Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutERSAP EXISTING RESOURCES AND SITE ANALYSIS PLAN (ERSAP) NOTES: 10. THERE ARE NO CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS ON OR CONTIGUOUS TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS (CONTINUED): 1. THE BACKGROUND IMAGE FOR THE AREA SURROUNDING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WAS DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION EAF 1. SCTM:1000-083-02-013.8,OWNERS:DAVID&STEVEN ZUHOSKI(AGRICULTURAL) architects FROM THE SUFFOLK COUNTY GIS VIEWER. MAPPING TOOL. 2. SCTM:1000-083-02-014,OWNERS:DAVID,JOHN,MICHAEL,SHARON&STEVEN ZUHOSKI,ANNE LASOTA,LAURIE STEINER,&LISA EASTWOOD(AGRICULTURAL) 2. THERE ARE NO EXISTING STRUCTURES LOCATED ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, 11. CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE NEW YORK NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM(DATED OCTOBER 27,2021) 3. SCTM:1000-083-03-015.2,OWNERS:WJF FARMS LLC +INDICATED THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OCCURS WITHIN 1.25 MILES OF KNOWN, NON-WINTER 4. SCTM:1000-083-03-04.11,OWNERS:F&S LLC 3. THERE ARE NO WETLANDS ON,OR WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ACCORDING TO THE LOCATIONS FOR NORTHERN LONG-EARED BAT(MYOTIS SEPTENTRIONALIS). IN ADDITION,REVIEW OF 5. SCTM:1000-083-03-04.12,OWNERS:F&S LLC NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION,ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE THE NYS ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MAPPER, NY NATURE EXPLORER,AND USFWS IPAC DATABASE 6. SCTM:1000-084-03-02.0,OWNERS:GLENN F,GLENN F JR.,&JEFFREY W HEIDTMANN engineers MAPPER. INDICATES THAT SEVERAL THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES HAVE POTENTIAL TO OCCUR AT 4. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE NASSAU-SUFFOLK SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 5. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THE SURROUNDING 500 FOOT AREA FALLS WITHIN ZONE X(AREAS OF ALTHOUGH THE RESOURCES CONSULTED INDICATE POTENTIAL PRESENCE OF THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES,ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS MAY,OR MAY NOT,PROVIDE SUITABLE HABITAT MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD) INDICATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL N0. FOR MANY OF THESE SPECIES.IN ORDER TO CONFIRM ACTUAL OR PROBABLE OCCURRENCE OF 36103C0142H AND 36103C0144H DATED 9/2255 12009. THESE SPECIES, LAND USE ECOLOGICAL SERVICES INC.(LUES)CONDUCTED A FIELD INVESTIGATION AND IN-DEPTH ENDANGERED SPECIES ANALYSIS ON JUNE 1,2021.A COPY OF THE LUES REPORT IS 638 Broad Hollow Road,4th Floor East 6. ACCORDING TO THE PROTECTED LANDS WITHIN THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAPPER,THE SUBJECT Melville, NY 11747 PROPERTY AND ALL ABUT7ING PROPERTIES ARE NOT WITHIN AN AREA LEGALLY PROTECTED BY THE INCLUDED IN THE EXPANDED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SUBMITTED WITH THIS ERSAP. 631.756.8000•www.h2m.com COUNTY OF SUFFOLK,THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,PRIVATE TRUSTS,QUALIFIED CONSERVATION 12. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING: ORGANIZATIONS OR OTHER ENTITIES OR AGENCIES. • THE BOUNDARY OF ANY CITY,VILLAGE OR TOWN; 7. A SOILS SURVEY AND REPORT FROM THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, NATURAL CONSULTANTS: RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE FOR SUFFOLK COUNTY ACCOMPANIES THIS ERSAP. • THE BOUNDARY OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED COUNTY OR STATE PARK OR OTHER 8, ACCORDING TO THE NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF PARKS,RECREATION AND HISTORIC RECREATION AREA; PRESERVATION'S CULTURAL RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEM (CRIS)MAPPER,THE SUBJECT • THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED COUNTY OR STATE PARKWAY,THRUWAY, PROPERTY AND AND ABUTTING TRACTS ARE NOT LOCATED WITHIN AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SENSITIVE EXPRESSWAY,ROAD OR HIGHWAY; AREA, NOR