Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAKRF, Inc Southold Zoning ProposalPROPOSAL Presented To: The Town of Southold For: Southold Town Zoning Update Date: June 2, 2022 Environmental, Planning, and Engineering Consultants 1695 Church Street Unit 3 Holbrook, NY 11741 tel: 631 285-6980 fax: 929 284-1085 www.akrf.com Offices in New York ● New Jersey ● Pennsylvania ● Maryland ● Connecticut June 2, 2022 Heather Lanza, Town Planning Director Town of Southold Town Clerk’s Office 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Southold Town Zoning Update Dear Ms. Lanza: AKRF, Inc. (AKRF) is pleased to submit a proposal for the above referenced project. Enclosed you will find eight (8) copies of our proposal, and one (1) flash drive with a digital copy of our proposal in PDF format. Our familiarity with the Town of Southold, coupled with the firm’s extensive experience conducting environmental reviews for comprehensive plans, projects involving zoning updates and modifications, and other projects requiring planning and environmental review throughout Long Island, makes AKRF uniquely qualified to assist the Town in reviewing and updating its zoning through the lens of making changes that will help advance the implementation of its updated comprehensive plan. AKRF understands the project. We understand that the Town of Southold is looking to procure a consultant with diverse expertise in land use and zoning issues, municipal planning, and conducting SEQRA environmental reviews, in order to analyze the Town’s zoning code and recommend changes that will served to help implement the Southold Town Comprehensive Plan Update. AKRF assisted the Town of Southold Planning Department with the preparation of the Transportation and Infrastructure Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan Update, as well as prepared the graphics for the plan update. AKRF provides complementary expertise for the project. I will serve as the Principal in Charge for this effort. I have 30+ years of experience working on projects in Nassau and Suffolk Counties. I will serve as a working member of the team, lending my experience to this effort for its successful completion, including my recent experience with the environmental review for the Town’s comprehensive plan, preparation of the Suffolk County Comprehensive Master Plan-2035, and outreach coordinator for the Town of Riverhead’s comprehensive plan update. As you know, I have a home in Southold, making this project of personal as well as professional interest to me. Robert M. White will also help to provide the appropriate level of project oversight. Bob and I each have decades of experience working on municipal planning projects on Long Island and are currently managing an update to the Town of Riverhead’s comprehensive plan. Lorianne DeFalco, AICP, LEED Green Associate, will serve as Project Manager. Ms. DeFalco has 20 years of experience in municipal planning on Long Island including comprehensive plans, downtown revitalization and zoning strategies, and Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) and Expanded Environmental Assessment Forms (EAFs) in conformance with SEQRA. Ms. DeFalco grew up on Long Island and has worked with many of its towns and villages; her background and experience gives her insight Heather Lanza 2 June 2, 2022 with respect to local planning issues. As Project Manager, Ms. DeFalco will be responsible for coordinating with the Town and providing overall project oversight and management. At the same time, Ms. DeFalco will direct the technical analyses. Ms. DeFalco was Project Manager for the Town’s environmental review for the comprehensive plan. AKRF’s depth of knowledge is not just at the management level. Our staff of over 300 employees include planners and market analysts, zoning specialists, traffic and transportation planners and engineers, urban designers and landscape architects, civil and environmental engineers, hazardous materials investigation and remediation specialists, air quality analysts, acoustic and vibration specialists, historians and archaeologists, water and natural resource specialists, and graphic and web designers. We plan to leverage this amazing pool of talent to provide the comprehensive, multi-disciplinary assessment that is essential for the project. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to continuing to work with the Town of Southold on this exciting project. Please do not hesitate to call me at (646) 388-9742 or Lorianne at (631) 574-3726 if you have any questions. AKRF, Inc. Stephen James Holley Senior Vice President Lorianne DeFalco, AICP, LEED Green Associate Senior Technical Director TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter of Interest 1 Qualifications Firm Background Resumes Firm Experience References 2 Approach to the Project & Project Schedule 3 Work Samples 4 Proposed Budget 1. QUALIFICATIONS 1. QUALIFICATIONS Firm Background As a medium-sized company, AKRF combines the breadth and resources of larger firms with the specialized know- how and attentiveness offered by smaller ones to complete a wide variety of projects, and deliver solutions with substantial, measurable value. Our experience in the field and commitment to our clients has made us one of the most respected firms in the Northeast. Because we work in a variety of settings for both public and private clients, we have particular expertise in planning for communities, where our professional skills are used to address conservation, preserva- tion, and economic development. AKRF’s municipal and regional planners have been providing a range of services to communities throughout the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast since our founding 40 years ago. Environmental and land use approvals have been central to AKRF’s mission throughout our history. Our staff prepares and manages a variety of projects for cities, towns, villages, and counties, including: • Special Area Plans • Zoning Amendments • Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Plans • Comprehensive Plans/Sustainable Master Plans • Public Outreach/Surveys/Communication Strategy • Environmental Reviews • Open Space and Farmland Plans/Trail Plans • Watershed Management/Habitat Protection To provide our clients with thorough analyses, plans, or designs, our staff evaluate existing conditions, build consensus with involved parties, and develop strategies to support sustainable growth, all while respecting the local character of a neighborhood, city, or region. From planning and design of small community gateways and centers to transforming manufacturing areas into vibrant commercial development to integrating regional transportation, economic, and redevelopment studies, AKRF applies this approach to community planning and regional development. No matter the scale of the assignment, our planners focus first on the objectives and desired outcomes. Utilizing a strong public engagement process, we work closely with all stakeholders to ensure that our assignment addresses the needs of the decision-makers and the general public. Long Island Experience AKRF has worked throughout Long Island since our founding in 1981, including several projects with the Town of Southold. We offer the expertise of a specialized staff that understands the unique characteristics and issues of Long Island’s communities. Our work on Long Island is both varied and extensive. Between 2015 and 2020, AKRF worked with the Town of Southold’s Planning Department on several projects, including the Love Lane Safety and Traffic Engineering Study; the New Suffolk Parking Study; and three projects centered around the Town’s Comprehensive Plan Update (Southold Comprehensive Plan Transportation and Infrastructure Chapter, SEQRA Review of Southold Comprehensive Plan, and the Southold Comprehensive Plan Graphic Design), which all related to the current proposal to update the Town’s zoning lde in support of advancing the Updated Comprehensive Plan’s goals and objectives. In 2014-2015, AKRF worked closely with Suffolk County to develop the new comprehensive plan (the first for Suffolk County in over 40 years). During this process, AKRF developed a deep understanding of the opportunities and challenges in the county, as well as the administration’s priorities to make the county a more prosperous place where a high quality of life and economic progress can complement Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southoldt04 each other. New and more diverse housing options, economic opportunities that provide high-paying jobs, and sustainable development that also reduces the county’s dependence on automobiles are only a few major topics that will require the attention of officials, planners, and the public. In addition to working on the Framework for the Future plan, where we worked closely with staff from the Department of Economic Development and Planning, as well as our ongoing environmental review and permitting work for Suffolk County Department of Public Works on the Smith Point Bridge Replacement project, AKRF has provided a wide range of environmental planning, engineering, and consulting services for a variety of projects. Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold 05 Stephen Holley Senior Vice President / Role: Principal-in-Charge Nina Peek, AICP is a Vice President and Director of AKRF’s Hudson Valley office with Stephen Holley, Senior Vice President, has extensive experience in environmental review involving the preparation of Environmental Assessments (EAs) and Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) in conformance with the environmental review procedures under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), and New York City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR). Routinely serving as a Principal–in-Charge or Project Manager, his particular expertise is with large-scale transportation and infrastructure projects, and area-wide planning initiatives, such as the New York State Department of State Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA) studies. BOA studies include land use and zoning analyses, and often involve conducting analyses to develop zoning change recommendations designed to further the implementation of the BOA goals, similar to developing recommendations for zoning changes that would help support and help implement recommendations of a town’s comprehensive plan. Stephen’s broad background also includes other planning studies and analysis of land use, environmental justice, air quality, noise, hazardous materials, natural resources, infrastructure, project alternatives, construction impacts, and mitigation. Mr. Holley, an expert in technical Spanish translation, has coordinated extensive public outreach programs. His training also includes developing and performing soil and groundwater sampling analyses, and other EIS-related assignments. Relevant Experience Town of Riverhead Comprehensive Plan Update, Long Island, NY In 2020, AKRF was selected to perform the surveys, data gathering, public outreach and analyses required to prepare an update to the Town of Riverhead's Comprehensive Plan, last updated in 2003. The Town of Riverhead, with an area of approximately 201 square miles (67.5 square miles of land and 133.5 water), has a resident population of approximately 40,000 residents spread throughout 11 hamlets. The Town is faced with a number of land use challenges and development opportunities, including retail vacancies, and growing demand for housing, agricultural and natural resource concerns, and includes two federal Opportunity Zones as well as a New York State Department of State designated Brownfield Opportunity Area. As part of this effort AKRF has been performing land use and zoning analyses and has updated the Town’s Zoning Map, converting it to a digital format, collected demographic information, and oversaw transportation and infrastructure surveys, among other efforts. AKRF is also examining the 2003 Comprehensive Plan’s goals, and assisting the Town, through an extensive public outreach process, in updating and augmenting the 2003 goals to reflect the changes that have occurred in the Town since the adoption of the 2003 Plan, and the stated goals of the Town’s current leadership and desires expressed by the public during the outreach process. The extensive ongoing public engagement process has included preparing and administering an online public attitudinal survey; an interactive map for geographically identifying issues and opportunities; holding working sessions with the Town’s Planning Department, Town Board, and a Town- appointed Citizens Advisory Committee; and holding a series of hybrid (in-person and virtual) hamlet-focused meetings, followed by a series of 5 hybrid topic-oriented meetings (covering: 1. Environment, Sustainability, and Renewable Energy; 2. Economic Background Education MS, Columbia University, Metallurgical Engineering and Chemical Metallurgy, 1986 BA, Willamette University, Chemistry (ACS Certified), Mathematics, and Physics, 1983 Universidad de Madrid,1978 Université de Nice,1978 Licenses/Certifications Intensive Transportation Seminars Years of Experience 37 years in the industry 37 years with AKRF Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold06 Development in the Downtown and Route 58; 3. Housing and Community Services; 4. Transportation and Utilities/ Infrastructure; and 5. Agriculture and Farmland and Historic Resources Preservation) to better understand the priorities and desires of the Town’s residents, business community and other stakeholders. AKRF is also developing zoning and other implementable recommendations to include in the updated Comprehensive Plan. AKRF developed content for and manages the Project Website devoted to the Comprehensive Plan Update that is updated continuously as the project advances, and includes announcements, meeting agendas, presentations, and results of analyses and summaries of feedback received at the various public meetings. At the culmination of this ongoing work, AKRF will prepare a GEIS to facilitate implementation of the updated Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Holley has been involved with various aspects of the project, including directing the Public Outreach/Public Engagement aspects of the project. Town of Southold, SEQRA Review of Southold Comprehensive Plan, Southold, NY AKRF assisted the Town of Southold Planning Department with performing review of their Comprehensive Plan Update pursuant to SEQRA. AKRF evaluated the goals and recom- mendations of the update in the context of the Town's existing and anticipated future conditions and resources to determine the potential for any impacts. In accordance with SEQRA, AKRF completed the EAF Parts 1, 2, and 3 on behalf of the Town of Southold Planning and Town Boards, working closely with the Town's Planning Department. AKRF analyzed potential impacts for a range of technical areas including agricultural, aesthetic, cultural, transportation, and socioeconomic resources. Mr. Holley served as Principal-in-Charge for this effort, overseeing AKRF staff and providing input and QA/QC review of work products. Town of Southold, Southold Comprehensive Plan Transportation and Infrastructure Chapter, Southold, NY AKRF was responsible for the preparation of the draft compre- hensive plan transportation and infrastructure chapter for the Town of Southold. Mr. Holley served as a project advisor on this effort, overseeing AKRF”s staff and providing input and QA/ QC review of work products. AKRF’s responsibilities included the management of GIS data collection, analysis, and mapping, overseeing the preparation of the chapter, and presenting the chapter to the Planning Board, Transportation Committee, and Town Board. AKRF staff also attended public outreach events to present the draft chapter and engage the public to gather input to further refine these sections of the Town’s Comprehensive Plan. Town of Southold, Southold Comprehensive Plan Graphic Design, Town of Southold, NY AKRF formatted and organized the comprehensive plan indi- vidual chapters created by the Town Planning Department. AKRF managed the preparation of graphics and text, and Town deadlines. AKRF ensured that the ambitious deadlines were successfully met. Mr. Holley served as Principal-in- Charge for this effort, overseeing AKRF”s staff and providing input and QA/QC review of work products., including the production of GIS maps, infographics, and formatting of tables related to the Transportation and Infrastructure chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. AKRF had previously led the preparation of that chapter in the Comprehensive Plan. Gas Station SEQRA Review, Town of Southold, NY AKRF assisted the Town of Southold with the SEQRA review of Site Plan Application for a proposed Gas station and Convenience Store at the corner of Youngs Avenue and Route 48 (where the Tidy Car Camper business is now located), in the hamlet of Southold. AKRF will provide review and comment on the Site Pan Application, and help the Town decide on the appropriate SEQRA determination. Mr. Holley served as Principal-in-Charge for this effort, overseeing AKRF staff. Town of North Hempstead NY, New Cassel Step 2 BOA, North Hempstead, NY As part of the nomination for the proposed Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA) under Step 2 of the State of New York’s Brownfield Opportunity Areas Program (i.e. BOA Program), AKRF completed a hazardous materials assessment to address the potential for the presence of contamination resulting from previous or existing uses in the proposed New Cassel Brownfield BOA, which comprised approximately 500 acres with nearly 3,000 tax lots, including approximately 50 potential brownfield sites (including vacant, abandoned, underutilized, and potentially contaminated properties). Stephen Holley was the Principal, and led the site inventory and analysis, economic and market trend research, public outreach, which included participation by both the civic and business community, and an environmental assessment of the area’s brownfields and other vacant, abandoned, and underutilized sites, along with recommended redevelop- ment strategies for the strategic sites. He provided oversight and quality control for the analyses and written materials. Stephen Holley Senior Vice President / Role: Principal-in-Charge 07Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold Stephen also led AKRF’s piece of the public outreach effort, which involved soliciting community input and feedback to be used to update the hamlet Vision Plan, resulting in “An Expression of New Cassel, Advancing the New Cassel Community Vision.” His community involvement and outreach work also included developing meeting materials and presentations, conducting meetings and preparing outreach materials in both English and Spanish. The Step 2 Nomination Report has been accepted as complete by the NYSDOS, which oversees the BOA program; the BOA was officially designated by NYSDOS. Town of Riverhead NY, East Main Street Urban Renewal Plan and GEIS, Riverhead, NY As part of their efforts to improve the downtown waterfront, the Town of Riverhead retained AKRF to prepare an Urban Renewal Plan for the East Main Street Urban Renewal Area (EMSURA) and subsequent GEIS. This updated plan assessed such issues as blight, substandard conditions, land use, transportation, and community services such as solid waste management and included more than 70 recommendations pertaining to each of these issues. Mr. Holley served as Principal-in-Charge for this effort, overseeing AKRF staff and providing input and QA/QC review of work products. East Farmingdale Form-Based Code SEQRA Review, Town Of Babylon, NY AKRF was retained by the Town of Babylon to prepare a GEIS for the proposed Form Based Code (FBC) developed for the hamlet of East Farmingdale. The FBC is part of a larger effort by the Town to improve and revi talize the Route 110 Corridor through implementation of Bus Rapid Transit and mixed-use Transit-Oriented Development. The hamlet is centered on the soon to be re-opened Long Island Railroad Station and will become a critical link in both north-south and east-west transit on Long Island. Mr. Holley served as Principal-in- Charge for this effort, which began by working with the FBC design team to understand the Plan’s goals as well as its potential practical impacts, including the potential build-out of the new zoning. The GEIS addressed potential impacts to the traffic and transportation system, sewer and water systems as well as the needed remediation of site-specific environmental contamination. AKRF had previously prepared due diligence reports on the East Farmingdale area in prepa- ration for the development of the FBC. Mr. Holley served as Principal-in-Charge for this effort, overseeing AKRF staff and providing input and QA/QC review of work products. Suffolk County 2035 Comprehensive Master Plan, Suffolk County, NY Mr. Holley served as the Principal-in-Charge for AKRF’s work to prepare the Suffolk County Comprehensive Master Plan 2035 (SCCMP 2035) and companion executive summary document for the Suffolk County Department of Planning and Economic Development. The plan addressed a wide range of issues affecting Suffolk County residents; changing demographics, shifting patterns for economic development; transportation challenges; environmental concerns regarding agricultural land and water resources; and quality of life issues. One of the most effective means of addressing the wide variety of issues facing Suffolk County today, and well into the future, will be to develop the sustainable “Smart Growth” strategies outlined in the comprehensive master plan. These strategies will be essential to creating a vibrant and sustainable future for Suffolk County. This is the first new comprehensive plan for Suffolk County to be formally adopted by the County Legislature in over 40 years. The Framework for the Future Suffolk County Comprehensive Master Plan 2035 was formally adopted in July 2015. Village of Hempstead NY, Village of Hempstead Brownfield Opportunity Area Step 2, Hempstead, NY The Community Development Agency (CDA) of the Village of Hempstead has engaged AKRF to lead the BOA Step 2 study for the downtown area. The Village faces a number of challenges, including a shortage in housing, a high share of undocumented immigrants, and a large portion of low- income households. However, it also offers many assets, such as exceptional access to the Long Island Rail Road, an inter- modal transfer facility that provides a connection between the county’s bus lines and the regional rail network, and vacant and underutilized parcels, suitable for redevelopment. As Principal, Stephen Holley was responsible for the site inventory and analysis, economic and market trend research, public outreach, which included participation by members of the public, as well as representatives of the civic and business community, and an environmental assessment of the area’s brownfields and other vacant, abandoned, and underutilized sites, along with recommended redevelopment strategies for the strategic sites. He provided oversight and quality control for the analyses and written materials. Stephen conducted the intensive outreach process, that involved identifying stakeholders, forming stakeholder and Citizen advisory Stephen Holley Senior Vice President / Role: Principal-in-Charge Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold08 groups, conducting regular meetings with these groups, and holding Village or Town-wide public information sessions and visioning exercises. Based on the success of the Step 2 Nomination, the Village was awarded additional funding in 2021 from NYSDOS for implementation studies and activities. BOA Program Services for the Town of Babylon, Wyandanch, NY Mr. Holley served as the Principal-in-Charge for this project, providing oversight and quality control for the analyses and written materials. A significant portion of the project involved public outreach and public involvement, with AKRF attending meetings to provide technical support and information to the public. AKRF was responsible for coordinating all aspects of the BOA Grant consulting services and technical assistance for the Wyandanch downtown revitalization initiative. We helped streamline the environmental and public review processes related to the BOA Program, Urban Renewal Law, and SEQRA. AKRF also packaged all of the required documentation as the Wyandanch Downtown Revitalization Plan, which included preparation of blight and market studies, a BOA Step 2 Nomination, an Urban Renewal Plan, a Generic EIS, and recom- mendations for changes to the Town’s current zoning code and preliminary site layouts with design standards. Town of Babylon NY, Wyandanch BOA Step 3 AKRF assisted the town on this large-scale area-wide plan- ning project. A significant portion of the project involved public outreach and public involvement, with AKRF attending meetings to provide technical support and information to the public. AKRF was responsible for coordinating all aspects of the BOA Grant consulting services and technical assistance for the Wyandanch downtown revitalization initiative. We helped streamline the environmental and public review processes related to the BOA Program, Urban Renewal Law, and SEQRA. AKRF packaged all of the required documenta- tion as the Wyandanch Downtown Revitalization Plan. The project involved the preparation of blight and market studies, a BOA Step 2 Nomination, an Urban Renewal Plan, and a GEIS. AKRF assisted with the preparation of the BOA Designation documentation, and the Wyandanch BOA was officially designated by NYSDOS. Development resulting from this planning work is underway, with the new Intermodal parking facility, new LIRR station, and several private development buildings completed and now occupied. As Principal, Stephen Holley provided oversight and quality control for the analyses and written materials NYCDDC EIS and Feasibility and Pre-Scoping Services for East Side Coastal Resiliency, New York, NY Stephen Holley coordinated the project’s community outreach efforts serving as the liaison for communications between the project engineers, city agencies, client team, and the project’s UD/CE team, and worked with the Community Board Joint Waterfront Task Force to identify appropriate dates for each of engagement meetings. For these meetings, he developed the concepts for the advertising materials, and assisted with prep- ping the presentation materials for review and approval by the city team. All materials developed for these meetings were translated into English, Spanish, and Chinese, and interpreter services were provided at each of the meetings based on the demographics of the individuals attending the meetings. In addition, Stephen prepared and issued a request for proposals to solicit local outreach assistance from Community-based organizations, coordinating and integrating their efforts with the UD/CE team. He also coordinated the creation of the interactive DOITT website that went live in October 2015. The website provides information to stakeholders about the project and its progress, and served as a means by which the City receives comments on the project design and environmental review materials from the public. New York Metropolitan Transportation Council, Long Island Sustainable East End Development Study (SEEDS), Suffolk County, NY AKRF served as the lead consultant for SEEDS, a New York Metropolitan Transportation Council sponsored, consensus- driven initiative. SEEDS supported a sustainable development approach in response to the East End of Long Island’s transpor- tation and land use concerns, for which public participation was integral. AKRF helped build consensus among the five towns and nine villages of the East End by coordinating an unprecedented public outreach effort involving “bottom-up” community participation. Stephen Holley served as Public Outreach Facilitator/Translator for SEEDS. AKRF facilitated a series of visioning sessions, regional planning workshops, and community stakeholder meetings, and Stephen led the portion of the public outreach effort conducted in Spanish. This effort involved the management and translation in Spanish of a series of 6 charrettes conducted in towns throughout the East End. He directly interacted with a variety of stakeholders, including elected officials and other interested parties in the region. Stephen also translated the project infor- mation package, summarizing the purpose of the study and desired outcomes of the charrette activities for distribution to the Spanish-speaking public. Stephen Holley Senior Vice President / Principal-in-Charge Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold 09 Robert White, AICP, PP Senior Vice President / Role: Project Advisor Robert M. White, AICP, PP is a Senior Vice President of the firm with experience in Robert M. White, a Senior Vice President of the firm, has over two decades of experi- ence in the management of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs), environmental permitting, infrastructure and ecological studies, and zoning and master planning analyses, particularly as they relate to waterfront and coastal management projects. Mr. White has been involved in numerous projects throughout the New York metropolitan region, specifically in the five boroughs of New York City, northern and central New Jersey, and Nassau and Suffolk Counties. Relevant Experience Village of Greenport Harbor Management Plan, Greenport, NY This historic maritime community on the North Fork of Eastern Long Island was looking to preserve, and expand on its existing maritime heritage and infrastructure through the development of a Harbor Management Plan. As Project Manager, Mr. White performed an extensive inventory of the Village Harbor facilities, evaluated the operational considerations of the harbor, looking at options for reducing wake waves, increasing mooring opportunities, and examining the opportunities for a new marina and pier access. In addition, he ensured that the plan met the requirements of the NYS Dept. of State with respect to managing the open water area. Ultimately, the Village adopted the plan as an amendment to its Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and implemented a number of strategies, including No Wake Zones and alternate mooring arrangements, and is now moving forward with plans for a new pier and marina. Long Island South Shore Estuary Reserve Project, Long Island, NY Mr. White was the Project Manager for the analysis of cultural and historic resources in the reserve. Mr. White’s team of historians and planners inventoried the cultural resources that link the past and current uses of the estuary and conducted an evalua- tion of landmarked historic resources at every level of jurisdiction. A number of poli- cies were developed that were then integrated into the New York State Department of State’s South Shore Estuary Reserve Plan, which was adopted in April 2001. Studies for the South Shore Estuary Reserve (SSER), Long Island, NY The SSER encompasses the south shore bays and their watersheds. It extends for 80 miles from the western boundary of the Town of Hempstead in Nassau County to Shinnecock Bay and the Village of Southampton in Suffolk County. Mr. White prepared three studies for the recently published Long Island South Shore Estuary Reserve Draft Comprehensive Management Plan prepared by the New York State Department of State: an Open Space Preservation Study, a Cultural Resources Study, and a Regulatory Framework Study. That analysis identified nearly 60 sites containing approximately 4,000 acres. The Cultural Resources Study was undertaken to identify the cultural features of the SSER, particularly with respect to the fishing and recreational history. Recommendations were made with respect to initiatives that would protect and enhance historic maritime and cultural features of the SSER and how that protection could benefit estuary-based tourism. Ten historic maritime centers were identified as part of that effort. The regulatory framework analysis focused on techniques for Background Education Certificate, New York University, Business Management, 1993 BA, Rutgers University, Urban Studies/City Planning, 1982 Licenses/Certifications Certified Planner, American Licensed Professional Planner, NJ - 33LI00517300 Certified Planner, American Institute of Certified Planners Professional Memberships Member, American Planning Association, Committee Chair, New York Metro Chapter Environmental Committee, American Planning Association Member, New York Water and Environment Association Member, National Trust for Historic Preservation Years of Experience 40 years in the industry 35 years with AKRF Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold10 improving regulatory management in the SSER. Mr. White was the Project Manager for each of these studies. Hunters Point Mixed Use Zoning, Queens, NY The firm assisted DCP in preparing an EAS for this mixed use in the Hunters Point, Queens. The two areas of analysis for AKRF were air quality and noise. These analyses examined the impact of both ambient noise from sources such as the Long Island Expressway and local industrial sources with the poten- tial to impact residential uses. The result of the analyses was that a number of (E) designations were applied to properties to avoid impacts from ambient noise and local air emissions. Mr. White served as Project Manager for this project. MTA Long Island Rail Road’s East Side Access Project, New York, NY Mr. White led the evaluation of 10 potential rail yard sites on Long Island for the Long Island Rail Road’s East Side Access project. Each site was evaluated for its potential impact on natural features, including upland and wetland ecology. Among the issues were the potential impacts on terrestrial habitats and coastal zone conditions, including the drainage basin for the Great River in Brookhaven. NYPA Site Selection and Installation of 11 Turbine Generators, New York City and Long Island, NY The firm was retained by NYPA to assist in the SEQRA review of the proposed siting, construction, and operation of 11 new single-cycle gas turbine generators. Mr. White coordinated a comprehensive range of impact analyses for each of the 11 sites. For each site, an environmental assessment was prepared, accompanied by analyses of potential impacts on land use and zoning, visual character, historic and natural resources with an assessment of the project’s conformance with the DEC tidal wetlands regulations, and air quality analyses necessary for a permit. In addition, the firm reviewed the proposed project’s conformance with the City’s Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Town of Southampton Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Code Revisions and Generic EIS (GEIS), Southampton, NY Mr. White was the Project Manager for an analysis to determine which sections of the Town code needed to be updated and amended in order to manage the 14 miles of the Town’s Atlantic Ocean shoreline. A number of alternatives were evaluated for the environmental review process. These alternatives, in addition to a No Action Alternative, addressed a full range of environmental conditions, but focused on shoreline erosion impacts, natural resources of the coastline, public access, visual character, and economic and fiscal considerations. In Spring 2003, the Town adopted a local ordinance based on the results of that study. Village of Freeport Seabreeze Waterfront Park Alternatives Analysis, Freeport, NY Mr. White was the Project Manager for an alternatives analysis for the development of a 4-acre parcel of land known as Seabreeze Park, on the south shore of the community. The Village’s goal is to develop a re-use plan that will maintain the quality of life for its residents while enhancing the maritime character of its waterfront area, provide waterfront open space and public access, and promote economic redevelopment. Planning for the project included a public outreach plan, as well as coordination with a Technical Advisory Committee composed of local and state agencies. Currently, the firm is securing State and Federal permits for implementing Phase I of the plan, which includes bulkhead improvements, as well as a new marina and creation of an inter-modal marsh. Long Island Power Authority (LIPA) Wind Turbine Demonstration Project, Suffolk County, NY Mr. White was the land use technical director for this environmental assessment, which involved siting five wind- powered turbines on agricultural parcels in the Towns of Brookhaven, Riverhead, and Southold. The purpose of the project was to demonstrate both the feasibility of wind turbines for power generation and the expansion of green sources of energy on Long Island. LIPA Temporary Mobile Emergency Generator Project Environmental Assessment, Suffolk County, NY Mr. White was the land use technical director of this environmental assessment, which involved siting 10 mobile turbine generator units at three sites in Suffolk County to meet anticipated peak power demands during the summer of 2002. Site Specific Environmental Review for the Long Beach Superblock Project (Beach Hotel and Residences), Long Beach, NY Mr. White served as the Project Manager for this environmental review, which examined the conformance of a proposed mixed-use development project with a previously completed SEQRA analysis for the planned redevelopment of the Superblock, a 6-acre Urban Renewal property located along the Long Beach waterfront. Robert White, AICP, PP Senior Vice President / Role: Project Advisor 11Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold Lockheed Martin Reuse Plan, Long Island, NY Mr. White was the Project Manager for the environmental review of a former Lockheed Martin Corporation facility for which the company, through its real estate subsidiary LMC Properties, Inc., developed a reuse plan. The property is 93 acres, 50 of which are located in the Town of North Hempstead, and 43 in the Village of Lake Success, NY. Key issues were land use compatibility, fiscal and economic benefits, groundwater and traffic impacts. Southampton Draft Critical Wildlands & Groundwater Protection Plan and GEIS, Southampton, NY Mr. White is the Project Manager for the preparation of a comprehensive plan for growth management, groundwater protection and natural features preservation in the Town of Southampton, where significant increases in development threaten to cumulatively impact valuable floral and faunal habitats, the quality of potable groundwater, and open space objectives. Grumman Reuse Plan, Bethpage, NY As environmental task leader, Mr. White worked with a team of engineers and real estate analysts in developing a reuse plan for this former aerospace manufacturing plant. The Mall at Oyster Bay, Oyster Bay, NY Mr. White led a number of technical analyses, including the groundwater and land use studies, for this plan to redevelop a 38.9-acre vacant industrial site in the Town of Oyster Bay, Nassau County. Proposed is a 960,000-sf, enclosed, regional shopping center anchored by three upscale fashion department stores. Peconic Estuary Program, Suffolk County, NY Mr. White was the Project Manager of this analysis that sought to identify a correlation between water quality and land uses in the Peconic Estuary watershed. Ten creeks that feed the Peconic were evaluated for land use and bulkhead conditions. Culloden Point Subdivision and Open Space Plan, Montauk, NY Mr. White was the Project Manager for the EIS prepared for a proposed 250-acre residential sub-division of this located on the coast of Block Island Sound in a largely rural area. Key issues included the project cluster plan and open space pres- ervation proposals, runoff and the potential for impacts on surface waters and the site's 32 acres of wetlands, impacts of septic systems on groundwater, and the potential for impacts on wildlife, including a number of endangered species. The plan was approved in Spring 1994 and the EIS served as a model for the Town of East Hampton. Hebrew Academy of Long Beach Yeshiva, Lawrence, NY Mr. White was the Project Manager for environmental and planning services provided to the Hebrew Academy of Long Beach in their efforts to construct a new Orthodox Jewish high school for boys in grades 9 through 12 in the Village of Lawrence. Key issues were land use compatibility, traffic and natural resources protection. Heartland Business Center, Islip, NY Mr. White was the Project Manager for the EIS for a 2-million- sf expansion of the Heartland Business Center in Islip. Key issues in this analysis were clearing and development within the Oak Brush Plains Special Groundwater Protection Area, traffic impacts on local and county roads as well as the Sagtikos Parkway, and land use compatibility with the adja- cent Edgewood State Preserve, a DEC-managed open space. Calverton Naval Weapons Station, Riverhead, NY Mr. White was the environmental task leader for a team working under the Town of Riverhead Community Development Agency and the Calverton Air Facility Joint Planning and Reuse Commission. The team developed a reuse plan for this 3,000-acre site, which was due to be conveyed to the CDA. The environmental planning services included strategies that structured the reuse plan within the framework of local, regional, and state environmental regula- tions. Major issues were the policies, programs, and standards of the Central Pine Barrens Comprehensive Land Use Plan, particularly with respect to the preservation core area and compatible growth area designated on the site; wastewater generation and discharge to a sole source aquifer and regional drinking water supply; and surface, marine water, and natural resources protection issues, including protection of the Peconic River Watershed. Town of Southold Harbor Management and Erosion Control Plan, Southold, NY Mr. White led the preparation of a harbor management plan that provided a comprehensive inventory and management strategy for the Town's harbor waters and adjacent upland. The plan addressed a variety of factors: marina activity, shoreline dynamics and erosion, use of the water, natural resources protection, water quality, wetlands and stormwater runoff, and dredging. The plan was to be integrated into the Town's overall Robert White, AICP, PP Senior Vice President / Role: Project Advisor Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold12 Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A focus of the plan was Mattituck Inlet, a major maritime center in the Town. Payton Lane Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center, Southampton, NY Mr. White was the Project Manager for the EIS for the proposed construction of a nursing home and a senior day care center. The facility was a new use on a vacant parcel located in a commercial zone, but required special permit approval from the Village Zoning Board of Appeals. Principal environmental issues included site design and visual character, community facilities, fiscal benefits for the local municipalities, traffic and transportation (including the potential for impacts on County Road 39), groundwater impacts, and wastewater treatment (the proposed on-site wastewater treatment system is upgradient from local groundwater supply wells). Village of Patchogue Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan (LWRP), Patchogue, NY Mr. White is the Principal-in-Charge for the Village LWRP. As such, Mr. White oversaw preparation of the LWRP and coordinated advisory committee meetings to address issues and opportunities important to the community and Village. East Quogue Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS), East Quogue, NY Mr. White served as Principal-in-Charge for the preparation of a GEIS that addressed a wide range of physical, natural, social, economic, fiscal, and regulatory issues. As such, he oversaw preparation of impact thresholds, impact matrices associated with the potential developments, and the GEIS chapters. Mr. White also attended community advisory and developer meetings and coordinated with Town staff and other involved agencies including the East Quogue School District. The GEIS was since approved. Robert White, AICP, PP Senior Vice President / Role: Project Advisor Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold 13 Lorianne DeFalco, AICP Senior Technical Director / Role: Project Manager Lorianne DeFalco is a Senior Technical Director in the firm’s Environmental Assessment & Planning Department with 20 years of experience in planning and economics. She has expertise in environmental impact analysis, including land use and zoning, socioeconomics, energy and climate change, and environmental justice. She is also proficient in market analysis, economic benefits modeling (IMPLAN), public outreach, and a variety of computer applications including Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Adobe Creative Cloud. Ms. DeFalco serves as Project Manager and Deputy Project Manager for a wide variety of projects, including environmental impact statements and environmental assessments, land use and urban renewal plans, and market and fiscal impact analyses. Relevant Experience Town of Southold NY, SEQRA Review of Southold Comp Plan, Southold, NY AKRF assisted the Town of Southold Planning Department with performing review of their Comprehensive Plan Update pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). AKRF evaluated the goals and recommendations of the update in the context of the Town's existing and anticipated future conditions and resources to determine the potential for any impacts. In accordance with SEQRA, AKRF completed the Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Parts 1, 2, and 3 on behalf of the Town of Southold Planning and Town Boards, working closely with the Town's Planning Department. AKRF analyzed potential impacts for a range of technical areas including agricultural, aesthetic, cultural, transportation, and socio - economic resources. Lorianne DeFalco served as Project Manager, coordinating and reviewing all aspects of the project internally and with the Planning Department. Town of Riverhead Comprehensive Plan Update, Riverhead, NY Ms. DeFalco is currently Project Manager for this Comprehensive Plan Update for the Town of Riverhead on Long Island, NY. As such, Ms. DeFalco regularly coordinates with the Planning Director, Central Advisory Committee, and other stakeholders to facilitate the project. She is leading an extensive public outreach strategy including interviews with Town Departments and key community stakeholders; an online public survey; project website; online mapping; advisory committee meetings; and virtual hamlet/community meetings. She is also overseeing preparation of an economic and market trends analysis to identify housing, retail, and other townwide and hamlet-based recommendations, and developing zoning recommendations such as updates to the Town’s Transfer of Development Rights program. NYS Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA) Program Nomination and Implementation Strategy for the Town of Babylon, Wyandanch, NY The Town of Babylon selected AKRF to provide NYS BOA Program consulting services as part of the Town’s “Wyandanch Rising” downtown revitalization initiative. As Project Manager, Ms. DeFalco led preparation of a blight study, market study, BOA Step 2 Nomination, Urban Renewal Plan, and a Generic Environmental Impact Background Education University of the Arts, Adobe Creative Cloud, 2015 MS, New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, Environmental Technology, 2006 BS, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Environmental Design, 2002 Licenses/Certifications LEED® Green Associate, US Green Building Council Certified Planner, American Institute of Certified Planners Professional Memberships Member, American Planning Member, American Planning Association, Committee Member, Urban Land Institute, Philadelphia Housing Local Product Council Board Advisor, American Planning Association, APA Pennsylvania Southeast Section Council Years of Experience 20 years in the industry 18 years with AKRF Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold14 Statement (GEIS), which together became the “Wyandanch Downtown Revitalization Plan.” Ms. DeFalco worked closely with the project architects to develop proposed zoning recommendations and conceptual land use plans for strategic sites. After successful completion of the Step 2, the Town received a Step 3 BOA grant aimed at implementation of the recommendations. Ms. DeFalco prepared the Step 3 Implementation Strategy and assisted the Town in achieving the first BOA designation in the state. Village of Hempstead Step 2 BOA Nomination, Hempstead, NY AKRF was selected by the Village of Hempstead Community Development Agency (CDA) to conduct a BOA Step 2 Nomination to spur the redevelopment and revitalization of downtown Hempstead. As Project Manager, Ms. DeFalco led preparation of the Nomination based on input obtained during a robust community engagement effort. She also directed production of a reader-friendly, graphic-oriented executive summary and a marketing brochure, designed to attract investors. In addition, Ms. DeFalco assisted the Village with preparing BOA Designation materials. The Village subsequently received its BOA Designation in April 2021. Flushing Willets Point Corona Local Development Corporation (LDC), Flushing Waterfront BOA Step 2 Nomination, Flushing, NY. As Project Manager, Lorianne DeFalco developed progress reports, maintained the project schedule, and coordinated with the project team, the LDC, and the New York State Department of State (NYSDOS). She provided input and guidance related to the BOA Program to the client and project team. She played a prominent role in developing the public outreach program and executing the community and stakeholder meetings. Lorianne also assisted with the market study. She was the primary author for the BOA Nomination/Master Plan and coordinated work by the design team and consultation with the New York City Department of City Planning (DCP) aimed at facilitating a rezoning and other land use actions to achieve the community’s desired redevelopment. County of Suffolk NY, Suffolk County 2035 Comprehensive Master Plan, Suffolk County, NY AKRF was retained by the Suffolk County Department of Planning and Economic Development to complete the Suffolk County Comprehensive Master Plan–2035 and companion executive summary document, to examine a broad range of issues facing the County now and into the future. Lorianne DeFalco responded to comments from the County on the draft plan. As such, she finalized the drafts related to land use, social conditions, housing, and the overall economy, aimed at preserving and enhancing the County’s unique agricultural, scenic, and economic assets. Town of Riverhead NY, East Main Street Urban Renewal Plan and Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS), Riverhead, NY As part of their efforts to improve the downtown waterfront, the Town of Riverhead retained AKRF to prepare an Urban Renewal Plan for the East Main Street Urban Renewal Area (EMSURA) and subsequent Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS). This updated plan assessed such issues as blight, substandard conditions, land use, transportation, and community services such as solid waste management and included more than 70 recommendations pertaining to each of these issues. Lorianne DeFalco was involved in the preparation of the Solid Waste; Air Quality; Cultural, Natural, and Water Resources chapters of the GEIS. Town of Southampton NY, East Quogue Generic Environmental Impact Statement, East Quogue, NY The Town of Southampton hired AKRF to develop a land use plan and impact threshold analysis for the hamlet of East Quogue. The firm prepared a Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) addressing a wide range of physical, natural, social, economic, fiscal, and regulatory issues. The project included an extensive program of community and developer meetings to identify issues and build consensus, including close coordination with the Town and involved agencies As part of this effort, Lorianne DeFalco drafted various existing conditions assessments for inclusion in the GEIS. Lorianne DeFalco, AICP Senior Technical Director / Role: Project Manager Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold 15 Matthew Carmody, PE, RSP1 Vice President / Role: Traffic and Transportation Lead Matthew T. Carmody, PE, RSP1 is a Vice President with experience in the manage- ment and performance of transportation engineering and planning services. He has worked on numerous transportation studies, environmental assessments and impact statements, master and comprehensive plans, corridor studies, and design projects throughout New York City, Long Island, and Upstate, and his widespread experience includes traffic, pedestrians, bicycles, transit, and parking. Matthew specializes in transportation safety and traffic calming, and he has conducted crash analysis and mitigation studies for vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles, participated in the development of road safety audit guidelines, and managed Safe Routes to School engineering studies. He has provided transportation engineering support on street Complete Street design projects. Relevant Experience Town of Southold, SEQRA Review of Southold Comprehensive Plan, Southold, NY AKRF assisted the Town of Southold Planning Department with performing review of their Comprehensive Plan Update pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). AKRF evaluated the goals and recommendations of the update in the context of the Town's existing and anticipated future conditions and resources to determine the potential for any impacts. In accordance with SEQRA, AKRF completed the Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Parts 1, 2, and 3 on behalf of the Town of Southold Planning and Town Boards, working closely with the Town's Planning Department. AKRF analyzed potential impacts for a range of technical areas including agricultural, aesthetic, cultural, transportation, and socio - economic resources. Mr. Carmody participated in the environmental review of the transportation component of the Comprehensive Plan. Town of Southold, Southold Comprehensive Plan Transportation and Infrastructure Chapter, Southold, NY As Project Manager, Matthew Carmody was responsible for the preparation of the draft comprehensive plan transportation and infrastructure chapter for the Town of Southold. Matthew's responsibilities included the management of GIS data collection, analysis, and mapping, overseeing the preparation of the chapter, and presenting the chapter to the Planning Board, Transportation Committee, and Town Board. He also attended public outreach events to present the draft chapter and engage the public to gather input. Town of Southold, Southold Comprehensive Plan Graphic Design, Town of Southold, NY AKRF formatted and organized the comprehensive plan individual chapters created by the Town Planning Department. Matt Carmody managed graphics and editorial staff availability, deadlines, and budget on this project. He ensured that the ambi- tious deadlines were met, which they were successfully. In addition, he oversaw staff on the production of GIS maps, infographics, and formatted tables related to the Transportation and Infrastructure chapter. Matt had previously led the preparation of that chapter in the Comprehensive Plan. Background Education BS, Clemson University, Civil Engineering, 1998 Licenses/Certifications Professional Engineer, NY - 081939 Road Safety Professional 1, Transportation Professional Certification Board Professional Memberships Member, Institute of Transportation Engineers Member, American Society of Civil Engineers Member, American Society of Highway Engineers Member, New York City Chapter Infrastructure Council, Urban Land Institute Years of Experience 24 years in the industry 7 years with AKRF Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold16 Town of Southold, Love Lane Safety and Traffic Engineering Study, Southold, NY Matthew Carmody was the Project Manager for a safety and mobility study in the Hamlet of Mattituck. He oversaw the project on behalf of the Town Engineering Department, and presented various improvement concepts to the Suffolk County Department of Public Works and New York State Department of Transportation. Matthew led the tabulation of crash/safety studies, traffic counts, development of Complete Streets intersection and corridor improvements, analysis of a roundabout and signalized intersection alternatives, and coordination meetings with the Town. He also presented the project alternatives at a public meeting to gather input. Town of Southold, New Suffolk Parking Study, Southold, NY AKRF was responsible for a parking and traffic circulation study of New Suffolk Hamlet Center for the Town of Southold Engineering Department. Matt Carmody scoped the project and was the point of contact with the Town. He assisted with reviewing the draft report and refining the recommendations, and presented project alternatives at a public meeting to gather input. Town of Clarkstown NY, Traffic Consultant, Clarkstown, NY AKRF is providing transportation planning, traffic engineering, and public outreach services to the Town of Clarkstown in support of its Complete Streets Policy. As the Town Traffic Consultant, AKRF’s responsibilities include performing trans- portation studies on behalf of the Town Planning Department, and reviewing site plans and environmental assessments from a traffic standpoint to ensure that capacity analyses, parking, site access and egress, and internal site circulation issues are adequately and correctly addressed in reports that are submitted to the Town. Matthew Carmody, as Project Manager, assisted the Town of Clarkstown with Complete Streets transportation studies and training. Matthew drafted a guide for the Complete Streets Committee to use for project selection and complete streets improvements such as pedestrian safety treatments, traffic calming, and walking and biking improvements. He has conducted Complete Streets studies for the Town which have addressed speeding and walkability issues. Matthew conducted a training course for the volunteer members of the Complete Streets Committee on how to use the Town of Clarkstown Complete Streets guide, conduct field assessments to identify safety and mobility issues and opportunities, and select and document complete street projects. Village of Mamaroneck Transportation Engineering On- Call, Mamaroneck, NY AKRF is contracted by the Village of Mamaroneck to provide on-call transportation planning and engineering services to the Village. AKRF’s role is to field requests from the Mayor, Village Manager’s Office, Engineer, Planner, and Traffic Board to conduct safety, traffic calming, school safety, and Complete Street studies in support of the Village’s Safe Street initiative and Vision Zero policy, and review private applicant traffic and parking studies and provide testimony to Village Trustee, Planning and Zoning Board of Appeals as needed. Matthew Carmody is the Project Manager for the contract. His responsibilities include coordinating tasks with the Mayor, Village Manager, Assistant Village Manager, Village Engineer, and Village Planner, and scoping out transportation planning and traffic engineering studies to support Village initiatives to improve walkability, safety, and biking near schools and in dense residen- tial neighborhoods. Matthew appeared on the Mayor’s television program the “Tom Murphy Show” to discuss the importance of pedestrian safety on the Village’s streets. He has led such diverse efforts as a study to reduce cut through and speeding traffic in a neighborhood near Rye Neck High School, developing a list of pedestrian safety improvements for the large elementary school called the Mamaroneck Avenue School in the downtown and estimating the costs so the Village could apply for a Community Block Development Grant, participated in walkability assessment tours, provided safety recommendations to reduce speeding on streets in the Washingtonville neighborhood, and coordinated with the Westchester County Department of Transportation and Public Works on a school crosswalk at a County-maintained traffic signal. Town of Smithtown NY, Smithtown Comprehensive Plan & SEQRA, Smithtown, NY Matthew Carmody is a Task Leader responsible for developing the hamlet transportation plans and hamlet sidewalk and safety plans. Matthew managed the development of GIS maps inventorying multimodal transportation networks including surface, rail and waterborne transportation, crash and safety analyses, and recommendations for improvements that have synergies with the land use planning and economic develop- ment strategies. The Comprehensive Plan was finalized and is currently undergoing environmental review under SEQRA. Matthew is responsible for leading the traffic and transporta- tion studies and drafting the Transportation and Parking Chapters in the Draft GEIS. Matthew Carmody, PE, RSP1 Vice President / Role: Traffic and Transportation Lead Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold 17 ASHLEY A. LEY, AICP Vice President / Zoning Analyst As leader of the Connecticut and Hudson Valley municipal planning practice, Ashley Ley, AICP, brings deep knowledge and experience to writing zoning text, reviewing site plans, and conducting environmental analyses for land development projects. Ashley’s municipal land use planning and zoning experience includes the preparation of special area plans; comprehensive plans; zoning text, map, and code amendments; visual impact assessments; urban design standards; and sign regulations. She currently serves as a planning consultant for several municipalities in the Hudson Valley region. Her expertise also encompasses the preparation of environmental reviews under federal and state guidelines for public actions, private development projects, CDBG-Disaster Recovery, and large transportation and infrastructure projects. Relevant Experience Salisbury Zoning Revisions, Salisbury, CT AKRF was retained by the Town of Salisbury, CT to recommend a zoning amend- ments to guide development of multifamily housing consistent with the Town’s Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD). Salisbury’s residential Zoning Regulations focused on single- family homes. AKRF worked with the Planning and Zoning Commission to identify zoning tools and prepared text and map amendments that would allow multifamily housing in certain districts, while maintaining community character and natural resources. AKRF met with the members of the Planning and Zoning Commission and stakeholder groups, and conducted several public engage- ment meetings. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously in favor of the zoning code amendments, which were adopted in September 2019. Ms. Ley served as Project Manager. Comprehensive Plan, Orangetown , NY AKRF was retained by the Town of Orangetown to update its Comprehensive Plan to establish a guiding framework for future sustainable development, economic growth, and natural resource preservation in the Town. AKRF, with its subconsultant MUD Workshop, facilitated on online survey and led a series of public workshops to gather community feedback. Through this public engagement process, AKRF prepared the and vetted the vision and goals for the Comprehensive Plan. AKRF is currently working with the Comprehensive Plan Committee (CPC) to refine imple- mentation strategies, develop zoning recommendations, and to prepare the final Comprehensive Plan document. Ultimately, the Comprehensive Plan will reflect the goals and recommendations of the Orangetown community and will serve as a blueprint for the Town’s growth and development in the coming years. Ms. Ley is serving as Project Manager. On-Call Planning Services, Southeast, NY Since 2007, Ms. Ley has served as a planner for the Town of Southeast where she provides ongoing site planning, design, and environmental review services for the Town, Planning, and Architectural Review Boards, as well as the Historic Sites Commission. Ms. Ley has worked with the Town to update its zoning regulations, Background Education Certificate in Landscape Design, New York Botanical Garden Certified Planner, American Institute of Certified Planners Professional Memberships Member, American Institute of Certified Planners Member, American Planning Association Co-Chair, Urban Land Institute Westchester/Fairfield Women's Leadership Initiative Committee Director-at-Large, Westchester Municipal Planning Federation Years of Experience 17 years in the industry 16 years with AKRF Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold18 architectural review regulations, design guidelines, local environmental regulations (stormwater management and wetlands), and the development review process. In 2014, Ms. Ley facilitated the update of the Town’s Comprehensive Plan, which AKRF prepared in 2002. Ms. Ley worked with the Town Board to implement the recommendations of Comprehensive Plan through the adoption of new zoning regulations. In 2021 Ms. Ley is worked with the Planning Board to update the Special Area Plan and zoning for Route 22, which AKRF prepared in 2006. In addition, Ms. Ley recently facilitated the Planning Board’s State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) review of a nearly 1 million square foot logistics center and is presently facilitating the review of a regional baseball training and competition facility. Planning Services, Amenia, NY In 2006, AKRF was retained by the Town to assist with completion of their Comprehensive Plan update, and new Zoning Law and Zoning Map. As part of that project, AKRF completed various technical components of the Comprehensive Plan, such as: an update to the conditions and trends; the potential effects of build-out under existing zoning; and the proposed hamlet-center zoning. The trends analysis included demographic, housing, natural resources, historic resources, infrastructure, and other technical analyses. AKRF also conducted the New York State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) of the Comprehensive Plan update, and new Zoning Law and Map. To keep the Town Board on its anticipated schedule, AKRF oversaw the successful completion of an expanded Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) and thorough Negative Declaration, instead a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Ms. Ley served as Deputy Project Manager and ensured that the project was successfully completed. In 2021 the Town retained AKRF to review the affordable housing provisions in the zoning code and comprehensive plan. Ms. Ley reviewed the relevant documents and prepared a strategy for updating the regulations to achieve the Town’s affordable housing goals. Zoning Code Revisions, Irvington, NY AKRF was retained by the Village of Irvington to prepare zoning text and map amendments for the Broadway Corridor. The Village desired a zoning toolbox to guide development of the Broadway Corridor north of Strawberry Lane in a manner consistent with the recently updated Comprehensive Plan. AKRF is worked with the Village to develop zoning that promotes the clustering of development setback from the public right-of-way to preserve the large lawns and open space fronting Broadway. The zoning was adopted in 2021. Ms. Ley served as Project Manager. Compo Beach Master Plan, Westport, CT AKRF, Inc., and Lothrop Associates, LLP, was retained by the Town of Westport Compo Beach Site Improvement Committee to prepare a Master Plan for the town’s premiere waterfront park. Compo Beach is a 29-acre waterfront recreation area that includes a swimming beach, marina, boat launches, barbeque areas, sports facilities, bathhouse, and playground. The project objectives included: improving the traffic flow at the beach entrance and circulation throughout the park; evaluating pedestrian safety improvements to Compo Beach Road and Soundview Drive; creating pedes- trian pathways and biking loops within the park; evaluating the condition and usage of existing facilities with the park, and the feasibility of constructing new facilities or relocating existing facilities; recommending landscape improvements including lawns, trees, ornamental areas and site lighting; and review and evaluate potential flood impact and protec- tion. Ms. Ley led the master planning and public engage- ment process. Brookfield Commons, White Plains, NY AKRF, Inc. was retained by Trinity Financial to provide New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), environmental, geotechnical engineering, and civil engineering services for the development of Brookfield Commons “Phase 2.” Brookfield Commons is the redevelopment of the 9.3 acre Winbrook Housing Projects in downtown White Plains, NY into a mixed-income residential community that will create 360 high-quality replacement housing units while physically and socially reconnecting this neighborhood into the larger White Plains community. Phase 2 involves the construction of a 9-story 139-unit multi-family residential building that will replace the currently vacant 135 South Lexington building, which was part of the Winbrook Housing Projects. The project is currently under construction. Ms. Ley served as Project Manager and led the preparation of the SEQRA and NEPA documentation. ASHLEY A. LEY, AICP Vice President / Zoning Analyst Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold 19 AARON WERNER, AICP Technical Director / Role: Planner Aaron Werner, AICP, is a Technical Director in AKRF’s Environmental Services Group. He has over 15 years of experience in preparing and critically reviewing various planning documents, Environmental Impact Statements, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments for real estate transactions, and Phase II subsurface investigations. He has successfully managed all aspects of pre- and post-development phases of project construction, with a primary focus on housing and mixed-use development. As a former Director of Environmental Planning at the NYC Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD), he was responsible for ensuring compliance with city, state and federal environmental requirements for New York City’s ambitious affordable housing pipeline. In addition to City and State Environmental Quality Review (CEQR/SEQRA), he has a thorough understanding of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) environmental standards and require - ments as they relate to both the rehabilitation and new construction of housing. Mr. Werner is proficient in ESRI ArcGIS , Microsoft Office Suite, and Adobe Acrobat/Adobe Photoshop. His experience includes the following key disciplines: urban/regional planning concepts, GIS analysis, affordable housing and community development policy, zoning, environmental sciences, historic preservation, civil engineering, archi- tecture, landscape architecture, site contamination and brownfield redevelopment. Relevant Experience On-Call Planning Services, Dover, NY AKRF has provided on-going planning services to the Town of Dover in support of the Planning Board and Town Board for more than 10 years. Services include preparing reviews on behalf of the Planning and Town Boards, of site plan and subdivision applications, special permit applications, zoning compliance, and SEQRA (environmental review) documents. AKRF has also worked with the Town to update its zoning regulations for camp uses and the development review process. In addi- tion, AKRF has provided environmental impact review services for several large-scale residential developments and energy infrastructure projects in the Town. Mr. Werner currently serves as the consulting planner for the Town of Dover Planning Board and provides on-going consulting services on the review of site plan and subdivi- sion applications, including compliance with the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), and master plan and zoning recommendations. Mr. Werner regularly attends all planning board meetings and is available to the Town to attend consultation meetings with Applicants or other municipal board meetings as requested. On-Call Planning Services, Philipstown, NY AKRF provided consulting services to the Planning Board in the Town of Philipstown. Services include preparing SEQRA reviews and recommendations for site plan and subdivision applications submitted to the Planning Board. AKRF also prepared and conducted Planning Board training to help familiarize the new members with site plan and subdivision application processes and the requirements of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). Mr. Werner currently serves as the Deputy Project Manager for provision of consulting services to the Town of Philipstown Background Education MA, State University of New York at Binghamton, Geography, 2005 BA, State University of New York at Binghamton, Environmental Studies (Environmental Planning), 2003 Licenses/Certifications Certified Planner, American Institute of Certified Planners Professional Memberships Member, American Planning Association Years of Experience 19 years in the industry 4 years with AKRF Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold20 Planning Board regarding special projects in the Town. Services include preparing reviews and recommendations for complying with the procedural requirements of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). On-Call Planning Services, Monroe, NY Mr. Werner currently serves as the Project Manager for provision of consulting services to the Town of Monroe Planning Board regarding special projects in the Town. Services include preparing reviews and recommendations for complying with the procedural requirements of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). Brookfield Commons, White Plains, NY AKRF, Inc. was retained by Trinity Financial to provide New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), environmental, geotechnical engineering, and civil engineering services for the development of Brookfield Commons “Phase 2.” Brookfield Commons is the redevelopment of the 9.3 acre Winbrook Housing Projects in downtown White Plains, NY into a mixed-income residential community that will create 360 high-quality replacement housing units while physically and socially reconnecting this neighborhood into the larger White Plains community. Phase 2 involves the construc- tion of a 9-story 139-unit multi-family residential building that will replace the currently vacant 135 South Lexington building, which was part of the Winbrook Housing Projects. The project is currently under construction. Aaron Werner assisted with the preparation of the HUD Part 58 EA and other documentation required by HUD, including public notices and the Request for Release of Funds (RROF) package. New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) PACT Brooklyn Bundle, Brooklyn, NY AKRF was retained by a consortium of housing developers to provide environmental consulting services in connec- tion with a joint application with NYCHA for conversion of assistance under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) and Section 18 disposition programs and associated rehabilitation activities. The proposed action involved 37 residential buildings (approximately 2,625 residential units) within several groups of NYCHA housing developments: Armstrong I/II, Marcy-Greene Avenue Sites A and B, Berry Street-South 9th Street, Independence Towers, Williams Plaza, Warren Street Houses, and Weeksville Gardens. AKRF provided consulting services including preparation of the required environmental review documentation pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and HUD environmental standards (24 CFR Part 58), as well as supporting environmental studies related to hazardous materials, noise, and other areas. Mr. Werner managed the preparation of the environmental review documentation which required approval through NYCHA, HPD, and HUD; and also provided general consulting services to the clients and NYCHA to assist with navigating HUD’s environmental requirements for the RAD and Section 18 disposi- tion programs. City of New York - Dept. of Housing Preservation & Development (HPD) Office of Development, Building and Land Development Services - Environmental Planning While at a prior employer, Mr. Werner served as Director of Environmental Planning. He also previously served as Acting Director, Deputy Director, and Senior Environmental Planner. The Environmental Planning unit of HPD’s Division of Building and Land Development Services (BLDS) was charged with reviewing proposed affordable housing developments City-wide that sought City funding (and/or other City actions) through the Mayor’s “Housing New York” plan for environmental impacts in accordance with relevant laws and statutes. The City’s housing plan focused primarily on the development of much needed affordable housing (new construction as well as preservation) on both City- and privately-owned properties throughout the five boroughs of New York City. AARON WERNER, AICP Technical Director / Role: Planner Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold 21 Alicia Moore, MD, MUP Senior Professional / Planner Alicia Moore, JD, MUP is committed to sustainable development and community- driven planning. In addition to demonstrating project management abilities, she has experience with public speaking, government agencies, and stake- holder engagement. Relevant Experience Town of Dover NY, Town of Dover Planning Services, Dover, NY AKRF has provided on-going planning services to the Town of Dover in support of the Planning Board and Town Board for more than 10 years. Services include preparing reviews on behalf of the Planning and Town Boards, of site plan and subdivision applications, special permit applications, zoning compliance, and SEQRA (environmental review) documents. AKRF has also worked with the Town to update its zoning regulations for camp uses and the development review process. In addi- tion, AKRF has provided environmental impact review services for several large-scale residential developments and energy infrastructure projects in the Town. Alicia Moore serves as deputy project manager. Town of Southeast NY, Town of Southeast Planning Services, Southeast, NY AKRF has been providing planning services and support to the Town of Southeast Planning Board and Town Board for nearly 20 years, including the development of a Comprehensive Plan and a Special Area Plan for redevelopment of properties along Route 22 and zoning amendments for a variety of residential and commercial patterns. AKRF assists the Planning Board, Town Board, Architectural Review Board and Zoning Board of Appeals in reviewing site plan and subdivision applications and oversees the environmental review of large mixed-use development projects. AKRF also assists the Town with compliance with the New York State SPDES General Permit for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s). We developed the initial Stormwater Management Program (SWMP) in 2003 and have worked with the Town each year to implement provisions within the SWMP and ensure compliance with the General Permit. AKRF collaborates with the Town Board, Planning Board, Highway Superintendent, and Building Inspector to ensure Minimum Control Measures within the SWMP are being implemented and record keeping is maintained to satisfy the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). Drawing from her prior legal experience, Alicia drafts amendments to the Town’s zoning laws and reviews guidelines to address new land-uses within the Town. Village of Mamaroneck NY, Village of Mamaroneck Planning Services, Mamaroneck, NY AKRF is providing on-call planning services to the Village of Mamaroneck Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals, and Harbor & Coastal Zone Management Commission. AKRF is responsible for facilitating the review of large-scale applica- tions to the Village’s land use boards. As deputy project manager, Alicia reviews all incoming land use applications, provides written analysis of zoning code and policy compliance, and attends all Planning Board meetings. AKRF is currently leading the environmental review of a redevelopment project currently in front of the Village’s Background Education MUP, Hunter College CUNY, Urban Planning, 2019 JD, Brooklyn Law School, , 2007 Bachelor of Urban and Environmental Planning (BUEP), University of Virginia, School of Architecture, Urban and Environmental Planning, 2003 ArcGIS training through ESRI programs Professional Memberships Member, American Planning Association (APA) Years of Experience 4 years in the industry < 1 year with AKRF Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold22 Zoning Board of Appeals. The project is seeking multiple area variances, site plan approvals and several permits from the Village to facilitate the expansion of a self-storage facility. Town of Orangetown NY, Orangetown Comprehensive Plan, Orangetown NY AKRF was retained by the Town of Orangetown to update its Comprehensive Plan to establish a guiding framework for future sustainable development, economic growth, and natural resource preservation in the Town. AKRF, with its subconsultant MUD Workshop, facilitated on online survey and led a series of public workshops to gather community feedback. Through this public engagement process, AKRF prepared the and vetted the vision and goals for the Comprehensive Plan. AKRF is currently working with the Comprehensive Plan Committee (CPC) to refine implementa- tion strategies, develop zoning recommendations, and to prepare the final Comprehensive Plan document. Ultimately, the Comprehensive Plan will reflect the goals and recom- mendations of the Orangetown community and will serve as a blueprint for the Town’s growth and development in the coming years. Alicia crafted implementation strategies for the community’s land use and zoning objectives. Previous Experience City of Fayetteville, Development Services Department, Fayetteville, NC Prior to joining AKRF, Alicia Moore was a Senior Planner for the City of Fayetteville, North Carolina. As the primary planner responsible for long-term strategic planning, Alicia produced rolling reports and recommendations for zoning code amendments, drafted the legal ordinances, and presented the proposals to the city’s Planning Board and City Council for adoption. A few of the significant zoning ordinances that Alicia authored include: Food Truck Courts, Signs (Nonconforming), Downtown Zoning Districts, and Accessory Uses. Alicia generated policy recommendations for issues including homelessness/tenting, group homes, and multimodal transit. In collaboration with local stakeholders, Alicia developed neighborhood plans with accompanying action-based frameworks to implement identified economic, environmental, social, and zoning objectives. Working with the City’s Legal Department, Alicia managed sweeping updates to local zoning regulations and review protocols necessary to comply with new State laws. Prior to working for the City, Alicia sat on the Fayetteville Planning Commission, conducting public legislative hearings to review develop- ment applications and zoning amendments. Hiller, PC, New York, NY Prior to joining AKRF, Alicia Moore was a Land Use Attorney for Hiller, PC in New York City where she represented community interests to ensure equitable and sustainable development in accordance with the NYC Zoning Resolution, environmental laws (SEQRA/CEQR), and public policy. To curb harmful development practices, Alicia formulated solutions to curtail the exploitation of loopholes in zoning and environmental regulations. Alicia participated in Town Halls, public forums and meetings of the City Planning Commission, Board of Standards and Appeals, and various Community Boards. Fund for the City of New York (FCNY), New York, NY Prior to joining AKRF, as a Community Planning Fellow with the Fund for the City of New York, Alicia contributed to the Community Development Plan for Queens Community Board 1, including identification of growth trends and collabora- tive assessment of the community’s goals, objectives, and implementation strategies. NYC Department of City Planning (DCP), New York, NY Prior to joining AKRF, while pursuing her master’s degree, Alicia served as General Counsel Intern for the NYC Department of City Planning (DCP). As part of the position, Alicia assisted the DCP Office of Counsel to provide legal advice and services to staff on land-use and zoning law, land-use applications, State and City environmental protec- tion (SEQRA/CEQR), litigation involving the agency, and compliance with the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL/ FOIA). Alicia drafted memoranda of regulatory analysis, including guidelines and advisory opinions issued by the NY Department of State. Alicia Moore, MD, MUP Senior Professional / Planner Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold 23 Kenneth Mack Senior Technical Director - GIS / Role: Graphic Lead Kenneth Mack is the Director of the firm’s Geographic Information Systems (GIS) team. His experience includes work in the field of geospatial analysis and geographic data development in both the public and private sectors. He and his team act as a hub of innovation and interdisciplinary energy for the firm, working closely with urban planners, environmental scientists and engineers alike in support of AKRF’s projects. In addition to providing data management, spatial analysis, application development, map produc- tion, and three-dimensional (3D) computer modeling, Kenneth specializes in producing shadow studies for environ¬mental impact assessments. He has produced shadow analyses for many of the firm’s high-profile development projects. Kenneth manages AKRF's extensive database of geographic information, including topographic data, land use and zoning, economic and census data, natural resources, addresses and property information, buildings, transportation features, aerial and satel- lite imagery, computer-aided designs (CAD) drawings and historic maps. He performs various tasks and analyses in support of AKRF projects, including data migration and integration, geocoding, watershed flow analysis, georeferencing historic maps and other raster images, overlay analysis, proximity analysis, GIS application programming, and report-quality map production. Kenneth is also responsible for GIS data and software product evaluation and acquisition. Relevant Experience East Village/Lower East Side Rezoning, New York, NY The New York City Department of City Planning (DCP) on behalf of the City Planning Commission (CPC) as lead agency, and in conjunction with the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD), is proposing a number of actions, including zoning map and text amendments and the disposition of a City property, affecting all or portions of 111 blocks in the East Village and Lower East Side neighborhoods of Manhattan. The purpose of the rezoning to preserve the low- to mid-rise character of the East Village and Lower East Side neighborhoods while concentrating new development towards specific corridors that are more suited for new residential construction with incentives for affordable housing. The project would also protect existing non-conforming street-level commercial uses in current residential districts that characterize these neighborhoods. Kenneth Mack worked in several technical areas for the environmental impact report for this comprehensive rezoning. Kenneth was in charge of the shadows analysis for this large-scale project; he developed a three-dimensional model of the study area, performed the solar study, wrote the Shadows chapter and produced diagrams. He also provided mapping support for other technical areas for the Environmental Impact Statement, including land use and zoning, community facilities and open space. Atlantic Yards Arena and Redevelopment Project, Brooklyn, NY AKRF prepared the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Blight Study for this ambitious and controversial land use initiative. The project, overseen by the ESDC, called for the redevelopment of an underutilized and underdeveloped 22-acre site in the Atlantic Terminal area of Brooklyn, adjacent to Downtown Brooklyn. The project Background Education MA, City University of New York, Hunter College, Anthropology, 2015 BA, The New School, Eugene Lang College, Economics and Politics, 1992 Professional Memberships Member, New York State Geospatial Information Systems Association Member, New York City Geospatial Information System and Mapping Organization Years of Experience 24 years in the industry 16 years with AKRF Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold24 includes a new arena for the Nets basketball team, along with mixed-income residential, commercial office, retail, hotel, and community facility uses. The total project cost is estimated at $4.5 billion. Key issues addressed in the EIS include: potential impacts on water quality in the Gowanus Canal and East River; concerns over land use compatibility and urban design; potential adverse traffic and air quality impacts; and potential adverse effects on socioeconomic conditions in the study area. In addition, the EIS presented a detailed description of construction activities and phasing, and an analysis of potential averse impacts during project construction. Kenneth Mack performed the shadow analysis, wrote the Shadows chapter of the EIS, and produced supporting diagrams. He also prepared responses to comments concerning shadows after the public review. Kenneth additionally provided GIS support for other technical areas of the EIS. New York City Department of Design & Construction, East Side Coastal Resiliency (ESCR) Preliminary & Final Design, New York, NY AKRF is leading a multidisciplinary design team that was selected by the New York City agency partnership of NYCDDC, New York City Department of Parks and Recreation (NYC Parks), New York City Department of Transportation, and the Mayor’s Office of Recovery and Resiliency (ORR) to provide engineering, planning, landscape architecture, urban design and community engagement services for the Preliminary and Final Design Services for East Side Coastal Resiliency (ESCR). The flood protection system will involve complete reconstruction of East River Park to raise elevations in the park eight to twelve feet in order to turn the entire park into a quasi flood protection berm. Kenneth Mack conducted property research to evaluate the need for land acquisition, site selection of public facili- ties, and the potential for modifications of the City Map. In collaboration with the firm's arborist and design team, Kenneth developed a tree inventory mobile app following NYC Parks Department protocols. For visual impact studies, Kenneth integrated topographic and infrastructure data to develop a CAD-format 3D computer model of the study area. United Water New York's Rockland Hudson River Desalination Project, Haverstraw, NY AKRF provided extensive environmental services in support of the Haverstraw Water Supply Project proposed by United Water New York, the utility company responsible for providing the public water supply of Rockland County, NY. The project involves the development and operation of a new 7.5 million gallon per day water treatment facility that incor- porates desalination technology, as well as a water intake that will draw water from the Hudson River. The services provided include the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and environmental permits. In addition, AKRF provided water demand and consumption analyses to help determine the size, capacity, and phasing of the treatment plant. Kenneth Mack oversaw the extensive GIS component of this project, including hydrologic flow and watershed modeling, viewshed analysis, and overall data and mapping coordination. Adelaar Resort (Formerly known as Concord Resort), Thompson, NY As part of a multi-disciplinary team, AKRF is providing planning, permits/entitlements, environmental analyses and civil engineering services for a 1,500 acre Master Planned resort community. The proposed project will transform a historically significant site in the Catskills into a world class resort property. Kenneth Mack’s GIS team helped in the design of a compre - hensive stormwater management system that addresses both on-site and off-site improvements. The design will incorporate green infrastructure practices that would allow for capturing, treating, and infiltrating the stormwater runoff by utilizing rain gardens, pervious pavement, and bioretention facilities. Willets Point EIS, Queens, NY Kenneth Mack conducted the shadow analysis and provided mapping support for the firm’s Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the development of parcels east of Shea Stadium in Willets Point. Components of the development plan include residential, retail, commercial office, conven- tion space, recreational uses, and area-wide transportation improvements. Kenneth Mack Senior Technical Director - GIS / Role: Graphic Lead Hamilton Green (200 Hamilton Avenue), White Plains, NY AKRF prepared the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) for the development of Hamilton Green—a new vibrant, mixed-use community in downtown White Plains, NY. Hamilton Green, a transit-oriented development (TOD), has been designed as a bridge between the White Plains TransCenter and the downtown core. The project incorporates a unique, food-centric destination—an upscale Food + Craft Hall (42,000 sf), innovative and active open space totaling 57,000 sf (35 percent of the site), 900 dwelling units, and an additional 48,000 sf of street-level retail. The City of White Plains adopted a SEQRA Findings Statement and adopted the proposed zoning for Hamilton Green in July 2018. AKRF also developed a new Transit Oriented District with design guidelines. Town of Southeast Planning Services, Southeast, NY Since 1998, AKRF has served as planning consultant to the Town of Southeast in Putnam County providing site plan- ning and environmental review services, and coordinating development approvals among the Town’s reviewing boards. AKRF has worked with the Planning and Town Boards to update Town zoning regulations, historic resource protections, local environmental regulations (stormwater management and wetlands), and the development review processes. In 2014, AKRF facilitated the update of the Town’s Comprehensive Plan, which AKRF previously prepared in 2002. As part of this initiative, AKRF analyzed the existing zoning and provided extensive recommendations to modernize the Code. Several of these initiatives were imple- mented in 2015, including the creation of a new Special Route 6 Zoning District between the Village of Brewster and the City of Danbury, CT, to stimulate commercial development in this corridor. FIRM EXPERIENCE Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold26 Village of Pelham Manor Planning Services, Pelham Manor, NY AKRF has provided the Village of Pelham Manor with on-call planning services for 15 years. We developed intersection improvements to New York State and Westchester County Roads; updated the Village’s zoning regulations that facili- tated the transformation of a blighted manufacturing district into a downtown retail and business district; and performed site plan reviews of major applications. In 2012, the Village of Pelham Manor received a Planning Achievement Award from the Westchester Municipal Planning Federation for its Business District Revitalization — a project for which AKRF provided land use, zoning, and environmental review. Goshen Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code Update, Goshen,NY AKRF assisted in the adoption of a revised Comprehensive Plan and a wholesale zoning code rewrite that integrated progressive land conservation techniques to preserve valuable agricultural and scenic properties within this Orange County community. AKRF guided the Town through the SEQRA process by preparing the environmental documenta- tion for the Comprehensive Plan and zoning code and by leading educational sessions with the Town Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals, and Town Board members on how to implement the new zoning through project review. From 2003 to 2007, AKRF also served as the planning consultant to the Town of Goshen from. In that capacity, the firm reviewed residential subdivisions, commercial site plan applications, and provided general consultation on matters related to Town-wide planning and zoning. In 2004, the Town of Goshen adopted an award-winning Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan that requires conservation design subdivisions and encourages Traditional Neighborhood Development in areas targeted for growth. AKRF assisted in the preparation of the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan and prepared SEQRA documentation. The Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code are intended to preserve the Town’s remaining agricultural uses and rural character while allowing for new development to occur in selected areas. Village of Irvington Waterfront Zoning, Irvington, NY AKRF prepared a zoning strategy and draft zoning language to implement a new vision for Irvington’s formerly industrial waterfront. While the waterfront had been subject to adap- tive reuse sponsored by a private developer, the underlying zoning was still for industrial uses and would not allow the flexibility needed to achieve full redevelopment of the historic manufacturing buildings on the waterfront. AKRF developed strategies for mixed-use, open space, parking, and design standards that will be applied through zoning to facilitate redevelopment. Salibury Zoning Revisions Salisbury, CT On behalf of the Town of Salisbury, CT, AKRF prepared zoning text amendments to create multi-family zoning district over- lays within downtown Salisbury and Lakeville. In addition to the new overlay districts, the Town of Salisbury zoning code also now allows flexibility in converting existing structures to allow multi-family residences. AKRF prepared the text and map revisions, met with the members of the Planning and Zoning Commission, stakeholder groups and conducted several public engagement meetings. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously in favor of the zoning code amendments, which were adopted in September 2019. 27Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold Riverhead Comprehensive Plan, Long Island, NY AKRF was selected to update the Town of Riverhead's Comprehensive Plan. The Town, including about 50,000 residents and 11 hamlets, is faced with a number of land use challenges and development opportunities, including retail vacancies, growing demand for housing, agricultural and natural resource concerns, and a location in a federal Opportunity Zone. AKRF is leading an extensive public engagement process including interviews with Town Departments and key community stakeholders; an online public survey; project website; online and interactive mapping; advisory committee meetings; and hybrid virtual and in-person hamlet/community meetings. AKRF is also preparing an economic and market trends analysis to identify housing, retail, and other townwide and hamlet-based recommendations. In addition, AKRF is developing zoning recommendations including an update the Town’s Transfer of Development Rights program. The project will culminate in a GEIS to facilitate implementation of the plan . The Project Website may be viewed at https://townofriverheadcomprehensiveplanupdate.com Downtown DC-1 Zoning District Bulk Study, Town of Riverhead, NY AKRF was retained by the Town of Riverhead to prepare a Bulk Study of the Downtown Center 1: Main Street (DC-1) Zoning Use District, which is intended to improve the implementation of the DC-1 zoning district in Riverhead’s downtown, and to encourage development in compliance with “smart growth” principles. Following the adoption of the Town of Riverhead Comprehensive Plan in 2003, the Town rezoned the study area from a Business D classification to the current DC-1 Zoning Use District. The purpose of the rezoning was to encourage smart growth planning within the downtown area. Since the rezoning, the Town received several applications for the redevelopment of parcels within the study area, which proposed significantly larger develop - ments than the existing conditions at these locations, and are in conformance with the current DC-1 zoning regulations. The DC-1 Study Area is in the downtown area of Riverhead hamlet in the Town of Riverhead. The study area is located near and to the northwest of the border between the Towns of Southampton and Riverhead, and encompasses approxi- mately 42 acres. Since it was expected that in the future the Town would receive additional applications to redevelop other parcels in the study area to the relatively high density permitted by the DC-1 Zoning Use District, the Town was concerned that the new DC-1 zoning may result in develop- ment well beyond what the Town intended for this area of Downtown Riverhead. The purpose of the Bulk Study was to evaluate the existing zoning regulations and their potential effects within the context of relevant issues such as land use, public policy, infrastructure, historic resources, and the overall community and visual character of the area, and to assess a potential development scenario based on possible changes to the DC-1 Zoning Use District regulations that will further the Town’s goals with respect to the future development of Downtown Riverhead’s DC-1 Zoning Use District. AKRF evaluated the existing DC-1 zoning regulations as they pertain to the bulk characteristics of building height, lot coverage, and floor area, and considered the provisions for private parking, in the context of the DC-1 Study Area. The Bulk Study included recommendations to improve the current zoning district regulations and the overall zoning strategy in the DC-1 Study Area, and modify the existing regulations pertaining to building height, setbacks, floor-area-ratio (FAR), lot occupancy, and land use. A by-product of this study was a Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold28 computerized bulk model of the downtown area that can be used by the Town’s Planning Department to evaluate additional potential development and individual applications as they are submitted. AKRF provided training to the Town's Planning Department on how to use the bulk model for the evaluation of future development proposals. SEQRA Review of Southold Comprehensive Plan, Southold, NY AKRF assisted the Town of Southold Planning Department with performing review of their Comprehensive Plan Update pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). AKRF evaluated the goals and recommenda- tions of the update in the context of the Town's existing and anticipated future conditions and resources to determine the potential for any impacts. In accordance with SEQRA, AKRF completed the Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Parts 1, 2, and 3 on behalf of the Town of Southold Planning and Town Boards, working closely with the Town's Planning Department. AKRF analyzed potential impacts for a range of technical areas including agricultural, aesthetic, cultural, transportation, and socioeconomic resources. Southold Comprehensive Plan Transportation and Infrastructure Chapter, Southold, NY AKRF assisted the Town of Southold Planning Department with the preparation of the Transportation and Infrastructure Chapter of their Comprehensive Plan. AKRF created GIS inventories of Town roads, sidewalks, bike routes, bike trails and paths, ferries, commuter rail, buses, parking, truck routes, and airports. Other tasks included assisting with public outreach by presenting the draft chapter at three public meetings, and Planning Board, Town Board and Transportation Committee meetings. For each hamlet, AKRF estimated the amount of vehicular traffic that would be generated in the future under commercial and residential buildout of undeveloped land per existing zoning, and drafted potential improvements or strategies to accommo - date future growth. AKRF also developed recommendations, strategies, and policies for Complete Streets, pedestrian safety, green infrastructure, improved cellular service and utility service, and peak season tourism traffic management. Town of Southold, Southold Comprehensive Plan Graphic Design, Southold, NY AKRF formatted and organized the comprehensive plan indi- vidual chapters created by the Town Planning Department and developed a style and color guide in collaboration with the Planning Department and Comp Plan Committee. AKRF created an Executive Summary, and developed infographics to convey key statistics, data, and information. AKRF also developed a GIS map figure template and formatted Town GIS maps. Other work included editing the text of each chapter for consistency and readability, updating socioeco - nomic chapter data, and publishing digital and hard copies of final comp plan document. 29Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold Town of Dover Planning Services, Dover, NY AKRF has provided ongoing planning services to the Town of Dover in Dutchess County in support of the Planning Board and Town Board for over 10 years. Services include preparing reviews, on behalf of the Planning Board, of site plan and subdivision applications, zoning compliance, and SEQRA (environmental review) documents. In addition, AKRF has prepared several zoning text amendments for the Town, including updates to site plan review process, and certain special permit uses. Town of Amenia Planning Sevices, Amenia, NY AKRF is currently retained by the Town of Amenia in Dutchess County to assist the Town Board, Planning Board, and Zoning Board of Appeals with application review on an as-needed basis. Town of Amenia Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Update, Amenia, NY In 2006 , AKRF was retained by the Town to assist with completion of their Comprehensive Plan update, and new Zoning Law and Zoning Map. As part of that project, AKRF completed various technical components of the Comprehensive Plan, such as: an update to the conditions and trends; the potential effects of build-out under existing zoning; and the proposed hamlet-center zoning. The trends analysis included demographic, housing, natural resources, historic resources, infrastructure, and other technical analyses. AKRF also conducted the New York State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) of the Comprehensive Plan update, and new Zoning Law and Map. To keep the Town Board on its anticipated schedule, AKRF oversaw the successful completion of an expanded Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) and thorough Negative Declaration, instead of a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Village of Hempstead Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA) Step 2 Nomination Study, Village of Hempstead, NY The Village of Hempstead, through its Community Development Agency (CDA), has been actively facilitating the redevelopment and revitalization of downtown Hempstead for over a decade. As a continuation of those effects, AKRF and its teaming partners were retained by the CDA to conduct a New York State BOA Step 2 Nomination Study in order to advance targeted recommendations for underutilized parcels within the Village’s downtown area. AKRF focused on identifying community assets, chal- lenges, and financially feasible market opportunities with high potential to serve as redevelopment catalysts. AKRF emphasized collaboration and the formation of partnerships through a community engagement strategy that included steering committee meetings, community-wide meetings, and individual outreach meetings with local institutions and stakeholders. As part of its implementation strategy, AKRF recommended a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) zone for the location of a higher-density housing in walking distance to train and bus service; a downtown core with a walkable “main street” retail environment; and creation of a health and community facilities hub. The health and community facilities hub would provide a downtown medical and social infrastructure cluster to provide services currently lacking in the Village, while creating new employment and supporting less affluent residents. In addition, a future inno- vation district would draw in regional educational institutions to cooperate with local manufacturing businesses to advance the skill sets of the local workforce and to expand the local qualified labor pool. AKRF and its teaming partner produced a Marketing Brochure to illustrate the design concepts and attract investment. REFERENCES 1) Lawrence Schopfer Village Administrator Phone: (914) 591-4358 lschopfer@irvingtonny.gov Project: Irvington Zoning Update (North Broadway) and Waterfront Zoning Timeframe: 2019/2020 (North Broadway) 2) Tom LaPerch, Southeast PB Chair (845) 729-4211, tlaperch@hlcommercialgroup.com Project: Planning Services (e.g., Route 22) Timeframe: Last 20 years and 2020/2021 (Route 22) 3) Jefferson V. Murphree, AICP Building & Planning Administrator Town of Riverhead 201 Howell Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 (631) 727-3200, ext. 239; murphree@townofriverheadny.gov Projects: Riverhead Comprehensive Plan Update (2020-ongoing) Riverhead Bulk Study (2009) 4) Ryan Courtien, Chairman rcourtien@doverny.us 126 East Duncan Hill Road Dover Plains, New York 12522 (845) 832-6111 Ext. 100 Project: Town of Dover Planning Services Timeframe: 2007 to present 5) John Pierpont villagemanager@pelhammanor.org 4 Penfield Place Pelham Manor, NY 10803 (914) 738-8820 Project: Village of Pelham Manor Planning Services Timeframe: 2002 to Present 2. APPROACH TO PROJECT 2. APPROACH TO PROJECT I. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AKRF understands that the goal of this project is to provide recommendations for updating the Town’s zoning code to implement the objectives outlined in the Southold Town Comprehensive Plan. Below is an outline of the objectives that provide the foundation for this zoning update: OBJECTIVE 2.1 REVIEW ZONING FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS HAMLET CENTERS 1. Strengthen the hamlet centers through innovative mixed-use zoning with special attention on design standards that are addressed through hybrid form-based code or similar zoning actions in the r hamlet centers 2. Provide for different levels of intensity for certain uses in the hamlet centers based on available infrastructure, since each hamlet is unique in scale and supporting infrastructure. It is noted that although there are ten (1) named hamlets in Southold Town, only eight (8) have a defined hamlet center. BUSINESS CORRIDORS OUTSIDE HAMLET CENTERS 1. Create a new zoning district for commercial and industrial uses along major roads outside the hamlet centers. 2. Revisit the bulk schedule and parking requirements for commercial and industrial zoning districts based on current demand and needs. TRANSITIONAL ZONES 1. Evaluate the uses allowed in transitional zoning districts (Limited Business, Residential Office) to determine whether they require any updates to ensure they function as transition zones. Optionally, consider a new transitional zoning district. 