Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5224 59R i Nr sF6c tum /p _ 3ti14 Mcg Pr1_ykithlet c17$11 # a/a o/o3 5a q - 'P4 I 4ftriv.3 - , E - co ,ralt- 611 L,ka `APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS foiii gOFF®L4, /A f :� Southold Town Hall Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman , k k _� r=''': :A53095 Main Road Gerard P Goehringer = s -s= a;; £•a;�� g : P.O. Box 1179 George Hornin ; ® �� Southold,New York 11971-0959 Ruth D. Oliva .--W IT/ ZBA Fax (631)765-9064 Vincent Orlando = ;.' Telephone (631)765-1809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RECEWED �1 7, FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION /o;� 6re5, 4. /9 rpt MEETING OF MARCH 12, 2003 Appl. No. 5224— Sprint Spectrum LLP (Orient Congregational Church) Property Location: 23045 Main Road, Orient 1000-18-2-22.1 Zone District: R-80 Low Density Residential Southold Toum Clerk SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning, Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The property contains 73,000+- sq. ft. with 174.25 ft. along the north side of the Main Road, Orient, and is improved with four buildings: (a) church building, (b) one and one-half story frame house, and (c) two existing one-story accessory buildings. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on February 20, 2003, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: APPLICANT'S REQUEST/BASIS OF APPLICATION: This is a request for a Special Exception under Section 100-162A.1 for the proposed installation of a Wireless Telecommunications Facility use, with modular cell indoor equipment (antenna) within the existing church building as shown on the site map prepared by Gary Musciano, RA, PP, dated August 21, 2002. All parking and screening will be determined by the Southold Town Planning Board as provided under the Zoning Code site plan regulations. WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY DEFINED: Chapter 100 (Zoning) of the Town of Southold defines the applicant's proposed use under Section 100-162 as follows: Any unstaffed facility for the transmission and/or reception of wireless telecommunications services or other radio transmission and/or receiving service or use usually consisting of a wireless communication facility array, connection cables, an equipment facility and a support structure to obtain the necessary elevation. The support structure is either a building, telecommunication or radio antenna or tower or other approved structure. [Added 11-12-1997 by L.L. No. 26-1997; amended 2-2-1999 by L.L. No. 3-1999] CODE ARTICLE XVI: Section 100-160 of the Zoning Code allows wireless communication facilities, and particularly telecommunication towers, to be reviewed and approved in keeping with the town's existing zoning and historic development patterns, including the size and spacing of structures and open spaces. Furthermore, the standards herein reflect two preferences: that wireless communication facilities are preferred in industrial areas and _ that wireless • Page 2—March 12,2003 Appl. No.5224-Sprint Spectrum I 18-2-22.1 at Orient • communication facilities be located on existing buildings and towers rather than on newly constructed towers. Any wireless communication facility must take into account the aesthetic aspects of the town, including open vistas, scenic byways and historic districts. In addition, the following provisions apply: § 100-161 . Scope. [Amended 12-8-1998 by L.L. No. 25-1998] The regulations of this article shall govern and control the erection, enlargement, expansion, alteration, operation, maintenance, relocation and removal of all wireless communication facilities. The regulations of this article relate to the location and design of these facilities and shall be in addition to the provisions of the Southold Building and Zoning Codes and any other federal, state or local laws or Federal Communication Commission (FCC) regulations pertaining to such facilities. Nothing herein shall be construed to, apply to, prohibit, regulate or otherwise affect the erection, maintenance or utilization of antennas or support structures by those licensed by the Federal Communications Commission pursuant to Chapter 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97, to operate amateur radio stations. § 100-162. Location of use. No wireless communication facility shall be used, erected or altered in the Town of Southold when located in an R-80 Residential Zone District, except by(Planning Board) site plan approval, meeting the following requirements. (1) Wireless communication facilities on buildings shall require a special exception approval pursuant to this article. Wireless communication facilities on buildings shall be no higher than 10 feet above the average height of buildings (excluding signs, fences and walls) within 300 feet of the proposed facility. The building on which the wireless communication facility is located must be located at least 100 feet from the nearest property line and 300 feet from any landmark property or district listed by federal, state or town agencies. (2) Wireless communication facilities on existing telecommunications towers shall require a special exception approval pursuant to this chapter unless otherwise allowed by the terms of a prior special exception approval. (3) Wireless communication facilities on telecommunication'towersshall require special exception approval pursuant to this article and shall not project higher than 10 feet above the average height of buildings (excluding signs, fences and walls) within 300 feet of the facility or, if there are no buildings within 300 feet, these facilities shall not project higher than 10 feet above the average tree canopy height in that radius measured from ground level. If there are no buildings within 300 feet of the proposed facility site, all telecommunication towers shall be surrounded by dense tree growth to screen views of the facility in all directions. The base of the tower shall be located at least 100 feet from the nearest property line and 300 feet from a landmark property or district listed by federal, state or town agencies. (4) A wireless communication facility is a permitted use, not,requiring site plan approval, if located on property owned, leased or otherwise controlled by- state, federal or town government, provided that a license or lease authorizing.such facility has been approved by Page 3—March 12,2003 Appl. No.5224-Sprint Spectrum 18-2-22.1 at Orient that government. The height of such facility may be established by the public agency. (5) A wireless communication facility is a permitted use, not requiring site plan approval, if located on property owned, leased or otherwise controlled by a special district, provided that a license or lease authorizing such facility has been approved by the commissioners of the special district, and provided that it does not exceed the maximum heights specified above. Standards. In addition to the standards in Article XXVI of this Code, the Zoning Board of Appeals finds and determines the following: (1) The applicant is a public utility. (2) Construction of the proposed facility or modification of the existing facility is a public necessity, in that it is required to meet current or expected demands of the telecommunications provider and to render adequate service to the public. (3) The applicant has made substantial effort to locate or collocate on existing towers or, failing that, that the applicant has made substantial effort to locate on federal, state or town land and facilities. (4) The facility conforms with applicable FCC regulations. (5) There are compelling reasons, economic or otherwise, which make it more feasible to construct the proposed facilities than alternatives. OTHER CODE CONSIDERATIONS: In addition to considerations under Article XXVI (Special Exceptions) of Chapter 100, the Zoning Board of Appeals has given consideration to the following in issuing a special exception approval for a wireless communication facility: (1) The height of the proposed structure/tower is the minimum necessary to render adequate service, inside the existing steeple of the church building. (2) The antenna for the wireless communication facility is situated within a building and is minimized by its proximity and little or no visibility to residential structures, residential district boundaries and landmarks designated by town, federal or state agencies. (3) The wireless communication facility and its antenna(s) are designed and situated to be compatible with the nature of uses on adjacent and nearby property. (4) The wireless communication facility has been designed to use the surrounding topography to minimize its visual impacts. (5) The wireless communication facility has been designed to use the surrounding tree, building Page 4—March 12,2003 Appl. No.5224-Sprint Spectrum I 18-2-22.1 at Orient or foliage coverage to minimize its visual impacts. (6) The wireless communication facility maximizes design characteristics to reduce or eliminate visual impacts or obtrusiveness. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Goehringer, seconded by Member Tortora, and duly carried, to GRANT the Special Exception, as applied for as shown on the site map prepared by Gary Musciano, RA, PP, dated August 21, 2002 This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Tortora (Chairwoman), Goehringer, and Orlando. (Absent were Member Oliva and Member Horning.) This Resolution w dopted (3-0). ��Lydia A. ora, Chairwoman —Approved for Filing 4/ ' /03 ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE ee�4 ` Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK t ea " P.O. Box 1179 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS I ;s:-f,1- Southold, New York 11971 \` 6 �� a •'"��', MARRIAGE OFFICER Fax (631) 765-6145 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER = ""x'14 -4 • lip Telephone (631) 765-1800 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER "72? O. southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals , -_---g [//mai b k;\ ;�`� i FROM: Elizabeth A. Neville I'' DATED: September 18, 2002 y '1 SE� + ` RE: Zoning Appeal No. 5224 Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeals No. 5224—Sprint Spectrum-Zoning Board of Appeals application for special exception. Also included is letter from Lawrence Re, ZBA questionnaire, Site location Alternative Analysis, Affidavit, letter of authorization, owners authorization, short environmental assessment form, lease agreement,Radio-frequency Engineer Affidavit, existing and proposed site plan, Search ring map, list of names, construction drawings, deed and certificate of occupancy. LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY,FEBRUARY 20,2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS NOTICE is HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Chapter 100 (Zoning), Code of the Town of Southold, the following applications will be heard at public hearings by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, on Thursday, February 20, 2003, at the times noted below (or as soon thereafter as possible): 1:20 p.m. Appl. No. 5224 - SPRINT SPECTRUM, LLP. This is a request for a Special Exception under Section 100-162A.1 regarding the proposed installation of telecommunications antennas inside the existing (church) steeple/building, located at 23045 Main Road, Orient; Parcel 1000-18-2-22.1. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives, desiring to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review during regular Town Hall business days from (8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.). If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call(631)765-1809. Dated: February 3,2003. Southold Town Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 (tel. 631-765-1809). 'I , TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK' APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION , 9-10%-.02- Application No. 6-2-2-2-7° Date Fi 1 ed:$,v.oias 2 - TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK: I (ice), Michael McGovern Of Sprint Spectrum L.P. (Residence, House Nb. and Street) One International Boulevard Mahwah ' New Jersey 07495 (Hamlet, State, , Zip Code, Telephone Number) hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS for a ,SPECIAL' EXCEPTION in- accordance with the ZONING ORDINANCE, ARTICLE , SECTION 110-162 , SUBSECTION - Al for the below-described property for the following uses and purposes (and as shown on . the attached plan drawn to scale): Install public utility wireless telecommunications antennas inside church steeple. • A. Statement of Ownership and Interest, Michael McGovern agent for the is( u property known and referred to as 23045 Main Road, Orient x � owner(s) of (House No. , Street, Hamlet) ' identified on the Suffolk County Tax, Maps as District 1000, Section 18 , Block 2 , Lots) 22.1 , which is not (is) on a subdivision:Map (Filed T' and has been approved by the Southold Town Planning Board on as a [Minor] [Major] Subdivision). The -above-described--property was acquired by the owner on B. The applicant alleges that the approval of this exception would be in harmony with the intent' and purpose of said zoning ordinance and that' the proposed use conforms to the standards prescribed therefor in said ordinance and would not be detrimental to property or persons in the neighborhood for the following reasons: See Attachment A ResC. The property which iso the subject of this application is zoned R-80 LowlDensit • and =[ < ,]• i.s .cQns i sten with the ease(s) described in the Certificate of Occupancy being - furnished herewith. C_X] is not consistent with the Certificate of Occupancy being furnished -herewith for the following reason(s) : See attachment A [ ], is vacant land. - COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) - ' STATE OF NEW• YORK) SS. : SPRIN, i, !E.iv'UM .P. • By: Il1gna re Michael McGovern, Sworn to before me •th;is % Director, Site / day of n/ AP-i I1. , 20Q2 Development NY/NJ otary ,c 'I AC ZB2 (rev. 2-/6,-/-B' G/ ,/ Notary Lit! < 1f 65Nj j r u My Commission gyres Jun®i 5,2006 'r• gi‘ 7J • A _ I 1 ATTACHMENT A Sprint Spectrum L.P. (`SSLP") is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission to construct,maintain, and operate a personal communications system in Suffolk County and throughout the United States. It is considered a public utility for zoning purposes. SSLP strives to provide reliable service throughout its licensed coverage area. At present, there is a significant service deficiency in SSLP's system in Orient. In order to eliminate this service deficiency, SSLP must establish an antenna site within a narrowly defined geographic area at a height above ground level, as determined by its radio frequency engineers. SSLP always attempts to utilize existing structures for its sites in order to mitigate the visual impact. In Orient, SSLP identified the Congregational Church as a candidate for this purpose. The site has been designed so that the antennas in question will not be visible to the public. The location has been tested and a determination has been made that if the application is granted, the site would eliminate service deficiency in Orient. This application is consisted with prudent planning and with Section 100-160 of the Southold Code which states that it is the express purpose of Article XVI addressing wireless communications facilities to minimize the visual and environmental impacts while protecting the health, safety, and welfare Southold's citizens and allowing wireless service providers to meet their technological and service objectives. If approved, the building in question would continue to be utilized as a church,but with the additional telecommunications use added. Total f I 92 77/ I, i I \ Tocol �. e— " -\,,,.,, r//--- / F� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER STREET ,, (`,\ VILLAGE DIST. ' SUB. LOT ,,,,..7 ./ 1. 6,;'-(Q ,/ (-�+j `{ t;i{r-n-NA.Pt r. Pte! \ Y j -' •l_ 111 . FORMER OWNER / N 1.,'." ACR. dliii Lod- . WI \, !,(4\PI i 0 VA C CI?t 6 n if_., , 6 24.--- S W TYPE OF BUILDING RES. D SEAS. VL. FARM COMM. C . MICS. Mkt. Value LAND - _ - IMP. TOTAL-- DATE REMARKS / o 7 C3 J/ 00 , c? 00 c� 0 L e2 0/7.----- / ' .-�' rte, 1 1-.D0 3 � 4-90 0 , Z.5'c . r. X . -, - \L ' •J• oil Tillable , FRONTAGE ON WATER Woodland FRONTAGE ON ROAD /•:,..(0 0 • co / t) 0 Meadoyland DEPTH House Plot \ BULKHEAD • Total A - • s _ _ o - , N -OF S ® UTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD ,; r,4, ���c _ --, -STREETi 2-'. - - '.®::r,, _; ._ VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT FORMERV OWNS.r • c r. �/� ?" i 1"7 '` . NEd 1_,,-1-- 4 r t� �- ACR./ S ti i a C-�7 r;,, ( 6 W TYPE OF BUILDING RES. SEAS. 1 CO , , „ , r (r ) ,, Y c _ , N VL. I FARM COMM C:. MICS. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS / Da , � ooPM h J ..2 0 7� > >{., 0 380c) 4-90 c c - ...........1111111111111111111111111111 . , 111111111111111111111 .. . H'1.1111.111111111111111111111111111 - . _ fu � ,� r- f _ _ J ME MN _ . , `' . rk, : ' ' _ IL-a r Tillable :?:: = L ' 1"-NAGE ON WATER Woodlandinimine s , . Me�dowloMd is TAGE ON ROAD �; 00 ,f House Plat mow . ._..._. b, • Total i" ./(: .22 p TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD—CARD ARD OWNER STREET -- 0 4 r VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT �� \�=` FORMER OWNER ( E N ._ ACR. I , W TYPE OF BUILDING / RES. SEAS. VL. FARM COMM. CB. MISC. Mkt. Value q -�RSONUGC= �a�t (0a0 LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS • °, a/ // / L.- /r3 I • O O C 0 0 O J 0 0 3 I/4•S''''' ta , i.-, .- rA . !' _ -' ' ' .6+ / "% r f Toa DD-, 1/ 76 /�iD Q _�' a (36c. - �_o s- e-�- t- - f AJd -��Dn --0eiu1,�1 , / 7ov 1`x'300 // 6o . >' ? `r « ' _ -s 4, 22 0 MEM 1 5 2.0 .:,) -,,/ a ) 5 L % a. / - �f� X83 access() 2�m 0 15 (b(-)0( c[ ' 17 Soo , "7 97 AGE BUILDING CONDITION t NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE FARM Acre Value Per ValueMir 's Acre Tillable 1 .111.11.11111I Tillable 2 ._ t Tillable 3 C 1Yr k 9 ..."-r-T Woodland Pa'c', 3TrU � Swampland FRONTAGE ON WATER f Brushla_nd FRONTAGE ON ROAD - � Z - / �a ? House Plot DEPTH BULKHEAD - - �- - Total DOCK _. . C a W a w a'---003312 1. A !dObd anOHJ.nOS dO N1 IO1 Y ` f -- 1`..'''''''''' ' , /4Z Z6 t°401 _ - "8 -0 of;°,d a6°a°0 �C°nnaniJ a A°Mazaa i 8 . .iaw:Joa yoaod 8 "NIS aool3 pU suaooi - WOO uol;°aaoa>J 4°aod .21E1 Joold ;s L suaoo� �I" }ooh{ ad�(1 �a • Gv*?..2 S ;oaH "a'�t 0/V ao°Id aal�` p74, Z 'ZS { p72/ 9/ k P/ uolsua;x3--- a ,jy S /7 */'r 6 uolsua;x3 . :1-1 7 d LIsluld aolaa;ul P71 sll°M �x3 l 1 ) aR!/�/ saoold r' ;UaulaS°8/L E�� ct Zs ie..,f" `/ ASO O/ uolsua;x3 a;;aula `EI ,..3_, v' uol;°puno� �� Z - 7 � 7k 6PI2 "W Sv 1111.11111.11.111.1111 4/ x _ F,. Xaa■■■■■■■■■■ V ! • 11■■■■■■■■ 1111■■ ■11■■■ M 1 1111■■■■■■■ -.z — =� � �� EINE■■■■■■ �� _i _:�__- , -_ _ _ fr; ,,„., , ■ENE■EN■■E z� --- ..... ________ - 1 1111■■■■NE■■ -isit'isl i ., _ ;%, 4' .. ■E■NEEM■ENI -� — l' -� , 11■■■1111■■■■ 210-100 . •;.,xl{r t z ,y"r ,N" a f i?�..:� , „f// .'fealL'-�- `r, �.3.:',�_- �,-,-it?'-gid-,: - ~'=- May 27, 2003 Mr. Gerald G. Newman, Chief Planner Suffolk County Department of Planning P. O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Dear Mr. Newman: Please find enclosed the following application with related documents for review pursuant to Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code: Appl. No. 5224 — Sprint Spectrum LLP (Orient Congregational Church) Action Requested: Special Exception, Telecommunications antenna Within 500 feet of: ( X ) State or County Road ( ) Waterway (Bay, Sound or Estuary) ( ) Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State, Federal land. If any other information is needed, please do not hesitate to call us. Thank you. Very truly yours, LAT:pq Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman Enc. Southold Zoning Board of Appeals ',RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT , TIME : 04/18/2003 10:41 DATE,TIME 04/18 10:38 FAX NO. /NAME 4254104 DURATION 00:03:04 PAGE(S) 06 RESULT OK MODE STANDARD ECM A I 0004 4 y Z � { Town Hall,53095 Main Road '�t Fax(631)765-1823 P.O.Box 1179 �0 ��p�// Telephone(631)765-1802 Southold,New York 11971-0959 =_ I BUILDING DEPARTMENT • , TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OCT I I ,?_ MEMORANDUM TO: The Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Damon Rallis, Southold Town Building Department DATE: October 11, 2002 SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR PERMIT Project: Orient Congregational Church (Sprint) Location: 23045 Main Road, Orient SCTM# 100—Section 18 -Block 2—Lot 22.1 This is to reaffirm that the Southold Town Building Department has determined that the proposed wireless communication facility,proposed at the above referenced property,requires a special exception by the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals,based on Article XVI, Section 100-162A.1,which states, "Wireless communicAtion facilities on buildings shall require a special exception approval pursuant to this article." , 110/1P Ra i. I OFFICE OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Email addresses: Linda.Kowalski(a,Town.Southoid.ny.us or Paula.Q uin tieriAT own.S o u th old.n y.u s Jessica.BogerATown.Southoldi ny.us http://southoldtown.northfork.net (631) 765-1809 fax (631) 765-1823 (alt. 9064) 41 ° COVER SHEET FOR TRANSMITTAL ATTN: 0,12 / o/)Jc/WtEJ. DATE: "/i /d /2003 REF: A/}L MESSAGE: ,1l-aL,/„� = i, Adel /a-z) yie-a4) &-i7 a-6v oee.tavAded 4 f8 wee; rtD. � Cl Please feel free to call if you did not receive all sheets. Town Hall hours are between 8 and 4. Thank you. 0,6_,„„L Pages to follow: 7. ,( to COUNTY OF SUFFOLK A ` r; TV, t � /142 ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE THOMAS ISLES, AICP DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING DIRECTOR OF PLANNING June 9, 2003 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A 14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the following application(s)submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is/are considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or a disapproval. Applicant(s) Municipal File Number(s) Kirkiras, Fotios and Fotini 5170 White, R and L 5214 Woodhouse, John and Jerilyn 5218 Sprint Spectrum LLP (Orient Congregational Church) 5224 Dickerson, Charlotte 5256* North Fork Bank 5277 Fishers Island Club 5290 Burns, Philip and Joyce 5297 Dinizio, Paul 5299 Chin,Nancy 5312 Kalogeras, George and Stella 5320 *Alternative relief appears warranted, particularly as set forth by the ZBA. Very truly yours, Thomas Isles Director of Planning S/s Gerald G. Newman Chief Planner GGN:cc G\CCHORNY\ZONING\ZONING\WORKING\LD2003\JUN1SD5170 JUN LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H LEE DENNISON BLDG. -4T1-1 FLOOR ■ P. 0. BOX 6100 ■ (5 1 6)853-5190 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY. HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-0099 TELECOPIER(5 16)853-4044 5 • qPb J� l AFFIDAVIT SPRINT SPECTRUM, LP 23045 Main Road Orient, New York 11957 Suffolk County Tax Map # 1000-18-2-22 . 1 DATE OF HEARING February 20, 2003 PREPARED FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Main Road Southold, New York 11971 PREPARED BY LYNCH APPRAISAL LTD. 294 New York Avenue, Suite 2A Huntington, New York 11743 (631) 427-1000 AFFIDAVIT OF MICHAEL J. LYNCH STATE OF NEW YORK ) SS7 : COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) MICHAEL J. LYNCH, being duly sworn, deposes and says : 1. I am President of Lynch Appraisal Ltd. with offices at 294 New York Avenue, Huntington, New York. I am a certified New York State general real estate appraiser. I have been qualified to testify as an expert witness before the Town of Huntington Zoning Board of Appeals and Town Board, . Town of Oyster Bay Board of Zoning Appeals and Town Board, Town of Hempstead Zoning Board of Appeals and Town Board, Town of North Hempstead Zoning Board of Appeals, Town of Babylooh Zoning Board of Appeals and Town Board, Brookhaven Board of Zoning Appeals, Town of Smithtown Board of Zoning Appeals and Town Board, Town of Shelter Island Zoning Board of Appeals, Town of Islip Planning Board, Town of Riverhead Planning Board, Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals, Town of Southampton Planning Board,,' as well as numerous incorporated villages throughout Nassau and Suffolk Counties . 2 . At the request of SPRINT SPECTRUM, LP ('Sprint' ) , I have inspected the proposed site that is the subject of this application. I am fully familiar with the site, the neighborhood in which it lies, and I am fully familiar with what is proposed by Sprint. 3 . The proposed Sprint site in the hamlet of Orient, Town of Southold, calls for the installation of six (6) panel antennas internally mounted within the steeple of the Orient Congregational Church. There will also be associated equipment cabinetry within the basement of an adjacent 1-story frame building to the rear of the church. All conduits, cables, etc. from the antennas to the equipment cabinetry will be concealed and underground. The church and 1-story building are within a 1 . 68 acre site that also includes a 2 . 5-story residence. The property is located along the north side of Main Road (S.R. 25) , distant 211 . 64' east of Youngs Avenue. Zoning of the site is "R- 80" Residential . Abutting properties include a public school to the north and east, and 1-family dwelling to the west. Opposite to the south along Main Road are additional 1-family homes and the Orient Cemetery. Nearby properties include the Orient Fire Department just to the south/east, and commercial properties just to the south/west. Accordingly, it is my professional opinion that the proposed Sprint site will not negatively affect property values in the surrounding area, and will not have an adverse effect on the character of the neighborhood or the pattern of its development. The site will be completely concealed and out-of- sight to area residents, while property values, neighborhood character and pattern of development have already been well established by the existing conditions, uses and zoning within the area. 4. In addition, my opinion is supported by studies we have conducted regarding other wireless facilities . We have studied the effects of the installation of wireless telecommunications on water tower sites at Langdon Road, South Farmingdale, New York, and Arlington Avenue, Franklin Square, New York. We have studied the effects of an existing 300 ' lattice tower on new luxury housing homes at Southwoods Road, Woodbury, New York. We have the studied the effects of a rooftop wireless site at Glen Cove Road, East Hills, New York. And we have studied the effects of monopole antenna sites at Rte. 110, Farmingdale, New York; Port Washington Boulevard, Port Washington, New York; and North Country Road, Shoreham, New York. These studies are summarized as follows : A. Water Tower Site, Langdon Road, South Farmingdale, Nassau County, New York. Wireless antennas went on-line affixed to this water tower site on April 1999 . This tower is situated in a stable residential neighborhood comprised of a relatively homogenous group of split-level style, single-family dwellings . Our staff compared sale prices of homes in the immediate area (up to 3 blocks away) before and after the on-line date of the antennas . Our "before" data, which included eleven (11) sales running from 4/96 to 1/99, was compared with "after" data, which included twelve (12) sales running from 5/99 to 10/00 . The average price per square foot of the homes in the before and after groups was 33% higher for the latter, but statistically similar after adjusting for market appreciation. This leads the appraiser to conclude that the antennas did not lead to a devaluation of nearby property values . B. Water Tower Site, Arlington Avenue Franklin Square, Nassau County, New York. Wireless antennas went on-line affixed to this water tower site on January 1998 . This tower is situated in a stable residential neighborhood comprised of a relatively modest and homogenous group of single-family dwellings . Our staff compared sales data (price per square foot) of homes in the immediate area (up to 3 blocks away) before and after the on- line date of the antennas . Our "before" data, which included eight (8) sales running from 11/95 to 10/97, was compared with "after" data, which included six (6) sales running from 3/98 to 7/00 . The average price per square foot of the homes in the before and after groups was 21% higher for the latter, but statistically similar after adjusting for market appreciation. This leads the appraiser to conclude that the antennas did not lead to a devaluation of nearby property values . C. 300 ' Lattice Tower, Southwoods Road, Woodbury, Nassau County, New York. An existing 300 ' telecommunications tower sits along the west side of Southwoods Road, opposite Shannon Drive. Across the street from this tower is a series of housing developments of luxury homes that were built from 1994 to 1999 . Many of the homes in these developments are within clear sight of the tower. In addition to researching overall sales in the Woodbury-Syosset area, we included looking at other home sales within the same developments that were not within direct sight of the tower, but otherwise similar to the affected homes . Our research indicates that the selling prices of the affected homes far exceeds the average selling prices of homes in the Woodbury-Syosset area, based on Multiple Listing sales data. Furthermore, the selling prices for the affected homes was similar to that of homes within the same developments that were not within direct sight of the tower. The following data reflects sales of homes along those streets within view of the tower, and average sales prices in the Woodbury-Syosset area: PRICE RANGE OF HOMES (FROM 1994-1997) ALONG SHANNON DRIVE, PIRONI COURT, AND CHAUNCEY PLACE: $500,000 - $747,000; AVERAGE $626,000 AVERAGE 1997 SALE PRICE IN WOODBURY BASED ON MLS DATA: $491,565 AVERAGE 1996 SALE PRICE IN WOODBURY BASED ON MLS DATA: $434,647 AVERAGE 1997 SALE PRICE IN SYOSSET BASED ON MLS DATA: $402,878 AVERAGE 1996 SALE PRICE IN SYOSSET BASED ON MLS DATA: $357,172 Our research has concluded that the presence of this tower has not had a negative effect on real estate values for those homes that are within sight of the tower. D. Rooftop Antennas, 70 Glen Cove Road, East Hills, Nassau County, New York. Wireless antennas were affixed to the rooftop of this 3-story office building in late 1997 . This building is bordered to east, north/east and south/east by a relatively homogenous group of mid-priced single family dwellings, sharing similar appeal and utility. These include Colonial, Cape and Split-level styles, and are situated within the Red Ground Civic Association. Our staff compared sales data of homes in the immediate area (up to 3 blocks away) before and after the on-line date of the antennas . Our "before" data, which included eight (8) sales running from 10/94 to 4/97, was compared with "after" data, which included twelve (12) sales running from 1/98 to 8/00 . The average price per home in the before and after groups was 20% higher for the latter, but statistically similar after adjusting for market appreciation. This leads the appraiser to conclude that the antennas did not lead to a devaluation of nearby property values . E. Monopole Antenna Site, Rte. 110, Farmingdale, New York. A 120 '± monopole was erected at the south end of a retail store parking lot in approximately Fall 1999 . This property is adjacent to a residential neighborhood comprised of modest- priced, detached single-family dwellings of Hi-Ranch, Cape Cod and Colonial styling, all sharing similar utility and appeal . Our staff compared sales data (price per square foot) of homes in the immediate area (up to 3 blocks) before and after the installation date of the monopole. Our "before" data, which included eight (8) sales running from 12/98 to 9/99, was compared with "after" data, which included eight (8) sales running from 6/00 to 8/01 . The average price per home in the before and after groups was 28% higher for the latter, but statistically similar after adjusting for market appreciation. This leads the appraiser to conclude that the antennas did not lead to a devaluation of nearby property values . F. Monopole Antenna Site, Port Washington Police Department, Port Washington Blvd. , Port Washington, New York. A 100 ' ± monopole mounted w/cellular panel and police antennas was erected on this site in approximately August 1992 . This property is adjacent to a small residential development comprised of a homogenous group of mid-priced single-family dwellings . Our staff compared sales data of homes in the development before and after the installation date of the monopole. Our "before" data, which included ten (10) sales running from 8/89 to 8/92 , was compared with "after" data, which included fifteen (15) sales running from 11/92 to 12/96 . The average price per home in the before and after groups was nearly equal at $302 , 750 vs . $302 , 465 . The real estate market during this study period was relatively level . This leads the appraiser to conclude that the antennas did not lead to a devaluation of nearby property values . G. Monopole Antenna Site, Rocky Point Fire Department, North Country Road (S.R. 25A) , Shoreham, New York. A 100 ' ± monopole mounted w/cellular panel and emergency service antennas was erected on this site in approximately December 1992 . This property is adjacent to a stable residential neighborhood comprised of a relatively modest and homogenous group of single- family dwellings . Our staff compared sales data of homes in the immediate area (up to 2 blocks) before and after the installation date of the monopole. Our "before" data, which included eight (8) sales running from 2/91 to 9/92, was compared with "after" data, which included thirteen (13) sales running from 6/93 to 11/96 . The average price per home in the before and after groups was nearly equal at $132 , 438 vs. $131, 577 . The real estate market during this study period was relatively level . This leads the appraiser to conclude that the antennas did not lead to a devaluation of nearby property values . 5. In summary, we found no correlation between the presence of wireless telecommunication' antennas and declining property values in the seven Long Island residential communities we studied. As such, it is my opinion that the proposed Sprint site will not have an adverse impact on the subject property or the surrounding community. MICL . LYNCH Sworn to before me this da. of Febr rg 2003 . Or- 0 NOTARY PUBLIC LAWRENCE C. Re Notary Pur,hc• _t New York No ,3 '• Qualified i ; ..; r.,: Counts ®� Commission Expires May 31,`__..., SPRINT SPECTRUM LP ;y - ------ .,, ..,.. 