HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-4091 TRUSTEES
John M. Bredemeyen Ill, President
Albert J. Krupski, .Ir., Vice President
Henry P. Smith
John B. Tuthill
William G. Albertson
Telephone (516) 765-1892
Fax (516) 765-1823
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SUPERVISOR
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
EO. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
October 28, 1992
Merlon Wiggin
Peconic Aasociates,
One Bootleg Alley
P.O. Box 672
Greenport, NY 11944
Re: Linda Taggart
SCTM #1000-53-2-2
Dear Mr. Wiggin:
The following action was taken by the Board of .Town Trustees during
its regular meeting held on October 22, 1992 regarding the above
matter:
WHEREAS, Peconie Associates on behalf of Linda Taggart applied to
the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the
Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated July 15,
1992 and,
WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town
Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations,
and,
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect
to said application on October 22, 1992 at which time all interested
persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and,
WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar
with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and,
WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation
submitted concerning this application, and,
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will
not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of
the town,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees approves the application of
Peconic Associates on behalf of Linda Taggart to construct 24' X
33' single story antique marine and gift shop including access drive
and parking as applied subject to a continuous 6"-12" low profile
vegetated berm of 6' 8' in width shall be installed contiguous to
the parking area on the South and parallel to and no further East
than 20' from the rear of the building. There shall be no
disturbance of vegetation on the
berm.
seaward or waterward side of the
This permit will expire two years from the date it is signed. Fees
must be paid, ~ aDplicable, and permit issued within six months
of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and
the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project.
Permit will be issued upon payment of the following fees for work to
be done below Mean High Water Mark:
No fees
Very truly yours,
John M. Bredemeyer, III
President, Board of Trustee
JMB: jd
cc: Planning Board
Zoning Board
Building Dept.
Telephoue
(516) 765-1801
SOUTHOLD TOWN
CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL
TO:
Southold Town Board of Trustees
FROM:
Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council
DATED: July 23, 1992
RE: Recommendations
At its meeting held Tuesday, July 21, 1992 the CAC made the follow-
ing recommendations:
On a motion by Stephen Angell, seconded by Robert Keith, it was
RESOLVED to recomn~nd to the Southold Trustees approval with a
with stipulations of the Wetland Application of Linda Taggart
53-2-2 to construct a 24' x 33' single story r~tail marine antique
and gift shop with access driveway and parking.., ONLY AFTER there
is independent approval as approrpiate to the site by the Planning
Board and ZBA will the CAC recommend approval of the project
as environmentally sound with the following stipulations: that
thez~ continually be a natural vegetative buffer maintained and
left it a natural state; and that no chemicals be permitted for
storage or use on the site.
68320 Route 25, GreenP0rt
Vote of Council: Ayes: All
Motion carried.
On a motion by John Holzapfel,
was
RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold
of the Wetland Application of Betty M.
construct a~new wood deck.
1250 Bridge Lane, Cutchogue
Vote of Council: Ayes: All
seconded' by John McCormick, it
Town Trustees approval
Kunkel3. 118-1-16.1 to
On a motion by Stephen Angell, seocnded by John Holzapfel# it
was
RESOVLED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval
of Wetland Application of Walter and Stanley Krupski 84-2-3.3
tO construct a 125 1.f. oZ timber retaining wall',' 25' return
on east side; and armor with l! ton stone on filter cloth and
Board Of $outhold Town Trustees
SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK
PERMIT NO. 4091
DATE:. ~.~1~19~
ISSUED TO
LINDA TAGGART
Xutl nrizati n
Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Lews of
the State of New York, 1893~ and Chapter 404 of the Laws of the
State of New York 1952; and the Southold Town Ordinence en-
titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS
IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS end the
REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM
LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" end in accordance with the
Resolution pf The Board adopted at a meeting held on
19 97~ end in consideration of the sum of $ 150.00 paid by
of Southold N.Y. and subject to the
Terms end Conditions listed on the reverse side hereof,
of Southold Town Trustees authorizes end permits the following:
To construct a single story retail at~tique marine
and gift shop, with access drive & parking.
all in accordance with the detai~ed specifications as presented in
the originating application.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here-
by causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, end these presents to
be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date.
TRUSTEES
John M. Bredemeyer, 111, President
Henry P. Smith. Vice President
Albert I. Kmpski, Jr.
John L. Bednoski. Jr.
John B. Tuthill
Telephone (516) 765-1892
APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTE
SCOTt L. HARRIS
Supeswisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
e_~_~_~, Id, New Yo~ 11971
TOWN !.iF
COUNTY, NEW YORK, FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE LAWS,
ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS,
FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN, AND THE ISSUANCE OF
PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 32 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD.
APPLICATION NO.
APPLICANT'S NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
DATE June 11, 1992
Linda Taqqert TEL. NO~516)765-1052
P.O. Box 249, Sou.%hold, N.Y. 11971
AGENT: Peconic Assoc., Inc.
