Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-07/14/1977 APPEAL BOARD MEMBERS Robert W. Gillispie, Jr., Chairman Robert Bergen Charles Griflonis, Jr. Settle Doyen~ Jr. Fred Hulse, Jr. Southold Town Board o£Appeals SOUTHOLD, L. I'., N.Y. 11~1T1 Telephone 765-~5~0 MINUTES Southold Town Board of Appeals July 14~ 1977 A regular meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals was held at 7:30 P.M. (~.D.S.T.), Thursday, July 14, 1977, at the Town Hall, Main ROad, Southold, New York. There were present: Messrs: Robert W. Gillispie, Jr., Chairman; Robert Bergen; Fred Hulse, Jr.; Charles Grigonis, Jr.; Serge Doyen, J~. P~IC HEARING: Appeal No. 2279 - 7:30 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) Recessed hearing upon application of Elizabeth A. Yaro, P.O. Box 1221, Minnehaha Boule~ard, Southold, New York for a variance · n accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 and Bulk Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient width amd area. Location of property: Minnehaha Boulevard, Southold, New York, bounded on the~north by Minnehaha Boulevard; east by Laughing Water Property Owners Association; south by Corey Creek; west by G. Moyle. THE CBAIBFa~N: ~The first item on.the agenda is a recessed ~earing on Elizabeth Yaro for a variance to divide property with insufficient width and area on Minnehaha_Boulevard, S0~thold. I think the Board. is agreed that basedon surrounding properties this division Should~be made. However, we're surroUnded by other agencies that have to have.these things referred to the~ and the ~.E.C. people have indicated that, while they don't ha~e authority at this time to stop the subdivision Of-~his lot, they recommend against it. The same thing is more or less true of the remarks that w~e .ma~..by the Planning Commission. It was also referred %o t~he S~ffolk County Board of Health and we have received their letter. "We have received the above referenced application to divide the property into two (2) building plots and, as per your request, we have the following comments. Since we do not have an application before us, we do not have all the data we would normally require in order to make a decision as to whether or not we would approve the application. We are not Southold Town Board of Appeals -2~ July 14, 1977 aware of the soil conditions on the plots, elevations above ground- water or the location of existing wells and cesspools on adjacent propertie~ Laughing Waters has had water quality problems and we would require that the well be installed and tested prior to our issuance of a permit to construct. It is noted that Mr. Larkin of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation leaves doubt as to whether or not State approval would be issued because, on one hand, he states that they 'do not require permits for sub- division of lots'. However, they will become involved when an application to build on this land is submitted to their office. Our overall feeling is that the quantity and quality of the groundwater in the area is suspect. Unless public water were available, we would not favor splitting this lot." Very truly yours, /s/ Robert A. Villa, P.E. Chief General Engineering Services My recommendation to the Board would be that with all the surrounding lots smaller tha~ this proposed division which will leave two one-third acre lots that the Board act on this and act favorably on the request subject to the condition that these lots, this lot not be divided into two lots unless the applicant is able to receive Board of Health approval for the water and sewage. I'll offer that resolution. CHARLES GRIGONIS~ JR.: I'll second that. ELIZABETH YARO: Can I ask you one question, Mr. Gillispie, who was the gentleman who wrote you that letter? THE CHAIRMAN: The letter I just read? Villa. ELIZABETH YARO: And his title? THE CHAIRMAN: Chief, General Engineering Services. He's been there a long time. ELIZABETH YARO: Where is that, Riverhead? THE CHAIRMAN: Yes, in the County Center. ELIZABETH YARO: This has been dragging on for a long time, I haven't had it surveyed for elevations or anything. THE~ CHAIRMAN: Do you plan to sett~the, se two lots? Southold Town Board of Appeals July 14, 1977 ELIZABETH YARO: I don't know, you may force me into something that I don't want to do. THE CHAIRMAN: You just want to divide them. ELIZABETH YARO: I want to divide them for my own protection. THE CHAIRMAN: What he's saying here is that they will have to tes~ it before they will approve the water or cesspools. ELIZABETH YARO: They want elevation surveys, they want test pools, you know, drilling well tests. THE CHAIPd~AN: It's not difficult, it's done every day. ELIZABETH YARO: They want legal papers giving easement rights ... I don't understand because the property is all mine, but in case I do sell, they want that. THE CHAIRMAN: Easement over what? ELIZABETH YARO: If I take the water from the other side of the r~ad or if I take-the water from one lot to service the other. THE CHAIRMAN: You'd have to furnish whoever bought the lot ... ELIZABETH YARO: But these are preparatory before I do anything. THE CHAIRMAN: This is something you'll have to do anyway and I would s~ggest that you do it right now. ELIZABETH YARO: If you can help me in anyLway or give me any suggestions, I'd be very grateful. THE CHAIRMAN: I'd go see them and ask them exactly what they want and then get it for them. ELIZABETH YARO: Mr. Villa? THE CHAIRMAN: Yes. ELIZABETH YARO: He's the Chief of General Engineering in what department? THE CHAIRMAN~ He's the Chief of General Engineering Services in the County Center, the Department of Health. ELIZABETH YARO: I've already interviewed two fellows there but I didn't see him. THE CHAIRMAN: Well, I'd do just what they want because all these other agencies aside from us are getting in the act now. $outhold Town Board of Appeals -4- July 14, 1977 This is just the beginning. They managed to postpone, for a while at least, these environmental impact surveys. If we had those, this might drag on for 18 months or a year or longer. In the first place~ we don't have anybody equipped in the Town of Southold to make an environmental impact statement and the law, as it was written, requires environmental impact statements on any project ... ELIZABET~ YARC: The thing is, I'm afraid this will happen and I won't be able to do things ipso facto if they change the law. THE CHAIRMAN: That's why I suggest that you move right along. We've done what we can. Thanks very much for coming in. After investigation and inspection, the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to divide property with insufficient width and area, Minnehaha Boulevard, Southold, New York. The findings of the Board are that the Board is in agreement with the reasonlng of the applicant. Many lots in the surrounding area are smaller than the lots to be created. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe~the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, Elizabeth A. Yarc, P.O. Box 1221, Minnehaha Boulevard, Southold, New York, be GRANTED permission to divide property with insufficient width and area, south side Minnehaha Boulevard, Southold, New York, as applied for, subject to the following condition: This lot shall not be divided into two lots unless the applicant is able to receive Board Of Health approval for the water and sewage. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Grigonis, Doyen. Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, PUBLIC ~ING: Appeal No. 2307 - 7:40 P.M. (E.D'~$~T.) upon app'licatien of John and Olivia Fellinger-Ihar, 318~ Duck Pond Road, Cutchogue, New Y~k. fora variance in accordance with the Town Law, Section 280A for approval of access. Location of property: east side Duck Pond Road, Cutchog~e, New York, bounded on the north and south by Other land of applicant; east by J. 'and P. Zuhoski; west by Duck Pond Road. Southold Town Board of Appeals July 14, 1977 The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publication inc~he official newspapers, notice to the applicant, and disapproval from the Building Inspector. The Chairman also read statement from the Town Clerk that notification by certified mail had been made to: Antone Harris; Nicholas Aliano. Fee paid $15.00. THE CHAIRMAN: The application is accompanied~ by a sketch indicating that the proposed lot is part of a tract of 26.3 acres on the easterly side of Duck Pond Road,s.which they propose to subdivide, and that this particular application applies to the northeasterly lot of the proposed subdivision, Lot 922. It con- sists of 43,700 sq. ft., 491' on one side ... SHEP SCHEINBERG, ESQ.: That would be 245' and 260' along the back. THE CHAIRMAN: 260' on the east and 170', approximately, in width. The proposal here is to come in on what appears to be a 30' right-of-way moving east from Duck Pond Lane and you would improve 15' of this, is that correct? SHEP SCHEINBERG, ESQ.: Let me show you this, my name is Shep Scheinberg, I'm an attorney from Riverhead. To give you a little background ... first, I nmed a little clarification. When we first approached Mr. Terry as to what type of variance was required, he indicated we needed 280A. I studied the Ordi- nance and I didn't think we needed a 280A because of the fact that Lot 22 includes 15' This 15' strip is owned by ~Lot 22 so it's not a right-of-way. It's not a 280A type of application. THE CHAIRMAN: I think it is because you're required to have approval of access, whether you own it or whether somebody else does, you still need approval of access from this Board. Has this subdivisio~ been drawn up yet or approved by the Planning Board? SHEP SCEEINBERG, ESQ.: I'll get into that right now, sir. We ~have been before the Planning Board on several occasions and this particular, this is the full subdivision map. We have more capies ifi YOu~'d like to see them. Originally, Lot 922 was a re- charge basin. ~HE C~IAIRM~N: Lot 22? That's high Land. SHEP SCHEINBERG, ESQ.: That's why it's no longer a recharge Sasin. Originally, it was a recharge basin and.if you will lo0k down toward the southwest, you see a parcel proposed to be dedi- cated to the Town. We appeared before the Town Board and the Town agreed to.a bargain, the bargain being that~if we~dedicated the parcel down toward Oregon Road, they would be satisfied to do Southold Town Board of Appeals July 14, 1977 away with any other recharge basin, that being the one on Lot 22. I have the letter '~hich was sent to the Town Board, that I had sent to the Town Board, setting forth our bargain. Our bargain has been accepted subject to our coming before your Board in that we can now change the old reoharge basin that was at Lot 22 into a legal lot. THE CHAIRMAN: Let me ask you why you need a recharge basin at all? SHEP SCHEINBERG, ESQ.: We do have one now, down at the other end. We no longer require a recharge basin on Lot 22. THE CHAIRMAN: I understand. Why do you need one anywayJon the whole plot? SHEP SCHEINBERG, ESQ.: Because of the fact that a great deal of water collects down in front of this new recharge basin and the Town had been quite anxious to acquire some property in this lo- cation to take care of the water that has been on the road. THE CHAIRMJ~N: The drainage easement is along here? (on map) SHEP SCHEINBERG, ESQ.: That's correct. JOHN FELLINGER-IHAR: The problem is here. In the winter when the ground is frozen and it rains, there is a snow fence here, the snow drifts when it's dry and then comes the rain and the rain melts the snow and then it gets higher. I have photos. That is the point, that it's not our fault. As a matter of fact, five years ago, there could have been a deal ... SHEP SCHEINBERG, ESQ.: That doesn't matter. JOHN FELLINGER-IHAR: Well, we donated the land to show our good ~ill. SHEP SCHEINBERG, ESQ.: The bargain being that he would donate the land ... THE CHAIRMAN: And they accepted it? SHEP SCHEINBERG, ESQ.: They haven't accepted it yet. The bargain is subject to certain things. They will improve the re- char~%basin~ they will construct it, we are only giving the land. However, we had this area where Lot 22 is now that was a recharge basin. We ~on't want it to just sit there~ we would prefer to utilize it as a building lot. THE CHAiR¥~N: You're going to run a drainage easement all the way over to'this? SHEP SCHEINBERG, ESQ.: That is correct. Southold Town Board of Appeals -~7~ July 14, 1977 THE CHAIRMAN: Where does it go through? SHEP SCHEINBERG, ESQ.: Thmre (on map). This has all been approved by the various other municipality ... our problem was ga%ning access to Lot 22 and the only way that we were able to gain access is through this 15' wide strip. THE CHAIRMAN: Let me ask you, the other 15' here belongs to who? SHEP SCHEINBERG, ESQ.: This is where the Fellinger-Ihars reside, this is their home. They have sufficient frontage on Duck Pond Road and this is an auxiliary access for them. THE CHAIRMAN: So what this proposes is just a 15' access, is that right? Just to this one lot? SHEP SCHEINBERG, ESQ.: That's correct. THE CHAIRMAN: That's all you need. The only thing you'll have to do is remove the topsoil and fill it witk bank run and scarify the bank run into the surface subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. Does anyone else wish to add anything to this? The Town Attorney has indicated, he told me something about this proposal. I think it's in order unless somebody wishes to object. (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection, the Board finds that the applicants request appre~al~of access, east side Duck Pond Road, Cutchogue, New York. The findings of the Board are that this right-of-way or owned a~cess should have the topsoil removed and replaced with bank run and scarified into the surface. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficuliies or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all proper~£es alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the O~dinance. On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED, John and Olivia Fellinger-Ihar, 3180 Duck Pond Road, Cutchogue~ New York, be GRANTED approval for a 15' access solely to Lot ~22 as described in the Young and Young survey of March 22, 1977, east side D~ck Pond Road, Cutchogue, New York, subject to the following co~ition: The access road is subject to the approval of the Town Engineer. Southold Town Board of_Appeals July 14, 1977 Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2309 - 7:.55 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon application of Long Island Vineyards, Inc., Atvahs Lane, Cutchogue, New York (Abigail Wickham, Esq.) for a special ex- ception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section I00-30 C 6(f) for permission to construct off-premises directional sign. Location of property: South side CR27, Cutchogue, New York, bounded on the north by CR27; east by now or formerly E. Zuh~ki; south by land of applicant; west by now or formerly W. Simchick. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, notice to the applicant an~ disapproval from the Building InspectOr. The Chairman also read statement from the Town Clerk that notification by certified mail had been made to: Wesley Simchick; Edward A. Zuhoski, Jr.; Frances Zuhoski; Mary Harris. Fee paid $15.00. THE CHAIRMAN: There is. a letter of consent from the owners of the property which reads as follows: "We hereby consent to the erection of a directional sign by Long Island Vineyards, Inc. on the northwest corner of the right-of-way over our properties." /s/ Edward A. Zuhoski, Jr. Jean Zuhoski Frances .Zuhoski The application is accompanied by a photostat of the County Tax Map which indicates the t~o accesses %0 which the applicant referred. Also, the survey indicates that the route from Route 27 or the access from Route 27 is a lengthy one, and it would be preferable tm have the access from Alva's ~ane. Is there anyone present who~Wishes to speak for this application? ABIGAIL WIC~HAM, ESQ.: I'd like tO Point out that the purpose of this application is not so much to advertise the v~neyard, it's t© he~p alleviate a traffic problem that~ the Zuhoskis have been suffering due to dust during the summer months.. We'd like to re- route traffic. The right-of-way property is owned by Frances Zuhoski and the Hargraves have an easement over it. I believe Edward and Jean Zuhoski also have an easement over it. THE CHAIRMAN: The other entrance is along the Long Island RailrOad, right? Southold Town Board of Appeals -9- July 14, 1977 ABIGAIL WICKHA~ ESQ.: Yes, it is over land of the Hargraves. THE CHAIRMAN: Anyone else wish to speak for this application? (There was no response.) Anyone wish to speak against it? (There was no response.) I think the Board recognizes that we have to have some signs in the public interest, the ~ewer we have the better, but the Board has long recognized that this type of sign'is in the in- terest of the travelling public. There seems to be a lot of interest in this vineyard, there are a lot of visitors, and it would be my recommendation that this be granted, subject to the usual regulations in connection with signs which relate to the distance from the highway and the size of the sign. ABIGAIL WICKHAM, ESQ.: I would also like to point out that the sign would read "Hargrave Vineyard, Visitors' Entrance" that's all. After investigation and inspection, the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to construct off-premises directional sign, south side CR27, Cutchogue, New York. The findings of the Board are that the Board is in agreement with the reasoning of the applicant. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would p~oduce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; ~he hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate ~icinity of this property and · n the same use district; and the variance will not change the - character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED, Long Island Vineyards, Inc., Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue, New York, be GRANTED ~ermission to construct off-premises directional sign, south side CR27, Cutchogue, New York, as applied for, subject to the following condition: The sign shall be no larger than 4~ by 6~ and shall be no closer than 5' to any property line. Southold Town Board of Appeals July 14, 1977 Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2304 - 8:05 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon application of Howard F. and Janet A. Malone, 35 Third Avenue, Massapequa Park, New York, for a variance in accordance witk the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 and Bulk Schedule for permission to construct addition with insufficient side-yard area. Location of property: 250 Blue Marlin Drive, Greenport, New York; Lot $3, Map of Southold Shores. The Chairman ~pened the hearing by reading the application for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, notice to the ap- plicant, and disapproval from the Building Inspector. The Chairman also read statement from the Town C~erk that notification by certified mail had been made to: Henry A. Falk; Harold Reese, Sr. Fee paid $15.00. THE CHAIRMAN: The sketch accompanying this application indicates that the applicant has constructed a patio which is within 4' of the easterly line of the property. There is a wall around thus patio which is perhaps 2' high. The lot is angled and the lot lines do not leave Blue MarlinL~Drive at right angles. Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application~ HOWARD MALONE: I'm the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Well, I think you prepared the application very well, I i~ink you've said everything that has t~ be said. I don't know what could be added. It's something that you've built over a period of time, I gather. HOWARD M-ALONE: 10 years, sir. This to THE CH~ A lot has changed in zoning in 10 years. to me. Is there anyone present who wishes application? (There was no response.) I would think that the Board ought to grant this application for a variance due to the unusual shape~ of the-lot and the location of the house on the lot, and that you should be restricted from Southold Town Board of Appeals July 14, 1977 adding anything in the way of height to this patio. In other words, no superstructure on the present patio. ROBERT BERGEN: HOWARD MALONE: OK, right? THE CHAIP/~AN: In other words~you can never close it in . I'll never cl~se it in, no. A barbeque is A movable barbeque? HOWARD MALONE: A stone thing, not a mausoleum. THE CHAIRMAN: That'll be inside the perimeter of the walls. HOWARD MALONE: Yes. After investigation and inspection, the Board finds that the applicants request permission to construct addition with insuffi- cient side-yard area, 250 Blue Marlin Drive, Greenport, New York. The findings of the Board are that the Board is in agreement with the reasoning of the applicant. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance wo~ld produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and zn the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordimance. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED, Howard F. and Janet A. Malone, 35 Third Avenue, Massapequa Park, New York, be GRANTED permission to construct addition with insufficient side-yard area, Lot $3, Map of Southold Shores, 250 Blue Marlin Drive, Greenport, New York, as applied for, subject to the following condition: There shall be no further construction in the patio azea other than a small barbeque. Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Gillispie, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals approve minutes dated June 23, 1977. Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. Southold Town Board of Appeals July 14, 1977 On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Gillispie, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals approve minutes dated July 1, 1977. Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2305 - 8:10 P.M. (H.D.S.T.) upon application of Ernest and Ruth Gibson, RD 1, Box 195A, Southold, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100~30 and Bulk Schedule for permission to construct accessory building in side and front yard area. Location of property: Sound View Avenue and Kenney's Road, Southold, New York, bounded on the north by Pausewang; east by M. White; south by Sound View Avenue; west by Kenney's Road. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, notice to the appli- cast, and disapproval from the Building Inspector. The Chairman also read statement from the Town Clerk that notification by certified mail had been made to: Mrs. W. Pausewang; Mrs. Mabel White. Fee paid - $15.00. THE CHAIRMAN: The applicant's residence is on ... it has two front yards, Soundview Avenue and Kenney's Road. It's an unusual~ shaped lot. The frontage on Kenney's Road is 98' on the westerly end of the lot, and considerably less, 60' plus, on the easterly end of the lot with 133' along Soundview Avenue and 125' on the northerly~boundary next to Burns. It has two front yards, a regular side yard area, and the applicant proposes to p~t a two-car garage east of the house. It's in an area of lots which are undersized by present zoning standards. Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? RUTH GIBSON: I guess no one's going to protest. THE CHAIRMAN: You have quite a bank there to cut down on Soundview Avenue. RUTH GIBSON: Yes, we do. THE CHAIRMAN: As far as possible, we try to have, not to have garages located so that people back out into the traffic for your own safety as well as others. It doesn't appear as though much can be done here, but I think you had a suggestion, didn't you Robert? ROBERT BERGEN: I suggested that they don't have a woodpile to the right of it when you're backing out where it is not because Southold Town Board of Appeals ~13- July 14, 1977 when you dig it down, you're going to be lower and you won't be able to see over the woodpile. Another thing, if we pass this, at no time will you be able to attach it to the h~use. RUT~ GIBSON: No, I don't want to. ROBERT BERGEN: Because that would make your house, make it part of the house and you wouldn't have the side line. THE CHAIRMAN: You don't want a breezeway here? RUT~ GIBSON: I don't think so, I'm interested in keeping the rooms on that side as light as possible. THE CHAIPJ4AN: You have windows on the east side. RUTH GIBSON: Yes. ROBERT BERGEN: You won't be able to have a breezeway. RUTH GIBSON: I understand. I'm interested in having as much light as possible. This is a separate accessory structure. THE CHAIRMAN: RUTH GIBSON: THE CHAIRMAN: Yes. RUTH GIBSON: THE CHAIRMAN: RUTH GIBSON: THE CHAIRMAN: in the side yard. RUTH GIBSON: narrow. T~E CHAIRMAN: Anyone else have any questions? (There was norresponse.) Your requested side yard variance is down to 4', isn't it? I believe so. Is the Town ordinance 3'? 3' for an accessory buildingr yes. I guess that's why they wanted to do it 4' But that's in the rear yard, this qualifies Yes, it is, becm~se our back yard is very I don't really think that it makes much difference if it's 4' or 5', if we require 5' off the line ... ROBERT BERGEN: I think it should be 4' THE CHAIRMAN: If we require another foot that's going to cut down the light and so forth in the easterly windows of the house. I think we'd better leave it just the way it is. Southold Town Board of Appeals July 14, 1977 RUTH GIBSON: I have a plan with me, I think. Oh, you have it. FRED HULSE, JR.: It's not on here. THE CHAIRMAN: Well, let's just say no closer than 4' to the easterly line. ROBERT BERGEN: Yes, that one corner there. That gives you room to get out there and paint it and all without going on some- body else's property. RUTH GIBSON: We don't need to paint it, it's white cedar shakes. After investigation and inspection, the Board finds that the applicants request permission to construct accessory building in side and front yard area, Soundview Avenue and Kenney's Road, Southold, New York. The findings of the Board are that the Board is in agreement with the reasoning of the applicant. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hard[ship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in~'the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED, Ernest and Ruth Gibson, RD 1, Box 195A, Southold, New York, be GRANTED permission to construct accessory building in side and front yard area, Soundview Avenue and Kenney's Road, SouthQld, New York, as applied for,~subject to the following conditions: The building shall be no closer than 4' to any property line. The building shall not extend past the present house line faoing on Soundview Avenue. Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2310 - 8:20 P~M~ (E.D.S.T.) upon application o.f Ernest C. Radford a/c Marion ~. Fitzsimmons, 69 Westgate Boulevard, Plandome, New York for a variance in $outhold Town Board of Appeals -15- July 14, 1977 accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 and Bulk Schedule for permission to set off lot with insufficient width and area. Location of property: N/S Main Road, Orient, New York, bounded on the north by Long Island Sound; east by Woodhollow Properties, Orient-by-the-Sea Subdivision; south by Main Road; west by other land of applicant and Rozawsky. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its~publication in the official newspapers, notice to the appli- cant, and disapproval from the Building Inspector. The Chairman also read statement from the Town Clerk that notification by certified mail had been made to: Woodhollow Properties; George Sutherland; Walter Mellas; John Rozawsky. Fee paid - $15.00. THE CHAIRMAN: This application is accompanied by a sketch, a survey by Van Tuyl dated January 4, 1965, indicating that the propose~ property is in .fact at the south easterly corner of this tract and would have 110' on the State Road and that there's a house on it and several other buildings. On the easterly boundary it intersects, it does not intersect the State Road at right angles, so that on the easterly boundary there's a distance of 310', on the northerly boundary 125', on the westerly boundary there are two courses of 180', 190', and it looks as though an attempt was made to include most of the buildings but a couple were left out. ERNEST RADFORD: Actually, one of those buildings burned down some years ago. THE CHAIP~4AN: The one on the line? ERNEST RADFORD: Yes, it's no longer in existence. THE CHAIRMAN: Is that the reason for the two courses on there, we were wondering. ERNEST RADFORD: To bring those things in ... THE CHAIRMAN: To bring the buildings in. ERNEST RADFORD: Right. THE CHAIRMAN: I figured it to be roughly about. 40,000 sq. ft., and somebody has written in here 41,300', do you know what it is? ERNEST RADFORD: I wrote that in, but actually we can make it whatever you want. We can make it a little deeper or a little Wider on that back end, it's 125', we could make it 130', whatever is necessary. Southold Town Board of Appeals -16- July 14, 1977 THE CHAIRMAN: There seems to be a flaw in this reasoning. It's not that I'm against setting Hhis parcel off, but I doubt if the Planning Board or the Planning Commission or the State Highway would want two entrances, two 150' ... in other words, this 150' that you're talking about on the State Road might not be necessary. You could have 150' on ~he inner road of the sub- division because they wouldn't want two exits onto the State Road. In fact, they'd probably prohibit that, see what I mean? They would specifically ask you not to have, to have all traffic enter and exit from the subdivision's road, you'll have to have some kind of a road in there. ROBERT BERGEN: If you put that in the center, that gives you a driveway off of it to eack of the lots. ERNEST RADFORD: That would be the idea, not to have the road on this side but in the middle. THE CHAIRMAN: But the 150' is meaningless because the State, I don't think, would give you access for private plots of a subdivision. ERNEST RADFORD: I don't quite follow you. THE CHAIRMAN: In other words, if you had 20 lots here, they'd want them all to come out on one road. They don't want everybody coming out of four lots along the road, along the highway. FRED HULSE, JR.: In other words, these lots are going to access into this road right here. ERNEST RADFORD: Right, that's the way they would be. THE CHAIRMAN: So that 150' doesn't matter so much as you thought it did. But I don't think we would want to carve this out of this thing without having you go to the Planning Board. I think it's OK with us. to buy the property, so he wants to sell property to the tenant. THE CHAIRMAN: Well, I think, if you don't mind, we'd like to refer to the Planning Board, we'll write them a letter and indicate to them that as far as we're concerned this meets with our approval to create a 40,000 sq. ft. lot. It looks like a natural division the way the trees are planted and the whole thing. There's a natural tree line running down here. What is this 12' right-of- way here? Southold Town Board of Appeals July 14, 1977 ERNEST RADFORD: That goes up to Gina Shepard's property, Mellas. She never uses it ~ow because she bought property from Orient-by-the-Sea and she has access through there. But we wanted to buy this and she wouldn't get rid of it right away. THE CHAIRMAN: It's not actual'.own~rship, it's just right- of-way, so it really doesn't affect it. ERNEST RADFORD: I don't know whether those pictures help at all in giving an idea of the frontage on the road. THE CHAIRMAN: We were down there, it's quite wooded. ERNEST RADFORD: The house is well set back. THE CHAIRMAN: It's way back. ERNEST RADFORD: I have here a supplement which I thought might go with my arguments on the application if it could be attached to it. (Mr. Radford submitted the supplement to the Chairman.) It's more or less a reiteration of what's already in there. THE CHAIRMAN: Well, I don't think we have any objection to this lot size as long as it's 40,000 sq. ft. and it looks to me as though you might get that. · ERNEST RADFORD: This could even be extended or widened out. THE CHAIRMAN: It's 200' short the way I figured it, approximately, When you~average these two widths. Anyhow you'll need 40,000 sq. ft. One of the conditions would be that this lot be at least 40~000 sq. ft. and at least 110' on the State Highway. The other argument, the 150' there, I don't think you need. The first thing they would look at'is how you're going to put the raad in this. ERNEST RADFORD: It really had nothing to do with it except for the future. THE CHAIRMAN: What's the acreage? ERNEST RADFORD: 34 I think it indicates. FRED HULSE, JR.: Here it is. 34.08 and you're taking one out so it's 33. THE CHAIRMAN: I don't know, mayb~.~Mrs. Fitzsimmons ... is she keeping this? ERNEST RADFORD: She's going to sell that to the tenant. Southold Town Board of Appeals July 14, 1977 THE CHAIRMAN: When she finds out what she can get for selling property she may want to sell the whole thing. ERNEST RADFORD: I don't think they want to get into that. THE CHAIRMAN: I think a survey should be furnished for our files showing exactly what the lot is. After investigation and inspection, the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to sen off lot with insufficient width and area, north side Main Road, Orient, New York. The findings of the Board are that the Board is in agreement with the reasoning of the applicant. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate ~icinity of this property and zn the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED, Marion D. Fitzsimmons, 69 Westgate Road, Plandome, New York, be GRANTED permission to set off lot with insufficient Width and area, north side Main Road, Orient, New York, as applied for, subject to the following conditions: The lot shall have at least 110' on the State Road~and at least 40,000 sq. ft. in area. 2. The lot is subject to the approval of the Planning Board. Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. P~BLI NG: Appeal No. 2306 - 8:40 P.M. (~ .T.) upon of Richard and Claire Labita c/o P~O. 470~ Matti~uck, New York for a variance in ac with the Z°nin~ Ordinance, Article I~I, SeCtion i00-30 and Bulk Schedule for permission to construct dweiling with insufficient front yard setback. Location of property: Bayview Road and Clearview Avenue West, Southold, New York, bounded on the north by H. Cords; east by P. Donahue; south by Clearview Avenue West; west by Bayview Roadl The Chairman opened the hearing.by reading the application for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, notice to the applicant, Southold Town Board of Appeals July 14, 1977 and disapproval from the Building Inspector. The Chairman also read statement from the Town Clerk that notification by certified mail had been made to: Henry Cordes; Patrick Donahue. Fee paid - $15.00. THE CHAIRMAN: The application is accompanied by a sketch, the May 31, 1977, survey by Van Tuyl, indicating that the house is parallel to Clearview Avenue and the setback is correct, 35', but the northwest corner is 33'6" or 1-1/2' over on Main Bayview Road. The southwesterly corner is 34'6" or 6" too close to the southwesterly cornsr. The lot is not rectangular and has two front yards, one on Clearview Avenue and one on Main Bayview Road. The length of the lot on Clearview Avenue is about 190', on Main Bay- view it's 117', and 105' on the easterly dimension. It's not quite rectangular. It appears to be approximately 20,000 sq. ft. Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? JON KERBS: I'm the contractor on the house. I went and got a survey made as soon as I found out what happened and there's a little difference between the two. It's actually 2' at that point (on map) instead of 1'6", and they're also coming up with 2/10 of a foot shy in the front. What did happen on this, I talked to the mason, and what he said is he sent an old Italian fellow ~out there and laid it out, and to him a little bit wasn't important. I'd set up the batter boards and given him a survey and everything but I just didn't stress to the guy who laid it out how important it was. That's the reason for it being off. As I say, it's a little bit different than what I gave you there. THE CHAIRMAN: This happens about every, I don~t know how many times a ~ a z n or fifteen times~. It used to' happen much more tried to establish r~le~s ~ We~w0Uld do, so we out saying that 35' meant 35.'. nto some ~he dourts which hard for ~the T0~ of Southold to prove that t the safety, he~.lth and welfare of the Town ~ is Off 6" or andi a half. Of course, it is a"mz ~'d like y°~as a builder what you would ~ do? The I get from the Buitd~n don't men,to se~d out there, thsy s once. When they tell it's got to be 35', that~'s it, they can't come out, if they did come out and check your.batter boards, it wouldn't do any.good. You say the Italian fellow who puts the cement in moves them. The<~>gu~ with the bulldozer is liable to move them too. How would you suggest that the Town handle this without hiring more people? Mayb~ you've got an idea, I don't. JON KERBS: No, I don't. It's difficult, I was right on the job when it was being poured~ I had everything out there so I was stupid enough to asstune it was right. This is the first house I'm doing So it's a good lesson for me to learn to check the forms before it's poured. Maybe there's some way, if this happens, some way to have somebody check the forms before it's poured. Southold Town Board of Appeals -20- July 14, 1977 T~E CHAIRMAN: A few years ago, we made people tear down the walls, three or four of them had to. I don't know how it should be handled, unless you had more than one foundation inspection, which you didn't used to have at all. Sometimes we didn't find it until-~th~ house was up. CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR.: We once found a house on2the wrong lot. THE CHAIRMAN: they traded lots. to do with this? Yes, a guy broke ground on the wrong lot and Does the rest of the Board have any idea what FRED HULSE, JR.: You'd have to have more inspectors to in- spect when the forms are put up, that's all. But we don't have enough inspectors, a guy can't put up his forms and then wai~ two or three days for an inspector to come and make sure he's got them in the right place. THE CHAIRMAN: Well, I would think that in the future you'll probably be more careful because it's a nuisance to come in here, fill out a bunch of forms and pay fifteen bucks and worry about it. JON KERBS: That's right, I went and saW the people who live next door to let them know what was going on. It involved quite a bit of time. THE CHAIRMAN: us in the future. application? Well, maybe we've got a good builder coming at Is there anyone who wishes to speak against this (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection, the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to construct dwelling with insuffi- cient front yard setback, Bayview Road and Clearview Avenue West, Southold, New York. The findings of the Board are that the error in locating the foundation will not affect the safety, health, and welfare of the Town of Southold. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance wou ~Ce practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship; the ~ created is unique and would not be shared by all alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED, Richard and Claire Labita c/o Jon C. Kerbs, P.O. Box 470, Mattituck, New York, be GRANTED permission to construct Southold To~n Board of Appeals July 14, 1977 dwelling with insufficient front yard setback, Bayview Road and Clea~view Avenue West, Southold, New York, as applied for. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Grigonis, Doyen. Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2308 - 8:50 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon application of Helmut Hess, Middle Road, Peconic, New York (Stanley Corwin, Esq.) for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100m30 and Bulk Schedule, and the New York State Building Code and Housinq Codes for ap- proval of building built in violation of the Building and Housing Codes. Location of property: East side Beverly Road (Pvt. Rd.~, Southold~ New York, bounded on the north and west by now or formerly I. Meissnest; east by V. Ruch Est.; south ~y Mill Creek. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance~ legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, notice to the appli- cant, and disapproval from the Building Inspector. The Chairman also read statement from the Town Clerk that notification by certified m~iI had been made to: Est. of Valentine Ruch; Irene Meissnest; Mr. and Mrs. George Santis. Fee paid - $15.00. The Chairman also read the supplement to Paragraph I on the application. THE CHAIRMAN: We have the notice of disapproval that I read to you dated January 27, 1977. There is an additional notice of disapproval on March 4, 1977, to Helmut Hass, Middle Road, Peconic. (The Chairman read the March 4, 1977, notice of disapproval from the Building Inspector.) ~ation is accompanied by a sketch, surveyed March 4, hat a garage has been attached t6 a one~and~0ne- with an enclosed southerly porch and a arentty was going to be a breezeway or else a ~acant area, and has been incorporated into the It's difficult to read dimensions here, it approaches 21%~1ot coverage of the total lot which is 9,460 sq. ft. There is a 20' right-of-way extending over the property of Meissnest 75' from BeVerly Road. This is~ in fact, a so~theaster~ corner of the property originally acquired