HomeMy WebLinkAboutERSAP EXISTING RESOURCES AND SITE ANALYSIS PLAN (ERSAP) NOTES: 10. THERE ARE NO CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS ON OR CONTIGUOUS TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS (CONTINUED):
1. THE BACKGROUND IMAGE FOR THE AREA SURROUNDING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WAS DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION EAF 1. SCTM:1000-083-02-013.8,OWNERS:DAVID&STEVEN ZUHOSKI(AGRICULTURAL) architects
FROM THE SUFFOLK COUNTY GIS VIEWER. MAPPING TOOL. 2. SCTM:1000-083-02-014,OWNERS:DAVID,JOHN,MICHAEL,SHARON&STEVEN
ZUHOSKI,ANNE LASOTA,LAURIE STEINER,&LISA EASTWOOD(AGRICULTURAL)
2. THERE ARE NO EXISTING STRUCTURES LOCATED ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, 11. CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE NEW YORK NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM(DATED OCTOBER 27,2021) 3. SCTM:1000-083-03-015.2,OWNERS:WJF FARMS LLC +INDICATED THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OCCURS WITHIN 1.25 MILES OF KNOWN, NON-WINTER 4. SCTM:1000-083-03-04.11,OWNERS:F&S LLC
3. THERE ARE NO WETLANDS ON,OR WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ACCORDING TO THE LOCATIONS FOR NORTHERN LONG-EARED BAT(MYOTIS SEPTENTRIONALIS). IN ADDITION,REVIEW OF 5. SCTM:1000-083-03-04.12,OWNERS:F&S LLC
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION,ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE THE NYS ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MAPPER, NY NATURE EXPLORER,AND USFWS IPAC DATABASE 6. SCTM:1000-084-03-02.0,OWNERS:GLENN F,GLENN F JR.,&JEFFREY W HEIDTMANN engineers
MAPPER. INDICATES THAT SEVERAL THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES HAVE POTENTIAL TO OCCUR AT
4. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE NASSAU-SUFFOLK SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
5. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THE SURROUNDING 500 FOOT AREA FALLS WITHIN ZONE X(AREAS OF ALTHOUGH THE RESOURCES CONSULTED INDICATE POTENTIAL PRESENCE OF THREATENED AND
ENDANGERED SPECIES,ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS MAY,OR MAY NOT,PROVIDE SUITABLE HABITAT
MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD) INDICATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL N0. FOR MANY OF THESE SPECIES.IN ORDER TO CONFIRM ACTUAL OR PROBABLE OCCURRENCE OF
36103C0142H AND 36103C0144H DATED 9/2255 12009. THESE SPECIES, LAND USE ECOLOGICAL SERVICES INC.(LUES)CONDUCTED A FIELD INVESTIGATION
AND IN-DEPTH ENDANGERED SPECIES ANALYSIS ON JUNE 1,2021.A COPY OF THE LUES REPORT IS 638 Broad Hollow Road,4th Floor East
6. ACCORDING TO THE PROTECTED LANDS WITHIN THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAPPER,THE SUBJECT Melville, NY 11747
PROPERTY AND ALL ABUT7ING PROPERTIES ARE NOT WITHIN AN AREA LEGALLY PROTECTED BY THE INCLUDED IN THE EXPANDED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SUBMITTED WITH THIS ERSAP. 631.756.8000•www.h2m.com
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK,THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,PRIVATE TRUSTS,QUALIFIED CONSERVATION 12. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING:
ORGANIZATIONS OR OTHER ENTITIES OR AGENCIES.
