Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7468SE I i .f I Speck( U�6CCOM i%�- aA 1 ' but I djA ,Q y 1 pfff i 4f r12-4 (o 717�1. t AN • ". ',' 1 s2a z - .(I. -•,. •V 'E. ..,. C� ;(.t 3l. ,• t r s .. . ' - t{^ � r I! t . � `�#^ ti`t _, ACT '`i- • }l. -. . a �. �' {� ` -#_,. ' .a - ... a ,-. r.. �#.�1.(�. � a# AT„ ➢^ ,• t 'j: it' y 4 ct^ - �Y;�7c( `t ZA N CHECK BOXES AS COMPLETED ( ) Tape this form to outsi a n a � ( ) Pull ZBA copy of ND j (D ca a 3 ( ) Check file boxes for pri' .D y n y ( j Assign next number or o j outside of file folder (1) Date stamp entire orifi m -n u37, � � filo number v ? o o o z z ( . ) Mole punch entire arra fD mN ,�-0, x- � Cn (before sending to T.C. z N m Cn ( ) Create new index card m—' CO Q cu ( ) Print contact info &•tai OP (; Co ( ) Prepare transmittal to N ! Sen d.'orig.irial applicatii i 4,. to town Clerk `(D i N.dte w$i&,ftle folder at tape to-in-Si4e-of fi -f -),Copy County Tax Map; i j neighbors and AGJ'ots I ! ! ( Ma-!te 7-copies and pur - ( � Do mailing label I M ' z -SfoP W'd 0vd4i BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ®�r� 53095 Main Road•P.O. Box 1179 Patricia Acampora Southold,NY 11971-0959 � V NO Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento ®��C®U Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gove ECE IV E ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS (9 12.:00im TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DEC - 6// 2021 //� Tel.(631) 765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 0. nwa S uthold Town Clerk FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF DECEMBER 2,2021 ZBA Application No.: #7468SE Applicants/Owners: Vincent Bertault Property Location: 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY SCTM: 1000-26-1-12.2 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions,without further requirements under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated January 12,2021 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION:The relief,permit,or interpretation requested in this application is listed under the Minor Actions exempt list and is not subject to review under Chapter 268. REQUEST MADE BY APPLICANT: The Applicant-Owner requests a Special Exception under Zoning Code Section 280-13(B)(13)to establish an Accessory Apartment in an existing accessory structure. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The subject, 19,905 square feet, .45 acre,non-conforming, irregular-shaped parcel with two front yards, located in the R40 zoning district measures 85.71 feet along Navy Street,then runs 154.15 feet along a residentially developed lot to the east,then runs west 54.53 feet along a second residentially developed lot to the north,then runs north 49.92 feet along the same neighbor,then runs 65.93 feet west along Willow Street(secondary road frontage),then runs 207.7 feet along a third,residentially developed parcel to the west, returning to Navy Street. The property is improved with a two-story,wood-frame, seasonal residence with covered front porch, a wooden shed, a one-and one-half story wooden historic barn, stockade fencing and post&wire fencing as shown on the survey prepared by John T.Metzger,Licensed Surveyor last dated December 3, 2020 and the site plan prepared by Gary R. O'Connor,Architect and dated December 15, 2020 and labeled A-1 through A-3. Page 2,December 2,2021 7468SE,Bertault SCTM No. 1000-26-1-12.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The subject parcel is the beneficiary of ZBA decision#6729 dated April 21,2014 allowing for the relocation of an accessory barn to a non-conforming front yard location, which is partially the subject of the STOP WORK ORDER issued by the Building Department that is currently pending resolution. Currently,the applicant has an open building permit,44419, dated September 23,2019,to relocate an existing historic barn building and a shed as applied for per Landmarks Preservation Commission Certificate of Appropriateness and ZBA approval,with flood permit(Replaces BP#41328). In this application,the applicant now proposes to convert the relocated barn fronting on Willow Street to include a parking garage,workshop and an accessory apartment. The subject property has a Pre-Existing Certificate of Occupancy,Z-30982, dated June 15, 2005 covering a seasonal one-family dwelling and two accessory storage buildings. On August 24, 2021 a STOP WORK ORDER was issued by the Town of Southold Building Department, regarding construction beyond the scope of Building Permit#44198, pending resolution of the ZBA application. The STOP WORK ORDER was in response to excessive excavation at the site including the installation of concrete walls along much of the perimeter of the property and the raising of the relocated barn onto an earthen plinth requiring a proposed concrete ramp to provide vehicular access to the elevated barn on the Willow Street side of an approximately 17% slope Numerous members of the public and immediate neighbors spoke against this application at the hearings and submitted written objections, including adverse impacts to the historic character of the neighborhood based on proposed changes to the storge barn including the design of the fagade and roof line and elevating it on a new raised foundation which are not in compliance with prior HIPC and ZBA approvals, and a proposed ramp/driveway with an approximate 17 degree slope,now required for cars to access the elevated garage,which, in addition to being out of character in the community,poses a potential risk to traffic safety on Willow Street.Additionally, multiple complaints by area residents are on file relative to work performed at the subject premises going back to 2013. The applicant concurrently is seeking relief for area variances under ZBA file#7467 relative to the expansion of a pre-existing,non-code conforming front yard setback for proposed additions and alterations to the as built seasonal one family dwelling to be converted to a year-round principal dwelling, and the request to place a swimming pool in other than a code required rear yard location. As both applications were submitted at the same time and the proposed alterations are intrinsically intertwined the public hearings on each were opened and heard simultaneously. As proof of principal residency,the applicant provided the following documentation: • IRS Tax Form 1040 US Individual Tax Return for 2019. • An affidavit of habitation dated March 10, 2021 declaring the premises known as 95 Navy Street the applicant's principal residence with intent to occupy the accessory dwelling unit while construction occurs at the primary dwelling with future tenancy by an adult family member once additions and alterations of primary dwelling unit is completed. • New York State Driver License with an Orient,NY post office box address. • Notarized affidavit of residence as owner/occupier of 95 Navy Street, Orient NY. • Copy of PSEG Long Island electrical bill for subject residence for service September 10,2020 through November 10, 2020. Page 3,December 2,2021 7468SE,Bertault SCTM No. 1000-26-1-12.2 Both hearings were closed at the October 7, 2021 Regular meeting of the ZBA. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on March 4, 2021; June 3, 2021; and October 7,2021 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and the surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant. In considering this application,the Board has reviewed the code requirements set forth pursuant to Article III, Section 280-13(B)(13) to establish an Accessory Apartment in an Accessory Structure and finds that the applicant does not comply with all the requirements for the reasons noted below: 1. The code requires that accessory apartments in accessory structure contain no less than 450 sq. feet and not exceed 750 square feet of livable floor area all on one floor with only one full bathroom. The owner's original plans for the accessory barn conversion dated 12/15/20 by Gary O. Connor,Architect labeled A-1, A-2 and A-3, included a one car garage and a workshop on the first floor, and an apartment located on both the first and second floors (proposed bedroom and full bathroom open to below)that was calculated by the architect to be a total of 741 square feet, without the inclusion of an open kitchen area measuring proposed at 87.4 square feet.The calculation of total livable floor area was not confirmed by the Building Department because the apartment was proposed on two floors in violation of the code requirements that it be located on one floor. AMENDED PLANS: In response to a discussion with the Board at a public hearing on June 3, 2021 the applicant's architect submitted amended floor plans showing a proposed "L-shaped" one car garage and apartment on the first floor calculated at 478 square feet with one full bathroom and an additional 85.6 square feet of open kitchen space with no separate bedroom and a full open stair leading to a proposed storage area on the second floor. 2. The applicant herein, owns and resides at the property, as documented by copies of a New York State Driver License,PSEG Electric Bill, IRS Tax Form 1040. 3. The occupants of the accessory apartment will NOT be either a family member or a resident who is currently on the Southold Town Affordable Housing Registry, and the occupancy shall not exceed the number of persons permitted, in conformance with the code requirements as set forth in Article III, Section 280-13(B)(13)0, 1-4). As testified by the applicant,he intends to be the occupant of the accessory apartment, as evidenced by copy of the Affidavit of Residency, dated March 10, 2021 where he attests to desire to live in the accessory unit while the primary seasonal residence is renovated and then to later lease the premises to a family member, once a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the primary residence.Moreover,the applicant failed to state the apartment would be the family member's year-round residence, as required by the code, only that the family member would use the apartment when in Southold. 4. The owners' plans comply with the on-site parking requirements which calls for a total of three (3) parking spaces, two for the principal dwelling and one for the accessory apartment. The latest site plan shows two onsite parking spaces, one accessed from Navy Street near the dwelling in the southwest corner of the property and a second proposed space accessed from Willow Street in the northwest corner of the Page 4,December 2,2021 7468SE,Bertault SCTM No. 1000-26-1-12.2 property near the relocated barn. At a public hearing the applicant's agent testified that a parking spot was proposed on the ramp required to provide vehicular access to the one car garage and/or in the garage. 5. Only one accessory apartment will be on the subject property and no Bed and Breakfast facility, as authorized by Section 280-13(B)(14) hereof shall be permitted in or on premises for which an accessory apartment is authorized or exists. 6. This conversion shall be subject to a building permit, inspection by the Building Inspector, and annual renewal of the Certificate of Occupancy. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION DESCRIBED BELOW: Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: 1) The Accessory Apartment,as applied for, is not reasonable in relation to the District in which is located, adjacent use districts, and nearby adjacent residential uses. 2) This Accessory Apartment shall not be in conjunction with the owner's residence in the primary structure, and as proposed will prevent the orderly and reasonable use of districts and adjacent properties. 3) Evidence has been submitted to show that the safety,health,welfare,comfort, convenience,order of the Town would be adversely affected in that the proposed parking spot on the ramp to the garage represents a dangerous situation for passing motorists, pedestrians as well as anyone attempting to use the proposed ramp to enter on to Willow Street. 4)The special exception is authorized under the Zoning Code through the Zoning Board of Appeals as noted herein, and issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy from the Building Inspector is required by code before an Accessory Apartment may be occupied. 5)Adverse conditions were found after considering items listed under Sections 280-142 and 280-143 of the Zoning Code. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Weisman (Chairperson) seconded by Member Lehnert, and duly carried, to DENY a Special Exception Permit as applied for under Zoning Code Section 280-13(B)(13)to establish an Accessory Apartment in an existing accessory structure. Vote of the Board.- Ayes:Members Weisman (Chairperson), Acampora, Dantes, Lehnert and Planamento This Resolution was duly adopted(5-0). Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing d2/ 1 /2021 GARY R. 01CO' c ARCHITECT, AIA 8 CORYELL STREET N .020554 LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 PHONE: 609.397.3635 t p %2- ------ 6 awmi P F 3 9 A3 w r 01 " T I - - - - - - - - - _ - - - w � I 1 � I ACCESSORY APARTMENT LNABLEAREA:479 S.F. VOLUME CLQ. I 8 I ! 4 4 I 2 `� ---- it.i.t NEW KITCHEN UP \ r VOLUME CEILING BELOW � i I 4 I ►n N � I / STORAGE � 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ., NEW 1 CAR GARAGE I b I T ! i I � I f 1 06.10.21 DS MODIFIED PAtT$Y%c&JI.PJP'gXV1 LAYfP. NO. DATE BY ITTR9=''}'tiN r r REVISIONS 9 IT IS THE RESPONSIBLf TTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND COMPARE THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS BEFORE COMMENCING.ACTIMTES,ERRORS, OMMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELYSE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT PROJECT NAME PROPOSED ACCESSORY APARTMENT for BERT DENCE N 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT!NEW YORK'11957 PROPOSED PLANS ILLTr" 12.15.20 rph'615*n Ma 3 Ha 1250 DRAWN DS SCALE:AS SHOWN A-2 BY: I PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE:1/4-=14" PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE:114-=1-.0- BYNE'"ED GRO'C { EXHIB.. IT-C., -,------- - -- ------ -------- NOTE: SITE PLAN INCORPORATES DATAFROM SURVEY PREPARED BY: PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C., WILLOW STREET GARY R. O'CONNOR +1 SOUTHHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - 65.93 g ' r ko F . MARCH 02 2020 ' - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ 1p NOVEMBER 23, 2020 PARKING I �+ - -B.W. 5.2' T.W. 9.2, 8 Co ell Street r1 t SPACE I / i . \ B.W. 5.2 i=; I Lambertville, NJ 08530 ? ` • I / ` Phone: 609.397.3635 NEW WILLOW TREE Vit,; I 1 I J I O TO BE PLANTED II DRIVEWAY PROJECT DATA TAX MAP ID: 1000-26-01-12.2 ( O LOT#2(LOT REFERS TO SUBDIVISION MAP FILED IN SUFFOLK CO. j Up 8 4 O CLERK'S OFFICE. APRIL 19 2005 AS FILE NO. 11245. 4-0 HIGH WD. ( VERTICAL ADDRESS: 95 NAVY STREET ALIGN FRONT OF WALL 7.83' 8'4 PICKET FENCE ORIENT,NEW YORK 11957 WITH FRONT OF BARN T.W. 8.0' B.W. 6.3' EL.-7.83' O ZONING DISTRICT: R-40,RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY AA SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE:AE-6' p FROM FIRM. No.36103CO068H 09.25.2009 Z 35' FRONT YARD SETBACK O ' - - - - EXISTING:ACCESSORY SHED&BARN BLDG. t i I - - - - -7 ! I I EXISTING 1 1/2 STY. FRAME I PROPOSED:-CHANGE OF USE co O I I BARN W/ PROPOSED 478 I -CHANGE USE OF SHED FROM STORAGE TO CABANA. N I SQ. FT. ACCESSORY J -ACCESSORY POOL. APARTMENT& 1 CAR II 4-0HIGH WD. VERTICAL PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE: s GARAGE 4'-0" SHED AND BARN 'RELOCATED PER ZBA FILE:6729 IJ PICKET FENCE 15' FLR. EL.=8.6 20' EL.L ,C � VARIANCES REQUESTED: T.W. 9.2' 6'-0" HIGH HEDGEROW W/ I I B W 7 83' B.W. 4 g' N$ ° -LOCATION OF POOL IN FRONT YARD C HIDDEN WIRE FENCING I �` ' � I EL.=7.83' YI � � 56 O0IIC 3' -_ I �I c� 54.531 ' m DOWN T.W. 9.2' ZONING COMPUTATIONS � I co O; EL.=7.83' SHED 1 i I I �Ip EL.=7.25' W. 7 2, - - ' - _ __, ZONING DISTRICT: R-40 YICO d Iw B.W. 7.2' LOT REQUIREMENTS: REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED U :-- I QIo p IU EL.6.6 MIN. LOT SIZE 40,000 S.F. 19,905 S.F. NO CHANGE r, 00Im 6 IQ U) MIN.LOT WIDTH 150 FT. 104 FT. NO CHANGE UIQ r 10 '� MIN. LOT DEPTH 175 FT. 207 FT. NO CHANGE I Quo PRINCIPAL BUILDING MINIMUM YARD/HT REQUIREMENTS: I w I N REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED w IU O FRONT YARD 35' 1.08' NO CHANGE EL.=7.83' I - == I �I� EL.=7.83'1 SIDE YARD 10'(BOTH 25') 16.6'&55' 16.6'&40.64' I to,0 I REAR YARD 35' 106.5' 90' I MAX HEIGHT 35 FT 21' NO CHANGE L - _ 2112 STY. 2 STY. NO CHANGE 35'REAR YARDS LARGEST FLOOR AREA(INCLUDING COVERED PORCH)- 2,001 S.F. I I NEW IN-GROUND pppL ETBgCK FOR NEW BUILDING AREA: 613 S.F. i 10'X 21' 1 - _ _R PRINCIPAL BLG 1 _ 8.09' FLOOD HAZARD ZONE: AE-ELEVATION-6' EXISTING FLOOR ELEVATION: 6.5' `..>-MIN. 5' 1 I SHED PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION: 8.17' rn 1 ACCESSORY BUILDING(BARN)MINIMUM YARD J HT. REQUIREMENTS: B.W. 7'83' NEW STONE HORIZONTAL REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING STONE I �^- WALL _ ENLARGEMENT TO SIDE YARD ' CURB WALL I "B.W. 4.0',.... T.W. 8 17 o E SIHEIDC ROOM &WETHOUSE DBAR 15 15 &20 NO CHANGE �!�' B.W. 5.2' - REAR YARD 20' N/A NO CHANGE ER .;_ W. 7 TOTAL SIDE YARDS 25 35 NO CHANGE I ..� NEW CABANA AREA. 280 SF. 4-0 HIGP HEDGEROW W/ 1 MAX HEIGHT 2 1 1.5 STY. NO CHANGE I HIDDEN WIRE FENCING � ,'',_;�� M �r � �•_ J FIRST FLOOR ACCESSORY APARTMENT AREA: 478 S.F. _ ;.. _' I GAT TOTAL: 478 S.F. <750 S.F. r„ r%,..•��4 ' RAIN ,..,,�. .. _... ...-. GARDEN DOWN SITE COVERAGE:. EXISTING PROPOSED Y I 8'09' EXISTING DWELLING 950 S.F. 4' I 4.42'± 5' 6' 1 EXISTING COVERED PORCH 210 S.F. Y FR. GAR. ,: EXISTING SHED 184 S.F. EXISTING BARN 930 S.F. T.W. 7.3' I T.W. 7.3' T.W. 6.6' 1 PROPOSED NEW ADDITION 613 S.F. B.W. 5.0' I B.W. 5.25'± B.W. 6.6' 1 PROPOSED COVERED PORCH 228 S.F. =' IPROPOSED POOL 220 S.F. Q B.W. 7.0' DN06 35.66 40.64 1 J PROPOSED SHED ADDITION 96 S.F. r.. UP 6.6' I 0° ' 1 _' TOTAL w m 7.3 < 20' a U) < a 15.66 w I U DWELLLING 950 S.F. 613 S.F. 1,563 S.F. 7.3 �1 = ``<'� I z 0 (a TOTAL BUILDING AREAS 2,274 S.F. 1,157 S.F. 3,431 S.F. T. : ( I o a PROPOSED 1 STY. FRAME 1 'tel z . , a.: ; ...a I - O ALLOWED EXISTING PROPOSED _ I o O ADDITION. 613 SQ. FT. N 1 Y MAX LOT COVERAGE 20% 11.4% 17.2% FR. HSE. < PROPOSED FLR. EL.=8' 1 U :� �-- Lot 1 � PRE-EXISTING NON-CONFORMING LOT PER SECTION 280-124 cyl c - 'F<;°;` T.W..W. 9.0' 0 0 - - - 0 I � - Z I B.W. 7.0' ori T EXISTING 6.6' 10 UTILITY I I 1 w wi J_ -RM.- I EXISTING 1 ax :>. ^ �.� � I o - -1 MECHANICAL/ � p 10 I MUD ROOM. N t- ` 1� 06.10.21 DS MODIFIED PARKING&1 LEVEL APARTMENT LAYOUT EXISTING KITCHEN N I T.W. 9.0' I I NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION LB.W. 7.0 - I _38 h- Ivy _ _ _ n REVISIONS - I 35' FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR P LIJ v I PRINCIPAL BLDG.I IT IS THE RESPONSIBLITIIY OF THE CONTRACTOR �p 4"<<` r •.' I \ - TO VERIFY ALL FIELD COiNDITIONS AND COMPARE 16.7' 7' ti;'t,;'� THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ?( r GARDEN z , BEFORE COMMENCING.jACTIVITES,ERRORS, T.W. 7.3' 14' a ^` , OMMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES 'may' I DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE REPORTED oB.W. 5.3TO THE ARCHITECT PROJECT NAME - - - �,. � (+ � PROPOSED ACCESSORY APARTMENT "rT I EXISTING 2 STY. FRAME HOUSE for PROPOSED FLR.EL.=8') c 0 AVERAGE SET BACK ON NAVY STREET: 17.3' BERTAULT RESIDENCE 16.6' BASED ON PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C., ,Y `} N 0 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 ' PROPOSED COVER D APRIL 25, 2013 1 I PORCH EXPANSION DRAWINGTITLE 228 SQ. FT. COVER SHEET, PROJECT DATA& BUILDING STANDARDS ► T.W. 6.7' PARKING ��.6' . ti B.W. 6.6' B.W. 6.6' DATE 12.15.20 DRAWING N0. 126.23' EL.4.8' SPACE J N up T.W. 6.7' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - j- - - -- - - - - I - - - - - 7.78' B.W. 60' . _ JOB N0. 1950 S82049'40"W 17.86' up S86°18120"=- - - - - - - -- _ _ - EL.6.0' SITE PLAN sCALE: 1"= 10'-0" DRAWN DS SCALE:AS SHOWN A-1 NAVY STREET _ _ _85.71 - - - _ BY: - - - ' REVIEWED s BY: GRO'C a �( fyi COUNTY OF SUFFOLK (� { TO) JA� I� 202�A, 1�131Zt :s OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE Steven Bellone SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE Natalie Wright Department of Commissioner Economic Development and Planning January 12, 2021 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Attn: Leslie Weisman Dear Ms. Weisman: Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A14-14 thru A 14-25 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the following application submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is to be a matter for-local determination as.there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter--community impacts. A decision of local determination should .not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Applicant Municipal File Number Suffolk County Energy Storage II, LLC #7463 Bertault,Vincent #7467 &7468SE Kreger,Michael #7470 Very truly yours, Sarah Lansdale Director of Planning By Christine DeSalvo Theodore R. Klein, Principal Planner TRK/cd Division of Planning&Environment H.LEE DENNISON BLDG ■ 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HWY,11th FI P.O.BOX 6100 HAUPPAUGE,NY 11788-0099 m.(631)853-5191 ^r ^ 1 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REC WED Phone (631) 765-1809 (631) 765-9064 APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT FOR ANDEC 2 12020 ACCESSORY APARTMENT IN AN ACCESSORY BUIL ING -Application-No.: Zoning Beard OfAppeals Date Filed: Applicant(s)Name(s) Vincent Bertault Applicant(s)Address 95 Navy Street, P.O. Box 51, Orient,NY 11957 (House No., Street, Hamlet,Zip Code and mailing address if different from physical address) Applicant(s)phone number(s) 917-667-4166 [x]I/we are the owners of the subject property [] I am the agent for the property owner and my Letter of Authorization and Transactional Disclosure Form is attached. A. Statement of Ownership and Interest• known and referred to as Vincent Bert auIt is(are)the owner(s)of the property - 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY 11957 House No. Street Hamlet Zip Code Identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000,Section 26 Block_01_ Lot(s) 12.2 Lot Sizel9.905 Zone District R40as shown on the attached deed and survey The above-described property was acquired by the owner(s)on 06/28/05 I/we hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a Special Exception Permit pursuant to Section §280-13B(13)of the Zoning Ordinance to establish an accessory apartment in an accessory building as shown on the attached survey/site plan and floor plan(s). B. Project Description: Renovate and change the existing storage use of the existing barn for use as an apartment for the Owner's personal use while renovations are made to the principal dwelling and the principal dwelling is raised to meet FEMA regulations. The barn will be_for_the_use-of-the-O--wner's-mother--in-la-w after-the-Owner-reoccupies-the-completed principal dwelling. C. The applicant alleges that the approval of this special exception would be in harmony with the intent and purpose of said zoning ordinance, and that the proposed use conforms to the standards prescribed therein and would not be detrimental to property or persons in the neighborhood for the following reasons: 1. During renovation of the principal dwelling the proposed apartment will be occupied by Owner. Upon completion of the renovation to the principal dwelling, the Owner's mother in-law will occupy the proposed apartment. It is the intent and purpose of the zoning ordinance to, inter alfa, provide for residences for family members by way of accessory apartments. 2. Beyond the Owner's and the Owner's mother-in-law's personal use of,.the Barn, the Owner is willing to lease the unit to individuals listed on the Town's affordable housing registry and who are eligible for placement. This use is also consistent with the intent and purpose of the zoning code. 3. Ample off-street parking exists, to wit: three spaces. 4. The location ofproposed apartment is as permitted with adequate side yard setbacks and would not interfere with the use of,enjoyment,or privacy of any adjoining parcel. 5. The grant of the special exception will not adversely impact the character of the neighborhood since both the neighborhood is residential and proposed use is residential. Since the lot upon which the accessory apartment would be located is.46 acres,there would be no adverse effect on density. Other lots in the area range from.16 acres to.63 acres and are mostly smaller.Similar accessory apartments are located within Orient and throughout the Town of Southold. 6. There will be noncumulative adverse impacts on the surrounding neighborhood as a result of granting this application,as the prior variance granted by this board with respect to this property is entirely unrelated to this application and did not effect an increase in density. 7. There will be no cumulative adverse impacts on the School District in which the property is located by reason of granting this application as no prior approved application impacted the School District 8. Sufficient off-street parking exists,to wit:at least three spaces. 9. Adequate buffer yards exist as the proposed apartment is located at least 20 feet from adjoining property lot lines. Screening exists by virtue of a view of a row of plantings. 10. The proposed apartment will be accessible to fire and police protection. 11. The proposed apartment otherwise meets the requirements of Southold Zoning Code§280-140. RECEIVED DEC 212020 ZoningBoard Of Appeals RECEIVED al D.The applicant alleges that the following standards prescribed by Section §2813(B)(13)(a)-(k)of the zoning ordinance will be met:a. The accessory apartment will be located in the accessory building. b.--The_owner_o£the_premises_shall_occupy_either_the_existing_single=family_dwelling_or_the accessory apartment in the detached accessory structure as the owners'principal residence.The other dwelling unit shall be occupied by a family member as defined in Section §280-4 of the code or a resident who is currently on Southold Town's Affordable Housing registry and is eligible for placement,evidenced by a written lease, for a term of one or more years. c. The accessory apartment shall contain no less than 450 square feet and does not exceed 750 square feet of livable floor as defined in Section §280-4 of the code. d. The accessory apartment will be located on two floors of the accessory building and will contain only one full bathroom.A variance application to permit such configuration is being submitted simultaneously herewith. e. A minimum of three on-site parking spaces shall be provided as shown on the attached survey. f. Not more than one(1)accessory apartment shall be permitted on this parcel. g. No Bed and Breakfast facilities,as authorized by Section §280-13(B)(14)hereof shall be permitted in or on the premises for which an accessory apartment is authorized or exists. h. The accessory apartment will meet the requirements of a dwelling unit as defined in Section 280-4 of the Zoning Code, i. This conversion shall be subject to a building permit, inspection by the Building Inspector and Renewal of Certificate of Occupancy annually. j. The existing accessory building which is converted to permit this accessory apartment has been in existence and has a valid Certificate of Occupancy issued prior to January I, 2008,and is attached hereto. k. The existing building,together with this accessory apartment,shall comply with all other requirements of Chapter§280 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold. 1. This conversion for the accessory apartment shall comply with all other rules and regulations of the New York State Construction Code and other applicable codes. E.The property which is the subject of this application(check all that apply): [ ]has not changed since the issuance of the attached Certificates of Occupancy [x]has changed or received additional building permits.Certificates of Occupancy for these changes are attached or will be furnished[x]has been the subject of a prior ZB A decisions),co ies are attached Own r Signature COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ss.: STATE OF NEW YORK) Vk Sworn to before me this day of �2GG/�' ,20 a�- (Notary Pu ic) Revised 06/2011 Cheryl Simons Notary Public,state Of New York No 31-4970341 Qualified In Suffolk County Commission Expires February 4,20 RECEIVED QUESTIONNAIRE 1O1tFILING W1T,H-Y_O_UR-ZSA-AP-P-L-ICA-T- A. Is the suliject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? -- Yes x No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? No x Yes please explain on attached sheet. C. 1.)Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? No.- 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? NA 3.)Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? No. 4.)If your property contains wetlands or pond areas,have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? NA Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: and if issued;please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction,at or below five feet above mean sea level? No. E. Are there any patios,concrete barriers,bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting? No. Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? Yes If yes,please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: Barn Restoration in progress G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking,please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? No. If yes,please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. I. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel Existing single family dwelling with storage barn&shed and the proposed use Same with accessory apt.,pool and conversion of frame shed to cabana. .(ex:existing single family,proposed:same with garage,pool or other) 10/9/2020 Authorized signature and Date FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RECEIVED BUILDING DEPARTMENT --7Lf tg 56� Office of the Building Inspect r a Town Hall pE� Southold, N.Y. Zoning Board Of Appeals PRE EXISTING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No Z-30982 Date JUNE 15. 2005 THIS CERTIFIES that the building SEASONAL DWELLING Location of Property 95 NAVY STREET "ORIENT House No. Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 26 Block 1 Lot 12.2 Subdivision Filed ,Map No. Lot No conforms substantially to the Requirements for a Seasonal Dwelling built Prior to: APRIL 9. 1957 pursuant to which CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NUMBER Z-30982 dated JUNE_15 2005 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is SEASONAL ONE FAMILY DWELLING & 2 ACCESSORY STORAGE BUILDINGS* The certificate is issued to JERILYN B. & JOHN H. WOODHOUSE (owners) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N/A PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED N/A *PLEASE SEE ATTACHED INSPECTION REPORT. B in Inspe or Rev. 1/81 ZO/10 39Cd S33Lsnu QnoHinos Ib9999LTS9 9I:11 ITOZ/LZ/TO r LOCATION.- 95 NAVY SHORT (number&strw) �nu RECEIVED SUBDI'VISI ON: t`XAV NO.: LOT(S); �C� NAME OF ONVNFR ���0 OCCUPAN(:Y: (!Ypc) (ow�acr-tenant AD&lrJTED BY: ) Zoning Burd Of APpeals I=W AVAD ABL'E: ACCOMpANYE1)By.. SOURCE OF REQUEST: BUFF.CO.TAX HAPNO.I D-N - 2. ]DATE: May 4, TSIFE Op'CONSTRUCTYON: W=M4W #STOlUES: 2 *EXITS 3 FOUNDATI(!N: Sly S poWS CELLAR: G42A*E%Vlj ITS TOTAL RPACE- OGbYS: IST RY.k:_4 yh*p gLR__2 3RD FLIL BATHROOtiY(S): m TOILET ROOA[(S):_ Murry ROOI►ia � PORCYI TYPE: DECI:,TYPE: FATYO,TYPE: HREE.ZEWAY- FIREPLACE.- GA Gr- DOMES=I30'L'WA1'Llt: YES TYPE HE- A TC W—S—FA—N—C& AIRCONDITYONINC: TYPE HEAT: IM WARA1 AIR: ��— aoTtiv#'ATER: OTHER. ACCESSOJIV STRUCTURES: G_ARAGE,'!WE OF CONST.; STORAGE,TYPE CONST.:_ Z SR'IAInUNx P.Ox18 OL; OTGERs >0 GUEST,TYPE CONST: . -&"G x VIOLATIONS: CIiAPTER 45 fi N.Y.STAT13 UNIFOR,Nd FIRE PREVENTION K BUILDING CODE OOCATION bESCltilr['ION '!•. src. REMARKS: HFDZs z-O -23538 (Am&4LT). Se#31196'L-Q0MM I Cf:OQt R[ ) INSPECTED QY:T % DATE OF INSPECTION: Mdv 12, 2005 TMTE Sl:AR1': rn.an AK .._ END:_ I T 0 w ZO/ZO 39yd S331SWJ. Q-0H.WDS TP9999LTE9 91:TT VIOZ/LZ/TO BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES WITH ONE SET OF APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) Permit#: 39186 Date: 9/15/2014 Permission is hereby granted to: RECEIVED Bertault, Vincent_ 320 E 18th St ------------------- IVedv York NY 10003 — ---- - ----- - - -- - ----- --- - --— -- - -- - --- -- -- Zoning Board Of_q -___-- To: Relocate an existing barn building and shed as applied for per Landmarks Preservation Commission Certificate of Appropriateness and ZBA approval, with flood permit. Two COs required. At premises located at: 95 Navy St., Orient SCTM # 473889 -- -- — Sec/Block/Lot # 26.-1-12.2 ----�---~ry— Pursuant to application dated 10/24/2013 and approved by the Building Inspector. To expire on 3/16/2016. Fees: ACCESSORY $458.80 ACCESSORY $172.00 CO -ACCESSORY BUILDING $50.00 C C_C_R-9 RY_.BUILDING $50.00 1~looyi-I�erii _ $100.00 al: $830. 0 Tiding I spe i�FFo �;; TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ,Y °ro- ;r. BUILDING DEPARTMENT o TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, NY BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES WITH ONE SET OF APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) Permit#: 46037 Date: 4/6/2021 Permission is hereby granted to: Bertault, Vincent PO BOX 51 -----------�_-- -- - _ Orient, NY 11957 --- — —i ----� To: Relocate an existing barn building and shed as applied for per Landmarks Preservation Commission Certificate of Appropriateness and ZBA approval, with flood permit. Two COs required. Replaces BP#44198 At premises located at: 95 Naves, Orient SCTM #473889 Sec/Block/Lot# 26.4-12.2 Pursuant to application dated 4/6/2021_ and approved by the Building Inspector. To expire on 10/612022. Fees- PERMIT RENEWAL $390.40 Total: $390.40 Building Inspector t _ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RECEIVED BUILDING DEPARTMENT ED / TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE ?L(�� sf3 'a SOUTHOLD, NY DEC 2 1 2020 BUILDING PERMIT Zoning Board Of Appeals (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES WITH ONE SET OF APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF-THE WORK AUTHORIZED) " Permit#: 44198 Date: 9123/2019 Permission is hereby granted to: Bertault, Vincent- 320 E 18th St New York, NY 10003 r , To: Ret,®date an existing barn .building and-shed as,applied foe per Landmarks Preservation CQimmission.Certifica#e ofrppropriatenes .and. B�4 approval, with flomd.permit.,T�nio; -00s required. ; Replaces BP1328 _ At premises located at: 95 Navy St., Orient SCTM #473889 Sec/Block/Lot# 26.4-12.2 Pursuant to application dated 9/23/2019 and approved by the Building Inspector. To expire on 3124/2021. Fees: , PERMIT RENEWAL $315.40 Total: $315.40 Building Inspector FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 7� BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: Z-30981 Date: 06/15/05 THIS CERTIFIES that the building FLOOR REPAIRS Location of Property: 95 NAVY STREET ORIENT (HOUSE NO.) (STREET) (HAMLET) County Tax Map No_ 473889 Section 26 Block 1 Lot 12.2 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated JUNE 9, 2005 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 31196-Z dated JUNE 13, 2005 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is FLOOR REPAIRS TO EXISTING SEASONAL DWELLING AS APPLIED FOR & AS PER CERTIFICATION OF LAWRENCE TUTHILL, P E DATED 6/9/05. The certificate is issued to JERILYN B & JOHN WOODHOUSE (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. N/A PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED N/A ttho/ized Signature Rev. 1/81 I SO!/l�o Town Hall Annex Telephone(631)765-1802 54375 Main Road Fax(631)765-9502 P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 0 �� RECEIVED co -AUG 2 4 2021 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS STOP WORK ORDER --- IJ TO: Vincent Bertault P.O. Box 51 Orient, New York 11957 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED TO SUSPEND ALL WORK AT: 95 Naw Street, Orient, New York TAX MAP NUMBER: 1000-26-1-12.2 Pursuant-to'Section 144-8.,of_the Town of Southold, New York, you,are hereby-,- notifedao;irrlmediately suspend-all work-until this order-has been"rescinded. BASIS OF STOPVORK ORDER: Construction boyond scope of BP 44198 issued,-9/23,1261,9. CONDITIONS-UNDER WHICH WORK MAY'BE RESUMED: When the Zoning Board of Appeals and Building Department have issued approvals for alt changes. FAILURE TO REMEDY THE CONDITIONS AFORESAID AND TO COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF LAW MAY CONSTITUTE AN OFFENSE PUNISHABLE BY FINE IMPRI ONM TOR SaTH. DATE: August 24, 2021 o n Jar ki Se 'or uil in In ector IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL TO REMOVE T IS N TI E I H T WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ISSUING AGENCY.,, l y our Uniy,,e NiariellaOstrasld,Chairperson �a�� yew Town Hall Annex -Anne Surchin.Vice Chair i°�� 7�. ✓�'� 4375 Route 25 Josephl���cC.asthy 4 runts co P. O. Box 1179 l SOUabiola Santana • un TH LDuWCU • Southold,NY 11971 Allan-A-Wexler ,< ` kun is ;'4 o Fax: (631) 765-9502 Telephone: (631) 765-1802 Tracey Dwyer,Administrative Assistant a9,�, w-%vw.southoldtownny.gov G ARFS�RVATION ' l June 8, 2021 7- Ms. Leslie Kanes Weisman Chair Zoning Board of Appeals C Cj�� 54375 Main Road P. 0. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms.Weisman and members of the Zoning Board of Appeals, RE: 95 Navy Street, Orient, SCTM #1000-26-1-12.2 Owner: Vincent Bertault I am writing with reference to the Laserfiche number 7468SE available on the ZBA website. The exterior elevations dated 12.15.2020 show two garage doors on the north elevation. As of this writing the HPC has issued a 2014 Certificate of Appropriateness based on the relocation of this historic barn with conditions that include "the proposed relocation of the historic barn and shed, according to the plans submitted,will result in the structures being restored and preserved as is, and the proposed relocation of the barn and shed will afford the applicant the ability to maximize the use of his property while preserving the character of the structures." This 2014 Certificate of Appropriateness was based on October 2013 plans depicting elevations that would preserved facades as is (2013 elevation copy attached). The 12.15.2020 elevations in Laserfiche number 7468SE indicate an intent to seek approval from the Zoning Board for something that will not fulfill the obligation of the HPC 2014 Certificate of Appropriateness. In addition, there is a notation on these plans indicating that the applicant is awaiting approval from the ZBA for a rendering of a Special Exception. It should also be noted that the 12.15.2020 plans are subject to HPC approval. The recent Building Department permit for the 4'wall/retaining wall/fence bypassed the HPC and has resulted in our inability to issue a stop work order for something that was never brought before the HPC. I have come to learn that the Building Department does not issue permits for fences that are 4'or less. Perhaps the form and foundation work involved with the concrete structure being used by this applicant may be why a permit was issued by the Building Department. This does not change the fact that a Certificate of Appropriateness was never sought or given. In question is the height to the peak of this structure. You'll note the elevation indicates the height at the peak as 119'-7" and shows the finish floor at 100'on the Laserfiche number 7468SE. During a 6.7.2021 field inspection, it was discovered that the foundation wall sits at 45" above the natural grade at the front of the building now located at Willow Street, where the only natural grade remains. The height of the roof peak from the natural grade currently measures 23' 5". (Photographs to support these facts are provided here). The maximum height for a lot sized of 19,904 square feet,as indicated that this property is on John Ehler's survey of 11.4.02,the accessory structure should be no greater than 20'for a 15'side yard setback or 22' for a 20' side yard setback. Please note on the 12.15.2020 site plan by Gary O'Connor,both the top of wall and bottom of wall measurements are indicated to be 6'8" illustrating more inaccuracy. (copy attached) Given these circumstances,that this building was raised without the applicant coming before the HPC,and a history of stop work order actions plus the numerous inaccurate figures reported on the site plans, I have no confidence that the HPC 2014 determination has been or will be adhered to or that it will result in the barn being built as presented. This letter is intended to assure you and the members of the ZBA that I am committed to the vision and mission that established the Historic Districts but think it would be fair to all concerned to have complete, current and up-to-date corrected plans prior to further work being done at this property. Thank you,in advance, for your consideration of these issues. Sincerely, Mariella Ostroski, Chair Historic Preservation Commission cc: Anne Surchin,Joe McCarthy, Fabiola Santana,Allan Wexler; Commissioners, HPC Mike Verity, Building Department March 2018 photograph at Willow Street on the original foundation 2020 photographs at Willow Street on raised foundation,still showing natural grade. illustrating natural grade. sirs. sc , c ak Val y Y � t d � � r a y x in �c & d 06.07.2021 Willow Street side of barn with much of the natural 06.07.2021 Measurement of 45"from sill to natural grade at Willow grade disturbed. Street with inset for reading purposes. �' N �} ;' s �7 � ��Y �° x �r ,;4�IfJ i�1�+ r YY�•��'�y� ... I it k Y, msKv' �''.ter;. �a7'€•, e « '�s" � 'J t �JI k � 3/� / PIT r y, e ,/ gp- M , 2 hftp://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/O/doc/999897/Pagel,aspx Elevations on the 10.18.2013 site plan. Gxy R.Or1wr-Alm" 1 V— I X- Zia 0112r jtNF T X, O'S A kkf�l S" .11' 1 , - , j 18"r9l 1�SgUTIM' ', v ' it AT, Nm' FIR" G la .-<.g P WEST �P Rnn-R-2- fX151-MG WN ftQCF-%Aii roM MY-UFATION mg, Rk vi 2-3 E '1�j ng uu 'EA,1 50iTh UWATION NOTE SITE PLANINCORPORATESDATAFROMSURVEYPREPAREDBY PECONIL SURVEYORS PL WILLOW _ STREET GARY R.O'CONNOR SOUTHHOLD NEW YORK 11971 --- EL 4.3' N85°28'30°E 6593' ! ARCHITECT,AIA DECEMBER 12,20 12 --------- _ MARCH 022020 _ EL.S.2' NOVEMBER 232020 I.. JTOTALOFF ---- TW 91 WRIOW TREE TO 1 s1REET;ARgNG_ B.W S.i BLORVELL STREET NY UC GZD5611 REMovED ] i LAMBERTVILLE.NJ 00530 1YTOBEA°PlwNieW D E PHONE 6093973635 �{��- `"ri---..y, IF A J PROJECT DATA f�2 ]I - N TAxMAP IO tco6]Bw 1]} TW BB ��__ I1 CD LOi tl}ItOt DEFERS iO SUBDMSgNMAP FILEDIN SUFFOLN LO (y', BY,fi -' - o CLERKS OFFICE PERIL 19]005 AS:RENO I1<16 N 413HIDH WD ADDRESS 95NAWSTREET VERTCN.bLATFEnCE DRI:NT NEWYORN11957 '' ,nff ISLZQClha2STRILT-.REBIGExMLLO—O BITYAA < LO}AO 0SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE AS 6 Z ' FRID-WAVw]61G}COGERN. RIS1 JS'1RONTYARO6ETBACx_ EEDILFn]M PRWCNALFRAME DOCILWG 41-3—SHEDS E%IBTING 1125TY } CV BARN EL00 CD �• I I BARN Wi PR OSEDt E 1 co CRO.=P5�2•COYCEED PORCH—SNOYA 1 STY FRANEADDI110N ___ 10 PRINCPAJBLOG I:< PAPARTMErvi A° I CHANGE USE OF SHED FROM STORAGE TO CLBAVA PGROVESORYPOOI C VER HIGH WO D VAR AVCE < G FLR EL=B 6'CA � zQ _ EL TICAL 6LATFENCE SxEOANO BMN REIOEATEOPERZdAFILE 67e9 HIDDEN HIRE FENCWGW]�/['.' ° I BW<a N89°56'00 VEXPA45EOx OF EXISIINGNON CONi0P1JINGFPOM�NDSEBALN J j EL°I B] w� Bw]B]--0p E 5453' ORP"Plo nodi° �LL , TW 9Y I. TWN 11FPONTYARD SHED y0 EL°]� EL=]35 ! -' ---- ZONING COMPUTATION:— 0W fiB EL.6 6' :awxGDlsrRlnvi aro I r > IOTPF00 REA gEglln-p Emum pgOQpSED o MW LOTSNE Ex GGGOSf 1"C""' NO CHANGE w I A NW LOTMDTN ISO FT IW Fr NO 111 ON N IJW LOTDEPTH IIS FT EOi FI NO Cv,WME ole EL-783 EL-]01 ON< C2 PRINCIPAL BUILDING MINIMUM YARD I IT REGUIREMENIS CIS 1 TnILL ' rA BEOUREO B2157J64 PROPO5E0 IN..YpRO GSN CHANGE ' ' bO148EYARD IS.OSI 455 166 AHEM « _ REARYNO DS I— C]B ' __ u*RF'N YARDS_ A[EISNT EFT 0 GE !<, I °XZIj GROUND POOL - -- ETBACN FOR PPoN� 1V}STY NO LENGE I T'�'Nt I x6w BLW Wx�AREAEAIxnuOWccmJF f 6' wi AE ELEVATION %ISTINGE—E I J MBW]BS WN.L�O oRIZWiA1 pROPo EOR ps EO BOOR ELEVAHOh 65 NRB WAIL �'B NE BW SITm I ENN—GEMENT TO ACCESSORYBNLOWG(BNNINW11AUIdYN01Hi REOUIRENEViS WI. �l'l.- W7a ry EUGJ—N. SEPIMEA A 10 W 5 Z"^a GtIED O BEDWRE4 E>'IS*1^s E529 pG �O-HION�RHEDGEROWWIJ ks+1 AREA,]ev RI SIOEIARGALS. 5 a OLHNGE HIDDEN EFENCND - ! I I - iOTAIbNE YM05 ]5 A GCHANGE F I _L ., r - vND xpO CCHHNGEI - ' 1 RADI TGAT�j'Z'�" _.,..,'I_!,•„',.-,'I,^„�' FEAR ]) 19H N1551Y N ul4E Y I 1 GARDEN DOWN i�� -�BCs' cTF[Ox TO" 66 I 01NDROORIMN ]AISf•1— FR GAR �';' I I B.BT I:L 11 S. BE v G GsbO TW Z] /-- I EDsiWG DVC0.wG 950 sf y_—_ ]3,46___ TW fib_____ 80.GI _I _ __ C_UlG COVERED PORCH DOBF <BW Sa BW T. I I ExISZWG 5HE0 IMSF <(?4 I ly BW Ya GN ( �O E%ISTwGBNN 9JOSF SF UP` Im PRDPG$EDNELYADOIiIGN01 r� Im I TJ< 9 //11 GPObED COVERED PORCH }itl BE _ 6 In PROPOSEDPOOL X y N Jc_; _]� f$6ff EG SHEDAOGITION }oa 5f N�� PR tofu 2 G\1 - FR HSE ,s eo PeDorno]°i 1_, a so _ 18"�\ N ELuwD YsosF us.F Lot 1 ROP SED FLR EL=e'E O ;iu Ja TOTALBU0.0WGNEAS }}IA S,F 1)5]SF N 4 Y� - ES TW oa f zsT / JJ�j O ,'L�" N x]aT c6YERNE AMovrtD exlsrWG r „Y+;G ' WI X EXL4IBJfll O I� NPRE{XiSNNONONLOIFOONGIOTPERSECNON} BIG 50.1}6 ' QJ ° I o ai BSM. I EBIIQ lIN uDHROIOM] a IN y ` I 3 ITW 9a N E%IS NG%ITLHEN i N O I _ REVISIONS EscR J FRONTYARO6��LK FDR PRINCIPµ9LtlGJ' \ YTS w')-T' ___JH—_ye GARDEN �"�°,Wirp1,�ye'i"NiAnNwax _UP X41 w,usrw rro°° FT}1 s ,A PROPOSED FR - t NiR FLREL•B)usE w�OPpROP05ED ACCESSORY APARTMENT AVERAGE SET BACK ON J a I Q BAS DON PECONIC SURVEYORS,PEC,113 95NMSTREET GRIENi EwvGR%1195] (T5 C.r—16 6-0_ VINCENTBERTAULT O APRIL 25,2013 " (' ET O ' SITE PLAN,PROJECT DATA&ZONING COMPUTATIONS = 12623' EL48'I B aw ss RW 86 v J S62°49'40"W 1786' BEET-S8 a-20w 8571 E 0' _— SITEPLANs-EJ.fro A-1 ISA S8618 '--- om,« DA swE 55ermx, NAVY ST — - — ------------ a: D 3ROR GARY R.O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA 9CORYELLSTREET NY LIC 02055) LAMBERIMLLE,NJ 09530 .9 PHONE 609 397 3635 S 0 — -- - - I I I ISifI.DOfl WF9L'e AREA 1]95F — - -- All- X BEto PNT ]Y — BEtlYIiLtlEN IILLL "�," �� - sn xB�oxElcxr _°k �`"L/�,�_ is_mxEu xFBRM _- -- - - ------ --------- \'`�'�_� Imo` �", r«_-xEiJeEortawr �:.• ��, �'` r �„a'+OELOOR W+aLEax?.imav-' Musa GARAGE __ _____ _______ SL xEAO NEIGH ___ ______ ___ 54NEAD NEIGHi i REVISIONS nv'n�+a PROPOSED ACCESSO'R APARTMENT 1BER7AOLi REBIGENLE 95—S-Ei GRIExI xE'xYGRN„R37 PROPOSED PLANS i A-2 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN ScuE va••,x PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN BGx w•,-0 GARY R.O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA 9 CORYELL STREET NY LIC D2054 LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 PHONE 609 397 3635 �!2BCtFtOOF11Y�7...................... j I I T L I fl TI'T _ f f I'I, I Q T 'T T I T ff f 1 T —'T Fl——P FIM---LIP!IlE 77 ,ELEVATIONFLOOR n, q p -�—;77 7 A, — la 7jr, "'T"I Irk 11111 �11'1 FIE XAN:spaIFY-14-i'll 11KI'll"vi 0 a (I)NORTH ELEVATION—E ll<r 1-0 (2)WEST ELEVATION UALe 11- 1 7opo ADG-Dr q j -T fl, f; Fs REVIS104S 40- 1�77 7 T Ir IN t IK P, " X 3,j PROPOSED ACCESSORY APARTRIENT - 1 i v o112 BERTAM—SIDENCE 7 a 95NAVYSTREET ORIENT WYORK 11957 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-3 TSOUTH ELEVATION—E lf� 11 4 EAST ELEVATION 4 Fuentes, Kim From: Eric Bressler <ebressler@wbglawyers.com> C� J Sent: Thursday,January 21, 2021 3:16 PM To: Fuentes, Kim Cc: Sakarellos, Elizabeth Subject: RE: Bertault -Accessory Apartment Special Exception &Area Variance for Single Family Dwelling -Additional Information Kim: The proposed accessory apartment will be occupied in the first instance by the applicant.As the proposed apartment is not approved, it cannot be registered with the Town's housing registry. If, as, and when the application is approved the applicant's mother-in-law will occupy the apartment and all required paperwork will be submitted to the appropriate agencies. Eric J. Bressler, Esq. Wickham, Bressler&Geasa, P.C. 13015 Main Road P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, New York 11952 631298-8353 631298-8565 (Fax) ebressler@wbglawyers.com This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.This communication may contain material protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination,forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender at 631-298-8353. From: Fuentes, Kim <kimf@southoldtownny.gov> Sent: Friday,January 08, 20213:40 PM To: Eric Bressler<ebressler@wbglawyers.com> Cc:Sakarellos, Elizabeth <elizabeth.sakarellos@town.southold.ny.us> Subject: Bertault-Accessory Apartment Special Exception &Area Variance for Single Family Dwelling-Additional Information fli Cheryl, The board will ask for a copy of the lease agreement (mother-in-law) for the accessory apartment or proof that you have registered with the Town's housing registry. Please submit. Thank you. Kim E. Fuentes Secretary to the Zoning Board of Appeals i Town of Southold 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 631-765-1809, Ex. 5011 E-mail:kimf@southoldtownny aov Mail to:P.O. Box 1179,Southold, NY 11971 11#WW From: Fuentes, Kim Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 10:47 AM To: 'Eric Bressler' Cc: Sakarellos, Elizabeth Subject: Bertault-Accessory Apartment Special Exception &Area Variance for Single Family Dwelling - Request for PDF Hi Cheryl, Please ask Gary O'Connor, the design professional for the Bertault, to email me PDFs of his plans. Thank you. Kim E. Fuentes Secretary to the Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 631-765-1809, Ex. 5011 E-mail:kimf@southoldtownny aov Mail to:P.O. Box 1179,Southold, NY 11971 From: Eric Bressler [ma ilto:ebressler@wbglawyers.com] Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 2:54 PM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: Variance appl. part 1 Eric J. Bressler, Esq. Wickham, Bressler& Geasa, P.C. 13015 Main Road P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, New York 11952 631298-8353 631298-8565 (Fax) ebressler@wbglawyers.com 2 ,92�. ® Department of the-Treasury-Internal Revenue Service (99) 1900 �,U S Individual Income Tax Return �1 OMB'No.1545-OQ74 IRS Use Only-Do not write orstspfe'inlMsspace. t=iling Status Single Married filing-jointly ❑ Mamed4iling separately(MFS) ❑ Head of>househ6ld(HOH) '❑ Qualifying widow(er)'(QW) Check only If you checked the MFS box,enter the name of spouse.If you checked the HOH or OW box,enter the child'sname if the-qualifying gelson'is one box. a child but,not your,dependent ► - Your first name and middle Initial Lastnaime ;Your aoclal sepu�ty number VINCENT D. _ B 9 P-TAft,T If joint return,spouse's•fi'rst;name and middle In dial Las;name Sp,'ousg'g socia]securffy number Hom"ddress(number andstreet),-If you have'a P.O.,W)C,,see instructions. _ �Apl. Prds(dent(af•ElecllorrCampaigrtrfksij(al, Ig95 'NAVY $3T`REIT' _ - - - -_ jbin$y wan 33toreiothis•�od: sfruchorts).. LtiecTtin�,aJio}tlielbieynljnntchan9e•Yoor City,,towri or post offca,,state,and ZIP ood'e,.tf you hivd'a f6reigp address,also complete"sWacde'deloW §e$id- ORTENT :NY- 115-57 _ 1a�pChjndr [J YOU,Qsportse Foreign country came Korefgtrprovinceistafe/county' Foreign pbstal>atie 1t more tT rifouGdederjdents, see ifl§l;uctions and 4here"l►❑ Standard Someone can claim.: ❑ you as a dependant - ❑ your-spouse,as a•depe6d6rit Dedudtforl ❑ Spouse'itemizes on a separate return'or you were a duat,�status alien Age/Blindness You: ❑Were bom before January 2,19-55- ❑Are blind, Spouse: ❑_Was tPrrn beforeJalurary�.1955 :❑ fs,blirld- 1ifquallII63 iorlsteinstrupllohsl: Dependents(see:instrurtjons): (2y Sacial sectfrity number (3)'Relatfoitslilptoyba l4) Lastname ,QillifJtax creBit Rredltfurath_@td@penitents (1),,Firstme na _ _ ❑ ,a 1 -Wgpo ,salariestfrpsrdtc.Affach;pgrm(syW=2 ' ja trod ^tea Tax,exerrtpklnteresf. �._., b Ta)i bre interest•Attactl°Sctr.;Brif;Cequl 26: �. �Ja t)uaiftied•divTdenri's 3a b,•prdtnafydiuldends.:AltabTtScb, iI'M900 3b._: $t(indard ti T@lctife amou�L . . . . . . - tyeduction-for- -4•a IPtA•dlstr"ibutiori§. 4a__ _ - - ." gla or Mamad c Fep tons and>annuRTe3 c d Taxable amounh y][ng Separately, _6b 3122ob' as Stfojaisecurity-bengfits . 5a b Taxabjeremount, •• arrled Lling fi Capital,gain or=(ods):Attabh SchpoUte'D if required.If n6t rociolred,check'lt@re• ''D �'- il'othW or Oualifying - yf.0w(er) 7a Cltherincome=tfbtn&6heduie)•�line�' t 6• Add1ines 1,2b,3b;4t%4d,5br j%iakgd 7a.`bis-is yourr tcta6lndomo x ^ 'h6osehold, ,• Ad�trstmetifs.fo;Ufdt"e from hedtA, ,Sp •ug ,bne'22 $118,35,q ► I{ iib.. - y�' +.fnyou checked b utitracf lino Sa from Iine•7b,This is your adjusted yCoss jncgme1. ficx udder 9 Standard�ieducttdri br t�errdteLd dodilctfons,(rrbfdScfledUlo:A) , ndsrd I flSarioti, yo_ Qualified,,basiness-i'ntoffftdeduotlgtf•'AttachiForm S9Wdrf=gffi WWA I °:,6�e instructions.- r 11a' 1.1a %Sad lines 9 and 1t). . � • - - - •y 4 b ,Taiiabfa lricome,-Subtract fine V a-from im_e,8b.if z6rQ or less,enter - _ Foir@ 1049129,1-9y for D1sct6syl'g,PiiVacy Act;and PageIrwork'Reductioh Act Notice,see separate lhstruotions: RECEIVED DEC 2 12020 _70fling Board Of Appeals v F X,w,t , l. ....���.. �, ,:S,.„„��°;,`-�,: �� ''� a a�6�,..,� s, �F�fw •- �,F „yP ';. 3a;�, off. 'r✓� y �, �.i��1 ..� ,fir ✓;�.ca'sv� ,y; ri; �*�. :;.�� ?r ��,w � � �yh � ,�,,, r,��i'drn�ss�.a,�r�°.���.;,:z�xzY�w:mrda�c e, w..�.1„� � ,.., 1211112020 Co plint;� :2f12E��. �� "`� .Ccr`istr�cticr� cutsid .�, U1��1F�UtJIJ ac .. 10/14/2020 Application : ADDITION/,.. 8 ertault,'Vincent sd&alt& isp needs dis PENDING 8/20/2020P „ w813112020 Complaint#:2020- PROHIBIT.. Bartault,yirrcent �N running ureter into town drain ,.. CLOSED 311612010 Complaint :2020 MI CELLA— 8erta.ultg Vincent Significant trenching being do CLOSED a_ 111201 „A.. r, ''?22?X2020 .u, _ cmlintt2010q . NSJ. 8_rtslt, LCrBD, M,.MT 0J J1231201J F . . . , Permit#:14193 ACCESSO.. 8ettault,Vincent Reletete an existing barn buil... OPEN 1 30 201 _ ��er rit 4 132 A 8 ' O... Bertault, Vincent Expired Sae BP, 44-198 ReL., EXPIRE 1/2312017 m.., .� 112712017 Complaint#.2017-... UNSAFE . 8edault,Vincent _This office hes received comp.. CLOSED � . ... „ . ' 101612013 ....�w.�101141201 .u.,. Complaint UNSAFE ... Bedault,Vincent,,. , Complaint of the barn being Ll... CLOSED IT 9r16�2014 Permit ;M30M �, C E O.., 8erteult, Vincent expired see 41328 Relocate .,y EXPIRED ' 3prt nilt, '�1�nco t 1a2312f.�1 ;''ia 201 . .,. E�,"+� 1 ,NICE -saa, REA .a#...� Grant in xf ort, _ _ ' 11114/2013 1 V1212013N s Complaint 0:2013-.... 1 b( ` IN ,„ 8ertsult,�ir�cert »Cc�mpleint of brush piled on r,..,. .CLOSED 10/24,12013 .Application : .�� ACCESSO 8ertault,�Vincent Relocate an existing barn buil. . WRITTEN L 0 co m a O M o�o C a En ®�%oF SOUlyol Telephone (631)765-1802 O Town Ha11,53,095 Route 25 Fax (631)765-9562 1 P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 SOUTHOLD TOWN LANDMARK PI+ESkIi*& ION,C011�ilVI�SSI®N, RESOLU rI4N,#6.99.14.1 June 18,2014 ' t, I�EQJVED ` Certifieate;of�Pprotpriateness;:.. DEC C C RE: 95 Navy Street, Orient,SCTM#1000-26-1-12.2 2020 Oevne s;. �ivaeentBestalnit ? ' _ 40rim9 Beard Ofpppeals RESOLUTION: = WH12Et � :95, y. treet,;Orient,NY+is,;on Tow of S.qutl�old;Ne�v Yor ;Stateand , _. . . :, , :,Nataon�.l��egistefs.o�I�istoric•Places•,=;aid- :.{ ,., ,..._,.: . �,..:... . •`a •r, '{ ^` . ry k -' - Y,'.., 1, ,.- `_f ' : .. .a" -i w , . V6�H�1 AS, as set forth in Section56-7 (b)of the Town Law(Landmarks Preservation Code)-. of the Town of Southold,all proposals for material change/alteration must be Fey,eyved spd,granted-4-Certafirate of Appropriaterxess.- Ahe�Soutjsojd,t- . Landmarks Preservation Commission prior to the issuance of a Building.-P,ernit,;, and WHEREAS, an application was submitted to relocate-an existing.accessory,barn-and an- accessory shed on February 28,20,14 and WIO�REAS Commissioners met with the applicant to review the proposed project obi April 15,2014,and WHEREAS, a public hearing for the purpose of considering approval of the proposal was held ,on June 17,2014,,and WHEREAS, the proposed relocation of the historic barn and shed, according to the plans submitted,will result in the structures being restored and preserved as is,and WHEREAS, the proposed relocation_of the barn and shed will afford the applicant the ability . to maximize the use of his property while preserving the'character of the structures,and. WHEREAS, the relationship between the',e4iting barn structure and the main dwelling was, significantly altered-when, pzoperty was previously subdivided with Southold Town Planning Board appioval;`,and -' WHEREAS, there are longstanding precedents for relocating such historic structureaown RECEIVED throughout the Hamlet of Orient and-the Town of Southold, andWHEREAS,. the new front yard locationofthebarn structure(facingWillowStreet)keeping with other propel ies in the s�trrounding aiea;and` lsWHEREAS, the proposed relocation of the barn structure was approved by the Sout Zoning Board of Appeals"(#6719)'on'April+l?;2014,and WHEREAS, the applicant has agreed to make a good faith effort to preserve the property's existing trees and shr t!§,(partidul,rly therholly trees)during the relocation process,and WHEREAS, a letter was submitted to the Landmarks Preservation Commission on July 30, a 2014,by Michael Johnson,of Johnson Tree Co. -Giem-oiatli urig how to-pi=�°Fhct° the willow tree adjacent to the proposed location of the barn structure.The letter will be part of the applicant's final building permit application and,it appears that the project requires no-further review, r` NOW THEREFORE BE IT-RESOLVED,that the Southold Town Landmarks Preservation Comiriis5i�in determines'that'ttie'propo§al as dYitliried in pYans dated-October 7;3;;201 ,'axid£` .r�_ amended•on January 21,2014,on May 2%'-20-14;z464,hit ended' ii Ju1Ye Il `2©14,by-Qary R O'Conner,architect,"meet the criteria for"approval under Section 170-8 (A)of the Southold'gNp : ' Code . y `i BE IT Ft3RTHER''RESOUVED that the+Cornmissi6&n pprovea the request�for'a Certificate of Appropr`late&ss: MOVER:James Grathwohl,Chairman r SECONDER:,tarries=Garretson,-ei�Smmissf 6her AYES: Surchin,Parker,Feiler,Garretson,"Grathwohl NAYES:Harper ABSTAINED:Webb RESULT:APPROVED Please note that any deviation from the approved plans referenced above may require further review from the commission. Signe f Ja es F. Grat ohl, Chairman,Landmarks Preservation Commission'" ' Date:TBD PSEGLONG0 ® � ' ISLA-ND We make things itlO*f0 you. Visit www.pseglirty.com 'CustamertD;N - - _{'{Account -- 8erdice 70;Vincent-tsenault -- -- 95 Navy,St j Orient NY 111957 {k MESSAGE CENTER ACCOUNT SUMMARY Service From Sep 1Oi,2020-.fV"o ']'U, lo'a Your Excellent Credit Rating isapprOdt4led.This is our Previous balance 3f10:5 opportunity to say thank you. "Payment(i)Received,Though 101/06/ 0- 3 ,5 Payments are accepted.at-our Oustomer-Service Centers 'Thank Yout and authotiaed foliations.Closest-ceirterl�117 Doctor's Path, Riverhead, Hours: 8:.30 a.m.t&5:00 p.m.,weekdays =Balance Remaining *36 `(excluding ftolidays).See stub'for more,options. New eh 1`90 2� �36 Please Pay°By bee a,X02-0 $104.36 A 1,.5%fate payrrlpnt1eemlll be appPfled to outstaridift charges if payment is riot received by beclrrnbW4,X020 RECi.IVED 17 096 DEC 2 fl 2020 YOU, ENERIQY USA E pairy_Usage _-Dai 0i!n9 NEXT METER READINC5 Noy20i, 14 kWh a0v-2o_ On or abput 01/1212021 1Vou.19� g kWh, ',Nov-10 .y Average f ally use CONTACT US Wor0jy=itse/d4ysin,paiiod) a'Cus'tohl6r Service+ ...... . .._ ... .. _ .. .. , �. .. xs 46, ... 1-800,-X90-QQ25;�Ea]�afit�l t1-$OO��i�O-008�v . Weekdays 8AM�8PM,Automated,Phone,Servi0es-2417 -1-110 13 ,r3 -14, i-4 9 tb 70 9 •Outages/Emergen les 24/ Text OUT to PSIEGLI,(77.3454)or Call 1-800=490.0075 t4ox Dec,' 4ap Feb Mar Apr May fon lyr AGS .sop Ott, y b1• AVAV4179 4i' 41' Si" b1' 71• xla IE' 78' n, •Nearing/Speech Impaired-M- Devisee Required 2019 laza 1-631- -6fzfifl Curr Bill Vs.4-st year a-Actual Fl atimate Your meter is read every other month.Your daily usage is displayed -Energy Efficiency I Report Theft of,Service monthly for you to compare year`to year. 1-800.692=2526 1=631-755-6871 One kWh-of energy is equal to 1000 watt°hours and will powerz 100 watt . facebook.cornIPSEGLI twitter-;com/PS15GLI light bulb-for70 hours(100 watts x 10 hours=1,000 watt-hours=1 Wh). Weekdays 7AM-11 PM, Sat, Sun MM-6P'M PAGE 1 of 2 CUSTQMER tD:0098.1003-73.9 BILL DA7E'11F11l2020 Please det-ch here and return with'yotir check made payable"to PSEG Long Isfand. ---- ---, LONG CUSTOMER IDr C PSEG ISLAND --¢ —q — *& k,fhmow Afoom Amount true $204.36 Please Pay By bea04,20?0 PAY YOUR WAY, 2417 We offer a variety of methods that make it easy to Errorosietl,,. .. pay your bill.See reverse-side for more information. _ A O Or PSEG Long Island Vincent Bertault P0'80x 90,50. 95 Navy St Hicksville NY 11802-9050 Orient NY 11957 009810037341000316820436Y20436Y 00 P SEG LONG – —- W,..k,thinygwnhfnTAND Ctfstomer'ID:( Account#-' Meter#983QQ501 Usage Reading, o Actual reading on 11/1012020 07.105 Actual reading on,09110/2020 -06865 Electricity0sed1n,61 day(s) 840 KWH DETAILS OF CURRENT ENERGY CHARGES BILL DEFINITIONS Fate 1$0-Resident'ra1,.General Use IWO-�tu��te`clavi=,�nery��orist�me�if�;uQ4y,aA$(arr.tort 1,00wbulbs)sre' ' - u'sotTtbrbii;�tip'Ctr•- 48'0/o -`Delivery& Systern Charges $07.4ltiiiih'o�i pdQl�riti-Tie hi�gtie5t amoLt���lopTrt�lY ysed'ira any-#19 itaurduring, The-eoet to deliver efectde tys includes operation and maihtetfanee of The 4itillg py6iadc�,klAf isegl}aTta X0110 watts the electric-system and certain'tTan"sitibn charges of$0,020658lkwh MeleC ISltu tiplielr-doul4its-recordgd}isje to•tolat•usa on meters lhallare, on behalf of the Utility L1ebt_$.ecurliz4on uthority,NP,owner cf �ie-;X. e jw,,-'The mini ixrse. 5uch.transiti0n charges, 04 ,�e��i 'The minimum daily�e>si toua 2417'connection to dierelectrio J systern,- Basic Service: 61 da (s) $ .4200= 25,62 Div $orvide Ad ustm n : ar or t rea�tapplted to y 0alarncwaetual mit enses wh budgeted expenses.creates long-term rateatabilrty First,508,KWH � S.0821 = 42.01 by accounting forunpredictabie-costs,_ttic111'dtng stor" osporise: Next 332 KWH $ .0839 = 2g,85. Distributed,E�lergy Resotirces,(DER)Charge-ihe-costof customer programs suchas energy efficiency and conservation,as,welhas neW technologies and methods Tor,prdducipg and storing energy: 45% Power-Supply Charges $92.27 Reveriue,.Bhse'd P1LOTs(Payrnents Ili 1,1eu of Taxes)-State and local taxes orfublity roenues This does not tnclpde,propertytazes assessed ontthe The cost,of eleotdolty:Includes the purchase of fuel(e;g.oil 2nd gas) etei trlC system whictt.makerip 15%of y9ur bill. used to produce electricity and electricity purchased;directly. Revenue De_coaplfng Adjustment--(charge ortredit applied to balance actual delivdey reveliue with the approved revenues level. 