The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-128.-6-13.3 OFFICE LOCATION: OF SO(/TyO MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex 1p P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 G Telephone: 631 765-1938 �Iy,rDUN TY,� LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman,Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry,AICP Assistant Town Planning Director LWRP Coordinator Date November 3,2021 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for ZBA File Ref DAVID AND LISA CIFARELLI#7551 SCTM# 128-6-13.3 DAVID AND LISA CIFARELLI#7551 -Request for Variances from Article XXIII, Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's July 1,2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to demolish an existing dwelling and construct a single-family dwelling;at; 1)located less than the code required minimum side yard setback of 10 feet on two side yards; located at:2674 Peconic Bay Blvd(Adj.to Peconic Bay),Laurel,NY. SCTM No. 1000-128-6-13.3 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268,Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program(LWRP)Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department,as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the action is INCONSISTENT with the below listed Policy Standard and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. 4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards. A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding and erosion hazards. The proposed addition on the west side of the residence would be located within a FEMA 0.2 percent annual chance flood hazard zone. The proposed eastern addition is located further seaward than the existing structure and lessens the required 100' Chapter 275 Wetlands and Shoreline setback.The addition of structure in these areas could result in damage and loss over time from storm events; including hurricanes. Pursuant to Chapter 268,the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: William Duffy,Town Attorney BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ®��®F S®V� 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 ® Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. ® p� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento lyCou TiSouthold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONINGTOWN OF ODUTHOLD LS KE C E Ill Tel.(631) 765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 JUL 2 2 2029 So Iht c�d Town July 22, 2021 Planning Board Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold,NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. #7551 Cifarelli, David & Lisa Dear Mark: We have received an application to construct demo to existing dwelling and rebuild new dwelling. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map, project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-5D is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman Chairper By: Encl. Survey/Site plan: AMP Architecture, July 15, 2021 FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD \/ BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD,N.Y. NOTICE OF(DISAPPROVAL DATE: July 1, 2021 TO: AMP Architecture(Cifarelli) 1075 Franklinville Road Laurel,NY 11948 Please take notice that your application received June 24,2021: For permit to: Construct demo to existing-dwelling and rebuild new at: Location of property: 2674 Peconic Bay Blvd Laurel NY County Tax Map No. 1000—Section 128 Block 6 Lot 13.3 (formers 13 1) Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this nonconforming 16,749 sq ftparcel in the Residential R-40 District,is not permitted-pursuant to Article XXIII Section 280-124 which states: lots measuring less than 20,000 s .ft.in total size require a minimum side yard setback of 10 feet. The proposed site plan shows a minimum side yard setback of 2.9 feet(east), and an additional side yard setback of 8.2 feet,(north) Authorized Signature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file,Z.B.A. Fee:$ Filed By: Assignment No. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE House No.2674 Street Peconic Bay BLVD Hamlet Laurel SCTM 1000 Section 128 Block 06 Lot(s)13.3 Lot Size 16,749 SF Zone R40 NC I(WE)APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED July 1, 2021 BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED June 24, 2021 Owner(s):David & Lisa Cifarelli Mailing Address:2674 Peconic Bay BLVD, Laurel, NY 11948 Telephone:631-298-5500 Fax: Email:lisa@ccwindows.net NOTE:In addition to the above,please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agent,architect, builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative:AMP Architecture for(X)Owner( )Other:�T Address: 1075 Franklinwlle Road,Laurel,N.Y.11948 Telephone:516-214-0160 Fax: Email:imagee@amparchrtect.com Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to,from the above names. ( )Applicant/Owner(s), (C)Authorized Representative, ( ) Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED June 24, 2021 and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED June 24,2021 FOR: (�Building Permit ( ) Certificate of Occupancy ( )Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ( ) Change of Use ( )Permit for As-Built Construction ( )Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article,Section,Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers.Do not quote the code.) Article: XXIII Section: 280-124 Subsection: Type of Appeal: An Appeal is made for: (X)A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( )A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ( )Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ( )Reversal or Other A prior appeal( )has, ()�has not been made at any time with respect to this property,UNDER Appeal No(s). Year(s). . (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our office for assistance) Name of Owner: ZBA File# REASONS FOR APPEAL (Please be specific, additional sheets maybe used with preparer s signature notarized): 1.An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted,because: All properties along the shoreline in this neighborhood have been developed. The proposed renovation maintains a single family residence 2.The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance,because: The exsiting footprint of the building is an existing non-conforming setback from the side yards 3.The amount of reIief requested is not substantial because: The proposed side yard variances requested are not substantial because the existing setbacks are both under the required 10' 4.The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: The proposed work is consistent with the development of all neighboring properties 5.Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? { }Yes,or W No Why: The proposed work is to renovate what exists Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land? N No { } Yes(please furnish a copy) This is the NIlNIMUM that is necessary and adequate,and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent • (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) Swom be re rpe this �� day Of 20 al Votary Public BARBARA H.TANDY Notary.Pubiio,State Of_NewYork No. 01`TAemoo1 Qualified to Suffolk County Commission Expires 01/13/20 APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: AMP Architecture DATE PREPARED: 07/15/21 1.For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: Existing roof and second floor will be removed Exisitng shed at side of home to be removed II.New Construction Areas(New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension•. 915 SF Total Extensions; Please see layout for extension dimensions Dimensions of new second floor: 59'-3"x27'-8"Second Floor; 18'-6"x31'-1"Second Story Balcony Dimensions of floor above second level: N/A Height(from finished ground to top of ridge): 31.8' Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed?If yes,please provide height(above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: Existing to remain M.Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary).Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: Existing 2 Story Home with small window areas and closed off layout Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: Proposed 2 story home with open layout, second story balcony and enlarged window areas IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage(from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: 1,850 SF Proposed increase of building coverage: 5 5% Square footage of your lot: 16, 749 SF Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: 16.5% Proposed; 11% Existing V.Purpose of New Construction: Renovate home to utilize space more efficiently, create first floor master suite, install new IA Wastewater System &maximize views at site VI.Please describe the land contours(flat,slope%,heavily wooded,marsh area,etc.)on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): Flat land, bulkheaded at Bay side Please submit 8 sets of photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction,and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes X No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? X No Yes please explain on attached sheet. C. 1.)Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? Seaward of Bulkhead 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application?Yes 3.) Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area?Yes 4.) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction?Yes Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the TrusteesPermit Pending following ZBA Decisionand if issued,please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level?NO E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers,bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting?NO Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises?NO If yes,please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe:-- G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking,please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel?Yes If yes,please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. Provided on survey I. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel Single Family Residence w/ 1 Car attached garage and the proposed use Single Family Residence w/ 1 car attached garage (ex: existing single family,proposed: same with garage, pool or other) �Oe4&,& 7/19/21 Authorizdd signature and Date FORM No.a TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building inspector Town Hall Southold,N.Y. Certificate Of Occupancy No. . . - 210663 . . . . . . . . . . .September-4- 81. Date , ., I9 THIS CERTIFIES that the building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Location of Property 2650 Gt. Peconi.a Bay Blvd. Laurel, New York House 11l0. Street -Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section $ . . . . . . .Block . . . 46 . . . . . . . . .Lot :. . . 013 . 1. . - Subdivision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Filed Map No. . . . . . . . .Lot No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated April 29 81 , 19 . . pursuant to which Building Permit No. . 13;]28, Z - , , _ - - , . - , Building, dated . MaY. 5 . 19$1 . ,was issued,and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is . . . . . . . . . Garage Addition to Existing Dwelling: The certificate is issued to . . . , - -Victor E, Catalano loK%r7� eXdfi7lv��. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval . , , , , . .N/R - , UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. . .q??:7600. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . !. . , , . . I . , , . . . , . . . - Building Inspector . . . . . . . . . . . . Rev.1/81 i FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No. ...$1134............. Date .................11QT.lt1bo ....3iQ.. ... ., THIS CERTIFIES that the building located at ..9X-pet=AG-,Bpky,,,R,yd,,,••,••••,•,•,,,•• Street Map No. .a=. .......... Block No. . .. ...=. .... Lot No. .i=.....j+iiy>ciltl ..�..Sf«.. .... ............... .... conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated ............................... agt••,..3�•.••............. 19.& pursuant to which Building Permit No. ... .. dated ................•......... ........... 19..61,., was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is .•...... ............. r—VatO••o"••faint-y••1dve;1141 . ......................... .. ............ ............... ............... .... The certificate is issued to .......,T.... ,...C8Sd3tii38............Owner.........................................I....... (owner, lessee or tenant) of the aforesaid building. .... .............. .......... ....�.�...... ............... .... uilding Inspector FORM NO. 4 TOWN Of SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. CERTIFICATE OR OCCUPANCY .......... Date ...................QO -23............, 19..10. THIS CERTIFIES that the building located at SAL.f1&-RRA"AI>tIC-AW.-AMU .#�4treet bi�sl�1 MapNo. .......*Wgr....... Block No. ...........*&....*Lot No. ................ .t**............................................ conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated .................. .lDpfi ..1.6.............. ., 19. .$1 pursuant to which Building Permit No. .....1-3353 dated .........Mlp ><..33................ 19.....164 was issued,and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ........ ...........A.tVA! ..0�1.llllllLY.n11iLLI..... .................................................................................... _ The certificate is issued to ...............................J. ]I• Calduale. wan ................................................................................ (owner, lessee or tenant) of the aforesaid building. lc.t �Q rte_ .... ...... ................................................................... Building Inspecto FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No. kW............. Date ............................. .................... 10? . THIS CERTIFIES that the building located !F?!?,FtyStreef MapNo. .*.**................. Block No. ......*i.*.............Lot No. ....... ......... ............................................ conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated .......................... ............. 19J2.,pursuant to which Building Permit No.9.146.. dated ..................................... .�,...., 19...R.,was issued,and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is.............. MUTH ONE PA'ILI Y1ML This certificate is issued to . .1 and aa31 p i�ama5�............. . ................... (owner, lessee or tenant) of the aforesaid building. ........................ ... ....................................... Building Inspector HOWARD N. TM C e _ ... ...».. !.. ....r". .. ..... ..w •!..lv........»J�.�� r.sYl...4..... .r._...»..._n..•..r.u.Y.».....�..-.r.. �! .... .r.r..•r+n.• .+r.w.✓uu..L...Afrf w-au....+ .v.... TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK DATE 5,/.2&,/$.0. ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 2692 Dated April 16, 1980 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To Mr. Victor E. Catalano Appellant 22 Canterbury Drive Hauppauge, NY 11787 at a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on May 28, 1980 the appeal was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your ( ) Request for variance due to lack of access to property ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance Art. III, Section 100-31 C ) granted ( } be denied pursuant to Article .................... Section .................... Subsection .................... paragraph ......I............. of the Zoning Ordinance and the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) be confirmed because Application of VICTOR E. CATALANO, 22 Canterbury Drive, Hauppauge, New York 11787, for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance: (a) Article III, Section 100-31 for approval of road frontage; (b) Article III, Section 100-31 for approval of insufficient area due to proposed change in lot line[s] . Location of property: South side of Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel, New York; bounded north by Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, east by Pridgen, south by Peconic Bay and/or Catalano and Estate of A. Cardinale, west by Croce and Keller; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-128-6- 13.1, 13.2 and 13.3. (SEE REVERSE SIDE) 2. VARIANCE.By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship because (SEE REVERSE SIDE) (b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because (SEE REVERSE SIDE) (c) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) (would not) change the character of the district because (SEE REVERSE SIDE) After investigation and inspection, the Board finds that applicant is requesting approval of insufficient area due to a proposed change between proposed Lots 1 and 2 for a foot path, and approval of the existing insufficient width (or road front- age) . Upon inspection of the premises, the Board has found that the dwellings on Lots 1 and 2 are preexisting of the Town zoning ordinance, and that the width has also preexisted zoning. The Board during June 1974 granted approval of insufficient area in Appeal No. 1914, and it is the feeling of the Board that to deny the area variance requested herein would cause applicant extreme hardship or practical difficulties. However, it is also the feeling of the Board that no action is necessary in regard to the width variance inasmuch as the width has been existing prior to zoning. ' Y The Board finds that the circumstances present in this case are unique, and that strict application of the ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship. The Board believes that the granting of a variance in this case will not change the character of the neighborhood and will observe the spirit of the ordinance. On' motion by Mr. Grigonis, -seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was . 1 RESOLVED, that VICTOR E. CATALANO? 22 Canterbury Drive, Hauppauge, New York 11787, be GRANTED a Variance to the zoning Ordinance, Article II1, Section 100-31 Bulk Schedule, approving the insufficient area as applied for in Appeal No. 2692, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: That this matter be referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for its recommendations pursuant to the Suffolk County Charter, Section 1332 (a) . ' Location of property: South side of Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel, New York; bounded north by Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, east by Pridgen, south by Peconic Bay and/or 'Catalano and Estate of A. Cardinale, west by Croce and Keller; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-128-6-13.1, 13.2, 13.3 . Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill, Douglass, 'Goehririger. APPROVED. 9 go Dhairman Board of RECEIVED AND FILED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK 6/6/80 at 2:06 P.M. Qac��FFO��oG Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 7 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P.GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS,JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. JOSEPH H.SAWICKI JAMES DINIZIO,JR. ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3799; Application of VICTOR AND LINDA CATALANO FOR A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Sections 100-30 and 100-31 for permission to construct principal building for use as a poolhouse/cabana, accessory to adjoining residence, with an insufficient rearyard setback. Location of Property: South Side of Peconic Bay Boulevard and the west side of Private Right-of-way, Laurel, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 128, Block 6, Lot 13.1. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on December 8, 1988 in the Matter of the Application of VICTOR AND LINDA CATALANO under Appeal No. 3799; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is a corner lot located along the southerly side of Peconic Bay Boulevard and the westerly side of a private right-of-way, in the Hamlet of Laurel, Town of Southold, and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 128, Block 6, Lot 13.1. 2. The subject premises is identified on the Subdivision Map filed under Appeals No. 2692 rendered May 28, 1980, and under Appeal No. 1914 rendered June 13, 1974, grandfathered by the Planning Board September 23, 1980 {Section 106-531, as Lot No. 3, containing a total area of 13,727 sq. ft. Page 2 - Appl. No. 3799 Matter of VICTOR AND ADELINDA CATALANO Decision Rendered December 16, 1988 3. The subject premises is vacant land. 4. By this application, appellants request a variance from Article III, Section 100-30 and Section 100-31 for permission to locate a new principal building to be used as a poolhouse (cabana) accessory to the adjoining swimmingpool and residence to the south (on Lot No. 2) as more particularly depicted on the site plan map prepared by Craig Coronato, Landscape Architect, dated August 30, 1988. The building is proposed of a size 16' : by 24' , located approximately 20 feet from the westerly property line, 35 feet from the easterly (front) property line, and approximately 10 feet from the southerly property line (see landscape plan) . 5. Article III, Section 100-30 of the Zoning Code permits one-family dwellings on a lot, and Section 100-32 pertains to accessory uses or buildings incidental to principal use existing on the lot. The premises is vacant, and the use of the poolhouse (cabana) will not include the minimum requirement of 850 sq. ft. of liveable floor area for a single-family dwelling. 6. For the record, it is noted that the premises was the subject of prior applications rendered: (a) under Appeal No. 1914 on June 13, 1974, and (b) under Appeal No. 2692 on May 28, 1980. 7. In considering this application, the Board also finds and determines: ' (a) there is no other alternative available for appellants to pursue other than a variance; (b) the variance requested is uniquely related to the property and will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; (c) the variance requested is the minimal necessary to afford relief; (d) the variance will not in turn be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town, or be adverse to neighboring properties; (e) in view of all of the above factors, the 1Page 3 - Appl. No. 3799 Matter of VICTOR AND ADELINDA CATALANO Decision Rendered December 16, 1988 ; interests of justice will be served by granting the relief, as requested and conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Sawicki, seconded by Mr. Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT a Variance to locate new poolhouse/cabana structure upon this vacant lot for uses accessory and incidental to the adjoining residence and swimmingpool, in the Matter of Appeal No. 3799 for VICTOR AND LINDA CATALANO, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The subject cabana/poolhouse/storage building, if converted for residential use, shall conform to all setback , provisions of the Zoning Code for a principal dwelling; 2. Deck and patio areas not be roofed; 3. Showers and/or bathroom area doors shall be located on the outside wall of building. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Sawicki, and Dinizio. (Absent was: Member Serge Doyen, due to serious family illness. ) This resolution was duly adopted. Ik GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN : tT- D A.