Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-3884Board Of $outhold Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO .... 38.8.4 .................... DATE: ..D.~m.b~:....;~!, 19 Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of the State of New York, 1893; and Chapter 404 of the Laws of the State of New York 1952; and the Southold Town Ordinance en- titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTION5 IN AND .ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LAND5 and the REMOVAL OF SAND. GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LAND5 UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting held on D.e.c.¢mb'e'r'..20 19..9.0. .... and in consideration of the sum of $ ........................... paid by of .......................................................................................... N. Y. and subiect to the Terms and Conditions listed on the reverse side hereof, of Southold Town Trustees authorizes and permits the fOllowing:. to construct a single familY dwelling a minimum of 75' land- ward of the tidal wetland boundary and install a sanitary system greater than 100' from the tidal wetland boundary as a~ survey of 10/23/90 SUBJECT to a 50' buffer & no accordance with the detailed specifications as presented in the originating application.. conventional turf lawns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees Eere- by causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the ,~d Board as of this dat,e, i TERMS and CONDITIONS The Permittee Torsten Johnson residing at Cedar Point Drive, ~outhold N.Y., as part of the consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and pt~'ibe to the fol- lowing: 1. That the said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any and all damages, or claims for damages, of suits arising directly or indirectly as a result of any oper- ation performed pursuant to this permit, and the said Permit~ee will, at his mt her own expense, defend any and all such suits initiated by third parties, and the said Permittee assumes full liability with respect thereto, ,to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Soudaold 2. That this Permit is valid for a period of 7.4 mos. which is considered to be the estimated time required to complete the work involved, but should circumstances warrant, request for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date. 3. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely, or as long as the said Permi~ wishes to maintain the structure or project involved, to provide evidence to anyone concerned that auth- orization was originally obtained. 4. That .the work involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its agents, and non-compliance with the provisions of the originating application, may be cause for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. 5. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. 6. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along the beach between high and low water marks. 7. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in the location of the work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigation, the said Permittee will be requited, upon due notice, to remove or alter this work or project herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southold. 8. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee mt the completion of the work auth- orized. 9. That the Permittee will obtain ali other permits and consents .that may be required sup- plemental to this permit which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same. TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthill William G. Albertson Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF' ToWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 .February 1, 1993 Land Use Company 2576 Sound Avenue Baiting Hollow, NY 119'33 Re: Torsten Johnson - Permit 33884 SCTM~ 1000-92-1-2.1 Dear Mr. Bowman: The following action was taken by the Board of Trustees at their regular meeting of January 28, 1993: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees approve the request for extension on permit ~ ~4 to expire December 27, 1993 for a one family dwelling. If. you have any questions, please give us a call. Very truly yours J n~~M. Bred----e~ President, Board of Trustees JMB/jmd TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski, Jr. John L. Bednoski, Jr. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 December 27, 1990, Tanya Lachenmeyer Land Use Company~ 2576 Sound Avenue Baiting Hollow, NY 11933 Re: Torsten Johnson - SCTM ~1000-92-1-2.1 Dear Ms. Lachenmeyer: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during its regular meeting held on December 20, 1990 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, LAND USE COMPANY IN BEHALF OF TORSTEN JOHNSON applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated July 23, 1990 and, WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on December 20, 1990 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT LAND USE COMPANY ON BEHALF OF TORSTEN JOHNSON BE AND HEREBY IS GRANTED PERMISSION UNDER THE WETLAND ORDINANCE TO: construct a single family dwelling a minimum of 75' landward of the tidal wetland boundary and install a sanitary system greater than 100' from the tidal wetland boundary as per survey of October 23, 1990. There shall be a fifty foot buffer and no conventional turf lawns. Located at Cedar Beach Harbor. This permit will expire two years from the date it is signed if work has not commenced by said date. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project. Please return to the Building Department for a determination on the need for any other permits which may be required for this project. Permit will be issued upon payment of the following fees for work to be done below Mean High Water Mark: Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB:jb cc: Bldg. Dept. Conservation Advisory Council file TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer. III. President Henry P. Smith. Vice President Albert J Kmpski, Jr. John L. Bednoski, Jr. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765- t 892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 October 26, 1990 Tanya Lachenmeyer Land Use Company 2576 Sound Avenue Baiting Hollow, NY 11933 RE: Torsten Johnson / SCTM ~1000-92-1-2.1 Dear Ms. Lachenmeyer: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees at its regular meeting held on October 25, 1990: RESOLVED that the Application of Land Use Company in behalf of TORSTEN JOHNSON until the Board can review the revised survey dated October 23, 1990 at their next field inspection on November 9, 1990. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB: j mt cc: CAC TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski, Jr. John L. Bednoski, Jr. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 September 28, 1990 Tanya Lachenmeyer Land Use Company 2576 Sound Avenue Baiting Hollow, NY 11933 RE: Torsten Johnson / SCTM #1000-92-01-2.1 Dear Ms. Lachenmeyer: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees at its regular meeting held on September 27, 1990: RESOLVED to TABLE the application of Land Use Company in behalf of TORSTEN JOHNSON until the Board is in receipt of a new survey showing numbered flags and 2' contours. Should you have any questions, please contact this office. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB:jb cc: CAC Building Dept. File BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 APPLICATIO~ IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK, FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE LAWS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN, AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 32 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. APPLICATION NO. ~7~~7~-1 ~~~t DATE 7/16/90 APPLICANT' S NAME: Torsten Johnson TEL. NO. 718-816'0632 MAILING ADDRESS: 104 Townsend Avenue, Staten Island, N.Y. 10304 AGENT: Tanya Lachenmeyer/Land Use Company TEL NO .516-727-2400 AGENT ADDRESS: 2576 Sound Ave., Baiting Hollow, N.Y. 11933 PERMIT REQUESTED TO: Applicant proposes to construct a single family dwellin~ a minimum of 75' landward of the tidal wetland boundary and install a sanitary system greater than 100' from the tidal wetland boundary. LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR HAMLET: - REQUESTED PERMIT: Cedar Point Drive E~st, Southold TAX MAP NO: 1000- 92-01-2.1 CREEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY: Pleasant Inlet, Cedar Beach Beach Harbor and Inlet. SIZE OF PROPOSED WORK: LENGTH: 61 ' 34' WI DTH: )p. Page 2. YDS. TO BE EXCAVATED: n/a YDS. TO BE FILLED: 500 c.yds. MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED: Fill will be placed to meet flood and SCDHS requirements. WIDTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY: n/a DEPTH AT LOW TIDE: n/a AVER. RISE IN TIDE: n/a DISTANCE TO NEAREST CHANNEL: n/a DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN AREA: AREA ZONING: Residential IS PROJECT FOR PRIVATE OR BUS. USE: Private INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY: Single f~mily residence DESCRIBE KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON PREMISES: none known HAS ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMIT BEEN ISSUED TO ERECT STRUCTURES, DREDGE, OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES: Yes, N.Y.S.D.E.C. Permit No. 10-84-0226 Trusgees Permi% No. HAS ANY LICENSE OR PERMIT EVER BEEN REVOKED OR SUSPENDED BY A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY: No DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION OF PROPERTY: n/a DESCRIBE PROPOSED CONDITION OF PROPERTY AFTER WORK IS COMPLETED. AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITE IF NECESSARY: Please see project description INCLUDE ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED WHICH WOULD PROHIBIT no THIS PROJECT: WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER IF NOT THE SAME AS APPLICANT: enclosed COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORK ) Tanya Lachenmeyer/Land Use ComDan¥ BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS THATSHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS, AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER.SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE, TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Signature ~ Applicant NOTARY PUl 16%h DAY OF July , I J CHARLI:S W, BOWMAN ~ ~ NOTARY PUBLIC, $taN~ oJ New YQrJ~ 19 90 EXAMINED BY APPROVED DISAPPROVED CONDITIONS (If any) SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 14-16-4 (2/87)--Text 12 i~PR~)JECT~ I,D, NUMBER '-~ 617,21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR Tanya T.achenmeyer/Land Use 2. PROJECT NAME for Torsten Johnson Private Residence SEQF 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality Southold County Suffolk 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street act(3ress and road intersections, 13rominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) Cedar Point Drive East (map enclosed) SCTM No. ~ 1000-92-01-2.1 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: ~New [] Expansion [] Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Applicant proposes to construct a single family dwelling a minimum of 75' landward of the tidal wetland boundary and install a sanitary system greater than 100' from the tidal wetland boundary. 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially '1 , ~ acres Ultimately '1 . 