• THE BOUNDARY OF ANY CITY,VILLAGE OR TOWN;
7. A SOILS SURVEY AND REPORT FROM THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, NATURAL CONSULTANTS:
RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE FOR SUFFOLK COUNTY ACCOMPANIES THIS ERSAP. • THE BOUNDARY OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED COUNTY OR STATE PARK OR OTHER
8, ACCORDING TO THE NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF PARKS,RECREATION AND HISTORIC RECREATION AREA;
PRESERVATION'S CULTURAL RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEM (CRIS)MAPPER,THE SUBJECT • THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED COUNTY OR STATE PARKWAY,THRUWAY,
PROPERTY AND AND ABUTTING TRACTS ARE NOT LOCATED WITHIN AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SENSITIVE EXPRESSWAY,ROAD OR HIGHWAY;
AREA, NOR ARE THERE HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT SITES OR STRUCTURES LISTED ON THE • THE EXISTING OR PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ANY STREAM OR DRAINAGE CHANNEL OWNED BY
NATIONAL OR STATE REGISTER. THE COUNTY OR FOR WHICH THE COUNTY HAS ESTABLISHED CHANNEL LINES;
9. PORTIONS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE CURRENTLY CULTIVATED FOR SOD FARMING.THE . THE EXISTING OR PROPOSED BOUNDARY OF ANY COUNTY OR STATE OWNED LAND ON WHICH A
SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREAS ARE LOCATED WITHIN A DESIGNATED PUBLIC BUILDING OR INSTITUTION IS SITUATED;OR
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AS INDICATED ON THE SUFFOLK COUNTY GIS MAP ACCOMPANYING THIS MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
ERSAP. • AN EXISTING AIRPORT,AIRBASE OR AIRSTRIP.
O
WOODLANDS
S
I
6
L ._.-_ _1111.-- x � x x
�. x
x. 5xx
'4r x
TM 4
a
SCTM:1000.083.03-04.7
OWNER:NORTH FORK xx
RECYCLING INC SCTM:1000.096-01.017.5
a.
OWNER:TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
mom.
WOODLANDS
SCTM:1000.083-03-04.5 �s
WOODLANDS
OWNER:DONALD J GRIM 8 :
SCTM:J000-033-02-013.6 # "
ZUHOSKI
JEANNE M GRACE �+ E.,
OWNER:DAVID&STEVEN ZUH + + } }n.� ; .E . .v
(AGRICULTURAL) + + + + } + + +^. �-,-r-- +
® + + + } + # # F--+,+.+# + + + + + +
}- + + + + i• T + + + 4 + }U +ll1 FFe4M++ } +++++++++++ + + + ++++++ + + # +++++++++*++++
+
s
d`N0W�5ma�E�'11i
,.
..s.:. • .
S o/ckp�le-l-.l�s-M'{n„Po�'^76q✓P I_ I Mtia+s�on-ry-+B+am-4"�+ ++T_#I`++.,d�``/hfrr.+}�U.•-"6\,+�+t66{8'\6.ry61 t'f.1♦.8',3�t�7II..V.Iy'I IB.IIY I�-*11\;W*'�*WI1*\�W''"W 1f*-W r6*W-,*.1<y.*1**66 tW*.*,1-KW:M,W\*Y7•W W*W`*�W\W'6*66*fi*y5;114'`W.*Y 3W*Wy W W W/1*W W"B*W'1W,Q*W-W*W*�I WWW*W W-V•W NW W*-W*6*W W W W WW'�W7 W Wty._.W W^Wb.W 6 W eW Wfi3yWWms_.W-.AW7 W2W"��*W�*'W 1fiW`W+WW4#•WW6 W,W6 W.y W`W*/W*lW y yW WW*W r-YW W W1*'y,y.�r'W WLWFW-W&.We�*.]W+W W-W+-w W»W y W 0t*7.W iW_/6.W•W8xo 3W*y r.W 2*SWW ywi-t�*6.W*6JW W}�6�W*W.W 5W-W.*-*W.W W W_-Wr6W�3 W WW„;WW W4�W•.•V6W W W W1r66W'y 3y 4.WrW 6*..y+1W6 51**./*,Wy.W!W'6*/"••/.W W W 6W W:.W�::1WW 1*.W yW.r W6W.y*+WW yW¢.W•W*Wu W rW WsMW'y*^/W W reW'W*"yW�'.WW qW W e,.W�.W y*`W�WW Wr+W W W WW*WW W.1 W/,�y W•W W✓*W*W W-maWW W.*aW W'y.W W�fW*W yW•J W WW i W/*'VW/_W WW,W•.W*WS1*WW W'*W S W W W)TW W W*W-W*W.W-W'W 1W-+W�W y y,W(W`�W^i.W WI•y W W ysWW WyW4W W W 9W'*'�y�W/WW.*•W WW W W W 5W W y*-6�WwYW.W�fW'W0//�W*W'W„W„�y W W*.W 1W WW*tWWW+-!gy.;W W W*W-W,HW`*1y W y W./W,W WW W*WT yW W y*W W�"W-W T*W*-*�y W WW y'W,�W*�WW y*/W WWWWy1*W�W-W y\�W**lW W*'rW�W.*W+�W*y�.y WW*CW.WW W,1�W'***W W''W*iVy WW*xWo(`"W*.''�W W**yW 7y W*ZI'*Y W*y'/•W*y*
*W,W*W*W1W*MW-,�WW✓+=WW S{}W,W*W^s'W*6*,WW W'W*/,W*sWW.