ARE THERE HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT SITES OR STRUCTURES LISTED ON THE • THE EXISTING OR PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ANY STREAM OR DRAINAGE CHANNEL OWNED BY NATIONAL OR STATE REGISTER. THE COUNTY OR FOR WHICH THE COUNTY HAS ESTABLISHED CHANNEL LINES; 9. PORTIONS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE CURRENTLY CULTIVATED FOR SOD FARMING.THE . THE EXISTING OR PROPOSED BOUNDARY OF ANY COUNTY OR STATE OWNED LAND ON WHICH A SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREAS ARE LOCATED WITHIN A DESIGNATED PUBLIC BUILDING OR INSTITUTION IS SITUATED;OR AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AS INDICATED ON THE SUFFOLK COUNTY GIS MAP ACCOMPANYING THIS MARK DATE DESCRIPTION ERSAP. • AN EXISTING AIRPORT,AIRBASE OR AIRSTRIP. O WOODLANDS S I 6 L ._.-_ _1111.-- x � x x �. x x. 5xx '4r x TM 4 a SCTM:1000.083.03-04.7 OWNER:NORTH FORK xx RECYCLING INC SCTM:1000.096-01.017.5 a. OWNER:TOWN OF SOUTHOLD mom. WOODLANDS SCTM:1000.083-03-04.5 �s WOODLANDS OWNER:DONALD J GRIM 8 : SCTM:J000-033-02-013.6 # " ZUHOSKI JEANNE M GRACE �+ E., OWNER:DAVID&STEVEN ZUH + + } }n.� ; .E . .v (AGRICULTURAL) + + + + } + + +^. �-,-r-- + ® + + + } + # # F--+,+.+# + + + + + + }- + + + + i• T + + + 4 + }U +ll1 FFe4M++ } +++++++++++ + + + ++++++ + + # +++++++++*++++ + s d`N0W�5ma�E�'11i ,. ..s.:. • . S o/ckp�le-l-.l�s-M'{n„Po�'^76q✓P I_ I Mtia+s�on-ry-+B+am-4"�+ ++T_#I`++.,d�``/hfrr.+}�U.•-"6\,+�+t66{8'\6.ry61 t'f.1♦.8',3�t�7II..V.Iy'I IB.IIY I�-*11\;W*'�*WI1*\�W''"W 1f*-W r6*W-,*.1<y.*1**66 tW*.*,1-KW:M,W\*Y7•W W*W`*�W\W'6*66*fi*y5;114'`W.*Y 3W*Wy W W W/1*W W"B*W'1W,Q*W-W*W*�I WWW*W W-V•W NW W*-W*6*W W W W WW'�W7 W Wty._.W W^Wb.W 6 W eW Wfi3yWWms_.W-.AW7 W2W"��*W�*'W 1fiW`W+WW4#•WW6 W,W6 W.y W`W*/W*lW y yW WW*W r-YW W W1*'y,y.�r'W WLWFW-W&.We�*.]W+W W-W+-w W»W y W 0t*7.W iW_/6.W•W8xo 3W*y r.W 2*SWW ywi-t�*6.W*6JW W}�6�W*W.W 5W-W.*-*W.W W W_-Wr6W�3 W WW„;WW W4�W•.•V6W W W W1r66W'y 3y 4.WrW 6*..y+1W6 51**./*,Wy.W!W'6*/"••/.W W W 6W W:.W�::1WW 1*.W yW.r W6W.y*+WW yW¢.W•W*Wu W rW WsMW'y*^/W W reW'W*"yW�'.WW qW W e,.W�.W y*`W�WW Wr+W W W WW*WW W.1 W/,�y W•W W✓*W*W W-maWW W.*aW W'y.W W�fW*W yW•J W WW i W/*'VW/_W WW,W•.W*WS1*WW W'*W S W W W)TW W W*W-W*W.W-W'W 1W-+W�W y y,W(W`�W^i.W WI•y W W ysWW WyW4W W W 9W'*'�y�W/WW.*•W WW W W W 5W W y*-6�WwYW.W�fW'W0//�W*W'W„W„�y W W*.W 1W WW*tWWW+-!gy.;W W W*W-W,HW`*1y W y W./W,W WW W*WT yW W y*W W�"W-W T*W*-*�y W WW y'W,�W*�WW y*/W WWWWy1*W�W-W y\�W**lW W*'rW�W.*W+�W*y�.y WW*CW.WW W,1�W'***W W''W*iVy WW*xWo(`"W*.''�W W**yW 7y W*ZI'*Y W*y'/•W*y* *W,W*W*W1W*MW-,�WW✓+=WW S{}W,W*W^s'W*6*,WW W'W*/,W*sWW. *J-,hW W*W?*�WW W_✓`.WW W-yW'y W�W;y**J•.y1W_WJ WWW,-**-W Wa y'*W-W'*WW�/W 6W aiW W�,.'W8*1•'»yfi16Wp,*.1 W.*Wb*._'W.WrY°+W.y/,,+*W'W W`W'�*.WW WYW W*W W*4/.W.W\X..W WW**`**yW W�WW W W-6GW W*6*\W�W.W_6vW�,/�•Y�WW'W*!*'.y WW/W yW w.y Wµ3WW.*W q�W*y*W_**W WW WW�1ayWWW WW W 1 W*.W.•4,�W W./6W W,,*.yW!4L W Wf Wr_W W-1 y aW�W*W-W,�-Wyyy yW�W*W-AW W W BW VW*..y-.'WyY�WWyW•W,y�W.WW W W.W WW*_*WW*W yW_�WW W W y W�WdW.y yVW y iy VW'yW WW W"y W/"*WW W'yWW WW WWy�W.`W W��W'W WW W/maWWW/*W*�yW W y_.W Wx*'W V1,(y*7y�W_.yW WB_*._,W'-�*W"`$W W 5�W-*q Q 3.-W 7Vey 6W�Y.6*8/.✓W W,68W..W 1*11W*1�JW W•W*0WW.*,yY*+W W W66Ww.WB1�W WW*/W w,.`W5WV1.1/*`*✓Y W\W/W\'W**W/y W W WWyW y/yW�1�W,W W,*+**W**./W"*'W/W,W-'W*xW i�_W/�Wy**i6YYYyW Wt�.W W VyYW*ry W.'t/'/Wi•W1"WW*W�jeif"-W W W�'t`y**•"W W G•.W"B�.'*W�W W�W"WW�*fi-'WW�.yW PW yW W^Y/�y W/W.y 6�y•W1**f6W� y W.�Nfi3{W*W*6W BW,.W sW3 W*W WcWW ey WW W W WlWlW1aW W�1Wy W5nW�6W WeWW 1YW�..o*1_WW uWWW W*sW/**W'WW W*8pW/W 6W�W m4yy�W V1 1 W rW/*pW W•4*W W W�W W yeyy W�Wr/+yWaWy'y ta,*r�W•eW WWrW a5WW�a*W 1sy_W W6W.'6Y 6yW;W.'y;W�*W•a:WWF.W W.y�.'d..t y W-*.W V*_WWAW y WWjImeW f,BWW y,Ww� W WylyqaW WnFWyl W+VW'.W✓,�+W W W WWW y;W W**W-W RW*\W#ti*W+y W WW,++W•}.�VW W*�W•,W++++"-�+W++W 0WWWW WW.}W+ imW WyW WW�W+ i } + +W` W 1W,-+}W.1•1•,1 1 i*+'�W W*WWW*Wyy+D*y,WWyWWW1.}W(•-W+6_W W qWW�*!Wy W/*•..6/,+•i�W�+yW• + Sb*�rWb�.W✓6�p*•+ J•+W*.W+ + +S W+y WI�•1'W*1+Q,1'l6+#1. X+W WW+*+W W y/W W.*W+•WV ++ }B,Y,4W J♦+W.