Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-53.-5-12.6 (2) F ` i OFFICE LOCATION: 0� $o(/Ty0MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex l0 P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 G�, • Telephone: 631 765-1938 ;oIyCOU NT`l, � LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry, AICP =Assistant Town Planning Director LWRP Coordinator Date January 13,2021 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for ZBA File PETER AND VALERIE SAKAS (BREEZY SHORES COTTAGE#16)47461 SCTM#1000-53=5-12:6. PETER AND VALERIE SAKAS (BREEZY SHORES COTTAGE#16)#7461 -Request for a Variance from Article XXIII, Section 280-123 and the Building Inspector's December 8,2020 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing seasonal cottage; at 1) a non- conforming building containing a non-conforming use shall not be enlarged,reconstructed, structurally altered or moved,unless such building is changed to a conforming use; at: 65490 Route 25, (Breezy Shores Cottage#16, -Adj.to-Shelter-Island-Sound)Greenport;NY-.-SCT-M#1000-53-5-12.6- ------ --------- - - - - - -- --- - -- ------ - —. - . The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of•Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program(LWRP)Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department,as well as the records available to me,the proposed action is EXEMPT from LWRP review pursuant to: § 268-3. Definitions. MINOR ACTIONS item`BB"which state: BB.Additions to an existing dwelling constituting less than 25%of the existing structure where the addition is greater than 75 feet from a natural protective feature, exceptwhere the parcel is located in a coastal erosion hazard area,- Pursuant rea,Pursuant to Chapter 268,the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: William Duffy, Town Attorney BOARD MEMBERS ®� SOU Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ®�� cif®l 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 ® Southold,NY 11971-09.59 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes u, Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. • COQ 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento ®lyc®upm Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtowiiny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS R � I�_��_ _ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD F Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 DED 1 2020 Soutnola Town Planning Board December 18, 2020 Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold,NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. #7461 Breezy Shores Comm c. (Sakas #16) Dear Mark: We have received an application r additio s and alterations to an existing seasonal cottage. A copy of the Building In pector' Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map, proj ct de cription form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with reco e dations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-51) is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman Chairperson By: Encl. Survey/Site plan: Frank Uellendahl, architect dated August 17, 2020 AF l FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: September 4, 2020 RENEWED: December 8, 2020 TO: Farnk Uellendahl (Breezy Shores#16) PO Box 316 Greenport,NY 11944 Please take notice that your application dated November 24, 2020 For additions and alterations to an existing seasonal cottage at Location of property: 65490 Route 25, Greenport,NY Breezy Shores Cottage#16), County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 53 Block 5 Lot 12.6 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed additions and alterations are not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII Section 280-123 A.,which states; "A nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged or structurally altered or moved, except as set forth below, unless the use of such building changed to a conforming a conforming u ed 'gna Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application,may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file,Z.B.A. i iI l Fee-$ Filed By: Assignment No. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS ���AA g'�IQ AREA VARIANCE House No.&5490 Street ,41M 9DA42 Hamlet =4 &nW(6) SCTM 1000 Section Block ,5 Lot(s) 12 Lot Size 924 4Z Zone %�P-00 I(WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED ® BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 10 Owner(s): Mailing Address: 242 E 1g 'V. Xe rEk) IrOtp&O MeL141003 Telephone!FI-15W _IX Fax: Email: 6.4a NOTE:In addition to the above,please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agent, architect,builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative: }NK A5464for M Owner( )Other: Address: 123 AVE . 06 314 1 6066 ;009rr 1,1Y 119-41 Telephone:A 47Z-4241?ax: Email: 41k.ue&44"t7 U 441, `M Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to,from file above names: _____()Applicant/Owner(s), M Authorized Representative, ( ) Other Name/Address below: _ WHEREBY TJIE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE rLAN DATED PLY V90 and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED FOR: Building Permit ( ) Certificate of Occupancy ( ) Pre-Certificate of Occupancy O Change of Use ( )Permit for As-Built Construction ( ) Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article,Section,Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers.Do not quote the code. Article: xY III Section: �'-��2J Subsection: Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: ( )A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( ) A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ( )Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ( ) Reversal or Other A prior appeal 06 has, ( ) has not been made at any time with respect to this property, UNDER Appeal No(s). Year(s). . (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our office for assistance) Name of Owner ZBA File# 4242 1994 - SAGE 6660 (2013) - MIZRAHY 6934 2016 - SCHMIDT 6525 2012 - OTANO 6661 (2013) - WILLOUGHBY 7223 2018 - NELSON 6557 2012 - OTANO 16704 2014 - FLOTTERON 17408 2020 - PETSKY 6622 2013 - MULLMAN #6862 2015 - BROOKS i Name of Owners: PETER AND VALERIE SAKAS ZBA File# REASONS FOR APPEAL (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if granted, because: It has been determined by the Town of Southold that the cottages at Breezy Shores Community, Inc. constitute non-conforming buildings containing a non-conforming residential use.Therefore the Building Department has determined that relief is required to undertake the proposed renovations and alterations because the structure will not be changed to a conforming use.This unique property represents its own neighborhood of 82.6 acres with substantial wetlands and it's far removed from neighboring properties so that no adjacent property owner will be adversely impacted by the proposed structural improvements.The addition will increase the size of the existing structure by less than 3%. (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: Due to the pre-existing, non-conforming residential use of the cottage that cannot be enlarged and structurally changed, it is not possible to make the proposed improvements to the cottage without the requested relief from the code. (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: The footprint expansion of only 17 SF(2.95%increase)is located landward of the existing cottage at a distance of+/-78 feet from the bulkhead. In prior decisions related to other Breezy Shores applications involving proposed footprint enlargements of less than 3%the Board has deemed such increases to be de minimus in nature. (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: Due to the isolated location of the property a variance relief in this community will not produce a negative impact on the physical or environmental conditions. (5) Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? (X) Yes, or ( ) No. Why? Yes, because the applicants bought the cottage after the Zoning Code was in effect and knew about the limitations regarding alterations to the structure,however,the need for a variance is not necessarily self- created because a seasonal dwelling requires periodically some degree of structural adjustments and alterations to continue the safe use of the structure,in this case upgrade bathroom to code and raise porch roof to gain code compliant ceiling height and adding a loft dormer. Are there any Covenants or Restrictions convicerrning this land? (X) No ( ) Yes This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community By signing below, I certify all informationis true and correctto the , Pt of my knowledge. Sworn to before me this ......... ....io ................................................ �..... day of pe tWk22_020 Sign ure of Authorized Agent :,d-livelf Notary JA�K TRACEY L, DWYER NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YQI-qK NO.01 DW63069QQ QUALIFIED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 30,2Vj�a�,', APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For ZBA Reference) Applicant: �-PA)it-, LA eL(ajaaa ' 12 q Date Prepared: go2o I. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: o IIIl''� j.5 c. /OQ. �7G7�2�?IONS 11. New Construction Areas(New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: ,5 L O" X Dimensions of new second floor: oe`I Dimensions of floor above second level: Height(from finished ground to top of ridge): Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes,please provide height(above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: /VIIIIIIIj III. Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes) (attach extra sheet if necessary)- Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: /-STD, y' StC�SONe�C. D L. Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: 1- IV. -N. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage(from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: 16?r+ �(= Proposed increase of building coverage: f^ Square footage of your lot: 8(0 Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: AIR V. Purpose of New Construction: AGE ,vz) r1�91sE PC 24 ,q ,200- aaw 10 — 15A-MW- A00177D" TD E'k1L,P12&t_;-; IIrI 4601MgoDm VI. Please describe the land contours (flat,slope %, heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): Wit? L AAJL) LAW RC1 A4A0-51'( AP.EF1 Please submit seven (7) photos, labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction), and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 7/2002; 2/2005; 1/2007 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION A. Is the subject premis s listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes No B. Are ere any proposals to change or alter land contours? No Yes please explain on attached sheet. C. l.)Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? Vf�5 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? 3.)Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? 4.)If your property contains wetlands or pond areas,have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: Aep Lf ; Ft(-�j] and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. �� 0�e 510 D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? �Jo E. Are there any patios,concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting? A10 Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? k-)47 If yes,please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as'approved by the Building Department and please describe: G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking,please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? 4/0 If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. I. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel ��i�A�G�t��L eco 1 �7 .annd the proposed use S;06 1aC_ ��' G� i[11 C`7 R�� AC1,1 J/ c [Q6 (ex:existing single family,proposed:same with "1g r ge,pool or other) � 1� (l4- Lp Authoritd signature nd Date TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NONCONFORMING PREMISES DATE: July 24, 1984 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the Pre C.0.#Z 12637 Land /X/ Building(s) 1:X/ Use(s) located at 67380 Main Road Arshamomague Greenport I Street Hamlet shown on County tax map as District 1000, Section 053.Q0, Block OS.00 Lot 001 .001 , doesknot)conform to the present Building Zone Code of the Town of Southold for the following reasons: There are 6 dwellings on one lot There are S non nnform;na seasonal cottages. On the basis of information presented to the Building Inspector's Office, it has been determined that the above nonconforming %/Land /x/Building(s) /X/Use(s) existed on the effective date the present Building Zone Code of the Town of Southold. and may be continued pursuant to and subject to the appli- cable provisions of said Code. IT IS FURTHER CERTIFIED that, based upon information presented to the Building Inspector's Office, the occupancy and use for which this Certifi- Property contains 5-1 story houses, 1-2 story Bate is issued is as follows: house, 2-accessory bldgs. , 25 seasonal cottages, 2 garages, 2 sheds (37 bldgs. ) . This `property has access to Rt 25 a State maintained highway, in the A zone.Non-conforming seasonal dwellings. Charlotte Sage, Michael Sage, James Sage The Certificate is issued to & Patricia Sage. (owner. of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval , N/A j UNDERZVRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N/A I NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the owner of the above premises HAS NOT CONSENTED TO AN DZSPECTION of the premises by the Building Inspec- tor to determine if the premises comply with all applicable codes and ordin- ances, other than the Building Zone Code, and therefore, no such inspection has been conducted. This Certificate, therefore, does not, and is not intended to certify that the premises comply with all other applicable codes and regula- tions. Buildinc, inspector o�gtlffajrIre G Town of Southold 3/22/2016 0 P.O.Box 1179 o _ 53095 Main Rd Southold,New York 11971 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: 38160 Date: 3/22/2016 THIS CERTIFIES that the building RESIDENTIAL REPAIRS Location of Property: 65490 Route 25,Greenport SCTM#: 473889 Sec/BIock/Lot: 53.-5-12.6 Subdivision: Filed Map No, Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated 1/8/2016 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 40406 dated 1/14/2016 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is: REPAIR AN EXISTING COTTAGE(#16)-FOOTINGS,AS APPLIED FOR The certificate is issued to Breezy Shores Comnty Inc of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED Au q ' e Signa re BOARD MEMBERS ®�so Ul Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 �® l® Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes v, 44C Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. • i� 5437.5 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento �I�COn Southold NY 11971 RECEIVED http://southoldtownny.gov ;Z"36 11_� ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,. UG 2 5 2020 TOWN OF SOUTHOLII) n �G�� Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 SO - Oed Town ke FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATIO MEETING OF AUGUST 20,2020 ZBA FILE: 7408 NAME OF APPLICANT: Mike& Mary Beth Petsky PROPERTY LOCATION: 65490 Route 25,Greenport,NY,(Breezy Shores Cottage#10) SCTM No. 1000-53-5-J2.6 SE RA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions,without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated March 9, 2020 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268,Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (L)ARP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued his recommendation dated July 22, 2020. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available, it is recommended that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards,and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject parcel is located in the R-80 Zoning District and contains 82. 6 acres. It is improved with three dwellings, a brick building, two garages, 28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds. Access to the property is via Sage Boulevard,which is a private road, and the property is adjacent on the south to Shelter Island Sound. The Breezy Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted in the history of the Town. The multiple cottages on the property are pre-existing non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900's. The cottages previously housed employees of the Sage family brick factory, and after the brickyard closed, they were rented as seasonal cottages. In 2000, a real estate cooperative, Breezy Shores Community Inc. was -established, and shares were offered as an ownership interest in the Cooperative. The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage# 10 and is owned by Mike&Mary Beth Petsky. The cottage,with proposed improvements, is shown on the Site Plan of Breezy Shores,prepared by Robert Brown Architect,dated November 2019. