HomeMy WebLinkAbout9809-z
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR
TOWN HALL
SOUTHOLD, ~. Y. I197!
TEL. 765-1802
July 24, 1979
Deputy Supervisor James Homan
Town of Southold
Town Hall
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Dear Sir:
This letter is in regard to some inquiries by Mrs. Csajko
about the building department and permits for additions to Jay
and Mary Thomson at 3605 Bay Shore Road, Greenport, Lot 64 of
Peconic Bay Estates.
On June 27, 1978, building permit #9809Z was issued for a
addition, and a certificate of occupancy was issued Sept. 1,
1978. Recently it came to our attention that this addition ex~
ceeded the permitted 20% lot coverage. This was not noticed at
that time that the permit was issued.
Another building permit application dated June 6, 1979, was
filed in this office. Before the permit was reviewed or issued,
an anonymous caller called to ask if a permit had been issued for
the construction started. The application was disapproved as the
building would exceed the 20% coverage permitted. The Zoning
Board of A~peals held a hearing on this appeal, #2561, on July 5,
1979~ Their unapproved minutes(~nclosed) says that they granted
permission for this second additzon with a total of 22.43% usage
of the lot. The minutes mention the building department's fail-
ure to disapprove the first addition which exceeded the 2~.
Yours truly,
GEORGE H. FISHER
Sr. Building Inspector
GHF:ec
Enclosures
· SOUTH~OWN BOARD OF APPEALS -10- July 5, 1979
//~PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2561 - Upon application of Jay and
/ Mary Thomson, 695 Bayshore Drive, Greenport,5~New York (George Ahl~rs as
Agent), ~or a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section
100-31 for permission to construct an addition to an existing house which
would cause the usage of more than 20 percent of the building lot. Loca-
tion of property: Bayshore Road, Greenport, New York, known as Lot No.
64, in Peconic Bay Estates, Greenport, New York.
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a
variance to the Zoning Ordinance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits
attesting to its publication in the official newspapers of the Town and
disapproval from the Building Inspector. The Chairman also read a letter
from the Town Clerk that notification by certified mail had been made to:
Ann Blitz and F. F. Csajko. Fee paid $15.00.
GLADYS CSAJKO: Before you get started, would it be possible for me
to obtain a copy of the application?
THE SECRETARY: I can make you one.
MR. DOUGLASS: There is a survey map attached with the small addi-
tion drawn on it, and how much area it will cover. There is also a
County Tax Map of the property attached. Is there anyone here wishing
to speak for the application?
MRS. CSAJKO: Excuse me, we have asked for a copy of the application.
Could we have it?
THE SECRETARY: I'm sorry I can't give it to you right now. Our
photocopy machine is locked in the Town Clerk's Office, and I don't have
a key for that part of the building.
MR. DOUGLASS: It would have to be done during business hours°
THE SECRETARY:
room.
I would glady do it for you if I could get into that
MRS. CSAJKO: I'm sure you would.
GEORGE AHLERS: I'm the builder. Mr. Hinderman when we first sub-
mitted the papers made an error in the total square footage of the house.
Actually the house only covers 22.43% of ~he plot. These are figures that
I have gotten from Van Tuyl's office. Because the existing house does
cover 2.43% more than it is supposed, we are asking for an additional
.91% in the form of an addition on to the existing house. We are demolishing
part of it, and then adding~on to it to give us the additional square foot-
age. I do not think this small amount of added footage on to the house
would change anything, be it the character of the neighborhood or anything
else for Mr. and Mrs. Thomson.
MR. DOUGLASS: Would you answer a couple of questions for us. When
we were. at the house looking it over it appears that it is not going to
protrude past the end of the house on the water end.
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -11- July 5, 1979
MR. AHLERS: No, we will be still 6 or 7 feet behind the existing
front line of the house.
MR. DOUGLASS: Is it going to be one or two stories?
MR.~.AHLERS: Two stories.
MR. DOUGLASS: Is there anyone else present who wishes to speak for
this application. (there was no response). Is there anyone present
who wishes to speak against this application.
FRANK 'CSAJKO: I do not want to speak against the application, but
against the procedure at this point. Can I be recognized?
MR. DOUGLASS: You can speak against it now if you want. Once this
hearing is closed you will not be able to speak against the application.
FRANK CSAJKO: Can I speak against the procedure before the applica-
tion is approved?
MR. DOUGLASS: You can speak right now against it if you desire.
FRANK CSAJKO: Can I speak on the questions?
