The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1095 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N~W YORK ACTION OF THE ZONING BOAFoD OF ~PPEALS Appeal No. 1095 Dated April 25,1967 William M. Beebe New Suffolk Lane Cutchogue, New York DATE .~aY.. ~.~.,.. 1967 Appellant at a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on. .~'as considered and the action indicated below waa taken, on your ( ) Request for variance due to lack of access to property ( ) Request for a special exoe~tion under the Zoning Ordinance (X) Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) · hursday, May 11, 1967 the appeal 1. SPECIAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that ~ special 'emcsption ( ) be granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article ............... Section ................ Subsection ................. paragraph .............. of the Zoning Ord/nance, and the decision of the ~uildlng Inspector ( ) bi~ reversed ( ) be confirmed because ~9:.30 ~P.M...(E~.D,S,~. ) · ~Upon ~p/~lication of. WiLliam M. Beebe, New Suffolk Lane, ,Cutchogue, New york, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IIIa Section 303, Article X, Section i~)00A, for permission to divide property: Location of pr_gperty: ~w,est side...N.e..w~ Suff.o_lk.RQa~, ~utchogue, New ]~ork, "B" Business District, bgunde,d' north by~R..¢~ Chur,ch,- Willi,.a~s, .east_by .New Suffolk Road~, south by. Finkle~ ~we~t by CQ.ngrega~tiona! Society. 2, VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board It was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (won/d) (would not) preeduce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship SEE REVERSE (b) The hardship created (is) (i~ not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because SEE REVERSE (c) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) (~ould not) change the character of the district because SEE REVERSE and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( ) be denied and that the previous decisions of the Bnilding Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed. PORM ZB4 APPROVED ~--~ --~ ZONING BOkRD OP APPEALS ~ · ~7~ffp~~rbara C. Dit~a~ ~cretary After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant ~wishes ko divide property and set off a right of way to property in the rear. The two existing residences will have equal frontage on New Suffolk Road. The right of way set off is for the business property located in the rear. The Board f/nds that this division will not change the character of the neighborhood. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance, will produce practical difficulties or unecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all prope~ties alike in the immediate vicinty of this propertyand in the sameuse district and the-var~ahce-doe~ observe the spirit~of the Ordinance and, will not change the character of ,the district~- ~Thereforew it was RESOLVED t~at William Beebe, New'Suffolk Lane, Cutchogue,-New York, be granted permission to divide property, as applied for on proPertY located on the west side New Suffolk Road, CutchOgUel New York. GRE~NPoIrr, lq. Y., F~DAY, MAY 5, t~m~ce ox ii. rings I~t,~. north_ we~ side ~r'~* ' ~e ~ ~ ~ ~- / ~ ~ ~ ~l~- ~ ~.% .~ ~in- dul° Sworn, ~f~ ~ty, ~ Yorl, p~ ~:~ P~. (E~.T.-, U~n ~P'i ' ' h~~a~Zon g~on of W~ a ~, s Printer and Pubhsherof ~e SUFFOLK ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~e ~w~ s~ Suf~ ~e, ~, ~ew news~er -ublishM ~t Green-orr, in s~id ~ ~ ~ld, New Y~ a ~ ~ ~ ~l~ce, p noti~, ,of which ~e ~e~d is ~ ~rintM the ~o~ ~1~: ~ 1~, for ~on ~ dj-)lished in the ~d Suffolk Weekly Times '/:30 P.M. (.~-~D35.T.), Upon pUcatlon of Ruasell T~bor ~d ~e ~ ~, ~i~e X, ~t, N~ Y~ ~ ~h ~y W. B. ~-V. T. G. W. ~l~, ~t by Platt ~. ~:~ P~. (~.T.), U~ ~- York, ~c ~'a ~q~r St~, ~f- f~ ~t, C~e, New York, lor a ~ e~Oon ~ ~d= (~), f~ ~r~ ~ erst a ~. ~tion of ~: pl~ation of W~r Tere~, ~ew ~York, for ~ ~ ex~ In N~ York, ,~ no~ by W. H. ~-Ter~, e~ by J. Wic~ ~., ~u~ by J. A. ~hffi ~t.- ~be; we~ ~y ~-~r- 8:~ P~. (~.D~.T.,, U~n ~- ~, ~e, N~ York, for a ~e ~, ~tion ~, S~t~n 8, ~ ,~ ~ r~ f~m New York, ~u~ ~h by ~n ~r~e with the ~n~ng ~ m~ue ~1o~: l) one 8:30 P.M. (~T.), ~pon C. ~es, 5~ ~ley Avenue, vide property. Location of prop- e~ty: west side New S~ffolk P~o~d, f~ c~ ~ week~ ~, New York, "B" B~- ' .......................... n~ D~t, ~&d no~h by,ricing on me :'' -[ ~ 0. ~h-W~, ~t by ~ ~fo~ ~ ~ by F~-v ....... ~.. 19~.. ~e, ciety. 9:45 P,M. (E~D.S.T.), Upon ap= pllc~tion of George W. Smith & Sons, Ma~ Street, Southold, New York, ~/o DalMoy, Cedar Park, Soutl~oid, New York, for a ~ Ordinance, Article ILI, Section $01, for ponnisslon to can- str~c~ an addition with i~sulfi- cent fr~n~ yard ~. Location of property: pri~te right of way, S~uiitold, N6v York, lot nun~ber 118 iii Cedar Beach Park S~bdi- vision. 10:00 P.M. (E.DaS.T.), Ut0an pllc~t~ of Irvin~ L. Priae, Jr., Esq., G~, New York, a/c S~uthold ~5ummer Theatre Inc., (~arlton Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, for a variance in ac- corda.nce wtil~ ~ Z.