Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTRATAROS, GUS FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 August 30, 1988 TELEPHONE (516) 765'1892 Mr. Frank Cichanowicz, III~ President Briarcliff Landscape, Inco Route 25 Peconic, New York 11958 Re: Gus Tratoris - 1000-23-1-18 Dear Mr. Cichanowicz: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during their regular meeting held on August 25, 1988 regarding the abOve matter: Whereas, Briarc!iff Landscape, Inc. on behalf of Gus Trataros applied to the Trustees to scrape and clear existing lawn area and re-sod; build decorative berm and regrade to swale run-off away from the shoreline and to install a dry well~ and Whereas, the Town Trustees inspected the subject property Now Therefore Be It RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees Approve the request made by Briarcliff Landscape, Inc. on behalf of Gus Trataros for a Waiver to scrape and clear existing lawn area andre-sod; build a decorative berm and to regrade to swale run-off away from shoreline and to install a dry well on property located at 15098 Main Road, East Marion subject to any other agencies or departments approvals that may be required for this project. Very truly yours~ FAK:ip cc: Bldg. Dept. Z.B.A. D.E.C. Frank A. Kujawski, Jro President Board of Town Trustees FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 October 13, 1988 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Rob White /J' Briarcliff Landscape, Inc. Route 25 Peconic, New York 11958 Re: Gus Tratoris Rt. 25, East Marion, NY Dear Mr. White{ The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during their regular meeting held on September 29, 1988 regarding the above matter. RESOLVED that the Town Trustees amend a previous approval rendered on August 25, 1988 to include planting of a vegetative buffer zone of native species extending thirty feet inland from the top of the shore embankment. The area immediately above the bluff is to be swaled away from Dam Pond, sodded, and a drywell is to be installed to contain run-off from the lawn. Very truly yours, ank A, /Ku~awski, Jr. President ~ Board of Town Trustees FAK:ip cc: Gus Tratoris Route 25 Distinctive Landscape Concepts Peconic, L.I., N.Y. 11958 (516) 734-6366 September 1 9, 1 988 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Gus Tratoris Residence Route 25; East Marion, N.Y. Dear Trustees, In a settlement with the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation concerning the Tidal Wetlands violation at the Tratoris property, it was agreed that reparation would include the planting of s vegetative buffer zone of native species extending thirty feet inland from the ~op of the shore embankment. in our settlement of this matter with the trustees earlier this summer, it was agreed that the ares immediately above the bluff would be swaled away from Dam Pond, sodded, and a drywell would be installed to catch run-off from the lawn. We trust our agreement with the D.E.C. is in keeping with the spirit of, and will stand instead of our agreement with the trustees. RW:ad CC: Gus Tratoris Sincerely yo~rs, ~ Rob White Briarcliff Landscape, Inc. FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 August 31, 1988 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Frank Cichanowicz, III, President Briarcliff Landscape, Inc. Route 25 Peconic, New York 11958 Re: Gus Tratoris - 1000-23-1-18 Dear Mr. Cichanowicz: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during their regular meeting held on August 25, 1988 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Briarcliff Landscape, Inc. on behalf of Gus Trataros applied to the Trustees to scrape and clear the existing lawn area and re-sod; build decorative berm and regrade to swale run-off away from the shoreline and to install a dry well, and WHEREAS, the Town Trustees inspected the subject property NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees approve the request made by Briarcliff Landscape, Inc. on behalf of Gus Trataros for a Waiver to scrape and clear existing lawn area and re-sod; build a decorative berm and to regrade to swale run-off away from the shoreline and to install a dry well on property located at 15098 Main Road, East Marion. Please be advised that this determination is not a determination for any other Agency or Department that may have jurisdiction in regard to this matter. Very truly yours, K~jawski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees Distinctive Landscape Concepts Route 25 Peconic, L.I., N.Y. 11958 (516) 734-6366 August 15, 1988 Board of Trustees Town of Southoid Town Hall; 53095 Main Road Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Gus Tratoris Permit Application Since the project described in this permit application was erroneously begun prior ko the Board's review, and the area in question has been cleared and is open to the threat of erosion into Dam Pond, we ,acting as agents for the owners and with their consent, respectfully request a waiver of your standard permit procedures, such that the work can be promptly completed to~ the satisfaction of the Board of Trustees. Sincerely yours, Briarcliff Landscape, Inc. BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 APPL I CAT 1 ON NO . IDENTITY OF APPL i CANT ADDRESS OF APPLICANT APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE LAWS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 32 OF THE CODES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. PERMIT APPLICANT IF DIFFeReNT FROM AFORESAID LOCATION WIDTH HEIGHT A.OVE HIGH DEPTH BELOW LOW WATER YARDS TO BE EXCAVATED YARDS TO BE FILLED WIDTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY DEPTH AT LOW. TIDE AVERAGE RISE IN TIDE DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL ~ ~ FT. DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN THE AREA IS THIS FOR PRIVATE OR BUSINESS USE? '~.