Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7748-zTOWN OF $OUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Town Clerk's Office Southold, N. Y. Certificate Of Occupancy No. I~ .66.6.1~ ..... Date ~C-~ THIS CERTIFIES ,that the b~lding located at., .Pg~,~y, D~V~ ............ Street ~8~99 ~ ~o. Pe.~. ~]oe~ ~o ........... ~o~ ~o.. 2 ....... ~e~...~ ........ conforms substantially to,the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated ............ ~.. ~.., 19.~. p~su~t to which Building Pemit No... dated ............ E~... ~.~., 19. ~, was issued, ~d conforms to all of the req~r~ ments of the applicable pro~sions of the law. The occup~cy for which this certificate is issued is .. P~F~. ~9..~.~y. ~g ........ . .~ ........................... The certificate is issued to .~Vanco. & E~g~nia.. ~e~i ....... ~ers .... (owner, lessee or ten~t) of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of He~th Approval ~P~ .~...~.~., .b~. ~ .Y~ ...... UNDERWRiTeRS C~RT~FICATE No..~. 2~1~0~.. .... i~.. 10.. ~.17~ ............. HOUSE NUMBER .... 78.0 ...... Street .... [~t~ .~. D~i~ .................. ....... ********************************* **************************************** . ....... Building Inspector FO~.~ HO. 2 TOWN OF $OUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFIGE SOUTHOLD, N~ Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE P]~EMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) N? 7748 Z Permission is hereby granted to: ....... ~'..... ~/h ~p J.a'q g...I{.o, llo.~...~ ..................... ~ ................... ~..a.~..~,.~..q~ ............................... :. to ~.:.a.~ ~ ...r.,.~.v....o..~....c..a..~ ~.z.y.....a.~.~.~.c ...................................................................................... at premises located at ~,Q.'~...2.....~.?.~.~.t~...~.gJ~.~..~.l~.l~ ........................................................................ ............................................. P..e. ~,.~.:¢...~.. ~.~ ............ ~:L~r~t~ ................................................................... pursuant to application dated ............................. ~'. ....... ~.I ........ , 19.~ ~. , and approved by the Building Inspector. Fee $.~.~.~.~ ~-.~' ......... ~udding Inspector FORM NO. 6 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD , Building Deportment Town Glerks Office $outhold, N. Y. ]]97] APPLIGATION FOR GERTIFICATE oF OCGUPANGY Instructions A. This application must be filled in typewriter OR, ink, and submitted in DUPLICATE to the Building Inspector with the following; for new buildings or new use: 1. Final survey of property with accurate location of all buildings, property lines, streets, and unusual natural or topographic features. 2. Final approval of Health Dept. of water supply and sewerage disposal--(S-9 form or equal), 3. Approval of electrical installation from Board of Fire Underwriters. 4. Commercial buildings, Industrial buildings, Multiple Residences and similar buildings and installations, a certificate of Code compliance from the Architect or Engineer responsible for the building. 5, Submit Planning Board approval of completed site plan requirements where applicable. B. For existing buildings (prior to April 1957), Non-conforming uses, or buildings and "pre-existing" land uses: 1. Accurate survey of property showing all property lines, streets, buildings and unusual natural or topographic features. 2. Sworn statement of owner or previous owner as to use, occupancy and condition of buildings. 3. Date of any housing code or safety inspection of buildings or premises, or other pertinent formation required to prepare a certificate. C. Fees: l. Certificate of occupancy $5.00 2. Certificate of occupancy on pre-existing dwelling or land use $5.00 3. Copy of certificate of occupancy $1.00 Dote .... .~./~8/.7.5. .......................... New Building .....~.. ......... Addition ................ Old or Pre-existing Building ................ Vacant Land .............. Location Of Property 'Pe..%~¥ ' ~ D~,ve Owner Or Owners Of Property ,. .Q;i,?,~T...a..~p..o..a.~.~ .~,e.~.z...a...?4,o,n.a..oellz . Subdivision ................................................................ Lot No ...... -.: ..... Block No ............. House No.?., Permit No .77..~8 Z Date Of Permit ...~..a....~.9..h..,.1..1Applicant G&~ Construction Corp. Health Dept. Approval ............. .X....:~.Z.c~'..../."Z .~... ...... Labor Dept. Approval ................................................ Underwriters Approval ...............~c...~',~T...c/d../.,..~...~.O.....'...~........Planning Board Approval ........................................ Request For Temporary Certificate ........................................ FinoJ Certificate ........ .~...e..8. ........................... Fee Submitted $ ...~...,..0...0. ....................... Construction on above described building and permit meets all applicable codes and regulations. Applicant ...~..~.'~...~.....C. O~S t r.u.o t l..9~.r~...C..9..r.,p.. . Sworn ,o before me this ..... 