840KWH .109841 = 82.27 Enaa6iazges aneFgy,effi8(endy by,breakiltgutility clepentien,cyonsales-revvnae. NY state At 5sessfft'etit i Asseztmdnurnpoakd 6o sn uuliti8s and cotleciod ipn 7% Taxse &Other Charges $1.4;fit behafof'lneSCatB: Suffgiic•,Prope#y Tax AdjusirttBnt.The amountcb)16geo>b4 P$EGLI"(_rom *Suffolk,Gnu'rlty:cdst4mersrepiespliurtgthe ouergSymE'trtsiLpropetfytaxcs`to-the DER Ciarge$46IfWI-1 ,$ .003826= 3'.21hgrchar,5tai4inOJtirlSdiFudr'QtneGv -orfleredlagalsettiemenldaied lanuaty, Delivery Service Adjustment 1.41' 1124.0. �Sa1e2'�a�-Stagaritl(ariooei sates,rexes. Revenue Decoupling Adjustn1elit NY State Assessment 0�52� oyenue-Based PILOTS 2,54 .'Suffolk Property,Tax Adjustment 4,67' Sales Tax- a/o 4.98 100°/6 Total Charges 204.36 RECEIVED DEC R 2020 Zoning Board Of Appeals PAGE 2 of'2 CUSTOMER 0:'0098-1003-73-4 BILL DATE 1Jf`,112020 Ws Your Hili. Have You-pay is Your OhoiCe. LM us. 6 Online or Phone DirectPay Credit,Card In Person MAIL .y Mail 'Make a payment anytime Automatic payments Pay your bil4with a credit Payments are'accepted Payments to, from a checking or savings from your bank.Skip card online or by phone dt any,customer service PSEG Lorfg Island account with My Account, check'and stamps: (fee may apply). -center or authorized PO Box 9050 by phone or by text. Never worry about locations. Hicksville NY-118R-9,050, due dates. Send correspondence to: www.psegliny.com www.psegliny.corti www.psegliriy.com Locations at PSEG Long,isiand,PO Text PAY PSEGLI(773454) 1=800-490.0025 www.pseglirfy.com Box 9083,Melville,NY 1-800.490.0025 11747-9083 GO PAPERLESS! To sign up visit www.psegliny.com 44,Sl 11 M RN ��'it�._,,sua:� 2 BM.�^ '„,' `a� ,I;T1$f> �oth[iag�e�, �-„3.'`'�'•�,` c •;;`✓���� a= -`:' p;S�=,mss �"* ' a-�"r^-.z`;:"a„ _ e- '-iX2 il ” "➢ -".; -znx:'.`•-ts ",', 67 -.+� '9" a nNPli � _ o uaf", yF�%'r,'.�,' ya•,a$ µ^�k `�F` i3 {�,�M t ^ d ^�'=h&a x, � k"` s} v z" Bill x. � '+.�''''�txre•a'�'k�"'3?' ,.Esq.- q3 4+ �- �, � ,,�.,Aviv -�= ^;,�•.� � � �� �,� . ,. h I2E LVED jq Fall/Winter P_0!2�0 e; =On of Savings ", bard Of A pealsIn this.heating season, rnaQy cf u. V.111�or#tirtume'r,ink �tY-gars;Just tl -in, ° summer, proper-`the rmostat`sattirtgs'can Wp`yo#eantrol 68M cost$ becau'si heating accounts for about fl percent of a typi,dal-hauahold's-energy aa, Set a prograrriMable thermostat for the season--and it does all the:wor,,f�f,Ytou:� '7:TSome`=ieai=mng; Wi-Fi thermostats can eyep are'ate custom settings ed based on,your household. Try a setting o#,68 F duffing hours when yoWra home and,reduce the temperature to 586 F wba'q away and at night. That difference of 10,degreos bver-an eight4lour�pedod could save you upito 10%on heating costs. Another tip: get free warmth during`daylight hours by opening curtains and fillridi�an stih4aain� windows. For even more ways to save,including rebate's on WI-Fi thermostats, visit PSEGLIN'Y.cdmfskVOt OPeV, Time for'Something New Having more time-at home doesn't always mean you have time. Make things easier by getting, your bill in,a new way, Without the paper. Paperless Billing is free and frees-up time by delivering,a POF version right to your inbox.The email even includes a quick summary for when.you don't hava'time to review the bill. It's the same bill with no need to change how you pay.Text PAPERLESS to PSEGLI (773454), visit PSEGLINY/paperless. You can also sign up in our mobile app where you can also pay bills. Download today for i0S and Android. Cash in on Old Appliances After you recycle that bottle from the fridl e,you•may want,to.recycle tha-fridge.An old fridge or freezer in the basement or garage could be,costing you$200'a year 1n•en-ergy costs..Schedule aine rto-aontact pick up of an oral}working r afripfator oIr freezer and we'll sendyau�a$50 check for reoye[Ing.it. You carr also recycle pp•to threw.,TQomolr,contlition- ers or dehumidifiers at the sam0,pigkiap for cr-adits toward.ouronline Efflo'e,rrcy place, S-ctredule online at P�S'E��.1N'� r> s e oney or I!M,6=761��2722. RcV69S6 ECEIVED Heating Season Safety DEC 2 1 202 0 1 Carbon monoxide C g g i Board Of Appeals ( 4�=Ts a,dan eroi�s as prodrred:by fuel-burning ulpm0nt, heating system's and water heaters. fou cannot see orsmell,00,and e)tosure to, - µ� � you stcl€With flu-like"symptoms-and in extreme cases earl,be fatal Have,yout-heatirtg system . ` checked each year and place CO alarms neArbedrboms:New,Yor_RS te,law mgQi es ;. installation.ofi GO alarriis i1i harries, if jrQ'u.suspect CQ e•xposure .go"�outdoaisartd"call 0t1. Assistanoe•for Heiatfrlg C-osts. The dame Energy Assistance,Program (HEAP,)-helps-lnccmorel%g`rble-households-poly-heati- etatad, energy bills. Owners a_rfd rente`rsrmay. qualify-for a HEAP,grant that.does-not ltavet© be paid back Learn.more about HEAP qualifications,and how"to apply at httpa f/otda.ny„gdujRE0. If you, do receive 'HEAP, that also qualifies you for;odjsoftnt.on-every el`ectriobi`ll with•.our Househol`O sista'go Program. To receive-this discount;send,us an email to consu"rnetadvocacyli@pseg.oc� . Rate Options for Eigible Organiz8 ons Additional rate options ate-available for;religious,9rgarilzations,veterarra�organizatirzns and qualified commgnity. residences.Such-organizatlonstay choose Moe billed�on either an :appropriate.reaidential-or non-residential rate, subject to a m nimuh term�#ons year.fxall • 18.00.00-0025 to discuss rate options. - IME IM E EM IM Customer Service Electric Emergencies Payment Options 1-800-490-0025 1-800-490-0075 PSEGLINY.comfwaystopay 8 a.m.-8 p.m.,weekdays 24 hours a day/7 days a week ivlanege.Yaur Account Espanol ® RgEGLINY.com/account 1-800-490-0085 Download Our ®” Free App Energy Savings and igefSates Hearing/Speech scan to download Impaired (TrY) PSEGLINY.com/efficiency 1-631-755-6660 Opties and Dinghies opens in Orient,serving up ar o^lectic menu https://northforker.com/2""')7/opties-and-dinghies-opens-in-orient... RECEVEB qq61s DEC SIZRO EAT Zoning Board Of Appeals Optics and. Dinghies opens in Orient, ----serving up an eclectic menu--- ----------_---- ------ by CYNDI ZAWESKI on JULY 13th,2019 SOCIAL SHARE CHINESE DUMPLINGS,FRENCH CREPES AND GELATO,OPTIES AND DINGHIES IN ORIENT.(CREDIT:CYNDI ZAWESKI) An eclectic menu of Chinese dumplings and French crepes,mixed with the sweet,timelessness of an Orient tradition, Opties and Dinghies has opened on Village Lane,serving a seamless blend of old and new on July Fourth weekend. Owners Vincent Bertault and Claudia Lin are bringing their 12-plus years of culinary experience to the North Fork in the storefront previously leased by Brooklyn-based pie company Four&Twenty Blackbirds,which closed after four seasons last summer. The couple,which has split their time between residences in New York City and Orient for the past 17 years, has served its cuisine at pop-ups in New York City and at high profile events, such as the Hamptons Classic.After dishing out more than 250 crepes in a matter of hours at last year's Oysterponds Historic Society fundraiser, North Fork Fresh,the idea for their first brick-and-mortar location in Orient started taking shape. "It has been a joy working with everyone in this community;" Lin said. "There was a need and we wanted to be here" Lin and Bertault are offering up a wide-ranging menu that is seeped in family heritage and local nostalgia. Both chefs learned traditional methods of cooking from their families.A Brooklyn-native, Lin serves her authentic Chinese pork or vegetable dumplings two ways — 1 of 3 12/22/2020 11:50 AM Opties and Dinghies opens in Orient,serving up a^o^?ectic menu https://northforker.com/2- n'07/opties-and-dinghies-opens-in-orient... EAT DRINK LIVE BREATHE EVENTS PODCASTS VIDEO WEDD Relatcd Content PODCASTS Weekend Podcast: What's happening across the North Fork the week of Dec. 12 EAT The best-things we've eaten-(so far!) in 2019 EAT Barrow Food House, Little Oak and more restaurants now open on the North Fork - RECEIVED DEC 2 1 2020 STAY UP TO• DATE Zoning Board Of Appeals Get the latest North Fork stories, recommendations,and upcoming events right to your inbox with our daily newsletter. EMAIL 2 of 3 12/22/2020 11:50 AM Opties and Dinghies opens in Orient,serving up a^ e^'ectic menu https://northforker.com/2^'"07/opties-and-dinghies-opens-in-orient... EAT DRINK LIVE BREATHE EVENTS PODCASTS VIDEO WEDD EAT EVENTS THE SUFFOLK TIMES DRINK LIVE RIVERHEAD NEWS-REVIEW ABOUT BREATHE SHELTER ISLAND REPORTER TERMS OF USE I PRIVACY POLICY I ACCESSIBILITY SITE MADE IN COLLABORATION WITH CMYK © 2020 TIMES REVIEW MEDIA GROUP ALL RIGHTS RESERVED E ' 5�Appeals 3 of 3 12/22/2020 11:50 AM IIGI.Ll V CU r , DEC Il 2020 0. Zoning Board Of Appeal's APPLICANWOWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of South old's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the Rart of town officers and employees.The purpose of this-form-is-to provide-information-which-can-alert-the town-of possible conflicts of-interest-and-allow it to take whatever action------ - is necessary to avoid same YOUR NAME : Bertault, Vincent (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION:(Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance - x Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plaf-------7 Mooring Other(activity) Special Exception PIanning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest. "Business interest"means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO x If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) _ A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or _ D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted thi ay of ,20 Signature Print Name AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORMThe Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOURNAME : Bressler, Eric J. (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else MentD company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.)TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply)Tax grievance Building Permit Variance X Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion ls Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 21st day,of ecember,20 20 i Signature_ ;j/ _ Print Name Eric J. Bressler Boar-d-of-tonin A eals-A licati Z®20 peals — ---- AUTHORIZATION (Where the Applicant is not the Owner) I, Vincent Bertault residing at 95 Naw Street,Orient,NY 11957 (Print property owner's name) (Mailing Address) do hereby authorize Wickham,Bressler&Geasa,P.C. (Agent) , avrw) S cca.Q s�CcA�}roh to apply for variance(s)/On my behalf from the outhold Zoning,Board of Appeals. (Owner' Si ature) - X�� / (Print Owner's Name) RECEIVED AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT DEC 212020 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS f TOWN OF SOUTHOLDOing Soard Of P,ppeals WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval, use variance,area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239m and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant: Vincent Bertault 2. Address of Applicant: 95 Navy Street,'PO Box 51,Orient,NY 11957 3. Name of Land Owner(if other than Applicant): 4. Address of Land Owner: 95 Naw Street,Orient NY 11957 5. Description of Proposed Project: Change in use from Barn(Storage)to Barn with Accessory Apartment. 6. Location of Property:(road and Tax map number) 95 Navy St. 1000 26 01 12.2 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? { } Yes {x}No 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? { } Yes {x}No 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s)of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff,it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office- (765-1937)or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use the back of this page if there are additional property owners) 10 / 09 / 2020 Signature of Applicant Date Note: 1.The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of landidentified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2.Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration,as part as the overall review of this application. 3.Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. 6X 7.20 Appendix B RECEIVED Short Environrnentat Assessment F �n 17 qi,,q si5 Instructions for Comnletl DEC 212020 Part 1-Project Information. -The applicant or project sponsor is responsible fo Onin 0 e become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. spouses Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Bertault Residence Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 95 Na Street, Orient,NY 1957 - Brief Description of Proposed Action: Proposed accessory apartment in an existing accessory structure. (barn) on 2 floors (special Exception) Proposed additions and alterations to existing single family - dwelling and construction of a swimming pool (variance) Name of Applicant or sponsor: Vincent Bertault Telephone: 1- 917-667-4166 E-Mail: Address: vbertault@yahoo.com 95 Na Street City/PO: Orient State: Zip Code: • P.O Box 51 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, 11957 administrative rule,or regulation? NO YES If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. x 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or fundinfir om any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: Buildings for construction,HPC for certificate of appropriateness x 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? — _5_acres . c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned 05 acres'' or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0 _acres � • 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban ❑Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ®Residential(suburban) ❑ Forest ❑Agriculture ❑ Aquatic 13 Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 4 T , J, 5. Is the proposed action, a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? RECEIVED NO YES N/A . b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? S x 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant ch acte x landscape? r eis i b ilt or n tura) NO YES 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adJ ,2rj�� g i `P �$o mental Area? x If Yes,identify: NO YES 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic x above present levels? NO YES b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? x c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? x 9.Does the proposed'action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: NO YES x 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? PP Y• NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: x 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: Private septic system. x 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? x 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? x If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: x 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: y'❑Shoreline 11 Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands Early mid-success'ional13 Wetland Urban !D Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? NO YES 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? x NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point ornon-point sources? x If Yes, NO ,YES a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑NO El YES x b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ❑NO❑YES Page 2 of 4 pmanagement he proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES her liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)?If Yes,explain purpose and size: X site of the proposed action or an adjoining property bee tiFut o n active or closed NO YES management facility?If Yes,describe: RECEIVED X 17 UtL ?i 2020 site of the proposed action or an adjoining property b ett the subject of remediation ongoing or NO YES for hazardous waste?If Yes,describe: �onmg BoardOAX ppeals "Signature. T THE INtVin fnt PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY r name: ault Date: Part 2-Impact Assessment.The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2.Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur I. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing:a.public/ private water supplies? b. public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance.The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3.For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring,duration, irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude.Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. RECEIVED Iq DEC 2 12020 ZOnItlg ward Of Appeals ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency, Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) y: t P AL •:'S T9Ff qo RECEIVED DEC12 1 2020 STATE OF NEW YORK: LZoning Bcard Of Appeals :ss.. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: VINCENT BERTAULT, residing at 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York 11957, being duly sworn, deposes and says: I am the owner of real property situate at 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York, 11957, SCTM#1000-26-1-12.2 ("Premises") by deed dated June 28, 2005. I have resided at the Premises as my p 'mary residencefor t past ten years. Vin erA Bertault Swon to before me this 9a�' - daofDecember, 2020 Notary Public Cheryl Simons Notary Public,State Of New York No. 31-4970341 Qualified In Suffolk County Commission Expires February 4,20 4 r O -TOWN OF SOU� � OLD PROPE YY 10 00_ 2 �E ®R i o aa�WNER 'STREET, r DIST. 1 J VILLAGE I n o� r j SUB. LOT 1Z ' FORMER OWNER r 1 Z VV 6)oa �1�ui:QIF r ACR.y,5, l s y 6 TYPE OF BUILDING T6u1t RES., 77• �� I SEAS. .VL. FARM :Dec- . CB. MICS. Mkt. .Value LAND IMP: TOTAL REMARKS DATE s, f�o�j 3toar���r 4 2>00 12 5 �/���rl<�, - � / `�. SSP/- I/� �gh -. AGE BUILDING CONDITION i NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE C° Value Per Value FARM Acre U �— Acre ni Tillable T FRONTAGE ON WATER Woodland e� FRONTAGE ON ROAD ' CIA rD Meadowland — DEPTH E House Plot r-++ BULKHEAD I Total I , DOCK if !T J,iS � r �-a{e-•) Y ? nt ?y InY - 3 1{ i 1�j, `!J,�y'�-+.,t tlf✓'` s}t w"( 5ry t���t ' S vy �r�4 ec� HlThti`''c} T S y[ 5- gig 4 - :: a�nnnaannaannnnaaan�nnnna nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnpnnnnnn ` nvnnnnnnnn annnnn nnn nn nnnnn�nnnnnnnnnnn nnn ��i ,, � , �i►,� � yz fanvnnWnnnnnnnnnnnnn nn • 7 � _ � vonaavnnn��aun®na Su r st a�nna an ��n man F, an M aaann��ionan � ��n � nnn,�ann�anv nnn t I ■ Y �rran ��■ : .. aaann��anar�nnnnnn®nv��nn na�lnn®®®®mann= nnn _ nnnnEn_nnnnnnnnnnnnnn�� ann® �MMEMO dnaa - n nnnnn�� �aSEEM! annanaaaan�nMI"- Extensi. MI" Porch IWAGI Breezeway Interior Finish Pre Place - Porch • , r • '.• .• • • d • F,9 7f IDriveway • • Ffl RECEIVED Number of pages -00 "1),11;T,r TORRENS F 530 Serial# DEC S I NZO .,Tff 04-48OS9 Certificate# Zoning Board Of Appeals Prior Ctf.# L---Z Deed/Mortgage Instrument Deed Mortgage Tax Stamp Recording/Filing Stamps 3 1 -FEES Page I Filing Fee alb Mortgage Amt. Handling 5. 00 1. Basic Tax 2. Additional Tax TP-584 Sub Total Notation Spec./Assit. or EA-52 17(County)- Sub'lbtal Spec./Add. EA-5217(State) T91'.MTG.TAX R.P.T.S.A. DualTown Dual County Held for Appointment,— Comm.of Ed. 5. 00 'transfer Tax,,---- Mansio Tax Affidavit Certified Copy The pr perty covered by this mortgage is or wit be improved by a one or two e Reg.Copy family c elling only. Sub Total Other t _S YES_ or NO Grand Total It'NO,see apqropriate tax clause on age# of this instrument. r 4 1 OPP ib—z-tp (DIo District Section Block Lot 0 5 Community eseyktion Fund Real 05025439 :LOOO 02600 0100 012002 Consideration Am ts -�260 00 Property P T Tax Service (RDN A) CPF Tax Due 0.&0 Agency -,PB-JUL-0 Verification Improved Vacant Land 61 Satisfactions/Discharges/Releases List Property Owners Mailing Address RECORD&RETURN TO: - TD 10 TD q4 TD j Tifie Company Information Co.Name W�- 71(le 41 8 Suffolk Count Recording & Endorsement Page This page fornis part orthe attached made by: (SPECIFY TYPE OF INSTRUMENT) The promises licicin is situated in SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK. "0 In the Township or In the VILLAGE or HAMLL—l'of pujuj BOXF.9 6 THRU 8 mus,r BE TYPED Olt PRINTED IN BLACK INK ONLY PRIOR TO RECORDING Olt FILING. (over) Bargain and Sale Deed with Covenants Against Grantor's Acts-Individual or Corporation' CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS 1NS1'RUXIENT-THIS 1NSTRUbIENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY THIS INDENTURE, made the day of June, 2005 BETWEEN JOHN H. WOODHOUSE and JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE, husband and wife, both residing at 2395 Village Lane,PO Box 360, Orient, NY, 11957 party of the first part, RECIEVED J VINCENT BERTAULT' residingat 320 East 18`I' Street, � C 1� t,Ne v York, NY, 1000��� � 12020 • party of the,second part, Zoning Board Of Ani3eals WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of TEN ($10.00) dollars, lawful money of the United States paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, niece or parcel of land,with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being SEE SCHEDULE `A' ANNEXED HERETO BEING AND INTENDED TO BE PART OF THE same premises conveyed to the parties of the first part by deed dated October 5, 1998 recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk on October 19, 1998 in Liber 11923 at page 642. I TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any,of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof. TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been incumbered in any way whatever,except as aforesaid. AND THE party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consideration as a trust fiord to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement,and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for-any other purpose. The word"party"shall be construed as if it read "parties"whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. SCHEDULE "A" ALL THAT CERTAIN plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, known and designated as Lot No. 2 on a certain map entitled, "Map of Subdivision for John H. Woodhouse and Jerilyn B. 'Woodhouse at Orient" and filed in the Office of the Clerk of the County of SLlffolk on April 19, 2005 as Map .No. 11245; said lot being more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Navy Street where the same is intersected by the division line between Lot Nos. 1 and 2 on said map; said point being also distant easterly 126.23 feet from the corner formed by the intersection of the northerly side of Navy Street and the easterly side of Bay Avenue a/k/a Village-Lane and Main Street; ` RUNNING THENCE North 07 degrees 10 minutes 20 seconds West along said division line between Lot Nos. I and 2 on said map, 207.70 feet to the southerly side of Willow Street; RUNNING THENCE North 85 degrees 28 minutes 30 seconds East along the southerly side of Willow Street and partly along land now or formerly of William 1-I. and Joann T. Gessell, 65.93 feet; RUNNING THENCE South 02 degrees 50 minutes 00 seconds West along land now or formerly of William H. and Joann T. Gessel17 49.92 feet; RUNNING THENCE North 89 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds East still along said land, 54.53 feet to land now or formerly of Charissa A. Roberts; o 03 RUNNING THENCE South 04 degrees 14 minutes 20 seconds East along said land no mor formerly of Charissa A. Roberts, 154.15 feet to the northerly side of Navy Street; RUNNING THENCE South 86 degrees 18 minutes 20 seconds West along the northerly si 0of ® �- rn Navy Street 85.71 feet; RUNNING THENCE South 82 degrees 49 minutes 40 seconds `)Vest still along the northerly si N Navy Street 17.86 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. SAID PREMISES being known as 95 Navy Street, Orient, New York. DISTRICT 1000 SECTION 026.00 BLOCK 01 .00 LOT 012.002 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: HN H. WOODHOUSE LYN13. WOODHOUSE STATE OF NEW YORK:COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ss: On the �t Q day of June, 2005, before me, the undersigned, personally appeared JOHN H. WOODHOUSE and JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individuals whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their capacity, and that by their signature- on the instrument, the individual, or the person upon behalf of which the individuals acted, executed the instrument. N O 12Z :3 �M a ��r � C Not ublic 13�o LCMD j JMMIFER U.GOULD Nfty Public, State of Nw ft No.02GQ5024640-Suffolk Count Commission Expires March 14,20 � RECEIVED 1� DEC2020 Zoning Board Of Appeals 11111111 Jill 111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Illi 1111111111111111111111 Jill Jill SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK RECORDS OFFICE RECORDING PAGE Type of Instrument: DEEDS/DDD Recorded: 07/08/2005 Number of Pages: 4 At: 09:59:43 Aft! Receipt Number : 05-0070845 TRANSFER TAX NUMBER: 04-48089 LIBER: D00012396 PAGE: 581 District: Section: Block: Lot: 1000 026.00 01. 00 012. 002 EXAMINED AND CHARGED AS FOLLOWS Deed Amount: $725, 000.00 Received the Following Fees For Above Instrument Exempt Exemp Page/Filing $12 .00 NO Handling $5.00 NO COE $5 .00 NO NYS SRCHG $15. 00 NO EA-CTY $5. 00 NO EA-STATE $75. 00 NO TP-584 $5.00 NO Cert.Copies $0.00 NO RPT $30 .00 NO SCTM $0.00 NO Transfer tax $2,900 .00 NO Comm.Pres $11,500.00 NO Fees Paid , $14, 552.00 TRANSFER TAX NUMBER: 04-48089 THIS PAGE IS A PART OF THE INSTRUMENT THIS IS NOT A BILL Edward P.Romaine County Clerk, Suffolk County LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER& GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD, P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) M_ATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565 ebressler@wbglawyers.com December 21, 2020R_C lAVE` C. S Hand Delivered DLC 2 2020 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road, Post Office Box 1179 19 Southold,New York 11971 Attn: Ms. Donna Westermann Re: Property owned by Vincent Bertault Special Exception Application for an Accessory Apartment 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York-SCTM# 1000-026.00-01.00-012.002, ("Premises") Ladies and Gentlemen: We enclose the following documents in connection with our Special Exceptions Application for an Accessory Apartment at the Premises: 1. Application for Special Exception Permit For An Accessory Apartment in an Accessory Building 2. Proof of full-time occupancy; 3. Applicant's Project Description; 4. Questionnaire for Filing ZBA Application; 5. Pre-existing Certificate of Occupancy; 5. Applicant/Owner Transactional Disclosure Form; 6. Agent/Representative Transactional Disclosure Form; 7. Consent of Owners; 8. Agricultural Data Statement; 9.- Short Environmental Assessment Form; 10. Photos; 11. New Survey; 12. Building Floor Plans; and 13. Town Property Card;- 14. Appeal fee in the amount of$500.00 Please schedule this matter at your next available hearing. Very turs, Eric �.' ssler, Esq. EIB/cs Encls. ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE,MMC ��® �� Town Hall,53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK ® P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Fax(631)765-6145 MARRIAGE OFFICER Telephone(631)765-1800 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER Q( FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER www.southoldtownny.gov OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Elizabeth A. Neville DATED: December 31, 2020 RE: Zoning Appeal No. 7468SE Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeals No. 7468SE for Vincent Bertault (Opties & Dinehies Inc.): Notice(s) of Disapproval ,The Application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Applicant's Project Description Questionnaire =,Correspondence- lZ/Z.( 1 Zo (.cpe-t 4.0 2ZA ,,'Certificate(s) of Occupancy Building Permit(s) Misc. Building Dept. forms (Certificate of Compliance, Housing Code Inspection, etc.) Misc. Paperwork- 201 gefajn 95F C1 . Ar.ULA UcAA,%e Copy of Deed(s) Findings, Deliberations and Determination Meeting(s) _,Agricultural Data Statement Short Environmental Assessment Form Board of Zoning Appeals Application Authorization Action of the Board of Appeals __�7Applicant/Owner Transactional Disclosure Form(s) Agent/Representative Transactional Disclosure Form(s) LWRP Consistency Assessment Form Photos Property Record Card(s) Maps- Survey/Site Plan Drawings Town of Southold P.0 Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 12/31/20 Receipt#: 277018 Quantity Transactions Reference Subtotal 1 ZBA Application Fees 7468SE $500.00 Total Paid: $500.00 Notes: Payment Type Amount Paid By CK#1110 $500.00 Opties & Dinghies Inc. Southold Town Clerk's Office 53095 Main Road, PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Name: Bertault, Vincent(Opties & Dinghies Inc.) 95 Navy St PO Box 51 Orient, NY 11957 Clerk ID: JENNIFER Internal ID.7468SE ,r AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Suffolk Times LEGAL NOTICESOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALSTHURSDAY,MARCH 4,2021 at 10:00 AMPUBLIC HEARINGSThis PUBLIC HEARING will be held virtually via the Zoom online platform, Pursuant to Executive Order 202.1 of New York Governor Andrew Cuomo in-person access by the public will not be permitted.The public will have access to view,listen and make comment during the meeting as it is happening via Zoom Webinar. Details about how to tune in and make comments during the meeting are on the Town's website agenda for this meeting which may be viewed at http-//www.southoldtownny.gov/agendacenter. Additionally,there will be a link to the Zoom Webinar meeting at http://www.southoldtownny.gov/calendar.aspx.10:00 A.M.-JIM BRODSKY#7466-Request for a Variance from Article III,Section 280-15 and the Building Inspector's December 2,2020,Amended December 8,2020 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct an accessory garage in conjunction with a new single family dwelling;at 1)located in other than the code permitted rearyard;located at:1895 Pequash Avenue,Cutchogue,NY.SCTM No.1000-103-7-15.10:10 A.M.- VINCENT BERTAULT#7467-Request for Variances from Article III,Section 280-15;Article XXIII,Section 280-124;and the Building Inspector's October 22,Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling,and construct an in ground swimming pool;at 1)proposed additions located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet;2)the accessory swimming pool is located in other than the code permitted rear yard;located at:95 Navy Street,Orient,NY.SCTM No.1000-26-1-12.2.10:20 A.M.-VINCENT BERTAULT #7468SE-Applicant requests a Special Exception.under Article III,Section 280-13B(13), The Applicant is owner of subject property requesting authorization to establish an Accessory Apartment in an existing accessory structure;at:95 Navy Street,Orient,NY.SCTM#1000-26-1-12.2.10:30 A.M.-SAMUEL J. DIMEGLIO,JR. #7469-Request for Variances from Article XXIII,Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's November 17,2020;Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct a front porch addition attached to an existing single family dwelling;at 1)located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet;2)located less than the code required minimum combined side yard setback of 25 feet;located at:2280 Deep Hole Drive,(Adj.to Deep Hole Creek) Mattituck;NY.SCTM No.1000-123-4-6.10:40 A.M.-MICHAEL KREGER#7470-Request for a Variance from Article Ili,Section 280-13 and the Building Inspector's January 6,2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling; at 1)more than the code permitted maximum two and one-half(2-1/2)stories;located at:985 Bay Shore Road,(Adj.to,Pipe's Creek)Greenport,NY.SCTM No.1000-53-3-13.1.10:50:A.M.-ROBERT AND DONNA DRUMMOND #7471-Request for Variances from Article III,Section 280-15;Article XXIII, Section 280-124;and the Building Inspector's December 16,2020,Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to legalize an"as built"deck addition with hot tub attached to a single family dwelling,and to legalize an"as bullt"accessory shed;at 1)"as built"deck is located less than the code required minimum side yard setback of 10 feet;2)"as built"shed is located in other than the code permitted rear yard;located at:675 Private Road#12,(Adj.to Corey Creek)Southold,NY.SCTM No. 1000-87-4-7.1:00 P.M.-COTTAGE ON THIRD,LLC#7472-Request for a Variance from Article XXIII, Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's January 13,2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct a new accessory pool house/garage;at 1)more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%;located at:850 Third Street,Greenport,NY,SCTM No.1000- 117-8-7.1:10 P.M.DAVID ZAPPULLA#7473-Request for Variances from Article XXIII,Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's December 23,2020,Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to demolish and reconstruct a new single-family dwelling;at 1)located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet;2)more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%;located at:810 Linnet Street,Greenport,NY.SCTM No. 1000-48-3-13.1:20 P.M.- JAMES AND LAURIE CARNEY #7474-Request for Variances from Article XXIII,Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's December 15,2020 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to 377e8c50-e53d-42ee-95fb-6d18cb3aafee kimf@southoldtownny.gov SOUTHOLD TOWN BD OF APPLS 370 V AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Suffolk Times construct additions-and alterations to existing single family dwelling;at 1)located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet;2)located less than the code required minimum rear yard setback of 35 feet;located at:No#Equestrian Avenue,Fishers Island,NY.SCTM No, 1000-9-6- 3.1:30 P.M.,-CHRISTOPHER AND MARIAN BRIGGS#7477-Request for Variances from Article III,Section 280-15;Article XXIII,Section 280-124;and the Building Inspector's January 25,2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to legalize"as built"deck additions to an existing single family dwelling and to legalize an"as built"accessory shed;at 1)as built shed is located in other than the code permitted rear yard;2)as built deck is located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 40 feet;3)as built deck is located less than the code required minimum rear yard setback of 60 feet;located at:320 Oceanic Avenue,Fishers Island,NY.SCTM No.1000-9-7-9.1.1:40 P.M.- KONSTANTINOS DIAKOVASILIS#7465SE—(Adjourned from February 4,2021)Applicant requests a Special Exception under Article III,Section 280-136(13). The Applicant is owner of subject property requesting authorization to establish an Accessory Apartment in an existing accessory structure;at: 2095 Ruth Road,Mattituck,,NY.SCTM#1000-106.-7-6.1:50 P.M.-SUFFOLK COUNTY ENERGY STORAGE II,LLC#7463SE—(Adjourned from February 4,2021)Request for a Special Exception-pursuant to Article XV,Section 280-62B(S),the applicant Is requesting permission to construct and allow for-public utility structures and uses;i.e.,battery energy storage system facility;located at 69430 Main Road(NYS Route 25),Greenport,NY SCTM No.1000-45-5-1.The Board of Appeals will hear all persons ortheir representatives,desiring to be heard at each hearing,and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each'hearing. Each hearing will,not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review on The Town's Weblink/Laserfiche under Zoning Board of Appeals(ZBA)\Board Actions\Pending. Click Link:http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0. Contact our office at(631)765-1809,or by email:kimf@southoldtownny.goyDated: February18,2021ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,LESLIE KANES WEISMAN,CHAIRPERSONBY:Kim E.Fuentes54375,Main Road(Office Location), P.O.Box 1179,Southold,NY 11911-0959 377e8c50-e53 d-42ee-95fb-6d 18cb3aafee kimf@southoldtownny.gov SOUTHOLD TOWN BD OF APPLS 371 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Suffolk Times State of New York, County of,Suffolk, The undersigned is the authorized designee of Andrew Olsen,the,publisher of The Suffolk Times,a Daily Newspaper published in.SOffolk County,New York. I certify that the public notice,a printed copy of which is attached hereto,was printed and published in this newspaper on the following,dates: February,25;2021 This newspaper has been designated by the County Clerk of Suffolk County,as a newspaper of record In' this county,and as such,is eligible to publish such notices. Signature Eliot T.Putnam P'�inted'fVarite "' Subscribed and sworn,to before me, This day of " C 200, Notary'Signatu III STATE OF NEW YORK'. KOIARY PUBLIC .G ALB N1 (1 0IRE6.M44' C Notary Public Stamp '�., SStON Ehpi��`,.��� 377e8c50-e53d-42ee-95fb-6d 18cb3aafee kimf@southoldtownny.gov SOUTHOLD TOWN BD OF APPLS 369 Y � � s BOARD MEMBERS ®F so Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 �® �® Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. �® ® �® 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento ��c®U \, Southold,NY 11971 9 http://soutboldtowliny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, MARCH 4, 2021 PUBLIC HEARING Due to public health and safety concerns related to COVID-19, the Zoning Board of Appeals will not be meeting in-person. In accordance with the Governor's Executive Order 202.1, the MARCH 4, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting will be held via video conferencing, and a transcript will be provided at a later date. The public will have access to view, listen and make comment during the meeting as it is happening via Zoom. Details about how to tune in and make comments during the meeting are on the Town's website agenda for this meeting which may be viewed at http://www.southoldtownny.gov/agendacenter. Additionally, there will be a link to the Webinar Zoom meeting at http://www.southoldtownny.gov/calendar.aspx. If you do not have access to a computer or smartphone, there is an option to listen in via telephone. 10:20 A.M. -VINCENT BERTAULT#7468SE -Applicant requests a Special Exception under Article III, Section 280-13B(13). The Applicant is owner of subject property requesting authorization to establish an Accessory Apartment in an existing accessory structure; at: 95 Navy Street, Orient, NY. SCTM#1000-26-1-12.2. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons or their representatives,desiring to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review on The Town's Weblink/Laserfiche under Zoning Board of Appeals(ZBA)\Board Actions\Pending. Click Link:http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0. If you have questions, please telephone our office at(631)765-1809, or by email:kimf@southoldtownny.gov Dated: February 18, 2020 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LESLIE KANES WEISMAN, CHAIRPERSON By: Kim E. Fuentes 54375 Main Road (Office Location) 53095 Main Road (Mailing/USPS) P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 %ofFat �� Town Hall Annex, 54375 NYS Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 oo Southold,New York 11971-0959 ®� ®� Fax(631) 765-9064 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DATE: February 1, 2021 RE: INSTRUCTIONS FOR PUBLIC HEARING The following policies are required by New York State Law Dear Applicant; Due to public health and safety concerns related to COVID-19, the Zoning Board of Appeals will not be meeting in-person. In accordance with the Governor's Executive Order 202.1, the MARCH 4, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals Regular Meeting will be held via video conferencing (Zoom Webinar), and a transcript will be provided at a later date. The public will have an opportunity to see and hear the meeting live, and make comments. Below, please see instructions for the video conference hearing and material xequired',to,prepace, for the ZBA public hearing which includes: PLEASE-READ'CARETULI,Y: 1. Yellow sign to post on your property a minimum of seven (7) days prior to your hearing, to be placed not more than 10 feet from the front property line (within your property) bordering the street. If you border more than one street or roadway, an extra sign is supplied for posting on both street frontages. Posting should be done no later than February 24, 2021. To avoid weather damage to your sign please affix it to a sturdy surface such as plywood. If your sign is damaged please call the office and we will provide you with another one. Prior to your public hearing, members of the Board of Appeals will each conduct a personal inspection of your property. If a Board member reports that there is no signage visibly on display as required by law, your scheduled hearing will be adjourned to a later date to ensure compliance with Chapter 55-1 (B) 1 of the Town Code. 2. SC Tax Map with property numbers. 3. Legal Notice of video conference meeting. Instructions for participation will follow, and will be posted on the Town's Website under the meeting date, and the Legal Notice section of Suffolk Times Newspaper. 4. Affidavits of Mailings and Posting to be completed by you, notarized, and returned to our office by February 25, 2021, verifying that you have properly mailed and posted. Please attach a photograph of the posting on Your property with your affidavit of posting. 5. Instructions for Laserfiche/Weblink to view application. Instructions for ZBA Public Hea-.,..., ' Page 2 Please send by SPS Certified Mail Return Receik the following documents to all owners of property (tax map with property numbers enclosed) vacant or improved, which abuts and any property which is across,from any public or private street. We ask that you send your mailings promptly so that if any piece is undeliverable, you can reach out to your neighbors to request their mailing addresses, and re-mail. Mailing to be done by February 19, 2021. a. Legal Notice informing interested parties of meeting being conducted via video conferencing. (Enclosed) A WEBLINK to the meeting will be provided on the.Town's Website under the date of the meeting. b. Your Cover Letter which should include your contact information, date and time of hearing, procedures for submitting written comment via email or USPS to our office. Recipients should be able to contact you for additional information. Furthermore, if recipients need to contact the ZBA staff, they may telephone 631-765-1809 or email us at kimf@southoldtommU.gov or elizabeth.sakarellos@town.southold.ny.us c. Instructions for Laserfiche/Weblink to view all pending applications. (Enclosed) Link to view pending applications: http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0. d. Survey or Site Plan depicting "as-built" and proposed improvements requiring ZBA relief. The Town's Laserfiche/Weblink files provides both location addresses and mailing addresses in their current Assessment Roll listing. (See Link Below). Also, the Town Assessor's Office can be reached at 631-765-1937. Contact us via email or by phone if you need further assistance. TownOfSouthold>Assessors,>Assessment Books/Tax Rolls > 2010-2019,>2019 http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/O/doc/l022250/Pa eg l aspx. 'IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS! Scan and email the VS . rnailiin9 receipts, gireen 4—Ast`ure caW aitd4 affidavits to kimf(a,0utholdtownny:gov, Aud * P O`1YIPTI, _� SLS�_.11 AILx* the_DRIGINALS to the Town of Southold, ZBA.,_P.O. Po� 1179;_S'o thuld,,_N01 1197,1. Please note that without your mailing receipts, the ZBA will be prevented from conducting your hearing,pursuant to Chapter 55 of the Southold Town Code and New York State Law. Please be reminded that New York State Law requires the ZBA to follow the above specific policies. If for any reason, you are unable to prepare for your public hearing as instructed, please let us know. Kim E. Fuentes Board Assistant NOTICE ,PLFASE BE ADVISED YOU MUST SEND TWO (2) SEPARATE USPS CERTIFIED/RETURN RECEIPT NIAiLINGS; ONE (1) FOR EACH APPLICATION. Please contact office at (631) 76::4H09 if}ouhave any Thank.you. t y 44.rtJ4 �';z.•k". i O N O�td� +S# Iz r•' ',t y �"W�) s C' ?1 4 _I'�` F�`.3 ��tl T"�r' 1 5 r ,Pq Y"i f. }. 4 .6 et- I 7 � A '��''�1.+•1 r.: � ) f ,y �.ie 1) .M .,> 7 N E A 1'O!L K�jy,.t r w •i xi IMj a :.-r s. tv, IK 3� • F ` -�' {� mt+ �jAy ? 5��_`7.,a'�'+".�,.,7+?'U-� WA rx��,� #t s 1 >"� 's. +y�_ •�f�•"it�',�. ? t,� �"a"k�s� +�,'{���'. +'•"} . i " e { 1Taw s *`x+'1. x" >''.'o--� 't r `' c d,�)f.F_.: C 46, 1z,( € j+dag';p z,t �4nF � a MWI gTogg,'�re`+ i} 1 ,�z Y t •t ;, me f.'- . ; " `�, 4'^r"Ir�'1. rkyY 5o4"r sP fi a fh:...*"Q'N+ i' �" a�..' •r, ,�, .," ` � W y� '.rsx /� 97 °hT1�'s`„a-�t�.�- {�.'"�!'W,''-� 3, � -. ��� ���'` �': •`� k r as �a.,y t,sr rT•'s d ,r+t� t. '�"� '� sA £ � � t w a a✓,d,3x.s 3 z` `3n-V �`#u6 �r �' ee` ,rte 145..,�c+s'�-.- .i�•- w� r��tf S �{,��.�F o-��T�Az��E�'jt r'�y"v-�'� 'f�j'�3.r'"sr•,'riYa�s'�- ��� �� .t e�Sa z .`+ti „: ta.,� r y,s*»'" ria'. ) }F' � 'fi>"^ >,V�, '� :5• � �+`.'<. �-.� ^n 'ti'z A' 3'�'T'�t.,.s � „�„jf�5'.` ecT�+ati "`s r�' � ��,•+. 9�1 �t„rz ,ye�r¢., '; 3 P' �'�" tv 'V�r �ir�,tZ �� � +::zl`�� •:r'�YAr....,[s:. 1` _ CS7 .'A�, :.,1C � -.J: �.��,f'c Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 2 Laserfkhe We66nk-. ,Home. 'Sroinse.`-Seardi Zoning Board ofA peals Pie count 1 (ZBA) _ �° --- - - --- -- ettcai IriQex- iR`'!tkry,ProPt°! %;>»'.- „'; rdAcawro f S3 taserfrNeSeamh Gulden Path TOwrOSmdv1d12Am gBod �, 1 2 Means sdredules ofAPlealslZON 1-:t MbutevAgendaslLegal NcecesHeadngs w freetwndate i,�i �S1 Pending 7110aW712`17'.16PM Last modtlled - i sr2wo17119T14AM ca SPectsi Evert Peralu Pe9WrementaZBAOftldah Nometadataasslgned Ex[epn9rrs L1#Code zealoepJ 1 - 1 ----___---'---------------------------�•------------------------------ - JadS"Oft LBhnB ZaA a k of Mapped 1977 Ex=ng Lots 189 ocedure&ftapes.�'.,,tt.' �:i �p - - - ---- -- - - '' -__ - - - - -`-•-- - --- - -! '^•pi' + 4-` E'l .W BIl{k Sdmdulea_._..__._.... —g Agnea a s.eon"CtSaLeai E IIII r I rpage t of 1 - - 14 Entries i-, Above: Listed are types of records under ZBA Folder. ZBA Decisions can be found under Board Actions. Click on "Board Actions"folder to open. nit, t� `5ta"" �0, :'1�t7L.,� :,� t7' � � �°)QurB ,: a'u'',•§� - iLat"'• c "=3�G.,.taTN.w'ze'L',�a�w 5•-`"-� - "�-`.d,Wt'$',�'�.C�l�s�t��'���r tiosr�e:��Br;�.se' � reb�� =- iwnt5f5oiatt[Wd�-3;rij�i��'B:ir3;r'�� Is{Z �`8t�ardi`t�rPeii�I'-���';;•„ ��.- "': fY��'.., �'S+t ,,�` x� �"_t :+t`' ,y �9-".z�"�s��`�"��-vs �'+�"✓i�';,' ��"�,��:,,- ;A3 . . �,,•; �Bois�iA� 1.1+h fyPen .E PaIM ;,t , CAp 50-11 J.!` z j ell,pECbY11CRWft160WdC Lq;T,IiEEttCL{vE$t; CTeaUgmdaze 1-1—f- -' '¢I 73TFtE---- 118 — ---- _-- Lasttr,�adit�ed i_._i--- ---- ----- --- --- -- -- - ----------- ------------- -- ----- ------ fil912DZtl3:58:$B Ptv� I I '�X7383-Spiiter 7006.59=r89 `�73845E•kt�Fitestitts.A!tydoi#ites4r�s�-C�rrip$rola1d�1000�0-�-5'- �•- -n 03855E-fried.1000»50-1-13,1 i No meL-data assigmd #7986'860-Bayview brfve-LLC 10oo-s7:510.1 _ � "�8�,7387Hari1�6rner10p0.61-41 #73871Hard Comer-SITE PLAN-Arch Plans 1000-61,4-1 - '§'#3UiKlinton'frrev-Trust 1600-128:2-201 0738982nlrIWO,,711-4 #7406'N3ppa1D00+88-1-1.5 ----- EPage t ON Above, Lists all Pending Applications under Board Actions/Pending URL Address, Link is http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0 Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 3 ` c Laserflhe WeUink _ 'AtyYlela-ink`1-F1e1ii 'bok i-Slgn Out _Home 'eibwse', Search TotvnOfsoud,old>zoning Board OfAppea15(29A)T rdAdigns ,i,. __•:' _ __ Board Actions Name--_—_-.—._.. -..._— Page court 4`e�,platr a1n= ;<<_,', .. •'^'= rg.�; - EM1,24M. mow" 'i i',3"'s,� ` ,Bo ,,�,^^___=a-^^^; asp 1957.1979 ' .•,Ir. .'`—=;_ •� � '�19841999 __ __ Path ,1 jTovnOiSoutholdgoring Board ofAppeals(ZBAMBoard Athan ED 2001 ' Creation date ( ! 3 zooz 711012001 1721S5pM t 2003 Last modified '6•I'� - - - -- ---- - -- - _- - - --- --— --- - - ---- --- - - ---- ---- - --- --- - ------- 3/28M1711.3607AM -- - � f 2005 L2006 ! ! 2007 1 Nometadataassigned + _ ___- _ --- _-- --.—_---- 0 2ooa f fa 2009 &ins j •ae3 2010 - — — - - - - -- ---- - - - - ,�,�wv.� -- - - - - 1.{.v'°Ptt? &1 2011 t' 2012 = � 1 [$]2013 2014 + 2015 ' �z017 —'------`--'----'--'-`----`-----------'_'- - .w.r.��M, fe�mg__._,._.__—,___--____ Above: Board Actions are listed by year: Click folder to open. 'All Special Exception applications that-require Coordinated SEQRAAnalysis are stored in,"Pending"., zonµ ,�,�N.. - -- ----- - - -I-'+a:�e .ar� tc1011��-3'�at�r ----ed+axt�___--'- ---- 1LfEnti ,. 69)3 78_ Bdard Adta+s htl1 0 7 9a emNANbu afApp.4(20A,ltgeyd f'{ leO, 1ao _ .._. a dwRbOi AMMMt7 'il tae as D—dAa ,AIIA179119.'17AM laR matlleaG ��'�9Mu 75 8-dAdiaa 116 eoard— • _t �M11 6) emrd/aean NO+md,alOtd muynal � '1j®)Ot) )0 9oxd Ktbro M19 M 84Vd)db'u A211 So f1OudAtltms MN w —d— • i�M7S 11e (bndAttb+c � f�70)a )3 6Ovd Mkm '�j M7a 63 Ba.NIAa¢ ' ' JA)019 3 B ,d— ' Above: See listed File Numbers. Click on file you are searching. ' f , Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 4 , -' . -. - - - -.F.y �_',_,:,.�.r�,�.*r.rw=+�r+!.�.v.,y+it ,'sr'r,�-"- %�- -_ - •`' -.-.Di`:r x s', Above: In addition searching by file no.You can also use the above search tool by typing the name or title of the applicant. "Cas erf3cheWebl;Ink; •fes' -'-- _ - - ,=, -;h-•',�''t',-'=',—:_`.,=..;:a::.�ts� Home -Sroyrse Search - - -'(r customize search. ��., ;' I 'Sortresdts by, Relevance 6v Records Management Search 97016 nerd name_ - Board Actions-83 pages) I cl—fielJ Page count 83 Template name:Board Actions i, ' ._..�� Page :Colin and Kristen Cashel PROPERTY LOCATION 162 LowerShingle Hill.Fisher_ I Page 4 ,19.2017#7016,Cashel SCTM No 1000.9.1-26 minanus approval to reme_ a Page 5 .y 19,2017 97016,Cashel SCTM No,IODO-9.1.26 GRANT,the wrlan{es as.. l Search sena Page 9..COON 8 KRISTEN CAMEL SECTION 009 BLOC.. 1` :1 Page20. Thomas AhIgren(Cashel),PO Boz 342 Rshers island.NY.. : Show more information.. - =i ' 97018 j Board Actions-56 page(s) Page counC 56 Template name:Board Actions rl I Page 48...930 A.WCOUN CASHEL AND Variances under Article IdSechon ANN_ Page 48-3nCe(s)KRISTEN CASHELS7016-Request proposed trellis located In other tha.. Show more Information_. Above:Shows you files that can be found using a phrase, name or title. Or you can search by Tax Map No. (District, Block and Lot) using the format 1000-111:4-1. LaserflcheWstiLrnk. ._ Home- Sio)vse_. SearchYownOtSoulho)rt>2oidng6oard,afAppea)s(ZBR)>'MlnidesiAgen'dash.eg�INot)cEsltieartrtgi- r Minutes/Agendas/Legal- Name Pau. Wt Notices/Hearings fa 1457.1979 C�R 2000.2009 i Path i TownOfSnuUwl2oto d¢oning Board _ Of Appeals j I n 2011 (MAMmutes/Agendas/Legal �- ! 2012 - -- NoticesMearings Creadondate f 2013 _ 7/101200t 257 40 PM i C2 2014 Last modified + eD 2015 ' 12/IW016215,14PM f F - { t '(-T 2016 Metadata , ^ � `s:.,,• ,� f �2017 No metadata assigned 1 Page 1 of 1 11,Enh - _ - - 'onvi•tamti+sennnw?+1P®eraerrn«6ci.First'iuiei93amul�.i23.NI!Apc.wnm... .. .. ..... ...^, ._ ": _ _- yd_ Above:Also, Minutes,Agendas, and Hearing Transcripts can be viewed. Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 5 L'aserfiche'Webbn'k ,� o 4•; "" ~Home -Browse 6e'ar1h "'To�auiGltgtttttoM7ZOnittgeoardoff ppeaT1>Jinu(e`s7A8daiiFegal Mo 6- - } '- - __ "1`': _ .;fid.,.:``,...`�',�r'`'"'•P's°��`''�,'.;r l 2077 • <_=.�: -Name _ Page munt t'^'r^- ^^'-"y—m�'T_'r•+;""';'� (C1 Z8M01/05f2017 7 :•"" '`." el ZBA-01105=17Agenda 4 Path ';i ZBA.,0110SM117 Hearing . 40 TmnOfSouthoid170n1ng Board cf Appeals Qj ZBA-Oi/05!2017 W 3 'f Notices/HearingsQOW �-" __ ._.. __ _ _ - _- _, _. _... .-_ _ ._ _ •._._ _. _' ZBA-01/19/2017Agend 2 mationdate - - - - - - - - --_-• - _ _ - _ •_ _ _.____ ..._. _ ___-._____.. 12/16/20162:15:14 PM Q ZBA-UMM 2017 7 '- last modlBed i ZHA-02/01/20T7Agend. 4 W19RD1745359 PM `I I�' �ZBAdY/02!2017 Hearing 45 •^ +� e�edatd:_'� r�-:;.'•'.; t „• ZaA-02/0212017 W 3 - II ZBA-02/16!2017 l NometsdataassWied _ Agenda - 3. ZBA-0L16410175pedal 3 sdwe StHewtts _ - l ` Z0A4 3102/2017- _ - ia6f�}lidpsmeall,UteQ �._ ZeA-03!02!2017 Agenda _ 4 M,03/ONd017 Hearing 65 zo"3/0=17 W 3 ZBA0M,612017Agenda 3 R I' ZBA-03/16110175pedal 3 ZB4-04062017 v .- _. _ ___. _._•._ ..____......,.___ .__ E ZBA•04 - -7Agenda -4- ("_.it-'.i D ZBA-0406=17 Hearing - - _ 45 - Above: Agendas, Minutes and Transcripts are in chronological order. Revised 6/15/2020 i4u" Tl (`. E U' F HEAR1, i4k1,ffi "he following application will be heard by the' Southold Town Board of Appeals VIA ZOOM WEBINAR - REFER TO ZBA 'EBSITE FOR AGENDA on httpom southoldtownny. niov FAME : BE,RTAULTVINCENT # ' 7468SE 1000-26- 1 - 12 . 2 ' VARIANCE : SPECIAL EXCEPTION 1 ,EQUESTm ACCESSORY APARTMENT IN AN ACCESSORY BUILDING CATE : THURSDAY, MARCH 4, 2021 10:20 AM "ou may review the file(s) on the town 's website under Town :ecords/Weblink : ZBA/ Board Actions/ Pending . IBA Office telephone (631 ) 765-1 809 t ' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK : AFFIDAVIT OF In the Matter of the Application of: POSTING APPEAL #7468SE Vincent Bertault SCTM No. 1000- 26-1-12.2 (Name of Applicants) (Section, Block&Lot) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK I, Vincent Bertault residing at 95 Navy Street, Orient, New York ,New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: I am the (x) Owner or ( ) Agent for owner of the subject property On the 24th day of February , 2021 , T personally placed the Town's Official Poster on subject property located at: 95 Navy Street, Orient, New York indicating the date•of hearing and nature of application noted thereon, securely upon subject property, located ten(10) feet or,closer from the street or right-of-Way(driveway entrance) facing•the stre6t or facing each street or right-of-way entrance,* and that; will remain I he eby confirm that the Poster hasweamimxd in place for seven (7) days prior to the date of the subject hear ng.date,which h ri date was shown to be March 4, 2021 1 (Owne gent Sign urev Sworn to before me this Day of ,� -�� , 20..P-1 , Cheryl Simons Notary Pubic,State Of New York No.31-4,70341 Qualified In Suf1o1i<County (Notary Pu lic) Commission Expires J ebruary 4,20_ * near the entrance or driveway entrance of property, as the area most visible to passerby TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. .��"�(,(,t 1 �; SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK Appeal #7468SE AFFIDAVIT OF In the Matter of the Application of: MAILINGS Vincent Bertault (Name of Applicant/Owner) 95 Navy Street, Orient, NY SCTM No. 1000- 26-1-12.2 (Address of Property) (Section, Block &Lot) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK I, ( ) Owner, ( X ) Agent Wickham, Bressler & Geasa, P.C. by Britney Santos residing at Albo Drive, Laurel, New York New York, being duly sworn, deposes and says that: On the 17th day of February , 20 21, I personally mailed at the United States Post Office in Mattituck ,New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in Prepaid envelopes addressed to current property owners shown on the current assessment roll Verified from the official records on file with the (X) Assessors, or( ) County Real Property Office, for every property which abuts and is across a public or private street, or vehicular right-of-way of record, surrounding the applicant's property. (Signature) Sworn to before me this 7�` day of , 20�/� Cheryl Simons tVotary Public,State of New York ii,+/r✓TvJ No.31-4970341 Qualified in Suffolk County (No ary Public) Commission Expires February 4,20 PLEASE list on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. All original USPS receipts and mailing confirmations to be submitted to the ZBA Office along with this form completed, signed and notarized. • I � ° o Sam m ° Ln ° Ori '� �_ °Or if t rp Certified Mad Fee i I. _ Certified Mad Fee ,p I �i .�1ru 3.�u !�' ,r ® CIA, {I N $ lti $ Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fees r 1 1 Ipka ) I I -.— Extra services&Fees(check box,a--.-- E] $fee t ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $--s-'- -I �Oytmark fA ❑Return Receipt(hardcoPY) —�q"�,$ yr o PO ttnark 0 r 0 (E C ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ ere�"�( ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ . 3 ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ . 1 '� L O Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $�— y •F y.0 �r s Q []Adult Signature Required $ {I— 1 11 y•8r� ❑Adult Signature Required $ li ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery - q`a .�• �"j� ❑Adult Signature Restricted Det(very$ -^�""'n,`� p Postage E 5 1 O Postage Er $ fit:°7•. o- $0.75 I12!17!2�121 $ 02/17/2021 rU Total postage and Fees I! Total postage and Fees ti $7' N 'l°2!I cO Sent To ra Ellen_J._ McNeilly------------------------------------------------- ro Lawrence Bernstein , C] Smee[anifApt.No.,or PO BOOV40- - - p Q $OX 314 E 3 Siieei and Apt IVo.,of PO B6-M r` 70 Vincent__St.s -------- r- 20 Vincent__Street---------------------------------------- - arr scare,ziP+a NY 11 5 ---`st�ie,ZlP+4® Ocie t rient, NY 11957 :ee 1 el ele• :le 0 0. eae•e• .+h' 11 0 © ® ® ® ° © ea m Ln ®. Er /s ..f] - - - � Oko ewr a• 11rI ° 17 ftut ► Certified Mad Fee �� �O Certified Mail Fee I_952 rU $3.60 -, e�q 1:1952ytp, 1 ru $3.60ITU 16 Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee date)' J I I(j Extra SeNlces&Fees(check box,add fee rot ate) �'� �' ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ ❑Ratum Receipt(hardcopy) $ 1 jlE -'`+•,1�� I r-3 - -- yy C Q ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ y.->h Past Return Receipt(electronic) $ d:r � Postm`aik O �•fit° I= ❑ F 2 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ - s� Her I Certified Mail Restricted Delive $ Ed Here p, E-3 n TTTi— 0 []Adult Signature Required Delivery $ -! ! •.-( O ❑Adult Signature Required $ Y E]Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ (j°tIi I ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ ""' Q �(i p Postage O Postage $0.75 j� 'ri O-• $ {I,7c Cf" rU Total Postage and Fees I7 'x02 r. Total Postage and F7 0�j I ,a ' • rU g t�J!7!�. 1 rU ' $ $7.20 $ I eO Se To co Sent To I r� Sonia 0. Gesell ,� y ----------------- ------ ----------------------------------------------------- ' Niia _ll.(RTnT1S.__$s__�•+-IIJ�-- �7d2.�---------------------------------' O SfreetandAptNo,orPOBoxNo. • 0 Sra an pr. o or o xNd. t. 9E 7 Riverside Dr. b 74th fit. , A --------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Citi.State,ZIP+4® cr srare,Z1P+4® son NJ 07760 - - ------------ lew York, NY 10010 :e :19 1 0 1 lee•e A — 0 a ®R A Er W1 r Ir 0 119W Q AY Ori I 111!!111111111w 1II Ma ° tri L1 U }� Certdled Mall Fee ,� ) I Certified Mall Fee 'JIT 52 '6[I I �) $ $3.60 �A �I��Y I � � 6.Services&Fees(checkbox,add fee �!te) j t') lb I_ Return Receipt(hardcopy) CI Extra services&Fees(check box,add fee dfi �. ® I ❑% nic $ > t ❑Return Receipt(hard coPY) $ Return Receipt(electronic) $ - •`� — PostR)arkRR 1�p pOstma ❑Certified Mad Restricted Delivery $ •v L•a��• •° �j Hele 0 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $— r J Here "I 3 •a, Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ I O ❑Adult Signature Required $ -°'-�•'�^`a*� ,.;`'r�.�'7 O ® Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ C:3 ❑Adult Signature Required $---Ytr O��' ❑ ..� ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ _ }� C3 Postage r�7 O- $11.75 0 PostageI tl c IN° t �I I`) rU Total Postage and Fees I i2l17l21 i21 ..0 Total postage and Fees tI !-1 -� 7.20 C) $ $7°20 I � c0 Sa tTo 2 r. ogan Family Irrevocable Trust o sert[TQQ Navy. St_._ Trust____________________________________________ 2595 Villa oB6i1V6 1Rear (C SireLtandApt Np-. or Pd Box No. t l0A I i?' ----------------- �9 W. Nth S t. , AP - ----------------- 1 ,state,ZIP+4 cf -----ZIP+4s------- (rient ANY 11957 r - Yk =°° N ew- orNY 10011 :11 1 I1 111•e � - i Property Owners/Information m o e rZI 26-1-4 244-- ZA L U E� Ellen J. McNeilly -.D Certified Mall Fee ru $ $3.60 1-1952 70 Vincent St., P.O. Box 314 I`' Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,,add fee 9`9 epsrt�jr_ ) (�I T IC IIb Orient,NY 11957 0 El Return See (hardcopy) $ ;, ;,;, �m r-3 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ .✓ 0 ❑CeMad Mad Restricted Delivery $ t® Hell p E-3 ❑Adult Signature Required $-' '111-fflh Ij I 26-1-6 El Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ 9 O Postage Lawrence Bernstein Er $0.75 20 Vincent Street ru Totat Postage and Fees ) (j?j1 ��7 7 na T°211 fes). f_7/�i1�1 Orient,NY 11957 $ j �O Sent To rq Thomas E. & Maria R. Reinecke___ C3 Street anrlApt No.,or P�Box IUo. 26-1-11.1 r- 42 Lindeman Ave --------------+-4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Sonia ,State,ZIP+4e Sonia O. Gesell Gloster NJ 07624 7 Riverside Dr. Rumson,NJ 07760 26-1-12.1 Evan Lewis & Lynn Lewis 40 W. 24" St., Apt. 9E New York, NY 10010 l 26-1-21 Brogan Family Irrevocable Trust 2595 Village Lane 1Rear Orient,NY 11957 26-1-24 Thomas E. Reinecke & Maria R. Reinecke 42 Lindeman Ave Closter, NJ 07624 26-1-25 - 220 Navy St. Trust SENDER:COMPLETETHis SECTION If COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY 79 W. 12" St., Apt. 10A ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. S gna ure New York NY 10011 ■ Print your name and address on the reverse ❑Agent so that we can return the card to you. /l ❑Addresses ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, ReceivsO (Printe&Name) C. Date f D Ive or on the front if space permits. I 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? s I Sonia 0. Gesell If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ro 7 RIverside Dr., Rumson, NJ 07760 ! I 3. Service Type 1:1Priority Mall sC� 11 ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MailailTMTm t ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted )3 Certified Mail(D Delivery 9590 9402 6031 0069 3957 65 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationrM ?018 2290 0000 7267 4 0 6 5 -isured Mau 13Signature Confirmation isured Mail Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery _ ver$500) Ps Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt L ON DELIVERY • SECTIONCOMPLETE THI T• ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A:Sign ure ❑ gent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ❑Addressee so that we can return the card to you. B. eive d Name) C. Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, (Pri I or on the front if space permits. v� 1. Article Addressed to: Is delivery dress different from item 1? ❑Yes if YES,an delivery address below: ❑No I Evan Lewis & Lynn Lewis 40 W. 24th St. ,, Apt.,,9E i New York, NY 10010 i i 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® i ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MadTl i ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Re9isterd Mail Restricted) II�IIIIII IIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIII II I III II II III IIJN Certified Ma0 , 1, [3Certifl d Mail Restricted Delivery c3R tlive ur Receiptfor f 9590 9402 6031 0069 3957 96 ❑Collect on Delivery = Merchandise Th(� j ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted.Dehvery Signature Confirmation 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label)_` —r{ i 1 i ' 10 Signature confirmation`; { _ _f n — i 1surd Mad i S ,# 'i 1.., i I Restricted Delive ' isureil Mail Restricted'Delivery' ry 7018 2290 '000'0' 7267 ' 4089 7267 ' 4089 ' ,ver$500) PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt% i COMPLETE •N COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. rwzv, nature ■ Print your name and address on the reverse': ❑Agent so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee ! ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,, 617-,Tlecelvecl by rintedd Name) C. Date of Delivery P- or on the front if space permits. �( rG. v 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes 220 Navy S t. Trust If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No 79 -W.' 12th St.-,-Apt 10A New York, NY 10011 3. Service TypePriority Mail Express@) ,i I II I IIIIII IIII In I IIIIII III II I II I III I I I I I I III 11Adult Signature ❑RRegisteredMalITM 13_ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery 13 Registered Mail Restrictd aCertifled Mail® Delivery ❑Certifid Mail Restricted Delivery ❑R erurn s ace' �a'Jpt for 9590 9402 6031 0069 3957 03 ❑Collect on Delivery _ 11Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTM 2_Article.Numher_fTransfer_from service labe/h��-- ured Mail 13 Signature Confirmation 1 7020 2 0 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 61 -918 9 tired Mail Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery =_r$500) PS Form 3_811,July 2015,PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt -— COMPLETE • •MPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY Ws.Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signature ■ 01"k your name and address on the reverse X 13 Agent tt I so that we can return the card to you. Addressee i j ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. 1`17 v (Pri to Name) C. Date f Delivery J� S ' or on the front if space permits. t` 1 Cl 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ s Thomas E. & Maria R. Reinecke If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No 42 Lindeman Ave ! s Closter, N7 07624 ) 3. Service Type ❑ II I IIIIII IIII II I IIIIII IIIIII II I II II I II I III Priority Mail Exre� §s® El Adult Signature ❑Registered Malp1 11 Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑ eed Mail Restric ted tdCertified Mai® Delivery ❑Certified Mail Restrictd Delivery ❑Return Receipt for 9590 9402 6031 0069 3958 33 ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restrictd Delivery ❑Signature ConfinnationTm '^^tired Mail ❑Signature Confirmation y 'red Mail Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery 't ?018 2290 0000 7267 4133 zr$500) (PS rbrr ?811�Jliily 20151ggq 1530f 02j 000-97531' Domestic Return Receipt ,f t . Moir 95 .: cc �° 3 rt �v ��� ~iuv�wxex�i ^mow a. �eosasnna.a 'ww ,,,,,,mow W"=,tntuu t[e[rnor t 3 � t- V 3 � .eyp�n ip f i �1& tl tt all AAj 'IMF 717 ` r., e .r J t • t LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER& GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD,P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565 ebressler@wbglawyers.com February 24, 2021 Kim E. Fuentes, Board Assistant Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Re: Appeal No. 7468SE Property owned by Vincent Bertault 95 Navy Street, Orient, New York SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 Dear Ms. Fuentes: In connection with the public hearing scheduled for the above referenced application on March 4, 2021, we enclose the following: 1. Original Affidavit of Mailings together original USPS receipts and mailing confirmation; and 2. Original Affidavit of Posting together with photos of the official poster placed within ten (10) feet from the street(both Navy Street and Willow Street). Please advise if any further information is required. Thank you. Very t yours, Eric res EJB/cs Encl. Y 4_ a } - SECTIONWLETE THIS ECTION ON DELIVERY " ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse Addressee so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, e• Received by(Printed Name) D e of Delivery ( r or on the front if space permits. - D. Is delive address c iff0r&f%from items? 13Yes � 1. Article Addressed to: ry If YES,enter�delivery'dddi'ess slow: No Ellen J. McNeilly f 70 Vincent St. , P.O. Box 314 (FEB 23 2021 Orient, NY 11957 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Expresso IIIIIIIII IIII III�IIIIII IIIIIII II I III IIIIIII III ❑AdultSignature ❑RegisteredMail [3 [3R Adult Signature Restricted Delivery Registered Mail Restricted ff j QCertified Mail® Delivery I ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for 9590 9402 6031 0069 3957 27 I ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Del El Signature Confirmation' 2. Artnf icle Number(fransfer from-service label)-__ --{—.— isured Mail i }I I ; ;r I[3D Signature elivery mat(an 1 isured Mail Restricted Delivery Restricted el(vI, 7018` 2290 '0000� 7267 4027; ver$500 PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt ►� � � ,off 625ee202-f7f8-4bec-928a-6c7c870f7ae4 kimf@southoldtownny.gov AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Suffbik Mnes- "5•�`�.v.�.�'���"'1�WMY"�•4•�,3'..'m Syw+v'1n LEGAL NOTICESOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OFAPPI�,ALSt1SDt11� R21at 10:00 AMPUBLIC HEARINGSThis PUBLIC HEARING will be held'virtually via the-Zoom online platform. Pursuant to Executive,Order ,202.1 of New York Governor Andrew Cuomo in-person access by the public will not be permitted,The public will have access to view,listen and make comment during the meeting.as it is happening via Zoom Webinar. Details about how to tune in and make comments during the meeting are on the,Town's website agenda for this meeting which maybe viewed at http://vwvw.southoldtownny.gov/`agendacenter. Additionally,there will be a link•to the Zoom Webinar meeting at http://Www,.southoldtbwnny..gov/calendar.aspx.10:00 A,M,-HEATHER LANZA 500 Request for a Variance from Articlefil,Section 280.15;and the Building inspector's March 19, 2021 Notice of Disapproval based ornan application for a permit to reconstruct a deck addition to an existing single family dwelling;at;1)resulting in an,existing accessory garage located In other than the code permitted rear yard;located at!2'200 Yennecott Drive,Southold,NY,SCTM No,400-55-4-32.1.10:10 A.M.-WILLIAM R. AHM UTY AND JOELLEN AHMUTY 4 45 -Request for Variances from Article XXIII,Section 280-124,and the Building Inspector's March 5,2021 Notice,of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to constructa deck addition to a single familydwelling;at 1)located less than the�coft required minimum side yard setback of 10 feet;2)located less than the code required minimum combined side•yard of 25 feet;3)more"than,the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 201;located at:3405 Bay Shore,Road,Greenport,IVY,SCTMNo.1000-53-6- 10.10:20 A.M.-PETROS AND PENNY TSEKOURAS 498 Request for a Variance from Article lII,.Secticrn 280-15; 'and the Building Inspector's March 15,2021 Notice o Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct an accessory in-ground swimming pool;at 1)located in otherthan the code permitted rear yard; located at:1852 North Bayview Road,(Adj.to Goose Creek)Southold,NY,SCTM No.1000-70-12-59.4.101,30 A,M.—F.1.WEATHERVANE ENTERPRISE,LLC 496-Request for Variances from Article III,Section 280-14,•and the.Building Inspector`s March 7,2021 Notice-of Disapproval based on ari application fora permit for a lot line change;at 1)Lot 1,measuring less the minimum code required lot size of 120,000 sq,ft.;2)Lot 2 measuring less than the minimum code required lot size df,120,000 sq.ft,;3)Lot,1 measuring,less than the code required minimum lot width of 200"feet;located at:Off East End Road,Fishers Island,NY.SCTM No.1000-2-1-8.1 and 1000-2,1-8.2.10:40 A.M.-CLAUDIA KING RAMON 7.'417 Request�for Variances from Article XXIII,Section 280- 174;and the Building inspector's February 24,202 otice of"Disapproval based'on an application for a permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing,singlefamily dwelling;at 1)located,less than the code required rear yard setbackof 35 feet,2)more than the code-permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%;located at:130 Village Lane,Orient,NY.SCTM No.10'00-18-5-610:50•A.M.-CECILIAOTTAND ENDRE MESZAROS tr510 Request for Variances from Article III,Section 280-15;and the Building Inspector's April 6,2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to legalize an as built shed.and an as built hot tub,at;1)shed is located in other than the code permitted rear yard;2)hot tub is located in other than the-code permitted rear yard;located at:1225 Arrowhead Lane,Peconic,NY.SCTM No.1000-98-3-8,.11:00 A.M.—DAVID ROHDE(!7SQ Request for a Variance from Article Ili,Section 280-15;,and the Building Inspector's February 22,2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to install an accessory generator;at;1)located in other than the code permitted rear yard; located at: 1615 Anchor Lane,(Adj,to Shelter Island Sound)Southold,NY.SCTM No.1000-79=4-6.1.1:00 P.M.-PETER TORKELSEN 00 Request for a Variance from Article XXIII,Section 280- 124;and the-Building Inspector's March 25,2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to legalize an"as-built"deck addition to an existing single family dwelling;at 1)located less than the code required rear yard setback of 35 feet;located at:800 mer Lane,Southold,NY,SCTM No. 1000-78-9-18.1:10 P.M.— JONATHAN BABKOW AND MAIA RUBIN67equest for a Variance from Article XXIII,Section 280-105;and the Building Inspector's April 15,2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct an eight,(8)feet fence surrounding a tennis court in the front yard;at;1) more than the code required maximum four(4)feet in height when located in the front yard;located at:S60 Private Road#8, (Adj.to Dam Pond)East SOUTHOLD TOWN BU OF APPLS 364' 625ee202-f7,f8-4bcc-928a-6c7c870f7ae4 kimf@southoldtownny.gov AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Suffolk rimes Marion,NY.SCTM No.1000-23-1-18,1,1,20 P.M.—MARCELAND SHELLEY DZAMA 51 Request for Variances from Article Iil,Section 290-15;and the Building,inspector's Aprii,19,2021-Notice of,Disapproval based on an application,for a permit to,construct an accessory in-ground swimming pool and to legalize an existing'accessory greenhouse;,at;1)pool is located in,other than the'c6de permitted rear yard;2)greenhouse is located in other than the code permitted rear yard,located at,-162,0 Koke Dfhfe(Ad).to`Dam P'ond):Southold,,NY.SGTM Noy 1000-87-5-19A3A:30�P,M,-VINCENT BERTAULT 746 ,(Adjourned from April 1,2021)Regyes,"tfor Variances from Article'Iii,Section 280=15;Article XXIII,Section 280-124;and the Building Inspector's October 22,Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a pdrMit;to Construct additions and alterations to an existing<single family dwelling,and Construct an,in ground'swimming pool;at-1y propos'ed additions,located less tharithe code, required minimum front yard setback:of 35 feet,2)the accessary swimming pool is located in other than the code permitted rear yardf located at:95,Navy,Street,Orient,NY.SCTM No. 1000-26-1-12.2.1:40 P.M,-VINCENT BERTAULT ,4685 (Adjourned"from April 1,2021)Applicant requests a Special Exception underArticl'e Iii, Sectiari 28 (13). The°Applicant'is owner"of subject property requesting authorization to establish an Accessory Apartment in an existing accessary structure;at.95 Navy Street,Orient,NY.SC'rM#1000-26-1- 12.2 The Board of Appeals will hear all persons or their representatives,desiring to be heard at each hearing, and Jor desiring to submit written statem6ht's before the conclirslon of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above.-Files,are available for review on The Town's Weblink/Laserfiche under'Zoriing, Board of Appeals(Z0A),\B6ard.AeYrons\Pending. Ciick Link: http:/f 24.38.28.22 ,.2040/`WLebli6i /Bfowse.aspk?dbid=0: Contact ddt'office at,(63�1)4765-1803,or-by email: ki4@sautholdto0riny>goWked: -M,ay20,202,1ZONIN6BOARbOFAPPEALS,LESLtEXANE8tWEJS'M` N,- C}1,41RPERSONBY:Kiirr E.Fuente 54375 Main Road(Office Location),P.O.Box 2139,Southold,,NY 11971.0 , 9 SOUTHOLD TOWN BD OF APPLS sss 625ee202-f7f8-4bcc-9,28a-6c7c870f7ae4 kimf@southoldtownny.gov AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Suffolk Times / State of New-York, County of Suffolk, The undersigned is the authorized designee of Andrew Olsen,the publisher of The Suffolk Times,a Weekly Newspaper published in Suffolk County,,New'Y.ork. I.certifythat the public,notice,,a printed copy of which-is attached hereto,was printed and published ln:this'ndwspaper on the following dates, May27,2021 This newspaper has been.designated by the County Clerk of Suffolk County,,as a newsp#per`of recbrd in this coutily,;and as such,is 01gible to publish such notices. Signature,, D 7D Eliot T,Putnam Printed Name JON 2 2021 Subscribed and-sworn to'before'me, —This 04 daypflune 2021 otary°Signatu' '°°,,i����„1 e►n®r�p,��� �������.• STATE :OF NEW YORK'. I<OTARI'PUBLIC: N = .L'• ALOANIY eC L r•f 0 RE6399443 ` Z Notary Public Stamp d SOVEHOLD TOWN BD OF APPLE 363 BOARD MEMBERS ®�� �oy®� Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairpersons ® 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora - ell , �a .- Office Location: Eric Dantes i `a� Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento COWS Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, JUNE 3, 2021 PUBLIC HEARING Due to public health and safety concerns related to COVID-19, the Zoning Board of Appeals will not be meeting in-person. In accordance with the Governor's Executive Order 202.1, the JUNE 3, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting will be held via video conferencing, and a transcript will be provided at a later date. The public will have access to view, listen and make comment during the meeting as it is happening via Zoom. Details about how to tune in and make comments during the meeting are on the Town's website agenda for this meeting which may be viewed at http://www.southoldtownny.qov/agendacenter. Additionally, there will be a link to the Webinar Zoom meeting at http://www.southoldtownny.qov/calendar.aspx. If you do not have access to a computer or smartphone, there is an option to listen in via telephone. 1:40 P.M. -VINCENT BERTAULT#7468SE— (Adjourned from April 1, 2021) Applicant requests a Special Exception under Article III, Section 280-13B(13). The Applicant is owner of subject property requesting authorization to establish an Accessory Apartment in an existing accessory structure; at: 95 Navy Street, Orient, NY. SCTM#1000-26-1-12.2. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons or their representatives,desiring to be heard at each hearing,and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review on The Town's Weblink/Laserfiche under Zoning Board of Appeals(ZBA)\Board Actions\Pending. Click Link:http•//24 38 28 228.2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0. If you have questions, please telephone our office at(631)765-1809, or by email:kimf@southoldtownny.gov Dated: May 20, 2021 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LESLIE KANES WEISMAN, CHAIRPERSON By: Kim E. Fuentes 54375 Main Road (Office Location) 53095 Main Road (Mailing/USPS) P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 4Z- Town Hall Annex, 54375 NYS Route 25 J _ P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax(631) 765-9064 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DATE: May 3, 2021 ` RE: INSTRUCTIONS FOR PUBLIC HEARING The following policies are required by New York State Law Dear Applicant; Due to public health and safety concerns related to COVID-19, the Zoning Board of Appeals will not be meeting in-person. In accordance with the Governor's Executive Order 202.1, the June 3, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals Regular Meeting will be held via video conferencing (Zoom Webinar), and a transcript will be provided at a later date. The public will have an opportunity to see and hear the meeting live, and make comments. 3rr xu. ,�--yr x'�,�s,�,.9�v— 7 r^-^F -r.' �:, Belo a : ectioirnor; iedeoca erence=jlear�ng.and maternale(�uir�d toy re�axe �`•e..;,,g ,? ew,'ca ;s:Na{:- <>4€� �.,rn;i4w2 �, y, '_� t1`o t5>t :e Mhearm W_' -includes t��P E'ASEwR �^v.....�7..>. �;.:�,.....,,�-r.:�....,.,yw. 1. Yellow sign to post on your property a minimum of seven (7) days prior to your hearing, to be placed not more than 10 feet from the front property line (within your property) bordering the street. If you border more than one street or roadway, an extra sign is supplied for posting on both street frontages. Posting should be done no later than May 26, 2021. To avoid weather damage to your sign please affix it to a sturdy surface such as plywood. If your sign is damaged please call the office and we will provide you with another one. Prior to your public hearing, members of the Board of Appeals will each conduct a personal inspection of Your property. If a Board member reports that there is no signage visibly on display as required by law, your scheduled hearing will be adjourned to a later date to ensure compliance with Chapter 55-1 (B) 1 of the Town Code. 2. SC Tax Map with property numbers. 3. Legal Notice of video conference meeting. Instructions for participation will follow, and will be posted on the Town's Website under the meeting date, and the Legal Notice section of Suffolk Times Newspaper. 4. Affidavits of Mailings and Posting to be completed by you, notarized, and returned to our office by May 27, 2021, verifying that you have properly mailed and posted. Please attach a photograph of the posting on your property with your affidavit of posting. 5. Instructions for Laserfiche/Weblink to view application. Instructions for ZBA Pub raring Page 2 Please send by USPS,yCer=tifed Mai11$etura=Receipt the following documents to all owners of property (tax map with property numbers enclosed) vacant or improved, which abuts and any property which is across from any public or private street. We ask that you send your mailings promptly so that if any piece is undeliverable, you can reach out to your neighbors to request their mailing addresses, and re-mail. Mailinjz to be done by May 17, 2021. a. Legal Notice informing interested parties of meeting being conducted via video conferencing. (Enclosed) A WEBLINK to the meeting will be provided on the Town's Website under the date of the meeting. b. Your Cover Letter which should include your contact information, date and time of hearing, procedures for submitting written comment via email or USPS to our office. Recipients should be able to contact you for additional information. Furthermore, if recipients need to contact the ZBA staff, they may telephone 631-765-1809 or email us at kimf@southoldtownny.gov or elizabeth.sakarellosgtown.southold.ny.us c. Instructions for Laserfiche/Weblink to view all pending applications. (Enclosed) Link to view pending applications: http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0. d. Survey or Site Plan depicting "as-built" and proposed improvements requiring ZBA relief. The Town's Laserfiche/Weblink files provides both location addresses and mailing addresses in their current Assessment Roll listing. (See Link Below). Also, the Town Assessor's Office can be reached at 631-765-1937. Contact us via email or by phone if you need further assistance. TownOfSouthold>Assessors>Assessment Books/Tax Rolls>2010-2019> 2019 http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/0/doe/1022250/Pa el.aspxx. •,x�frI'.lqV2YF.`I,:,�9P.in;s�;�=O._i„,�oK'r_'f�R"e�`sYz-�.,L�'xt>YT_,.-XsSNeA}��L.rte-.N,:�„..fi-._.tT:7_”>-,.;..i�-_;',t�sar_,#3n-Yw`r`:y,3�-r-»^•�-.:::+,�aN�-''-<.^ -- :--r}t` �`-�?_=i.4.^'_FRt S{�:.-»:_:`I=;�.4r,i..-',':J.,'`.r_�r�'x=�"-iY„s'tfiiicv;t'.,•rff.''f+::.a:.,�_'�Yri i'::y e_x�f.�"r,�;xdzam`��-z,',c`,,._.=�.ro..:,.',.5-tX�~.,,Ywz��.'r,a.�^a r,�t`-��r'":�`::"-�-.. �4r'INST VSx .tX ” ;+1S ��i��'F+"E::��'_J-._,jr:"�%•(�1t��f�r�'„.wI�a�M'kab�,kia,",''.+",.,�'".N+•C=1��':;'v�"`_l„.�,).,".�1h-:9f��.'`„ _�,i-''s,!µ""”`j�}�""�•_°'.`'��%`;;'-1 s.,�>�,=k:'�wa.- .- Fn..<k.,e,;tv�. U`r:?w`+. ,3.. -...."1k-fi,'d`r•,i:,•,.� :,^s= �r, ,i.;wr.i's^.z+y,q<y:an l reinail t=1ie ;USPS>.;mail'Ing" '>�ecei is= reen ipr ¢'ria,fure ,(�a`rdsx-a= d �i ^.1..:43`..,�.L:'''J:b�m� �=t',•"�a,_.�,St,,i:_ _.oaw,r 44r _ _ '�-'�wr�p.;, r F,•.,...•h'x'. - - - `.:i'•i _ F"5t".'. x`� :.L%v.'.G3-.e5�e+. __ [lr;. ���f`.s^:7.`^R',Y,� uf_, - - - 5_4,` __K-,�:_t. .{. '�,'?:� .+.��� _ .'ri3?'.y `^�'S•tsa .^'Z. "at.u ''.rlV'i"ham i�:.)i,�.�..xc: _ _ ,^;+'+six fink" ">wy .G " tw-^m�S., "t3"�A; ��,•.,• �} 1rsL'.'"xi c.i'.fi7: ,.l-SaJ,i, .'„*-- 4=x°:f���e5"r� affiavitsyto;kii . "`ou z :A x'<F . _ m. > ' a thoIdton'I .gQya,ns,u., 4,PlOPTYF°YJSP ',^S` _ ;s-.- - - - :.x••- '�'"_;Yx. - •d,ns =¢,• T''.F==.,.-�,�4'.:.x.0 �.,t,�s,., - - t,xNv.,,J.�- I, the ORIGINALS Pta' � e`Town of Soiitl olc ,-ZBA, P:O,.:Box:1179,=So`u WILd" NY; sh:5'-R2'"5�''il - ��;"*_3^ =4-r. ,.�F. - -..lee - `;4r i��-":`+iii:'.ar"-t+v.- ..rnE"s. ,i.%z�•„)1�4:i ".4: S;i FM-':i_y.�u,-1 n'•r s-+A:: - ��' '�6 riSr°=,-;•'.t.<�'n>3;;.r'y>. 'ac',:C..>:,n=�k 'N �.S - ,'.tie`--• .i��. - Ys�'Y„'"`]_�d..,y>, /,?�,.- ,ay ,�y'^_ >f:4:,,`�"�?r r J:. .+.0 C!�wit ni+"'.�=a: may. _ .J`� �1�, •'�^:``:� �-M`�✓"'w.;.':yc u..fi: .S', - __ >h' _ .� ter;,., "r`:-:��� .1r - -"'�'-:.•_ - ....-i^_ Please note that without your mailing receipts, the ZBA will be prevented from conducting your hearing,pursuant to Chapter 55 of the Southold Town Code and New York State Law. Please be reminded that New York State Law requires the ZBA to follow the above specific policies. If for any reason, you are unable to prepare for your public hearing as instructed, please let us know. Kim E. Fuentes Board Assistant al§ f NS � YORt�#S t iy + fliv� Z° w . p -SaCf43 f ,, -:skew-' `+ ,y t< f Fjr t � rt._o M. �+.} awrlyra s z.� r Fe s e^ +ar,u �^'C`°.=s. 5"> a {a."G' 'a°�'r'�` �, ., v." +. , •' +"y<.+�"f�°Z���,rs {t� �i1 F CA}"I'AGT a.C�'�avStr ,.,# ":a. � .srr{ any �n" 't; cus„ zusf-.Sn+S e .�,,.va�kL.: � ''^�9y +s;, 4 -+ 3 t }� °X t, .r�Z,(rk�`' ` ' `j• t°'1 '�'^"< t Tli. `Y ?,r '�^'r 'z.+2,t Y .f �rc y�„y .* '' �.p&c .� 5, j.t"1"d 'x f r rft3 •# �;, � fir.k zayrwy q-art.�;�� ,s'tr'�,St.��.:t• "�E y&"��t`r.i yam y M J+d . F,+y�;� '. i,a f--TOO T1yP ',".•t W3' a ''LT z56Adiu1 3.s ,�� r '` ## Se . 'Y ,.Xl i•'t ;+ tf.-+""7L s42'{{k''N �'?..uik2'v"hTJ�ii }t`• r, i- �; [ (r{}X�c1t �2 �esi,>tr�$�rt� ;--Sr---"ssd '�F f�"f'�f � ''✓..� �-f t � .;��>2' a,� s�K,....3 a at 1Y 3^sY,al C ft"",) x. k r"•r ' ray Y r 1S 5!K.3 a°r w t a s Zxs v * ? ,h„,. a 'r'i IM r' I. 9�2,an ` Sy,• 't• �'fie`�4 k��p� y »": x>�q am' 's�` m-W . .r "r d .re 'cY a f ,t �,aR+Ei hq Au4ar^ .�r� � f*j, 52u �E 'Z'tM 3.4'�E t`'L'x ^'s �t• aT to {3 t £ Z r. A°� Y�� �y(3 �•�6' �S„„h � � \ i E t�L_/�*� .�W S cy *1�X� �' V �,(X']S Y 4 7.3 � . ;MCI;rLp �.f:r3'`R '� T r '';•r'i.S ys+r& moi,7' \ �"-tk.t y��`��r 1-",`°y. �'k' '�- 3�3 'd. �v �r �"ITc Mir t'sT,4` can apy rr.s4 r- r s mat- +s,. ME �a s Y�e2 � ct .t�'k§lE}"�.t,+- s 010 >r Laserfiche Instructions , n t./ ZBA Files 1�/ Page 2 VVV laser(Iche,WebL-l�nk'.- - �.� • j-w``=`:-�••:�;__.- _�•1.,.�;,'s'��' wcburta�;P.^�-' T�>,• - - 'T-T_fSoWttdd>_.-. _-,`_:._.�.._: :�:;.�.r:._.._--..�„t, '"'�. _ �.,'-*-•-- •--' •',^, ''�'''.-iV.r,t'i�.r... Home.'.Browse•,;5eaicfi"' awnb Zonlrig'8dai0 P(�PpwlFl?�;' �='fiT�.. = o- -h�`n'F4r -,F ,�ti.•"•,�ryy,`i";,r- {R.,_-.r.+:.-���i,---%�L-.�w7. `ii .E.. -I.�t•4� S'. ( - J•`r ��-�i�^�`:t 3'�-V,I y"- ..i h�"�:., t f:t';w1•it�ti. /. _ t i—:-f rY—:''"-.: (' �'._^x�.•_g"t t.h�el'�`~;^•'f."-•'l�.-.-.e Y� '[k.^_]��.2, :.�- a5��:'v - Zoning Board ofA!peals—� N'^x 1 (ZBA) ,; m~ ------••-------- — -- - ----------- -- -- ---------- ------ `�: `�oP,eJS,les}s1:;},a"�h� BOifE AC110f19 - _ _ .. _. •- _. - n b3 Laserfthesearrh Guide Paths __ _------ TO�iI( of Appeals PEN 14f Mtm:Oes/AgendasRegat Nobces;H¢a" ' Creationdate j,,; is P�dhx 77108001 1217,16 F4A -'-----'--'—-- -- Er3 Reports LastinoMed -_-. _._.. ........ .. ... ...._._.. ...._....-._,- ..-.. .. ...._.....-..__.. SMM1711b7:14AM [r=-. �' rsp oai p '_ fSt MA Policies Nommdalaasslgned `' El DMepWM LM Code 280.1000) 1 E i` e"�Nrisd4Lal LkWg 1 ®2811 Book olWl?ped 1977 EstSitrrE Lois - ._...... _. __. 189 . ued as "''�• - << ®"Sdteddes _ __ _ S_•_ __ _ A&M K M��-^rarutsBLeases -r fPaget oft -T--_ _ - '14"ies' Above: Listed are types of records under ZBA Folder. ZBA Decisions can be found under Board Actions: Click on "Board Actions"folder to open. __ -:,.. ,. ,,t�,-.;,P.],,..F'i.-r. n.--.r;:...,.b- � • ,r chi ` T 1. .1J Ri-"R•5S' iJ:1 TMT, _I.Cflys 6'�^+1� . �l 4� - j_. �y�y ,�i.�e�.ri,,^.�:�i Com. ftq- ? OWN`' - -.,� ;kM eh,t�;s.'% fi;` '6^kZi?5`'.-. ty:' ,,kl• J+C"t•���_SB ���b�; _�►�ttl�;r�.�fCfll��i•+�lAl � ��1 '� ';t•� G�17?�;�d(i�7��•�E�.�^�is*J�r.:�?�;;'r , j•ti� - - - - -�" - - :�'W :;'is ','t' :-r��..�1':.:;°: K�G^^,'Y+n.._y,:.S-u•�Y,r .5 ' 4h ' - '%/:.:-.'t::v;�y'.�w51.�1'3�f-•y'''.r:1I _tii�i 5f';� ';f - 1:;,. r��f i'-F ��.t G� �'F,_•�•�,.. r is•.�:4y,!`�= :..d5fr�.Csi t'tF., = 1' ' Ong" , .fib5hi811Sd!?ti7 .... ��1,b`.*()'y'�? .*,ate.'".'.R•(1 _,.,�..��._,.—,...,.— _—...,_�..—..�-�__..,.•_.,u.�_....,_ • a 1 :i t • r �••`J, ,'�r��1T`71C7�l�i�f�/f�3;7RUC�X- ..... .......... ......-, .� � ..M..-�....,_...__,d.__ •t' [reayorsdat� `•`'� �''��7a�i1d�U3�`3 �a=��� 311812tl'TI1:36A jAfyt �:r'.. -• -...._ __. .. _ ..._ I CasY►ttQdl�`fed' I - -' - 35ohk1.�;€aY�`ilii°I�-Wil---------------------------• ------------ sr§�oz��3;;•sffaM' �` + '�;_�?�-s7?[irerx, _..._ _• . .. . .. .. .. .. ... _ -j ���r.�s���.HN�Resa'rEs.=t��eri�iesoris-�Ga�iiPSr�17+>a•-'�o0 -3=5 ti s H�i=i I-1" r `: 73)15` 'fried.tOQ�501 i�1 � NometadataassTgled' �B738b$66,BayvfevaDrhre-11G4000.87:�S�t0:1 #,-38711 rrJ Col it Y 10Dti .1 4,•t 1 teJ ? /:l rd,r rrier,'�'SJi-'PVAN 'Ar6iPtal:00 066t44 •� '�� �'.�73t}S-"Nliiiton'Irrew�kYusE1060-'128rY=20`-- ------_---_ ----_`---•---_--___ -- - f { } 239 6eh(r 1000,41-14 - ----- -- -- - - - (''I 4740b4NapPa 100p"a8 l-1.5 I `� Page 1 ot'1 .,.. ....,e,_. ,��.,..,....� .._,.,._ � „e,,..._.•.._w. 4., I Above, Lists all Pending Applications under Board Actions/Pending URL Address, Link is http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=o Laserfiche Instructions / ZBA Files Page 3 (/ La'semche,Wek ° akv; • ;r -_ _ dyvie�lu ritida�r,�� y i st"voiT B�jrorisP„earth ToWnOtSe oldi zoni Boafif f 1 26A11r-BOatdAdl tl ==,+.,.;v'= '` - ,,?, i• `e" .,, ` 'dome lll{t P.PQP?d f 4_$ .t�' ,),_.<< 4f'^'(, x�.anc=q, Board Actions Name r _`� Page count „- _ _ ,,t s.� •�1957-1979 '�� Pn��!`.3l•� '@ e�• �1980.1999---...----'- -- --- '----- —�—.------'------'—----_"_'_`----__'- Path ED 2000 -TomioMotahok tZordog Board 'Ir --.- _.- _---------'-_.--'-------------`._'— —'--- _ - ofAppea1s(ZWVoard Adlons -j 10 2001 Creation date 1 bmr2001 t22135PM` -I-' E3 2003 ' Last lrlodified _ A2004 32WM711:36-O7Ah1 —___----_-_---___--_— _-- Fz 922M = T- - 2006�_--_ ED r Nametardataasigrled I 21107 -- ---_—.- ea 2008 A 2009 2010 '8< ,R"""P�,a,-�a, 03 2011 ------- ;i il .4 M 2012 !' 23 2013 `� SEi 201E• i M 2015 ` •�<< �c5 2017 i Above: Board Actions are Iisted by year. Click folder to"open. All Speciaitkeeption'• applications-that require Coordinated SEQRA Analysis'are stored,in 'Pending". 2017 g Eaae 3a� eo,�a.uwa__ Pam `� i 9 wvr ae ew.anman — a A p"ht2aArawd ® — -1t9 aevdxt,mu -- �.1 �]Et7 n eondAmac 1lRnndtfkd 6=01791rS1 AAI C ®1(It. IIs nobdAnlmS asc-.,z•,•----+r• " ®lou er Po.dAmae `tiun7AE6�J2ro,-7•; _.'., } 7ols Ne rt d.W �asJyvf (-f1®roX,7ro m.,d— jI �;Ela - ]d.-• .• �- BmedAtlla¢- 5Q ro+P sa mrew.lam ®ro1l sP 'Poard.mms _ . • g 1vn - n awroinw�o d®1014 es ew d Au- 3 it Above: See listed File Numbers. Click on file you are searching. Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 4 Cashel , - - - - qtr:,,✓ ._'.f. _ _ - -� �•u._„4y,r,�.y�''i _ .wY�r be”a"rY,,,.a=1 _>J•".`cT""��'� {.'.'T.=4':..:.. Above: In addition searching by file no. You can also use the above search tool by typing the name or title of the applicant. '+L'ds"e5'2J6MeilV'eb�lnf4,- •-' '- _."_,_,'��r».,,'.',,_-, ;<i I sa�'d -o�i-`- -- `'1=4,_ y``�^,� ' '•EH071ie, `�� ?: .:SeaTCI?, _. CustonUze Search sort results by. Relevance O- >}Records Nan6p;M;t S"nth -- ®7016 Yn4dname j. I Board Actions-83 page(s) Uroose Cdd { Page count:83 Template name:Board Actions _j Page 3....C911n and Kristen Cashel PROPERTY LOCATION'162 Lower Shingle 1411L Rshet- ` -, Page a_19.2017 07016•Cashel SUM No.10049.1-26m[RIMUS approVW toremo-. !� Page S_yt9,ZOn 07016,Ushd SCTM Na 10Oo-9a-26 GwINL the es as_ •S—Ch ,,,y 11 Page 9-COLIN&KRISTEN CASHEL 5ECf10N 009 BLOC_ f•-- ••--------------- •- vage 20_Yhomaz Ahlgren(Ushd}PO Boz 342 Flshers Kland.NY L —S t show more Information_. 'i 7, 97018 Board Actions-56 page(S) ' , Page count 56 Templaite name:Board Actions> ' 1 Page 49-9:MA.N-COLIN CASHELAND Variahcesund&Artlde l"ectlon ANN_ Page 4a-anle(s)KRISTEN CASHELMIfi-Request proposed ilelllsloated in other ftL ,• ' - Show more Information_ Above: Shows you files that can be found using a phrase, name or title. Or you can search by Tax Map No. (District, Block and Lot) using the format 1000-111.4-1.' 4 LasI3TROkiiiWibLirtk_ "Home* Qfowse. ,seaiFh _ ;Townt9f5outhohl>..Z6nitlg_BoeraoPAPFea�5tL8AT�fiinuiesi¢ iasnt algOYS;e d(InV- jyMinutes/Agendas/Legal` "e_ _�____- T Pageco Notices/Hearings i 7957.1979 1980-1999 - - - - - -• - - - - - --- - --- - - - - -- --- ---- -� t ®2000-2009 ± Path Tonn0f5out xWgonlr%Board 1 1 2010 of Appeals i_ l 2011 _- aawotmube/Aga� 7 yfi 2012 Noticesmearings 3 I Creation date , L:1 2013 71102001 257.40 PM +•' _P_2014 d _ '3 Last modified 2015 12/16/2016 215 14 PM ! -1 �2016 No meradata assigned i Page 7 of i - 11 Enh _�_—__-----___— _ __-_.._ - ..—Decm�[:_ �ovulymMM E1YhDVntf$i�jB�,_Mlun6VilNlf�fCbrvl'-• - - _ __-- _ *'_ _ Above:Also, Minutes,Agendas, and Hearing Transcripts can be viewed. Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 5 -Law.flche',WsbWnk.- zi- 'UH Pajecount Ck ZB"11=017 7 HFIR -Q ZR"110512017Agenda, 4 Path Z-WA,T=2M'7 Hearing TOWOlSDUW&ZWft Board -ClAppeafS -A Qj M"VOSaWLN 3 ZOAMMM7 2, Zft"U19h017A9endS 2 Creatlon date - ------ 12/16=62.,15:14PMZaA-=DZ'2Dt7 7 LMniodlOed L ZB&MIQ=017ftenda 4 6M9=74:53:59PM I 2B&O2402=7Hearing 45 Ul ZRA-WO212017LN 3 No meladata assWied ZBAmmMv'spectal 3 ------------- j _4 Rk Z8A,03AWM17Hearin9 65 lb ZBA43==7LN 3 Q ZB"-Vlfn011 Agenda S ZBA-OWW20175pedal 3 23X•04[06!2017 5 MWOAMWOVAjeoda 4 45 Ab,6vei kg6nfts- Minutes'and`Transcripts are fin"chironological order. Revised 6/15/2020 i • i4u' Tlk'. E OF HEARIi4o' The following application will be heard by the 'Southold Town Board of Appeals VIA ZOOM WEBINAR - REFER TO ZBA NEBSITE FOR AGENDA on httpm. southoldtownny. niov .'AME : BE 'RTAULT , VINCENT # 7468SE 4 CTM # wN 1000-26- 1 - 1202 JARIANCEn SPECIAL EXCEPTION r,EQUESTm ACCESSORY APARTMENT IN AN ACCESSORY BUILDING DATE : THURSDAY, JUNE ' 3, 2021 1 :40 PM "ou may review the file(s) on the town 's website under Town Records/Weblink: ZBA/ Board Actions/ Pending . ZBA Office telephone (631 ) 765-1809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ; ,"ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No: " SOUTHOLD,-NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT; OF , In the Matter of the Application of MAILINGS (Name of Applicant/Owner) 'SCTIvI•.Na:,.l:oaa- (Address of Property) (Section,Block&Lot) ` COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK I Owner, , Agent ��1 L residing at Z /, /� � � New York, - being duly sworn, deposes and says that: On-the day of , 20 ,I personally mailed at the United States,pbst'Officeln � ,�d / New York, by-.CERTIFIED AIL, r RETT.JRN.RECEIPT kEQUESTE0,a true"copy-of the attached'Legal No'tice,in Prepaid`envelopes addressed to current property owners shown on the current assessment roll Verified frotri the official records on file with the( )Assessors, or, ( ) County Real Property Office, for every property which abuts and is across a public or private street, or vehicular right-of-way of record, surrounding the applicant's property. (Signature) Sworn to before me this XP day of IM 12A ) 200-1 AMY M BEASLEY NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK Qualified in Suffolk County otaryub ic) Reg.No.01 BE5039767 Commission Expires February 27,20 PLEASE list on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next -- to-the-o-caner--names-and-addresses-for_which-notices-Frere-mailed_- ----- - -- -- All original USPS receipts and mailing confirmations to be submitted to the ZBA Office along with this form completed, signed and notarized. 4 Pbstal Service7m TM "CERTIFIED o RECEIPT CERTIFIED o RECEIPT i m r.mestic Mail Only m Domestid Mail OWY Er m i 1:3 Nal of ! ,Y �1=1 irl- Or i 0Y0 1 5C Certified Mall Fee rp Certified Mail Fee Q, $ $1.b0 -�5� PJ� 0192 ru $ 3.6i_I ��GFt ! Ug�,? Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add Ise a �p te) ° 17 N, Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee m ate) �` `�� ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ 11` II 1 �� ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ -y�6 Q ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ -, - Oft ark Q ❑Return Receipt(electronic)livery $ r� -agN-���� �� P�yy���, - CI ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ >-' '_ �k4R�a 0 ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delive $_�!r:r Adult Signature Required $ L�' 9 � ❑Adult Signature Required $ •P tl" —k= �`�� r") ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ I; []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery Postage t 1 f�„� p Postage $0.756=i��'_`_ C {Q Total Postage and Fees .11 1/12/21121 ru Total Postage and Fees i_I�G12%2fa21 Q $ $7.20 � $ ' ' $7.20 ti '249n & Lynn Lewis Ca Sent To J. McNeill S i t Apt r PO Boz No: 0 Sheei andApL No.,_ Pd Box F. -- '------------------------------------------------- Apt. 9E N P.O. Box 314 --------------------------------------------------------- Grtt Stii§: P+A� - Ciy,State,ZIP+4�- - ew Or , NY 10010 e Orient NY 11957 :11 1 1I 111•I• PS,Form 3800,April 20150-9047 Sep Reverse for Instructions ■ ■ , © ■ ■ _ ru -tE,R`T-IFIEb o. • I Rul�1J 1`i7 I �- I r E L U -8 Ori !�Y-fig i Certified Mail Fee ep $ bbl {t N 6�'�, Certified Mall Fee Iia E7 Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee ate) g�ad �" ® �tIZ M1 ru $ ' .'i. I_l ,q ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ I 1 fi�OJ,"tl d Extra Services&Fees ch 6 .0 � e1��3 Ll Return Receipt py)ckbox,a$fee �`,r .. f�< C3 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ f7t, l _'.' Postmark C3 (h�1co �a 1� 17 L� ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ �AY Q eX ❑Retlrm Receipt(electronic) • $O ❑Adult Signature Required $ ��� ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery C stMark)Irl []Adult Signature Restricted Deliver/ �'ty tl_. �• ,i") O ❑Adult Signature Required $ �/i�r,7JiT�'�— a �`',�Rr G`)i C3 x e" Tr ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery $1 t_ '"— R 4, ?r-�, - Postage' c CI Posta e $ 1 1I .� $ $i 1.7.1 rte: O^ Total Postage and Fees lari 2/ �(71 RJ $ O 9 Total Postage and Fees $ $7.21 ru g �fSi' I I S ntTO, $ $7.2iI 015/1-2/ (121 rLi �oni.a O. -Gesell `- Sent To - 1 C3 --------- -------------------------------------------------------- o _Lawrence Bern ,s t e i n S ee agdAp£tVd.4oL FO Box No. __._ N �RiVersidre Dr. StreatandAWt.Vd,"orF�Bdzl t i -----------•----------------------------------------------------- 20 Vincent Street State,ZIP+4® iimson, NJ 07760 c, ,-91ate ZlP+46� -------------- Mirrient :1/ •. 1 ,, •„•., -- -- - - . NY 11957 ---------- :11 e• 111•1• i s ructions ■ • 0 CERTIFIED • O Postal • ■ ■ ' I • •- _ . Or cc - C3 COT, Y I T-7-le U 8 E • • . . rl- Certified Mad Fee $3.60 0952 O •C1 e 2 , Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add tee s`� ate) i7 r` Certified Mall Fee rr r ,�• ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ 1 1 I C K fTJlj Co $ .6ti e �•it fl�.�� Q ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ $1) till ` PostmaH((` Er ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ Extra SBNICes&FOes(checkbox,add fee ate) \f.^i' - v fT�i=F--- Here °T ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ 1 I I f•�`•r� O ❑Adult Signature Required $ -1�^,• ' P Illi Postmark 7>,, 1 11 1 ❑Return Recei t(electronic) $ y!- ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$�'” � "fl Cl []Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ iti fr " A� Postage' a .;i ; Q []Adult Signature Required $ =r $ $0.35 - •. e I ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ Total Postage Fees t s.<i 1 ,/12/2021- 9 O g y 0 Postage t $7.20 , — Sze- �- $0.7.1 - Sent To p Total Postage and Fees No ,-Brogan_Family_Irrevocable_Trust_________________ $7.21 N Sheet and Apt.No.,or PO ox No^ S To 2595__Village-.Lane_ _____________________________ ru lYomas E. & Maria R. Reinecke _ :__ ------- Cal _ Ci ,S te,ZIP+4® C] - �r�ent, NY 11957 I s e re�dIptZed;UF r#�zrJo: I eman We • . :I I •. 1 1• 111•• -- -- - - • • i'I--------------------------------------------------------------------- Ci State;ZIP+4 ' GYoster, NJ 07624 •I 1 I I 111 - - TOWN OF SOUTHOLP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS-- -- - ��-�� SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF In the Matter of the Application of POSTING, SCTM No..l-006- �'�� (Name of Applicants) (Section,Block&Lot) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK el 41�T residin at New York,being duly sworn, depose and say that: I am the(4 Owner or ( ) Agent for owner of the subject property On the o)-eL"day of - ,20-A/, I personally placed the Town's Official Poster on subject property located ate indicating the date of hearing and nature of application noted thereon; securely upon subject property, located ten (10) feet or closer from the street or right-of-Way(driveway entrance)facing the street or facing each street or right-of-way entrance,* and that; I hereby confirm that the Poster has remained in place for seven(7)days prior to the date of the subject heari g date,which hea ' date was shown to be (Owner/Agent Sign ure) Sworn to before me this Day of 20 r Cheryl W ons NNc,3State14870341 Now York ---- aueNed In Suffolk County '� — — - — -------- otary u is ----- * near the entrance or driveway entrance of property, as the area most visible to passerby ---- ---' '--- ---- ----- '------ -- ' � 1@90UM910 MY 11, PUo o- r - C3 pCertified Mail Fee - ro Er ck box,add feeE]Return Receipt(electronic,) s so nji Postmark� Return Receipt(haeS cz cz E]Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ 1,0 r4 Q �Ile cz []Adult Signature Required $ []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$cz � age � cz Total Postage and FT ' cz ru 'Vb Navy St. Trust C3an -----------------------------------------------U\p Rew York, NY 10011 ` ` COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERy i � and 3. ' Printyovrnarfte�ancl address on the reverse _so that x�e can-4:eUrn the card to you. E3 Addre 0 Attach this card to the back of the malliplece, B. ived by(Printed Name) C. Dat of De ery or on the front if space permits. I --T.—Arficle Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? Ej s Sonia 0. Gesell If YES,enter delivery address below: 0 o 7 Riverside Dr. Rumson, NJ 07760 � 3. Service Type 0 Adult Signature El Priority Mail Express@ 13 Ad El Registered MajlTm It Signature Restricted Delivery El Registered Mail Restricted! 9590 9402 6031 0069 3962�143 10 Certified Mail Restricted Delivery qRetum Receipt for 1:1 Collect on Delivery 4. Article Number(Transfer frnm-�p TvIerchandise 11 Collpet nn ri�livel`Y Restricted Delivery 13 Signature ConfirmationTm 0 Signature Confirmation 7020 0640 0001 -9870 4822 'lestrIcted Delivery Restricted Delivery, PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return R�celpit SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTjON COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERy N Print your name and address �T171 on the reverse X, gent so that we can return the card to you. A Jdressee 0 Attach this card to the back of the mailplece, B. Re ive b ted me) C. Datea Delivery —or on the front if space permits. A-rtcie Addressed to: "I - D. Is delivery address rentfromiteml? 1:3 e Ellen J. McNeilly �z If YES,enter delivery address below: El No Orient, NY 11951' 3. Service Type El Adult Signatur 13 Priority Mail Expre�s@ Z�du ignature Restricted Delivery 11 Reg Delivery 959094 El Certified Mail Restricted Delivery -q Fletum Receipt for - - 6031 0069 274 El Collect on Delivery Merchandise Article N..�.r nsfer from service label) El Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery El Signature ConfirmationTm Wall EJ Signature Confirmation 7018 2290 0000 7267 3983 Wall Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt COMPLETE • COMPLETE THIS SECTIONON Jay ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signature ❑Agent � ! ■ Print your name and address on the reverse i so that we can return the card to you. Xddresse I ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Receiv b Wed e) C. ate f Deli or on the front if space permits. % 1 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is dative ad ss different from item Ye Thomas E. & Maria R. Reinecke If YES,4atefdelivery address below: No j 42 Lindeman Ave Closter, NJ 07624 1 � 3. Service Type SI II I D I II IIII III I II II III I II I II I I I I II I I I I TYe ❑Priority Mail Expre ss® ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered Mail Ault Signature Restricted Delivery D Registered Mail Restricted ert'rfed i Mali® Delivery Certified Mail Restricted Delivery J&Retum Receipt for 9590 9402 6031 0069 3961 82 ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise ❑_Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmationrm 2. Article_Number(Transfer from service label)_ _ y ,8 r 1:1 Signature Confirmation 't j 1 i i7 0 2 D i D 6 4 0 9D D 1' 98 7?014684 I •doted Delivery Restncted Delivery• PS Form 381+1;July 2b15"PSN 7530-02-000-9053; Domestic Return Receipt k 5 . SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION • • ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.I A. Signature■'Print your name and address on the reverse X - J so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Received by(Printed Name)- C. of livery or on the front if space permits. ( � 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1, ❑ es Brogan Family Irrevocable Trust If YES,entee delivery address below: ❑No 259;5 Village Lane ,- Orient, NY 11957 3. Service TypePrionty Mall Express@ II I IIII I I II IIII II III I II I II I II I I I I I III ❑Adult Signature 13❑Registered MaAdult Signature Restricted Delivery �Registered Mailil 13R Restricted IWCertified Mail® Delivery + 13 Certified Mail Restricted Delivery Return Receipt for ! 9590 9402 6031 0069 3962 05 ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise t al.�...tie.=?r�nefnr_frnm.coruins+lahall� ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ElSignature ConfirmationTM ---•—�-;--- ❑Signature Confirmation 70 2 D . D 6 4, 00011 9 8,7 D, -14860 i _' ,ted Delivery!E j Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt J, e' COMPLETE1N COMPLETE THIS SECTIONON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A Signature ■ Print your name and address on the reverse �) 13 Agent so that we•can return the card to you. X e� ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, Received by(Printe Nam Q.Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits: 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address ifferent from item 1? �s If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No-" 220,',Navy Street Trust 79 W. 12th St. Apt. 10A New York, NY 10011 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express(D IIIII I IIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIII II I I II III IIIIII ❑Adult Signature ❑RegsteredMal[ ❑ ARdult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑RegiRestricted Mail Restricted- 1CertiSed Mail® Delivery 9590 9402 6031 0069 3961 68 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ArRetum Receipt for - ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Artie*"' ^���-frmncfer_frnm service label)_ ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation^' -i...... ❑Signature Confirmation 7020 0640 ,0001. 9870 4 9 0 7 oted Delivery Restricted Delivery ; PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt y S 5 b r14 j4 Al:ff '.Yfl, S Y i J y, NPIKE OF N[ANI N tint �r G GT�CE 4;HFAi2 NG i� «.,Aty.Yoelbeldtewnny,gar w aixax xY ` NA E BFRIAUlT,Y1NCENT YI468SE NAME eERTAUIi YINC ENT a1e4 R9oe r `� ty TC 'f 1000-281.t22 SCT7'tNC 1000.281 074 S; :} eoueY t2.2 a�- v a cE SPECIAL EACF,pTIpN T.UARD SETBACK S IOC ,,� - ', Y TA[cc eFDUEeT M t ALTY i0[nxE�LtRDT10N � — DAT4 rxw 'x Ax RETAtTu�ox o U e��ARA.•Rol Yf. Yiexexvww�M teo rM A A" DAYif Da TNutIRi.� �.ID91 �O Mi x 7 - r M r {{ ` ti rc� a z r x s ' i✓ a n e � r 4 h ��t f 14 41 6 `4`g�dm.. ' $�/r .. � ��'"yyr`„�a4*'+,asysr�ytL z��•.t .%�'.?v�' .. e3A5 qqr to ,AM '•mac..•! i r .,.M, 'i� - i tlllll.►°' -74 Rge- ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. 7H�eceived ■ Print your name and address on the reverse gent- so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to-the back of the mailpiece, B. Printed Name) C. D e f Deli ery or on the front if space permits. Q� (2-1 / � �I 1 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 77 0 Yes Lawrence Bernstein If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No 20''VIncent Street Orient, NY 11957 r 1I r I +1 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mall Express@ i II mill 1111 Im ���I��I�� I� �I I II I I ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered R Mail- El Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered MaiRestricted Certified Mad@ Delivery ❑Certified Mad Restricted Delivery &Return Receipt for 1 9590 9402 6031 0069 3962 67 ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 1 2. Article_Number(Transfer from_service_label)____ ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTM ❑Sig afure Confirmation 7 D 1$ 2 2 9 0 0 7267 4 0 3 Noted Delivery +-Rericted Delivery PS Form 3811',July 2015 PSN 7530-027000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt WICKHAM, BRESSLER 86 GEASA, P.c. P.O.BOX 1424, 1301S MAIN ROAD MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952 U.S POSTAGE PAID pp FCM LETTER MATTITUS" uenc FEB 17 2C K' NY rosracscrtv�cee AMO UIST Zz9s,\ 7018 2292 220 7267 4226 millil000 $7.20 ��E�U R�is 11957 R2305E123348-06 k UN 1�A�1U �' -ZN RE?'URNE�,OCNO NDS 02 Brogan Family Irrevocable Trust 2,j `oriVillage ge 1Rear ent, NY11957 !'id -F /./ 11,4111 11957T-_4S9 Roo! I I,Jf,II,11JyiII,Ii]/>>i���,��I,l RFs:?: - _ -- '--,�':' .i'" _ - - .� _ �-- _ _ �r•1 .'"i' - _- - _ _ - -. - - - N�Jr 1� 4 4 ' r OFFICE ADDRESS: _ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD gFF10E-OURS&PHONE 63096 ROUTE 26-P.O.BOX 1409 I, ?S0LIDATED REAL PROPERTY TAX B] MON•FRI 8,00 AM TO di00 PM SOUTFTOLD.NY 11971-0499 DECEMI_ 8,2020-NOVEMBER 30.2021-TAXES BECOME A LIEN DECEMBE _- 10 831-788-1808 FAX,031-7865189 ' ' .. .. IF THE WORD°ARREARS'IS PRINTED HERE SEE NOTICE OF ARREARS ON REVERSE SIDE.r, 473889 26.-1-21 977 01 3024 2595 VILLAGE LN 0.40 289,267,539 2,306,299 /� .• .� / 0 230 1 3 FAMILY RES BROGAN FAMILY IRRV TRT 2595 VILLAGE LN 1REAR 12/01/2020 1,600 7,000 ORIENT, ';�; ,7x;'z5 •,°` !>.I;.r • • ,s •. • ROGAN FAMILY IRRV TRT ' ' • •- • • o 127:98::-`:,a01 10' 2 "a�'> =ARSESSED RATIO>n • / 02b: ' "' VALUE:, + t',%.s'. NEW FULL YALUEI' 3026_ '= t_ �,:va• a .,,r: :grid Half: t�;=. i?,'J' y• $3,127:99.'- 06/,01""/.2020?';eY. ?1-,, ;;7,'OOU WHICH yr "` 'OF ITS: Lrv '�,-D3:SCrr',.>„ '�zw.•" 5d',ttr:"'�?'; :. :;,c..• _..}� Y}, .IS:' ' ,'{�,.•i:.:,�:a'.y '_", P O LEVY,%• �t.'TAXABLEVALUEV.I:a,±�:; �•'' ` - ,TAXAYOUNT-.tis .TOTAL TAX' _ Y R POND 'SCHOOL'. OYSTER"PONDS;LIBRARY,. 43024$' _w 71000';= 1,365+:5,7,1•• _ -0:7094` • t' ;r 2-559' 0,0` ers ':>"a; ';71.0,00;;<"f r '0.:•.000"a.+•100:00$5`'•5 d}:'; :;.� `�:'}. s, 0,0t,,'•;. �;`4`S„•"�' ';x!r';. <,is _ a, ,.�,r^1 '.yt,`. ,�, ;;a^' .c5.l;,e`,�K.,�4,.y >v.;` •" LL_, .'�i,;,wri,•, - Mt- ,}'•.^ 'F:,i;• - ,,, ,a c ty,y"'y.'.`r'- .v;s l,,.rl l"10K:,'�t,i- `*`� '��5 _ ; x'"�• -:fir` '�q:l�,''` <''i. ',t:r, `9 :i i9 d;;- .a2.1. ";<ft' LY_' ;'i- -, ,¢ r 9 '.rOcf. .3.,,i''"J":'F%}'r:: ivt^ a 3•' .°`"t q,' .w:' ..n�'• ,7: _ ..;y;,,,.,:!l•.-'.;�,,,p;,t7�'f:n.�...ar.M<"'.l.'Si•a.�?.�..ra.,. ',�y}�•'r;�..�.';`a", ^,ti .,t` _ ,'Z, .F'r'mf•- -.2d - :'.T"� ^i:"+i-'` .M..qrt N. ..•e=r'`•.I,> , _`•r-'•ir,k,'h Y-'�.^',S'%-,rvdiiif'J;�,",'.S'r'-,�-f`?_ 0-,5^;,;4{'-''-f"`.r'?,�ii<:M.N`,-i��3u-'��-•;•1ui?f�.;„_��}y1`v•i..{:-:,'amaa ik,-i,”T>t'`7,.>4;1,$>.,,-12l,.ft.w,t-`?�t�;y'tr.h�.�,,«3.<.y�,;,,a.•.�1.x•r.!,r"PSI,-;N�R 'F.G.�. syti�: i4..s= 'µ- `y :J rl'',z;»,v..'�o,.<:.s,t•3' .! .>- ":•bsi' r;t;_ ^.,r:�sa-° .,k', �;.xaw,p'�4,r- f3�+iva't'm'.r%.,�„4,i �,4;j,�a ;,;'•:xv°votti,•';?Yv.a;; • � i SUFFOLK UFFOLK i3UaCN'OUT{'Y_NT-cCY OTL"AXEG`, 02$:a. Rit�=;':'t.�S”;'--.i`�c�:.:17�•sv14n0.=u'0•"x�nt.4s��3}rE.a,2';�41%:.r6•+1:,0w,�`'3,o+;,�"�`w::>,00-, 0,-.°t00,•$&:za`:?:�.,`D�.,r=°�=v- t;•lµ�,:a�s',.r�t,J,,1,.1T_29;'::s4,3y�xr S"';"e- y.` .,2t:,'r5iy5j9.:040 ��17b621s67,$,21 . v - - - tarts ,�wr - ,Sa;`e•,,..�', -- 5.;.<,<.,en:.', 4'�>° _ n•H;-¢, - , 2.23% • ,• : 132.10 330'4r7 -':2';313`301_,: ` .'r X•:°d,.;-±:•'•.;.:::,^Ns r _'=: ,,`.+-'ir;,._} .7:,:4.s:.:. �:.' .he .✓'i, - ,;i: __ _ _ _'t rt 39.09% %. 2,313.30 MTAz,PAYROU',TAX ''i i': ' $;; {i w �:0.O0A,.y %{Cj'0`:641;:. 8:10$ x} {i!:rh.•9`:49 s,;,. ti"V OUT.,OF.,.CTY-SCCC^ ;z.a,K., _ ' `i,. 08 S" :x:tir-=i1>,iK,•7;`:0 0000- °,.z�r'3O 927 2_d w18=.,50 '5ti NYREAL-,PROP' fCO.A6$ ti F t g ;� 100$', g''~ `• ;27;10`,: ;x•x..,. ORIENT_FD' y`,110 99$: 8 a s. ?- ),,. ,z s>:: "s�d,00p0'6' 6'�6s96";�i 'R0�'r80$:"c �r; ;620:87„ yORIENT:MOSQ'.DISTRICT` 1:93$ N t �t7 OOOk,x' '12052 '' S' r Wi,r.:+ "w`•'°.,c�".s'� a., .a.�c�,,,�,:�..._ ,.�YJ,1,•�5,0.$,.�� '84;:36-i. ;'t "" 2--9:53 '�` -'`•^' "SOLID-WA a, " ,a. r'�•s4'"ezi>N>.,a.'..;..,.t"�+,y;«• 9 21;9.r�+• _ �,i''''•x=�:,,., c,, �,�.,�;,rc,,:.'-.r. ;STE;DISTRICT'; i .A ':2'i38$�' �a.i?a�',,;7=a000„ �20,:090~,;.' s��2:90 .'+'� =+•}'.• - - ;�Z,e -" •7,4_:?�"^i:y� Zd� x<;:�1� .-A '>.i- :.�,,+ S...uiwi j- " - ., `T::.'.•' - i-.t4",t` -:11+' -.S=2,i v;n'„ - '''.t..S" -'liC.s' _ _ - - 15.45% • • �r 913.43 FIRST HALF-TA •52,958.91: 'SECOND,HALF*TAX{a.'A`'' ;$2.958.92;1_ .TOTAL'TAX:LEVY'.>>®' ;55,917.83 DUE DEC.'%2010 PAYABLE WIfWLrr PENALTYTO JAN,-10.2021r DUE DMI:2020 PAYABLE WMOfPENALTYMMAY31;2021;SEE REVERSE':'` - •SEE REVERSE SIDE PDR PENALTYSCNEDULE.'r—%+•",:e• SIDE FOR PENALTYSCREOULEANO COUNTYCOIIPTROLLER'S NOTICE,:THIS,TAXA/NY BE�PAID IN,ONE OR TWO INSTALL.MENiS} SECOND'HALF�SOUTHOWIAX I EWY 2020-2021 : SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP NUMBER DETACH STUB AND'RETUhN WITH SECOND HALF PAYMENT-RETURN BOTH STUBS- 473889 26.-1-21' -21; FOR PAYMENT OF TOTAL TAX,MAKE-CHECK PAYABLE TO:KELLY J.FOGARTY, RECEIVER OF TAXES AND WRITE BILL'NO:AND TAX MAP NOON FACE OF THE CHECK. e1DtlotaNa.®u� BILL MO. - st" ;,., • - r $2.958.92 3024 I}- 1 PAID BYf`,'E1,ASSESSED` `, El-OTHER"'- CH :OTHER=_ CHHERE IF"YOU WANiA RECEIPT I BROGAN_ FAMILY,;IRRV,TRT ' The following bank branches located within the Town'of Southold accept payments during regular business hours: i Bddgehampton National Bank and People's United. 473889000000026XZ1Z21003024200000000000295892005917836 i I HALF'�90 z-----.--�— _,-,�yL------------- --,,.=i,--- UTHOLDeTAX`LEVY'„2020z2021a"- =5:i. SUFFOLKCOUNTY-TARAIAPNUMBEfi• DETACH STUB FOR FIRST HALFPAYARENT�,R FOR . 9:738,89; 26:-1-21`' ,;yt.`y1 s`,•:,"<< ETURN,90TH;STU9li u, 'xPAYMENTOF„TOTALTAX;MAKECHECKPAYABLE ;?'-_''���' sr��;u�;r,:, T0:KELLY J.F.OGARTY, :. •RECEIVER OF TAXES AND WRITE BILL',NO:AND TAX MAP,.NO:,ON'FACE'OF THE CHECK:^ ' _ - "ARIJOYJWTepIIlE- -Et29:8:,I1T0_ 9 Boom r � s. PAIDBY: ❑'ASSESSED OTHER $2,958.91 3024 t..'� „' -_ ;,j;- ;�;,;,,-c - -�-x���CHECKGHEREIFYOUWANi�ARECEIPT4, =�� ='•- � ''� Sc LY;IRRV.TRT•`-_s {=BROGAN="FAMI ' � _. •'y;-r - -x:r,-T ;A•.;;,- ,,;<;'1," s, - - a'. 'F_ 'r i•_ "'Shc'.`•r ;vA� i?- ����%g. _ %'z`rr d!_�r''3''”, '� ;'i,`p�i ,ti'i`J� -- a�:• - ^!�'' �J_`t'=7�::5�; �ty..,'(;r;t�.��{,Stv,n-,:.:;.1, „�i�•'. 1 :�. ��i="`•,•'`Yi,.':�<`�5,:.,, -t,,,,#':.'.=,`�i•�:='::r ."..=•'t,.-• 4"• '�zl - - ti/:;'e, _ c,ii, - - ?sr.:' r�x.r.) '� •�:..a*,,y, 3;1.,Nt •t'�ra;.. :x;r ,d}'. �,.. '.r„', _ ;,,�� ;:` .:`.="y".^.�'•�•- ,wi.�.,_y,< >;�->y�,�},..t�a7-.t�;�.',r s,;'"'i::;:,; a.$5:9,17i83;4.- `s=; ,The folloviriii 1'lian b hes locateii wi a , of ;, r i .�;<•A r;, :, ,_, ;•.:E,,'zr.^ .•.'• ''r,. ..; �- k• ranc thin the;Tow� ,,, ,r; ,,,,. , �, n�ofv.Southold accept,pay„me is durin re ular busine 'xs' `'Bnd'"sham ,. �I+ara,g a:^_•t`,S az'^.'J'i .,f"•'a +a.�M�;t?ve.x_.,,gl,,,yg S,<rr,»+ t"^' t,+`:F^;,.'',,,$x�'.:„ u} -g pfon National"Banti and,',People's"l'Jriite'd: .•�s,'�.,�, 5x;.,• )�. °�,�.��rr^-:"�';< ^• ,,i;.,�;A-�..�,,.�'";:;<:�;°'y>�", r,.�;.;s.�,,��°.�,�' .t`d' ti-'>:n", - :��; Mkt_ .a�-cam,, r .,.-art. -_,.,_r..,,..-._ ._a.,_.�-.':�.�'l,•-:�4�.. ,...:,.z^'`�`^'`;•ti'-:,�'��, --``43... _S_`d'r-__ U•, SY1=1•cea:f' .mss.L:%.''�'.i Yt..t"' e' ;S_.'S''s=L�, 473889000000026XZ1Z21003024200029589100000000005917837 or D 3111fe83-eb65-4a34-80e4-1bf982857e9f kimf@southoldtownny.gov AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICA71®LN The Suffolk Times / J LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS- THURSDAY, OCTOBER 7,2021 at 10:00 AM PUBLIC HEARINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN-, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Town Code Chapter 280 (Zo,ning), Town of Southold,the following"IN PERSON" public hearing will be held by the SOUTHQLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall,53095 Main Road,,Southold, New York 11971-0959,on THURSDAY, -OCTORER7,2021: The public may ALSO have access to view, listen`and make commerit.during the public hearing,as it is happening via ZOOM WEBINAR. Details about how to-tune in and make"comments,during the public hearing;are•ort the Town's website agenda for,this meeting which maybe viewed"at 'http4Htodtholdtownny.gov/agendac45nter. Additionally,there will be a link,to the Zoom We`binar meeting at http://southOldtoW,nny:gov/ca lenda r:aspx. 10:0.0 A.M.-JOHN SPIRO#1560-Request for a'Varianc-,e from Article Ill;Section 280-15;and the Building Inspector's July 28,2621•,Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct an, -accessoiy carport;at;1) located Mother than the code permitted rear yard;located at:340 Glenwood Road, Cutchogue, NY.SCTM No, 1000-110-6-5, 10:10 XM;•-GEORGE NTAVOULTZ15#7537-Request for Variances from Article,111,Section 280-15; Article IV,Section 280-19;.Article XXIII,Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's May 7,2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permitfor an "as built"amendmentto permit#42455Zto make additions and alterations to an existing-single family dwelling;at; 1) "as built"accessory structure is located in other than the code permitted rear yard;2)single family dwelling located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet; located at:870 Bayshore Road, Greenport, NY.SCTM No. 1000- 53-4- 36_ 10:20 A.M.-JOHN AND JOYCE HOZAPFEL#7542-Request for Variances from Article XXIII,Section 280- 124 and the Building Inspector's May 5,2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application-for a permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling;at; 1)located less than the code required minimum side yard setback of 10 feet; 2) located less than the code required minimum combined side yard setback of 25 feet; located at: 1490 Village Lane,Orient, NY.SCTM No. 1000-24-2-14. 10:30 A.M.-MARC AND SHARI WEISSBACH#7540SE-Applicants request,a Special Exception under Article III,Section 280-136(13). The Applicants are owners of subject property requesting authorization to SOUTHOLD TOWN BD OF APPLS 2 J a v 3111fe83-eb65-4a34-80e4-1bf982857e9f kimf@southoldtownny.gov AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Suffolk Times establish an Accessory Apartment in an existing accessory structure;at:350 Paddock Way, Mattituck, NY, S CTM#1000-107-4-2.12. 10:40 A.M.-DOUGLAS BRADFORD#7544-Request for Variances from Article XXIII,Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's May-18,2021 Notice of Disapprovafbased on an application for a permit to construct a new porch and second floor additions and alterations to a single family dwelling;at; 1) located less than the code required minimum side yard setback of'10-feet on two side yards;2) located less than the code-required minimum combined side yard setback of 25 feet;3)more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of'20f0;,located at:3705 Bayshore>Road(Adj.to Shelter Island Sound/Peconic Bay), Greenport, NY.'SCTM No. 1000-53-6=16. 10:50:A.M.-ANTHONYAND ANGELA GERACI#7545-Request fora Variance from Article XXIII,Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's May 5,2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct an accessory in-ground swimming pool with a raised patio;at; 1)more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%; located.at:600 Snug Harbor Road,(Adj.to Gull Pond Inlet)Greenport, N.Y. SCTM�No.'1000-35-5-35. - 11:00 A.M.-MARK ALBERICI#7547-Request for a.variance from Article XXIII,Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's June 24,.2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application"for a permit,to construct an accessory in-ground swimming pool with masonry coping-and raised patios;at; 1) more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%;located at.,115 East Side Avenue,(Adj.•to Mattituck Creek) Mattituck, NY.SCTM No. 1000-99-3-19. 1:00 P.M.- MANNING FAMILY IRREVOCABLE TRUST#7549- Request for a variance from Article XXIII, Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's May 14, 2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for,a permit to legalize an"as built"conversion of a screened in porch to a heated.sunroom attached to a single family dwelling; at; 1)located less,thari the code required minimum rear yard setback of 50 feet; located at: 1330 Donna Drive, Mattituck,NY.SCTM No. 1000-115-15-15. 1:10 P.M.-MARY HOELTZEL#,7550-Request for a Variance from Article XXIII,Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's lune 16, 2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to demolish and construct an existing single family dwelling;at; 1) located less than the code required minimum side yard setback of 15 feet;2) located less than the code required rear yard setback of 50 feet; located at: 6190 Great Peconic Bay Blvd, (Adj.to Great Peconic Bay) Laurel, NY,SCTM No. 1000-128-2-5. 1:20 P.M.-VINCENT BERTAULT#7467—(Adjourned from June 17,2021) Request for Variances from Article III, Section 280-15;Article XXIII,Section 280-124;and the Building Inspector's October 22, Notice of SOUTHOLD TOWN BD OF APPLS 3 -J 3111fe83-eb65-4a34-80e4-1bf982857e9f kimf@southoldtownny.gov AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Suffolk Times Disapproval based on an-application for a permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling,and construct an in ground swimming pool;at 1) proposed additions located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet;2)the accessory swimming pool is located in other than the code permitted rear yard; located at:9`5 Navy Street,Orient, NY.SCTM No. 1000-26-1-121, 1:30 P.M,-VINCENT BERTAULT#7468SE—(Adjourned from June 17,2021)Applicant requests a Special Exception under Article 111,Section 280-13B(13)•. The Applicant is owner of subject property requesting authorization to establish an Accessory Apartment in an existing accessory structure;at:95 Navy Street, Orient, NY.SCTM#1000-26=1-12.2. The Board,of Appeals will hear-all persons ortheir representatives,desiring to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit,written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearingawill not start earlier than designated above: Files are,available for review on The town's Weblink/Laserfiche under`Zbning;Board of Appeals(ZBA)\Board Actions\Pending. Click Link: http:1j24.38.28.228:2040%weblink/`Browse'.aspx?dbid=0: ' Contact our office,at,(631)',765--1809,•or by eniail:, kirrif!ttolow o uhnnyDa ,, ,September 1.6 2021 ZONING-BOARD OF APPEALS, LESLIE KANES WEISMAN,CHAIRPERSON BY:Kim E.Fuentes 54375 Main Road (Office`Location),`Mail to: PD. Box 1179,"Southold,NY 11971.0959 SOUTHOLD TOWN BD OF APPLS 4 3111fe83-eb65-4a34-80e4-1bf982857e9f kimf@southoldtownny.gov AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION l The Suffolk Times State of New York, County of,Suffolk / The undersigned'is the authorized designee of The Suffolk Times,a Weekly Newspaper published in Suffolk County, New York. I certify that the public notice,a printed copy of whichr is attached hereto, was printed and published in this newspaper on the following dates., September 30,2021 This newspaper has been,designated by the County-Clerk of•suffolk County,as a neWspapei'of record in" this county,and as such,is eligible to publish such notices. 'signot0te . ECot T Putnam: xPrilited'Name" Subscribed and sworn to before me, This 06,day of October 2021 Notary 5lgl4tur a CJ +i >� •' STATE OF NEW NOTARI'PUBLIC Notary Public Stamp ALBANY �! Altlflllill7!t1114lt ttil SOUTHOLD TOWN 8D OF APPLS 1 BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson "®f S® �® 53095 Main Road• P.O. Box 1179 �® �® Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes }` x-_ rye Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. R, ' ;=_> a� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento ®��+rc®U Southold,NY 11971 9 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631) 765-1809 •Fax (631)765-9064 LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2021 at 10:00 AM PUBLIC HEARINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Town Code Chapter 280 (Zoning), Town of Southold, the following "IN PERSON" public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971-0959, on THURSDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2021: The public may ALSO have access to view, listen and make comment during the PUBLIC HEARING as it is happening via ZOOM WEBINAR. Details about how to tune in and make comments during the PUBLIC HEARING are on the Town's website agenda for this meeting which may be viewed at http://southoldtownnv.gov/agendacenter. Additionally, there will be a link to the Zoom Webinar meeting at http://southoldtownnv.gov/calendar.aspx. 1:30 P.M. -VINCENT BERTAULT #7468SE — (Adjourned from June 17, 2021) Applicant requests a Special Exception under Article III, Section 280-13B(13). The Applicant is owner of subject property requesting authorization to establish an Accessory Apartment in an existing accessory structure; at: 95 Navy Street, Orient, NY. SCTM#1000-26-1-12.2. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons or their representatives,desiring to be heard at each hearing,and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review on The Town's Weblink/Laserfiche under Zoning Board of Appeals(ZBA)\Board Actions\Pending. Click Link: http•//24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0. If you have questions, please telephone our office at(631)765-1809,or by email:kimf@southoldtownny.gov. Dated: September 16, 2021 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LESLIE KANES WEISMAN, CHAIRPERSON By: Kim E. Fuentes 54375 Main Road (Office Location), Southold Mail to: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Fat `µ. Town Hall Annex, 54375 NYS Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 H � Southold,New York 11971-0959 Fax(631) 765-9064 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DATE: September 3, 2021 RE: INSTRUCTIONS FOR PUBLIC HEARING Dear Applicant; Pursuant to the New York State Governor's announcement lifting many COVID-19 restrictions, the Town will now resume IN-PERSON meetings that are open to the public. For those who wish to attend the meeting virtually, for health and safety reasons, we will continue via Zoom Webinar, as well. Therefore, the October 7, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals Regular Meeting will be held BOTH in person in the Town Hall Meeting Room at 53095 Main Road, Southold AND via video conferencing (Zoom Webinar), and a transcript will be provided at a later date. The public will have an opportunity to see and hear the meeting live, and make comments. re3;ydiJ .r,;..ici?ti;y£>�F,.,•{'.k:,�..n;'3r,f,r!�`,".s,�':..h�eira -see instci �Y; q � � if�oc r T ^ %,��+"1�"c'ttits1..�i,l`a��,�,.k,�:,��".,Y�'r*,c.•.'n,d,aAr,,c��.;eNi,�l.'.�.ut�r�Ndiu'fr;...e,�>x`/U,c`,--�"tsr"•',�•..�'";y?"s'' , 1. Yellow sign to post on your property a minimum of seven(7) days prior to your hearing,to be placed not more than 10 feet from the front property line (within your property) bordering the street. If you border more than one street or roadway, an extra sign is supplied for posting on both street frontages. Posting should be done no later than September 30, 2021. To avoid weather damage to your sign please affix it to a sturdy surface such as plywood. If your sign is damaged please call the office and we will provide you with another one. Prior to your public hearing, members of the Board of Appeals will each conduct a personal inspection of your property. If a Board member reports that there is no signage visibly on display as required by law,your scheduled hearing will be adjourned to a later date to ensure compliance with Chapter 55-1 (B) 1 of the Town Code. 2. SC Tax Map with property numbers. 3. Legal Notice of in person meeting,as well as video conferencing. Instructions for participation will follow, and will be posted on the Town's Website under the meeting date, and the Legal Notice section of Suffolk Times Newspaper. 4. Affidavits of Mailings and Posting to be completed by you, notarized, and returned to our office by September 27, 2021, verifying that you have properly mailed and posted. Please attach a photograph of the posting on your property with your affidavit of posting. 5. Instructions for Laserfiche/Weblink to view application. Instructions for ZBA Public Hearing Page 2 MAILING INSTRUCTIONS: Please send by ;USPS~ F,'-JR the uri► Receipt the following documents to all owners of property (tax map with property numbers enclosed) vacant or improved, which abuts and any property which is across from any public or private street. We ask that you send your mailings promptly so that if any piece is undeliverable, you can reach out to your neighbors to request their mailing addresses, and re-mail. Mailing to be done by September 20,2021. a. Legal Notice informing interested parties of meeting being conducted IN PERSON and via video conferencing. (Enclosed) A WEBLINK to the meeting will be provided on the Town's Website under the date of the meeting. b. Your Cover Letter which should include your contact information, date and time of hearing, procedures for submitting written comment via email or USPS to our office. Recipients should be able to contact you for additional information. Furthermore, if recipients need to contact the ZBA staff,they may telephone 631-765-1809 or email us at kimf(cr�,southoldtownny.gov or elizabeth.sakarellos@town.southold.ny.us c. Instructions for Laserfiche/Weblink to view all pending applications. (Enclosed) Link to view pending applications: http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0. d. Survey or Site Plan depicting "as-built" and proposed improvements requiring ZBA relief. The Town's Laserfiche/Weblink files provides both location addresses and mailing addresses in their current Assessment Roll listing. (See Link Below). Also,the Town Assessor's Office can be reached at 631-765-1937. Contact us via email or by phone if you need further assistance. TownOfSouthold>Assessors>Assessment Books/Tax Rolls>2010-2019 >2019 http:H24 38 28 228:2040/weblink/O/doc/1022250/Pa eg l.aspx. �',�4t, ,*�ft'�. 3'4`"•,-c, .a�, �;� s'r �>��.;t s,J hz�"''�-=,�.'•,.�-�0:%i7s`'F, er�:'��;'�t�>�^i�j `+• S = T� y MEL <L`.x a`ner �`.�`X7 _��.a'd^^y�r.ar tom.,.,.,gym-'3c�.r •Fn rSi.s�rLP"-'i.w `4y. IMFP.I)RTA�1T TNTItCTCTYOl ., x:,--<r. , .. ;'•'� �`�- >'f�:r,-�r';'y,�sw ��.+;*y;4>.-,f�_r as�';e*m- '+ ',=_�'- �r+ '=^x;.�.�ia.;,:�=f�.y>,5,;��.`�, fi"�':>�.ti,�>z•: :r-`v�.=ma xd=;,vr,,,e%,'��";_'.':0:` 3�.._ �,.,�'2T.� _ .;ter �'�"`r�''"°=��.�•,`�.•..�rs• ,��r��;g'.��ta.�',..,�q ����§� �. �_x.,:�.: :,� =xs ,�..„ �.�:�;.' aa �.�,.,,;�..<�.�-' ��,�.�,�?:ry..:s,,.zh,��`;�?*�c'tz�: %�' -;�;<<� �z F-a 7^f. Jrk�a��_;.�v• a:: -�t,��. "sa.,k�xx F¢�:��' �' •� �- �^��.,,<<t'" _ ',_'�;. .�_�s���,;%^.u4;.r�a� •,�,��> �� �'. #'',y �, -�..�s�>a"�>,fix:.��r",��'.a�.�».'a„�,..�.s��' ,:-, �',� s��.�,r?.��,.-cr: � •^e�r;'"..c.t ;;� (xG.i,'.x _+4 ry'';�F,k?�x l ckra'%:�r`;� *£t.�•!�':r�4 z?� -;� �-.�+;�{_...-;:F��-:,5.= a, .c:l.C::-� �r_'�'r .,, ;stir. �2-"`a-t!Y��'�''<•=�3` �' 4� �--„`k�'=CS''`''F'>'3'.,'.r"�•`=e*.� �,�can�aii'��e£ al�th`��:�J;SP�'��mal><n �;riece�n�s;�: reen �iQ-n��irex�ca;�rd� �nd�affdavits ,to F_ ;h: �i"ar`.z.,�� - ��.�„,<'-. _ _:"-�:y =."fv x,:-_ \�„'y��.�.h2�: .�rh.?y.s,�„� .L`e .7�T -i`:`r'% 'at.i'ns`+a �--'�an,..Y,^.'�A,.� t:,.ate< ,:;�"ai;':�✓ �t�� .`i"s+. �z�Y-•�`_ tee,_ "c-;c�.�a"�v�� 4.�.,, _ ��;e.:' s}+;'n'�l�s”, ;x�w���A'����a;n„c;'=r�'..�t._ _Ys-T=�,-��"r5,�„_�..;����._t5n � s�`r'..,,�"fl�`� �kim�f 'suutliol� ownn�>�ov��an��**�Y'RO�MP��I1Yu��SPSi�1V�AI°I *`�:the,;Olt�GINALS;y��o1 - `&.z attn� �,�-�_�.'- c-; •�i�'✓..��„��.''�y�'1�',��"� .�,. >�c�r _ "�'- r-.��c r_','+,::f�'':u .��r.�.r.i.,:�3.r`�sr..x.,z iii';-�„�"'K'«:,;>i;.�,r.`.,�r.;• ,�,I , - e�z``�;`;. '"'x �'= - e'-e'+-^ �;-TL¢:, :`nom^:.� �a• z �5-`'' �� ,n� tlierTown�of�So�itho�'d; �A,�P.O.��B�ox��1�1�7.9�Southo�ld,- Please note that without your mailing receipts, the ZBA will be prevented from conducting your hearing,pursuant to Chapter SS of the Southold Town Code and New York State Law. Please note that you or your representative are required to attend. If you or your representative are not present, the hearing will be adjourned to the next available hearing date. Please be reminded that New York State Law requires the ZBA to follow the above specific policies. If for any reason, you are unable to prepare for your public hearing as instructed, please let us know. Kim E. Fuentes Board Assistant " x y3.;�'''n.„ 'l�t •e iW,4? . .i: Y MPI ��r u s mss at+• fa"�✓3., aa� - �a•�`"'hf�- C 1� 'a•f ;�_�azyr��a.: i:/ L - f .3!r ,'ak...f �...^Y^.. .. i<Z•:':.:F.k s `� Qk � � E�New Xo�dy � s �r� , veevY #naa o ,�"} •1.,{''.�it, �'rte'... ;,W 1 „� sacthl k+ � a En,snsr;a '� k "fsi >7, �” xaFtts rk1FDL�'•�'t�" r�.1aS' � ,r< ln.x� a .ui�, t 4t r'�. yf f„'++.,e..:�� �'a �, 'lti 4"•u'�x 3`' A °..fe `n���>� 1..�� + k +sx.ae"*i }Y • vat 1y. �h� .'C -•fr o-*d''3 f 3".t.'S'' i "„ r S� .r � as` ,: Ea•�=9 -*. "9e,"." .�" .3`,—� �LR '*x" •"'k L-s-a. ''i a'�d►q .,a.? `s ..,l��,'+•3i' y��..`aF`�' spar' ,�" atr'�.,7t�` f ,7p,1a'F.4 3t`rN' �`'•y.�'.'r'ai �(,' a` �>�- �����.;�� {u COYFi1CT ll„ ' k+" �v� 'v ` �^ �gzzp tr ` �K?�F `rv+r3•`.-k,'k"i £'['" `� t ' • ��� i4� d F t' M' av r ^ 1dah� r:r x �h3 rr 11 g "' 'c S r h ��t t � ; fps' rir ` v 4 'rr 4r r�'• ,y Yk^ f+'r+`fi rT. 4 SPUR—.R^J.;, G+.N{�a> ..�i4Ct4 !� ' v�{•. ...��. ��F N '4�'"sapN �. after a z Y' ,• 4f Ft f3 -"•y .SSl.'`''�' x+3 '_. ',#a� .r .`{a- a.:,' y�i&l x119 ili t 'k, 4 .;y y i`K^.y L, a't} x,�';ar`.rxy^'`"f9 ;p, p,SI '..Fa-M'S's�, p �' _'4'�' r' 'to a„�.."'y, is3 .axc �' tiaaa+ ' � ' ci gf if gra e *spa a v ?NAM d1a{ m�4ti ?� atr,. r�yi j Ng. u 4� x ?, t c 'h - �Y '�'r 's�c w R.Y-35i all gig" • r� Y`fi4 Y% i' � � rcl,• `�.'f �e-inti,yx °.-'#si ,.k t >Y"�a'-- '+ �«.. .,,,t<. 'Y* '•y�, ."wc $ t1t ,� x 3NPx MA..w. '1<r 'f- ,«"� '.•"'ii '�" ' r"�,•i�a,.• ,w-r" -i "y ,.. R` "' cri '� +c x 5k t *, t` ix r y, e4:.�tr ';yam! � y 8's,�-. -Tra,fs•r�.Aya �ATd�3S?•�3r•.�e'o-. yR'�«Fa r'. >� N -� rh$,jr���t �', 4: � � ,� �`� ,fir' s fl„,e� , �, ui Y• rxrii}f�.'S,.'.2'r �p rok't-,r, 4ih� pHaaR-x� '�.rry5r."� '`'sS m s `f-"Rv�'���' 1sx"s'-`��F,n`na�k-r'4ti`x'r�'4�Xfi�td'w`�fi ut�F�%4�.�gya`aistS�"•�C Ge'r���a�'���+ ��W' {O? t1 �rf. ,.�..3,.Y i rt 5 '�` tis Cc. �t�>r '� +•���G �h ,�.0 S�tH' .}.',�k'�.,{Y ..x' �r �-��-*�� �,,,n t ��'. rt• ? -�p'�`»r��.q� r+.�'-.. s}�.; r3k +Ya,�.�r��r-#� '� �Gt i'�-�^zi,, 3���. '°'' asp'�£^'^r`k x� ".� ��� 'Vd+�" � F"'c��c,'�^F'�'kS�F�a',X'""�4' '�w m:: "�_ r•� xq� x> .e�tf��kt- 'fin �"-x:r'�N fiF r"4a 1.:.' �"» '< -v� .Err '•s.«m 11 �c5} 7�a .x�rf-':tt'' Sy�'.at�4f .} x f .•�i�k�✓..K$t., s �'"s, .s-�t w S�`' s .tw+„vr, �K�o- ,�''`"`tl�'£� r�v rr d,y�"„/ �z? x i ��3:,(Y`� .rt ..a e�'c��"r�'�"�t k"��r#` z;.• �4+,� �`,,, 4`, �yk��,�'.,F. •tr r �,s�i �.b'1 M'`,K�'i$� ���+��.� X^..t`.G� � �*L1f: 1`1" ''� g !� � Yi'.:f Z'� y '>•r,�Y^'r ..��: r�.q�Ny s -•{ ..�� �a'�,tr' _...'� s ,*J,� � � x �*u..r.�F�Fr'"',�.�, y=f � ,t ,,t dt;:. a �a3.�'F*t �, Ytir,a x F:.. LntG3" ,"n.%'.-S 'v��.L`n - .'`11�P�Lk��'': •.`.��z t s�:.� .�c''+r.-�P�._. �S.+r'u._..�a�..� rn Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 2 Laierflche WebLink- qome, Browse sea To'rmOiSouthcddizmlriBomo(Appeai$qA4-'.I Zoning Board of Appeals ; 710 "IMMIUMS MAIN (ZBA) Alphabetical tnd" a. BoardACOM 7D]Laserfiche Search Guide TownOf5wtlwftRZorurill Boa Meeting5cheriLdes, -fAppezJsCZRN "UnitevAgenclas/LegatNaKes/Hearings creation date 23"wing 711=001 12.17.16PM rC3 Reports- Last rnod1fled 50.3rA1711:07.14AM ra special IN;,;;;aMxS 23 TralgrigRequirem"28kOftials, M1 2HAPokles NO memdata assigned Uf ecceptiore;List Code 280-10CC31 I ZBA Book of Mapped 1977 Existing Lou 189 Schedules Agree­ents.Coffl�&Leases 4.Xli Page Itif I 14 Entries'I 'Above: Listed are types of records under ZBA Folder. ZBA Decisions can be found under Board Actions, Click on "Board Actions"folder to open. A R 1" ;4- V J2 Mz_ 1" g�--,g% Pend' A ,Eb 61 A paw a3 t�eiiviaQ:r�i Madon date Wst nnodlhed i etad- 5 0-1-13,11 No metadata assigned- Aa_#MIS 8606-Bayview br641C 10l)037.5-'l OX *7487 Herd Currier Ea- 1F7387 H4nd Comer-SITE PLAN-Arch,Plans,1000-61-4-11 #738&MIrr.r.,st iinton 1006-128-2-26' #7389 Binicl OCW7144 #7406-Nappa 1000-88&1-1.5 z 1 Page 1 of I Above, Lists all Pending Applications under Board Actions/Pending URL Address, Link is http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0 i t V Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 3 / \ LagerfitheWebLink hVVASr VHi iiI stg utt, Home Bri e'-,search - ToWnOtSouthold>Zoong soardo,TApPea152s/h Board Actions v Board ActionsName Page count t:M 1957-1979 tt ga 19867999 j Path ! —_ TowrKA5otn11o1d120r9ng Board E3.2000 ;t o(Appe&(MM1BoardActions �. � `fir toot 1M - -- - -- -------- Creation date t'' -------`-- ---'----.— --------'---' 7/10RbJ11t21:55 PM R3_2003 ' f Last modified 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------{;p 31=01711:3607AM M 2005 M 2006 No �•K 2007 `---'--— —'----— ---- C i-� Fa 2008 ------'----------`- ----_`- ------- __�_—' 2R 2009 t6 A'wT� 2011 i�` .-1 23 2012 c j l E3 2013 EM2014 fM 2016 - � Pending Above: Board Actions are listed by year. Click folder to open. All Special Exception , applications that require Coordinated SEQRA Analysis are stored in "Pending". ipme� erB«sF,;.staai2l;=r"-„-TL.12PF'dBficld>id'_mng BhwoTMPeals tL(eA1>BoSrdActions>JOti`- 2017 ---..--=:i� y -�t'-V'_ee m'°d _ 'i .> +5 ,"r•.-., E. U7 ii—d^o— Pati ' `�699) 90 Board ApWs of/ypeals QeAA8—d ®7ro1 1Po eaotrdxoom_ Xtlm-n12a17 �- �'OB9 _ __ - be BoaN.cdars ae.0—d— S3 ro.+ as —d— last na h' l41] 73 Bcan1mb m 17 I fi'i➢20:79]GB7 q.M 716 Board MboS -�.alelddbtd'r >Bl6 d3 Board A[9ors Noomtaitta m')te)utl ( Sy 1011 - - )d - - - Board Mom - -- -- ate >6 BoaNANom • I 9,.�t9 SB Board— ; i j g A3t 59 ...-Ibazd�monz • �,�, 13 ____ Boardlabm t ! _ � �j]B). 69 9ard Kabm j 7021 218 Board Nl4B6 P l4>a ]) Bo.dMwm ' �M.9 63 Board Keom ' )92P 3 Board Kaaam • 2'mzlcr . oN na.w.... Above: See listed File Numbers. Click on file you are searching. Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 4 Nv $.......,_ _a� [w r.�.+,..,+'a+w-.o.,...,..:: _ __,_ c-•:inw"•'w'-:w.,'•m .r'u'__ _ (_ k' _- Above: In addition searching by file no.You can also use the above search tool by typing the name or title of the applicant. '4asencrhe Webl.lnka+„ ,M dome, erbwge,- Seq I;CPRomlze'Search +s. - son results by Relevance,v• A i - - _ - _ _ - _ _ dgtvi-•w.. ^8i7 [9 7016 ,�,-."'...._.a_.�>:�.���.��. �E,p?ate• Fldd name .fI( Board Actions-83 pagefs) Choose ftW Ij - i Page count 83 Template name.'Board Actions Page 3 .C911n and Kristen Cashel PROPERTY LOCATION 162 Lower shingle 14I1L Fisher_ sem` l Page a- 192017#7016,Cashel SCTM No.1000-9.1-26 mlromus approval to remo- r Page 5 y 19,2017#7016,Cashel SCTM No 10069.1.26 GRANT.the variances as_. Page 9...COLIN&KRISTEN CASI IEL SECTION 009 BLOC_ Page 20..Thomas Ahlgren(Cas11e1).POBox 342Fishers Istand.NY.- i`— — V Show more information.. ! - j - 1 --^1 97018 j i Board Actions-56 page(s) ! _j Page count 56 Template name.Board Actions a Page 48...930 A.M.COLINCASHELAND variances under ArBde fi SeUlori ANN- , = Page 43.,mce(s)KRI$FEN CASHEL37016-fiequest proposed trellis located In othef[ha- Show more Information_ Above:Shows you files that can be found using a phrase, name or title. Or you can search by Tax Map No. (District, Block and Lot) using the format 1000-111.4-1. F f'n___ ______ __ _ Lase fiche WF bLilik_ �r 1�_�_-•---_—_ _. ' - bfytgetl3nk.1-tic t pbatj`Sli Home -Browse- Search �Town0fS9uthold>ZonIng Board ofAppeals QBA)>Mmutes%Agenbasttegal Notices/Heanngs:y - - -��- - 4cYgrF3' 7Z''' `SERUM,, Mutes/Agendas/Legal u �'.,.. -�'� Sd+a . } Notices/Hearings n 1957-1979 - Entry Propeide's - M 20062009 j Pafh Town0f5outholclUming Board fLLI201D % of Appeals r- ` 2o11 ? (28A)VAnLl u[LS Ager>do-srlegai tdoLresnte rirgz 2012 Creadondate M 2013 7/10/2001 257 40 PM 201a - - -- 1 Last modlfied M 2015 12/1620162.151A PM Fa 2016 1 .2-Meladatd ---'------ M.a 2017 No metadata assigned Page 1 of 1 11 Enh Above:Also, Minutes,Agendas, and Hearing Transcripts can be viewed. Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 5 Laserflche'WebUnk e T ,My1+le6Gi,k 1'Help;i.A66}It 1: .-:T.—._...-...-._-.•-r-' - '- - -..ri, .; Home ^Brow-se'-SearchY :TaNnQtSoath ''2opi' Board otA^�J$ 6A fWnOtes/ enda's/Le I fio " - - ^ ' .r,:'k,'+.:,:'. 1� Ag, ,ga_ tio=5%fieanr>g5_+201,7`.�',::�. ': ' - - __ `F''i: - ..Y.- ,;i+ `•-:-;�..:" >!' _ ,'tit+=' 'f'1°C'.: "�r�+:moi"? a;;, �... �' 2017 'J+?' ` ( Name I Page taunt t1trG,Z13"1ros2_ 017 7 __._----------------------------------------'----- `•", •,` -, ZBA-M/052017Agenda d i Path ZBA01/05/2017 Hearing 40 i TawnOfSmAWd\Zoning Board T CfAppeal5 L.. Q ZB401/052017 LN 3 i (ZBA)\R4In(deslAge7xlas/Legal YOA-01/192017 2 --___,.-__.______._________•—_ _ .________.__ -,! Notkes/Heartngs12017 t" "T^ ZBA-01/19120117 Agenda 2 Creation date 1211620162:15:14 PM ZBA-CW0212017 7 Last modified ��- U1ZBA42l072017 Agenda a `•----„ 1 611912017AS359PIA E••!f __ _ _. __— _ __ ____— __ ___..__ _ Z84-02/VS2017He 45 5 -•..n* 2�ddatr7fs,_v"-;.v; c i f ZBA-07/02/2017 LN 3 r { Q ZBAd7L1162017Agenda 3 ,e No metadata assigned El ZBA-07/1620175pectal _3 pp El ZM-031022017 - 7 _-- +ftnrft! 21 ZBA-03/0212017ftenda 4_ i ®ZBA-a3/022017 Hearing 65 j, kZBA-=022o171LN i =• ` ZBA-03/16=17 Agenda 3 -'-- �� j ZBA-03/1620175pedal _3 ZBA-00/062017 Agenda 4 M �{ W zBA-0a1062017 Heating 45 Above: Agendas, Minutes and Transcripts are in chronological order. Revised 6/15/2020 NCoTlt.oE UF HEARINi� The following application will be heard by the Southold Town Board of Appeals VIA ZOOM WEBINAR - REFER TO ZBA `-WEBSITE FOR AGENDA on httpmm southoldtownny. ciov . 'AME : BERTAULTI VINCENT # 7468SE CTM # mN 1 000-26- 1 - 1 2 . 2 VARIANCE : SPECIAL EXCEPTION r,EQUESTs ACCESSORY APARTMENT IN AN ACCESSORY BUILDING DATE : THURSDAY, OCT. 71 2021 1 : 30 PM "ou may review the file(s) on the town 's website under Town Pecords/Weblink : ZBAI Board Actions/ Pending . IBA Office telephone (631 ) 765-1809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 34 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. `C SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT; • OF In the Matter of the Application of: MAILINGS vtocovk (Name of Applicant/Owner) . . H ..;. . •_ A� - • � �I ,®���/f'b I YSCT'Iv1.No:.1:00(1- -�� x' ,��' ��•-� --� . (Address of Prope (Section,Block&Lot) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK / I, ( Owner, Agent residing at i 1/h ,,41✓1 d d New York, being duly sworn, deposes and says that: On the �day of /�G , 20,;-/,I per$onally mailed at the United i States',PosI--Office in ,.New York, by-CERTIF D"MAIL,, r' RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in Prepaid-envelopes addressed to current property owners shown on the current assessment roll Verified from-the official records on file with the(N Assessors, or( ) County_ Real Pr erty Office, for every property which abuts and is across a public or private-street, or vehicular right-of-way of record, surrounding the applicant's property. (Signature) �S Irnto bo fore me this' da AMY M BEASLEY y ° 20�� NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK Qualified in Suffolk County 0AW - Reg.No.01 BE5039767 jotaryublic) fCommission Expires February 27,20 PLEASE list on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next -------------to-the-o-wner-namcs-and-addresses-far-which-notices were_mailed.-- ------- ----------------- All original USPS receipts and mailing confirmations to be submitted to the ZBA Office along with this form completed, signed and notarized. Ln ru ,i®o frl � '� M .� II o G 1 Qer�°���j��hf > '� � � � Certified Mad Fee s°r! -'y P- Certified Mad Fee d 7e j{9�1 Ir 06 � Er Extra Services&Fees(check box,add tee sl ate) ' Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee g te) ! N ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ -- ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ 0 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ Postmark E3 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ v!,) 4,1I�L-- Postmark ` ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ Here ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ ;j Here []Adult Signature Required $ � []Adult Signature Required $ ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ E]Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ O Postage �_. � Postage p to i i9/17/2�l21 $ I i.7U i 19/17/2 i21 Total Postage and Total Postage and Fees $ E3 $ $7.58 ru Sent To Sonia 0. Gesell Sentro Thomas E. Reinecke& Maria Reinecke 0 0 3treetand Apt.No.,of P�Box IVo. Street and Apt No.,or PO Box o. Ciry,State,zlP+4® Rumson, NJ 07760 ��ryState,ZlP+4e Closter, NJ 07624 7 Riverside Dr. 42 Lindeman Ave._______ ----............ -- ----------- ------------ ---------- ----------------- y rr•�r� J , y,�y,,,,�.,,.,... e o l e e e e e e•, W, g1l: 1101 :11!!q 1r�.7 r° :a oaoAlr ! a• r•r:r �C14o.La:17,� o ' G m ® 0 F© ■ ® e ©ro Ln m ■ 117 !° ® m M 651 {,{ lilt. . Certified Mad Fee 0952 Certified Mad FeeIr $3.75 .7E j{C)cry D-' $ ` 3.75 jadd 06 M $ r c 06 Extra Services&Fees(check box Extra Services&Fees(check box,add tee e { �rQp1 te) RJ ❑Return Receipt(harcicopy)Retum Receipt(hardcopy) $ I I 0 ❑Retum Receipt(electronic) Postmark ReturnReceipt(etecVonlc) $ 11 I� Postmark Certlfled Mail Residcted Delivery Hafe C3 ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ �'i t i r i e Here— (] ❑Adult Signature Required E3 ❑Adult Signature Required $ C�a— Adult Signature Restricted Delive []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ V,, I N Postage j I,t t� C3 Postage 78 u-1 0.73 m $ 09/17/2021 {T7 $ 09/17/2021 ! C3 Total Postage and Fees Total Postage and Fees 17.58 $ $7.58 $ r-9 ti Sentro Ellen J. McNeilly Sentro Lawrence Bernstein ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- O ------- Street andApt.No.,or PO Box Afo. St�eeianilApi iVo.,or PC7 Boz itfo - 70_Vincent__S t--------------------------------------------------------- 20 Vincent__Street_________________________________________________ cstate",zia+a�Orient, NY 11957 city,Staie,ZIP+4® Orient NY 11957 eee r ® •1W�1:�TE THIS SE�qTIQN COMPLETE • ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signature �. 13 Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse e so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. ReAelved by(Printed Name) Date of Delivery t or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Is c 0i ryiddress different from item Yes Attn. Ellen J. McNeilly If YES,enter delivery address below: No 70 Vincent St. - J Orient, NY 11957 +x2, v II f IItIII IIII III �I IIfI I I I II II II I I III II I I 3. Service TyoSignature ' :j `!r f ❑Priority Mail Express ❑Adult Signature ❑'Registered MaliT^e ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery• ''❑Registered Mail Restricted Certified Mad® Delivery 9590 9402 6227 0265 8414 81 ❑certified Mall FigstrlCtell Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTM ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation 2. Article Number(transfer from service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Insured Mad 7021 0350 0002 0944 3350 ❑Insured$Mail Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811,July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt ! — e ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A Signature 0.6dent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X U.Ad ressee so that we can return the card to you. ® Attach this card to the back of the mallpiece, B. R cW(eived by(Footed Na ) C. �o slivery iece p c- lei or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 17 ❑Yes If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No Attn. Brogan Family Irrevocable Trust 2595 Village Lane 1 Rear Orient, NY 11957 I 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail F�cpress® \1 III III I IIII I IIII IIII i I I II II I II i II III IIII III ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MaIITM VV ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mafl Restric IkCertif,ed Mail® Delivery 9590 9402 6227 0265 8413 51 ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Cor' — ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature Cot w itfo 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted; ,ver f I 7 Insured Mail 7020 0640 0001 9 8 7 0 4464 '❑insured Mall Restricted Delivery _ ___ (over$500) Domestic Return Receipt PS Form 3811,July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 I 'v I COMPLETE • ON DELIVERY SENDER. . • . • A. Signature ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. ❑Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse, X rf �// ❑Addressee so that we can return the card to you. yu B ceye d by(Printe Name) C. Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, "K. or on the front if space permits. ' ' D. Is delivery addre different from item 1 Yes { 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No Attn: 220 Navy St. Trust ` I 79 W. 12th St., Apt. 10A j 'I New 'York, NY 10011 I I r v I 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® II I IIIIII IIII I I I I�ILII I I I II II I II I II I I II III III 0 Adult Signature ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mall[I Registered Restricted Certified Mail® Delivery ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmatlonTm 9590 9402 6227 0265 8413 82 ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation 2. Article Number(Transfer from Service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Insured Mail ?020 0 6 4,0 0001 9 8 7 0 4 5 4 9' ❑Insured Mail Restricted Delivery (over$500) Domestic Return Receipt PS Form 3811,July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 . DELIVERY �SENI . • ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A Sign t e Agen4 ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X _ ElAddressee so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, Received by(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits. D. Is delivery address different from item 17 ❑Yes 1. Article Addressed to: ry Attn: Sonia 0. Gesell If YES,enter delivery address below: ElNo 7 Riverside Dr. n � Rumson, NJ 07760 V II I IIII I I III III IIII I I I II II I II I I III II I II III 3, Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® ❑Adult Signature 11 Registered MaIIT" ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mall Restricted NICertiffed Mad® Delivery 9590 9402 6227 0265 8414 43 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTm ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation 2. Article Number(transfer from service label) _ CI Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Insured Mail 7021 0350 0002 0944 3374 -' ❑Insured Mail Restricted Delivery (over$500) PS Form 3811,July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt Property Owners/Information `^ , 26-1-4 ! Q eV,rp Py 'U"511% R� U 8 Ellen J. McNeilly r- Certified Mall Fee d.7 0952 70 Vincent St. P.O. cr `-'6 � PBox 314 � Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add fee ysispp�4pn,ate) , Orient,NY 11957 r-a ❑Return Receipt(haidcopy) $ Q ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ 9*ajjfj Postmark Q Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $' t rj Q0—, Here Q ❑Adult Signature Required $ 26-1-6 []Adult Signature Restricted Delwey$ Lawrence Bernstein P°Stag° 20 Vincent Street o Postage Total Poste andF S !19/17/2U31 , S>1nCV � Orient,NY 11957 C3 $ STMNavy 'St-'---Trust------------------------------------------------- Sweet andApENo.,or PO Box No. ----- 26-1-11.1 `` 79 W. 12th St., A t:__ 10A Sonia 0. Gesell ctry srate,21Aate New York, NY 10011 7 Riverside Dr. Rumson,NJ 07760 , 26-1-12.1 0 Evan Lewis &Lynn Lewis 40 W. 24th St., Apt. 9E Q t— Certified Mall Fee New York,NY 10010 cc $3.75 i X95= Er $ ud Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee a �I I1 I te) 26-1-21 rq ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ I Q ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ kip! 00 Postmark Q ❑CertifedMailRestrictedDelivery $ _ Here Brogan Family Irrevocable Trust Q []Adult Signature Required $---- 2595 2595 Village'Lane 1Rear []Adult Signature Restricted Deliver $ Q Postage, Orient,NY 11957 $ $0.78 Total Postage and09/17/2 21 $ 7Fees.•.0 26-1-24 Sent T rQu `fro an Family Irrevocable Trust _ Thomas E. Reinecke & Maria R. Reineck( Q - -------------------------------------- � Street ana•Apt�.No.,orPO Noz ltfo. 42 Lindeman Ave 2595_Village _Lame_ 1_Rear_ City State,--FX.— --- --- - Closter,NJ 07624 orient, NY 11957 •„•, 26-1-25 220 Navy St. Trust e , - o 79 W. 12th St., Apt. IOA o New York,NY 10011 ! rte,, j Certified Mall Fee Cr $ _$3n75 0952 Q Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add fee p_ ate) - 116 ru ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) ,$ $LU )Ji I - Q ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ d;tom_ Postmark Q ❑Certifled Mall Restricted Delivery $ — Here Q [:]Adult Signature Required $ ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ \ Q Postage �f C3 Total Postage and Fees 09/17/2021 $ :'$7.5u rq Sent To ti Evan'Lewis & Lynn Lewis,, 0F.;&a'na•Apt:Tfo.;of PD N&No.------- 11 -- -- -- , r" _40 W. 24th_-St-.-,--Apt'--9E....................................', - ary,scare,Z/P+4®New York, NY 10010 SENDIER. — • • ■ Completeltems 1,2,and 3. 7Rece!vM s Print your name and address on the reverse ❑Agent { so that we can return the card to you. C ❑Addresscc I ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. y(Pri t d Name) C. Date of Delivery oron.the front if space permits. If�r"UVU— 1. A jijNddressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes 1 If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No Atti;� Thomas E. Reinecke & Maria R. Reinecke 42 Lindeman Ave. Closter, NJ 07624 i Ji II I Illlil IIII III I II IIII IIIIII I I III I VIII III 3. Service ❑Priority Mall Express® ❑Adult Signatureatom ❑Registered MaIITM ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑RNlstered Mail Restricted 9590 9402 6227 0265 8413 68 ve 0Certifiied Mail Restricted Delivery. ❑Signature Confirmation*^+ ❑Collect on Delivery [3 Signature Confirmation _2._Artlole-Number(Transfer from ser_d labs _�_ E]Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery Lc—e/0-00--1 11 Insured Mall- ,'V7020 ail•!V7020 0640 0001 9870 4525 , O Insured Mag Restricted Delivery PS Fpm 3811,July 2020 PSN•7530-02-000-9053' Domestic Retdrn Receipt SECTIONSENDER: COMPLETE THIS ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.— A. Si nature i ■ Print your name and address on the reverse � ❑Agent so that we can returnthe card to you. , EJ Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiege, B• Received by(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery&ddre'ss didi Brent from lihm 1? ❑Yes I -Attn• Lawrence Bernstein IfYES,�ente;deute� dress below: ❑No iI '20 Vincent Street Orient, NY 11957 su I 3. Service Type ❑priority Mail Express® l II I IIIIII IIII IIIIII IIII I I I II II ISI I I II III II III ❑Adult Signature ElRegistered MailTM ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted� i Certified Mall® Delivery 9590 9402 6227 0265 8414 50 ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery E3 Signature Confirmation*^ ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation LI-9 _ArtirlA Number_(Transfer from service label) _ ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Insured Mail 7021 0350 0002 0944 339 8 ❑ nsured Mall Restricted Delivery (over$500) PS Form 3814,=July 2020;PSN 7530-f12-000-9053 1 Domestic Return Receipt I COMPLETE •N COMPLETE THIS SECTIONON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signature 1 ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ❑Agent I so that we can return the card to you. Pa�f ❑Addressee �. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Received b ( rint Name) C. Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits. i1. Article Addressed to: t D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes= If YES,enter delivery address below: El No Attnz Evan Lewis & Lynn Lewis'-'i" 40 W. 24th St., Apt. 9E New York, NY 10010 1 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® ` II I IIIIII IIII IIIIII IIII I I I II II I II I I III I III I I I ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered Ml } I ❑Aduk Signature Restricted Delivery EIRe�lstered Maaill Restricted I 9590 9402 6227 0265 8414 12 Certified Mail® Delivery �? ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirrnationTM ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation 2. Article Number(Transfer from Service label)______ ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery — ❑Insured Mail ?021 0350 0002 0 9 4 4. 3 4 0 4 : ❑over d Mall Restricted Delivery, PS Form 3811,July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt I tdr « s . .� 1i:s:�'�z i' a of� .iJ, h �•. t A + x..!�� o-: 9�;La�x � i - TOWN OF SOUTHOLD J ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF In the Matter of the Application of: POSTING SCTM No. 1000- aG (Name of Applicants) (Section, Block&Lot) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK I, Vincent Bertault residing at 95 Navy Street, Orient, New York ,New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: I am the(>() Owner or ( )Agent for owner of the subject property On the�c��---day of ;42U�1, I personally placed the Town's Official Poster on subject property!located at. _ 95 Navy Street, Orient, NY SCTM#1000-26-1-12.2 indicating the date of hearing and nature of application noted thereon, securely upon subject property, located ten (10) feet or closer from the street or right-of-Way(driveway entrance)facing the street or facing each street or right-of-way entrance,* and that; I hereby confirm that the Poster has remained in place for seven(7)days prior to the date of the subject he ring date,which h date was shown to be October 7, 2021 (Owner/Agent Si at re) 1 Sworn to before me this , Day of• Gheryl `' ��20,-1/ mons Notary Public,State of New York No.31-4970341 Quali Commission x it Suftolk6br County Commission Expires F bruary ---------- (o ary hub is -- ---- ------ ------------- ------------ * near the entrance or driveway entrance of property, as the area most visible to passerby Timothy T Frost Sayhouse 1995 Village Lane Orient, New York 11957 J"i Zoning Board of Appeals 10 June 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building Southold, New York BY HAND/ DROPBOX Re: ZBA Application for 95 Navy Street in Orient Chairperson Weisman and Fellow Board Members: I am a 35-year resident of Orient Village and the owner of 1995 and 2190 Village Lane. Both properties are near the Applicant's property and my permanent residence (1995 Village Lane) is within the sightline of his barn and Willow Street frontage. I am one who believes that property owners are entitled to make changes to their property provided such changes rneet the requirements of the Town Code. However, as site work on the Applicant's property has recently intensified and disrupted the neighborhood, I have grown increasingly interested in understanding the project. To do so I participated in the 3 June ZBA Public Hearing. I am deeply concerned by what is proposed and, based on a subsequent initial review of the available HPC and ZBA digital files on the Town's website, I am shocked. I am shocked by: i.) the scale of what is proposed; ii.) the approvals that may have been given; and, iii.) what I believe may be significant potential administrative and procedural inconsistencies and irregularities by the Town. I will be following up with specific and detailed comments based on a more extensive review of available files, but I wanted to share some initial thoughts and concerns. I recognize that issues related to HPC approval are not directly relevant to the current ZBA application; however, as a starting point, for the record, I believe they should be noted in relation to obtaining permits for work going forward. i Frost Letter--Initial Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navyd� 10 June 2021 K� o The HPC awarded a Certificate of Appropriateness (CoA) to the Applicant to move and restore the barn in 2014. The CoA was for "the proposed relocation of the historic barn and shed, according to the plans submitted, will result in the structures being restored as is...". Changes made to these approved drawings must be approved by the HPC; however, during the 3 June Public Hearing, the architect and lawyer representing the Applicant seemed dismissive about the extent of changes being proposed in converting the barn to an apartment, implying that additional review is unnecessary. Based on the elevations shown by the Applicant's architect at the June 3rd meeting, the changes are Not minimal, with the principal fagade's original sliding barn doors being relocated, and, based on the incompleteness of the elevation, perhaps elinninated altogether.The fact of the matter is that the Applicant has already deviated from the approved HPC drawings of the barn.The West elevation roofline is different, with a straight saltbox- type profile instead of the original profile which combined a gable and lower sloped shed. { The approved WPC drawings show a gentle slope up to the old barn doors on a restored fagade facing Willow Street. What is now being proposed is an asphalt-paved ramp at over a 15% grade. For some reason, the floor of this structure was raised 6" higher than the elevation proposed for the house, even though its original proposed use was as a garage, workshop and storage, not a residence.This anomalous condition is self-created by the Applicant and could have been avoided if the barn had been set back further from the street, or not raised to the extent that it was. This parking ramp will be both unsightly and dangerous. In addition, the Historic Willow tree,whose preservation was specifically mentioned in the CoA, is now shown as being removed to make way for the new parking ramp. Finally, a new willow tree is proposed to be planted over a dry well... which is a recipe for disaster. The high masonry walls that are currently under construction were not submitted for review by the WPC even though walls and fences are components that require review. If the current building permit,which was slipped through the Building Department without HPC review is based on the grading plan, any walls or fences not indicated on this plan would be subject to review by the HPC. In addition, according to the plan Filed into the record on June 4th, it appears that there is a 4' vertical slat fence being placed on top of a wall that is 4'4" above grade on an adjacent owner's side of the wall. This would create a wall of 8'4" which does not meet code. The WPC has not reviewed or approved any alterations to the shed structure/future Pool Cabana. 2 t Frost Letter--Initial Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 10 June 2021 As stated previously, I will be following up with specific comments regarding the current ZBA applications based upon a comprehensive review of available ZBA and HPC digital files, as well as a continuing review of more complete and updated digital files and information, as such is and should be -- made available. Thank you for both your consideration of this matter and your service to the Town and residents of Southold. Sincerely, /s/ Timothy T. Fro 1 i /ttf cc: Scott A. Russell —Town Supervisor Bill Duffy—Town Attorney Mariella Ostroski —Chairperson, HPC ' r 3 Thomas Ryclanan&Pamela Wilson-Ryclanan 1405 Village Lane RECEIVED P.O. Box 606No 7 Orient, NY 1 `1957 ��'�1 1 tryckman@stanford.edu;pamela622@mac.com 2021 Zoning 415 730-1216;415 897-8994 $� � .00,F°�P6 peals i June 12, 2021 I Zoning Board of Appeals RE:ZBA Application 7467&7468SE Town of Southold 95 Navy Street, Orient Town Annex Building P.O. Box n79 Southold, NY n971 ` Dear Chairwoman Weisman, and Board Members, We are recent home-owners in the center of the historic district in Orient;over the past winter, our plan to renovate our garage as an artist's studio received HPC and ZBA approval.We were tremendously impressed with the deliberate and careful process by j which both HPC and ZBA treated our application:notices for community input were posted well in advance,the public meetings were well advertised,interested neighbors were provided every opportunity to voice their opinions, or objections.The entire procedure proved transparent and equitable;we came away regarding it as an instructive _ civics lesson and a model of local democracy. t From many conversations with our neighbors and new friends in Orient, several of whom border the property of the ZBA applicant at 95 Navy Street, and others, not bordering but residents in the Village vitally concerned with preserving the unique character of Orient Village,we have come to the conclusion that somewhere during the protracted building project at 95 Navy Street, such a fair and equitable process as we experienced last winter did not occur.We believe this to be an oversight, largely explicable by the long time period over which the 95 Navy Street project has been conducted, but also perhaps by the simple fact that the owner appears to have taken the reins into his own hands,presenting the relevant agencies with a fait accompli. We strongly urge the ZBA to reach a decision regarding the applicant's request for an exemption from the Town Code that is compatible with the surroundings of the property, with the character of the neighborhood, and with the Village in general. i Si nce�rPly. i Thomas Ryckman&Pamela Wilson-Ryckman Fuentes, Kim I From: Sonia Gesell <soniagesell12@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,June 14, 2021 9:11 PM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: [SPAM] -Vincent Bertault property at 95 Navy street June 11 , 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals` Town of Southold JUN 1 2021 Town Hall Annex Building Southold, New York BY-® ®® WA*- I am the property owner at 255 Navy Street, Orient. My property is adjacent to ZBA applicant Vincent Bertault at 95 Navy Street. This project began In 2014 when I believe ZBA and HPC approval was given to relocate and restore a historic barn and shed at the above location with stipulations which included the preservation of some holly trees and the iconic willow tree located on said property. It is now 2021 and the barn has not been fully restored to the original style and approved use as a barn and boat storage, the holly trees are gone and the iconic willow tree looks in jeopardy. The main unheated cottage on the property looks in disrepair with a shipping container/dumpster next to my property for several years now. Work has recently begun on a wall a few inches from my property line whose height, function or finished appearance has not been made clear. In the process of digging a trench for this wall the roots of all the trees and bushes along my property have been damaged. I stand to lose these trees which provide privacy screening and shade to my property. There seems to be plans for an apartment in the barn, a pool and cabana, a major addition to the cottage, a new grading plan, a new septic system and a new water management installation. I am not sure what further impact this ambitious project will have on my property. Although I am most interested in having Mr. Bertault complete the improvements to his property, he as well as the surrounding neighbors deserve all regulatory agencies to provide coordination, clarity and consistency in granting further approvals. I am asking the zoning board's careful consideration in interpreting and enforcing the laws and regulations meant to protect all property owners and the historic village of Orient. Subsequently, I would hope that Mr. Bertault would provide proof of good faith by complying with town regulations and by providing compensations to neighbors negatively affected by his proposed project. Sincerely, Sonia Gesell r Fuentes, Kim From: Linda Rice <lindacrice@me.com> Sent: Saturday,June 12, 2021 2:10 PM �, To: Fuentes, Kim �c ��� J E' Subject: 95 Navy Street Orient - Linda Rice 425 King Street#15 ORIENT, N.Y. 11957 917-821-0535 lindacrice@mac.com � Begin forwarded message: From: Linda Rice<lindacrice@me.com> Date:June 12, 2021 at 1:47:24 PM EDT To: kim.fuentes@town.southol.ny.us Subject:95 Navy Street Orient Orient is a distinct neighborhood with a history of preservation and respect for size and appearance of its properties. 95 Navy Street has been an eyesore for at least 2 years. Highly visible piles of earth,tree debris,yard waste,trenches, and a front porch covered with items. The look of the property is similar to an unruly dump site. The condition of the property does not belong in any residential neighborhood. Linda Rice 425 King Street#15 ORIENT, N.Y. 11957 917-821-0535 lindacrice@mac.com ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 1 a, l� JUN 2021 B Y. -7 _ Rls� r June12, 2021 William J. Kanz,Jr. 1775 Village Lane, P.O. Box 1 Orient, NY 11957 Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Zoning Board Members, I am writing regarding the ZBA application concerning the construction at 95 Navy Street,Orient, NY. I recently attended the 3 June 2021 ZBA Public Hearing and an earlier Historic Preservation Commission held January 2021. 1 have lived full-time at my present address in Orient for about 50 years and have made every effort to accurately preserve the historic nature of our home. My wife, Nancy and I were pleased when the Orient Historic District was created.The overall changes in the 95 Navy Street are very extensive and out-of- character. It is my belief that if the Historic Preservation Commission and the ZBA approve additional residents making such extensive changes to their properties,it would not be accurate to call this the Orient Historic District. As I walk by the site most days, I am disturbed by the concrete walls being constructed around much of the property.Were these walls, if required, submitted to the Historic Preservation Commission for review? Also consider that this project has dragged on for many years and two weeks is a short time to give the public to submit written comments before the 17 June ZBA meeting.As an aside, in the future consideration should be given to requiring the addition of three-dimensional plans for such extensive changes to a property.The two-dimensional plans are complex and difficult for the general public to comprehend. I suggest that the ZBA consider compromises and changes more in keeping with the historic character of the Orient Historic District.Considering how long this project has gone on, I suggest requiring a time frame for completion of the renovations. On a personal and specific level, most days I drive around the intersection of Willow Street and Vincent Street.Due to the limited parking available and workman's vehicles,sometimes I have had to back up due to the street being blocked.The ramp being proposed for access to the barn from Willow Street will add to the congestion and may entail safety issues. I suggest consulting with the Southold Highway Department.They will have to plow snow in the winter. I am submitting the letter because of my love for this village where we brought up our family and I am concerned about what may happen in the future. I believe the ZBA also has similar concerns. Please allow more time for research on compromises. Thank you for your service to the community. �_, ., -(tia•—, ._ _ j�� Sincerely, JUN I x. 2021 �1 William J. Kanz,Jr. BY. - S -N 7 Timothy T Frost Bayhouse 1995 Village Lane Orient,New York 11957 RECEIVED 13 June 2021 JUN 14 2021 140 g5� Zoning Board of Appeals ®ding Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building Southold, New York BY HAND/ DROPBOX Re: ZBA Applications for 95 Navy Street in Orient Chairperson Weisman and Fellow Board Members: I am a 35-year resident of Orient Village and the owner of 1995 and 2190 Village Lane. Both properties are near the Applicant's property, and my permanent residence (1995 Village Lane) is within the sightline of his barn and Willow Street frontage. This letter is written as a follow up to my previous letter of 10 June based upon a more thorough review of Laserfiche digital files currently accessible on the Town's website and other available information. For ease of review by the ZBA, although there is significant overlap and commonality of issues, I will attempt to categorize my comments as they relate to the Applicant's separate variance applications. Specific Comments to ZBA Application #7467 (the "Mouse") I will start at the beginning... 1. County Mandated Restrictive Covenant Missing from Property Deed: The property transfer deed of 28 June 2005 between the Applicant and the former owner of 95 Navy contains language with respect to compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law and the cost of improvements. Presumably this language relates to the previous owner's subdivision undertal<en in 2005 prior to the sale. A review of the files associated with the 2-lot subdivision states that the Suffolk County Department of Health Services would grant approval "subject to the following conditions... A covenant shall be provided, in language acceptable to the County Attorney, that the approved lots shall not be further Frost Letter—Supplemental Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 14 June 2021 subdivided and each lot is limited to one-single family residence only with accessory uses as may be approved by the Town of Southold". (Memorandum, dated 22 November 2004, from Stephen A. Costa (Chairman, Board of Review) to Brian L Harper (Commissioner, Suffolk County Department of Health Services). Unfortunately, and inexplicably, the language of this required restrictive covenant is not part of the digital deed available on the Town's Laserfiche. I would respectfully suggest that the nature of the covenant restrictions requires time for appropriate investigation and review with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and the Office of the County Attorney. 2. Insufficient Detail Regarding Pool, Pool Surround, and Mechanicals. General understanding of specifications for pool, pool surround ands location of mechanicals should be made available and reviewed by ZBA prior to issuance of a variance and submission of detailed specifications to the Building Department. 3. Visible, Unscreened Location of Pool. At the June 3rd meeting the Applicant's architect and lawyer claimed that the pool will be screened for privacy. While no pool fence was indicated on the plans shown on June 3rd,there is now a site plan submitted on June 4th that shows a hedge with hidden wire fencing. It calls for a four-foot-high hedgerow in front of a retaining wall and the grade on the pool side of the retaining wall is almost four feet above the base of the hedge. This would provide no screening at all at the southeast corner of the pool. Because Navy Street slopes up, and the pool is raised up four feet from natural grade, it is likely that the pool will also be visible from Navy Street. 4. House Setback--Adding to and Expanding a Non-Conforming Condition. There are no site plans that show the location of the paved street in relationship to the property, so it is difficult to gauge the proximity of the house to the street in judging whether a variance should be granted for the location of the house/new wraparound porch. The Applicant's attorney submitted photographs of many houses with wraparound porches but there are scant few that are as close to the street as this one. The inclusion of the new porch section wrapping around the corner at the east side of the original house serves no practical function. The fact that the existing house is set back less than three feet from the property line does not mean that this nonconforming condition should be expanded. 5. Inconsistent, Ever-changing and Different Document Submissions to HPC and ZBA. At the June 3rd ZBA Public Hearing, a public participant pointed out that the elevation drawings on the ZBA Laserfiche (specifically referenced as "Bertault— HPC Revised Elevations 03.11.21 received 5-21-2021")were incomplete and, inadvertent or not, misleading in that such drawings did not delineate "New/Existing" features on the North 2 V,to4^y;;.i,.-i j•._ Frost Letter—Supplemental Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 14 June 2021 or South elevations. The public participant also highlighted and noted that such elevation drawings did not adhere to what is an industry practice of distinguishing such "New/Existing" features by use of color contrast for the shingled outer-walls. On June 4th the Applicant's architect submitted "95 Navy St ZBA Area Variance with Approved HPC Updates" which confirms the public participant's point and shows that the industry practice of color contrast of outer walls to distinguish New/Existing features—although used in the 12.15.20 elevations --was inexplicably omitted from the 03.11.21 revisions. Today, almost two months after the HPC approval vote for the Applicant's Certificate of Appropriateness (CoA),there is wholly incomplete digital documentation on HPC's Laserfiche as to the basis of such approval, which, I would also note, was done without appropriate public hearing. To add further insult to injury, and as was pointed out in my initial comments to the ZBA (Letter dated 10 June), the high masonry walls that are currently under construction were not submitted for review by the HPC even though walls and fences are components that require review. 6. "Seasonal Dwelling" as Permanent Residence: The Town's 2015 Certificate of Occupancy (Coo) for the house (Z-30982) is for a "Seasonal Dwelling" and the entry under "Type Heat" is "None". In submissions, Applicant has claimed his dwelling as his "Permanent Residence", but, with a Seasonal Coo and the limited electrical usage shown in submitted documents, doubt is raised as to the Applicant's claim that this is his permanent residence. In addition,there is not a need for the Applicant to occupy the barn during the renovation/expansion of the "Seasonal Dwelling" he may be mischaracterizing as his permanent residence. Specific Comments to ZBA Application #7468SE (the "Barn") 7. Removal and Replacement of the Historic Willow Free: Modified plans show the removal of the historic willow tree for which the street is named. —1 he maintenance of such tree was a condition of HPC granting the CoA in 2014. Granting of the variance would, require the ZBA to set a precedent of seemingly "stepping on the toes" and over- ruling conditions mandated in the HPC's 2014 CoA. This tree is essential to the historical landscape and is needed to soften the visual street view of the relocated barn now sitting atop a foundation 4-ft above street grade. S. Proposed Parking Ramp and Driveway on Willow Street is Unsafe:The placement of a ramped parking area and driveway on Willow Street is unsafe. The adjacent neighbor's existing driveway is located on a curve. The proposed location of the ramped driveway would create conflicting access to the two driveways on the curved road. There is no reason to knowingly and intentionally create such an unsafe condition, especially one heightened by the slope of the proposed parking area and driveway. The Applicant 3 Frost Letter—Supplemental Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 14 June 2021 should not be allowed transfer his own vehicular traffic and the impacts associated with Jt upon an adjacent property owner. And owner enjoyment should not justify altering ;the character of-the existing neighborhood, imposing the burden on to adjacent properties simply for the Applicant's "enjoyment". 9. "Driveway Pitch Scheme" is Inaccurate: On June 4t"the Applicant's architect filed this document in response to concerns raised by the public at the June 3rd ZBA Public Hearing. Posted on the ZBA's Laserfiche several days later, it depicts a rendering of the ramped driveway/parking area between Willow Street and the entrance to the barn. It is flawed, inaccurate, and, inadvertent or intentional, misleading, as follows. The drawing accurately notes there are 25 feet from the barn structure to property line.The trench drain at the base of the ramp is a minimum of one foot ' in width, allowing only a 24-foot run for the base of the ramp to the barn. Base elevation at property line is, as stated in this and drainage plan, 4.7'. The Ground Floor as stated in previously submitted plans is 8.6', not 8.0' as stated in this rendering. As submitted, calculation of slope/grade is in error. Mathematical calculation of the angle at the ramp base is 9.269 degrees, not 7.125, as shown in the "scheme", resulting in a slope or grade of 16.32%. Parking, entering and exiting a slope of this grade drop presents a clear hazard to ' both pedestrian and vehicular traffic 10. ZBA Variance Should be Conditioned on the Need for New HPC CoA: Although the fenestration appears to align with that of the original barn, the old windows have been removed. Therefore, HPC needs to review fenestration details for any exterior work as it is within their jurisdiction, and a new application and CoA will be required. Therefore, a new HPC CoA should be a specific condition for a ZBA variance and issuance of any building permit for the barn. Common and Overlapping Comments to Both Applications 11. Poor Precedent to Grant Waivers When Sound Alternatives are Available.The proposals before the ZBA for both the house and the barn are NOT the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the Applicant both to enjoy the use of their property and, at the same time, to preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood as well as the health, safety and welfare of the community. There are reasonable alternatives to the proposed plan that achieve the Applicant's desires and provide for far greater compliance. If alternatives exist, ZBA should consider them rather than setting the precedent of granting multiple waivers when there are sound alternatives. 4 Frost Letter—Supplemental Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 14 June 2021 12:•Alternative Parking Space Solutions are Available to Applicant: The parking space in the barn and the one opposite the "Wood Shop" which`would necessitate the removal of the Historic Willow Tree can easily be accommodated, on grade, on the Navy Street side of the property. In addition to being a far safer alternative than parking, entry and exit on a steeply sloped (16.32%) ramp. 13. Alternative Single-floor Compliance Available to Applicant: With the barn/parking space alternative highlighted above an additional approximate 354 sqft is available on the first floor. Applicant can easily accommodate the proposed 302 sqft proposed living area on the second floor by using the freed-up space on the first floor so that single floor compliance can be achieved. The footprint of the barn is sufficiently large (approximately 800sgf of interior space) to house an apartment on the ground level, and any hardship involved in restricting it to one level is self-imposed. The floor plan filed into the ZBA Laserfiche on June 4t" indicate a full one-bedroom home with a double height living room. This is neither in the spirit nor the letter of the Town Code. Allowing a two-story accessory "apartment",which is in this case a one-bedroom home, on a property that is less than half the required lot size in an R-40 district is not a good or welcome precedent. 14. Need for Objective, Specific and Measurable Criteria for"Conditioned" ZBA Approval: Given the long history and uncertainty as to the specific meaning of past approvals relating to 95 Navy, if the ZBA were to grant approval, consideration should be given to conditioning such approval based on specific, clear, objective, and measurable criteria. For example, with respect to the historic willow tree, which the Applicant now proposes to remove and replace with another willow tree, consideration should be given to conditioning such approval. As shown in the Applicant's current plan, if the ZBA were to grant approval, such approval should be specifically conditioned on the replacement tree being of equal size (height and caliper) to the tree it replaces. For the avoidance of doubt-- and the comfort of all —specific, clear, objective, and measurable standards are necessary and warranted. 15. Approval Conditioned on Posting Completion Bond: With respect to the barn, given the amount of time that has passed since ZBA/HPC approvals in 2014 and the failure to "preserve and restore as is", prudence suggests the posting of a completion bond may be warranted. 16. Increased Impermeable Coverage of Lot and Reduced Absorptive Capacity: Under Town Code the allowable" lot coverage" is 20%. The Applicant's plans indicate an increase in existing lot coverage to 17.2%. However, applicant is adding many impermeable fixtures to the property (steeply ramped asphalt driveway, enlarged and 5 ' w r f•: Frost Letter—Supplemental Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 14 June 2021 n relocated "rain garden pond", extensive bluestone/paver walkway, lengthy runs of multiple retaining walls, etc.). These impermeable fixtures and the proposed additions to the residence and accessory cabana structure, in combination with the proposed extensive back filling and grading of the site, will significantly reduce the absorptive capacity of the applicant's property and should require a more detailed analysis by a professional hydrologist. 17. Plans for Review are Not Signed and Stamped. Several of the pians, particularly those related to drainage and septic appear to not be signed and stamped. Final Comments Will the variances requested produce an undesirable change to the character of the neighborhood? Let's face it—undesirable changes have already occurred with the destruction of mature trees and in introduction of tall masonry walls and fences. The addition of a second horne, with improperly screened front-yard pool and the expansion of the porch would only add further insult to injury What's done is done, and what once was an approximate one-acre lot with a permanent residence, seasonal dwelling, and barn has now morphed and, on a lot of less than half its former size, is now proposed by the Applicant to include: i.) a permanent residence, ii.) barn/garage with an accessory apartment, iii.) pool; and, iv.) an accessory (cabana) structure. This represents an intensification of use that overwhelms the site. In its deliberations, I have faith that the ZBA will fully consider the Applicant's proposal considering the specific findings and determinations required by the "Use Regulations" set forth in 280-13 B. (13) (k) of the Town Code. Specifically, for many of the reasons stated in these comments,,and those of adjacent landowners and neighbors, I trust,take comfort, and do not believe the ZBA can objectively make the following specific positive determinations required by the Town Code with respect to the Applicant's current proposal: ® 280-13 B. (13) (k) [1] ... that it "will not adversely impact the privacy and use and enjoyment of any adjoining parcel". ® 280-13 B. (13) (k) [2] ... that it "will not adversely impact the character of the neighborhood in which it is located". a 280-13 B. (13) (k) [3] ...that it "will not have a cumulative adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood". 6 z , Frost Letter—Supplemental Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 14 June 2021 © 280-13 B. (13) (k) [5] ... "that sufficient off-street parking exists on the subject property to accommodate the proposed accessory apartment". 