HomeMy WebLinkAbout1201
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N~V YOI~K
A~T~0N OF ~ ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL~
Appeal No. 1201 Dated August 12, 1968
ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Robert A. & Phyllis A, Graeb
To Woodcliff Drive
Mattituck, New York 11952
Appellant
at a meeting of the Zonin~ Board of Appeals on Septel~ber 5s 1968
was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your
(X) Request for variance due to lack of access to property
( ) Request for a special exception under th? Zoning Ordinance
(X) Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance
( )
the appeal
1. SPECIAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a ~)ecial exception ( ) be
granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article .................... Section ................... Subsection .................... paragraph
.................... of the Zoning Ordinance, and the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) be
confirmed because 7:30 ~,M, (E.D.S,To) ~ Upo~ application ~f Robert A.
and Phyllis A. Gra. eb, Woodcliff Drive~ Mattituck~ New Yorks for
permission to divide lots and for approval ~f access to two lots
in accordance with the State ?f, New York Town Laws Section 280A°
Location ~f property: private road ~ff east side Ole Jule Lane,
Mattituck~ New York~ bounded north by private ,right of way, east
by private right of way~ south by Schiller ar~ Zebroskls west by
Staron°
2. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that
(aS. Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) produce
hardship because
SEE RBVERSE
practical difficulties or unnecessary
(b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because
REVERSE
(cS The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) (would not)
change the character of the district because
and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( ) be denied
and that the previous decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed.
FORM ZB4
'l~rbara Co Dittm~nns Secretary
After ~nvestig.ation ~ ~nspection the B~a~d finds that the
applicants request ~ermission to divide property and obtain approval
of access. The Board approves access from Ole Jule Lane east to
the north east corner of the applicantts property. The findings
of the Board are that the applicant proposes to divide one lot into
two lotss both of which meet the minimum requirements of the Southold
Town BuildingZone Ordinance. The Board finds that the problem of
sewage disposal and water are in the province of the Suffolk County
Board of Healths not within the authority of the Board of Appeals or
Southold Zoning Ordina/~ce.
A condition of granting, this right of Way is that the right
of way shall be improved by cle~rim~weedss grass~ un.~e, rbrushs it
shall be gradeds and back-run to fill in iow spots, The m/nimum
suxfface to he'imprOved shallhe 15 feet. This right of way Shall
be subject tO .the final approval of the buil ,c~ng ~inspector&~
The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance ~ill
produce practical difficulties or ur~necessary hardshipl tb~ hardship
created is unique a~d would not he shared by all properties alike in
the immediate vic'inity of this property and in the ~ame use district;
and the variance does observe the spirit of the Ordinance and will not
change the character of the district,
THBRBFORBs IT WAS RB$OLV~D Robert A. and Phyllis A. Graeb~ Wood-
cliff Drives Mattitucks New York~ be granted permlssio~ to divide lots
and o~ain approval of access as applied for on property 1= ated on
private road off east side Ole Jule Lanes Mattitucks New York. The
right of way shall he improved as se~ forth above.
Pursuant to f4c~J~u 26? ~ ~o Torn Lev ~nd
l~e~JfJ~ne o~ ~bo muendod ]Ju~d~n~/ ~n~ OrdLuince o£ the
Toun o£ 8outho~d, Su~fo~ county, Iov ~ork, pUb~Lc
of ~ Toil of 8ou~hoZd, at the Tarn Of£~, KiLn Road,
Sou~Gd, lev ~o~, on Au~J~ 29, ~, oe ~e
7t4S ~.~ (B.D.S.T.), upeu ipp~cm~on of A~bez~
and ~Lue Gr&XX~., ~ld~ngt~EI Avenue, OroeupOZto Bev York,
Art~e ZZZ, f4ct~ 303, ~nd Art~e X, SictLo~ Z00Gi,
for pendJi~ou to redvco frontage. LocitLou of property,
LEGAL NOTICES
NOTICE OF HEARINGS
Pursuant to Section 267 of the Town
Law and the provisions of the amend-
ed Building Zone Ordinance of the
Town of Southold, Suffolk County,
New York, public hearings w~ll be held
by the Zoning Board of Appeals oi
the Town of Southold, at the Town
Office, Main Road, Southold, New
York, on September 5, 1968, on the
following appeals:
7:30 P. M. (EDST), upon application i
of Robert A. and Phyllis A. Graeb,
Woodcliff Drive, Mattituck, New York,
for permission to divide lots and for
approval of access to two lots in ac-
cordance with the State of New, York i
Town Law, Section 2~0A. Location of
property: private road off e~t side
Ole Jule Lane, Mattituck, New York,
bounded north by private right-of-
way, cact by private right-of-way,
south by Schiller and Zebroski, west
by Staron.