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for a Variance from Article XXIII, Section 280-123 and the Building Inspector's January 2, 2020 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a building permit to make additions and alterations to an existing seasonal cottage, at; 1) a non-conforming building containing a non-conforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed, structurally altered or moved,unless such building is changed to a conforming f r Page 2,August 20,2020 #7408,Petsky STM No. 1000-53-5-12 6 use; at: 65490 Route 25, (aka Sage Boulevard, Breezy Shores Cottage #19, Adj. to Shelter Island Sound) Greenport,NY.SCTM#1000-53-5-12.6, RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a variance to construct additions and alterations to an existing nonconforming seasonal cottage measuring an additional 21.8 sq. ft., less than 3% increase in overall size, when such changes to a nonconforming structure containing a nonconforming use are not allowed by Code. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The file contains a memo submitted by the Board of Breezy Shores Inc., dated February 5, 2020, stating their approval of the applicants proposed cottage renovation. Testimony was taken during the hearing from the architect that the subject structure was going to be raised, and new foundations installed to FEMA requirements to make the structure compliant. The applicant in a letter dated August 5, 2020, acknowledged that the application erroneously omitted a new foundation and lifting of the cottage, although noted on the drawings. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on August 6,2020,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. This unique property represents its own neighborhood of 82.6 acres. It contains substantial buffer of wetlands along the northern boundary of the property, and the enclave of cottages is sufficiently removed from other adjacent neighborhood properties so that adjacent property owners will not be affected by an additions and alterations. 2. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The existing seasonal cottage is a pre-existing non- conforming building with a pre-existing non-conforming use. As a consequence of the non-conforming status, any proposed additions and alterations will require relief from the code. 3. Town Law 4267-.b(3)(b)(3). The variance(s) granted herein granted herein for the alterations and additions is mathematically substantial, representing 100% relief from the code because Section 280-123 prohibits the enlargement of non-conforming buildings with non-conforming uses. However, the proposed addition of 21.3 square feet to the existing structure represents 2.98 % increase in the size of the pre-existing cottage footprint. The Board in prior decisions related to other Breezy Shore applications involving proposed increases of structure less than 3 %, has deemed such increases, to be de minimus in nature. This applicant's proposed increase in structure size is minor and is just squaring off the building that is already being Iifted to conform to FEMA codes. 4. Town Law 4267-b(3)(1b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in-the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Managemeni Code, 5. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created since the applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. However,to the extent that a seasonal structure such as this one periodically requires some degree of reconstruction and/or alterations to continue the safe use of the structure,the need for variance relief is not self-created, but is created by Zoning Code that now prohibits an existing use and activities that at one time were not prohibited. Page 3,August 20,2020 #7408,Petsky STM No. 1000-53-5-12 6 6. Town Law X267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of renovations and additions while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and'welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Lehnert, seconded by Member Dantes, and duly carried,to GRANT the variance as applied for, and shown on a Site Plan of Breezy Shores, dated November 1, 2019 and Architectural Drawings,dated January 3,2020,prepared by Robert I.Brown,Architect. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1, The cottage use will continue in its current status as an unheated seasonally occupied dwelling. 2. No other alterations or additions may be undertaken without review by the ZBA, except for necessary minor repairs as determined by the Town Building Department. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variances)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan andlor survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses; setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. In the event that an approval is granted subject to conditions, the approval shall not be deemed effective until the required conditions have been met- and failure to comply therewith will render this approval null and void The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Pursuant to Chapter 280-146(B) of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of'Occupancy has not been procured, and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three (3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may, upon written request prior to the date of expiration, grant an extension not to exceed three (3) consecutive one (1)year terms. Vote of the Board: Ayes:Members Weisman(Chairperson)Acampora,Dantes,L'ehnert, and Planamento(5-0), l�P/h-moi c eslie Kanek Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing / aX/2020. ' BOARD MEMBERS of SOU Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson O�� ry®l 53095 Main Road •P.O.Box 1179 ti p Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora � � Office Location: Eric Dantes 0113ac Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. • �@ 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento lfcOU Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov RECEIVED ED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - IvL&g i'3g TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DEC 2 4 201 Tel.(631) 765-1809 a Fax (631) 765.9064 ' 0' FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION Sou hold Town Clerk MEETING OF DECEMBER 20,2018 ZBA FILE:7223 NAME OF APPLICANT: David & Diane Nelson PROPERTY LOCATION: 65490 Route 25, (Breezy Shores Cottage#24) Greenport,NY SCTM No. 1000-53-5-12.6. SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions,without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated August 24, 2018 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued his recommendation dated November 26, 2018. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted, as well as the records available, it is recommended that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject parcel is located in the R-80 Zoning District and contains 82.6 acres. It is improved with three dwellings, a brick building, two garages, 28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds. Access to the property is via Sage Boulevard, which is a private road, and the property is adjacent on the south to Shelter Island Sound. The Breezy Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted in the history of the Town. The multiple cottages on the property are pre-existing non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900's. The cottages previously housed employees of the Sage family brick factory, and after the brickyard closed, they were rented as seasonal cottages. In 2000, a real estate cooperative, Breezy Shores Community Inc. was established, and shares were offered as an ownership interest in the Cooperative. The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage # 24 and is owned by David & Diane Nelson. The cottage, with proposed improvements, is shown on the Survey of Breezy Shores, prepared by Frank Uellendahl, dated June 14,2018. Page 2, December 20,2018 #7223,Nelson SCTM No. 1000-53-5-12.6 BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for a Variance from Article XXIII, Section 280-123 and the Building Inspector's June 25, 2018, Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a building permit to make additions and alterations to an existing seasonal cottage, at; 1)a non-conforming building containing a non-conforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed, structurally altered or moved, unless such building is changed to a conforming use; at: 65490 Route 25, (aka Sage Boulevard, Breezy Shores Cottage 424, Adj. to Shelter Island Sound) Greenport,NY. SCTM#1000-53-5-12.6. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a variance to construct additions and alterations to an existing nonconforming seasonal cottage by adding 13 sq. ft. addition, resulting in 2.4% increase in size, when such changes to a nonconforming structure containing a nonconforming use are not allowed by Town Code. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The file contains a memo submitted by the Board of Breezy Shores Inc., dated June 11, 2018, stating their approval of the applicants proposed cottage renovation. Included in the application packet, the applicant submitted eight prior decisions which granted variances for various cottages in the Breezy Shores Community. These decisions consisted of an interpretation and a use variance issued in 2011 and six decisions for area variances granting the applicants the ability to alter and construct less than 3.1% in increases to the size of their cottages. Email correspondence was received from a neighbor expressing support for the planned renovations. In addition to the proposed improvements, the cottage will be raised in order to comply with FEMA Flood Zone regulations. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on December 6,2018,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. This unique property having been in existence since the early 1900's represents its own neighborhood of 82.6 acres with substantial' buffer of wetlands along the northern boundary of the property. Furthermore, the enclave of cottages is sufficiently removed from other adjacent neighborhood properties so that property owners will not be impacted by the proposal. 2. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The existing seasonal cottage is a pre-existing non- conforming building with a pre-existing non-conforming use. As a consequence of the non-conforming status, any proposed additions and alterations will require relief from the code. 3. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance(s) granted herein granted herein for the alterations and additions is mathematically substantial, representing 100% relief from the code because Section 280-123 prohibits the enlargement of non-conforming buildings with non-conforming uses. However,the proposed addition of 13 square feet to the existing structure represents 2.42 % increase in the size of the pre-existing cottage footprint. The Board in prior decisions related to other Breezy Shore applications involving proposed increases of structure less than 3%, has deemed such increases, to be de minimus in nature. This applicants' proposed increase in structure size is minor and is just squaring off the building that is being lifted to conform to FEMA regulations. 4. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(4). No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. The cottage will be also Page 3,December 20,2018 #7223,Nelson SCTM No. 1000-53-5-12.6 be raised to comply with current FEMA requirements to provide additional protection from potential storm surge flooding'. 5. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created since the applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the.parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. However,to the extent that a seasonal structure such as this that periodically requires some degree of reconstruction and/or alterations in order to continue the safe use of the structure, the need for variance relief is not self-created, but is created by Zoning Code that now prohibits an existing use and activities that at one time were not prohibited. 6. Town Law 4267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of renovations and an addition to the cottage while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered_by Member Lehnert, seconded by Member Dantes, and duly carried,to GIANT the variance as applied for, and shown on the site plan of Breezy Shores, Cottage 424, prepared by Frank Uellendahl,R.A.dated June 14,2018. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWINGCONDITIONS: 1. The cottage use will continue in its current status as an unheated seasonally occupied dwelling. 2. No other alterations or additions may be undertaken without review by the ZBA, except for necessary minor repairs as determined by the Town Building Department. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. In the event that this is an approval subject to conditions, the approval shall not be deemed effective until such time that the foregoing conditions are met; and failure to comply therewith will render this approval null and void. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Pursuant to Chapter 250-146(B) of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured, and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three Page 4,December 20,2018 #7223,Nelson SUM No. 1000-53-5-12.6 (3) years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may, upon written request prior to the date of expiration, grant an extension not to exceed three(3) consecutive one (1) year terms. Vote of the Board: Ayes:Members Dantes (Vice Chair), Acampora,Planamento and Lehnert. This Resolution was duly adopted(4-0). (Chairperson Weisman absent) LvcL� Eric L. Dantes Vice Chair Approved for filing �2- / /2018 BOARD MEMBERS OF sour Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �� yp 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantes l0 Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G @ Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning yo 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider �'��'ou�uT't,�, + Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown-northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMIlVATION MEETING OF APRIL 21,2016 ZBA FILE: 6934 NAME OF APPLICANT:Breezy Shores Community,Inc.(Jason Schmidt) PROPERTY LOCATION:#8 Breezy Shores Community,Inc.,65490 Main Road,aka Sage Blvd. Greenport;NY SCTM01000-53-5-12.6 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property-under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions,without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was'referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 1414 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated Feb. 19,2016 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268,Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated March 8, 2016.Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is the LWRP CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTSIDESCRIPTION:_ Subject parcel is located in the R-80 zone and contains 82.6 acres. It is improved with three dwellings, a brick building, two garages, 28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds. Access to the property is via Sage Boulevard,which is a private road, and the property is adjacent on the south to Shelter Island Sound.The Breezy Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted-in the history of the Town.The multiple cottages on the property are a pre-existing non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900s.The cottages previously housed employees of the Sage family brick factory,and after the brickyard closed, they were rented as seasonal cottages. In 2000 a real estate cooperative, Breezy Shores Community, Inc.was established,and shares were offered as ari ownership interest in the Cooperative.The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage #8 and is owned by Jason Schmidt. The cottage, with proposed improvements,is shown on the survey of Breezy Shores prepared by Frank Uellendahl,dated Feb.02,2016. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article =II Code Section 280123 and the Building Inspector's February 3, 2016 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing seasonal cottage at; 1) a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed, structurally altered or moved, unless such building is changed to a conforming use. 1 J' Page 2 of 3—April 21,2016 ZBA#6934—Breezy Shores Community(Schmidt) SCrM#1000-53-5-12.6 RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a variance to construct additions and alterations to an existing nonconforming seasonal cottage when such changes to a nonconforming structure containing a nonconforming use are not allowed by Code. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The file contains a memo submitted by the Board of Breezy Shores,Inc., dated Jan.29,2016,stating their approval of the applicant's proposed cottage renovation. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on April 7,2016,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law&267-b(3)(b)(1).Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable changd in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties.This unique property represents its own neighborhood of 82.6 acres. It contains a substantial buffer of wetlands along the northerly boundary of the property,and the enclave of cottages is sufficiently removed from other adjacent neighborhood properties so that adjacent property owners will not be adversely impacted by the proposed structural improvements to seasonally occupied Cottage#8. 2. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(2).The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The existing seasonal cottage is a pre-existing non- conforming building with a pre-existing non-conforming use. As a consequence of the non-conforming status,any proposed additions and alterations will require relief from the code. 3. Town Law&267-b(3)(b)(3).The variance granted herein for the alterations and additions is mathematically substantial,representing 100%relief from-the code because Section 280-123 prohibits the enlargement of non- conforming buildings with non-conforming uses. However,the proposed addition of 21 square feet to the existing structure represents a 2.98%increase in the size of the pre-existing cottage footprint.This Board,in prior decisions related to other Breezy Shores applications involving proposed increases of structure sizes of less than 3%,has deemed that such increases,particularly when necessary to make interior bathroom or bedroom space more Code conforming,to be de minimus in nature.This applicant's proposed increase in structure size is necessary in order to bring the existing bedrooms up to code required legal size. 4. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code.The cottage will be raised 12-14 inches to provide additional protection from potential stone surge flooding. 5. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(5).The difficulty has been self-created since the applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase.However,to the extent that a seasonal structure such as this one periodically requires some degree of reconstruction and/or alterations to continue the safe use of the structure,the need for variance relief is not self-created,but is created by zoning Code that now prohibits an existing use and activities that at one time were not prohibited. 6.Town Law &267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of renovations,while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community" � T Page 3 of 3—April 21,2016 ZBA#6934—Breezy Shores Community(Schmidt) SCrM#1000.53-5-12.6 I RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Horning, seconded by Member Weisman (Chairperson), and duly carried,to GRANT the variance as applied for, and shown on the survey of Breezy Shores prepared by Frank Uellendahl,dated Feb.02,2016.Subject to the following conditions; CONDITIONS: 1.The cottage use will continue in its current status as an unheated seasonally occupied dwelling. 2.No other alterations or additions may be undertaken without review by the ZBA,except for necessary minor repairs as determined by the Town Building Department. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy,when issued Any deviation from the survey,site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board ofAppeals. Any deviation from the variances)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings,site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone arty current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Pursuant to Chapter 280-146(B) of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured, and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three (3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may,upon written request prior to the date of expiration,grant an extension not to exceed three(3) consecutive one (1)year terms. Vote of the Board.- Ayes. Members Weisman (Chairperson), Schneider, Dantes, Horning, Goehringer. This Resolution was duly adopted(5-0). Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson Approved for filing /,Z�2016 BOARD MEMBERS �,®f so Ur Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ® ���® 53095 Main Road a P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantes Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer ego Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning ® �� 54375 Main Road(at Young Avenue) Kenneth Schneider ��G'jj( �� Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.nortlLfork.net ZONI1.O BOARD OF APPEALS RECEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 JU 2 3 2015 "UtholdWig. Clem FIIOIDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DBTER*NM ATION NAETING OF DUNE 18,2015 ZBA FILE#6862 NAME OF APPLICANT:BREEZY SHORES COMMUNITY,WC.(MARTHA BROOKS) PROPERTY LOCATION: Cottage #4 Breezy Shores Community, Inc., 65490 Main Road (aka State Route 25)aka.Sage Blvd.(adj.to Shelter Island Sound)Greenport,NY.SCT_M#1000-53-5-12.6 SEORA DETERM[ TATION:The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the propdrty under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions,without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated June 2, 2015 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Locdl Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LVW Coordinator issued a recommendation dated May 26, 2015. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department,as well as the records available to us,it is our recommendation that the proposed action is .CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION. Subject parcel is located in the R-80 zone and contains 82.6 acres.It is improved with three dwellings,a brick building,two garages,28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds.The Breezy Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted in the history of the Town.The access to the property is via a private road(Sage Boulevard)and the property is adjacent on the south to Shelter Island Sound.The multiple cottages on the property are a pre-existing non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900s.The cottages housed employees of the Sage"family brick factory and have been rented as seasonal cottages.In 2000,the community established a real estate cooperative,Breezy Shores Community,Inc.,and shares were offered as an ownership interest in the Cooperative.The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage no.4 and is owned by Martha Brooks.All as shown on the survey prepared by Howard Young,L.S.,dated January 9,2013 and a site plan by Robert I Brown,Architect,dated August 18,2014. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variance(s) from Article XXIlI Code Section 280-123,Article XXII Section 280-116(B)and the Building Inspector's January 12,2015 Notice of Disapproval based on 1 e 1 Page 2 of 3—June 18,2015 ZBA File#6862—Breezy Shores(Brooks) SCiM#1000-53-5-12.6 an application for building permit to add and alter,to include raising an existing seasonal cottage at; 1)a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged,reconstructed, structurally altered or moved, unless such building is changed to a conforming use, '2) less than the code required bullchead setback of 75 feet i i RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to make alterations to a seasonal cottage with a ' nonconforming use where the code permits no enlargement, reconstruction or alterations unless the building is changed to a conforming use, and a non-conforming bulkhead setback of 59.5 feet:where the code requires a minimum of 75 feet. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The Board received a letter dated July 29,2014 from the Secretary of the Breezy Shores Community Corporation indicating approval of the applicant's plans. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on June 4,2015 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1, Town Lazy&267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties.This unique property represents its own neighborhood of 82.6 acres with substantial wetlands and is far removed from adjacent properties. Thus,no adjacent property owner will be adversely impacted by the proposal.These 28 seasonal cottages on the subject property have been in existence since the early 1900's when they were built for occupancy by workers in the Sage brick factory.In thel940's,when operation of the brick factory slowed cottages were rented to summer guests.Each of the adjacent waterfront units are similarly located from the bulkhead and are of similar size. 2. Town Law&267-b(3)(b)(2),The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than area variances. The existing seasonal cottage is a pre- existing non-conforming building with a pre-existing non-conforming use with a pre-existing non- conforming bulkhead setback of 59.4 feet. Therefore, any proposed additions and alterations will require relief from the code. 3. Town Law 5267-b(Q(b)(3). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial. The variance for Section 280-.123 represents 100%relief because the code prohibits the enlargement of non- conforming buildings with non-conforming uses. However,the proposed addition of a door with a 4'x 4' landing on the west side of the cottage and a sliding glass door with a 4' by 8'landing on the East side of i the cottage will add 2,22%to the existing footprint. This is in line with de minimus additions the ZBA i has granted in previous decisions. In the context of the entire community,the variance is not substantial. The variance for the bulkhead setback is substantial representing 21%relief from the code. However,the nonconforming cottages have existed in their current locations since the 1940's with each waterfront cottage unit having a similar non-conforming bulkhead setback.The location of the proposed structure shall remain the same. 4. Town Law 4267-b(3)(bl(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. L Page 3 of 3—June 18,2015 ZBA R106862—Breezy Shores(Brooks) SM91#1000-53-5-12.6 5. Town Law 4267-15(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive I knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase.However,to the extent that a structure ultimately and unavoidably requires some reconstruction and/or alterations to allow for reasonable improvements to-continue the safe use of the structure,the need for variance relief is not self-created but created by the zoning code that now prohibits activities which at one time were not prohibited. 6. Town Law 4267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of additions and alterations to the seasonal cottage, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the Icommunity. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD:In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Dantes, seconded by Member Goehringer,and duly carried,to GRA1�1T. the variances as applied for, and shown on the Architectural plans by Robert I. Brown, Architect labeled site plan, foundation plan, existing floor plan, road side, west, water side, and east ; elevations,and section for phases I and H and dated March 3,2015. Any deviation from the survey,site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or apossible denial by the Building Department of a building permit,and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. An deviation from the variances)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Pursuant to Chapter 280-146(B) of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become nul]and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured,and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three (3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may,upon written request prior to the date of expiration,grant an extension not to exceed three(3)consecutive one(1) year terms. Vote of the Board: Ayes:Members Weisman(Chairperson),Schneider,Homing,Dante,Goehringer.This Resolution was duly adopte (5-0). Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson Approved for filing /2015 BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson If SoUlyOl 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 Eric Dantes 4 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Office 1,0cation: Gerard P.Goehringer Q Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning ® O y 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider O1�C0 j Southold,NY 11971 i http://southoldtown.northfork net RECEIV D ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD A Z 5 201 Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 Q Sou old Town Clerk FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERNNUNATION TWEETING OF APRIL 17,2014 ZBA FILE:6704 NAME OF APPLICANT:Breezy Shores Community Inc.Cottage 47(Steven Flotteron)CTM 1000-53-5-12.6 PROPERTY LOCATION:65490 Main Road,(aka Sage Blvd.)(adj.to Shelter Island Sound),Southold,NY SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions,without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated November 15, 2013 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268,Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated Nov. 26, 2013. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject parcel is located in the R-80 zone and contains 82.6 acres, It is improved with three dwellings, a brick building, two garages, 28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds. The Breezy Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted in the history of the Town.The access to the property is via a private road (Sage Boulevard) and the property is adjacent on the south to Shelter island Sound The multiple cottages on the property are a pre-existing non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900s.The cottages previously housed employees of the Sage family brick factory,and after the brickyard closed, they were rented as seasonal cottages. In 2000 a real estate cooperative, Breezy Shores Community,Inc.,was established,and shares were offered as an ownership interest in the Cooperative.The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage no.7 and is owned by Steven Flotteron.The cottage,with proposed improvements, is shown on the survey of Breezy Shores prepared by Howard Young, L.S., dated Dec. 30, 2010, and the site plan drawings by Robert I.Brown Architect,P.C.,dated March 24,2014. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XXIII Code Section 280-123, Article XXII Section 280-116(B) and the Building Inspector's October 31, 2013 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for additions and alterations to an existing seasonal cottage at; 1) a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed, structurally altered or moved, unless such building is changed to a conforming use,2)less than the code required bulkhead setback of 75 feet. I r Pane 2 of-April 17,20 14 ZBA46704-Breezy Shores Comm.,Inc SCTM#1000-53-5-12.6 RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a variance to construct additions and alterations to an existing nonconforming seasonal cottage when such changes to a nonconforming structure containing a nonconforming use are not allowed by Code,and a second variance for a 72 feet setback from the bulkhead,where 75 feet is required. i AMENDED APPLICATION: During the Dec. 5, 2013 hearing, the applicant was asked to bring the plan into more conformity with the code. The applicant on March 26, 2014 submitted a revised plan that reduced the size of the proposed non-conforming additions and alteration, bringing the plan into more conformity with the codes.- Several letters of support were received. The Board of the Breezy Shores Community is in support of the proposal. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION• The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on December 5,2013,on February 6,2014, and on April 3,2014,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law 4267-b(3Nb)(1).' Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties.This unique property represents its own neighborhood of 82.6 acres with substantial wetlands,and it is sufficiently removed from other adjacent neighborhood properties so that no adjacent property owners will be adversely impacted by the proposed structural improvements to seasonally occupied Cottage 47. The additions will be limited to a 2.8%increase in the size of the existing structure. All 28 seasonal cottages on the subject property have been in existence since the early 1900's,when they were constructed for workers in the Sage brick factory.In thel940's,when operation of the brick factory slowed and then stopped, the cottages were rented to seasonal guests.The adjacent waterfront cottages have similar,pre-existing,non- conforming bulkhead setbacks. 2. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(2).The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The existing seasonal cottage is a pre-existing non- conforming building with a pre-existing non-conforming use.The cottage also has a pre-existing non-conforming bulkhead setback of 72 feet. As a consequence of the non-conforming features any proposed additions and alterations will require relief from the code. 3. Town Law&267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance granted herein for the alterations and additions is mathematically substantial,representing 100%relief from the code because Section 280-123 prohibits the enlargement of non- conforming buildings with non-conforming uses. However,the proposed addition of 20.6 square feet to the existing structure represents a 2.8%increase in the size of the pre-existing cottage footprint.This Board,in prior decisions related to other Breezy Shores applications involving proposed increases of structure sizes of less than 3%, has deemed such increases,particularly when necessary to make interior bathroom or bedroom space more Code conforming,to be de minimus in nature.This applicant's proposed increase in structure size is necessary in order to bring the existing bedrooms up to code required legal size. The variance granted herein for relief from Section 280-116(B)for a 72 feet bulkhead setback where 75 feet is required by Code is not mathematically substantial,representing approximately 4%relief from the code. 4. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(41 No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. 5. Town Law 6267-140)(b)(5).The difficulty has been self-created since the applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase.However,to the extent that a seasonal structure such as this one periodically requires some degree of reconstruction and/or alterations to continue the safe use of the structure,the need for variance relief is not self-created. Page 3 of 3-April 17,2014 ZBA96704-Breezy Shores Comm.,Inc. SM,1# 6. Town Law 4267-b.,Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of additions and alterations to the seasonal cottage, including Code compliant bedroom dimensions, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Homing, seconded by Member Weisman (Chairperson),and duly carried,to GRANT, the variances as applied for, and shown on the survey of Breezy Shores prepared by Howard Young, L.S., dated Dec. 30, 2010, and the drawings, titled Site Plan (Flotteron) dated 10/30/2013, Ground Floor dated Mar.24,2014 and Flotteron Residence dated Mar.24,2014 all prepared by Robert I.Brown Architect,P.C., subject to the following conditions; CONDITIONS: 1.The cottage use will continue in its current status as an unheated seasonally occupied dwelling. 2.No other alterations or additions may be undertaken without review by the ZBA,except for necessary minor repairs as determined by the Town Building Department. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy,when issued. Any deviation from the survey,site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board ofAppeals. Any deviation from the variances)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board. Ayes:Members Weisman (Chairperson),Schneider,Horning, Goehringer, Dances. This Resolution was duly adopted(5-0). 1 Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson Approved for filing J�/—/q, /2014 BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chai,person �O��o����Tit/�l 53095 Main Road e P.O.Box 1179 Eric Dantes Southold,NY 11971-0959 Gerard P.Goehringer Office Location: George Horning Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank ® 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider Cow,�� Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.no.rthfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809 a Fax(631)765-9064 .BINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION METING OF XULY 25,2013 ZBA FILE#6661 NAME OF APPLICANT:Breezy Shores Community,Inc. (Graham Willoughby) PROPERTY LOCATION: 65490 Main Road Cottage #13 (aka State Rout25and Sage Blvd.)Island Sound), Greenport,NY ) (adj. to Shelter SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in application and determines that this review falls under the Type H category othe States List of A f State's this further steps under SEQRA. ns, without SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of PlanningSuffolk reply dated May 15, 2013 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determ ol as there appears to be no significant county-wide of inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for-review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfiont Revitalization Program L Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated June 27, 2013. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as + available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy e records standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject,parcel is located in the R-80 zone and contains 82.6 acres.It is improved with three dwellings,a brick building,two garages,28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds.The Breezy Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted in the history of the Town.The access to the property is via a private road(Sage Boulevard)and the property is adjacent on the south to Shelter Island Sound. The multiple cottages on the property are a pre-existing non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900s. The cottages housed employees of the Sage family brick factory and have been rented as seasonal cottages.In 2000, a real estate cooperative,Breezy Shores Community,Inc.,was established by the community and shares were offered as an ownership interest in the Cooperative.The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage no. 13 and is owned by Graham Willoughby as shown the survey prepared by Howard Young,L.S., entitled Survey for Cottage 3Br ezShores"t Gr eand Emily illiams. lnport,dated n Jan.09, 2013. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variance from Article XXIII Code Section 280-123A and the Building Inspector's March 7,2013, amended May 2, 2013 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for additions and alterations to an existing seasonal cottage at; 1)a nonconforming building containing a f Page 2 of 3-July 25,2013 ZBA#6661—Breezy Shores Community,Inc.(Willoughby) SCfM#1000-53-5-12.6 nonconforming use shall not be enlarged,reconstructed,structurally altered or moved,unless such building is changed to a conforming use. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a variance to construct a':27 square foot addition for the reconstruction and alterations of the bathroom and mudroom,as shown on the architectural drawings,A-1,A-2,A- 3 and A-4,prepared by Frank Uellendahl,R.A.,dated 04/30/2013. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on July 11,2013,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law 5267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties. This unique property represents its own neighborhood of 82.6 acres with substantial wetlands and is far removed from adjacent properties.Thus,no adjacent property owner will be adversely impacted by the proposal. These 28 seasonal cottages on the subject property have been in existence since the early 1900's when they were built for occupancy by workers in the Sage brick factory. In the 940's,when operation of the brick factory slowed cottages were rented to summer guests.Each of the adjacent waterfront units are similarly located from the bulkhead and are of similar size. 2. Town Law§267-bQ(h)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue,other than an area variance.The existing seasonal cottage is a non-conforming building with a non-conforming use which,as per the code,requires a variance from Section 280-123 in order to permit any alterations and additions to the seasonal cottage. 3. Town Law 5267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance granted herein for relief from Section 280-123 is mathematically substantial, representing 100% relief from the code. However,the proposed addition of 27 square feet is minimal, representing a 3%expansion of the pre-existing cottage foot print and the proposed alterations will be in kind. 4. Town Law 5267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in-the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. 5. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. However, to the extent that a structure ultimately and unavoidably requires some reconstruction and/or alterations to allow for reasonable improvements to continue the safe use of the structure, the need for variance relief is not self-created but created by the zoning code that now prohibits activities which at one time were not prohibited 6.Town Law 5267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of an addition and alterations to the seasonal cottage,while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Schneider, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried,to GRANT,the variance as applied for,and shown on the architectural drawings,A-1 site plan dated 04/30/2013, last revised 7/11/13, A-2, A-3 and A-4, prepared by Frank Uellendahl, R.A., dated 04/30/2013. Subject to the following conditions; Page 3 of 3-July 25,2013 ZBA#6661—Breezy Shores Community,Inc (Willoughby) SCM#1000-53-5-12-6 CONDITIONS: I.The structure shall be used only as an unheated seasonal cottage. 2.No future alterations or additions on the subject cottage may take place without review by the ZBA, other than necessary minor repairs as determined by the Building Department. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when,issued. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board ofAppeals. Any deviation from the variances)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Weisman (Chairperson), Goehringer,,Schneider, Dantes, Horning. This Resolution was duly adopted(5-0). 4 Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing 71.7,9 !2013 BOARD MEMBERS Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson Ig soSouthold Town Hall 53095 Main Road o P.O.Box 1179 Eric Dantes l0 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Gerard P.Goehringer Office Location: George Homing Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Ban1c R+ @ Ken Schneider 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) l f (i� ! Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOAS OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809®Fax(631)765-9064 FLNDIINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETEPUNE TATION MEETING OF JULY 25,2013 ZBA FILE: 6660 NAME OF APPLICANT:Breezy Shores Community,Inc. (Ido Mizrahy) SCTM 1000-53-5.12.6 PROPERTY LOCATION: 65490 Main Road Cottage #25 (aka State Route 25 and Sage Blvd. ) (adj. to Shelter Island Sound),Greenport,NY SEQRA DETERMINA'rTnrr: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under considera application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State' tion in this further steps under SEQRA, s List of Actions, without SUFFOLK COUNTY ADyIINISTRADIE CODE: This application was referred as required under t County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk CountyDehe Suffolk reply dated May 15, 2013 stating that this application is conside"red a matter for local de ermin issued its appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. n as there LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program L olic Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated June 24, 2013. Based upon the provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Forn submitted J this de ( Wn f Policy available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with L information department as well as the records and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. LWRP policy standards PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject parcel, also known as Breezy Shores, is located in and contains 82.6 acres. It is improved with three dwellings, a brick building the R-80 zone and 20 sheds. The access to the property is via a private road (Sage Boulevard), and the arose t seasonal cottages south to Shelter Island Sound. The Breezy Shores community is a unique roe deeply rooted in the histo ry of the Town. The multiple cottages on the roe Property rtY is adjacent on the property s. are a pre-existing,non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900s.The cottages oriaQinally housed employees of the Sage Tamil factory until it ceased operatio_ns, and subsequently, then were rented as seasonal cottages. In 2000 a cooperative, Breezy Shores Community, Inc., was established b the g y beck ownership interest in the Cooperative. The cottage at issue in this application is knownreal estate Y group and shares were offered as an owned by Ido Mizrahy. This cottage is shown on the survey drawn by Howard W.Young,s Cottage no. 25, and is 04, 2013, and building plans drawn by Frank W. Uellendahl, Registered Architect, sheets Alts 1-3, dated March 2013,with latest revision dated July 11, 2013 to shown all proposed additions, and the proposed increa April in size ze from the building existing footprint. I Page 2 of 3—July 25,2013 26A#6660—Breezy Shores Community,Inc.(MizrAy) SCPM#1000-53-5-12.6 BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variance from Article XXIII Code Section 280-123A and the Building Inspector's March 7, 2013 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for additions and alterations to an existing seasonal cottage at; I) a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged,reconstructed,structurally altered or moved,unless such building is changed to a conforming use. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a variance to renovate the seasonal cottage#25, including a 5.8 sq. ft.new addition for the placement of a water heater,with new Code conforming stepped landings for the entrances, and foundation alterations that will result in a 0.92 increase in the building footprint, and an approximate 16 inch increase in overall building height in order to conform with current building Code relating to interior wall height. AMENDED APPLICATION: During the hearing,the applicant was asked to bring the plan into more conformity with the code. The applicant on July 15,2013 submitted a plan reducing the size of one proposed stepped landing for a double door entry from 6 x3 ft.to 5 x 3 ft.,dimensions that conform to the minimum size required by building code. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Representatives of the Breezy Shores Community expressed support for the Applicant's proposed renovations. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on July 11,2013,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law&267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The building footprint will by expanded by 5.8 sq. ft. from the existing 634 sq.ft.to 639.8 sq. ft. for a total increase in non-conformity of 0.92%. The new stepped landings are the minimum size allowed in order to comply with building code,and are not to be included in the consideration of any overall increase in non-conforming habitable space. The building will remain a single story, seasonally occupied dwelling,in a neighborhood characterized by many similar,seasonally occupied dwellings. 2. Town Law§267-b(3)(b)(2).The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue,other than an area variance. Code defines that this seasonal cottage is a part of a larger non-conforming use of multiple dwellings, all co-located on a single residentially zone parcel. Therefore, any structural enlargements or alterations require the grant of a variance. 3. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance granted herein is not mathematically substantial,representing 0.92% relief from the code,which the Board determines to be de minimus in nature. 4. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The existing building will be temporarily raised in place to facilitate the foundation renovations,and then lowered back onto the foundation. There will be a small increase 0f 0.92%to the existing footprint.The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code and all other applicable building Code. 5, Town Law§267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created since the applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. However,to the extent that a seasonal structure such as this one periodically requires some degree of reconstruction and/or alterations to continue the safe use of the structure,the need for variance relief is not self-created,but is created by zoning Code that now prohibits an existing use and activities that at one time were not prohibited. r Page 3 of 3—July 25,2013 7.BA 96660—Breezy Shores Community.Inc.