Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFull EAF, Preliminary Review, Lead Agency, Positive Declaration BOARD MEMBERS _ Southold Town Hall so&Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �� �5'p ; 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora - Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank Gerard P.Goehringer 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento �yCOUNT`I Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS l I )a-, I TOWN OF SOUTHOLD � n Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 November 16, 2017 YS�b E C__ NY's-b DI- Andrew IAndrew V. Giambertone, AIA,President N S Dj 1�P Andrew V. Giambertone &Associates, Architects I 62 Elm Street Huntington,NY 11743 RE: RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AS LEAD AGENCY &ADOPTION OF A STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 7 b4L - REVIEW ACT POSITIVE DECLARATION SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION OF THE ENCLAVES, 44 UNIT HOTEL AND RESTAURANT, SCTM NO. 1000-63-3-15 Dear Mr. Giambertone; The Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals adopted the following resolutions at a meeting held on Thursday,November 16, 2017: WHEREAS, the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals has received an application (Case #7046) from Andrew Giambertone and Associates, Architects, on behalf of client and property owner 56655 Main Street LLC c/o Jonathan Tibett for a Special Exception Use Permit for "The Enclaves" 44-unit hotel and 74-seat "sit-down" restaurant, the hotel being a Special Exception Use in the Town's Hamlet Business Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the subject 6.75-acre property is located at 56655 Main Street (NYS Route 25) in the Town of Southold and is identified as Suffolk County Tax Map No: District 1000; Section 63; Block 3; Lot 15; and WHEREAS, the proposed action will also require site plan review and approval from the Southold Planning Department; a sewage discharge permit and potentially a State Pollution Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) General Permit for stormwater discharge from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC); a sewage treatment facility approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS); a public water service connection approval from the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA); electrical 1 Page 2,The Enclaves Hotel &14%staurant ` Declare Lead Agency and issue Positive Declaration service provided by PSEG Long Island; an access/curb cut/work permit from the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT); and consultation with the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) due to the site's potential archaeological sensitivity; and WHEREAS, the Suffolk County Planning Commission (SCPC) has General Municipal Law Section 239-m planning review authority over the project; and WHEREAS, the proposed project has been preliminarily classified as an "Unlisted" action pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and SEQRA Lead Agency coordination is optional for Unlisted actions; and WHEREAS, the Town Zoning Board of Appeals opted to conduct Lead Agency coordination and circulated letters to all involved agencies indicating that the Zoning Board of Appeals is most appropriate agency to lead the environmental review and that it was interested in assuming Lead Agency review status in this matter; and WHEREAS, responses were received from the Suffolk County Division of Planning, NYSDEC Division of Environmental Permits and the Suffolk County Water Authority indicating that they had no objection to the Town Zoning Board of Appeals becoming Lead Agency in this matter and the allotted 30-day Lead Agency coordination time period eventually lapsed and no further correspondence were received, thereby allowing the Zoning Board of Appeals to become Lead Agency; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals and its environmental consultants Nelson, Pope and Voorhis (NP&V) conducted a review of the Special Exception Application, proposed plans, and EAF Part 1 submitted by the Applicant and prepared an EAF Part 2, EAF Part 3, a Part 3 EAF attachment and Determination of Significance; and WHEREAS, based on the environmental review and analysis, the Zoning Board of Appeals has concluded that the proposed action may result in one or more moderate-to-large environmental impacts, and that a "Positive Declaration" pursuant to SEQRA must be adopted and a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared by the Applicant to further evaluate potential environmental impacts and appropriate project mitigations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals, hereby declares itself Lead Agency in the above referenced matter and adopts the annexed SEQRA Positive Declaration. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Applicant is hereby instructed to prepare a Draft Scope for the required EIS per applicable standards and specifications of SEQRA and the content of the EAF Parts 2, 3 and Part 3 attachment, and that the Town file a notice of Positive Declaration with the NYSDEC's Environmental Notice Bulletin. Page 3,The Enclaves Hotel 8:`.-�taurant Declare Lead Agency and issue Positive Declaration If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution,please contact the Zoning Board of Appeals Office. S' cer y, lita-1 - G1"� Leslie Kanes Weisman Chairperson cc: Planning Department Town Attorney 4 Mk BOARD MEMBERS of Soot Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �� yp 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes G Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank Gerard P.Goehringer � 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento l�'CoUf Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 t November 16, 2017 Andrew V. Giambertone, AIA,President Andrew V. Giambertone &Associates, Architects 62 Elm Street Huntington,NY 11743 RE: RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING THE'ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AS LEAD AGENCY &ADOPTION OF A STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT POSITIVE DECLARATION SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION OF THE ENCLAVES, 44 UNIT HOTEL AND RESTAURANT, SCTM NO. 1000-63-3-15 Dear Mr. Giambertone; The Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals adopted the following resolutions at a meeting held on Thursday,November 16, 2017: WHEREAS, the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals has received an application (Case #7046) from Andrew Giambertone and Associates, Architects, on behalf of client and property owner 56655 Main Street LLC c/o Jonathan Tibett for a Special Exception Use Permit for "The Enclaves" 44-unit hotel and 74-seat "sit-down" restaurant, the hotel being a Special Exception Use in the Town's Hamlet Business Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the subject 6.75-acre property is located at 56655 Main Street (NYS Route 25) in the Town of Southold and is identified as Suffolk County Tax Map No: District 1000; Section 63; Block 3; Lot 15; and WHEREAS, the proposed action will also require site plan review and approval from the Southold Planning Department; a sewage discharge permit and potentially a State Pollution Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) General Permit for stormwater discharge from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC); a sewage treatment facility approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS); a public water service connection approval from the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA); electrical Page 2,The Enclaves Hotel & Restaurant Declare Lead Agency and issue Positive Declaration service provided by PSEG Long Island; an access/curb cut/work permit from the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT); and consultation with the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) due to the site's potential archaeological sensitivity; and WHEREAS, the Suffolk County Planning Commission (SCPC) has General Municipal Law Section 239-m planning review authority over the project; and WHEREAS, the proposed project has been preliminarily classified as an "Unlisted" action pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and SEQRA Lead Agency coordination is optional for Unlisted actions; and WHEREAS, the Town Zoning Board of Appeals opted to conduct Lead Agency coordination and circulated letters to all involved agencies indicating that the Zoning Board of Appeals is most appropriate agency to lead the environmental review and that it was interested in assuming Lead Agency review status in this matter; and WHEREAS, responses were received from the Suffolk County Division of Planning, NYSDEC Division of Environmental Permits and the Suffolk County Water Authority indicating that they had no objection to the Town Zoning Board of Appeals becoming Lead Agency in this matter and the allotted 30-day Lead Agency coordination time period eventually lapsed and no further correspondence were received, thereby allowing the Zoning Board of Appeals to become Lead Agency; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals and its environmental consultants Nelson, Pope and Voorhis (NP&V) conducted a review of the Special Exception Application, proposed plans, and EAF Part 1 submitted by the Applicant and prepared an EAF Part 2, EAF Part 3, a Part 3 EAF attachment and Determination of Significance; and WHEREAS, based on the environmental review and analysis, the Zoning Board of Appeals has concluded that the proposed action may result in one or more moderate-to-large environmental impacts, and that a "Positive Declaration" pursuant to SEQRA must be adopted and a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared by the Applicant to further evaluate potential environmental impacts and appropriate project mitigations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals, hereby declares itself Lead Agency in the above referenced matter and adopts the annexed SEQRA Positive Declaration. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Applicant is hereby instructed to prepare a Draft Scope for the required EIS per applicable standards and specifications of SEQRA and the content of the" EAF Parts 2, 3 and Part 3 attachment, and that the Town file a notice of Positive Declaration with the NYSDEC's Environmental Notice Bulletin. • Page 3,The Enclaves Hotel & Restaurant Declare Lead Agency and issue Positive Declaration If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Zoning Board of Appeals Office. S' cer y, ,rall�- Leslie Kanes Weisman Chairperson cc: Planning Department Town Attorney Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1-Project and Setting01T 9 0 Instructions for Completing Part 1 OCT 0 12017 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the aplMgntnr pnrnva�lln ling, are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information;indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor;and,when possible,generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A&B. In Sections C,D&E,'most items contain an initial question that must be answered either"Yes"or"No". If the answer to the initial question is"Yes",complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is"No",proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part lis accurate and complete. A.Project and Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: The Enclaves Project Location(describe,and attach a general location map): 56655 Main Road(Route 25),Southold Brief Description of Proposed Action(include purpose or need): Converting existing single family residence into a restaurant Restaurant will be 3,858sf and will have 74 seat,the addition to the existing building is 519sf Constructing new 2 story hotel with outdoor pool area and required parking. The hotel will consist of 44 rooms room sizes between 500sf&540sf,there are 4 detached cottages which are 594sf each.The sewage disposal system is a formal Sewage Treatment Plant(STP)-less than 10Mg/L og nitrogen which is less than County regulations of 19.There is an existing garage on site which will remain and used for storage. Parking will be provided as follows; for Restaurant 25 spaces plus 2 ADA spaces,for Hotel 88 spaces plus 4 ADA spaces,4 additional spaces for the cottages.New project will completely comply with all zoning regulations and be situated such that no music,entertainment or loudspeaker system will be audible beyond the property lines Developers recognize the need for Hotel space in the area The North Fork is growing in popularity,beyond Riverhead there are limited opportunities for transient stays in particular now that Southold has limited"airbnb"opportunities Evidence of this demand is indicated by recent approvals of some 40 odd hotel rooms in the nearby Hamlet of Greenport Therefore the purpose of the proposed development is to accommodate that need in a discreet location well off Main St. Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone:(631)367-0050 Andrew V Giambertone E-Mail: avg@giambertonearchitects com Address:62 Elm St. City/PO:Huntington State:NY Zip Code:11743 Project Contact(if not same as sponsor;give name and title/role): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: (516)997-6190 56655 Main Road c/o Jonathan Tibett E-Mail: Address: 185 Willow Point Road City/PO: Southold State: NY Zip Code:11971 Page 1 of 13 B.Government Approvals B.Government Approvals,Funding,or Sponsorship. ("Funding"includes grants,loans,tax relief,and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes:Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a.City Council,Town Board, ❑YesmNo or Village Board of Trustees b.City,Town or Village mYes❑No Town of Southold Planning Board June 23,2017 Planning Board or Commission c.City Council,Town or mYes❑No Town of Southold ZBA June 23,2017 Village Zoning Board of Appeals d.Other local agencies ❑YesmNo e.County agencies mYes❑No SCDHS,SCWA November 2017(projected) f.Regional agencies ❑YesmNo g.State agencies mYes❑No NY State Dept.of Transportation,NY DEC November 2017(projected) h.Federal agencies ❑YesmNo t. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area,or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? mYes❑No it. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? m Yes❑No di. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? ❑YesmNo C.Planning and Zoning C.1.Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption,or amendment of a plan, local law,ordinance,rule or regulation be the ❑YesmNo only approval(s)which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • If Yes,complete sections C,F and G. • If No,proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part I C.2.Adopted land use plans. a.Do any municipally-adopted (city,town,village or county)comprehensive land use plan(s)include the site mYes❑No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes,does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action mYes❑No would be located? b.Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district(for example: Greenway ®Yes❑No Brownfield Opportunity Area(BOA);designated State or Federal heritage area;watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes,identify the plan(s): NYS Heritage Areas.Ll North Shore Heritage Area c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, ❑YesmNo or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes,identify the plan(s): Page 2 of 13 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. ®Yes❑No If Yes,what is the zoning classification(s)including any applicable overlay district? HB-Hamlet Business b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ®Yes❑No c.Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? ❑Yes®No If Yes, i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? CA.Existing community services. a.In what school district is the project site located?Southold b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? Southold Town Police c.Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? Southold Fire Department d.What parks serve the project site? Southold Park,Founders Landing Park,Hortons Point,South Harbor,Triangle Park D.Project Details D.I.Proposed and Potential Development a.What is the general nature of the proposed action(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial,recreational;if mixed, include all components)? Commercial(Hamlet Business,as defined by Town of Southold Code) b,a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 6 75 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 5 92 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 6 75 acres c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? ❑Yes®No i If Yes,what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units(e.g.,acres,miles,housing units, square feet)? % Units: d. Is the proposed action a subdivision,or does it include a subdivision? ❑Yes Oio If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision?(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial;if mixed,specify types) ii Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? ❑Yes❑No iii. Number of lots proposed? iv Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum Maximum e.Will proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? ❑Yes®No i. If No,anticipated period of construction: 16 months ii. If Yes: • Total number of phases anticipated • Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) month year • Anticipated completion date of final phase month wear • Generally describe connections or relationships among phases,including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: Page 3 of 13 a I l f.Does the project include new residential uses? ❑Yes®No If Yes,show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family four or more Initial Phase At completion of all phases g.Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction(including expansions)? ®Yes❑No If Yes, i.Total number of structures 5 ii Dimensions(in feet)of largest proposed structure: 33.92 height; 78&72 width; and 270&205 length ffi Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: 61,200 square feet h.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any ®Yes❑No liquids,such as creation of a water supply,reservoir,pond,lake,waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, f. Purpose of the impoundment:Fish Pond ii. If a water impoundment,the principal source of the water: ❑ Ground water❑Surface water streams 00ther specify: Municipal Water iii If other than water,identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. iv Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: 41,546 erillien gallons;surface area: 06 acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: height; length v► Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure(e.g.,earth fill,rock,wood,concrete): Earth.fill,ll,bentonite clay liner D.2. Project Operations a.Does the proposed action include any excavation,mining,or dredging,during construction,operations,or both? ❑Yes®No (Not including general site preparation,grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i.What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? ii How much material(including rock,earth,sediments,etc.)is proposed to be removed from the site? • Volume(specify tons or cubic yards): • Over what duration of time? in Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged,and plans to use,manage or dispose of them. iv Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? ❑Yes❑No If yes,describe. v What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? feet viii Will the excavation require blasting? ❑Yes❑No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: b.Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of,increase or decrease in size of,or encroachment ❑Yes®No into any existing wetland,waterbody,shoreline,beach or adjacent area? If Yes: f. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected(by name,water index number,wetland map number or geographic description): Page 4 of 13 ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland,e.g,excavation,fill,placement of structures,or alteration of channels,banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities,alterations and additions in square feet or acres: iii Will proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? ❑Yes❑No If Yes,describe: iv Will proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: • expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion: • purpose of proposed removal(e.g.beach clearing,invasive species control,boat access): • proposed method of plant removal: • if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used,specify product(s): v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: c.Will the proposed action use,or create a new demand for water? mYes❑No If Yes: i Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: 18.506 gallons/day ii Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? mYes❑No If Yes: • Name of district or service area: Distribution Area 30 • Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? m Yes❑No • Is the project site in the existing district? m Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑YesZ No • Do existing lines serve the project site? m Yes❑No id. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? ❑YesmNO If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: • Source(s)of supply for the district: iv Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? ❑ YesmNo If,Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • Proposed source(s)of supply for new district: v If a public water supply will not be used,describe plans to provide water supply for the project: vi.If water supply will be from wells(public or private),maximum pumping capacity: gallons/minute. d.Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? 91 Yes❑No If Yes: i Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: 8,800 gallons/day n Nature of liquid wastes to be generated(e.g.,sanitary wastewater,industrial;if combination,describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): 8,800 gallons per day composed of sanitary waste. iii Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? ❑Yes®No If Yes: • Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: • Name of district: • Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No • Is the project site in the existing district? ❑Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes❑No Page 5 of 13 • Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? ❑Yes❑No • Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: iv. Will a new wastewater(sewage)treatment district be formed to serve the project site? ❑Yes®No If Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? v If public facilities will not be used,describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water(name and classification if surface discharge,or describe subsurface disposal plans): On-site Biological Engineered Single Sludge Treatment System vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture,recycle or reuse liquid waste: e.Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff,either from new point ®Yes❑No sources(i.e.ditches,pipes,swales,curbs,gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater)or non-point source(i.e.sheet flow)during construction or post construction? If Yes: i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? Square feet or 3 52 acres(impervious surface) Square feet or 6 75 acres(parcel size) ii Describe types of new point sources. iii Where will the stormwater runoff be directed(i.e.on-site stormwater management facility/structures,adjacent properties, groundwater,on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? On-site stormwater management structures,all runoff will be discharged to subsurface leaching pools • If to surface waters,identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: • Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? ❑Yes®No iv. Does proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces,use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? ®Yes❑No f. Does the proposed action include,or will it use on-site,one or more sources of air emissions,including fuel ❑Yes®No combustion,waste incineration,or other processes or operations? If Yes,identify: t.Mobile sources during project operations(e.g.,heavy equipment,fleet or delivery vehicles) it Stationary sources during construction(e.g.,power generation,structural heating,batch plant,crushers) iii. Stationary sources during operations(e.g.,process emissions, large boilers,electric generation) g.Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f(above),require a NY State Air Registration,Air Facility Permit, ❑Yes®No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet ❑Yes❑No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) it In addition to emissions as calculated in the application,the project will generate: • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide(CO2) • Tons/year(short tons)of Nitrous Oxide(N20) • Tons/year(short tons)of Perfluorocarbons(PFCs) ® Tons/year(short tons)of Sulfur Hexafluoride(SF6) • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons(HFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Hazardous Air Pollutants(HAPS) Page 6 of 13 h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane(including,but not limited to,sewage treatment plants, ❑Yes®No landfills,composting facilities)? If Yes: r Estimate methane generation in tons/year(metric): ii.Describe any methane capture,control or elimination measures included in project design(e.g.,combustion to generate heat or electricity,flaring): i.Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes,such as ❑Yes®No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes:Describe operations and nature of emissions(e.g.,diesel exhaust,rock particulates/dust): j.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial ❑Yes®No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: i When is the peak traffic expected(Check all that apply): ❑Morning ❑Evening []Weekend ❑Randomly between hours of to ii. For commercial activities only,projected number of semi-trailer truck trips/day: hi. Parking spaces: Existing Proposed Net increase/decrease iv. Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? ❑Yes❑No v If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads,creation of new roads or change in existing access,describe: vi. Are public/private transportation service(s)or facilities available within %mile of the proposed site? ❑Yes❑No vu Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid,electric ❑Yes❑No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii.Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing ❑Yes❑No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k.Will the proposed action(for commercial or industrial projects only)generate new or additional demand ®Yes❑No for energy? If Yes: i Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: 1,140,552 KWH/YR ii Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project(e.g.,on-site combustion,on-site renewable,via grid/local utility,or other): Grid/Local Utility-PSEG hi. Will the proposed action require a new,or an upgrade to,an existing substation? ❑Yes®No 1.Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i During Construction: ii. During Operations: • Monday-Friday: 0 • Monday-Friday: 24 hrs. • Saturday: 0 0 Saturday: 24 hrs. • Sunday: 0 • Sunday: 24 hrs. • Holidays: 0 • Holidays: 24 hrs. Page 7 of 13 in. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, ®Yes❑No operation,or both? If yes: i Provide details including sources,time of day and duration: Durinq Const possibly,Sam-4pm,after construction limited amount of noise from outdoor pool which is located mid-site will be buffered by the budding to adjacent residential properties located on the west side. To the North are the LIRR tracks to the East an existing boat yard. ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? ❑Yes®No Describe: n. Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? ®Yes❑No If yes: i. Describe source(s),location(s),height of fixture(s),direction/aim,and proximity to nearest occupied structures: Metal Halide, 100W fixtures on 10ft high x 4"square aluminum pole ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? ❑Yes®No Describe: o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? ❑Yes®No If Yes,describe possible sources,potential frequency and duration of odor emissions,and proximity to nearest occupied structures: p.Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum(combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) ❑Yes®No or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: i Product(s)to be stored u. Volume(s) per unit time (e.g.,month,year) iii. Generally describe proposed storage facilities: q.Will the proposed action(commercial,industrial and recreational projects only)use pesticides(i.e.,herbicides, ❑Yes ®No insecticides)during construction or operation? If Yes: i Describe proposed treatment(s): it. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? ❑ Yes ❑No r.Will the proposed action(commercial or industrial projects only)involve or require the management or disposal ® Yes ❑No of solid waste(excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i Describe any solid waste(s)to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: • Construction: 448 tons per 16 months (unit of time) • Operation : 1.8 tons per 1 week (unit of time) ii Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: • Construction: • Operation: iii Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: • Construction:It will be carted off site by carting contractor • Operation: It will be carted off site by carting contractor Page 8 of 13 s.Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? ❑ Yes® No If Yes: i Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site(e.g.,recycling or transfer station,composting, landfill,or other disposal activities): u Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: • Tons/month,if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment,or • Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment iff. If landfill,anticipated site life: years t.Will proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation,treatment,storage,or disposal of hazardous ❑Yes®No waste? If Yes: r Name(s)of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated,handled or managed at facility: ti. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: hi. Specify amount to be handled or generated tons/month iv Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: v Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? ❑Yes®No If Yes:provide name and location of facility: If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: E.Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.I.Land uses on and surrounding the project site a.Existing land uses. i. Check all uses that occur on,adjoining and near the project site. ❑ Urban ❑ Industrial ® Commercial ® Residential(suburban) ❑ Rural(non-farm) ❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other(specify): h. If mix of uses,generally describe: b.Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Current Acreage After Change Covertype Acreage Project Completion (Acres+/-) • Roads,buildings,and other paved or impervious surfaces 0 129 acres 2.87 acres +2.741 acres • Forested o 0 0 • Meadows,grasslands or brushlands(non- 6 621 acres 3 87 acres -2.751 acres agricultural,including abandoned agricultural) • Agricultural 0 0 0 (includes active orchards,field,greenhouse etc.) • Surface water features (lakes,ponds,streams,rivers,etc.) 0 0 0 • Wetlands(freshwater or tidal) 0 0 0 • Non-vegetated(bare rock,earth or fill) 0 0 0 • Other Describe: Page 9 of 13 c.Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? ❑Yes❑✓ No i If Yes:explain: d.Are there any facilities serving children,the elderly,people with disabilities(e.g.,schools,hospitals,licensed ❑Yes®No day care centers,or group homes)within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i Identify Facilities: e.Does the project site contain an existing dam? ❑Yes®No If Yes: i Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: • Dam height: feet • Dam length: feet • Surface area: acres • Volume impounded: gallons OR acre-feet rt. Dam's existing hazard classification: ni Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: f Has the project site ever been used as a municipal,commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, ❑Yes®No or does the project site adjoin property which is now,or was at one time,used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i Has the facility been formally closed? El Yes[] No • If yes,cite sources/documentation: ii Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: iii Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: g.Have hazardous wastes been generated,treated and/or disposed of at the site,or does the project site adjoin ❑Yes®No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat,store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i. Describe waste(s)handled and waste management activities,including approximate time when activities occurred: h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site,or have any ❑Yes® No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site ❑Yes❑No Remediation database? Check all that apply: ❑ Yes—Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Yes—Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Neither database ii If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities,describe control measures: W. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? ®Yes❑No If yes,provide DEC ID number(s):152218 iv If yes to(i),(ii)or(iii)above,describe current status of site(s): NYDEC concluded that a fish and wildlife impact assessment is unnecessary,because there is no receptor population or habitat that would be affected by the chemicals in surface soil See supplied DEC Site Record Please note referenced site is at elevation 6,our proposed site is at elevation 27,unaware of impacts from referenced site as it is south west and down gradient form proposed development Page 10 of 13 v Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? ❑Yes❑No • If yes,DEC site ID number: • Describe the type of institutional control(e.g.,deed restriction or easement): • Describe any use limitations• • Describe any engineering controls: • Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? ❑Yes❑No • Explain: E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a.What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? feet b.Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? ❑YesmNo If Yes,what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? % c.Predominant soil type(s)present on project site: OL(Silts&Silty Clays) 10 % SP(Sands) 90 % d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: 26 9 feet e.Drainage status of project site soils:® Well Drained: 90%of site ® Moderately Well Drained: 10%of site ❑ Poorly Drained %of site f.Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: ® 0-10%: 100 %of site ❑ 10-15%: %of site ❑ 15%or greater: %of site g.Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? ❑YesmNo If Yes,describe: h. Surface water features. i Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies(including streams,rivers, ❑YesmNo ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? ❑YesmNo If Yes to either i or n,continue. If No,skip to E.21 in Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, ❑YesmNo state or local agency? iv For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site,provide the following information: • Streams: Name Classification • Lakes or Ponds: Name Classification • Wetlands- Name Approximate Size • Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired El Yes ONo waterbodies? If yes,name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: i.Is the project site in a designated Floodway? ❑Yes,oNo j.Is the project site in the 100 year Floodplain? ❑YesmNo k.Is the project site in the 500 year Floodplain? ❑YesmNo 1.Is the project site located over,or immediately adjoining,a primary,principal or sole source aquifer? mYes❑No If Yes: t Name of aquifer:Sole Source Aquifer Names Nassau-Suffolk SSA Page 11 of 13 m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: Native Birds Rabbits Sgwrels n.Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? ❑YesmNo If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community(composition,function,and basis for designation): ii. Source(s)of description or evaluation: iii Extent of community/habitat: • Currently: acres • Following completion of project as proposed: acres • Gain or loss(indicate+or-): acres o.Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as ❑YesmNo endangered or threatened,or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare,or as a species of ❑YesmNo special concern? q.Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting,trapping,fishing or shell fishing? ❑YesmNo If yes,give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to ❑YesmNo Agriculture and Markets Law,Article 25-AA,Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: b.Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? ❑YesmNo i If Yes: acreage(s)on project site? h. Source(s)of soil rating(s): c. Does the project site contain all or part of,or is it substantially contiguous to,a registered National ❑YesmNo Natural Landmark? If Yes: r Nature of the natural landmark: ❑Biological Community ❑ Geological Feature n Provide brief description of landmark,including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? ❑YesmNo If Yes: i. CEA name: ii Basis for designation: rir. Designating agency and date: Page 12 of 13 e.Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district ❑Yes®No which is listed on,or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on,the State or National Register of Historic Places? If Yes: i.Nature of historic/archaeological resource: E3 Archaeological Site ❑Historic Building or District ii. Name: iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: f.