Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout501~T.A%ZT~. ~AvMoN~_.j' Oak & Broadwaters Road Cutchogue, New York #501 August 30, 196 Page 10 DENIED permission to reduce present setback Oak and Broadwaters Road, Cutchogue, New York. TOWN ~OF $OUTHOLD, NE~V YORK ACTION OF THF ZONING BOARD ~OF APPEALS Appeal No. 501 Dated August 16, 1962 ACTION OF THE ZONING ~OAP/) OF APPEAL~ OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Raymond J. Slavin Oak and Broadwaters Road Cutchogue, New York DATE ~A...~9_~.S..~......3...0, 1962 Appellant at a mectirg ol the Zonkng Board ,of Appeals on Thursday, August 30, was c~nsidered and tl~e .action indicated below was t~ken on your Request for variance' due to lack of access to propexly Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance Req~uesL for a variance to the, Z~ning O,rdinlnce Request for a rehearing upon the denial of the Board of Appeals ..... 1962 the appeal 1. SPECIAI., EXCEPTION. By,resolution of the B~ard it was determined that a special exception ( ) be granted (X) be denied p~rsuant to Article ......... .~.~........Section .....~.Q..6... ......... Subsection ............................ paragraph ........................... of the Zoning Ordiiaance, and the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be reversed (X) he confirmed because : This applicant has not presented any new evidence which would justify the rehearing he requested for the purpose of presenting new evidence. The petition which he presents represents the. wishes of the neighbors and friends. The applicant's property is a corner lot. The house was constructed prior to the enactment of the Ordinance. The front yard on Oak Street is approximately 28 ft. 9 in. The applicant was denied permission to reduce that front yard to 17 ft. The Ordinance requires 35 ft. front (OVSR) 2. VARIANCE. B:~ resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Sl, ri~t application of the O~dinanec (would) (would not) pred~ce practical difficulties or urmec- essary hardship because (b) The l]ard~Hp created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would ~ot) be shared by all preperties alike in the i~nmediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because (c) Thc variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of thc Ordinance and (would) (would not) change the ¢lmrac~er of the district becsmse and therefore, it was further determined that hhe requested varim~ce ( ) be granted ( ) be deni,ed and that the prc~ious declsio~u~ of th, e Building Inspector ( ) be eonfirmed ( ) be reversed. ,-, ApP, OVED , FORM ZB4 ~p'e21$ I ZO~NG BOARD OF APPE&T~ Judith T. Boken, Secretary ~(Continue~ from front) yard where no established setback exists. The lots located east of the applicant's property are unimproved. Ail of the roads in this area are Town roads 50 feet wide. The applicant has not complied with the conditions and standards set forth in the Ordinance for a special exception. The action of the Board June 12, 1962 was taken after very careful consideration and subjected to the highly critical examination the Board's responsibilities imposed. The enclosed porch was erected arbitrarily by the builder who is fully dognizant of the Ordinance conditions and without seeking a building permit, and the plea that it would be an added expense to place the porch elsewhere should not affect the proper use of the land in question and the surrounding properties and other properties in the same district. Therefore it was RESOLVED that Mr. Raymond J. Slavin be denied permission to reduce present setback from 26 ft. 6 in. to 15 ft. Location of property: oak and Broadwaters Road, Cutchogue, New York. LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OP HEARING Pursuant ~o Section 267 of the Town Law and the provisions of the Amend- ed Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County New York, public hearings will be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold, at the Town , Clerk Office, Main Read, Southold, New York, on August 30, 1962, on the