HomeMy WebLinkAboutZEVITS, JOSEPH TRUSTEES
John M. Bredemeyer, III, President
---Henry P. Smith, Vice President
Albert J. Krupski, Jr.
John L. Bednoski, Jr.
John B. Tuthill
Telephone (516) 765-1892
February 2, 1990
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Rog
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
Walter Lindley
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Wastewater Management Division
County Center
Riverhead, NY 11901
RE: Joseph Zevits, Wetlands permit for one family dwelling.
Dear Mr. Lindley:
The Southold Town Board of Trustees does not have any
jurisdiction over a well and cesspool or any project located
more than 75' from wetland fringe. Therefore, the Board would
encourage the Suffolk County Department of Health Services to
complete its review process. If this is too complicated, then
please send us a copy of the placement of well and septic system
showing your approval of the site and it's location to the-
wetlands. This Board will then review the application with
respect to the house placement and protection of the wetland
fringe on the property.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact
this office.
Very. truly yours,
Albert J. Krupski, Jr.
Vice-President, Board of Trustees
AJK: j mt
cc: Roy Reynolds
Joseph Zevits
Board Of Southold Town Trustees
SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK
PERMIT NO ...... ;~.?.(~.C~ ................. DATE: ,..
ISSUED TO JOSEPH ZEVTTS ......................
Au 'horiza io.
Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of
the State of New York, 1893; and Chapter 404 of the Laws of the
'State of New York 1952; and the Southold Town Ordinance en-
titled "REC=ULATINC= AND THE PLACINg= OF OBSTRUCTIONS
IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the
REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM
LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the
Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting held on M~¥....2.5.~.~...~.98.8
19 ............ , and in consideration of the sum of $ ............................ paid by
of ................................................................ N Y. and subject to the
Terms and Conditions listed o~ th;' reverse side hereof,
of Southold Town Trustees authorizes and permits the following:
To co9nstruct 4' x 8' walkway, 4' x 10' ramp, 4' x 15'float,
install pilings as plan submitted.
all in accordance with the detailed specifications as presented in
the originating application. '
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees kere-
by causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents
be subscribed by a maiority of the~aid Board as of.this dat, e~
/
TERMS and CONDITIONS
The Permktee JOSEPH ZEVITS
residing at Little Peconic Bay Lane~ Southold~ N.Y. N. ¥., as
part of the consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and prescribe to the fol-
lowing: The Southold Town Trustees Permit must be prominently
displaye.d on p. remises effected during period of work.
1. That me said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold axe released from any and
all damages, or claims for damages, of suits arising directly or indirectly as a result of any oper-
ation performed pursuant to this permit, and the said Permi~tee will, at his or her own expense,
defend any and all such suits initiated by third parties, and the said Permittee assmnes fall ~ty
with respect thereto, .to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold
24
2. That this Permit is valid for a period of . mos. which is considered to be the
estimated time required to complete the work involved, but should circumstances warrant, request
for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date.
3. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely, or as long as the said Permi~tee wishe~
to maintain the structure or project involved, to provide evidence to anyone concerned that auth-
orization was originally obtained.
4. That ,the work involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or
its agents, and non-compliance with the provisions of the originating application, may be cause for
revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board.
5. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work
herein authorized.
6. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along
the beach between high and low water marks.
7. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations
in the location of the work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the
work shall cause unreasonable obstructaon to free navigation, the said Permittee will be reqnired~
upon due notice, to remove or alter this work or project herein stated without expenses to the Town
of Southold.
8. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee ot the completion of the work auth-
orized.
9. That the Permittee will obtain ali other permits and consents ,that may be reqdred sul>
plemental to this permit which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same.
FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President
ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President
JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III
JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR.