2. Identify areas with transitions from commercial/ industrial to residential uses to determine if transitional zoning is appropriate. MARINE ZONES Evaluate the uses and bulk schedule of the marine zoning districts (Marine I & Marine II) to ensure these zones are consistent with and support the goals of the Town. SPLIT-ZONED PARCELS Currently the Town Code provides little guidance on how to apply the bulk schedule in the case of split-zones. To address this need, the Code will be evaluated as follows: 1. Identify the affected properties and clarify how the Town Code addresses these split-zoned parcels. 2. Consider re-zoning/mapping to reduce or eliminate split-zoned parcels, as needed. LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONES Evaluate the need to amend these zoning districts, especially those proximate to hamlet centers, to accommodate new uses or mixed uses. ADDITIONAL ACTIONS We understand that this list above is not inclusive of all possible zoning actions. For example, the Resort Residential Zoning District is not mentioned in the plan; however it too may be subject to evaluation for update. This scope there- fore includes updating the Resort Residential Zoning District, 03Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold but does not include other zoning updates not specifically mentioned in this scope. OBJECTIVE 2.2 REVIEW ZONING FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS WATER QUALITY The Comprehensive Plan’s Water Resources Section of Chapter 6, Natural Resources & Environment provides detail as it pertains to water quality and watershed protections One objective may be to develop a town-wide Aquifer Protection Overlay District. In addition, Objective 2.4 is directed at achieving consistency in Town land use and water source protection through the re-evaluation of zoning including permitted uses in capture zones, wellheads, and surface water (Fishers Island) reservoir contributing areas. AKRF will also evaluate the need for a Groundwater Protection Zone on Plum Island to comply with Objective 2.12. SIZE OF FUTURE HOMES It is noted that house size is currently being reviewed by the Town Board which may require an update to the relevant code section. TRANSIENT RENTALS AKRF will work with the Town to draft a short-term rental ordinance. AGRICULTURE AKRF will review this Chapter of the Town Code to ensure the language allows for diversity and new ideas in farming uses and activities and is flexible on future agricultural practices and consistent with the definitions and policies of the New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets while also addressing public health, safety, and welfare concerns. This may include: 1) Exempting certain agricultural structures/uses from site plan review; 2) Broadening the Town Code to specifically allow on-farm processing of any type of crop into retail and wholesale-ready products (e.g., pies, preserves, chips, wine, beer, vodka), including the processing of livestock; 3) Amending definitions in the Town Code to be consistent and up-to-date with current and future agricul- tural practices (Chapters 70, 72, 240, 280); 4) Adding defini- tions to the Town Code to clarify agriculture-related terms where necessary; 5) Defining a development right and what uses remain after development rights are purchased; 6) On land where development rights have been sold to the Town (Town-preserved farmland), consider providing the same agricultural rights as land that has not had its development rights sold; 7) Explore ways to allow farms to have multiple agricultural uses without having to satisfy the minimum lot size requirement for each use; and 8) Consider bringing back the “set-off” for active farms only, with strict new rules to prevent the incremental subdivision into many lots over time; 9) Clarify what is currently allowed under Town Code for aquaculturists to retail their harvest in Southold; 10) Land containing ancillary land-based structures used for aquacul- ture should be included in the Agricultural District and be eligible for the Agricultural Assessment; and 11) Consider an increase in the lot coverage for greenhouses. COMMERCIAL USES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (PRE- EXISTING NON-CONFORMING USES) OBJECTIVE 2.3 REVIEW NEED FOR NEW ZONING DISTRICTS New zoning districts may be needed where existing zoning districts do not achieve the goals of the plan. This would address Chapters 4 through 12 of the Southold Town Comprehensive Plan which are each more specific to a narrower topic that will be reviewed with the Town and considered for the zoning update. II. SCOPE OF WORK As outlined in the RFP, the scope of work for this project includes a series of tasks, which include assumptions AKRF has made where needed to clarify the effort to be undertaken for each task. As described below: A. REVIEW SOUTHOLD TOWN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AKRF will review the vision statement, and the goals and objectives of all chapters in the Southold Town Comprehensive Plan ( February 2020) , to ensure the updated zoning code addresses the zoning update needs and will be consistent with the Town’s vision and the Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 3, Land Use & Zoning identifies sections of the zoning code and map that need to be addressed in Goal 2, Review and Update Zoning Town-Wide. Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold04 B. REVIEW ZONING CODE AKRF will produce an assessment of the existing code and other related sections of the Town Code to identify questions of clarity and consistency with other sections of the Town Code, as well as ease of use. Chapter 3 of the Southold Town Comprehensive Plan provides a starting place for this assess- ment with six objectives in Goal 1. As part of this task, AKRF will evaluate potential affects on future transportation and traffic under a buildout scenario with the current zoning. The Town will provide relevant data, and this evaluation can be performed as an expansion and update of the assessment done as part of Chapter 4 of the Comprehensive Plan. This zoning code update is assumed to build upon the trip generation AKRF completed for the Comprehensive Plan Update. AKRF will reevaluate this trip generation using gross square footage (GSF) and dwelling unit (DU) inputs with a preliminary screening of the poten- tial for significant adverse traffic impacts along corridors or at specific locations. C. RESEARCH AND PROVIDE OPTIONS FOR ZONING MODIFICATIONS BASED ON EMPIRICAL EXAMPLES AKRF will research and provide a menu of options for zoning, including successful examples from up to three (3) other municipalities with issues and settings similar to Southold (not all examples may be from other Long Island municipalities). D. PROVIDE VISUAL TOOLS, INCLUDING 3D VISUAL SIMULATIONS AND MODELING effects of the proposed zoning code changes. Visual tools will include existing and proposed zoning figures and 3D modeling for proposed building envelopes in the context of adjoining uses and the built form. Costs assume AKRF will prepare up to two (2) 3D models/simulations and four (4) pairs of zoning figures (existing and proposed). Model simulations may be used as representative of similar condi- tions throughout the Town; costs do not assume modeling for every location where changes to visual/bulk conditions resulting from proposed zoning changes could occur. E. ASSESS EFFECTS OF THE ZONING MODIFICATIONS AKRF will conduct a screening-level assessment of potential impacts of new zoning options on traffic, community character and quality of life, and up to three (3) additional technical areas to assess potential impacts on the environ- ment (e.g., land use, natural resources). These assessments will be qualitative and will not include quantitative analyses, recognizing that the Town would also l have to comply with SEQRA before adopting any proposed zoning code or map changes. Since the range of those actions is yet to determined, it is premature to develop a scope or budget at this time, since the required level of environmental review (e.g., EAF or EIS or GEIS) is unknown at this time. Once the proposed zoning amendments are finalized, AKRF will submit a separate scope and budget to comply with SEQRA. F. COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AKRF will design and implement public outreach and engagement strategies in collaboration with the Town, including providing materials and assisting the Town with conducting public input meetings and collecting and assimilating public input into the recommendations. This outreach will include: a. Public information & education (AKRF will develop and maintain a project website linked to the Town website that will provide as an online portal for gathering public input and to provide all relevant information under review & discus- sion and be updated monthly. We will also provide up to two (2) Town-wide public meeting presentations (as described below in item #5) with maps and graphics to the Town for Channel 22); b. Quarterly status reports to the public on the progress of the update to zoning (to be posted on the project website); c. Public charrettes/public input meetings to review and provide input on specific work to update the zoning, including, but not limited to, the following: • Options for future zoning code and zoning map changes • Specific proposed zoning code and map changes; 05Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold We propose six (6) public, combined virtual/in-person (Hybrid) charrettes/meetings: Four (4) Charrettes: 3. Mattituck/Laurel (including Shore Acres & Waterville) 4. Cutchogue/Peconic (including East Cutchogue, Nassau Farms, New Suffolk, 5. Southold (including Laughing Waters, Bayview, Cedar Beach, Reydon Shores, Beixedon Estates, and Arshamomaque) 6. Orient/Orient Point/Greenpoint (including non-Village areas of Greenport West, Stirling, East Marion, Orient, Orient Point, and Fishers Island) Two (2) Public Meetings: 7. Two (2) follow-up meetings, to present "results" either online only, or hybrid, but both at Town Hall, or some other central location procured by the Town (if in person).; e. Up to five (5) stakeholder interviews (phone calls or virtual meetings) or online focus group sessions to discuss particular topics Stakeholders may include business groups, senior citizens, families with children, agriculture industry, and county and transportation agencies. This scope does not include public hearings on specific proposals for Zoning Code and Zoning Map changes. If such hearings are required, a separate scope and fee will be provided at that time. This scope assumes that the Town will secure all meeting venues. AKRF will present crafted ideas/ land use proposals to the public during the charrettes that reflect the objectives of the Town’s Comprehensive Plan. G. DRAFT THE ZONING CODE TEXT UPDATES It will be the overarching goal of these updates to address the following: • New zoning must be consistent with the Town’s vision and the Southold Town Comprehensive Plan; • Design the code to be user-friendly – easy to understand, administer, and interpret; • Update terminology used throughout the code; • mprove overall organization; • Incorporate diagrams, tables, and illustrations to clarify and enhance understanding of the code; and • Use innovative zoning approaches where appropriate (e.g., design guidelines) H. DRAFT ZONING MAP UPDATES This scope includes creating figures that show proposed map changes in a GIS format, but does not include updating the Town’s official zoning map in GIS. . I. TOWN BOARD AND STAFF MEETINGS This scope includes up to six (6) meetings with the Town, including a kick off meeting to review the Comprehensive Plan update and the scope of the potential zoning modifica- tions with a total of two (2) in-person meetings. We also propose bi-weekly conference calls with the Town Planning Department, as needed and only if requested by the Town or the consultant at least one day prior to the scheduled call. J. DELIVERABLES • Menu of options for zoning action amendments • PowerPoint presentations, maps, visual aids, and other educational materials for public information as described above (website materials, charrettes, visuals for Channel 22) Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold06 • Updated draft zoning code (Up to two drafts of any one section) • Conceptual proposed zoning map markups/figures (Up to two drafts, including a final draft for presentation to the public). This scope does not include an updated zoning map for public hearing; AKRF will provide a separate scope and fee for updating the Town’s official zoning map once the conceptual maps are finalized) We understand that the zoning code and zoning map update process may evolve and be done in sections rather than all at once, and that the Town is open to suggestions from the consultant on the most efficient and effective process. Our proposed approach is to update the zoning code first, and once the proposed code changes are finalized, to finalize the Town’s Zoning Map based on the concept maps at a later date, with a scope and fee to be determined based on those concepts. AKRF will respond to up to two (2) rounds of comments from the Town on deliverables. Any additional rounds of revisions will be billed at our hourly rates. K. PUBLIC PROCESS STRATEGY & PUBLIC OUTREACH AKRF will provide and manage a creative and interactive public participation process that is robust, diverse, and equitable. This process will include innovative means and methods that raise community awareness and engagement. AKRF has a proven track record of strong communication and presentation skills (see Item F. above for more details). 07Southold Town Zoning Update Town of SoutholdSouthold Zoning UpdateMonth 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Month 7 Month 8 Month 9 Month 10 Month 11 Monnth 12 Month 13 Month 14 Month 15Task A: Review Southold Comprehensive PlanTask B: Existing Zoning Code Assessment Task C: Research and Menu of Zoning Options and ExamplesTask D: Provide Visual ToolsTask E: Conduct Impact AssessmentsTask F. Public Involvement4 Hamlet Meetings Final 2 Town‐wide MeetingsTask G: Draft Zoning Code UpdateTask H: Review Zoning Map and Make RecommendationsTask I: Attend Meetings with TownTask J: Final Deliverables 3. WORK SAMPLES 3. WORK SAMPLES See the Town of Riverhead Comprehensive Plan Update Project Website, including updated existing zoning maps, at TownofRiverheadComprehensivePlanUpdate.com See link to Newburgh (2015): https://ecode360.com/30538889 View 1A - Looking North East Riverhead Bulk Study - Existing Conditions Figure II-2A - Overall View Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource 05.01.2009 East M ar k et Str e et West Market Street Peconic Ave G r i n g A v e R o a n o k e A v e East A v e Ma p l e A v e Uni o n A v e Ost r a n d e r A v e Mc D e r m o t t A v e 2nd St Mc Dermott Ave View 1A - Looking North East Riverhead Bulk Study - Future Conditions Figure III-1A - Overall View Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource 05.01.2009 East M ar k et Str e et West Market Street Peconic Ave G r i n g A v e R o a n o k e A v e East A v e Ma p l e A v e Uni o n A v e Ost r a n d e r A v e Mc D e r m o t t A v e 2nd St Mc Dermott Ave Allowable New Zoning Building Height Allowable New Zoning Lot Coverage View 1B - Looking South from East Second Street & East Ave Riverhead Bulk Study - Existing Conditions View 1A - Looking North from Gring Avenue Figure II-2B - Views Looking South 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M View 1B - Looking South from East Second Street & East Ave Riverhead Bulk Study - Future Conditions View 1A - Looking North from Gring Avenue Figure III-1B - Views Looking South 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource Allowable New Zoning Building Height Allowable New Zoning Lot Coverage 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M View 2D - Looking West from East Main Street & Ostrander Ave Riverhead Bulk Study - Existing Conditions View 2C - Looking South from 2nd Street Figure II-2C - Views Looking South & South West 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M View 2D - Looking West from East Main Street & Ostrander Ave Riverhead Bulk Study - Future Conditions View 2C - Looking South from 2nd Street Figure III-1C - Views Looking South & South West 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource Allowable New Zoning Building Height Allowable New Zoning Lot Coverage 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M View 3F - Looking North East from Peconic Bridge Riverhead Bulk Study - Existing Conditions View 3E - Looking East from Gring Avenue Figure II-2D - Views Looking North & East 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M View 3F - Looking North East from Peconic Bridge Riverhead Bulk Study - Future Conditions View 3E - Looking East from Gring Avenue Figure III-1D - Views Looking North & East 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource Allowable New Zoning Building Height Allowable New Zoning Lot Coverage 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M View 4H - Looking North West from Aquarium Riverhead Bulk Study - Existing Conditions View 4G - Looking North from Riverhead - Hampton Bays Rd Figure II-2E - Views Looking North 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource View 4H - Looking North West from Aquarium Riverhead Bulk Study - Future Conditions View 4G - Looking North from Riverhead - Hampton Bays Rd Figure III-1E - Views Looking North 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource Allowable New Zoning Building Height Allowable New Zoning Lot Coverage View 5J - Street View from Roanoke Ave Looking Towards East Main Street Riverhead Bulk Study - Existing Conditions View 5I - Street View Looking East from Main Street & Peconic Ave Figure II-2F - Street Views Looking South & East 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M View 5J - Street View from Roanoke Ave Looking Towards East Main Street Riverhead Bulk Study - Future Conditions View 5I - Street View Looking East from Main Street & Peconic Ave Figure III-1F - Street Views Looking South & East 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource Allowable New Zoning Building Height Allowable New Zoning Lot Coverage 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M View 6L - Street View Looking North from Peconic River Parking Lot 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M Riverhead Bulk Study - Existing Conditions View 6K - Street View Looking East from East Main Street near Roanoke Avenue Figure II-2G - Street Views Looking East & North 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource Allowable New Zoning Building Height Allowable New Zoning Lot Coverage View 6L - Street View Looking North from Peconic River Parking Lot 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M Riverhead Bulk Study - Future Conditions View 6K - Street View Looking East from East Main Street near Roanoke Avenue Figure III-1G - Street Views Looking East & North 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource Allowable New Zoning Building Height Allowable New Zoning Lot Coverage View 7N - Street View Looking South from Maple Avenue towards Main Street Riverhead Bulk Study - Existing Conditions View 7M - Street View Looking South from East Avenue towards Main Street Figure II-2H - Street Views Looking South 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M View 7N - Street View Looking South from Maple Avenue towards Main Street Riverhead Bulk Study - Future Conditions View 7M - Street View Looking South from East Avenue towards Main Street Figure III-1H - Street Views Looking South 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource Allowable New Zoning Building Height Allowable New Zoning Lot Coverage 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M View 8P - Street View Looking West down Main Street from Ostrander Avenue Riverhead Bulk Study - Existing Conditions View 8O - Street View Looking North from Peconic River Waterfront Figure II-2I - Street Views Looking West & North 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M View 8P - Street View Looking West down Main Street from Ostrander Avenue Riverhead Bulk Study - Future Conditions View 8O - Street View Looking North from Peconic River Waterfront Figure III-1I - Street Views Looking West & North 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource Allowable New Zoning Building Height Allowable New Zoning Lot Coverage 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M 5I 5J 6L 3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M View 9R - Street View Looking South from North Parking Lot near East Ave Riverhead Bulk Study - Existing Conditions View 9Q - Street View Looking South from North Parking Lot near Roanoke Ave Figure II-2J - Street Views Looking South 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource 5I 5J 6L3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M9R9Q 10S 10T 5I 5J 6L3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M9R9Q 10S 10T View 9R - Street View Looking South from North Parking Lot near East Ave Riverhead Bulk Study - Future Conditions View 9Q - Street View Looking South from North Parking Lot near Roanoke Ave Figure III-1J - Street Views Looking South 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource Allowable New Zoning Building Height Allowable New Zoning Lot Coverage 5I 5J 6L3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M9R9Q 10S 10T 5I 5J 6L3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M9R9Q 10S 10T View 10T - Street View Looking North from Peconic River Parking Lot near Benjamin House Riverhead Bulk Study - Existing Conditions View 10S - Street View Looking North from Peconic River Waterfront Park near Peconic Bridge Figure II-2K - Street Views Looking North 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource 5I 5J 6L3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M9R9Q 10S 10T 5I 5J 6L3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M9R9Q 10S 10T View 10T - Street View Looking North from Peconic River Parking Lot near Benjamin House Riverhead Bulk Study - Future Conditions View 10S - Street View Looking North from Peconic River Waterfront Park near Peconic Bridge Figure III-1K - Street Views Looking North 05.01.2009 Existing Building Proposed Building Historic Resource or Landmark Building Potential Historic Resource Allowable New Zoning Building Height Allowable New Zoning Lot Coverage 5I 5J 6L3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M9R9Q 10S 10T 5I 5J 6L3F 8P 3E 2D 1A 1B 2C 4H6K 7N 8O 4G 7M9R9Q 10S 10T P e c o n i c R i v e rCR 73E M A IN 2 N D S T 3 S T EAST AVW 2 MAPL E AVUNI ON AVE M A IN S T W M A I N S TGRI F F I NG AV E S E C O N D S T OS T RANDE R AV R A I L R O A D AV PECONIC AVEMCDERMOTT AVH O W E L L L N N O R T H V IL L E T P K E E M A I N RIVERHEAD BULK STUDY Image source: Spring 2007, NYS Cyber Security & Critical Infrastructure Coordination Property data: January 2007, Town of Riverhead, NY DC-1 Study Area Lot CoverageFigure 1 Lot Coverage 0% - 25% 26% - 50% 51% - 75% 76% - 100% Greater than 100% Project Area Boundary 0 200 400Feet 6.30.09 Swan Pond Lake Panamoka Deep Pond UV25 UV25A Route 25A M id d le C o u n try R d WadingRiverManorRdSound A v eNCoun t r y R d N W a d i n g R iv e r R d Swan Pond Rd State Route 25 Hulse Land ing RdSchultzRdHalseyManorRdDavidTerryRdRiver Rd Mill R d 3rd Ave2ndAveH i l l S t Panamoka TrlTa r k h ill T rl L o n g P o n d R d Megan sWay Veteran s C irFarmRdN Oneid a R d 7thAveTheodoreRooseveltRdMi l l sRd WestLnBenjamin St Cherokee W a y Katie Dr Fire Ln Calver t o n C t Cedar St Eagle Rd B ay b e r r y Rd Doris Trl 1st StBirdieCtOak StP a r C t Cherry Ln Berry Ln GladysRd Oak RdPine St Daisy Ct ForestLn 1st Ave1 1 t h S t Kriste n Pl CastleCtHulseAve2nd St Green Ct Trappers Path RavineRdE a s t C t AmberLnChip Dr Rocklein Rd CarrieCtAlexander HamiltonRd 9th St H id d e n A c r e s P athLaurelLn Pe a c h S t DogwoodLn S5th St 7th StOakLn Ivy Cir2 1/2 St S u s a n DrE astRdRi t a C tDeer Field Cres 10th St South Path 8th St PonyT rl 12th St P a n s y C t H o l ly B e r r y Ct SunriseTrl21st St M e r o k e T r l 15th St WampumTrl4th StSuffolkAve D a n i e l C t O ld F ie ld C tE Francis St 1 7 t h S t C a n arsie Trl Cambrid g e Ct 14th St 3rd St Cricket Ct S Pond TrlFawn Xing 6th St Northview Trl Centerview Trl N Side Rd Wildw ood R dShort RdS o u n d RdBarbara Ct W o o dchuc k Path H i g h H i ll R d Old Stone Rd Hemlock Dr Fro n tSt D o verC tPheasant RunFairway DrLocustSt Joan Ct G r eenbria r R d H ic k ory Ct Lakesid e T r l SaltMeadowCt SunsetTrlTerry RdD o g W o o d L n Pond View Dr MicahLnLaurelHolwLeonardStO liver St ElizabethDrLyme St Core y T rl AnnaCt HulseLandingRdEmeraldLnMarianStTide CtHiddenPheasantPathDeerfiel dDrGatewayDrBeachC l u b Ln Cedar R dCentral AveMichiganWayLilco Rd N CountryRd Elms LnShelterHarborCt Pl ainViewDrHigh View Dr River RdThomasDrPrincetonBlv dSouthViewCt Unnamed StreetBetsyCt 5th AveForestHollowHu n t e r s T r l Pi neConeCtBeemer AveF a r m R d W Jacobs Ln WoodchuckHollowLn Birch Ln Diana Ct Oakvie w TrlWema Rd Mar iaCtWhiteSpruceDr Laur el C t Fawn MeadowPath C ro s s RdLong Bow N W adi ng R ive r R d Fairview AveShirley S t MichaelsLnEAmb e rL n Ho r t onCtFaye St Locust Rd Cheemaun TrlIroquois TrlCherokee TrlSeneca TrlAppleLnOld River RdLewinDr J o shua BD e a n e S t Howard S t Breezy Point R d G r e a t R ock Dr Scout Trl KayRdCarolin e D r C o t t o n T a ilC t John Jay Rd Crescent Ct Cliff RdE Russell Dr Wi l dwoodState Par k R i n g N e c k C t Manhasset Trl Old Orchard RdCliff Rd WEWoodlandDrG ullyR dLong View DrSetauket TrlSy l v e s t erRdNWoodsDrSunset Blvd G e r ald St I r o q u ois Way LaurinRdRoberts P a thFrost Ln E a s tLnForestTrl Ca nt er bur yDrDogWood DrFarm Rd S DeerRun SylvanPl StephenDrC a v a l gaIm p e rialW ayGabrielMillsRdPark St S o u n d br e ezeTrl Wildwood Dr16th S t Timber DrCorchaug TrlS u n wood D r 18th S t Zophar Mills Rd 1 9 t h S t 20th St Sunny Line DrWauwepex TrlRemsen R d Forest Hollow LnW ild w o odBeachB road View Ci rPeconic Field 4t hAveJosephineDrOakwoo d Dr S o u t h R d Bur manBlvdW W o o dlandDrO v e rlook Dr Sylv an DrLaurelHol l owCt L ittle B ay Rd Barnes Rd G arfield D r Gr egor yWayMaple RdHerodPointRdE mm e t t s L n WadingRiverRdFarmRd E OverhillRd Calverton D rBeach RdL anghorn eRdHidden Pond Path H e r mitage St LittleFl owerInsti tuteJan Way R a n d a llR dSc o tt Ave Creek Rd LineRdBrookhaven L o n g I s l a n d S o u n d APZ BUS CRBUS CR PD Def Ins Def Ins PIP Ind B OSC MRP NRP OSC NRP NRP NRP NRP NRP OSC RB40 RB80 HC RB80 RB80/Recreational Overlay District W a d i n g R i v e r M a n o r v i l l e C a l v e r t o n Sheet 2Sheet 10 2,000 Feet Zoning District Boundary Town Boundary Parcels Hamlet Boundary Town of Riverhead Zoning Map Sheet 1 of 4 Shopping CenterSC Destination Retail CenterDRC Calverton OfficeCO Business (Rural Neighborhood Business)BUS CR Business CenterBC Business (Manufacturers Outlet Center)BUS F BusinessBUS PB Commercial/Residential CampusCRC Multifamily Residential Professional OfficeMRP Tourism/Resort CampusTRC Rural CorridorRLC Village CenterVC Hamlet CenterHC Hamlet ResidentialHR Residence (Retirement Community)RC Agriculture ProtectionAPZ Residence B-80RB80 Residence A-80RA80 Residence B-40RB40 Residence A-40RA40 Planned DevelopmentPD Defense InstitutionalDef Ins Planned Recreational ParkPRP Planned Industrial ParkPIP Natural Resources ProtectionNRP Open Space ConservationOSC Riverfront CorridorRFC Peconic River CommunityPRC Downtown Center 5: ResidentialDC-5 Downtown Center 4: Office/Residential TransitionDC-4 Downtown Center 3: OfficeDC-3 Downtown Center 2: WaterfrontDC-2 Downtown Center 1: Main StreetDC-1 Light IndustrialLI Industrial CInd C Industrial BInd B Industrial AInd A HospitalH Property Lines Courtesy: Suffolk County Real Property Tax Service COPYRIGHT (C) 2021 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, N.Y. Depicted illustrations should not be considered a final agency determination. The Town of Riverhead, nor any of its agencies, makes no guarantees as to the accuracy or content of information, and is not responsible for the results of any defects or misinformation that may be found to exist. Please verify with the Town of Riverhead codes and regulations for all information and illustrations herein. Revisions: Resolution No. 236 4/4/1995 New Recreational Zoning Use District Overlay at Great Rock Golf Course Resolution No. 361 5/4/2010 Change of zone at Aquebogue Mews Resolution No. 566 8/6/2016 Change of zone at 9 Sound Road, Wading River, NY; 600-49-2-19 and 20.1 from RB-80 to HC Resolution No. 609 8/16/2016 Authorized Planned Development district Resolution No. 693 10/7/2014 Change of zone from DC-4 to DC-1 for property at 24 East Second Street, Riverhead (600-128-5-25.1) Resolution No. 853 11/15/2016 Hospital (H) Zoning District added to parcels 600-108-3-17.1 and 600-108-3-22.1 Resolution No. 2021-53 1/5/2021 Adoption of Railroad Avenue Urban Renewal Area Overlay District Railroad Ave Urban Renewal Area Overlay DistrictRRA-OD Recreational Overlay District* * SCTM No. 600-57-1-1.32 has retained the Recreational Zoning Use District Overlay that was approved by the Town Board on April 4, 1995 by resolution #236. Peconic Lake UV24 UV25 Edwards AveM o rich e s R iv e rh e a d R d Sound Ave Mill RdOld Co u n t r y R d R iv e rR d Middle Country Rd Osborn AveConnecticut AveW Ma i n S t Halse y M a n or R d Nugent Dr Splish SplashDr W oodcliff Tr lDry Saw Mill Rd KroemerAveS R i v er Rd Bea chH i l l DrCottag eRd HemlockWayLyn Ln Tanger Mall D r 6thSt3rd 7th St Hi l lCirForge Rd Woode dWayFern Rd 3rd Ave 9 t h S t8th St Park Pl Jills Way WestDr1st St South Dr Maple St Hi l l DrOak St1st AveMaryCtRose Ct Cedar Dr F o x H i l l D r La u r e l L n Park D r B l u f f s D r S P a la n e ES a ndy Ct PleasantCtC e d arR d Village Green N Village Green S Hollow C tEdwards Ave 2nd AveCanoeLake D r M a p l e R d HillRi seElm St E 1st St Peconic Field Goose Ln Karlin Dr Bayw o o d Ct 2nd StSunflowerCtOak DrRedOakCt Peconic Ter A n c h o r Path JeanCt Laura CedarSt Old Stone Rd Bl uf f sDr Carol C t Baiting Dr May D rTheFairw ay H illCre sO v e rb r o o k S tMidlan d St Marine St StevenBTangerBlvdGlen R d E 3rd AveWyl Ln Cruise St B l ack Pine S t G r e en Ash S t Grumman Blvd Pheasa n t L n Pirate St Hill St Cutlas St Alfred Ave The P r e s e r v e Honey Cente r D r 5th AveHornpi p e D r Crows N e st D r Nautic al D r H a r p e r R d T r i a n g l e Ln Atwat e r St Middlethon Ave 4th StServ i c e R d KerryWa r n e r DrBeach Way SummitDr E2ndAve5thSt Topping Pa t h 3rdStT r e a s u r e R d W i l l i a m s W ay S F l a g g H i ll Dr E 4 th Ave G o ld e n SpruceDr SouthfieldRd Tr a i l erParkRdW arner Ct Foxw o o d V lgE 5 th Ave Railro a d A v e P a l a n e S L o n gv i ewDrE a s t D r B l u ffs Dr N P a l a n e N W illia m s Way NCherry St Pi nehurstBlv dMar ge L n C l i f f Way N o r thgate Ci r LandingLn Park Rd Mastro PennyDrUnnamed StreetWildwoodDrTimberDr Zdunko Ln N ic h o la s Way ToppingsPathMiddle Rd4th AveStarr BlvdParkway DrDoeR unHighviewDrTwomey AveSouth Path E Meadow R dBai t i ngHo l l ow Ln Primrose PathNWo o d sRdJakes L n Founders Pa t h Donna D r R i l e yAveBaywood DrSilverBeechLn Reeves A v e Youngs AveOakle igh Ave M a n or Rd Deep H o l e R dFresh Pond AveHor ton Ave 495 Brookhaven Southampton L o n g I s l a n d S o u n d APZ BC BUS F PD DRC DRC DRC DRC DRC Def Ins Ind A Ind A Ind A PIP Ind B Ind C RA80 OSC OSC OSC OSC RA40 RA40 RA40 RA40 RLC RB40 HC RB40 RB80 BUS CR RFC RLC BUS CR Ind B W a d i n g R i v e r M a n o r v i l l e B a i t i n g H o l l o w C a l v e r t o n R i v e r h e a d Sheet 2Sheet 1Sheet 2Sheet 30 2,000 Feet Sheet 2 of 4 Town of Riverhead Zoning Map Revisions: Resolution No. 236 4/4/1995 New Recreational Zoning Use District Overlay at Great Rock Golf Course Resolution No. 361 5/4/2010 Change of zone at Aquebogue Mews Resolution No. 566 8/6/2016 Change of zone at 9 Sound Road, Wading River, NY; 600-49-2-19 and 20.1 from RB-80 to HC Resolution No. 609 8/16/2016 Authorized Planned Development district Resolution No. 693 10/7/2014 Change of zone from DC-4 to DC-1 for property at 24 East Second Street, Riverhead (600-128-5-25.1) Resolution No. 853 11/15/2016 Hospital (H) Zoning District added to parcels 600-108-3-17.1 and 600-108-3-22.1 Resolution No. 2021-53 1/5/2021 Adoption of Railroad Avenue Urban Renewal Area Overlay District Property Lines Courtesy: Suffolk County Real Property Tax Service COPYRIGHT (C) 2021 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, N.Y. Depicted illustrations should not be considered a final agency determination. The Town of Riverhead, nor any of its agencies, makes no guarantees as to the accuracy or content of information, and is not responsible for the results of any defects or misinformation that may be found to exist. Please verify with the Town of Riverhead codes and regulations for all information and illustrations herein. * SCTM No. 600-57-1-1.32 has retained the Recreational Zoning Use District Overlay that was approved by the Town Board on April 4, 1995 by resolution #236. Zoning District Boundary Town Boundary Parcels Hamlet Boundary Planned DevelopmentPD Defense InstitutionalDef Ins Planned Recreational ParkPRP Planned Industrial ParkPIP Natural Resources ProtectionNRP Open Space ConservationOSC Riverfront CorridorRFC Peconic River CommunityPRC Downtown Center 5: ResidentialDC-5 Downtown Center 4: Office/Residential TransitionDC-4 Downtown Center 3: OfficeDC-3 Downtown Center 2: WaterfrontDC-2 Downtown Center 1: Main StreetDC-1 Light IndustrialLI Industrial CInd C Industrial BInd B Industrial AInd A HospitalH Shopping CenterSC Destination Retail CenterDRC Calverton OfficeCO Business (Rural Neighborhood Business)BUS CR Business CenterBC Business (Manufacturers Outlet Center)BUS F BusinessBUS PB Commercial/Residential CampusCRC Multifamily Residential Professional OfficeMRP Tourism/Resort CampusTRC Rural CorridorRLC Village CenterVC Hamlet CenterHC Hamlet ResidentialHR Residence (Retirement Community)RC Agriculture ProtectionAPZ Residence B-80RB80 Residence A-80RA80 Residence B-40RB40 Residence A-40RA40 Railroad Ave Urban Renewal Area Overlay DistrictRRA-OD Recreational Overlay District* Wildwood Lake UV24 UV25 M o ric h e s R iv e rh e a d RdOs b o r n A v e Northville TpkePeconicAveEMainStCenter DrSound A v e Cross R ive r D rRoanoke Ave O l d C o u n t r y R dMi l l Rd Main Rd Hubba r d A v e F l a n d e r s RdOldQuogue RdCountyRoad94 Docto rs Pa th QuogueRi verheadRdW Main S t Lake AveElton St P ulaskiSt Center Dr SRi ver l ei ghAv e PleasureDrN u g e n t D r Mar cyAveWoodcres t AveHa r ri s o n A v e Wilson AveL udlam AveVail AveHow e l l C t Middle Co untryRdW i ll o w Pond Dr FirehouseLnTyler Dr Riverside Dr Indian Point R d FlandersBlvdGliderAveWhiteBrookDrCar lsPl S i l v e r V ill a g e B lv d Ston eleig h Dr Hampt o n H ills G o lfC c R d Y o u n g S tEast A v eRi v e r h e adLandingF OakCtG C edarP ath E Lakeview Dr Elm S t Holly Pl Sue Ln Oak St Summe r fi eldLnSEly S t L e af w o o d S t Winge dFootAlyKathy Ln NG r i f fingAveS o u th D r Kratov i l le Ave Point RdShortSt Mills PlAmenCornerPondLnPondwoodStWes t Ln Dam Trl Flora Ln Dennis Ct Nassau StMaryCtSaintJohnsPl Con s t a b le Dr Tyler S tEl ton P l Cedar Dr H e idi Behr W a y P in t a i l C t B a y b erryPathMallard Ct PloverCtA m e nC o rCarnou s tieCt1st St Polk StWintersLnPine St Park D r Nadel Ct Duane St Road B P a rk P lLois Ct Crows Nest Dr Adele CtNancyCt Cedar Cove Pine PathBay Ct Ma pl eAveN Co rwe l lAve P e c o n ic T r lJames S t 5th St Arthur S tCourt S t S o u th e r n P k w y N Howe l lAveMerritt s P o n d R d Dal y Dr J osic a LnRedl eaf CtHalloc k St Mckinley StMcdonaldPl Albany St Frankli n St Lewis St DonaldAveBrown S t SoundDr Calico Ct 1st Durye a St Nugent Dr Buck s ki n Ln MalcolmWayT re a s u r e R d OsbornAveCor we llAveLincol n St St r a wberryCommonsE Ave Ex tens ion H a ve nsDrEnterpriseZon e D rL a k eA v eBal l manCt Cliffwood St Ruth CtKirkAveAtwat e r St Ch a r le s S tSmith StInwood StIn d u strialBlvd PheasantCt Westw o o d Blvd Cove St Deepwood St L o u is e C tMcdermottAve F R d RoadDTyle r C t Laura Lak eview Ct Cutlas St O a k la n d D rN A n d reaCtJackson S t Washing tonSt Robert s St Hami l ton Ave Grant Dr H u l s e AveOst rande r AveHal le t S tSwee zyAveTer ry P l S h a d e T r e eTlpkGat zRd O a k la n d D rS W a te r v ie w Ct LoweDrJoyce D r Penins u la P a th WoodroadTrlShade T re e Ln M y sticCt O v e rb r o o k S tMidlan d St Brook S t Pi n e Gr oveStMul ber r yCommonsMarine St R o a n L n Corwin St W 2 n d S t West St A ld e r s g a t e Pirate St Gr i f fingAveMapleWood Ln M aynard A v e Woodla nd D r Bluebe r r yCo m m onsCruise St Road HChr i sCtBirc hwoo d S t Circlewo o d S t G ro v e s D rTaraLnMadiso n StBaltusr olBlv d Book er Dr Creek Rd Cen t erDrSandy Ct Mel eneSt Glynwood St Oakl andDr WCafferyCtBi rch S t P attiLn DogwoodStMo et D r Cedar S tTanglewoodSt WindwoodS t A u gus t aAlyStern AveProspec t P l H illDr Midway D r Teleph o n e Ct P h i l l i p s StDoris AveGoodridge AveJe r o me C ir S t a r Flower R o w Ospr ey Av ePenn y s Rd Railroad Ave Segal AveW e sl eyPlHoneyJeanCt Victor St Suffolk AveBell AveDelo res AveSandyHollow C tR a n d a ll S t T y t e D r Quogue AveRollingMeadow L n ChaunceyRdPo n d D rNor t hwoo dsLn Kerry Ackerl y StGreenTreeDr E 2nd St Ho well L n U n n am ed S t r e e tReeves Bay Trl BokinzA veF i shel Ext Da ly C tBrook AveMiddle Rd N adel D r Pebbl e B each Path 3rd S t Deck St Hinda Blv d Port StBel l flowerCt Sunrise Ave Anchor StPark Ave2nd S t H u n tingtonLnAlbany AveMillbrookWindflowerLnNorth er n P k w y Be l l i Av e Claus Ave 2nd J o h n sS tHobs onDr Oak Dr Arrowh e a d A v e 3rd Ri ver AveJosi eCtGrove S t U nion Ave EvergreenRdGatewood StC r a n b e r r y S tCommerc e Dr Linda L n W Cypress AveSchoolS tWildwoodTrlRabbitRunWa keRobi n L n S o u t h fi e l d s R d P a rkway St Fanning St L o n gv i ewDr Chris Sundro p C tZi onSt MapleAveSN e w R dScenicL a ke D r P r i v a t e Road F or e s t DrFan ning Blvd Silv e r b r o o k Dr Flanders Blvd SDr edgi ng Po nd R d Columbus AveOakAveF o x w oodVlgEllen St R o b inson P k w ySaddl eLakesDrSebas t i anDr Farwood St J T Blvd Fox gl o v e Ro wPeg s LnPark Rd Birch C t Goose Ne c kLnArlen Ct A n nAveH artmannsFarm Rd Grego ry P l M e a d o w L n Ki ndl i ngwo o d S tHowel l AveZdunko LnPond V iew Rd Furthe r L n Pine CtRoanoke C t Fox Run L n Kings DrOld Far m R d SandpiperDr Sanda l woodLnPhillips AveW oodhullA ve Fairw a yAvePhil l ips LnBro ad A v e L in d a L n E Lind a A v e Meadow b r o o k LnNewton AveRoanoke Ave Pebble W a ySt one c r opRdRaynor AveFishe l AveBrookhaven AveNys Conservation A r e a R dOl i ver St Riverside Ave Trout Brook Ln Priscilla Ave Ol d West hamptonRdToppingDrA Rd Dol phi nWa y Reeves Ave So und Shore Rd Hor ton Ave Brookhaven Southampton L o n g I s l a n d S o u n d Riverhead APZ BC BC BC BC BUS PB CRC CRC CRC CRC CRC DC-1 DC-2 DC-1DC-3/RRA-OD DC-3 DC-3 DC-4 DC-4 DC-5 RA40 DRC HC HC HC HR HR Ind A Ind C Ind C Ind C Ind C RA80 OSC OSC PRC PRC RA40 VC RA40 RA40 RLC RLC RA40 RA40 SC SC RC RA40 RB40 RA40 RA40 RA40 RB40 TRC BUS CR RFC DC-5 H A q u e b o g u e B a i t i n g H o l l o w C a l v e r t o n R i v e r h e a d N o r t h v i l l e D o w n t o w n R i v e r h e a d Sheet 4Sheet 3Sheet 2Sheet 30 2,000 Feet Sheet 3 of 4 Town of Riverhead Zoning Map Revisions: Resolution No. 236 4/4/1995 New Recreational Zoning Use District Overlay at Great Rock Golf Course Resolution No. 361 5/4/2010 Change of zone at Aquebogue Mews Resolution No. 566 8/6/2016 Change of zone at 9 Sound Road, Wading River, NY; 600-49-2-19 and 20.1 from RB-80 to HC Resolution No. 609 8/16/2016 Authorized Planned Development district Resolution No. 693 10/7/2014 Change of zone from DC-4 to DC-1 for property at 24 East Second Street, Riverhead (600-128-5-25.1) Resolution No. 853 11/15/2016 Hospital (H) Zoning District added to parcels 600-108-3-17.1 and 600-108-3-22.1 Resolution No. 2021-53 1/5/2021 Adoption of Railroad Avenue Urban Renewal Area Overlay District Property Lines Courtesy: Suffolk County Real Property Tax Service COPYRIGHT (C) 2021 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, N.Y. Depicted illustrations should not be considered a final agency determination. The Town of Riverhead, nor any of its agencies, makes no guarantees as to the accuracy or content of information, and is not responsible for the results of any defects or misinformation that may be found to exist. Please verify with the Town of Riverhead codes and regulations for all information and illustrations herein. * SCTM No. 600-57-1-1.32 has retained the Recreational Zoning Use District Overlay that was approved by the Town Board on April 4, 1995 by resolution #236. BC Zoning District Boundary Town Boundary Parcels Hamlet Boundary Planned DevelopmentPD Defense InstitutionalDef Ins Planned Recreational ParkPRP Planned Industrial ParkPIP Natural Resources ProtectionNRP Open Space ConservationOSC Riverfront CorridorRFC Peconic River CommunityPRC Downtown Center 5: ResidentialDC-5 Downtown Center 4: Office/Residential TransitionDC-4 Downtown Center 3: OfficeDC-3 Downtown Center 2: WaterfrontDC-2 Downtown Center 1: Main StreetDC-1 Light IndustrialLI Industrial CInd C Industrial BInd B Industrial AInd A HospitalH Shopping CenterSC Destination Retail CenterDRC Calverton OfficeCO Business (Rural Neighborhood Business)BUS CR Business CenterBC Business (Manufacturers Outlet Center)BUS F BusinessBUS PB Commercial/Residential CampusCRC Multifamily Residential Professional OfficeMRP Tourism/Resort CampusTRC Rural CorridorRLC Village CenterVC Hamlet CenterHC Hamlet ResidentialHR Residence (Retirement Community)RC Agriculture ProtectionAPZ Residence B-80RB80 Residence A-80RA80 Residence B-40RB40 Residence A-40RA40 Railroad Ave Urban Renewal Area Overlay DistrictRRA-OD Recreational Overlay District* Laurel Lake Red Creek Pond UV24 UV25 FranklinvilleR d Sound Ave S Jamesport AvePleasureDrM a i n R d P e c o n ic B a y B lv d CoxNeckRdManor Ln Flanders Rd R e d Creek Rd M e e t in gHouseCreekRdChurchLnBerge n A v e Hubb ar d A v e Edgar AveAld r ich LnEast AveFirehouseLnPh i l l ip s L n FlandersBlvdS i l v e r V ill a g e B lv d Oak St DamTrl June Run Summe r fi eldLnSKi rby LnS ound Shore Rd Ruby DrBe a c hWal kKimmel LnFre d s L n Halse y Rd Front St ShortStMills Pl Sun CtHarborRdRoadHNetz Pl W Mill Rd Tyler St R o a d C Unnamed S treet RedCedarPoi nt R d Hu lse A v e Meeting HouseCreek RdPolk St Seril Dr F RdWes t LnRitas Ct3rd St RailroadDrPeacock Ct Bay AveWa t erWa y Lover s Ln Wil bursPa thBRdR e d CedarPt Cedar Cove 4th St P e c o n ic T r lReeves Bay Trl S Apoll o Dr Hilto n Ct R Rd Cedar S t D ow n sB lvdSoundDrHenry L e w i s Ln SimeonRdCoopersR d LagoonCt 6 th S tRoad I Barrett DrD u n e Dr Maple LnLorraineCt Vinman LnBirc h AveHubbardAve Baysi d e A v e West StHubbard T r l Laure l LnTuth i l ls LnOakDr WhippoorwiilLnA RdWh it e sLnW F a i r v i ewAve Pri mr os eLnM RdSmi th Ln Grant D rBayHarbo r RdPiersonRd S h a d e T r e eTlpkT i mo t h y Ln J a c o b s P l Ziemack i LnLoweDrC lo v e r P lPoint Rd MelissaCtB a y W oodsWi l l iamson Ln Meliss a L n S u n u p T r lMcvei g h LnO Rd A delia Path Jeani e L n 2nd St Caroli n e Ct CurtisAveC o n d o r C tBigPondLnWill o w S t Green StPoint StBirchCreekRdAudr aLnCreek Rd Laur elLake RdW o o d s i d e L n GoldenleafTrlRoadDBeach Rd Priv at eRdRoad B Old Fiel d Ct Aliperti Ct Phyl l is Ln 7 th S t WoodViewWayCedar Ave Riverside Ave Del mar Dr S Jamesport AveLoc u s t S tTallTree C ir Sout hfiel dsRdTownsend AveL e g e ndLnW e s tw o o d B lv d Elm Ave RoyalAveFanningRd Wi l owski WayDunlo o ki n L n Hi ldreth RdWoodroad TrlW in d y A crsWitt L n B a y R u n Eile en Cir L e a f y Wa y SeacoveLnRollingMeadow L n ChaunceyRdPriscilla Ave Circle D r W h i t e B i r c h C t BokinzA veCedar Ct Her i t a g e L n ShadeTreeLnHol ly T ree Ln N Apoll o Dr Oak AveMoon Ave Cen t e r S t Dale Ave Farmv e uRdEa s t S t Whit e Eagl eDr K RdPi e r A v e King Ave H u ntingtonLnD u ck woodLn Nash Ave Oaks AveBe l l i Av e J o h n sS tE a g le N e s t C t Hobs onDr Ro b i n s N e s t R d D redgin g P on d R d Laurel Ave RedCreekParkP eaco c k P a th NShoreRdLaurelWay Dougs LnFoxChaserPlZi on St N e w R d F oxtrail Ct Uppe r R e d C r e e k R d D ia c h u n R d TownBeachRdMaple AveS Railroad Ave Fox L n Br o o k s i deAveLoc k i t t D r Seaman Rd Glen AveTempleAveIndianAve Sunr i seAveT a l l w o o d L n Tuts Ln Fern Ave H a l l o c k L n P riv ate Dr Laurelw o o d D r June Ave R i v e rside Dr Wind s Wa y Sylvan AveIda Ln Hart Ave S m u gglersP ath Pine Ave Harve st L n Pro me na de Dr Fantasy D r W A p o llo D r Mor ni ngsi deAveHe r r i c k s L nGatheringR ocksRdS to llDr C lairdale D rHighMeadowLnSylvan Ave NRosewo od Dr N Rai lr oa d Av e K r is tin a L n W i l d D u c k L n L a ur e l Lak e Dr NOa k wo odRdV i s t a C tWashing ton AveBrea kwa t e r RdCrysta l D rCol oni al DrIn d i a n P o i n t R d Sain t Ma rys D r A r bor Ln Vi neyardWay Ove r lo o k Dr Ki r kupLnAld r ic h L n E x te n s io n Southampton Southold L o n g I s l a n d S o u n d APZ HC HC HC HR HR RA80 RA40 RLC RLC VC RA40 TRC RB40 RB80 RLC VC RLC RLC RLC RB40 RB80 RB80 RB40 A q u e b o g u e R i v e r h e a d N o r t h v i l l e L a u r e l J a m e s p o r t S o u t h J a m e s p o r tSheet 4Sheet 30 2,000 Feet Sheet 4 of 4 Town of Riverhead Zoning Map Revisions: Resolution No. 236 4/4/1995 New Recreational Zoning Use District Overlay at Great Rock Golf Course Resolution No. 361 5/4/2010 Change of zone at Aquebogue Mews Resolution No. 566 8/6/2016 Change of zone at 9 Sound Road, Wading River, NY; 600-49-2-19 and 20.1 from RB-80 to HC Resolution No. 609 8/16/2016 Authorized Planned Development district Resolution No. 693 10/7/2014 Change of zone from DC-4 to DC-1 for property at 24 East Second Street, Riverhead (600-128-5-25.1) Resolution No. 853 11/15/2016 Hospital (H) Zoning District added to parcels 600-108-3-17.1 and 600-108-3-22.1 Resolution No. 2021-53 1/5/2021 Adoption of Railroad Avenue Urban Renewal Area Overlay District Property Lines Courtesy: Suffolk County Real Property Tax Service COPYRIGHT (C) 2021 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, N.Y. Depicted illustrations should not be considered a final agency determination. The Town of Riverhead, nor any of its agencies, makes no guarantees as to the accuracy or content of information, and is not responsible for the results of any defects or misinformation that may be found to exist. Please verify with the Town of Riverhead codes and regulations for all information and illustrations herein. * SCTM No. 600-57-1-1.32 has retained the Recreational Zoning Use District Overlay that was approved by the Town Board on April 4, 1995 by resolution #236. Zoning District Boundary Town Boundary Parcels Hamlet Boundary Planned DevelopmentPD Defense InstitutionalDef Ins Planned Recreational ParkPRP Planned Industrial ParkPIP Natural Resources ProtectionNRP Open Space ConservationOSC Riverfront CorridorRFC Peconic River CommunityPRC Downtown Center 5: ResidentialDC-5 Downtown Center 4: Office/Residential TransitionDC-4 Downtown Center 3: OfficeDC-3 Downtown Center 2: WaterfrontDC-2 Downtown Center 1: Main StreetDC-1 Light IndustrialLI Industrial CInd C Industrial BInd B Industrial AInd A HospitalH Shopping CenterSC Destination Retail CenterDRC Calverton OfficeCO Business (Rural Neighborhood Business)BUS CR Business CenterBC Business (Manufacturers Outlet Center)BUS F BusinessBUS PB Commercial/Residential CampusCRC Multifamily Residential Professional OfficeMRP Tourism/Resort CampusTRC Rural CorridorRLC Village CenterVC Hamlet CenterHC Hamlet ResidentialHR Residence (Retirement Community)RC Agriculture ProtectionAPZ Residence B-80RB80 Residence A-80RA80 Residence B-40RB40 Residence A-40RA40 Railroad Ave Urban Renewal Area Overlay DistrictRRA-OD Recreational Overlay District* FINAL DRAFT – 8/16/19 1 TOWN OF SALISBURY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ZONING REGULATION TEXT AMENDMENTS FINAL DRAFT – 8/16/19 Be it enacted by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Salisbury that the Zoning Regulations are amended as follows: SECTION 1: LEGISLATIVE INTENT The Town of Salisbury Planning and Zoning Commission finds that multi-family housing for long- term residential use is a community need. The purpose of these amendments is to promote a diversity of housing stock to meet the changing housing needs of all residents, to retain seniors, to provide a housing resource for people employed in the community who cannot afford to live here, and to attract new younger families and professionals. The amendments are also intended to encourage housing opportunities and promote housing choice in accordance with Connecticut General Statutes. SECTION 2: AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN OF SALISBURY CONNECTICUT Article II “Zones, Districts, Maps and Use Requirements,” Section 201, “Overlay Districts” is hereby amended in part to add the following: ZONES ZONING MAP LEGEND Multi-Family Housing Overlay District MFH Pocketknife Square Overlay District PKSQ Article II “Zones, Districts, Maps and Use Requirements,” Section 203, “Overlay District Maps” is hereby amended in part to add: e. The Multi-Family Housing Overlay District Zone Map dated ____, as amended. Article II “Zones, Districts, Maps and Use Requirements,” Section 208, “Additional Requirements for Certain Accessory Uses, Buildings and Structures in Residential Zones” is hereby amended in part as follows: 208.1 Apartment on Single Family Residential Lot a. Statement of Purpose. The purpose of this regulation is to broaden the options for moderate cost housing a variety of housing types by permitting an apartment associated with a single family owner occupied residence and lot. The Commission finds that such apartments are an FINAL DRAFT – 8/16/19 2 expeditious option for the creation of much needed, low impact, moderate cost housing units, which can be dispersed within the community, that such apartments often require modest construction modifications and such improvements can readily blend into existing residential neighborhoods, and that an apartment in an accessory structure, such as a garage or barn, further expands new housing opportunities while avoiding the need to alter existing homes. b. General. An apartment may be permitted within an existing or proposed single-family dwelling subject to Site Plan approval. and a An apartment in an approved accessory building associated with a single family dwelling may be permitted subject to approval of a Special Permit provided only one apartment is permitted on a lot and the site plan and proposed improvements are designed to maintain residential appearance and character on the lot. c. Owner Occupied. The applicant shall be the owner of the lot. and the lot owner or parent, spouse or child of the lot owner shall reside in either the principal dwelling or the apartment unit. The applicant, or their family member, shall reside in either the principal dwelling or the apartment unit. d. Apartment Floor Area. The minimum floor area for an apartment in a principal dwelling or in an accessory building shall be 350 square feet or the minimum required by the State Building Code, as revised, whichever is less. The maximum floor area of an apartment in an accessory building shall be 2,000 square feet. or 60% of the total floor area of the principal dwelling, whichever is less. e. Location and Design. Additions to existing structures or new construction requires submission of elevations of the structure exterior for review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. If the building is located within a Historic District, in accordance with Salisbury Historic District Commission (SHDC) policies and procedures, an application shall be made to SHDC in advance of seeking planning, zoning, and building approvals. Additions to an existing dwelling shall: • Provide no more than one entrance visible from the front yard and • Have a scale and exterior appearance that blends with and maintains the appearance of the dwelling as a single-family residence. f. Apartment in an Accessory Structure. Additions or modifications to an existing accessory structure or construction of a new accessory structure for purposes of creating an apartment shall be designed in a manner consistent with the residential character of the neighborhood. to appear more like an accessory structure than a residential dwelling in terms of exterior features. An accessory building constructed after July 13, 2003 and proposed for apartment use shall meet the yard requirements for a principal dwelling. Where determined necessary to protect neighboring property values, privacy or to shield lighting or parking, the Commission may require a landscape screen between the accessory building and neighboring property line(s). g. Off-Street Parking. A minimum of three off-street parking spaces shall be required. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 703, “Parking and Loading FINAL DRAFT – 8/16/19 3 Requirements.” Wherever possible, parking for the apartment shall be located to the rear or side of the dwelling or accessory building. The Commission may require that new parking space(s) in view from a street be screened from public view. h. Access. The apartment shall have its own outside access to the parking area and shall be equipped with its own kitchen, bath and utility services that conform to the list of minimum utility and installation requirements specified on the Zoning Application Form. i. Sewage. For a lot with an on-site septic system the Torrington Area Health District (TAHD) Regional Health District shall certify that the existing system or the proposed modified or new subsurface sewage disposal system is adequate to serve the proposed additional use. Article II “Zones, Districts, Maps and Use Requirements,” Section 209, “Additional Requirements for Uses in Residential Zones” is hereby amended in part as follows: The general standards and requirements for Zoning Permit, Site Plan or Special Permits apply to the uses listed on the above 205.1 Table of Uses Permitted in Residential Zones. The following additional requirements shall also apply. 209.1 New Construction Multi-Family Dwelling New construction Mmulti-family dwellings of two but not more than three dwelling units shall be permitted provided all regulations as to lot size, setbacks, density, parking and other requirements for the zone are met.; except that within the Multi-Family Housing and Pocketknife Square Overlay Districts, the lot size, setbacks, density, and other dimensional regulations of the respective overlay district shall apply. A lot for a multi-family dwelling shall have a minimum square of 100 feet on each side. 209.2 Conversion of Existing Residence Structure to Multi-Family Dwelling a. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to enhance provide additional housing opportunities in village center areas by allowing subject to a Special Permit an existing structure residence served by public sewer to be converted to a multi-family dwelling. of not more than three dwelling units provided such conversion will not alter the single family residential appearance of the dwelling. The floor area of any dwelling unit within the existing structure shall be consistent with the minimum square feet required by the State Building Code, and in no case shall be less than 350 square feet. For properties not within the MFH or PKSQ Overlay Districts, the maximum number of dwelling units shall be three. b. Owner-Family Resident. The lot owner or a parent, spouse or child of the lot owner shall reside on the property. b. Existing Building. Only a structure existing at the time of the adoption of this section is eligible for conversion to a multi-family dwelling under this section. Structures that are dimensionally pre-existing non-conforming are eligible for conversion to a multi-family FINAL DRAFT – 8/16/19 4 dwelling. New appurtenances or additions necessary for access or safety that would not increase the non-conformity may be permitted subject to Special Permit review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. c. Existing Building, Water and Sewer Service. Only a residence existing at the time of the application is eligible for conversion to a multi-family dwelling under this section. The residence multi-family dwelling shall be served by either the public sewer system provided the applicant shall submit evidence that the additional sewer volume resulting from the proposed conversion meets the requirements of the Water Pollution Control Authority or by a septic system provided the applicant shall submit evidence that the existing or proposed modified system meets the requirements of the Torrington Area Health District Regional Health District. The residence multi-family dwelling shall be served by the public water system or the applicant shall present certification from the Torrington Area Health District Regional Health District that the existing or proposed well is adequate to serve the proposed use. d. Building Design, Scale and Proportion. Proposed additions and modifications to the existing building may be permitted provided such changes are consistent with scale, height, proportions and character of the existing building and the neighborhood. Any modifications for fire safety or access, such as fire escapes and elevator shafts shall be located on the side or rear of the building. If the building is located within a Historic District, in accordance with Salisbury Historic District Commission (SHDC) policies and procedures, an application shall be made to SHDC in advance of seeking planning, zoning and building approvals. e. Other External Elements. All materials, construction, lighting, signs and other external elements of the building and on the site shall be compatible with the character of the neighborhood, and the rural and historic character of the Town. Signs shall be in accordance with Section 704, “Signs,” of this Section. f. Parking. The lot shall be large enough to accommodate any needed new off street parking space. A minimum of five parking spaces shall be provided for a residence converted to three dwelling units. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 703, “Parking and Loading Requirements.” No new parking areas shall be created in between the front façade of the structure residence and the street. New parking spaces may be created to the side and rear of the residence. Landscaping or screening may shall be required where needed to shield the view of parking areas from the street and neighboring residences. 209.3 [Reserved] Affordable Multi-Family Housing Sponsored by the Town of Salisbury or a Non-Profit Organization a. Affordable multi-family housing sponsored by the Town of Salisbury or a non-profit organization as hereinafter described may be permitted subject to the standards, conditions and requirements of this section. FINAL DRAFT – 8/16/19 5 b. The Commission shall in its decision issue a finding on the record that there is a need for such housing in the Town of Salisbury, the proposed plan meets all relevant requirements of public health, safety and off-street parking and provides an opportunity for affordable, multi- family housing sponsored by an eligible applicant as herein prescribed. c. The proposed plan may include a maximum of 20% of the total housing units as market priced units where the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Commission that such market priced units are necessary to support a viable financial, construction and operational plan. d. Locations for such housing are preferably, but not necessarily, in existing buildings near village centers and on public sewer and water lines. e. Eligible applicants are limited to the Town of Salisbury, OR • A community housing development corporation meeting all of the requirements of general statutes Sec. 8-217, as amended, OR • An organization which has been verified by the Board of Selectmen as a non-profit (for federal tax purposes) and as an entity capable of constructing and operating the proposed affordable multi-family housing project; provided however, that such certifications may be made by action of a Town meeting in lieu of certification by the Board of Selectmen. f. For a site served by Town sewer and water, the maximum density shall be eight (8) dwelling units per acre with the following exception. A greater number of units may be permitted per acre provided the total number of bedrooms per acre is not more than 16. For a site not served by Town sewer and water the maximum density shall be no more than the number of dwelling units that can be served by an on-site septic system(s) meeting the requirements of the State Health Code as administered by the State of Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection or the Torrington Area Health District, but in no event shall be more than eight (8) units per acre. g. For an existing building with a proposed addition equal to 10% or less of the existing total floor area the maximum number of dwelling units per building shall be eight (8). For a new building, or existing buildings requiring an addition of more than 10% of the existing total floor area, the maximum number of dwelling units shall be six (6). An associated community building may be permitted as an accessory structure to the dwelling units. h. A minimum one acre lot shall be required for new construction of dwelling units. Projects utilizing only existing building(s) for the dwelling units may be permitted on an existing lot provided that parking and health requirements are met. i. Each dwelling unit shall have 1.5 spaces of off-street parking on the lot. j. Proper screening shall be provided where required by the Commission. FINAL DRAFT – 8/16/19 6 Article II “Zones, Districts, Maps and Use Requirements,” Section 222.1, “Village Center Commercial Zones (C-20, CG-20)” is hereby amended in part as follows: 222.1 Village Center Commercial Zones (C-20, CG-20) The primary purpose of these zones is to provide centralized, compact areas for local and area retail, office, business and specialized uses and services, accessory residential, and associated parking, pedestrian circulation and landscaping. The requirements for these districts are aimed at maintaining the historic rural New England character of the Salisbury and Lakeville village centers. Residential uses are intended to be supportive of the commercial uses and, where feasible, should be located above the first floor when located in a prime retail or restaurant corridor. Article II “Zones, Districts, Maps and Use Requirements,” Section 224.6, “Apartment in Business Building” is hereby amended in part as follows: 224.6 Apartment in Business Building Multi-Family Dwelling a. The purpose of this use is to broaden the options for housing opportunities in village centers. This use is allowed in a business or commercial building subject to the same requirements as Residential Zones (see Section 209). and to offer owners of business buildings the option of utilizing upper floor space for apartment use. b. This use is allowed in a business or commercial building located in a C-20 or CG-20 zone. c. The Site Plan and floor plan shall show that the proposed apartment is located on an upper floor with a minimum floor area of 350 square feet. Article II “Zones, Districts, Maps and Use Requirements,” Section 224.7 “Other Residential Related Uses” is hereby amended in part as follows: 224.7 Other Residential Related Uses The additional requirements for the following uses, where permitted in a Commercial or Industrial Zone, shall be the same as the additional requirements for residential uses. • Single family with accessory apartment • Multi-family dwelling • Conversion to multi-family dwelling • Town or non-profit affordable housing Article IV- Overlay Districts – Standards and Requirements, “Section 400 “General” is hereby amended in part as follows: FINAL DRAFT – 8/16/19 7 The following are the standards and requirements for the Overlay Districts as shown on the Zoning map and the various Overlay District maps on file in the Planning and Zoning Office. The standards and requirements for these Overlay Districts are in addition to the requirements of the underlying zone. Where the requirements of the Overlay District are more restrictive than the underlying Zone, the more restrictive requirement shall apply. The Overlay Districts are: Flood Plain Overlay District (FP) Housatonic River Overlay District (HR) Aquifer Protection Overlay District (AP) Lake Protection Overlay District (LP) Multi-Family Housing Overlay District (MFH) Pocketknife Square Overlay District (PKSQ) Article IV- Overlay Districts – Standards and Requirements, is hereby amended to add a new Section 405 “Multi-Family Housing and Pocketknife Square Overlay Districts” as follows: 405 Multi-Family Housing and Pocketknife Square Overlay Districts 405.1 Statement of Purpose The Town of Salisbury finds that multi-family housing for long-term residential use is a community need. The Multi-Family Housing and Pocketknife Square Overlay Districts promote a diversity of housing stock to meet the changing housing needs of all residents. These overlay districts facilitate the development of a variety of housing choices that would appeal to seniors, families, and those employed in the community. The Multi-Family Housing and Pocketknife Square Overlay Districts provide flexibility within the context of the Town’s zoning ordinance to encourage the development of multi-family housing to meet these community needs. The Multi-Family Housing Overlay District is mapped within the existing village centers and to undeveloped or underdeveloped parcels with access to public sewer adjacent to the village centers. Upon a petition to the Planning and Zoning Commission to amend the zoning map in accordance with Section 911 of the Zoning Regulations of the Town of Salisbury, the Multi-Family Housing Overlay District may be extended for the purpose of constructing multi-family housing outside the village center. The Pocketknife Square Overlay District is mapped to the parcels within the immediate vicinity of Pocketknife Square, and promotes the adaptive re-use of existing structures and contextual redevelopment. 405.2 Definitions For the purpose of this section the following terms shall be defined as follows: AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNIT. A housing unit that is affordable to a household whose income does not exceed 80% of the area median income (AMI) for Litchfield County or the State of Connecticut, whichever is less, as defined annually by the U.S. Department of FINAL DRAFT – 8/16/19 8 Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and for which the annual housing cost of a unit including: common charges; principal, interest, taxes and insurance (PITI), as applicable; and tenant paid utilities on a rental unit; does not exceed 30% of 80% AMI, adjusted for family size. Affordable housing units shall be deed restricted for use as affordable housing for a minimum of 50 years. COMMUNITY AMENITIES. Customary accessory residential amenities intended for use by residents of the development, including but not limited to playscapes, fitness centers, community recreation rooms, gardens, walking trails, outdoor exercise equipment, swimming pools, and sport courts. DENSITY BONUS. An incentive-based zoning tool that permits an increase in the maximum allowable development on a property in exchange for achieving a stated public policy goal. STREET WALL. A street wall is a line of building facades that maintain a consistent front yard setback and minimal side yard setbacks thus forming a “wall.” 405.3 Permitted Uses Within the Multi-Family Housing and Pocketknife Square Overlay Districts, new construction multi-family housing shall be permitted as a Special Permit use. Conversion to multi-family dwellings shall be permitted in accordance with Section 209.2. 405.4 MFH Overlay District Density The determination of the permitted number of new construction dwellings, lot size and related bulk requirements for the MFH Overlay District shall be as follows: a. General purpose. The permitted number of dwellings for a multi-family development is equal to the net buildable area of the site multiplied by the density factors assigned for each overlay district. The site capacity calculation provides the mechanism for subtracting from the base site area all portions of a site considered inappropriate for the development. Consequently, the purpose of this section is to determine the extent to which a site may be utilized given its unique characteristics. b. Calculation of base site area. The base site area shall be determined as follows: Calculation of Base Site Area 1. Gross site area as determined by actual on-site survey acres 2. Subtract land constituting roads and land within rights-of-way of existing roads, rights-of-way of utilities and easements of access and land with deed restrictions prohibiting building or development acres 3. Equals base site area = acres c. Calculation of site resource protection land. All land area consisting of the natural resources or natural features listed below shall be measured. The total acreage of each FINAL DRAFT – 8/16/19 9 resource shall be multiplied by its respective open space ratio to determine the amount of resource protection land or area required to be kept in open space to protect the resource or feature. The sum total of all resource protection land on the site equals the total resource protection land on the site. It should be noted that certain categories may overlap and are not intended to be duplicated. Resource or Feature Open Space Ratio (A) Acres in Resource (B) Total land in Resource (A * B) Lakes, ponds and watercourses 1.0 Wetlands 1.0 Floodplains 1.0 Moderate slopes (15% to 25%) 0.5 Steep slopes (25% or greater) 1.0 Total land in resource = -- d. Determination of site capacity. Individual site capacity is determined by calculating the net buildable site area. For multi-family developments, the number of dwelling units permitted is determined by multiplying the density factor for each overlay district by the net buildable area. The calculations are as follows: Determination of Site Capacity 1. Total base site area acres 2. Subtract total land in resource acres 3. Equals net building site area acres 4. Multiply by maximum density factor x acres 5. Multiply by density bonus factor (if provided) x acres 6. Equals number of dwellings (round off) e. Density factors. 1. Density factors for the MFH Overlay District. The maximum density factors to be used in the previous calculation shall be as follows: District Maximum Density Factor MFH 4 2. A bonus density factor of four (4) may be applied at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Commission for the provision of affordable housing where a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the units are affordable as defined herein. FINAL DRAFT – 8/16/19 10 FINAL DRAFT – 8/16/19 11 f. Protection of natural resources. 1. New dwelling units or other site development shall be located away from identified resources listed in this section to the maximum extent practicable. Driveways providing access to a property are exempt from this provision, provided that construction of a driveway will not result in significant adverse environmental impacts, and provided that no alternative configuration that avoids protected resources is available. The Planning and Zoning Commission, in its review of the special permit applications may require modifications to the plans to minimize the potential for impact to any of the resources listed in this section. 405.5 PKSQ Overlay District Density Within the PKSQ Overlay District the maximum density shall be sixteen (16) dwelling units per acre with the following exception: where a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the units are affordable housing, a greater number of units may be permitted per acre provided the minimum unit size shall be 350 square feet or the minimum required by the State Building Code, whichever is less. 405.6 Design Requirements Applicable to Multi-Family Development within the Multi- Family Housing and Pocketknife Square Overlay Districts a. Dimensional Requirements. Except as specified herein, the minimum yard setbacks, maximum building coverage, and maximum building height of the underlying zoning district shall apply to new construction multi-family housing developments within the MFH and PKSQ overlay districts. 1. The maximum building height shall be 40 feet if necessary to accommodate a third floor plus a gabled, hipped, or pitched roof consistent with community character. 2. The front yard setback shall conform to the underlying zoning district, or shall match the existing front yard setback of one or more buildings on abutting properties to maintain the existing street wall. The purpose of this provision is to maintain a predictability of design within the Village centers. 3. The maximum building coverage shall be 50 percent in the MFH Overlay District and 75 percent in the PKSQ Overlay District. 4. The minimum side yard setback within the PKSQ Overlay District shall be 6 feet. 5. The minimum rear yard setback within the PKSQ Overlay District shall be 10 feet. 6. The minimum side yard setback within the MFH Overlay District shall be 50 percent of that required in the underlying zoning district. 7. The minimum rear yard setback within the MFH Overlay District shall be 50 percent of that required in the underlying zoning district. FINAL DRAFT – 8/16/19 12 b. Building Design, Scale and Proportion. All development shall be contextual in character. New construction shall be of a height, bulk, and design that complements the existing character of the neighborhood and community. If the site proposed for new multi-family construction is located within a Historic District, in accordance with Salisbury Historic District Commission (SHDC) policies and procedures, an application shall be made to SHDC in advance of seeking building and zoning approvals. The following design elements shall be considered: 1. Buildings facades shall be massed and scaled to present a varied appearance at street level, and shall be designed to give individual identity to each unit or section of units. 2. The design shall consider the spacing and proportion of window and door openings, bays or other aspects of building fenestration, as well as colors, textures and the general nature of exterior materials and treatment, including building ornament and trim. 3. Blank wall exposures shall be limited. 4. The design shall consider variation in roof heights, use of pitched roofs, and other roof elements such as cross gables and dormer windows to provide visual interest and to reduce the scale of the building. 5. All multi-family buildings shall comply with all applicable building and fire code regulations. c. Sewer. The proposed development shall be served by the public sewer system or an on- site system compliant with the requirements of the State Health Code as administered by the State of Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection or the Torrington Area Health District. For developments connecting to the public sewer, the applicant shall submit evidence that the additional sewer volume resulting from the proposed project meets the requirements of the Water Pollution Control Authority. d. Water. The proposed development shall be served by the public water system or the applicant shall present certification from the Torrington Area Health District that the existing or proposed well is adequate to serve the proposed use. e. Parking. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 703, “Parking and Loading Requirements.” No new parking areas shall be created in between the front façade of the residence and the street. New parking spaces may be created to the side and rear of the residence. Landscaping or screening shall be required where needed to shield the view of parking areas from the street and adjacent properties. Shared and satellite parking is permitted in accordance with Section 703 of this Section. f. Landscaping and Screening. A Landscape Plan consistent with the requirements of §701 shall be provided. The Commission may require screening around parking, refuse, and community amenity areas. g. Lighting. A Lighting Plan consistent with the requirements of §702 shall be provided. All onsite lighting shall be of a residential character and scale. All lighting shall be dark-sky compliant. The maximum light levels on the property shall not exceed 5 footcandles. FINAL DRAFT – 8/16/19 13 h. Other External Elements. All materials, construction, signs and other external elements of the building and on the site shall be compatible with the character of the neighborhood, and the rural and historic character of the Town. i. Accessibility. All new construction developments shall include units accessible and adaptable to individuals with disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). 405.7 Procedure a. Application for a Special Permit shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission in accordance with Article VIII- Site Plans and Special Permits – Application Requirements, Standards and Procedures of this Section. b. Affordable Housing Program. a. Each project that includes affordable housing shall be required to define the selection criteria and process for ensuring compliance with the affordable housing eligibility requirements and long-term maintenance and monitoring of the development for such compliance. b. The applicant shall identify an organization, group or company who shall ensure compliance with the affordable eligibility requirements for the project. As part of the Special Permit approval process, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall refer the organization, group, or company to the Salisbury Affordable Housing Commission for a report and recommendation on the suitability of the organization, group, or company’s suitability to ensure compliance with the affordable housing program. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall request the Salisbury Affordable Housing Commission issue a report and recommendation within 60 days of receipt of the referral. Based on the report and recommendation, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall have the authority to approve or disapprove of the organization, group, or company that shall ensure compliance with the eligibility requirements for the project. If no report or recommendation is received within 60 days, the Planning and Zoning Commission may assume that the Salisbury Affordable Housing Commission has no objections thereto. Table 205.1 – “TABLE OF USES – Residential Zones”, is hereby amended in part as follows: R-10 R-20 RR-1 RR-1V RR-3 MR Multi-family dwelling Special Permit Special Permit Special Permit Special Permit Special Permit Not Permitted Town or non-profit affordable housing Special Permit Special Permit Special Permit Special Permit Special Permit Not Permitted FINAL DRAFT – 8/16/19 14 Table 205.2 – “TABLE OF USES – Rural Enterprise; Commercial & Industrial Zones,” is hereby amended in part as follows: RE C-20 CG-20 LI-1 Apartment in a business building Not Permitted Special Permit Special Permit Not Permitted Multi-family dwelling Special Permit Special Permit Special Permit Not Permitted Special Permit Town or non-profit affordable housing Special Permit Not Permitted Not Permitted Not Permitted Table 703.11 “Table of Parking Requirements” is hereby amended in part as follows: Multi-Family Dwelling 1 For One Bedroom Unit, 2 Per Unit with More than One Bedroom 1 Per Unit Town or Non-Profit Affordable Housing See Article VII, 703 Appendix – Definitions is hereby amended to add the following definitions: AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNIT. A housing unit that is affordable to a household whose income does not exceed 80% of the area median income (AMI) for Litchfield County or the State of Connecticut, whichever is less, as defined annually by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and for which the annual housing cost of a unit including: common charges; principal, interest, taxes and insurance (PITI), as applicable; and tenant paid utilities on a rental unit; does not exceed 30% of 80% AMI, adjusted for family size. Affordable housing units shall be deed restricted for use as affordable housing for a minimum of 50 years. COMMUNITY AMENITIES. Customary accessory residential amenities intended for use by residents of the development, including but not limited to playscapes, gardens, walking trails, outdoor exercise equipment, swimming pools, and sport courts. DENSITY BONUS. An incentive-based zoning tool that permits an increase in the maximum allowable development on a property in exchange for achieving a stated public policy goal. STREET WALL. A street wall is a line of building facades that maintain a consistent front yard setback and minimal side yard setbacks thus forming a “wall.” !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!! !!!! !!!! !!!! !!!! !!!! !!!! !!!!Factory Broo k B u r t o n B r o o k 41 112 §¨¦44 R-20 R-10 LA R-10 CG-20 C-20 R-10RR-1V C-20 CG-20 LI-1 R-20 RR-1 Int e r l a k e n R d ElmStEthan All e n St Woodland DrLincoln C i t y R d Hol l ey St Clevelan d S tBelgo Rd Wel l s H i l l R d Walton St Farnum RdSharon RdRidge Ln Pr o s p e c t S t BrookSt MeadowSt Bostwick St Ha r ri s o n L n Farnum RdPerry StBiss e l l S t East StOrchardSt La k e v i e w A v e U p p e r R d Brisco Rd Spruce D r Pettee S t LedgewoodRdP o r t e r S t Burton Rd B u r t o n Rd UplandMeadowRd W o n o n s c o p o m u c L a k e 0 1,000 FEET14.10.19Lakeville Village Zoning MapSource: Appalachian Trail Conservancy, 2014; CT DEEP, 1984, 1999, 2012, 2016; ESRI, 2012; Town of Salisbury, 2007, 2014Pocketknife Square Overlay MFH Overlay RR-1V – Rural Residence 1 Village !!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! RR-1 – Rural Residence 1 R-20 – Residence 20 !!!!!!! !!!!!!! !!!!!!! !!!!!!! R-10 – Residence 10!!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! LI-1 – Industrial 1 LA – Lakeside CG-20 – General Commercial C-20 – Commercial Zoning Unpaved or Minor Local State Roads Water Wetland River or Stream Waterbodies Tax Lot Lines Lake Protection Zone Protected Lands Railbed TOWN OF SALISBURY, CONNECTICUT Sewage Treatment Plant !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! CG-20 C-20 R-20 RR-1 RR-3 RR-1V 41 §¨¦44 §¨¦44 Cobble Rd Library S t Academy St Library S tUnderMountainRd Sa lmon K i l l RdRailroad StFowler St IndianCaveRdSelleck Hill RdCobble RdC o n klin St The L o c k U p Grove St E c h o S t Factory StLocust StF a c t o r y B ro o kWa c h o c a s t i n ook Creek S p r u c e S w a mp Cr e e k 0 1,000 FEET14.10.19Salisbury Village Zoning MapSource: Appalachian Trail Conservancy, 2014; CT DEEP, 1984, 1999, 2012, 2016; ESRI, 2012; Town of Salisbury, 2007, 2014Appalachian Trail Railbed Protected Lands Tax Lot Lines Waterbodies River or Stream Wetland Water Roads State Local Unpaved or Minor Zoning C-20 – Commercial CG-20 – General Commercial !!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! R-20 – Residence 20 RR-1 – Rural Residence 1 !!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! RR-1V – Rural Residence 1 Village !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!!RR-3 – Rural Residence 3 MFH Overlay TOWN OF SALISBURY, CONNECTICUT Town of Southeast, New York Adopted April 22, 2021 Route 22 Master Plan Table of Contents A. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 B. The Vision for Route 22 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 C. Analysis of Existing Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 D. The Master Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 E. Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 A . Introduction Route 22 is a gateway to the Town of Southeast and a major north-south transportation corridor within the Hudson Valley Region. This document is the updated Town of Southeast Route 22 Master Plan, which is an addendum to the Town’s 2014 Comprehensive Plan Update. In 2007, the Town of Southeast adopted the first Route 22 Master Plan and associated zoning. The 2007 plan primarily focused on the land bordering Route 22 from Clocktower Commons in the south to the intersection with Route 312 in the north. The vision at the time was to create a new town center. However for a number of reasons—such as changes to New York State Department of Environmental Conservation’s wetland map, the Great Recession, lack of sewer infrastructure, poor soils for subsurface on-site wastewater treatment, and a shift in public opinion towards revitalizing the Village of Brewster rather than creating a new down- town—this plan was never fully realized. Route 22 remains a vital north south corridor for retail and other commercial uses within the limits of the Town of Southeast. There are also several large vacant and underutilized properties within this corridor. Thirteen years have passed since the Route 22 Master Plan was adopted, and it has been six years since the Town undertook a focused update to the overall Comprehensive Plan. As such, a new look at the Route 22 corridor was warranted. This Route 22 Master Plan considers the following areas of analysis: • Existing development and land uses; • Changes in economic and demographic conditions; • Environmental conditions (e.g. wetlands); • Water and sanitary sewer infrastructure; and • Traffic and transportation. This Master Plan establishes a long-term vision for the Route 22 corridor and is intended to serve as a “blueprint” for future development along Route 22. The Master Plan establishes criteria and design guidelines for the location, design, and orientation of pedestrian improvements, landscaping, stormwater management, and bike and vehicular infrastructure. The Study Area The Master Plan process evaluated the Route 22 corridor in three sections: Section 1: End of I-684 to Clocktower Commons Section 2: Clocktower Commons to Brewster Towne Centre Section 3: Brewster Towne Centre to Town of Patterson (including Old Doansburg Road) 2 Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan The Process The Town of Southeast Planning Board spearheaded the development of the Master Plan, with assistance from its consultant, AKRF, Inc. In light of the COVID-19 Pandemic, the initial public outreach for the Route 22 Master Plan was conducted via web-blasts, social media, and targeted emails to local property owners, developers, architects, engineers, and land use attorneys. In addition, conference calls were held with representatives from New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP) and New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) to gather information on pending projects, policy changes, and other information relevant to future development along the corridor. Demographic and economic trends information was obtained from the US Census and Esri, a Geographic Information Science (GIS) company. In addition, an online survey was conducted to solicit input from residents, businesses, and other interested parties on their vision for the future of Route 22 corridor from the end of I-684 to the Patterson town line. The survey was available to the public online from August 3, 2020, to September 18, 2020. During this time, the survey received 397 responses, of which 339 were from Town of Southeast residents and 22 were from Town of Southeast business or commercial property owners on Route 22 (see Appendix A). Public participation was an integral part of the preparation of the Route 22 Master Plan. AKRF, Inc. presented an overview of the Route 22 Master Plan process, the survey findings, and an overview of Section 1 at a public meeting on September 28, 2020. Section 2 was presented at a public meeting on October 25, 2020, and Section 3 was presented on November 9, 2020. A summary of the discussions and recommendations was presented on November 23, 2020. At each of these public meetings, the public was given the opportunity to ask questions and comment on the discussion and presentation. In accordance with New York State Town Law §272-a(6), the draft Route 22 Master Plan was presented and discussed at a public hearing on January 11, 2020. Based on public comment received at the public hearing, revi- sions were made and presented to the Planning Board on January 25, 2021. The Planning Board referred the document to the Town Board on February 8, 2021, and the Town Board held its own public hearing on March 18, 2021, with a written comment period held until March 29, 2021. This document incorporates all public comment on the Route 22 Master Plan, from all public hearings as well as all written comments received by the Town. Environmental analysis of the policies and implementa- tion measures included in the plan is included as an integral part of the Route 22 Master Plan. To comply with the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), a Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) was prepared on April 7, 2021. The Town Board declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on April 22, 2021. B. The Vision for Route 22 Route 22 is a vital north south corridor for retail and other commercial uses within the limits of the Town of Southeast. Future development on this corridor should be visually appealing, serve the local community, and improve pedestrian, bike, and vehicular infrastructure. New commercial and retail uses are encouraged, particularly those that cater to the recreation and entertainment needs of local families. Mixed-use commercial, including live-work communities, senior housing, and service-oriented businesses such as day-care, dog boarding, and specialty food services are desired. Overall, the Town of Southeast seeks to balance a healthy economic environment with quality of life infrastructure improvements that benefit both the Town’s residents and commercial businesses. 3Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan C. Analysis of Existing Conditions Existing Development and Land Uses The Master Plan considered the Route 22 Corridor in three distinct sections and established a vision for each: Section 1: End of I-684 to Clocktower Commons I-684 transitions to Route 22 over the spillway of the East Branch Reservoir. From the spillway to Milltown Road, Section 1 is characterized by views of the East Branch and Bog Brook Reservoirs, wooded areas, and residences, institutional uses, the Town Hall and Court, and restaurants set back from the roadway. From Milltown Road north to Clocktower Commons transi- tions to a more commercial area. Section 1 of the Study Area, particularly south of Milltown Road, is constrained by New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP) owned reservoirs and land. In addition, there are ridge- line areas on both the west and east sides of Route 22 in this section. Existing zoning south of Milltown Road is predominantly Rural Commercial (RC), R-160 (Single- Family 4-acre), R-60 (Single-Family 1.5-acre), R-40 (Single-Family 1-acre), and RMF (Multi-family). Section 1 Existing Zoning Map From top to bottom (left to right): East Branch Reservoir Spillway (Section 1), Town Hall (Section 1), Car Wash (Section 2), Office Building (Section 3) 4 Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan From Milltown Road north, the zoning transitions to Office (OP-1) and the land is less constrained. There are two existing office complexes, a large bank property, and the Elk’s Lodge within this segment. In addition, there are two undeveloped parcels—the former Dill’s Best Lumber property on the east side of Route 22 and a wooded parcel behind the bank on the west side of Route 22 which has the benefit of access from a signal- ized intersection. Lastly, on the west side of Route 22, and just south of Clocktower Commons, is the Brewster Woods townhome development. This residential area is currently zoned Special Rote 22 (SR22). Section 2: Clocktower Commons to Brewster Towne Centre From Clocktower Commons to Brewster Towne Centre Route 22 is characterized by highway commercial uses. Within this section there are two large retail centers— Lakeview Plaza and Brewster Towne Centre. There are also stand alone restaurants parcels, including the Seven Stars Diner and the iconic Red Rooster. Clocktower Commons is predominantly office uses, but also includes a sit-down restaurant. Other uses within the section include gas stations with conveniences stores, car washes, fast food establishments, banks, a motel, and small retail or services businesses. The existing zoning within the section is predominantly SR22, with just the west side of Route 22 near the intersection with Route 312 being Highway Commercial (HC). Constraints within this section of Route 22 are the lack of municipal sewer and water infrastructure, and the presence of NYSDEC regulated wetlands. While this area is the most developed, there are several large and underutilized parcels. The largest being the former “Golf Dome” property on the east side of Route 22 across from Lakeview Plaza. This property currently housed a sports facility, but has been vacant for approximately 15 years. The site is constrained by NYSDEC regulated wetlands on the west and steep slopes to the east, but has access from a signalized intersection. There is also a large flat vacant lot on the east side of Route 22 just south of the Red Rooster. The southern end of this property may be encumbered by the NYSDEC wetland buffer, but there is development potential on the northern portion. Lastly on the west side of Route 22 north of Lakeview Plaza there is a large vacant parcel that formerly housed a floral shop. Section 2 Existing Zoning Map From left to right: Motel (Section 2), Red Rooster (Section 2), 7 Stars Diner (Section 2) 5Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan Section 3: Brewster Towne Centre to Town of Patterson (including Old Doansburg Road) Large office complexes and institutional uses dominate the east side of Route 22 north of Route 312, whereas smaller office buildings, automotive uses, and vacant land characterize the west side of Route 22. This section of Route 22 houses the only self-storage building within the Town of Southeast, and it is a pre-existing non- conforming use. Section 3 contains a mix of commercial and residential zoning districts. Constraints in this section include lack of municipal water and sewer, and the west side of Route 22 is further constrained by ridgelines and the NYSDEC Bog Brook Unique Wildlife Management Area. This is reflected in the existing zoning and development patterns as the east side of Route 22 is significantly more developed than the west side in this section. On the east side of Route 22 just north of Brewster Towne Centre, there is one parcel zoned OP-1 (Hipotronics). The remainder of the east side of Route 22 is zoned OP-2 to the Town line. The west side of Route 22, Kelly’s Corner and the self-storage building are zoned HC. Then the zoning transition to RC to the northern end of Old Doansburg Road, then a large NYSDEC owned parcel is zoned R-60, and the last parcel in the Town is zoned RC. Potential development parcels in Section 3 include several small lots on the east and west sides of Old Doansburg Road, which was rezoned from OP-1 to RC in 2004, constraining further development of this area. There are also three large vacant parcels on the east side of Route 22 near the Patterson Town line. Economic and Demographic Conditions The charts and graphs within this section depict economic and demographic conditions within the corridor, and specifically the 5-minute and 10-minute drive trade areas. The 5-minute drive trade area captures a substantial segment of I-84, as well as the neighborhoods immediately surrounding the Route 22 corridor. The 10-minute drive trade area captures nearly all of the Town of Southeast, as well as portions of Danbury, North Salem, and Patterson. Section 3 Existing Zoning Map Underdeveloped property (Section 3) Lakeview Plaza (Section 3) 6 Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan Demographic and Income Comparison Profiles Table 1: 5-Minute Drive-Time Radius Area: 12.05 square miles 0 0.8 1.6mi Site Map 1066-1072 RT-22 5-Mile Drive-Time Radius Area: 12.05 square miles October 30, 2020 ©2020 Esri Page 1 of 1 5-Minute Drive Time Radius 0 1 2mi Site Map 10-Minute Drive-Time Radius Prepared by Esri Area: 75.62 square miles October 30, 2020 ©2020 Esri Page 1 of 1 10-Minute Drive Time Radius 2010 2020 2025 Population 6,265 6,225 6,130 Households 2,118 2,113 2,085 Families 1,500 1,477 1,451 Average Household Size 2.92 2.91 2.91 Owner Occupied Housing Units 1,480 1,456 1,437 Renter Occupied Housing Units 638 657 647 Median Age 40.0 41.5 42.7 Median Household Income NA $92,540 $100,410 Average Household Income NA $119,551 $131,289 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2020 and 2025. 7Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan Table 2: 10-Minute Drive-Time Radius Area: 75.62 square miles Tapestry Segmentation1 Esri Tapestry Segmentation is a tool that classifies neighborhoods into 67 unique segments based on demographic, socioeconomic characteristics, and lifestyle choices. It provides a macro-level description of the type of household living in a study area. Esri classifies households within the 10-minute drive area of Route 22 as predominantly “Pleasantville” (43%) and “Savvy Suburbanite” (28%), followed by “Golden Years” (8.4%). A brief description of each is provided below, and a detailed profile is provided in Appendix B. 1 Descriptions and socioeconomic traits provided by Esri (https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/tapestry-segmentation/overview) Pleasantville Prosperous domesticity best describes the settled denizens of Pleasantville. Situated principally in older housing in suburban areas in the Northeast (especially in New York and New Jersey) and secondarily in the West (especially in California), these slightly older couples move less than any other market. Many couples have already transitioned to empty nesters; many are still home to adult children. Families own older, single- family homes and maintain their standard of living with dual incomes. These consumers have higher incomes and home values and much higher net worth (Index 364). Older homes require upkeep; home improvement and remodeling projects are a priority—preferably done by contractors. Residents spend their spare time participating in a variety of sports or watching movies. They shop online and in a variety of stores, from Census 2010 2020 2025 Population 34,837 36,114 36,014 Households 12,647 13,379 13,385 Families 9,120 9,440 9,404 Average Household Size 2.67 2.62 2.61 Owner Occupied Housing Units 10,182 10,294 10,279 Renter Occupied Housing Units 2,465 3,084 3,106 Median Age 41.5 43.9 44.6 Median Household Income NA $101,770 $106,633 Average Household Income NA $130,275 $143,146 Trends: 2020-2025 Annual Rate Area State National Population -0.06%0.07%0.72% Households 0.01%0.10%0.72% Families -0.08%-0.01%0.64% Owner HHs -0.03%0.01%0.72% Median Household Income 0.94%1.80%1.60% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2020 and 2025. Note: Income is expressed in current dollars. 43% 8 Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan upscale to discount, and use the Internet largely for financial purposes. Socioeconomic Traits • Education: 66% college educated, 37% with a bachelor’s degree or higher. • Low unemployment at 4.6%; higher labor force participation rate at 67%; higher proportion of households with 2 or more workers. • Many professionals in finance, information/ technology, education, or management. • Median household income denotes affluence, with income primarily from salaries, but also from investments or Social Security and retirement income. • Not cost-conscious, these consumers willing to spend more for quality and brands they like. • Prefer fashion that is classic and timeless as opposed to trendy. • Use all types of media equally (newspapers, magazines, radio, Internet, TV). “Savvy Suburbanite” Savvy Suburbanites residents are well educated, well read, and well capitalized. Families include empty nesters and empty nester wannabes, who still have adult children at home. Located in older neighborhoods outside the urban core, their suburban lifestyle includes home remodeling and gardening plus the active pursuit of sports and exercise. They enjoy good food and wine, plus the amenities of the city’s cultural events. Socioeconomic Traits • Education: 50.6% college graduates; 77.6% with some college education. • Low unemployment at 3.5%; higher labor force participation rate at 67.9% with proportionately more 2-worker households at 62.2%. • Well-connected consumers that appreciate technology and make liberal use of it for everything from shopping and banking to staying current and communicating. • Informed shoppers that do their research prior to purchasing and focus on quality. “Golden Years” Independent, active seniors nearing the end of their careers or already in retirement best describes Golden Years residents. This market is primarily singles living alone or empty nesters. Those still active in the labor force are employed in professional occupations; however, these consumers are actively pursuing a variety of leisure interests— travel, sports, dining out, museums, and concerts. They are involved, focused on physical fitness, and enjoying their lives. This market is smaller, but growing, and financially secure. Socioeconomic Traits • Golden Years residents are well educated—22% have graduate or professional degrees, 28% have bachelor’s degrees, and 25% have some college credits. • Unemployment is low at 4%, but so is labor force participation at 56%, due to residents reaching retirement. • Median household income is higher in this market, more than $71,000. Although wages still provide income to nearly 2 out of 3 households, earned income is available from investments, Social Security benefits, and retirement income. • These consumers are well connected: Internet access is used for everything from shopping or paying bills to monitoring investments and entertainment. • They are generous supporters of the arts and charitable organizations. • They keep their landlines and view cell phones more as a convenience. Leakage and Surplus Factors Esri Retail MarketPlace Profile identifies “leakage” and “surplus” by industry subsector and group. The leakage and surplus factor represents the balance between supply and demand. A leakage indicates that people 28% 8.4% 9Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan are leaving the drive time radius to purchase that item elsewhere. A surplus indicates that there is a high concentration of that type of use within the drive time radius. The charts below break out the industries by North American Industry Classification (NAICS) code. The leakage and surplus factor is measured on a scale from 100 to -100. A value of 100 represents an area where there is household demand but no supply, and a value of -100 represents an area with a surplus of supply but no household demand. The closer the value is to zero, the more balance there is between supply and demand. 5-Minute Drive Time Radius Leakage/Surplus Factor 2017 Leakage/Surplus Factor by Industry Subsector 2017 Leakage/Surplus Factor by Industry Group 10 Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan 10-Minute Drive Time Radius Leakage/Surplus Factor 2017 Leakage/Surplus Factor by Industry Subsector 2017 Leakage/Surplus Factor by Industry Group Environmental Conditions The Town of Southeast is located within the New York City East of Hudson Watershed, and the Route 22 Corridor specifically is located between the Bog Brook and East Branch reservoirs. This proximity to the reservoirs and the presence of reservoir stems, limits the development potential of certain parcels within the corridor. In addition there are several NYSDEC regulated wetlands along the corridor, the most significant being the Bog Brook Unique Wildlife Management Area on the East Branch Reservoir 11Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan west side of Route 22 near the northern end of Town (see Figure 1). Lastly, a large portion of the soils along Route 22 are classified by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey as being “somewhat limited” or “very limited” in their ability to serve as septic tank absorption fields or wastewater disposal. Water and Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure There is no municipal sewer or water infrastructure in the Route 22 corridor in the Town of Southeast. Each property is reliant on water supply well(s) and on-site wastewater disposal systems. However, private sani- tary sewage treatment plants serve the three largest developments along the corridor. Each of these sewage treatment plants operate under a State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Permit, and are regulated by the NYCDEP. Future expansion or service extension to adjacent properties would be subject to New York City Watershed Regulations. Service extensions would also require agreements between the private operators and property owners. The three existing wastewater treatment plants include: Clocktower Commons and Lakeview Plaza Clocktower Commons and Lakeview Plaza share a wastewater treatment facility that currently has excess capacity that could accommodate new commercial development and potentially a small number of resi- dential units. Brewster Towne Centre The Brewster Towne Centre wastewater treatment plant was updated and expanded in 2015 to meet existing demands at that time. A service extension to the former gas station property at the corner Route 312 and Route 22 was approved in 2015, however that project stalled and the connection has not yet been made. Additional capacity is not anticipated. Mount Ebo Mount Ebo has a wastewater treatment plant and water supply wells that serve a number of businesses, institutional uses, and housing developments within and adjacent to the Mount Ebo Corporate Park. Barrett Hill, a new multi-family residential develop- ment, is under construction and will connect to these systems. Additional capacity beyond that connection is not anticipated. Brewster WWTP Bog Brook Reservoir 12 Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan Natural Resources Map Figure 1 Orangetown Route 340Closter RdRo u t e 9 WOak Tree R d Fern RdForrest DrP alis a d e s Inter sta te P k wy Horne T o o k e Rd Dako taS tBroad AveMorningside AveIroquoisAveYadanza CtWhite Oak RdSwan StDelongisCtL aurenRdK o p a c L n V a nTerHey Hoe Woods Rd0 1 ,000 FEET 334 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 109641 1 .20.20 Bergen Bronx Rockland Westchester NJ NY!\ Freshwater Emergent Wetland (PEM) Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland (PFO, PSS) Freshwater Pond (PUB, PAB) Lake (L) Riverine (R) Freshwater Wetlands (NYSDEC) Streams 10-ft Contours 13Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan Traffic and Transportation Route 22 is owned by NYSDOT and is classified as a Principal Arterial-Other2. This two-lane roadway carries a total of approximately 15,882 vehicles per day between Route 312 and the Patterson Town Line, and a total of approximately 22,666 vehicles per day between Route 312 and I-684. The average speed south of Route 312 is 28 mile per hour (mph) and the average speed north of Route 312 is 45 mph3. There are no bike lanes or sidewalks within this stretch of Route 22. NYSDOT previously studied the widening of Route 22 to four lanes, however this project was never implemented. Instead, limited sections were widened to accommodate merging and turning at major 2 NYSDOT Functional Class Viewer (https://gis.dot.ny.gov/html5viewer/?viewer=FC) 3 NYSDOT Traffic Data Viewer (https://www.dot.ny.gov/tdv) intersections. NYSDOT has indicated that there are presently no plans for expansion of Route 22, and there are no major projects identified in the New York State FFY 2020-2023 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for this segment of Route 22. The 2018 Putnam County Commercial Corridors Study identified a high rate of accidents between Milltown Road and Dykeman Road—particularly rear-end colli- sions. The study reported Route 22’s accident rate of 6.2 accidents/million vehicle miles (ACC/MVM) as being substantially greater than NYSDOT average accident rate for similar two-lane undivided highways, which was 3.5 accidents/million vehicle miles ACC/MVM in 2015/16. D. The Master Plan Proposed Land Use and Zoning As a result of the analysis of economic and demo- graphics conditions, the online survey, discussions with the Planning Board, local business and property owners, and the general public, the Route 22 Master Plan recom- mends a number of zoning text and map changes. Recommended Zoning Text Changes The Route 22 Master Plan survey sought input from the public on a variety of commercial and residential uses. Overwhelmingly, respondents viewed Route 22 as a commercial corridor and recommended expansion and continuation of a broad range of commercial uses. The desire for residential uses was limited to senior housing and mixed-use, such as a live-work develop- ment. Further, the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for flexibility with regards to parking and drop-off/pick-up areas, outdoor seating, and the value of drive-thrus. Overall, the Code should be updated to increase flexibility and lessen restrictions on these accessory uses. 14 Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan Special Route 22 (SR22) The Route 22 Master Plan proposes an expansion of the SR22 Zoning District, as well as the modification and updating of certain design standards and allow- able uses. At the time the SR22 zoning was written “big box” stores were proliferating and a maximum building size was established. However, the big box trend has declined with the advent of online shopping and there may be other uses—such as highly desirable recreation uses—that require a larger footprint. As such, the maximum allowable building size should be increased. Increasing residential density within walkable commer- cial areas is important to the vibrancy and long-term viability of a community, and is widely recognized by planning organizations as good practice. New residences within walking distance to retail areas can support local businesses as they increase the potential base of customers and employees, reduce car dependence, and minimize sprawl. To permit additional residential uses, the SR22 Zoning District regulations should be revised to increase the allowable percentage of accessory residential from 20% of the total gross floor area (GFA) of permitted space for all uses to 40% of GFA. A new “Live/Work” Special Permit Use with associated conditions should also be added to the SR22 Zoning District. Senior housing is currently a Special Permit use in the SR22 Zoning District and this should continue to be permitted. Self-storage facilities are a low water/low sanitary sewer generating use that is not currently permitted in the Town of Southeast. The argument against self-storage facilities has been that they are unattractive and do not contribute to the vibrancy or walkability of the commu- nity. However, there is commercial demand for this type of use, and as a low-water/low-sanitary sewer use it could serve to infill or support some of the underutilized properties along Route 22 as an accessory use. Special Permit regulations could be employed to impose strict design guidelines, location requirements (i.e., must be located in the rear of a property with active uses such as retail at the street), and maximum floor area to permit self-storage in a way that would not be detrimental to the pedestrian and streetscape recommendations of the Route 22 Master Plan. The Town of Southeast and Village of Brewster have long been a destination for automobile dealerships. To accommodate these uses on Route 22, the Special Permit criteria should be updated to reduce the minimum lot size requirement from 15 acres to 4 acres. To address traffic concerns—a new requirement for signalized access to Route 22 should be added. 15Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan In addition, the existing Special Permit regulations prohibit dealerships that primarily engage in pre- owned car sales. This prohibition should be reconsid- ered in light of new trends in pre-owned car dealer- ships that operate in a manner very similar to new car dealerships. The Special Permit regulations would be employed to ensure that pre-owned dealerships are held to the same design standards as new car sales. In addition, a minimum building size of 7,500 square feet could be added to the Special Permit criteria to avoid traditional “used car lots.” In summary, the following uses should be added to the SR22 Zoning District: Conditional Use Permit Uses • General Business • Theater/performing arts • Research labs • Animal Hospital/Veterinary Practice • Doggie Day-care Special Permit Uses • Self-storage • Motor vehicle dealership Highway Commercial (HC) The existing HC Zoning District should be updated to add self-storage as a new Special Permit Use. As discussed in the previous section, Special Permit criteria with strong design requirements should be established to ensure that new self-storage uses do not look like blank boxes or a wall of garage doors from Route 22. Rural Commercial (RC) The RC district should be amended to permit single- family residential uses at the same density as the R-160 Zoning District, which is essentially one unit per acre. This low density residential use is consistent with the rural nature of the RC zoning designation. Rural Commercial-2 (RC-2) A new RC-2 Zoning District is proposed as a transi- tional zoning district between commercial and rural residential areas. This district would permit the same allowable uses as RC (including proposed allowance of single-family residential), but would reduce minimum lot size, setback, and other dimensional requirements. The dimensional requirements would be comparable to those of the OP-1 Zoning District. In addition, the new RC-2 Zoning District would permit General Business as a permitted principal use. Recommended Zoning Map Changes Section 1: End of I-684 to Clocktower Commons The Town of Southeast recognizes the value in preserving the bucolic nature of the large, undeveloped and underdeveloped properties on either side of Route 22 at the terminus of I-684. To that end, the Route 22 Master Plan recommends retaining the existing RC and residential zoning designations of these parcels. However, the Town desires new commercial development in the vicinity of Milltown Road, and the current OP-1 zoning designation has inhibited that development. As such, the Route 22 Master Plan recommends extending the SR22 Zoning Designation south to capture all of the properties currently zoned OP-1. In addition, the rezoning of the Brewster Woods residential development to RMF should be considered, as it is currently a pre- existing non-conforming use in that zoning district. Section 1 Proposed Zoning Map 16 Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan 2007 Route 22 Area Master Plan Figure 2 The 2007 Route 22 Master Plan included this overall conceptual plan. While some elements are no longer feasible due to the reclassifica- tion of the central wetland as NYSDEC regulated, the overarching design concept of a walkable community with street trees and neighborhood retail and services remain applicable today. 17Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan Section 2: Clocktower Commons to Brewster Towne Centre Overall, the barrier to new development in Section 2 is related to lack of sewer and water infrastructure. The SR22 Zoning is quasi-form based code that focuses on design characteristics and permits a substantial amount of flexibility in regards to dimensional require- ments. It also permits a wide range of uses by Special Use or Conditional Use Permit. As such, the SR22 zone is proposed to be extended to include the west side of Route 22 up to Route 312. The two parcels on this corner are undersized and would benefit from the dimensional flexibility permitted in SR22. Section 3: Brewster Towne Centre to Town of Patterson (including Old Doansburg Road) The east side of Route 22 has seen steady develop- ment over the years. Much of it is served by private water and sewer infrastructure, and those parcels that are not have sufficient soils and lot sizes to accom- modate new development under the existing zoning. As such, no changes are proposed to the current OP-2 zoning district. However, on the west side of Route 22 the 2004 rezoning of parcels along either side of Old Doansburg Road from OP-1 to RC—which has very large dimen- sional requirements and a more limited number of uses—rendered a number of these properties pre- existing non-conforming. This rezoning was imple- mented to protect the ridgeline areas and Bog Brook Unique Area. However, it also hindered the redevelop- ment and improvement of several existing buildings and properties along this corridor. The Route 22 Master Plan recommends rezoning the parcels with frontage on Old Doansburg Road and south of Foggintown Road back to OP-1, but retaining the large undeveloped parcel fronting on Foggintown Road as RC. In addition, from Foggintown Road north to Route 22, the parcels on either side of Old Doansburg Road should be rezoned to a new RC-2 Zoning designation. RC-2 would permit the same allowable uses as RC plus general business, but would have smaller dimensional requirements. The reason for distinguishing these two areas is that north of Foggintown Road there are several residential buildings that would be more appropriate with the uses permitted in the RC zoning district. Section 2 Proposed Zoning Map Section 3 Proposed Zoning Map 18 Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan Also on the west side of Route 22, the Master Plan recommends extending the existing HC zoning district north to capture the under construction office building, the Colonial Square office park, and an existing gas station. Infrastructure The lack of sewer and water infrastructure is the greatest barrier to new development within the Route 22 corridor. Poor soils and required separation distances between wells and septic systems have inhibited the redevelopment of several major parcels. However, In 2019 NYCDEP adopted new watershed regu- lations that eliminated the “hardship” criterion neces- sary for obtaining a variance from the Regulations, which could facilitate new connections and expansions previously considered infeasible. Recommended Actions 1. The Town should work to facilitate agreements between private sewer/water providers to expand or extend service where feasible to enable the development of underutilized properties. 2. A secondary, and less preferred option, would be for the Town of Southeast to assume control of private wastewater treatment systems, expand existing capacity, and to extend service lines through the corridor. Traffic and Transportation Survey respondents saw existing traffic conditions on Route 22 as a barrier to new development on Route 22. They noted the stop and go traffic during rush hours and the difficulty of making left hand turns throughout the corridor as reasons to shop elsewhere. In addi- tion to wanting traffic management improvements, there was also a strong desire to see new pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure. In particular, the addition of sidewalks with sufficient buffer area between the roadway and pedestrians, protected bike lanes that connect to the Maybrook and Putnam County Trailways, crosswalks, and improved streetscape design. Figure 3 presents a conceptual alignment— further engineering and design studies are required to determine feasibility. Recommended Actions 1. The Town should adopt a Complete Streets policy and actively pursue grants and/or public/private partnerships to facilitate the installation of sidewalks, protected bike lanes, crosswalks and a cohesive landscape design for the corridor. Given the proximity of this corridor to NYCDEP reservoirs and NYSDEC wetlands, new bike lanes and sidewalks should utilize pervious pavement or compacted gravel where feasible. 2. The Town supports the widening of Route 22 to accommodate dedicated left turn lanes and landscaped medians where appropriate. However, medians must not inhibit access to local businesses. 3. The Planning Board should require all new development and redevelopment applications to provide connections between adjacent parking lots, stub end streets for future connections, and to reduce the number of driveways and width of curb cuts where feasible. Route 22 Survey Word Cloud: In your experience or observation, what are the barriers to new businesses or development along the route 22 corridor? 19Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan Conceptual Route 22 Bike Lanes and Trail Connections Figure 3 OrangetownRoute 340Closter RdRoute9W Oak Tree R d Fern RdForrest DrPalisadesInterstatePkwy H orne T o o k e Rd Dako taS tBroad AveMorningside AveIroquoisAveYadanza CtWhite Oak RdSwan StDelongisCtL aurenRdK o p a c L nVanTerHey Hoe Woods Rd0 1 ,000 FEET 334 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 109641 1 .20.20 Bergen Bronx Rockland Westchester NJ NY!\ Surface connection from Maybrook Trailway to Route 22 Corridor along Sodom Road Explore opportunities with NYCDEP and NYSDOT to provide protected north-south bike lanes with adequate separation from high-speed traffic exiting I-684. Coordinate with NYCDEP regarding potential for pervious path connections over NYCDEP lands. Proposed Maybrook Trailway. Connection to Maybrook Trailway and Putnam County Trailway. Protected north-south bike lanes on either side of Route 22. Opportunities to connect residential neighbor- hoods, institutional uses, and office buildings to bike lanes. 20 Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan Landscape Design Guidelines The Route 22 Corridor is a gateway to the Town of Southeast, but it lacks consistent curb appeal. Consistent landscaping is an important and inexpensive solution to tie the disparate architecture along Route 22 together. As such, the Route 22 Master Plan recom- mends a cohesive approach to landscaping along the corridor and sets forth recommendations and aesthetic considerations for the three zones along the corridor: Rural, Transitional, and Commercial. Specifically, the Route 22 Master Plan recommends: • Planting American Elm, Honey Locust, and White Oak street trees along the corridor; • Installing native and non-invasive ornamental plant species that can withstand the environmental conditions along roadway and within parking areas; • Encouraging the use of annuals and seasonal displays at site entrances; • Permitting no more than 25% of a property’s road frontage to be stormwater management basins; and • Requiring the use of steel-backed timber guiderails in locations where guiderails are necessary. Recommended Actions 1. The Town should seek public private partnerships with local business groups, chambers of commerce, arts groups, and not-for-profits to establish a beautification program for the corridor. The program could include seasonal road clean-up days, sponsored plantings, attractive “Welcome to Southeast” signage, and public art displays. 2. The Zoning Code should be updated to include specific design standards and recommended plantings. Recommended plantings include native, hardy, and road salt tolerant species that are appropriate for commercial conditions and generally available in the landscape trade. All landscaping must comply with NYS DOT regulations. Preferred trees Trees will be the backbone that unifies Route 22 for the future. The three trees below will provide beauty, shade and consistency to the corridor. When planted they should be 2.5 to 3” caliper. American Elm - Umus americana (Princeton or Valley Forge) Honey Locust - Geditsia triacanthos Linden - Tilia americana Red Maple - Acer rubrum White Oak - Quercus alba Preferred shrubs and small trees (most salt tolerant) Bayberry - Myrica pensylvanica Blueberry Highbush - Vaccinium corymbosum Chokeberry - Aronia Hydrangeas - Hydrangea (querifolia, macrophylla) Inkberry - Ilex glabra Junipers - Juniperus (Bar Harbor, communis) Ninebark - Hysocarpus Redbud - Cercis canadensis Serviceberry - Amelanchier laevis Summersweet - Clethra alnifolia Winterberry - Ilex verticillata Witch Hazel - Hamamelis x intermedia Non-Native but salt tolerant shrubs Lilac - Syringa pubescens ‘Miss Kim’ or Syringa meyeri ‘Palibin’ Mugo Pine - Pinus mugo Preferred Perennials: Aster (New York or New England) - Aster nova-belgii or novae angliae Bee Balm - Monarda Black-Eyed Susan - Rudbeckia Bluestar - Amsonia tabernaemontanta Cone Flower - Echinacea Coral Bells - Heuchera americanea Goldenrod - Solidago Yarrow - Achillea millefolium Non-Native but salt tolerant Day Lily - Hemerocallis fulva Russian Sage - Salvia yangii (previously known as Perovskia atriplicifolia) In addition, annuals and seasonal display plantings are strongly encouraged. 21Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan OrangetownRoute 340Closter RdRoute9W Oak Tree R d Fern RdForrest DrPalisadesInterstatePkwyHorne T o o k eRdDako taS tBroad AveMorningside AveIroquoisAveYadanza CtWhite Oak RdSwan StDelongisCtL aurenRdK o p a c L nVanTerHey Hoe Woods Rd0 1 ,000 FEET 334 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 109641 1 .20.20 Bergen Bronx Rockland Westchester NJ NY!\ Route 22 Landscape Guidelines Figure 4 Transitional Zone: Introduce sidewalks and pedestrian amenities to connect residential areas to commercial areas. Maintain a landscaped buffer between sidewalks and Route 22 where feasible. Encourage more formal landscaping. Commercial Zone: Sidewalks and pedestrian connections between devel- opments. Formal entrance plantings at shopping plazas, restaurants, and other commercial entrances. Rural Zone: Maintain and enhance rural landscape. Encourage use of wildflowers, native trees and shrubs. Maintain stone walls. 22 Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan Commercial Zone Hardscape Guidelines Figure 5 Standardize guiderails and fencing Encourage outdoor dining areas and pedestrian amenities Use consistent street “furniture” 23Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan Colorful perennials and seasonal annuals at entrances Bee balm Echinacea Goldenrod Amsonia Hardy and salt-tolerant shrubs buffering parking areas from Route 22 Juniper Hydrangea Winterberry Bayberry Serviceberry Witch hazel Street trees to line Route 22 Elm tree Honey locust Commercial Zone Planting Guidelines Figure 6 24 Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan E. Implementation Route 22 is a vital north south corridor for retail and other commercial uses within the limits of the Town of Southeast. Future development on this corridor should be visually appealing, serve the local community, and improve pedestrian, bike, and vehicular infrastructure. Overall, the Town of Southeast seeks to balance a healthy economic environment with quality of life infrastructure improvements that benefit both the Town’s residents and commercial businesses. This Section summarizes the Implementation Actions recommended by this Route 22 Master Plan, and establishes a list of priority action items identifying which items can be accomplished in the short, long, and medium terms. Goal Short Term Medium Term Long Term Establish consistent land use and zoning policies along the corridor that reflect current land use trends and community needs. Amend the Town’s Zoning Code and Zoning Map to implement the changes recom- mended in the Route 22 Master Plan. Periodically review Route 22 Master Plan and update/ amend as necessary to reflect and use, traffic, and socioeconomic trends. Increase access to water supply and sanitary sewer infrastructure. Facilitate agreements between private sewer/water providers to expand or extend service where feasible to enable the development of underutilized properties. Seek infrastructure, NYCDEP watershed, and/ or economic development grant funding to pursue additional connections and expansions of private water and sewer infrastructure. If private solutions to water/ sewer infrastructure needs do not come to fruition, the Town could assume control of private wastewater treatment systems, expand existing capacity, and to extend service lines through the corridor. Improve traffic flow and establish new pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure. Adopt a Complete Streets policy for Route 22. The Planning Board should require all new development and redevelopment applica- tions to provide connections between adjacent parking lots, stub end streets for future connections, and to reduce the number of driveways and width of curb cuts where feasible. Actively pursue grants and/or public/private partnerships to facilitate the installation of sidewalks, protected bike lanes, crosswalks and a cohesive landscape design for the corridor. Work with NYSDOT to widen Route 22 to accommodate dedicated left turn lanes and landscaped medians where appropriate. Beautify the Route 22 Corridor through consistent landscaping, signage, and street “furniture.” Update the Zoning Code to include specific design standards and recom- mended plantings. Seek public private partnerships with local business groups, chambers of commerce, arts groups, and not- for-profits to establish a beautification program for the corridor. 25Town of Southeast | Route 22 Master Plan Attachment ASurvey Results Environmental, Planning, and Engineering Consultants 34 South Broadway Suite 401 White Plains, NY 10601 tel: 914 949-7336 fax: 914 949-7559 www.akrf.com Offices in New York ● New Jersey ● Pennsylvania ● Maryland ● Connecticut Memorandum To: Town of Southeast Planning Board From: Ashley Ley, AICP and Madeleine Helmer Date: September 25, 2020 Re: Town of Southeast Route 22 Master Plan Survey Results cc: Victoria Desidero As part of the Route 22 Master Plan process, AKRF conducted a survey to solicit input from residents, businesses, and other interested parties on their vision for the future of Route 22 corridor from the end of I-684 to the Patterson town line. The survey was available to the public online from August 3, 2020, to September 18, 2020. During this time, the survey received 397 responses, of which 339 were from Town of Southeast residents and 22 were from Town of Southeast business or commercial property owners on Route 22. A. PROFILE OF SURVEY RESPONDENTS Town of Southeast Planning Board 2 September 25, 2020 B. INFRASTRUCTURE Town of Southeast Planning Board 3 September 25, 2020 C. BUSINESS/COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OWNER QUESTIONS Question: If you own a business on Route 22, please indicate the reasons you chose that location and how important that was to your decision. Town of Southeast Planning Board 4 September 25, 2020 D. LAND USE PREFERENCES Question: For each of the land uses listed below, please indicate whether you think the use should be encouraged, discouraged, no change, or no opinion, along the Route 22 corridor. Town of Southeast Planning Board 5 September 25, 2020 Town of Southeast Planning Board 6 September 25, 2020 Town of Southeast Planning Board 7 September 25, 2020 Town of Southeast Planning Board 8 September 25, 2020 E. OPEN ENDED QUESTIONS The following four survey questions were open-ended, asking respondents to write their own observations, visions, and preferences. For each question, all responses could generally be attributed to a set of seven to nine categories. Below is a list of the survey response categories, selected representative quotes from each survey category, and an analysis of the survey responses for each of the four open-ended questions. A complete list of all open-ended survey responses is included in Appendix A. QUESTION: IN YOUR EXPERIENCE OR OBSERVATION, WHAT ARE THE BARRIERS TO NEW BUSINESSES OR DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE ROUTE 22 CORRIDOR? RESPONSE CATEGORIES Responses to this survey generally fall within seven categories: water and sewer issues; traffic and turning; zoning and permitting issues; financial, such as rent and taxes; no draw for shoppers; aesthetics; and not pedestrian-friendly. REPRESENTATIVE QUOTES Water and sewer issues “Septic waste to new businesses.” Traffic and turning “Single lane on 22 for large stretch of road creates bottlenecks and makes it tough for cars to get in/out of businesses. Quality of road is so poor I often go other ways to purposefully avoid this stretch ” Zoning and permitting issues “Zoning. It zigzags across Route 22 making one business legal on one side of the road but directly across the road not legal. The zoning in the area is unfair and doesn't really make any sense.” Financial, such as rent and taxes “NYS Tax” No draw for shoppers “Nothing interesting there... No specialty stores, just bread and butter types. No reason to go there, unless you really have to.” Aesthetics “It looks run down and if I was a business owner I'd look to another town. It feels like we're an industrial town that lacks the means to support a business.” Not pedestrian-friendly “Not walkable - no sidewalks - hard to cross the street” Town of Southeast Planning Board 9 September 25, 2020 SUMMARY OF SURVEY RESULTS Word Cloud: In your experience or observation, what are the barriers to new businesses or development along the route 22 corridor? Town of Southeast Planning Board 10 September 25, 2020 QUESTION: WHAT ARE YOUR VISIONS AND GOALS FOR ROUTE 22? RESPONSE CATEGORIES Responses to this survey generally fall within eight categories: sustainable growth; more retail and restaurants; family-friendly businesses and activities; parks, open space and recreation; traffic flow; more housing; aesthetics/beautification; and a village destination (sidewalks, small shops, square, etc.). REPRESENTATIVE QUOTES Sustainable growth “Any further development on Route 22 must not cause additional travel delays that are burdensome at many times. Development must also preserve the rural character of the town. Route 22 should not appear to be a continuous, miles-long stretch of built-up properties.” More retail and restaurants “I would love to see a Costco/BJ’s or a good grocery store. A Target would be great too. Just no more pizza, nail, auto part stores” Family-friendly businesses and activities “More fun attractions for families” Parks, open space and recreation “Open useable space mixed with family friendly enterprises” Traffic flow “I would like to see route 22 be expanded to a 4 lane pattern to ease the flow” More housing “Housing and support for housing (grocery, daycare, and restaurants) there are some beautiful views that are blocked by Acme grocery and the highway department.” Aesthetics/beautification “Beautification –Add more upscale areas with sitting and walkable areas. Make areas more quaint.” A village destination (sidewalks, small shops, square, etc.) “To have a visually appealing, fitting for the rural and picturesque town of Southeast that has a center of focus for people to go and shop at local stores, eat at a local restaurant, and have some aspect of country environment (bike trails, walkways, recreation). Please do not over commercialize. Dog friendly would also be nice! It would be great to have a town park where people could enjoy open space with walking, trails, picnics, etc.” Town of Southeast Planning Board 11 September 25, 2020 SUMMARY OF SURVEY RESULTS Word Cloud: What are your visions and goals for route 22? Town of Southeast Planning Board 12 September 25, 2020 QUESTION: ASIDE FROM TRAFFIC, WHAT IMPROVEMENTS (E.G. INFRASTRUCTURE, STREETSCAPE, SIDEWALKS, ETC.) WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE ALONG THE ROUTE 22 CORRIDOR? RESPONSE CATEGORIES Responses to this survey generally fall within nine categories: sidewalks; bike lanes; bus stops; water and sewer; landscaping; outdoor community amenities (e.g. farmers market, square, outdoor cafe, park, trails); pedestrian crossings; lighting (street and sidewalk); and streetscape. REPRESENTATIVE QUOTES Sidewalks “Sidewalks, parks, benches. A place a family can stop and walk around without being directly on 22.” Bike lanes “Bike lanes!! Would be great, connecting it to the rail trail!” Bus stops “Streetscape, sidewalks, covered bus stops, infrastructure” Water and sewer “Municipal Sewer and water” Landscaping “Would be nice if the corridor could have some nice landscaping. Some towns look beautiful because they are well maintained.” Outdoor community amenities (eg. farmers markets, square, outdoor cafes, park, trails) “mini parks ( handful of trees, couple of benches), places where small groups of people can get together” Pedestrian crossings “Sidewalks and crosswalks would improve and quality of life and safety. Teens would love to be able to walk around.” Lighting (street and sidewalk) “I think of you are going to do a revitalization you have to make safe walking paths and crossings, whether it be a pedestrian bridge etc. plus you need ample lighting.” Streetscape “Better signage and street scaping (decorative lights, community greetings, etc). Create sidewalks and bike lanes” Town of Southeast Planning Board 13 September 25, 2020 SUMMARY OF SURVEY RESULTS QUESTION: ARE THERE ANY OTHERS THOUGHTS OR IDEAS THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SHARE REGARDING THE ROUTE 22 CORRIDOR? RESPONSE CATEGORIES Responses to this survey generally fall within eight categories: improved traffic flow; maintain rural character/limit sprawl; family/community-friendly spaces; aesthetic improvements; more housing; less housing ; more retail and restaurants; and slower traffic/safety. REPRESENTATIVE QUOTES Improved traffic flow “Do not make route22 into another congested over crowded Central Av enue like in Westchester County! Keep Route 22 as is the only thing needed is to add an additional traffic lane in the middle to help traffic flow” Maintain rural character/limit sprawl “Encourage/maintain the small town charm in the way that Route 7 in CT has by avoiding big box stores. Encourage new businesses like outdoor eateries, restaurants and recreation.” “Don't make the site into a big city with tall buildings. We like our countryside.” Family/community-friendly spaces “Family destinations. Our school district clearly shows large quantities of children. Give them some place wholesome to enjoy with family.” “The space across from Acme plaza could be an excellent location recreational area for families With colorful playground. Beehive style stores, a plaza for outdoor concerts, outdoor art exhibition, movie theater, a lot of benches under trees. Give us a center for the youths to go to at evening, old fashion way. Where they can make all the noise they want without disturbing anyone. “ Town of Southeast Planning Board 14 September 25, 2020 Aesthetic improvements “If new lanes, sidewalks, median added, encourage business owners to landscape properties nicely.” More housing “Retail is under great stress. Retail pays a lot of school taxes but does not need much town services. Retail needs people. People need housing. To help retail and the vibrancy of the area, encourage housing - multifamily and town house developments. Figure out how to create waste water treatment to permit the housing.” Less housing “No affordable housing. No more condos/townhouses” More retail and restaurants “Trader Joe's; Whole Foods; YWCA; NYSC; YOGA studio” “An open air shopping area with small boutique shops. Like a bizarre” Slower traffic/safety “Post and limit speed. I see cars and trucks going 60, 70 mph every day!” SUMMARY OF SURVEY RESULTS Town of Southeast Planning Board 15 September 25, 2020 APPENDIX A: OPEN-ENDED SURVEY RESPONSES Town of Southeast Planning Board 16 September 25, 2020 Question 1: In your experience or observation, what are the barriers to new businesses or development along the Route 22 corridor? Disappearance of vistas 1)Traffic & Safety. Rt 22 already exceeds capacity of two–lane roadway. Congestion further compounded by multiple driveways along the corridor resulting in turning vehicles blocking through lane traffic at multiple locations. Measures to address collisions in this corridor should be considered. Per NYSDOT 174 crashes 3/1/14 - 2/28/17, (73) being rear end crashes. 2) Septic & water supply well issues, potential contamination to existing wells & NYC East Branch Reservoir. 2 lane roadway 2 lanes - should be 2 lanes w/ turning center lane. 4 lanes entire way. 5pm traffic Ability to make left turn without light. One lane wider would help. Access because of left turns Additional noise. Eliminate 18 wheelers! Additional traffic flow Additional traffic when there are already issues with traffic. advertising Already stop dead traffic during rush hours Already stop dead traffic during rush hours Availability of proper sites to lease Balancing environment concerns Bottleneck between Doansburg Road and I684 Can Brick & Mortar stores survive in a growing online presence. Can Brick & Mortar stores survive in a growing online presence. community outcry Current restrictive zoning Depends on what development is being planned. Difficulty getting into and out of businesses due to traffic. Difficulty getting on and off the road, impossibility of getting from one side of the road to the other, everything is spread out and ugly Don't want it to be more commercialized Duplication of services, venues. There are existing empty locations. Fill those first before building more. Ease of access EAST/WEST ACCESS IF DRIVING NORTH/SOUTH - A CENTER TURN LANE MIGHT HELP Employees, Environmental and congestion Environmental and congestion Existing businesses which limit broadening the highway. Exposure from passing vehicle traffic. Few safe left turns. Speeding. Too much of the same thing. Finances Finances Financing and infrastructure Former slapdash development for the sake of development without sufficient attention to overall architecture, landscaping, vistas and attractiveness. Town of Southeast Planning Board 17 September 25, 2020 Getting from the other side of the village from the drewville area its not as simple. Have to get on the end of the highway and off on 22. You can take back road of sodom rd, but it feels like the highway slices the ease of connection for getting from some businesses to others. Getting too commercial as it is already. High rent High rent, limited parking, narrow traffic lanes for the number of businesses along corridor, infratructure Higher education (university) to attract talent for new technologies. Honestly don’t understand why... but apparently people here don’t like change!! However, there is no better location than 22 to have useful shopping, restaurants and community friendly recreation. Housing I believe that a barrier to new businesses along the Route 22 corridor is the ability to easily and safely turn in and out of said business locations. Shopping centers that have traffic lights make it easier but other business that don't have this availability. I don’t believe there should be any barriers. The Town should let these businesses be built. I don’t believe there should be any barriers. The Town should let these businesses be built. I wish I knew... it appears that people get in their own way. We need a target, decent dining , family quality recreation and a clean decent grocery store. Inadequate/non-existant turn lanes to cross traffic. Power outages due to above ground lines. Increase if traffic Increase lane to 2 northbound & 2 southbound Increased commercial traffic Increased traffic and congestion. It's all about the traffic. Increased traffic and driving times Increased traffic, pollution Infrastructure is not in place. Sewer and water specifically insufficient traffic lanes It has no identity/character to it. Either make it a stretch of commerce with big brand names or turn it into Main Street like Ridgefield, CT. it looks run down and if I was a business owner I’d look to another town. It feels like we’re an industrial town that lacks the means to support a business. Same for Rte 312 as you exit from 84 towards 22. Railroad tracks, dilapidated houses, junk yards. It is impossible to make a left turn onto route 22. It is set up like a strip mall. It should have more of a small town feeling for shopping, restaurants and entertainment. It should be limited to minimal as you approach 22 from I-684, even with the improvements, there is traffic. further developments from I-684 up to Rte 312 will cause significantly more traffic, more accidents, thefts therefore creating an unsafe and peaceful location as this was the reason we moved up to Brewster, New York. It’s too narrow; not enough lanes. It's a two lane and dangerous road. You can't take a left anywhere without a light. There are simple improvements that can make the road safer and better. Start with paving. Also, make a right hand turn lane from 312 onto 22 South so 312 doesn't back up. Why don't we encourage building on Route 6 towards danbury. Much less congested and much safer. Also, let's get some new businesses that actually benefit Brewster residents, recreation, the arts, PARKS?? it's very hard to enter and exit onto rte 22 Lack of a turning lane for the entire length. It seems like there is no coordination of the timing of traffic lights. Where possible, traffic lights should be computer controlled. Lack of a walkable town center Lack of center left hand turn lane and/or right hand turn into businesses Lack of central water supply and sewer system Town of Southeast Planning Board 18 September 25, 2020 Lack of cultured people who are willing to spend money on fine goods Lack of market demand in the area Lack of municipal water and sewer service Lack of space , heavy traffic lack of traffic flow. Lack of traffic lights or turning lanes needed looks dumpy More local businesses, family friendly activities More traffic light will be needed which would slow traffic flow More traffic, people coming from other places Narrowness of roadway Narrowness of roadway Narrowness of roadway narrowness of the road for safe enter/exit and turns. Need 4 lines for traffic flow and bike paths for local communities and transportation every 1/2 hour or electric train just from Train station to the end of the new Route 22 corridor Need a 2 lane road for north & south Needless suburban sprawl - repurpose unused buildings and establishments in a more community and environmentally-focused way, not just adding for the sake of adding. Needs to be widened . Traffic is awful NIMBU No central theme, there is a gas station, a mini golf, a supermarket. No specific reason to shop there, and not in another place no pedestrian traffic, no bike lanes No turning lane No turning lane No turning lanes for cars to enter from either direction safely. Noise, traffic congestion, fear of losing the "Country" quality of the area. Urban sprawl. Noise, Traffic, Waste issues. NONE None None None Not enough customer base Not enough land space being used Not sure Not sure why, probably local politics preventing companies coming here. I heard we limit signage for companies which may turn off larger stores from coming. Not walkable - no sidewalks - hard to cross the street Not wide enough Nothing interesting there. No sidewalks. No street scaping, crossing from one side to other is impossible. Only Two lanes - is crazy. Trying to get in and out the lane can takes more than 5 minutes. But basically, it boring. No specialty stores, just bread and butter types. No reason to go there, unless you really have to. NYS. TAX One lane in each direction will cause a lot of traffic one lane in most areas is not enough One lane of traffic One lane road each direction in business districts One lane roads. Need 2 lanes each for north and south for the traffic Town of Southeast Planning Board 19 September 25, 2020 One lane traffic each way Parking and the existence of the section 8 motels People don’t want commercialized businesses. People don’t want commercialized businesses. People filing injunctions in court to stop any development of any cause. People not wanting development. Politics, Waste-water & possible traffic Pollution of the reservoir. Too much traffic from CT license plate holders. Poor long term strategic planning and lack of resolve Poor planning poor road condition and surplus commercial vacancy due to unrealistically high leasing costs Poor road design Present zoning restriction on my property. Should go back to OP-1. Did not realize you rezoned me to a very restrictive zone. process leading up to breaking ground Republicans reservoirs, wetlands (incidentally, I don't see these as barriers, I like a narrow 22). Revitalize the village Right now the corridor is used for people going away to Vermont, many different places. The traffic has increased but I do appreciate the road repaving. It needed it very badly. Right now the corridor is used for people going away to Vermont, many different places. The traffic has increased but I do appreciate the road repaving. It needed it very badly. Right turn needs to be addressed from 312 to 22 when light is red. Backs up traffic on 312 road conditions; traffic patterns; turning lanes, jughandles Road must be updated and expanded. Road needs widening and good turning lanes. Roads Roadways with more lanes Route 22 is too narrow and may not handle the increased traffic. Route 22 is too narrow and may not handle the increased traffic. Route 22 is too small (only 2 lanes) to handle increased traffic - already congested. route 22 would need to be two lanes in each direction from beginning to end Route 22 would need to widen from 2 to 4 lanes. At the minimum, a center lane strictly for turning left or right into or out of a business. Rules and regulations. Not exactly sure why but it seems projects take an extremely long time to come to fruition. Also, traffic. In the area of Milltown to Doansburg northbound traffic is difficult to get to a business on the west side of 22, and vice-versa. It’s been going on for years with many studies but it still exists. Time to look at rules and regulations? Rush hour traffic Septic waste to new businesses. Sewage, infrastructure, TRAFFIC Sewage/Septic Sewer & Water Signage Since there is less commuting there is less traffic now. However traffic during rush hours has been heavy making it difficult to get to businesses on 22. You add more housing the traffic will become heavier. Single lane Single lane Town of Southeast Planning Board 20 September 25, 2020 Single lane on 22 for large stretch of road creates bottlenecks and makes it tough for cars to get in/out of businesses. Quality of road is so poor I often go other ways to purposefully avoid this stretch Single lane roadway .. the town needs to expand to at least 2 lanes running north and south throughout the entire stretch of route 22 Single lane traffic between Milltown Rd and Route 312. Some barriers I would note to new businesses or development along Route 22 would be: disruption to traffic flow; hazardous driving conditions with too many entrances/egresses to businesses; dangerous conditions for pedestrians crossing Route 22. Some people can’t handle change, others don’t realize the advantages of having shopping in our own community. Town is stifling our growth with not listening to what the community needs. Southeast attitude towards business Southeast attitude towards business Southeast attitude towards business Space and keeping area cluster free and traffic moving Speed limit is too fast difficult to get on and off 22, Storm water .. Such a variety already exists Taxes Taxes The board can be difficult to get things passed or approved The downturn in the economy is the main barrier to new business development. In particular, many physical retail establishments have closed and are unlikely to open again because more people are enjoying the convenience, economy, and safety of online shopping. This is unlikely to change. The environment would change and ruin plant growth and wildlife. The merge in front of Enterprise going south is dangerous. Frequent road rage incidents. There needs to be a 2nd lane throughout The NYC watershed regulations. Now that sewer is available via Danbury, uses should be amended. The oldtimers The people that live in the area that do not want progress The poor condition of the roadway of route 22 north of the Elks lodge up to Putnam Lake Road The road is out of date for current traffic flow and NYC and NYS won't approve improvements The road is too small for current traffic. It is in desperate need of turning lanes an more lanes. There is more and more traffic from Connecticut. The road isn't wide enough to accommodate separate turn lanes. Traffic backs up behind vehicles waiting to turn and has caused accidents. The road needs to be widened. It is a safety issue. There are two many people trying to turn left and cause traffic jams. 22 between Milltown Road and Route 312 is a bottle neck! The single lane along the corridor from 684 to patterson. Its a bottle neck and NYC has to much control over our town because of the watershed. Tony Hay and the zoning and town board are mediocre at best. The town and 1 lane roads The Town Board should be more welcoming of new businesses and allow for bigger signage. Some restrictions to new businesses chase interested parties away. The Town of Southeast and their permit policies! Notoriously difficult to deal with from what I’ve heard from small business owners. Almost like they don’t want to encourage new places to open. The Town of Southeast and their permit policies! Notoriously difficult to deal with from what I’ve heard from small business owners. Almost like they don’t want to encourage new places to open. The towns refusal to allow these businesses in The traffic and unsafe conditions. As of now I avoid Route 22 as much as possible during the day because of the traffic and unsafe conditions caused by people coming into and out of the various businesses along the corridor , especially the strip from the ACME parking lot to route 312. Town of Southeast Planning Board 21 September 25, 2020 The traffic can prevent you from visiting the businesses. There is already a lot of commuting traffic mixes with the retail traffic which makes it difficult during key times to get places. Business types need to be varied to bring more to Brewster instead of having to go to Danbury, but road way planning must be in place. There is enough development there aldeady. There is increasing traffic on 22 especially where 684 narrows to 1 lane as 22 begins and then backs up from Milltown light and again backup from Clock Tower light and again before Doanburg Rd. Living in Brewster Woods it can take quite a while to pull out of the complex due to traffic. There is no character to the corridor; it looks very ragtag, not compelling. My husband opened a business last year and of course we would have wished to have it close to home, but other places are more attractive. There's only two lanes which really discourages me from even going there during rush hours times (8 - 10am and 4-6pm) because it gets clogs up all the way down to 684 and up into Patterson. thin corridor between 2 reservoirs is not a good place to have a business district Too busy right now. Too crowded with Traffic congestion Needs better control of speed limits. Could look better it is an eyesore. We live in a beautiful place we should espouse a more beautiful looking area there and elsewhere. Our area is unkempt in lots of places looking like a dump. Too difficult, expensive and time consuming to get town permits. Too many restrictions Too many traffic lights Too much red tape. Too much traffic close to 684 too much traffic, no need for more retail, brick & mortar stores declining most people shop online, we have high end super market in nearby danbury Too much traffic. Unable to make safe left hand turns Town Town board approvals and outdated regulations restrict new businesses from opening. Town board approvals and outdated regulations restrict new businesses from opening. Town board approvals and outdated regulations restrict new businesses from opening. Town board approvals and outdated regulations restrict new businesses from opening. Town board approvals and outdated regulations restrict new businesses from opening. Town board approvals and outdated regulations restrict new businesses from opening. Town board approvals and outdated regulations restrict new businesses from opening. Town board approvals and outdated regulations restrict new businesses from opening. Town codes and watershed. Town fighting change and sewage/septic capacity Town government who make it too hard for business to operate and residents who don’t like change. Would need to be expanded for turning lanes Town of Southeast politics Town of Southeast red tape roadblocks Towns folk who do not want change. TRAFFIC Traffic Traffic traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Town of Southeast Planning Board 22 September 25, 2020 Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic - your prior question should have discerned between "rush hour" in the AM/PM and non-rush hour because there is a big difference Traffic !!! Traffic backups, increasing trucks usage, Connecticut drivers catching rt. 84 and an increase of drivers from the north catching rt. 684. Keep trafficat a minimum please traffic congestion. Difficult to build along watershed. Takes a long time to build due to regulations traffic crossings Traffic during drive times; strip mall aesthetics Traffic during peak hours, buses during school hours, businesses not keeping with the environment and visual country appeal of Southeast (the roads look unappealing, not welcoming, no landscaping/trees, very bare and ugly). Also Milltown Road has too many fast drivers speeding from CT on their way to/from Brewster. Also there is no real "center" of focus, just random businesses that dont have same look and feel. traffic during rush hour and weekends Traffic Flow Traffic flow at rush hours am and pm. Making left turns are very difficult without traffic lights. Traffic flow during construction Traffic from 684 north, and traffic coming south on 22 from the north.......... Traffic is already heavy along 22 between 684 and Rte 312. Adding additional businesses and/or high - volume housing will significantly worsen traffic. Traffic on 22 during rush hour Traffic pattern- too much traffic stop and go for just two lanes Traffic patterns. Need turn lanes, traffic lights. Traffic was getting heavier until Covid hit. Now more people are working from home so businesses people need to go to are what’s needed. There are plenty of empty offices and storefronts needing filling so there should be NO push to build more. Traffic which cannot sustain too much more development. Traffic, difficulty making left hand turns. Need more traffic lights. Traffic, depressed economy Traffic, having to cross over lanes Traffic, noise and pollution. Traffic on side roads. Rt 22 cannot handle more traffic. Traffic, septic, water, Traffic, some business are hard to get in or out of when turning onto Rt. 22 Traffic, taxes, limited population Traffic. 22 needs more lanes including turning lanes. Traffic. No ability to exit retail and get into opposite lane. Traffic. The problem is if you improve Rt. 22, you will invite more business, which will invite more traffic. The additional traffic will cancel out the improvement of Rt. 22. Also the 2nd light at the shopping center (not the one opposite Clocktower Commons) should be eliminated. traffid Turning difficult way too much traffic to make a turn on the southside lane going north. There should be U-turn sections. They have these on Central Avenue in Yonkers. speed limit should be lowered. You should have walkways and crosswalks. Turning in and out safely of parking lots. Sufficient parking. Road safety Turning north or south on 22 without a traffic light. Turning on and off Route 22 into and from businesses Turning on and off Route 22 into and from businesses Town of Southeast Planning Board 23 September 25, 2020 Turning on to 22 or into business. turns cross traffic causing unsafe conditions Unsure but as a new resident it would be great to see some modernization. It’s a bit run down. Until you can control access to businesses on Route 22, expansion should be limited to fewer access points; frontage road connecting all of the parking lots would help the traffic flow on Route 22. Currently drivers making left hand turns, either from Route 22 or onto Route 22, create hazardous driving conditions. Also septic issues need to be addressed in that area. Utilities water and sewer, School taxes Utilities water and sewer, School taxes Very busy road with lots of tractor trailers and it’s difficult to leave some parking lots (make left handed turn) in some areas Water and sewage problems and traffic. Watershed, dealing with increased traffic watershed, making left turns. We don’t need anymore traffic on 22. Already many empty store fronts. We have plenty of empty new construction already in Southeast (ex - near Duncan Donuts rt22 & starr ridge rd) or old empty buildings that no one wants (Chevy dealer, Wings and Flying Things, Norms). Fix the old buildings and populate those! No need to pad the pockets of more builders who don't care if they remain empty. Set up good recreation spots for the residents of Southeast - parks and indoor rec center like Ridgefield CT. Not a Leplerville of construction, no empty stores or worse - stores that no one wants - more dollar stores and low end retail. Make Southeast a place for families and residents that will be attracted to live in. We pay high taxes but with none of the amenities that nearby Westchester neighbors have. Weekend Traffic during the summer Wetland restrictions Wetlands wetlands are always a problem. Impervious topping, DOT access fro driveways, creating traffic congestion. When creating a new downtown center you want to be able to encourage foot traffic which could be difficult along Route 22. I still believe the village of brewster is the ideal location for a revitalization project because of the train station. Look at Easton, Pa as an example of what a revitalized downtown can look like. When creating a new downtown center you want to be able to encourage foot traffic which could be difficult along Route 22. I still believe the village of brewster is the ideal location for a revitalization project because of the train station. Look at Easton, Pa as an example of what a revitalized downtown can look like. When creating a new downtown center you want to be able to encourage foot traffic which could be difficult along Route 22. I still believe the village of brewster is the ideal location for a revitalization project because of the train station. Look at Easton, Pa as an example of what a revitalized downtown can look like. Wrong businesses going in, poor overall planning zoning and lack of waste water treatment Zoning and Sewer Zoning restrictions & interminable waiting for approvement Zoning restrictions; lack of water sources and wastewater treatment solutions Zoning. It zigzags across route 22.Making one business legal on one side of the road but directly across the road not legal. The zoning in the area is unfair and doesn’t really make any sense Town of Southeast Planning Board 24 September 25, 2020 Question 2: What are your visions and goals for Route 22? Would like to see a Chop’t salad restaurant and/or a Salsa Fresca in the Lakeview shopping center or close by. Healthy fast meal choices close by. Without driving to Carmel or Danbury. 