Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-251 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK WETLANDS PERMIT This Wetlands Permit No .... ,2..5..1. ........... has been granted by the Town Trustees according to information furnished in Application No...3..1...6. ...... ~ ..... filed by Applicant ....~..a...:L.~..e..zT...~p.9~s .......... ........................................ on ....A..~..cj:.:.....1..4..~ ......... 19.....8..6... A map of the proposed work will be kept on file in the Trustee Office under the application number given. Permit granted to do the following work .... ~.'~..~?:~'e~C.~'~.~..s'~.~..~'~'q~4.'5~]~.~.~.;j~IT~.~.b~.~-~h~.~d ..... ..i.i.....h..:w t in ........... 18'j ................................................. and to reconstruct, in: ......... kind[ .................. and in: ............................. ~..lace 70 lmn.[ ............. ft, ............. of return on' the west side of said prop. ertl,. ' ................. Location of property on which work to be done Bayshore Road, Greenp. ort. Creek, Bay or Harbor fronting property ...~..e..c...o..z}..i...c...~..a.~. .................... : .............................................. Size of Work: Length .ii...4..5...f..t..:....a...n.'d'....7.'O'.f..'t'.: ..................................................................................... ..... ............. .' ...... ' ............ · ..................................... Width 8 and zn t~.lace ............................................ Height Above High Water ...... .4...~..t..; .............................................................................. Depth Below Low Water .......... .~.../..a.. ............................................................................... Yards to be Excavated .............. .z}/...a. ................................................................................ Yards to be Filled .................. .z}./...a. ................................................................................ · Manner in which material is to be removed or deposited ..... .~./..,a. ............................................................. Intended use of property ....... _p,[,i,,y,,a.,,t..e....,r,,e,,s...i..d,,.e.,q.t,..i.,a..1,. .................................................................... " Conditions if any ......n./...a. ................................................................................................. i .... ~ .................. Expiration D at e ,D,. ,e, .c,.e.,~.b,.e...~,....2..6./.'....Z..,9..8, .6.....i,,.~...,¥ '°'X..]¢,. · hA ~...q~'~... ~,q~ ~q.~.~..b,~..~A ~A..~A~ D - Number of Inspections Required .2.:7.?..~.g..s`.t...e..e~..s...A~...t~p...b~.~.i~t~£~£P`~d..`~D~.`.~.Q~.~¢~.~ o£ the work. Inspection Fees ....~..5......0..0....~..a..~...~.e...c..e..i..~.%...~.~, .... ;3.Q~3.8.2 ................................................................ · Liability Policies in the Amount of ......................................................................................................... The validity of this permit is or may be subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal .authorities. The Town accepts no responsibility in applying for or obtaining such approval. In the 'event that such approval is necessary, the holder of this permit shall not commence operations here- under until such approval has been obtained in writing. The failure to obtain such other approval when required shall subject this permit to immediate revocation by the Trustees upon receipt by the Trustees. of written notice from such other governmental or municipal authorities of its refusal or disapproval. The applicant does by the acceptance of this permit, assume all responsibility for operations under- taken pursuant to this permit, and shall take all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property resulting from such operations. By such acceptance, the applicant also agrees to [ndemni- - fy and save harmless the Town, and its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims arising from operations under this permit and any and all acts or omissions of applicant, his agent and employees. The applicant and the owner and occupants of the premises upon which the operations authorized by this. permit are being conducted, do, by the acceptance of this permit, give consent to the Town, and its officers and employees to enter upon the premises where such operations are being conducted To make such inspections as the Town may deem necessary to insure that such operations are being con- ducted in conformity with this permit. Thi& op6ration will not substantially: A. Adversely affect the wetlands of the town. B. Cause damage from erosion, turbidity or siltation. Cause saltwater intrusion into the fresh water resources of the town. D. Adversely affect fish, shellfish or other beneficial marine organisms, aquatic wildlife and vege- tation or the natural habitat thereof. E. 'Increase the danger of flood and storm-tide damage. F, Adversely affect navigation on tidal waters or the tidal flow of the tidal waters of the town. G. Change the course of any channel or the natural movement or flow of any waters. H. Weaken or undermine the lateral support of other lands in the vicinity. 