Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-53.-6-16 OFFICE LOCATION: ��OF S001k, MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex ,`O l0 P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 S O Telephone: 631 765-1938 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry, AICP Assistant Town Planning Director LWRP Coordinator Date September 8,2021 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for ZBA DOUGLAS BRADFORD#7544 SCTM#1000-53-6-16 DOUGLAS BRADFORD #7544 - Request for Variances from Article XXIII, Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's May 18, 2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct a new porch and second floor additions and alterations to a single family dwelling; at; 1) located less than the code required minimum side yard setback of 10 feet on two side yards; 2) located less than the code required minimum combined side yard setback of 25 feet; 3)more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%; located at: 3705 Bayshore Road(Adj.to Shelter Island Sound/Peconic Bay), Greenport,NY. SCTM No. 1000-53-6-16. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program(LWRP)Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department,as well as the records available to me,the proposed action is INCONSISTENT from LWRP review pursuant to Policy 4.1. Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards. The following management measures to minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards are recommended:specifically A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding and erosion hazards. Portion of the subject parcel where the new porch is proposed is located within the FEMA flood zone VE (velocity hazard). The flood zone poses a high flood risk. The VE flood zone is an area inundated by 1% annual chance flooding with velocity hazard(wave action). Structure in these locations should be minimized and not increase or exceed the bulk schedule requirements(percent cover). The side yard setbacks and second-floor additions are recommended as EXEMPT. Pursuant to Chapter 268,the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: William Duffy, Town Attorney BOARD MEMBERS ®F $®U� Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ®�� /y®� 53095 Main Road • P.O. Box 1179 ® Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora � Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. • �Q 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento ®�yC®UNN Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS E C IV E ID TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809 •Fax(631)765-9064 I JUL 202 Southold Town July 12, 2021 Planning Board Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold,NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. #7544 Bradford, Douglas Dear Mark: We have received an application to construct new front porch, second floor additions and alterations. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map, project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-5D is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman Chairperson By: Encl. Survey/Site plan: AMP Architecture, LLC, dated June 22, 2021 FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT ---- SOUTHOLD,N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: May 18, 2021 TO: AMP Architecture(Bradford) 1075 Franklinville Road Laurel,NY 11948 Please take notice that your application dated April 30,2021: For permit to: Construct new front porch, second floor additions and alterations at: Location of property: 3705 Bayshore Road Green op rtNY County Tax Map No. 1000—Section 53 Block 6 Lot 16 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this nonconforming7396 sq ft parcel in the Residential R-40, is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII Section 280-124 which states lots measuring less than 20,000 square feet in total size require a minimum side yard setback of 10 feet with a combined side yard setback of 25 feet. Section 280-124 further states lot coverage to be a maximum of 20 % The proposed construction shows a minimum side yard setback of 6.5 feet north and a side yard setback of 7.3 feet(south),with a combined side yard setback of 13.8 feet The site plan also shows the nimposed lot coverage to be 24.6 % t Authorized Signature Note to Applicant:Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file,Z.B.A. Fee:$ Filed By: Assignment No. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE House No. 3705_Street Bayshore Rd Hamlet Southold SCTM 1000 Section 53 Block 06 Lot(s) 16 Lot Size .17 acres Zone RT40 NC I(WE)APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED Owner(s): Douglas Bradford Mailing Address: 3705 Bayshore Rd Greenport,NY 11944 Telephone: 914-557-9097 Fax: Email: greenmen@verizon.net NOTE:In addition to the above,please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agent,architect, builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative:AMP Architecture for(X)Owner( )Other: Address: 1075 Franklinville Road,Laurel,N Y.11948 Telephone: 516-214-0160 Fag: Email: lmagee@amparchitect.com Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to,from the above names: ( )Applicant/Owner(s), (x)Authorized Representative, ( )Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 4/20/21 and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 4/30/21 FOR: (X) Building Permit ( ) Certificate of Occupancy ( )Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ( ) Change of Use ( )Permit for As-Built Construction ( )Other; Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article,Section,Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers.Do notuote the code.) Article: XXIlr Section: 280 Subsection: 124 Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: (K)A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( )A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ( ) Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ( )Reversal or Other A prior appeal(X)has, ()has not been made at an time with res ect to thisproperty,UNDER Appeal No(s).