Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSMITH, THORNTON (2)S~'~Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1988 October 30, 1986 Environmental Analysis Unit DEC, Building 40, Room 219 SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794 ./ Gentlemen: Enclosed find a completed Short Environmental Assessment Form and a copy of the map of the subdivision of Thorton E.) Smith located at Mattituck, tax map no. 1000-121-1-1 & plo 19.9. This project is unlisted and an initial determination of nonsignificance has been made. We wish to coordinate this action to confirm our initial determination. May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be received at this office until November 13, 1986. We shall interpret lack of response to mean'there is no objection by your agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and our agency will assume the status of lead agency. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIPOkAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary eric. cc: Department of Health Services 352 NEW & HARRIS, INC. Construction Managers AVENUE N. Y. 10001 - 4983 ./ GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU [] Shop drawings _.J~"Oop¥ of letter / .~.~¢Attiched [] Under separate cover via .Y"-" '" ''~/" ;" the following items: [] Prints [] Plans [] Samples [] Specifications [] Change order [] Contracts [] Schedules [] Sepias COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION - " "''-~/L :';' " ' / /'/ 7 ' ' " ,._ , ,_._- iTHESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: [] For approval [] For your use [] As requested -~EZTor review and comment [] FOR BIDS DUE IREMARKS [] Approved as submitted [] Approved as noted [] Returned for corrections 19 [] Resubmit__ [] Submit ['] Return__ . copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED - " " 'Permit Admznistrator · RE: Freshwater.~Wetlands Determination '~ Suffolk County Tax Map $t000-121.00-01.00-001. 000 ~ Dear Mr. Greene: This is to request pursuant to Section 24-0703(5) of New York State's Freshwater Wetlands Act and the Department's -Regulations, Section 662.~, whether : the property described on Exhibit A annexed hereto has~ been or will be designated a freshwater wet,and subject to regulation. The property is owned by Thornton E. Smith, and this request is made because the property is being subdivided. Very truly yours, Neil H. Smith tint ~n. and THORNTON E. SMITH, pesldt~ at 44 B-~ookstda Ave~'e Plaad~e, New York, , the ~ond l~r't, ~"TH, that the party of the first part, in consideration o£ O~.e IL/Id O0/lO0-~* hw~ul mov~y of the Ur~ted States, arid othe~ good 'and valuable cons!de~ation by che party ot the svc~dd part, does hercby grant and release unto the 9arty of the second par% thc heirs or succ~smrs and a~ns of thc party' ~of the second part fot;cvcr, ALL ti,at certain plot, p~e ,'or p,,r/::t of land, with thc b~ildings and improvements thereon crec:ed, lying' and Weing ~ ~t'Mattltuok~ ~o%~a o~ ~ut,%o~ CIouat;y ot Suffolk State oF I~ew York, bo~tnded and described as follows: BEGINNING' a~ a monument set ia .the northerly ~Ide o£ Sound Avea~ at ~h~ southwest oovn~ et laud now o~ formerly of the Ki~kup Estate~ ~urming thenca along the northerly sld~ of Sound Avenue 'the 2ollowiag ~ou~ courses e~ud d!stanceg: O!° 11~ 20" East 226.~l'feet to a monun$~t; West 208,96 ~eet to a~aon~ont; !) North 72~ 49' 20" We~t 25.07 teet to a mom~m~nt; ' a) South 88~ ,~49~ 'lO" W~st 318.~3 ~eet to a monuments 3) So~tk 85~''56~ ~20~ West 405:!~ ~et ~o a monuaent~~ 4) Nopth 76~ 49~ 40~ We~t 2~.72 ~eet to a monument$ thence No=th thence No~th 85° 48~ 40" th~ce So~th O1~ 11~ 20" ~'..e ~ hr, ~-' ~!ong ~he northeasterly side of So~d 'Aven~ ~he foilo~l~g ~hPee oo~rses 1) No~t~ 66~ 56, ~0" West 204.03 ~) North 63" 04~ 20" West 167.17 3) North. 