1, Otherwise adversely affect the health, safety a,nd general welfare of the people of the town. BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southo!d, New York 11971 January 6., 1986 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Glenn E. Just Land Use Company Route 25 A Box 2521 Wading River, New York 11792 Dear Mr. Just: Transmitted herewith is the action taken by the Board of Trustees at a regular meeting held on December 26, 1985 regard, ing wetland application no. 316. Moved by Trustee Bredemeyer seconded by Trustee Kujawski WHEREAS the Land Use Cqmpany on behalf of Walter Wappus applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated August 14, 1985 and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and. recommendations and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on December 26, 1985 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area; and WHEREAS, the Board considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and it is noted for the record that there has been no public opposition; and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the Town, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Land Use Company,.on behalf of Walter Wappus be granted permission under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, New York, all in accordance with the application. This permit will expire on December 26, 1986 if work has not commenced by said date. There shall be two inspections required; and the Trustees shall be notified when the project is complete. TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 SOUTItOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL The Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held its regular meeting on Tuesday, November 26, 1985 at 8:00 P.M., at the Southold Town Hal!, Main Road, Southold, New York. Present were' Also present were: Martin H. Garrell - Chairman John Tuthill - Member Ralph Condit - Member John Holzapfel - Member Heather Cusack - Member Jeanne Marriner - Member Betty Wells - Member Linda J. Cooper - Secretary * , * Mr. Bergman Henry Smith DISCUSSIONS- Mr. Bergman (Planning Board referral - Proposed Subdivision) appeared before the Council to explain the exact location of the proposed house in relation to the slope and marsh area. At the Council's request, Henry Smith was in attendance to answer the questions raised au the previous meeting regarding his Wetland Application No. 313. Regarding the amount of dredging To take place, Mr Smith informed the Council that the application had been amended from the original 1000 c.y. of dredging to 96 c.y. When questioned about the placement-of dredge spoils, he explained the dredge spoils would be loaded on a barge and unloaded at Goldsmith's, then trucked away'. The Council also wished to know if there had been any dredging. done in the same area in the historic past. According to Mr. Smith, the Counvy had dredged in the area up To the park au the end of Youngs Avenue. REPORTS: Heather Cusack, the Council's STOP representative reportgd the program for 1986 would begin organizing in February and s~ar~ getting information out to the public with special attention being given To businesses. Ms. Cusack also reported 'on a request received from Councilman Paul Stoutenburgh. Councilman Stoutenburgh would like the CAC to Page 2 make up a map showing all the places in the area with drainage pipes going into creeks. It Would help pinpoint sensitive areas. The Council felt that it was a worthwhile project. Council Chairma~ Martin Garre!l will contact Paul Stoutenburgh to set up organizing and financing the project. The members of the Council thought it would be best to hire someone, possibly a college student, to do the actual leg work. Chairman Martin Garrell reported that he is planning a joint meeting .for a Saturday, sometime in January of February, between the Southold, East Hampton, Southampton, and possibly Riverhead CACs and Conservation Boards. RECOMMENDATIONS: On a motion made by John Tuthill, seconded by Ralph Condit it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Planning Board.approval of the Proposed SUb'division 'of Martin and Barbara Bergman. The Council approves with the stipulation that care be used during excavation and that the natural vegetation be kept as a buffer between the house and marsh area to avoid run-off. Vote o£ Council: Motion carried. Ayes: Ail On a motion made by John Holzapfel, seconded by John Tuthill it was RESOLVED to recommend to the South.old Town Trustees approval of the Wetland Applica'ti'on No. '3'10 submitted by Eh-Consultants, Inc. on behalf o£ Neil'Simon._ Applicant wished to construct a variable width timber walkway for house now under construction to bulkhead (approx- imately 40') where it will be continous with_ a 4' wide x 20' long fixed elevated (min. 3.5' above grade of marsh) walk, 4' x 14' hinged ramp, and 6' x 16' float secured by two 8" diameter pilings. The Council' approves with the stipul'ation that the dock be shortened to keep it out of the main channel. Harbor Lights Drive, Southold. Vote of Council: Motion carried. Ayes: Ail On a motion made by Martin H. Garrell, seconded by John Tuthill it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees' approval of the Wetland Application sUbmitted by The Land Use Co.,- on behalf of Henry P. Smith ( No: 313) to dredge a 96 c~y'. area, in TOwn Creek. Hobart Road, Southold. Vote of Council! Motion carried. Ayes: Ail On a'motion made by Mart4n Garrell, seconded by Ralph Condit ft was RESOLVED to table Wetland Application No. 315 to reinspect by the Council. Vote of Council> Motion Carried Ayes: Ail ~. Page 3 On a motion made by Jeanne Marriner, seconded by Ralph Condit it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of the Wetland Application No. 316 submitted by The Land Use Company on behalf of Walter Wappus to reconstruct 45' of bayside timber bulkhead within 18' and reconstruct in kind and in place 33' of timber bulkhead on west side of property. Bayshore Road, Greenport. Vote of Council: Motion carried. Ayes' Ail On a motion made by Martin Garrell, seconded by John Tuthill it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of the ' Wetland Application No. 317 submitted - Charlie Caraftis (Mattituck Fishing Station) by the