The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1093 TO%VN OF SOUTHOLD, NEY~ YOI%K ACTZON OF TM ZOW~NG BOam0 OF aPPEZ~S Appeal NO. 1093 Dated April 27, 1967 To George Ahlers a/c Jack Clarke 855 Eugene Road Vanston Road Cutchogue, New York Cutchogue, New York DATE . .M.a.y...%.1. j.. 1967 Appellant at a meeting of the Zonh~g Board of Appeals on Thursday, May 11, 1967 %vas considered ~and the action indicated below was taken on your ( ) Request for variance due to lack of access to pr6Perty ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance (~ Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance · ( ) the appeal I. 8PECIKL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the ~oard it was determined that a special e~ception ) be granted / ) be denied pursuant to Article ...... : ..... Section ............... Subsection ................ paragraph ............... of the Zoning Ordinance, and the decision of the ~uUdi~ Inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) be confirmed because ~ 9~.00' P.M. (E.D.S.T.), Upon application of Geor~3e Ahlers, 855 Eugene Road, Cutchogue, New York, a/c Jack Clarke, Vanston Road, Cutchogue, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, SeCtion 304, for permission to retain a budding with insufficient setback~ from the property line. Location of property: north side Sailors Lane, CutChogUe, New York, bounde~ north by M.V. B~aatz, east by b}.V. Braatz, ~south by Sailors Lane, west by M.V. Braatz. 2. VARIi_NCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that ia) Stric~ application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship because SEE REVERSE (b) The hardship created (is) (i~ not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because SEE REVERSE (c) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) (~vould not) ch/w. ge the character of the district because SEE REVEREE and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( ) be denied and that the previous decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed. ~ ZB4 ~G BOA/%D OF APP/gALS~ /] ~ Barbara C. Dittma4~n, Secretary After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to retain a one family residence with ~sufficient front yard setback. The house is approximately one foot in violation. The Board finds that the applicant is able to relocate the property line so that no violation occurs. The Board fin~s that strict application of the Ordinance will not produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is not unique and would be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district and thr variance does not observe the spirit of the Ordinance and w~ ~hDnNgSh~ character of the district. T~erefore, it was RESgLVED George~A~rs, 855 E~gene Road, Cutchogue, Ne~. York, .a/c Jack Clarke, Vanston Roam, Cutchogue, New York, be den~ed permiss,ion to retain a building with ~nsufficieqt set ~ck from the property, li~.e; as applie~ for. Location of the property: north side Sailors Lane, Cutchogue, New York. ,. GP,~J~I~)R?, /~. Y,~ F~tlDAY, MAy 5, 1967~ ~ ~ X, ~tio~ 1~ ~or ~n SS ~t ~ ~t~n 267 ~f ~e ~, ~u ~t, ~e, ~ of ~e ~ ~ ~u~o~, ~. ~ff~ ~ty, N~ York, ~ 9:~ P~. (E~.T.-, U~n ap- ~rinter and Publisher of the SUFFOLK h~ ~ ~ ~ by ~e Zon- ~i~t~n of W~ ~ ~, ~d ~ ~ ~ ~e ~ N~ Suffo~ ~, ~, New ws~per pubiish~ ~t Greenport, in said ~ld, at ~ Town ~fi~, York, f~ ~ ~r~ In ~- ~ ~, ~ld, New Y~k, ~ ~ ~e Z~ ~ce, OtiCc, of which the ,anne~d is ~ printed on ~e 11~ day of ~y, 1~7, on ~le I~, ~ 3~, ~i~e X, {hed in the ~d Suffolk Week~ Times the w~g ~: ~:~ P.M. (~.