The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1313 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 1313 Dated January 8, 1970 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To Eva Main Peconic Bay Blvd. Mattituck) New York DATE.~&nlla~y 22,197~C · Appellant at a meeting of th~ Zoning Board of Appeals on ' was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your ( ) Request for variance due to lack of access to property ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance (X) Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) the appeal 1. SPECIAI,, EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board if was determined that a special exception ( ) be granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article .................... Section .................... Subsection .................... paragraph .................... of the Zoning Ordinance and the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) be confirmed because 7:30 P.M. (B.a.T.), upon application of Eva Main, Peconic Bay BlVd., Matt'ituck, New York, fox a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 303, and Article X, Section 1000~, for permission to divide lots with reduced area. Location of property: east side of Goldin Lane, Southolc~, New York, bounded north by Soundview Avenue, east by Laakso Bros., Inc., south by Middle R~)ad, west by Goldin Lane. 2. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (~vould not) produce practical hardship because SEE REVERSE difficulties or unnecessary (b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because SEE REVERSE (c) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) change the character of the district because SE~ REVERSE (would not) and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( that the previous decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed. SEE REVERSE ) be denied and FORM ZB4 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ;~~ Secretary Seuthold Town Board of Appeals After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to divide lots with reduced area. The cottage on Lot % 10 is now within four (4) feet of the side line. The applicant wishes to shirt, the side lines on all lots 10 feet to the south so that all lots will c6nfrom to the Ordinance in regard to frontage and sideyards. The Board is ~n agreement with the reasoning of the applicant. This variance will not change the surface or the location of the buildings. The granting of this variance will improve the area rather than depreciate it. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by br. Bergen, it was RESOLVED Eva Main, Peconic' B~ BYrd,% ~attituck, New York be GRA~U permission to ~ivide lots' withreduc~ area as applied for on -3_D~ope~ty located oh east side o'f Goldin.Lan,e, Southold, Ne~ York. 'Vote' ~f the Board:. Ayes: ~essrs~ Gillis~ie, Bergen, Grigonis, Hulse. Notice of Hearings Pursuant to Section 267 of the T~m Law and the provisions of the amended Building Zone Ord~mnce of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County. lfew York, publ:tc hoarXng~ ~lll bo held by tho Zoning Board of Appeelo off the T~un of Southold, et the TOMe O££XCe, Main Road, Southold, He~ York, on January 22, 1970 on the relieving appeal; ~n 303, ~d ~r ~ (2) ~F~V~ COP~ n~d ~ suf~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK / ss: STATE OF NEW YORK j S~I~ICE OF llEA~G$ Pursuant to Sect~n Z6~ of the ~ ~w ~d t~ pro~ons of ~e a~ B~g Z~ ~e of ~e ~ 5f ~uth- ~, S~ Cowry, New pubic he~ ~ ~ ~d ~ Z~g ~ of Ap~ls of ~e T~ o~ ~uthold, at the ~ Offi~, ~ ~d, ~uth- ~d, N~ Y~k, on J~ 19~ on t~ ~Bo~ appel: ~:~ p. ~ (~), u~n appli- ~v~, ~t~tuc~ N~ Yor~, for ~g ~, ~i~e III, ~ ~A, for ~on to ~de lo~ ~th r~u~d ~ea ~ of ~o~y: e~t ~ ~ ~e, ~uthold, New y~ ~ ne~h by ~- ~ A~, e~t by ~a~ ~., ~c., ~uth by ~d~e ~d, ~ by ~l~n ~e. ~ ~ d~ to ~ ~ at t~ t~e DAa'~: J~Y ~, 19T0 ~ O~ O~ ~ BOA~ OF ~E~ 1T--15 C. Whitney Booth, Jr., being duly sworn, says that he is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLARID TRAVELER - MATTITUCK WATCHMAN, a public news- paper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is o printed copy, has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Mottituck Watch- successively, commencing on the ..... . .~....~..'~. ............. Swom to before me this ........ Z..(.: ......... day of Notary Public ADELE PAYNE Nofsry Pu!lc S?, of New ¥0~ Commission Expires March 30, 197J~ LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Hearings ~ Pursuant to Section 267 of the town Law and the provisions of the amended Building Zone Or- dinence of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, public hearings will be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold, at the Town Of- rice, Main Road, Southold, New York, on January 22, 1970 on the following appeal: 7:30 P.M. (E:S.T.), upon ap- Plication of Eva Main, Peconic Bay Blvd., Mattituck, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article/II, Section 303, and Article X, Sec- tion I~0A, for permission to divide lois with reduced area. Location of property: east side of Goldin Lane, Southold, New York, bounded north by Sound- view Avenue, east by Laakso Bro~., Inc,, south Road, west by Goldi2y Middle Any Person desiring ~ be heard on the above apglica~iou should appear at the time and place specified. DATED: JANUARy 8, 1970 BY ORDER OF _lTJal6 BOARD OF APPEALS COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ] STATE OF NEW YORK, ~ ss: · ..,.5..