Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout600 u foto FDO s7+ 'I�, HOWA3��------ -- S-ept` 5 1963 -- NI - - ,._ attituc�-.-Nevt mark -- -- - --- -- - _ p-u�dTFp �,erm, Ga�-an_t9 :exeat accessory_ on SE3S9uth=-_ ., _in front yard area—g-£ pranert—, Dr �e_s?_nd—Ba�'�iew__��Leue< Ka�ituck New f , TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD 'OF APPEALS DATE S9P..ten!ber 5, 1963 Appeal No. 600 Dated August 8, 1963 ACTION ON T,*-' ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO Howard L. Wells Appellant South Drive Mattituck, New York at a meeting of the Zoning Board sof Appeals on Thurs. , September 5, 1963 the appeal was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your 1 Request for variance due to lack of access to property ( ) Request for a specialexception under the Zoning Ordinance RequesC for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance t. SPEWAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a special exception ( ) be granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article .............................. Section ............................. Subsection ............................. paragraph ............................ of the Zoning Ordinance, and the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) be confirmed because 9: 00 P.M. (E.D. S.T. ) , upon applicationof Howard L. Wells, South . Drive, Mattituck, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 7, for permission to erect an accessory building in the front yard area. Location of property: Lot G on map of Shore Acres, southeast side of south Drive and Bayview Avenue, Mattituck, New York, bounded north by Bayview Avenue, south by Mabel H. Duryee, Lot F. , east by Mattituck Creek, and west by South Drive. Z. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would)(would not) produce practical difficulties or unnec- essary hardship because see REVERSE (p) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because SE:E REVERSE (c) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) (would not) change the character sof the district because SEE REVERSE and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( ) be denied and that the previous decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed. A E }�LD ZONIN BO OF APPEALS FORM ZB4 _ Judith T. Boken, Secretary (continued from front) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the plot of the applicant is approximately 541 feet in length on the southerly line and approximately 370 feet on the northerly line bordering Bayview Avenue. This plot runs from South Road on the west and is bounded by Mattituck Creek on the east. The appli- cant has a general contracting business consisting of excavating, grading, earth moving and road building.- His customers are largely individual property owners, developers and builders. Mr. Wells has been in business for a period in excess of 10 years. At the time the Zoning Ordinance became effective, April 1957, the operations of Mr. Wells were noted as non-conforming use in an "A" Residential and Agricultural District. The operation is exclusively a one man project. There are no employees at present. The demand for this type of work has increased over the years, Mr. Wells starting with two pieces of equipment is now the owner of six pieces of equipment, including a crawler tractor, with bucket loader, bulldozer, road grader, truck, tractor and trailer, and pick-up, all of which he uses at various times in various places. The area of his property extending along Bayview Avenue is one of the few level spots on the property and has been used for open storage for some or all of this equipment in the past. Mr. Wells proposed to construct a garage 30 ft. by 40 ft. a minimum of 40 ft. back from Bayview Avenue and in the event that the area was insufficient for the construction, he proposed to excavate the necessary additional space in, a steep bank which extends in a generally parallel direction along Bayview Avenue. It was determined at the hearing that he is the owner of an out building which is reached from South Road but which is in disrepair and virtually valueless. This building has a dimension of approximately 24 ft. by 12 ft. In order to grant Mr. Wells a special exception to construct this type of garage for storage of some or all of his equipment it would necessary to permit the construction of a new building to facilitate the operation of a non-conforming business. This would not be an expansion of a presently existing non-conforming building. It was the opinion of the majority of the Board that there is no provision in the Ordinance thatwould enable the Board to grant permission for such a structure. it was also the findings of the majority of the Board that the creation of such a facility would tend to prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties, that the use would inhibit the reasonable use of adjoining properties for residential purposes, that this use would not be in harmony with and promote the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance. In addition, the Board of Appeals also gave consideration to the conservation of property values in this area and the character and probable future development of properties in this area. In short, the majority of the Board felt that the proposed facility would definitely downgrade property values and discourage residential development. (see attached sheet) 7 Sheet 2 Howard L. Wells, Appeal No. 600 In dissenting from the opinion of the majority, Mr. Grigonis` and Mr. Bergen stated that they were basically in disagreement with the reasoning given by the majority and felt that it