2 lanes each way from 684 to Patterson 35 mph, low impact light business and residencial 4 lanes A bike path from Patterson to sodom road A bustling road with a mix of businesses and or condos A cozy downtown area with environmentally friendly activities for the community. A cozy downtown area with environmentally friendly activities for the community. A destination spot for people from around the hudson valley A few new stores, not the whole strip A good mix of retail and housing; create a walkable retail district; there is no retail in the area; nor are there very many good restaurants A large public pool with water slides, diving boards, spray park, etc. For Putnam county residents only. There would no longer be issues with algae blooms and such from our lakes. Hiking trails with obstacle courses. Yearly permit to offset maintenance costs. On-site concession stands from local businesses not chain restaurants. A more aesthetic look A nice new updated area with restaurants and shopping A pleasant safe and sightly view A slightly more commercial but inviting vive a traffic light at the c/o 22 and old Milltown which is blinking yellow except for rush hour would serve to break up the traffic flow. and a road marked turning lane from n/b 684/22 to e/b Sodom rd A walkable, bikeable low-slung downtown with shops, restaurants, theaters, a playground and off- street parking Added lanes. Added traffic lanes only for better flow of traffic Additional Greenspace - for example a park, would be great. Affordable apartments for Millennials/young families (mixed use, above shops), various small businesses as opposed to big box stores, better flow of traffic (currently hazardous during rush hour, impossible to make left hand turns out of parking lots), no more storage facilities An additional lane on each side. Any further development on Route 22 must not cause additional travel delays that are burdensome at many times. Development must also preserve the rural character of the town. Route 22 should not appear to be a continuous, miles-long stretch of built-up properties. Attractive commerce That will bring revenue to the town and interest in new families moving to the area Attractive use such as Clocktower Commons! No ugly strip malls please! Attractive signage and landscaping; open spaces; intelligent consideration of traffic flow. Beautification -Add more upscale areas with sitting and walkable areas. Make areas more quaint. Beautification/ cleanup. A light is needed at Sodom Rd./ 22 intersection. Besides the design being consistent with a New England type feel, I’d like to see family friendly stores with mixed restaurants as well as doctors offices , hotels and community recreation better architecture in any new building, nothing is visually appealing or cohesive Better connection from 684 to 22 and more business development. Town of Southeast Planning Board 25 September 25, 2020 Better flow of reentering 22 from businesses regardless of traveling north or south ; ability to cross 22 safely as a pedestrian; create alternate routes for commuters Better shopping so I don't have to travel to Danbury/Brookfield. Also, at least one gas station that has a decent price per gallon. I buy all my gas in CT. I don't remember the last time I bought gas in Brewster. Better tax base Better traffic control, residential areas are overcome by the traffic, roads can't handle the flow Better traffic flow, shopping, good restaurants - fresh fish dishes. Outdoor theatre, yoga space BIG BOX STORES, RETAIL OUTLETS Bring additional high paying jobs to the area, increase tax base. Bring it to life. That road is so run down with so much open space. Bring in new restaurant options, fast food places, things to do. Clear out that wooded area by red rooster and actually do something with it. Bring more entertainment/sports complex/mixed-use developments to Route 22. bring more housing, recreation and retail Bring more people to the area with building multi-family properties that will boost everything else. We need more bodies in the area to shop and work. The only way we can accomplish that is by encouraging building of apartments Bring new business and be attractive to new people to move to our areas with a new vision and provide a clean and peaceful life style with new technology and new building designs, parks and more activities to do for our kids, that will bring our houses to raised the value, and we can be the sample of healthy environment... Build a reason for people to go to rt22. Build a wegmans or Costco and you will get so much more business in the area. Get a chick fila and that too will bring in money. Clock tower is an awesome place but it should have more retail and shops. The clock tower grill is great but walk around shops with ice cream store, etc. would make it a place to go and walk, eat and shop. There currently is little reason for me a southeast resident that lives closer to Carmel to go to rt22. Acme is horrible, and outside of a few good restaurants (clock tower, Aversanos, fiesta Mexicana)there is no reason to go there and spend money. I spend most of my money in Connecticut unfortunately. Building recreation and more food options Business expansion and development By pass route and then add more business Center turn lanes. Traffic light at Sodom Rd. Chaos clean up what is there already Clean, visually interesting diversity of businesses and affordable housing for our community; manages traffic smartly, but doesn't turn into another major highway Clearly focused on family-friendly entities: we need a good recreation center (like Ridgefield Rec). We need nice looking businesses--not "Karen's" (I know, Pawling, but still) or McDonald's or what? there is so little to stop for. Please something a with a little class, something inviting. Community and family focused, diversity and smaller town charm. Unique businesses vs big box community center would be excellent. Concentrated development not sprawl! Costco , Real Hotel. Good quality Restaurant Retail stores Creat jobs, enhance quality of life, and ensure safety for the community. Creat jobs, enhance quality of life, and ensure safety for the community. Create a downtown, with movies, arcade, boutique shopping and small green spaces to sit and enjoy your ice cream. A place to go to in the evening to meet friends for outdoor concerts instead of going to Mahopac or Danbury. Keep Very limited housing and add enough sidewalks not to be runoff by cars. And important too is to improve and current supermarket plaza. More sidewalks from parking to stores and more landscaping Town of Southeast Planning Board 26 September 25, 2020 Divert excess drive-through traffic around Route 22 Do things that benefit the existing community. Sports, Shooting ranges, child and elder care, florists, places for adults to socialize that aren't bars. Double lanes . More restaurants, recreational facilities.. possibly a larger corporation to assist in the tax burden. Drive in movie theater where golf dome was; indoor/outdoor sports complex Ease traffic flow Encourage reuse of existing buildings before new construction is considered Establishments that will benefit our residents so we can shop local, but not too commercial and industrial. Family friendly , town like feel ! Walking space Family friendly entertainment, outdoor dining, entertainment family friendly, make use of the space to enhance the community Family Recreation , drive in Movie theater, hotels Family Recreation , drive in Movie theater, hotels Family, Community, & Climate friendly forward thinking. Access roads, parallel to 22, for parking & border landscaping, to allow community and travelers to experience shaded walkways to various LOCAL businesses. An enlarged 'downtown' feeling, incorporating the reservoirs and wetlands with nature trails. Fewer strip malls, more walkable areas for a variety of small businesses, public/family gathering places Fix unsightly properties that are left unattended. These have been eyesores for many years now. Fix unsightly properties that are left unattended. These have been eyesores for many years now. Fix unsightly properties that are left unattended. These have been eyesores for many years now. Fix unsightly properties that are left unattended. These have been eyesores for many years now. Fix unsightly properties that are left unattended. These have been eyesores for many years now. Fix unsightly properties that are left unattended. These have been eyesores for many years now. Fix unsightly properties that are left unattended. These have been eyesores for many years now. Fix unsightly properties that are left unattended. These have been eyesores for many years now. Focus on resident life activities - parks and a rec center. Focus on the Village redevelopment first For it to be a "business bypass" and create a 684 bypass to go up to Patterson, or further. A majority of traffic going through this area is headed points north/south. Anyone who needs gas, or McDonalds or Burger King can go through the business bypass and everyone else can keep moving. Reduced truck traffic less noise=jake braking. Free flow of traffic through the corridor which is safe and allows for existing businesses to survive. free flow of traffic with ability to make turns free flow of traffic with controlled increased commerce Free flowing traffic, on safe, modern roadway at reasonable speed limit. Current 35mph limit too slow for amount of retail directly on Route 22. From 684 to Clocktower, there are residential properties and should be left as is. From Clocktower to Doansburg Road, we have more than enough businesses but some areas could use cleaning up. Red Rooster did a great job with their reno & the gas stations also seem to try and make their properties look nice. We don’t need added buildings. Route 6 near Danbury border is already doing that an d it will be interesting to see what moves in there. Fully developed on both sides. General beautification - Green space by bull n barrel and elsewhere - resurrection of “norms” bar - and that Eyesore white building right by 684 Get restaurants other than pizza. New businesses. Dump ACME. Build community events and retail. Something like Ridgefield has. Get rid of the section 8 motels and develop more businesses Get us a better grocery store than Acme. Town of Southeast Planning Board 27 September 25, 2020 Get us a better grocery store than Acme. Growth and tax revenue growth with smart traffic patterns Housing and support for housing (grocery, daycare, restaurants) there are some beautiful views that are blocked by Acme grocery and the highway department. I can't see anyway to encourage traffic flow but a more active main street area like Mill Plain Road would be helpful to the town but I can't imagine people wanting to go there more or live there if traffic flow isn't improved. I have lived here for 55 years and seen numerous proposals for widening route 22. It's past the time to fish or cut bait. Before you do any building, first you MUST widen the road. I would encourage the siting of any new buildings to take advantage of the natural surroundings. Case in point, Lakeview Plaza has a reservoir behind the building. If the building were oriented in a different way more people could enjoy the natural resources of our town. Also putting parking lots at the rear of the building and creating a walkable community environment with sustainable landscaping/street scoping that enhances the property. I would like it to be attractive, family friendly businesses that include developing industries. I would like more family entertainment facilities I would like to see a nicely planned and landscaped development that possibly links the West side of 22 with a pedestrian bridge or something like that. Pedestrian sidewalks and paths would also be encouraged. I would like to see a sensible rural type businesses meaning businesses spaced apart with a rural type appearance and proper development of RT22 highway to facilitate traffic I would like to see more restaurants that are affordable. I would like to see more shopping in Lake Shopping center on 22 rather than all the empty stores and maybe more restaurants without making 22 into a Mill Plain Road in Danbury. When we moved here, it was to avoid that especially since our condo unit backs up to 22 and the noise would be much worse causing need to just keep windows closed due to traffic. Further up 22 maybe between 312/22 and Doansburg where it isn't residential if something commercial was added there including a drivein movie theatre on 22. Having a sports complex/gym might be nice and store like Home Goods further up where there is more commercial. Traffic and truck noise, with adding more businesses, I fear will become much worse from 684 north but if above 312/22 where it is north of residential, then perhaps some traffic will be coming from 312. I would like to see route 22 be expanded to a 4 lane pattern to ease the flow I would like to see Route 22 maintained as a "rural route" to the extent possible. I would like to see the road widened a bit and a center turning lane added which will reduce traffic and make it safer for people entering and exiting the businesses along the route. I am surprised we do not have more accidents along the strip from ClockTower Commons and Old Doansburg Road. I would love a walkable area in the Town of Southeast! Mom and Pop stores with real ties to the community, less soulless chain-stores. This area has an opportunity to attract the younger generation and younger families and if you encourage places like cafes (fast casual dining like the excellent Wandering Dave’s) and coffeehouses, add an arts venue (or fund the Cultural Arts Coalition in the village which could become a cultural ICON in this area if the town would help it out more and not interfere with what gets put on there), the younger generation could have a reason to be out and about more often here, and not all run away to cooler places like Beacon or Cold Spring. We need a walkable town center with unique mom and pop places, dare I say “cool” stores and cafes. That will attract those commuters you’ve been after for years. I would love a walkable area in the Town of Southeast! Mom and Pop stores with real ties to the community, less soulless chain-stores. This area has an opportunity to attract the younger generation and younger families and if you encourage places like cafes (fast casual dining like the excellent Wandering Dave’s) and coffeehouses, add an arts venue (or fund the Cultural Arts Coalition in the village which could become a cultural ICON in this area if the town would help it out more and not Town of Southeast Planning Board 28 September 25, 2020 interfere with what gets put on there), the younger generation could have a reason to be out and about more often here, and not all run away to cooler places like Beacon or Cold Spring. We need a walkable town center with unique mom and pop places, dare I say “cool” stores and cafes. That will attract those commuters you’ve been after for years. I would love to see a Costco/bjs or a good grocery store. A target would be great too. Just no more pizza, nail, auto part stores- I would love to see it more like Mill Plain Rd in Danbury and Federal Rd in Danbury/Brookfield. A shopping destination. I’d like to see a variety of stores/restaurants/recreation added to Route 22 with a thoughtful plan put in place with pedestrian and driver safety at the forefront. I’d like to see our town produce tax dollars. Wouldn’t it be nice to have our own stores, target, decent groceries, restaurants and recreation in our own community like other towns. We go elsewhere such as Carmel, Kent and ct. to do things. I’d love to see a park, walking trails, hiking trails across from ACME where old golf done was - from clock tower commons to red rooster. Maybe a sports field for soccer and lacrosse and other sports. I’d love to see it become the hub of commerce in our community. With entertainment retail restaurants and service industries all conveniently located in one easily accessible road. It would also be nice to bring some bigger business into the area that would Westchester and Connecticut shoppers into our area giving us much need to tax revenue. I'd love to see major retail - big box, department stores and hotels. Improve restaurant, retail and service industry options for residents while not adding significant numbers of new residents as our booming village population has already overcrowded schools. I would like to see the small town feeling maintained and avoid development of big box stores like Walmart. Improve traffic flow Improved traffic flow and safety Increase greenspace Independent Restaurants and retail shopping that are relevant and current in today’s environment. And a fresh and inviting appearance. Industry to feed the community and lessen residential tax burden It should become generally known as the center of the Town of Southeast (not Brewster) and made much more attractive and inviting to residents and visitors. it needs to be branded as "Southeast" The addition of more recreational uses or pedestrian and bike friendly parks. It would be nice to have some retail stores such as Target, Trader Joes etc. Smaller family run business always a bonus. Restaurants are lacking. Only choices are pizza and mexican, it would be nice to have some variety of dining It would beneficial to have two lanes both North and South bound directions to improve traffic flow and enable easier access in and out of commercial parking lots that are not controlled by traffic light. More commercial / retail space with the hopes that it helps support tax base. Some recreational areas would be a great balance. It would wonderful if it was enclaves of walkable little shopping areas with quaint New England style boutiques, similar to Clock Tower. It would wonderful if it was enclaves of walkable little shopping areas with quaint New England style boutiques, similar to Clock Tower. Keep as much green space as possible Keep commercial Keep it as the business corridor. Work with DOT to improve traffic flow. Keeping small town feel. No multiple family dwellings. Leave as is. Left turn lanes; not overly developed; a park Less congestion and mess. More places that help Brewster residents like recreation, arts, parks... Town of Southeast Planning Board 29 September 25, 2020 Less strip malls & more open space Less traffic Life Light business district. Mostly small business. Establishments that bring light traffic. Local recreation and local businesses. We really need a nice large facility for outdoor recreation just for Brewster/Southeast residents look more like Federal Road - a place where families can shop, eat and find entertainment - keep NY in NY and stop going to CT for everything Lots of Bars, Restaurants and entertainment Lots of Bars, Restaurants and entertainment Lots of Bars, Restaurants and entertainment Lower speed limit Main thoroughfare Maintain natural land Make better use of spaces that have been left unattended and have become eye sores. This is not welcoming at all. Make it a mini silicon valley Make it just a bit wider, reduce traffic, keep businesses as is, develop where there is space but limit as it will then take away the beauty of Southeast and become what Rockland County became...way too much traffic, thefts, accidents and homeless people. make it more "free flowing" (e.g., more turning lines or perhaps jug handles Make it more family friendly, more things for families to do together Make it prettier Middle turn lane (even as far north as old rte 22), cohesive anesthetics among buildings, variety of restaurants to include healthy fast food, gourmet/specialty shops and stores. Smart landscaping is a must! Minimal development mix of land preservation such as nursery/landscape/farmers market and businesses, maybe a park Mixed use, various business types. Not strip mall style. Mixed-use, planned development with architectural integrity More business and professional buildings More business and professional buildings More business so I do not have to go to ct to shop and southeast can get the tax revenue. No new houses or apartments. More business that support activities for adolescents and teens. More business, housing and city like feeling More businesses More businesses (i.e) costco More businesses (i.e) costco More businesses to cater to our community versus traveling to CT for more products unavailable in town. More community activities built into existing infrastructure. Less chains, fewer generic "shops" and ugly stripmalls. More convenient shopping options. Presently need to go to Danbury for most shopping. More family entertainment. Farmers markets More family friendly businesses More fun attractions for families More lanes. Turning lanes. Easier access to 684. More multi-family housing More nurseries and restaurants Town of Southeast Planning Board 30 September 25, 2020 More recreation , restaurants and better retail More restaurants Small shops More restaurants and family attractions More restaurants and family attractions More restaurants and shopping. Proper movie theatre. More restaurants beside pizza & bar food. Ex chick-fil-a, chipotle, steak/seafood restaurant, ihop, Jersey mikes More restaurants, coffee shops, diners, Gyms, more entertainment maybe a local catering hall that does weddings there isn’t one around here. Hotel More retail More retail of all sort More Retail Shopping - not Walmart. Boutique stores. Entertainment venues. More retail shopping options to prevent our taxes dollars from going to Connecticut. more retail, recreation More retail. Should be a big box store located on the property at the old golf dome across from acme shopping center. More services for local residents. Give the corridor a "Ridgefield" look. more shopping and restaurants. Brewster has little to offer for family restaurants and shopping besides Marshalls and Kohls and forces residents to go to Danbury. More shopping options/restaurants/outdoor spaces/greenspace More stores available rather than shopping in Connecticut More stores available rather than shopping in Connecticut More than just fast food/pizza restaurants. Fun places (play places) for families More variety of business, but spaced out and maintaining some green space. Avoid the traffic and visual nightmare of Mill Plain Rd in Danbury. Multi lane with turning lanes multi-lane road with good traffic patterns, and competitive shopping similar to what exists on our Connecticut border. My vision for Route 22 is that is becomes a destination for residents of Southeast/Brewster as well as nearby to live, shop and enjoy. We currently need to travel across to Connecticut to do most of our shopping and would love to contribute to our local business. I hope that in the near future we can have access to so many available business and services like our neighbors in Danbury/Brookfield/Bethel as well as Mt. Kisco do. Outdoor spaces and parks, better designed and updated, shopping centers, both locally owned and major retailers would be a perk! It would benefit everyone-young and old and I believe that this would make Southeast/Brewster more attractive to the younger generation! Need more choices of restaurants, we have enough pizza & bar food Chick-fil-a, Jersey Mike’s, ihop, chipotle would be nice. No more gas stations or storage units Need to maintain healthy ecosystem and country atmosphere. Need to educate people of the importance of maintaining that. Why move here for that aspect only to change it to be more city-like. My neighbor came from Yonkers and complains about trees and critters in her yard. She doesn’t understand their importance to her clean water and air. She sprays insecticides to kill ladybugs!! We need to maintain the healthy ecosystems along route 22. Perhaps make them eco friendly eco parks!!! New downtown of Brewster New downtown of Brewster Nice strip malls set back from the road with shops and restaurants No additional strip malls. No additional gas stations. Recreation businesses would be nice (similar to Red Rooster mini-golf). A permanent farmer's market. Music theater. No box stores, please. Pleasant housing set back off 22, Medical offices, etc. No destinations along Route 22 corridor that add to traffic No more development. We have plenty of buildings that need tenants. No more gas stations or fast food restaurants Town of Southeast Planning Board 31 September 25, 2020 No or very limited business development. No additional housing of any kind. Restoration of the look of a rural road to promote: "Putnam - where the Country begins." no vacant stores, more multi family, more uses that draw, a nice attractive, busy area Oils like to see a couple of hotels and more entertainment for the children of the community Open useable space mixed with family friendly enterprises Pave over Perhaps putting a little more "curb appeal" into any new businesses Physically attractive, clean businesses (like Tompkins mhopac Bank) and some residential or residential-like bsns such as elder care or multifamily dwellings Proper walkways, bike paths, environmentally friendly Proper walkways, bike paths, environmentally friendly Provide recreation and some entertainment (playhouse,theater?). Senior housing. put in addition lanes from i684 to 312 quicker travel during business hours mire trees around businesses Recreation and performing arts/theater venues. Perhaps a higher education facility. recreation for the community Rejuvenate it, add more spaces that will attract younger audiences. Clean it up! Make our town more presentable. Residential and light retail Retail Retail, bike lanes, underground utilities, sewer, central water, fire hydrants. Retail, Such as a target, restaurants both family and fine cafe type ( no pizza, deli fast food), brand hotel, recreational facility for town members. Small centers mix of medical dental, cafe and retail and Clean national chain grocery store . Retain suburban vibe while expanding restaurant and retail options. Revitalize the village Road safety, more restaurants Route22 is becoming the Central Avenue of Southeast. Some of the properties should be cleaned up and used for vest pocket parks. In general, Route 22 is becoming junkie looking. RT 22 could become more of a hub for the local area if careful planning is put in place. We should development carefully and responsibly to keep the integrity of a "small" town. Please do not select businesses just to get them here, but look at what makes sense for the community as a whole and will not make major problems in the long run. Since it is a major route north, it should be more attractive to tourists. The Red Rooster is a destination. There should be other fun destinations where the land is available. Slow development. Don't want to see rt 22 turned into the chaos of rt 9 Slower speed limit through residential and commercial lengths of 22 Small shops,restaurants , family square, entertainment Smart Sustainable Growth Some development of the abandoned properties into small businesses or small strip malls, recreation facilities and entertainment venues. No malls or big box stores. some development, but keep the rural, green character. Some nice shopping & recreational areas. Also Costco and Target would be nice. So more shopping possible & tax $ to local area vs. going to CT. Some recreational areas for youth Something that will help the tax base in Southeast Southeast/Brewster has so much potential. There should be a town center that people can go to dine, sit at a coffee shop, shop retail and go to the theater or an art gallery. Southeast also has a wonderful place to put a public pool, the old tennis complex or whatever it was across form ACME. It is a shame that there are no public pools in Putnam County. Not everyone can have a pool at their house, it would be a place for all to enjoy, young and old. Town of Southeast Planning Board 32 September 25, 2020 sports centers, drive thru dunkin, car dealership, a southeast best of market STATE JUST REPAVED. NEED SPEED REDUCTION COMING OFF 684 TO 45 BEFORE IT CHANGES TO 35 BY VIRGINIA WOODS CONDOS Stop building. There are many empty building already. It has enough . Sustainable development that does not increase continual traffic flow. Office buildings, for example. Or just leave it alone. Sustainable growth and development Target Tax producing businesses. Tax producing businesses. Tax producing businesses. The area across from M&T bank should be developed into something we can all be proud of and use. A park with a playground or retail shops to encourage job growth and tax revenue. the area where the Golf Dome used to be would be ideal for retail (Target) there is enough traffic flow its already congested. Another traffic lane would be nice but no addition of stires/commerce/housing along route 22. There needs to be a center turning lane and keep traffic moving. Don’t bottleneck 684 to 22. There really isn't much land for development, a few small parcels This stretch of Route 22 should be our go to place for commercial and retail businesses with restaurants and hotels. Thriving business with ease of driving through. To add income to our tax base while also keeping a natural environmental look to be more than a place that people just pass through To create a small town where all your shopping needs are right here in Brewster. To create a small town where all your shopping needs are right here in Brewster. To develop a walkable community feel, truly small town, throughout the length and breadth of the corridor. To have a visually appealing, fitting for the rural and picturesque town of Southeast that has a center of focus for people to go and shop at local stores, eat at a local restaurant, and have some aspect of country environment (bike trails, walkways, recreation). Please do not over commercialize. Dog friendly would also be nice! It would be great to have a town park where people could enjoy open space with walking, trails, picnics, etc. To help keep the Traffic from going too fast during the Work rush hours. To hold onto businesses already there (Red Rooster and many more) while utilizing retail parcels that have been abandoned. Any new use should enhance the corridor and not tie it up with what belongs on a major thoroughfare, not Route 22. The town also needs to maintain open space that cannot handle development or is near protected areas like Bog Brook. To not be in traffic everyday going north on route 22 in the afternoon and evening and some in the morning hours. To have consistent and strong cell service throughout the entire route 22. To remain as is. To see more successful retail and restaurant opportunities so we don’t have to go to Danbury ct for everything To widen road so local traffic can pass smoothly traffic shouldn't be any heavier than it is now. Turning lanes, widen. Make a right turn lane on 312 to 22. Two lanes Two lanes all the way through town to 684 Two lanes traffic each direction. No left hand turns allowed except at traffic lights with a turn lane. Two lanes traffic each direction. No left hand turns allowed except at traffic lights with a turn lane. Two strip mall is enough. Reduce or stop any construction of malls. Town of Southeast Planning Board 33 September 25, 2020 Unimpeded traffic flow during peak travel times, development focused on local residents and commuters. Unless the traffic flow problem is fixed, there should be no new development. Up scaling it and making it more available for young families update scattered appearance--better planning for aesthetic reasons Upgrade what is already there upscale retail and restaurants with sidewalks and gazebo like main street in southbury CT Vibrant retail/commercial/condo We have a huge elder population. They need facilities to go to and easy access to stores. We need more retail locations in our area. We must leave NY and head to Danbury for most big shopping needs. We need more- a big box store, more chain drive thrus, boutiques... We need MORE RETAIL to offset skyrocketing taxes! Our school ratings are terrible in regards to how much we pay in taxes. Say NO to low income/affordable housing. Clean up Main Street and Rt 22 to make it desirable boutiques, shopping, restaurants, nightlife and Create a better rye 22/downtown area (much like what Ridgefield has). There is so much wasted opportunities in this area. We have the train stations that allow residents to get to high paying jobs in NYC but those people don’t want to live here because this is a depressed area with nothing to do. We have no Rec center for the children and this town has zero shopping or boutiques. So much wasted potential. Needs to get with the times While we need growth, I’m saddened that we don’t have a “ quaint village” where you can park & find unique shops, dining, coffee shop, such as Pawling Widen for rush hour traffic Widen for rush hour traffic Widen it, make 2 lanes in each direction. Add additional traffic lights but have them work in a synchronized fashion. Add additional retail. Widen road with new businesses encouraged Widening without a barrier Wider roads Wider to accommodate businesses Wider to accommodate businesses Wider to accommodate businesses Wider variety of services. Especially for younger populations; children/young adults would love to see a costco, target, BJs stop n shop (acme is awful) I do 90% of my shopping in CT. There is only so much you can get at kohls & home depot Would love to see all the shuttered businesses opened. Town of Southeast Planning Board 34 September 25, 2020 Question 3: Aside from traffic, what improvements (e.g. infrastructure, streetscape, sidewalks, etc.) would you like to see along the Route 22 corridor? infrastructure, streetscape, sidewalks, and good traffic flow 2 lane road and/or u-turn sections. 4 lanes traffic 4 lanes traffic 4 lanes traffic 4 lanes. 55+ houses reasonably priced for residents of Southeast that would like to stay in there community. High end Restruants, B&B bring in people that are going to ski areas,Appalanian trail so many beautiful and historical area around Southeast. Please try an incorporate. Thank 55+ houses reasonably priced for residents of Southeast that would like to stay in there community. High end Restruants, B&B bring in people that are going to ski areas,Appalanian trail so many beautiful and historical area around Southeast. Please try an incorporate. Thank a bike lane A climate action plan to elevate or push our thinking, and to include landscaping, or renewable energies, to set this portion of Rt 22 apart from each successive town's (north of Southeast) commercial development centers on Rt 22. A couple of restaurants would be nice A fresh and inviting appearance that is relevant and current to today’s environment. Sidewalks, landscaping, seasonal decorating, outdoor dining. A fully connected sidewalk would be nice A park for residents to enjoy A standard for architectural development, along with signage. A town recreational center,town pool/library similar to somers/katonaha/pleasantville A walking sidewalk should be safe and continuous from Doansburg to Sodom road Add sidewalks and lighting. Maintain green space bordering the road. Minimize the visibility of parking lots by locating them behind businesses. Additions that are practical, aesthetically pleasing, and not harmful to the environment. additonal lane of traffic between Miltown road and Route 312 An additional lane on each side and side walks An improved streetscape An open area of parkland on parcels with poor septic capability would be great... perhaps on the east side of Route 22 across from all the stores (Acme etc.). Another traffic lane would be nice. Areas around the reservoirs to dine or view outdoor Vistas. Acme shopping plaza is ugly and needs better layout and more unique shops & culture. As mentioned above, a pedestrian bridge would be nice. Assisted living Attention to streetscape. Beautification/cleanup. Beautifying rte 22 with potential capability of adding holiday decor to lamp posts, seasonal flowers, etc. creating a safe and beautiful rte 22. Better lighting, traditional curbing and drainage, lessen grade on area by Ski Haus (becomes a bottleneck with larger vehicles). Make extreme right lane southbound before Route 312 (Kelly’s Corner) right turn only during rush hour, too many vehicles use it to attempt to zoom ahead of traffic and prevent commuters from making Town of Southeast Planning Board 35 September 25, 2020 a right on red at the traffic light. Raise speed limit to 40-45 mph from Milltown Road to Doansburg Road. Raise speed limit to 45-50 mph from Town Hall to Milltown Road. Add dedicated turn lane from Route 312 to Route 22 southbound. Better paving Better signage and street scaping (decorative lights, community greetings, etc) Create sidewalks and bike lanes Better signage and street scaping (decorative lights, community greetings, etc) Create sidewalks and bike lanes Bicycle Lanes, Sidewalks, Bus Stops and Landscaping. Bicycle/walking access Bike lane Bike lanes bike lanes and sidewalks Bike lanes, sidewalks Bike lanes, sidewalks, trees, small businesses Buried utility lines Burry the power lines and paint illuminated lines on the road with reflectors. Burying overhead utility lines underground; following the guidelines suggested for the comprehensive plan and our town code and by encouraging developers to create the best possible project, even if it means spending more resources on the final outcome. Too often I have seen SE Boards overly concerned with the amount of money developers spend on projects. Developers are fully aware of their bottom line. Most residents of the town are completely unaware of a project until it is too late and the project has been approved and built. It is time for all of our board members to act 'as if' every project is in their back yard. Can a vegetative buffer zone be created between Route 22 and future developments. Not sure having a sidewalk built along Route 22 would be utilized. Center Island dividing north- south traffic flow Clean paved roads. Unused areas that are landscaped Clean up rte 22. It looks outdated, tired, and a place nobody wants to stop or has a reason to stop. More like drive through as quick as you can. Imagine seeing side walks, people walking dogs, bike riders, boutique stores, restaurants with outdoor seating, beautiful street lamps, a park with kids playing or concerts during the summer. Cleaner (some areas have trash) Minimal if no cell service (att) from Heidis Inn to Mahopac Bank so calls drop or your are unable to continue the conversation. Connecting driveways to keep vehicle traffic down Cute restaurants, cafes w outdoor seating, shops. Lots of potential around ski place for hotels, cafes, indoor play places cycling lanes Dedicated bike path, walkways Dedicated bike path, walkways Demographics no longer support a quaint country road. It should be widened with working turning lanes to support multiple businesses. It is not appropriate for housing. I think there should be a moratorium on new multi family housing in the town. Do something positive where the golf dome used to be. Dont over commercialize. Keep the country/town feel. Landscaping, same/consistent look and feel of businesses. Walkways, outdoor recreation, dog friendly, trails. Keep a local country feel. Keep open spaces for recreation, town park would be nice. Double lane throughout Town of Southeast Planning Board 36 September 25, 2020 Exterior and structural standards, less signage, no neon and some plantings FIOS for the whole road. No sidewalks, it takes to long to walk to get lunch and walk back. get rid of bill boards Greater variety of shopping and entertainment resources Green space by bull n barrel - sidewalks I like, very much, to see some streets scapegoat , nice lightPosts, at least 3 lanes rd, Nicky marked I think all 3 would be fantastic - Route 22 needs better aesthetics both in buildings and in landscapes. Having access to sidewalks would make street traffic along the corridor more viable and would encourage recreational activity and perhaps shopping (like Ridgefield, CT!). I think that it also needs to be easier to turn on to and off of Route 22. I think of where Ski Haus is and how the buildings across the street and next to have short driveways and little parking. This could be improved as well. I think of you are going to do a revitalization you have to make safe walking paths and crossings, whether it be a pedestrian bridge etc. plus you need ample lighting. I think of you are going to do a revitalization you have to make safe walking paths and crossings, whether it be a pedestrian bridge etc. plus you need ample lighting. I think of you are going to do a revitalization you have to make safe walking paths and crossings, whether it be a pedestrian bridge etc. plus you need ample lighting. I would like a multi sports center for families to enjoy possibly by the vacant lot across from the ACME parking lot. I would also love to see us promote our natural resources and trails, like the great swamp. We should also have a small visitor center with information about our town, historic sights and trails. This would attract individuals from other towns who could come for the day to enjoy these resources and would then have the opportunity to visit our local businesses creating greater commerce. I think it would be better for us to create a visitor friendly place rather then create more strip malls or retail which in my opinion will hurt our quality of life not help it. I’d like to see: • Pedestrian Traffic Signal Lights with push buttons added to major intersections on Route 22 • Traffic crosswalks added at major intersections along Route 22 • Traffic cameras added to major intersections along Route 22 to enforce speed limits along Route 22 which would assist with pedestrian safety and minimizing traffic accidents If it could be widened from Milltown up to the clock tower or buffer trees for noise added in that area. If there are more businesses coming we need to reduce speed and add traffic lights If there are multifamily, then sidewalks, but you need more new development to justify improvements. Its the vacant unused commercial land that needs to be put to work, not adding improvements for the sake of improvements. If you build more shopping plazas, make sure they are visually appealing as opposed to what we have now old 1970-80’s style strip mall. Clock tower is a good example but from the street you really don’t see how nice it really is. If you can straighten 22 do it Improve the Brewster Motor Lodge appearance Improve the condition of the roadway of the route 22 corridor Increase plantings and vegetation Infastructure and street scape Infrastructure Infrastructure, sewers systems, walking trails Instead of traffic lights, traffic circles to deal with the flow of traffic. Instead of traffic lights, traffic circles to deal with the flow of traffic. just keep it paved reasonably well, and cleared of snow/ice in winter Landscaping Town of Southeast Planning Board 37 September 25, 2020 Landscaping, uniform design possibly a little New England style mixed with modern... NOTthe concrete plaster and fake looking cement facing! Sidewalks a must... turning lanes Lanes for dedicated turning to keep traffic flowing. Less commercial corporate businesses more independently owned businesses better restaurants Lights Lower speed limits. Maintaining grass and landscaping along the route is important. Not building density to the exclusion of our country-like setting. Make better use of spaces that have been left unattended. If these spaces are owned by someone, the town should enforce cutting down the overgrowth of grass and weeds. Make it like Ridgefield. Make it more visually appealing and clean looking, especially in terms of so many signs that are in disrepair and a general lack of attractive landscaping; Maybe biking trail mini parks ( handful of trees, couple of benches), places where small groups of people can get together More businesses More green space and trees. More lighting More mini shopping centers/strip malls. More open land. Sidewalks would be a danger. More outdoor eating availability More parking at Town Offices More pedestrian friendly access More potential businesses that meet the needs of the community. more stores like mom & pop shops MORE STREETSCAPING VS EMPTY GAS STATIONS AND LOTS More trees More trees and greenery, road quality improved, smart urban planning mostly sidewalks mostly sidewalks Municipal Sewer and water Nice Park, 5 to 10 floors buildings,sidewalks, bike paths, organic museums, teathers, gardens, retail stores and entertainment area. Specific area for local farm vendors and Truck food at open park for the whole family. No sidewalks, turning lanes are necessary. I would like to see a community theater, Wegman's supermarket, Lowe's box store, COSTCO. No solid barrier Noise enforcement on trucks and motorcycles with illegal exhaust and bike lane connecting to trails. None None None None None. Focus your efforts on making traffic patterns flow better 7 support the businesses on that route. Nothing , keep it as it is. one entrance to multiple venues having less areas in which you would cross traffic flow Open space outdoor cafes, more of a town feel not too commercial Parks and trails, biking opportunities. Paving would be nice for a change. Sidewalks would make sense if changes are made for more housing and retail Town of Southeast Planning Board 38 September 25, 2020 Plant trees along 22; make it possible for people to walk from one parking lot to another without walking on 22. Preserve 684 to Milltown .. beautiful area would be ruined by development. New development around acme, red rooster etc should be tied together as whole vs little strip shopping ... park and explore Road beautification. Landscaping roads and highway right-of-ways (R/W) serves many purposes for people who live in, work in, and visit Putnam. 4 main reasons for enhancing these landscapes: aesthetics, safety, roadway enhancement, and environmental management. Aesthetics – Roadside beautification sites softens structures, improves appearances which invites tourism, businesses and their customers, breaks up the linearity of the R/W, provides a variety of color, texture and scale, frames a vista or significant off-road feature, blends with the adjacent plantings, and screens undesirable off- road elements. Safety - Roadside beautification sites can increase driver alertness, provide windbreaks and reduce headlight glare. Roadway Enhancement - Well placed roadside beautification sites can reduce the amount of land that requires mowing. Environmental Management - Roadside beautification sites can vegetate steep slopes and remote areas, along with re-vegetating construction areas. Roadways that intersect Route 22 at a few junctions from which businesses can be situated so that there aren't so many roadcuts and traffic will flow. Bike lanes Roundabout Roundabouts Roundabouts instead of traffic lights would reduce speeding, freeing cops up for actual criminal investigations Safe roadways & pleasant view/streetscapes Safe turn lanes. Sidewalks. safe, separate bicycle lanes see above Sewer Sewer. Buried utility lines Sewer. Buried utility lines Sewerage processing side walks Side walks Side walks , cross walks Side walks and a large dog park with separate pens for small & large dogs. Benches for sitting & tree shade. side walks definitely, maybe a bike/walking/running lane, protected from main road Side walks, attractive lightposts with flowers side walks, small shops, like a square to walk around for ice cream, etc. Sidewalk and street lights Sidewalk, appealing building design and landscape Sidewalk, crosswalks Sidewalks Sidewalks sidewalks Sidewalks Sidewalks Sidewalks Sidewalks Sidewalks Sidewalks Sidewalks Town of Southeast Planning Board 39 September 25, 2020 Sidewalks Sidewalks Sidewalks & streetlights Sidewalks & streetlights Sidewalks , running , walking and bike riding friendly Sidewalks and a variety of shopping and restaurants Sidewalks and an increase small businesses Sidewalks and communal space!!! How about a park??? With food trucks so families can enjoy the outdoors safely and get a bite to eat at the same time? Food trucks=happy people! Sidewalks and communal space!!! How about a park??? With food trucks so families can enjoy the outdoors safely and get a bite to eat at the same time? Food trucks=happy people! Sidewalks and crosswalks would be amazing. Maybe some police officers patrolling this dangerous road? Paving it? Again, turn lane from 312 onto 22 South? Sidewalks and crosswalks would improve and quality of life and safety. Teens would love to be able to walk around. Sidewalks and landscaping it better, not just like a drive through strip mall. sidewalks and lighting and greenspace and a gazebo (see main street in southbury CT) Sidewalks and streetscape Sidewalks from Clocktower/ACME up to Doansburg. There is a lot more foot traffic in these areas and sidewalks would be safer. Also, STOP allowing so many gas stations! Also, it would be nice if there were some signage regulations in Southeast—keeps things storefronts from looking junkie). sidewalks from Milltown rd to Doansberg improvement to the bike trail access at rt202 and 684/22 overpass Sidewalks from Milltown to 312 or mount ebo Sidewalks in commercial areas Sidewalks on both sides of road. Grassy median between north/south bound lanes. Sidewalks on both sides of road. Grassy median between north/south bound lanes. sidewalks or a park Sidewalks or small business developments, almost like cul-de-sacs off Route 22, which have good access and parking. Sidewalks- please make it possible for people to walk safely! Sidewalks Street Lighting Sidewalks to make it safe for people to get from place to place. Sidewalks with street lighting connecting all the businesses. Also a designated bike lane. Sidewalks would be a good addition. Sidewalks would be a great improvement so people could just park and walk around instead of having to drive around. Sidewalks would be a nice addition. Sidewalks would be a nice addition. Sidewalks would be a nice addition. Sidewalks would be a nice addition. Sidewalks would be a nice addition. Sidewalks would be a nice addition. Sidewalks would be a nice addition. Sidewalks would be a nice addition. Sidewalks would be an improvement. Sidewalks would be great - I think they always enhance a town. I often see people walking on the side of the road. Very Dangerous. Streetscape very important - it gives life. Would be nice during the Holidays if there were some Holiday decorations on the light posts. Clocktower Commons could be hopping with additional retail and restaurants and make use of the courtyard. Town of Southeast Planning Board 40 September 25, 2020 Sidewalks would be GREAT. Continuing/enhancing landscaping in front of businesses. SIDEWALKS WOULD BE GREAT. LOTS OF PEOPLE WALKING BUSY SHOULDERS Sidewalks would be great. I would also like to see a bus stops. May be a green common area like a park in the center of it. Metered parking. U-turn lanes on 22. A sewer system. And maybe moving the electrical utilities underground at the same time. Sidewalks would be nice Sidewalks would be nice Sidewalks would be nice, I see many people walking on 22 and it is unsafe. Landscaping would be nice too. Sidewalks, and outside greenscape so people can come to the town to visit and stay a spell m Sidewalks, bike lanes, landscaping, maintenance of abandoned and empty areas/businesses, better public transportation. Businesses that focus on local residents and commuters. How about a park or a pedestrian shopping mall in the abandoned space across from the shopping center? Sidewalks, bike lanes, streetscaping, green spaces, leisure areas, community gathering space, indoor and outdoor dining and shopping. Human- and small-community scale development that is also an attractive stopping point for travelers heading north and south through Southeast. Sidewalks, bikelanes Sidewalks, crosswalks street lamps Sidewalks, gardens, parks, playgrounds, rec center Sidewalks, landscaping, fixing the horrible road, retail business strips with shopping sidewalks, more businesses for retail and entertainment, Sidewalks, parks, benches, A place a family can stop and walk around without being directly o n 22. Sidewalks, safe walking spaces for families/pets. Completion/extension of the bike path. Visually appealing buildings Sidewalks, safe walking spaces for families/pets. Completion/extension of the bike path. Visually appealing buildings Sidewalks, shopping, things for teenagers / college kids/ young adults to do Sidewalks, street lights Sidewalks, street lights, crossing bridges in some areas Sidewalks, streetscape sidewalks, streetscape Sidewalks, streetscape Sidewalks, streetscape Sidewalks, streetscapes and more business. Sidewalks, trees. Sidewalks, turning lanes, landscaping and a New England feel to structure. Sidewalks, turning lanes, landscaping and lighting Sidewalks, walking paths, a dog park, maybe a square where artists could paint, and people could have craft stands and farmers markets in a pretty setting with benches. Sidewalks, yes!! Make it walkable. Bike lanes (!!) would be great, connecting it to the rail trail! Sidewalks. Sidewalks. Broader lanes for traffic. Bypass if possible. Ex. Business 22 and throughway22 like heavily used routes in Florida. Sidewalks/crosswalks/lighting Some beautiful green space. Maybe a park Stores that we shop in so I could keep our tax dollars her not given to Connecticut Street scape , turning arrows on lights Streets cape, green spaces, gardens, dog/people park, walking trails, sidewalks, outdoor ice skating rink, better and unique restaurants Streetscape Town of Southeast Planning Board 41 September 25, 2020 Streetscape Streetscape & Sidewalks Streetscape (trees & flowers). streetscape and sidewalks Streetscape and sidewalks Streetscape and sidewalks Streetscape would make it look a lot better like at Red Rooster Streetscape, sidewalks, covered bus stops, infrastructure streetscape/sidewalks Strip malls that if the weather is bad, people can go from one store to the other, without getting rained or snowed on. The new paved sections of Rte 22 are terrific ! The new paved sections of Rte 22 are terrific ! There should be sections of unimproved land to break up buildings and parking lots. Continuous development along the entire road would be very unattractive. town sewer and water utlizing dep water traffic light at 164 Traffic lights; too many cars speed Trees, charming landscape sidewalk, a feature that identifies our town. Like a fountain or statue etc but so Ethi g to center the location and build unity Visual street scapes Walkable to and from attractions Walkable to and from attractions walk-able town center would be great. this way people can park and walk to shops/restaurants. could make it look very charming and welcoming. walking or biking space, quaint hudson valley feel Walking/Running and separate bike lanes Walkways, crosswalks, bus stops Whatever is done should be environmentally sound When making a left turn out of some businesses, it’s nearly impossible and causes backups in the business parking lots (Mobile, Red Rooster, Dunkin) While not practical a bike walking path would be ideal or perhaps a sidewalk Widen road to 4 lanes Widen the road Widen the street- or maybe set the shopping plaza way in from the road like in Somers of rt 100 or at like the readers digest place. Widening of road widening, sidewalks and more traffic lights Wider Wider, more traffic lights where 684 ends, lower the speed limit, lane access for residential owners Would be nice if the corridor could have some nice landscaping. Some towns look beautiful because they are well maintained. Would like to see sidewalks. Town of Southeast Planning Board 42 September 25, 2020 Question 4: Are there any others thoughts or ideas that you would like to share regarding the Route 22 corridor? Very noisy lately especially at night. Loud cars and motorcycles . I live between Lakeview shopping center and Elks club. 2 LANES UP FROM 684 TO MILLTOWN LIKELY NEVER HAPPEN 22 is a "country road" the development proposed is too much for a 2-lane road. BUT do not widen 22. 