by Hess. Is there any- one present who wishes to speak for this application? $~ANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: I filed the application for Mr. Hess, I don't ~think there's anything I can add to the application. I'd be glid to answer any questions if I can. If ~the Board feels this · s a situation where some kind of a condition maybe ought to be im- posed as a condition to the granting of any kind of relief, I'd like to address myself to whatever the Board's thinking is in that direction. Southold Town Board of Appeals July 14, 1977 THE CHAIRMAN: Well, for one thing, I don't think the Board can approve something that's an accomplished fact without an application that's been denied. I think in one part of your letter here you suggest that. I don't think the Board can act on something that hasn't been applied for. STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: I think that the Board should take an administrative note of the fact that the building is there in violation or-the §ections that the Building Inspector has pointed out and complete the application as though it were being made in the first instance as an application for a variance as it is now. In other words, what we're talking about really, as far as the Zoning Ordinance is concerned I think, is the tying in of the two buildings with the breezeway. As I understand the situation to date, had the breezeway not been connected, the side yard for the separate garage would have been OK. THE CHAIRMAN: An accessory building can be put in the rear yard area. STANLEY C0RWIN, ESQ.: What we're asking the Board to do is to consider the application as one being made as though we were asking for thai-in the first instance. THE ~HAIR/W2~N: There are several other parts of this appli- cation that we~can't act on, for instance, the violation of the New York State Building Code and the violation of the Southold Town Housing Code. STANLEY CO,WIN, ESQ.: I'm not even sure, from my conversations with Mr. Terry~ exactly what they are but we're certainly willing, as a condition~to the granting of the variance, to correct anything that's reqUiredwith respect to those violations. THE CHAIRMAN: I think that what has happened here is that Mr. Hass has proceeded on his own and has paid no attention to the building permit and has even finished off the upper floor of the main part of the building. That's a violation of the Housing Code, I guess, in a lot of ways. With regard to height, I think he's got some doorways'in there that are too short, for instance. ROBERT BERGEN: No cross ventilation. THE CHAIRMAN: And he's got cooking units ... I haven't se~n them because it was carefully screened when we were out there, we walked around and looked and we couldn't Bee in the Windows what's inside the building. But it's stated in the violation that a kitchen~ unit has been installed in the garage which was supposed to have been detached which, in effect, makes it a two-family house. Regardless of how lightly you treat a kitchen unit, it's still, in effect, a two-family house for our purposes and we've been upheld in tkis. Southold Town Board of Appeals July 14, 1977 STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: We're not against removing it if that's a condition in the granting of the application. THE CHAIRMAN: It would certainly be one thing. I think another thing would be the removal of the breezeway. Another t~ing would be to make the main part of the structure conform with the building application, although that's not strictly our problem. STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: I think that it essentially does, there weren't any elevations filed with respect to that. THE CHAIRMAN: What has he got, a full second floor up there? We couldn't see it. STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: If that's a problem, certainly we'd be ~ery happy to make the place available for the inspection of the Board any time you want to go there. THE CHAIRMAN: We don't have to act on that if you say there is no second floor to this property. STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: There's a stairway up there. THE CHAIRMAN: He must have had some purpose for having a stairway up %here. STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: Yes, he's finished it off. THE CHAIRMAN: Finished it off completely, huh? STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: I'm not sure about that, I don't think so. He got a carpeted stairway going up ... THE CHAIRMAN: YOU know, if he'd applied for that in the beginning, I would think that there's no reason why the Board ... but whether he's got problems there with height, you've got all kinds of height irequirements in an upstairs room, interior doorways and door~-~f~'~s, STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: The only one Mr. Terry called particularly to my attention is the one that went from the main floor of the larger building fnto the breezeway. I don't know whether he specified that in the letter, but that's the only one he called to my attention. THE CHAIRMAN: That's the only one he mentioned to me. STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: Well, we can close that up. THE CHAIR/~AN: Well, I think that if the Board is going to act on this tonight, we should require the elimination of the kitchen unit and the changing of the garage from part of the main house to an accessory building as originally proposed in the Southold Town Board of Appeals -24- July 14, 1977 building application and eliminating the breezeway. As to what else he might have to do, I don't know if there's anything else except in connection with the Housing Code and the State Housing Code. The building the way it is has no back yard, no side yards to speak off. STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: It has a substantial side yard on the west side. THE CHAIRMAN: The west side? I thought there was more on the east side than the~e was on the west. Does that fence divide the two properties? He's got a split rail fence up there. STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: On the survey by Van Tuyl dated March 4 of this year he indicates that the main dwelling seems to be in the middle of the lot so far as both east, west, and south sides are concerned. It's approximately the same. THE CHAIRMAN: It's pretty hard to tell how big the main dwelling is on this. STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: On the floor plan, I don't know whether that's available to the Board or not, it indicated that the ... THE CHAIRMAN: 28' by 36', wasn't it? STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: Yes, 28' by 36'. THE CHAIRMAN: And then he's added what looks like a sun porch out here which makes it 28' by 46' STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: On the south side, I think not. I think that was included, wi don't think that there's any urgency that this