AGENT ADDRESS: P.O. Box 672~ Greenport, N.Y. 11944
PERMIT REQUESTED TO: construct a 24' x 33' sinqle story antique
and qJf.t shop including access drive and parkinq
TEL NO~5.16) 477-0030
marine
LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR REQUESTED PERMIT: 68320 Route 25, Greenport
TOWN: Southold
TAX MAP NO: 1000- 53-2-2
CREEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY:
SIZE .LF PROPOSED WORK:
LENGTh. + 80' (including
WIDTH: ~ 70' (1~cluding
N/A
parkin~ and landscapinq)
parking and landscaping)
Page 2.
YDS. TO BE EXCAVATED: 85 (for sanitary & YDS. TO BE FILLED: 100 (grading - building & pavemnt)
~r~ ~lis)
MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED: .~opsoi 1 to be
stockpiled and used for landscaping and granular fill
WIDTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY: N/A
to be used for slab &
drainage system
DEPTH AT LOW TIDE: N/A
AVER. RISE IN TIDE: N/A
DISTANCE TO NEAREST CHANNEL: N/A
DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN AREA: N/A
AREA ZONING: L I
IS PROJECT FOR PRIVATE OR BUS. USE: business
INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY:
retail antique marine and gift shop
DESCRIBE KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON PREMISES: none for a long {ime
HAS ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMIT BEEN ISSUED TO ERECT STRUCTURES, DREDGE,
OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES: N0
HAS ANY LICENSE OR PE~IT EVER BEEN REVOKED OR SUSPENDED BY A GOVERNMENTAL
AGENCY: N0
DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION OF PROPERTY:
see site plan
DESCRIBE PROPOSED CONDITION OF PROPERTY AFTER WORK IS COMPLETED. INCLUDE
AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITE IF NECESSARY: see site plan
ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED WHICH WOULD PROHIBIT
THIS PROJECT: NO
WRITTEN CONSENT OF O~ER IF NOT THE SAME AS APPLICANT:
attached
COUNT"f OF SUFFOLK )
STATE OF NEW YORK )
/~o~/~ ~ ~'~Zf~ ~ ~EING D~LY SWOm', DEPOSES
~D SA~S ~AT NE IS ~E AP~L~C~'~ ~OR THE ~OVE DESCRIBED PE~ITS, ~
~AT ALL STAT~ENTS CONTAI~ HEREIN ~Z ~UE TO THE ~EST O~ HIS ~OWLEDG~
AND BELIEF, AND THAT WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS
APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF
SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT'AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN
TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING
UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GP3%NTED.
IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR
AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE, TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES
IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION.
Sl~r~ature of Appl~ht
swom~ TO ~E~O~E ~E THIS
NOTAR~UB~I C
EXAMINED BY
APPROVED
DISAPPROVED
CONDITIONS (If any)
SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN
COMPUTATION OF FEES
Approved 2/27/85
Post-It" brand fax transmittal memo
ROAD (ROUTE Z~), GRE£NPORT0 NE~ YORK,
BY;
[;IA I [ .
State ~,ironment.l Ouality Revl.~ : 3111
Pu,po,e: The 'full E~F i~ desicned to help applicants and aSencie~ determi~T~
or action may be ~i~nifi¢ant. The question of whether an action may be liEnifi~t ti not alwayi easy to"~j ~r. Frequen
Iy, there are aspec~ efa project that are ~ubjective ot unmeasu~eable. It i~ also under~tood that ihose ~ determir.
licnilicance may have little o~ no formal knowledse of the environment or may be technically ~pe, in environment;
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affectir,
the question of li~nificance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and asen¢ies can ~e assured that the determinatio
process ha~ been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet risible to allow introduction of information to fit a project ~r actio~
~ull EAF Componenti: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Pa[t 1: P~ovides objective data and information about a ~iven project and its site. By identifyin~ basic proje~
data, it as~isU a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2
Part 2: Focuses on identifyin8 the range of possible impa¢~ that may occur from a p~oject or action. It provid~
~uidance as to whether ~n impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentiall~
larce impact. The form' also identifies whether an impact can be mitisated or reduced.
Part 3; If any impact in Part 2 is id;ntified as potentially-larse, then Part 3 is used~ evaluate whether or not th,
impact is actually important.
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Actions
Identify the Portions of EA£ completed for this project: [] Part 1 I-) Part2 ' []Part 3
Upon review of the informatio~ recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 -~'nd 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that.
A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s] and, therefore, is one ~vhich will not
have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
I=/ 8. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negalive declaralion will be prepared.*
C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.
· A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Name of ~Adlion
Name oi Lead Agencv
Print or rvp. e Name oi Response. O!hcer In Lead Agency Title of I?.e,pons~ble Ou,cer
S,~ure oJ Responsible Oli*cer in Lead Ag~cy S,gnazure o~ P,~parer [1~ ddierent ~rom ~espons~ble officer)
Date
· ' PART 1MPROJECT INFORMATION ·
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant.
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consi
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any add~
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. _
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not in
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and si
each instance. . .
