Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-111.-15-10
OFFICE LOCATION: fjf SU(/Ty0MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex h0 0- 0 P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Telephone: 631 765-1938 Southold, NY 11971 • �O CUUNT`1,� LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman,Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry, AICP Assistant Town Planning Director LWRP Coordinator Date May 21, 2021 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for ZBA File Ref NEIL P. STRONSKI#7513 SCTM# 1000-111-15-10. NEIL P. STRONSKI#7513 -Request for a Variance from Article.XXII, Section 280-116A(l)and the Building Inspector's April 12,2020 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to demolish and reconstruct a single family dwelling; at; 1) located less than the code required 100 feet from the top of the bluff; located at: 7025 Nassau Point Road, (Adj. to Little Peconic Bay) Cutchogue,NY. SCTM No. 1000-111-15-10. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268,Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program(LWRP)Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me,the proposal is recommended as CONSISTENT with the LWRP. This determination is based upon: 1. The proposed steps are replacing existing structure to be removed. 2. The proposed porch and additions to do not encroach seaward than the existing one story frame house and garage. Pursuant to Chapter 268,the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: William Duffy,Town Attorney BOARD MEMBERS 0 SO Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson O�� ly�l 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 Q Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes �, Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. • COQ 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento ��yCOUNTY Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALSLAPR n TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 21-nd April 19, 2021 Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold,NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. #7513 Stronski,Neil Dear Mark: We have received an application to demolish and reconstruct a"single family dwelling. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map, project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-5D is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman Chairp son .....'. By: Encl. Survey/Site plan: Nathan Taft Corwin III Land Surveyor, dated March 16, 2021 ,1 FORM NO. 3 �12) TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD,N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: April 12, 2021 TO: Michael Kimack (Stronski) PO Box 1047 Southold,NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated March 22, 2021: For permit to: demolish(per Town Code definition) and reconstruct a single-family dwelling at: Location of property: 7025 Nassau Point Road, Cutcho ug_e NY County Tax Map No. 1000—Section 111 Block 15 Lot 10 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this nonconforming 30,556 sq ft parcel in the Residential R-40, is not permitted pursuant to Article XXII Section 280-116A(1) which states-, "All buildings or structures located on lots upon which there exists a bluff landward of the shore or beach shall be set back not fewer than 100 feet from the top of such bluff" The survey shows the construction at 28 feet from top of bluff. Autho ' afore Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file,Z.B.A. Fee:$ Filed By: Assignment No. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE House No. 9d1S Street AUSTAIV j /l ' R'b. Hamlet CLiTC9QCIVE. SCTM 1000 SectionI/LBlock /5'Lot(s) /Q Lot Size Zonep,-40 I(WE)APPEAL HE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED j1&_&P:21 BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED .3. Owner(s): / J&L Mailing Address: g4 DqU6101&&4®4 ,d VA, iPDw,e V,{lr4 /Il y 107 Telephone: 717.4W--7141 Fax: Email: ,q/,0/4, STROA/SL1 tm 3IC4OAEA/. CCl�1 NOTE:In addition to the above,please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agent,architect, builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative:HIC�� AQ 1C1"ACk for§j Owner( )Other: Address: RQ R09 10-17 1Qan/OLID Al.Y. I/97 J Telephone.�„t'/6 6,68 6007 Fax: Email: Afj<1 ACA,jA Vae/ZOiV.Npl— Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to,from the above names: ( )Applicant/Owner(s), 00 Authorized Representative, ( )Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED ZI and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 20 FOR: Building Permit If ( )Certificate of Occupancy ( )Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ( )Change of Use ( ) Permit for As-Built Construction ( ) Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article,Section,Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers.Do not quote the code.) Article: X'X1l Section: 990 Subsection: 01164 Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: �()A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( )A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ( )Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ( )Reversal or Other A prior appeal( ) has, 0<has not been made at any time with respect to this property,UNDER Appeal No(s). Year(s). .(Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our officefor assistance) Name of Owner: ZBA File# REASONS FOR APPEAL (Please be specific, additional sheets may be used with preparer's signature notarized): 1.An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted,because: / . A Urlq 'e -09 AZ-00R; ,POoF�/J olY,�'�P�'OIPC/� i1/,o E>C/'.4N�E/� LXWo0499W FdY�R w/LG AWAIWAa T7iF4/ �ES''JW/r/Cs OF Pti'.�Reo�cJrsp pcu�tL/NG ruH/cy, A6Y AOS-I&Al 1 HVSS) X4iYDS CUED 4v/J'H M,5 X'(1,RR0e1N#01 1& �tl.ElGy, eC'iyoo,D 2.The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance,because: Xy0 ,��/S'l/rVG 04V,6U1N& IS`IN G 04,0 C`0AV17 OV, eu r /& N,r4p ow U,opwrIAI& f H6,Pk7r.4PxPxA1g1 d d/ ro Axa&-o®Ar4 Ll vl v> 4CCOf 90p.�Pl Qil/�', ��Etc I-M-/G ,OG(A&11WV eXVs'yE,o IN /ars RR,ffrZ-N7 e.ac4rl,om sl/I✓c,E l9 6 3, W/11C'N ,E/I<, ,Fa F'0l2 ./WE VdAR/Arl/� 3.The amount of re ie requested is not substantial because: are YAR/•#N�,� /s sZ.&J"rl,46 14,/Ar- , AIR BG vAF TV PR0F6-W,,0 C C V 9 R" POR C �. 7qo) AW 6S'Fr Aeory ,BLU,0'5 1359'0 rN4 /,'r, AARMz. J'FAWAPD A0-x opNs/o,v Doer Al o p- A6 C,RE4-r—*'-- 77V-4'� A1C -iNG Dw�GGl1VC� s,�p'Bit1 C1G o.�' �4�r @ 17T CC OMS'7' POliVT ")Y> avF� -�4�lL io7 SV'5oEC?Sp/ 4. ' ar�an wi/ ACaa G 'e soe� ect r�mpactnt kpAicYenvirnmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: 7P,,--J-aX0,?WN,,o/N& DL OUIN&S .91,7Lc f/1-11141e IN 4 0 CA/70A1 no 4alAc 4A401 /N JrO o� MS"A9, a n4e, �49 Pa 01>'Or�� P 10&I I/VG 6U0 UL19 N 07- flGi(//�/C,4N�y X,` 4 C P4NWOR 4AIA X3,6 /N A46��l'/NG 4VI mE NZ-16,1ljF6g110 QP ANp 5.Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? P< Yes,or { }No Why: Are there any Covenants or Restrictions conceiving this land? 4 No { } Yes(please furnish a copy) This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate,and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) • Sworn to before me this J�day of 20 . DAVID J.JAiN'NUZZl NOTARY PUBLIC,51ATE 01=NEW YORK Reglstmtion No 02JA6052585 Qualified in Sufiotl,County y Public Commission Expires FF�hwary 13, -Z&-3 d- APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: M1 Cl '&C-L 01. k JHA CL' DATE PREPARED: ?,&8,20Z 1 1.For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: RAA? �& �' 1Q-4Jr/QA/ DF 2 A(' QN1O,(AM 94"0,05LWE AR61MQA1 II.New Construction Areas(New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension:gd&W /R6 24.7;4X0-I.r'e*P6!�FX 1411 Dimensions of new second floor: ,ZQ.7-4 X I n g Dimensions of floor above second level: Height(from finished ground to top of ridge): Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed?If yes,please provide height(above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: Z/1.3/�T-- 111. rIII.Proposed Construction Description(Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary).Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: OA& Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage(from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: Ad Proposed increase of building coverage: ?�®•/� 7F2' Q Sf Square footage of your lot: 1-44,6 = SE 2 o/POJ Percentage of coverage of your lotby building area: V.Purpose of New Construction: 42 2tAW 0 VA M AffKZ nW,& A2&Z,6 && ,q/.1,1P ' zy?zz oy AW1170AV OF A' AQY" TZ�p /L, AW c��A9PF� W-& 7-D "Ap-;c 2%!&C: &61W5- OF 9Y'6 d vww VI. Please describe the land contours(flat,slope %,heavily wooded,marsh area,etc.)on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): To Please submit 8 sets of photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction,and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? _X_No Yes please explain on attached sheet. C. 1.) Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? A/O 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? AIIA 3.) Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? &17 4.) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdictions /A/G Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees:&NOA16 ,4 FZ,W g ji ig and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? N 0 E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers,bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting?_ &_Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises?�AJjQ If yes,please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking,please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? S If yes,please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. 1. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel OCEW"p>,Ql �,¢r/LY (y C 1a�, 7G,E and the proposed use jTj6n .*VT/A1 at&&1 ^14 2 C,4,e &ORA60 (ex: existing single family,proposed: same with garage,pool or other) a)o z/ Authorized signature and Date FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERKS OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No. ..A.16?91...I..... Date ......................... THIS CERTIFIES that the building located at ..Ag,At sgMRJ'gjnt.Aoad................ Street Nassau Point Club Pr N M W Lot No. ��1.......�ut�h©�uet...N�Y.,. ........ MapNo. .................... ......... conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated .................................AQx4......AA........, 19..03.. pursuant to which Building Permit No. .... ?�2 dated .........................APFA .......a3....:, 19.,6�, was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ........ ....... Private one a;y..gy§g; ;4ng......... ................................................................................ The certificate is issued to ...F`rangir�.,W, Roache Owi'aqr..,,. ..... ........................... (owner, lessee or tenant) of the aforesaid building. H.D.Approval Aug. 14, 1963 by R.Vill a, /4" ................................ ..................... Building TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, NY BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES WITH ONE SET OF APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) Permit#: 38893 _ Date: 5/19/2014 Permission is hereby granted to: Garcia Perez, Esther & Perez, Pascual 24 Tangelwyide Ave Brorxville, NY 10708 To: INTERIOR ALTERATIONS (REMOVAL OF BEARING WALL) TO AN EXISTING ONE FAMILY DWELLING AS APPLIED FOR. REPLACES EXPIRED BP 34002 At premises located at: 7025 Nassau Point Rd SCTM #473889 Sec/Block/Lot# 111.-15-10 Pursuant to application dated 1/1/1900 and approved by the Building Inspector, To expire on 11/18/2015. Fees: PERMIT RENEWAL $75.00 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY $50.00 6aa $125.00 AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval,use variance, area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239m and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant: ^/,51Z S',rZOA SeZ 2. Address of Applicant: .94 r-*WGLZW YLDE AVE &-OAXV ff-y/0708 3. Name of Land Owner(if other than Applicant): 4. Address of Land Owner: 5. Description of Proposed Project: 44.t2WA 72092s ,¢N AP-, ,tZMI ' If-6 6. Location of Property: (road and Tax map number) ® CU Mil 0 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? } Yes X No 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? { } Yes )4 No 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s) of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff, it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office (765-1937) or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use the back of this page if there are additional property owners) W,=c �.� c� :6 / z 8 /� Signature of Applicant Date Note: 1. The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2. Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3. Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. 617.20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Completing Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: 1 / 0 S Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 0 ffq 0 11l U Brief Description of Proposed Action: J' ~ ,®FSCR1?1!®N OCGdGU/N� Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 8' d 7 Address: . ®. b&e 10 47 City/PO: State: Zip Code: .TOUTyOL,9 N 7 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: 1'_V'01J W1X01C77*V A 3.a.Total acreage of the si a of the proposed action? 0.�Q/ acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.O acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? /acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban ❑Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial Residential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Aquatic ❑Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 4 Stronski Residence: Proposed Action Partial demolition of existing roof to accommodate proposed second floor addition. Remove designated interior walls, finishes, bathrooms, kitchen, windows, exterior doors, soffits, fascia's, siding, existing wood deck and stairs on the seaward side and existing wood steps and landing on the landward side. Construct 24.7' x 40.3' ( 995.41 SF ) second floor addition; 13.6' x 32.2" ( 437.92 SF ) roofed over porch: 8.8' x 24.7 ' (217.36 SF ) front foyer; 5' x 14' ( 70 SF ) front landing: 3'x 10 ' (30 SF ) seaward landing; 17.7 'x 24.7 ' ( 437.19 SF) on grade stone patio. Install new windows, doors, garage doors, soffits, fascia, siding, roofing. Furnish and install new finishes, bathrooms, kitchen, mech room, laundry room Remove existing septic system and install OWTS septic system to accommodate five (5) bedrooms. Install gutters and leaders with drywells in accordance with a Storm Water Management Plan 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? �/ b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? A� 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? X 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: X 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES X b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? v c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features,and technologies: 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: X 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: OWIT FXSZP.A1 X 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? �/ b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? /v� 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? �( b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? X If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: Shoreline ❑ Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland ❑Urban >rSuburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? x 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES X 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? XNO❑YES b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ❑ NO X YES 'Page 2 of 4 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: v 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: Date: OZ Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological', architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 Board of Zoning Appeals Application AUTHORIZATION (Where the Applicant is not the Owner) residing at 24 yA.NC-/�W Y-1 VE .411,E (Print property owner's name) (Mailing Address) 8i20Ayj1-L f,&I1 /0765 do hereby authorize (Agent) HICAMEL A kJHA CSC to apply for variance(s) on my behalf from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. (Owners ftg-�riature) A/,E'IL R 5TROrt1S�C1 (Print Owner's Name) APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics Prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees The Purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: .STRN6,KI A/ F. (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NOy If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) Q an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this �fday of �'�" ,20 Signature Print Name AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: f L,"M Ck MlCVA?Ai�Z Q (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town y€ficer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO - If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this Ze day of.�,20_grZ_ Signature &-a. 17 I Print Name ill L'm'a 4• /�j�C Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# //Z - f,S- 0 The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board 11 Planning Dept. 0 Building Dept. Board of Trustees 0 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital 0 construction,planning activity, agency regulation,land transaction) (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit,approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: Stronski Residence: Proposed Action Partial demolition of existing roof to accommodate proposed second floor addition. Remove designated interior walls, finishes, bathrooms, kitchen,windows, exterior doors, soffits, fascia's, siding, existing wood deck and stairs on the seaward side and existing wood steps and landing on the landward side. Construct 24.7' x 40.3' ( 995.41 SF ) second floor addition; 13.6' x 32.2' ( 437.92 SF ) roofed over porch: 8.8' x 24.7 (217.36 SF ) front foyer; 5' x 14' ( 70 SF ) front landing: 3'x 10 ' (30 SF ) seaward landing; 17.7 'x 24.7 ' ( 437.19 SF) on grade stone patio. Ins-tall new windows, doors, garage doors, soffits, fascia, siding, roofing. Furnish and install new finishes, bathrooms, kitchen, mech room, laundry room Remove existing septic system and install OWTS septic system to accommodate five (5) bedrooms. Install gutters and leaders with drywells in accordance with a Storm Water Management Plan z k Location of action:_ 7 25 /�j,� ,¢U Ql�I/� �P�i C 111— ' J&Oo Site acreage: Q, Present land use: 95-E A5AIf"A 4, Present zoning classification: A?-4 Q 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: M L d (b) Mailing address: 2 4 75�&&EW y�E ,Q Vf- , HPO AIX VIZ 14-0 IV,Y. `0700 (c) Telephone number: Area Code( )�� 4-9q— ZZ4 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No� If yes,which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable 11zlx1n! . c�2����,��.r/rias�s .4! rleR� c��-��".4/3�.E ,�y��►',4�" Aiy/> GUD(/�� CD.U,z7.vr� Di f 4j4S '!C/.4 L L/-EF ZM.4 04JML L a CA 770AI Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes 11 No J Not Applicable �QU 4Y ZZY A41,4 722 7P- /S' AQ D,T;E PT Ar ZZ&e.4�5 •V G PO S' UMIAWZ r Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes �jj ffNo �Not Applicable OVA & X9 j1L Z17,1 ,�ZW GG'N& E XCAcE ac ►lE��, p9a C��f/�tL�.a�. eEIZ � CA UZC/ .M-S/ n L*vtf.1CA&r LJ A40� — div VZC"e- Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes 0 No ® Not Applicable �1 ""aEQ &-V& NOT P,6C AZ5 Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes 0 No Not Applicabl C -7 6&4Z A0 YV-BP[, /A/ ZV E YO1A/N Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes [E No' Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No� Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy S. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No 50 Not Applicable r W//-L aE NO Mz, M-2 !Vd�cxs' lZM/zcC_P PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Ye�D No-9 Not Applicable MMAE7V 17 A4Q&_4 AR5�91 AAiA&?W Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No R�41 Not Applicable ft l oe >2� Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No tk'�J Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III— Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable �/ ,AL.!0-70 PT Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No � Not Applicable PiM/ CY a AMIA TO MY-7 PRO7,45Cl- Created on 5125105 11:20 AM SOUTHOLD BOARD OF APPEALS PRIOR FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATIONS REQUEST RELIEF FOR LESS THAN REQUIRED SETBACK FROM BLUFF PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XXII, SECTION 280-116 a. (1) DISTANCE FROM BLUFF 1. ZBA File: 7117 Approval to construct a second floor addition over an existing kitchen, having a setback of 67 feet. From its closest point to the bluff. , 2. ZBA File: 7434 Approval to construct additions and alterations to existing dwelling to a dwelling located 33 feet from the top of bluff. 3. ZBA File: 6929 Approval of as built deck of+/- 20 feet. 4. ZBA File: 7138 Approval of as built deck +/- 10 feet from bluff. N 0 % j ' d 1. Q 1.8A(c) • � ^ 1 � b °� G pPt m'I 18 4 ^ 18 1Y a 1En '' 8 a $b on +D +� a %-Q 00 17 Wn © � 1D 6 4 ao con J5 $ M 8 O 04 'g 1 Vic) 9 g a 10 $ § 1 \ � � 7A(c) � �' QA+3 \tP CA " S 7 CA 4 is 9P, D O ' \ +a 9Goq "ti7A(d 12 f; +D Pin TL oA 1� P"I \� $ X00 28 $ 1D +2 90 Z go Pa m27 1 d° § it +• qP •v +y $ 13A __ 28 g +9 is fm 1.1A( 1 2 \ VOS 251 ZI p D +1+ $ 1 Id i ' Z2 D � 1 rAf� \1 s 4 e,v� 4 20 6 NA13A(c 9 a 20A( $ D `°fes 47A(c) 1 \ � Jay moo', D t `� 16 A 'b 8 Y a �a a 7. ) 2A � I 0'A 63' �► W' 61 J' 1 131 I 7.2 I 04 1 11 12i 1 I ' �► �' �O 2.8N0 I � 'fit' V. AM 8 350toA § 13A(c) •� g la° s30 A l ,• 7•� ss aA' � �°) >o § 14A(c) 31 F00 1 -' tt ar 14 9 D+c Na § FOR FCL.NO POft v 24A9 \ ` �) § `A •\ § 2 SEE SEC.NO -c 11BO7-011 + '7 § 11)3 § $ .