0 280-13 B. (13) (k) [6] ... "whether adequate buffer yards and screening can and will be provided to protect adjacent properties from possible detrimental impacts of the proposed use." Despite the foregoing, if somehow the ZBA were to grant variances for the currently proposed house, pool and/or accessory apartment, I respectfully request ZBA consideration that no work be permitted to proceed until a master plan including All relevant proposed improvements is granted a Certificate of Appropriateness by the HPC and approved by the various other Town agencies and the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. The existing piecemeal approach has only exacerbated the problem for all concerned. In addition, with the continued addition of amended plans to the ZBA Laserfiche, If the hearing is "closed", I would also respectfully request ZBA consideration that the record be kept "open" so that additional public comment can be submitted prior to ZBA rendering a decision. In closing, whatever your decision, I want to thank you for both your thoughtful consideration of this matter and your dedicated service to the Town and residents of Southold. Sincerely, /S/Timothy T Fros - i /ttf cc: Scott A. Russell —Town Supervisor Bill Duffy—Town Attorney Mariella Ostroski —Chairperson, HPC 7 3180 Orchard Street PO Box 473 EZoning 4 2021 Orient,NY 11957 631-323-3501; 631-276-8958 of fA�`�� June 13, 2021 pp�ofs To: Southold Town Board of Appeals Re: 95 Navy Street—Bertault Application The Orient Historic District was officially designated in 1976, aligned with the celebration of the Bicentennial. It has been a source of pride and has offered a sense of participation in the rich history of this small place at the end of Long Island for generations of Orient residents, whether descendants of the founding families or "incomers"who have made Orient home. Like all historic districts it is also fragile, and its preservation has had to rely over the years not only on the dedication of those who chose to live in and preserve the historic structures, but also on a patchwork of legislations rethought and revised over the years,to greater or lesser success, as development pressure has increased throughout the East End. The community has confronted two very troublesome applications within the last year, both of which would have unalterably transformed the integrity of the District. Thankfully,the first has been resolved, but only after much anxiety and activism on the part of the community, which had been brought much too late into the discussion, defying a significant element of the relevant Town law. The same appears to be true with this application, which presents perhaps the greatest threat to the cohesion and sense of place that the district has faced. Whether with the approval of various committees or without it, work has been proceeding which, if allowed to stand, will create the greatest intrusion into the atmosphere of the district that we have seen. It should be stopped. The application has revealed one issue related to the district which must be addressed up front in a unified way. That is the means of dealing with a potential rise in the waters of the bay without elevating the buildings. Such elevation would completely destroy the integrity of the historic landscape, and the issue cannot be addressed piecemeal. As I have pointed out during the discussion of the house on Skipper's Lane, Orient (formerly Oysterponds) was a community of working people. The owners of large farms and the successful whaling captains built relatively large homes on the Main Road, but the village itself consisted of relatively modest homes of carpenters and shopkeepers, seamstresses and innkeepers, fishermen and shoemakers. Needless to say there were no swimming pools; whether they should have been permitted at all in the district is a serious question, but at least the insistence on placement in the rear of the house lends some visual protection, and certainly no variances should be given. There are no walled properties in the district; but the installation of a major wall around this property is in progress. If it has been approved by Historic Preservation, I think the community deserves an explanation. If there has been no permission, a stop work order should be issued. It is an entirely alien element and destroys the cohesion of the district. There should be no approval of a ramp to a garage or other alterations to the existing ground level. The Historic District is no place for an elaborate vacation home (with a "cabana"!), two pools (?), and a ramped parking garage; it is a mockery of the integrity of the district. A comparison with the old photograph of the simple house and its tree is poignant. There is plenty of land in Orient available for the sort of development this application proposes. There is no justification for permitting it in the designated Historic District. There will continue to be the kind of pressure on the district that we are seeing if the Town and its agencies do not agree on meeting it with not only strong regulation but also strong resolution. Also,the community should have an opportunity for early input on all committee decisions, as per the,legislation. It might also be a good idea for the Town to create a clearly written guide laying out the specific restrictions of the district, which realtors would be required to give to potential purchasers. The Town should also consider more collaboration between the various committees in addressing all of the contributing factors in a coherent and unified way rather than piecemeal. The problem will only become worse, and we are in great danger of losing an invaluable and irreplaceable sense of place. Sincerely, f' !��, � (R�a� Fredrica Wachsberger cc. Historic Preservation Committee; Planning Board Ryan Sullivan 1855 Village Lane P.O. Box 4 RECEIVED Orient, NY 11957 SUN I�'/�.� � 2021 June 14 2021 Zoning 80 rf �4ppeaIs Zoning Board of Appeals - Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25/P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 ZBA Application 7467,;&7468SE Filed 12/21/2020 95 Navy Street,Orient NY 8CTIVI_#-1000-26-1-12:2 Supplemental Submission Dear Chair Weisman and Board Members: I am writing as a concerned neighbor and Orient resident regarding 95 Navy Street. I live a few houses away on Village Lane, and have watched this property devolve from a charming local summer house to a sporadic and years-long construction site. The owners have shown no consideration for the neighborhood,its quality of life,or our valued trees. Although I don't usually contribute to discussions about my neighbor's property ambitions,this project has compelled me to do so. It has been carelessly stripped of mature trees with no good faith effort to preserve them. The sudden erection of concrete retaining walls around the permitter of the property has alarmed me and my family enough to write a letter of concern and opposition to this outsized project that is out of step with this village's character. During the June 3rd ZBA Public Hearing we learned about the proposal of adding a pitched driveway which would exit on to Willow Street. We have serious safety concerns'about this proposal. This is a quiet block enjoyed by children, adults and JD pets alike, and the addition of a FOURTH driveway on to a go-degree bend in this road is unquestionably dangerous. As I've delved into this years of discussion and submissions regarding this property, the conflicting proposals on file are concerning at best. I admire and respect the work and dedication it takes to maintain a historic district and it's rigorous review process, and although I have rarely felt the need to involve myself in opposition to anyone's property dreams,the scope of this project has compelled me to do so. Living in a historic district means we all make sacrifices—we don't all get to build big extensions or suspiciously change the purpose of our historic outbuildings for our personal pleasure—it is indeed a sacrifice but it worth the effort to maintain this special town for generations to come. Sincerely yours, 1 - i Ryan Sullivan 7 y Ryan Sullivan 1855 Village Lane P.O. Box 4 fE:EIVED Orient,NY 11957 JUN?74 7 4 2021 � June 14,2021 ping L32,14car 1-1�6 of Appeals Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25/P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 A Application 7467&7468SE iled 12/21/2020 95 Navy Street,Orient NY SCTM#1000-26-1-12.2 Supplemental Submission Dear Chair Weisman and Board Membe I am writing as a concerned neighbor and Orient resident regarding 95 Navy Street. I live a few houses away on Village ane, and have watched this property devolve from a charming local summer house t a sporadic and years-long construction site. The owners have shown no conside tion for the neighborhood,its quality of life,or our valued trees. Although I don't usually co tribute to discussions about my neighbor's property ambitions, this project ha compelled me to do so. It has been carelessly stripped of mature trees with no goo faith effort to preserve them. The sudden erection of concrete retaining walls around the permitter of the property has alarmed me and my family enough to rite a letter of concern and opposition to this outsized project that is out of ep with this village's character. During the June 3rd ZBA Public Hearing we learned about the proposal of adding a pitched driveway which would exit on to Willow Street. We have serious safety concerns about this proposal. This is a quiet block enjoyed by children, adults and Kathleen K Becker 154 King Street POB 151 Orient,NY 11957 631-323-1326 917-743- 7176 kkbkmet@optonline.net / June 14,2021 �k,`�� Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold \ Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 - P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: 95 Navy Street- Orient Chair Weissman and Board Members I am writing this letter as a concerned full time resident of Southold Town of 27 years. The changing landscape and character of the various towns and hamlets in the Town of Southold has been accelerating with new development and renovations creating precedents that are forever altering the character of Southold Town,all under the watch of the various agencies and departments responsible for enforcing regulations currently in place. I certainly understand that change is often inevitable and there is a proper place for variances when there is a justifiable "hardship" aligned with a matching"relief". The "discovery" of the North Fork along with other market forces has increased construction activity and there are many more applications for a range of private property improvements --- each and every one trying to squeeze the most value out of their property to offset their investment. The pressure and burden have fallen on the Town's staff and volunteer Board members,a dedicated group that is in badly need of additional resources and support. Is there a coordinated system of communication within the Town between its own departments and with the public regarding projects to engage early on during the process to ensure that there are not unintended consequences due to lack of action or oversight. The Laserfiche (which requires training) and the website calendar is all the public has and the inconsistencies and incomplete materials does not inspire confidence in that the public record is fully transparent. The ZBA June 3rd public meeting for 95 Navy Street was less productive for exactly this reason. Lessons need to be learned from the failings associated by the 95 Navy Street. If the leaders of the Town don't make efforts to manage the "success",we will lose what makes the North Fork special, magical place. Kathleen Becker 1 1� S Variances at 95 Navy Street—The Gift that Keeps on Giving Regarding the 95 Navy Street project,I understand that the current owner was the beneficiary of the first variance granted represented by the subdivision of the property,and therefore was fully aware of the property's development constraints. With a design background,Mr. Bertault envisioned a broader plan for the site and based on a very weak "hardship" case,and the insistence that his intent was to restore and preserve, both HPC and ZBA granted another variance to this property which dramatically increased its value at the expense of the community. The relocation of the accessory structures set the stage for yet a third variance request,and if approved,will represent the cumulative transformation of the property, and in effect,a large gift from the Town to a property owner whose benefits are excessive and again,at the expense of his neighbors, historic Orient, and the community at large. I do remember the community opposition'to the 2014 decisions and so many of the issues and concerns are being repeated today and may again be overlooked. And yet,the owner who was so committed in his intentions, as stated by Gary O'Conner,the project architect, at the end of his letter dated March 13, 2014 below,tries to explain away is current lack of commitment. In closing, l would tike to reiterate that the rational to relocate the barn resides with the Owner's started goal of restoring; the barn, eliminating vehicular traffic adjacent to the house/across the septic system and for the simple pleasure of creating quality open space in the center of the Property for gardening and the Owners enjoyment. The back-pedaling in his March 22, 2021 letter to dismiss factual observations (not conspiracy theories) and to justify the current variance request, shows the maneuvering and distraction that weakens the Board's ability to maintain a sharp view of the details of the case,the underlying"hardship" (if any), and the cumulative history and impacts at the property. Below,the March 22, 2021 letter to the ZBA by Mr. O'Conner,the owner's architect: IIs. Selally is ranaldrng false aectatioms ilnat tesriruotty gut en to the Boit d in 2011 t cs:ts disingenuous and part of a larger plot to mislead the.Board. Our statements regarding barn use were true in the time and dace where Vincent was%%rith the property.but time and circursnstance change, both indic i&aily and em ironmentally,causing plans to nroive and change tvinich Ms.Ellen has no understanding or_concern about„yet she has a conspiracy theory about a Luger nefarious plot to ruin her conumttnity. If anything,Mr.Bertault has taken the time since getting,the Barra relocation A visit to the site shows this is now no longer a preserve, protect, restore,project in character with the historic district it is in,but a non-historic barn with no trees left as stipulated. r Attached is a sample of the community concerns in 2014 Kathleen Becker 2 Ito The ZBA,with all its authority, must be the "firewall"as one community member said at the hearing in this case in particular. Yes,it is true,we all were fooled by the owner and naive to think that"restore and preserve"was his top priority. Aside from recognizing the violations associated with the 2014 decisions,the cumulative impacts to date must inform the upcoming ZBA and HPC decisions --- determinations and conditions that stand firm and are aligned the law and balanced with the interests of the community in mind. Respectfully, Kathleen Becker Enclosures CC: Historic Preservation Commission Building Department Town Board Town Trustees Kathleen Becker 3 pmw^ biligeselliftmailcom � SoWom esnTmcr#67u ADate, April 2,2015 1:03,38 PM soT To, <,rm,D@mnnuomnvw.o»us> � 1mtecmnp,*44 4 K » Peter, |have been in contact with,Damon and hesuggested|contact you with myconcerns. I own the property located at 20 Vincent St.,Orient.My property adjoins the Bertault property located at 95 Navy St. Yesterday my neighbor informed me that a tree service company was in the process of removing two holly trees.The holly trees and the willow tree,for which Willow street is named,were topics of discussion at several Zoning Board and Landmark Preservation meetings last year.Mr Bertault stated that he would preserve the willow tree and relocate the holly trees.The drawings used toget the building permit reflect this. Yesterday,myneighbor asked the tree service representative,who was in the process of removing the holly trees,why he was removing the trees.M9neighbor was |nformedthotK8rBertau|twas provided with aquote for relocating the holly trees and Mr8m+oultdecided that this -was tnexpensive and the trees should baremoved. Myconcern|swhat will K4rBortau|tdnnext.Doesn't hehave anobligation tufollow the plans the town approved? To be open with you I opposed Mr Bertaults request for a variance and relocation of barn forthe following reasons. 1. 1 felt that relocating barn would change the historic character of Orient.The barn has been in its current location since late 1860.Over 50 Orient residents agreed with me and they signed a statement to this effect which I submitted to the Landmark Preservation Committee. Bottom line is that the Landmark Commission approved relocation so this issue is closed. 2.Myproperty ismcorner lot with limited access tostreet.Relocating barn and providing access tnK4rBertauk's property from Willow St.will restrict vehicular access to my property.If Mr Bertault parks a car at the end of his driveway I Vill not have vehicular access my proper.Mr Bertault said he would not do this but only time will tell. 3.The latest drawing|obtained show that the relocated barn height will exceed code and will not comply d side yard set back.The Zoning Board of Appeals did not address these issues. The 2BAonly addressed the relocated barn setback from Willow St,,which was the reason the Building Department originally rejectedpermit.|might-point out that the plans approved by the ZBA are not the same plans used by the Landmark Preservation Commission.The major difference isthe floor elevation uf the relocated barn was raised from 7tnDft.See attached for details.|had en architect review plans and she agreed with my concision that the maximum code height will be exceeded if foundation is raised tu8ft, |reques that you review plans and reach your own conclusions regarding height and side yard set back issues mentioned in3above,Please let me know what you conclude and what can be done to insure compliance with all applicable codes. I also do not understand why the Town feels a decision is valid when the information used by each group Involved in the decision process isdifferent. Thanks for your attention tothis matter. Bill Gesell 732-616-9005 _�� June 14, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals EIV ® Town of Southold SUN 4 2 2 021 74 Town Annex Building Z0n109 Board Appeals P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA Application 7467 & 7468SE 95 Navy Street, Orient Filed 12/21/2020 Dear Chair Weisman and Board Members, I am long-time resident of Orient, owning the historic house at 29S Village Lane. I feel strongly about the value of the Orient Historic District,but I do believe that it is fragile and endangered. Inappropriate new building over time can so erode the nature of the district that it will no longer seem historic at all. This proposed radical alteration of the property between Nave and Willow Streets is an ill-considered transformation of a quaint simple historic home into a modern-looking vacation compound. The community was relieved when in January of this year the HPC denied the application for a Certificate of Appropriateness, only to be shocked to learn that secret backroom negotiations between the applicant's attorney and the town attorney resulted in an approval in April. There is strong feeling that since this deal was struck without public input,it was possibly done illegally. It is my understanding that the only recourse to a denial of the CoA by the HPC is an appeal to the Town Board and if that appeal is denied,to the state courts. That process was not followed in this case. That secret back room deal was unsavory and erodes confidence in the transparency of the local governmental process. This application before you, even with HPC's blessing,is still a threat to the "character of the neighborhood in which it is located." That quote is from the Town Code listing considerations that the ZBA is to consider in granting special exceptions. By raising the level of the ground so high behind retaining walls,the compound will tower over the neighboring properties; it will be out of scale to the historic homes surrounding it, changing the "character of the neighborhood." Another issue that is addressed in the Town Code is parking. The applicant has proposed placing all three parking spaces on the Willow Street side of the property. That has resulted in a plan to park one car in the "barn"with access by elevated ramps from Willow Street. Several problems with this proposal could be solved by placing one parking space on Navy Street. That would allow the other two to be on ground level off of Willow Street. Thus there would be no need for the ramps, and no need for the accessory apartment to be on two floors. Another problem with this plan is the raising of the level of the overall property behind retaining walls. This elevation could easily have an "adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood" (another criteria that the Town Code mandates to be considered in granting special exceptions). When the inevitable storms come,the properties surrounding this newly-elevated property will be standing in even deeper water, especially the property on the bay side. The retaining walls certainly will interrupt the flow of water, potentially causing even worse flooding in the neighborhood. Has there be a proper hydraulic study of this rather radical plan? Why not just raise the house but not the entire lot? There are numerous problems with this proposed transformation of the house and property,but I will address only one more. The request for a two-floor apartment in the "barn" should not be granted. The "barn"will become, for all practical purposes, a second house on the property. By making slight alternations inside the building, such as adding a door here or there, the woodshop could become a living room, transforming the structure into a complete two-story house. Requiring that the applicant limit the accessory apartment to one floor guarantees that the apartment stays within the proper bounds. Besides,who designs an apartment with two floors for an elderly relative? This construction project has been ongoing for many years,which has made it very difficult for its Orient neighbors to follow the twists and turns. At this time,with so much done with such confusion, I see no reason to grant any special exceptions. Maybe it is high time that the applicant follows the rules, rules which protect the historic character of the neighborhood. Thank you for your attention to this most complicated problem. Orient is relying on your good judgment. Sincerely, Charles Dean 295 Village Lane Orient, NY, 11957 crdorient@gmail.com ' � f REeEIVE® JUN 4 2021 2� To: ZBA officials �®���913oard OfA�5,gppeals From:Jane and Sam Lear Date:June 13, 2021 My husband and 1 bought our house in Orient about seven years ago, and fell so much in love with the low-key, rural character of the place,we decided to make it our fulltime residence. But things are changing rapidly out here, with little thought to the aesthetic and/or environmental consequences of your decisions, and it fills us with great sorrow and, yes, anger. That monstrous house on Narrow River Road that permanently destroys the view shed for all is one egregious example. And the "barn" on Willow Street—with its elevation FOUR FEET above the neighboring properties, proposed two-floor accessory apartment, and creation of ramps up to an indoor parking garage—is another. How those radical changes to the fabric of the historic district—and our community at large—can be allowed to move forward is shameful and an abdication of the responsibility of the ZBA. Before you make any further decisions on the matter, I have a suggestion: In addition to studying all the various plans and schematics,why don't all the board members take a drive out to Orient and take a good, hard look at the property and how it relates to the neighboring houses and overall community?Then keep going along King Street until you reach Narrow River Road and take a look at the new house there. It's too late to fix what is gone forever along one of the prettiest country lanes in the Northeast. It's up to you to prevent that sort of thing from happening again. Sincerely, Jane and Sam Lear Richard Hoblock 595 Navy Street RECEIVE® P.O. Box 114 � Orient, N.Y. 11957 U 4 2 21 richardhoblock@gmail.com � j (310) 508-5394 Igoar oT ��ppe' Zon►ng June 14, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals RE: ZBA Application 7467 & 7468SE Town of Southold 95 Navy Street, Orient Town Annex Building P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Chairwoman Weisman, and Board Members: My husband and I chose to live in the village of Orient because of its unique character, gentle landscapes, and balanced scale, knowing well that the established town requirements and restrictions are to keep it sensibly intact for future generations. We live at 595 Navy Street and have a direct line of view on what we believed was to be a renovated historical barn and home. We have watched in shock and dismay as rebuilding and landscaping of the property at 95 Navy Street and the back of the property on Willow Street has expanded into what appears as a reckless permutation of established norms of local barns, land elevations, and village homes. What has oh-so-slowly evolved over the years has absolutely no regard for surrounding properties, landscape elevations, tree populations, or common decency. Quite frankly, and since the most recent variance hearing, we now feel lied to and duped. On record, what was to be a "like kind" barn has morphed into an alternative house, labeled as "workshop" and "garage spaces", the envy of any North Fork VRBO rental, with an array of new land elevations inconsistent with everything surrounding this property. How did this happen in this special place, this special village? To have a functioning democracy, one needs honest and well-intentioned citizens with respect for neighbors, not neighborhood policemen policing deceit. After almost two years of being friendly, tolerant, and respectful of our neighbors and their very real property rights at 95 Navy Street, things have drastically turned. The deceit by the owners of 95 Navy Street has become increasingly and sadly apparent over the months and their"development milestones" now wreak of patiently crafted manipulation. We believe in the property rights of the owners of 95 Navy Street and, in fact, would fight for those rights that they hold, however odious we may find them. Yet we strongly do not believe in lies and willful manipulation of neighbors' trust and patience and established local laws. A sad and profound rift in trust has occurred, as well as an increasing blight on our existing homes and communal respect that unbridled and ridiculous ego seems to allow. Is this what we have become and want to exist as in our chosen community? We answer with a resounding no this megalomaniacal development and urge you to carefully consider our lives, neighbors, home and community going forward. Tha OU. Richard Hoblock Resident and Owner 595 Navy Street, Orient s Fuentes, Kim From: Laura Weil <laura.weil@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday,June 16, 2021 8:36 AM - _ To: Fuentes, Kim ' r. �If Cc: EJ Camp �4 �yy Subject: 95 Navy Street, Orient NY- Please Remediate!! U Dear Ms. Fuentes, As a long time resident of Orient,owning 2760 Village Lane since 2004, 1 am writing to protest the construction disaster that is ongoing at 95 Navy Street. It appears to be a ridiculous folly of a plan, with high concrete walls,trenches, elevated ramps for parking and the ever present destruction of beautiful, historic trees that define this once charming area of Orient. It should be stopped,the owners should be fined and ordered to remove the walls and trenches that threaten not only the beauty of this address, but more importantly,the drainage and septic stability of the area. It is inconceivable that the owners of this property could get this ridiculous, ugly and dangerous plan past our Zoning Board and Historic Preservation organizations.Why is it ok to destroy historic trees, build concrete walls, plan parking ramps and dig trenches in the historic town of Orient? How can this project be allowed to continue? It is so disturbing to think of my neighbors whose houses are next to this mess.They must watch this monstrosity of project grinding through in its aimless, disorganized and ultimately, destructive fashion. I know you and the other members of the board work diligently to enforce our zoning regulations so I am appealing to you to do whatever you can do to stop this project and order the residents to return the property to its original condition. Respectfully, Laura Weil 2760 Village Lane Orient, New York ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 1 Timothy T Prost Bayliouse 1995 Village Laine r Aj Orient,New York 11957 16 June 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building Southold, New Yorl< BY HAND/DROPBOX Re: ZBA Applications for 95 Navy Street in Orient Chairperson Weisman and Fellow Board Members: I am a 35-year resident of Orient Village and the owner of 1995 and 2190 Village Lane. Both properties are near the Applicant's property, and my permanent residence (1995 Village Lane) is within the sightline of his barn and Willow Street frontage. This letter is written in response to the Applicant's attorney's letter of 11 June and the submission of revised plans. It is also written based upon a more thorough review of the ZBA Laserfiche which has grown from 7 entries to 19 entries in the wal<e of the 3 June public hearing. I believe it important to review the Applicant's initial filing"Bertault 7468SE Special Exception Application—Accessory Apartment" on the ZBA's Laserfiche considering his attorney's categorization as to what he suggests is "relevant" and "not relevant". As I learned as a child, "claiming it's so, doesn't make it so". For my part, i would suggest what are materially poteniiai errors, omissions, misstatements and misrepresentations in the Applicant's file should be particularly relevant and require further disclosure and review.Several have been noted in my previous letters of 10 and 14 June, but bear repeating considering the Applicant's attorney's claim as to relevance. Several are based on the Applicant's new and incomplete plans filed on June 10th. I call your attention but to some of the more egregious examples. "Bertault 74GSSE Special Exception Application —Accessory Apartment" 1. Interference With Use of, Enjoyment, or Privacy of Adjoining Parcels: In Sections C. (4),the Applicant alleges that the location of the proposed apartment 'would not Frost Letter—Fina| Comments Z8AApplications—9SNavy /�=^ 1GJune ZO21 interfere with the Use of, enjoyment,or privacy of any adjoining parcel". | am not the owner of an adjoining parcel and adjacent owners may offer comments if they chose to. But, | amincredulous inthe wake ofanallegation that lacks credibility, ), theApp|icanta||egesthat "therevvi|| benocunnu|ativaadvecseirnpactaonthe surrounding neighborhood as a result of granting this application". I am an owner in the immediate neighborhood with sightline of the Applicant's property.So, let me be real; I . am incredulous in the wake of another allegation that lacks credibility. In light of the Applicant's newly submitted revised plans, I restate, reaffirm, and respectfully ask you to reconsider what were my final comments in my 14 June submission relating to both ZBAvariance applications: Will the variances requested produce an undesirable change to the character of the neighborhood? Let's face it—undesirable changes have already occurred with the destruction of mature trees and introduction of tall masonry walls and fences.The addition of a second home,with improperly screened front-yard pool and the expansion ofthe porch, would only add fU-rtherinsult toinjury. ` What's done is done, and what once was an approximate one-acre lot with a permanent residence, seasonal dwelling,and barn has now morphed and, on a lot ofless than half its former size, is now proposed by the Applicant to include: i.) a permanent residence, ii) a barn6,aragevvith an accessory apartment, iii\ a pool; and, iv.) an accessory(cabana) structure.This represents an intensification ofuse that overwhelms the site. In its deliberations, I have faith that the ZBA will fully consider the Applicant's proposal considering the specific findings and determinations required by the "Use Regulations" set forth in 280-13 B. (13) (k) of the Town Code. Specifically, for many ofthe reasons stated inthese comments and those ofadjacent landowners and neighbors, I trust,take comfort, and do not believe the ZBA can . objectively make the following specific positive determinations required bythe Town Code with respect tothe Applicant's current proposal: w ZOO'138. (13) (k) [17 ... that it"will not adversely impact the privacy and use and enjoyment of any adjoining parcel", w 2OO'138. (13) (N [2] ... that it"will not adversely impact the character of the neighborhood in which itb |ocat8d". Q 28O-13B. (13) (Io [3l ...that it "will not have acumulative adverse impact , -` FrostLetter—Fina| [bnnments IBAApplications—95Navy 15June 2O2I * 28O-138. /13\ /k6Bl — "that sufficient off-street parking exists onthe subject property toaccommodate the proposed accessory apartment". n 28O-13B. (l3) /N [6] ... "whether adequate buffer yards and screening can and will beprovided toprotect adjacent properties from possible detrimental impacts ofthe proposed use". ' 2. In ' Section B. of the Questionnaire for Filing with your ZBA Application,the Applicant ' indicates there will be changes to the land contours but does not provide a required "attached sheet" to elaborate and "explain", as also required.Since the Applicant plans ' propose significantly raising the grade up to four feet on several areas of his property, | � would suggest this material omission is both relevant and indicative ofthe Applicant's ' propensity toattempt tomislead the ZBAand the public. \ � � 3, Certificate of Occupancy is for a "Seasonal the Applicant includes a x -- Certificate of Occupancy (CoO—Z-30982)for what he claims to have been his "permanentr8Sidence". The CnOclearly sets forth that the existing residence ioa "Seasonal Dwelling" and the entry under"Type Heat" is "None". In addition, in the ZBA application he also provides a notarized affidavit in which he, "being duly sworn, � deposes, says", states "I have resided at the Premises as my primary residence for the � past ten years", As the existing house is an unheated seasonal dwelling, it is simply not � / credible toaccept that the existing house has been his prirnaryresidence for the past � ten years, Furthenmo�,the AppUcantin�udeainNsZ8Afiling acopy ofhis PSEG electric bill showing extremely limited usage over a thirteen-month period. Finally, in apparentxupportofhispornanentresidencyc|airn,theAopUcantiOcludeoo "doctorad" cover page of what I assume we are expected to inFer is his purported 1040 Tax Return ' for 2019, The logical question that arises from this potential charade isthis:Should the Applicant even be permitted to appIV for an accessory apartment before the existing house (i.e.,the "Seasonal Dwelling") has a CoO as a permanent residence since full-time residencV is a requirement for an accessorV apartment, 4. In Part (3.b),the Applicant states that "the total acreage to be physina||ydioturbed" is ".OS acres" (approximately 1OY6ofthe lot). in Part 1 /6\,the Applicant states "the proposed action is consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape". In Part 1 (12.b), the Applicant falsely indicates "the site does not contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic Places. Even a cursory glance at the Applicant's site plan and any awareness of the Orient Historic District reveals the nature of the misstatements and misleading responses by the Applicant. 3 Frost Letter—Final Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 16 June 2021 "Bertault— Documents received from Bressler 6-11-2021" As noted above,the Applicant's attorney attempts to categorize ongoing public comment as "relevant" or "irrelevant". I would suggest this is a specious argument and a blatant attempt to limit and dismiss public discussion and input. I believe public input should be encouraged, accepted and considered for as long as the hearing and record is open for public comment. I would also suggest this is especially important since the Applicant's plans are subject to last t minute change and modification such as those now proposed. The Applicant's attorney dismisses the feasibility of moving the dwelling to be in compliance ;s with Town Code. As we all know, many structures, in far worse condition have been moved, far ' greater distance, over significantly rougher terrain, without damage and adverse consequences. ' In all likelihood the primary risk of damage to the structure is from the initial lifting of the structure, not from the minimal transport distance over currently level ground to a more code- compliant location on the property. With respect to the Applicant's attorney's statement regarding the proposed pool, I have addressed my concerns in my letter of 14 June and, in the interests of time and brevity,will direct your attention to them and not restate them here. However, I take extreme exception to the Applicant's attorney's claim that"the application now meets the requirements of the Town Code because the Applicant has determined to relocate, in part, the parking to address the concerns of the ZBA". Presumably, such a claim is based on the exhibits submitted with his letter. In this instance, Exhibit A is truly of no relevance to the discussion as it is outdated and are plans last modified in 2014 as part of the HPC application for a CoA. Exhibit B is at least relevant in that it is a 6.10.2021 modified plan but I have not had time to thoroughly review. Exhibit C,which the Applicant's attorney purports to be a site plan, raises a minefield of concerns/questions on the newly proposed modifications that require a more detailed analysis and review. Let me list but a few concerns/questions that immediately come to mind: o Rather than providing two parking spaces on the proposed 16.32%grade driveway, the new plan proposes two separate replacement parking spaces—one at the extreme northwest and the other at the extreme southwest corner of the Applicant's property, One concern is the change in grade that will be required to allow the cars to be parked on a level surface given the formerly proposed contour lines of the property. A rough approximation of the spatial constraint imposed on the parking space nearest the barn suggests that there would need to be a 100% , 4 Frost Letter—Final Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 16 June 2021 grade!—a drop of four feet over an approximate four feet (a 45-degree incline!) given that this transition is required as the parking space is contiguous with the driveway ramp. What this suggests to me is the obvious need to fully understand the proposed contour and hydrology results of these newly proposed modifications. o To accommodate the new northwest parking space,the revised site plan also proposes a new stairway, wall and gate to provide access to the property.These modifications,which appear awkward and cumbersome at best, would be visible from the street and should require, and be conditioned on, HPC review and issuance of a CoA. © The revised site plan provides no detail or even outline regarding the ramped driveway; (i.e., Has the driveway been modified?; What is the transition from the ` driveway to the flat surface of the northwest parking space?; etc.). ' I could go on at length, but time is short; so, although my analysis is incomplete and I have many additional comments, I need to cut myself of and submit this letter as is. But, if somehow the ZBA were to grant variances for the currently proposed house, pool and/or accessory apartment, I respectfully request ZBA consideration that no work be permitted to proceed until a master plan including All relevant proposed improvements is granted a Certificate of Appropriateness by the HPC and approved by the various other Town agencies and the Suffolk County Department of Health Services.The existing piecemeal approach has only exacerbated the problem for all concerned. In addition,with the continued addition of amended plans to the ZBA Laserfiche, If the hearing is "closed", I would also respectfully request ZBA consideration that the record be kept"open"so that additional public comment can be submitted prior to ZBA rendering a decision. In closing, whatever your decision, I want to thank you for both your thoughtful consideration of this matter and your dedicated service to the Town and residents of Southold. Sincerely, /S/Timothy T Frost /ttf 5 Richard J Gillooly 75 Willow Street 1� � Orient,New York 11957 JUN N1,21 June 13,2021 zoning Dow(bfr 1 h't Zoning Board off Appeals Southold Town Hall Annex Southold,NY Re.95 Navy StreM Orient;NY My property is across Willow Street access to the subject,has been owned by me for approximately 50 years.I am a full time resident I have attended several hearings over many years regarding the proposed alterations to the subject property,and expressed my concerns at the 2014 HPC hearnn&I objected to the barn relocation at that time in part because there was no complete plan for the site.I was assured that any use would be restricted to non residential,and that the historic features of the neighborhood and the structures would be preserved and the existing willow and holly trees would be protected,This neighborhood has endured years of disruptnon and neglect by the owner and are now witnessing inappropriate and unregulated construction that is drastically changing the character and safety of those of us who live here. We have relied on the good people who sit on the HPC and the ZBA to protect this historic neighborhood and the town ofcnals to uphold the laws,regulations,and safety of the community.This situation is now OUT OF CONTROL. The owner of 95 Navy Street has now even damaged the abutting neighbors trees and screening by cutting the root systems for his walls which were not reviewed by HPC. Avow we are being asked to live with a large ramp as a remedy for poor site planning to accommodate parking for a proposed owner occupied apartment when appropriate parking should have been provided on Navy Street. Any farther action by the Town must be postponed unt d a complete reviews of final plans and specifications,and assurances that they be strictly adhered to and completed on a timely basis. Thank you for your consideration of this difficult situation and your service to the Town and residents of Orient. Sincerely, Cc Scott Russell,Town pervisor Richard J Gillooly 75 Willow Street Orient, New York 11957 �7n ©0 IN June 13, 2021 Zoning Board of Appealsm�® Southold Town Hall Annex Southold, NY Re: 95 Navy Street, Orient, NY My property is across Willow Street access to the subject, has been owned by me for approximately 50 years. I am a full time resident. I have attended several hearings over many years regarding the proposed alterations to the subject property, and expressed my concerns at the 2014 HPC hearing. I objected to the barn relocation at that time in part because there was no complete plan for the site. I was assured that any use would be restricted to non residential, and that the historic features of the neighborhood and the structures would be preserved and the existing willow and holly trees would be protected, This neighborhood has endured years of disruption and neglect by the owner and are now witnessing inappropriate and unregulated construction that is drastically changing the character and safety of those of us who live here. We have relied on the good people who sit on the HPC and the ZBA to protect this historic neighborhood and the town officials to uphold the laws, regulations, and safety of the community. This situation is now OUT OF CONTROL. The owner of 95 Navy Street has now even damaged the abutting neighbors trees and screening by cutting the root systems for his walls which were not reviewed by HPC. Now we are being asked to live with a large ramp as a remedy for poor site planning to accommodate parking for a proposed owner occupied apartment when appropriate parking should have been provided on Navy Street. Any further action by the Town must be postponed until a complete review of final plans and specifications, and assurances that they be strictly adhered to and completed on a timely basis. Thank you for your consideration of this difficult situation and your service to the Town and residents of Orient. Sincerely, Cc: Scott Russell,Town Supervisor 1 RECEIVED � June 14, 2021 JUN 15 2021 G �Std Zoning Board of Appeals Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA Application 7467 & 7468SE Filed 12/21/2020 95 Navy Street, Orient NY SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 Supplemental Submission Dear Chair Weisman and Board Members: We are writing to express our extreme disappointment at what we have been witnessing since 2013, when our neighbors, at 95 Navy Street,first moved their historic barn from its original spot to its current location,just off Willow Terrace. We live at 230 Vincent Street, on the back side of the 95 Navy Street residence and when the barn was first moved, we were shocked. It was one of the most iconic and beautiful old barns in Orient, so to learn that it was being converted into an apartment was upsetting. We, along with many of our neighbors, signed a petition back then in 2014, opposing the change. Our biggest concern was that our tiny neighborhood (Fletcher/Vincent/Willow Street) could not handle another driveway or more cars/traffic. Nothing happened back then. The barn remained in its new spot and then, over years, started to deteriorate. What was once a symbol of historic Orient became an eyesore, upsetting to all of us who walk past it daily. The site was left in an ugly condition for years—with a large mound of gravel sitting right on the property line in the neighbor's front yard,the job partially completed. The neglected site degraded our community experience. Fast forward to the current circumstances: the property looks like a war zone. It began with the barn, which was fortified. At first, we were glad it was finally being taken care of. Then it was raised four feet, which gave us pause. We asked the contractor what he was doing, and he said the town demanded this type of foundation. We thought it was strange,that the barn would be that much higher than all of its neighbors, but imagined a staircase or some sort of access point. To then see trenches being dug,trees being felled as a result (the 80-year-old Copper Beech on the adjoining Lewis property is especially upsetting,though the entire corner has been denuded which gives full view onto the property.) We zoomed in for the most recent ZBA meeting and were frankly aghast to learn that the trenches that were dug were for retaining walls that would be filled,we assume,with dirt to create a slope on an otherwise totally flat parcel. The retaining wall will create a level change with the adjacent properties which will be unusual and speaks to the need for a district wide policy about changing heights of buildings and land to accommodate minimum construction heights required in the flood plain. If this plan for 95 Navy Street is approved,then one could imagine a patchwork of properties at different levels. Everyone in Orient Village who lives near the water will be impacted by raising water. This property(95 Navy Street) is proof that our district needs a community-minded plan. In addition to being completely out of character to have this one property raised on a manmade hill,we were aghast to learn that there is a spot designed for two cars on the back side of the property, on Willow Street,to accommodate the fact there is no parking on Navy Street. This is unconscionable and dangerous. That corner is already crowded. To add another entrance/driveway makes that corner dangerously congested. That the "driveway"would be on such a steep grade would draw even more attention to the manmade grade and would be dangerous given the number of children who play and bike on this corner. We completely REJECT this as a possibility and urge the board to do so as well. Evan Lewis lives on the adjoining property to 95 Navy Street and spoke at the recent ZBA zoom about his concern over the trench and retaining wall. He said that in digging of the trenches on the B95 Navy Street property, that the root system of an 80-year-old Copper Beech that is on his property was severed and that tree is now in peril. This is•a metaphor of what is happening. The complete and utter disregard the owners of 95 Navy Street have for any of their neighbors is striking. As far as code is concerned: the plans for an elevated barn turned accessory building turned two story dwelling are not in keeping with the historic nature of our village. To allow this would set a dangerous precedent that people who have the means to hire lawyers and tear down historic buildings would use to make similar cases. Chairwoman Weisman,you mentioned this during this ZBA meeting and it struck a chord. Now is the ` time to strengthen code to make sure the historic charm and nature of Orient Village is not destroyed by people who want pools and cabanas and water views and more. This particular property has become a great example of a rallying community cry. We were particularly moved to see nearly every single one of our neighbors on that Zoom call—and not one person in favor of the changes proposed other than the applicant. That is the strongest sign that all requests be denied and altered to fit within the community understanding of what is appropriate. Sincerely, Liz and Gideon D'Arcangelo 230 Vincent St. Orient, NY 11957 June 15,2021 RECEIVED JUN 18 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25,PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: ZBA Applications for 95 Navy Street,Orient NY 11957,SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 / •Z� Dear Chair Weisman and ZBA Board Members: My wife and I(Evan and Lynn Lewis)have owned the house located at 2395 Village Lane,Orient since December 2014.We are neighbors of the applicant and owner of 95 Navy Street,Vincent B ertault. As a family we have been coming to Orient for twenty years and I have been fortunate enough to have been coming to Orient since the late 70s.While Orient has changed significantly in the intervening 40 years,I believe the most important parts of our small community have remained largely unchanged thanks to the efforts of Southold Township-including the ZBA-the Historic Preservation Commission,and the permanent and Summer residents of Orient. Moreover,I have watched successful renovations large and small(including some of our own)take place even when the owners and township do not necessarily agree on every aspect of a proposed renovation.I have faith that this can be the outcome at 95 Navy Street.At the end of the 95 Navy project I hope that Vincent and Claudia enjoy an updated,appropriate renovation that better suits their needs while Orient and the community embrace a code-compliant,architecturally accomplished property that sustains and adds to the character of our small village. Relatedly,we believe strongly that any homeowner has the right to renovate and upgrade their property in order to protect and/or improve their investment in the property as well as make it more comfortable and suited to the use that is specific to each homeowner.In any municipality,this is obviously subject to the framework of applicable building/electrical/sanitation/etc.code.In the historic district of Orient Village,all homeowners know that a layer of historic preservation and appropriateness is laid on top of that.Lastly,while not regulated,there is certainly the hope that we are all considerate neighbors while planning and executing renovations that inevitably impact the lives of our neighbors and the way(s) in which they enjoy their respective properties. Our overall concerns about the project at 95 Navy Street are summarized here: 1) The health and well being of the remarkable,mature(50+year old)Copper Beech tree that sits on our shared property line between 95 Navy and 2395 Village Lane.A significant portion of the roots were cut over a month ago(4/29) during work performed on the trench 95 Navy Comments Page 1 of 2 6/15/21 L v U related to the eastern retaining wall.At the writing of this letter,the trench has not been back filled and the roots are still sticking out into the air.I am not an arborist and do not know the impact of this damage.If the damage proves to be catastrophic,an in-kind replacement of a tree of this age is NOT possible.A replacement tree would likely not reach an equivalent size in our lifetimes. 2) Any applications are complete and any/all plans and documents are promptly made available online for public review and commentary following Southold Township's established processes; 3) Upon approval/rejection/revision,the work performed by the applicant and their agents matches what has been submitted and approved; 4) Appropriate landscape screening for any impacted neighbors is a condition of approval/completion.From our property,even in the early construction stages,staring at a four-foot concrete wall on our Eastern border impacts the enjoyment of our property and is at odds with any nearby aesthetics/historic"appropriateness." We are available to discuss any aspect of this letter in greater detail at your convenience.Thank you for your consideration and ongoing work for the residents of Southold Township. Regards, Evan Lewis Lynn Lewis 95 Navy Comments Page 2 of 2 6/15/21 RECEIVED JUN 15 2 21 15 June 20211AWS 5 Zoning Boa a of Appeals Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building Southold, New York Re: ZBA Application for 95 Navy Street in Orient, Chairperson Weisman and Fellow Board Members: We are residents in the historic district of the village of Orient residing full-time at 20 Vincent Street since 12/12/19. The Bertault residence on 95 Navy Street is situated directly on the southern-west corner of our property where the retaining wall construction is underway and our driveway on Vincent is perpendicular to the back of the relocated barn on Willow Street where the projected car ramp is proposed. We have been thoroughly consumed with daily, controversial concerns in what is happening in all matters to us, our neighbors and the gradual disintegration of the vitality of our historic community setting due to the 95 Navy Street application project. First of all, we are in agreement with the 95 Navy Street property owners that they are entitled to make changes to their property provided such changes meet the requirements of the Orient HPC/Southold Town Code. And, as adjacent homeowners, we have been unduly forced to be exceedingly tolerant with the barn relocation/raising, land property excavation, removal of our 6 mature Sycamore maple trees including stumps/roots and the massively intrusive daily loss of privacy typically 6 days week since the project began. However, the direct loss of our mature trees (photo #1), property aesthetic (photo #2) and quality of life with the additional growing concern for the potential negative impact on our property value, land drainage and septic function, has now forced us to strongly question the nature of the approval process that has allowed the retaining wall at the very least to be constructed on such a significant scale. We are profoundly baffled that a such a vigorously, historic-preservation minded Commission that requires HPC approval for a simple property fence has allowed a visible, unconventional, incongruous 4' concrete retaining wall with a proposed slat fence on top without a standard regulatory review in a public hearing forum. In addition to this on-going sense of uncertainty, we are understandably concerned with compensation and remediation for damages as a result of the retaining wall project to our removed trees, lawn, cesspool cover, sprinkler line as well as the appearance of the finished retaining wall fascia design facing our property. The incompatibility of the 95 Navy Street project with key zoning sections of the ZBA Town Code is pervasive throughout its process. To begin with, we are strongly opposed to the projected unconventional parking ramp entering into the elevated barn on Willow. The ZBA is charged with assessing the effect that the location of the proposed use and its entrances and exits may have upon the creation of undue increase of vehicular traffic congestion to assure public safety. We already have significantly compromised traffic in the corner convergence of Willow and Vincent Street. Cars driving east on Willow must already drive with extreme caution when approaching the corner to make the left onto Vincent due to (1) the small left turn in the road, (2) 3 existing active driveways in the corner and (3) possible cars traveling south on Vincent. Increasing the risk for public safety cannot be underestimated at this already hindered intersection on our small, quiet village street location. Secondly, the general standard of storm water management compliance is questionable and how the potential water flow, drainage, flooding and soil erosion on our property will be impacted by the retaining wall has yet to be determined. Furthermore, at no time was the location and impact on our cesspool (photo #3) which is less than 6 feet away from the retaining wall considered. We are highly concerned the retaining wall will impede the proper functioning of our cesspool and impair vital treatment, removal, and/or discharge of sewage that may pose a critical sanitation health risk as a result. Furthermore, we do not understand how the barn which was intended to remain a barn was raised so high and is being considered for apartment use when the HPC awarded a certificate of appropriateness (CoA) to the applicant to move and restore the barn in 2014. The CoA was for "the proposed relocation of the historic barn and shed, according to the plans submitted, will result in the structures being restored as is...". Simply stated, the barn has clearly not be restored "as is." However, regardless of what "restored" means, the permitted use of the projected "accessory" apartment in a "lawfully" existing detached accessory barn, is again in direct opposition with key zoning sections of the ZBA Town Code criteria: (1) That the granting of the special exception will not adversely impact the privacy and use and enjoyment of any adjoining parcel. (2)That the granting of the special exception will not adversely impact the character of the neighborhood in which it is located. (3) Whether adequate buffer yards and screening can and will be provided to protect adjacent properties from possible detrimental impacts of the proposed. Our larger, unaddressed concern is what precisely will that screening be i.e. mature trees? What will the finished wall look like i.e. stone facade? The answers to our on-going questions such as these come in slowly and gradually, if at all. It appears this piecemeal planning approach is strategic and continually leaves the community at a disadvantage who cannot in all actuality stay on top of all the repeatedly made changes leaving the owners of 95 Navy Street at an advantage to make modifications without the community's knowledge and left catching-up once again. Due to the continual public confusion over procedure, frequent resubmissions, and question of what agency (FEMA, HPC, and/or the ZBA) is ruling on the decisions, we suggest a revised, detailed and organized master plan submission for the project in its entirety with a similarly detailed and comprehensive impact statement to all surrounding properties, to once again be reviewed with public comment. Until so, most of the community will continue to be misinformed about the facts and confusion_ will persist as the status quo as will the common denominator of community distress. REcEzvE® JUN 15 x0(.1 2aning Board of Appeals 1 Overall, there has been far too many complicated and changing variables in the 95 Navy Street project application process which not only presents as a formidable task to address here in this letter but to simply keep up with and maintain an operating handle on as an deeply concerned and impacted property owner. Every community member who has visited our property to try to understand the project, and there has been an untold amount, expresses disbelief over what they see. And while it feels unfortunate to be literally in the trenches next door, we appreciate the support and the concern it has engendered in the community. We greatly'trust your thoughtful consideration for all the enormously concerned and actively involved Orient community voices who hope to protect the vitality of our historical village under your dedication and guidance to serve the Town and residents of Southold. respectfully mitted, RECEIVED �ea r c rnstein JUN 15 2021 Marcia Sheldon Zoning Board of Appeals I( i kxTiAD ,ii�r". ^�- _ fie' ,• , lWQc Atw Jw Aix low ±' a r • 1. 1 n ' ii - t y�,� � `►>���i4 - .;*'...'� ,1 .rye - ,:.- . ..awe �'r�„�_ _;.�-' �' .. / t/ -�. �•+� ��_�.: m� � � , ♦ I r! ♦ r � r lS� 1 v - 11, y 9 _ �.y�`-`, ,.'' - '� o!•� � �� `rte..-': =.��x>'� _ _ �., ».�.".• .17 � 'KV ✓i '?h� F.V!•t..':" tF-'4 iy�+,.moi.-.. t �� � �! � ' .f I e w '0 `~ � <4✓,d, by.�� - 77_ r. I s .., .•� .�-, . _ pie . -Fr" mss. _l l • • c s-� tie,, � 'SF.�a•v"�.. � � �_'�Y-. :�, •: i ,, _gym " Jeri Woodhouse JUN 1 2621 825 Village Lane Orient, NY 11957 B' -___________...� 631-834-1816 June 15, 2021 " JUN Zoning Board of'Appeals 7021- ! C Leslie Weisman, Chair - Town Hall Annex Building s Southold, NY 11971 RE: ZBA Application for 95 Navy Street M Dear Ms,Weisman and ZBA-Board Members-, ' I have been a resident of Orient for 33 years and am very familiar with the Navy St property. Originally it was part of a larger�parcel that my husband and I owned which encompassed the House and Garage on the cornet of Navy Street and Village Lane where we lived full'-time, and the cottage and barn-next-door which we used seasonally. In 2004 we applied`to the Planning Board-for per'mi'ssion to sub-divide-the property.,We worked,closely with the-Planning Board-anil'the Suffolk County=Health Department; aii'd�cbnsulted`with the Historic'Pregervation Comihittee'to protect , the historic"cottage and barn In 2005 we received permission to sub-divide the property. As a condition of the subdivision'the Suffolk County Department of Health Service; s- „ � (Division of Environmental Quality-Board of Review) conditioned that"a covenant shall be provided,in language acceptable to the County Attorney,that the'approved`` , lots shall not be further subdivided and each lot be limited to one single family residence only with accessory uses as may be approved by the Town of Southold. " They stated that the need for the covenant is referenced in the property transfer deed to the applicant." In discussion we were told that in addition to no more buildings,-no more wells tould'be added-without Health Department - ' consultation/approval,and none could be in the rear right corner close to the former Gesell property.`Before closing on the sale of the cottage and barn I consulted both with Jim Grathwold about protecting the cottage facade of this historic structure and the Peconic Land Trust about language to be inserted into the deed for a facade easement which I wanted recorded with the deed. As you can surmise, preserving the Historic District and Historic Structures in Orient is very important to me. Even more important is protecting our fragile aquifer and water supply. Both are being severely compromised in the application before you. r Let me comment first that it is almost impossible to comprehend what is going on with this application . Accurate information is difficult to come by. There are two fronts to this property- meetings are only being noticed on one. Information that is needed for the public to understand what is going on has not been readily available, not posted in a timely manner,not accurate from plan to plan,or inconsistent. 