2~2>'z$... da~ of ~~..~..l.~.l~ (stamp or seal) CO Nota~ Public ..........~ Cou~ SUF~l~LK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES Health Services Reference Number e 3. 4. 10. APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A PRIVATE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM AND A WATER SUPPLY 11. Applicant~(~'Y~ Address Property Village Public Water Comp.Qnv Name Lot size: WidthY~ feet Sewage Disposal System: A. ~00~- allon septic tank: Precastt~ _Equivalent Block Bo Leaching pools: Number of pools / Precast~a~b Block ~pecial__ If private well, fill in the fol- lowing blanks: A. Tank capacity ,, gallons Bo Pump G.P,M. ~ Co Total well depth D. Depth to ground water E. Amount of water in well Length ~) feet 5. Subdiv. ~q~J~ Section 7. Lot Number 8.~ Private Well 9. Public Water Distance to main )alth Services Dept. Use) The undersigned CERTIFIES: "Construction of authorized installations will be in accordance with the Suffolk County Department of Heal th Services' current standards thereto." This application will be valid for one year from the date of approval indicated below and may be renewed if a current local Building Department Permit is in effect. Date /YY~/~' C/'/ ~ /~7 ~ Si gned FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES~ USE ONLY. Based on the information presented here- with, it is the opinion of the Department of Health Services that an adequate and satis- factory Sewage Disposal System and Water Supply can be installed on this plot. APPROVAL DATE__ 7//~/77 SIGNED~ ~'~----~----- __ ~ S-15 Rev. 4/1/73 °8 o o o 0 MINUTES BOARD O~ HOUSING APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OCTOBER 6, 1975 A hearing was held by the Board of Housing Appeals, Town of Southold, at 8:00 P.M. (E.D.S.T.), Monday, October 6, 1975 at the Town office, Main Road, Southold, New York. There were present: Messrs: E. Kenneth Tabor, Chairman; John J. Talbot; Frank A. Lekich. Also present: Mr. George Fisher, Building Inspector of the Town of Southold; and Mr. Guy Martin, President of G. & M. Construction Corporation. The Chairman called the hearing to order, and opened the hearing by reading the Request for a Variance in the matter of the Appeal of G. & M. Construction Corporation. (Copy attached). THE CHAIRMAN: We will hear first from. Mr. George Fisher. MR. GEORGE FISHER, Building Inspector: For the Board's inspection, I submit Building Permit No. 7748Z and a set of blueprints. The notations are in "red". I also have here the Notice of Violation signed by Mr. Howard Terry. At the time of the second inspection the house was being framed, it was not completed, and the windows were checked at tha~ time and okay'd. THE C]LAIRMAN: Were just the windows okay'd at that time? MR. FISHER: Yes. Concerning the floor area of the two bedrooms, they were found to be undersized at a later inspection after the closets had been installed. A Certificate of Occupancy was denied and an appeal was made. Here is a copy of the notice sent to the builder on the 23rd of September. Board of Housing Appeals -2- October 6, 1975 (The Board inspected all material submitted by Mr. Fisher). THE CHAIRMAN: We would now like to hear from Mr. Guy Martin, President of G. & M. Construction Corporation. MR. GUY MARTIN: This is a partially pre-fabricated house. You can frame or enclose the shell house without partitions inside. Having seen Mr. Terry's notations on the plan, I did not know whether he meant windows or floor area. I think it was on the second inspection that all the floors were open. I said "let's see what this means", which we did. We measured all walls both ways without having our closets there which served both bedrooms. The house was enclosed but did not have those closets. We kept coming up with more than enough floor area. Based on the notations on the Inspector's plans, we c~ne up with way over what was required. We felt that the Inspector probably meant the windows. We had more than enough glass there. So, we determined that it was probably just an error. I was told that it was okay to go ahead and complete. This error was picked up on the last inspection. The rooms were remeasured and we came up too short, 2" short. MR. FISHER: I did not take the final measurements. MR. FRANK LBKICH: side. If it's 1/4" to number of feet? 9.8' x 8' which is 4" short on one the foot, does it measure the required MR. GUY MARTIN: Yes. We measured on the job site. We measured the actual floor area. MR. JOHN TALBOT: Is a set of plans on the job? MR. MARTIN: Yes. MR. TALBOT: Did not Mr. Terry measure the plans? The origlnal drawing says they are too small. MR. MARTIN: We did not know what it was because while we were measuring,these rooms were open. While we were both on our knees we came up with more room than we needed. The closets were not there. When he came in for the first in- spection and the second, this was wide open. We were not thinking about closets. We measured again at the time of the