NAME OF ACTION
Retail Antique and Gift Shop
LO.CA,.,TI~O~N .OF ~ACTION (IncJ,u~e Sire.et Address. Mu0i¢ipal~ly ~.r)d CoFn. ty,.[..
bt~J~:U Koute Zb, ~reenporl:, ~.Y. lt~qq, Suffolk
NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR
Linde Teggert/Pec0nic Assoc., Inc.
ADDRESS
P.0. Box 672, One Bootleg Alley
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
(516)477-0030
Greenport
"' ~ STATE ZiP CODE
I
N.Y. 11944
NAME OF OWNER (Il dlflerent) ~ BUSINESS TELEPHONE
Linda Taggert I t516 )765-1053
ADDRESS
P.O. Box 249
CITY,'PO I STATE I Zip CODE
Southe]d N.Y. 11971
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
construction of retail antique and decorative gift shop
complete wit'i~ perk!ag, landscaping and utility :service.
Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if riel applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: DUrban fllndustrial nCommercial CIResidential (suburban)
I-IForest I'-I,~gricuhure I~Other
2. Total acreage of project area: 0.3,~ acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE
/v~eadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural)
Forested
Agricultural (Includes orchards· cropland, pasture, etc.)
Wetland lFreshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECLI
Water Surface Area
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or flU)
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces
Other (Indicate typc'} ]andscaped
3. what is predominant soil type{s) on project site? canadice
vacant
I-IRural (not
a. Soil drainage, i~Well drained % of site I~,%loderately well drained ?~ e,; of site
~Poorly drained F~ % of site - ..
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within sod group 1 thr'~ugh 4 of t'.
Land Class,flcahon System? acres (See I NYCRR 370)
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site) I~Yes I~No
a What ~s depth to bedrock?_ (in fcetJ
PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLET]
0.35 acres 0.25
a
a
0 .08
C acres . 02 a
silt )nam
_ ~..-,%pprox mate percentage of proposed project site with slopes:
D10-10% I Bh
· I-zlS% or greater
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the"$tate or the Nation
Registers of Historic Places~ I-lyes ~No
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ayes [~C
8. What is the depth of the water table? 4- 6 (in feet)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer;i' I-lYes [~lNo
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? rqYes [~No
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or end~ngere,
r'lyes rJ~l N o According to
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formation,
I-Wes ~No Describe
13. Is the project site presently u~ed by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation are.
I-lYes [~No If yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? E]Yes [~No
15. Streams wi.'.hin or contiguous to project area: N/A
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a Name I~/A b Size (In acres)
17. Is the site served by ~'xisting public utilities? [~Yes aND
a) If Yes. does sufl;icient cal~acity exist to allow connection? I~Yes [-INo
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? I-lYes ~No
18 Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agrtculture and ~'larkets Law. Article 25-A
Section 303 and 304~ E~Yes l~No
19. is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article
of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 617[' l-lyes fflNo
20 Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? aYes I["lNo
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimens,ons and scale of project (Ifil in dimensions as appropriate)
0.35
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor
b. Project acrea~:e to be developed. 0.1 C) acres initially; 0.1 0
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0.25 acres·
d Length of proiect, in mi[es: ~/A ill appropriate)
e. If the prowct is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed . N/A ~..,:
I. Number of off-street DarLing spaces existing 0 ; proposed ~ '.
g A4aximum vehicular tr,p~ genurated per hour 5 (est..) (upon complutior~ of project)?
h II residc, mlal. Number and type u( housing umts: N/A
One Famdy Two Family A4L,It~plc Fanidy Condominium
Inihalfy
Llltlmatt.lv
i. O~mt'ns:ons (~n leer) of large?t pro. posed structure 17 Ileight. 24 ~,~,~dth. 3.3. . length.
j Linear feet of I'rontage along a public thoroughf3~e project ~vlll occupy i~? _ fl
acres.
acres ultimately·
2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Ii]Yes DNo C]N/A
a. If yes, for what intend,-' purpose is the site being reclaimed?
b. WiU top~oil be stockpiled for reclamation? r~Yes nNo
c. will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamationS' ~Yes
fro site? _ Q tons/cubic yards
landscapin~
I-1No
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site/ 0.08 acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old} or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
DYes ' ~lNo ' '
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction
7. If multi-phased: N/A
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1
c. Approximate completion date of final phase
d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases?
8. Will blasting occur during construction? I-lyes
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 5
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0
11. will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?
months, (including demolition),
month year. (including demolition)
month year.
DYes fflNo"
; after project is complete 1.5
I-lYes I~lNo If yes, explain
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes ~No'
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage. industrial, etc.} and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? I~Yes ENo?. Type ~anitarv -
14. ~,vill surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? I-lYes
Explain
toilet
~No~
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year ilood plain?
16. will the project generate solid waste? r~lyes f-INo
a. If yes, what is the amount per month 0.1 tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ~Yes nNo
Town Landfi ] ] ; location
c. If yes, give name
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill?
e. If Yes. explain
DNo
Cutchogue
DYes ~('] No
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste?
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal?
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life?
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [::)Yes
DYes I~lNo
tons/month.
years.
rRNo
19 Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per d3y)~ [:]Yes [~No
20 will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? DYes
21. Wdl project result in an increase in energy use? I~Yes I-]No
elactr~ca!
