, and the notes from that inspection read: Need to show adjacent houses for pier line. The LWRP found the application to be consistent, and noted it is recommended the setback from the structure to the bulkhead be shown. Note that the property would be most impacted by Category 4 hurricanes. The Conservation Advisory Council resolved to support the application. There seems to-be some inconsistency with the language here of support. It says the Conservation Advisory Council does not support the application because the proposed setbacks are not compliant with Chapter 275 of the Town Code, and there is room to move the structures further landward. Board of Trustees 23 August 17, 2022 The Trustees are in.receipt of new plans stamped August 17th, 2022, which address both Conservation Advisory Council and LWRP concerns. Is there anyone here who wishes to speak regarding this application? MR. WOLPERT: Thomas Wolpert, Engineer with Young & Young of Riverhead, representing the applicant Lyle and Kathleen Girandola, who are also here tonight. And if there are any questions of them, I'm sure that would be happy to get up and speak. In way of the project background and description, the subject property is a 26,710 square-foot parcel with an existing one-and-one-half story frame house and a garage. Detached. garage. The project generally consists of demolishing the existing one-and-one-half story house and replacing it not in the same footprint but actually further landward than the existing footprint, with a two-story house. We initiated this application on or about November 15th of 2021, and as the Trustee stated, we did deliver two revised building permit surveys which showed the relocation of the proposed two-story frame house to respect the pier line. And as far as other permits and approvals, we were issued a New York State DEC tidal wetlands, well, I'm sorry, letter of no jurisdiction from the Tidal Wetlands Act, because all of the proposed activities were landward of the ten-foot elevation contour. Part of this process involved an application and approval from the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals for side yard setbacks. I think we are actually improving the side yard setbacks over the existing structure. We do have a pending application with the Suffolk County Department of Health, and of course the proposed method of water supply is by connection to the existing Suffolk County Water Authority main on Peconic Bay Boulevard. And we are proposing the new Innovative Alternative Onsite Wastewater Treatment System. So that completes my five-minute presentation, and anyone who has any questions of either me or the owner/applicant, we would be happy to accept. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Thank you. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Anyone else wish to speak regarding this application? (Negative response). Any questions or comments from the Board? (Negative response). Hearing none, I make a motion to close this hearing. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: I'll make a motion to approve this application with new plans stamped August 17th, 2022. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Second. Board of Trustees 24 August 17, 2022 TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Number 2, Young &Young on behalf of STEPHEN & JACQUELINE DUBON requests a Wetland Permit for the existing 1,118sq.ft. one-.story dwelling and for the demolition and removal of certain existing structures (project meets Town Code definition of demolition), within and outside of the existing dwelling to facilitate construction of the proposed additions and alterations consisting of a proposed 45sq.ft. addition to northeast corner, and a 90sq.ft. addition to southeast corner for a 1,,195sq.ft. total footprint after additions; construct a 1,195sq.ft. second story addition; a 70sq.ft. second-story balcony; replace and expand existing easterly.deck with a 320sq.ft. deck with 69sq.ft. of deck stairs to ground; replace and expand existing porch with a 40sq.ft. porch and 20sq.ft. porch stairs to ground; install one (1) new drywell for roof runoff; abandon two (2) existing cesspools and install a new IA/OWTS system consisting of one (1) 500-gallon treatment unit and 46 linear feet of graveless absorption trenches and for the existing 84sq.ft. shed. Located: 5605 Stillwater Avenue, Cutchogue. SCTM# 1000-137-4-3.2 The LWRP reviewed this application and found it to be consistent. They did note to clarify the use and ownership of the right-of-way where the sanitary system and wall are proposed. The right-of-way connects to Stillwater Road. The Trustees most recently visited the site on August 9th, noting that we would like to see the septic and wall outside of wetland boundary, and that it needs to have a non-turf buffer added to the project. Is there anyone here wishing to speak regarding this application? MR. WOLPERT: Yes. Thomas Wolpert, with Young & Young of Riverhead, representing the applicant Stephen Dubon and Jacqueline Dubon, who are also here. And again, I'm sure they would be happy to answer any questions that the Board may have. The subject property is an 11,320 square-foot parcel on Stillwater Avenue. It's bounded on the south by Indian Creek, and the project generally consists of adding two small first-floor additions and a second story to the existing one-story house. The New York State DEC issued a tidal wetlands permit for this project on May 23rd of this year. We had a pending application with the Suffolk County Health Department for construction of water and sewer. Water will be by way of connection to the existing Suffolk County Water Authority main on Stillwater Avenue, and the sewage disposal,will bean IA/OWTS.. That's all I have. . I don't quite understand the concerns of the Board with regard to placement of the small stone retaining wall and leaching trenches within the wetland boundary because according Board of Trustees 25 August 17, 2022 to our survey the wetland boundary is at least 60 or 70 feet I'll say east of--sorry, I get my directions mixed up. At least 60 to 70 feet away from the end of those two proposed leaching trenches. So I don't quite understand that. There is an overgrown area that when we staked the proposed sanitary leaching trench for inspection by the Trustees, it did appear in some of the overgrown area, but we did not identify that as a wetland. So I'm not sure how we can resolve that difference of opinion. And I'm open to suggestions. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Thank you. Any comments from the Board? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Well, I have two questions. One would be a concern with the location of the wetland. And the other question, which I'll ask first, is I believe that area to be a right-of-way for the neighborhood, and this seems to cross over the right-of-way. So could you speak to that first? MR. WOLPERT: Yes. The right-of-way that we show on the building permit survey, it does appear that the leaching trenches and the future expansion reserve area are within that right-of-way, however, I'm not sure where the concern is because those are underground structures and would not impede the flow of the pedestrian traffic. Even if this area were cleared. But as I understand it, and the Dubon's could probably speak to that better than me, I believe they walk across their property now, the people that want to get to the water. So they are not even traversing that right-of-way. But again, the proposed structures are underground, nobody would even know they are there. So I'm not sure there is any restriction on placing underground structures in that right-of-way. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: What about the retaining wall? MR. WOLPERT: The retaining wall is just a very small stone retaining wall to hold back some of the fill so that we can achieve compliance with Health Department. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Just for clarification, how high is a "small retaining wall,"for the record? MR. WOLPERT: One to two foot. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: One to two feet? MR.-WOLPERT: Yes. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Just at a glance, someone trying to traverse down there with a Sunfish or a kayak or a paddle board is going to have a problem with a one to two-foot wall on the right-of-way. MR. WOLPERT: The issues that we had in laying out this sanitary design, we are extremely limited by the lot. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I understand that. MR. WOLPERT: And the adjacent Eugene Creek, in fact we sought and received a variance from the DEC to place the structures where we have them. So I just don't see room elsewhere on the site where we are retaining the existing footprint of the house so we don't have the opportunity to move the house. So we are very limited as to where we can place these leaching trenches. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: So one of the problems for us is that everyone that has legal access to that right-of-way would have to be on Board,of Trustees 26 August 17, 2022 board with the project. We can't approve something in a right-of-way without the participation of all the residents. MR. WOLPERT: What is the mechanism for obtaining that authorization? MS. HULSE: You can get it in writing from them. They.can submit that to the Board directly or you can submit it yourself, but there has to be some authorization. MR. WOLPERT: Who has a list of the -- TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I certainly don't. MR. DUBON: We can get them. MR. WOLPERT: Okay. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: And then my second question is, I'm very familiar with this neighborhood, and I would dispute that wetland line. Up until about a year or two ago there's quite a bit of Baccharis, which I would say would indicate a high tide, you know, an upland marsh area. l would like to see, and I understand this is a difficult lot. I understand that it is hard to place material because it is small and, but I would appreciate it being pulled out of that low-lying area, if possible. MR. WOLPERT: The leaching trenches? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Yes, that's correct. MR. WOLPERT: Do you have a suggestion on where we might place them? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I understand it's a difficult lot. I .unfortunately don't. But-- TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: I do think that there is an opportunity maybe to turn it and to go underneath the deck expansion that is planned or in the front yard. I mean, we do appreciate the IA system and we, you know, like that you are doing that, and we understand -- MR. WOLPERT: I appreciate your appreciation. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: But, yes. Unfortunately -- MR. WOLPERT: The Health Department would never allow us to put leaching trenches under a deck. So this is literally what we thought of was the optimum spot for it, but maybe, Trustee Krupski, we could somehow reconcile the actual wetland boundary a little bit better. (.don't know how quite to do that unless we hire an environmental consultant. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Is there anyone else here wishing to speak regarding this application? MR. WOLPERT: This is my business partner Doug Adams, he's a licensed professional engineer and also a professional geologist MR. ADAMS: Doug Adams, Young &Young. Just to address a couple of comments you made. We are looking to the right-of-way and what limitations are set by, you know, the stuff as proposed that we have here, we'll see what's in the title of the property. So we'll find out what the exact language is in the deed regarding this right-of-way and also find out who else has rights to that right-of-way. Regarding the wall, the short wall that we have there, it Board of Trustees 27 August 17, 2022 is only on the one half of the right-of-way that this property is encumbered by, and it doesn't cross,the whole thing. So there would be ways to direct pedestrian traffic around it, or some sort of similar type of masonry step to get up it, to just walk straight across it. I just wanted to deliver that note about how we can traverse this impediment. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Thank you. MR. ADAMS: And also, I'm sorry, on the delineation of the Young & Young tidal wetland as you, it's kind of a tricky, subjective thing. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I can appreciate that. MR. ADAMS: And I was actually there today and even though it was high tide in the water; it was past where we delineate it, but it's also if you look at the tide charts and the history of the tide tables, it's an exceptionally high tide, it happens to be today for whatever reason. But the vegetation, as you mentioned, is different above where we have'it. So I think we have to coordinate on how we can get a better line put in. But I don't believe at the end of the one leaching field that we have there is a couple feet into that brush that is actually wetland, so. But we can look at reconfiguring the stuff to get it a little further away`as we can, considering it's a bad kind of geometric shape and get them in as well, and doing an IA system, so we did note that the leach agent that is in those is dramatically less than a regular system, so. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Thank you. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Thank you. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Thank you. Any other questions or comments? MR. DUBON: Hi. Stephen Dubon. I'm the applicant. I just wanted. to address the actual right-of-way. I don't believe any part of that is on my property. I believe it's all north of the property through that brush area, and we just allowed for, because we are north forkers for 20-something years, my brother owned the property, and we have.been there for six years, people to traverse through our yard.And we'll allow that forever, but if, you know, you look at some of the descriptions that this came from Southold Town, so the right-of-way is well north of the property line. So it's not actually just where it's mowed on my lawn. It's inside the brush, but nobody uses it. Nobody is going to maintain that. So we allow people to walk through the property. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Thank you. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Thank you. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Thank you. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Any other questions or comments from the Board? (No response). Hearing none, I make a motion to table this application pending further review. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). Board of Trustees 28 August 17, 2022 MR. WOLPERT: Thank you, have a good night. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Number 3, East End Pool King on behalf of KIERAN COLLINGS requests a Wetland Permit to install a proposed 16'x32' vinyl swimming pool with approximately 1,300sq.ft. at grade patio; install pool enclosure fencing; install a drywell for pool waste water; and install a pool equipment area. Located: 3960 Ole Jule Lane, Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-122-4-26.1 The Trustees recently visited this site back on May 10th of 2022, and noted that comments from the prior month are still applicable; to adjust the pool to maximize the distance from the wetlands. We did receive new plans stamped and dated August 10th of 2022, that show a reduced-size swimming pool as noted by a letter here from East End Pool King that decreased the size of the pool to 16'x30' from the original 16'x32', and they shortened the patio between the house and the pool by five feet, changing it from 21' to 16'. The LWRP finds this application consistent. And the Conservation Advisory Council resolved to not support the application for the installation of the pool as submitted. Is there anyone here wishing to speak in regard to this application? (Negative response). I would like to just note that during our work session and review of the updated plans, that while there is a ten-foot non-turf buffer that has been added to a certain portion of the landward side of the timber bulkhead, we would like to request that that ten-foot non-turf buffer follows the contour of the timber bulkhead so that it then spans from the property line to the property line on each side. Are there any other comments from the Board? (Negative response). Hearing none, I make a motion to close this hearing. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE PEEPLES: I make a motion to approve this application with the condition that the ten-foot non-turf buffer is extended the entire length from property line to property line, and it follows the contour of the timber bulkhead. And we would need this in receipt of an updated plan showing this description. That is any motion. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Number 4, JOSEPH F. BARSZCZEWSKI, JR. requests a Wetland Permit for the as-built clearing; install a 3 foot wide by 1 foot high soil berm; and plant 12 Eastern Red Board of Trustees 29 August 17, 2022 Cedars (3" caliper), and 12 Baccharis Halimifolia bushes. Located: 110 Lawrence Lane, Greenport. SCTM# 1000-53-2-7 The LWRP found this to be consistent. A couple of notes. This is a continuation of a permit on a property we issued in 2020. The new work is minor and is recommended at consistent. The Conservation Advisory Council resolved to support this application. The Trustees conducted an inhouse review August 9th. We reviewed new plans at work session. The new plans are the same as the old plans for the permit that had since expired, so this is just a continuation. Is there anyone here wishing to speak regarding this application? (Negative response). , Any questions or comments from the Board? (Negative response). Hearing none, I make a motion to close this hearing. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: I make a motion to approve this application as submitted. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Number 5, JOSEPH F. & LINDA SCIOTTO requests a Wetland Permit for the existing 2,011 sq.ft. two-story dwelling with a 400sq.ft. second floor balcony, a 7'x24' west side porch, a 3'4"x10' stoop on seaward side, an existing 6'8"x6'7" outdoor shower, and an existing 6'x7'4" Jacuzzi; remove existing garage and shed; construct a new 1,166sq.ft. two-story addition onto the landward side of existing dwelling on top of a 4" reinforced concrete foundation slab with a proposed one-story 10'x12' shed attached to landward side of addition; the existing 14'8"x15'4" front porch to be expanded an additional 8'2"'x10' to connect to new addition; and to install gutters to leaders to drywells for the addition. Located: 8380 Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel. SCTM# 1000-126-11-20 The.LWRP coordinator found this to be inconsistent. The structures were constructed without obtaining a wetland permit. The Conservation Advisory Council resolved to support the application, however, questions the materials being used for the driveway. Also concerned with the removal of established oak and pine trees. The Board is also in receipt of a letter from the neighbor dated received today, August 17th. The project appears to be an over-intensive use for such a small-lot that already has a large house, large inground pool, hardened deck and various other improvements. This proposal,doubles the size of the existing, which requires cutting down countless trees on the lot along the public way with unknown ecological impact. Board of Trustees 30 August 17, 2022 Further, the application is essentially building an entirely new dwelling. What is described as garage project is more accurately described as a second home on the property, with a height of 23.5 square-feet. I respectfully request an adjournment of this hearing. And that is Kathleen Pillai. There is another one, there was a delay in the noticing, so they are asking for an adjournment (perusing). The Trustees visited the property on the 9th of August and noted that it was a straightforward application. Is there anyone here that wishes to speak regarding the application? MR. CERVON: Larry Cervon, 8460 Peconic Bay Boulevard, directly east of the proposed property. I'm not sure I have any specific objections, I'm just concerned with the height of the structure, and I'm not sure if that's this group or the Planning Board. We have a structure on the other side of us that is towering, so I was just concerned with the size of this structure. And the other note is just there is no mention of the removal of any additional trees between our property and theirs. I just want to make sure that doesn't happen. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Thank you. Is there anyone else wishing to speak regarding this application or additional comments from the Board? MR. SCIOTTO: Good evening, Members of the Board, my name is Joseph Sciotto. This is my wife Linda. As far as I know, the new addition is actually further away from the property line of said concern than the existing garage that will be demolished. And it is to my knowledge that there will be no further trees that will need to be removed. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: My only question about the trees for that was I believe at our site.visit, and I think in discussions with your, wife, are you moving the driveway over and kind of taking out all those trees there? MR. SCOTT: Well, we were hoping to have the driveway moved further to the west side of the property, which might require the need to have removal of some trees. If that's an issue, we would be more than happy to leave the driveway where it is. We are not looking to cause any problems here. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Okay, so this Board does have a practice of trying to protect native trees and vegetation. MR. SCIOTTO: Sure. I understand. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: For myself, I think if you do end up taking down trees for the driveway, I would be comfortable with something along the lines of a one-for-one replacement with native species. So if you do move it over, maybe relocate or replant some new native trees. Would that be something you would be amenable to? MR. SCIOTTO: Sure, absolutely. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Thank you. Are there any additional comments Board of Trustees 31 August 17, 2022 from the Board or anyone else from the public that wishes to speak? (No response). Hearing no further comments, I'll make a motion to close the hearing. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I make motion to approve the application with the stipulation any trees that are removed during construction are replaced on a one-to-one replacement with native species, and by granting this permit will thereby be bringing this into consistency with the LWRP coordinator. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Second. All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Number 6, Cole Environmental Consulting on behalf of GERARD & KAREN DIFFLEY requests a Wetland Permit to demolish existing dwelling, deck, driveway and curb; construct a new±48'6" x±61'2" two-story irregular shaped dwelling (±2,354sq.ft.) with a full basement (±2,354sq.ft.); remove ±387 cubic yards of soil for the full basement; construct a ±24' x ±5' front porch; a ±21' x ±5' rear porch; a ±4' x±5' entry stoop on east side; install a ±40' x ±35' irregular shaped stone patio with a ±15' x 15' shade porch; install a ±30' x±14' in-ground swimming pool with a max depth of±7'; proposed patio, shade porch and pool to be on-grade; install a drywell for pool discharge; install a pool enclosure fencing; install a ±4' x±4' outdoor shower; remove ±80 cubic yards of soil for pool excavation; install a pervious semi-circle driveway landward of dwelling; existing septic system to be abandoned (system to be pumped clean and filled with clean sand from upland source); and the installation of a new I/A OWTS system landward of dwelling; there is no proposed grade change. Located: 1050 Lupton Point Road, Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-115-11-14 The Trustees most recently visited the site on 8/9/22. Notes from that site inspection read as follows: Pool, too close to bank. Question location of top of bank. Should be more landward. Whole house landward. Need non-turf vegetated buffer from top of bank. And a tree removal, question mark. The LWRP found this application to be consistent with its policies, and makes three recommendations. One, regarding the IA/OWTS system. Second, consider requiring vegetated non-turf buffer to mitigate the shift of the structure seaward. Retain trees and existing vegetation within the buffer. And a question, where will the outside shower drain be. The Conservation Advisory Council resolved not to support the application. And the reason it does not support is due to the inadequate setbacks of the proposed swimming pool and dwelling. The proposed structures are too close to the wetland boundary and not in compliance with the LWRP. We are in receipt of surveys stamped June 15th, 2022, and Board of Trustees 32 August 17, 2022 plans for the proposed project stamped August 1 st, 2022. Is there anyone here who wishes to speak regarding the application? MR. COLE: Good evening. Chris Cole, Cole Environmental Services for Jerry Diffley, homeowner and applicant. In terms of setbacks to the top of the bluff, or top of the bank, we are 55 feet from the proposed pool, so meeting the setback requirements. The only setback requirement that we don't meet is for the house to the top of the bank. And we are well behind the house pier line of the adjacent corners of every other house on the street. And in terms of non-turf buffer, we would be open to putting one in. If there are any other questions, I'm here to answer them, and the homeowner is here as well. TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Just one question was, it does appear that the highest point of the property actually extends through the pool. So that would be the top of the bank. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Mr. Cole, can you comment on something? We have plans stamped received August 1st, 2022, and on this set it's showing 32 feet from the pool to what you are considering the top of the slope. MR. COLE: That's 32 feet to the top of the slope, but it's well over 55 feet to the wetland line. So we are considering the wetland line to be totally separate from the top of the slope. Even though I know the Board's jurisdiction goes from the top of slope. But the setbacks go through the wetlands as far as we are understanding. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: The bank. That's correct. MR. COLE: This is a bank. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I think the Board's point with that is that even though this is legally a bank, we are getting very close to a bluff, by legal definition. And while the code speaks to banks, I think it mainly is trying to talk about smaller banks, and if this can be maybe tucked in or downsized a little bit, I think it would be, I mean, this is just one Trustee's opinion, it would be a better fit for that area. Because it is pretty steep there, as you know. MR. COLE: Yes. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: And can you speak to, on this plan, it looks like we have a,14-foot contour elevation at the top of the slope but it also goes up to 16 and.18. So how did we come up with a 14 being the top of the slope? MR. COLE: That is something the surveyor put on. I would need call him. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Okay. Because obviously where the proposed pool is at 18 foot elevation, it's sloping down: MR. COLE: It does continue to slope off, but that is basically where the steepness kind of levels off and slowly goes up to the 18-foot contour. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: And then speaking of that. I think the 14-foot contour line we have just been speaking.about, I believe that's Board of Trustees 33 August 17, 2022 where you have the pool fence, the compliant pool fence. MR. COLE: Yes. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: And it seems that if that in fact is what you are defining as the top of the bank, that maybe that should be pushed back landward a little bit as well so that it's not quite so precipitous there. So I think if you can address that. And then the other comment I have, I started counting the number of trees that were being removed on the property, and every time I counted, I then saw one more, and then one more, and then one more, and then one more. They kept appearing because they are layered with the rest of the plans. So, you know, as was mentioned by Trustee Krupski in a previous application, we do look favorably upon trying to replace the trees that are removed. And, I mean, this site is beautiful, obviously we visited last week in terms of the number of mature trees that are there. And thank you for noting the caliper of them, but they go up to, I think one goes up to 30 or 36 inches. So just addressing that would be helpful as well. MR. COLE: Yes, I think we would be open to replacing on a one-to-one ratio with native trees. And if you do look at the plans, my client is intending.to keep as many as possible. My client does like the wooded aspect of it. He's taking down the ones that are directly in conflict with the construction. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: And I,think if, you know, some of the comments in terms of moving back the`house, moving back some of this structure that is so close to wherever we are defining the slope of this bank, that would save some of those trees. MR. COLE: If it's all right, the homeowner is here. MR. DIFFLEY: Thank you, for your consideration. Gerard Diffley. We currently live on Lupton Point, We lived on Lupton Point for over 30 years, so we know the beauty of it. It's an unusual piece of land, as I think you saw on your site Visit, so I know that the contour is a little unique. We are happy to preserve as many trees as we can and replace the ones that are one-to-one. Because of that slope, however, there is not a lot of land to build, and as Mr. Cole said, you know, we are well behind the lines of our neighbors. So we just ask for consideration there. Thank you. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Thank you. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: So hearing our concerns, the trees, and our concerns with the pool and proximity to the wetlands, would you be willing to work with the plans to shift the pool landward? ` MR. DIFFLEY: To the extent that we can; absolutely. We don't need a huge pool. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Okay, I see you have some space for the patio and the size of the pool, and, as you said, the structure is behind the pier line. So is there anyone else here wishing to speak to this application? (Negative response). Anyone on the Board wishing to comment? TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Just to reiterate Trustee Peeples' point that also the fence should be moved from there. Board of Trustees 34 August 17, 2022 TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Hearing no further comments, I make motion to table this application. MR. COLE: Thank you. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: Number 7, North Fork Woodworks on behalf of DKJK FAMILY TRUST requests a Wetland Permit to construct an 852sq.ft. attached garage with a second floor recreational/media room onto the landward side of existing permitted dwelling. Located: 880 Deep Hole Drive, Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-115-12-13 The LWRP reviewed this application and found it to be consistent. And the CAC reviewed and resolved to support this application, with one note: If a bathroom is being installed as part of the project, the Conservation Advisory Council recommends an IA septic system. The Trustees most recently visited the site on August 9th, noting that the project seemed straightforward. Is there anyone here wishing to speak regarding this application? (No response). Any questions or comments from the Board? (Negative response). Hearing none, I'll make a motion to close this hearing. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE GILLOOLY: I make a motion to approve this application with the plans stamped received in our office July 1st, 2022. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Number 8, Suffolk Environmental Consulting on behalf of CHARLES SNYDER requests a Wetland Permit to remove and replace in place approximately 114 linear feet of existing bulkheading and ±11'4" long return using vinyl sheathing; and to reconstruct the existing 441.9sq.ft. deck in-kind and in-place located along the seaward side of existing dwelling. Located: 704 Wiggins Lane, Greenport. SCTM# 1000-35-4-28.24 The Trustees most recently visited the site on August 9th and noted that the application is straightforward. The LWRP found that this is exempt from their review. And the Conservation Advisory Council resolved to support the application of Charles Snyder. Is there anyone here who wishes to speak regarding this application? MR. ANDERSON: Rob Anderson, Suffolk Environmental Consulting on behalf of the applicant to answer any questions the Board may have. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Thank you.-I'll just note here as well that we have Board of Trustees 35 August 17, 2022 a survey that was stamped dated August 10th on the record as well -- MR. ANDERSON: Yes, that is correct. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: (Continuing) that includes a non-turf buffer. MR. ANDERSON: Yes, ma'am. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Does anyone else wish to speak? (No response). Any other questions or comments from the Board? (Negative response). Hearing none, I make a motion to close the hearing. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE PEEPLES: I make a motion to approve this application with the most recent plans stamped dated August 10th, 2022. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Number 9, Michael Kimack on behalf of GEROSA FAMILY TRUST requests a Wetland Permit to remove existing set of bluff stairs, benches and shed (shed not to be replaced), and construct a new set of bluff stairs with railings consisting of a 4'x6' (24sq.ft.) top landing to 4'x10' (40sq.ft.) stairs to a 4'x6' (24sq.ft.) middle landing to 4'x13.1' (52.4sq.ft.) stairs to a 4'x6' (24sq.ft.) lower landing with an 8'x 30" x 30" storage bin cantilevered off side of landing to 4x9.25' (37sq.ft.) stairs to ground; total'of landings, staircases and storage bin to be 221.4sq.ft.; maximum disturbance to be 2' on either side of bluff stairs; replant disturbed areas and area of removed staircase with American Beach Grass at 12" on center and/or indigenous vegetation with two (2) layers of burlap (o/e) fastened. Located: 315 Aquaview Avenue, East Marion. SCTM# 1000-21-2-3 The LWRP found this to be inconsistent. The inconsistency is the Aquaview Property Association's common beach access is located just to the east of the parcel. These areas were designed to create common beach access to minimize beach stairs from each parcel. The Conservation Advisory Council resolved to support the application with retractable steps to the base of the staircase. Trustees conducted a field inspection August 9th, 2022, noting that staircase project seemed straightforward, discussed a buffer at the top of bluff and the review of the lower platform dimensions. We did receive stamped survey, stamped received in the Trustees office August 16th, 2022, that do show a ten-foot, non-turf buffer at top of the bluff. Is there anyone here wishing to speak regarding this application? MR. KIMACK: Mike Kimack, on behalf of the applicant. The existing staircase from the original plan, or from the Board of Trustees 36 August 17, 2022 original survey, shows that it's been in its place since at least 1969. It has varied, basically, on that particular one. In the design layout that I did, I wanted to show, we are putting it in the same location it is, because that's the only location it can go in. Simply because of all those heavy stones and rocks, it has to start at the_same location, and pretty much end at the same location. You can see, I dotted in the existing staircase that is being removed around the one that is being put in its place, and we are, I think perhaps maybe three feet, a little bit more seaward with the new one only because I had to raise it in order to get the four-foot clearance for the DEC's requirements. If you remember, the original staircase is pretty much on grade. So I moved the landing out about three or four--four or five feet over the top of the bluff in order to begin the staircase going down in order to obtain that four foot under the runners. And that's why it ended up to'be the extra three feet, a little more seaward than the original one is right now. The platforms are all 4x6. We are taking the shed out, essentially, like that. But I am requesting, my client asked if we could leave that 30"x30"x8' storage area there, which is presently where the shed is on the way down. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Mr. Kimack, I have one question. It doesn't state in the project description anything about extending the concrete walkway at the top of the landing, but it showed that in the plans. MR. KIMACK: I think it's on the plans, yes. I apologize, it was not in the description. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: We, or I, would not look favorably on wanting to extend that any closer, or any seaward.of its existing location because anything adds some extra runoff underneath the stairs. So perhaps you can do gravel or something that is more pervious as opposed to the concrete. MR. KIMACK: We can do bluestone on crushed -we can do base stone on top of crushed bluestone that is pervious. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Is there anyone else here wishing to speak regarding this application? (Negative response). Any questions or comments from the-Board? (Negative response). Hearing none, I make motion to close this hearing. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: I make a motion to approve this application with the condition that the concrete walkway is not extended and it is used as bluestone instead of the proposed concrete. And also noting that this is a replacement of existing stairs that have been there and is not new stairs, which will therefore bring it into consistency with the LWRP. That is my motion. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Second. Board of Trustees 37 August 17, 2022 TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). MR. KIMACK: Last, but not least. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Number 10, Michael Kimack on behalf of MICHAEL &ARGY MANTIKAS requests a Wetland Permit to remove existing vegetation on the bank face and to revegetate an approximately 880sq.ft. area of bank face with nine (9) different native plants (284) in 33 interrelated beds. Located: 80 South Lane, East Marion. SCTM# 1000-37-6-3.5 The LWRP coordinator found this to be consistent. The Conservation Advisory Council resolved to support the application. The Trustees most recently visited the site on the 9th of August and noted that there were boulders along the bottom, almost functioning as a revetment. As far as the beach grass, which was not indicated on the plans, should remain further out. Will review further at work session. Is there anyone here that wishes to speak regarding the application? MR. KIMACK: Michael Kimack, on behalf of the applicant. The boulders actually, basically they are more for I think breaking up the lines themselves, because there are so many different types of plantings this particular landscape architect put in there in order to do that more from an esthetic point of view. It's not a retaining wall because it's not a complete wall. It's simply a cluster of stones. But I will say that I think the stones basically, probably should be at least 50 to 100 pounds. We are not looking to put a pile of rubble there, for the most part. To give you an example, a 12"x12" is 150 pounds. So it's somewhere within that range. So it would be pretty much placed in order to break up the different plantings, basically, along the way. They are not meant or intended at all-to be a retaining wall. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: So they are not meant to protect property at all? MR. KIMACK: No, not at all. It's simply to break up the plantings there to, because in essence, as you look at from the description that I gave you, I think it was, they had eight different types of beds with 233 different types of plants in there. It was really intended to try and get some kind of breaking up to not have all of them look together. So the stone basically would break up the plants so they would have their own continuity. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: So I would like to hear maybe further Board discussion on the stones, but I do want to speak to one other point that I was making. I would say from about the bottom of the stairs seaward is largely American beach grass right now, and should probably remain that way. I'm not necessarily as one Trustee opposed to a Board of Trustees 38 August 17, 2022 re-vegetation of the bank. We've done it before. If you use some nice, native species and low-lying things and ground coverage, it does hold up nicely. But I would say seaward of the bottom of the stairs roughly based on these plans, I don't know if anyone wants to see them, is really kind of a dune that is protecting this bank, and it should remain. And to be honest with you, it probably just should be refortified with additional beach grass. MR. KIMACK: Well, if you look at what it is now, if you take the bottom and you look at the plant list on the description over there, you've got the C's which are the bayberries which are in there, as opposed to, which is a 1-A plant. So it has the same rooting system, as strong a system as your American beach grass would have. The G is basically the golden rods. All those in there, even the E's which are the pink clover grass, basically for beds, all these pretty much -- and then they have sumac, essentially like that -- have the same kind of durability as American beach grass has. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I really feel that, and this is just my opinion, I'd definitely take some other Board's comments, but I really feel from the bottom of those step seaward we are trying to revegetate a beach, a natural beach and dune, and it feels a little unnatural to me, and, like I said, I appreciate what you are trying to do. MR. KIMACK: I'll have to question you, is the American beach grass consistent all the way through to that property or-- TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Mostly. There is a good picture. It starts to fade out a little bit there. It's been taken over by some invasives, but it could easily be revegetated back to that bank line. I think it would do pretty well there. MR. KIMACK: You are recommending then, there are two ways to look at that. I may be able to have them in-filled where the American beach grass is not, with some of these plantings. That would be perhaps -- TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Supplement what is already existing. MR. KIMACK: Supplement what is already there. And leave the American beach grass in its place. There is a lot of it. And I quite frankly have not been at the site for some time. Once I set the stakes it's been some time ago. But I do remember now looking at the picture, that it was fine. So if we can leave the American beach grass where there are clusters and then put in, take some of these and put those in there, and have the landscaper identify where those are, put them on the plans where the American beach grass is indigenous and then do the other plantings around it as a fill-in. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: One of the things to consider is afternoon shading of these trees on this bank. MR. KIMACK: You have a lot of open spots. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: That might account for some of the open spots. Maybe the species that you in-fill, could be a little more shade tolerant. MR. KIMACK: I think so. Right. Look, I'm not an expert on the type of Board of Trustees 39 August 17, 2022 plants that they picked but I'm assuming that these are probably more shade tolerant and would do better in that area than the American beach grass is doing, because it looks a little scant at best. And I can have the landscaper identify where that is, take the clusters of American beach grass and then pull out those sections which he has proposed plantings, and put the beach glass in its place and then plant around the beach grass clusters with whatever needs to be filled in, where it's open ground. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Yes, there's milkweed, there's some wild peas. We did see seaside golden rod. So there are some pretty happy plants in there already. MR. KIMACK: Yes. And she's planting the golden rods back in, essentially like that, so everything that, you know, fit within that bank. But I can understand your concern that we don't want to disturb what is already there in terms of the rooting system. So if I can have her identify them and then plant around it to basically re-enforce it with what she's got here. All she has to basically do is pretty much take it from the seaward of the bottom of the stairs, identify those areas which contain the American beach grass, remove the proposed plantings for those areas, and then just bring the other ones against it, basically, so that you have the American beach grass as part of your planting plan. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: As one Trustee, and agreeing with what previously has been discussed from the other members of the Board, I think that all sounds reasonable. The one thing I would want to ensure is that this doesn't turn into a boulder garden. You know, I understand esthetically why the boulders, what you are calling boulders -- MR. KIMACK: I can ask her to cut it back a little bit. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: So the rest of what I was going to say is that I think, you know, to Trustee Krupski's point, that using the bottom of the stairs as the demarcation point would be helpful, and I think we were talking about re-vegetating some of these patchy areas of the American beach grass, whether it's with the beach,grass or something else, that the boulders don't appear in those areas. MR. KIMACK: Well, I think in looking at it right now, I think perhaps one of the recommendations that I would take back to my client is those boulders that are on the most seaward side.right now, we could removal, primarily, so that basically the plantings kind of in-fall back into the dunes without the boulders there. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: Fantastic. MR. KIMACK: I don't have a problem, I hope you don't, with the interspersing stone within the plantings area, but where it creates the perimeter on the seaward side, we can take those out. TRUSTEE PEEPLES: I think when we did review the plan the perimeter was, and the fact it did kind of encroach in what is a very kind of naturalized beach area. If you look to the neighbors on both sides, and if you look even further I think to Board of Trustees 40 August 17, 2022 the east there, there have been some hardened shorelines, and just do not have as much of a beach as these properties do. So I think that's something we are taking into consideration. MR. KIMACK: Okay. And I'll get back to the landscaper and have her basically identify the American beach grass that's there, and I'll recommend to them to pull the stones that are on the perimeter of the seaward side off so those particular, either the American beach grass or the plantings that would be surrounding the American beach grass at that particular point just flow right into the beach area without any stone intrusions. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: All right. So I have an additional thought about the application. I think if you were to submit new plans showing Rosa Rugosa, bayberry and American beach only, seaward of the bottom of that bank, which is in-line with the steps, and then remove any stones that are also seaward of that line, at the bottom of the steps, so that there are two kind of lines there that I would like to see removed. I would be willing to vote on that. Because I think it's simple enough. I would be willing to vote on that tonight. MR. KIMACK: So in that area seaward of that, we are looking, wherever the American beach areas are right now, and then the others would be the bayberry and what did you say? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Rosa Rugosa and beach grass. I would do those three. I mean there is some like Endless Summer hydrangea down there that is just not right for that area. MR. KIMACK: It's interesting, it's kind of like an anecdote, Rosa Rugosa I know was an invasive species at one time., but it has such a strong rooting system. But I'm glad you are beginning to consider it again as putting in -- TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Somehow it's become an acceptable species. MR. KIMACK: So do phragmites. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: That's true. So if that's what you would be willing to consider, it would be pulling those two kind of lines of stones seaward of the steps and eliminating some of those species. MR. KIMACK: So take that stone out seaward, identify the American beach grass area and then limit the other areas to the Rosa Rugosa and the bayberry along with the American beach grass. And everything above that would stay as it is on the design. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Okay. Any other additional thoughts from the Board members? (Negative response). Is there anyone else here that wishes to speak regarding this application? (Negative response). Hearing no further comments, I make a motion to close the hearing in this application. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL AYES). Board of Trustees 41 August 17, 2022 TRUSTEE KRUPSKi: And I make a motion to approve this application subject to submission of new plans depicting the removal of the seaward two lines of boulders, which are found seaward of the steps, the bottom of the steps, and only including seaward of the bottom of the steps Rosa Rugosa, bayberry and American beach grass. That is my motion. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Second. All in favor? (ALL AYES). MR. KIMACK: Thank you, very much. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Motion to adjourn. TRUSTEE SEPENOSKI: Second. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: All in favor? (ALL YES). Respectfully submitted by, JL 44;-�x Glenn Goldsmith, President Board of Trustees r Y . Glenn Goldsmith,President ��OF SOU)yD Town Hall Annex A. Nicholas Krupski,Vice President 64375 Route 25 Eric Sepenoski P.O.Box 1179 Liz Gillooly c� Southold,New York 11971 Elizabeth i Peeples � • yp Telephone(631) 765-1892 �yCOU t��v Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 27, 2022 RECEIVED Tom Wolpert Young & Young JAN 13 2023 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 Southold Town Clerk RE: MKS REALTY, LLC 1925 NORTH SEA DRIVE, SOUTHOLD SCTM# 1000-54-4-20 Dear Mr. Wolpert: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meetin held on Wednesday, December 14, 2022 regarding.the above matter: g WHEREAS, Young Young on behalf of MKS REALTY, LLC applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town.of Southold, and Chapter 111 of the Southold Town Code, Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas, application dated November 18 2021, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Adviso Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findin s ry and recommendations, and, g WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator recommended that the proposed applications be found Inconsistent with the LWRP, and specifically Inconsistent with the following coastal policies: Policy 4 - Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion; g �. Avoid development other than water-dependent uses in coastal hazard areas. Locate new development which is not water-dependent as far away from coastal hazard areas as practical. l i I� 2 a. NO DEVELOPMENT is permitted in natural protective feature areas, except as specifically allowed under the relevant portions of 6 NYCRR 505.8. b. Avoid hazards by siting structures to maximize the distance from Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas. 1. THE ENTIRE PARCEL IS LOCATED IN THE COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREA and the primary dune, a natural protective feature. No new development is permitted on a primary dune. 2. The entire structure is located within a VE El 13 flood zone. VE coastal areas are subject to high-velocity water including waves; defined by the one percent annual chance flood and wave effects three feet or greater. This means that the flood has a one percent chance of being met or exceeded in any given year. 3. The parcel and any development on the parcel will be adversely impacted by sea level rise over time. Policy 4.2 Protect and restore natural protective features; Maximize the protective capabilities of natural protective features by avoiding alteration or interference with shorelines in a natural condition; and WHEREAS, On October 17, 2007, a site visit of the area was conducted by representatives of the Trustees, the LWRP coordinator, and NYS DEC Environmental Specialist who collectively confirmed that the actions proposed on a neighboring parcel, more landward than the proposed actions herein, were entirely located seaward of the CEHA line and within a primary dune; and WHEREAS, the Conservation Advisory Council resolved to NOT support the application, as the proposed setbacks are too close to the wetland boundary within the primary and secondary dune, and within a flood zone. They noted the environmentally sensitive area, and any development of the property would deplete the natural habitat. WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on August 17, 2022 and December 14, 2022, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, 3 WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the structure, as applied for does not comply with the standards set forth in Southold Town Code Chapter 275-12A. Adversely affect the wetlands of the Town; B. Cause damage from erosion, turbidity or siltation; D. Adversely affect fish, shellfish or other beneficial marine organisms, aquatic wildlife and vegetation or the natural habitat thereof; E. Increase the danger of flood and storm-tide damage; H. Weaken or undermine the lateral support of other lands in the vicinity; I. Otherwise adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the Town; and J. Adversely affect the aesthetic value of the wetland and adjacent areas; and WHEREAS, some of the proposed structure, as applied for, is located in a primary dune area with the proposed deck and proposed pool encroaching seaward of the proposed dwelling into an environmentally sensitive area valuable to the people of the Town of Southold, and as applied for does not comply with: 111-9 Issuance of Permit. A coastal erosion management permit will be issued only with a finding by the Administrator that the proposed regulated activity: A. Is reasonable and necessary, considering reasonable alternatives to the proposed activity and the extent to which the proposed activity requires a shoreline location; B. Is not likely to cause a measurable increase in erosion at the proposed site and at other locations. C. Prevents, if possible, or minimizes adverse effects on natural protective features and their functions and protective values, existing erosion protection structures and natural resources; and, 111-13. Dune Area A. In primary dune areas: (1) Excavating, grading or mining of primary dunes is prohibited; (2) Clean sand of a compatible type and size is the only material which may be deposited. Any deposition requires a coastal erosion management permit; (3) All depositions must be vegetatively stabilized using species tolerant of the conditions at the site and must be placed so as to increase the size of, or restore, a dune or dune area; (4) Active bird nesting and breeding areas must not be disturbed, unless such disturbance is pursuant to a specific wildlife management activity approved, in writing, by the Department, (5) Nonmajor additions to existing structures are allowed on primary dunes pursuant to a coastal erosion management permit and subject to permit conditions concerning the location, design and potential impacts of the structure on the primary dune; (6) Stone revetments or other erosion protection structures compatible with primary dunes will only be allowed at the waterward toe of primary dunes and must not interfere with the exchange of sand between primary dunes and their fronting beaches; and WHEREAS, the project, as applied for, is not permitted under Chapter 111 insofar as it is located in a primary dune area; and WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing on August 17, 2022, the owner of that neighboring parcel, Robert Bombara, of 1725 North Sea Drive, testified that the Trustees must follow precedence which established, in a prior application before Trustees, during the application process and appeal before the Southold Town Board, through testimony taken before the Board, the location of the primary dune in this particular area, and no structure shall be located seaward of the primary dune line; and 4 WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the request, as applied for, will have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, and, adversely weaken or undermine the lateral support of other lands in the vicinity NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that for foregoing reasons, and because the proposed action is located within the coastal erosion hazard area and in a primary dune area, and because the proposed action is not permitted in such areas pursuant to Chapters 275 and 111 of the Town Code, that the Trustees deem the proposed project to be impermissible under Chapter 275 and Chapter 111, and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that for the foregoing reasons, the Board of Trustees DENIES the Wetland and Coastal Erosion Permit application of MKS REALTY, LLC to construct a two- story 3,053 sf footprint dwelling with garage; a proposed 21'10" x 11'9" ( 253.5 sf) seaward bedroom balcony with railing system; a proposed 10'4" x 20'2" (191.7 sf) mezzanine level bedroom balcony & railing system; a privacy screen wall along the west side, and a 6' wide spiral staircase to ground; a 1,484 sf raised deck with a 448 sf pool on seaward side, privacy screening along portion of east side, a 3'9" wide stairs with railings to ground to west, and a 3'6" stairs with railing to ground to east; proposed 10' wide bar/grill area on pool deck; 513 sf of non-pervious front entry stairs; proposed 3,183 sf of stone blend driveway; 1,200 gallon underground propane tank, new I/A OWTS sanitary system, ie. one (1) 500 gallon wastewater treatment unit and four (4) 8.51 by 2' effect. depth sanitary leaching galleys; public water service connection; new storm water control structures for roof runoff and driveway runoff; approximately 480 cy of clean material from the excavated areas will be used to fill the site to the proposed grades; and all mechanical equipment (ie. A/C unit) to be located above the second- story structure; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by R. Shatarah Consulting Engineers, P.C., last dated October 11, 2022. This determination should not be considered a determination made for any other Department or Agency, which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. Very truly yours, A 71 -t�Ir�/ , ) I Glenn Goldsmith, President Board of Trustees GG/dd Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Tom Wolpert <TCW@youngengineering.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 3:16 PM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth Cc: Goldsmith, Glenn; Krupski, Nick; Gillooly, Liz; Peeples, Elizabeth; Sepenoski, Eric; 'pcmoore@mooreattys.com'; 'Ed Licalzi (elicalzi@cmagroupinc.com)'; Doug Adams; Doris Connolly Subject: RE: MKS Realty, LLC at Southold,T/O Southold, NY Attachments: SKM_C25822120616010.pdf Elizabeth, Attached is a copy of the shortened project description, for your use. Kindly advise us if this format is acceptable. Thank you for your assistance. Tom nn Tom Wolpert C � ll Young&Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead,NY 11901 MC P022 UU 631.727.2303 1vwr" ora sugn¢crx�nt Southold Town losrd of Trustees From:Cantrell, Elizabeth [mailto:elizabethc@town.southold.ny.usj Sent:Tuesday, December 06, 2022 3:06 PM To:Tom Wolpert<TCW@youngengineering.com> Cc: Goldsmith, Glenn <glenn.goldsmith@town.southold.ny.us>; Krupski, Nick<nickk@southoldtownny.gov>; Gillooly, Liz <lizg@southoldtownny.gov>; Peeples, Elizabeth<elizabethp@southoldtownny.gov>; Sepenoski, Eric <erics@southoldtownny.gov>; 'pcmoore@mooreattys.com' <pcmoore@mooreattys.com>; 'Ed Licalzi (elicalzi@cmagroupinc.com)' <elicalzi@cmagroupinc.com>; Doug Adams<DEA@youngengineering.com>; Doris Connolly <DAC@youngengineering.com> Subject: RE: MKS Realty, LLC at Southold,T/0 Southold, NY Thank you Tom, however, regarding the format of the project description the Board requires a format that matches what you see on the Trustees Legal Noticing/agendas. What was emailed we did receive on Dec. 2"d as well as in your email earlier today. Please have the description shortened to more fit with what the Board commonly requires when projects are revised. Thank you. Senior Office Assistant Town of Southold Board of Trustees Office: 631-765-1892 Email Az 1 From:Tom VVo|pert Sent:Tuesday, December 6, 20222:2SPM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth Cc:Goldsmith, Glenn Krupski, Nick GiUomk\ Uz Peep|es, E|izabeth Sepenoski, Eric 'pcm000re@nnooreattys.conn' 'EdUca|zi ( ' Doug Adams Doris Connolly Subject: RE: MKS Realty, LLC atSouthold,l7OSouthold, NY Good Afternoon Elizabeth, Attached isacopy ofthe Project Narrative for MKS Realty, LLC dated December 6, 302Zprepared byLand Use Ecological Services, Inc. including the Description of Proposed Activities and Existing Dune Conditions prepared by Young /&Young,for your use. |fyou have any questions, please contact us. Tom Tom Wolpert EC E � VE ,o Young 0cYoung 40OOstrander Avenue Riverhead,NYll9Ol 031.727.2303 D EC' 2022 Southold Town From:Cantrell, Elizabeth [ ] Sent: Monday, December OS, 2O33O:47AK8 To:Tom VVo|pe/t< \ Cc:Goldsmith, Glenn KrupsN, Nick GiUooky, Liz LizL,R,�gut�o1dtowrLr1y.? >; Peeples Elizabeth Sepenoshi, Ehc 'pcnmoona��n000reat�s.conn' 'E� L�a|zi � ' Dou8Adanos Doris Connolly � � Subject RE: MKS Realty, LLC atSouthold,T/O Southold, NY ; Good Morning Tom, On Friday a submission was made on behalf of MKS Realty with the request to be on the December 14, 2022 public hearing date. The proposed has been modified in several ways, as per the site plan last revised 10/11/22 and received on 12/2/22. When a proposed project is modified, a full revised project description is required to be submitted to the Board as the site plan now differs from the original legally noticed project. Please submit no later than end of day tomorrow(12/6/22) a revised written project description that includes the dimensions for each structure (e.g. entry steps, each deck, walkway to water, driveway, amount of ifill being added, etc.) Senior Office Assistant Town ofSouthold Board ofTruoteos 2 Office: 631-765-1892 From: Cantrell, Elizabeth Sent:Tuesday, October 18 202213:39PM Tm: 7onnVVo|pert' Cc:Goldsmith, Glenn Kmpski, Nick GiUooly, Uz Peeples, Elizabeth Sepenoski, Eric ' EdLica|zi ( ) Doug Adams Doris Connolly Subject: RE: MKS Realty, LLC u1Southold,T/OSouthold, NY Good Afternoon Tom, During the Board of Trustees Work Session held on 10/17/2022,the Board reviewed the revised plans last revised on 10/11/2022 and submitted on 10/17/2022 and have determined that at this time the Board is requesting revisions to the latest proposed plans. Given this request the application is postponed from the October 19, 2022 Public Hearing and will be rescheduled to the December 14, 2022 Public Hearing date (Field inspection date is December 7, 2022), if the following ixsubmitted: ? Revised written project description containing all proposed structures with dimensions for each (e.8. do not combine decking areas, please keep each patio/cleck/walkway separate), (a) changes made to date, and (b) those forthcoming asper below. ? The Board is requesting comments on the necessity of several concrete pads located beneath the structure on piles. ? The Board highly recommends pulling proposed pool landward within pier line. ? The Board is requesting more information/details about the fill beneath shed on West side of parcel, and if necessary revise onplans. ? Relocate dryweU#1and #Slandward ofproposed structure. ? DesiQnate |andsseawardof|ivin8structuretobea "Non'0sturbanceBufferArea^ onp|ans. ? The Board isrequesting anupdated re-vegetation plan. D E C E FEE�:I' / Senior Office Assistant . To*nofSoutbok{ � Board ofTrustees Office: 631-765-1892 Southold Town Board�roxi|� of Trustees | From:Tom VVo|pert Sent: Friday, October 7, 2O223:18PW1 To:Cantrell, Elizabeth< Cc: Goldsmith, Glenn ; Krupski, Nick ;Gi!!oo|y, Liz Peeples, Elizabeth 5epenoski, Ehc >; Ed Lica|zi / ) Doug Adams Doris Connolly Subject: RE: MKS Realty, LLC atSouthold,T/OSouthold, NY Good Afternoon Elizabeth, 3 Please be advised that we are in the process of revising the plans to further address the concerns of the Board and will be submitting the revised plans and revised project description as soon as possible. We understand that all proposed structures shown on the revised plans will need to be re-staked prior to the Board of Trustees field inspection. Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions, please contact us. Tom Tom Wolpert nSout'hol'd Young&Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead,NY 11901 631.727.2303Town or of Traalo From: Cantrell, Elizabeth [riiaallto:r%lJzabethc town. outholdl.n .0 ] Sent:Thursday,October 06, 2022 12:22 PM To:Tom Wolpert<'T t n en uLe > Cc: Goldsmith, Glenn <Lq.ie. nn. ollds rflthtown.soUtl'p,la Krupski, Nick<wiic( @.,o tgio1 tQynnyy>;Gillooly, Liz <li g�southoldtown_yamoy> Peeples, Elizabeth <ol'x beth _S0Uthodtownn . Qv>; Sepenoski, Eric _ <erics0southo8dto �nnY.v> Subject: MKS Realty, LLC Good Morning Tom, Regarding the revised plans received on October 4, 2022 for the application referenced above, the Board has reviewed the revised plans last revised 10/4/2022 and determined that the plans do not reflect an accurate pier line. As discussed during the August 9, 2022 and September 7, 2022 field inspections, and during the August 17, 2022 Public Hearings the proposed structures should be no further seaward than the existing living space area, not decking, pools or walkways/catwalks. The most seaward line of a living space area is where the pier line should be taken from. You/The property owner are welcome to submit revised plans at your convenience that depict what the Board of Trustees have requested,or you/the property owner are welcome to request in writing that the Board of Trustees move forward with the current set of plans and re-open the public hearing for a possible determination. If you/the property owner decide to submit revised plans based on the correct pier line,the project will need to be re-staked based on the revised plans for Board of Trustee review prior to field inspections. Sincerely, 0 r"/ ease(e Senior Office Assistant Town of Southold Board of Trustees Office: 631-765-1892 Email eliz b rl '4P,ob;d t cit )'K.1,�,�:: &.'n' 4 Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Tom Wolpert <TCW@youngengineering.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 3:16 PM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth Cc: Goldsmith, Glenn; Krupski, Nick; Gillooly, Liz; Peeples, Elizabeth; Sepenoski, Eric; 'pcmoore@mooreattys.com'; 'Ed Licalzi (elicalzi@cmagroupinc.com)'; Doug Adams; Doris Connolly Subject: RE: MKS Realty, LLC at Southold, T/O Southold, NY Attachments: SKM_C25822120616010.pdf Elizabeth, Attached is a copy of the shortened project description,for your use. Kindly advise us if this format is acceptable. Thank you for your assistance. Tom Tom Wolpert 400 Ostrander Avenue E C E Young&Young Riverhead,NY 11901 631.727.2303 DEC Southold Town Board of Trustees From: Cantrell, Elizabeth [mailto:elizabethc@town.southold.ny.us] Sent:Tuesday, December 06, 2022 3:06 PM To:Tom Wolpert<TCW@youngengineering.com> Cc: Goldsmith, Glenn<glenn.goldsmith@town.southo Id.ny.us>; Krupski, Nick<nickk@southoldtownny.gov>; Gillooly, Liz <lizg@southoldtownny.gov>; Peeples, Elizabeth <elizabethp@southoldtownny.gov>; Sepenoski, Eric <erics@southoldtownny.gov>; 'pcmoore@ mooreattys.com'<pcmoore@mooreattys.com>; 'Ed Licalzi (elicalzi@cmagroupinc.com)' <elicalzi@cmagroupinc.com>; Doug Adams<DEA@youngengineering.com>; Doris Connolly <DAC@youngengineering.com> Subject: RE: MKS Realty, LLC at Southold,T/O Southold, NY Thank you Tom, however, regarding the format of the project description the Board requires a format that matches what you see on the Trustees Legal Noticing/agendas. What was emailed we did receive on Dec. 2nd as well as in your email earlier today. Please have the description shortened to more fit with what the Board commonly requires when projects are revised. Thank you. Senior Office Assistant Town of Southold Board of Trustees Office: 631-765-1892 Email ��fl.zaI;e tbc(z�" cXu h 1c9: : ., 1 From:Tom VVo|pert Sent:Tuesday, December 6, 3O222:2SPM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth Cc: Goldsmith, Glenn KrupsW Nick Gi|looly, Uz Peep|e� E|izabeth ; 5epenoski Eric < ; 'pcnnoore@mooneattyszom' ; 'Ed Lica|zi ' ; DougAdams ; Doris Connolly Subject: RE: MKS Realty, LLC atSouthold,T/OSouthold, NY Good Afternoon Elizabeth, Attached is copy ofthe Project Narrative for MKS Realty, LLC dated December 6, 2022 prepared by Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. including the Description of Proposed Activities and Existing Dune Conditions prepared by Young &Young, for your use. If you have any questions, please contact us. Tom Tom Wolpert Young&Young 400Ostrander Avenue � Riverhead,NYIl9O1 / 631.727.2303 DEC 2022 Southold Town L___�oard of Trustees From: Cantrell, Elizabeth [ Sent: Monday, December OS, 2OZ2Q:47AK8 To:Tom VVo|pert Cc: Goldsmith, Glenn< � Krupski, Nick� ; GiUoo|y, Liz ; Peeples, Elizabeth ; Sepenoski, Eric 'pcn000re@mooneattys.cono' 'EdLica|zi ( ' ; Doug Adams ; Doris Connolly Subject: RE: MKS Realty LLC atSouthold,l/O Southold, NY Good Morning Tom, On Friday a submission was made on behalf of MKS Realty with the request to be on the December 14, 2022 public hearing date. The proposed has been modified in several ways, as per the site plan last revised 10/11/22 and received on 12/2/22. When a proposed project is modified, a full revised project description is required to be submitted to the Board as the site plan now differs from the original legally noticed project. Please submit no later than end of day tomorrow(13/6/IJ) a revised written project description that includes the dimensions for each structure (e.g. entry steps' each deck' walkway to water, driveway, amount ofifiU being added, etc) Senior Office Assistant Town o[Sour6o}d Board ofTrustees 2 Office: 8]1-765 1892 From: Cantrell, Elizabeth Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 203Z13:39PK4 To: 'TonoVVo|peML' Cc: Goldsmith, Glenn Krupski, Nick ;GiUooky, Liz —9 jgutho1dtovNnny.gov>; Peeples E|izobeth SepenoskiEric eat� EdUca|zi ( Doug Adams Doris Connolly Subject: RE: MKS Realty, LLC atSouthold,T/OSouthold, NY Good Afternoon Tom, During the Board of Trustees Work Session held on 10/17/2022, the Board reviewed the revised plans last revised on 10/11/2022 and submitted on 10/17/2022 and have determined that at this time the Board is requesting revisions to the latest proposed plans. Given this request the application is postponed from the October 19, 2022 Public Hearing and will be rescheduled to the December 14, 2022 Public Hearing date (Field Inspection date is December 7, 2022), if the following issubmitted: ? Revised written project description containing all proposed structures with dimensions for each (e.g. do not combine decking areas, please keep each patio/deck/walkway separate), (a) changes made to date, and (b) those forthcoming asper below. ? The Board is requesting comments on the necessity of several concrete pads located beneath the structure on piles. ? The Board highly recommends pulling proposed pool landward within pier line. 7 The Board is requesting more information/details about the fill beneath shed on West side ofparcel, and if necessary revise onplans. ? Relocate drym/eU #1and #Slandward ofproposed structure. ? DesiQnate |andsseavxardof|ivingstructuretobea ^Non'Disturbance8ufferArea" onp|ans. ? The Board isrequesting anupdated re-vegetation plan. Senior Office Assistant Town ofSouthold Board of Trustees DEC 2022 {}86cc: 631'785'1892 Eouo& Southold Town Board of Trustees From:Tom VVo|pert Sent: Friday, October 7, 2O2Z3:10PM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth Cc: Gm|dsmith, Glenn< Krupski, Nick GiUoo|y, Liz Peeples, Elizabeth Sepenoski, Ehc « EdLica|zi ( Doug Adams Doris Connolly Subject: RE: MKS Realty, LLC atSouthold,T/O Southold, NY Good Afternoon Elizabeth, 3 Please be advised that we are in the process of revising the plans to further address the concerns of the Board and will be submitting the revised plans and revised project description as soon as possible. We understand that all proposed structures shown on the revised plans will need to be re-staked prior to the Board of Trustees field inspection. Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions, please contact us. Tom Tom Wolpert 2 Young&Young E 400 Ostrander Avenue 631.727.2303 Y 11901 a Vm �^ Southold Town Board of Trustees From: Cantrell, Elizabeth [rra lto.elizabetiic @ town„. p2Lho1d.ny.us1 Sent:Thursday, October 06, 2022 12:22 PM To:Tom Wolpert<TCW2y LiLi en ineerin-tcom'r7> Cc:Goldsmith, Glenn<gienn. oidstr0i c to Ln >; Krupski, Nick<nickk 5) utholidtownny.gov>; Gillooly, Liz <lizgLtsoutlioldtowr:Liygov>; Peeples, Elizabeth < Ili a ethta SOL.i:holdtownn . ov�>;Sepenoski, Eric <er�cs(asoutholrj > Subject: MKS Realty, LLC Good Morning Tom, Regarding the revised plans received on October 4, 2022 for the application referenced above,the Board has reviewed the revised plans last revised 10/4/2022 and determined that the plans do not reflect an accurate pier line. As discussed during the August 9, 2022 and September 7, 2022 field inspections, and during the August 17, 2022 Public Hearings the proposed structures should be no further seaward than the existing living space area, not decking, pools or walkways/catwalks. The most seaward line of a living space area is where the pier line should be taken from. You/The property owner are welcome to submit revised plans at your convenience that depict what the Board of Trustees have requested, or you/the property owner are welcome to request in writing that the Board of Trustees move forward with the current set of plans and re-open the public hearing for a possible determination. If you/the property owner decide to submit revised plans based on the correct pier line,the project will need to be re-staked based on the revised plans for Board of Trustee review prior to field inspections. Sincerely, Senior Office Assistant Town of Southold Board of Trustees Office: 631-765-1892 Email c �g�ti:q....i_ �rd� ,;i..i_w. 4 M"I U: Revised December 6, 2022 �0ut1jold Ton Revised June 3, 2022 Board of Trustees November 12, 2021 ATTACHMENT TO BOARD OF TRUSTEES APPLICATION prepared for MKS Realty, LLC at Southold, T/O Southold, New York Project Description For a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to construct a two- story 3,053 sf footprint dwelling with garage; a proposed 21'10" x 11'9" ( 253.5 sf) seaward bedroom balcony with railing system; a proposed 10'4" x 20'2" (191.7 sf) mezzanine level bedroom balcony & railing system; a privacy screen wall along the west side, and a 6' wide spiral staircase to ground; a 1,484 sf raised deck with a 448 sf pool on seaward side, privacy screening along portion of east side, a 3'9" wide stairs with railings to ground to west, and a 3'6" stairs with railing to ground to east; proposed 10' wide bar/grill area on pool deck; 513 sf of non-pervious front entry stairs; proposed 3,183 sf of stone blend driveway; 1,200 gallon underground propane tank, new I/A OWTS sanitary system, ie. one (1) 500 gallon wastewater treatment unit and four (4) 8.5'L by 2' effect. depth sanitary leaching galleys; public water service connection; new storm water control structures for roof runoff and driveway runoff; approximately 480 cy of clean material from the excavated areas will be used to fill the site to the proposed grades; and all mechanical equipment (ie. A/C unit) to be located above the second- story structure. Page 2 of 2 December 6, 2022 Lot Coverage Proposed Structure Area Percent Coverage Frame House & Garage 3,053 sf 5.2 % Raised Deck 1,484 sf 2.5 % Pool 448 sf 0.7 % Front Entry Stairs 513 sf 0.9 % Stone Blend Driveway 3,183 sf 5.4 % Tota 1 8,631 sf 14.7 % C D E yC 2022 Southold Town Board of Trustees Project Narrative f°rL� C� C� dE SKS ;fealty, LLC D �� � .0 Southold Town gourd of Trustoes _J at 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold SCTM #1000-54-4-20 December 6, 2022 Project Narrative Prepared B Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. 570 Expressway Drive South, Suite 2F, Medford,NY 11763 La Use Comact: Kelly Risotto, Senior Ecologist/GIS Manager Tel. (631) 727-2400 i,oN �.�,�-�:� �, Email. Lg isoagri us( Is, Description of Proposed Activities and Existing Dune Conditions Prepared By Young& Young 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead,NY 11901 Contact: Douglas Adams Tel. (631) 727-0144 Email I 1 r� �p ���geenTI&C rn U LS U h UV 6 11 IL! DEC ,,,,,,,, C 2022 S;Rhold Tow ar Project Purpose and Need Board of Trustees The purpose of this project is the development of the last existing vacant lot within the developed neighborhood north of North Sea Drive as a single family residence. The residence is proposed in line with or landward of the existing line of development. The site approximately 1.35 acres, and is zoned residential R-40. This use is compatible with current zoning as well as the existing character of the neighborhood. Descrintion of Proposed Activities, The property owner is applying for a Wetland Permit and Coastal Erosion Permit from the Town of Southold for construction of a two-story 3,053 SF single family dwelling with attached garage; 21'10"x 11'9" (253.5 SF) seaward bedroom balcony with railing system; 10'4" x 20'2" (191.7 SF) mezzanine level bedroom balcony with railing system;privacy screen wall along the west side;6'wide spiral staircase to ground; 1,484 SF raised deck on the north and east sides containing a 448 SF pool on the east side; 3'9" wide stairs with railings to grade on the north side; 3'6" stairs with railing to grade on the east side; 10' wide bar/grill area on the pool deck; 513 SF impervious front entry stairs on the south side;3,183 pervious stone blend driveway; 1,200 gal underground propane tank; innovative/alternative onsite wastewater treatment system (VA OWTS) containing (1) 500 gal wastewater treatment unit and (4) 8.5' L x 2' effective depth sanitary leaching galleys; public water service connection; and stormwater management system with (5) 10' diameter x 3' deep drywells for storage and treatment of runoff from 2 inch rainfall event. Approximately 480 CY of clean fill from excavated areas will be used for site grading. All mechanical equipment will be located above the second story structure. A breakdown of the size of each proposed structure is provided on the Survey/Site Plan, as well as in the table below. Proposed Structure Size(SF) %Lot Covera e Dwelling 3,053 5.2 Deck 1,484 2.5 Pool 448 0.8 Front Stairs/Landings 513 0.9 Gravel Driveway 3,183 5.4 TOTAL 8,681 14.7 The project has been designed to maximize setbacks to Long Island Sound(>213 feet), the beach (> 100 feet), the dune/beach ridge crest (> 30 feet), and the landward limit of the dune/beach ridge (> 2 feet). Structures are proposed on piles and elevated to meet current FEMA requirements for a VE El. 13 flood zone per map #36103C0154H (effective 9/25/2009). Structures will also be designed in accordance with standards set forth in ASCE/SEI 24-14, Flood Resistant Design and Construction, for construction in coastal high hazard areas. These standards have been adopted by NYS and the Town within their respective building codes. Wastewater will be treated with an UA OWTS proposed in the southwest corner of the site and sized in accordance with Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS)residential standards. This I/A OWTS will reduce nitrogen loading to groundwater and surface waters when compared with traditional sanitary systems, and is the preferred environmental alternative for development in sensitive areas. Stormwater from a 2 inch rainfall event will be treated and stored in drywells proposed throughout the site. Pool backwash water will also be treated and stored in a drywell specific to that purpose. Approximately 200 feet (width) of beach and dune habitat will be preserved with this project, through establishment of a variable width natural and undisturbed buffer seaward of development activities. The Project Narrative 12/2/2022 1925 North Sea Drive,Southold 1/3 DEC 6 202-2 UU 130 d�hold yes buffer is 100-120 feet wide within the vegetated dune, and an additional 90-100 feet wide within the existing beach habitat. Areas of disturbance will be planted with native vegetation in accordance with the Native Planting Plan. Trees to be planted along the property edges include Eastern red-cedar (Juniperus virginiana) and post oak (Quercus stellata). Shrubs to be planted include bayberry (Morella pensylvanica) and beach plum (Prunus maritima). Herbaceous species to be planted and seeded include American beach grass (Ammophila breviligulata), coastal panicgrass (Panicum amarum), and seaside goldenrod (Solidago sempervirens). All of these species are currently found within vegetated areas of the property. For protection of adjacent properties, natural areas, and Long Island Sound, areas of disturbance will be contained with a perimeter silt fence installed in accordance with NYSDEC and Town standards for fence height and embedment. Silt fence shall be installed prior to the start of any construction activities, shall be maintained for the duration of construction, and will be removed after final stabilization of the site is achieved. Existing EcologicalConditions The subject property is undeveloped and largely undisturbed. The northern third of the site is unvegetated beach habitat to the property boundary at mean high water. The central third of the site is a vegetated dune habitat with herbaceous species that include beach grass (Ammophila breviligulata), beach pea (Lathyrus japonicas), coastal panicgrass (Panicum amarum), common reed(Phragmites australis, sparse), and salt hay(Spartina patens, sparse and in upland); a large patch of Rugosa rose (Rosa rugosa); and some bayberry (Morella pensylvanica) [Exhibit 1, Photos]. The southern third of the site contains patchy shrubs, including bayberry and beach plum (Prunus maritima); and patchy trees including Eastern red-cedar (Juniperus virginiana) and post oak (Quercus stellata). Herbaceous vegetation in the southern third of the site is sparse, mainly coastal panicgrass. Along the road edge, non-native and invasive species such as black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) and autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellate) mix with post oak and eastern red-cedar. Little blue stem (Schizachyrium scoparium) is also present along the road edge. Existing Dune Conditions Site topography was utilized for mapping of dune features by the surveyor. The location of the crest of dune/beach ridge is indicated as coincident to the highest recorded elevations, moving landward from the beach area, prior to sloping downward. The location of the landward toe of the dune/beach ridge was developed from a combination of following the methodology of the Bombara(adjacent west) application, as well as the grades and vegetation spanning between the two adjacent developed properties. Beach and Dune Chan Over Time The shoreline along North Sea Drive is stable. Aerial photographs were utilized to digitize the dry beach in 1957, 1971, 1994, 2013 (post-Sandy), and 2020 (Exhibit 2, Aerial Timeline). As demonstrated by aerials going back 65 years, the beach is stable, with fluctuations of 5-15 feet between 1957 and 1994. The beach was at its nar owest in 2vi3, 1Vllowing SuperstWmn. Sandy in %J Muer 20112, and has accreted 40-65 feet in the vicinity of the subject property since 2013. Based on 2020 aerials and the site survey,the dry beach area is currently at its widest since 1957. In addition to dry shoreline, the general limit of dune vegetation was digitize from aerial photographs in 1957, 1971, 1994, 2013, and 2020 (Exhibit 3, Vegetated Dune Limit). The vegetated dune has actually Project Narrative 12/2/2022 1925 North Sea Drive,Southold 2/3 1. ECA 6 2022 expanded seaward (i.e. north) 50-57 feet at the subject property since 1957. Si, ilar to t the vegetated dune is currently at its widest/most seaward since 1957. Board of Trustees Based on this analysis, the site at 1925 North Sea Drive is stable, with no significant coastal erosion occurring to the beach or dune in the past 65 years for which this analysis was performed.North Sea Drive has undergone residential development along its length during this time; residential development has not affected the beach and dune system, as evidenced by the analysis performed. Development of the subject property, preserving 23,100± SF of vegetated dune and the entire beach, is therefore not anticipated to negatively impact these protective features. Alternatives Considered Alternatives considered include No Action and construction of alternate structure design,sizes,and layout. No Action does not achieve the goal of the project to provide a single family residence for the owner, and was therefore dismissed. There have been several iterations of site layouts presented for this project, including alternative sizes and configurations of the various structures, locating the structures seaward, and proposing a catwalk and gazebo over the dune. Based on analysis and feedback received from the Town of Southold, the dwelling was reconfigured and relocated as far landward as possible to maximize wetland and dune setbacks and to maximize preservation of natural habitat. The catwalk and gazebo was also removed for protection of the existing natural dune. Potential Impacts and. Mitigation Measures Proposed to R duco Im acts Mitigation measures proposed with this project include preservation of an approximately 200-foot wide buffer as natural beach and dune habitat, planting of disturbed areas with native vegetation, installation of an I/A OWTS to reduce nitrogen loading to groundwater and surface waters, and installation of a stormwater management system to treat and store runoff prior to discharge to Long Island Sound. As a result of these changes to the project design and proposed mitigation and protection measures, there are no impacts anticipated to adjacent properties. Runoff will be contained onsite with the stormwater management system. Adjacent properties will be screened with native vegetation in accordance with the Native Planting Plan. Proposed development is in line with or landward of the line of development for the north side of North Sea Drive, including the adjacent properties. The Town of Southold has documented shorebird nesting between McCabe's Beach and Kenny's Beach, where this stretch includes the beach on and north of the site. Specifically, the Town has documented piping plovers (Charadrius melodus) nesting on this stretch of beach; plovers prefer to nest on the unvegetated beach landward of mean high water during the months of April—August. Due to the existing residential development along this stretch of North Sea Drive, the landward design of this residence proposed in line with or landward of the existing development and> 100 feet landward of their preferred beach habitat, and the proposed natural buffer, there are no impacts anticipated to nesting plovers or their preferred beach habitat. Development is proposed approximately 40 feet landward of the dune crest, and will impact existing vegetation on the back dune. However, imps its are minimized by projPCt design which maximizes preservation of natural areas and proposes native vegetation in areas of disturbance. As a result of these design and preservation features, impacts on the function of the dune as a protective feature are not anticipated. Project Narrative 12/2/2022 1925 North Sea Drive,Southold 3/3 C U C 6 202 Southold Tbwn IRo rd of rusteas MKS Realty LLC—Southold Exhibit 1 1925 North Sea Drive I SCTM#1000-54-4-20 Site photos taken 11/2/2002 by Land Use Ecological Services,Inc. r J r, : i w ✓, .. � � hl � �" �p.�1 a w,. „J,/. "Url, r V°� i � ' G %✓��/','��1%J��9iu�, I 'NDN r" N N F 1 ' I E c E � WE 0 ! EC .w. 6 2022 So ig;ld To'M1t'1'71 Board of T"rustes MKS Realty LLC—Southold Exhibit 1 1925 North Sea Drive I SCTM#1000-54-4-20 Site photos taken 11/2/2002 by Land Use Ecological Services,Inc. rrr ,. ,r ,�..,. r r�,Nrvur„✓ it ri.t�im� /t!�//,/aa, ri„ <, , ./., ,.. ,.- ,..,,.,. / // i,/ //„ ,r.T r/.”/",:f//, � � �, y ,, " a � WOma k� I � ✓r n �f"rr m ECSC WE 2022 8olufhtld Town Board of Trustees MKS Realty LLC—Southold Exhibit 1 1925 North Sea Drive I SCTM#1000-54-4-20 Site photos taken 11/2/2002 by Land Use Ecological Services,Inc. r � l m✓��� �il�mm"+rmrW U� �r" ��r J °IWC✓ r�� ' 01 �Po � vrr,,. /I���� e ,�� ry r�P;.,� " r;, ,r: y � �� / ^��«`b m� � �'W ��"� � i i" it 1Nm>•. ..� "Ic 41 ,x:�i � ova ✓1 T4 a, r Y � m � rrm m t r";., t "'� a r k Vii. "�. �� �r sry`���'�� ✓„✓,J,r 1�''ii Vii.. w� � ��r��.k, � i iw,mtil�`� D1�`, � r,, .W�" !� "" '�'.fir,Y;,, � '.�1 ;m'm y�"iW' "%� +�� � s,i �� °"��,"`""m l� ''�,/ �iu; '�reN / ✓' �iJ%yi i '���.„""m' ��� IJ'w� r~�`"�1�� "fl ,;.�y i""aip ,H` i r „ ;. y, a �„D,. r �'""`.;A� ,n4mi�.��YrpS” rel r'�a°y„w,j�iyi�,, i"��v% r lir r�NnP � �%di�! J/ � p J J f/1 ✓; :"p �W rli„ "d„w' ," l!.. `"r u ✓�. i a�� p9i�r �� ,✓,;�°711""" ,,�' � �ti i y?N :i w 'py p ri vi,l e � 'rt" � � r ",�,;iu v -1� � lr�ar /� �i��'� "r�n 1' l J ✓"u�(� r'm , � -� "'�';1� '�N�. j r Avr�;,, w... .,�� ,d;s. ,ms, mi, Iii i✓ r r � G,1 r ,,e q I i r,� r'i "„ ,, mnri,f�F r �aiu�✓ + t; �, W�.,e r c o �(�%� r W�,✓�,� m � ,.ryi�. ,i ak„r.cr,,. ,uW6� �^�.�' ' r i v i u J my�l i her s if I �„ I �. � :,. .: „; /i�,'�, :.;w:v�,�`°��IW rtu,d�''M�,r �"m✓�>�,�����f;�ry�,:ro� ��� ✓,"�"*,��Ir��7�,,,� !����''."��,,;%� �� � i m Pw w.. M I r .� Y/�r N r SIT VIw» w r ,a P: ` ✓ ` i'" � r �, '„� NN ,4 s ” t ��✓�IIS���✓h r 9t'� 1 � err z,�4w✓ NW 4 r » ✓ /it G����«, t !� �. �✓ ✓; Ali !r°!9, ✓ f rt i CZ) CO aZa 75 of �� ^ ro"'�f'�..:.,/ I A/,p l,�uG �� „! �� !�l„//��� �r{, !�/f��/p/`IN��/J r� bac.ii i ;,% Yl(i�fji��� /� ''i`'�,/;✓�� Y ,� H � oiJl �. I Zdge of Dry Shoreline "1011 i "e, 1957 1957 �k W V� 1994 U >� 20 1 2l 04, i,`�i' Y7�il� i}'pix d'v6f +>�ll�id`JS f�1;Qd �r�'ulM''y .P�IJ� dluiioia�!1 �1�"�f „. 2020 1957 and 1971 aerials from USGS Earth Explorer. 1994,2013,and 2020 aerials From NYSG[SClearinghouse 2 1 in—150 ft Prepared By: Land Use Ecological Services,Inc„ Project DRY SHORELINE CHANGE 570 Expressway Drive South,Suite 2F For: MKS Realty,LLC Landti'se Medford,NY 11763 At: 1925 North Sea Dr,Southold,NY 0 50 100 200 SCTM 91000-54-4-20 It .. a" Date: 12/2/2022 Revised: Scale:As Noted Exhibit 2 "^ , �� «,rig �p 1 UIY r✓J 1 ��1,-,'w w y.m r c' f7f G lig "�urlu� � �N' V Otl,, SITE wry �i -77,77771'007 RROWIRROWW"WORWORM, 1100 M Ilk Ot moi cl k r r w+„� N raves t f I Y i' f�IfiV , 9 nf� t 'Asry ` I r _ �i,ei. 11� /@i' rw�r a.i➢,iP'iN, v ,w c rvr✓1 h„ ,.d,rric r...v L nr. �.e ,,, ,„ .,. FIIII.IMWYYYYiIY' °✓l / N� l(.� rJ 1 � i(///lir, r,,.,,;, Jrr�. O ° r f7 r %rr 1957 1971 vAr 1994 ono 2013 r� � k �� ��arw � r N� ` 64m1f ��r �1I �, 2020 1957 and 1971 aerials from USGS Earth Explorer. 1994,2013,and 2020 aerials from NYSGIS Cleannghouse. Prepared By: Land Use Ecological Services,Inc. Project VEGETATED DUNE LIMIT 570 Expressway Drive South,Suite 2F For. MKS Realty,LLC l in 9 a4'l 11' Lai SeMedford,NY 11763 At: 1925 North Sea Dr.,Southold,NY 0 51,1 100 200 SCTM #1000-54-4-20 11 u' Date: 12/2/2022 Revised: Scale:As Noted I Exhibit 3 Construction Design Management and Advisory Services 2100 Joshua's Path ` Hauppauge, NY 11788 Phone: (631) 675-6214 Fax: (631)675-0364 n E CE ry December 2, 2022 Attn: Ms. Elizabeth Cantrell DEC - ? 2022 Town of Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: Single family Residence (20-00153) MKS REALTY, LLC. 1925 North Sea Drive At Southold, T/o Southold, NY SCTM No.: 1000-54-04-20 Dear Ms. Cantrell, In accordance with our resubmission, our team again has worked together to update the site plan based on comments from prior Board of Trustees reviews: • We are including the updated proposed site plan depicting changes in the elevations that will occur based on the development of the proposed new dwelling. • We have also included a re-vegetation plan that includes the installation of privacy screening and re-vegetation for all areas affected or disturbed during construction, prepared by Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. • We have clearly depicted on the survey, prepared by Young and Young, along with the additional design drawings prepared by Land Use Ecological Services, Inc., that all conforming plans provided for your review "will entirely establish and maintain as a Non-Disturbance Buffer area along with a proposed 4-Foot-Wide Access Path through the Non-Disturbance Buffer Area" We are again hopeful that the Board of Trustees will maintain our placement on the December Calendar as requested last month, so we may use that time during the hearing to confirm the new placement of the proposed dwelling and provide answers to any other questions the Board may have. We would hope that the Board will allow us to present our arguments with respect to this issue and hopefully reach a resolution at the December 14, 2022, board meeting. Therefore, we have followed the Board of Trustees recommendations and have enclosed one (1) full size set and three (3) reduced copies of the Architectural Drawing Al-1, last dated 12-01-2022, as well as the updated Survey from Young and Young, the Native Planting Plan NP-1 and Project Narrative from Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. for your use. (Hand delivered December 2nd, 2022) Very truly yours, Edward A. Licalzi, President LOT COVERAGE TEST HOLE 400 Ostrander Avenue,Riverh000,New York 11401 t.1.651.-T27.250-5 fox.651.T:2-7.0144 BY WbONAL"6EOSa7ENCE odmin@youngengincering.com PROPOSED DATE:11/20/20 r FRAME HOUSE A GARAGE 3,053 SF EL=5 56 1— — 00* ouq RAISED DECK =1,4845F PALE BROWN POOL =448 5F 'FINE TO Ho—rd W.Young,Lond Surveyor ARSE SAM FRONT ENTRY STAIRS =513 SF W/10% Thomas C,Yiolperl:,Professional Engineer W4 —E DRIVEWAY 3,183 5F &RAVEL Douglas E.Adams,Frofessionol Engineer (SW) � Robert 0.Tost,Architect j TOTAL 8,681 SF 14.7% 6W=165 42 Robert 51;rornskl,Architect WATERTPALE ,-41t BROWN Fr4E S SITE DATA Ua AREA=1.3530 ACRES OR 58,936 5Q.FT- lY 110 zo BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS BOUNDARY LINES SHOWN AS SCALED FROM FLOOD AP PANEL NO 36103CO154 H LAST DATED SEPT.25,2009. INSURANCE RATE M 4f 1) =NAVb(1988) VERTICAL ATUM +9 7 e DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER =4 FT HIGHEST EXPECTED GROUND WATER ELEVATION1.7 NUMBER OF BEDROOMS(DESIGN EQUIVALENT) =4 440 GAL 4 875 MINIMUM REQUIRED IIA OWT5 CAPACITY 500 GAL V- PROVIDED IIA OWTS CAPACITY & & ,sa 90 LEACHING SYSTEM REQUIRED 300 SFSWA 8 2 7 LEACHING GALLEYS PROVIDED 318 SF5WA 431 ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION +851 "I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WATER SUPPLY(S)AND/OR SEWAGE DISPOSAL J19 5e SYSTEM(s)FOR THIS PROJECT WERE DESIGNED BY ME OR UNDER My y y p!- DIRECTION.BASED UPON A CAREFUL AND THOROUGH STUDY OF THE SOIL, +F155 pe 19 ,(�I;Q SITE AND GROUNDWATER CONOTTIONS.ALL FACTUTrFS,AS PROPOSED, e CONFORM To THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES 3 CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS IN EFFECT AS OF THIS DATE-* 6. e, HOWARD W YOUNG,N-Y.S.L.S.NO.45893n op 4 V, THOMAS C WOLPEAT,NYS RE NO 61483 Z1 7 6 ?y 7.4 DOUGLAS E ADAMS,N.Y.S.P-E.NO 60897 �.f� , C 0 0 of�, P x 0 "' N, A.V - 'V 4F .1 cMF 'All SURVEYOR'S CE.RTIFICATION 10� WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE 07 t. WITH THE CODE OF PRACTICE FOR LAND sUAVEYS ADOPTED BY THE NEW YORK + STATE ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS AR 0. Ik 06_ ea HOWARD W.YOUNG,N.Y.S.L.S.NO,45893 ALe 7 lopd SURVEY FOR 61. MKS REALTY, LLC. W,e 0% Q_ 44! A 0 at Southold,Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York 91EALTH DEPARTMENT USE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS 1cr A 6- ..... . BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY TRIBUTARY I VOLUME REQUIR -0 dty 4' 9 DRIVEWAY:3,183 5F x 2J12 x 0.60 318 CF e�. 0 t " " ... . County Tax Map Dt-t 1000 5-- 54 E,a 04 20 ROOF:1,507 SF x 2/12 x 10 =251 CF TOTAL REQUIRED 569 CF FIELD SURVEY COMPLETED NON.25,2020 MAP PREPARED JUN 25,2021 VOLUME PROVIDED ,0 USE LF#1 Record of Revisions DATE (3)10'DIAx3'DEEP bRYWELLS 616 CF REVISION 40 NQtA41- NOV 121,ZW: NOI A t4ML APP.�072C�22 -N "-A-TA TRIBUTARY 2 VOLUME ELWMb /-<, Ge.7 m..2022 ROOF:1,546 SF x 2/12 x LO 258 CF A10 DEC 2 2022 6-A NOV 30,2022 VOLUME PROVIDED USELF#2 (2)10'DIAx3'DEEP bRYWELLS 411 CFti� Southold Town Board of Trustees 30 0 15 30 Scale:V= 30' JOB NO,2020-0153 1 S­1 :IT, METER ,;rZ'VENTILATION PIPE C3fAHRER Volume(gal) INCOMING SERVICE 400 Ostrander Avenue,Riverhead,Nei York IIqOI SCUM r.E_� S&innertWon Dodbet 277 tel.651.12-7-2303 Fox.691.12.7.014-4 luuutmbic Ililmdlafi Chamba 279 V=ICATUD odminpyourgengineerine.com AmVe Cimuct i ftstkm ch"ibot 12'1 15 AMP BREAKER stmipe Chambre 63 r 0"� "�IR 1.177-PuW DisiTifwiDa amber 4 120Y AIC,10,6OHZ,15 AMP PONER SUPPLY /_DIStatII Taw V.1me 749 CYLINDER(OPTIONAL) #12-2 AWG WITH<51,10 IN I"FVC.CONDUIT Howard N,Young,Land Surveyor MAIN Thomas r.Nolpert,Professional Engineer 4'INLET Fi; OUTLET PIPE SPECIFICATIONS SERVICE Douglas E.Adams,Frol`e551onol Engineer PANEL PP/PE FiLLio Rale 32% .A, JA mble.%W4 41, Ing A Robert r-.Tast,Architect Ambic Media PP I Pt Filling Rate[57% HAIZOVqIRE Robert Strom5ki,Architect Blower 2A clim Y _M'N_SERVICE REA-R r1l CA11 F 1�-�A-..�- 15-H'. 5 A117 I AH A IR LFLLir'PUMP Tank FAP INLET WI I — A pipi.� PVC PPI PE T Access Covers PIMIC I CPA Irm Disinfectant(Optional) CbWm TaMes HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE RECIRCULATION -L-1 BAMA Ell f Wjj �,e�AIR INTAKE GROUND S-E RHOMBUS AIR BLOVIER FLOW OPENING(ITP-W 461 anNogn) BCONTROL PANEL PLAN VIEW 11'MANHOLE 111P 4'MANHOLE ELECTRICAL ONE—LINE DIAGRAM 31 ANHOLE 9111`1 CYLINDER(OPTIONAL) Z'UOW OPENING NOTES: DONTACT W-DIA kj I.CONCRETE 4.000 FSI 0 28 DAYS 2.REBAR TO BE A5TM A-615 GRADE 60 5.YIELDED HIRE FABRIC A5TM A-155 4.DESIGNED FOE AA5HTO HS-20 (tiff jt LOADING 5.TOP SLAB AND HALL ARE MONOLITHIC 6.THE 51VEHALL.AREA SHALL BE 4­ EQUAL TO THE FULL EXTERNAL HALL 10"DIA.PIPE KNOCKOUT TOP\11EY4 HEI&HT OFALLEYS THE PRECAST LEALEACHING& EC MEDIA (EACH StM DEC I I A11*1 ASSEMBLY fmmn � pt SECTION A-A VIEW SECTION B-B VIEW F===q emEm=V-1 "�' Southold 1. 4 1 1 FUJISLEAN USA CEN-5 J_EA�CHII,16 HOLE SIDE VIEW (TY-F) END VIEW LEACHING GALLEY NTS ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION FUJI e-LEAK INLET PIPE- "I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WATER 5UPPLY(S)AND/OR SEWAGE DISPOSAL UPSTREAM F CONTROL PANEL MOUNTED NOTE: ALL CONDUITS SYSTEM(S)FOR TKS PROTECT WERE DESIGNED BY ME 00 UNDER My CLEAN-OUI HYE PRESSURE BETWEEN PANEL AND DMEMON.BASED UPON A CAREFLX.AND THORI 5-tUby OF THE SOIL, z TREATMENT TANK MUST BE SITE AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS,ALL FACaXTIES.AS PROPOSED. < HOOD POSTS SEALED 70 PREVENT GAS CONFORM THE SUFFOLKCQUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES UI LU ALARM/CONTROL. -r AS OF THIS DATE." PANEL III BLOWER LEAKAGE INTO PANEL. _D CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS IN EFFEc 9 US CONTROLLER'A" 1 MFG BY SJE RHOMBUS I_,_HEATHER FOR I HIFI COMMUNICATION Mu 5:1�;7AN7 BLOWER DEVICE; Q ENCLOSURE USE ALARM/CONTROL PANEL 1-101-#1041,040 CLEAN-01,T CONTROLLER"0"MFG BY o T_ S�JE RHOMBUS HOWARD W.YOUNG,N.Y.S.LS.NO.45893n THOMAS a WOLPERT,N.Y.S.P.E.NO.614B3 DOUGLAS E.ADAMS,N.Y.S.P.E.NO 80897 A SWEEP MAY BE USED AM LINE TO _1L " 4"' _w�WYE AND OLEANOIJ7 C-LEA4 HT-5 2 STOFIN.GRADE SURVEY FOR FRAME HROUY SE INLET LATERAL TO FUJI CLEAN UNIT ON FILES 5A=AIR VENT CAP a TRIG PFLY MKS REALTY, LLC. MPG BY TUF-TITE SCALE: NTS 5U (4 BEDROOMS) ELECTR;CIAI/ TC BLOWER FFEL=18.50 rM'MiN FROM ANY FUJCLEAN DOOR OR WINDOW) SUPPLY ONTS SPLICE BOX P to sa ter CONTROL PANEL 4 BLOWER at Southold,Town of Southold 4"PVC e 41,FVC 9 4"FVr1& SCALE; NTS Suffolk County,New York 2,00%MIN. 1.00%MINI- 100%MIN- S I RISERS 6 COVERS NOTES BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY 2E WITH SAFETY 1_105 LOCKINC, MFS,BY TUF-71TE OR CA5`711,16 70 THE O^Te SHALL BE YorFL GEN-5 MANUFACTURED By APPROVED EQUAL GRADE FJJCLEAN USA, County T=Map 1000 s,, , 54 BI- 04 20 r--41c� 2.THE DES 6N ENG-WEER,FC-11CLEAN UeA P-_F­RES-=N7A71,'/=_ FIELD SURVEY COMPLETED NOV.25,2020 IF" AND CCDHe REFRE�_E:N`7ATIVES SHA__O--_5ER,/E THE MAP PREPARE[) JUN 25,2021 N�_TALLATION OF T-i-0^7S AND LEAGFIN&SYSTEM. ---Mum cow-COVER TCA-SLAB P=,I��R To BACKFILL. IE=6.5q E'-INT AF--RC\/AL FRCM ALL 7+7RZ- Record of Revisions DATE HOLEVENT 5,THE SYSTEM START L;F WILL 3E COMPLETED UNDER THE REVISION E'OLEE 01. NOV-n.2021 L zR\A5iCN--A FLJCLFAN J5A DIRFt�7'3JF_� -7 NOIR(AFR.20.207.?.) RPA`27 22'2 V CONNECT 3"PVC REPREeENTA7,/E. 11 DATA OCT,14.LNU2 ENT LINE TO•ILN7 SEE DETAIL FOR NOV-_302w HOLE IN ON5T OY-ri­5 COMPONENTS FOUI INVERT- 4-AN F\=CU7=-Z,OFERA7,ON AND MAIN-ENANCE r_ON7RAGT ...... EETVC---N THE MAINTNANGE PROVIDER ANG FFCPER7T' PROVIDE CLEAN OUT AT OWNER"!UST BE 5LjE-MI---F[?TO THE CUFFO_<COUNTY 4'DIA.DISTRIBUTION BOX E�Fp - FACE OF BUILDING BOT EL=3.80 &4r— z- DEPARTMENT OF-iEAL7H S-_RVICFS-(5CDHS)PRIOR TO AP-FO,/AL OF 7+-[:1/A OH-S RES 5T RAT ON BY THE AIR LIKE TO BLOWER-' nI SI-PH5 IN AGr.CRDANr.E WITH ARTICLE IP OF THE SIJ==OLIK HIGHEST EXFECTED&H 21L-L7 .�.OJNTY SANITARY CODE 500 GAL.I/A ONT5 MDL.CENI_5 MFG.BY FU-ICLEAN MA 5,FINISHED F­LCCR ELE,/ATION(e;TG BE VERIFIED 13�THE PROVIDE END CAP LEVELING DEVICE SANITARY LEACHINO&ALLEY ARCH T.CT MPL05L-4 MF6 BY TUF-TrrE OR TOTAL OF(4)GALLEYS APPROVED EQUAL FOR ALL 5113 SF5KA JOB NO,2020-0153 DISTRIBUTION BOX OUTLET PIPES '/ DWG.2020_0153_bp ZONING INFORMATION PROPOSED PLOT PLAN SITE PLAN LEGEND ZONING CALCULATIONS L O Fol G I S L A N D S O U N PROPOSED BUILDING DISTRICT R-40 REQUIRED SECTION TOTAL PROVIDED LOT SIZE 40,000 S.F. 280 ATCH 1:1 58936.00 ST CONFORMS TEST HOLE THE LINE ALONG APPROXIMATE ® SILT FENCE LOCATION LOT WIDTH 150.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 20050 FT_ CONFORMS BY McDONALD GEOSCIENCE HIGH WATER MARK AS LOCATED R TAkAH LOT DEPTH 175.00 FT 280 ATCH 3:1 296.57 Ff. CONFORMS DATE:05111/06 BY US ON 1 11251�^O RPS FRONT YARD 50.00 Ff. 280 ATCH 3:1 38.90 Ff. NON-CONFORMS �-B� _O O LIMB LINE OF WORK 65pp JD+I[HO NFNPIKE AVERAGE FRONT YARD SETBACK 38.90 FT_ 38.90 Fr. CONFORMS SUITE IW STOSG.1-NY 11791 SIDE YARD 15.00 FT 280 ATCH 3:1 16.00 Ff. CONFORMS PALE BROWN G B TEL(510.9 111-4667 AGGREGATE SIDE YARD 35.00 Fr. 280 ATCH 3:1 53.83 Ff. CONFORMS copse 440 28159E 200,041 EA%:;N6 7Pa-5TH REAR YARD 50.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 225.00 FT. CONFORMS _ SAND - _- RUDO PPH S WT A1Y PSL (SW) - __ -4 Nr■WJSL mm MAXIMUM PERMITTED DIMENSIONS: Gw..1.65 4.9 LOT COVERAGE 2D%(11,767-20 S.F.) 280 ATCH 3:1 14%(8,180.9 FT-) CONFORMS WATER IN BUILDING HEIGHT 35.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 35.00 Ff CONFORMS PALE BROWN NUMBER OF STORIES 2112 280 ATCH 3:1 2 CONFORMS FINE TO - --- - ._. - COARSE SAND 0 FIRST FLOOR AREA: (`''� ' PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR 2,4011 S.F. 1 T.O' U. BEACH `o � PROPOSED FRONT ENTRANCE IMPERVIOUS 4981 SF, _ (A) L 3 � - - PROPOSED GARAGE 591.6 S.F. - - - "'- " PROP.FIRST FLOOR EXT.DECK 1.284 9 S.F. 0 L_ 9 2) l PROP.POOL 448.0 S.F. 1 FLOOD BOUNDARY LINE ___�« C 't MEZZANINE FLOOR AREA: ZONE VE(EL-16 AS SCALED FROM FLOOD ---• - (A Q Ir 1` n�RJxs r �a PROPOSED MASTER BEDROOM 676.5 S.F. -•,y ) INSURANCE RATE MAP - _ I ra TE . 0 RK1411111D. SECOND FLOOR AREA: 2,2195 S F. - _ �• Z�YE(EL-13 --'................�_�. I O � (� IT 6 A+tAµlar or vzmr..]1J EDGE OF BEACH GRASS y- - 3 11 % �� COMPLETE FLOOR AREA TOTAL (D AW AMt NO 01117M W A 5,888.7 S.F. --'�'-_ �' L' _ 0 mei Nor N - F AW um m m rusa"k 0a N Amt of LOT COVERAGE-BREAKDOWN e{ `�~~��� - s1a■.0 sN uro-uo m A DWELLING(WOOD FRAME) 2,449.9 S.F. 1o' ' K how RAISED DECK 1,284.9 S F. r* G $ >' sN� POOL 448.0 S.F. ^ a �`b -f r`•'�•_-.-_-�� PROPOSED 4'WIDE PATH r* Y/ 0 �'°a ,.__'q• k VEGETATIONSITED THRU. OF MIN. FRONT ENTRY STEP SYSTEM 498.1 S.F. H1 �� •_ -'M1--�•- "-�- ----_-���` -�-- --�__- ~--�-' � (JF ENTIRE SUBJECT LOT IS ■ DRIVEWAY G - �-------.-- .__J' MAINTAINED AS D 3,500.0 S.F. 3 �� ✓_ MAINTAINED B A 7 � �, � xe�, C D 'NON-DISTURBANCE BUFFER' LOT COVERAGE TOTAL (14%)8,180-9 S.F 3�3 IT ® BEACH GRASS AREA WITH A PROPOSED 4' LOT AREA 58.936.00 S.F.. 3 __�-�v- ---��9 �.•t �. _ WIDE ACCESS PATH THRU P''--- -�� " __-J THE TION-DISTURBANCE Ib ' BUFFER"AS INDICATED. AMOUNT OF FILL REQUIRED 470.00 CYPOOL EQUIPMENT (FILL TO BE CLEAN BANK-RUN SAND AND GRAVEL FROM APPROVED UPLAND SITE) LOCATED UNDER DECK (GROUND LEVEL) - BUILDING AREA: 2,401.1 SF. - M,- f o FIRST FLOOR DASHED LINE OF ......�-- ___ � N MASTER SUITE FLOOR 678.5 SF. O.H.ABOVE. w�� e� ''•~'-9� -j`�- SECOND FLOOR 2,2195 S F. •} - �o LIMIT OF '� � �'�~~ �� m •'`�` �-- � �$ _ - RESIDENTIAL BACKUP p PROPOSED FILL - ,� y..Nr' `�a } GENERATOR LOCATED Z SCHEDULE FOR OPEN SPACE AS PER 280 ATTACHMENT 6 (APPRO)L 470 CY) 9 �¢s ""11°x"""'°" UNDER DECK i N Q SIZE OF LOT(<I5 AC) 58,936.00 1.35 AC CONFORMS -; t+� _ ^ _ LL F MINIMUM OPEN SPACE 20% 000.0 S.F. CONFORMS PIER LINE IN ACCORDANCE W/BD. - J MINIMUM SET BACK 30 0000 FT CONFORMS `+ -- - - f f - ' ! - O O MINIMUM BUFFER 20 000.0 FF. CONFORMS OF TRUSTEES(DECK SPACE) c --- _ - m m m - ...... r^ _$y EXISTING BUFFER TO < UJ PIER LINE IN ACCORDANCE WJBD. e - r ___--_ _ _o OF TRUSTEES(LMNG BPAG e - _ �., ---.+---'°7 . e :. {[1 e.a y f ' REMAIN. W o n o r (n FLOOD INSURANCE RATE PANEL No. 36103CO154H LAST UPDATED: 9.252009 (SEC.275-2.A) /. - -'-rte E J NaA16ED DEc6 . f 1r ea___�_ ,- --- - Z o o o p (SEC.273-11.C.2.C.1.C) _ _! }e 1>a __d___- V �..I - �/ 0 a F E. W SUBJECT LOT: 1925 NORTH SEA ROAD,SOUTHOLD g - .. ~.• z -- --3-) PROPOSED POOL m f/) SECTION:54 BLOCK 04 LOT(S):227 --- ZONE VE(EL-13)T ` - a " x 31 PROVIDE ACCESS TO W r m r O ZONING:RESIDENCE'R-00'DISTRICT 1000 -- _�( �EL 112ti. ,n� POOL DRAIN FOR ¢1 o d NOTES I' �" MAINTENANCE. ?�z z z O • ALI.ZONING REFERENCES PER ZONING CODE OF THE LIJ a: 1/ BOUNDARYFLOOD 0 IL TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ! is fa.w s r '` SCALED FROM FLOOLD E AS Z.000 1 ■ THE UNDISTURBED PORTION OF THE SITE SHALL BE -- 9 gip.,-` I 4 ry _ - INSURANCE RATE MAP PROJECT: MAINTAINED AS A UNDISTURBED BUFFER. ) ,1a.� O1^g 1 =a "'� ,p LJ SFT.DIA.x 4F7. REVISIONS 1. I, I � - 1 1 j 'r ( e DEEP SWIMMING POOL AVERAGE FRONT YARD - A a 0) (C '1.104, .o �•V ■ 8 '� p BACKWASH SYSTEM. #_ DATE REVISIONS SETBACK(EST.BY In z-1 ' I �� r � � A B r-r 9sAEvt67 ren.>WrevtWR ADJACENT HOMES) a z PROPOSED 1200 GAL. (� UNDERGROUND '" PROPANE TANK SCREENING/EASTERN RED CEDAR �.-_ i ■ +� _..^\ • "¢I 4 r••.2l_R6U670 B1,TRU61EE9 1,775'TO KENNEY'S ROAD ' r . - DRIVEWAY GRAVEL - =. r 1. __._.._..-------.-.----------_. ._..,.. _ -•- �� Dfi[H>=WAY _ ( EDGE OF OUSTING -t\L Sy��°241a01� Q (' a �_• 2a0. - �p �M M.GttiS PANCL RMLrkO ? �� - 16.75(PROP.D1Ycrrru0) (SIDE YARD SFTBACK) PAVEMENT .[+- ��- EDGE E EXISTING PAVEMENT EL:16.68(RAISED DECq-•� d 96.66(T.O.POGL COPING) �� q, y EDP +tom POSTING UNDERGROUND ;fWAT WNE �.�._ _. JJf--- -_�-•r-_. ..^ WATER MAIN NORTH SEA DRIVE PROJECT LIMITING FENCE 6 ISSUE HAYBALES ALONG LIMIT OF DATE COMMENT 6 III Y..J 1r WA),�me 12'TFIK.GUNRE POOL SHELL yJ PROPOSED SITE PLAN CLEARING,GRADING AND V-1 PaocRESSPRNT WALLSAND BASE FORMED t GROUND DISTURBANCE.SEE Mw■ORPPn 5 IN91DA CONCRETE 6TfM WALLi SCALE 1'=20'-O° .. W/VEAl1CAL6 HORIZONTAL 111'''::'777 /� �{,� 1NUZ1 WuDIT;RCOINYML� fO1MtDAT10ND 2 U �_� DETAIL#4/51-2. - l\\ 1 I1�5 •" ~"* ��COMPACTED STRUCTURAL G �I■.NL1 NPL,GRAD( .M. .i ll 4 '1 PILL(RCA) - _I (L ._I� 31 1 PROJECT No 21-350400 o E c - 2 2022 -•----• - :- IB..,.7A■elx GRADE} EL.: A. DATE: 05-DB-21, (ESL GRADEI I DRAWN BY: KJS ( !`} uNE wolcwCHECKED BY: IN .. ._.-._ PROPERLY LINE SCALE: AS SHOWN 2 POOL SECTION -VIEWING NORTH 50utwd TOM Al- SCALE 1/4•=V-0• ®d8rdRL1R1tlC 19 rGYGW,CIm lowq((rAv wnwrN TI I�LNr r■,wmrwx'rRof+m/tc wv m: f'NGU1■P rwirn>'ulra.e sAlNwcerL arrmva 01t it alrrm+iswDcnrnx 11uLr arwmcaRn.1'nl r [!rI■E GaLiR`1 ill WLL b Ia'PNLREiI ffiICMlG p1 AL!AS#LLti1f 1IrAr4G`IIP}Lk2A5 YJIr=•ob JSY • • • � 1 1 ► ► ► s • ■-"ijl �p■■■1 ■ !t•�'+• j�11 r�*y A i r■■t"Wjfw- ■�■I i °e■ e■+►■ r°a► ■ tip,, _.A•- -+Af•r-ar-+•ip■�• ■■ s i !r er ■ ■ia°►t a� 1 1 • ■►►■eV° r' [�j�,■_� ■+�p ■-a y��■ R■ �a ■ "'e. error COW� � %ir��• ■■ °ice °'�i ■ - L+�,�r■1■i�■+ry ■ ■it. "�■ t►■►�■A� L j TR• irlr�e r r i *AF0 i's, %Z ■ � � • • • -• - • . - • ■ ■it ■■ ■i�� !■ I yI//■,t■ ■■�,■ ■i i1�i! ■►■ I�p ■+p r� ■■ p■i■p•'-i!'�� rp„ r►V■ti�■; •pi+�'■,r°■■ �r ►.r■,�■i r ■■�'■■ •°►■■ ■�' ►I +•moi■""°+• • °*■■■■' `A�IS.'-°1�Md_y.r#rAa,•'ya�L�rttr,�!4y,*je.•:.1�dr+,�amrr�3 r"rai#..�wj.�lii,:.r+ri�Y.•R'.aArAi7ri tR■��■p■p�■q-�■ r��tvIFlip°A■■1°r'e■■*a■I�af N•iattuIrr•'a■l Veg#Eetation■to Re■■■mip■iai f�■ne■r■■p ■ — stc °e°°fir 8eaeh rass ■ �■°■■ ■i ■�� ■ i•q L■��Ai,�+�'TnMq��,���. ■•• �a � ':;� Ii ►' >"'�' � ► I i �' is_ �■ � • ■4 t � ■■ rj i i■ris� ■A, ■y,■i, ■■�►■■■■■A�y.■i ■■°■A�p'� '•�� _ • • or■ �`�►a°im • ► ►'r�■ rr■ t■�■ Beach pea i■ # ■rte■ii . - 1 1 ' '. • • -. -4 Opp°4,�, ■peYA►! Sii,A ■" I+��"R�*„rlij°��er■°r�■ y�►■it . • ■ i ■■ It �i°'M I ■i� F�'UgOSa r�5@ r.y, l � '..�.SAn• ■ r ■� r��■+gR„■'moi ■ a ■ ■i ■ ■■■ C*aastal anis r855 4�„p��i • M■°%i I • •". . • . " a■i°■�,,Aa�■er■°i ►"'e�aq a° ►ib■ I� is °iene.� +v�' •rte° >s .� .. °s■ ■i,• p°i■,si�rye ■_°i it °■ ia■ar■ ■ �r ■ Narthem hay erry. s s $ a, sr;■r■p I -, • _ - . - °�i°a�■ •s;�■�aAa °�� A—Ma-Ar"�Ma-Ar"� �� Baster�a redo y ar . :�:'r,, •,�•s r�■�+■ "�' • • • • • ..�.�� A ■rr° '�■ ■ate° a°i I■ Iv■ r�4► j Blaek c#�e ° °�� • • ■ ■■aa,iMfg, . . �� �.•,� ■�,�■,���ri i,, a P r, ■pry■� + ip■d • •• - • • - .. - • 11 • •• ��y■$'�■,'yiayi°i" -°■r°�ral'rr■�■■■ �,,rA� '�■►° r rr■" +iir eir • ■' ■ A�- ���, • - •. - • •- - IS °'�i / ■ ��'yi�, �0 d0 a?t+�'�■ ��•+ ■° •■R ■'►� l; t� .1•r - Ip ■ ' 6i•#. + �1' . • _ • • w 4 it-, ay'r $� �n� Ly •■M■r�1 iI�`� ��I� a Via. �t �� �� !p • __ ' / I ' i I • • • • 1 • ■+r!• ga►riar°a R. 7 *•IJyr#,� �° °�r� nr° or*�r'°•te°e ■y Slow to • • / ►■r'■■�r ■w°�'�. 'r� a ®G ■ ■ee CA„+►■■Tari ■�rp°rr °+■fir#■,� iu .,rig°°�+�,r ■■■i a° pi!� A. -,pill�p°° �a V ■ ■ I r■►■►i ■i°��■ i ra ■ ! A•■ ■y ? Ci ■i i ■i rt1■ v� • t,_ ■ ■■■ Rr ■R �I ■ic ° i, ■i �� rx ► r °a ! # ass ri ra trp - •At■r ,� p t€�q,�A•,�� � °++x'�i � ■iy�'�i�'+.�,pra�■�■rI■����■`irf■�� ■■fit '-� •9 ,1. • ■x I ■ ■M■i ► L'■►/S'C 1� xhr3 'i# i ►t1•► i►ry_ y� hjtq! •1■■A j'tili�l � ■ E1•■$ i /i i • . • • " • • –9. A. ■q���`,Yq'y r .i `ar� ■ ■�7 °i°■ M#btr bf ■�M■i� ■ 1/�i■iAi �1 • . •• tg, #1 'A•: - 7 � 144 r' R;334 •tR■ !F$ i ■■r�►Ip t■/1 ■ 1 ■ Ii • • i r! � iI isf�►■ �►° i■1i■1/►►■y -_ • --• / I • I I ./ . /. , I • °a+`' I �$ qeAa�� '' °■"is '' •ytii+■■Aai+c•i' i►►�fsa■■ aril ■ °� _ 4 Ak • • fi 7. A +Y 1■^ A¢ ■ ■ ►Ip py` pr • •• " • •. " • ■r •:■# $ i i •+'rte; �e--I■ i+•`� �r4�a � ) ■ p 1 1 •. • • • • 9�b d i . i • • • . " • i • ..•. ► MAW ■ • DECK ■ • • E C E l y E PROPOSED �, , •. : •• FPAME HOUSE • • • •' • • . • 178 . • f • {- i • -• PERVIOUS • • • •• 8,L PANP_ �i • •• •. • "• • • • • • -•. '• • • • �•• •• �• i. .•Prepared By: Land Use Ecological lei-vices, Inc.1 1 • • • • •. Project: NATIVE PLANTINGPLAN 570 Expressway Z-1 Drive South, S�uite 2F For: MKS Realty, LLC Medford. NY H 76') At: 1925 North Sea Dr., Southold, NY Use .,�.• ■ ■ . ■ • ' ■ SCTM 41000 1 �. 1 • - -• 01 -1 • ECQIQryICdl Scr+�sas, inc.. MKS Realty, LLC 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold I SCTM#1000-54-4-20 Project Purpose and Need The purpose of this project is the development of the last existing vacant lot within the developed neighborhood north of North Sea Drive as a single family residence. The residence is proposed in line with or landward of the existing line of development. The site approximately 1.35 acres, and is zoned residential R-40. This use is compatible with current zoning as well as the existing character of the neighborhood. Description of Proposed Activities The property owner is proposing a single family dwelling with accessory decks, pool, stairs/landings, innovative/alternative onsite wastewater treatment system(I/A OWTS), stormwater management system, and gravel driveway. A breakdown of the size of each proposed structure is provided on the Survey/Site Plan, as well as in the table below. ((� �J] E Proposed Structure Size(SF) Lot U E C E 0 V Covera e Dwelling 3,053 5.2 Deck 1,484 2.5 D F c — 2 2022 Pool 448 0.8 Front Stairs/Landings 513 0.9 Southold Town Gravel Driveway 3,183 5.4 Board of Trustees TOTAL 8,681 14.7 The project has been designed to maximize setbacks to Long Island Sound (> 213 feet),the beach(> 100 feet), the dune/beach ridge crest (> 30 feet), and the landward limit of the dune/beach ridge (> 2 feet). Structures are proposed on piles and elevated to meet current FEMA requirements for a VE El. 13 flood zone per map #36103C0154H (effective 9/25/2009). Structures will also be designed in accordance with standards set forth in ASCE/SEI 24-14, Flood Resistant Design and Construction, for construction in coastal high hazard areas. These standards have been adopted by NYS and the Town within their respective building codes. Wastewater will be treated with an I/A OWTS proposed in the southwest corner of the site and sized in accordance with Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) residential standards. This I/A OWTS will reduce nitrogen loading to groundwater and surface waters when compared with traditional sanitary systems, and is the preferred environmental alternative for development in sensitive areas. Stormwater from a 2 inch rainfall event will be treated and stored in drywells proposed throughout the site. Pool backwash water will also be treated and stored in a drywell specific to that purpose. Approximately 200 feet (width) of beach and dune habitat will be preserved with this project, through establishment of a variable width natural and undisturbed buffer seaward of development activities. The buffer is 100-120 feet wide within the vegetated dune, and an additional 90-100 feet wide within the existing beach habitat. Areas of disturbance will be planted with native vegetation in accordance with the Native Planting Plan. Trees to be planted along the property edges include Eastern red-cedar (Juniperus virginiana) and post oak (Quercus stellata). Shrubs to be planted include bayberry (Morella pensylvanica) and beach plum (Prunus maritima). Herbaceous species to be planted and seeded include American beach grass Project Narrative 12/2/2022 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold 1/3 (Ammophila breviligulata), coastal panicgrass (Panicum amarum), and seaside goldenrod (Solidago sempervirens). All of these species are currently found within vegetated areas of the property. For protection of adjacent properties, natural areas, and Long Island Sound, areas of disturbance will be contained with a perimeter silt fence installed in accordance with NYSDEC and Town standards for fence height and embedment. Silt fence shall be installed prior to the start of any construction activities, shall be maintained for the duration of construction, and will be removed after final stabilization of the site is achieved. Existing Ecological Conditions The subject property is undeveloped and largely undisturbed. The northern third of the site is unvegetated beach habitat to the property boundary at mean high water. The central third of the site is a vegetated dune habitat with herbaceous species that include beach grass (Ammophila breviligulata), beach pea (Lathyrus japonicas), coastal panicgrass (Panicum amarum), common reed(Phragmites australis, sparse), and salt hay(Spartina patens, sparse and in upland); a large patch of Rugosa rose (Rosa rugosa); and some bayberry (Morella pensylvanica) [Exhibit 1, Photos]. The southern third of the site contains patchy shrubs, including bayberry and beach plum (Prunus maritima); and patchy trees including Eastern red-cedar (Juniperus virginiana) and post oak (Quercus stellata). Herbaceous vegetation in the southern third of the site is sparse, mainly coastal panicgrass. Along the road edge, non-native and invasive species such as black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) and autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellate) mix with post oak and eastern red-cedar. Little blue stem (Schizachyrium scoparium) is also present along the road edge. Existing Dune Conditions Site topography was utilized for mapping of dune features by the surveyor. The location of the crest of dune/beach ridge is indicated as coincident to the highest recorded elevations, moving landward from the beach area, prior to sloping downward. The location of the landward toe of the dune/beach ridge was developed from a combination of following the methodology of the Bombara(adjacent west) application, as well as the grades and vegetation spanning between the two adjacent developed properties. Beach and Dune Change Over Time The shoreline along North Sea Drive is stable. Aerial photographs were utilized to digitize the dry beach in 1957, 1971, 1994, 2013 (post-Sandy), and 2020 (Exhibit 2, Aerial Timeline). As demonstrated by aerials going back 65 years, the beach is stable, with fluctuations of 5-15 feet between 1957 and 1994. The beach was at its narrowest in 2013, following Superstorm Sandy in October 2012, and has accreted 40-65 feet in the vicinity of the subject property since 2013. Based on 2020 aerials and the site survey,the dry beach area is currently at its widest since 1957. In addition to dry shoreline, the general limit of dune vegetation was digitize from aerial photographs in 1957, 1971, 1994, 2013, and 2020 (Exhibit 3, Vegetated Dune Limit). The vegetated dune has actually expanded seaward (i.e. north) 50-57 feet at the subject property since 1957. Similar to the dry shoreline, the vegetated dune is currently at its widest/most seaward since 1957. Based on this analysis, the site at 1925 North Sea Drive is stable, with no significant coastal erosion occurring to the beach or dune in the past 65 years for which this analysis was performed.North Sea Drive has undergone residential development along its length during this time; residential development has not affected the beach and dune system, as evidenced by the analysis per t Project Narrative 12/2/2022 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold DEC /3 2 2022 property, preserving 23,100± SF of vegetated dune and the entire beach, is therefore not anticipated to negatively impact these protective features. Alternatives Considered Alternatives considered include No Action and construction of alternate structure design,sizes,and layout. No Action does not achieve the goal of the project to provide a single family residence for the owner, and was therefore dismissed. There have been several iterations of site layouts presented for this project, including alternative sizes and configurations of the various structures, locating the structures seaward, and proposing a catwalk and gazebo over the dune. Based on analysis and feedback received from the Town of Southold, the dwelling was reconfigured and relocated as far landward as possible to maximize wetland and dune setbacks and to maximize preservation of natural habitat. The catwalk and gazebo was also removed for protection of the existing natural dune. Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures Proposed to Reduce Impacts Mitigation measures proposed with this project include preservation of an approximately 200-foot wide buffer as natural beach and dune habitat,planting of disturbed areas with native vegetation, installation of an I/A OWTS to reduce nitrogen loading to groundwater and surface waters, and installation of a stormwater management system to treat and store runoff prior to discharge to Long Island Sound. As a result of these changes to the project design and proposed mitigation and protection measures, there are no impacts anticipated to adjacent properties. Runoff will be contained onsite with the stormwater management system. Adjacent properties will be screened with native vegetation in accordance with the Native Planting Plan. Proposed development is in line with or landward of the line of development for the north side of North Sea Drive, including the adjacent properties. The Town of Southold has documented shorebird nesting between McCabe's Beach and Kenny's Beach, where this stretch includes the beach on and north of the site. Specifically, the Town has documented piping plovers (Charadrius melodus) nesting on this stretch of beach; plovers prefer to nest on the unvegetated beach landward of mean high water during the months of April—August. Due to the existing residential development along this stretch of North Sea Drive, the landward design of this residence proposed in line with or landward of the existing development and> 100 feet landward of their preferred beach habitat, and the proposed natural buffer, there are no impacts anticipated to nesting plovers or their preferred beach habitat. Development is proposed approximately 40 feet landward of the dune crest, and will impact existing vegetation on the back dune. However, impacts are minimized by project design, which maximizes preservation of natural areas and proposes native vegetation in areas of disturbance. As a result of these design and preservation features, impacts on the function of the dune as a protective feature are not anticipated. D EE P W E DEC - 2 2022 Southold Tarn Board of Trustees Project Narrative 12/2/2022 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold 3/3 • 111 1 �M1 •v ,Vv- ti wr P r. -�.' ' �h �•.����,-�: `*1 c's. '' s 1 c��w :� �,'. � i�s� � _ cg'�3.; �' ;n�+,�„yt�. 1x # F�,. •� � "� t ':'�+'r fi >_ «.S� s 3TC � b�.�,�, Ji� �.�K ; 2� r� n,. r .- �'rr'• ''.���'`Fvr�A�,� ,,�`n ...y+- - " �. _ ��� 4. ° wry TM ' _. i ' • -. � 111 � � 1 r • r, ��ni�P� ,i ;• „y, _ �=Y ,. -fes} ��i r�?�5;�'�5f." .. n. _.I.e ,, � � r"fit �.� 4 •,.;. �• ,� ,. � 1 � �; �.'. 4 '.gym &.e` � � ti';4. 'P =.F •c � �.. 1 �� � � �i� _�'r'4s` �,. �f k •�'. 7 ti:�.'�JR y 1-�` '�' .' ... -... .� + � - rja�r ��cj^ •r, "�*'�ti�i •K�; xOyp-H yU � �y.�S �i- t�S� yy .�� �F 'x .717 i> •�J� r +r — _ ♦- y _ / , _ 2 ' '.F F• •� , �d .. !n �. tik{`k^+�!%g�..;�',•;f P�_ V�yV f 5�; 1f }.�{ s - - L - `ac,S� x � �•{� � J 4, r.-! ft.-.f � � ,;,yF a cti�4a{�� -1.,� �,� }r }K t f t ip,ad •:s � AM y��l.-'� :.'.�F��ix�'', Y 1n `�`�� �� � ^ �,Jt1k'�•J ` '� �v � ':' � ^c�,4'Y tr y�fI `•4 h ,�y•�. >. 4 ,i a f "•rX s��C °�r��w 1r �'tst _*• V ��.�.15'f���}�Y 4t mak. ��� WN •ai�..,.•..f..r i ,n- �: r �eTb r V��Sww�`�' 's }' '• �.. ,f'kl,��}73 L �,+ - 'FP,.. � � � '`¢ �]e �`• n +K Y� d' S x t,it�• �.r r' -,��x ��Yh„ -, a.a y�''' '«� -v y;rc I r:� � �t�4 � �',y i r..Y;.,s � '•� �]�9. .. t,l $ _ 1- '� ' No -11 }�. i , � . y :i ='� :r rk• 7 .° 'x`' + .• 1'_ `Fc'� F x r. ` r �,.. =71 >E� fr. oaf P��. j�Y a _ �r'• '� ' ��.�.' f s-�','� L� �•� � �{` . Y • • -. � 111 � � 1 .t I' ' _ r 9 r fj J 1 � 'a^ti.•Fa �` f ♦1'�,df a �) ��sy"- k _ _ �r r„ ,k .{( � �' • �' �•r•' f•� _ Y '-1 ����+�_� + 1'� r� .'T�i� � -H i2�f�: 1�"` t'+��,:, �A_.. fyirV7 � �i t�� _� '.•k�a ;�, .•.4Zy-s i�' y rx+ L ! � ;" f k �N�•p aSl��ily'# 'S! r 4 ,�' ""ia'L�,!'�`,� L � �' ry "�1`'. �, � j�}c,� `� •~ }, x,. � y ,�� �s�•�,Rp Ny �e'{�ZI� ''s.rw,,.� `�c��.�,i �+d.'-7r�:i� .,1+ r,f`•�'yk y� � rT,lcr.i, •�'�j� Y., ��-"� �`. �•� c:�•�q °'-_ yam' Vii,J '�• - 3 W,44 I• , r st A "W-1010 s - n �. )a 4w _ ,' 0 0 A L 1 4 �1- ' Y Y R ly l R f •1 10 _ Adzr r _ i d '.'W p NEC - 2022 Southold Town oraruslefts =34F` 0 r-{: .s.. 1957 ';" 1971 1994 ',. -. 41 n(o 2013 2020 1957 and 1971 aerials from USGS Earth Explorer. 1994,2013, and 2020 aerials from NYSGIS Clearinghouse. Prepared By: Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. Project: DRY SHORELINE CHANGE -I- 1 in= 150 ft 570 Expressway Drive South, Suite 2F For: MKS Realty, LLC LandUse Medford, NY 11763 At: 1925 North Sea Dr., Southold, NY 0 50 100 200 SCTM #1000 - 54 - 4 - 20 ft �"'�" Date: 12/2/2022 1 Revised: Scale: As Noted Exhibit 2 5' r SITE a INV -�- �rr;' 'rte I • "1F •,�5 �'�� r��2.�:- k � T -Fay UO lift" r _ r--\ rp rf;� "i rp r—,"\ o DEC - P 2022 Board of Trustees Y_ Limit of Vegetated Dune 1957 t ` r W 1971 _ 1994 2013 2020 1957 and 1971 aerials from USGS Earth Explorer. 1994,2013,and 2020 aerials from�NYSGIS Clearinghouse.. Prepared By: Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. Project: VEGETATED DUNE LIMIT �/� 570 Expressway Drive South, Suite 2F For: MKS Realty, LLC 1 in= 150 ft LandUse At: 1925 North Sea Dr., Southold, NY Medford, NY 11763 0 50 100 200 SCTM #1000 - 54 - 4 - 20 ft60Date: 12/2/2022 1 Revised: Scale: As NotedI I Exhibit 3 JOSEPH J. BURRASCANO JR. DONA BURRASCANO Bog 987, Southold NY 11971 Page 1 of 3 22 2 E 15 October 18, 2022 R OUT' ,w I U Southold Town, Board of Trustees �, ,,,,, ,,, Southold Town Hall Annex ld 4375 Main Rd. Board S1 MISM, P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 RE: Opposition to MKS building proposal, 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold Dear Trustees, The site plan of the proposed dwelling to be located at 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold, dated October 17, 2022, depicts structures that must not be built as they are in violation of Chapter 148, Town of Southold,Flood Damage Prevention. Specifically, section 148-2 states "...the Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider the danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the injury of others. If the proposed development may result in physical damage to any other property, no permit shall be issued." According to FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), Flood Zone VE ("coastal high- hazard area")has "Potential for structural damage due to wave action, with the possibility of spread of debrisalong the beach into the water, and onto adjoining properties." Therefore according to the Trustees' own published rules, any structure proposed to be built in FEMA flood zone VE should not be permitted. I refer you to the Landscape Site Plan submitted on October 17, 2022 (reproduced below). It clearly shows that the following are sited in FEMA Flood Zone VE: At least half of the entire structure of the house, plus associated decking, stairs, drywells, swimming pool, swimming pool equipment, generator, walkways, vegetation and fill. I further refer you to a recent FEMA flood zone map of this area(inserted below). It is in agreement with the submitted landscape site plan and confirms that the bulk of the structures, including the house itself would be within flood zone VE. The argument that construction behind an ill-defined"pier line" should be allowed is irrelevant in light of the obvious and clearly stated violations of rules mentioned above. In addition, according to chapter 148-13, "The applicant shall provide at least the following information, where applicable." Subsection G goes on to state, "A technical analysis, by a licensed professional engineer, if required by the local administrator,which shows whether .............. JOSEPH J. BURRASCANO JR. DONA BURRASCANO Box 987, Southold NY 11971 Page 2 of 3 proposed development to be located in an area of special flood hazard may result in physical damage to any other property."This requirement is consistent with Trustee chapter 148, cited above, and the FEMA definition of Flood Hazard Zone VE. There is no record of this having been performed for this site. LONG ISLAND SOUND , " . LIZ—W3tlkCb IUN .✓^ w" I r A a NORTH SEA DRIVE " �';`,v�zwanrcnArAeaaawsnn,waw Applicant's Proposed Landscape Plan, dated October 17, 2022 Note the location of the boundary of flood zone VE R E C E El nSouthq1d'T0'wn �c�ara� st JOSEPH J. BURRASCANO JR. DONA BURRASCANO Bog 987, Southold NY 11971 Page 3 of 3 75,51, / /r y k / d� 1 A y Ny-Suffolk Map: FEMA Flood Zone Date rendered: 03/21/2022 https://www.propertyshark.com/mason/Maps/imagepage.html?map=ny_suffolk&x=0.6348499210110584 &y=0.41371774618220114&zoom=9&basema p=femaflood&tab=themes&xtile=-633&ytile=- 633&xpixel=0&ypixel=0 Note the property in question, outlined. The zone VE as depicted here is in agreement with that shown on the applicant's proposed landscape plan. By comparing the location of the boundary of zone VE to the adjoining properties it is clear that the applicant's proposed structures would be predominantly in flood zone VE. In light of the predictions that climate change will result in an increasing number of stronger storms, and in light of the recent catastrophic damage that resulted from hurricane Ian, construction in coastal flood hazard zones must be prohibited. The Trustee's rules are clear on this and need to be enforced,now more than ever. Thank you for your time and attention. C VE Sincerely EC z0 CT' 1 2022 p ��1. Bu�as � o Jr. Jose Southold'Tr wn Board of"Pl^u-tag . O N � 0 -0 O 7_ S Q O rt CA Z c t v CD tJD p � < p fD O tL i� F� -,i In O O S!1 Q x ti) z 0 0 � = m CD � = v D a � � O N x —I L. in p N z w N e r i�r,ra uh m cry �s c 6 � Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Cantrell, Elizabeth Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 12:39 PM To: 'Tom Wolpert' Cc: Goldsmith, Glenn; Krupski, Nick; Gillooly, Liz; Peeples, Elizabeth; Sepenoski, Eric; pcmoore@mooreattys.com; Ed Licalzi (elicalzi@cmagroupinc.com); Doug Adams; Doris Connolly Subject: RE: MKS Realty, LLC at Southold, T/O Southold, NY Good Afternoon Tom, During the Board of Trustees Work Session held on 10/17/2022, the Board reviewed the revised plans last revised on 10/11/2022 and submitted on 10/17/2022 and have determined that at this time the Board is requesting revisions to the latest proposed plans. Given this request the application is postponed from the October 19, 2022 Public Hearing and will be rescheduled to the December 14, 2022 Public Hearing date (Field Inspection date is December 7, 2022), if the following is submitted: Revised written project description containing all proposed structures with dimensions for each (e.g. do not combine decking areas, please keep each patio/deck/walkway separate), (a) changes made to date, and (b) those forthcoming as per below. The Board is requesting comments on the necessity of several concrete pads located beneath the structure on piles. The Board highly recommends pulling proposed pool landward within pier line. The Board is requesting more information/details about the fill beneath shed on West side of parcel, and if necessary revise on plans. Relocate drywell#1 and #5 landward of proposed structure. • Designate lands seaward of living structure to be a "Non-Disturbance Buffer Area" on plans. • The Board is requesting an updated re-vegetation plan. Senior Office Assistant -Fown, of Southold. Board. of Trustees Office: 631-765-1892 ,mail: elizabetbc@sotttlxoldtowtiny.gov From:Tom Wolpert<TCW@youngengineering.com> Sent: Friday, October 7, 2022 3:18 PM To:Cantrell, Elizabeth<elizabethc@town.southold.ny.us> Cc: Goldsmith, Glenn <glenn.goldsmith@town.southold.ny.us>; Krupski, Nick<nickk@southoldtownny.gov>; Gillooly, Liz <lizg@southoldtownny.gov>; Peeples, Elizabeth <elizabethp@southoldtownny.gov>; Sepenoski, Eric <erics@southoldtownny.gov>; pcmoore@mooreattys.com; Ed Licalzi (elicalzi@cmagroupinc.com) <elicalzi@cmagroupinc.com>; Doug Adams<DEA@youngengineering.com>; Doris Connolly <DAC@youngengineering.com> Subject: RE: MKS Realty, LLC at Southold,T/O Southold, NY Good Afternoon Elizabeth, Please be advised that we are in the process of revising the plans to further address the concerns of the Board and will be submitting the revised plans and revised project description as soon as possible. We understand that all proposed structures shown on the revised plans will need to be re-staked prior to the Board of Trustees field inspection. Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions, please contact us. Tom Tom Wolpert Young&Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead,NY 11901 tcw@vol sp ;Gta 'tt� ; ,t? ;b From: Cantrell, Elizabeth [rnailto:eliza t�"tLic a wrrd.soudthol 9w s : ] Sent:Thursday, October 06, 2022 12:22 PM To:Tom Wolpert<i C�W nun ern irn _f='LD caM> Cc:Goldsmith, Glenn <,gle o�nl'�ri[R ?town,sou,:llholci ny..l: >; Krupski, Nick<nickk southoldtownn y o >;Gillooly, Liz <!2g_!C gLa,l of towny., o >; Peeples, Elizabeth <efiza bethjLpsrt�ithgLcftcL n >; Sepenoski, Eric <arias@.scITnthol(toAu nt goy> Subject: MKS Realty, LLC Good Morning Tom, Regarding the revised plans received on October 4, 2022 for the application referenced above,the Board has reviewed the revised plans last revised 10/4/2022 and determined that the plans do not reflect an accurate pier line. As discussed during the August 9, 2022 and September 7, 2022 field inspections, and during the August 17, 2022 Public Hearings the proposed structures should be no further seaward than the existing living space area, not decking, pools or walkways/catwalks. The most seaward line of a living space area is where the pier line should be taken from. You/The property owner are welcome to submit revised plans at your convenience that depict what the Board of Trustees have requested,or you/the property owner are welcome to request in writing that the Board of Trustees move forward with the current set of plans and re-open the public hearing for a possible determination. If you/the property owner decide to submit revised plans based on the correct pier line, the project will need to be re-staked based on the revised plans for Board of Trustee review prior to field inspections. Sincerely, Senior Office Assistant Town of Southold Board of Trustees Office: 631-765-1892 Email k€ .nlglt r,r k rrwry � .y : 2 Construction Design Management and Advisory Services 2100 Joshua's Path Hauppauge, NY 11788 ° Phone: (631)675-6214 Fax: (631)675-0364 E I'MY October 17, 2022 FRO T 1 7 2022 Attn: Ms. Elizabeth Cantrell Town of Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall Annex BoardId t 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: Single family Residence MKS REALTY, LLC. 1925 North Sea Drive At Southold, T/o Southold, NY (20-00153) SCTM No.: 1000-54-04-20 Dear Ms. Cantrell: In accordance with your email addressed to Tom Wolpert dated October 13, 2022, our team again has worked the entire weekend to revise and update site plan accordingly; • Despite the fact that the Cat-Walk's use in this condition was designed to protect potential erosion and/or disturbing the natural features to access the beach, as per the Board of Trustees request, it is now removed. • As per the direction from the Board of Trustee's Field Inspection on September 7'h 2022, it was made clear that the placement of the new dwelling would need to be placed landward of a "Pier Line" that is clearly not indicated in any part of your town code. The Definition of that term was indicated by your letter of October 6, 2022 which speaks specifically about locating the proposed dwelling using the your definition of a "Pier Line" relating to existing living space on adjacent lots, not decks or pools or walkways/Cat-walks. It is clear that the adjacent properties decks and in the case of the property to the west, the pool and deck would be considered by the boards definition also seaward of their definition of a "Pier Line". Again there seems to be inconsistences with respect to the use of a line that is not currently defined in the use or placement of a new dwelling. We would hope that the Board will allow us to present our arguments with respect to this issue and hopefully reach a resolution at the October 19, 2022 board meeting. • With respect to your concerns as to whether or not there is to be a proposed retaining wall for the proposed pool, is in question. We have provided a cross section of the pool area to clarify the proposed development along the easterly side yard. The pool is constructed of reinforced gunite that could be described as a retaining wall and therefore we have provided that information for clarity. It's been placed temporarily on the site plan for reference. We can further discuss this and provide additional information as needed. • We are including the plot plan that provides the existing topography and the updated proposed site plan depicting changes in the elevations that will occur based on the development of the proposed new dwelling. • We have also included a re-vegetation plan that includes the installation of privacy screening and re-vegetation for all areas affected or disturbed during construction. • We have clearly depicted on the site plan that "The site in its entirety will be established and maintained as a Non-Disturbance Buffer area along with a proposed 4-Foot-Wide Access Path through the Non-Disturbance Buffer Area" • We have clearly depicted that the Proposed Structure is constructed on Pile Foundations. We are again hopeful that the Board of Trustees will maintain our placement on the October Calendar as requested last month, so we may use that time during the hearing to confirm the new placement of the proposed dwelling and provide answers to any other questions the Board may have. Therefore, we have followed the Board of Trustees recommendations and have enclosed one (1) full size set and three (3) reduced copies of the Architectural Drawing Al-1 and L1-0 last dated October 17, 2022, for your use. (Hand delivered October 17, 2022) Very truly yours Edward A. Licalzi, President E T 1 7 2022 Southol!d Vio �Sqard 2LTnM, 21 Page ZONING INFORMATION PROPOSED PLOT PLAN ZONING CALCULATIONS SITE PLAN LEGEND I, L O NG ISLAND SOUND ,DISTRICT°R-40, REQUIRED SECTION TOTAL PROVIDED PROPOSED BUILDING LOT SIZE 40,000 S.F. 280 ATCH 1:1 58,936,00 S.F. CONFORMS TEST HOLE THE LINE ALONG APPROXIMATE LOT WIDTH 150.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 200.00 FT, CONFORMS BY MODONALD GEOSCIENCE HIGH WATER MARK AS LOCATED ® SILT FENCE LOCATION LOT DEPTH 175.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 296,.57 FT.. CONFORMS DATE:05/11/06 FRONT YARD 50.00 FT., 280 ATCH 3:1 38.56 FT. NON-CONFORMS BY US ON T I Me/20, AVERAGE FRONT YARD SETBACK 38,90 FT. 36.90 FT, CONFORMS EL=6.4s' O-a LIMIT LINE OF WORK SIDE YARD 15,.00 FT 280 ATCH 3:1 17.00 FT. CONFORMS PALE BROWN 050011A�GN0 w l 1rr AGGREGATE SIDE YARD 35.00 FL. 280 ATCH 3:1 54.83 FT,. CONFORMS FINE TO N40'28'59"E 11r1n COARSE 200.04' ' ` "r� REAR YARD 50.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 225,AO FL CONFORMS SAND OWI MAXIMUM PERMITTED DIMENSIONS: GW=1,65' 40 GE 20%(11,78Z20S,F.) 280 ATCH 3:1 15%(8,289��8FT.J CONFORMS LOT COVERAGE P FENS TO BROWN ---.._. ._ ,.._....,..°....,..„.. «..... .,.., .,....»......-.......,....,.... , WATER IN BUILDING HEIGHT 35.00 FT.. 260 ATCH 3:1 35.00 FT,. CONFORMS 3-^ NUMBER OF STORIES 21/2 280 ATCH 3:1 2 CONFORMS CS WDE ""'�^`^^•�..-.®„ ,Y,«. w m ,_,«,� 0 FIRST FLOOR AREA. 01 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR 2,594,8 S,F, 11.0 01 � PROPOSED FRONT ENTRANCE IMPERVIOUS 573.8 S°F, PROPOSED GARAGE 538.3 S.F.. # `.._W_.„,,,.._.......__..._..»».,..«.,,.,,,.,.,_...,,,_.._..W,„,..,....._�.q�,. BEACH ro ` �.,.... PROP.FIRST FLOOR EXT,DECK 1,023.2 S.F. M cc FLOOD BOUNDARY LINE MEZZANINE FLOOR AREA: Z "^ 0 r ,«AVE(EL-13) AS SCALED FROM P Dm-,., ...._.,�.....„ .,..,...,�...,...,........„..,,�.,..,,,,, .......�..,,, 0 tta RAs Nc RI rww a PROPOSED MASTER BEDROOM 772..0 ST, INSURANCE RATE SECOND FLOOR AREA: 2,101.8 S..F, ZONE ---»-, � 0 �A E(pApAl�. EDGE OF BEACH GRASS COMPLETE FLOOR AREA TOTAL 5,468.6 SF, ,, ,,„_ ED a EE .° .. AN LOT COVERAGE-BREAKDOWN ..,«...,«,.........W,,..,..-,_. ._. _.....m.°.. .„._._.._,»,.,, ....�.,�._...__...... .. ...m�.w........... 5% 0 167 fw%za 0 0 rE RDWELLING AISED DECK FRAME) 2,594.8 S,.F. (fl (D - 1,023.2 S.F. POOL 510.0 S i GAZEBO 127,9 S.F. .___..............._7.._��. x --------., .., v mE�e awl.At GAZEBO STORAGE 110.6 S,F, I+ ENTIRE SUBJECT LOT IS , CATWALK 203,6 S,F. «---,�. �� " �..,�.._..,°„_ �N IT- ESTABLISHED AND FRONT ENTRY STEP SYSTEM 573,8 S.,F_ -gyp __,., „••, _,- ,� „„°e_._. ,»„•,,.,,,,-...,,..,„,.____ - ..,�,_ -'^•--�� MAINTAINED ASA DRIVEWAY + 3,145,9 S.F. _ �� - --''" 'NON-DISTURBANCE BUFFER" 7 x x _ 0 3 = �, 4pJ AREA WITH A PROPOSED 4' LOT LOT COVERAGE TOTAL (15%)6,289.8 S..F.. 0 aa (D """h'' BEACH GRASS x� WIDE ACCESS PATH NCE �� �. \ � THE"NON-DISTURBANCE o , AREA 58,936.00 S.�F� -✓I' BUFFER'AS INDICATED. � � x AMOUNT OF FILL REQUIRED 470.,.00 �CY,. x as�+ (FILL TO BE CLEAN BANK-RUN SAND AND GRAVEL FROM APPROVED UPLAND SITE) s POOL EQUIPMENT x x s x x LOCATED UNDER DECK BUILDING AREA: R1 Yr a (GROUND LEVEL) FIRST FLOOR 2,594,.6 S.F ( BFT.DIA.x 4FT. $ DASHED LINE OF x MASTER SUITE FLOOR 772.5 S. O.H.ABOVE. x "" s x DEEP SWIMMING POOL F SECOND FLOOR 2,101,6 S.F„ (( x x '3 �� x BACKWASH SYSTEM. LIMIT OF RESIDENTIAL BACKUP SCHEDULE FOR OPEN SPACE AS PER 280 ATTACHMENT 6 PROPOSED FILL x u GENERATOR LOCATED o r MINIMUM USIZE OF LOFT BACK) 530936,00 000.035 AC CONFORMS S.F. CONFORMS APPROX.470 C x ��� ''�' x. x PROPOSED 2' 100 PIER LINE IN ACCORDANCE W/BD. E..w 3 CL MINIMUM OPEN SPACE 20% 000.0 S. CONFORMS ( ) 8 ( INDIGENOUS SCREENING F w W '� MINIMUM BUFFER 20 000.0 FT. CONFORMS OF TRUSTEES DECK SPACE PIER LINE IN ACCORDANCE W/BD. • ". _ -.' '"""" � o LU SEC.275-17 C.2.C.1.0 x _ �_.......,.,....«..,.... 9L. ..` «. 0^ - FLOOD INSURANCE RATE PANEL No. 36103CO154H LAST UPDATED: 9,25.2009 (S TRUSTEES(LIVING SPACE) -. ' s ..- ,fp x n 6s _. U Q 0 o N .... .� Jy tEN� •,+. .°`^ �w1 ...POOL • 0¢^x d ( ) ) � //� �o�/� oaoseD Pool - } SUBJECT LOT: 1925 NORTH SEA ROAD,SOUTHOLD „, .„, 'ter-'�^- /I /��// /�iD //i�ioi/// PR � im SECTION:54 BLOCK:04 LOT(S):227 """""" 'FNE VE'(.t..1S)"'^' x �� to -o x ZONING:RESIDENCE'R-40'DISTRICT 1000 °°°, ;, .„. i% / �� Oi �� ���- •---' PROVIDE ACCESS TO �N a O ,�_, x ._��� NOTES POOL DRAIN FOR OC a�'� 0_ i. /�G w �/ /i/ � � �� ������ �%% MAINTENANCE. L z • ALL ZONING REFERENCES PER ZONING CODE OFTHE 1 IGS %////j� � ���l�ii/ ��iii�ii '..Z °g'0 0 o CL 1 TOWN OF ''�'" .b,� iii��,,,��,: �.�/ / %.,.. .» ...�,..„..,..;,..... CON SCALEDFLOOD FROMFLYLINEAS THE UNDISTURBED LPORTION OF THE SITE SHALL BE I -----------. � � x � � W '� SCALED FROM FLOOD MAINTAINED AS A UNDISTURBED BUFFER. INSURANCE RATE MAP PROJECT: GRAmrnw D D Y m `» + 4 T" wAwx. AVERAGE FRONT YARD REVISIONS U) I \•" .,11.36 x It DATE REVISIONS ADJACENT HOMES) 'Y� m 1 LGz LGt t "« +7.3 d� - I71 "".,,'"""-"""."""""`PROPOSED 1200 GAL. 1126P EL'IS-P£Rb T' SCREENING/EASTERN ppC,M 1U,EIDyRyN' SETBACK ES I (1, / i7� PROPAINETANK UNDERGROUND $00 . -».•»••»- a.. ... � � .�' I �� _. PROPOSED Gi.„.1,V1 775 TO KENNEYS O C PANEL IWAING 16'-0' EDGE OF EXSTING 0. 0L � (SIDE YARD SCQ PAVEMENT EDGE OF EXISTING 76PROP. cNG) PAVEMENT EDP EL.:16. (RAISEDepE16.458(r.oRDOLDDPEdDI 10, EXISTING UNDERGROUND •.•.•.. I nre EUS t0 aKa. .... ....««..w.,.,_. ..e. .-•m.«.,«....�.�ms..._...®...®..�. .,-..«.-.....,«. ._®®......e._.�..�...�........,.. ° IWWATdLkE ATER AN � G FENCE 8 ISSUE 12-WALL TILE (, 1122'TTHK GUWAILLAI DN POOLSHSAS ELL �, ,„. PROPOSED SITE PLAN D N O R T N S A D R CLEARING,SRADIINAGNANDSEE &10121 t<a COMMENT ,. W/VER TICAL HORIZONTAL .. �.--......_.,..-,,,..ms.....,µ.«.....»:»«.,,......,.DETAIL#4/A1l-2.-......_....,.......««. SS PRINT DATE CO RAINED Ex" INSIDE 010"G ATA'STEM WALLS. 'p a G�arwtEwe� 1O -- FOUNDATION WOO PILE «. ,.,«,«,...».«..«-..».«...,.....«.....,...._._..®-_ FOUNDATION (A 'E "Iu �� GDMPACIED'�TR�4ACATD'RAI. EL.:6.E3(IX°ORAD.) FILL(ROA) N 1. ^, S) (IX.GRA „ tl PROJECT No 21-350-00'. w DATE. 05-08-21 ( LINE INDICATE- b CHECKED BY: -EL.:7.oe IDc.GRwD EL.:MID0 CT 0 td �, DRAWN BY: KJ! PROP.RIY LINE w it POOL SECTION -VIEWING NORTH I scALE: AssllowN �t� (I 0 SCALE o � Y�.o I�.+f� '�'7yAAA1 M15fIM.,,Twn vA'M.+°�u w"YI�d E5'L4tlMz9 n5 JUCMtiW".119 N,LItlp°fAKw'StlFFWSYP2&TWbG e4ry,w4Y;Cbm On GGaMw&FaMP,b9.^,4'4;1'GLtlS'IRPunON',ubbq.ary, EMd9,W:.RXJF"Xsp'reY'C ;'t tik6$bR"RCR�URLC,IR'p9"LwL'ZZP CMD FR WItM'IAaI,FA At tPd41 L'G�'.tlrv"AC1oN'Lr S%F d"xd"L'YA9ft LONG ISLAND SOUND TIE LINE ALONG APPROXIMATE HIGH WATER MARK AS LOCATEDIBM BY US ON 11/25/20 mmumn ._ _ .. N40 --59"E 200.04' Paa�r ...___ -Paawl y ILI Al I 91l PZ Q tap BEACH W _ � r LANDWARD LIMITOFTIDA 8 WETLANDS AS DELINEATED 8Y1 m ZONE VE(EL-lb) US ON 11/25/20 ppm MO pE M pplp�WW II x nam�K O OETE �__ _ _.T_ mm AN�s ns®r s CEh 13 r I EDGE OF BEACH 6RAS5\ "`""°'° •` a�p 1,M . I� dl^ ppN w Ism piFTW .'11P" Y EX,MIXED VARIETY AMERICAN EXE,RDG+l75A ROBE BEACH GRASS I RUGOSA ROSE EX AMERICAN BEACH GRASS ' I ENTIRII SUBJECT LOT IS EX ORIENTAL BITTERSWEET/ ESTABLISHED AND BEACH PLUM MAINTAINED AS A "NON-DISTURBANCE BUFFER" AREA WITH A PROPOSED 4' EX.ORIENTAL BITTERSWEET/ WIDE ACCESS PATH THRU BEACH PLUM THE"NON-DISTURBANCE BUFFER"AS INDICATED. Z N a �o F J rx CONST.CLEARING O- Y a Ex MIXED VARIETY OF EASTERN V EX MIXED VARIETY SETBACK O Y L11 . ,RED CEDAR/BLACKCHERRY/ EASTERN RED N > ORIENTAL BITTERSWEET 'CEDAR 9 BEACH ,,.. N wpm Q PLUM ..... .,r..,. b Z F C� ._,�. . o w _...�. a PROPOSED AMERICAN BEACH �`' ✓" "' PROPOSED EA$TE P'RED w o GRASS IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS SCRESMNp ¢'o Z j EX.EASTERN RED CEDAR I ..Y �y " LLI y' Q J"" „, �, / V o m o y J SCREENINGS r CL ✓ �.If W-7°x E,; Q / _ ( LU mZ (D r Yd GEC pB1 C"- �,. I ,� " ZONE VE(EL 13) W F m Q O ,x ""n,.ww, „ua �n " u.o. ,.11 .,...,, ..,.w".w.�ma r..m, ..1" e".m.. .,y ,-wl a .w,",�. .�.. .ZONE AE(EL-12) �O�0> �53Z- cow WALL PROJECT: °sN"s ...._, I F7 +.. eY.!WS I �. Com. � „/ 6✓ / REVISIONS I EX.EASTERN RED CEDAR r�'fi �, / dG TE. REVISIONS I �y,✓.r _ _.. 1775' TO KENNEY'S ROAD " L A / ti ssTawa �..... _ _ EC� E0IfEll «7_, 7".5 � LANWATIM1�'E FEATURE AREA LINE AS PROPOSED AMERICAN BEAD«`r EOP PO:SCALED FROM COASTAL EROSION ry� � GRASS IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS �'1 LANWARD LIMIT OF NATURAL SUE NORTH SEA DRIVE HAZARD AREA MAP 0 C B 1 7 20 SCO DATE COMMENT m'YAfU'.'Y sbairxca�.m'4°3 B�ppletit' r 947JI .2vGBEorEp ereuau¢ms ._ - __ _. ._ . .. _. .. ... M�uM9 Vacant,_. - �...,_ _ .. , . _. .., ._.. ._ _ _.. ( ) (Vacant) , � (Dwelling with Board Of Trusteom Public Water r RRWECT No.......',1WWoo PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN DRAWus-oa N sr. s SCALE 7"=20'-O' CHECKED BY: .'.. SCALE: AS SHOWNi' NOTE PCR DCNfRACrOR -O ALL TRADES ARE REOUIREDTD REVIEWREFER DISE EFAMILIAR WITHTHEEIOF DRFW ADEOOFl FFOJECTMANUAL PACKAGEPRICETO BEGINNING ANYWORK ANYDISCSE REASDUE TO AL ACK OF­MSELOCRDINWE WRH T14= ENTIRE DOCUMENT SET WILL BE REPAIRED,RE%ACEO OR REINSTALLED AT THAT GXJIRPCT5CiE EXPENBE Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Cantrell, Elizabeth Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2022 9:05 AM To: 'Tom Wolpert' Cc: Goldsmith, Glenn; Krupski, Nick; Gillooly, Liz; Peeples, Elizabeth; Sepenoski, Eric; pcmoore@mooreattys.com; Ed Licalzi (elicalzi@cmagroupinc.com); Doug Adams; Doris Connolly Subject: RE: MKS Realty, LLC at Southold, T/O Southold, NY Attachments: 20221013082630.pdf Good Morning Tom, Yesterday the Board of Trustees performed their field inspections and reviewed the plans last revised and submitted to this office on October 11, 2022. Attached is the October 12, 2022 field inspection form. At this time the Board of Trustees are requesting revised plans be submitted for the following: Remove the proposed catwalk and gazebo from the project. 