�6,�_ 1? .-.UNE MATCN _— $ xaoe $ fi Nb t 3AG) �T�EE SOUTHOLD SECTION NO NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © E ' Tova+or E mNMVReal property Tax Service Agency Y III ynuOE OF 'EtAO� xNt) cmim Tmm OF EWOIOx�Bn OF . P „7 Agency MT/W!I aISTRR17110N l�AMY POAf{aN OETNE � Cacxyt C�Ixaf gfyetDUE,NY11901 m 131 � uwToLxaOLWffTAA Eu1 mma1mm °�Ep�' .m A aWRM No 7000 PROPERTY MAP xacx ° P �� WTXOUfV�RIiTEN pERl649Nl OF THE 11D REJLLRi0EEA1 W9EW aEAMWr owj.✓ QUEI M.M- . .�•-. 'Y'"'_.` .._-. �- - __—_-- - ...-mesa-swaa•+.._�.�-'� BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson QF S®Uriy 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 ti0 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes y Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank Gerard P.Goehringer ® ,�\�Q 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento lq'c® ��,v Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 RECEIVE-D FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION E B - 6 2018 �� MEETING OF FEBRUARY 1,2018 e4�&4 0, �/��X,eY2 ZBA FILE: #7117 So old Town Clerk NAME OF APPLICANT: David Hermer and Sylvia Campo PROPERTY LOCATION: 3675 Nassau Point Road,Cutchogue,NY 11935 SCTM: 1000-111-9-4.2 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type H category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated September 29, 2017 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated December 21, 2017. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, as well as the records available, it is recommended that that the proposed action be EXEMPT from Coastal Consistency Review. SUFFOLK COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT: This application was referred for evaluation and recommendation to the Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District. According to a letter from the agency, dated December 7,2017,an inspection of the property was conducted on December 6,2017. The agency found that at the time of the site visit the bluff appeared to be in excellent and stable condition with vegetative cover and the yard leading to the bluff top is also well vegetated with established turf grass. No resource concerns involving runoff or erosion were apparent. The District recommends that all heavy machinery, equipment or supplies be stored and used a minimum of 25 feet setback from the bluff top edge. Moreover, it is also recommended that the homeowner consider adding gutters, downspouts, and drywells on the south side of the house,as well as adding drywells to the existing guttering system on the north side of the house. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The subject property is a conforming 1.10 acre rectangular parcel located in the R-40 Zoning District consisting of 40,342 square feet. The residentially developed parcel measures 100.10 feet on the Peconic Bay with a southerly lot line shared with a residential neighbor running west 407 feet to, 100.70 feet on Nassau Point Road and returning on the northerly lot line, also shared with a residence,of 400 feet. The lot is improved with a two-story home with attached waterside deck and basement garage, as shown on the site plan prepared by Paul Rice,Registered Architect dated August 24,2017. Page 2,February 1,20I8 #7117,Hermer-Campo SCTM No. 1000-111-9-4.2 BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for a Variance from Article XXII Section 280-116 and the Building Inspector's August 7, 2017 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing single-family dwelling, at: 1) located less than the code required 100 feet from the top of the bluff, located at: 3675 Nassau Point Road (Adj. to Little Peconic Bay), Cutchogue, NY. SCTM#1000-111-9-4.2. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a variance to add 130 square feet to the master bathroom on the second floor, over the existing kitchen, having a setback of 67 feet at its closest point where the Code requires a minimum setback of 100 feet from the top of the bluff or bank. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: No member of the public or any immediate neighbor of the applicant spoke in favor of or against this application. Paul Rice, RA represented the applicant during the public hearing at which time he as was asked to provide aerial photographs of the site and at least one comparable variance granted in the immediate vicinity. This information was received January 19, 2018. As part of the proposed construction, the applicant will add a roof terrace accessed from the master bedroom over the remaining flat roof of the existing house. Furthermore, the applicant offered to add leaders, gutters, downspouts and drywells to both the north and south side of the residence, as recommended by Suffolk Country Soil and Water Conservation District. The applicant also offered to relocate an exposed propane tank found during site inspection, below the driveway, sitting precariously on a precipice along the northern lot line. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on January 18,2018 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The Nassau Point Association neighborhood is a well- established, bay front residential community with houses of various ages, scale, size, most of which have multiple bathrooms, including master bathrooms. The 130 square feet addition, enlarging the master bathroom where a flat roof exists, is to be built over an existing first floor kitchen which is closer to the bluff top edge than the addition at its closest point; this addition will conform to the current setback of the residence originally constructed in 1985. The parcel is sited in a residential neighborhood and is set approximately 196 feet back from Nassau Point Road at one of the highest points in Cutchogue, with a neighbor to the north in a lower position and a neighbor to the south in an elevated position. The improvement will not be noticeable to immediate neighbors or discernable from the road. 2. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. As a result of the original siting and contemporary design of the residence, the footprint of the house is greater than the second story, resulting in a flat roof over the kitchen in the area of the master bedroom, a natural location for an addition. While a bathroom addition could be proposed in a conforming location, this would require a substantially larger addition to the foundation and increase in both the primary and secondary floor areas in order to achieve the same result. 3. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance granted herein is mathematically substantial,representing 33%relief from the code. However, no expansion to the existing footprint is proposed and the existing house and deck is Page 3,February 1,2018 #7117,Hermer-Campo SCTM No. 1000-111-9-4.2 closer to the bluff top edge than the proposed addition. Moreover, the existing deck and residence is closer to the top bluff edge than the proposed landward addition. 4. Town Law 267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code and must implement all the recommendations of the Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District,as conditioned herein. 5. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(51. The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6. Town Law §267-1b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of the addition to a second floor master bathroom and other additions and improvements including a roof terrace while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Weisman (Chairperson), seconded by Member Dantes,and duly carried,to GRANT the variance as applied for, and shown-on the site plan labeled A-01,A-02,A-03,A-04 prepared by Paul Rice, RA and dated August 24,2018. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall implement all the recommendations set forth by Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District in their letter dated December 7,2017, as cited above. 2. The existing propane tank must be moved to a conforming location and either buried or placed in a level location where it is secure and has no possibility of movement in accordance with the National Fire Preventions Agency regulations. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de min imis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Pursuant to Chapter 280-146(B) of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been Page 4,February 1,2018 #7117,Hermer-Campo SCTM No. 1000-111-9-4.2 procured,and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three (3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may,upon written request prior to the date of expiration, grant an extension not to exceed three(3) consecutive one (1)year terms. Vote of the Board: Ayes:Members Weisman(Chairperson),Planamento,and Dantes(Member Acampora and Member Goehringer were absent). This Resolution was duly adopted(3-0) -jau- Leslie Kaneg Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing D�/ a /2018 BOARD MEMBERS of S0 Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson O�� y� 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 'l �O Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes G Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. �► • �O 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento �lij�QUO Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov RECEIVED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS & VQOx S ( PM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD N 0 V 2 3 2020 Tel,(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 �y C.G. FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATI 1s®ut ®id Town Clerk MEETING OF NOVEMBER 19,2020 ZBA FILE: 7434 NAME OF APPLICANT: Jane G. Weiland PROPERTY LOCATION: 6485 Nassau Point Road(Adj.to Little Peconic Bay), Cutchogue,NY SCTM#1000-111-13-11 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type 11 category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 thru A 14-2 and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated September 18, 2020 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards, The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated October 13,2020. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted, as well as the records available, it is recommended that the proposed action is recommended as CONSISTENT with the LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP, The recommendation is based on the following: 1. The proposed additions are located further landward than the existing structure. 