MR. DOUGLASS: Yes, you can.
the record?
MR. CASJKO: I would like to
approved or disapproved.
Do you want this on the record or off
speak after the formal application is
MR. DOUGLASS: That is right now.
MR. CSAJKO: In other words you are going to hold it right now?
MR. DOUGLASS: Sure.
GLADYS CSAJKO: We don't want to speak for or against this.. We want
to speak on a question. We want on the record that we are not for or
against this.
MR. DOUGLASS: Okay.
MRS. CSAJOKO: But we do mot want anyone here thinking we are against
this°
MR. DOUGLASS: Okay, stand up and talk.
MR. CSAJKO: Question No. 1. According to the Bulk and Parking
Schedule the Town of Southold you cannot use more.th~n 20 percent of your
plot.
MR. DOUGLASS: That's right, not without a variance.
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -12- July 5, 1979
MR. CSAJKO: Exactly what percent of the lot will be covered if
this variance is granted?
MR. DOUGLASS: 22.43 percent.
MR. CSAJKO: You said 28 per cent before.
MR. DOUGLASS: As Mr. Ahlers just pointed out after Van Tuyl went
over the surveys there was an error in mathematics by the Building De-
partment.
MR. CSAJKO: Before I go any further how can you vote on a variance
where you have an error with the Building Department.
MR. DOUGLASS: We have our own figures too. We have our own adding
machines. We will go by the Sur~ey of Van Tuyls.
MR. CSAJKO:
MR DOUGLASS:
Then you do not go by the Building Department?
He can just be so accurate. He is not a surveyor.
MR. CSAJKO: Okay, what does Mr. Van Tuyl say?
MR. DOUGLASS: Mr. Ahlers, would you care to give him that?
MR. AHLERS: The existing house covers 2~43 percent more of the
lot than is supposed to be used. ~hen Mr. Hindermann first say the
survey, the front sidewalk appeared to be part of the house. Which is
why he came up with such a large percentage of the Coverage by the existing
house. The next day he called my office about it, and I went to Van
Tuyl and had Rod knock out the numbers on the calculator and he was the
one who came up with the existing coverage of 22.43. We are asking for
approximately .91 percent additional coverage of the lot.
MRS. CSAJKO: So what is your actual figure of usage of the lot now?
How much over the 20 percent are you going to be?
MR. AHLERS: It would be 3. something.
MRS. CSAJKO: No, give me 20. something?
MR. AHLERS: It would be 23.34 percent of the lot.
MR. CSAJKO: That is down on the Building Department's records?
MR. DOUGLASS:
My figures.
It is right here in front of me.
In my records.
MR. CSAJKO: Okay, now I have a couple of other questions at this
point. There was a what do you call it before the building was added on
making the building over-sized. Am I correct.
MR. DOUGLASS: I don't know what a what do you call it is sir?
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -13- July 5, 1979
MR. CSAJKO: When did the existing building become over-sized?
MR. DOUGLASS: Originally when it was buil~ prior to zoning.
MR. CSAJKO: Oh no, I object. I object. Because I owned that
building with my father-in-law, and I know exactly how big that building
was.
MR. AHLERS: I'm afraid that is a loaded question. Merely because
you would not know the answer to it and he does. We put an addition on
this house last for ~Lr. and Mrs. Thomson. It was not picked up by the
Building Department at the time that what we requested was going to put
the house over the percentage of usage allowed. In fact I do not think
it would have been picked up this time except that these folks were
performing a public service and advised the Building Department that
what we proposed to do would indeed violate the Ordinance.
MR. CSAJKO: You've got the floor George. (Mrs. Csajko clapping
in the background). Now can I go on with my questions? Mr. Ahlers
admits that the addition is illegal. Now, can I ask Mr. Ahlers a question?
MR. DOUGLASS: Through the Chairman you can.
MR. CSAJKO: Okay, Mr. Chairman. Was there a variance applied for
for the other addition?
MR. DOUGLASS: Evidently it was not considered over-sized when it
was put on.
MR. CSAJKO: Was there a variance applied for?
MR. DOUGLASS: It was never picked up like Mr. Ahlers said. It was
not picked~up as an over sized building.
MR. CSAJKO: Well, who goofed?
MR. DOUGLASS: It wasn't this department.
MR. CSAJKO: I know it wasn't your department. I'll admit that.
Now you are going on, you are asking for a variance to go over sized on
something that is over sized to begin with. Am I right or wrong?