0 Relocate any proposed seaward side decking and proposed pool landward of the pier line depicted from dwelling to dwelling (living space line). Is there going to be a proposed retaining wall of any kind for the pool? If yes, please submit plans depicting all details of the retaining wall. Submit a topography plan depicting any changes to existing elevations that will occur for any addition of fill, regrading of existing property or fill from construction. Submit a re-vegetation plan for all disturbed areas. Clearly depict on the site plans the property in its entirety will be established and maintained as a Non- Disturbance Buffer area along with any proposed 4 foot wide access paths through the Non-Disturbance Buffer area. The proposed structure is to be constructed on a pile foundation. If you can submit the requested revised plans no later than Monday, October 17, 2022 at 1:00p.m.for the Board of Trustees Work Session,the Board will review the revised plans that night and determine if the project is ready to be added to the October 19, 2022 Public Hearing agenda. If you cannot submit the requested by that time,then the application will be postponed to the December 14, 2022 Public Hearing date at the earliest. Sincerely, 0ffice qfi qq i 0"T11 Of"Southold. olld. Boord (4,1['7i-11stc's r From:Tom Wolpert<TCW@youngengineering.com> Sent: Friday, October 7, 2022 3:18 PM To:Cantrell, Elizabeth<elizabethc@town.southold.ny.us> Cc:Goldsmith, Glenn<glenn.goldsmith@town.southold.ny.us>; Krupski, Nick<nickk@southoldtownny.gov>; Gillooly, Liz <lizg@southoldtownny.gov>; Peeples, Elizabeth <elizabethp@southoldtownny.gov>; Sepenoski, Eric <erics@southoldtownny.gov>; pcmoore@mooreattys.com; Ed Licalzi (elicalzi@cmagroupinc.com) <elicalzi@cmagroupinc.com>; Doug Adams<DEA@youngengineering.com>; Doris Connolly 1 <DAC@yxounQen8neering.cwnx> Subject: RE: MKS Realty, LLC atSouthold,T/O Southold, NY Good Afternoon Elizabeth, Please beadvised that xveare inthe process ofrevising the plans tofurther address the concerns ofthe Board and will be submitting the revised plans and revised project description assoon aspossible. VVeunderstand that all proposed structures shown on the revised plans will need to be re-staked prior to the Board of Trustees field inspection. Thank you for your assistance. |fyou have any questions, please contact us. Tom Tom WoTned Youog8cYoung 400Ostrander Avenue Riverhead,NYll9Vl 631.727.2303 From:Cantrell, Elizabeth [ Sent:Thursday, October O6, IO3212:J2PW1 To:Tom VVn|pert Cc: Goldsmith, Glenn � »; GiUoo|y, Liz ; Peeples, Elizabeth « � Sepenoski, Eric outhokitownrly y> Subject: MKS Realty, LLC Good Morning Tom, Regarding the revised plans received on October 4, 2022 for the application referenced above,the Board has reviewed the revised plans last revised 10/4/2022 and determined that the plans do not reflect an accurate pier line. As discussed during the August S, 2O22and September 7, 2O32 field inspections, and during the August 17, 2O2% Public Hearings the proposed structures should be no further seaward than the existing living space area, not decking, pools or walkways/catwalks. The most seaward line of a living space area is where the pier line should be taken from. You/The property owner are welcome to submit revised plans at your convenience that depict what the Board of Trustees have requested, or you/the property owner are welcome to request in writing that the Board of Trustees move forward with the current set of plans and re-open the public hearing for a possible determination. If you/the property owner decide to submit revised plans based on the correct pier line,the project will need to be re-staked based on the revised plans for Board mfTrustee review prior tofield inspections. Sincerely, Senior Office Assistant ToWDmfSmmtbsld Board ofTrustees Office- 631^765^1092 z Email I i n.ebez-I�����„y��wr4��.���„��ay��....r.I,:P,'.� 3 Glenn Goldsmith'President �Er, Town Hall Annex �",mow' a�'i A.Nicholas Krupski,Vice President �� a 54375 Route 25 Eric Sepenoski i ' ?"r P.O.Box 1179 Liz Gillooly K t��� Southold,NY 11971 Elizabeth Peeples Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection Report Date/Time: 10 ?�12. Completed in field by: 6. gM; Young &Young on behalf of MKS REALTY, LLC requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to construct a two-story 2,445sq.ft. footprint dwelling with garage; a proposed 21'10"x11'9" (253.5sq.ft.) seaward bedroom balcony with railing system; a proposed 10'4"x20'2" (191.7sq.ft.) mezzanine level bedroom balcony, railing system, a privacy screen wall along west side, and a 6' wide spiral staircase to ground; a 1,218.8sq.ft. elevated deck with a 522sq.ft. pool on seaward side, privacy screening along portion of east side, a 3'9" wide stairs with railings to ground to west and a 3'6" stairs with railings to ground to east; proposed 10' wide bar/grill area on pool deck; seaward of pool to the east off pool patio, a proposed 203.6sq.ft. elevated (ranging from ±7.5' to 10' above natural grade) catwalk leading to a 127.9sq.ft. open air gazebo with flat roof over, 3'6" wide stairs with railings to ground, and 110.6sq.ft. storage area under gazebo; proposed 663sq.ft. of non-pervious front entry stairs; proposed 4,095sq.ft. of stone blend driveway; proposed 1,200 gallon underground propane tank; new I/A OWTS sanitary system, i.e. one (1) 500 gallon wastewater treatment unit and six (6) 8.5' long by 2' effect. depth sanitary leaching galleys; public water service connection; new storm water control structures for roof runoff and driveway runoff; approximately 690 cubic yards of clean material from the excavated areas will be used to fill the site to the proposed grades; and all mechanical equipment (i.e. A/C unit), to be located above the second-story structure. Located: 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold. SCTM# 1000-54-4-20 Tyof area to be impacted: Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: °/ Chapt.275 `/Chapt. 111 other Type of Application. ✓ WetlandCoastal Erosion Amendment Administrative Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Notice of Hearing card posted on property: Yes No Not Applicable Info needed/Modifications/Conditions/Etc.: CIA 9 1 m 0 , % e 6 .. P1e Q ak� Present Were: '� G. goldsmith N. Kr pski ',/E. Sepenoski ✓ L. Gillooly E. Peeples Construction Design Management and Advisory Services 2100 Joshua's Path Hauppauge, NY 11788 e Phone: (631)675-6214 Fax: (631)675-0364 October 10 2022 Attn: Ms. Elizabeth Cantrell Town of Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: Single family Residence MKS REALTY, LLC. 1925 North Sea Drive At Southold, T/o Southold, NY (20-00153) SCTM No.: 1000-54-04-20 Dear Ms. Cantrell: In accordance with the Board of Trustees Field Inspection on September 7th, 2022 and your later, your response letter dated October 6, 2022, we have worked the entire weekend to provide an alternative plan that should now hopefully satisfy your recent definition of both "Pier Lines" as described in our revised Site Plan dated October 11, 2022.. We are also hopeful that the Board of Trustees will maintain our placement on the October Calendar as re quested last month, so we may use that time during the hearing to confirm the new placement of the proposed dwelling and provide answers to any other questions the board may have. Therefore, we have followed the Board of Trustees recommendations and have enclosed one (1) full size set and three (3) reduced copies of the Architectural Drawing Al-1 last dated October 11, 2022, for your use. (Hand delivered October 11, 2022) Very truly yours, Edward A. Licalzi, President Encl. T 1 1 2022 01010Town RMS'of T ZONING INFORMATION PROPOSED PLOT PLAN SITE PLAN LEGEND ! ' � � ZONI •""...., . NG CALCULATIONS L O N.....,. G II S L A ND S O U N D //�(� N -BolCHEDu,b xs -.obrtiAlOsvacTs � ��� PROPOSED BUILDING ,��a.�.EW,z 0.00 FT.„ 280 ATCH 3:1 58,936.00200.00 FT. THE LINE ALONG APPROXIMATE LOCATED ® SILT FENCE LOCATION LOT SIZE E THIO R 0001 S.P. 280 ATC TOTAL PRO IDED R L ��� LOT CONFORMS HIGH WATER MARK AS LOCATED ^Ea u1a,roC JRECH CONFORMS 5.00 FT.. 280 ATCH 3:1 296.57 Ff. CONFORMS BY US ON 11/28/20--, FRONT YARD 50.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 38.58 FT. NON-CONFORMS LIMIT LINE OF WORK „ % SUR IW wbut AVERAGE FRONT YARD SETBACK 38.90 FT. 38.90 FT. CONFORMS SYOSSET,NY 11791 SIDE YARD 15.00 FT 280 ATCH 3:1 17,00 Ff. CONFORMS N40o28'59"E TEL:(516)731-4667 AGGREGATE SIDE YARD 35.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 54,83 Ff. CONFORMS `^ - ••• 200.04 Fax(516)796-2744 `""-"^-•«..-....••- RUOIXPHBiSCE-PC.COM REAR YARD 50.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 225.00 FT. CONFORMS RUDOIPH 5,SHATAR FD�.CA:wI MAXIMUM PERMITTED DIMENSIONS: ._. LOT COVERAGE m 20%(11,787,20 S.F.) 280 ATCH 3:1 16%(8,289.8FT.) CONFORMS m BUILDING HEIGHT 35.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 35.,00 FT, CONFORMS O "`-•--- �� _. . NUMBER OF STORIES 21/2 280 ATCH 3:1 2 CONFORMS cr z -•-"- FIRST FLOOR AREA: 0 V) PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR 2,594.6 S.F, ,"., BEACH r.f PROPOSED FRONT ENTRANCE IMPERVIOUS 573.8 S.F.„ _ ..,..,,1.., L 7 PROPOSED GARAGE 538„3 S,�F.,. ➢ PROP.FIRST FLOOR EXT.DECK 1,023,2 S.F. O O "•"" d ' O FLOOD BOUNDARY LINE9•"'•"-..._. , .. AS SCALED FROM FLOOD - 2 0 O a •) ."."^ „+�� ONE VE rt O MEZZANINE FLOOR AREA: O �, ., ( EL-16) "., MAP w^",+ ,,FM�AN=DF PROPOSED MASTER BEDROOM 772.0 S.F. ONE VE EL-13 ..„„,.r ..;" ""•" "'-"'" It (' »`"'.., ,. "\ THE E.INFRNGEIIENT MRL 1E * INSURANCERATEW µ M EDGE OF BEACH GRAS'•-.. .. .....„ -1 ' R s A Maun0T1 FS" 7msz SECOND FLOOR AREA: 2,101.8 S.F. O '" ._.•..,«w..... w.»,„,„....,„, w w...,..w a Be 11E1P IaIIX LG1m1 1 .,„.„„ ......,.. •.,••.•.«. `✓ ARE ACM UNDER DIRECTION OF A ` us FOR ANY pum mm IwE um® 1AIOER A" N IN ANY DY. F 5,468.6 S.F. ER ro - ....•.,.` O COMPLETE FLOOR AREA TOTAL -^ """""'^° 4 ..„„, v AWINm+sIS ALTEREDsx MID .. ..,.7. .ro "vam•ALIERED of Palm 11T xs saumllE AND DATE OF SUCH '' cr LOT COVERAGE=BREAKDOWN ra .._..„ b '"" •"'�-. * OFTTHK 00"SWU BE� xmm10X __ _- (D DWELLING(WOOD FRAME) 2,594,5 &RO -• "'-�'-'"• 3.2 S,F POOL RAISED 1.5�0.0 S.F,S.F. rt -- -7...._. w GAZEBO 1279 m 204" ,,..„m --- - ,_m _.,.. »• GAZEBO STORAGE 110.6 S,F. CAT WALK 203.6 S.F. O "y h xo BEACH GRASS 'b -„ OPEN AIR GAZEBO(127.9 FRONT ENTRY STEP SYSTEM 573 8 S,F. ms ,,:w, S.F.)W/STAIRS TO GRADE DRIVEWAY + 3,145„9 S,F. 3 LOT COVERAGE TOTAL (15%)8,289.8 S.F.. •' AND STORAGE BELOW ' t" ,.-"� ._.� (NOWATER/SEWER) '..,._ __..:..._ .....,._.. LOT AREA 58,936.00 S.F. eo as CATWALK ABOVE GRADE O a\ ' x "••• (SEC.276-2A) AMOUNT OF FILL REQUIRED 470.00 CY, v x 1 xow CATWALK W/PILING (FILL TO BE CLEAN BANK-RUN SAND AND GRAVEL FROM APPROVED UPLAND SITE) "" °e6 ''sx s SUPPORTS DASHED LINE OFx; x as Q POOL EQUIPMENT N BUILDING AREA: O.H.ABOVE. x r 'o Q x LOCATED UNDER DECK t- FIRST FLOOR 2,594.8 S.F. 'x x " 8 x's - D (GROUND LEVEL) 772.5 S.F,SUITE FLOOR UIMIIT OF a s3 oo RESIDENTIAL BACKUP oJSECOND FLOOR 2,101.8 S.F. PROPOSED FILL 470 C W GENERATOR LOCATED m Z ow xo h) UNDER DECK i h Q SCHEDULE FOR OPEN SPACE AS PER 280 ATTACHMENT 6 PIER LINE IN ACCORDANCE W/BD. _ SIZE OF LOT(<15 AC) 58,936.00 1.35 AC CONFORMS '.,� •6.5 PROPOSED 12' o u CL MINIMUM OPEN SPACE 20% 000.0 S.F„ CONFORMS OF TRUSTEES(DECK SPACE) _ •�'- 0 _ N INDIGENOUS SCREENING F m MINIMUM SET BACK 30 000.0 FT. CONFORMS - » Ul PIER LINE IN ACCORDANCE W/BD. a � -`���� _ MINIMUM BUFFER 20 000,„0 FT. CONFORMS �rtn _ � � (S TRUSTEES(LIVING aaPAC."E a"s" - .+ J, .."""". ( ) w SEC.278 2A (SEC.275-11.0.2.C.1.0) ,,.• x _ _---- U.I. Pool. w _:,....._�. Zm VE A3 '. ..�, '. x l� Ii I�� . .... x._....m PROPOSED POOL cn m f/) ( ) PROVIDE ACCESS TO W =,.< O _ J ,d FLOOD INSURANCE RATE PANEL No, 36103CO154H LAST UPDATED: 9.25.2009 �� J �' +P"' 0:E o a a- 0_:-A" ')2) r �� 1 ''` os v POOL DRAIN FOR o o a tl - "' �- r . �. 1 N • MAINTENANCE. 2�z z z O Lij ------------.. �r„„ I✓ r FLOOD BOUNDARY LINE AS Z m y o 0 0- q s F11"�- �� �� SECTION:54 BLOCK904 LOT(S):227 ,, II I l�,T 16 'tiv,. ,..,.�,: '2'01`"1 SCALED FROM FLOOD ---- JECT-- DRAONG •- SUBJECT LOT: 1925 NORTH SEA ROAD,SOUTHOLD ';� " � 2F� 1.an 'ED" �- -,---�- -� •-��.-�-- PROJECT. _ ...,•„• P;�M1,, -" 'VVAL INSURANCE RATE MAP NNA�EE ZONING:RESIDENCE'R�0'DISTRICT 1000 Qom , ",' r' x,. w , "'�' SFT.DIA.x 4FT. v a" rw',)r•, '. REVISIONS (7 DEEP SWIMMING POOL ��. ..._..,_....„,„.._....-' w + BACKWASH NOTES ) G S Z »..... _..7136•- /. ., +7.3 sssPROPOSED s200�0AL. 11TE� REVISIONS ALL ZONING REFERENCES PER ZONING CODE OF THE SETBACK EST.BY ^"-�:.,,,, UNDERGROUND r uw.z� Twlry TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ADJACENT HOME j O - u'"' , ,y�EM1„ , THE UNDISTURBED PORTION OF THE SITE SHALL BE ( NaT9.1� !m G fir» PROPAN)ETANK MAINTAINED AS A UNDISTURBED BUFFER. „ •"• "„"" " » .. •... b- PRGPOSED GRA _ ». 1,775"'TO KEN„_ ._ O_ 5 _„ 00. _w_•____. -DRfVEWAM EDGE OF IXISTING +�„�,4 ' '"�' _ PAVEMENT "S"„¢. a }.. 4 EDGE OF EXISTING _ PROPOSED WATERPROOF• �'o ""� s �r� �? � e��"� -� PAVEMENT � r TEST HOLE _ BY McDONALD OEOSCIEE EXISTING UNDERGROUND ` I NEW RETAINING WALL. ,�i.._..„,,.. WATER MAIN _. . . . ._O ._T_. S._E ._A . _. _V__._._. ._. DATE:D5/11/06 EL=6.45' O.QY EE AL- • UE HAYS ES ALONG LIMIT COF COMMENT 3 1SmoDREssPRINr PALE BROWN PROPOSED SITE PLAN • CLEARING,GRADING AND FINE TOGROU COARSE SCALE 1 =20�-0....-._..a.. ,....®�...... ...A...�....._».. _._.�...„....._....._.,__.._. .„......,. .,_.__._..._,. .,.__....,..,.._.._........._._-_._,..._.. ._.._:..... ......_...,..... __._..�.......r,�.._,.� ,_.._............DETAIN#4A32 DISTURBANCE. I.vlarts�v1seDPE:RcomrneNr '. GW=1.65' 4.B' WATER IN -.- PALE BROWN FINE TO SAN �, • EE BY:D. 210-08-21. COARSE DRA Board 1W TDrr 1 SAND 5021 of Trustees 11.0' ( Y A3 SHOWN CHECKED B �. ....._........,,.....,.,, ........,.. SCALE AU TFIALE"A AIME RE'GRlMWVD TO REVIEW DEFER TO AND 6E FMIUARWTN TIE ENTIRE DRAWING SET AND PROJECT AUwUP1 - P R'4YM TD MCMUNMM6 Add'f WN ANY W=P'M IES DUE TD A LACK OF O 5.71%W Gd19R I-ONWITN TIE E 1'NROkNDDMAY4NT"AE"MM4I.L IE YTENAMRED,REN6A4:Ei'k MR N('JNSTMLFD AT THAT CGWI'NU4.D'P9AM"304,F FYAENSE Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Cantrell, Elizabeth Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2022 12:22 PM To: 'Tom Wolpert' Cc: Goldsmith, Glenn; Krupski, Nick; Gillooly, Liz; Peeples, Elizabeth; Sepenoski, Eric Subject: MKS Realty, LLC Good Morning Tom, Regarding the revised plans received on October 4, 2022 for the application referenced above, the Board has reviewed the revised plans last revised 10/4/2022 and determined that the plans do not reflect an accurate pier line. As discussed during the August 9, 2022 and September 7, 2022 field inspections, and during the August 17, 2022 Public Hearings the proposed structures should be no further seaward than the existing living space area, not decking, pools or walkways/catwalks. The most seaward line of a living space area is where the pier line should be taken from. You/The property owner are welcome to submit revised plans at your convenience that depict what the Board of Trustees have requested,or you/the property owner are welcome to request in writing that the Board of Trustees move forward with the current set of plans and re-open the public hearing for a possible determination. If you/the property owner decide to submit revised plans based on the correct pier line,the project will need to be re-staked based on the revised plans for Board of Trustee review prior to field inspections. Sincerely, Co :.& Senior Office Assistant Town of Southold Board of Trustees Office: 631-765-1892 Email: elizabethc@southoldtownny.gov 1 Construction Design Management and Advisory Services 2100 Joshuas Path Hauppauge, NY 11788 Phone: (631)675-6214 Fax: (631)675-0364 October 4, 2022 Attn: Ms. Elizabeth Cantrell Town of Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: Single family Residence MKS REALTY, LLC. 1925 North Sea Drive At Southold, T/o Southold, NY (20-00153) SCTM No.: 1000-54-04-20 Dear Ms. Cantrell: In accordance with the Board of Trustees Field Inspection on September 7t�', 2022, it was recommended by the President of the Board that if we relocate the proposed dwelling landward of the "pier line" the Board would find it favorable to approve our application of the newly proposed dwelling. Therefore, we have followed the Board of Trustees recommendations and have enclosed one (1)full size set and three (3) reduced copies of CMA Group Architectural Drawing A11-1 last dated October 4, 2022, for your use. (Hand delivered October 4, 2022) Very truly yours, Edward A. Licalzi, President Encl. DE C E IN E UD OCT -. 4,, 202.2 W Town soam of Tnstm ZONING INFORMATION I PROPOSED PLOT PLAN w.wW " _ __ ._. ,, ,_v..__.... ww..ww....._._._._� _v. ., .._ w.., , ww w LONG .1.�._��"".._. ._mM�_..�..w. ,.�, _��ww �_ww .�. _,����."� ___... �.���. �-�..._.. �,n ; .....wn . ... A D S 0 U D SITE PLAN"LEGEND P �... ZONING CALCULATIONS PROPOSED BUILDING . _.,.. .____.. C ." "" ., THE LINE ALONG APPROXIMATE ED HIGH WATER MARK A9 LOCATED DISTRICT R-00 REQUIRED SECTION TOTAL PROVID" LOT SIZE 40,000 S.F. 280 ATCH 1:1 58,936.00 S.F. CONFORMS BY US ON I I125/'2o O SILT FENCE LOCATION„�. LOT WIDTH 150.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 - 200.00 FT. CONFORMS �. esnvz�,� LOT DEPTH 175,00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 296.57 FT. CONFORMS LIMIT LINE OF WORK mipm FRONT YARD 50.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 38.58 FT. NON-CONFORMS N40°28'58°E 1: son'10 SIDE YARD 15.00 FT 280 ATCH 3:1 17.00 FT. CONFORMS 200.04 Mtt rx'N1 AGGREGATE SIDE YARD 35.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 52.25 FT. CONFORMS ,! (N4 733-4 REAR YARD 50.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 213.80 FT. CONFORMS '"'-- "'""'"'"-"`--^°° FAX IMI '94}-9T ....._. w................ ... ...._- --'--- --- uw 3 OOT COVERAGE ITTED DIMENSIONS, 20%(11,787.20 S.F.) 280 ATCH 3:1 15%(8,721.6 FT.) CONFORMS •- "- BUILDING HEIGHT 35.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 35.00 FT. CONFORMS """`"""' ""---• ------ m-TM NUMBER OF STORIES 21/2 280 ATCH 3:1 2 CONFORMS FIRST FLOOR AREA: BEACH Y0�g h PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR 2,853,9 S,F. `- 47 k PROPPROPOSED GARAGE 538 0 S.F.F ------ - .. PROP.FIRST FSED OOOR EXT,NT ADECKNCE IMPERVIOUS 2 0 „3 S.. . 2 S.F. _ ------- q . O !FLOOD BOUNDARY LINE ."�� ID � w ZONE VE(EL-16) AS SCALED FROM F1 QQD " A INSURANCE RATE 14to � -------- �,",, MEZZANINE FLOOR AREA: (EL-13 mm ..._„ -,...,. „µ.. ZONE VE `.," �-�,•, ,._.. I SOW NO AM M vnamir OF IM 001191"IMIENDI NLL IE PROPOSED MASTER BEDROOM 1,073.0 S.F. EDGE OF BEACH GRAS'S..- `5�_ M. R m R am nm m m*ox INNO SECOND FLOOR AREA: 2.204.9 S.F. O """'-^--•-: .._..._..� .„w,_.......m VµN ,u. F U M "m atom no" mi N mnwc 6,131.8 S.F. '"-°^-,�.. xNr,wrrt�dl wr wY �"' .... __. r ) r uaeuaa m A A COMPLETE FLOOR AREA TOTAL � " °�, " �- O +m01E .,....,_ ,p� .,w".. ,� � neoneawv�Gu�r LOTCOVERAGE-BREAKDOWN .m. .,. .,. ..."w�. ° 6,� ^'ta..m_...._.� Ke -m-�,...M .__<._.. ....-,._.. C. mrae�mom No s ...,..__ .." ....., o DWELLING WOOD FRAME 2„853.9 S.F. :2A{L.„...,. 5 -1----"-- GAZEBO .._. x .mm-......... L ( ) 0 5� RAISED DECK 1„510.0 S.F. " � N POOL 510.0 S.F. W6- B GAZEBO 127.9 S.F. �� � GAZEBO FRONT ENTRY STEP SYSTEM 3,145.9 S.F. OM" `,m. x y,,,,,, ,. x EACH GRASS'0s "r 4 OPEN AIR GAZEBO CAT WALK 203.6 S.F. Q) .1 p DRIVEWAY -a '"r AND W/STA O TO GRADE - f� O „LLT �AI AND STORAGE BELOW 1 V (NO WATER/SEWER) LOT COVERAGE TOTAL (15%)8.721.6 S.F. Ir- 3 xa e CATWALK ABOVE GRADE �IrIS x ' s' x SEC.275-2.A LOT AREA 58,936.00 S.F. :yy (p @ '`.®l _ F,... mrA `^ ( ) CATWALK W/PILING -.. AMOUNT OF FILL REQUIRED 470.00 CY, elr yx � 'f�j� " , SUPPORTS _v (FILL TO BE CLEAN BANK-RUN SAND AND GRAVEL FROM APPROVED UPLAND SITE) DASHED LINE Or x POOL EQUIPMENT O.H.ABOVE. ' LOCATED UNDER DECK o " c BUILDING AREA: � .w FIRST FLOOR 2,653.9 S.F. D+ M� * x ,,..,.. i.. " "I xs� (GROUND LEVEL) �. RESIDENTIAL BACKUP o MASTER SUITE FLOOR 1,073.0 S.F. �6 x m GENERATOR LOCATED o SECOND FLOOR 2,204,9 S.F. LIMIT OF ''" o y x '...� / w. (A UNDER DECK > PROPOSED FILL "".,, x •-'"""""`'� rt 3 m Z (APPROX.470 CY) '$. « ,-,_,_.w«.. PROPOSED 12' SCHEDULE FOR OPEN SPACE AS PER 280 ATTACHMENT 6 c,o, -- -. '""'�' ` 1, INDIGENOUS SCREENING LL J SIZE OF LOT(<15 AC) 58,936,00 1.35 AC CONFORMS .y, 21 m MINIMUM OPEN SPACE 20% 000.0 S.F. CONFORMS PIER LINE ,.,,,..,,.� """" « MINIMUM SET BACK 30 000.0 FT. CONFORMS ACCORDANCE W I= TsRUSTEES ', MINIMUM BUFFER 20 000.0 FT. CONFORMS (SEC.275-2A) zec.z75-11.4. D WUW o m gr PROPOSED POOL o ° W2AN VE( t PROVIDE ACCESS TO oZ. Wotia5 O POOL DRAIN FOR FLOOD INSURANCE RATE PANEL Na. 36103C0154H LAST UPDATED: 9.25.2009 -B'5 ([Al) MAINTENANCE. O: i 0 o FLOOD BOUNDARY LINE AS z 0 _ �� .. ' .5- it -"LL� / v 1 o' N SCALED FROM FLOOD W m 0 0�. ,...„..! �I 2�-�E°s- w.....„,. ry_, I,' «.,.. ,,, ....«. ar,.�.- s,.,., �... ;� .... �_ _ INSURANCE RATE MAP PROJECT: -- nahure SUBJECT LOT: 1925 NORTH SEA ROAD,SOUTHOLD a� �� xuMrrm ".3e x* 1 I OarA�wmz SECTION:54 BLOCK:04 LOT(S):227 D +,� # ,, '$ ZONING:RESIDENCE'R-40'DISTRICT 1000 � AVERAGE FRONT YARD .., _,. BFT.DIA,x 4FT. „. ,^ .".. SETBACK EST.BY Z 73 s 31 DEEP SWIMMING POOL REVISIONS M. NOTES ( fn "; � .,. b j� z " „, + a PROPOSED 200 GAL. 91ArEj REVISIONS ALL ZONING REFERENCES PER ZONING CODE OF THE ADJACENT HOMES „ ar. - a fn 3 BACKWASH _ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �ji,Z FE �°z �°i ry- " .. . .,72x..,. •"�.,,......._ .,.-J,......, ._.. PRCMPA,NE TAN _.._........_._..�.m..., �.N 1 's4w THE UNDISTURBED PORTION OF THE SITE SHALL BE ro "� .._ _.7 '^ ^m m 7w e I EDGE OF EXI9TING� !-_.�w.Y a� ,775'TO KENNEY'S +47At7 x 00. O s u ` } �c _ MAINTAINED R EUNDISTURBEDBUFFER. 1..._�._...._._..__... .. Y .,ITT jS38�24 - -j S ............ ._..m,w.- ,.. . so j } PAVEMENT _. 4 STING s .......�.._..._........�...., ,._-._,.._."_,... �w„ ...._ WATER MAINDERGROUND TESTHOLE �����------------...._..-. _..�......_..�.._...._.....-.�.�._..._,�..............,.�,..«. o OJ LIMITING FENCE6 r PROJECT c e BY McDONE:0 /11 Joe ENCS N O R T V E A D R I V E ,.IgyggLE3 ALONG LIMIT OF ISSUE DATE:06/11!06 ING, � ELawS.aF1d' o.a PALE BROWN GROUND DISTURBANCE.SEE DATE COMMENT FINE TO .,. SITE PLAN .............._....,_.®.W..,.,......_...,..........,,_..n...,.....,,..m.....,._,......_,_.._.. ..®... .. .m,........,..m..._....._..,........,..__,,.-..w.,.. C�.._...®......._........._...,......-_,w,."....,.W.....DETAIL#4/A1..®?._.a.,�...,, COARSE .(. ., IS¢9iERu4s PROPOSED S ` (svv)D �+ r Gw=1.as„ a.e� PALE BROWN A 350-00 WATER IN � ' FRDJECT N° 2 I FINE TO �. �� „q COARSE t» r _ oiftho'ld!!TOWR SAND SW) 05-06-21 Board of T(asl B3 ( � I,,, ORAWN BY KJS V S !CHECKED BY (SCALE; AS SHOWN pI?, ....MtMQSSWA*AWW ,.,..�. A�1✓G.� �I�� h DTO REVIEW.REETRTO ANO EFAMIIJM WDH THEEMIRE DfNWIN SET AND ROJ-MANUAL SET OOCURNINC ANY W EMIRS ORKR DI DORRE OUE TO MACK OF GRO55-TRAOEGCCROINATION WITH THE MEM EPAIRED REPLACED RRHNstNlm ATTW1T GOMRAGfOR450.EExPEN$E n ,, , Nil i t g 51020 RUA7N ROAD SOZTq^HOLD NIy 11971 63107650330 �,...,, iii.., /vs k� 1 ATC1A C.NIOOPF(BST � �� �j 5 2022 I-Le, MOO, &mMaWTown Bawd atTtaas Board of Trustees Application AUTHORIZATION i OCT 5 2022. (where the applicant is not the owner) Southold town Board of Trustees Tony Vournou,member of MKS Realty LLC, owners of premises 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold,NY 11971, (sctm: 1000-54.-2-20),residing at 77 Meadowbrook Rd., Syosset,New York, do hereby authorize our attorney, Patricia C. Moore,to apply for permit(s) and appear before the Southold Board of Town Trustees on our behalf. MKS Realty LLC: (owner's signature) By: Tony- ournou Sworn to be ore me this day of .2022 Notary P '-lic MANOLI KALAMOTOUSAKIS NOTARY PU611C-STATE OF NEW YORk No. 02KA621 3500 Qualified In Queens County MN commission Expires November 09,201 APPLICANT TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM (FOR SUBMISSION BY OWNER and OWNER'S AGENT) The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics orolwibits conflicts of interest on the stat of Town officers and emnlovees. The purpose of t)MNonrr is to rarovude iatorrcuation_which can alert the Town of nossilale conflicts of int gjst and altow it t+ take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: VOURNOU,TONY,member of MKS REALTY LLC,and MOORE,PATRICIA (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company. If so,indicate the other person or company name.) NATURE OF APPLICATION:(Check all that apply.) Tax Grievance Variance Special Exception .„ U"Other", name the activity: it tvSe— Change of Zone Approval of Plat Exemption from Plat or Official Map Other Trustees X Do you personally,(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES_ NO Complete the balance of this form and date and sign below where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold: Title or position of that person:_ Describe that relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D(below)and/or describe the relationship in the space provided. The Town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP­_ Submitted this 0/ day of 2022 MKS REAL.]YIXIC BY: oi Pat,irwa C,Mo",. .. ore AL ••!ter F rev � �• � f . fib i .{ 7 f a- ILI defy � ti F �A Y � Q r fr *• - 4. A LO w AUG 1 7 2722r Board of Trustees .A „ Southold Town ' F a Ir it .. Ip {`"� gg a-_ F .yxJ� - 'cif•'�,��•a�•• -...._ _ _ _ fid" -' � ear � -, .. � .�.,. � ,_. •. �� 'afl��. s w_ ` L � Lo 1 Q .i � 4 '.sari t 1r Glenn Goldsmith,President ' Town Hall Annex A.Nicholas Krupski,Vice President 54375 Route 25 Eric Sepenoski P.O.Box 1179 Liz Gillooly ", " "' Southold,NY 11971 Elizabeth Peeples " Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection Report Date/Time: � 1 1t - . Completed in field by: LEt Young & Young on behalf of MKS REALTY, LLC requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to construct a two-story 2,445sq.ft. footprint dwelling with garage; a proposed 21'10°'x11'9" (253.5sq.ft.) seaward bedroom balcony with railing system; a proposed 10'4"x20'2" (191.7sq.ft.) mezzanine level bedroom balcony, railing system, a privacy screen wall along west side, and a 6' wide spiral staircase to ground; a 1,218.8sq.ft. elevated deck with a 522sq.ft. pool on seaward side, privacy screening along portion of east side, a 3'9" wide stairs with railings to ground to west and a 3'6" stairs with railings to ground to east; proposed 10' wide bar/grill area on pool deck; seaward of pool to the east off pool patio, a proposed 203.6sq.ft. elevated (ranging from ±7.5' to 10' above natural grade) catwalk leading to a 127.9sq.ft. open air gazebo with flat roof over, 3'6" wide stairs with railings to ground, and 110.6sq.ft. storage area under gazebo; proposed 663sq.ft. of non-pervious front entry stairs; proposed 4,095sq.ft. of stone blend driveway; proposed 1,200 gallon underground propane tank; new I/A OWTS sanitary system, i.e. one (1) 500 gallon wastewater treatment unit and six (6) 8.5' long by 2' effect. depth sanitary leaching galleys; public water service connection; new storm water control structures for roof runoff and driveway runoff; approximately 690 cubic yards of clean material from the excavated areas will be used to fill the site to the proposed grades; and all mechanical equipment (i.e. A/C unit), to be located above the second-story structure. Located: 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold. SCTM# 1000-54-4-20 Type of area to be impacted: Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: Chapt.275 Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: —V—Wetland V✓ Coastal Erosion Amendment Administrative Emergency Pre-Submission Violation. Notice of Hearing card posted on property: Yes No Not Applicable Info needed/Modifications/Conditions/Etc,: i a Present Were: ✓G. Goldsmith s N. Krupski ✓ E. Sepenoski L. Gillooly ✓E. Peeples MKS Realty,LLC 1925 North Sea Drive,Southold SCTMP: 1000-54-4-20 8/9/22 ME- 1 7 y, AL r' no no UO Wk IIS P * '�pY ,• '". ►r �� � �.� .- :MKS Realty,LLC ,1925 North Sea Drive,Southold 000 { r w t••r .,,9,/- -:9 r s a r r 1 �� �, •�� — - -t i s it w.• Fr r� k^ K. r T w ,,r• "—���s ' +� �-� • .r=te `�• s4 '� � r. r1�� ay o ,'�a rrr r - 1 4 �.•_ �� i. i fit"Yt'�..` < I Y..' y .ri r � r ' e� 't � •may /�.�{ •�'� } ��� •r .r _ ,.. .- ., ., • _ v•� S �` r� •�yam,+�, Y a• f •x k { � � 4i�,*I �^ .yqy;��}� "fit � rte. � +p 1 � s, �� 's� �..'� � y, ♦C►+� ..P 7 ,,.� ►h. �.. ' e. `ti' w 1` `,i.� .E yt,,�„Y`Y' � '`L • f, ,y. r . .s - -' C.'• ._,. M1�+ ^�S� ” ,�� .. s 5 3 - "'� mar. + v• 1•• r �' •✓�- - w' .� OFFICE LOCATION: �� MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 • Telephone: 631 765-1938 enum LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Glenn Goldsmith, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, AICP LWRP Coordinator Date: August 9, 2022 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for MKS REALTY, LLC SCTM# 1000-54-4-20 Young & Young on behalf of MKS REALTY, LLC requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to construct a two-story 2,445sq.ft. footprint dwelling with garage; a proposed 21'10"x11'9" (253.5sq.ft.) seaward bedroom balcony with railing system; a proposed 10'4"x20'2" (191.7sq.ft.) mezzanine level bedroom balcony, railing system, a privacy screen wall along west side, and a 6' wide spiral staircase to ground; a 1,218.8sq.ft. elevated deck with a 522sq.ft. pool on seaward side, privacy screening along portion of east side, a 3'9" wide stairs with railings to ground to west and a 3'6" stairs with railings to ground to east; proposed 10' wide bar/grill area on pool deck; seaward of pool to the east off pool patio, a proposed 203.6sq.ft. elevated (ranging from ±7.5' to 10' above natural grade) catwalk leading to a 127.9sq.ft. open air gazebo with flat roof over, 3'6" wide stairs with railings to ground, and 110.6sq.ft. storage area under gazebo; proposed 663sq.ft. of non- pervious front entry stairs; proposed 4,095sq.ft. of stone blend driveway; proposed 1,200 gallon underground propane tank; new I/A OWTS sanitary system, i.e. one (1) 500 gallon wastewater treatment unit and six (6) 8.5' long by 2' effect. depth sanitary leaching galleys; public water service connection; new storm water control structures for roof runoff and driveway runoff; approximately 690 cubic yards of clean material from the excavated areas will be used to fill the site to the proposed grades; and all mechanical equipment (i.e. A/C unit), to be located above the second- story structure. Located: 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold. SCTM# 1000-54-4-20 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposal is INCONSISTENT with LWRP Policies and with the LWRP. Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. 1. Avoid development other than water-dependent uses in coastal hazard areas. Locate new development which is not water-dependent as far away from coastal hazard areas as practical. a. No development is permitted in natural protective feature areas, except as specifically allowed under the relevant portions of 6 NYCRR 505.8. b. Avoid hazards by siting structures to maximize the distance from Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas. 1. The entire parcel is located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area VIII II � ,r /' f. t„ �P � I ell 17 Q� V EI C I u� � y r � � u✓� � i I,Y� I ( I �, �! J ism„ �r ul �.� - yin � ""Fed nol Ge m,., r o.��a�����.;�Q �_.�.����������_;�a �������r��;� " ��.��:�. � �r..���n �� � � :����� �� � ,u The purpose of Chapter 111, COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREAS is to regulate, in coastal areas, land use and development activities so as to minimize or prevent damage or destruction to man-made property, natural protective features and other natural resources and to protect human life. In addition, the purpose of Chapter 111 is to regulate new construction or placement of structures in order to place them a safe distance from coastal hazard areas. § 111-4. Purpose. The Town of Southold hereby assumes the responsibility and authority to implement and administer a Coastal Erosion Management Program within its jurisdiction pursuant to Article 34 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law. In addition, it is the purpose of this chapter to: B. Regulate, in coastal areas subject to coastal flooding and erosion, land use and development activities so as to minimize or prevent damage or destruction to man-made property, natural protective features and other natural resources and to protect human life. C. Regulate new construction or placement of structures in order to place them a safe distance from areas of active erosion and the impact of coastal storms to ensure that these structures are not prematurely destroyed or damaged due to improper siting, as well as to prevent damage to natural protective features and other natural resources. 2. The entire structure is located within a VE EL 13 flood zone. VE coastal areas are subject to high-velocity water including waves; defined by the 1-percent annual chance flood and wave effects 3 feet or greater. This means that the flood has a 1% chance of being met or exceeded in any given year. , �,i�" , iij�✓ori i, � 9 � � rl 6/ ////i%/ � � i��uu... � .rc "a iry J fir, fl �d88 6 to / Ir%i�l, W°G r�9i /n1Jl i I/1 j l /h raJl�wwir ii I' iii r I�sd�!, u r y Day / i tywb«k J / / J, r %f�l+1fr'PUi�� k9 ylv. ri%1�Dw / :%i� A rn //iii✓ i > > i e r w i i E 3. The parcel and any development on the parcel will be adversely impacted by categories 1 through 4hurricanes. 4. The parcel will be adversely impacted by sea level rise over time. 4.2 Protect and restore natural protective features. Natural protective geologic features provide valuable protection and should be protected, restored and enhanced. Destruction or degradation of these features should be discouraged or prohibited. A. No development is permitted in natural protective feature areas, except as specifically allowed under the relevant portions of 6 NYCRR 505.8. B. Maximize the protective capabilities of natural protective features by.- 1. y.1. avoiding alteration or interference with shorelines in a natural condition The proposed actions are located entirely within the coastal erosion hazard area and the primary dune, a natural protective feature. A primary dune is defined in § 111-6 Definitions as a natural protective feature. NATURAL PROTECTIVE FEATURE -- A nearshore area, beach, bluff, primary dune, secondary dune or marsh and their vegetation. PRIMARY DUNE-- The most waterward major dune where there are two or more parallel dunes within a coastal area. Where there is only one dune present, it is the "primary"one. Occasionally one or more relatively small dune formations exist waterward of the primary dune. These smaller formations will be considered to be part of the "primary dune"for the purposes of this chapter. The waterward limit of a primary dune is the landward limit of its fronting beach. The landward limit of the primary dune is 25 feet landward of its landward toe. A site visit of this area was conducted on October 17 2007. In attendance at the site visit among others were representatives of the Town of Southold Board of Trustees LWRP Coordinator Mark Ter and NYS DEC's Environment Program Specialist Robert McDonough, which confirmed that the proposed actions are entirely located seaward of the CEHA line and within a primary dune.This determination still applies, Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Honorable Lori Hulse, Attorney Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Caroline Yates <rcyates91 @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2022 1:55 PM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth Cc: Caroline Yates Subject: 1625 North Sea Drive Comments for the Board of Trustees Attachments: 1635 North Sea Drive Comments.pdf Good afternoon Ms.Cantrell, Would you please provide my comment letter to the Trustees in advance of this evening's meeting on the proposal to develop the property located at 1625 North Sea Drive in Southold. Thank you very much for your consideration of this matter. Your, Caroline Yates ATTENTION:This email came from an external source.Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 1 3340 Oaklawn Avenue Southold, New York 11971 August 17, 2022 Board of Trustees E Q Town of Southold Southold Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road AUG 1 7 2022 PO. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Southold n Honorable Trustees of the Town of Southold, Board of Tru to s I oppose the development of the undeveloped land at 1925 North Sea Drive in Southold. First, it is the only remaining undeveloped parcel of primary and secondary dune east of Peconic Dunes Camp in The Goldsmith's Inlet and Beach Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat. Once this piece of land has been developed, visitors to this area will have to go into Sound View Dunes County Park and walk a ways to get a natural view of Long Island Sound. In this way, development of the parcel closes out an era of natural beauty for this part of Southold Town. As development of the parcel appears imminent, the Town of Southold would be wise to consider purchasing this view way. A place that all of us have forever taken for granted is about to be taken away by a developer who is just "doing his job". Second, with regard to the development of a previously undeveloped parcel of land, the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP)Appendix A- Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats identifies the project site as falling within the Goldsmith Inlet and Beach Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat. As such, a Habitat Impairment Test should be applied to this project as our Town has an approved local waterfront revitalization program. The proposed project would likely fail the habitat impairment test as it will remove the vegetation, disturb the soils , likely introduce invasive species, and probably introduce pesticides and rodenticides to the property; all of which will significantly impair the viability of the habitat of the ecosystem in the primary and secondary dune on the project site. Beyond the habitat impairment test: please consider the following.The entire site falls within the Coastal Erosion Zone. Sea level is expected to rise approximately 10 inches in the next 30 years. The project site will likely (should certainly) experience an increase in ground water elevation. The test hole data provided by McDonald Geoscience (dated 5/11/06) indicates that groundwater is found 4.8 feet below ground surface. That data was collected 16 years ago. A new test should be required as the depth to groundwater may be different in 2022. The geologist should also provide precipitation data for the months and days preceding the borehole test as well since the well drained sand in the primary and secondary dune can transmit groundwater in excess of 1 foot/day and water table elevations in this area are extremely sensitive to variations in rainfall. The proposed maximum height of the water table as 1.7 ft above msl probably needs to be revised to reflect current conditions and expected ground water elevation changes due to rising sea level. Groundwater flows from the site directly to Long Island Sound. Septic effluent will be discharging near the shoreline into the Sound and likely impact the water quality there. The propane tank proposed for the site is to be buried. While I could not find anything in the Town code pertaining to buried propane tanks in flood prone areas, buried tanks will float when flooded. Building a house in a known Coastal Erosion Zone where flood events may come from the shoreline as a result of storm events and increasing tides due to rising sea level and from the street side from rising groundwater elevations due to rising sea level should consider the benefits of above ground propane tanks over buried ones. The plans indicate wide spread habitat destruction on site to accommodate the needs of the house, septic system, buried tanks, gazebo and outdoor toilet and mechanical rooms. While the developer states that the fill will come from onsite sources, it is important to note that even with fill being from on-site sources, the habitat will be destroyed. The native seed bank will be disturbed. Disturbed land promotes the growth of invasive species. Unless the Trustees indicate otherwise in their permits, the developer may replace the ecosystem with non native plants as has been done at other recents new homes along the same Significant Habitat (see east side of Kenney's Beach parking lot house rebuilt in 2020-21). The destruction of the dune ecosystem at the proposed project site will also likely impact the beach habitat of the Least Terns and Piping Plovers which have made their nesting sites along the Goldsmith Inlet and Beach Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat. Appendix A of the Town's LWRP indicates that the ecosystem (Maritime dune and maritime freshwater interdunal swale communities) is rare in New York State. Known vulnerable species residing in the ecosystem or utilizing the ecosystem for its survival include the Piping Plover(Endangered), the Least Tern (Threatened) and the the Osprey(Special Concern). The replaceability of the area is Irreplaceable. Thank you for the opportunity to submit these comments for the record. Very truly yours, Caroline P. Yates EC E P IS AUG 17 2022 Sout old T wa --.Board of Trusl•ees Cantrell, Elizabeth From: LYNNE NORMANDIA <Inormandia@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2022 3:46 PM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth Cc: Peggy Lauber Audubon Subject: Application: MKS Realty, 1925 North Sea Drive Hello Elizabeth,please place in the appropriate file for our Trustees? Thank you Lynne My Dear Trustees: This is to beg you to put your collective feet down and stop the new build on 1925 North Sea Drive before it's too late. The fact that it would be built in the flood zone should be of concern. The fact that developers will destroy the crest of natural dunes which buffer the area is of concern to all of us living nearby not to mention the Comprehensive Plan. These low dunes are home to a bird becoming so rare, it's about to be listed as endangered by the Migratory Species Act and protected by the Federal Government. Least Terns chose this beach this summer to make dozens of nests. They abandoned other nesting places on the East End to congregate here. Surprised, the DEC added fencing late in the season to alert passersby. This half mile stretch of sand and grass has become one of the last integral places for raising their chicks. The vast scope of the proposed house with pool and gazebo next to their breeding ground will most certainly disrupt the natural habitat needed by these threatened birds. Please take nature into account! Sincerely, Lynne Normandia 2100 Leeton Drive Cc. North Fork Audubon ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 1 Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Richard Bird <Richardb26@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2022 11:56 AM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth Subject: 1925 North Sea Drive construction Elizabeth, please see that this letter gets in the appropriate file for MKS REALTY 1925 North Sea Drive Southold Dear Trustees: I am writing this letter in regards to the proposed construction on 1925 North Sea Drive. Once again we are faced with the complete destruction of a primary and secondary dune. The scale of this proposed project will destroy every bit of this last remaining open space on North Sea Drive. I urge the trustees to use every tool available to them to, at the least, scale this monstrosity back to a more fitting plan. When and if this ever does get built I also urge your board or building dept.to monitor this project almost on a daily basis. Least we find ourselves in the same situation as Southold Sunsets with numerous as builds and constant begging for forgiveness, all at a cost to taxpayers. With the attitude these days of"build what we want and pay the consequences,"the minuscule fines imposed are just the cost of doing business. Possibly it's time that a construction bond be required for such a project of this size and future projects such as this one. Sincerely Richard Bird Sent from my iPad ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Tom Wolpert <TCW@youngengineering.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 3:16 PM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth Subject: MKS Realty LLC at Southold,T/O Southold, NY- Stake Locations for Trustees Inspection Attachments: SKM_C25822080314440.pdf Elizabeth, Attached is a copy of our field sketch depicting the locations of stakes set,for your use. Tom Tom Wolpert Young&Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead,NY 11901 631.727.2303 tcw@youngengineering.com ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 1 89 ro Vt O S �x � S• d' �.�v '` ,FS �+� '� O cj6. ��s �x S a, • '9 d�Oy�`�6� O9j���OO •�g 2�S'�p � �9 ,�' S�xdo. S S• ��f� •�i+b�l,��d Pv� ��o x Spd �•S'Od.�ly !�2 �•(�( (chJ„' ,+; ooc O ,� � ru 2 O � s. d d y 0 4 O dl •.' 3Q 01, ti�yo,� �; ` .• Q. 12 ti P <7; mcg � < r rv, Rte; '0a, /�� � � •!!��\ �\�� cb ('"N ovs, �Ile- 00 °Od,'lJ 7p 00' 069 Glenn Goldsmith, President ' s Town Hall Annex A.Nicholas Krupski, Vice President a ,r Eric Sepenoski 54375 Route 25 Liz Gillooly , P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Elizabeth Peeples :'" Telephone(631)765-1892 71 Fax(631)765-6641 Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection Report Date/Time: tQ) Completed in field by: E � Young & Young on behalf of MKS REALTY, LLC requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to construct a two-story 2,445sqft. footprint dwelling with garage, a proposed 2110"x11:1911 (25 .5sq,ft.) seaward bedroom balcony with railing system; a proposed 10"4""x20'2"" (191.7sgft) mezzanine level bedroom balcony" railing system, a privacy screen wall along west side, and a 5"wide spiral staircase to ground; a 1,218,8sq,ft, elevated deck with a 522s ,ft. pool on seaward side, privacy screening along portion of east side" a '9" wide stairs with railings to ground to west and a "5" stairs with railings to ground to east; proposed 10"wide bar/grill area on pool deck; seawardof pool to the east off pool patio, a proposed 20 .Ssq.ft, elevated (ranging from 17,5' to 10" above natural grade) catwalk leading to a 127.9sq.ft. open, air gazebo with flat roof over, "5"wide stairs with railings to ground„ and 110.6sq.ft. storage area under gazebo; proposed 56sq.ft. of non-pervious front entry stairs; ,proposed 4"095sq.ft. of stone blend driveway; proposed 1,200 gallon underground propane tank; new I/A OWTS sanitary system" i.e. one (1) 500 gallon wastewater treatment unit and six(5) 5,5" long by 2" effect. depth sanitary leaching galleys; public water service connection, new storm water control structures for roof runoff and driveway runoff; approximately 690 cubic yards of clean material from the excavated' areas will be used to fill the site to the proposed grades; and all mechanical equipment (i.e. A/C unit), to be located above the second-story structure. Located: 1925 North Sea Drive" Southold. SCTM# 1000-54-4-20 Type of area to be impacted: Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: Chapt.275 Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: Wetland Coastal Erosion Amendment Administrative Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Notice of Hearing card posted on property: °/ Yes No Not Applicable Info needed/Modifications/Conditions/Etc.: 111, 11 ji ILL IJI ;51 1]1:11 11 Lt Present Were: V/a Goldsmith '"✓ , r ski E. Se enoski p L. Gillooly E. Pee les p (1 UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW.(2)DISTANCI.S SHOWN HEREON FROM PROPERTY LINES TO EKISPNG STRUCTURES ARE FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND ARE NDT TO BE USED TO ESTABLISH PROPERTY ONES OR FOR ERECTION OF FENCES.(7)COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP l r BEARING THE LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR EMBOSSED SEK SMALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY.(4)CERTIFICATION INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY IS PREPARED AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE TITLE COMPANY,GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON,AND TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTITUTION.CERTIFICATIONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE TO ADDITIONAL INSTITUTIONS OR SUBSEQUENT OWNERS. (5)THE LOCATION OF WELLS(W),SEPTIC TANKS(ST)k CESSPOOLS(CP)SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND OR DATA OBTAINED FROM OTHERS NLOT COVERAGE TEST HOLE 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 114101 tel, 631.727.2303 fax. 631.727.0144 BY McDONALD GEOSCIENCE admin® oun en ineerin PROPOSED DATE:11/20/20 y g g gcom FRAME HOUSE 6L GARAGE = 2,445 SF EL=5.!56 0.0' RAISED DECK = 1,474 5F PALE BROWN i� POOL = 522 SF FINE TO COARSE SAND Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor STORAGE SHED = 100 SF W/10% E , FRONT ENTRY STAIRS =663 SF GRAVEL Thomas G. Wolpert, Professional Engineer DRIVEWAY =4,095 SF (SW) Douglas E. Adams, Professional Engineer Robert G. Tost Architect 00 TOTAL= 9,299 SF=15.8% O GW=1.55 a.z J �6, s / /' A WATER IN PALE Robert 5tromski, Architect O �� �' iF 4.60 BROWN FINE TO COARSE S �° ij �♦ (�� W/o° SITE DATA / // ® ; , ♦ P/z. GRAVEL •°"'l Q ppb ' f 4M /yj (SW) AREA = 1.3530 ACRES OR 58,936 SQ. FT. °`, ♦♦ �/j'o 11.0' *BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS BOUNDARY LINES SHOWN AS SCALED FROM FLOOD s®s ' x oo '! o �Q SJ• how \G6�c INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL NO.36103CO154 H LAST DATED SEPT.25,2009. +9.77 �P/� �os oho ♦♦ �Q�` * VERTICAL DATUM =NAVD 1988 s° /i// // /!/ \� h9�'J�L o Pei,�o"/ 0006y \PnJ * DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (4 FT +8.59 /.1-5.05 ,/ , Gs /e, � \ HIGHEST EXPECTED GROUND WATER ELEVATION = 1.7 O� P`J� ,' �� '� s / ! /' �° /� c -�/ � T^�, s°tip ♦ / * NUMBER OF BEDROOMS(DESIGN EQUIVALENT) =4 P / V ��'•�' � s , / O /' Q ^J o♦'�P \ MINIMUM REQUIRED I/A OWTS CAPACITY =440 GAL +8.75 0, h� i o� ♦ * PROVIDED I/A OWTS CAPACITY =500 GAL �l. /' /' ` /, j Q°��°PC�i`G/ �, /' �/ 4C STP -- +3.90 f 1 � // �' ' s®s ' i� QQ �P�( 941 � , '' SP �'Q(.� -\♦i ♦� * LEACHING SYSTEM REQUIRED =300 SFSWA +8 .27 / 2g �p0 * LEACHING GALLEYS PROVIDED = 318 SFSWA or a , / o +8.19 +9.37 / ,' / ♦ // ,/ /� ,� +8.95 q ;k<[. , P� / +9.34 ' 'i P ,, ® s' Sb6 c,Q�� P�ti° ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION �� !+ +8.51 , / J P� / ♦ Q O �>w�n / / , Q Q 4# / / / / ' / �A' `7`'�� / Q�c�,P� "I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WATER SUPPLY(S)AND/OR SEWAGE DISPOSAL / O �, s, / h / o ° , / / �P / \` /� s ♦�o yC ,,J b� SYSTEM(S)FOR THIS PROJECT WERE DESIGNED BY ME OR UNDER MY �A, "IV ° ! ' r ' (� ' �� �.9 a s,5�� ,' ,� ti Q, ° Q DIRECTION.BASED UPON A CAREFUL AND THOROUGH STUDY Z3F-THE�SOIL, / O O ,� g ,saf +s,.5s ��r �, ^� �o ♦� > s - , o�� G P SITE AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS,ALL FACILI S;,AS PRbP.OD � I/ '�, h �J %b• ♦^i �':. b ,_`� 7.21 a R , PQ�J !� / O ♦, ti b x s _ e O P CONFORM TO THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT 1 EAC'H�ERVICES:.r, Q i `°' , ' ----- OQ ° �ti O fi"7.05 ai Qs �c �' / / O O t, i / / O�' 6' g 8• A LF f �' PQ CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS IN EFFECT AS OF S D. R, ° `r i / +3.04 QQ Q 7� ,� o• / +6.18 RO +6.33, /L O / P P ' P` i // �/ ,/ _` b �G +,a t2 r o 9y vP v�IA�O t fi Qj ®' i'/ / � <C.O \� + .36 \ °C5 A--�l y �g'/t G +8.37 S�� �+ 32 01 s/ i °h / 1 / / l Q �° �P,o lot ,� � ♦/I�1 °31/ °i/�, k, i,i'j//,%/j,/i,'////,/// ,/////'/ // �� / Q/0�Cn�Q„/.c/SL/�'',//'/o///////,,,/1/////l////r r/X/-tipo's`'o� QQ Q w3 L��t. ti •; �/ b 'ar//® a (1� +5.30 h 7l Ab +4 IPF440.20 ss +6.39/ � b1 ° % .55 7.59 .408 + ° +50, +6 .55 , /./C\/�♦�C���I\`�y�`�Qti1 HOW�+A,,`s'RdD.�W,.rY:a-Oe�.U*,.�N�Ga�,•N•.Y./S+.,L.S.�NO.45 O.458✓�93n Ix 7.68+ /h A25 THOMAS C.WOLPERT,N.Y.S.P.E.N0.61483 7.7410DOUGLAS E.ADAMS,N.Y.S.P.E.NO.80897\' ° +8.64 cg^s'w'?�c�..A�a®'ay��s:`r•AA.°.''.6.°..sGm.µtt.,":t• p'.�=,J`�,<rt✓,' • '.r tY y 1I _. ._._ 9.15 +5.52,_ Of °[� ° X5.98 0.00 ' /' / +7 81 //:,� ��(8• j �� �I 7.64 7:/7. ® 7 x i N ti �,, /• /C_ 9 " 561 � 7.56 cMF SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION�- N °� /' / / °� Q / t / / „ ? y9 6 .•.A / +5.4 +6.9 / / S /� . s x . - .� \ti , / ♦ WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THI5 SURVEY WAS PREP41 D IN ACCOR�14�C Q° +8.86 /f ! tgOr "g6O/ORy i /r90D� ' FQ �. % ' , X8.10 / / O G\ o '% WITH THE CODE OF PRACTICE FOR LAND 5URVEYSAD'OPTED BY THE NEW YdFK vi QQ' O / / ) i�L` f/ �ti• r ) h 7.34 oN , d 1 r, �• 5, K sl y 1 / / \ STATE ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL LAND IAURVEVORS. �,C14 _ //' b al52 e��sr '�\ .o, � P xh• I� � ♦ vt '` !' }, K \ N +7.9 / ' 1 I ,�� / ,� , y s pQ c�,�5\P+S.s / �. / 1106P o '"JAG, +8. a 411 ��E'/� , 9 00Cy®� 5`� oQ .� 01 +8.45 /a h / O /� '� KQ7' v S°• I b �/ Q DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS Bo ho 2 ,/ %�+4.40 / /\/qv,' ' �h 4) c�0 \ /Xb• a (�+ /4 HOWARD W.YOUNG, Y 5.L.S.N 5893 >� DRIVEWAY AREA 1 REQUIRED 'iJ o J`o„ X`+ 7.15 9'31 2,145 SF x 2/12 x 0.6 = 215 CF �?i,� qIgh9 P,,/ 7.9s 7.79 / 'o /�> cp v 0 g� ,�'� �v R " f �' PROVIDED ,o o,, y ' ) ;;/ j/ ti W � �R , !'� � 1 SURVEY FOR USE NEW DW#1: �i6 j P�� s.ss i ) ` 'i�/�\ TO h0 / �'/ / // `Ol` 2 10' DIA.x2' DEEP DRYWELLS = 274 CF c '8 • / �/ O h / �' Ja ��`` REALTY, ee `['� ,(2) `fjQ �0 6.87 ��5.11 X\ DRIVEWAY 5 3 MV ��^� I �° DRIVEWAY AREA 2 REQUIRED e�J Q�'q 1,533 SF x 2/12 x0.6 = 153 CF Q��'F F� ` .��\x� A o,�oRti �'EEy , N \ o PROVIDED 4P +5.43 S 5.43 55r- 5.56/"lo,, �' 7324 Qt Southold, Town of Southold N USE NEW DW#2 / , 10' DIA.x3' DEEP DRYWELL = 205 CF `�\\ ` q °v BF A /�'L / HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE Suffolk County, New York CO N ROOF AREA 1 REQUIRED Q C� 916 SF x 2/12 x 1.0 = 153 CF s ti QP J`o Rr/(L 1F 'WSF 5.s4 // ' BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY PROVIDED USE NEW DW#3 7.074 ,/ / / County Tax Mop District 1000 Section 54 Block 04 Lot 20 0 10' DIA.x3' DEEP DRYWELL = 205 CF �`�jP`` / 7.13/7.E4 FIELD SURVEY COMPLETED NOV. 25,2020 ROOF AREA 2 REQUIRED / MAP PREPARED JUN.25,2021 740 SF x 2/12 x 1.0 = 123 CF QP / / Record of Revisions PROVIDED REVISION DATE USE NEW DW#4 �A ^ 8' DIA.x3' DEEP DRYWELL = 127 CF /�` / � NOIR#1 NOV.12 2021�// ' e�.r w NOIA APR.20,2022 APR.27,2022 a� ROOF AREA 3 REQUIRED / ' `O� ♦ o fo 7005Fx2/12x1.0 =117 CF ��/ O \ �T) aF= PROVIDED1� , / ♦ ( o 0 USE NEW DW#5 1/ ' - -5-0 8' DIA.x3' DEEP DRYWELL = 127 CF '� / \ -3 CIOrLu m ROOF AREA 4 REQUIRED Do ' / ' 30 0 15 30 60 90 0 906 SF x 2112 x 1.0 =151 CF 9 PROVIDED / s 0 i 3�' USE NEW DW#6 $CQIe: 1�� = 8' DIA.x4' DEEP DRYWELL = 169 CF / JOB NO.2020-0153 DWG.2020_0153_bp 1 OF 2 (1)UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW.(2)DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON FROM PROPERTY LINES TO EMSTING STRUCTURES ARE FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND ARE NCT TO BE USED TO ESTABLISH PROPERTY LINES OR FOR ERECTION OF FENCES.(3)COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING THE LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY.(4)CERTIFICATION INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY IS PREPARED AND ON MS BEHALF TO THE TITLE COMPANY,GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON,AND TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDINO INSTITUTIDN CIRTIFICATIONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE TO ADDITIONAL INSTITUTIONS OR SUBSEGUENT OWNERS. (5)THE LOCATION OF WELLS(W'),SEPTIC TANKS(ST)&CESSPOOLS(CP)SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND OR DATA OBTAINED FROM OTHERS. METER -1/2' VENTILATION PIPE CHAMBER Volume(gal) INCOMING SERVICE SCUM BAFFLE B Ql Sedimentation Chamber 277 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11401 --�"-10 n Anaerobic Filtration Chamber 278 DEDICATED tel. 631.'72?.2303 fax. 651.'72?.0144 -10 '-� -o U Aerobic Contact Filtration Chamber 127 15 AMP BREAKER admin�youngengineering.eom ECIRCULATION Storage Chamber 63 4�t _ AIR LIFT PUMP Disinfection Chamber 4 K DISINFECTION Total Volume 749 120V AG, 10, bOHZ, 15 AMP POWER SUPPLY !!ll !J © CYLINDER (OPTIONAL) MAIN #12-2 AWG WITH 6ND IN I" PVC CONDUIT Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor 4' INLET PI ' OUTLET PIPE SPECIFICATIONS SERVICE Tyromas G. Wolpert, Professional Engineer A 4 A Anaerobic Media PP/PE Filling Rate 32% PANEL Douglas E. Adams, Professional Engineer 4'-0 - ® Board'Type erobic Media PVC/PP/PE Filling Rate 16% Aerobic Media PP/PE FillingRate 57% Robert tr Talo, Architect Robert Stromski, Architect Blower 2.8 clip HARDWIRE FFLUENT Tank FRP INLET BAFF © AIR LIFT PUMP O i" � Piping PVC/PP/PE Access Covers Plastic/Cast Iron Disinfectant(optional) Chlorine Tablets - HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE RECIRCULATION PIPELOW BAFFLE _J /2' AIR INTAKE GROUND 5JE RHOMBUS AIR BLOWER °"" 0`"0" FLOW OPENING (TYP. (CLEANING OPENING) B CONTROL PLAN VIEW PANEL 4' MANHOLE 18' MANHOLE (TYP 18' MANHOLE (TY P 24' MANHOLE (TYP ISINFECTION ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE DIAGRAM CYLINDER (OPTIONAL) LOW OPENING 12' OARD TYPE NOTES: CONTACT MEDIA WL I Ml 1tr _ I. CONCRETE 4,000 PSI ® 28 DAYS 2. REBAR TO BE ASTM A-615 GRADE " 60 ® ! 5. WELDED WIRE FABRIC A5TM A-185 4. DESIGNED FOE AA5HTO HS-20 ® LOADING 5'-5' T ® 5'-5' ECIRCULATION 5. TOP SLAB AND WALL ARE ASSEMBLY MONOLITHIC 7'-10" 4'-4 4'_3k © 4'-26' 8,6„ 6. THE SIDEWALL AREA SHALL BE EQUAL TO THE FULL EXTERNAL WALL �3 10 DIA. FIFE KNOCKOUT TOP VIEW© G-16HT OF THE PRECAST LEACHING(EACH SIDE) HWLsZ N EROBIC MEDIA -8" ERATION ASSEMBLY SECTION A-A VIEW SECTION B-B VIEW `° ® ®® 4'-1"--{ � 4'-g" FUJICLEAN U5A CEN-5 LEAGHIN6 HOLE LEA END VIEW LEACHING GALLEY NT5 ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION I FUJI GLEAN INLET PIPE "I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WATER SUPPLY(S)AND/OR SEWAGE DISPOSAL 10 UPSTREAM F- CONTROL PANEL MOUNTED NOTE: ALL CONDUITS SYSTEM(S)FOR THIS PROJECT WERE DESIGNED BY ME OR UNDER MY OI WYE II N BETWEEN PANEL AND DIRECTION.BASED UPON A CAREFUL AND THOROUGH STUDY,-OFTHE•SOIL, GLEAN-OUT z ON 4x4 PRESSURE SITE AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS,ALL FACILI�S,AS PROPOSED 1 z 0 TREATED WOOD POSTS TREATMENT TANK MUST BE W w ALARM/CONTROL SEALED TO PREVENT GAS CONFORM TO THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT F'HEAL`TH SERVICES';',. ❑ -I_ PANEL MDL#10414'72 LEAKAGE INTO PANEL. " ®' N 0 "A" AIR BLOWER CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS IN EFFECT AS OF 5 D irt.,';:,i�. l.iRjtt,, CONTROLLER 5N MFG BY 5JE RHOMBUS FOR WIFI COMMUNICATION IL w p INSULATED WEATHER DEVICE; o \ V SISTANT BLOWER o ^ (Atg v1\ ENCLOSURE USE ALARM/CONTROL N PANEL MDL#1045040 CONTROLLER G MFG BY GLEANOUT � II II- �' �• �«. c''R�..y. -�`..o a,�t. � 5JE RHOMBUS HOWARD W.YOUNG,N.Y.S.L.S.NO.45893n �:`tG�;4.��,�.,• ��;';�' THOMAS C.WOLPERT,N.Y.S.P.E.N0.61483 z DOUGLAS E.ADAMS,N.Y.S.P .N0.80897 �` "`'A•"n+c e'°{' '` A 5INEEP MAY BE USED z BETWEEN WYE AND CLEANOUT r�i AIR LINE TO FUJIGLEAN OWT5 F1= SURVEY FOR IN. GRAD 2 STORY INLET LATERAL TO FUJI CLEAN UNIT FRAME HOUSE SCALE: NTS TELECLLL TRIC SUPPLY MKS REALTY, LLC. ON PILES SWEET AIR VENT GAP ELECTRICAL TO BLOWER (4 BEDROOMS) MFG BY 7UF-71TE SUPPLY O FUJIGLEAN FFEL=16.75 (5' MIN FROM ANY OWTS SPLICE BOX DOOR OR WINDOW) CONTROL PANEL 4 BLOWER at Southold, Town of Southold 16' 5' 11' SCALE: NT5 Suffolk County, New York 4" PVC @ 4" PVC (P 4" PVC N 2.0090 MIN. 1.009c MIN. 1.0090 MIN. NOTES BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY C4 RISERS S COVERS _z WITH SAFETY LIDS LOGKIN6 I. THE OWT5 SHALL BE MODEL GEN-5 MANUFACTURED BY MFG BY TUF-TITE OR CASTING TO FUJIGLEAN USA. County Tax Mop District 1000 Section 54 Block 04 Lot 20 C3 APPROVED EQUAL GRADE 1- 2. THE DESIGN ENGINEER, FUJIGLEAN USA REPRESENTATIVE, FIELD SURVEY COMPLETED NOV. 25,2020 EL=10. RIM=B.'7 RIM=8.5 EL-8 2 AND 5G1;IH5 REPRESENTATIVES SHALL OBSERVE THE MAP PREPARED JUN.25,2021 - INSTALLATION OF THE OWTS AND LEAGHIN6 SYSTEM. PRECAST APPROVAL FROM ALL THREE PRIOR TO BACKFILL. Record Of RZVISIOCIS ( GONG. COVER TOP 5LAB � - ----------AIR LINE-- -� IE=6.55 0 O 5. THE SYSTEM START UP WILL BE COMPLETED UNDER THE REVISION DATE �5 VENT DIRECT SUPERVISION OF A FUJIGLEAN USA NOIA#1 NOV.12,2021 HOLE IE=6.04 IE=5,44 REPRESENTATIVE. NOIA(APR.20,2022) APR.27,2022 IE=6.21 IE=5.48 IE=5.57 CONNECT 5" PVC `" 4. AN EXECUTED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CONTRACT VENT LINE TO VENT SEE DETAIL FOR _4F BOT=5.70 BETWEEN THE MAINTENANCE PROVIDER AND PROPERTY HOLE IN OW5T OWTS COMPONENTS POURED INVERT I OWNER MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE SUFFOLK COUNTY PROVIDE GLEAN OUT AT DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES (5GDH5) PRIOR TO FACE OF BUILDING 4' DIA. DISTRIBUTION BOX H16HE5T EXPECTED 6W EL=I.-7 APPROVAL OF THE I/A OWTS REGISTRATION BY THE a BOT EL 1.50 5CDH5 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE I4 OF THE SUFFOLK m AIR LINE TO BLOWER PROVIDE END GAP LEVELING DEVICE (U555 LONG ISLAND DEPTH TO WATER VIEWER 2013 COUNTY SANITARY GODS. MDL#5L-4 MFG BY TUF-TITE OR INDICATES GROUND WATER AT ELEVATION 61) 5 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION(S) TO BE VERIFIED BY THE 500 GAL. I/A OWT5 APPROVED EQUAL FOR ALL SANITARY LEAGHIN6 GALLEY MDL. GEN-5 MFG. BY FUJIGLEAN USA DISTRIBUTION BOX OUTLET PIPES ARCHITECT. a TOTAL OF (b) GALLEYS 518 5F5WA JOB NO. 2020-0153 DWG. 2020_0153_bp 2 OF 2 DIRECTORY PLOT PLAN " CLIENT: PLOT PLAN LEGEND I 1 MR. &MRS.TONY VOURNOU SITUATED IN THE 77 SSET.NEW YO ROAD TOWN OF SOUTHHOLD 77 ME&F,NEW YORK 77791 BUILDABLE AREA ENGINEER SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK R SHATARAH CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.C. RUDOLPH S.SHATARAH P.E. LONG I S LAND SOUND NON-BUILDABLE AREA 6500 JERICHO TURNPIKE 516 731-4687 R SLkQ .H covsuLTLNCF>,6nTrxs ec SYOSSEF,NY 11791 FAX 516 796-2744 NOTES: 6500 JE ICHO TURNPIKE • ALL INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM: ® SILT FENCE LOCATION SUITE tW LANDSCAPE DESIGNER U(516),31-468NY 1 SURVEY PREPARED BY TIE LINE ALONG APPROXIMATE LIMIT LINE OF WORK TEL:(516)731-4687 CMA GROUP 631 675 6214 YOUNG&YOUNG HIGH WATER MARK AS LOCATED FAX(516)796-2744 2100 JOSHUAS PATH DATED:DEC.10,2020 BY US ON 11/25/20 TIE LINE ALONG APPROXIMATE RUDOLPHORSCE-PC.COM S SHATARAH,P.E. HAUPPAUGE.NY 11788 PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LOW WATER MARK AS LOCATED WWW.RSCE-PC.COM LAND SURVEYOR 400 OSTRANDER AVE.,RIVERHEAD NY 11901 _ f1140D28'S9"E BY US ON 11/25/20 200.04' F rle`w; YOUNG&YOUNG LAND SURVEYOR 631 727 2303 • FLOOD INSURANCE RATE PANEL -----• - ------- _.______.___ ,�E.`„_ 400 OSTRANDER AVE. FAX 631 727 0144 -------------.-_ /r,- /� RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 11901 NO.36103CD154H LAST UPDATED 9/25/2009 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER • VERTICAL DATUM=NAN DATUM(1988) � 3 CMA GROUP 631 675 6214Z 2100 JOSHUAS PATH FAX 631 675 0364 • ZONING USE DISTRICT=R-40 y HAUPPAUGE,NY 11788 0 • LOT AREA=58,936 S.F. 0 DRAWING LIST I_ BEACH o 1MIM PUM AK AN OF O 4 m Q� FLOOD BOUNDARY LINE Sam LLD THE PRWOBY M• A1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET tj 0 AS SCALED FROM FLOOD VU.B A1.1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN I N i INSURANCE MAPS IT 6 A MON OF SMODN 7=2 o Or TIE WW YORK SIRE LMEVON A1.2 PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM DETAILS 20NE__,-yE(EL.1s) I I I mrsm v�w�ro A1.3 GENERAL NOTES A3 GENERAL NOTES ZONE CIF W O / ��NC SF AL CODE COMPLIANCE DETAILS v DMEIR 5 ATTM Is E Alum ao A A7.5 CODE COMPLIANCE EDGE OF BEACH GRASS �5- C DGNEEWAMN SHgL IW.FSDL AN By At.6 WINDOW&DOOR SCHEDULES a sF v SM A3.0 PROPOSED PILE FOUNDATION PLAN Q rQ I S �'---- 7t N TTERTHE N113MON SHNL BEOCW IND A SPE=DCMWIDN WBA A3,1 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN O •oe 'Ao �----� 'es L 3 A3.2 PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN @ S A3.3 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN I S A3.4 PROPOSED OPEN AIR GAZEBO _` -- - _0 S 0 41 / T A4.0 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS A 61 a (� O ti A4.OA PROPOSED ELEVATION -71 ~ , A4.1 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS O 0 � ' •o I I ,e (3 8 � O O S f A5.0 PROPOSED BUILDING SECTION 3 �O I I •�O t � ' A5.1 PROPOSED BUILDING SECTIONS A5.2 BUILDING SECTION DETAILS cr O 0017 I I O A5.3 ELEVATOR DETAILS fl) SIDE YARD MIN. T9 I I A6.0 FOUNDATION REFLECTED CEILING PLAN BEACH GRASS A6.1 FIRST FLOOR REFLECTED CEILING PLAN O •00. B I I J 01 A6.2 SECOND FLOOR REFLECTED CEILING PLAN 'A I I IT A7.0 FOUNDATION POWER&COMMUNICATION PLAN SIDE YAR' MIN. (p A7.1 FIRST FLOOR POWER&COMMUNICATION PLAN (D 6 I I •a A7.2 SECOND FLOOR POWER&COMMUNICATION PLAN S1.0 PILE FOUNDATION STRUCTURAL PLAN AG 'yj �0 •O 9 A o S1.1 FIRST FLOOR STRUCTURAL PLAN S1.2 SECOND FLOOR STRUCTURAL PLAN I ��__--- •AJS Q \ rt O j s gm s w e I � •so � PROJECT LIMITING FENCE& I LL w J J' 0 HAYBALES ALONG LIMIT OF o 8Q ��i/ 50�-- 0 ? 'O e I I (() 00 CLEARING,GRADING AND I Q oOL O o /'tZ'�OQ O •� •o d I I N GROUND DISTURBANCE.SEE I LU y e TEST HOLE Qo C-� '� a 9 ; e ; I ;, DETAIL#4/A1-2. i V Q 0'n o N Qj BY McDONALD GEOSCIENCE 0 8 •4'y I (p I W¢"=n DATE:06/17/06 @ OL 8 ? A I �� p w z < EL=6.45' 0.01 ��_ I ! o o o aI FLOOD BOUNDARY LINE 7 0I '6 W rrn N FPALE BROWN '0o FINE TO 6INSURANCE MAPS o=O •0yzCOARSE zr W3 z SAND o h(SW) ZONE VE(EL-13) 0POOL f ZUl W I GW=1.65' 4.6' ) i DRAWING ABBREVIATIONS ZONE AE(EL-12) 8j PROJECT: NAME WATER IN 2 STORY + S 00 _ _ _ _ I•S I j ' PALE BROWN FRAME •0 -- - `-_--�-- - - I. ( REVISIONS FINE TO A 61 'S S Y ! 2 STORY AWL AODTTIONLL IN. PEH(6) HOUSE .0 .� O I ALLOW. AUOWASLE Mo. 1F60 TGN COARSE .a A S + 0 Q I A9 I COC FRAME #DATE REVISIONS TIM. ALUImIW NORQ. HON60HTA SANG d '�� m W HOUSE 72BF12 ED PER 6URVEYO LH-.. BlD7(J2 fiEVLSf3)FFTiCOATA@fT5 AFT. ABOVE FVASH FLOOR HT. HEIGHTS S W tD W. BOARD WNW.SOL BARRIER JSTS. 'MMkNUFFACTURER ( � 17.0' �L' , a,mmmum0 s SAND, LOW BRUSH�tT9 OISTS ''o p BLL BEAM MIN MINMM i !y SCATTERED TREES i ! BTHRM. BATHROOM ML MIMIAI JOST o I CLO. CONTIG NOY. NOLOUL \J G CLOS CLOSET O.C. ON CONDI a@ @ F S S 11 L^ CONI. CONCRETE OP'G. OPENOO R CONC. CONCRETE PLYW0. PLYWOOD I S O 1 GA CORK CORRIDOR PROP. PROPOSED I . DILL MLBxvoN PTD. PANTED 1,775' TO KENNEY'S ROAD s ey a oA LL �1 1 DRAWING R0. ROUND -L----��'------- --------- -- ---J- - - ' -`- - - - --- - ---.._..__-- FA FAWN RLL ROOM .-__-_.-__--_-.._..-.-_-__--..- a". ELEVATION R.O. RDWH OPENING A S o L L Dw. DOSTO:G RED 0. REQUIRED y' S.,7t.�1�4 AA'Vf M-) �/Y l/Y IXT. DaMOR SR STEEL T v -7 -61 ttA 202 FAL FRESH AIR INTAKE ST.SR STATNSS STEEL A A A O AUG FIX FOUNDATION TV. TYPICAL FLPL FLOOR TWL THICK •jam •OQ .�� EOP 'A ; DATE CO MENT FT. FOGT/FEET U.OJL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 7T ISS 77 ; IANWARD LIMIT OF NATURAL B/+M2+ PROG SS PRINT FM MOMA•4. PROTECTIVE FEATURE AREA LINE v+4riz EDP COMMENTS FOOTM W/ WITH U L A 7t NORTH SEA DRIVE AS SCALED FROM COASTAL W.eo. GYPSUM BOARD V.T.R. VENT TO ROOF @ S EROSION HAZARD AREA MAP Southold Town Board of Trustees SYMBOLS LIST DE'0Il NUYfiER DOAL NUYBER --"- -------------- ------- PROJECT N0. 21J50-0D ��� DATE: 05.08-21 -X -_---- - I DRAWN BY: KJS DWS NUMBER DWG.NUMB RCHECKED BY; I t MUDDING SMMN/ELLYATGN sEC11DN DEfAL , IXSISTING PLOT PLAN SCALE: AS SHOWN SCALE 1•c 2OL0• NOTEFORCOMRACTUt { -O ALTRADES AREOBEGIEOTOREVIEW.NEFER TO ANO CIES UWfILIT KOFREOMW 6ETANDPROIECTAIANVA PACKAGE PMRTO BEOLNNINO ANY WORKANY DISCREPANLIE6 DUE TO A LACKOF C0.05SlIUDECOOROINATIINJ WRHTHE ENRRE DOCUMENT SET WRL OE REPAIRED.REPLACED OR RHNSTALLEO ATIHAT CONIMGTOR'6 SOLE EJ(PENBE ZONING INFORMATION PROPOSED PLOT PLAN ZONING CALCULATIONS L O N G I S L A N D S O U N D SITE PLAN LEGEND Igroup w,,��.NSW,,,oATTwNFx.,-•w�=�D,AEFORRF�IODRwoarA PROPOSED BUILDING DISTRICT R-40 REQUIRED SECTION TOTAL PROVIDED LOT SIZE 40,000 S.F. 280 ATCH 1:1 58,936.00 S.F. CONFORMS THE LINE ALONG APPROXIMATE LOT WIDTH 150.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 200.00 FT. CONFORMS HIGH WATER MARK AS LOCATED ® SILT FENCE LOCATION LOT DEPTH 175.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 296.57 FT. CONFORMS BY US ON 71/25/20 mNssint�.ATR,,A,R�APC H FRONT YARD 50.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 67.83 FT. CONFORMS LIMIT LINE OF WORK 6500 J7LICH0 NRNPINE SIDE YARD 15.00 FT 280 ATCH 3:1 39.75 FT. CONFORMS SUITE IW AGGREGATE SIDE YARD 35.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 84.00 FT. CONFORMS N40D28'59"E TEL:(516)SY0SSE7731'4687 REAR YARD 50.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 186.75 FT. CONFORMS _ --_ 200.04 FAX(516)786-27H RUDOLPHORSCE-P000N ..-.--.---.------------�- RUDOLPH S SHATARAH.P.E MAXIMUM PERMITTED DIMENSIONS: WWW'FtSCE-PC.COM LOT COVERAGE 20%(11,787.20 S.F.) 280 ATCH 3:1 16%(9,385.2 FT.) CONFORMS BUILDING HEIGHT 35.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 35.00 FT. CONFORMS 3- NUMBER NUMBER OF STORIES 2 112 280 ATCH 3:1 2 CONFORMS '�:°.�•- `;�'��` FIRST FLOOR AREA: ° PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR 2,231.7 S.F. O° BEACH " PROPOSED FRONT ENTRANCE IMPERVIOUS 662.8 S.F. ,'gip,• PROPOSED GARAGE 538.3 S.F. 0) w 4 PROP.FIRST FLOOR EXT.DECK 2,071.9 S.F. 0 a) FLOOD BOUNDARY LINE iv O MEZZANINE FLOOR AREA: ZONE VE(EL-16) AS SCALED FROM FLOOD 0 PROPOSED MASTER BEDROOM 655.7 S.F. INSURANCE RATE MAP IM Rus ARE AN P6TRRO L BE of ZONE VE _ SMVI E AM AfQ TIE PRaRRR OF (EL-13) -�_ PRoDOM 7¢MTrm ..................„...............,. R 6 A 1NIX R UTE ]7m2 SECOND FLOOR AREA: 1,924.2 S.F. EDGE F BEACH GRASS -`5� I THE rEr OI N,Ul l moH �1 w R7L AM(POISON,Dm[a TIEY 0 _ Lc /CIYC IP0p1 ppFDIGI W A &7m A PmlI N Pt D. F TD O `--- _-.--._,��--�_ ALTD7 NK RE11 N N!!NW. i ANP 4,811.6 S.F. DDmot a UTO, Temic xTmNc COMPLETE FLOOR AREA TOTAL �QANTu OF m Ly .ye s S�9 s �'- .- �_ " 012M 9WL ARM HIS 4N.M A WIXM'ALTERED BY FOULDIND BY HS SEWURE AND 09E Or SUCH OPEN AIR GAZEBO 0 ALTDLDDN AND A SUM DLY WMN LOT COVERAGE-BREA DO qq 0 M ALTIRM sll E mum DWELLING(WOOD FRAME 2,444.9 S.F. L/ q$ x 6 •rQ tb W/STAIRS TO GRADE _ M ) Aa RAISED DECK 1,218.8 S.F. AND STORAGE BELOW ea 7 x I (NO WATER/SEWER) POOL 521.6 S.F. •' I ' CATWALK ABOVE GAZEBO 127.9 S.F. O Q GAZEBO STORAGE 110.6 S.F. C B'o 8 'a I GRADE O \ CAT WALK 203.6 S.F. 3 G x x I x., 7 � , x e l x CATWALK W/PILING l FRONT ENTRY STEP SYSTEM 662.8 S.F. 0 ?oy, - _ 0 °r .s SUPPORTS y 0 I DRIVEWAY + 4,095.3 S.F. DASHED LINE OF -9 •Z BEACH GRASS I SECOND FLOOR 0 M m PROPOSED POOL R i LOT COVERAGE TOTAL (16%)9,385.2 S.F. BALCONY ABOVE 8 I m PROVIDE ACCESS TO O O LOT AREA 58,936.00 S.F. go mg ' x x + POOL DRAIN FOR x MAINTENANCE. m ~ DASHED LINE OF I I x < (� o .� s BFT.DIA.X 4FT. l `�� DEEP SWIMMING AMOUNT OF FILL REQUIRED 270.00 CY. O.H.ABOVE. ' � _--___-_-___ 9 _J \ � 3 (FILL TO BE CLEAN BANK-RUN SAND AND GRAVEL FROM APPROVED UPLAND SITE) �e e� - _ - - \ POOL BACKWASH f7 SPIRAL STAIR �- _ -Q 7 SYSTEM. FROM ABOVE. i� i - ---- °i Q) BUILDING AREA: i ;•.,T L•� ,�_ \ POOL EQUIPMENT Q N -r •? - x LOCATED UNDER DECK 0 FIRST FLOOR 2,231.7 S.F. rt (n i ens ! ��^^�•T I x GROUND LEVEL o MASTER SUITE FLOOR 655.7 S.F. �� \ (' i s ( ) x SECOND FLOOR 1,924.2 S.F. V `' _ a . x i y - ,Pa RESIDENTUIL BACKUP 0 ! o}m i x ; ------' _• I I N UNDER DECKLOCATED rt j Z m J _ eGENERATOR SCHEDULE FOR OPEN SPACE AS PER 280 ATTACHMENT 6 + 5 ' - ® •• •d - M'- 5 PROPOSED 1200 GAL. LL r SIZE OF LOT(<15 AC) 58,936.00 1.35 AC CONFORMS ter•' -••-•••-••••-•••••'•' -• - - .�- o O }78 6g MINIMUM OPEN SPACE 20% 000.0 S.F. CONFORMS m - - - ��: ,P I (O m UNDERGROUND I w MINIMUM SET BACK 30 000.0 FT. CONFORMS ' ' PROPANE TANK QW MINIMUM BUFFER 20 000.0 FT. CONFORMS LIMIT OF cr d c� 7 co - - ,NAt,,,;; .:,L•,;< -,; I RAISED DECK STEPS j LU y ~ PROPOSED FILL coNRL } ':` `:'t` - „+.,..,A' ¢•-,,,. ••`t, a I ( d v o wN a „g ) &RAILING TO GRADE j U o n o fA APPROX.890 C - ... ,re, Zo�=o v FD Loa Lae 9 .,..,. Ik: ....".'•. x PROPOSED 2-STORY W S cl xin a +8.7 y._ I.""•^a-_...",.•. FRAMED DWELLING 0 w Z P-E UJ ZONE VE(EL-13)`I s sx o x i I y m fA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE PANEL No. 36103CO154H LAST UPDATED: 9,25.2009 Loa Loa ---_Y1too 71.36 I on, I ': 8.DECK ON WOOD PILES. W roti a ZONE AE EL-12 + os ( '; (F.F.EL.:16.75) D:o LL D_ ( ) +8.5 6.2s w I y j o=oh O v �1 s' +7.5 +7.36 µi+74 s'Po FLOOD BOUNDARY LINE AS Z m y Fo o O_ I SUBJECT LOT: 1925 NORTH SEA ROAD,SOUTHOLD Is _ -� I G in CONC. SCALED FROM FLOOD SECTION:54 BLOCK:04 LOT(S):227 m s (9 'sa ALL INSURANCE RATE MAP ! PROJECT: DRE° ZONING:RESIDENCE'R-40'DISTRICT 1000 m '3 s ° •° c s>2 I x ; I NOTES I�il 9 N ! +75 +7.3 a� +6.2 v y +7 I. x'`P,r PROJECT LIMITING FENCE 8 REVISIONS • ALL ZONING REFERENCES PER ZONING CODE OF THE m -1 ! 6 ' .3 s a HAYBALES ALONG LIMIT OF #DATE REVISIONS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD N Z 1 +7.3 ss CLEARING,GRADING AND rzan2 SED PER SURVEY c g GROUND DISTURBANCE.SEE &0=REvLsEDPaLcowAwm a THE UNDISTURBED PORTION OF THE SITE SHALL BE >m s ss 6O I MAINTAINED AS A UNDISTURBED BUFFER. < 3 s °^� +7.5 I y, DETAIL#4/A7-2. +6.g -6.8 $ 1 ss I 1 775'TO KENNEYS ROAD - e.......... .?;8.'_ .. 17.8.'.`.. d ....*7 46 + _a__. ........... _...k,_.._............_.._..._..._..._..........._.._..._..._.._.._..._..._. _ ? 00. 01 s A� EDGE OF EXISTING PAVEMENT � +7.2 �o i EOP BTESTDHOLEE s-- ss v a'sa EXISTING UNDERGROUND -WATER MAIN - $ -- - ",s1. DATE:05/11/06EL=6.43' 0.01 N O R T H S E A D R I V E •� - _-- (yamISSUE PALE BROWN 'E-�- E COMMENT FINE TO ,� PROPOSED SITE PLAN 4� ��(///IF% p SCALE 1•=20'-O' LANDSCAPE BOULDERS 19 1 1 PROGRESSPRINT COARSE SAND Fa PLANTINGS fl2 EVIEEO PER COMM (S"Q - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- - - - - -------------------------- GW-1.65' 4.g' '<' WATER IN ({Jl 1 f()r1 _ rj 2O2 PALE BROWN I I IJ FINE TO I I COARSE P OJECT No. 21350-00 SAND ! ! -- DTE: 05-08-21 (SW) ! ! - Southold Town D WN BY: KJS 11'0' j i Board of Trustees: c ECKED BY: SCALE: AS SHOWN I OTE FORCONTRACT TRADESARE REQUIREDTO REVIEW.REFER TO ANDaE IESD EW THE ENTIREDRAWINGGET CANDPROJECTMPNUAL j QACNAOE PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK ANY DISCREPANCIES DUE TO A WCK OF CROSSTRADE COORDWATON WITN THEAl ENURE DOCUMEM SET WILL DE flEPNRED.flEFUCED OR REJNSTALIEDATTNAT CONTRACTORS SOLE ExPFNSE ` � 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 1�I 14-' • 8.-11. 8'-111" 4'- 6•-2}" 6'-0U" 12'-74" � 12'-7j" � 6'-C7j" 6'-2j" 16'-2}" I � I 7'-2- 16 e oa h CONCRETE FTG. R SHATARAH [ONSULY"O ENGLNFIAS.P.0 HEATER 6800,ERICHO TURNPIKE I I I I I I I I I I I III GINE,W I I A T TD1791 :Y(5516) --NY 14687 IEN. PROPOSED FAX(516)796-2744 UP POOL UP Pu No:2 POOL ROUP' RUll S.SRSCE- .-POM I 1006 I I RUDGLPH S SHATARAN,P.E iV P Nat WAWflSCE-PC.COM I III III 1 ALTER •� I PSE LAP I [• I GENERA RESIDENTIAL `. CONCRETE FTG I I GENERATOR GENERATOR e — — — — — — — - - — - 12•-8�5' 9'-0' 12•-0" UPPER LEVEL MASTER BRFAJ(AWAY W000 WALL PER I g •I BEDROOM BALDONY 6'DIA FEW TECHNICAL BUUEM 9. 8 1n SPIRAL STAIR TO GRACE FIGURE 1J&TABLE 1A DECK ABOVE I THESE RA6 AIR AN NSTkApR a SERVICE AID ARL INC PEMFORR'OF TIE DONEEILPINIRING"WILL BE � rt IS A MtlA1WX a SCMN 7219] Y'IIIL`\III+`\/y/IFV\/' R ti THE MEN YM SM EDUCUM POOL DECK w FON G PERSON,CMI THEY yl ABOVE I ARE POFE'�S9dML�BERM TO ALTER ANY IIEY N ANY W. E ANY UPS\ INGINECIR IS IDIOT 71E AUp2NN UNE OF BALL(#Tf ABOVE y SPIRAL SWR TO MASTER BFN a/»c TIE sm off NN XOMTION'ALTERED Dr.FOLLOWED W vJ BALWltt ABOVE OURRIE OF 811111XNC M SIM ATI)HIS SUL AND a AOI HS OF THE°NAT�OA 9WL a P SCREEN WALL EXTERIOR PRNAC'Y SCREEN WALL E —� _ — - - — — ��— ,�._ �, I IDR — -QQ -® — Q— — ,•--- — — • 11 i I I O m BATH UNE OF FOOTING I J ® > I PROPOSED m YEW®Y - I OROPDBED I I I I I ° - '-1 I_ If— W000 FRAMED STAIR n STORAGE ROOY p.O SUB RN.FULL UNE OF BALCONY ABOVE I O OMOE 1$ rI ® — UNE OF WASTER .O sd' i�EL(11.00'I 1 (4•CONE.SUB M RR) BEDROOM ABOVE I _ �2 TAR fNRA1:E _ Rup ,� Y}-CLOS. © (4-OM FWL M) ELEVATOR AWT O•HT.TALL GATE W/SELF OO'=� T I CLOSWG HARDWARE-O - — LINE OF O.H.GARAGE DOOR G.N.UNE OF CANTILEVER 3 m — O O O J — — — — — — — — -IELLVATDR) — E• -- BUOD NG ALiOVE Z Z II TI ow o IMM I, EOERgDY OF ABD I I SD ILII l ' O 02 ooo rr-L W¢(4' STAB M FUEL) aWi Z j f II..I II I DEYMDN A i I EL f1s.8B' UP FROM "E ALL 1W UTS 10 MA �Z=O SCREEND °MN STORM Z 7 Z Z o Q Lu O Z�fIIFO �a 1 -TiIITII EU 47 1 PROJECT: DRAWING z -Y NAME REVISIONS n #DATE REVISIONS WALL AND DOOR LEGEND: UNE OF RADNS WALL ABOVE 7RBR2 RAISED PER SURVEYO NEW 6'POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL-SEE 9D2lf2 ®F� �S GENERAL NOTES B DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 18'WIDE(5 PANEL)OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR WITH DOUBLE-WIDE ANOMM '::�•:i:• ALUMINUM(COLOR:NNIfE)MATH EQUAL PANEL SPACING&3•INSMATED NEW INTERIOR DRYWALL PARTITION(ONE-HOUR FIRE RATED) GLASS-SOLAR BW WHT(CLASS:WHITE LAAINAIID)ARGON FD1ED(R-1.125) 2x4 WD.STUDS @ 1G O.C.W/2•SOLID WD.BLKING AT YANUF.BY WAYNE DALTON GARAGE DOORS OR EOWI.