would be better to house the machinery of the applicant in the proposed structure rather than leave it uncovered along the public highway. The Board considered favorably a suggestion by a neighboring property owner to locate this facility in the southwesterly corner of the property on high ground, preferably not visible fro m Bayview Avenue and to be approached from South Road, however the applicant stated that he is unable to arrange access to such a location because of the extremely rugged terrain. In denying the current application the denial is without prejudice to a future application in such a location, should the applicant elected to make a new application. On motion of Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Gillispie, it was RESOLVED that Howard L. Wells be denied permission to erect an accessory building in the front yard area of his property located on the southeast side of South Drive and Bayview Avenue, Mattituck, New York. vote of the Board: Ayes: - Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Hulse, and Mr. Doyen. Nays: Mr. Grigonis and Mr. Bergen. t 3 .�/ /� L2Gl�� � �.�/� ���"`� Why, east by Samuel Grimson,I Lot 15, smeth ,by Cedar Beach', Har. , and west by Francis W.j Campbell, Lot 163. 8:30 P.M. (E.D.S.T.), upon •ap-I Plication of Yzrmicotte, Inc., -Bay-' view Road, Southold, New York,I, LVGAL 19MCE for p special exception in accord-Ii !Notice of )6Miring anc( 6th the Zoning Ordinance,l 1 Pursuant to Section 267 of the Article-TE, Section NO, Subsmtionl 1 'sown Law and the provisions of if, for permission to erect an&' the Amended Building Zone Or- maintain a directional sign fort dinance of the Town of Southold <,The. Heritage." Location of sign: Suffolk County, New York, public on the property of Antone Sure- 1 hearings will be held by the Zen- zenW, south side Route 25, South-I } as, tug Board of Appeals of the Town old, New York, bounded north by, 1 04 Southold at the Town Office, Main Road, east, south and west), Main Road, Southold, New York, by Michael Suramnski. -4- �,,_-c_�. being duly Sworn, on August 22, 1963, an the ,follow- 8:40 P.M. (E,D.S'.T.), upon ap-I ing: appeals: plication' of Yennieotte, Inc., Bay-i Tinter and Publisher of the SUF'F'OLK 7:30 P.M. (E.DS.TJ, upon ap- view Road, Southold, New York,' plication of Gene E. Kleinsmith, for a special exception in accord-dished at Greenport, in said county; Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel, ance with the Zoning Ordinance, New York, for a special exception Article III, Section aoo, SubsMtion1rhich the annexed is a printed copy, in accordance with the Zoning 11, for permission to erect and;, Ordinance, Article III, Section maintain a directional sign for)a said Suffolk Times once in each 306, for' permission to erect a ^The Heritage." Location of sign:i, j dwelling with a reduced front yard on the pr�rtY 08 Leffeats P. i- C Gw .._.. __. week$ j .setback of 6 ft. on a private Edson, easterly side of Bayview right-of:way.- Location of prop- Road, Southold, New York, bound-16 the .... er y: S % of lot 4 ,and N 1/a of lot ed north �b Jacob's Lane, east 'l ent y 'I' 19 C 5 on mapu of Elizabeth Mesroblan, south and west by Bayview Road a private road on the south 9:00 P.M. (ED.S'.T:), upon ap- «1 'S .� �'\firs ..._.... on side of Peoonic Bay Boulevard, plication of Howard L. Wells I - ..._. Laurel, New York, bounded north South Drive, Mattituck, New York i�by T. Flesehutz east by Brush's for a variance in accordance with Creek, south- by E: G. Best, and the Zoning Ordinafiace; A'rticic Mesrobian III, Section 300, Subsection 7, for west by private road ( erect an accesso ermission to ry, .. _ 'Drive). p - __ _ .5P. , (William E. Golder bolding the front yard areal plication po p Location S property: Lot G on; .�J map of Shore Acres; southeast, - a/c Southold Pharmacy, Main side of South Drive sand- Bayview" Street, Southold, New York, for a Avenue, Mattituck� New York,l special exception in acordance bounded north by Bayview.Avenue, with, .the Zoning '(7rdinance, Arti- ' K :O(,H cle IV, 'Section 408, SWmetion (b) south by Mabe H. Duryec, Lot F,. ivV,q,Y Pt , .and west by South Drive: ntc of New YOM1, for permssion to erect and (� c ,..890 maintain a wall sign. containing Any person desiring io be heardshould p,alc , , �oik County in excess of the maximam square appear the above applications should s0. 196! — footage permitted. Location of appear ec the time and' plisse property: north sides MairL Street, above specified. Southold, New York, bounded 'DATED: August S, 1963, BY Or- dernorbh -by John Bucci, east bgJ. of the Southold Town Krupski - Johnson, south by Main Board of Appeals itiAh16 Street, and west by K:. PYlka. 8:00 P.M. (ED.S.T:7s. upon ap- plication of John R. and Jean P. Edler, Cleaves Point Road, Eastl Marion, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 7, for permission to maintain an accessory building in the side yard area. Location) of property: Lot No. 4" on snap of Marion Manor, south side Cleaves i Point Road, East Marian, New York, bounded north by Cleaves Point Road, east by Martin MeY- er, Lot 3, south by Gardiners Bay, and westby Peter Blank, Lot 5. 