63° 'p/~, 00-"-.West 1t3.5~ co~e~ fo~ed by ~he Intersect!on o~ the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 4D--SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11794 Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner April 22, 1988 Kuhn, Smith & Harris, Inc. 352 Seventh Avenue New York, NY 10001 Attention: Mr. Neil H. Smith Re: Freshwater Wetlands Determination S.C.T.M. # 1000-121.00-01-001 Dear Mr. Smith: Regional Permit Administrator Robert Greene has referred your letter of April 13, 1988 to this office for review. In order to determine whether or not there are regulated freshwater wetlands on the subject property, we need the following: ~1) Copy of survey or tax map of property. 2) Copy of map showing exact location of property. Thank you for your cooperation. MES:ki Sincerely, Martin E. Shea Fish and Wildlife Technician Frank A. Kujawski, Jr., Pres. HENRY P SMITH JOHN M. BREOEMEYER, III J, ohn Bednoski, "Jr. ALBERT BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town HaH, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southo~d, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 TO: FROM: DATE: 'Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Town Trustees ~ April 28, 1988 As per your request, pleaSe be advised of the Trustees findings regarding the following applications: /FRANKLINVILLE HOMES - 1000-125-2-2.2 - Trustees found no ~-evidence of wetlands - no jurisdiction. sTYpE BROTHERS AGENCY - Trustees determined they have no jurisdiction. "/THORTON SMITH -1000-121-1-t-,p/019 - The Trustees found a pond on the site. There is to be no grading on the top of -the slope to the pond. ~DB.M COMPANY - 1000-55-6-15.1 - Trustees are to contact the C.A.C. after it is staked for inspection. /~C©VE BEACH ESTATES - 1000-22-3-18.3 - New access appears to be far enough away from the wetlands. JJOSEPH GAZZA - 1000-22-3- (19-22) 35-5-1.2 - Trustees will refer this mat~%~_~,., the C.A.C. for recommendations. KUHN, SMITH g HARRIS. INC. BUILDING'CONTRACTORS 8, cONSTRUCTION-MANAGERS "'-':.: ' :-(.? 'Established 1921 '"-',':,.-:'-2 . . ....... ¢ 'SEVENTH AVENUE, NEW YORK, N.Y. 818) 564-4983 WiLDLiFE :~'ECHNICIAN ~ ":% "' e~m' n "~_ SUt~Dy'.Z?Buiid'i'~'-'~40 ~ ':'.,- .. .,. , .. ~rook ~ ...New Yor~ - Z~.7,~ - . -/.~;-:.. -. ;~.~:-~:-.;::;-~',..:.'-: . .: . .. · : . ~,:. · :, ,...~:4 ';"L: -'. ' ':- '~' -;' '~' "'~'%7~.J~.... 4'~¢'~::&72;;:,~,."~'i~~ - ,:., : .' .. . , ~,:. .', ":":~. '-'. ' :~-~ t~ ''/''' :-,J:'[:~:?'~?"'[ '~'~??'"': ''~''~ ~:/' ;: For Corredion & Resubmission "'.[: " 'Me~en'ge~ .?..E2:.2..:.....12.].For':" ' Final Approval As requested in your letter dated April.~22, 1988r REMARKS Copy of Survey aod copy of t, iap sb.o~,.~ing exact location, Very truly yours, KUHN, SMITH & HARRIS, INC. -- ... ; ,.<.~.~ /4 . , ,,:. ..... ,., .r/ . - ~, ....... ''- ..'.' ~' ~ -, ~,/. '" .-'-~.'4,, z ' . -'~ ,.- ? ,' i" - ,'x/J/"~ ,'- ~....' '/,x../ '~. '~ BY: .... ', ........ , .X~./~'CAPTAIN KID :: ESTATt~$ 19 OP. EGON 11935 MA ITUC/~ LAUI~EL 94~ FRANK A. KUJ~WSKI, JR., President *ALBERT J.'KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. ~3REDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH · . BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 May 9, 1988 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Steven Sanford Senior Wildlife Biologist New York State D.E.C. Bldg. 40, SUNY Stony Brook, New York 11794 Re: Thornton Smith - Major Subdivision 1000-121-1-1,p/019 Dear Mr. Sanford: The Southold Town Trustees request inclusion of the kettle holes located at "Drainage Area A", "Drainage Area B", and Open Space Area A", on the enclosed Young & Young Preliminary Subdivision Map dated and revised October 27, 1987 on behalf of Thornton E. Smith at Mattituck, in the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Tentative Freshwater Wetlands Maps. Your consideration, of this request, will be greatly appreciated. ~ry truly yours/~ . Frank A. ' K~j awski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees FAK:ip Attachments cc: Planning Board~ Thornton Smith file FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J.'KRUPSKI, JR., Vice*President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH '- TELEPHONE (53.6) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 I AY 1 0 i988 May 9, 1988 ~5~ YORK, ~J. Mrs. Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Town of Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Thornton Smith - Major Subdivision 1000-121-1-1,p/019 Dear Valerie: The Town Trustees suggest that your good office refer the above referenced project to the Conservation Advisory Council and the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Office of Ecology for review of this project. The Town Trustees and the Conservation Advisory council may wish to comment on the road drainage despoiling the Kettleholes. Should you have any questions', please contact this office. Fra~nkrY truly yours,f President Board of Town Trustees FAK:ip ~ review, has been =de o~ your proposal to: JP6,~n",,~d -7";'-/~ /7d~/~-/f~Z~*~ The l~ew York State Department of Environmental Conservation has determined that the above project is: e than 100' from Freshwater Wetlands. __ ..The ?resh~:ater ~'Tet!ands present are tentatively mapped as less than 12.4 acres and have not been desi.--..nated by the State as having unusual local importance at this time so are not currently regulated by ~!YSDEC. __ ~.e wetlands present are Tidal and it appears that you need to apply for a Tidal Wetland Pe~it. ~erefore, no pe~it under Artiste 24 (~reshwater Yetlands) of the Enviro~tat Conse~ation Law is required. ~t~ate Pe~it Administrator CTE: DDt.; co ' s SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PaTriCk Gl HAIPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE May 12, 1988 '1 1988 STANLEY A. PAUZER DISTRICT MANAGER Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town of S0uthold Southold, New York 119~1 Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request our office has reviewed the preliminary map for the THORNTON SMITH major subdivision and have several comments regarding the proposed plan. Specific concerns include: estimated storm water surface runoff, dissipation of stored runoff water, soil erosion from steep slopes and excessive cuts or fills from road grades. Storm water surface runoff calculations were based on a 6 inch rainfall. This would seem adequate in'this situation and represents a design storm of a 25 year return frequency. However,'a coefficient of runoff of 0.25 was used for the entire watershed in both drainage areas. This proposed major subdivision is located on predominantly Haven, Riverhead, Plymouth, and Carver and Plymouth soils (see attached soil map and descriptions). Haven and Riverhead soils are in hydrologic Soil Group B whereas Plymouth and Carver and Plymouth soils ars in hydrologic Soil Group A. Hydrologic soil' groups indicate the minimum rate of infiltration obtained for bare soil and transmission rates of the soils. Group A soils have substantially greater infiltration and trans- mission rates than Group B soils. This results in greater surface runoff on Group B soils. Therefore, the coefficient of runoff should be differentiated according to soil type, among other factors. Based upon a 6 inch design storm, the 0.25 coefficient for the proposed land use represents 1.5 inches of surface runoff water. Applying the soil cover complex method of calculating storm water runoff developed by the U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, the same land use would produce 1.44 and 2.26 inches of-runoff on hydro- logic Soil Groups A and B, respectively. Consequently, use of 0.25 as a coefficient of runoff for the proposed land use on hydrologic Group A soils agrees with the estimated runoff using the S.C.S. method; however, there would be a 66 percent difference in runoff calculations on Group B soils. PECONIC PLAZA OLD COUNTRY ROAD, ROUTE 58 RIVERHIEAIra, NEW YORK 11901 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. - 2 - May 2, 1988 Stor~ water surface runoff calculations for drainage area 'A', which consists of~66 percent Group B soils, was estimated at 433,500 cubic feet of water.' The plan estimated 287,000 cubic feet of water. This difference could obviously affect the