#622,#640#4971Ypar(s). 1963, 1964, 00 Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our officefor assistance) Name of Owner: Douglas Bradford ZBA File# REASONS FOR APPEAL (Please be specific, additional sheets maybe used with preparer's signature notarized): 1.An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted,because: THE PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR DORMERS AND PROPOSED PORCH ARE BOTH WITHIN THE DOMINANT CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. 2.The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance,because: THE EXISITING BUILDING DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED 75'REAR SET BACK, 15'SIDE SITE BACK AND 10'SITE SET BACK. 3.The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: THE EXISITNG IS ALREADY NONCONFORMING.OUR PROPSED BUILDING AREA IS ONLY INCREASING BY 545 SF. 4.The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT BE DIRECTLY IMPACTING THE ENVIRONMENT CONDITIONS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD,IT CONFORMS WITH WHAT IS ALREADY EXISITNG. " 5.Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? { }Yes,or�C}No Why: THE BACK AND BOTH SIDE YARD SETBACKS ARE EXISTING NONCONFORMING. Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land? W No {}Yes(please famish a copy) This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate,and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the commum Sign of Applicant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submt written Authonzatton from Owner) Sworn to before me this /0 day of 20 otary Public BARBARA H.TANDY Notary Public,State Of NOW York No. OITA6086001 Qualified In'SufPalk County Commission Expires 01/13120 d3 APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: AMP Architecture DATE PREPARED: 1.For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: N/A II.New Construction Areas(New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: 18.3x6.8 Dimensions of new second floor: 36.2x8.4 AND 11.9x1.8 AND 10.7x1,8 Dimensions of floor above second level: N/A Height(from finished ground to top of ridge): Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed?If yes,please provide height(above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: N/A III.Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary).Please describe building areas: 2 SOTRY WD FRAME DWELLING Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations. WITH 4 BEDROOMS Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: 2 STORY WD FRAME DWELLING WITH 4 BEDROOMS, PROPOSED SECOND STORY DORMERS AND PROPOSED COVERED PORCH. PROPOSED FIRST STORY ADDITION. IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage(from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on yourproperty: 2,063 SF Proposed increase of building coverage: 546 SF Square footage of your lot: 7,396 SF Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: 24.6% V.Purpose of New Construction: PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR DORMERS,PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR ADDITON(BUILDING OUT WHERE EXISITING PORCH IS),AND PROPOSED COVERED PORCH. VI.Please describe the land contours (flat,slope%,heavily wooded, marsh area,etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): THE LAND IS FLAT. Please submit 8 sets of photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction,and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes X No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? No X Yes please explain on attached sheet. C. 1.)Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? NO 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? N/A 3.) Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? YES 4.)If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? YES Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: FILING WITH TRUSTEES and if issued,please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? NO E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting? NO Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? NO If yes,please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking,please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? NO If yes,please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. I. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE and the proposed use SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH COVERED PORCH (ex: existing single family,proposed: same with garage, pool or other) ,c91,8 P&z&& 6/10/21 Authorized 9griature and Date FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUILDINC DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERICS OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. CER'T'IFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No. .Z.-2,11x............ Date .....................March..... ..3.............. 19.65.. THIS CERTIFIES that the building located at .8/8....Bodhpre—Ro,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Street '�e `.i,e ,t �w..k' c�`OciccNl30.ay het.......... Lot No. .b .......... erap )ort .. .Y ................. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated .................. ...............xCt -eA1 V..19---, 1953.... pursuant to which Building Permit No. ..2253,.Z dated Wog.9...1.9UkA96a..&.A'llYCtandP(19......... was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the low. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ........ ...Private..one-te dly.. ere:lling. ............................................................. . ........................... The certificate is issued to .... I3.omas-liggis............ .Omer....................................................... a (owner, lessee or tennt) of the aforesaid building. ........................ . .. � .......... Buildinglnspcfior ,........,..... FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: Z-29788 Date: 10/23/03 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ADDITION AND ALTERATION Location of Property: 3705 BAY SHORE RD GREENPORT (HOUSE NO. ) (STREET) (HAMLET) County Tax Map No. 473889 Section 53 Block 6 Lot 16 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated AUGUST 29, 2001 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 27601-Z dated SEPTEMBER 10, 2001 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is FRONT AND REAR COVERED PORCH ADDITIONS, SECOND STORY BALCONY AND ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING ONE FAMILY DWELLING AS APPLIED FOR PER ZBA#4971 DATED 7/12/01. The certificate is issued to DOUGLAS BRADFORD (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE N0_ 1100696 12/05/02 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED 07/31/02 PERFECTION PLUMBING Authorized Si I ature Rev. 1/81 LIPaGIO, THQMAS 0622 4±-2-7— , 46--Somerset Drive Dec. 5, 1963 _ _ Great Neck, new York Page 6 ROcessed to December 19, 1963 j12f19�63.-.---DENTED Lzermiss�.oa�_to_�a�,vert-�cces-s- - pry building into a one family dwelling on lot �_E/S--,Bay_-Shore Road, Greenport.,. New York. TOWN OF SOUTHOID, NEW YORK ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DATE December 19, 1963 Appeal No. 622 Dated November 19, 1963 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Charles Bumble, a/c Thomas Liggis To greenport, N.Y. 46 Somerset Drive Appellant Great Neck, New York Rt a mecting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on Thursday, December 19, 1963the appeal was considered and the .action indicated below was taken on your 1 Request for variance due to lack of access to property ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance (X) Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance 1 ) 1. SPEWAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a special exception ( ) be granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article ............. Section ._ __ Subsection paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance, and the decision of the, Building Inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) be confirmed because 8:30 P.M. (E.S.T. ), upon application of Charles Bumble, a/c Thomas Liggis, 46 Somerset Drive, Great Neck, New York, for a variance in accord- ance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 1, and Sections 303 and 307, and Article X, Section 1000A, for permission to convert an accessory building into a one family dwelling on a lot with a frontage of 50 feet, insufficient area and insufficient side yards, and leave a lot with a frontage of 50 feet and insufficient area. Location of property: east side Shore Road, Greenport, New York, Lot 66 on map of Peconic Bay Estates, bounded north by Frank F. Csajko, east by Peconic Bay south by James Rosati, and west y Bay Shore Road. 2. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would)(would not) produce practical difficulties or unnec- essary hardship because SEE REVERSE (o) T1he bardstiip created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties r alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and In the same use district because SEE REVERSE (c) The vaeance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) (would not) Mange the character of the district because SEE REVERSE and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( ) be denied and that the previous decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed. ti, da- of pppeas G BOARD OF APPEALS FORM z84 A� Judith T. Boken, Secretary By investigation and public hearing the Board determined the following facts pertinent to the decision: (All members of the Board visited the Liggis property). The Board finds that the applicant in this situation purchased two 50 ft. waterfront lots "approximately 140 ft. in depth, one in 1954 and the other in 1955 on Bay Shore Road. Tax bills on these lots have always been rendered separately and the applicant considered that he was the owner of two adjoining parcels. Rhe southerly parcel contained a residence and it was established that the applicant constructed, in the front yard area of the'northerly parcel a one -car garage, cesspool and water supply in 1955 or earlier, producing photostated lumber bills to confirm this date (prior to the establishment of the Southold Town Building Zone Ordinance.) Mr. Liggis stated that his original purpose in purchasing the adjoining lot to the north was to construct a second residence for sale or rent. It is apparent a start was made toward con- structing such a residence prior to the enactment of the Ordinance. Sometime in October Mr. Liggis advised his contractor Mr. Bumble to construct a boat house attached to the garage referred to in the preceeding paragraph. The Building inspector advised the contractor that a building permit was unnecessary to expand an accessory building for an accessory use such as storing a boat. Within a short time it became apparent that living quarters 24 kt. by 30 ft. were being attached to the original one car garage as evidenced by plumbing connections, inner partitions, large windows facing the water, ektensive grading, and other items usually associated with residential construction. A large southerly opening would permit storing a boat. Strenuous objections arose to the attempt to circumvent the Ordinance and the Building Inspector advised them of a violation. In appealing the applicant applied for permission to convert an accessory building into a dwelling. Findings of the Board of Appeals indicate there is