If yes , indicate type/s)
22. II water supply is f¢om wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. '
23. Total anticipated water usag~ per day 1 ~)0 ~allons/day.
24. l)oes project involve Local/State of Federal (unding~ {:::}Yes I~No
If Yes, explain ' '
~'INo
.25,:~Approvals Required:
Town,~Ooard [qYes r'lNo
City,
City·~Village Planning Board K'lyes I'-iNo
City,(~)Zoning Board E'lyes r'lNo
City, County Health Department ~Yes r'lNo
Other Local Agencies ~'lYes rqNo
Other Regional Agencies nyes I1C1No
State Agencies EYes l'-INo
Federal Agencies l-lyes CINo
Submittal
Type Date
· Greenoor% Water
Sanitary Facilities 5-18-92
Town Trustees 5-8-92
NY State DEC 5-8-92
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? l~'lYes I'-INo _
If Yes, indicate decision required: · .
I-lzoning amendment r'lzoning variance I~special use permit rqsubdivision Dsite plan
I'-Inew/revision of master plan f-lresource management plan mother
2. What is the zoning classificationCs)of the site? LI Light Industrial
;1. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
30% lot coveraqe
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? iq0 chanqe
· 5. What is the maximum potential, development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in'adopted local land use plans? [~Yes [-
'7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a I/, mile radius of proposed action?
Industrial and residentia!
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adloining/surrounding land uses within a % mile? I-Wes E
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A
a. What is the minimum lot size .proposed?
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? I-lYes
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services [recreation, education, po]
fire protection)? C]Yes P~No
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? I-lYes DNa
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? l-lYes ~N~
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? l-lYes I-INa
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may he noedud to clarify your project. If ther~ are or may be any ad~
impacts associated w~th your proposal, p~ease chscuss such impacts and the measures whjch you propose to mitigat
avoid them
E. Verification
I certdy that the information provided above is f~rue to the best at my knowledge.
Apphcant;6/~o"ns-~r bi. the ~ Date
Signature ' ~' ~_. .//////// : T.tle ' ~ .
If the action is in Ihe Coastal Area, and t~'~are a $1ale agency, eomptele Ihe Coaslal Assessment Form before procee.
~ith this assessment.
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION
r),H,, 04 19 93
LINDA TAGGERT
PO BOX 249
SOUTHOLD, NY 11971
APPLICATIC)N iD 1-4738-00556 00001-0
PERMITS APPLIED FOR
ARTICLE 25: TIDAL WETLANDS
PROJECT IS LOOAlq:.D IN SOUTHOLD ~N SUFFOLK CUBNr,'
THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT A 24 FOOT X 33 FOOT SINGI L~ 5, I CtRY
RETAIL MARINE ANTIQUE AND GIFT SHOP, SEPTIC SYSTEM, ACCESS E)RIVI- Ar,iD
PARKING LOT. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED AT 68320 ROUTE 25, GREENP()I{1 IN
THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. SUFFOLK COUNTY.
STATE Et~VIRONMENTAL OUALIqY FiEVIE~V (;51~QF]} L)E I~RMINATION
SEQR - 2 Project Is a Type I action and will nol have a slgnltlgan{ elfect oH lhe uiiVll~,llrlltHll A
coordinated review with other agencies was performed and a Negative DeclaraUuH ~5 (,H hie.
SEQR LF~A,D ^Gt:t4CY SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES
SHPA - 2 A Structural-Archaeological Assessment Form has beeB completed. The pH~p(~ed act~wty wdl
not have any Impact on reglslered, ehgible or invenlor~ed archaeological sile5 or h*slurlL; structures.
No further review in accordance with SHPA is required.
LAURA J SCOVAZZO
SUNY CAMPUS, BLDG 40, ROOM 219
STONY BROOK, NY 11790-2356
1516) 751-7900
AVAILABILITY FOR PUBLIC UOMMENrl
Comments on this project must be
submitted io writing to the Contact
Person no later than 0513/93
TO THE APPLICANT
I THIS IS NOT A PERMIT
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Dear ~.,r- ~(~(~.p,(y~[,,.
RE:
Thomas C. Jorllng
TOWJ OF SOIJ ...
LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST
The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environ-
mental Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR
Part 617 the following:
1. Your agency's interest in acting as lead agency;
2. Your agency's jurisdiction in the action described below; and
3. Issues of concern which your agency believes should be evaluated.
Enclosed is a copy of the permit application and a completed Part i of the
Environmental Assessment Form to assist you in responding.
DEC Project Number
DEC Permits:
SEQR Classification: ~ Type I [ ] Unlisted
DEC Contact Person: ~__6,~tCC. SCow6,~S C>
DEC Position:
[]
DEC has no objection to your agency or another agency assuming lead agency
status for this action, but reserves the right to comment on this action if
a positive determination of significance is made.
