Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout407 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DATESeptember 12, 1961 Appeal No. 407 Dated August 21, 1961 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mrs. Astrid Heuer To Bray Avenue Appellant Mattifurk , New York at a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on`rhursday, September 7, 1961 the appeal was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your ( ) Request for variance due to lack of access to property ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance ( 3q Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance 1. SPECIAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a special exception ( ) be granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article................ Section ................ Subsection................ paragraph ................ of the Zoning Ordinance, and the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) be confirmed because 7: 30 P.M. (E.D. S.T. ) , upon application of Astrid Heuer, Bray Avenue, Mattituck, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 303, and Article X, Section 1000A, for permission to reduce frontage and use as a single lot. Location of property: west side Bray Avenue, Mattituck, New York, Lots No. 95 and 96 on map of George I. Tuthill & ors. 2. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) produce practical difficulties or un- necessary hardship because SEE REVERSE (b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the some use district because SEE REVERSE (c) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) (would not) change the character of the district because SEE REVERSE and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( ) be denied and that the previous decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FORM ZB4� `� � _. VJudith� T. Boken Secretary (Continued from front) Mrs. Astrid Heuer, the applicant, purchased a home on Bray Avenue in March 1929. .September 1943 she purchased two lots, No. 95 and No. 96 on the filed map of George I. Tuthill, survey March 28, 1928. These remained unimproved to date. The applicant now requests a variance to enable her to sell lots 95 and 96 as a unit. There are only four lots on First Street, two of them 50 feet frontage and two approximately 42 feet. After investigation and inspection the Board finds that it would be an unnecessary hardship to deny applicant permission to separate lots 95 and 96 from the Bray Avenue property which hag no connection with the First Street lots other than abutting 70 ft. on the rear of 150 feet lot on Bray Avenue which is the side of the 175 ft. First Street property, as shown on attached map. The situation is unique as no other properties in the immediate area ,are so located. The character of the area would not be altered as the proposed division would enlarge the lot area as compared to other lots in the subdivision. Therefore it was RESOLVED that Astrid Heuer be granted permission to reduce frontage and uae as a single lot property located on the west side Bray Avenue, Mattituck, New York. o . c. 2-Wut� �t I' LEGAL, CE Notke of )gearing STATE OF NEW YORK, pursuant to 8e,06tion 267, of the COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, Town Law and the Provisions of _ Building Zone Cr- the Amended B .------- e<....��. ........., being duly'Sworn, dinanoe of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, public says that ...... ........ is Printer and Publisher of the SUFFOLK hearings will be held .by the Z011-1 - Ing Board of Appeals Of the Tawnj Tl•MES, a newspaper published at Greenport, in said county; of Southold, at the 'Town Clerk) Office, Main Road, Southold, New and that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, 1York, on September.7, 1961, on the; has been published- in the said Suffolk Times once in each following appeal: 7:30 PM. (E.D.S.T.), .upon aP-1' 6 week for -------------- ......_�1a<e<..................---------- week plication of Astrid Heuer, 9rayl '. .. Y iAvenuer Mattituck, New York, for successively commencing on the ............. a variance in accordance with the ..........._...._.................................. Zoning Ordinance, Article III See- day of ..._,29.>-R .... 19 .