7:45 P. M. (EDST), upon application
of Albert and Thaine Grllli, Washing-
ton Avenue, Greenport, New York, for
a variance in accordance v~th the!
Zoning Ordinance, Article 1TI, Section
303, and Article X, Section 1000A, for
permission to reduce frontage. Location
of property: north side Washington
Avenue, Oreenport, New York.
Any person desiring to be heard on
the above applications should appear
at the time and place specified.
DATED: AUOUST 1§, ~
BY ORDER O1~ THE SOUTHOLD
TOWN BOARD O1~ APPEALS
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK l ss:
STATE OF NEW YORK
C. Whitney Booth, Jr., being duly sworn, soys
that he is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND
TRAVELER - MA'I-I'ITUCK WATCHMAN, o public news-
paper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that
the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been
published in said Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watch-
successively, commencing on the ................. -.,~.....: ...............
Sworn to be{ore me this ...... ~2.~...'. ......... day of
Notary Public ~/
LEGAL NOTICE
Notice of Hearings
- Pursuant to Section 267 of the
Town Law and' the provisions,of the
amended Building Zone Ordinance
of the Town of Southold, Suffolk
County,
will be
of
appeals:
Mattituck,
· permissian to divide
o.f access to!
twd lots in accordance with the
State of New York ToTM L~aw, Sec-
tion 280A. Loealion of pro,p.erty:
private road off east side Ole Jule
Lanel Mattitu-~;l~,..!New 'York,~ bound2
ed ,north by 'pri~a.te right-of-way,
east .bY private right-of-way, sodth~
,by Schiller ~and ZebrOski, west by
-Sta~on. · . ,
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ] ~'
STAT~- OF I~IEW YORK, ~ ss:
says that . .~..~ is Prinie¢ and ~bHsher ,of the SUFFOLK
%rEEELY TIMES, a newspaper published ~at Greenport, in said
cou.nty~ .and ~hat the n'oti~, of which the ,annezed is a printed
~opy, .has been published in t'he s~aid Suffolk Week~ Times
o.nce in each week, ~or ...... ~ ............... week~
successively commencing on ~e . ~~ ..........
S~rn to befo~re me this .~%~ .~.. 1
day of ......... 19¢.~'.. J
I~O~M ~0. 3
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
TOWN CL:ERK'S OFFICE
SOUTHOLD, N. Y.
I~OTICE OF DISAPPROVAL
File No ................................................................... Date .] ..................... ~.~g~.s...t.....J.2. ................ 19__.6...8
14attituck~ N.Y.
survey
- - : ~mae lo~ on pvt -
-~or permit to ~_~ ...................................... ~[~i~e premises located at ..................................
Map ........... ~ ....................... Block ........... ~ ....................... Lot ............ ..~y.~x.. ............................. is
Y~YX Sec 280A Town La~.~
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK
APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR APPEAL NO. ~'~,~ O/
TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y.
ROBert r ~ . Graeb and
:K (We)..~.h~.lis.:A,..~Gr~aeh ........................... of .i.'.W. Qo~ti~',,f...D,,~i~ ....................................
Name of Appella,nt Street anci Number
~t~i'q~k'[ ................................... .................................. l~..~r.QZ'k .......... HEREBY APPEAL TO
Municipality State
THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO ..................................... DATED .......... /.. )
WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO
..........
Name of' Appiic~:~-"f~;-":~';.~i-[- ................
of
( )
( )
PERMlT TO USE
PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY
1 LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY East,.of 0tejule Lane, on 2~.. ft. right o£ way
Street Use District on Zoning Map
.l. emd./~...e.~s..t.w.e,r.d..$.z:.~...0.1.e.;j:~i.e...L.e~e, adjoining land of Starch.
