HomeMy WebLinkAbout1091
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK
ACTION OF THE ZONING BOAI~D OF A~EALS
Appeal No. 1091 Dated April 24, 1967
AC'CIOI~ OF ~ ZONING BOA~%D Ol~ ~-PPEAi~ OF THE TOV~N OF SOUTHOLD
William E. and Hilda C. Folkes
To
590 Riley Avenue
Matt£tuck, New York
DATEMay. ~1 ,...1967
Appellant
at a meeting of the Zooming Board of Appeals on Thursday, May 11,
was coImidered and the action indicat~.d below ~vus,, taken on your
( ) Request for ~ariance due to lack of acceas to groperly
(X) Request fro3 a specia~ e~ception under the Zoning Ordinance
( ) Request for a. variance to the Zoning Ordinance
( )
1967 the al~eal
L sPI~CIAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a special e~ception ( ) be granted
( ) be denied pursuant to Article ............... Section ................ Sub~ectten ................ paragraph
.............. of the Zoning Ordinance, and the decision of the ~ullding Inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) be
confirmed b~ause8:~30 .P~M. (E.D's~T.)' UPon application of~Will~iam E and
Hilda C. Fglkes, 590 Riley Avenue, Mattituck, Ngw~ York, for a
variance in a~ccordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section
303, Artidle X, Section 1000A, for permissionto ~divide p~operty;
Location of property: south east side Riley Avenue, Rot number 12,
G.S. Riley & Others, Mattituck, New York.
2. VARIANCE. By'resolution of the'Board it was determined that
(a) Strict aDglication of the Ordinance (would) (would not) ~roduce practical d~fficulties or unnecessary hardship
because
SEE REVERSE
(b) The hardship created (is) (i~ not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared ~oy all properties alike in the
immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use distr~ct because
SEE REVERSE
(c) The variance (does) (doe~ not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) (~vould not) change the character
of the district because
SEE REVERSE
and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( ) be denied and that the
previous decisions of the Building Ir~pector ( ) ~oe confirmed ( ) be reversed.
PORM ZB4
baa . ittmann{ Secretary
After investigation and inspection the Board finds that
the applicant requests~ permission to divide property. The
applicant is the owner of two 75' lots. Both lots have
ample area. These lots are located on a filed map. The
map was layed out in 75 foot lots and at the present time
it is not feasible to enlarge the size of the lots. Both
of the lots in question will be used as a one family residence
so there will be no change in the character of the neighborhood.
In general, the Board is in agreement with the reasoning of
the application.
The Board finds that strictapplicat$on of the Ordinance
will produce practical difficulties; or-unnecessary hardship;
the hardship created is unique and would not be shared-by all
properties alike in the /mmediate vicinity of this property~and
in the aame use district; and the variance does,observe the-
spirit of--the~Ordinance and will not change the character of the
district.
Therefore, it was RESOLVED William E. and Hilda C. Folkes,
590 Riley Avenue, Mattituek~ New York, be granted permission
to divide property as applied for. Location of property, lot num-
ber 12, G.S. Riley and Others, Mattituck, New York.
File in duplicate
Fee $5.00 -.~
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK
APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR
TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y.
~, ~ ' ~.,,.%fm., ~.,..~.. ~ilda...Q ~.. ~o!k.e.s of .......... ~9.0 ...... ~...RLley...Awa ...........................
'Name of Appella,nt Street and Number
~ ~ ...... .~.-..Y...-. ............ HEREBY AppEAL TO
· ..................... .Ma.t.t..,~%. ~e k. ................................................
· ' Municipality State
THE ZONING BOARD O'F APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON
Division of Property
APPLICATION FOR~~,~ ..................................... DATED ..Apr. ii..2..Lk,...19.62 ..................
WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO
Wm. E
z:z~o.a C. Folke s
Name of Applicant for permit
of
~.O.. ~%il, e.~-...A.v.e ..... Mat .%i,%..uo ~ ............ ............................ ._. .............................
Street and Number Municipality 5tote
( ) PERMIT TO USE
( ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY
(X) PERMIT TO DIVIDE PROPERTY
1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY ...~/.'.~....~.~..Z.~?~.....~.Lz.e. ................................. ~.t.%.[[...D..~.s.& ...............
Street Use District on Zoning Map
..G..:S.Rzley].; ...... .~ ............................................................ & Others 12 I~ Mattituck, N.Y.
lv~op No. Lot No.
2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AP, PEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub-
section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordi,nance.)
Art III ~ae303 & A~t ,X sec !O00A
3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for
(X) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordin.ance or Zoning Map
( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (.State of New York Town Law Chap. 6.2 Cons. Laws
Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3
4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal ~ (has not) been made with respect, to this decision
of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property.
Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit
( ) request for a variance
and was made in Appeal No ................................. Dated ......................................................................