(NOTE WE TO wow INTERMEDIATE WALL HEIGHTS AND ONE LAYER OF518TYPE'X' OF DOOR-REQUIRED FRAME SIZE SHALL BE 6'MIN.)TRACK&BRACKETS SHEETROCK FINISH ON BBA SIDE THIS IS TO INCLUDE THE FOUNDATION NOTES TO BE HFAW-DUTY.PROVIDE SDE MOUNT GARAGE DOOR OPENER.SMART ENTIRE GARAGE CEILING(1)LAYER OF 5f8- U 8•TYPE W SHEETROCK 1. SEE FIRST FLOOR PN FOR TYPE AND LOCATION OF SHEEtR WALL GARAGE DOOR OPENER W/BACKUP BATTERY-MWUF.BY GENIE SIGNATURE NEW INTERIOR DRYWALL PARTITION 2x4 WD.STUDS @ 16' HOLO DOWNS. SERIES-ULTRA D.C.W/112 SHEETROCK FINISH ON BOTH SIDES.SEE PLANS F1EVAlION 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND LNSPECT THE POINT OF THE FOR VARIATION IN WALL THICKNESS. EL:411.]6' CONTACTAT FOUNDATION SUPPORTING COLUMNS AND GIRDERS FOR CRACKS OR OTHER DEFICIENCIES AND ADVISE ENGINEER OF `. '. NEW B•CMU BLOCK FOUNDATION WALLANYISSUE. 3. THE BOTTOM SURFACE OF STEPPED FOOTINGS SHALL NOT W� INTERIOR DOOR E%CEEDASLOPEGREATERTHANIO%ASPERREQUIRWEWSOF 2 I V '1 ISSUE d0.T.1.5 IIFJ� L1VIJ YpF'�"'� 4. BOTTOMOFALLEXTERIORFOOTINGSSHALLBE PLACEDATLEAST DA COMMENT INTERIOR POCKET DOOR 12'BELOW THE UNDISTURBED GROUND SURFACE AS PER 403.1A. 6110 PROGRESS PRINT S. CONTRACTORSHALL VERIFY THE DEPTH AT UNEXCAVATED AREAS 1/14 REVISED PER COMMENT SD/CM COMBINATION SMOKE B CARBON ANDANYFOUNDATION AND FOOTING SUPPORTING ANY NEW O MONOXIDE DETECTOR STRUCTURE AND VERIFY IF THE THICKNESS AS SPECIFIED AND INDICATES LOCATION OF POST LOADING ABOVE ALL DGRAEPTRIO rrHSPFOOTGISATTHERE FOOnUIRED DEPTH(MIN.3'BELOW { AS /�/� POSTS SHALL BE FASTENED TOGETHER 11111'DIA. AND%YABISPREADTSHAPED FOOTINGS NOTIFY THE OWNER �I III_ - 5 2022 O J J AND ENGMEER OF CONDTITONS. AUG LL LAG BOLTS@ 24.O.C. 6. WHERE A SLAB ON GRADE IS SUPPORTED ION BACKFILL.THE FILL SHALL BE COMPACTED IN LAYERS NOT EXCEEDING S'TOAT LEAST 95%OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY PERASTMD-15578 FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE LIMITED TO WELL GRADED SAND OR SAND AND GRAVEL PROJ TND. 21.950-00 MIXTURE WITH LEGS THAN 10-15%FINES PASSING THE NUMBER 200 STAVE AND A MAXIMUM GRAVEL SIZE OF W Southold Town DATE: 05-08-21 7. PROVIDE PERIMETER RIDGED INSULATION FOR ALL FOUNDATION (EXCEPTGARAGE)-SEEDETAIL Board of Trustees DRAW BY: KJS B. PROVIDER!'TIRKEXPANSIONJOIW-PRE-MOULOEDFILLERW/ CHECKED BY: JOINTSEALANTWHERE SLAB MEETS THE FOUNDATION WALL SCALE: AS SHOWN PROPOSED PILE FOUNDATION PLAN 9. ALL NEW CONCRETE FOOTINGS TO BE POURED CONCRETE WffHA MINIMUM OF 3500 PSI.FOOTINGS TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON NOTE FOR CONTRACTOR SCALE 1/4'c 1'_0° UNDISWRBEDVIRGWSOILWITHAMINNUMOFT' BELOWTHE ALTRADESAREREOUIREOTOREVIEW.REFERTOAIOBEFA UARWRHTHE ENTIREDRAWNGSETANDPROJECTMANUAL ��--0 AVERAGE GRADE PACKAGE PRIOR TO SEGIWNO ANY WORK ANY DISCREPANCIES DUE TOA UCN OF CROSSTRADE COaROWAnON WIND THE ENRRE DOCUMENT SET WILL BE REPAIRED.REDUCED OR RNNSTALLED ATTHAT CONTRACTOR'S SOLE EXPENSE W WALL AND DOOR LEGEND: FIRST FLOOR PLAN NOTES: BATHROOM FINISH NOTES: 1. TYPICAL NEWSHEARWALL CORNER HOLDOWNS SHALL BE BY NEW INTERIOR DRYWALL PARTITION 214 WD STUDS SIMPSON STRONG-TIE NO.HDU4 WITH AN ALLOWANCE LOAD" 1. IN BATHROOMS USE 7/16•THK CEMENT BD.ONWALLSADJACENTTO 16.D.C.W/1R SHEETROCK FINISH ON BOTHSIDES. 7,870 LOS/EA(OR EQUAL).SEE FLOOR PLANS FOR LOCATION OF SHOWERS AND TUBS A I7 THK MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP.BD.ON SEE PLANS FOR VARIATION IN WALL THICKNESS. HOLDOWHS. REMAINDER OF WALLS&CLG. SHEIARWALLLOCATION 2, PR OVIDECONTINUOUSWOODHEADERACROSSOPEMNGSTO WINDOWNOTES: CMAgrou SHEAR WALL AT OPENINGS WITHIN Y4)'OF WALL SEE PLANS 8 NEWS'POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL SEE GENER WINDOW/DOOR SCHEDULES FOR HEADER SIZE B LOCATIONS. NOTES B DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL WFORMATION 1. ALLGLAZING INSTALLED IN HA7ARDOUS LOCATIONS AS DEFINED IN ••x NEW INTERIOR DRYWALL PARTTUON(ONE-HOUR FIRE 3. TYPICAL STEEL COLUMNS OF REQUIRED)SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED SECT.R308A OF MY STATE BLDG.CODE SHALL BE W COMPLIANCE W/ $� RATED)2x4 WD.STUDS CO 16'O.C.W/2'SOLID W0. IN GENERAL NOTES STEEL NOTES.VERIFY EXAM LOCATION S SECTION R308 GLAZING. SUN GAT INTERMEDIATE WALL HEIGHTS AND ONE ALL FO TI COLUMN IN THE FIELD.SEE FOUNDATION PLAN FOR LAYER OF BIB TYPE 7C SNEETROCK FINISHONEA.SIDE ALL FODTINGS�S. WWDOWS TOSS VHIGH ALUE RFORMANCE.SKYTYPE,NF RC CERTIFIED WITH V'FACTOR VALUE OF.35 OR LESS.SKYLIGHTS TO BE HIGH NEWEKTERIOR WALL 4. PROVIDE FULL DEPTH SOLID WD.BLOCKING UNDERALL WOOD PERFORMANCE LOW-E TYPE,NFRC CERTIFIED WITH UFACTOR OF,45 RSHATARAH 2x6 WD,STUD 416.O.C.W/2 IN THICK SOLID WD.BI-1(AT POSTS ENSURING TRANSFER OF LOADS TO FOUNDATION B OR LESS. [ONSULTB:GETGLNEFI2S.P.C. INTERMEDIATE WALL HEIGHT PER SHEAR WALL DETAIL). FOOTINGS. R-19 BATT.WSULATION&1R DRYWALL FINISH ON INTERIOR 2 ALL GLAZING AND ASSEMBLIES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION M09 6500 JEJ'DCHO TURNPIKE SIDE.PROVIDESMIN.PLYWD SHEATHING,TYVEK BUILDING E. DOUBLE WOOD JOIST UNDER ALL PARALLEL PARTITIONS A UNDER OF THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE OF NEW YORK STATE. SUITE IW WRAPBWALLFINISKSEEMATERIALSPO BATHTUBS-SEE GENERAL NOTES FOR ADOMONAL FRAMING PROW DE SAFETY GLAZING IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS(PARTIAL LIST, SYOSSET.NY 11791 REOUIREMENTS- SEECODEFORAODITIONALLOCATIONS); TEL'(516)731-4687 INTERIOR DOOR GLAZWG WITHIN BATHTUBS,STEAMROOMS,SHOWERS.AND 8. PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SHORING OF NEW WALLS 9 FLOORS OR ALL UNITS LESS THEN IB•A.F.F. FAX.(516)796-2744 BEFORE ENLARGEMENT OF EXISTING OPENINGS ANDIOR WALL RUDOIPMLIRSCE-PGCOY REMOVALS.DO NOT MOVE SHORING FURTHER FROM THE FLOOR L NEWWWDOWLOCATIONSSHALLBEFRAMEDW/JACKBKWGSTUDS RU DOLPH S.SHATARAH,PM �=INTERIORPOCKETOOOR REMOVAL THAN ACTUAL HEIGHT(DEPTH)OFTHE FLOORJOIST. ANDNEWHEADER AS INDICATED W LOCATIONS SHOWN ON M'WA'.RS<£- DRAWINGS ALL OTHER WINDOWS ARE CONSIDERED REPLACEMENT W SD/CM COMBINATION SMOKE&CARBON 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL FUR NISH&INSTALL 6/8'FIRE RATED GYPSUM WINDOWS,CUSTOM SIZED TO FIT WITHIN EXISTING OPENINGS. 0 MONOXIDE DETECTOR BOARD ON EACH SIDE OF 2 x B STUDS(U.L DESIGN P U30D)ATALL WBEAND CEIUE6RANJG HOUSE FROM REMAWMG INDICATESLOATIONOFPOSTLOADING LL WHERE PLICABL POS SBEFASTENEDTOGETHERWI)S'DW LAC BOLTS®z4•o.c. -+ I PROPOSED SWIMMING POOL WRLL HDSGGHR \ / CLADDE :, '- 106 1 TO MATCH RESIDENCE h BLIJE5TONE COUNTERTOP W/5 BURNER BMLT W PROPANE GAS GRDL 116'-7�" THESE PLANS NE AN WTRIIIQR OF SER) AM ARE THE PROPERIT OF M BONER NRNCDENT WLL BE PROI R LSA I'OJTLIN Of SELIp 72m] 23'-11" 21'-O" 36'-2" 16-3" Of THE�W'you���� 21 2FF 1X 1W 1V tU PROPOSE '""FOR PERSONA UNLESS TREY UPPER LEVEL MASTER ®CI( ARE/CRA HOER WISDOM OF A BEDROOM BALCONY V GA 2'-9" 4'-9" 4'-9" 4'-9" 6'-11" -10� 3-1D4" 4'-9" 4'-9" 3• 1 - o PROPOSED COMPOSITE 7-e' — — — UQ16ED PRO IN AN FAY. IF Y N3FA ANY DEM N AIR WAY, FAIN SPIRAL STAIR TO GRADE z WEE STAIR A NANUTAI. F (DDXMC FIR FNA) OASLED M—NAGTE9— IBM lt/BMA' ER M Ci AN DOWN m CRAM OF B,ALGDITT DECK ABO.t BAi®R B L*711, S LAND O D!4®R SHNL AETW MB SEAL NC A MOIRE Bf.E 0, Br &7 SONRIE SP WE ai SA21 atElwDll AIC A sro6x 06QZmmM ai TIE:A073WE 1 S1VL BE IBRD. I e i6'-�^ ��-1�^ 16'-1D" '-10' I 51-6" - [N 1 1L 1K 1J 11 �i 10'-4" lY I .�1� 3,_1�. 4'_9. 3,_7�. 1,-1�2_0^ In i••\. PRIVACY SCREEN WAIL 1S ' g'iR 4=7 a" 10 4�^ 1P 4'_�^ 1N 241 PROPOSED MASTER BALCONY SD/Ly I (�n -7�- "� PRIMACY SCREEN t<SHADE VAu 51.8'AZG s10N0 nt(EU-.21.7{1) PROPOSED 1G BD OXWU.xEWTfT OTHER 1 (191.7 SF.) MASTEIi�GEoau M �� Ea EKED TO ID Uk O 1201 I FAINLY�iT°Y OB M FASTF}dO TD f094L (WOOD FN.FIR) 11m I •� EGOD PAINO. -I N (8-:.21.05) (WOOD PK RR) p i0 IlF1 tV 21'-5" PROPOSED 1- (O G 1D ROOM 3'-S'WIDE DEC K STAIR Sc e (WOOD FIN RR.) 4 HANDRAR TO GRADE. m o N 6'-4" °n z PROPOSE 7// OOIE 00 ?,m Q 2,-9„2LL 3- `o El ❑ u w o 4'-O” I 1FN.FUA WOOD FRAMED STAR O U w Q4 56'-11 ) DO 4-5 1 1'- 4'-r KE TAA GATE W/SEF ¢o IJ :I ® "o B �(��a CLBSDIG HARDWARE W N o O 11' 10" Of''-5 I 6'-2" Spey ON P,OP0.5N LJ• V a m w O V N z 0 O o " PROPOSE (ELEVATOR) (WOE FlR RR) f p¢m>,_PROPOSED ¢ () i0 MSTR BATH 1 I �� LOSFT ° y Z W .I (TUE ) m I (WOOD R11 RR) (8.: 7195) FID19 LU maox 1,I) (pOOp FM FIR) cr¢O y FQ- O 10 (EL:M75) SD/�Y 12--0-1 �I O=0 UP I V °N 1F W Z Z z O o ppgp Z �� ti U 1 PROJECT: OEG z 2'-(1"2'-0" 1 '-9" 2'-0" 4'-0. -1" -10' C::1 OWOOC FN-FUR.) a 1C 1E REVISIONS 22'-6 1A in PROPOSE N DATE REVISIONS 3'-6" 9'-4" 4'-1" 9'-4" 4'-0" PoWD�E _ UP 7M8122EDPFRSURVEYO ElEYAlO1W_J�_ (TEF IFW1I-] FU) O7 ®BHT NOM REVISEDPERCOMMENTS FL.18,48' (WOOD FDL FUR) OPEN TO BELOW 1D >_ I- 5P x e AM S[IKG SD. AID(VflBEA(LH2IE. Y TOFASTENED 014R WITFFRPRROOFIC MEMBRANE PFUA WINDOWS DOORS NBYNUY (\p^J_/ 1gy��1�/'/p �1�L���'' aAa mUOR W14R v `T &=� D COMMENT ISSUE I 1 PROGRESS FRONT EIEYATCN ZREVISED PER COMMENT EL•111.38' AUG - 5 2022 PRO ECT No. 21-350-00 Southold Town DA 05-08.21 Board of Trustees DPAIVN BY: KJS , CHECKED BY:PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR CONSTRUCTION PLAN SCALE: AS SHOWN SCALE 11/4'=1'-0' NOTEFORCONTRACTOR: ,,,((( ALL TRADES ARE REQUIRED TD REVIEW,REFER TO AND BE FAM&IAR WITH THE ENTIRE DRAWING SET AND PROJECT MANUAL /\ PACKAGE PRIOR TOBEGINNING ANY WORKANY DISCREPANCIES DUE TOALACK OFCROSSTRADECOORDINATION MATHTHE //-j`J ENTIRE DOCUMENT SET WILL BE REPAIRED.REPLACED OR RZANSTALLED AT THAT CONTRACTORS SOLE EXPENSE • WALL AND DOOR LEGEND: SECOND FLOOR&ATTIC LEVEL PLAN NOTES: BATHROOM FINISH NOTES: 1, TYPICAL NEWSHEARWALLCORNER HOLDOWNSSMALL BEBY LIGHT&VENTILATION SCHEDULE NEW INTERIOR DRYWALL PARTITION W WD.STUDS SIMPSON STRONG-TIE NO.HDU4 WITH AN ALLOWANCE LOAD- 1. IN BATHROOMS USE 7/16'THK CEMENT BD.ON WALLS ADJACENT TO 16'O.C.W/12 SHEETROCK FINISH ON BOTH SIDES. 7,870 LBS f (OR EQUAL).SEE FLOOR PLANS FOR LOCATION OF SHOWERS AND TUBS fl 1?THK MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP.BD.ON SEE PLANS FOR VARIATION IN WALL THICKNESS. HOEDOWNS. REMAINDER OF WALLSflCLG. COMPLIANCE AS PER SECTION R303.1 OF THE BUILDING CODE OF N.Y.STATE j2232Z SHEAR WALL LOCATION 2 PR VIDE SHEAR WAL AT/OPENIGSUOUS OWITHIN 3'-0'OD HEADER rF WALL SEEOSS IPLANSfl NGS TO WINDOW NOTES: MIN.REQUIRED ACTUAL ( 1 1 WINDOWIDDOR SCHEDULES FOR HEADER SIZE 8 LOCATIONS. B-POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL 1. ALL GLAZING INSTALLED IN HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS DEFINW HABITABLE ROOMS ROOM AREA LIGHT(8%) VENT(4%) LIGHT VENT REMARKS BEE GENERALNOTESfl DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL 3. TYPICAL STEEL COLUMNS OF REQUIRED) BE AS SPECIFIED SECTIONR3013.4 MOB OF NY STATE BWG.CODE SHALL BEW COMPLIANCE Wf W GENERAL NOTES STEEL NOTES.VERIFVEXACTLOCA'RONfl sEcnoN R3DB GLA7INO. MASTER BEDROOM 331.8 SF 26.5 SF 13.3 SF 169.2 SF 56.4 SF CONFORMS INFORMATION HEIGHT OF COW MN IN THE FIELD.SEE FOUNDATION PLAN FOR ALL FOOTING SAES. 2. WINDOWS TO BE HIGH PERFORMANCE LOW�TYPE,NFRC CERTIFIED NEW INTERIOR DRYWALL PARTITION(ONE-HOUR FIRE WITH'U'FACTOR VALUE OF.35 OR LESS.SKYLIGHTS TO BE HIGH PROP.BEDROOM#1 154.2 SF 12.3 SF 6.2 SF 75.8 SF 15.8 SF CONFORMS RATED)24 WD.STUDS C IVD.C.W/2'SOUD WD. 4. PROVIDE FULL DEPTH SOLID WLOW{TYPE.BLOCKING UNDER ALL WOOD PERFORMANCE LOWTYPE.NFRC CERTIFIED WITH V FACTOR OF RSHATARAH BLKINGATINTERMEDIATE WALLHEIGHTSANOONE POSTS ENSURING TRANSFER OF LOADS TO FOUNDATION B A50RLESS LAYER OF 5/8 TYPE 0C SHEETROCK FINISH ON EA SIDE FOOTINGS. PROP.BEDROOM#2 230.4 SF 18.4 SF 9.2 SF 112.8SF 15.8 SF CONFORMS [ONSIILTWG ENGW'FFFR,P.C. 3. ALLGLCEINGANDASSEMBLIES SHALLCOMPLYWITHSECTIONRT08 6500.RTOCHO NITS IW NEW EXTERIOR WALL S. DOUBLERS.SEE GENERAST L NOTES FOR ADLTIONALONSflUNDER OF THE OVIDE SAFETY GT.BUILDING THE FOLLOWING INGYREAS(PAR ATINTESTUD EDIATE AD.C.W/2 IN THICK SOLID LLHEIGHT(APRSHEAD.OLKAL BATH REQUIRBB.SEEGENERALNOTESFORADDITIONALFRAMING PROVIOESAFETYGLAZINOLLOCAMLLOWINGAREAS(PARTIALLIST, PROP.GUEST 230.4 SF 16.4$F 9.2$F 163.2 SF 30.6 SF CONFORMS sYo516L31-468 AT WTE.R-19BTWALLHEIGHT(ASPERYWALL WALL REQUIREMENTS. SEECOOEFINGWITNBANALTHOUBS,ST); TEL ONINTERIOR IDEPROIADEWNfl PLYWDSALLFINISHTHING • GLAZING WRHW BATHTUBS,A.F.F.AMROOM9,5MOWERS,AG AX- (516)796-4687 TYVEK UWIN WPROVIOE3/CO ALLFI SHEATHING, 8. BEFORENI-ARSUFFICIENTSHOF EXITINEW OWALLSB FLOORSWALL ALL UNITS LESS THEN IB'AFF. MATERIAL SP NGWRAPfl STUCCO WALL FINISH.SEE BEFOVALS.D NOT E SHORING AND/OR WALL FAX 518 786-27H MATERIAL SPECS. REMOVAL 71HA NOT MOVE SXORWEPTH)O THE ORJOIS. 0. NEWWWHEADECAIS INDICATED IN LOCATIONS CATIO S JAOKN KING STUDS RUDGPHORST£-PC,COM REMOVAL 7HAN ACTUAL HEIGHT(DEPTH)OF THE FLOORJOIST. AND DRAWINGS ALL OTHER ARE CONSID REDSHOWNRE LA RUOaPH S.SHATARAH,P.E. DRAWINGS.ALL OTHER WINDOWS ARE CONSIDERED REPLACEMENT NWR.RSCE-PGCOY 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISHfl INSTALL 6R'FIRE RATED GYPSUM WINDOWS,CUSTOM SIZED TO FIT WITHIN EXISTING OPENINGS. INTERIOR DOOR BOARD ON EACH SIDE OF 2,B STUDS ILL-DESIGN#U309)AT ALL ILINPUETING MOUSE FROM REMAINING HOUSE WHERE WHEREAPASU INTERIOR POCKET DOOR /�a`� _ ?i i�I SDICM COMBINATION SMOKE 6 CARBON O MONOXIDE DETECTOR INDICATESLOCAITCH OF POST LOADING ABOVE ALLPOS Ora. ❑ LAG BOLTS BE FASTENED TOGETHER Wf�'010. LAG BOLTS�24'O.C. 6 21'-0" 1T-1}" 21'-D}" ls'-s^ 5'-6" V-c" IN=PMNS ARE w WIRMDU OF SA1'IDE fun NS TIE PROPERTY a 2Z 2X 2W 2V 2U 2S 2R 2Q 2P 20 23. 2K O TLE ■L BE -1PROSIODAEOL 01 3'-10q" 4'-9° 4'-9" 3'-101^ -10� -11" 4'-1a" 4-_g" 4'-11" 2'-1a" 2'-7" 4'-g" 3'-9° 4'-4j" 3', 2'-19' '-101 3'-10j" 4'-g^ 3-10�" 11'-10}2'-0" R B A VOLITION a SECIDN 72OU a FO IB.R YOR(STATE NI.Y)VIW W EGL NTT PER D lNOSS THEY ARE lED GODi 0F8'DIGN a A LC3® PDIN IN0KY Ey. F 10 AL7TA N7T DEI N NK INT. fm I. DIN a.mi V6n u Sa AK - DeB N.1FRD, llE KTP4N D CHEER SKNL NiA 16 SB1L Nn A NI0G11DN•ALTER➢Cf.f000ND E )8S SCLOGB ND WE a SCI 21-i AVIDLNIDi 00 A SFEOs10 IKSG✓pipl 1`N BALCONY a 11E N1DMInN 51NLL BE NOTED, •I I3 101.x¢IaBO'h (253.5 SF OH AaBWE in L eo -I 21 E-n9EDR io- 2 RBVACr SC_RDI t SHOE HOKI OPEN TO BELOW ® 2H ru'yy6E sODO (OM M RPL) m.TYR)¢.KLYVTr ODOR ROP05ED m TIP.)Icr,,.��lr PROPPOOISED LNRED�A1ti "r'�' FASTENED TO IVDA. I Po ) • ►Doo P6In. RKFLL(WOOD FIR RR.) f7K FIR) 4 AREA OF MASTER ° Yo BEDROOM. SEE A3-1 54/1 0 o vl FOR LAYOUT V RX1P ALccts so��rl 0 Z rD LADDER BOUNDED TO SCE VAIN ro �J SD�Mr.-a © ❑ ❑ U' 3 m J ACCESS�Oi XA1CN ABO E. ® Z'v 15'-7" ® 11 Q N o v d w w CL H N j IL ON •i '03° 4'-0^ - 7'-7j"-M1 4'-7j" - Zo o o -n -rn FIEVATOR W 2'x ��� �m z W dox-r 15'-7" 1T-01" 4'_0• 4'-1{75 12-1PROPOSED (L''of LL F N FOYER O150�M iv O=O CL ��) 3'-0" 14'-10" < 13'-Ci 9-�6^ VDN 2G 3 Z 3 O W'" PROPOSEDPRO OSLO -Z r'QON 1 U � I . OTODo FIR) PROJECT: NAME u 2'-0" 4'-0" _14' (Ntoo Fix FTA.) a 2A 2B 2D 2C o PROPOSED AFF "12 2F REVISIONS o WEIF( - #DATE REVISIONS 10'-9" 1O FIN.RA.) j� PR_p PROPOSED M I 728/Yt EDPERSURVEYO I V-0" 12t2 1 8/0222 REVISEDPERCOMOVENT8 � Ono➢Fx FIR.) r7fffff 2E PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR CONSTRUCTION PLAN 1 SCALE 1/4'=1'-O" cisTum m n7u YERlAM �irA(i K1EEis Y QUER 1WFRPROOFHO MF1BiANE PELA IONOGi 4 DOORS AUIINII CUA CaLR WIRE pp{yp/(J/ F''i��C E �:/ E v °� kTE ISCOMMENT 021 PROGRESS PRIM 1422 SED PER COMMENT SUE ,AUG - 5 2022 P JECT No. 21-350-00 Southold Town o E: 05-06-21 Board of Trustees 2FIkWN BY: KJS CHECKED BY: SCALE: AS SHOWN NOTE FOR CONTRACTOR: ALLTRADES AREREQUIREDTO REVIEW,REFERTOANDBEFMIIUARWITHTHEENRREDRA WSETA PRWEGTMMLUAL PACKAGE MDR TO BEGINNING ANYWORK ANY DISCREPANCIES DUE TOALACK OF CROSS IE COORDINATION WffHTHE -L ENTIREDDCUMENTSETWILLBEREPAIRED.REPLACEDORREWSTMLEDATTHATCOMMCTOR5SOLEpo SE ROOF LEGEND: AINLESS STL VIBRATION ISOLATOR TO STL STRUCTURAL COORDINATE FINAL ROOF EQUIPMENT ANGLE.BOLTED TO COND.UNIT.TYP. J.OF ENINGTOBESEALEDW/ PRE-ENGINE 1111-ADHEAREDSINGLEPLYEPDM STAND DIMS,MEMBER MAX.WT-55W E RESISTANT SILICONE ALLUMINUM ROOFTOP ROOFNG MEMBRANE SYSTEM OVER 0/4' SAES WITH UNRUK BEAM LANT FOAM EQUIPMENT STAND BUILDING CODE.MECHANICAL: ) , , PLYWOOD SHEATHING MANUFACTURER QUARE TUBING 1.Sx1.S 6061-T6 ALUM. UM COPPER COPING CAP,FLASHING SYSTEM.PROVIDEW BIRO SCREEN 6X WIND RESISTANCE. RESISTANT POLYMERIHDPE/CPVCR9UBBER SEPERATION ON FRIGERANT LINES FROM MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT•APPLIANCES AND SUPPORTS THAT ARE DISSIMILAR METALS,TYP,ALL SHEETS,TYP. GOOSENECK FOR CHASENDENSING UNITS WOOD OR MASONRY EXPO SED TO WIND SHALL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED TO RESIST VENTILATION PLINTHS W/CANT STR+P, THE WIND PRESSURES DETERMINED INACCORDANCE WTTHTHE KEYNOTE: t9Dxo.+4•aLUM.PosT OUBLE CRIPPLE WALL CURB W/2X4 STUDS®fY O.C.,CURB B'W. VERT,FLASHING,COPING BLINDING CODE,BUILDING. W/5'%SxTL'ALUM.BASE CLAD WISlB'PLYWD.,PROVIDE FULL HT.BLOCKING UNDER STAND EFRIGEPANT SUPPORT TOP,SEE STRUCTURAL O PERIMETER CM AND TAUNTER FLASHING PLATE(4 PER UNIT) FOOT LAG BOLTS,TYP. 20 GA SHEEP METAL DWGS,FOR ADDTITONAL E%CEPTION:EXPOSED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT OR APPLIANCES (4)r-LAGBOLTSPER POS WDIAM.LAG SCREWSX3'LONG®8'O.C.,TYP. IS ANCHORS,BRACING, FASTENED TO A ROOF W COMPLIANCE WITH CODE USING RATED O DOWNSPOUT LOCATION WITH NUT AND WASHER FASTENWG,TYPICAL STANDS,PLATFORMS,CURBS,SLABS,WALLS,OR OTHER MEANS ARE RSHATARAH NOTE DEEMED TO COMPLY WITH WIND RESISTANCE REQUIREMENTS OF 2020 CDNSULIB:GENGWTFAS.P.0 3O CRICKET SIMPSON LUS36 HANGER, 1, ALLFASTENERS EXPOSED TO WEATHER TO BE STAINLESS BUILDINGCODE,AS AMENDED.FURTHER SUPPORT OR ENCLOSURE OF 6500.FRICHO TURNPIKE EACH END,TYP. STEEL SUCH MECH.EQUIP.OR APPLIANCES IS NOT REQUIRED BY STATE OR 9117E IW O THRU FLASHING 2. PROVIDE W RESISTANT POLYMER/HDPEICPVCIRUBBER LOCAL OFFICIAL HAVING AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE BUILDING CODE. SYOSSET.NY 11791 SEPEPATION OF DISSIMILAR METALS,TYP. PROVIDE SEALANT UNDER WOOD TRUSS,COORDINA TEL:(576)731-1687 OS PERIMETER MTL ROOF DRIP EDGE TRUSS LOCATION WR}i CURB. 3. VERIFYGAUGERHILKNESS,SGEOFALLECUIPMENT K EACH CONNECTION,TYPICAL VIBRATION ISOUTON. FAX(516)796-2744 STAND COMPONENTS,MEMBERS W/MANUFACTURER WHERE VIBRATION ISOLATION OF EQUIPMENT 8 APPLIANCES IS RFAX HORSCE-PCCOM EPDM ROOFING MEMBRANE SYSTEM•MANUFACTUREDBY 4. MECH.EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MIN.+e'CLEAR OF FINAL FIN. EMPLOYED,AN APPROVED MEANS OF SUPPLEMENTAL RESTRAINT RUDOLPH S SHATARAH,P.EGEMFLEX'(0.08 THICK)ORAPPROVED EQUAL. WOOD TRUSS,COORDINA ROOF SURFACE GED DETAIL THIS SHALL BE USED TO ACCOMPLISH THE SUPPORTS RESTRAINT. WWW,RSLE-Pr ADHEARED WITH BOND OVERLAP SEAMS AS REQUIRED BY MANUR TRUSS LOCATION WITH CURB. 6 BLOCKING®8.O.C. SHEET NOTE:SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS.FOR ATTATCHMENT OF PLINTHS TO ROOF DECK TYP. O COPPIRFLASHING SHALL NOT EI IERS OBE CONTACT WITH BELOW PLINTH PERIMETER, EDGE ILIARMETALS.ALL FASTENERS TO BE COPPER CAPA NP. EDGE FLASHIGN TO BE 4'MIN PROVIDE STEP FLASHING WITH CAP B COUNTERAT CHIMNEYAND '�.�G•% O ROOF JUNCTIONS AND WHERE TYPICALLY REQUIRED. ROOFTOP EQUIP. CONNECTION 3 PIPING THRU ROOF DECK DETAIL 4 CU MOUNTING DETAIL O PERIMETERCOPPERAPRONFLASHWG SCALE N.T.S. SCALE N.T.S. SCALE N.T.S. IIS4 PWC NS AN MSTMREIR OF SEIMCE AND AIS IIF PROPERTY of RAI Of BALCONY B[EKIM NRBCOW WILL BE RAI BELOW I+OSIMArtm T 5 A YKIATI N OF SDMi 72OU OF TIF MIN YORX SDUE DAMON UW FOR NW POWK U DUS WEY ARE AGUE OIDLP DIWTDN OF A UCTRED PRN.SSDNV- OCIMM 10 NM W Bill N JAN WAY. F ANY 0.D. M ffNIC M STN Di Ni BGRELR B NTDIEQ LIE NTmw DOM SH LL NFD(16 SFA AM A WTNDN INTEND Of,FWDND BY I6 SCOME AND DOE OF SUCH NIEPCON AND A SPFCNC OESCi81gi a THE AUDWIDN SHALL BE NNM 1• O.D. \, ORD. ��, CHIYTffY MECJWOGL EQUIPMENT SEE CWMNEY DETAIL SHT.XX SEE CHIMNEY DETAIL SHT.X% SCREEN WNL ROOF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT W/ROOF WHALE ROOF ACCESS LADDER MOUNTED TO EXTERIOR WALL N ¢O Oj 3m Z ROOF HATCH ACCESSED z�' J WADE CLOSET O LLO U w IL H ROOF DRAINS PIPED TO LLA y o DOWNSPOUTS BEHIND RAN O n F O SCREEN PIPED TO PROPOSED STORM DRA"I S15TEY.7YP. Z O O❑ RD. O W Z F Q m M� W w I=o=o � F2:z O z wmoon Z� PROJECT: DRAWING z NAME REVISIONS #DATE REVISIONS FR \�(J ISSUE ll°I°I iii��� ATE COMMENT 10/11 PROGRESS PRINT 1 4r2 VISEDPERCOMMENT AUG - 5 2022 P JECT ND. 21-350-00 Southold Town D E: osoa-21 1 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN Board of Trustees WN BY. KJS CHECKED BY: SCALE 4'=1'- SCALE: AS SHOWN NOTE FOR 10- - ES DNTMCTOR:ALLTRADES ARE REOUIRED TO RENEW.REFER TO AND BE FAMILIAR WITH THE ENTIRE DRAWING SET AND PROJECT—`L PACKAGE PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK ANY DISCREPANCIES DUE TO A LACK OF CROSS-TRADE COORDINATION WITH THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT SET WILL BE REPAIRED.REPLACED OR—hISTALLEO ATTNAT CONTRACTORS SOLE EXPENSE. • WALL AND DOOR LEGEND: NEW INTERIOR DRYWALL PARTITION 2x4 M.STUDS @ 16.D.C.W/12 SHEETROCK FINISH ON BOTH SIDES. B' " SEE PLANS FOR VARIATION IN WALL THICKNESS. 15 14 13 g2gWZ SHEAR WALL LOCATION NEWS-POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL SEE GENERAL ' '•'�"' NOTES 6 DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 6'-0" 3- " _ NEW INTERIOR DRYWALL PARTITION(ONE-HOUR FIRE WITS F DOT.W.255 RT' RATED)2X0 WD,STUDS®16'44 W/T SOLID ND, CFA TREATED TTP.MILK BAKING INTERMEDIATE WALL HEIGHTS AND ONE LAYER OF SB TYPE'X'SHEETROCK FINISH ON EA SIDE N L 10'tlA TRNDI RSHATARAH NEW E.STUOR WALL LRE A OPEN M GE80 I I—ANE Of ROOF AWE CTNSULTINGERGL\IFAS.P.C. 2X6 WD.STUD WALL O.C.GHT(ATHICK SOLID WD,BLEAT DECf ABM 6500 JEAICNO TURNPIKE INTERMEDIATE WALL HEIGHT IAS PER SHEAR WALL DETAIL). F%6111C� II PROPOSEDPROVIDE NEW 36 M. SUITE 1W R-10 BATT.INSULATON 812 DRYWALL FlNISH ON IMERIOR UN06TIIRBED FRADE SIDE PROVIDE 3/d W.PLYWD SHEATHING.TYVEK BUILDING OPEN MR GAZEBO I ACCO HAN E WT H SYO516) NY 11791 4687 WRAPB WALL FINISH.SEE MATERIAL SPECS, PROPOSED ST IIP� I GAZEBO STOP" � e ® ACCORDANCE WITH ORCNYS TE:(516)771-4687 1 8311.78 @ R7p13. ) INTERIOR DOOR THE DuSlING NATURAL ED MADE (114®)I _I 'p (BIDDING i1fl66J�) I RUDOPHOR�Cfg PC�COY (PROP.127A SF.) RIlOO PH S.SHATARAH,P.E. INTERIOR POCKET DOOR UP BR]VOE D EE SFDIGN UP PRDf6SED WYPOSRE WWWRSCE-PC.COY SD/CM COMBINATION SMOKE 6 CARBON UNE OF PE OFLIDlG TDfOR TBD. _ O MONOXIDE DETECTOR UNE IED�° Z POS SSLOGTON IENEDT LOADINOABOVE ALL POSTS SHALL BE FASTENED TOGETHER W/V D W - —V TVI JO' ��/' �;^ `& 4• LAO BOLTS 1gf 24'D.G. I —� ,I �% -- -- ' '• , I... _ .c� 1X6 SCFE EN GA PMR T1b I ON E1WMSTORAGE. \ `•, `� E SIL J 5•_D- PROFOSFD COINOSITE N TO WLR[ SWR t UWDISIIU DDEx fi NATURAL IDm6110✓ffD GRADE HESE RAItti ARE AN NGIR11W OF SERINE M AIG NE TIE PROPEDY OF �®L ff P IT M NER m"SSBCRDW 7am 2W w IM MN FORK UUM MT —OF RAM ARE ICING LAGER DREDDDN OF A CAMILK ARM UCDW PRORS901PL DCMM W ALTER ANT DEN N AW EAI'. E ANF OEII ffING M SGV. a' M 1H4IS1BUO PROPOSED RA®CATIMLK DG11E}R G AUDED,M M1DiN0 [W1EDt 9R1L AiFY IFS SEAR AIG A 12 RAU(V,Y SR"Ail AID roar D3W EPoY ROOFlNC MEMBRANE I I OF�MEAllEPAAND�SHAD.BE DISDWWN SYSTEM 2XB TREATED CEILING J06TS O 16'O.C. PROP.T.O.GAZEBO _ EL +9'-7°(+26.33) o 1X10 A7EK FASCIA BOARD I M PRE CAR GIRDERS(2)3X12 TREATED I o TD18ER5 THUR BOLTED TO TOP OF NOTCHED PBL.(2)r GALVANIZED BOLTS&HARDWARE(1YP.) PROPOSED OPEN AIR GAZEBO 112La o (DECKING RN.FUR.) °J I I I ¢o Q 'J 3m x 6'COINOSITE DECKING. I I Z COLOR:T.B.D.P ED RAISED 10 11 12 I TWALK 1 I (EEL 16.6.68) 2XB TREATED DECK JOISTSO 16'O.C. PRw17— _ OP.FlRST FLOOR 6'_0j" 6•-2{5" I6'_2�" VW Q_a"vii O EL +0'-0'(+16.75) .. =a 1x10 Azo FASCIA BOARD — — — — — I —( p w z 5, W POE GP pRDETiS(2)3X12 1RFATED lO®ERR THUR BOLTED TO 70P OF W m< NORHED POE(2)�'CN.VARQED 11� .I I I y� ¢¢Our O BOLTS&HARDWARE(IVP.) & Z F Z i 0 LLJ 3x8 DIAGONAL BRACES TO BE TNRU Z m N C)U BOLTED TO PILES W/r HOT DIPPED CALV.BUf1E!MEAD DOLTS(IVP. PROJECT: DRAWING NAME 12 PROPOSED OPEN AIR GAZEBO FOUNDATION r„1PROPOSED OPEN AIR GAZEBO DECK LEVEL REVISIONS FOUNDATION PILES-12'BNTS X ' SCALE 1/4'=1'-43" SCALE 1/4'=1'-0" #DATE1 REVISIONS 3OFT.SVP.2.5 PCF CG TREATED TVP. U.O.N. 7=2EVISEDPERSURVEYOF 8/0222 REVISEDPERCOM.¢NIS IX.GRADE EIEV. UNDISTURBED DL ' GRADE PROFILE L-+&D' E EEK EX GRADE ETV. L UND6NRBED EX EL-4SAY 77 GRADE PROR IX.GRADE ELEV. ISSUE l�J n NG pN0%I((nle /f COMMENT EL-43.0' E A 1{77�� L A�T D �H7(/ 1 PROGRESS PRINT i'- Ilid EVISED PER COMMF ;�UG 5 2022 PROJ CT No. 21-150-00 DATE: 05-08-21 RA PROPOSED OPEN Southold G) Town DBY: KJS S AIR GAZEBO SECTION Board of Trustees cHEc Dev: SCALE 1/2°=1'-O° AS SHOWN NOTE FOR CONTRACTOR: ,I ALLTRADES ARE REQUIRED TO REVIEW.REFER TOAND BE FAMILIMR WITH THE ENTIRE DMWING SET AND PROJECT PACKAGE PILORTO BEGINNING ANYWORK ARI'DISCREPANCIES DUE TO A LACK OF CR-TRADE COORDINATION WRHTHE f/ply ENTRE DOCUMENT SETWRL BE REPMREO.M-EDMR VAU.ED ATTHAT CONTRACTOR'S SOLE EXPEKSE. y .CAM SINC B0.MDRR)1EOXk8GLLr SCREEN TALL FOR FAS7EIED 0 A7EK YFRTIGL FIA6Et5 2P O.C. ) CONTINUOUS ROOF TOP couPMER OVER TATEraImaFLND MOISRNE / / 1 IN m" — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — sD7 YEHI RSHATARAH CONSULTENG LNGLN=PC SCREEN IIIAU.FOR y'.HY Ami SdNG®.(N0R¢)HELIANCIILY .. — — — 6500 JERICHO TURNPIKE TOP Ed�1¢M FASTENED TO AZIOK OVER WATERPROOFING�µE 2{• SYOSSET,NY 11791 SUITE 1W TEL. (516)731-4687 '' FAX:(516)796-2744 RUDDPHORSCE-PC.CW L� ( y�SRy) RUDOLPH S SHATARAH,RE OYFA WDOO FRAIE WIbl15CTMR Sfd AEwOC�F0041 ma-GVDR w"'m 7 ® ® wNW.RSCE-PC.COY PRIVILY SI'REM t SHADE WALL BEYOND. / _IE (T}J — — — — — dal w •— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I'• L: ,L.• : IM i lei P- THESE wv5 ARE AN F6TRUI I OF SERYCE AND ARE THE PROP11"IF TIE DOM OWNING 00 WILL BE RECESSED HID LAMING GR.A9E' ( ♦ PREISOXTm . .. fL+la.fiB' O 5 A VIOLATION OF SECT N 71092 OF THE Nm YORK SLOE EO CAM W EEA AM PdSOHE HRAE4 THEY - - - - ARE FCIFC IOFR DPFLTDN OF A STO THOW-WIIN 9CPEL1(EE SISTEMI F�DP UREPL UI21®PROFL41gY1 DOM 70 OVER W000 TRINE COISIUCTNI.STO ALMR ANY ITEM N ANY W. FW ABMT FN6N EDIT-COLOR WE '' ORAE FWr9M 6 ALIDRp, THE ALTERING IEM IiYAKi THE SFIi 0' AN NOTATION'AMD Of.FIIORD IT EL+11.0 --....A HIS 901YOURE AM WE OF 90 GRADE FJ:+1{.1' ����•4 CDNPUANT �, .. OF THEN ANDTER SPEGALL BE NDTM 16@•FTD00 IS EU-+11,W .' d -m ylgpO THE NIER1110N SHALL ff HOIro. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — WING'a1AE STAR ACRYLIC FRANIE COAT - LO .5787 taFNsr�1CTrHL �yNt � o 'AnMFc FITAOI EDIT-COLOR WNIE•� 1 . — — — — — — — — — — — —— — — — — — — — — — EQ. i E0. RECESSED UP 1XRIIEIC — OS9[D UNE NC.GTFs FIEVAIdR GRADUATING dIESIOHE— RECESSED— —iDN CNHUIR IIOOfRI NL{OOIY FILWE —FF]N COWllM SFNi SSfEL FED11(RADE OF CIDGE OF PA4EMFM. ENTRY STEP STORM. IP LIGHTING 1GW FLOOD VCNIS WHCVEROPAQUE 9kD GARAGE DOOR. 1a1a•RDOD mas 10 REAR SY TEU F DECK AND FOOL(REM YARD) PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION PRNACY SCREEN SHADE 1w1 SEW 0 Y y ¢o OY m we Z z v1 Q r ag > W — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — W w W 5j'.r AZEK swRT�.( .) vFNr V<m w W HEdAHLKAL RAS24V O ro M w O O p YFROGIL WAIRS 24.O.C.Nfli z¢ 2 WATERPROOFING MOIBPAN: Q Y 2 Q Q y z 7 W U) S O W¢ N LSTOTHERW-PMyI$TEyI PRNAIX SCREEN 1 sHAOE H1L yte• cc¢JO LL~ 4 2F ?G ACRYLIC wO FRw mKI- Na S 8 O Td irP)AZEX SIDING NrN�LY F s TO z I=-z z IS ACRNO FDNmt t09-COLDR WHEfE—A 10bM.WOOD PWG W 0 0 0 (� / zW000 2 PROJECT: DRAWING ua•`F Nn"1' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REVISIONS T4 T5 ® d rO1�Dx MFTE ALUIONw N D2ATTEE REVISIONS REVISED 91OW2 REV6EDPFR WhOVENTS - - - - - - - - -- -- - - RAILINGS ro BE SOIIUISS SIL POST 1 S AND TOPRILL W/GALYANZED STL 1E 1F HTM.CAaNG. T.D.W. CL•+18.25' - - - - - - l➢ ISSUE GRADEIDAIA I COMMENT FL 11116' T,O,w,_ _ 1K8 SCR@N PNm ro N10 PROGRESS PRINT EL t14.1'. ENCLOSE FOOL DOUG'". 1Y7REVISFD PER COMMENT A U G - 5 2022 — — — — — � EEu�� — — — I'�— , — — — — — — — Southold Town PROJ TNo. 27.950-00 ENDO SHP SYSTEM 165R•ROOD VENTS I I I I I 'pG" Board of Trustees DATE: 05-08-21 BY: KJS CHECKED BY: 2 PROPOSED RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: ASSHOWN SCALE 1/4°_1'-0° RmEPORCORTRAOTOR: �—O PACMGEESARE RE—INNTO REVIEW.REFER TOANOBE Ct.S DU WITH TMEENTIREOSS-TRA BETANDPROJECT MANUAL PACHtAGE PRIOR TO DEGLVNINO ALLY WORK ANY DIaCREPANCIE6OUE TO A LACK OF CROSS-TRADE COORDINATION WRN THE ENTIRE DOCUMEM GET WILL BE flEPAIREO.REPLACED Oft REINSTALLED ATTHAT CONTMCTOR5 GORE EXPENSE, ) 1 1 1 RSHATARAH WNSULT IMG ENGN'FPRS.P.G 6500 JERICHO TURNPIKE SUITE TW SYOSSET.NY 11791 TE (516)731-4607 FAX:(516)796-2744 RUDOIPHORSCE-PCCOM RUDOLPH S SHATARAH,RE WWW.RSCE-PCCOM Mc4 xEV.1 THESE PWS AH AN I61mm OF SFRA[E AND NE M P1!(PEW OF THE DENIM IFRING ENE KIL BE PWS(aDFD D 6 A YOLAIDN E4 SECIDII 77092 OF THE IEW YM SINE EIUWION W EOR NEE PMA MISS THEY IRE ACRD UNDER DFJrM OF A LICENSED PRWISSOWL DI2FD1 7D ALTER ANF ITEM H ANY MY. F ANY DEET BEAM THE SEAL 6 AN DASIDT 6 km=THE ALTEIRIG DICKER SHAM AIM H6 SEAL AND A NOLIRON ALEDED BT'.FWOIED BE NS SE NCU E AM DVE OF SLOT N.TFRRON AND A SPE F C OE9IRIR! OF THE NIFR.VDN SAL BE NO0. SFO THERM-RNN SCREEN(OF SYSTEM) OVER WOOD FR CD CONSTRUCTION.SHE ACRYLIC FINISHFCOAT-COLOR WHITEIE U PROP.FIAT ROOF EL•+21'-2-(+37.83) 51•.c A2IX sEDEc BD.(HOPI¢) - - - - - - MECHANICALLY FASTENED To AZEK VERTICIL HAILERS 24.O.C.OVER \ WATERPROOFING MEIABRANE PRIVACY SCREEN h SHADE WALL ---�� 5)•X6•AID( SENO IED.CA LY FASTENED T OIHER B0.TYP.) ' MECHANICALLY FASTENED TO 1DbA WOOD PROP.SECOND FLOOR ,1, RUNG. EL•+11'-D'(+27.75) - - - - - - - - — PEUA W HDCAV 6 DOORS ALUWNUM Z CLAD.COLOR:WHITE PROP.MASTEtt FLOOR T.owRAILDIGS To BE BaNLE6s rn Pasr AND EL:+5'-4'(+22.08) — — — — — , TOPRAIL W/GALVANIZED SE.HORCZ CABLING. ~Q . r > EL•+18.25' 0 W PROP.FlRSr FLOOR 1X6 SCREEN PAx¢TO TIE UNE ALONG APPROXIMATE EL+O'-0'(+16.75) — — — — - ENCLOSE CAZEEE sTDRADE HIGH WATER MARK AS LOCATED ¢o lLl [APPROX.LOCAIEN OF GRADEIXPR ROAD. EL-+11.36 b.W UN06NReED IX CHADE PROFDE .+14 E7C GRADE ELEV. w e �_ LL� N PROP. GARAGE LEVEL GRADUATING BLUE570N ENRYSTEPEL-9'-0'(+7.38) SYSTEM. E I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r o = W u, FEW COYPUANT EX.GRADE ELEV. IX GRALEV DE EEEV. EX.CRADE EIEV. EX GRADE EIEV. IX.CRAVE E . 16•x8'FLOOD VDETS ¢-+8.0 ¢-+9.0' ¢_+9.D ¢-+8.0' ¢-+7.0 (.) Z O O Q EK GRADE F1EV. Q-T 2 aQ Q ¢-+ao Nz,m W WSON°aa S0=0> PROPOSED RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 3 D Z m SCALE 11W=1'-O• Z�m 1-0 I PROJECT: DRAWING AME REVISIONS #DATE REVISIONS /2872EVISED PER SURVEYOR BIOTR2 PEIM1SEDPER C/JAR.IENTS 2 \`p! I{�- ISSUE 11viT TIL`—E 1tT7il IIr�— AT COMMENT 102 PROGRESS PRINT 114/2 vis PERCOMMENr A U G - 5 2022 PROJE T No. 21-350-00 Southold Town DATE: 05-08-21 Board of Trustees DRAW BY: Kis D BY: SCALE: AS SHOWN NOTE FOR CONRM BEG A �—O/ ALLTRADESAREREOUI—TO RENEW.REFERTOANOBEFAMBIARWRHTHEENTIREDM NGSETANDMWECTMNIUAL PACKAGED UMETOBE MMB ANYWORK.ANYDISCREPANCIESDUETDATACKOFCROSS M'S COOROIN SE WTITIaE ENTRE DOCUMEM GET WILL BE REPN0.ED.REPLACED OR RHNSTALLEO-07744-07 CONIRAGTOR'S SONE EXPENSE CRIAgroup STO MRN-RAIN SMIN(E0 .. ST'SIEIQ OVER wLOo FRANCE ' mrmRuerinN. Sm ADRtUC . FNmi COQ-CONDR WMIE SORB VDIT.. -mm" COPOC - - - - - R SHATARAH CDNSM MG ENGMEENS.PC. 6500"CHO TURNPIKE 'SCREEN Epi RODE SUITE 1W M.(516 T,NY 4687 11791 7EL•(516)731-1687 FAX(516)796-2744 2D 511' urx FWB"mWRUDOfPHORSCE-PGCOM RUDOLPH S.SHATARAH,RE PRIM SCREW R SHADE t5Y151U' VOKIM WA7 NARERS OFING 2N 24'O.C.E OVER NWW.RSCE-PC.COM AII]!SEDC PLL(NORIZ.%EVERT ORER BA iYPJ YECHYOOWLT rASFTNEO To / - IDTW 11000 P11HL /l<fA' -�' RAANGS TO BE STAINLESS SR POST AND TDPRAA W/GALVANIZED SRNom CAXm— d PDU WFIOM'M DOORS.IEAIeAW aAo.caax WWE 1Y T.O.W. THU PWS ARE AN PISTM19R OF .. EL♦1825' SEAMS AND NEM PMNRIY OF . M EIIIWEDI.BERRIE"REEL BE PF�IIFR . .. 0 5 A MOUTON OF SI:RN 7108] — — —— DFM TRW PCkORX SINE ESS DEN THEY W FON ANY PERI CEM THEY • NE/CIBC PROFESSORIAL OGDLTW 7 A ATEA ANY NNMF!WAY, i ANY ('RADE. Rod DURING M SELL Q AN OpApE DcamnOM I L AFTED,M FTER HIS L AND A E:+11.0 Fl:1111.06' WMIpN IETIM Ur FCUM D BT .�o�IS [EDESI DORY PORM,b W/CRANIAING NS SWWNIRE AIT WE OF 41L11 USE 71 BIJUIESEDNE Tree'EEFP PF1dIEIEN I 1 IDuA.DDD I I I I I I I 1 fO1" SET ON POURED fEliO�'D WI ,E ON OF THE NO A NSNAII K NWMMN ?M WFD A SPECIFIC SIWL EE WIDE 1!'d'FIOOD Vd15 I I DOSTEP MIDI. COMPACTED -� I I m"G° FODaG I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GRA E PROPOM DMNEWAr EL•1]J6' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 21.11 111 PROPOSED LEFT SIDE ELEVATION SCALE 1/4'-1'-O' RNLNFS TO BE STAMM SIL POST FOR o AND TOflYA W/GALVANIZED SIs<REEN rul SIL SCREEN TDP ll RHT N. MFR.CABLING. 0 Y y Q o St•.G AII1!sIDN0 W.(10447.)WEDPMCNLY °•Yj N FASTENED m AgN VTROCAL NAAFRS 21.O.0 3 m —OVSR wTOWRWNC IRNBIWNE W a Z SMO 111ME D .COfD� �NUMEAN PWALY SCREEN d SNAIE WNL 5)•d• W 0 AZIX SSMG BD(HDRM)MAW OTHER Q BD TTP.)YECIWMNLY DslFtiD m SURD!WNL FOR lOTNA WOOD F o ROOF TDP EWPYEmw-NT J Uomo� W Zo�oo 2J 2K 2L O O ® 2R O yU O ® O O ® ® ® ® p w i F adox Ll m �� W ki) OWC w o a Ha- O C=OT D z z z a.lt ., — ® EEI ® ® ® O------ W moon Z�NH-U (� PROJECT: DRAWING G REVISIONS N DATE REVISIONS 11 1J 1K 1L 1N 1N 10 1P 10 1R 1T tU 1V 1W 1% , S10 THERM-RAN SCREDI(EF SST% ' CM WOOD FRANCE tSraMuclDH STD ALrifLC FW6T1 CMT-COLOR WME GRADE j- - - - - _ - - - - �2— ISSUE AND ToRwma.W/ RAMICS m EE STAMM M iY°2'DEEP P�FItIE/R t FLOOD VDOS �� L� � � V �TEO HEENT GAYA®SA1 1 1 1 CORI,GRAM FOOPNG 1 1 1 1 1 1 �10 wD I I 021 P ESS PRINT f1M VIS ER COMMEM TM W00 PEWS �— — — — 4-4-- ' '— — — — — 1 —w I — — 1I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I AUG 11-15 2022 PRO CT No. 21350-00 DAT 05-08-21 Southold Town DRAWN BY: KJS PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION Board of Trustees CHECKED BY: 2 SCALE 1/4'=-V-O' S IS SHOWN NOTE FOR CONTRACTOR: JA ,1 ALI TRAOESARENEOUIRED TOREVIM.REFMTOMDBEFAMNJARWR EENRREDR NOSETANDPROJECTMANUAI /I PACNAOEPRIORTOBEGINNINO-ORK.-ISCREPANCIES DUE TOALACK OF Ci105STRA0EC00RDItuRON VGTH THE -/�I' ENTIREDOCUMENTSETN BEREPARED.REPLACEDORREINSTALLEDATTHATCONTRACTORSSOLEEXPENSE •�'��•'l�.�' /�"yam.,'`.p",....>....�-- './..,.r. �.¢•-�•^^- Y -� ? .�� . � ��ii `-te=a►-� � , - • ,V rr ' R :. Mew' -• 1 .y. . y •t 1 I.' Y . 4^_.""'• r• � r..� 1. T �+, .2J����� ♦ a'i„� '.�-. 'mow:-i+.}.`• � �« �it� i` •� ..-•.lir` r f 5 r�11 . e _ j� Art , .N p 1. 7 { - :..---._...-.�+.Y.,'�dr � �.. .. �"y�"L - . .. a•�ti i_ �, � -r s ` �. Fes` - - y ����.++� • _.� - k-".' - + * "' r ti Rte•v • — for, }. � • r a,j�' , r..- r �.. tit,"� -' � .�. ir... t '`a,�. r� .� . `�r"t 1 j(',� �x -i _, r�r• n: 'h .�f��, r .�1. • -` rj. l . .:.'C i ,;Mr t rrj�•- �r �- r ►� :.ti - .r S r, �'�+rt F. +•x _ 'ii. -� _ rs"` w' �'j .r Mme.h r �' ��. •. 1a- jy,� �ih,s .9- r'pry: .••,., .�,/. . `w�.1 �� .;.. !. �'. i i'�y�• , ��..� ti; t I,'l..1+ *'',t 'y#,,.�.i� !r' C ,.,..1. •�" a, yl -ice•_" Y S I ` r r*, • -VIC• .y- . •� ,ri rei."r �-•"'mow.' ..- � ,� - .-+'"_ „ 7r^}' �`._ � ��J Jj � '^~� •7."'•� -.�. � r .y .•r .. r .'� +-;+� _� �' _ - � .. � Sze cif K" 1 ewe A. �•„�. +{� �/- �. v-' , „�, ; i- •. y l '"`.�.�.• !�' _ " .. '�:� ,- •yam,. ±; .� r� "k Ilk 41 ir •� f� ,fir '. ',�� � 4.,nM.+w:.r•�--�--K',, - - - �+�+�-'�'�"'e"H .w,.3 ".. -..,: � •,.r-.'.-...�.--ate ,•a— ---•.+.«L - � � _ � , ,.,0,14 .. ,�. � _•:' . .. .: w` _ •ter•y-..�....,�-" .,,^., �. v- - - _' 'els . - �' 1•. - r l r ,-"' - �♦ _ .fes T �._ s 1 ,. .. 1 _ �. ��. _ _{•fie. �% �.., —wow J 'µ. _ •.�+ . int-_ v e � -�./_,• T r'�f4 -14 TAbf V. 7�—."^� .• ,�*!* f: ,._ _ ; - -,.," � > .. � - ,+ — *. , 'rte t _ �. .,y''.A�•._ .fyj,,d�...f 1 �+�` ..a .. � "' �` � 'Y ..t�rrw ,.1. ♦ -- � �. r --. a- r-'- - - � r �'� g.� Y. _" • nom• N '�•y_�+ � _ ..'�.y.r r�` }. a - y:a 17 '414 �F fC \ ,t• .• w �•�, yM�• "moi' s v • f(� - .�„�t • ,�_, � t � 'r. r• �i •,1..• ` .,k•. :.y k syr' '�, �r1 1 f. Yr. ,• �� ,+'�. � _ � � � •.�, r'_�, � r �� yam,.. .+�; i { . r-- y tea• �Wr_ ! NgpEE2pDw.pS0 r- .,,,�Za arcs:$I �•, v ts, r „'I1 ••,:;:a s f'% � ! 3 '$"xs D, J- 2 r.,,. +• >;2,i+a• Y, :z :} � st 4 ..rye > `° qo w Ma asy°J Q �g,�� r,+�"_�° �y r � ,n r%� '"". ♦ ° aha r 1L1L tk �2 �t] 2♦pCy..... � �0�2 y � �r�&:� � 4`� IS.ONeI ,�, �/ �� wit%�� ,� ,� ` s�•e � ,;; any.4 /� J. � Jr t �•Rr e w 12 di .r Z". Yf '•'� - . Y tyr°""' J�>`a b f f a �„ A A rhe r� 4p,, -•,, a♦a r. �� b�!d� .a. �� i.: .�J .0 �'��r �. .,�o ��x". ` r "'Yq ,�1 ra r ♦�t SMd �. moi. f .. :t'..n � '. 4 rf.� r� � Z`1 � ,D� +r he / �' •i.�\ a .. � o s 's +ah r.4a�2J .... ,♦ :'`� �! Vii.. �"/ �a,gyp �?•,!`y'�'J� ..i GQ. , �,,v/ � ,+ 'a.��.�+'.� a' �"^ �,A g 212 '.,, a♦J ...?�. --- n � a R•'� vk JAY .�< �" ,t �i 4 P� r�n� © ',r .'t ��..�` `� tt r ��dl R'�Ja a�; e� '. � 4�J d{J/�ia •.M a�� J� R' �f� >., ,..i t al "a` S,' `'\ R>/ � .9, z1.r `•1e.�.4 ♦h '.� L" 'y a A ; - .•.�• '� s' S $ ,t � `>, as .1r b.,� ��..,�'v � t' � R. � sourlwln ��'�.•'.r, � ,.. rFp r -- � � u ry R� a��• �.... � �. ^�� J �_ ...tet.''9by �� ze �'.% csvrlo.cpnapxw �\� as I --_ h w��. .p'. at 'p,./�Sr p+� a � 'Qyp � � zz.2n '•,a 4c a4 •., " S' r .'a +' -{ f•' Y�J.tea . ..,: � 4 0 n, N A•' R.1t 4 4�i�5, y a�' SOuiHoio 1t�o .ly N + F Sy N � .w e,&f !'+ p ♦ `J ;>�ah n � � �y�. feo�lto�\ J� .r f+` � .� e `�ja-' a '', iti ,q,JrJ 61 :3 r��e > � w'>' .a' ra s ♦I ns J • Y `� t J�. 2' F &wo of n' ;1 d ', r2aa° V 4f \a?'Y� ,e ' 23 ....._ z a i s' b'�' a 2dJ y p,♦pif �'4.A. r '.,,ta y.� �,�..a���tb S� � n >a. pnr �' 'p' � 'a � ..„��. �`...3s zrg: •:.� �n _ � Q9 ��a7 v .�r�.�,r't„�a� � 3, t� >;-s � ANT a y +me .., ...� t...�._. -- — N CE E SC” E V COUNTY OF SUFFOLK z D 11D Real Prop I c \g y rw�ewrte..ra ron sue oP r e�r,��2 o.� rrry _ •�°�•• •' m v e u •MIIe1V'WWnBr I9iASW fYTE p +"•�r. —_ �.._... v -.•tui $ PFK IWfR1r iM 49tnCE.GBLv. ��-- �NVLY ur 4� 19�FQj John G.Stein,Chairperson Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Lauren Standish,Secretary P.O.Box 1179 i Southold,NY 11971 Telephone(631)765-1889 Fax(631)765-1823 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., August 10, 2022 the following recommendation was made: Moved by Carol Brown, seconded by Shannon Wright, it was RESOLVED to NOT SUPPORT the application of MKS REALTY, LLC to construct a new two-story frame house and garage (2,445 sf. footprint), raised deck (1,474 sf.), in-ground pool (522 sf.), gazebo with storage below (100 sf.) front entry stairs (663 sf.), stone blend driveway (4,095 sf.), public water service connection, new sanitary system, ie. one (1) 500 gallon wastewater treatment unit and six (6) 8.51 by 2' effect. depth sanitary leaching galleys (IAOWTS), and new stormwater control structures for roof run-off and driveway run-off. Located: 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold. SCTM#54-4-20 Inspected by: John Stein, Caroline Burghardt, Carol Brown, John Chandler, Maggie Merrill, Shannon Wright The CAC does Not Support the application. The proposed setbacks are too close to the wetland boundary, within the primary and secondary dune, and within a flood zone. This is an environmentally sensitive area and any development of this property would deplete the natural habitat. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried YOUNG &YOUNG Telephone (631) 727-2303 400 Ostrander Avenue Facsimile (631) 727-0144 Riverhead, New York 11901 admin@youngengineering.com HOWARD W. YOUNG,Land Surveyor THOMAS C.WOLPERT, Professional Engineer DOUGLAS ADAMS Professional Engineer/Geologist ROBERT STROMSKI,Architect August 4, 2022 Attn: Ms. Elizabeth Cantrell Town of Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: Single Family Residence MKS REALTY, LLC 1925 North Sea Drive at Southold, T/0 Southold, NY AUG - 5 2022 (20-00153) SCTM No.: 1000-54-04-20 Southold Town Board of Trustees Dear Ms. Cantrell: Enclosed is one (1) full size set and three (3) reduced copies of the CMA Group Architectural Drawings A1-0 through A4-1 (10 sheets) last dated August 2, 2022, for your use. Very truly yours,, saafsrul fo aBog unnol PIOWOS Thomas C. Wolpert zzoz - n n w TCW/cw Encl. 3A030 3 Q Planning Engineering Land Surveying YOUNG &YOUNG Telephone (631) 727-2303 400 Ostrander Avenue Facsimile (631) 727-0144 Riverhead, New York 11901 admin@youngengineering.com HOWARD W. YOUNG,Land Surveyor - THOMAS C.WOLPERT,Professional Engineer (� DOUGLAS ADAMS,Professional Engineer/Geologist D E C E 0 V E ROBERT STROMSKI,Architect AIiG - 2 2022 Jul July 28, 2022 Southold Town Board of Trustees Attn: Ms. Elizabeth Cantrell Town of Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: Single Family Residence MKS REALTY, LLC 1925 North Sea Drive at Southold, T/0 Southold, NY (20-00153) SCTM No.: 1000-54-04-20 Dear Ms. Cantrell: Enclosed is one (1) full size set of the CMA Group Architectural Drawings A1-0 through A4-1 (10 sheets) last dated January 14, 2022, for your use. Very truly yours, 6101 of Thomas C. Wolpert i TCW/cw Encl. Planning Engineering Land Surveying Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Tom Wolpert <TCW@youngengineering.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 8:49 AM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth Subject: FW: MKS Realty, LLC; SCTM# 1000-54-4-20 Attachments: 1925 N Sea Drive - Construction Set.pdf Good Morning Elizabeth, See below clarification from the Architect and attached Revised Plans, for your review. Please advise if any additional information is needed from us. Also, please note that we are scheduled to stake all proposed structures today. Thank you for your assistance. Tom Tom Wolpert Young&Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead,NY 11901 631.727.2303 tcw@youngengineering.com From:AJ Doucet [mailto:adoucet@cmagroupinc.comj Sent:Tuesday,August 02, 2022 9:01 PM To:Tom Wolpert<TCW@youngenginee ring.com> Subject: MKS Realty, LLC; SCTM#1000-54-4-20 Tom, I'm responding to Elizabeth Cantrell Comments for clarification; • On pg. A3-0 the pile foundation plan depicts a proposed exterior shower,two rooms for a proposed bath, and a mechanical room. On pg.A3-1 the first floor plans,the same is shown. Given this it alludes to the same to be constructed at ground level and at first floor level. This must be clarified and if what appears is not correct the plans should be updated removing one of the two or the project description needs to be updated to explain the proposed. Agreed, because the Master Bedroom Suite Level is much like a Mezzanine Level between the First and Second Floor Levels,we've taken your advice and relocated The master Level on Sheet A3-1 and removed the Exterior Bath and Changing room from A3-1 entirely as it is already depicted on Sheet A3-0 for clarity. 1 • What are the dimensions of each of the two balconies on the second floor? The Balconies on Sheet A3-2 have been provided with the additional information you requested Bedroom Balcony and Railing System-21-10'x 11'-9" (253.5 s.f.) Master Bedroom-Mezzanine Level-Balcony and Railing System 10'-4"x 20'-2" (191.7 s.f.) • There appears to be a patio with stairs to ground off of the first floor and also on the second floor above, please submit dimensions for both patios and width of stairs to ground. If there is only one patio/stair then the plans should be revised to not show the structure on the level it is not being proposed on. The Raised Deck Areas(Patio)on Sheet A3-1 have been provided with the additional information you requested.The stairs were removed as well. • The 1,474sq.ft. of raised deck, is that for the first floor and is it all connected/wrap around or are there separate decking areas. If separate decking areas, each deck/patio must be mentioned and with dimensions. Yes,these are separate deck areas and they have been calculated separately and noted separately in the zoning calculations on Sheet A-1-1 for clarity. • Does the 1,474sq.ft.of raised deck include the catwalk out to the gazebo? If not please submit the dimensions of the catwalk to the gazebo section. Each Deck area is calculated separately now and additional dimensions are noted. • The plans do not depict a storage area under the gazebo,there is an enclosure against the proposed dwelling. Your latest project description states the timber gazebo will be raised with storage below. Please explain or update the project plans if storage is missing. Also what is the size of the storage area? The Gazebo does have storage below.Additional description and dimensions have now been provided.See Sheet A3-4 0 How many feet off ground level is the catwalk/gazebo being proposed. The elevation of the Catwalk varies in height due to the existing undisturbed topography. but ranges between 7.5 ft. and 10.0 ft. above the natural grade. • Is the gazebo open to the sky or is it a roofed over gazebo? The Gazebo is open on all (4)sides and roofed over(Flat Roof.See Sheet A3-4) • What is the width of the proposed stairs to ground off gazebo? The width of the stair and railing is 3'-6"wide and has been noted on the drawings. Anthony Doucet(AJ) CMAgroup 631.675.6214 office 631.675.0364 fax 516.426.1274 mobile www.CMAgroupInc.com 2 aL . YOUNG &YOUNG Telephone (631) 727-2303 400 Ostrander Avenue Facsimile (631) 727-0144 Riverhead, New York 11901 admin@youngengineering.com HOWARD W. YOUNG,Land Surveyor THOMAS C.WOLPERT,Professional Engineer DOUGLAS ADAMS,Professional Engineer/Geologist ROBERT C. TAST,Architect ROBERT STROMSKI,Architect June 3, 2022 Town of Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road �It P.O. Box 1179 D V Southold, New York 11971-0959 SUN 9. 9 2fl RE: Single Family Residence Southold Town MKS REALTY, LLC I Board of Trustees 1925 North Sea Drive at Southold, T/0 Southold, NY (20-00153) SCTM No.: 1000-54-04-20 } Dear Members of the Board: Enclosed are the following items: 1. application fee — MKS Realty, LLC check no. 316 payable to `Town of Southold' in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250.00) for the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Application, 2. one (1) original & three (3) copies— Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Permit Application, 3. one (1) original & three (3) copies— Revised Project Description dated June 3, 2022, 4. four (4) copies — CMA Group Architectural Drawings Al-0 through A4-1 (10 sheets) last dated January 14, 2022, and 5. four (4) prints - Building Permit Survey (Sheets 1-2 of 2) last dated April 27, 2022 amended to address the technical comments indicated in the Southold Trustees Office correspondence dated December 22, 2021. Planning Engineering Land Surveying i C E 1 D JUN _ 9 2022Revised June 3, 2022 November 12, 2021 Southold Town Board of Trustees ATTACHMENT TO BOARD OF TRUSTEES APPLICATION prepared for MKS Realty, LLC at Southold, T/0 Southold, New York Proiect Description The project consists of constructing a new 2 story frame house & garage (2,445 sf footprint), raised'deck (1,474 sf), in-ground pool (522 sf), gazebo with storage below (100 sf), front entry.stairs (663 sf), stone blend driveway (4,095.sf), public water service connection; new sanitary system, ie. one (1) 500 gal. wastewater treatment unit and six (6)-8.5'L by 2' effect. depth sanitary leaching galleys (IAOWTS), and new storm water control structures for roof runoff and driveway runoff. Lot.Coverage Proposed Structure Area Percent Coverage Frame House & Garage 2,445 sf 4.2 Raised Deck 1,474 sf 2.5 Pool 522 sf 0.9 YO Storage Shed 100 sf 0.2 Front Entry Stairs 663 sf 1.1 Driveway 4,095 sf 6.9 Total 9,299 sf 15.8 Page 2 of 2 June 3, 2022 Please note that: 1. the proposed boulders by the front porch represent an aesthetic feature of the architecture plan and do not serve any structural purpose, 2. no retaining walls are proposed, 3. an in-ground pool with wrap around steps is proposed, 4. a patio around the pool is proposed, 5. a timber catwalk from the pool to the gazebo is proposed, 6. the timber gazebo will be raised with storage below, 7. a first floor (9' by 17') structure second story above with balcony and spiral stairway just west of the dwelling is proposed, 8. mechanical equipment ie. A.C. unit will be located above the second story structure described in #7 above, 9. no generator or outdoor shower is proposed, 10. no curbing along the stone blend driveway is proposed, 11. approximately 690 cubic yards of clean material from the excavated areas will be used to fill the site to the proposed grades, 12. the limits of proposed fill are shown on the plans, 13. the plans have been amended to indicate six (6) storm water tributary areas, proposed drainage structures, and drainage calculations. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact US. Very truly yours, ///Ar/XW c, � ® E C E 014 C Thomas C. Wolpert JUN - 9 2022 TCW/cw Southold Town Encl. Board of Trustees cc. MKS Realty, LLC Attn: Mr. Antonios Vournou + encl. + 1 print ��gUFFOt�.c ��O oGy John O.Stein,Chairperson co y Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Lauren Standish,Secretary d P.O.Box 1179 • `F Southold,NY 11971 y'tlpl �.a0� Telephone(631)765-1889 Fax(631)765-1823 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., July 6, 2022 the following recommendation was made: MKS REALTY, LLC to construct a new two-story frame house and garage (2,445 sf. footprint), raised deck (1,474 sf.), in-ground pool (522 sf.), gazebo with storage below (1.00 sf.) front entry stairs (663 sf.), stone blend driveway (4,095 sf.), public water service connection, new sanitary system, ie. one (1) 500 gallon wastewater treatment unit and six (6) 8.5'1_ by 2' effect. depth sanitary leaching galleys (IAOWTS), and new stormwater control structures for roof run-off and driveway run-off. Located: 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold. SCTM#54-4-20 Inspected by: John Stein, Caroline Burghardt, Carol Brown, John Chandler, Maggie Merrill, Inga Van Eysden The project was not staked, therefore no recommendation could be made at this time. The CAC requests the project be staked with labeled flags and the opportunity to submit a thori ugh review and recommendation at a future meeting. 0 John G.Stein,Chairperson Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Lauren(Standish,Secretary $ P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 y'�Ol �►aO� Telephone(631)765-1889 Fax(631)765-1823 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., January 12, 2 1 22 the following recommendation was made: Moved by Carol Brown, seconded by John Stein, it was RESOLVED to NOT SUPPORT the application of MKS REALTY, LLC to construct a new two-story frame house and garage, together with associated site improvements including a pool, deck, shed, electric service, public water service, sewage disposal system, and stone blend driveway. Located: 1925 North Sea Dr., Southold. SCTM#54-4-20 Insp i cted by: John Stein, Carol Brown The CAC does Not Support the application. There is a concern with the proposed project being located within a primary dune and FEMA flood zone, and the swimming pool should be located on the landward side of the dwelling. Votel of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Cantrell, Elizabeth Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2021 12:42 PM To: 'Tom Wolpert' Subject: MKS Realty LLC; SCTM# 1000-54-4-20 Tom, Regarding you application for MKS Realty, LLC,this application is considered incomplete by Trustee President, Glenn Goldsmith and will not be added to the January 19, 2022 public hearing date. At this time,the following is required: 1. $250.00 application fee for a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Application 2. Coastal Erosion Hazard Area application document. 3. Project description is incomplete. Proposed boulders by front porch? Please submit details. All retaining walls need material, length,width, height. The pool says it is proposed to be in-ground but it appears to have wrap around steps? Please explain/modify. Patio around pool. Walkway to shed and the shed. Will the shed be at grade or raised? What is the area to the west off of the dwelling that states 2nd story above/storage? Please add 2nd story balcony with stairs dimensions. Any a/c units,generator areas, outdoor shower need to be part of the description. Will the driveway have curbing? Please add if yes. There is approx.400 cubic yards of fill being added from what is being excavated? Please be specific in details in the written description as well as on the plans as to where this is coming from and where it is being graded out. 4. Roof/Impervious structure Runoff containment is not depicted on the plans, please update the plans to be in compliance with Chapter 236 of the Town Code. 5. The site plans submitted are incomplete. The site plans require dimensions and what it is (i.e. patio, dwelling, pool,etc.)for every structure proposed which was not included. 6. Plealse submit four(4)finalized stamped full sets of building/construction plans for the file. 7. Please submit four(4) complete stamped sets of side view elevations from the street through to the proposed shed area. Sincerely, Senior Officl Assistant Town of Soythold Board of Trustees Office: 631-765.1892 f) Email: elizaliethc@southoldtownny.gov 1 , 1 V}} MISS Realty LLC 7 7 P/ieadowbrook Road Syosset,NY 11791 516-924-2877 The Town of Southold Board of Trustees Southold Town Hatt Annex �, ,g —, b4375 Main Rd. J E- '' !P.O.Box 1179 I 1 Southold,NY 11971 DEC 1 0 2021 December 10,2021 Southold lovvn Rngrcl of Trustees To whom it may concern: This correspondence is to confirm that Antonios Vournou is a member of MKS Realty LLC and is authorized to sign on its behalf. Warm Regards, Anton" i Vournou MEMBER avournou@earestoration.com Glenn Goldsmith,President Town Hall Annex A. Nicholas Krupski,Vice President 54375 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 John M. Bredemeyer III Southold,New York 11971 Michael J.Domino @ Telephone(631) 765-1892 Greg Williams Fax(631) 765-6641 coUiV1V,' BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD This Section For Office Use Only Coastal Erosion Permit Application c/ Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit Amendment/Transfer/Extension NOV 1 8 2021 Received Application: 11►�$2� Received Fee: $ ZSO,DD Completed Application: III 2*zl Soul Incomplete: _ Board'of SEQRA Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted Negative Dec. Positive Dec. Lead Agency Determination Date: Coordination:(date sent): —� MW Consistency Assessment Form Sent: � AC Referral Sent:. Date of Inspection: ' Receipt of CAC Report: Technical Review: Public Hearing Held: i l Resolution: Owner(s)Legal Name of Property (as shown on Deed): L G Mailing Address: `7.7 M eadowlbroc,& Koacf SyosSe , IVY' 11 -791 Phone Number: E71 6, 9 21 — -70 30 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - 54- — - Property Location: t ct2 5 N'yrrr(f) Seca Dn v'(:f:. 5cakn o(c1' , 1 q 7 I\10+fh Sick or N(orH--) Sea Dnlve, opprole , /,-7y�5 1 ecasf 6-F k_enn�, T�oacf (If necessary, provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT(If applicable): Yount 4- Yo un a A ftf, : l)o w o s C WO I P er{ , R. E-, Mailing Address: 400 O SfrTcrn cf'�� �'✓�. l�t'V � l (`)o f' Phone Number: G <— 27—Z Email: _�CvU La QOY09 e/? i n fif at25Ccm s Board of Trustees Appl, tion GENERAL, DATA Land Area(in square feet): 5n Area Zoning: R e s i d enf l a l Previous use of property: Va corn I- Intended use of property: S7(n c,(� EcPryZ i�� ��5fc�7 c� Covenants and Restrictions on property? Yes r/ No If"Yes",please provide a copy. Will this project require a Building Permit as per Town Code? . �/ Yes No If"Yes", be advised this application will be reviewed by the Building Dept. prior to a Board of Trustee review and Elevation Plans will be required. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals? Yes t/ No If"Yes", please provide copy of decision. Will this project require any demolition as per Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept.? Yes ✓ No Does the structure (s) on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy? Yes No A//A Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date V' No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? V/ No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary): Con`!�frucf 4 ncfcV Z s'fory �v�m e r Mous-G d- c�Gprzec�� ,�-ocreffn�r Wi� —l� ass©ctcrf�ct�/ Siff �ry�pryr����e�� Servac'r, 5-ev✓Q�e-ctrs2o�( i5�stern r and Sfoa)elolend JdycU✓ce�4. y Board of Trustees Appl_ Ltion WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATI®N DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: 7-hh-e s?cerp o se- o)ir -{h e pro i e� /-5 �o con sf-Uc� C? /) f1, / --o Z 5Nr�4 jq-am-e Aot--e r(a fed 5i(e- Area of wetlands on lot: square feet Percent coverage of lot: b'® ( % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: A feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? No ✓ Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? lfD 0 cubic yards How much material will be filled? +00 cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: 60 feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: Le Ss -than 5 u7 Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: A n e- r-a 1.'ctfo� W(11 lOe _used lo remove- and de-posrf mc7ferfcd wqj6r'g fG►n. cp("(�o 03, 0 fi'on s. Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): There- w[([ be no e-rFfc+ on We-flGncks and fi'da/ Wafers oc Ae- To wn J a s c re s c{4 07,!f-' -th 4ropos-ed orc hon5 , November 12, 2021 ATTACHMENT TO BOARD OF TRUSTEES APPLICATION prepared for MKS Realty, LLC, at Southold, T/O Southold, New York Project Description The project consists of constructing a new 2 story frame house & garage (1,873 sf footprint), front porch (389 sf) and stairs (137 sf), rear deck (1,218 sf) and stairs (31 sf), side deck (166 sf) and stairs (28 sf), covered deck (522 sf), in ground pool (335 sf), stone blend driveway (2,341 sf), public water service connection, new sanitary system, ie. one (1) 500 gal. wastewater treatment unit and six (6) 8.5'L by 2' effect. depth sanitary leaching galleys (IAOWTS), and new storm water control structures for roof runoff and driveway runoff. Lot Coverage Proposed Structure Area Percent Coverage 2 Story Frame House 1,873 sf 3.2 % Front Porch 398 sf 0.7 % Storage Room 136 sf 0.2 % In Ground Pool 335 sf 0.6 % Covered Deck 522 sf 0.9 % Side Deck 166 sf 0.3 % Rear Decks 1,218 sf 2.1 % Structure (Storage Shed) 100 sf 0.1 % Total 4,748 sf 8.1 % Board of Trustees Applica;~ )n- COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: Coll s-6r e � n�r.V 2 S�prV-�rcrm� A oc rSe a u rag-e-- wife, %m g�royewet-?Is /r7 duaPi o�� �oo/ c��ck G�a�wal� lcrn�fll�s �i�s, . GIa-�eloo ,r,�rff�.:s-�or��_.�oelor�v Sfo�cG�(�n� driyewer�;. , . Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? � ^No _,Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? _ No _ �/ _. .Yes If Yes,how much material will be excavated?. 491V - (pubic yards) How much material will be filled? %1�. (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited:,, A n., f-X a ct Vc,.�r Cin S f"ctir efi o a �/Le- �t-oflos�� �` p roVcf-M* --n— . . Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts to the subject property or neighboring properties reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation the project as proposed, including erosion increase or adverse effects on natural protective features. (Use attachments if necessary) _A ra (4i ng, -Fee)c,,- will !e- c©n (;vHh Cl-ectriag:-, Grrzadir�g aa►d Qrout)d elr�furh�/Ye� i i s will 6X- Mam��jr),fcP ur)h�j con sh'u 0n aefi'V%Ftrs k)cQbl-e 6---ern eoen�2l-cl -cd 40 F-ropfnrf�x ore-1 Qlr)(Cori AU Fryg2 ed C�C1 sf-rZ.r�fion�c7�yi-Frr -H/ien r �} 61 Z20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions fonfomnletiag Part l -Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part l-Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: M K 5 Q-ecI if LLC Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 192-G7 /v0ri-h Sea Drives Socio/-o lv' e Ncr4A side. o•F Nodi Sec( Dr(Ve— approx. !i7 r�` easf of trenn)Ls poRdp Brief Description of Proposed Action: COnsfrt.rc-- cr new L sfror/ -Fang-e- 's-e d- Jca�Gscf:.. - 0 gef )I&(- Wr( ') -fin-if- a ssoC_I a fed Site_ ire p r-0 vervlen t7--, I n 0(uCt(n5 Poo/) deck) shed/ elft-h--c servrC_-e pt"Wo/tc- Wat-er ) S-ev✓e-?Se- �rs�nc�scz� sYs{�uv� crs�d _5 nnebl-end dri vewa y. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: M K S R2cclf LL-C., E-Mail ctvoc t rnota G ear-es or `c n corn Address: -7-7 M brook Road S� o s se City/PO: State: Zip Code: S oss c4- NeVt` Yo'* r!•7 9/ 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO .YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that ❑ ❑ may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. if no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: NYS:DEG—Volo( We-1-lc>nd Rerngik ot- Left--,- or' No JE,,rrsdl, °-67n F]SC�H5— Wa•fcr sup I-,- •f se UR9� TICSoy � i p r * 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 1 ,5 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0. !A acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 1---35 _acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban El Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial Mesidential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Aquatic ❑Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 4 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES I N/A a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ ® ❑ b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? © ❑ 6. is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? ❑ 0 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: _ El 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES o ❑ b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? n ❑ c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? L©J 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: 0 C�7 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: Th e project rncludrz consfru Qn cr a new s aria is oar( S s m t8,aw s , 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? R] El- b. b. Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? Z E 13.a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ❑ b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? Fv_� El If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: Q"Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland ❑Urban ['Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, ❑ a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties. NO YES b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ❑NO OYES Sform Wder wlll 19, olireefed -{o 00-5ite. 4rainc;p -eckc-h i c, pools and dr y We(1-,, Page 2 of 4 18.Does the proposed action include construction'or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO ' YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: ❑ 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AHn ., 7-Aomct5 C. Wal pe-d-) P,f, Applicant/sponso name: YOUAQ ,�/Y�U(lG L Date: NOV; Signature: ��i,!2' G2//I /(/ /l�l1L� Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the.following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? ❑ 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? ❑ L__I I Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the a establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? ET 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or ❑ affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate ❑ reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: ❑ ❑ a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, ❑ architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, ❑ waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occu11 occur 10. W ill the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? ❑ Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Town of Southold-Board of Trustees Name of Lead Agency Date President Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT Page 4 of 4 Board of Trustees Appl . ._ Ltion AUTHORIZATION (Where the applicant is not the owner) I/We, I"i KS R1°alf �I LLC_ AVh-) ; Ar4onlro.5 Vournou owners of the property identified as SCTM# 1000- 64- 04--,270 in the town of .Soufh ®1 cQ ,New York, hereby authorizes . younG V�- YouA!a A Hn : l holy,a s C, Wo l pe-d- , P, C, to act as my agent and handle all necessary work involved with the application process for permit(s) from the Southold Town Board of Trustees for this property. Prope y wner's Signature Property Owner's Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 06US-?/_ , 20 otary Public MANOLI KALAMOTOUSAKIS NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No. 02KA6213500 Quallfled in Queens County oy Commisslon Expires November 09,20�� t Board of Trustees Apply ,A� tion AFFIDAVIT 4 n-fon(o s V o urn ou . BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HVSHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S),IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION,I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES,THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES,INCLUDING THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL,TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS APPLICATION, INCLUDING A FINAL INSPECTION. I FURTHER AUTHORIZE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY AND AS REQUIRED TO INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ANY CONDITION OF ANY WETLAND OR COASTAL EROSION PERMIT ISSUED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES DURING THE TERM OF THE PERMIT. X - Signature of Property Owner Signature of Property Owner Anfonio5 Vournou SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS . 5+.L, DAY OF. oc'.-�'�, , 20 C Notary Public MANOLI'KALAMOTOUSAKIS NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No. 02KA6213500 Qualified In Queens County MY Commission Explres November 09,20af APPLICANUAGENUREPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE,FORM -"- e Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits cooflicis ofihtcrcst on the phit of town officers and P-rnpjg=s.Thepurpse of this fbrm'is to provide information which can Write town of 99kible conflibts of interest and allow i0o,take whatever action J$! YOURNAME: MKS Rea tf�4 , LA-C, 14#h ,, An�1-)iO-s Wurf)ou (Last name,first name,jpiddle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicatetheother person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other',name the activity.) Do you ipersonally,(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have,a feldtionship with any officer-or employee of the Town of;Sbuthold? "Relaflon'sbip"includes by'blood,fijarriagc,;or business interest".Business interest"means it business, including a partnership,in which the't6wri'officer.or employee has even a-parlial own erAip of(oi emp cpilJorati6n in which the town officer or employee owns more than 55,91 oftfia shares. YES NO t-11 If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person on employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): the owner of-greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of ihe.ppplicont (when the applicant is a corporation); the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity the applicant is not a corporation); an off cer,director,partnei,or employee of the applicant;or the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this dayof 04AOr 20 21 §ignature X -10— PrintName- 'ja� r,joyoumou Form TS I 9-IFALXI 1Board of Trustees Applicat. PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS APPLICATION NAME & SCTM#: NAME: ADDRESS: L/ STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK , residing at , being duly'sworn, deposes and says that on the day of , 20 , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office located at , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAILIRETURN RECEIPT. Signature Sworn to before me this Day of , 20 Notary Public YOUNG &YOUNG Telephone (631) 727-2303 400 Ostrander Avenue Facsimile (631) 727-0144 Riverhead, New York 11901 admin@youngengineering.com HOWARD W. YOUNG, Land Surveyor THOMAS C. WOLPERT,Professional Engineer DOUGLAS ADAMS, Professional EngineerlGeolgSist ROBERT STROMSKI,Architect (� D EC E019E August 15, 2022 AUG 1 5 2022 Town of Southold Board of Trustees Southold Town Town Hall Annex Board of Trustees 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: Single Family Residence MKS REALTY, LLC 1925 North,,Sea Drive at Southold, T/O Southold, NY (20-0153) SCTM No.: 1000-54-04-20 Dear Members of the Board: Enclosed is the original signed & notarized Proof of Mailing of Notice Form, together with the original Certified Mail Receipts, for your use. Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert TCW/cw Encl. Planning Engineering Land Surveying Board of Trustees Application PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS M t<'5 F�eor t(1-1 L-L.G APPLICATION NAME & SCTM#: /00 0— NAME: --NAME: ADDRESS: Rofieref- C-,-. (-3oaN6Ge 14, 16, 3rd AVet)uc!f- 2 Loc.t'rs �ilQsip 25 C��Perrs Lcp� � R�vo��G,(� ��sf Levitfor�n J MY 6, Sore n-e V lof-fi E3 / --3--37 N)"' l l ? 7l O JDse�h Bc crr� � cano -2120 I/• 5ecr 1)rtVe: NY -71 STATE OF NEW • ORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Thoma-' C, PE, , residing at f ( c 10( being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the day of A(a L,,uf, 2022 , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office located at R i lr` �7Ccr� /'�J��VI xorlh that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. Sworn to before me this Signature Day of —. 20 Q� �'1 O/M Ct S e. G�'ol��, ,�c= •� (� ELIZABETH A.FALLON NOWY Public'state of New Yarn Notar ublic ND.D21A5069367 y COMMI�fanJ F�p es*V tuber'7)i,flM Postal CERTIFIED o RECEIPT Ln . nty CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT . , _nc 11 4 .. • -191&1111 Ln Awn nj Howl _ u -r 1 1)ivy ' Lavit.t06i�t +�Y' i 7� m Certified Melt Fee ac: $4 O S , MM CartFwad MfalI IF . 1`•-a c �¢.l El! - �•� r-1 Extra ervIc,s&FaaS(clieckboK addf :art` 0 $ f.Q` ❑Return R..01(6-. $ _,, _datoJ v r-1 ra 3tr' ,..� ices&Fe fcr-.ack acs, odd ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ t ,IJ I, _ Q F— Q Fe[um Receipt(hardcopy) $ ❑Certified Mall ResMded Delivery $ •� ;;1 0 Fr' �"'l ❑Return Receipt C3 - Here r p Pt(electronic) S f 1. ) - p ❑Adult Signature Required S -, '• ❑Certltled Mall Restricted Delivery $ r ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery§ C3 ❑Adult Signature Required U C3 PostRg C3 []Adult Signature Rinlricted Delivery S - r-.1 $ $l i,$4 O Postage US1'" 20 4 � Total Postage and Fels r•� S $1-1•L co Total POStage and 322 C3ru p Sento Lia C3 Siieera:td t a. w a - «. r ----.»-_—---�. _. ru 1 C�l _«__ >'�: Postalzan k1 CERTIFIED o RECEIPT U.S. Postal r_ Domestic Mail OnlyCERTIFIEDMAIL@ RECEIPT ..nEr • rq CoSou lt[r•+ A . 0 Certified Mail Fee$4.1111 f ti :: ! MSoU �f19 1 1 �, +1 cerrtrea Mall Fee ra raServices&Fees(chUr*jX�,W ❑ V r p S❑ Raturn ..1 C ❑Return Rocerpi 0Wcom L7 pReturn Receipt Servicosees 6:bo kboyador ❑CerPgd heRlos.nwadDelivery Poslrnerk tvmRecol€t9-dcopy) $ ❑AdvtSlgatuaqurad Hal tum R W(Wecroay DAWSgnalura D�Z � md Mall RadDlivey $ P`ost�m akp 8 $ e1v°y pQAdltSinaGm Requirdp PSfage r' p S 6 T $ $1_1.,8,4 0AduttsrgnatwoRestrictedDelivery$ �O TatalPasra88andp Poslege Fens jIv /•7( $1;.$4 $3.419 cos " Tetal Postage and Fees /f I22 prq met pt}I(o, r �ox «.mow.. p Sent To > _.._ ----------- ru f�eine r r rrr•r• �' 7/ ..� r r r r�r•r. - - - - SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY rnmnl,-fA itemm,'i-.9-and 3-Also complete A. Signoture AA— I— El Addressee B. F;eceived by(Printed Name) C.Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits. 1 Article Addressed to: D. :s delivery addreqs 1? llq7( fled Mail L3 Express Mail E3 Registered 13 Return Receipt for Merchandise 13 Insured Mail 1:1 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) 13 Yes 2. Article�im^� mai ?020 1810 0001 1034 1689 ----- 3811,February Glenn Goldsmith,PresidentS ieca uFFQI� Town Hall Annex A.Nicholas Krupski,Vice President ►�t1 54375 Route 25 Eric Sepenoski v ` ' P.O. Box 1179 rrn a Liz Gillooly +gyp + Southold,NY 11971 Elizabeth Peeples y4j 6� Telephone 631 765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD --------------------------------------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of MKS REALTY, LLC COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING DO NOT COMPLETE THIS FORM UNTIL THE POSTING HAS REMAINED INPLA CRFOR AT LEAST SEVEN DA YS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE- COMPLETE THIS FORM ON EIGTH DAY OR LATER I, n om'?:5 L" fir" yl aerl- /dba " u/1 400 1?-scane � �nu� KIueri els- /QY being duly sworn, depose and say: That on the bfh day of A4c.P,5u s f , 2022-, 1 personally posted the property known as 19 :2-,5 Norte Sea -Z)riV-Cn- so�rfL»l cP A ICY by placing the Board of Trustees official noticing poster where it can easily be seen from the street, and that I have checked to be sure the noticing poster has remained in place for a full seven days immediately preceding the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wednesday,August 17,2022. Dated: (signature) Sworn to before me this k4 day of-Acujv-20 83 cLIL41:+ETH A.FAt_l.GN notary Public,State of New York No.oirA5069367 Qualffied in Suffolk County commission Expires November 5,7W Not Public ' i • 4 � �; ._ . . ` - .� 4; 1.ate!' �` k�Pr�. •� �.v��y.' Glx :� ��f .I, - � . .° l -.-- , ` -.•�',y S I'}`�" a �Ip r! `",r S � i P' � P ' rr N`�. .r s�ti�ir';�����r .Y s � •���,� �' rr.'y } r # ,� y. •� qj i P , ! r •s .rr.rf -. .-..j..E.dTM_eh....-r-'S��•rwv. 1 t 1 Glenn Goldsmith,President r�F S0Town Hall Annex A.Nicholas Krupski,Vice President ,�®� ®�� 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Eric Sepenoski Southold, New York 11971 Liz Gillooly e� Elizabeth Peeples Telephone(631) 765-1892' � Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS PROPOSED PROJECT TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 17, 2022 AT OR ABOUT 5:30P.M. IN THE TOWN HALL MEETING HALL PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR: Young & Young on behalf of MKS REALTY, LLC LOCATED: 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold; SCTM# 1000-54-4-20 For a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to construct a two- story 2,445sq.ft. footprint dwelling with garage; a proposed 21 '10"x11'9" (253.5sq.ft.) seaward bedroom balcony with railing system; a proposed 10'4"x20'2" (191 .7sq.ft.) mezzanine level bedroom balcony, railing system, a privacy screen wall along west side, and a 6' wide spiral staircase to ground; a 1 ,218.8aq.ft. elevated deck with a 522sq.ft. pool on seaward side, privacy screening along portion of east side, a 3'9" wide stairs with railings to ground to west and a 3'6" stairs with railings to ground to east; proposed 10' wide bar/grill area on pool deck; seaward of pool to the east off pool patio, a proposed 203.6sq.ft. elevated (ranging from x-7.5' to 10' above natural grade) catwalk leading to a 127.9sq.ft. open air gazebo with flat roof over, 3'6" wide stairs with railings to ground, and 110.6sq.ft. storage area under gazebo; proposed 663sq.ft. of non-pervious front entry stairs; proposed 4,095sq.ft. of stone blend driveway; proposed 1 ,200 gallon underground propane tank; new I/A OWTS sanitary system, i.e. one (1) 500 gallon wastewater treatment unit and six (6) 8.5' long by 2' effect. depth sanitary leaching galleys; public water service connection; new storm water control structures for roof runoff and driveway runoff; approximately 690 cubic yards of clean material from the excavated areas will be used to fill the site to the proposed grades; and all mechanical equipment (i.e. A/C unit), to be located above the second- story structure. NUTILL---- UF HLARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the Southold Town Board of Trustees at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. OWNER(S) OF RECORD: MKS REALTY, LLC SUBJECT OF PUBLIC HEARING: Please see attached Project Description Page posted with this Notice. TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING : Wednesday, August 17, 2022 — at or about 5:30P.M. If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are available online at www.southoldtownny.gov and/or in the Trustee Office until to the day of the hearing during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. BOARD OF TRUSTEES * TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631) 765-1892 Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions,that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Townof Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including:Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering,the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action Will be< evaluated as to i. ..... bn' � - ........., its. si : ficant: beneficial and::advefse-effects upon the coastal area(which includes 61, of Southold:I'owri)` 3.: If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. .Thus, each answer must.W ex lamed in.defa' listim p both Sld{Dportin_g and nob- 0 porting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,if shall not be.uhdertakeri. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 10 0 a -. 64- 10 4- _ 2D PROJECT NAME_ MKS 9�,ecr(fii , LLC J The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of TrusteesZ 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate'response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g.capital construction,planning activity,agency regulation,land transaction) (b) Financial assistance(e.g.grant,loan,subsidy) (c) Permit, approval,license,certification: Nature and extent of action: Co n sfru c-F a new 2 s rk/- -�,,am h ous� d- 5ara9� -{-o a�fG�er w i-I-G, -I`h-e Ct ss®e i a t�c� Si l-e I'mfg Qyved�l�f5 -in eludiylc, wool , dectc , 5hed , el-ecfnc sP�-yLc� , 'u6lrc- waher SerVicz .Bergh e- M , once Stene blend dre'Vewo Location of action: 19 2 f\lorHq Sea D r('V e, of So&A01 c./ Site acreage: I o 39-30 acres or ge) ?-36 s-C Present land use: Vol can f Present zoning classification: Desi d enfi a I 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: N KS beef(f�i , LLn+On(0s V9urnou (b) Mailingaddress: `77 NeadoWbroofs �ocd Syoss�f- , NY I 1 -791 (c) Telephone number: Area Code( ;) 91& -- '�2( — 7r-3 C) (d) Application number,if any: N/ Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes 0 No❑ If yes, which state or federal agency? NYS D EC — T j do( W e-f lance Fermi- or- L-e-ffer- vi No ,Tur sdicfion C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, snakes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LV RW Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Z Yes .0 No ❑ Not Applicable -f of)5 c A cf ct n ecu 2 Sfory -Film e- f)Oct 5e v- gcarr a c �oGettner eyi�fi �l�l� CtsSoc i cr l-ecP sit i mRr'oyewlenf5 i nclucl'rn� moa/ �(e V s/i�o0 eleclS�s� ood sNne blcr\d c@riUecyav, Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ®. Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable - Th e— Pro,2 ospcP h ouses - 9 araq-c— VV at oma' t-ec�u i r--ed *1010d ei-e_✓C?h0n , Per >=CF`?A- , an ct l_a nd wayd Of il,e -{-i'c(ce( Wef(ao�� bounc�ce , Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria 2 Yes ❑ No ❑Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. 0 ❑ ❑ es No Not Applicable q-eFvlict 1 J Attach additional sheets ifnecessary - Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LNW Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑. Yes ❑No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. El Yes ❑ No R1 Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LVW Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. nn 0 WE] No❑ Not Applicable R'e-F?,-40 t olfcy I R-e-sPonSt� , Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III--Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes 0 No ❑ Not Applicable ' k'e0-4- 4o Po I ect,. I 1�fe2p2n s,:f_ . . Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary 1 Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages-65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑✓ Not Applicable PREPARED BY _2 ornys C, WOlD E. TITLE DATE 11--12-21 , YOUNG &YOUNG Telephone(631) 727-2303 400 Ostrander Avenue Facsimile(631) 727-0144 Riverhead,New York 11901 admin@youngengineering.com HOWARD W. YOUNG,Land Surveyor THOMAS C.WOLPERT,Professional Engineer DOUGLAS ADAMS,Professional Engineer/Geologist ROBERT C. TAST,Architect D E G E � V E ROBERT STROMSKI,Architect November 12, 2021 NOV 1 8 2021 Town of Southold Board of Trustees Southold Town Board of Trustees Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: Single Family Residence MKS REALTY, LLC 1925 North Sea Drive at Southold, T/O Southold, NY (20-00153) 1 SCTM No.: 1000-54-0-20 Dear Members of the Board: Enclosed are the following items: 1. application fee — MKS Realty, LLC check no. 1156 payable to `Town of Southold' in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250.00), 2. one (1) original & three (3) copies—Wetland ,Permit Application and Attachment dated November 12, 2021, 3. one (1) original & three (3) copies—Short Environmental Assessment Form, 4. one (1) original & three (3) copies—Authorization Form, 5. one (1) .original & three (3) copies—Affidavit, 6. one (1) original & three (3) copies—Applicant Transactional Disclosure Form, 7. one (1) original & three (3) copies — LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, 8. three (3) color copies— Photograph Nos. 1-8, and Planning Engineering Land Surveying Page 2of2 November 12, 2021 9. three (3) prints— Building Permit Survey (Sheets 1-2 of 2) last dated November 12, 2021 depicting the existing conditions and proposed improvements. We understand that submission of these documents enables you to complete your review of this application. If you have any questions or require any additional information, .please contact us. Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert TCW/cw Encl. cc. MKS Realty, LLC Attn: Mr. Antonios Vournou + encl. + 1 print Town of Southold " P.O Box 11,79,, --- Southold, NY ,11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 01/19/23 Receipt#: 307790 Quantity, Transactions Reference Subtotal 1 Application For Appeal 2023-1 $250.00 Total Paid: $250.00 Notes: check from Patricia C Moore Payment Type Amount Paid By CK#11014 $250.00 Realty, Mks Southold Town Clerk's Office 53095 Main Road, PO Bax 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Name: Realty, Mks 1925 North Sea Drive ,Southold, NY 11971 Clerk ID: DENISN Internal ID:2023-1 Noncarrow, Denis From: Noncarrow, Denis Sent: Wednesday,January 18, 2023 1:36 PM To: e-mailcontact@dec.ny.gov'; DiSalvo, Diane; Cantrell, Elizabeth; Doherty,Jill; Doroski, Greg; Louisa Evans; Mealy, Brian; Nappa, Sarah; Noncarrow, Denis; Norklun, Stacey, Rudder, Lynda; Russell, Scott; Standish, Lauren; Tomaszewski, Michelle; Mirabelli, Melissa; DeChance, Paul Cc: Born, Sabrina; Mudd, Jennifer Subject: Coastal Erosion Appeal./ MKS Realty Please see link below to an Application for a Coastal Erosion hazard review. Thank you Denis Noncarrow Southold Town Clerk. Town of Southold, New York www.southoldtownny.gov d en isn @sou thold to wn ny.gov 631-765-1800 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This cornmunication with its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication. From: Norklun,Stacey Sent: Wednesday,January 18, 2023 1:18 PM To: Noncarrow, Denis<denisn@southoldtownny.gov> Subject: MKS Here is the link to the MKS Realty Coastal Erosion file: littp://24.38.28.228:2040/webli nk/0/doc/1260423/Pagel.aspx 1 Noncarrow, Denis From: Noncarrow, Denis Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2023 7:59 AM To: Tomaszewski, Michelle Cc: . Rudder, Lynda; Born, Sabrina Subject: Coastal Erosion Hazard Review Application Hi Michelle We sent this application around and it should go on next work session. If you need anything let us know. Thank you Denis Noncarrow Southold Town Clerk. Town of Southold, New York www.southoldtownny.aov denisn@southoldtownny.gov 631-765-1800 i CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication with its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication. 1 Noncarrow, Denis From: Patricia C. Moore <pcmoore@mooreattys.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 8:46 AM To: Noncarrow, Denis Cc: Betsy Perkins Subject: Re: Public hearing Thank you!!! I just let everyone know. On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 8:33 AM Noncarrow, Denis <denisn ,southoldtowM. ov> wrote: Ii Should be at 10:30 start. That is what I am told. l i i Denis Noncarrow i 3 Southold Town Clerk. Town of Southold, New York i www.southoldtownny.gov i denisn@southoldtownny.gov southoldtownny.gov 631-765-1800 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication with its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication. i I From: Patricia C. Moore [mailto:pcmoore@mooreattys.com1 Sent:Tuesday, February 28, 2023 8:10 AM To: Noncarrow, Denis<denisn@southoldtownny.gov> Cc: Betsy Perkins<betsy@mooreattys.com> i Subject: Re: Public hearing I Hi Dennis. I have the experts and others coming to the public hearing for the Coastal Erosion Hearing and some people are traveling. Everyone is asking what time the hearing is going to start. It was scheduled for 9 so I assumed 2 hour delay (11). But then I saw work session starts at 10:30. Can you please confirm the time asap. Pat i 6n-Tue., Feb 28, 2023 at 7:59 AM Noncarrow, Denis <denisn gsoutholdtownny._ov> wrote: f I Iam at town hall now. What time can you drop off? 1 t On Feb 28, 2023 7:19 AM, Betsy Perkins <betsykmooreattys.com> wrote: Hi Denis. Hoping you will see this before opening at 10. What time will our hearing be? F Thanks so much!! E 1 I �t Betsy Perkins, Paralegal ! PLEASE REPLY TO ALL --------------------------- Mailing &Physical Address: i ij Moore Law Offices 51020 Main Road j William D. Moore, Esq. Southold NY 11971 631.765.4663 Fax Number: j I Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 631.765.4643 631.765.4330 www.mooreattys.com<http://www.moo I eattys.com/> 3 ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. i i Patricia C. Moore, Esq. i PLEASE BE SURE TO COPY MY ASSISTANTS 1 betsynmoo reattvs.corn and kvleean,moo reattvs.com t jMailing & Physical Address: Moore Law Offices 51020 Main Road William D. Moore, Esq. Southold NY 11971 j 631.765.4663 Fax Number: Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 631.765.4643 631.765.4330 www.mooreattys.com Patricia C. Moore, Esq. PLEASE BE SURE TO COPY MY ASSISTANTS betsya,moo reattvs.com,and kylee(Wmoo reattvs.com --------------------------- Mailing & Physical Address: 2 Moore Law Offices 51020 Main Road William D. Moore, Esq. Southold NY 11971 631.765.4663 Fax Number: Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 631.765.4643 631.765.4330 www.mooreattys.com 3 : �r n J , r ' �.. ., . WT MR 77 Rol r ,: SITE , a . r E • y =C 6 7' v� CCC 11�' i lei w ' At. w F i ilk -tip!P irr 1 in= 167 ft 0 50 100 200 ft z Jj WNW ti 1994 Line of Development (Note 1 ) Parcel (Note 2) ,. . SITE •" I� ;, y :� � �;;: NOTES ' x n- : yam:. • , ',' ` yy yam.y � �� 994 ' , •''; *� � _ `f' ! :b �P'-,.r �'�i' Line of Development digitized from 1994 high resolution aerial. _ 1 Development line based on closest aerial image to enactment of - ► g Chapter 111 (CERA) by the Town of Southold. Aerial obtained from NYS GIS Clearinghouse. r 2. Proposed development and Parcel boundary digitized from Proposed 1 in= 100 ft . '. >- Site Plan prepared by CMA Group, last revised 12/19/2022. Plan . .: georeferenced to 2020 orthoimage. 0 25 50 100 3 Basem p is 2020 orthoirnage from NYS GIS Clearinghouse. ft _. m, X - >� - +� � � ate*' d�>;: „-:.►. Prepared By: Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. Project:EXISTING DEVELOPMENT 570 Expressway Drive South, Suite 2F For: Ed Licalzi LandUseMedford,NY 11763 At: 1925 North Sea Dr., Southold,NY SCTM #1000- 54 -4 -20 Date: 2/27/2023 Revised: Scale:As Noted Sheet:ED-1 I - r.r , ;6+ aY .Lot#15.3 ... .' , r 25,74&SF - Lot#18 _ � _ ,_. , �. Lot#24 Lot#20 Lot#21 Lot#22 r to '11920 SF �, 5< - 26,350 SF Lot#,19K r ___ r ,Lot#23 26 676 SF J 4 2,498 SF .24,879 SF = , r, s 58,936 SF, ;_ 23,000 SF `r 19,950 SF` i ' ., _ , ..• 1,332�SF ,3 2;607 SF" 2 : o t "tr ,;a k 2,450 SF. ' 1;312�SF. - 1,299 SF ` 14.5/0 `3 781 SF 1,159 SF. �a. y. tir u . ,ft . , r y >.. , �. _ *+'3,512 SF ' :i- ,F. '+ i1 o 4 681 SF "' 1:754$F r 2, 4. 10 14.3/° �, 230 SF;, ,. 1,727SF ° `�7T6% �" -11.1% •ti 2,346 SF,ti a 13.2°/0 $`�~ T �; /° _. 6.90/, '7, �r ' 10.9 Lot#16, Lot#17 r` `'�� �" McCabe's Beach 25,74 ' 25,236 (Town of Southold) } r F 1 N/ _ 1 342 SF WAS s 0 1161 • „ f : r f" e w s 1 k c a y r 4 ...,�tS - - :. to s r w. NOTES 1. Site and Proposed Structures digitized from Proposed Site Plan prepared by CMA Group, Subject Property (Site, Note 1) last revised 12/19/2022. Site Plan georeferenced to 2020 orthoimage. ® Proposed Dwelling (Note 1) 2. 500 foot radius obtained using Buffer tool on Site boundary. 3. Parcel within 500' of Site information obtained from Town of Southold records, and includes: D Proposed Development Footprint (Note 1) Lot number, lot size (SF) 500' Radius (Note 2) Dwelling Size (SF) Parcel within 500' of Site (Note 3) Development Footprint (SF, %) 4. Basemap is 2020 orthoimage from NYS GIS Clearinghouse (gis.ny.gov). y Prepared By: Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. Project:EXISTING DEVELOPMENT WITHIN 500' 1 in= 100 ft 570 Expressway Drive South, Suite 2F For: Ed Licalzi LandUseMedford,NY 11763 At: 1925 North Sea Dr., Southold, NY 0 25 50 100 SCTM #1000- 54 -4 -20 ft Date: 2/27/2023 Revised: Scale:As Noted Sheet: RM-1 ' RESOLUTION 2011-68 ADOPTED DOC ID: 6510 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO.2011-68 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON JANUARY 4,2011:, WHEREAS,the Board of Trustees on October 15,2008, denied the application of Robert Bombara(the"Applicant") for a permit to construct a single-family residence on the premises known as 1725 North Sea Drive, Southold,New York,under the Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas Law(the"Law")of the Town of Southold; and WHEREAS,on November 12,2008,Mr. Bombara submitted an application to the Town Board of the Town of Southold, as the governing Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review, seeking to appeal the determination of the Board of Trustees, or in the alternative, seeking a variance from the requirements of the Law,and WHEREAS,the Town Board did transmit a copy of the instant appeal to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation; and WHEREAS,on January 20,2009,February 3,2009, June 2,2009, and September 7,2010,the Town Board conducted duly noticed public hearings on the instant appeal with opportunity for all interested parties to be heard; and WHEREAS,that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby finds that the conditional approval of this application is classified as an Unlisted Action pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations, 6 NYCRR, Section 617; and WHEREAS,the Town of Southold is the only involved agency pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations; and WHEREAS,the Town Board of the Town of Southold accepted the Short Environmental Assessment Form for this action;and WHEREAS,the application has been reviewed pursuant to Chapter 268 (Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program ("LWRP"));now,therefore,be it RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold does hereby adopt the Findings and Determination dated January 4,2011,and conditionally approves the Variance Application of Robert Bombara in accordance with the conditions set forth therein; and be it further 7,41 !!!s Resolution 2011-68 Board Meeting of January 4,2011 RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby finds no significant impact on the environment and declares a negative declaration pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations for this action; and be it further RESOLVED that the Town Board had determined that,with conditions,this action is consistent with the LWRP; and be it further RESOLVED that this Determination shall not affect or deprive any other agency of its properly asserted jurisdiction, separate and apart from the proceedings under the Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas Law considered herein. 0"67.4oe�& Elizabeth A.Neville Southold Town Clerk RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Christopher Talbot, Councilman SECONDER:Louisa P. Evans,Justice AYES: Ruland,Orlando,Talbot,Krupski Jr.,Evans,Russell Updated: 1/3/201110:32 AM by Lynne Krauza. Page 2 TOWN BOARD COASTAL EROSION HAZARD BOARD OF REVIEW TOWN OF SOUTHOLD _------------------------------------------ In the matter of the Application of ROBERT BOMBARA 1725 North Sea Drive DECISION Southold,NY SCTM#1000-54-04-19 -------------------------------------------- FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION Based upon the application, documents contained in the Board's file, site inspections and testimony received at the public hearings held on January 20, 2009, February 3,2009, and June 2,2009 and September 7, 2010,the Town Board finds and determines as follows: ISSUE Applicant has filed an application with the Town Board, as the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review,(the"Board"), dated November 12, 2008, requesting the following relief: 1. A reversal of the Board of Trustees' ("Trustees") October 15, 2008 determination denying the applicant's application for a permit under Chapter 111 Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas of the Town Code, pursuant to the provisions of§111-25. 2. In the alternative, and should the Board affirm the Trustees determination, the applicant has requested a variance of the provisions of Chapter 111 of the Code as provided in §111-20. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY A. Description of the property: The property that is the subject of this application is located on the seaward (north) side of North Sea Drive and is between the Long Island Sound and North Sea Drive. It is approximately 24,979 sq. ft. or .6 acre and is located in the R-40 zone,with approximately 100 ft. of road frontage on North Sea Drive. Unlike many other properties in this area which are developed with single family residences,this lot has never been developed and remains an unspoiled beach area. As confirmed by the Board of Trustees, and acknowledged by the applicant, the property is located entirely within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area("CEHA") as established by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. -1- 7 The applicant who purchased the property in 2006 is proposing to construct a single-family residence on this lot with associated garage, pool,water supply and sewage disposal system on this property. B. Trustees Procedural History: 1. Applications The applicant first appeared before the Trustees with an application filed in October 2006 which requested a CEHA permit allowing the construction of a 4,13 8 sq. ft. 2-story house(5-6 bedrooms),with 484 sq. ft. detached garage and 800 sq. ft. pool entirely within the CEHA. In its determination dated December 13,2006,the Trustees denied the application, without prejudice,on the following grounds: 1. The Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council did not support the application because the development was proposed seaward.of the CEHA and is prohibited under Chapter 111. 2. The LWRP coordinator recommended that the proposal be found inconsistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program as no construction is permitted seaward of the CEHA and that the proposal was inconsistent with policy standard 4.1, 4.2, and 6.3. 3. That the proposal was located entirely within a natural protective(beach) area; 4. That the proposal was located in an environmentally sensitive area containing valuable habitat valued by the Town for nesting areas for threatened and endangered species and for recharge of the aquifer and the proposed construction would negatively impact an environmentally sensitive area. Thereafter and in July 2007,the applicant revised its plans and submitted three "alternative"proposals to the Board of Trustees as follows: ' 1. Alternate 1: 5-6 bedroom house comparable in size to the alternative presented to the Board in 2006, with the garage attached and an 800 sq. ft. pool on the seaward side of the home. 2. Alternate 2: 5-6 bedroom house comparable in size to the alternative presented to the Board in 2006,with the garage attached and an 800 sq. ft. pool on the seaward side of the home(sanitary system and shape of the house is different) 3. Alternate 3: A 5-6 bedroom two-story house(approximately 5,238 sq. ft.) on piles with a 512 sq. ft. pool surrounded by an approximate 30 ft. x 45 ft. brick patio. H. Documentation in the Trustees Record Additionally,the applicant submitted the following materials in support of the application: . U r -2- 1. A report of Dru Associates,Inc. dated October 17,2007 discussing the environmental impacts from the proposal and concluding that the proposed activity complies with the permit issuance standards set forth in 6 N.Y.C.R.R. Part 505,and that the issuance of a permit for development of the property is "compatible with the CEHA and Tidal Wetlands protection, since the resources protected by either of these programs will remain unaltered by the proposed home. 2. A report from First Coastal,dated October 17, 2007, concluding that the section of shoreline upon which this property is located is"dominated by low profile beach ridges that are vegetated by mature shrubs and tree fronted by a sandy beach and(m)akgin of beach grass" 3. An affidavit of John Ehlers, surveyor•attesting that there has been no erosion at the site. 1 4. A coastal assessment report, dated October 2008 and prepared by Applied Coastal Research stating that,overall,net change in shoreline position since 1955 has been approximately zero,which does not mean the shoreline did not move during this time,but suggests that regardless of variation in shoreline movement during this 52-year period,net shoreline location is generally unchanged. The Bombara property is outside the 50-year wave impact zone. The record before the Trustees also contains a memo data October 2,2007 from Environmental Technician,Heather Cusack and attached data regarding piping plover nesting in the area of the property. The memo indicates that the attached data show a nest east of Kenny's Beach in 2004 and a 2005 map shows a nest between Kennys and McCabe's beaches. The memo concludes that given the nesting patterns,the parcel is a piping plover habitat. Additionally;the memo points out that the State Department of State included the stretch of beach east to McCabe's beach in the Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife habitat. The record before the Trustees.also contains a memo discussing the environmental review of the proposal daied September 17, 2007 which indicates that the lot is located in the CEHA and that the natural protective features on site include a beach and primary dune. On April l5, 2008,the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation conducted a site visit to the property wherein the DEC confirmed: "that the landward limit line of the natural protective feature area(a.k.a. the CEHA line)was mapped based on the determination that the primary dune was the most landward natural protective feature. North Sea Drive was built on a portion of this primary dune. During the initial mapping phase which occurred over twenty years ago and was concluded by a public hearing, a decision was made to place the CEHA line along the north edge of North Sea Drive instead of continuing further landward to a point 25 feet from the landward toe." On October 1, 2008,the LWRP Coordinators submitted a written recommendation to the Trustees that the proposed actions were inconsistent with the LWRP standard and that the proposals did not comply with Town Code Chapter 175, Wetlands, and Chapter 111. III. Public Hearing.- The earing:The Trustees held a public hearing on this application on August 22,2007 and on October 15, 2008 at which time all those interested were given the opportunity to speak. Peter Danowski, Esq. appeared on behalf of the applicant and presented information in support of the application,the relevant portions of such information is summarized below. Mr. Danowski,pointed out the differences in Alternatives 1 —3 with a prior application to the Trustees by the same applicant that was denied by the Trustees in 2006. Mr. Danowski also set forth certain information regarding the location of the beach area which was verified by the applicant's engineer,Doug Adams of Young& Young. Mr. Danowski also mentioned that the Trustees had granted coastal erosion permits to other property owners in the community,namely,Paskov, Betsch, Von Zubin, Pearlstein,Rosicki and Sonnenboin; and requested that the records of each of those permit applications be incorporated into the Trustees record by reference. Additionally, several'members of the public and surrounding community testified in opposition to the proposal. Those comments in pertinent part included the following: 1. That the proposal was inconsistent with the LWRP. 2. The Conservation Advisory Committee's refusal to conduct a full review of the proposal because of its location seaward of the coastal erosion hazard line. 3. Trustees should not allow nearby pre-existing construction to legitimize,new construction that is not compliant. 4. The applicant did not make substantive changes to the plan,and therefore should not be considered by the Trustees. At the October 15,2008 hearing,Mr. Danowski, again appeared on behalf of the applicant and presented the testimony of Mark,Bums stating that this particular beach community has experienced accretion as opposed to erosion. Again, several members of the community presented information in opposition to the application including: the'potential iriipacf of the rise in sea level and global climate change on the'storm surge in the area and erosion;the proposal is located in a primary t It is noted that the applicant filed an appeal to the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of the 2006 Trustees determination which was never decided,and is deemed moot by the applicant's submission of an alternate application to the Trustees. -4- - V TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR APPEAL TO THE COASTAL EROSION HAZARD BOARD OF REVIEW DATE "I J��3 NAME OF APPLICANT: MY--"5 ADDRESS: No✓ Z--ev r old DATE OF DECISION APPEALED FROM 12- 2-7-72 '-(FwDe�� mQp, "9 SPECIFIC CHAPTER/SECTION INVOLVED I I ( — 20 -z/ iq/2--Z) THE ALLEGED ERRORS IN THE DETERMINATION ARE: -5.-ee- a*c4ad INTERPRETATION THAT IS CLAIMED TO BE CORRECT: RELIEF SOUGHT: C x C �aO Sc 6 n �?e y aut, 1Q-1 r ozy "nj byc-�h Ley i 6 C-6 lu *COPY OF THE ENTIRE BOARD OF TRUSTEE FILE INCLUDING ANY RELEVANT MAPS MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPEAL RECEIVED S'TMATURE OF APPLICANT JAN 13 2023 Southold Town Clerk SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD In its capacity as the COASTAL EROSION HAZARD BOARD OF REVIEW x In the matter of the Application of MKS Realty LLC 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold, NY SCTM # 1000 •54 •4 •20 x FACTUAL INFORMATION Property and Proposed Action: MKS Realty LLC is the owner of an unimproved property located at 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold. The property is 58, 936 square feet (1 . 3530 acres) in size, located in the Town' s "R-40" zoning district . The owner wishes to improve the property with a single-family residence as shown on a site plan prepared by CMA Group last revised December 1, 2022 which shows a two-story single-family home with a first floor of 2, 401 . 1 square feet; second floor of 2, 219 square feet; front entrance of 498 . 1 square feet; garage under the house of 591 . 6 square feet; first floor deck of 1, 284 square feet; and pool of 448 square feet . The proposed. house includes leaders, gutters, and drywells to capture stormwater from a 2" rainfall event . All undisturbed portions of the site will be permanently maintained as "non-disturbance" buffers, all cleared areas built upon will be restored with native, nonfertilizer dependent vegetation and maintained as a .non- turf buffer, and the structures will be pile construction in compliance with FEMA regulations . See attached Exhibit .A. 1 The subject property and all the waterfront properties along North Sea Drive are situated within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area and are governed by the provisions of Chapter 111 of the Southold Town Code . MKS Realty LLC applied to the Southold Town Trustees on November 18, 2021 for a Coastal Erosion permit under Chapter 111 of the Southold Town Code to construct a single-family dwelling with a deck and swimming pool as shown on the CMA site plan. 2 In the course of Trustee review, the original project plan was significantly redesigned and relocated away from the natural protective 1 features . The proposed action uses the regulatory review of the adjacent "Bombara" parcel as controlling precedent and a "road map" for the proposed action. 3 According to the Bombara decision issued by the Town Board, the parcel is located in a Dune Area and identified by vegetation and topographic features which include the Seaward Dune Toe, the Crest of the Dune/Beach Ridge and the Landward Limit of the Dune/Beach Ridge. The proposed house, deck and pool were redesigned and relocated landward of the landward limit of the Dune /Beach ridge , using the methodology utilized by the Town Board and Trustees on the adjacent parcel . To identify the vegetation and topographic features which include the Seaward Dune Toe, the Crest of the Dune/Beach Ridge and the Landward Limit of the Dune/Beach Ridge on the property the applicant obtained the professional advice of Land .Use Ecological Services, Inc. , Young and Young, land surveyors and engineers, and Doug Adams, professional engineer and geologist . Our experts addressed the environmental issues identified in Bombara' s parcel and incorporated into the design appropriate mitigation for potential adverse impacts on natural systems and their functions . The revised project presented to the Trustees adopted the recommendations made by the Town Board and Trustees for the adjacent property as well as other properties on North Sea Drive . 'Exhibit A consists of the following: Proposed Site Plan prepared by CMA Group, Native Planting Plan prepared by Land Use Ecological Services Inc. , Building Permit survey prepared by Young & Young last dated December 2, 2022 and Project Narrative prepared by Land Use Ecological Services Inc. , dated December 6, 2022 . 2 An application for a Wetlands permit was also submitted to the Town Trustees under the provisions of Town Code chapter 275. 3 In the matter of the Application of Robert Bombara, 1725 North Sea Drive, Southold, New York SCTM 1000-54-04-19 attached as Exhibit B. 2 Town Trustee Decision: In a decision dated December 27, 2022, the Trustees denied the application under Chapter 111 because the subject property is in a "primary dune area . "4 APPEAL TO COASTAL EROSION BOARD The Coastal Erosion Hazard Area law authorizes the Coastal Erosion Board to grant variance relief from the standards of Chapter 111 . [Town Code §111 .241 The law recognizes that "strict application of the standards and restrictions of this chapter may cause practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship" Id. The standards and restrictions may be varied or modified if certain criteria are met . These criteria are set forth in Town Code §111-20 : A. No reasonable, prudent, alternative site is available . B. All responsible means and measures to mitigate adverse impacts on natural systems and their functions and values have been incorporated into the activity' s design at the property owner' s expense . C. The development will be reasonably safe from flood and erosion damage . D. The variance requested is the minimum necessary to overcome the practical difficulty or hardship which was the basis for the requested variance . E. Where public funds are utilized, the public benefit must clearly outweigh the long • term effects . 1. Practical Difficulty / Unnecessary Hardship The subject property is 58 , 936 square feet in size and 200 feet wide along North Sea Drive . T h e entire property is seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Line established by the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation which line runs in an east -west direction along North Sea Drive . 4 In its decision, the Trustees denied the requested Wetlands permit as applied for under chapter 275 . That separate decision is not the subject of this variance appeal . 3 The provisions of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Law have created a practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship for the owner. 2. Variance Criteria The Coastal Erosion Board [Town Board] may grant a variance from the provisions of Chapter 111 if certain conditions are satisfied: A. No reasonable, prudent, alternative site is available . The applicant owns no other property within the Town of Southold upon which to construct the proposed single- family home . And there is no other location on the subject property itself which is more environmentally suitable than where the proposed home is to be situated. The site plan prepared by CMA Group and the Native Planting Plan prepared by Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. , both dated December 1, 2022, identify the location of the seaward edge of beach grass, seaward dune toe, the crest of the Dune/Beach Ridge, and the landward limit of the Dune/Beach Ridge crest . The proposed structures are all situated landward of the landward Dune/Beach Ridge, thereby assuring the continued integrity of this natural feature . The most seaward portion of the proposed improvements are situated landward of an extended line from the improvements constructed on the abutting similar properties located to the east and west respectively of the subject property. All improvements including the house, deck and swimming pool are thus kept clear of the dune and landward of the landward dune/beach ridge . 5 5 The Town Trustees utilized a "pier line" analysis as it considered the proposed improvements . The pier line provisions of the Town Code, as defined in Town Code chapter 275, which states "the average seaward projection of one or more existing permitted docks, piers, wharves or floats" are not applicable to these upland structures . 4 B. All responsible means and measures to mitigate adverse impacts on natural systems and their functions and values have been incorporated into the activity' s design at the property owner ' s expense . Natural systems on and near the subject property include a beach and dune system, as well as littoral zone (i . e . un-vegetated) wetlands within Long Island Sound. This beach and dune system provides protection for the community from flooding and erosion. Both elements - the dune and beach berm - are needed to provide protection to upland areas . A healthy beach berm, in height and width, is more valuable for storm protection than a dune, when taken separately. Beach berms are the first line of defense against waves, where a sufficiently high and wide beach berm absorbs wave energy and storm surge, thereby protecting dunes and upland community areas . Dunes are the last line of defense protecting upland areas from waves and provide a source of sand to allow adjustment of the beach berm profile to facilitate dissipation of wave energy during a storm. The beach and dune system along North Sea Drive is stable . As discussed in the Project Narrative submitted to the Trustees on December 1, 2022, aerial photographs were utilized to digitize the dry beach in 1957, 1971, 1994, 2013 (post-Sandy) , and 2020 . As demonstrated by aerials going back 65 years, the beach is stable, with fluctuations of 5-15 feet between 1957 and 1994 . The beach was at its narrowest in 2013, following Superstorm Sandy in October 2012, and has accreted 40-65 feet in the vicinity of the subject property since 2013 . Based on 2020 aerials and the site survey, the dry beach area is currently at its widest since 1957 . In addition to the dry shoreline, the general limit of dune vegetation was digitized from aerial photographs in 1957, 1971, 1994, 2013, and 2020 . The vegetated dune has expanded seaward (i . e . , north) 50-57 feet at the subject property since -1957 . Like the dry shoreline, the vegetated dune is currently at its widest/most seaward since 1957 . Based on this analysis, the natural protective beach 5 and dune system at 1925 North Sea Drive is stable, with no significant coastal erosion occurring in the past 65. years for which analysis was performed. North Sea Drive has undergone residential development along its length during this time; this pattern of residential development has not adversely affected the beach and dune system, as evidenced by the analysis performed and discussed above . The proposed action has been the subject of Town Trustee review which led to reconfiguration and relocation of the proposed structures as far landward as possible to maximize wetland and dune setbacks, and to maximize preservation of natural habitat . The proposed action as submitted December 1, 2022, includes maintaining the existing beach in its entirety, and maintaining approximately 23, 100 square feet ( 100+ feet wide) of the existing vegetated dune, for an approximately 200-foot- wide buffer of beach and dune habitat . This area will be preserved through establishment of a variable width natural and undisturbed buffer seaward of the development activities [except for a 4 •foot •wide path for beach access proposed in an area of an existing wildlife trail with minimal vegetation] . Supplementing the preserved areas, an additional 3, 900 square feet of planted buffer consisting of native woody and herbaceous species is proposed for disturbed areas around the perimeter of the site; and an additional 3, 500 square feet of planted buffer consisting of herbaceous vegetation is proposed for the disturbed areas around the house and over the sanitary system. This is all depicted on the "Native Planting Plan" and the Project Narrative included as Exhibit A. The proposed house and proposed deck are designed to maximize setbacks to the tidal wetland boundary at mean high water of Long Island Sound (213+ feet) , the beach ( 100+ feet) , the Dune/Beach Crest (35+ feet) and the landward limit of the Dune/Beach Ridge (3+ feet) . Structures are proposed on piles and elevated to meet current FEMA requirements and have been designed in accordance with standards of construction in coastal hazard areas . Maximizing setbacks and preserving most of the natural protective beach and dune system mitigates potential adverse impacts to the system. Further, as discussed in the beach and dune analysis paragraphs above, the pattern 6 of residential development along North Sea Drive since 1957 has not adversely impacted the natural beach and dune system, both of which have accreted and expanded even with residential development like this proposed project . Additional measures incorporated into the design, for protection of natural features and water quality, include use of an innovative/alternative wastewater treatment system (I/A OWTS) , installation of a stormwater management system for storage and treatment of runoff from a 2" rainfall event, and use of erosion and sediment control practices during construction. The Trustees asked that the applicant maintain the "pier line" which was done. Notwithstanding the misapplication of the wetland ordinance , a line was drawn from the seaward point of the a d j a c e n t house, as a form of waterfront setback, west to the seaward point of the adjacent house east, and a line was drawn from the seaward point of the deck to the west to the deck to the east. Notably , this "pier line" was not applied in either the Bombara application or to other homes on North Sea Drive, such as the Betsch application at 2325 North Sea Drive and approved on November 16, 2004 . In both Bombara and Betsch, the Coastal Erosion Law appeals used the landward limit of the Dune/Beach Ridge as the determinative line for development and not the "pier line" . C. The development will be reasonably safe from flood and erosion damage. The subject property is adjacent to Long Island Sound and within VE El . 13 and AE E1 . 12 flood zones as designated by FEMA on Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) #36103C0154H, effective 9/25/2009 . All structures are proposed a minimum of 213 feet landward of MHW associated with Long Island Sound, and landward of the landward dune/beach ridge, preserving and protecting the natural protection beach and dune system as discussed above. Structures are as far landward as possible while maintaining the average front yard setback of 38 . 8 feet for North Sea Drive . This is consistent with the determination made by the Town Board in its prior decision 7 granting a Chapter 111 variance to the adjoining property located west of the subject property (See Bombara) . In addition to the setback from Long Island Sound and the natural protective beach and dune system, all structures will be designed and certified by a professional engineer to be in conformance with the FEMA- referenced American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Flood Resistant Design and Construction 2014 standards (ASCE 24-14 ) . ASCE 24-14 is a referenced standard in the International Building Code and the NYS Building Code, developed to minimize potential for flood and erosion damage to structures proposed in coastal areas, with specific standards for structures proposed in Coastal High Hazard Areas such as the subject property. In Bombara, the Town Board determined that FEMA compliant construction and placing the structures as far from the Long Island Sound as feasible met the standards that the development will be reasonably safe from flood and erosion damage and approved the CEHA variance . D. The variance requested is the minimum necessary to overcome the practical difficulty or hardship which was the basis for the requested variance. The plans for the proposed single-family home, deck and swimming pool have undergone several revisions after review by the Town Trustees . The structures will be in line wit h existing development east and west aka "pier line" , landward of the landward Dune/Beach Ridge, and located along the established average front yard of the abutting properties to the east and west. The size of the home is consistent with the community in which it is located, 67 . 4 % of the property will be preserved in its natural state , and 12 . 6 % of the property will be planted with native vegetation to establish a natural buffer . In a review of the size of the homes along North Sea Drive, the applicant is proposing a footprint which is comparable to the existing homes along the north side of the roadway. When considered in terms of lot size , the subject property is the largest waterfront parcel on North Sea Drive at 58, 936 square feet . In 8 comparison, there were two new homes constructed along the seaward side of North Sea Drive . The most recent being the Bombara waterfront lot, which is 24 , 879 square feet, with a footprint of 1, 733 square feet . The Betsch property was improved with a very small one-story ranch. More than 500 of the Betsch house was reconstructed and today would be considered "demolition and new construction" . The Betsch waterfront lot is 26, 677 square feet, with a footprint of 4, 443 square feet . The proposed house on a lot that is more than twice the size of Bombara and Betsch is proportional to the size of the property. Moreover, the proposed development maintains the Bombara seaward limit of development while also maintaining the average front yard setback from North Sea Drive . As discussed above, current project design incorporates the preservation and planting of 80 . 0o of the site. Approximately 39, 700 square feet of the property (67 . 40) will be maintained in its natural state as beach and vegetated dune habitat, and an additional 7, 400 square feet of the property (12 . 60) will be vegetated with native herbaceous and shrub species after construction. Refer to the Native Planting Plan for details . Potential impacts and the following mitigation measures are proposed to reduce impacts : A The area proposed to be preserved is three (3) times the size of the area preserved on the Bombara parcel, and any other parcel on the seaward side of North Sea Drive . The proposed project leaves undisturbed 39, 700 square feet of natural beach and dune habitat . Disturbed areas will be restored with native plantings, an additional 12 . 60 of the property. There will be no lawn. B. Installation of an I/A OWTS to reduce nitrogen loading to groundwater and surface waters is proposed as required. No other home on North Sea Drive was required to be built with this system. C. Installation of a stormwater management system to treat and store runoff from, a 2" rainfall event, prior to discharge to Long Island Sound. It should be noted 9 that the ±100-foot-wide buffer will also act to filter runoff prior to discharge into Long Island Sound, for storm events exceeding the 2" design. D. Construction design standards comply with FEMA Flood Resistant Design & Construction standards and New York State Building Code to protect against flood and erosion damage . E. Development will not interfere with nesting shorebirds in that all activity is greater than 100 feet landward of their beach nesting habitat, and development is separated from shorebird nesting habitat by the naturally vegetated buffer that will be preserved. F. The function of the beach and dune system as a protective feature is preserved by the above-listed mitigation measures . E. Where public funds are utilized, the public benefit must clearly outweigh the long-term effects . No public funds are being utilized. This criterion does not apply. CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth in this Petition and the accompanying documents submitted, it is respectfully requested that the Town Board in its capacity as the Coastal Erosion Board, grant a variance from the provisions of Chapter 111 of the Southold Town Code and direct the Town Trustees to issue a Coastal Erosion Permit . It is further requested that the grant of the variance as requested be deemed consistent with the provisions of the LWRP pursuant to Chapter 268 of the Southold Town Code . 10 January 13, 2023 /. ricia c . Moore, Attorney for Appellants 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 631-765-4330 dune area on a rare virgin beach; and there are endangered species and rare wetlands located on the property. IV. Trustees.Determination, On October 15,2008, the Trustees issued a determination denying the Applicant's request(for all three alternatives)for a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Permit based upon the following: 1. The Conservation Advisory Counsel provided comment that the location of the Coastal Erosion Hazard line is landward of all proposed activities, and, as such, a full review of the application could not be conducted. 2. The LWRP Coordinator recommended that the application be found inconsistent with the LWRP because the proposal was inconsistent with Policy 4.1,4.2, 6, and 6.3. 3. The Board conducted a site visit with the LWRP coordinator, and the New York State Department of Environmental Specialist Robert McDonough, which confirmed that the proposed actions were entirely located seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard line and within a primary dune and a primary dune is a natural protective feature 4. The proposed structures, as applied for, are located on the natural protective feature of a primary dune and governed by §111-13 which prohibits all activities in such areas. C. The Town Board proceeding On November 12, 2008,the Applicant timely filed an appeal of the Trustee's determination pursuant to Town Code 111-25 and in the alternative seeking a variance from the standards set forth in the Code with the'Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review(the Board). The Board held duly noticed public hearings on January 20, 2009, February 3, 2009, June 2, 2009 and September 7, 2010 at which time all interested parties were.given the opportunity to present testimony on the application. Peter Danowski, Esq., appeared on behalf of the applicant and presented testimony on both the appeal and variance request. The testimony presented on the appeal reiterated the information provided to the Trustees as set forth in Section III above. With respect to the variance application, Mr. Danowski requested that the Board consider the purpose of Coastal Erosion Hazard Law, i.e. to protect property owners from erosion in conjunction with the expert reports entered into the record indicating that this sound front community has accreted. Additionally, Mr. Danowski also incorrectly noted that the Town is required,to update the Coastal Erosion Map every 10 years which it has not done.Z 2 The Town does not have the authority nor the jurisdiction to change the Coastal Erosion Hazard Map. Pursuant to Chapter 111,the Town must follow the map as established by the NYS DEC. -5- Aram Terchunian,a coastal geologist, also testified for the applicant that the there is no documented evidence of sea level rise in this area and, as such, it should not be considered by the Board. Mr. Terchunian also testified that applicant meets all the criteria for a variance,that the area where the applicant's property is located is dominated by a series of beach ridges that have been deposited over decades and centuries and that granting a variance will not destabilize the dune system. Members of the community also provided testimony in opposition to proposal including: 1. Requests that the Town Board take into account the rising sea level and that the coastal erosion hazard line may be moved further inland in the future. 2. The existence of homes in the area, does not provide a sound basis for granting an approval. 3. A primary dune is a dynamic system and is a natural protective feature under the Town Code. 4. The approval of this proposal with set a precedent for the undeveloped lots in the area. 5. Further construction within the maritime freshwater inter-dunal swale that exists between Goldsmith Inlet and Hortons Point weakens the structure of the land and, as happened in East Hampton, could cause houses to go into the water. On April 3, 2009 the Applicant submitted additional material into the record, though the record was closed, and requested that a decision be issued. As the record was re-opened by the Town Board as discussed below,the content of this letter and its attachment were permitted to enter the record. Attached to this letter was a report of Dru Associates, Inc., Ecological Consultants,which purportedly addressed the public comments. Most notably,Dru Associates March 17,2009 report acknowledged the presence of natural protective features on site and generally stated,without any support or indication of where the features were located that the function of the natural protective features would not be altered. Upon review of the record and prior to issuing a determination,the Town Board on April 21,2009,noted certain deficiencies in the record with respect to the application and determined to re-open the public hearing,to permit the additional materials submitted by the applicant on April 3,2009 and to enlist the services of En-Consultants, Inc., Robert E. Herrmann, Coastal Management Specialist("Herrmann")to evaluate potential impacts of construction on erosion trends and on the natural protective features on the property. More specifically,the Town Board requested additional information with respect to whether the proposed construction was located within a natural protective feature,whether any construction could be located outside the natural protective feature; what impacts the proposed and/or any construction might have on erosion trends and the site's.natural protective feature and its functions and protective values; and whether and how(i.e. via location, scope design, etc.)those impacts could be avoided or minimized. -6- On June 2, 2009,the Town Board re-opened the public hearing and the record to address the above issues that were not adequately addressed at the January 20, 2009, February 3, 2009 public hearings. A letter from the applicant's representative dated May 29, 2010 was accepted into the record and noted that the applicant objected to the Town Board's reopening of the hearing. Additionally,a recommendation from Herrmann dated, April 20, 2009 was entered into the record which noted a critical deficiency in the record, most notably that the applicant's site plan did not depict the most landward natural protective feature on the site and therefore, that the Town Board could not ascertain the impacts of the proposed construction on the primary dune. Once the landward geomorphic toe and landward regulatory limit of the sand ridge/primary dune was identified, Herrmann could address the questions identified by the Board. At the June 2, 2009 meeting the Board directed that deficiencies in the applicant's plan noted by Herrmann be addressed by the applicant. Thereafter,the applicants' representatives and/or technical consultants met at the property on several occasions with the Town's'representative and/or technical consultant to discuss the location landward toe of the natural protective feature. Based upon the agreement between the applicant's consultant and Herrmann of the location of the landward toe of the natural protective feature,the applicant made significant revisions to its plans and, as requested by the Town Board, submitted a an amended application to the Board on July 15,2010, indicated on the Plan as "Alternate 6." This alternative was for an approximately 1700 sq. ft. (footprint) single-family dwelling on pilings with pool, deck, garage and septic system,with a certain portion of the proposed construction occurring over the landward toe of the natural protective feature indicated on the plan. The revised plan was forwarded to Herrmann and a public hearing was duly noticed and scheduled for September 7, 2010. On August 30,2010,the Town Board received a report from its consultant with the following recommendations on the Alternate 6 plan submitted by the applicant on July 16'h: 1. At a minimum any development should be limited in scope and situated so as to avoid,all physical encroachment on and- disturbance to the geomorphic limits of the primary dune, both during construction and,afterward to avoid displacement and/or degradation of the primary dune and that all construction should be conducted 8-10 feet from the landward toe of the primary dune. 2. The applicant could relocate and/or downsize the proposed structures and incorporate additional mitigation measures to avoid degradation of the primary dune and therefore the proposal failed to meet the standards for a variance set forth in §111-20. 3. Impacts to natural resources could be mitigated with the installation of leaders, gutters and drywells. 4. Limit removal of natural vegetation and wildlife habitat and the potential introduction of fertilizers by requiring that all undisturbed -7- portions of the site be permanently maintained as a nondisturbance buffer;requiring that all cleared areas no built upon be restored with native,nonfertilizer-dependent vegetation and maintained as a landscape buffer and prohibiting the use of the such chemicals on the site 5. Additional revisions to the site plan presented by the applicant including the identification of the CEHA boundary; the depiction of the regulatory landward limit of the most landward natural protective feature;verification/update of the FEMA boundaries; depiction of a project limiting fence and staked hay bales along the proposed limits of clearing, grading and ground disturbance. On September 7, 2010,the public hearing on this matter was continued and all interested parties were given the opportunity to speak. Mr. Danowski appeared on behalf of the applicants with certain consultants to address the items raised in the Herrmann report,most notably: 1. That contrary to what was suggested by Herrmann, the County Health Department has the same septic system size requirements for two,three or four bedroom homes and their for downsizing the home would not decrease the size of the septic system and would not allow the applicant to move the home closer to the road. 2. The applicant has proposed a:house on piles and a cantilevered deck to avoid heavy equipment on the primary dune and so that there would be no intrusive building of structures within the primary dune area. 3. Mr. Herrmann's report confirmed that there has been no long term erosion on the property. Members of the public again appeared in opposition to the application and reiterated arguments that were made at the prior hearings. The Town Board closed the hearing subject to comment by the applicant on Mr. Herrmann's report and reserving the Town's right to respond. The applicant submitted a response to the Herrmann report by letter dated September 21, 2010 which set forth the following: 1. There was no reasonable alternative site for the applicant to construct a single family dwelling and urging the Board not require that the location of the house be moved so that a variance would be required by the Zoning Board of Appeals, since the Zoning Board had denied a prior variance application to an adjacent homeowner. Additionally,the area beptweeri the proposed structure and the road is necessary-to accommodate the installation of a septic system and to provide parking for cars. The applicant also corrected an error in the record,the septic'system proposed is for a 3 bedroom house. -8- 2. The applicant offered to plant supplemental native vegetation to further protect the beach area. The applicant also agreed to erect and maintain a silt fence/hay bale construction barrier to protect the area seaward of the piling foundation. The applicant would also consent to a condition that no mechanical equipment would be allowed seaward of the piling foundation area during the construction activity. The applicant would also be willing to plant vegetation under the cantilevered deck. 3. The applicant is willing to limit the introduction of fertilizer and other contaminates and will supplement existing seaward vegetation. No clearing will be performed seaward of the construction area. 4. There is no need for approximately 8-10 feet of width on the seaward side of the structures to protect the dune. 5. The applicant also agreed to install leaders gutters and dry wells; to a condition that would require that the undisturbed portion of the site be permanently maintained as a nondisturbance buffer; a requirement that all cleared areas not built upon be restored with native,non-fertilizer-dependent vegetation and maintained as a landscape buffer; and prohibiting the use of such chemicals on the site. 6. The applicant also submitted a revised survey, dated September 21, 2010 with the changes requested in the Herrmann report. On October 4,2010,the Board received a letter from Herrmann that confirmed that all changes requested in the August 30, 2010 report had been made by the applicant; that the applicant's consultant had confirmed that grading restrictions mandated by the County Health Department would prevent the sanitary system from being moved closer to the road and that if the proposed development was going to be moved farther from the primary dune without zoning relief,that the applicant would have to decrease or redesign the structural footprint. Herrmann also notes that the applicant failed to provide any engineering plan and/or construction narrative prepared by a licensed professional to demonstrate and certify how the proposed structures could be installed without breaching the clearing limitation and damaging the dune. No other comments were received and the record was closed on October 5, 2010. Thereafter and on November 12, 2010,the Applicant requested that the record be re-opened for the submission of a fetter to the Board dated October 13,2010 regarding certain County Health Department Regulations and a letter from Elderco, Inc., a contractor from Port Jefferson indicating the sequence of construction and how said construction sequence would protect the dune. On November 30,2010,the Town Board,by Resolution No. 2010-942,re-opened the record for thirty days for the limited purpose of permitting the additional information requested by the Applicant to be entered into the record and considered by this Board and allowing sufficient time for comments responding to the additional information supplied by the Applicant. On December 7, 2010, the Town Board forwarded the additional materials submitted by the Applicant to the Town Engineer and Chief Building Inspector for review and comment. By letter dated December 8,2010, the Town Engineer submitted a response for the record reiterating the recommendation of Herrmann that a minimum setback between eight(8')and ten(10')feet from the landward toe of the dune, despite the proposed construction sequence in the November 8, 2010 letter from Elderco, Inc. The Town Engineer also suggested that the setback include the proposed pool and patio areas and/or any other site improvement that will be constructed with and/or supported by the ground. Finally,the Town Engineer also noted that the proposed cantilevered framing will create the need to access the end of deck framing, the construction of which will ultimately reach out and adversely affect the dune and recommends that all cantilevered construction be limited so that it does not extend over or beyond the designated toe of the dune. On December 28, 2010,the Town Board received a letter from the Kenney's/McCabe's Beach Civic Association stating that the Elderco, Inc. letter submitted by the Applicant that questioned whether said letter would qualify as the requested engineering plan and construction narrative recommended in the October 4, 2010 Herrmann letter,and noting certain alleged errors in the letter. This letter also points out that the content of the Elderco, Inc. letter is so general that it could apply to any building site and that there is no documentation provided by the Applicant to confirm that Elderco, Inc. will perform the proposed work on site. On December 2010,the record of the proceeding was closed. APPEAL OF THE TRUSTEE'S DETERMINATION The Town Board confirms the determination of the Trustee's decision denying the application for a coastal erosion hazard permit with certain modifications for the reasons set forth below. The CEHA program sets forth a series of regulated activities that require a coastal erosion hazard permits if such activities are conducted within the CEHA. Regulated activities are defined in §111-6 as: The construction, modification, restoration or placement of a structure, or major addition to a structure, or any action or use of land which materially alters the condition of land, including grading, excavating, dumping, mining, dredging,filling or other disturbance of soil. -10- The construction of a new dwelling, without question, qualifies as a regulated activity. Furthermore,there is no dispute that all proposed activity involved in this application occurs within a designated CEHA and is.seaward of the coastal erosion hazard line. As such,contrary to the applicant's argument that he should not have been required to file an application for a coastal erosion management permit because the project activity is all located beyond 100 feet from the Town defined"beach" area,the applicant was clearly required by the Town Code to obtain a Coastal Erosion Hazard Permit prior to commencing construction on the site. Article II of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Chapter of the Town Code sets forth the regulations that apply within coastal erosion areas and requires a permit for regulated activities in §111-8. Section 111-8 is followed by specific criteria for the issuance of a permit in §111-9. Article II also sets forth additional regulations that apply in specific areas of sensitivity(structural hazard area(§111-10), near shore area(§111-11), beach area(§111-12), dune area(§111-13), and bluff area(§111-14)). If a proposal is located within a specific area of sensitivity,these additional regulations and prohibitions apply. In this instance,the Board of Trustees properly identified the portion of the property impacted by the construction of proposed single family dwelling as entirely within a primary dune area.3 This finding was supported by a letter submitted by the Department of Environmental Conservation to the Trustees stating the following: . . . the landward limit line of the natural protective feature area (a.k.a. CEHA line) was mapped based on the determination that the primary dune was the most landward natural protective feature. As such,the State had drawn the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line based upon the presence of a primary dune. There was no evidence in the record before the Trustees indicating anything to,the contrary. The applicant's expert reports also note that the area of the property closest to North Sea Drive contains sand ridges(which qualify as dunes under §111-6). Section 111-13(A) of the Town Code sets forth permitted and prohibited actions in primary dune areas: 1. Excavating, grading, or mining of primary dunes is prohibited. 2. Clean sand of a compatible type and size is the only material which may be deposited. Any deposition requires a coastal erosion management permit. , 3 It is noted that the applicant argues in its letter of November 12,2008,that since this area is not located within a beach area,that the Trustees did not have jurisdiction. While the applicant may be correct with respect to the Iocation of the proposed construction in relation to the location of the beach area,the applicant failed to address the Trustee's finding that the proposed construction was within a primary dune area and therefore prohibited under§111-13(C). -11- 3. All depositions must be vegetatively stabilized using species tolerant of the conditions at the site and must be placed so as to increase the size of, or restore, a dune or dune are. 4. Active bird nesting and breeding areas must not be disturbed, unless such disturbance is pursuant to a specific wildlife management activity approved, in writing, by the Department. S, Nonmajor additions to existing structures are allowed on primary dunes pursuant to a coastal erosion management permit and subject to permit conditions concerning the location, design and potential impacts of the structure on the primary dune. 6. Stone revetments or other erosion protection structures compatible with primary dunes will only be allowed at the waterward toe of primary dunes and must not interfere with the exchange of sand between primary dunes and their fronting beaches. Section 111-13(C)further states that"[a]ll other activities and developments in dune areas are prohibited unless specifically provided for by this chapter." The construction of a new single family residence does not fall within the activities that are permitted in a primary dune area under §111-13(A). Therefore, as determined by the Board of Trustees,the proposal qualifies as"other activities and developments" and is prohibited under §111-13(C). Based on the foregoing,the Town Board affirms the determination by the Trustees. While the applicant argues that the Trustees have granted applications for Coastal Erosion Hazard Area permits to similar applications,the Trustees correctly distinguished these prior approvals in that each application involved land that was already developed and not vacant land, as is the case in this application: 1. Pearlstein was granted a CEM permit for a 432 s.f. addition to an existing single family residence, an addition to be constructed on pilings above base flood elevation. No primary dune was identified on the property. 2. Von Zuben was granted a CEM permit for a renovation of an existing single family dwelling,placement of the house on pilings, construction of a new deck,replacement of a sanitary system, removal of concrete walls on property lines, and the construction of a new gravel driveway. Construction was not proposed on an identified primary dune. 3. Rosicki was granted a CEM permit for the construction of a proposed addition and alteration to an existing family residence including a deck and sanitary system. 4. Betsch—was denied a CEM permit initially and was granted a CEM permit only after obtaining a variance from the Town Board. The CEM permit was for the construction of a new single family dwelling and garage, in place of an existing dwelling,to be built on pilings with conditions. . -12- 5. Paskoff was granted a CEM permit to replace a burned out existing structure with a new single family residence with pool. No primary dune was identified where construction was proposed. 6. Litner was required to obtain only a building permit as the additions to the existing home did not constitute a major addition under Chapter 111 7. Sonnenborn received building permits for their home in 1989, prior to the enactment of Chapter 111. Furthermore,the applicant argued and presented information to the Trustees that the property and surrounding area had not experienced erosion and that the area had experienced accretion. This information was irrelevant to the Trustees consideration under Chapter 111. In this instance, once the primary dune area was identified, the Trustees had no authority to consider rates of erosion. The applicant could have used such information before this board to argue its entitlement to a variance and/or to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, the entity having authority to move the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line. The applicant also notes that four alternate plans were submitted and considered by the Trustees,however, each of these plans proposed construction that was prohibited in a primary dune area under §111-13(C). As such, the fact that the applicant submitted alternate plans that downsized the building is irrelevant and could not have been considered by the Trustees. For the reasons set forth above, the Town Board affirms the determination of the Trustees denying the applicant's request for a CEM permit. RELIEF FROM CHAPTER 111 A. Standard for Variance Relief. In the alternative to seeking a reversal of the Trustee's denial of a coastal erosion hazard permit,the applicant has,requested variance relief from the standards of Chapter 111 pursuant to §111-20. In permitting the Board to grant such relief, the Town has recognized that the"strict application of the standards and restrictions of this chapter may cause practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship." This section goes on to list those criteria that an applicant has the burden of establishing that this Board must consider when contemplating the grant of a variance from the strict application Chapter 111: A. No reasonable,prudent, alternative site is available. B. All responsible means and measures to mitigate adverse impacts on natural systems and their functions and values have been incorporated into the activity's design ant the property owner's expense. C. The development will be reasonably safe from flood and erosion damage. -13- D. The variance requested is.the minimum necessary to overcome the practical difficulty or hardship which was the basis for the requested variance. E. Where public funds are utilized, the public benefits must clearly outweigh the long-term adverse effects. B.Location of the Priniga Dune and Finding of Unnecessary Hardship Prior to proceeding with a determination as to whether or how regulated activities could be conducted on the applicant's property pursuant to §111-20,this Board determined that it would be necessary to identify and locate on the site plan the property's most landward natural protective feature and its landward limit. As noted above,the consultant reports submitted by the applicant refer to the presence of"beach ridges"or"sand ridges" on the property which were readily observed by Herrmann. Section 111-6 defines a dune as a"ridge or hill of loose,windblown or artificially placed earth,the principal component of which is sand." Additionally, §111-6 defines a "primary dune"as the most waterward major dune where there arc two or more parallel dunes"or any dune"where there is only one dune present." According to Herrmann's August 25, 2010 report, which is hereby adopted by the Town Board,the beach ridge identified by the'applicant's experts qualifies as a primary dune under §111-6 and, as such, constitutes a natural protective feature. The landward regulatory limit of the primary dune occurs 25 feet landward of the landward toe of the dune identified on the property, as set forth in the definition of a"primary dune"in §111- 6. As discussed in greater detail in the above section, entitled"Appeal of the Trustees' Determination,"new construction is prohibited within a primary dune area(and, by definition,25 ft. from the landward toe of the primary dune itself) and since the proposed construction in alternatives 1-6 as presented by the applicant would have situated new structures within the primary dune area,the applicant could not meet the standards set forth in §111-9. Since the 44 to 54-foot wide area between the road and the regulatory limit of the primary dune is arguably insufficient area to place even a minimally sized dwelling a reasonable distance from North Sea Drive,this Board concludes that the strict application of the standards and restrictions of Chapter 111 has created a practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship for the applicant. C. Analysis of Variance Criteria Pursuant to §111-20 the applicant,had the burden of establishing that he has satisfied each of the criteria listed,therein. As set forth in further detail below, the applicant can satisfy each of the criteria, if certain conditions are met: 1. No reasonable,prudent, alternative site-is available. -14- The application generally states that there is no reasonable,prudent alternative site because the applicant does not own other property within the Town. However,this standard also requires the applicant to consider alternative locations for the proposed structure on property at issue in this appeal. According to the Herrmann report, should the Town permit the site to be developed the reasonable and prudent location for the proposed structures would be entirely landward of and as far behind the identified geologic primary dune as possible because the,dune, which was described by the applicant's consultant(Mr. Terchunian)as "typically very stable" and"dominated by mature vegetation",provides whatever natural protection a dwelling can have on this site. Alternate 6 does propose to locate the proposed structures predominately behind the "landward toe of the most landward beach ridge" as depicted on the applicant's site plan, however,the structures would be located physically adjacent to the beach ridge and the cantilevered deck would extend directly over it. As concluded by Herrmann and the Town Engineer, if the integrity of the beach ridge were compromised or undermined whether during or after construction, a reasonable, prudent,alternative site that situates the proposed structures further from the landward toe of the most landward beach ridge/primary dune is available on the site. The Board finds that there is an alternative location on this property to construct a home that will adequately protect the natural protective feature. The applicant can place all structures 8 feet from the landward toe of the primary dune. 2. All responsible means and measures to mitigate adverse impacts on natural systems and their functions and values have been incorporated into the activity's design at the property owners' expense. The applicant argues that Alternate 6,which proposes a house on pilings and a cantilevered deck, adequately mitigates potential adverse impacts within the primary dune area. As noted in the Herrmann report,placing the house on pilings is a requirement of FEMA,the federal regulatory program that protects the proposed structure from potential flood and erosion damage and has nothing to do with the protection of or mitigating impacts to the primary dune area identified on the plan. The July 15, 2010 application(Alternative 6) did not include a discussion of environmental impacts, including potential for causing increased erosion at the site and at adjacent locations; potential impacts on natural protective features and their function and value; and potential impacts on natural resources. In this instance,the most significant need for mitigation is that required to physically protect and preserve the primary dune by preventing its physical displacement or degradation both during and after construction (Herrmann report p. 3). While the applicant agreed to place a project limiting fence at the landward toe of the primary dune, a fence could not be maintained at that location during construction of the current proposal because the swimming pool, deck and southwest portion of the dwelling are proposed physically adjacent to and/or over the dune and,the excavation for and the installation of those structures and their foundations would necessitate workers, equipment and machinery accessing the seawrd side during construction(Herrmann -15= 4 report page 4). This would ultimately breach the proposed clearing limitation line and would disturb the primary dune. Additionally, after construction there may be loss of vegetation that could result from direct shading by the cantilevered deck that would extend directly over the primary dune (Id.). The Applicant has submitted a letter written by Michael Burner,President of Elderco, Inc., concluding that the proposed construction could be accomplished without damaging the dune and stating that no machinery will be required in the dune area south of the proposed fencing on the landward toe of the dune. However,the Town Engineer, despite review of the statements made in the Elderco, Inc. letter, has reiterated the recommendation of Herrmann that the construction and cantilevered deck and pool be set back a minimum of 8' to 10' from the landward toe of the dune to adequately protect the integrity of the dune to provide a minimal buffer area around new construction and provide access to the new construction without the need for encroachment into the dune area. Further,the Town Engineer has opined that the cantilevered style of framing will create the need to access the end of deck framing. This Board also notes that the Applicant has not submitted any engineering plans to document and illustrate that the general statements made in the Elderco, Inc. letter are possible on this particular site. As such,the Board agrees with both Herrmann and the Town Engineer that the shading of the dune area will negatively affect the health of the dune system and that the construction process will ultimately reach out and negatively affect the dune area. The Herrmann report also identifies potential impacts on natural resources that include, but are not limited to the permanent removal of certain areas of natural vegetation; increase in runoff due to displacement of pervious sand soils with structures and impervious surfaces and the potential for introduction of fertilizers and other contaminants. To deal with these potential impacts the Town will require, and the applicant has agreed to take the following measures: L Erect a project-limiting fence and staked hay bales along the proposed limit of clearing, grading, and ground disturbance prior to the commencement of construction and maintained until the completion. , ii. The undisturbed portion of the site shall be maintained as nondisturbance buffer. iii. All cleared areas that are not built upon must be restored with native, nonfertilizer-dependent vegetation and maintained as a landscape buffer iv. No pesticides, fertilizers or similar chemicals shall be permitted on site. The Board finds that the above conditions and further a condition that all structures and construction take place a minimum of 8 feet from the landward toe of the primary dune will adequately mitigate potential adverse impacts on natural systems and their functions and values,in accordance with the recommendation of Herrmann and the Town Engineer. 