Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWOOLDRIDGE, LINDAFRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 August 31, 1988 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Glenn Just J.M.O. Consulting North Country Road Box 361 Wading River,~w YO~ 11792 Re: Wooldridge - 1000-007-3-3.15 Dear Mr. Just: Please be advised that the Trustees inspecte~f the above referenced property on August 3, 1988 and it was ~etermined that the work proposed is within our jurisdiction. Please advise this office as you acquire otb}er permits as may be necessary for this project. ery truly yours, 4 1/' /. / Frank A. ku~aws, kJ., Jr. President Board of Tdwn T:ustees FAK:ip cc: Bldg. Dept. file N. COUNTRY RD. · BOX 361 W '" ADING RIVER, N.Y. 11792 (516) 929-3575 July 5, 1988 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Mr. Frank Kujawski Re: Request for Determination of Jurisdiction Wooldridge- Fishers Island S.C.T.M. No. 1000-007-3-3.15 Dear Mr. Kujawski: At this point in time, I am requesting a "Determination of Jurisdiction" for the above noted site. I have enclosed a completed application form and short environmental assessment form to aid your Board in making'this determination. As always, should you or any other member of th~ Board of Trustees or C.A.C. have any comments or questions with regards to this matter, kindly contact this office at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your continued cooperation. Very truly yours, Gl'ehn E. ~ GEJ/Be Enc. FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 July 12, 1988 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Larry Penny 1453 Noyac Road Sag Harbor, New York 11963 Dear Mr. Penny: Transmitted herewith for your inspection and recommendation regarding Trustees jurisdiction are the followingigppl~cations: J.M.O. Consulting for Patricia Pierce - 1000-3-5-5.2 J.M.O. Consulting for Linda F. Wooldridge - 1000-007-3-3.15 Please submit your comments at the earliest possible date. Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact this office at the telephone number listed above. Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski,'Jr. -- President ~ Board of Town TrUsteeS FAK:ip Attachments cc: Judge Raymond Edwards, F.I. Trustees J.M.O. Consultingt/ file FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 September 6, 1988 TELEPHONE (516) 76§-1892 Mr. Robert A. Greene Alternate Regional Permit Administrator New York State D.E.C. Bldg. 40, SUNY, Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Re: Application No. 652 - Linda F. Wooldridge - 1000-007-3-3.15 Dear Mr. Greene: Please be advised that this office has received a partial application in the above referenced matter. It is noted that this project is a Type I Action according to the iS,C.D.H.S., as advised by the Building Department (see copy of map attached). Pursuant to the Code of the Town of Southold, the Board of Town Trustees will not act upon an application until .it is deemed complete by the submission of documentary proof that all other necessary permits and approvals have been received. Please keep this office informed of your prcigress in this matter. We wish to be involved in your environm¢~'!Skal review under the S.E.Q.R.A. ~ ~ ~'~ · .ueg~ ~ ~a ~1~. · Feel free to contact this office at (516) 765-1932 should you have any questions in regard to this matter. FAK:ip Attachment cc: {.[ery truly yQurs,/~ , .J-~rank A. /Kuj/aWSki, Jr., Pres. · Board of To~n '~r'~ist~es J.M.O. Consultants, Inc. for Linda F. Wooldridge Army Corps of Engineers New York State Dept. of State Bldg. Dept. Conservation Advisory Council Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 September 6, 1988 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Glenn Just J.M.O. Consulting North Country Road Box 361 Wading River, New York 11792 Re: Wooldridge- Appl. No. 652 Dear Mr. Just: Please be advised that according to our records, an application fee of $150.00 has not been submitted to this office for the above referenced application. In addition to this a long assessment form will be needed also. We would appreciate your remittance at the earliest possible date. As always, thank you for your cooperation to this matter. Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr.,~;Pres. Ilene Pfifferlir~g,'Clerk ~' Board of Town Trustees ip cc: file j.m.o, consulting box 361 · north country road wading river, n.y. 11792 (516) 929-~S7S tei£~ax (~16) 929,~621 October 20, 1988 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Re: Mr. Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. Wooldridge, Fishers Island S.C.T.M. No. 1000-007-3-3.15 Dear Mr. Kujawski: Please be advised that I had requested a "Deter~i~nauion of Jurisdiction" for the above noted parcel on Jul~ 5, 1988 (copy enclosed). You then inspected the site along w~'"i~i other members of the Board of Trustees and Mr. Charles T. Ham~L;ton of the N.Y.S.D.E.C. and myself on August 3, 1988. At C?~at time we noted the wetlands line that I had falgged, whi~ w~ depicted on the survey which accompanied my request on Jciy 5, 1988. At that time it was noted that someone else had fl~gged a line on the site. You, Mr. Hamilton and I discussed ~?~is matter and we seemed to be in agreement that my line w.2s accurate but as Mr. Hamilton stated, he would feel more comfc3table in not making a decision at the present time, but woul~ rather leave that decision up to 'the freshwater wetlands insp.~ctors from - the N.Y.S.D.E.C. staff. I then received a letter from you dated August 31, 1988 (copy enclosed), which stated ttlat the project was in the Trustees' jurisdiction This was based on Mr. Penny's as~ociate's line. I then received a letter from Mrs. Pfifferling dated September 6, 1988 (copy enclosed) which stated that an appl~ication fee and "Full Environmental Assessment Form" were no.~ needed. I also received a copy of a letter dated September 6, 1988 from you to Mr. Robert Greene of the N.Y.S.D.E.C. (copy enclosed) which stated that the proposed project is a Type I Action deemed by the S.C.D.H.S. as advised by the Building Department. It was also noted that the Trustees will not act on the application by the submission of the documentary proof that ~iZ. other necessary permits and approvals have been issue~ I am enclosing a copy of a letter from the N.Y.