i fol owing appeals: 7:30 P. M, (E. D. S. T.), upon applic- alton of Helen P. Thompson, Bayview Avenue, Southold, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zon- ing Ordinance, Article III, S~ection 300, Subdivision 7, for permission to erect an accessory storage building in the front yard of her property. Loc- ation of property: Lots 59 and 60, in "Summer Haven", Southold~ New York ,b°unded north by D. J. Bunger, east by Bayview Avenue, south by Sledjeskl and west by Arshamomoque Pond. 7:40 F. M. (E. D. S. T.), upon applic- alton of Philip M. Lauro, 2038 Schen- ectady Avenue, Brooklyn, New York~ for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 306, for permission to erec~ a residence on a corner lot with reduced front yard setback on one street (In- side Inlet Drive and Miriam Road. Lot No. 24, Capt. Kidd Estates, Matt- tuck, New York. bounded north by D. Strategos, east by Inlet Drive. ~)uth by Miriam Road, and west by T. A. Twomey. !lion of Miilard A. Northridge. Circle Drive, Jamesport, New York, for spec- :,iai exception in accordance with the! Zoning Ordinance, Article X, Section i 1007, Subsection (b), for permission !change the use of his property to a lower classification. Location of pro-, petty: south side Route 25, Laurel, Nev~ York, Lot No. 2 in G. I. Tuthill Subdivision. Property bounded north by Route 25, east by S. Kander, south by K. Tuthill, and west by Venteau. 8:15 P. M. (E. D. S. T.), upon applica- tion of Charles G. Schwetje and Ed- ward J. Smith, Riley Avenue, Matt-~ truck, New York, for a variance in ac- cordance with Article III, Section 303, for permission to divide property into two l~rcels each containing less front- age and area than prescribed in the Ordinance, and Section 280A of the New, York Sta~e Town Law for re- map of G. H. -- W. T. & D. T. Riley~ Property bounded north by DePetris, east by F. S. Bergen, south by Riley /ion of Irving and Eleanor $choltz. !Main Road, Laurel, New York, for a special exception in accordance with tion 400, Subsection 9, for permission I to in, tall gas pumps, diesel fuel and COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~, ss: STATE OF NEW YORK C. Whitney Booth, Jr., being duly sworn, soys that he is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER - MATTITUCK WATCHMAN, a public news- paper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Long Island Zroveler-Mattituck Watch- successively, commencing on the .................... '. ...-& 4. &': ..... Sworn to before me this ......... ;.,'. .......... day of ....... .....I (...{ .... 19 ..:~.~. / oral store. Location of property: north side Route 25, Laurel, New York, bounded north by M. & M. Scholts, east by S. Sounders, south by Route 25 and west by E. Scholtz. 8:45 P. M. (E. D. S. T.), upon applica- tion of Robert Purcell and Anne M. Purcell of Greenport, Ne~ York and Elsa B. Cerbie of Southold, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 303, for permission to reduce frontage and area of a lot located on the west side of M~dison Stredt~ Greenport. New York, bounded north by J. Hel- inski, east by Madison Street, south by G. Smith, and west by Fleetfield Sub- division. 9:30 P. M. (E. D. S. T.), upon applica- tion of Ra~mond J. Slavin, Oak and Broadwaters Road, Cutchogue, New York, for a special exception in accord- ance with the Zoning Ordinance, Art- icle III, Section 306, for a rehearing upon the denial of the Board of Ap- peals to reduce present setback from 26 ft. 6 in. to 15 ft. Location of pro- petty: Oak and Broadwaters Road, Cutohogue, New York, bounded north by Oak Drive, east by E. T. Czavk, south by M. E. Belz, and west by Broad- waters Drive. 