2. The proposed additions are not located within the FEMA Flood Zone. 3, The parcel is not located within the CERA. 4. Mitigative actions to further LWRP polices 4,Sand 6 are proposed. SUFFOLK COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT: This application was referred to Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District(SCS&WCD) for review and comment and the SCS&WCD issued its reply dated October 22, 2020 indicating an inventory, evaluation and site visit occurred on October 20, 2020, It was observed that the property is well-vegetated in turf grass and other ornamental plantings, No major issues from the stormwater runoff were detected, despite several of the dwelling gutters downspouts being discharged at the surface, in the garden beds. The elevation slope of the property appears to flow from the northeast corner, towards the foot path located adjacently south/southwest to the property. No irrigations heads seem to be present near the bluff and there does not appear to be any significant erosion of the top of the bluff. There is a fence along the shole backend of the property, on the top of the bluff. The top and face of the bluff is well-vegetated in mix of native and invasive grasses, forbs, vines, and shrubs/trees. There does not appear to be any severe signs of bluff erosion,presently. The expansion of the existing single-family dwelling may influence an i i Page 2,November 19,2020 #7434,Weiland SCTM No. 1000-111-13-11 increased volume of stormwater runoff; therefore,proper procedures are followed to capture this higher volume of water as indicated on page SPI of the Proposed Site Plan. The north-side of the dwelling was measured as 10 feet from the property line but, does not seem to show any existing issues. During construction it is important to follow New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control to minimize disturbance to the site and bluff. Avoid putting any irrigation lines or pipes to discharge gray water near/on the top of the bluff. Any intentional discharge of water over the bluff is not recommended and can speed up the erosion process for the bluff. There is a. wooden deck present at the tow of the bluff, in between the two bulkheads,which seems to be in stable condition. There is currently no existing issues in the area of the proposed 6 foot fence. The area is very well vegetated and there seem to be no signs of runoff towards the bluff. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION• The subject property is located on a conforming 52,413 square foot parcel (36,702 square foot buildable land) in the Residential R-40 Zoning District. The northerly property line measures 344.00 feet and the easterly property line measures 142.38 feet and is adjacent to Little Peconic Bay,the southerly property line measures 235.30 feet and is adjacent to East Club Drive which is an unimproved Right of Way that provides pedestrian access to Little Peconic Bay by way of a footpath. The westerly property line is 190.33 feet and is adjacent to Nassau Point Road. The property is improved with a one- and one-half story framed residence with a one story one car garage located in the northerly front side yard as shown on the survey map prepared by John T Metzger,LS dated May 1,2020. BASIS OF APPLICATION• Request for Variances from Article IV, Sections 280-18, Article XXH, Section 280- 105A and 280-116A(1): and the Building Inspector's August 10, 2020, Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling and construct a six (6) feet high fence; at 1) located less the code required minimum side yard setback of 15 feet; 2) located less than the.coded required minimum 100 feet from the top of the bluff; 3) fence is more than the code permitted maximum four(4)feet in height when located in the front yard; located at: 6485 Nassau Point Road, (Adj.to Little Peconic Bay)Cutchogue,NY. SCTM#1000-111-13-11. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to construct additions and alterations to existing single- family dwelling and to construct a six(6)foot high fence in the front yard. The location of the proposed dwelling addition is located at 36 feet from the top of the bluff where the Town Code does not allow improvement to be made at less than 100 feet from the top of the bluff, and the proposed side yard setback is 10.7 feet where the code requires a minimum of 15 feet side yard setback. Lastly, the proposed six feet high fence is not permitted in the front yard,where the code permits front yard fences not to exceed four feet in height. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The surrounding shoreline community was developed before the code changes in 2004 which first introduced the 100-foot bluff setback under the Town Wetlands Code (Chapter 275). In 2015 and 2017 the code extended the 100-foot bluff setback set forth in Town Zoning Code(Chapter 280)to bay bluffs; and zoning variances and/or wetland permits were required for nonconforming dwelling reconstruction and/or expansion subsequent to those code changes. The existing dwelling was built in 1957 and located 33 feet from the bluff. A preexisting property located four properties to the north is located approximately 23 feet from the bluff. The applicant's representative submitted several prior ZBA decisions for properties in the area which granted reduced setbacks to the top of the bluff as follows: Appeal No. 6929,May 19,2016, for a deck addition located 20 feet from the bluff;Appeal No. 7003,December 15,2016 dwelling situated 34 feet from the top of the bluff; Prior relief for six feet high fences in the front yard has been granted to property owners as demonstrated in Appeals #2649 and # 7171. The applicant's representative explained that need for this sort of relief has become more relevant since foot paths and rights of way were created by the founders of Nassau Point for the purpose of improving community access to the Bay.The applicant will install a new Innovative Advanced(I/A)Septic System more than 100 feet distance from the bluff and the old system will be removed Page 3,November 19,2020 #7434, Weiland SCTM No. 1000-111-13-11 The applicant's representative submitted an amended site plan, last revised October 14, 2020 depicting a minor change to the proposed UA sanitary systems as required by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on November 5,2020 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds'the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The neighborhood has granted similar relief to applicants in the past. This waterfront community has gone under a huge transformation with additions and alterations ongoing throughout the neighborhood. The request for additions and alterations to the preexisting one- and one-half story dwelling less than the 100 feet from the crest of the bluff and less than 15 feet from the northerly side lot line is consistent with the relief for other residences in the area that has been previously granted by this Board of Appeals. 2. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The proposed additions and alterations to the existing dwelling is consistent to the existing non-conforming setbacks. 3. Town Law 5267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial, representing a total of 68.3% relief from the code for top of bluff setback and 28.6% for side yard setback. However, the existing setback from the bluff is 36 feet where the code requires 100 feet and the side yard setback requires 15 feet when the existing setback is 9.5. The proposed expansion will remain in line with and not encroach further upon the existing bluff setback and side yard setback. The variance relief for the proposed 6-foot-high fence is substantial representing 100% relief from the code. However, the proposed privacy fence would be constructed along the subject property's functional side property line, which has been designated as a front yard, because it is adjacent to a private Right of Way. This "frontage" is in fact a narrow foot path that is grassy and leads to steps to the beach for homeowners in the neighborhood association. 4. Town Law 5267-b(3)(b)(4). No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. There should be no adverse impact on the only directly affected property to the north because the dwelling's existing partial upper story is already located 9.5 feet from the northerly lot line, so the northerly limit of the propose dormer addition would be set 1.2 feet farther from the lot line and will not increase the overall height of the dwelling. 5. Town Law 526740)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6. Town Law 5267-b. Grant of or the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a additions and alterations and a 6 foot high fence while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Acampora, seconded by Member Weisman (Chairperson), and duly carried,to Page 4,November 19,2020 #7434,Weiland SCTM No. 1000-111-1.3-11 GRANT the variances as applied for, and shown on the Site Plan(Sheet SP1)prepared by Jeffrey T. Butler,P.E., P.C., last revised October 14, 2020, and Architectural Plans (Exterior Elevations A-401 & A-402) prepared by Nida Chesonis Lee,Architect,dated July 10,2020. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall install an Innovative Advanced OWT Sanitary system as certified by the Suffolk County Dept of Health Services. 2. Prior to receiving a building permit,the owner(s)of the subject property cited herein must sign a statement acknowledging that he/she/they have read this determination; understand the limits of the variance relief granted herein; and are aware that if a demolition occurs during construction,or any construction undertaken exceeds the scope of the approvals granted herein,the Zoning Board of Appeals retains jurisdiction and has the right,after a public hearing,to modify,suspend or revoke such approvals or any term or condition thereof or to impose thereon one or more new conditions,pursuant to Article XXV, Section 280-141 of the Town Code. 3. This approval shall not be deemed effective until the required conditions have been met; and failure to comply therewith will render this approval null and void That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variances)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. In the event that this is an approval subject to conditions, the approval shall not be deemed effective until such time that the foregoing conditions are met;and failure to comply therewith will render this approval null and void. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Pursuant to Chapter 280-146(B) of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured, and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three (3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may,upon written request prior to the date of expiration, grant an extension not to exceed three(3) consecutive one (1)year terms. Vote of the Board; Ayes:Members Weisman(Chairperson),Acampora,Dantes,Lehnert,and Planamento(5-0). Qe—slie Ka es Weisman,Chairperson Approved for filing P/ -�6 /2020 SURVEY OF PROPERTY AT NASSAU POINT TORN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. �( Savo lu-ls-u SCALE 1'i NO =2 E20ntUtRYm 2020 MAY L tam(aElmorLs) LOT 44 SCM/1000-111-13-9 DWELUNG FUBUC WATER IDT 45 �E SCTUi 1000-111-13-10 Dyy PUBLIC WATER a. eHw1� 144• �A nr oB w�B� 11111 ``\S Iw u �.