HENRY P. SMITH
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1892
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
~May 26, 1988 ~,
Mr. Joseph Zevits
2470 Rossett St.
Fort Lee, New Jersey
07024
Re: Application No. 610 - 1000-090-1-13
Dear Mr. Zevits:
The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during
their regular meeting held on May 25, 1988 as follows:
WHEREAS, Joyce and Joseph Zevits applied to the Southold Town Trustees
for a permit
under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of
Southold, application dated January 29, 1988, and
WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town
Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and
recommendations, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with
respect to said application on May 25, 1988 at which time all interested
persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and
WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and WHEREAS,
the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted
concerning this application, and
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not
affect the health, safety and general Welfare of the people of the town,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED that Joyce and Joseph Zevits BE AND HEREBY IS GRANTED
THE TOW~L-CkE~SQUTHOLD TO: As amended: to construct_~4 xl8 'tationary
walkway,(~?~yamp with a 4' x 15' float secured by~ This
permit is ~i~ with the provision that the catwalk i~-~X/tende-d landward
of the wetland line and a 25 ft. vegetated buffer zone is to be maintained
landward of the mhw. Property is located on Lot No. 31, Little Peconic
Bay Lane, Southold.
This permit will expire two years from the date it is signed if work has
Joyce and Joseph Zevits Page 2.
not commenced by said date. There are two inspections required and the
Trustees are to be notified upon the completion of the work.
Prior to the issuance of said permit by the Clerk, the applicant
shall file with the Clerk a certificate that he has public liability insurance
policies insuring against any liability which may arise
in the performance of the operations pursuant to such permit in such amount
as shall be fixed by the Trustees, which said policies shall name the Town
as a name insured. Please take further notice that
this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any
other department or agency which may also have an application pending
for the same or similar project.
Please return to the Building Dept. for a determination on the need
of any other permits that may be required for this project.
The following fees are now due and payable:
10' x 4' walkway~f~ 40 sq. ft. @ $1.00 per sq. ft. =
4' x 15' float 60 sq. ft. @ " " " " =
@ $25. O0
)~pilings
Wetland Inspection fees / ~
Total due:
$40.00
60.00
/~.0.00
10 J00
Very truly yours,
Board of Town Trustees
FAK: ip
Commissioner Thomas C. Jorling, D.E.C., Albany
Stephen Mars, Army Corps of Engineers
Thomas Hart, Coastal Management
John Holzapfel, Chairman, Southold Town C.A.C
Victor Lessard, Admin., Building Dept.
Planning Board
Board of Appeals
file
March 24, 1988 - Pag~
On a::motion made by John Holzapfel, seconded by John Tuthill it was
RESOLVED to recommend to the Southoid Town Trustees that Wetland Application
No. 610 of Joseph and Joyce Zevits be tabled pending clarification of the location
of the wells and cesspool system. Little Peconic Bay Lane, Southold.
Vote of Council: Ayes: All
Motion carried.
On a motion by John Holzapfel, seconded by JOhn Tuthill, it was
RESOLVED to recommend to the Southoid Town Trustees approval of the Wetland
Application No. 611 of Edward Deutsch to construct a fixed elevated walkway,
hinged ramp, two floats with pilings. The CAC approves with the stipulation
that there will be no off road parking, which woul-d result in harm to the marsh.
Cedar Beach Road, Suuthold
Vote of Council: Ayes:'AII
Motion carried.
On a motion by Heather Tetrault, seconded by Margaret Feeney, it was
RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of Wetland
float. Application No. 612 of Arnold Blair to add to an existing dock a ramp and
Vanston & Sunset Road, Cutchogue
Vote of Council: Ayes: All'
Motion carried.
DISTRIBUTION OF NEW APPLICATIONS
NO. 614 - Oyster Farm Associates by Neted of America, Ltd. by Henry E. Rayno~
to dredge, enlarge bulkhead existing marina basin.
East side of Shipyard Lane, East Marion
Group Inspection
No. 615 - Bernard and Carole Kiernan by Garrett A. Strang to'construct catwa3
dock and floating dock. _
North Parish Drive, Southold
Daniel Kujawski inspection
No. 616 - John C. Vassil for Costello Marine Contracting Corp. to replace
'existing bulkhead, in kind, in place.
Salt Lake Lane and James Creek, Mattituck.
Margaret Feeney inspection
No. 617 - Janet Swanson by En-Consultants, Inc. toc¢onstruct 100' of timber
retaining wall with two 15' angled returns.~ Wall to be approximate
4' north of toe of bluff and landward of MHW. Wail will be
armored with approximately 40 c~y. of i000 to 1000 lb stone.
Ryder Farm Lame, Orie.mt ~
Group inspection
No. 618 -Wilheim Frankeh~by j. H. Geideman to dredge approximately 300± c.y.
Maintenance dredge, fill to upland site by contractor.