North Fork Marine Construction, Inc. to construct a timber bulkhead, 106' long. Bulkhead will be built 18" in front of existing bulkhead. Fill will be trucked in to backfill bulkhead. Naugles Drive, Mattituck. Vote of Council' Motion carried. Ayes: All. On a motion made by made by Jeanne'Marriner, seconded by Martin Garrell it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees' approval of the Wetland Application No. 318 submitted.by The Biexedon Estate Property Owners to maintenance dredge inlet to Petty~s Pond. Approximately 6500 c.y. of spoil will be deposited on beach to westas beach nourish- ment. Ten-year maintenance dredging permit is requested. Ashamonaque Avenue, Southold Vote of Council' Motion carried. Ayes' Ail On a motion made by Martin Garrell., seconded by Heather Cusack it was RESOLVED to table Wetland Appli'cation No. 319 submitted by Mr. Ted Dowd. The Council wishes to meet with Mr. Dowd. Vote off Council' Ayes: Ail Motion carried. ' On a motion made by Jeanne Marriner, seconded by John Holzapfel it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of the Wetland Application No. 3'20 submitted by The Land Use Company on behalf of the Mattituck Park COmmission to reconstruct a timber jetty. Peconic Bay Boulevard, Mattituck. ~ Vote Of Council' Motion carried. Ayes- Ail On a motion made by. Jeanne Marriner, seconded by John'HolZapfel it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of the Page 4 Wetland Application No. 321 submitted by the Land Use Company on behalf o£ the Mattituck Park Commission to reconstruct two timber jetties. Bay Avenue, Veterans Memorial Park, Mattituck. Vote of Council: Motion carried. Ayes: Ail On a motion made by Martin Garrell, seconded by Heather Cusack it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval,subject to the same stipulations as on the DEC permit, of the Wetland Application No. 322 submitted by Daysman Morris to bring in 200 c.y. of fill to be placed on lot to run grade to level of road in area 150'x75' Kerwin Boulevard, Greenport. Vote of Council: Motion carried. Ayes: Ail On a motion made by Ralph Condit, seconded by John Tuthill it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town trustees approval of the Wetland Appli. cati'on No. 323 submitted by The Lagoon Association to replace 50T S. jetty; repair existing S. jetty, remove up to 215' of S. Bulkhead and grade to natural beach; extend existing jetty 75' shoreward in sandy beach; pass over 600 c.y. of littoral sand from S. to N. and create a deposition basin, including maintenance of deposition basin and inlet dredging. Vote of Council: Motion carried. Ayes: Ail On a motion made by Ralph Condit, seconded by Jeanne Marriner it was RESOLVED to recommind to the Southold Town Trustees approval of the Wetland Application No. 3'24 submitted by The Land Use Company on behalf of Arthur J. Bujnowski to construct a timber jetty of approximately 35' .in length. The compartment between the proposed structure and the one to the east shall be completely filled with clean sand. 1365 Watersedge WAy, Southold. Vote of Council: Ayes: Ail Motion carried. on a motion made by Ralph Condit, seconded by John Tuthill it was RESOLVED to approvethe minutes of the meeting held October 22, 1985. Vote of Council: Motion carried. 'NEW BUSINESS: Ayes: Ail The next regular meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council will was scheduled for Thursday, December 19, 1985 at 8~:00 P.M. at the Southold Town Hall. Page 5 GrOup inspections will be made on Thursday, December 19, 1985. The group will meet ~at Southold Town Hall at 1-00 P.M. The new'applications: were distributed as follows: No 325 - Ralph Condit No 326 - Group Inspection No 327 - Jeanne Martinet No 328 - Ralph Condit and Betty Wells No 329 - John Tuthill No 330 - Group Inspection No 331 - Berry Wells No. 332 - Group Inspection No. 333 - John Holzap£el No. 335 - Group Inspection No. 336 - Group Inspection The Council would like it placed on the record, that due to the large amount o£ group inspections scheduled for this meeting, it was neccessary to schedule two days for the group inspections. On a motion made by Ralph Condit, seconded by John Holzapfel it was RESOLVED to adjourn the meeting az 9'30 P.M. Vote of Council' Motion carried. Ayes · All Respectfully submitted, Linda J. Cooper, Secretary · _~-~--~ //O mOtion made by Jeanne Marriner, seconded b.y Ralph Cond_it it w~ag~ ..R, ESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of the Wetland Application No. 316 submitted by The Land Usry on behalf of Walter Wappus to ~reconstruct 45' of bayside timber bulkhead within 18' and reconstruct in kind and in place timber bulkhead on west Side of property. Bayshore Road, Greenport. __~ of Council: Ayes: All ~ Mot~ied. On a motion made by Martin Garrell, seconded by John Tuthill it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of the " Wetland Application No. 317 submitted - Charlie Caraftis (Mattituck Fishing Station) by the North Fork Marine Construction, Inc. to construct a timber bulkhead, 106' long. BuIkhead will be built 18" in front of existing bulkhead. Fill will be trucked in to backfill bulkhead. Naugles Drive, Mattituck. Vote of Council' Motion carried. Ayes: All. On a motion made by made by Jeanne'Marriner, seconded by Martin Garrell it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees' approval of the Wetland APplicatio'n No.' 318 submitted.by The Biexedon Estate Property Owners to maintenance dredge inlet to Petty"s Pond. Approximately 6500 c.y. of spoil will be deposited on beach to westas beach nourish- ment. Ten-year maintenance dredging permit is requested. Ashamonaque Avenue, Southold .Vote of Council- Motion carried. Ayes- Ail On a motion made by Martin Garrell., seconded by