10:00 P. M. (E. D. S. T.), Upon app- lication of Raymond Doyen, Oriental Avenue, Fishers Island, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zan- lng Ord nonce, Article III, Section 300, ~, Subsection 7, for permission to erect! detached garage in the front yard area' on The Gloaming. Location of prop-I erty: corner of Oriental Avenue and The Gloaming, Fishers Island, New York, bounded north by The Gloam- ing, east by Montauk Avenue, south by D. V,'. Sinclair, and west by Orieni- al Avenue. Any person desiring ~o be heard on the above applications should appear at the time and place above specified. DATED: August 16, 1962, By Order of the Southold Town Board of Ap- Notice of Hearing Pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the p~o~isio~s of the ~mended Building ~one ordinance of the Town of $outhold0 Suf£olk County, New York, ptlblic heerings will be held l~y the zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold, at the Tow~ Clerk O£fice, Main Road, Southold, New York, on August 30, 1982, on the ~ollowing appeals.. 7~30 P.M. (E.D.S.T.}, upon application of Helen F. Thompson, Bayview ~venue, ~,ou~old, N~ ~, ~r a vari~ce ~ accor~ce ~ ~e Zonin~ Ordin~ce, Art~le ~X~, Sect~ ~, for ~ssion to e~c~ ~ acce~eo~uLl~g ~ of he= pro~rty. Location of pro~=~yt ~ 59 ~d "S~r ~ven", S~old, N~ YO~, ~un~d nor~ by D. J. Bun~r, east by Ba~ Avenue, sou~ ~ $1odJe~, and ~ot ~d. 7,40 P.M. (E.D.S.T.), upon applicatio~ of ~hilip N. hauxo, 2038 schenectady Avenue, Brookllm, NeW York, for a spoclal exception in a¢¢ordar~e w~th the ZOO:LAg Ordinan~, Art:r~le III, Section 306, for pomismion ~o erect a reside~ce o~ a ~rner lot with reduced front yard set~ack on one stroet (Inlet Drive). Location of pro~erty~ mst side Inlet Drive LFld M;J. riala R~d, Lot No. 24, Capt. Kidd Estates, Mattituck, New York, bounded north by D. east by Illlet Drive, south by M~iam Road, and west by T. A. Twome~. ~..50 P.M. (E.D.$.T.), upon &pplication of Mlutlerd A. Northrid~e, Oircle Drive, J~mesport, New York, for a mpoclal eXC~l~tion in accordance with the Zoning Ord~ce, Article X, Section 1007, subsection (b), for 9ermlssitm to change the use of his property to a lower classiticatton. Location of property~ south side Route 25, Laurel, New York, Lot NO. 2 in G. I. Tuthlll Subdivisior Page 2 - Leg..... Notice Property bounded north by Route 25, east by S. Kander, south by K. Tuth~ll, end ~est by Venteau. 8~15 P.~. (E.D.S.T.), upon application of Charles G. $chwetje and Edward J'. Smith, Riley ~,venue, ~ttituck, N~ York, for a and area ~n prescr~d ~n ~e Ord~nce, ~d S~t~n 28~ of ~e New York S~te Town Law for recognition of access, hocation of property~ north side Riley_Avenue, Mattituck, New York, part of L~t No. 7 on mp of G.H. W. To & D. T. Riley. P~oparty bounded north by Deee~is, east by F. S. Bergen, south by RLLey Avenue, , and west by W. S. Serliner. 8~30 P,M. (E.D.S.T.), upo~ applicatiou of Xrw~ug and ~o1~, ~in R~d, ~uzml. N~ Yo~, ~r m m~c~X mxce~ accor~nce wl~ ~e ~g Or--ce, A~cle ~, Section ~00, S~mmct~on 9, for ~l~si~ to ~s~l ~s ~, diesel and kerosene ~ ~e pr~em of ~e~ gene=al mto~. ~on of ~o~ty~ nor~ sl~ Rou~e 25, ~u~el, N~ York, ~n~d north M. & M. s~ol~, ~st ~ S. saunders, s~ ~ ~oute 25 ~ west 8~45 P.M. (E.D.S.T.), upon &pplioation of Robert l~celX and Anne M. Purcell of Greenport, New York and Eisa B. Cerbie of Southold, New York, for a v~xLance~n accordance with the zoning Ord~nce, Article XXX, Section 303, for pe~m~sion ~o reduce ~rou~age and area of a lot located on the west side Mad/men S~uet, ~ruenport, ~ Yo~k, bounded north by J. Helinski, east by Madison Street, south by G. ~mith. and west by Flmmtfield ion. ~ge 3 - Leg~ No, ice 9~30 P.M. (~.D.S.T.), upon applicmtion of Raymond J. slavin, Oak and Bro~dweters Road, Cutchog-ae, Ney York, for a special exception tn accordance w~th the Zonin~ Ord~rmnce, Section 306, for a rehearing upon ~he den~al of ~he Board of Appeals to reduce present setback from 26 ~ocation of pxoperty: Oak and Broadwaters l~d~, Cutdtogue, Hew Work, bounded north by Oak Drive, east by E. M. E. Be~z, and west by BrOadWaters Drive. 10,00 P.M. (B.D.