-1~6~. ~. AREA ZONING MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVER OR DEPOSITED FT. DESCRIBE ANY KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISE AND WHETHER ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERM! TS HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO ERRECT STRUCTURES OR TO DREDGE OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES AND WHETHER ANY PER~ITS OR LIC:ENSES WERE EVER SUSPENDED OR REVOKED BY A GOVERNMENTAL A~ENC¥ -~m~-~z,,.~.~___~~ _'~~_~_ _ ~=_~ ~_ _~_o_~_m _ _ _~,_ _~J.~T~_~_ _~_~ DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION AND PROPOSED CONDITION OF THE PREMISES AFTER THE WORK 15 COMPLETED INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF THE PROJECT SITE IF W~ITTEN CON~ENT OF T~ OWNER OF 'THE PROPERTY, I F NOT THE SAME AS THE ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED THAT ~ULD '~~~ PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT~ 14~. 6-~2 (2/87)-- 7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- Iy, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically e.xpert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full FAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given prolect and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a rewewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is id;ntified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions-of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 ~ Part 2 f-lPart 3 Upon review of the informatio~ recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: I--I A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which Will not have a significant mpact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATluN Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full FAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR ADDRESS CITY/PO NAME OF OWNER (If different) ADDRESS BUSINESS TELEPHONE STATE I ZiP CODE BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( CITY/PO STATE . I ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION IAJ~TAuLATtO~I oF. ~,~,~ ~1 ~ ~Tioj ~~ Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. I Present land use: I--IUrban []Industrial [-]Commercial [-],Residential (suburban) [-IRural (non-farm) ~Forest ri,Agriculture i]~)ther . 2. Total acreage of project area: 21,11:~1~1~ Y~-,~ acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) 1~}1;~1.~ I-~il~ ~ acres I/~ acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? ~,~,/'~ a. Soil drainage: ~]~Vell drained /~ % of site ~Moderately well drained % of site FqPoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? ~,J,~ acres. (See 1 NYCRR 37/0). 4. Are there bedrock outcropp ngs on project site? E-]Yes a. What is depth .to bedrock? (in feet) 2 5. 'Approximate percentage of ~ oposed project site with slopes: ~10-10 ,~ ]00 % [10-15% []15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? []Yes Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? I--lYes ~No What is the depth of the water table? ~_J~'A (in feet) Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? I-lYes [;~No Do hunting, fishing or shell fish ng opportunities presently exist in the project area? I~Yes J~No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? []Yes jNo According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geologi'cal formations) I-lYes [;~o Describe 9. 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? I-lYes J~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? I--lYes 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name ']~ 17. Is the site served by-existing public utilities? ~f'es []-]No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [;~'es I~No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? []Yes [;~No 18 Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, AYtic[e 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? 19 Is the site located in or substantially~ntiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~[~'Yes [No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? I--lYes j~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of ~roject (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor b. Project acreage to be developed: acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped acres d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ; proposed acres. acres ultimately. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completiob of project)? Multiple Fa 'r~/ h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions: {in feet) of largest proposed structure height; j. Linear feet of fr. ontage, along a public thoroughfare project will occupy i~? 3 ft. width; Condominium length. 2. How much natural material (i.e.. ,Ock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ~J'~:~ 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~l~t~. 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [-INo I-qN/A a. If yes, for what intend~ purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I~es []No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? i--lYes [-INo How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? J~ acres. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or Other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? i-lYes ~E~,l o . . If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction ~ ' ;[~ months, (including demolition). If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated JV ~ (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I /~/~ month c. Approximate completion date of final phase ll~ month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? I-lYes I-]No--' Will blasting occur during construction? l-lYes ; after project is complete tons/cu'l~ic ~ards year, (including demolition). year: i-lYes E~o If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I-lYes ~]~o a If yes. indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste d. isposal involved? I--lYes ~1o Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain , 15. 16. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Will the project generate solid waste? r-lYes ~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If ,/es, will an existing solid waste facility be used? I-lYes F-]No c. If yes, give name , location d. i-lYes []Yes Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? If Yes, explain r-lYes 17. Wil the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes. what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? 19. Will 20. Will 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? If yes , indicate type(s) F-lYes years, F-lYes .~qo j~No tons~month. project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? I--lYes project produce operating no~se exceeding the local ambient noise levels? []Yes J~No ~No l-lYes ~O 22 If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping pacity /~'"~' gallons/minute. . A 23.Total anticipated water usag~ per day ~ gallons/day. 24. Does project'involve Local, State or Federal funding? E3Yes J~No If Yes, explain 4 : 2~. ~pprovals Required: City, Town, Village Board ~Yes [-]No City, Town, Village Planning Board I--lYes I-INo City, Town Zoning Board E3Yes I-INo City, County Health Department t-lYes I-iNo Other Local Agencies f-lYes i--iNo Other Regional Agencies i-lYes F-INo State Agencies I-lYes i-INo Federal Agencies I-lYes L-]No Type Submittal Date C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? I--lYes J~No _ If Yes, indicate decision required: i-lzoning amendment i-lzoning variance l-lspecial use permit I-Isubdivision [~site plan I-]new/revision of master plan I-Ireso'urce management plan F-Iother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if dev,eloped as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoni6g of the site? /J A · 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~Yes t--INo 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~¼ mite radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ~¼ mile? ~es I--]No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? ~ ~ a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water di'stricts? l-lYes 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? F-lYes ~o a. If yes, is ex~sting capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? l-lYes l-INo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? I-lYes ~'~1o a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? I-lYes [-1No D. Informational Details Attach any additional infOrmation as may be-needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse im0acts assocIated with your proposal, please discuss such ~mpacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. If the action is in the Coastal Area,~.:~ou are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with ~his assessment. 5 Part 2--'--'~OJECT IF~IPACTS AND THEIR ~.GNITUDE . Responsibility of Lead Agency '~ General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the rev[ewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable' t~'roughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. -- _~ Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any mpact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND I Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? F1NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. . · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect t.'. .... ~y unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)[NO []YES · Specific land fbrms: 1 2 3 Small to Poten[ial Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I--lYes I-1No [] [] E~Yes I--]No L-] [] l-lYes fi]No [] [] I--~Yes I-1No [] [] I-lYes []No [] [] I-~Yes [--]No [] [] []Yes E~No [] [] [~Yes- []No [] [] []Yes I-[No [] [] [--]Yes []No IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) [Z]NO EZ]YES Examples that would appiy to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction m a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? I-]NO i-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? E3NO F-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action wilIzequire a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation c~using any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presefltly do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action wou[d use water i~ excess, of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extc, nt that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts:. 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? []NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact' Project Change [] [] I--lYes I-1No [] [] I-lYes [-]No [] [] []Yes [-'q No [] [] I--lYes l-]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [--]Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I-lYes []No [] [] I-lYes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes I--INo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes L---1 No [] [] [-']Yes- . []No [] [] []Yes [--1 No [] .~ []~ []Yes [-]No [] [] []Yes []No -~'[] [] [~Yes [--]No · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? i-INO i-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? []NO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? [-INO i-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? E~NO Examples that would apply to column 2 E3YES · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) Small to Potential Can Impact Be' Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I--lYes r-lNo 'r-~ [] J-JYes J-]No [] [] fi'lYes J-]No [] [] - I-lYes F'-] No [] [] I--IYes J'-JNo [] [] E3Yes [] [] I--lYes [--]No [] [] I--lYes I-]No [] [] i-lYes I--INo [] [] ~Ves I-1No [] [] I-lYes I--]No [] [] l-~Yes [-1No [] [] I-lYes ?lNo [] [] F'lYes I--1No [] [] ['-lYes ['-I No [] [] E3Yes I-1No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures Ce.