Heather Cusack it was RESOLVED to table Wetland A'ppli'cati'on No 319 submitted by Mr. Ted Dowd. The Council wishes to meet with Mr. Dowd. Vote of Council' Motion carried. Ayes · Ail On a motion made by Jeanne Marriner, seconded by John Holzapfel it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of the Wetland Application' No. 320 submitted by The Land Use Company on behalf of the Mattituck Park Commission to reconstruct a timber jetty. Peconic Bay Boulevard, Mattituck. Vote Of Council- Motion carried. Ayes' Ail On a motion made by. Jeanne Marriner, seconded by John 'Holzapfel it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approv~] of the Page 4 Wetland Application No. 321 submitted by the Land Use Company on behalf of the Mattituck Park Commission to reconstruct two timber jetties. Bay Avenue, Veterans Memorial Park, Mattituck. Vote of Council: Motion carried. Ayes: All On a motion made by Martin Garrell, seconded by Heather Cusack it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval,subject to the same stipUlations as on the DEC permit, of the Wetland Application No. 322 submitted by Daysman Morris to bring in 200 c.y. of fill to be placed on lot to run grade to level of road in area 150'x75' Kerwin Boulevard, Greenport. Vote of Council: Motion carried. Ayes: Ail On a motion made by Ralph Condit, seconded by John Tuthill it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town trustees approval of the Wetland Application No. 323 submitted by The Lagoon Association to replace 50' S. jetty; repair existing S. jetty, remove up to 215' of S. Bulkhead and grade to natural beach; extend existing jetty shoreward in sandy beach; pass over 600 c.y. o£ littoral sand from S. to N. and create a deposition basin, including maintenance of deposition basin and inlet dredging. Vote of Council: Motion carried. Ayes: All On a motion made by Ralph Condit, seconded by Jeanne Marriner it was RESOLVED to recommind to the Southold Town Trustees approval of the Wetland Application No. 3'24 submitted by The Land Use Company on behalf of Arthur J. Bujnowski to construct a timber jetty of approximately 35' .in length. The compartment between the proposed structure and the one to the east shall be completely filled with clean sand. 1365 Watersedge WAy, Southold. Vote of Council: Motion carried. Ayes: Ail on a motion made by Ralph Condit, seconded by John Tuthill it was RESOLVED to approvethe minutes of the meeting held October 22, 1985. Vote of Council: Motion carried. Ayes: All NEW BUSINESS: The next regular meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council will was scheduled ifor Thursday, December. 19, 1985 at 8:00 P.M. at the' Southotd Town Hall. Page 5 GrOup inspections will be made on Thursday-, December 19, 1985. The group will meet ,at S°uthold Town Hall at Z-00 P.M. The new'applications were distributed as follows' No No No No No No No 325 - Ralph Condit 326 -Group Inspection 327 - Jeanne Marriner 328 - Ralph Condit and Betty Wells 329 - John Tuthill 330 - Group Inspection 331 - Betty Wells No. 332 - Group Inspection No. 333 - John Holzapfel No. 335 - Group Inspection No. 336 - Group Inspection The Council 'would like it placed on the record, that due to the large amount of group inspections scheduled for this meeting, it was neccessary to schedule two days for the group inspections. On a motion made by Ralph Condit, seconded by John Holzapfel it was RESOLVED ,to adjourn the meeting at 9'30 P.M. Vote of Council- Motion carried. Ayes · All Respectfully submitted, Linda J. Cooper, Secretary TELEPHONE t516) 765-1801 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL November 27, 1985 To: Southold Town Trustees From: CAC Secretary, Linda Cooper The CAC held its regular meeting, Tuesday, November 26, 1985. At that time the following recommendations were made: Wetland Application No. 310 - Neil Simon - Recommend approval with the stipulation that the dock be shortened to keep it out of the main channel Wetland Application No. 313 - Henry P. Smith - Recommend approval Wetland Application No. 315 - North ~ork Property Development - ~ Wetland ApplicaLion No. 316 - Walter Wappus - Recommend approva~ W~e~~~kp43Zki~17 - Charlie Caraftis (Mattituck Fishing Station) - Recommend approval - Wetland Application No. 318 - The Beixedon Estate Property Owners, c/o John Nickles - Recommend approval Wetland Application No. 319 - ~r. Ted Dowd -'T~bl'ed, the Council-" wishes to meet with Mr. Dowd. Wetland Application No. 320 - Mattituck Park Comm. (park at Peconic Bay Blvd.) - Recommend approval 'Wetland Application No. 321 - Mattituck Park Commission (Veterans Memorial Park) - Recommend approval Wevland Application No. 322 - Daysman Morris - Recommend approval as long as the conditions stipulated in the DEC Permit as strictly followed Wetland Application No. 323 - The Lagoon AssociatiOn~ c/o Rober~ H. Sturdy - Recommend approval " Wetland Application No. 324 - Arthur J. Bujnowski - Recommend ~pproval BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE LAWS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 32 OF THE CODES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. APPLICATION NO.~f.