MR. DOUGLASS: Well, sir, it appears to me what you are trying to
do is pick departments in this Town apart. Just a minute sir. Not
answering your direct reasoning to object to the project. I think you
should back off the departments and get in line on exactly what the
appeal is, and object to that if you desire.
MR. CSAJKO: Can I make a request that we have a hearing on the
variance for the first over-size and then go from there.
MR. DOUGLASS: We have no authority on that whatsoever.
never come before here.
It has
$OUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -14- July 5, 1979
MR. CSAJKO: It never came before this Board? There is no precedent
then whatsoever?
MR. DOUGLASS: I would not say so. I would have to check with
legal counsel.
MR. CSAJKO:~ Can we wait until legal counsel tells me if we can do
it or not?
MR. DOUGLASS: I can postpone it until then.
MR. CSAJKO: I would appreciate a postponement.,until legal counsel
can tell me whether we can go on with the second variance when the first
variance was not approved.
MR. DOUGLASS: There was no first variance.
MR. CSAJKO: I know there wasn't a first variance.
MR. DOUGLASS: Then how could it be approved?
MR. CSAJKO: You just told me you have to have legal counsel.
MR. DOUGLASS: I would check legal counsel before I would say you
would have to go back on that, yes.
MR. CSAJKO: I would like to make a motion at this point that you
get legal counsel to see whether we have to have another hearing or
if this can be approved tonight. I want to adjourn this hearing tonight
and find out whether the first over-sized building was legal or not.
Whether it needed a variance or not.
MR. TUTHILL: I object to any postponement of this hearing. We are
dealing with a specific question here and not with the past.
MR. DOUGLASS: That's true.
MR. CSAJKO: Excuse me ....
MR. DOUGLASS: On the other thing, I think you would find you will
have to go back ..... We are directly concerned with this appeal not with
something that did not happen. I think you will have to go back to the
Building Department and see if the Building Department wants to get in-
volved with revoking the original Building Permit before anything else
can be done. We can pass on this.
MR. CSAJKO:
about the past.
structure?
Can I ask one more question? I don't like the part
Has there been a permit to tear down the existing
MR. DOUGLASS: I wouldn't know.
That has nothing to do with us, sir.
line.
There hasn't been any through here.
You are totally getting off the
MRS. CSAJKO: We're just trying to find out...we are just asking
questions, that's all.
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -15- July 5, 1979
MR. DOUGLASS: Mrs. Csajko...
MRS. CSAJKO: Let's try and straighten this out. We personally have
no objections whatsoever to the Thomson's putting this in. What we are
bringing up right now is that an original building was put in which was
over-sized and for some reason the Building Department did not pick it
up and bring it to the attention of the Appeals Board. Now they are
coming up with a second over-size, which is perfectly legitimate. We
are making no objections whatsoever. Understand us, we are not objecting.
We are trying to bring out if there is any communication between this
Board and the Building Department? Is there any spot check to see what
the Building Department is doing? Now you have a case of an over-sized
building which was never picked up by the Building Department which should
have been.
MR. DOUGLASS: Let me answer that ....
MRS. CSAJKO: Let me finish what I want to say Mr. Douglass. We
have personal reasons and we discussed it and we did not do it in the
hopes of keeping friendly relationships between neighbors. We could have
when the first building was put in raised objections because we knew
damn well that the building was over-sized? You know this contributed
to my mother's death. The upset on this.
MR. DOUGLASS: Well, this ....
MRS. CSAJKO: Now, wait a minute. Please let me finish. What we
are trying to bring up tonight is are you checking with the Building
Department? Are there any other variances that are not being applied
for because the Building Department is not passing them along to you.
Now you gentlemen are being paid to act on variances. But you get them
from the Building Department. I am not in any way holding you culpable.
You have to work with the Building Department. Is there anyone from
the Building Department who advises you? How much do you talk to them?
Do you find out what is going on with the Building Department?
MR. DOUGLASS: Let me answer that this way. We are not an enforce-
ment agency. The Building Department is the enforcement agency. This
is not us that checks on the Building Department, the Building Department
checks on the variances that we issue.
MRS. CSAJKO: In other word~-, you are not in any way checking that
the Building Department is doing their job.
MR. DOUGLASS: When we ride around we see if they have or not.
MRS. CSAJKO: Well, you didn't know about this?
MR. DOUGLASS: Why should I?
MRS. CSAJKO; You just admitted yourself that you check on them.