application be acted on tonight. I would certainly extend to the Board an opportunity for any cooperation they might ask. I can arrange for the Board to inspect the house at your convenience. THE CHAIRMAN: I don't know if it's so necessary for our Board because those interior violations are pretty much up to the Building Inspector under the Housing Code. It's more the exterior that we're concerned with, so I think that we can act on it, unless ~o~d rarer we didn't. I think that the Board should require the removal of the kitchen facilities and separation of the garage from the main house by eliminating the breezeway. I believe, from the Zoning standpoint, that would cover us. STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: I think I indicated in the application that the breezeway now does carry the elecb~icity for the electri- cally heated house. You have indicated to me that you feel as though you can't act upon an application that hasn't been made. Let's assume that you were to grant the application on those con- ditions. I suspect that we would like to go back to the Building Inspector and at least be able to keep a roof between the two $outhold Town Board of Appeals ~25~ July 14, 1977 structures to continue to carry the electrical units. Then, if he turns it down, we might be back on that one. THE CHAIPd~AN: Those would normally be buried, any electrical stuff. It isn!t as though Hass is totally naive about Zoning, we have here 11 occasions when he's been in here before, or you've been in here for him, concerning signs, front yard setback for the motel, front yard setback, permission to put a sign on property, directional signs, wall-sign for Town Beach Motel, permission to divide lots with insufficient width and area, and several others. He isn't totally ignorant of Zoning. STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: On the contrary, he's very much aware of it. He doesn't understand it, but he's aware of it. THE CHAIRMAN: He probably knows more about it than I do. If you wish, I'm sure we'd be glad to recess this if you want to make an additional application to the Building Inspector or what- ever you want to try. STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: Before you recess it, there are other people in the room, maybe somebody would like to speak in opposition to the application. THE CHAIRMAN: I was going to do that. Are you finished? STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: Yes. THE CHAIRMAN: Are there any other questions of Mr. Corwin speaking for the application? (There was no response.) Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against the application? (There was no response.) I was told there would be an attorney here for the Ruch Estate. VA~ENTIN~E RUCH: I'm here for the Ruch Estate, but I see no objection ~to' the side yard if the buildings are separated. THE CHAIRMAN: You see no objection if the two buildings are separated, is that what you said? VALENTINE RUCH: Yes. THE CHAIRMAN: Is that your princip~objection? $outhold Town Board of Appeals July 14, 1977 VALENTINE RUCH: No, that's not what I came down here for, but you had mentioned before that the Building Inspector's office is undermanned and I would think this would indicate to you and to them that they should ha~e someone else to follow up on these violations. ~here are a few, but %here are less violations than there are applications. I think that they should be followed up more by the Building Inspectors of the Town. When something is seen that is wrong, it should be corrected before it's completed and perhaps more inspections should be made. THE CHAIRMAN: Well, you run into some interesting problems With your suggestions. One, of course, is the Town Board who resist hiring any more people or paying anybody any more money, no matter what they do. Another is, you run into resistance, we do, with the Building Inspector as to how he can best devote his time, apply his time. Those are some of the problems but there's still a third, philosophical problem. It seems to me if we get everybody running around here checking on everybody about every- thing, it's bad enough now. I heard of a meeting in New York on August 3rd in connection with the Environmentalists that actually proposes that all farm roads be blacktopped, this is one of the p~oposals. (The Chairman further discussed the proposed law.) That's the philosophical part of it where I think that the TOwn runs pretty good the way it is. Sure, we try to catch all the things that are done wrong in the Towns For instance, right next to this house that we're talking about there's a garage ... VALENTINE RUCH: That garage was built more than two years ago. THE CHAIRMAN: Yes. Right next to this house, directly north of it, is a house with a large garage which apparently is being. used as a separate living quarters~ It looked to me as if there were six or eight Children there and several adults. Obviously a two-family situation on about 10,000 sq. ft We're doing the best we can~ Skip, but we can't catch everythingl ' STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: Mr. Radford made the same point, you were having a discussion with him about the inspections and it's true. In Hass' case he has the same difficulty with Howard Terry, he's blaming Howard for letting him go as far as he did and Howard, of course, says "You're supposed to call me when you're ready for one.ii THE CHAIRMAN: Anyone else wish to speak against this application? (There was no response.) On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was Southold Town Board of Appeals July 14, 1977 RESOLVED that the public hearing upon application._6f Helmut Hass, Appeal No. 2308, be RECESSED to August 4, 1977, at 7:30 P.M. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Grigonis, Doyen. Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Gillispie, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals GRANT per- mission to the American Legion Auxiliary to hold an Antique Flea Market on Saturday, August 13, 1977 (Rain ~ate August 14) subject to the condition that posters can be erected no sooner than two weeks prior to the event and must be removed within the week following the event. Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. Seven (7) Sign Renewals were reviewed and approved as submitted~ On motion by Mr. Doyen, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that the next meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals be held at 7:30 P.M. (E.D.S.T.), Thursday, August 4, 1977, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, DOyen. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED thaU a special meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals be held at ll:0O A.M. (E.D.S.T.), Friday, July 22, 1977, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis. The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) Southold Town Board of Appeals July 14, 1977