~Z DATE OF APPLICATION August 14, 1985 (301)-774-7888 IDENTITY OF APPLICANT Walter Wapus PHONE NO ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Bayshore Rd., Greenport TAX MAP NO. (516)-929-3575 AGENT Glenn E. Just of the Land Use Company PHONE NO. LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR WHICH PERMIT WANTED Bayshore Road at Arshamomague, .Greenport HOME ADDRESS OF PERMIT APPLICANT IF DIFFERENT FROM AFORESAID LOCATION 17729 Tree Lawn Drive, Ashton, Maryland, 20861 CREEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTYPec°nic Bay SIZE OF PROPOSED WORK 33' and 55' LENGTH 33' and 45' 18" WIDTH 4~ HEIGHT ABOVE HIGH WATER DEPTH BELOW LOW WATER YARDS TO BE EXCAVATED YARDS TO BE FILLED 0 0 0 2 miles WIDTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY DEPTH AT LOW. TIDE AVERAGE RISE IN TIDE DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL 100 FT. DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN THE AREA 0 FT. IS THIS FOR PRIVATE OR BUSINESS USE? .p~ivate residential AREA ZONING MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED INTENDED use OF PROPERTY private residence DESCRIBE ANY KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISE~a AND WHETHER ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMITS HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO ERRECT STRUCTURES OR TO DREDGE OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES AND WHETHER ANY PERMITS OR LICENSES WERE EVER SUSPENDED OR REVOKED BY A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY none DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION AND PROPOSED CONDITION OF THE PREMISES AFTER THE WORK IS COMPLETED INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF THE PROJECT SITE IF NECESSARY none WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF 'THE PROPERTY, IF NOT THE SAME AS THE APPLICANT. enclosed BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEEi TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Project Information (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1._ Applican~sponsor 12. Project Name Walter Wapus by Glenn E. Just of tRe Land Use Co. 3. Project Iocat,on:. /~ '?~'~ CountV Municipality Greenpor: Suffolk 4. Is proposed act,on: [] New [] Expansion r~ Modification/alteration 5. Describe project briefly: Applicant proposes to reconstruct 45' of bayside timber bulkhead within 18". Also to reconstruct in kind and in place 33' of timber bulkhead on west side of said property Precise location [road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc. or provide map) Bayshore Rd., Greenport · 1. ^moun, of land afte,~ted: Initiallyy3 acres Ultimately acres 8. Will proposed acuon comply with ex,sting zoning or oUler existing land use restrictions! [] Yes [] No If No. describe briefly 9. W'hat is p~ese~t land use in vlc,n,ty of prolect~ [] Resident,al [] Industrial [] Commercial Describe: [] Agriculture [] Parkland/op;n space [] Other Does action involve a perm~Uapproval0 ot funding, now or ultimately, from any other governmental agency (Federal, state or Iocat)t [] Yes [] No If yes, list agenc~s) and permi~approvals N.Y.S.D.E.C. -pending U.S.D.O.A. - pending 11. Does any aspect of the acuon have a currently valid permit or approvalt [] Yes r~ No If yes. list agency name and permi~Japproval type 12. As result of proposed action will existing permitJapptoval requi~e modificationf []Ye, [~No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name; Walter Wapus by Glenn. E. Land Use Company Just of the Date: 8-14-85 PART LI Environmental Assessment CTo be completed by Agencyj A. Does action exceed any Type ,'shotd in 6 NYCRR. Part 617.12! 11 yes, coordinate the ~_,lew process and use the FULL/LONG FORM EAF. [] Yes [] No R. Will action receive coordinated review as provided for Unlisted Actions in 6 NYCRR, Part 617.7~ If No, a negative declaration may be supercecled by another involved action. C, Could action result in ANY adverse eflects on. to, or arising from the following: (Answer's may be handwritten, if legible] C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing t~affic patterns. ~olid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion. drainage or flooding problems/ Explain briefly: C2. Historic, archeological, visual or aesthetic, or other natural or cultural resources; agricultural districu; or community or neighborhood charactert Explain briefl C3. Vegetation or fauna, movement of fish or wildlife species, significant habitau, or threatened or endangered species! Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources! Explain brieUy. CS. Crowth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Secondary. cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-C6i' Explain briefly. C7. A change in use of either quantiW or type of energy? Explain briefly. PART Ill Determination of Significance (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to sho;,v 'that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if You have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL/LONC FOgh4 EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide here, and on attachments as necessary, the reasons supportng this determination: Agency Name Agency Preparer'$ Name Prepa~e~'~ St~ndlure~l'dJe , ,, Date COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORK )SS: BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS, AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THAT THE WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRusTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT° IF GRANTED. B, .X ruRE oF/ P ^.T SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS NOTARY PUBLIC CHARLES W. i~OWMAN NOTARY PUGLIC, Stote of New York No. 4668958, Suffolk County ~,ommission Expirm, March 30, [~.~.