3 acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? [] Yes [] No If No, describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? [] Residential [] Industrial [] Commercial Describe: [] Agriculture [] ParklForest/Ooen space [] Other 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE QR LOCAL)? ~Yes [] No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals ·. N.Y.S.D.E.C. and SCDHS 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes [] No If yes, list agency name and permit/approval 12. ASA RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMiT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? [] Yes [~ No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name:Tanya Lachenmeyer/Land Use for Torsten Johnson ' ' Date: 7/16/90 If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.127 If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL DAF. ~ Ye~ [] No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NyC~R, PART 617.67 If No, a negative declaration 4 may be superseded by another involved agency. [] Yes [] No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Long term, sho~t term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in Cl-C57 Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts (inclUding changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIA_ ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] No If Yes, explain briefly PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with i.ts (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure the explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive.declaration. -[] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: Name o~ Lead Agency Print or [¥pe Name o! k:e~,pon$1ble Officer in Lead Agency $~gnature of Kesponslble Ofticer in Lead Agency Date Title ot Ket, pons~ble OHicer Signature o! I~reparer (if different from responsible othcer) 2 14-1 b-~ (2~87)--7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQ~ Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a projec or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determim significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmenta analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affectin[ the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that: the determinatior process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides obiective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in~ the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 an~J 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFiCANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 1~ Part 1 [] Part 2 L'-JPart 3 Upon review of the informatio~ recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: I-J A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will ~ot be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* I-I C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ~ * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency I'nnt or rype Name oi Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Otficer /. Signature of Respons,bl'e Officer ~n Lead - ~~~ ~ency Signature ot~r~re; (Ii different Jrom ,espons,ble o~fi~ 7/16/90 Date PART1--PROJECTINFOR ~,TION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significan~ on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be con- as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public rewew. Provide any adc information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not i new studies, research or investigation, if information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION (Inclucle Street Adclress, Municipality ano County) Cedar Point Drive East, Southold, Suffolk NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR Tanya Lachenmeyer/Land Use Compan~r ADDRESS 2576 Sound Avenue CITY/PO BUSINESS TELEPHONE (516) 727-2400 Baiting Hollow NAME OF OWNER (If different) Torsten Johnson ADDRESS 104 Townsend Avenue CITY/POt I STATE I ZIP CODE N.Y. 11933 BUSINESS TELEPHONE (718) 816-0632 Staten Island STATE I ZiP CODE N.Y. 10304 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Applicant proposes to construct a single family dwelling a minimum of 75' ,of tidal wetland~oundary and install a sanitary system greater than 100' the tidal wetland boundary. landward from Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: I-IUrban rllndustriai [:]Forest r"lA§ricuJture 1.3 2. Total acreage of project area: APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Drushland {Non-agricultural) Forested - l-lCommercial r-IOther [~Residential (suburban) acres, PRESENTLY 0 acres .16 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) C-rave[ c]riv~ra~ 0 acres · 18 acres 0 acres .96 acres ~ acres 0 acres r-lRural (non-~ AFTER COMPLETIC ~ act .14 ac[ 0 ac( .18 ~cr 0 act .ql act, .04 acr, · 03 ach 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? RdR R~v~rh~_ad ~andy T,r3arrl a. Soil drainage: I~Well drained 90 % of ~,ite ~htoderately well drained % of site I~Poorly drained 10 % oi site b. If any a~ricultural land is revolved, how many acres of soil are.classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370), 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~Yes ii'No a. What is depth to bedrock? 600+ (in feet) · S, '~pproximate percentage at .,_.Oposed project site with slopes: j~0-1'b ,0 95 ?6 F'110-15 % .. rg'115% or greater 5 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the Nation, Registers of Historic Places? I-)Yes f~No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? []Yes 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0'-5' (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? r-lYes I~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? I~Yes I~No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangerec i~Yes i~No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological forrnatiom l-lYes 1'31No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area ('-lYes l~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to'the community? C]Yes E~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area:Pleasant Inlet (tidal creek) a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area' a. NameUn-named fringe marsh bordering Pleasant Inl~.