111 % Lik The barn is a topic of concern and ramps are being discussed while the barn itself remains under wraps with no way of knowing what has been removed or added, and the only visual does not include a finished "wall". Let me suggest that the plans are not necessarily helpful to figuring out was is going on- I would like to encourage you to request a 3D rendering of the entire parcel And that the existing and proposed lot coverage be also provided. As for the 3 parking spaces,it makes no sense to have all 3 on one side of the property and create a potential dangerous situation for the neighbors on Willow Terrace who have problems parking as it is. Of particular concern is the effect on the Fire Department and maneuvering their trucks in an emergency.. There are other options for the applicant to consider including moving two spaces to Navy Street Side,reducing or moving the garden and having a 2 car parking space to the right of the property facing the back. (As opposed to one space on the left of the house close to the neighbor), Moving the parking from the front of the barn also protects the Willow Tree that is such an important part of the neighborhood.While it is almost impossible to fix what has already been destroyed, anything that can be saved,should be saved. It is our heritage, and how we respond to this application will forever define our future. VeX rulyyours,J iWoodhouse PS. I had an opportunity to read the comments submitted by Tim Frost and Ellen McNeely and I concur with their observations and recommendations. In closing, The house,which was always referred to as the Pernchief Cottage,is a seasonal residence. It is not habitable as a permanent residence and has not been used as such. Jeri Woodhouse JUN 140 2021 825 Village Lane Orient, NY 11957 By-®_______----- 631-834-1816 1T-53,;�7�, June 15, 2021 p JUNf Zoning Board of Appeals 2021 Leslie Weisman, Chair Town Hall Annex Building 4 Southold, NY 11971 _l RE: ZBA Application for 95 Navy Street Dear Ms,Weisman and ZBA Board Members, I have been a resident of Orient for 33 years and am ver- familiar with the Navy St property. Originally it was part of a larger parcel that y husband and I owned which encompassed the House and Garage on the c ner of Navy Street and Village Lane where we lived full-time, and the cottage and am next door which we used seasonally. In 2004 we applied to the Planning Board for ermission to sub-divide the property.We worked closely with the Planni Board and the Suffolk County Health Department, and consulted with the Histor' Preservation Committee to protect the historic cottage and barn. In 2005 we received permission to sub divide the property. As a condition of the subdivision the S folk County Department of Health Services (Division of Environmental Quality-B and of Review) conditioned that"a covenant shall be provided,in language accep able to the County Attorney,that the approved lots shall not be further subdivide and each lot be limited to one single family residence only with accessory us as may be approved by the Town of Southold. " They,stated_that_the_need for the covenant is referenced in the property transfer deed to the applicant." In disc sion we were told that in addition to no more buildings,no more wells coul _ be added without Health Department consultation/approval,and ne could be in the rear right corner close to the former Gesell property. Be f re closing on the sale of the cottage and barn I consulted both with Jim Gr thwold about protecting the cottage facade of this historic structure and the econic Land Trust about language to be inserted into the deed for a facade easem ht which I wanted recorded with the deed. As you can surmise,p eserving the Historic District and Historic Structures in Orient is very important to me. Even more important is protecting our fragile aquifer and water supply. Both are being severely compromised in the application before you. Fuentes, Kim From: Barbara Cohen <bjcohen@att.net> Sent: Friday,April 2, 20214:29 PM To: Fuentes, Kim; elizabethsakarellos@southtownny.gov Cc: Ellen McNeilly; Marcia Sheldon Subject: Bertault - 95 Navy Street / (� Dear Ms. Fuentes, At the meeting this week, it was mentioned that HPC was to review a revised, amended plan submission (enlarged house, shed convert to cabana and new pool) that generated the Denial. However, no date is scheduled for the HPC. Do you have any further information about this? As regards_ the Barn conversion, the HPC has not received an application for this. It originally was part of a grand plan that was submitted to HPC, but then was pulled back and the house/cabana/pool remained as the "amended" application. Clarification --- at the scheduled June hearing, will the ZBA rule on the special exemption application (barn conversion) prior to HPC determining facade and fenestration treatment, particularly since interior use will dictate the exterior?, or will the ZBA await HPC decision on this item as well?. Thanks very much. Barbara J. Cohen BJC Associates, Inc. PO Box 391, Peconic NY 11. 958 X91.7-562-4290 ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 1 Fuentes, Kim From: Barbara Cohen <bjcohen@att.net> Sent: Friday,June 25, 2021 2:38 PM �- To: Fuentes, Kim; Leslie Weisman Forward Cc: Ellen McNeilly I �� Subject: 95 Navy Street - On-Going Construction Plus - �i SUN 25 20213 Dear Ms. Fuentes & Ms. Weisman, BY The following updates the ZBA as to the activity at 95 Navy Street, contrary to what was stated to be the valid permit in place representing only the 2014 relocation of Barn and Shed. A day after the last ZBA special meeting, cement trucks arrived at the subject site. Code enforcement was notified and a temporary stop work occurred that day. In the following days, work has continued. The Laserfiche for the Bldg Dept's Permit Index stops in May 2021 , so verification of current permits is unavailable. A short phone call to John Burke was made and he stated that "there was no stop work order and there were valid permits, and the ZBA was wrong". He then quickly hung up to prevent further questions, particularly as it relates to the violation of the 2014 HPC decision where mature holly trees are yet to be replaced, and the Willow Tree remains in jeopardy. Mr. Burke him self had to come stop the cutting down of the Willow Tree last year. Additionally, as it is the project architect's (intentional or unintentional) sloppiness, I am sure the ZBA has noticed that "Exhibit A" the revised Barn plan submitted by the Applicant shows a title block with the ZBA approved plans from 2013, modified 5/28/2014 with reference to ZBA approval (setback only?, or also barn height change?), and modified 5/28/2014 stating "Per Owner Request - Willow Tree to Remain". The Barn height in Exhibit A � w shows 18'-9", contrary to the Dec 15, 2020 plan that shows the alteration Barn height of 19'-7". IV066 The ZBA Laserfische 2014 files show the decision allowing the Willow Street setback modification and references the project architect's letter dated March 13, 2014 and there is a stamp "Final Map Reviewed ZBA 4-17-2014" . No Plans dated 4-17-2014 are in the digital file to fully understand what was approved by the ZBA. The language of the Grant suggests only the setback modification permitted. Meanwhile, the HPC 2014 decision that followed the ZBA decision referenced the last amended plan on 6-11 -201.4. No Plans that match the HPC decision are in the Laserfische files, again, no clarity of what was approved. Since there is no current CO for the completed 2014 relocation that would verify by Bldg dept as to alignment of the completed work and approved plans, it would appear that the above would suggest that the increased barn height was not approved by either HPC nor ZBA, yet it stands there today. The Applicant's lawyer states the SE application is now in compliance; however, it would appear that an additional waiver would have to be added to permit this extra height (although not stated), as it was built without a permit with the presumption that two levels of living space was to be approved. If the ZBA or bldg code does not limit the method of access (ie. pull down ladder) to the storage second floor to prevent living area and the full sized stairwell remains and ZBA approves the extra Barn height, then Applicant achieves all that he wished and strategically planned for. Goes without saying, the community is confused with the mix messages, incomplete digital files and generally upset with the 2 Applicant as "bad neighbor" and the multiple approvals that relied on Applicant statements and narrow scope of each application. Anything to assist in the community's fuller understanding would be much appreciated. Barbara J. Cohen BJC Associates, Inc. PO Box 391 Pecon ic, NY 11958 ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 3 L 1 Fuentes, Kim From: Sonia Gesell <soniagesell12@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, October 2, 2021 9:02,PM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: [SPAM]'- 95 Navy Street Orient IFET u October 1 2021 � 4 2021 Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building ', . ^ gar bfpeals Southold, New Yorko�t►�►9 Dear members of the Zoning Board of Appeals, This is a follow up to my letter of June 11, 2021 (included below) I am once again asking that the zoning board provide careful consideration in interpreting and enforcing laws and regulations pertinent to the variances requested by the homeowner at 95 Navy Street, Orient. A decision in a timely manner is of utmost importance to me, other neighbors and I am sure to the owner of said property. I have been impacted for too many years by this project begun in 2014. If the applicant is not in compliance with the 2014 HPC Certificate of Appropriateness for the existing accessory barn and the fence/wall surrounding the property has been constructed without a C of A then the zoning board should take this into consideration in their decision to issue the requested variances. Once again I am asking for coordination, clarity and consistency among all agencies in regards to this project. I trust that the town will provide the necessary supervisory oversight to protect the property rights of homeowners while enforcing building codes, regulations etc. For the safety and welfare of all residents while also keeping the character and integrity of the historic village of Orient. Sincerely, Sonia Gesell 255 Navy Street Orient, NY June 11, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building Southold, New York am the property owner at 255 Navy Street, Orient. My property is adjacent to ZBA applicant Vincent Bertault at 95 Navy Street. This project began In 2014 when I believe ZBA and HPC approval was given to relocate and restore a historic barn and shed at the above location with stipulations which included the preservation of some holly trees and the iconic willow tree located on said property. It is now 2021 and the barn has not been fully restored to the original style and approved use as a barn and boat storage, the holly trees are gone and the iconic willow tree looks in jeopardy. The main unheated cottage on the property looks in disrepair with a shipping container/dumpster next to-my property for several years now. Work has recently begun on a wall a few inches from my property line whose height, function or finished appearance has not been made clear. In the process of digging a trench for this wall the roots of all the trees and bushes along my property have been damaged. I stand to lose these trees which provide privacy screening and shade to my property. There seems to be plans for an apartment in the barn, a pool and cabana, a major addition to the cottage, a new grading plan, a new septic system and a new water management installation. I am not sure what further impact this ambitious project will have on my property. i )D I- 7 I am Charles Dean, living full time in the Orient Historic District at 295 Village Lane. While Mr. Bertault's property at 95 Navy Street is a few blocks from my house, I am here to request that the ZBA recognize that this property is in Orient's Historic District and that your board act accordingly. Had this property been outside of the district,there would unlikely be such an uproar in Orient about Mr. Bertault's plan. The Historic Preservation Commission has notified in a letter to Ms.Weisman,as chair, and to the members of the ZBA,that the applicant is not in compliance w' the HPC's Certificate of Appropriateness for the barn. The roof is several fe over the approved height,the proposed doors are not a single barn door,and�eo concrete wall has no Certificate of Appropriateness. The HPC is charged wt approving changes to the structures in the Historic District, but the applica h94 ignored the agreements that allowed the barn to be moved. I firmly believe that�P �O�I variances of any kind should be issued for 95 Navy Street until the proposed plan iso-�,� in compliance with the 2014 agreement. I see no other way to ensure that the HPI 10;0 decisions concerning this property are followed. As far as I know,they have no i enforcement mechanism of their own. The HPC did not mention the issue of the use of the second floor of the barn since internal construction is not in their purview. But one might assume that the roof was raised to allow sufficient ceiling height for a living space. With stairs to the second floor,the ground floor accessory apartment becomes a large two-story rather grand house. The ZBA should not issue a variance for this construction until the roofline is lowered to the approved height, and the plans changed so that a dropped ladder is the access to the attic storage area. Otherwise,the "storage" area will be storing a sofa,chairs, a TV, and whatever else to make the salon floor comfortable. The most egregious flaunting of the town's rules is the construction of an entirely inappropriate four-foot concrete wall enclosing a significant portion of the property. The HPC does have to approve fences and walls in the Historic District,and they have not issued a Certificate of Appropriateness for the wall, and it is unlikely that they would issue such a certificate. Unfortunately,the wall has been practically completed in a rush before the Stop Work Order was issued. This wall must be removed. If allowed to stand,it will transform what was a quaint section of the Historic District into something so modern—a raised oasis with a cabana,pool,and an extra guesthouse--that the district will be forever damaged. Raising the ground level several feet and the roof-line of the barn several feet has created a monster building out of scale to the neighborhood over which it will lord. The ground should be returned to the proper level and the barn's roofline lowered. Allowing this applicant to flaunt the rules of our town and then be offered "forgiveness"is a sure way to guarantee that the Historic District is doomed. Thank you for your time and your service to our community. Charles Dean To: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals From: Fredrica Wachsberger ���� I a" a'� Re: Vincent Bertault application#7467 This is the second recent attempt at an inappropriate incursion into Orient's hist'ric ,,• district. In the first instance, a house on Skipper's Lane,no destruction had t � ace, and the issue was satisfactorily resolved, with great effort,I may say, by the commu �®� - An appropriate renovation of the property is now taking place. X09. • S Here we face,a different problem,which is the implementation of a plan that is entirely alien to the historic landscape, and which is being implemented without proper approvals by the Town departments and without the community input that is expressly required by Town legislation. The resolution of this particular issue will create a precedent for future, inevitable attempts to disregard the essence and the details of the Town's Historic District legislation. I believe we are at a watershed moment with extremely high stakes for the future,-not only of Orient's Historic District but of h'istor'ic districts throughout the Town. Permitting the implementation of this plan would mean the end, in my opinion,.of any,reliable protection of the historic districts. Issues like the relative importance of preserving the historic character of the district versus.the potential impact of rising-water levels, an issue introduced in this application, should be,a subject of Town and community discussion and agreement rather than left to ad hoc individual board decisions. This particular application represents a gross transformation of an emotionally moving relic of"old Orient" into something unrecognizable in any historic district in Town, and the swiftness of the execution of this design before the acquisition of the necessary approvals by the Town and expressly against the wishes of the community now will call into question the willingness of the Town to enforce its own.legislation. The Town must insist on the reversal of work that has been done without proper permission from the relative agencies, including and especially demanding the removal of the wall, which has been built without prior approvals and represents the most egregious incursion into the historic_landscape. (I have been at meetings of the HPC where the exact nature of wooden pickets was discussed--let alone a wall!) The integrity of historic districts and the balance between.historical realities and contemporary living requirements.clearly needs to,be the subject of serious community discussion and collective agreement, and there must be clear guidelines given to realtors to share with potential buyers-as to what will be considered permissible. The resolution of this particular incursion into the Orient-Historic District should become an example of the Town's commitment to preserve the historic relics of our Southold communities, and not an invitation to future buyers to destroy them. �q� Ire rica Wach's'b�r g - Ellen McNeilly PO Box 314 Orient NY 11957 631-323-3989 ejmcneilly(@earthlink.net October 20, 2020 Historic Preservation Commission Edward Webb, Chairman Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 - P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Application Dated 7/15/2020 95 Navy Street, Orient NY SCTM # 1000-26-1-12.2 Supplemental Submission Dear Chairman Webb and Board Members: The following serves as a supplemental submission to the letter and materials dated September 26, 2020 providing key documents to support my position on the above application. As of today, the second amended application that was provided solely in hard copy by the applicant has yet to be made available for public view.' Prior to the public hearing on Oct. 22"d, I hope to be able to review what will be discussed and modify any comments made below I strongly urge the Commission to rely on the 2014 decision to inform the review of the current application, as the same concerns relating to architectural appropriateness and restoration as well as the preservation of historic landscape features are at the heart of this amended application. 1 Public Records request was made on Oct 1, 2020 for the following and to date, have not been provided: BUILDING DEPT:Building Permits Issued:#39186-Z(9/15/2014);#41328-Z(1/30/2017),#44198-Z(9/23/2019)and subsequent permits issued as result of any approvals by HPC and ZBA of current applications under review.;Copy of Johnson Tree Co.letter dated July 30,2014 as part of HPC Cert.of Approp.June 18 2014; If applicable-Notice of Disapproval of Amended Plan under current review at HPC dated 9-15-2020;Certificate of Occupancy subsequent to current dated June 15,2005-CO nbr Z-30982. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Copy of covenant referred to in SC Dept Health Envir.Quality letter dated Nov 18, 2004 associated with ZBA#5218; Any permits and/or code violations relating to environmental quality, particularly sanitary systems,given that infrastructure work has been performed at the subject site. CODE ENFORCEMENT:Online"Town Code Complaint Form"notification made March 12,2020,but received no reply nor action;All Code Enforcement Reports:(1)specifically relating to 2014 HPC Cert.Appropriateness on or about 9-11-2020; (2)Code violation reports since 2005. Ellen McNeilly 1 The Applicant's disregard to the directives in the 2014 decision and the strength of the Commission's authority matter greatly to the community and its trust in the Town's advocacy for the people they serve. Simply put, non-compliance "bad" behavior should not be rewarded. / Architectu I a Integrity and Significance WHEREAS, the proposed relocation of the historic barn and shed,according to the plans submitted,will result in the structures being restored and preserved as is,and The single-family house, the accessory shed and the accessory barn can all be viewed from either Navy Street or Willow Street and therefore are the Commission's concern. Single Family House: As has been pointed out by the Commission, the enlargement expressed by the tower element with cupola for a dining area shows little historical reference or - inspiration. The Applicant's priority for a first floor bedroom is __•F „�,q ________ achieved without this unnecessary double height "dining room". Accessory Shed: Although the recently adopted Town Code may allow for a change of use to a pool-cabana with other -_ enhancements, the existing 180-+ square foot shed is sufficient for that purpose. The proposed enlargement alters the building envelope making it unrecognizable as as a historic, accessory shed. Again, I urge that the Commission should stand firm to its 2014 decision that the accessory "...structures be restored and preserved as is." Accessory Barn: It is clear that the Applicant's desire is to convert the Accessory Barn to an accessory apartment with the anticipation that the building would undergo an extensive renovation, not restoration. Since 2014, the Applicant has _ subjected the Accessory Barn to a level of self-created disrepair. The long delay in restoring the roof framing and cover and the unfinished restoration puts the building in further jeopardy of being lost. Whether or not the ZBA will permit a change of use, I urge the Commission to re- state its directive to restore the existing structure. The fenestration system of the existing Barn provides ample opportunity to satisfy any use. Historic character will be lost if continued neglect leads to a future request for a dramatically different architectural treatment, rendering it essentially a new building. Ellen McNeilly 2 Landscape Features Holly Trees Destroyed — Need Replacement WHEREAS, the applicant has agreed to make a good faith effort to pmserve the property's existing tmes and shrubs(particularly the holly trees)during the relocation process,and No "good faith effort" was made to preseve and relocate two, large, kt ,i �,11 mature Holly Trees due to the approved relocation of the accessory barn as directed in the 2014 decision. e'rmn I urge the Commission to require a modification of the amended plans to show Holl tree replacements on the subject site p Y P 1 J specifying a mature size, planting plan, and a timeline for planting. Willow Tree to be Preserved WHEREAS, a letter was submitted to the Landmarks Preservation Commission on July 34, 2014,by Michael Johnson,of Johnson Tree Co.,Orient,outlining how to protea the willow tree adjacent to the proposed location of the barn structure.The letter will be part of the applicant's final building permit application and,it appears that the project requires no further review, The amended plans note that the mature, historic Willow tree as Existing Willow Tree Trunk" suggesting the tree is dead. It is well documented F ;'f that the Applicant has neglected and made multiple attempts to destroy, not "preserve" as directed in the 2014 decision. Jonathan Shipman, a Certified Master Arborist, in the letter dated September 14, 2020 verifies that is "thriving". The Town's Code Enforcement has addressed the issue, but to date, the report has not been made available. I urge the Commission to require a modification of the amended plans to show an accurate depiction of the historic Willow Tree, and reiterate the important of preserving it. Any future use of the Accessory Barn may require some pruning, but not full destruction. Ellen McNeilly 3 Evergreen Screening for Proposed Pool Evergreen screening along the property line should be required in order to block the view and buffer the noise associated with the proposed pool, particularly as it relates to Mr. Lewis' adjacent property. Thank you very much for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, Ellen McNeilly Resident and Owner: 205 Willow Street (Taxlot 26-1-4) 70 Vincent Street (Taxlot 26-1-5) Ellen McNeilly 4 Subject Site Navy Street Cottage and Willow Street Accessory Barn Accessory Shed Not Shown — Located in Interior of Lot fF , is Single Family Cottage — 95 Navy Street Al WE1 Accessory Barn — Willow Street Frontage Fall 2020 Ellen McNeilly IV (1 ; NORTH (WILLOW t�'" ' / ' ' ,�VIA:.�.✓ 4 • s; _--ra = u.s ��� , ( \ December 2020 Ellen McNeilly Willow • • March 2021 Ellen McNeilly _. rf i' / + ► � rf f / � Adsk� 20121 WMES I POST HPC 2014 DECISION RELOCATE 18" HOLLY"=DESTROYED; AREA— 19,905 SQ.FT $j ,1 44"WILLLOW=NEGLECTED BUT VIABLE STRE MLAR W MAL TO IvILL0 7 WASIPAW2 Wf ffPMMr "C 65 93' 51,0w WELAICATE N85*28 ',r, N "N WOW MIER" "E 54 f-S WN.0,214 FL 4.9' STcCKAtE FE. CP A 9 1-2 5 SHED IVIPEE Lot @ L (D 0 Is 8"IfICE ;*t- 1,/2 m ! FPAe {fedi EL . 114 M PaND " 22 6, 24* CEDAR 0-F41, - I gL" 4t1 s' *L�50a YARD UVLAOIN 7- 13'-MEE WSPRIJ4CE-v1�7"y 2 STS �Z I STRW L �Ca FRWE- M 40 FWC% 2rtM 2 Ot "W 7) 0-w S86",8,20 STF"EPET A. Vy 11972 UTWMMM 12,231? Subject Site Survey dated September 2012 Ellen McNeilly I , i WILLOW STRE T AREA OF CONCERN N8 .. ._ EL 4.2' 5°28'3(re93, EL.5Z REGARDING TREE REMOVAL. pr COMPLETED SANITARY INFRASTRUCTURE SHOWN UATFOM z i t r �;t S s2TdtY. i tEttlYv"W.uAr fe.:* �z Pa'?AtClikp t.LY.M i xu ` e t uLOW ts i .�x.�'HKHtf:S3fjtG YK, bfA �k t ;r ;tea PAN R.CsR�. fr• � F i EA � ,m Y Vim R /�JATUM ! �3i:,i3II w WALLd.� . i "`1 A�OdhSLGLf t Wf?RC1X.1 ! ED to •� ig cra mte� t 1 �• T ft9 f i iRt4i\^rGS RitLC:.�P S82`4EMM 17.86* NAVY STREET sus 18ao7n+" a.7�' - IROPOSED FILL SITE PLAN Source: HPC Amended Plan — 9-15-2020 Ellen McNeilly K ~S 5 Yy rty> _ .e.+k• 71 " ` ft;:�.• 5..��� a moi' }•' _ 'i March 2020 - Tree Removal — Willow Street Property Line — Proposed Fencing/Retaining Walls - Cause for Concern Refer to McNeilly Letter to HPC — September 26, 2020 for further details regarding the illegal removal of mature Holly Trees and the neglect/attempts to remove the historic Willow Street and its viability according to master arborist evaluation. Ellen McNeilly 4 Ellen McNeilly PO Box 314 Orient NY 11957 631-323-3989 ejmcneillyaearthlink.net March 15, 2021 fj RFSpED ���_T¢ 71 /6 Cie Zoning Board of Appeals LIAR 17 ?021 Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building z0fliitl9 Board ior 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA Application 7467 & 7468SE Filed 12/21/2020 95 Navy Street, Orient NY SCTM # 1000-26-1-12.2 Dear Chair Leslie Kanes Weisman and Board Members: I am the resident owner of 205 Willow Street, a corner property at Vincent Street, opposite the subject site's Willow Street frontage (Taxlot 26-1-4). 1 am also the owner of 70 Vincent Street (Taxlot 26-1-5), approximtely 50 feet to the northeast of the subject site, as Vincent Street becomes Willow Street at the curve. I have been an active member of the Orient community for over 30 years. Unfortunately, I missed the March 4th hearing which is now adjourned to March 18, 2021. 1 await the upload of the missing elements of the application as listed in the "application checklist". With only the HPC initial and amended plans as guidance, I assume that little has changed based on the stated proposed lot coverage of 17.2%. Without plans, among other key documents, neither the Board nor I can fully respond in an effective and relevant manner. If document uploads are made subsequent to this submission, I will do my best to modify comments if applicable. Inter-Agency Relationships and Historical Perspective As actions relating to this subject property demonstrate, it is critical that all agencies recognize and support each other and Town law on behalf of the community. The Applicant's strategic approach to filing application(s) incrementally acts to narrow the scope for decision-making, but represents a distraction from fully appreciating the historical perspective of the Applicant's multitude of on-going efforts (with or without permits and approvals) to achieve the larger vision for the subject property with a level of benefits and "relief' that are excessive, don't constitute the minimum variance necessary, and are in total disregard to the special quality of the historic district within the Village of Orient. Ellen McNeilly 1 To support this claim, I direct the Zoning Board to my submissions to the HPC where the Applicant first presented his full vision (ie. including the Barn), then amended to exclude the Barn.' The HPC denial dated January 4, 2021 is specific to the amended plan's failings and lack of responsiveness by the Applicant; however, the denial does not speak to violations of the prior Certificate of Appropriateness dated June 18, 2014 that allowed for the relocation of the shed and barn buildings and made certain directives towards handling the mature trees on site. Specifically, the Applicant removed mature holly trees and continues to neglect and dismiss the viability of the large Willow tree (on Willow Street). This issue has been ignored by HPC and Building Department Code Enforcement despite numerous notifications and reports, including the verbal abuse from the Applicant towards me. Moreover, the on-going fagade/fenestration/framing work (without approval) on the Barn not only violates the HPC decision which expected "the structures [to be] restored and preserved as is", but also is inconsistent with the ZBA decision dated April 17, 2014 which relied of the Applicant's stated intent to "restore and preserve". 2 To date, the cottage appears untouched, as the Applicant plows ahead with extensive below grade infrastructure already completed along with the transformative work on the Barn (not reviewed by HPC). The permitted relocation of the shed and barn is complete, yet a final CO for this approved work has not been obtained, as outstanding issues are identified with each inspection. At a 2020 HPC hearing, the Applicant stated that there was no need for a Zoning Board application for the amended plan (house enlargement, shed enlargement/conversion, new pool). Clearly, it does. I strongly suggest that the Zoning Board, with its broader decision-making authority, as defined in Section 280-142 and 280-143, to "fully see the forest for the trees" of the Applicant's disingenous statements and unlawful actions, the history of the subject site, agency decisions, and the neighbor and community impacts of the proposed plan in its most complete form/vision. I To be brief for this ZBA submission, the attached HPC submissions (September 26, 2020 and October 20, 2020) do not include the supporting Appendices. Proposed Plan with Barn is located at TownOfSouthold > Historic Preservation Commission > Pending Files >2020 > HPC 08/18/2020 > Bertault. The Amended proposal subject to the HPC denial is located at TownOfSouthold > Historic Preservation Commission > Pending Files >2020 > HPC 09/29/2020 > Bertault—95 Naw Street amended proposal 2 See progress photos of barn reconstruction. Ellen McNeilly 2 ( r � L ZBA Application 7467: Setbacks, Front and Rear Yards The narrow scope of this area variance speaks to the enlargement of the single family cottage, the enlargement and conversion of the accessory shed to pool cabana, and the pool itself. Clearly, the HPC had issues with the proposed house enlargement overall and the location of the front door, in particular, which may impact the front yard determination at Navy Street. As regards the enlargement of the shed to a cabana, my HPC submission confirms that it is unnecessary and alters the shed building envelope to make it unrecognizable as a historic reference, keeping in mind that all structures on the subject property can be viewed from both Willow and Navy Streets, thereby impacting the community visual expectations of the Orient historic district. Perhaps the cabana use can be incorporated into the first floor of the barn, limiting the proposed residential unit to the second floor only. The placement of the pool may be the best position; however, mature evergreen screening is essential to protect and buffer neighbors from noise and the like. Due to the incompleteness of the application file, there is no verification of zoning/livable floor area by the Dept of Bldg, as the property card notes are unreadable. It is possible that the proposed enlargements and use conversions may exceed 20% lot coverage and should be verified as required. Regardless of the lot coverage of the proposed plan, the additional usage/occupancy at the subject site reflects environmental concerns already noted in the record. Since sanitary/drainage systems have been completed work in advance, the Board should confirm compliance with regulations. , ZBA Application 7468-SE: Accessory Barn to Accessory Apartment The provision to create accessory apartments is supported by the Town. How it gets applied to this particular Applicant's request requires thorough review, especially since it impacts the fagade, framing and fenestration of the structure which has already been altered (without permits) and is inconsistent with the Applicant's stated intent and ZBA and HPC expectations of"preserve and restore as is11.3 The Board should be cognizant of the fact that interior layout will no doubt impact the exterior treatment and would restrict the HPC review and goal to maintain historic references. Any illegal work at the Barn should not be accepted or considered "as built" seeking legalization. The livable area calculation for the Barn in order to satisfy the 750 square foot maximum is problematic. An annual inspection and renewal of the CO by the Building Department is required for this conversion. However, if it requires the Applicant to make the filing, I have little confidence of the Applicant's compliance. I am concerned that the livable area could easily be expanded, possibly creating two units, to achieve a maximum rental income from a non-family member. Without strict oversight and 3 See most recent photos of barn. Ellen McNeilly 3 verification, to think that the garage and workshop space will remain "not livable" is just foolhardy. The Applicant's claim he has no way to live, and that his mother-in-law or a future affordable housing tenant will be the occupant is disingenous given his determination to do what he wants, when he wants and the way he wants. First, the Applicant utilizes his Manhattan address, 320 East 18th Street, NYC on the building permits, a two-family townhouse owned by his mother-in-law, Ms. Fukuko Yahagi Harris and her husband, Mr. Brian J. Harris, according to public record. Since his purchase of the subject property along with the leasing of a commercial space on Village Lane (Opties & Dinghies) in Orient, he was able to find suitable rental accommodations locally. Recommendations Based on the history of the subject site, its current Certificate of Occupancy, the actions by the Zoning Board, Preservation Commission, SC Department of Health Services, Town Code Enforcement, and a review of the incomplete Zoning Board application dated December 21, 2020, 1 strongly urge the Zoning Board to: • Take nothing for granted and don't give the Applicant the benefit of the doubt. • Undertake rigorous review of the application; demand all necessary and pertinent documents. • Consider the self-created hardship; determine if this third variance is truly warranted. • Keep in context the full record with public comment, recognizing the fact of the HPC denial and the violations of the 2014 HPC decision that go unnoticed and without consequences. • Fully understand the plans for fencing, retaining walls, and tree removal, as concerns by neighbors that trees shared along the property lines will be immediately destroyed and/or die a slow death if roots are cut, increasing risk for fallen trees, property damage, health/safety hazard and significant expense without clearly assigned responsibility. • With any approvals, don't hesitate to use the Board's authority to apply strict conditions, deadlines, periodic proof of compliance and any other directive to protect neighbors and the community at large. Sincerelv, Ellen McNeilly Enclosures Ellen McNeilly 4 C� ZBA Application 7467 & 7468SE 95 Navy Street, Orient NY EXHIBITS McNeilly - HPC Letter Dated September 26, 2020 McNeilly - HPC Letter Dated October 20, 2020 Subject Site: Barn Photos & Tree Removal on Shared Property Line Ellen McNeilly 5 r Ellen McNeilly PO Box 314 Orient NY 11957 631-323-3989 ejmcneillyaearthlink.net September 26, 2020 /00- Historic Preservation Commission Edward Webb, Chairman Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Application Dated 7/15/2020 95 Navy Street, Orient NY SCTM # 1000-26-1-12.2 Dear Chairman Webb and Board Members: I am the resident owner of 205 Willow Street, a corner property at Vincent Street, opposite the subject site's Willow Street frontage (Taxlot 26-1-4). lam also the owner of 70 Vincent Street (Taxlot 26-1- 5), approximtely 50 feet to the northeast of the subject site, as Vincent Street becomes Willow Street at the curve. I have been an active member of the Orient community for over 30 years. Based on the history of the subject site, its current Certificate of Occupancy, the actions by the Zoning Board, Preservation Commission, SC Department of Health Services, Town Code Enforcement, and a review of the Proposed Plan (July 2020) under consideration', I-strongly urge the Historic Preservation Commission to undertake the Recommendations below: 1. Recognize and address the violations of Commission's June 2014 decision. Large, full grown Holly trees were removed, not relocated; mature, historic Willow tree neglected, not preserved. Declared "dead" by Applicant, contrary to Certified Arborist evaluation that is "thriving". Multiple attempts to remove the Willow tree, as recent as this month, cutting of branches required notification of Town Code Enforcement. Proposed plan excludes the required "relocation" of Holly trees and "preservation" of historic Williow, as if they never existed, nor subject to conditions of the Commission's approval. I See Appendix: • May 22, 2003 - ZBA#5218—Subdivision by prior owner to prep for 2005 sale to Applicant (Mr. Bertault)for$725,000 • November 18, 2004 - SC Department of Health Services— Environmental Review Letter • April 17, 2014 ZBA#6729— Relocate Existing Barn and Shed • June 18, 2014— Historic Preservation Commission Cert. of Appropriateness— Relocate Barn and Shed • Building Permits Issued: #39186-Z (9/15/2014); #41328-Z (1/30/2017); #44198-Z (9/23/2019) • Violation Notifications and Code Enforcement (2020 & Prior) Ellen McNeilly 1 V� 1 2. Narrow scope of review to only the proposed enlargement of the single-family house. The proposed change of use of the accessory barn to accessory apartment and accessory shed to pool cabana is not guaranteed an approval by the Zoning Board. The change of use informs all aspects of architectural function and design, as it seeks to satisfy occupant desires and building codes. Accessory Barn: It is self-evident that the modernist design to the accessory barn is inappropriate, negatively impacts the character of the historic district, and is unnecessary given the existing fenestration system. If the accessory barn is not converted to habitable space, the restoration the existing structure can be achieved. Accessory Shed: No detailed plans are provided that show the proposed conversion and enlargement of the shed to a pool cabana use. Detailed plans are required not only for architectural evaluation, but also for building code review, as the recently adopted Town code relating to pool houses is very specific as to size (max 350 sf), number of rooms (limited to a single bathroom —sink and toilet only), requirement that plumbing fixtures must drain to a Suffolk County Health Department-approved sanitary system in a conforming location, among other issues. Lastly, the proposed enlargement would alter the building envelope of existing 180 -+ square foot shed structure, making it unrecognizable as as a historic, accessory shed. Again, the change of use requires Zoning Board approval and is not guaranteed, and if denied, the restoration of the existing accessory shed structure can be achieved. Therefore, it is reasonable to suggest that the Commission should reserve judgment relating to the accessory barn and shed structures until after the Zoning Board of Appeals makes a determination as the proposed change of use dramatically impacts the treatment of fagade, fenestration, roofline, among other items. With the historical context in mind along with the added visual and verbal verifications by the Owner/Applicant, Mr. Bertault, the following outlines many serious concerns with the current proposed plan. Original Vision for Subject Site Misleading The incremental approach to seeking special permits has revealed that statements made in obtaining the 2014 approvals to relocate the accessory barn and shed structures misled the agencies and the public as to the Applicant's true vision which is now in full view as represented by the current proposed plan. For example- 1. The ZBA#6729 decision reflected the Zoning Board's understanding that: " The Applicant wishes to preserve and restore both accessory structures and to relocated them to eliminate the current need to drive cars over the existing septic system and to create more open space for gardening and recreation in the center of his property" Ellen McNeilly 2 J_ -1*616 2. In response to Patricia Moore's opposition letter dated March 13, 2014, the Applicant's representative and project architect Gary R. O'Conner, states: 'As per the testimony at the public hearing, Mr. Bertault shared his vision of restoring the barn to its original integrity and character." ... "As discussed during the hearing, the barn shall be used to house a vehicle and maritime equipment." It is clear that the 2014 special permit applications to relocate the accessory barn and shed was the first step towards a larger vision that generates significant impacts and is inconsistent with the Commission's mission and the purpose of the historic district. As such, the earlier statements made by the Applicant regarding the intent to preserve the "original integrity" and "character" were knowingly false and misleading. The proposed plan reflects the Applicant's pursuit of"owner enjoyment" and increased property value to offset the $725,000 purchase. The proposed plan is not a proposal to seek relief from a hardship inherent in the subject site. Upon purchase of the property, Mr. Bertault was fully aware of its limitations and constraints. Since the 2014 approvals, work to relocate the accessory structures has taken place; however, not always in accordance with the approval conditions. Violation and Enforcement The Commission's Certificate of Appropriateness issued on June 18, 2014 clearly stated that: "the applicant has agreed to make a good faith effort to preserve the property's existing trees and shrubs (particularly the holly trees) during the relocation process, and a letter ... by Michael Johnson of Johnson Tree Co., Orient, outlining how to protect the willow tree adjacent to the proposed location of the barn structure ... will be part of the applicant's final building permit application ... " Holly Trees No "good faith effort" was made to preseve and relocate two, large, mature Holly Trees due to the approved relocation of the accessory barn as shown on the December 12, 2012 property survey and the Proposed Building Relocation — Sheet AV dated 1/21/2020. They have been destroyed. When asked, the Applicant said that they were "too expensive" to relocate. In light of the improvements underway, the scope of the proposed plan, and the significant investment, using "cost" as a reason to violate the Commission's decision is not credible. The majestic size and height of the Holly trees (as tall as the barn) played an important role in blocking winds and protecting the historic Willow tree. Their destruction put the historic Willow in jeopardy. vA fE.7.�S ¢ .�u�'• ` 7 ti, '\ R d£l n r r' l 4,2Tf 'EMS 1.D#L i a=oo 0 te'tioLLr ieHOLL i fEaxw. Ellen McNeilly 3 1110* Historic Willow Tree As recent as this month, attempts to remove the Historic Willow tree, prompted notification and a site visit from both the Town Code Enforcement department and the Town Attorney's office. The current proposed plan Sheet A-4 dated 7/23/2020 removes the existing Willow tree and proposes a "new Willow tree", providing no details as to type or size, but rather, an unrealistic illustration of a very mature, healthy Willow tree canopy. WILLOW STFEET EL.a.7 W*283pE .—— 65.93' ELS Z _ 1 A, f 7 * 41 54 sr f` 44rr The Johnson letter as noted in the 2014 Commission's Certificate of Appropriateness is not readily available in order to evaluate if any steps were taken to protect the Willow tree. At my request, Mr. Jonathan Shipman of Shamrock Tree Company, a Board Certified Master Arborist on the North Fork, made a site inspection in September 2020 of the Willow Tree and concluded that: it is alive and continues to show new growth ... I do not feel the tree is hazardous ... With proper maintenance, a new crown can regrow allowing this historic tree to thrive." Even with damage due to the recent storm, the preservation of the Willow tree is possible. The recent cutting of branches to remove it entirely, and the assumption of its removal, as shown on the proposed plan is a violation and unacceptable. Environmental Quality Impact The Historic Preservation Commission application dated 7/15/2020 indicates that required additional approvals include the Zoning Board of Appeals; that is certainly true. However, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services is left blank. I am not well versed in Code Compliance as it relates to environmental review to know if the proposed plan requires additional approvals. However, based on the determination letter by the Suffolk county Department of Health Services dated November 8, 2004 in response to the ZBA# 5218 Lot Subdivision, it provided for two conditions: (a) ... recommended that the well on Lot 2 [subject site 95 Navy Street] be moved to a more optimum location"; and (b) "A covenant shall be provide ... and each lot is limited to a single-family residence only with accessory Ellen McNeilly 4 l uses as may be approved by the Town of Southold." The suggestion is that the subject site should be fruther burdened by the impacts of additional habitable building areas. The proposed plan seeks the enlargement of the single family residence, adding a bedroom and a half-bath, and the conversion of the accessory barn to habitable living area, including a kitchen, full bath and bedroom. The enlargement of the accessory shed and conversion to a pool/cabana may also include a bathroom and associated plumbing which requires Suffolk County Dept. Health approval, and then there is the pool itself and its water management and treatment (no details shown on proposed plans). Visual site inspection and recent inquiries by sanitary system professionals has verified that infrastructure work has already been completed. Is there a permit for this current work? Does it reflect the proposed plan yet to be approved or denied? Historic Integrity and Character Dismissed The architectural treatment to the existing buildings reflects a modernist approach not consistent with the preservation goals of the Commission, the Town and the community who are guided by the profile, use, and character of the original structures and its place within a historic district. M;� Single Family Residence Enlargement: The double height, voluminous space of the "summer dining" with its tower effect is a modern approach that pushes the enlargement to the extreme. �1 Accessory Barn to Accessory Apartment: The entire "adaptive re-use" of the all the architectual elements of the structure is thoroughly against all historic building and historic district goals and principles. Furthermore, the visual impact is significant and evident from all angles — adjacent neighbors, Willow Street and Navy Street frontage. p w R ilA P .t V--EW�NCERAv' 2 SCUT"EAST tiIEW 4WERiNG i 5.7.4tH t4ES" �Sd7TH hE51 . _..:- ..�--...._ Ellen McNeilly 1 Accessory Shed Enlargement to Pool/Cabana: Again, the change of use and t_ enlargement of the 180 -+ sf shed alters the building's envelope to be 1' ! ' _ unrecognizable as a shed and generates concerns regarding sanitary systems j; requires additional approvals. Comment is limited as no plan nor fagade details are provided for review. Proposed Plan: Change of Use Impacts All Architectural Elements Every element of the the proposed plan requires approval by the Zoning Board of Appeals, as it increases the scope of the existing non-comformance of the subject site and contains multiple variance requests represented by the use change; front and rear yard requirements, lot coverage, floor area increases in multiple structures. The determination by the Zoning Board will significantly impact the proposed architectural treatment of the barn and shed. The change of use inherently triggers both desires of the occupant and building code requirements for light and air among other issues that require changes in the fagade and fenestration treatment as well as the roof line (plumbing vent stacks) Therefore, the Historic Preservation Commission should reserve review and judgement on the accessory shed and barn structures, as it is not guaranteed that the change of use will be approved, as there is no justification for it. If change of use is denied, a full restoration of the accessory barn and shed structures can be a proposed plan that is deemed appropriate. Thank you very much for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, Ellen McNeilly Enclosure Appendix Ellen McNeilly 6 p,. U Ellen McNeilly PO Box 314 Orient NY 11957 631-323-3989 ejmcneillygearthlink.net June 14, 2021 RECEIVED Zoning Board of Appeals -7 Lf G 1� Town of Southold JUN 1 4 2021 Town Hall Annex Building S� 54375 Route 25 oning Boof ard Appeals Z P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971' Re: ZBA Application 7467 & 7468SE Filed 12/21/2020 95 Navy Street, Orient IVY SCTM # 1000-26-1-12.2 Supplemental Submission Dear Chair Weisman and Board 'Members: The following serves as a supplemental submission to the letter and materials dated March 15, 2021, and contains comments; questions and-concerns regarding the proposed plan dated 12-15-2020 representing the above mentioned applications before the Zoning Board. To date, the Applicant has not responded to Board and public comments by submitting an Amended Plan. Since the Board does not issue a "submission date" to the Applicant prior to the next Board meeting, both the Board and the public is subject to time contraints, thereby limiting effective review of new materials. If a last minute submission is made by the Applicant, I strongly suggest that the Board issue a postponement and keep the record open for further comment prior to its decision date. Public Record & Participation: Now and in the Future The public hearing on June 3, 2021 demonstrated the critical importance, particularly under the Covid19 requirements, of the Town's laserfische depository for public records that provide direct 24 hour access to all application materials that the public relies on (as is directed to in the public hearing legal notice) to provide the neighbors' perspective, a valuable contribution that should inform the Board's decision. An application's folder should also include a Public Comments subfolder, as it is done at the Planning Department. Lastly, as the post-Covid 19 period arrives, the laserfische should not revert back to being thought of as only a historical archive for final resolutions, but an on-going resource that broadens public participation in decisions that impact their daily lives. Ellen McNeilly 1 { 4' l ZBA Area Application #7467: Multiple Waivers — Incomplete File 40 The Application File The Area Variance Application #7467 represents the appeal to the Building Department's Notice of Disapproval dated October 22, 2020, a response to a permit application for "additions and alteration to an existing single family dwelling, construction of an in-ground swimming pool, construction of an accessory pool house/cabana and the installation of a fence". Application #7467 file shows the latest CO dated 2005 for a "seasonal residence with no heat", inconsistent with the Applicant's claim to living in the house for many years. The relocation of the accessory shed-and barn as per the 2014 HPC and ZBA decision appears complete. Advance work on sanitary and non-sanitary retaining walls and fencing is on going and presumes full approvals. Question: Before the ZBA grants any further approvals, shouldn't there be an updated CO to confirm that work related to the 2014 decisions has been performed properly and in accordance with the HPC and ZBA decisions, and codes that reflect the intent and expectation of accessory structures remaining as such. Obtaining an updated CO would be a challenge, as it would reveal (although Town's code enforcement is fully aware, but hasn't acted) the violation of the 2014 HPC decision regarding the following: WfltERE AS, the applicaant has agreed to make a good Faith effort to preserve the property's existing trL�and shrubs,-(particularly the h6lly irees)durif.g the relocation process, and NVI1,RE,AS, a letter was submitted to the Landmarks Preservation Commission on July 30, 20 M, by Michael Johnson, of 161hnson Tree Co.',Orient; 0tlining how to protect the willow tree adjacent to the proposed location of the barn st1-ucture. The letter will be part of the applicant's final building permit application and, it appears that the project requires no further review, -- Ellen McNeilly 2 �• moi. .j1 r'!;G,x to RV ±r. ''�—, �. Y,�" �'r. rte'�,' �!i✓ �'i° .o. �� ' c a �•5+i: �.. '+�� ''f� �ro �•� y' � ,fit - r•= 1Rfr�' 3 r 47W i '1 .4s. r_ y . h 1 .,ate Question: Is there an approved permit to undertake,the.fencing and retaining wall construction, and how does this work relate to the drainage and sanitary plan? The Applicant claims the Drainage Plan (12-14-2020) is approved, yet there is no stamped plan in the file. As regards the Sanitary Plan (12-14-2020), the Suffolk County Dept. Health Services (SCDHS) has issued a "rejection letter" dated June 2, 2021 that requires a water analysis, additional documentation and a ZBA approval. The SCDHS gives deference to the ZBA, as it recognizes its authority-and significant land use and environmental quality impacts inherent in ZBA decisions-to provide "relief' for a justifiable "hardship". Therefore, it is the obligation of the ZBA to require a complete, verifiable, accurate application file and to consider the increased density (enlarged house, conversion of two accessory buildings to residential and recreational use) of this proposed plan and the cummulative impact of prior variances on adjacent residents and the community at large. Evergreen Screening Beyond the New In-Ground Swimming Pool: I certainly support for the expected Board condition to provide evergreen screening'(assuming a' specified minimum height) to mitigate visual and noise impacts on neighbors. In addition, since the Applicant has no qualms in destroying historic, mature trees (on the subject property, along property lines to make way for retaining walls, and on neighboring properties)', I think it necessary for the ZBA to look beyond the swimming pool area and require new, equivalent plantings in response to the destruction that has already taken place.. Lot Coverage: Verification by the Board must be made as the current proposed plan does not include various hardscapes (defined by the Code's definition of building area) currently being constructed and expected to be installed at the subject site. The Plans lack details or a lot coverage diagram to quantify the true lot coverage. The areas are excluded from the lot coverage calculation-are: the swimming pool and "garden pool' surrounds, patios, above ground walls and the most controversal parking ramp associated with the Application #7468SE. The corrected lot coverage calculation is expected to exceed the 20% lot coverage requirement, triggering yet another variance waiver request. ZBA Application #7468-SE: Accessory Barn to Accessory Apartment The Orient community opposition and the 2014 HPC and ZBA approval #6729 to relocate two accessory structures based on the questionable "sanitary cover hardship" on the subject site`is in the record. The barn height and safety concerns was an issue then, and is even more of a concern now. Perhaps it wasn't fully appreciated since the approved plans dated 10/18/2013 did not properly show the 8'-6" elevation and the significant slope that is claimed to be supported by FEMA requirements.The full ' See Appendix for photos Ellen McNeilly 4 r consequence of the 2014 decisions is,now on display,andto great,disappointment by, the community. r FEMA,Requirements: Accessory_Structures vs.:Residential Buildings_,, As a witness to the Barn's two-stage foundation ---the first reflecting a lower supporting base appropriate,for-an-accessorty structure,-and the second phase that added-the height to-achieve the(&'-6"�seen;today r=-- I question whether,the "FEMA requirement" was a response to.an application for a;proposed accessory.apartment compared to the current permited use as an,accessory structure? Since the Applicant has done and continues to do work.iri advance, it.is important that the ZBA verify_that the,6'-6" foundation is aligned with FEMA rules for accessory structures. If it is found that the additional foundation-height reflects residential use,•,the,ZBA supported by:the Building Department should direct the Applicant to comply with the rules for accessory structures.. Paved-Paradise for Twd,Parking Spots. The proposed plan to provide two exterior parking spots on a asphalt, steep slope is unacceptable for multiple reasons` If approved, the ZBA would cause the Applicant'to•be in violation of'the'HPC 2014'' directive to preserve the'hisforic Willow Tree: At present, non-compliance"exists as it relates-to'-the former holly trees and other mature trees; now destroyed. An-alternative exists to provide parking at the-Navy Street frontage. Applicant states that the Drainage Plan has been approved by the Town. If that.is the case, then another Town Department will have caused the Applicant to be in non- compliance with the HPC 2014 decision. Furthermore,•direct_ly impacting•my'property-a't 205-WilloW Street,,the steep asphalt slope'will,-no doubt cause severe problems-as gushing water run-of ,heads to my front door and crawl space. WhoAs,responsible-for the anticipated"damage? As noted above, this SS ecial Exemption,application,does not comply.tg the standards triggering yet another waiver(s)from the code, without the benefit of-Building Department 'review and verification of tlieBarn's square.footage and the proposed livable area calculations as presen6 by the project architect. Alternative to Interior Configuration to Achieve Compliance Allowing livable space to span two levels Would be setting a dangerous precedent. The 930 square foot footprint of the Barn is sufficient to accommodate an accessory - apartment on the first floor. Given-the alternatives,to,providing all,parking spaces elsewhere,.the interior garage,and workshop,,space,-along with a'yoduced stairwell, can 2 See Appendix—Foundation and Barn Height Ellen McNeilly 5 certainly accommodate the plan's 302 square feet proposed,for the second floor. Assuming compliance with first floor living, the Board must specify that the second floor storage/attic area be accessed only by a pull-down attic ladder. Anything more,than a ladder will invite expansion of-livable area to the-second floor, especially since the Barn roof has been altered, anticipating livable second floor space. An annual inspection and.renewal of the CO by the Building,Department-is required for this conversion.- I have little confidence'that the either the Applicant or the Building Department will diligently comply. Moreover,,given a recent letter by the Applicant's attorney that is`very'inaccurate and acts to intimidate and threaten lawsuit, the community would,hestiate to make inquiries to confirm compliance. HPC Jurisdiction: ,New Window, Doors, Facade, and Fencing The Application 7468-SE materials do not include plans of the existing accessory barn structure to compare with the proposed conversion plan. In the HPC files, the existing Barn plans dated 7/23/2020 are available. Again,-itis important that any illegal work at the Barn should not be accepted or considered "as built" seeking legalization. When comparing the existing to the proposed, it is abundantly clear that,changes to the Barn requires review and approval by HPC. This is particularly evident at the Willow Street frontage., If meeting;minutes were available in the,HPC laserfische folder, there would be detailed discussions about window and_door design and specifications (including vendor sources), fagade.materials,,,paint color, etc etc. Again, the 20;14 HPC decision expects "preserve and restore as is" and-it would be unprecedented if HPC were to be by-passed and ZBA to exclude the condition for HPC approval. Recommendations Based on the history of the subject site, its current Certificate of Occupancy, the actions by the Zoning Board, Preservation,,Commission, SC,Department of Health Services; Town Code Enforcement, and a review of the Zoning Board application materials to date, it bears repeating that I strongly urge the Zoning,Board to:, •- Take nothing for granted and don't give.the Applicant the benefit of the doubt., • Undertake rigorous review of the application(s); demand all necessary and pertinent documents, particularly as it relates to the accessory Barn foundation height. • Consider the self-created hardship and the currimblative impacts associated with prior variances and the proposed plan; determine if this third variance and waivers from the Special Exemption requirements are truly warranted. • Seriously considerthe Alternatives to the-proposed plan, of Which there are many, to reduce negative impacts, and prevent dangerous, unnecessary precedents. Ellen McNeilly 6' • Keep in context the full record with public comment, recognizing the fact of the violations of-the 2014 HPG decision go unnoticed and without consequences and the potential for Town Departments to be in conflict. • Fully understand the plans for fencing, retaining walls, and tree removal, as neighbors and the entire Orient community has watched the destruction of mature trees shared along the property lines that are either gone forever or pose a health/safety hazard and significant expense without clearly assigned responsibility. With any approvals, don't hesitate to use the Board's authority to apply strict conditions, deadlines, periodic proof of compliance and any other directive to protect neighbors and the community at targe. Thank you very much for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, Ellen McNeilly Resident and Owner: , 205 Willow Street (Taxlot 26-1-4) 70 Vincent Street,(TaAot 26-1-5), Ellen McNeilly 7 APPENDIX Ellen McNeilly 8 b a 4 4 04 m+�.,„f •per . y l a" . �, .