$.?.), upon applic&t~on of Ra~qeond Doyen, Oriental Avenue, Fishers Island, New Yo:k, fo~ a acco~ce wi~ ~e Z~g O~d~ce, A~ie~e ZZI, section 300, ~nt ~rd ~ea ~ ~ ~l~n~. L~at~on of o~len~l A~nue ~d ~e ~l~ng, Fi~ers Xal~d, S~ York, ~un~d no~ b~ ~e Gl~ng, eu~ by Mon~uk ~venue, sou~ ~. w. s~ncla~, ~d wes~ b~ O~A~X Avenue. ~h~l~ apda at ~e t~e ~d place ~e Aught 16, 1962. By Or~r of ~e Sou~old T~ $~d of Ap~alo. ~ ~ISH ~E, a~T 23. X~2, ~ Copies ~iled to ~e foll~ing on AU~St 17, Helen F. ~on Ph~lp M. ~o ~e ~n:~ ls~d ~avele~ttitu~ Hillers A. ~o~i~e $~ ~n ~y (~n he~in9) z~g and Ele~or S~o1~ s~ley co~n/a/c ~rcell Re.nd J. $1av*n APPLICATION FOR ~ APPLICATION NO.,_,6'O / TO 'UHE ZONING BOARD OF API~DAL~, 8OUTHOLD, N. Y. (We) '~ .... ~ ' ...................... ........ .......................... Name Street and Number ~',,"~ ~ooo~' .................................. _~._~ .z~.'. &-.. ....................................... .................................... ~'~'Ji~'~; ............................................ st~t~ ~ereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in acc~dar~e with the THE SP~OIAL EXOE~ ~S lq~UEf:~'A'a~3 B/~CAUSE ~/ /5'PATE OlP I~'W YOI~I ) OO~ OF~~~ Sworn to ~his ...... ~..g2...~/~~ day of JUO~ T. BOKEN Not~ Public, State o! New york No 52.03449~3, Suffolk County Commission Expires March 30, 19(~3 FORM ~0. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTNOLD, N. Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL File .No. Z ~1~3 ............................... Date ................. A~gl~'~ ......... ~ ......... 19..6..~.. To .l~.a~.gPd..,....J.~...8 !aY~.P ............................. Oak & Broadwat~rs Rd ........ C!~.~hgg~.,....~. 7~ .................................. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application d~te~ ..................... A1~1~.~......~.... 19.6. ,~... for permit to constructa~...~.J~.t~9~! ............ at thc pr~m~ses located at ....S..~...c...°.r.P.?..r....0..f ..0~...~..~.0~.e-.~S...R~ ................... Street Cutchogue, N.Z. Map ....M&8.9..~. ........................ Block ........... ~ ................. Lot .. ~ ................................ is ."disapproved on the followinF grom~d~ ..~9.~.e.%e.~..!'r.9~...zard ...... setback o.n. corner !.~, ~.~...~I, ~.ec~.i.~n ~0~.. l~O~M NO. 1 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. Examined ........................................ , 19 ........ Approved ........................................ , 19 ........ Permit No .............................. Disapproved a/c ............................................................................................ Application No ............................. (Building Inspector) APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date .. ...................... , INSTRUCTIONS a. This application must be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted in duplicate to the Building Inspector. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and giving a detailed description of layout of property must be drawn on the diagram which is part of this applica- tion. c. The work covered by this app~LJcation may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the opplica,nt. Such permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the progress of the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in pa rt for any purpose whatever until a Certificate of Occupancy shall have been granted by the Building Inspector. APPLICATION IS HEREBY M,GDE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations for the construction of buildings, additions, alterations, or for removal or demolition, as herein described. The agrees ordin~ applicant to comply with oil applicable laws, regulations. ,,~, ......... (Signature of~p~icant, or name, if';"~;;l~;;;~i~i ......... (Address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder. owner of premises ....~.~.~.~e~.~....~..~...~.#~...~...~.~,~./~.~.....~..:.~'~.Z'~¥.~. ................................................... Name of If applicant is a, corporate, signature of duly authorized officer. (Name and title of corporate officer) 1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done. Map No.: ...~-~.~1~.i ................... Lot No.:-~..,~. .............. Street and Number .....~..~....~..~......~..~-t~...I~ .~,~..~.~i~,~.~... '~"~'"~"~'"~/~J~i~'il~'~ii¥~,' .......................... 