required volume of .storm water storage within a storage structure. _ In this subdivision, storm water surface runoff is proposed to be stored in "kettle hole" depressions located on the wooded portion of the property. Es- timates of existing storage volumes in the depressions indicate that there would be suffficient volume to store all of the surface runoff from the design storm. Even in drainage area 'A', with the calculated greater amount of runoff water, the existing depression has adequate capacity. The high water mark would be increased from the reported elevation of 28 to approximately 30. There should b~ concern, however, regarding the infiltration and discharge of storm water from within the depression. A soil boring in the bottom of drainage area 'B' found from 0-6 inch~s depth, silt loam; 6-12 inches, loamy sand; 12-32 inches, silt; 32-38 inches, organic matter and silt; and 38-60 inches, fine silt loam. In addition, ground water was found approximately 6 inches below the ground surface. In drainage area 'A' the bottomof the depression contained water on the ground surface which was approximately 12-18 inches deep. A soil boring approximately 4 feet above the water elevation found from 0-48 inches below the surface, sandy loam, and 48-50 inches, fine sandy loam. Due to the presence of surface water, shallow ground water and fine to medium textured soils in the bottom of the depressions, infiltration and percolation rates would be expected to be very slow. Development of the property will in- crease the volume of water and sedimentation entering the depressions. The effectiveness of the depressions as outlet structures or recharge areas for storm water runoff is questionable. Considerable documentation regarding soil profiles and infiltration rates should be evaluated by a professional engineer and a determination made. The remaining concerns regarding the proposed subdivision involve soil erosion. Most obvious are potential soil erosion problems on lots with steep slopes such as Lots 1, 24, 25, 33, 34 and 35. These lots have slopes ranging from 12 to 24 percent. During development of the lots, special precautions should be required to reduce soil erosion. Recommendations are available from this office upon re- quest. A potential soil erosion problem could also arise from excessive cuts or fills from road grades. Road 'A' at Stations 3+00, 24+50 and 31+00 have proposed road cuts of 4.5 to 5.0 feet while Stations 6+00 and 30+00 have proposed road fills of 3-4.5 feet. These cuts and fills could cause steep road banks which may be- come an erosion problem if not graded and vegetated adequately. In addition, deep cuts on Plymouth and Carver and Plymouth soils will expose their very coarse sand and gravel subsoils. Stability of these subsoils for road banks is poor. I hope this information will be useful to you. iIf you require any additional information, please contact our office. Sincerely, . -= Thomas J. McMahon, Senior District Technician At t achment s SHEET NUMBER 16 24~ ~OFE~ 'RdB RdC HaB ..' .~AVE'N SO~LS (HaA. I,, H~B' HaC, "H~en soils ~re deep, well-drained~'medium-textured soils that formed In'a loamy or silty layer over stratified coarse sand and gravel. The texture from 0 - 19 inches is loam, silt loam, and very fine sandy loam. From 19 - 28 inches the range is silt loam, very fine sandy loam', and gravelly loam, while the texture from 28 - 55 inches'is gravelly sand, loamy Sand, sandy loam or stratified sand and gravel. The permeability is moderate in the root zone (surface · layer and subsoil) and rapid or ve.