~-,Ing ~ln- ~en'~t,~on to ~ a place of mn~. Loc~tion of property: New York, ,bounded north by Ma/n Road, east by C_~en~o~t Sab., sou~h by railroad, west by! Fleet Lumber, Inc. Any person desiring to be heard on any of t~e above applications should, a~j~ar ~t the time-and place ~bove speclfied. D~,'i~: ~ 2'/, 1767, BY OR- TOWN BOARD OF A~PEALS l~M5 plic~tl~n of Le~ferts P. Esq., S~ui~old, l~ew York, a/c Circe BI~, ~tel ~ia, 73rd St~t ~ Br~dway, New Y~k, New Y~k, and ~yea Weber, ~e wi~ the Zon~ Or~, A~icle X, ~t~n I~A, Article IH, ~ction 303, for ~ion u~ an ~der~ ~rcel of land. ~tion of pr~: ~th N~ S~folk Avenue, New Suffo~, N~ York, ~ ~r[h by New ~f~lk A~e~ue, emit by C. C~e, sou~ by P~nic ~y, west by Eugene ~d, ~u~e, New ~Y~rk a/c J~k C~vke, V~ ~, ~e, N~ York, for a ~ ~ ~a~ ~th Zo~ ~, ~e S~on ~, for ~on W re- ~ors L~e, Cu~ho~e, Ne~ York, ~un~d ~or~ by M. V. ~by ~a~ors Lane. we~ by M. V. Bra~tz. 8:15 P.M. (~.T.), Upon a~- pli6ation ~f Wfl~ Wickham, LAW OFFICES WILLIAM WlCKHAM I~IATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND NEW YORK 11952 516 MA 9-8353 April 25, 1967 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Southold, New York Re~ West side New Suffolk Road, Cutchogue Property of Beebe Holding Corp. Gentlemen: We enclose Appeal for a Variance together with our check for $5.00, to cover filing fee, for your consideration. WW/as encls. Very cordially yours, 0 }~o. .5 ; 0 TOWN OF $OUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR APPEAL NO. / 0 C~ TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. ], ~ W.i..~.~..~.......$,.e..e..b..e., - ,of New Su~.folk Lame ~ CutchO..~me ~ N.Y. For Acco~ame of Appella,nt Street and Number Beebo Holding Co.r,D, eratien ..................................................................................................................... HEREBY APPEAL TO APPLICATION ..................................... ..... ..................... FOR PERMIT WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO of PERMIT TO USE PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY Permit to Bubdivide 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY ~.e~.t..~i~Leo..iN. ew..:~.uf~oik~.~<t~,,.Q.~.c~o.~...!!]~.!:..~si~ess Street Use District on Zoning Map District Map No. Lot No. 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AP~PEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section~ and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordi,nance.) Article III, aec. ~O~; Article X, 8ea. iOOOA 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (X) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordin,a:nce or Zoning Map A VARIANCE due to lack of' access (.State of New York Town Low Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16,Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal ~ (has not) been made With respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request fora variance and was made in Appeal No ................................. Dated REASON FOR APPEAL (X) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 (~) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) is requested for. the reason.that ap~licant.now has a fr~tage of 1Gl. G5 feet en New B~folk Road. The ~ro~erty externals westward ~3.27 feet on the Bomth si~e and 292.~2 feet on the North side. Applicant wishes to sell a strip on the Bomth side of 1~,75 feet to Ha~ah G. Beene, who ~ow omly has a frontage ef 50.75 feet$ te sell the residemce parcel with reduced fromtage of 67.50 feet and retaim a strip on the Bo-arb side for access to the rear ef the premises of 16.80 feet. ~oz~ zBt (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEAL Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATI'ON OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because all the properties involved are zoned "B-Business." If applicant is ~able to subdivide as requested and retain access it would create a hardship since applicant has been ~uable to sell its property as a whole. Conveying a strip~ to Hannah:.G.-,Beebe would even the frontage for the two residences and leave ample space for access to the rear, which will continue to be used for business purposes. 2. The hardshipcreatedliS UNIQUEand isnotshared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity ofthisproperty andinthisuse districtbecause the neighboring residences all have ample frontages a~ do not have the problem of commercial buildings in th<e~ rear. 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DI,STRICT because the district remains the same~ except that the frontages ef the two residences are made equal.. STATE OF NEW YORK ) SS ..... :,..;'..':;,~:?¥~:;.~.,T.;.,..,,~....,; .... ;,.o,Y...d..~ ....... ~...~,..~..,.. Signor e COUN~ OF ~ffolk ) ' - ~illi~ M' .Bee~, ~esi~e~t, Beebo ..... Hold~g Sworn to fh'i's .~ ...... ~5.~.~ ........... : .............. ~gy of ......... ~ril:.,...,,,, 1967