final inspection. Board of Housing Appeals -3- October 6, 1975 MR. JOHN TALBOT: Have you ever built this type of house before? MR. MARTIN: Not this house. THE CHAIRMAN: DO you have some comments to make on this, George? MR. FISHER: As Mr. Martin and I saw enough window light. were going to be alright. stated, we checked ih over It appeared that the windows THE CHAI~4AN: Were you checking for window and floor area? MR. FISHER: Yes. MR. FRANK LEKICH: If this was not clear to you, did you check with Mr. Terry when you got back to the office? MR. FISHER: I could not say. I don't recall now, Frank. MR. LEKICH: What solution would there be in order to make these rooms the proper size without costing a great deal of money? MR. MARTIN: I suppose the whole wall could be eliminated. When we went over these things to try to solve the problem quickly, Mr. Tasker said "what if we remove the closet doors?" That would give us 80 sq. ft. of floor space. Then we said we would go to appeal to see what the Board thinks about it. The rooms are a bit small but these people have two very small children. The house is 78 feet long so they have more than enough room. These bedrooms, aside from the master bed- room, are small. One is for one of the children and the other for a TV room. MR. LEKICH: You have an open basement, a full cellar. MR. MARTIN: It's 8 feet high. THE CHAIRMAN: This has nothing to do with the rooms in question but we were wondering, when we looked the whole job over, how you are allowed to install such stairways. As you gO on to the stairway you can hit your head on the iron. Board of Housing Appeals -4- October 6, 1975 MR. MARTIN: I am against this sort of stairway but some people insist on paying as much as $5,900 for them. THE CHAIRMAN: They seem to be dangerous. MR. MARTIN: Especially for a tall person. appearance of them. My personal opinion is that have one in my house. People like the I would not THE CHAIRMAN: Are there any other questions that any of the Board would like to ask? MR. JOHN TALBOT: If you were able to cut down the closet area by putting sliding doors in, would that help the situation? MR. MARTIN: We have closets to service each room. I think each is 5 feet wide. If we opened up the front of them it would give us 80 sq. ft. THE CHAIRMAN: You would take out the whole front. MR. MARTIN: no closet. Yes, but the children's bedroom would have MR. JOHN TALBOT: It would be difficult to put a bed in here because this closet door (referring to blueprint) swings in here and here the opening swings out into the hall. So, it's difficult to set a bed up. MR. MARTIN: I sometimes feel that the salesmen from the pre-fabricated companies should be more concerned with their clients. I even discovered 'there were no shelves for linens. MR. JOHN TALBOT: You probably make those suggestions to your clients and they do not abide by them. It seems a shame that people sacrifice their safety. It's a fairly expensive house. MR. MARTIN: It's a $65,000 home without land. I think they purchased it three or four years ago. When they came to me they would not allow me to do their final painting because it is so expensive. I have been in this business for 24 years so I know you have to work with what their wishes are. Even if your personal feeling is not the same. MR. FRANK LEKICH: Is most of your lumber pre-cut? Board of Housing Appeals -5- October 6, 1975 MR. MARTIN: Yes, except the inside partitions. This house is over-built, there is a lot of wasted material. THE CHAIRMAN: Does the Board have any to ask Mr. Martin? If not, we will discuss let you know what our decision is. other questions the problem and MR. JOHN TALBOT: Would it reduce the value of the house to any extent if those two closets were removed? MR. MARTIN: They have two small children and it seems that these were to be their bedrooms when they became old enough to use these rooms. These materials, as far as the basic structure is concerned, could be removed but it would not serve their purpose. We have a loft up there that is very large. We have a very small bedroom which they want to use as a TV room or Printing Room which could have been left wide open. By removing this wall it would become only one bedroom. They wanted two separate bedrooms. THE C}~IRM~N: You may be excused. You will hear from us in a few days as to our decision. (The Board discussed the various points brought out at the hearing). THE CHAIRMAN: There as to what the Inspectors times. seem to be some discrepancies here have told the builder at various MR. FISHER: At the ~ime we discussed it, I marked "OK" on the drawings. THE CHAIRMAN: We know the measurements are right because we were there. MR. FISHER: At the time, I figured we had two legal sized rooms and enough windows. MR. LEKICH: They did not take into consideration that these closets were going in there. After investigation and inspection the findings of the Board are that the measurements of the two bedrooms were taken before the closets were installed and, at a later inspection, the bedrooms were found to be undersized after the close[s had been installed. The Board finds that due to the cathedral ceilings in each bedroom, there is very much more cubic footage in each room than a standard room would require. Therefore, the Board finds that granting the variance would be justified. Board of HousingAppeals -6- October 6, 1975 On a motion regularly made and carried, it was RESOLVED, G. & M. Consqruction Corporation, East Hampton, New York, as general contractor for Gianfranco and Eugenia Monacelli, the owners of property~at Orient, New York, known as Lot No. 2 on a certain subdivision map entitled "Peqty's Bight", be GRANTED a variance, as applied for. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Tabor, Talbot, Lekich. For the Record: The members of the Board visited the site, Lot No. 2, Perry's Bight, Orient, New York, on September 22, 1975. Hearing was held on October 6, 1975. The hearing was adjourned at 9:15 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) Respectfully submitted, Marjor~e McDermott Secretary E. Kenneth Tabor, Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF HOUSING APPEALS In the Matter of the Appeal of G AND M CONSTI~UCTION COt~POI~ATION. : REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO THE BOARD OF HOUSING APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: 1. That appellant, G and 1VI Construction Corp. of East Hampton, New York is the general contractor for Gianfranco and Eugenia Monacelli, the owners of property at Orient, New York, known as Lot No. 2 on a certain subdivision map entitled "Perry's Bight". 2. That appellant hereby requests that the Housing Board of Appeals grant a variance to the provisions of Section 52-22 A (1) of the Housing Code of the Town of Southold pursuant io the provisions of Section 52-103 of said code for the reasons hereinafter set forth. 3. That heretofore appellant, on behalf of the owners of the above mentioned lot, applied to the Building Inspector of the Town of Southold for a building permit to construct a dwelling on said premises. That in conjunction therewith, appellant filed with the Building Deparlrnent plans and specifications for said,dwelling which consisted of a partially prefabricated dwelling manufactured by Boise Cascade of Livingston, Massachusetts. That said plans and specifications were prepared by Boise Cascade. 4. That upon the issuance of lhe building permit, the Building Inspector noted on the plans that two of the three bedrooms were "undersized". 5. That after the main structure was erected and before partitions were installed, appellant and one of the ]Building Inspectors rneasured the bedrooms in question and concluded that the floor area of each bedroom exceeded eighty (80) square feet and that accordingly they complied with the provisions of the Housing Code. Since the Buildin~ Inspector at the site and appellant both believed that the original notation on the plans resulted from an erroneous computation of the floor areas, appellant was advised by the t~uilding Inspector at the site to proceed with construction. 8. That construction was substantially completed on or about September 1, 1975 and on September 5, 1975, appellant applied to the ]Building Inspector for a Certificate of Occupancy. 7. On September §, 1975, one of the Building Inspectors inspected the dwelling and advised appe~llant that the two bedroo~ns in question did not comply with the Itousing Code in that the floor area of each bedroom contained approximately seventy-seven and one-third (77-1/3) square feet instead on the required eighty (80) square feet. 8. That upon discovering this violation, both appellant and the ]~uilding Department of the Town reviewed this matter in detail and have both concluded that the violation came about by reason of the fact that the measurements were taken at the site prior to the installation of the closet partitions in each bedroom and this fact was not taken into account when said measurements v~ere made on the site. 9. That appellant does hereby urge that since such violation arose by a mutual mistake by both appel].ant and the ]Building Department of the Town of Southold and that to require the correction of such defect after the building has been com- pleted, would entail substantial sums of money thereby imposing an extreme hardship on the owners of the premises. Appellant further states that the variation in floor area amounts to less than three (3) square feet which results in the bedrooms in question having a floor area of less than four (4~0) percent of the required eighty (80) square feet. 10. Appellant respectfully submits that the granting of the variance requested herein will not adversely affect the public health and safety of the Town of Southold. WHEREFORE, appellant respectfully requests that the Board of Housing Appeals of the Town of Southold grant the variance requested herein. Dated: September/~, 1975 G AND m CONSTRUCTI~O~N CORIP. -- Gd~rtin, President