-p-+WSW+ *+V"+ +`+ +y. }tWn W*+•y�-•W CWF/W W/�.W +r.WWt-yiy W +W W#W 7 nW 1Wo*t"�\0/�W,• VYTWWfioi+ Wy'r yW��1W W•F1*r_W�/1y*y**�*,i'r+'WX+++rtW ,W++�WW*WW''W:*j*�•/ + '+ 1W*+}#++#++ + + ++ + + + + #+#}#+++ # + + + ++++++.+++++++ + + + + + + + } + + + + + + + + + + + + + # + ++}i++}++}+++#++ + + + }}+}++ 4 + } + + # } + + + } + + EXISTING STRUCTURE ON +*+* + * + * * # ` # ++ + + + + +++++f4++#i++4+++++++++++-++:+:+:+:++++++++++ 4 ++++++++++ +}}+ + } + * + + } +++ + + + +++}++++i*+}}++++ +++++++#}+ } } }++ .6 ADJACENT PROPERTY(TYP.) } } } } + } + + + , + + +++} + + + + + + , } + + + + + +++++ + + + + + + + + +++}+++++}++}+++ + + + + + + + #w ++++}}+++# # * i + * * * + + + ++ IW}'W'WW rWW ry WGWWWt-WWvW W+W I� _*WW�*1y,O W_yy*+*OO.�W W.10WT W y 1`1.W`1.7 9{L fi''Wy W�y*''.•W*WW'+W-WWJ"�K"V.'j°,y,W.W6*WW.�W*WWgAW W*c�*qq J.�7Y~VW*WW W y Wy0`W�-W./y ry.�..�.''Wy4'_.IIT WMrW/W*6YW�W,'W�W�'°:-'s`5 W J�W*;/WwWWWlWLW6'A*yI•3��/.�W�4 yVIWYW'*•W��W'r.(/W W I*YrP;tW\D*'WyJ�W•rW W 66W�W J'W/VQg'y1+•/a 3*.y Wy..fW0�WO't}I6�{W/WD*FYo0WCWttV*jJW J1 I*W W W OQIW"+*y yWS1,WW OWIL.I1II6W.�WRY�(WW.�W 1*�W•\.I\•`y iW�,IW II6.IW��.*WeWW,0,*W~o W.j-Wy..r Y W-fy��W$W W y`r,.WW(Am\tVyI.-W.YW6..•*'1yYy3dl Wp W10\.*j7���WraW.-.W p/WW W.�o---� yyyy0.•Wff JW W�V).yMWY y+MWW.,'�1��^f,y WYdJI^^y(IWII I yW(I.,y;W��'JW1N'W ksy'yW/W W q1W�\J'r,y.�.y'W.r.".�✓4y.04�.0M�'+�jW'•��WW.1y+ojf`Wry~y ratJWC '�-I.`������'j(`'1%/ayw("x*�r�.`W+4IIVk2e'*Y'`NW"!+�yIt."'i��'[%`.'`►�J`,W .IW^lfyI.W*I�I*,��.y^4<i�111II I I.��F•CC�C1I I""I�•Y+Vy!;W�.*W`**'p1.r,•"'+/`Y.`^� y ',WI�v'yrW*W W*.W•�*,eI/(1 im-Wy�IyWIIWIWI�yW)*I�)WJ 1yI+ y WW W�r W'�y*'W WYWW%W\Oy,y�WA�,W AWW tW*�W�V'•+t�SS.W1*y0I`WIW`/..k1�WtlWY..y�6*I�^WPyNy IIV�1yrWW�✓l V ayy*W,/1WW y !WW*1W WW/l(Wyr(y Sy y �W I y* WW YWWyqJW y. IIIBIi0!Yt�1tf�x ? I II �I I III'I•��I'�,.�l�//�A:rY/�?;� P2A'%r '[. .Jg'rrvk'}ht�.. „ Y� fi l+ , ,yt A, S \ I t"f# 'r..4... .�' II x --' ... ... w e "NLTMTgN OF THIS DOCUMNTEXCEPT BY lLpEf![ PROFESSIONAL 1L q LL ° F OA L ' + + + + + + + + + + + + + +#+ ++++++++++++++++ + + DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: REV I EWED BY: ++ +++*#+}+++++++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + } RJR JMT RJR AAWL AO+ + + + + i ++ PROJECT No.: DATE: SCALE: + f ♦ + + + + + + + KCEG 2101 JUNE 6, 2022 AS SHOWN+ + + + + + + + CLIENT SCTM:1000.083-03.05.3 + OWNER:11goo OREGON ROAD LLC + moil KCE NY 26, LLC + # # •611 ,j avehePMEwbmntskrBeAe 4 m "uSCTm016.1 rwrosv - A D10 x15 .2.1IN AEL MCBR1 E JAMES MICHOWNERf RICHARD JAMES MCBRIDE *.51., (AGRa W **.6+++ �6 61.3 1 W Wy y+++ * -54. + NarNY +++ 66 S + 66y y - W * * W ` � y / ' * 1WSCTM:1000.083-02.15 +++ 6] W6W � * 459 KCE NY 26 OWNER:FRANK1CBRIDE 6 / } + WSY 'l, •31] y -518 -58.7AND SON INC WLTURAL) W 0S 56 �.1 4� 6558 nB(AGRICU611 9 F.lL � yyy W W 633W 36 66 61 S "4u� WW f•WW Sft *0.fiM -\ J •64.1W •61* W * 513* W W W * _r/ W * / . WEE �.3 /' yW W *661 y • * * * * * * + W y * W_ i* - WW W `W` _� " * * * * 7 � * * * * Y 63/ ir- i� y 604* NDIW W/ * W W Eli* 6/.8 -636y ®y4.1py * * JW Y/W WW W W W y * * * * 4,554 y * W W * W / I * * *- W -6wy * * WWWy* * 1/W07F.M W_* * WW * * W W*65.1 W * .6441 6 •$ad fig./ •fid. KEY CAPTURE 1573 W * W 1 * * * 03 afii� *0.1 LW * W W W . O ENERGY .62 .V,4 V53+ W * W W ✓W * * * W Y * W 51.N Y %64.4 V' 05.9 W6 0 dA 15 +� 6.1 j .3 -54.1 Sa Woodd ee _- -- - TEEM., 63.d •63J •63.3 61.4 61 77 61.4 64.9 .54.7 •64.5 qSUBJECT PROPERTY I. WOODLANDS SCTM:1000-095.02.01.1 SCTM:1000.096-01-02.0 OWNER:JPK SMM ACRES LLC OWNER:SOUTHOLD SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 10750 Oregon Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 zCONTRACT x SCTM:1000.095.03-06.0 x X ALL CONTRACTS OWNER:NORTH FORK SCTM: 000.095-02-07.0 RECYCLING PROPERTY LLC OWNER:NORTH FORK RECYCLING PROPERTY LLC STATUS REGULATORY REVIEW SHEET TITLE GRAPHIC SCALE 100 0 50 100 EXISTING RESOURCES AND SITE E ANALYSIS PLANRECEIVED (IN FEET) 1 inch= 100 ft. t JUN 10 2022 - Planning Board NO. SOUL O Own DRAWING ERSAP C) USDA United States A product of the National Custom Soil Resource Department of Cooperative Soil Survey, Agriculture a joint effort of the United Report for n I RCS States