~.D.E.C. signed by Mr. Greene and dated September 27, 1988. Kir~ly note that the letter states that the "The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has determined that ,%.he project is - more that 100' from Freshwater Wetlands and therefore, no permit under Article 24 (Freshwater Wetlands~ of the Environmental Conservation Law is necessary.,, ~.Zso, please note that this letter from the N.Y.S.D.E.c' referenced the survey dated June 17, 1988 (copy enclosed) and that this is the same exact survey which I originally submitted to the Trustees on July 5, 1988. Furthermore, the original freshwater wetlands line which I flagged and is depicted on said survey, is true and accurate and that the freshwater wetlands inspectors were in agreement with me. Now, we seem to be in a very difficult bind. One agency's freshwater wetlands inspectors agrees with the or'ginal line and issues the necessary approval based on said tine. The other agency's environmental consultant flags an©ther line. One agency says that the project, as proposed, is located 103' from the freshwater wetlands line he agrees with. The other is of a different opinion. I would appreciate you scheduling me a short period of time at the next work session to discuss this matter. GEJ/te Enc. FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Sonthold, New York 11971 Nov. 1, 1988 Mr. Glenn Just J.M.O. Consulting North Country Road- Box 361 Wading River, N.Y. 11792 Re: Woolridge Appl. No 652- water supply Dear Mr. Just: Thank you for enlightening us and sharing information with us. Please be advised that we will not have jur~s,diction in this case. Very truly Frank A. Kujaw~ki, President Board of Trustees FAK:jas JAMES A. SCHONDEBARE TOWN AI'I'ORNEY ROBERT H. BERNTSSON ASSISTANT TOWN A'I'rORNEY OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road " ~P.O. Box 1179 Southold',~N'~York 1"1971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1939 January 23, 1989 Mr'. Walter G. Lindley Senior Environmental Planner Department of Health Services Suffolk County Center Riverhead, New York 11901 Re: Proposed Single Family Dwelling Adjacent to Barlow Pond, Fishers Island, for Linda Wooldridge SCTM #1000-007-03-003,15 Dear Mr. Lindley: The Town Board of the Town of Southoid has reviewed your letter of January 17, 1989. Before any Town board or agency can assume lead agency under SEQRA, an Environmental Assessment Form must be completed by the applicant and submitted to the Town. Please be advised that there is currently no application before any Town agency in relati~:~n to this project. Feel free to contact this office with any comments or questions. Very truly yours, Robert H. Berntsson Assistant Town Attorney RHB:rbw DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PaTRiCK G. HalPiN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DAVID HARRIS, M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER april 27, 1990 Glen Just, President JMO Consulting P.O. Box 447 Quogue, New York 11959 RE: Application of Woolridge, Fishers Island SCTM # 1000-07-03-3.15 SCDHS Application # 88-SO-161 Dear Mr. Just: As a follow up to our recent discussions, please be advised that the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) has received a Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) for the above-mentioned action, as required by our agency's procedures for implementing the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). The SCDHS has conducted a coordinated review of the subject proposal pursuant to the requirements of NYCRR, Part 617.6 of the NYCRR. The thirty day comment period has expired and there has been no objection raised regarding our agency's the initial disposition of intent to assume lead agency status. As a result, please be advised that the SCDHS has assumed lead agency status for the subject proposal. As lead agency, the SCDHS has completed the EAF Part 2 as required by NYCRR,Part 617.5 (5)(b) in an effort to make a determination of significance (see attached). Based on the materials and information reviewed, our agency has determined that at several of the potential impacts identified in the EAF Part 2 are large and may be significant. Also, we are concerned about the community's comments regarding this and other proposals in the Barlow Pond vicinity. As a result, our agency requests that you provide additional details pertaining to these potential impacts and recommendations for appropriate mitigation measures to assure that potential impacts are mitigated to the greatest degree practicable. COUNTY CENTER RIVERH£AD. N.Y. I 19OI Letter to (~len J[ist April 27, 1990 Page 2 Additional information should be provided in an Environmental Assessment Form Part 3, and provided to the SCDHS when it is complete. The principal areas we wish to see addressed in greater detail include the following: 1. All requirements of appropriate Articles of the NYSECL which may effect this proposal (Article 15 and 24) are most important to this discussion; 2. AdeqUate protection of surface and groundwater quality with attention to the any construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system; To the extent possible, an examination of the existing conditions of lands surrounding Barlow Pond and the potential for future development in its vicinity. The potential for cumulative impacts to this area is of great concern to our agency, and issues pertaining to comprehensive mitigation measures are important to our decision-making. It is our understanding that there is some public controversy over this proposal. To the extent practicable, we would like to have this issue discussed in the EAF part 3. As you are aware, we will await the requested information prior to rendering a determination of significance. Thank you for you attention to these concerns. Should you have any additional questions of concerns please feel free to contact me directly (548-3312). Sincerely, ~ Roy Reynolds, P.E Sr. Public Health Engineer Attachment CC: Paul Ponturo, P.E. Vito Minei, P.E. Al Krupski, Southold Town Trustees ~/ Valarie Scopaz, Southold Planning Department Robert Schneck, NYSDEC Steven Sanford, NYSDEC TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski, Jr. John L. Bednoski, Jr. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 May 1, 1990 TO: From: RE: Valerie Scopaz, Planning Board John M. Bredemeyer, III, President, Board of Trustees Linda F. Wooldridge, Fishers Island SCTM %1000-07-03-3.15 Pursuant to review of our files, please be advised that this project is beyond Trustee jurisdiction, and the Board has no objection to the S.C.D.H.S. assuming Lead Agency status. cc: Roy Reynolds, P.E./SCDHS Ray Edwards Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Tom Wickham Robert Greene/DEC CAC File Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ScoTr L. HARRIS Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Roy Reynolds, P.E. Sr. Public Health Engineer Department of Health Services Suffolk County Center Riverhead, NY 11901 April 3, 1990 RE: Woolridge, Fishers Island SCTM~ 1000-07-03-3.15 Dear Mr. Reynolds: As of yesterday morning, April 2nd, I received a verbal message from the President of the Town Trustees, Jay Bredemeyer, through his secretary that the Board of Trustees will be reviewing the above-noted application at their next meeting on April 25, 1990. I do not know what their concerns are regarding this application, nor whether they are asking for status in the environmental review. Presumably they will direct their comments to your office in writing after their April 25th meeting. If you wish to discuss the matter with Mr. Bredemeyer I suggest you contact him through the Trustee office at 765-1892. Very truly yours, Valerie Scopaz Town Planner cc: John M. Bredemeyer III, Board of Trustees Judge Ray Edwards, Councilman Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman, Planning Board Tom Wickham, Chairman, Planning & Zoning Committee Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P,O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 SCOTt L. HARRIS Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Marc~ 20, 1990 Roy Reynolds, P.E. Sr. Public Health Engineer Department of Health Services Suffolk County Center Riverhead, New York 11901 Re: Application of Woolridge, Fishers Island SCTM ~ 1000-07-03-3.15 Dear Mr. Reynolds, The Planning Board reviewed your letter requesting our position regarding the designation of lead agency status in the review of the above-referenced proposal. This agency has no objections to the assumption of lead agency by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. We are also in agreement with your designation of the project as "a Type I action with a possible significant impact." It is requested that your agency take a careful look at this proposal because of its location adjacent to the public water supply reservoir of Barlow Pond. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact Valerie $copaz, Town Planner, of this office. Very Truly Yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Judge Ray Edwards, Councilman Trustees, John M. Bredemeyer III '~/ DEP~RTMENT OF HE:ALTH SE::RVlC:E:S COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DAVID HARRIS, M.D,, M.P.H. COMMISSIONER February.20, 1990 To: Robert Schneck, NYSDEC Steven Sanford, NYSDEC Valerie Scopaz, Town of Southold Planning Department Application of WoOlridge, Fishers Island SCTM # 1000-07-03-3.15 SCDHS Application # 88-SO-161 Dear Sir/Madam: The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) has received an application for the above-referenced action. The subject parcel is located within 200 feet of Barlow Pond which is a surface water reservoir for Fishers Island. According the SCDHS procedures for implementation of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), this project constitutes a Type I action with a possible significant impact. As an agency involved in approving this action, K..ou~4~r~.~b~,~g~[[&~tgjO._~..,~.p.:gr ~ition regarding the d?si~ation of lead a enc there ' assu"~'~'e fSa~ agency status. ~m~o~.~ .... ~0..~ ......... ~, A copy of the completed Long Environmental Assessment Form is enclosed for your review. Please respond within 30 days of the date of this mailing to the Bureau of Wastewater Management. cc: Paul Ponturo, P.E. COUNTY C~'NT£R RIVERH~"..AD. N.Y. 11901 Roy Reynolds, P.E . PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION' Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This documen~ is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed ma.y have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these qu'estions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. "NAM~ OF ACTION Prnpn.~H .~in~l~ F~milv rm~irtPnrp LOCATION OF ACTIOUN (Include Sit'el Address. Municipality ~nd Counly) NAME OF APPLICAN~PONSOR ~ - - - ADDRESS CI~/PO Quo,~m NAME OF OWNER (If different) : L~nda R. Wooldr~dge ADDRESS 437 Madison CI~IPO ~ew ~o~k DESCRIPTION OF ACTION "See At tached" BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( 516) 653-0607 I STATE I ZIP CODE w v 1~959 BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( 21 ?.) AR6-98nn STATE I ZIP CODE N_Yl 1D~99, Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project botl~'de~;21oped and undevel'0ped areas. .1. Present land use: [-JUrban F_llndustrial E-_lCommercial . ~Forest I-1Agriculture ~0~ther 2. Total acreage of project area: 0.998 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 1~ acres Forested 0. 998 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) ~ acres Wetland [Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) ~ acres Water Surface Area ~ acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0.006 acres Other (Indicate type). ~ acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site~ a? Soil drainage: I~Well drained 100 % of site I-1Residential (suburban) [~Rural (non-farm} AFTER COMPLETION ~ acres O. 096 acres acres ' ~ acres ~ · acres {~ acres' O. 096 acres ~ acres I-IModeratelv well drained % of site, IL}Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are Classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the Ni'S Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppinRs on project site? F-lYes .... ~ hat is depth to bedrock~ Unknown (in feet) 5.',~ppro~imate percentage of proposed p~oject site with slopes: []0-10% 100 % t-'110-15% ~ % I-]15% or greater % 6'. Is pr6ject substantially tontiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? I-lYes ~No : t. 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register 0f National Natural Landmarks? [:lYes [~No g. What is the depth of the water table? unlmm~ (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? l~Ye~, l-]No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? []Yes ONo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? E3Yes []No According to self ' Identify each species ~ " 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) []Yes ~No Describe' 13.'1s the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as -an open space or recreation area? I-lYes F'INo If yes, explain . unknown 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [Z]Yes []No unknown 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a, Name Barlow Pond b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing p, ublic utilities? ~Yes I-1No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~Yes ~No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ~Yes []No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? I-lYes {~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 [~Yes i-]No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? l-lYes I~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0.998 b. Project acreage to be developed: 0.096 acres initially; 0.096 c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0. 