4,.. ,.... • . .....,... _ Ili $ I•! a V. 4 _ 1 -_ LL. VIEW OF CHURCH LOOKING NORTH FROM MAIN RD. #2 VIEW OF CHURCH LOOKING SOUTH FROM PARKING LOT #3.VIEW OF REAR FRAME BUILDING II, Pie Vr . , fi P(4 • 7' a. . Ift 11n�an n . #4 2.5 STORY DWELUNG(PART OF SUBJECT PROPERT) #5.PUBLIC SCHOOL ADJACENT TO SUBJECT TO EAST #6'SCHOOL ATHLETIC FIELDS TO NORTH OF SUBJECT f— y 6yrs ---,� '' { I - _ `� s._ #7:1-FAMILY DWELUNG ADJACENT TO WEST OF SUBJECT #8:1-FAMILY DWELUNG OPPOSITE TO SOUTH OF SUBJECT .- ORIENT CEMETERY OPPOSITE TO tIE OF SUBJECT � r-t • i 1.$'.t;(5.: '1•''X 41' J' al1 ,. 4 J ! " f,"411311.0 P. 440� 7 - — k ...: - 1'341_,)1.. !11 : _ • : *MM LI la #10:ORIENT FIRE DEPT.AT SIEIC MAIN RD.&TIBOR RD. 1-FAMILY HOME AT SIEIC MAIN RD.&VILLAGE RD. #12'VIEW OF HOMES ALONG EIS1DE OF YOUNGS ST, LOOKING ST TOWARDS SUBJECT I s ..I. s• • tt IV `. ` . .fAM aOt , 1111 - U•1111 Al 12214 f II.E• k 211.1 12.122(4) STATE YOF MEW 2020( s•c.l 41110112 "..e. 1y w fIt. ` vti`sI � , O<fTM.pmf IF . ;_,__ lJw�At UMOFREE f�MOOI MST. 013131wO 111.3 a- CEM CON10133.113W. .. M!: ____ ir iii ilk Att. irt M t Lf, -.. V* (:) est.mmol. ,1 14 1 w• " .. .z a1 ar• Iliyiktligk j4! : � i NM 2-2 . •113.0r i. .aTLlK LC . On WC Es Off .. 1 1 uO.Y°x« PCS -_ AN-NKA ce EO EIBR¢ABS 5-cC Aa 3/Z6 S ;P 0RE3 SECTORS CS RERACC°,1°`,T SECnOR _ SEE JEIAa 2/25 MON 6'ABOVE UPPER ANTENNA — 0 6•B E.CNL4CTm it:4i 5 �--{{ 62-10 2• >-{ 62-10':ALL sE 14'OF 3) =y2` 2 ROE AN-ENNAS 3_i R w AN,NICs --� tF C_or 4TEAS lecuss •i s ANTENNAS -- =1:.r.- REPLACEMENT Pulp ESECTION(FROu 6 ABOVE UPPER ANTENNA 1 —�- `JVT�1T�' ECNSECTOR ANTENN 5 _. �--- ?B.K sNEPIE o 6 B[ALSEE 0E74 2/OW OP Z6 B SE6 CC'1SCC C •— _� v C ABOVES[nSTI GNCMV CM COAX I-- PROPOSED SPRINT PCS COAX CABLES ' -A^- �'1^ BA4 6 BfLL 1pxE.¢ ��'E- ?BA-,OE BEu TOPER - RUN UP EXITING CLOSET - 4�_ - N�R��NJ ce LL - 1 AP CABLEOSED S INTCMOInT RW EXISTING stw I TNG ORIENT _ 1--- - \ Attpp T STRUCNRE TO CxISTNG .'� o,l a tawEc:naNAL wuxw --- , 6ce E z"...„..._,,.\ .C5Y tt / STRUCTURE E _._. .. _ _ _ _ y — __ _--- _ __ - --- c C--==--� PROPOSED SPRINT PCS COAX __ _- _- _ EPMM[NT SVA¢ -_� -_ ..-r _ PRC'T SaN CCSOUrt i— >- 1 C--- OPOSEO Ni PCs ® u GRADE GRADE 1 SOUTH ELEVATION ')EAST ELEVATION I SCALE.1/6--I-D SCALL I/6.I-0 is 2w• V s,aL IPE]-6 TIP PROPOSEDBERGLSS PANE L /mIS- CROSS SECOCN 0 6OAKa `" BRACING ABOVE 1r 5B *LE hma .°. ' „ R BiACna ( O CT LoGATICANTENNN rP FR2 SECTORS) liD ® J • ro D efin wn TEP vER 1 I, LiSPR Fer- P, i g 7. ; MAIL 3/16 _ EXISTING•000 BLOM.AT iv.11 ANA STEE.PI OW SPACE DOLTS 70 ALLOB EMS B A WIRELESS NCA Rassso oou - ANTENNA ROUND. 9D[BEN REAR'PM uODEI ulc-Otp-10 - - 8411 CSW 6 R.R1 B0. 0Ap 1 Fusnxc.00p BEAU TO EPSTING STRUCTURE w•TM /26ceCw6 iII GµV 5-PI/[A s�vu TIRE o ENLARGED ANTENNA -I --- -oAscw STEEPLE MOUNTING DETAIL FLOOR ]/R-.1-0- 1. LJ ANTENNA DETAIL ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL --- 3 SCUE.,n 4 SCOE Herbst • MuscianO CROSSROADS CORPORATE CENTER }�,' ORIENT CONG. CHURCH Sprint PCS 3 082202 FOR 1 INTERNATIONAL BLVD SUITE 800 Arch.iteCtS/Flanners EDWARD R HERBST,RA, PP we GARY MUSCIANO, RA,PP WE 23045 MAIN ROAD 2 022602 FORREVEW MAHWAH, NJ 07495 4 C-51>E NJ M E.;07B TEXAS RA 1541) 740 CEDAR KNOLLS ROAD W w 411 NJ PP 4211 RRA 1020 ORIENT, NY 11957 1 0920DI FOR REVEW BUIIE 209 PA u n11eR-B CT CO 021557 CRI RA 5 0INDOOR EQUIPMENT AND ANTENNAS ELEVATIONS & DETAILS ®AR NCE 97 NJ 07927 CT CO 7557 OCTO RA 10925 SECTION 01800CK 02 NO DME RMA ER5 IELER[ORE 973-538-3815 NA RA 1013 OC RA 6057 LOT 022 001 SITE NO NY33XC678B SCALE pROE[i IMAGER DRAWN BY JOB No ORAPoNG NUMBER DATE REASON FAX 973-538-4095 ARA 10131 D RA 110.19 AS NOTED MS MA 56780 5678AZ05 0912 01 0 NOINR `S R1 sTE PLAN a BAND a A NCY MCAT=a.PEcwc Adm« nA OPD BOE ROR+w .uRR STRUT sWNm..„ O R.LS.U..FARM 0.0 SEMI E.20,RW1 ?' ]w i ...... ......21:_.77,5 GYSTERP CiP:o gE;gcr`rzr:O¢N.N,v*ED NOL'N))NOUN BE AL NATER.SHALL BE ruRNENTED.0 NO...BE h I. _p_, �L.�Sc ccUN /GN F,OEE SC'iOQL D/STRICT ' ONE)) TI O C-001°vECTICAPSWxow a:N,TRuCl�csµmD OW ,I` EDENCE POWER&TELEPHONE UTILITY GENERAL NOTE R. ewttnOn[ar gRxtt POD a+IwN.rzwNo�O.x))Ern O h _ -�� UTILITY cad>N�as.No�.RiPiaR e�D PURPOSES ONLY 4e v 30,23 p•• CwNAC•W 9 COCA..NN u+un CONPANY FOR ANAL "CC"..,-7-_ 4 gy • m inuTY.NCT O.,.INCA n.P.AS AND SPEONc:rO'O'"si CT lD CC 0•- " '�`�� CONTRACTOR suu/TU..AND INST.ILL CwDd,Pull 01 H CS CABLES PULL BLARE CONCAVE ENCASE...K CO.. LR REDA.)...CANER P B INCAS Pm R.95,TR.. Z U 2 ARs v SCRIZ-°°E N)1\ ^ uJ 'k PROPOSED EciT ttueysTD,'N r BACs.P.ALL TIDO,COUPAN.TEES AND INCLUDE u. EXISTING BCOJJIREu(Ni5 w scop[a NauN W R W I - 1 ACCESSORY STRUCTURE P N IN FR SITE WORK GENERAL NOTES J `P.. R V M1'u 1 To�sITTOTW°WALT L UDURES PR.TO NE START N S E ALL nnsnNG ACTIVE SEM.NATER GAS ELECTRIC AND OTHER —II— ;Ra' _:■$ u ES.ER:,� �ENCOUNTERED R�E,�E�Rm BE PROTECTED I •�� '�o.0 9.1.1 BE RELOCATED AS dRECrzD BY ENGINEERS. T ;i: EXISTING Q E. CAUTION R OnD C A..Di NmLN .UDEN [['�� 1 STY FR ^ EXCAVATE.N TMTRp0.Sm.PR° E WEEDY MI..o T.2 ra+NNG N II .!in 0I �ruN •22 GAR - N B)E.X1.ssA¢q 000 m.*AArt1T.°)TmE.awc P00.11. CLN EV III S SNWLATED EN TIC SPCEAS DNINNTD°NICG PROJECT 9pNONY ANO II !i AS PRO.ED BY SPAN/ li ti . ETURSNNLL RUBRNA /TPS DEBwz SDN$SlwEs ANO 100US II i. C) 0E RENO.LO,RW THE SITE ANO d5PO5E0 Or IEGLLY I A ENING A A 5 NE SITE SNALL'BE WADED 10 CAUSE SU..DATER TD RON 5 I H E E CS[OUP..AND TONER AREAS NO nu OR M.N../ETTATERIAL. PLACED.FRO. I!I PRWOZCO$PRS PCS is B Wow°OLLFROM [uB�xiwCxS SNOr OR ESxNA x0 BE¢D Ipi ANT Il�C�BE AS S6 S°NRLEI /NE SUBWADE STN.BE CWPACTEO AND BRWWT TO A SLIOON O .90...E PR.10 rRPsrtD.AnCC APT... 2s 1 Z Ni AREAS Or THE OWNERS PROPERTY dsnmem BY NE Nous AND cocT+m e.THE BUS..W DRIVEWAY . BE WADCD To m III Ta y D wTM REQ1.g°AADDEE:offNNNDLcx J,IR i j CONSTRU..PACTOR EROS.CONIVCA N[ASURES tCE TO r KO SITE PANG 4 8C /o a -161 :�_ C R ce5O NES NOR[AMIOc[AwN cSeuEtix[ONTwR LLrn LOC)) w \ PROPERTY OWNER 59 Cr NU2 m� Wi/w Nb O rW - u, W / p u o t' EXISTING N EXISTING �I€ 3 a ■=MONUMENT 1 FR CHURCH A 21/2 STY O • •=PIPE c FR HSE ") ', 8x - _ ITS IIs ..5-.' p '" NTA cD d••.UD .CFO Z IN /j,m Z I, N .as TDs N w O RwT Pa 1 Q.ANTNNAR AREA=1 6759 ACRES 3' a RTEEP s¢SEE,:. 4 Q N P 2)7 64' - ' .SIGN CONCRETE SOEwALN 774W 25' S 84 39'70' NOAR N 87'58'20" W 57 69• S 87.54'50' W41 27' 1 CONTRACTOR DTHA OST N[NUU THE D141DC5 NARK.OUT MAIN ROAD (S.R. 25) BY iO AL BY won YWdo AUNWITY RCENSED..E.RETANE0 B R1.GENERAL a,A SITE PLAN CROSSROADS CORPORATE CENTER Herbst ' Musciano j` 3 082202 FOR ZONNG 1 INTERNATIONAL BLVD SUITE 800 ORIENT CONG. CHURCH Sprint PCS MAHWAH, NJ 07495 Architects/planners EDWARD H HERBST,RA, PP NIL GARY MUSCIANO,RA, PP DAIS 23045 MAIN ROAD '' 2 022602 FOR IEVEW Al 1KN 47'/1 AA C-5177 NJ RA C-80]8 TERAS RA 15477 240 CEDAR9KNOLLS ROAD Nru 0.sal NJ PP.1151 n.RA 14044 ORIENT, NY 11957 1 0410DI FOR REVEW SUITE 209 PN RA WRY-9 RA 0]158] RI RA]0.10INDOOR EQUIPMENT AND ANTENNAS SITE PLAN & NOTES CEDAR KNOLLS NJ 0]92] CT RA]54] ONTO RA 10925 SECTION 018 BLOCK 02 NO DAZE REM50NS TELEPHONE 9A-538-3815 ARA 8254 OC RA 5052 LOT 022 001 SCALE FREEC7 RAMER. DRAWN BY JOB No DRAWING NURSER DATE REVISION FAY 973-538-4095 RA RA,out VD RA 11039 SITE NO NY33XC678B AS NOTED JWS MA S678A S678AZ03 09 12 01 0 Z O N l IJ (j- PA{} • • 4 114 \*,* -4 •- l '‘ 1 f %kik vslioricict..• - / 4-\. .41'0413` -,.r' i,) ill , % \ , \ .,074, , / I #4- , *, A#4Tiraraimiso - J rl I ifi ki -s.. -,,Ik.•44 . / ,3 ,..-- • \R 80 o no 0 ii, _ /24\ 474. as Laile•`,,Avila4" hunt, 14 BinrE A .RO•.-� o i ;1 '`-� tfk*.*-4 V s i 4,0 ' Rue)-.___-_,'4,67.0 4 4 0444 47 iii/ , \ , , R R _...Wirt. gi!oh •,-... \ 4 ‘-.\N. 441.4. M I , 11:44141*.S 4114 040. \\ 0'' ' , \ 'NOV% 1. ._:( 11 illiki 1\ R-80 • �d�� �xy0.E AyE 1 P fr d -' �� � IMOilit\Ifi 0 • I Iiii.co.: Fi-200 -.:_.;; 11..„1.41,0 :i4,10.mimia.. • 11/11, ' • V)- oi ciR-200 ,t'''' Wir4rdiotA , ION VN, - i• V4P* ' ir ,,, ., oc4 r 1 1,- 9 0 vb4 ,)/1?-5) ej) U z t PLANNING STUDY PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY ORIENT CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH 23045 MAIN ROAD, ORIENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK Prepared for: Sprint Spectrum,LP Crossroads Corporate Center One International Boulevard - Suite 800 Mahwah,New Jersey 07495 Attn: Ms. Roe Carey Prepared by: Freudenthal& Elkowitz Consulting Group,Inc. t 1 368 Veterans Memorial Highway <11 Commack,New York 11725 II (631) 499-2222 z n February 2003 Table of Contents Page Introduction 1 Existing Conditions and Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility 2 Land Use and Environmental Analysis 7 Findings and Conclusions 12 Figure 1 - Site Location Map 3 Figure 2 - Site Plan and Notes 4 Figure 3 - Antenna Plan and Elevations 5 Figure 4 - Zoning Map 8 Figure 5 - Search Area 11 Appendix A - Photographs of Site and Surrounding Area Appendix B - Correspondence from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Appendix C - Curriculum Vitae of Theresa Elkowitz,Principal and Ginny Watral,Vice President of Freudenthal &Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. INTRODUCTION A planning study was performed for the proposed Sprint Spectrum,LP public utility communications facility to be located at the Orient Congregational Church(consisting of antennas mounted inside a steeple and installation of associated equipment within an existing accessory structure), situated at 23045 Main Road,Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York. The subject site was examined as to surrounding land use, zoning, and environmental conditions. A survey was performed and the area was reviewed in order to determine land use on the site and in the surrounding community. In addition, the Town of Southold zoning maps were consulted to determine the zoning of the site and surrounding area. 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility The proposed communications antennas and associated equipment of Sprint Spectrum,LP are to be situated within the Orient Congregational Church, in the hamlet of Orient, Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York(see Figure 1 - Site Location Map). The property is designated on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000-Section 18-Block 2-Lot 22.001 and is developed with the church, accessory structures and paved parking areas. The proposed project consists of the installation of six communications antennas and the replacement of portions of three panels within an existing church steeple to facilitate transmission of communications. The antennas will be completely concealed behind new fiberglass panels to be installed in the steeple. The project also involves the installation of associated equipment cabinets in an equipment room to be located in the basement of an existing accessory building north of the church (see Figure 2 - Site Plan and Notes). The equipment will be connected via underground cables in a conduit from the existing accessory structure to the existing church. The church steeple will house the proposed Sprint Spectrum, LP antennas, the top of which will extend to 64 feet-1 inch above grade level(see Figure 3 -Antenna Plan and Elevations). Fiberglass replacement panels,which will conceal the antennas,will be affixed to the exterior of the steeple. 2 Site Location Map i 1, aa'. - ; � r $= `+ + �'` '+. + ' / ' /�' Mtn %. - ,,,,/�i' /:.1. r;'',fj,,,\,11 ' 7 •k /' .. 19._ / .,P4i-,',`;'-44,..," ,.,,c ✓y ice"-. .: P ^/ �..° 'i. .'+ , +'f-28 + , 3'8- +•y. `,r'� ,.✓I' 4�: �"i„Tri 6-..7;r.;' P /\./ '.'.�; • - ,,I',1-:.:1_• - -..- -/-*\ : .... .. .•�' // 7 JJ/// •`y'i9dL�15{--``' ^vet -+rfl'f7.?11t'y ,„-,-f-,;,-",� �.v,....•,i •'�C� \, "`—+..�• {. •,, ,, -+ , -- - , ' , ,'ff t ,,,of mow- ' c ;a� �J r .4y e \ .`1 N+ _ ' 3 ,�'^+, 24 - ...� ,=^i 2.4 •... z. "� _I'l'X17 '' Y \x'G.�/� `. ;. , �;.. ., f` LOCA J N' * ,., \i , , - , 19 f.r,'. .,..,y f e." ..u.•. -- ?,1 Q, ! !f 1•1 (2->i i� l / -. C. \• V4 J,J„ ,�'AV'''y' Li A' y�-,.:', ",,..':. .e ..'',..„;-•6>At. ', ,/ ! 1 _ F ;°'Cern dl jy.....ti ~,3} ''4'`',';.F.:,-.' :-."1 ''`i`/ ,..ele,ce.;";4'-,f;z•'"'„e1 ;6:,. „N-�f „.-...-+ ` 'y'L3 .nd`Prle'21t n1a,„m.� /` ///�S '`u.'-.affs-.'7 r:j.'. _`x�*��7 „•O .1 _ '..'.;,.,h, ”' *r!s is i O ;a'^r:.�'''°�r• .t. //i.... $ tY ,....-.t.'-';',7ff,:•''<cl ...-, ''''''.1 ,t*** ' ''''' '. .* -' 'I( ',c,,,\*' '", .1, , J ; /i'\7 ho'C�u By: ��,4: , l } y•...: �y� 5 Rte '" ,.. 'PE N T ' '' ' -s\:' \7.'....;t:',fe\--\. :iz,,,,„ . , :,. -,)\ "- .— ,,,,,,;*-7 „ , 7 ` ,/�' ~1 ` • ' � i -• 1 1 .2/ r . Nx.PetersNeci ,-.: t: 'GARDINERS , %f9 ,, . , BAY` /r '-/pPt:; r ,�; � , - r 7 Source: U.S.G.S. Topographic Map, Orient Quadrangle Scale: 1:12,000 FREUDENTHAL& ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Figure - Site Location Map 3 - • '' NOTES 1. THIS 97E PUH IS BASED ON A SURVEY PROVIDED BY PECONIC 2T6' __ S ,,. C) .57-6- 2. ,5' SURVEYOR'S 1230 TRAVELER Sllittl SOUTHOLD.NY 11971 JOHN MATSCEFt,LS UCENSE#49618 DATED SEPIETIBER 20,2D01. 1-73 2. NE PROPOSED FACILITY PILL BE UNMANNED AND LULL ONLY BE (0• __ `O•• E RPpNpSUFIECT S °MON f• I 3. ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE FURNIMAINTENANCE Nm ANO'PARK SHALL BE PERFORMED 0 CO (L! __�-��IN uHK N REE SCHpp� D/S IN ACCORDANCE C-mTH TMESPECIFICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION. CDTHE ORL ACHED ct o _ TR/CT s„uAKE PRECEDENCSE Cr CONFUCT E- POWER SHOWN ON THE DRANVIfS O POWER 8G TELEPHONE UTILITY GENERAL NOTE: Q ;� 'rte _ _ 1. AL SHOWN ARE RASED POINTSTILITY ! FELIYNARY NFQL1An (ON ONLY.ED(PRRONDED BY THE -3 a� ^ i ( • _ `3p2 3 p, UTILITY COMPANIES AND ARE FOR BID PURPOSES ONLY. / 1 2.CON7RACTOft STALL COORDINATE-NTH TE PATH UnUTY COMPANY FOR FINAL - ARU7 DUCT YIIX2K/LAn3LALS REQUIREMENTS AND CONSTRUCT 10 ULT FENfS UTILITY COMPANY ENGINEERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. I, ( CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISRM AND INSTALL ALL CONDUIT.PULL WIRES,CABLES.PULL BOXES,/.....„.........„—NEW LOGITION-SEE , 323' NEW PRMT PCS 4 ( W�1RANSFZ)f211ER PADS,B HERS,PILE TENCASEMENT OF pE1lWING ZDETAIL 2/A3 EWIf+MENT CABINET IN EXISTINGEXISTING BACKBIT...PAY ALL UTILITY.COMPANY FEES AND INCLUDE AU. y ACCESSOR OF REQUIREMENTS IN SCOPE OF WORK. _ diaiiii, ACCESSORY STRUCTURE - +. /O ©_ is SEE SHEET AB' I �_� ! SITE WORK GENERAL•NOTES: I I __.E_.III-: ,/ I 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL.CALL UTilITIE5 PRIOR TO THE START OF _ CWSTRUCBON. LOCATION.� SEE -_...-�__Q_ ._. __ -I11 4Zr CO• I2.ALL UTILITIES Dams Ti G ACME ENCOUN SEER m IN THE GAS.ELECTRIC.WORK.FOR THE _SHALBE AND PROOTHER AT DETAIL 1/A3 EXECUTION CF NE � uRA/N 1 S�'I�N GAR. =� UJ I WORK,MES.AND WHERE SHALL BE RELOCATED REWIRED DRECTED BY ENGINEERS-EXTR E CAUTION O 422' N SHOULD BE USED BY THE CONTRACTOR AWOL EXCAVATING OR PIER DRILIUN6 Ur AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES. %CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY TRAINING FDR THE WOR UNG CREW.THIS NU_INCLUDE BUT IS NOT LIMITED NNSEE r10 aN TION I I TRENCHING FAIL dr PROTECTION B)CONFINED SPAY C)ELECTRICAL SAFETY D) 3.ALL SITE YAW(SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWING N AND STIPULATED IN THE SPECIFICATION PROJECT SUMMARY.AS 4 PRO.IFV10BY SPRY,RUBRRT. THIS SHEET V A s a• O NECESSmARBSRM,STUMPS DEBRIS,STICKS ONE STAND OTHER P AL TNEW SPRINT i REFUSE SMALL BERELOWD FROM THE BITE AND 013P09D OF LEGALLY. 5.RHE UTE SHALL BE QRADm TD CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO UNOERQROUNO~.A% V O I FLOW AWAY FROM RHE PLS ETUIIPMENT AND TOWER AREAS B.NO FlLL OR ELBAKuENT MATERIAL SMALL BE PUCE ON FROZEN • CABLES TD • 'D•R I GRWNO. FR02IN MATERIALS,.SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANTENNAS SEE DETNLS ANY FlLLOR FSHBANI01FJ7T. 2 Ac 4/A7 _..k• V/-... �7 �\ / AND BROUGHT TO A 2 Ct SMOOTH LUUNIFORM-GRADE PRIORBGRADE SHALL BE AFINIISSHED SURFACE APPLICATION. Q] \} i B.THE AREAS OF THE OWNERS PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WPO(MD ii11 N �6.4'�III�►�� / ill i UNIFORM SLOPNOT COVERED E THE BUILDING NSEEDED,ANDNCOVERED WITH M AS AY.SHALL BE GRADED TO A ff • ` I SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIFICATION LANDSCAPE WORK. Q I D, MITA' /� , ! DURING CONSTRUCTION.9.CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.IF GSTE REWIRED Z �� i /:io TO ( DURING CONSTRUCTION,SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL / S9'm a� / ..._:"-e. GUIDELINE FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL i } 1 / SB' '- + J ! 10.PROVDE 1REND1 PROTECTION STED..PLATE PANELS CAPABLE CF SUPPORTING AUTOMOBILE TRAFFIC. I �I i-- c!r PROPERTY OWNER: ! ..11I '4 35.4 Q I ORIENT CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST. } 4.1' EXISTING W nu FROST sn-218-9400 < CHURCH < m EXIS-TING a c1 J� 27043 MAIN ROAD ORIENT,NY 11957 WFR21/2 STY. g 3 •=MONUMENT "f F I F FR. HSE. 0 ®=PIPE y x=j 19 I X= 11.5' 115' 0 I W • h I W "*.$ .� CO o l al 0. l -�.. N h - I II 1.` Z 1' I RI_/ TEE' IO6' I N I NEW SPRINT PCSCO I 91 o I �� e AREA=1.6 759 ACRES _ 6.7 I < T3.6-2 I < STEEPLE SEE SHEET A5 0 1 J BRAJG I - .:E BRICK I I 17 - �i I 'w I 6'S FE 211.64' 1 m o 8 f I j ( + SIGN 4 - N.Y.S. L1C. NO. 49618 I CONCRETE SIDEWALK PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. 174.25' S 84'39'10" W (631) 765 - 5020 FAX:(631) 765-1797 N 87'58'20" W 57.69' S 87'54'50" W rum,. PIAFST ROAD S.R. 25) 41.27 P. 0. BOX 909 I CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE ALL THE UTILITIES MARKED OUT ; 1230 TRAVELER STREET i BY THE LOCAL'CALL BEFORE YOU DIG-AU7HCNITY. SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 ! 1-800-272-4480 2 ALL SITE LAYOUT WORK C•IALL BE PERFORMED BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR RETAINED BY THE GENERAL I CONTRACTOR. SITE PLAN SCALE. 1'-20'-0' . I I 1 lerbst .- Muscian®- _A•_ I I CROSSROADS CORPORATE CENTER ORIENT CONG. CHURCH Sprint PCS I I 1 INTERNATIONAL BLVD. SUITE 800 Architects/Planners EDWARD H. HERBST, RA, PP DAZE. GARY MIJSCIANO, RA„ PP DAIS- 23045 MAIN ROAD -� MAHWAH, NJ 07495 NJ RA C-3177 NJ RA C-8078 TD(AS RA 15417 240 CEDAR KNOLLS ROAD NJ PP 3387 -- NJ.PP 4351 FL RA 14044 ORIENT, NY 11957 1 040902 FOR fEVEW SUITE 209 PA RA 011184-8 NY RA 021687 RI RA.2030- SECTION 018 BLOCK 02 INDOOR EQUIPMENT AND ANTENNAS SITE PLAN & NOTES CEDAR KNOLLS. NJ 07927 CT RA 7547 OHIO.RA 10925 NO.: I DATE REVISIONS TELEPHONE 973-538-3815 VA.RA-8254- DC.RA 6052. LOT 022.001 SITE NO. NY33XC678B FAY 973-53R-4095 MA RA 10131 MD RA 11039 SCALE: I PRD�CTUANAGfR DRAWN BY: { JOB No I DRAWING NUMBER! DATE: I REVISION AS NOTED I JWS MJL I S678 I S6780A04- 1 03.27.02 -� 0 Figure 2 - Site Plans and Notes - 4 • Jt A NEW SPRINT PCS A NEW SPRINT PCS - SECTOR ANTENNAS LECTOR ANTENNAS NEW FIBERGLASS REPLACEMENT 7YP 3 SECTORS r TIP.OF 3 SECTORS PANEL SECTION(FRON 6-ABOVE r.I' SEE DEEM.5/AS SEE DETAIL S/AS - UPPER ANTENNA TO 6-BELOW " • „n LONER ANTENNA)O EACH SECTOR li3 ANTENNAS(TIP.OF 3)SEE ug, 67-10-f A ��11,� .GL lam 62'-10"1 AGL FIBFRQASi DISCS. &wi 1 - c.0. r ANTENNAS Ira � 1' C OF ANTENNAS 11-9 * 1 ',I, 43rt CF AN59'-70-1 A.OA.G.!.f;r:11 " TENNAS . ' CL OF ANTENNAS Jr ; 5`l 1� NEW FIBERGLASS REPLACEMENT , ', +. „r III ,k, PANEL SECTON(FROM 6-ABOVE UPPER ANTENNA TO 6'BELOW l: 1'j ' • { A i ni .r 4 A. LOWER ANTENNA)0 EACH SECTOR r T I f GR BASE OF S trLE ANTENNAS(TTP.OF 3) i_.._. T SEE NNASFIBSICLASS OF + f 4B•-6-f A.G.I. - - BASE OF STEEPLE '- 1 I i ! i1 im NEW SPRINT PCS COAX CABLES ABOVE ^� ' COSTING CHURCH ATTIC • o .'� " ;- 37-R A AGL' 37-6-t A.G.L l_i 1 I BASE OF BELL LOVER —1{ BASE OF BELL TONER II J NEW SPRNT PCS COAX CARES RUN UP • IN EXISTING CLOSET t I--I ^`\ % •��RlICp•,1111111IIIr1111111HE, II111uI•I01111111111tlg1111 f` I-_t ��-ALE lI4IVU11111I11t111g1I, uIuuuI11g11111RI1u1111uri- r 111v'LuTuruII 111111,• 1111111III111g11W11tmouni11 _...,,„,..... _. / 40.- 'TNG EMT 71R111IIIIFBEipg1UIN11Ul r' 1111101WIg1111Hu1111/1UIII1�11Iq NEW SPRINT PCS UNDERGROUND COAX i_N / �\ CONGREGATIONAL ETIONAL ORIENT �111.11111111MNRll1131I ' ' I1I111111111111111111111q'SIAM INIVIIIMR 1111LDUI1 • ACCESS IN CONDUIT FROA COSTING CHURCH CONITiECARONAI.CFARCIL � .IIg71gq111NU111 I r I11W I IHhI1111pg111NID 137.1 AVIA 1D1111110I1111IIG1111 CHURCH.S STRUCTURE TO EXISTING _ ��,Ismuf11g11111W1 t rg1141111111111g1t11111111g11U7lP,HIN,11111F31111I1Ig1!:11111Q11 CHURCH.SEE DETAILS 2 h 4/A7 T 1, J1111gR111g1' •'u ,Illlltlgll0N7IgIWIMI/,t,:•.JI1/11�111NIpIR/ii1111111" q--. `\_ �gIJVIV1 t - _• MIA In�man�il�IlRng 111111 .mn�.�101Yta,rw1 ir.___,_ ' - �� i~ g11RIgNIWIIAI �f I; _� �� r i� + 11 It i __-_._.__._.__..._ .'. ACCESSORY t Ii I��; it 1 Ii STRUCTURE i I��I I I II—A I 1 in Ew CPS UNIT MOUNTED m SDE 1���) o I , I, I - OF COSTING ACCESSORY �-�T • STRUCTURE r .-r I) s 1-1 I . 4 �� I,I_AilliI"" SEE DETAIL 7/A7 c U c c CI c , 11N �Itl� 111 EIV'FEINT PGS COAX CABLES •1 1 —. utY�ill1ll1u�Il�� 111 � GRWND iCOfSEIaAHTSE TO �- 0000001 1—. - iitil lPCS Oafl+•-� I e e ele c c � II II 1 �' 11 1 I I gh �T�I ��`p�l EOOe 11ENT�5PACE 1 Vli 3g 1 �T7, � r SEE SFREET A6 F��' f I CRAf1F �� I I II �� ��� r F - 1 I 1 SOUTH ELEVATION I I -LL-1.---L SCALE: 1/B-m1•—O 2 EAST ELEVATION 1 SCALE. 1/B`-1•-0- _ • • 2_75 ,� e Ts ilp mj \ 1n- t g NEW 2 1/2 0 GALV STEEL^ •I :////--EXISTING 57ETSLEPROVI1 (8 PIPE \ TOP VIEW i II a STINGGass - I. PANEL SESECTIONEW N FIBERGLASS 6�64- II I, BRA@1G ABOVE T3 •' ABOVE UPPER ANTENNA 10 NEW SPRINT PCS ALPHA SS' 'I 6"BELOW LOWER ANTENNA) ANTENNAS ]'l O EACH ANTENNA ANTENNA) (1W.CF 2) d5 WIRELESS OP71F'A.l.DUALP0. 1! _ _ SEE DETAIL 4/A5 ANTENNA YCOEL RR6515000P 'I /S U-BOLTS 8 11 WITH MECHANICAL DONNRLT KIT ;1k' NEW 1 NEW 1/z-UCSG7Eves ' I 2 MOE_YTC 070-10 EYP_CF 2 PER CONNECRON _� \\ i%� iii‘ ` •4 EYP.OF 2 PER CONNECTION \\\ /�// .•`.�� PROVIDE NEW FIBERGLASS PANEL II/0. , I \\ EIW SPRINT PGS SECTOR i_ �+�'�1 Kr COSTING WOW BUCKING AT =coot+ FROM a ABOVE UPPER , ANTENNAS ti ■ `.\ !y �� ANTENNATO6'BELOW LONER s i SEE DETAIL 4/A5 -� Ir-� 13.1 ABOVE sTEETtE FLOOR NEW SPRINT PCS I``""\QUI%-- / I .e`27S B' I . \r • i _ ANTENNA)O EACH ANTENNA c /—'' ; 1\11' r .�GAY4A 210• jllll LIGNIN {� .ASECTOR ANTENNAS �� �h1 �,� (TIP.FOR 3 SECTORS) 1II(TIP.CF 2) ZSEE DETAIL 4/A5 r *V. //// \1\ "./" NEW 67(4"X6-X7/4.4"LONG/ r/ \�\ / BENT STEEL BOLTED TD EXLSTING • . _ ii�' NEW 8ENT STEEL"XI/4"4'D 10 1/ W000 STRUCTURE c• 'a —j! _ ' r--E]ISTMC WOOD BEAU UNE CF COSTING 6 4 W/1/z-LAG SCREWS r, m _ BENT WOOBOLTED TO BELL TOWER NG EXISTING WT)OD O SCREWS �\ ��� III W/1/Y LAG SGiENS NEW 2 1/Z'0 �.i • r GALV.STEEL PIPE SECTOR RINTTdPCS�BETA 150- SDE HEW REAR MEW J j \ . 't. DOSRNG W000 ENLARGED ANTENNA , (TIP OF 2)T -.1!----.1,* 13-0•ABOVE STEEPLE STRUCTURE 0-BOMOUNTING DETAIL 1 � �i 1; FLOOR SCALE: 3/4"-1'-O - U :. CD 3 STEEPLE/ANTENNA PLAN SEE DETAIL 4/A5 A ANTENNA DETAIL , ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL SCALE: 1/4`-I'-0" SCALE 1/2"..1'--0' SCALE: 1/4,- -43"-1•-• Herbst -- 1�1 fano ( �1` I I CROSSROADS CORPORATE CENTER ORIENT CONG. CHURCH ---� Sprint f C S I 1 INTERNATIONAL BLVD. SUITE 800 EDWARD H. HERBST, RA, PP W - GARY MUSCIANO, RA, PP DATE I I MAHWAH, NJ 07495 �� e Lam• I 23045 MAIN ROAD NJ RA C-6t77 NJ RA C-8078 TEXAS RA 15417 t 240 CEDAR KNOLLS ROAD NJ PP 3337 NJ PP 4351 FL RA 14044 ORIENT, NY 11957 1 104.09.02 FOR REVEW SUITE 209 PA RA m11U4-0 NY RA•221887• w RA 2030 SECTION 018 BLOCK 02 INDOOR EQUIPMENT AND ANTENNAS ANTENNA PLAN & ELEVATIONS CEDAR KNOLLS. NJ 07927 CT RA 7547 = OHIO RA 10825 Na. I DATE. REVISION'' TELEPHONE 973-538-3815 VA RA 8254 DC RA 8052 LOT 022.001 SITE NO. NY33XC678B FAX 973-538-4095 IAA, A 72531 AID RA 8052 I SCALE PRO,ECT MANAGER •f DRAWN BY• ,IDB No DRAWING NUTABERI DATE 1 REVISION AS NOTED JWS i MJL S678 56780A05 1 03.27.02 Figure 3 -Antenna Plan and Elevations 5 Existing Conditions of the Site and Surrounding Area The proposed public utility communications facility site is to be situated at the Orient Congregational Church property. As previously described,the antennas will be mounted inside a modified portion of the steeple and replacement fiberglass panels will be installed to conceal the antennas therein. The equipment cabinets will be installed within an equipment room in the basement of an existing accessory building to the north of the church. Thus, the proposed antennas and the proposed equipment will not be visible from the exterior. Currently, the site is developed as a church with accessory structures. To the south, west and northwest along Main Road are residences. North of the site are the Oyster Ponds Elementary School athletic fields. West of the site are residences and the Oyster Ponds Elementary School building. In order to better depict the nature of the surrounding community, photographs are included in Appendix A. A detailed description of the land uses surrounding the site is contained in the section of this report entitled Land Use and Environmental Analysis. The visual environment of the area contains overhead wires and utility poles. The proposed project involves the installation of communications equipment within an existing structure, thereby eliminating the need for the erection of a new structure (i.e., a monopole). As the facility has been designed to be completely concealed within the church steeple and accessory structure,there will be no adverse aesthetic impacts or impacts to neighborhood character. 6 LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Land Use of the Site and Surrounding Area The site is located in the Low Density Residential R-80 Zoning District(see Figure 4-Zoning Map). An examination of the surrounding neighborhood indicates that the general area of the proposed communications facility is a mixture of institutional, residential, and commercial uses. Land uses surrounding the site generally follow the zoning. The land uses and zoning of the surrounding area are as follows: North: North of the site are the Oysterponds Elementary School athletic fields. The zoning district is Low Density Residential R-80. South: The Village Cemetery is across Main Road to the south. Farther south are residential areas and some businesses. The zoning is Low Density Residential R-80 and General Business B. East: The land uses east of the site include an adjacent residence and the Oysterponds Elementary School. The zoning is Low Density Residential R-80. West: The area to the west of the site is primarily residential followed by a coastal area bordering Orient Harbor. The zoning is Low Density Residential R-80 and Marine I. 7 Zoning Map of the Town of Southold , } FT ; a igle111� t • ---- ---.-s--,. .0 •iftt / illiit a 441111.1P11°1 C,PIP Pl. ' 111 111 �, ri -VON"a. _ 4,12.974,47,4%r ..l -.., 4.441,-: -4-..:.-,:t. . 2\n:',V.4'"'- ..*41firlift.1-4111 le.... U11\ : - , % tia a %ice'"':, .��.S1TE 1a 1 mania ,T• eti„..e. -off`_ 11� tv t,•q�,� �ss l 0-.:,R`. 4, 1• ' ' �� Via' . F--74-5,- , A k,r. r6-.1,...„. ''--/- I\ 1 ,j-;;•=1,,.....i V7-31,-Vi..iip'4e .04.7 .4 • 4\40r ,:ini . ...„1,,,„0.,,,. \.,. ..... ..410._ . , .,.., ,,,, , . .i. ikt--. A. . i 44, 80 /�•r�; Agnwitural Consenrahon 1 •� n-arc Residential Low Density AA ' ET Residential Low Density A �,; A`+Id.1� :. . -1` � R- a , Residential Lw Denaly B 0„`FI, �..�'; ' �, Residential Lw Density C ,, lir Q- f • ET 11 _Residential Low Density D / :////r -,..7-.------, -I- Ha.i Homle Densly Residential �� !L'i rt�. .��!!}} + Vii/i 4. i s I Resarf/Residerttial '�� Residelliai/Office �� r� t," N., . . . Le Limited Bunneas i r'- _Ne' Homier!Business . lir ni General Business ilik,,,,,_- !e'erMarin I �� � B r Marine n \� roc, ', MN Lightlndustrid/Office_Park - �L , { Light Industrial • h: 1-Amo r, Affacdabit 1.101.151119 [tat. Source: Town of Southold, November 12, 1996 FREUDENTHAL&ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Figure 4 -Zoning Map 8 The site is located within an area in which Sprint is experiencing a service deficiency gap(see Figure 5 -Search Area). The search area is that in which the public utility communications facility must be located to address the service deficiency gap. The search area is generally bounded by Old Farm Road to the south;north of Maple Lane to the north; east of Diedricks Road to the east and west of Black Lane to the west. The area is generally residentially-zoned and developed. From a planning perspective and given the search area, the proposed use of existing building interiors for the installation of a public utility communications facility is optimal. The area in which the facility is proposed is primarily characterized by residential uses with limited business development along Main Road. Given this, the use of an existing structure is appropriate and harmonious for the proposed public utility communications facility. In addition,through the use of stealth material, placement of antennas within the steeple and with associated equipment in the adjacent accessory building, the applicant will provide a desirable service while minimizing the effect on neighborhood and visual character. Environmental Considerations Since the site will be unmanned,there will be minimal impact on the environmental conditions in the area. The facility will not generate sewage or solid waste and will not need to be supplied with potable water. The traffic generated by the proposed project will also be minimal- approximately one trip per month to check the equipment. There will be no significant impact to soils or topography nor will the proposed project affect area drainage as the facility is to be situated within existing structures. Since there will be no sewage generation or water use, there will be no impact to surface water or to groundwater quantity or quality. The site is not located in the 100-year flood plain,and there are no wetlands on or adjacent to the site. Therefore,there will be no impact to such resources. 9 It should be noted the proposed project was reviewed by the New York Sate Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation(NYSOPRHP). The OPRHP indicated in correspondence dated March 27, 2002 (see Appendix B), that the proposed project will have No Adverse Effect upon cultural resources in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, provided the conditions stipulated are adhered to. 10 A A , ; 1 I t . ,.. , 1. .A...',....,,v.t•'.;',..'` ,*)."- `.".! '...,,,,% ....:'' ..:.:.`"e ;:.- "'`IC4':'`'--7.-''',:z-,-,..:,,,:t'.i.,,,, '•-•••;,."--1.-..-•..t '7;1:'.7:"- : ••-i lk"1.' `"'''0 .1.• -`,-. ..,.L-•`-'''147'-r,.-7--,c.,•,'5, i ' -5 -• -....5,-r ' ''.,'",-4- ' , td'il 1. Ar.4„if4';','; N• ''. '' 41.1,4,;(1..'il' . '• '''''''; ,'," ,'', , , ' • ' ';'' r.,'-, '',,,' 4.=.,... ;',..' '4.:1.1.1-,',, . . -'..., ,, = ,' ' .:.,..'- .,- °.."''.:....•,^'''1?.., '."1 ' . '-'`; 4 • ... . '-4 , . ' . '' ' • • ,, ...,, • . ..,.1-...',".- 1 ..i..r...`•'-',,,". / 1 '',T".--tf•,..,4 ....;,.,':%. „......,,,• \ 4, \ . 1.•'I • 4., 1.! f•.rril li k N , . +-•• , ...., .. 4 , - n 'il; '1 „ ! '9 ..,•;:,' 4,,,,, •25'..7...A\ , ,... .. it ., ‘.,' -• . , 1 . , . . , ..., ,..( •;,1 Long Island , iz . ,. . • 1 ,-,*0•°." ..tionz 4171.41 i - •-- • ••• . , .,, . „ . , . „ ..-. • I ''' 1 :1":.:,:::":•‘.;,:,';l'''..:,' ' ':'--.. 'fr'''''.'••. .:. ' ''''1 i "- '' 4:,.... .1; ,, .. , . . ... , • , ,,,...„. . . ,..1'...'.2':••.•:' '':::','.."..,'--''10,''.,•,•-...:,.;'''...! . .:': .''--.., ' ;:-' . ...: • • ':'''- j it' f---) .f4*.. _Aofff ":0;•,,''s.''. -'. 7. "-•:•."';:-.':'..'' ,. ,-. ..' - ' ...' '..'", ', ' ' s:', ', '.'• \/ ((--11— • .%). ..,, •• 1 .,.""':..:..''', :'. '/•.-'''''',,I.,"•, '.-'.' ;',.; ,....'.!;''•'I."- :', ;' ...';i. -•' ••. ',.;.:'••', ------\ 1.1r I - 4 tv 1,....1 t1/4 , &"•,e. „I• • , , • •.•:"• : ''',. ' -..,• 3'. •-:.`....• .,:,"':,„'-,.:0-,``,`.'4% ' '0. 1.-0' '.'-,''.i"-''.:1 i•-•.'4 vvi•••••••'•9',' - '1,,,..', ''.:•!.'-.-1:4...':,,::',;;;:./Y:','/I......''',.',:.;* ..:'.i/;...--i..:,,i;45‘ '''''',''',.;•','•-',:'''-''''! ''''''''' ''''' . t ,f4w,...ir',,' `•,•'.0.:" ;7::.,,c,..,,,,t•,1.1t3..,'.,,,5:„:'-7.,:?,‘:-.4.%," ''' , i I. 1 re , 1 ) LP USA Source: SPRINT SPECTRUM,Atlas, 1996 DeLornieSearch Area: , 11 PREUDENTHAL,& ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Figure 5 - Search Area FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Based upon an inspection of the proposed public utility communications facility site and surrounding areas,analysis of the surrounding land use,zoning and environmental conditions,and an evaluation of the characteristics of the proposed Sprint Spectrum, LP communications facility, the following findings can be made: • There will be minimal impact on the environmental conditions of the area as the proposed public utility communications facility will be situated within existing structures and will not be visible from the exterior. The facility will not generate sewage or solid waste and will not require potable water. Thus, there will be no significant adverse impacts to groundwater quantity or quality. As the facility will be remotely monitored,traffic impacts will be minimal. • The use of an existing structure eliminates the need to erect a new structure (i.e., a monopole). In addition, as the antennas and associated equipment will be entirely concealed within the church,no adverse visual impacts will result. In summary, the location for the proposed installation of the Sprint Spectrum, LP public utility communications facility is one where impacts to the environment,neighborhood character and visual quality would be minimized. In fact, from a planning perspective, this location is optimal as it employs existing structures for the installation of antennas and accommodation of accessory equipment. Accordingly,the project design maintains the aesthetic integrity of the church as well as the surrounding area. • 12 } d i a , APPENDIX A 1 I Y •1 T'RELTDENTHAL 8t. ELKOWTTZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC L . . , • , _ ... `• �1., , , _. .,.� t ,:.,„..„ {i a� � .a , , ir Ark 111414.4.1,.\\.1!,,,, , 4,4a, 4 tr * rh; mil ` in I Photograph No. 1: View of south side of church on Main Road. PIPP' —Y IlEr..._ _ s. .+�'�_ ,it as r? Photograph No. 2: View of accessory building behind church. FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Yt�i ;. R , i. • Pp t� Nor ..jii • LI.L�I ` i}J1 81 ._ .z., m,,4., m —ill r-. p • E __ — ice' �' Photograph No.3: View of Orient Fire Department and Village Cemetery across Main Road to the south of the site. _` • aA, '. 4 �,,.,,:.: :iii KR \ ti ..., � p�' ty� }oR___. 4 ,( y a�_ „ , ..... , .7. 7ii '.0 r j ; ' L, I. Kr1-1'Ls,` v ti ir----' , itiAb 1R^,. ...... 44 Photograph No. 4: View looking west from the proposed project area along south side of Main Road. ___T FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. IL- , , .. ri ., W / .. , 4, \1,,: •r i \i� 'i I r !f�.,�A1 / vila ott;`,45P.V%-- --- .f.,'•; a! 1 r R. A - -.--- 111 /� � -- Pk: Photograph No. 5: Looking east of the site at adjacent residence and Oysterponds School building along the north side of Main Road. S'• .,;id,. 