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction. a. Existing use and occupancy ............ ./..~...~. .......... b. Intended use and occupancy ..... ~'..~'...~..~.~..~.~.6....../~.~'.~. ......................................................... 3. Nature of work (check which apphcable): New BUdding .................... Add,ition / Alteration .................. Repair ................ ~R~emova! .................. Demolition ............ ~,. Other Work (Describe) .................. 4. Estimated Cost ..... ~.~ ................................................. Fee ....~.....~ (to be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling, number of dwelling u,n ts ~1~...~. ....... Number of dwelling units on each floor ...~..~..~.. ................. If garage, number of cars 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature a:nd extent of each type of use .................................... 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front ...~..~....~.~ ......... Rear .~, ,~..~..~....~. .......... Depth .~..,~..[~....~.. ............. Height .....~.~...~ .............. Number of Stories ..... ~..~'..~...,~...~...~.~..~.¢.~,..~¢,¢.~). .................. Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front .....~..~..:.~..~ ............. Rear ....~...~..:./../..:[ .............. Depth . .~....~'...~..~. ~' Height ....... ./.,~.. ~ ................ Number ' ............... of Star es ................ 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front ...... ../'../.~..~....~. ........... l~ear ..../../..:..~....~.. .......... /.~ .~. · ~ , .. Depth ............................. He.ght ......... '.'~.. ................. Number of Stories ....~...'~..~....C.~.../~....~. 9. Size of lot: Front ....... .Z/~.~...~ ............. Rear ..... ./.~..~....~ .................. Depth ....~?.~....~ ................. 10. Date of Purchase '"~'~'/' '/~"~ Name of Former Owner °" ~'~ ' .......................................................... ~ . ·..~- · ~. · · .~..~.~'~¢ ......................... ! 1. Zone or use district in which rem ses are s tuated .~..~..~.¢~.. ................ P .............. ~.~..~.. 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning ].aw, ordinance · ' 13. Name of Owner of premises .~.~'~.~......~....~'../.~..¥,¢~. ..... Address o~egulat!o,n~ .~..~.. .................................................... Name of Architect .................................................... Address ................................................ Phone No ................... Name of Contractor ..~...~'.~..~.,~.....~'..'.....~.~..Z?..~d..~..¢.~ ........... Address ......~..~..~.¢,~,~.,~.'.~.. ................... Phone PLOT DIAGRAM Locate clearly and distinctly ali buildings, whether existing or proposed, and indicate all set-back dimensions from property lines. Give street and block numbers or description according to deed, and show street names and indicate whether interior or corner lot. ;TATE OF NEW YJDRA~ /7.¢ ~, .' :OUNTY ~ S.~/,¢ .............. ~..~.~...'kf~(.~ .......... being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the applicant (Name~of individual~igning application) ..... ' hove named. He is the ................... (Contractor, agent, corporate officer, etc.) ' ' f said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this pplication; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge a:nd belief; and qat the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the appiication filed therewith· worn to before me this ~:~z:u~4~, s.~fo~ coun~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~' ~ .....  SS~On Expires ~arch 30, August 30,1962 To the Mc~bers of the Zoning Board of Appeals, Town of Southold Gentlen¢n: On August 6th, I submitted to ~* Ho~.