% Size (In acres) __ TT~nwn 17. Is the site served by~xisting public utilities? EYes I~iNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? f~Yes INa b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allo~v connection? ~Yes ~No 1;L Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, A~ticle 25-AA Section 303 and 304? []Yes I~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 []Yes ~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous ~vastes? I-lYes [~No B. Project Description 1. Physical d~mensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 1.3 b. Project acreaqe to be developed: 1,:J acres initially; 1.3, c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: ~/~ (If appropriate) e. if the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n/a f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing, O ; proposed 2 g. Maximum vehicular trip5 generated [)er hour 1 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of hotJsing units: One Famdy Two Family Multiple Famll,,, Condominium Inltialh/ 1 UIt,matelv 1 il Dimens,ons (in feet} of largest proposed struct~.s~ than h3e~;ht; ~34' width; 61' length. J. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project wdl occupy i~? 26' ft. 3 acres. acres ultimately. much natural materi,' e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed f, 2. How the site? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? l-lYes I-INo a. If yes, for what intend..d purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? l-lYes I'"tNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? l-lYes I-INo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? .1'7 ' acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? I-lYes IX'I No ' 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 6 months, (including demolition). 7. if multi-phased: n,/a a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? l-lYes 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 10 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? tons/cubic month year, {including demolitio month year: I"IYes I-INd' ; after project is complete 0 I-lyes [~No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I'-lYes a. If ,yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~]~k'es i-lNo Type Sanitary effluent 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? I-lYes IX]No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? i~Yes [-lNo 16 Will the project generate solid waste? []Yes f-lNo a. If yes, what is the amou~:t per month 0.1 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Z~'Yes I-1No c. If yes, give name $ot:tho!d Town Landfill ; location d. Southold Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary andfill? l-lYes If Yes, explain 17, 18. Will 19. ~Vill 20: Will Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? l-lYes a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. if yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. project use herbicides or pesticides? I-lYes [~No tons/month. project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? I-lYes project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? l-lYes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [Yes I-lNo If yes , indicate type(s) 'R.'lv'c'f.~'~I, =__~_d ~eP. ti~ ©~ 1 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity '10 gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage pet day 300 _ gallons/day.- 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding.,? r-lyes R'INo If Yes, explain I~No 4 '- '~$.'~Approvals Required: - City, Town, Village Board i-lYes l~lNo City, Town, Village Planning Board I-lYes I'-INo City, Town Zoning Board r-lYes E]No City, County Health Department I~Yes I-INo Other Local Agencies ~Yes I-1No Other Regional Agencies I-lYes State Agencies ~Yes IZINo Federal Agencies I-lYes I-1No Type Sanitary System Southold Town Wetlands Permit Submit Date 7/16/9 7/16/9 ~rti~l~ 25 ~ C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision.~ I-lYes ~{~No If Yes, indicate decision required: ~ I-lzoning amendment F-lzoning variance I-Is. pecial use permit r-lsubdivision ~]site plan [-Inew/revision of master plan F'lresource management plan l-tother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? Residential "A" 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Single family dwelling 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site.~ Residential "A" 5. %Vhat is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? i~Yes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ;~ mile radius of proposed action? Single family residential - Residential "A" 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? l~Yes [ 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed?.... n/a a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts.~ ['-lYes ][ 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, po fire protection)? l-lYes I~lNo " a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? I-lYes I-INo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? I-lYes I~ a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? l-lYes [2]No D. Informational Details Attac~h any additional information as may he needed to clarify your project. If there are or rn'ay.be any adv, impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigat, avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant~Sponsor Name Tan~fa Lache:nme~er/Land Use Company Date 7/16/90 Signature Title Project Manager If Ihe action is in lhe Coastal Area, and you are a slale agency, complele the Coastal Assessment Form before proceed with this assessment. P~..