Department of I\v� Agriculture and other Suffolk County,Federal agencies, State Natural agencies including the Resources Agricultural Experiment New York Conservation Stations, and local Service participants KCEG 2101 RECEIVED JUN 10 2022 --So—u-t-ffiold Town Planning Board ■ M : .W4 µ1Y h f 0 700 ft February 2, 2022 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning; onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain.conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https:Hoffices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist(http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nres142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for.buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,. sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at(202) 720-2600•(voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or(202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Contents Preface....................................................................................................................2 How Soil Surveys Are Made...............................................................................:..5 SoilMap.................................................................................................................. 8 SoilMap................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 MapUnit Legend......................................................................1......................... 11 MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Suffolk County, New York................................................................................13 HaA—Haven loam, O.to 2 percent slopes................................................... 13 HaB—Haven loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes................................................... 14 Ma—Made land...........................................................................................15 PIA—Plymouth loamy coarse sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes..........................16 PIC—Plymouth loamy coarse sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes....................... 18 RdA—Riverhead sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes...................................20 RdB—Riverhead sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes...................................21 RdC—Riverhead sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes................................ 22 References............................................................................................................25 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource. areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus,-during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 Custom.Soil Resource Report scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests..Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and 6 Custom Soil Resource Report identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. 7 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 3 709290 719350 709440 709530 709M 709710 709900 709890 709950 710070 0 41°2 1"N Ste.-, - 41°2 t+ Ilk f �X. i- � a _ � � � { ger,.► � �:�T ,� f art ddd � q r s n•.t be valid at Oman al 41°1'43'N .. 1 70MBO 709350 709440 7R9597 709620 709710 709900 709890 709990 1�r0 3 Map Scale:1:3,910 if printed on A landscape(11"x 8.5')sheet N Meters n 0 50 100 200 300 Feet ,\ 0 150 300 600 600 Map projection:Web Mercator Corner coordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zone 18N WGS84 9 Custom Soil Resource Report MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest(AOI) Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at Area of Interest(AOI) 1:20,000. ® Stony Spot Soils Very Stony Spot U Soil Map Unit Polygons Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Wet Spot r.� Soil Map Unit Lines Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause Other misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil ® Soil Map Unit Points 9 PP 9 Y .