902 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A ~(If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing (b ;'proposed ~) g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 1 (upon completion of project)? h. If~residenfial: Number and type of housing units: acres. acres ultimately. One Family Two Family Multiple Family c~nd-om-inium ...... Initially one Ultimately one i. Dimensions {in feet) of largest proposed structure 35 height; ~ width; 67 , length. ' j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? q) ft. 3 2. How much natural material (i.e.. rock. earth, etc.) will be removed from the s~te? 3~ Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? F-lYes I-INo ~N/A tons/cubic yards a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? iZ]Ye~ E]No " c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I-lYes I-1No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, §round covers] will be removed from site? 0.C~c)F~ acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? I-lYes IXlNo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 3 7. If multi-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? l-Wes []No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 15 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project (~ 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? (number). months, (including demolition). month month I-lYes I-iNo year, (including demolition). year. ; after project is complete l-lYes J~No If yes, explain .12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? eYes IK1No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged $3. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~Yes t-INo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain sewage I-lYes J~No -'- 15. 16. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? F~Yes Will the project generate solid waste? - [~Yes [3No a. If yes, what is the amount per month 0.35 tons b. If yes, will an existing .solid waste facility be used? f~Yes I-INo c. If yes, Ewe name Fishers Island Landfill ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? I~No Fishers Island F-lYes ~No e. If Yes. explain 17: Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? I~Yes · a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? 0.35 b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? N/A years. 18. Will'project use herbicides or pesticides? I-lYes l~No I--1No tons,lmonth. 19. 20. 21 22. 24: Does project involve-Local, State or Federal funding? " If Yes, e×olain - Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? I-lYes IQNo Will project produce operating noise exceeding the 'local ambient noise levels? I-lYes Will project result in an increase in energy use? E~JYes l-lNo If yes indicate typeCs] Electrical and Home Heating Oil If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/mintJt~...?=.' Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. ~ .... l-lYes J~No "' t~No 4 ,25. Approvals Required: .City, Town, Village Board ~q~stees ~Yes E3No City, Town, Village Planning Board {:lYes I~No City, Town Zoning Board [:]Yes []No City, County Health Department [~Yes {No Other Local Agencies I:]Yes I~No Other R. egional Agencies [:]Yes ~No State Agencies []Yes [:]No Federal Agencies [Yes ~No Type C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action inVolve a pla"nning or zoning decision? I-lYes ~No , If Yes, indicate decision required: []zoning amendment ~zoning variance [special use permit ~]subdivision []site plan []new/revision of master plan []resource management plan I-lother 2. What is the zoning classificationCs)of the Site? R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the Site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? One single family dwelling 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A . Submillal Date 11/1/88 Single family residence 11/15/88 N~¥.S~D.E.C. Letter of 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoningZ 6. Is the'proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~Yes 7. What are the predominant land use{s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action? R-40 8.. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A [-'lNo · mile? IX]Yes C1No a..What is the minimum Jot size proposed? 10. WiJJ propgsed action require any authorization[s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? I-Wes E'iNo 11. Will thep~oposed action create a demand for any communiW provided services {recreation, education, police, fire pr6t'e~iOn)~ ~Yes ~No a. If Yes, is existin8 capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ~Yes ~No 12. Will thb:p~0~sed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~Yes ~No a. If' yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic~ ~Yes ~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss suc~ impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification Applicant/Sponsor Na~ Glenn E. Just for ~lnQa ~ooldridge ;~ ....... . Signature_ . ~~----~~ Date ~24/90 ,tie _ p~.~..T.~ultin~ If Ihe aclion is in the Coastal A~and you are a stale agency, complele the Coastal Assessment Form before pro~ with Ibis assessmenL " Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE -- Responsibility of Lead Agency ' General Information (Read Carefully), :, , · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations beeq, reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant..~ Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simpl~) = asks that it be looked at further. · · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3." · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question; · The number of examples oer question does not indicate the importance of each question. · in identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully)_ a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. · c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact tl'i*reshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. if reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART'3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1 '. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to thee project site? "~0. I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 :-· Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. --:?.~ · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 2, feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than' one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a desi§nated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on . the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.'J~O I-IYES · Spe.cific land forms: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By, Impact Impact Project Change [] .El F-lYes i-]No ' [] [] [-]Yes E]No [] [] i']Yes E]No: [] [] l-lYes r-lNo [] [] EE]Yes []No' [] [] E]Yes i-]No( [] [] i-lYes I'-INo [] ..~ ....... OYes. I-]No [] ~iE]!": 'E3Yes I:]No' 6 IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected.~ (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) E3NO F-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a 'protected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body· Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland· Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body ! of water? I-1NO I-1y ES ~xamples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · 'Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity.~ I-INO '~J~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ·Prop, osed ,Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 . gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. 0. Proposed Action will adverselv affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses w'hi~:h may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts:... · 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff~ i-lNO i-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows· 7 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large,. Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] [-]Yes I--INo [] [] I-'lYes ["-]No [] [] I-lYes l-IN· ~ [] []Yes I-"lNo [] [] l/Yes []No [] [] ~Yes l--IN· [] [] r-lyes I--IN· [] [] I--lYes l-IN· [] [] I-lYes l--IN· [] [] I-lYes r-IN· I [] [] []Yes i--IN· [] [] []Yes E~]No [] [] DYes [-]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [-]No [] [] [-]Yes l-]No ~J~ [-]Yes []No [] [] []Yes [-]No [] ~ [] ; []Yes,_ []No · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality.~ ~NO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · ,Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · . Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producir~ more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action Will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. ' · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas, · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Wilt Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ~O E3YES ,Examples that would apply to column 2 '. Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or.near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat, · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? r-JNO ,~ES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or m~gratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vege, tation. - - IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Wi'Ii the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? '~O r-lYES I 2 3 Small to Potential Ca'n Impact Be Moderate Large. Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I-lYes I-INo [] [] I-lYes I-]No [] [] []Yes I'-INo [] [] r-lyes r'lNo [] [] I-lYes l-INo [] [] I-IVes I-INo [] "[:3 [3Y~s rnNo [] [] '-]Yes I-1No [] [] r-lYes [] [] []Yes r-lNo [] [] E3Y~s r-lNo, [] [] I-lyes I-INo [] [] i-lYes E3No ~ [] E3Yes 1:3No [] [] r-lYes r-lNo [] ! [] ;i !:l~]Yes 'I-'INo Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural . land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, wneyard, Orchard, etc.) · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2..5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, ......... ~trip cropping);' or: create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? %~O E~YES (If necessary, use the Visual E^F Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that wo, uld apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enioyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · P~r~ject components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ,"~NO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ~::~O I-lYES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A'major reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: 9 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By- Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I-lYes J-'lNo [] [] F-lYes I-lNo' [] [] E]Yes F']No [] [] r'lYes I'-IN0 [] [] DYes I']No [] [] F'TYes I-IN0 [] [] E]Yes F1No [] [] I-lYes E]No [] [] E]Yes F-INo E] [] E]Yes E]No [] [] ' l-lYes E3No [] [] E]Yes I-1No [] .......... i r-lYes [] [] r-lyes I-1No IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14:--Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? '~O F1YES Examples that Would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: · IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? '~O I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a grea{er than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. ~ Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other. impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be obiectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? 'l~lO I-lYES Examples that would apply' to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? 'l~L.o OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) ·Stofage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed action may result in the excavation, or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Other impncts: 10 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By :, Impact Impact Project Change [] [] OYes J-]No' [] [] OYes r-]No" O [] []Yes []No. T 0 O OYes l-lNo O [] OYes []No' O O F1Yes F-INo' O O OYes •No [] O []Yes []No O [] []Yes I-'1 No [] O OYes []No [] [] OYes []No [] [] []Yes ON0 [] O []Yes O O []Yes ONo [] : O F]Yes I-'lNo .-~ IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18~.~Will proposed acti6n affect the character of the exist, i.n~ cornmunity? To E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · ' The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will.increase by more than 5% ~er year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities,' structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand.for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects· · ProPosed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts:.. I 2 3 Small to 'Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I-lYes I'-IN0 [] [] ~Yes i-]No [] [] I--lYes I--INO [] i-1' []Yes I--INo "[] [] I-lYes []No [] [] []Yes I-INo [] [] I-IYes I--IN0 [] [] []Yes t--INo [] .I--I []Yes I-I No. '19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? r-INO ~]~E5 . . If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even it: the impact(s) may be · mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact, 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or'reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(si. 