3. The development will be reasonably safe from flood and erosion damage. -16- The appeal presented by the applicant relies primarily upon technical reports that document the relative stability of the adjacent shoreline for the past 40 years. However, a period of stability along a given shoreline does not necessarily indicate that the shoreline will remain stable, and regardless of its historical trends, any shoreline fronting Long Island Sound is potentially susceptible to flood and erosion damage during significant individual storm events.4 To make this proposal as reasonably safe from flood and erosion damage as is possible on a property adjacent to the Sound it should be constructed on pilings,which the applicant has committed to, and by placing it as far from the sound and a minimum of 8 feet away from the most landward toe of the primary dune is practicable and will adequately protect the integrity of the primary dune to further protect the structure from flood and erosion damage. Alternative 6 proposes to construct a single family dwelling, deck,and pool physically adjacent to and over the primary dune,which creates the potential for the degradation of the feature and undermines the feature's ability to provide protection for the development and adjacent areas against flooding and erosion. 4. The variance requested is the minimum necessary to overcome the practical difficulty or hardship which was the basis for the requested variance. The applicant also argues that the single family dwelling proposed in Alternatives 1-5 were relocated and reduced in size in the single family dwelling proposed in Alternative 6, but does not specifically address whether or how the minimum variance relief necessary to overcome the applicant's hardship. Alternative 6 proposes structures physically adjacent to the primary dune, in part to a stated desire to maintain the 40-ft. front yard setback required by the Zoning Code. The development could be shifted farther landward of the primary dune and without requiring a variance by downsizing and/or reconfiguration of the proposed structures. The approximately 1,700 sq. ft. footprint of the proposed two story dwelling is nearly twice the 850 sq. ft. minimum required by Chapter 280, and the swimming pool and deck are proposed on the seaward side of the dwelling. Given the need to balance zoning and environmental restrictions,placing the dwelling closer to the road and/or reducing the scope of the structures,the development proposed by Alternate 6 is more than the minimum relief necessary to overcome the hardship that is the basis of this appeal and the applicant has not provided any evidence or proof to the contrary. However, if the applicant moved all structures beyond a minimum of 8 feet of the landward toe of the primary dune,this Board believes that the applicant can construct a single-family dwelling and that this is the minimum variance necessary to overcome the practical difficulty or hardship of the applicant. 4 The applicant has emphasized that this area has not had significant erosion and has actually accreted through this proceeding to support the argument that it is entitled to coastal erosion permit. This Board notes that it is not the authority that draws the coastal erosion hazard line and has no jurisdiction to do so. Chapter 111 refers to the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Map of the Town of Southold prepared by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. While this Board may sympathize with the applicant regarding the stability of this coastline and the lack of erosion over the past 40 years,it cannot remove this parcel from the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area and must apply Chapter 111,as written. -17- 5. Where public funds are utilized, this criteria does not apply in this instance as there are no public funds being utilized. CONCLUSION Therefore, in the interests of justice and for the reasons set forth herein,this Board grants the applicant relief from Chapter 111 of the Town Code upon the following conditions: 1. All structures and construction occur a minimum of 8 feet from the landward toe of the primary dune depicted on the site plan prepared by Young&Young dated September 21, 2010. 2. The erection of a project limiting fence and staked hay bales along the limits of clearing, grading and ground disturbance prior to the commencement of construction and maintained until completion of construction. 3. The undisturbed portion of the site shall be maintained as a nondisturbance buffer. 4. All cleared areas not built upon must be restored with native, nonfertilizer- dependent vegetation and maintained as a landscape buffer. 5. No pesticides, fertilizers, or similar chemicals shall be permitted on site. 6. The installation of leaders, gutters, and drywells to control runoff from the proposed structures. The granting of this relief is subject to the conditions of such other permits as the applicant has already acquired or may otherwise have to acquire for final approval of the proposed project. Furthermore,this Board finds that the proposal is classified as an Unlisted Action pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations, 6 NYCRR, Section 617, and that the Board, as Lead Agency, issues a Negative Declaration for the proposal,with the above conditions. Finally,this Board finds that this project is consistent with the LWRP pursuant to Chapter 268 of the Town Code, Waterfront Consistency Review, so long as the above conditions are adhered to. Dated: January 4, 2011 -18- NOTES Young & Young ±A i AREA = 240'79 50. FT. 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 1190f VERTICAL DATUM=NA.V.DA'NM(1986) 631-727-2303 6 a SEE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE PANEL NUMBER Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor L d ' S6103G0154 H LAST DATED SEPT.25,2009 Thomas C. Wolpert, Professional Engineer e` _ &a '/ JJ9 q9' a ZONING USE DISTRICT=R-40' yDouglas S. Adams, Professional Engineer 8 / ® p4t''t1' .�p0 Robert C. Tast, Architect .00 $ HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE Nis ' �0 ,,� ..i`ej Sso. IoW og°,2V.4� r� 0� e / .� ��t�,($�m � '� OQPo� /, a� �,�O�`he S �Q�T•c�Tm"�i� ��� 5URVEYOR'5 CERTIFICATIONit SP' yT ���1 /. , A' �� •AE HEREBY CERTIFY TO ROBERT G. BOMBA THAT �1 TH15 SURVEY WAS PREPARED IN AGGOR;ANG N E Q @ s, i dd OF PRACTICE FOR LAND 5URVEYS ADOPTE m 999 YORK STATE ASSOCIATION OF PROFE551 w 0 SURVEYORS. •�P���— oG n7� �O� �/ p-� ... q ,�� � )•.YS';•'µ';• C $�y� / .cs eo �' �+y9 $y • / Rh.AL.i f :jSr. °5895 E 6 a I.D SJ A , 9• �ry ti3O \ y / HOWARD W.YOUNG,N.Y.S.L.S.NO.45593 b 0 0a c a�„° �Q ��I• /'d1, SURVEY FOR a lis , �// o �'5e 0� � 0�6ROBERT 6. BOMBARA At Southold, Town of Southold �<sh Suffolk County, New York ICE County Tax Map oswet 1000 section 54 sack 04 Lot N �s .� FINAL 5E1RVE'f SANITARY MEASUREMENTS �Ge/✓s / // ``\ � A B ST 11.51 65, DF12 21' 54- MICE WE ,s„g� a DF3 24' 49' / a I € sp r AMENDED SANITARY MEASUREMENTS R AP15,2016 a �C$ JUL 2 2 2016 MAP PREPARED FEB.22,2216 4g g I SCALE: 1".401 egd 0,r.o +r�r ®•�nwnswr rwm Q.svu�;i:r ®.srnKe roiem 405 NO.2014-0016 1 OF 1 vi,vrwwee user av•soon vers s.smoP ce•ct�n naw, $iJILD'1PiG DEM DWS.2006_0102-2014_00Tb_fe � I i 1 � ' / I' NOTES - Young & Young a�. AREA = 24,8-I11 50. FT. 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 5 • VERTICAL DATUM=NA.V.DATUM P1168) 631-727-2303 • SEE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE PANEL NUMBER Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor Is I n 0 9610960154 H LAST DATED SEPT.25,2009 Thomas C. Wo6pert, Professional Engineer ` • /fes �1' '4"o" • AMOUNT OF FILL REQUIRED=300 G.Y.t Douglas E. Adams, Propesaionat Engineer £] ,-,�• ' .� 0 � , F',�.F'D2 ��0 • FILL TO BE GLEAN'BANK-RUN SAND AND GRAVEL Robert C. Test, Architect "€ I W 'fig' E .�, ,��!// Qr _ FROM AN APPROVED UPLAND SITE. • BUILDING FOOTPRINT FIRST FLOOR AREA- [,Ile,SO.FT. ° 3 0z / fSECOND FLOOR AREA= 1,954 sa.FT. HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE : ZONING USE DI57RIGT= 'R-40' -fK4 / r Y �' OCA �• v yid / j. THE UNDISTURBED PORTION OF THE 517E SHALL BE P r �'S" c I rT�,� Pi RIO' � �(� �ryryry /y i•sst MAINTAINED AS A'NONDISTURBANGE BUFFER 6UF�®b COUNTY DEPARTMENT OFH6ALTt15ERYICES h /i/ / o/ / i / 1' �� ':( / / , /' � ERMAT FOR APPROVAL,OF CONSTRUCTION FOR& ° / / /7.54 s2 7.62 G ®�� p� ��9/ / / h 55y. ^ ^y o' / \8 �7 �po� �i �twc�,EFAf�sa4xREst®Eedc�olVB.Y "I �� i�/ / / / / / / � 0`" •✓a7s�o Av �Q ®� .a / // 9� ya 'I APPRA E ge - �� Q1 @` \° �. / / 565 / / ry i c g / 61 ee °'`�/4��/^/ ��e�9� CoQ tP��J FOR R �\ _ d/�./g� �J JFipj� t� uA7 of D€DRoo69S�' t ,��\ a y A }^/ d-T EXPIRES THREE YEARS F B ,�y �• �9, .... M DATE OF 3 �• SOS J a 1.,:e / / // 55 �ry04 4, a� PtQ 3 07 9yo/ / / / // / `� o' �.� p, / J° S t p� a§ Qepy ' _ 57 SURVEYOR5 GERTIF �j b �ts.o 777. . �cl`• \ �$ C 544> ro TEST HOLE / / ti°/ / /' �'P� / '/ rP a ° +� ° i / 3� f i/ e, of / 5/ / %C / / °j `� 5 39' �5� �/ .7 50 80� v DATE. �O6 It�ce '(610 /�' 6/ �@�.a y �``\ i /i�/ p,Y(��/ i� / 71 /�T 7 z7 HONIARD W YOUNG,N Y L.S.t�, 45893 �`'' Q 8 F1=6.45' OA' 71• PALE MOM /� ^� {{ ��:.� / � / �i p i p / E FILM TO -7.(2( (/V662 tr' a ISi i 5.49 FOR ! : FORWARSE SURVEY 67 13j0 BOMBARA 21:. BW=1135' 40 �&�\ 1__ / s ,,, r, 7 //j At Southold, Town of Southold I rydy�d� ,.25 /6.4 Oe ��. // // Suffolk County,Novi York AATIM IN /20 r-ounty Tax Mop DIWI.t IOOO sa=t,- ° Q.`i 54 si=ck 04 Lot Iq PALE TO OYdJ c . +P r 6 7t. s.a / ✓/ /// �+ COARse J d Ar. �@ii, i / //�/h� Q�c BUILnIN6 PERMIT SURVEY-ALTERNATE 9 �� fs� AK, (� �' i o\ ADDRESSED 5GDH5 NO[ APR.23,2013 El a4/ AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA APR.01,2013 y� d ADDED NON12I5TUR13ANCE BUFFER NOTE AUG.29,2012 px I/ voym AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA JAN.1.1,2012 77q // LUCS AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA MAR.10,2011 I 7 � S� AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA FEB.00,2011 ®€�; PERCENT ADJACENT AREA GOVERA6E �' /� /� //! 3��T ®`\ WLU AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA FEB.01,2011 5 t/�Q AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA SEPT.90,2010 le 7 PROPOSED �p �a/// // ! O�� C AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA SEPT.21,2010 / o e F=* NYSDEG AMENDMENTS AUG.16,2010 ° '3 FRAME HOUSE = 1A554 5Q.FT. =5.4% 7 / / / I p .N �p— _�p v2 SGDH5 AMENDMENTS NOV.25,2009 DECK =128 50.FT. =O.5% �� / �/iss / �Q" �° =9 AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA NOV.24,200-1 buy: POOL =251 50 FT. = 1.0% 731 u, AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA OCT.50,2009 Al ,mer C30 AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA SEPT.14,200-1 3 TOTAL-11•133 SCS.FT. =6.9% /� MAP PREPARED AUG.1'1,2009 psi p•asoma ma s ■•wommNr ra m 0=sTAK ser A•a Am Fano 6SJOBG0 SCALE,O.1200 _ 8 c.uawsr Ro20 =Too ovaa S.STOOP u•ceuAR ens wce o-- DWG.20060182--Op—bom1B I OF 2 � ! I AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) Antonlos Vournou, member of MKS Realty LLC,owners of premises 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold,NY 11971,(setm: 1000-54.-2-20),residing at 77 Meadowbrook Rd.,Syosset,New York, do hereby authorize our attorney, Patricia C. Moore,to apply for permit(s)and appear before the Southold Tow ii Board on our behalf. MKS Realty LLC By: Antonios Vournou Sworn to before me this 13a'day of J uary 2023 JOANNE(SAA(akO1 J�?V5W t NOTARY PUBI.JO-STATE OF NEW YORK 111 NO.G1 DEG i 92507 QUALIFIED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY 4 COf 4N41SSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER/_202 1' ' P;awa�ca.a,rF•.o.o2.m.P.z.:enc.a,-,w,o.v xem res m a e,o•ate i•.i mc.m,w:a n°,as a @,om .�r.-wn• e+-+.::s�uM a�-�eu<•":nwv m.'cnai`'moi,aRi.ee+• u,"mww`'.amc`»c'rt ass:o.=i.:w'a:e:ai a c cw=.s°�n•'.'me m'°":;s;,i`a rTm is i—vn reau .Mx.'•`rw:n�•wz:te m wv m_..dfi woo•-ci's' ._ ' .w•o:.wco.s.w.mw,o.,aww.m.o..d-um_-a..ouc.na.n m..xac,c w,°. _ - - _ METER t2'-VENTILAnan PIPE CIIA.NBPR Yolome( ) INCOMING SERVICE 400 Ostrander Avenue,Riverhead,Nen Yak 11401 �• stunt 5'/T!�'j Sedimaeafion Clwnba 277 tat.631 5 F651:='7.0144 Atuaobc-17ltmigCbimbn 278 aE�ieATFD tneerin aom _•-fa ''F}'-'� (} Aerobic Coonet l Iltaliofl CTrsaba 127 .r15 AMP BREAKER I AIR Lt,-,Put-- DiSU(K6an CIgIObC- 4 TutAl Vcluate 749 012 AG,10,60HZ,15 AMP POWER r-t-1PPLY I cTLlntEa� � ts12-2 AWG WITH GNP IN I"'PVC CONDUIT Honard W.Young.Land Surveyor - MAIN Thomas G.Wolpert,Prafes5lonal Engineer 4'D4XT Fj: - 'OUTLET PIPE - :SPECIFICATIONS -- - _ SERVICE Douglas E Adorns,ProFas�tonal Engineer _ _ _ A -Anaerab?c\tedis, PP/PE F- Rete 32% PANEL . �•-4��� - I - H=dL"o Aaobic Mo&x PVC/PP/PE FiBia Rete 16% - Robert G,-TmI,Arahiteat I I 'Aa bie Media PF IFE FOling Rete 57% Robert 5krortekl,Arehlteet • .�- _ Blower rLL63, TNA _ - [ntET'3/Sf. ', j, P.Lir]PUMP Piping PVC/PP/PE" © Ace=Coves mnic Icau Inn`__ __ _ niainfxrmt( inaau CTlodaeTIfl _ _ HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE RECIRLUTATIQJ PIPE. L pAriLs Itir2'AIR INTAKE GROUND Sg RHOMBUS AIR BLOWER ttirA'»,rx GEr:I:Ls CONTROL ROV GPEMNG'iI1P.>, B PANEL PLAN VIEW 1R'MANHOLE'lT1P., IS-MANHOLE HTP" c'4'MANHOLE fTv - SSU:FECTIUM -`'tW'°'� ELECTRICAL ONE—LINE DIAGRAM LTLINlIER mPl'IDNAU _ �ENING J ,aaa WENOTES: P-e�• t-2• ,I - I _ "-@:MET NiGW I.CONCRETE 4poo P51®26 DAYS - 2.REBAR TO BE A5TM A-615 GRADE 60 B.WELDED WIRE FABRIC ASTM 0-185 4,DESIGN®FOE AA5HT0 HS-20 LOADING 5.TOP A:Id+ M)NOLITHLA6 AND WALL ARE { 6.THE SIDEINALL AREA SHALL BE L� - r-eQ• ;r.-g�: _ <- Di•=2�' I - - -8•:6' 1 EQUAL TO THE FULL EXTERNAL WALL VVV HEIGHT OF 71-E PRECAST LEACHING 10'DIA.PIPE KNOCKOUT TOP VIEW GALLEYS DEC (EACH S)PIJ UEC 2, - � i _.AT.'Oy ASSEMHLT _ H,u®® Tw IL-3® ; ®M5 ��® '� thold'Tower -SECTION A A VIEW SECTION B-B VIEW ®®® G_ . ® �L 3I� SOU. ' -� �4•�,---� .hoard of"4'njste�'. • FU.IIGLEAN USA 0EN-5 51DE VIEW )LEACMIN&HOLE ENO VIEW (TYRL:EAC.f'IING GALLEY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION : NTS "I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WATER SUPPLY(S)AND/OR SEWAGE DISPOSAL . FLIJ GLEAN I%1--T.FIFE- NOTE;ALL CONDUITS SYSTEM(S)FOR THLSPRQ_IERWEREDESICNEDBY,MEOR,UNDERMY- F CONTROL PANEL MOUNTED BETW�N PANEL ANDUPSTREAM DIRECTION.8ASE0 UPON A CAREFUL AN�THOROUGH_S?VOY:OF'11-E SOIL. GLEAN-GIJi"1 WYE __ \4°x4'PRESSURE TREATMENT TANK NVST BE SITE AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS,ALL FACPS'TiES,'AS PROPOSED'': 9 ALARM/CONTROL TREATED WOOD P05TS SEALED TO PREVENT 6A$ CON�ORM'TO TFL�SUFFbLKCOUNTY.OEPARTMENTOF HEALTH SERVICES _ R.BLOWER LEAKAGE INTO PANEL. fANSTRULTION STANDARDS IN EFFECT AS OFTFff.S DATE.° .. -I`ytl' GOFITROLIF.R:1• NIF6 BY SJE RHOMIOUS INSULATED yyEp,TµER FOR WIFI COMMUNICATION t ' aw O_-- a51STANT BLOW92 USE(ALARM/C.ONTROL ` V ENCLOSURE ••'�\ PANEL MDLKI045040 GLEr�N-CI+T CONTROLLER°G"MFG BY L J• '•,p 9 SJE RHOMBUS HOWARD W.YOUNG,N.Y.S.LS.NO.45693a • - o ` __ THOMAS C WoLpERT,N.Y.S.PE,NO.61483 $ i DOUGLAS E.ADAMS,N,Y,S.P.E.NO.60897 'A SWEEP MAY BE USED 'AIR LINE TO - - E-_-TP�-=N WYE AND CLEANOUT OWT9 i I SURVEY FOR FR2 STH INLET LATERAL TO FUJI GLEAN UNIT � ! FIN GRADE ON P11 EA 5K!VT AIR VENT GAP �J`� ELELTRICGUFFLY l MKS REALTY, i.1.C. (4 BEDROOMS) MFG BY TIF-TITE SCALE,NT5 / TG BLOWER FFEL=1850 FiB'MIN FROM ANY ER_EGSUPPL SUPPLY TIC FS SPLICE DOOR OR WINDOYU SIF'LY OWLS SPLICE BOX /s .la• 16. CONTROL PANEL 4 BLOWER at Southold,Town of Southold e _ 4^PVC® 4"PVC,0 41 Pic m SCALE NTS Suffolk County,New York a 2,00%MIN. 1.00%MIN. IDOSE MIN. - - - RISERS 4 COVB25NOTE5 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY _ z WITH SAFETY LIDS LOCKING MFG BY TUF-TITE OR CASTING TO � ,T-E OATS SHALL eE"IOGEL CLT-5 MANL'FACTF2-BY m APPRDVED EQUAL GRADE FUJI-CLEAN USA, County Tax Map Unmet 1000 seg•m 54 Bwa 04 ... 20 c ,EL=10. 1 RIM=R7S RIM=105 I .E.:OS' 2.THE GFS�GN ENGINEER,FL•�IGLEAN7 USA st_-F'RESE\T.ATI V= FIE)A SURVEY COMPLETED NOV.25,200210 �^ FIG AND 5GDH5 REPRESENTATIVE-:SHA-_OBSERVE THE MAP PR�ARED TUN.25, o GANG COYER OP 114 NSTALLATIGh OF T{-OATS_AND LEACHING 5Y5=v, aV, A:RIniE�- _ _ �'- AF=ROYAL FR--M ALL T+�,-PRIOR TO EAGKFILL- Record of Revisions IE=B.A 1 0\-5"VENT _ i REVISION DATE E=8.04 IE-1.14 f 3,THE SYSTEM START UP WILL Ir COMPLETED UNDE¢THE t - __ NOV.72;2021 HOLE DIRECT SJPEZVISION OF A FL'JIGLEAN USA •nom#�-.:r-=_ APAP27,2022 �lE=b:l I I IE=T55 SIE=T3T lhfOIA(A1'R'20:2022)'�-'-- GONNEGT 3`PVG 2 I REPRESETTAT JE. BP DATA OCT-14`022 VENT LINE TO-lbT SEE DETAIL FOR ';' - l 6�OATA - _ NOV-30:2�2�G HOLE IN OW5T OWTS COMPONENTS POURED INVERT- i 4.AN E.N THE 14 OPERATION AND IDER AND CONTRACT 067=4.70' ONNER NTH=MAINT--N—Ev PROVIDER ANG PROPERTY PROVIDE GLEAN OUT AT _ _ _ 4'DIA,DISTRIBUTION BOX 1 �� t OWNER'?UST BE SLEALTH S TO THE SUFFO_) COUNTY FACE OF BUILDING- r - - 8'-8• i, DEPARTMENT 'T C I/A j--Rr PS RAT O)PRIOR TO BOT d.=EEO APPROVAL C THC NC V41 T3 RCG STRATI ON BY TISL AIR LINE TO BLOPME I - SGDHS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 19 OF ThE HE -OLK - - 18 HIGHEST EXPECTED 6W VIL-6 CG'NTY SANITARY DOGE io 500 6AL,VA OWTS -.,we•+.,.-,...++. __. :_ ,- _. -. _ - .-..- '^`^'� _ MDL'•GEN 5 MFG'SY FUJIGLEAN Lt=._.:1 PROVIDE END GAP LEVELING DEVICE r Iti15FED PLGGR ELE'J.�.TIGN(5%TG 'JERIF:Eti B'r THE It MDLUSL-4 MFG ELY VELING OR SANITARY LEAGHIN6 GALLEY: ARCHITECT. TOTAL OF(4)GALLEYS TOB N0.20266153 APPROVED EQUAL FOR All BID SFSWA 2 OF 2 . DISTRIBUTION BOX OUTLET PIPES _ DWG.202�0353_bp - - I IiNo•¢�0.�•!amrsnro.cv4se,[!+.+m.aeav Sixu ra�va[•PKS T•n[0.b,m,w Ul va.�s 9cP.om•nn rc[snn.KU Ria ueixaam•IIm'�IKva[••[,rt R'Ini�!L tLuka ,n 1l1 LCCpeR 9eK��C!¢•K Ki/Y UM.X�Lu[i iItPP4eSa?r 9✓u.[l Moa.•q C[+1rUeb ' P[P Swl w W,C K R:P.A ro..,E CM,U NO,•¢•b b.,n Ul•W<n,rel«w•.,,o>�k KPt�ab LR'•[R S.MJ•�I.r.�n NL,.P+uNl•�•,1 C��L e�it0`<m AEYPa"C••[R U:K WP.G n tO,[P:1Pir v.a!i>)a[Rtrtca IL�1 F[r.PLL,/(P?r•RYv dmf no V 0•t.oru¢•N MRr N enue,Riverhead.Non York 11q01 LOT COVERAGE TEST HOLE - 400 o9rr•Gridartel. 1 M_-_Ao ax.663172-7AI44 BY MrDONNn 6E05cm+X - oem'rleyamgongineerirlgsom PROPOSED Folt7B7f/Lslm _ -- }V� •�'rf4144y(f RAA4EHOUSE 3GARAGE -3,053 SF - EL=556 0'0• �►'}` 1�J�V{i{i••{if�`� RAISED DKK =1.484 SF vueamawN POOL =448 SF STB Howard VL Yowrg,Land 3vrveyor FRONT ENTRY STAIRS =519 SF .. L9A� Thomas CO. . olpart,Professfanal engineer DRIVEWAY =3,93 SF NAM = 17ougloe E Adams.FYofessiorol Engineer a - Q TOTAL-8,683 SF=14.77L cm ` - Robert C'.Test,Ardtlteat ix'=Las 42" Robert Stromski,Architect J �6� ♦i w.,s[mv,[Le S wO ms SITE DATA VEL rJ , Q op r' I r,♦ "I � (ssm AREA=L3530 ACRES OR 58,936 SQ.FT: ♦ - '7�� LO \�,h'�l�. 0 Q •BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS BOUNDARY LINES SHOWN AS SCALED FROM FLOOD r•'• r+ .i♦ -A G/s J \'O/- INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL NO.36103=54 H LAST DATED SEPI2.5,2". C VP i s nAL tlo ye/ �7`ya^ �pI •VERTICAL DATUM =NAVD(1986) y 3r P J `DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER =4 FT '/� O p"•(? ,r♦ /� me �;p •HIGHEST E%PECTEDGROUND WATER ELEVATION °L7 P.P 2' ++`.-G5 •++ sii -e r •NUMBER OF BEDROOMS(DESIGN KuLVAtENM =4 O 'MIt Cej` Jh• i +c�Ea.' �- �fi - EE' =440 GAL VP� ` + !! ori •�` `' IIMUM REQUIRED I/A OWTS GIPACL7Y E 75 J'f 'PROVIDED LA OWTS CAPACITY =500 GAL �a °♦ , r ♦C - to^y "♦ ': ♦ : I' ' +y, O - f ` •LEACHING SYSTEM REQUIRED =300 SF5WA + j °- ri 'eb Q'�' � LEACHING GALLEYS PROVIDED =318 SFSWA .1127 e -818 Y+ r. • /. - - y" i r .� j'69b' , h• O�\QY '•I ,D• r♦ 7 /r p/" ,♦' ,�r r +ass pyo �P�' -' � / ♦ 1.r4r ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION a o ♦. p°Cvt'�O.�j\4'' ♦.�' I i. i •�' q _ � x J, +e:r -`e. `r � �y - �.,`�J�yc-�O THE HEREBY CERTIFY ,D/OR SEWAGEDISPOSAL y � DEkMYYTEM(S) OE ' '�,'�1\\• may' ♦ ++ � r �.'� r� - '=:en , �.�ffpY% S�P pF DIRELTIDTI.-BASED UlON'A'LARERIL AND THOROULA•I STUDY OFT}(E SOA. •'�Qr O; / + Iss��'� � !• - rs ye'..,;:5�'p-: �`+_-_ .'!� r QO �`4�� SITE AND 6'ROUNDWATER CONDITIONS.ACI.FAGAI7TES.AS PROP051:D:. � '•� ooh � ;' d ,r '°o , ---=- 't! � y P o�P' CONFORM TO THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DBARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES '`� - -- �r ✓ 101'_ .. fir,35 � vCONSTRUCTION STANDARDS IN EFFECT AS OF.TFOS DATE' /' '�O A. ♦4�prl., r. _§`a f>_ Ny�t�' -..le.,-"i • _s� r �'T PT IN, P ♦y. rC /.� ! r � .Pa 6/ a. ` '� ♦. °i." i _ !'�O'k' 1 is/A?e i ,�4 r=j�T v ,'.L� , .�•' .JPF" e� a ? F'r ° X4:9• ,' .4 I r� t f ,p •. o. \ { p, NO. r d\' HOWARD W.YOUNG,N.YS.LS.NO.458936THomA - �. .ir P�P r', ++,•, `� `�, ` `tee 0'r r.1b- L r�..` i76E oti, OP / G.`4 DOUGLAS c. ADAMS, YS�ENO-B01483 ' ,bl f ! v , 1•• ee`';'r E,.�Y♦°, y (� ° ye �Oq. / ,p\- N.Y.S.PEN0.8089/ - cf �' 4 • _S d QOM r `QJ DOUGLAS E ADAMS. `�y♦,ql :.i., l_Qph�O•,P�..t ^oie i3.4` .i.31'":;1f.%r.;.,9i5ii l� ..rip d. ''°i♦ %, f _ ^DP ♦° i,` / O, r k4' a �? °o,�cP ,p1 h4LMF SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION-- vp?♦w,{� -• c.co '•hr` r � � '' ifi "� -:_::`':'yi.. .ti., OPo- i 4 tj 't i' � VOQ �_� - --- -- / u , p? ,'(_ -�.,f_ h ,(t. ', r !rio c f ..�rXa• ro�.-e°,. ° ��`.• �• •WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE• ♦,- y .{�. _ h r r ` WITH THE CODE OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYS i100PTED 8Y THE NEW YORr< + �O•L\P� i' «-�1A''Qo�rr,�r Q - a ��'f T•=: - - / STATE ASSOCUTION OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYQRS. R .-:i Be_• �rl i +�,- --s l' 06°♦ `�Qr_ `d7.i; .'„ 1 _ t 4' ° jx f zV�,c�aa jrcP'r� � `' `.•� .�.: i ,ori• �`�. � r - -- G ` 0.1HOWARD W.YOUNG.N.Y_,L.S.NO.4503 S �n Bad% rYo 2965 '/+roy rl,� r♦ r9 �° L /.A- P//.. ,c0,^JF �. -. .''�:V.SI„J.N- r. -"? ♦ i'S h.�u e.,'.,, Q'y - - - - y SURVEY FOR Y il1G!�I'My r`6;•{,r=- :�' !..- ` i !�S `- i c' �h°r•..{si _ :� G'. �. .lob MKS REALTY, LLC. -'r� �t Q, r is-. , v� •°o�j i o o � f � l: at Southold,Town of Southold i r Suffolk County,New York HEALT14DEPARTMENTUSE s DRAINAGE CALCULATIONSr `` CowtyTaxMap 1000 sc[Lm BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY o ,��♦♦ ry%�WpJh ,f„pQO %,(t' '•-L_^WSF� E r /' 54 c�a[ 04 :r: '20 TRIBUTARY 1-VOLUME REQUIRED 2/12 _ DRIVEWAY.3.183SFxx0.60 =338 CF NOV.25.2020 of♦S ,•� %. aP •cr_: _• cct.1L1 ROOF:1.507 SF x 2/12 x 10 =251 CF y,i� -.� gp,sl• IP `� /r r D 3 TOTALREQUIRED =569 LF M ti♦,' - Q• \ f%7 Ea �•' �1\�J FIELD SURVEY COMPLETEMAP PREPARM JUN.25.2021 VOLUME PROVIDEDRecord of Revisions USE LF41 O `Q -/ . -._______ _•_ - TE (3)10'DIAx3'DEEP DRYWELLS =616 LF g� u� r REVISION Nov_'12 z NOIAtiI 021 OCT.14.gPqL4 APR.27-2022 TRIBUTARY12 VOLUME REQUIRED ,��♦r a r 1 \ DEC _ 2 2022 NOIA(A40.20 2022) p01�.30,ZC22 C L BP �P DATA ROOF.2.50 SF x 2/12 x LO =258 CF VOLUME PROVIDED USE LMAh�O rr (2)10'DIAx3'_DEWDRYWELLS =411 CF ��,`/ SOUtholdTown �r Board of Trustees 30 ,0 ;15 30' '60 m Scale:l"= 30' r r JOB NO.2020-0153 DWS.2020_0153* 1 OF 2 • 1 i • • • - M. • • - •aft+a�M i++f11•ll+Iwla1 •r+• •• ►a•++a i+aas *z +r a•a a�•+1•a+1 a+ •w+At a+ •aa+ _ - �1w a+++a f++a•+w j �• a•�afi +!algal•+alaal•++•�aaa!1 +8w1+•Ia1 •!• - • • - • - • : ♦i I • - 11aa+♦a1a a!a++ +f 1a1 t j !+ a•" a+ a a i a • ! +f ♦ • +1 +1 1•+1 t! •w11•++f++•�Ifal••aa•a1`t-.t a�1•a'�! ♦ •"'l'1►��aaa+a+r•M++a f1•r a+1R�•Ia••Ia f ll+a a+i 1 R T•qa+1l�•11ft,04 aaa�••4.,Wo W-02" fllai•awJ d A+1•ate^aLJ•"il4, IILa��•, a1�+Ilal•a+aaar • ' - 11 • - �r• !1 •+ • wye.ah ++ • • 11 +a • r� trh �• +,. �w �„ !• •a 11 ♦ e • ae a., •� to+•+•aa, • • • `• - •. -• ►•wel+a++a aaa Iaa$ir +al•wiaa•aaaa+aa as a 1•a ieaaaaa ear+a•'+aaa+a a•!•a'�a••ala`••+!aaa••+a�.ri ''s a•,�, +��+1�1 awA a •1�ai j�wa1 a•s a!+IaQ aat+1+aaa •a1 jaaaaaae�aaai aR1+a�`aa�11�a�1 as+1�+a •R���llw•a+a+aha±jaalf�fa��a•' - • hia+fialaaaalaaa+lllaaa=i♦+liaRwl+w•11a+��iaft`rl+fli Ii ,.4.9 0r..aaf • • / iea 1 • a Alit AV" AIR ! • 1 +l 11 a1 w +I t a l a• + ay . • • r�• p, .,�„ ! ; ,•h ,!Ilaea.wla�2--yo Area of Natural,Veget�ation,to Re�ain�•.+.a'la+ee•••Iaa� '•R. r� R a•,ala a, all iiw•,o aIra1-+'iti alaa•`f•aas a�1•a-=ifs+♦+.��al l/lai s`_ ••-;:' ,, q,, _ �• , if+••1a ►1 •aaa lw Iw ail al aa• 18 aaw f aaa+we • R az, e1l1 • 1` aF ♦ +v ; i. �• V ••+�ia•+qR a+• ►+ +•+a�'+ Ri •+aa•fsr +sAa•ia'r+ a a1 • '�i1!•aai i.►+.-�e�k li +aaaa• ► a +agar 4 •.. Ia!•u.R a1a/w n� r iy,••i„'dl /rq�1a••�•fa• •1a���►f�+Rt If aaa • +++Ia+Ir 11+11 I a4• • . • . • as ♦h�w�•'►;s+�a �afyi••� a+f + l• Sffy+L•ra�•a111e 86aCh�graSS 1;' wll•+fll:•le i,�i w - ►a1 + a+fllewla'' i:+ a+•ea�e •1�`, aE c;'�i +a• ++ i i Beach ea •1•a• + i• 111�R• a -1-041 , • a1a11 ri ♦ p �1 �1 •tlltl 1p f • • _ . • - • • • �aliw+ 111••1 •1a�+1;f•a+4a1�••aawl, al1!•1+11 •a�fi1 ,. Il•,�R�1 r11/+fw G d• • • • 1 1 " . • rwali#+ a 1 aa11�'+•a�f*lIRa1 !laal,� �a•a;r�wMMIaaa ►f•i� Rugosa rose s _,.- F.r, �, har ♦ e.1a. ac &'•1 a ► l • l-0 +h -0�.+.� L+•, a ••u a.�il r+e1.1; _ _ • . • �ti�a••i;•j�•aais a• a•4• i a = al v +a a astal anis rass •4 w+a h as a +a - • ,• • • • • - •. • •-. 1w 1 w • ; •MINI a Iw • ♦1 Iw •wp g R • �•l al Il R a+• Qat1 a +e •11.1 ar R• +••wlll ani • o a♦ +e 1+ a .a+r.1 a1•a .. Rw•11111bw•e •T+l+lla+ala • as a�l♦•a1i�Rwwa•�a Northern bayberry �;•!. .r.�+ • o,� ! 1 a1 a1 all •a a 41rrw all a1 • •+, •! h aur_`• +;• •,- ++a�ila+w l ,• • - • - • • ra ala a+1 l ya•n►•!�s••l+ +l ll+1! • r pop a as +a R + `� a • a a Eastern redcedar .t a d iti_ a Moo fa11111 Il • ti •I! lw1•�f1ON ONfa•♦ a11a/1ai1a1•aw1+ . L �+r L` ..� e aw f1•+ + w!r Fi a ♦ • 1l a�11 11 11 11 !11 1.1 ill l w1 alR+`r1 11 • • • • • • . •lfall••{!y,.Zh+!<i�� s7M1411a111•f•1w11i lalaq+•w+111�►1 Blacklcherlyrllall•1v1a1f••'raaQilVla •,•• - • • - •. - • . 1 1 • Tw•,ll+:l•+wxt:0`If�r a+1.1 f la��++a+a/w1aa1+11aafa•r r11a1 alw lwlw w l a +1 a,._�. as alb. *r ,�jj a1'�i'Ra a 1, ••11+ •w 1f1•• 1+1a•aa lac Maa4w=1 a•111aa1s' a aMr�a+a"r Ir s ! a+ •1a+w +f • 1 y_ v wf ww we'••w ♦ w • :. w 1 al 1 a + . • - ha «:mssO%�it i1 e,•hi�si slah•��•1+%+a%�i1�+laaii�i irl� a'ii#+a� • - •. - • •' 1•Iaa'�+1a!•At, m4f+e'rrw1w4 T• 1•l•++e►wlslar 4) a1+q a lw �•j+l w t • i•�a1�rf.Ma=+ata •t,+tsa++ ��11i►111+•ti !aaR�•ar=aisa�alIr+�+,aa�•l �+a a1 �at .:,;ya 'a•�@:�iisti+ /' / / / / • • 1 rani ha li a i a aw a- .+a Daae•• as+a1 •R+i ae irrr •�:*J• '•+ Il 1 b' w 1111 + ♦ ! ♦aa�a1 !h ?. a a••al•�• • s . !!� a+ -01 'aw • 11+iw R • •y ra iawt te.e a.11i .R a-° 1+•1 Aa ! -W �+f aa•• +• r • / / • . • - • - • MN1�I�,r++•laR�1�1+R `Vurs�lw _••, l/i as + 'a�1a 1+Ial�1+ra� •�s' 1w�1� �w �-� t�.*-'1 • I / /' / a! + •+ + Art. s`siR•a�!w, , a"�Ma►wi XI aaa a1 +.. I•11 M• • atr *74 Ra► • i •a••r1a11••1 �, ��• • a/a 1�Is. [ r •m / Y.; ♦ R•j a f1 1n •a 1 11 a•1 w + ac,l • 1w y • l 1 -294 +a !•, r- `• b a1 �l 1• + Jill, +1 +e +♦ •l a! 11 +• 1w +• +a`�• • . • I/ / / _ I / / I / • / I I i1 I=♦! 1*•,• al 1•! Otarla •! l.•fw 11 •l •l Iw Awl 7l 1l Ml e• + l•.'r►w�III•. la..ta�• ll+e +e' wR •l a1 re •f of a• i1 a. •tie a ♦ ail•t` 40* '� t^a�"J w !• r1R'"+a�••lf•1�rwk aaaaa1a11 f a.�- jf*g1111111aw iii l i�NN ,+l a+sas•ira� ►!a ac�sl+la•++� i�+ice•+moi•1Wo w•+da�lloa1•all�•1a+1a• @11�w��►of1i11ly+r«� / . • • - • ♦,. 1•+• ! +• • • f l . y1 h h b 1aa1a • ♦l A1a•a• '� .. 1,��> i Il 1, Iw a�+►-'�l f1 •w Cir •,y •elal l 1w M a ! 1 . • aw ik-74 a •aii •a1++rwal+w� 1a+�•r�1%��w%•�aa1�i`.. - - • -- • '/ / / • I // • I /' • � +_+ ii«a++ !y h aa�r wl I�a•�aaa•a1 •1 •, 1• a •w1 ;• �,••s a • aas r r • •r a ++ b +a 1laaaw+a h + aa�++l•al•+aa+ aa1 • , _ • M v • �1Q 1f •J 1+I ate..1•l�•a a�r� x+1111 all R+at I II+1 aa1•aR •�•U♦q 1111 r • • RUM •, - • • waeEild%a�lwaa+l�..+lwe, :�•r i++a11=a+a1��11a�•l=`3•la+�+ll W* it • • • " • •. - • . • • iw M1 ! 11l�ll"t j Wj#ir1.1�r;sr,• aaa++111f+a11��y1•. • a a y l•# •4'�l mala • • �IaelltaAa itil„ .• aw 1�_1�4��•a:,�a1�� .'.'.a ��.- Ln ir. i • lot • ' + i; f "R7,W, •} I • `r, r�p..tgl .• • • • • • • •. • . • y _ say A„ • _ ' • _ • . • 1 1 • • •r. �s =ac• 1 1 1 ' 1 • Ero'ogical Sin :r ZONING INFORMATION PROPOSED PLOT PLAN srt KM LEGEND_ 1 Z°"'G CALCULATIONS L O NIG ISLAND SOUND .r®�_>♦•Rrp•.If,.4a s4nrt�.,mR.,fancrs PROPOSED BUILDING DISTRICT R-40 REQUIRED SECTIDN TOTAL PROVD TEST HOLE LOT SIZE 40.000 S-F- 290 ATCH 1:1 58936.00 S.F CONFORMS THE UNE ALONG APPRCXIMATE ® SILT FENCE LOCATION LOT WIDTH 150.00 FT. 290 ATCH 3:I 200.00 FT. CONFORMS SPY M.DONALD GEOSCIENCE HIGH WATER MARK AS LOCATED K�Ii.'\I�K:\II LOT DEPTH 17500 FT 280 ATCH 3:1 298.57 Fr. CONFORMS DATE.05n 1106 BY US ON 11!25/20 LIMIT LINE OF WORK -.RAI FRONT YARD 50-00 FT- 280 ATCH 3:1 38.90 FT. NON-CONFORMS 1.,.•.. `�!••^ AVERAGE FRONT YARD SETBACK 3890 FT. 38.90 FT. CONFORMS d�0.�' O.O ���,"I SIDE YARD 1500 FT 280 ATCH 3:1 18.00 FT. CONFORMS PAIS BROWN surz 1• IfY r 1. FIMIE TO µ.::;�,n`•car AGGREGATE SIDE YARD 35.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 53.83 FT. CONFORMS F*M TO N 40'28'59"E 200.04' REAR YARD 50.00 FT. 290 ATCH 3:1 22500 FT- CONFORMS - 1 MMD -_ -: --.-._��.:-. ►N S A•I�N I. (3W) u .KIOa MAXIMUM PERMITTED DIMENSIONS: LOT COVERAGE 20%(11,78720 S.FJ 280 ATCH 3.1 14%(8,1809 FT) CONFORMS WATER IN - --"--• -- 3 -- &ALDING NEK.WT 35.00 FT. 780 ATCH 3:1 3500 FT COIFORMS PALE BROWN - - , NUMBER OF STORIES 2 V2 280 ATCH 3.1 2 CONFORMS FINE TO - r COARSE Z U) 0 SAND 0 ul E FIRST FLOOR AREA: w" PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR 2.40115 F. t 1.O' BEACH NT PROPOSED FROM ENTRANCE IMPERVIOUS 496 1 SF 3 PROPOSED GARAGE 591.8 S.F. Q - -- a Q) ` 0 ! . PROP.FOIST FLOOR EXT.DECK 1.2849 S.F. Q _ ` < PROP.POOL 448.0 S.F. Q 8 ` - FLOOD BOUNDARY LINE Q) '- MEZZANINE FLOOR AREA ZONE VE(EL-16) AS SCALED FROM FLOOD - - - - - w 0 ._-- INSURANCE RATE NAP PROPOSED MASTER BEDROOM 878.5 S.F. ._. -- l y rt laosailo a ZONE VE(EL-13) •------ 0 0 - F _ c c.w•>of z.•m.^>: .. wn fq�. uaa6 N, SECOND FLOOR AREA: 2.219 5 5 F. ........................................ __ __- p K.O.p1 Sri EDGE OF BEACH GRASS -� --�- m 3 R t'wwc ucn -01-0:,01 o, COMPLETE FLOOR AREA TOTAL 5.8W7 S.F. w �Y7 `� ouau c• > ADA LOT COVERAGE•BREAKDOWN _-__ Jrj ~"'---- -_ ------- LOT -____ .�vw�,A-uc c•'. uaa r I'M ouc- DWELLING(WOOD FRAME) 2.449.9 S.F. 0 - y-' _-- m RAISED DECK 1264.9 S F. .� �~ -- JY: 'c 6 ---- � �� - - - - PROPOSED 4'WIDE PATH POOL 448-0 S.F. ^ --- -- __'? SRED THRU AREA OF MIN. e1 0 c _ 7__. _______��-•`. C VEGETATION. 1 $ +a _ 4 1- ENTIRE SUBJECT LOT IS FRONT ENM STEP SYST�1 498-1 S.F. Q 0 `i•.. ` %0 MAINTAINED AS AESTABLJOHED D 3,5WD 5_F. DRIVEWAY t -_ - � Q 3 �ti ., 7 } 'NON-DISTURBANCE BUFFER' LOTCOVFRAGETOTAL --" (14%)8,/802 S.F Q m �' BeAt.M O1W8{ , AREA%NrrH A PROPOSED 4' ---�� WIDE ACCESS PATH THRU LOT AREA 58294-00 &F ----.._1j 7� I .__�'1 THE TION-DISTURBANCE m , x BUFFER'AS INDICATED. AMOUNT OF FILL REQUIRED 470.00 CY (�\ _ 4 ; c• _._._- (FILL TO BE CLEAN BANK-RUN SAND AND GRAVEL FROM APPROVED UPLAND SITE) ^ .•� POOL ED UN EQUIPMENT � -' 9-��� LOCATED UNDER DECK K faire.+� (GROUND LEVEL) N� .. -... NG AREA ID BUILDIFIRST FLOOR 2,401.1 SF. DASHED UNE OF M6765 SF MASTER ���_�`�•���^• •����. _ O MASTED FLOOR 0.H.ABOVE. FLOOR 22195 S E LIMIT OF 14lb! •� \� " - RESIDENTIAL OACKUP O J I PROPOSED ML --- - 'v��. � r � GENERATOR LOCATED m Z SCHEDULE FOR OPEN SPACE AS PER 280 ATTACHMENTS (APPROX.470 CY) 9 diyb N UNDER DECK n Q SIZE OF LOT(0SAC) 58,908.00 t.35 AC CONFORMS jy * _ O _ __ - • .���..•• J MINIMUM OPEN SPACE 20% 000.0 S.F CONFORMS I - - O D_ MINIMUM SET BACK 30 OOD 0 FT CONFORAMS PIER LINE IN ACCORDANCE W/BO_ ` I _ 4 _ W MINIMUM BUFFER OF TRUSTEES(DECK SPACE) - oaf - - ___-'- jam.. �- m§ W 20 000.0 FT. CONFORMS • J^^-�-- } - -�- COSTING BUFFER TO PIER LINE IN ACCORDANCE W/10D�e "I _ � 1.�� --- -- • .tap lr REMAIN- W o n ri r (Q OF TRUSTEES(LIVING 3^'.CE) _ - �t�- ♦ U a y FLOOD INSURANCE RATE PANEL No. 36103CO154H UST UPDATED: 9.252009 (SEC.275-2A) �• _----- r• • (SEC.273-11.C-2.CJ�---�-_-# _ •t.y -ter-�-!/ i I'OO6s1 We xLu SUBJECT LOT: 1925 NORTH SEA ROAD,SOUTHOLD __ ___ Y�o,.j •' - '� , _ PROPOSED POOL SECTION:54 BLOCK-04 LOT(S):227 ✓ ' rt PROVIDE ACCESS TO tO-, i O 1z 0 ZONING:RESIDENCER40'DISTRICT 1000 "PO.' Un1O ','-� ` ' POOL DRAIN FOR 2 p> d AE(EL-12) •� R•4+-,40> MA1 C NOTES v _ Mp gp BOUNDARY LlN AS^ .f z • ALL ZONING REFERENCES PER ZONING CODE OF THE �- I D a - f PLCO _C O v 1 J e i" o TOWN OF SOUTHOID .-__.. f e_��: • 3 - _ - SCALPED FLOOD _ - - _ CE RATE NAP PROJECT. v_ • THE UNDISTURBED PORTION OF THE STIE SHALL BE -BFT.DUI.z 4FT. L REVISKXIS n - ---�• DEEP MAINTNNED AS A UNDISTURBED BUFFER. D MING POO AVERAGE FRONT YARD-- -" m a 0) •--. 'Td•�.u .."I's• -W- 0 BACKWASH SYSTEM. t 1E REVISIONS .. 7 +y __ SETBACK(EST.BY e 2 Z _ �-" l / 4te •.- - PROPOSED 1200 GAL- ADJACEM HOMES) f: 01 Z i, • ' I% UNDERGROUND - B■ ( _ L 1 • ( PROPANE TANK .. DRIOVEW ED GRAVE o- EDGE O5'TO KENNEY'S ROAD ) - - -' �_....._= 9011- o M fsuss Pu•[c R.n lno 16--0• E7(13T1NG �` -i1i. 4i --_.___:. - LW I _ PAVEMENT �1i! _ EDGE OF EXISTING .3 �_.,a.�a(•_OP.oraiiwol (SOF YARD SFIBACQ - _ -___. - A PAVEMENT C �:,e.ee(Rwlsm DEop n-,e.s lr.o.POot 00o1N01 _ I 10 4 '� p' w EXISTING UNDERGROUND ww1eR rc \ 1 WATER MAIN 1.L .... .. .... ....... - --- 1 -- --\ S `� PROJ EC7 LIMING FENCE 8 I_ - - ' N O R T H S EA D R I V E � •, .� -___-___ _ '1 HAYBALE6 ALONG LIMIT Of PATE COMMENT_- _ ,rtttaa,at ,><.n«c.owlrF 000E wnr_ �1� j 1 PROPOSED SITEPLAN CLEARING,GRADING AND a,�,• rRocllYss r�Kr_ ))' - w.u�.wD�•A[rowsl® - GROUND DISTURBANCE,SEE -- fwneeuctn - 7,� Insloa eoneRna a*c..wwue 1 SCALE 1'=20'-CP DETAIL F4/At-2.R Wl V W11CJ.L t MORRONTK 7 v dA w000 RRe E-X waver cac,nc ` I - f rr.w Jnr cR.ori •��I I L�r - ." IwcAI PROJECT Ne 21-35000 DEC - 2 2022 DATE Ya TAB sm a1MOp a:L,o- OIIMIMN eY arw (. IaX fruOat D>•alEu 8Y: . AN WOM' C2 'POOL SECTION -VIEWING NORTH SoutholdTOIMA Board of µ 4. KV[1.11f�IOMOtl1.11.W MPRH tYI lOYa1YG SC M fNW WMMAH SCALE 174'=1'-O' I+�I la oacw+'np+ciwakwaa aw.aoa■eirua.�u�'•'iu coaMc.as sou crotMrl.•.nl.fw Project Narrative for MKS Realty, LLC at 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold SCTM #1000-54-4-20 December 6, 2022 Project Narrative Prepared By t Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. LT T T 570 Expressway Drive South, Suite 2F, Medford,NY 11763 ind v se Contact: Kelly Risotto, Senior Ecologist/GIS Manager Tel. (631) 727-2400 Email. krisotto(a,landuse.us Description of Proposed Activities and Existing Dune Conditions Prepared By Young &Young 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead,NY 11901 Contact: Douglas Adams Tel. (631) 727-0144 Email. DEA(u>youngen 'ng� eering com Project Purpose and Need The purpose of this project is the development of the last existing vacant lot within the developed neighborhood north of North Sea Drive as a single family residence. The residence is proposed in line with or landward of the existing line of development. The site approximately 1.35 acres, and is zoned residential R-40. This use is compatible with current zoning as well as the existing character of the neighborhood. Description of Proposed Activities The property owner is applying for a Wetland Permit and Coastal Erosion Permit from the Town of Southold for construction of a two-story 3,053 SF single family dwelling with attached garage; 21'10"x 11'9" (253.5 SF) seaward bedroom balcony with railing system; 10'4" x 20'2" (191.7 SF) mezzanine level bedroom balcony with railing system;privacy screen wall along the west side;6'wide spiral staircase to ground; 1,484 SF raised deck on the north and east sides containing a 448 SF pool on the east side; 3'9" wide stairs with railings to grade on the north side; 3'6" stairs with railing to grade on the east side; 10' wide bar/grill area on the pool deck; 513 SF impervious front entry stairs on the south side; 3,183 pervious stone blend driveway; 1,200 gal underground propane tank; innovative/alternative onsite wastewater treatment system (UA OWTS) containing (1) 500 gal wastewater treatment unit and (4) 8.5' L x 2' effective depth sanitary leaching galleys; public water service connection; and stormwater management system with (5) 10' diameter x 3' deep drywells for storage and treatment of runoff from 2 inch rainfall event. Approximately 480 CY of clean fill from excavated areas will be used for site grading. All mechanical equipment will be located above the second story structure. A breakdown of the size of each proposed structure is provided on the Survey/Site Plan, as well as in the table below. Proposed Structure Size(SF) %Lot Coverage Dwelling 3,053 5.2 Deck 1,484 2.5 Pool 448 0.8 Front Stairs/Landings 513 0.9 Gravel Driveway 3,183 5.4 TOTAL 8,681 14.7 The project has been designed to maximize setbacks to Long Island Sound(>213 feet), the beach(> 100 feet), the dune/beach ridge crest (> 30 feet), and the landward limit of the dune/beach ridge (> 2 feet). Structures are proposed on piles and elevated to meet current FEMA requirements for a VE El. 13 flood zone per map #36103C0154H (effective 9/25/2009). Structures will also be designed in accordance with standards set forth in ASCE/SEI 24-14, Flood Resistant Design and Construction, for construction in coastal high hazard areas. These standards have been adopted by NYS and the Town within their respective building codes. Wastewater will be treated with an UA OWTS proposed in the southwest corner of the site and sized in accordance with Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS)residential standards. This UA OWTS will reduce nitrogen loading to groundwater and surface waters when compared with traditional sanitary systems, and is the preferred environmental alternative for development in sensitive areas. Stormwater from a 2 inch rainfall event will be treated and stored in drywells proposed throughout the site. Pool backwash water will also be treated and stored in a drywell specific to that purpose. Approximately 200 feet (width) of beach and dune habitat will be preserved with this project, through establishment of a variable width natural and undisturbed buffer seaward of development activities. The Project Narrative 12/2/2022 1925 North Sea Drive,Southold 1/3 buffer is 100-120 feet wide within the vegetated dune, and an additional 90-100 feet wide within the existing beach habitat. Areas of disturbance will be planted with native vegetation in accordance with the Native Planting Plan. Trees to be planted along the property edges include Eastern red-cedar (Juniperus virginiana) and post oak (Quercus stellata). Shrubs to be planted include bayberry (Morella pensylvanica) and beach plum (Prunus maritima). Herbaceous species to be planted and seeded include American beach grass (Ammophila breviligulata), coastal panicgrass (Panicum amarum), and seaside goldenrod (Solidago sempervirens). All of these species are currently found within vegetated areas of the property. For protection of adjacent properties, natural areas, and Long Island Sound, areas of disturbance will be contained with a perimeter silt fence installed in accordance with NYSDEC and Town standards for fence height and embedment. Silt fence shall be installed prior to the start of any construction activities, shall be maintained for the duration of construction, and will be removed after final stabilization of the site is achieved. Existing Ecological Conditions The subject property is undeveloped and largely undisturbed. The northern third of the site is unvegetated beach habitat to the property boundary at mean high water. The central third of the site is a vegetated dune habitat with herbaceous species that include beach grass (Ammophila breviligulata), beach pea (Lathyrus japonicas), coastal panicgrass (Panicum amarum), common reed(Phragmites australis, sparse), and salt hay(Spartina patens, sparse and in upland); a large patch of Rugosa rose (Rosa rugosa); and some bayberry(Morella pensylvanica) [Exhibit 1, Photos]. The southern third of the site contains patchy shrubs, including bayberry and beach plum (Prunus maritima); and patchy trees including Eastern red-cedar (Juniperus virginiana) and post oak (Quercus stellata). Herbaceous vegetation in the southern third of the site is sparse, mainly coastal panicgrass. Along the road edge, non-native and invasive species such as black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) and autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellate) mix with post oak and eastern red-cedar. Little blue stem (Schizachyrium scoparium) is also present along the road edge. Existing Dune Conditions Site topography was utilized for mapping of dune features by the surveyor. The location of the crest of dune/beach ridge is indicated as coincident to the highest recorded elevations,moving landward from the beach area, prior to sloping downward. The location of the landward toe of the dunelbeach ridge was developed from a combination of following the methodology of the Bombara(adjacent west) application, as well as the grades and vegetation spanning between the two adjacent developed properties. Beach and Dune Change Over Time The shoreline along North Sea Drive is stable. Aerial photographs were utilized to digitize the dry beach in 1957, 1971, 1994, 2013 (post-Sandy), and 2020 (Exhibit 2, Aerial Timeline). As demonstrated by aerials going back 65 years, the beach is stable, with fluctuations of 5-15 feet between 1957 and 1994. The beach was at its narrowest in 2013, following Superstorm Sandy in October 2012, and has accreted 40-65 feet in the vicinity of the subject property since 2013. Based on 2020 aerials and the site survey,the dry beach area is currently at its widest since 1957. In addition to dry shoreline, the general limit of dune vegetation was digitize from aerial photographs in 1957, 1971, 1994, 2013, and 2020 (Exhibit 3, Vegetated Dune Limit). The vegetated dune has actually Project Narrative 12/2/2022 1925 North Sea Drive,Southold 2/3 d expanded seaward (i.e. north) 50-57 feet at the subject property since 1957. Similar to the dry shoreline, the vegetated dune is currently at its widest/most seaward since 1957. Based on this analysis, the site at 1925 North Sea Drive is stable, with no significant coastal erosion occurring to the beach or dune in the past 65 years for which this analysis was performed.North Sea Drive has undergone residential development along its length during this time;.residential development has not affected the beach and dune system, as evidenced by the analysis performed. Development of the subject property, preserving 23,100± SF of vegetated dune and the entire beach, is therefore not anticipated to negatively impact these protective features. Alternatives Considered Alternatives considered include No Action and construction of alternate structure design,sizes,and layout. No Action does not achieve the goal of the project to provide a single family residence for the owner, and was therefore dismissed. There have been several iterations of site layouts presented for this project, including alternative sizes and configurations of the various structures, locating the structures seaward, and proposing a catwalk and gazebo over the dune. Based on analysis and feedback received from the Town of Southold, the dwelling was reconfigured and relocated as far landward as possible to maximize wetland and dune setbacks and to maximize preservation of natural habitat. The catwalk and gazebo was also removed for protection of the existing natural dune. Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures Proposed to Reduce Impacts Mitigation measures proposed with this project include preservation of an approximately 200-foot wide buffer as natural beach and dune habitat,planting of disturbed areas with native vegetation, installation of an UA OWTS to reduce nitrogen loading to groundwater and surface waters, and installation of a stormwater management system to treat and store runoff prior to discharge to Long Island Sound. As a result of these changes to the project design and proposed mitigation and protection measures, there are no impacts anticipated to adjacent properties. Runoff will be contained onsite with the stormwater management system. Adjacent properties will be screened with native vegetation in accordance with the Native Planting Plan. Proposed development is in line with or landward of the line of development for the north side of North Sea Drive, including the adjacent properties. The Town of Southold has documented shorebird nesting between McCabe's Beach and Kenny's Beach, where this stretch includes the beach on and north of the site. Specifically, the Town has documented piping plovers (Charadrius melodus) nesting on this stretch of beach; plovers prefer to nest on the unvegetated beach landward of mean high water during the months of April—August. Due to the existing residential development along this stretch of North Sea Drive, the landward design of this residence proposed in line with or landward of the existing development and> 100 feet landward of their preferred beach habitat, and the proposed natural buffer,there are no impacts anticipated to nesting plovers or their preferred beach habitat. Development is proposed approximately 40 feet landward of the dune crest, and will impact existing vegetation on the back dune. However, impacts are minimized by project design, which maximizes preservation of natural areas and proposes native.vegetation in areas of disturbance. As a result of these design and preservation features, impacts on the function of the dune as a protective feature are not anticipated. Project Narrative 12/2/2022 1925 North Sea Drive,Southold 3/3 MKS Realty LLC — Southold Exhibit l 1925 North Sea Drive I SCTM#1000-54-4-20 Site photos taken 11/2/2002 by Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. 4 � .,,P,* •o ,( r y •. t y y / ,, SII' �_: � � .. _ ii• _ �f✓ r:; •+Me guy,,, �� i, '- {f"�¢ i?yrr i 9t � 4, _ # ��. z'• ;.� `� k. mot' v ►n'� 4 7a5" 5�. vy. _ ac .w -}., i:�, F.�e E NO s n +;Y '.Ii7Crs sJ ?., MKS Realty LLC — Southold Exhibit l 1925 North Sea Drive I SCTM#1000-54-4-20 Site photos taken 11/2/2002 by Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. • 40 e'� R v S { e �i:- '�I�c''fit�¢ .• � s �!.^ ti.'+� Q , �._ i ...d. `: � y v'; � ��,.l: `�� uppR r S� a? ��,:,,� A A'� �� 3``�Yb��yl � ��,by ,�'R� -�,. k.; •+ ,�+Z'' _ C �J=R Fr. I r a y f� MKS Realty LLC — Southold Exhibit ] 1925 North Sea Drive I SCTM#1000-54-4-20 Site photos taken 11/2/2002 by Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. N. — — r W .. WI �-�►"Ot,� y 'dw ♦ �,t'Ssa ^ v� _. rY,y4�°�'�firt�j#�„r' + � 'M, ,�� .4r ..k f � ��� .� wz.'Lr - W ..rr y3'• _ .' i�., w. 1 a ,Y', r,_-: b �wx' '>. Yy'r�.t�y ''w pd vWi-- - f.- ? �!]�., •,;. "M r sem', r �'�, 9� se -� t„ ��+'46'Rf'+ - � SITE . . LM .011 Edge of Dry Shoreline 1957 1971 .. ` 1994 = --- 2013 2020 1957 and 1971 aerials from USGS Earth Explorer. 1994,2013,and 2020 aerials from NYSGIS Clearinghouse. 2 Prepared By: Land Use Ecological Services,Inc. Project:DRY SHORELINE CHANGE 1 in=150 ftT TS 570 Expressway Drive South,Suite 2F For: MKS Realty,LLC and L t! Medford,NY 11763 At: 1925 North Sea Dr.,Southold,NY 0 50 100 200 SCTM #1000-54-4-20 ft Date: 12/2/2022 Revised: Scale:As Noted Exhibit 2 _. ---- SITE r � t-' 0 0 sirsMtsr ,-.•r.-. 14 •+ v 2M�3 Iti 4' � q Limit of Vegetated Dune n 1957 1971 1994 � ✓� �� 2013 • 44' ,.., �— 2020 1957 and 1971 aerials from USGS Earth Explorer. 1994,2013,and 2020 aerials from NYSGIS Cleannghouse. 2 Prepared By: Land Use Ecological Services,Inc. Project:VEGETATED DUNE LIMIT 1 in=150 ft 570 Expressway Drive South,Suite 2F For: MKS Realty,LLC Landuse s Medford,NY 11763 At: 1925 North Sea Dr.,Southold,NY 0 50 100 200 SCTM #1000-54-4-20 ft Date: 12/2/2022 Revised: Scale:As Noted Exhibit 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD RE: MKS REALTY, LLC 1925 NORTH SEA DRIVE, SOUTHOLD 1000-54.-4-20 Patricia C. Moore 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 (631) 765-4330 FILED : SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 01/13/2023 05 :29 P INDEX NO. 601105/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/13/2023 EXHIBIT A BOARD OF TRUSTEES ' DECISION 12/14/22 Y (FILED : SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 01/132023 05 :29 PN INDEX NO. 601105/2023' NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF; 01/13/2023 Glenn Goldsmith,President C�`1oF S 01 Town Hall Annex A.Nicholas Krupski,Vice President 'W P.O. Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Eric Sepenoski Southold,New York 11971 Liz Gillooly G Telephone(631)765-1892 Elizabeth Peeples ::5"' Fax(631) 765-6641 equoi BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 27, 2022 Tom Wolpert Young &Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: MKS REALTY, LLC 1925 NORTH SEA DRIVE, SOUTHOLD SCTM# 1000-54-4-20 Dear Mr. Wolpert: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, December 14, 2022 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Young &Young on behalf of MKS REALTY, LLC applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, and Chapter 111 of the Southold Town Code, Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas, application dated November 18, 2021, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator recommended that the proposed applications be found Inconsistent with the LWRP, and specifically Inconsistent with the following coastal policies: Policy 4 - Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion, 1. Avoid development other than water-dependent uses in coastal hazard areas. Locate new development which is not water-dependent as far away from coastal hazard areas as practical. ;! FILED : SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 01/13/20,23 05 : 29 P INDEX NO. 601105/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2. RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/13/2023 ` 2 a. NO DEVELOPMENT is pennitted in natural,protective feature areas, except as specifically allowed under the relevant portions of_6:NYCRR 505.8. b. Avoid hazards by siting structures to maximize the distance from Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas. 1. THE ENTIRE PARCEL IS LOCATED 1N THE COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREA and the primary dune, a natural protective feature. No new development Is permitted on a primary dune. 2. The entire structure is located within a VE El 13 flood zone. VE coastal areas are subject to high-velocity water including waves, defined by the one percent annual chance flood and wave effects three feet or greater. This means that the flood has a one percent chance of being met or exceeded in any given year. 3. The parcel and any development on the parcel will be adversely impacted by sea level rise over time. Policy 4.2 Protect,and restore natural protective features, Maximize the protective capabilities of natural protective features by avoiding alteration or interference with shorelines in a natural condition; and WHEREAS, On October 17, 2007, a=site.visit of the area was-conducted_by representatives of the Trustees, the LWRP coordinator, and NYS DEC Environmental Specialist who collectively confirmed.that the actions proposed on a neighboring parcel, more landward than the proposed.actions herein, were entirely located seaward of the CEHA line and within a primary dune; and WHEREAS, the Conservation Advisory Council resolved to NOT support the application, as the proposed setbacks are too close to the wetland boundary within the primary and secondary dune, and within a flood zone. They noted the environmentally sensitive area, and any development of the property would deplete the natural habitat. WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on August 17, 2022 and December 14, 2022, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members_have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application,'and, FILED : SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 01/1372023 05-:29! Pll .INDEX NO: 601105/2023\. NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/13/2023 3 WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the structure, as applied for does not comply with the standards set forth in Southold Town Code Chapter 275-12A: Adversely affect the wetlands of,the Town; B. Cause damage from erosion, turbidity or siltation, D. Adversely affect fish, shellfish or other beneficial marine,organisms, aquatic�wildlife and vegetation or the natural habitat thereof; E. Increase the danger of flood and storm-fide damage; H. Weaken or undermine the lateral support of other lands in the vicinity; I. Otherwise adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the Town;and J: Adversely affect the aesthetic value of the wetland°and aidjacent areas; and WHEREAS, some of the proposed structure, as applied for, is located in;aprimary dune area with the proposed deck and proposed pool encroaching seaward of the proposed dwelling into an environmentally sensitive area valuable"to,the people of,the Town of Soutfibld., and as applied for does not comply with: 111-9 Issuance tof-Permit.. A'coastal erosion mdriagement penrff will,be issued only with a1lhdin'gZby,the Administrator that the proposed regulated activity: A.- Is reasonable`and necessary, considering reasonable alternatives to the proposed activity and the extent to which the proposed activity requires-a shoreline location; B: Isnot likely to,cause-a measurable increase in erosion at the proposed site and at other locations. C. Prevents, if possible, or minimizes adverse effects on natural protective features and their functions and protective values, existing erosion-protection structures and natural resources;'and, 111-13. Dune Area A. Jn primary dune areas: (9) Excavating, gradiing.ormining,of primary dunes is prohibited, (2) Clean sand of a compatible type and size is the only material which may be deposited. Any deposition requires a coastal erosion management permit, (3) All depositions must-be`vegetatively stabilized using species tolerant of the.conditions at the site and must be placed so as to,increase the.size of-or restore; a dune or dune area, (4)Active bird nesting'and breeding,areas must riot be disturbed; unless such disturbance is pursuant to a,specific wildlife management activity approved, in writing, by the Department, (5) Nonmajor additions to existing structure's are allowed on primary dunes pursuant to a coastal erosion management permit and subject to permit conditions concerning the location, design and potential impacts of the structure on'the primary dune; (6) Stone revetments or other erosion protection structures compatible with primary dunes will onlybe allowed at the waterward toe of primary dunes and must not interfere with the exchange of sand between primary dunes- and their fronting beaches, and WHEREAS, the project,'as applied for,'is not permitted under Chapter 111 insofar as it is located in a primary dune area; and WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing on August 17, 2022, the owner of that neighboring parcel, Robert Bombara, of 1725 North Sea Drive, testified that the Trustees must follow precedence which established, in a prior application before Trustees, during the application process and appeal before the Southold Town Board, through testimony taken before the Board, the location of the primary dune in this particular area, and no structure shall be located seaward of the primary dune line; and ✓�FILED : SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 01/13/2023 05 : 29 P INDEX NO. 601105/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/13/2023 4 WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the request, as applied for, will have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, and, adversely weaken or undermine the lateral support of other lands in the vicinity NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that for foregoing reasons, and because the proposed action is located within the coastal erosion hazard area and in a primary dune area, and because the proposed action is not permitted in such areas pursuant to Chapters 275 and 111 of the Town Code, that the Trustees deem the proposed project to be impermissible under Chapter 275 and Chapter 11.1, and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that for the foregoing reasons, the Board of Trustees DENIES the Wetland and Coastal Erosion Permit application of MKS REALTY, LLC to construct a two- story 3,053 sf footprint dwelling with garage; a proposed 21'10"x 11'9" (253.5 sf) seaward bedroom balcony with railing system; a proposed 10'4"x 20'2" (191.7 so mezzanine level bedroom balcony & railing system; a privacy screen wall along the west side, and a 6'wide spiral staircase to ground; a 1,484 sf raised deck with a 448 sf pool on seaward side, privacy screening along portion of east side, a 3'9"wide stairs with railings to ground to west, and a 3'6" stairs with railing to ground to east; proposed 10' wide bar/grill area on pool deck; 513 sf of non-pervious front entry stairs; proposed 3,183 sf of stone blend driveway; 1,200 gallon underground propane tank, new I/A OWTS sanitary system, ie. one (1) 500 gallon wastewater treatment unit and four (4) 8.51 by 2' effect. depth sanitary leaching galleys; public water service connection; new storm water control structures for roof runoff and driveway runoff; approximately 480 cy of clean material from the excavated areas will be used to fill the site to the proposed grades; and all mechanical equipment (ie. A/C unit)to be located above the second- story structure; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by R. Shatarah Consulting Engineers, P.C., last dated October 11, 2022. This determination should not be considered a determination made for any other Department or Agency, which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. Very truly yours, &k.1— 4&1-1,�1 Glenn Goldsmith, President Board of Trustees GG/dd ZONING INFORMATION PROPOSED PLOT PLAN ZONING CALCULATIONS L O N G I S L A N D S O U N D SITE PLAN LEGEND 1 IN ACCORDANCE W/280 ATTACHMENT 3-BULK SCHEDULE FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS DISTRICT R-40 REQUIRED SECTION TOTAL PROVIDED THE LINE ALONG APPROXIMATE PROPOSED BUILDING LOT SIZE 40,000 S.F. 280 ATCH 1:1 58,936.00 S.F. CONFORMS TEST HOLE HIGH WATER MARK AS LOCATED LOT WIDTH 150.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 200.00 FT. CONFORMS Y US ON 11/25/20 SILT FENCE LOCATION R SHATARAH LOT DEPTH 175.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 296.57 FT. CONFORMS BY McDONALD GEOSCIENCE B FRONT YARD 50.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 38.90 FT. NON-CONFORMS DATE: 05/11/06 AVERAGE FRONT YARD SETBACK 38.90 FT. 38.90 FT. CONFORMS EL=6.45' O.O' - - - - - LIMIT LINE O F WORK CONSULTING ENGINEERS,P.C. TURNPIKE SIDE YARD 15.00 FT 280 ATCH 3:1 16.00 FT. CONFORMS PALE BROWN N40028'59i 200.04' 6500 JERICHO SUITE 1W AGGREGATE SIDE YARD 35.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 53.83 FT. CONFORMS FINE TO11791 REAR YARD 50.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 225.00 FT. CONFORMS COARSE SYO516) 31 4687 TEL: (516) 731-4687 SAND FAX: (516) 796-2744 MAXIMUM PERMITTED DIMENSIONS: (SW) RUDOLPH@RscE-Pc.coM RUDOLPH S. SHATARAH, P.E. LOT COVERAGE 20% (11 ,787.20 S.F.) 280 ATCH 3:1 7.9% (4,680.9 FT.) CONFORMS GW=1.65' 4.8' ----- _--- _ WWW.RSCE-PC.COM ----------------------- BUILDING HEIGHT 35.00 FT. 280 ATCH 3:1 35.00 FT. CONFORMS WATER IN -- \- NUMBER OF STORIES 2 1/2 280 ATCH 3:1 2 CONFORMS PALE BROWN FINE TO COARSE 01 0 FIRST FLOOR AREA: T FLOOR 2,401.1 S.F. SAND O PROPOSED FIRS ' PROPOSED FRONT ENTRANCE IMPERVIOUS 498.1 S.F. (S� -a- BEACH 0 N PROPOSED GARAGE 591.6 S.F. 11 .0' --- ---- --- - _ - -----------4 --_- W L PROP. FIRST FLOOR EXT. DECK 1,284.9 S.F. PROP. POOL 448.0 S.F. - - -- C FLOOD BOUNDARY LINE 9 X MEZZANINE FLOOR AREA: AS SCALED FROM FLOOD - = 2) W PROPOSED MASTER BEDROOM 676.5 S.F. ZONE VE(EL-16) 0 0 INSURANCE RATE MAP �� , � .� SECOND FLOOR AREA: 2,219.5 S.F. ZONE VE(EL-13) ----------- 0 THESE PLANS ARE THE INSTRUMENT OF COMPLETE FLOOR AREA TOTAL 5,888.7 S.F. SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF MN THE ENGINEER. INFRINGEMENT WILL BE EDGE OF BEACH GRASS 5 LOT COVERAGE - BREAKDOWN 3PROSECUTED. IT IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209.2 < (D OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DWELLING (WOOD FRAME) 2,449.9 S.F. 3 O O LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEY RAISED DECK 1 ,284.9 S.F. m ARE ACTING UNDER DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER TO 448.0 S.F. s9 --------- s sr 6 ALTER ANY ITEM IN ANY WAY. IF ANY POOL � � _ FRONT ENTRY STEP SYSTEM 498.1 S.F. s _-~ �s s° +� ° �\\�- s � ITEM BEARING THE SEAL OF AN GRAVEL DRIVEWAY (PREVIOUS) + S.F. O ENGINEER IS ALTERED, THE ALTERING S. � ENGINEER SHALL AFFIX HIS SEAL AND A NOTATION ALTERED BY", FOLLOWED BY �' °° 6 6 �-`S6 ---------------- °O M HIS SIGNATURE AND DATE OF SUCH `� --- -- ---- PROPOSED 4' WIDE PATH SOF THE ALON TERATIOND A PSCIFIC HALL BE NOTED. 680.9 X--- ------ ----------------__ SITED THRU AREA, OF MIN. LOT COVERAGE TOTAL (7.9 0) 4, --- - .� P'f O 69 - 7 X LOT AREA 58,936.00 S.F. 0 x--`�_____ s '� - ------ s VEGETATION. Im AMOUNT OF FILL REQUIRED 470.00 CY. O O .,�o - - 8 9� 6� N ENTIRE SUBJECT LOT IS I FILL TO BE CLEAN BANK-RUN SAND AND GRAVEL FROM APPROVED UPLAND SITE) 't � x s _A rt ESTABLISHED AND ( 3 1 x �9s - % ° MAINTAINED AS A C �O� BEACH GRASS 's 9 "NON-DISTURBANCE BUFFER" BUILDING AREA: (� - FIRST FLOOR 2,401.1 S.F. 3 '�� AREA WITH A PROPOSED 4' MASTER SUITE FLOOR 676.5 S.F. � x 9 > 8 WIDE ACCESS PATH THRU 2 219.5 S.F. r -� - --- THE "NON-DISTURBANCE ' SECOND FLOOR � •t M �,P � x BUFFER" AS INDICATED. SCHEDULE FOR OPEN SPACE AS PER 280 ATTACHMENT 6 s sj `% SIZE OF LOT <15 AC V��58,936.00 1.35 AC CONFORMS �� a POOL EQUIPMENT MINIMUM OPEN SPACE 20% 000.0 S.F. CONFORMS x x IQ x N CREST OF DUNE/BEACH RIDGE LOCATED UNDER DECK MINIMUM SET BACK 30 000.0 FT. CONFORMS N ' �6 s x-0 (GROUND LEVEL) MINIMUM BUFFER 20 000.0 FT. CONFORMS �6 DASHED LINE OF to TT f0 11 O.H. ABOVE. 0 x , FLOOD INSURANCE RATE PANEL No. 36103CO154H LAST UPDATED. 9.25.2009 x x �9 0 "'�r 9, o LIMIT OF `�s� x �9SUBJECT LOT: 1925 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHOLD PROPOSED FILL 6 X ��� ° RESIDENTIAL BACKUP0 SECTION: 54 BLOCK: 04 LOT(S): 227 ( Y) r X LANDWARD LIMIT OF JAPPROX. 470 C 1 �° DUNE/BEACH RIDGE GENERATOR LOCATED oZONING: RESIDENCE 'R-40' DISTRICT 1000 9�- **4 ' N ,, UNDER DECK o Y PIER LINE IN ACCORDANCE W/BD. 9 �, +�'� �� m Z NOTES OF TRUSTEES (DECK SPACE) 6 x `�,� (� x z u� J • ALL ZONING REFERENCES PER ZONING CODE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 9 .n 0 ~ PIER LINE IN ACCORDANCE W/BD. s s�EPsTG GR- O � LL • THE UNDISTURBED PORTION OF THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AS A UNDISTURBED BUFFER. �..•,C` 6 x 32.7 40 EXISTING BUFFER TO CO OF TRUSTEES (LIVING ... ._ 22.0 16•x' REMAIN. CO W ,.� s 0 Q o (SEC. 275-2.A) +,6 STEPST*GRHDE +17.93 o �-- RAISED DECK _ (SEC. 275-11 .C.2.C.1 .C) + s+1o.3 + 37.8 x W T U) r- INCLUDED DWELLINGS WITHIN 500' EAST & WEST OF SUBJECT LOT `� 2°° x O < o (� � POOL QT- � � ADJACENT LOT COVERAGE ANALYSIS TABLE ZONE VE (EL-13) �0° •g ,,.2s x 20.5 + 5.8 22.0 x x °s N PROPOSED POOL W T 61 r r M - s °.s x _ x Q Q } = Q LIJ F.A.R.% LOT - - _ _ _ _ _�_ _ _ ,�.° -- - - - - PR`OP. DWELLtNi -.. -- -- - -�- I - - _ _ � PROVIDE ACCESS TO _ LU z (- ADDRESS SECTION/BLK./LOT LOT SIZE DWELLING DECKS/PORTICO TOTAL COVERAGE REMARKS L 12) 01 +10.5 s4 m +8.5 a N (F.F. EL.:18.0) °S �� POOL DRAIN FOR (n = o p x 0 4S6PDERSURVEY ,7.0 2.3 ,2.4 , MAINTENANCE. W 2325 N. SEA DR., SOUTHOLD N.Y. 1000 - 54-04-.24 26,676.1 2,607.5 904.3 3,511.8 13.2% c� S CID f °C O LL. ~ n W 01 °,3.5 35 0.3 +74 /1 O Z O 2225 N. SEA DR., SOUTHOLD N.Y. 1000- 54-04-23 21,332.0 1,176.0 1,170.0 2,346.0 10.9% m 78 22.2 0 ,7 '7 JF� FLOOD BOUNDARY LINE AS : z 1 z z O 17.93 Lo D 2125 N. SEA DR., SOUTHOLD N.Y. 1000- 54-04-22 19,950.0 1,299.18 930.5 2,229.7 11.1% o O C 1B0 + +e.5o WALL SCALED FROM FLOOD W rn O O O m x owls +10. 5 9 s INSURANCE RATE MAP Z 2025 N. SEA DR., SOUTHOLD N.Y. 1000- 54 -04'-21 23,000.0 1,311.8 442.2 1,754.0 7.6% PRINT 12/2 SURVEY ,� V +101.5 `� DIS x s � w x 8FT. DIA. x 4FT. DRAWING z y PROJECT: � 1925 N. SEA DR., SOUTHOLD N.Y. 10001- 54-04-20 58,936.0 2,449.9 2,231.0 4,680.9 7.9% SUBJECT LOT M < +10.3 10 �A x 6� v DEEP SWIMMING IPOOL NAME a AVERAGE FRONT YARD m N +7. 8 1725 N. SEA DR., SOUTHOLD N.Y. 1000- 54- 04- 19 24,879.0 1,159.0 568.0 1,727.0 6.9% m I 01 m x BACKWASH SYSTEM. SETBACK (EST. BY Z < O 9 + 6----- . +7, LF#2 _� D CD REVISIONS 1625 N. SEA DR., SOUTHOLD N.Y. 1000- 54- 04 ' 18 26,350.0 2,498.0 1,283.0 3,781.0 14.3% ADJACENT HOMES) M N � Z e x b 7 7.3 a M W T-, ss _ PROPOSED 1200 GAL. # DATE REVISIONS ° AS PER SURVEY D m S / + X v l a + UNDERGROUND 7/28/22 REVISED PER SURVEYOR 1525 N. SEA DR., SOUTHOLD N.Y. 1000-54- 04 - 17 25,236.0 1,342.0 998.0 2,340.0 9.2/0 8/11/88 6 M 7.5 6 X 8 + 6 ss PRO PANE TANK 8/02/22 REVISED PER COMMENTS 1425 N. SEA DR., SOUTHOLD N.Y. 1000- 54 -04- 16 25,748.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A VACANT LOT y 775' TO KEN N EY'S00AD 7 +7.4 6 --- ? -+ 7 + 8 x PROPOSED GRAVE 10/4/22 RESUB.TO BD.TRUSTEES 1325 N. SEA DR., SOUTHOLD N.Y. 1000 54- 04- 15.3 25,748.5 1,920.0 1,908.0 3,828.0 14.5% AS PER SURVEY -_- 10/1122 RESUB.TO BD.TRUSTEES DRIVIEVi 12/1922 ADJ.LOT COVERAGE TABLE 9/03/86 EDGE OF EXISTING 7 y s9 S o i flat 6 ��_ 7.5 s 2OO■ O s �,�� >T �6 x 7 -- PAVEMENT � � 'so EDGE OF EXISTING LONG ISLAND SOUND +7.2 �,o EOP +7.25 ------- - PAVEMENT IATEI 5 w. °N°^°5ONMAe js js w s� s Q so EXISTING UNDERGROUND ea By U5°NMAIK A5 E�/xu/io NIO 28' WATER MAIN � 59"E 20004' .� .� N O R T H S E A D R I V E s PROJECT LIMITING SILT FENCE ALONG LIMIT OF g CLEARING, GRADING AND ISSUE ZONE VE(A-Ib) weiuup5 U5°IATEb 10 - GROUND DISTURBANCE. DATE COMMENT ONE VE(R-13) 6/10/21 PROGRESS PRINT 1/14/22 REVISED PER COMMENT LOT#:(7 PROPOSED SITE PLAN LOT#:18 N LOT#:24 PARKING LOT LOT#:15.3 LOT#:21 LOT#:22 LOT#:23 SCALE 1" = 20'-0" VACANT LOT#:16 � LOT#:19 SUBJECT LOT#:20 PROJECT No. 21-350-00 DATE: 05-08-21 a - DRAWN BY: KJS a � _ o N o m (n 0 0 0 0 CHECKED BY: O M � �F M MLO d' .... -- SCALE: AS SHOWN 48.4'AVERAGE FRONT YARD SETBACK 500'EAST&WEST OF THE SUBJECT LOT NORTH SEA DRIVE NOTE FO CONTRACTOR: ALL TRADES ARE REQUIRED TO REVIEW, REFER TO AND BE FAMILIAR WITH THE ENTIRE DRAWING SET AND PROJECT MANUAL (v.....) °a, PACKAGE PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK,ANY DISCREPANCIES DUE TO A LACK OF CROSS-TRADE COORDINATION WITH THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT SET WILL BE REPAIRED, REPLACED OR RE-INSTALLED AT THAT CONTRACTOR'S SOLE EXPENSE. o 1♦ OW !� +11111°I!:'•r .►'rg11.111111°•1111�1`w _ •, 1111 11 rq�� 1r11w�n1•,► 11 IIIc 1111 11 1♦111�cy�.• 11111°111°1II°141r11r1 11°111 f1i�114g11g1�w1111♦°111411°1II°141°Q�°IIr�f1 • • • -• • - • . -• i - • 441�44144�14441i°14g1�%�C•�I�i���r:wc�r vi-v�,,•1•a��'.��4♦1�%114��A �:��•°�,��44g14♦°�1144f141f4�1.4�•"41%`I: �.r,f�Ig1�1:1�gwowd 11114114q•-•g14,6, f-r•�1�t?�►'ISIwq�/►yiii�lw�•,�IfJ♦gy�llgq��•I�a°••1•i.-g,- 1�4i1glfig1141♦4�IIi IIIS1.1o1-0WAR IggIw1�1♦Ilgq/1♦IIIg111g111IIIg1i�W♦11-1`•14g11q�'f1 jljq♦IgIfIg111°jIg111_WAg111g11�q1 j�JIM��,p`-lt111�1� • • • -• - • . -• • ��11•j1•41y�f°41111>;14411111CItO°111f1�41g11g1•Ih����qt�41��c1a=�A1Z11�1!V4���•®q��1�11ti�1ir��1°q1••°II°II�1II/'°X11°111 - i • • . - - 1♦Ii.Ir.,._r;�r1•�t1°�► 1•Iiq�.:..1♦1�Area of NaturalrVe etatioHgomemain•11•/11/1f°IIi°I� t 1 • c ►• IIA • IQ► •. ►. t.., . �� g • 1. • • 1�'�►skprs�zsT�9F1��•1�1=w=i 111181=:.!°IIIr11°141GIIIIi��1=r1�ai0°�I�e31111�11AI1♦IrWAig116.1'tC41;41'11� t I '-•IV ,y�;. 1.1 �.► 11 i►♦ 11 fi ♦ 11 ♦ 11 ► ♦ • • i 1/111. 1Iq•Igfq j.en,Igf• w. • lr,IfA w a j11rq�11♦ 1,•r�gglgqliqqli�♦•♦ • • 14gIgIGIg1♦ggq�Oq�p •ai•I ;Iq •j • ; pl►.t f♦�1��111 vTL • !°1411 Beach ass ° j 11 4 G q s Iw • 4 Q ! T ♦ f • • •pt if f 1 II 4 1 Ij ► ♦ ��11 aq 14 �1 fi• 11 11♦�q e'i . • e ♦ # 11 •f <+ f1 ♦ 1: —rIf I�IIi�111�« 9 I�jlf °♦4114!1 OW ER�rf'141i1,, . . • 111 • 1a= If1111� q,i11q♦4q •q Beach pea ♦ ,1111 r • •11• ♦ ♦ f1 Ij 1 �d 1111♦°1114����iiiIIwItIPq llf��1� ♦18111°II • i • • - . - • - r►14 11111118..1 MO. 1 •11111 1 $►48gJlg11q11♦q111 Rugosa rose I�jj:l:�t`L��T.� MAP,-1W " . • 1 • Iw 1 4i •e is ta.Ifi♦1� 1 ♦ ♦ - - ► 1.!111••1 11 11 •e;.11 1 w4 11♦ �, ♦=gq♦..glq•Iq 1i, • ♦ gY1m,OWN i IIigID11, • • 1 - 1. 1 1 - . ' - 1 1•I 1♦IIgIq 4!•Iier 14 • 4ys3 z� ♦ •i .•q ♦ Ii Coastal anis rass! Q a �1 .. '•i1•i°�•is"Ii11G°I♦11! foe ♦ -'141♦'�i14'•si°I i°I� P 9/1�f 418°:!4,11Ir► 'MM�SI 1° °♦.1/ - 1 • • ♦ 1♦ Iq w• ♦ 1♦ q• i o' ..,� 1 ♦ 11 •1 • Northern ba ber, �. i• ,t 7 ♦1.44•°i1+e`Ct'/s;!t��1••r1i°q11°4�s 14 4 ,•�•-r„'�►11114111•''I/f4g1��1'' �ryaf�n,j� ►r':t,Ig4 rs , • • � p 1 Q • it M � 1�� ♦•q♦11♦1.4y ,'- &ANA0,11IM �•� •gllglq QIIIq,I►iEastern redGedarrl; l;i�i:,•/C�.l.,?;S� q � .,• • 1 - . - • • — Ijglp�t,,1!f11r11.A 11111 ♦ • ij ►gt,11. 11111111 t1 •+r ••t•4�+ 1r� 4j if' I,h.:C11a�•n �ll�•1J3.)v'��'7111•sIg14 1 , i•�If°Iifglif•�1I/yf��IBIaGk.cherry,�ag11 •1♦11 1•g14�♦ 1`411 ty a ;.r►1•q�Ij1.11111•�r�1 11 1111.11 1111111 a1�• I ♦I 111♦1 11.1► 1 41 1 1s ?i1+1►tBe+M. L� gPIIg11 111.111 f 1 ►•f 111♦Ig11g11♦fitfll!=II�j1 T�IPej�11 •1 •11•Wa•° 0 1 • 1 1 - 1 1 1. " 1 1 1 • 1 11q °4i°It s�11°—mf11��1if111�°1°ISA/Ii' 1 � �4t I%1♦44�14414441 �,i°I`4�1141♦i;'EG �41, a°I41114�4i't� 1 - 1. - • 1- - !•q'Iig1ir11 r 11 .q of ` 1 :q 'tp • IIQi••°a111•°II° ir►144�Iifg1 > =I�Iflligfivgl 4�rA1 ! 14 ' �fr1�11.4 f11gIglg4qlr;Iif-1• �fE�!1►j111111 ♦+JIIr 1�� - _ ♦ 11 /1 11 1111 111 c!r ♦ !t ,--p 11 • • • 111111i►111 • flQt.r�t�_ 5� -.. II =L�i • rj111111rq•111111/11�=;tip„ � � ! i ItjI1��CCIf 11141 TeI / I' I / I • • • " 1 f 11 • • 11. IC '' a !� b � � A Iw°I�1li p ip11g11 ►1oj11 •°I Ir°IIF•�11•Ir•Ci 1, SIv <! P 1•Ig1.11.111f11►11 1 ,11 11��1111n.i.a111r911 11411 • # 11 111♦ 11 1111 11 I,r 1 . . • 1111 1 << 11 11 • �,$ 11 I�` M fj rP111 ♦ 11 1.1 I • I 1 I 1 1. ' • / / / I / I / I / 1 / // /1 iiq f•1` RA 4FW!Ifg11� ' • 1'♦ s1yAigi ;'i' '1111.gilgq•♦fg1•qMla110q11q1�1481 �r,�gl=g4ili ►®i°I*�1. 411 ' 4 Ii.t,1'1.1�• '•Ii+t11v•1 1'�►! /ifs11•MIS 11.111 1.11.11 ♦ 1i 1 1 12 MNIfo O♦Ie.-yff r,., X11 / 1 ♦ 1 •r' c�1.11pi11•IIi°I♦°1.111°1.111°Ii° 1° /' 1 • 1 - 1 : • .. w ! • Ii /v. S a1 •1111 :-�i1f1 *i"1+ gIi111f1!ni11ii11ii♦1♦i1i♦1°1111.111♦41♦•�1 2• 11 i♦♦4i►4?: O t r • qa w ! •• 1,.,1 q I IIi q1 ;• qIi IIi1♦i111 111111 1°4 1°IIi° - - f t.. ► Ir•. G1411.t ri41•aA%...