� Special Line Features line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of Special Point Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed U Blowout Water Features scale. Streams and Canals Borrow Pit Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map Clay Spot Rails measurements. i-�-► 0 Closed Depression Interstate Highways Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Gravel Pit cra US Routes Web Soil Survey URL: Gravelly Spot Major Roads Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857) Landfill Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator A. Lava Flow Background projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the Marsh or swamp . Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more Mine or Quarry accurate calculations of distance or area are required. 0 Miscellaneous Water This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as 0 Perennial water of the version date(s)listed below. V Rock Outcrop Soil Survey Area: Suffolk County, New York + Saline Spot Survey Area Data: Version 19, Sep 1,2021 e Sandy Spot Soil map units are labeled (as space allows)for map scales .gj. Severely Eroded Spot 1:50,000 or larger. 0 Sinkhole Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Jul 29,2020—Aug �y Slide or Slip 21,2020 oa Sodic Spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. 10 Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol • Map Unit Name Acres in AOl Percent 6fA01 HaA Haven loam,0 to 2 percent 15.3 56.5% slopes HaB Haven loam,2 to 6 percent 4.6 17.0% slopes Ma Made land 0.1 0.4% PIA Plymouth loamy coarse sand,0 3.0 11.2% to 3 percent slopes PIC Plymouth loamy coarse sand,8 3.3 12.0% to 15 percent slopes RdA Riverhead sandy loam,0 to 3 0.0 0.0% percent slopes RdB Riverhead sandy loam,3 to 8 0.6 2.3% percent slopes RdC Riverhead sandy loam,8 to 15 0.2 0.6% percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 27.2 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a 11 Custom Soil Resource Report given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity; degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. 12 Custom Soil Resource Report Suffolk County, New York HaA—Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 9x6v Elevation: 0 to 310 feet Mean annual precipitation: 45 to 50 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 54 degrees F Frost-free period: 150 to 225 days Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Haven and similar soils: 75 percent Minor components:25 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Haven Setting Landform: Outwash plains Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex Parent material: Loamy glaciofluvial deposits over sandy and gravelly glaciofluvial deposits Typical profile Oa-0 to 2 inches: highly decomposed plant material H1 -2 to 5 inches: loam H2-5 to 19 inches: loam BC- 19 to 28 inches: gravelly loam C-28 to 60 inches: stratified gravelly sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.20 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.3 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1 Hydrologic.Soil Group: B Ecological site: F149BY006NY-Well Drained Outwash Hydric soil rating: No 13 Custom Soil Resource Report Minor Components Scio Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Montauk Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Unnamed soils, gravelly Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Riverhead Percent of map unit. 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Bridgehampton Percent of map unit. 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No HaB—Haven loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 9x6w Elevation: 0 to 330 feet Mean annual precipitation: 45 to 50 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 54 degrees F Frost-free period. 