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring : ' · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence.of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whetht:r known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Contigue on attachments) ,4 RECEIVED JAN :~ 8 1989 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DAVID HARRIS. M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER Southold Town Board 53095 Main Road Southold, N. Y. 11971 January 17, 1989 RE: Propose'd Single Family Dwelling Located Adjacent to Barlow Pond, Fishers Island, for Linda Wooldridge SCTM ~ 1000-007-03-003.15 Dear Town Board: Please be advised that this office..~is in receipt of an ap- plication for Approval to Construct a single family house to be served by public water and individual sanitary system for the above referenced site. The proposed development is adjacent to Barlow Pond, which is the water supply for Fisher Island Water Works. In confor- mance with the FIDCO Map, all development adjacent to the water supply pond are Type I actions under SEQR. Therefore, this of- fice respectfully requests that the Town of Southold conduct a coordinated review and assume lead agency status pursuant to Part 617 of the'implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law. A copy of the submission to this office is enclosed for your review. Please notify this office within 30 days of your agreement to this request. Very truly yours Waiter G. Lindley Sr. En~vir. Planner COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD. N.Y. 11901 FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN 5I. BREDE51EYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. S51ITH TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 Nov. 1, 1988 Mr. Glenn Just J.M.O. Consulting North Country Road- Box 361 Wading River, N.Y. 11792 Re: Woolridge Appl. No 652- water supply Dear Mr. Just: Thank you for enlightening us and sharing information with us. Please be advised that we will not have jurisdiction in this case. Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, President Board of Trustees FAK:jas TELEPHONE t516) 765-1801 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL To: From: Dated: Southold Town Trustees Southold Town CAC October 20, 1988 The following are recommendations made by the CAC at its meeting of Tuesday, October 18, 1988. RESOLVED to concur with any recommendation by Environmental Consultant Larry Penny regarding Wetland Application No. 652 of Linda Wooldridge to construct a single family dwelling, decking, sanitary system, gravel drive, pool and decking. Private Road, Fishers Island RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval with stipulation of Wetland Application No. 653 of Linne's Ostling to replace existing bulkhead approximately 12" - 18'~ in front of existing bulkhead Which would be in allignment with the existing bulkhead of the southerly neighbor. The CAC recommends applicant regrade slope of backyard or put in system of drywells to control runoff. Osprey Nest Road, Greenport. RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval with stipulations of Wetland Application No. 654 of Harold W. Conroy to construct new bulkhead within 18" of existing bulkhead. CAC recommends applicant to put in system of drywells to contain runoff before it reaches the bulkhead. Applicant should note that over fertilization of lawns contribute to the water pollution problems. Lighthouse Lane, Southold. RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval of Wetland Application No. 655 of Robert K. and Elizabeth A. Simon to build a 1½ story, single family dwelling consisting of 1000 square feet. The CAC recommends disapproval because the project would damage the environment; project is too close to the wetlands and the cesspools would drain downhill into the wetlands. ROW off Indian Neck Land/Wood Lane, Peconic. FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, .IR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 August 31, 1988 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Glenn Just J.MoO. Consulting North Country road Box 361 Wading River, New York 11792 Re: Wootdridge - 1000-007-3-3.15 Dear Mr° Just: Please be advised that the Trustees inspected the above referenced property on August 3, 1988 and it was determined that the work proposed is within our jurisdiction. Please advise this office as you acquire other permits as may be necessary for this project. Very truly yours, FAK:ip cc: Bldg. Dept.~ file Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees FRANK A. KUJA%VSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 1197t September 6, 1988 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Robert A. Greene Alternate Regional Permit Administrator New York State D.E.C. Bldg. 40, SUNY, Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Re: Application No. 652 - Linda F. Wooldridge - 1000-007-3-3.15 Dear Mr. Greene: Please be advised that this office has received a partial application in the above referenced matter. It is noted that this project is a Type I Action according to the S.C.D.H.S., as advised by the Building Department (see copy Of map attached). Pursuant to the Code of the Town of Southold, the Board of Town Trustees will not act upon an application until it is deemed complete by the submission of documentary proof that all other necessary permits and approVals have been received. Please keep this office informed of your progress in this matter. We wish to be involved in your environmental review under the S.E.Q.R.A. Legislation. Feel free to contact this office at (516) 765-1932 should you have any questions in regard to this matter. FAK:ip Attachment cc: ~~r~hn~k~Aery truly y?urs ,/~ , Boar of To~n Trustees J.M.O. Consultants, Inc. for Linda F. Wooldridge~ Army Corps of Engineers/ New York State Dept. of State> Bldg. Dept/ Conservation Advisory Council/ Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services Pres. FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, IR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN 1~I. BREDEI~IEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. S~IITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 September 6, 1988 Mr. Glenn Just J.M.O. Consulting North Country Road Box 361 Wading River, New York 11792 Re: Wooldridge- Appl. No. 652 Dear Mr. Just: Please be advised that according to our records, an application fee of $i50.00 has not been submitted to this office for the above referenced application. In addition to this a long assessment form will be needed also. We would appreciate your remittance at the earliest possible date. As always, thank you for your cooperation to this matter. Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr., Pres. Iiene Pfifferlinf~', 41~rk ~ Board of Town Trustees ip cc: file FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 September 6, 1988 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. John Holzapfel, Chairman Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: Wooldridge - 1000-007-3-3.15 - Application No. 652 Dear Mr. Holzapfel: Transmitted herewith is application No. 652 for a Wetland Permit submitted by J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of Linda F. Wooldridgeo Please prepare a written report of findings and recommendations with respect to this application. Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees FAK:ip Attachment FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 August 31, 1988 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Glenn Just J.M.O. Consulting North Country ~'oad Box 361 Wading River, New York 11792 Re: Wooldridge - 1000-007-3-3.15 Dear Mr. Just: Please be advised that the Trustees inspected the above referenced property on August 3, 1988 and it was determined that the work proposed is within our jurisdiction. Please advise this office as you acquire other permits as may be necessary for this project. rnk ery truly yours, . ,~a ', Jr. President Board of Tdwn Trustees FAK:ip cc: Bldg. Dept. file Larry Penny/John Aldred Consultants To Fisher's Island 1453 Noyac Road Sag Harbor, N.Y. 11963 August 21, 1988 Mr. Frank A~ Kujawski, Jr. President Board Of Town Trustees Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Att.n: Woodridge Application Fisher's Island (SCTM No.1000-7-3-3.15) Dear Mr. Kujawski The above-referenced parcel was inspected on July 18, 1988, with respect to environmental considerations. The property consists of a relatively uniform mix of wet(mesic) woods' vegetation. Indicators of wetter conditions such as~red maple, shad, arrowwood and high bush blueberry with more upland indicators such as oaks, black cherry and northern bayberry. At the rear or northeastern boundary of the property a steep bluff leading to Barlow Pond, a Fisher's Island drinking water reservoir~ begins its descent. Wetland vegetation in the form of tupelo (pepperidge) trees, swamp azalea and sweetpepper bush range from the edge of the pond up the bluff to its crest. The most landward extent of this wetland vegetation has been flagged with pink ribbon and generally travels along the northeasterly property line. Conditions such as these, with wetland indicator species ranging into the uplands on the border of a deep freshwater glacial pond call attention to shallow and significant subsurface water flowmoving towards the body of water~ Consequently, in-ground structures such as basen~ents, pools and septic systems should be reviewed in light of this phenomenon, as well as the extent of clearing and use of chemicals such as fertilizers and pestieides~ The use of the pond as a source of drinking water for Fisher's Island makes a thorough understanding of potential impacts all the more imperative. To this end we recommend a series of test(observation)' wells be placed on the parcel to determine subsurface soil and flow conditions.(The consultants have been asking for such observation wells in parts of East Hampton where the potential impacts from groundwater flow to adjacent surface waters are great in order to better estimate these impacts and mitigate them.) Additionally, the wetland line as flagged should be indicated on a survey to accurately locate it with respect to the proposed construction and associated clearing. It would appear that the proposed impacts from this project on the pond system could be significant and the Board may want to entertai~ a positive declaration regards SEQRA. Woodridge Apolication/Aldred'Penny/2 ~ , Further recommendations will be forthcoming once the questions outlined above have been addressed. JA:lp Sincerely, ~ ~ Joh d FRANK A. KUJA~VSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 July 12, 1988 TELEPH ONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Larry. Penny 1453 Noyac Road Sag Harbor, New York 11963 Dear Mr. Penny: Transmitted herewith for your inspection and recommendation regarding Trustees jurisdiction are the following applications: J.M.O. Consulting for Patricia Pierce - 1000-3-5-5.2 J.M.O. Consulting for Linda F. Wooldridge - 1000-007-3-3.15 Please submit your comments at the earliest possible date. Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact this office at the telephone number listed above. Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. '~ President Board of Town Trustees FAK:ip Attachments CC: Judge Raymond Edwards, F.I. Trustees J.M.O. Consulting file N. COUNTRY RD. o BOX 361 WADING RIVER, N.Y. 11792 (516) 929-3575 July 5, 1988 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Mr. Frank Kujawski Re: Request for Determination of Jurisdiction Wooldridge - Fishers Island S.C.T.M. No. 1000-007-3-3.15 Dear Mr. Kujawski: At this point in time, I am requesting a "Determination of Jurisdiction" for the above noted site. I have enclosed a completed application form and short environmental assessment form to aid your Board in making this determination. As always, should you or any other member of the Board of Trustees or C.A.C. kave any comments or questions with regards to this matter, kindly contact this office at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your continued cooperation. Very truly yours, GlO'fin E. JuSt~' GEJ/te Enc. BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE LAWS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 32 OF THE CODES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. APPLICATION NO. .