(Mushy) SCiMP 1000-53-5-12.6 6. Town Law $267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of renovations to a seasonal cottage,while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Homing, seconded by Member Dantes, and duly carried,to 2RANT,the variance/variances as applied for, and shown on the survey drawn by Howard W.Young, sheets 1-3, dated March 04,2013,and building plans drawn by Frank W.Uellendahl,Registered Architect,sheets A-1,A- 2,A-4 dated April 30,2013,and sheet A-3 with latest revision dated July 11,2013 to shown all proposed additions, and the proposed increase in size from the building existing footprint. Subject to the following conditions; CONDITIONS: 1.The cottage use will continue in its current status as an unheated seasonally occupied dwelling. 2.No other alterations or additions may be undertaken without review by the ZBA,except for necessary minor repairs as determined by the Town Building Department. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy,when issued. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings,site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board. Ayes: Members Weisman (Chairperson), Goehringer, Schneider, Dantes, Horning This Resolution was duly adopted(5-0). Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson Approved for filing -9b 12013 BOARD MEfvJBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ���so Southold 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 �® �D Southold,NY 11971-0959 Town 959 Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer TAnnex first Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning ® yo 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider l�c� Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING]BOARD OF APPEALS PE E'VED TOVI/N OF SOUTHOLD � 10:Tel.(631)769-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 7 2013 FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERINATIOt�I u�ho wrA. 1Mqo4�MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28,2013 ZBA FILE:6622 NAME OF APPLICANT:Breezy Shores Community, Inc. (Naomi Mullman)SCTM#1000-53-05-12.6 PROPERTY LOCATION:65490 Main Rd,Cottage#11,(adj.to Shelter Island Sound)Greenport,NY SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions,without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated January 8, 2013 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards.The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated January 8, 2013. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Foran-submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us,it is our recommendation that the proposed action is EXEMPT from Coastal Consistency Review. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject parcel is located in the R-80 zone and contains 82.6 acres.It is unproved with three&vellings,a brick building,two garages,28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds.The Breezy Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted in the history of the Town.The access to the property is via a private road(Sage Boulevard)and the property is adjacent on the south to Shelter Island Sound.The multiple cottages on the property are a pre-existing non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900s.The cottages housed employees of the Sage family brick factory and have been rented as seasonal cottages. In 2000,a real estate cooperative,Breezy Shores Community,Inc.,was established by the community and shares were offered as an ownership interest in the Cooperative.The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage no.11 and is owned by Naomi Mullman.All as shown on the survey prepared by Howard Young,L.S., entitled Survey for Naomi Mullman,Cottage 11,Breezy Shores,dated July 6,2012,revised Aug. 1,2012 for General Amendments,Sheets 1 of 2,and 2 of 2. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article )XIII Code Section 280-123, Article XJQI Section 280-116(B)and the Building Inspector's October 22,2012 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for additions and alterations to a seasonal cottage at; 1)a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed, structurally altered or moved, unless such building is changed to a conforming use, 2) less than the code required bulkhead setback of 75 feet, located at: 911 Breezy Shores Community, Inc., 65490 Main Road (aka State Route 25) aka Sage Blvd. (adj. to Shelter Island Sound) Greenport,NY. i t ' i Page 2 of 3—February 24 2013 ZBA File#6622—Breezy Shores Comm.,Inc.(MAIman) CTM: 1000-53-5-12.6(cottage#11) _RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to construct an addition and alterations to a seasonal cottage with a nonconforming use where the code permits no enlargement, reconstruction or alterations unless the building is changed to a conforming use,and a bulkhead setback of 54.5 feet(as shown on the survey)where the code requires a minimum of 75 feet. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The Board received a letter dated February 1, 2013 from the President of the Breezy Shores Community Corporation indicating approval of the applicant's plans. FNDITGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on February 7,2013 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law§267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties.This unique property represents its own neighborhood of 82.6 acres with substantial wetlands and is far removed from adjacent properties.Thus,no adjacent property owner will be adversely impacted by the proposal.These 28 seasonal cottages on the subject property have been in existence since the early 1900's when they were built for occupancy by workers in the Sage brick factory.In the 1940's,when operation of the brick factory slowed cottages were rented to summer guests.Each of the adjacent waterfront units are similarly located from the bulkhead and are of similar size. 2. Town Law 5267-b(3)(b)(2).The benefit sought by the applicant cannot,be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than area variances. The existing seasonal cottage is a pre-existing non- conforming building with a pre-existing non-conforming use with a pre-existing non-conforming bulkhead setback of 54.5 feet. Therefore, any proposed additions and alterations will require relief from the code. 3. Town Law&267-b(3)(bl( ). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial. Section 280-123 prohibits the enlargement of non-conforming buildings with non-conforming uses. However,the proposed .addition of 20.6 square feet to the existing bathroom is 3.1%of the pre-existing cottage foot print which the Board deems to be de minimus in nature and necessary to bring the existing bathroom up to code with a minimum square footage that is functionally practical.All other proposed alterations will be constructed in place and in kind.The variance granted herein for relief from Section 280-116(B)is mathematically substantial,representing 27%relief from the code.However,in the context of the entire community,the variance is not substantial.The nonconforming cottages have existed in their current locations since the 1940's with each waterfront cottage unit having a similar non-conforming bulkhead setback.The location of the proposed structure shall remain the same. 4. Town Law 4267-b(3l(b)(41 No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. 5. Town Law ti267-b(3)(bl(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase.However,to the extent that a structure ultimately and unavoidably requires some reconstruction and/or alterations to allow for reasonable improvements to continue the safe use of the structure,the need for variance relief is not self-created but created by the zoning code that now prohibits activities which at one time were not prohibited. 6. Town Law§267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of additions and alterations to the seasonal cottage, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. 1 f Page 3 of3—February 28,2013 ZBA File#6622-Breezy Shores Comm,Inc (Wiman) CTM: 1000-53-5-12.6(cottage#I I) RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Schneider, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried,to GRAD' the variances as applied for,and shown on the survey prepared by Howard Young,L.S.,entitled Survey for Naomi Mullman,Cottage 11,Breezy Shores,dated July 6,2012,revised Aug. 1,2012 for General Amendments,Sheets I of 2,and 2 of 2.And the architectural drawings prepared by David Mullman,R.A.,as follows: Sheets A-1 and A-2 dated 8/13/12 last revised 11/12/2012 titled"Site Plan for Proposed Renovation",and "Photo of Existing Cottage",sheet DG-100.00 dated 10/16/12 last revised. 10/25/12,sheets A-101,A-102,A-103 all dated 10/19/12 and last revised 10/25/12 CONDITIONS: 1.The structure shall be used only as an unheated seasonal cottage. 2.No future alterations or additions on the subject cottage may take place without review by the ZBA,other than necessary minor repairs as determined by the Building Department. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy; when issued. Arty deviation from the survey,site plan andlor architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit,and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variances)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use,setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as erre expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of- nonconformity. fnonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes:Members: Weisman.(Chairperson,)Horning,Goehringer,Schneider. This Resolution was duly adopted(4-0). Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson Approved for filing 3 (6— /2013 BOARD MEMBERS , ®r�soSouthold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson U, 53095 Main Road-P-0.Bos 1179 James Dinizio,Jr. Southold,NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Gerard P.Goering, r vs Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning ® �® 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider ���® � t Southold, NY 11971 http-/Isoutholdtown.northfork.net ZONING]BOARD OF APPEALS ECEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �,s Tel.(631)765-1809 0 Fax(631)765-9064 7 o FMINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION - MEETING OF JULY 19,2012 S� old Tawe Clerk ZBA FILE:#6557 NAME OF APPLICANT:Breezy Shores Community,Inc.(Hernan Otano,Cottage#5) PROPERTY LOCATION:65490 Main Road(aka Sage Blvd.)Greenport,NY SCTM# 1000-53-5-12,6 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated November 17,2011 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268,Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued his recommendation dated November 29, 20I1. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject parcel is located in the R-80 zone and contains 82.6 acres. It is improved with three dwellings, a brick building, two garages, 28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds. The Breezy Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted in the history of the Town.The access to the property is via a private road(Sage Boulevard),and the property is adjacent on the south to Shelter Island Sound, as shown on the survey dated January 25,2011. The multiple cottages on the property are a pre-existing non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900s. The cottages housed employees of the Sage family brick factory and have been rented as seasonal cottages. In 2000,a real estate cooperative,Breezy Shores Community Inc., was established by the community and shares were offered as an ownership interest in the cooperative. The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage no.5 and is owned by 14cman Otano. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Use Variance under section §280-13 (A)(1)which permits single family detached dwellings, not to exceed one dwelling per lot and from Article XXIII Town Code §280-123 and the Building Inspector's December I2,2011 Notice of Disapproval, updated March 6, 2012 based on an application for building permit for demolition and construction of a cottage as; 1) a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed, structurally altered or moved unless such building is changed to a conforming use RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a use variance to permit the demolition and reconstruction of an 807 sq.ft.seasonal cottage.The total-807 square feet includes the habitable space and non-habitable porch,but not I C Page 2 of 6—July 14,2012 ZBA File#6557.Otano CTM' 1000-53-5-12 6 the stairs and landing. The need for a use variance is caused by the request to establish an additional use (non- conforming cottage)on a subject property that already has a principal use(dwelling). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The applicant originally applied to the ZBA solely for an area variance for the setback of the cottage to the bulkhead. The bulkhead variance is addressed in ZBA decision#6525. During the initial public hearing on this matter, when questioned on whether the demolition of the structure would cause the structure to lose its pre-existing nonconforming status,the applicant's response was that the structure was not being demolished and that, even it if were, that the structure could be permitted under §280-122. After receiving significant testimony from the applicant's representatives and the Town Building Department,the Board requested that the applicant submit an application for a use variance. As such,the Board will address below the issue of whether the structure was demolished; whether this structure constitutes a nonconforming building with a nonconforming use; whether§280-122 permits the demolition and reconstruction of a pre-existing nonconforming structure;and whether the applicant is entitled to a use variance. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held public hearings on this application on December 1,2011,January 5,2012, March 1,2012 and June 7,2012,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Demolition Based upon the Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Department on December 8,2011 and updated on March 6,2012,the proposed action included the demolition and construction of a cottage. It is important to point out that the Notice of Disapproval was issued after a stop work order had been issued on the property and prior to the work being completed on the structure.The applicant presented the following testimony/evidence to illustrate that the proposed construction did not constitute a complete demolition of the structure: 1. A floor plan with its original application dated 11/10/2011 indicating"rebuilt existing walls"and"new walls" 2. A memorandum,received an December 28,2011 that included a listing of items that remained in the structure and items that were re-built 3. A letter from an Architect,Robert I.Brown dated December 13,2011 stating that"less than 50%of the structure had been demolished" At the public hearing on March 1,2012,the Board addressed each item presented by the applicant. The Board noted that the floor plan submitted dated 11/10/2011 indicated that every single external and internal wall of the structure was either being rebuilt or was new. (March 1,2012 Transcript,pg.6 lines 15-25). Additionally,the Board members and representatives from the Building Department noted that based upon the physical inspection and their experience, it appeared that the applicant took the structure apart piece by piece and reconstructed a major portion of the structure. Both the memorandum and letter from Mr.Brown attested to the work that had been performed up to and until December 10,2011 when the stop work order was issued, but did not account for the additional work that would be required to complete the construction on the structure. Additionally,Mr.Brown's letter did not contain the mathematical support for the calculation,nor did he provide such calculations at or after the public hearing as requested. As such,the statements made therein are simply conclusory with no basis in fact before the Board. On the other hand,and based upon the physical inspection of the structure the Board notes the following items: 1. A new foundation was installed; 2_ New plywood siding was installed; Page 3 of6—July 19,2012 ZBA Fileh6557-Otmo CTM* 1000-53-5-12.6 3. New joists were installed; 4. New strapping was installed; S. A new plate was installed; 6. New plumbing is required; 7. New electric is required; 8. Every window was replaced; 9. Entire porch was replaced; 10. Each wall was replaced; 11. The roof would be replaced; 12. One third of the floor system was replaced. As stated by the Chief Building Inspector at the March 1,2012 hearing(transcript p.24,line 25,p. 25 line 1)"[i]f you have four walls and you take four walls down it's a demolition." It is obvious that this structure was taken apart and demolished,piece by piece,and replaced with an entirely new structure. As such,this Board finds that the amount of demolition and reconstruction that took place and will take place to complete this structure amounts to a full demolition and the loss of any pre-existing nonconforming status that this building maintained prior to the commencement of any construction. Il. Nonconforming Status of the Structure and Interpretation of§280-122 A. Nonconforming Status of the Structure As set forth above,the December 12,2011 Notice of Disapproval(updated March 6,2012)identified this structure as a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use. Pursuant to§280-123 of the Town Zoning Code: A nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed or structurally altered or moved,except as set forth below,unless the use of such building is changed to a conforming use At the January 5,2012 pubic hearing,when asked to explain the language of the Notice of Disapproval,the Building Department Permits Examiner,Patricia Conklin,testified: "I looked at the paperwork. Saw pictures from the Trustees and determined with the site review,determined that it was a nonconforming building.No. 1 because it is a seasonal cottage and its less than 850 square feet. Therefore it fits the category of a nonconforming building.The second part of that nonconforming use is,it's the second structure as a principal building which is on that property. (January 5,2012 transcript,p 88 lines 11-20) We have a second structure after the principal one and have one lot. And then there are subsequent structures,they are not perm itted as of right. So that is why it would be sent to you as a nonconforming use. And then in addition,this is a nonconforming building because it's less than 850 square feet,as defined in the Southold[Town Code]." (January 5,2012 transcript,p. 89 lines 3-12) The applicant presented testimony and case law to this Board to support the argument that the cottage was a nonconforming building with a conforming use that should be considered under§280-122. More specifically,the applicant cited Matter of Dawson v.Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold, 12 A.D.3d 444,785 N.Y.S.2d 84(2nd Dept.2004)as legal precedent for the principle that the cottage was a residential use. In Matter of Dawson the Court considered whether a single accessory cottage to a single principle dwelling was a nonconforming building with a conforming use rather than a nonconforming building with a nonconforming use. The analysis was important in that instance to confirm whether the ZBA properly focused upon whether the use had been abandoned for two years under §280-121 which governs nonconforming uses.The Court concluded Page 4 of 6—July 19,2012 " ZBA M106557-Otano CTM:ION-53-5-12.6 that the cottage was accessory to the principal dwelling and therefore a nonconforming building with a conforming use. As such,the abandonment provisions of the Town code were not applicable and area variances should have been granted. The facts at issue in this instance are clearly distinguishable from the circumstances present in Dawson. Here,the ZBA is not simply dealing with a single family dwelling and a single accessory cottage. While the Court considered the cottage an established accessory use to a principal dwelling,having 28 cottages as an accessory to a residential use is simply not supported by Dawson. Pursuant to§280-13(Axl)each lot in the R-80 zone is allowed to have a one-family detached dwelling, not to exceed one dwelling per lot. The intent of the this section is clearly to limit the number of dwellings and residential uses on a single lot and to reinforce the subdivision regulations set forth in Chapter 240 of the Southold Town Code. This property contains three dwellings and 28 seasonal cottages on a single lot. This is further complicated by the fact that this"cottage"does not meet the definition of a dwelling under§280-4, that"cottages" are not addressed as a permissible use anywhere within the Town Code and the Town does not permit cottages as an accessory to a principle dwelling. As such,this cottage is treated as a nonconforming building with a nonconforming use that requires a use variance. B. Interpretation of§280-122 While it is noted that the ZBA does not have to proceed with this issue because it has determined that a use variance is required,the ZBA will issue a determination on whether§280-122 permits an applicant to demolish and reconstruct a structure,in place and in kind,without the need for further variances,as argued by the applicant. Section 280-122(A)states: Nothing in this article shall be deemed to prevent the remodeling,reconstruction or enlargement of a nonconforming building containing a conforming use, provided that such action does not create any new nonconformance or increase the degree of nonconformance with regard to the regulations pertaining to such buildings. Throughout this proceeding,the applicant has argued that,pursuant to §280-122(A),he was permitted to demolish and reconstruct this structure in place and in kind, in its entirety,without the need for any additional variances. At the public hearing,the ZBA and Building Department provided the applicant with a copy of a memorandum of the ZBA to the Building Department from 2002. (March 1,2012 Transcript,pp 16-21).This memorandum set forth types of"reconstruction"that would not trigger the need for additional variances. Such activities include,but are not limited to:replacement of windows,raising ceiling height without increasing the degree of nonconformity;repair or replacement,in place and in kind,of siding or roofing;or replacement or repair of existing decks,porches or roofs as Iong as there are no new extension or extensive modifications which increase the degree of nonconformity. From the listing in this memo,it is clear that the ZBA has interpreted§280-122 to allow a property owner to make minor repairs and for minor reconstruction. As such,the term"reconstruction"as used in §280-122(A) does not permit the demolition of an entire structure and replacement in kind without obtaining all required variances. II. Use Variance Application: 1. Town Law 6267-b(2)(b)(1). The applicant cannot realize a reasonable return for each and every permitted use under the zoning regulations for the particular district where the property is located, demonstrated by competent financial evidence. The applicant provided ample evidence that it is not able to realize a reasonable return from the property without the ability to reconstruct the cottage. The applicant's form of ownership interest in the property is a severely limiting factor. The Applicant retains a share in a cooperative that is governed through a proprietary lease, which permits residential uses only on the property. Any other use permitted under the Town Code is virtually'impossible on this property given the cooperative ownership. If not permittcd to reconstruct the structure in place and in kind,the applicant's ownership interest has no value and is rendered useless. The applicant i „ Page 5 of 6—July 19,2012 ZBA H016557-Omno CTM. 1000-53-5-11.6 submitted an affidavit regarding the value of the shares in the cooperative,as well as information about comparable sales in the area of the property,as well as information regarding the maintenance and carrying charges on the property. In light of these circumstances,the Board finds that the applicant cannot realize a reasonable return on his property interest. 2. Town Law§267-b(21(b)(2}.The hardship is unique to the property and it does not apply to a substantial portion of the district or neighborhood.As set forth above, this property is unique given its historic context and the pre- exiting nonconforming nature of the entire community. It is one of a limited number of properties in Southold Town that retain multiple seasonal cottage uses and the only property of this size.The grant of a use variance here will not create a precedent that would apply to other lots in the community and the decision will apply only to this property. 3. Town Law§267-b(2)(b)(31. The requested use variance,if granted,will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. With respect to preserving the character of the neighborhood, it is noted that this parcel is a separate enclave that is sectioned off from the surrounding community. It is an 82 acre parcel, with access via a gated private road. Only those persons who live within Breezy Shores have access thereto. The community is seasonal and the residents utilize the structures primarily from April through October. The seasonal structures are strategically located to take advantage of the water views. Additionally,the location of the reconstructed structure is appropriate within the context of this neighborhood,as the adjacent structures are similarly situated,the location of the structure is where it was originally and the size of the structure will remain unchanged. 4. Towns Law Q67-b(Z b)(4I The alleged hardship has not been self-created. The applicant purchased his interest in the Breezy Shores community and the subject seasonal cottage in 2002. This structure had been in existence for many years and the Breezy Shores community required that the applicant make certain repairs to update the structure,which started with replacing the foundation. Upon raising the house,the applicant discovered that the condition of the structure was significantly worse than expected and that major reconstruction was necessary to make it safe and habitable. 5. Town Law zi267-b. Grant of this use variance is the minimum action necessary and adequate to address the unnecessary hardship proven by the applicant, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Weisman (Chairperson), seconded by Member Goehringer,and duly carried,to GRAFT',the use variance as applied for,subject to the following conditions: CONDITIONS: 1. The structure shall be used only as an unheated seasonal cottage. 2. No future alterations/renovation or additions on the subject cottage may take place without review by the ZBA,other than necessary minor repair,as determined by the Building Department. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupant,when issued. Any deviation from the survey,site plan andlor.architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan andlor survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use,setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Pagc 6 of6-July 19,2012 + Z13AFile#6557-Otano CTM. 1000-53-5-126 The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board:(lyes.Members Weisman(Chairperson),Goehringer,Schneider,Horning. Nay:Member Dini=io. This Resolution was duly adopted(4-1). Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson Approved for filing !a t�/2012 BOARD MEMBERS OF soar Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson �d� h'prO 53095 Main Road •P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 James Dinizio,Jr. Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Homing �� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider �'��'oUttY'�,� Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.neL ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD R I cD� , S Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 `l" D 27 FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION%oldIM MEETING OF JULY 19,2012 "erk ZBA FILE: 6525 NAME OF APPLICANT:Breezy Shores Community, Inc. (Hernan Otano, Cottage#5) PROPERTY LOCATION: 65490 Main Road(aka Sage Blvd.) Greenport,NY SCTM41000-53-5-12.6 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type Il category of the State's List of Actions,without further steps under SEQRA, SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated November 17,2011 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated November 29, 2011. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our determination that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject parcel is located in the R-80 zone and contains 82.6 acres. It is improved with three dwellings, a brick building, two garages, 28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds. The Breezy Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted in the history of the Town.The access to the property is via a private road (Sage Boulevard) and the property is adjacent on the south to Shelter Island Sound, as shown on the survey dated January 25, 2011. The multiple cottages on the property are a pre-existing non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900s. The cottages housed employees of the Sage family brick factory and have been rented as seasonal cottages. In 2000, a real estate cooperative, Breezy Shores Community Inc., was established by the community and shares were offered as an ownership interest in the cooperative. The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage no. 5 and is owned by Hernan Otano. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XXIII Code Section 280-123, Article XXII Section 280-116 and the Building Inspector's October 14, 2011, amended October 18, 2011, amended to clarify description of structure dated December 8,2011,Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for demolition and construction of a cottage at; 1) a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed, structurally altered or moved, unless such building is changed to a conforming use, existing cottage is a nonconforming building with a nonconforming use 2) less than the code required bulkhead setback of 75 feet. Page 2 of3—Jule 19,2012 ZBA Ftle#6525-Otano CTM 1000-53-5-12.6 RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to reconstruct a cottage that was demolished and "as built" construction with a nonconforming use where the code permits no enlargement,reconstruction or alterations unless the building is changed to a conforming use, and a bulkhead setback of:50 feet where the code requires 75 feet. AMENDED APPLICATION: During the hearing, the applicant was asked to separate the two variance requests: 1)the nonconformity to be considered under the use variance standards; and 2)the bulkhead setback under the area variance standards, The use variance application was reviewed under Zoning Board file(x'6557. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The applicant was given a building permit to lift the cottage off the foundation and replace the foundation to conform with FEMA requirements. The applicant demolished the cottage without benefit of a building permit. The cottage is part of an incorporated community.In 1985, a prior owner applied to the Zoning Board of Appeals under file 43320 for permission for a 19 lot subdivision of this property; the request was denied. In 1994, the original owner applied to this Board for permission to continue a discontinued use of renting the cottages, the application was deemed inactive and closed since the applicant never provided the additional requested documents. It is also noted that this property does not have 280A approval. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on December 1,2011,January 5,2012, March 1, 2012 and June 7,2012 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law $267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties.This unique property represents its own neighborhood of 82.6 acres with substantial wetlands and is far removed from adjacent properties. Thus, no adjacent property owner will be adversely impacted by the proposal. These 28 seasonal cottages on the subject property have been in existence since the early 1900's when they were built for occupancy by workers in the Sage brick factory. In the 1940's, when operation of the brick factory slowed, cottages were rented to summer guests. Each of the adjacent waterfront units are similarly located from the bulkhead and are of similar size. 2. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(2).The benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. While this Board recognizes the existing proprietary lease on the property that Iimits the applicant with respect to where he can build a replacement cottage structure, given the ample size of the property, it is feasible for the applicant to construct this structure in a conforming location. It is noted that the proprietary lease is a document that can be changed based upon the needs of the community and its owners. Additionally,the proprietary lease cannot take precedent over the Town Zoning Code. 3. Town Law§267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance granted herein is mathematically substantial,representing 33%relief from the code. However, in the context of the entire community the variance is not substantial. The non- conforming cottage units have existed in the current location since the 1940's, with each cottage unit in a similar location. The location and size of the proposed structure shall remain the same. 4. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(4) A variance in this residential community will not have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant has stated that it is not feasible to relocate the cottage due to the extent of the flood zone this parcel is located in. Additionally, the changes made to the foundation have made the structure compliant with FEMA, Finally, the applicant shall be required to conform to the requirements of Chapter 236 of the code regarding storm water runoff. 