~' 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND 'i HEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency '' General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significa Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significanCe. Identifying an impact in column 2 sin asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of. impacts and ~vherever possible the threshoh magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable'tl~roughout the State for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropr for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impaq:ts and thresholds to answer each quest~ · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. - .... Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but thresh~ is lower than example, check column 1. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART If a potentially large impact checked in ~:olumn 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moder~ impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. TJ must be explained in part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ~NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water, table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 f~et of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2 Will there be an effect t: .... ~y un.que or unusual land forms found on_ the site~' (i,e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)~NO [~YES · Specdic land forms: 6 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact B Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Chan~ [] [] l-lYes r-'lNo [] [] []Yes []No L--"J [] []Yes [~No [] [] F-~Yes []]No [] [] (-1Yes I-1No [] [] ~'es []No [] [] I:]Yes []No [] [] []Yes I:]No [] [] EYes []No [] [] r-lYes nNo IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated Ks protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) E3NO [=]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? i'-I NO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? I-]NO ?,YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will _require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action · Proposed Action reclulres water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumpin~ capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect 8roundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely c:,u~e siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to tr;e ex['~:.nt that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroluum or chemical products greater than 1,100 ~allons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may requtre new or expansion et ~:XlS[l[lJ[ waste tleatment an(J/or storaqe faciht~es. · Other impacts: Will proposed action alter drain,,qe fh~w or patterns, or surface water runol't~. [~NO ._..~ E S~" ' Excmples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Act,on would ch~n~e flood water daws. 7 , I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Moderate Large Mitigated I Impact Impact Project aha [] [] i'IYes [] [] [] F-lYes [] [] [] r-]Yes [] [] [] l-lYes [] EEl [] []Yes [] [] [] EE]¥es []; [] [] I-)Yes []~' [] [] [-)Yes [] [] I-)Yes []: I'-i ~ F-lYes [] [] I-)Yes []~, [] [] F-lYes F-l~, [] [] [~]Yes.. F-1I~ [] [] []Yes I-'lb [] E2 []Yes F-l~ '~. tm ~,Yes [~N Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. PropoSed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? I-IN• I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? I-IN• I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduct,on of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list. using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: 9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? I-IN• l-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ' Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or m~t:ratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres o! mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources./ ON• F~YE5 Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed acuon would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land lincludes cropland, hayfields; pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 1 Small to Moderate Impact O [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] lq. [] [] [] [] [] [] t, Can impact Mitigated By Project Chang~ []Yes •No OYes •No I-~Yes []No OYes []]No OYes •No OYes I:-INo r'lYes []No i-lYes I-IN• r']Yes []No []Yes []No [] []Yes •No [] I-lYes []No [] []Yes .I-IN• [] i-lYes r'iNo OYes FqYes []No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5, acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? r"lNO I-lYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screenang of scenic wew$ known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact n 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact E Mitigated B; Project Chan£ [::]Yes i--]N~ [~Yes r-IN, [::]Yes r-lN~ []Yes I-'lNc ~]Yes r-]No L-"J Yes r-INo E'J Yes 1-"1 N o ~JYes r-]No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? [:]NO I'-iYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially with'in 6r substantially con[,guous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · proposed Action will occur ,n an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites bn the NY5 Site Inventory. · .Other impacts: [:]Yes E3No I-~,Yes ['-]No I-lYes l--]No .I--lYes [-'tNo IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality ol: existing or future ripen spaces or recreauonal opPortunit~es.~ Examples that would apply to column 2 r"lNO l-lYES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ' · ^ ma~or reducuon of an open space ~mportant to the commumty. · Other ,mpacts: [-~Yes .