--_ DATE OF APPLICATION IDENTITY OF APPLICANT Linda F. Wooldridge July 5, 1988 (212)-486-10022 PHONE NO ADDRESS OF--APPLICANT 437 Madison Avenue New York, N.Y. 10022 TAX MAP NO. 1000-007-3--3.15 AGENT Glenn E. Just/J.M.0. Consultin% (516)-929-3575 PHONE NO. PERMIT REQUESTED TO construct a sinqle fami~ dwe!linqx_Jeckinq~ sanitar} system., gravel drive, pool and decking. Kindly note that all constructior shall take place 103' from the freshwater wetlands line, with the sanitary system being located 170' from said line. (See attached) LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR WHICHPERMIT WANTED Private Road, Fishers' Island ~ enc-losed). HOME ADDRESS OF PERMIT APPLICANT IF DIFFERENT FROM AFORESAID LOCATION CREEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY Barlow Pond SIZE OF PROPOSED WORK · Ap. prox. 4,058 s.f. of building, pool and decking LENGTH WIDTH HE{GHT ABOVE HIGH WATER DEPTH BELOW LOW WATER YARDS TO BE EXCAVATED YARDS TO BE FILLED 0 0 0 WIDTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY DEPTH AT LOW. TIDE 0 n/a AVERAGE RISE IN TIDE 0 DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL 0 FT. DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN THE AREA IS THIS FOR PRIVATE OR BUSINESS USE? -'-Private AREA ZONING Residential 0 FT. MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED INTENDED USE OF pROPERTY Privabe residence DESCRIBE ANY KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISE None to my knowledge . .... AND WHETHER ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMITS HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO ERRECT STRUCTURES OR TO DREDGE OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES AND WHETHER ANY PERMITS OR LICENSES WERE EVER SUSPENDED OR REVOKED BY A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY NgRe-she~-De-Reeessa~y- None to my knowledge DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION AND PROPOSED CONDITION OF THE PREMISES AFTER THE WORK IS COMPLETED INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF THE PROJECT SITE IF NECESSARY None should be necessary WRITTEN CONSENT OF ~HE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, IF NOT THE SAME AS THE APPLICANT.__~_JiLC~LO~S~i_~' ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED THAT WOULD PROHIBITUTHIS PROJECT? No The applicant is not proposing to bring and fill in nor to remove any existing vegetation located between the proposed construction and the wetlands line. The applicant shall also install staked hay bales and snow fencing prior to and during construction. Therefore, a "Letter of Permission" or "Letter of Non-Jurisdiction" is requested. 14-16-4 (2/87)--Text 12 PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C . State.Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) SEQR 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR Glenn Eo Just for 2, PROJECT NAME Linda F. Wooldridqe Private Res~den~.~. 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality Fishers Island County Suffolk 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) Private Road, Fishers Island Map Enclosed S.C.T.M. No. 5. IS PRO~ED ACTION: Lb& New [] Expans on [] Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY:A "Letter of Permission" of a "Letter of Non'Jurisdiction is requested to allow the applicant to construct a single family dwelling, decking sanitary system, gravel drive, pool and decking. Kindly note that all construction shall take' place 103' from the freshwater wetlands line, with the sanitary system located 170' from 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: ~t%a( Initially 0 . 0~3 acres Ultimately 0 . 093 acres 8. WILL P~,J;I~POSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? [~es [] No If No, describe briefly 9. WHr~A~PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? I_M'Residential [] Industrial [] Commercial Describe: [] Agriculture [] Park/Forest/Open space [] Other 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY, STATE O.~LOCAL)? ~es [] No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals Southold Town Trustees - "Letter of Non-Jurisdiction" S.C.D.H.S. FEDERAL, 11. DOES ANY AAP~T~,OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes I~v~l~lo If yes, list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULTOF P~I~OSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? [] Yes L~ No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS !RUE TO THE BEST.OF MY KNOWLEDGE IGlenn/~ Just/ for Linda F Wooldridge Applicant/sponsor name: , ' Date:~,~/~/ 7 --' h ~ If the action is in the Coastal A~ea, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 nor to remove ~nY existing vegetation located' between the proposed construction and the wetlands line. The applicant shall also install staked hay bales and snow fencing prior to and during construction~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK )SS.' AND SAYS THAT HE lB THE APPLICANT FOR THE.ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS, AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THAT THE WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF ..SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGNEES TO HOLD'THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GRANTED. In completing this application I hereby authorize the Trustees~ agen~ or representative to enter onto A~ property to inspect the premises in conjunction with review o~/t~his ~Dpl~cati~n. , " . s, OF I NT BEING'DULY SWORN DEPOSES NOTAI:~Y PUBL I C CHARLES W. BOWMAN ~.OTAR¥ PUBLIC, $1ale ol 14ew York No. 4668958, SuUolk Counly C°mmis*ion Expires, , ,88 EXAMINED APPROVED "WETLANDS" PERMIT (CHAPTER 97) APPROVED "BOAT,DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) DISAPPROVED "WETLANDS PERMIT" (CHAPTER 97) DISAPPROVED "BOATS,DOCKS, WHARVES" PE~MIT (CHAPTER 32) . CONDITIONS, IF ANY EXAMINING BODY SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 To. Ail Regulatory Agencies: .Date: Please be advised that Glenn E. Just/J.M.O. Consulting has my'permission to apply for all permits necessary to complete this project. Linda F. Wooldridge Enclosures .._..g.N~.W_~._Cg.ON..pO_q~Nco. .'~'~'"'~'" "~UFF~ CO.' ..... ~ NORTH DUMPLING cC~) SOUTH DUMPLING FLAT HUMMOCK FISHERS mpany, Inc., J NOTE- COORDINATE DISTANCES ARE MEASURED FROM COASTAND GEODETIC SUR~IEY TRIANGULATION STATION "NIN" W I015. 3~ K6Y MAP $oole~ I 168 ! BLOCK $$ LOT 6 A~EA = 0. 998-' Acres PO I0 0 NOTES, I BASE FOR LEVELS NGVD 19P9 -- 20 --'Ex~ting Contours ~, x~ ~ Ex*~ting spot elov. 4. ~PO~ P~po~d Con,rs ~ x~P~s~ Invert ole~ G. Suffolk Coun~ To* R~ Mop ~7 Bilk 3 7 OWNE~, LINDA E WOOLDRIDGE ~7 MADIS~ AVENUE NEW YORK, ~ Y / 0022 I AM FAMIUAR WITH ?H~ PTAN~RD8 PCB A~VAL AND ~ PUBSURFA¢~ S~WA~ ~SP~AL 9YP~MP ~R SIN~ PAMI~YR~SID~8 AND WIL~ ~1~ BY ?H6 CONDITIONS ~ FOBTH TH6B~ON AND ON APPLICAN? SITE PLAN - PROPOSED RESIDENOE PREPARED FOR L INDA B£OQK $$ LOT $ 40 SPA£E .TN FEET F. WOOLDRIDGE 6O FISHERS ISLAND~ NEW YORK SCALE I inch = £0 foot CHANOLE~ P~LI~ER ~ KING NORbCIOH~ OONNEOTICUT dUNE 17~ t98B