HomeMy WebLinkAbout574Village Lane July 12, 1962
Orient, New York
Page 4
GRANTED permission to expand existing private
labor ca~p, E/S Platt Road, Orient, New York.
TABOR~ ~[~RT,T, ~
Village Lane
Orient, New York
%53_4__
June 6,
Page 4
1963
GRANTED permission to renew labor camp permit
on E/S Platt Road, Orient, New York.
Platt Road
Orient, New York
#655 ~
April 30, 19~4~
Page 3
G~T,F.~) P~r~i~sion ~0 renew farm labor cam~
ppr~.~t granted June 6, 1963. E/S P%att ~oad,
_.Orient, New York.
LEC~AL NOTICE
~otiee of
Pu~suan~ to S~c~lon 26~
T~ ~w ~d the prov~io~ of
~ ~ded Buil~ ~ne Or-
B~an~ of the To~ of ~u~hold,
Suffo~ Co~ty, New York, ~blic
h~n~ ~ be held ~ ~e Zon-
ing ~rd of Ap~ of ~ Town
of S~hold at the Town Office,}
~n ~d, ~u~old, New York,{
en Ju~ 6, 1~3, on the following{
ap~s:
~ 30 P~. (E.D~.T.), u~n ap-
plicati~ of Rob~ T. ~mar~t,
Main ~, ~ent, New York, for
r~o~ition of ~ in ~d-
a~ wi~ S~te of New York Town
~Law, S~ion ~0 A. ~tion of
p~ty: priva~ ~t-of-way, off
{ north side Main ~ad, ~rien~ N~w
York, ~ded n~, ~t and
~sou~ by Harriso~ ~m~est,
and wes~ by ~ M. Dema~st.
7:~ P.M. (,E.D~S.T.), u~n ap-
~pl~a~ion of Williamk J. ~fano
~1822 ~elyea ~rive, North ~ick
New York, for a v~iance in ac-
cordance ~ith ,the Zoning ,O~in-
{ auc.e, ~ticle HI, S~ction 3~, Sub-
}s~tion 7, ~or .permission ~o
~a priw~ det~h~ garage in the
f~n~ yard area 24 .fee~ from the
f~on~ property line on a lot Ioca~-
ed on the south sid~ of ~h~ WesZ
Bra~ of C~p ~n~la ~d
Howell O~n Development Area
Mattituck, New York, bounded
nor~ by right,f-way, eas~ by
A. ~lligan, south by ~e~nic Bay
and wes~ by R. Cahill.
8:~ ~.M. (E.D~.T.), u~n
}plication of Ru~ell Ta~r & Son
Village Lane., Orient, New Yor]
for a sp~i~l~= ex~ep~ion ~ accord.
anco with the Z~nmg O~nce,
!~ti,cle X, ~ction l~3a, ~r per-
mission ~ re~ a farm labor
,camp permit gran~d July 12,
{1~. ~ation of p~: ~s~
side PI~t~ ~, Orient, ~w
York, bounded no~h by W. B.
K~cher & V. T. ~th~, ~s~ by
R. W. Gilli~ie, ~uth by O. W.
Hal~k ~d west by Ylat~ ~ad.
8:15 P.M. (~D.S.T.), ~upon ap-
plicaUon of .~o~e ~lers,
Ca~e~ ~u~an, Eugene's
~d, C~tch~ue, New York, for a
speci~ ex~ptio~ in accor~ce
wi~ the Z~i~ Ordin~e, A~ti-
cle IH, S~tion ~, ~or ~ehe~ing
u~n ,the denial of the Board of
Appeals ~ reduce presen~ f~nt
yard ~t~k from 35 f~t to 30
feet. L~ation of property: ~ No.
306 on map of N~au Poi~ Club
P~e~ies, Inc., Cure,e, ~ew
York, bounded ~r~h by Edward
Kelley, e~t by ~ur ~warz,
south by Old ~ve ~d and West
{by Ha~a~rs ~.
Any per~ d~ ~ be h~rd
~ the ~e ~ppl~tio~ ~ould
appear at ~he ti~ and place
a~ve ~p~i~.
DASD: ~y 23, 1~963, By Or-
d~ of ~e ~hold To~
~oard of Appea~. ltM31
STATE OF NEW YORK, ]
~ ss:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, j
...... t~ ~.~ ~.-.-~f ~L~=.~ ..L_'..~!..~..~..~._.~..~.. ...... being duly Sworn,
saFs tb~t ~'~ ' is P~nte
............ r ~d Publisher of the SU~'FOLK
TI~ES. ~ newspaper published at Greenpo~, in said county;
and that ~be notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy,
h~s been published in the said Suffolk Times once in each
week, for ......................... ~..Z ~ ................ week~
succ~sm,/cly commencing on the
day of ~ / ~.. ~ ~. ................ l O~t.>.~ ....
before me this ~ ,
day of ' , ~ ' ~
Purmu~nt to Section 267 of the ~2vn LaM and the
of the ~mendld Bu~lc~Lng ~o ~d~ce of ~e ~ of
Suffo~ Couty, Ha York, ~c ~gs w~l ~ ~ld by
~ ~d of ~ls of ~e ~ of S~o~d, a~ ~e
7~30 P.~ ~.D.S.T.), ~ a~l~at~on of R~Z~ T.