965 Osprey Nest Road, Greenport.
John Tuthilt inspection
q~'~-~OARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, $3095 Main Road
~/~ P.O. Box 728 '
Southold, New York 11971
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1892
APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT
PURSUANT TO THE LAWS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE
COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS
OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS PURSUANT
TO CHAPTER 32 OF THE CODES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD.
APPLICATION NO.
DATE OF APPLICATION //27/~
I DENT I TY OF APPL I CANT_~JOSEp_}~__.g[_~i_T_S_a4%(~, jOZC~_._Zj~LLT_S__~_2_0_~_~4_4__90g0.PHONE NO
ADDRESS OF -APPL ~ CANT___2__4_ZO_Rasxe. t_t_.S.tr_ee_L___
TAX MAP NO. _SJJLf2[0._lk__C(l~_T3× Map No._ 100O_-_0_qO=l-_L3
AGENT
PHONE NO.
PERMIT REQUESTED
LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR WHICH PERMIT WANTED_..I._0I_~13i~.._L[ttle__~=.F_.0~ic_ ........
HOME ADDRESS OF PERMIT APPLICANT IF DIFFERENT FROM AFORESAID LOCATION
CREEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY_~oq~_La~_e.__
SIZE OF PROPOSED
LENGTH
H~IGHT ABOVE HIGH WATER
DEPTH BELOW LOW WATER 0
YARDS TO BE EXCAVATED a~proximately. 175 cu. yds.
YARDS TO BE FILLED none
W I DTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAY FRONT I NG PROPERTY 103 ft.
DEPTH AT LOW. TIDE 0
AVERAGE R I SE I N T ! DE___a_p]_),r0ximately_2~_ft.
DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST CHANNELO_p__pr0×. 500 FT.
DISTANCE pROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN THE AREA
Is THIS FOR PRIVATE OR BUSINESS USE?.__. ~o;Pivate
AREA ZONING Residential
0
MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED Bu1]dozer
INTENDED USE OF pRopERTY___~private residence
DESCRIBE ANY KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISE
L i m i t_e_d_ La_n_d_cl e a_r_i_n~,
AND WHETHER ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMITS HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO ERRECT
STRUCTURES OR TO DREDGE OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID pREMISES AND WHETHER
ANY PERMITS OR LICENSES WERE EVER SUSPENDED OR REVOKED BY A GOVERNMENTAL
AGENCY DEC Permit
DESCriBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION AND pROPOSED CONDITION OF THE
PREMISES AFTER THE WORK IS COMPLETED INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF
THE PROJECT SITE IF NECESSARY__~.S_~Lde~LI_~0_DI~
WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, iF NOT THE SAME AS THE
APPLICANT.___..~_
ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED THAT WOULD
PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT? None
14,q 6~2 (2/87)-- 7c
617.21
Appendix A SEQR
State Environmental Quality Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project
or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent-
ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically e.xpert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge In one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action.
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 ant]' 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-
large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact is actually important. '
Identify the
Upon review
information,
lead agency
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Actions
Portions-of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 []Part 3
of the informatio~ recorded on this EAF {Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact it is reasonably determined by the
that:
[] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one Which Will not
have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
I-]- B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
.......... effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.*
[] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.
* A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Application f6r Permit to constrUct a residential
~age.
home & small catwalk & float for
JOSEPH ZEVITS / JOYCE ZEVITS
Name of Action
Name of Lead Agency
(Same as above)
Print or Type Na~e of Resp~onsible Officer in Lead Agency
~t~at.~f Respo~.ib~j~e~r' ~ Lead Agency
(San!e as above)
Title of Responsible Officer
Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer)
'Date ~' ~
1
PART 1--PROJECT INFOKMATION ' '
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effec
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considere
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition~
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involv
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specif
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
Construction of a r,~sidential home and small catwalk and float for boa't dockage
LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County)
Little Peconic Bay Lanes $outhol'~
NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR I BUSINESS TELEPHONE
JuSE~H Z~]VIIS / ,]0Y~E Z~VIiS
ADDRESS
~7~ Kossett Street
CITY/PO t STATE
Fort Lee,
NAME OF OWNER (If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE
(Same as above) (201) 944-9080
ZIP CODE
ADDRESS
(Same as above)
CiTY/PO
STATE ZIP CODE
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
Construct a resSdential home and small catwalk and float for boat dockage
Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: i-[Urban i-llndustrial l-lCommercial ~Residentia[ (suburban)
~Rural (non-farm
F3Forest I-I~griculture ~lOther
2 Total acreage of project area: less than 1 acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) nor~
Forested rio ne
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland pasture, etc.) none
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) none
no n e
Water Surface Area
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill)
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces
Other (Indicate type).