�t11`III II�Iq/11j1�111�11j1111111gAf11j 11 f• 1 ' - 1 I I I 1 I I I / /' 1 FIs'® "1'a��11 �Yliw•;Ifw ~�IIIcf1► 111f1111�11��9111►IIi"4x11°411°�114111'L':-� g1�111�1e y '•'►t�'„ •'°a 11 a11IgJi1•f+�Igf1� ,,.K•41qu�ifa .r.111j11111°ba11111111rf111°1111111114111gt 1 rt`�Ig111111�i • • 1 1 ' 1 1. - • i 1 . - • - 1 1 p rlti:OlY '111 t'11 <-11�Y'+r 1��l•11 fiC1a �1 ♦•• •1,•�1♦1/1q�111111 11♦111`'�•lly�.rtrR1•1°Ihr1/r r._ d1���,.��_��°14 �r_.. IS.r11° 1 IGS_#t�A��`��►1�1�. 1►_II�_I��1i►�w��A w�i<:_ Rc.,.!1-C'.:<.I�c'f I ME - _ !t •r e1 _ _ `��®�1►1. � - r-.. - X11 � • • • • s - Ecological Services, Inc. , • • 1 • �pf SO(/} OFFICE LOCATION: �* MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O.Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 ' ° �. Southold,NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold,NY 11971 Q �p Telephone: 631765-1938 s ..r. LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Glenn Goldsmith, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, AICP LWRP Coordinator Date: August 9, 2022 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for MKS REALTY, LLC SCTM# 1000-54-4-20 Young & Young on behalf of MKS REALTY, LLC requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to construct a two-story 2,445sq.ft. footprint dwelling with garage; a proposed 21'10"x11'9" (253.5sq.ft.) seaward bedroom balcony with railing system; a proposed 10'4"x20'2" (191.7sq.ft.) mezzanine level bedroom balcony, railing system, a privacy screen wall along west side, and a 6' wide spiral staircase to ground; a 1,218.8sq.ft. elevated deck with a 522sq.ft. pool on seaward side, privacy screening along portion of east side, a 3'9"wide stairs with railings to ground to west and a 3'6" stairs with railings to ground to east; proposed 10'wide bar/grill area on pool deck; seaward of pool to the east off pool patio, a proposed 203.6sq.ft. elevated (ranging from±7.5'to 10' above natural grade) catwalk leading to a 127.9sq.ft. open air gazebo with flat roof over, 3'6"wide stairs with railings to ground, and 110.6sq.ft. storage area under gazebo; proposed 663sq.ft. of non- pervious front entry stairs; proposed 4,095sq.ft. of stone blend driveway; proposed 1,200 gallon underground propane tank; new I/A OWTS sanitary system, i.e. one (1) 500 gallon wastewater treatment unit and six (6) 8.5' long by 2'effect. depth sanitary leaching galleys; public water service connection;,new storm water control structures for roof runoff and driveway runoff; approximately 690 cubic yards of clean material from the excavated areas will be used to fill the site to the proposed grades; and all mechanical equipment (i.e.A/C unit), to be located above the second- story structure. Located: 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold. SCTM#1000-54-4-20 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposal is INCONSISTENT with LWRP Policies and with the LWRP. Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. 1. Avoid development other than water-dependent uses in coastal hazard areas. Locate new development which is not water-dependent as far away from coastal hazard areas as practical. a. No development is permitted in natural protective feature areas, except as specifically allowed under the relevant portions of 6 NYCRR 505.8. b. Avoid hazards by siting structures to maximize the distance from Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas. 1. The entire parcel is located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area //f t'A _ bM1 %�t� '�6 yy J t 4�IM" I�� 4 �r P�l1µ�• i. J�, � � °�f,���� ,'� "[4'�Y ✓�,. Hyl.��'� ��`� ,� �_ Suffolk COUnty, UConn/CTDEEP, Esri, HERE, Garmin, GeoTechnola ies, 9... The purpose of Chapter 111, COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREAS is to regulate, in coastal areas, land use and development activities so as to minimize or prevent damage or destruction to man-made property, natural protective features and other natural resources and to protect human life. In addition, the purpose of Chapter 111 is to regulate new construction or placement of structures in order to place them a safe distance from coastal hazard areas. §,111-4. Purpose. The Town of Southold hereby assumes the responsibility and authority to implement and administer a Coastal Erosion Management Program within its jurisdiction pursuant to Article 34 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law. In addition, it is the purpose of this chapter to: B. Regulate, in coastal areas subject to coastal flooding and erosion, land use and development activities so as to minimize or prevent damage or destruction to man-made property, natural protective features and other natural resources and to protect human life. C. Regulate new construction or placement of structures in order to place them a safe distance from areas of active erosion and the impact of coastal storms to ensure that these structures are not prematurely destroyed or damaged due to improper siting, as well as to prevent damage to natural protective features and other natural resources, 2. The entire structure is located within a VE EL 13 flood zone. VE coastal areas are subject to high-velocity water including waves; defined by the 1-percent annual chance flood and wave effects 3 feet or greater. This means that the flood has a I% chance of being met or exceeded in any given year. i I I t „Ia r �,. I � 'a � �. r,,� �r i�;±�'��=',4a��,14%k'^S"�4� Yt��S��`+ " o?°�`.'«•�4 � _ riP , •'f' ✓, _ 1 0 hP {a i^C! f �dAy f � fi9< fiwvq'r,��9u:, '` , M1 A, ,; bar c w W '� �� f� y 9 a frY l�• .� � fh°�'`t Si�.'{�q�i���' �� ��iPok('3Ft" .,1, :li A' I w: �,PI y� rol, �;� �,.�g �'�•�;,3a: is����'��;iiy r�� dii' a.r'�zr.,�W{> '#S•.r%�g:,. � i "� .. �Y 2�T"�� d 3Y'attor,a� �� �"' .'����.•, m, �y ,'A+'t�''} ��rm. � Y � � �' ��� ;MMM�4 ' 'u •_", �aNrfu���'���a'. c n � , +�� xrr,�}c�=�,y/,��+k' -'y�i.s',+1y 1, ';�• ,t,r .�>�� ��n:�tYaG a gx�G a ti.[ " ri�i r r, .fi j76*' i Yu7 �Y' `h..,y P•.�n:�d�'+'tg k S'��t� a�t{� 4 m9, r +� 'aa ff a �, ��`m•N« ij�r �r r� �;B.u•r m �r�� � , s rt �1 � t�J F t JvlY.�"f' �f;:.�, �.•���wi'°,�x".�� ,����iY� S �g� '��';I^ a � �+ i J�J�'tw"�"�` ''t ' � `u us 2 �z,ra �` } �� f €����.• �`:�53}� t t.,Y r Q ,y1�thj:Yr ;d� .a.lp.., n *. '` ` ;,,r'^.,•,' 'i.�\+raJUCI,�d'3'�'+5;1 �L^' "'C' gra��`I", fti't :w'�I I y I'�'��'' �T���rX/'��Y�Nk�t&dr 1s 1�b t•9y�4;„��„�y.{L' �s�#.'�'�""p�` h.§wc IL}'r��[,�� nj "�' � �dy",' a �1n nY7V< l�,a ;i I• =Y IC Il�,,� I I f�+°'���,3'•,t� a -'�' � 9�'„y�° di+i��� T71:'t`d4.�r. ,°r'gf r,;°,� �� ' NO, 1,, 11'9 .#,'6 rti' y��y'•, 1p s'� nr' ••,•--_.....,,,.,.��c' {.; r'S Pik ;7 / b '" 11 I �I[ � V h' r w•� r,x re r i rti NO la HIM '#E rl�,�i,°, � sr`�3�i'S� �""' J' < 'r° �'"� ��r 3� t'�' Y k� �"!l•`� '�'� f'� + , � 100; >� ! � a Q Qn\Mp � 01, , �g 41onC92 �J� a r� r �•�`� �''a".� 'i �7 t n�L�.w� �tiTM 7 y Y � �' �".'(� , vfil- LMMI, + � r or , �l ju �e .2 k " p en•,r �'s �,.r Fi' �f�'"�r'�',���.,� .r �rj� P}a(« � p '�':,pyy�l i r^if�" 'i'�a «��.� �� �a�yy���,"✓� der p�'��� � 5y1a Y'3`�ri '' ., MY88 � ��'H..i,�ry� � Ci' ,�g�p lk, ,' ,�� � k��iu�"' � ,i^• X' },f_ 7� 7?b� '^( y w ��;� �rr4, � •, �'. �� �'" r, @b ire. �. .� 4. The parcel will be adversely impacted by sea level rise over time. 4.2 Protect and restore natural protective features. Natural protective geologic features provide valuable protection and should be protected, restored and enhanced. Destruction or degradation of these features should be discouraged or prohibited. A. No development is permitted in natural protective feature areas, except as specifically allowed under the relevant portions of 6 NYCRR 505.8. B. Maximize the protective capabilities of natural protective features by. 1. avoiding alteration or interference with shorelines in a natural condition The proposed actions are located entirely within the coastal erosion hazard area and the primary dune, a natural protective feature. A primary dune is defined in § 111-6 Definitions as a natural protective feature. NATURAL PROTECTIVE FEATURE-- A nearshore area, beach, bluff, primary dune, secondary dune or marsh and their vegetation. PRIMARY DUNE-- The most waterward major dune where there are two or more parallel dunes within a coastal area. Where there is only one dune present, it is the 'primary"one. Occasionally one or more relatively small dune formations exist waterward of the primary dune. These smaller formations will be considered to be part of the "primary dune"for the purposes of this chapter. The waterward limit of a primary dune is the landward limit of its fronting beach. The landward limit of the primary dune is 25 feet landward of its landward toe. A site visit of this area was conducted on October 17, 2007. In attendance at the site visit among others,were representatives of the Town of Southold Board of Trustees, LWRP Coordinator'Mark Terry and NYS DEC's Environment Program Specialist Robert McDonough,which confirmed that the proposed actions are entirely located seaward of the CEHA line and within a primary dune.This determination still applies. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Honorable Lori Hulse, Attorney -W" n A WWI , ,,-. •f iA;. °L �+gym�t��"!�'��.,.1'xf,�.''Mr f�y1,fPs t r i"'^-.+L...�.l,y.; r • a r 3 SITE n, •i • a _ -44 kL aj �h. << ..rik 1 in= 167 ft y , f ft 1994 Line of Development (Note 1 ) Parcel (Note 2) SITE a � ' � •"';�y�l '' '.r � .fid` -•,• �. ? .°�V ,-�i - , i ,,1 .'y1 1:1nd k NOTES 1. 1994 Line of Development digitized from 1994 high resolution aerial. Development line based on closest aerial image to enactment of Chapter 111 (CEHA) by the Town of Southold. Aerial obtained from "' NYS GIS Clearinghouse. 2. Proposed development and Parcel boundary digitized from Proposed 1 in= 100 ft Site Plan prepared by CMA Group, last revised 12/19/2022. Plan - - georeferenced to 2020 orthoimage. 0 25 50 100 3 asem is o oim from NYS GIS Clears ft �,- H `�, �- ry-- � ��, � ,. . B ap ' 2020 rth age f Clearinghouse. �► - . 4 Prepared By: Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. Project: EXISTING DEVELOPMENT 570 Expressway Drive South, Suite 2F For: Ed Licalzi Landuse Medford,NY 11763 At: 1925 North Sea Dr., Southold, NY SCTM #1000- 54 -4 -20 "'�""" Date: 2/27/2023 Revised: Scale:As Noted Sheet: ED-1 • E y • l' ' f i •�y"�. �' .3�m R_bi ` � i A �_ '%.Lot#15 3 T - _ -`� ? �25;748t3F ` i TLot#1' t �,< t �11 �xn�s .ta�v, Ilkg . 26,350 SF Lot#19 Lot#20 Lot#21 Lot#22„ Lot#23 ;' t"• .. a Lot#24 s `1?920 SF k+ 26,676 SF res ' 3,828 SF '=4 2,498,SF 24,879 SF Y r; X58;936 SF' J 23,000 SF ig= 19,950,,SFy 11332 SF. % ` �'^"^ti•b ' _ ' ' - 2,607 SF 3,781 SF 1;159'SF '4 �_ 2;450 SF �: 1,312 SFt;, 1,299 SF �: 1;176�SF F ` o 4 681 S_F;,; 1�754 SF • 2,23 6 S i L s x.512 S v, arf 1;727•SF. 0 SF,_ 2 34 F ° -.r. 14.3/o r h • r 13.2°/' w:{ LI, 6.9% 7 9% 4 �7Y6% i _11.1% J1 10.9% F► 4, 7 :i:—� fitp:5;' r '�5 ��� j ---_ T`___ -, ,� 1 +i ''� �".-arty[ ' Ifs •' ..�' „ -� f dot#16Lot#17 t . a �.: + McCabe's Beach 25,748 SF 25,236 SF �"` JR_j 'r� * (Town of Southold) 61* N/A 1,342 N%q 21340 SF �• 9.2% t 4 NOTES 1. Site and Proposed Structures digitized from Proposed Site Plan prepared by CMA Group, Subject Property (Site, Note 1) last revised 12/19/2022. Site Plan georeferenced to 2020 orthoimage. ® Proposed Dwelling (Note 1) 2. 500 foot radius obtained using Buffer tool on Site boundary. 3. Parcel within 500' of Site information obtained from Town of Southold records, and includes: D Proposed Development Footprint (Note 1) Lot number, lot size (SF) 500' Radius (Note 2) Dwelling Size (SF) Parcel within 500' of Site (Note 3) Development Footprint (SF, %) 4. Basemap is 2020 orthoimage from NYS GIS Clearinghouse (gis.ny.gov). ,y Prepared By: Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. Project: EXISTING DEVELOPMENT WITHIN 500' 1 in= 100 ft 570 Expressway Drive South, Suite 2F For: Ed Licalzi LandUseMedford,NY 11763 At: 1925 North Sea Dr., Southold,NY 0 25 50 100 SCTM #1000- 54 -4 -20 ft "` """"` Date: 2/27/2023 Revised: Scale:As Noted Sheet: RM-1 r DENIS NONCARROW Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK � . P.O. Box 1179 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Southold,New York 11971 MARRIAGE OFFICER Fax (631) 765-6145 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER Telephone (631) 765-1800 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AGENDA Tentative 2/28 SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD February 28,2023 4:30 PM POLICY: At the beginning of scheduled Town Board meetings,the attending public is encouraged to briefly address the Town Board relating to agenda resolutions prior to their enactment; the public will also be given time at the conclusion of the regularly scheduled business agenda to address the Board on any given topic. ONLINE ACCESS: The Tentative Agenda is generally available the Friday before the meeting. The video of the meeting is usually available to watch live during the meeting. Minutes with adopted resolutions are available 1-2 days after the meeting. A full copy of the minutes, agenda and meeting video can be viewed by going to the official Town of Southold website: www.southoldtoMMU.gov<http://www.southoldtonMU.gov> and following either of the following: (1) Move pointer over"Government" on the Town website home page. You will find the title "Town Supervisor/Town Board". Under this title you will see "Southold Town Board Meetings and Agendas". or (2) Go to "How Do I", in the right upper corner of the Town website home page, Choose "Access", then "Southold Town Board Meetings and Agendas. Go to the date of the meeting and click on "Minutes Packet" this is the full copy of the resolutions. (Scroll to bottom of page for KEY to symbols). You can view the live video of the meeting by clicking on the camera symbol. All of this information is available 24/7. If you would like help navigating the site, please feel free to call my office 631-765-1800. Due to the expiration of the New York State Governor's Executive Orders regarding the COVID-19 pandemic in-person access to the Public will now be permitted. The meeting will still be accessible via Zoom and streamed live on the Town's website. The meeting can be viewed live by going to the Town's website at www.southoldtownny.gov <http://www.southtowM.gov>home page. Click on the"Government"tab, once the drop down menu appears, under"Town Supervisor/Town Board", click on"Southold Town Board Minutes and Agendas" which takes the user to the Town of Southold Meeting Portal page. Once on the Meeting Portal page, click on the date of the meeting you wish to view and then click on "Video". A recording of the meeting will also air on Channel 22 and will be posted on the Town's website Instructions and link to attend the meeting will be available on the Town's website or by calling the Town Clerk's office at (631)765-1800. A telephone number will also be provided to allow members of the public to attend via telephone. Written comments and/or questions may also be submitted via email to the Town Clerk at denisn@southoldtownny.gov<mailto:denisn@southoldtownny.gov>and Lynda.rudder@town.southold.n�us <mailto:Lynda.rudder(c�r�,town.southold.ny.us> . Said comments and/or questions will be considered at the public hearing provided that they are submitted no later than 12:00 P.M. (Prevailing Time) on the day of the public hearing. Pursuant to the requirements of the Executive Order of the Governor of the State of New York, a transcript will be prepared of the public hearing, and a copy shall be filed with the Town Clerk and placed upon the Town's website. Please check the meeting Agenda posted on the Town's website (www.southoldtownny.gov) for further instructions or for any changes to the instructions to access the public hearing, and for updated information. Call to Order 4:30 PM Meeting called to order on February 28, 2023 at Meeting Hall, 53095 Route 25, Southold,NY. Attendee Name `:. Present Absent Late Arrived Councilwoman Sarah E. Nappa ❑._w. -p ❑ Councilman Gre Doroski � ❑ ❑ � ❑ _ Councilman Brian O. Mealy ❑ ❑ ❑ Councilwoman Jill Doherty ❑ ❑ ❑ Justice Louisa P. Evansm _ ❑� ❑ µ ❑ �µ � Supervisor Scott A. Russell ❑ ❑ ❑ I. Reports 1. Trustees Monthly Report January 2023 2. Land Tracking Report Fourth quarter of 2022 II. Public Notices III. Communications IV. Discussion 1. 9:00 AM -Public Hearing Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review Appeal of MKS Realty, LLC (SCTM#1000-54-4-20) 2. 9:15 AM-Heather Lanza, Planning Director and Councilman Mealy Request to Attend National Planning Conference and Outline of Conference Presentation on Communication Skills for Planners 3. 9:30 AM -Tim Abrams, Building Maintenance Supervisor HRC Building Improvements/ARPA Funding 4. 9:45 AM- Dan Goodwin, Superintendent of Highways Spring Clean-Up 5. Resolution Objecting to the Governor's Housing Compact 6. Sanitary Flow Credit Price 7. Supervisor Russell Summer Showcase Concert Series, Inc. Request for Budget Increase 8. MHS Community Service Outreach Fair- Thursday,March 23,2023 from 11:45A.M.-2:10P.M. 9. Create Working Group for Language Access in Town Government 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION -Labor-Matters Involving Update on CSEA Contract Negotiations 10:30 AM- Alyssa Zuckerman, Esq. 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION -Labor-Matters Involving Update on PBA Contract Negotiations 11:00 AM -Richard Zuckerman, Esq. 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION -Potential Acquisition(S), Sale or Lease of Real Property Where Publicity Would Substantially Affect the Value Thereof 11:30 AM -Lilly McCullough, Land Preservation Executive Assistant with Melissa Spiro, LPC Consultant 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION -Labor- Matters Involving the Employment/Appointment of a Particular Person(S) - Councilman Mealy re: Youth Bureau Member V. Resolutions 2023-233 CATEGORY.• Audit DEPARTMENT: Town Clerk Approve Audit RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby approves the audit dated February 28th, 2023. ✓Vote Record-Resolution RES-2023-233 ❑ Adopted ❑ Adopted as Amended ........... ... ........._.__...._....._.__._.._ _ .... _. ...__T.-....__._._......_..._.___.--.__.------.__ _-------_.___._,.........-._._-___ ❑ Defeated 1 Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent ❑ Tabled Sarah E.Nappa [ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Withdrawn Greg Doroski -- ❑ _❑ - ❑ - ❑ - ❑ Supervisor's App . ................__...._.._..._.........--_...._.__.._.. ------._— -----..................-...------.._.._..............-.........._..- --- ..__;.........._.....----....---- - . . . . Brian O.Mealy ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt --..................._....:---- -----.._._._....:........__.....__....._._.__..._............ ......_....__.._...- ........_. ❑ Rescinded Jill Doherty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ _....._... -------- _—............. .-............................:-----.....__._...._........................................__......... -- ................. ❑ Town Clerk's Appt Louisa P.Evans ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt -._._....-......_......_........__.._.. - -- ---..€_._._...._.._..----._._._......_..- ---- - - Scott A.Russell ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Action _....----.____. .__._....:....._........_..._..........._.._..._. ❑ Lost 2023-234 CATEGORY.• Set Meeting DEPARTMENT: Town Clerk Set Next Town Board Meeting RESOLVED that the next Regular Town Board Meeting of the Southold Town Board be held, Tuesday, March 14th 2023 at the Southold Town Hall Southold New York at 7:00 P. M.. ,'Vote Record-Resolution RES-2023-234 ❑ Adopted ❑ Adopted as Amended --._......._...--__ _--_---- __ .........._._................_................____._._...-----.---------- ,__._....__e._______.. ❑ Defeated E Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent ��- -------- --...-................. .._. ...................... .......... ❑ Tabled Sarah E.Nappa ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Withdrawn Greg Doroski -- ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supervisor's Appt ....... .-_.._............. ------.__.........-------...........----__.._............ ................... Brian O.Mealy ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt — _.—____.___...._.... .---....----..-._........................................................................................ .............................. ._............_:..........._......---- ...__.......:...._..--.._..__......_... .....;._ ❑ Rescinded Jill Doherty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ..............--....__........................... _.. ---- - -- ...._...._........_ ❑ Town Clerk's Appt Louisa P.Evans ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt _--. ............................... _.... _— ------..._—______--------__....._....._.... .._--------_............_. _..__....... _._..- Scott A.Russell ❑ No Action -..._ .[7-..._...._.___..�...___-_-_� __._ ..___._.__._..._....._____.___--------,.___...._..._---- .._._._......_:_. ❑ Lost _....__...__.......__.......__..._....._...__......... ....................... . .. ... _...__.........................._...--..._........__.._..._.........._._._._. ............................... .. ............_....................__.. ...._........_........_.._..__..... .... 2023-86 Tabled 113/2023 4:30 PM, 1/17/2023 7:00 PM, 1/31/2023 4:30 PM, 2/14/2023 7:00 PM CATEGORY.• Budget Modification DEPARTMENT: Accounting 2023 Budget Modification-Capital(DPW/HRC) Financial Impact: Appropriate ARPA funds for HRC Building Improvements WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold wishes to appropriate ARPA funding received for HRC Building Improvements, and WHEREAS the Town's Capital Budget process requires a resolution to authorize and/or amend Capital Budget items in the Capital Fund,now therefore be it RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby establishes the following capital project and modifies the Capital budget as follows: Capital Project Name: HRC Building Improvements Financing Method: ' Federal ARPA Funding Budget: Increase Revenues: H.4089.00 ARPA Funding $180,000 Total $180,000 Increase Appropriations: H.1620.2.500.225 HRC Building Improvements $180,000 Total $180,000 ,,'Vote Record-Resoln'tion RES-2023-86 ❑ Adopted ❑ Adopted as Amended ................... .._......_................_.............-......_._.—._.._.. ----.........._...—_ -.........................................._....----......_._..................,--..................................... ❑ Defeated E Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent ❑ Tabled Sarah E.Nappa € ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ .-................................................_...__..._.. ....-----.. ____ - -----...-..__._...-—._. .......... ......................................... ❑ Withdrawn Greg Doroski � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supervisor's Appt _.........................-...........----- ._....._............._._..._..............._.._...._....._..........._--- ..._._......Brian O.Mealy ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt —__, .-----......_.__.__ -------------__ ❑ Rescinded Jill Doherty E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Town Clerk's Appt Louisa P.Evans E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt — ----------- ,._............................__......._............_............._.._...-._._....................<---------------_......_...._....- _...._..........._.. Scott A.Russell E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Action - -..._..._._..._...._._.........._. _.—......_._..._-........ . ❑ Lost 2023-235 CATEGORY. Committee Appointment DEPARTMENT: Town Clerk Appoint Member to the Water Advisory Committee RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby appoints John Stype, to the Southold Town Water Advisory Committee, effective immediately thru March 31, 2024. ✓Vote Record 7 Resolution RES-2023-235 ❑ Adopted ❑ Adopted as Amended _.. I- _...............--- ..........._.........._....-- _..._.. -.._..._.. ❑ Defeated Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent ❑ Tabled Sarah E.Nappa I mm❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Withdrawn Greg Doroski I ❑ _ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supervisor's Appt _.....-- - --..__.... .----...._......._....._._...---.._........................._.........._._.._._................................... ... ............... _._......_...._........- ..._..- Brian O.Mealy ( ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt .... .... -.....................---......_..;_.._._...---...._..-..---------------.._........ ...__....__._...._._.......:.............. ..... ❑ Rescinded Jill Doherty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ----._............. .._..._.._......._.._..__.._.._..._..........................�. .._.............................__... - ---....._..__.......----......_...... _ ❑ Town Clerk's Appt Louisa P.Evans ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ......... r—.-__..___...___.._.__..__. ._.._._. ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt Scott A.Russell ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Action ❑ Lost 2023-236 CATEGORY.• Budget Modification DEPARTMENT: Accounting 2023 Budget Modification-DPW Financial Impact.- Increase mpact:Increase budget for damage reimbursement RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby modifies the 2023 General Fund Whole Town budget as follows: Increase Revenues: A.2770.10 Other Unclassified Revenue, Misc $1,400 Total $1,400 Increase Appropriations: A.1620.4.00.100 DPW, Building Maint/Re air $1,400 Total $1,400 ✓Vote Record-Resolution RES-2023-236 ❑ Adopted ❑ Adopted as Amended _.__.........._......._............. --------.._._........T.__....._d.....—._....._._._.._... -...._..._._._._.._._...._._.._...._........_._.,....._..__....--._..._....__.._...._...._.._.__...._......_........._..._....... Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent ❑ Defeated ................ . ... ....................................................... . .... ... ❑ Tabled Sarah E.Nappa ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ._.................................... . ...... . ..... .. . ._......................... . . . ..................................................;..................... ... ................ ... ....... _ ❑ Withdrawn Greg Doroski [ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supervisor's Appt -_._.__.----._............._._._....__..... _._...----..._..__. .----_.--_____.._._____.._-........................................ .------.__._..-__.__---------�--.._.._. Brian O.Mealy ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt _... . .................................._.__........................................._............_.................... ...... ❑ Rescinded Jill Doherty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Town Clerk's Appt Louisa P.Evans € ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt Scott A.Russell---ry-u ❑ - �❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Action — ........ ----......_...._.........._-._........_......._....... - ...._... ❑ Lost 2023-237 CATEGORY: Employment-Town DEPARTMENT: Accounting Amend Resolution Number 2023-137 RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby amends Resolution Number 2023-137 to read as follows: SUPERVISOR'S APPOINTMENT Supervisor Scott A. Russell hereby appoints Kevin Foote as Deputy Supervisor of the Town of Southold effective February 10,2023 through December 31, 2023. -'Vote Record-Resolution RES-2023-237 ❑ Adopted ❑ Adopted as Amended i --- ❑ Defeated E Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent -- ......._..------..._........................................._._....._.._—._..__._............_._........._._:.......................... .._.._...._..... ❑ Tabled Sarah E.Nappa ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ -----......._.. ------...... .................. ..........................---->---.._..._._..-.__.....--. . ....._._............ ❑ Withdrawn Greg Doroski I € ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supervisor's Appt --....................._............._._..---....- -.....-._....... �._.....- —- --=---............................................ -------.._.............._ ............................._............ Brian O.Mealy ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt _. _.___...._..._..._.._..._.. . . ...-----_--.,_�.__. _ ........ __ __ _....._......._....._.-.---__._.._ _. ___....... ❑ Rescinded Jill Doherty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ .._...._........................... ❑ Town Clerk's Appt Louisa P.Evans ❑ ❑ __.._....0.. ...__._._;_._______O__-__-.. ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt - -- - Scott A.Russell — ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Action ❑ Lost 2023-238 CATEGORY. Authorize to Bid DEPARTMENT. Town Clerk Recreation Center HVAC Bid RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby authorizes and directs the Town Clerk to advertise for bids for HVAC work at the Southold Town Recreation Center located at 970 Peconic Lane, Peconic,New York, subject to the approval of the Town Attorney. ✓'Vote Record-Resolution RES-2023-238 ❑ Adopted ❑ Adopted as Amended ❑ Defeated Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent ❑ Tabled Sarah E.Nappa ❑ _ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Withdrawn Greg Doroski — � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supervisor's Appt ........... ....-......._...._..._....................................................... ..._.__...._..----- ......_........ ..........._..............__.._.._..._..._ _._....................._.. ....;..... ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt Brian O.Mealy ❑ ❑ ❑— - ❑ ❑ Rescinded Jill Doherty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ....................................._..........................—..._..._........_.._............---.................,............................__......_....__... ---................ ... PP Louisa P.Evans ( ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 11 Town Clerk's Appt ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt --..__._..__._......_ ...........-_-.............._. _..._ ...._..- --+............_.......................... Scott A.Russell I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Action ❑ Lost 2023-239 CATEGORY.• Employment-Town DEPARTMENT.• Accounting Amend Resolution Number 2023-65 RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby amends Resolution Number 2023-65 to read as follows: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby acknowledges the retirement of Richard Mellas from the position of Highway Labor Crew Leader for the Highway Department , effective April 28, 2023. ✓Vote Record=Resolution RES-2023-239 ❑ Adopted ❑ Adopted as Amended ................................................................ .. . .......................... —._.................................__ — ....._..--..._._....._._ ....._.. ......._... .................__..._........... ._. Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent ❑ Defeated ❑ Tabled Sarah E.Nappa I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ —...._......... ❑ Withdrawn Greg Doroski ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ — ❑ Supervisor's Appt ——_.___---..._...._.._........_._..............._._..-___—..__.................... ;.____.. Brian O.Mealy ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt ❑ Rescinded Jill Doherty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ...........--.—....................__._.._._..........................................................._-__..._..........._.....---......................................-- ----...................................... ....._.._.........._............. _..._....- ❑ Town Clerk's Appt Louisa P.Evans ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supt H s Appt _................_........................ ...._.__............._......_......._........__.. _ --._._......._...._._....._...__....._......_.__..:.. ...._..__..._. _._............................... P g�Y PP ._...._...._._.... Scott A.Russell ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Action --- ........._......—..................................._.....................----.:..__.._..------......................... . ...-........................-- ❑ Lost 2023-240 CATEGORY. Employment-Town DEPARTMENT.• Accounting Appoint Elizabeth Weiss PT Account Clerk RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby appoints Elizabeth Weiss to the position of a art-time Account Clerk for the Solid Waste District effective March 1, 2023 at a rate of$23.30 per hour. ✓Vote Record-Resolution RES-2023-240 ❑ Adopted ❑ Adopted as Amended --.....-...-----._.................................__.._.... ..........................-----................_.._._ _.__................................_......_ _-------------------------_..------._...._---... ❑ Defeated Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent _._.............................._....----............_........._...........:............ .._......- --_.............-...--._...._.._... ❑ Tabled Sarah E.Nappa __ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Withdrawn Greg Doroski ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supervisor's Appt _.._.._..........___.__.—__.__..._.__.____......__ .._...... _._........... Brian O.Mealy ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt ❑ Rescinded Jill Doherty — ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ _...._..........._.—.—................._.__...._..................................... .................—._..............__...........---... —.................__....__._. _........_._ ❑ Town Clerk's Appt _._.............__._. PP Louisa P.Evans ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ..... — ._......._...._..__..........._.._...._._._......—.....--..._................__............... .... ......... ............................. 11 Supt Hgwys Appt .. ........................................_..._.........................._.i..,.-...�_................................... Scott A.Russell ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Action ..................._............................_._...__._.---........................._._.............. ................ ...................... i 0 Lost 2023-241 CATEGORY. Employment-FIFD DEPARTMENT.• Accounting Approve Resolution Number 2023-030 RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby ratifies and approves Resolution Number 2023-030 of the Fishers Island Ferry District adopted February 21, 2023 which reads as follows: WHEREAS the Fishers Island Ferry District policy as described in the Employee Handbook grants a 1%longevity increase to wages when an individual has been employed by the Fishers Island Ferry District for ten years; and, It is RESOLVED to note that with effect February 28, 2023, employee 40842 salary be increased by 1%to$106,050.00. ✓Vote Record-Resolution RES-2023-241 ❑ Adopted ❑ Adopted as Amended -..............._................................ ...................... ........,._. .. .._..._..........- ❑ Defeated Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent ❑ Tabled Sarah E.Nappa ( ❑ ❑ _ ❑ ❑ ❑ Withdrawn Greg Doroski 17 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ._... ---...._............._..---._.......,......._.........._........... ❑ Supervisor's Appt _....__.._.—_.._..____.____.._.................................. E Brian O.Mealy -—......._.__._._..... El11 ❑ ❑ TaxReceiver's Appt ........................................_•— ....... -......_...........— ---...._.__...-.........._ ❑ Rescinded Jill Doherty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ............_._...................................__...._.._............_............._.................... . .._......................_....... -— ....- ---- PP ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Town Clerk's Appt Louisa P.Evans ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt - -.___.__-.__._._....._........_.__.._..._....._.....! ._.._......_..._........ ..........._._._;...._._...--- - Scott A.Russell ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Action ❑ Lost 2023-242 CATEGORY. Employment-FIFD DEPARTMENT. Accounting Approve Resolution Number 2023-031 RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby ratifies and approves Resolution Number 2023-031 of the Fishers Island Ferry District adopted February 21, 2023 which reads as follows: It is RESOLVED to accept the resignation of Swillia Moore as a cashier with effect February 8, 2023.Swillia Moore does not have accruals. ✓Vote Record-Resolution RES-2023-242 ❑ Adopted .............._....-...--.........................._ ... _...................�...............:.... ..........................---.._._....._.._..._.._.._..._.. ...._.._................-....---............. .............. Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent ❑ Adopted as Amended ----.-.---- ............ 0 - ❑ Defeated Sarah E.Nappa ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ _.. _..........._....__..._.-.. - ...._.. ........... .._._...;....._._.........._.....---------- --- ❑ Tabled Greg Doroski ---❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Withdrawn Brian O.Mealy ( _❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supervisor's Appt .................._......._....__....._ ........................t. - --....---- --->......._.._... ..--.._....._....._........_ _.......... ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt Jill Doherty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ _..............-----................-------.....__.........................................,.........................................._......................:......---......---........................;............... ................... . ...........-__._..._._.._..----- ❑ Rescinded Louisa P.Evans ( ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ......................_........_.......................... . ...................._.............e_......... 11 Town Clerk's Appt _....................... ,._. Scott A.Russell ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Supt Hgwys Appt -___._.._.__ _ _..__._..._...._.._._..—.................... ............._.........__.._..__._.__..........._...._...._ ............... __......__..__._..._......._... ❑ No Action ❑ Lost 2023-243 CATEGORY.- Employment-FIFD DEPARTMENT.• Accounting Approve Resolution Number 2023-032 RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby ratifies and approves Resolution Number 2023-032 of the Fishers Island Ferry District adopted February 22, 2023 which reads as follows: It is RESOLVED to accept the resignation of Anthony Mirabelli as a part time Captain(FIFD) with effect February 13, 2023.No accruals are due to Mr Mirabelli. ✓Vote Record-Resolution )i$-2023-243 ❑ Adopted ❑ Adopted as Amended ----..._.__.__.. _..--------__--____-_..._.__...----___.__....._...r.__—._.........____...__.. ❑ Defeated Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent ❑ Tabled Sarah E.Nappa i ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Withdrawn Greg Doroski ❑— ❑ — ❑ ❑ ❑ Supervisor's Appt ---... ---..._.............. .._...__.._._....._..._.__ _.........._.._.._............_:.........._._.....-- -._..._._....................._....__..... __......__......_.._..__......._......_ ��' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt Brian O.Mealy ❑ Rescinded Jill Doherty E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ -----._.._..__...——--..._.......__......._...... _.._ _........._....__......_._......_.............__....:.........._........_... ._._._._...._._;.—_—_._._._.......__._........_..._.......-------.............. . ❑ Town Clerk's Appt Louisa P.Evans ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt Scott A.Russell ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Action ❑ Lost 2023-244 CATEGORY.• Attend Seminar DEPARTMENT: Planning Board Attend Seminar-2023 National Planning Conference RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby grants permission to Heather Lanza, Town Planning Director, to attend the 2023 National Planning Conference, to be held in Philadelphia, PA, April 1-4, 2023. All expenses to be a legal charge to the 2023 Planning Department budget. ✓Vote Record-Resolution RES-2023-244 ❑ Adopted Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent ❑ Adopted as Amended Sarah E.Nappa ❑ _ ❑ -,❑ — ❑ ❑ Defeated -.._.._..__......—...---.................................. -... ._....._...._........... ... ...... .........._................. ...... ❑ Tabled Greg Doroski ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ...._......_...._.._...---...__......................... ._.._. .............................:. ......_.........................-->----......... ._ _...-- ❑ Withdrawn Brian O.Mealy { ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ........ ........._............_._._.------------ _ .. _... _ ........._........---.._._..._..-----...._......;.......---............................. .. ❑ Supervisor's Appt Jill Doherty ( '-- ---�- -----—❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt —_______._ ____.--_-___-.. .__. _...._...I}.E_ ----........._...._ __.............. ..._._._.-----.___..__.._— ❑ Rescinded Louisa P.Evans { ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Town Clerk's Appt Scott A.Russell —— —'— i ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt ❑ No Action ❑ Lost 2023-245 CATEGORY.• Attend Seminar DEPARTMENT. Planning Board Attend Seminar-2023 National Planning Conference RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby grants permission to Mark Terry, Assistant Town Planning Director, Brian Cummings, Town Planner, and Mara Cerezo, Town Planner to attend the 2023 National Planning Conference,to be held virtually April 26-28, 2023. All expenses to be a legal charge to the 2023 Planning Department budget. ✓Vote Record-Resolution RES-2023-245 ❑ Adopted ❑ Adopted as Amended —- - -- -- -- 11 Defeated Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent ❑ Tabled Sarah E.Nappa I _ - ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ -. --..................... __.._._..- ._..._.__....--- ....._....... . :---................._...........---=--------------................ ... ❑ Withdrawn Greg Doroski ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supervisor's Appt _._........----__.. ..........................._.. - ---...-==-- .............._.............. ........,................................_...- -- .._..._._.._._........................_. , .....................-----......- Brian O.Mealy 11 ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt ..................._........--—....-------..__._...__._.._.._ __......__..__..._.._............._....._..._..._.._..,.... _...... --._..__...._.__............---..................._... ............... ❑ Rescinded Jill Doherty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ............__...... —....... ...___......_..._.__-_.; __ PP ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Town Clerk's Appt Louisa P.Evans ❑ ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt Scott A.Russell ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Action ❑ Lost ........... ._.._... ...... - _................................... __ .... .. _..-. .-._._._......- _..__... .. ._...... .. .... _...._........_..._.. -..._ _. 2023-246 CATEGORY.- Attend Seminar DEPARTMENT. Justice Court Judge Eileen Powers Attend Seminar RESOLVED that the Town of Southold hereby grants permission to Justice Eileen Powers to attend the National Association of Treatment Court Professionals in Saratoga,NY on March 8-10, 2023. All expenses to be charged to the 2023 Justice Court budget. -/Vote Record-Resolution RES-2023-246 ❑ Adopted ......._..........__...._._.__._..__.___...___.._.__...... ._------------ ...._......._........................................_......._.__._----- __ Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain _ - Absent ❑ Adopted as Amended _ ❑ Defeated Sarah E.Nappa (^ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tabled Greg Doroski D — __.O ❑ ❑ ❑ Withdrawn _..._.................._.....--....................._.__.._.........._...._e-------- --._._.._._........_..........._.. .. .... .................. .........................---_..... Brian O.Mealy ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supervisor's Appt .._................._......_.—_....__......:......._................._-....................:.................... . .. ..............,............. -- -_.......... ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt Jill Doherty ( ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Rescinded Louisa P.Evans ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ .....--...._.__._.__..__. _...... .. ........_. __._..__.___._...._.___----___....-_._....._......_ _............. ...............__. El Town Clerk's A ........ PPt Scott A.Russell j ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt __ ❑ No Action ❑ Lost -.._........ _..._..._....._..... ...... ... .... ................._.... .............. .... 2023-247 CATEGORY.• Agreements-Non DEPARTMENT: Town Attorney SCBOE Agreement for Recreation Center RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby authorizes and directs Supervisor Scott A. Russell to execute the Agreement between the Town of Southold and Suffolk County Board of Elections in connection with leasing Southold Recreation Center as an Early Voting Poling Place for the Primary and Early Voting Election days for 2023 with a one year option to renew, subject to the approval of the Town Attorney. ✓Vote Record-Resolution RES-2423-247 ❑ Adopted ❑ Adopted as Amended ---- �- ❑ Defeated Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent —.._.;......... -------- — --<--... _... --------_----._- ❑ Tabled Sarah E.Nappa El ❑ ❑ ❑ _........_..._g . ......._...................... _..................._.........-_. . .....,...... . .......... _........................................- . ._........_...........................................---....................... .. ................... ❑ Withdrawn Gre Doroski ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supervisor's Appt ...._...----............-----....... ----------- ._....._.....--------- Brian 0.Mealy i ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt ❑ Rescinded Jill Doherty i ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Town Clerk's Appt Louisa P.Evans ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt Scott A.Russell ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Action ❑ Lost 2023-248 CATEGORY.• Employment-Town DEPARTMENT.• Accounting Amend Resolution Number 2023-224 'RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby amends Resolution Number 2023-224 to read as follows: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby appoints James Squicciarini to the position of Assistant Town Attorney for the Town of Southold, effective February 23, 2023 through December 31, 2023, at a rate of$150,000 per annum. ` -'Vote Record-Resolution RES:2023-24$ _.. ... _..:.................._._......... . .........._...................... ......... ❑ Adopted Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent ❑ Adopted as Amended ....... ... ..._..............................................----........_............_.__.....__._.... _..__............_..--....-............... ❑ Defeated Sarah E.Nappa ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ __.. _................................. _...................-.._-__._i.-......__..__._..__............_.............._ _.................. _ ❑ Tabled Greg Doroski j ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ .... ... ............................ ____.____...._............_.._.....___._ ❑ Withdrawn Brian 0.Mealy } ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supervisor's Appt Jill Doherty ❑ -^ ._,_ - ❑ T D ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt 0 Rescinded Louisa P.Evans —) ! ❑ ❑_ ❑ ❑ ❑ Town Clerk's Appt Scott A.Russell I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt -----.........._.................-----........._..............A—.........._._......................_._._.._°.....................---------.................._.. --------...._................................................ ❑ No Action ❑ Lost 2023-249 CATEGORY. Contracts,Lease&Agreements DEPARTMENT: Town Clerk West Law Annual Subscription Financial Impact: A.1410.4.100.125 02/21/23 A.1410..4.100.125 Code Books& Updates $2,876.16 RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold Hereby Authorizes and Directs Supervisor Scott A. Russell to Execute the West Law Order Forms Between the Town of Southold and West Group Regarding a Twelve (12) Month Agreement in Connection with the Government West Proflex Plan Law Book Updates for the Town Clerk's Office at a Cost of$239.68 Per Month for the Term January 1, 2023 through December 31, -20233 All in Accordance with the Approval of the Town Attorney. Legal Charge to Town Clerk Account A.1410.4.100.125. ✓vote Record-Resolution RES-2023-249, ❑ Adopted ❑ Adopted as Amended _—........_.....----._.._..._..._._... __._.._..._......__._.._..--- ---- --._............_......._:....._.. ---............._...._.............. -- ❑ Defeated Yes/Aye No/Nay 1 Abstain Absent ................_..--....---_............_.._...... _...................:._..—..... --—......._. ❑ Tabled Sarah E.Nappa € ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Withdrawn Greg Doroski E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supervisor's Appt Brian O.Mealy ; ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt ❑ Rescinded Jill Doherty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ------- —.—._._...._.._._........--... ......_..._....._;. ....----.....__._._.._._...._..---......... —-------------- 0 Town Clerk's Appt Louisa P.Evans ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt --- .................. --.— ....._._.................. __._......__._ ..—..._.............. --._....--- ---...................._.._._..... Scott A.Russell ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Action ..—......_............--— —--- --._.............................._.__...._...----..._.._—.._..... ❑ Lost 2023-250 CATEGORY.- Contracts,Lease&Agreements DEPARTMENT.• Recreation Hire Spring 2023 Recreation Program Instructors Financial Impact: Contracts for Spring Instructors Resolved that the Town Board of the Town of Southold authorize and direct Supervisor Scott A. Russell to execute an agreement with the following individuals and businesses for the Spring 2023 Recreation programs, all in accordance with the approval of the town attorney. Funding for the instructors listed below has been budgeted for in the Recreation Department's 2023 instructor line A.7020.4.500.420. Grace Rowan(Morning Stretch, Senior Bootcamp, Tabata) $40/hour Alice Jones (Crochet) $30/hour Ian Toy (Intro Watercolor, Intermediate Watercolor) $30/hour Terry Barrett(Line Dancing) $75/person Rachel Thomas (Healthy Lifestyles, Ancestral Garden) $30/hour Steven Schwab (Chair Yoga) $30/hour Amy Greenberg (Yoga Therapy) $30/hour Alan Stewart (Tai Chi) $30/hour Linda Knoernschild (Aromatherapy) $30/hour Susan Kaufman(Memoirs) $30/hour Steven Starroff Pickleball $45/hour -'Vote Record-Resolution RES-2023-250 ❑ Adopted ❑ Adopted as Amended .._-...._._....._...__......._......................_......._...............-.__................ ............ ❑ Defeated Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent —.__..._:._......._._.._..._.......-----_ ..__.:_..- - - -- - :.......------------.._....._ ❑ Tabled Sarah E.Nappa ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ _._.................................. —............._..----....._.._..------..__........_..-........ - ❑ Withdrawn Greg Doroski ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supervisor's Appt _................................._._.._...... .... ..._......._.............._......_..__............___.._._ _...................._..__._.-__......._.._.__...._.._.._._..____............ Brian O.Mealy ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt ❑ Rescinded Jill Doherty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Town Clerk's Appt Louisa P.Evans ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt ..........................-..........-.....-----.......-......................_._ - -.........---...__......_..........._...._.;.-- -.._..._................ ...................................-.........----------_-------------------- Scott A.Russell f ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Action ❑ Lost 2023-251 CATEGORY: Bid Acceptance DEPARTMENT.• Engineering Award Greton Court Drainage Project to Cardo Site Development Financial Impact: H.8540.2.100.150 RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby accepts the proposal of Cardo Site Development dated February 22, 2023 in the amount of$14,950.00 for the drainage project on Greton Court; and be it further RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby authorizes and directs Supervisor Scott A. Russell to execute an Agreement between the Town of Southold and Cardo Site Development in the total amount of$14,950.00, subject to the approval of the Town Attorney. ✓Vote Record-Resolution RES-2023-251 ❑ Adopted Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent ❑ Adopted as Amended ❑ Defeated Sarah E.Nappa I�—❑ _ ❑ ❑ ❑ ------------------........_......._....E..........................._. ........_............:_....................__...__..._-........._..;.--....................................._.......__...._----------.................... L1Tabled Greg Doroski ( ❑ ❑ ❑ 11 ❑ Withdrawn __...._-....._._.__........................................ ...__...................... _ .__..............._..- -- -->.._._..-.. -- - ------......_...._....---...............--.....................- Brian O.Mealy ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supervisor's Appt . ...... ...................._...._...........-.............................._._.—.-....._._.__......—_....-- ------- ....._..._.,......_. ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt Jill Doherty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Rescinded Louisa P.Evans ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Town Clerk's Appt ---------..__._..___...._......_._.__._...__..._____.___.---_................_. . ..............._.......... _. ...._.....-..._._._........ +._.__...__-..-__._._-. ._.._.. Scott A.Russell ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Supt Hgwys Appt El No Action 11 Lost 2023-252 CATEGORY.- Bid Acceptance DEPARTMENT. Engineering 2023 Drainage Materials Bid Acceptance Financial Impact: Funded by H.8540.2.100.150 RESOLVED that the Town Bo'ard of the Town of Southold hereby accepts the bid of Suffolk Precast to supply the Town with drainage materials in the amount of$153,721.00, all in accordance with the Town Attorney. V Vote Record-,Resolution RES-2023-252 11 Adopted 0 Adopted as Amended ............................... ..................................... ............. ............. ....... El Defeated es/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent -----------.................. 11 Tabled Sarah E.Nappa El 0 ❑ 0 .. ................................................. ......—-----......... —>--...................................-- .❑ ............ ................................ 0 Withdrawn Greg Doroski El 0 ❑ 0 Supervisor's Appt ....................................... ............. . ................................. ..........................--------- Brian O.Mealy El ElTax Receiver's Appt .................................... ..................... ❑------ ...................................... 0 Rescinded Jill Doherty 0 Town Clerk's Appt Louisa P.Evans 0 0 0 Supt Hgwys Appt . ................................................................................. ---............................................ .............. ................................................. ...................... Scott A.Russell El 0 No Action .. . ............................................................................................... ....................... ...............................- El Lost ............................... ........ ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................... .................. 2023-253 CATEGORY.• Budget Modification DEPARTMENT. Solid Waste Management District 2023 Budget Modification:SWMD Financial Impact: Provides remaining funds for full payment of brush grinding work on compost site. RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby modifies the 2023 Solid Waste Management District budget as follows: From: SR 8160.4.100.650 Garbage Bags $2,620 To: SR 8160.4.400.150 Compost Site Maintenance $2,620 ,e'Vote'Record-Resolution RES-2023-253 0 Adopted ................... ......................... .................... El Adopted as Amended Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent .................. ------ .. . .. ................._............_..--_.t.._._.--................ 0 Defeated Sarah E.Nappa i 0 0 Tabled Greg Doroski El 0 0 Withdrawn _.._._._x.=_.........----._.................. ............. . ........................... ........ ............................ ❑ Supervisor's Appt Brian O.Mealy a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt _............... ............._._.._...._....._........................ .._._—.._—........_........__._.............._.............__....._......_.....................--- -...........................-------- ......................—...._....._......... Jill Doherty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 11 Rescinded .._..__......---- - --....._..._.__.........................._._.:_—,__.....................----...................... .._....-............ ..._......_..: --......_.. ..........._.........._............ ❑ Town Clerk's Appt Louisa P.Evans I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supt H _ - -- ......._.. ----- - ...... Scott A.Russell ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Action ❑ Lost _._.............. _.._._........ _..._............... .................. 2023-254 CATEGORY.• Contracts,Lease&Agreements DEPARTMENT: Solid Waste Management District NYSDEC HHW Grant Contract Financial Impact: Resulting contract will provide a grant for 50% of the Town's eligible HHW expenses in 2022. WHEREAS,the State of New York provides financial aid for household hazardous waste (HHW)programs; and WHEREAS the Town of Southold has examined and duly considered the applicable laws of the State of New York, and has determined such grant to be in the public interest, and has filed an application for said grant under these laws for calendar year 2022; and WHEREAS, it is necessary that a Contract between the State of New York Town be executed to secure such State aid; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby authorizes and directs Supervisor Scott A. Russell to execute a contract with the State of New York for a Household Hazardous Waste Grant as described herein, along with any other documents that may be necessary, all in accordance with the approval of the Town Attorney. ✓vote Record-Resolution RES-2023-254 ❑ Adopted ❑ Adopted as Amended - .__._......................................................_......_...._._._.__...( .......... ------............................................._.._.. ----...--- ❑ Defeated I Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent __...._...- ........_.._..........----...,-- - ........................ ......__-------------- ❑ Tabled Sarah E.Nappa �� ❑ ❑ El ❑ ....._._........_ ❑ Withdrawn Greg Doroski El ❑ ❑ ❑ Supervisor's Appt ._.......... Brian O.Mealy ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt ❑ Rescinded Jill Doherty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ - -- ....----.._......- .......__...._...._.. —--...............----...-................>.__ .......................__.......... ...._.........-......—_..................... ..................._.........._ ❑ Town Clerk's Appt Louisa P.Evans ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt —._.._..----................................................._._.__.._.__.._.. _.............................._...._............-- -..._._._..................._.........................._......--._... ......... — - ..... .. Scott A.Russell ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Action -- ...--- .........:......................................._.__.._..._........... --...__...._...... ❑ Lost ................._....................................... ................................................._..................................._.._..............._. ......................................................__......_....._...._.._._...... . ._........................---.........._..........._....._....................._.................................... ... ........_.................._..........---.._......_................-............... 2023-255 CATEGORY.• Budget Modification DEPARTMENT.• Police Dept 2022 Budget Modification-Police Dept Financial Impact: - Reallocation offunds to alleviate over expended 2022 budget lines. RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby modifies the 2022 General Fund Whole Town budget as follows: From A.3120.2.500.875 Police/Other Vehicle Equipment $12,033 A.3120.4.100.600 Police/Uniforms &Accessories $27,255 A.3120.4.400.650 Police Vehicle Maintenance & Repairs $9,818 A.3120.4.600.200 Police Officer Training $3,875 A.3120.2.500.876 Police/Vehicle Equip Installation $4,240 A.3120.2.500.400 Police/Radio Equipment $5,179 A.3120.2.200.300 Police/Filing & Storage Equipment $1,526 A.3130.2.300.100 BC Automobiles $4,000 A.3130.2.400.150 BC Light Bars $2,000 A.3130.4.400.650 BC Vehicle Maint& Repairs $4,520 Total $74,446 To: A.3120.4.100.200 Police/Gas &'Oil $63,679 A.3120.4.600.100 Police/Mis. Contracted Services $247 A.3130.4.100.200 BC/Gas & Oil $10,148 A.3130.4.200.100 BC/Celluar Telephone $372 Total $74,446 ,/Vote Record-Resolution RES-2023-255 ❑ Adopted ❑ Adopted as Amended --.....-.._.._.__......................_...._...._..........._.............__. _............._.._.------------- ❑ Defeated Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent .......:......... ..... ❑ Tabled Sarah E.Nappa ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ .__.._._............._: _. _._.............. .._..__..__.------..—__....__._... _ ---......._...__..._._.__. ❑ Withdrawn Greg Doroski [ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supervisor's Appt =- - — Brian O.Mealy ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt — ❑ Rescinded Jill Doherty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ . .........-----._..._...................................- --..—. ...............................-------- —._..._....._.................._......._....q----------- ..__.—._..............;.... .... _._..._ ❑ Town Clerk's Appt Louisa P.Evans ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt ------._....................................-...._..----._...____..........._.. -— ._....._...........e..._...... _.. ----.—.._..._........_.-........... ------ -..._.— Scott A.Russell ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Action __ �..__.. _.__—._._................__.......___.. __ _..---..__..........._........__ _�.—_.....__....__.. ❑ Lost _............_..... ------------- 2023-256 --2023-256 CATEGORY.• Bond DEPARTMENT.- Town Clerk Bond Resolution-Land Acquisition BOND RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK, ADOPTED FEBRUARY 14, 2023, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS IN A PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,400,000 TO FINANCE THE ACQUISITION OF LAND KNOWN AS 41245 ROUTE 25, PECONIC, STATING THE ESTIMATED MAXIMUM COST THEREOF IS $1,400,000 AND APPROPRIATING SAID AMOUNT FOR SUCH PURPOSE THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, IN THE COUNTY.OF SUFFOLK, NEW YORK, HEREBY RESOLVES (by the favorable vote of not less than two-thirds of all the members of said Town Board) AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Town of Southold, in the County of Suffolk, New York (herein called the "Town"), is hereby authorized to issue bonds in a principal amount not to exceed $1,400,000 pursuant to the Local Finance Law, constituting Chapter 33-a of the Consolidated Laws of the State of New York (herein called the "Law"), to finance the acquisition of land known as 41245 Route 25, Peconic,NY SCTM 1000-86-1-3.1, in the Town. Section 2. The estimated maximum cost thereof, including preliminary costs and costs incidental thereto and the financing thereof, is $1,400,000 and said amount is hereby appropriated for such purpose. -The plan of financing includes the issuance of bonds in a principal amount not to exceed $1,400,000 to finance said appropriation, the levy and collection of taxes on all the taxable real property in the Town to pay the principal of said bonds and the interest thereon as the same shall become due and payable. - Section 2. Bonds of the Town in the principal amount of$1,400,000 are hereby authorized to be issued pursuant to the provisions of the Local Finance Law, constituting Chapter 33-a of the Consolidated Laws of the State of New York (herein called the "Law"),to finance said appropriation. Section 3. The following additional matters are hereby determined and declared: (a) The period of probable usefulness applicable to the object or purpose for which said bonds are authorized to be issued, within the limitations of Section 11.00 a. 21 of the Law, is thirty (30)years. (b) The proceeds of the bonds herein authorized and any bond anticipation notes issued in anticipation of said bonds may be applied to reimburse the Town for expenditures made after the effective date of this resolution for the purpose for which said bonds are authorized. The foregoing statement of intent with respect to reimbursement is made in conformity with Treasury Regulation Section 1.150-2 of the United States Treasury Department. (c) The proposed maturity of the bonds authorized by this resolution will exceed five (5)years. Section 4. Each of the bonds authorized by this resolution and any bond anticipation notes issued in anticipation of the sale of said bonds shall contain the recital of validity as prescribed by Section 52.00 of the Law and said bonds and any notes issued in anticipation of said bonds shall be general obligations of the Town, payable as to both principal and interest by general tax upon all the "taxable real property within the Town. The faith and credit of the Town are hereby irrevocably pledged to the punctual payment of the principal of and interest on said bonds and any notes issued in anticipation of the sale of said bonds and provision shall be made annually in the budget of the Town by appropriation for (a) the amortization and redemption of the bonds and any notes in anticipation thereof to mature ,in such year and (b) the payment of interest to be due and payable in such year. Section 5. Subject to the provisions -of this resolution and of the Law and pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.00 of the Law relative to the authorization of bonds with substantially level or declining annual debt service, Section 30.00 relative to the.authorization of the issuance of bond anticipation notes and Section 50.00 and Sections 56.00 to 60.00 and Section 168.00 of the Law, the powers and duties of the Town Board relative to authorizing bond anticipation notes and prescribing the terms, form and contents and as to the sale and issuance of the bonds herein authorized, and of any bond anticipation notes issued in anticipation of said bonds, and the renewals of said bond anticipation notes, and as to the execution of agreements for credit enhancements, are hereby delegated to the Supervisor, the chief fiscal officer of the Town. Section 6. The validity of the bonds authorized by this resolution, and of any notes issued in anticipation of the sale of said bonds, may be contested only if: (a) such obligations are authorized for an object or purpose for which the Town is not authorized to expend money, or (b) the provisions of law which should be complied with at the date of publication of such resolution, or a summary thereof, are not substantially complied with, and an action, suit or proceeding contesting such validity is commenced within twenty days after the date of such publication, or (c) such obligations are authorized in violation of the provisions of the constitution. Section 7. This bond resolution is subject to a permissive referendum and the Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed, within ten (10) days after the adoption of this resolution, to publish or cause to be published, in full, in the official newspaper of the Town, having a general circulation within said Town, and posted on the sign board of the Town maintained pursuant to the Town Law, a Notice in substantially the following form appearing in Exhibit A hereto. Section 8. The Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed, after said bond resolution shall take effect, to cause said bond resolution to be published, in summary, in the official newspaper of the Town, having a general circulation within said Town, together with a Notice in substantially the form as provided by Section 81.00 of the Law. EXHIBIT A (Below is the Notice for Publication and Posting) TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 14, 2023, the Town Board of the Town of Southold, in the County of Suffolk,New York, adopted a bond resolution entitled: "Bond Resolution of the Town of Southold, New York, adopted February 14, 2023, authorizing the issuance of bonds in a principal amount not to exceed $1,400,000 to finance the acquisition of land known as 41245 Route 25, Peconic, stating the estimated maximum cost thereof is $1,400,000 and appropriating said amount for such purpose," an abstract of which bond resolution concisely stating the purpose and effect thereof, being as follows: FIRST: AUTHORIZING the Town of Southold,New York to issue bonds in a principal amount not to exceed $1,400,000 pursuant to the Local Finance Law of the State of New York, to finance the acquisition of land known as 41245 Route 25, Peconic,NY SCTM 1000-86-1-3.1, in the Town. SECOND: STATING that the estimated maximum cost thereof, including preliminary costs and costs incidental thereto and the financing thereof, is $1,400,000; appropriating said amount for such purpose; and STATING that the plan of financing includes the issuance of bonds in a principal amount not to exceed $1,400,000 to finance said appropriation, and the levy and collection of taxes on all the taxable real property in the Town to pay the principal of said bonds and the interest thereon as the same shall become due and payable; THIRD: DETERMINING and STATING that the period of probable usefulness applicable to the object or purpose for which said bonds are authorized to be issued is thirty (30) years; the proceeds of said bonds and any bond anticipation notes issued in anticipation thereof may be'applied to reimburse the Town for expenditures made after the effective date of this bond resolution for the purposes for which said bonds are authorized; and the proposed,maturity of said bonds will exceed five (5)years; FOURTH: ' DETERMINING that said bonds and any bond anticipation notes issued in anticipation of said bonds and the renewals of said bond anticipation notes shall be general obligations of the Town; and PLEDGING to their payment the faith and credit of the Town; FIFTH: DELEGATING to the Supervisor the powers and duties as to the issuance of said bonds and any bond anticipation notes issued in anticipation of said bonds, or the renewals thereof, and SIXTH: DETERMINING that the bond resolution is subject to a permissive referendum. DATED: February 14, 2023 Denis Noncarrow Town Clerk ✓Vote Record'-Resolution RES-2023-256 ❑ Adopted ❑ Adopted as Amended -.. ..._........ ........................._......---- ------.. _....._ ❑ Defeated Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent .._................._...........--.-._....--------.............- - . .:........................................_... ❑ Tabled Sarah E.Nappa ` ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ....._......._ ...._.._... --_.._..-- E ---- --._._...__.._...................................................._.._..__.._._._.;.....----- - ❑ Withdrawn GregDoroski El ❑ ❑ ❑ -----...-...._..........._ ... _ -------.._........._... ❑ Supervisor's Appt --- j--- ❑ Brian O.Mealy ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt ❑ Rescinded Jill Doherty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Town Clerk's Appt Louisa P.Evans — ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt -......---...---- - ...- --....�..._....._ -- ............._..__....._....._.__...-----+---------.............. --- Scott A.Russell ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Action ❑ Lost 2023-257 CATEGORY.• Budget Modification DEPARTMENT.• Accounting 2022 Budget Modification -Accounting Financial Impact: To cover Single Audit expenditures RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby modifies the 2022 General Fund Whole Town budget as follows: From: A.1310.4.500.100 Bond Counsel Fees $3,000 Total $3,000 To: A.1320.4.500.300 Accountants $3,000 Total $3,000 ✓Vote Record-Resolution RES-2023-257 . - ❑ Adopted ❑ Adopted as Amended -- ❑ Defeated Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent ❑ Tabled Sarah E.Nappa ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Withdrawn Greg Doroski ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supervisor's Appt --._......_..............------- ---.._..--- .._.......... -... .—_........._....._—.._.............................__...----...._._ _........ ---_._...._ ......_.......---................ _ Brian O.Mealy ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tax Receiver's Appt ❑ Rescinded Jill Doherty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ._._................. ---- _..--- ..._..............._..._........_....--- --- - .._._—.. ❑ Town Clerk's Appt Louisa P.Evans j ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Supt Hgwys Appt Scott A.Russell ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Action .........._.._............_.................. — _............. 0 Lost VI. Public Hearings PH 2/28 9:00 Am -MSK Realty LLC - CEA PH 2/28 4:30 Pm - Southview Custom Homes Two,Inc 'f FILED : SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 01/13/2023 05 : 29 P INDEX NO. 601105/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/13/2023 r , EXHIBIT A. BOARD OF TRUSTEES ' DECISION 12/14/22 [FILED : SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 01/13/2023 05 : 29 P INDEX N0. 601105/2023\ NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/13/2023 t Glenn Goldsmith,President ��`a0F D�TTown Hall Annex A.Nicholas Krupski,Vice President A. Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Eric Sepenoski .