evidence Mr. Liggis believed he was the owner of two separate parcels, however we believe this is not relevant to the current situation. The facts indicate that the applicant is the owner of a residence on the southerly portion of his property and is applying to legalize a second residence violating the front and side yard restrictions of the Ordinance on the northerly side of his property which approximates 100 ft. by 140 ft. , a single lot for zoning purposes. Although the immediate areas on the east side of Bay Shore Road is built up and consists predominately of 50 ft. to 60 ft. lots with single residences, this application requests permission for two dwellings on one lot. Such a use is denied to all others and cannot be considered an unusual or unique hardship. Construction of the dwelling constitutes self-imposed hardship. it should also be noted that an accessory building such as a garage located in the front yard area, whether constructed prior to or after the passage of the Zoning Ordinance con- stitutes a non-conforming use of property, and that the expansion of such a non-conforming use exceeding 50°% fair value of the original structure requires a special exception. In considering the above information the Board finds: 1. The use would prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent propetties. 2. That the character of the existing and probable development of the uses in the district would be adversely affected, and 3. That the conservation of property values would be adversely affected. Therefore it was RESOLVED that Charles Bumble, a/c Thomas Liggis be denied permission to convert an accessory building into a one family dwelling on a lot with a frontage of 50 feet, insufficient area, in- sufficient side yards, and leave a lot with a frontage of 50 feet and insufficient area. Property located on east side Bay Shore Road, Greenport, New York. L1G T0", THOMA$- _ 4640_and 67, Mai of PeGonYc Ba _Estates) , E�S_Bay__ _ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DATE March 19, 1964 Appeal No. 640 Dated March 9, 1964 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Thomas Liggio TO 46 Somerset Drive Appellant Great Neck, New York at a meethig of the Zoning Board of Appeals on Thursday, March 19, 1%4 the appeal was considered and the .action indicated below was taken on your Request for variance due to lack of access to property ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Oidinance (X) Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance 1. SPECIAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a special exception ( ) be granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article ....... Section _.._....,_.,, Subsection paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance, and the decision of the. Building Inspector ( ) be ,reversed ( ) be confirmed because 7:30 P.M. (E.S.T.), upon application of Thomas Liggio, 46 Somerset Drive, Great Neck, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 303 and Article X, Section 1000A, for permission to divide property into two lots with 50 ft. frontage and insufficient area. Location of property: east side Bay Shore Road, Greenport, New York, Lots 66 and 67 on map of Peconic Bay Estates, Bounded north by Frank F. Csajko, east by Peconic Bay, south by James Rosati (Lots 68 & 69), and west by Bay Shore Road. L. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would)(would not) liroduce practical difficulties or unnec- essary hardship because SEE REVERSE (b) The ihardsliip created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because SEE REVERSE (e) •ThE var'anee (does) (does not) observe the,spirit of the Ordinance and (would) (would not) change the character of the distnet beemise SEE REVERSE and therefore, it was further determined that the requested varimice ( ) die granted ( ) be dented and that the prcNious decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed. APPROVED FORM ZB4 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS n 0ozrppe!a r ���1 • Judith T. Boken, Secretary (Continued from front) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant owns a parcel of land with 100 ft. frontage. This property was purchased in two separate lots with 50 ft. frontage at different times. (Lots 66 and 67, tap of Peconic Bay Estates). There is a one family residence on the southerly Lot 67 and a garage with attached residence on the northerly Lot 66.' In Octob6r 1963 the applicant added a boat house to the existing garage on the norther''y].ot 66 and after completing it, decided to convert it into a one family dwelling. A variance was sought and denied by the Board of Appeals on the grounds that the applicant wished two dwellings on one lot, further the garage in the front yard area is considered non- conforming and the expansion of such a non-conforming use exceeding 50.0 fair value of the original structure requires a special exception. The applicant now seeks permission to divide this 100 ft. parcel into two lots with 50 ft. frontages and reduced area and maintain a one family residence o n•each. The Board is of the-opinion this-would be a satisfactory division of the property since the east side of Bay shore Road is built up and consists predominately of 50 ft. to - 60 ft. lots with single residences. However, the�Board only grants peimission for this division on the•condition that the residence attached to the boat house on the northerly lot 66 be detached and moved to a position no closer to the front property line than the existing one family dwelling on the southerly lot 67. Further, this dwelling must be centrally located on the lot so that side yard variations will not be required. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance will produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance does observe the spirit of the Ordinance and will not change .the character of the district. Therefore it was RESOLVED that Thomas Liggio, 46 Somerset Drive, Great Neck, New York, be granted permission to divide his property (Lots 66 & 67, Map of Peconic Bay Estates), located on the east side of Bay Shore Road, Greenport, New York, into two separate lots each having 50 ft. frontage and reduced area. It is a condition of the granting of this variance that the residence attached to the garage on the northerly line be detached and moved to a position no closer to the front property line than the existing one family dwelling on the southerly lot. Further, this dwelling must be centrally located on the lot so that side yard variations will not be required. a V APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS �SOFUI��Q Southold Town Hall Gerard P. Goehringer,Chairman ��� r/y 53095 Main Road James Dinizio,Jr. P.O.Box 1179 Lydia A.Tortora 4 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Lora S. Collins � • 'F ZBA Fax(631)765-9064 George Horning '�Ql ��� Telephone(631)765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF,JULY 19, 2001 Appl. No. 4971 --DOUGLAS BRADFORD 1000-53-6-16 STREET& LOCATION; 3705 Bayshore Road, Greenport DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: July 12, 2001 FINDINGS OF FACT PROPERTY FACTS: The subject property is a lot of 7396 sq. ft. in Greenport, with frontage of 50 feet on Bayshore Road and 50 feet on Peconic Bay, and depth of about 148 feet. It is improved with a one-story frame house and detached garage. BASIS OF APPEAL: Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval, dated May 1, 2001, denying a permit for additions to the house for the following reasons: (1) proposed side yards of 6.5 feet (North) and about 1 foot (South) are less than the minimum of 10 feet and combined minimum of 25 feet required by Code section 1100-24413; (2) proposed lot coverage is+/-26 percent, in violation of the 20 percent limit in Code section 100-24413; (3) proposed deck is 46 feet from the bulkhead, in violation of the 75-foot requirement of Code Section 100-239.48. AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant requests a variance authorizing construction of the additions as proposed. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION DESCRIBED BELOW: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspection, the Board makes the following findings: 1. At the hearing, applicant stated that the proposed additions do not encroach on the existing side yard setbacks, which are 6.5 feet on the North and 7.5 feet on the South. The drawing of the proposed additions submitted to the Building Department was erroneous in showing the southerly setback reduced to about 1 foot. Although the side yard setbacks will not change, the house will expand to two stories, creating a larger structure along the existing setbacks. 2. Information submitted by the applicant following the hearing shows proposed lot coverage of 24.2 percent, compared with 23.9 percent now. Applicant proposes to expand the coverage of the house, but to offset that by removing a wooden ramp and concrete pad. 3. The neighborhood is characterized by small lots with a fairly high degree of lot coverage, and it is common for houses to be located less than 75 feet from the bulkhead. Applicant intends to make the house bulkier, by adding a second floor, porch and deck, but the side yard setbacks will not change and the tot coverage will barely change. The house is sufficiently far back from the bulkhead that the threat to neighbors' views is minimal. The expanded house will not be inconsistent with the neighborhood, and grant of the relief set forth below will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties. Page 2-July 19, 2001 ZBA Appl. No.4971—D. Bradford Parcel 1000-53-6-16 at Greenport 4. There is no evidence that grant of the relief set forth below will have an adverse effect or impact on physical or environmental conditions, 5. The action set forth below it the minimum necessary to enable applicant to expand the house while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION/ACTION: On motion by Chairman Goehringer, seconded by Member Collins, it was RESOLVED, to DENY the variance applied for, and ALT5RNATIVELY to GRANT a variance authorizing additions to the house as described at the hearing and in written submissions, with the following provisions: 1. The northerly and southerly side yards are to be maintained at a minimum of 6.5 and 7.5 feet, respectively; 2. Lot c average is to be no greater than the figure proposed in applicant's submission dated July 16, 2001, 24.2 percent, reduced by an amount reflecting the 1-foot reduction in the depth of the porch, which the Board calculates at about 0.5 percent, resulting in a maximum coverage of 23.7 percent; 3. The new deck is to be set back no less than 47 feet from the bulkhead. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that violates the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Goehringer (Chairman), Dinizio, Tortora, and Collins. This Resolution was duly adopted (4-0). rard P. Goehringer Chairman . AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval, use variance,area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239m and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant:AMP Architecture 2. Address of Applicant:1075 Franklinville Road, Laurel, N.Y. 11948 3, Name of Land Owner(if other than Applicant): DOUGLAS BRADFORD 4. Address of Land Owner: 3705 BRADSHORE RD GREENPO T NY 5. Description of Proposed Project: PROPOSED SECOND STORY DORMERS,TWMLOOR ADDITION AND COVERED PORCH. 