*J-,hW W*W?*�WW W_✓`.WW W-yW'y W�W;y**J•.y1W_WJ WWW,-**-W Wa
y'*W-W'*WW�/W 6W aiW W�,.'W8*1•'»yfi16Wp,*.1 W.*Wb*._'W.WrY°+W.y/,,+*W'W W`W'�*.WW WYW W*W W*4/.W.W\X..W WW**`**yW W�WW W W-6GW W*6*\W�W.W_6vW�,/�•Y�WW'W*!*'.y WW/W yW w.y Wµ3WW.*W q�W*y*W_**W WW WW�1ayWWW WW W 1 W*.W.•4,�W W./6W W,,*.yW!4L W Wf Wr_W W-1 y aW�W*W-W,�-Wyyy yW�W*W-AW W W BW VW*..y-.'WyY�WWyW•W,y�W.WW W W.W WW*_*WW*W yW_�WW W W y W�WdW.y yVW y iy VW'yW WW W"y W/"*WW W'yWW WW WWy�W.`W W��W'W WW W/maWWW/*W*�yW W y_.W Wx*'W V1,(y*7y�W_.yW WB_*._,W'-�*W"`$W W 5�W-*q Q 3.-W 7Vey 6W�Y.6*8/.✓W W,68W..W 1*11W*1�JW W•W*0WW.*,yY*+W W W66Ww.WB1�W WW*/W w,.`W5WV1.1/*`*✓Y
W\W/W\'W**W/y W W WWyW y/yW�1�W,W W,*+**W**./W"*'W/W,W-'W*xW i�_W/�Wy**i6YYYyW Wt�.W W VyYW*ry W.'t/'/Wi•W1"WW*W�jeif"-W W W�'t`y**•"W W G•.W"B�.'*W�W W�W"WW�*fi-'WW�.yW PW yW W^Y/�y W/W.y 6�y•W1**f6W�
y W.�Nfi3{W*W*6W BW,.W sW3 W*W WcWW ey WW W W WlWlW1aW W�1Wy W5nW�6W WeWW 1YW�..o*1_WW uWWW W*sW/**W'WW W*8pW/W 6W�W m4yy�W V1 1 W rW/*pW W•4*W W W�W W yeyy W�Wr/+yWaWy'y ta,*r�W•eW WWrW a5WW�a*W 1sy_W W6W.'6Y 6yW;W.'y;W�*W•a:WWF.W W.y�.'d..t y W-*.W V*_WWAW y WWjImeW f,BWW y,Ww�
W WylyqaW WnFWyl W+VW'.W✓,�+W W W WWW y;W W**W-W RW*\W#ti*W+y W
WW,++W•}.�VW W*�W•,W++++"-�+W++W 0WWWW WW.}W+
imW WyW WW�W+ i } + +W`
W 1W,-+}W.1•1•,1 1 i*+'�W W*WWW*Wyy+D*y,WWyWWW1.}W(•-W+6_W W qWW�*!Wy W/*•..6/,+•i�W�+yW• +
Sb*�rWb�.W✓6�p*•+
J•+W*.W+ + +S W+y WI�•1'W*1+Q,1'l6+#1. X+W WW+*+W W y/W W.*W+•WV ++ }B,Y,4W J♦+W.-p-+WSW+ *+V"+
+`+
+y. }tWn W*+•y�-•W CWF/W W/�.W
+r.WWt-yiy W
+W W#W 7 nW 1Wo*t"�\0/�W,•
VYTWWfioi+
Wy'r
yW��1W W•F1*r_W�/1y*y**�*,i'r+'WX+++rtW
,W++�WW*WW''W:*j*�•/
+ '+