� Southold,New York 11971 Liz Gillooly ' , : •f Telephone(631)765-1892 Elizabeth Peeples �� `l � Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 27, 2022 Tom Wolpert Young &Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: MKS REALTY, LLC 1925 NORTH SEA DRIVE, SOUTHOLD SCTM# 1000-54-4-20 Dear Mr. Wolpert: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, December 14, 2022 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Young &Young on behalf of MKS REALTY, LLC applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, and Chapter 111 of the Southold Town Code, Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas, application dated November 18, 2021, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator recommended that the proposed applications be found Inconsistent with the LWRP, and specifically Inconsistent with the following coastal policies: Policy 4 - Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion; 1. Avoid development other than water-dependent uses in coastal hazard areas. Locate new development which is not water-dependent as far away from coastal hazard areas as practical. r AFILED : SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 01/13/2023 05 : 29 PM INDEX NO. 601105/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/13/2023 2 a. NO DEVELOPMENT is permitted in natural-protective feature areas, except as specifically allowed under the relevant portions of 6.NYCRR 505.8. b. Avoid hazards by siting structures to maximize the distance from Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas. 1. THE ENTIRE PARCEL IS LOCATED IN THE COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREA and the primary dune, a natural protective feature. No new development is permitted on a primary dune. 2. The entire structure is located within a VE El 13 flood zone.`VE coastal areas are subject to high-velocity water including waves, defined by the one percent annual chance flood and wave effects three feet or greater. This means that the flood has a one percent chance of being mei;or exceeded in any given year. 3: The parcel and any development on the parcel will be adversely impacted by sea level rise over time. Policy 4.2 Protect.and restore natural protective features,, Maximize the protective capabilities of natural protective features by avoiding alteration or inten`erence with shorelines in a natural condition; and WHEREAS, On October 17, 2007, asite.visit of the area was conducted by representatives of the Trustees, the LWRP coordinator, and NYS DEC Environmental Specialist who collectively confirmed that the actions proposed on a neighboring parcel, more.landward than the proposed,actions herein, were entirely located seaward of the CEHA line and within a primary dune; and WHEREAS, the Conservation Advisory Council resolved to NOT support the , application, as the proposed setbacks are too close to the wetland boundary within the primary and secondary dune, and within a flood zone. They noted the environmentally sensitive area, and any development of the property would deplete the natural habitat. WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on August 17, 2022 and December 14, 2022, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members.have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, [FILED : SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 01/13/2023 2023 05 : 29, P INDEX NO: , 601105/2023\, NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/13/2023 3 M WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the structure, as applied for does not comply with the standards set forth in Southold Town Code Chapter 275-12A.'Adversely affect the wetlands of-the Town, B. Cause damage from erosion, turbidity or siltation; D. Adversely affect fish, shellfish or other beneficial marine-organisms, aquatic,wildlife and vegetation or the natural habitat thereof, E. Increase the danger of flood and storm-tide damage; H. Weaken or undermine the lateral support of other lands in the vicinity; I.. Otherwise adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the Town;and J: Adversely affect the aesthetic value of the wetland-and adjacent areas; and WHEREAS, some of the proposed structure, as applied"forJs located in-a•primary dune area with the proposed deck and proposed pool encroaching seaward of the proposed dwelling into an environmentally sensitive area valuabletothe people of the Town of SoutlVd, and as applied for does notcomply with: 111-9 Issuance*of'Permit. A coastal erosion management permit wiffbe issued only with a,fndingcby the Administrator that the proposed regulated activity: A.- Is reasonabW and necessary, considering reasonable altematives to the proposed activity and the extent to which the proposed activity requires a shoreline location, B: Is not likely to,cause-a measurable increase in erosion at the proposed site and at other locations. C. Prevents, if possible, or minimizes adverse effects on natural protective features and their functions and protective values, existing erosion protection structures and natural resources;`and, 111-13. Dune Area A. 4n primary'-dune areas: (1) Excavating, grading or mining of primary dunes is prohibited, (2) Clean sand of a compatible type and size is the only material which may be deposited. Any deposition requires a coastal erosion management permit, (3) All depositions must be`vegetatively.stabilized using species tolerant of the-conditions at the site'and must be placed so as to increase the'size of, or restore; a dune or dune area; (4)Active bird-nestingiand breeding areas must hot be disturbed; unless such disturbance'is pursuant'to a,specific wildlife management activity approved, in writing, by the Department; (5) No'rmaja additions to existing structures are allowed on primary dunes pursuant to a coastal erosion management permit and subject to permit conditions concerning the location, design and potential impacts of the structure on'the primary.dune; (6) Stone revetments or other erosion protection structures compatible with primary dunes will onlybe allowed at the waterward toe of primary dunes and must,not interfere with the exchange of sand between primary dunes and their fronting beaches, and f WHEREAS, the project, as applied for,'is not permitted under.Chapter 111 insofar as it is located in a primary dune area; and WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing on August 17, 2022, the owner of that neighboring parcel, Robert Bombara, of 1725 North Sea Drive, testified that the Trustees must follow precedence which established, in a prior application before Trustees, during the application process and appeal before the Southold Town Board;through testimony taken before the Board, the location of the primary dune in this particular area, and no structure shall be located seaward of the primary dune line; and 4FILED : SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 01/13/2023 05 :29 P INDEX NO. 601105/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/13/2023 4 WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the request, as applied for, will have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, and, adversely weaken or undermine the lateral support of other lands in the vicinity NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that for foregoing reasons, and because the proposed action is located within the coastal erosion hazard area and in a primary dune area, and because the proposed action is not permitted in such areas pursuant to Chapters 275 and 111 of the Town Code, that the Trustees deem the proposed project to be impermissible under Chapter 275 and Chapter 11.1, and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that for the foregoing reasons, the Board of Trustees DENIES the Wetland .and Coastal Erosion Permit application of MKS REALTY, LLC to construct a two- story 3,053 sf footprint dwelling with garage; a proposed 21'10"x 11'9" (253.5 sf) seaward bedroom balcony with railing system; a proposed 10'4"x 20'2" (191.7 sf) mezzanine level bedroom balcony & railing system; a privacy screen wall along the west side, and a 6'wide spiral staircase to ground; a 1,484 sf raised deck with a 448 sf pool on seaward side, privacy screening along portion of east side, a 3'9" wide stairs with railings to ground to west, and a 3'6" stairs with railing to ground to east; proposed 10' wide bar/grill area on pool deck; 513 sf of non-pervious front entry stairs; proposed 3,183 sf of stone blend driveway; 1,200 gallon underground propane tank, new I/A OWTS sanitary system, ie. one (1) 500 gallon wastewater treatment unit and four (4) 8.51 by 2' effect. depth sanitary leaching galleys; public water service connection; new storm water control structures for roof runoff and driveway runoff; approximately 480 cy of clean material from the excavated areas will be used to fill the site to the proposed grades; and all mechanical equipment (ie. A/C unit) to be located above the second- story structure; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by R. Shatarah Consulting Engineers, P.C., last dated October 11, 2022. This determination should not be considered a determination made for any other Department or Agency, which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. Very truly yours, Glenn Goldsmith, President Board of Trustees GG/dd OFFICE LOCATION: �* q Sol MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex °� 6:`. P.O.Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 ',i,yj Southold,NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) r; Telephone- 631765-1938 Southold, NY 11971 A 'OWN P C®UfdT'R j LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Glenn Goldsmith, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, AICP LWRP Coordinator , Date: August 9, 2022 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for MKS REALTY, LLC SCTM# 1000-54-4-20 Young &Young on behalf of MKS REALTY, LLC requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to construct a two-story 2,445sq.ft. footprint dwelling with garage; a proposed 21'10"x11'9" (253.5sq.ft.) seaward bedroom balcony with railing system; a proposed 10'4"x20'2" (191.7sq.ft.) mezzanine level bedroom balcony, railing system, a privacy screen wall along west side, and a 6' wide spiral staircase to ground; a 1,218.8sq.ft. elevated deck with a 522sq.ft. pool on seaward side, privacy screening along portion of east side, a 3'9"wide stairs with railings to ground to west and a 3'6" stairs with railings to ground to east; proposed 10'wide bar/grill area on pool deck; seaward of pool to the east off pool patio, a proposed 203.6sq.ft. elevated (ranging from±7.5'to 10' above natural grade) catwalk leading to a 127.9sq.ft. open air gazebo with flat roof over, 3'6"wide stairs with railings to ground, and 110.6sq.ft. storage area under gazebo; proposed 663sq.ft. of non- pervious front entry stairs; proposed 4,095sq.ft. of stone blend driveway; proposed 1,200 gallon underground propane tank; new IIA OWTS sanitary system, i.e. one (1) 500 gallon wastewater treatment unit and six (6) 8.5' long by 2' effect. depth sanitary leaching galleys; public water service connection; new storm water control structures for roof runoff and driveway runoff, approximately 690 cubic yards of clean material from the excavated areas will be used to fill the site to the proposed grades; and all mechanical equipment(i.e.A/C unit), to be located above the second- story structure. Located: 1925 North Sea Drive, Southold. SCTM# 1000-54-4-20 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposal is INCONSISTENT with LWRP Policies and with the LWRP. Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. 1. Avoid development other than water-dependent uses in coastal hazard areas. Locate new development which is not water-dependent as far away from coastal hazard areas as practical. a. No development is permitted in natural protective feature areas, except as specifically allowed under the relevant portions of 6 NYCRR 505.8. b. Avoid hazards by siting structures to maximize the distance from Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas. 1. The entire parcel is located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area iAY# P•t'I'1 fV' 1 111r ^^fy�r 'a'y �YIi'ri r I 1.y —\ r I �y I P rJ try M� /*IP Wi, v a f` it t 1' I, `YH Suffolk County, UConn/CTDEER, Esri, HERE, Garmin, GeoTechnola ies, i... r r 7 d * r The purpose of Chapter 111, COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREAS is to regulate, in coastal areas, land use and development activities so as to minimize or prevent damage or destruction to man-made property, natural protective features and other natural resources and to protect human life. In addition, the purpose of Chapter 111 is to regulate new construction or placement of structures in order to place them a safe distance from coastal hazard areas. § 111-4. Purpose. The Town of Southold hereby assumes the responsibility and authority to implement and administer a Coastal Erosion Management Program within its jurisdiction pursuant to Article 34 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law. In addition, it is the purpose of this chapter to: B. Regulate, in coastal areas subject to coastal flooding and erosion, land use and development activities so as to minimize or prevent damage or destruction to man-made property, natural protective features and other natural resources and to protect human life. C. Regulate new construction or placement of structures in order to place them a safe distance from areas of active erosion and the impact of coastal storms to ensure that these structures are not prematurely destroyed or damaged due to improper siting, as well as to prevent damage to natural protective features and other natural resources. 2. The entire structure is located within a VE EL 13 flood zone. VE coastal areas are subject to high-velocity water including waves; defined by the 1-percent annual chance flood and wave effects 3 feet or greater. This means that the flood has a 1% chance of being met or exceeded in any given year. � •. laa�� I I . •Ye"s" a yl7�s a o,ora e�Mazro rlr,� I °' v� ° .Pw + f ,h w, � �F��d�,�@ u �I F II r�'If• p. ' • ^ �°x3,�rfa � ?��' �a:��•�j�s r tm°I eta �p`;'�,� ��t.ryx i. ''+h,^.iY,�u '�� y' ��'h ,, f,.•�„7�'i�'t �;„ wa;"�` �',w �l;.. �c ar7•� f o`� .:I''' ��ftS�'te.� ^t. h ,�roy,tmtgryyC 3f` ;,�Eifd'^:'/�'a'• .� r,•„.� I'.�r.�`��'i .„d, �” ilw�,i',,I„ � �r59J.. i + Y• rs'/"'m ' f;i 4�. 'A fi ; G.kT�2•Y�MI tt�( Y`�"'TG ./A 4'p� f I� �Prldd E Y35> ,t t � t✓ f fi+y a =«fp�� � a tiir + `' si 7vn�°AF r+rEt'�i� 4 ,�>a,{,• X,=� ' !, n� I ,�t 'fit ,,-`� rw,s' y v j.;�.;•�,e•e�`„ i.++p,��r r 9 §,i r !�- � '�'§n: ,g a o n' •v i"� �r.q2;,,�*_„ a ➢�' �r: �:�'�G•h•:?r. ��t. - _$ , '^ J i � tin,/.`� , �a'Yy,^^,p`^�� 6m, �yr�� �ti �!r!g.�anc:VEF7� a` . f}� G�1�{j�• , a_ �a'9i, �y> .w,s `Gfx t�*v-'�� '.0 t'l k,y-#t•S�e�,s !°'9),n f�' Z)�k5 ���y ,''D X• aztr.J,a?+A{ a w, 51:e}Fry f l Ja�}r>� a�""tar' � t,Far k•, r 3r '� 4 3x +e� �'�C�"��r`'� �g"��'� ,-`'�r�ra--t,i,��;' t"���a t.� r¢ ,� nr; r� �• , 7y t , "p:7'{�, w '� Igg}tr 4 � �•t"g<^'sp lr" g �,�,rY �'� C rS � rjq; 'C�k'� CYT d 't r r r r, 51' r �I;.'r ���,,�,� ��fy"`�, 'w'•"•;�a{��6 ,prq,- ° �; ,i�" ur` ° „I § E,'g x.n R��gt4Po, f ry`�� rtb.�{ISI7F +Y 3' t y r7 kny,R r br ��--`*7.k`C•..:=M1 zrwc�'�!.,vr d�Nt �{ �hn'��'��.f'�a���i ;� ,���' `�'N I P »ma4"'tliln k�lff .Y7s" '"�"" w,r:r aI^,I w' J �E� ging dd PP , ht dMt ICU. w#; t I J_ YE L � z d�� sT. ai e""6^�7 faySw L F"s �¢ xi I fix" i x 1. �hy,3 /� '�t" " ;✓L 'C ,c�✓-<r ` 1.0 e WIN,, ,(` GI ^1 1kr ,. °. y" Ar"tw�!4+ � A�g ^' ,� ,e. ,�A;�r�,;� qgg fie Qlati M 4 Xrrnr' u �ec�n+ ¢¢ ➢ W�y` �� r �a •'� V' r Y+ c'.++� R$f Y}Fi .t R •�'a I ! S F ��P. p` ze '{>+.(y�=� I m p { i t Qi ' .'� 4'' ��t�..��"WI ��,`�"�d r x ' �'ff}£�7�1..�u•`..�� Cy°�'S;p".� af•t". � � A+`� 4a•�'�r��lj�"Y dk�+��i��ct'}� �^�.1�� !'f'�J;� �_�w 7 f ��^ II '1r`�.wfr 11i �� !1 b „f �p tr� 3 ��r �' �s^i �i` Y i .a v � ' 1 i �Jy1+°� � ° �`• + ra�,�a<r� t'st" ,� �1r � i r�• xtt� y LS 9W'wt a� '� �''fr'� ¢ �� ���x �„i � ��',',r L,�.x 7J d� •711.n�xEikl';iP f�:4� ra:b ��, r 4. The parcel will be adversely impacted by sea level rise over time. 4.2 Protect and restore natural protective features. Natural protective geologic features provide valuable protection and should be protected, restored and enhanced. Destruction or degradation of these features should be discouraged or prohibited. A. No development is permitted in natural protective feature areas, except as specifically allowed under the relevant portions of 6 NYCRR 505.8. B. Maximize the protective capabilities of natural protective features by. 1. avoiding alteration or interference with shorelines in a natural condition The proposed actions are located entirely within the coastal erosion hazard area and the primary dune, a natural protective feature. A primary dune is defined in § 111-6 Definitions as a natural protective feature. NATURAL PROTECTIVE FEATURE-- A nearshore area, beach, bluff, primary dune, secondary dune or marsh and their vegetation. PRIMARY DUNE-- The most waterward major dune where there are two or more parallel dunes within a coastal area. Where there is only one dune present, it is the 'primary"one. Occasionally one or more relatively small dune formations exist waterward of the primary dune. These smaller formations will be considered to be part of the "primary dune"for the purposes of this chapter. The waterward limit of a primary dune is the landward limit of its fronting beach. The landward limit of the primary dune is 25 feet landward of its landward toe. A site visit of this area was conducted on October 17, 2007. In attendance at the site visit among others,were representatives of the Town of Southold Board of Trustees, LWRP Coordinator Mark Terry and NYS DEC's Environment Program Specialist Robert McDonough,which confirmed that the proposed actions are entirely located seaward of the CEHA line and within a primary dune. This determination still applies. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Honorable Lori Hulse, Attorney J s RESOLUTION 2011768 ADOPTED DOC ID: 6510 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO.2011-68 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON JANUARY 4,2011: WHEREAS,the Board of Trustees on October 15,2008,denied the application of Robert Bombara(the"Applicant") for a permit to construct a single-family residence on the premises known as 1725 North Sea Drive, Southold,New York,under the Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas Law(the"Law")of the Town of Southold;and WHEREAS,on November 12,2008,Mr. Bombara submitted an application to the Town Board of the Town of Southold, as the governing Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review, seeking to appeal the determination of the Board of Trustees,or in the alternative, seeking a variance from the requirements of the Law;and WHEREAS,the Town Board did transmit a copy of the instant appeal to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation; and WHEREAS,on January 20,2009,February 3,2009,June 2,2009, and September 7, 2010,the Town Board conducted duly noticed public hearings on the instant appeal with opportunity for all interested parties to be heard; and WHEREAS,that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby finds that the conditional approval of this application is classified as an Unlisted Action pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations, 6 NYCRR, Section 617;and WHEREAS,the Town of Southold is the only involved agency pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations; and WHEREAS,the Town Board of the Town of Southold accepted the Short Environmental Assessment Form for this action; and WHEREAS,the application has been reviewed pursuant to Chapter 268 (Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program ("LWRP"));now,therefore,be it RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold does hereby adopt the Findings and Determination dated January 4,2011,and conditionally approves the Variance Application of Robert Bombara in accordance with the conditions set forth therein; and be it further Resolution 2011-68 Board Meeting of January 4,2011 RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby finds no significant impact on the environment and declares a negative declaration pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations for this action; and be it further RESOLVED that the Town Board had determined that,with conditions,this action is consistent with the LWRP;and be it further RESOLVED that this Determination shall not affect or deprive any other agency of its properly asserted jurisdiction, separate and apart from the proceedings under the Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas Law considered herein. Elizabeth A.Neville Southold Town Clerk RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Christopher Talbot, Councilman SECONDER:Louisa P. Evans,Justice AYES: Ruland,Orlando,Talbot,Krupski Jr.,Evans,Russell Updated: 1/3/2011 10:32 AM by Lynne Krauza Page 2 t TOWN BOARD COASTAL EROSION HAZARD BOARD OF REVIEW TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -------------------------------------------- In the matter of the Application of ROBERT BOMBARA 1725 North Sea Drive DECISION Southold,NY SCTM#1000-54-04-19 -------------------------------------------- FINDINGS AND DETERNIINATION Based upon the application, documents contained in the Board's file, site inspections and testimony received.at the,public hearings held on January 20, 2009, February 3, 2009, and June 2,2009 and September 7,2010,the Town Board finds and determines as follows: ISSUE Applicant has filed an application with the Town Board, as the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review.(the"Board"), dated November 12,2008,requesting the following relief: 1. 'A reversal of the Board of Trustees' ("Trustees") October 15, 2008 determination denying the applicant's application for a permit under Chapter 111 Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas of the Town Code,pursuant to the provisions of§111-25. 2. In the alternative, and should the Board affirm the Trustees determination, the applicant has requested a variance of the provisions of Chapter 111 of the Code as provided in §111-20. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY A. Description of the property: The property that is the subject of this application is located on the seaward (north)side of North Sea Drive and is between the Long Island Sound and North Sea Drive. It is approximately 24,979 sq. ft. or .6 acre and is located in the R-40 zone,with approximately 100 ft. of road frontage on North Sea Drive. Unlike many other properties in this area which are developed with single family residences,this lot has never been developed and remains an unspoiled beach area. As confirmed by the Board of Trustees, and acknowledged by the applicant, the property is located entirely within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area("CEHA") as established by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. -1- The applicant who purchased the property in 2006 is proposing to construct a single-family residence on this lot with associated garage,pool,water supply and sewage disposal system on this property. B. Trustees Procedural History: I. Applications The applicant first appeared before the Trustees with an application filed in October 2006 which requested a CEHA permit allowing the construction of a 4,138 sq. ft. 2-story house(5-6 bedrooms),with 484 sq. ft. detached garage and 800 sq. ft.pool entirely within the CEHA. In its determination dated December 13,2006,the Trustees denied the application, without prejudice,on the following grounds: 1. The'Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council did not support the application because the development was proposed seaward.of the CEHA and is prohibited under Chapter 111. 2. The LWRP coordinator recommended that the proposal be found inconsistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program as no construction is permitted seaward of the CEHA and that the proposal was inconsistent with policy standard 4.1, 4.2, and 6.3. 3. That the proposal was located entirely within a natural protective(beach) area; 4. That the proposal was located in an environmentally sensitive area containing valuable habitat valued by the Town for nesting areas for threatened and endangered species and for recharge of the aquifer and the proposed construction would negatively impact an environmentally sensitive area. Thereafter and in July 2007,the applicant revised its plans and submitted three "alternative"proposals to the Board of Trustees as follows: 1. Alternate 1: 5-6 bedroom house comparable in size to the alternative presented to the Board in 2006,with the garage'attached and an 800 sq. ft. pool on the seaward side of the home. 2. Alternate 2: 5-6 bedroom house comparable in size to the alternative presented to the Board in 2006,with the garage attached and an 800 sq. ft. pool on the seaward side of the home(sanitary system and shape of the house is different) 3. Alternate 3: A 5-6 bedroom two-story house(approximately 5,238 sq. ft.)on piles with a 512 sq. ft. pool surrounded by an approximate 30 ft. x 45 ft. brick patio. H. Documentation in the Trustees Record Additionally,the applicant submitted the following materials in support of the application: -2- 1. A report of Dru Associates,Inc. dated October 17,2007 discussing the environmental impacts from the proposal and concluding that the proposed activity complies with the.permit issuance standards set forth in 6 N.Y.C.R.R. Part 505•and that the issuance of a permit for development of the property is "compatible with the CEHA and Tidal Wetlands protection, since the resources protected by either of these programs will remain unaltered by the proposed home. 2. A report from First Coastal, dated October 17,2007, concluding that the section of shoreline upon which this property is located is"dominated by low profile beach ridges that are vegetated by mature shrubs and tree fronted by a sandy beach and(m)atgin of beach grass" 3. An affidavit of John Ehlers, surveyor.attesting that there has been no erosion at the site. 4. A coastal assessment report, dated October 2008 and prepared by Applied Coastal Research stating that.overall,net change in shoreline position since 1955 has been approximately zero,which does not mean the shoreline did not move during this time,but suggests that regardless of variation in shoreline movement during this 52-year period,net shoreline location is generally unchanged._The Bombara property is outside the 50-year wave impact zone. The record before the Trustees also contains a memo data October 2, 2007 from Environmental Technician,Heather Cusack and attached data regarding piping plover nesting in the area of the property. The memo indicates that the attached data show a nest east of Kenny's Beach in 2004 and a 2005 map shows a nest between Kennys and McCabe's beaches. The memo concludes that given the nesting patterns,the parcel is a piping plover habitat. Additionally,the memo points out that the State Department of State included the stretch of beach east to McCabe's beach in the Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife habitat. The record before the Trustees Asp contains a memo discussing the environmental review of the proposal dated September 17, 2007 which indicates that the lot is located in the CEHA and that the natural protective features on site include a beach and primary dune. On April l5, 2008, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation conducted a site visit to the property wherein the DEC confirmed: "that the landward limit line of the natural protective feature area(a.k.a. the CEHA line)was mapped based on the determination that the primary dune was the most landward natural protective feature. North Sea Drive was built on a portion of this primary dune. During the initial mapping phase which occurred over twenty years ago and was concluded by a public hearing,a decision was made to place the CEHA line along the north edge of North Sea Drive instead of continuing further landward to a point 25 feet from the landward toe." 3- : On October 1, 2008,the LWRP Coordinators submitted a written recommendation to the Trustees that the proposed actions were inconsistent with the LWRP standard and that the proposals did not comply with Town Code Chapter 175, Wetlands, and Chapter 111. III. Public Hearing.- Trustees earing:Trustees held a public hearing on this application on August 22,2007 and on October 15, 2008 at which time all those interested were given the opportunity to speak. Peter Danowski, Esq. appeared on behalf of the applicant and presented information in support of the application, the relevant portions of such information is summarized below. Mr. Danowski,pointed out the differences in Alternatives 1 —3 with a prior application to the Trustees by the same applicant that was denied by the Trustees in 2006. Mr. Danowski also set forth certain information regarding the location of the beach area which was verified by the applicant's engineer,Doug Adams of Young& Young. Mr. Danowski also mentioned that the Trustees had granted coastal erosion permits to other property owners in the community, namely,Paskov, Betsch,Von Zubin, Pearlstein,Rosicki and Sonnenbohi;and requested that the records of each of those permit applications be incorporated into the Trustees record by reference. Additionally, several'members of the public and surrounding community testified in opposition to the proposal. Those comments in pertinent part included the following: 1. That the proposal was inconsistent with the LWRP. 2. The Conservation Advisory Committee's refusal to conduct a full review of the proposal because of its location seaward of the coastal erosion hazard line. 3. Trustees should not allow nearby pre-existing construction to legitimize,new construction that is not compliant. 4. The applicant did not make substantive changes to the plan,and therefore should not be considered by the Trustees. At the October 15,2008 hearing,Mr. Danowski, again appeared on behalf of the applicant and presented the testimony of Mark,Burns stating that this particular beach community has experienced accretion as opposed to erosion. Again, several members of the community presented information in opposition to the application including: the'potential impact of the rise in sea level and global climate change on the'storm surge in the area and erosion;the proposal is located in a primary It is noted that the applicant filed an appeal to the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of the 2006 Trustees determination which was never decided,and is deemed moot by the applicant's submission of an alternate application to the Trustees. -4- t dune area on a rare virgin beach; and there are endangered species and rare wetlands located on the property. 1Y Trustees.Determination, On October 15,2008,the Trustees issued a determination denying the Applicant's request(for all three alternatives)for a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Permit based upon the following: 1. The Conservation Advisory Counsel provided comment that the location of the.Coastal Erosion Hazard line is landward of all proposed activities, and, as such, a full review of the application could not be conducted.. 2. The LWRP Coordinator recommended that the application be found inconsistent with the LWRP because the proposal was inconsistent with Policy 4.1,4.2, 6,and 6.3. 3. The Board conducted a site visit with the LWRP coordinator, and the New York State Department of Environmental Specialist Robert McDonough, which confirmed that the proposed actions were entirely located seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard line and within a - primary dune and a primary dune is a natural protective feature 4. The proposed structures, as applied for,are located on the natural protective feature of a primary dune and governed by §111-13 which prohibits all activities'in such areas. C. The Town Board proceeding On November 12,2008, the Applicant timely filed an appeal of the Trustee's determination pursuant to Town Code 111-25 and in the alternative seeking a variance from the standards set forth in the'Code with the,Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review(the Board). The Board held duly noticed public hearings on January 20,2009, February 3, 2009, June 2, 2009 and September 7,2010 at which time all interested parties were-given the opportunity to present testimony on the application. Peter Danowski, Esq., appeared on behalf of the applicant and presented testimony on both the appeal and variance request. The testimony presented on the appeal reiterated the information provided to the Trustees as set forth in Section III above. With respect to the variance application, Mr. Danowski requested that the Board consider the purpose of Coastal Erosion Hazard Law,i.e.to protect property owners from erosion in conjunction with the expert reports entered into the record indicating that this sound front community'has accreted. Additionally,Mr. Danowski also incorrectly noted that the Town is required,to update the Coastal Erosion Map every 10 years which it has,. not done? ' 2 The Town does not have the authority-nor the jurisdiction to change the Coastal Erosion Hazard Map. Pursuant to Chapter 111,the Town must follow the map as established by the NYS DEC. -5- Y Aram Terchunian,a coastal geologist, also testified for the applicant that the there is no documented evidence of sea level rise in this area and, as such, it should not be considered by the Board. Mr. Terchunian also testified that applicant meets all the criteria for a variance,that the area where the applicant's property is located is dominated by a series of beach ridges that have been deposited over decades and centuries and that granting a variance will not destabilize the dune system. Members of the community also provided testimony in opposition to proposal including: 1. Requests that the ITown Board take into account the rising sea Ievel and that the coastal erosion hazard line may be moved further inland in the future. 2. The existence of homes in the area, does not provide a sound basis for granting an approval. 3. A primary dune is a dynamic system and is a natural protective feature under the Town Code. 4. The approval of this proposal with set a precedent for the undeveloped lots in the area. 5. Further construction within the maritime freshwater inter-dunal swale that exists between Goldsmith Inlet and Hortons Point weakens the structure of the land and, as happened in East Hampton, could cause houses to go into the water. On April 3, 2009 the Applicant submitted additional material into the record, though the record was closed, and requested that a decision be issued. As the record was re-opened by the Town Board as discussed below, the content of this letter and its attachment were permitted to enter the record. Attached to this letter was a report of Dru Associates, Inc., Ecological Consultants, which purportedly addressed the public comments. Most notably,Dru Associates March 1.7,2009 report acknowledged the presence of natural protective features on site and generally stated,without any support or indication of where the features were located that the function of the natural protective features would not be altered. Upon review of the record and prior to issuing a determination;the Town Board on April 21,2009,noted certain deficiencies in the record with respect to the application and determined to re-open the public hearing, to permit the additional materials submitted by the applicant on April 3,2009 and to enlist the services of En-Consultants, Inc., Robert E. Herrmann, Coastal Management Specialist("Herrmann")to evaluate potential impacts of construction on erosion trends and on the natural protective features on the property. More specifically,the Town Board requested additional information with respect to whether the proposed construction was located within a natural protective feature,whether any construction could be located outside the natural protective feature; what impacts the proposed and/or any construction might have on erosion trends and the site's natural protective feature and its functions and protective values; and whether and how(i.e. via location, scope design, etc.)those impacts could be avoided or minimized. -6_.. On June 2, 2009,.the Town Board re-opened the public hearing and the record to address the above issues that were not adequately addressed at the January 20,2009, February 3,2009 public hearings. A letter from the applicant's representative dated May 29, 2010 was accepted into the record and noted that the applicant objected to the Town Board's reopening of the hearing. Additionally,a recommendation from Herrmann dated,April 20, 2009 was entered into the record which noted a critical deficiency in the record,most notably that the applicant's site plan did not depict the most landward natural protective feature on the site and therefore,that the Town Board could not ascertain the impacts of the proposed construction on the primary dune. Once the landward geomorphic toe and landward regulatory limit of the sand ridge/primary.dune was identified,Herrmann could address the questions identified by the Board. At theJune 2, 2009 meeting the Board directed that deficiencies in the applicant's plan noted by Herrmann be addressed by the applicant. Thereafter,the applicants' representatives and/or technical consultants met at the property on several occasions with the Town's'representative and/or technical consultant to discuss the location landward toe of the natural protective feature. Based upon the agreement between the applicant's consultant and Herrmann of the location of the landward toe of the natural protective feature,the applicant made significant revisions to its plans and, as requested by the Town Board, submitted a an amended application to the Board on July 15,2010, indicated on the Plan as "Alternate 6." This alternative was for an approximately 1700 sq. ft. (footprint) single-family dwelling on pilings with pool,, deck, garage and septic system,with a certain portion of the proposed construction occurring over the landward toe of the natural protective feature indicated on the plan. The revised plan was forwarded to Herrmann and a public hearing was duly noticed and scheduled for September 7,2010. On August 30,2010,the Town Board received a report from its consultant with the following recommendations on the Alternate 6 plan submitted by the applicant on July 16th: 1. At a minimum any development should be limited in scope and situated so as to avoid•all physical encroachment on and disturbance to the geomorphic limits of the primary dune, both during construction and,afterward to avoid displacement and/or degradation of the primary dune and that all construction should be conducted 8-10 feet from the landward toe of the primary.dune. 2. The applicant could relocate and/or downsize the proposed structures and incorporate additional mitigation measures to avoid degradation of the primary dune and therefore the proposal failed to meet the standards for a variance set forth in §111-20. 3. Impacts to natural resources could be mitigated with the installation of leaders, gutters and drywells. 4. Limit removal of natural vegetation and wildlife habitat and the potential introduction of fertilizers by requiring that all undisturbed -7- portions of the site be permanently maintained as.a nondisturbance buffer;requiring that all cleared areas no built upon be restored with native,nonfertilizer-dependent vegetation and maintained as a landscape buffer and prohibiting the use of the such chemicals on the site 5. Additional revisions to the site plan presented by the applicant including the identification of the CEHA boundary; the depiction of the regulatory landward limit of the most landward natural protective feature; verification/update of the FEMA boundaries; depiction of a project limiting fence and staked hay bales along the proposed limits of clearing, grading and ground disturbance. On September 7, 2010,the public hearing on this matter was continued and all interested parties were given the opportunity to speak. Mr. Danowski appeared on behalf of the applicants with certain consultants to address the items raised in the Herrmann report,most notably: 1. That contrary to what was suggested by Herrmann, the County Health Department has the same septic system size requirements for two,three or four bedroom homes and their for downsizing the home would not decrease the size of the septic system and would not allow the applicant to move the home closer to the road. 2. The applicant has proposed a;house on piles and a cantilevered deck to avoid heavy equipment on the primary dune,and so that there would be no'intrusive building of structures within the primary dune area. 3. Mr. Herrmann's report confirmed that there has been no long term erosion on the property. Members of the public again appeared in opposition to the application and reiterated arguments that were made at the prior hearings. The Town Board closed the hearing subject to comment by the applicant on Mr. Herrmann's report and reserving the Town's right to respond. The applicant submitted a response to the Herrmann report by letter dated September 21, 2010 which set forth the following: 1. There was no reasonable alternative site for the applicant to construct a single family dwelling and urging the Board not require that the location of the house be moved so that a variance would be required by the Zoning Board of Appeals, since the Zoning Board had denied a prior variance application to an adjacent homeowner. Additionally,the area bpfween the proposed structure and the road is necessary-to accommodate the installation of a septic system and to provide parking for cars. The applicant also corrected an error in the record,the septic'system proposed is for a 3 bedroom house. -8- 2. The applicant offered to plant supplemental native vegetation to further protect the beach area. The applicant also agreed to erect and maintain a silt fence/hay bale construction barrier to protect the area seaward of the piling foundation. The applicant would also consent to a condition that no mechanical equipment would be allowed seaward of the piling foundation area during the construction activity. The applicant would also be willing to plant vegetation under the cantilevered deck. 3. The.applicant is willing to limit the introduction of fertilizer and other contaminates and will supplement existing seaward vegetation. No clearing will be performed seaward of the construction area. 4. There is no need for approximately 8-10 feet of width on the seaward side of the structures to protect the dune. 5. The applicant also agreed to install leaders gutters and dry wells;to a condition that would require that the undisturbed portion of the site be permanently maintained as a nondisturbance buffer; a requirement that all cleared areas not built upon be restored with native,non-fertilizer-dependent vegetation and maintained as a landscape buffer; and prohibiting the use of such chemicals on the site. 6. The applicant also submitted a revised survey, dated September 21, 2010 with the changes requested in the Herrmann report. On October 4,2010,the Board received a letter from Herrmann that confirmed that all changes requested in the August 30,2010 report had been made by the applicant; that the applicant's consultant had confirmed.that grading restrictions mandated by the County Health Department would prevent the sanitary system from being moved closer to the road and that if the proposed development was going to be moved farther from the primary dune without zoning relief,that the applicant would have to decrease or redesign the structural footprint. Herrmann also notes that the applicant failed to provide any engineering plan and/or construction narrative prepared by a licensed professional to demonstrate and certify how the proposed structures could be installed without breaching the clearing limitation and damaging the dune. No other comments were received and the record was closed on October 5, 2010. Thereafter and on November 12,2010,the Applicant requested that the record be re-opened for the submission of a fetter to the Board dated October 13,2010 regarding certain County Health Department Regulations and a letter from Elderco, Inc., a contractor from Port Jefferson indicating the sequence of construction and how said construction sequence would protect the dune. On November 30,2010,the Town Board,by Resolution No. 2010-942,re-opened the record for thirty days for the limited purpose of permitting the additional information' requested by the Applicant to be entered into the record and considered by this Board and allowing sufficient time for comments responding to the additional information supplied by the Applicant. On December 7, 2010, the Town Board forwarded the additional materials submitted by the Applicant to the Town Engineer and Chief Building Inspector for review and comment. By letter dated December 8,2010, the Town Engineer submitted a response for the record reiterating the recommendation of Herrmann that a minimum setback between eight(8')and ten(10')feet from the landward toe of the dune, despite the proposed construction sequence in the November 8, 2010 letter from Elderco, Inc. The Town Engineer also suggested that the setback include the proposed pool and patio areas and/or any other site improvement that will be constructed with and/or supported by the ground. Finally,the Town Engineer also noted that the proposed cantilevered framing will create the need to access the end of deck framing,the construction of which will ultimately reach out and adversely affect the dune and recommends that all cantilevered construction be limited so that it does not extend over or beyond the designated toe of the dune. On December 28, 2010,the Town Board received a letter from the Kenney's/McCabe's Beach Civic Association stating that the Elderco, Inc. letter submitted by the Applicant that questioned whether said letter would qualify as the requested engineering plan and construction narrative recommended in the October 4, 2010 Herrmann letter,and noting certain alleged errors in the letter. This letter also points out that the content of the Elderco, Inc. letter is so general that it could apply to any building site and that there is no documentation provided by the Applicant to confirm that Elderco, Inc.will perform the proposed work on site. On December' 2010,the record of the proceeding was closed. APPEAL OF THE TRUSTEE'S DETERMINATION The Town Board confirms the determination of the Trustee's decision denying the application for a coastal erosion hazard permit with certain modifications for the'reasons set forth below. The CEHA program sets forth a series of regulated activities that require a coastal erosion hazard permits if such activities are conducted within the CEHA. Regulated activities are defined in §111-6 as: The construction, modification, restoration or placement of a structure, or major addition to a structure, or any action or use of land which materially alters the condition of land, including grading, excavating, dumping, mining, dredging,filling or other disturbance of soil. -10- The construction of a new dwelling, without question, qualifies as a regulated activity. Furthermore,there is no dispute that all proposed activity involved in this application occurs within a designated CEHA and is.seaward of the coastal erosion hazard line. As such,contrary to the applicant's argument that he should not have been required to file an application for a coastal erosion management permit because the project activity is all located beyond 100 feet from the Town defined"beach" area,the applicant was clearly required by the Town Code to obtain a Coastal Erosion Hazard Permit prior to commencing construction on the site. Article 1I of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Chapter of the Town Code sets forth the regulations that apply within coastal erosion areas and requires a permit for regulated activities in §111-8. Section 111-8 is'followed by specific criteria for the issuance of a permit in §111-9. Article II also sets forth additional regulations that apply in specific areas of sensitivity(structural hazard area(§111-10), near shore area(§111-11), beach area(§111-12), dune area(§111-13), and bluff area(§111-14)). If a proposal is located within a specific area of sensitivity,these additional regulations and prohibitions apply. In this instance,the Board of Trustees properly identified the portion of the property impacted by the construction of proposed single family dwelling as entirely within a primary dune area.3 This finding was supported by a letter submitted by the Department of Environmental Conservation to the Trustees stating the following: . . the landward limit line of the natural protective feature area (a.ka. CERA line) was mapped based on the determination that the primary dune was the most landward natural protective feature. As such,the State had drawn the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line based upon the presence of a primary dune. There was no evidence in the record before the Trustees indicating anything to the contrary. The applicant's expert reports also note that the area of the property closest to North Sea Drive contains sand ridges (which qualify as dunes under §111-6). Section 111-13(A) of the Town Code sets forth permitted and prohibited actions in primary dune areas: 1. Excavating, grading, or mining ofprimary dunes is prohibited. 2. Clean sand of a compatible type and size is the only material which may be deposited. Any deposition requires a coastal erosion management permit. , 3 It is noted that the applicant argues in its letter of November 12,2008,that since this area is not located within a beach area,that the Trustees did not have jurisdiction. While the applicant maybe correct with respect to the location of the proposed construction in relation to the location of the beach area,the applicant failed to address the Trustee's finding that the proposed construction was within a primary dune area and therefore prohibited under§111-13(Q. -11- 3. All depositions must be vegetatively stabilized using species tolerant of the conditions at the site and must be placed so as to increase the size of,or restore, a dune or dune are. 4. Active bird nesting and breeding areas must not be disturbed, unless such disturbance is pursuant to a specific wildlife management activity approved, in writing, by the Department. S. Nonmajor additions to existing structures are allowed on primary dunes pursuant to a coastal erosion management permit and subject to permit conditions concerning the location, design and potential impacts of the structure on the primary dune. 6. Stone revetments or other erosion protection structures compatible with primary dunes will only be allowed at the waterward toe of primary dunes and must not interfere with the exchange of sand between primary dunes and their fronting beaches. Section 111-13(C)further states that"[a]ll other activities and developments in dune areas are prohibited unless specifically provided for by this chapter." The construction of a new single family residence does not fall within the activities that are permitted in a primary dune area under §111-13(A). Therefore, as determined by the Board of Trustees,the proposal qualifies as"other activities and developments" and is prohibited under §11 Based on the foregoing,the Town Board affirms the determination by the Trustees. While the applicant argues that the Trustees have granted applications for Coastal Erosion Hazard Area permits to similar applications,the Trustees correctly distinguished these prior approvals in that each application involved land that was already developed and not vacant land, as is the case in this application: 1. Pearlstein was granted a CEM permit for a 432 s.f. addition to an existing single family residence, an addition to be constructed on pilings above base flood elevation. No primary dune was identified on the property. 2. Von Zuben was granted a CEM permit for a renovation of an existing single family dwelling,placement of the house on pilings, construction of a new deck,replacement of a sanitary system, removal of concrete walls on property lines, and the construction of a new gravel driveway. Construction was not proposed on an identified primary dune. 3. Rosicki was granted a CEM permit for the construction of a proposed addition and alteration to an existing family residence including a deck and sanitary system. 4. Betsch—was denied a CEM permit initially and was granted a CEM permit only after obtaining a variance from the Town Board. The CEM permit was for the construction of a new single family dwelling and garage, in place of an existing dwelling,to be built on pilings with conditions. -12- Irl f 5. Taskoff was granted a CEM permit to replace a burned out existing structure with a new single family residence with pool. No primary dune was identified where construction,was proposed. 6. Litner was required to obtain only a building permit as the additions to the existing home did not constitute a major addition under Chapter 111 7. Sonnenborn received building permits for their home in 1989, prior to the enactment of Chapter 111. Furthermore,the applicant argued and presented information to the Trustees that the property and surrounding area had not experienced erosion and that the area had experienced accretion. This information was irrelevant to the Trustees consideration under Chapter 111. In this instance,once the primary,dune area was identified,the Trustees had no authority to consider rates of erosion. The applicant could have used such information before this board to argue its entitlement to a variance and/or to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation,the entity having authority to move the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line. The applicant also notes that four alternate plans were submitted and considered by the Trustees,however, each of these plans proposed construction that was prohibited in a primary dune area under§11143(C). As such,the fact that the applicant submitted alternate plans that downsized the building is irrelevant and could not have been considered by the Trustees. For the reasons set forth above,the Town Board affirms the determination of the Trustees denying the applicant's request for a CEM permit. RELIEF FROM CHAPTER 111 A. Standard for Variance Relief. In the alternative to seeking a reversal of the Trustee's denial of a coastal erosion hazard permit,the applicant has.requested variance relief from the standards of Chapter 111 pursuant to §111-20. In permitting the Board to grant such relief,the Town has recognized that the"strict application of the standards and restrictions of this chapter may cause practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship." This section goes on to list those criteria that an applicant has the burden of establishing that this Board must consider when contemplating the grant of a variance from the strict application Chapter 111: A. No reasonable,prudent, alternative site is available. B. All responsible means and measures to mitigate adverse impacts on natural systems and their functions and values have been incorporated into the activity's design ant the property owner's expense. C. The development will be reasonably safe from floo_ d and erosion damage. -13- D. The variance requested is.the minimum necessary to overcome the practical difficulty or hardship which was the basis for the requested variance. E. Where public funds are utilized, the public benefits must clearly outweigh the long-term adverse effects. B. Location of the Primary Dune and Finding of Unnecessary Hardship Prior to proceeding with a determination as to whether or how regulated activities could be conducted on the applicant's property pursuant to §111-20,this Board determined that it would be necessary to identify and locate on the site plan the property's most landward natural protective feature and its landward limit. As noted above,the consultant reports submitted by the applicant refer to the presence of"beach ridges"or"sand ridges" on the property which were readily observed by Herrmann. Section 111-6 defines a dune as a"ridge or hill of loose,windblown or artificially placed earth,the principal component of which is sand." Additionally, §111-6 defines a "primary dune"as the most waterward major dune where there are two or more parallel dunes"or any dune"where there is only one dune present." According to Herrmann's August 25,2010 report,which is hereby adopted by the Town Board, the beach ridge identified by the 'applicant's experts qualifies as a primary dune under §111-6 and, as such, constitutes a natural protective feature. The landward regulatory limit of the primary dune occurs 25 feet landward of the landward toe of the dune identified on the property, as set forth in the definition of a"primary dune" in §111- 6. As discussed in greater detail in the above section, entitled"Appeal of the Trustees' Determination,"new construction is prohibited within a primary dune area(and,by definition,25 ft. from the landward toe of the primary dune itself) and since the proposed construction in alternatives 1-6 as presented by the applicant would have situated new structures within the primary dune area,the applicant could not meet the standards set forth in §111-9. Since the 44 to 54-foot'wide area between the road and the regulatory limit of the primary dune is arguably insufficient area to place even a minimally sized dwelling a reasonable distance from North Sea Drive,this Board concludes that the strict application of the standards and restrictions of Chapter 111 has created a practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship for the applicant. C. Analysis of Variance Criteria Pursuant to §111-20 the applicant,had the burden of establishing that he has satisfied each of the criteria listed-therein. As set forth in further detail below, the applicant can satisfy each of the criteria, if certain conditions are met: 1. No reasonable,prudent, alternative site-is available. -14- F The application generally states that there is no reasonable,prudent alternative site because the applicant does not own other property within the Town. However,this standard also requires the applicant to consider alternative locations for the proposed structure on property at issue in this appeal. According to the Herrmann report, should the Town permit the site to be developed the reasonable and prudent location for the proposed structures would be entirely landward of and as far behind the identified geologic primary dune as possible because the.dune, which was described by the applicant's consultant(Mr. Terchunian) as "typically very stable" and"dominated by mature vegetation",provides whatever natural protection a dwelling can have on this site. Alternate 6 does propose to locate the proposed structures predominately behind the "landward toe of the most landward beach ridge" as depicted on the applicant's site,plan, however,the structures would be located physically adjacent to the beach ridge and the cantilevered deck would extend directly over it. As concluded by Herrmann and the 'Town Engineer, if the integrity of the beach ridge were compromised or undermined whether during or after construction, a reasonable, prudent, alternative site that situates the proposed structures further from the landward toe of the most landward beach ridge/primary dune is available on the site. The Board finds that there is an alternative location on this property to construct a home that will adequately protect the natural protective feature. The applicant can place all structures 8 feet from the landward toe of the primary dune. 2. All responsible means and measures to mitigate adverse impacts on natural systems and their functions and values have been incorporated into the activity's design at the property owners' expense. The applicant argues that Alternate 6,which proposes a house on pilings and a cantilevered deck, adequately mitigates potential adverse impacts within the primary dune area. As noted in the Herrmann report,placing the house on pilings is a requirement of FEMA,the federal regulatory program that protects the proposed structure from potential flood and erosion damage and has nothing to do with the protection of or mitigating impacts to the primary dune area identified on the plan. The July 15, 2010 application(Alternative 6)did not include a discussion of environmental impacts, including potential for causing increased erosion at the site and at adjacent locations; potential impacts on natural protective features and their function and value; and potential impacts on natural resources. In this instance, the most significant need for mitigation is that required to physically protect and preserve the primary dune by preventing its physical displacement or degradation both during and after construction(Herrmann report p. 3). While the applicant agreed to place a project limiting fence at the landward toe of the primary dune, a fence could not be maintained at that location during construction of the current proposal because the swimming pool, deck and southwest portion of the dwelling are proposed physically adjacent to and/or over the dune and,the excavation for and the installation of those structures and their foundations would necessitate workers, equipment and machinery accessing the seaward side during construction(Herrmann -15= 1 report page 4). This would ultimately breach the proposed clearing limitation line and would disturb the primary dune. Additionally, after construction there may be loss of vegetation that could result from direct shading by the cantilevered deck that would extend directly over the primary dune (Id.). The Applicant has submitted a letter written by Michael Burner,President of Elderco,-Inc., concluding that the proposed construction could be accomplished without damaging the dune and stating that no machinery will be required in the dune area south of the proposed fencing on the landward toe of the dune. However,the Town Engineer, despite review of the statements made in the Elderco,-Inc. letter, has reiterated the recommendation of Herrmann that the construction and cantilevered deck and pool be set back a minimum of 8' to 10' from the landward toe of the dune to adequately protect the integrity of the dune to provide a minimal buffer area around new construction and provide access to the new construction without the need for encroachment into the dune area. Further,the Town Engineer has opined that the cantilevered style of framing will create the need to access the end of deck framing. This Board also notes that the Applicant has not submitted any engineering plans to document and illustrate that the general statements made in the Elderco, Inc. letter are possible on this particular site. As such,the Board agrees with both Herrmann and the- Town Engineer that the shading of the dune area will negatively affect the health of the dune system and that the construction process will ultimately reach out and negatively affect the dune area. The Herrmann report also identifies potential impacts on natural resources that include,but are not limited to the permanent removal of certain areas of natural vegetation; increase in runoff due to displacement of pervious sand soils with structures and impervious surfaces and the potential for introduction of fertilizers and other contaminants. To deal with these potential impacts the Town will require, and the applicant has agreed to take the following measures: L Erect a project-limiting fence and staked hay bales along the proposed limit of clearing, grading, and ground disturbance prior to the commencement of construction and maintained until the completion. , ii. The undisturbed portion of the site shall be maintained as nondisturbance buffer. iii. All cleared areas that are not built upon must be restored with native; nonfertilizer-dependent vegetation and maintained as a landscape buffer iv.No pesticides,fertilizers or similar chemicals shall be permitted on site. The Board finds that the-above conditions and further a condition that all structures and construction take place a minimum of 8 feet from the landward toe of the primary dune will adequately mitigate potential adverse impacts on natural systems and their functions and values, in accordance with the recommendation of Herrmann and the Town Engineer. 3. The development will be reasonably safe from flood and erosion damage. -16- The appeal presented by the applicant relies primarily upon technical reports that document the relative stability of the adjacent shoreline for the past 40 years. However, a period of stability along a given shoreline does not necessarily indicate that the shoreline will remain stable, and regardless of its historical,trends, any shoreline fronting Long Island Sound is potentially susceptible to flood and erosion damage during significant individual storm events.4 To make this proposal as reasonably safe from,flood and erosion damage as is possible on a property adjacent to the Sound it should be constructed on pilings,which the applicant has committed to, and by placing it as far from the sound and a minimum of 8 feet away from the most landward toe of the primary dune is practicable and will adequately protect the integrity of the primary dune to further protect the structure from flood and erosion damage. Alternative 6 proposes to construct a single family dwelling, deck,and pool physically adjacent to and over the primary dune, which creates the potential for the degradation of the feature and undermines the feature's ability to provide protection for the development and adjacent areas against flooding and erosion. 4. The variance requested is the minimum necessary to overcome the practical difficulty or hardship which was the basis for the requested variance. The applicant also argues that the single family dwelling proposed in Alternatives 1-5 were relocated and reduced in size in-the single family dwelling proposed in Alternative 6, but does not specifically address whether or how the minimum variance relief necessary to overcome the applicant's.hardship. Alternative 6 proposes structures physically adjacent to the primary dune, in part to a stated desire to maintain the 40-ft. front yard setback required by the Zoning Code. The development could be shifted farther landward of the primary dune and without requiring a variance by downsizing and/or reconfiguration of the proposed structures. The approximately 1,700 sq. ft. footprint of the proposed two story dwelling is nearly twice the 850 sq. ft.minimum required by Chapter 280,and the swimming pool and deck are proposed on the seaward side of the dwelling. Given the need to balance zoning and environmental restrictions,placing the dwelling closer to the road and/or reducing the scope of the structures,the development proposed by Alternate 6 is more than the minimum relief necessary to overcome the hardship that is the basis of this appeal and the applicant has not provided any evidence or proof to the contrary. However, if the applicant moved all structures beyond a minimum of,8 feet of the landward toe of the primary dune,this Board believes that the applicant can construct a single-family dwelling and that this is the minimum variance necessary to overcome the practical difficulty or hardship of the applicant. 4 The applicant has emphasized that this area has not had significant erosion and has actually accreted through this proceeding to support the argument that it is entitled to coastal erosion permit. This Board notes that it is not the authority that draws the coastal erosion hazard line and has no jurisdiction to do so. Chapter 1 l I refers to the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Map of the Town of Southold prepared by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. While this Board may sympathize with the applicant regarding the stability of this coastline and the lack of erosion over the past 40 years,it cannot remove this parcel from the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area and must apply Chapter 111,as written. -17- 5. Where public funds are utilized, this criteria does not apply in this instance as there are no public funds being utilized. CONCLUSION Therefore, in the interests of justice and for the reasons set forth herein,this Board grants the applicant relief from Chapter 111 of the Town Code upon the following conditions: 1. All structures and construction occur a minimum of 8 feet from the landward toe of the primary dune depicted on the site-plan prepared by Young&Young dated September 21, 2010. 2.- The erection of a project limiting fence and staked hay bales along the limits of clearing, grading and ground disturbance prior to the commencement of construction and maintained until completion of construction. 3. The undisturbed portion of the site shall be maintained as a nondisturbance buffer. 4. All cleared areas not built upon must be restored with native,nonfertilizer- dependent vegetation and maintained as a landscape buffer. 5. No pesticides,fertilizers, or similar chemicals shall be permitted on site. 6. The installation of leaders, gutters, and drywells to control runoff from the proposed structures. The granting of this relief is subject to the conditions of such other permits as the applicant has already acquired or may otherwise have to acquire f6r final approval of the proposed project. Furthermore,this Board finds that the proposal is classified as an Unlisted Action pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations, 6 NYCRR, Section 617, and that the Board, as Lead Agency, issues a Negative Declaration for the proposal,with the above conditions. Finally,this Board finds that this project is consistent with the LWRP pursuant to Chapter 268 of the Town Code, Waterfront Consistency Review, so long as the above conditions are adhered to. Dated: January 4, 2011 -18- NOTES Young & Young a < AREA = 24,819 5Q. FT. 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 el.. • VERTI6AL DATUM=N.A.V.DATUM(1988) 631-727-2303 i SEE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE PANEL NUMBER Howard W. Young, Land Sumeyor e �Qi 5610360154 H LAST DATED SEPT.25,2009 Thomas C. WoLpert, Professional Engineer �v 4L Dougias E. Adams. o,(gProfessional Engineer -q �' •lg4.p �1d' o ZONING USE DISTRICT 'R-40' Robert C. Tact, Architect OVO o HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE $ 5 . \� ��n ,' Eel. ci i' ®Rl' -0, ,./ % - S�o ^�� �$ d✓ �� d, , ebb r / 'h N� .j moi. r ¢�� 0% 5URVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION 4°j ,Lr �%,�!'9� i� /•/ v �� ye HEREBY CERTIFY TO RGBERT G. B0MBA THAT �g J' \ THIS SURVEY AAS PREPARED IN AGGORDANC E ,¢ ..i�'� •%'E � y i a� / OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYS ADOPTE +^ YORK STATE ASSOCIATION OF PROFE551 1VI.rOj13 o 1• /oo A nq�4 / SURVEYORS. co/•kv:' �. \ ,% ; _ ' > .4„ , �,=�r:•[=ems 0 ;3 s� O tilt 3 o i _ _ C �(� L4hD ' `0 / s9• 1�ot 0 s o ��. /'�ro HOWARD W.YOUN6,N.Y.S.L.S.NO.45H95 ' bj R R 46ry9 44 /'/� SURVEY FORa Ar o cfry )?.IV S.' r �agr ® 3 `� �tr'Fg /;/i� BER tl G. I�IBARA At Southold, Town of Southold A /Al Suffolk County, New York County Tax Mop ot.Irlct 1000 S.ct[Ou 54 Block 04 Lot 19 11e FINAL.SURVEY SANITARY MEASUREMENTS / @� �R A B 9 ar.' o M 9 5T 115' 65' AO g/ z DF2 21' 54' s<gg r DPB 24' 47' I AMENDED SANITARY MEASUREMENTS APR 15,2016 JUL 2 2 2016 MAP PREPARED_ FEB.221 2016 g��a SCALE,I°=40' ' p.Hmu.49,r stT ®•Mo,uaur room Q.sv.,x ser ®.sn,re roues JOB NO.2014-0016 1 OF I �� o r sa•Resor oven s saes ,�, �„�„� BUMDING DEM DWS.2006-0182-2014_0096-fe I I „ NOTES Young & Young ! N AREA = 24,8-1'1 SQ.FT. 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 • VERTICAL DATI UM=NA.V.DATUM-(1888) 631-727-2303 • SEE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE PANEL NUMBER Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor b �I 9610360154 H LAST DATED SEPT.25,200q Thomas C. Wotpert, Professional Engineer ' - 2.W J,A g\ Douglas E. Adams, Professional Engineer 4 /��• arott4 9\ol0 • AMOUNT OF FI4L REGZUIRED=BOO G.Y.t '� f g at W � Ov • FILL TO BE GLEAN'BANK-RUN SAND AND GRAVEL Robert C. Tast, Architect "fit . ,�• E �, V) ,��!// QQ Q7' •�gp.�a FROM AN APPROVED UPLAND SITE. ° /i/cf `��g,�y • BUILDING FOOTPRINT FIRST FLOOR AREA- 1,1.18 50.FT. {d' I SECOND FLOOR AREA= 1,954 So.FT. HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE �j i IN ,((/ 302 !1f�/ • • ZONING USE DISTRICT= 'R-4o' �� CT� ` 1 �`� / yK % • THE UNDISTURBED PORTION OF THE 517E SHALL BE / �Br g ^561 MAINTAINED AS A'NON0I5TURBANCE BUFFER �68FFOL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES p�J 4Jry/ice/f / I' �t g `moi`' {� /i�. / / / d / 7 sa �d 7 6zPERMITFOR/ePPR01/A6 OF CONSTRUCTION FORg �� / /� / / 5sg. �� �f / / L�:82 a��xa SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCEONLy N- 4) .10 \ H.S. / / / / Ql @ + \° / / / / Sas / / 7 / '� 2 F Q' './y BOl 2(r'ry�.�5 �aPPRA E �Q,g�'0 ,t. / / /7 !P ` X9.6�E� /�'~/ O,C'fP` FOR SEDROOMS 0 �!� - d!`1•'Og\ !�/ / / / %°/ / 0 / /9 6,1 _934-� / /ij�j �T `�QJ d' IUM OF �// EXPIRES THREE YEARS F MDATEOF Q? �9 307 \b1/ / / / / / / / �f -s°' `.� ).ss J —_ _ ��/ f � i �?i { / SURVEYOR'S GERTIF / b9 �b�B.O 114• 544) / U ` O TEST HOLE �y / YS¢f° T(�v� % \ JQQQ t� / / / �' ( h 539' S5� d •750 BY m.PoNALD GE05C-104W ' / `5 / , I? DATE,o5A[lob `6 10 /� �' N `� / ,I 5 71 / 7 27 yy // / HOWARD W YOUNG,NY ,LS..lV� 45899 ffi EL.6.49' /bc>' —p.5o o y iq�i / ti• / / / /iT/ P �C01 �dy PALE OWM .7.2( (/6 62 1 t+ T\` I / f 5 '` 7 2 I / FINE �x 1 S36 e�7 / 6' •TN s.a9 ' // / / // SURVEY FOR (5Y1� `� I ./ , ; , . .y/ /, �o ROBERT 6. BOMBARA s R 1 ?, 5 �4K� 1`_?;/ //j At Southold, Town of Southold 1X1 4'B' a��6° % /s.a // j/y Suffolk County,Naw York o 4 K&TERIN �g Ly�o 7zsii/ s \ „ m3 S ) , County Tax Map DIOrld IOOOs.e— 54 ete=k 04 Lot IR PALE TO yg, g SV A /�e 6 71- s a / /��✓/"�� ; r�°�, BUILDIN& PERMIT SURVEY- ALTERNATE -1 awAR.SM t� � cy / h / _ SAND �A •`"� 9 �o,� /°�/ \z.o7\sS- �E0 99 Ila Yet b S! N� oC/e^/ \ AM 25,2013 �' //// s se�Q� AMENDED BUILD NG PERED 5017HS IMIT DATA APR.OI,2015 r. e O 4 ey �`. �aI 44� ADDED NONDISTURBANCE BUFFER NOTE AUS.25,2012 9 as S `� , / 7*7� /��^ `\ tb1t3 AMENDED BUAMENDED ILDING PERMIT DATA MAR.NGS PERMIT 12ATAI10 201111 Y1 7 �/ �� �� �� AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA FEB.08,2011 6€91 //i ®`\� AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA FEB.01,2011 €1$ PERCENT ADJACENT AREA COVERAGE , /% / // ��� � �� AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA SEPT.90,2010 aR1g PROPOS AO S@ a~/ / // \��y� � r AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA SEPT.21,2010 P �// / D�D NYSDEG AMENDMENTS AUG.16,2010 ° g FRAME HOUSE = 1,354 50.FT. -5.4% �1j / / I 4+`\� 'N '-�y�j 9-'DHS AMENDMENTS NOV.25,2009 DECK = 128 SO.FT. =05% NIP 56 56 / �Q° n° AMENDED BI BUILDING PERMIT DATA NOV.24,2009 8nb] POOL = 251 50 FT. - 1.0% 2 7 31 AMENDED BUILDING PERM DATA OCT.30,2009 I A B 00 AMENDED BUILDING PERMIT DATA SEPT.14,200-1 Alm TOTAL=I,-i33 SQ.FT. =6.9% MAP PREPARED AUG.1?,200'1 7 Ea LIN Ra, E].140K# Sur Q•M NLV W FOND Q.0 5rA1 SET •STArL FOND / I 9 SOB N 1200' b6 ♦ I JOB NO.2006-0920 I OF 2 ITDWG.2006-0162-by-bomM I l