~c.~.~4£i~...~., ./~, .~..~.-v.~. f.~..~..., being duly Sworn, says that ... !~.*.~. · is Printer and Publisher ~f the SUFFOLK WEEKLY TIMES, a newspaper published at Greenport, in said county; and that the noticE, of which the ,annexed is a printed copy, has been published in the s~id Suffolk Weekl~/ Times once in each week, ~or ..... .~..~.~-~ ................ week~ successively commencing on the . ./¢~.~..~.~:.:.~?. ~C~..~_ ....... day of . . . :~.<~.,. ~-.~-c',~.x.~.~,.. 19.? ~ ~ _ '. ~ .... -,A~ ~ ....... '~ ~ .~.' ~, '~.~ :L. .......... Sworn to before me this .../.(<.6~... | clay of .... ~<-;~.~.~.~.:,~... 19:?~. ! · ............ F. LAN(;TON COR\\TM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD :BUILDING DEPAETMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD. N. ~OT~CE OF DISAPPROVAL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your .application dated ................. ~ap~r~ ...... ~ ...... 19....~.Q ,fo~:permit to ~t ..]~:i.~.~4~.-.~-~ ........ at the pram]ses located at ..... ~-~ ................... : .............................................. Street ~OUt,,hoXa ~,~, Map ~ ~::.~.~.%~.~ ................... Block ............. ~ ....................... Lot ................................................. is ~_~~t~k,~ ' ~ disapproved on the followin~ grounds ....... ~.~;~...~$..~..xte~c.e~ & ~ ,..,~..~e~...~Fe~a., a~..a.~a..~,~..~.a~.~..~...~,~.a~z ..~...ac~i~..~...~3~. .... ~e~,.. ~,..~.. ~.~'~, ........................................................................................................................ OWN or SOUT OLD, ¥O.K APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. of ( ( ) Name of Appelbn,t Street and Number ~a%~i%-uok ' ' lkTew York HEREBy" APPEAL TO Municipality ^ State ~ ~ R BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILD~/N~'-- IN~ISECTO ON THE ZONING APPLICATION kUk k~:~lI INU ..................................... WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO ...~. ~, ~i~ ............................. Name of Applicant for permit ........................ Street and Number Municipality State ) PERMIT TO USE PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY 1. LOC,~T]ON OF THE PROPERTY ..e..g~..-b.....~.~.e.....~...o..],~...~.~O.%...e.~....~o2,z.-b. ho.l.~. I~.i.s'b.:..~... Street Use District on Zoning Map Map No. Lot No. 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordi,nance.) Sec~io~ ~03~ Article X~ Sec~io~ 1000~ 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (~) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to. lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons, Laws Art. 1~6 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 ' 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (has) (k~[:~ been made with respect, to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit (L~) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No...~.,~.~. ........................ Dated .... .~..e..~...~..~.~..z~....~..~....~.~.~; .......................... REASON FOR APPEAL ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 X) A Variance to t~e Zoning Ordinance is requested for ~he reaso~ ~ha~ aC ~he ~ime )of ~he 1959 Variamce~ ~e~i¢iomer had plamme~ ¢o co~sL-ruc¢ duplex toe,ages om ~he lo~s where ~he small co~a~es were located. La~er~ ~e~i~iomer ~f~P~ decided ~o'b %0 go alomg wi~h ~his program cud mow plams ~o sell Che ~wo simgle Cottages a~ud also Che duplex om ~iddle Road. Umder ~he presem~ ~raris~ce~ ~he ad~age om Lo~ No. I0 is wi~b~- four (~) fee~ of ¢he lime. ~e%itiomer mow asks %ha% all the !o¢ side 14~es be shifCed 10 fee¢ ¢o Che south so Chat all lo%s will ha~e 100 fee% or more from~i~g om .Gold~u Lame amd all buildI~gs will have adequate side li~es. l~o~'m Z~St (Continue on other side) -! REASON FOR APPEAL Continued 1.- STRICT APPLICATION .OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because -[;[he co-bf:;age on I~o-b I~To, 10 .~Tozzld have an -~'nacteq2~af;e side l~,e since Che distance is £o~r (~) fee¢. Attacked ~eme~o is a sZ~Vey prepared by Van T~yl ~ Son~ show~mg ~he present location o£ the co~a~es. ~he red lines represen~ ~zaria~ce limes gra~ed ~m'Febr~ary 1959- ~he black li~es scad ~he areas sho~ re£er to ~he parcels as mow pmoposed. 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because -[:;he coJ;-bage on I~of:; lifo, l0 does no~ correspond ~o Zoai ~,g Re~ations. 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because nO change is made in Che area~ 1;here is only a sligh~ shif~ ~n side l~s. STATE OF~NEW YORI~ ) ) ss COUNTY OF SU-I~OI~K) ~a 1~I. ~ain Signature -- Z