1 I - _ - - \ "- 41.."111 . Yt _ w w_ i T r Photograph No. 6: View of Oysterponds school athletic fields to the north side of church. ---I — r FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 7 i a i 1 f fl f l 1 APPENDIX B i f • i 4 f AI , I r I� I , �I4 14 FREUDENTII.AL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING CROUP, INC. ,V_pTioN•y11 #r#, D New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau O NEW YORK STATE Z Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 518-237-8643 Bernadette Castro Commissioner Fr, C � P, , ,, March 27,2002 i 11 ! L - r Joanne Slaman i''' ' ' Q ` Herbst Musciano 240 Cedar Knolls Rd ` -- -"', , Suite 209 t ,.". )' ' Cedar Knolls,NJ 07927 '— RE: " - ~t RE: Sprint PCS—NY33XC678 Orient Congregational Church 23045 Main Rd Orient,NY 01PR2571 Dear Ms. Slaman: Thank you for providing the State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO) with drawings illustrating your cellular collocation Orient Congregational Church in Orient,NY. We have are reviewing the project in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and relevant implementing regulations. The drawings appear to indicate that only a limited amount of historic fabric will be removed from the steeple, as was proposed in your last submission. While more detailed drawings that clearly indicate existing conditions and specified installation points are recommended to minimize the number on-site variables left to the discretion of the contractor,the SHPO believes that the project is moving in a positive direction. Based upon this review,it is the SHPO's opinion that the project will have No Adverse Effect upon cultural resources in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places,provided that the following conditions are met: 1) The contractor will ensure that removal of historic material will be kept to the minimum necessary to complete the installation. Adjacent materials will not be damaged as a result of the installation of the cellular antenna or related cables or equipment. To ensure compliance with this stipulation and to guide future restoration of the church steeple,the SHPO is requiring the following photographs: 1) General images of the church showing the building and steeple before work commences. 2) Detail images of the existing historic steeple 2) A series of"work-in-progress"photographs showing the removal of shingles and sheathing and the installation of the replacement fiberglass material and any other related equipment. 3) The historic appearance of the steeple must be preserved. To ensure compliance with this stipulation,the SHPO requests that when the installation is in place,after-work photographs are taken from the same locations where the before work(Stipulation#1) images were taken. These images should enable a before- and after-work comparison 4) All requested images will be true black and white photographs made with 35mm film(or larger format)printed in 5"X7"format on archival-quality black and white paper(not R/C paper) All images shall be clearly labeled (captioned) on the back. Two sets of images shall be prepared. An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Agency CJ panted on recycled paper One set will be given to the church for their records and to guide future restoration. The second set of photographs will be sent to the SHPO within 60 days of completion of the project. If for whatever reason these stipulations can not be met,consultation with the SHPO must continue until both parties reach an agreement. Thank you again for your assistance. If you have any questions,feel free to call me at(518)237-8643,ext.3282. Please refer to the SHPO Project Review(PR)number in any future correspondences regarding this project Sincerely, 1 WO/ Greg Donofrio Historic Sites Restoration Coordinator (greg.donofrio @ oprhp.state.ny.us) r CC: Daniel Abeyta,Federal Communications Commission(FCC) F } { APPENDIX C ' 4 1 FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. FREUENTALELKOWITZ CONSULT-NG GROU?, INC. Theresa President 568 Veterans Memorial Higbws Cnmmarls, NeTV NevTOT], 1 l725 'Feb (651} 499-2222 CURRICULUM VITAE NI: (651) 1199.5928 OF ing@1ecols THERESA ELKOWITZ OVERVIEW Theresa Elkowitz is the president of Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. (F&E), an environmental and planning consulting firm. She is well-versed in the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) process and has prepared numerous Environmental Assessment Forms (EAFs); Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements (DEIS and BEIS); planning and zoning studies, visual assessments;environmental assessments and associated evaluations. Not only has she worked with public and private clients on the administration of the SEQR,but she also serves as Chairperson of the Suffolk County Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). The CEQ is responsible for recommending SEQR determinations, holding public hearings and, administration of the environmental review process for actions proposed by the County of Suffolk. Ms.Elkowitz provides expert testimony and affidavits to various Town and Village Boards,Planning Boards and Zoning Boards of Appeals on planning, zoning and environmental matters and has provided testimony and affidavits in court cases. Ms.Elkowitz has also served as Municipal Planner and/or provided consulting planning and/or environmental services to the Incorporated Villages of Lake Success,Manorhaven,Great Neck Estates,Old Brookville,Brookville and Sands Point and the Town of Babylon and City of Glen Cove. In addition, to ensure compliance with SEQR, Ms. Elkowitz provides environmental consulting services to various school districts including,but not limited to: Cold Spring Harbor,East Quogue, Half Hollow Hills,Jericho,Lindenhurst,Three Village,Plainview-Old Bethpage,Rocky Point,East Williston, Eastport-South Manor, Westhampton Beach, Harborfields, Patchogue-Medford, Port Washington, East Moriches, Smithtown, Bay Shore, Kings Park, Commack, Oyster Bay-East Norwich,Bellmore-Merrick,Seaford and Wantagh and to various public libraries including,but not limited to: Manhasset,East Islip and Hauppauge. Prior to forming F&E, Ms. Elkowitz spent several years managing environmental projects for a consulting engineering firm. She has been involved in many diverse projects including the preparation of Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements (EISs), Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs, wetland evaluations, water use and conservation plans, municipal and private planning studies, grant applications, as well as solid waste management plans and Part 360 permit applications. 2 Before entering the field of environmental and planning consulting,Ms.Elkowitz was employed by the Town of Brookhaven Department of Housing,Community Development and Intergovernmental Affairs. She was responsible for preparing environmental assessments for community development projects in accordance with the SEQR Act and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Representative projects/documents which Ms. Elkowitz has supervised, prepared and/or had a significant preparatory role include,but are not limited to: - DEIS and related SEQR/CEQR Documentation for Kensico Water Pollution Control Program for New York City Department of Environmental Protection; - DEIS and related SEQR/CEQR Documentation for Fresh Kills Landfill for New York City Department of Sanitation; - EAFs, DEISs, Determinations of Significance and Notices for various School Districts; - DEIS for Rezoning of 147+ acre Nassau County Property for Nassau County; - DEIS and FEIS for Rezoning of 170+ acre Roosevelt Raceway for property owner; - Various Planning,Zoning,Environmental and Visual Assessments for Public Utility Communications Facilities and other Wireless Carriers; - DEIS and FEIS for development of 22+ acre commercial center in Stony Brook for private applicant; LWRP and environmental and planning tasks for Incorporated Village of Manorhaven; - DEIS and FEIS for 200+ unit Planned Retirement Community in Amityville for private applicant; - DGEIS for creation of Incentive Zoning District for the Town of Goshen; - DEIS and FEIS for 23± acre subdivision in the Village of Kings Point for private applicant,USACOE and NYSDEC wetland applications and presentations at public hearings; 3 - DEIS and F'EIS for a commercial building in Woodmere, securing of NYSDEC and USACOE wetland permits, presentations at public hearings; - Preparation of an EAF and environmental report for a proposed solid waste management recycling facility in Brookhaven; - EAF and Environmental Report for proposed 40 unit residential development for the deaf in Coram; - DEIS and FEIS for residential and commercial development in Riverhead, securing a NYSDEC Freshwater Wetland Permit; - DEIS and FEIS for waterfront condominium complex in Freeport, expert testimony on wetlands and representation of client before Freeport Planning Board,preparation of NYSDEC and USACOE Wetland Applications; - DEIS and BEIS for corporate park in Holbrook, data collection and preparation of economic analysis report for proposed corporate park; - DEIS and N'EIS for 80 unit residential condominium complex in Coram,preparation of wetland application; - FEIS for an affordable housing development in Riverhead, preparation of an Affordable Housing Corporation Grant Application; - DEIS and detailed water use and conservation study for Marriott Hotel expansion, Uniondale, expert testimony associated with SEQR process; - DEIS and BEIS for residential subdivision in Beekman/East Fishkill, expert testimony associated with SEQR process; - DEIS and N'EIS for an office condominium complex in Wantagh, expert testimony associated with SEQR process,preparation of NYSDEC freshwater wetland permit application; - DEIS and_'OIS for a shopping center in Patchogue,expert testimony associated v;?i t'-, SEQR process. 4 EXPERIENCE Principal and Corporate President. Responsible for operations of a multi-disciplined environmental and planning consulting firm. Technical tasks include the preparation of environmental impact statements; environmental assessment forms; site assessments; waterfront revitalization programs;wetland evaluations;planning studies;and various permit applications and related analyses for public and private clients. Environmental presentations and expert testimony before various municipal boards and community groups. Administrative tasks include all business operations, personnel management, budgeting, billing, marketing etc. Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc., 368 Veterans Memorial Highway, Commack,New York. August, 1988 -Present. Environmental Project Manager/Planner. Responsible for the preparation of environmental impact statements, environment assessments and planning studies for private clients and municipalities. Environmental presentations and testimony to Town Boards and Planning Boards. Preparation of various New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Nassau County Department of Health and Suffolk County Department of Health Services permit applications. Coordination of State Environmental Quality Review procedures. Site evaluations and environmental assessments for real estate developers. Administrative functions including proposal and contract preparation, budget analysis, and billing. Supervision of professional and support staff. Baldwin &Cornelius, P.C., 210 Express Street, Plainview, New York. December, 1986 -August, 1988. Neighborhood Aide/Assistant to the Housing Rehabilitation Administrator. Completion of environmental reviews for all Community Development projects in accordance with SEQR and NEPA. Preparation of grant proposals. Assisted in the first affordable housing program for the Town of Brookhaven-the Neighborhood Homes Program. Credit feasibility analyses for SONYMA mortgage applicants. Interviewing for residential rehabilitation, materials grant and townwide handicap ramp programs,evaluation of applications and subsequent loan recommendations. Monitoring and coordinating of the Materials Grant and Townwide Handicap Ramp programs,monitoring of loan repayments and analysis of project income. Solicitation of consultants and engineers for public works projects. 'Coordination of public • works projects and contract compliance with federal regulations. Preparation of budgets and recommendations for policy changes. Town of Brookhaven Department of Housing, Community Development and Intergovernmental Affairs, 3233 Route 112, Medford,New York. November, 1983 -November, 1986. Instructor. Preparation of and teaching biweekly recitations in algebra and introductory microeconomics, private tutorials, assigning and grading homework and examinations. Association for Public Policy and Management Summer Institute for Minority Students,W. Averell Harriman College for Policy Analysis and Public Management, State University of New York at Stony Brook,New York. Summer, 1983, 1984 and 1985. 5 EDUCATION M.S., Policy Analysis and Public Management; W. Averell Harriman College for Policy Analysis and Public Management. May, 1985. B.A., Liberal Arts; State University of New York at Stony Brook. May, 1985. SPECIAL PROJECTS Consultant. Responsible for the formulation, implementation and administration of the Residential Rehabilitation Program for the Incorporated Village of Lake Grove. Tasks include interviewing clients, evaluating applications, program coordination, project monitoring and payments. Fall, 1985 -1987. Graduate Workshop. Statistical analysis of usage of the Mastic-Moriches-Shirley Community Library. Recommendations to the Library's Board of Trustees regarding how to increase community patronage and involvement. Spring, 1984. MEMBERSHIPS Chairperson, Suffolk County Council on Environmental Quality Environment Committee of the Long Island Association Board of Directors, Long Island Builders Institute HONORS,AWARDS AND DESIGNATIONS Certified Environmental Specialist and Certified Environmental Inspector, Environmental Assessment Association, 1994. Magna Cum Laude Graduate, State University of New York at Stony Brook. May, 1985. Winner,Presidential Management Intern Program. Spring, 1985. Ginny Watral,MPA Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group,Inc. 368 Veterans Memorial Highway • Commack, New York 11725 Telephone: (631) 499-2222 •Facsimile: (631) 499-5928 PRESENT POSITION Mrs. Watral is Vice President of Planning with the fine of Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. (F&E). PR.•FESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mrs. Watral has comprehensive and diverse experience in overall planning and environmental evaluation associated with redevelopment of numerous parcels within various municipalities on Long Island. Specifically, this includes community development; waterfront revitalization; preparation of grant applications for commercial and residential projects; planning, zoning and visual impact assessments for public utility communication facilities; neighborhood character studies; preparation of environmental assessment forms; preparation of environmental impacts statements; and municipal planning. Additionally, Mrs. Watral prepares New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit applications. Prior to joining F&E, Mrs. Watral worked for the Long Island Housing Partnership and the City of Glen Cove. Among her responsibilities were preparation of environmental assessments for community development projects for the Town of Babylon, in accordance with the State Environmental Review Quality Act (SEQRA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and monitoring regulatory compliance of federal, state and other public and private funding sources. Mrs. Watral has provided expert testimony relative to the planning and environmental impacts of public utility communications facilities and development projects throughout Long Island. Representative projects in which Mrs. Watral has been instrumental include but are not limited to: - Preparation and submission of planning and zoning analyses and neighborhood character studies, including expert testimony, in the Incorporated Villages of Great Neck Plaza, Cedarhurst, Valley Stream, Mineola, Garden City and New Hyde Park and the Towns of Hempstead,Huntington,Brookhaven and Islip; - Environmental Assessment Forms for projects including residential land divisions, public utility communications facilities and senior citizens developments, in the Towns of Hempstead,North Hempstead, Oyster Bay,Brookhaven and Huntington; - Preparation, submission and presentation at public hearings in the Town of Babylon, of Comprehensive Annual Performance Evaluation Report for the Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnership Programs to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development; - Preparation and submission of the Five-Year Consolidated Plan, including presentations at public hearings for the Town of Babylon; and - Compilation of information for planning, zoning and visual impact assessments for over fifty public utility communications facilities. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science/Master of Public Administration, College of Management, School of Public Service, Long Island University, C. W. Post Campus, Greenvale,New York, Accelerated degree program,Magna cum Laude, September, 1998. Associate in Arts, Liberal Arts and Sciences, Suffolk County Community College, Selden, New York, With Highest Distinction,May, 1995. d ve, aIa° 03 194) o Zoning Board of Appeals: Town of Southold c," State of New York: County of Suffolk X In the Matter of the Application of SSLP Spectrum L.P. For Special Use Permit Premises: AFFIDAVIT 23045 Main Road Onent,New York Section 018; Block 02;Lot 022.001 X STATE OF YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) JAMES McCONNELL, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am a radiofrequency engineer employed by Sprint Spectrum L.P., (`SSLP"). As a radio frequency engineer,I am trained to identify service deficiencies in wireless telecommunications coverage and to evaluate the ability of proposed antenna sites to remedy such deficiencies. I am fully familiar with SSLP's antenna network in Nassau and Suffolk Counties. My curriculum vitae is submitted herewith. 2. I submit this affidavit in support of the application of SSLP for Special Use Permit. 3. SSLP is considered a public utility for zoning purposes under the laws of the State of New York and is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission("FCC")to serve the public within Suffolk County and throughout much of the United States. 4. The proposed public utility communication facility will consist of the installation of antennas inside the church steeple at the premises captioned above and the installation of related equipment in a nearby existing accessory building at the premises as depicted in the plans previously submitted to the Board. 5. SSLP strives to provide reliable service throughout its licensed coverage area. At present,there is a substantial service gap in SSLP's wireless telephone coverage in the Orient area. A service gap exists if the user of a SSLP mobile telephone cannot reliably transmit, receive, or maintain a voice or data call. 6. The service gap in coverage that now exists in the vicinity of the proposed site prevents SSLP from providing reliable service in this area. This unreliability represents an inconvenience to users of SSLP's services and can have serious consequences at times of emergency or disaster. 7. In order to understand why the antenna site that is the subject of this application is needed, it is necessary to understand how SSLP's system works from an engineering standpoint. 8. SSLP's wireless communication system is a communications system designed by strategically placing low powered base stations at determined distances apart and at predetermined heights. The frequencies used by the system are generally"line of site". Because of such factors as hills,valleys,trees,buildings, and other physical obstructions and due to the nature of radio waves, each coverage area is irregularly shaped. Therefore, the sites must have some overlap to ensure "seamless"coverage. With some overlap and sufficient signal from each base station,the SSLP user can move through the cells and not lose its call. The sites are engineered to cover a limited area,so that an antenna facility will cover the area surrounding it,but will not interfere with other sites in the system. 9. In order to eliminate the service deficiency in a particular area, we perform propagation studies to determine the height and location of the cell site needed. Based on our studies, we determined that an antenna facility would have to be established within a narrowly - 2 - defined search area in order to eliminate the service gap. In this case, we determined that the installation of the antennas inside the steeple of the Orient Congregational Church would allow SSLP to provide reliable service in much of the Orient area. By doing so, SSLP will obviate the need to build a new monopole or tower in the vicinity of the church. 10. The antennas in question must be affixed at the height described above in order to ensure that the service deficiency in question will be eliminated and that reliable service will be afforded to SSLP users. The location and height of the antennas is determined by some or all of the following factors: drive test data,the location of existing antenna sites in the area,topography in the surrounding area, land cover features in the area such as buildings and foliage, and the results provided by computer propagation software programs that enable radiofrequency engineers to predict the anticipated signal propagation at a given height and location. 11. In order to illustrate the effect that the proposed site would have on coverage in its vicinity, maps have been prepared to be submitted to the Board at the public hearing. The maps depict the areas presently enjoying reliable service in the vicinity, and the area to be served by the proposed site. 12. The proposed antenna facility is of vital importance to SSLP's efforts to provide reliable service to the area in question. Moreover,we believe that inasmuch as this antenna facility will not be visible to the public, it is clearly the least obtrusive means to eliminate the service deficiency in question. 13. The antennas proposed will not interfere with radio or television service, or public safety telecommunications in the surrounding area. - 3 - A 14. Based on all of the foregoing, the proposal represents an excellent choice; it will enable SSLP to provide reliable service in much of the Orient area and will have no negative effect on the aesthetics or character of the surrounding area. / JAMES McCONNELL Radio Frequency Engineer Sworn to before me this vo day of , 2003 rte, NOTARY P LIC LAWRENCE C. RE' Notary Public,State of New York No. 52-4793664 Qualified in Suffolk Counkb Commission Expires May 31, - 4 - Q�GSION.y�S �]do/o ; ) Pe,41) ) New York State Office of Parks, Recreation.and Historic Preservation al Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau O NEWYORKSTATE Z Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 518-237-8643 Bernadette Castro Commissioner iE 2 ti - r� March 27,2002 ; ' ' 1 Joanne Slaman ''' • Herbst Musciano 240 Cedar Knolls Rd - Suite 209 ' Cedar Knolls,NJ 07927 L--- i RE: Sprint PCS—NY33XC678 Orient Congregational Church 23045 Main Rd Orient,NY 01PR2571 Dear Ms. Slaman: Thank you for providing the State Histonc Preservation Office(SHPO) with drawings illustrating your cellular collocation Orient Congregational Church in Orient,NY. We have are reviewing the project in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and relevant implementing regulations. The drawings appear to indicate that only a limited amount of historic fabric will be removed from the steeple,as was proposed in your last submission. While more detailed drawings that clearly indicate existing conditions and specified installation points are recommended to minimize the number on-site variables left to the discretion of the contractor, the SHP J believes that the project is moving in a positive direction. Based upon this review, it is the SHPO's opinion that the project will have No Adverse Effect upon cultural resources in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places,provided that the following conditions are met: 1) The contractor will ensure that removal of historic material will be kept to the minimum necessary to complete the installation. Adjacent materials will not be damaged as a result of the installation of the cellular antenna or related cables or equipment. To ensure compliance with this stipulation and to guide future restoration of the church steeple, the SHPO is requiring the following photographs. 1) General images of the church showing the building and steeple before work commences. 2) Detail images of the existing historic steeple. 2) A series of"work-in-progress"photographs showing the removal of shingles and sheathing and the installation of the replacement fiberglass material and any other related equipment. 3) The historic appearance of the steeple must be preserved. To ensure compliance with this stipulation, the SHPO requests that when the installation is in place, after-work photographs are taken from the same locations where the before work(Stipulation#1) images were taken. These images should enable a before-and after-work comparison. 4) All requested images will be true black and white photographs made with 35mm film(or larger format) printed in 5"X7"format on archival-quality black and white paper(not R/C paper). All images shall be clearly labeled(captioned) on the back. Two sets of images shall be prepared. • An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Agency 0 printed on recycled paper One set will be given to the church for their records and to guide future restoration. The second set of photographs will be sent to the SHPO within 60 days of completion of the project. If for whatever reason these stipulations can not be met,consultation with the SHPO must continue until both parties reach an agreement. Thank you again for your assistance. If you have any questions,feel free to call me at(518)237-8643,ext.3282. Please refer to the SHPO Project Review(PR) number in any future correspondences regarding this project. Sincerely, N_ 1 Greg Donofrio Historic Sites Restoration Coordinator (greg.donofrio@oprhp.state.ny.us) CC:Daniel Abeyta,Federal Communications Commission(FCC) NY33XC678 / Orient Congregational Church Current Coverage ,:t OA% r- ,- • k /04) _ ... ,. Iiiii &j68II NY33XC678 / Orient Congregational Church Proposed Coverage illo, % , „Nt \ .or 71,11 IIIL 4) ir — T •, 4 ■ / Al linea. r)IA _ r # , / DD I lic,... _.. _ I _ tiv . ....-r. `4 i y / r Ar NY33XC678 / Orient Congregational Church Current + Proposed Coverage P e !Al\ , , I, , ' COR, KINETICS® P OR A T ION I ' 271 North Avenue,Suite 711 P.O. Box 1620, New Rochelle, N'10802-1620 Phone 914-576-6530 Fax.914-576-0576 CORPORASC WOKS® T I O N ENGINEERING REPORT SUMMARY JANUARY 2, 2003 PREPARED AND SIGNED BY LOUIS G. CORNACCHIA, B.E.E., PRESIDENT SCINETICS CORP. EVALUATION OF RADIO EMISSIONS FROM THE PROPOSED SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE ANTENNA INSTALLATION (SITE-NY33XC678B) FOR AN INTEGRATED WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, TO BE MOUNTED INSIDE AN EXISTING CHURCH STEEPLE, LOCATED AT DISTRICT 1000, SECTION 018, BLOCK 02, LOT 022.001, ORIENT CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH, 23045 MAIN ROAD, ORIENT, NEW YORK. 271 North Avenue,Suite 711 A P.O. Box 1620, New Rochelle, Nl'10802 1620 Phone: 914-576-6530 • . Fax:914-576-0576 KINETICS CORPOR ATION Ms. Roe Carey Property Specialist Sprint Telecommunications Venture Crossroads Corporate Center 1 International Boulevard Mahwah, New Jersey 07495 Subject: Evaluation of Radio Emissions from a proposed Sprint Spectrum L.P. Personal Communications Service (PCS) Antenna Installation (Site #NY33XC678B) for an Integrated Wireless Communications Network, to be mounted inside an existing church steeple, located at Orient Congregational Church, District 1000, Section 018, - Block 02, Lot 022.001, 23045 Main Road, Orient, New York. 1 Attn.: Ms. Roe Carey SUMMARY This report is the result of an extensive study of Electromagnetic Field Intensities (EMF - Power Densities) emitted by the Proposed Sprint Spectrum L.P. PCS Antenna Installation (Site #NY33XC678B) for a Integrated Wireless Communications Network, consisting of antennas, to be mounted inside an existing church steeple, located at Orient Congregational Church, District 1000, Section 018, Block 02, Lot 022.001, 23045 Main Road, Orient, New York. The study incorporated the most conservative considerations to determine practical combined worst case Power Densities, contributed by the proposed Facility. It is the conclusion of this report, that the emissions meet the safety criteria specified by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, with respect to environmental considerations of RF emissions as well as the limits recognized by New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH). B The results of this analysis indicate that the maximum level of RF energy to which the public may be exposed from the operation of the proposed Facility is below all applicable health and safety limits. Additionally, the power densities emitted by the proposed carrier installation, are far below the safety criteria adopted by the Federal Communications Commission, as mandated by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the health standards adopted or proposed in the United States and any health standard used anywhere in the world. The issue of EMF compliance is pre-empted from the municipality regulatory powers beyond the applicants stating that it has examined the emissions in accordance with "OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97- 01, August 1997" with analytical adjustments to equations per Richard Tell Associates and Ed Mantiply of the FCC Office of Engineering Technology and that the applicant is in compliance with with the FCC MPE levels of 1000 microwatts/cm. sq. "General Public- uncontrolled environment" Standard. This Standard is recognized by the NYSDOH. Section 704 of .the Telecommunications Act of 1996 states ; " No State or local government or instrumentality thereof, may regulate the placement, construction and modification of personal wireless services facilities on the basis of environmental effects of radio frequencies emissions to the extent that such Facilities comply with the Commissions (FCC) Regulations concerning such emissions". This law directs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to offer assistance to state and local governments in wireless facilities issues. On August 1, 1996 the FCC adopted portions of the 1991 ANSI/IEEE, and NCRP Maximum permitted exposure (MPE) criteria. The results of this theoretical worse case safety analysis clearly indicate that the EMF levels attributed to the emissions contributed by the proposed Sprint Spectrum transmitters, will be far below EMF continuous Exposure levels as per ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991* (49 CFR 1.1310), Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Continuous Exposure Standards, OSHA, 1986 NCRP and NYSDOH limits. The emissions broadcast from the Sprint Wireless transmitters are in the non-ionizing 1950-1965 (PCS) MHz frequency band, a band previously assigned to fixed/mobile communications since the 1950s. Presently the FCC has assigned these same frequencies in the 1900- C 2000 MHz band to the Wireless Communications Industry, capable of transmitting at power levels of 350 Watts ERP. These frequencies have in fact, been a part of the EMF environment for over fifty years. The EMF levels attributed to the emissions caused by these wireless systems are well below EMF Standards which in the scientific consensus based on overwhelming evidence, are well below threshold effects. The derived Standards have added safety limits to the threshold levels. When EMF levels encountered are at or below the Standard, no health effects occur, therefore no cumulative effect is possible regardless of exposure duration. The theoretical highest combined cumulative emissions from the proposed herein named carrier the Orient community could be exposed to at an elevation of 24 feet above ground, at any .point in the community could be 0 .79 % (contributed by the proposed Sprint PCS and existing nearby Orient Fire Department and Police Department Repeater antennas). This combined cumulative percentage of EMF levels which could be emitted, would be below 'all applicable FCC MPE EMF Standards by a factor of 125. (See Table IIA-1). Personnel. while on the Steeple Base Floor area of the existing site building, could be exposed to a theoretical maximum cumulative EMF level of 2.60% at an elevation of six (6) feet above the Steeple. Base Floor surface, contributed by the proposed Sprint Spectrum and herein named municipal transmitting antennas. Since the Steeple Base Floor area could be considered a non-restricted area, the General Public more restrictive Standards are employed in this analysis. This cumulative percentage of EMF levels which could be - emitted, would be at least 38 times below all applicable FCC MPE EMF Standards. (Note: All future co-locating carriers must complete an FCC Compliance analysis, including the Sprint L.P. emissions as determined herein, providing cumulative EMF emissions impact introduced by the future proposed carriers.) These EMF levels and all other levels presented in Table II-IIB are theoretical maximas that could occur only under worst case events, assuming' conditions such as in phase reflections occurring steady state, all transmitters operating simultaneously and continuously and excluding impedance or attenuating characteristics of construction D material used in homes, schools and other similar structures. In reality, actual field measurements continually provide readings of power density levels far lower than the more conservative analytical • levels indicated. Mobile Cellular/PCS Radio Frequency Bands do not interfere with television reception, telephones or radio reception due to the wide separation of the Broadcast Bands as mandated and monitored by the FCC. (See Table I) ANALYSIS This critical analysis* incorporated antenna emission characteristics and included the following assumptions which exceed realistic conditions of operations, but will yield worst case EMF - Power Densities ordinarily not realized and never exceeded. 1. All antennas are located at the lowest elevation indicated in the construction drawing to absorb errors in actual locations and to bring the antenna cluster closer to facilities and citizens than would normally be the case. 2. All antennas will be transmitting continuously, 24 hours a day. 3. All channels will be communicating simultaneously. 4. Power levels emitting from the antennas are increased by a factor of 4.0 to take into account possible in - phase reflections at any point in the Orient community, which is rarely the case, and if so, are never continuous. 5. At all distances greater than 2000 feet, the Power Densities decrease by a factor of four (4) with every doubling of distance. * Reference Basis for calculations: 1 . "Evaluating Compliance With FCC-Specified Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio frequency Radiation.- OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01, August 1997" with analytical adjustments to equations per Richard Tell Associates and Ed Mantiply of the FCC Office of Engineering Technology. 2. Copies of data, sketches and specifications submitted by Sprint Spectrum L.P. are the basis for our studies, calculations and analysis. E Frequency Bands - According to most authorities, microwave (MW) frequencies cover the approximate band from 900 MegaHertz (MHz) to 300 GigaHertz (GHz). One MegaHertz (MHz) is a million cycles and One GigaHertz (GHz) is a billion cycles per second. Table I lists several other communication and interrogation frequencies used in the United States. Clearly, a large fraction of commercial and private telecommunication involves MW Frequencies. TABLE I (Some Frequency Definitions) Type of System Frequency Interval FM Radio 88 MHz to 108 MHz VHF TV 174 MHz to 216 MHz UHF TV 470 MHz to 806 MHz Mobile Phone: Cellular/PCS 806 MHz to 2.0 GHz Typical Radar Systems 200 MHz to 3.0 GHz Long Distance Telephone Linkage 4 GHz to 11 Ghz The Power Densities emitted by the proposed Facility are many orders of magnitude below the Health Standards adopted or proposed in the United States and any Health Standard used anywhere in the world. The attached photograph indicating acceptable EMF emissions from various household appliances provides a further perspective for better understanding the EMF levels encountered in this summary. For additional information addressing the environmental impact of EMF Emissions please refer to the section in the report titled "References" which provides current names of agencies, contact personnel and phone numbers. F POWER DENSITY CALCULATIONS-Analytical Data The Scinetics Engineering report represents a worst case scenario, and the provided EMF analysis considers maximum number channels to be transmitted by the proposed antennas in each sector. For determining maximum public exposure to EMF emissions potential close proximity of the public to the proposed location of the applicants transmitting antennas must be defined as " near field region", or "far field". The following will examine procedures followed in accordance with FCC OET Bulletin 65-Edition 97-01, with analytical adjustments to equations per Richard Tell and Ed Mantiply of the FCC Office of Engineering Technology. FOR PROPOSED SPRINT SPECTRUM TRANSMITTING ANTENNAS: Model FEMS RR65-15-00DP1 FOR PCS: X.= 984 = 0.51 ft frequency (MHz) Frequency =1950 Mhz "Antennas"-by John D. Kraus, Mcgraw Hill 1950 Section 2 R(NF)=D2 4X, D=Height of antenna panel =2.5 feet ' R(NF)=D2 = 12.25 feet X R(FP)=2D2 = 24.50 feet X, "OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01, August 1997" (Page 30) G Church Steeple emissions: A person standing on the existing Steeple Base Floor directly below the proposed Sprint Spectrum transmitting antennas (and at a point 6 feet above the existing floor surface) would be at a distance of R=3.75 feet from bottom of antenna or R=5 feet from C/L of antenna, which falls in the Near Field region. For Sprint Spectrum Antennas- The power density in the near field region can be determined as follows: @ R=1 foot For Near Field analysis: Snf= On axis maximum power density in the near field Snf=180 Pnet = 11679 µw/cm2 i4 IIR'D Pnet =Input power to antenna =30,772,000 µw/cm2 D=antenna height = 2.50' feet R =distance from C/L to point of interest=1 foot =beamwidth= 65° degrees Under the proposed Sprint Spectrum PCS transmitting Antennas: (@ R=5 feet) Proposed Sprint: • If -off axis distance from antenna C/L is greater than height of antenna panel (RR65-18-02DPL2 =2.5 feet), then; (FCC MPE General Public Standard=1000 microwatts/cm. sq.) Snf'= 11679 µw/cmc = 2336µw/crna 5 Snf"= Snf'/20 dB = 23.36 µw/cm2 =2.34% FCC MPE 1000 "OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01, August 1997" (Page 30-Ref[15]) Existing Fire Dept.: (FCC MPE General Public Standard=300 microwatts/cm. sq.) (Sff) = 0.134 µ,w/cm2 =0.04% FCC MPE 300 Existing Police Dept.: (FCC MPE General Public Standard=100 microwatts/cm. sq.) (Sff) = 0.233 µw/cm2 =0.22% FCC MPE 100 Total Combined Cumulative Pct. FCC MPE EMF =2.60% I The Principal Features Of The Proposed Installation And The Assumptions Considered In The Analysis Are As Follows: a) The proposed Sprint Spectrum antennas will be installed in an existing church steeple, as indicated by the Sprint Spectrum, L.P. drawings: Sprint Spectrum L. P. (Proposed) Maximum ERP/Channel 200 watts ERP Number of Channels 3 Number of Transmit antennas/sector 2 Antenna centerline height above grade 62.83 & 59.83 feet Antenna Mode1EMS-RR65-15-00DPL2 OmniDirectional-Gain=12.9 dBd Frequency of transmission- 1950-1965 MHz Maximum continuous residential Exposure- 1000 microwatts/cm.sq. b) The antennas will be mounted in three sectors, two (2) directional antennas [RR65-15-00DPL2 or equivalent] in each sector for transmission and receive. The physical arrangement of these antennas is illustrated in drawings given by Sprint Spectrum L.P.. (Assumed 0° degree downtilt for all antennas in this analysis.) c) The power output from the transmitting antennas for all PCS channels will not exceed a total of 600 watts ERP (200 WERP/channel @ three (3) channels) The radio transmissions could be at frequencies between 1950 and 1965 MegaHertz. d) The coverage pattern of the transmitting antennas will be in three (3) sectors and will be assumed to transmit circularly, 360 degrees. This will provide a worst case situation, resulting in the maximum possible power density. e) It was assumed that the elevation of the Orient community within a radius of 2000 feet from the existing building is equal to the elevation at the base of the building. f) All field points are at Radial distances indicated from the base of the building where the vertical line of the transmitting antenna intersects. H Far Field When power density predictions of field points in the community are calculated Far Field equations can be used. For far field (ff) EMF analysis: Sff = n F EIRP 4tR2 Where S(ff)=power density EIRP=power output of antenna relative to an isotropic radiator =P(erp) x 1.64 (correctionfactor) R=distance from point in question to center of emissions of antenna F The ground reflectivity n=number of channels In cases where antennas incorporating directional arrays and where antennas are pointed to the horizon, the far field equation shown will result in overly worst case prediction. Therefore the equation can be modified by the antenna vertical emissions pattern where a relative gain can be derived: S= n I' EIRP FO 47CR2 Ft=Relative field factor (relative numeric gain) "OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97-01, August 1997" (Pages 21 - 23) J g) The existing carrier RF and elevation data including transmitting characteristics located at the nearby Orient Fire Department House, 23300 Main Road, Orient, New York, are as follows: Orient Fire Department (existing) Maximum ERP/Channel 30 watts ERP Number of Channels 4 Number of Transmit antennas 1 Antenna centerline height above grade 50 feet Antenna Model- L51JJB 14903M OmniDirectional-Gain= 6 dBd Frequency of transmission- 460-465 MHz Maximum continuous residential Exposure- 300 microwatts/cr.sq. Police Department (existing) Maximum ERP/Channel 50 watts ERP Number of Channels 2 Number of Transmit antennas 1 Antenna centerline height above grade 50 feet Antenna Model- PD220-4 OmniDirectional-Gain= 5.25 dBd Frequency of transmission- 155-157 MHz Maximum continuous residential Exposure- 100 microwatts/cm.sq. K TABLE IIA-1 EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.SQ./PERCENTAGE OF STANDARDS PROPOSED SPRINT INSTALLATION AT THE EXISTING ORIENT CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH,ORIENT,NEW YORK Field Point - Any point in the community-24 feet above ground Antenna System Elevation Power Standard Calculated Percent of Feet WERP FCC/NCRP EMF Density Standard Residential SPRINT SPECTRUM (6) - 1950-1965 MHz (Proposed) 59.83 200 1000 3.749 0.37 ORIENT FIRE DEPARTMENT (1) - 460-465 MHz (Existing) 50 30 300 0.229 0.08 ORIENT POLICE DEPARTMENT (1) - 155-157 MHz (Existing) 50 50 100 0.340 0.34 Total Percentage Of All Antenna Sources 0.79% NOTE: 1 . N/A is less than 0.001. 2. Unless Indicated - Total Percentage of All Antenna Sources = less than 0.01%. 3. WERP - power output per channel ** EMF emissions contributed by transmitting antennas in differing frequency bands are regulated by MPE Standards for the specific bands in which the emissions are analyzed. When adding the emissions resulting from transmissions in differing frequency bands, the resulting percentages of the emissions compared to the governing MPE standards are added. Per the FCC, percentages of EMF Density levels of applicable Standards, as specified by the FCC OET Bulletin No. 65 Edition 97.01, are addressed as follows: "Therefore, in mixed or broad band fields, where a number of different frequencies are involved, the contributing of all RF sources must be considered. When different limits are recommended for different frequencies, the fraction of (or percentages) the limit incurred within each frequency interval should be determined, and the sum of all such fractions (or percentages) should not exceed 1.0 (or 100 percent)" See section 4.1 in Appendix A). TABLE II EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.SQ. PROPOSED SPRINT SITE #NY33XC678B ORIENT CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH 23045 MAIN ROAD, ORIENT, NEW YORK , Proposed Lower than the 1996 Percentage compared to the 1996 SPRINT Telecommunications Act Telecommunications Act Field Points PCS FCC/ANSI/IEEE C95.14991 FCC/ANSI/IEEE . Combined General Public Exposure(1000 C95.1-1991 General Public Antenna micro watts/cm.sq.)by a factor ExposureStandard(1000 micro Emissions of watts/cm.sq.) AMEN Point 1 (A) 0.707 1400 0.07% R=10'- Base of site Building Elev. -6' . Point 2 (B) 3.749 250 0.37% R=100'- Site Framed House Elev. -24' Point 3 (C) 2.819 350 0.2 8% R=150'- Nearest Home Elev. -24' Point 4 (D) 1.314 750 0.13% R=400'- Oysterponds School Elev. -24' Point 5 0.840 1175 0.08% R=500'- Orient Community Elev. -16' Point 6 0.335 2975 0.03% R=1000'- Orient Community Elev. -16' Point 7 0.084 11900 0.01% R=2000'- Orient Community Elev. -16' Note: N/A =factor over 100000 or less than 0.01% TABLE IIA EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.SQ. PROPOSED SPRINT SITE #NY33XC678B ORIENT CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH ' 23045 MAIN ROAD, ORIENT, NEW YORK Existing Lower than the 1996 Percentage compared to the 1996 ORIENT F.D. Telecommunications Act Telecommunications Act _ Field Points 460 MHz FCC/ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991 FCC/ANSI/IEEE Antenna mounted to 50 foot Fire Combined General Public Exposure(300 C95.1-1991 General Public Department tower located 500 feet Antenna micro watts/cm.sq.)by a factor ExposureStandard(300 micro from Orient Cong. Church Emissions of watts/cm.sq.) Point 1 (D) 0.317 925 0.10% R=325'- Oysterponds School Elev. -24' Point (C) 0.254 1175 0.08% R=385'- Nearest Home to Site Elev. -24' Point 3 (B) 0.229 1300 0.08% R=405'- Site Framed House • Elev. -24' Point 4 (A) 0.134 2225 0.04% R=500'- Base of Church Steeple Elev. -6' Point 5 0.053 5625 0.02% R=1000'- Orient Community Elev. -16' Point 6 0.017 17850 0.01% R=2000'- Orient Community Elev. -16' ' Note: N/A=factor over 100000 or less than 0.01% TABLE IIB EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.SQ. PROPOSED SPRINT SITE #NY33XC678B ORIENT CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH 23045 MAIN ROAD, ORIENT, NEW YORK Existing Lower than the 1996 Percentage compared to the 1996 ORIENT P.D. Telecommunications Act Telecommunications Act Field Points 155 MHz FCC/ANSI/IEEE C95.14991 FCC/ANSI/IEEE Antenna mounted to 50 foot Fire Combined General Public Exposure(100 C95.1-1991 General Public Department tower located 500 feet Antenna micro watts/cm.sq.)by a factor ExposureStandard(100 micro from Orient Cong.Church Emissions of watts/cm.sq.) Point 1 (D) 0.332 300 0.33% R=325'- Oysterponds School Elev. -24' 325 0.30% R=385'- Nearest Home to Site 0.299 ° Elev. -24' Point 3 (B) 0.340 275 0.34% R=405'- Site Framed House Elev. -24' Point 4 (A) 0.223 425 0.22% R=500'- Base of Church Steeple • Elev. -6' Point 5 0.056 1775 0.06% R=1000'- Orient Community Elev. -16' Point 6 0.014 7125 0.01% R=2000'- Orient Community Elev. -16' Note: N/A =factor over 100000 or less than 0.01% L EMF STANDARDS REVIEW - The U.S. Congress adopted "The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969" (NEPA) which requires all government agencies to take into account the potential environmental impact of their actions. The agencies must consider whether their actions significantly affect the "the quality of the human environment". To implement this mandate, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted rules covering NEPA in licensing and approving facilities and operations under its jurisdiction. Rules adopted are codified in the code of Federal Regulations, Part 1, Subpart I, of the FCC Rules and Regulations. Facilities or operations specified must provide information assessing the environmental effect of their proposal. In the case of RF emissions, the environmental effect would be the relative health risk to people living or working near or at the facility in question. The FCC was required by NEPA to make a determination as to whether the facilities or operations it approves may significantly affect the human environment with regard to the emission of RF radiation. As there was no federal standard for exposure to RF radiation, the FCC chose to rely upon a recognized non-government standard. The FCC selected the "American National Standard Safety Level With Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, "300 KiloHertz (kHz) to 100 GigaHertz (GHz)" • prepared by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in 1982. The protection guides recommended by ANSI were the guidelines the FCC had identified for using in evaluating environmental significance with respect to Human Exposure to RF Radiation. The FCC adopted rules which required preparation of environmental assessment if the particular facility or operation would cause exposure of workers or the general public to levels of radio frequency radiation in excess of the ANSI protection guides. The rule was contained in 47 CFR 1.1307(d). That rule applied to facilities or operations licensed or authorized under the following parts of the Commission's Rules, 5,21 Subpart K), 25, 73, 74 (Subparts A, G, I, and L), and 80. The facilities and operations licensed or authorized under all other parts, subparts or sections of the Commissions Rules are categorically excluded from consideration. M In 1986 the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Sub-Committee SC-53, published recommended limits for occupational and public exposure (NCRP - "Biological effects and exposure criteria for radio frequency electromagnetic fields." NCRP Report No. 86, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland). Sub-Committee SC-53 independently retained Radiation Frequency Protection Guidelines (RFPGs) similar to those of the 1982 ANSI Standard but with one notable exception: two tiers appear, one for occupational exposure and one for exposure of the general public. In 1993, the EPA, aware of the FCC's Notice of Proposed Rule Making (In the matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radio Frequency Radiation, August 13, 1993, ET Docket No. 93-62), recommended adoption of the 1996 NCRP Limits as well. In 1990, Sub-Committee IV (SC-IV of C95), formed by the IEEE using rigid selection criteria for their studies and critical reviews, recommended the same two tiers but with differences in rational. ANSI soon accepted the recommendations of IEEE Sub-Committee IV and the recommendations were proposed, adopted and termed ANSI - IEEE C95.1 - 1991. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, Public Law 104-104- February 8, 1996 recommended adoption of portions of the ANSI - IEEE C95.1 - 1991/NCRP Standards, and in August of 1996, the FCC did adopt the two tier Standards to be implemented for all Applications starting September 1, 1997. N References for EMR recommended ceilings, data and comments to radiation sources, radiation hazards and available reports on studies of household appliances emitting electromagnetic radiation: Summary of International, Federal, State and Consensus Safety Criteria For Exposure to Radio Frequency Energy at Frequencies Used for PCS Communications Organization/Government Agency Exposure Power Population Density (µW/cm sq.) International -World Occupational 4,87 5 Health Organization-(EHC 137, 1993) Public 975 International -National Radiological Occupational 10,00 0 Protection Board (NRPB, 1993) Public 10,000 International -European Prestandard Occupational 4,875 (CENELEC ENV.50166-2, 1995 Public 975 Federal -Federal Communications Occupational 5,000 Commission(follows NCRP-1986) Public 1,000 Consenus Standards American National Standards Institute Occupational 5,000 (ANSI C95.1-1982) Public 5,000 ANSI & Institute of Electrical & Occupational 6,500 Electronic Engineers Public 1,300 (ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 National Council on Radiation Occupational 5,000 Protection & Measurements Public 1,000 (NCRP Report 86,1986) State Codes New Jersey (NJAC 7:28-42) Public 5,000 Massachusetts Public 1,000 (Dept. of Health, 105 CMR 122) New York State Public 1,000 Health follows NCRP-86) PERSONAL RESUME NAME: Louis G. Cornacchia - STATUS: Married, Four Children EDUCATION: Manhattan College, BEE Iona College, Computer Language Courses* Manhattanville college, Business Law Courses PRESENT: SCINETICS Corporation - President Engineering Consultants. After Market Wireless phone -- Patent Applied for- US Patent Office Charger tech Services, Inc.-President Engineering Services OTHER ACTIVITIES: School Board President - New Rochelle, New York. Finance Campaign Manager - Mayoral Campaign, New Rochelle, New York. SDA District Chairman - Boy Scouts of America, New Rochelle, New York. Chairman- Board of Directors Reliance Bank, White Plains , New York Member of Advisory Board of Patriot National Bank Stamford, Connecticut. Licensed Real Estate Broker State of New York Mr. Cornacchia has been employed in the Electronics Industry as Electronic Engineer after receiving his BEE from Manhattan College, School of Engineering. Prior to forming Collins Consultants Int'l in 1969 and subsequently Charger Tech Services Inc. in 1974, Mr. Cornacchia was employed by Hazeltine Electronics Corp. as Engineer, Designing Signal Processor and Radar Display Module for The SAGE System, Primary Early Warning System or DEW LINE, the TPS-1- GROUND BASED SEARCH RADAR SYSTEM and AWACS (A6E) Power Systems. Subsequently, Lou was employed by Loral Systems Design Team developing the AN/ALQ58 Reconnaissance System and developed (two man team) the precursor YIG TUNER - [ALR-20] Crystal Scanner covering the full 200 megahertz - 12 gigahz Frequency Range Surveillance System for interception of Enemy Navigational Fire Control and Homing Devices for purposes of Identification and Signal Jamming. Seven years after receiving his degree Mr. Cornacchia was hired as Chief Engineer by Victory Electronic to Develop the Image Intensifier or Night Vision Scopes (Using Star Light) for the Fort Dix Army Command. At Norden Systems, Mr. Cornacchia developed unique, more aggressive programs incorporating Built-In Test Equipment (BITE) to detect on- coming circuit failures of the F111D-E Avionics to increase reliability and was responsible for Air Force change of Automatic Test -- Equipment Specifications to accommodate this innovation. In 1969 Collins Consultants Int'l, LTD was formed to continue servicing Norden Systems in developing Automatic Test Programs for AIRBORNE Computers and Navigational Radar Modules. In 1974 Charger Tech Services, a New York Corporation was formed by Cornacchia (President), with Mr. Robert Harris to service additional companies in both the Nuclear and Industrial communities on an Engineering level. In 1987 SCINETICS was formed by Mr. Cornacchia (President), and application for a service mark was filed with the United States Patent Office, and granted. As of July 1990, SCINETICS Corporation assumed responsibilities for Mobile Cellular and PCS FCC EMF Compliance analysis, Intermodulation studies, RF/EMF Site studies and Site propagation analysis. A partial listing of companies SCINETICS and Charger has been contracted with, employing 30 to 50 state of the art Engineers, Technicians and Programmers, are as follows: Westinghouse Corp. Airborne Instruments Labs Grumann Corp. Verizon Wireless Miles Inc. Loral Electronics Systems ITT Perkin Elmer Corporation NYNEX New York Telephone Co. Fairchild Camera Division Shore Media Inc. Syracuse Scientific Corp. IBM Martin Marietta Allied Signal - Bendix United Technologies Corp. AT&T Wireless Mobile Radio Cellular.EMF Studies and PCS FCC EMF Compliance analysis, Intermodulation studies, RF/EMF Site studies and Site propagation analysis. including Expert Testimonies, were provided by SCINETICS for the Following Communities. Case law decisions* favoring Applicant, where SCINETICS Corp. was mentioned as providing critical written technical support data and Expert testimony in applicant's application process. (Partial Listing): Hillsborough, New Jersey Valley Cottage, New York Fair Lawn, New Jersey* New York City, New York Hastings, New York Bedminister, New Jersey Martinsville, New Jersey Little Silver, New Jersey* Hazlet, New Jersey* Readington, New Jersey* Garwood, New Jersey* I-luntington, New York Hempstead, New York * Favorable Supreme Court, Superior and Appellate Court Decisions Benefiting Wireless Carriers .. i , i. 9,000 Up TO okktF T 0p Tp RF O. rh TA, Op t tg000t'400 otts• qNT 8,000 �/c�ow STUReq cam' 7 A s�r. NCp c,� O�St".41/:14i 7,000 r 3 6,000 OvQro at s o fr SCS 5,000 --- U) z w 0 cc 4.000 I 3 O ANSI / New Jersey I Conn. Standard a 3,000, 2,600 microwatts I cm2 Mass Indefinite Code of Exposure 500 microwatts I cm2 2.000 1.000 MOe/4ERq�CSc� 30�vcoitatr CCRO�FS o,4Nt, s iCOp-4Nt'Q'p 100 - Nq r t col �A oNF 0 - — - POWER (EMR) SOURCES 1.0 microwatts I cm2 9dNE-ncs8 CORPORATION ELECT OMA G SPEC T Non-Ionizing Radiation Ionizing Radiation Frequencies ti me,„" r. � �?H. '.,:."6!'4';";:. f; Yf,f l YF4� � 41/gi �tt F•11-4z::: � � AM Radio: 535 - 1605 kHz Light CB Radio: 27 MHz Cordless Phones: 49 MHz TV Ch2-6: 54 - 88 MHz FM Radio: 88 - 108 MHz Marine Radio: 160 MHz TV Ch 7-13: 174 - 216 MHz TV UHF Ch 14-69: 470 - 800 MHz Cellular Radio, Specialized Mobile Radio, Paging: 806- 946 MHz Antitheft devices: 10-20 kHz and/or 915 MHz Microwave oven: 915 and 2450 MHz Personal Communication Services: 1800 - 2200 MHz Intrusion alarms / door openers: 10.5 GHz Power Microwave radio: 1 - 40 GHz Frequency Satellite Communications: 100 MHz - 275 GHz 103 106 109—1-4-1012-4-1-1 1018 60 Hz 1 kHz 1MHz 1GHz Frequency (Hz) immOg6 44-0) `07 / ®''�'''®c� ' ," 0, A CCa a ; Town Hall,53095 Main Road II" 1 Fax(631)765-1823 P.O.Box 1179 4:* �a®�/��� Telephone(631)765-1802 Southold,New York 11971-0959 . 1 41 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (C_1 ( _ �=/ J ' r TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ( — �' OCT 1 I )2 ii, II, 7/I I MEMORANDUM ` � 1 TO: The Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Damon Rallis, Southold Town Building Department DATE: October 11, 2002 SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR PERMIT Project: Orient Congregational Church(Sprint) Location: 23045 Main Road, Orient SCTM# 100—Section 18 -Block 2—Lot 22.1 This is to reaffirm that the Southold Town Building Department has determined that the proposed wireless communication facility,proposed at the above referenced •'N property, requires a special exception by the Southold Town Zoning Board of `Appeals,based on Article XVI, Section 100-162A.1,which states, �. "Wi'reless communication facilities on buildings shall require a special exception approval pursuant to this article." la ,..nRa • . I MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & RE ATTORNEYS AT LAW �,/ REPLY TO: 0 REPLY TO: LM 160 MIDDLE NECK ROAD 36 NORTH NEW YORK AVENUE GREAT NECK, NEW YORK 11021 HUNTINGTON, NEW YORK 11743 (516) 487-6500 (631) 425-4100 TELECOPIER "� -? f f j� ��j a ffW �� �"`� TELECOPIER (516) 487-6539 1 1' '\:777---`- " `V! !_-- $1 \', r c; —3 (631) 425-4104 October 7,2002 j ; �� m III f �,, OCT �. )2 .�I 1 �n VIA UPS Ms. Linda Kowalski Zoning Board of Appeals Administrator Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 RE: Sprint Spectrum L.P. Application to the Zoning Board of Appeals Proposed Wireless Telecommunications Facility Premises: Orient Congregational Church of Christ of Orient Orient,New York SCTM# 1000-018-02-022.001 Dear Ms.Kowalski: In compliance with the Town of Southold Board of Appeals "Reply Form" dated September 17, 2002, a copy of which is attached hereto, we enclose correspondence of Damon Peter Rallis, Building Permits Examiner, dated June 4, 2002, setting forth his determination, following review of Sprint Spectrum L.P.'s Building Permit Application for the captioned facility,that a"notice of violation" is not necessary,, Further, we enclose seven (7) copies of the certificate of occupancy for the accessory Church office building at the captioned premises. We also enclose correspondence of Orient Congregational Church dated September 25, 2002, confirming that the parsonage for the pastor and the three-bay garage and storage shed located on the north side of the property were built in approximately 1910. In addition, please be advised that a Planning Board Work Session has been scheduled to be held on October 15, 2002. We have spoken with representatives of the Planning Department and we are hoping that the Planning Board will waive Site Plan Review after reviewing our proposal at the work session. Very truly yours, MUNLEY,MEADE,NIELSEN&RE By: 1:Ctiu4ei Ce C. l`2 Lawrence C. Re LCR:db Enclosures OFFICE OF BOARD OF APPE 3 • Southold Town luau 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 -24 ---1F23- 765-1809 t -1j.3-765-1809 tel. r 765-8064 ZBA fax. REPLY FORM Dated: 7-17-o Z ws{ 5-02,4S� ( ) Your application is incomplete for the reasons noted below. ( ) It is requested that the following be forwarded as soon as possible(within about 7 days, if feasible). The advertising deadline is 22 days before the meeting date and the information is necessary for review and advertising purposes. You may forward the information by fax at 765- 9064, however, please send the original by mail. Thank you. ( ) The appeal was not filed within 60 days of the decision of the Building Inspector. (X Missing information -please see missing information checked below. Please submit all the documentation,together with information noted below. If you have any questions, please call us at 765-1809. Thank you. Information requested: ( -Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Inspector after his/her review of this • particular project map o�ectir,c c�,a_a ; , 7"-X a-f Q Che � ocQP ,r ( ) ck payab a to the Town of Southold totaling $ ( ) Signature and notary public information are needed. O = ------ - • _---•ywere norincluded. .) ( ) Setbacks must be shown for the subject building to all property lines, with preparer's name. ( ) Six(6)sets of a diagram showing the doors, number of stories, and average height (from natural grade). • ( ) Ownership Search back to April 23, 1957 for the subject parcel and all adjoining parcels, certified by a title insurance company, and insuring the Town for$25,000. ( ) Copies of all current deeds and tax bills of the parcels back to (s7f. Other: J L' +� f� ux)74 Jr.ru,-, 0.� ..; f/ f -a- � J r tw,.,�,�) , a-�-l �j , mac-. -«c.e ,fit s f i. / . 1 f Orient Congregational Church 25 September 2002 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Ms. Linda Kowalski, Secretary to the Town ZBA 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 RE: Letter of Undertaking Sprint Spectrum, L.P. ZBA Application Orient Congregational Church, United Church of Christ of Orient,New York Section 018, Block 02, Lot 022.001 Dear Ms. Kowalski: This letter is furnished concerning the above referenced matter and questions I understand you may have regarding certain pre-existing buildings located on the property. In addition to the Church itself and a one-story building, for which we are in the process of obtaining a CO, there are two pre-existing structures dating from approximately 1910. The first is a 2-%2 story, one-family dwelling located on the southeast side of the property. This building serves as the parsonage for the Congregational Pastor. The second is a three-bay, garage and storage shed located on the northside of the property. Please feel free to contact me if you have any additional questions with respect to this matter. Sincerely, --zi QQ__,s1 Otn,....„..cic ,c___ :_-_,—.. - Donald E. Van Cleef Moderator ' (For The Orient Congregational Church) , FORM NO. 4 - TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold,_ N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NO: Z-28889 Date: 09/26(02 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ACCESSORY Location of Property: 23045 MAIN RD ORIENT (HOUSE NO.) (STREET) (HAMLET) County Tax Map No. 473889 Section 18 Block 2 Lot 22.1 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot NO. conformssubstantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated MAY 16, 2002 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 28399-Z dated MAY 16, 2002 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is Issued is ACCESSORY CHURCH OFFICE BUILDING IN REQUIRED REAR YARD AS APPLIED FOR. The certificate i.s. i.ssued to ORIENT CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COMITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. PENDING 09/03/02 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED 08/3102 RBT.VANETTEN. PLUMBING i 11 Aikmir d Authorized Sis;t tore Or Rev. 1/81 OFFICE OF t► BOARD OF APPEIL Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 74\--iF23- .,.�. 9a,e 765-1809 tel. 7654064 ZBA fax. ********** ********,***,* ,**.***A*** , * , *********,* , , , ki, ***** A REPLY FORM Dated: ��7---() Se- ) 3 2 SL TO: G,( )9164t11.7 0 1.._d_? ( ) Your application is incomplete for the reasons noted below. ( ) It is requested that the following be forwarded as soon as possible(within about 7 days, if feasible). The advertising deadline is 22 days before the meeting date and the information is necessary for review and advertising purposes. You may forward the information by fax at 765- 9064, however, please send the original by mail. Thank you. ( ) The appeal was not filed within 60 days of the decision of the Building Inspector. (4 Missing information-please see missing information checked below. Please submit all the documentation, together with information noted below. If you have any questions, please call us at 765-1809. Thank you. Information requested: (f-Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Inspector after his/her review of this • particular project maps o ie mat a i6e_ �r ✓,.2a a �7 ( ))=;;;;11 to the Town of Southold totaling $ ( ) Signature and notary public information are needed. 6'' • • --were norincluded. .) ( ) Setbacks must be shown for the subject building to all property lines,with preparer's name. ( ) Six(6) sets of a diagram showing the doors, number of stories, and average height (from natural grade). ( ) Ownership Search back to April 23, 1957 for the subject parcel and all adjoining parcels, certified by a title insurance company, and insuring the Town for$25,000. ( ) Copies of all current deeds and tax bills of the parcels back to ("- Other: t„c � cu cG� �{rwr.� P p a f�J• � r baa+k�.�) , _� , -e-7'c-- mu jic/trivai\ :Fiv,t)qc 1(e, ,. _ , - Boger, Jessica From: Anne Hopkins [a.s.hopkins@worldnet.att.net] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:11 AM To: Jessica Boger; Don Van Cleef ' Subject: Sprint Antenna Ms. Boger: Here is my message for Ms. Tortora and members of the ZBA February 20, 2003 To: Ms. Lydia Tortora and Members of the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals cc. Donald Van Cleef, moderator,Orient Congregational Church From: Anne Hopkins, 380 Platt Road/POBox 82, Orient, NY 11957 (631 323-2527) Re: Proposed Cellular Antenna in the Orient Congregational Church steeple Since I am unable to attend this afternoon's hearing due to illness, this message is to express my support for a cellular antenna to be housed inside the steeple of the Orient Congregational Church. I urge the Zoning Board of Appeals to grant the necessary variance to permit this new use of the church property. Several years ago, as an officer of the Orient Association, I vigorously opposed the planned erection of a cellular tower on farm property in Orient and helped the town Code Committee create regulations for cellular towers and antennas. I believe the proposed antenna inside the church steeple is entirely appropriate because, unlike the earlier proposal,it will not be visible. Although the church building is part of the Orient Historic District the steeple itself dates only from the mid-20th century and its appearance will not be altered by the reconstruction necessary to accomodate the antenna. I 1 \ \•)\9 >' 264 Boger, Jessica From: Anne Hopkins [a.s.hopkins@worldnet.att.net] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:11 AM To: Jessica Boger, Don Van Cleef ' Subject: Sprint Antenna Ms. Boger: Here is my message for Ms. Tortora and members of the ZBA February 20, 2003 To: Ms. Lydia Tortora and Members of the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals cc. Donald Van Cleef, moderator,Orient Congregational Church From: Anne Hopkins, 380 Platt Road/POBox 82, Orient, NY 11957 (631 323-2527) Re: Proposed Cellular Antenna in the Orient Congregational Church steeple Since I am unable to attend this afternoon's hearing due to illness, this message is to express my support for a cellular antenna to be housed inside the steeple of the Orient Congregational Church. I urge the Zoning Board of Appeals to grant the necessary variance to permit this new use of the church property. Several years ago, as an officer of the Orient Association, I vigorously opposed the planned erection of a cellular tower on farm property in Orient and helped the town Code Committee create regulations for cellular towers and antennas. I believe the proposed antenna inside the church steeple is entirely appropriate because, unlike the earlier proposal,it will not be visible. Although the church building is part of the Orient Historic District the steeple itself dates only from the mid-20th century and its appearance will not be altered by the reconstruction necessary to accomodate the antenna. 