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ®Yes❑No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory? g.Have additional archaeological or historic site(s)or resources been identified on the project site? ❑Yes®No If Yes: i.Describe possible resource(s): d. Basis for identification: h.Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal,state,or local ❑Yes®No scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: r. Identify resource: ii Nature of,or basis for,designation(e.g.,established highway overlook,state or local park,state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): in Distance between project and resource: miles. L Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild,Scenic and Recreational Rivers ❑Yes®No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i Identify the name of the river and its designation: ii Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? ❑Yes❑No F.Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal,please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Andrew V.Giambertone Date 10/04/2017(revised) Signature Title PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 EAF Mapper Summary Report Tuesday, April 11, 2017 3:14 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist -" :,r project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form(EAF) Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks Although 3 �_ x the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC,you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order T to obtain data not provided by the Mapper Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations AJ ff t+k' ,.' ..0. r6Fs r}� - �2 ,A -%Fn, a 6u - �"ttd�`,rM•• rk_ ,.,'�btk:'int -C SX.H+..r _ r �a+�t"�ys irvl- -'Sr„' th 61 .yY T FSrt�ritca • - _ e _H,ox'e ,Q r; �.�',�. �' f�flC�°t�3"�d3T ,`r"na`u`,-- ", T}' b „'E' - - ji'aY�-� .'�s�a i.=`3`^- ,.�E''-' id�9t?«' ,:, >,.,.. „�^^ar^`". - � �. q 51"v � -- fi,t,r•.._ -�',7», - -a „'_n- - za*t� nw 5'5 61 ' ' a ntgj"`, ajnt p �3 ..tEr , �^ NT'F14 Ean-E-�rir, ') INZOV,Dv?60 Jrr : Pitt�iari'=,`, Sri.,, � E: "l `'d`" Ks s? .Earai f7 s lsricl � +Ea rrlylaa iia PI GG - ,u a#uYo u�'.',, het :int ams . § tfvLB czrraatsfitsc cl°tr�' zi�r;,'{ �,, JtFEfrSEPCT`!?Td33aa?„�' sgl�.'s`� ,te 1 sad <<' ,t�a, xrajr +,ur�#3; B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area] !Yes 'B.I.ii [Local WaterfrontRevitalizationArea] IYes C.2.b. [Special Planning District] JYes- Digital mapping data are not available for all Special Planning Districts. _ Refer to EAF Workbook. C.2.b. [Special Planning District-Name] NYS Heritage Areas:Ll North Shore Heritage Area E.1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site- Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF (Potential Contamination History] _ Workbook. . E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site 1Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF 'Listed'] IE.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site- Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Environmental Site Remediation Database] ?Workbook. E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000'of DEC Remediation Yes 'E.1.h.iil [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation 1152218 ;Site- DEC ID] n A jE.2.g [Unique Geologic Features] lNo ,E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features] JNo i E.2.h.11 [Surface Water Features] No 1E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features] lNo E 2 h.v[Impaired Water Bodies] �No E.2.i. [Floodway] No,. E.2J. [100 Year Floodplain] INo ;E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain] eNo ,E.2.1. [Aquifer Names] Sole Source Aquifer Names:Nassau-Suffolk SSA Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 E.2.n. [Natural Communities] No E 2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species] iNo E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals] ,No E.3.a. [Agricultural District] ��� ��� No E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark] jNo 'E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] �No E.3.e. [National Register of Historic Places] iDigital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF `Workbook ...»o..,Y..-.n....�...w.m..�...,..-......,�,...,..e. .a......@,.�..�n�—..«...«-.,..».,.:.n..e.»,W......�.-�.�..«»e�,e_�»...wn—....,..,.•-...�..«»«,..»«-..«....»„»,....».�.....�,.»=..begs.�..:x.... w.�-.-,..,�.�,»«..«.:««...��»,..�.».,».:».....-,«....««.«..»�w�v.»,.R._..«w«���>...e.«»...�. �E.3.f. [Archeological Sites] ;Yes E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor] jNo ' Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 2 Agency Use Only[If applicable] Full Environmental Assessment form Project The Enclaves Hotel&Restaurant Part 2-Identification of Potential Project Impacts Date: I November 15,2017 Part 2 is to be completed by the lead agency. Part 2 is designed to help the lead agency inventory all potential resources that could be affected by a proposed project or action. We recognize that the lead agency's reviewer(s)will not necessarily be environmental professionals. So,the questions are designed to walls a reviewer through the assessment process by providing a series of questions that can be answered using the information found in Part 1. To further assist the lead agency in completing Part 2,the form identifies the most relevant questions in Part 1 that will provide the information needed to answer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is completed,the lead agency will have identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity. If the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area,complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Tips for completing Part 2: • Review all of the information provided in Part 1. • Review any application,maps,supporting materials and the Full EAF Workbook. • Answer each of the 18 questions in Part 2. • If you answer"Yes"to a numbered question,please complete all the questions that follow in that section. • If you answer"No"to a numbered question,move on to the next numbered question. • Check appropriate column to indicate the anticipated size of the impact. • Proposed projects that would exceed a numeric threshold contained in a question should result in the reviewing agency checking the box"Moderate to large impact may occur." • The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis. • If you are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact,it may help to review the sub-questions for the general question and consult the workbook. • When answering a question consider all components of the proposed activity,that is,the"whole action". • Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct impacts. • Answer the question in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of the project. 1. Impact on Land Proposed action may involve construction on, or physical alteration of, []NO OYES the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1. D.1) If"Yes", answer questions a J. I "No", move on to Section 2. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large - Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is E2d ® ❑ less than 3 feet. b.The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15%or greater. E2f ® ❑ c. The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrock is exposed,or E2a ® ❑ generally within 5 feet of existing ground surface. d.The proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons D2a ® ❑ of natural material. e. The proposed action may involve constriction that continues for more than one year D 1 e ❑ or in multiple phases. £The proposed action may result in increased erosion,whether from physical D2e,D2q ❑ disturbance or vegetation removal(including from treatment by herbicides). g.The proposed action is,or may be,located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area. B 1 i ® ❑ h. Other impacts: Clearing+/-5 92 acres of 6 75-acre site ❑ Page 1 of 10 2. Impact on Geological Features The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of, or inhibit access to, any unique or unusual land forms on the site (e.g., cliffs, dunes, ®NO ❑YES minerals, fossils, caves). (See Part 1. E.2.g) If"Yes", answer questions a- C. I "No", move on to Section 3. ^ Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. Identify the specific land form(s)attached: E2g ❑ ❑ b.The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological feature listed as a E3c ❑ ❑ registered National Natural Landmark. Specific feature: c. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 3. Impacts on Surface Water The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water [:1 NO ®YES bodies (e.g., streams,rivers, ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2,E.21) If Yes", answer questions a- 1. If"No", move on to Section 4. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may create a new water body. D2b,D I h ® ❑ b.The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10%or more than a D2b ® ❑ 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water., c.The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material D2a ® ❑ from a wetland or water body. d.The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or E2h ® ❑ tidal wetland,or in the bed or banks of any other water body. e.The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody,either from upland erosion, D2a,132h ® ❑ runoff or by disturbing bottom sediments. f. The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s)for withdrawal D2c m ❑ of water from surface water. g.The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfall(s)for discharge D2d ® ❑ of wastewater to surface water(s). h.The proposed action may cause soil erosion,or otherwise create a source of D2e ® ❑ stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies. i.The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or E2h ® ❑ downstream of the site of the proposed action. j. The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides in or D2q,E2h ® ❑ around any water body. k.The proposed action may require the construction of new,or expansion of existing, D 1 a,D2d ❑ m wastewater treatment facilities. Page 2 of 10 1. Other impacts:upslope of tidal creek/Peconic Estuary,Win Town LWRP area,project exceeds ❑ sewage density,unknown future fertilization plan 4. Impact on groundwater The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water, or []NO ®YES may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer. (See Part 1. D.2.a, D.2.c, D.2.d, D.2.p, D.2.q, D.2.t) If "Yes", answer questions a-h. If"No", move on to Section S. . ' Relevant No,or Moderate ` Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may require new water supply wells,or create additional demand D2c ® ❑ on supplies from existing water supply wells. b. Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable D2c ® ❑ withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer. Cite Source: c.The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and Dla,D2c 21 ❑ sewer services. d.The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater. D2d,E21 ❑ e.The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations D2c,Elf, ® ❑ where groundwater is,or is suspected to be,contaminated. Elg,Elh f.The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chemical products D2p,E21 ® ❑ over ground water or an aquifer. g.The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 E2h,D2q, ® ❑ feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. E21,D2c h. Other impacts:The proposed action will exceed SCDHS density standards requires on-site ❑ m sewage treatment sole source aquifer,Increase demand on water supply, former agricultural use possible past on-site pesticl a use 5. Impact on Flooding The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding. NO ®YES (See Part 1. E.2) If"Yes", answer questions a-g. If"No", naove on to Section 6. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway. E2i ® ❑ b. The proposed action may result in development within a 100 year floodplain. E2j ® ❑ c.The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. E2k ® ❑ d.The proposed action may result in,or require,modification of existing drainage D2b,D2e ® ❑ patterns. e.The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding. D2b,E2i, ® ❑ E2j,E2k f. If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action,is the dam in need of repair, Ele ® ❑ or upgrade? Page 3 of 10 g.Other impacts:Project will generate more runoff stormwater could runoff on to adjacent ® ❑ properties or street if not properly controlled 6. Impacts on Air The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source. ZNO YES (See Part 1. D.21,D,2,h,D.2.g) If"Yes", answer questions a-f. If"No", move on to Section 7. Relevant No,or Moderate - Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. If the proposed action requires federal or state air emission permits,the action may also emit one or more greenhouse gases at or above the following levels: i. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide(CO2) D2g ❑ ❑ ii. More than 3.5 tons/year of nitrous oxide(N20) D2g ❑ ❑ iii.More than 1000 tons/year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbons(PFCs) D2g ° ° iv.More than 045 tons/year of sulfur hexafluoride(SF6) D2g v. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide equivalent of D2g ° ° hydrochloroflourocarbons(HFCs)emissions vi. 43 tons/year or more of methane D2h b.The proposed action may generate 10 tons/year or more of any one designated D2g ❑ ❑ hazardous air pollutant,or 25 tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous air pollutants. c. The proposed action may require a state air registration,or may produce an emissions D2f,D2g ❑ ❑ rate of total contaminants that may exceed 5 lbs.per hour,or may include a heat source capable of producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. d.The proposed action may reach 50%of any of the thresholds in"a"through"c", D2g ❑ ❑ above. e.The proposed action may result in the combustion or thermal treatment of more than 1 D2s ❑ ❑ ton of refiise per hour. f.Other impacts: ° ❑ 7. Impact on Plants and Animals The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part 1. E.2. m.-q.) ONO ®YES I "Yes", ansiver questions a J. If"No", move on to Section 8. ` Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may ` a 7 may occur occur a.The proposed action may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any E2o ® ❑ threatened or endangered species,as listed by New York State or the Federal government,that use the site,or are found on,over,or near the site. b.The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2o ® ❑ any rare,threatened or endangered species,as listed by New York State or the federal government. c. The proposed action may cause reduction in population,or loss of individuals,of any E2p ® ❑ species of special concern or conservation need,as listed by New York State or the Federal government,that use the site,or are found on,over,or near the site. d.The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2p ® ❑ any species of special concern and conservation need,as listed by New York State or the Federal government. Page 4 of 10 e.The proposed action may diminish the capacity of a registered National Natural E3c ® ❑ Landmark to support the biological community it was established to protect. f.The proposed action may result in the removal of,or ground disturbance in,any E2n ® ❑ portion of a designated significant natural community. Source: g.The proposed action may substantially interfere with nesting/breeding,foraging,or Elm ® El habitat for the predominant species that occupy or use the project site. h.The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acres of forest, Elb ® ❑ grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat. Habitat type&information source: i.Proposed action(commercial, industrial or recreational projects,only)involves use of D2q ® ❑ herbicides or pesticides. j. Other impacts:Mapper indicate presence of rare plants in area.Past NHP letter notes 2 ❑ threatened plants w/habitat needs similar to site(which is proposed to be cleared) 8. Impact on Agricultural Resources The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part 1. E.3.a. and b.) ]NO ZYES If"Yes", answer questions a- h. If"No", move on to Section 9. " Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large „ Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may impact soil classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the Etc,E3b ® ❑ NYS Land Classification System. b.The proposed action may sever,cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land Ela,Elb ® ❑ (includes cropland,hayfields,pasture,vineyard,orchard,etc). c. The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of E3b ® ❑ active agricultural land. d.The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural Elb,E3a ® ❑ uses,either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District,or more than 10 acres if not within an Agricultural District. e.The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an agricultural land El a,Elb ® ❑ management system f.The proposed action may result,directly or indirectly,in increased development C2c,C3, ® ❑ potential or pressure on farmland. D2c,D2d g.The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland C2c ® ❑ Protection Plan. h.Other impacts:Former agricultural use Haven loam 0-2%,prime ag soils,capability class 1-1 ® ❑ Page 5 of 10 9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources The land use of the proposed action are obviously different from, or are in [:]NO WIYES sharp contrast to, current land use patterns between the proposed project and a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1. E.La,E.Lb, E.3.h.) If"Yes", answer questions a-g. If"No", o to Section 10. Relevant No,or Moderate - Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal,state,or local E3h ® ❑ scenic or aesthetic resource. b.The proposed action may result in the obstruction,elimination or significant E3h,C2b ® ❑ screening of one or more officially designated scenic views. c. The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: E3h i. Seasonally(e.g.,screened by summer foliage,but visible during other seasons) ❑ IZI ii.Year round ❑ d.The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed E3h action is: E2q, i. Routine travel by residents,including travel to and from work ❑ ii. Recreational or tourism based activities Elc ® ❑ e. The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and E3h ® ❑ appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource. f. There are similar projects visible within the following distance of the proposed Dla,E1 a, ® ❑ project: Dlf,Dlg 0-1/2 mile '/2-3 mile 3-5 mile 5+ mile g.Other impacts:Introduction of Special Exception use(hotel)adjacent to residential area,need ❑ additional review of outdoor lighting,landscaping,architecture,signage 10. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological [:]NO AYES resource. (Part'1. E.3.e, f. and g.) If`'Yes", answer questions a-e. If"No", go to Section 11. Relevant No,or Moderate = ' Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within,or substantially contiguous De ® ❑ to,any buildings,archaeological site or district which is listed on or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on the State or National Register of Historic Places. b.The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within,or substantially contiguous E3f ❑ IZI to,an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory. c.The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within,or substantially contiguous E3g ❑ to,an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory. Source:In 2009 OPRHP requested additional archaeological investigations be conducted Page 6 of 10 d. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ If any of the above(a-d)are answered"Moderate to large impact may e. occur",continue with the following questions to help support conclusions in Part 3: i. The proposed action may result in the destruction or alteration of all or part E3e,E3g, ❑ m of the site or property. E3f ii. The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property's setting or De,E3f, ❑ m integrity. E3g,Ela, Elb iii. The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which De,E3f, ❑ m are out of character with the site or property,or may alter its setting. E3g,E3h, C2,C3 11. Impact on Open Space and Recreation The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a ZNO ❑YES reduction of an open space resource as designated in any adopted municipal open space plan. (See Part 1. C.2.c, E.l.c.,E.2.q.) If Yes", answer questions a-e. If"No", o to Section 12. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions,or"ecosystem D2e,Elb ❑ ❑ services",provided by an undeveloped area,including but not limited to stormwater E2h, storage,nutrient cycling,wildlife habitat. E2m,Ego, E2n,E2 b.The proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource. C2a,E 1 c, ❑ ❑ C2c,E2 c. The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an area C2a,C2c ❑ ❑ with few such resources. Elc,E2q d.The proposed action may result in loss of an area now used informally by the C2c,E 1 c ❑ ❑ community as an open space resource. e. Other impacts: ° ° 12. Impact on Critical Environmental Areas The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical ❑✓ NO ❑YES environmental area(CEA). (See Part 1. E.3.d) If'"Yes", answer questions a-e. If 'No", o to Section 13, Relevant No,or Moderate Part 1 small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or E3d ❑ ❑ characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. b.The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or E3d ❑ ❑ characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. c.Other impacts:_ ° ° Page 7 of 10 13. Impact on Transportation The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems. [:]NO ZYES (See Part 1. D.2J) 1 "Yes", answer questions a-f If"No", o to Section 14. ~. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may - � may occur occur a.Projected traffic increase may exceed capacity of existing road network. D2j ® ❑ b.The proposed action may result in the construction of paved parking area for 500 or D2j ® ❑ more vehicles. c.The proposed action will degrade existing transit access. D2j ® ❑ d.The proposed action will degrade existing pedestrian or bicycle accommodations. D2j ® ❑ e.The proposed action may alter the present pattern of movement of people or goods. D2j ® ❑ f. Other impacts:Increased traffic may affect seasonally busy roadway,nearby intersections& ❑ business district-additional study needed to determine impacts to mayor roadway 14. Impact on Energy The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy. [:]NO ©YES (See Part 1. D.21) If"Yes", answer questions a- e. If"No", o to Section 15. Relevant No,or Moderate , EPart I small to large Question(s) impact impact may u may occur occur a. The proposed action will require a new,or an upgrade to an existing,substation. D2k ® ❑ b.The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission DIf, ® ❑ or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a Dlq,D2k commercial or industrial use. c. The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 MWhrs per year of electricity. D2k ® ❑ d.The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square Dl g ® ❑ feet of building area when completed. e.Other Impacts: ❑ ❑ 15. Impact on Noise, Odor,and Light The proposed action may result in an increase in noise, odors,or outdoor lighting. ONO ©YES (See Part 1. D.2.m., n., and o.) I "Yes", answer questions a-,f If"No", o to Section 16. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by local D2m ❑ regulation. b. The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 feet of any residence, D2m,Eld ® ❑ hospital,school,licensed day care center,or nursing home. c.The proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day. D2o ❑ ❑ Page 8 of 10 d.The proposed action may result in light shining onto adjoining properties. D2n ❑ e.The proposed action may result in lighting creating sky-glow brighter than existing D2n,Ela ❑ area,conditions. f. Other impacts:Outdoor seating area,outdoor music,outdoor swimming pool,exterior lighting to ❑ be provided,anticipate air conditioning units,some adjacent uses are residential 16. Impact on Human Health The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure ❑NO ®YES to new or existing sources of contaminants. (See Part 1.D.2.q.,E.1. d. f. g. and h.) I "Yes", answer questions a-M. If"No", o to Section 17. Relevant No,or Moderate " sPart I small to large Question(s) impact impact may � may occur occur a.The proposed action is located within 1500 feet of a school,hospital,licensed day Eld ® ❑ care center,group home,nursing home or retirement community. b.The site of the proposed action is currently undergoing remediation. Elg,Elh ® ❑ c.There is a completed emergency spill remediation,or a completed environmental site Elg,Elh ® ❑ remediation on,or adjacent to,the site of the proposed action. d. The site of the action is subject to an institutional control limiting the use of the Elg,Elh ❑ ❑ property(e.g.,easement or deed restriction). e.The proposed action may affect institutional control measures that were put in place Elg,E 1 h ® ❑ to ensure that the site remains protective of the environment and human health. f.The proposed action has adequate control measures in place to ensure that future D2t m ❑ generation,treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes will be protective of the environment and human health. g.The proposed action involves construction or modification of a solid waste D2q,Elf ® ❑ management facility. h.The proposed action may result in the unearthing of solid or hazardous waste. D2q,Elf ® ❑ i.The proposed action may result in an increase in the rate of disposal,or processing,of D2r,D2s ® ❑ solid waste. j.The proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2000 feet of Elf,Elg ® ❑ a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Elh k.The proposed action may result in the migration of explosive gases from a landfill Elf,Elg ® ❑ site to adjacent off site structures. 1. The proposed action may result in the release of contaminated leachate from the D2s,Elf, ® ❑ project site. D2r in. Other impacts:The property was used for agriculture in the past and pesticides may have been ® ❑ used Page 9 of 10 17. Consistency with Community Plans The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. E]NO YES (See Part 1. C.1, C.2. and C.3.) If Yes", answer questions a-h. If"No", go to Section 18. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action's land use components may be different from,or in sharp C2,C3,Dla ® ❑ contrast to,current surrounding land use pattem(s). Ela,Elb b.The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city,town or village C2 ® ❑ in which the project is located to grow by more than 5%. c.The proposed action is inconsistent with local land use plans or zoning regulations. C2,C2,C3 ® ❑ d.The proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans,or other regional land use C2,C2 ® ❑ plans. e.The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development that is not C3,Dlc, ® ❑ supported by existing infrastructure or is distant from existing infrastructure. Dld,Dlf, Dld,Elb f.The proposed action is located in an area characterized by low density development C4,D2c,D2d ® ❑ that will require new or expanded public infrastructure. D2j g.The proposed action may induce secondary development impacts(e.g.,residential or C2a ® ❑ commercial development not included in the proposed action) Ether: Requires a Special Exception permit must be consistent with comprehensive and other ❑ applicable plans,compatibility with residences important 18. Consistency with Community Character The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character. F�NO ©YES (See Part 1. C.2, C.3,D.2,E.3) I "Yes", answer questions a- . I "No",proceed to Part 3. Relevant No,or Moderate _ Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities,structures,or areas E3e,E3f,E3g ® ❑ of historic importance to the community. b.The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services(e.g. C4 ® ❑ schools,police and fire) c.The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where C2,C3,D1 f ® ❑ there is a shortage of such housing. DIg,Ela d.The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized C2,E3 ® ❑ or designated public resources. e. The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and C2,C3 ® ❑ character. f. Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. C2,C3 ® ❑ Ela,Elb E2g,E2h g.Other impacts:Special Exception use,compatibility w/adjacent residences,more review of ❑ outdoor lighting&music,architecture,landscaping,screening,signage) PRINT FULL FORM Page 10 of 10 Project: The Enclaves Htl&Restaurant l Date November 16,2017 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 3-Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts and Determination of Significance Part 3 provides the reasons in support of the determination of significance. The lead agency must complete Part 3 for every question in Part 2 where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not,or may,result in a significant adverse environmental impact. Based on the analysis in Part 3,the lead agency must decide whether to require an environmental impact statement to further assess the proposed action or whether available information is sufficient for the lead agency to conclude that the proposed action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact. By completing the certification on the next page,the lead agency can complete its determination of significance. Reasons Supporting This Determination: To complete this section: • Identify the impact based on the Part 2 responses and describe its magnitude. Magnitude considers factors such as severity, size or extent of an impact. • Assess the importance of the impact. Importance relates to the geographic scope,duration,probability of the impact occurring,number of people affected by the impact and any additional environmental consequences if the impact were to occur. • The assessment should take into consideration any design element or project changes. • Repeat this process for each Part 2 question where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not,or may,result in a significant adverse environmental impact. • Provide the reason(s)why the impact may,or will not,result in a significant adverse environmental impact • For Conditional Negative Declarations identify the specific condition(s)imposed that will modify the proposed action so that no significant adverse environmental impacts will result. • Attach additional sheets,as needed. SEE ATTACHED Determination of Significance -'Type 1 and Unlisted Actions SEQR Status: ❑ Type 1 ©Unlisted Identify portions of EAF completed for this Project: Q✓ Part 1 ®Part 2 ❑✓ Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF,as noted,plus this additional support information EAF Parts 1 2.3%Architectural Plans and Elevations prepared by Andrew Giambertone Associates:Site Plans prepared by PWGC project application and application support materials submitted by the applicant,Town Planning records/consultations with involved agencies and considering both the magnitude and importance of each identified potential impact,it is the conclusion of the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals as lead agency that: ❑ A. This project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment,and,therefore,an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly,this negative declaration is issued. ❑ B. Although this project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment,that impact will be avoided or substantially mitigated because of the following conditions which will be required by the lead agency: There will,therefore,be no significant adverse impacts from the project as conditioned,and,therefore,this conditioned negative declaration is issued. A conditioned negative declaration may be used only for UNLISTED actions(see 6 NYCRR 617A). 0 C. This Project may result in one or more significant adverse impacts on the environment,and an environmental impact statement must be prepared to further assess the impact(s)and possible mitigation and to explore alternatives to avoid or reduce those impacts. Accordingly,this positive declaration is issued. Name of Action: The Enclaves Site Plan and Special Exception Permit Name of Lead Agency: Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Leslie Kanes Weisman Title of Responsible Officer: Town of Southold Zoning B rd Appeals Chairper r Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Date: Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer)�64 Date: 11/15/17 kv For Further Information: Contact Person: Kim Fuentes Address: 54375 Main Road,Southold,NY 11971 Telephone Number:(631)765-1809 E-mail: kim fuentes@town.southold ny us For Type 1 Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations,a copy of this Notice is sent to: Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located(e.g.,Town/City/Village of) Other involved agencies(if any) Applicant(if any) Environmental Notice Bulletin: http://www.dec.nv.aov/enb/enb.html PRIM' FULL FORM I Page 2 of 2 FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM PART 3 ATTACHMENT SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT FOR PROPOSED "THE ENCLAVES" HOTEL AND RESTAURANT 56655 Main Street, Southold Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts Determination of Significance Introduction The Applicant, "56655 Main Street, LLC," submitted an application for a Special Exception Permit to the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") for"The Enclaves"hotel and restaurant. Submitted in addition to the application were Site Plans prepared by PWGC (last revised April 11, 2017), Architectural Plans and Elevations prepared by Andrew Giambertone Associates (last revised April 13, 2017), a Long Environmental Assessment Form ("LEAF") Part 1 (dated July 7, 2017, revised October 4, 2017) and associated materials submitted in support of the Special Exception Permit Application. The Town ZBA The proposed project is an "Unlisted" action pursuant to SEQRA, and therefore requires environmental review under SEQRA. Location The subject property is located on the north side of Main Road, +/-830 feet east of Boisseau Avenue and +/-90 feet west of the intersection of Main Road and Town Harbor Lane in the Town of Southold. The property address is 56655 Route 25 ("Main Road") and the subject parcel is identified as Suffolk County Tax Map District 1000, Section 63, Block 3, Lot 15. The site is 6.75 acres in area, is zoned "Hamlet Business" and is located within a mixed commercial/single-family residential neighborhood. The property is currently partially developed with a two-story single-family home, detached garage and two sheds but is mostly undeveloped, and contains a small lawn, some ornamental landscaping, fringing/perimeter woodlands and old field successional growth associated with a former agricultural use. Description of the Proposed Action The applicant's proposal includes the following: • Expansion and renovation of an existing two-story home, including connecting an existing adjacent shed and converting these structures to a 74-seat"sit-down"restaurant. • Construction of a 44-room hotel including,a two-story L-shaped hotel building containing 40 +/-545 square foot hotel rooms and four detached+/-620 square foot cottages; i W Page 1 of 6 ks"R_ Full EAF Part 3 Attachment Evaluation of Magnitude&Importance of Project Impacts Determination of Significance • Installation of an outdoor in-ground swimming pool, pool patio, and pool cabanas on the west side of the proposed hotel building, a small decorative fish pond on the south side of the building, drainage catch basins and subsurface leaching pools to address stormwater runoff, an advanced on-site sewage treatment facility at the northeast corner of the property for on-site sanitary waste treatment and disposal, other necessary utilities (public water connections, electricity, etc.) and miscellaneous minor amenities and accessory features. • Construction of an access driveway and two parking lots totaling 25 spaces for the restaurant and an additional parking lot containing 88 spaces for the proposed hotel use. • Removal of one of the existing sheds and retention and reuse of an existing one-story detached garage. A Special Exception Use Permit is required from the ZBA for the hotel use and Site Plan review is required by the Town Planning Board. The proposed action will also require a sewage discharge permit and a State Pollution Discharge Elimination System ("SPDES") General Permit for stormwater discharge from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ("NYSDEC"), a sewage treatment facility approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services ("SCDHS"), a public water service connection approval from the Suffolk County Water Authority ("SCWA"), electrical service provided by PSEG Long Island; an access/curb cut/work permit from the New York State Department of Transportation ("NYSDOT"), and consultation with the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation ("OPRHP") due to the site's potential archaeological sensitivity. Application Review The EAF Parts 1, 2 and this Part 3 Attachment provide the information necessary for the Lead Agency, the Town of Southold ZBA, to adopt a State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA") declaration indicating the potential significance of the proposed action and whether additional steps will be required to further evaluate impacts and mitigations in fulfillment of 6 NYCRR Part 617 (SEQRA). Based on the review of the above described documents, including existing environmental conditions and project plans, it appears that the proposed action may result in one or more moderate-to-large environmental impact(s) as outlined below. Therefore, issuance of a "Positive Declaration" is warranted, requiring the preparation of a full Environmental Impact Statement ("EIS"). The information submitted to date requires additional essential details and analyses to properly evaluate the project's environmental impacts