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: 100
topsoil
~Wel[ drained % of ~ite
~Poorly drained % of site
less than 1
~lone
PRESENTLY
and ~and
AFTER COMPLETION
acres acres
acres acres
acres acres
acres acres
acres acres
acres less than 1 acres
acres ~ acres
acres acres
E~Moderately well drained
% of site
b. If any agricultural land is involved,
Land Classification System? N/~ acres. (See1 NYCRR 370).
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project ~ite? I~.Yes E~No
a. What is depth .to bedrock? N/A (in feet)
2
how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NY',
5. 'Approximate percentage of pro~,sed project site with slopes: ~0-10% % [10-15% %
~' 1-115 % or greater
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain ~ building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? [l-lYes [~No
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? I-lYes )~No
8. What is the depth of the water table? 10 ~t,, (in feet)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? l-lYes []No
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? []Yes [No
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
I--lYes [~No According to
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
F-lYes E~No Describe
,13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
I-lYes ~No If yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? I-lYes -)(1 No
1,5. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
17.
a. Name Wo_~, t
Is the site served by~xisting public utilities? I-lYes
a) If Yes, does sufficient caF~acity exist to allow connection?
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection?
b. Size (In acres) IJp. k~ewri
-1Yes I~No
I~Yes ~No
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 304? F3Yes E~No
19. Is tl~e site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Yes E~No
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? i-lYes E~No
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsorlesg than 1acres ....
b. Project acreage to be developed:leSS 1;hat1 ½acres initially; less f, harl ~ acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped less ~chari ~cres.
d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (I.f appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %;
f. Number of off-street parking' spaces existing N/A ; proposed N/A
ri0 lie
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)?
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
Ultimately I N/A N/A N/A
i. Dimensions: (in feet)of largest proposed structure ctP~gX'height; approx.40 ~ width; app~'0x30 I 'length.
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? N,/A. ft. -.
3
2. How much natural material (i,e.. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? none
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? i-lYes I-INo ~N/A
a. If yes, for what intend~j purpose is the site being reclaimed?
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? E~Yes []No
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for rec amation? ~Yes [-INo
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? -0-
' acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
[l-lYes I~No ·
approx.
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction
7. If multi-phased: N/A
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month
d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [l-lYes
8. Will blasting occur during construction? [l-lYes [No
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction approx.
20
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?
tons/cubic ,yards
months, (including demolition).
year, (including demolition).
year:
after project is complete
I-lYes E~No If yes, explain
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [l-lYes []No
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste d_isposal involved? I~Yes []No Type Sewage
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? I-lYes
Explain
[~No
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain?
16. Will the proJect generate solid waste? ~3Yes [No
a. If yes, what is the amount per month 0 tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? F-lYes
c. If yes, g~ve name ;
d.
[~No
location
[]Yes E~No
Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary andfill?
If Yes, explain
[]Yes
~]No
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste?
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal?
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? urlkrlown
18. Will
19. Will
20. Will
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use?
If yes , indicate type(s)
i~Yes E]No
0
tons/month.
years.
project use herbicides or pesticides? [l-lYes ~No
project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ~]Yes
project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels?
[Yes ~No
[~No
~Yes
~No
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity approx.
23. Total anticipated water usage per day approx. 45 gallons/day.
24. Does project-involve Local, State or Federal funding? []Yes
If Yes, explain
gallons/minute.