6.numberLocppBRADSHORERroad and Tax map TM; 53-06-16 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? { } Yes No 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? { } Yes {Y�No 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s) of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff, it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office(765-1937) or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS 1. N/A 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use the back of this page if there are additional property owners) ,�,�� 6 /10 /21 Signature ofiApplicant Date Note: 1. The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2. Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3. Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. 61 7.20 Appendix B Short EnvironmentalAssessment Form Instructions for Completing Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: DOUGLAS BRADFORD Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 3705 BAYSHORE RD,GREENPORT Brief Description of Proposed Action: -PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR DORMERS(358 SF) -PROPOSED 1 ST FLOOR ADDITION,BUILDING OUT WHERE PORCH EXISTS(125 SF) -PROPOSED PORCH(62.5 SF) Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 516-214-0160 AMP Architecture E-Mail: jmagee@amparchitect.com Address: 1075 Franklinville Road City/PO: Laurel State: N.Y. Zip Code: 11948 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that X may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: X 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 0.012 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.0014 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? •17 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban ❑Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ®Residential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Aquatic ❑Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 4 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? X b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? X 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? X 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: X 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES X b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? X c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes'available on or near site of the proposed action? X 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: X 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: X 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: N/A X 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? X b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? X 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? X b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? X If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: ❑Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland ❑Urban M Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? X 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES X 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑NO❑YES X b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ❑NO❑YES Page 2 of 4 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: X 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: X 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: X I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: ANTHONY PORTILO Date: 6/10/21 Signature: ,4mtf& e2ZGL�9 Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,of Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ' ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 Board of Zonin(T Appeals Application AUTHORIZATION (Wheic the Applicant is not the olyner) 1 Do oft ,•" S C-. 1��`�'��a�4esiding at �� �.� ��J-�flyt�- ill. (Print property owner's name) (Mailing Address) 1L�`9do hereby authorize AMP Architecture (Agent) to apply for variance(s) on my behalf from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. (Owner's Si(.1,1nature) rrJ(,—LPt :�:, � 'R, j �yr2 � (Print Owner's Name) APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and emplovecs The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: Douglas Bradford (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION:(Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the�actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 10 day of /TUNE_,2o 21 Signature Print Name L )4 ✓L�lrt�y� �—' = J � �v '�� r�� ~ AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: ANTHONY PORTILLO (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such a§a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tag grievance Building Permit Variance X Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO- X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 10 day of LJUNE ,20 21 Signature Print Name ANTHONY PORTILLO Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.noarthfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 53 _ 06 _ 16 The Application hag been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board 0 Planning Dept. Q Building Dept. N1 Board of Trustees 0 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital construction,planning activity,agency regulation,land transaction) (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant,loan,subsidy) (c) Permit,approval,license,certification: Nature and extent of action: PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR DORMERS AND PROPOSED PORCH. Location of action: 3705 BAYSHORE RD GREENPORT NY 11944 Site acreage: .17 ACRES Present land use: SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE Present zoning classification: R40 NC 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: AMP ARCHITECTURE (b) Mailing address: 1075 FRANKLINVILLE RD LAUREL NY 11948 (c) Telephone number:Area Code( ) 516-214-0160 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No 0 If yes,which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space,makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LVV" Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ©Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable THE PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR DORMERS AND COVERED PORCH WILL MAINTAIN THE COMMUNITY CHARACTER,PRESERVE OPEN SPACE AND MAKE EFFICIENT USE OF INFRASTURE AND GOOD USE OF THE COSTAL LOCATION AND MINIMIZES ADVERSE EFFECTS OF DEVELOPMENT. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LW" Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable THERE ARE NO HISTORICAL OR ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ON THIS PROPERTY. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ® Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable THE PROPOSED DORMERS AND COVERED PORCH DOES NOT AFFECT THE VISIUAL QUALITY OR THE PROTECTION OF SCENIC RESOURCES. Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ® Yes 1�1 No 1E Not Applicable ALL PROPOSED WORK WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOST UP TO DO CONSTRUCTION CODES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION PRACTICES. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria 0 YesEl No ®Not Applicable THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WILL NOT AFFECT THE WATER QUALITY. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes F No' Not Applicable THE PROPOSED SECOND STORY DORMERS AND COVER PORCH WILL NOT AFFECT THE COSTAL FISH AND WILDLIFE. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No® Not Applicable THE PROPOSED WORK WILL NOT AFFECT THE AIR QUALITY. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No © Not Applicable ALL WASTER WILL BE CONTROLLED ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS WILL BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. 0 YeLl No® Not Applicable THIS IS A PRIVATE PROPERTY THAT HAS NO POUBLIC ACCESS AND IT WILL NOT AFFECT ITS NEIGHBORS. Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ©Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable THE PROPPOSED WORK IS ON A PRIVATE SITE AND WILL NOT AFFECT NATURAL SHORELINE OR WATER AREAS. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living murine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No N Not Applicable PROPOSED WORK WILL NOT AFFECT MARINE RESOURCES Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural'lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No© Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of,energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Z Not Applicable Created on 512510511:20 AM i a� LL _ r r ur• ■ y4 � _ PHOTO #1 PHOTO #2 PHOTO #3 PHOTO #4 Application: Bradford Residence AMP Architecture—Applicant; All photos taken December 21, 2020 PHOTO #5 PHOTO #6 Application: Bradford Residence AMP Arch itecture—ApplicantAlI photos taken December, 21, 2020 SITE PLAN HATCH KEY, d 8 ® PROPOSED WILVIN6 ADDITION 1_-0) ® PRoPoSEm YS BRADFORD RESIDENCE W rN ® PROP05ED 2ND STORY W} Q' cr Z O to Z PROJECT 5COPE: PAGE KEY: 0 0 PEGONIG BAY - -- a 0 } vm RENOVATION OF FIRST FLOOR G-001.00 PROJECT LOCATION&SCOPE Z SITE PLAN&ZONING DATA O C MHWM AT THE TIE LINE - RENOVATION OF SECOND FLOOR W 511*06'40°E_ _ 50.00' - PROP05ED 2ND FLOOR DORMERS a PROPOSED COVERED PORCH 0-002,00 GENERALNOTES '>v O ENERGYTABLE Z STRUCTURAL DESIGN CHARTS 2 y v EXIST.CONCRETE BULKHEAD < PROJECT DATA: cq g A-101.00 PROPOSED DEMOLITION PLANS w ;PROJECT/20NINta;- �g 1 I TAX MAP. 1080-s7-o6-16 A-102.00 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN ZONIN6 DI5TRIGT R-40 NG W LOT AREA O.1 ACRES 1 I G fO-I FAMILY Dw LLINs Z-2Va,05/05/1965 A-103.00 PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN O COFO-PORCH,2ND FLOOR Z-29186,10/25/05 = J "Y I VARIANCE APPROVAL SPATE J FEMA FLOOD ZONE AE A-201.00 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS YETLAND5 DISTRICT Y PERMIT DEG DISTRICT Y 1-45796-02 n4/0000I A-202.00 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SUFFOLK COUNTY HD APPROVAL PERMIT• •OF BED. HABITABLE SPACE EXISTING PROPOSED 2 BASEMENT AREA O S.F. O S.P. A-✓O .00 BUILDING SECTIONS PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR AREA I011 S.F. 1,196 SF. 1 2ND FLOOR � I DORMER I 5150 t FLOOR AREA 1,052 S F. 410 5 F. 36.2' 5-101.00 PROPOSED STRUCTURAL PLANS LOT COVERAGE DEscR�PnoN tFocTPR.n-i AREA %`O ORAGE rj-102,00 PROPOSED STRUCTURAL PLANS G EX15T.2 5TRY WD. TOTAL LOT AREA 1.596.0 SF. FRAME DWELLING H? (4 5EDROOM5) T I ExIsrING BUILo1N6 1458.0 S.F. 19 4% PROPOSED 1ST t11 I 75'REAR SETBACK O EX15TINS PRAMS 6ARA6E 21 9 5F. 4.5% FLOOR ADDITION (BUILDING OUTPROPOSED COVERED PORCH 62.5 5F, 08% WHERE EX15T. I I .5' I PORCH 15) TOTAL AREA OF ALL ST'RUGNRES I521.5 5F tab% O 1' '•MA%I MJM LOT GOVERA6E ALLOWED-201% REOUIREG 5ET5AGKS-MAIN EUtLDIN6 PROP05ED PROPOSED 2ND I PORCH Y I PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR DORMER; FLOOR DORMER; REcuIREo EX157. PROP05ED GCMFL.EE ABOVE FIR5T I 1 ABOVE FIR5T FLOOR FLOOR FRONT YARD 95.0' 52.5' 52.5' Y �- - 100'TRUSTEES SETBACK - _1 SIVE YARD IOA' l.5' 1.5' N - (Ex15TING) N N BOTH SIDE YARDS DA' 196' 15.0' (EXISTING) PROJECT: I N N S9'FRONT SETB GK I N REAR YARD 19.0' 4TA' 41.0' (EXI5nN6) BRADFORD I I RESIDENCE EX15T. FRAME 6ARA6E 3705 BAYSHORE ROAD I I GREENPORT NY 11944 v o I I3 DRAWING TITLE: 81 (� PROJECT LOCATION&SCOPE LE,,-A . SITE PLAN&ZONING DATA I - `_ _ _ NIb°59'20"W 50.00' PAGE: G-001.00 5AYSHORE ROAD DATE:08/22/21 1 OF 10 1.TE LAYOUT NOTES. I. THIS,'AN ARCHITECT'S SIIE PLAN Z IS '•F" SUBGT TO VERIFICATION BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR. THE IN T �P REPRESENTED OTHIS 51 SITE P 11PLAN LAN IS TO E ARCHITECTS BEST OFF KNOYILED6E. 2.SURVEY INFOR -M KA5 OBTAINED FROM A SURVEY DATED MAY 16,1994 AND PREPARED SY. PECONIG SURVEYORS,PG, 1 N.Y.STATE LSU AND RVEYOR ,,,,,,,,,((( LIG.W49616 PO.BOX 909 r 1290 TRAVELER STREET 51TE PLAN (651)i 765-90 00911 LOCATION MAP %1�t0� O 7 SCALE,I'-0'•10'-0" SCALE.NTS s»vs�, CENERAL SYMBOL KEY: ,�. =a _ LL a _ Ex1571N6 To RErU>IN NEW FOUNDATION WALL � W 5 3 3 NEW WOOD MW-M 1 p�1� `` (r� i,. � ,��t� s� o OQOSU Za �Ww Q Li uu Li Li LiV qS�,lr_A. J J g U J O "y `� 't WR WH '`.J8 R� 1� CmFOS a tG aoz�a�t3 C 1- w �LLz3Q � woa4aQa'a mono �C W 12'-0" Z-O" I2'-O" a WW w I=O W f 1=-U�61Q S _4 0 I 5'-4" F- — — I ROOM I NEW LIVING O NEW WALK-IN a CL. I I DYJ.I � I I e � OO 4 O � � x r 5'Xb' ISLAND NEW O WALL OVEN NEW NEN KITCHEN DEDROOM =�2 W O 2'O z j ir m NlE78AR QLID I 4 w ¢ a :71 Ca W oM O FS-1Q to O CL O 4 a a N N C QN PROPOSED F I RST FLOOR PLAN w W SCALE. 