1W*+}#++#++ + + ++ + + + + #+#}#+++ # + + + ++++++.+++++++ + + + + + + + } + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ # + ++}i++}++}+++#++ + + + }}+}++ 4 + } + + # } + + + } + +
EXISTING STRUCTURE ON +*+* + * + * * # ` # ++ + + + + +++++f4++#i++4+++++++++++-++:+:+:+:++++++++++
4 ++++++++++
+}}+ + } + * + + } +++ + + + +++}++++i*+}}++++ +++++++#}+ } } }++
.6 ADJACENT PROPERTY(TYP.) } } } } + } + + + , + + +++} + +
+ + + + , } + + + + + +++++
+ + + + + + + + +++}+++++}++}+++ + + + + + + + #w ++++}}+++# #
* i + * * * + + + ++ IW}'W'WW
rWW ry WGWWWt-WWvW
W+W
I�
_*WW�*1y,O W_yy*+*OO.�W W.10WT W y 1`1.W`1.7 9{L fi''Wy W�y*''.•W*WW'+W-WWJ"�K"V.'j°,y,W.W6*WW.�W*WWgAW W*c�*qq J.�7Y~VW*WW W y Wy0`W�-W./y ry.�..�.''Wy4'_.IIT WMrW/W*6YW�W,'W�W�'°:-'s`5 W J�W*;/WwWWWlWLW6'A*yI•3��/.�W�4 yVIWYW'*•W��W'r.(/W W I*YrP;tW\D*'WyJ�W•rW W 66W�W J'W/VQg'y1+•/a 3*.y Wy..fW0�WO't}I6�{W/WD*FYo0WCWttV*jJW J1 I*W W W OQIW"+*y yWS1,WW OWIL.I1II6W.�WRY�(WW.�W 1*�W•\.I\•`y iW�,IW II6.IW��.*WeWW,0,*W~o W.j-Wy..r Y W-fy��W$W W y`r,.WW(Am\tVyI.-W.YW6..•*'1yYy3dl Wp W10\.*j7���WraW.-.W p/WW W.�o---�
yyyy0.•Wff JW W�V).yMWY y+MWW.,'�1��^f,y WYdJI^^y(IWII I yW(I.,y;W��'JW1N'W ksy'yW/W W q1W�\J'r,y.�.y'W.r.".�✓4y.04�.0M�'+�jW'•��WW.1y+ojf`Wry~y ratJWC
'�-I.`������'j(`'1%/ayw("x*�r�.`W+4IIVk2e'*Y'`NW"!+�yIt."'i��'[%`.'`►�J`,W
.IW^lfyI.W*I�I*,��.y^4<i�111II I I.��F•CC�C1I I""I�•Y+Vy!;W�.*W`**'p1.r,•"'+/`Y.`^�
y
',WI�v'yrW*W W*.W•�*,eI/(1 im-Wy�IyWIIWIWI�yW)*I�)WJ 1yI+
y WW W�r W'�y*'W WYWW%W\Oy,y�WA�,W AWW tW*�W�V'•+t�SS.W1*y0I`WIW`/..k1�WtlWY..y�6*I�^WPyNy
IIV�1yrWW�✓l V ayy*W,/1WW y
!WW*1W WW/l(Wyr(y
Sy
y
�W I
y*
WW YWWyqJW
y.
IIIBIi0!Yt�1tf�x
?
I
II
�I
I III'I•��I'�,.�l�//�A:rY/�?;�
P2A'%r
'[.
.Jg'rrvk'}ht�..
„
Y�
fi
l+
,
,yt
A,
S
\
I
t"f#
'r..4...
.�'
II
x --'
...