-I-ID FILED BY LD 10 114 C1.12-K DRiu41-212 3�6� I=.CUH �� r r A "'• , -own - Clerl; Town a i 1 5 Southold T own Board of A eels. MAIN ROAD STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER,CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS,JR. SERGE DOYEN,JR. JOSEPH H.SAWICKI JAMES DINIZIO,JR. ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3800: Application of VICTOR AND LINDA CATALANO FOR A Variance to the zoning ordinance, Article III, Section 100-32 for permission to locate swimmingpool, accessory to the existing residence, in an area other than the required rearyard. Location of Property: West Side of Private Right-of-way extending off the South Side of Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, section 128, Block 6, Lot 13.2. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on December 8, 1988 in the Matter of the Application of VICTOR AND LINDA CATALANO under Appeal No. 3800; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is located along the westerly side of a private right-of-way, which extends off the south side of Peconic Bay Boulevard 171.77 feet, in the Hamlet of Laurel, Town of Southold, and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 128, Block 6, Lot 13.2. 2. The subject premises is identified on the Subdivision Map filed under Appeals No. 2692 rendered May 28, 1980, and under Appeal No. 1914 rendered June 13, 1974, grandfathered by the Planning Board September 23, 1980 {Section 106-53}, as Lot No. 2, containing a total area of 15,075 sq. ft. Page 2 - Appl. No. 3800 Matter of VICTOR AND ADELINDA CATALANO Decision Rendered December 16, 1988 3. The subject premises is improved with a single-family, one-story frame and stucco house set back approximately five inches from the westerly property line, approximately 29 feet from the southerly property line, 105+- feet from the northerly property line, and 37+- feet from the front easterly property line. 4. By this application, appellants request a variance from Article III, Section 100-32 for permission to locate a new pool accessory swimmingpool with fence enclosure as more particularly depicted on the site plan map prepared by Craig Coronato, Landscape Architect, dated August 30, 1988. The pool is proposed of a size 20 ft. by 40 ft. and is shown to be set back i a minimum of 35 feet from the easterly front property line, - generally centered between the westerly and easterly property lines, hugging the most northerly yard area. 5. Article III, Section 100-32 of the Zoning Code provides that accessory buildings and uses be located in the required rear yard area. 6. Due to the location of the preexisting principal dwelling structure and the location of the private right-of-way to the lot, the premises has technically no rear yard area. F 7. For the record, it is noted that the premises was the subject of prior applications rendered: (a) under Appeal No. 1914 on June 13, 1974, and (b) under Appeal No. 2692 on May 28, 1980. 8. In considering this applicat}on, the Board also finds and determines: (a) there is no other alternative available for appellants to pursue other than a variance; (b) the variance requested is uniquely related to the property and will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; (c) the variance requested is the minimal necessary to afford relief; (d) the variance will not in turn be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town, or be adverse to neighboring properties; (e) in view of all of the above factors, the Page 3 - Appl. No. 3800 Matter of VICTOR AND ADELINDA CATALANO Decision Rendered December 16, 1988 interests of justice will be served by granting the relief, as requested and conditionally noted below. Accordingly] on motion by Mr. Sawicki, seconded by Mr. Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT a Variance to locate new accessory swimmingpool with fence enclosure partly in the front and side yard areas, in the Matter of Appeal No. 3800 for VICTOR AND LINDA CATALANO, provided that the pool, deck and patio areas remain unroofed, as applied. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Sawicki, and Dinizio. (Absent was: Member Serge Doyen, due to serious family illness. ) This resolution was duly adopted. AND FILED B T 101,114 c -vx i ATa /�/231�� I?CU Ii • /�R�l, Town Clt::c Town (A Southold lk GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, IRMAN- - TOWN OF SOMHOLD, NEW YOBS DATE .june...13, 1974 ACTION OF THE ZONWG BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 1914 Dated May 23, 1974 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN Or SO'UTHOLD TO Adeline Cardinale Appellant Cardinal Community Service Corp. f 1884 Deer Park Avenue Deer Park, New York - at it meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on June 13,; 1974 the appeal was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your { ) Request for variance due to lack of access to property ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance s (X) Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance 1. SPECIAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a special exception ( ) be granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article ................... Section .................... Subsection paragraph .................... of the Zoning Ordinance and the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) be confirmed because 8;05 P.M. (E.D.S.T. ) , upon application Of Adeline Cardinale, } c/o Cardinal. Community Service Corp. , 1884 Deer Park Avenue, Deer Park, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 A & Bulk Schedule for permission to divide property with two existing buildings with insufficient area. Location of property: SIS Peconic Bay Blvd. , "A" District, Laurel, New York, bounded north by Peconic Bay Blvd. ; east by now or formerly G. Harvey Moore; south by Peconic Bay; west by now or formerly Adams - Brown. Fee paid $15.00. 2. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship because SEE REVERSE (b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all propertles alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because SEE REVERSE (c) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) (would not) change the character of the district because SEE REVERSE and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( ) be denied and i After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to divide property with two existing buildings with insufficient area on the south side of Peconic Bay Blvd. , Laurel, New York. The findings of the Board are that applicant is surrounded by undersized lots with the exception of two on the west. The Board agrees with the reasoning of the applicant. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all ` properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district' and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. THEREFORE IT WAS RESOLVED, Adeline Cardinale, c/0 Cardinal Community Service Corp. , 1884 Deer Park Avenue, Deer Park, New York, be GRANTED permission to divide property with two existintj-,- buildings with insufficient area on the south side of Peconic Bay Blvd. , Laurel, New York, as applied for, subject to the following condition: That applicant receive site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Hulse, Doyen. i m oard, of App_ 18 r 0 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK DATE ...S/.......,.../.81 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 2794 by; , application Dated March 4, 1981 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To Mr. Victor E. Catalano Appellant 22 Canterbury Drive Hauppauge, NY 11787 at a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on Apr i 1 23, 19 81 the appeal was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your ( ) Request for variance due to lack of access to property ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance k%4 Request for a variance to the zoning Ordinance Art. III, Sec. 100--31 be granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article Section Subsection paragraph .................... of the Zoning Ordinance and the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) be confirmed because Public Hearing: 4/2/81: By application of Victor E. Catalano, 22 Canterbury Drive, Hauppauge, NY 11787 for a Variance td the Zoning Ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-31 for permis- sion to build a one-story garage with insufficient front and side yard setbacks at the south side of Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel, ; NY; bounded north by Catalano and Peconic Bay Blvd. , east by Keller, south by Bay, west by Pridgen; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-128-6- 13.2. (SEE REVERSE SIDE) 2. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship because (SEE REVERSE SIDE) (b) The hardship created (Is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because (SEE REVERSE SIDE) (e) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) (would not) change the character of the district because (SEE REVERSE SIDE) and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( } be denied and that the previous decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed. By this appeal, appellant seeks permission to build a one- story garage on premises located on a private right-of-way (also owned by appellant herein) off the south side of Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel, with an insufficient frontyard setback in line with the northeast corner of the subject dwelling and with an insufficient easterly sideyard setback of six feet at the southerly end of the proposed addition and 12 feet at the northerly end of the proposed addition. The subject dwelling has existed prior to adoption of the zoning ordinance and is situated on the lot at an unusual angle. Running along the westerly side of this premises is a 10 ' wide foot path. The Board agrees with reasoning of the applicant. The Board finds that the relief requested is not substantial in relation to the Code requirements; that the relief requested is within the spirit of the zoning ordinance; that the variance will 'not change the character of the neighborhood; that no adverse effects will be produced on available governmental facilities of any increased population; that the practical difficulty is unique; and that the interests of justice will be served by granting the relief herein as noted below. On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED, that Victor E_. Catalano be -granted a variance to the zoning ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 in Appeal No. 2794, as follows: ; (1) That the proposed addition be constructed with a minimum setback of 8 feet at the east side/south end, and (2) That the proposed addition be constructed with a minimum setback of 10 feet at the east side/north end, and (3) That this matter be referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission pursuant to The Suffolk County Charter. r Location of property: Right-of-way off the south side of Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel; bounded north by Catalano and Peconic Bay Boulevard; east by Keller; south by Bay; west by Pridgen. County Tax Map Item No. 1000-128-6-13.2. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs, Doyen, Douglass, Goehringer, Sawicki and Grigonis. APPROVED 010irman Board of RP�IB [RE ElVED AND FILED BY BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall SO!/T Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179�� yOIO Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes u, Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. �� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento Ol�40(11m Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov RECEIVE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS = I:;Rd (9 1 O 11-11 A Im TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NOV 2 0 20T Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 - FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15,2018 SOY9 hold Town Clerk. ZBA FILE#7206 NAME OF APPLICANT:David and Lisa Cifarelli PROPERTY LOCATION: 2650 Peconic Bay Blvd.Mattituck,NY 11952 SCTM No. 1000-128-6-13.4 C SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration-in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List ofActions,without s further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A,14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated July 25,2018 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant bounty-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: The relief, permit, or interpretation requested in this application is listed under the Minor Actions exempt list and is not subject to review under Chapter 268. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The subject property is a non-conforming 13,728 square foot parcel located in an R40 Zoning District. The parcel measures 75.42 feeffronting Peconic Bay Blvd along the northerly property line, 171.77 feet along a right of way on the easterly property line,79.68 feet along the southerly property line, and 158.00 feet along the westerly property line. The parcel is improved with an at grade trampoline, an as built frame shed, an as built pergola,a swing set, a basketball court,and a chain link fence BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances)from Sections 280- 17A and the Building Inspector's'August 9,2017 Amended May 17,2018 Notice of disapproval based on an application for a building permit to legalize"as built" structures; a pergola and wood frame shed,; at 1) "as-built pergola does`not constitute a permitted principle use on a residential parcel; 2) "as built" wood frame shed does not constitute a permitted principle use on a residential parcel located at 2650 Peconic Bay Blvd,Mettituck,NY 11952 SCTM# 1000-128-6-14. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to legalize "as-built" accessory structures on a parcel that does not have a principal use. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Although the application was brought by David and Lisa Cifarelli, David Cifarelli is the only-owner of the subject property and Lisa Cifarelli is the owner of the adjoining property directly to the immediate south of the subject property known as 2672 Peconic Bay Blvd (SCTM#_1000-128-6-13.2) (hereinafter referred to as"the adjoining property"). The applicants are married and reside together at the adjoining property. As set-forth in the application and at the public hearing the applicant has constructed structures and engaged in uses of the subject property that are,clearly accessory to the principal residential use on the separate adjoiningproperty and are unrelated to any principal use on the subject property. Page 2,November 15,2018 #7206,CifarelIi SCTM No. 1000-128-6-13.4 FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on November 1,2018 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: ' L, The Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Department in this matter clearly states the application was denied because as built structures were not permitted principal uses. Despite the clear wording in the Notice of Disapproval,the applicant submitted an application addressing the criteria for an area variance as opposed to a use variance. Similarly, although the applicant's attorney stated that she was aware and understood that accessory uses could not exist without a principal use, the applicant's attorney, without ever addressing the criteria for a use variance, argued various points, such as 1) that the uses in questions were actually permitted accessory uses to the allowed use of"open space", and 2) that the Board should look at the purpose of the code and override the specific provisions contained within the code. 2. In