1/4'- I'-O" o Qa Fla W �¢cai -o v > r g ( r vi o d .- q♦-�`a.�",l� OD 4� S W dry o�W 0 O Z m—N 0. O O e.+y Lit RO:Z�,�d w �Z> �56W. —PH [HIE 6zuiZ�aw t- 'Ort a�w 0 _�U w l-'- R W W it 4h wasTINB ewmv FLOOR O W~ IV ELEV. �.♦ALT a Fnl LLI no T,FIICgT FLOOR I jWMILM BEV..00 SOUTH ELEVATION (FRONT) SCALE 1/8°= Ib'• ¢W G U ¢U 6 `J LLI 0: 0LLI � O S x W Q 00. m W mz InW Lni O W M C3 N O 0 Tna o NORTH ELEVATION (REAR) 0 SCALE, 1/6° = P-O" � a o a � a v ,� O \ a -Wig NNw N. ZN E Io z�= $ ol3oarz�,� w�F��zaa3a vaio¢pQQa gaa � 1a1A��Co�CT., W 2U O U N U Q NSEW ELEVATION (RIGHT SIDE) SCALE. 1/6" P-O" od Q LJ O V LU w Qa {� W OW u. M X N O a O m a w/ c NSEW ELEVATION (LEFT SIDE) SCALE. I/8"= V--O" a o a ��"ti,,,t:i, .. - _ ,y,_ice, __ _ __ .. . -- .— _�__� ,:-_-__ �._-__--_ _- _ -•- _ _ ,.� _��`= �- _ _1--_ _ �__ _�- -__ _-;_". _ .5_ ,.-....-�.--_ _-- _ - ` ` - •__ __ ._ i .. -.' _ __ _c-- __ .. _: �,_.,._,.. _�- 'tom c - -: -. __, � _ r< . -_ _ , _ ,.C�.'4+-n.. � -�... _ __._ ._—.., _.- _-r .. .r -- _ F•r _ / ,� E� 1 tt =Q 3o-0 W 3 til et oS 4 76o0V, ...- co _ LA ' -/ ISLAND /, °W LANE SUP VE L D 739 - z4,Z fp AMENDED MAP A PECONIC BA Y'ESTA TES , f L O1_ `C VERA``GE lEX1S.TING I. F tilA. Y.1�,1®33 AS;MAP NO. »24 .A T��AR-$-HAOtilt7 C�C?ULc . } LST COVERAGE (AT TER TO WN OF SOC1'�'OLL7 = CIONS-TRUC TION)= 24.2% SLX� Lh° CINNY O CO� T . 1000,- 53. 00,.'46, _ cle 1 30'f '. _ FL DOD -ZaNE A�E--`lel.'+ 81 . OCT. 23;, - =FARM• E 3 20oQ' - ._ IV01/. 3,--200.0 ''t ,,ro additions P P•`.. � Ei� - 39b' SCj!, ft _ =MAY 23p' 20�Y! l�'E 1SI.0rvS 8, ADDITIONS)_ s JULY- �t� G} e�ti.• �I3 ^r� ,f°�` i td tie -line FINISHED FL 0OR EL EVA T1GN'� IO.T . CRA WL SPACE ELi�VA TION-, - 5:E L VN.C TOVS AND CONTQLN LW ARE.,REFERENCED �� � �t _ANY ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO SURVEY/8 A VIOLATION Of SECTION 7209 OF TIE AEW YORK STATE F.DUCA77ON LAS: EXXC&PT AS PER S C E 71�V T203 51�9D/VISKIAVVV 2, ALL CQ?1FlCATItS MERLON ARE'"VALD FOR TMS MAI'AAD'COFES' T7 OF OALY.'F � W MAP OR-COAES-�MAN TtEE`,Ip��nRESSED SEAL-OF THE SURVEYYOR � � IV. �S;: LhC -NQ. 196/6 L ;R(.�t/S�:Vf�AX7!K1G/Y.l_GdfR�7`r�J11fiVIli .:... ._._ c � _ -._ ..__. _-r.-._c__ _ - ,. ,tl�.� ,r O.<.- _ _.:!•. - - _ _ -' - -''" y_ `;� Alli0lTAWALLY TO-C41Fl.Y JITH$AV LANIM TM_'AL 7M BY'T ECON AWT$E U�A'BY AN�'.d11D ALC SU4VEYORS UTA�4 CWY 1631;x' `T� � "(6311 '?6�� 1797 Aid ,41�Iorto smE7Aw`SA�AP.. 1'EJ�AtS 91CHAS WSPECAW,, L p, $�7�C ' ;. TED- ,,°',• �t?OUGHT. TO-SATE'ARfE PT Ru''Ct3WUANq,*77W 77f LAW. /,?30 TRAVEL�fi'STi4EE•T Y �„ ,• X0.41 T'HOl.D, iil:Y. l l-97 f nr' 5�. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY �-wci6w,Kw�—qw�--kD JA STREET VILLAGE DISTRICT SUB. LOT' a= `~ t'�! / c d � p"a 4. _ �3�+ ✓ ��—i yiL— ,r 's s L �'" ����3., / � /tom��7 err FQRMER'OWNER E - ACREAGE +j '`' S W TYPE OF BUILDING P ` _ f RES'.. . (o SEAVL. FARM COMM: I IND. . I CB. ;x I MISC. I Est. Mkt. Value LANDfMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS v, ? � //13/7T S'oLb rr,mity-j 9 9 ,/ � 0,1 'f (2 0 ov � �7 .,� (r °"s,,i,.,°..�'` w& "N l � .L �� X79— t._a s -, s/`'i r( a- f '. (.�j { (� AGE` 7Q©, B,UI I,DING NDI'T�O '!7 2� ' - ✓ . lfid�;7a rJ ti. NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE, FRONTAGE ON WATER Farm Ac"re Value' Per Acre Value' FRONTAGE ON 'ROAD ' ,Tillable 1 BULKHEAD Tillable 2 DOCK ; ! Tillable 3, Woodland I Y j Swampland ( Brushland House Plot , Total i I I , ., i ''�� �`��"..�^� _�� -�. ..mss .d –�•.i� -'�—..I� � � <a�- � mJ,�-'- '__=�.'__ � I I I • I 1 I � P`�T—.•Y4 m..am..—<•d�,..,.w.,>.�,..-.•,..+,.,.w�..y..,,�,. � i - I - ---- F M. Bldg. Foundation f Bath f 1 Extension , g Basement XFloors F d 3 0 F _ �, — °`� -x Ext. Walls ?� �j` Iriterior Finish ° = Extension 7 `�; A. a Extension ` Fire Place HeatI f Porch Roof Type �r rl, Porch Rooms 1 st Floor Patio io Rooms 2nd Floor . '' Gara ems_ ,° `.� a, Driveway Dormer g � ..ter / w` ,e c F N, ` -gym � .. � � ■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■�,■■■■■■■■■■■■ • .s . .�"""'. IIaan� ■■■■■■■��.��.�■■■■`■■■■■■■■NEON PIP ■■NEN■■EN■■■N■E■■■■■■■N■■■NENE■■ 77:7) PARTIA WIN Ext. Walls, Interior Finish • • Woodstove Dormer DOE Dock • i ��ii7i, kid - _■ SEE SEC NO 045 MATCH - , LINE FOR PCL NOSEE SEC 4 O 045-05-004 FOR PARCEL NO 1-0�f SEE SEC NO. _ 04505-007 3 ILL I 6A(c) � � ��t •(J 7 h I s A(I,) q, TOwN OF SOUTHOLD )LK NN0[Rw.rea m4 ^�~/ • N � � 19 la 151 Q n C) 33A TOWN OF Q4iy n/Spy°„SOUTHOLD Q4 u J / 00 l 7n x 1 Z 18 i JTHOLD "s ^off ,m• .J�g .Q�. .'' ,9 v ,;,y ' fir% '1+ n •'r � n° \ '70' O '3��e $ m , \ ,°^` @° ,�. TS i o Al ,P PVG ' /y 210o^�' Tq'^'O' ^`a 25,E ,'§� a•'O 28 ,� 2p ~y ^',, ?:�,'e.3' 411 $ $ A ,� 4, " 443 3 w Qe35 00 46.10 ii 9`'• 5'••ul�i 7 44 N,�23g4o 4° 467 ,� 'is k.9\/a 469 45'11 Ili, /6t 5 46 8 N 337 182 LINE MATCH UNE SEE SEC.NO 057 SEE SEC NO 057 pQ sry9A..L iti%p+',� oN1Ew R 15!7J1 a , oa4 oae SECTION NO nJoncE �},vL;;.y COUNTY OF SUFFOLK C e TOM OF SOUTHOLD —TENANCE A!TERATION SA!EORzti z= Real Property Tax Service Agency Y 133 O,S-R13U PON OF ANY PORTION OF TYE E VILLAGE OE 053 0 County Center Riverhead,N Y 11901 M 052 053 SUF=OtK COUNTY TAX MAP IS?ROI,IBITEO SCALE IN FEET WT�0�T-1TTEN PERMISSION OF T- _I ADISTRICT NO 1000 REALPRO-R—AA SERVICEAGE4C� ^'T'y�3_xcT.`' P Osfi 057 PROPERTY MAP CONVERSION GATE mny 13 201,1