JOINT APPLICATU R PERMIT
[--]ARTICLE 9, TITLE 1, ARTICLE 43 6NYCRR (~46 (LAKE CEORCE RECREATION ZONE)
[-]ARTICLE 1S. TITLE 3 (AQUATIC PESTICIDES CONTROL) [~&N~CRR 327 {AQUATIC VEGETATION) E]6NYCRR 328 (FISH) E]bNYCRR 329(INSECTS)
~ARTICLE 1S, IlTLE $ 6N~CRR 608 (PROTECTION OF WATERS)
2 APPLICAN[ IS A.AN J~O~,ner ~loperator J~Lessee ~lMumopaht,, Co~ernmental Agency )Check as many as apply)
Linda Taggert / Peconic Assoc., Inc.
P,O. Box 249 1516 I 765-1053
Southold N.Y. 11971
4 NA~,{E OF [~Ossner []Agent, Contact Person (Check one)
P. 0 Box 672
Peconic Assoc., Inc.
TELEPHONE (~,here can be reached during da~)
(516) 477-0030
POST OFFICE STATE ZIP CODE
Greenoprt N.Y. 11944
County Suffolk JTown or c,tvS°uth°ld
I v,.age Greenport
68320 Route 25 .qj
POST OFFICE STATE ZIP CODE
Greenport N.Y. 11944
6 NA,ME OF STREAM OR BODY OF WATER N / A
[]]YES [~]NO Sh ..... k on map and/or d,a~ings ] [~¥e, ~NO
[]Publ,c [~Co .....iai July '92 August '92 J $ Enclosed
construction of a 24' x 33' single story retail marine antique and
gift shop including access drive and parking
Southold Town Trustees
ou o
> ~n la~outhojd IownZt~APlanning Board Suffolk County Health Dept.
/own
D f SIGNATURE //? TITLE
PART 1--PROJECT INF ATION
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be ¢onsi
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any add~
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not in
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and si
each instance. .
qAME OF ACTION
Retail Antique and Gift Shop
LOCATION OF ACTION (Inc u~e Se~e! Ad(Jress Mur}iclpal~ly I[9cl Co.gn y~,..
68320 Route 2~, ~reenp'or~, ~.Y. ~1~, Suffolk
NAME OF APPLICANi'ISPONS n
Linda laggert~°~econic Assoc., Inc.
ADDRESS
P.O. Box 672, One Bootleg Alley
i:~USIN ESS TELEPHONE
r516 ~ 477-0030
CITY/PO I STATE I ZIP CODE
Greenp0rt N.Y. 11944
NAME OF OWNER (if differentJ
Linda Taggert
ADDRESS
P.O. Box 249
I
USINES$ TELEPHONE
t516 t 765-1053
ClTYIPO 1 STATE I ZIP CODE
Southold N.Y. 11971
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
construction of retail
complete wJt~ park!rig,
antique and decorative gift shop
landscaping and utility:service.
Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: r'iUrban DIndustrial I~Commercial rlResidential {suburban)
~Forest r'lAgriculture [~Other
2. Total acreage of project area: 0.35 acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE
Meado~~, or Brushland (Non-agricuhura])
I:orested
' Agricultural [Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.)
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECL)
Water Surface Area
tJnvegetated [Rock. earth or fill)
Roads. buildings and other paved surl;aces
Other {Indicate type) ]andscaped
3. v/hat is predominant soil type(s) on project sile~' canadice
vacant
~Rural (no$
a. Soil drainage: (:]Well drained % of site 1(3Moderately v, ell drained ?r) % of site
~Poorlydrained ~} % of site ~'
b. I[ any agricultural land is involved, how many acres
Land Cbss,ficat~onS~tem? acres (See I NYCRR 370)
4 Are Ihere bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~Yes
a V,'h~t ,~ depth to bedrock? (m feet)
PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETi
0.35 acres 0.25
0 .08
~ acres .02 a
silt loam
~proximate percentage of I project site with slopes: r~0-1C~ 100 e,,,, 1[--110.150,g
· 1"115% or greater
,. Is proiect substantially Contiguous to. or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the:State or the Nation
Registers of Historic Places? I-lyes
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? I-lyes
8. What is the depth of the water table? -+ 6 {in feet)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? I-lyes
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? l'"4Yes r~No
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or end~ngerec
{~Yes ~No According to
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? {i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological forl'natio~
I-lYes [~No Describe
13. Is the project site presently u~ed by the commun,ty or neighborhood as an open space or recreation are.
C:]Yes [~No If yes. explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community.;' I~No
15. Streams wi:bm or contiguous to project area: N/A
a Name of Stream and name of River to svhich it is tributary
16 Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a Name N/A b. Size (In acres)
17. Is the site served by ~,xisting public utilities? [~Yes i'-]No
al If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to aUow connectio~' I~Yei [:]No
b) If Yes, ~¥,11 improvements be necessary to allow connection? ~Yes ~No
1~ Is the s~te I:~cated in ar, agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and /~'tarkets Law. Article 25-A
Secuon 303 and 304? i'qYes [~No
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6'17.~ rlYes II'lNo
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? I-IYes IC'iNo t
B. Project Description
1. Physical d~mens~ons and scale of project {fill in dtmensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0.35 acres .
b. Prelect acreage to be developed. 0 _ 10 acres initially, 0. 10 acres ultimately.
c. Projec~ acreage to remain undeveloped 0.~5 acres.
d. Length of project, in miles: ~/~ Jif appropriate)
~. JJ Ih~ project is an expansion, indicate percent o~ expansion proposed
{. Number cf off-street parkn~ spaces existing O ; proposed ~
g ~a~mun, tehlcular tr,p~ gent, rated per hour ~(eS~. ) [upon completion o~ prelect}?
h If ~es,dcnttol Number and type u~ housing urals.