~]No
252 ~.ApprovaJs Required:
City, Town, Village Board [~Yes F~No
City, Town, Village Planning Board []Yes ~No
City, Town Zoning Board [~Yes E3No
City, County Health Department l~Yes F-tNo
Other Local Agencies E~Yes F-1No
Other Regional Agencies []Yes ~No
State Agencies I~Yes I-INo
Federal Agencies [Yes ~No
C. Zoning and Planning Information
Type
Bldg. Permit
Water & Sewage
Southol.d Trustees
Submittal
Date
ASAP
~ _
ASAP
DEC ~ppruwd -
7/87 _
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? E3Yes [~No
If Yes, indicate decision required: ~
[]]zoning amendment [-Izoning variance I-lspecial use permit fi]subdivision ]]]site plan
[]new/revision of master plan I--lresource management plan []]other
2. What is the zoning ciassification(s)of the site? R~siden't~al
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
Residential Home -
4. What is the proposed zonir~g of the site? RmR1dmntial
· 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
(~am~ a_~ ab0-v~ '
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~Yes
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 'A mile radius of proposed action?
Res i den ti al
fi]No
8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ~¼ mile? EgYes
9. If the proposed action is the subdiwsion of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A
a. Wha~ is (he minimum lot size proposed?
10~ Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water di'stricts? [-]Yes ~l~No
11. Willfire protection)?the proposed actionF_lYes create[~Noa demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? []Yes
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? fi-lYes ~No
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? EYes ENo
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your aro_'ect. If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which y6u propose to mitigate or
avoid them. '
E. Verification
I certify that'the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant,pon~a~r ~ame..d0SEPH ZEV[-TS / J0~YCE ZEVi. TS
If the actio~ is !n th~oastai Aret ~%~ ar~ a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding
with this as~essmen .~ ~'- ~
§
Ps 2--PROJI~CT IMPACTS AND Ti .JR MAGNITUDE
Responsibility of Lead Agency
General Information (Read Carefully)
· In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations beer
reasonable~. The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst.
· Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant.
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simpI,,
asks that it be looked at further.
* The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever, possible the threshold of
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throu§hout the .State anF~
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate
for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3.
· The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and
have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question.
· The number of examoles per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
' In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. -- ~
Instructions {Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there'will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the
impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3.
e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate
impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This
must be explained in Part 3.
IMPACT ON LAND
I. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site?
[]NO []YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater. (15 foot rise per 100
foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed
10%.
· Construction on land'where the depth to the water table is less than
3 feet.
· Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles.
· Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within
3 feet of-existing ground surface.
· Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more
than one phase or stage.
· Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000
tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year.
· Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill.
· Construction in a designated floodway.
· Other impacts
2· Will there be an effect t.'. .... ~y umque or unusual land forms found on
the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geol°gical formations, etc.)~NO I~YES
· Specific land f~)rms:
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project .Change
I
r'" [] ~Yes l-]No
[] [] [-]Yes [--I No
L-] [] l--lYes E~]No
[] [] []Yes [-]No
[] [] []Yes [--]No
[] [] [--]Yes }--I No
[] [] I~]Yes []No
[] [] I-]Yes- []No
[] [] [--]Yes [--]No
[] [] [~Yes [--]No
IMPACT' ON WATER
3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected?
{Under Articles 1.5, 24, 2,5 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL)
E~YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Developable area of site contains a protected water body.
· Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a
protected stream.
· Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body.
· Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland.
· Other impacts: Nnnc_
4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body
of water~
· [~NO [Z]YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
· Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area.
· Other impacts:
5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater
quality or quantity? I~,'~O [Z]YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action willzequire a discharge permit.
· Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not
have approval to serve proposed (project) action.
Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45
gallons per minute pumping capacity.
Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water
supply system.
Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater.
Liquid effluent Will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
Proposed Action would use water iff excess of 20,000 gallons per
day.
Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an
existing body of water to t~,e exEent that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
Proposed Action will reqmre the storage of petroleum or chemical
products greater than 1,100 gallons.
Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water
and~or sewer services.
Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which mav
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage
facil ties.
· Other impacts:_
6 Will proposed action alter drai'nage flow or pattern, s, or surface
water runoff? I~NO EYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action would change flood water flows.
7
1
Small to
Moderate
Impact
2
Potential
Large
Impact
3
Can Impact B
Mitigated By
Project Chang
[~/Yes I--]No
J-[Yes [-1No
[~Yes [--J No
l--lYes I-]No
[~Yes I-]No
[~/Yes [--]No
[~]Yes L_~No
[--]Yes [--INo
[~]Yes I--]No
]--[Yes [~]No
L--/Yes J--JNo
[~]Yes [~]No
~--[ Yes [~No
F-lYes ~]No
[~Yes [--]No
[-/Yes J~]No
[~]Yes- [~No
[~]Yes [-]No
[~Yes
fi]Yes I-]No
[~]Yes [-']No
· Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion.
· Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns.
· Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will proposed action affect air quality? FXlNO E]YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given
hour.
o Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of
refuse per hour. ~
· Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a
heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour.
· Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed
to industrial use.
· Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial
development within existing industrial areas.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered
species? F)(]NO F-lYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site.
· Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat.
· Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other
than for agricultural purposes.
· Other impacts:
9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or
non-endangered species? E~NO l-lYES
·
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or
migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species.
· Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres
of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important
vegetation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10. Will the Proposed Action affect a§ricultural land resources?
· EgNO l-lYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural
land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.)
Small to Potential Can Impact'i~e
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] i~Yes [--INo
"[--] [] l-lYes []No
[] [] []Yes · [-[No
[] [] - []Yes I-]No
I
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes [-]No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] [--]Yes r-]No
[] [] l-lYes [-1No
[] [] []Yes _[]No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] [--]Yes []No
· Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of
agricultural land.
· The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres
of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more
than 2.5 acres of agricultural land.
· The proposed action wou Id disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural
land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
Other ~mpacts:
iMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? I~NO I-IYES
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21,
Appendix B.)
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether
man-made or natural.
· Proposed land uses. or project components visible to users of
aesthetic resources--which will eliminate or significantly reduce their
enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
· Project components that Will result in the elimination or significant
screening of scenic views known to be important to the area.
· Other ~mpacts:
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre-
historic or paleontological importance? ~NO I-lYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially
contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register
of historic places.
· Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the
project site.
· Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for
archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory.
· Other impacts:_.
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or
future open spaces or recreational ol~portunities?
Examples that would apply to column 2 UNO I-lYES
· The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity.
· A major reduction of an open space important to the community.
· Other impacts:
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] J']Yes [-1No
[] [] F-lYes I--INo
[] [] F-lYes I--1No
[] [~]. [-]Yes ['-]No
[] [] I-lYes [-INo
[] [] ~Yes I::]No
[] [] [:]Yes [~No
[] [] [~Yes [~]No
[] [] E3Yes I-1No
[] [] ~¥es r--INo
[] [] E-JYes t--lNo
[] [] F'lYes I:]No
[] [] ~Yes E3No
[] [] [~Yes [:]No
[] [] I-lYes [--INo
9
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION
14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems?
[X-I N O []YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods.
· Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or
energy supply? [~NO -IYES
£xamples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of
any form of energy in the municipality.
· Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.
· Other impacts:
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result
of the Proposed Action? [XlNO -1YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive
facility.
· Odors will occur routine]y (more than one hour per day).
· Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local
ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures.
· Pr'0posed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a
noise screen.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety?
E~NO [Z]YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances (i~e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Pow level
discharge or emission.
· Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any
form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, .radioactive, irritating,
infectious, etc.)
· Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural
gas or other flammable liquids.
· Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance
within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous
waste~
· Other impacts:
10
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
impact Impact Project Chang(
~ [] [] fl-lYes F-INo
[] [] I-lYes [:]No
[] '[~ []Yes [--[ No~
[] [] r-lYes i--lNo
[] [] []Yes E~No
[] [] i-lYes I--]No
[] [] [-]Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] E3Yes []No
[] FI, []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes I-~No
[] [] []Yes []NO
-_[] [] []Yes []No
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD
18 Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community?
~NO E3YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the
project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%.
· The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services
will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project.
· Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals.
· Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use.
· Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures
or areas of historic importance to the community.
· Development will create a demand for additional community services
(e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.)
· Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects.
· Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment-
· Other impacts:
19.
I 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] [] I--~[Yes I-]No
[] [] ' []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] [~]Yes []No
[] -~[]' []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes ]-1No
[] [] E~]Yes I-'1 No
[] [] []Yes r-]No
Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to
potential adverse environmental impacts? I~NO I-lYES
if Any Action in Part 2 is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or
If You Cannot Determine the [Vlagnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE I~IPORTANCE OF
· ' Responsibility of Lead Agency
Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be
mitigated.
Instructions
Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2:
1. Briefly describe the impact.
2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s).
3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. '
To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring
· The duration of the impact
· Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value .-
· Whether the impact can or will be controlled '
· The regional consequence of the impact
· Its potential divergence from local needs and goals
· Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact.