Now we are in now way opposed to Mr. and Mrs. Johnson's application.
The only reason we came down tonight was because we have seen what has
happened next door where you have a case where the Building Department
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -16- July 5, 1979
did not report it at all. In the second case I doubt it very seriously
that it would have been3reported except that we called, and they knew
damn well that it was us calling, asking about this. I personally be-
lieve, and there are no ' reporters here tonight, are there? Are there
any reporters here?
MR. DOUGLASS: I think there is someone writing here.
MRS. CSAJKO: Is there?
MRS. SHIRLEY BACHRACH: I'm from the League of Women Voters.
MRS. CSAJKO: That is not a reporter.
MR. DOUGLASS: This is going to be in the public record anyway.
MRS. CSAJKO: I don't want it said I am doing this for publicity
or anything like that, okay? What I am getting at is that this Board
should make an attempt if nothing else to spot check what is going on
in the Building Department.
MR. DOUGLASS: I would suggest that you go back to the Building
Department and discuss it with them, because it is not within our realm.
MR. GRIGONIS: It is not our duty.
MRS. CSAJKO: You are evading the issue, Mr. Douglass.
MR. DOUGLASS: No, I'm not.
what my realm of duty is.
know what my orders are. I know
MRS. CSAJKO: I know what your realm of duty is. You have a duty
to the public also.. And the Building Department is not putting through
things that should come here. You are negligent by not checking them
out. Come on, everybody has to have a little bit of checking back and
forth to see what the other guy is doing. They are not doing their
jobs correctly. Are you going to do your job correctly?
MR. DOUGLASS: We do. We go out on the road and check these applica-
tions and we have held this session long enough and go ahead on this
appeal. Is there anyone else who desires to be heard. Any other
questions?
MRS. CSAJKO: Wait a minute. I'm sorry Mr. Douglass...
MR. DOUGLASS: What you are talking about M'am does not pertain to
this appeal.
MR. CSAJKO: I am making a formal request right now. That you hold
a hearing on the first variance... If you have nothing to do with the
Building Department that a hearing be held on the first variance. I was
not informed through legal proceedings according to the Southold Town
Law. Mr, what's his name, Thomson. He was supposed to inform me. Each
neighbor is supposed to get a registered letter. I never received one.
I would like this hearing postponed and a variance held on the first
addition.
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS 16- July 5, 1979
MR. DOUGLASS: We cannot pos%pone it unless you ar~ going to put
all your arguments against the proposal.
MRS. CSAJKO: Okay, we will completely object as there has never
been a variance hearing held on the first addition. Understand Mr.
Douglass we are not fighting with our neighboring. We are bringing
something up that is terribl~ important to this Town.
MR. CSAJKO: I think Mr. and Mrs. Johnson, residents of the Town
will appreciate what we are doing.
MR. THOMSON: My name is Thomson, not Johnson.
MR. DOUGLASS: Mr. Ahlers?
MR. AHLERS: Mr. Chairman, won't your granting of the additional
foot also cover the additional footage that the Building Department
missed the first time.
MR. DOUGLASS: No. Because all we can grant here tonight is the
additional area. That's what you have asked for in this variance.
MRS. CSAJKO: Now you are granting their additional area. What
happens to the area they have already put in that has not been granted.
MR. DOUGLASS: I think you should go back to the Building Department.
I really do, M'am and see if they want to pursue it in any other manner.
MR. CSAJKO: The Building Department has nothing to do with granting
a variance.
MR. DOUGLASS: The Building Department has to make their move before
we are even involved.
MR. GRIGONIS: There has to be a denial by the Building Department
before an appeal can be made to ~his Board. That is the only way it comes
to us.
MRS. CSAJKO: We realize this. We are not picking on you guys.
MR. GRIGONIS: You should have gone to the Building Department at
that time if you thought that a violation was being committed. About
75 percent of the hearings we get arrive here that way. A neighbor or
someone calls or comes in and tells the Building Department they think
there is something wrong.
MRS. CSAJKO: Then what is the Building Department doing?
MR. CSAJKO: What are they doing? Just sitting on·~their asses?
MR. DOUGLASS: Wait a minute, let's watch the language.
MR. CSAJKO: I'm sorry. We have no objection to this at all.
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -17- July 5, 1979
absolutely no objection. Give them the variance. What we are trying
to bring before this board is that we feel the Building Department is
derelict in bringing things to your attention. You can't work on it
if the Building Department doesn't bring it to your attention. We
are not fighting with you.
