HomeMy WebLinkAbout765Stro~son ~oad
Cutchogue~, New York
~765
April 29, 1965
Page 4
DENIED permission to divide property with
insufficient frontage on property. E/S Strohson
Road, Cutchog~e, New York.
,VIES, GREENPORT, N. Y" FRIDAY, APRIL 23, 1965
L~EGAL NOTIOE ! 8:15 P~VI. (E.D.S.T.), Upon ap-
NOTICE OF }IEA!~INC~ !plication of Ar~d and ~y
P~a~t ~ Sec~n 267 of the~~tchell' Inc.~, ~ain ~, Orient,
New Y~k, for a va~nce ~ ac-
Town Law a~ ~e pro~s of',cor~nce with the Zo~ Ordin-
the a~nded B~D~ Zone ~- ~ ance, Article IV, ~tion ~0, Sub-
di~ce of ~ Town of Sou~old, ~ section 16, ~d Article IV, ~tion
Suffolk County, New York, public~ ~
h~gs will ~ held by the Zon- ~ ~eesso~ building ~ the front
lng B~d of A~s of ~e~oWn~v~rd a aa Loc t'n o n ~ v'
of S~t~old, at ~e Town ~fice
~i~ R~d ~uthold, New York, lYork, b~d~ ~o~th by Wilc~
on April 29, 1965, on the foll~ ~ ~velo~ent Co~., e~t by G.
~ppeals:
~:30 P.~. (E.D.S.T.), U~n ~-~bv ~u~h Yo~.
.pli~ion .of Silver Sa~ Motel, ~ ~Any ~n d~sir~g ~ ~ ~eard
Silvermere ~, Gr~n~rt, New~on ~he ~ve ~tio~ ~ld
York, for a s~cial exception in
~c~dance wi~h ~e ~ning ~-
di~n~, Article III, ~t~n 300,
N~ Y~rk, ,bounded north by
North ~oad (C. R. 2~A,, east by~
C. Geiger, south by Long Island
Railroad, west by K. D. Case.
7:40 pjM. (E.D.S~T.), Upon .s~p-
I plication of ttarold Simonson,
Strolason l~ad, Cutchogue, New
York, for a variance in accordance
w~th the Zoning Ordinance, Arti-
cle III, Section 303, ~and Artcle X,
!Section 1000A, for permission to
' divide property: Location of prop-
erty: east side Strelason Road,
Cutm~h~gue, New York, bounded
North by I-L Renwood, east by
Creek, south by Seaman-Mans-
f~eld, and west by Strohson Road.
8:0{) P.M. (E.D~S.~r.), Upon ap-
plication of A. Reilly & Sons, Inc.,
Aiattit~lck, New York, a/c Robert
Ogilvie, Matt~t~ck, New York, for
~ variance in accordance with
the Z,oning Ordinance, Article III,
Section 305, for permission to
erect an ,addition with insuffi-
cient .front yard set bs~k. Loca-
tion of property: south side pri-
vate road, off the east side of Cox
Neck Road, Mattituck, New York,
,bounded north by Fox R011ow
Road, east ,by Kenneth Ramsa~uer,
south by Mattituck Creek, west by
i Jul~a~n Cargill. _---
~::.~.~.:'~.~ .......... being duly Sworn,
~ter aad Publisher of the SUFFOLK
~hed at Greenport, in said county;
ich the annexed is a printed copy,
said Suffolk Times once in each
............. ~[~ ~. ......................... week~
........ 19.~..~
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK _,'-~"~ ~
APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR APPEAL NO.
TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOW:N OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y.
Strohson Road
Harold Simonson · ....~ ............ of ............................................................................
1; (~;~') .................................................
Name of Appellor~t Street and Number
Peconic .~...e..~.....~...o.~ ........ HEREBY APPEAL TO
Municipality State
THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECtSION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON
.....................................
WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO
Harold Simons on
' Name of Applicant for
of '~$~ohson Road ~~:~ew York
........ : ........................................... .......... .......................
Street and Number
( ) PERMIT TO USE
( ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY
(x)-:.':Permi~ t'o~ ~vide' property ~i k;:~ TM '~' ' ~
1.' LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY .....
Street Use District on Zoning Map
Map No. Lot No.
2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub-
section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordi~n'ance.)
A~t. III Sec ~0~ & Art. X Sec 1000A
3, TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for
(X) ;. A-VARIANCE 1~o the,Zoning Ordinance or Zoning. Mgp,-.~ ~ '.; .... : . -: ' '
A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New ~o_,r~Tow_n;L, aw Chap 62 Cons. Laws
Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3
4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal ~ (ho~ not) been made with respect to this decision
of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property.
Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit
( ) request for a variance
and was made in Appeal No ................................. Dated ......................................................................
REASON FOR APPEAL
( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3
~ ) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance
.is requested for.~.the.[e,aso, r.t.th.a~t....I,,~is~h..t~ conve,y the so.uthe~rtlY 85 feet of my
.LO~; =O my Gaugn~err,, ~t-~arion J~, ~yzmans~i who p±aus., o build a residence
thereon
~'orm ZBI
(Cant hue on other side)
REASON FOR APPEAL
Continued
1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces-
~con/ HARDSHIP because although my lot has a frontage of 223 feet, I
not feel that I can convey out more than 85 feet due to the fact that
I have a number of fruit trees which I should like to retain and
they are much too large for transplanting.
2. The hardshipcreatedis UNIQUE andisnotshared by all p~pe~ies ali~ in the immediate
vicinity ofthis property andin this use district be~use this is the only property which
would be affected. The other properties on the east side of Strohson
Road are single lots and I own the acreage opposite on the West side
of Strohson Road.
3. The Variance would obse~e the spirit of the O~inance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE
CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT b~ause the lot immediately south of this
property owned by Mr. Seaman only has a frontage of 80 feet.
The square'footage however of this lot is ~ell over the zon.~g
requirements.
STATE OF NEW YORK )
)
COUNTY OF Suffolk )
SS
Signature
Sworn to this ................... ..]:.~...~...h.. ................. day of ............. .~..]~,.~.~..]: .............................. 1965
I
1