5 Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the Page 3 or3—July 19,2012 Z➢A Filef/6525-Otano CTM- 1000-53-5-12.6 limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. Additionally, the applicant proceeded with a demolition/construction of this structure without the benefit of a building permit. 6. Town Law V67-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a new seasonal cottage unit while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community, RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Weisman (Chairperson), seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried, to GRANT the variance as applied for,and shown on the architectural drawings labeled site plan,floor plan, and east, west, waterside and entry side elevations, prepared by Fairweather Design Associates dated 11/10/2011 and stamped received by the Board of Appeals on November 10,2011. CONDITIONS: 1. The structure shall be used only as an unheated seasonal cottage 2. No future alterations/renovation or additions on the subject cottage may take place without review by the ZBA,other than necessary minor repairs,as determined by the Building Department. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the survey,site plan andior architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. An), deviation from the variance(s) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving noneonformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Pole of the Board- Ayes Members Weisman(Chairperson), Goehrin,er,Schneider, Horning Nay-ble er Dinizio This Resolution was duly adopted(4-1) Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing 7 /�23 /2012 f ' i .�� �AkEs l��c ,�s� �•7. _l.-��e fiok�---.7y9;r/ oL .,Y�i�•�;5" , ,?�A�Fr L�� - ��x�L�'yf�_, AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WHEN TO USE THIS FORM.• The form must be completed by the applicant for any special use pernit, site plan approval, use variance, or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district QR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Sections 239- m and 239-n of the General Municipal Law. 1)Name of Applicant: 2)Address of Applicant: L R VC , 1joS 51& lGP�4 3)Name of Land Owner(if other than applicant) : 19I( VAL !C tSA ee9 S 4) Address of Land Owner: 2402 t= 19 H4 5 16W Y09e- e AJ Y t000 5)Description of Proposed Project: =Iyooxi -I-P�,c.1Q 6)Location of Property(road and tax map number): &Ge90r" ZY 7)Is the parcel within an agricultural district. 0N KYes If yes, Agricultural District Number 8) Is this parcel actively farmed?,NNo ❑Yes 9) Name and address of any owner(s) 'of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operation(s) located 500 feet of the boundary of the proposed project. (Information may be available through the Town Assessors Office, Town Hall location (765-1937) or from any public computer at the Town Hall locations by viewing the parcel numbers on the Town of Southold Real Property Tax System. Name and Address 1. G44/2!S X)Y /! 2- 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use back side of page if more than six property owners are identified.) The lot nu s ay be obtained, in advance,when requested from either the Office of the Planning Board at 765-1938 r oard of Appeals at 765-1809. Si ature of Applicant Date Note- A.The local board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation.Solicitation will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2.Comments returned to the local board will be taken into consideration as part of the overall review of this application. 3. Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant and/or the clerk of the board to the property owners identified above.The cost for mailing shall be paid by the applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. Failure to pay at such time means the application is not complete and cannot be acted upon by the board. 1-14-09 � M 617.20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Completing Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part I-Project and Sponsor Information e07rA6F, Name of Action or Project: GQj>-= y 4 61Vi2EIS C&LYX4. 11LX-, Project Location(describe,and attach a location m p): Brief Description of Proposed Action: ��Sl�u� r®®,�C ®or �� 57-7 Co77t?&�: e'g:�Ur7 PQo�a�/ •� !�Sl� t�t�t77U1� o/u -/ t9 41 A1JD Gt101V0 (5/Z)8 OF Co rI'�7�l= 7077rlC. FROPOsj=-D /6 2.09010 Name of Appl icant,or Sponsor: Telephone:b� 6 Al/k, (l hFUC= Al 17e%tL, Pig E-Mail: Address: e23 r—t=F=j9(— AI/icl P®t3 316" eg.P—Ei p°�; AlY 1194 cityrno: State:i- Zh 6)4 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that x may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: -F2U6725��5 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? �.UOGe acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? ��p acres 4. Check all land uses tlpt occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑ Urban XRural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ,Residential(suburban) ❑Forest agriculture Aquatic ❑ Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 4 l � 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? V 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: V 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? INYES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: �® 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain INOYES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitaf types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: horeline 11 Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional Wetland ❑Urban ❑Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? NO 0 YES b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(r—Iffand rm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: JO YES n t p A R Y2 Page 2 of 4 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: I AFFIRM JAT HE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLE n h Applicants TI!�' V, l..�l.�.1�.1�J — 9—OR Date: D Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part I and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" r .w{�,: ',t' •; ;?;r s' .1 "11� �k ; �i r- �"'�•' i�'� #%'!.: �ai�_f.,y Y� :ir''_•. tyl,�7�.f „•�� r-'-. '�-.�'. !,tK i+'-i�`C:• t<ir� No,or Moderate s .r.-� r•x�S',rfi±�t --. .,d.•:'' ���•'' a-F��,r,',`,:•�:;5'"��_ d:i�.7.,y..,n.�• s - Small to large 'f� t,; NkC.,."'-`n•r�+v7Y,f�-.�. roi,s ti•ti,3K� _�a'l ,•� •,�"it L,^. T `i9 g; x� t •,.:_ ;k,{r, .,�., °�� "'' impact impact ,,Ss'.�' _;µc _.,'L' �!- -i�...,` � - :, _i4._k'"'.r.-,�1. sv.•..w, 7. 7 5�' 7.rt1.- . --��;;��1}��• ;.yd-'o'� .,:� .... -•a, ,;:!. rt r"'_ {a.,:;u�;�;':3*'�t�(�L�''.. ,,cl`.s`�" �'+s:.�,��m.� � ,.t, may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large t ==_'� 7� •�+;.�lE � impact impact - _ -,`.;.,,:>-�=••:t�?�` 'i.�,'r`rb,�:-fir, �-i• .� •. :- - - - _• - -. --. - ,," �:;:;.:,�i �-�_ ','.,'_.'"�,.�� � may may -.= occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-tern,long-term and cumulative impacts. 5 ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 Board of Zoning Appeals Application AUTHO1tIZATION (Where the Applicant is not the Owner) i/ 0,i(I � � t/) GV Wsiding at g Vdt. �1✓�,�? ✓-�- lll�' Print roe owner's name property n7' ) (Mailin Address) LA do hereby authorize— VCAVI VIE �,°�c`1��. 1 (Agent) to apply for variance(s) on my behalf from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. (Owner's Signature) _?C4_6V C,6k has dn �&Vl,-e SGS ISS (Print Owner's Name) ATA-2Y 12ul2c is CAe6L-/.1vC U47_ &-J�� COVIVTY Sucr��K 5� IV y zv— CAROLINE M MACARTHUR NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No.01 MA6384635 Qualified in Suffolk County My Commission Expires 12-17-2022 I BREEZY SHORES COMMUNITY INC Sage Blvd. Greenport,NY 11944 November 25, 2020 The Board of Directors of Breezy Shores Community Inc. (BSCI) 2020/21, consisting of Martha Brooks President; Mary Dowd, VP; Jennifer Wagner, VP; Diane Nelson, Treasurer; and Lauren Heidenry, Secretary, hereby affirm that we have reviewed the renovation proposal for Valerie and Peter Sakas, cottage 16, which was prepared by: Frank Uellendahl PO Box 316 Greenport,NY 11944 (631)477-8624 frank.uellendahl@gmaii.com and have no objections thereto. Thank you, Diane Nelson, Treasurer, on behalf of the Board of Directors BREEZY SHORES COMMUNITY, INC. P.O. BOX 925 MATTITUCK, NY 11952 a��ob 7 a� v�_���,_.,reez���r �cin ' J APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: �A lC 45 `#��l -1, ( � I LCL r (Last name,first narde,middle initial,unless yo are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit ` Variance Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO If No,sign and date below.If YES,complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer, director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this-_ _ d-ay of`�~" ,203L, Signature li Print Name ( _- 1 f�C�.� �(•�1 t; t SCS �Ct S t ' AGENT/REPRESENTATIV E TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION;_(Check all that appy). Tax grievance Building Permit V Variance Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest. "Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation In which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO If No,sign and date below.If Yes,complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicantlagent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this e ,20 Signature 1� Print Name Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCE'ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes",then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website(southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION �i1 -- --- — --- --- -- -- — ---- --- — — —The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): lj6f-7 �2 45A oz (45e064 Town Board Planning Dept. E Building Dept. X Board of Trustees 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(eba• capital ' construction,planning activity,agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance(e.g.grant, loan,subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license,certification: Nature and extent of action: Location of action: 2r, .0 Site acreage:- ,/"P Present land use: J � 7 � Present zoning classification: 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: t'CitEMP (b) Mailing address: .2 Z eE-7/66 7- 191 ��•��7' AVi5W ��. / 14 y 14::2r©3 (c) Telephone number: Area Code( ) �9,/ ) 7j`7 (d) Application number,if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No 5/ If yes,which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space,makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No �4(Not Applicable-please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes No (Not Applicable—please explain) P ) i I i Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes 0 No (Not Applicable—please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies VON' ot ages S through 16 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes D No Applicable—please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —,Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes No Not Applicable—please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes 0 No (Not Applicable—please explain) V a i I' Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III—Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No (Not Applicable—please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold'from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No (Not Applicable—please explain) PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. n ❑ Yep---1 No M(Not Applicable—please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES a Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LVWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No (Not Applicable—please explain) i Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic ]Estuary and Town wwaters. See LMW Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No WNot Applicable—please explain Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the 'Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No Not Applicable—please explain Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No VNot Applicable—please explain 10/15/2020 Gmad-ZBA APPLICATION-SAKAS#16 r mail Frank Uellendahl <ffrank.uellendahl@grnall.com> ZBA APPLICATION - SAKAS #16 1 message Frank Uellendahl <frank.uellendahl@gmail.com> Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 11:53 AM To: Frank Uellendahl <frank.uellendahl@gmail.com> Sys^''� ;tir•' �' �-,:'� _" ,`�, - .: _s,_�.,���:,.:', �'++43�",,,�;`,�*�", -f.;•,„;�'tr` �rr 'ds�•� ��??u.,, �� a.; a`�.�s,cr;r�y.'''t,'ii.� - <�"•�:^'�'�Yk{,:` 06 PHOTO#1, NORTH DIRECTION -DATE: 10.15.20 ;�'"� _ e_ ,,^,'.,�i. {:,,, Y•.,:;; '� ��,.,, iia.� ,�,`��.. te„ _ a -a��-�+ - � '"" _ `-F';;:'_`a=.,`. ,Fig--� ..,s���`�.%-•`i;��F':�����?.�=3�v'_�,`iFt:� �',^�� `- ,a ,a.a.;W,�%•=�-_ �r'^i�,•r,•.�,w r:;;;a xJ.�.,tiA�:''�.;..,<`y, rr`.5��=:r:5'e�s" �U..�T �\�k., =-..P+'..+ T�."t-ag ,'�.j�.'.:�r'TYr�?�� _i.i.:j�-F...-. Lr`•R9.yR�'x:}ia^'.,{si-L+? = = '�.'-ate` - ....? "�t�;_::-��.•;--�;`::;--��,r���'a±�-��r.���.�-y yrf3,sy`,��r�;:.ri=i�i _ --__ '�Fc �'�a"_'"�i'-s;�i,�' � -.y.�'•._Agar _ _ .•$rye-s rh-� -n�-�"''Y'.iii�•ir.v..F''--� `—.—jl � y•`"�'y '`_z`.,ti '< ,} �ti-� ^t. -tri --i __—_ _---�• ��" ��+•�hT`''' j^"i v rte'^:a•-` ;; ,.1-s,�.i"� �? 'v'�'.(�.� -- - '-- � t 1i7,�i def=n^`g,f _ `�� fir• ��� --— - �a1^�11��i. PHOTO#2, NE DIRECTION -DATE: 10.15,20 https//mail google com/mail/u/0?ik=7d673c7175&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%3Ar-8557907467956536654&simpl=msg-a%3Ar-5818328.. 1/2 10/15/2020 Gmail-ZBA APPLICATION-SAKAS#16 MGmad Frank Uellendahl <rank.ueIIendahl@grna!l.com> ZBA APPLICATION - SAKAS #16 1 message Frank Uellendahl <rank.uellendahl@gmail.com> Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:00 PM To: Frank Uellendahl <frank.uellendahl@gmail.com> 'lzg -3 tip y PHOTO#3, SOUTH DIRECTION -DATE: 10.15.20 ? ',��^^.a1 k ' ,ft: 2'�`^ Y`�,4+*<;"�'a,i»3,`� ` �:j�'�.�.-'��4�;-' �v��}... .L,.�:.±6� t J .. 41 'loon83 E3 Xul'52_1 f!7 �•iryYvX.�T .J'�':c .• Y�' ?K VI �`\L�ia.F J /��/}{�L "+� yR 1:.,(,-.�. J _ �_ t R.M Me UM PHOTO#4, SOUTH DIRECTION -DATE: 10.15.20 scfm Lk IWO - - 12 TOWN OF SOUTH LD PROPERTY RECORD CAR® OWNER STREET (a 514gC) VILLAGE DIST-1 I � OT Corr, '�l<VIF 7r.t• MGtI'n Kaad - ACR. g�, �� REMARKS TYPE OF BLD. I 0 134A 3 derm all 5�e Des PROP. CLASS 1 C �^+�r11� 'e So.qc �t,�rae,�sor� 1 2 0 ' 3 bon e �+ � r �Ce bb LAND � IMP. TOTAL DATE e f�i SCA-ID,bay F)e-v X Z A0 Q h )202 V3s�� 11!3 1 O - e-t�-Mi-t7q - AdWc, js _ o ` eT 70 4P--A qc)3&--r loses FRONTAGE ON WATER HOUSE/LOT 1�lli� j31OW:yogo — - BULKHEAD TOTAL �"/�?/!7- �'` yr�����/cars-'—.' yo/.3/ • _ ._�� •rte", - ,r-•• •• m�. •:yww4�,w iy-Iy��frJ},d?�n�r, -ic:!°�M9r�-' 'I�nc1{�I�.�",`-" '([h','�a�IdWaJFf 'I�&1fSRdspTztd�4+F�?.pan?-asllbiF,ScY+Wrnht rYCp, lip,eas6gf -Y OWNER _ STREET 5 VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT hc� �o� �c �r �n �. `D�5 Inc I-r l •��,cl G Yo(tF' I n FO jv1ER OW�lE13� -� �l�o�r VP�� �e� L N `` E ), ACR. .�C - I I�crl Ir �.1c a l �- ( 1 (Icy Y ^� I c. �-�r �, _t� -f` 17.. rry c Y I P vv 1-Zc�a i t c� S R... b,_�i c-- Ty �I roc �1 W TYPE OF BU-841L FN(�'— l..(('`�< . t'� mac^ •I-f (c__ I- Q l�ci f-1 �, RES. SEAS. VL. FARM COMM. CB. MICS, Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS y r� (X-) ('� r � . �J a � `i O Cf -1 e5l� rj a�j 100 aJ 2 5 f 13. Q }y �'_� -f `T,;! S qf '7 3� � - 1-1 f G°1� Y '•- I r-� I'i"7 � I-i =5�-- c C3, U�• 473889 53 . -5 -12 . 6 OWNER: SHORES INC BREEZY NUMBER# DATE TYPE CO # USE/DESCRIPTION 23440 5/15/96 PERMIT REPAIR COTTAGE #25 - — 23441 5/15/96 PERMIT REPAIR COTTAGE - #7 23442 5/15/96 PERMIT REPAIR COTTAGE #25 23443 5/15/96 PERMIT •• REPAIR CTG #12 Tillable T Woodland 23444 5/15/96 PERMIT REPAIR COTTAGE #4 23623 8/08/96 PERMIT REPAIR EXISTING SEASONAL COTS Meadowland House Plot BULKHEAD 50 Total +H4_+H- Mn ah�aLrtamL�au{ ^�av7+a ava*pSttam+vrhz�+m^.•:rv•::�nwy?'hsH:o4Kygm*iNNRW1041ryAY4S��rv�4JYvWru.nv••„ TOlti N OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD ��_ ✓�7 �) OWNER -- _STREET VILLAGE DIST. _ SUB. — LOT r ACR. REMARKS TYPE OF BLD. 1 — _ �l� C:�.=%,',��'� �•� _ ���,"r•L-!� / C1 fCI��fr J--CJ PROP. CLASS r PTCI `1r SSSr�� �.e��� c �: �zc LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE t// � F`y_.,•�d 2�0j �Qo�— 7 �G •� 61-elr el j-------- 2 16 7o-,)3 S QS ��U���17015- replaces RP-*=IR -p-Lp4t 1��70 7 re-pa c es PB c5z 0 91�)03 ►LI c(-1 c�� ��1i� ����� in+ , (,'�•I I c:..rcL110I)5 on,'-f- c. I ?fcp or k6_+b rim Cl of i p C f 1S lid .1; s i�7 (�'(' �3 d jn r►�� CLlfediatia��,. c' _c. & I`{ DEPTHr co+"fe- MEADOWLAND 5 S bS (3P 3 3�8 oocl Stye- BULKHEAD tye- � ----- BULKHEAD -- - - - - ------ - - ------- 0al0g 9UT 31I1z rc au_tu. c�rllu e1cctyk- -ccq-(,qJa•q �nJ2 . �� TOWN OF SOUTl1-i l_® PF�OPE&�TY RECORD CORD OWNER STREET (DSL+-CC) VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT ACR. REMARKS See TYPE OF BLD. r I s DY= PROP. CLASS Y_ } ,• I' ;,� � if� �r,�-.)