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? [-1NO [YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding [and use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses. or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or s gnificant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES. 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? E3NO [-]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to ·column 2 E]NO []YES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A major reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] J-]Yes ['-INo [] [] J-]Yes f-lNo [] [] i~lYes [-]No [] [] ['-lYes []No [] [] [-']Yes I-]No [] [] ' [--]Yes [-]No [] [] [-]Yes I'---[ No [] [] [-lYes I--INo [] [] [-qYes . [--[No [] [] [-']Yes I--I No [] [] I--lYes i--INo [] [] i~[Yes ~No [] [] [--]Yes [] [] F-lyes i--INo IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? E3NO E~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in maior traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? [-iNO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family res dences or to serve a major commercial or industria' use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? I--INO r-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour ;)er day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ~INO E~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, .radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. · Other impacts: I 2 --3 ' Small to Potential Can Impact B~ Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change - [] [] l--lYes I-]No [] [] i--]Yes l--]No [] '[~ I-lYes I-]No [] [] i-lYes r']No [] [] []Yes r-]No [] [] r-]Yes I-]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes I-]No [] [] l-lYes []No [] [] []Yes [--[No [] [] []Yes- . []No [] I-~. []Yes []No [] [] [--]Yes []No [] [] []Yes []NO -[--] [] []Yes []No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? []NO F~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. Other impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] [--]Yes []No [] [] ' [--I Yes []No [] [] I-lYes []No [] [] []Yes ]-']No [] [] []Yes i--]No [] -~ []' []Yes I--INo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes I']No [] [] I-lyes []No 19_ Is there, or is there likely to be, pu~)lic controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? t-INO Il,YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if [he impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information ava able, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the ~mpact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 2,,87 -9c6 ! 7.2 1 SEQR Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review V suat EAF Addendum This form may be' used to provide additional information relating to Question l 1 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Project and Resource (in Miles) 0-1/4 l/~ - 1/2 1/2-3 3-5 5 + Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public [] [] .... [] [] [] observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the National or State [] [] [] [] [] Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? [] [] [] [] [] · The State Forest Preserve? [] [] [] [] [] · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? [] [] [] [] [] · National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding [] [] [] [] [] natural features? · National Park Ser~ii:e lands? [] [] [] [] [] · Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic [] [] [] [] [] or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such [] [- [] [] [] as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated interstate [] [] [] [] [] or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as [] [] [] [] [] scenic? · Municipal park, or designated open space? [] [] [] [] [] · county road? [] [] [] [] [~ ' · State? [] [] [] [] [] · Local road? [] [] [] I~ [] 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible seasons) []Yes []No during other 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? .?] Yes ~ NO DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT " 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within '1/4 mile *1 mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested [] [] Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential [] [] Industrial [] [] Commercial [] [] Urban [] [] River, Lake, Pond [] [] Cliffs, Overlooks [] [] Designated Open Space [] [] Flat [] [] Hilly [] [] Mountainous [] [] Other [] [] NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: * 1/2 mile [] Yes [] No * 1 miles []Yes ~-]No *2 miles -[]Yes []No *3 miles [~] Yes [--]No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate EXPOSURE 6. The annual',numi0'er of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work [] [] [] [] Involved in recreational activities [] [] [] [] Routine travel by residents [] [] [] [] At a residence [] [] [] [] At worksite [] [] [] [] Other [] [] [] [~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORK )SS: BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS, AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THAT THE WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GRANTED. in completin9 this application I hereby authorize the Trustees~ agent or representative to enter onto my property to,~n~p~ct the premises in conjunction with revie~.~his ~ppl~ca~o~;~ SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF ~~~--- , ,9 NOTARY PUBLIC CLAIRE L GLEW _l~ubli;, State of NewY~k EXAMINED APPROVED "WETLANDS" PERMIT (CHAPTER 97) APPROVED "BOAT,DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) DISAPPROVED "WETLANDS PERMIT" (CHAPTER 97) DISAPPROVED "BOATS,DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) CONDITIONS, IF ANY EXAMINING BODY SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 ¸'CE .: /:,::,,' >/ ,, j I ' %i ' '; S. .: i · :: .