~ ~md, ~t, S~ ~, for r~t~ of access ~ accoz~
L~Ce ~l~ S~ o~ N~ York M ~, Sect~ 28~. ~t~
OrL~t, S~ York, ~d no~, ~t,/a~ ~ ~r~
Sr. ~d wit by ~ N.
upon applLcatLon of
~~, ~le ~Zz, ~A~ 3~,
1962. LocatJ~n of propert¥~
York, bounded north by w. a.
esot lids Platt Road, Or:Lent,
Karcher & V. T. La~, east
GII:LJJpLo, south ]~ G. W. i~allock and vest J~ Platt Pond.
8~$ P.M. (B.D.S.T.), upon Ipp~c&t~on of George
· s~l ~ce~Mn ~n accor~ v~ ~e ~g ~ce,
~cle Ill, S~n 306, f~ r~e~ u~ ~ ~1 of
s~d ap~ at ~ ~e nd p~ ~ s~c~ed.
So--id ~ ~d of
PLEASE PUBL~H CIICB, MAY 3~, ~Lg&3 AND FOIR~ARD FZVE (5)
AFIPZDAVZTS OIP PUBL2~ATZGM TO THB BOARD OF APl~, BOUTHOLD, Il. Y.
Copiel MiXed ~o ~he folXov~ on lq~y 27, 1963,
ThO Suffo~.k ThUem
Wl11Lmu J. Tufano
Wendell B. Tabor, &/c ~uale11 Tabor & Sons
~eorge Ah~erg, a/c CibrLM
~Qlal ~ AP/SAR AT TH ~
APPLIC~A'I~ON FOR ~a~a..L ~
TO 'I~E ZONIN~ BOARD OF ~, SOUTHOLD, N. Y.
I, (We)
Nanl~
Orient
._of .........V_i_l_l ag e Lane
N.Y.
hereby ~,pply to 'A'~,'c ~ ~ OF APPEALS fO~ a SPECIAL EX~aU~AmON hl accc~h~e w~th the
Z(~U~ oa~m~c~ ARTm~ X S~-r~ON 1003a
T~ESP~O~A~EXu~'~ONm~Q~mSTa~mOAUaS: We wish to renew our farm labor cam
camp permit for the year 1963. There will be no change or expansion
of our camp. Both the Greenport and Cutchogue camps of the Eastern
Suffolk cooperative have now closed, therefore we must house our own
help.
BTA~E ~v ~ YORK )
)...
oou~r~ o~ Suffolk)
.llmml T. BOKEH
Ke~/ ~1~, ~e ~ N~ York
NO, ~-0344~, Suflo~ ~.
~o~m,ssion ~pires March ~, 19~
8~nature
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, ~ YORK
ACTION OF TtI£ ZONING BOARD OF APPEAI~
Appeal NO. ~ D~.ted~ ~,
Appellant
at a mectil,g of the Zoning Board of Appe~h on ~, ~
was considered and the .action indicated below was taken on your
~ ~ I~equest for variance due ~o lack of access to property
~) Request for a special exception under the Zoning O~dinance
I ). RequesL for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance
the appeal
i. SPEC}AL EXCEP'FION. By resolution of ~e Board it was det~r~ that a special exception (~r) be
gl~.ntdd ( ) be del:fled pl~rau~.nt to Article ............................. Section ........... ~ .............. Subsection ........ paragraph
.................. of the Zoning Ordinance, and the decision of the Bulldln~ Ix~pector (~) be reverzed ( ) be
m~l~mmmm~ la m ~mmmm~mm~
& lmmm mmm~ Im Immm mm~m~mm~mm~ mm~ m m ~ m
m ~ W ~mmm e~ ~ ~ mm ~m~U~
~ mm ~:mmm~ mmm mmm mm ~m ~ ~mm~m~ lm~.
~ m ~mmmm~ tmmlmmmmt ~ ~mmt ~mmm m mmda ~ m~mh~ &~
# mm m ~mm~mm ~m ~mmm mmm mrna Immmm ~mm ~ of m m~m.
2. VARIANCE. B~ resolution of the Board 15 was deterrained that ~
la) Strict application of the Ordinance (v~ould)twould not) p:x~duce practical difficulties or unnec-
essary hardahip because
la) The hard,hip created (is) (is not~ unique ~nd (would) Iwould not) be sha~d by all properties
alike m the immediate vicinity of ~his property an~l in the same use district because
lc) Th~ var!ance /does) (does not) observe the spirit of thc Ordinance and (would) (would not)
change the character of the district bec~u,se
and therefore, It was further determined that the requested varia~ce ( ) be granted ( ) be denied
and Lb, at tb.e prc~ious decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed
FORM ZB4
ZONING BOA.RD OF APPEALS
(C~tiauo4 hln frout)
MAdk M ~r ~ ~W of ~ umn. b XhM ~
S~mzoAmre it yea I~,LVE~ that ItuomeXX Tabor & Soma bo gwmmted
fhomld be Ameued utrtLL Oe(Mmber 31, 196~ fo~ ~be bouolmg of ~3 ~tterm.