• '` �' .,of„ �. p ,E xt ir " « £ a y �'Y 4 Y �k..�� 1•-•'-�,i J !� ��.�. j it /t.~�- '".l - Height y Ellen McNeilly PO Box 314 Orient NY 11957 631-323-3989 eimcneilly(cDearthlink.net March 15, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold ��� Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 LZ P.O. Box 1179 f Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA Application 7467 & 7468SE Filed 12/21/2020 95 Navy Street, Orient NY SCTM # 1000-26-1-12.2 Dear Chair Leslie Kanes Weisman and Board Members: I am the resident owner of 205 Willow Street, a corner property at Vincent Street, opposite the subject site's Willow Street frontage (Taxlot 26-1-4). 1 am also the owner of 70 Vincent Street (Taxlot 26-1-5), approximtely 50 feet to the northeast of the subject site, as Vincent Street becomes Willow Street at the curve. I have been an active member of the Orient community for over 30 years. Unfortunately, I missed the March 4th hearing which is now adjourned to March 18, 2021. 1 await the upload of the missing elements of the application as listed in the "application checklist". With only the HPC initial and amended plans as guidance, I assume that little has changed based on the stated proposed lot coverage of 17.2%. Without plans, among other key documents, neither the Board nor I can fully respond in an effective and relevant manner. If document uploads are made subsequent to this submission, I will do my best to modify comments if applicable. Inter-Agency Relationships and Historical Perspective As actions relating to this subject property demonstrate, it is critical that all agencies recognize and support each other and Town law on behalf of the community. The Applicant's strategic approach to filing application(s) incrementally acts to narrow the scope for decision-making, but represents a distraction from fully appreciating the historical perspective of the Applicant's multitude of on-going efforts (with or without permits and approvals) to achieve the larger vision for the subject property with a level of benefits and "relief' that are excessive, don't constitute the minimum variance necessary, and are in total disregard to the special quality of the historic district within the Village of Orient. Ellen McNeilly 1 To support this claim, I direct the Zoning Board to my submissions to the HPC where the Applicant first presented his full vision (ie. including the Barn), then amended to exclude the Barn.' The HPC denial dated January 4, 2021 is specific to the amended plan's failings and lack of responsiveness by the Applicant; however, the denial does not speak to violations of the prior Certificate of Appropriateness dated June 18, 2014 that allowed for the relocation of the shed and barn buildings and made certain directives towards handling the mature trees on site. Specifically, the Applicant removed mature holly trees and continues to neglect and dismiss the viability of the large Willow tree (on Willow Street). This issue has been ignored by HPC and Building Department Code Enforcement despite numerous notifications and reports, including the verbal abuse from the Applicant towards me. Moreover, the on-going fagade/fenestration/framing work (without approval) on the Barn not only violates the HPC decision which expected "the structures (to be] restored and preserved as is", but also is inconsistent with the ZBA decision dated April 17, 2014 which relied of the Applicant's stated intent to "restore and preserve". 2 To date, the cottage appears untouched, as the Applicant plows ahead with extensive below grade infrastructure already completed along with the transformative work on the Barn (not reviewed by HPC). The permitted relocation of the shed and barn is complete, yet a final CO for this approved work has not been obtained, as outstanding issues are identified with each inspection. At a 2020 HPC hearing, the Applicant stated that there was no need for a Zoning Board application for the amended plan (house enlargement, shed enlargement/conversion, new pool). Clearly, it does. I strongly suggest that the Zoning Board, with its broader decision-making authority, as defined in Section 280-142 and 280-143, to "fully see the forest for the trees" of the Applicant's disingenous statements and unlawful actions, the history of the subject site, agency decisions, and the neighbor and community impacts of the proposed plan in its most complete form/vision. 1 To be brief for this ZBA submission, the attached HPC submissions (September 26, 2020 and October 20, 2020) do not include the supporting Appendices. Proposed Plan with Barn is located at TownOfSouthold > Historic Preservation Commission > Pending Files >2020 > HPC 08/18/2020 > Bertault. The Amended proposal subject to the HPC denial is located at TownOfSouthold > Historic Preservation Commission > Pending Files >2020 > HPC 09/29/2020 > Bertault—95 Navy Street amended proposal 2 See progress photos of barn reconstruction. Ellen McNeilly 2 ZBA Application 7467: Setbacks, Front and Rear Yards The narrow scope of this area variance speaks to the enlargement of the single family cottage, the enlargement and conversion of the accessory shed to pool cabana, and the pool itself. Clearly, the HPC had issues with the proposed house enlargement overall and the location of the front door, in particular, which may impact the front yard determination at Navy Street. As regards the enlargement of the shed to a cabana, my HPC submission confirms that it is unnecessary and alters the shed building envelope to make it unrecognizable as a historic reference, keeping in mind that all structures on the subject property can be viewed from both Willow and Navy Streets, thereby impacting the community visual expectations of the Orient historic district. Perhaps the cabana use can be incorporated into the first floor of the barn, limiting the proposed residential unit to the second floor only. The placement of the pool may be the best position; however, mature evergreen screening is essential to protect and buffer neighbors from noise and the like. Due to the incompleteness of the application file, there is no verification of zoning/livable floor area by the Dept of Bldg, as the property card notes are unreadable. It is possible that the proposed enlargements and use conversions may exceed 20% lot coverage and should be verified as required. Regardless of the lot coverage of the proposed plan, the additional usage/occupancy at the subject site reflects environmental concerns already noted in the record. Since sanitary/drainage systems have been completed work in advance, the Board should confirm compliance with regulations. ZBA Application 7468-SE: Accessory Barn to Accessory Apartment The provision to create accessory apartments is supported by the Town. How it gets applied to this particular Applicant's request requires thorough review, especially since it impacts the fagade, framing and fenestration of the structure which has already been altered (without permits) and is inconsistent with the Applicant's stated intent and ZBA and HPC expectations of"preserve and restore as is".3 The Board should be cognizant of the fact that interior layout will no doubt impact the exterior treatment and would restrict the HPC review and goal to maintain historic references. Any illegal work at the Barn should not be accepted or considered "as built" seeking legalization. The livable area calculation for the Barn in order to satisfy the 750 square foot maximum is problematic. An annual inspection and renewal of the CO by the Building Department is required for this conversion. However, if it requires the Applicant to make the filing, I have little confidence of the Applicant's compliance. I am concerned that the livable area could easily be expanded, possibly creating two units, to achieve a maximum rental income from a non-family member. Without strict oversight and 3 See most recent photos of barn. Ellen McNeilly 3 `^JJ ./AV verification, to think that the garage and workshop space will remain "not livable" is just foolhardy. The Applicant's claim he has no way to live, and that his mother-in-law or a future affordable housing tenant will be the occupant is disingenous given his determination to do what he wants, when he wants and the way he wants. First, the Applicant utilizes his Manhattan address, 320 East 18th Street, NYC on the building permits, a two-family townhouse owned by his mother-in-law, Ms. Fukuko Yahagi Harris and her husband, Mr. Brian J. Harris, according to public record. Since his purchase of the subject property along with the leasing of a commercial space on Village Lane (Opties & Dinghies) in Orient, he was able to find suitable rental accommodations locally. Recommendations Based on the history of the subject site, its current Certificate of Occupancy, the actions by the Zoning Board, Preservation Commission, SC Department of Health Services, Town Code Enforcement, and a review of the incomplete Zoning Board application dated December 21, 2020, 1 strongly urge the Zoning Board to: • Take nothing for granted and don't give the Applicant the benefit of the doubt. • Undertake rigorous review of the application; demand all necessary and pertinent documents. • Consider the self-created hardship; determine if this third variance is truly warranted. • Keep in context the full record with public comment, recognizing the fact of the HPC denial and the violations of the 2014 HPC decision that go unnoticed and without consequences. • Fully understand the plans for fencing, retaining walls, and tree removal, as concerns by neighbors that trees shared along the property lines will be immediately destroyed and/or die a slow death if roots are cut, increasing risk for fallen trees, property damage, health/safety hazard and significant expense without clearly assigned responsibility. • With any approvals, don't hesitate to use the Board's authority to apply strict conditions, deadlines, periodic proof of compliance and any other directive to protect neighbors and the community at large. Sincerely, Ellen McNeilly Enclosures Ellen McNeilly 4' /1 ZBA Application 7467 & 7468SE 95 Navy Street, Orient NY EXHIBITS McNeilly - HPC Letter Dated September 26, 2020 McNeilly - HPC Letter Dated October 20, 2020 Subject Site: Barn Photos & Tree Removal on Shared Property Line Ellen McNeilly 5 Ellen McNeilly PO Box 314 Orient NY 11957 631-323-3989 eimcneilly .earthlink.net September 26, 2020 '(/ Historic Preservation Commission Edward Webb, Chairman Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Application Dated 7/15/2020 95 Navy Street, Orient NY SCTM # 1000-26-1-12.2 Dear Chairman Webb and Board Members: I am the resident owner of 205 Willow Street, a corner property at Vincent Street, opposite the subject site's Willow Street frontage (Taxlot 26-1-4). lam also the owner of 70 Vincent Street (Taxlot 26-1- 5), approximtely 50 feet to the northeast of the subject site, as Vincent Street becomes Willow Street at the curve. I have been an active member of the Orient community for over 30 years. Based on the history of the subject site, its current Certificate of Occupancy, the actions by the Zoning Board, Preservation Commission, SC Department of Health Services, Town Code Enforcement, and a review of the Proposed Plan (July 2020) under consideration', I strongly urge the Historic Preservation Commission to undertake the Recommendations below: 1. Recognize and address the violations of Commission's June 2014 decision. Large, full grown Holly trees were removed, not relocated; mature, historic Willow tree neglected, not preserved. Declared "dead" by Applicant, contrary to Certified Arborist evaluation that is "thriving". Multiple attempts to remove the Willow tree, as recent as this month, cutting of branches required notification of Town Code Enforcement. Proposed plan excludes the required "relocation" of Holly trees and "preservation" of historic Williow, as if they never existed, nor subject to conditions of the Commission's approval. 1 See Appendix: • May 22, 2003 - ZBA#5218—Subdivision by prior owner to prep for 2005 sale to Applicant (Mr. Bertault)for$725,000 • November 18, 2004 - SC Department of Health Services— Environmental Review Letter • April 17, 2014 ZBA#6729—Relocate Existing Barn and Shed • June 18, 2014— Historic Preservation Commission Cert. of Appropriateness— Relocate Barn and Shed • Building Permits Issued: #39186-Z (9/15/2014); #41328-Z (1/30/2017); #44198-Z (9/23/2019) • Violation Notifications and Code Enforcement (2020 & Prior) Ellen McNeilly 1 2. Narrow scope of review to only the proposed enlargement of the single-family house. The proposed change of use of the accessory barn to accessory apartment and accessory shed to pool cabana is not guaranteed an approval by the Zoning Board. The change of use informs all aspects of architectural function and design, as it seeks to satisfy occupant desires and building codes. Accessory Barn: It is self-evident that the modernist design to the accessory barn is inappropriate, negatively impacts the character of the historic district, and is unnecessary given the existing fenestration system. If the accessory barn is not converted to habitable space, the restoration the existing structure can be achieved. Accessory Shed: No detailed plans are provided that show the proposed conversion and enlargement of the shed to a pool cabana use. Detailed plans are required not only for architectural evaluation, but also for building code review, as the recently adopted Town code relating to pool houses is very specific as to size (max 350 sf), number of rooms (limited to a single bathroom —sink and toilet only), requirement that plumbing fixtures must drain to a Suffolk County Health Department-approved sanitary system in a conforming location, among other issues. Lastly, the proposed enlargement would alter the building envelope of existing 180 -+ square foot shed structure, making it unrecognizable as as a historic, accessory shed. Again, the change of use requires Zoning Board approval and is not guaranteed, and if denied, the restoration of the existing accessory shed structure can be achieved. Therefore, it is reasonable to suggest that the Commission should reserve judgment relating to the accessory barn and shed structures until after the Zoning Board of Appeals makes a determination as the proposed change of use dramatically impacts the treatment of fagade, fenestration, roofline, among other items. With the historical context in mind along with the added visual and verbal verifications by the Owner/Applicant, Mr. Bertault, the following outlines many serious concerns with the current proposed plan. Original Vision for Subject Site Misleading The incremental approach to seeking special permits has revealed that statements made in obtaining the 2014 approvals to relocate the accessory barn and shed structures misled the agencies and the public as to the Applicant's true vision which is now in full view as represented by the current proposed plan. For example: 1. The ZBA#6729 decision reflected the Zoning Board's understanding that: "The Applicant wishes to preserve and restore both accessory structures and to relocated them to eliminate the current need to drive cars over the existing septic system and to create more open space for gardening and recreation in the center of his property" Ellen McNeilly 2 2. In response to Patricia Moore's opposition letter dated March 13, 2014, the Applicant's representative and project architect Gary R. O'Conner, states: "As per the testimony at the public hearing, Mr. Bertault shared his vision of restoring the barn to its original integrity and character." ... 'As discussed during the hearing, the barn shall be used to house a vehicle and maritime equipment." It is clear that the 2014 special permit applications to relocate the accessory barn and shed was the first step towards a larger vision that generates significant impacts and is inconsistent with the Commission's mission and the purpose of the historic district. As such, the earlier statements made by the Applicant regarding the intent to preserve the "original integrity" and "character" were knowingly false and misleading. The proposed plan reflects the Applicant's pursuit of"owner enjoyment" and increased property value to offset the $725,000 purchase. The proposed plan is not a proposal to seek relief from a hardship inherent in the subject site. Upon purchase of the property, Mr. Bertault was fully aware of its limitations and constraints. Since the 2014 approvals, work to relocate the accessory structures has taken place; however, not always in accordance with the approval conditions. Violation and Enforcement The Commission's Certificate of Appropriateness issued on June 18, 2014 clearly stated that: "the applicant has agreed to make a good faith effort to preserve the property's existing trees and shrubs (particularly the holly trees) during the relocation process, and a letter ... by Michael Johnson of Johnson Tree Co., Orient, outlining how to protect the willow tree adjacent to the proposed location of the barn structure ... will be part of the applicant's final building permit application ... " Holly Trees No "good faith effort" was made to preseve and relocate two, large, mature Holly Trees due to the approved relocation of the accessory barn as shown on the December 12, 2012 property survey and the Proposed Building Relocation —Sheet A1" dated 1/21/2020. They have been destroyed. When asked, the Applicant said that they were "too expensive" to relocate. In light of the improvements underway, the scope of the proposed plan, and the significant investment, using "cost" as a reason to violate the Commission's decision is not credible. The majestic size and height of the Holly trees (as tall as the barn) played an important role in blocking winds and protecting the historic Willow tree. Their destruction put the historic Willow in jeopardy. k . .•� 1 GnE�klIk�V(1-1 II +.2' t 4t• STREE M a ca m CKM \l ur Ii011Y f td 8011 FF-01W. Ellen McNeilly 3 Historic Willow Tree As recent as this month, attempts to remove the Historic Willow tree, prompted notification and a site visit from both the Town Code Enforcement department and the Town Attorney's office. The current proposed plan Sheet A-4 dated 7/23/2020 removes the existing Willow tree and proposes a "new Willow tree", providing no details as to type or size, but rather, an unrealistic illustration of a very mature, healthy Willow tree canopy. WILLOW STREET Na5-2830-E 65.93' n_....._ EL 5 Z �'---- i g JY�' i JEL r; �"'�`- _``__--->vim:_ •_��. & f Ask l The Johnson letter as noted in the 2014 Commission's Certificate of Appropriateness is not readily available in order to evaluate if any steps were taken to protect the Willow tree. At my request, Mr. Jonathan Shipman of Shamrock Tree Company, a ;. Board Certified Master Arborist on the North Fork, made a site inspection in September 2020 of the Willow Tree and concluded that: it is alive and continues to show new growth ... I do not feel the tree is hazardous ... With proper maintenance, a new crown can regrow allowing this historic tree to thrive." Even with damage due to the recent storm, the preservation of the Willow tree is possible. The recent cutting of branches to remove it entirely, and the assumption of its removal, as shown on the proposed plan is a violation and unacceptable. Environmental Quality Impact The Historic Preservation Commission application dated 7/15/2020 indicates that required additional approvals include the Zoning Board of Appeals; that is certainly true. However, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services is left blank. I am not well versed in Code Compliance as it relates to environmental review to know if the proposed plan requires additional approvals. However, based on the determination letter by the Suffolk county Department of Health Services dated November 8, 2004 in response to the ZBA# 5218 Lot Subdivision, it provided for two conditions: (a) ... recommended that the well on Lot 2 [subject site 95 Navy Street] be moved to a more optimum location"; and (b) "A covenant shall be provide ... and each lot is limited to a single-family residence only with accessory Ellen McNeilly 4 uses as may be approved by the Town of Southold." The suggestion is that the subject site should be fruther burdened by the impacts of additional habitable building areas. The proposed plan seeks the enlargement of the single family residence, adding a bedroom and a half-bath, and the conversion of the accessory barn to habitable living area, including a kitchen, full bath and bedroom. The enlargement of the accessory shed and conversion to a pool/cabana may also include a bathroom and associated plumbing which requires Suffolk County Dept. Health approval, and then there is the pool itself and its water management and treatment (no details shown on proposed plans). Visual site inspection and recent inquiries by sanitary system professionals has verified that infrastructure work has already been completed. Is there a permit for this current work? Does it reflect the proposed plan yet to be approved or denied? Historic Integrity and Character Dismissed The architectural treatment to the existing buildings reflects a modernist approach not consistent with the preservation goals of the Commission, the Town and the community who are guided by the profile, use, and character of the original structures and its place within a historic district. Single Family Residence Enlargement: The double height, voluminous space of the "summer dining" with its tower effect is a modern approach that pushes the enlargement to the extreme. Accessory Barn to Accessory Apartment: The entire "adaptive re-use" of the all the architectual elements of the structure is thoroughly against all historic building and historic district goals and principles. Furthermore, the visual impact is significant and evident from all angles — adjacent neighbors, Willow Street and Navy Street frontage. ... SOUTH NESTVEN RENDERING 1 S0-J`-En5'+1Eh REN'ER4G 3 NOR*MWES?'.1EN RENDERING:WLLOAf S'REE' Ellen McNeilly 5 ! I¢ Accessory Shed Enlargement to Pool/Cabana: Again, the change of use and enlargement of the 180 -+ sf shed alters the building's envelope to be f ! unrecognizable as a shed and generates concerns regarding sanitary systems ` L---Jrequires additional approvals. Comment is limited as no plan nor fagade details are provided for review. Proposed Plan: Change of Use Impacts All Architectural Elements Every element of the the proposed plan requires approval by the Zoning Board of Appeals, as it increases the scope of the existing non-comformance of the subject site and contains multiple variance requests represented by the use change; front and rear yard requirements, lot coverage, floor area increases in multiple structures. The determination by the Zoning Board will significantly impact the proposed architectural treatment of the barn and shed. The change of use inherently triggers both desires of the occupant and building code requirements for light and air among other issues that require changes in the fagade and fenestration treatment as well as the roof line (plumbing vent stacks) Therefore, the Historic Preservation Commission should reserve review and judgement on the accessory shed and barn structures, as it is not guaranteed that the change of use will be approved, as there is no justification for it. If change of use is denied, a full restoration of the accessory barn and shed structures can be a proposed plan that is deemed appropriate. Thank you very much for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, Ellen McNeilly Enclosure Appendix Ellen McNeilly 6 Ellen McNeilly PO Box 314 Orient NY 11957» °'63.1=323,-3989 eimcneilly@earthlink.net June 14, 2021 Zoning'Board of Appeals RECEIVED Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building = . UM1 4.2021, 54375 Route 25 A -ILA 6&�C(/ als P.O. Box 1179 70ning Board of ApPe Southold, NY 1101 ' ' = Re: . ZBA Application 7467 & 7468SE Filed'12/21/202'0 = 95 Navy Street; Orient NY SCTM # 1000-26-1-12.2 Suaplemental Submission = - Dear Chair Weisman and 8o6rd Members: The following serves as a supplemental submission to the letter and materials dated March 15' 2021' and contains comments;-questions-and"concerns regarding the proposed plan dated 12-15-2020"representing the above mentioned applications before the Zoning Board. To date, the Applicant has not responded to Board and public comments by submitting an Amended Plan: Since the Board does,not issue a "submission date" to the Applicant prior to the next Board meeting, both the Board and the public is subject to time contraints, thereby limiting effective review of new materials. If a last minute submission is made by the Applicant, I strongly suggest that the Board issue a postponement and keep the record open for further comment-prior to its decision date. Public Record &'Participation:, Now and in the Future ' The public hearing on June 3, 2021 demonstrated the critical importance, particularly under the Covid19 requirements, of the Town's laserfische depository for public records that provide direct 24 hour access to all application materials that the public relies on (as is directed to in the public hearing legal notice) to provide the neighbors' perspective, a valuable contribution that should inform the Board's decision. An application's folder should also include a Public Comments subfolder, as it is done at the Planning Department. Lastly, as the post-Covid19 period arrives, the laserfische should not revert back to being thought of as only a historical archive for final resolutions, but an on-going resource that broadens public participation in decisions that impact their daily lives. Ellen McNeilly 1 ZBA Area Application #7467: Multiple Waivers — Incomplete File The Application File The Area Variance Application #7467 represents the appeal to the Building Department's Notice of Disapproval dated October 22, 2020, a response to a permit application for "additions and alteration to an existing single family dwelling, construction of an in-ground swimming pool, construction of an accessory pool,house/cabana and the installation of a fence". Application #7467 file shows the latest CO dated 2005 for a "seasonal residence with no heat", inconsistent with the Applicant's claim to living in the house for many years. The relocation of the accessory shed and barn as per the 2014 HPC and ZBA decision appears complete. Advance work on sanitary and non-sanitary retaining walls and fencing is on going and presumes full approvals. Question: Before the ZBA grants any further approvals, shouldn't there be an updated CO to confirm that work related to the 2014 decisions has been performed properly and in accordance with the HPC and ZBA decisions, and codes that reflect the intent and expectation of accessory structures remaining as such. Obtaining an updated CO would be a challenge, as it would reveal (although Town's code enforcement is fully aware, but hasn't acted) the violation of the 2014 HPC decision regarding the following: ZVITEREAS, the applicant has agreed to make x good fail h ef'f'ort to preserve the property's existing tr,��and slirtibs;(particularly tho,holly trees)during,the relocation process, and NNrBE,REAS, a letter was submitted to the Landmarks Preservation Commission-on July 30, 2014, by Michael Johnson, of Johnson Tree Co.;Orient; ofatliriing how to pi6if be the willow tree adjacent to the proposal location of die barn straacture. The letter will be part of the applicant's £'anal building permit application and, it appears that the project requires no further review, Ellen McNeilly 2 t.L z.', :.� 'X, r.►� Ott+4.i ►.�,�� r 'c�iia� `� , �"�o y ,�+" ,� !i tir �� t�t VIN }. Willow • • • 2021 • ' THE RECORD THE HISTORIC WILLOWNOT • OR • Question: Is there an approved permit to undertake the fencing and retaining wall construction, and how does this work relate to the drainage and sanitary plan? The Applicant claims the Drainage Plan (12-14-2020) is approved, yet there is no stamped plan in the file. As regards the Sanitary Plan (12-14-2020), the Suffolk County Dept. Health Services (SCDHS) has issued a "rejection letter" dated June 2, 2021 that requires a water analysis, additional documentation and a ZBA approval. The SCDHS gives deference to the ZBA, as it recognizes its authority and significant land use and environmental quality impacts inherent in ZBA decisions to provide "relief' for a justifiable "hardship". Therefore, it is the obligation of the ZBA to require a complete, verifiable, accurate application file and to consider the increased density (enlarged house, conversion of two accessory buildings to residential and recreational use) of this proposed plan and the cummulative impact of prior variances on adjacent residents and the community at large. Evergreen Screening Beyond the New In-Ground Swimming Pool: I certainly support for the expected Board condition to provide evergreen screening (assuming a specified minimum height) to mitigate visual and noise impacts on neighbors. In addition, since the Applicant has no qualms in destroying historic, mature trees (on the subject property, along property lines to make way for retaining walls, and on neighboring properties)', I think it necessary for the ZBA to look beyond the swimming pool area and require new, equivalent plantings in response to the destruction that has already taken place. Lot Coverage: Verification by the Board must be made as the current proposed plan does not include various hardscapes (defined by the Code's definition of building area) currently being constructed and expected to be installed at the subject site. The Plans lack details or a lot coverage diagram to quantify the true lot coverage. The areas are excluded from the lot coverage calculation are: the swimming pool and "garden pool' surrounds, patios, above ground walls and the most controversal parking ramp associated with the Application #7468SE. The corrected lot coverage calculation is expected to exceed the 20% lot coverage requirement, triggering yet another variance waiver request. ZBA Application #7468-SE: Accessory Barn to Accessory Apartment The Orient community opposition and the 2014 HPC and ZBA approval #6729 to relocate two accessory structures based on the questionable "sanitary cover hardship" on the subject site is in the record. The barn height and safety concerns was an issue then, and is even more of a concern now. Perhaps it wasn't fully appreciated since the approved plans dated 10/18/2013 did not properly show the 8'-6" elevation and the significant slope that is claimed to be supported by FEMA requirements.The full ' See Appendix for photos Ellen McNeilly 4 consequence of the 201;4 decisions is,now on display and to great disappointment,by . the community. ; FEMA Requirements: Accessory!Structures vs. Residential Buildings As a witness to the Barn's two-stage foundation --- the first reflecting a lower supporting base appropriate for an accessorty structure, and the second phase that,added'the height,to achieve the 8 '-6" seen;today --- I question-whether the "FEMA requirement", was a'response to an application,for-a-proposed accessory apartment compared-,to' the current permited use as'aa accessory structure-2- Since the Applicant has done - and continues to do work in;advance, it is important that the ZBA-verify that the 8''- 6" foundation is aligned with FEMA rules for accessory structures. If it is found that the additional foundation height reflects'residential,use; the,ZBA.supported -by the ; Building Department should direct the Applicant to comply with the rules for accessory structures.. - =_ Paved Paradise`for Two Parking Spots! ✓ The proposed_plan to provide two exterior parking spots on a asphalt, steep slope is unacceptable for multiple reasons:'- If approved; the,�ZBArwould�cause-the Applicant to be'in violation of the HPC 2014" directive to preserve the historicWllow Tree. At present',-'non-compliance-exists as`it` relates to the former holly trees and,otherrma'ture,trees, -now destroyed.' An-alternative exists to provide parking at'the`Navy Street frontage. Applicant states that the Drainage Plan has been approved by the Town. If that is the case, then another Town Department will have caused the Applicant to,be'in non- compliance with the HPC 2014 decision. Furthermore, directly impacting my property at'205 Willow Street, the,steep`asphalt slope will no'doubt cause'severe problems as-gushino'water`run-off heads to'my front , door and crawl space. Who is responsible for the anticipated damage?" As noted above;this Special Exemption application does not comply to,the standards triggering.yet another Waivers) from the code, without the benefit of Building Department review and verification of the Barn' s square footage,and-the proposed livable area calculations as-presented-by ttieiproject architect.- Alternative to interior Configuration to-Achieve.Compllance_,, Allowing livable space to span two'levels,would be setting a dangerous precedent. The 930 square foot footprint of the Barn is sufficient to accommodate an accessory apartment on-the,first floor. Given,the alternatives to, providing all parking spaces elsewhere,.the interior garage,and workshop space, along-with a'reduced stairwell, can 2 See Appendix—Foundation and Barn Height Ellen McNeilly i.,. 5 S "7q� certainly accommodate,the plan's 302 square feet,proposed-for the'second floor. Assuming compliance with first floor living, the Board must specify that,the, second floor storage/attic area be accessed only by a pull-down attic ladder. Anything more than a ladder will invite expansion of livable'area to the second floor, especially since the Barn roof has been altered anticipating livable second floor space. An annual inspection and'.renewal of the CO by the Building Department is required for this conversion. I have little confidence that the either the Applicant or the Building Department will diligently comply. -Moreover, given•a recent letter by the Applicant's attorney that is very inaccurate and-acts to intimidate and threaten lawsuit, the community would hestiate to make inquiries to confirm compliance. HPC Jurisdiction: New Window, Doors, Facade, and Fencing The Application 7468-SE materials do not include plans of the existing accessory barn structure to compare with the proposed conversion plan. In the HPC files, the existing Barn plans dated 7/23/2020 are available. Again, it is important that any illegal work at the Barn should not be accepted or considered "as built"+seeking legalization. When comparing the existing to the proposed, it is abundantly,clear that changes to the Barn requires review and approval by HPC. This is particularly evident at the Willow Street frontage. If meeting minutes were available in the,HPC laserfische folder; there would be detailed discussions about window,and door design and specifications (including vendor sources), facade,materials, paint color, etc etc, Again, the 2014 HPC decision expects "preserve and restore as,is" and it would�be unprecedented if HPC were to be by-passed and ZBA to exclude the condition for HPC approval. Recommendations r Based on the history of the subject site, its current Certificate of Occupancy, the actions by the Zoning Board, Preservation Commission, SC-Department of Health Services, , Town Code Enforcement, and a review of the Zoning Board application materials to date, it bears repeating that I strongly urge the Zoning Board to: • , Take nothing for granted and don't give the-Applicant the benefit of;the doubt., • Undertake rigorous review of the application(s); demand all necessary and pertinent documents, particularly as it relates to,the accessory Barn foundation height. . , , • ;; , • Consider the self-created.hardship and the cummulative impacts associated with prior variances and the proposed plan; determine if this third variance and waivers from the Special Exemption requirementstare�truly warranted. • Seriously consider the Alternatives to the proposed plan, of which'there are many,,to reduce negative impacts, and'prevent dangerous, unnecessary- precedents. Ellen McNeilly 6 • Keep in context the full record with public comment, recognizing the fact of the violations of the 2014 HPC decision go unnoticed and without consequences and the potential for Town Departments to be in conflict. • Fully understand the plans for fencing, retaining walls, and tree removal, as neighbors and the entire Orient community has watched the destruction of mature trees shared along the property lines that are either gone forever or pose a health/safety hazard and significant expense without clearly assigned responsibility. • With any approvals, don't hesitate to use the Board's authority to apply strict conditions, deadlines, periodic proof of compliance and any other directive to protect neighbors and the community at large. Thank you very much for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, a Ellen McNeilly Resident and Owner: 205 Willow Street (Taxlot 26-1-4) 70 Vincent Street (Taxlot 26-1-5) Ellen McNeilly 7 APPENDIX } APPEN®IX Ellen McNeilly 8 r t _ v� •yep. x .7, T, Destruction of Historic Mature Trees '4 Ellen McNeilly `� y HeightStage 1 Foundation Stage 2 Foundation — Increasing Foundation , • Barn • Fuentes, Kim From: Patricia Cristo] <patricia.cristol@icloud.com> Sent: Saturday,June 12, 2021 10:16 AM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: 95 Navy Street Zoning Board of Appeals Jf'� q a Southold Town Hall ��J 10 1 Leslie Weisman, Chair �� Robert Lehnert,Jr. Eric Dantes Patricia Acampora Nicholas Planamento Kim Fuentes Re: 95 Navy Street Background: The barn on this property was moved 7 years ago away from the house and very close to Willow Street. It was then left to rot,while the residence itself became more and more dilapidated,with derelict vehicles on the side of the house and junk on the front porch. When there's rain, the piles of dirt run off into the street, which is now cracked. Work on the property has been sporadic over years. It has been a continuous eyesore. Currently: The barn has a giant trench around it,with even bigger piles of dirt everywhere,and seems to be extremely high off the ground. Now I understand that the owners plan to create an apartment in this barn.That's crazy. All the neighbors of this property have already been adversely impacted by this years-long mess, and the neighborhood environment will be further degraded by their plan.There's no room whatsoever for off-street parking on either Willow or Navy.The barn is way too close to Willow Street and out of scale.There's no room to screen or buffer the barn on the Willow Street side. The existing trees and shrubs, including the willow tree for which the street is named, have all been torn up. And now there's no space left to create a buffer. This property has been a mess since 2014. While the house and barn deteriorated,the site was repeatedly dug up and then left to spew dust and mud run-off.This has never been a good-faith effort by the owners.And, as a nearby neighbor, I've had enough.The house needs upkeep.The barn should sit on the ground. And remediation should take place in a timely and continuous way. Sincerely, Patricia Cristol 425 King Street Orient, NY 11957 patricia.cristol@icioud.com 917-821-7441 ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. i r r / Ellen McNeilly PO Box 314 Orient NY 11957 631-323-3989 eimcneilly(@,earthlink.net MEMORANDUM DATE: June 16, 2021 + TO: Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 ATTN: Chair Leslie Kanes Weisman and Board Members FROM: Ellen McNeilly, adjacent property owner at 205 Willow Street and 70 Vincent Street RE: ZBA Application 7467 & 7468SE Filed 12/21/2020 95 Navy Street, Orient NY SCTM # 1000-26-1-12.2 Since the filing of these applications in December 2020, much work has taken place at the subject site. The following site photos should bring the Board members up to date and provide clarification as to the amount of fill expected to arrive at the site to significantly change the topography, particularly at the northern part of the site where the Barn sits atop of a 8'-6" foundation and assumes a steep ramp to Willow Street and the destruction of the historic Willow tree that is to be saved, preserved and cared for as directed by the 2014 HPC decision. I encourage Board members to re-visit the site and get a feel for the unsettling impact of the current work and proposed plan that, if approved, neighbors will have to endure for years to come. 1 Ellen McNeilly—6.14.2021 y t RK 1 rr k \ �.�tR I Illi i .z A n ti Ilk Willow Street Frontage V Ellen McNeilly—6.14.2021 K iz yp7 r N ' t �` � �}S'^✓S s# �..`s.��^ � � �"g^'�v� 'S.ts��r ,ems � r.�L�� �a- >c��,,�r'w,�;. rW"'w r`�"SN`.,"&.,,€;*j,GG"�`s1. v zA}t"�i"«,r - � *,'"�' .° •,� . _.}..... 0 5t�.rfi i ..^.g�;`..�?"$�.l',t�... ?fS�'"' ,:G�ir��:A� '.•,.r'�G' J,sg��ri��'X..,ir".s.-.a CXS':,Sw,M. -.rn„r�.s.. Willow Street Frontage 3 Ellen McNeilly—6.14.2021 r' 4` x &P a of a41 ir RA sA R , r ,,. � ' a u��� Willow Street Frontage — West Property Line J \� 4 Ellen McNeilly—6.14.2021 PATRICIA C. MOORE P��- Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Tel:(631)7654330 Fax:(631)76511643 March 5, 2014 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re:Vincent Bertault#6729 Dear Chairperson Weisman and Board: represent William Gesell and his family, they are an adjacent property owner and would be adversely impacted by the relocation of the barn to Willow Street. They oppose this application. In my review of the application the following variances are required but have not been included in this application: (1) Setback variance from a "front yard"which requires a minimum of 35'when 20' is requested. (2)Accessory Building exceeds maximum size permitted of 660 sf. ft. and exceeds 18' in height. The barn is 850 sq.ft and the heigh is not provided. (3) The Flood Zone may affect the height of the existing structure. The Flood Zone is AE 6 which will require the finished flood elevation to be a minimum of 8'. It is not clear .what the owner intends to do with the relocated structure and at what height the foundation will be built. The property was previously owned by Mr. And Mrs. Woodhouse who obtained area variances to subdivide this and the adjacent parcel on Bay Avenue and Navy Street. Attached are the transcripts of the Zoning Board hearing, appeal #5218 of 2003. There was impassioned testimony at the hearing on the historic nature of the property and the existing structures. The subdivision supported the owner's desire to maintain the existing historic barn which was built between 1906 and 1920. l y N (q .meq yp 4 "jilt gw sh y � h e ii �.. •/�.� .moi r .v obk Y" vl The subdivision was supported by the neighbors because it preserved the integrity of the existing structures. The location of the structures is as important to the preservation of Orient Village as the structures themselves. Moreover, moving the barn could compromise the structural integrity of the existing structure, The applicant's reason to relocate the barn is not rational. It is much less expensive to place "traffic bearing" covers on the existing sanitary system then to relocate the barn. Finally, the notice of disapproval was revised to include approval of the Landmark Preservation Commission. This hearing should be postponed until the Landmark Preservation Commission reviews this application. This application needs a coordinated review. It is unlikely that the Landmark Preservation Commission will approve this application. Relocation of the barn should be denied. trul our s, LC. Moore encls. y ' ` Patricia C. Moore �? 9 Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 MAR 21 2014 Tel:(631)765-4330 Fax:(631)765-4643 J "ALS March 21, 2014 Ms. Leslie Weisman, Chair and Members of the Southold Town Zoning Board Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Appeal#6729/Vincent Bertault Dear Chair Weisman and Board Members: v y Please accept these written comments into the record in the above-referenced appeal. ✓1 Objections and Concerns: • Relocation of the barn is unnecessary. The frame barn in its existing location can serve as a garage using access to Navy Street. A pervious driveway and/or sanitary covers over the existing septic system make the requested variances unnecessary. The applicant's objective [refurbishment and use of existing barn] can be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. • Relocation of barn is detrimental to character of neighborhood and neighboring property. Enclosed please find Google Earth photographs of the subject property and surrounding area.' Vincent and Willow Streets are quiet,tree lined residential properties. The applicant's property abutting Willow Street is wooded. The relocation of the barn and placement of a driveway on Willow Street as proposed is unsafe. The Gesell's existing driveway is located on a curve. The proposed location of the barn and driveway would create conflicting access of the two driveways on the curved road. There is no reason to knowingly and intentionally create such an unsafe condition. • Nonconforming Structure cannot be altered without creating new non-conformity. The frame barn is already a non-conforming structure. It exceeds 660 square feet. The ' Exhibit 1 [aerial photos of Willow Street and Vincent Street] Exhibit 2 [Gesell house and driveway showing applicant's barn in present location 82 feet from Willow Street Patricia C. Moore Attorney at Law MAR 2 121114 March 21, 201410� APPEALS Re: Appeal# 6729 Bertault n v"` proposed relocation of the structure necessitates variances. Section 280-122(A)prohibits the alteration of a non-conforming structure if such alteration creates new or increased non-conformity. The application to relocate the non-conforming barn is prohibited by this section of the Town Code because the applicant seeks a front yard variance which constitutes a new non-conformity with the Code. • Accessory structure in front yard requires 35 foot setback. The proposed re-location of the barn at 20 feee in the front yard violates the 35 foot setback requirement for front yard structures. The applicant cannot use average setbacks of principal structures within 300 feet to justify location of the accessory structure. • Height of Relocated Barn violates height requirements. The applicant has suggested to relocate the barn with a 25 feet setback with an "adjusted barn height" of 18 ft. 9 inches above"finish grade to the ridge" As stated above,the setback requirement is 35 feet and the proposed height violates the zoning code height limitations. Building height is defined and measured from the "natural grade" [Southold Town Code §280-4] not,as proposed by the applicant above a"finished" grade. • Application fails to meet legal standards to justify variance. New York Town Law §276-b(3)(b)set forth the criteria the Board must consider before granting an area variance. The applicant has not satisfied these criteria. The applicant's stated rationale' for the variance is [1] restore the barn; [2] eliminate vehicular traffic adjacent to applicant's home/across the septic system and [3] simple pleasure of creating quality open space in the center of the property for the Owner's enjoyment. Respectfully,the stated rationale does not satisfy the legal criteria to justify issuance of the requested and necessary variances. The barn can be restored in its present location without variances. The applicant should not transfer his own vehicular traffic and the impacts associated with it upon the adjoining property owner. And owner enjoyment does not justify altering the character of 2 By letter dated March 13, 2014,the applicant's architect has amended the proposed setback to 25 feet which still violates the required 35 foot setback in the Code. ' Letter of Gary R. O'Connor, AIA dated March 13, 2014. Patricia C. Moore Attomey at Law March 21,2014 4� O Re: Appeal# 6729 Bertault the existing neighborhood, imposing the burden of a non-conforming structure in a non- conforming location on the property on the neighbor simply for the owner's "enjoyment." It is respectfully requested that the Board deny the requested variances. Sincerely; r atricia C. Moore PCM/mr cc: William Gesell AR 2 Z ?014 _S Ellen McNeilly PO Box 314 Orient NY 11957 �631-323-3989- eimcneilly apearthli6k.net June 28, 2021 C)CV Zoning Board of Appeals Town 'of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA Application 7467 & 7468SE Filed 12/21/2020 95 Navy Street, Orient NY - - - SCTM-# 1000-26-1-12.2 Supplemental Submission # 2 Dear Chair Weisman-and Board Members: y The following serves'as a supplemental'submission #2 to the letter and materials dated March 15, 2021,-June 16, 2021, and-June 21, 2021. All issues of concern detailed in these prior submissions remain current and provide a valuable contribution to the decision-making on the part of the ZBA for the above applications. - This submission speaks to the Applicant's "Revised Barn Plan" and Exhibits A, B, C. To be strongly considered by the ZBA are alternatives and protections identified below. Subject Site Status Subsequent to the ZBA's special meeting on June 17, 2021, the Applicant submitted a revised plan for the Barn's SE Application. Construction at the subject site continues, contrary to the ZBA's statement that the only valid permits reflect the 2014 HPC and ZBA decisions. It was noted that Town approval for the Drainage Plan' was only represented by an email, but no stamped plans were in the file. As regards the Sanitary Plan, the Suffulk County Dept. Health Services awaits the ZBA decision before issuing any approvals. To date, the Building Department states there are valid permits to allow construction. Given that the Drainage and Sanitary Plans are practically the same, we assume that the Applicant undertakes the workscope of both, regardless of SCDHS June 2, 2021 rejection letter and final ZBA approval. Advance work by the Applicant appears to be the approach that puts all agencies, including HPC, in a challenging position. 1 The Town'approval of the Drainage Plan conflicts with the HPC 2014 decision regarding the preservation of the historic Willow Tree,as the"asphalt driveway"requires tree destruction and additional HPC approvals as per the available LPC Handbook(Draft 2008)regulated activities. What components of the plan are approved? Ellen McNeilly 1 "Revised Plan and Exhibits A B C". ��lV Applicant's7 7 Exhibit A (2014 Drawing A-3), representing the 2014 approved relocation of the Barn "as-is" with the rear roof height at 17'-11" and the front (facing Willow Street) roof line at 18'- 9", including the note "6/11/2014 — Per Owner Request, Will Tree To Remain" was not adhered to. The Applicant chose to reconstruct the Barn roof and modify the building height to be a single roof line at 19' — 7" as shown in the intial submission Drawing A-3 dated 12-15-20. No revised elevation plan provided with last submission. Again, the Applicant's advance work, presumptions of full approvals (i.e variance to extend living space to second floor) results in an "as built" unapproved condition. The Applicant's lawyer is incorrect to say the SE Application is according to "Code". With the revised interior layout, does the ZBA simply accept the unecessary"as-built" condition (building height) granting yet another waiver, negating the HPC "as-is" directive creating a dangerous precedent and mixed messages for future applicants? And does the HPC lust defer, reliquishing their input? Exhibit B — Revised Drawing A-2 Interior Layout provides for the living area on a single floor; however, the grand staircase to the full height "storage area" at the second floor remains. If the ZBA seeks to uphold the intent and the necessary limitations of the Special Exception provision for accessory apartments, then there must be a specific condition that requires only a cull down ladder to the second floor. Given this Applicant's track record and the lack of confidence in the Building Dept. to take action, if the staircase remains as shown, the Applicant's dream becomes reality. Exhibit C — (Drawing A-1) Site Plan shows the revised parking spaces for two of the three vehicles and continues to show the destruction of the historic Willow tree. Proposed "replacement" is unacceptable and unachievable. ll S�rh Public comment and specifically concerns from 4. adjacent neighbors (in the past and now) about the negative impacts of an asphalt steep slope toward Willow Street solely to provide access to the Barn's `""" u,s,, - •, ' tie, "- a interior parking space, necessitating destroying the Willow Tree, was loud and clear. There are Alternatives to satisfy parking space requirements! Ellen McNeilly 2 Alternative 1 (PREFERRED): Relocate interior garage parking space to Navy Street at the southeast corner of the property. Driveway slope no longer necessary. Interior living space increased, if desired. The Barn frontage (21'-6") at Willow Street receives the new fill with landscape elements. Doors (Walk-Thru,Sliding and Large Swing) can remain functional or be made fixed in place. Willow Tree remains and acts to buffer, shield, the unhistoric Barn structure, now so out of place. Alternative 2: Interior parking space remains, ramp designed for safe single car entry, no full frontage asphalt driveway. Large, 8 foot wide Swing Door fixed in place and terraced or landscape feature installed in a way that preserves the Willow Tree. Again, interior living space increased if desired, as current layout is illogical. In sum, the preferred parking configuration is represented by street level exterior parking spaces at: (1) NW corner of property at Willow Street. (2) SE Corner at Navy Street, (3) SW corner at Navy Street. HPC Jurisdiction and Approvals Based on the LPC Handbook available on HPC website page and discussions and decisions made on numerious applications within the Village of Orient Historic District, it is abundantly clear that the Applicant cannot proceed with the exterior facade, door, fenestration treatment of the Barn nor the "front yard" driveway or parking areas as well as the Drainage and Sanitary Plan's "retaining walls exceeding 18" in height". Thank you very much for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, Ellen McNeilly Resident and Owner: 205 Willow Street (Taxlot 26-1-4) 70 Vincent Street (Taxlot 26-1-5) Ellen McNeilly 3 95 Navy Street, Orient NY V� ZBA Applications– 2021 Expected HPC Application 1 have reviewed Ellen McNeilly's letter dated June 28, 2021. I am in full support of the comments and critical concerns expressed in all of her submissions to both the ZBA and HPC in their respective application review and past approvals. The suggested limitation of the second floor access stair along with the Alternatives to satisfy the parking requirement and community concerns for health, safety, visual beauty and of course, prior approvals, is a must. Lastly, the on-going maintenance of the Laserfische files has shown to be of critical importance for Town transparency and Community input. Patricia .Cristol & Linda Rice Print Full Name: ig�nF u I Name L RIO— U Property Owner Ves No Local Add 42_&_KII Street / Box 15 Orient NY 11957 Additional Comments: T V 1 Ellen McNeilly PO Box 314 Orient NY 11957 631-323-3989 eimcneilly(aD-earthlink.net OCTOBER 4, 2021 ✓� jl/" Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold RECEIVED Town Hall Annex Building ' 54375 Route 25 OCT 0 5 2021 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Zoning Board of Appeals Re: ZBA Application 7467 & 7468SE Filed 12/21/2020 95 Navy Street, Orient NY SCTM # 1000-26-1-12.2 Supplemental Submission # 3 Dear Chair Weisman and Board Members: The following serves as a supplemental submission # 3 to the letter and materials dated March 15, 2021, June 16, 2021, June 21, 2021, and June 28, 2021, all of which provided a very detailed review and analysis with supporting documentation that highlighted key issues the ZBA must address. SUMMARY COMMENTS At Last ! The current Stop Work Order dated August 24, 2021 speaks volumes as to the Applicant's actions. It also represents "too little, too late" and "better late than never" inspection and enforcement responsibilities by the Building Department in identifying compliance issues associated with the 2014 HPC and ZBA decisions, and advance work without approvals or permits.' Clearly, the record shows the oversight and inaction of the Building Department (July & Sept 2017) to issue a Stop Work Order early on. Now, it is the ZBA and HPC that must make the determination --- a direct violation of the 2014 ZBA and HPC decisions to be corrected, or yet another illegal "as-built" condition that the Applicant expects to be legalized? ' SEE APPENDIX-Southold Town Code Enforcement and Building Dept Inspection records (website generated, direct emails to Town officials, site inspections)demonstrate the continuous notification of violations by the Applicant. Enclosed herein, one of the earliest occurs in 2015, represented by an email from Bill Gesell (adjacent owner)to Peter Doherty(Southold Town) Bldg Dept Chronology clearly shows their oversight and inaction- See July and Sept 2017 Ellen McNeilly 1 The HPC letter dated September 1, 2021 addressed to the ZBA fails to mention the Applicant's agreements and then non-compliance with the 2014 HPC decision (see sections below) as it relates to the existing trees on the subject property, particularly the historic Willow tree. Attempts to destroy the Willow tree directly or by neglect as well as the wholesale removal of mature trees from the property is well documented, but is consistently overlooked. WHEREAS, the applicant has agreed to make a good faith effort to preserve the property's existing trees and shrubs(particularly the holly trees)during the relocation process,and WHEREAS, a letter was submitted to the Landmarks Preservation Commission on July 30, 2014,by Michael Johnson,of Johnson Tree Co., Orient,outlining how to protect , the willow tree adjacent to the proposed location of the barn structure.The Ietter will be part of the applicant's final building permit application and,it appears that the project requires no further review, Consequences for Non-Compliance: With the loss of confidence with the Building Department Enforcement, the ZBA and HPC has a responsibility to recognize the Applicant's non-compliance of prior decisions, especially when the Applicant comes back for more and is submitting multiple special permit applications over time for the same subject property. Moreover, the ZBA and HPC should use their authority by assigning enforceable conditions that ensure future compliance. The ZBA and HPC are not the direct enforcement agencies; however, the decisions with specific conditions "give teeth" to the enforcement efforts. "Ask for Forgiveness, Not permission" "Legalizing the Illegal" : An unacceptable approach for any Applicant and should not be tolerated by any agency. RECOMMENDATIONS TOWARDS RESOLUTION ZBA Application # 7467 2 Based on the C of A from the HPC (4.5.2021) and the deliberations at the prior ZBA hearing, it would appear that an approval is expected for#7467. 2 ZBA Application 7467—Plans Digital filename: "95 Navy St ZBA Area Variance with Approved HPC Updates" A-1 Site Plan dated 12.15.2020 A-2, A-3, A-4—VOIDED A-5 dated 12.15.2020 Photos A-6 dated Revised 3.11.2021 Proposed Plans A-7 dated Revised 3.11.2021 Exterior Elevations Ellen McNeilly 2 Plans: 1. No plans should be stamped "final approved" unless they are made accurate and align with the approved proposed plan. A-1 Site Plan dated 12.15.2020 is inaccurate. It shows a 4' picket fence where a cement wall now stands and shows the destruction of the historic Willow tree, a violation of the 2014 HPC decision. The proposed "replacement" is unacceptable and unachievable given the maturity of the Willow tree, nearby drainage and sanitary components and its current location providing a visual buffer to what has become a "unhistoric" barn on a raised platform. 2. Applicable to both Applications are the Drainage and Sanitary Plans3, both of which show unacceptable and unapproved elements such as the asphalt driveway which assumes a two-car situation and the destruction of the historic Willow tree. Conditions to Apply: • Specify that ZBA and HPC approved plans take precedent over any inconsistent elements found in the Drainage, Sanitary, or other supporting plans relevant to the proposed development. Alternatively, require all related developments plans to align with approved plans and conditions. • Beyond the standard "evergreen screening" to buffer the noise and visuals of the proposed pool, an enhanced detailed planting plan with enforceable deadlines should be required for the entire property and specific preservation efforts required to preseve the historic Willow tree. ZBA Application 7468SE 4 Plans: 1. No plans should be stamped "final approved" unless they are made accurate and align with the approved proposed plan,. 3 Applicable to both Applications are: Drainage Plan dated 12.14.2020 Sanitary Plan—P-1 dated Revised 4.2.2021 SCHS Comments Sanitary Plan—P-2 dated 12.14.2020 4 ZBA Application 7468SE Plans: "Revised Barn Plan" as per Bressler letter dated June 11, 2021 Exhibit A—A-3 dated 6.11 2014 Existing [Non-Complying Roof Line] Exhibit B—A-2 Revised dated 6.10.2021 Proposed Plan Exhibit C—A-1 Revised dated 6.10.2021 Site Plan Ellen McNeilly 3 As noted above, the Site Plan drawing shows the destruction of the historic Willow Tree and a proposed replacement and other inaccurate elements. The Site Plan shown as Exhibit C —A-1 Revised dated 6.10.2021 Site Plan is unacceptable and requires revision. 