( )
(X)
( )
REASON FOR APPEAL
A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3
A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance
is requested for the reason that: We must
But does have .... '
s~i t iciest area.
front and and amele area.
seA_ lot # 12 which has only a 7~ft ~
~ront
This will us with lot 13 having ?~ ft
Form ZB1
(Continue on other side)
REASON FOR APPEAL
Continued
1. STRICT .APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces-
sary HARDSHIP because This property is one of the lots on the filed map
' bh_,s time there
of Geo Riley & o~hers~ a_,l having 7~ ft frontage an_ at ~, ~
is no way of enlarging these lots.
2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate
vicinity of this property and in this use district beoause We own two
other lots are owned individua!y
3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE
CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because All of these Tots ~re used for one
~ ~' ~r~ "~ wz~,.~ be no change or harm to the neighborhood.
zam~±y d,~it%~gs so there ' '-'~
STATE OF NEW YORK )
)
COUNTY OFSuffoik )
SS
.... }~r,. ~e.~...~. L ¢~. ..... r; .......
Signature
Sworn to this ................. .2...~. ........................ day of ............................. ..A.p.?...i.}. .............. 19 67
· IS, GB't~NPORTo B'. Y., FIIIDAY, MAY 5, 1967
LEGAL NOTICE
~,~ ~ Notice of Hearings
l~msuant to Section 267 of the
Tow~ La~ and the provlaion~ of
ante of the Tc~n of S~uthold,
Suffolk C~tmty, N~' York, pt~blic
hearl~s will be held by the Zon-
ing Bc~vd of Aflpeals of the Towz
of Southold, at ~ Town Office
IMain Road, Sm~thold, New York
on the llth day of May, 1967,
the ~ollowing appeals:
7:30 Pa~I. (E.D~.T.), Upon
plics/~ton of Russell Tabor and
So~, Orient, New York, for a
cial exee~ion in accordance with
the Zoning Ordinance, Article X,
F, estion 1003~, for permission to
renew a farm labor camp permit
I gr~ed May 5 .1986. Loc~tton
pix~erty: east side Pla~ Road
:Orient, New York, .bounded north
~by W. B. Karcher-V. T. Latham,
.east by R. W. Glllk~pio, south by
~ G. W. ILalk~k, west ~by Platt Road.
~ 7:35 P.M. (~LD~q.T.), Upon
p]ieation ,of Ed's Sign Service, 958
w.. ,Main ~reet, Rlverhead New
York, a/,c AI'~ Liquor Store, Grif-
fin Street, Cutchc~ue, New York,
~or a special exception in accord-
ance with~.~ahe Zoning Or~.ce
Article IV/Section 408, S~
~ (~) for permission to' ~ ~ct a
grour~ sign with insufficient
,setback. Location of ~erty:
north side ~ Road arid Grif-
'fin S~reet, Cutcahogae, New York,
,bounded north by Chas. Schnei-
der, eas~ by A. J. Terp, sou~h by
Main Itoad, west by. z'.jiffin
'/:~50 Pa~i. (EI)~.T.), ap-
plication of W~alter Ter'n ~o, ~qew
~uf~olk Road, Cutoho~ New
York, for ~ &pecial exeef ?r~ in
'accordance with the Zonh:;
'dlnar~ce, Article IH, Section 300,
Suq~ection 8, for permission to re-
tain an or~ prem~.~es identificaton
sign with inauF~cient setback from
pr0perSy 1Lu~. Location of property:
~w ~Suf~olk l~oad, Cut~hogue,
New York, bounded north by W. H.
Case-Terosko, east by J. Wiclmham
~st., south by J. A. Tuthlll Eat.-
~cebe; west by Beebe-~er-
esko.