...
w e
"NLTMTgN OF THIS
DOCUMNTEXCEPT
BY lLpEf![
PROFESSIONAL
1L q
LL
°
F
OA
L
'
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +#+ ++++++++++++++++ + + DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: REV
I
EWED BY:
++ +++*#+}+++++++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + } RJR JMT RJR
AAWL AO+ + + + + i ++ PROJECT No.: DATE: SCALE:
+ f ♦ + + + + + + + KCEG 2101 JUNE 6, 2022 AS SHOWN+ + + + + + + +
CLIENT
SCTM:1000.083-03.05.3 +
OWNER:11goo OREGON ROAD LLC + moil KCE NY 26, LLC
+ #
#
•611 ,j avehePMEwbmntskrBeAe
4 m
"uSCTm016.1 rwrosv
- A D10 x15 .2.1IN
AEL MCBR1 E JAMES MICHOWNERf
RICHARD JAMES MCBRIDE *.51.,
(AGRa W **.6+++ �6 61.3 1 W Wy y+++ * -54.
+ NarNY
+++ 66 S
+ 66y y
- W * * W ` � y /
' * 1WSCTM:1000.083-02.15 +++ 6] W6W � * 459 KCE NY 26
OWNER:FRANK1CBRIDE 6 /
} + WSY 'l, •31]
y -518 -58.7AND SON INC WLTURAL) W 0S 56 �.1 4� 6558 nB(AGRICU611 9 F.lL � yyy
W W 633W 36
66 61
S "4u� WW f•WW Sft *0.fiM -\ J
•64.1W •61* W
*
513* W W W * _r/ W * /
. WEE
�.3 /' yW W *661 y • * * * * * * + W y * W_ i* - WW W `W` _� " * *
* * 7 � * * * *
Y 63/
ir- i� y 604* NDIW
W/ * W W Eli*
6/.8 -636y ®y4.1py * * JW Y/W WW W W W y * * * *
4,554
y * W W * W / I * * *- W -6wy * * WWWy* * 1/W07F.M W_* * WW * * W W*65.1
W
* .6441 6 •$ad
fig./ •fid. KEY CAPTURE
1573 W
* W 1 * * * 03
afii� *0.1 LW * W W W . O ENERGY
.62
.V,4 V53+ W * W W ✓W * * * W Y * W 51.N Y
%64.4 V' 05.9 W6 0
dA 15 +� 6.1 j .3
-54.1 Sa Woodd ee
_- -- - TEEM.,
63.d •63J •63.3 61.4 61
77
61.4 64.9 .54.7 •64.5
qSUBJECT PROPERTY I. WOODLANDS
SCTM:1000-095.02.01.1 SCTM:1000.096-01-02.0
OWNER:JPK SMM ACRES LLC OWNER:SOUTHOLD SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 10750 Oregon Road
Cutchogue, NY 11935
zCONTRACT
x
SCTM:1000.095.03-06.0 x X ALL CONTRACTS
OWNER:NORTH FORK
SCTM: 000.095-02-07.0 RECYCLING PROPERTY LLC
OWNER:NORTH FORK RECYCLING
PROPERTY LLC STATUS
REGULATORY REVIEW
SHEET TITLE
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 EXISTING RESOURCES AND SITE E
ANALYSIS PLANRECEIVED
(IN FEET)
1 inch= 100 ft. t JUN 10 2022
- Planning Board
NO.
SOUL O Own DRAWING
ERSAP
C)
USDA United States A product of the National Custom Soil Resource
Department of Cooperative Soil Survey,
Agriculture a joint effort of the United Report for
n I RCS
States Department of
I\v� Agriculture and other Suffolk County,Federal agencies, State
Natural agencies including the
Resources Agricultural Experiment New York
Conservation Stations, and local
Service participants
KCEG 2101
RECEIVED
JUN 10 2022
--So—u-t-ffiold Town
Planning Board
■
M :
.W4 µ1Y
h
f
0 700 ft
February 2, 2022
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning; onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain.conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https:Hoffices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist(http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for.buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,.
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at(202) 720-2600•(voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or(202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3
Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2
How Soil Surveys Are Made...............................................................................:..5
SoilMap.................................................................................................................. 8
SoilMap................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
MapUnit Legend......................................................................1......................... 11
MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Suffolk County, New York................................................................................13
HaA—Haven loam, O.to 2 percent slopes................................................... 13
HaB—Haven loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes................................................... 14
Ma—Made land...........................................................................................15
PIA—Plymouth loamy coarse sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes..........................16
PIC—Plymouth loamy coarse sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes....................... 18
RdA—Riverhead sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes...................................20
RdB—Riverhead sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes...................................21
RdC—Riverhead sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes................................ 22
References............................................................................................................25
4
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource.