=y rapid in the underlying 'layer. These soil~ have'moderate to high ~vaflable moisture capacities (see at~ached ~able). Haven soils have 10w organic matter Content and low . natural supply of plan~ nutrients, but crops r~spond well to 'lime and fertilizer. When the soils are int~nsively cultivated likelih6od of crusting is great~ however the returning of cover Crop residue decrease~ ~his problem. Generally, these soils are well suited'to crops commonly .grown in .Suffolk County. HaA ~aven loam? 0 - 2 percent slope:~. These soils are usually large in area and nearly level with some areas of slight undulation. The erosion hazard of these soils is slight but erosion problems are likely to occur in undulating areas. Irrigation water should be applied at a moderate rate. Management concerns in- clude crusting after rain, maintaining tilth, and reduction of the plow pan. HaB Hav~n loam~ 2 - 6 percent slopes. CARVER .and PLYMOUTH SANDS (CPA, CpC, CpE) These soils are deep, excessively drained and coarse-textured. Soils in these units can be made up entirely of Carver sand~ entirely of Plymouth sand, Or Of a combination of the two soils. The texture of the Carver soils is fine sand and coarse sand 0 - 22 inches. Coarse sand and gravelly sand is found 22 - 60 inches. The PlYmouth soils have textures of fine sand and sand 0 - 27 inches. The permeability of these soils is rapid or very rapid. Available.moisture holding capacities are low to. very low. Natural fertility and organic matter content of Carver and Plymouth soils is low. The crop response to lime and fertilizer applications is fair. tf fertilizer is applied~ frequent applications of small amounts should be made to reduce nutrient loss by leacking. These soils are not well suited to crops commonly grown in Suffolk ~ounty. They are too droughty, too steep~ too stony or too sandy for crops, pasture or nursery stock. These sandy soils severely limit installation and maintenance of lawns %nd land- scape shrubs. A permanent cove~ of plants should be maintained 'or restored on all soils in this unit to reduce erosion. CpE Carver and Plymouth sands~ 15 to 35 percent slo~es. These soils are almost exclusively on moraines excapt'fo~ a few'steep areas on side slopes along some drainage channels. The gravel content of these soils is up to 15 percent more gravel, by volume, than the representative soils. On some moraines the gravel content can be as much as 30 percent, and can contain a few cobblestones. Erosion hazards of these soils is'moderate to severe. A permanent cover of plants should be maintained or restored on these soils. Riverhead soils are deep, wall drained, moderately coarse-textured soils that~ formed in a layer of dandy loam or fine sandy, loam over thick layers of coarse sand and gravel. The texture from 0 - 32 inches is sandy loam and fine sandy loam. Sand, loamy sand, gravelly sand and gravelly loamy sand is found at depths of 32 ' 65 inches. _The p'ermeabiiity is modera~ely r. apid' in the root zone (surface layer and subsoil) and very rapid in the underlaying layer. Riverhead soils' have moderate to 'high available moisture capacities (sea attached table). Natural inter'al drainage is good, but in many places where these soils have been farmed a plowpan has formed. These soils have Iow organic matter contents and low natural supply of plant nutrients, but crops respond well ko lime and fertilizer. 'GenerallY~ these soils are well suited to c?ops commonly grown in Suffolk County. ~ RdB Riverhead sandy loamy 3 - 8 percent slopes. Most small deposits of this soil have moderately short slopes, but large areas ara undulating. Cultivated areas are 2 - 3 inches shallower to coarse sand and gravel than the representative Riverhead soil because of past erosion. The erosion hazard is slight to moderate.' Keeping cover crops on the soil in winter and returnzng crop residue will help to pro- tect exposed areas f~om erosion. Diverting runoff water from higher areas also helps to reduce erosion damage. Irrigation water can be applied at a moderate rate. ~.lymouth SoYis ('PLA, P1B, P1C, PmB3, PsA, PsB) Plymou~_h soils consist of deep, excessively drained, coarse-textured soils that formed in a layer of loamy, sand or sand over thick layers of stratified coarse sand and gravel. The texture 'of Plymouth soils plA, PtB, P1C, PmB3 and PmC3 from 0 - 27 inches is 'loamy sand, loamy fine sand, gravelly loamy sand and sand. From 27 - 58 inches the texture is sand and gravel, coarse sand and gravelly coarse