~rd Terry, Building Inspector, an application for a buildtug permit to erect an enclcsed porch on a raised patio, now ~isting, ~ud located fii~een (15') feet from the town line on Oak Drive. In response ~'~. Terry issued a notice of d~sapprov~l date~ August 6th identified as File # Z 1843 with reason stated as "insufficient front y~rd setback on corner lot, Article III Section 306 On the same day I filed an application for a h~aring. This application set forth the following. ~ ) The existing structure, excluding the raised patio, ~s built and completed in April 1956. This structure was b~lt by Mtdgely and Horton. It was b~lt ~th the kitchen area located on Oak Drive. The purpose of the enclosed porch is to provide a d~t~g area. 2) To erect a porch at the rear of the house, as permitted un,er present zoning would require relocating water pump, ~ater tank, Hot water t~nk and electrical equipment locate~ in the utility room as-well as Gas T~s located on the east side of the utility room - all at considerable e~pense. 3) There currently exists on Broad~ters Drive(Belz property) am emcloscd porch snd garage five(5)Feet (or less) from the to~n line and directly opposite the home on the ~.~halen p~eperty, built muc$ earlier, about seventeen (17) feet fr~m the t~n line 4) Petitions will be presented (a) Signatures of residents, members of Broad~aters Cove Association Page ~l) cont~d page 2 (b) Sign::tures of residents, not me~bers of Broadwaters Cove Assc. · .~ ~ Petition will identify property owners directly east o~ Oak Drive ~o are directly concerned ~th the type of structu~-e, vie,~4 he~-~th and hazard etc. For the record I submdt here~ith: E~-hibit ~_' ~p of the area kno~ as the ¥~son Development sub- sequently celled Broadwaters Cove. While this .map is not 100% accurate, I believe it is reasonably accurate and locations listed thereon can rea~tl~ be identified by anyone familiar with the area. You ~ll note this area contains only two roads running south from Bay Ave and ~ roads running east fmom Hay~aters Drive. My property is located on the last block running east which in its national course would run into swamp and ~ater. Except for B~y Ave, the entire area is surro~nded by wat er. The shaded area on the map indicated those owners who have signed the petitions. Over 75% of the o%~rs have signed the petitions also Mr Fox,to~n assessor, m~ neighbor to the north has stated that he has no objections Exhib£'~ 'B~ Petitions signed by members of Broadwaters Cove Assc. There are thirty eeven members in the Assc. Thirty three have signed, the other four could not be locaSed. Names prefixed by an asterisk * are owners of property directly to m~ east who, if anyone,should be concerned with type of structure etc. ~hibit 'C' Petitions signed by residents of B~ad~aters Cove ~to are not members of the ~ssc. P&~e 2 co~ pag~ 3 To revert ko Item I It has been stated at offt~he record hearings, that as I have property on the southerly side where my b~drooms are located I could erect a porch there'. As s~a~¢d abo¥~ the purpose of tb~s porch is to provide a dining area· My home ~s built in 1956 I did not contemplate nor should X have been required to fozeeee zoning a%'somc future date. ~nen I purchased this property I ha~ one front, t~o sides and a rear and I set up ~ home accordingly, the house itself is small 24' x 28' ~hlch lfmtts my R~t~g and kitchen area but at the time my housing area ~.~ governed by the l~m~.tations of mypocketbook. Item 2 If my home was ~rected after April 1958 then any relocatiug I would have to do could be classified as a self imposed hardship but as my home was built two years eari~r, any relocating is certsln~y a hardship not self-impesed Item ~3 As exhibit 'A' indicates Oak Drive runs easterly alongside my property to a curve in the road which if runnLug a straight course would run into a s~mp, the erection of an enclosed porch would not alter the character of the neighbor- hood. Furthermore as pointed out above, the Belz property and the Whaten property on B~oad~aters Drive have structures five feet and sevauteen feet f~om the twon line · ~,~ibit 'B' Mr E.Cz~rk is my ~mediate neighbor on the east, he has 150 ft along Oak Drive. Mr k~fle Vibert is ~ediately east of Mr Czark, he has 75 ft. and Mr.C Horton has the re~.'