One Famdy Two Famdy ~5.h~ple Fam.ly Condomini~
In,tLally
i. ~imt. ns~ons (,n leel} of largest proposed structure . 17 height: 24 ,,,dm: 33 . length.
j Lit, ear ~-~.', o~ iror, tage along a public thoroughfare project t¥~JJ occupy i~
_:w much natural materiOe., rock. earth, etc.)will be removed fO'the site? 0
Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ~i~Yes nNo F'IN/A
a. If yes, for what intend~J purpose is the site being reclaimed? I 8ndscspirl~
b. Will top~oil be stockpiled for reclamation? IT1Yes I-INo ' '
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? il(lYes f'lNo
4. How many acres of vegetation {trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0.0~t acres.
5. Will any mature forest {over '100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this projecti
DYes ' ~No . .
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 2
7. If multi-phased: N/A
a. Total numbei' of phases anticipated {number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I month
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month
d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [3Yes
8. will blasting occur during construction? l--lYes ~No
months, {including demolition]·
r~No"
tons/cubic .yard s
year, {including demolition)
year.
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 5 ; after project is complete 1 . 5
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? E]Yes ~No If yes, explain
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I-lYes ~]No'
a. If yes. indicate type of waste {sewage. industrial, etc.) and amount .....
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? P~Yes I-]No Type sanitary
Fxplain
15 Is prolect or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain?
16 Will the project generate solid waste? r~lYes E}No
a. If yes, what is the amount per month 0.1 tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? I~Yes r-tNo
c. If yes, give name Town L~ndfi 1 1 ; location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill?
e. If Yes. explain
-toi 1~
ayes rINo '
~Yes r-INo
Cutchogue -
I-}Yes ~'lNo
17.
18.
19
20
21.
Will the project involve the ~Jisposal of solid waste?
a If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposaR
b. if yes. v, hat is the anticipated site life?
Will project use herbicides or pesticides? I-lYes
[:]Yes I~No
tons/month.
years.
Will project routinely produce odors {more than one hour per day}~ I-lYes ~No
V,'~II project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise evels;' QYes
V,':[I prolect result in an increase in energy use? ~Yes [:}No
elactr~cal
If yes . ind,c;tc type(s)
22 If water supply is from svells, indicate pumping capacity N / A
23. lotafanticipated water usage per day 100 gallons/day
24 ~oes project involve Local. State or Federal [und~ng~ I-lyes
If Yes. explain
~No
gallons/m~nute. '
,Approvals Required:
City, Town,~illage~.Board t~'lYes V1No
City, O Village Planning Board IQYes l-]No
City,~'"~Zoning Board []Yes I-INo
City, County Health Department ~]Yes I-1No
Other Local Agencies ~"]Yes lINo
Other Regional Agencies I-lYes {'ENo
State Agencies ~Yes VINo
Federal Agencies DYes [-INo
C. Zoning and Planning Information
Type
· Greenoort Water
Sit~
~rial rvrp~tinn
Sanitary Facilities
Town Trustees
NY State DEC
Submitlal
Date
5-8-92
5-18-92
5-8-92
5-8-92
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~Yes DNo _
If Yes, indicate decision required: . .
I-]zoning amendment [:]zoning variance [~speciat use permit [:]subdivision I-Isite plan
Iinew/revision of master plan [:}resource management plan Dother
2. VVhat is the zoning cJassification(s)of the site? L I Light Industrial
3. ~,'hat is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
30% 10t covera.~e
4. VYhat is the proposed zoning of the site? no chanqe
· 5. Y/hat is the maximum potential, development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in'~dopted local land use plans? . [~Yes [-
'7. VVhat are the predominant land usels}and zoning cJassdications within a % mile radius of proposed action?
Industria! and residential
8 Is the proposed acbon compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? I-lyes [-
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, hov, many lots are proposed? ~/A
a. What is the minimum lot size .proposed?
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? DYes
11 Wdl the proposed action create a demand for an'f community provided services (recreation. education, poi
fire protection)? ("lYes ~No
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? IiYes DNo
12. W~I[ the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? l'-]Yes
a If yes. is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? l-lYes I'-INo
D. Informational Details
Attach an,,. additional information as may he nredc, d to clarify your project. If ther~ are or may be any ad~
imp3cts associated v.,th your proposal please discuss such impacts and the measures whjch Vou propose to mitigat
E. V~rification
Apphcan:,'~'~r bLe~nle ~ , Date ~
~,gnator£ Title '
If Ihe action is in lhe Coaslal A~ea, and 1/6d/are a stale agency, cornplcle the Coastal Assessment Form before procee.