35 mph with flashing actual speed sign beginning at Mananitas 55 to 35 speed limit is a bad idea. Transition by reducing to 45 at end of 684 then 35 at M illtown rd 55 to 35 speed limit is a bad idea. Transition by reducing to 45 at end of 684 then 35 at Milltown rd A hesitation toward big business as a cure-all. Covid-19 reiterates the importance of 'local.' Would love to see our community truly thrive. Add a Center Meridian that gives us Safety and Beauty. Add businesses to assist with the tax burden add lanes reduce time people spend in the town Allow new businesses in An open air shopping area with small boutique shops. Like a bizarre Any development that would bring more people into the area has to include traffic mitigation. A center turn lane added would be a major improvement. Any updates must be balanced with the suburban/rural attraction of our town/area. I wouldn't want too much or unattractive manufacturing/industrial brought in. Anything new should follow a beautification rule. How awesome clock tower could have been. But nope, just professional offices, one restaurant and a hair salon. Build on ry 6 going to Danbury or between drewville and Cameron’s. Less traffic there. As it is currently, I see it getting increasingly dangerous to drive. people treat it as a pass through, often speeding and passing through red lights. It shows zero charm or history. businesses are quite disconnected. could be really quite different and offer many more in town options for both locals and guests. As outlined in previous studies, a Jersey barrier from Sodom to Milltown with turnarounds at Sodom & Milltown. As you approach Milltown Rd. going north on 22 there is a merging lane on the right that ends abruptly right before the Shell station. It is so dangerous when drivers think they can pass traffic only to find it comes to an end quickly and they must vear into traffic suddenly. More signage is needed to notify it is not a through lane! Avoid using/impacting side road as a means for mitigating added traffic due to development. WHY DO WE NEED TO DEVELOP??? Leave as is. Because it's a connecting travel route to 684, The challeng of creating a smooth flow with a safe community based shopping area is immense at best. Catering facilities with views of the reservoir should be encouraged, along with complementary hotel use. Clean it up. It’s a dump. Clean up the wooded area Especially across from Lakeview shopping center. Also the old gas station on corner of 22 & 312 is such an eyesore Bring in a Shop Rite, We don’t need 2 Acme’s within approximately 5 miles of each other Convert our area in a nice mix for family and business. Do create any more curb cuts for new driveways. Keep any changes to existing developed footprints and make more direct connections between lots so that traffic doesn't need to enter roadway to go from retail to gas station Town of Southeast Planning Board 43 September 25, 2020 Do not make route22 into another congested over crowded Central Avenue like in Westchester county ! Keep Route 22 as is the only thing needed is to add an additional traffic lane in the middle to help traffic flow . Do not put any more gas stations on the rt 22 corridor - there are too many. DO NOT PUT IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING! Do something with corner of 22 & 312 such an eyesore Since we have 2 Acme’s ShopRite would be nice in one of the locations Still waiting for a Costco in this part of Putnam County encourage linking rear of properties to collect some traffic pressure Encourage/maintain the small town charm in the way that Route 7 in CT has by avoiding big box stores. Encourage new businesses like outdoor eateries, restaurants and recreation. Expand the role of the Putnam Economic Board to encourage technology. First impressions! When you leave 684 and get on to rte 22 it feels scenic, like you’re about to enter in to a lovely majestic town. Then you hit the stop light and proceed towards clock tower and your greeted with a rundown ugly feeling and just want to keep on going. Focus on empty buildings and stop worrying about padding builders pockets. Fix old spot where Dills Best was. Fix old flower shop. Leave the rest along. Spend the money in Brewster Village if you want to spend. gas stations in between Doansburg and Patterson. south has enough Get rid of a couple of stoplights and make them traffic circles which would increase the flow of traffic Get something done! I have been living in Southeast for 20 years and have been reading about plans and attending community meetings-it is way past time to move forward. Have a nice mix of businesses and open spaces. A central focus for people to go and shop local, eat at a local restaurant, socialize with friends. No need for big box stores or over commercialization with chain stores/restaurants. Include recreation area like a town park with open space/lawn, walking trails which could include an area for town events/festivals, etc. I don't think that we should necessarily be doing more building, rather we should be filling the vacant places that have already been built. We are also sorely lacking an outdoor recreational/play ground area of any quality. There is nothing in the area to attract business. What about an outdoor drive i n movie theater across from the Burger King on 22? I hate going there. I hope that we can continue to support local small businesses by giving them the chance to rent affordable shops along Route 22, as well as creating affordable housing for residents in their late 20's/early 30's who would prefer to live in Putnam County as opposed to the high rent and crowding of New York City. It would also be nice to have more entertainment options, and sidewalks to make the area feel like one cohesive neighborhood that is navigable for pedestrians -- residents of above shop apartments as well as the employees who work along the corridor. Covered bus stops/benches would also be nice for those employees working and walking along the corridor. Stop lights are needed around the busiest section - Red Rooster/Gas Stations/Sinapis and Dunkin Donuts shopping plaza both for cars getting in and out of these parking lots and pedestrians who frequently cross the road at these points. Also, the Bel Air Motor Lodge is an eye sore, and there are rumors about it being unsafe to visit -- not a good look for tourists passing through town. I hope we see the changes we need! I see no way there won't be massive traffic jams and pollution of our Reservoirs and wetlands. I think that Route 22 needs an overhaul in order to attract both bigger businesses (like Target and Starbucks) and smaller-locally owned business. Having both would be a great asset to our community. I think that utilizing some of the more open space along the corridor for outdoor recreational activities would be fantastic too. I imagine the space where the Golf Dome used to be being a great outdoor park, sports facility. This would help balance development and encourage residents to utilize their "own backyard" - look at how awesome and how used the bike trail is! Growing up in Southeast, I have always felt that there was a disconnect in our community and I truly believe that it's because we Town of Southeast Planning Board 44 September 25, 2020 don't have a "downtown" area. Revitalizing both Route 22 and the village of Brewster would help build our community. I love that communities like Ridgefield and Mt Kisco can provide their residents with all that I mentioned above, without it feeling overwhelming like it may in Brookfield/Danbury. I encourage the developers to look at these towns and communities while coming up with a plan for ours. I would be unhappy if the areas you mention were changed to a bigger highway since I live off of Doansburg road and travel this area all the time. I’d like to eliminate the motel on 22 if you are going to look to revitalize the road as it’s a major eyesore and not to mention the people that are housed there present a potential danger to children I’d like to eliminate the motel on 22 if you are going to look to revitalize the road as it’s a major eyesore and not to mention the people that are housed there present a potential danger to children I’d like to eliminate the motel on 22 if you are going to look to revitalize the road as it’s a major eyesore and not to mention the people that are housed there present a potential danger to children If more businesses are added it will have to be widened If new lanes, sidewalks, median added, encourage business owners to landscape properties nicely. If new lanes, sidewalks, median added, encourage business owners to landscape properties nicely. If you don’t do something quick you’re not gonna have any stores. you have empty gas station lot on the corner nothing ever happened the indoor tennis used to be nothing ever happened with that piece of land for a long time and now where the nursery/Florist was and the drilling land next to it nothing is done there. You better start doing it or someone else will somewhere else and we’re going there. Impossible to make turns out of businesses In the 30 years I’ve been in Brewster I’ve seen five people run over in front of my business crossing from the Bel Air motel to the Dunkin’ Donuts palmer hardware plaza. The people who permanently reside in that motel regularly cross the road to go to the gas stations in the plaza putting themselves and their children in jeopardy. A traffic light system and crosswalk system would be beneficial for everybody Instead of just wasting money taking surveys , DO SOMETHING! Is it really necessary to develop every bit of open land? What happened to the master plan that called for retaining the open spaces and agricultural lands that are part of our heritage? Do we really want to create a "miracle mile" along Route 22? It needs improving ASAP. I've lived here over 20 years and nothing has changed. It should be faster, well paved. It should not be a land of barren strip malls filled with fast-food chains. We can go to Danbury Mall for that. It would be good to have a sense of cohesiveness and community in that area, but that's not easy since it's not a downtown. It's a convenient shopping/service center and accomplishes that, especially with the small businesses. They make it friendly, welcoming and provide the sense of community there. It would be nice to have more family oriented activities It would be so nice to have a place in Brewster that is pleasant to look at and not so run down. Nice dining and shopping areas. Similar to Pleasantville and Mt. Kisco. Keep development to a minimum. Where new businesses/features are added, choose ones that benefit the community in new/different ways (community service / agriculture / arts / education). Keep it green - any plans HAVE to make environmental impact a top priority. Keep minimal traffic. If it is developed too much it will no longer become and safe neighborhood which will increase homeless population too. Lanes for left hand turns Leave it alone. Retail should be discouraged until the County legislature changes it's policy of keeping all sales tax to itself. Southeast bears the brunt of retail 'development' and does not get the benefits. This has to stop. Leave well enough alone. Widening this corridor will only increase the traffic volume and pollution. less areas to cross the traffic flow Town of Southeast Planning Board 45 September 25, 2020 Less urban sprawl & more country atmosphere Living on Route 22 between Clocktower Commons and 684, the traffic is surprisingly heavy. Lots of small businesses is better than singular large businesses. Also, ideas that permit use of the land by residents is better than businesses buying up huge swaths of land and making it private property. A large public pool with maintained parkland for Putnam residents only is still my favorite outcome with on site mom and pop concessions stands. Bike trails are always nice as are hiking trails. Zip line courses would be fun. Family destinations. Our school district clearly shows large quantities of children. Give them some place wholesome to enjoy with family. Mixed use at the old golf dome. More buses More coffee houses, restaurants and entertainment venues. Public pool would be nice. N/a New restaurant options outside of pizza and Italian. We have more than enough of those. Bring in new fast food: chipotle, chick-fil-a, Jersey mikes, cold stone, some taverns for people to go to and enjoy themselves locally. Bring in a brewery. Something to make this town updated and a place where people enjoy being. No no no No No No No affordable housing. No more condos/townhouses No giant parking lots. Nothing ugly visible from street. Nothing. No big signs. No more has stations or motels No thank you. Not at this time. Open up the zoning for many more uses and streamline the approval process so people will see progress quickly. That will encourage other investors and developers to come here to invest and build. Our population has exploded in the last few years and the last thing we need is more housing especially large multi-family buildings or condos. I moved to Brewster over 20 years ago and fell in love with the open space, quietness of the town, and it's residents. While I understand progress is necessary and times change we cannot allow or afford for it to get out of hand. If I wanted to live in a place like Long Island I would have moved there a long time ago. Outdoor recreation and parks Outdoor recreation and parks Parks, healthy food, cultural organizations. Pave whole corridor Please allow family friendly things as well as restaurants and retail. Please avoid.changing the character of the route too much to keep the character in place. Please continue to keep the business signs along the road small Please do not make more stores/hotels/commerce without improving traffic flow. Congestion of cars and trucks is already heavy and noisy. Please don’t ruin the “country” feel by over developing. Please fix Town of Southeast Planning Board 46 September 25, 2020 Please make a 4 lane road system. It will help the people of Southeast tremendously and its been a long time coming. Please monitor speeding and please take inform your residents of the answer Please monitor speeding and please take inform your residents of the answer Post and limit speed. I see cars and trucks going 60, 70 mph every day! Post more speed limit signage...it's confusing as to where the 35 mph actually starts when traveling south and aggravating with only one sign traveling north indicating 55mph. Of course, the latter speed would likely change with increased business in the area. Regarding the new bridge that just opened from Route 22 leading into the village.....is it strictly a pedestrian walkway??? Regulate/police the 35 mph stretch—otherwise, why was it changed from 45 Mph if there was no intention of monitoring it. Stop the trucks from using those loud “airbrakes” through the residential section. Reopen all of the closed businesses, or put something in their place. They are an eyesore. Restrict construction traffic Restrict construction traffic Retail is under great stress. Retail pays a lot of school taxes but does not need much town services. Retail needs people. People need housing. To help retail and the vibrancy of the area, encourage housing - multifamily and town house developments. Figure out how to create waste water treatment to permit the housing. Revitalize the village Safety and speed rates are very important. See above Sewer system for all Smaller shops, family oriented activities, dining and shops to help keep small town charm. Something for kids to do Speeders and truckers going north have been taking allview ave as a short cut to rt. 84. Ple ase stop them Sports center Thank you for paving it, finally. Thank you. Thanks for doing this. The access to 684 south is unsafe and causes tremendous traffic jams in the morning. The access from 684 north to 22 north has been a traffic jam for the last 40 years. Fix it. The land where the golf dome used to be - could be a multi use sports field, a drive in - sports complex or Rec Center for the town. A town Pool/Park would be great for this town. A place to offer live concerts/music would be lovely. We lost Brewster Sports Center - this would be a great location for a sports complex and would provide additional income to the stores on 22. We need something that will bring people to Brewster. While giving the town The roads should always be properly maintained The space across from Acme plaza could be an excellent location recreational area for families With colorful play ground. Beehive style stores, a plaza for outdoor concerts, outdoor art exhibition, movie theater, a lot of benches under trees. Give us a ‘center’ for the youths to go to at evening, old fashion way.Where they can make all the noice they want without disturbing anyone. About the wetlands. Is it possible to go canoeing there? Don’t make the site into a big city with tall build ings. We like our country side. The traffic is the biggest problem. the village and many surrounding areas already have too many multi-family houses we do not need anymore in this area There are already vacancies, try to reconfigure existing structures, very unattractive for the most part, Red Rooster has appeal for nostalgia & is unique but nothing on rt 22 would draw anyone to the area, Town of Southeast Planning Board 47 September 25, 2020 basically it is a pass through to commute to 684/84. Town residents mostly shop in Danbury & Federal Rd, maybe try to attract a Wegmans to compete in that arena. Can anything be done to create a town center in Brewster? Beacon has grown into a destination, NYS doesn't need anymore strip malls that era has passed. I don't think sidewalks would help why would anyone want to walk along heavy traffic heading to and from 684 on rt 22, listening to noise & pollution & to what destination, & from what starting point, the train station? rt 6? something scenic yet to be developed? would it connect with the rail trail? There are many unoccupied retail stores along Route 22, many of which have been vacant for years. These stores are unlikely to be operating again in the foreseeable future. Therefore, additional retail development should be strongly discouraged. There are plenty of areas where businesses we shop at can come in to try to keep tax revenue here There has been a notable lack of attention to the route 22 corridor over the 20+ years I have lived in the area, which is amazing as it is a major north/south route. It appears that there has been no discernible plan for the area, as it is a disjointed mixture of individual developments that lack cohesion. Some areas along the corridor are abandoned and overgrown, others lack care and maintenance. The needs of local residents and commuters should be the primary considerations in the development and maintenance of the area. There is a LOT of truck traffic during business hours. Makes it very noisy. there shouldnt be any mega stores and keep the rural character of the area There were grand plans decades ago to improve RT 22; NYS and NYC were the roadblock. They were mentioned above Think of who is here. And why they are here. Not who might come and spend money from other cities. This is a long time coming, thank you for asking my opinion. This survey is a great way to get input from residents. To maintain rural character as much as possible too much talk in 20 years and nothing has been done, please stop asking and do something! Totally opposed to building on wet lands!!! Route 22 looks a lot better since it has been resurfaced. town operated swimming pool (opposite Acme @ the old sports center site) also the fishing hole at the park at Mt ebo and doansberg has become inaccessible due to over growth. Trader Joe's; Whole Foods; YWCA; NYSC; YOGA studio Traffic coming from 684 is way too fast!!! The residential roads cannot take the overflow, the speed on the side roads is unacceptable Urbanisation has been accelerating in Putnam County as people move from the city to our rural towns. Stop urban development that sprawls into our countryside. No major retail or housing development. Strict Zoning to limit building height and ensure architectural characteristics to reflect town's rural character. Areas of transition from rural to urban and land uses at the urban/rural edge in the peri-urban landscape require the lens of spatial arrangement from both urban and rural perspectives to shape, manage, and preserve the ecosystems that people depend upon. We don't need to see another storage facility or an auto parts store or a nail place around here. I think that we would do well to have some contemporary restaurants, even a vegan place or a Ramen place. I know that it would seem like there is no market for those sorts of trendy places, but there is--we all go to Danbury or New Milford or Mahopac or Somers. Another thought I had is to have upscale antiques and arts--even an arts center--something that would give character and notoriety to the area. New York City take Rte 22 north and pass through here all the time--they and Westchester residents would be good consumers for this sort of thing. Given the way things are right now, this is a great time to think about who we want to be. I thank you for the opportunity to weigh in. We need big stores like Target ShopRite So we don’t have to go into other communities to do our shopping We need big stores like Target ShopRite So we don’t have to go into other communities to do our shopping Town of Southeast Planning Board 48 September 25, 2020 We need new business for tax bade base improvement. Please support. We should learn from traffic flow issues experienced through the years with the expansion of Route 6 in Carmel/Mahopac and not repeat the same mistakes. We won’t get businesses to come to Route 22 without water and sewer We won’t get businesses to come to Route 22 without water and sewer With an extension of 684 more and more large trucks will speed through the area as they do now on route 312. It is frightening to see how big and fast these trucks are. 312 is so laden with commercial vehicles due to the companies at the 84 intersection they shouldn’t be allowed on that small road and should be forced to stay on the highways. Would love a Costco, Wegman’s. I am tired of going to Ct. for good restaurants and stores. Absolutely love Ace Endico and Dicceos, though. Would love to live in a community that offers all the things stated as well as other ideas. Please bring this to light so we reap the rewards rather than go elsewhere for our shopping, dining and entertainment. Yes we should copy Rt 9 traffic lanes - with proper sequenced traffic lights Attachment BTapestry Segmentation Profiles TAPESTRYSEGMENTATION TM esri.com/tapestry Households: 2,718,100 Average Household Size: 2.88 Median Age: 42.6 Median Household Income: $92,900 LifeMode Group: Upscale Avenues Pleasantville WHO ARE WE? Prosperous domesticity best describes the settled denizens of Pleasantville. Situated principally in older housing in suburban areas in the Northeast (especially in New York and New Jersey) and secondarily in the West (especially in California), these slightly older couples move less than any other market. Many couples have already transitioned to empty nesters; many are still home to adult children. Families own older, single-family homes and maintain their standard of living with dual incomes. These consumers have higher incomes and home values and much higher net worth (Index 364). Older homes require upkeep; home improvement and remodeling projects are a priority—preferably done by contractors. Residents spend their spare time participating in a variety of sports or watching movies. They shop online and in a variety of stores, from upscale to discount, and use the Internet largely for financial purposes. OUR NEIGHBORHOOD • Suburban periphery of large metropolitan areas, primarily in Middle Atlantic or Pacific states. • Most homes owned (and mortgaged) (Index 146). • Households composed of older married-couple families, more without children under 18, but many with children over 18 years (Index 141). • Older, single-family homes: two-thirds built before 1970, close to half from 1950 to 1969. • One of the lowest percentages of vacant housing units at 4.5% (Index 39). • Suburban households with 3 or more vehicles and a longer travel time to work (Index 132). SOCIOECONOMIC TRAITS • Education: 66% college educated, 37% with a bachelor’s degree or higher. • Low unemployment at 4.6%; higher labor force participation rate at 67% (Index 107); higher proportion of HHs with 2 or more workers (Index 118). • Many professionals in finance, information/ technology, education, or management. • Median household income denotes affluence, with income primarily from salaries, but also from investments (Index 130) or Social Security (Index 106) and retirement income (Index 122). • Not cost-conscious, these consumers willing to spend more for quality and brands they like. • Prefer fashion that is classic and timeless as opposed to trendy. • Use all types of media equally (newspapers, magazines, radio, Internet, TV). Note: The Index represents the ratio of the segment rate to the US rate multiplied by 100. Consumer preferences are estimated from data by GfK MRI. 2B TAPESTRYSEGMENTATION TM esri.com/tapestry LifeMode Group: Upscale Avenues Pleasantville2B 85+ 80–84 75–79 70–74 65–69 60–64 55–59 50–54 45–49 40–44 35–39 30–34 25–29 20–24 15–19 10–14 5–9 <5 8% 4% 0 4% 8% Male Female Median Household Income Median Net Worth $56,100 $93,300 $92,900 $339,300 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 Esri Median HH Income Esri Median Net Worth Series2 Series1 $56,100 $93,300 $92,900 $339,300 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 Esri Median HH Income Esri Median Net Worth Series2 Series1 Housing Food Apparel & Services Transportation Health Care Entertainment &Recreation Education Pensions &Social Security Other 0.0%0.5%1.0%1.5%2.0%2.5%3.0%3.5%4.0%4.5% Male Age 0-4 Male Age 5-9 Male Age 10-14 Male Age 15-19 Male Age 20-24 Male Age 25-29 Male Age 30-34 Male Age 35-39 Male Age 40-44 Male Age 45-49 Male Age 50-54 Male Age 55-59 Male Age 60-64 Male Age 65-69 Male Age 70-74 Male Age 75-79 Male Age 80-84 Male Age 85+ Age by Sex -Male Series2 Series1 0.0%0.5%1.0%1.5%2.0%2.5%3.0%3.5%4.0%4.5% Female Age 0-4 Female Age 5-9 Female Age 10-14 Female Age 15-19 Female Age 20-24 Female Age 25-29 Female Age 30-34 Female Age 35-39 Female Age 40-44 Female Age 45-49 Female Age 50-54 Female Age 55-59 Female Age 60-64 Female Age 65-69 Female Age 70-74 Female Age 75-79 Female Age 80-84 Female Age 85+ Chart Title Series2 Series1 INCOME AND NET WORTH Net worth measures total household assets (homes, vehicles, investments, etc.) less any debts, secured (e.g., mortgages) or unsecured (credit cards). Household income and net worth are estimated by Esri. OCCUPATION BY EARNINGS The fi ve occupations with the highest number of workers in the market are displayed by median earnings. Data from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD BUDGET INDEX The index compares the average amount spent in this market’s household budgets for housing, food, apparel, etc., to the average amount spent by all US households. An index of 100 is average. An index of 120 shows that average spending by consumers in this market is 20 percent above the national average. Consumer expenditures are estimated by Esri. AGE BY SEX (Esri data) Median Age: 42.6 US: 38.2 Indicates US RACE AND ETHNICITY (Esri data) The Diversity Index summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity). Diversity Index: 61.0 US: 64.0 Hispanic* Multiple Other Asian andPac. Islander AmericanIndian Black White $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 0 100,000 20 300,000 60 500,000 0 700,000 *Hispanic Can Be of Any Race. 0 20% 40% 60% 80% 0 $100K $200K $300K $400K $500K $600K+ 0 $100K $200K $300K $400K $500K $600K+ US Average.US Median.Median EarningsWorkers (Age 16+)0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 136 123 132 124 130 132 171 143 135 Own 83.1%Rent 16.9% Chart Title Own Rent Home Ownership US Percentage: 62.7% Own 37.3% Rent Population Population Growth (Annual %) Population Density (Persons per sq. mile) 350 350 350 0 0 0 900,000 -0.5% 0 11,000,000 3.0% 25,000 7,927,600 0.5% 1416 1000 Wealth Index Socioeconomic Status Index Housing Affordability Index 153 138 110 TAPESTRYSEGMENTATION TM esri.com/tapestry MARKET PROFILE (Consumer preferences are estimated from data by GfK MRI) • Prefer imported SUVs, serviced by a gas station or car dealer. • Invest in conservative securities and contribute to charities. • Work on home improvement and remodeling projects, but also hire contractors. • Have bundled services (TV/Internet/phone). • Access the Internet via fiber optics or cable modem, on a newer computer, to pay bills, make purchases, and track investments. • Subscribe to premium channels (HBO, Showtime, or Starz) and use video-on-demand to watch TV shows and movies. • Enjoy outdoor gardening, going to the beach, visiting theme parks, frequenting museums, and attending rock concerts. ESRI INDEXES Esri developed three indexes to display average household wealth, socioeconomic status, and housing affordability for the market relative to US standards. POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Total population, average annual population change since Census 2010, and average density (population per square mile) are displayed for the market relative to the size and change among all Tapestry markets. Data estimated by Esri. LifeMode Group: Upscale Avenues Pleasantville2B HOUSING Median home value is displayed for markets that are primarily owner occupied; average rent is shown for renter-occupied markets. Tenure and home value are estimated by Esri. Housing type and average rent are from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. Typical Housing: Single Family Median Value: $382,000 US Median: $207,300 High Low TAPESTRYSEGMENTATION TM esri.com/tapestry SEGMENT DENSITY This map illustrates the density and distribution of the Pleasantville Tapestry Segment by households. LifeMode Group: Upscale Avenues Pleasantville2B For more information 1-800-447-9778 info@esri.com esri.com Copyright © 2020 Esri. All rights reserved. Esri, the Esri globe logo, Tapestry, @esri.com, and esri.com are trademarks, service marks, or registered marks of Esri in the United States, the European Community, or certain other jurisdictions. Other companies and products or services mentioned herein may be trademarks, service marks, or registered marks of their respective mark owners. G826513 ESRI2C1/20ms TAPESTRYSEGMENTATION TM esri.com/tapestry Households: 3,664,200 Average Household Size: 2.85 Median Age: 45.1 Median Household Income: $108,700 LifeMode Group: Af f luent Estates Savvy Suburbanites WHO ARE WE? Savvy Suburbanites residents are well educated, well read, and well capitalized. Families include empty nesters and empty nester wannabes, who still have adult children at home. Located in older neighborhoods outside the urban core, their suburban lifestyle includes home remodeling and gardening plus the active pursuit of sports and exercise. They enjoy good food and wine, plus the amenities of the city’s cultural events. OUR NEIGHBORHOOD • Established neighborhoods (most built between 1970 and 1990) found in the suburban periphery of large metropolitan markets. • Married couples with no children or older children; average household size is 2.85. • 91% owner occupied; 66% mortgaged (Index 160). • Primarily single-family homes, with a median value of $362,900 (Index 161). • Low vacancy rate at 3.8%. SOCIOECONOMIC TRAITS • Education: 50.6% college graduates; 77.6% with some college education. • Low unemployment at 3.5% (Index 65); higher labor force participation rate at 67.9% (Index 109) with proportionately more 2-worker households at 62.2%, (Index 120). • Well-connected consumers that appreciate technology and make liberal use of it for everything from shopping and banking to staying current and communicating. • Informed shoppers that do their research prior to purchasing and focus on quality. Note: The Index represents the ratio of the segment rate to the US rate multiplied by 100. Consumer preferences are estimated from data by GfK MRI. 1D TAPESTRYSEGMENTATION TM esri.com/tapestry LifeMode Group: Af f luent Estates Savvy Suburbanites1D 85+ 80–84 75–79 70–74 65–69 60–64 55–59 50–54 45–49 40–44 35–39 30–34 25–29 20–24 15–19 10–14 5–9 <5 8% 4% 0 4% 8% Male Female Median Household Income Median Net Worth $56,100 $93,300 $108,700 $518,100 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 Esri Median HH Income Esri Median Net Worth Series2 Series1 $56,100 $93,300 $108,700 $518,100 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 Esri Median HH Income Esri Median Net Worth Series2 Series1 Housing Food Apparel & Services Transportation Health Care Entertainment &Recreation Education Pensions &Social Security Other 0.0%0.5%1.0%1.5%2.0%2.5%3.0%3.5%4.0%4.5%5.0% Male Age 0-4 Male Age 5-9 Male Age 10-14 Male Age 15-19 Male Age 20-24 Male Age 25-29 Male Age 30-34 Male Age 35-39 Male Age 40-44 Male Age 45-49 Male Age 50-54 Male Age 55-59 Male Age 60-64 Male Age 65-69 Male Age 70-74 Male Age 75-79 Male Age 80-84 Male Age 85+ Age by Sex -Male Series2 Series1 0.0%0.5%1.0%1.5%2.0%2.5%3.0%3.5%4.0%4.5%5.0% Female Age 0-4 Female Age 5-9 Female Age 10-14 Female Age 15-19 Female Age 20-24 Female Age 25-29 Female Age 30-34 Female Age 35-39 Female Age 40-44 Female Age 45-49 Female Age 50-54 Female Age 55-59 Female Age 60-64 Female Age 65-69 Female Age 70-74 Female Age 75-79 Female Age 80-84 Female Age 85+ Chart Title Series2 Series1 INCOME AND NET WORTH Net worth measures total household assets (homes, vehicles, investments, etc.) less any debts, secured (e.g., mortgages) or unsecured (credit cards). Household income and net worth are estimated by Esri. OCCUPATION BY EARNINGS The fi ve occupations with the highest number of workers in the market are displayed by median earnings. Data from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD BUDGET INDEX The index compares the average amount spent in this market’s household budgets for housing, food, apparel, etc., to the average amount spent by all US households. An index of 100 is average. An index of 120 shows that average spending by consumers in this market is 20 percent above the national average. Consumer expenditures are estimated by Esri. AGE BY SEX (Esri data) Median Age: 45.1 US: 38.2 Indicates US RACE AND ETHNICITY (Esri data) The Diversity Index summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity). Diversity Index: 36.2 US: 64.0 Hispanic* Multiple Other Asian andPac. Islander AmericanIndian Black White $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 0 100,000 200,000 400,000 400,000 700,000 600,0 1,000,000 *Hispanic Can Be of Any Race. 0 20% 40% 60% 80% 0 $100K $200K $300K $400K $500K $600K+ 0 $100K $200K $300K $400K $500K $600K+ US Average.US Median.Median EarningsWorkers (Age 16+)0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 159 152 162 152 161 163 194 176 168 Own 90.6%Rent 9.4% Chart Title Own Rent Home Ownership US Percentage: 62.7% Own 37.3% Rent Population Population Growth (Annual %) Population Density (Persons per sq. mile) 350 350 350 0 0 0 900,000 -0.5% 0 11,000,000 3.0% 25,000 10,509,300 0.8% 346 1000 Wealth Index Socioeconomic Status Index Housing Affordability Index 200 168 138 TAPESTRYSEGMENTATION TM esri.com/tapestry MARKET PROFILE (Consumer preferences are estimated from data by GfK MRI) • Residents prefer late model, family-oriented vehicles: SUVs, minivans, and station wagons. • Gardening and home remodeling are priorities, usually DIY. Riding mowers and power tools are popular, although they also hire contractors for the heavy lifting. • There is extensive use of housekeeping and personal care services. • Foodies: They like to cook and prefer natural or organic products. • These investors are financially active, using a number of resources for informed investing. They are not afraid of debt; many households carry first and second mortgages, plus home equity credit lines. • Physically fit, residents actively pursue a number of sports, from skiing to golf, and invest heavily in sports gear and exercise equipment. ESRI INDEXES Esri developed three indexes to display average household wealth, socioeconomic status, and housing affordability for the market relative to US standards. POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Total population, average annual population change since Census 2010, and average density (population per square mile) are displayed for the market relative to the size and change among all Tapestry markets. Data estimated by Esri. LifeMode Group: Af f luent Estates Savvy Suburbanites1D HOUSING Median home value is displayed for markets that are primarily owner occupied; average rent is shown for renter-occupied markets. Tenure and home value are estimated by Esri. Housing type and average rent are from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. Typical Housing: Single Family Median Value: $362,900 US Median: $207,300 High Low TAPESTRYSEGMENTATION TM esri.com/tapestry SEGMENT DENSITY This map illustrates the density and distribution of the Savvy Suburbanites Tapestry Segment by households. LifeMode Group: Af f luent Estates Savvy Suburbanites1D For more information 1-800-447-9778 info@esri.com esri.com Copyright © 2020 Esri. All rights reserved. Esri, the Esri globe logo, Tapestry, @esri.com, and esri.com are trademarks, service marks, or registered marks of Esri in the United States, the European Community, or certain other jurisdictions. Other companies and products or services mentioned herein may be trademarks, service marks, or registered marks of their respective mark owners. G826513 ESRI2C1/20ms TAPESTRYSEGMENTATION TM esri.com/tapestry Households: 1,657,400 Average Household Size: 2.06 Median Age: 52.3 Median Household Income: $71,700 LifeMode Group: Senior St yles Golden Years WHO ARE WE? Independent, active seniors nearing the end of their careers or already in retirement best describes Golden Years residents. This market is primarily singles living alone or empty nesters. Those still active in the labor force are employed in professional occupations; however, these consumers are actively pursuing a variety of leisure interests—travel, sports, dining out, museums, and concerts. They are involved, focused on physical fitness, and enjoying their lives. This market is smaller, but growing, and financially secure. OUR NEIGHBORHOOD • This older market has a median age of 52 years and a disproportionate share (nearly 32%) of residents aged 65 years or older. • Single-person households (over 40%) and married-couple families with no children (one-third) dominate these neighborhoods; average household size is low at 2.06 (Index 80). • Most of the housing was built after 1970; approximately 43% of householders live in single-family homes and 43% in multiunit dwellings. • These neighborhoods are found in large metropolitan areas, outside central cities, scattered across the US. SOCIOECONOMIC TRAITS • Golden Years residents are well educated—22% have graduate or professional degrees, 28% have bachelor’s degrees, and 25% have some college credits. • Unemployment is low at 4% (Index 74), but so is labor force participation at 56% (Index 89), due to residents reaching retirement. • Median household income is higher in this market, more than $71,000. Although wages still provide income to nearly 2 out of 3 households, earned income is available from investments (Index 171), Social Security benefits (Index 146), and retirement income (Index 144). • These consumers are well connected: Internet access is used for everything from shopping or paying bills to monitoring investments and entertainment. • They are generous supporters of the arts and charitable organizations. • They keep their landlines and view cell phones more as a convenience. Note: The Index represents the ratio of the segment rate to the US rate multiplied by 100. Consumer preferences are estimated from data by GfK MRI. 9B TAPESTRYSEGMENTATION TM esri.com/tapestry LifeMode Group: Senior St yles Golden Years9B 85+ 80–84 75–79 70–74 65–69 60–64 55–59 50–54 45–49 40–44 35–39 30–34 25–29 20–24 15–19 10–14 5–9 <5 8% 4% 0 4% 8% Male Female Median Household Income Median Net Worth $56,100 $93,300 $71,700 $184,000 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 Esri Median HH Income Esri Median Net Worth Series2 Series1 $56,100 $93,300 $71,700 $184,000 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 Esri Median HH Income Esri Median Net Worth Series2 Series1 Housing Food Apparel & Services Transportation Health Care Entertainment &Recreation Education Pensions &Social Security Other !"!#$!"%#$&"!#$&"%#$'"!#$'"%#$("!#$("%#$)"!#$ !"#$%&'$%()* !"#$%&'$%+), !"#$%&'$%-()-* !"#$%&'$%-+)-,$ !"#$%&'$%.().* !"#$%&'$%.+).,$ !"#$%&'$%/()/*$ !"#$%&'$%/+)/,$ !"#$%&'$%*()**$ !"#$%&'$%*+)*,$ !"#$%&'$%+()+*$ !"#$%&'$%++)+,$ !"#$%&'$%0()0*$ !"#$%&'$%0+)0,$ !"#$%&'$%1()1*$ !"#$%&'$%1+)1,$ !"#$%&'$%2()2*$ !"#$%&'$%2+3 &'$%45%6$7%)!"#$ 6$89$:.6$89$:- !"!#$%"!#$&"!#$'"!#$("!#$)"!#$*"!#$ !"#$%"&'("&)*+ !"#$%"&'("&,*- !"#$%"&'("&.)*.+ !"#$%"&'("&.,*.- !"#$%"&'("&/)*/+ !"#$%"&'("&/,*/- !"#$%"&'("&0)*0+ !"#$%"&'("&0,*0- !"#$%"&'("&+)*++ !"#$%"&'("&+,*+- !"#$%"&'("&,)*,+ !"#$%"&'("&,,*,- !"#$%"&'("&1)*1+ !"#$%"&'("&1,*1- !"#$%"&'("&2)*2+ !"#$%"&'("&2,*2- !"#$%"&'("&3)*3+ !"#$%"&'("&3,4 56$78&9:8%" ;"7:"</;"7:"<. INCOME AND NET WORTH Net worth measures total household assets (homes, vehicles, investments, etc.) less any debts, secured (e.g., mortgages) or unsecured (credit cards). Household income and net worth are estimated by Esri. OCCUPATION BY EARNINGS The fi ve occupations with the highest number of workers in the market are displayed by median earnings. Data from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD BUDGET INDEX The index compares the average amount spent in this market’s household budgets for housing, food, apparel, etc., to the average amount spent by all US households. An index of 100 is average. An index of 120 shows that average spending by consumers in this market is 20 percent above the national average. Consumer expenditures are estimated by Esri. AGE BY SEX (Esri data) Median Age: 52.3 US: 38.2 Indicates US RACE AND ETHNICITY (Esri data) The Diversity Index summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity). Diversity Index: 43.8 US: 64.0 Hispanic* Multiple Other Asian andPac. Islander AmericanIndian Black White $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 *Hispanic Can Be of Any Race. 0 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0 $100K $200K $300K $400K $500K $600K+ 0 $100K $200K $300K $400K $500K $600K+ US Average.US Median.Median EarningsWorkers (Age 16+) 128 121 122 118 127 124 139 124 127 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Own 62.7% Rent 37.3% Chart Title Own Rent Population Population Growth (Annual %) Population Density (Persons per sq. mile) 350 350 350 0 0 0 900,000 -0.5% 0 11,000,000 3.0% 25,000 3,547,600 0.8% 1000 Wealth Index Socioeconomic Status Index Housing Affordability Index 162 133 100 1,058 Home Ownership US Percentage: 62.7% Own 37.3% Rent TAPESTRYSEGMENTATION TM esri.com/tapestry MARKET PROFILE (Consumer preferences are estimated from data by GfK MRI) • Avid readers, they regularly read daily newspapers, particularly the Sunday edition. • They subscribe to cable TV; news and sports programs are popular as well as on-demand movies. • They use professional services to maintain their homes inside and out and minimize their chores. • Leisure time is spent on sports (tennis, golf, boating, and fishing) or simple exercise like walking. • Good health is a priority; they believe in healthy eating, coupled with vitamins and dietary supplements. • Active social lives include travel, especially abroad, plus going to concerts and museums. • Residents maintain actively managed financial portfolios that include a range of instruments such as IRA’s, common stocks, and certificates of deposit (more than six months). ESRI INDEXES Esri developed three indexes to display average household wealth, socioeconomic status, and housing affordability for the market relative to US standards. POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Total population, average annual population change since Census 2010, and average density (population per square mile) are displayed for the market relative to the size and change among all Tapestry markets. Data estimated by Esri. LifeMode Group: Senior St yles Golden Years9B HOUSING Median home value is displayed for markets that are primarily owner occupied; average rent is shown for renter-occupied markets. Tenure and home value are estimated by Esri. Housing type and average rent are from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. Typical Housing: Single Family; Multi-Units Median Value: $332,100 US Median: $207,300 High Low TAPESTRYSEGMENTATION TM esri.com/tapestry SEGMENT DENSITY This map illustrates the density and distribution of the Golden Years Tapestry Segment by households. LifeMode Group: Senior St yles Golden Years9B For more information 1-800-447-9778 info@esri.com esri.com Copyright © 2020 Esri. All rights reserved. Esri, the Esri globe logo, Tapestry, @esri.com, and esri.com are trademarks, service marks, or registered marks of Esri in the United States, the European Community, or certain other jurisdictions. Other companies and products or services mentioned herein may be trademarks, service marks, or registered marks of their respective mark owners. G826513 ESRI2C1/20ms 5/28/2021 1 Town of Southeast, Putnam County, NY Local Law No. 2 of 2021 A LOCAL LAW entitled: “A Local Law to Amend Chapter 138 of the Town Code, ‘Zoning’.” Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Southeast, Putnam County, New York, as follows: SECTION 1. LEGISLATIVE INTENT The Town Board of the Town of Southeast recently adopted the Route 22 Master Plan, which is an update to the 2007 Route 22 Master Plan and an addendum to the Town’s 2014 Comprehensive Plan Update. Route 22 is a gateway to the Town of Southeast and a major north-south transportation and commercial corridor within the Hudson Valley Region. The Route 22 Master Plan establishes a long-term vision for the Route 22 corridor and is intended to serve as a “blueprint” for future development along Route 22. The Master Plan establishes criteria and design guidelines for the location, design, and orientation of pedestrian improvements, landscaping, stormwater management, and bike and vehicular infrastructure. The purpose of this local law is to implement the zoning recommendations of the Route 22 Master Plan. SECTION 2. PROPERTY AFFECTED The premises affected by this rezoning are described and generally known as the Route 22 Corridor within the Town of Southeast from the terminus of Interstate 684 to the Patterson Town Line. SECTION 3. AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE I, “GENERAL PROVISIONS; DEFINITIONS” Section 138-4.B, “Definitions” is hereby amended, in part, to amend or add the following definitions: CURB-SIDE PICK-UP A designated parking space or drive-up window from which phone, mobile-application, or website take-out orders are picked-up by customers or delivery service providers. Curb-side pick-up windows shall be for pick-up only. LIVE/WORK BUILDING A non age-restricted building which includes a commercial component attached to living quarters occupied by a person or persons, at least one of whom owns or works in the attached commercial component. 5/28/2021 2 MOTOR VEHICLE DEALERSHIP A business primarily engaged in enclosed and accessory outdoor retail sale of new or certified pre-owned automobiles. The primary use shall include the showroom, interior display and storage of vehicles, offices, interior service and repair, vehicle preparation and repair work, and the sale of parts and accessories for said automobiles. Accessory uses include parking for employees, customers, sales, offices and repair services, and the outside storage of motor vehicles for sale. A motor vehicle dealership shall not include a “Gas Station” or “Junkyard” as defined by Section 138-4.B. A Motor Vehicle Dealership shall not operate a towing service. RESTAURANT, FAST CASUAL A restaurant serving food for casual dining, curb-side pick-up, or take-out, where food is primarily prepared to order. The food may be selected from a standardized menu visible behind the counter where the order is placed and no drive-through is provided. Although table service may not be provided, the restaurant provides a comfortable dining atmosphere with tables for patrons. Food is delivered on non-disposable plates, baskets, or similar service ware. SELF-STORAGE Storage of domestic or household objects in individual, fully enclosed storage spaces and outdoor storage of vehicles and boats in a screened enclosure in a facility accessible to the general public for a fee. SELF-STORAGE FACILITY A building or group of buildings in a controlled access and fenced compound that contains varying sizes of individual, compartmentalized, and controlled access stalls or lockers for the storage of customers' business and household goods or contractors' supplies. SECTION 4. AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE II, “ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICTS; MAP” Section 138-5, “Districts Enumerated” is hereby amended, in part, to add a new Rural Commercial 2 (RC-2) Zoning District as follows: District Map Code Rural Commercial 2 RC-2 Section 138-6, “Zoning Map” is hereby amended to rezone the following parcels as indicated below: Tax Identification Number Acres Current Zoning Designation New Zoning Designation 57.-1-7.-101 0.03 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-102 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-103 0.02 SR22 RMF 5/28/2021 3 57.-1-7.-1037 0.04 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-1038 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-1039 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-104 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-1040 0.04 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-1141 0.03 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-1142 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-1143 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-1144 0.03 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-1245 0.03 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-1246 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-1247 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-1248 0.03 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-1349 0.04 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-1350 0.04 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-205 0.03 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-206 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-207 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-208 0.04 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-309 0.03 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-310 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-311 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-312 0.03 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-413 0.04 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-414 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-415 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-416 0.03 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-517 0.04 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-518 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-519 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-520 0.04 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-625 0.03 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-626 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-627 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-628 0.04 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-721 0.03 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-722 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-723 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-724 0.04 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-829 0.03 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-830 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-831 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-832 0.04 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-933 0.03 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-934 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-935 0.02 SR22 RMF 57.-1-7.-936 0.04 SR22 RMF 57.-1-5 10.35 OP-1 SR22 57.-1-6 4.56 OP-1 SR22 57.-1-13 21.00 OP-1 SR22 57.-1-14 3.66 OP-1 SR22 5/28/2021 4 57.-1-15 1.36 OP-1 SR22 57.-1-16 0.64 OP-1 SR22 57.-1-17 7.49 OP-1 SR22 57.-2-29 2.85 OP-1 SR22 57.-2-30 4.91 OP-1 SR22 46.-1-20 0.24 HC SR22 46.-1-21 0.94 HC SR22 46.-1-22 0.34 HC SR22 46.-3-14 2.55 RC HC 46.-3-15 2.22 RC HC 46.-3-16 6.08 RC HC 46.-3-17 21.09 RC OP-1 46.-3-18 2.7 RC OP-1 46.-3-19 0.96 RC OP-1 46.-3-20 1.13 RC OP-1 46.-3-21 0.94 RC OP-1 46.-5-5 2.59 RC OP-1 46.-5-6 1.74 RC OP-1 46.-4-18 0.69 RC RC-2 46.-4-19 0.83 RC RC-2 46.-4-20 2.51 RC RC-2 46.-4-21 1.92 RC RC-2 46.-4-22 1.33 RC RC-2 46.-4-23 1.07 RC RC-2 SECTION 5. AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE V, “NONRESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS” Chapter 138 Attachment 5, “Town of Southeast Commercial Zoning Schedule,” is hereby amended, in part, to add the following uses: District Permitted Principal Uses (see Notes G, N, W, and X and W) Permitted Accessory Uses (see Notes F, H and M) Special Permit Uses Conditional Uses (See Notes Q, S) SR22 Live/Work Restaurant, fast-food Self-storage Motor vehicle dealership Animal hospital Doggie daycare General business Research labs Theater/performing arts HC Restaurant, fast-food Self-storage RC Single family residential 5/28/2021 Chapter 138 Attachment 5, “Town of Southeast Commercial Zoning Schedule,” is hereby amended, in part, to add a new RC-2 Zoning District: District Permitted Principal Uses (see Notes G, N, W, and X) Permitted Accessory Uses (see Notes F, H and M) Special Permit Uses Conditional Uses (See Notes Q, S) Minimum Lot Size Minimum Yards Maximum Coverage Maximum Height Parking Setback Square Feet (thousands) Frontage (feet) Width (feet) Depth (feet) Front (feet) Side (feet) Rear (feet) Building Coverage Floor Area Ratio Lot Coverage Open Space Requirements (percentage of lot) Stories Feet Front (feet) Side (feet) Rear (feet) RC-2 Craft workshop General business Nursery Office Restaurant Recreation Single family residential Outside storage Private utilities Restaurant Retail Personal services Professional services Cemetery Hotel/motel/conference facility Kennels and animal hospitals Public utilities Senior housing Research labs Wood mill Bed-and- breakfast/country inn Equestrian center Farm use Telecommunications Towers and facilities 80 250 250 250 50 25 25 25% 0.25 55% 45% 3 45 25 15 15 See Note D See Note C See Note D See Note P See Note D See Note E 5/28/2021 Chapter 138 Attachment 5, “Town of Southeast Commercial Zoning Schedule,” is hereby amended, in part, as follows: * All special permit uses are subject to site plan and architectural review by the Planning Board/Architectural Review Board, except as otherwise set forth in this chapter, and architectural review by the Architectural Review Board. Note F: Permitted accessory uses are not to exceed 20% of the total gross floor area of permitted space for all uses, except as noted herein. , except outside storage, which shall not exceed 5% of the lot area except as otherwise provided in Article IX, § 138-46L. Outside storage shall not exceed 5% of the lot area except as otherwise provided in Article IX, § 138-46L. Accessory residential in the SR22 Zoning District shall not exceed 40% of the gross floor area. Chapter 138 Attachment 5, “Town of Southeast Commercial Zoning Schedule,” is hereby amended, in part, to add a new Note X: Note X: In the RC and RC-2 Zoning Districts single family residential uses are permitted at the same density as the R-160 Zoning District. SECTION 6. AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE IX, “SITE PLAN REVIEW AND APPROVAL” Section 138-50.1, “Landscape Standards for Route 22” is hereby added as follows: A. Objective. The Route 22 Corridor from the terminus of Interstate 684 to the Patterson Town line is a gateway to the Town of Southeast. A consistent landscaping approach is an important solution to tie the disparate architecture along Route 22 together. B. Rural Zone. The rural zones are defined as the segments of Route 22 from the terminus of Interstate 684 to its intersection with Milltown Road and the northernmost intersection with Old Doansburg Road to the Patterson Town line. Within the rural zones an emphasis should be placed on preserving and enhancing the rural landscape. Landscaping should incorporate the following features: (1) Native trees, shrubs, and wildflowers. (2) Maintain stone walls. C. Transitional Zone. The transitional zones are defined as the segment of Route 22 from its intersection with Milltown Road to its intersection with Clocktower Commons Drive, and its intersection with Route 312 to its northernmost intersection with Old Doansburg Road. Within the transitional zones an emphasis should be placed on connecting outlying residential areas to the commercial core. Landscaping should incorporate the following features: (1) Introduce sidewalks and pedestrian amenities to connect residential areas to commercial areas where feasible. (2) Maintain a landscaped buffer between sidewalks and Route 22 where feasible. (3) Formal entrance plantings at driveways on Route 22. 