(Continue on attachments)
,4.~4.~ ,2,s7)-9c 617.21 SEQR
Appendix B
State Environmental Quality Review
Visu t EAF Addendum
This form may be-used to provide additional information relat, ing to Question 11 of Part 2 of
the Full EAF.
(To be completed by Lead Agency)
Distance Between
Project and Resource (in Miles)
0-x/4 t/4 - I/2 1/2-3 3-5 5+
[] [] E [] []
· Local road?
Visibility
1. Would the project be visible from:
* A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available
to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation
of natural or man-made scenic qualities?
· An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public [] []~- [] O []
observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural
or man-made scenic qualities? ~.
o A site or structure listed on the National or State O [] [] [] []
Registers of Historic Places?
~ State Parks? [] [] O [] []
· The State Forest Preserve? [] [] [] [] []
o National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? [] [] [] [] []
o National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding [~ [] O [] []
natural features?
o National Park Ser~i~e lands? [] [] [] [] []
~ Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic O O [] [] []
or Recreational?
· Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such [] [] [] [] []
as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak?
~ A governmentally established or designated interstate [] [] [] [- []
or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for
establishment or designation?
· A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as [] O --] [] []
scenic?
· Municipal park, or designated open space? [] O [] [] []
· County road? '- [] [] [] [] [~"
· State? [] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other
seasons)
[]Yes E~]No
3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year
during which the projOct will De visible?
.OYes []NO
DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT
4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding
environment.
Within
'1/4 mile * 1 mile
Essentially undeveloped [] []
Forested [] []
Agricultural [] []
Suburban residential [] []
Industrial [] []
Commercial [] []
Urban [] [--].
River, Lake, Pond [] []
Cliffs, Overlooks [] []
Designated Open Space []
Flat" -- [] · []
Hilly [] []
Mountainous [] []
Other []
NOTE: add attachments as needed
5. Are there visually similar projects within:
* 1/2 mile [] Yes [] No
* 1 miles []Yes ~-]No
*2 miles -['-lYes []No
*3 .miles [] Yes [] No
* Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate.
EXPOSURE
6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is approx. !00
NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate.
CONTEXT
7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is
FREQUENCY
Holidays/
Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally
Travel to and from work [] [] [] []
Involved in recreational activities [] ~- [] []
Routine travel by residents [] [] [] []
At a residence [] [] [] -}'X]
At worksite [] [] [] [--}
Other [] [] [] []
2
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK )
STATE OF NEW YORK )SS:
AND THAT ALL STATEMENTB CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST
OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THAT THE WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE
MANNER SET FORTH IN TH'IS APPLICATION A~D AS MAY BE APPROVED BY
THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGR£ES TO
HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND
FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY
VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GRANTED.
in completing this application I hereby authorize the Trusteesj
agent or representative to enter onto my property to inspect the
premises in conjunction with. rev~w~o~s~p_Dlic/ation.~~ / /~b~ ~~' ~
DAY OF , ]9 ~
NOTANY PUBLIC
EXAMINED
APPROVED "WETLANDS" PERMIT (CHAPTER 97)
APPROVED "BOAT,DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32)
DISAPPROVED "WETLANDS PERMIT" (CHAPTER 97)
DISAPPROVED "BOATS,DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32)
CONDITIONS, IF ANY
EXAMINING BODY
SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN
COMPUTATION OF FEES'
Approved 2~27/85
Joseph Zevits
8r~ ~ ....
Fort Lee~ New Jersey 07024
(-o~ 944-9~mn
January 25, i988
Mr= Henry P~ Smith~ President
Board of Town Trustees
Town of Southo!d
53~95 Main Road
Southold~ New York i197i
Dear Mr= Smith:
Wi th ..... ~-- -
....... ~ .... on on m~ appl ~-- ~ ~ ~ '
. ~u~o~.~ enciose~ is the following:
a copy of the survey depicting the location of my house as approved ~.
the NYSDEP and a f!oatsnn .... u~e survev~ please Ysnd a
'~ o~u~ Attached to ~ .. -
detailed descriDtion of the dock construction~
Trustino that this information is in accordance ~ith your requi ........ ~
~ ~em~~
~ remain~
yours,
L i T~L~
.L '/'TTL ~
!>J: ?