8:00 P'a~. (E.D~S.T.,, Upon
plicatior~ of ~ohn Elak, Main
Road, C~tohogue, New York, for a
special exception in accordance
with the Zoning Ordinance, Arti-
cle ILI, Section 300, S~bse~tion 8,
for .perrai~on to retaba farm
s~and signs. Location of property:
south xide Main Ra~d, Cutohe~ue,
New York, boun~icd north by Main
Road, eas~ by M. Elak, south by
M. Eaak west by District Linei
8:~5 P:M. (.~.~D~.T.), Upon
pllcation of Valentine Ruth, IV, 2
WilkJns Place, Tenafly, New Jer-
sey, for a special exception in ac-
corcl~xce with the Zoniag Grdin-
a~ce, Article III, Section 300, s~b-
,~ection 9, for permission to retain
the following signs for Arsha-
.m~. -,'e Colony: 1) one subdi-I
~is~on sign with insufficient set-
b~ck, located on the sout~ sid~
[vIiddJ. e ~ ~reenport, New
York, boun~led north ~by Middle
Road, east .by sout~a
Cassidy, west b~'
2) two area identification
,~uth side Middle P,~ad, Green-
por~, New York, bounded north by
Middle l~oad, east by ~0roperty of
Rach, so,th by iprivate road, west
~y land of Ruch~
8:30 P.M. (~E)~S.T.), :Upon ap-
plication of Walltam E. and Hllda
C. Folhes, 5~ Riley Avenue,
titnck, New York, for a variance
in accordance with the Zonh~g Or-
dir~an~e, Article HI, Section 363,
Article X, Section l~09A, for
mission to divide property. Lora-
tion of propor~y: south east side
Riley Averme, iot number 12, G. S
RUey & Others, I~atti~uck, New~
Y~rlL
X, Sect/o~ 1000A, for permission to It,
~livide ~ro~erty. ~n ~ ~-]K, ~ ss:
e~y: n~ w~t side ~r]
N~ Y~k, ~t ~rs 9 a~ 10 ~ ~.~9~9: .......... ~an~ duly Sworn,
P~ ~ ~r~es S~i~- ' ............. FOLK
9:.30 Piti. (E~DJS.T.-, Upon
plication of William M. Bcebe,
Hew Suflol,k ~ane, Cutchog~e, New
York, for a variance in accord-
ance with the Zaning OrdL'~ance,
Article LII, Section 303, Article X,
Section 100~A, for portaL, ion to di-
vide property. Location of prop-
ev~y: west side New Suffolk Road.,
Outcho~e, New York, "B" Basi-
neas Disiriot, bounded north by
'R. G. Cb, arch-Williams, east by
i~Tew Sm*folk Road, sovth by Fin-
kle, west by Congregational So-
ciety.
9:45 P~/I. (E~D.~.T.), Upon
pllcation el George W. Smith
Sons,' Main ~trcet, Southoai, New
York, a/¢ DaiAloy, Cedar Beach
l~ark, Souti~oid, New York, for
~A'ia~ce in accordance with ~
Zop~ag Ordinance, Article
Section 3(Itl, for permJ~sion to con-
stra~ ,an addition with l~suffi-
cent front yard sethack. Location
of property: pri~ate right of way,
Soulchold, New York, lot l~um~r
118 Ltl Cedar Beach Park Subdl~
vision.
10:00 P.M. (E~)~5.T.), Upon
plieatitm of Irving L. Pri~e, Jr.,
i~l., ~reentx~, New York,
Sollthokl ~trnmer Theatre Inc., 19~
~arlton Averred, Brooklyn, New
York, for a v~ Lu
~°rdar~e wltla the Zoning Ordin-
~, Article I_II, Section 300, For
per~ to qperate a place of
a~nusement. L0c~llon of property:
N~ York, ,bounded north by Main
Road, east by Greenpm~ Hemes,
~trb., south~by railroad, west hy
Fleet Ltm~ber, Inc.
Any person desiring to be heard
on any of 12re above applieations
should appear ~t the time and
pl~ce above specified.
DA'limP: APILIL 2'/, 1~67, BY OR-
TOWN BOAP~D OF APPEALS
lt~M5
~sp~per ,published ~t Greenport. in said
;tic~. ,of which the ,annexed is n printed
~ed in the suid Suffolk Weekly Times
....... ' ....
week~
n~ on the ... ~.{~.~.~. .............
,~is .ill ,~, ~ .....
..... .. I
......." ....
plicatkm of Le~er~s P. P_~tson,
Esq., So~thold, ~ew York, a/c
CI~ Bl~k~n, ~tel
nia, 73rd Street ~ Br~dw~,
New York, New Y~k, a~
~yea We~r, Cu~e, N~
~ce wi~ the Zon~g Or~,
A~cle X, ~tion i~A, A~icle
IH, Section 3~, for ~on to
u~ an under~ p~cel of land.
~tlon of pr~rty: ~uth ~de~
N~ S~folk Ave~ue~ New Su.f~k,
N~ York, ~ nor~ by New
S~olk A~enue, east by C. C~e,
sou~ by P~nic ~ay, west by M.
H. ~Kwood~M. C~.
9:~ P. M. (E.D.S.T.-, U~n
Eugene ~ad, Cuttle, New
York a/c J~k C~rke, V~
~, ~t~e, N~ York, for a
v~i~ ~ ~ ~th the
Sec~on ~, for ~on ~ re-
~ a ~ ~ ~ff~t
z~b~ f~ the pro~y ~e.
Loc~t~on of pro~rty: n~th ~ide
S~lors L~e, Cu~ho~e, Ne~
York, ~d ~r~ by M. V.
B~. ~ by M. V. Braatz.
~by Sailors Lane. we~ by M. V.
Braatz.
8:15 P~. (~.T.), Upon ap-
pl~at~ ~f ~li~ Wtck~m,
~., ~;tituck, N~ York, a/c
~d C. a~ ~tilda Bi~, Hay-
wa~ ~, ~gue, New
~e ~, ~tlon 3~ & ~7, ~Mcle
7 ~ 9 lo
'75'
'?,5
Stat~ I.~ce.c~