8:15 P.M. (E.D.S.TJ, upon ap- plication sof Michael Razzano, Sunset Way, Southold, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III,I Section 300, Subsection 7, for per-11 mission to erect an accessoryi building in the front yard area. Location of property: south side sunset Way, Southold; New York, Lot No. 164 on map of Cedar Beach Park, bounded north by Sunset Mortice of gearing Pursuant to section 3169 Of the Town Lace and the provisions Of the Asendad suilding cons Ordinance of the Town Of 8oathOld, Suffolk County. now Yo*, public hearings will be held by the Soning aroard of Appeals Of the Town Of Southold, at the Town Office, rima hood, Southold, Now Yoad[, Oa August 21, 1963, an the falewiaq appealsa 7r3O P.M. (Z.D.S.T. ), Vp= application of 0ene i. Klttasaith. Peconic Say abeulevard, Laaral, NOW York, for a special suMptiOn I In accordance with the toning Ordinance, Article 111. section 306" for pesattssioa to *seat a dwelling with a reduced front Of 6 ft. yard aetiaetk/ein a Private ria,�st-Of-way. Location of perOpesty3 9 3/4 of lot 4 and X 1/4 of lot Sean nalr of Elisabeth MOVOblan, I on a private read on the south side of Peconic Day bculov"Ao I Laassl, stew York. bown4edasrth by T. Fleschuts, east by a3ru6h's Croak* south by 1. G. west, and wont by private road (Mesrobia:► ij Drive. ) 7*50 P.K. (as.D.S.T. ), upon application of siilliaa R. GOlderl i a/c Southold lharnscy, slain Street, Southold, Mw York, for a special onceptioa in accordance with the roainq OrdinaenCe, a Article iv, Section 406, Subsection (b) 1, for Pers<isSIOD to i orect and natetain a wall st.1a containing its *=*so of the aaleitiswm square foutAgo permitted. Location Of property, north side ronin street, Southold, Mw York, bounded worth by John Succi, east by J. Krupoki - Johnson, south by gain Street, and wast by K. Pylko. Page 2 - Legal notice S: O P.M. Upon applieatian of John R. and Jisaa P. Rdler, Cleaves Point Road, last Marlon, New York, for e wariencs in SCOCCONACe with the $aainQ Ordinance, Article 111, Section 300, subsection 9, for permission to maintain an accessory building in the aids yard area. Location of wopsrtys Lot Me. d an map of Marine Mews, mouth side Cl+eavos Point Road, toot xa rioa� ii crew York* bounded earth by Cleaves Point Read, seat by Martin **yet, Lot 3, south by Gardiners say, and west by Pets Blank, Lot s, S s 13 P.M. (R.D.S.T. ) , upon ay+plisatioa of Michael Rossano. S*aet 'ways Southold, New Yorks for a variance in accordance with � the As"" ordinanas• Article T11. section 300, subsection 7, for pernissias to erect an accessory building in the grant yard areas i Location of propertys south side Summist way. Southold, now York, i �i Lost Xo. 164 aro gaup of Corder search Parlt, bounded north by 3unsst i� C ways east by Saarssl Grissom, Lot 1"s mouth by Cedar Beach xarbor� i and sorest by Trawls W. Cavell, Lot 163. ii 800 P.M. (B.D.S.T. ) . QVCa app+licat Oft of YsrMnieotte, Inc., sayview Road, Southold, now Yorks for a special exception In acewdan+ce with the zoning ordinance, Article ill. Section 3000 ' subsection 11, for permission to erect and maintain a directional C; }! sign for •Tbe merits". " utication of signs an this property of Antans surowaskio south side Routs 23, Southold, xow Yofts boun4d south Bad art north by gain Road, "at/by Kithat aurawaski, i 6 s 40 P.M. (R.D.S.T. ) , Upon application of Ymmmoloottae, xnc, , { Bapvisw Road, Southold, 'Mew York, far a special exception in ?I ' e! accordance with the ming Ardinaencrs, llstSclis 11Y. !awtlou 300. :ubseetiaa 11, far permission to erect and maintain a directionsl sign fon' "Rise Reritags. a Location of signs on the property of 1 '1 ! page 3 - Legal Notice Lefferts P. Edson. easterly side of Bayview Road, outheold, Sow York. bounded north by Jacaib`s Lino, easts sea" and retest by BayV"w Rea& 91 O4 P.M. upon application of leeward L. lls, south Drive, elattituck, vow York, for a vartance in accordance rine the y1smi g ordlaamcs, article 111, section 300, subseatum 7, feos permission to arect an aessssory building in the front r hard area. lootatian Of pearspertye Lot a can map of Sho" Acres, Southeast side of south Drive and sayview Avenue. Mattituck, Now I Ymar)c, bounded north by Bayview Avon**, south by Mabal H. Duryee. Lot r, and Vogt by +nth Drive. Any person desiring to be hoard on the above applications i Should appear at the time and place above Specified. DAUDI August 6, 1963. By 0rdor of the Southold Town Board of Appeals. # # # PU" PUBLISR OWE, AUMAT 16, 1963. .UV PMWARD EIGHT (8) A"IDAVITS OF KULICATION TD TIN ROAAD GY APPRMA, 80tn'HOLD, N.Y. Copies mailed to the following an August 9, 19631 The Suffolk TIM" The Lent' Island Traveler-IMattituek Watchman shame Z. uleineeaith William B. Golder. a/c Southold pharmacy Jobe R. and Jean P. Rdlor alledeael Ransom stteaaaica3ette, lac. noward L. wells SQWAM •noF7tit Arno Al To MLNUQ i S TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK �L APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR APPEAL NO. � DATE ... .......... TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N—.p/Y. / 1, (We) ...2�...R .. ; ......................of .............4-1:2`.:.. ................................ Name of Appellant Street and Number ....... .. ..... , ................................................... ......�:..� HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality Stdte THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILD /IPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO. .................................... DATED ....... ...... .r` WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO c ...� W.... ........................... Name of Applicant for permit of .,Q. 7//. R....................... .0& r.:.......... ....:.. Street and Number Municipality State ( ) PERMIT TO USE ( ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY d � , 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY ....................... .:- u ? . ./L� . .. ' ... ........e4...0!^'!' .. Street UsU e p�tr ct on Zoning Map t Q Map No. Lot No. 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph the Zoning 0d once by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) 6 � � . 