granting a use variance, a board must examine three criteria,the record must show that(1) the land in question cannot yield a reasonable return if used only for a purpose allowed in that zone; (2)that the plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances and not to the general conditions in the neighborhood which may reflect the unreasonableness of the zoning ordinance itself; and(3)that the use to be authorized by the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Here, the applicant failed to provide any evidence that the land in question cannot yield a reasonable return if used only for a purpose allowed in that zone or that the plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances and not to the general conditions in the neighborhood which may reflect the unreasonableness of the zoning ordinance itself. With regard to the third criteria for the granting of the use variance, as discussed below, the applicant failed to establish that the use to be authorized by the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. - 3. With regard to the argument made by the applicant's attorney that the structures that are the subject of the Notice of Disapproval should be allowed because they were actually accessory uses to an "open space" ; use,a reading of sections 280-17,280-13A and 280-13B that"open space"is not a listed allowed use in the R-40 zoning district. Even if"open space"were to be considered an allowed use, it is the opinion of the Board that the construction of structures would be the opposite of,not accessory to,"open space," 4. The applicant's attorney also stated that if the Board interpreted the proposed structures as an illegal accessory use without a principal use, it would be forcing the applicant to build a principal dwelling to maintain the accessory strictures. This, the applicant's attorney, would go against the purported purpose of the Town Code and therefore the applicant's attorney urged the Board to override the specific provisions of the Town Code that set forth the allowed uses in order to accomplish the purported purpose of the Code. First,as discussed below,the applicant has another option,to merge the subject property with the adjoining property to maintain the uses on the subject property. Second, the applicant's attorney in making that argument is essentially asking the Board to legislate as opposed to interpret. The legislative body of a Town,here the Town Board, drafts the Code.The Town Board identifies goals and purposes of a code and then adopts specific regulations to effectuate those goals and purposes. If a specific regulation fails to accomplish, or in fact works against a specific purpose or goal, it is role of the Town Board to make changes to the Code, it is not role of the Zoning Board of Appeals to override the Code. Rather,the role of the ZBA is to interpret the Code and to grant variances when an applicant demonstrates that the criteria exist for granting the variance. Moreover,the applicants' argument that granting the requested relief would somehow fulfill one of the purported purposes of the code by limiting development is undermined by the fact that the applicants have specifically refused to merge the lot with the adjoining parcel and stated at the hearing that they want to maintain their ability to improve the subject lot with a principal dwelling in the future. Page 3,November 15,2018 #7206,Cifarelli SCTM No. 1000-128-6-13.4 Notwithstanding the foregoing,even if the applicant is correct that the"as built"recreational structures require area variances as opposed to a use variance, for the following reasons, the applicant has not established entitlement to area variances: 1. Town Luw V67-b(3)(b)(1). , Grant of the variances will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The neighborhood consists of single family homes. There is no evidence that any property in the neighborhood is improved with accessory structures without first establishing a principle residential use. Sheds and pergolas are characteristic of the neighborhood when accessory to single family dwellings and in code conforming locations. 2. Town Law §267-V3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicants can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than area variances. The applicants could merge the lot with the neighboring lot. However, the merger would still require the applicant to apply for area variances for the as built" structures' non-conforming front yard locations. The applicant could also build a residential building on the property. 3. Town'Law'4267=b(3)( A).. The variances requested herein are mathematically substantial, representing 100%relief from the code. 4. Town Law_M7=b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. S. Town 1;aw-§267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicants purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. The applicants intentionally "checker-boarded" the subject property and the adjoining property in order to ensure that the lots maintain "single and separate" status while at the same time engaging in constructions and improvements to the subject property that are clearly accessory to their use of the adjoining property as a residential dwelling. 6. :Town Law &267-b(6). Grant of the requested relief is not the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a non-conforming use of the property and/or area variances, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. -RESOLUTION OF-.THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Weisman (Chairperson), seconded by Member Acampora,and duly carried,to DENY as applied for, Vote of the Board: Ayes:Members Weisman(Chairperson),Acampora,Planamento and Lehnert. Nays:Member Dantes. This Resolution was duly adopted(4-1). C -Leslie Karies Weisman Chairperson Approved for filing 11116 /2018 AGRICULTURAUDATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval, use variance, area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239m and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant:AMP Architecture 2. Address of Applicant: 1075 Franklinville Road, Laurel, N.Y. 11948 3. Name of Land Owner(if other than Applicant): David & Lisa Cifarelli 4. Address of Land Owner: 2674 Peconic Bay BLVD, Laurel, NY 11948 5. Description of Proposed Project: Renovation to existing 2 story sin le family residence 6. Location of Property: (road and Tax map number) 2672 Peconic Bay BLVD, Laurel, NY 11948; SCTM#1000-128-06-13.3 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? iN Yes No 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? { } Yes M No 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s) of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff, it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office (765-1937) or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS 1 Half Hollow Nursery Rlty Corp, 624 Deer Park Ave,Dix Hills NY 11746 SCTM: 1000-127-3-11 2. Half Hollow Nursery Rlty Corp, 624 Deer Park Ave, Dix Hills NY 11749 SCTM: 1000-127-3-12 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use the back of this page if there are additional property owners) ,�QsGe �e2� 7 19 21 Signature of/Applicant Date Note: 1. The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2. Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3. Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. 