1 Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 'k 'k * RECEIPT * * * Date: 09/18/02 Receipt#: 5759947 Transaction(s): Subtotal 1 Application Fees $400.00 Check#: 5759947 Total Paid: $400.00 Name: Sprint, Spectrum L. P. 4900 Main St Kansas City, MO 64112 Clerk ID: LYNDAB Internal ID:62595 -c 9/(O/b (1 MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & RE ATTORNEYS AT LAW REPLY To: 0 REPLY TO: 160 MIDDLE NECK ROAD 36 NORTH NEW YORK AVENUE GREAT NECK, NEW YORK 11021 HUNTINGTON, NEW YORK 11743 (516) 487-6500 (631) 425-4100 TELECOPIER TELECOPIER (516) 487-6539 (631) 425-4104 VIA HAND September 10,2002 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 Re: Application for Special Exception For Sprint Spectrum L.P. Premises: Orient Congregational Church 23045 Main Road, Orient,NY 11957 Tax Map No. 1000 Section 18,Block 2,Lot 22.1 Ladies/Gentlemen: On behalf of our client, Sprint Spectrum L.P., we submit the captioned application as follows: Filing fee check in the sum of$400.00 made payable to the Town of Southold together with one (1) original and six(6) copies of each of the following: 1. Application for Special Exception; 2. ZBA Questionnaire; 3. Site Location Alternative Analysis; 4. Affidavit in Good Faith Effort; 5. Letter of Authorization For Zoning And Testing Purposes; 6. Owner's Authorization; 7. Short Environmental Assessment Form; 8. Lease Agreement; 9. Radiofrequency Engineer Affidavit; 10. Existing and Proposed Site Map; 11. Search Ring Map;3/3 •/�•o Z 12. List of Names; 13. Construction Drawings; 14. Last Deed of Record; and 15. Certificate of Occupancy - the Town of Southold Assessors Records indicate that dwelling was built prior to zoning regulations. Should you have questions or comments to the foregoing,please direct them to the undersigned. Very truly yours, MUNLEY,MEADE,NIELSEN/� n &RE By: ..L:G%�:t��LeMCPi li. /`2 Lawrence C. Re LCR/lr Enclosures NY33XC678 - Orient Search Area '25 `. .:. 0 VillilIPV V J y cX25'-..,* f; •f I 8 8 fe. ' -'n Tr•li 41 1441411111111k i 1..4 ..S. Long Island 10,1111411.7co ,itv / 'C\- -.-\ Q 0 'IA .)11111111 0 mi 0.2 0.4 0.6 Copyright©1988-2000 Microsoft Corp.and/or its suppliers.All rights reserved. http://www.microsoft.com/Streets ©Copyright 1999 by Geographic Data Technology,Inc.All rights reserved.©1999 Navigation Technologies.All rights reserved.This data includes information taken with permission from Canadian authorities©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Page ©Copyright 1999 by Compusearch Micrornarketing Data and Systems Ltd. AAMER SOOMRO AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW JERSEY) ) SS.: COUNTY OF BERGEN ) AAMER SOOMRO being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am a Radiofrequency Engineer employed by Sprint Spectrum L.P., One International Boulevard,Mahwah,New Jersey 07495 ('Sprint' hereafter). 2. I submit this affidavit in support of the application of Sprint for a special exception permit to establish a personal wireless service facility('PWSF'hereafter)in Southold at the Orient Congregational Church, 23045 Main Road, Orient; Suffolk County Tax Map No. District 1000, Section 18,Block 2,Lot 22.1. Sprint proposes to install wireless telecommunication antennas in the existing church steeple and install related equipment cabinets in the existing church building,all as described on plans submitted with the instant Application. 3. In conformance with Town of Southold requirements,I hereby certify that I prepared the four (4) maps submitted as part of the instant Application, indicating Sprint's Search Area, Proposed and Existing Sites in the Town of Southold and the Coverage Area of the proposed site. 4. In addition,I hereby certify that the proposed PWSF complies with FCC Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radio Frequency Radiation, as described in the Analysis prepared by Lucent Technologies,Wireless &Optical Technologies Safety Department, Bell Labs, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". The aforementioned Analysis states that the proposal will meet the applicable FCC standards for radiofrequency emissions. The information contained in the above-noted Analysis has been prepared by your deponent and the following authorized representative of the Applicants: Paul Testagrossa, RF Engineer Lucent Technologies Wireless & Optical Technologies Safety Department Bell Labs 600 Mountain Avenue Murray Hill,NJ 07974-0636 • • I R SOOMRO Sworn to before me this / day of %vj VL". , 2002 / .- C/1/7 �. NOTARY PUBLIC - 2 - • .;J Bell Labs Lucent Technologies Innovations for Lucent Technologies An Analysis of the Radiofrequency Environment in the Vicinity of a Proposed Personal Communications Services Base Station Site NY33XC678: Orient Congregational Church 23045 Main Road, Orient, Suffolk County, New York Prepared by the Wireless & Optical Technologies Safety Department Bell Laboratories Murray Hill,New Jersey 07974-0636 Prepared for Mike Hughes Sprint Spectrum L.P. Crossroads Corporate Center 1 International Boulevard Mahwah,New Jersey 07495 September 6, 2002 6k,61^1- /,4 ' rCS Site NY33XC678: Orient,NY-2 Table of Contents Summary 3 1. Introduction 4 2. Technical Data 4 3. Environmental Levels of RF Energy 4 4. Comparison of Environmental Levels with RF Standards 5 5.Discussion of Safety Criteria 5 6.For Further Information 7 7. Conclusion 7 8. References 9 • -i'CS Site NY33XC678: Orient,NY-3 An Analysis of the Radiofrequency Environment in the Vicinity of a Proposed Personal Communications Services Base Station Site NY33XC678: Orient Congregational Church 23045 Main Road, Orient, Suffolk County,New York Summary This report is an analysis of the radiofrequency (RF) environment surrounding the Sprint Spectrum personal communications services(PCS)base-station antennas proposed for installation in Orient, Suffolk County, NY. The analysis utilizes engineering data provided by Sprint together with well-established analytical techniques for calculating the RF fields associated with PCS transmitting antennas. Worst-case assumptions were used to ensure safe-side estimates, i.e., the actual values will be significantly lower than the corresponding analytical values. The results of this analysis indicate that the maximum level of RF energy to which the public may be exposed is below all applicable health and safety limits. Specifically, in all normally accessible areas surrounding the installation, the maximum level of RF energy associated with simultaneous and continuous operation of all proposed transmitters will be less than 0.3% of the safety criteria adopted by the Federal Communications Commission as mandated by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 is the applicable Federal law with respect to consideration of environmental effects of RF emissions in the siting of personal wireless facilities. The maximum level of RF energy will also be less than 0.3% of the exposure limits of ANSI, IEEE,NCRP, the limits used by the State of New York Department of Health and the limits used by all states that regulate RF exposure. PCS Site NY33XC678: Orient,NY-4 1. Introduction This report was prepared in response to a request from Sprint Spectrum for an analysis of the radiofrequency(RF) environment associated with the proposed personal communications services (PCS) facility, and an opinion regarding the concern for public health associated with long-term exposure in this environment. The Telecommunications Act of 1996[1] is the applicable Federal law with respect to consideration of environmental effects of RF emissions in the siting of wireless facilities. With respect to personal communication services, e.g., PCS, Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 states the following: "No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission's regulations concerning such emissions." Therefore, the purpose of this report is to ensure that the RF environment associated with this facility complies with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) guidelines as required by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which is also the same as the safety criteria used by the State of New York Depaitinent of Health(NYS DOH). 2. Technical Data The proposed PCS antennas are to be mounted within the steeple of the Orient Congregational Church located at 23045 Main Road in Orient, Suffolk County, NY. The PCS antennas transmit at frequencies between 1930 and 1990 million hertz(MHz). The actual RF power propagated from PCS antennas is usually less than 20 watts per transmitter (channel) and the actual total RF power is usually less than 200 watts per sector (assuming the maximum number of transmitters are installed and operate simultaneously and continuously). This is an extremely low power system when compared with other familiar radio systems, such as AM, FM, and television broadcast, which operate upwards of 50,000 watts. The attached figure, which depicts the electromagnetic spectrum, lists familiar uses of RF energy. Table 1 lists engineering specifications for the proposed system. 3. Environmental Levels of RF Energy The antennas used for PCS propagate most of the RF energy in a relatively narrow beam (in the vertical plane) directed toward the horizon. The small amount of energy that is directed along radials below the horizon results in a RF environment directly under the antennas that is not remarkably different from the environment at points more distant. The methodology used to calculate the exposure levels follows that outlined by the FCC in their OET Bulletin No. 651. For the case at hand, the maximal potential exposure levels associated with simultaneous and continuous operation of Sprint's transmitters can be readily calculated at any point in a plane at any height above grade. Based on the information shown in Table 1, the maximum power density associated with these antennas, at any point in a horizontal plane 6 ft and 16 ft above grade, will be less than the values shown in Table 2. The latter would be 1.OET Bulletin 65,Edition 97-01,August 1997. Federal Communications Commission,Office of Engineering and Technology, Washington,DC rCS Site NY33XC678: Orient,NY-5 representative of the maximum power density immediately outside the upper floor of nearby private homes (assuming level terrain). These levels are also shown in Table 2 expressed as a percentage of the FCC's maximum permissible exposure (MPE) values found in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (specifically, in the FCC Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation [2]). The values shown in Table 2 are the theoretical maxima that could occur and are not typical values. For example, the calculations include the effect of 100% field reinforcement from in- phase reflections and the assumption that each transmitter operates continuously at maximum power. Because of variability in the number of calls being handled, the average power of the PCS system will be less than maximum and, hence, the time-weighted power densities will be lower than the values shown in Table 2. Experience has shown that the analytical technique used is extremely conservative. That is, actual (measured) power density levels have always been found to be smaller than the corresponding calculated levels even when extrapolated to maximum use conditions (all transmitters operating simultaneously) [3]. Also, levels inside nearby homes and buildings, particularly this building, will be lower than those immediately outside because of the high attenuation of common building materials at these frequencies and, hence, will not be significantly different from typical ambient levels. 4. Comparison of Environmental Levels with RF Safety Criteria Table 2 shows the calculated maximal RF power density levels in the vicinity of the proposed installation; Table 3 shows federal, state and consensus exposure limits for human exposure to RF energy at the frequencies of interest. The FCC MPE limits for PCS range from 1000 millionths of a watt per centimeter squared (1000 µW/cm2 - public exposure) to 5000 µW/cm2 (occupational exposure). With respect to FCC limits for public exposure, comparisons of the analytical results indicate that the maximal level associated with the proposed antennas will be at least 333 times below the MPE, i.e., 0.3% of the MPE. 5. Discussion of Safety Criteria Publicity given to speculation about possible associations between health effects and exposure to magnetic fields from electric-power distribution lines, electric shavers and from the use of hand- held cellular telephones has heightened concern among some members of the public about the possibility that health effects may be associated with any exposure to electromagnetic energy. Many people feel uneasy about new or unfamiliar technology and often want absolute proof that something is safe. Such absolute guarantees are not possible since it is virtually impossible to prove that something does not exist. However, sound judgments can be made as to the safety of a physical agent based on the weight of the pertinent scientific evidence. This is exactly how safety guidelines are developed. The overwhelming weight of scientific evidence unequivocally indicates that biological effects associated with exposure to RF energy are threshold effects, i.e., unless the exposure level is sufficiently high the effect will not occur regardless of exposure duration. (Unlike ionizing radiation, e.g., X-rays and nuclear radiation, repeated exposures to low level RF radiation, or nonionizing radiation, are not cumulative.) Thus, it is relatively straightforward to derive safety limits. By adding safety factors to the threshold level for which the most sensitive effect occurs, conservative exposure guidelines have been developed to ensure safety. At present, there are more than 10,000 reports in the scientific literature that address the subject of RF bioeffects. These reports, most of which describe the results of epidemiology studies, animal and cell-culture studies, have been critically reviewed by leading researchers in the field and all new studies are continuously being reviewed by various groups and organizations whose ' ['CS Site NY33XC678: Orient,NY-6 interest is developing health standards. These include the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, the standards committees sponsored by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,the International Radiation Protection Association under the sponsorship of the World Health Organization, and the National Radiological Protection Board of the UK. All of these groups have recently either reaffirmed existing health standards, developed and adopted new health standards, or proposed health standards for exposure to RF energy. For example, in 1986, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) published recommended limits for occupational and public exposure[4]. These recommendations were based on the results of an extensive critical review of the scientific literature by a committee of the leading researchers in the field of bioelectromagnetics. The literature selected included many controversial studies reporting effects at low levels. The results of all studies were weighed, analyzed and a consensus obtained establishing a conservative threshold upon which safety guidelines should be based. This threshold corresponds to the level at which the most sensitive,reproducible effects that could be related to human health were reported in the scientific literature. Safety factors were incorporated to ensure that the resulting guidelines would be at least ten to fifty times lower than the established threshold, even under worst-case exposure conditions. The NCRP recommendations for both continuous occupational and public exposure to RF energy at the frequencies of interest are shown in Table 3. Although the State of New York does not have a regulatory program for the RF portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, the NYS DOH compares potential exposure levels with the recommendations of the NCRP to assess public safety. (Table 3 also includes a summary of the corresponding safety criteria recommended by various organizations throughout the world.) In July of 1986, the Environmental Protection Agency published a notice in the Federal Register, calling for public comment on recommended guidance for exposure of the public[5]. Three different limits, ranging from approximately 500 to 5000 µW/cm2 at PCS frequencies, were proposed. In 1987 the EPA abandoned its efforts and failed to adopt official federal exposure guidelines. However, 1993 and 1996 the EPA, in its comments on the FCC's Notice of Proposed Rule Making to adopt safety guidelines[6],recommended adoption of the 1986 NCRP limits[4]. In September 1991, the RF safety standard developed by Subcommittee 4 of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Standards Coordinating Committee SCC-28 was approved by the IEEE Standards Board[7]. (Until 1988 IEEE SCC-28 was known as the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) C95 Committee—established in 1959). In November 1992, the ANSI Board of Standards Review approved the IEEE standard for use as an American National Standard. The limits of this standard are essentially identical to the 1982 ANSI RFPGs[8] for occupational exposure and are one-fifth of these values for exposure of the general public (uncontrolled environments). Like those of the NCRP, these limits resulted from an extensive critical review of the scientific literature by a large committee of preeminently qualified scientists, most of whom were from academia and from research laboratories of federal public health agencies. The panels of scientists representing the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP)2 [9] and the National Radiological Protection Board in the United Kingdom[101 independently developed and in 1993 published guidelines similar to those of ANSI/IEEE. In 1997, after another critical review of the latest scientific evidence, ICNIRP reaffirmed the RF limits published in 1993[11]. Also, what was formerly the USSR, which 2.ICNIRP is recognized by the World Health Organization as an appropriate organization for developing guidelines to protect against non-Ionizing radiation. - PCS Site NY33XC678: Orient,NY-7 traditionally had the lowest exposure guides, twice has revised upward its limits for public exposure. Thus, there is a converging consensus of the world's scientific community as to what constitutes safe levels of exposure. Finally, in implementing the National Environmental Policy Act regarding potentially hazardous RF radiation from radio services regulated by the FCC, the Commission's Rules require that licensees filing applications after January 1, 19973 ensure that their facilities comply with the 1996 FCC MPE limits outlined in 47 CFR §1.1310[2]4 (which are the same as the 1986 NCRP limits and the NYS DOH limits at PCS frequencies). (Under the terms of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, no local government may regulate the placement of wireless facilities based on RF emissions to the extent that these emissions comply with the FCC regulations [1].) With respect to the proposed PCS antennas, be assured that the actual exposure levels in the vicinity of the Orient, NY installation will be below any health standard used anywhere in the world and literally thousands of times below any level reported to be associated with any verifiable functional change in humans or laboratory animals. This holds true even when all transmitters operate simultaneously and continuously at their highest power. Power density levels of this magnitude are not even a subject of speculation with regard to an association with adverse health effects. 6. For Further Information Anyone interested can obtain additional information about the environmental impact of PCS communications from: Dr. Robert Cleveland,Jr. Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology 445— 12th Street SW Washington,DC 20554 (202)418-2422 and William J. Condon, CHP Chief,Bureau of Environmental Radiation Protection State of New York,Department of Health 2 University Place Albany,NY 12203 (518)458-6495 7. Conclusion This report is an analysis of the RF environment surrounding Sprint's PCS base-station antennas proposed for installation in Orient, Suffolk County, NY. The analysis utilizes engineering data provided by Sprint together with well-established analytical techniques for calculating the RF 3.The FCC extended the transition period to October 15, 1997 Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket 93-62, FCC 97-303, adopted August 25, 1997. Prior to this date, the FCC required PCS licensees to comply with the 1992 ANSI/IEEE C95.1 limits and all other licensees(since 1987)to comply with the 1982 ANSI C95.1 limits. 4.Although all FCC licensees will be required to comply with 47 CFR§1.1310 limits,the FCC will continue to exclude certain land mobile services from proving compliance with these limits 47 CFR§1.1307. In the past,although licensees had to comply with the 1982 ANSI C95.1 limits,the FCC categorically excluded land mobile services,including paging,cellular,SMR and two-way radio, from hazard analyses because "individually or cumulatively they do not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment"[12] The FCC pointed out that there was no evidence of excessive exposure to RF radiation during routine normal operation of these radio services. . _-,4t'CS Site NY33XC678: Orient,NY-8 fields associated with PCS transmitting antennas. Worst-case assumptions were used to ensure safe-side estimates, i.e., the actual values will be significantly lower than the corresponding analytical values. The results of this analysis indicate that the maximum level of RF energy to which the public may be exposed is below all applicable health and safety limits. Specifically, in all normally accessible areas surrounding the installation, the maximum level of RF energy associated with simultaneous and continuous operation of all proposed transmitters will be less than 0.3% of the safety criteria adopted by the FCC as mandated by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 is the applicable Federal law with respect to consideration of environmental effects of RF emissions in the siting of personal wireless facilities. The maximum level of RF energy will also be less than 0.3% of the exposure limits of ANSI, IEEE, NCRP, the limits used by the NYS DOH and the limits used by all states that regulate RF exposure. Enclosure: Figure. Electromagnetic Spectrum r , ' 'PCS Site NY33XC678: Orient,NY-9 8. References [1] Telecommunications Act of 1996,Pub.L.No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). [2] Federal Communication Commission 47 CFR Parts 1, 2, 15, 24 and 97. "Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation"(August 6, 1996) [3] Petersen, R.C., and Testagrossa, P.A., "Radiofrequency Fields Associated with Cellular- Radio Cell-Site Antennas,"Bioelectromagnetics,Vol. 13,No. 6. (1992) [4] Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, NCRP Report No. 86, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda,MD. (1986) [5] Federal Register,Vol. 51,No. 146,Wednesday, July 30, 1986. [6] Notice of Proposed Rule Making In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, August 13, 1993. ET Docket No. 93-62. (1993) [7] ANSI/IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,Piscataway,NJ. (1992) [8] American National Standard Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 300 kHz to 100 GHz, ANSI C95.1-1982, American National Standards Institute,New York,NY. (1982) [9] Electromagnetic Fields (300 Hz to 300 GHz), Environmental Health Criteria 137, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. (1993) [10] Board Statement on Restrictions on Human Exposure to Static and Time Varying Electromagnetic Fields and Radiation, Documents of the NRPB, Vol. 4, No. 5, National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton,Didcot, Oxon,United Kingdom. (1993) [11] "Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields (up to 300 GHz) - ICNIRP Guidelines," Health Physics, Vol. 74, No.4,pp 494-522. (1998) [12] Action by the Commission February 12, 1987, by Second Report and Order(FCC 87-63), and Third Notice of Proposed Rulemaking(FCC 87-64). General Docket No. 79-144. t PCS Site NY33XC678: Orient,NY- 10 Table 1 Engineering Specifications for the Proposed PCS System,Orient,Suffolk County,NY Site Specifications Sprint maximum ERP per channel t 278 watts ___actual-radiated powerper channel 16 watts actual total radiated power per sector 48 watts number of transmit(Tx)antennas 1 per sector number of receive Rx antennas N/A number of Tx/Rx antennas(duplexed)_ 1 per sector _ --- maximum maximum number of transmitters 3 per sector ___ number of sectors configured 3 antenna centerline height above grade 59.8 ft and 62.8 ft$ antenna manufacturer EMS Wireless model number RR65-15-00DPL2 gain _ _�_ 16.55 dBi type _directional downtilt 0° t Effective Radiated Power -ERP is a measure of how well an antenna concentrates RF energy;it is not the actual power radiated from the antenna. To illustrate the difference,compare the brightness of an ordinary 100 watt light bulb with that from a 100 watt spot- light. Even though both are 100 watts,the spot-light appears brighter because it concentrates the light in one direction. In this direction,the spot-light effectively appears to be emitting more than 100 watts. In other directions,there is almost no light emitted by the spot-light and it effectively appears to be much less than 100 watts. $There are two panel antennas per sector,stacked vertically within the church steeple at the heights listed. Table 2 Calculated Maximal Levels and the Levels as a Percentage of 1996 FCC MPEs*for the Proposed PCS Antennas,Orient,Suffolk County,NY Location Power Density(µW/cm2) %of MPEs* anywhere,6 ft above mean grade level _ < 1.686 _` _ - 0.169% _ anywhere, 16 ft above mean grade level <2.543 0.254% * MPE: The FCC limits for maximum permissible exposure(same as 1986 NCRP limits at the frequencies of interest) —`i'CS Site NY33XC678: Orient,NY- 11 Table 3 Summary of International,Federal,State and Consensus Safety Criteria for Exposure to Radiofrequency Energy at Frequencies Used for PCS Systems Organization/Government Agency Exposure Power Density Population (µW/cm2) International Safety Criteria/Recommendations International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection(1997) Occupational _ 4875 Health Physics,Vol.74,No.4,pp 494-522. (1998)' Public 975 National Radiological Protection Board(NRPB, 1993) _ Occupational 10,000 (United Kingdom) Public 10,000 Federal Requirements Federal Communications Commission(47 CFR§1.1310) _ Occupational 5000 Public 1000 Consensus Standards and Recommendations American National Standards Institute(ANSI C95.1 - 1982) _ Occupational 5000 Public 5000 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers __Occupational 6500 (IEEE Standard C95.1-1999 Edition)2 Public 1300 National Council on Radiation Protection&Measurements Occupational 5000 (NCRP Report 86, 1986) Public 1000 State Codes New Jersey(NJAC 7:28-42) Public 5000 Massachusetts(Department of Health 105 CMR 122) Public 1000 New York State3 Public 1000 NOTES: 1. Reaffirmed in 1997 and published,with modification in 1998 2. Incorporating IEEE Standard C95.1-1991 and IEEE Standard C95.1a-1998 3. State of New York Department of Health follows NCRP Report 86. ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM Non-Ionizing Radiation Ionizing Radiation OPRIPAPAI i^mf'�' ,'7t '�'"°�1.'`r b7' '�d'Y "'>'�+uY�A�.r7 ;rre 2� a'�!'-`.7✓tV.?! ,y d c�Y+,.� l��.✓.CF ';.F . �,�;. �a-; a,v�`�, r;?;��g",.:i.�,:.! "1:'C"0t-i� •�'.-1�1r 'e'.a, r � .�' �,.m�5,'���„ ,i7jj+J`'!L+��'at�^M,�r�*. i a ,�'� �q�5'��i d '�•i{F+{� ,� � ..� 4f �•`v' ��t�.?�,r'. ;,�`r,f�k`� t�i�t ���f alr'��`G�w�s: 3n, iMMTrte"..,,��s. ���;+..�- fir, 'Radio•},F 3 .�;ry4{,� ���;�'�� r ?� � � � �' � k� �,� ��s���;;`-�r �� ,, �,'.� � ,,}r.7�� �� � � �! � eq enciesr , �,� �� ��Y����.: �.; . = � ' r ., ''>='�L, �:��;�"> ray, ��:, a�� �x'�A Y1 !'La a t1 f )* { fir.e ds <,.l r, C gp t�`3 S 1 s: !1. . y , , rr.E="' r 1�.Ra�'. t �,a �n�l' .r.,R�.+ s! , ,�'Y 1'L;r'1.G�Y.+S�,a +h�,it�a,�4M. i.m � v.�a"t�'ab�'�^&/A'tfS.sy)BL�; � d �th'4�.. :�,� 1..t. £� ..n�R� � "'� ,� �;..� v�'!^� f"''��.-A { �.r 4 cri- M1'}��,�.'W��.,.� n,'ia`.R � i�i k 17." t4a�`:•�d� 5143�.:5h�f� r..�z�„k,e,m 4:kd?i'#c•:vF+`'L,va�ik`d�-`>.!r AM Radio: 535- 1605 kHz Light CB Radio: 27 MHz r :1 41 Cordless Phones: 49 MHz = TV Ch 2-6: - 14, S•1 +i . , 54 88 MHz FM Radio: 88- 108 MHz . ; Marine Radio: 160 MHz ;!;-4,40 TVCh7-13: 174 -216 MHz TV UHF Ch 14-69: 470- 800 MHz Cellular Radio, Specialized Mobile Radio, Paging: 806- 946 MHz Antitheft devices: 10-20 kHz and/or 915 MHz Microwave oven: 915 and 2450 MHz Personal Communication Services: 1800 -2200 MHz Intrusion alarms/ door openers: 10.5 GHz Power Microwave radio: 1 - 40 GHz Frequency Satellite Communications: 100 MHz- 275 GHz 103 106 109 8 9 1012 6 -1015 ._.$. •1018 60 Hz 1 kHz 1MHz 1 GHz Frequency (Hz) Lucent Technologies - Proprietary Use pursuant to Company instructions .1,` •. , t n ,.., , 1 70v-u.•,., "d Sd,O,•I..d r.,,`.,,+n,'arm,r,un.,,n u-•rdo,, I•., ,a•- dv,.l • F,4,:, ,. I t , •y` 11' +g •"1 jt 4 [ONWI.T YOUR LAWTP""rnRt st OTMNO Thu INSTRUPAIWT—TNG IHSTRUPA1NT YMOUID if""'17 LAWrlf 01��+ . . I. �` r�,y,r,{ • 1tttt�!• a • ►. ' ''1,L.•41•.•..1:-..,4.;r:: A zz I FR jOCT.1, rAtf 1611 L��- 1,F- •"�= �' ra ts f, "� a 1\ 111 THIS INDENTURE,made the a.3 day of July ,ninetelr hundred and.seventy- L.ve 11 r • ,or r .,4 ii s `ti IIL•TWEr.N �.,.� '':.•:::',�� + f''Y A EDWARD w. LATHAN, residing at Mal.n Road (no number) ;hu iia • • • '•, `._ ti iri•t, •i Orient, New York ' • t 1'• t � �' +t t., r U i ,y 1 'ht• • �:M, •f ♦i •'1‘.,11,:34.`ti C-- ,_,•▪ e , /ter v� •' 'a•NtI ' party of the first part,ami • ..;,▪P ( 7 +,i •••�..� .:3 t-' w ,. w ;,, s .r . `�. ORIENT CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH, UNITED CHURCH OF + lj ! 1{' S••i • s,l j �., + sti t Ir G , :' CHRIST OF GRIENT NfW YORK, a religious ,corporation. :+ 1 ' l 'I r r `� ',416,:T1 i ' duly organized and existing under the laws of the State • �1 ' t t1•A '•` . .r of New York, having its house of worship at Main Road -'�ti( f + , I, '1't 1.1'; ,.4'4•44,° '"t),..'-ftl.i:L.!121.t1-ri'` (�n� nl>Ermber) , Orient, New York •; , Y I' ' :,; party of the set rt pa S1' ij)• • �, 1 WTINESSEII-I,that the p -i of the first part,in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable eonsideratioet;,,'n•T , 4�., ' ,11 • 4,' paid ily the party of the world part,does hereby grant and release unto the party of the secood part,the heirs l s '•'4.1:..1 +C•t r` •n. or su cessou s and assigrs of the party of the sac:Td part forever, ,• ,t,},• c,;•;,a " '11...i';''. .. , 1 •If t`•1+ } 'ti 1.• • AL) that certain plot, piece or parcel of land,AMIDtLptli 4 'x7ntL7d7crgneo�emc7tRc�tfose11t1O[!iMt'Det, sitrnte,tci.0 r } . ;II;'t't t' ''',t*t r'•Vo:'r No Consider lying and beingiistotic at Orient, Town of Southold" County of Suffolk and ;';l 1 +, ';':;:t11. a'Lr *4 ' ation. State of New York, bounded and described en follows: •- ••cs='• " "1 �' in".;' .',t�'r i'r;,4't ;� f + 4~ r BEGINNING a t the aorthwtrs terly corner,of land•of the•patty,af. the^ h'• 1 � c „ 1r N {; ' Y� �; ' second part and a sot:thwester ly corner.,of,land heretofore`conveyed ls,;,, i; ( I t� !•+r ' a l ••;•••s-,!•,..."....•I ,r m " by the party of the first part to Oys'-'3rponds Union::Free':SchooY'. , r,,. 1,' . ,;i�• �t ; .� o District in Orient., ad oining Land of 'Jawreclti,`said-point'of ;.,'":, 'r'u, • 9 i r J'•1 `` + !Y,E�yt t 11 o•+•• m " beginning being 224,30 feet northerly,'along said'-land of"the'.,party,;7«1t' 1 • i 4 4 ;Z'1 r a of the second part,frost the Main Road frotn'said ,point?o£'begtnnitigr�`+.�,t, 11 „e { *'� running :sloop said'.land of Jaurrecki, Not.'th,13 degrees,'�.2;niinittea`r•Y • z'� ` 4 1i „!4r r . 10 seconds East 60,70 facet;,,thence along:.11+end of; Oysterponde;Utiirci e ,+T ,�• ..j: ;i !Y '!t ` +• fb• g 'O , Free School Dist=rict is Orient, South'''77,1,degreesl•';36t'minuted'till.t ; r",p1Ts? ' 11.1 1 " 'I it i 71, 1 9Y�+j ° .e j; 302,30 feet to land of Oyster'ponds Union•Frvel`School Distirict•in .:i;��rrY' ' �' ' I r. "': �* •::4•:••1,',,>I1 '1 Orie.it; thence along said land,•South:13,.degreedr;SF,1;minutes'.10,,heCoediX ; •i'+f$�, ,;i ( West 43.70 feet to said land ,�of'the party of-tori.-'second':part, thenoi<<` 4 , •1 "' 1:- NlV+1 t , ' a1'sng said Tarr] of the party of the second part;,,;two:coureee �1)' :; ^' !` , a. '1; .i` ' •' North 83 degrees 31 minutes 10 seconds Weat'185:9L feet';'' t• hence••,,;,•`'▪j,.-b_ai,• '• ; ' ' 9.J t;;ta. t + +4 (2) north 76 degrees 32 minutes 20 seconds'West?'•117:84 •feet,:to';thb?l;' "s -+ '1 IL I, „r� 'v. point orplace _or:BEGINNING. :Containin 0.393•=acres ` ::-1 ' '�J :4,"' ° w p inti its ;' ' - ,r ` �.' , - -1.-.4 •..;- .0.^,•..... i,,^_•,mly,_,.)•'`Yw 1't ' I - r Y ,l ,t.ri,• % ' I`•BSING'AND INTENDED'10 BE:ai•port'j.on ofsthe`.same+,;Spreteises4•ccilveyedo;ttt` 5'~.;* 1- t t 11-1' • .! is - t "e' ,S' tea + , !. 