� � �r�' I�I? �i )�1 2 0 ,NP 3H 993 - o rn e air f"C 41O�J 4A., / n I� I ,.,,r', LAND IMP TOTAL (DATE ? f�0 3Jr-rev( - IA � G1)410rl CG"It (D, DDD VL, v, C ,r"(►o c) J)�P BUD 7 FRONTAGE ON WATER HOUSE/LOT BULKHEAD TOTAL . ua a F+r y `� ru �uuus OWNER rPI' ,41dflf+F(' ��yp�� nSTftEET4'� a. VIL 4 ' ' b� 1 Sl'Jl# p�Y 1 r _ ...r a .L`:1ar'•tr�dl+uA ,r F .;�, ,I i� ' �, �{ �k5� � '� �'� 1! 1 4�'� y L ,';� !�ry;',rlt:�''I:;,t`��';i!'�;k'•4rrtij�ls�•, '�.. tt,� •,:�, (� ►, J, y,;:; .,,��• � `,� 'f�'� � 1 1/ f f !. J� �" Ir t I,�.', (q 1 r�,f 1`1 y1 I,J .,,5/,� f •p (q 11<iQ �'1 I`a11g1 � li y I,• .f.l 4� /U//,r y //�� �� .!'� ,��{y i�: C:,,,+Ifo. Ilh.�f`� �S�t�,1� � fid ,,,4�,11'+ '�•�l� 1P,(! ,1!7 'I�•r '� `�I''�. i'�� '1.`•+ ,.lf�l�R,1'+'' d'�. ., I i !7�f./l:/� ,_.I• .! .1 VI/ '� " .I, �r,�Y�4. :1.,r ••���. t,. _ +t F ''�"'. `,+ I ' FORMER OWNER N ` AY' E7 r ( r ACR. S TYPE OF BUILDING RES. SEAS. VL. FARM COMM. CB. MISC. Mkt, Value LAND IMP, TOTAL DATE REMARKS o �� •r 1 — �''tl r •i^ ''f ��d �,'f.,'._'f�, L��{ r i�`' r�� l ,L�-fC.r( � 1111 au C1n C 2- AGE BUILDING CONDITION , NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE r, :9 f�� �• e._-7' FARM Acre Value Per Value — Acre C.0- fi) crC, G' f/oo v c illable 1 %e jf/ /9 0 c) 'illable 2 yA) /L � illable 3 (oodland J� vornP land FRONTAGE ON WATER v . 7.6 rushland FRONTAGE ON ROAD ouse Plot DEPTH i - BULKHEAD She, ,Z.fv. F•$OlTr �00 ;1 �5 D 0 ` A)! ,4 L )tal 90C1< , EUMMMM COLOR Mv TRIM -- --- L ---- —_— --- - —� — — ---- ----- ' ' ----� —77 , 7- i� 7 _ % �— + 10. BIdg. J 1 IL/ Foundation Bath Dinette Extension, Basement Floors I<. // f1p 107S �o / n r J �� ✓ - V Extensi6 y� ' Ext. Walls `' L� 6a Interior Finish '-'V 41\' Sc "`r�"'` LR. n LY i ----- -Extension ' %� . Fire Place "\r Heat V DR. Type Roof Rooms 1st Floor BR. Porch <�� I L _ y y �. ✓ 1- f, r� A-� 1 ��J �` recreation Roo Rooms 2nd Floor FIN. B. Porch / L� `"� Dormer Breezeway i L/ x _ 1 0-' / , u „ 0. / 0 Driveway _ Garage v Patio . 'U � /' _ `/%`� ( i n a. 0 U Tota 1 13 .Y / 0 Y'f n�/'/ / • r—fl a, ea Y' d —— . COLOR .' TRIM Ile- 41 i M: Bldg. Extension ! _ Extension • 1 Extension 3. X 1 J - •S;SP, 4a-'7 g d;��. " Foundatlon �'7 3v �.a Both 1' . Dinette -- Porch �:• .• s _ .• ,. . Q 'I^ t ;1� ' a y� : asement �• Floors `� K. Porch a CL ILI XL11J = 7s i i . . Wallsl:o�e.e. � lnterlor Finish u,1 d ;-.5c -,/ LR. Breezeway _ Fire Place Heat DR. Garage X g _ 3y :0 r pe Roof - Rooms 1 st Floor BR. Patio Recreation Room Rooms 2nd Floor FIN. B O B. _ .. Dormer Driveway Total 02 d 41-0 .j o vo '+` !•� .�L.7�tr yYy��•J���• i:.F. Y_•it'�'•�5•�`f'��`J:,• L:��•yiYr 9 a`•5g�•f,,•'-' :J�ry :`.< t ._ e��.a f. �F .�� .y ... - '•i 1 .AS`'4;brtr .•.:�'}� '.rr �:;s:x7� .j'�:tx.�{;i 1wzt'•.trFr-rr^l."111+��•'�.il:t"h{d'�:� '�i':i:.•' *..�.-.Ynh�r•! . . Jit i S• — •:e .r• +'�`�„•a SIA imp MENNEN MIMEMOMM am ON 1 K !: Y � , ■�������s� JMMMMME...®M.M=C Cil Y���4 # knv�+n sed=k,�t •, � '' ON man ME MoMMEEM MEN MENO vM Breezeway lFire Place .. r ;Rooms 2nd Floor F z �!• ' � COLOR• TRIM �� I du ' •') i * D L VA e M. Bldg. C, Extension INN 00 Extension ..t -'A Z'6 0 1,7 Extension ' - '• �L Y r� c .>a �-�✓: .2 � o ) u. 0 8 � �7�Jj�.�c.�._/i S'X ) .44 _ 5 4Ftqundotiona h Porch B t Dinette Basement , , Floors K. Porch •L •e .. �,. •; "' �,,5•�c.: ' Walls a 'c.'a�3� •,�L�:;tura Interior Finish .t���; fa-3 LR. Breezeway_,, .3 �) Fife Place U Heat �/� DR. Garage Type Roof =� Rooms l st Floor BR. Patio Recreation Room Rooms 2nd Floor FIN. B O. B. Dormer Driveway Total i ---------------- ,l'.s,'.`y t� ` "iii i,' - r:' -'".4.3- i f�V =,e:�''+� -•L• i+E'.,.,' -' �'�/,._ J _•:a,•. '�'.., 'e moi.''u..i:.'v:' ':.�.•�':i: .i, . 'r`= .��., _$ - ,tip Y.j J,,'' ^i., •t•;!j' •1.-.<._�•:; '�` .,'�1, —��,, 'r .:. � CWter.`''`: _ , l: r" Sf k. `r ��•Sr°% s:.i,. ,'..' r+c4 �Q•? :Q 1.13,e ��•..,; , .FY~'L. ,Z'?• �Si+r- .d'M: ....,� { ;s.•7,:fir'C."" "'•rn i-=*'r• td., ..7— !-.� kK:: ,e L ! :.r ��.,..� ,},� '3_,etey.�4�. tc J•? -.k�iX•S�S pj' S .:� :•- - t rl:rtiy'� ?:J=r31 L] . v ,yc`� 7` rfF {.7 t�"sY"'A'i, 'T�� sS•' ��53'�••e� � ` ..• _. ��4�, 'd�.,�' �'' �y,J=-E44.•• j7i SSV l F; j;i v..s� 7_•�;, _ +.r�r 1 'r '^,o•J7 ufi` 41��.g } _``i Y;'a ,•- •-:Yl.x rl.,F^'? Z;.� •.7�.eT '+°ry , +�• Jz- s _ -3'K,._'!. `,CC"y, Y'"Pj.•:.l.r.,_ `�9-a.i,�. 5' ly •; J �+..7:�•�t �- sv.�.'.w':3 b '�'; •'Pn l '"'f.'S,..A� L� 4 .. `F J e• .. _ - _ - ';o. U.x: a 1p..-�ti A� � i'.,.3�a..JM ..L'.^..-�.1w,.+iv •:i•• � s � a:�•_ , st` ; "" •_ _..;_, Y•x 1600-5 C, r COLOR !ti";r.�/ TRIM Ile J 14 y C l V7 tr • 1 A Bldg.0 Sx:i y a2�• � .®t 0 0 /i� Y� i Extensions f tr,,�,�•`J,, /J 9 ✓° ,�a �:� ! I Extension / !4 x z 8 A'! / t'f x 15 Z-e C, r - � Extension a t tieeS v �undation pOS' Bath Dinette -- Porch -0P-ORc P gy/ _ 99 semLent,,, U Floors 9t J-1 'PIN 4: K. Porch Ext. Walls. -,!4b alp ;,<, Interior Finish S/aF�i a{;LR. Breezeway',', a4, -f /7 `� o Fire Place 4 Heat /V p DR. Garage ,,J it ��? v *e Roof Rooms 1st Floor BR. - Patio « �, u ®� qecreation Room Rooms 2nd Floor FIN. B i O' B. Dormer Driveway Total ✓ i •, ...1_t^� ��,�..°o'•-iii j; -`'ijk<1.•Sic:ViAt :�Si t„���P.tx��tienX�•v-iI-"u.n,-,.�+;n;Y`i'r,F•�.;-�E(73y Lr ' y: r.�is;",.ra�'`7'f=�. :�ati..��7 fi.+i�:.'.1''°F,.h„1e4J,T.�_;+O.'i,.�'aa''. c;•_sg"�••-'-fiL'ery'jt;.N¢}{•.J� a_•+i`�I]�'`�,g�:,.,. �k•a"rT•�"-.'re'.-ti•tif4'.:• ,.i%y��`:S`Ys.�••.}�'a•�rf,�•y...,t,i1a'• P',�..�pr'rrtt�_Y••�e�g,L��yiw'c°:,i y,,•Y r'• �'. ,,..•''t:'.�3xl!•,•.y•--tf� Pff""''1- i �'�.C7,�:�.ri�! Yti�R �J� 4��'4�Lf'r.``a�:. k�.;•, 2t,.:.�ui.•-;N-n "^�.; '•�, I c ''s� I .. S"'•�- '�c ,.a '" {,,C .! ^ .�-1y, .�> � 1t°a'.a �.n.-• i:.' �'�.�� j...Tx� ./,'!�- ij�1'. "S�' • � •, I MEN N�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 1111■■■ J , NEON ■■■■■■■■■■■■MEN .■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ M� o■■■■■ ■NEN■■ ■■ ■.■ ■�■0 Aon . ,nNEEM � ,�� ■ 1111■■■ _ smalls■ �ri�E�r1.��r■Occ����iw�r�■■sr �i,■■��ai■ l 11LS) 4 t ! L N S 1 a MEN MM�MOM■WON■OMEN ■■■■■� ■� R;.,)_ . ;. .,_� ■■■■■■■.■MEMO■Emom E 1111■ ■ ■ ■E■ ■■■■■■E■■NN■N■■■■■■N■■■�i■■ MEMO■ME■■■.....mom!/R ■ /i■■. . ® ENE N■■■■■M■►.■S ■MA■�■•vr�■p ■ No■■r■i■O■■�N��r�►.r����■ EEfoundation 1111■ MM ON No MEMO Extension Z. r • • _�r Driveway - r, COLOR TRIM G 1 6 ;7 1 M. Bldg5� rO X s t ��a f f y y Extension- •o F-..u ✓� ✓ f Extension :x% Extension i o /p / r ✓; /, ; ����D undation ]y 5 Both Dinette Torch �,f✓ 3 a t.F ; "' Basement Floors K Porch I f w2 I !y� 5. •2 ' ),Ext. Walls ! Interior Flnis 5 N t L LR, _ . -,. Breezeway �D �''c.T1 .�� r / / r Place r DR. Heat Garage /� X!� �, `f z' ✓' q' 4 , ✓ e Roof YP Rooms 1st Floor SR. Patio p°mac% �'r 46. /r, �+ �/ % ; Recreation Room Rooms 2nd Floor FIN, g 1 1 ormer Driveway Total ----------------- �,���%z.•�.•F`�`�,.,�'5...���••—` -.��� `�:�4 .+' ' VS„p('.^k�I.CN�'.r.e `�� �.6L'-iw"�c" 5 :r.;F."-�, '__ "�•��•� • _ ., �� . . d e ., . 'n � _L �� --`'�• .r..�T;;-•�'" '.• u-.,ry:�•a o-"��"e^3-�,.,�`-St�*• tL•s "��';� i•' {: !1•:.s�-•`res.i•F%�'•' r � , � . - '.n.A� _. OI•l.Y '�':�.J►.• !-" i-. •.\!.�s_ '�'._� k.:a. t '• t i., "int :• � ,. R, i �4 a' �1 i � uti��157 iv,,ntectn�star�aeaulru 8 t � •i '� �'/ r r ' ,,.+........w.,,...�ra.e•,�_ '.1�...w�iu."•0•--,y..._ :,F.. 7��I'{'{w��''��•!!•'��]], �' � ��d�6" ����,fl,./V{`.l�.n{,��agrCq+��� �pp�aryq.�.t)Qp�ry yM1 ��r}�p Q�,yye�y T • '' `r r ' 12.. 4 1 I. `�1l{��� M. -M, N !. ,., � `„ `Yrs'{ 6aV�9dv FIr W D V�Y 1YG.ihtu�.I�'r:Y ��'tl y Itll�►�� ��. I Q�' Y \•i.;F:� 'P 1) �.I' .i f .4.•��/il f IJ-�.eY•i.1:i�F�'.�'+�'1•.:.ti , ad 7 OWNER STREET VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT Af PC Q.1 /4 FORMER OWNER N E ACR. `- t � > '�`� '5 S W TYPE O•F BUILDING .ES. SEAS. V -1 VL. FARM COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS 2 // /`•'✓ � 7� � .l�"Aye / � (, c) J e�/,!, , / r y�v/r-/•r e=./•'��- [� V O-L) !-V•CGS' -!fA..•..etJ /h 4y r /D Cr�J ld �W•.N cJ ,t r7�� SO D if !J I 2, 30b S C7 ';I,/'�? �: r i- 42.'T5" ' _/_/ Y �(3(�(mrS t'�C-rl•� - AGE BUILDING CONDITION f3usi,t' \4EW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE 3 ,?C- ,L --r --) la r'�q,� =ARM Acre Value Per Value Bc,sirr� - - -- Acre I 7/4- u; - :,rr, .>,>5 ff3In _ ree.Ir, O,Bo illable FRONTAGE ON WATERi . rte +-1-1. 1tr ; 11-1 ('�*,: I -1d (��.11ril:l H'16 I pf e,7-.A YcC, loodland7 FRONTAGE ON ROAD leodowland DEPTH Ouse Plot BULKHEAD otol DOCK '-At.P- .1�A, 4'1 rtt2........ Z13NAA IR . . ........................ low 1-M.-A A- 0101.44 COLOR TRIM dension <tensio al ,tension 4` 0 Foundation rchBoth Dinette Basement rch Floors 2ezeway Ext. Wa I is Interior Finish LR. Fire Ploce Heat rage DR. tic) Type Roof ROOMS 1st Floor BR. B. Recreation Room Rooms 2nd Floor FIN. B tal 5 �ck Dor er Driveway r c, (- J r 1. 770 VNER VI LLAGE. L STREET'�. DIST. SUB. OT U) PROPOSED ADDITION GUTTERS AND LEADERS TO EXT'G DRYWELLS O O PROPOSED ALTERATIONS 17 SF ADDITfON ® ® m C®��iE d GREENPORT NY 16 BREEZY SHORES r SWD O.S. O.S. SH'D ARCH FRW MLSM 123 cwm AM P.OMX 316 GOWN.Mr 11944 —19 mti631-477 M4 C' ERS C-14 C— ERS 15 m . j o 1 j an 2 CAMERA LOCATION FOR PHOTO VIEW¢2 o LINE OF HAY BALES • AND SILT FENCE EXT'G FOOTPRINT OF COTTAGE 577 SF $ PROPOSED FOOTPRINT C-16 594 SF _ INCREASED COVERAGE 2.95% = 17 SF PROPOSED 17 SF ADDITION . . _ EXISTING STRUCTURES .DS.BOUNDARY. • • • 4 N � o EXISTING BULKHEAD = TIDAL WEiU{N M/17/W0 BEACH ScTM# = 1000-53-05-12.s "` �''� - -_---- TOWN OF SOUTHOLD _ E.c:.• :; � SITE PLAN -- - - SUFFOLK COUMY, NEW YORK E _ SHELTER ISLAND SOUND;; A-1 - SITE PLAN M.NO oZ9 K M 20'-2" 7-7 J J 11-9 J 2'-2",I EH2O410 fA PROPOSED ADDITION W'DH2O410 o SUNROOM BR 1 CLG HGT.: 7'-4^ `i TO CDREEATE OPEENN FLOOR �� WITH RELOCATED KffCHEN IE I MAGE _ FLOOR TO BE LEVELED o GREENPORT NY M DOOR TO BE RREELOCCATED ED counter a ALL NEW WINDOWS O 16 BREEZY SHOPLANKSRES ENCLOSED WOAD COTIAG TO MATCH o 001 ARCHlb RECT ttXx�i G COTTAGE FLOOR , RMK U111.13m SUNROOM x 316 O Cathedral CLG. 123 CORk�n REF. Id �e{to REF. o I DWI o W�D �euRr.xr 119u O O o'e I m:rat-4n 81124 IuI 0 shut--off CR125 12 KITCHEN _ 2ssa �� OWNERS ITO&AEREW DW I ^ Z� 242 usr 19tH SffM CLG HGT.: 7-4 � �10005 i 4-0 p EXI'G WINDOW m st-192-ms O I ——— TO BE CLOSED OFF M I BR 2 1 ' I SC 3 F434 CR125 m I riGJ \N'' < o I ° HWH O built-in. j V W�D _ dr ca�tvvInere ROOF ABOVE �t LG HGT.: T-4° o CR1257 `� "' BR 2 17 SF ADDITIONBR 1 f�EXT'G WALL '' ®NEW WALL r-- WALL REMOVED U BATE 10/12/2020 XqE, 1/4'=P-0' i F FLOOR PLANS OUTDOOR SHOWER SHED OUTDOOR SHOWER SHED . DR.N0 A-2 EXISTING FLOOR PIAN 577 SF PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN 594 SF (Dig PROPOSED ADDITION El ® COTTAGE GREENPORT NY ------------- M 16 BREEZY SHORES ------------- ARCHRECT vi � FRvuc u¢1th6>'1o. i 123 CDM AVFM P 0.193X 316 ( f,W 11944 ❑❑ ld 631-477 6624 92 ❑❑ ----- --------------- OWNERS - -- PETER @ V71m ym 242 EASE 19TH SIFE1 -7117 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION ' a-911276 CEDAR ROOF SHAKES 1.75°x9.25° LVL I AN251 AWNING r -" NEW LOFT DORMER C145 CASEM r1r 2x8 R.R. 0 16° O.C. - , ❑ . ❑ ❑ TW210410 ❑ 125 CR, t L 11 s 1 ---------- ---------- — — --------------- dp11E 10/12/2026 SCU, 3/16'=1'-0' NORTH & EAST PROPOSED EAST ELEVATIONJ� -8° DIA. POURED CONC. FOOTING Q PROPOSED FRONT ELEVRON ELEVATIONS L—� BIGFOOT SYSTEMS: ° SCALE: 3/16 = 1-0 -------- SCALE: 3/16 = 1-0 MG.KW FOOTING FORM BF20, TYP. � (OR: 20 x20 x12° FOOTING) A-3 M.NO a OE� Y PROPOSED ADDITION ® COTTAGE f GREENPORT NY ------------- 16 BREEZY SHORES ------------- Ll IFTT1IAR ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ C F1W1R u WMVi 123 COfMk AVW POW 316 VE- 18so i11 -------- ---__ OWNERS rl SM � 2 242 DM 19M SIRM �2�71is m.9�1� EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION EXISTING WEST ELEVATION '-" I a• � - VEWX SKYLIGHT FCM3434 f C145 CASEMENT DUTCH LAP CEDAR SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING y RAISE PORCH ROOF ?16 ® LlL _11LIF ��❑ --------------- --------- -------------- DE, 10/12/2020 SCU, 3/16'=1'-0' SOUTH & WEST PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION a ELEVATIONS SCALE: 3/16' = I'-0n SCALE 3/16- = 1'-0° 1m Oi� i l� f CA PROPOSED PARTIAL PORCH RECONSTRUCTION ADDMON RED CEDAR SHINGLES TO MATCH EXISTING DEMOLISH EXT'G CEILING, ROOF AND WALL 1.75x9.25" LVL RIDGE BEAM 1/2° CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING AS INDICATED ON FLOOR PLAN RIDGE STRAPS EACH RAFTER PAIR 2x8 ROOF RAFTERS @ 16 O.C. 0 HURRICANE CLIPS EACH RAFTER TO 2X4 WALL STUD 12 ALL NEW WINDOWS, ANDERSEN 400 SERIES, FULL DEVIDED LIGHTS 4"L----- COTTAGE GREENPORT NY 2x8 R.R. @ 16° O.C. +/- 36°x36° SKYLIGHT 16 BREEZY SHORES ABOVE BR 2 CHHECT 1x6 SHIPLAP CEILING FRW 019M AND WALLS C145123 MAL AVRE moi' / P 0.801(316 aENW,W 11444 RL:631-477 6624 HURRICANE CLIPS NERS EACH STUD TO RAFTER PLrEx a vas saes owwo (2) 1.75"x7.5° LVL HEADER i_— ;;5 242DSI19M 100 0003 I ;� tn;4t-592-n7s 20 STUDS ® 16° O.C. i coi WDH2O410 WDH2O410 � � r LIVING RM. DINING RM. 2x8 F.J. TO BE SISTERED �u`jr rti i=,`=�% r t TO EXT'G 2X4 FLOOR JOISTS TO LEVEL PORCH w/ EXT'G FLOOR DALE 10/12/2021 scuE 1/2,=I'-0' EXT'G CMU FOUNDATION s CROSS SECTION CROSS SECTION DE,NO A-5 oQ t�ic°�icna'iuw�im as miaiu®I�m im na�aa¢r0o�c'®immp�i�o°w�w�it ��m ��s�.m n��o°i1��mG�L��Ar�ivaw.v�s mo°m6¢�� �°�a'Ya 00°a�im+��a m�is t4�*�a7.�°M����vm.�ne ae n�MLA°tpu°�.o�rtm mcg ®/ ,00 A to691.'W-75M Pax 69021,X" t L ® .GQIC 1M COVQt , —_ �... Hoard K YMN Land&rMgW F�dddttl ® .WAMt t Lnm =f-'l-O=, P c.'.G Wobcrt,PYOloo mud 0 ® VALVE / — \ Davgtoa G/demo Avfopfwml 6g1+ov R�x .PD69 ttr%NRAWr ® I � I \ pab-t c.Twk�'rvhnoce VGGK PLA .PLOATW9 Dom Yb •MOW ode-CELLAR MW awe .auta ROM charm // ——'` \ `\ ` S Ply C-= .MMEE COMAM•WUP9 R xp&�S •(OWC-MO)LYEVATION J /I/ // / \ . PLO=MVAN=RATE~PAML N0.E6100W154 H WOT VZ=CAL VAUH .HAVP PCO NSVD, 5 CMMFICATION df \ /[9•8 V FAPWa2l K YOUL9,H.Y.&LS W.4W47` � .�•j s +i ••. ' ` �tx \ _ — Gt Tom of Southold "o.�•. „' \ SvPPolk Coavn ,Now York zM� �'®•1.�„ 71 ? TWT HOLM GOwt9 Toe Map w wa IOOO s.n.98 wx 09 Ld P/O 128 • �vr FRM►►smv aPs.n,200 tot NO.1 qM s Laocorvd of laeNlHarle 04MM I raa0{im or cmvlDloHe ante EL aa+s om01W EL M Oa ,SL A pg toren ou Lo WAD DAM 1 ygfto 20 6R" aaaa OAMORMIMLY FILM 0O O 15 00 60 ltf7 dROLtO euLe r.Oo Seale.1°• 9O WATfA ItlM®l C9• ' DimYC6.3010..020$.00H.IDSH O c p4mmew SCT ■.Hail coa POUID ®o STAKE SET A.OrA-%m sa" . m�.�.imn„o.a.oav,m ma o.rveT e•,w.uai a saTm,Taw v Ts.n Tau anID miuTw,..w Daiwa sa«w a rna,msan ucs nv.T,.® v,rne wnos uo ry/aIY[ r ro o<n�,o mow wnonr uo m rm o¢ono,>.wrm vl ...n m.e.em zn w a�ooum s.�suu eo. ev®o�m W a�.vao,..a..al m.v�e.� la¢a BILL Nai uM1Y W M,0604 raR a1,Y M e.PHT a Y,asMFD ue W,0 aDIILW M ila[[MIM'.aC,wamlr4.mICY 4ia uwam oanNTo4 USna)ip[n4 uO ro M.moi v M Ie�O aaaND(4 mlrta;AMa ARf Wf ID.UOpi,.Blf ID N1M1apIK IIE,nY1lUa Otl S®R0.OR 040,1(a)T2,aGTfN 6 an.e(a},STA TNta la1l�ttS PLa(fPl 91GN1 M4tl1 uS IPOY MO oJ4AY•nC6.Wa W OW WiNf➢IIO�aTO¢ 400 Oatrmdor Avow.,RNerfiead,NDN Tor*It901 ` W.691 12'1-25o5 tax.69172i.O144 � admM1wyovngerigtr,e�rKycom_� $ Ouq gouq 9 rl H--d K You g Lod Su veyor Thomota G Wo K,Proteaelonal 6y7no�r Dovglaa E Adam,Rot��Nonal Ergl,aor h § $ Robar!G.Ta•!,Arehttoe! a al A OAa 9 � 5URVEYORS GERTIFIGATION f� ❑�0 0 ,aa,.e� i HOWARD K YG/M5,N.Y.9 L:.NO 47698 + E�00` •o �DOp p• o u 51AVEY POR PL Tk-7—R SAKA�j dn,q � �epAac GOTTA6E,ly"BREF_ZY SHORES° at braennpport,Town oPSouthold PITC—t� 5uP4olk County,New York MCAS GOTTASE II& 9U1LDM5 Fmmrr BURvEY C4=tg Tax Map mb 1000—,-55 a o5 to,P/O 12A MAP PREPARED DEG 12,200 Record of Rovlsbm RECORD OF RZA51ON9 DATE i 51TE MAP ` un SCALE. 90 o IS 80 60 � 1'-400' Scaler t'= 50, JOB NO.7019.0298 DW6.2010_0209_OOIT�OL9_0399� �OP 9 o n MOW-ENT SET M-MONIPENT FOLM A v smcE seT A o STAKE rmw „]SS ` NATCH SEE SEC NO O°5_ . _ - - - -,• , _ -. - ." - #7"d I ' W SEE SEC NO 015 Breezy Shores Comm Inc. 1101 �Q uNE_ (Sakas#16) ° uNrF4, 15'a= FORP NO � --- ---�1/ 1000-53.-5-12.6 ,LL 1103 SEE 9EG t 1 's : 40 mailings to: ]. eN=, a 56.-4-24.1 52.-5-59.5 o. dE COUH eFSHFFOLK '"" Sou,Now 53.-5-9 53.-5-10 To�OF s -0"° mwNOFsou,xan 53.-5-11.2 53.-5-12.8 s°unanR /r 53.-2-29.1 53.-2-28 o-U k ♦ ° b;] ]a�� s ITo on d/r°` 53.-5-12.6 53.-6-46.8 ♦tid iI; ;; `° LWNTYLF 6VFFOLK °22s14 �y �F' ]sA(=) i 53.-6-46.7 53.-4-44.,40 Jia q "• 53.-4-44.35 f B 53.-4-44.11 .° E Rp R < 53.-4-44,10 5 53.-4-44.9 o �d'•o M, *Rg�" i O m �zP r u' 4,e d V = 53.-4-44.8 53.-4-44.7 r- y ] e fes, c 53.-4-44.5 57.-1-39.4 •* Om OLo 3 53.-4-44.6 57.-1-39.2' °�� z�N. 41 0 53.-4-44.4 53.4-44.3 m 1POFs «O $3.-4-44.39 53.-4-44.44 C>`'' '�-' •;r 'V>v> CREEK . "^ 53.-5-8 53.-5-7 •l 5 z J°a 4a 3;��'`,,�• .�> '\P° 53.-5-6 53.-5-5 53.-5-4 -�- ss' e- °' ° � E,s,,s ''y + �, �' °8e a• 53.-5-3 / °' ti °° B sWq �] ;`'e a''a ,`,cvS°S��P° ,a -`,�`d d,:e • 53.-5-2 57.-2-371 52.-5-59.10 57.-2-42.5 57.-2-42.6 57.-1-38.3 r 57.-1-35 57.-1-39.3' y "o°' `' PUG 4 `'. '�°' �.`✓t�m ' r>r°ro�+,P .�•.S� y � 9,- 9� r� \ --� 4-0 4, 4e,J r •v lLzLQL ^terz ( 4N pRY w z�ci x 3&]- , FOR PL NO ' C\ I `5 FOit PCL NO i].jll(e) I Q( SS SEE SEC NO 'EUS ESOBOICe eo �',�• y E-q^�°p�a, - _ 'a_�•,^.`�`'>1 ° °,.� \ ovcs°ue B�{�r°.. s " .. n�"v,•\]N�ss'ffi `' Q '->U- J '�'�a •S % _l�•��._-..^ i . , ,2.4 i/�,•]3 e9,F2=5]S ���1�3 d '\'��. / •�•=O, 4��,ACpR ,�/rBJ' rd,°5i yRn] L a -,I _ a v 2U," \0 ,`` , // f `✓ '✓Q\� R L',�'f ar DR, ,e �r�l4 �' a N. r]°Nc 1 , G