(1� uom a �i1e X11 i`ia1 i �&WT I'li 1ii11�1�1 6�. SCM/1000-111-13-m3 0,uyr aNR _ - ap �� •�. � $a -JB-- iiiii�iil DWELLING _ FA o 66 PUBLIC WATER C.u1• ,Sipy _ __ yu.1s W7c 11 i i IMii= F O r ` : ap rouB7-'J4-- NII �1-i e4 Br —' o ''�cmaA"���-%•+P �4e � `mt`. "� �,iil Li'l il�+{ _` Npp •6 ems'- —ail SSSS`` SOU7NOlD 70WN LOT COVERAGE BLIBDABLE LAND AREA-316.7122 q.IL(MEALL a�C-� _ r l �` i 7 •ar LANDWARD TOP OE BUlfr-J6.702 SQFT..) N \ i'---�t-I _ A NCUSE -LJ72 apft �i, y L _ -28-__' LOT 47 Apr 1 I j l 1yOQW PORCH 436 e¢R C ' RAISED PA770- B7 GA RA E -J79.,%fL IDT 133 Z= ZB 2276/36.702- e + - 24-----_-� TEST HOLE DATA SCRJIJ 11000-111-12-052 O ; ---- ; R MrDOUAID C£OSOENCE DWELLING 1 7/09/2020 PUBLIC WATER 21 11 ¢,/ `• EL 27.7' BR08N Law[4- asBROILV ELA)FY O 1 A181 9.• LOT 132 4•S PALE BROWN fNr 71m SAID SP / LOT 48 12• SCM/1000-111-15-07 NOTE'NO WADER ENCOUNMED WUNNEWFTq RD. - PUBWEUJNG 2 ELEUANONS REFERENCED 70 NALD BB KEY �I• g O -REM ® e WELL ® -STAKE O -TEST HOLE LOT 131 e -PIPE DWELLING 1000-111-15-08 DWELLING D -AIGJUMEM WELL LUr 48 sctuf- 'WE7WJD FLAG DWELLING 15-08.1 �O.a-U77UTY PALE PUBLIC WATER n�zs TOP OF WALL 1�ctY7eETrro, DOr OF WALL it 3 LOT 130 zL •i' r.T,•Err _ SCTU/1000-11-15-5 1 LOT HINDERS RFFEF 70 AUEMW MAP A GF NASSAU DWELL11. POINT-FILED IN THE SUEFVX COUNTY CLERKS CFnC£ PUBUC WATER ON AUGUST 16,1992 AS FILE Na 756. ANY ALTERATION OR AO01710V TO TILS SURWY ISA WOLATION aF SECTION 7209 CF TILE NEW MW STAR AREA-52,413 SO.FT. ti2�7 - EDUCARWJ LAIK E(CEPr AS PER SECTIONARE 1 R WN NO.496 B VA��I30UAnTSON P Aro Cla-93 R�aF Own IF SUP (PECONi (w7)F65-7797 YAP OR C MS BEAR 7NE 41PRESS D SEAL 01-THE P-0 BOC 9a9 Suftma 4 BNaSE 9aNA XWE APPEARS HEREON 12M nZ4Wa R S7REEr SOUROA Rr 7790 12-273 mevw.v®sir wnsvansmc mom. lo ><w. 344 DG i ares s 1/t' �uwLu ca{L:.•4i� llle Ii Fp ®F \ N78'3fi 20 E _ • LOCATION MAP & mom,.. rj•eo- __ m x _ uAan tw tiyln-'�� LOT 46— g vim•-a!` ®�'+ .r'%] l k�sr r "!,' 11�� I POSED NNOVATIVEAM'LTERNATIVE ON-SITE \\< re.ms -„7r� _P°w'wi' �'"s {�•} ]stt` wex`_^N; �!r•"""',+{ „^J-. WASTEWATLR TREATMEM'SCI'E PLAN •\ c _ _\ ,i. ^�`�-`�,. Alma w+ ` 9 rzl of �, I.I i 1�1 I ' oM.me.rx si P E `� _`'•I m� .� �'p�-�'”'\ rznmmx \mf10ru 1 3•�I i�II ,Il,^,'1 rk-.,q.q.J I� SITE DATA Pp �I�y "`'�\ ____ "_'u- � tD - N, €+�a� _ ,rI(• I I. � ..+]mr m�m.a•--I �nr�u, >y�cs earcnaa r�roxu�es 1 I V(:li .` .nvr \ •�`� 'C��.f,. pP�- .Y¢' •• �//mak' re < 11��. ,uxon_ I 'im..y�fc Prf, mn ro]em.uroreuc q ".%•' +�'---•_ � -'P'�J+/Tn -e��fFtc �'�-� ` 1 41 •�'I -! annex u.o. �lour Pe+s KJ Ct=ml:.S:° �\ mrtJl •�.� `Cl.i �'+,n�•y ' .wr.ew•AU] PNn/Jmut l°H..I �a t 'if U m ,... >m�,��r..,,a � arm - %.��•/ �,r,F,,4� y, ro a Pn'aR' �• I,!(t J� �-,.,: � � ��f��Wo u.�rr o G— W __ �• r.,.'.xo:u� `��gm..aeraevl 'v i�--.-l �hs{r '"hew, � f yam. ' l , ,!i. '",•„`�_579'83fi8'0 0'" I; -.--.�.:....�.__ v�uin°u¢a-•�laa W n CL .,.a'.°.�.�.. _ _ `/���I •` ` -t _~'-_-`_-- rwr ria wsres rnu�fr •mo ✓i6j °A'm�mv smela� - /t� e ,.."-i_^d"y;i 1�'} �- _ L`�'`1 �-y W�rCO lrz�Brlvv qTd Nl°sf ��] 13 m,a.,� .. •,.a i ��lar roeece n-1 Q�4� earsSvra�-eo¢I �r, \ .m ovussoo ^i (6'1 .�s.f�vamww' ]°e:r.m i Iar rovers wranm F a al c 1Y �2 O ` `Tr mu•Ararw,wv v.avease / / d-vjfAREA 0002M61r& LOT 47 W' V i Rovtyeta o �cmwAroAo .nrna.nn°.e a PROPOSED SITE PLAN v 1 � ,•` - -� �����/jjjjj�����''ppJJJJ'J'ppp!l!!!55555gq`''������qqq```'''���`````''''' � ]° n .tea.:'.'�'..2,.°"� I ".��4�r'°,��A 0.7 ^ /// `�'asm]uPea �'�-,..-p.t:-'�' - '�11't<\•�,�' a,...� � a� ``� \'! f / M.;,., r°...w..:a� �n\,t„'•^=.. :-._� n,' � �J Ii1�r4.\•,�.�`. s. - a°'..,..w,e•eu mscl�e � / S ....- ]o c p�-s4�� t, -- k'C�",'-}, 5 X1,.„1 r �'l`!•�r��11'. 9 MNT°Sl WUNN EWE ' �,;�a<, .f -- 4f. � r. ��,�ti ROAD ��vArer� � ------------ C � �\,Q•��• w.,.,�`' , �f�.r.m,4 - � �I�I jl'I��; FINAL MAP Dx � m . eoaa"s � llars...�•a -.-.-.- %.�:~i_' ---'�.�/'''�-; .,P% �I���` '--,' _.�. I�!, REVIEWED f3Y ZBA �¢ $°,� 3 —.-.— �. � ,:�,�^^ �'`�rj ..e,.ao®..s :�..� \ ��, L,I�-•_ SEE DECISIONA"�`L •�3<V� 7 T 46 ' _-� / ,>•- �_-- II ri t• 1l_1�/�y3Z Wtru3 qa� o LO Ncl a. •� y ` u / — ��•III'1 STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATION uj R �' :��5 l� _ o. � "�^*f ¢, lr „<z;�-; �.a t • oa«�.� r oma a emm�l.a a u� T s�q�naeas ' ° a.umm'y`b flew® } y , r — og'e /'/ ROPD•llb} '�' a v 100 . �� � � �-® "•11, \,� Lor 47 / PAGE :"° Sao.. Sao a"" m u.s °."" •1 PARTIAL SITE PLAN-DEMO spi„g oovm.aeaae STORMWATER LEACHING POOL TYP DTL a.���,.. ^• a�+•�a°n °„nom j ��• - x x /// rxr�w xxs � r•lo o• of 4 BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ��0�$O!/ryo 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 Eric Dantes Southold,NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning aOQ 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider ���'C0 Southold,NY 11971 RE E VED http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS �hA 2Zf" TOWN OF SOUTHOLD l.L Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 outhold Town Clerk FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF MAY 19,2016 ZBA FILE: 6929 NAME OF APPLICANT:Neil Strornski and Patricia Perez PROPERTY LOCATION: 7125 Nassau Point Road,Cutchogue,NY SCTM# 1000-111-15-11 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type H category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated February 9, 2016 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards.The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated February 11,2016.Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP in regard to the survey/site plan not showing the Flood zones and the as-built additions and accessory structures being built without the benefit of a Board review. The survey/site plan has been revised and submitted to show the Flood Zones (Zone X and Zone VE) and the subject as-built structures between the top-of-bluff and bulk head will be reviewed by the Southold Town Trustees, all of which will then be CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The subject parcel is a 33,673 square foot waterfront parcel in an R-40 district. The parcel fronts Nassau Point Road for 101.18 feet, it adjoins a parcel to the north for 329.81 feet and a parcel to the south for 343.66 feet and is waterfront to Little Peconic Bay along the apparent high water mark for 100.01 feet. The parcel is improved with a one and two story frame and stone house and garage with an attached as-built deck. The parcel has a bulkhead at the bottom of the slope and has multiple retaining walls, decks and stairs between the top7of--bluff and bottom of slope, all as shown on the survey prepared by Nathan Corwin Taft III, L.S.,dated November. 19,2007 and last revised March 4,2016(Add Flood Zone). BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XXII Section 280-116A and Article XXIII Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's December 22, 2015, Amended January 14, 2016 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit to legalize `as built' additions/alterations and accessory structures and construct additions/alterations to the existing `as built' accessory structures, at; 1)the proposed and Page 2-May 19,2016 ZBA File#6929—Stronski SCTM Al 1000-I11-15-11 `as built' accessory construction is less than code required setback of 100 feet from the top of the bluff,2) `as built' deck addition is less than the code required setback of 100 feet from the top of the bluff,3) `as built' deck addition located at less than the code required minimum side yard setback of 15 feet, located at: 7125 Nassau Point Road (adj.to Little Peconic Bay)Cutchogue,NY. SCTM#1000-111-15-11 RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to maintain an as-built wood deck addition having: 1.) a top of bluff setback of+/- 20 feet, where the code requires a minimum of 100 feet and 2.) a single side yard setback of 12.8 feet,where the code requires a minimum of 15 feet, all as shown on the survey prepared by Nathan Corwin Taft III,L.S., dated November 19,2007 and last revised March 4,2016(Add Flood Zone). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: This application only addresses the as-built deck addition that is attached to the rear of the dwelling and landward of the top-of-bluff,ZBA jurisdiction. The area between the existing top-of-bluff and existing bulkhead at the bottom of the slope (bluff face) has multiple retaining walls, decking, landings and stairs of which some are being removed and/or repaired or rebuilt. This area is under the jurisdiction of the Town Trustees, The Board of Appeals requested and received comments on the subject application from the Board of Town Trustees in a Memorandum dated March 9, 2016, which included the proposed removal of an existing dilapidated "boathouse/gazebo" which the applicant intends to do. The Board also required that the applicant contact Jay Tanski, Senior Coastal Processes and Facilities Specialist, at Sea Grant to determine the impact of removal of retaining walls and other structures on bluff stability. A letter from Tanski, dated April 22, 2016, was received at the public hearing on May 5,2016. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on March 3,2016 and May 5,2016,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. Rear yard attached decks are characteristic of residential properties in this neighborhood and the subject as-built deck cannot be seen from the street. 2. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance.The applicant could have constructed a patio at grade in lieu of the raised as-built deck. 3. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance granted herein for a top-of-bluff setback is mathematically substantial, representing 80% relief from the code. However, is has been professionally determined by a Senior Coastal Processes and Facilities Specialist that "The bluff face was steep but well-vegetated, indicating it was relatively stable". Therefore, since the deck is as-built from at least 2001 (from viewing Suffolk County GIS data), it shows that its existence, over time, has not been detrimental to the stability of this bluff, which mitigates the substantiality. The variance granted herein for a side yard setback is mathematically substantial, representing 13%relief from the code. However, the applicant's representative stated that there is an error in the submitted survey showing the subject existing side yard setback. Upon site inspection, it was discovered that the as-built deck addition is aligned with the dwelling in the side yard. The as-built deck addition is in alignment with the dwelling and has the same existing side yard setback as that of the dwelling, of 14 feet, which represents a 7% relief from the code,which is not substantial. Page 3-May 19,2016 ZBA File#6929—Stronski SCTM 4 1000-111-15-11 4. Town.Law §267-0)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance iri this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the.neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management'Code. 5. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in.effect and it-is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations'on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code i-effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6.,Town Law 6267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary-and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of an attached rear yard deck, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community._ RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B;motion was offered by Member Schneider, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried,to GRANT the variances as applied for, subject to the receipt of a revised survey showing the correct 'side yard setback for the'as built"attached deck addition, and subject to the following CONDITIONS: 1. Approval of the as built deck by the Board of Town Trustees 2. Submission of a revised survey showing the correct side yard setback for the as built deck Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural,drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variances)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code: This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbdcks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Pursuant to Chapter 280-146(B) of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured, and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three (3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may,upon written- request prior to the date of ekpiration, grant an extension not to exceed three(3) consecutive one (1)year terms. Vote of the Board.- Ayes: Members Weisman (Chairperson), Schneider, Dantes, Horning, Goehringer. This Resolution was duly adopted(5-0). Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing-5-/,36) /2016 OFFICE LOCATION: MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex ��0�so�ryo P.O.Box 1179 54375 State Road Route 25 hO Southold,NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold,NY y Telephone:631765-1809 ® aOQ http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Town of Southold ECEIVED FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION N 1 1 2018 MEETING OF JUNE 7,2018 ZBA FILE#7138 S thold Town Clerk NAME OF APPLICANT: Stephanie L. Teicher PROPERTY LOCATION: 6825 Nassau Point Road,Cutchogue,NY 11935 SCTM# 1000-111-15-8.2 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type H category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated December 1, 2017 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated March 26, 2018. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided that the Board considers recommendations that the applicant establish a vegetated buffer landward of the top of bluff which incorporates the existing vegetation; and verify that no stormwater runoff will be directed towards the bluff from structures. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TOWN ENGINEER: The Town Engineer, in a letter dated February 27 2018, recommended that 1) the "as-built" construction and renovation of this existing residence should comply with Town Code Chapter 236 and contain storm water runoff generated by the residence. 2)The bluff face immediately adjacent to the deck construction has relatively steep slopes. To protect this fragile slope the Town Engineer also recommends a minimum width of non-turf buffer be required to remain along the top of the bluff. In addition,the applicant will be required to submit two copies of a storm water management and control plan for review and approval prior to the installation of any new drainage. SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: Pursuant to this Board's request, the application and site plan, dated March 2,2018, was forwarded the Board of Trustees for their comments with a request to inspect the site. In the memo from the Board of Trustees dated April 17, 2018,they recommended that the existing deck and steps be scaled back to no greater than 24' 11"seaward from the existing dwelling and that a proposed 9 ft.by 9 ft. platform with zero bluff setback be removed. The most recent revised site plan dated April 30, 2018 shows the deck at 24' 11" seaward of the dwelling and a 6 ft. x 6 ft. wood platform at zero bluff setback. The non-conforming rear yard setback remains the same at 13' 4". Page 2,June 7,2018 #7138,Teicher SCTM No. 1000-111-15-8.2 SUFFOLK COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT: This application was referred for an evaluation and recommendation to the Suffolk County SWCD. According to the information provided in a letter from the agency dated December 7, 2017, following an inspection conducted on December 6, 2017, the agency found that the bluff was in excellent and stable condition with vegetative cover, and the yard leading to the bluff top also in a well vegetated condition. No resource concerns involving runoff or erosion were apparent. Since the removal of the existing stairs and construction of new stairs will pose an erosion risk to the bluff face, care must be taken to minimize any disturbances to the bluff face to the greatest extent possible. Furthermore, it is critical that erosion control measures be implemented as quickly as possible after construction. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The property is a non-conforming 30,266 square foot parcel located in an R-40 zone. The parcel runs 99.68 feet of wood bulkhead along Little Peconic Bay. The property runs 100.94 feet along Nassau point Road, 185.60 feet on the North side,and 315.20 feet on the South side. The parcel is improved with a two story frame house, deck, 2nd floor deck, brick patio,wood stairs down bluff,stone steps and landing,and wood bulkhead. All is shown on a survey by John T.Metzger,LLS, last revised July 25,2016. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XXII, Section 280-116 A(1); Article XXIU, Section 280-124; and the Building Inspector's November 15, 2017, amended November 20, 2017 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a building permit to legalize "as-built" additions to an existing single family dwelling; at; 1) located less than the code required 100 feet from the top of the bluff, 2) less than the code required minimum rear yard setback of 50 feet; located at: 6825 Nassau Point Road, (Adj. to Little Peconic Bay) Cutchogue,NY. SCTM#1000-111.-15-8.2. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to legalize "as-built" and proposed additions and alterations: 1. a proposed 9 ft. x 9 ft. wood platform with bench at a zero setback from the top of the bluff where the code requires 100 feet and 2. A rear yard setback of 13' 4"from the rear property line/tie line to a proposed 99 sq. ft, wood landing between the existing landward retaining wall and bulkhead as built bulkhead structure, where the code requires a minimum of 50 feet ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: During the hearing, the applicant was asked to bring the plan into more conformity with the code. On May 1, 2018, the applicant submitted a site plan dated April 4, 2018 eliminating approximately 65 sq. ft. of proposed deck expansion and showing an attached deck at 24' 11" landward of the existing dwelling, per Trustee's recommendation, and reducing the size of the proposed wood landing. The non- conforming setbacks to the top of the bluff and distance of structures to the rear yard property line remain the same. Much of the existing attached decking and walkway improvements were done without the benefit of a building permit. The intent, by the applicant, is to legalize structures that were illegally built with non-conforming dimensional setbacks and to request variance relief to increase the non-conformities. Also at the hearing,the applicant's agent testified that several of the structures on the property had valid certificates of occupancy. However, the only certificate of occupancy on file, certificate of occupancy # Z11314 dated November 29, 1982 is for a private one family dwelling. Review of the Building Department's file shows that a site plan by Arthur G. Eppig, labeled A-1 and dated July 18, 1982 shows a deck +/- 17 feet from the top of the bluff. The site plan also shows a stair case going down the bluff to the beach. The submitted revised site plan shows the proposed re-constructed deck at a varying setback of approximately 15 to 17 feet from the top if the bluff FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on March 1,2018,April 5,2018 and May 3, 2018 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the relief for the rear yard setback between the tie line/rear property line and the proposed 99 sq. ft. wood landing will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the Page 3,June 7,2018 #7138,Teicher SCTM No. 1000-111-15-8.2 neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The Nassau Point Road neighborhood consists of single family water front homes. The bulkhead structure and retaining wall landward of the bulkhead and steps to the beach were constructed with Trustees approval to protect the bluff and the applicant's property and is a typical feature in this neighborhood (Board of Southold Town Trustees Permit No. E 111-15-82, dated 12-21-1992. The proposed wood landing is part of a staircase leading to the beach. Grant of the zero setback variance for a proposed wood platform/landing associated with proposed rebuilt steps along the bluff to the beach is greater than any bluff setback variance in the neighborhood and will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. To protect the environment, structures should be set back from bluffs to the greatest extent practicable,per LWRP policy. 2. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance for the rear yard setback to the proposed wood landing because it is necessary for the proposed staircase to the beach, which is characteristic to the waterfront area. The structure is in place with an approval from the Town to protect a naturally regulated feature and cannot be feasibly moved. The proposed zero foot bluff setback to a proposed wood platform can be achieved without a variance. The applicant can re-design the proposed staircase to the beach and/or use at grade pavers "as of right"to achieve the same goal. 3. Town Law§267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance granted herein for the rear yard setback is mathematically substantial,representing 73%relief from the code. However,a staircase to the beach has been in place without issue for many years, and the applicant is removing existing decking between the bulkhead and the retaining wall. The variance denied for the zero foot setback from the top of the bluff for a proposed wood platform/landing is substantial representing 100%relief from the code. 4. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(4.). No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code and submit two copies of a storm water management and control plan for review and approval prior to the installation of any new drainage. Moreover, the applicant must maintain a non-turf buffer along the top of the bluff and obtain the Board of Trustees approval. 5. Town Law $267-b(30)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6. Town Law 4267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a staircase to the beach with landing while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. Denial of the requested relief for the zero foot setback for the proposed wood platform/landing on top of the bluff is not the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of steps to the beach while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Weisman (Chairperson), seconded by Member Planamento, and duly carried,to DENY the variance relief as requested for the bluff setback for a proposed wood landing; GRANT the relief as applied for the rear yard setback from the tie line/rear property line to the proposed wood landing as shown on the site plan by Marshall Paetzel,LA dated April 30,2018. Page 4,June 7,2018 #7138,Teicher SCTM No. 1000-111-15-8.2 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1)That applicant shall obtain approval from the Town's Board of Trustees. 2) The applicant shall maintain in perpetuity a minimum 10 foot non-turf vegetated buffer landward of the top of the bluff 3)No stormwater runoff from structures on the property shall be directed toward the bluff The deck shall remain open to the sky That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the survey, site plan andlor architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variances)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Pursuant to Chapter 280-146(B) of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured, and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three (3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may,upon written request prior to the date of expiration, grant an extension not to exceed three (3) consecutive one (1)year terms. Vote of the Board: Ayes:Members Weisman(Chairperson),Dantes,Acampora,and Planamento: This Resolution was duly adopted(4-0). Leslie Kanes Weisman Chairperson c Approved for filing / o /2017 O m Q r� �� D - ` \1� SGP. . - 0 • t � { .i,. '�k� ��':Try.' ' 'r�� obi. � � ,e�"; i �iT:;`� -�'` 7t► ~�tB'H `�C'�`i. }#{�'� •.< b�•1 ••� ;�r+�T .��y ��ti •��4•�j,�'y i'� `�'' �� V.. .p.. '.����� ti vW ;� t'"�,eta�,},�,li.'� }}' '�'-� >+ � f W K. ,•jf�. i P,�-r� fr �•2, ��'' `�..'::•''`�Srs�'' ;`^!"t. �79'F �,r :.� Ss�s,�..3 ` �- -5 ..�Yi�..�, i F' ...a. , , r'S' •` •�� �(3,,(a�i• R`\ •7�r;f�.f�� .,,� `� •L �ljz�. t'S •�;' ;►:t��'�+���� - i �fr�Ssr Y��`� '�` �y`�,ix��y+'r�., ,�-• u. 4 •�`�; .� q1 �b a��'• ,R'i � .i1`n�'�� lw�. e_ '•� ,L'f!«.1 'ky ,},,,+� ��_ an`�i.;�� ��� �,,y,.�,•1x' w� �'.�. ,`f•• �^"'r •�"t �t���"��"' i �: �, �•� �• - � w. -�.>c;�,a hF'•1j.Y(4ky"hr "y.St,C'�. Ci !'h'\�`��b;�l/{' l �.��. i� •�tle •y,F„�J",, r.. �'�� � tom• .G '� ✓«\� '� '=`��„ � �' YW���+� �,t*�� ynetc FF.z.F 4���( L r '- � 1 .� ��e '�f3'•• �, nor+�.,r • ..j 3`f(!-,�t �'y�`� �}�{ �� f7nt'�y� .y. �x "'��_ ...-.- � "�°Ty�.� �•� � �. �. '1�.}'. }` a' >�• '�-�"t,�r� �:. �yy�+�� ty�r�dY�. �• '' '.4.''�c ''�.''�}t Y' t �.�- 't� * :l'6• ..�_;� �., �i �'4.�, t`Ff"t ijS f��I�+•■'�"klt�?•4 �•• „? .�.. fix_ !• .n `1• i7 4 .�t= c��� cay'� 4' 'h ay:KS �a. ^� )+Y{, �<.�� 5�...J •lam '� ,a ���'•a 3•'� '►.,- r�C r�f. f, Irl I• - + r " , � 'a ,� l 1,y� s '- ��, '. meq,` t a. "r,ty1 -� ,1t,.. .*•4. .! 4 0 l� °ix�T i, Ar �yt. �t �•�' � 'motif`+ :1, +�� � 'f ;< �;: >a. . t / y 4•, t F ,�' } _ ra 1 4 �;7F025 Nassau Foints•Rd �J�� ��,� • , L ',��� � 3�r- �'i''."Mlla- If YY�• ` 1 nen,, '�, 1�r of `-�. ti• y. ak1.: 1? �'...T a"4�„ '•N ',T.'t4 '+C'' '� c j S i • f�F' w, •! '� el! 't Arc K.S f � 4 �1�,! ,, r,a��z` •.� � �L�. .•N��1� ° '� !SP dtk ` a C��:. �4�¢ri {j•`�,y)� J. FR�Y.�,`ii •, } F���`�•,�1����.�''{w�1 _t' YA ,r�.?•j''� Y'.�:��,vi'��• ',�•.1, fl••.. •.1!;/e� j.,' •r ���� ��•�.'.''-el. ,+�+: �, .:i,3�`• � { z i�,b.t; r't• "'` ',.:ria 9 ej■ +rlt f "i4 1 r''�•� �t ;i�'�:`. +�: \� r� ••�•a }�y�� •^ K'}`w vt.:1 ` � f�� .l •,i�y��c. ) ��.'�� y�,.,�,SYT '�� fL_� �\' �' r �r , r�, .i., � ' ii f a�••il►e�� ♦,�. 1'.� 3a-i'\+�57s:� •.,f 'r } i�n +k.. .� Ja•. "` -Of". 1'Y:4-J �• M yl ,,,``iii- � t ,•w \ }-f'Sf.••� �� ��J -I� \ } '• jj� �y� F!x�.' a eAlY 4y_ � ��' ��'Srtly k �� •� 'a' .'.� � v'3{ )i-. /.a'�a .1l� '� - �� t vA T��t•! a r� � � 3�z��,�'^� � �.r .t. ` •,X .�l `� �t;� �,�iij i ,l �- ~.. ��.` "��• �,� `��L rYd}.a�.� ,.��_, �^..•�y c`t �al���► ��y. qW 2'00 ft 7OWN OF SOUTHOLDPERTH' REi OWNER_ STREET �`N.. VILLAGE DISTRICT SUB. LOT`S—�2— \1 adr 4>T�'" rl /�a act 7L 1 .sr eT FORMER OWNER1 N ----- — -- E - ACREAGE - S W TYPE OF BUILDING RES, I' SEAS. VL. --- FARM --- COMM. I IND. -- CBS I MISC, '^ LAND — IMP. TOTAL DATE j REMARKS C3 It; 1 4 e b/ G Le ot f�t -�r-- �•"' i -- a � / X — _ o i11 Y) CCS o p ` rJ�U bi�'t - ?-3-- y P f 15-1 Zff/ C- AGE BUILDING CONDITION NEW NORMAL BELOWABOVE Form Acre Value Per Acre 1 Value 32 p 3�Z00 Tillable 1 � � ----- --- -- --- -- -- - --------- - - ------- ���..,. Tillable 2 i Tillable 3 I Woodland � ---- ------------- --- - - , Swampland Brushlar� - a House Plot f i Total 3 N/0/F VASILIS FTHENAKIS z CHRISTINE FTHENAKIS z 304.70' � 1 1 CtWN LINK CE PIPE 1 BOARD —g—————'T WALL `�fip2 1�2'SE k l 2. MON.'0.9'S 1 c IC. N f �.�z�l RUNEWARYUB"suo WrrrII DIRT do GRAVEL «\\ � I` I I / _ ` 111 \ 1 \ \ 111111 1�1 WOOTEswop-loST T 30.5' SUtKHEA� c N ` 1 ` UUL, CD a/ ° °" 1 1 a M �1 .a. o. °. .a � ,, w � b 4 1 z -l.0 U t ° ° � [hp o5TAIR5 8 LANDIilC�S , IPO mo W K ROCK WA# C)t W .O i W xNE a `�C ,4 ITION m 8 1p.Q x � m N ' 1 EXUnNG W000 CK 1 'f•::. gN� 0 BE REMOVED 1 x ;z := mm �I i 1 1 1� z11 11 1 1 1 A 1 �Z / EXWNG WOOD m N LANDING {O BE REMO c P PROPOS t ` ('� 1 O SOTEPS� 20.3' ,x$9 S?EP5 i i1� r W — — PROP .. ::r:: ^'%•::'ADDITI :;. .::.::;:: ,`, 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I \ Q Cfl - W: ::.:::::::::::::::;: :::::::':. 11 11 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 / V< / xIXL2 \ i X ! � \ k�.6 � X•�2 � i1 l i ` �` \ ` \ ``_�c\WOOD BUIKNE0 al to a 48 AD w o LOT N/0/F NEIL P. STRONSKI PATRICIA M. PEREZ •. moi �.,. - . � , �s E •� •.1 - L g i F rGC 1 �H � yK{►�!' t� Y f f TP y.. n L f AL WIWI 4 03 -2b . 2021 02 . 05 I I two w '" wr. LJ'•- 03 . 26 ? � . t a n "TiR- Jli1 r' f k a y 7025 NASSAU POINT ROAD 1 DRAWING LIST A-000 COVER SHEET A-001 SITE PLAN i A-101 EXISTING CELLAR PLAN A-102 EXISTING GROUND FLOOR PLAN I i A-103 PROPOSED CELLAR PLAN I A-104 PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN A-105 PROPOSED SECOND PLAN A-106 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN i- A-201 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS A-202 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 1 jr� i,•,� - ',��n,�,-;tea .,•' 11W �� •� "'.°i8 - 3•.. ; Imo- ,r. C4i;4'.'�l.Y'`f�'� ( ! ' -- •6.T' ,�r, t� -A�„kaYFf�.,F'y�Ycc�.-4n..11y, 'it.p�+- — � � )�t�'�• -.-. � + ' f- - flfl3 7' 1 TRUSTEEREVIEW 031121 No. Issue Data Seal q x'g .”``-t�y+yjN.�.`-t„o^t.' f�- 'eva^ ��P'?.1``a"%s'' .•'�.s3 �EFtEO AR4C� Tj, ma,w yoa- FOp ^ Architect- PRATT+BLACK ARCHITECTS _ 66 PALMER AVE,SUITE 48 BRONXVILLE•NY 10708 ili Project r 7025 NASSAU POINT RD CUTCHOGUE,NY 11936 i - _ COVER SHEET DATE --- 031120.21 PROJECTNO. j SCALE _—_—�— i DRAWING ND_ ! r N� A-000 j ------ — —�� Pae ra< B i I i OI ' VASI I i VASILIS FTHENA ` EOOEOFASwutr �BiObGOEF?tiOE r—bum wMFEts5 CHRISTINE FTMENANAKIS ORNE,YAY tlhiC0.E'IE BIOOCWALL --' , . RPE I ' i � _—=�--�-"""1_ ;—�—��— 1—_� W,CIfBWR� � N-iNEE 1<-TGEE j'j { ' I{: � • I ,�\\\ t� �'i � ' i it �____�{— tOp 5 �--�'jj t t ` \t \1 t ` 'i(• 1 lOw wnTER nwttnvlvin i . 1 r�ocERow I! tl wR !I auiAo �/' BnPTOGIBx•IFAO I,�i JI e¢cwxowrxcurse T�i EasmaI STORY .—S FRA AND GA AGE NASSAU POINT ROAD j AND GARAGE ,o' t I 1— LITTLE PECONIC17 BAY i as xTowvEWAY `/ I BTEPsm woEauE3ei aaacwAu � f p91>EPAN-B 1; i i i l 1 t 4, •1 1 �� i i � I f.EnaERowv ssmvEstEcs _, _ � ,za � 1 i ; 1 � 1 •I t,` it �k'--�-7__.__—t�roe ocsoPE . t I { ' EDOEOFPAVEYENr POR ��— —_ _I �-- �_I-,ra___'I`—._,a.v _F\,1 i �VI {1� � � 1 �1 1 'rl � •` I � ` 1 I ` I I �- m=b.slwE__�,•t1 ` `,•,1\\`\ \t 1 �,\ i 1 TRUSTEE REVIEW 031121 LOTS= ly I \ ovawEaowmEs AREA=SO.SSfi SFl_�_ ANO Issue — Date i Dmf ac r -- --�-- Seal• tlDlfi'/POLE l� woonn�nlwEAo-� . Boxcuox �ReD Aao WO/F 1 NEILP STRONSM cc PATRICIAM PEREZ - 9j. o3afeB 02- { Arch,tect- , PRATT+BLACK i ARCHITECTS N , ? 66 PALMER AVE,SUITE 48 ' PROPOSED SRE PLAN I BRONXVILLE,NY 10708 1HB•=1d' i P7025 NASSAU POINT RD CUTCHOGUE,NY 11935 PROPOSED SITE PLAN + IDATE 0311.2021_ PRC UECT NO _ SCALE DRAWN SY x DRAWING NO_ 4 A-001 ' i I I I 1 : DEMOLITION LEGEND i -� EXISTING CONSTRUCTIONTO ' REMAIN ' I _ EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO BE ' REMOVED ' I I 1 1 ' � I I ! � x,15'" I I • I I I -------------J- =31= GARAGE 23'rX28-rt BASEMENT CH 97°I —___—__—___BASETtT , I __ __d zz-s•x28-ze-r i I ' GARAGE 1 _=T__ . CH.98" - UNDERSIDE OF DUCTS ---- 87 9" --"879" L m i`.W,• 5r;-,'^-__; 1 TRUSTEE 03 , �T EREVIEW 1121 ,T-------------- ----r, -------------------- , _ - No ssue ate �tiFLED ARO U�5 .oR°ssEge y�� Y ' qT L287 O1 SOF NEN Arch - I � PRATT+BLACK ARCHITECTS 66 PALMER AVE,SUITE 48 ! " BRONXVILLE,NY 10708 ' Project I , 7025 NASSAU POINT RD I CUTCHOGUE,NY 11935 EXISTING CELLAR PLAN ! - 1 Dere 02.01.2021 ; I PROJECT NO-- SCA.E ,I CELLAR DEMOLITION PLAN DRAWN Br V4-•I-0• DRAWING NO -! N� A 101 DCMOLMON LEGEND 1 , I ' I EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO I REMAIN EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO BE ' ' i --- REMOVED � I I ' I I i , BATIIROOM2 J �(o\} s'-r x s•-zo• U BATH 2?4 '; CH.96" MASTER BED {�=S"—_ -_'•'� LIVING/DINING ROOM, _ _-- ____— LnnNGIDINuvG RGOw I ' CH.96 4" WICK " CH 96 4" ! 23'.r X IT-8 ` ,f I MASTERSEDROOM 13.6* ' BEDRGCbtz {t i 124'x,2-n• i I � '�" I • t--'..__� •,R 14{.y.. k —X'4'X1 KITCHEN ;�,p { I - II ` CH.964'• I { I 84'X,141• BED � —' BED CH 96' �i CH 90" BATH 1 eATRRooM 1 ra xe-r CH 96"' ✓ _I i I i - _ 1 TRUSTEE REVIEW 03 11 21 111 I "'�,''. { ��� I ```• ` 1 No. Issee Sear I�----_- - t ; wfy ....� wcaf- --_ .x,f.• gERHD ARPP�y'C�yy i I i . 