~ainimg lot. These are the people who would be directly concer~ed ~ they have all si~n~d the petition. · ~o~ it has been argued that someone two blocks a~y can readily sign a petition as they are no~ effected but the reverse of this argument is equally va~ ~d and Page~ ~ three cont~d pag~ , that is that someone directly concerned such as ~mediate adjoining neighbors .~ not rea~.~ ? sign an~ p~tition that might imoair their vtew~ be ~sightly~ be a hazard, etc. It has been stated in off the record hc~r~ugs that a variance of this ~-~d has never ,~oen granted, in this respect I should like to ca]l the Boards attention ~o a rather large room that has been added to a corner house at 2nd Ave Main St Ne~ Suffolk. This is within 15 ~t of the town line. Also there is ne-~ home beLug erected on the North Rd in Cutchogue alongside another structure that has not been set back 35 ~ although there is apparently no other houses to establidh a.~lLue. B~' it noted for the record, that this case arose out o~ a complaint. The com- ,kua~t in this case has never come forward to record his objections. He has not appeared at a~ hearings nor has the Zoning Board requested him to do so. There .are thereefore no objections nor objectors yet on 'the other side I h~ve presented thirty five (35) owners signatures to a document which states that ' the enclosed porch ..... is not unsightly, nor does it in our jud~7 .~nt impair the surroundLug neighbors view nor is it a hazard ~$ health and safety~ and any number of these o~ers have offered to appear with me should the Board feel their presence is necessary. Rs~mond a .~u Jvly..~,~ 196Z Town. of'Sou~hold N. Y. Zoning Board of Appeals Gentlemen Whereas the petitioner Ra3rmond.$. Slavin and wife, owner of the property situated at the corner of Broadwaters and Oak Drive, bound on the north by Oak Drive, on the east by E. T. Czark, on the south by ]viary Dunr~(Belz) and west by Broadv~ters Drive, has been ordered by the Zoning ]]yard of the Town of Southold to remove the upper Structure of ar enclosed porch located at the side of his dwelling, facing Oak Drive and/i/teen (15) feet from the town line and has been permitted t ~ ret ain a raised concrete slab on which the enclosed porch is locate [ and Whereas the enclosed pc rch which was .a,t t~.~ point 9f completion is not unslightly, for do ;s it in our judgment impair the surrounding neighbors v/ew, nor is it a hazard to health and safety and Whereas the removal of this structure would cause undue difficulty ...An~ ¢i~nucia3_ hardship t~ the petitioner Now therefore we, members o£ the Broadwaters Cove Association, join with the petitioner in requesting that the Zoning Board reconsider its decision of June ?~-and grant the petitioner relief by permitting him to complete the enclosed porch on the ?%ised con~c.r..ete slab now standing. SIGNED ': (over) Town of Southold N.Y. Zoning Boar~ of Appeals JU ly~t1962 Gentlemen W~nereas the petitioner Raymond J. Slavin and wife,'owner of the property situated at the corner of B~oadwaters and Oak Drive, bound on thc north by Oak Drive, on the east by E.T. Czark, on the south by Mary Dunne (Belz~ and west by Broadwaters Drive, has ~be~n ordered by the Zoning Board of the Town of Southold to remove the upper structure of an enclosed porch located at the side of his dwelling, facing Oak Drive and fifteen (15) feet from the town line and has been permitted to retain a raised concrete slab on which the enclosed porch is located and ~nereas the enclosed porch which was at the point of completion is not unslightly, nor does it in our Judgement impair the surround- ing neighbors view, nor is it a hazard to health and ssfety and Whereas the red, oval of this structure wo~ld cause undue diffi- culty and finsncial hardship to the petitioner ~ Now therefore we, residents of the Broadwaters Cove, not ::embers of Broadwaters Cove Association, Join with t e petitioner in requesting that' the Zoning Board reconsider its decision oT June and grant the petitioner relief by perm~itting him to complete the enclosed porch on the raised concrete slab now standing. SIGNED 0 (over)