HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/23/2022
Town of Southold
Agricultural Advisory Committee Meeting
Minutes of March 23, 2022
Members Present Members Absent Guests
Tom Stevenson – Chairperson Anthony Sannino Greg Doroski (TB Member)
Chris Baiz John Sepenoski Louia Evans (TB Member)
Doug Cooper Katie Sepenoski
Jim Glover
Steve Schnee
John B. Sepenoski Jr.
Mark VanBourgondien
Scott Russell (TB Liaison)
Opening:
rd
The Agricultural Advisory Committee meeting was called to order on Wednesday March 23 at 7:10
pm in the Southold Town Hall meeting hall.
Next Meeting(s):
th
The next regular AAC meeting will be held on Wednesday April 6 2022, at 7:00 pm in the Southold
Town Hall meeting hall and via Zoom.
Meeting Minutes:
thth
Motion to Approve the February 9 and March 9 meeting minutes, made by John Sepenoski Jr.,
seconded by Tom Stevenson, ALL in Favor who voted.
Committee Membership:
Chris Baiz met with Denis Noncarrow and Lynda Rudder to discuss the committee members
terms and to correct the information on the Towns website.
Each year there should be three members terms that expire, at which time the member needs
to email the Town Clerks office to renew their term or resign from the committee.
st
The members who need to email Lynda Rudder by March 31 to renew their term for 2022, are
Chris Baiz, Doug Cooper, and John Sepenoski Jr.
The members whose terms expire in 2023 are Jim Glover, Anthony Sannino, and Tom
Stevenson.
The members whose terms expire in 2024 are Steven Schnee, John Sepenoski, and Mark
VanBourgondien.
Farm Worker Housing Definition:
Please see attachment of farmworker housing definition samples from the Town Attorney’s
office. They were given for information and reference.
The first definition does list the Town of Southold in the definition, so it could possibly be a
definition already in the code.
Page 1 | 3
Town of Southold
Agricultural Advisory Committee Meeting
Minutes of March 23, 2022
Supervisor Russell said he would check to see if It’s in the Towns code. If the definition is
already on the code a new definition isn’t needed.
Supervisor Russell also stated that the committee has submitted their recommendation and
definition already to the Town Board, the Board has gathered their own information and at this
point the Board needs to decide on a definition and notice it at the same time as the big house.
The Supervisor does not agree with a part of the definition in regard to immediate family and
farm owners. They should be excluded from farm labor housing. Chapter 483 clearly
distinguishes farm owners and immediate family.
Discussion on family and farm labor housing. What qualifies as farm labor housing and what is
just another house for family that works on the farm.
Chapter 70:
At the code committee meeting yesterday (03/22) a memo from the planning board was
presented that was initiated on 07/30/21.
A response needs to be given to the Town Board by next week from the AAC.
Discussion on the memo and the process it recommends.
The memo came to be after the recommendations made by this committee on Chapter 70 was
sent to the Board. It was then forwarded to Land Preservation and Planning, the memo was
plannings response. The Land Preservation response was received last year with notes
showing what they agreed with and disagreed with.
The consensus is that the memo is a step backwards in the process. The committee has
done the work. Put in hours of time to come up with what they feel is a fair update to Chapter
70.
The planning committee memo is recommending (in the memo) that 4-6 people form a
committee, which is not enough to have all the people needed to form a proper committee to
work on this.
Greg Doroski said the question that needs to be answered is what is a development right. A
consensus needs to be determined to move forward.
Mark stated to find out what a development right is you have to go back to the beginning and
the original intent. The land on the east end was meant to preserve agriculture and by
preserving agriculture you are preserving the vista.
The plan in the beginning was also meant to try and help agricultural families who were going
through a recession and to preserve the land from mass development.
Need to figure out what the expectation is and figure out what the balance is for those rights.
For example, the vistas or greenhouses. It is unfair to limit what the farmer can grow to
preserve those vistas. Farming like any other industry needs to adapt to the changing times.
Doug Cooper asked that the following be noted: He keeps hearing the taxpayers is
complaining about they are getting when the development rights are purchased. The school
tax on property is around 60% to 70%. The cost to educate a child in Mattituck-Cutchogue
school district is about $40-$45,000 per year. A piece of property with a new house and a
new family with two kids costs the district about $80,000 a year to educate those kids. But if
the town were to buy the development rights off that piece of property for about $80,000 an
acre and that is only a one-time cost (not annually like the school) in two years of those kids in
school paid for those development rights. Now its not all tax payers that are paying for the
development rights. Its new people that are coming in or real estate transfers that are taxed.