~.), U~n ap- vide ~r~y. ~t~n of ~- r .C~. /~ L. week~ of R~H T~r ~d ~Y: w~t s~e New Sufio~ ~,~ .................... c~ e~tion ~ ~r~ ~th n~ D~t~t, ~ded no~ by ~t, N~ Y~k, ,~ ~h ~tion of G~e W. ~th & . ~, ~u~ld, New York, ~or a .~[:~ ...... :~ ....... ~'''~ .... ~''' ~ ~th ~e Zo~ ~, ~ld, -New York, l& (a), for ~r~on ~ erst a ~1~. ~' -~ ' ground ~ wit& insufficient 10:00 P.M. (E.D~.T.), U~on ap- setback. Location of ~ro~0erty: plicat/an of Irving L. Prtce, Jr., north side Mah~ ~ and Grff- Esq., Green!sort, New York, a/c fl~ .Street, Cutc~2~-ue, New York, Southoid Sununer Theatre Inc., bounded north by Chas. Schnei- Carlton Averse, Brooklyn, New der, east by A. J. Te~, ~outh by York, for a variance in ~ P,~/~d, west by Griffin ~orda~ce ~ the Zaning OrdJn- Street. a~ce, Article I~I, Section 300, For 7:50 Pg. (E~.S.T.i, Upon ap- ~err~.~on to o~to ~ place of l~lic~tton of Walter Teresco, New amusemenf~. Loca~tion of property: /Suffolk Road, Cutchogue, New soutll side ~ Ro~d, ~rt, York, for a special exceptto.~ in New York, ~bounded north by Main accor~ with the Zoning Or- Road, east by Green~o~t Hcene~, ~l/nance, Article III, Section 300, ~Sub., south ~by railroad, west by Suf~ectto~ 8, for permission to re- Fleet Lumber, Inc. ~ain an om ~rem~es identfficaton Any ~erson desiring to .be heard sign with lnsu~cient se~,b~k fram on any of t&e above applications ~rc~er~y I/ne. Locatkm of ~roperty: should a~pear ~t the time and ~tew Suflolk P,~, C~tcho&-ue, ~lace ~bove specified. New York, .bour~ed north by W. H. DA'~m~: APP,~L 2~, I~67, BY C~se-Teresko, east by J. Wick~a~n DER OF ~ SO~LD Est., sout& ~by J. A. Tuthlll Est.- TOWN BOAttD OF A~PF, AL~ ~eebe; ~vest ,by Beebe-Ter- 8:00 P:M. (E.D,5.T.,, Upon ap- pllc~atio~ of ~n ~k, ~, ~o~e, N~ York, for a ~ ex~t~ in ~rd~ i~th ~e ~ ~, ~e ~, ~tion ~, S~t~n 8, f~ ~ ~ r~ f~m s~ s~. ~tl~ of ~r~y: ~u~ ,~e ~ ~, Cu~e, New York, ~u~ ~ by ~n ~d, ~ by M. ~a~, s~ by~ M. ~, west by ~trict ~e. 8:15 P~ (E~.T.), U~n ap-~ W~ P~, T~, N~ Jer- ~y, for a ~t~ e~p~on in ~r~ce with the Zon~ ~e, ~ticle IH, ~ian 300, ~tton 9, f~r ~ to ~ ~e foxing ~ for Ars~- m~ue ~1o~: 1) one s~l- ~n si~ ~t& ~ufficient ~t- ~k, 1~ on ~e ~ ~de ~e ~, G~en~t, N~ Y~k, ~ ~ ~y Middle ~, e~ by T~es, ~u~ by ~y, w~t by ~ and o~rs; 2) two ~ tdentlfl~t~n s~, ,~ s~ ~e ~, Gr~n- ~rt. ~w Y~k, .~ ~r~ .by. Ru~, ~ by p~v~te ~, west~ ~by land of R~h. 8:30 P~ (E~.T.), ~pon ap-[ ~k~on of ~m E. ~d Hi~a C. Fol~s, ~ ~ley Avenue, M~t- tick, ~ Y~rk, for a v~a~e~ ~ ~ wl~ the Zon~ ~- A~t~le X, ~t~ I~A, f~ m~on ~ ~v~e ~y. ~a- t~n of ~i~: ~uth e~t Riley Ave~, lot nm~r 12, G. S RHey & ~h~, ~ttituck, New Y~k. plica,tlc~ of ~e~ert, s p. Ed~on,| Esq., ~ld, ~w Yar.k, a/c nla, ~3rd St~t ~ Br~dw~, ~w York, New York, and yea Weber, ~e, Article X, ~t~n 1~, A~icle IH, ~ct~on ~, for ~on u~ ~ under.ed P~cel of land. ~t~on of P~rty: ~th ~de N~ Suffolk Avenue, New Suffo~, N~ York, ~ ~r~ by New S~folk A~e~ue, ~,st by C. C~, south by P~ic ~y, west by ~n of George ~lers, Euge~ ~ad, Cu~e, New York a/c J~k C~ke, ~d, ~e, N~ ~ork, ~r a S~on ~, for ~m~on ~ re- .at,on of pretty: nor~h sMe S~lors L~e, Cu~h~ue, New York. ,~d~ nor~ ~by M. V. B~. ~ 'by M. V. Braatz. ~Y Sailors L~e. west by M. V. ~i~ti~ ,of W~ Wlckham, ~ C. ~ ~tHda Bigg, Hay- TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR ..... tic ! ~ r. 2 ._C ~ 5 - - ~ZZJ-~2C 0 £- APPEAL NO. A~r~ ~7,~967 DATE TO THE_~QN.i~,_G BOA~RD OF APPE_ALS,_TOWN._OF sgU~T~H0~E, N.,Y.: ........ n^/~ George Ah!ers , _ .......... ~f ................... ~.9 ..... ; .... :...:.., .... ,~ ...................... ~v'~ _r.1 x~ .,.....~...~...,.?.~'"~'"~','"-t'"''~" ~'* .... ~'~ ..... ~ F ' ~-(' ' , c-~ '~ ~ ..... '- ~ n- ~Name of ~ppellan;t ; .... Street and Number ....... c "c C~ o~e~ r c ~ ........ :c c '- 7 New- Y~ k --, ........ P'AL ............. : .............. M:~:Dv ~K : TO _ MuDi~ip~lit _ - State T~NE ZONING BOARD. OF_APPEALS FROM THE DECISION GF THE BUILDING INSPECTOr_ON. APPUCAT ON PE MIT NO.. DATE ............................................ ."L'Z'7-'L'J.":"-'U'('L"Z"'WZ'"Z" WHEREBY THE DUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO .... y ~c _ . ................................................... ~ ~.,, ~o~ga A~La~s AC ~aa~ ~] ..... ' ............ Name of Applicant for parmit o~ va n s t on R oa a ...~.~.g;~ g.a~A ............................. ~...~9.~ ~. ......... ...............................................Street and Number Municip~[ity State PERMIT TO USE ( ) ( ;9 PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY ( ) 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY .... ~.~..~..i..9..r..~....L..~...n.~ .................................................................... Street Use District on Zoning Map .~,OH- 6 ! 0 lv~ap No. Lot No. 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the 'Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordi,nance.) Article TTT~ 304 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (X) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordin.a.nce or Zoning Map (~ ;) zA V~ARI~NC~Cdue:' to'Jack~o~ access! (Sta:te-crF New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 .- 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL 'A Previous appeal (has) (has_not) been made wEh respect, to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such ~ppeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No ................................. Dated ...................................................................... REASON FOP, APPEAL ( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 (x) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) is requested for the reason that The Southw~s% corner over the 35 ~ front set back by t~O", of the house projects Form ZB1 (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEAL Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because The design and construction of the house are s~ch that unsaf~ st~uc{ure. Also %he mov~n9 of the .house~the sma// d~stance that ~t ~s in vio!ation~D~Id~serve no p~act~ca~ purpose.~cT~,house as it s~ts r~ght n~ do~s not v~olat~ public convenience, and w~Ifsre and justice ~s 5~n~ ~ubstantially~ se~ed. ~ The~ ~ established o~ permitted use of ne~gnDorhoo~ properties and adjacent use d[s%r~cts are not being substantially or permanently [njured~ 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by alt properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because : This Io¢ :is on the enct of' the circular 'turnaro-uaad which has recently been relocated ~ ~ an~. the lot slopes ~teepty tward the rear. 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because The smat~ amount that the h~use ~s in violation of the ordinance would not change the charact¢~ ~f the ~ ~h~ spirit of the ordinance is already be~n9 obscrVedo STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF Sworn to tkis day a{ ........................................................ Notary Public ~ ~ ~,,~;~,ul~ A. RE~EF~T NOTARY PU~L1S, Stata o~ Naw York ~o b2-32o01,_0 Su,m]~ bount~ ' ~rm ~pkes [~.a~ch 30, 19~