The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About831 ticle X, Section 10~7, Subsection (E), oi E. Kenneth Tabor, Orchard Street, tion in accordance with the Zonint Ordinance, Article X, I~ection 1003A .for permission to add an a~l~iit!pnal hottslng u~i~ ~-~ ~1~9 existin~ farm Iabo.~ camp. Location of pr0per£y: south s de 91_'¢h~rfl ~reet~ Ori~tlt, New York, bo~mded llorth by Orchard Street, east 8:30 P. M. (E.S.T.), ~pon application DATED,! ~March JO. 1966 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK / STATE OF NEW YORKI ss: C. Whitney Booth, Jr., being duly sworn, says thor he is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER - MATTITUCK WATCHMAN, a public news- paper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is o printed copy, has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watch- ~an once each week for ...... a-;~'~-~.....~../...~' ..... wee~ successively, commencing on the .................. Z .................... day of ..... ,,;..~..,..~,;C.,....~.,...., I/0..t,~ .... ........................... ~ .. ... 2 ............ / Sworn to before mo thls ........ ~...; ...........dog of ....... .2..:z:.z~:~ ....... 19.~.~.. YORK E~C~PT~O~ TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOTJTHOLD, N. Y. .... .er.....Co. ............................. .: ........................... .: ........................................................ I, (We) Name St~ree~ and Number ~' U ...................................... ~t...~ ............................................................... ................ ..0..~ ~...~.~Q~...i~...~ .............................. S~ate, Municip~/ity he~.eby apply to THE ZONIL%G BOAI~D O~ APP-.ALS fro' a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in acco~da~oe wi,th the ZONING O~DI~AI~E At~T~CT,~ ~ SECTION !00~ TITE SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS I{EQUESTED t~ECAUSE $ We must build an addition on ~%Lr present business building to house additional freezer equipment te maintain proper storage for o~ seafood business. The proposed_ addition will be a two story ~ 20ft X 7~ft addition on the westerly side of the present building~ of s~i!ar type construction. There will be aproximately %3 ft to the westerly property line from the proposed addition and aproximate!y ~6 ft to the southerly property line from the proposed addition. 0u~ business has increas~ to ~he point that additional freezer spaoe is ab~oiutely essentiat~ the neoessary handeling equipment now kept out of doors will be stored in the southerly part of the new addition. ~y f~'ther i~ormation required, by the Board will be supplied as needed. FOR~ ZB2 Appeal No. ~ ACTION OF THE ZONYNG BOAI~D OF APPEALS Dated NovIIbOP 1970 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DATE "J~'W'"311 1970 Appellant at a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on '~4O'Oll~2' was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your ( ) Request for variance due to lack of access to property ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance ~ ) Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) the appeal L SPECIAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a special exception ( ) be granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article .................... Section .................... Subsection .................... paragraph .................... of the Zoning Ordinance and the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) be Fee 2. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) produce hardship because practical difficulties or unnecessary (b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because (c) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) change the character of the district because (would not) and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( that the previous decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed. ) be denied and FORM ZB4 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS of 0 · · · · 5~ CHA~s ~'~..~erry, G~e poin~ you ~ere .'~k~9 le that ~OU~0~O ~0~ ~)~D OF AP~A~ -23- ~4A~ 24, lg66 ~ C;;~z ~,~e ~n .U~to t~JLe ~hen ~o tr~ to sonln9 ~ent ~nto e~£ecto R. Tt~KRY, 3R. ,~SQ.: A specAal exception should have been applAed ~ when the last alteratica wa~ made, the t~o stor~ be transferred to a ~usl~eoo ~o~e. ;~be th~o ~hole area ~ t~ t~ z~i~ Ord~ w~ ~et up, ~d ~d w~ 2~ed, It w~ ~s~e to ~dict what buei~esee ~ld su~i~ and JA~S ~t You ~tu~*t ~.~o into the ~uperm~ke~s, and everything wash · = kel~ ~eno the oz'1~1 ~u~l~ng? of w~ s~ ~ ~ or1~1~ bu/14!~,~ ~d ~ ~he pr~nt ~(~O~ /L~AI,~I ~x, would you l~ke %o i~ave '~.~, ~,o. xt door ~o youx ~40, 000. O0 h~ae ? to ~tt~J bulldAngs ~n m~ ~ac~ Zar~ (An alternative locatlo~ fo~ the ~o~d dloct~,Sed, ho~0ver, theEe ~ no et/mr feas~le loc&=to~ fo~ ~11tlcm that t~ ~=o~o~e~. ) (There was ~o r~n~o. ) ~a vmie~.a,~.tm ,~ua,l.e~o ~ ~.1.~, .t.o enJ. a=~ed and/or ~ ~.one the .~Linu~es o£ ~e ~out..holcl To~m ZLo,~'d o~ ./ OU U'-~CHO ~UE k¥ l~ R ~ O I~ ' / >~--~x~ , CU TC/-A i~arch 18, 1966. Zoning Board of Appea2s Southold, L,I. ~aroh £4 public hearing re Braun Oyster I£ t~e desired expansion of a non-con- forming building means the two-story high ~ray building adjacent to the original oyster shop, I am a~:ainst it. Said gray bui!din!: was put up without my knowledge and without a public hearing ~t a time w~en a 2oni~g 0rdinan(e was in e£~ect and a Building Inspector on duty. It certainly is no pleasure to loo~ at a grey building in a resi6ential ~ection. I want you to know ~net whenever' tho machines in said gray building are ruzm- in~~, I hear the vibration in my kitchen, pantry, clinilog room and somegi~nes in my living room. An expansion west of s~id gray building would compel me to look at a still larger grzy building an~x would increase the vib- ration in my house to a greater extent. I cannot help but object to s~id desir- e~ expansion. Best wishes,