150 to 225 days Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Haven and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Haven Setting Landform: Outwash plains Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex Parent material: Loamy glaciofluvial deposits over sandy and gravelly glaciofluvial deposits Typical profile Oa- 0 to 2 inches: highly decomposed plant material H9 -2 to 5 inches: loam 14 Custom Soil Resource Report H2- 5 to 19 inches: loam BC- 19 to 28 inches: gravelly loam C-28 to 60 inches: stratified gravelly sand Properties and qualities Slope:2 to 6 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.20 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low(about 4.3 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: F149BY006NY-Well Drained Outwash Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Riverhead Percent of map unit. 8 percent Hydric soil rating: No Montauk Percent of map unit. 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Bridgehampton Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Haven,thick surface Percent of map unit. 2 percent Hydric soil rating: No Ma—Made land Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 9x6z Elevation: 100 to 1,600 feet Mean annual precipitation: 45 to 50 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 54 degrees F Frost-free period. 150 to 225 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Made land: 100 percent 15 Custom Soil Resource Report Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Made Land Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7s Hydric soil rating: No PIA—Plymouth loamy coarse sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2zgh0 Elevation: 0 to 260 feet Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 52 inches Mean annual air temperature: 52 to 59 degrees F Frost-free period: 190 to 250 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Plymouth, loamy coarse sand, and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Plymouth, Loamy Coarse Sand Setting Landform: Outwash plains, hills, moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder, backslope, footslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, head slope, side slope, tread Down-slope shape: Linear, concave, convex Across-slope shape: Linear, concave, convex Parent material. Siliceous sandy and gravelly glaciofluvial deposits and/or sandy and gravelly supraglacial meltout till Typical profile Oi-0 to 1 inches: slightly decomposed plant material Oe- 1 to 2 inches: moderately decomposed plant material A -2 to 3 inches: loamy coarse sand E-3 to 5 inches: coarse sand Bhs-5 to 7 inches: cobbly loamy coarse sand Bw1 - 7 to 11 inches: cobbly loamy coarse sand Bw2- 11 to 22 inches: gravelly coarse sand BC-22 to 31 inches: gravelly coarse sand C1 -31 to 43 inches: gravelly coarse sand C2-43 to 66 inches: coarse sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Excessively drained Runoff class: Very low 16 Custom Soil Resource Report Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to very high (1.42 to 14.17 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Maximum salinity. Nonsaline (0.0 to 1.9 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low(about 5.3 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1 Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: F149BY005MA- Dry Outwash Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Barnstable Percent of map unit. 5 percent Landform: Moraines on outwash plains Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder, backslope, footslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, head slope, side slope, tread Down-slope shape: Linear, concave, convex Across-slope shape: Linear, concave, convex Ecological site: F149BY011 MA-Well Drained Till Uplands Hydric soil rating: No Riverhead Percent of map unit. 5 percent Landform: Outwash plains, moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, side slope, tread Down-slope shape: Linear, convex Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: F149BY006NY-Well Drained Outwash Hydric soil rating: No Montauk,sandy variant Percent of map unit. 5 percent Landform: Moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, side slope Down-slope shape: Convex, linear Across-slope shape: Convex Ecological site: F149BY009MA-Well Drained Dense Till Uplands Hydric soil rating: No Carver Percent of map unit. 5 percent Landform: Outwash plains, moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, side slope, tread Down-slope shape: Linear, convex Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: F149BY005MA- Dry Outwash Hydric soil rating: No 17 Custom Soil Resource Report PIC—Plymouth loamy coarse sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol. 2y1dy Elevation: 0 to 310 feet Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 52 inches Mean annual air temperature: 52 to 59 degrees F Frost-free period: 190 to 250 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Plymouth, loamy coarse sand, and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Plymouth, Loamy Coarse Sand Setting Landform: Outwash plains, hills, moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder, backslope, footslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, head slope, side slope, tread Down-slope shape: Linear, concave, convex Across-slope shape: Linear, concave, convex Parent material: Siliceous sandy and gravelly glaciofluvial deposits and/or sandy and gravelly supraglacial meltout till Typical profile Oi- 0 to 1 inches: slightly decomposed plant material Oe- 1 to 2 inches: moderately decomposed plant material A -2 to 3 inches: loamy coarse sand E-3 to 5 inches: coarse sand Bhs- 5 to 7 inches: cobbly loamy coarse sand Bw1 - 7 to 11 inches: cobbly loamy coarse sand Bw2- 11 to 22 inches: gravelly coarse sand BC-22 to 31 inches: gravelly coarse sand C1 -31 to 43 inches: gravelly coarse sand C2-43 to 66 inches: coarse sand Properties and qualities Slope: 8 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Excessively drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to very high (1.42 to 14.17 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Maximum salinity: Nonsaline (0.0 to 1.9 mmhos/cm) 18 Custom Soil Resource Report Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low(about 5.3 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: F149BY005MA- Dry Outwash Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Montauk,sandy variant Percent of map unit. 5 percent Landform: Moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, side slope Down-slope shape: Convex, linear Across-slope shape: Convex Ecological site: F149BY009MA-Well Drained Dense Till Uplands Hydric soil rating: No Barnstable Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Moraines on outwash plains Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder, backslope, footslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, head slope, side slope, tread Down-slope shape: Linear, concave, convex Across-slope shape: Linear, concave, convex Hydric soil rating: No Riverhead Percent of map unit.- 5 percent Landform: Outwash plains, moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, side slope, tread Down-slope shape: Linear, convex Across-slope shape: Linear Hydric soil rating: No Carver Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Outwash plains, moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, side slope, tread Down-slope shape: Linear, convex Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: F149BY005MA- Dry Outwash Hydric soil rating: No 19 Custom Soil Resource Report RdA—Riverhead sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol. 9x7q Elevation: 0 to 280 feet Mean annual precipitation: 45 to 50 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 54 degrees F Frost-free period: 150 to 225 days Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Riverhead and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description-of Riverhead Setting Landform: Outwash plains, moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex Parent material: Loamy glaciofluvial deposits overlying stratified sand and gravel Typical profile H1 0 to 12 inches: sandy loam H2- 12 to 27 inches: sandy loam H3-27 to 35 inches: gravelly loamy sand H4-35 to 65 inches: stratified coarse sand to gravelly sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: F149BY006NY-Well Drained Outwash Hydric soil rating: No 20 Custom Soil Resource Report Minor Components Haven Percent of map unit. 