and render a final Determination of Significance (under SEQRA) and must be amended accordingly to fulfill the standards and requirements of a SEQRA Draft EIS ("DEIS"). The DEIS for this project must be guided by the attached EAF Part 2 and this EAF Part 3 report, and the content of a final scoping document after a public scoping A Page 2 of 6 Full EAF Part 3 Attachment Evaluation of Magnitude&Importance of Project Impacts Determination of Significance session is held. Applicants are therefore instructed to review the above referenced documents and prepare a draft scope that is suitable for public and ZBA review. Reasons Supporting this Determination • Impact on Land: Potential moderate to large impact. The project involves the clearing of +/-5.92 acres (approximately 88 percent) of a 6.75-acre lot. Soil will be significantly disturbed from excavation, backfilling, and grading from installation of building footings and foundations, drainage structures, on-site sewage leaching pools, an in-ground swimming pool, fish pond, water services and other utilities. Soil disturbance may result in erosion and transport of soil off-site by wind, runoff or tracking by construction vehicles exiting the site, if not properly controlled. The depths of necessary excavations, extent of necessary cut and fill/total volume of soil material to be excavated and total volume of soil and construction and demolition debris (C&D) to be removed from the site must be evaluated. The number of truck trips associated with the accessing and transport of demolition debris and soil during demolition and construction should also be determined. The duration of anticipated construction is anticipated to last in excess of one year and may impact nearby residents/businesses and Main Street. Any such impacts should be identified and discussed in detail, including anticipated duration and any necessary impact prevention or mitigation efforts. The proposed hotel use is a Special Exception Use which may contrast with adjacent residentially developed and zoned land and/or the Hamlet Business District if not properly designed to ensure it is properly integrated into the site and community. • Impact on Surface Water: Potential moderate to large impact. The proposed project exceeds SCDHS sewage density threshold standards. This condition triggers a requirement for the installation of an advanced on-site sewage treatment facility to reduce nutrients and other pollutants, which should be described in detail. The proposed development may affect the quality of water bodies downstream as topography and groundwater elevations at the subject property are up-gradient of two tidal creeks which are part of the greater Peconic Estuary. These creeks could be adversely affected by nitrogen loading which are soluble and highly mobile in surface runoff and groundwater. The site was formerly used for agricultural purposes and soils may still contain pesticide residues. Proposed landscaping may also increase nitrate loading at the site if fertilizers are applied and stormwater runoff is not properly controlled to prevent off-site transport including discharge to adjacent street drainage systems which may ultimately discharge to or near the creeks. The aforementioned creeks are roughly one-quarter mile from the subject site and further evaluation is warranted to ensure that stormwater runoff and nitrogen is properly controlled. The project site is also located within the Town's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program ("LWRP") boundary and therefore must be evaluated for consistency. !A Page 3 of 6 Full EAF Part 3 Attachment Evaluation of Magnitude&Importance of Project Impacts Determination of Significance • Impact on Groundwater: Potential moderate to large impact. The project will exceed SCDHS sewage density standards triggering the need for an on-site sewage treatment facility. The existing depth to groundwater and adequacy of separation distance for proposed drainage and wastewater leaching systems should be evaluated. The project must utilize a public water supply and will increase demand on this supply. Potable drinking water will be obtained from a sole source aquifer. The sole source aquifer will need to be protected and water conservation would be beneficial. • Impact on Flooding: Potential small impact. The site is not within a FEMA 100-year or 500-year flood zone but a significant portion of the site will be cleared and will be covered with impervious surfaces that generate runoff and reduce natural on-site recharge. Suitable drainage controls will have to be installed to ensure proper on-site drainage and prevent runoff on to streets or adjacent properties. • Impact on Plants and Animals: Potential moderate to large impact. Currently, most of the project site is vegetated naturally. According to the EAF Part 1, 5.92 acres or 88 percent of the 6.75-acre site will be physically disturbed including the removal of existing habitat and a significant number of trees on the property. NYSDEC's Environmental Mapper indicates that there are rare plants in the general area of the site and past NYSDEC Natural Heritage Program correspondence indicates that two rare plants identified in the area have habitat needs that are similar to existing site conditions. A through inventory of plants, animals and habitats should be performed, including evaluation of maintaining existing large diameter trees remaining along the perimeter of the property. • Impact on Agricultural Resources: Potential small impact. According to the Suffolk County Soil Survey, the project site contains Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent Capability Class I-1 prime agricultural soils. The presence of these soils, the site's flat topography, the fact that the property was formerly used for agricultural purposes, and the presence of agricultural land in the area, suggests that the site may be well suited for agriculture; however, the limited size of the property, its location within a Hamlet Business zoning district and the past abandonment of farming on the site, does reduce the property's agricultural significance and the potential for significant impacts. • Impact on Aesthetic Resources: Potential moderate to large impact. The proposed action involves the introduction of a Special Exception use (hotel) adjacent to residential uses and residentially zoned land, as well as located in the Hamlet center. The property is visible by local residents, persons who do business in the Hamlet Business District, and passersby along Main Road (SR 25). Main Road is a heavily traveled arterial road which experiences its heaviest use during the summer and early fall seasons, therefore the changers to the 6.75-acre site could affect visual conditions. Aesthetic/visual impacts could result if architecture, landscaping, outdoor lighting, and signage are not carefully designed or if suitable screening and appropriate transition between disparate uses are not provided. The existing building to be retained on-site dates back to the 19th Century and � Page 4 of 6 Full EAF Part 3 Attachment Evaluation of Magnitude&Importance of Project Impacts Determination of Significance along with other similar structures offers a distinct and desirable character that the Town may like to retain. The design of the hotel should be compatible with and not clash with the on-site building and the overall character of the area. To scale, computer generated imagery and line of sight sections from vantage points along Main Road and adjacent residential uses should be provided to demonstrate the visual and aesthetic effects of the proposed project prior to (i.e., the existing condition) and after construction is completed. • Impact on Historic and Archaeological Resources: Potential moderate to large impact. The subject property is located within a State designated archaeologically sensitive area. Previous Phase I and II archaeological surveys were conducted at the site and reports were submitted to the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation ("OPRHP") for review. The Phase II report stated that the site was not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The OPRHP, in its March 20, 2009 letter to the Town Planning Board, however, indicated that it did not concur with the Phase II archaeological survey's conclusion and requested that additional archaeological investigation be conducted. The status of the archaeological review should be fully documented, including consultation with OPRHP. • Impact on Transportation: Potential moderate to large impact. Increased traffic generated by the proposed hotel and restaurant may adversely affect Main Road (SR 25), which is a seasonally busy east/west arterial roadway. The extent of uses and activities proposed by the hotel and restaurant should be explained (i.e., anticipated frequency and times of day for various indoor and outdoor uses, types of events anticipated within meeting rooms and various seating areas shown by the floor plans, etc.). Main Road has just one lane in each direction and currently there are no turn lanes or traffic signalization at any of the nearby intersections. Increased traffic may affect turning movements at adjacent intersections, or result in delays on Main Road (SR 25). A 7-I1 convenience store is located almost directly across the street and potential conflicts with vehicles existing this use should be evaluated in relation to the proposed access. Bicycle and pedestrian activities by others in the area may also contribute to traffic/ pedestrian conflicts. The adequacy of the local street system to accommodate the proposed use without significant impacts should be demonstrated through a traffic study, including consultation with NYSDOT. Suitable traffic mitigation should be proposed as needed. • Impact on Noise, Odor and Light: Potential moderate to large impact. The proposed action will include an outdoor seating/dining area; outdoor music; outdoor swimming pool and pool patio area; air conditioning unit(s); driveway, walkway and parking lot lighting; and increased vehicle trip generation that will generate some noise and light and glare from headlights. These activities and conditions may increase ambient noise levels and possibly cause light-related impacts that could affect adjacent residential property or other land uses if not properly mitigated. *-..k_ iW Page 5 of 6 10"r Full EAF Part 3 Attachment Evaluation of Magnitude&Importance of Project Impacts Determination of Significance • Impact on Human Health: The potential magnitude of impact is unclear and therefore the following should be further assessed. Past agricultural activities may have involved the use of pesticides such as herbicides, insecticides or rodenticides. If so, and depending on the formulation used and its mobility and persistence in the environment, pesticide residue may still be present in soil and therefore could be released into the environment once soils are disturbed. The agricultural use was abandoned long ago but the potential for impacts needs to be further assessed. This would include soil sampling and development of a soil management plan if pesticides are present above actionable levels. Additionally, the extent of existing sanitary systems, oil tanks, asbestos containing materials (ACM), lead based paint or similar building materials that may be present and hazardous during demolition and construction activities should be discussed, including proposed measures necessary to prevent worker, future occupant or public exposure. • Consistency with Community Plans: Potential moderate to large impact. The project requires a Special Exception Use Permit from the ZBA and therefore must be evaluated for conformance to the Town's general Special Exception Use standards and any specific standards the Town may have for the hotel use (if applicable). In addition, the project should be shown to be consistent with the Town of Southold Comprehensive Implementation Strategy, the Scenic Southold Corridor Management Plan, the Hamlet Study, the Town LWRP, and any other applicable Town plan that has been adopted by the Town. Ensuring compatibility of the proposed land uses with adjacent residential uses is important. • Consistency with Community Character: Potential moderate to large impact. The proposed project involves a request for approval of a Special Exception Use adjacent to as-of-right residential and Hamlet Business uses. The compatibility of the proposed project with the on-site structures to remain, as well as adjacent land uses should be presented. Issues of concern under the community character category include consistency and compatibility with the land uses and zoning in the area, noise, outdoor lighting, landscaping, visual screening, architectural appearance, and signage. W, PagePage 6 of 6 KFU11- /Fuentes, Kim From: Andrew Giambertone <AVG@GiambertoneArchitects.com> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2017 8:27 AM ; To: Fuentes, Kim; Carrie OFarrell 'IX ly � Cc: Ernesto Silva OCT O'S 2017 Sub,.�ect: FW: Enclaves EAF comments Attachments: FEAFpartl-56655MainRd_2017-10-04.pdf, 'Sit& o,rd_370 Hobart Road.pdf; 56655 Main Rd, Southold Soil Boring Report.pdf; 56655 Main Rd, Southold Soil Boring Drawing.pdf Good Morning Kim and Carrie, Yesterday I forwarded you both the completed package addressing (I believe) all the questions and comments in Carries e-mail from last Friday. First I would kindly ask that you both confirm that you have received this package. Assuming you have, I have a procedural question as I want to make sure I follow proper protocol. As Carrie sent me the questions I simply replied back to her with the completed package and copied Kin. However, do all submissions have to go through the ZBA (Kim) and then be distributed to N &P? Don't want to lose any time due to procedure. Thank you both, and assuming that N&P find this package complete,what would be the next step? Respectfully Submitted,Andrew Andrew V. Giambertone, A.LA President AVG@Glambertonearchitects.com Andiew V: Giambertone Associates, Architects 62 f 1n1 Strc t, i-luuting�ton, New York 11743 Phone: {631) 367,0050 Fax: {631) 36' _ This mcszage is FbT the named recipient only.It may contain conttdcnrial,propriemry or Icgxlly pridcged information. If the thb,nlcagage is not the imvndod rer ig icm,you are lxercby riorifuxi that nny dissolination,A triburion,or copy lag of thk coo is.6tnCtIV 1+1`011ibitcd.If you h2ve rcceivcd titin tort munirat6oa in error,please 11,,11E}'us hitt eg2teiv by email,tctd delete the o; message form your compitm We reseru tate tight to monitor all etnait communications r"tlthougit Nye betiavcs this emA and ments are virtts-free,we do nor gta"Itte than it is%!ru.;-tree,and tvm acccp no liability farany loss or¢lamngc arising,front its From: Andrew Giambertone Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 4:25 PM To: Carrie OFarrell Cc: Fuentes, Kim; Ernesto Silva Subject: RE: Enclaves EAF comments Good Afternoon Carrie, Attached please find the completed and detailed FEAF as requested. 1 In addition we have attached the DEL Site Record of an Environmental Site remediation within 2000' of our project, as well as the Test boring plan, and boring logs we had executed on the site. Please review this information and let me know if there is anything else you require. I remain available to meet you in person to walk through the package,if you have any questions. Also please be advised that we will be conducting a traffic study in preparation for our inevitable (I hope) ZBA hearing. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or comments. Respectfully Submitted,Andrew Andrew V. Giambertone, A i A President AVG@Glambertonearchitects.com Andtew V Giambertone & 'Associates, Architects 62 Elm ; treer, Z(Lin ngtonr New York 11743 Phone. (6J l) 63005 rax: ( ) ata' This eatesmge is for the narned recipi"t on[y,It€ ay contain cQnfitEentinl,prespricmy or legafl privileggrI infarrnitionz if the, T114 MOS-5,W is 110€the lrn:m4ot e�si}�it rsx,yoka=� 111=by -tsift i€tea€ally di";raiks+non,or Copying of this con) i suictla i tohibhs,&if you hAve f ccivt.d this rolonttrrtication in tsrrot.please'llogfy us ittrtn;t(hirlely°by can aaal aclete'the'(A: sns ssaf e trc a your ccnnputes NVu reseivc the Tio,n to monitor all(im-rat comm uniraubns, r"iithc Legh we befrew'albs lanai(au4 mcnt5 are Virtr°s-froe,we 4.10 nor guaranree tlT�r it is virus=frc:c, Carl vie:acc€:pr no liaiwlit}foi any foss rw dani2gcarisidr frona its From: Carrie OFarrell [mailto:COFarrell nelsonpope.com] Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 5:45 PM To: Andrew Giambertone Cc: Fuentes, Kim Subject: Enclaves EAF comments Andrew, I apologize, I thought we had already send these comments—a bit of a mix up on our side. At any rate, there's some information gaps and clarifications needed on the Part I EAF to proceed. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation's (NYSDEC) online "Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Workbook" (http://www.(Iee.ny.gov/permits/91614.html) is a valuable resource that provides step-by-step instruction and numerous references and resources that can assist in completing the EAF Part 1 and ensuring that adequate information is included. 1. The project'description is quite limited and should be amended on Page 1 Section A to include more detail, such as: a) The number of rooms and general size of the proposed hotel units including number and size of detached cottages; b) The size of the restaurant in square feet and number of seats envisioned; c) Reference to the additions to the existing building/proposed restaurant and the size of the additions in square feet; d) Proposed use of the existing garage to be retained; e) Information regarding the number of parking spaces proposed and that an innovative sewage disposal system proposed; f) Also,the description is required to include the purpose and need of for the project as noted in the instructions under Section A; 2 ya`\, g) The types of permits and approvals and the dates or anticipated dates of submission of applications must be provided in the table in Section B on Page 2;Also, "SCSA" is listed as an agency that must issue an approval. It is unclear what SCSA stands for but it is likely a typographical error referring to Suffolk County Water Authority("SCWA"). Please revise accordingly. The zoning district the property is located in was not provided and must be included in Section C.3. on Page 3. 2. The general nature of the proposed land use must,be indicated in Section D.1.a on Page 3. 3. The anticipated duration of project construction from start to finish must be provided in Section D.1.e. on Page 3. 4. The purpose of the impoundment should be indicated on Page 4 in Section D.1.h.i. It is unclear if this refers to the swimming pool,fish pond, both or something else. Please clarify. 5. Page 4, Section D.2.a.: As per the NYSDEC's EAF Part 1 Workbook,the project would not involve excavation, dredging or mining as indicated UNLESS soil that is excavated for the purposes of the pool,fish pond, foundations or basements,the sanitary system, and drainage systems, involves shipping soil off-site. Please determine whether soil will be transported off-site and revise the answer, if necessary. 