Mep No. Lot No.
sectian~ and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by nu, mbe[. Do not quot~the
3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for
( ) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordin,a,nce or Zoning Map
( ,",~-' A VARIANCE due to lack of access (,State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws
Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3
PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub-
Ordinance.)
4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (has)~ been madc=:,~c'_"~:: _ ' ~-.:' -:.:_-- - :-
z ~' ' '-:.: -."~_ - - :- ..--ith respect to this property.
Such eppeal was ( ) request for a special permit
( ~ request for a variance
(X)request for access
and was made in Apl~eal No ....... ~29 ................... Dated ..M~rch..iS.,...i~62 ................................
&ccess was ~ranted for the single lot subject to approval of the "
REASON FOR APPEAL
.( )
( )
( )
is requested for the reason that
into two lots.
A Variance to Section 280A_Subse_ction 3
A Variance to ~e Zoning Ordinance
applicants wish to divide their property
l~or~n ZB1
(Continue on other side)
REASON FOR APPEAL
C:ontinued
1 STRICT APPLICATI'ON OF THE ORDINANCE WOuld produce practical difficulti'es or unneces'
sary HARDSHIP beCause applicants are the o~ers of a lot fronting 200 feet
on a 25 foot right of way with a depth on the East of 1#0.35 feet
and on the West of 118.71 feet. They wish to divide~ the lot as
show~ on the enclo~sed sketch so that each lot Will contain' over
i2~500 feet. The properties to the North and East of these lots
are moderate sized parcels and moderate sized residences. It is
believed that the parcel could be _better utilized in two lots-with
privileges for each lot on the dredged canal. The locality does not
warrant a large residence for the whole lot and a small residence on
the single parcel would be out of character.
2. The hardship created, is UNIQUE and is notshared by all properties alike in the immediate
vicinity ofthis property and in this use district bec,ause the residences in this
neighborhood are all on public roads.-This parcel is the only one
on a private road.
3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE
CHARACTER OF THE DI.STRICT because it wo~!d coz~orm to the other lots ±~
the neighborhood. Applicants would also construct a suitable oiled
road extending easterly from Olejule Lane to the northeast corner
of the property of at least ten feet in width.
STATE OF NEW YORK )
)
COUNTY OF Suffolk )
Robert ~. Graeb
Sworn to this ..........]'.~...~..~.. .................... day of ............. ~.~.~,S.~. ............................ 19 68
LAW OFFICES
WILLIAM WICKHAM
MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND
NEW YORK [1952
5i6- 298- 8353
August 12, 1968
Board of Appeals
Tow~ o£ Southold
Main Road
Southold, New York
Gentlemen:
We enclose £or your consideration am appli-
cation for a variance in behal£ of ~r. and ~_rs. Robert
Graeb. 0~r check to coyer your filing fee of ~5.00
is also enclosed.
WW/as
emcls.
Very cordially your~ ,
September 5, 1968
We the ~ of the 01e Jule~i~i~
recommend that the application for division
of
the
lot
owned by Robert A. and Phyllis A. Graeb, located on
private road off east side of 01e Jule Lane, Mattituck,
New York, bounded north by private road, south by
Schiller and Zebroski, west by Staron, be denied.
September 5, 1968
We the m~s o~ the Ole Jule
recommend thm~the application for division of the lot
owned by Robert A. and Phyllis A. Graeb, located on
private road off east side of 01e Jule Lane, Mattituck,
New York, bounded north by private road, south by
Schiller and Zebroski, west by Staron, be denied.
Auquet 22, 1968
Robert &. G Phyllte A. Graeb
woodcl J.££ Drive
MattLtuck, L.Z., ~ev York 11952
Dear Hr. & Mre. Or&eh,
In the legal notice FOu received, the date £or the Board of
Appeals hoar*-ga wu stated to be Auquot 20. Thls date has been
changed. The hear/ag for Four appllcat/an w~ll be held on
September 5.
rt w. Gllllal$1e, ~r. ~0~ChaLTman
Southold bn Board of Appeale