�t... tion 303, and Article %, Section , 3000A, for permission to reduce .. :.. -. . -- ----............... frontage- and use as a single lat. Location, of property: west 'side) Sworn to before me this...J............'......-.....1 _ Bray Avenue, Mattituck, New, York, Lots NO: 95 and 96 an maps day of Of George I. Tuthill & Ors. Any person destrfng to be heard) ..........._ /_. -... . ... ..... -. T ai.A.v� S. Yu WIN on the above application should � I appear at the time and Place _........*PT*R7`-i U$LYC:"S[9tt"oY'NLW70rk.-.... above apedfied... Residing in Suffolk County daryed: August, 24,-1961, By Order Clks. No. 52-5826400 of the Southold Town B_ Commission Exp resMnrch30,196 ' of Appeals. II _ i -r� FORM (%10. 3 - TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD. N. Y. 'r NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL i FileNo. :I........ ............ ........ ......................Date ........ ........... August........221........... 19.61.. To .kstrja...xeuer.. . .......... . ............................ ..........Bray.. Ave............ ..... ... ................................ ............. . ........ . ....... .. I................... PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated ....................August.....22.... 196 ... _use_use�erately Partof lots &93 for permit to)0Mg f .......frcm.. 1ots9`5&9&t t c premises located at ..l'irst..nt...and.. Bray AVe (frontage• on both. street8)...... street Laurelq L.I. Map ...G..L.Tuthjjj... ......._Block ..I=................. ......... ..... Lot -Pt...92&93;. .95..&..96..... is disapproved on the followin,r ground. ..Would...leaVe..a...single lot ..0n..Bray..Ave...o,f...less- than 12r500...sq ft..area. .and...70ft...frontage by...5eperating ..lots...9.rj-A...90...from...thi a..combined...Marcel: . .. . ......... . . .......... ..... ........................ ... .. . ... . ........................................... ..... ............... ..................... ........... ............... ............... .......... ... ... ........................ Building Inspector TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK „APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR APPEAL NO. DATE ..PAVA1,,,,,....... TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. I, (We) Astrid Heuer .............of .Bray„(venue..... . . ............PP........: Name of A ellant Street and Number Filattitucks............................... P7et� York........HEREBY APPEAL TO ............ . Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS M TH DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT . . .... ............ DATE ...... .�'••.•..•9l�•.l•.... WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED ��"� / ktrid Heuer 6 . ........................................................................... Name of Applicant for permit of Brag AvenueD...................................Vattituck, F. Y. . . . .................. ................................................................. Street and Number Municipality State ( ) PERMIT TO USE ( ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY ( x) Permit to sell undersized lot 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY Vest side of Oros Ave.,11W. tituc- k,11Y "A" Res.-Agra. ....................................................................................... . P Street Use District on Zoning Ma Geo X e... ..... ?t�aila..?t...Qtlif�x.5......O.A..&.16 Map No. Lot No. 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Art.Ill,See.303 & ArtX, Sec. 1000A 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (x) A VARIANCE to the,Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (MV (has not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance andwas made in Appeal No. ................................Dated .................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL l ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 ( x) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested for the reason that I wish to sell lot facing -on First St. And retain lot on Bray Avenue, F.?attituck, i). Y. Form zsi - (Continue on other side) p� REASON FOR APPEAL Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces-' sary HARDSHIP because Z wish to sell a 91.641 x 1751 lot on rirbt Street and retain a 701 x 1501 lot cn Foray Avenue and cannot do this without securing a varirance to separate this land. The proposed lot on first Street nould contain yell over 150000 sq. ft. but the lot on Bray Ave. till only be 100500 sq. ft. The Combined are .