sand. The permeability of these soils is rapid. Available moisture capacity of these soils ranges from low to very low (see attached table). These soils are droughty during periods~of low rainfall. Unless irrigation water is applied, deep-rooted crops are better suited. Irrigation~water can be applied at a rapid rate but frequent, small appli- cations should be made to reduce the amount lost to downward movement. The organic matter content and natural fertility of ghese soils is low. Crop response to lime and fertilizer is fair. Maintenance of fertility is difficult because of the sandy texture. Frequent applications of small amounts of ferti- lizer should be made ~o reduce nutrient loss by leaching. The sandy surface layer reduces the suitability of these soils for nursery stock. Because of the above limitations, these soils are only fairly wellJsuited to crops commonly grown in' Suffolk County. ~iC Plymouth lom~y sand: 8 - 15 percent slope~. This soil is found on rolling terrain or on short side slopes. The texture is ~imila~ to that'_described-as~-representative for r_hi series except that ' in places it is a few inches shallower to coarse sand and gravel and con- tains as much as 15 percent gravel. The hazard of erosion is moderate to severe because of the slope and sandy texture. A cropping system that in- cludes several years of close growing crops is necessary to provide adequate protection from erosion. Farming on the countour and~ where practical~ diversions are practices that will help control erosion. Where such prac- tices are not used~ this soil should be protected by permanent cover. This soil is not well suited to crops commonly grown in the County because of slopes and droughtines~. ProC3 .Plymouth gravelly loamy sand. 8 - 15 percent slopes, eroded. The areas of this soil are usually small and slopes are short and uniform. This soil is shallower to loosg sand and gravel than the representative Plymouth soil because of past erosion. The upper layer is only 10 - 12 inches thick. Soil material in this layer is 15 - 35 percent gravels by volume: because of the loss of finer ~oil particles. All the surface soil and much of the subsoil has been lost through erosion. The hazard ' of further erosion is moderate to severe. Crops show signs of severe moisture deficiency after short periods of dry weather. This soil is not suited to crops commonly grown in the County because of Past erosion damage and extreme droughtiness. A permanent cover of plants should be maintained or restored on this soil. Southold, N.Y. 11971 '(516) 765-19~8 May 27, 1988 Neil Smith 352 Seventh Avenue New York, NY 10001 RE: Thornton Smith SCTM ~1000-121-~1.p/o19 Dear Mr. Smith: "Enclosed please find a review of the above mentioned subdivision done by the Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District. As per the Town Trustee's suggestion, we have also asked for comments from the Conservation Advisory Council and the Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services, office of Ecology. If you have any questions, Please do not hesitate to contact this office. Enc: jt CHAIRMAN NeTM York State Department of Environmental Conservation -..-, .- 'l ~nco ~ Building 4p--SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11794 , /~[J[~ !'j - t~o~ ~ (5]g~) 751-7900 NE~] }'ORn; rl,Y. !UOOZ ~ ~ul~ 28, ]988 Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner Kuhn, Smith & Harris, Inc. 352 Seventh Ave. New York, NY 10001 Attn: Neil H. Smith Re: DEC No. 10-88-0963 SCTM No. 1000-121-1-1 Property of Thorton Eo Smith Dear Mr. Smith: I refer to the letter you recently received from Mr. Alfred T. Ketlar, Alternate Permit Administrator, indicating that the referenced property was more than 100 feet from the Freshwater Wetlands. In early May, 1988, the Town of Southampton Trustees informed us that small wetlands are present on the property in question. A field inspection by Depart- ment staff has verified this and that they are of "unusual local importance" in that they provide breeding habitat and related benefits to wildlife. Con- sequently, these wetlands are being added to the final Suffolk County Freshwater Wetlands Maps and, as such, are now regulated by the Department. Although sub- division of the property, per se, is not a regulated activity under the Freshwater Wetlands Act, any construction or development of this property is regulated and will require approval by the Department. For information on the precise locations and boundaries of these wetlands, please contact Dr. Frank M.. Panek, Regional Supervisor of Natural Resources, at the above address. Pursuant to 6NYCRR 621.