The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1392 TOW~ OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YOI~K ACTION OF THE ZONING BOAI~D OF APPEALS Appea~ No. 1392 Dated December 2. 1970 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To Harold Kober Eastwood Drive Extension & Holden Avenue Cutchogue, New York DATE.P~.~.~.~.~. 19'(0 Appellant at a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on De c e tuber 17, was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your ( ) Request for variance due to lack' of access to property ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance (X) Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) 1970 the appea! 1. SPECIAL F_~(CEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a special exception ( ) be granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article .................... Section .................... Subsection .................... paragraph .................... of the Zoning Ordinance and the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) be confirmed becaus~ 7930 P.M. (E.S.T.), upon application of Harold Kober, Eastwood B~ive Extension & Holden Avenue, Cutchogue, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection (6), and Article III, Section 309, for permission to construct accessory building in sideyard area with insufficient setback. Location of property: Eastwood Drive Extension & Holden Avenue, Lot # 24 of Eastwood Estates, Section II, Fleets Neck, Cutchogue, New York. Fee paid $5.00. 2. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) produce hardship because SEE REVERSE practical difficulties or unnecessary (b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because ~EE REVERSE (c) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) change the character of the district because (would not) and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( ) be denied and that the previous decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be cenfirmed ( ) be reversed. FORM ZB4 SEE REVERSE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS / Ma~Jo~'ie McDermott, Secretary Southold Town Board of Appeals After invest~tion and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to construct accessory building in sideyard 'area with insufficient Setback. The location of cesspools prevents the garage from being located any further to the rear of the property. The lot is triangular, facing on two streets; cesspools are in the center of the rear yard. The setback will be comparable to other homes in.the area. The Board agrees with the reasoning of the applicant The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would nOtbe shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change~ the~character' of the neighborhood and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. THEREFORE, IT WAS RESOLVED Harold Kober, Eastwnod Drive Extension & Holden Avenue, Outchogue, New York, be GRANTED permissi~ to construct accessory building in sideyard area' with insufficient setback on property located: Eastwood Drive Extension & Holden Avenue, Cutchogue, New York, as applied for. Vote of the Board: Hulse. Ayes:- MessrS: Gillispie, Bergen, GrigOnis, BJJ~dm st. mm~, mmf~ by L. %. moAlm'oed Cempmmy, veo~ ]my &. mkmmddm mammm m~ ,t~m~ m m ~ mlpmma~mo& NOTICE OF HEA~INGS Pursuant to Sect:on 207 bi the Town Law and the provisions of the amended ~'qilding Zone Ordinance of ti~e own of South- old. Suffolk County, New York. public hearings will be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold, at the Tbwn Office, Main Road, South- old, New York. on December 17, 1970 on the following appeals: 7:90 P. M. (EST), upon appli- cation of Harold Kober, East- wood Drive Extension & Holden Avenue, Cutchogue, New York, faf' a variance in accordance with lhe Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300. Subsection (6~. and Article III, Section 309~ for permission to construct accessory building in sideyard area ~ith insufficient setback Location of property: Eastwood Drive Exten- sion & Holden Avenue, Lot No. 24 of Eastwood Estates, Section II. Fleets Neck, Cutchogue, New York. 7:40 P. M. ~EST~, upon appli- cation of Chester Orlowski, Po- quash Avenue, Cutchogue, New York a/c Jame~ Manning, Jack- son Street, New Suffolk, New York. tar a variance in accord- ance with the Zoning Ordinance. Article III, Section 300, Subsec- tion ~6). and Article III. Section 309, for permission to construct accessory building in [rontyard area. Location of property: south side of Jackson Street, New Suf- folk, New York, bounded north by Jackson Street, east by John p. Manning, south by Peconic Bay, west by E. Marvin. 8:00 P. M. (EST). upon appli- cation of Dri-Gen Realty Corp., North Oakwood Road, Laurel. Ne~v York, for a variance in ac- cordance with the Zoning Ordi- nance, Article X, Section 1008 (last paragraphh for permission to use subdivision for multiple residence dwellings with increas- ed density. Location of property: (Map of Greenport Homes~ south side of Main Road, Greenport. New York, bounded north by Main Road, e~st by Ninth Street, south by L. I. Railroad Company. west by A. Cassidy. Any person desiring to be heard on the above applications should appear at the time and place specified. DATED: DECEMBER 3, 1970 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS iT--10 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ! STATE OF NEW YORKI ss: C. Whitney Booth, Jr., being duly sworn, says that he is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER - MA'VFITUCK WATCHMAN, a public news- paper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Long Island Zroveler-Mattituck Watch- man once each week for ........ ~.f.~..~:~-~i~.....(...../.'~./. week~ s~ccessively, commencing on the ............. ~..~. ..................... day ~ ( -:3 o ......... ............ ..:.., Sworn to before me this ...... c'./.