5/28/2021 7 D. Commercial Zone. The commercial zone is defined as the segment of Route 22 from its intersection with Clocktower Commons Drive to its intersection with Route 312. Within the commercial zone an emphasis should be place on the pedestrian experience. Landscaping should incorporate the following features: (1) Require sidewalks and pedestrian connections between developments. (2) Maintain a landscaped buffer between sidewalks and Route 22 where feasible. (3) Formal entrance plantings at driveways on Route 22, including the use of annuals and seasonal displays. (4) No more than 25% of a property’s road frontage may be stormwater management basins. (5) Street trees at regular intervals, and no less than 2.5” caliper at the time of planting. E. Guiderails. Where necessary, all guiderails should be steel-backed timber. F. Preferred plantings. (1) Trees. (a) American Elm – Umus americana (Princeton or Valley Forge) (b) Honey Locust – Geditsia triacanthos (c) Linden – Tilia americana (d) Red Maple – Acer rubrum (e) White Oak – Quercus alba (2) Preferred native shrubs and small trees. (a) Bayberry – Myrica pensylvanica (b) Blueberry Highbush – Vaccinium corymbosum (c) Chokeberry – Aronia (d) Hydrangeas – Hydrangea querifolia or Hydrangea macrophylla (e) Inkberry – Ilex glabra (f) Junipers – Juniperus Bar Harbor or Juniperus communis (g) Ninebark – Hysocarpus (h) Redbud – Cercis canadensis (i) Serviceberry – Amelanchier laevis (j) Summersweet – Clethra alnifolia (k) Winterberry – Ilex verticillate (l) Witch Hazel – Hamamelis x intermedia (3) Preferred non-native ornamental shrubs. (a) Lilac – Syringa pubescens ‘Miss Kim’ or Syringa meyeri ‘Palibin’ (b) Mugo Pine – Pinus mugo 5/28/2021 8 (4) Preferred native perennials. (a) Aster (New York or New England) – Aster nova-belgii or novae angliae (b) Bee Balm – Monarda (c) Black-Eyed Susan – Rudbeckia (d) Bluestar – Amsonia tabernaemontanta (e) Cone Flower – Echinacea (f) Coral Bells – Heuchera americanea (g) Goldenrod – Solidago (h) Yarrow – Achillea millefolium (5) Preferred non-native perennials. (a) Day Lily – Hemerocallis fulva (b) Russian Sage – Salvia yangii SECTION 7. AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE X, “SPECIAL PERMITS AND CONDITIONAL USES” A new Section 138-56.3, “Live/Work Buildings” is hereby added as follows: Live/Work buildings are subject to the following supplementary requirements: A. All Live/Work units shall be a studio or one-bedroom units. B. Each Live/Work unit must be individually equipped with an enclosed bathroom containing a sink, toilet, shower or tub, and appropriate venting. C. Each Live/Work unit must be individually equipped with a kitchen consisting of a sink, non-portable stove, oven and refrigerator. D. The commercial component shall be a minimum of 60% of the gross floor area of the total development. E. Direct access between living and working areas must be provided. A new Section 138-60.2, “Self-Storage Facilities” is hereby added as follows: Self-storage buildings are subject to the following supplementary requirements: A. All buildings shall be of masonry or wood-frame construction on that portion of the building which faces on the street. B. Building colors shall be earth-toned. C. All self-storage units shall be accessible from the interior of the building. Exterior overhead garage style doors for individual storage units are prohibited. D. A minimum of 25% of the façade shall be translucent windows. E. Garage doors for individual storage units shall not be visible through exterior windows. 5/28/2021 9 F. Loading docks shall not face the primary street and shall be buffered from neighboring properties with fencing, a berm, and/or landscaping. G. No outdoor storage shall be permitted. H. Hours of operation shall be regulated by the special use permit and shall be noted on the site plan. I. Appropriate buffers between any component of the proposed use and adjoining properties, given the proposed use, the use of adjoining parcels, and the natural topography and vegetative cover, shall be established by the special use permit and shall be identified on the site plan. J. Self-storage shall only be permitted on Route 22. Section 138-61, Fast-food eating establishments, is hereby amended in part as follows: Fast-food eating establishments, as defined in Article I of this chapter under "restaurant, fast- food," shall be subject to the following supplementary requirements: A. No fast-food business shall be located within 1,000 feet of any other fast-food business or within 200 feet of a residential district line or property line of a school or church. Said 1,000 200 feet shall be measured from the nearest point of the building used or proposed for fast food. B. Adequate receptacles shall be provided for the deposit of all waste materials and the same shall be screened with planting or fencing from all adjacent property and streets. C. The Planning Board may limit lighting, signage or other outside activity such as drive-in services that would cause an adverse impact on adjacent nearby residential properties. D. The design of any fast-food establishment shall include materials and design elements in context with the Town's community character. The Planning Board/Architectural Review Board shall have the authority to request revisions to prototypical designs to ensure continued consistency of the Town's character and to avoid "placeless" architecture created by repetitive or iconic design. E. All applications for new drive-throughs shall be required to prepare a traffic impact analysis, including a queuing analysis, and traffic mitigation plan. Drive-throughs on Route 22 north of Interstate 684 shall have access to a fully signalized intersection. A new traffic signal may be installed if a traffic signal warrant study determines that a traffic signal is warranted and the New York State Department of Transportation grants approvals for the traffic signal. Unless signalized, entrances on Route 22 shall be right- turn in and right-turn out only with signage and striping to restrict left-turn access. Access to the signalized intersection can be provided via access easements across adjacent properties or through driveway exits onto County or Town roads that have a signalized intersection with Route 22. Section 138-63.6, Special Route 22 Area District, is hereby amended in part as follows: A. All applications for development within the Special Route 22 Area District shall require site plan approval in compliance with Article IX, Site Plan Review and Approval, and shall require conditional use or special permit approval from the Planning or Town 5/28/2021 10 Board, respectively, in compliance with this section. The provisions of § 138-63.5, Retail, are specifically superseded by this section for any retail use proposed in the Special Route 22 Area District but remain in effect for any retail use proposed in any other zoning district. B. Dimensional standards. All new construction shall be designed to be consistent with the Route 22 Area Master Plan and Aerial View, but in no case shall overall floor area ratio for a parcel exceed 0.150.25, and building height shall not exceed 35 45 feet. The Planning Board for conditional use permits or the Town Board for special permits may allow a single anchor tenants exceeding 50,000 square feet in gross floor area, subject to the provisions of § 138-63.6C(2)(a)[1], when the Town Board determines that such a use will be necessary to ensure the viability of commercial activity within the Special Route 22 Area District. Such a larger use may only be considered as part of an integrated master plan that implements a substantial majority of the Route 22 Area Master Plan. C. Design guidelines. All uses within the Special Route 22 Area District shall be consistent with the design intent of the Route 22 Area Master Plan Conceptual Building Elevations and Conceptual Streetscape to the greatest extent practicable given natural resources constraints. In addition, the Planning Board, when considering design elements relevant to the site plan and conditional use permit, and the Town Board, when considering overall design of a project relevant to the special permit, shall consider the application's conformance to the following design guidelines in considering approval or denial of the application. In any case where any provision within these design guidelines appears to conflict with the Route 22 Area Master Plan drawings, the Town Board shall have the sole authority to consider which provision shall apply. (1) Site design. (a) Building location. [1] Buildings shall be oriented on site to avoid disturbance to sensitive natural and topographic features to the maximum extent practicable while presenting a "public face" to major roads. [2] Multiple buildings on a single site shall be oriented to achieve a unified character for the site. Individual buildings shall not be isolated by large expanses of parking lots in order to encourage safe pedestrian movement within the site. (b) Site access. [1] Driveway entrances and exits onto any street shall be provided in such a manner that no undue traffic hazards or traffic congestion will be created. Interconnections between properties and/or shared driveways shall be provided wherever possible. Driveway entrances on Route 22, where provided, shall be spaced a minimum of 300 feet apart. Driveways shall not exceed 30 feet in width at the street line, unless a greater width is required by the County of Putnam or State of New York. [2] Implementation of the Special Route 22 Area District shall follow the Route 22 Collector Road Alignment as indicated in the Town of Southeast Comprehensive Plan. 5/28/2021 11 (c) Parking lots. [1] Parking rates shall be calculated using the Urban Land Institute Shared Parking Methodology to calculate appropriate parking requirements for proposed uses. [2] Any parking spaces provided above the required number shall be in a separate parking area utilizing a pervious paving technique. Alternatively, additional parking areas may be "land- banked" for future development depending on use. [3] All required parking shall be provided in parking areas that are designed and laid out to avoid uninterrupted stretches of paved surfaces. Parking areas may be separated from each other by drive aisles, pedestrian walkways, stormwater management facilities, or landscaped areas. Parking areas to the rear or side of buildings are preferred to parking areas in front of (between the major street and any side of) a building. Rear entrances to tenant spaces shall be considered in the overall site design process. Underground or structured parking may be considered and shall not be included in gross floor area. [4] Individual parking stalls shall be nine feet by 18 feet, except as required to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. Parking stalls in employee parking areas may be eight feet by 18 feet. [5] Parking areas shall have a minimum ten-foot-wide curbed planting island around the perimeter with appropriate gaps for vehicular access. Such raised planting islands and the landscaping within them shall be designed and arranged in such a way as to provide vertical definition to major traffic circulation aisles, entrances and exits, to channel internal traffic flow and prevent indiscriminate diagonal movement of vehicles and to provide relief from the visual monotony and shadeless expanse of a large parking area. Planted bioswales may be substituted for raised parking islands. [6] Large parking areas of 50 spaces or more shall have additional planting islands a minimum of eight feet in width within the parking area between every second parking module (defined as a sixty-foot-wide area containing two rows of parking separated by a drive aisle). [7] There shall be a provision for separate pedestrian flow to building entrance(s) outside of drive aisles for each parking area. [8] Twenty-five percent of calculated required parking shall be provided in a designated employee-only parking area that utilizes a pervious paving technique. Where possible, this parking area shall be located to the rear of any building(s). 5/28/2021 12 [9] Twenty-five percent of calculated required parking shall be provided in an overflow area that shall be physically separated from other parking areas by lawn or other vegetated area. [10] At least one tree, not less than three inches in caliper, measured three feet above ground level at time of planting, shall be provided within a planting island for each 10 parking spaces in the parking area. [11] Bicycle parking racks shall be provided in a location no further than 200 feet from a building entrance and not to the rear of any building. (d) Circulation to adjoining parcels. [1] Where any use adjoins another parcel with existing commercial development, every opportunity for connecting parking areas and/or driveways shall be explored to avoid separate curb cuts onto major roads. [2] Where any use adjoins a vacant commercially zoned parcel, a stub driveway shall be established in a location conducive to creating a future internal connection point. (e) Pedestrian environment. [1] Pedestrian-scale public spaces (pedestrian walkway, square, or plaza) shall be integrated into the overall site plan to provide meaningful circulation and seating areas. [2] Pedestrian amenities, such as seating or dining areas, fountains, gazebos, kiosks, or other such features, shall be provided in any square or plaza. Amenities associated with public transit or bicycle use (bus waiting shelter, information kiosk with bus schedule, bicycle racks, or taxi waiting area) shall be incorporated into public spaces on the site. [3] A pedestrian walkway shall be a minimum of 10 feet in width and shall have street trees planted 40 feet on center at a minimum (not less than three inches in caliper measured three feet above ground level at time of planting). Pedestrian walkways offering access between buildings and/or providing access to rear parking areas are not required to have planting areas or street trees. [4] A square or plaza shall be a minimum of 30 feet in any dimension and shall include a vegetated area covering a minimum of 50% of the total area when any one linear dimension of the square or plaza equals or exceeds 50 feet. (Pedestrian walkways shall not be required to meet this standard). [5] Building(s) shall be designed to have a front facade that has at least one principal functional entry from a pedestrian walkway, square, or plaza. 5/28/2021 13 [6] No ground-level facade shall have blank (without doors or windows) walls longer than 50 feet along any pedestrian walkway, square, or plaza. Public art installations such as murals are exempt from this requirement. [7] Pedestrian walkways, squares, or plazas shall provide continuous pedestrian flow throughout the site and shall provide protected access through a designated crosswalk or walkway between building entrances and all parking areas. [8] Pedestrian walkways, squares, and plazas shall be integrated into the overall landscaping and lighting plans for the site. [9] Pedestrian walkways and other surface areas of paving material shall offer a variety of pigments and textures that are in harmony with nearby buildings and other paved surfaces and are safe for pedestrian traffic, including the handicapped. Pervious surfaces shall be used wherever practicable to minimize the need for stormwater infrastructure. (f) Loading and refuse collection areas. [1] All loading and refuse collection areas shall be screened from public views from primary driveways and pedestrian walkways, squares, or plazas and shall not be located along the front facade of any building or within any parking area. Loading and refuse collection areas shall be internal to a structure to the extent possible. (g) Signage. [1] All signs shall be carefully integrated with other site design elements. Signs shall be designed so that they are visible and informative at the pedestrian scale. Signs shall not be mounted above the eave line of any structure or be placed in or attached to any window. Signs must comply with the provisions in Article XII of this chapter. (h) Lighting. [1] A site lighting plan shall be provided in conformance with Article XVII of this chapter. Pedestrian-scale lighting fixtures shall be provided in parking areas and along pedestrian walkways and in squares or plazas. (i) Storage of merchandise. [1] Any areas intended for storage or display of merchandise shall be identified on the site plan and shall be approved by the Town Board as part of the special permit process. [2] Vending machines, ice machines, newspaper boxes, or similar equipment may not be located outside of any building. (2) Building design. (a) Building size. 5/28/2021 14 [1] Large single-use buildings are to be avoided. Where a large tenant is considered, the same building shall include several smaller tenants with separate exterior access to balance the scale of the larger tenant and to facilitate improved building design. No single building shall have a building footprint exceeding 80,000 square feet. (b) Building height. [1] Buildings may be one or two stories to a maximum height of 35 45 feet. Vertical elements such as clock towers, cupolas, or other architectural embellishments may extend the total height of the building but shall be no greater than 50 feet in height. (c) Building style. [1] Buildings shall be designed to be consistent with the Special Route 22 Area Master Plan and in all cases shall be of high- quality design and materials. (d) Building facades and materials. [1] Building facades shall present a varied appearance at street level and be designed to give individual identity to each building and/or use as well as to help achieve the planned pedestrian scale using features such as: [a] The height of cornices, lintels and sill levels, articulated floor levels and other horizontal building features. [b] The spacing and proportion of columns, piers and other elements of the basic structural grid. [c] The spacing and proportion of window and door openings, bays or other aspects of building fenestration. [d] Colors, textures and the general nature of exterior materials and treatment, including building ornament and trim. [2] Blank wall exposures shall be limited. No ground-level facade shall have blank (without doors or windows) walls longer than 50 feet along any pedestrian walkway, square, or plaza. Public art installations such as murals are exempt from this requirement. [3] The design of building facades shall reflect the scale of existing or planned building development through modulation of vertical and horizontal elements by features such as: [a] Variation in roof heights. [b] Changes in the predominant wall plane and/or in facade elements, such as window openings and balconies. [c] Use of horizontal projections or recesses in the building facade, such as bay windows, cornices, balustrades, etc. 5/28/2021 15 [d] Use of pitched roofs and other roof elements, such as cross gables, dormer windows, turrets, and clock towers, to provide visual interest, reduce the scale of continuous roofs and break the line where the building meets the sky. [4] Treatment of the sides and rear of proposed buildings shall be in a manner substantially consistent in appearance, amenity and quality of materials to the treatment given to their front facade. [5] Building facades shall be architecturally articulated horizontally so that there are breaks in the facade plane where building entrances, windows, or landscaped areas may be located. [6] Building facades shall be architecturally articulated vertically to define a pedestrian scale along any pedestrian walkway, square, or plaza. Arcades, awnings, rooflines or eave lines, or second- story windows may be used to define the pedestrian scale. [Any awning, roof, or eave that extends above a pedestrian walkway, square, or plaza shall have a minimum clear height (height from the sidewalk to the bottom of any awning, roof, or eave) of eight feet six inches and a maximum clear height of 10 feet above the sidewalk and shall extend beyond the building face a minimum of five feet.] [7] All buildings shall have an appropriate rhythm of entrances and windows consistent with the overall size of the building and orientation to any pedestrian walkways, squares, or plazas. [8] Exterior cladding shall be consistent with the overall building style and shall include a variety of colors and textures to help articulate the main facades. (e) Building roofs. [1] Fully enclosed gabled roofs (minimum pitch of 8:12) are preferred to flat roofs with parapets. On larger buildings, a variety of rooflines shall be used to break up the horizontal extent of the building. Where parapets are used, the parapet shall be provided along each facade. Parapet height is limited to 10 feet above the flat roof. [2] Where flat roofs are required due to building size, roofing materials having a solar reflectance index (SRI) equal to or greater than the values in the table below for a minimum of 75% of the roof surface shall be used or a green roof on at least 50% of the roof area shall be used. Roof Type Slope SRI Low-sloped roof Less than or equal to 2:12 78 Steep-sloped roof Greater than 2:12 29 (f) Building materials. 5/28/2021 16 [1] While synthetic materials may be acceptable, natural building materials, including but not limited to clapboard and shingle siding, brick, stone, glass, or glass block are preferred and encouraged over synthetic materials. Generic, unadorned concrete masonry units (CMUs) shall not be used as a primary exposed building material on any facade. CMUs with any type of variegated surface (e.g., architectural block or split-faced CMUs) are permitted but shall not comprise the majority of the surface area of any one facade. [2] Treatment of the sides and rear of proposed buildings shall be in a manner substantially consistent in appearance, amenity and quality of materials to the treatment given to their street frontage. [3] Windows and doors shall be trimmed with wood or stone a minimum of four inches in width. (g) Mechanical equipment. [1] All HVAC or similar equipment shall be screened from ground- level views and views from any roads or adjoining properties at a higher elevation. D. The developer shall provide adequate proof to the Town Board, prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy, that the developer has contracted with a private security company for the purpose of patrolling the premises for the safety and security of its customers, employees and businesses invitees and to ensure that the premises do not become a focal point for loitering or vagrancy. Such contract, or replacements thereof, shall remain in full force and effect during the occupancy of any premises developed hereunder. Failure to adequately maintain security services for the premises shall result in the revocation of any certificate of occupancy by the Town of Southeast. E. The Town Board may require the inclusion of any of the foregoing conditions in a declaration of restrictive covenants executed in recordable form and to be recorded by the applicant/owner as a condition of any special permit approval. Section 138-63.9, “Motor Vehicle Dealership” is hereby amended in part as follows: A motor vehicle dealership shall be subject to the following special permit conditions: A. Motor vehicle dealerships in existence prior to 2004 shall be considered legally preexisting nonconforming. Improvements to said dealerships shall be required to comply with the following criteria to the greatest extent practicable given the existing lot size, road frontage, and other dimensional constraints. B. Motor vehicle dealerships shall be designed and constructed in accordance with dimensional criteria in the Commercial Zoning Schedule applicable to the zone, except for the following: (1) The minimum lot size shall be 15.0 4 acres. 5/28/2021 17 (2) A minimum fifty-foot-wide landscaped buffer shall be provided in the front, rear, and side yards. Vehicle parking and storage shall be prohibited within the fifty-foot buffer. (3) A minimum of 10% of the parking lot and vehicle storage area shall be landscaped. The fifty-foot-wide buffer shall not contribute towards this requirement. Bioswales and rain gardens within landscaped islands may be counted towards this requirement. (4) A minimum building size of 5,000 square feet for sales facilities and 7,500 square feet for combined sales and service facilities. C. No exterior public address systems shall be permitted. D. No exterior display of banners, pennants, ribbons, dancing tube signs, or similar temporary advertising materials shall be permitted. E. Employee parking shall be designated and provided on site. Parking areas designated for employees shall not be used for vehicle storage, repair or finishing work, display or customer parking. F. Customer parking shall be designated and provided on site. Parking areas designated for customers shall not be used for vehicle storage, repair or finishing work, display or employee parking. G. All employee parking and on-site motor vehicle storage shall be located in the rear of the building and shall be screened from adjacent properties and public rights-of-way. H. Outdoor vehicle display areas shall be designated on the site plan. Vehicle display areas should be landscaped, and should not be part of the customer parking area. Metal vehicle display ramps or similar movable vehicle display devices are prohibited. Vehicle display areas are not permitted within the fifty-foot buffer. I. Off-site new motor vehicle storage shall be permitted subject to the following conditions: (1) The primary lot on which the motor vehicle dealership is located is less than five acres. (2) Off-site new motor vehicle storage shall be subject to the regulations outlined in the Commercial Zoning Schedule that are applicable to the zoning district in which the off-site lot is located, and shall be regulated as "outside storage." (3) Off-site new motor vehicle storage shall be within 0.5 mile of the motor vehicle dealership location. (4) Such off-site new motor vehicle storage shall not be used for vehicle display or customer interaction. (5) Off-site new motor vehicle storage shall be suitably screened from public view through landscaping, berms, and/or fencing. Chain link fencing with plastic privacy slats or similar shall be prohibited. (6) Off-site storage of used or preowned vehicles is prohibited. J. The hours of loading and unloading of vehicles shall be determined by the Town Board. All loading and unloading shall occur on the subject site and not in or on the public right-of-way. 5/28/2021 18 K. Vehicles to be repaired or serviced shall not be parked or stored on any street or public right-of-way. L. Motor vehicle dealerships on Route 22 north of Interstate 684 shall have access to a fully signalized intersection. A new traffic signal may be installed if a traffic signal warrant study determines that a traffic signal is warranted and the New York State Department of Transportation grants approvals for the traffic signal. Unless signalized, entrances on Route 22 shall be right-turn in and right-turn out only with signage and striping to restrict left-turn access. Access to the signalized intersection can be provided via access easements across adjacent properties or through driveway exits onto County or Town roads that have a signalized intersection with Route 22. SECTION 8. VALIDITY The invalidity of any word, section, clause, paragraph, sentence, part, provision of this Local Law shall not affect the validity of any other part of this Local Law that shall be given effect without such invalid part or parts. SECTION 9. EFFECTIVE DATE This Local Law shall take effect immediately upon filing with the Secretary of State. APPENDIX A STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES Prepared for:Prepared by: Village of Hempstead Strategic Development Opportunities revitalization potential in the heart of Long Island Village of Hempstead Strategic Development Opportunities The Village of Hempstead, through its Community Development Agency (CDA), has been actively facilitating the redevelopment and revitalization of downtown Hempstead for over a decade. As a continuation of those efforts, the Village has prepared a Brownfield Opportunity Areas (BOA) Program Step 2 Nomination1, administered by the New York State Department of State (NYSDOS).2 A “brownfield” is any real property, the redevelopment or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a contaminant, as defined by the New York State Environmental Conservation Law Article 27, Title 14. Alternatively, “a brownfield is a property that is underutilized due to an assumption of contamination that has not been redeveloped due to the perceived cost of remediation.”3 The BOA Program provides municipalities and community organizations with technical and financial assistance of up to 90 percent of the total eligible costs, to complete brownfield redevelopment planning and site assessments on Strategic Sites. Through the Village’s BOA planning process and inventory and analysis, 10 Strategic Sites have been identified as having the potential to catalyze redevelopment throughout the Hempstead BOA. Strategic Sites were chosen based on factors such as size, location, capacity for redevelopment, potential to spur additional economic development, potential to improve quality of life or to site new public amenities, owner willingness, and adequacy of infrastructure, transportation systems, and utilities. This marketing brochure visually highlights these Strategic Sites, outlines their potential uses, and provides context for key community assets within their vicinity. Areas within the BOA were further conceptualized, to express certain potential synergies between uses. These include: a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Zone, Health and Community Facilities Hub, Downtown Core, and an Innovation District. Investment in Strategic Sites has the potential to result in tremendous benefits, including: • Community support; • Potentially lower purchase prices;4 • Access to information about potential site con- tamination that may aid in accurately estimating development;5 • Increased availability of tax credits6 (e.g., BOA Bump-Up7); and • Opportunity Zone benefits.8 Opportunity Zones Recent legislation, by way of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, has further incentivized investing in properties within New York State Opportunity Zones. In essence, this Act allows taxpayers with taxable capital gains from the sale of any asset, who reinvest those gains within 180 days of the date of sale into a “Qualified Opportunity Zone Property,” to become eligible to receive significant tax benefits. As illustrated herein, there are a number of properties within the Hempstead BOA that are also in the Hempstead Opportunity Zone. Location and History The proposed BOA is located in the Village of Hempstead, Nassau County, New York. The Village is located in the center of Nassau County, approx- imately 16 miles east of Queens, New York City. First settled in 1643, the Village is one of the oldest communities on Long Island. Today’s street network is still an indication of the past importance of the Village, as it is where many of the County’s major roads intersect. Historically, Hempstead had been the center of commercial activity for the eastern- 24 24Old Franklin StKellum Pl W. Colum bi a StMain S t Gr e e nw i c h S t He n r y S tClinton StN. Frank l in S t Washing ton S t Cathed ra l AveHil ton AveTerrance Ave Centre S t Washing ton S t Front St Orchard St Hempst e a d T ur n pi k e Penin s ul a Blv d. Miller Pl Wendell S t Meadow S t Jackson St Fulton A v eOld Franklin StKellum Pl W. Colum bi a StMain S t Gr e e nw i c h S t He n r y S tClinton StN. Frank l in S t Washing ton S t Cathed ra l AveHil ton AveTerrance Ave Centre S t Washing ton S t Front St Orchard St Hempst e a d T ur n pi k e Penin s ul a Blv d. Miller Pl Wendell S t Meadow S t Jackson St Fulton A v e 1 2 3 4 5 6 78 9 10 LIRR Hempstead Station Rosa Parks Transit Center Hempstead Village Hall Hempstead Public Library Nassau County District Court Town of Hempstead Buildings Department To Southern State Expressway To Molloy College/ Mercy Medical Center To Queens/NYC To Adelphi University To NYC Winthrop Hospital To Hofstra University Nassau Community College Sloan Kettering Hospital Nassau Coliseum Cradle of Aviation Museum Nassau Firefighters Museum African American Museum of Nassau County South Nassau Communities Hospital Hempstead Golf & Country Club Brierly Park LONG ISLAND RA IL ROAD VILLAGE OF HEMPSTEAD BOA N Hempstead BOA: Strategic Sites and Key Assets 0 500 1000 FEET Proposed BOA Opportunity Zone Census Tract 4068.01 Census Tract 4068.02 Conceptual Development Areas Transit Oriented Development Zone Downtown Core Health and Community Facilities Hub Innovation District Strategic Sites Conifer-Carman Place Independent Living - Estrella BRP - Alta Dell Bus Project Former Bus Station Main St and Fulton Ave Woolworth Site Nagasaki Site N. Franklin St and Jackson St Innovation District 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Brownfields are now eligible to receive tax incentives under the Opportunity Zone (OZ) program. The Hempstead BOA is prime for OZ investment, which provides tremendous potential to put capital to work in the critical pre-development phase, such as for site assessment and remediation. Village of Hempstead Strategic Development Opportunities most communities of Long Island, where the farm- ing communities traded their goods. From its role as the marketplace of agricultural goods, the Village grew into commercial and shopping hub with sever- al department stores in its downtown area. The rise of the shopping centers and malls in Hempstead’s vicinity ultimately led to its decline as a commer- cial center on the island. In the 1990s, many sites, including the former Times Square Property and former Abraham & Straus department store, which used to be the country’s largest grossing suburban department store, were demolished to make room for large-format retail de- velopment and housing. In recent years, the Village has refocused on its assets and strengths to encourage re- development and revitaliza- tion. Such strengths include its eager and diverse work- force and outstanding loca- tional characteristics. Assets The Village is surrounded by a variety of important regional resources, including govern- mental, educational, transpor- tation and cultural assets. Government Assets As the traditional heart of Nassau County, the Village includes a number of government organizations including the Nassau County District Court, Village government offices, and certain Town of Hempstead government offices, and is located near many other government offices located north of the Village in Garden City and Mineola, for example. Transportation Assets The Village serves as a primary transportation hub of Nassau County. Located adjacent to downtown is the Hempstead train station, which serves as the terminus of the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) Hempstead Branch, and the adjacent Rosa Parks Hempstead Transit Center is the hub of the NICE bus system. West of downtown the West Hempstead Branch of the LIRR also terminates just at the Village border. It is also where many of the County’s roads intersect (e.g., Route 24-Hempstead Turnpike [Fulton Avenue], which connects the Cross Island Parkway at the border of Queens County [west] to Meadowbrook State Parkway [east]; Peninsula Boulevard, which connects Cedarhurst [southwest] to the Nassau Veterans Memorial Coliseum/Hofstra University [northeast]; Henry Street/Baldwin Road, which connects to Southern State Parkway and Route 27 [south]; and Clinton Street, which connects to Route 25 and Northern State Parkway [north]). Educational and Institutional Assets The Village is located in proximity to four major institutions of higher education within Nassau County, including: 1) Nassau County Community College (NCC) and 2) Hofstra University, which are located just east of the Village and provide workforce training and other educational opportunities for Village residents; 3) Adelphi College, located just to the northwest of the Village within Garden City, and 4) Molloy College, located south of the Village towards Rockville Centre. These institutions both draw substantial numbers of students and researchers to the area, and serve as a hub for research and development in a number of fields including medical technology. Each of these educational institutions could have the potential to attract funding for a variety of projects and programs within the BOA. In addition, the Village is located in proximity to or has within its municipal boundaries, several health care institutions, including: Hempstead General Medical Center; Mercy Medical Center; Sloan Kettering Hospital; Nassau University Medical Center; South Nassau Communities Hospital; NYU Winthrop Hospital; Mount Sinai South Nassau Hospital; and many others. These institutions have the potential to provide synergistic opportunities for employment and training, and potentially to attract funding for medical occupation and related programs within the BOA. Cultural Assets Numerous cultural assets and attractions are located near and within the Village. These assets have the potential to assist in generating more visitation and commercial activity within the BOA. The African American Museum of Nassau County puts on exhibits, provides gallery space to local artists, and maintains a regional genealogical research archive. With enhanced programming and redevelopment, the museum could become major anchor downtown. To the east, the Nassau County Veterans Memorial Coliseum, the Cradle of Aviation Museum, and Nassau County Firefighters Museum attract large numbers of visitors annually. Connecting to these regional assets could help the Village to tap into these visitor streams and capture a portion of their expenditure potential. State and Federal grant opportunities give priority to redevelopment projects that are within an Opportunity Zone and/or a BOA, thereby providing the maximum incentive for leveraging of funding streams and redevelopment of the Strategic Sites within downtown Hempstead. N O 1 / CONIFER CARMEN PLACE Located within a five minute walking distance to the train station, this site has access from both Columbia and Bidell Streets, provides opportunity for mixed-use pedestrian oriented development with a new plaza or open space for the community. Given that this site is close to other strategic sites, it will increase the use of pedestrian pathways and the use of public transportation. N O 4 / DELL BUS PROJECT The Dell Bus project which’ll include the school bus operators’ headquarters and training facility, is anticipated to bring new transportation workers to the area, promoting commercial activity in the midday hours as well as the evening. This will increase the overall pedestrian footfall in the area and increase demand for associated services in a working district such as, lunch places, café and other eateries. N O 3 / BRP - ALTA / 257 MAIN STREET The BRP-ALTA site is located within a short walk from the Hempstead LIRR station and Transit Center. This site can serve as another anchor for the northern portion of Downtown, increasing residential density near transit, as well as provide an example of a new mixed-use development within the Village of Hempstead. N O 2 / INDEPENDENT LIVING / ESTRELLA The Estrella site is a site in the heart of the Village’s Downtown and close to other potential development sites. It would create assisted living housing proximate to public transporation for people with special needs. AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT ZONE Master Developoment Sites Vacant / Underutilized Strategic Sites Strategic Sites Owned by Master Developer Legend: N O 7 / WOOLWORTH SITE / 300 MAIN ST. The L shaped Woolworth Site fronts both Main and Fulton Streets and can strengthen the mixed use character of the Downtown by offering opportunities for expanded local retail, dining or education for the local community. The site currently has two floors of built structure with generous ceiling heights and can be repurpsoed and reused. N O 6 / FULTON AND MAIN STREET INTERSECTION This key intersection where both regional traffic and local pedestrian movements converge, can support a higher density of mixed use development including retail, community, commercial and cultural uses. As these uses develop, public investment in pedestrian enhancements, safety, lighting and façade improvements will bring more vitality and activity to Downtown. N O 8 / NAGASAKI SITE / 274 FULTON ST. 274 Fulton Street is another site advantageously located on the continuous strip of retail on Fulton Street that captures traffic flow from NY State Route 24 and has great visibility. The single story structure currently on the site, offers transparancy on Fulton Street and has a large floor plate which is ideal for hosting events / weddings and also as a job training / education center for the community. AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM DOWNTOWN CORE Master Developoment Sites Strategic Sites With Buildings Vacant / Underutilized Strategic Sites Strategic Sites Owned by Master Developer Legend: NY State Rt 102 Orchard S t Cooper St N Nichols Ct Centre St Newmans C t NY State Rt 2 4 Fulton Ave Front St Grove St Jackson S t Meadow St W C olumb ia St Bedell S t Stowe Pl Intersection S t Sm ith St Sammis P l Miller Pl Union Pl Kendig Pl Kellum Pl Mai n S t High S t Lib e r t y C tTer ra c e A veHil ton A ve Bell S tCathed ra l A ve Main S t Atlantic Ave Old Franklin StGr e e n w i c h S t Fr a n k l in S t President St C o ve r t S t C h a s n e r S t Henry S tClin ton S tWashing ton S tSta t ion P lazaMeadow P l Peninsula BlvdTO HOFSTRA TO ADELPHI N O 1 / CONIFER CARMEN PLACE Located within a five minute walking distance to the train station, this site has access from both Columbia and Bidell Streets, provides opportunity for a mixed-use pedestrian oriented development with a new plaza or open space for the community. Given that this site is close to other strategic sites, this cluster of density offers the opportunity to create new pedestrian pathways and enhance existing ones to create enhanced mobility and generate activity. N O 9 / FRANKLIN AND JACKSON INTERSECTION This intersection has a key cultural institution - The African American Museum, which acts as a prominent anchor and invites further development at this location. N O 5 / HEMPSTEAD BUS STATION This site could be tenanted with a range of office uses, including social service providers, or continue to be used for educational programming. N O 3 / BRP - ALTA / 257 MAIN STREET The BRP-ALTA site is located within a short walk from the Hempstead LIRR station and Transit Center. This site can serve as another anchor for the northern portion of Downtown, an increasing residential density near transit, as well as provide an example of a new mixed-use development within the Village of Hempstead N O 2 / INDEPENDENT LIVING / ESTRELLA The Estrella site is a site in the heart of the Village’s Downtown and close to other potential development sites. It provides the opportunity to create housing with assisted living for adults and people with special needs. AFRICAN AMERICA N MUSEUM HEALTH AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES HUB Master Developoment Sites Vacant / Underutilized Strategic Sites Legend: Strategic Sites With Buildings Strategic Sites Owned by Master Developer N O 10 / INNOVATION DISTRICT Site 10, the Village of Hempstead Innovation District, is a larger strategic overlay zone, which is intended to link downtown with the industrial area along Peninsula Avenue. The innovation district would both promote physical linkages between downtown and Peninsula Avenue, as well as create economic linkages, through the creation of new light and high-tech manufacturing spaces and expanding economic opportunities for Village residents in these white collar, technology jobs. The innovation district program could be anchored with an incubator and educational center, providing space for apprenticeships and educational programming, supported by local educational institutions. Further physical linkages will expand downtown Hempstead and better connect downtown retail, restaurants, and other commercial services to the large daytime worker population found within the industrial district. INNOVATION DISTRICT Vacant / Underutilized Strategic Sites Strategic Sites With Buildings Legend: This document was prepared for the Village of Hempstead Community Development Agency and the New York State Department of State, with state funds provided through the Brownfield Opportunity Areas Program. prepared for: Village of Hempstead Community Development Agency 50 Clinton Street, Suite 504 Hempstead, NY 11550 prepared by: AKRF, Inc. 1695 Church Street Holbrook, NY, 11741 in association with Sharon Mullon Consulting 141 Hewlett Avenue, East Patchogue, NY 11772 Metropolitan Urban Design Workshop (MUD) 240 Kent Avenue, Suite B-7C, Brooklyn, NY, 11249 Boomi Environmental LLC 603-A Omni Drive, Hillsborough, NJ, 08844 Endnotes 1 Step 2: Nomination of the BOA Program “provides an in-depth and thorough description and analysis, including a market trends analysis, an analysis of existing conditions, opportunities, and reuse potential for properties located within the BOA with an emphasis on the iden- tification and reuse potential of strategic brownfield sites (“Strategic Sites”) that may be catalysts for revitalization” (NYSDOS) 2 https://www.dos.ny.gov/opd/programs/brownFieldOpp/index.html 3 https://www.areadevelopment.com/siteSelection/nov08/brown- field-sites-environmental-contamination.shtml 4 Ibid. 5 Ibid. 6 Brownfield Redevelopment Tax Credits are available to help offset the cost of remediation and encourage private sector redevelopment of brownfield properties enrolled in the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Brownfield Cleanup Program (BCP). http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/8450.html 7 In order to further encourage cleanup and redevelopment of sites in designated BOAs in a manner consistent with the com- munity’s vision for revitalization, a “BOA bump-up,” an increase of up to 5% of the allowable tangible property tax credit compo- nent of the brownfield redevelopment tax credit, may be available for any project on a site enrolled in the BCP that: 1) Is located within a BOA that has been designated by the Secretary of State or 2) Receives a determination from the Secretary of State that the proposed development conforms to the vision, goals, and pri- orities established for revitalization of the area in the approved BOA Nomination or Plan. 8 https://esd.ny.gov/opportunity-zones 1 Ashley Ley, AICP 1 North Broadway Corridor Rezoning 2 Rezoning Area Existing Zoning District Boundaries 3 4 Existing Conditions Map #Tax Lot Owner Gross Site Area (acres) Gross Site Area (SF) Existing Zoning Existing Building Footprint (SF) Existing Building Coverage (%) Gross Floor Area (per Tax Assessor)Existing FAR 1 2.50-16-1.2 Rubenzahl, Stanley 4.02 175,111 1F-40 15,746 8.99%20,962 0.12 2 2.20-5-5 KEF Holdings LLC 8.1 350,907 1F-40 12,669 3.59%36,585 0.10 3 2.20-5-4 Irvington Equities LLC 1.01 43,996 1F-40 4,544 10.33%11,462 0.26 4 2.20-5-3 Holy Spirit Association 1.17 50,965 1F-40 3,239 6.36%3,456 0.07 5 2.30-6-15.1 Holy Spirit Association 17.67 769,705 1F-40 20,505 2.66%48,107 0.06 6 2.60-25-8 Abbott House 16.91 736,600 1F-40 38,543 5.23%100,574 0.14 Notes:Tax Lot 2.50-16-1.1 was excluded from the study area. This property contains an existing single-family residence and is substantially undersized for the 1F-40 District. This property is proposed to be re-zoned to 1F-20, as it was previously. 5 •New “Mixed-Use Corridor” Zoning District •New uses that reflect Comprehensive Plan recommendations: •Multi-family & townhomes •Assisted living •Hotels •Office •Research & Design •Full service restaurants •Places of worship •Membership clubs •Bed & Breakfasts •Small Practice Medical Office •All uses would be Special Permit Uses Proposed Zoning Highlights 6 •Builds on existing resource protection measures in Zoning Code: •All residential development would be required to prepare a resource protection analysis per Article 25. •Building coverage for all development would be based on “net buildable site area” per Article 25. •Maximum Building coverage: 20% •Maximum Lot Coverage: 25% •Maximum FAR: 0.25 •Minimum 125-foot setback from Broadway for 2-stories, 250-foot setback for 3-stories. •Includes design regulations and flexible parking regulations. Proposed Zoning Highlights 7 FAR =Gross Floor Area (GFA) Lot Area GFA includes the horizontal floor area of all floors in a building, including portions of attics and basement that are designed for and suitable as a living space. Lot area measured from property line to property line. GFA measured from exterior faces of building 8 9 Potential Build-Out Under Existing Zoning Map #Tax Lot Allowable Building Coverage for Institution (15% Lot Area) Allowable GFA for Institution* (Footprint x Height) Allowable Footprint for Residential Uses Allowable GFA for Residential Uses (Footprint x Height) Potential FAR for Residential Uses 1 2.50-16-1.2 26,267 78,800 10,026 30,079 0.17 2 2.20-5-5 52,925 158,776 10,193 30,579 0.09 3 2.20-5-4 6,599 19,798 4,960 14,879 0.34 4 2.20-5-3 7,645 22,934 4,867 14,600 0.29 5 2.30-6-15.1 115,456 346,367 20,876 62,629 0.08 6 2.60-25-8 110,490 331,470 24,290 72,870 0.10 Notes:* The allowable GFA for institution is equivalent to an FAR of 0.45. This hypothetical math exercise is for informational purposes only. These numbers do not account for units or building floor area lost due to site and engineering constraints, corridors, utilities, and parking. 10 Potential Build-Out Under Proposed Zoning Map #Tax Lot Maximum Gross Floor Area (FAR 0.25) Leasable Floor Area Estimate* Net Buildable Site Area (Article XV, Resource Protection) Maximum Building Coverage (20%) Maximum Lot Coverage (25%) Potential Number of Hotel Rooms (325 SF)** Potential Number of Assisted Living Units (850 SF)** Potential Number of Skilled Nursing or Memory Care Units (350 SF)** Potential Number of Multi-Family Conversion Units (675 SF)** 1 2.50-16-1.2 43,778 37,211 170,661 34,132 42,665 114 44 106 26 2 2.20-5-5 88,209 74,568 174,826 34,965 43,707 150***88 150***46 3 2.20-5-4 10,999 9,349 43,996 8,799 10,999 NA NA NA 17 4 2.20-5-3 12,741 10,830 41,665 8,333 10,416 NA NA NA 5 5 2.30-6-15.1 192,426 163,562 441,905 88,381 110,476 150***150***150***61 6 2.60-25-8 184,150 156,527 527,250 105,450 131,812 150***150***150***127 Notes:* Estimate assumes 15% loss of Gross Floor Area to community space, corridors, and utilities. ** Unit count represents Leasable Floor Area / Average Unit SF. Hotel, assisted living, and skilled nursing/memory care unit sizes based on industry trends. This hypothetical math exercise is for informational purposes only. These numbers do not account for units lost due to site and engineering constraints. ***Total would be capped at 150 per proposed zoning. NA -Property does not meet minimum lot size requirement (4 acres). 11 Example A: 1 Additional Building Per Lot 12 Example B: 1 to 2 Additional Buildings Per Lot 13 Example B: Southbound Bird’s Eye View 5b 5a 6 2 4 1 14 Example B: East Bird’s Eye View 5a (5b behind)4 2 6 1 15 Example B: Northbound Bird’s Eye View 1 4 2 5a 5b 6 16 Example C: All New Construction –1 Building Per Lot 17 Example D: Southbound Bird’s Eye View 5 6 4 2 3 1 18 Example D: East Bird’s Eye View 3 4 5 2 6 1 19 Example D: Northbound Bird’s Eye View 3 4 2 1 5 6 20 Example D: All New Construction –Multiple Buildings Per Lot 21 Example D: Southbound Bird’s Eye View 6c 6b 6a5c 5b 5d 5a 2b 2a 1a 1b 4 22 Example D: East Bird’s Eye View 6c 6a 6b5d 2b 2a 1a 1b4 5b 5c 5a 23 Example D: Northbound Bird’s Eye View 6c 6a 6b5d 5a, 5b, 5c 2b 2a 1a 1b 4 4. PROJECT BUDGET 4. PROJECT BUDGET Table 1 includes a detailed outline of AKRF’s proposed cost for completing the scope of work. This includes material costs and a not to exceed figure as well as all other costs that may be incurred for the delivery of services requested. Table 2 includes key assump- tions made in the development of the cost estimates provided in Table 1. AKRF’s current billing rates by title are shown in Table 3. Table 1: Budget Estimates s by Scope Task Scope Task Proposed Not-to-exceed Fee A. Review Southold Town Comprehensive Plan $5,600 B. Existing Zoning Code Assessment $16,000 C. Research and provide a menu of options for zoning and successful examples $16,000 D. Provide visual tools including 3d models $12,000 E. Conduct screening-level environmental impact assessments $18,000 F. Public involvement $48,000 G. Draft Code Update $32,000 H. Review Zoning Map and recommend updates with conceptual graphics $14,400 I. Meetings with Town officials and/or staff $16,800 J. Town Review/Finalizing Deliverables $16,000 Expenses (e.g., travel, printing)$5,000 Total $199,800 Notes: Out of pocket expenses will be billed at 1.00 times actual cost. 03Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold Table 2: Key Assumptions to the Cost Estimate Task (C) AKRF will research and provide a menu of options for zoning, including successful examples from up to three (3) other places, which may not all be on Long Island. Task (D) Visual tools will include existing and proposed zoning figures and 3D modeling for proposed building envelopes in the context of adjoining uses and the built form. Costs assume AKRF will prepare up to two (2) 3D models/simulations and four (4) pairs of zoning figures (existing and proposed). Model simulations may be used as representative of similar conditions throughout the Town; costs do not assume modeling for every location where changes to visual/bulk conditions resulting from proposed zoning changes could occur. Task (E) AKRF will conduct a screening-level assessment of potential impacts of new zoning options on traffic, community char- acter and quality of life, and up to three (3) additional technical areas agreed upon with the Town of Southold, to assess potential impacts on the environment. Task (F) AKRF will develop and maintain a project website (linked to the Town website) that will provide an online portal for gath- ering public input and to provide all relevant information under review & discussion and be updated monthly; AKRF will provide up to two (2) public meeting presentations including maps and graphics to the Town for Channel 22. Public progress reports will be quarterly. AKRF proposes up to six (6) public meetings or charrettes and up to five (5) stakeholder interviews (phone calls or virtual meetings) or online focus group sessions to discuss particular topics. This scope does not include preparing for or attending public hearings on specific proposals for Zoning Code and Zoning Map changes. If such hearings are required, a separate scope and fee will be determined at that time. This scope assumes that the Town will secure all meeting venues. This scope assumes that meeting notices will be placed on the Town (and/or Project) website and will be advertised in a newspaper of local circulation, and that the two rounds of meetings will be advertised in the newspapers, with each set of meetings advertised at one time in one notice. Task (G) This scope includes updating the Resort Residential Zoning District but does not include other zoning updates not specifi- cally mentioned in the scope of work. Task (H) This scope includes creating figures to show proposed map changes but does not include updating the Town’s official zoning map in GIS. Once the proposed changes are finalized, AKRF will submit a separate scope and fee to update the Town’s zoning map. Task (I) This scope includes up to six (6) meetings with the Town, including no more than two (2) in-person meetings. We also propose bi-weekly conference calls, as needed and only if requested by the Town or the consultant at least one day prior to the scheduled call. Task (J) Deliverables include: 1) Menu of options for new zoning; 2) Two (2) PowerPoint presentations; 3) up to six (6) maps, visual aids, and other educational materials for public information as described in the scope of work; 4) Updated zoning code (Up to two drafts of any one section); and 5) Conceptual proposed zoning map markups/figures (Up to two drafts, including a final draft for presentation to the public). This scope does not include an updated zoning map for public hearing; AKRF will provide a separate scope and fee for updating the Town’s official zoning map once the proposed changes are finalized. AKRF will respond to up to two (2) rounds of comments from the Town on deliverables. Any additional rounds of revisions to address Town comments will be billed at our hourly rates shown in Table 3 Southold Town Zoning Update Town of Southold04 Table 3 - AKRF Hourly Rate Schedule Employee Category Hourly Rate Senior Officer $280 Officer $225 Senior Technical Director $220 Technical Director $205 Senior Professional $185 Professional II $150 Professional I $140 Technical II $130 Technical I $105 These rates are in effect through December 31, 2022.