~ EXAMINED APPROVED "WETLANDS" PERMIT (CHAPTER 97) APPROVED "BOAT,DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) DISAPPROVED "WETLANDS PERMIT" (CHAPTE~ 97) DISAPPROVED "BOATS,DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) CONDITIONS, IF ANY E~AMINING BODY SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 APRIL 23, 1985 LAND USE COMPANY P.O. BOX 361 WADING RIVER, N.Y. 11792 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN : I AUTHORIZE THE LAND USE COMPANY TO ACT AS MY AGENT IN SECURING ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A BULKHEAD ON MY GREENPORT PROPERTY AND FOR PLACEMENT OF A RETAINING WALL ON THE ADJACENT TOWN PROPERTY. WALTER A. WAPPAUS APPENDIX A EAF ENV%RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART ! Project ]nformtlon ~TIC[: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the actton pmposed may have a significant effect on tne ehvtronment. Please complete the entire Oata Sheet, Answers to these questions w111 be considered as oa.t of the appli:ation for aoprcval and may be subject to further verification and public rmHev. Provide an. aod't~o~al ~nfor~a:~on ~o~ oelieve will be needed to complete PARTS 2 and 3. ,~ ~,;p ~e~ '~a~ .~e~,tc:,~n of the ~AF ell] be dependent on Infonaatton currently available and will not ~a,:,,! req~ ~:.~e~. rebear:e ~r ~n.e~ttqation. If Inforl~tlon requiring such d~ditiona] ~rK iS ~ivaGale, NArIE OF PROJECT: NAHE AND ADDRESS OF OWNER (If Different} (Name) ADORESS AND NAHE OF APPLICANT: (Street) Walter Wapus T~ (State] (ZIp) {ga.e) BUS~ NESS PHONE: 17729 Tree Lawn Drive Ashton, Maryland 20861 (P.0. } (State) (ZtpJ in kind and in Applicant proposes .to reconstruct 45' of baysiOe ti~bar bulkhead_ ,, A£SO ~O recons~uc~ place )~' o~ t~mber bul~ead on ~est si~e o£ said propertz (PLEASE COflPLETE EACH QUEST%ON -]ndtcate N.A. If not applicable) SITE DESCRIPTION (Physical setttng of overall project, both develoned and undeveloped treat) _ octet acres General character of the land: Generally unlfom slope X Preseot land use: U~n lnckastrtal . , CommrctaI Total acreage of OrOJKt area: ~/atcmt. Aaproxtmte acreage: Presently After Completion Meadow or Brushland acres acres Forested acres .... __acres Aqr~¢ult~ral acres acres ,et;ar: ~rethuater or T~a~l AS ~er Articles ·dntt ~s ~re~omnant so$l type{t) on qroleCt site? a. ~re t~ere D~aroc~ outcro~olnas afl qroj~ct £- ~na: ~s depth to oearoc~? Generall~ uneven and rolltng or Irregular , Sueurban ~., Rural ., Forest Hater Surface Area Unvegetated (rock, earth or fill) Roads, butldtflqs and other paved Ot~er (indicate t~e) sand ~.-_.Yes X NO Presentl~ After Cmq)letton acres __..acres _ acres ~._acres .... _icres ___.~cres , acres ~cres 9/t/78 __(!n feet) 6, Approximate 9ercen:a.ae of pr~ ,ecl orojecc site with slooes: 0-10%100 ln-i~.'"' %115: or g~ater I. ' 7. Is pro, eec cont~g~us~o or contain a buildinn or s~te l~ste~ on t~ ~attonal Register of Historic Places? ~. Yes~ ' 8. ~at is the depth to [ne ~acer t~ble? n/afoot 9. ~ n~ting or fishing op~rtunities presently exist in the project area? Yes X ~ ~s p~ject sl~ contain any species of plant or antmal life that is identified u threatened or endan~re~ - __Yes X :~o, according to - %denttfy each sp~tes 11. Are there any unique or u~usual land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological fonMtions - Yes . ~- )to. (Describe 12. Is t~ pro,oct 51to presentl~ used ~x the co~nlty or nelgn~orn~ as an open ~pace or mcreatl~ _) IS. 16. L&tLes. P~e4~, ~Klt~cI areas ~lthtn or contlg~c~s to p~Ject i~d: Peconic Bay ~t is t~ Wl~nt l~d use ~e zontag clisstftcitt~ etthtn i I/4 mile radl~ of ~ prol~t (e.g. stngle fMil~ ~si~tial, R-Z) lad ~ scale of ~veio~t (e.g. Z s~). 1. Philco1 dt~s~s ina scale of proj~t (fil1 tn d~ns~ons as app~prt~te) -' "~ ~' a. To~I coetiguous acrejge o~ned by project sponsor n/a acres. b. Project acreage Mvelo~ed: n/a acres initially; n/a acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain unMvelo~ed n/a d, Leagtl~ of project, In mtles: n/a .(if appropriate) e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate'percent of expansion proposed: age T1/a ; developed acreage n/a · f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing n/a g. Maximum Yehicular trips generated per hour n/a h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: 9ne Family T~o Famil.y Inttia) Ultimate i. If: Orientation ;)eighborhood-City-Regional building square foot- ; proposed n/a .(upon completion of project) n/a Multiple Family Condominium Estimated Employment feet. Coa~.ercial Industrial Total height of tallest nroposed structure n/a -?- 2. How much nafura) materi, .i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed f. . the ~t~'- ~ tons P cubic yards. 3. How many acres of veqetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site - P acres. 4. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project7 Yes Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? If single phase project: g. 10. 11. Anticipated Period of construction 1 a Total n~n~er of phases anticipated c. Approximate conmletlon date final phase month. . d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subsequent phases? Hill blasting occur during construction? Yes × No Number of jobs generated: during construction .4 ; after project is complete ~ . Numar of jobs eliminated by this project Will pmject require relocation of any projects or factlitfes? Yes ~es X NO months, (including d~molition), No. n/a /ear (including .year. Yes No × No. If yes, expl~tn: 12. a. Is-surface or subsurface liquid waste dlsposal involved? Yes .. X NO. b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged 13. Will surface area of existing lakesw ponds, Stre~s, bays or ostler surface waterways be Jncreese~ or oecreasea ~y proPoidl? YC& ~ ~0, 14. Is project or any portion of Project located in the 100year flood plain? Yes X No 15. a. Ooes project involve disposal of solid waste? .Yes ~ No b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disnosal facility be used? Yes ~No c.-If yes, give name: ~ location d. dill anywastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Yes 16. Will prnject use herbicides or Pesticides? Yes ~ No 17. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour Der day)? Yes X No 18. ~11 proJeCt produce operating noise exceeding the local a~n~ie~ce noise levels? YeS ~ NO 19. ,~ll project result tn an increase tn ener~ use? Yes × 'No. If yes, indicate type(s) No ~0. Z1. 