That transfer tax should be looked at as a mitigation fee. When someone new comes here
they are costing the town, from police to fire, to school. That tax is nowhere near enough to
Page 2 | 3
Town of Southold
Agricultural Advisory Committee Meeting
Minutes of March 23, 2022
cover the cost of those services. When the town buys the development rights the land owner
gets a one-time payment, there is no additional money for future generations. But the town
and the taxpayers benefit forever. It’s a yearly advantage of the community to own those
development rights, its less school taxes, less police needed, etc.. But future generations of
that land do not benefit ever again.
Doug also wanted noted that open space pays no taxes and costs the town money to
maintain. Preserved farmland still pays taxes, it pays the same taxes as non-preserved farm
land.
There is a major tax savings to the town and that is the benefit the town receives from buying
the development rights.
The town needs to do a better job at educating the public about what the tax is actually paying
for and who is paying it. Also, showing the benefits of those purchases.
The definition of a development right currently reads as excludes agricultural production.
Because ag structures are part of ag production, they should also be excluded from the
easement restrictions.
There is a flawed sense that the farmer has to give something back for the money they
receive and that is becoming stripping the farmer of their ag rights. That is not right because
they are not buying their ag rights. What the town is getting back is the inability to build
houses on the land. That was the original goal of the law to prevent overdevelopment and
preserve the open land.
The Committee is making a recommendation to the board to not use the Planning
departments letter as a guideline to move forward on farm land on preserved land. But we
need to keep working with the board and planning and land preservation in a group to move
forward.
The board needs to hear other perspectives of what people think a development right is and
ultimately the board will decide the definition. That doesn’t mean it can’t change in the future
with a different board.
Further discussion on development rights and how it has developed into what it is and how it
can be changed.
.
Adjournment:
MOTION to adjourn at 8:45 pm made by Chris Baiz, seconded by John Sepenoski Jr., ALL in favor.
Minutes respectfully submitted by: Laura Arena
Page 3 | 3
WILLLAM McQUAIDOF SCOTT A.RUSSELL
. TOWN ATTORNEY �'QF ;
� '
bill.duffy@town.southold.ny.us
5 Supervisor
DAMON
A. ' Town Hall Annex, 54375 Route 25
ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY P.O. Box 1179
daonh@southoldtownny.gov CIO Southold,New York 11971-0959
JOHN J. BURKE Telephone (631) 765-1939
ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY co ur Facsimile (631) 765-6639
johnbu@southoldtownny.gov
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Date: March 22, 2022
To: Code Committee and Town Board
From: John Burke, Deputy Town Attonic
Re: AGRICULTURAL WORKER HOI.J,SG DEFINITIONS
AGRICULTURAL WORKER HOUSING
Any area of land and all buildings or other structures pertaining thereto, any part of which may
be occupied by persons employed as laborers in farm activities in the Town of Southold who are
provided with sleeping facilities, in whole or in part, by the owner without a stipulated
agreement as to the duration of their stay or whether or not they are supplied with meals, but who
are supplied with such services or facilities as are necessary for agricultural production on the
owner's property
HOUSING FOR AGRICULTURAL LABOR
The term"housing for agriculture labor"means dwellings and group quarters used to provide
housing for regular and essential employees and their immediate families who are primarily
employed in connection with the subject farm operation. Regular employees are those who are
usually and customarily employed to assist in producing farm products and essential employees
are those, without whose help, a necessary production function of the farm operation could not
take place. The Property owner or its immediate family members cannot use the buildings or
structures used for housing for agricultural labor as a primary residence, except that a farm
owner's immediate family members may qualify as farm workers only if they are regular and
essential employees of the farm and do not maintain an ownership interest in the farm operation.
Housing for agricultural labor shall be subject to and must comply with all applicable state,
county and local regulations and laws.
FARM WORKER HOUSING
On-farm structures occupied by farm laborers who are employed primarily on the farm where the
structures are located and any nonworking family members of such laborers. Farm worker
housing shall not include housing for any owners, lessees or operators of the farm or any
officers, partners or members thereof.
1
FARM WORKER HOUSING.
Farm worker housing shall be allowed to house workers who are directly employed on the farm
on which the housing is located, and their families. Such housing shall comply with all of the
requirements of the New York State Sanitary Code. The Planning Board shall refer to the New
York State Health Department for review of the sanitary plans for the fifth and every subsequent
unit of farm worker housing and for any multifamily structure used for farm worker housing.
Such housing shall also comply with all of the requirements of the New York uniform Fire
Prevention and Building Code and current HUD standards with respect to mobile homes. Such
housing must comply with the setback restrictions of this chapter as though they were principal
uses; however, lot area requirements do not apply to this use. In issuing a special use permit for
this use,the Planning Board shall set forth terms for removal of the structures in the event the
use ceases.
FARM LABOR HOUSING
A dwelling unit used by farm employees and their families.
2