0 617.20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Completing Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Cifarelli Renovation Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 2674 Peconic Bay BLVD, Laurel, NY 11948 Brief Description of Proposed Action: Renovation to existing 2 story single family residence Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 516-214-0160 AMP Architecture E-Mail: bepperson@amparchitect.com Address: 1075 Franklinville Road City/PO: Laurel State: N.Y. Zip Code: 11948 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that X may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: X Southold Town Building Department & Trustees 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 4 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 02 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? .4 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban GYRural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial R(Residential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture dAquatic ❑Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 4 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? X b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? X 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? X 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: X 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? X c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? X 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: All proposed work will be consistent with the 2020 budding&energy codes X 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: X 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: Proposed new IA OWTS X to be installed during construction 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? X b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? X b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? X If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: Cg Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional Q Wetland ❑Urban Q Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? X 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? XNO❑YES X b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoffd torm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: 11NOXYES All impervious surfaces will be connected to gutter&drywell system Page 2 of 4 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: X 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: X 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: `/ I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: Anthony Portillo(AMP Architecture) Date: 7/19/21 Signature: 'R Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions;in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 Board of Zoning Anneals Application AUTHORIZATION (Where the Applicant is not the Owner) - S eliding at r t (Print property owner's name) (Mailing Address) (6 do hereby authorize AMP Architecture (Agent) to apply for variance(s) on my behalf from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. (Owner's Signature) S I (Print Owner's Name) APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics drohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: David & Lisa Cifarelli (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION:(Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance Trustee Permit X Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(cheek all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted thi ,20 Y. Signat Print ame AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics Prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees The Purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME : Anthony Portillo(AMP Architecture) (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION:(Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 19 day off JuIL�'�/� ,20 21 Signature �d Print Name Anthony Portillo Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000 -128 -06-13.3 The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board 0 Planning Dept. FbR Building Dept. 0 Board of Trustees 0 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital 0 construction,planning activity,agency regulation, land transaction) 0 (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant,loan, subsidy) (c) Permit,approval,license,certification: IX Nature and extent of action: Renovation to existing 2 story single family residence Location of action:2674 Peconic Bay BLVD, Laurel, NY 11948 Site acreage:-4 acres Present land use:Single Family Residential Present zoning classification:R40 NC 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant:AMP Architecture (Anthony Portillo) (b) Mailing address:1075 Franklinville Road, Laurel, N.Y. (c) Telephone number:Area Code ( ) 516-214-0160 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No® If yes,which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. N Yes F] No ❑ Not Applicable The proposed alterations and additions remain within the character and quality of life within Southold Town Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes 11 No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ® Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable The proposed alterations and additions remain within the scenic quality of the area in which the property sits Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ® Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable The proposed alterations will be designed according to the 2020 building code and all permanent structures will be connected to stormwater management systems Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ® YesEl No 0 Not Applicable There is a proposed new IA OWTS proposed as part of the overall project Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ® Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable All structures will be connected to Stormwater Management systems Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No R Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable There is a proposed new IA OWTS proposed as part of the overall project PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. nn IEYeEl No 19 Not Applicable This is a private residence with no right of ways on the Deed Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes 0 No 134 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. I^Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable The proposed work will not be hazardous to the natural ecosystem Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III— Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes El No ® Not Applicable Created on 512510511:20" R x � r PHOTO #1 PHOTO #2 3t 1. sr �•. per. ..... ,..,...�, Mta'� f PHOTO #3 PHOTO #4 PHOTO #5 Application: Cifarelli Residence; AMP Architecture—Applicant 2674 Peconic Bay BLVD, Laurel, NY 11948; All photos taken January 6, 2021 ( m �� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY F EUCYRD-U7ARD OWNER STREET �- - VILLAGE DIST SUB- LOT ACR. REMARKS D 50D TYPE OF BLD. PROP. CLASS LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE C tnr� /� �--••� --• + "' P/�ci R..��-. l��Pr�-�i'1� _ ( V o -74-c D �CJ V 1C3x jJ »' -Y 3 I L2Y �S �' ��- �`-`� ° til "'I`-=3_ i� L��- �� 9 FRONTAGE ON WATER TILLABLE FRONTAGE ON ROAD WOODLAND DEPTH a7 J MEADOWLAND BULKHEAD HOUSE/LOT TOTAL OWNER I STREET 2? b -- �•� � VILLAGE I DISTRICT SUB. LOT �Z;� •.^, � �_�� i { �- 1 rP P�G �J•,� G ��j l�;,,fit.�U �1--•-R ! i.%,- ?_..r'�---_ �/� I FORMEk OWNERAJ,&,da ;(aj, N _� E ACREAGE — Jn� �L! C` _-� '�k J',J C'5 /(/ S , _"` �C (?,r //, 5 f - W TYPE OF BUILDING ACt!a.1 4-9e (".(`(o�,' Gr ; j'�' 0'yq RES. !�� SEAS. VL. FARM COMM. I IND. CB. MISC. LAND imp. TOTAL DATE REMARKS ll � "✓�� r "l� -�e � � 0 (l l / / {•. 1 ;J r _W_ : ''-j �tr°-� =t;.- '�-'�P^ �6?, "; •":S`/{ f '7• ! �._� `� ,.�-�j�- �r�tt ��..1� •_-_.,-�..----• �w',r'-�� .� d G — 4� Gc r� '/ r�J G ��J ✓ S :r / f t�, �a: ja ! G G71) f ��/� ��b` D `�uh'S—l—�!'S C?i'�®�{t;)�'i7,�1.i 1..G11�L'S 1{�/G1�1 -�C')l-.!J• 111/.=MPS `' I I +�i� �if1Cl�'{��*y�x �;:�„t AGE BUILDING CONDITION p CL pf t1 f 7• ¢G �C4J r / �7 fI C�0 1��h,u-y s�fy r;,� �” �7 NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE Farm Acre Value Per Acre Value 1 t r^ I IL[�-rr, 1—G7UfG'� �'D� 11Jt1C / Tillable 1 Doc Tillable 2 _ _ 3 �c - ��'' , Cwt— •�i Tillable, 3 r � Woodland Swampland' '-louse Plot c� i it Total f t' ' ��• ` .ate-�; ..v '°-��'-.z, — ��` � � I � I I 7 I +H+ M. BldgFoundation Bath ior�� , , 10 nt 9 FloorsExtersaseme ! 