6. Total water usage/demand must be provided on Page 5 in Section D.2.c.i. Also,the name of the water district must be provided. 7. The nature of the liquid wastes to be generated on-site must be indicated on Page 5 Section D.2.d.ii. "Sanitary waste," unless other wastes are to be discharged. 8. Additional information is warranted on Page 6 Section D.2.d.v.to describe the proposed sanitary system. Along with the type of system, please indicate if the system is above ground or below ground and the number of gallons it will be designed to treat. 9. The on-site stormwater management structures should be explained further on Page 6 Section D.2.e.iii including whether the fish pond will be used for stormwater control,whether all runoff will be discharged to subsurface leaching pools or other areas such as rain gardens, open recharge areas, etc. 10. Questions in Section D.2.f. on Page 6 having to do with air emissions are not answered. 11. Questions in Section D.2.j. on Page 7 having to do with traffic are not answered. 12. The electricity provider should be indicated in Section D.2.k.ii., Page 7. 13. Details about sources of noise and the anticipated times of day and duration of noise must be provided on Page 8 in Section D.2.m.i. 14. Information about lighting must be provided on Page 8, Section D.2.n.i. 15. Section D.2.r. on Page 8 should be answered "yes" rather than "no" and the estimates of construction and demolition debris should be calculated and post construction solid waste generation should be estimated for the hotel use and restaurant.The remainder of questions under this section should also be answered accordingly. 16. According to the site survey, the property is 6.75 acres in area but the "Current Acreage" column in Section E.1.b. on Page 9 sums to just 6.029 acres.The remaining+/-0.75 of an acre must be accounted for. 17. Section E.1.h.3.iii on Page 10 indicates there is a NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation property(ID#152218) within 2,000 feet of the proposed project but no information is provided under Subsection iv to describe the current status of the site, as required. 18. It is unclear what the source of the soil information in Section E.2.c. is on Page 11 since there does not appear to be any soil boring information and the classifications indicated are not the soils identified by the Suffolk County Soil Survey which identifies the soils as Haven loam (HaA), 0 to 2 percent slopes. These soils are typically composed of well-drained loam. If soil boring data are available they should be submitted. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. We have also compiled a list of project information that I need to review with the Board and then can send out. We'll do that as soon as possible. Thank you, Carrie Carrie O'Farrell,AICP Senior Partner NELSON., POPE &VOORHIS, LLC 3 ENVIRONMENTAL - PLANNING • CONSULTING Long Island Office: 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, NY 11747 ph- (631)427-5665 ext.214 cofarrell@nelsonpopevoorhis.com Hudson Valley Office: 156 Route 59,Suite C6 Suffern,NY 10901 ph: (845)368-1472 Visit our website: www.nelsonpopevoo[his.com Confideotiality Nouse'the information conn mcd in thv,-orad,.nd any atitachments may be legally pnailaged and con`idenbal If you are not an mended i ecipient,you should not tetam,copy or use this e-r ail or any a achments for any purpose,ner disclose all or any pei t of the contents to any other person. 4 Fuentes, Kim From: Fuentes, Kim Sent: Friday, November 03, 2017 3:45 PM To: 'Andrew Giambertone' Cc: 'Carrie O'Farrell (COFarrell@nelsonpope.com)' Subject: ZBA The Enclaves Hi Andrew, The ZBA Board discussed the project at our Worl<Session and a number of potential significant impacts were discussed/identified. The Board instructed our SEQRA Consultant (Nelson, Pope &Voorhis)to draft a Positive Declaration and intends to adopt a resolution to declare themselves Lead Agency and issue the Positive Declaration at the Special Meeting of November 16. If the Board adopts this resolution, the applicant will be instructed to prepare a Draft Scope for an Environmental Impact Statement for the project. Perhaps you can advise the applicant that it would be appropriate to retain the necessary professionals for the environmental review and begin drafting the scope. Please contact our office with any further questions or concerns. Kim E. Fuentes Secretary to the Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold 54.375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 631-765-1809,Ex. 5011 E-mail:kimMsoutholdtownny.cgoov From: Andrew Giambertone [mailto:AVG('OGiambertoneArchitects.com] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2017 4:17 PM To: Fuentes, Kim; COFarrelKbnelsonpope.com Subject: RE: Enclaves EAF comments Good Afternoon Kim and Carrie, I was Just wondering what the outcome of today's meeting was as it pertains to the Enclaves. Any light you can shed on where we are at in the process, and what the general sense is as to the outcome of the SEQRA review might be would be greatly appreciated. Thanks so much,Andrew Andrew V. Giambertone, AIA President AVG@Giambertonearchitects.com 1 Andre V Giambertone & Associates, .Ar cfit ect8 V 6m Street-, R=ingt�n, New York 11 7 �one: (6D (631) '36 �I) '67'005Q F IRX. This rncs4age is for the narnod rz*ent only,It may fontain cQuFulenriaLpropricary or legatly priviler-f ,A infbrmati6n. If the 1114 rncs-�:,Igc is not the UnIcadtd recillicot,you arc hcrcbr tiotiftod that lnydi*scminar on,disift -n,orgopying of 4liq cosh is widly ptoldbNA,If),)u havc=Cj�llrd thj$ *0ftJJJJ4JAj1n,tion in trf0t, 11s JnTJ1t0dhqtdy 6,�w1all anli delote'the o' message ftGra your computer. We mserm the right to nionitor A ernwfl communiratioln,,, Although we believe this amid an-d ments afe vi rws-froe,we do noK gwi-rarit"th:al it is Virus-ftLe,an*[%ve arch-p no bbili ty fior any los5 or 4ini:agn ansi ng frorn its From: Fuentes, Kim [mailto:kimfOsoutholdtownny.cio Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 1:28 PM To: Andrew Giambertone Cc: 'Carrie O'Farrell (COFarreliCcbnelsonpope.com)'; Terry, Mark Subject: RE: Enclaves EAF comments Hi Andrew; A meeting has been scheduled with the ZBA Board members for next week to present the SEQRA consultant's initial review of submitted materials. This review will allow members to ask questions and comment on any concerns relating to the project's potential impacts. Kim E. Fuentes Secretary to the Zoning Board ofAppeals Town of Southold 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 631-765-1809, Ex. 5011 E-mail:kim-f@southoldtownny.go From: Andrew Giambertone [mailto:AVG@GiambertoneArchitects.com] Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 7:45 AM To: Fuentes, Kim; COFarrell(&nelsonpope.com Subject: RE: Enclaves EAF comments Good Morning Ladies, I'm just checking in to see where we are in the process. Can you please provide me an update? Much Appreciated,Andrew Andrew V. Giambertone, AJ A President AVG@Giambertonearchitects.com 3 A Andrew V. Giambertone. & Associates' Architects -ig�an, N�exvYork 117,13 Phone: (Of)-367,0050 (631) 36' 62 Elm Street, Flunt� D This rncssagx-is far the named redpient only.It may contain confultntiaL proprietary or]qatty pri0egd-infprmation. If the This rnc,,,s,,Lgc is not the inteadM r�rjpicnv,you atc Itcrcbry notiffixI thAt any d4svmination,distribution,or copying of this com is strictly proliNacd.If)%.iu hAvc rectived this oommunication in error,pleak nod(y us inin"NIL1101Y by enlail'tall ddcicthu 0: nicsgige from your computor. Nrcwrve the right to monitor all email comnnunicadom-Mtltough we behevv this'email and nients are vir&-fretwc tio nkat gwttantcc thit it is virus-free,inilwnrcpt no linbility for any lo.,N or jarnag�arising from its 4 c NELSON, POPE 6 VOORHIS, LLC ENVIRONMENTAL - PLANNING CONSULTING www nelsonpopevoorFhls com � V �EMORANDUM OCTa �� l ?017 4 To: Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals � 71 cc: Andrew V. Giambertone, Applicant From: Carrie O'Farrell, AICP, Senior Partner,Nelson, Pope &Voorhis Date: 10/17/2017 Re: The Enclaves Site Plan/Special Exception Use Permit Preliminary Environmental Review On behalf of the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals ("Board"), Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC ("NP&V") has been retained to assist the Board in the review of the proposed application of "56655 Main Street, LLC," for "The Enclaves" hotel and restaurant under the State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA"). NP&V has reviewed the Enclaves Site Plan/Special Exception Use Permit application, the Long Environmental Assessment Form ("LEAF") Part 1 (dated July 7, 2017, revised October 4, 2017), Site Plans prepared by PWGC (last revised April 11, 2017), Architectural Plans and Elevations prepared by Andrew Giambertone Associates (last revised April 13, 2017) and associated materials submitted in support of the Special Exception Permit Application for "The Enclaves" hotel and restaurant. The proposed project is an "Unlisted" action pursuant to SEQRA, and therefore requires environmental review under SEQRA. The purpose of the present review is to assist the Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA"), as Lead Agency, in its initial examination of submitted materials, and to provide preliminary input regarding the content, adequacy and accuracy of these materials for commencing formal environmental review under SEQRA. Background Information Location The subject property is located on the north side of Main Road, +/-830 feet east of Boisseau Avenue and +/-90 feet west of the intersection of Main Road and Town Harbor Lane in the Town of Southold. The property address is 56655 Route 25 ("Main Road") and the subject parcel is identified as Suffolk County Tax Map District 1000, Section 63, Block 3, Lot 15. The site is 6.75 acres in area, is zoned "Hamlet Business" and is located within a mixed commercial/s'ingle-family residential neighborhood. The property is currently partially developed with a two-story single-family home, detached garage and two sheds but is mostly undeveloped, and contains a small lawn, some ornamental landscaping, fringing/perimeter woodlands and old field successional growth associated with a former agricultural use. I The Enclaves Hotel&Restaurant Site Plan&Special Exception Use Permit Preliminary SEQRA Review Page 2 of 7 Proposed Action The action under review includes the following: • Expansion and renovation of an existing two-story home, including connecting an existing adjacent shed and converting these structures to a 74-seat"sit-down"restaurant. • Construction of a 44-room hotel including a two-story L-shaped hotel building containing 40 +/-545 square foot hotel rooms and four detached+/-620 square foot cottages; • Installation of an outdoor in-ground swimming pool, pool patio, and pool cabanas on the west side of the proposed hotel building, a small decorative fish pond on the south side of the building, drainage catch basins and subsurface leaching pools to address stormwater runoff, an advanced on-site sewage treatment facility at the northeast corner of the property for on-site sanitary waste treatment and disposal, other necessary utilities (public water connections, electricity, etc.) and miscellaneous minor amenities and accessory features. • Construction of an access driveway and two parking lots totaling 25 spaces for the restaurant and an additional parking lot containing 88 spaces for the proposed hotel use. • Removal of one of the existing sheds and retention and reuse of an existing one-story detached garage. A Special Exception Use Permit is required from the ZBA for the hotel use and Site Plan review is required by the Town Planning Board. Application Review Based on our initial review of the submitted application materials, it is our recommendation that the following information provided to the Board in the form of a Supplement to the EAF to present a more complete understating of potential impacts of the proposed action and to assist the Board in making a determination of significance. Once the necessary baseline materials have been submitted and the content and accuracy of those materials are determined to be acceptable, the formal environmental assessment will proceed. Suggested Supplemental Analyses Review of the Part 1 EAF, proposed plans and other submitted materials suggests that additional information would be helpful in evaluating the environmental impacts and significance of the proposed project. For this reason, additional information and analyses in the form of an Expanded Environmental Assessment Report ("EEA") is recommended. Figures, tables, diagrams, plans, photographs and appendices should be provided and referenced as needed or indicated below. Topics that should be addressed by the EEA are as follows. 1. Detailed Description of the Proposed Action: Description of the proposed action, including existing buildings and structures to be removed, proposed buildings, structures and land uses; number of hotel rooms and cottages; square footages of buildings, rooms CORPORATE OFFICE HUDSON VALLEY OFFICE 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD.MELVILLE NY 1 1747-2186 156 Route 59 Suite C6,SUFFERN NY 10901 PHONE (631)427-5665 • FAx (631)427-5620 PHONE (645)366-1472 - FAX (645)366-1 572 The Enclaves Hotel&Restaurant Site Plan&Special Exception Use Permit Preliminary SEQRA Review Page 3 of 7 and cottages; project layout; sanitary waste disposal method; water supply; site access points; proposed parking; and site circulation pattern; etc. Generally discuss changes in existing ground cover (impervious/buildings and paving, landscaping, old field, forest, etc.) and the type of drainage controls to be employed to prevent impacts; provide a general description of landscaping and outdoor lighting, and indicate any recreational facilities and/or open space to be provided including indoor and/or outdoor facilities. 2. Project Background, Need, Objectives and Benefits: This section should include existing site uses and general history of site uses;justification of the proposed project in terms of Town goals for the property and area; and public need. Project Sponsor objectives should state the Applicant's goals in pursuing the proposed project and the discussion of benefits to accrue to the community from the project should address any anticipated tax generation, the creation of temporary construction jobs, full and part-time employment once the proposed land uses are operational, enhanced business activity, etc. 3. Project Location: This section should describe the property address, Suffolk County tax map number, general location and setting description, and any special districts the property may be located in. 4. Construction: This section should include a brief description of anticipated demolition and construction processes and construction schedule, anticipated construction phasing, necessary staging/construction worker parking areas and indication of conformance with NYSDEC/Town stormwater and erosion control requirements. Indicate whether construction schedules will adhere to any applicable ambient noise standards including permissible hours of operation\ the Town may have or other means for avoiding or mitigating impacts. 5. Approvals: This section should include a brief discussion or listing of required variances, development permits, reviews and approvals from the Town, or any other involved Federal, State or County agencies. 6. Soils & Topography_ Summary of existing soil conditions based on soil borings and the Soil Survey of Suffolk County,NY; identify impacts or potential development constraints from site soil conditions; and list impact avoidance and mitigation strategies to overcome development constraints or control dust, soil erosion, sedimentation/siltation or any other soil related issues. Provide soil boring sections and a soils map showing the soil types on- site. The existing topography and proposed grading should be described including the need for cut/fill to accommodate the proposed improvements (quantify cubic feet of cut/fill anticipated for site grading, building foundations, proposed drainage/utility installation, etc.). The anticipated number of truck trips necessary for cut/fill operations should also be quantified. 7. Surface Water: There are no surface waters or wetlands on or adjacent to the project site but the lot is roughly 1,200 feet from Town Creek and roughly 1,275 feet from Hippodrome Pond which are tidally influenced arms of the Peconic Estuary. An evaluation of any potential impacts to these waters from sewage discharge (particularly nitrate nitrogen) due to proposed development density and sewage generation, stormwater runoff, fertilization of lawns and landscaping or other potential contaminant sources should be explored and consistency with the Town's LWRP and, if applicable, CORPORATE OFFICE HUDSON VALLEY OFFICE 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD MELVILLE NY 1 1747-21 BB 158 Route 59 Suite C6,SUFFERN NY 10901 PHONE (631)427-5665 • FAX (631)427-5620 PHONE (B45)368-1472 • FAX (B45)388-1572 The Enclaves Hotel &Restaurant Site Plan&Special Exception Use Permit Preliminary SEQRA Review Page 4 of 7 the Peconic Estuary Conservation and Management Plan should be discussed. Impact avoidance and/or mitigation strategies for surface waters and wetlands should be presented if any impacts are identified. Provide figure showing regulated wetlands and surface waters in the area. 8. Groundwater: The known or estimated depth to groundwater beneath the site and direction of groundwater flow should be indicated using test hole/soil boring data or topography (i.e., surface elevation) and water table contour maps. An evaluation of any potential impacts to groundwater from sewage disposal (nitrogen, etc.), stormwater recharge, lawn fertilization or other potential sources of contamination should be explored and conformance with Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code should be demonstrated (See also community services discussion below). Groundwater impact avoidance and mitigation strategies should be provided as necessary. 9. Ecology: Conduct a field inspection, coordinate with the New York State Natural Heritage Program and use any other applicable and reputable resources (e.g., NYSDEC Environmental Mapper) to determine existing ecological conditions. A description of natural vegetation and ecological communities at the site should be provided and any New York State Exploitably Vulnerable, Special Concern, Threatened or Endangered vegetation or wildlife should be identified. Determine the level of clearing/habitat disturbance required by the project and briefly describe any easements or buffers and site landscaping that will remain or be provided. Indicate based on the proposed plans whether potential impacts to ecological resources can be anticipated and identify appropriate impact avoidance and mitigation techniques where possible and practical. 