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus,-during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5
Custom.Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests..Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
6
Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
7
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map 3
709290 719350 709440 709530 709M 709710 709900 709890 709950 710070 0
41°2 1"N Ste.-, - 41°2
t+
Ilk
f
�X.
i-
� a
_ � � � { ger,.► � �:�T ,�
f
art ddd
� q r
s
n•.t be valid at
Oman
al
41°1'43'N ..
1
70MBO 709350 709440 7R9597 709620 709710 709900 709890 709990 1�r0
3
Map Scale:1:3,910 if printed on A landscape(11"x 8.5')sheet
N Meters
n 0 50 100 200 300
Feet
,\ 0 150 300 600 600
Map projection:Web Mercator Corner coordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zone 18N WGS84
9
Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest(AOI) Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
Area of Interest(AOI) 1:20,000.
® Stony Spot
Soils Very Stony Spot
U Soil Map Unit Polygons Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot
r.� Soil Map Unit Lines Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
Other misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
® Soil Map Unit Points 9 PP 9 Y
.� Special Line Features line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of
Special Point Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
U Blowout Water Features scale.
Streams and Canals
Borrow Pit
Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Clay Spot
Rails measurements.
i-�-►
0 Closed Depression
Interstate Highways
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Gravel Pit
cra US Routes Web Soil Survey URL:
Gravelly Spot Major Roads Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857)
Landfill Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
A. Lava Flow Background projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the
Marsh or swamp . Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more
Mine or Quarry accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
0 Miscellaneous Water This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
0 Perennial water of the version date(s)listed below.
V Rock Outcrop Soil Survey Area: Suffolk County, New York
+ Saline Spot Survey Area Data: Version 19, Sep 1,2021
e Sandy Spot Soil map units are labeled (as space allows)for map scales
.gj. Severely Eroded Spot 1:50,000 or larger.
0 Sinkhole Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Jul 29,2020—Aug
�y Slide or Slip 21,2020
oa Sodic Spot
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
10
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol • Map Unit Name Acres in AOl Percent 6fA01
HaA Haven loam,0 to 2 percent 15.3 56.5%
slopes
HaB Haven loam,2 to 6 percent 4.6 17.0%
slopes
Ma Made land 0.1 0.4%
PIA Plymouth loamy coarse sand,0 3.0 11.2%
to 3 percent slopes
PIC Plymouth loamy coarse sand,8 3.3 12.0%
to 15 percent slopes
RdA Riverhead sandy loam,0 to 3 0.0 0.0%
percent slopes
RdB Riverhead sandy loam,3 to 8 0.6 2.3%
percent slopes
RdC Riverhead sandy loam,8 to 15 0.2 0.6%
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 27.2 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
11
Custom Soil Resource Report
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity; degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12
Custom Soil Resource Report
Suffolk County, New York
HaA—Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 9x6v
Elevation: 0 to 310 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 45 to 50 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 54 degrees F
Frost-free period: 150 to 225 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Haven and similar soils: 75 percent
Minor components:25 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Haven
Setting
Landform: Outwash plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy glaciofluvial deposits over sandy and gravelly glaciofluvial
deposits
Typical profile
Oa-0 to 2 inches: highly decomposed plant material
H1 -2 to 5 inches: loam
H2-5 to 19 inches: loam
BC- 19 to 28 inches: gravelly loam
C-28 to 60 inches: stratified gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1
Hydrologic.Soil Group: B
Ecological site: F149BY006NY-Well Drained Outwash
Hydric soil rating: No
13
Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Scio
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Montauk
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed soils, gravelly
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Riverhead
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Bridgehampton
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
HaB—Haven loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 9x6w
Elevation: 0 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 45 to 50 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 54 degrees F
Frost-free period. 150 to 225 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Haven and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 20 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Haven
Setting
Landform: Outwash plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy glaciofluvial deposits over sandy and gravelly glaciofluvial
deposits
Typical profile
Oa- 0 to 2 inches: highly decomposed plant material
H9 -2 to 5 inches: loam
14
Custom Soil Resource Report
H2- 5 to 19 inches: loam
BC- 19 to 28 inches: gravelly loam
C-28 to 60 inches: stratified gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low(about 4.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Ecological site: F149BY006NY-Well Drained Outwash
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Riverhead
Percent of map unit. 8 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Montauk