~... .......... day of ....... A ....... c....~ ............. , 19.~/..~. LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Hearings Pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the Wov/sions of the amended Building Zone Ordinance-of the Town of Seathold, Suffolk County, New York, p~blic hearin~ will he held by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold, at the Town Office, Mnin P,o~l, Southold, New York, on December 17, 1~70 on the folinwi~ appeals: _ 7:30 P.M. (E.S.T~, upon ap- plication of. Harold Kober, Eastwood Drive Extension & Helden Avenue, Cutchogue, New York, for a variance in ac- cordance with file Zoning Or- d/n~mce, Article III, Section ~00, Subsection (6), and Article HI, Section ~09, for permission to construct accessor~ buildin_g in sideyard area with insofficient setback. Location of Wap~ty: F-,~stwnsd Dr/ye Extension & Holden Avenue, Lot No. 24 of E~twoed Estates, Section .H, Fle~s Neck, Cuchon/~e, New York. 7:~0 P.M. (E.S.T.), upon ap- pi/cation of Chestee Orinwski, Pequash Avenue, Cutchogue, New York a/c James Mannth~, J~cknon Sheet, New Suffolk, New York, for a varianea in accordance with the Zoning Ord/cance, Article IH, Section ~0o, S~l~ection (6), and Article III, Section ~, for permission to construct aceasacr~, hefld/~ in frontyard area. Location of Woperty: south side of Jack,an S~eet, New Suffolk, New York, bounded north by Jeckson Street, e~st by John P. Manning, south by Peeanic Bay, west by E. Marv/n. 8:~ P~M. (E.S.T.), upon ap- plication of Dri-Gen Realty Corp., North'Oakwoed Road, Laurel New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordthance, Art/cie X, Section l~0~ (l~st par~grap/l), far per-' mission to uso subdiv/sion for .multiple re~/deace dwellings with more~sed density. Location of ~roperty: (Map of Greaaport IIomes) south side of Main Hoad, Grecnpert, New York, bouhded north by Main Eoad, east by Ninth Street, south by L.I. Haflrcad Company, west by A. C~sid~. Any person des~.in~ to bo heard on the above ap~licatinns should appear at the time and piaco spec/fled. DATED: DECEMBER 3, 1970 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN "BOAP, D OF APPEALS 1TOll COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, STATE O~' NEW YORK, ~ ss: --. ~-~-~. · .~..'. ~. ~. ~:q~.~.~..~.~.... being duly Sworn, s~rys that ...~.~., is Printer and Publisher ~of the SUFFOLK 'tVEEKLY TIldES, a newspaper published at Greenport, in said county; and thai the notice, ~f which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in the /mid Suffolk Weekly Times ~nce in each week, for ....... .~z..~.~.~.z ............. weel~ s~iccessiveIy commencing on ~he . .~.~ .~.~.~..~_.C.g.¥ ......... of .. 97.e. Sworn to before me this . .[(..~.~.. ... .......... FOH, M ~O. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. ROTICE OF DISAPPROVAL File No ................................................................ Date ......................D.~C. ............... 2 ................. 19....~.0 To .~.r..o.],.d.....K...o..b..~.r. ................................................. .......... ~azt~ood,..D~-. E~& &..Hot~e.n..~ve .................. C~tchaglm ...... ~..k. ......................... PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated ............... D.~C.....:] .................... 19....70 .~or permit to construct .l~V.t...~Fa~l~ ............. at thc premises located at ..... ]~ld-e~l..A¥~ .& ....B~at~oocl.,~r..E~t .............................. Street Fleets Neck, Cutchogue Map Eas.t~ood...t~s.ta. tes...Block ...... $ec..-][~ ................. Lot .2~ ......................................... is ]~~l~ disappruved on the followin,~ ground~ · -~or"-a¢ ce~ s~y-'.bld g ...................... &~t...t-I.]~.-.sect.,....30~..~ub-6. '&"'~ee'~'"'~09 ............ ....... ........... ............ Building Inspector' " 'row SOUT O:. , APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 1, (We) ,~...~..q../':..~....~.'.......~.~....~....'~..-~--...(~... .............. of ......... ~".~....~.f..-~....~...~...~...,~.../.-~..."~../...~....'~ff. .................... Name of Appellant Street and Number .....~.....~..../.'~..,C,..,~,...~...~..~.,~.. ........................................................... ..,,,~...,..,~..~ .......... HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO ...... . .~....O..,.~..~..~... ~. DATED ....... /,...~.,.':~'.7...~..? ......................... WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO Map No. Lot No. Name of Applicant for permit of ........... ~..4~Z-!~.~.~....../.,?...~.~.~ ....... ~.~Z~,~...,?..~ ........ ...,':~_....,~... .......... Street and Number Municipality State ) PERMIT TO USE ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY ...~M.~.....~......~.......~.....~...~.....~..~...:~......~...: .......... Street Use District on Zoning Map 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance .by number· Do not quote the Ordinance.) CL,~,,-'-~-~ ,,~-x~3oo -~C_~ ~; ~ ,.¢.~c- ~o~ 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for ( ~ A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal ~(has not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No ................................. Dated ...................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection (~ A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) is requested for the reason that: /~) ~orm ~]3! (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEAL Continu~i 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties o~ ~mne~es sory HARDSHIP because 2. The hardshio created is UNI(~UE and is not shared by ali properties alike ~r~ the ~mnqediel~ vicinity of this property and in this use district because 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT HANdlE ~f'~: CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because STATE OF NEW YORK ) ss COUNTY OF Signature