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Plymouth Percent of map unit. 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Sudbury Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Montauk,sandy variant Percent of map unit. 3 percent Hydric soil rating: No Riverhead, silt loam layers Percent of map unit: 2 percent Hydric soil rating: No RdB—Riverhead sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 9x7r Elevation: 0 to 330 feet Mean annual precipitation: 45 to 50 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 54 degrees F Frost-free period: 150 to 225 days Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Riverhead and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Riverhead Setting Landform: Outwash plains, moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex Parent material. Loamy glaciofluvial deposits overlying stratified sand and gravel Typical profile H1 -0 to 12 inches: sandy loam H2- 12 to 27 inches: sandy loam H3-27 to 35 inches: gravelly loamy sand 21 Custom Soil Resource Report H4-35 to 65 inches: stratified coarse sand to gravelly sand Properties and qualities Slope: 3 to 8 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low(about 5.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: F149BY006NY-Well Drained Outwash Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Haven Percent of map unit.5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Plymouth Percent of map unit. 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Bridgehampton Percent of map unit. 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Montauk,sandy variant Percent of map unit. 3 percent Hydric soil rating: No Riverhead,silt loam layers Percent of map unit:2 percent Hydric soil rating: No RdC—Riverhead sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 9x7s Elevation: 0 to 380 feet Mean annual precipitation: 45 to 50 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 54 degrees F Frost-free period. 150 to 225 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance 22 Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Composition Riverhead and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Riverhead Setting Landform: Outwash plains, moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex Parent material: Loamy glaciofluvial deposits overlying stratified sand and gravel Typical profile H1 -0 to 12 inches: sandy loam H2- 12 to 27 inches: sandy loam H3-27 to 35 inches. gravelly loamy sand H4-35 to 65 inches: stratified coarse-sand to gravelly sand Properties and qualities Slope: 8 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water supply,_0 to 60 inches: Low(about 5.1.inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: A' Ecological site: F149BY006NY-Well Drained Outwash Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Haven Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Montauk Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Plymouth Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Riverhead, eroded Percent of.map unit. 3 percent Hydric soil rating: No 23 Custom Soil Resource Report Riverhead, till substratum Percent of map unit: 2 percent Hydric soil rating: No 24 References U American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=n res142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/n res/detail/national/soils/?cid=nresl42p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nresl42p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/ home/?cid=n res 142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1,043084 25 Custom Soil Resource Report United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/ n res/detai I/soils/scientists/?cid=n res142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/? cid=nres142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl42p2_052290.pdf 26 Suffolk County Web Map Ir z f l <s 4 ..y` ,�r • �?� SUBJECT PROPERTY 10, 00 /,/ oF f • �( Y I'p�yl/tet 4V a st hit A't stlltt 6/812022, 8:08:25 AM 1:16,000 RECEIVED 0 013 025 0.5 '"' Ag Districts 1 JUN 10 2022 0 0.2 0A 0.8 km southold Town Planning Board