2 Extensiai�' - � Ext. Walls /r�....�rr��.� Interior Finish s r^ { Extension ,_ Fire Place A.z�� Heat s " n' k u Porch Attic ' y ��;; 31 .. 71� �� Porch Rooms l st Floor 4 _ B.reezeway Patio Rooms 2nd Floor J ! !Garage Driveway i ( 0. B. j : - I j I GENERAL SYMBOL KEY: V==4 .p. Q W Q K JO J 0 a 613"' Yz 0 O � o Q � 7 Z>g la �Z� r: 2:�� LE V - § PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION t -l J U J Q ]T: I I su n I I I 1 1 I 1 ®e.111 It rF i r 1 1 I 1 IBJ • w. q I 1 v mu 1 I G I I I 1 1 A, z ,E, z � ALL= PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN h a z BGW.G•UD'.IV' 2 K O 2,475 5 F HABITABLE SPACE,2;165 5 F.68055 AREA dwz�„ I ----------- --�� ¢s�$y I I� exnmon n..v W 0003 ii 1L------------------------------------, PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION LLnur9 w I I I I xnLe Iro'•V II I Giw�� II I hi. -------� PROJECT: m i CIFARELLI = I RESIDENCE I I 00, 2672 PECONIC BAY BLVD. rm7 I Ell I I I m MATTITUCK,N.Y.ii952 DRAWING TITLE- :I-r-_-,T PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS PROPOSED ELEVATIONS u I:-H rnrnT PAGE• JID [cc m _ rim 55—••� DATE 07/15/21 L� 0 .h,� a + lam,gg PROPOSED SIVE ELEVATION PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN I > �,.•'- � '� � WG .ve•.I•-e• 1$75 S.F.HABITABLE SFA-E,1,760 SP GROSS AREA ` OF I 1�— - Revisions / 10-02-00 10-13-00 07-0301 SEE SEC NO.126 08-10-01 N 273.600 MATCH __ _--z ____—UNE 01.03-02 8 p FOR PCL.NO / P'•.? SEE SEC NO ab,125-04-024.23 zzi $ ! $ ' Q a .sJ N FOR PCL NO SEE SEC NO. O 4 7 125-04-024 25 1 3A(c), "« 7 g 8 d' �/• 1a,2 ! • O r/� I qrT@ lSpl 8 !OMz n i g 6 'o• z 'Q OQ- rw�7+« S ea a/ L) I rw Jg•« w 9 e l JT n`14 RI 275a 'y' 73 er b I ?o FOR PCL NO a b s!7& •Y•' '' ¢ 8I r SEE SEC.NO. I 12504-02423 g � e- , � o/ a a1i =I 20 ^'2 cm I g 1g EE INS 'A Nl 77 g 8 21 16 22.1 TS ao ee 79 O ,. to n 14 24 r 1.,A 222 / 1.1A 4c y'e• g ti. O e$m , oP 73 / ae $ 4 V� (PARRa 8 , nEcrlFAn� J 8 S/ 2 28 8 1.1A 4y + 8 »a y � 44 zl $ ozm 12a/ 4 :1 125 I /_FOR PCL 4 OI / 87 24 co 28 ! l 13 2 � 0 � 7a .�°a i a !La $ a 11 92 ,E 9 �yO� • � w 1.4A(c) g A 12 2M2 ° g 1 21 a j Is I 4. ,�,� �� r ads- b • a�� L PopenlaRWtir• SWd.moLd M. 'a Eera ��— oaretuie �-501-- rkCnra pNM lem --N-- IaQESS[AA5IM OIXfiMASEALLPROPERnEs E 0aa®Ta.�:n o.,�a —�— sa.w. (21) ..om,a..• --.-- w.w nA.a�. _—"-- araEwlwR r�EnaEowRcasmcrs G u caw O —raT—— 11 --T s.m.ae,�i.• ------_ a oam,a• mu 1.« --w-- Kaaa aaua l„. — owwr_ E _.�^-,� w.mr t1Gr1T d6 47 WATER— N Smml Saav M" Sobel Dmw+wn u Caunl lm -- L9N Oetrtl lna ——E—— matte Um——A—— RE—E_ D Parttlnn 23 OaV Arta 121 A(d)a 121A TO"^One --- Pan Q'J14 L.K --•-- u,wab+paClma--WN-- ANSVIANLE wAsrew+n •.....-.aeaea 121 A(C) _y-- SITE PLAN HATCH KEY. I - LOT COVERAGE ® PROPOSED BUILDIN6 ADDITION - - PROJECT/ZONING DATA i ® PROP05W ACCESSORY STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION(FOOTPRINT) AREA CO%LOT TAX MAP# 1000-128-Ob-133 Q t ZONING D15TRIGT R-40 NON-CONFORMING ® PROPOSED 2ND STORY TOTAL LOT AREA 16749.0 Sr. LOT AREA 0.4 ACRES Q EXISTING DWELLING IA50.0 5 F IIA% d SITE LAYOUT NOTES Coto-DWELLING aZ338,.J1LYI,1959 0 I. THIS 15 AN ARCHITECTS SITE PLAN E 15 PROPOSED DWELLING ADDITIONS 915.0 5 F. 55% SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION BY A LICENSED GofO-DWELLING ADDITION pZ1534,NOVEMBER 30,1962 SURVEYOR. THE INFORMATION TOTAL AREA OF ALL STRUCTURES 1 2,"1650 SF. IbS% a REPRESENTED O S SITE P S TO THE Coto-DWELLING 6ARA&E NZ1O663,SEPTEMBER 4,1981 ARCHITECTS BEST OF KNOWLEv6E --MAXIMUM LOT C.OVERA6E ALLOWED-20% ADDITION G 2 SURVEY INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED VARIANCE APPROVAL PENDING FROM A SURVEY DATED APRIL 23,2021 1 w AND PREPARED BY. REGtUiREV-5ET8AGK5-,MAIN BUILDING FEMA FLOOD ZONE X z YOUNG a YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE WETLAND5 DISTRICT PERMIT PENDING RIVERHEAD,NY,11901 REQUIRED EX15T PROPOSED COMPLIES Z:-: TELEPHONE. (631)'727 2303 DEC DISTRICT NON-.JURISDICTION <w 4 SIDE YARD 100, 6q, 82' NO SIDE YARD 100' 8.8' 29' NO HABITABLE SPACE EXISTING PROPOSED aa, N W IS'SIDE YARD y3�^23yy-��- N SIDE YARD 100, 22.7 102' YES FIRST FLOOR AREA 1,600 5 F 2,4-15 5 F. j SETBACK % REAR YARD- SECOND FLOOR AREA 1,140 5 F. 1,5-15 S.F. ¢ _ FROM BULKHEAD O' 643' 48.4' YES l I DO TOTAL BEDROOM COUNT 3 3 e �Xirw��p,RY�� 10'SIDE YARD ?q SETBACK pip I / BEACH FXlsrMODIFIED 2 / STORY SINS, / ��y jokob ; FAMILY '�/� 07 L' .0, Uy� RESIDENC yp,CK g _ N MI; IO'SIDE YARD - -� pROp / !I " - SETBACK = ry ` /O�, EXI5T WOOD 4'I° 'r jgd of i BULKHEAD 0 y3��2 U 8-1:9�j W —4y&& N6jo PROPERTY LINE LL am a ly �-76. BcZiao$ 4 � 3�"o�cwa PHOTO 71 EXIST WOOD 10 / �ff F tom-, BULKHEAD �A � ! / o'0 53 OEM F q YWD EXIST.MASONRY 'p PATIO TO BE -� y REMOVED z 8 foo 1 U�U PHOTO 02 N I<0 N12 PHOT(D#4 PROJECT. CIFARELLI ! / 66, RESIDENCE / eX/Sr 1 1 RECEIVED / 2.0'1 <I/7T U / 2672 PECONIC BAY BLVD. MATTITUCK,N.Y.11952 EXIST.SHEDS TO BE V1Sr y��K PROPOSED MODIFIED - - J ll L 1 ? REMOVED 2 STORY SINGLE U gROTO5/1p0,� DRAWING TITLE: / FAMILY RESIDENCE 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1 - PROJECT SITE DATA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS / _ p'l�p h PAGE SP-1 p:� f 05U� .,r�J E PHOTO C7'8gCk1�'o _ FOODAZH `�`` pp / DATE O>�!S/21� .-•c'..� Ftp '= ryea'j 10 N50"59'00°E PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROPOSE PARTIAL SITE PLAN SCALE, 1'-0" = 40'-0° i SCALE. I'-O" = 15'-O" R 3 a� off~ i tvmuim��sw�i w,a•m u ro®.r°�o:wi�aw�veT�n e�+wn�xo a io mw�s m ra mac msua�w.w mi""�r'.��,m m �iem10� �•®v M�inmoenm�uo�a XOTvamu�mu�is�m•,artx r�enog1ar�wmu�m.aQ��mm�a�l.0°�iw.mi�a io�is M ane iwoaiesri a��.vO1(a��rv�,yia�m°o�ar@v u o�im w�cream®�rnr e� 400 Ostrander Avenue,Rlverhead,New York 11901 tel.631.71272803 fax.631127.0144 \ a(*nln®youngonglno&ring4om Psp /" / N 4 c W�� ung,Land Surveyor \ 0 / 'Thomas Nb pert,i'roPesstongl Engineer Douglas E.Ada",FroPosslonal Englnaor Robert 0.Test,Architect ,yea W ^ Robort Stromsid,Architect I GO`�L N �� li SITE DATA RA AREA=16,749 SQ.FT. `LOT NUMBER REFER TO MINOR SUBDIVISION-"JOSEPH CARDINALE L 13.92' $ Q /. \S�Q, Pi• ADELINECARDINALL. `VERTICAL DATUM =NAVD(1968) \ 'p �15".% 70 �aj a ' \ g GNP \ i SURVEYOR'S CERT'IFICAT'ION I WEHEPERYCMTIFYTO DAVID DIFARELLI 6 LISA 131FAR ELLI THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH § \ \ THE CODE OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYS ADOPTED BY THE NEW YORK 9 STATE ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS. r �E \\ dor NEW j \ o o �� O W O P 'P Ilk "a 8 ` ca Pti E r- *. 'r = -, yye�,a U) >>< ' 1 P o uJ•" C), .'c �O �g3 HOWARD W.YOUNG,N.Y.S.LS.NO.45593 2iS�O 45 8 9 & RECEU/ER \\ ' � \ sy4,o 1041 SURVEY FOR '°� 3 ,Z DAVID CIFARELLI & JUL 2, 2 ?021 \ � 071FRAME SK° LISA CIFARELLI 9.42�611� at Laurel,Town of Southold OF APPEALS ti° 3 ZONING BOARD fits \� �°99 I ' � Suffolk County,New York $ A p\\ 1002 yla \\P` 9y? 121 CERTIFIED SURVEY 9 0 ' 3. ti`s' '9 �v°rO° to�e�� (j^� Co1mty Tax Map o1otr1=t 1000 SWi- 128 e1°a, 06 got 13.3 LEGEND `''s 41- \Lo. Z°zi`. �eq� / FIELD SURVEY COMPLETED APR 05,2021 s,2 s\ MAP PREPARED APR 23,2021 N 987\� `�� 02 I 932 t BBA =BELGIAN BLOCK APRON Q �4$ 9 Record of Revisions BBC =BELGIAN BLOCK CURB CE =CELLAR ENTRANCE ^ ,�\\ LAt 19.76 78 `9.27 REVISION DATE CH -CHIMNEY o e 2 �Cti CMF =CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND \r k CNS =CONCRETE MONUMENT SET p ° �a\\o K, EOP =EDGE OF PAVEMENT 'a 1 ,may\ �\�' .�°°o pA. TPF =IRON PIPE FOUND . �O OL =ON PROPERTY LINE °� \ �° WMR =WATER METERr`\ G AN WSF =WOOD STAKE FOUND WSS =WOOD STAKE SET 1 p�l� O� 40 0 20 40 So 120 =UTILITY POLE I` 5 • =END OF DIRECTIOWDISTANCE / h� �" a_ ' 8 Q Scale:1 40 JOB NO.2021-0061 DWG.2021_0061_Ga 1 OF 1