'a'I , 1`'E the party of the'.,first, part 'liy?Deed ciistid; " PCS SITE AGREEMENT April99 Site Name Orient Congregational Church Site I.D.NY 33XC678B 1. Premises and Use. Owner leases to Sprint Spectrum L.P., a Delaware the installation of any future equipment which (a) results in technical limited partnership("SSLP"),the site described below: interference problems with SSLP's then existing equipment or(b)encroaches [Check appropriate box(es)] onto the Site. 0 Land consisting of approximately square feet upon which SSLP will 10. Utilities. Owner represents that utilities adequate for SSLP's use of the construct its equipment base station and antenna structure; Site are available. SSLP will pay for all utilities used by it at the Site. Owner X Building interior space consisting of approximately 230 square feet; will cooperate With SSLP in SSLP's efforts to obtain utilities from any location x Building interior space for attachment of antennas; provided by Owner or the servicing utility, including signing any easement or 0 Building exterior space for placement of base station equipment; El antenna space between the foot and foot level on the Tower, other instrument reasonably required by the utility company. x Space required for cable runs to connect PCS equipment and antennas, 11. Termination. SSLP may terminate this Agreement at any time by notice in the location(s) of the steeple and the equipment room ("Site") shown on to Owner without further liability if SSLP does not obtain all permits or other approvals (collectively, "approval") required from any governmental authority Exhibit A, together with a non-exclusive easement for reasonable access thereto and to the appropriate, in the discretion of SSLP, source of electric or any easements required from any third party to operate the PCS system, and telephone facilities. The Site will be used by SSLP for the purpose of or if any such approval is canceled,expires or is withdrawn or terminated,or If Owner fails to have proper owhership of the Site or authority to enter into this installing, removing, replacing, modifying, maintaining and operating, at its , Agreement,or if SSLP,for any other reason,in its sole discretion,determines expense, a personal communications service system facility ("PCS that it will be unable to use theSite. Upon termination,all prepaid rent will be including,without limitation,antenna equipment, cable wiring,back-up power fixtures and, if retained by Owner unless such termination is due to Owners failure of proper sources(including generators and fuel storage tanks), related ownership or authority,or such termination is a result of Owner's default.See applicable to the Site, an antenna structure. SSLP will use the Site in a manner which will not unreasonably disturb the occupancy of Owner's other Rider tenants. SSLP will have access to the Site 24 hours per day, 7 days per 12. Default. If either party is in default under this Agreement for a period of week.See Rider (a) 15 days following receipt of notice from the non-defaulting party with 2. Term. The term of this Agreement (the "Initial Term") is 5 years, respect to a default which may be cured solely by the payment of money,or commencing on the date ("Commencement Date") both SSLP and Owner (b) 30 days following receipt of notice from the non-defaulting party with have executed this Agreement,This Agreement will be automatically renewed respect to a default which may not be cured solely by the payment of money, for four additional terms (each a "Renewal Term") of 5 years each, unless then, in either event, the non defaulting party may pursue any remedies SSLP provides Owner notice of intention not to renew not less than 90 days available to it against the defaulting party under applicable law,including,but prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or any Renewal Term. not limited to, the right to terminate this Agreement. If the non-monetary 3. Rent. Until the date which is 60 days after the issuance of a building default may not reasonably be cured within a 30-day period, this Agreement d,the receipt of may not be terminated if the defaulting party commences action to cure the permit,rent will be a one-time aggregate payment of which Owner acknowledges. Thereafter, rent will be paid in equal monthly cure th within such 30 day period and proceeds with due diligence to fully installments ofuntil increased as set forth herein),partial months cure the default. to be prorated, in advance. Rent for each Renewal Term will be the annual 13. Indemnity. Owner and SSLP each indemnifies the other against and rent in effect for the final year of the Initial Term or prior Renewal Term, as holds the Other harmless from any and all costs (including reasonable the case may be,increased by twenty percent(20%). attorneys'fees)and claims of liability or loss which arise out of the ownership, 4. Title and Quiet Possession. Owner represents and agrees(a)that it is use and/or occupancy of the Site by the indemnifying party. This indemnity the Owner of the Site; (b)that it has the right to enter into this Agreement; does not apply to any claims arising from the sole negligence or intentional (c)that the person signing this Agreement has the authority to sign; (d)that misconduct of the indemnified party. The indemnity obligations under this SSLP is entitled to access to the Site at all times and to the quiet possession Paragraph will survive termination of this Agreement. of the Site throughout the Initial Term and each Renewal Term so long as 14. Hazardous Substances. Owner represents that it has no knowledge of SSLP is not in default beyond the expiration of any cure period; and(e)that any substance, chemical or waste (collectively, "substance")on the Site that Owner shall not have unsupervised access to the Site or to the PCS is identified as hazardous,toxic or dangerous in any applicable federal,state equipment.See Rider or local law or regulation.SSLP will not introduce or use any such substance 5. Assignment/Subletting.SSLP shall have the right to sublease or assign on the Site in violation of any applicable law.See Rider its rights under this Agreement without notice to or consent of Owner. See 15. Subordination and Non-Disturbance. This Agreement is subordinate Rider to any mortgage or deed of trust now of record against the Site. •However, 6. Notices. All notices must be in writing and are effective only when promptly after the Agreement is fully executed,Owner will use diligent efforts deposited in the U.S. mail, certified and postage prepaid, or when sent via to obtain a non-disturbance agreement reasonably acceptable to SSLP from overnight delivery. Notices to SSLP are to be sent to Sprint Spectrum, L.P., the holder of any such mortgage or deed of trust. 4900 Main, Kansas City, Missouri 64112 Attn: Business Law Group with 16. Taxes. SSLP will be responsible for payment of all personal property copies to Sprint Spectrum, L.P., 4900 Main, Kansas City, Missouri 64112 taxes assessed directly upon and arising solely from its use of the Attn: Contracts Administration and Sprint PCS, 1 International Blvd., Suite communications facility on the Site. SSLP will pay to Owner any increase in 800, Mahwah, NJ 07495 Attn: Lease Management. Notices to Owner must real property taxes attributable solely to any improvements to the Site made be sent to the address shown underneath Owner's signature. by SSLP within 60 days after receipt of satisfactory documentation indicating 7. Improvements. SSLP may, at its expense, make such improvements on calculation of SSLP's share of such real estate taxes and payment of the real the Site as it deems necessary from time to time for the operation of the PCS estate taxes by Owner. Owner will pay when due all other real estate taxes and assessments attributable to the property of Owner of which the Site is a system. Owner agrees to cooperate with SSLP with respect to obtaining any required zoning approvals for the Site and such improvements. Upon part termination or expiration of this Agreement,SSLP may remove its equipment 17. Insurance. SSLP will procure and maintain commercial general liability and improvements and will restore the Site to substantially the condition insurance, with limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per existing on the Commencement Date, except for ordinary wear and tear and occurrence for bodily injury and property damage liability,with a certificate of casualty loss.See rider insurance to be furnished to Owner within 30 days of written request. Such 8. Compliance with Laws. Owner represents that Owner's property(includ- policy will provide that cancellation will not occur without at least 15 days prior ing the Site), and all improvements located thereon, are in substantial written notice to Owner. Each party hereby waives its right of recovery compliance with building, life/safety, disability and other laws, codes and against the other for any loss or damage covered by any insurance policies maintained by the waiving party. Each party will cause each insurance policy regulations of applicable governmental authorities. SSLP will substantially comply with all applicable laws relating to its possession and use of the Site. obtained by it to provide that the insurance company waives all rights of 9. Interference. SSLP will resolve technical interference problems with other recovery against the other party In connection with any damage covered by equipment located at the Site on the Commencement Date or any equipment such policy.See Rider 18. Maintenance. SSLP will be responsible for repairing and maintaining the that becomes attached to the Site at any future date when SSLP desires to add additional equipment to the Site. Likewise,Owner will not permit or suffer PCS system and any other improvements installed by SSLP at the Site in a proper operating and reasonably safe condition; provided, however if any OWNER:Orient Congregational Church,United Church such repair amaintenance is required due to the act: ,;wner,its agents or of Chris' j)rie New York employees,Owner shall reimburse SSLP for the reasi a costs incurred by SSLP to restore the damaged areas to the condition which, existed immediately prior thereto. Owner will maintain and repair all other portions of By: the property of which the Site is a part in a proper operating and reasonably Don Van Cleef safe condition. 19. Miscellaneous. (a) This Agreement applies to and binds the heirs, Its:Moderator o�j successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the parties to this S.S.Trax No.:#-0010 0 - /0 0 Agreement; (b)this Agreement is governed by the laws of the state in which Address:23045 Main Road,Orient,New York 11957 the Site is located; (c) If requested by SSLP, Owner agrees promptly to execute and deliver to SSLP a recordable Memorandum of this Agreement iri ZCa the form of Exhibit B; (d)this Agreement(including the Exhibits) constitutes Date: �v ' 1 the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior written and verbal agreements, representations,promises or understandings between the Sprint Spectrum L.P. parties. Any amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and executed by both parties; (e) If any provision of this Agreement is invalid or a Delaware limited partners 1. unenforceable with respect to any party,the remainder of this Agreement or /, - the application of such provision to persons other than those as to whom it is By:Michael McGovern u held invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected and each provision of this Its:Director- /U Regional Site De elopment NY/NJ Agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law; and (f) the prevailing party in any action or proceeding in court or mutually Date: y 12[ agreed upon arbitration proceeding to enforce the terms of this Agreement is entitled to receive its reasonable attorneys' fees and other reasonable enforcement costs and expenses from the non-prevailing party.See Rider 20. Non-Binding Until Fully Executed. This Agreement is for discussion purposes only and does not constitute a formal offer by either party. This Agreement is not and shall not be binding on either party until and unless it is fully executed by both parties. The following Exhibits are attached to and made a part of this Agreement: Exhibits A,LEI,LE2,LE3 and B. Attach Exhibit A-Site Description, LEI-Equipment Room Plan,LE2-Steeple Plan,LE3-South Elevation and Exhibit B-Memorandum of PCS Site Agreement. RIDER TO PCS SITE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SPRINT SPECTRUM,L.P. (SSLP)AND ORIENT CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH,UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST OF ORIENT,NEW YORK. (Owner). Provisions of this Rider are intended to supplement,rather than replace,the provisions of the PCS Site Agreement. However,Rider will govern in the event of a discrepancy with the Agreement between Sprint Spectrum,L.P. and Orient Congregational Church,United, Church of Christ of Orient,New York. 1. Clause 1 Premises and Use— A. The words"and shall utilize the Site in a manner so as not to disturb the Owner's use of the Premises as a house of worship. SSLP shall provide notice to Owner by contacting the Resident Pastor prior to entering the Site, except in the event of an emergency where such notice is not feasible. Owner may contact Michael Smolen at SSLP(Telephone#201-684-4097)with any inquiries Owner may have." B. It is agreed that in the space remaining within the Steeple after the installation of SSLP's equipment and antennas may be utilized by Owner,in its sole discretion, to co-locate additional PCS providers therein subject to the provisions of Clause 9 of the Agreement. 2. Clause 4 Title and Quiet Possession—Add at the end of the Clause the words, "except in the event of an emergency". 3. Clause 5 Assignment/Subletting—Add after the word"its"at line 2 of the Clause the word"entire." 4. Clause 7 Improvements—Substitute the word"shall"for the word"may"at line 5 of the Clause. 5. Clause 11 Termination—Add at line 7 after the word"if'the words"following the expiration of the initial term." 6. Clause 14 Hazardous Substances—Add at the end of the Clause the words"and in the event of a breach of this covenant, SSLP shall remediate same at its sole cost and expense. 7. Clause 17 Insurance—Substitute the word"$5,000,000.00"for the word "$1,000,000,00"at line 2 of the Clause; add after the word"insurance"at line 4 the words"naming Owner as insured thereon." 8. Clause 19 Miscellaneous— A. Add the words"(g) in the event the Owner is named a defendant in any litigation resulting from SSLP seeking to obtain the necessary municipal approvals for the Site as contemplated by this Agreement, SSLP shall, at its sole costs and expense, defend Owner with respect to said litigation." B. Add the words"(h)Owner represents to SSLP that it has occupied the Premises for in excess of one hundred(150)years and that, to the best of Owner's knowledge,there have been no claims made against Owner challenging its title to the Premises or its use and occupancy thereof." Owner Initials 6'" SSLP Initials EXHIBIT A . April 99 Site Name Orient Congregational Church_ PCS Site Agreement Site I. D.NY33XC678B Site Description Site situated in the Hamlet of Orient,County of Suffolk,State of New York,At premises commonly described as follows: 23045 Main Road Orient NY 11957 District 1000, Section 018.00, Block 02.00, Lot 022.001 Sketch of Site to be Attached: Owner Initials II"1' SSLP Initials kik Note:Owner and SSLP may,at SSLP's option,replace this Exhibit with an exhibit setting forth the legal description of the property on which the Site is located and/or an as-built drawing depicting the Site. *[Use this Exhibit A for PCS Site Agreement,Memorandum of PCS Site Agreement,Option Agreement and Memorandum of Option Agreement.] EXISTING STAIRS TO _ A___ ....._1 " ;r _ • • /_ i i EXISTING HVAC UNIT TO :. • - REMAIN N PROPOSED SPRINT PCS EXISTING ACCESSORY HVAC UNIT • BUILDING PROPOSED SPRINT PCS CONDENSER MOUNTED ON 20'-0" CONCRETE PAD PROPOSED 11'-6"X20'-0"SPRINT c.„..:0 --ss-'r-- PCS EQUIPMENT AREA 114. PROPOSED SPRINT PCS Ill BATTERY CABINET • 1L36. 130":Y 8'—D" 13'-8 �o PROPOSED SPRINT PCS 6" aPRC I FUTURE CONDUITS FROM EXISTING _ L GROWTH J ° ACCESSORY BUILDING TO Mu 111111111111 m EXISTING CHURCH - ' ill M 1-1 ' I—i "ROPOSED SPRINT PCS 12" COAX CABLE LADDER ILII IIII e: PROPOSED SPRINT PCS 12" COAX CABLE PORT PROPOSED SPRINT PCS CONDUITS IN EXISTING It O CHURCH CLOSET - I _ EXISTING ACCESSORY1111 EXISTING ORIENT - BUILDING ii CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH N PROPOSED SPRINT PCS COAX CABLES TO RUN ABOVE CEILING IN CHURCH • (TYP. OF 6) Wil' Il " MAIN ROAD • 1I KEY PLAN N.T.S ioEQUIPMENT ROOM PLAN Herbst • M SCALE: 1/8'4-0' Architects/Planners P R I N T PCS NO.: DATE: REVISIONS 1r °A TE CROSSROAD CORPORATE CENTER 05.09.01 1 INTERNATIONAL BLVD. SUITE 800 PROJECT NO.: MAHWAH, NJ 07495 S678A NY33XC678 4 0518.01 ANTRALOCATION DRAWING NO.: °� ORIENT 3 0511.01 ANIMA LOCATION 23045 MAIN ROAD . 2 O514.01 ROMEO AS PER IF l0 - ii 't 1 ... .y ORIENT, NY 11957 1 051101 FOR IOW - NO.: DATE: SUBMISSIONS '21, SHEET 1 OF 3 . i -EXISTING STEEPLE PROPOSED SPRINT PROVIDE NEW FIBERGLASS PANEL PCS ANTENNA COAX ® EACH ANTENNA LOCATION CABLE (TYP. FOR 3 SECTORS) ----------------- L 8 _ J ,,PROPOSED SPRINT � �� PCS SECTOR 240' �• II II PROPOSED SPRINT GAMMA ANTENNAS s• PCS SECTOR 55' (TYP. OF 2) ,L......L.........)1ALPHA ANTENNAS 6 �� =� 4 (TYP. OF 2) LINE OF EXISTING PROPOSED SPRINT BELL TOWER BELOW PCS SECTOR 150' BETA ANTENNAS (TYP. OF 2) • ..STEEPLE PLAN EXISTING BELL \ EXISTING BELL TOWER Nn ° ZL LIIi H n I� - /—T� _ LINE OF EXISTING I . ( I STEEPLE ABOVE .– L 2 v \ – I II II n H r EXISTING EXHAUST EXISTING BELLFAN TOWER ACCESS HATCH BELL TOWER PLAN 414Altki) nor • • CDSTEEPLE PLAN Herbst . Musci® SCALE: vs••r o' Architects/Planners SPRINT PCs NO.: DATE: • REVISIONS yr °A CROSSROAD CORPORATE CENTER 05.09.01 1 INTERNATIONAL BLVD. SUITE 800 MAHWAH. NJ 07495 PROJECT NO.: SUM NY33XC678 4 05.18.01D ANIMA LOCATION DRAWING NO.: ORIENT 3 11Th1 REVISED Aroma LOCATION ;,•, 23045 MAIN ROAD . ) 2 05:1401 REVD AS PER RF NO j ``^-,,, ..5 ORIENT, NY 11957 1 Di1101 FOR itEVlEVV NO.: DATE , SUBMISSIONS SHEET 2 OF 3 y e �� PR�rrSED SPRINT PCS PROPOSED FIBERGLASS i.., SECTOR ANTENNAS REPLACEMENT PANELS ® 11TYP. OF 3 SECTORS EACH SECTOR ANTENNAS r�i SEE SECTION ON THIS SHEET ll (TYP. OF 3) !� ria 62'-10"f A.G.L OF ANTENNAS EXISTING CROSS f Ii i��i 59'-10"t A.G.L BRACING ABOVE rl 11 OF ANTENNAS hi 13' r i 1 \i i PROPOSED i ,I I A / SPRINT PCS •► -�� ��- '�.i ANTENNAS �.�t,l;'�/1E ��1 , 48'-6"± A.G.L :,,i BASE OF STEEPLE r I-- Ail r 1 • r L----- 1 r 37'-6"± A.GL XISTING WOOD BASE OF BELL TOWER \I , STRUCTURE ® EXISTING ORIENT 13•r O., \ CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH SECTION , ;7� %'• SCALE:3/32'1=1 1 —0 — • 0 s; 0., : • I I GRADE A`'/ i SOUTH ELEVATION Herbst I SCALE: 3/374-0' Architects/Plannera • P R I N T P C S ' NO.: DATE: REVISIONS 1r DATE: 1 RNTERNATDIONARPBLVDE SUETS 800 05'09'01 MAHWAH, NJ 07495 PROJECT SNO.: 8678A . NY33XC678 4 05.13.01 REVISED tm ALOCAT1 DRAWING No.: ORIENT 3 WM LOCATION 23045 MAIN ROAD 2 051(01 REVISED AS PER Ilf 8� • ORIENT, NY 11957 1 051101 FOR REVEW NO.: DATE: SUBMISSIONS SHEET 3 OF 3 OWNER NOTARY BLO ®D�on�Van Cleef STATE OF "''�� COUNTY OF LiP 0 L I4 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this \'0 day of AiDf&fritilk2001, ❑byV1124-1A 0 a .V44 & ,0 by ,as MoVE-R ei'ro. of'AYe–obe•1r'r'G01-16 '"),a LRsN 140-11%6oQ..�corporation,on behalf of the corporation, by , partner(or agent)on behalf ofr – �,� ,a artnerst ip. /14W igf S (AFFIX NOTARIAL SEAL) (O' L NOTARY SIGNATUr E) NO •i•Y PUBLIC—STATE OF Veronica P. Mims Notary Public, State of New York • No: 82-4661406 ��++,,,, Qualified In Suffolk County My commission expires: (PRINTED,TYPED OR"ORil'@�Wtti Na Y'jeC•310.t;0 COMMISSION NUMBER: STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 19 , 0 b , Clby ,as of ,a corporation,on behalf of the corporation, • by ,partner(or agent)on behalf of ,a partnership. (AFFIX NOTARIAL SEAL) (OFFICIAL NOTARY SIGNATURE) NOTARY PUBLIC—STATE OF My commission expires: (PRINTED,TYPED OR STAMPED NAME OF NOTARY) COMMISSION NUMBER: SSLP NOTARY BLOCK: ( ; STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by of Sprint Spectrum L.P.,a Delaware limited partnership,who executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of such corporation. (AFFIX NOTARIAL SEAL) (OFFICIAL NOTARY SIGNATURE) NOTARY PUBLIC—STATE OF My commission expires: (PRINTED,TYPED OR STAMPED NAME OF NOTARY) STATE OF Mj. COUNTY OF g6r1 d n / 2 2 00 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,-9-g-- ,by I�l C Y1 a 6.1 MC_ CI (AFFIX NOTARIAL SEAL) (OFFICIAL NOTARY SIGNATURE) NOTARY PUBLIC—STATE OF &JJ TRACY A,LEE Notary Public,State of Nov/Jamey NTEI�'� iL®.#2276225 s J nD My commission expires: (PRITArQs MPENAME16.2406 OF NOTARY) LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION FOR ZONING AND TESTING PURPOSES Municipality: Hamlet of Orient Orient Congregational Church, United Church of Christ of Orient,New York, the Owner of 2305 Main Road,Orient,New York 11957(the"Property"),does hereby appoint SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.("Sprint")and its employees,agents and contractors,as Owner's agent for the purpose of filing and completing any application necessary for constructing or installing on the Property, such antennas,support structures and related equipment as Sprint may require for its commercial mobile radio system.Owner further agrees that Sprint and its employees,agents and contractors,shall have such access to the Property as Sprint may require for evaluating environmental,radio coverage,and other conditions at, on or below the Property. Sprint shall be responsible for all costs, fees and expenses incurred in securing any approval, or in connection with any testing. Assessor's Parcel Number: District 1000, Section 018.00, Block 02.00,Lot 022.001. Property Owner: Authorized Agent: Orient Congregational Church., United Church Christ of Orient,New York SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. By: Name: Don Van Cleef Title: Moderator Authorized Signatory Signed and Sworn to before me 's a)day of I id t `� p2001 / 1� Veronica F. Cidone lry Public, State of New York No: 52-4661408 Notary Public Qualified in Suffolk Cou Commission Expires Dec.31, f QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING_, WITH YOUR Z.B.A. APPL IcAxloM • A. Please disclose the names of the owner(s) and any other individuals +and entities) having a financial interest in the subject premises and a description of their interests: (Separate sheet may be attached. ) Orient Congregational Church, United Church of Christ of Orient, New York • • B. Is the subject prewises listed on the real estate market for sale or being shown, to prospective buyers? ( ) Yes (x ) No. (If Yes, please attach copy of "conditions*" of sale. ) C. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? { } Yes { x} No- . D. 1. Axe there any areas which contain wetlamd grasses? No 2. Are the wetland areas shown on the map submitted with this application? No 3 . Is the properIcy bulkheaded. between the wetlands area. ,,zed the upland building area? No 4. 14 your property cont►{rpt wetlands or pond areas , have • • you contacted the Office of the flown Trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? No-, E. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea . ,levee.? N/A-. (If not applicable, state "N.A. ") F. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences which exist and are not shown on the survey map that you axe submitting? If none exist, please state "none." G. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? If yes, please submit a copy • ' of your building permit and ap approved by the Building Department. If none, please state. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land close to tbis parcel.? _U2_ If yes, please explain where or submit copies • of deeds. • I. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel exsiting church and , proposed use Install public utilit wireless telecommunications antennas inside c urc steep e. ORIENT CONGREVUOFYAL CHURCH B L = f JJ. • . . / Nl Q6�`t�CZ - Authorized 6.1.gnatune ! Date . 3/87, lO/9011e ~ 1 (, -}c TOWN OF SOUTHOLD X In the Matter of the Application of OWNER'S AUTHORIZATION SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. . Premises: 23045 Main Road . Orient,New York X STATE OF NEW YORK) ) SS.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) V©t`' c-o • V CL�-F , being duly sworn, deposes and says: I hold title to the premises known as District 1000, Section 18, Block 2, Lot 22.1 (the "Premises" hereafter), and do hereby authorize Sprint Spectrum L.P. ("Sprint" hereafter) and its representatives to bring such applications for municipal approvals as may be necessary for constructing or installing on the Premises such antennas,support structures,and related equipment as Sprint may require for the establishment of its public utility wireless telecommunication facility. As such, I will fully cooperate with Sprint and its agents in obtaining any required Approvals. 00-14.,-,2, -E a,_._e_0 c Qf (Owner's Signature) p l Mle=.9,F ro c'-- Sworn to before me this o 2i �� 4W0c'�. Z1lu,Rclt 014 AI.•y of _ , 2002. i / ��� I , / Veronica F. Cidone �� - Notary Public, State of New York Y PUBLIC No: - 'x61406 Quallified in Suffolk County, Commission Expires Dec.31, &OOS • • 1+-16-4IV8fl—Text 12 PROJECT I.D.NUMBER 617.21 SEOR Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL, ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) t. APPLICANT/SPONSOR w-. 2. PROJECT NAME Sprint Spectrum L.P. Orient Congregational Church 1. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality Orient county Suffolk 4. PRECISE LOCATION(Street apdra$and road Intersections,promrnent IXndmarfts,etc..or provide mao) North side of Main Road, East of Youngs Road • 23045 Main Road Orient, New York 11957 S. IS PROPOSED ACTION: 0 New ©Exoartalon D Modfflcatlon/atteraticn X OTHER Public utility wireless telecommuni ations 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Install public utility wireless telecommunications antennas inside church steeple. • 7, AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: 1 Initially 0 0 1 acres Ultimately e 0 acres 8. WILL PROPOSEDEXISTING COMPLY WITH ZONING OR OTHER EX1STi,JG LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? ®Yes 0 No It No,describe briefly By Special Exception Permit, Section 100-162 (1) and Section 100-163. 9, WeIAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT' • n LE Residential t0_.Industrial U Commercial 0 Agriculture Q FaritifoIaauOpen space (g Other CI3OOI: Church lies on north side of Main Road. To the north and east of the premises lies Oysterponds Elementary School. Residences lies to the east and west of the property along Main Road. To the southeast is_ _Or_ient_ Cemetary and orient Fire O. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL.OR FUNDING.NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY YOTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERAL, P istrict. STATE OR LOCAL)? • 1.1 Yea Q No It yes,IISt apency(s)end OerrnitlapArova!S 11. 0DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE AOTI. N HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? Yea EN, II ye_,list agtney name and perm,Uadpt0v,I t2. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? 0 Ya= idi J Ho I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE I5 TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: ___Michael McGovern , 0 tor". Sit evelopment NY/NJ 4/(� Oale: �p1 / SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. G/ Slgnalure: B • If the action is in the Coastal •Tea, and you are a state agency, complete lee Coastal Assessment F9r• before proceeding with this assessment r • \> ��.tlanticWestern Consulting,Inc. Sprint Proposed Site—23045 Main Road, Orient, NY 11971 Site Location Alternative Analysis June 17, 2002 I am a Property Consultant for Atlantic Western Consulting, Inc., and,in that capacity,negotiated a site lease agreement for Sprint Spectrum L.P. for a site located at 23045 Main Road, Orient,NY. The following factors were considered in the site selection of this location: Pursuant to the Southold Zoning Ordinance Section 100-163D2,the following alternate site was evaluated by Sprint Spectrum L.P. as a potential site for a wireless facility in the Town of Southold: Orient Fire District 23300 Main Road, Orient, NY. Site was rejected due to the location requires the construction of a monopole or tower to provide adequate coverage for the intended coverage area. There are no other viable structures of sufficient height in the Orient area for a potential wireless facility. All other options would entail building a new structure in communities where the existing structures are substantially lower. The primary site, 23045, Orient, is an existing 76'-8" church steeple. Sprint Spectrum L.P. proposes to install its antennas at a 62-foot elevation. The 76"-8" existing structure is necessary in order to support Sprint Spectrum L.P.'s antennas and provide adequate coverage for the intended coverage area. Utilizing this existing structure will have no aesthetic impact in this area and will minimize the environmental impact by eliminating the need for an additional structure in Orient. ATLANTIC STE' 'ONSULTING,INC. `s By: Ed Brennan 800 West Cummings Park,Suite 4500 Woburn,Massachusetts 01801 PHONE 781-932-1313 FAX 781-932-9193 Pi) o ose o o7a; kiMMICV0 000CoaTregati® U 0NL0Gi] Congregational CRLEMill IMP A 1111, 6:4S4 Sprint PCS System Southold, New York • (ft\/ t± t:ite h:l posed verage [;I Current .4: •Proposed 1 o ose o UcLeD -i7_ 3kMC678 0 or-off CongeDloil 17-• X3 C678 / iii, v/i �A // i Y07,XXCC782 t / i / P'' „ di, ,. _,. : . _ . _ ..._, , / / D� ir c,-. ilit: ,,O1 // kkkk/ �� NY07XC //// / e / // / / , / 11i IS1 /, /� ,iib// NY33 C688 k / ' ..R 40 0,1 NY.O7XC761 AL \ Sprint PCS -Southold NY V A July 2002 AOn Air dinwilmmill I Proposed PGo 0 es o o RV I, K© ©U J ©Mgt egatio7iU © ft r. Orient Congregational - Church I 1 t lVillags of Green•• oi Sprint PCS System Southold, New York "'?Proposed Site DOn Air Site _.......& 414._ ,d -l. i MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & RE ATTORNEYS AT LAW REPLY TO: 0 REPLY TO: Gil 160 MIDDLE NECK ROAD 36 NORTH NEW YORK AVENUE GREAT NECK, NEW YORK 11021 • HUNTINGTON, NEW YORK 11743 (516) 487-6500 (631) 425-4100 TELECOPIER TELECOPIER (516) 487-6539 (631) 425-4104 January 27, 2003 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals \'•;'• - 53095 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 Re: Application for Special Use Permit For Sprint Spectrum L.P. Public Hearing February 20, 2003 Premises: Orient Congregational Church 23045 Main Road, Orient,NY 11957 Tax Map No. 1000 Section 18,Block 2,Lot 22.1 Sir/Madam: On January 21, 2003, Lynanne Huertas of our firm visited the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals to obtain the poster required for our client Sprint Spectrum L.P.'s public hearing notification for the captioned Application. At that time, Ms. Huertas obtained the poster board and was advised that the wording for the poster would be available at a later date. It was agreed that our office would provide a stamped, self-addressed envelope for the mailing of the poster notice to our office. Toward that end, we are enclosing a pre-paid second day air UPS return envelope for you use. Thanking you for your courtesies,we remain, Very truly yours, MUNLEY,MEADE,NIELSEN&RE By: Zaatizence C. I`2 . Lawrence C. Re LCR/lh Enclosure Page 36 February 20, 2003 Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting Public Hearing 1:38 p.m. Appl.No. 5224- SPRINT SPECTRUM,LLP. This is a request for a Special Exception under Section 100-162A.1 regarding the proposed installation of telecommunications antennas inside the existing(church) steeple/building, located at 23045 Main Road, Orient; Parcel 1000-18-2-22.1. CHAIRWOMAN: Is someone here who would like to speak on behalf of the application? LAWRENCE RE, ESQ: Good afternoon. Appearing for the applicant, Lawrence Re, Mundley, Meade,Neilson and Re 36 North NY Ave., Huntington. May I proceed? CHAIRWOMAN: Certainly. MR. RE: In this application Sprit Spectrum LP is seeking a special use permit to enable it to install small wireless panel antennas in the steeple of the congregational church in Orient and to install related equipment in there and an accessory building on the premises. As the board is aware, Sprint is licensed by the FCC to construct,maintain, and operate a wireless communication system here in Suffolk County and throughout the US and it's services are a benefit to the community particularly when in an emergency for placing calls to 911 when conventional phones are not available or operating. I think the statistics most recently show that about 45% of all calls placed to 911 are made from mobile telephones. So they have become part of safety network of the community. At the present time, Sprint does not have reliable service in the Orient area. In order to provide reliable service we must establish an antenna site and as the board is aware, Sprint has been going out of it's way to try to utilize existing structures rather than to come before this board seeking a permit to build a new tower. In this case we've done one better, we've found not only an existing structure but we found a way to make the entire site invisible to the outside world. The antennas will be completely enclosed within the steeple and the related equipment will be in an accessory building on the grounds near the church. The site would be unmanned monitored remotely on a continuous basis 24 hours a day, 365 days a year and the site will operate at such a low power level that we will be at 125 times less than the FCC standard. I have a number of exhibits that I can submit and I have a number of witnesses here. Rather than go through a lengthy procedure, what I can do if the board would prefer is to submit a report from each witness and then I have them here if you'd like to ask questions or hear anything further. And also rather than go back and forth with these exhibits, I can list them and then bring them up all at once. The first is an affidavit of James McConnell,he is here today he is a radio frequency engineer for Sprint and in his affidavit he explains how the system works, why this site is needed and then with accompanying maps,he shows where the existing coverage is and what coverage this site would provide. I also have a planning study prepared by Frudenhal and Elkowicz and Terry Elkowicz the principal planner is also here. I have a report by Sianetics that comprehensively analyzes the radio frequency emissions from this site and concludes that the site will be within the FCC limits and it's principal Lou Cornoccia is here should you have any questions. and we have the affidavit of Michael-Lynch, licensed RE appraiser that attests that this proposed site would not have a negative effect on property values of the surrounding area. And Mr. Lynch is here. I also have letter from the State Historic Preservation office that conditionally approves our application with the conditions and we can Page 36 of 63 Page 37 February 20, 2003 Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting Public Hearing abide by the conditions listed so we do have approval of SHIPO and lastly Ms. Kowalski was kind enough to provide me with a copy of a correspondence from Ann Hopkins that was sent by e-mail today was one Ann Hopskins that expresses her support for this application and I'd like to submit that as well. CHAIRWOMAN: We have that in the record: MR. RE: Having said that, if the board has any questions with respect to the layout we have the architect here and we have the planner here with regard to planning issues with regard to propagation we have the radio frequency engineer here the appraiser and we also have the health expert. CHAIRWOMAN: I went through the plans quite carefully I just- the existing church steeple is 76' tall? MR. RE: Yes it's 76. The center line of the antennas will be 62'10" inside the steeple. CHAIRWOMAN: How many antennas is this going to be? MR. RE: There are 6 panel antennas. They measure 30" in length and 8" in width and 2.75" in depth. I think they are shown on ZO5. The steeple itself was erected in 1940 following the hurricane of'38 and we are going to preserve and restore the shingles that are removed in the church building. CHAIRWOMAN: From the exterior of the building when I go by,what am I going to see other than a church steeple? MR. RE: It's going to look identical. The shingles that are removed will be replaced with shingles that are transparent for radio frequency transmissions,but will have the same appearance as the existing shingles and then the church steeple will be re-painted so you will see the- it will be identical in appearance. CHAIRWOMAN: When I drive by, I'm not going to in any way, there won't be any hint that there is a- MR. RE: None whatsoever. CHAIRWOMAN: I'm going to turn it over to the board members. Mr. Goehringer. MEMBER GOEHRINGER: I'd like to ask Terry Elkowicz a question if I could. Terry you've been before this board many times how many of these situations do you see from a planning aspect placed in steeples and this is not an undisclosed location it's the public hearing,but prior to this public hearing how would we know if anything was placed in dome of a school or steeple of a church? Page 37 of 63 Page 38 - February 20, 2003 Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting Public Hearing MS. ELKOWICZ: I can't speak for the radio engineers but I can speak for my own experience representing 6 cellular companies. What we try to do is we do try, the carriers do try to design these things so they can be more as invisible or as unobtrusive as possible and the reason for that is obvious. We don't enjoy coming before boards like this with an application that's difficult for you for me. Now if you're asking me could someone go and put something in this steeple and never come to you and you wouldn't know it? - MEMBER GOEHRINGER: No I'm just saying in your past experience as a planning expert how many of these have you seen? MS. ELKOWICZ: These particular ones, I've probably worked on 4 but you have to also remember this is a difficult process for a carrier because a carrier is confined to various parameters like where is your service deficiency. And the first thing they look for is I have a service deficiency gap and I can only put the site in one particular area to address this gap. The first thing they look for is are there any tall structures and then they immediately go to try to lease that tall structure because believe me none of us enjoy coming to you to try to erect new structures. MEMBER GOEHRINGER: Interesting. In the past when you have come before us in difficult hearings we were talking about silos, we were talking about trees, we were talking about all types of other disguised types of structures. The steeple aspect although new to me is an interesting form of hiding these types of antennas. Where the antenna is in effect the only thing that's really hidden all the mechanical aspect of it is in the building. MS. ELKOWICZ: In the basement in the building immediately to the north and all of the conduit is underground so you will not see the wiring, you won't see the equipment and you will not see the antenna. And the steeple will look as it does today. MEMBER GOEHRINGER: From a planning perspective, you find absolutely no change at all as this gentleman spoke to the chairperson was addressing us we will see absolutely nothing except possibly a minor change in the color of shingles for a certain period of time. MS. ELKOWICZ: Until it gets painted yes and that is echoed by the letter that Mr. Re submitted to the board from the NYS office of parks recreation historic preservation because you read their opinion and the reason why they issued a letter of no effect is that this will not in any way effect the visual or historic integrity of that steeple or the building. MEMBER GOEHRINGER: Is there any loading, I know this is not a question for you,but is there any loading thing that we have to wony about. MR. RE: I can the simple answer is no. I have the architect here who answered the same question when we appeared before the planning boards. Mr. Rifaat, why don't you come up. MR. RIFAAT. ARCH: My name is Rifaat, I'm with &Mesiano, 240 Cedar Knolls Rd. in Cedar Knolls, NJ. I'm a licensed architect in NY. Page 38 of 63 Page 39 February 20, 2003 Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting Public Hearing MEMBER GOEHRINGER: The approximate weight of the antennas? MR. RIFAAT: They are 9 lbs. Each. • MEMBER GOEHRINGER: Times 4? CHAIRWOMAN: 6. MEMBER GOEHRINGER: Times 6, I'm sorry. MR. RIFAAT: Roughly 60 pounds with mounting brackets. 