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Bridgehampton
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Haven,thick surface
Percent of map unit. 2 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Ma—Made land
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 9x6z
Elevation: 100 to 1,600 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 45 to 50 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 54 degrees F
Frost-free period. 150 to 225 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Made land: 100 percent
15
Custom Soil Resource Report
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Made Land
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7s
Hydric soil rating: No
PIA—Plymouth loamy coarse sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2zgh0
Elevation: 0 to 260 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 52 to 59 degrees F
Frost-free period: 190 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Plymouth, loamy coarse sand, and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 20 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Plymouth, Loamy Coarse Sand
Setting
Landform: Outwash plains, hills, moraines
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder, backslope, footslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, head slope, side slope, tread
Down-slope shape: Linear, concave, convex
Across-slope shape: Linear, concave, convex
Parent material. Siliceous sandy and gravelly glaciofluvial deposits and/or sandy
and gravelly supraglacial meltout till
Typical profile
Oi-0 to 1 inches: slightly decomposed plant material
Oe- 1 to 2 inches: moderately decomposed plant material
A -2 to 3 inches: loamy coarse sand
E-3 to 5 inches: coarse sand
Bhs-5 to 7 inches: cobbly loamy coarse sand
Bw1 - 7 to 11 inches: cobbly loamy coarse sand
Bw2- 11 to 22 inches: gravelly coarse sand
BC-22 to 31 inches: gravelly coarse sand
C1 -31 to 43 inches: gravelly coarse sand
C2-43 to 66 inches: coarse sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
16
Custom Soil Resource Report
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to very
high (1.42 to 14.17 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity. Nonsaline (0.0 to 1.9 mmhos/cm)
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low(about 5.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F149BY005MA- Dry Outwash
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Barnstable
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Moraines on outwash plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder, backslope, footslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, head slope, side slope, tread
Down-slope shape: Linear, concave, convex
Across-slope shape: Linear, concave, convex
Ecological site: F149BY011 MA-Well Drained Till Uplands
Hydric soil rating: No
Riverhead
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Outwash plains, moraines
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, side slope, tread
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across-slope shape: Linear
Ecological site: F149BY006NY-Well Drained Outwash
Hydric soil rating: No
Montauk,sandy variant
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Moraines
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, side slope
Down-slope shape: Convex, linear
Across-slope shape: Convex
Ecological site: F149BY009MA-Well Drained Dense Till Uplands
Hydric soil rating: No
Carver
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Outwash plains, moraines
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, side slope, tread
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across-slope shape: Linear
Ecological site: F149BY005MA- Dry Outwash
Hydric soil rating: No
17
Custom Soil Resource Report
PIC—Plymouth loamy coarse sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 2y1dy
Elevation: 0 to 310 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 52 to 59 degrees F
Frost-free period: 190 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Plymouth, loamy coarse sand, and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 20 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Plymouth, Loamy Coarse Sand
Setting
Landform: Outwash plains, hills, moraines
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder, backslope, footslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, head slope, side slope, tread
Down-slope shape: Linear, concave, convex
Across-slope shape: Linear, concave, convex
Parent material: Siliceous sandy and gravelly glaciofluvial deposits and/or sandy
and gravelly supraglacial meltout till
Typical profile
Oi- 0 to 1 inches: slightly decomposed plant material
Oe- 1 to 2 inches: moderately decomposed plant material
A -2 to 3 inches: loamy coarse sand
E-3 to 5 inches: coarse sand
Bhs- 5 to 7 inches: cobbly loamy coarse sand
Bw1 - 7 to 11 inches: cobbly loamy coarse sand
Bw2- 11 to 22 inches: gravelly coarse sand
BC-22 to 31 inches: gravelly coarse sand
C1 -31 to 43 inches: gravelly coarse sand
C2-43 to 66 inches: coarse sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to very
high (1.42 to 14.17 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline (0.0 to 1.9 mmhos/cm)
18
Custom Soil Resource Report
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low(about 5.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F149BY005MA- Dry Outwash
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Montauk,sandy variant
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Moraines
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, side slope
Down-slope shape: Convex, linear
Across-slope shape: Convex
Ecological site: F149BY009MA-Well Drained Dense Till Uplands
Hydric soil rating: No
Barnstable