New York State Department of Environmental Conservatio~n
Building 40--SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356
(516) 444-0365
FAX (516) 444-0373
!TOWN OF SOUTHO
1, 1993
Linda Taggert
P.O. Box 249
Southold, NY 11971
Thomas C. Jorllng
Commissioner
RE: 1-4738-00556/00001-0
Dear Ms. Taggert:
In conformance with the requirements of the State Uniform
Procedures Act (Article 70, ECL) and its implementing regulations
(6NYCRR, Part 621) we are enclosing your permit. Please read all
conditions carefully. If you are unable to comply with any
conditions, please contact us at the above address.
Also enclosed is a permit sign which is to be conspicuously
posted at the project site and protected from the weather.
Very truly yours,
Laura Scovazzo
Environmental Analyst I
LS/nw
enclosure
GI~I~RLlgS R. GUPPY
OLD ~DUNTI1X
November 20, 1992
Town of Southold Planning Board
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
$outhold, New York 11971
Attn: Bennett Orlowski, Jr./VS
Chairman
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Re:
Proposed site plan for Linda Taggart
Main Road, Greenport
Zoning District: Light Industrial (LI)
SCTM# 1000-53-2-2
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
I am in receipt of your letter/notice of December 17, 1992.
The SEQRA process has been completed in this matter. A negative
declaration was made by the Town Trustees. Moreover, the time for
the Planning Board to act has long ago expired since this site plan
application has been pending for nearly six months.
Instead of beginning the SEQRA process on November 23rd, I
request that you begin or continue with your site plan approval
process so this application may be approved and the applicant may
begin construction at the site.
Very truly yours,
Charles R. Cudd/]
CRC:ejc
CC:
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Board of Appeals
John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees
Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector
Harvey Arnoff, Town Attorney
Linda S. Taggart
Merlon Wiggin
GHA. RLE$ R. GUDDY
180 OLD 0OUNTHY HOAD (RTE,
RIVF. Rr~J~AD, NY 11~)0!
December 8, 1992
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman and Board Members
Town of Southold Planning Board
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Re:
Proposed site plan for Linda Taggart
Main Road, Greenport
Zoning District: Light Industrial (LI)
SCTM# 1000-53-2-2
Dear Mr. Orlowski and Board Members:
I am in receipt of a copy of your letter dated December 2,
1992 directed to Merlon Wiggin with reference to the Taggart site
plan. While many of the items enumerated are technical in nature
and can be added to the plan without entirely changing it, it
appears to me that item number 1 requires a significant change of
the configuration of the plan. It is undoubtedly within your
jurisdiction to waive the 25 foot front yard landscape strip,
particularly where the parcel is relatively small. More
importantly you had this plan before you for six months and when I
appeared at your last meeting you indicated that we should proceed
to obtain Health Department certification and certification from
the Building Department.
Under the circumstances, it is difficult to believe that in
six months no member of the staff of the Planning Department
reviewed this plan. Your direction to proceed with certification
from the above departments was without condition and both the
applicant and I understood that the plan as submitted met with your
approval. All of the work necessary to submit the plan to the
Health Department was completed and then your letter of December
2nd indicated that the plan was to be rearranged.
Having made a determination that the plan should be sent to
the Health Department, I ask that you now abide by that
determination, or else explain in detail why the Board directs an
applicant to proceed in one fashion and then countermands its
direction without even discussing the matter with the applicant.
If this latter situation is adopted then someone also should
Chairman, Planning Board of Appeals
Town of Southold
December 8, 1992
Page 2
explain why the Planning staff did not review this application for
more than six months and did not make it abundantly clear at a
public meeting that it had not done so (undoubtedly the Board
assumed that it had been reviewed since it made a determination to
proceed with the Health Department certification). This has made
additional expense, loss of time and aggravation for the applicant.
The situation could be promptly remedied by the Board's waiving or
modifying the front yard landscaping requirement.
I would be pleased to hear further from you with respect to
this matter.
Very truly yours,
Charles R. Cuddy ~
CRC:ejc
CC:
Harvey A. Arnoff, Esq., Town Attorney
John M. Bredemeyer, III, President, Board of Trustees.3
Kenneth L. Edwards
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Board of Appeals
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector
Mark S. McDonald
Linda A. Taggart, Applicant
Richard G. Ward
Merlon Wiggin
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham. Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S, McDonald
Kenneth L, Edwards
Telephone 1516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
· ~t~r~ ~[ -,, -'! :" Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York ~ 1971
Fax (5161 765-1823
December 2, 1992
Merlon Wiggin
Peconic Associates, Inc.
One Bootleg Alley
P.O. Box 672
Greenport, NY 11944
R: Proposed site plan for
Linda Taggart
Main Road, Greenport
Zoning District: Light
Industrial (LI)
SCTM# 1000-53-2-2
Dear Mr. Wiggin:
The Planning Board has reviewed the above referenced site
plan dated April 23, 1992. The site plan does no~ contain all
the information required by Article XXV of the Zoning Code,
nor does it conform to the Zoning Code.