(2)(4), the Department may reverse itself on a prior decision on t~e basis of newly discovered information. The recent physical confirmation that wetlands exist on the property of Thorton B. Smith is consistent with this and, accordingly, I hereby revoke Mr. Kellar's letter. I sincerely regret any inconvenience our~earlier determination that no Freshwater Wetlands permit would be required may have caused you. Very truly yours, Robert A..Greene Regional Permit Administrator Region I RAG:j f cc: H. Berger F. Panek S. Sanford M. Shea Chairman, Town of Southampton Planning Board file . -=nt of?~ EnVironmental - Conserva~'io "' ':"-}-:'-':.. ~ SuPervisor-'ofl Natural Resources RE: DEC NO. 10-88-0963 ,.~ ~. SCTM No. 1000-121-1-1-~[~''-'';~' · .~ - '- Property of Thornton E~;. Smith~ Dear:Mr. Panek .... ':'" Enciosed is a copy 'of Robert ~e's JulY?28; 1988 .... correspondence regarding the above referenced matter. -~ Mr.' Greene indicated'that you would be able tO 'provide precise locations and boundaries regarding this ~att~r~ within order to advance as quickly as ~ossible further planning regards to this site, I would appreciate receiving this .. information at the earliest possible date. In the interim, I will be in contact with you for the purpose-to trying to determine approximate boundaries so that some planning may begin based upoh that information. Very truly yours, Neit H. Smitt~ ~HS/nm NOTE: 56.8 KEY MAP SCALE I"= 600' 54 8 55.5 CLUSTER CALcuLATIoN x TOTAL AREA = 88.098 ACRES LESS AREA CONVEYED TO SIMIcICH =7.4834 ACRES NET AREA= 80.6146 80.6146 x 43560 x 0.80 + 80000 = 35 LOTS 52 3 x \ \ x SITE DATA: I. AREA-88.0980 ACREs 2. ZONING USE DIsTRIcT - A RESIDENTIAL- AGRIcuLTuRAL NO. OF LOTS- :35 4. LENGTH OF ROAD -4180 +-L.E 5. TOTAL AREA OPEN SPACE =38.2+-AC. 55.8 X x 54.5 52.3 X EXIcJTI Iq6 crATe; H f~A~,"J I M TOPoGRAPHIc MAP PREPARED BY LOCKwoOD, KEssLER & BARTLETT, INC. SYOssET NEW YORK rD THIS SURVEY IS A VIoLATIoN OF SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDucATIoN LAW. COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT 8EARINC rile LANO SU,<VEYoR'S INKED SEAL OR ;.MBOsS[D Si:AL SHALL NOT 8£ CONsIDER[C; fO BE A VALID Jg, UE COPY ..~UARANTEt% tl'ff)ICATPD HEREON sHALL RUN ONLY TO [HE Pt\SON FOR WHOM [HE SURVI: IS PRE~AxI:D, A;.D ON HIS ~EHALF I'D [HE FITLE COMPANY, GOVERN,MEN[AL AGENCY ANL .ENDING INS]lIEu[lOIN LbS[ED HeRr. ON, AND ro THt ASSIG;-~EES OF file I.ENDING INSTI- i'UTION. GUARANIEES AC, E NO[ [~A;iSFERABL[ fO ADDITIONAL INSTITUTIONS OR SIJB¢~O~,~,'WI L.~(8 9697-1-70 7 TE~OT HOL[ M0.1 ~LAY~ C~l LT~'~ PA1 ~- 8, RO WI',J 0.0 \ \ -1 518 .512 F 47.1 oD 44oOO $'~' 502 x TEcoT HOL~ hJO. 2 HUMI~ ® ~ooo ~ 5~ 5 PAL~ lb 5. 51 I00 0 I00 200 300 400 SCALE I" = I00' CONTouR )'NTERvA L 2' o.o o. 5 4.2 8.0 L 42.1 × // 382 X 395 39.0 0¢ x35. 0 ~0 S.E .5 < 485 /,? ,.E ,/ 38.3 .¸5 40 ~ ',20 '/ · ,~,?,. 0 J 500 FEET i o P '¢4 .~.~M ff ~ O. 345 38.7 190 /- / (~ o.~. 145 M.H. .O8 398 0."{00°//' 24 5 PROPosED REALIGNMENT OF SOUND AVENUE I I. DATUM' IS ME'AN SEA LEVEL. ~. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP NO. DIST. I000 SECT. 1'2!. BL.O_J LOTS OI I~ P/O 19.9-- PREPANEO BY PHoToGRAI~METRIc METHODS DATED' NOV. ~6, 1969 x .. NOTEs TOPOGRAPHIC MAP FROM PHoToGRAPHY \ \ k H. 30.8 X Oi~ 27, 1987 M 1987 15, N3V. 11~1986 REVISED: S~986 , .I 38 37.0 X \ \ \\ ,W° , 0q ~ xO° ,,(.~ 0,(.°!° ' <~.o?°°'1' ,, 0.