9p o2s/BD {O� I SOF NEyI ' " Architect: I , PRATT+BLACK ARCHITECTS 66 PALMER AVE,SUITE 48 I ' BRONXVILLE,NY 10708 Project. , 7025 NASSAU POINT RD CUTCHOGUE,NY 11935 EXISTING GROUND FLOOR PLAN w I ' ' FDATE -- 02.012021 j PROJECT NO � • SCALE IST FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN oRAunNG No tta•-t•ar A-102 No 1 1 . I I - L•WLK-N-i,LO5E7 � D005 5 r x s s• ! ' c i _o____ T28' --------------- 0004 ! ZJ'- X -T - , ` W903 a —� I -----�_SECXiFNICAL ROOMSIX- I ` Ii ! Ii OT —GAME ROOM ! s �I 1G-S X 28-T vI I � I �! zrrxza•-rl ii �) 11 I / I i GnrHrf= BATHROOM 1 � { t� ( s•-rxr-,o• 1 , r ( 1 i IL_ l__ I ' D003 alp_ --- - AUNDRY ' , x81p• 5'-TXC 10' D002 I��N 1 TRUSTEE REVIEW 031121 1 ��. T Issus _L Dete I - Seal:LE .v ED001 E0002 i 211111 ', IL r l ji'1 411 — IED ARD�� --_CEUARFOYER 2,'Yx8•a- F—'amu 2]5 X8A -- Ly II l 64 r F I - T Gza]5G y0 , I Op NE`N 1 " � Architect ' PRATT+-BLACK ARCHITECTS 66 PALMER AVE,SUITE 48 ' - BRONXVILLE,NY 10708 r i Project: I 0C26 NASSAU POINT RD� UTCHOGUE,NY 11935 PROPOSED CELLAR FLOOR PLAN DATE 02 01 202 PROJECTNO [!CA.LE - ICRAWN BY ! .. ,j PROPOSED CELALR FLOOR PLAN ' I J �oRAwrvG rvo 1 1 V A-103 N I l t x7-fu' 24•-9 I ED103 1 —i W108 W107- - - -- - - -- - - - , • W708 \\ / ernawut, i + j� __"•__-r,--�� _ _. � _----__1 i I t LANG RDOM I 23'-TX16.,0. i (i 5771 J BATHROOMS STa• I Lrn vwva:c • `} i - XT-- L o, -- I (/��� I BEDROOMS i �i 7T 4'X77'-B' •� I W1W DN' F-11LI r t J+ PORCH + --dL �.J. I 13'6'%32'-2' I'I I �e� _ i J1�f Ilill'IOIi+i IIj�J Ilitll 4Yill 4�III 0153 0102 + +L I iCC E01D Di 8 f = 1 I i Witt \Dt05+I 0106 I I _.� _ El i BEOROOM2 Fj .� - -J-� L t_..T-it-11'X12I -! I - - I1 I-�_� i IL S—i KrTCMEN 1 i Y �I W706 r 12W i I BATHROOM2— e eznlx eenaowel II + �� '- tz•6'xtt'-to' r __ n-n•x,z-:r tr�'x,r-1o• -- [--I 16-rx,zr i r _, LI, TRUSTEE REVIEW 031121' — •--D 7' o Issue Date Seal• • i W701 W,02 W103 W704 j'I+II�� �i �i{F' 9 I � • I O O O O ullltll:Ili i�ljll:lllu ill me6 ar ___, !i� I + STORAGE b 5'4•%C6 W106 510, ,6-rxmr i -r-- I+t y--_�_ t `yt oPOur.�(CHI• !!! 1B•-Txs-r --- -------�------- (I F L � I �9p c2Brao OXY i. Eo1ot PN —� i --- -` - �Archltect: ( ! - PRATT+BLACK d I ARCHITECTS 66 PALMER AVE,SUITE 48 r 1 BRONXVILLE,NY 10708 Project. � 7025 NASSAU POINT RD CUTCHOGUE,NY 11935 j PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN—� 1 j DAATE - 02 01 2021 I I 110f TNO --- -_-- I 1 ' i60nLE t _LROPOSED IST FLOOR PLAN 'DRAINN 9Y 1 ifr•1'-0' I DRAWING NO , A-104 i • i • ' zr a • I i ' , ElI I moa t I I • MASTER BED ZZRG00., I, z=-5x,rs e — 41 D203 77 I Ct— WAU141NCLOSET ! �� \ Dza2 �, T�oz, li _`_� I aaxs•,r f I 1 asx5-,s• I ! i • fia-x Ise- I ; -"-" -- __ _� —_� - - _---BATHR00%,3 F e-z•ztse- j 0204mez �x, ' D20t 'I `r SA'x5-„- —` ---"------'-------- WALIC.INCLGSET i i j -� t,•I.I'I I I li I. i!Vj t 1 TRUSTEE REVIEW 031121 N0. Issue Date -------------- ---------------------------- ----------- I seal —� 6a•zas � ? I I - . OPEN Tom— SrMNG AREA - _�_ 6'-8•x8.3 N i I jI Areh,tacL • 1 I PRATT+BLACK � ARCHITECTS 66 PALMER AVE,SUITE 48 i BRONXVILLE.NY 10708 - I Project. •1• , 7025 NASSAU POINT RD i CUTCHOGUE,NY 11935 r PROPOSED SECOND ' - ---FLOOR PLAN i DATE 02 01 2021 PROJECT NO ! SCALE ! .� PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR PLAN t>s,AWING N0_ N� A-1 05 Pae w i , i ITS' I, • 'i I I f I ' ' i —_____________________ 11 TRUSTEE REVIEW 0311.21 ' No Issue Date Seal I f ' ~ I 60 AR,, i 4i goy a eu y'T�Ci 9T 478199 y0� • - - FOP NgvN Architect• PRATT"BLACK ARCHITECTS 66 PALMER AVE,SUITE 48 !- 9RONXVILLE,NY 10706 - i Project 7025 NASSAU POINT RD CUTCHOGUE,NY 11935 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN ��TE —02 D1 2021 PCT NO — i 1 SCALE A PROPOSED ROOF P— !DRAWN sv N' .1'-0 DRAWING NO_ N� A-106 • -----------'-- F11 Na --�— I 27.3 j RI-� DGE BEAM I IL I L"JI I I I 11'-0' TL � I i 2ND FFL ; I t I - - i 1ST FFL SOUTH ELEVATION RIDGE21'-3 i I I1 TAUSTEEREVIEW 0311.21 i `•�II 1{r.No- Issue_—Date I I Seat 14'-7' I• 1 I ' RIDGE BFAM I\ I SE1tE0 ARCy 1 i'-0 2ND FFL 8-5 i F ATTIC JOIST - _ I I I OF N6`� Architect. ----- - ` ILL ' PRATT+BLACK i ARCHITECTS ITp.-0. p•-0• 66 PALMER AVE,SUITE 48 FFL —'- ---- — -- 1ST FFL BRONXVILLE,NY 10708 f _ � I Protect I — I I 7025 NASSAU POINT RD CUTCHOGUE,NY 11935 PROPOSED a 17 ELEVATIONS 9 1• CELLAR FFL --� GARAGEFFL - oAre 02 7 PROJECT NODPAI 2WEST O ELEVATION MWI eT 1/S•1'-0• DRAWING NO- A-201 � N � - Fie No_ RI 7" \ RIDGE BEAM n i ATTIC JOIST I - 1ST 00"FL GARAGE FFL f �' ' ` NORTH ELEVATION 1 1/d'•1-P - ' { t 7 ry - RIDGE BEAM 1 TRUSTEE REVIEVd 031121 No Issue Date___ - ! 1� Seal. t RIDGE BEAM F t FDA tr0^D I G ! € a 2NFFL ! 1 I ! I B.S.• e29M I 9 ATTIC JOIST ��. { -� -1 I OF NES ---- l+ ,1 Architect `— ------) - , PRATT+BLACK { ! - -0V-- ARCHITECTS I 0'-0' ______ --,__— __�®_ � 66 PALMER AVE,SUITE 48 1 1ST FFL - Y tST FFL � RONXVILLE,NY 70708 projEI C- ------ 7025 NASSAUPOINT RD CUTCHOGUE,NY 11935 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ,_1„ CELLAR F I r- G8A1AGE FFL DATE 02 01 2021 ' PROJECT NO --- SCALE DRAWN BY .Z 1'EASTELEVATION J IDRAWWGNO- - -0- • N� A-202 i1 Filer No - - . 0 32 3 16A(c) IN 4" Q, e IV Q1,ko, S IP zu 'In — V is - 7pp MENHADEN I. I- Nli kol TN TN OT% -Z (0) Oro 162 A o 3 &I ,G- 16 8 cat6 15 7 A 1 1A(c) 13 Oro, va ss 09, 10 ,o) VA(c)- 141-1� 011 'IN S a Y11'I,- CA 9 1.6A(c) 19 9 C) 10 'ZO 28 -0 QA ITC (0, a I) L'In 0 1014 27 � i6 1 (0) Z_ - ,v 16 (O� L 0 --- 'Ti 2-9A(C) I'S I 171 17A 30 11. 0,ql 0 1AA(C All 0,01 1 1 I um cat ,G�A(cr 17A 0 3 1�(C) It , , -1,-21 L k., I 6A(C) ns 22 20 ias 22 Ir �20A(C) 5 5C Ac� 22 a k,41 -A� IN ko) % 7," 8B 7.1 as BAY 24 S 1 1AjQeI _I , is' I 0��cl IS 16 E 1, 11.52(.)11 A3; a LIA(C) -Can) iMON IP" 72 V3 DP I A ZIBA(C) r Yl k-t 1.7A(c)21.1 1 1A(c) V_r0A 7. A q t e, a '366 6 0 29 .3A(-, c)-36.7 5N 57. 1 3A(. 30 14A( cs ro mm 8 1.4 4. 2.6A(C) I 00TA FOR PCL NO 2 SEE SEC NO 36 4A 8 In I Z 118-01-011 _MXTCH EN_ 16 13A(C) Gtr o K 104 131 TOM OF SOUTHOLD SECTION NO NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK E Cy Y VILLAGE OF mL__ MAINTENANCE ALTERATION SALE OR Real Property Tax Service Agency ill DISTRIBUTION OFANY PORTION OF I - County Center Riverhead,N Y 11901 M 134 111 SLFF.LI(C.UNTY TAX NAPIS PROHIBITED '4-7 SCALE IN F- .TI(.LT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF 400 A DISTRICT NO 1000 "'I" REAL PROPERTY W SERVICEAGENCY P 116 PROPERTY MAP .—R.-DATE Dee 11 3018 SURVEY OF - LOT 52 jS D I AMENDED MAP A OF ppR 16 2021 ' NASSAU POINT lv OWNED BY NASSAU POINT C �n ==� PROPERTIES, INC. L� 1, _ �� �I,a� . I SECTION B FILE No. 745 FILED OCTOBER 4, 1919 EAST SITUATED AT NASSAU POINT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LOT 304.70 51 �—+ SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK , f o F W«N�#No�,�+N�q'�. F�-1 S.C. TAX No. 1000-111 -15-10 N�FTHENAKIS c m ��' `" 1 I I I I 1 y`'' CHRISTINE FTHENAKIS A Nom'\ ' 1 -- $ N SCALE 1 "=20' o AUGUST 27, 2003 Hr F N c m �`; I I PIPE CONC. \\\ \ i JUNE 11, 2013 ADD PROPOSED BULKHEAD MON. APRIL 11, 2018 UPDATE SURVEY N ro$ b A m 14 TRE \ W MARCH 11, 2019 ADD TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY L„�' / o/ CHAIN UNK�E�+cE x SCE Xm 24'TREE 1 1 \ \ \\ \ \ 1 s 0 MARCH 116, 2021 update TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY am,: RAMS GARAG1\2'S. I ' ''\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ N QZ ° zm m zs.� II 1.1 s ` \ \ L ,- AREA = 30,556 sq. ft. ed°' •. ; ' '; ^ . .•. d . e bE NSE' w . IBAs 6 II I 1n' \ I �pP%VaPE ''�� p gU i x m J (TO HIGH WATER TIE LINE)) 0.701 ac. e 4 . Q pop°O 0 O 0 �T DRI AY, '• d 1.1 S./I I`ggC�1K II 81,D' 8-` EDGE bF /SPHN / 1 cccz555 II VRUBBER MATS OVER °. • ••• .• d .. n AY BURIED \ m a° \ X • / / 1m II g GRAVEL=ii TEST HOLE 29.5 30.5' / 37.4X 36.2 0\4' .: Z d°. ::.11.4..:.. . � GE ROW X 18.8 // / gi II � �c� ���y��{�_1 14+.0 r::::.::.�:::• o • .. PIS �5 ' \ / / / ! \ z 6.8 • ' :'•° .d ° °d d. . ••z . w = STAN` b LP•NDIN ::i ::!, : ":'•' O •': W. C N 37.5 (Lp 0 IX22,2 // .• ; A .•'d.°'' .d /..+ °. • •°Z. rr,O � 3 4 PROP05FD / ,°' :• ° •, .. : 'O• .. ..�..• •d. •'. '° . , lot36.9 ADDITION ; �I I I I Im I I \ \� �b ° V ° a ° • 80. A. -4- BLdOCK CUR ING : ° / 6 • Q w d = a °. D I p(ISTING yW7�EPS I iZ o o X i / ° d 70 D DECK 1 °/ . d ° ;14 • AS HALT DRNE�A/AY- / :° ° ROCK WP D N TO BE REMOVED 7c e ° / /< • • • ROCK G7 r"I �i n w d 4. BELGLXN BLOCK CURBING' G' ° • / WALL X STEP! N �� •tL.L��\ \ \ \ 1 I ��o LO WATER LILINE �__ x � 7 / - KA ffl-OeEv I \ \ \ \ 1 1 1 1 1 ;c "a FINAL A 11 LQ 52 / p�ISTING OVED \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ I 1 \% Ln `� LANDING 0 BE REM REVIEWED �� 6.. o I r ;::::::�::•:.% 20.3' \ \ 1 \ \� w A �� SEPTIC Tee,,�� � ` °Po 5� � ::: ..... :;::: ::::::: :::: :: :. \ ��, \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \�,, �, SEE DECISION #11513 X2o•2 _�-CEJOOI.x24.� ry>^ / — — –pl2ppp5�DN ;_:;:.: I x o \\ \ \ ; �Z `t \ \ \ _ _ — ADDITI \� : : ':': ;': ' :............ .z:.: \ \ \ \ \ \� s DATED d ;�"��la o I \ ` — ! 13t�P05ED tJ� :. ` _ m \ � \ WOuu • 2t�4 x X \ \ �\ \\ �N�� �N311 .48 \It •� ss \ , X a•W . -,'•.• \ —_ \ \ \ \ / / I ' `� \ X 36"7 .�\� N\0 �p O+ A N e •�.� —77�,OVER'�IsAD X14-5 KIRES {►�� UTILITY LE 252 O ' LOT @ • V 00 NI0 TR NEIL PONSKI I .4•• / / M• PEREZ 14.4 ti" 5 Q / �" PATRICIA •� .• / Z �S 82 00,0 CERTINEP.DTSTONSKI 'ze PATRICIA M. PEREZ WORLD WIDE LAND TRANSFER " OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE TEST HOLE DATA PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM (TEST HOLE DUG BY SHAWN M. BARRON M.S. ON FEBRUARY 8, 2021) STANDARDS FOR TITLE SURVEYS AS ESTABLISHED BY THE LIALS. AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED EL 27.2 FOR SUCH USE..BY THE NEW YORK STATE LAND O' TITLE ASSOCIATION. SANDY LOAM (SM) •, °' •a SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL (SM) f C ; . MIXED SAND WITH GRAVEL (SP) d/� N.Y.S. Lic. No. 50467 NOTES: UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION 1. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.A.V.D. 1988 DATUM 17' TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF Nathan Taft Corwin III SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS:&.x EDUCATION LAW. EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: — —Xx- _ COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING Land Surveyor F.FL. - FIRST FLOOR THE LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR G.FL - GARAGE FLOOR EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED T.B. - TOP OF BULKHEAD TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY. B.B. - BOTTOM OF BULKHEAD CERTIFICATIONS INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN $UCCCSSOr TO: Stanley J. Isaksen, Jr. L.S. T.w. - TOP OF WALL ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY Y B.W. - BOTTOM OF WALL IS PREPARED, AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE Joseph A. Ingegno L.S. TITLE COMPANY, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON, AND Title Surveys - Subdivisions - Site Plans - Construction Layout TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTI- TUTION. CERTIFICATIONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE. PHONE (631)727-2090 Fax (631)727-1727 THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHTS OF WAY OFFICES LOCATED AT MAILING ADDRESS AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, IF 1586 Main Road P.O. Box 16 ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. Jamesport, New York 11947 Jamesport, New York 11947 38-0848