MR. DOUGLASS: You've made your point. Now let us proceed with
the appeal before us.
MRS. CSAJKO: How can you give an approval on something on some-
thing that has not been approved.
MR. DOUGLASS: It has nothing to do with this appeal. We are
approving this appeal, or disapproving it, whatever the Board desires.
The houses all along that area, most of them, are close and tight. It
was a narrow lot community way back when it started. In my opinion ....
Does anyone else on the Board want to say anything before I go?
MR. TUTHILL: I'm ready to make a motion. I make such a motion.
MRS. CSAJO: We knew that already. It was a foregoing conclusion.
MR. DOUGLASS: We will take up what you have brought up before us
with the Building Department, and I suggest that you go back to the
Building Department and discuss it with them, too.
MRS. CSAJKO: Oh, I intend to. But I thought it was something
that should be brought to your attention. In no way are we charging
you people with dereliction of duty, but I feel that the Building Depart-
ment is not doing their job and therefore you cannot do your job.
MR. DOUGLASS: Well, we go out and inspect these properties before
we have these hearings. The fact is we have very good pictures of the
exact project that are on record in our files here, in mine, showing
exactly what they want, showing the positioning of the house on the
total property, and we do with everything that we are going to have before
us. So we make our own judgment. The Building Department does not
make our judgment, nor does any other department. We are totally inde-
pendent, and we are not the enforcing agency. But we will go back to the
Building Department and tell them they better get their calculators up.
MRS. CSAJKO: That is exactly what I wanted you to say.
MR. TUTHILL: I don't we have the time here to have an open forum
here.
MRS. CSAJKO: I beg your pardon.
States of America.
This happens to be the United
MR. DOUGLASS: The appeal is closed.
MR. TUTHILL: You should go to the Building Department, Mrs. Csajko,
not to us.
MR. DOUGLASS: Don't get into any discussion with her, the discussion
is over.
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -18- July 5, 1979
MRS. CSAJKO: The part of the discussion with us being refused to
speak to this Board will be brought before the Town Board. Now...
MR. DOUGLASS: Don't ......
MR. CSAJKO:
MRS. CSAJKO:
rant to the Town.
the Town Board.
MR. CSAJKO:
Don't say "don't," Mr. Chairman.
We mentioned this because we felt it was very impor-
You want to cut us off, okay, we will bring it before
I would like to say one more thing, Mr. Chairman. You
have granted an over-sized addition to an already over-sized building.
How much further do you go when they come back for another over-sized
addition? I would like an answer?
MR. DOUGLASS: We will have to wait to see if they ever do.
MR. CSAJKO: I will make a bet they do. That's good government.
MR. TUTHILL: Good night.
After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applioants
are requesting permission to construct an addition to an existing house
which would cause the usage of more than 20 percent of the building lot.
The addition will be two stories in height and will occupy 2.43 percent
of the lot than is allowed under the Southold Town Zoning Ordinance.
The Board agrees with the reasoning of the applicant.
The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would pro-
duce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created
is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate
vicinity of the property and in the same use district; and the variance
will not change the character of the neighborhood and will observe the
spirit of the Ordinance.
On motion of Mr. Tuthill, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was
RESOLVED that Jay and Mary Thomson, 695 Bayshore Drive, Greenport,
New York, be GRANTED permission to construct an addition to an existing
house which would cause the usage of 22.43% of the lot. Location of
property: Bayshore Road, Greenport, New York, known as Lot No. 64, in
Peconic Bay Estates, Greenport, New York.
Vote of the Board:
Tuthill.
pUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No.
Marion Ales, Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, New York, for a variance to
the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule
for permission to divide property with insufficient area and width. Lo-
cation of property: Meadow Lane, Cutchogue, New York, bounded on the
Ayes: Messrs: Douglass, Grigonis, Doyen and
2560 - Upon application of Victor and
1~0~ NO. 1
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE
SOUTHOLD, N. Ye
19.~. .... Permit No..~..~ .........
~uil'din-g Inspector)
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
INSTRUCTIONS
a. Thi~ application must be completely filled in by typewriter or~ in ink and submitted in triplicate to the Building
Inspector, with 3 sets~Of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule.
b. 'Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets oF
areas, and giving[ a detdiled description of layout ofproperty must be drawn on the diagram which is part of this application.
c. The work coveredby this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit.
d. Upon oppr°Val of this application, the Building Inspector will issde o Building Permit to the applicant. Such permit
shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work.
e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose whatever until a Certificate of Occupancy
shall, have b~en granted by the Building Inspector.
APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the
Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New york, and Other applicable Laws, Ordinances or
Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions or alterations, or for removal or demolition, as herein described.
The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and to
admit authorized inspectors on premises and in buildings for necessary inspections.
GEORGE AHLERS, BUILDER~ INC~
(Signature of applicant, or name, if a corporation)
250 Cox Lane
............. G u,J; c,bogu.¢. ~... ~ ~.'~..,Yo,~.k ....119.35 ......................
(Address of applicant)
State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder.
................... .G.~nflmal_ .~.o.n.tnao.t o.r. ...................................................................................................................................
Name of owner of premises .... ~..~.,¥...~ll~....~..G. T3C..~..~...O..t'[t..S. QTA ....................................................................
If applicant is a corporate, signature of duly authorized officer.
........................................................................................ George Ahler~, Pre~±dent
(Name and title of corporate officer)
Builder's License No. 31
Plumber's License No .................................................
Electrician's License No .............................................
Other Trade's License No ............................................... M~~./...
i. Location of land on which proposed work will be done ........................... Lot No ........... 6.Z,~. .........
Street and Number ..... ~..~c. Qt0J. f;...3~3.M..~sJ:;a.teE, ...................... ........................................... G~fl.~l~.O.~..~. .........
~6r(j~(- Bayshore Road Municipality
2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of ,propo%ed construction:
J~. Intended use and occupancy ....... .c].,,#..e..,1..1...i.~ ...................................... ! ........... ~~~ .........
3. Nature of work (check which applicable): New Building.. ................. Addition X Alteration
Repair .................. Removal .................. Demolition .................... Other Work .....................................................
(Description)
4. Estimated Cost .... .~. .]: .0. . ,. .~. .0. . .0. .: . .0. .0. ................................ Fee ............................................................................ , .............
(to be paid on filing this application)
5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units ............................ Number of dwelling units on each floor ............................
If garage, number of cars .............................................................................................................................................
6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each t~pe of use ............................
7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front ...L~.,?.,r...6.~l.....+./..-. .... Rear /4.'I t 6" Depth /4.'1
Height .......... 18~ ....... Number of Stories ..QD.e. ........................................................................................................
,6,, + .....
Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front ....LIz~ ............. /.:T ............ Rear
Depth ......~.] ....... .+./ ......... Height ...18. ................... Number of Stories ..... .QZ~ ...................
8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front .................................... Rear ............................ Depth ........................
Height .................... Number of Stories .....................................................................................................................
0t
9. Size of lot: Front .......... ~. ............................................ Rear ........... ~....,.~.0. ................ Depth ...~,~.[ ....................
10. Date of Purchase ..~/.Z6/.7,8 ..................................... Name of Former Owner ........................................................
11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated
12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation: ..... D.Q ..............................................
13. Will lot be regraded , ...... ,~, ,o. ................ Will excess fill be removed fram premises: ( ) Yes ( ) No
14. Name of Owner of premises .. ~.a.~......a~..~...~..a...z~...~.o..m..~g~,. Address .~.W,~..~,~)~?..6.~.. SI~ No. ......................
Name of Architect .............................................................. Address .~..13,~..~[~.. Phone No .......................
Name of Contractor Ge~;e..~,hler. s.,...Bu.~3~dar. ...... Address .CU.~C~Q~,I,I~.~....L~ Phone No. ,~.~./~...~.Q~,I)...
PLOT DIAGRAM
Locate clearly and distinctly all buildings, whether existing or proposed, and indicate oil set-back dimensions fram
property lines. Give street and block number or description according to deed, and show street names and Imilcole
whether interior or corner Iol.
£
STATE OF NEW ~ORJ~,_~ , ,//'-"~1 c S
COUNTY OF ....... .~ ...../~,.....c~..~.!..... ),
Georger~A:~ hlers ..
................................................................................................. oe.ng duly sworn, deposes and soys t~t he is the applicam
(Name of individual signing contracf)
above named.
He is the ........... 9.~.~...~.~9.~[ ............................................................................................................................
(Contractor, agent, corporate officer, etc.)
of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to ~ke and file
this application; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and
thaz the work will be perfo~ed in the manner set fo~h in the application filed therewith.
Sworn to before me this / I
..... ,9
';;;;;";'i;';Z ..... .....................................
~ (Signo e o app icont)
~ U~IC, Slate of New