¢'f' . , 0~ xf~ 1 83000 $.F. '~e."' . ' PRELIMINARY PREPARED FOR SUBDIVISION MAP THoRNToN E. SMITH AT MATTITucK RECEIVED. OEC 0 8 198' TOWN OF SOuTHoLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. . L. I ' · .DSCA~E. SIF'~ N.Y.S. RE., L.S. LIc. NO. I2845 KU ,$MITU _, , .. 56.8 ', 558 54 8 558 L~ \ ION 55.5 X = 88.098 ACRES CONVEYED TO SIMIcICH = 7.4834 ACRES = 80.6146 43560 x 0.80 .-" 80000 = .'55 LOTS 9. ;.0980 ACREs SE DIsTRIcT - A RESIDENTIAL - AGRIcuLTuRAL - :35 ROAD -4180 +-L.F. OPEN SPACE =38.2'-AC. \ \ \ x 5,~.5 52 3 × 55.8 X \ \ \ \ \ 52.3 X 518 52 5 ~o~ t 5!2 5 I~. I::: X I ('"JT I M G ~'AT6 H '-5 TOPoGRAPHIc MAP . PREPARED BY WOOD, KEssLER & BARTLETT, INC. SYOssET NEW YORK fO THIS SURVEY I. A VIoLATIoN Of SECTION 7209 OF file NEW YORK sTATE EDucATIoN LAW COPIES Of THIS SURVEY MaP NOT 8EARINC tHE LA~D SUi, VEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR ' ;.MBOsS[D SEAL SHALL NOT B£ CONsIDERE{:: I'O BE A VALID LRUE COPY ,]uARAF4EES INOIcAT~D HEREON sHALL RUN ONLY TO [HE Pt\SON FOR WHOM rile SURVE IS PRExAkLD, A,,D ON HIS ~HALF rifle COMPANY, GOV[RHMENfAL AGENCY I.ENDING INStITuTION LISTED HEREON, AND rO TH[ ASSIG~4EES Of file LENDING INSTI- tUTION. GUARAF, I~ES A:~[ NOT [RANsFERABL[ ro ADDITIONAL INSTITUTIONS O~ .... -- ~ ...... iii[iii _~ IL '[[ [[ [[[ [ [ ~.D. Mo. 7 TO.= SY, 2G I.E.~ -< ,&' *o. 6oo% t ~.p. ® 0.400 I.zoo % PI = 58.69 AdT~ 58.48 AA.~ I.E.~ Hf + + ~r + 28.80 49 ¢08o' o F= ,+ -I ~XIOTIMG I.E.--SO. ¢.t~. MO. T d.=S4. I. ~.--'50. I=' K: 0 F I L E HO1~17_: Iu = 60~ VE~T: I" = I0' 'D PI = 54. O0 Voc= + O. 16 54'.15 i +1. + + + + + + + + + + L9 ~ tg ts ts I'-- h- % oo o~ 557'. W.D. MO.E T6. = SS. SS I.E.= 20. S5 N g4" G.M.ti'. @ I gXlrOTIMO (A4A I M-I'A I NI o. 500 % N td I. 6ovE AA.H, 'A' I.E.= 28.08 IVEF. PIPE .,,. J,. i° 'OFI Lg + 4 + I HO~IZ: I'= 50 VEg-T' I" = I0' N I I I.E. = 21.00 IPI A ! M AG E- IP~'AIMAG~ AgEA 'A' = A = TI~IDLJTAI~'f" AIEEA = 2:29:5000 ¢.F. = ~" RAIMFALL = 0.5 = woEPg oF glJMOFF = 280875 d.?. TOTAL V¢Lbliv\E REd~/-/IgElP =' 287000 6.15. ! [:PI<AlldA6E AF-.EA 6 =ALEE; = Tgi IbUTARY A~EA = ~0:5'000 ¢O.F = Co" Ii~AIkIFALL = 0.~ = ~O~FF. ~ ~UKIOFF = o.~5 ~;05000 co.~. x 0.6 x 0.~5 = 'TSd~25 TOTAL VOLUME TOTAL VOLLIN~E: PIgOV'IDElP = I01000 ~.E ~ATcSH [5A~.~IMO ALL dA-FdH i~AC-'glM('9 TO dSOMCOICO'T OF F:'~E~'ACOT 4-":4. I~OX WITH ¢ONd~ETE ~I_AD I. FgAME & ORATE. ./ /'/ // // '5 I' · j ./ // / / 2 ///// / I / / I / / / ti J I / I / / I I i / // { I /~' / ,/// ,') A I I I ~ --'~/ / . o4" / / ,/ , ,,,.q / / />.(..39-' gV-' , / / / os ,,x,.¢.¢'''' / ./ / / / / / / / / / / / / / //1" I~ /'~'/ \ / // / / \ / /i / .,? // 0¢ \ / ' .~o- .,,,,;,' _,'/,, ,, ,.<x " -' S'~ .'/ / /./.01"~ 0u '- .... / / // / 'O,/,~/ '/- // .- ,/ //~/ // /// \.'~' I x ,~,,A'"' /' ..- / / / / [ '- -" ""'" J / / / I ~ / // q,,%' - 1 .... '~ / .., --- / \ \ / .., j '"' ,// / / ~" \....~~ .....--' ~ ..,q/u j--' ,../ .. ~'i- '- -- "' -" -. '~-" \ -- - olo / ... /.' '~ -~ "'-. % A.. (J' ..-il/ ."' l /' ,."' ........ x ,,o?5"" ., X / /// , ""..,"" \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ '" ., / -' oo I I \ \ '"/ // / I \ % / / I / / / ~ / //// / .// / / / / / \ \ x .. ~-" / IPI~A I MAOE N / / / · \ % / / / / " , / ~/ / '' Lot -~ ._ .~ ~ _ _~ / ii// X/ / / // t I / \ I / / I I .... ' ' ' PgTAIL I iI / / / ,~ / I / - IPgAI MAGE I.~. = 15.$4- ¢O'OF 254.':d.M.g ~ lea. O0~ g~ I / / / / / \ iI / / ,,~/ x i II i //// , I / / % "/ / I I / / i / ~ Ox / /// / / I ii ii fO0 / / xx\ / / / I I I ii it / ? Q% '" I / I ~ \ \ Iii I I ~ / .,N x, I I/ "' // I / / ~ " "'"x'~-. / / I / / '-., / I I I / i / / 28'OF 18" d.M.~. ~ 0.~00% AE gA o'.)6A L g ' I" = I.E. = I 9.'~,,4.. .... 12- ....... 14 X7,5 EXICOTIMO ~OMTOU I~- p E~O POCO E i~ ~50NITOblI~ EXIrOTIMG Ol°OT ELEV. PRELIMINARY PREPARED FOR THoRNToN AT MATTITUCK TOWN OF SUFFOLK SUBDIVISION E. SMITH SOUTHoLD COUNTY, N.Y DATE: OCT. 27, 1987 NO. 85-1194 MAP YOUNG 400 OSTRAN~)ER AVE., RIVERHEAD, N.Y. ALDEN W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. P.E. E~ L.S. LIC. NO. 12845 HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L,S. LIC. NO. 45B95 i i OPHEET :5 Of: :5 8::5007