60-70 pounds maximum I would say. MEMBER GOEHRINGER: And the cable is insignificant in your opinion? MR. RIFAAT: I would say so yes, 7" cable for that run until it's supported so add another 10 pounds if you like which would be a lot probably. MEMBER GOEHRINGER: So in your opinion the structural integrity of the steeple would not be compromised in any way? MR. RIFAAT: No way. MEMBER GOEHRINGER: In no way am I asking these questions saying that I'm in favor of this, I'm very simply asking them as a matter of education and I thank you. MEMBER HORNING: Your current coverage extends through the village of Greenport area I see on the map? MR. RE: Yes the map shows that we have coverage in Greenport approaching Orient, it doesn't make it to Orient and this would provide the coverage in Orient. We have a larger blow up map that Mr. McConnell could show the board that I think would be helpful here. The smaller map that we submitted, this would be a little clearer. MEMBER HORNING: Can you tell us for the record how many Sprint subscribers you have for the township of Southold? MR. RE: Because this is a mobile technology, many users of the service in Southold are coming from elsewhere and in Orient I guess in particular on the way to the ferry, so I don't know whether the statistic is - if you were to look at the along Rt. 25 there is a significant amount of traffic of users partaking of the service. MEMBER HORNING: Is your motivation to pick up new subscribers? Page 39 of 63 Page 40 February 20, 2003 Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting Public Hearing MR. RE: We are licensed throughout Suffolk County and throughout much of the US. Our motivation is to provide the service our customers expect when they sign up. It's like a washing machine when you turn it on you expect it to work. The customers expect reliable service throughout the license coverage area and we simply can't provide service to areas in Orient. MEMBER HORNING: Is there any maximum number of subscribers that you can handle at any given time? I hear tales of people not being able to make calls at certain times of the day because it's busy and such. JAMES MCCONNELL: James McConnell;,Sprint PCS, 1 International Blvd., Mahwah NJ. You are absolutely correct in that there is a maximum capacity on any type of wireless system be it GSN technology, TDA technology or CDMA technology which is what we employ. That's what you're referring to when people complain about not being able to make calls at certain times those are what we call our peak hour times. In those instances when our blocking rates that's known as blocking when a call can't go through. When our blocking rates start getting significant, we've got options to address that one being adding additional carriers which is not necessarily any equipment change the modular cabinets equipment that our radios fit in we can handle up to six carriers. In other words we can employ additional frequencies which make no physical change to the existing system. Each cabinet can handle up to 6 maximum radio frequencies at a time. In the rare event that we had to, we are licensed to go up to 11 which would entail adding another mod cell. But for point of reference right now, Manhattan is only at 3, so the odds of Orient ever getting to that stage are pretty minimal I think. Does that answer your question? MEMBER HORNING: What I'm trying to get at is the proposal is to lease some in the basement of a pre-existing accessory building to hold the telecommunications equipment associated with the antenna. Is that correct? MR. RE: Yes. MEMBER HORNING: Is there adequate space in that basement, that adequate space exists within that building to handle all your future needs? MR. RE: We always build in a margin of comfort in anticipating future needs and the answer is yes. MEMBER HORNING: To increase your capacities at this particular proposed site what are you saying that you would have to do in addition to what you are proposing? MR. RE: The site is designed to handle certain margin of increased capacity for the future. MEMBER HORNING: And you feel 6 antennas and the equipment storage space is adequate? MR. RE: Yes. Page 40 of 63 Page 41 February 20, 2003 Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting Public Hearing MEMBER OLIVA: I just had one question. Being that the Orient Congregational Church is a historic building, what are the ramifications if by some chance the steeple was hit by lightening? MR. RE: James, would you be able to handle that question? MR. MCCONNELL: I'm not an expert in that but I can testify that our systems are fully grounded. They are grounded at various points for the very reason you're talking about. Understand most of our sites across the US are up on towers which are still structures anyway, lightening magnets. The odds are much greater of a structure like that being hit by lightening than say possibly the steeple but even as such:we do the systems are fully grounded there's breakers, there's the whole host of safety built in to not only the system being blown out but our investment too. This equipment costs a lot of money so we build in as much safety as we can. As far as causing any additional, is that your question, is it more likely to be hit by lightening? MEMBER OLIVA: I don't think so, it's one of the tallest structures in the neighborhood, I'm just concerned about fire. If there's anything there that could explode or do something that would cause a fire. MR. MCCONNELL: Oh no, not in my opinion. CHAIRWOMAN: Okay Mr. Re I'm going to see-if there are any questions from the audience. Is there anyone else in the audience who would like to speak for or against the application? If you could bring that map to the side and face it to the audience so they can see it. Seeing no hands, I'll make a motion closing the hearing reserving decision until later. Mr. Re I'm going to note that there is a letter in the file from the Planning Board in support of this as it is in keeping with the Town's goals of pole location and designs and to minimize the number of new structures and sites. PLEASE SEE MINUTES FOR RESOLUTION ***** Page 41 of 63 . ._ •3i; 1 Icif-",.Ary-- Gk'" . . . • --,---A- .,.4. -, ,...... .....,----. , , ,,, ..tti. .,.w...-b6.,ou„, _, _01?„, . .,,,4.ex„kil ,,,,;,.. .,1,,c---,,: '-'-vrioterillitat.oluligy Coaciof-- in I 4 Vi;itftfrtgq:-.1141stilig-- *6404 9480-11, a--*_-::,---kg7IP:r1r-414:N.Ak:Sttliat-23.131:', Aquopiktgrivoqkke.s.4,ws,kki;,,00tgf,04,1-"z,..5, T4Pli4k,,,, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK s,,,tkeWts,. :84,_TI:15,4*,, ,TOWN'130,p,,,,,,,,,,?:711,T,,,,,,,,,':,./sT10,-,-.".30,,,,:"k--' .:,4*,041414*89:0C'STATE OF NEW YORK ss: APPEALSwi::-wr a i011.1.-4'4"4::: :ler:g'Pa':;"! ' :tt'T-----q.4a0:0-q-kiLise Marinate being duly sworn, say 1411,:51VM4v,,,a40-c.,,w0AT-:.:*et--, 140)Si.',--, • , . sdii .wrd„, ,xN,s ,3_-, ,...4,%0J,,,,.•..N-1. Aeseej-. -eoL,,,a.-mi: .,_ bge.0-Aggi.that she is the Legal Advertisin:, Thursdayit 'FIl,f.:Okill', -t?.:11EL—ENa_"741 - FITIS-41ZC4F, '---1 q.-A -i noted,-.'!-.: -,-§w(Wgs ','..'_-TENANT-S-t',W04-Koffiligtik.w.,- 47 E'!'Coordinator, of the Traveler Watchmar Vthereafter ' ' try-'4-- - -is--iar ft el--ivz-----,a public newspaper printed at Southolc x"--, , -; Os.6i- ., -k,.- ,' t;- 1W *-,- c9P,...,.114c. t-L.','an-. -.:1.0anits4,r.14.41:640L:-..,..,,,,,,Gesr.,,,„ .,00.4.06,in Suffolk County; and,that the notice ( WEG6EattRlrL'i'uku*4ti.yt6H''I'''''::grogcqilagtt't,'-f:cr9S%te";.,_;;„t.'-.4;:-P,yil-Lll-tifisihij,.which the annexed is a printed copy, hz 4:910::4-h-litiAlg*Itifii4006011:'''O-M1,1.015Pig'- '- 1'2,05, A4954'.:iT1'.1 been published in said Travele ,1-,..„`'•-1--:- );.0oF". 2s-i. 0,...,.r..*?-..,, .iii,,..g---,.--c.040_,.0,-.- .',(i: 0t,4.',-/,"L`, n -v., 1:0f.-004•,,:.Pif,Y 41zogitkgeotmomptooc (,0 vabtvaAktx41To5i,,;-,t5- -2,- ,.1Watchman ._...once id.rite,Aach.c••:. ...w..e.e IgidOlvdabii41opzSoundsfOltefl0;s0444aor / week( 6uccessivel Agpr- pg404OppRkd4*SWParcel 49,,- 174e it9044pvte#4604iliptgo:446 10 49AppwRqAg§kcomm • n the day 6xfsfoK,votgl,midb-4406tGE' -Virk4Ihs4§-4. b2U. K .. 2003 06NOtitast)ita*taaikti -44qu644wkr, 606exaderi Oe-addititfi;iti;atefitioiS*41 Aiti61610edifi*:1002**V40d / ...'00:Pockirequirementt0041POWTIVIri44PP/41$00Xfx-4-01#C31o**,144A4v4NWON47P24024y4wycf 6?.iikptimli01I *16rOirapol74A •0151siik0.4h0 liiipth - 0egiokksV:Watieol Disapproval is second-story .t ifatiitilek,i,-018iiiitt. alitejario -I'',1•04,Iii&--- t ci-ap,rifail•lbe,',.), existing 1:411I-:-.14-k -i''-'r'''-,,•- •;•-•-- " "•-•'"l ''Ilr -00 l'fr-,IttiV 'front,,,,...,,,,-„-..:..-zy,..., ,,,•„-;,..i_i ,ess,..., ,' .7.,4 e..4.:9,rat; ,, ' -1.9,444.64-1-A01.17.14,6.0,1V --k-Igiffili6724,16111)414,51-64;foxil; •woVpefore me this da f;ratamthiiii-;13TElitiiiedAoiatili.littiCi-§:40*-45;::410-gitozofgi-; .6,taty, 2003. sot ii-RIC i.At'it,D..-;,,:au,.K-a_-,!Dmii,;:iu-}000,---, Indian Neck • .,, ---Avaigeodo tit::,t., -Ar4ap'p,e,,...:itAti>:Pecoriiec'WeTIVQ1146;6:i-,*Z-:- i'li.1164,-Sreeitoif10012,4-afaaSict fr.2V,..,..3;kfstez, ,-Avvo.,-.4-Ns-,,E,,J,, ,,;,,,•, ,,-.....,,, -.,,-..-,,,L.,4t - P4wAx4,•&',', --, c-..... o;1104104*1?„0" 1e2.141:0 ..2.-4:410..=:5via.0•41. , toPokzAt. ,,r.i.(40 . , - June.40fipoo2i,Notice ,Lkg BROWN;.--0--S.YefiSa ,-,;4114-31:16,,,#,v,,: • •• -0-• •••• ••• •••.• • Dk,Capyrket ....„,-„, .,icipli,1, ,, Ifte„soisit,fg64,,,,asvAo., an.,%,14,41.0rf---,-4, Notary Public - ".•,,pi.opose'd;',7 040 ,addition . Sections-ii,-:-.z $ 0.14 wandzi9,,,YA-0: i 4,aff#006*-0-00-1-wdweillfitriwatteto#*0.0010iii* with4i*Wej'-§104dik4-4044v9!4T,1.,,etitt:_bNovember 209_..tit,•-i - , • .. ,t.ji,;$,,1:10 feet oi' ci:,. ts-'•'ifiituniactriiia-yN•;t?:,..:•f0..fottAcY•f4-XfptsVa'fti:3 Emily Hamill taiallitws,,,:ald,..-vitaitihits15,....,,,vole •4,,,j--..v;iikftfro:00-AA. ,:.;•.;; NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New York ; stt:itmtaeititiik.4,trdoci-tyjpor4o i'...I.d ...ekrAtutitiotea4Aucto4 No.01HA5059984 ait.5**1044d1"::Vtw14.46tiG;-;740xfmt ,46---Sne#,,.4feotz-the, "''' Qualified in Suffolk County Otekfip#titaite16,72--14#frifl-- i' ..,' '' ear4vialabddie6t14.50''--'- Commission expires May 06,2006 #5Q-adic.,AkiviA 'cv,7•-m-7-,'•.+-7,it, -• tee 11 C,;AoW4.no.,,AuVerlhp. .-' . r, iiiiiailtfiogokm-VizaT&TOtt:Ataitrufa5 ,,-Vbitrdieftidif .,:' r,...ii$041td,StOi•4,YittkaiXec'.40-1*,--%.444106ii-40i6)*S_: : : $66150)*Sdit-i-,7-4W,10074i-04,43,04.k', -.7.'"'••,$"iiip, :blgoar).--4!,tPAToolF • :i- _...., ..,. .. *14404441000FOOPPI ,01614i!,',,i4. .".:L:r.,170147, , ,,--': 28i010,14%Notices tr 44.,,ofy,1 ,,,,,,v 10--A. , :,t4 ,, No 5267 f,:ii-oirdiookiid6isotkor„!-.1*-,.-60Y,EttEN6ings,.4,e 0. This is ' 120'"--;4CAPPP'.40t$;-:40p.oe,-,-- ..•-t,proat4---jpt4A214ii--4iceletodir 60s41100-*4f,,,adititi oiiis:4d-,:--,:,, •t.p,g0iv14p:04,y-43.*.ydie...doothre:-.,.,,,-. j,-211teratimisfirto.:,:::.-iic 7:existing z.-:'4400,!!i4,1.1-220.24it§.43,-,trAdjr.tige liwitiogo6korofoisitoitktr-m-itAitmiti•Alitakeq;:0-,::1' ..:'.0Z5PAllagli'Mei-1,CigdftigfitfDAAPM040,4#41,446Vof ,.,''; ,Patcellv.op43T.-2-4WJ-1. ,. .---:',." !,:--'40'-'aePORWrilt.,0430ift6tik ,-; at7-1.0f013':i:iii:4 :60VIN,02691,',4,:--:,-;Yalititooticig4,,Property 6925 trilltistIlleilVitg•-k4Ont:',.re.r,i,?:i.,-'-:,05r6frit--kORIS-,'r':iv-MbilT6i0c1Mq 46.411.C.$00.ti'c Variance under aiiiiiitraffigt 4 . • , .._ -, 9i42-,:§- 0.,. 0 Ataao•Aolsat610oag4:WM0o - ,41104 4*(?90Ciid ,AfklttieN104N ? , 4,;' gt440fW..:0 4610iiit****140141s ca t %wit444-0f44:,t-.:,1,,;,;-:--3,-I;IL.,-•: - 20040 •44(0%.ligl)Disapproval ..„,t'ii '1,:efOulf.'tii*lititillloo % x."-. 0 '-.,:r-- .0•044 -4,2.99p•--;1?-1;, ,,,zi•rr.s. =,Agoifito-N, v4 a T1i -I- , '-.i:•4'`:', '-', litlitc,:1161i0i,kver_.09' ,1 aivX.::::-'0 .4-` -. ',1:469,2.o..444 ofjt0.V4t: 13itIfst,_m,, ot• g$.._'043l,W'iti'-i... v'"... o,ttr'W4...t.,24.:.. :7•,lt aidiggtfAVW:tXfqtOOPPiO.VrAkAisigt49&0* 00K19)40Aurn A4C ff: V100111tg049sit* I0ftAspock;V4iAopttot-t ec4eotD t4p0107414 I400tiditwwoigfeo0Rogflrt ;, , , . *40064:*y„.3,.4"1,'6-:-:14:' ,- • 1.1.9004ii.g.-ad.40E1istPIONittr!iii-d4ipttyliet.:,Vtti.qAtV•VP..0:16. , • 0090.QtAt4gtiggkii4g4-1,:iv.9060#45.notit lot $0,q0,,imiiirlS4)5270?., Nr4Viel'il3t'xtiec-460,06.46- --.-,1: • Numut IttiAmisiwilifitat eef?;viaitaAr. ,, , 0e„Ef)Ifteidelitiafite: tergiteigIV-00-4Y*0041-IdOki,',1*"t'ilt-4*'''§4*af_61,1'$S*4604r,'-',-;i::i' isa,PV-1,1_4011-4411sloplisif,'ssktdogiiiftOtift:oili018ifatyai-„: „ -12p:ow, ', Aiatiiiietus '0;to et:',."- Cleileiti:01,6"-4 or before ?,..,•240 gvAtfisila:**t -iartRggi,X01;11:44abOiffAiiiiedlibi.,ifie• 1g .,.,w,,q•o-_o-k..cL-ctpxj$-etAliaig,-,,'f:cit:- 'tminim ;.-.-16.':--y•-•40,648iii 'ii,_-'kili, i,,_;K92.0s.6-#1.foictioit_Liiii-betiopf:-IiiefAiliiitt ::',.,--0001041.),,,,,p4,1-,,'. or-_-0k,tquo,444-p.,kvitg.x.w.:;:,,-..mg*:„.:.,tr..-ovilfosmowa, ) •--',,10:-1-68mf-,*tql400407;ItleT:9):i t:p!l'uirtIqlkirQ1):01)!--14,, x,. 1 '..400q0 90#4o101-14p.go,t1:040tP- ..itot,OP*0:0P-OkA .dpiebOtr.- opl,r4:00,k evii4,,,ppi.,-,mapppy,-4 ,,yoi,,it-§:TwolfssyttiLl, '• 'n_Wi ,feett The , 11,,E4fa.,. !..:Ptafit*Pir)*4-M-,9,w-,,'' :f.1.490-4 44. ,%Tiwilt es;g, qii.A-Asiaikle,":-dit6c,pitriW44Sylphiliiiib•-„-. 6-30 P4'Aroe-',.3-IfeY. 00:,.,:05-'4,-1;,-'.14,V0:-Tteiyiroxi.'',,,'Aoto-i-ialhwil30'arnr'--A.° O11, 44 •''' , ' 'Sg. rAcifir.• 0:461-'2rptt.fif 4fif83Location"/A4W 0 ,,.-o 1"'0; .--'-0e65 idet- mr.,bpew1457 qxPNeck R - K-k"''' ' --, . --"- 10-5?-• linty-6 ,-4,,V-,0)tid- llop 4, ill g,„,,,'., ,_,,, ,..tAx., isf..;:15,,,... ,,,,.-4 a, ts ,,-- c q I . - ,•,,,, ;g4N14,10,11Stre:replial wildif it-Nvo,,,,1-4,..irr die ---oic":„: ,4....a.,4., „ .--z .,,, - 4. , ,, ,,-,- —-: .,4,1 ,.., -;--4-20 am-„-,.,ppolv.Dro,m2241,---•-- .-_-,-_, - _-_,, -----,,,,„„Alipr:,oattial. No! - SPRINT- ' SPECTRUM, LLP., • LEGAL Numb , Z-A This is . This is a request for a Special tOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD . a'request for a-v°•ap.-Ce under " Exception Section 100- THURSDAY,FEBRUARY -- -,tIie Building,.-Department's' installation-of telecommunicition • ' 20,2003 PUBLIC - ' November"4,:2002'Notice Of anten'nas- inside the. .existing ' HEARINGS - Disapproval, 'Tlie--balis,-Of.the'' •(church)steePle/buildini,locate NOTICE - IS HEREBY NoticeofDiSapfroValisdiat the'- at 2304Y-Main Road, ,Orieht; rIVEN, pursuant to Section propOsed acc,essor);building is Parcel 10,0048-2-22.1. .457 of the Town' Law and design for habitable living area • 1:40"p.m. Appl. NO. 5218 - J. . - .. _ IT 1 1141/4 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD:NEW YORK x In the Matter of the Application of AFFIDAVIT SPRINT SPECTRUM, LLP OF (Name of Applicants) MAILINGS CTM Parcel #1000- 18-2-22.1 - COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, VIRGINIA WOODHOUSE residing at HUNTINGTON , New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: • On the 7th day of February , 2003, I personally mailed at the United States Post Office in HUNTINGTON , New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in prepaid envelopes addressed to current owners shown on the current assessment roll verified from the official records on file with the ( ) Assessors, or (X ) County Real Property Office • , for every property which abuts and is across a p lic or private street, or vehicular right-of- way of record, surrounding the applica is property. 1 (Signature) GINIA WOODHOUSE • Sworn to before me this day of b r u r y' , 2003 DOROTHY A. BELARD �� ���• Notary Public, State of New York (Nota Public) No. 016E6036810 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires Feb.7,2w- PLEASE list, on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. Thank you. U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIP s."- 'c ti al Only;No Insurance Covera•e Prov,.e. rn ORIENT,k`NY U 11957 : ) Lc_, .4p Postage $ 39.37 UNIT ID: 0744 u7 Certified Fee 2.5/� . L Postmark a Return Receipt FeeHere Q (Endorsement Required) 1.7t•75 © Restricted Delivery Fee Clerk: KRH3YX (Endorsement Required) ,..q Total Postage&Fees $ 4.41.42 02/07/03 O Sent To GLADYS JAWORECKI fU Street,Apt No, It or PO Box No. 250___XO_JN&S__RQAU OCity,State,ZIP+4 �` ORIENT, NY 11957 PS Form 3800,January 2001 See Reverse for Instructions. 0 RECEIPT 0'02v✓ insurance Coverage Provided) 30.16e2 •n visit our website at www.usps.come 2 Q9oy9 0 F ,�.. L USE Postage $ Q. UNIT ID: 0744 p Certified Fee e, pReturn Reclept Fee 1 �/� P Herea* (Endorsement Required) jr. Restricted Delivery Fee 1-1 (Endorsement Required) . Clerk: KBH3YX 11.1 Total Postage&Fees $ 4442 02/07/03 nJ Ezi 7Qt rnuticl. Eitinima L PA-0/ogtreet No.; Tb& c) or POBopxNo. POB 84 / 55 VILLAGE LANE city state ziP+a ORIENT, NY 11957 PS Form 3800 une 2002 See Reverse for Instructions U S Postal,$xeruuceTM �' , 'CERTIFIEDRECEIPT ' f`- (Doinestc Ma►I;Only,•":No Insurance Coverage Provided) . ;` ''rFor delivery.iriformation visit',our website at •-•` ({ www usps.corn® ruji Postage $ .20737 UNIT ID: 0744 Certified Fee 2.9�n p Postmark O Return Reciept Fee Here (Endorsement Required) 1.1575 Fin Restricted Delivery Fee Clerk.: KBH3YX (Endorsement Required) ru 4. � Total Postage&Fees 02/07/03 rU p Sent To t' WM. P. HOPKINS/MARY K. BAUMANN N Street,Apt No.; or PO Box No. 2211 BRQ\I IAY City,State,ZIP+4 NEW YORK NY 10024 PSForm 3800` une 2002 See,Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Service,. CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT ° co (Domestic Mail Only;No Insurance Coverage-Provided) For deliveryinformationvisit our website at www.usps.come ru QR i T, NnfY[i15 11 . L E rq Postage $ Q37 UNIT ID: 0744 O Certified Fee 2 z' Postmark Return Reclept Fee 1�� Here (Endorsement Required) I7 Restdcted Delivery Fee I Clerk: KBH3YX rl (Endorsement Required) ru Total Postage&Fees $ `4 02/07/03 Il-i CI Sent o D sneer apQRLEN_T___CEMEIERY orPOBox No. 23100 MAIN ROAD City,State.ZIPt4 ORIENT NY 11957 PS Form 3800,June 2002 See Reverse for Instructions -U.S. Postal SserviceTM N CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT w (Domestic Mail Only,No Insurance Coverage Provided) For deliverylivei nformation visit;our website at www.usps.coms ru o 0-13 ENT,�NYF14 [I G;1 L USE rg Postage $ . 7 UNIT ID: 0744 I=/ Certified Fee 2.71g° p �tJ Postmark p Return Reclept Fee ''77 Here (Endorsement Required) 1.L./5 Restricted Delivery FeeCler ■{C. KBH3YX ^ (Endorsement Required) 4.41 2 02/07/03 Total Postage&Fees nJ O Sent To ARTHUR SPANGEL r` Street Apt. Box o; or PO Box N 22950 MAIN ROAD POB 346 city,sfate,zlP+4 ORIENT, NY 11957 PS Form 3100,June 2002 See Reverse tor Instructions' ---\ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST Section Block Lot Name Address 18 2 21 Hopkins, William P. 2211 Broadway,NY,NY 10024 Baumann, Mary K 18 2 20.1 Jaworecki, Gladys 250 Youngs Road, Orient,NY 11957 18 2 9.1 Papantonio,Mr/Mrs Edmond L. POB 84, 55 Village Lane, Orient,NY 11957 18 2 10 Spangel,Arthur 22950 Main Rd.,POB 346, Orient,NY 11957 18 2 11 Orient Cemetery 23100 Main Road, Orient,NY 11957 t • c , LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY,FEBRUARY 20,2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS NOTICE is HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Chapter 100 (Zoning), Code of the Town of Southold, the following applications will be heard at public hearings by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold,New York 11971,on Thursday,February 20, 2003, at the times noted below(or as soon thereafter as possible): 1:20 p.m. Appl. No_ 5224- SPRINT SPECTRUM. LLP. This is a request for a Special Exception under Section 100-162A.1 regarding the proposed installation of telecommunications antennas inside the existing (church) steeple/building, located at 23045 Main Road,Orient;Parcel 1000-18-2-22.1. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives, desiring to be heard at each hearing,and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing.Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above.Files are available for review during regular Town Hall business days from (8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.). If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call(631)765-1809. Dated: February 3,2003. Southold Town Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959(tel. 631-765-1809). Sprint Spectrum L.P. Proposed Facility: Orient Congregational Church 23045 Main Road i Orient, New York r Section 18 Block 2 Lot 22.1 {II 31311I,• 'IV-ROPOSED SPRWT PCS , nx 011m1] • `V SECTOR ANTENNAS HI1II OF 3 SECTORS MI ,tSEE SEE DETAIL 3/Z9 LIITHI Iiiut.'iSI 92'-10'f 0.0 L Df , 59'-10'±AAL v�IN LL1I��NNIMi1m7 ;!' %OF ANTENMAS • PROPOSED FIBERGLASS- ' `f�1Il�l - REPLACEMENT PANEL SECTION �I 1� •' (FROM 6' ABOVE UPPER ANTENNA . I II - • TO 6' BELOW LOWER ANTENNA) EACH SECTOR ANTENNAS ���_'��'______ BASE OF STEEPLE L (T1P. OF 3) •� BASE SEE DETAIL 3/Z5 1/1111111.1 •• 1� UMW —1 PROPOSED SPRINT PCS CC'----ES ES DSI t�1q -- ARO E OUTING CHURCH: N _ 37-e•t a.c.L —� : BASE OF BELL TOWER PROPOSED SPRINT PCS CaAx caaLES RUN UPM COSTING CLOSET IDOIII11111I111IIIIIIIII111111 /I�I11/I�III/I�111/I�111�1�111 I-IIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111711 —IIIIIIIIOIII��/ItIpllllq�l11g111 1�!711 I�IIIIIII711t��� I�ptltltL': E)OSTINC ORIENT =17110/11111111111II1111II11 1111111111111111111111111I111O11101II/1 GREGADONAL CHURCH �111171t1I111111111I1111171 IIIIIIIIg11t11I11I11111t1IIIIIIII.,IIIIII,!III71II11II111111i11 PROPOSED SPRINT PCS 15UNDERGROUNDSTINU �t1111111ILI111111111111 11III1111I1111/I11111t1I11Itl1111t11111111111t1IItIt1I111t111�11111 COAX CABLES IN CONDUIT FROM E)LSTING �117111111111711t1_ 1111111I1111111IIII11111111I11/1111fI11111/111IO111'I11111LIg1l:11111111 ACCESSORY MIMIC:RE TO EXISTING �Itllina�idi3 — ItII1IlA1n�Ilmq�nn11ml11nul1nullunulnllnnulmra�nullnly CHURCH n111(no. h.Nri.n____J nnnnJltill.l•fl..1 n 1.11nl11n111_1iu1•IE.�.I _ �inio ilin'iiu.. � vAilk ====ti WIN. ■�■- _.�-� snnc dccFssdily ____m______-...._- _- _-!-� 'AL • 3,, ;4x,2,, t'%. �� �� �� uillnnllnn.. - - -� ---... ... � �� 1111111111111111111:`-,a'.:��" ~`ZrJ;`u'r,+ �� �� Iinlnngm111111m- s.y`:'.ta * m ` •--- 41111 —� 11111-11111 711.71--a"' ROP SEup5e171 @CSO DO �_��. AIM{III;I I CAgIESERONf,p ME$T{SEI . Iltll lulI PI11�I 1 'Lq•UND CRODUN�Ox64NOU(L7y I n • . . - _ I IIIIIIIII�I,11�1i,, Ilrllll- ESIIIP SE.DSSF(i1NR PCS• I g!'"•10110-!,-7.-7- ! ILIIII:LIIIIIIIIIIII'Pig EONPNENF SPACE I 1 _• IIIICIiIII u - 1 I I IG L 1 I I ' EAST ELEVATION 5 5 _L. • . • ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD:NEW YORK x In the Matter of the Application of AFFIDAVIT SPRINT SPECTRUM, LP OF SIGN (Name of Applicant) POSTING Regarding Posting of Sign upon Applicant's Land Identified as • 1000- 18 _ 2 _ 22.1 ---------------- x COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, VIRGINIA WOODHOUSE residing at HUNTINGTON , New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the 11th day of February , 2003, I personally placed the Town's official Poster, with the date of hearing and nature of my application noted thereon, securely upon my property, located ten (10) feet or closer from the street or right-of-way (driveway entrance) -facing the street or facing each street or right-of-way entrance;*and that I hereby confirm that the Poster has r,mained in place for seven days prior to the date of the subject hearing date which hearing da e was s •wn to be /A I Y , , I. (Signature) Sworn to before me this VIRGINIA WOODHOUSE it" day of /et.. , 2003. / \' bablX.) (Notary Public) NotaPublic,stateiooff NewYork • No. In Nassau 6 c O( Qualified in Nassau County �o Commission Expires August 18, *near the entrance or driveway entrance of my property, as the area most visible to passersby. MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & RE ATTORNEYS AT LAW REPLY To: 0 REPLY TO: d 160 MIDDLE NECK ROAD 36 NORTH NEW YORK AVENUE GREAT NECK, NEW YORK 11021 HUNTINGTON, NEW YORK 11743 (516) 487-6500 (631) 425-4100 TELECOPIER TELECOPIER (516) 487-6539 (631) 425-4104 February 18, 2003 VIA UPS Ms. Linda Kowalski,Administrator Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 Re: Sprint Spectrum L.P. Application to the Zoning Board of Appeals No. 5224 Public Hearing: February 20, 2003, 1:20 p.m. Proposed Wireless Telecommunications Facility Premises: Orient Congregational Church 23045 Main Road, Orient,NY 11957 SCTM#. 1000 Section 18,Block 2, Lot 22.1 Dear Ms. Kowalski: On behalf of our client, Sprint Spectrum L.P., we submit, herewith, the following documents: 1) Completed and executed Affidavit of Mailing for the captioned public hearing, including List of Property Owners and Certified Mail Receipts, together with a copy of the hearing notice and East Elevation Plan, which accompanied said mailing; 2) Completed and executed Affidavit of Posting. Very truly yours, MUNLEY,MEADE, NIELSEN &RE By: •'w .�_ A Doroth : - . u,Paralegal �• /db Enclosures ♦ w . --c"~ 14- I M,,,0,,,,,, .° I Revisions - 00-19-96 100° - 04-10-97 02-11-97 7. SEE SEC.NO.013 MATCH 7 LINE 01-14-97 "' T 01-14-98 N 742,200"' ,� < 01-20-90 0 //' "19-04-90C�Ov-10-96 \` 64%00-10-00 04-01-99 02-20-01 NN /�/OJ-05-01 / 6.8 � 6.18 '✓ �PpC� \5\.°C) $' 1.34 ��2.84 :44 .Yti /h 6.7 9 2.2A 4r Q' 619 ;F Q'° '4 °p 64, 1.4A '� tb Z �\ < 6.20 44 9.2 'Ay A 6.12 t4��ny 1.44 IP 3.04 ,P 1`;°� 1 54 �a\�l� 24 ° 3 A 'ai t •i a 'ib A3 44 A� •11.04(d ,9 S DSC- • �. 27 '2 6.13 4' $ ,E s 1.60 6.11 4,' o,� �''.9.: . rL<J '� *It 1260(c) a" 1.6A(c( 4 $+a <P WSG�O3 4* 18 11.BA(c) yb3 2.301C(r @" 2 44 _ 19 / 1 4 b' 2.3A(d <0 9.9 11.20(c) 4' 44 COUNTY OF c) .� y °r�. 0<0 2.AOd •a ZS6 (DEVELOPMENT RIC, 37.4 4 28 44 '16 tr 4 '>•" 4 4 4 4 '•a `Pj 2.18 .¢' '4.84 37.1 46 d q �'d 9op, 21 B4 �% 37.3$ 1.10(c1 °�' 26 2.34106 0 b 2.30(C( c 29 y, $ +° 2.4A '4.3 olo, 10 4 6 38.1 O 2.30(c)5., .30(c) r ,a 1.54(c) 1.54 4 '4 < cb 254. °0 3 o 4..• '� $ 2.44(c) '51 44 6 14 1.70(c) 104 1 ')' 11 'l0 2.OAlc) .T d> a 2.3A(c) 0 1 `s 16.20 4. 4 15 9 34 s' lop. ,a06 8� 3.3A4} 22.20(c) ,� ,L 12. �� 10 I. ® ° iN a 2 °�. .v6 b s ° 12.1 b ° o ,� `� .. a 7 .x, G °A 4 O 4 1� a*36 '<` .4`0 � a 3 '.., 4 6 8 4 tie' a 0 S m NA G 4•AP S a +� 6' °• ' 33 4 4127.90.(c) 4p AA, $ P R a a w J "� OYSTERPONDS 4t, r 16.5 ,�. 4 ty 32 t_• `3.1 3 5 c a 1.04(c) _ SCHOOL DIST. STATE OFA a 4�,ti S 5 t1 y{ Nal TORR a' 'Q L 4� ,' ;lit s :ao _ 24 4 so .4. 3�J u ¢ 4`` ' 01 ( 0 6.1 '� 1 1.9AIc> Ft 28 �' 4, . 4.2�' 10. sss ,■ s _ 23.1 'a" i, 4 1 ��° a�,Te_ f:9Ac) '�° 0-27 *° ,y41j. 18 s d .y 26 18.3 q ao 0 2.SA 9 ? 10M ;litNIE s 25 J t 4 w 40 21.1 4.1 11.5A(c) am oh fi .y ie OIUENT 162 18.4 •b 4 $ sN at CONGAEAT2VAL ‘11,4.+ 10.4 22 is CHURCH .h' o'° @ , �, l6 nn 0 22.1 ,y. 14019.6 RQ ° k 1.60(c) 3.7A 18.5 $s, ® 21 .1 ^ n 6 3.6A ilt, oo ENS ffi O e g 1 IA" 410 4j6 CEMETERY 1AP�c1 \`�P\�'S a• 6 A. 6 6 S 23 1 1 IA 6=. § 9.1 O 12 j PP t 4 B.O3 G j n D 5� aN 0 (o Q s JV °i 9.2 o so 2'' 13.7 d $ E ,,y7 d2. �e ,� 2.20(c) 2 z LINE N 736,400 ,m . d"1 I 1 MATCH Z • LWE .6e MATCH SEE SEC.N0.027 § c I a pc SEE SEC.N0.027 s9a4 pR,(k); Uno -_x-- UNLESS DRAWN OTHERWISE. ALL Bbmt Lied SUml0oMat too --001- o Melfi UNE WITHIN THE FOLLOWW. L PraDartr RI too S6mvMkn Lot tis ---•_ Fie Wetrkt Che -_F-_ Rd..@whit LNs -_N-_ scum. 2 SELO E Do 00)0 ms>mtI 0.0 -� 9emvlmm eka,®ww. (21) 30d,tb. O --t-- MwtorlalMah'kt Its --HST--- FAtE 2S HYDRANT E - later Wtrkt L6e LIGHT 4D TATER 1trt Lof ltre Pcsi Nod�as a ['"4 lis -- 048 Wtrkt floe --L-- A 609600 Llehkt llw•--A-- PAN( 65 REFUSE E sheen/Stere ��- sodoe m Tam tie --- Pok District Ile --P-- Tootevater @whit lie-WT-- AMBULANCE WASTEWATER. N ,,. ,,..,t... tet udl or]2.SA TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME : 02/05/2003 10:16 DATE.TIME 02/05 10:15 FAX NO./NAME 4254104 DURATION 00:01:04 PAGE(S) 02 RESULT OK MODE STANDARD ECM OFFICE OF yt • - )NING BOARD OF APPEAL! 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Email addresses: Linda.Kowalski a,Town.Southold.ny.us or Paula.Quintieri a,Town.Southold.ny.us http://southoldtown.northfork.net (631)765-1809 fax (631) 765-9064 FAX TRANSMISSION FAX# a c5-- 7/6 Cf ATTN: yy_11 ) A/J J , DATE: 2 / 6-/2003 REF: Gfe ' Sp -ink MESSAGE: XayaJ /14' >C c Please feel free to call if you did not receive all sheets. Town Hall hours are between 8 and 4. Thank you. Pages to follow: , OFFICE OF )NING BOARD OF APPEALS ) 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Email addresses: Linda.Kowalski(n,Town.Southold.ny.us or Paula.Quintieri(i,Town.Southold.ny.us http://southoldtown.northfork.net (631) 765-1809 fax (631) 765-9064 FAX TRANSMISSION FAX# V ATTN: alywww14,6, &i` DATE: ` a I (-/" /20Q i REF: c /_ ..''z` - i.. MESSAGE: G ae Please feel free to call if you did not receive all sheets. Town Hall hours are between 8 and 4. Thank you. Pages to follow: ‘\Q . P. 1 * * * COMMUNISATION RESULT REPORT ( FEB. 4. 200i 4:40PM ) * * FAX HEADER: SOUTHOLD SUPERVISORS TRANSMITTED/STORED : FEB. 4. 2003 4: 38PM FILE MODE OPTION ADDRESS RESULT PAGE 833 MEMORY TX 4254104 OK 7/7 REASON FOR ERROR E-1) HANG UP OR LINE FAIL E-2) BUSY E-3) NO ANSWER E-4) NO FACSIMILE CONNECTION OFFICE OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 53095 Mai, .load Southold,IVY 11971 Email addresses: Linda.KowaL4XdnTo�v�u,Suutl>�old.xey.ms or Paula. wintier:iaa,Town.Sot thold.ny.us ._ (631)765-1809 http=//southo1dtown.uorthfork.net fax(631)765-9064 FAX TRANSMISSION FAX# - lbs ATi`N: � .� ..�_&A�' . DATE: ' / t-t /206 REF; MESSAGE; Please feel free to call if you did not receive all sheets. Town Hall hours are between 8 and 4. Thank you. Pages to follow:�_ , LEGAL NOTICES::c.„ F•- . SSpU:TU LR .9-Mi •.'. ..,1.i • -, "' tFt �. STATE OF NEW YORK) c( nANI 1< . . -PUBLIC-HEAR GS"`'- • '• )S$: T H267 ofAlieSTEN;.Law`y QF SUFFQI_I� suant to Section 267 of fheToYn Law..r and:Chapter l00•(Zoning);Codeof•fhe e,•03,e ,t/>t/CU�.d ,<____of Mattituck, in said liTo ;of Sopliid,,ihe,�glfQngP ► '; county, being duly sworn, says that he/she is SOUTHOLD lT be '' •RP" Principal'Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly r SOU'I'HOI,D .3'O�JN�- 911 .� p nlaAi ac the Torn Hail;'5095`.: • • newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of ' - • 'Main•hoed,•Soiitlibld 16 20 rk Pl9aJhe Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, on Thursday, January 16,2003,.aj;;he,,, times noted below(orassoon;ihereftef' and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed ' 3.30 p.m Appl No 5222 - Robert copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper I and Barbara Holley.This is a request a once each week for weeks succes- for a Variance under Section 100-33C, based on the Building Department's sively, commencing on the /7 day August 28,2002 Notice of Disapproval of r�6-� •• 2O .& . for construction of an acces'aory garage•' with a front yard setback at less than 40 • feet. Location of Property 1085 Bav Shore Rd., Greenport;Parcel'1000-53- rincipal Clerk i 3-13.1. � • 3:35 p.m.Appl No.5238-T.and A. �. / ‘ • . 