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Moraines on outwash plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder, backslope, footslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, head slope, side slope, tread
Down-slope shape: Linear, concave, convex
Across-slope shape: Linear, concave, convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Riverhead
Percent of map unit.- 5 percent
Landform: Outwash plains, moraines
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, side slope, tread
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Carver
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Outwash plains, moraines
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, side slope, tread
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across-slope shape: Linear
Ecological site: F149BY005MA- Dry Outwash
Hydric soil rating: No
19
Custom Soil Resource Report
RdA—Riverhead sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 9x7q
Elevation: 0 to 280 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 45 to 50 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 54 degrees F
Frost-free period: 150 to 225 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Riverhead and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 20 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description-of Riverhead
Setting
Landform: Outwash plains, moraines
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy glaciofluvial deposits overlying stratified sand and gravel
Typical profile
H1 0 to 12 inches: sandy loam
H2- 12 to 27 inches: sandy loam
H3-27 to 35 inches: gravelly loamy sand
H4-35 to 65 inches: stratified coarse sand to gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F149BY006NY-Well Drained Outwash
Hydric soil rating: No
20
Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Haven
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Plymouth
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Sudbury
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Montauk,sandy variant
Percent of map unit. 3 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Riverhead, silt loam layers
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
RdB—Riverhead sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 9x7r
Elevation: 0 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 45 to 50 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 54 degrees F
Frost-free period: 150 to 225 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Riverhead and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 20 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Riverhead
Setting
Landform: Outwash plains, moraines
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Loamy glaciofluvial deposits overlying stratified sand and gravel
Typical profile
H1 -0 to 12 inches: sandy loam
H2- 12 to 27 inches: sandy loam
H3-27 to 35 inches: gravelly loamy sand
21
Custom Soil Resource Report
H4-35 to 65 inches: stratified coarse sand to gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 3 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low(about 5.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F149BY006NY-Well Drained Outwash
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Haven
Percent of map unit.5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Plymouth
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Bridgehampton
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Montauk,sandy variant
Percent of map unit. 3 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Riverhead,silt loam layers
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
RdC—Riverhead sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 9x7s
Elevation: 0 to 380 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 45 to 50 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 54 degrees F
Frost-free period. 150 to 225 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
22
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Composition
Riverhead and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 20 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Riverhead
Setting
Landform: Outwash plains, moraines
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy glaciofluvial deposits overlying stratified sand and gravel
Typical profile
H1 -0 to 12 inches: sandy loam
H2- 12 to 27 inches: sandy loam
H3-27 to 35 inches. gravelly loamy sand
H4-35 to 65 inches: stratified coarse-sand to gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply,_0 to 60 inches: Low(about 5.1.inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A'
Ecological site: F149BY006NY-Well Drained Outwash
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Haven
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Montauk
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Plymouth
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Riverhead, eroded
Percent of.map unit. 3 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
23
Custom Soil Resource Report
Riverhead, till substratum
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
24
References
U
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=n res142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/n res/detail/national/soils/?cid=nresl42p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nresl42p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=n res 142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service..
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1,043084
25
Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/detai I/soils/scientists/?cid=n res142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl42p2_052290.pdf
26
Suffolk County Web Map
Ir z
f
l
<s 4
..y` ,�r • �?� SUBJECT PROPERTY
10,
00
/,/
oF
f • �( Y I'p�yl/tet
4V a st hit A't stlltt
6/812022, 8:08:25 AM
1:16,000
RECEIVED 0 013 025 0.5 '"'
Ag Districts 1
JUN 10 2022 0 0.2 0A 0.8 km
southold Town
Planning Board