3 �d 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for ( ) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (40m) (has not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such Gppeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No. ................................Dated ...................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 (X) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested for the reason that Form zsi (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEAL Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because j A,-- �� /�p `J 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because ✓`�"'- ' "t/1 0- 3. 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because STATE OF NEW YORK ) .20 GIJ� l{ ) ss . .....................9........................................... COUNTY OFJ"',"_/ ) Signature Sworn to this ..................1.......................... day of............. ;�G........................ 10 Y .............. ...�...... ................ Notary AUPEAI'iJ i ' BARBARA IC. Notary Public in the State¢t New}w, No. 52-5569890 Redding in Suffolk�o��r-ty Commission Fxpires M'&Tch FORK NO.I TOWN OF SOMOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERKTOFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. Examined .............................. ........ 19........ Application No. ............................ Approved ......................................... 19........Permit No. ................................ Disapproveda/c ............................................................................................ ............................................................................................I............................ ................................................................................................. (Building Inspector) APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Agg�;p ............ Date ............................ ....... 196 INSTRUCTIONS a. This application must be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted in duplicate to the Building Inspector. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and giving a detailed description of layout of property must be drawn on the diagram which is part of this appfication. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the progress of the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose whatever until a Certificate of Occupancy shall have been granted by the Building Inspector. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Otclinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions or alterations, or for removal or demolition, as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. Howard Wells ......................................................................................I.......... (Signature of applicant, or name, if a corporation) ..........South...Dr,l.....Ma tt.i.tu.c.k....................................... (Address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder. owner — bu.i..-..der................................. ....................................................................................... ........................................................ . Nameof owner of premises ...HQWBX.d...kel-�.a.................................................................................................................... If applicant is a corporate, signature of duly authorized officer. .................... (Name Name..and .title..of..corporate. .. affice0 G 1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done. Map No. ......Shore AerS.......................e.............. Lot No: ,Plot................. Street and Number Mattituokt N.Y...................................................... Municipality 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy ........ ............I...................................................... with garage, built into bank b. Intended use and occupancy ........Same............................................................................................................... F 3. Nature of work (check whicn applicable): New Building .XXX......... Addition .................. Alteration .................. Repair .................... Removal .................... Demolition.................... Other Work (Describe) ........................ 4. Estimated Cost ..........32500 P/M.................. Fee ...................................................... (to be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units ..............`............:...Number of dwelling units on each floor ............................ Ifgarage, number of cars ............................. ............................................................................................................... 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature.and extent of each type of use ................................ 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front.......................... Rear .......................... Depth .............................. Height ............................ Number of Stories ............................................. ............................................................... Dimensions of some structure with alterations or additions: Front ................................ Rear ................................ Depth ............................ Height ................................Number of Stories ........................................ 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front.............1#Q.............. Rear ......11:Q................. Depth .... Q.................... Height ............................ Number of Stories....one....................... 9. Size of lot: Front ................................ Rear ............................ Depth ........................................ 10. Date of Purchase ........................................................Name of Former Owner ........................................................ 17. Zone or use district in which premises are situated........11 ll.Alpt............................................................ .......... 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? .....YP.$......................................... 13. Name of Owner of premises ...H....Walls.................Address ........Mattituck.............. Phone No. .................... Name of Architect ......... .......................................Address ............................................ Phone No. .................... Name of Contractor .....................it............................. Address ............................................ Phone No. .................... PLOT DIAGRAM tticate clearly and distinctly all buildings, whether existing or proposed, and indicate all set-back dimensions from property lines. Give street and block numbers or description according to deed, and show street names and indicate whether interior or corner lot. ullo 5r1 a t4 V PAY viff� A Vr_' STATE COUNTY OF OF ..........NEjj�9.t X...........) S.S. ................. .. .......Hoyar.d...we.1.1.s........................................being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the applicant (Nome of f...individual. . ....signing. . . application) above named. He is the ..................PXAoPr_..7:...b wk 1A P r................................................................................................... (Contractor, agent, corporate officer, etc.) of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to Perform or have' performed the said work and to make and file this application; that all statements contained ijUDiyAisr aWhcation are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be Performed in thets"ftm, 8 Wifl*Mw illonthe application filed therewith. Sworn to befQW me this ft. 52.0344963, Suffolk County Y/ %winion ire; rc 30, 19&5— ..............40 ..... day of ...................... ...... ... 19..n I ........... .......... .... ........................................................... Notary Public, .......�4�-. t (Signature of applicant) te \,j N-v at l5D t' I , L, Wc- L-,--S �,.� FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CL'ERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD. N. Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL File No. . ......... .... ... .._....................... Date .. ..... ......... ..August.....$................ 19..63. To .....Howard Wells ........I . . ......I................... ......... . ..BaY_.View- Ave..J&. 8011th RO-ad...... ........ .... Mattituck ........ .. .... .. .... ....._ ....... PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated ..............AugAot. ,I............ 19..P3. for permit to construct .garage... ........ ........... at the premises located at .......DAY...VAIPY..AYe ..................... ..............................I............... Street Mattituek Shore Acres Map .. ...... .................... ... ....... .Block ....... ....... ......... ......... .._ Lot Q ....._._. ......... ... .... ............... is disapproved on the following ground.. ........... ......... ... .... ........................ .Garages...must..be.. tocat.ed..in..rear..Yard-area.... _............ . ... .... _..... ....... ............... .....Art..lilt...Section 300...sub. .7........ ......... . .__....._. . .. .........._ ........ ........ ---............ .... ........................................... ..... ............... ..................... .......... ............... ............... .......... ... ............ ............... ..... .ram ..1..,.,/'.. Building Inspector dk-n-t.c. �Cyclo�- ?,0- 25a,el- 12 1/ r r, /�/���� �� ?%�� �y� �--- � --� c j --�.��.� `= f.� ��'`� � . Mill Road, Shore Acres, Mattituck, N.Y. August 20, 1963. Town of Southold, Zoning Board of Appeals, Town Glerk's Building, Southold, New York. Gentlemen: An application is scheduled to come before your body on August 22, made by Howard Wells, for permission to construct an "accessory building" in the "front ,yard" of his property at Shore Acres, Mattituck. The "front yard" of the Wells property faces Bay View Avenue, a purely residential street. In fact, Shore Acres itself is strictly a residential area and it has been kept that way for many, many years by all the folks who own property here. It is recognized that iz . Wells, even prior to adoption of the zoning ordinance kept some machinery in his back yard but out of sight of his neighbors. The present application will now bring the machinery right out into the middle of things unless the "accessory building" is so placed and so designed that it will fit into the pattern of a residence area. It would seem pretty hard lines for his neighbors if because no one complained of the machinery storage prior to zoning that by reason thereof, Mr. Wells has acquired a right to erect a building which undoubtedly could depreciate to a serious extent the property of these same neighbors. We urge your body to give thought to the type of the building, its uses and its conformity generally to the residential aspect of the locality. our property faces partly on Bay View Avenue and at one point is only about 300 feet from the dells holdings. Very truly yours, j . I " .� . *