�s is too Fweat for one lot and this prcpood division is the only practical one. 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because the layout of these lots is unusual. The rear of the lot on Bray Avenue abuts the site of the lot on First Street. Several other lots in this area, cinch: eras laid out in , 50 foot lots prior to Zoning, halve been maintained in single and separate omership as 50 foot lots since Zoning. 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because the lots will each be used for residential purposes in reeving with the area. STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF SuffoZ2s ) ss L'G � ./............................. � . .. .......... Signature Sworn to this ................�. ..............:.. day of......... t:dust................................. 19 61 Notary Public LE ROy S. REEVE., No. 52-S52090p NOWry Public, Stale of New York County of Saflolk Commwsgo fxDires March 30� ly§z � LEGAL NWTICE Notice of Hearing } if Pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the provisions I l of the Amended Building .Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, R Suffolk County, New York, public hearings will be heldby- the � I �' Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold, at the Town . 3Clerk Office, Main Road, Southold; New York, on September 7.,1961, on the following appeal: 7: 30 P.M. (E.D.S. T. ) , upon application of Astrid Heuer, RBray Avenue, Mattituck, New York, for a variance in accordance kl 1 with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 303, and Article X, , Il Section 1000A, for permissionto reduce frontage and use as a IN + single lot. Location of property:, west side Bray Avenue, �'(Mattituck, New York, Lots No, 95 and 96 on map of George I. 'C a �j; Tuthill & .Ora.' j Any, person' desiring to be heard on the above application 111®hould appear at the timme. and place above specified. ;! G adated: August 240 19610 By Order of the j Southold Town Board of Appeals. PLEASE. PUBLISH ONCE; SEPTEMBER 1, 1961, AND FORWARD TWO (2) AFFIDAVITS OF 'PUBLICATION TO THE.BOARD OF APPEALS, . TOWN CLERK �,ORFICE, MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK. � j, Copies mailed to the following on August 25, 1961: y The Suffolk Times o The Long Island. Traveler-Matiituck Watchman LeRoy S. Reeve, a/c Astrid Heuer SI SOMEONE 'SHOULD APPEAR AT THE HEARING �i 4 t c 00 a - . MC e £ — Ivi t JV` E N - -� S. 201 -96 So" �, O /97¢tt- •_ so , S° So so So So So SoSo Sp So So zr So So So So so So So _ So So so So So No So So So So - Sa so So Sp So T. isSo so SP 60 io So so So so sp So 4I6L - - - r 0 R ° I C £ � a o rt� 61 -� r e o � o h `O n � ,�'� 0 W- o. fD ` 6) 0 � M � �r tii � h � • � S• P O � N 'ro � co ° o - ' e s so✓g � g ,� - - - r9� ,2oo [B o �p . � - ` 6 oW o o ° o e7 h p W ° h `0 f1 O ° W `? r m h o pW o - e - N-b � b N " N `� p'1 nI b 1� b �' d' d' b d` d' �' b W '9 h h b b h b! y W b �k1 �0 `B b° �' \D �` M W b m CO y 4;° CO QO - - - - -- } .9s. 10 y, ° F- ti h ° 9 ° ';� F '' _ SQ o So So so- Sa {fa So So q` so So sa So so _ So so so Co so so So Sp So Sa So S. S. 4M So S� So S So Su 'SoV;" _ 9 . se so s so so . se czars w -. - d oa$ o ° - ,, o o • O t` o hP. - - Fps?= v ° 5" � �_"u 7+`T' TM�c_F-/GGbjrrv-.N- - --_ bo° bn° - -- s' .o- O- bp Z1•`2�o i _ , rso 'Fo rsoryI ' bb0 LZWH•tyb° - ^��2D .b° ^h!isors bhbxm 2or's~$sI.o' r s `�^4o '+Ho_ �pl b`• 6 2' y nN 7Sor3) M b Fy 6 b lm b rso 'so pZA0 9T6. _ _ i a V=14S �'" 6 e ,� ° Li ° 0 4 o f ti w O p - m N ^9 b N b M b p o ro R f /moo o - *sl ez 96.6) b b M ry Fo W n �f° M �` d 4 h .sr 2Ye 2-'M �F,ope 2;N l �- - rso 0 b rso V — � . b , _ o: _ _so.oz zs rso.oz 1. - - b v7 p 9 ' int. 7, 2Sofi/ yv iao. —woe – s __ —_ brte- w qO - Mon�r £g2`%N..oF, .44 vJ 4 11� ;� ,P ran fi - u r 4 r ' /T a kVid s a 5 /4N MAP 7 _ SECT / OiV ONE - .t , OF f- PE R7' Y 0,-- 0/:?G E: FORGE /, TUTH / LL c OTHERS S / TCJ/'iTE AT - � here b�J certify that this r+i4� � was vrrude 6y me from, actua/surveys L �� T-o wN of .S ouTHo�p I Corm/eyed March 28��` N Y -Prof FsstowIEn9inenr Gre,erfP rt,Ii $ e L E /o oJi t = i r n= a/rd4a ed SurrcYor Naw Yorirslafe UCense No. IS,B� Ji