The following changes must be made to the site plan before
the Board can proceed:
Rearrangement of parking to accommodate the required
twenty five (25) foot front yard landscaped strip and
five (5) foot landscaped area in front of the building.
2. The type of lighting and wattage shall be shown.
3. A Key map is needed.
4. Dumpster location shall be shown.
Sketch of sign showing color and dimensions and
method of lighting is needed.
6. The percentage of the site devoted to landscaping
shall be shown.
Also, the'plan does not show the berm that is required by
the Trustee permit.
Please submit nine copies of the revised plan.
If you have any questions or require further assistance,
please contact this office.
CC:
Very truly yours,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Board of Appeals
John M. Bredemeyer, III, President, Board of Trustees ~/
Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector
Harvey Arnoff, Town Attorney
Linda S. Taggart, Applicant
Charles R. Cuddy, Attorney for Applicant
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham. Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L Edwards
Telephone 1516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
November i?, 1992
Charles R. Cuddy
Attorney at Law
180 Old Country Road (Route 58)
P.O. Box 11547 Riverhead, NY 11971
SCOff L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Proposed site plan for
Linda Taggart
Main Road, Greenport
Zoning District: Light
Industrial (LI)
SCTM9 1000-53-2-2
Dear Mr. Cudd¥:
This is in response to your letter of November 9, 1992,
requesting the status of the above referenced site plan
application.
The Board is proceeding with the application, and will
start the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) process
at its next meeting on Monday, November 23rd.
If you have any questions or require further assistance,
please contact this office.
cc:
Very truly yours,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Board of Appeals
John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees
Victor .Lessard, Principal Building Inspector
Harvey Arnoff, Town Attorney
Linda S. Taggart
180 OLD ~UNTRY RO~ (~TE. 58)
September 21, 1992
Mr. John M. Bredemeyer, III
President, Town of Southold Trustees
53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re:
Taggart Site Plan
Main Road, Greenport, N.Y.
SCTM 1000-53-2-2
Dear Mr. Bredemeyer:
I represent Linda Taggart who is the owner of the parcel of property at
Main Road in Greenport, New York. A number of months ago she
apparently submitted an application to the Trustees and it is my
understanding that a negative declaration was made by the Trustees in
connection with the SEQRA.
Mrs. Taggart would like to proceed with her site plan and I would
appreciate your promptly forwarding to me a copy of the Board's
resolution. If for any reason the Board has not fully resolved this
matter, would you please telephone me so that we may discuss any
questions you may have.
Very truly yours,
Charles R. Cuddy~//
CRC:ejc
cc: Mrs. Linda Taggart
TRUSTEES
John M. Bredcmeycr, III, President
Alberl J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President
HenQ' E Smith
John B. Tuthill
William G. Albertson
Telephone (516) 765-1892
Fax (516) 765-1823
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOLITHOLD
SUPERVISOR
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
~.E.Q.R.A.
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
NOTICE OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMF~NT
APPLICATION NO. 1000-53-2-2 Chapto
NAME: Linda Taggart Chapt.
DATE: July, 30 1992
97 - Wetlands
37 - Coastal Erosion
RESOLVED that pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation
Law, State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617,
Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold,
notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as Lead
Agency for the action described below, has determined that the
project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
Please take further notice that this declaration should not be
considered a determination made for any other department or agency
which may also have an application pending for the same or similar
project.
A planting survey shall be submitted prior to final approval.
TYPE OF ACTION: ~1;/~,31~'~ /~ /~r,,,';~ ~d
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: to construct a 24' X 33' single story antiqxle
marine and gift shop including access drive and parking as applied
for .
LOCATION:SC~ #1000-53-2-2
REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION:
1. An on site inspection has been conducted by the Board of
Trustees.
2. An environmental assessment, submitted by the applicant and
reviewed and completed by the Board of Trustees, has indicated that
no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur
should the project be implemented as planned.
CC:
CAC
Merlon Wiggin
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Serge Do~en, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Charles R. Cuddy, Esq.
180 Old Country Road
P.O. Box 1547
Riverhead, NY 11901-1547
Re:
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
September 4, 1992
Appl. No. 4116 - Taggart (Recognition of Lot)
Dear Mr. Cuddy:
Please find attached a copy of the Board's determination
rendered in the above matter.
Copies of this determination have also been furnished to
the Building Department and Planning Board for their permanent
records, and to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the Suffolk County
Administrative Code.
Very truly yours,
Linda Kowalski
Enclosure
Copies of Decision to:
Southold Town Building Department
Suffolk County Department of Planning
Southold Town Planning Board
Mr. and Mrs. Thomas Taggart
,<
.
./
%l..Jl:",.O!.~(' C(). IIl'::A!,fll I),::,_ . }l. :5. Fl() .............................
issues/revisions.
\',,',,<_'. Ak t F
client/owner. I
?:()L.?I'i (/).}'), ;~"t,'[',~ I~q 11
project title.
i.;' '7>''~,
l~t.E,
""'"' "'
,)t 't,L , ,:
,::!:[., ),:'.>!
drawing title.
date. scale.
~J , d/'6. q~':! r~