~No E]Yes []No I-'lYes []No IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ~NO nYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ',teration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. oposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ther impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? I'-1N O I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 oposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ',y form of energy in the municipality. oposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy msmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family sidences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. ther impacts:' NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS Will there be obiectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? I-]NO I-lYES ~xamples that would apply to column 2 ;sting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive c~lity. Jots will occur routinely (more than one hour per day), ~posed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ~b~ent noise levels for noise outside of structures. ;posed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ,se screen. her impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH Will ProPosed Action affect public health and safety? fqNO f'IYES ~xamples that would apply to column 2 ~posed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ~stances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of ::ident or upset conditions, or'there may be a chronic Iow level charge or emission. ~posed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any m {i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly .reactive, .radioactive, irritating, ,ctious. etc.) m~e facilities for one million or more ;.;allons of liquified natural or other flammable liquids. nosed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance :~n 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazarclous ~r ~mpacts: 10 I 2 ~3~--- Small to Potential Can Impact Moderate Large Mitigated Impact Impact Project Chan! [] [] I"'IYes r-IN [] [] I-lYes I-IN [] '1~ []Yes ~ ~ ~Yes' ~ ~ ~Yes ~Nc '~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes- . ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No · ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? DNO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Pro;~osed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.8. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts:__ I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact I Moderate Large Mitigated B Impact Impact Project Chan [] [] i-lYes I--IN [] [] ' L-lYes ['-IN [] [] I-'] Yes I-'IN [] [] I--lYes I-IN [] [] I-lYes I'-IN [] --. F'T [:]Yes l-IN, [] [] r"lYes r-JN~ · [] [] I-'lYes I-~N~ [] [] .I-'lYes I--I Nc 19. Is there, or Is there likely to be, pubiic controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts.~ I-]NO I-lYES If .Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATIOH oF THE I~J1PORTANCE OF Responsibility of Lead Agency' Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact[s) may b~ mitigated. Instructions ~ Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 1, Briefly describe the impact. 2. D~scribe (if applicablel how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s) 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to. conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irrevers~bility, includin[~ permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potenhal divergence from local needs and .qoaJs · Whether known oblect~ons to the project relate to this nnpact. [Continue on attachments) 11 617.21 A Appendix B Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relat, ing to Question ! ! of Part 2 of the Full EAF. Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ,.to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public [] [] .... [] [] [] observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the National or State [] [] [] [] [] Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? [] [] [] [] [] · The State Forest Preserve? [] [] [] [] [] · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? [] [] [] [] [] · National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding [] [] [] [] [] 'natural features? · National Park Sera, ice lands? [] [] [] [] [] · Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic [] [] [] [] [] or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such [] [] [] [] [] as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated interstate [] [] [] [] [] or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for -establishment or designation? · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as [] [] [] I'-1 [] scenic? (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Project and Resource (in Miles) 0-~,~ ¼-V~ 1/2.3 3-5 5 + · Municipal park, or designated op,en space? [] [] [] [] [] · County road? [] [] i-'1 [] [] · · State? [] [] [] [] [] · Local road? [] [] [] E~. [] 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) []Yes []No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible.~ EYes r-~: No CEDAR BEACH N 85" 58' 55" E 97.27' / / / / / / / / ./ / / / / / HARBOR / N / EAST REA = 1.331acres (re TiE LINE) LOT NUMBERS REFER TO MAP OF "CEDAR BEACH PARK" FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SUFFOLK C~UNT.Y CLERK DEC. 20, 1927 AS MAP NO!~ 90 The Io~a. tione of welle and ee~poola ehown hereon are fro~ field ebeervk~one and er from data olJtaieed froe~ otltara. The water a~ply and aewag.~ dtep_oeal Prepared in accordance with the .~..n~mu.m ~yetema for thie ~eei. d. eee_e .~.ill ~eeform PiPE 0 C..P, 0 c.P DA TA DARK BROWN CERTIFIED TO: PECONIC ABSTRACT INCORPORA SOUTHOLD SA'VINGS BANK TORS TEN T. OCT 23t SUR VE Y OF TOW. PROPER T Y A T BA YVIEW TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, 2~ Y' 1000- 92 01- Scale 1" = 40' 'July 6, 1990 Sept. 10, Oct. 2 3, ~. Y.S. LIC.