22 If water supply Is from wells indicate p~lng capacity n~a Total anticipated water usage per day n/a gals/day. Zoning: a. ImaL ~s dominant zoning classification of site? ~. Current s~ecJfic zoning classification of s~te d, If no, sndicate desired Zoning gals/minute. Residential Residential yes a. Is any Federa) permit required? × ¥e$ No ~. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? c. Local and Regional approvals: Approval Required (Yes, No) (Type) ...... Yes _ × l~ Submittal (Date) Approval (Date) City, Town, Village Board City, Town, Village Planning Board City, Town, Zoning Board City, County Health Department Other local agencies Other regional agencies no State Agencies Federal Agencies yes Trustees 8/85 no no ~o' yes N.Y.S.O.~.C. 6 8--7~ · ~e l~cts ts$~lated ~t~ t~ p~sil, pl~se dtsc~ss a~h t~CtS e~ ~ m~u~s ~tch can be TITLE: _ Analvs~:/~/,,,~ REdSkin: Walter W8, D~ s ~3/14/85 -4- ~Gen. eral ]nforr. at~o~ (~ead CArefully) - ~n c~.,-~le~in~ the fo= the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my decisions beec ~e~sona~ie? The r~v~ewer is not expected co be an exper~ envirar~mental - identifying that an effect will be potentially larg~ (colu~ 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily si:~ificant. Any large effect must be evaluated in PART 3 to det~.-taine significance. By identifying an ~f~e:t in Colu~ 2 silly asks that it be looked at fur:her. - ~e Exan~les provided ar~ to ~ssist the reviewer by showing t.vp~s of effects and wherever possible the thresh~ cf ~nitu~e that ~uld trigger a response in.co)~ ~. The e~amples ar~ generally a~plicab)e throughout the State'and for a~st situations. 8ut, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds ~ay be rno~ appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. _. - Each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the exanq)les have been offered as ~ney 'do not consttt~e an e.r~hausttve list of 'impacts and thresholds to answer each question. - l'ne nu:ber of exa~nples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. Z)CSTI~UCTIO~5 {Read Carefully} ~. A~r each of the 18 questions in PART 2. Answer Ye~ if ther~ w. ill be any effect. ' b. ~.vbe answer.~ should be considered as Yes answers. c. If ensuring ~es to a auestion then check the appropriate box {~ol~ I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the i~.a:t. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check colu~ 2. If impact will occur hue threshold is lower than example, check colu~ 1. d. If revimver h~s Joubt about the size of the impact .ben..cons~der the t~act as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. '' ' e. )fa potentially la~e i~r~act or effect can be reduced by a cha~ge in the project to a less than large. r~agnitude, place a Yes in col~'~ 3. A Ho response indicates that such a reduction is not .possible, Ih?AC1 ~ LA/iD W~LL I'HERE BE AJt EFFECT A.S A P.~SULT OF A PHYSIC~J. DLUIG£ TO PR~EC-T SITE? .... Exa.,~les that Would Apply to Column · ' NO YES ®© Any construction ~ sl~.es of 15~ or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 fo~t of length), or where the general slopes in the project are~ exceed 10'.. Const~ction on Land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. ronstruction of oared oarking area for 1,?~ or more vehicles. C~nstru:tion on land where bedrock is exposed or ~enerally ~ithin 3 feet o( existing ground surface. Construction th~: ~iI1 continue for~re than 1 year or involve mare than one phase or stage. ~,. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than tons of natural ~terial {i.e. rock or soil) per year. ConstrqJctipn of any new sanitary landfill. · Co~s'.r~ction in .a designated ~loodway. 14iLL-TE--'Ki ~[ AJt EFFECT TO AtiY UltIOU£ OR UNt:SUAL LJ. NO FnR?.S FrJU.~D Ol( TliE SITE? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, .qeological tl~s, etc. ) $.~e¢iftc land forms: F0t P~E~ED? (Under-A~tcles 15, 24, 25 of ~e [nvtr- o~t~l ~nse~ation Law, E.C.L.) Exhales ~at Would Apply to ~1~ 2 D~Ein~ ~re than l~ cubic ya~s of ~teri~l, f~ ~ ch~,nel of a' p~t~cted strea~. Const~ion in a designated f~s~ater or tidal Other icgacts: ... k~LL pRCk)ECT AFFECT AltY ~OX-?ROTI~(.'~ED £X ISTIIiG OR liE}/ NOYES .DY OF ~LATER? : ................ ,.:.: ........................... E~a~les that I~ould Apply to Col~ 2 A lO: tnc~se or d~rease in the surface a~a of any body of ~'~ter or ~re than a 10 acre inc~ase or decrease. Cons~ction of a body of water that exceeds 10 ac~s of surface ama. Other l~acts: No YES S.~I,~LPROOECTA~£¢TSURFAC£ORGROUNO~TERnUALXI~? Examples,that Hould Apply ~ Col tnm 2 Pr~j~t will ~qui~ a discha~e pemit. Project requi~s use of a source of water that does not have ~ apo~val to serve p~posed proj~t. P~ject ~quires rater supply f~m wells with g~ater -- ~.~ (5 gallons per minute p~ping ~pacity. ~ C:nst~ction or operatio6 causing any contamina.tion of a pub)it water suoply system. P~ject will adversely affect g~un~ater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to - f~:ilitie$ which p~sently do not exist or have i~d~u~te capacity. P~ject requiring a facility that ~uid use water tn F .... excess Of 2~,OO0 gallpns per day. P~ject will likely cause siltation or other disease --in~ an existing b:dy of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. L~tRGr ! ~FACT C~qJ( J:mACT REJ)UC r.0 BY Pq~L)ECT CHANGE RU~OFF~ ................................................... P~ect ts likely ~ cause substantial e~ston, P~c: is ~n~a:tble ~t:h e~tsttn~ dr~na9e .p~tte~.. Ot~r t~acM: I~) yrt 7. gILL PRC~JECT AFFECT AIR QUALITY? ...................... Exz~les that ~ulg Apply ~ ~1~ 2 -_ P~jec: will induce 1,~ or ~ vehicle trips' ~n any given ~ P~ject will ~ult tn t~ incineration of ~ ~an 1 ~n of ~fuse per hour. ._ P~J~: emission rate of all c~tamtnants will exceed ~ lbs, aer hour or a heat source O~d~ing ~ than 10 million ~TU's ~r ~ur. I~. ~ILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY THREATUt~D OR E~tDANK~rR£D Exa~l ~at Would Appl~ ~ ~l~ l ~' ~duction of one or ~ ~cies listed on the lt~ or Federal list, using ~t silt, o~er or near site or fo~d on the silt. ~ Re. ual of any ~rtion of ~ critical or stantficant'wtlg- ...... I ife Apolic~tinn of PestiCide or he.icicle over ~ than Othtr lr~cts: YES ~ILL PROJECT SU~STA~'~I'ALLY AFFECT EO~-THREAT£iI£D OR EROANG£RED SPECIE. S? ............ Eza~l~ that Would Apply to Colum 2 P~ject would s~stan:ially interfere with any ~sident or migratory' fish or wildlife species· ..... P~ject reeu(rt$ the re.vt1 or.re than lq acres of · ~ture forest (over 10~ ~ears (n aec) ar other 1oca!1~ tm~rt~n: vegetation, ' ' YES 11. 13. :.'ILL T~E .~.J~CT ~KrECT VIEH~., VISTAS OR THE VIStmAL CH.:.r~tCT-C2. C~ ~.-:-'-, I:F. iGX~qRHr.~D OR CO.~.~!tlTY.? .............. Ex-~r,.nles ~t ticuld Apply to Co1~ 2 An inco~atible visual affect caused by the tnt~ductinn of ne~ ~teria)s, colors and/or fo~-.,s in contrast to the surr~undln~ lanascape. A ~rcject tasil? visible, not easily screened, that is ¢~vioust~ ~if~ere~.-¢r~ nthers around it. P~je:t viil r~.sult in the elietn~tion or m~jor screening cf scenic vi~s or vistas kn~-m ta be Other !..~.~CT OX H!.tTOR!C RESOURCES,, ~ILL PROJE~ L~-tP~.CT A~Y Sl~ O~ ~TURE OF KIS~RIC, .P~-EI)~,QR~C ~)2. PAL EQ)~$1CA~ I?~RTANC!? ................ Examples ~'~t 4ould Ap~ly ~ ~1~ 2 P~ject oc~Jrinq wholly or aa~tmlly within or c~ntiguous to any facility or site lis~d on the liatlonal ~eaister of historic places. 'Any i~ct to an a~h~ogical site or fossil bed located. wi thin the p~j~t si~. ~ Other im~a~s: !~41~.?T 0)( OPEH SPACE ~ RECREAT)O)! YES t:SLL Tl(~ F~JECT AF~EC1 THE CxJA~9'If~ OA ddALIll dF E~I&FI;(~. ;4C Y~S ~v Ex~ar, otes ~-~t Wou)d Apply to Col~ 2 ~- The pe~.~n-~t lo.closure of a future recreational o~oortunil;y. A ~ajo~ re~.uc:ion of an open space Import. ant to the co~aunity, Other i~a:ts: I~P~CT n, TRA~SPORTATIO)( ~':LL Tk~ ~i ~.'1 [FFECT ~0 EXISTING TRANSPORTATIOI( SYST["S? .................................... L .......... Exa~ole~ ~at ~ould Aoply to Column 2 ~l:eratio~ of present patterns of t:ove~ent of people and/or ~s. Project will result in severe traffic problems. Other 1-'. ~,':LL P'R0gECT AFF[:T TH-',. COt".MU~iT1ES SOURCES O? FU--'L OP, 143 YES Er~les tha: Woul~ Apply to Col~-m 2 F,--:je:t' c~usin.c oreater than S: increase in any form of ' er, e.~v use~ in municipality. Pr-:,.~ect requirin9 the c~eation or extension mf an energy t.,'ansmission or su~l? syste~, ~o serve more than 50 single or ~ f~ii.v residences. O~ner imDact~: ]M~AC'~ Ol-; NOISE E~,'~'Jles that ~ould Aooly ~ Col~ 2 ~lasting ~in 1,500 f~t ~f a hospi~l, school or other sensitive facility. ~ will occur ~inely (~re than one hour ~r day). P~ject ~il.1 ~duce oper~tin~ noise exc~dinp the -- lo:al ~ient'noise levels for noise outside of st~ctures. ' P~je~ will ~ve n~tural barriers that would act ~s a -1£. impacts: IMPACT OH HEALTH & HAT_ARD~ ~:M. PR~,IECT AFFECT PUBLIC ~)F. AL'~ AND SJ~F~'FY? ~..~ Ex-.m~les that Would Apply to Col~nn Z 'Pr~je~t ~('ll 'c~u~e ~ ris~ of explosion or release' of hazardous substances {i.e. oil, pesticides, c~em~cals, radiation, etc.) iK the event of ~ccident or u~set conditions, or there will be a c~nic lo~'level disgorge or e~issipn. P~ject that will ~sul{ in the burial of "hazardous Wastes"- (i.e. toxic, p~isonous,'highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, i~fe~tious, etc., includinq wastes that ~re solid, liquid or contain gases.) S~oe ~ciliti~s for one million ~r m~re gallnns of liouified natural g~s or other liquids. ix~.mole'that Would A~ol,v to Co'l~nn 2 .. The pol~ulation of t. he City, ~sident h~n population. The municipal budgets for c~tal expenditures ~ill involve any ~nent facility of a non-lgricultural - .. use In ~ ~gri~l~ral district er r~ve pri~ ~gricultural ~e p~j~ct will P~l~ce or eliminate existing facilities, ~t~c~ures or a~as of historic i~nce to the c~unity ' Development will induce an tn~ux afa pe~tculmr age g~up wi~ ~pecial n~ds. P~Ject will set ~ i~o~Jnt precedent for future P~.lects. ' businesses. Other 'i~act. s: IS THE~ ~SLIC CO.hFFROV£~Y ~C[R~IHG nE PR~ECT? ....... Ex,moles ~t Would A~ply to Colun~ 2 Either 9ovem~nt or citizens of adjacent co~unities have expressed ov~sition or ~jected the p~ject or have not been ~ntacted. Objections ~ the o~ject fro~ within the community. t~ pep ]..PA~,, ...',l l'l'(E ,~GXITU,~ OF IHPACT, PROCEED TO PART DET~.~I ?~ATIOtt . P. ORTIOltS OF FAF CC)~(PLETED FOR THI'S PROJECT.'. PART I PART II PART 3. Upon review of 'the Information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1, 2 and 3) and considering both the ~qnitude and i~ortance of each impact, it is reasonably datelined that: A. The project will result in no r~jor impacts and, therefore, · is one which ~ay not cause significant damage to the envtron~nt. Although the projec-t could have a significant effect on the envtronnent, there will not be a significant eCfect in this case because the ~itigation ~asures described in PART 3 have been included as part of the oroposed project. The project will result in one or n~re ~ajor adverse impacts that cannot be reouce~ and ~y cause significant damage to t~e envtror~ent. $iEnature of Prenarer (if different from respons__Lble officer) OFFIC~ USE ONLV PREPARE A AE('~TIVE D£DLARATIOI( PREPARE POSITIVE DECLAP~T]0:i PROCEED WITH ElS © Signature of Responsible Officia) in Lead Agency Print or :y~e name of responsible official in Lead Agency 0 G STIRRING L EAST MA PIPES COV~ WEST NECK BAY CK ~,~ chf Club 1965 1964