1 Laoudis;This is a request fora Variance Sworn to.bef re me ti71$', ( _ under Section 100-30A.3,based on the Building Department's September 29, , day of G . 200oL. 11 2002 Notice of Disapproval concerning- 1 a proposed carport at eis 50lling F ���j - �0,y ,t ci- 1 1 which is proposed at less than feet , /N �'w`-v� from the front property line Location of LAURA E. BONDARCHUK ' Property:405 Kimberly Lane,Southold; Notary Public, State of New York Parcel 1000-70-13-20.35. No 01 B06067958 • 3:45 p.m. ! Qualified in Suffolk County Phil's Lobster House.(This Hearing is My Commission Expires l ec.24, 20.. i� limited to New York Town Law's stan- i dards pertaining to Use-Variances and , ;'fining Board's evaluation, questions, lland/or request for information pertain- I ing to a reasonable financial return on • this property) Based on the Building 1 Department's Notice of Disapproval , . issued November 13, 2001, amend- , • 1; ed/updated October 22,2002,applicant requests zoning determinations for:(a). \ 1- an Interpretation under Article XXIV j Section 100-243 to Reverse the Building Department's determination , r ' which states that the proposed addi- • - tion/alterations to an existing restaurant._ • establishment is'not permitted in a Residential R-40 District,or alternative- ly a Variance authorizing the proposed 1 , addition to the existing restaurant, a i nonconforming use in a nonconforming , building; and(b)a•setback variance is - also requested under Section 1Q0-244B for an addition to the existing building _1 '` which will be less than-40 feet from the • front property Eine., Location of ` •'' Property: Corner of the east side of ' I Kenny's Road and,the:south side of 1, `. North Sea Drive, Southold; Parcel 11000-54-5=22. i .,:. 4:55 p.m.Appl. No. 5224- Sprint • Spectrum LP.This is a request for a•• Special Exception tinder Section 100- • , 162A.1 regarding the proposed installa- tion of telecommunications antennas inside the existing (church) steeple/building,located at 23045 Main , i. Road,Orient;Parcel 1000-18-2-22.1. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives,desir- I • ing to be heard-at each f earing,andtor id desiring to'submit written statements f' - before the conclusion of each hearing. - Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above.Files are available for • review during regular Town Hall busi- r 1 1 I �V ___, II i S :„., „„ „_ __ INTER-OFFICE MEMO TO: Jerry Goehringer and ZBA Members / FROM: Office Staff DATE: October 17, 2002 SUBJECT: Review of Special Exception and Zoning Issues— Sprint Tower(Inside Church Steeple, Orient) Please find attached correspondence from the Building Department. App eptly, the Building Department will not confirm that the plan meets with zoning, andsi referrin to % the Board of Appeals to address during their special exception hearing, although Mr. Raalis states that do not appear to be any other zoning issues regarding the proposed construction. Please confirm whether or not the Special Exception may be advertised for the� December 5 2002 hearing calendar. The advertising deadline is November 5th. Thank y�. / / Encl: 2 /% VVVV RAI -4 er i� I°,�®�0UFFO14-coG 0 2 Town Hall,53095 Main Road p Fax(631)765-9502 P.O.Box 1179 ��ill Telephone(631)765-1802 Southold,New York 11971-0959 =�ollig *pa" BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 16, 2002 • Lawrence C. Re Munley, Meade,Nielsen &Re 36 North New Yoprk Avenue Huntington,NY 11743 Dear Mr. Re, In reference to your letter, dated October 11, 2002, all zoning issues will be addressed by the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals during their Special Exception hearing. At this time, there does not appear to be any other zoning issues regarding the proposed construction. If you have any questions,you can contact this department at(631) 765-1802 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully e , Darr o>�n Rads, Permit Examiner ✓ CC: File,ZBA 1 1 y-/ - h a r ' ` t , MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & RE ii ATTORNEYS AT LAW REPLY TO: ❑ :,7F—r,-7r--7 �., '—'77,----71-, � '�`-r r -;------1-1 REPLY TO: 160 MIDDLE NECK ROAD {Y t ly �� {j 1 �-1 4' i 1 36 NORTH NEW YORK AVENUE GREAT NECK, NEW YORK 11021 _ • '• `- , -'�._-' __ _ n, --" j, 1; HUNTINGTON, NEW YORK 11743 (516) 487-6500 { 1' 1 nnr > (631) 425-4100 TELECOPIER 1 1t t 1 [ 5 2002 (2,,, TELECOPIER (516) 487-6539 I i i (631) 425-4104 �.. __~ ` , October 11, 2002 - "�--- VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL AND FASCIMILE Mr. Damon Peter Rallis Building Permits Examiner Town of Southold Building Department 53095 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 RE: Sprint Spectrum L. P. Application for Building Permit Premises: Orient Congregational Church 23045 Main Road Orient,New York 11957 . Dear Mr. Rallis: We have been advised that the Building Department has issued a memorandum addressed to the Zoning Board of Appeals stating that our application will require a Special Exception Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Ordinance relating to wireless telecommunication facilities. Please confirm that no variances will be required in addition to the Special Exception Permit. It is my understanding that no public hearing will be scheduled by the Zoning Board of Appeals until such a determination is made by your office. Thanking you again for your courtesies,we remain Very truly yours, MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN&RE • By ZGtipience 0 A Lawrence C. Re LCR/lr /' �(',ik IP •„,„„..______� 41110 ING BOARD MEMBERS ,��,0 • •\S®SoilV Mit,,%-, �Q ENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. 0 Gy`; P.O. Box 1179 .�Q Chairman t ® ; Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 VC J % co ; Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANOWILLJ.CREMERS ; �'�� Telephone(631) 765-1938 KENNETH L EDWARDS `4,, a��/ Fax(631) 765-3136 MARTIN SIDOR - ,-I '�*V° PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD _ �` \ __ - ;1 1' \\k }\ 1 6 )2, \\j\ \\,,\\K OCI ' ' MEMORANDUM daJ I\.\, ��._ c 0- T: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals F: Scott Hughes, Senior Environmental Planner R: Sprint at Orient Congregational Church Application # 5224 SCTM #1000-18-2-22.1 D: 16 October 2002 The Planning Board discussed this project at the 15 OCT 2002 work session and is highly in favor of the proposed cellular installation at the Orient Congregational Church. It is felt that the concealment of these facilities is a most welcome alternative to putting antennae upon exposed poles. I thank you. $,% $OFFOL ® 4. � ®CO3 - 2 Town Hall,53095 Main Road p Fax Fax(631)765-1823 P.O.Box 1179 ydo •.... I�s' Telephone(631)765-1802 Southold,New York 11971-0959 r * `t►j�ai* BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 4, 2002 Lawrence C. Re Munley,Meade,Nielsen&Re 36 North New York Avenue Huntington,NY 11743 Dear Sir, As per our conversation, I am returning your building permit application, as it does not need a"notice of violation" from this office. Instead,you must file this application directly with the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. If you have an questions,you can contact this depaitment at(631) 765-1802 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully Yours on Peter Rallis • Building Permits Examiner CC: File FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY CF/ECKLIST FOR NEW PROJECTS LABEL APPL# v?o� ASSESSORS CARD (7 COPIES) NAME Al", .� CTY. TAX MAP (7 COPIES + 1) CTM# INDEX CARD (ATTACH OLD) TOWN dL-2- LIST ALPHA BOOK RESEARCH ALPHA COPY PRIORS SIX COPIES INSPECTION PACKETS COMPLETE REF: *,/,i �7pG%� UPDATED NEW INFORMATION l0/6e/D Z "glit) ��L�,5 N' V , ,/,ed/ 16/ 7-� CyAx„ !ll/ vim. 4 - ,1.4 Glr � s HevlsIons 06-19.96 09-16.97 _-.---'7----------.-• C 06-16-97 /-1:‘ .m• 12-11-97 4 OI-19-96 N Taxoo W • SEE SEC.N0.017 t SEE SEC.N0.011 MATCH -ZZ--LINE d MATCH L INE h. gyp -- ---- 50\ / N 0 17 0 I.OAfcl\�\6.19 1.4M0 , O a 7 7 22.1 6h 6.7 //Ar 6 s Q. 2.2A i-q) �0\AG 6� ,�9 617 s L3 , C)• \. • S 2.64fe1 16.6A(c) 1.54 6.12 \�'�<R NA 3.04 06. p0 , ..e • \ wvT1 24 J 4. • /. '+ 5 3.64 6.11 \, a *".\\k„.../// ../ \ M101p 7.1 ry % 12.6AIU 1.641c1 n) \`,V// 3 ._1 . 2.10. �Q. /4 11.06(c) ) 3� 3 ' +g 0 r a 23AIc1 y4 H .4\6 COUNTY OF SIM OLA 8 20 NDEVELOVYENT WLNTS1 1.7A(4) 19 6 Nc 2.3M1fU 5.9 9.B X37.4 6 y�$ 11.2Afe1 9.1AIU a $x]7.1 ` a 2B 2.3410 , STA Oi p y 2.1410 NE ruff ].Sd1U ,�. 16 i 21 s I.IA(U 26 a -0 N i s 2.3A(el 2.JAfU 1. y 6 JB 1 P 29 4u1101014 15 e L5A1c1 . 1.54 s O 2.4A 10 a�{l a 2.34feI S T 9 'SO 0 d AA, 25 l�\B 1 E s x 2 WOY 2.0140i 9 .._ 14 11.6 4- .y a.B11 6 '1620 9 15 2.7A(e) ,,3.34 .1, 74 *1.74(c.,/ L7AIU . 2) s . 22.2410 a 4 66n Cli • a°O�! 1% ® N 145 \4.OAIc7P ©3J 7.9Afe1 tp 4 36.5 OYSTEHPONDS ,I2 14 9 411 9 1.OAfel p ONION FREE ,y o by 62.34fU SCHOOL DIST. STATE OF NEM YOPof ,6y�. Se•• ‘, 1 9 @ 29 y TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 4 . x 231 1 914 � .g 46 4.2 9• 5 84860PAIENT R Nm '61 E 16 5 12.9Afe1 y s' .q g' 26 19.3 Z I,6T SO.SAfU p 10 .9411 s 3` 0 2.SA . ro Mir rt m 19 4.1 - VVVj).,./ go•I �' �O• a' c M 31.54fe1 on6NT +'P cwc)tEAiwxpt 16.2 vtit18.9 o o On14a ..... w 16.1 2.90 "'ilk L6Afc1 .. 14.1 .S.i 0 /� 7� S. 3 zu• T; .. 16.6 m ' // - 37A 19.5 00 (� f/ -y MAIN oa�ENi1 O q 3.64 m m zfi.e $cEMETEMY 6 5 " 2.04fe1 �' j�� cYy 4AAt F�F'ka p1SSW� , /�/�1{y/1�//y,1''/1l1' 11101111§ �g 0 e.O23 Alc) 4' 27 V' B 2 n - Y A 13.T a m m 2fA(c) / N»e..00Ql c .a 5 2.2AfU 9 6 m ��a-�� � _A/J N % MATCH--Z- UNE s Z6.9 o MATf3i -�- LO,� 22 e- �- V yo m -_ 4(SEE SEC.NO.027 SEE SEC.N0.027 ( OFFICE OF 4 i -- BOARD OF APPEALS _i, Southold Town Hall N\ : 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 7( -1F.23- .4,,-10, 94), 765-1809 tel. r 765-9064 ZEA fax. ink***RYt********flr****AAA Ak**** **k********k****A*AAA****** *k********#nkat A•i.AA**A***A'*AA*7kkknlyk*** REPLY FORM , Dated: 7,17.os 0 5-a2•2 4S� • TO: iffe.:d +(&..4z,...t_ �� 1)(Ldc,:e ac 2., ( ) Your application is incomplete for the reasons noted below. ( ) It is requested that the following be forwarded as soon as possible (within about 7 days, if feasible). The advertising deadline is 22 days before the meeting date and the information is necessary for review and advertising purposes. You may forward the information by fax at 765- 9064, however, please send the original by mail. Thank you. ( ) The appeal was not filed within 60 days of the decision of the Building Inspector. (),4, Missing information - please see missing information checked below. Please submit all the documentation, together with information noted below. If you have any questions, please call us at 765-1809. Thank you. Information requested: ( -Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Inspector after his/her review of this • particular project map o�e p , / a - a � cam. q ,1�.� h -- 01 c L- x 0, ) CLp/ ( ) Check payab a to the Town of Southold totaling $ o I • ( ) Signature and notary public information are needed. 4 ✓ ) - = • • - ---- • - _mere not'inclucred. .) ( ) Setbacks must be shown for the subject building to all property lines, with preparer's name. ( ) Six (6) sets of a diagram showing the doors, number of stories, and average height (from natural grade). ( ) Ownership Search back to April 23, 1957 for the subject parcel and all adjoining parcels, certified by a title insurance company, and insuring the Town for$25,000. ( ) Copies of all current deeds and tax bills of the parcels back to (4 Other: .tutoe.: o u� Jr -'w► _ c L9 a jj, 0' -e-U �awe.JA fI'raY,ti g#61. Pi • PROJECT INFORMATION F 1. SCOPE OF WORK: THE INSTALLATION OF 11'-6"X20'-O" EQUIPMENT ROOM, REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF 3 PANELS ON THE EXISTING STEEPLE W/ 3 NEW Alliiik. INT SPFCTIeUM FIBERGLASS PANEL SECTIONS & INSTALLATION OF 6 PANEL ANTENNAS BEHIND NEW FIBERGLASS 2. PROPERTY OWNER: ORIENT CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH o I--). UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST, NEW YORK --------....."6".F. spi TIM FROST 617-216-9400 23045 MAIN ROAD S ORIENT, NY 11957 MODULAR CELL R E 3. SITE ADDRESS: 23045 MAIN ROAD ORIENT, NY 11957 N 13 3 X C 7 zI I rl 2 3 • '` 5 AI1 R • A D 9 0 R 0 E N T 9 N Y 1 1 9 5 7 4. DISTRICT: 1000 SECTION: 018 BLOCK: 02 GENERAL NOTES: LOT: 022.001 1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. ZONE: R-80 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS,- EX,:�i'iIV1 UIMEI'vs:ONS & LATITUDE 41'08'35" CONDITIONS ON THE SITE. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTY SPRINT REPRESENTATIVE IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIE BEFORE LONGITUDE: 7218'04" PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. FAILURE TO NOTIFY ?PINT 5. AREA OF CONSTRUCTION: 230 SQ. FT. INDOOR AREA REPRESENTATIVE PLACES THE RESPONSIBILITY ON IE CONTRACTOR TO CORRECT THE DISCREPANCIES AT THE CONTRACTOR EXPENSE. 6. NO HUMAN OCCUPANCY 7. NO CHANGE IN BLDG. USE, EGRESS OR OCCUPANCY 3. ALL MATERIALS, WORKMANSHIP & CONSTRUCTIOPFOR THIS SPRINT 8, HVAC EQUIPMENT: CONDENSER OUTSIDE BLDG ON PAD, PCPs FACILITY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TH.C.1,1PRENT PREVAILING STATE, MUNICIPAL AND/OR COUNTY BU: NG CODES, HVAC UNIT INSIDE ROOM , ZONING ORDINANCES, SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS REQUIREMENTS. 9. APPLICANT PROPOSES A 2-WAY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY, AND IT IS NOT INTENDED FOR PERMANENT EMPLOYEE 4. THIS SPRINT PCS FACILITY IS AN UNMANNED & =OURED OCCUPANCY. THEREFORE, POTABLE WATER, SANITARY SEWERS, EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION. THE FACILITY IS MONIT01I FROM A AND ADDITIONAL SITE PARKING IS NOT REQUIRED. REMOTE CENTRAL LOCATION. IT IS ONLY ACCESSED ',' A TRAINED 10. THIS FACILITY SHALL BE VISITED ON THE AVERAGE OF ONCE SPRINT PCS TECHNICIAN(S) EVERY FOUR TO SIX WEES. THEREFORE, A MONTH FOR MAINTENANCE AND SHALL BE MONITORED FROM THE FACILITY DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY WATER & WILNOT GENERATE A REMOTE FACILITY. ANY SEWAGE, EFFLUENT OR OTHER TRASH WASTE. 11. CONNECTION FOR ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE UTILITIES ARE 5. THE ESTIMATED VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION CREAT[> BY THE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. INSTALLATION OF THIS SPRINT PCS FACILITY IS 1 TIS' PER MONTH. ZONING REQUIREMENTS 0 REVIEW 0 ZONING 0 CONSTRUCTION THE AVERAGE DAILY TRIP GENERATION RATE (ADT) LESS THAN 0.07 ZONE REGULATIONS FOR R-80 FROM THE TOWN OF TRIPS PER MONTH. PROJECT CONTACTS SOUTHOLD 6. THIS SPRINT PCS FACILITY IS NOT GOVERNED BY LC_ULATION SPRINT: i 1. PLEASE REVIEW PLANS 3. INITIAL YOUR COMMENTS REQUIRING PUBLIC ACCESS PER ADA REQUIREMENTS _ 2. REDLINE YOUR COMMENTS IMPLEMENTATION ENGINEER: ZONE: R-80 DISTRICT: 1000 BLOCK: 02 LOT: 022.001 SECTION: 018 _ 7. THE PROPOSED FACILITY INCLUDES ONE SIGN IN Ar C '.(1ANCE WITH DEBRA WALKER 201-684-4125 FCC RULES ON RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSIONS 47 CFt 1.' G7 (B). LEASING AGENT: i _ I DIMENSIONAL REGULATIONS REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED REMARKS WI ED BRENNAN 973-783-1335 _.___., Terry Ptj___________771,, - ENGINEER I SITE LOCATION MINIMUM LOT AREA: 73,000.SF. NO CHANGE NAME INITIAL DATE 8. THE PROPOSED USE DOES NOT REQUIRE FULL-T�. OR PART-TIME ATTORNEY: EMPLOYEES AT THE SITE. MUNLEY, MEADS, NIELSEN & RE' Invi ,.cow N, Munn m o eW ,�r{�`' L �, A 9 MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 273'± NO CHANGE . 71,,,-F:,,,, ___7A ^-- S'` m'*,aPLFO�e �a y RF 9. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE FURNISHED AND WORHALL BE LAWRENCE RE' 631-425-41'00 ;,--Iii--" HEM "I' EAST MARION ' ,� I PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABL6_CTIONS OF THE g�VD p '^' BF =- ' 9 _ ENGINEER EC 0 ' I f-C SITE CONTACT: ACH ORIENT PARK � PRINCIPAL BUILDING ATTACHED SPECIFICATION NO. G-0 1, "TECHN CAL'__ IFICATIONS FOR ORIENT NAME INITIAL DATE TIM FROST 617-216-9400 I \� ��� °y J at ''�I CONSTRUCTION" AND NO. G-002, "TECHNICAL SPEICATIONS FOR z '^ I D pow. ��e` y CONSTRUCTION OF ELECTRICAL AND GROUNDING S'E.M". IN CASE OF BUILDING DEPARTMENT: n . Do. P .,,e MIN. FRONT YARD: 24'-2"f NO CHANGE Ai v 19 3 � m es*<' r CONSTRUCTION CONFLICT BETWEEN THE CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICALS AND THE SOUTHOLD EAST A R I O N 4"0��<6� MANAGER DRAWINGS, THE DRAWINGS SHALL GOVERN. IN TH;ASE OF CONFLICT �� R/STOR/GL m■CENTRAL ' V20'e p, SOCIETY R CEM. Orient Y.C. F I MIN, ONE SIDE YARD: NAME INITIAL DATETELEPHONE COMPANY: 22.5'f NO CHANGE BETWEEN SSLP STANDARD PRACTICES AND EITHERIE CONSTRUCTION 0 I AND SPECIFICATIONS OR THE DRAWINGS THE SSLFTANDARD P.S, 9 VERIZON why Rc oPRACTICES SHALL GOVERN. n HQ � G ' F KING • F 0�r I ;6" ��N cEM. I4 - c�j°( MIN. BOTH SIDE YARD: 45' 240'-10"+ NO CHANGE REAL ESTATE �`�I �, 5 °4mo foP �� �� ) 'g MANAGER 10. FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DETAILS SEE ACIPANYING ELECTRICAL COMPANY: ) o9C 1 , 0 R I Ei N • .T ,S sT NAME INITIAL DATE DRAWINGS. LIPA 9 NURrxu -,..,.0 dta`ypv To9Q° KING MIN. REAR YARD: 75' 159'-2"t NO CHANGE `11P�4:4:A,0-&,44‘.'' ;' + ` CIVIL STRUCTURAL NOTES: Yv'w i �. oT aJ I 3 MAX. NUMBER OF STORIES: 1• N/A 9' ► H A R B O R W=/� I 1. EXISTING DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE FOR REFERS. ONLY. INF` I 1 4 1 CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING (DITIONS, DRAWING LIST �`` I MAX. BLDG. HT: 35' 76'-8"± NO CHANGE DIMENSIONS, AND ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO QTADTINNY WORK. 0E� `" PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE BLOCK KSUS678AZO1 COVER SHEET oo Browns MAX. % LOT N/A NO CHANGE 2. ALL STEEL WORK SHALL BE GALVANIZED AND ,,, 'ITH :s Pt I SOUTHOLD COVERAGE BY BLDG: THE SPECIFICATIONS. �__ Peters Neck P� KSUS678AZO2 TAX MAPS & PROP. OWNER'S LIST 'SMELTER lSLAIWD - , I _�I / 3. STRUCTURAL TUBING MEMBERS SHALL CONFORM D aSTh p500, KSUS678AZO3 SITE PLAN I 1 s.. MAX. % LOT N/A NO CHANGE i\/ \ °4:' COVERAGE BY ALL: GRADE A. KSUS678AZ04 CONSTRUCTION PLAN Hay Beach'P� .,',_..:;:,.;,:',:,: .: ..:_ OWNER 1 • 0_,° '• .'c;'' OA NAME INITIAL DATE .4 q 4. ALL WELDING SHALL BE DONE USING E70XX ELEOODES AND WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO AISC AND AWS DI.I, VIRE FILLET WELD KSUS678AZ05 ELEVATIONS 8c ANTENNA DETAILS ,� ASN 9 cfr• -=F �� ' i UP ` . " - LoNG g I NOTE: 4.111,.C.‘0: 1 o5f44 UPON THE SIGNING OFF THE PROPERTY, OWNER GIVES THE UTILITY SIZES ARE NOT SHOWN, PROVIDE THE MINIMUM SIZER TABLE J2.4 V4 ` B`a I COMPANY ACCESS TO ANY AND ALL EASEMENT INFORMATION, IN THE AISC MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION", 9 EDITION. ,,;.<27?-1,Js WO , Long Beach Pt y REPAIR GALVANIZING AFTER ALL WELDING IS COMPL! ALL WELDING ��� REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE INSTALLATION OF ALL SPRINT PCS SITES. SHALL BE DONE OUTSIDE. NO WELDING IS ALLOWED ;IDE THE CHURCH. SITE LOCATION MAP N.T. 5. BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL USE BEARING TYPE\LVANIZED ASTM A325 BOLTS (3/4" DIA.) AND SHALL HAVE A MINIM OF TWO BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. , �s-' g . m(A, ' i= i . f4, { -'`� , �_ 4 08.22.02 FOR ZONING CROSSROADS CORPORATE CENTER U ��� ` �f4�'� A;�G 2 1 2002 �r 0 RutectA ' 1 t ORIENT CONG. CHURCH Sprint 3 08.02.02 FOR REVIEW1 INTERNATIONAL BLVD. SUITE 800 PCS„=�. - MAHWAH , EDWARD H. HERBST, RA, PP DATE: GARYlatkA110, 2" `', PP DATE: 23045 MAIN ROAD 2 02.26.02 FOR REVIEW NJ 07495 Architects/Planners NJ RA C-5177 NJ RA C-8�•~: %421 6.t EXAS RA 15417 �� . ORIENT, NY 11957 1 09.20.01 FOR REVIEW 240 CEDAR KNOLLS ROAD NJ PP 3387 NJ PP 4351 FL RA 14044INDOOR EQUIPMENT AND ANTENNAS N AS SUITE 209 PA RA 011184-B NY RA 021687 RI RA 2030 SECTION 018 BLOCK 02 COVER SHEET CT RA 7547 OHIO RA 10925 f�0.: DATE: ENS Atik SITE NO. NY33XC678B CEDAR KNOLLS, NJ 07927 VA RA 8254 DC RA 6052 LOT 022.001SCALE: PROJECT IvER: DRAWN BY: JOB No. DRAWING NUMBER DATE: REVISION TELEPHONE 973-538-3815 MA RA 10131 MD RA 11039 FAX 973-538-4095 FAX NOTED JWS MA S678A S678AZ01 09.12.01 0 . _ - ... v.+7Pls....�.. n:,-x-... ,:..itK- .......-..--.- ..-rte.`- .;,a--"-"T,... ..^• v. _, +C^.:..±s.4'K... - r..:r n....-,-y,w.- ;e _ +z7� ' + ''iw.c,+ "; `>;...+n.wwAx«.. w'->1r+.'..,m.=ri. I - ir 441\r a FOR THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -*/ tI ` ' ill . SECTION BLOCK LOT NAME ADDRESS 4 P'row 14_. 18 22.1 ORIENT CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH PO BOX 425, 23045 MAIN ROAD, ORIENT, NY 11957 Wiliti(•�� / I 18 23 HAFT, DAVID & EDITH 35 SANDY HOLLOW DRIVE, SMITHTOWN, NY 11787 111 ,,��y�y. �. :� la 1 SITE LOCATION 40 / ! OC TION1. 18 23.1 OYSTERPONDS UNION FREE SCHOOL 23405 MAIN ROAD, ORIENT, NY 11957 tç018 21 HOPKINS, WILLIAM P & BAUMANN, 2211 BROADWAY, NEW YORK, NY 10024 ... �/ i MARY WV"I.4V �'g (� • z 18 20.1 �, �� �. ` JAWORECKI GLADYS 250 YOUNGS ROAD, ORIENT, NY 11957 srittN � ` ,,, r1r t3 R 80 18 19 GLORIA, ROBERT YOUNGS ROAD, PO BOX 176, ORIENT, NY 11957 IL � '"�idel.‘1111:. , 1‘'40 -22111111111t4 IIIIIa Lill 1171 18 18 SOITO JOSEPH & WF 500 YOUNGS ROAD, ORIENT, NY 11957 .nt mob i =MI■ 1 18 2 17 GLORIA ROBERT E BOX 176, YOUNGS ROAD, ORIENT, NY 11957 V iNIM of. ir e - 3s ���� ,.,` _ AN : 18 1 14 BLESCH EDWIN J JR. PO BOX 430, ORIENT, NY 11957 • ,�*,.ro - '. 18 13 SLOAN ARTHUR W & WF 341 FURNACE DOCK ROAD, CORTLANDT MANOR, NY �► . %�1 ,`•� � Illi - - 10566 r. '�s i 18 12 UTZ & SUSAN PARK 295 YOUNGS ROAD, PO BOX 166, ORIENT, NY 11957 it i M./ph • \, ow� '� 18 1 11 KING ROBERT B 425 YOUNGS ROAD, ORIENT, NY 11957 4 4 .� V po�� �. �. . , 18 1 9 KING, ROBERT B & ANDREA V 425 YOUNGS ROAD, ORIENT, NY 11957 •R+ ,111/101 $ \� 18 • 8 KING, ROSCOE C 425 YOUNGS ROAD, ORIENT, NY 11957 t 4\.. R^80 18 5 MUDD, JONATHAN M & NORINE E 22540 MAIN ROAD, PO BOX 368, ORIENT NY 11957 JO *44 „�' 18 5 6 KING, JEFFREY C & CLAUDIA J PO BOX 69, ORIENT, NY 11957 Il �, ^`-* ':R.:200. 18 5 7 CONSTANT, DOUGLAS & ORS 555 VILLAGE LANE, ORIENT, NY 11957 :jell i lir-11.1 01:- I: IMO V % ,. 18 5 8 TABOR, WENDELL & WF PO BOX 285, 195 VILLAGE LANE, ORIENT, NY 11957 189.1 PAPANTONIO, EDMOND L & WF PO BOX 84, 55 VILLAGE LANE, ORIENT, NY 11957 18 9.2 TABOR JANET VILLAGE LANE, PO BOX 22, ORIENT, NY 11957 ZONING MAP I\ .T.S 18 10 SPANGEL, ARTHUR 22950 MAIN ROAD, PO BOX 346, ORIENT, NY 11957 18 11 ORIENT CEMETERY 23100 MAIN ROAD, ORIENT, NY 11957 18 12 LATHAM, DAVID & ELIZABETH L PO BOX 576, ORIENT, NY 11957 ___ __ _ __ —___.._____ -__ C 0 G R LATHAM JR. 18 5 13.8 ORIENT FIRE DEPT. 23300 MAIN ROAD, ORIENT, NY 11957 37.a 2.341U 4 211 -a, .. A( 3 �+ 2.lAtU •* 3%., i 37.1 LIMO 21 J • 2.3Atc) 2.:tct 6 38.1 O ,s LSAIU • 15A +, 2-uuU a ti j 1 V v 2.OA(c 11 < tik .` '` 2.3.44C) 16.20 15 34 0 3.3A 22.2.41c)t 104 110 121 O4 10 • -- o SITE LOCATION14 .P. , ., - 40 . ... 1,0 33 ?Mac),. `fir z+" OTS7EgPOtOS to ICS utaoa FkEE 1'' I,DAtct SdtOQ oat MITE!r • . Kt TM \1400 �ZOi(lik r 211 L24 ) 1 ` 12.9-1(c)f Ni- ..-- Wir = 76 s8.3 Na 25A o , 12 s tilt r 30 8 of in to,N, 2s3 20.1 �/!T ` Ib.a <. N COiattaiON4 • c wArot, i 2.3A ZZ 1! u 22.1 16.G e 21 S tats . ibit ' I 4 -. , 17A 185 , : O 3,6A ON is. Y a,crrt �e , a x 1 2 A.1_l ,� CP 9.1 16 n• :2 ; cH� ` . • FI3.., „r 2 1 "41 II r':... ...••-•----- , tt52 2Alct r. __ •u•�E. o�`'�+1 I ! tura �t ,x bisrcr "_— SEE SEC.,YJ.027 SCE SEC/ M TAX MAP SCALE: -1 "--200' 300' POPETY OWNERS LIST _ _ . : _: -_ .,.,._ _.. -,... �.,._ - ;r_ .�. �_ _.. .,ham= _ ,. .: � .. _ . � _ •�«,-,: . ,. 1 .-..-7,• ., y4Uset_l't * rr . , 'ia AUG 2 1 2002 CROSSROADS CORPORATE CENTER hilentet 0 Piltneetent $ � , ' I 3 08.22.02 FOR ZONING 1 INTERNATIONAL BLVD. SUITE 800 ORIENT CONG. CHURCHSprint PCS q • M AH WAH, N J 0749 5 • DAA: o.• A P P DATE: 23045 MAIN ROAD 2 02.26.02 FOR REVIEW Jkrcht 1 EDWARD H. HERBST, RA, PP g , , yJ NJ RA C-5177 NJ RA C—�� 8>€ �t TEXAS RA 15417 ORIENT NY 11957 1 09.20.01 FOR REVIEW 240 CEDAR KNOLLS ROAD NJ PP 3387 NJ PP 4351 FL RA 14044 INDOOR EQUIPMENT AND ANTENNAS TAX MAPS & PROP. OW\ ER'S LIST SUITE 209 PA RA 011184-B NY RA 021687 RI RA 2030 SECTION 018 BLOCK 02 CT RA 7547 OHIO RA 10925 SITE N 0. N Y33XC678B NO.: DATE: REVISIONS CEDAR KNOLLS, NJ 07927 VA RA 8254 DC RA 6052 LOT 022.001 SCALE: PROJECT MANAGER: DRAWN BY: JOB No. DRAWING NUMBER DATE: REVISION TELEPHONE 973-538—'3815 MA RA 10131 MD RA 11039 FAX 973-538-4095 AS NOTED JWS MA S678A S678AZ02 09.12.01 0 NOTES: FLS 1. THIS SITE PLAN IS BASED ON A SURVEY PROVIDED BY PECONIC 0.3%V SURVEYORS, PO BOX 909, 1230 TRAVELER STREET, SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 JOHN MATZGER, L.S. LICENSE #49618 DATED SEPTEMBER 20, 2001. O FE ~""..._ s Ys j 2. THE PROPOSED FACILITY WILL BE UNMANNED AND WILL ONLY BE s o2'w �+. X736��,, TER FD( SUBJECT TO PERIODIC MAINTENANCE VISIT. \r CO J.1------_______ _..1� �N�ON F/ 3. ALLNMATERIAL ACCORDANCEALL WITHBE THEURNISHED APPLICABLE DS CORK T ONS OFLL THE ATTACHEDE ED E Sc OOH INSP CCASIEATION OF CONOFLICT ROEQUIREMIEINTSTION SH SHOWN ONO THER DRAWIN. NGS \^ Cv i CA/Am, , D/ST SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. V� = PROPOSED SPRINT PCS _ GPS UNIT MOUNTED TO EXISTING STAIRS TO------. EXISTING ACCESSORY EXISTING STEEPLE BASEMENT `-----�__� STRUCTURE N _` TAN PROPOSED SPRINT PCS ALPHA 60' SECTOR ANTENNAS _ (TYP. OF 2) EXISTING ACCESSORY— ;, - SEE DETAIL 3/Z5 STRUCTURE -� �� ik I // ,\ I - EXISTING WOOD 'MEW PROPOSED FIBERGLASS PANEL EXISTING HVAC UNIT 10 STRUCTURE © 13' .8,417 I � SECTION (FROM 6" ABOVE UPPER 1/4 REMAIN PROPOSED SPRINT - N/�/ ANTENNA TO 6" BELOW LOWER PCS GAMMA 240' - 7 - - 7 - ANTENNA) © EACH ANTENNA EXISTING ACCESSORY SECTOR ANTENNAS �/ `� LOCATION (TYP. FOR 3 SECTORS) TYP. OF 2) ; / !. BUILDING SEE DETAIL 3/Z5 �■t PROPOSED SPRINT PCS 7/ �,\� PROPOSED 6"X4"X1 "X1 4" BENT / \ 2 O POWER AND BATTERY / 1 \ / STEEL PLATE BOLTED TO CABINETS EXISTING WOOD STRUCTURE 20'-O" , CENTER WALL ON LINE OF EXISTING , CENTER LINE OF BELL TOWER BELOW 1 W/ 1/2" LAG SCREWS EXISTING SANITARY LINE EXISTING GIRDER TRUE NORTH PROPOSED SPRINT PCS BETA - -[6'] - -. _ 150 SECTOR ANTENNAS V,''�\ I 'ROPOSED 3'-0" ACCESS 3STELI/A\ TE\ \ A PLAN (SEETYP DEOTA L)3/Z5 ��!� aOWER BATTERY I FUTURE DOOR SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" ��JJ C 481NET CABINET I BATTERY ( Iltt: +- 4 ( .1411C;4 1 i CABINET 6,1„, PROPOSED SPRINT PCS - - _ A/C CONDENSER UNIT - MOUNTED ON PROPOSE �I EXISTING STUD WALL CONCRETE PAD ( '-5_;')j 1PROPOSED SPRINT 3'-0" PCS ANTENNA COAX PROPOSED SPRINT PCS 6" - ~ CLEAR - - - - _a CONDUITS UNDERGROUND FROM ____ ' CABLES EXISTING ACCESSORY BUILDING __ Mc 6NET CELL EU RCAeIC U A "1000 CELL TO EXISTING CHURCH 7ABINET /3 ' 1\r- / A J t114,:)_) • ,—, EXISTING BELL TOWER I V V I 741;11 ,:1 \_____ ____ _ ( t0 ''.1 _II I _ _•_ PROPOSED SPRINT PCS 12" /,, / �� COAX CABLE LADDER I 1 1 \ LINE OF EXISTING STEEPLE I OUTLINE OF EXISTING EQUIDV =NT OOIV PLA\ ABOVE --------------------------...1 1 111 - CHURCH BELOW I SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" I I - 71 \ \ /// _ .- -__ -- - ---- \�\ / EXISTING BELL 14 EXISTING BELL TOWER ; EXISTING EXHAUST FAN TRUE NORTH ACCESS HATCH 1 Id 1 61 61 a - /1 BELL/2TOWE" R PLA\ 0 SCALE: 1 ©QI � EXISTING ACCESSORY j`'-• '-1 BUILDINGciI Ci - - - -- N PROPOSED SPRINT PCS 6"PVC CONDUITS FROM 11` — of �" �4 , z EXISTING CHURCH I �..__ « _ ___.._=U r 6. •--; BASEMENT TO EQUIPMENT PROPOSED SPRINT PCS I�I I POWER I I III II ACCESSORYROOM IN ISTING STR STRUCTURE UNDERGROUND CONDUITS �` N CABINET BAEIN T 1 IFUT CABINET I R,, ar I` _ __ o.�____ I PROPOSED SPRINT PCS \ - "--" ` ,� ;® so;;" EQUIPMENT ROOM ,.-` PROPOSED SPRINT PCS / CABLE LADDER EXISTING STAIRWAY �d1��3/4'7-31 J�- // III 2'-3-9/16" 2'-3-9/16" 2'-3--9/1G 1'-9" / 9-3/8�' 9-3/ . GRADE---N // N OUTLINE OF EXISTING 1�I ` // CLOSET ABOVE ON FIRST 3-3/4" 3-1/8" -m_i- _ r ( !«I PROPOSED SPRINT PCS �'�1n �' '� 1� BATTERY/POV1iER-ER AME r--FLOOR ti � -� �. i i..." 1'-11-1 4" 1'-7-7 8" ',` "-i1- ` PROPOSED SPRINT / 1'-8" / 1'-7-1/4" a _, ( /� PCS COAX CABLES1.17-044111114*"."4:6-14 R IN EXISTING CHURCH / ' / `\�- I. /\ Z OUTLINE OF EXISTING CHU CH 2'-3-9 1 2 -2-13 16' nii urs CLOSET 2'-3-7/16" t u u I '`' r c 6-9/16" 8-3/8" 8-1/2%' i� iii iii / rr `I114111 (1-=4;-, !%i���4 / PROPOSED SPRINT PCS _ 6wr., /-Zr' =`, 114"10`��.��� iu in , .r �� EXISTING ORIENT COAX CABLES TO RUN j 1 I ( 1 � / \a �`I��� ABOVE CEILING IN CHURCH r _T CORE DRILL ALL CONDUIT -1 - �r (TYP. OF 12) _ - PENETRATIONS AND SEAL I 11 CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH __ �_ I1 ' I _10 I I 17 I CO "' MODULAR CELL y -1 Nig FUTURE PROPOSED SPRINT PCS PRIMARY —__L--, I 11 J co �� 1 CABINET #1 1 n FUTUR MODULAR I DULAR CEL MODULAR CELL CABINET ``I' // _ ? I 1 CEL_ �AIBINET2 I CABINET #3 / ]- PROPOSED SPRINT PCS / PROPOSED SPRINT .c~' -s to F� 071-079P --®„ GROWTH CABINETS // Id PCS ANTENNA COAX - i II SEE DETAIL 5/Z4 `J L Ill CABLES UP INTO L J_ J I BELL TOWER to IN MAIN ROAD - TRUE NORTH < i Y CLAN CD N.2 CARL RO ., TIING PLA\ CABI \ ET V10U \ TI \ G DETAIL6 -QUIPV -\ T . 00V ISOIUETIC SCALE: 1 "=1'-0" / SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" N.T.S „S��. Mtl`st, l& 4 08.22.02 FOR ZONING CROSSROADS CORPORATE CENTER _ 1 INTERNATIONAL BLVD. SUITE 800 v A 2 1 20023 08.02.02 FOR REVIEWWilillieritrt /�.�' VT.,i:'1:,!-,,,,i;;i; ORIENT C O N G. CHURCH Sprint PCS.. � . �.'�'��:;:�.�� MAHWAH , NJ 07495 ht EDWARD H. HERBST, RA, PP DATE: GARY Ct111° RJJPP DATE: 23045 MAIN ROAD 2 02.26.02 FOR REVIEW � 1 NJ RA C-5177 NJ RA C-5” O2I6% yip /AS RA 15417 - 240 CEDAR KNOLLS ROAD NJ PP 3387 NJ PP 4351 of- ,yam RA 14044 ORIENT, N Y 11957 1 09.20.01 FOR REVIEW I - SUITE 209 PA RA 011184--B NY RA 021387 -- -« RI RA 2030 SECTION 018 BLOCK 02 INDOOR EQUIPMENT AND ANTENNAS EQUIPMENT PLA\S & DETAILS CT RA 7547 NO.: DATE: REVISIONS 416, CEDAR KNOLLS, NJ 07927 VA RA 8254 DCI RA 6052 10925 SITE N 0. N Y33XC678B TELEPHONE 973-538-3815 MA RA 10131 MD RA 11039 LOT 022. 001 SCALE: PROJECT MANAGER: DRAWN BY: JOB \o. DRAWING NUMBER DATE: REVISION FAX 973-538-4095 AS NOTED JWS MA S678A S678AZ04 09.12.01 0 • • Ili PROPOSED SPRINT PCS PROPOSED SPRINT PCS SECTOR ANTENNAS SECTOR ANTENNAS itlo TYP. OF 3 SECTORS TYP. OF 3 SECTORS PROPOSED FIBERGLASS � A REPLACEMENT PANEL SECTION SEE DETAIL 3/Z5 7 SEE DETAIL 3/Z5 (FROM 6" ABOVE UPPER ANTENNAimps lar‘ k TO 6" BELOW LOWER ANTENNA) © EACH SECTOR ANTENNAS 117111 62'-10"f A.G.L 1 ' /11 62'-10"f A.G.L (TYP. OF 3) :Vaal CL OF ANTENNAS I;; ', oP CL OF ANTENNAS SEE DETAIL 3/Z5 }r` - ''1 til ,1. A 1 111 ill, I i,II' ■.. 59'-10"± A.G.L "I I ....40.1, \ 59'-10"± A.G.L 1� CL OF ANTENNAS �' ® CL OF ANTENNAS I 11 4 1 i I PROPOSED FIBERGLASS ikt 111 11 1 iill 1 ' REPLACEMENT PANEL SECTION I� MI (FROM 6" ABOVE UPPER ANTENNA la -;�- TO 6" BELOW LOWER ANTENNA) © , 11 , A EACH SECTOR ANTENNAS ,- , _6• 1 ►'11►'a1►�/ 48'--6"± A.G.L (TYP. OF 3) I (Mir,t' ) �;•i, 48'-6"± A.G.L ' 14IIIF BASE OF STEEPLE SEE DETAIL 3/Z5 4 BASE OF STEEPLE � I i1M=�I �' �'-.—_ , PROPOSED SPRINT PCS COAX CABLES = 1 I�_j I _ II __ ABOVE EXISTING CHURCH ATTIC Ili-- ' ' � ' � I I ti • I �i,',1; 37'-6"± A.G.L r _ 1 37'-6"± A.G.L 61 PROPOSED SPRINT PCS COAX CABLES .. J II BASE OF BELL TOWER F=_ — BASE OF BELL TOWER RUN UP IN EXISTING CLOSET I I I � I. I ' , ' __- ■■ 1 Irl I_ 1 ImIr1�IrIr1 J I LI �■�n-n I' IIlhlr I 11�"' MEM I 1111111111 IIIIII1111Mr. PROPOSED SPRINT PCS UNDERGROUND EXISTING ORIENT ""���'�'���'�'�� °� - ' _ j EXISTING ORIENT - I lir 1L_.' ' ll II ' I I I�I�IrImlr COAX CABLES IN CONDUIT FROM EXISTING CONGREGATIONAL � IL�'I m' ACCESSORY STRUCTURE TO EXISTING CHURCH CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH —__ �� IIII 1I/Irlrl1lr I' a '� _�dra_ Irmo I I I�;�I�111111 Il1111 CHURCH a ,_,_ -- "1"11I _LiLl iMow 7 1L 1111111111111=11 4 Irl 1 / oon - u ,_,.. F--- — all I I 1 [111 lie b. � !!IILI! ' - ------- - - -- in- / im _ n _ ..._ i \ ( \ „, _.,., I ■ ACCESSORYEXISTING --^-- - - ■■ 4111. STRUCTURE — ■ m _ __ - ■ 'AII.IIII1►, nigiallil '• ___ ----- ! _ --�= IMI=Inil 1 PROPOSED SPRINT PCS COAX I INN II CABLES FROM EQUIPMENT SPACE I. TO UNDERGROUND CONDUIT Pi IRIDIUM”. IIIIIPI •� PROPOSED SPRINT PCS I -1111111111111111 EQUIPMENT SPACE _ _ I I L aiIIam GRADE GRADE I I I 111) I_ _ _ _ _ _I I \ � ) II L- ---- - - -I I i-- 41•14/ - I II I I I I I I II '� SO T— -L=NATIO\ -AST -LIVATIO \ SCALE: 1/8",=1'-0" SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" 1 , /:\ LE":41/ PROPOSED 2 1/2"c6 GALV. A STEEL PIPE 3'-6" LONG ' TYP PROPOSED FIBERGLASS PANEL 2 75" EXISTING CROSS \\\ t SECTION (FROM 6" ABOVE UPPER // BRACING ABOVE 13' , ANTENNA TO 6" BELOW LOWER PROPOSED 1/2" U-BOLTS ANTENNA) © EACH ANTENNA ff 2.75" / 8" / \ TYP. OF 4 PER CONNECTION LOCATION (TYP. FOR 3 SECTORS) • II :co ,` 11 `i.. _ r \ \. / ;'} PROPOSED 1/2" LAG SCREWS i� �� TYP, OF 2 PER CONNECTION TOP VIEW PROPOSED SPRINT PCS I " EXISTING WOOD BLOCKING AT �� N N c o / SECTOR ANTENNAS c _ 13'± ABOVE STEEPLE FLOOR 'It 1 --.'-,:11 _ V.LF SEE DETAIL 3 Z5 -,-. EMS WIRELESS OPTIFILL DUALPOL �. �� \ - ANTENNA MODEL RR651500DPL2 - - i , SPACE BOLTS TO ALLOW T WITH MECHANICAL DOWNTILT KIT • .i_�s ANTEKET NNA MOUNTING MODEL MTG-D10-10 I111 r +/ SIDE VIEW REAR VIEW "' ~ -�;- I. - \a, EXISTING WOOD BEAM -- e 1j° II PROPOSED 6"X4"X12"X1/4" P) °° 01 i BENT STEEL PLATE BOLTED III - TO EXISTING WOOD STRUCTURE WITH 1/2" LAG PROPOSED 2 1/2"0 I SCREWS GALV. STEEL PIPE EXISTING WOOD STRUCTURE =\ LAGGED A\ TE\ \ A - 13'-0"ABOVE STEEPLE N OU \ TI \ G _-TAIL i P.. FLOOR SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0" , 3 A\ T-\ \ A DE—AILA\ --\ \ A vOL \ TI \ G DETAIL r' , SCALE: 1/2",=r-0" 4 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" `C�°13 ARC. _ _ _. - - .. - >-- II.iiiiiii.ii1.1ft ft, u.: n., ... ., ...--.w,. ».-,-,�_...z-z_,.uir ... .:, r•M�.,.�„'�- ,x�` =.x.�+.Y` _, _ - - - r. ,.—rmr.F:x:;+++.,:wr.rie.: -r; `� CROSSROADS CORPORATE CENTER Herbst ,„, 1212002 1 INTERNATIONAL BLVD. SUITE 800 • .. <« � j ORIENT C 0 N G. CHURCH Sprint PCS 3 08.22.02 FOR ZONING �' A�� e M AH WAH , N J 07495 EDWARD H. HERBST, RA, PP DATE GARY �• i ► ���,, PP DATE: 23045 MAIN ROAD 2 02.26.02 FOR REVIEW Architects/Planners :.IF • NJ RA C-5177 NJ RA C-878 ERAS RA 15417 ORIENT, N Y 11957 1 09.20.01 FOR REVIEW 240 CEDAR KNOLLS ROAD NJ PP 3387 NJ PP 4351 FL RA 14044 SUITE 209 PA RA 011184-B NY RA 0216 7 RI RA 2030 SECTION 018 BLOCK 02 INDOOR EQUIPMENT AND ANTENNAS ELEVATIO\S & DETAILS • CT RA 7547 OHIO RA 10925 NO.: DATE: REVISIONS CEDAR KNOLLS, NJ 07927 VA RA 8254 DC RA 6052 LOT 022.001 SITE NO NY33XC678B SCALE: PROJECT MANAGER: DRAWN BY: JOB No. DRAWING NUMBER DATE: REVISION TELEPHONE 973-5383815 MA RA 10131 MD RA 11039 FAX 973-538-4095 AS NOTED JWS MA S678A S678AZ05 09.12.01 0 • _-.G- _- - _.. -. .... .. �.. '.:.....-... � �`'>''.}.j; Tt�:�Wr swisaw ...:.�xn r.,..�na.,:,.s s .,_: ... r -, .-..-- �.. _ ..e -r. .. _ '-W' ,�--::..� ..-...._ .-e�'�..-^-..... W.r,+3.�- ..__. -.meow -v .. ._ - ... ...<..vry ,.�,. .:..v. ._� .: vx> vr.- �.:+.._':w :.�- .._.:.:...:.. en.. -��# .,., .a��-�vr=rr-...;._.... ,.-..�_:». _v. - - -. - -- _-.. __^W4zSiT��-'�... .. - .. ... _. � .w.avr ,�q....._. �.... �..-..,m r ,.i:..:) v .,..n.^-;w:.eyMt..m^. a .. :..K:... .. x.-.s.+. r.., �:e�,....'w•n•-'.r uan r..-.x w. _. '�Y+,v:.-v e 2....n'-r-- vY.a27n.�, - ��h�a”-..�i.:.^r_.. - ..- snakm_rf.uieuuuv