10. Land Use & Zoning: Using appropriate narrative, mapping and/or tables to describe current land use(s) and zoning of the project site and adjacent properties, and the overall pattern of land use and zoning in the vicinity. Discuss existing dimensional zoning requirements and permitted uses in the site's zoning district and whether zoning variances are needed. Discuss any applicable goals and/or recommendations of relevant comprehensive and other land use plans. Indicate conformance of the proposed project to existing land use and zoning patterns surrounding the site and discuss the project's compatibility and ability or lack thereof to be integrated into the fabric of the surrounding community. Identify/assess potential impacts to land use and zoning, consistency with adopted Town plans and provide appropriate mitigation as needed to reduce environmental impacts to the maximum extent practicable. Include figures showing land use and zoning of the subject site and adjacent land, including land on the opposite side of Route 25. 11. Community Character: Indicate the existing natural and developed character of the site and surrounding area and identify any visual resources. Provide photographs of existing conditions at the site and along the street. Provide to scale photo simulations of the proposed development from the perspective of observers along Route 25, including proposed buildings, landscaping, natural vegetation, buffers, screening, signage, access, etc. as may be seen from the street. Discuss potential visual impacts and anticipated changes to community character, its appearance and the general sense-of-place; discuss building heights, project layout, architecture, and expected views from adjacent CORPORATE OFFICE HUDSON VALLEY OFFICE 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD,MELVILLE NY 1 1747-21 BB 156 Route 59 Suite C6 SUFFERN NY 10901 PHDNE (631)427-5665 • FAX (631)427-5620 PHONE (B45)368-1472 • FAX (845)368-1572 The Enclaves Hotel&Restaurant Site Plan&Special Exception Use Permit Preliminary SEQRA Review Page 5 of 7 residential properties. Indicate impact avoidance and/or mitigation methods to mitigate visual and community character impacts. 12. Cultural Resources: Discuss the existing historic nature of the site, whether there are Federal or State Register of Historic Places or Federal or State Register-eligible structures or landmarks on or adjacent to the site and indicate if the subject property is within a New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation ("OPRHP") archaeologically sensitive area. Provide past historic and archaeological investigation reports, as well as any correspondence from the OPRHP in this regard. If the site is in a locally designated historic district or the site or existing buildings have been designated as local historic or cultural resources, indicate same. 13. Noise: Describe existing ambient noise sources on or adjacent to the site and sensitive noise receptors in the area. Identify significant future sources of noise on the property (e.g., outdoor music), indicate anticipated days and times noise/music will be generated (e.g., "curfew/closure"times, consistency with Town noise ordinance, etc.) and assess the potential noise impacts on adjacent residences or other sensitive noise receptors in close proximity to the site. Provide impact avoidance and mitigation strategies to reduce noise if applicable. Discuss temporary noise generation during construction and any applicable mitigation approaches to be employed. 14. Community Services: List/describe affected community service providers/service districts and contact providers by letter to request input about the project; specifically provide information on the current status of the following public/community services that serve the subject site: police department, fire department, rescue, ambulance corps, drinking water provider, garbage collection and disposal, and energy (electric and natural gas or fuel oil). Since the proposed project doesn't involve new residential uses and will not increase student enrollment, evaluation of impacts to the local school district is not warranted. a. Discuss potential for impact on community services and utilities identified based on input received, available online information and assessment of demand for services. b. Indicate existing water use and provide projections of anticipated demand for the hotel, restaurant and irrigation of site landscaping to compare and contrast the changes in use. Review Suffolk County Water Authority's August 1, 2017 comments to the Zoning Board of Appeals, address the SCWA's recommendations and determine if significant water supply impacts can be expected and identify appropriate approaches to reducing impacts. c. Provide details regarding the proposed on-site advanced sewage treatment facility including type and level of treatment (typical nitrate effluent concentrations, etc.) and facility capacity and whether the facility is a SCDHS-approved technology. Identify any existing public or private wells that are near the proposed sanitary system that may be affected by discharges. d. Identify possible impact avoidance and mitigation techniques including but not limited to water and/or energy conservation to alleviate utility demands and consumption. CORPORATE OFFICE HUDSON VALLEY OFFICE 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD,MELVILLE.NY 1 1747-2188 156 Route 59 Suite C6 SUFFERN,NY 10901 PHONE (631)427-5665 • FAX (631)427-5620 PHONE (645)366-1472 • FAX (645)366-1572 r The Enclaves Hotel &Restaurant Site Plan&Special Exception Use Permit Preliminary SEQRA Review Page 6 of 7 15. Traffic&Parking: A traffic study should be prepared that includes the following: a. A field inventory of existing roadway features including geometry, lane widths, traffic control, pavement markings and parking restrictions. b. Analyses of the most recent three-years of available accident data from New York State Department of Transportation ("NYSDOT") for the study intersections and adjacent roadways. c. At a minimum, collect intersection turning movement counts during the weekday AM (7-9), weekday PM (4-6) and Saturday midday (11AM-2PM) at the intersection of Main Road (NYS Route 25) and Boisseau Avenue. Install an Automatic Traffic Recorder(ATR) machine on NYS Route 25 in the vicinity of the site to collect hourly and daily volumes to supplement the turning movement counts. d. Identify Other Planned Developments in the nearby area that may affect the study intersection. e. Develop future"No Build"volumes for the study intersection. f. Perform trip generation calculations for the proposed restaurant and hotel using statistical data contained in ITE Trip Generation, 9`h Edition or related data from other acceptable sources. g. Develop future"Build" volumes for the study intersection and the site access. h. Conduct capacity analyses at the study intersection and site access. The analyses shall be completed for "Existing," "No Build," and "Build Condition," for weekday AM and PM and Saturday midday peak hours. i. Identify traffic impacts associated with the proposed restaurant and hotel and provide mitigation measures if necessary. j. Review the site layout for on-site traffic circulation and parking adequacy. k. Prepare a detailed report containing text, tables, and graphics for submission to the Town of Southold. 16. Summary: The Supplemental EAF should provide a summary of all proposed mitigations provided in the document. Part 1 Long Environmental Assessment Form Updates Based on NP&V's review of the revised Part 1 LEAF, the following few minor corrections are should be provided to the EAF Part 1 to ensure that adequate information is included. 1. P.2(B), Approvals: The response indicates the agency from which an approval is required but doesn't indicate what type of approval is being requested. For example: o Planning Board, the approval is Site Plan approval; o Zoning Board, the approval is a Special Permit (and zoning variances if any are required) o SCDHS - sewage treatment approval; o SCWA -water service connection; o NYSDEC - sewage discharge permit, and if necessary, SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity o NYSDOT- access/curb cut/work permit; CORPORATE OFFICE HUDSON VALLEY OFFICE 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD,MELVILLE NY 1 1747-2166 156 Route 59,Suite C6,SUFFERN,NY 10901 PHONE (631)427-5665 • FAx (631)427-5620 PHONE (645)366-1472 • Fax (645)366-1572 The Enclaves Hotel &Restaurant Site Plan&Special Exception Use Permit Preliminary SEQRA Review Page 7 of 7 2. For any questions that do not apply, suggest indicating N/A or similar to make it clear that the question was considered and form is not incomplete. 3. Page 5, D.1(c)II - regarding water purveyor and the answer provided ("Distribution Area 30) small issue but should add"Suffolk County Water Authority" 4. Page 8, D.2(r)ii, proposals for on-site minimization, recycling, or reuse of materials to avoid disposal of solid waste should be answered. If nothing is proposed should say none proposed but typically municipalities have regulations regarding recycling and in regard to demolition and construction wastes,these materials are often recycled or reused The applicant is requested to prepare the above requested Expanded Environmental Assessment Report and submit it to the Board and our office for review. We are happy to discuss any questions from the applicant if the Board would like us to have direct communications with the Applicant and their professionals. Carrie O'Farrell,AICP Senior Partner NELSON, POPE &VOORHIS, LLC ENVIRONMENTAL • PLANNING • CONSULTING Long Island Office: 5572 Walt Whitman Road Melville,NY 111747 ph: (631)427-5665 ext.214 cofarrell@nelsonpopevoorhis.com CORPORATE OFFICE HUDSON VALLEY OFFICE 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD MELVILLE,NY 1 1747-21 BS 156 Route 59,Suite C6 SUFFERN NY 10901 PHONE (631)427-5665 • FAX (631)427-5620 PHONE (B45)3BB-1472 • FAX (845)369-1572 NELSON, POPE VOORHIS, LLC ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CONSULTING vvww nelsonpopevoorhls corn July 5, 2017 Zoning Board of Appeals c/o Ms. Kim E. Fuentes, Board Assistant Town of Southold 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 RE: Proposal for Environmental Review Special Exceptions (Special Use Permit) The Enclaves (56655 Main Rd., Southold) Dear Ms. Fuentes: Pursuant to the 2017 on-call contract for State Environmental Quality Review Act(SEQRA) review of Special Exception Applications, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC (NP&V) is pleased to submit the accompanying scope of services and budget to the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals for the above listed application. I. SEQRA REVIEW SERVICES Task 1: Initial Application Review To begin the SEQRA review, the NP&V team will review in detail, the proposed plans and application materials, Environmental Assessment Form (EAF), Part I, and associated mapping and project description for accuracy and completeness. If the Part I EAF requires corrections,NP&V will alert the applicant in writing as to the necessary changes. Fee: $1,500 Task 2: SEQRA Classification, Coordination &z Administration Determine the SEQRA classification of the action, list of involved agencies and need for coordinated review for the action. Prepare necessary resolution(s), administrative notices and filings pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617 requirements. Fee: $1,500 Task 3: Prepare EAF Part 2 NP&V will perform a comprehensive technical assessment/substantive review of the applicant's proposed project to determine the potential areas of impact, and prepare a Part II EAF. Fee: $500 CORPORATE OFFICE HUDSON VALLEY OFFICE 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD,MELVILLE,NY 1 1747-21 BE 156 Route 59,Suite C6,SUFFERN,NY 10901 PHONE (631)427-5665 • FAX (631)427-5620 PHONE (B45)3BB-1472 • FAX (B45)36B-1572 t The Enclaves 56655 Main Rd.,Southold SEQRA Review-Special Exception Application Task 4: Technical Analysis and Recommendations NP&V will coordinate with the Board,the ZBA attorney,Town technical staff,and other involved agencies with permitting authority to discuss the details of the proposed project, and discuss concerns and assist in identification of necessary analysis and mitigation options, as necessary. Based on the input received, and NP&V team's professional review of the project, NP&V will prepare Technical Environmental Planning Analysis to review the overall project and provide information to be used in rendering a determination of significance. The Analysis will include an overview of environmental and planning issues with emphasis on those that are determined to be important based on the tasks above, and will include recommendations/finding on potential impacts that have been identified as moderate to large. If necessary, a comment letter and/or recommendations for requests for additional information from the applicant will be prepared in letter form. Based on the content of information resubmitted by the applicant, additional follow up may be necessary to address any open issues of the Board, involved agencies or professional staff. Fee: Time Rates Budget: $5,000 Task 5: EAF Part 3 and SEQRA Determination of Significance Based on the SEQRA record established in the Tasks above, NP&V will prepare a Part 3 EAF outlining the findings of the SEQRA Review and a SEQRA Determination of Significance. The draft documents will be reviewed and discussed with Board and the ZBA attorney and revised as necessary for finalization. Fee: $1,500 Task 5: Meetings/Public Hearings (If Requested) It is anticipated that several public hearings will be conducted. In addition to public meetings, a number of meetings may be necessary between the Town and the applicant, as well as meetings with local community to discuss potential concerns and resolve issues. The project manager, traffic engineer and civil engineers will be available to attend works sessions and public hearings, as requested. Preparation and attendance at these meetings will be billed on a time rate basis. Fee: Time Rates Budget: $2,500 W ��19Ilf V 'a LLC ENVtFt�ENTAL-FLANNI IG-CCNRA.,"N,G The Enclaves 56655 Main Rd.,Southold SEQRA Review-Special Exception Application Based on the scope of services and budget identified herein, it is suggested that the Zoning Board of Appeals request for the applicant to submit a deposit of$12,500 to be held in escrow for the review of the application. We will commence work upon receipt of written authorization from the Town and look forward to working with the Board on the review of this application. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this proposal, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours truly, NELSON,POPE&VOORHIS,LLC RAUl Carrie L. O'Farrell, AICP Senior Partner/Division Manager NEL50N Ft'>"=e VOQAa LL o+NIFomvtENTPL•Pir1N,4i'PEo•CONS"LTNG .u`-v�s.. I,r� Y ' _ NELSON, POPE 6 VOORHIS, LLC I,iI/`� ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CONSULTING www.nelsonpopevoorhls com July 5, 2017 Zoning Board of Appeals c/o Ms. Kim E. Fuentes, Board Assistant Town of Southold 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 RE: Proposal for Environmental Review Special Exceptions (Special Use Permit) The Enclaves (56655 Main Rd., Southold) Dear Ms. Fuentes: Pursuant to the 2017 on-call contract for State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) review of Special Exception Applications, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC (NP&V) is pleased to submit the accompanying scope of services and budget to the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals for the above listed application. I. SEQRA REVIEW SERVICES Task 1: Initial Application Review To begin the SEQRA review, the NP&V team will review in detail, the proposed plans and application materials, Environmental Assessment Form (EAF), Part I, and associated mapping and project description for accuracy and completeness. If the Part I EAF requires corrections,NP&V will alert the applicant in writing as to the necessary changes. Fee: $1,500 Task 2: SEQRA Classification, Coordination &Administration Determine the SEQRA classification of the action, list of involved agencies and need for coordinated review for the action. Prepare necessary resolution(s), administrative notices and filings pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617 requirements. Fee: $1,500 Task 3: Prepare EAF Part 2 NP&V will perform a comprehensive technical assessment/substantive review of the applicant's proposed project to determine the potential areas of impact, and prepare a Part II EAF. Fee: $500 CORPORATE OFFICE HUDSON VALLEY OFFICE 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD,MELVILLE NY 1 1747-21 BE 156 Route 59,Suite C6 SUFFERN,NY 10901 PHONE (631)427-5665 • FAX (631)427-5620 PHONE (1345)368-1472 • FAX (845)368-1572 /f4 t\ �t } The Enclaves 56655 Main Rd.,Southold SEQRA Review-Special Exception Application Task 4: Technical Analysis and Recommendations NP&V will coordinate with the Board,the ZBA attorney,Town technical staff,and other involved agencies with permitting authority to discuss the details of the proposed project, and discuss concerns and assist in identification of necessary analysis and mitigation options, as necessary. Based on the input received, and NP&V team's professional review of the project, NP&V will prepare Technical Environmental Planning Analysis to review the overall project and provide information to be used in rendering a determination of significance. The Analysis will include an overview of environmental and planning issues with emphasis on those that are determined to be important based on the tasks above, and will include recommendations/finding on potential impacts that have been identified as moderate to large. If necessary, a comment letter and/or recommendations for requests for additional information from the applicant will be prepared in letter form. Based on the content of information resubmitted by the applicant, additional follow up may be necessary to address any open issues of the Board, involved agencies or professional staff. Fee: Time Rates Budget: $5,000 Task 5: EAF Part 3 and SEQRA Determination of Significance Based on the SEQRA record established in the Tasks above, NP&V will prepare a Part 3 EAF outlining the findings of the SEQRA Review and a SEQRA Determination of Significance. The draft documents will be reviewed and discussed with Board and the ZBA attorney and revised as necessary for finalization. Fee: $1,500 Task 5: Meetings/Public Hearings (If Requested) It is anticipated that several public hearings will be conducted. In addition to public meetings, a number of meetings may be necessary between the Town and the applicant, as well as meetings with local community to discuss potential concerns and resolve issues. The project manager, traffic engineer and civil engineers will be available to attend works sessions and public hearings, as requested. Preparation and attendance at these meetings will be billed on a time rate basis. Fee: Time Rates Budget: $2,500 NELSON PCPe G LLC ENVIr'"ttXWSNTAL PLANN,hYG.CANS"TING f r The Enclaves 56655 Main Rd.,Southold SEQRA Review-Special Exception Application Based on the scope of services and budget identified herein, it is suggested that the Zoning Board of Appeals request for the applicant to submit a deposit of$12,500 to be held in escrow for the review of the application. We will commence work upon receipt of written authorization from the Town and look forward to working with the Board on the review of this application. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this proposal, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours truly, NELSON,POPE&VOORHIS,LLC Carrie L. O'Farrell, AICP Senior Partner/Division Manager M-LSON PCRE s vacx-+%u.c ENViP,a,MENTAL•PLANNING•(:: 9 T� SUBSOIL liUVESTIGATIORIS 800L MHONAIM.�CS 4; < < 3770 MERRICK ROAD o SEAFORD, L I -NEW Y'OR1 1-1783 i (5161 221-2333 o FAX (516) 221-0254 M TMT V X OCT 0 ,6 2017 January 4, 2017 BY--------------- Andrew V. Giambertone&Assocs. Re: Proposed Hotel 62 Elm Street Route 25 Huntington,NY 11743 So*old,NY Att: Ernesto Silva Out,Job#16-,805 Gentlemen: Forwarded herewith are the results of the borings drilled at thle above referenced site. The purpose of the subsurffice investigation was to determine!the nature and-extent of the underlying soil deposits and determine the structural engineeting characteristics of the soil at the site for I-he proposed 2 story hotel. Seven(7)test"borings were drilled at,the above referenced site at the locations shown on our drawing. Six(6)test borings were drilled to a depth of 27 feet each and one(1) boring was,drill6d to a depth of 52 feet. The borings were drilled using truck mounted drilling equipment and advanced using hollow stem auger casino,. A 2" diameter,2'0"long split spoon sampler was advanced into the subsurface by the use of a CME automatic 140 lb.trip hammer with a 30" drop. From the drops of the hammer,blow counts required to advance the split spoon sampler over each 6"intervals were recorded and is shown on the boring logs. Continuous split spoon samples were taken for the top 6 to 12 feet then every 5 feet thereafter to the final depth of the borings. A written description of the recovered soil samples per our geologist's visual identification of same is also presented on the logs, The CME automatic hammer operates with an efficiency of approximately 90%. The original conventional use of rope,tathead and drop weight, oh the other hand, operates with an efficiency of approximately 60%. As a consequenceorder standard penetration test results obtained using the CME auto-hammer are on the of two-thirds the value that would have been obtained had the original rope and cat ad method been used. This is sigifficant if you are using design charts for soil strength pdrameters based on historical data associated with the rope and cathead method. If so, you should adjust our data accordingly. TEST BORINGS*GROUND'WATER DETERMINATIONS -FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS •HOLLOW STEM AUGER BORINGS LABORATORY ANALYSES-CONTROLLED LANDFILL,DIAMOND CORE.DRILLIFVG -SAND&GRAVEL PROSPECTING BEARING VALUES-WELL POINT INSTALLATIONS-ENGtNEERING,SUPEI4VISION -PERCOLATION TESTS Ir SANITARY INVESTIGATIONS-UNDISTURBED SAMPLING -TEST PITS -TOP SOIL ANALYSES 3770 MERRIOK ROAD • SEAFORDI L I , NEW YORK 1 17 83 (516) 221-2333 • FAX (516) 221-0254 Andrew V. Giambertone&Assocs. January 4,2017 Att: Ernesto Silva Page 2 I I i I Our investigation revealed that the areas drilled are blanketed by from 1-1/2 to 3 feet of soft loam,underlain, generally,by a moderately dense naturally'bedded coarse,to fine sand with traces of'silt and gravel extending to the deepest depths drilled. Natural ground water was encountered within the deeper borehole (B-4)at a depth of 28'1"below existing grade at the time the work was done. t I All soils below 3 feet will satisfactorily support foundation loads of 2 tons per square foot and exhibit excellent drainage characteristics. i Use of this bearing capacity will produce total settlement of'�4 inch and differential settlement of 1/8 inch with the majority occurring during the construction phase. We recommend densification of the sand by use of a vibratory compactor prior to pouring footing bottoms. We have not been apprised of the finished floor elevations. I owever,we recommend removal of all of the loam and,if needed,be replaced with a supervised controlled fill consisting of clean inorganic granular material,placed in lift not to exceed 12 inches in depth and be compacted,under independent supervision,,to a minimum of 95%of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density at optimum moisture content per ASTM D 1557. Soils to be used for controlled fill shall have fess than 10%passing a#200 sieve with no particle size larger than 2 inches. The natural sand from the site can be used as a controlled fill if needed. Frost penetration in this area is 3 feet and all exterior foundations must have a minimum of c feet of cover. , Liquefaction is nota design consideration. i ! For seismic purposes the site is classified as Site Class"D"per the New York State Building Code. Site coefficient is Fa as atunction of site class and snapped spectral response acceleration at short periods(SS)a is 1.51. Site Coefficient F„ as a function of site class and mapped spectral response acceleration at 1-second period(S j)'is 2.4. Soil samples recovered during drilling operations will be stored in our lab fora period of 30 days after which they will be destroyed. During this period we will deliver these samples to any,prescribed location upon request. t 3770 MERRICK ROAD - SEAFORDJ L I . NEW YORK 11783 FAX, .(5161221-2333 - FA (516) 221'((0254 Andrew V. Giambertone & Assocs. January 4,2017 Att: Ernesto Silva Page 3 If after you examine the enclosed you have any further questi ns,please feel free to call and discuss them,with us. Billing is enclosed. e- trul yours, SOIL E ICS DRILLIN ORP. CV:mlf RVe rn'i c k,P.E, Encls. President'. ClAliBl- RTC NF- & ASS0CIAT1:S AP, (, 11 1 ( I S January 31, 2017 Town of Southold Board of Zoning Appeals 54375 Main Rd. Southold, NY 11971 Re: "The Enclaves". 56655 Main Rd., Southold NY 11791 SCTM #:1000-63-3-15 Attn:Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Dear Chairperson Weisman, In the way 6f a Narrative introduction of our project to you and your Board, I offer the following. On behalf of the Owner,Mr.Jonathan Tibett, 56655 Main St.LLC, I am making application to the Board of Zoning Appeals for the project known as "The Enclaves". This project is proposed on the 6.75 Acre parcel at the subject address, and located in the Hamlet Business (HB) District, of the Town of Southold. As prescribed under Section 28045, subparagraph B. (2), one of the Permitted uses of the property by Special Exception by the Board of Appeals is: Motel and hotel uses as set forth in and regulated by§ 280-35B(4) of the Resort Residential (RR) District, except that minimum lot size shall be three acres. As such eve are making application to your Board for approval of a 22 room Hotel, Outdoor Pool, and required Parking,as well as the development of a 74 Seat Restaurant within the existing late 19`h century home on the Property,which was formerly the"Hedges Bed and Breakfast" Inn. Our Proposal calls for the development of the Restaurant within the confines of the restored and renovated Bed and Breakfast (with minor additions to accommodate the Kitchen area),as well as requisite parking for the restaurant in this area.Then setback some 402 feet from Main Road, secluded behind a hedge line will be the 22 room,Two story Hotel The proposed Hedge line forms a buffer not only between the restaurant and the hotel,but an effective buffer from Main Road as well.The project will focus the development of the parking to the West abutting a Boat Yard and to the North abutting the Long Island Rail Road,respectively. The Outdoor pool activities will be internalized within a courtyard,with the building itself,as well as proposed dense evergreen screening, buffering the project from the 3 residential properties to the East. 62 Elm Street, Huntington, ICY 11.743 Tel: (631)367-0050 o Fax(631)367-6636 o AVG@GiambertoneArchitects.com SCTM#:1000-63-3-15 Page 2 The project is fully compliant to all Zoning Statutes, and in fact is well below the ma.Yimum density for the site. For example,where Maximum Lot Coverage is permitted to be 40% of the Lot Area,we are proposing only 14.13%. In addition where a minimum of 25% of the Lot shall be Landscaped Area,,the are proposing 58.8%, and where 44 rooms are permitted by Zoning Code,we are proposing 22. I would be happy to address any questions you or your Board have at any time, and would hope this proposal meets with your approval. 4Andre-wgiambertone, , mitted, AIA 62 Elm Street, Huntington, NY 11743 Tel: (631)367-0050 ® Fax (631)367-6636 o AVG @GiambertoneArchitects.corn ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK Phone(631)765-1809 (631)765-9069 APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION Application No. Date Filed: TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK: Applicant(s), Andrew V. Glambertone of Parcel Location: House No. 56655 Street Main Road ( Route 25 ) Hamlet Southold Contact phone numbers: (631) 361-0050 SCTM 1000 Section 63 Block 03 Lot(s) 15 Lot Size 6.15 Zone District HB AGR>:5 hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance with the ZONING ORDINANCE,ARTICLE X ,SECTION 280-45,SUBSECTION B(2) for the following uses and purposes: Hotel as shown on the attached survey/site plan drawn to scale.Site Pian review[X J IS or[ ]IS NOT required. A. Statement of Ownership and Interest: 56655 Moln St.LLC c%Jonathan Tbatt® is(are)the owner(s)of property known and referred to as 56655 Main Road ( Route 25 ) ,Southold (House No.,Street,Hamlet) identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000,Section 63 ,Block 03 ,Lot 15 ,and shown on the attached deed. The above-described property was acquired by the owner on August 21,2015 B. The applicant alleges that the approval of this exception would be in harmony with the intent and purpose of said zoning ordinance and that the proposed use conforms to the standards prescribed therefore in said ordinance and would not be detrimental to property or persons in the neighborhood for the following reasons: t1�e) C. The property which is subject of this application is zoned Hamlet Badness and [X]is consistent with the use(s)described in the CO(attach copy),or [ ]is not consistent with the CO being furnished herewith for the following reason(s): [ ] is vacant land. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ss.. STATE OF NEW YORK) (Signature Sworn to before me this alp day of Gli '201? 9a-, Q - ce',q_ (Notary Public) Rita.A. Lep Notary Public-State of New York No.01 LE6075039 Sufroik County My Commission Expires May 27,a l t ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK Phone(631)765-1809 (631)765-9064 APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION Application No. Date Filed: Page 2 General Standards, please answer the following as it pertains to your project: A. The use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts BECAUSE: The proposed use of the property is in compliance with the allowable use in the Hamlet Business District as per Southold Code.The use of property will be contained to the property Itself,adequate screen planting YOU be provided to screen neighboring properties,therefore not effecting the adjacent properties. B. The use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the district wherein the requested use is located or of permitted or legally established uses in adjacent use districts BECAUSE: The proposed use of the property is in compliance with the allowable use in the Hamlet Business District as per Southold Code. C. The safety, the health, the welfare, the comfort, the convenience or the order of the town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location BECAUSE: All activity related to the proposed project will be contained within the property,and the use of the proposed project is In compliance and character of the town therefore not adversely affecting the D. The use will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes and intent of Chapter 280-I42 BECAUSE The proposed use of the property is In compliance with the allowable use in the Hamlet Business District as per Southold Code. E. The use will be compatible with its surroundings and with the character of the neighborhood and of the community in general, particularly with regard to visibility, scale and overall appearance BECAUSE: The proposal consists of keeping the existing residence which is the most prominent and visible structure of the project. As this is an existing structure it doesn't change the visibility,scale and overall appearance as it relates to the neighborhood. F. All proposed structures, equipment, and material sliall be readily accessible for fire and police protection BECAUSE: The proposal is to have two separate access entrances off Main Road which wlll facilitate accessibility by both fire and police protection. G. The proposal shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 236, Stonnwater Management BECAUSE: The applicant will submit a Storm Water Management Control Plan for the approval by the Town of Southold,prior to the commencement of construction. r � APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIMON (For ZBA Reference) Applicant: And'ew V. 61ambertone __ Date Prepared: January 24,2017 I. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: Existing 8'-q" x V-q" shed. II. New Construction Areas(New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: Dimensions of new second floor: 5EE PL.AN5 Dimensions of floor above second level; A,TTAC HE— -WE(� TC? Leight(from finished ground to top of ridge): Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes, please provide height (above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: III. Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes) (attach extra sheet if necessary)- Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: 2 Story single family residence. Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: 2 Story structure to house a restaurant wlth a 14 seat capacity_proposed addition connecting the footprint of an existing shed and the existing house structure IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage(from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: _2,Mq•b7 sq,.ft. Proposed increase of building coverage: 6.25% Square footage of your lot: 2114,202 soft. Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: 11.1 % V. Purpose of New Construction: 2 Story hotel,pool,and It's required parking. VI. Please describe the land contours (flat,slope%,lieavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requireinent(s): ..Existingcontours va�ry_from el. 32 at rear of property to el.26 at front of property. Southern part of the site consists or the ®xiscing House,artveway,garage a minor outbUildirgs a of the house Mz n n1 —1Sreper-ty--Ner-t#i-oR-the-kisuse-ls-wsa6tland Please submit seven (7) photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after stalcing corners for new construction), and pliotos of building area to be altered with yard view. 7/2002; 2/2005; 1/2007 2' QUESTIONNAIRE SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION 1. Has a determination been made regarding Site Plan review? Yes x No If no, please inquiry with the ZETA office and if site plan is required,you may apply to the Planning Dept,at the same time so both applications can be reviewed concurrently. 2. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? Minor Changes proposed to create Plat a. No X Yes please explain on attached sheet.pool terrace area see attached site plan. 3. Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? No a. 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? b. 3.)Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? c. 4.)If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the trustees: and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. 4. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? No 5. Are there any patios,concrete barriers,bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting? Now Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. 6. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? None If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: 7. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking,please apply to the Building Department to obtain copies of them. 8. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? No If yes,please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. 9. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel Existing single family residence with garage,and shed. and the proposed use Restaurant,in existing structure. 9to hotel, .tee:existing single family,proposed same with 6aamge. Dol or other or vacant proposed office with apartments above,etc) aF,aot� uthorized signature and Date BOARD MEMBERS �'� rjF SU(/ Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson 53095 jy®�O 53095 Main Road- P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantests Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Q Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank �O 54375 Main Road at Youngs Avenue George Horning 'p ( g ) Kenneth Schneider �yirou (,� Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APSE?a: l"1 �e� TOWN OF S�AHOLD 3 Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 1,�✓' March 7, 2017 Andrew V. Giambertone, AIA 62 Elm Street Huntington,NY 11743 - RE: Specia E eption for The Enclaves 56655 Main Roa , outhold, SCTM No. 1000-63-3-15 Dear Mr. Giambertone; We are in receipt of your application for Special Exception approval to construct a 22 unit hotel, including guest cottages, upon the above referenced property. The Planning Department has informed us that they requested a Long Environmental Assessment Form, so that sufficient information can be provided for a comprehensive review under SEQR. If you have not yet submitted the completed Long EAF, please promptly do so. Pursuant to Section 280-35 A(4) of the Southold Town Zoning Code,hotels are permitted by Special Exception provided that the following requirements are met: (a) Minimum parcel size shall be five acres. (b) The maximum number of guest units shall be: [1] One unit per 6,000 square feet of land without public water or sewer. [2] One unit per 4,000 square feet of land with public water and sewer. (c)No music, entertainment or loudspeaker system shall be audible from beyond the property line. (d) The maximum size of a guest unit shall be 600 square feet. Please provide us with a written narrative describing how the proposed hotel, known as The Enclaves is consistent with the above outlined requirements, so that we may deem your application complete. Please contact this office if you have any,questions or concerns. Sincere y, Kim E. Fuentes Board Assistant