2. Verification of flood permits, FEMA regulations must be made to determine the foundation height associated with the 2014 "as-is" relocation of the accessory Barn.5 Modified Barn Roof Line and Height, 1. Exhibit A (Drawing A-3 dated 6.11.2014), representing the 2014 approved relocation of the Barn "as-is" with the rear roof height at 17'-11" and the front (facing Willow Street) roof line at 18'- 9", including the note "6/11/2014 — Per Owner Request, Will Tree To Remain" was not adhered to. The Applicant chose to reconstruct the Barn roof and modify the building height to be a single roof line at 19' — 7" as shown in the intial submission Drawing A-3 dated 12-15-20. 2. The ZBA has the authority and should require that the Barn roof be returned to its "as-is" condition. Legalizing the illegal in this case signals the wrong message to future applicants. However, if the ZBA and the HPC consider this as an "as-built" condition to be legalized, then it must be balanced with a condition to restrict access to the second floor, ensuring that the "storage" area is not used as living area. Otherwise, where is the recognition and consequence for the Applicant's illegal action? 5 What needs to be taken into account here, and noted to the ZBA, is that the barn was initially moved to its current position AT GROUND LEVEL, and not set on a foundation, as it had been at its previous location in the center of the lot. It remained, roofless and foundation-less at the current location for some years until recently put on its initial concrete foundation at ground level,when sanitation and grading work commenced. See original plan, dated 10/18/13. Shortly thereafter,the foundation was raised an additional 4'. When asked by a neighbor why it had been raised, the response from the Applicant was that"FEMA made us do it". No permit for that action was posted, nor seems to have been granted. It was only in retrospect realized by concerned neighbors that this was done in anticipation of permission for an accessory apartment to be incorporated in the structure. Ellen McNeilly 4 Second Floor "Storage Area" 1. Exhibit B — Revised Drawing A-2 Interior Layout provides for the living area on a single floor; however, the grand staircase to the full height "storage area" at the second floor remains. The ZBA should uphold the intent and the necessary limitations of the Special Exception provision for accessory apartments. Therefore, a specific condition that requires only a pull down ladder to the second floor should be applied. Parking Spaces 1. Exhibit C — (Drawing A-1) Site Plan shows the revised parking spaces for two of the three vehicles and continues to show the destruction of the historic Willow tree. As noted, the ,proposed "replacement' is unacceptable and unachievable. 2. Proposed Interior Parking Space triggers the need for an access ramp into the structure. This leads to the destruction of the historic Willow Tree, a hard surface ramp that exasberbates the water runoff towards my property at 205 Willow Street and traffic safety is reduced as vehicles back out onto the narrow and curved portion of Willow Street. To mitigate these negative impacts, there is an alternative. Necessary Design Changes and/or Conditions to Apply: The determination regarding the illegal modification of the roof line and the resulting increased height of the second floor must be paired with an interior design change to restrict access to the second floor "storage" area to prevent further illegal actions by the Applicant. Restrict Access to 2nd floor "storage" area by requiring a pull-down ladder, instead of the proposed grand staircase which would allow for easy access and enjoyment of the large, full height (if ZBA and HPC legalizes "as-built' illegal modified roof line and height) second floor. The proposed plan labels it "storage", but the temptation and the actual use will be living area for each two year period, not including the one day assigned to Town inspection. Ellen McNeilly 5 Parking Space Alternative: Relocate interior garage parking space to Navy Street at the southeast corner of the property. Driveway slope no longer necessary. Interior living space increased, if desired. The Barn frontage (21'-6") at Willow Street receives new fill material with terraced landscape elements. Doors (Walk-Thru,Sliding and Large Swing) can remain functional or be made fixed in place. Willow Tree remains and acts to visual buffer, shield, the un-historic Barn structure, now so out of place. In sum, the preferred parking configuration is represented by street level exterior parking spaces at: (1) NW corner of property at Willow Street. (2) SE Corner at Navy Street, (3) SW corner at Navy Street. Thank you very much for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, Ellen McNeilly Resident and Owner: 205 Willow Street (Taxlot 26-1-4) 70 Vincent Street (Taxlot 26-1-5) Enclosures Ellen McNeilly 6 APPENDIX CODE ENFORCEMENT - EARLY NOTIFICATION 2015 EMAIL BILL GESELL (ADJACENT OWNER) TO PETER DOHERTY (SOUTHOLD TOWN) CHRONOLOGY OF BUILDING PERMIT & INSPECTION OVERSIGHT & INACTION Ellen McNeilly 7 From: billgesell1agmail.com Subject: BERTAULT #6729 Date: April 2, 2015 at 1:03:38 PM EDT To: <PeterD town.southold.ny.us> Peter, I have been in contact with Damon and he suggested I contact you with my concerns. I own the property located at 20 Vincent St., Orient. My property adjoins the Bertault property located at 95 Navy St. Yesterday my neighbor informed me that a tree service company was in the process of removing two holly trees.The holly trees and the willow tree, for which Willow street is named, were topics of discussion at several Zoning Board and Landmark Preservation meetings last year. Mr Bertault stated that he would preserve the willow tree and relocate the holly trees. The drawings used to get the building permit reflect this. Yesterday, my neighbor asked the tree service representative, who was in the process of removing the holly trees, why he was removing the trees. My neighbor was informed that Mr Bertault was provided with a quote for relocating the holly trees and Mr Bertault decided that this was to expensive and the trees should be removed. My concern is what will Mr Bertault do next. Doesn't he have an obligation to follow the plans the town approved? To be open with you I opposed Mr Bertaults request for a variance and relocation of barn for the following reasons. 1. 1 felt that relocating barn would change the historic character of Orient. The barn has been in its current location since late 1800. Over 50 Orient residents agreed with me and they signed a statement to this effect which I submitted to the Landmark Preservation Committee. Bottom line is that the Landmark Commission approved relocation so this issue is closed. 2. My property is a corner lot with limited access to street. Relocating barn and providing access to Mr Bertault's property from Willow St. will restrict vehicular access to my property. If Mr Bertault parks a car at the end of his driveway I will not have vehicular access my proper. Mr Bertault said he would not do this but only time will tell. 3. The latest drawing I obtained show that the relocated barn height will exceed code and will not comply with required side yard set back.The Zoning Board of Appeals did not address these issues. The ZBA only addressed the relocated barn setback from Willow St., which was the reason the Building Department originally rejected permit. I might point out that the plans approved by the ZBA are not the same plans used by the Landmark Preservation Commission. The major difference is the floor elevation of the relocated barn was raised from 7 to 8 ft. See Ellen McNeilly' 8 attached for details. I had an architect review plans and she agreed with my concision that the maximum code height will be exceeded if foundation is raised to 8 ft. I request that you review plans and reach your own conclusions regarding height and side yard set back issues mentioned in 3 above. Please let me know what you conclude and what can be done to insure compliance with all applicable codes. I also do not understand why the Town feels a decision is valid when the information used by each group involved in the decision process is different. Thanks for your attention to this matter. Bill Gesell 732-616-9005 Specifically: Drawing, Drawings Approved by ZBA Presented to Historic Preservation Commission 1.Drawing A.l a.Revised 01/21/14 a.Revised 6/11/14 Dated 10/18/13 b.Relocated barn F.FLR b.Relocated barn F.FLR EL.=7.0' EL.=8.0' c.Min.side yard setback to c.Same west:15' I Min.side yard setback to d.Same east:Not shown.Measures approximately 18' e.Average natural elevation e.Same for relocated barn:4.6' (per Drawing A.l) 2.Drawing A.3 a.Revised 1/21114 a.Revised 6/11/14 Dated 10/18/13 b.Height of front roof b.Same above ground floor: 187" e.Height of foundation from c.Height of foundation from "raised"ground to fust floor. "raised"ground to first floor: Not shown 158" 3.Max.Barn height in relocated position 21.15' 22.15' (see attachment 1) Ellen McNeilly 9 r 1 Attachment 1 v Ref:#6729—Bertault Residence Accessory Building Relocation Calculation of Maximum Building Height for Relocated Barn A.Maximum barn height(from natural grade)on Drawing presented to Historic Landmark Commission [=18.75'(1)+8.0(4)'-4.6(2)']* 22.15' B.Maximum barn height on Drawings approved by ZBA [=18.75'(1)+7.0'(3)-4.6'(2)]* 21.15' *Numbers in brackets are shown below Information used to calculate maximum building height 1.Maximum Barn height from ground floor to front roof as shown on Drawing A.3 dated 10/18/13 (Revision 1/21/14 and 6/11/14) 18.75'(18'9") 2.Height of"natural grade"for footprint of Relocated barn as shown on Drawing A.1 dated 10/18/13 (Revision 1/21/14 and 6/11/14) 4.6' 3.Ground floor elevation shown on A.1 revised 1/21/14 7.0' 4.Ground floor elevation shown on A.1 revised 6/11/14 8.0' Note: Code specifies "Height of Accessory Buildings"is measured from the"natural grade adjacent to the building,before any alteration or fill....:. Ellen McNeilly 10 FOIL REQUEST FILES — OCTOBER 8, 2020 Name Date modified Type Size `t 95 Navy St 11/15/2020 10:44 AM Adobe Acrobat D... 1 KB 39186-Z-Bertault 2014 plans-Barn Foundation 11/15/2020 1 O-A3 AM Adobe Acrobat D... 2,312 KB `�L 20201008141452-Attorney Ltr-Oct 2020 FOIL 10/8/2020 4:08 PM Adobe Acrobat D... 47 KB 20201112090021-Stop Work-TEmp shed 11/15/2020 2:55 PM Adobe Acrobat D... 2,207 KB 20201112090106-Complaint Running Water 11/15/2020 10:43 AM Adobe Acrobat D... 269 KB 20201112090141-Complaint French Drains 11/15/20201043 AM Adobe Acrobat D.. 446 KB ">t 20201112090208-Investigation May 2016 11/15/2020 9:58 AM Adobe Acrobat D... 193 KB 20201112090235-Jan 2015 Unsafe Barn Structure 11/15/2020 10:26 AM Adobe Acrobat D.. 1,468 KB ` 20201112090309-Investigation Oct 2016 11/15/2020 16:27 AM Adobe Acrobat D... 1,386 KB 20201112091923-Bldg Permits 11/15/202010:28 AM Adobe Acrobat D... 2,978 KB Bertault-95 Navy St 11/15/2020 10:29 AM Adobe Acrobat D... 16,364 KB Bertault __- v - _ , _ -� 11115/202010.26 AM �Adobe Acrobat D..v 1 KB Z-3755 11/15/2020 10.44 AM Adobe Acrobat D... 176 KB Z-30982 11/15/202010:26 AM Adobe Acrobat D... 699 KB Z-30983 11/15/202010:26 AM Adobe Acrobat D... 314 KB Z-31196 11/15/2020 10:45 AM Adobe Acrobat D... 283 KB ` ZBA Variance 5218 11/15/2020 10:45 AM Adobe Acrobat D.. 8,975 KB Chronology of Events — As Per File Contents in Filename "2020111209123-Bldg Permits" 10/24/2013 Application for Building Permit, relocate Accessory Barn & shed. no change of use planned 9/15/2014 Permit#39186 granted (to expire 3/16/2016) 3/31/2015 Floodplain Development Permit Application filed X: relocationk Structure type: residential (1-4 Family X: other: relocation of accessory frame barn and shed 4/2/2015 Gessell letter: drawing shows barn height will exceed code >Plans ok'd by ZBA (rev 1/21/14) hgt: 21.15' >LPC ok'd by HPC (rev 6/11/14) 22.15' Ellen McNeilly 11 Plans show different elevation from natural grade 10/26/2015 Inspection: Elevation & Location Survey required before any framing approved by Bldg Dept. 11/16/2015 Project Architect Letter to DRallis: "Barn slab on grade lowered 18 inches, top of foundation wall elevation not needed, as flood vents to be installed" Note:Applicant decides not to do vents, how does this impact FEMA and other requirements in relation to height requirement??. Rallis ok's foundation location (no comment on grade issues) 10/4/2016 Permit 39186 expires 1/30/2017 Permit 41328 to relocate barn and shed, which have already been moved. 7/11/2017 Inspector states "Contact Bldg. Dept., West elevation roof framing is incorrect (see photos)" 9/5/2017 Bldg Insp.: "Framing and Strapping OK" Note: Has not been redone on West elevation 9/20/2019 Bertault pays fees for renewal of expired Bldg permit. 9/23/2019 Permit #44198 issued: Relocate existing barn building and shed as applied for per LPC Certificate of Appropriateness and ZBA approval ---with flood permit. Note: Does not address differences between ZBA and LPC/HPC plan information Ellen McNeilly 12 10/15/2020 Building Relocation (which building not ID'd on Plan), Questions from Bldg Inspector: "What is new overall height? Amend drawings for elevation and overall height. What is finished grade?" 10/22/2020 Architect letter re: foundation detail—work to resume, protective barricade to protect construction area to be installed 10/22/2020 Proposed temporary barricade (at street verge?) Note: Reference to modified floor elevation @8' Note: Reference to existing "Willow tree trunk'; which LPC>HPC indicated was to be saved, Ok condition confirmed by Master Arborist Jonathan Shipman in letter to Supervisor Russell, et. al. 10/30/2020 Building inspection Architect to certify pinning of new foundation to existing foundation and Finished floor elevation Storm water Management Plan is required if., (grade is to be raised)??????? Amend drawings for elevations and Overall heights. Last permit expired on 3/24/21 Ellen McNeilly 13 Gary R. O'Connor—Architect 8 Coryell Street Lambertville,New Jersey 085 ,609-397-36 March 12, 2021 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals MP aC of P��e 53095 Main Road o d P.O. Box 1179 �o-oq Southold,New York 11971-0959 Re: Appeal No. 7467 and Appeal No. 7468SE qjoProperty owned by Vincent Bertault("Applicant") 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 Ladies and Gentlemen: I am the architect for the Applicant and submit this letter in support of the applications and in response to points raised by the Board at the March 4, 2021 hearing. First,the area immediately behind the house has drainage issues by reason of invasion of water from the property to the east. A copy of a photograph illustrating same is attached. Thus, movement of the house to this location is problematic at best. Second, although the nominal distance to the front property line is small, the actual distance to the paved street is approximately 14 feet as shown in the annexed photograph of the front of the property. Finally,this Board has consistently recognized the non-conforming nature of many of the structures in the historic district in Orient and determined that often there is no feasible alternative to requesting relief from the code. See e.g.,matter of Asch ZBA#6738 where the Board determined that, as to Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(2), "The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The dwelling exists in its non-conforming front yard setback locations, therefore any proposed additions such as the first floor screened front porch will require front yard setback variances."This is exactly the Applicant's situation. As a result, movement of the entire house should not be considered a feasible alternative. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, d Gary R. O'Connor, AIA Architect cc: Mr. Vincent Bertault, Property Owner Mr. Eric Bressler, Esq. ,yam' � d� "`"` � ate. �. ,;•. . ._ ,,,.E -<;_��, s' .� k wb x n s a F 4 f t a a , y x av yv, v Google f cet F..c..::P 3` = �c. t i=f3. E.l c _4 t"ted la°es fat$;' s� w o. ,ate 1 � a 7 � , w u e • :N.. '`� ' .. v d� r p ^ %, i. _ » _ , '! ✓.Y` � day_ w REEIVED C _�41� &s-6 MAR 2 2 2021 LAW OFFICES Zoning Board Of Appeals WICKHAM,BRESSLER& GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD,P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565 ebressler@wbglawyers.cbm March 19, 2021 Via Electronic Mail Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Re: Appeal No. 7467 and Appeal No. 7468SE Property owned by Vincent Bertault("Applicant") 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 Ladies and Gentlemen: We are the attorneys for the Applicant and write concerning the Board's determination on March 18, 2021 to adjourn these matters, sine die. We ask that the matters be placed back on the calendar at the earliest possible date. The four reasons for the request are set forth below in detail. First, an area variance is separate and distinct from a certificate of appropriateness and relief from front yard setbacks by this Board is governed by entirely different factors. A certificate of appropriateness is, of course, a condition for the issuance of a building permit. Thus, this Board need not address the issue before the Historic Preservation Commission, ("HPC"). Assuming, arguendo,the Board opts to address the HPC issues, the Board can and should grant the variance subject to receipt of a certificate of appropriateness, as it has on other cases. See, e.g., Matter of Asch,ZBA#6738, condition Ali"The variance relief for the setback from Oyster Ponds Lane is permitted only if the proposed porch addition is approved by the Southold Town Landmark Preservation Commission". As a factual matter,the proposed front porch is not the subject of objection by HPC as it is not the basis for the Denial. Indeed,the Denial does not even mention the porch. Second, the variance application for the swimming pool is not related to any required application before HPC or any other board and there is no other reason why it should not be determined. a 00 Third, our application to HPC with respect,to the fagade of the barn was made at the time of application for the house,but could not be;pursued. HPC advised that the applicant should obtain a special exception from the ZBA before it would consider an application for a certificate of appropriateness. Thus,the applicant is caught between two boards, each refusing-to grant relief without prior action'by the other. We believe that the ZBA is the appropriate board to grant relief in the first instance for two reasons. First,the request for a special exception does not involve approval of the exterior of the structure. It is an application related to use, not appearance. Second, it is unreasonable to require an HPC application to approve an exterior related to an apartment use when such use has not been approved by your Board. Finally, as a procedural matter,the determination to table sine die was not appropriate. The public hearing on March 4, 2021was originally proposed by the Board to be closed subject to receipt of requested documentation. However, at the Applicant's request the hearing was held open both to present additional material and for the opportunity to comment on same or any other submissions received by the Board and address any questions of the,Board. The agenda for the meeting listed as a proposed action a resolution to close the hearing, clearly indicating that the hearing was still open. Thus,the hearing on this matter has not been closed and the Applicant should have been afforded an opportunity to address the Board in connection with the previously undiscussed proposed tabling sine die of the matter. Specifically,the procedure employed by the Board at the Special Meeting deprived the Applicant of such an opportunity to hi's detriment. By reason of the foregoing, we ask that the matter be returned to the.ZBA calendar for the next available date. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Very trulurs, Eric J. f r EJB/cs Miry Ends cc— Vincent Bertault 2011rng Boar6 G,f John Burke, Esq. ���ls } 1 Gary R. O'Connor—Archlted 8 Coryell Street Lambertville,New Jersey 08530,609-397-3635 March 22,2021 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals RECMED 53095 Main Road --1 q.6-1 t"7q�, $5 P.O. Box 1179 MAR 2 2 2021 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Re: Appeal No.7467 and Appeal No.7468SE Zoning Board Of Appeals, Property owned by Vincent Bertault("Applicant") 95 Navy Street,Orient,New York SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 Ladies and Gentlemen: I am the architect for the Applicant and submit this letter in support of the applications and in response to the body of work presented by neighbor Ellen McNally. I think the overarching message here is that Ms. McNally,as she states in her first paragraph has been an active member of the Orient Community for over 30 years. I would rephrase this to be Over Active when it comes to her obsession with Mr.Bertault and his property. Ms. McNally apparently wants to control how another individual uses their own property directing where she feels elements of the program should reside and govern how one chooses to improve their property. As evidence of obsession is the how one combs thru every possible record and detail, photographing every move Mr. Bertault makes on his property not to mention a handful of times this individual has called on the Building Department to investigate and stop work for the Department of Buildings to come out and find no wrongdoing. Ms. McNally is making false accusations that testimony given to the Board in 2014 was disingenuous and part of a larger plot to mislead the Board. Our statements regarding barn use were true in the time and place where Vincent was with the property, but time and circumstance change, both individually and environmentally, causing plans to evolve and change which Ms. Ellen has no understanding or concern about,yet she has a conspiracy theory about a larger nefarious plot to ruin her community. If anything,Mr. Bertault has taken the time since getting the Bard relocation approval to figure out his needs over a period of time and then expressed this plan for his property and is now seeking the appropriate approvals withing the prescribed code and approval process which unfortunately leaves the application open to every voice and opinion trying to direct a Board how they should respond. Hopefully, the Board sees the obsessiveness of this individual and takes this false and misleading narrative with a grain of salt. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Gary R. O'Connor,AIA Architect cc: Mr.Vincent Bertault,Property Owner Mr. Eric Bressler,Esq. 06 so RECEIVE® 16+6SS MAR 31'2021 Zoning Board Of Appeals LAW OFFICES WICKHAM,BRESSLER& GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD,P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565 ebressler@wbglawyers.com March 30, 2021 Ms. Elizabeth Sakarellos Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Re: Appeal No. 7467 and Appeal No. 7468SE Property owned by Vincent Bertault("Applicant") 95 Navy Street,-Orient,New York SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 Dear Ms. Sakarellos: Thank you for your e-mail of 3/24/2021 requesting writings from the HPC in connection with the Bertault applications. We write to advise that any correspondence, writings, or documentation received from HPC concerning Bertault have been previously provided to the ZBA, with the exception of the transcripts of meetings which have not yet been made available. We further advise that a conference was held on March 10,2021 to discuss the bases for the HPC objections and possible resolution of the issues. At the conference none of the issues related to the subject matter before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Specifically, HPC has no objection to the proposed wraparound porch and the pool and accessory apartment are not before HPC. Very trul yours, Eric J. Bressler EJB/cs Encls cc— Vincent Bertault. LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER& GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD,P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565 ebressler@wbglawyers.com June 3, 2021 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals RECEIVED 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 [,:REC:EIVED Galt Re: Variance Appeal No. 7467 Property owned by Vincent Bertault 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 Ladies and Gentlemen: We write regarding the above referenced variance application. In connection therewith, and specifically the porch application, we enclose 9 copies of photographs demonstrating numerous houses with porches in very close proximity to the street line (including wrap- around porches such as is sought by the Applicant) currently existing in the hamlet of Orient. These photographs show many of the houses, and a business property, with porches right off the front yard line encountered as one enters Orient hamlet on Village Lane, and proceeds South to Navy Street(one home is on Fletcher Street). These photographs demonstrate that the Applicant's proposed wrap-around porch would be entirely consistent with the character of the neighborhood, as set forth in the variance application. Thank you for your consideration of this material. Very truly yours, Eric . r EJB/cs Encl. cc— Vincent Bertault I Bertault #7467 h 47IN- v T � d IG t m �r 4 fr 4 7 - e- IR s ; N s w% t.SF a- 'S 1 LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER& GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD,P.Q.BOX 1424 WILLIAMVICKHAM(06-02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 RECEIVED TELEFAX NO.631-298-85654 gsc ebressler@wbglawyers-com 6 JUN 1 1 2021 June 11, 2021 20ning Board of Appeals Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Re: Variance Appeal No. 7467 and Special Exception No. 7468SE Property owned by Applicant Vincent Bertault 95 Navy Street, Orient, New York S'CTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 Ladies and Gentlemen: We are the attorneys for the Applicant and write in furtherance of the public hearing held on June 3, 2021 on these applications, ("Hearing"). We address, infra,the relevant public comments made at the Hearing. We further address, infra, the public comments at the Hearing which were not relevant to the applications to clarify the record without conceding the relevance of such comments. Finally,we address the concerns of the Zoning Board of Appeals,,("ZBA")with respect to: (a)the requested two-floor layout of the proposed accessory apartment, and(b)the location of parking. A. THE RELEVANT PUBLIC COMMENTS AS TO THE HOUSE VARIANCE REQUEST There were no comments or objections at the Hearing concerning the request for relief relating to the proposed wrap-around porch. The proposed porch is consistent with others in the area and would be situated further from the property line, a moving the entire dwelling is not feasible, as more particularly as set forth in the materials previously submitted,including,but not limited to, the report by Joseph Fischetti, Professional Engineer.Moreover,the house in its current location maximizes the quality of space and utilization`between the structures on the property,which was achieved as a result of the movement of the barn, as approved by the ZBA in#6729 and by HPC. RE(.tiv Cv JUN 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals B. VARIANCE REQUEST ✓ '`� l There was only one comment(and no objection) at,the Hearing concerning the request for relief relating to the proposed swimming pool. One neighbor expressed a desire for screening of the proposed pool. The Applicant reiterates that screening will be provided,as is customary. The Applicant values his privacy as least as much as any adjoining property owner, especially given the nature of the Hearing. As the lot is a"thru"lot, the relief requested is customary. C. THE RELEVANT PUBLIC COMMENTS AS TO THE BARN SPECIAL EXCEPTION There were several comments addressing the location of the required parking spaces for the proposed accessory apartment. As set forth in Section F, infra,the Applicant has determined to relocate, in part,the parking to address the concerns of the ZBA. There were no other relevant comments, as the application now meets the requirements of the Southold Town Code, ("Code"). D. THE RELEVANT PUBLIC COMMENTS AS TO THE VARIANCE REQUESTS RELATING TO THE PROPOSED ACCESSORY APARTMENT There were no public comments as to the variance requirements for a two-story accessory apartment. The concerns of the ZBA in this regard are addressed in Section F, infra. E. THE IRRELEVANT PUBLIC COMMENTS The irrelevant public comments fall into five categories,to wit: storm water management,HPC approval, sanitary system, landscaping, and barn use. Each category is addressed, infra. 1) Storm Water Management: All storm water management work is being conducted in accordance with a plan approved by the Southold Town Engineer. The plan meets the requirements of the Code. A copy of the plan has been submitted to the ZBA. 2) HPC Approval: HPC issued a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed dwelling fagade. HPC issued a Certificate of Appropriateness and the ZBA granted approval for the movement of the barn in 2014,which has been moved in accordance therewith.HPC approval relates only to the facade,not to the interior of the structure or the use of the structure.The HPC approval reflects the actual height of the barn in the new location (to meet FEMA guidelines) and the access to the garage by means of an incline. A copy of Sheet A-3 which was approved by the HPC is attached as Exhibit A. LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER& GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD,T.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565 ebressler@wbglawyers.com JUS I d\I 2 0 2021 June 28, 2021 Via Electronic Mail Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals e 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 UU Southold,New York 11971-0959 t Re: Appeal No. 7467 and Appeal No. 7468SE Property owned by Vincent Bertault("Applicant") 95 Navy Street, (Orient, New Fork SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 Ladies and Gentlemen: We are the attorneys for the Applicant and write concerning the Zoning Board of Appeals' ("Board")determination on June 17,2021 to adjourn these matters, sine die. We ask that the matters be placed back on the calendar at the earliest possible date. The reasons for the request are set forth below in detail. First, an adjournment sine die,without the consent of the Applicant, is,ultra vires, is arbitrary and capricious, contrary to law, and constitutionally infirm.New York Town Law §267-a requires that the Board fix a suitable time for a public hearing. An adjournment sine die fails this requirement, Second,the variance application for the porch and swimming pool were not the subject of any objection at the public hearing and are ripe for determination. There is no reason to defer a determination. Third,the variance application in connection with the special exception is now moot. Thus, there is no longer any connection between Appeal No. 7467 and Appeal No. 7468SE. Assuming, arguendo, the Board needs more information as to Appeal No. 7468SE, (which it does not), there is no reason why Appeal No. 7467 should not proceed. Fourth, the stated reason for the adjournment sine die,to wit: the request of the Historic Preservation Commission, ("HPC") is without legal basis. The HPC has no standing before the Board as its jurisdiction is limited by Southold Town Code Chapter 190. There is nothing more for HPC to detennine as it has granted certificates of appropriateness for the proposed house and the barn. The Board deals with area variances, use variances, and special exceptions, not facades. HPC deals with facades. There is no overlap and-the Board need not and should not adjourn the matter at the behest of HPC. Finally,the Applicant has endured lengthy and unreasonable delays before HPC only to be faced with an unsupportable denial which necessitated an appeal to the Town Board. The Applicant has now been through multiple public hearings sessions lasting many hours, and, for the second time, has been faced with an unsupportable adjournment sine die. The Applicant has endured hours of irrelevant and ad hominem attacks.No-objection was raised to the request relief concerning the porch nor the swimming pool. The sole impediment to a special exception for an accessory apartment has been removed. He is now entitled to prompt resolution of his application in accordance with applicable law. We trust that you agree. By reason of the foregoing, we ask that the matters be returned to the ZBA calendar for the next available date, the public hearing being deemed closed and a determination made. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Very trrul yours, Eric I ressler SIB/cs Encls cc— Vincent Bertault Bill Daffy, Esq. LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSL'ER& GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD,P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) MATTITU,CK,LONG ISLAND ERIC 1.BRI:SSLER NEW YORK 1,1952 ABIGAILA&WI,CKHAM JANET GEASA 631=298=8353 TELEFAX N-O.-631-29,8=8565 q � ebressler@wbglawyers.com OCA, F� .October 6,2021 Southold Town Zoo Appeals nin .Board p' 53,0.95 Main Road P.O.Box 11.79 Southold,New York 11971-095:9 Re: Variance Appeal No. 7467 and Special,Exception No.'7468SR Property owned by Applicant Vincent Bertault 95 Navy Street,-Orient;New York SCTM## 1000-26=1.122 Ladies and,Oentlemeri; We are tNe-attorneys for the,Applicant and write in response to the multitude of letters received by the Zoning:Board of Appeals, ("ZBA"), immediately prior to and since the last.public hearing.As has been the case with the prior public hearings and the prior correspondence,the latest communications are almost entirely irrelevant to the issues before the ZBA,but,rather,ad hominem attacks on the Applicant,Nonetheless,we address,infra, six of the common areas of complainticomment. A. Length of the Process The length of.the process has been dictated by the Historic Preservation Commission anti,the ZBA. Between these two agencies, aggravated by the continuing neighbor complaints and-intervention,approximately IS months have elapsed without"the Applicant being able to effectively move forward. This far exceeds typical time frames. B. The Condition of the Applicant's Property The present,condition of the Applicant's property is a result of the failure to promptly process applications and actual interferences in Applicant's approved work. If the variance with respect to the porch is granted, work on what some have described as a run-down cottage can proceed. Work on the storm water management plan and sanitary system can be completed once the ZBA makes a determination.At that time the work can be completed and,piles of'dirt backfilled, and the area finally re-graded in accordance with the approved plan. The longer the process takes,the longer before work can be completed, '140 C. Parking The ZBA has received an amended parking plan which meets the concerns ofthe.ZBA. The ramp to the barn was previously approved in 2014 by all relevant agencies, D. The Porch Variance The mly comment with respect to the variance request concerning the poreh,'Is that,in the opinion of the commenter,"it serves no purpose". This is not an acceptable basis for denial. in fact,.:the porch serves the important purpose of'providing outdoor seating farther from Navy Street, shade from afternoon sun, and access to the garden and is,compatible with the Orient hamlet atmosphere. E. Configuration of the AccessoKy Apartment The issue before the ZBA is;the use of a portion of the first door of the barn for-an accessory apartment. Thus,the la y=oft of the proposed-apartment is'irrelevant, as,is the :means of access to the second floor. These are matters-for`fhe Building Department,not the.ZBA. F. The Pool The only comment with•respect,to the variance request concerning the swiYnming pool is that it should be screened to the west frorh View. The Applicant bas already agreed.to ,provide screening, G. Conclusion 'These applications'have been subject to mach obstruction, delay, interference, and irrelevant objections. These reasons are not valid reasons to delay either,variance application.There is-now no need for a variance in connection with the special exception as all of the conditions far a special exception have been met. There is no,reason to deny same. As the ZBA is well aware, there are numerous accessory apartments throughout Southold Town, and, indeed, in,Orient. That-the Applicant sought to legally obtain such an improvement is something to be respected rather than attacked.Ve.urge the ZBA to approve the applications. We thank the ZBA for its attention to these applications. VeJ. !ressler ours, Eric EJB/cs cc— Vincent Bertault - t our Uniq%y Edward Webb,Chairperson Anne Surchin,Vice Chair Town Hall Annex � SOr � Robert Harper ' UTHOLD 54375 Route 25 unUTH • Joseph McCarthy = ;rrj z PO Box 1179 Mariella Ostroski N� rauIna f* o Southold NY 11971 � ��D ��� � Fax(631)765-9502 Tracey Dwyer,Administrative Assistant A I Telephone:(631),765-1802 RFs�RVA-noN www.southoldtownny gov Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commissi n December 17,2020 RECE�/E® 7 �7�-- 1 d 1-91r b RESOLUTION #10.22.20.2 MAR 112029 Certificate of Appropriateness Zoning hoard OfApAeals RE: 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY SCTM# 1000-26.-1-12.2 - - -- - - - - -- Owner: Vincent Bertault RESOLUTION: WHEREAS, 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY is on the Town of Southold Registry of Historic Landmarks, and building lies within the designated'Orient Historic District according to the National Register of Historic Places and the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 170-8 of the Town Code(Landmarks Preservation Code) of the Town of Southold, all proposals for material change/alteration must be reviewed and granted a Certificate of Appropriateness by the Southold Town Historic Preservation Commission prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, and, WHEREAS, the applicants representative Gary R. O'Connor submitted a proposal to' construct a rear addition to the structure, replace the windows, doors siding and roof on the entire structure, the reconfiguration of the front entry, conversion of an existing shed to a cabana and installation of a covered porch, and, WHEREAS, a pre submission hearing was held on August 18, 2020, where the applicants representative submitted drawings of the scope of work and outlined the project for the commission, and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on October 22,2020, where the applicants representative submitted the final proposal of the project for the commission, and, WHEREAS, the property is currently in use as single family home and under the proposed plan that single family use remains. Therefore, the analysis of whether the proposed alteration is consistent with principles of adaptive reuse, whereby the principal historic features of the landmark are maintained while permitting the use of the landmark for new uses other than its original use is not applicable to this proposal. WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission considered similarity in design, architecture and appearance of the proposed alteration with the historic design, architecture and appearance of both the original structure REM® Q and those in the surrounding historic district and determines as follows: The proposed alteration will significantly change the appearance of the Navy MAR 11208 Street facade since the front door and steps leading to the porch will be - centered under the large dormer, The proposed 1-story addition facing to the IiEiBi1 __ rear of the_Structure,.composed of a summer/dining-room (15'-8" long x 14' deep) rising 19' in height from the first floor elevation to the ridge, is in fact equivalent to a two-story house. Also proposed is a rectangular cupola adding another Y-11" to the overall height of the structure. Part of the wing facing Willow Street also,includes a new bedroom, 20' long stepped back 12" from the summer/dining room, running parallel to Navy Street. 2. The addition is not subservient to the principal building. While its ridge is 15" lower than the original house-the new cupola of the addition is actually higher than the house ridge. The massing of the rear dwarfs the scale of neighboring houses. The three wings together don't relate to one another or the neighbors and the inchoate and conflicted forms of the proposed alteration and addition just aren't compatible with the general historic character of the National Register Historic District. WHEREAS, the proposed construction is not necessary for compliance with the applicable building codes or other federal or state regulations, and, WHEREAS, the proposed construction is not necessary to allow for a use of the property permitted by the Town Code in the applicable zoning district; WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to preserve the historic features of the landmark and its relation to the historic character of the community and Town as the subject property although altered over the years to be relevant for its time, still represents a fine example of the rural regional vernacular style typical m of Orient cottages in the 19th century. This cottage, with it existing front REMdoor offset from an axial stepped entrance, includes two dormers, one small and one large, puncturing the roofline but extending strai ht u in the s� g p ame plane as the front wall, and along with an amalgam of small additions at the AppeaSrear constitute the major features of this structure, all of which are visible Ln from Navy Street, and, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the Southold Town Historic Preservation 'Commission determines that the proposed work detailed in the above referenced application fails to meet the criteria for approval under Section 170-8 (A)of the Southold Town-Code and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the Commission denies the request for a Certificate'of Appropriateness. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, Pursuant- to §170-7(C)(3) the Historic Preservation Commission makes the following recommendations: 1. The linear link between the structures on Navy and Willow streets shows first floor fenestration east elevation composed of three casement windows sitting under--a dormer, which-is -the same width as _tlie-window-ensemble below.- This elongated dormer with three awning windows awkwardly mimics the roof pitch of the side gable of the house on the east side of the cottage. If it had punctured the wall plane like the dormers on the front of the house or been designed as a shed dormer, the result would be more historically accurate. -2. If the scale of the addition were reduced and made sympathetic to the original existing house then the project might be viable. 3. Retain the off-center entry as such a design element is'typical for Shingle era houses built during the I880s-90s, MOVER: Commissioner Harper SECONDER: Commissioner Surchin AYES: Webb, Surchin, Harper, McCarthy and Ostroski ABSTAINED: Commissioner Santana RESULT: Denie Signed: Tracey L.Dwyer,Application o rdinator for the Historic servation Commission Date: January 4,2021 v TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RMED HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION � ----------------------------------------------------------------------X FMAR ����' `�bR 12021 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF VINCENT BERTAULT Zonietg Board Of Appeals 9 NAVY STREET ORIENT,NEW YORK 11957 NOTICE OF APPEAL ---------------------------------------------------------------------X TO: THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: Vincent Bertault, by his attorneys Wickham, Bressler& Geasa, P.C.,hereby appeals to the Town Board of the Town of Southold pursuant to Southold Town Code 6 from the following action of the Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commission: Resolution# 10.22.20.2 dated both December 17, 2020 and January 4, 2021 which denied Vincent Bertault a Certificate of Appropriateness for proposed renovations and expansion of his residence at 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York and each and every part thereof, ("Resolution"). A copy of the Resolution is annexed hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. The basis for the appeal is set forth in detail in the Statement In Support Of Appeal annexed hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B. Dated: February 3, 2021 Mattituck,New York WICKHAM, B ESSLER& GEASA, P.C. By: Eric essler Attorneys for incent Bertault 13015 Main Road, P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck,New York 11952 631-298-8353 1 - To: William M. Duffy, Esq. Town Attorney for the Town of Southold 54375 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Town Board of the Town of Southold Attn: Elizabeth Neville J Southold Town Clerk 53095 Route 25, P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Southold Town Historic Preservation Commission 53095 Route 25, P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 - 2 RECMM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAR � A ���� HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ----------------------------------------------- Zoning Board Of Appeals IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF VINCENT BERTAULT 9 NAVY STREET STATEMENT IN ORIENT,NEW YORK 11957 ' SUPPORT OF APPEAL ---------------------------------------------------------------------X TO: THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: Vincent Bertault, ("Vincent"), by his attorneys Wickham, Bressler& Geasa, P.C., hereby submits this Statement in Support of his appeal from the denial by the Southold Town Historic Preservation Commission, ("HPC"), of his application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for renovations and expansion of his residence at 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY, ("Project"), Resolution#10.22.20.2 dated both December 17, 2020 and January 4, 2021, ("Resolution"). This statement sets forth the procedural history of the matter before the HPC, the facts concerning the Project, the description of the Resolution, and the bases for appeal. For the reasons set forth below the Resolution should be reversed and the Application granted. A. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Vincent made application by Gary O'Connor, Architect, to the HPC for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the Project on July 15, 2020. A copy of the application is annexed hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 1, ("Application"). An amended Application bearing even date was submitted on October 5, 2020. The amendment only removed from the Project a proposed accessory apartment. A copy of the amended Application is annexed hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 2. Thereafter, Vincent attended two pre-submission conferences on August 4, 2020 and August 18, 2020 at which the drawings of the Project were discussed. The first pre-submission conference was extremely brief, to wit, approximately 10 minutes, and HPC 1 provided no useful feedback. At the second pre-submission conference, HPC raised the issue of the height of the proposed addition. In response thereto, Vincent lowered the height of the proposed addition so as to be less than that of the existing house. A public hearing was held on the Project on September 29, 2020. At the public hearing, certain neighbors made largely irrelevant comments and objections and memorialized same in writing. Although the hearing was closed on September 29, 2020, HPC afforded a neighbor additional time to submit written comments. Vincent responded to all of the public comments. Copies of the comments are annexed hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 3. Vincent's responses to the comments are annexed hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 4. The matter then appeared on the HPC calendar for October 22, 2020 but no action was taken and the matter was further adjourned. (�v Despite the closing of the hearing on September 29, 2020, no determination on the Application was made within 60 days thereafter as required by Southold Town Code ("Code") §170-7(c)(1). Rather, on January 4, 2021 the Project next again appeared on the HPC calendar and at that time a motion to grant the Application was made and seconded and thereafter unanimously disapproved with one abstention. There was no motion made as to any particular reason for denial and no vote taken on any particular reason for denial. The HPC Coordinator was instructed to "write a letter"concerning the motion. When Vincent had not received anything in writing from HPC, his counsel contacted HPC counsel to ascertain the status of the matter. On January 15, 2021 a copy of the Resolution was e-mailed to Vincent's counsel. Copies of the recordings of the meetings have been requested but have not yet been received. Vincent now appeals to the Southold Town Board from the Resolution pursuant to Code §170-11. RECMED 2 7` GTS 1 Jq( gS MAR 112021 Zoning Board OfApp�al� w B. THE PROJECT The house at 95 Navy Street is a single-family residence in the Orient Historical District approximately 181 years old. The Project involves replacement of windows, doors, siding and roof and construction of an addition to the rear of the house and a porch extension, all utilizing materials consistent with those of the existing structure. The house is to be raised for FEMA compliance and a failing foundation replaced. The lines of the proposed addition closely match those of the original house and are consistent with other structures in the neighborhood. C. THE RESOLUTION The Resolution dated both D ecember 17, 2020 and January 4, 2021 denied the Application on the following stated grounds: (1) The front door was centered underneath a second-floor dormer; (2) The proposed addition is too high, without otherwise specifying an acceptable height. (3) The addition is too large and the style not consistent with neighborhood character. The Resolution made the following recommendations,presumably pursuant to Code §170-7(c)(3) (although the recommendations do not comply with Code requirements): (1) Convert the proposed gabled dormer on the east elevation fagade to a shed dormer or a greatly elongated gabled dormer because it would be "more historically accurate". (2) Reduce the scale of the addition in an unspecified manner and unquantified amount so that the Project"might be viable". (3) Retain an off-center front door entry because same was typical for homes of the 1880-90's. RCENED 3 -7 44 74- 7% LIAR A A 2021 Zoning Board Ofgppe REGSW MAR 112021 D. BASES FOR RELIEF honing Board Of,gppeals The Resolution is deficient procedurally in five respects and substantively in six respects and therefore should be reversed and a Certificate of Appropriateness issued for the Project. Each of those deficiencies is set forth below. 1. PROCEDUAL DEFICIENCIES The Application was plagued by procedural deficiencies from the outset. These procedural deficiencies continued through the Resolution. These procedural deficiencies include: (a) The initial pre-submission conference was utterly devoid of substance as HPC gave the Application virtually no attention. As a result, a second pre-submission conference was required. (b) At the public hearing the stated grounds upon which the Application was denied were either not discussed at all as in the case of the front door, or were not discussed with such specificity that Vincent could appropriately address them. (c) The HPC failed to comply.with requirements of Southold Town Code §170- 7(c)(1)and render a determination on the Application within 60 days of the conclusion of the public hearing on October 22, 2020. (d) The HPC failed to comply with the requirements of Southold Town Code §170-. 7(c)(3)by omitting from the.Resolution specific recommendations to Vincent regarding the Project such that he could receive approval. (e) The Resolution failed to recite the correct dates of the two pre-submission hearings and the two public hearings. 2. SUBSTANTIVE DEFICIENCES The Resolution is similarly plagued by substantive deficiencies, each of which separately, 4 and all of which taken together evidence arbitrariness and capriciousness. In particular: (a) The Resolution incorrectly asserts that the proposed front entry is not off-center. In fact, it is to the right of center as appears from the drawings. There is no evidence in the record that the door, as proposed, is inconsistent with those in the neighborhood. Moreover, the issue of the front door was never brought to Vincent's attention at either of the pre-submission hearings or either of the public hearing dates. Surely raising this issue on January 4, 2021 at a time when Vincent could not respond is patently inequitable and entirely arbitrary and capricious. Finally, raising of the home to meet FEMA requirements necessitated extended steps to the porch. In order to remain within the property line these steps were moved and the front door moved to a location opposite the steps. (b) The Resolution incorrectly asserts that the proposed addition to the rear of the existing structure is two stories high when, in fact, it is only one and one-half stories. Moreover, the height was reduced from the original proposal at the request of the HPC and was never subject to further request for reduction. (c) The Resolution incorrectly asserts that the proposed addition is not subservient to the original,structure. In fact, the proposed addition is of lesser height and, therefore, subservient to the original structure. The original structure is a two-story house and the proposed addition is a combination of a one-story and one and one-half story construction. Under Code 170-8 subservience is not one of the approval criteria. (d) The Resolution, in,purported Recommendation No. 2 asserts that the "project might be viable"if the scale of the addition were revised and made sympathetic to original existing house without specifying or quantifying the changes deemed to be necessary. Thus, any reapplication to the HPC would entirely be made blind. In this regard, its bears repeating that the RECWED °- -1 f--M 85C 5 LIAR R 1 2M Zoning Board Of Appeals 6 height of the Project was already reduced at the request of HPC and Vincent was never advised that such,a reduction was not acceptable. Thus; Recommendation No. 2 fails to comply with Code §170-7(c)(3). (e) The Resolution in purported Recommendation No. 1 references a shed dormer as opposed to the proposed gabled dormer as historically more accurate. This purported recommendation is entirely irrational since the existing structure has gabled dormers whose lines were substantially adopted in the Proposal for the new dormer. Thus, Recommendation No 1 is irrational. (f) The Resolution in purported Recommendation No. 1 references a gabled dormer which would pierce-the plane of the extension wall as historically more accurate than the proposed. This purported Recommendation is irrational and unsound in that such a recommendation would result in an unacceptably elongated dormer, dissimilar to existing dormers. Significantly, HPC approved a gabled dormer similar to Vincent's proposed gabled dormer on the house immediately to the west. Thus, Recommendation No. 1 is irrational. E. CONCLUSION The entire process before the HPC from initial submission of the Application to the Resolution was inconsistent with Code Article 170 both substantively and procedurally, thus prejudicing Vincent. After extensive impermissible delays, HPC denied the Application on bases which were never discussed, simply incorrect on the facts, and/or arbitrary and capricious. The entire process appears to have been driven by personal preferences of the HPC Committee members and the evident hostility of certain of the members and irrelevant comments from a few members of the community on the Project which was not based upon the Code or upon fact. Confirming the deficiencies in the process, HPC has failed to provide gu' ance a o 6 -?Wlk-716� MAR I I.2021 Zoning Board Of Appeals r^ approvability of the Application. Under these circumstances the Resolution should be reversed, the Application granted, and the Certificate of Appropriateness issued. Dated: February 3, 2021 Mattituck,New York WICKHAM, BRESTertault GEASA, P.C. By: Eric J. Bress Attorneys for Vince 13015 Main Road, P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, New York 11952 631-298-8353 RECEIVED To: William M. Duffy, Esq. MAR R R 2021 Town Attorney for the Town of Southold 54375 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Zoning Board Of Appeals Southold,NY 11971 7 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS --------------------------------------------------------X In the matter of the application Application No. 7468SE Of Vincent Bertault For a special exception for AFFIDAVIT OF Accessory apartment FAMILIAL RELATIONSHIP --------------------------------------------------------X STATE OF NEW YORK ) ����+ )ss.. -NW)S-- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) MAR 11 2021 Vincent Bertault, being duly sworn, deposes and says: Z®ning�pdrd®f Appeals 1. I am the applicant for a special exception to permit an accessory apartment at 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York. I make this affidavit in support of my application for a special exception for an accessory apartment at my property at 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York. 2. As set forth in my application, I intend to reside at the accessory apartment while my principal residence undergoes renovation. I do not have another place to live while this is occurring. 3. After the renovation, I intend to move back into the principal residence and provide occupancy in the accessory apartment to Yau Chun Lin, the parent of my domestic partner, Claudia Lin. 4. Claudia Lin and I have been domestic partners for 12 years. During that time, we have resided together as domestic partners in a single location. Since 2011 we have lived together at the 95 Navy Street location. 5. The proposed occupancy by Yau Chun Lin satisfies the requirements of the Southold Town Code for occupancy by a family member since she qualifies as a family member under the definition of family members in the code to wit: the parent of my domestic partner. WHEREFORE, I respectfully ask the Z 'ng Board of Appea s to rove the application for a special exception. ® 4M Vincent Be au Sworn to before me this 10`h day of March, 2 21. —cle/� -✓� ryl Simone Notary blic PNo.3i-49703411ow Yo* Qualified In Suffolk County t Commission Expires February 4,10®� DAWN - HOUSE MOVERS, 1 Manor Rd. Yaphank, NY 11980 631 -924-3818 phone 631 -924-1598 fax House Moving-House Raising-House Shoring-Rigging Customer Contractual Agreement RECMED Date: March 8, 2021 -74V7+_746 S9 Customer: Vincent Bertault MAR IR 2021 95 Navy St Orient, NY 11957 - ning Board Of Appeals Phone number: (917) 667 4166 Email: vbertault@yahoo.com Job: 95 Navy- St, Orient NY 11957 Dawn House Movers hereby certifies that our company is fully insured and bonded. Dawn House Movers agrees to: supply all labor and equipment to raise the house on the property, as presently located so new foundation can be excavated. Owner/contractor is to do all disconnects - water, gas, plumbing, electric, etc. When the foundation is completed by another contractor, Dawn will lower the house on new foundation and pull out all equipment. For the total sum of: $22,500.00 Half due upon raising, balance due immediately upon lowering Agreement: The total price includes required insurance and over-the-road moving permits. Any changes in the above specifications shall be made in writing, and as evidence of agreement, shall be signed by both parties. The contractor shall not be held responsible or liable for any loss, damage or delay due to causes beyond his control, including negligence of another contractor on the job, or any act of God including wind and water.- If the owner or contractor disposes of the property by sale or otherwise before this contract has been fulfilled, then the full unpaid amount of the contract shall become due and payable at once. Acceptance: The above agreement and terms of payment are hereby accepted and you are authorized to do the work as specified. Contractor: Dawn House Movers Customer: By: Date: DAWN HOUSE MOVERS 1 Manor Rd. Yaphank, NY 11980 631 -924-3818 phone 631 -924-1598 fax House Moving-House Raising-House Shoring-Rigging - Customer Contractual Agreement Date: March 8, 2021, .? AECMED Customer: Vincent Bertault -] ( 7f 7,i� g�S 95 Navy St MAR 112021 Orient, NY 11957 Phone number: (917) 667 4166 Zoning�ardOfApp�l _ Email: vbertauit@yahoo.com Job: 95 Navy St, Orient NY 11957 Dawn House Movers hereby certifies that our company is fully insured and bonded. Dawn House Movers agrees to: supply all labor and equipment to relocate the house on the property (17' North), move off existing site so new foundation can be excavated. Owner/contractor is to do all disconnects - water, gas, plumbing, electric, etc. When the foundation is completed by another contractor, Dawn will move the house back, lower and pull out all equipment. For the total sum of: $52,500.00 Half due upon raising, barlance due immediately upon lowering Agreement: The total price includes required insurance and over-the-road moving permits. Any changes in the above specifications shall be made in writing, and as evidence of agreement, shall be signed by both parties. The contractor shall not be held responsible or liable for any loss, damage or delay due to causes beyond his control, including negligence of another contractor on the job, or any act of God including wind and water. If the owner or contractor disposes of the property by sale or otherwise before this contract has been fulfilled, then the full unpaid amount of the contract shall become due and payable at once. Acceptance: The above agreement and terms of payment are hereby accepted and you are authorized to do the work as specified. Contractor: Dawn House Movers Customer: By: Date: BRIAN HARRIS 320 EAST 18-STREET New York,New York 10003 Telephone 64611564297 Southold Town Tax Receiver, Justice Court RECEIVE.® 53095 Main Road �` o 1" 7 4-g P.O Box 1409 MAR I 17021 zoning Hoard OfAppeels Southold, NY 11971 RE: Vincent Bertault Residence To Whom It May Concern: I own 320 East 18tb Street, NY, NY 10003 in Manhattan. At one time Mr. Bertault rented an apartment there from 2001 to 2008. He has not lived there since over 12 years. Please contact me if you need anything further. Sincerely, BrianDyn.N�ne.,iDn i14DN.n.Brun Nu�ao4 v ..d.wmrovm,a.w. r.u5 Harri 5-D.,r�,o,�,.�,-0,� Brian Harris LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER& GEASA,P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD,P.O.BOX-1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565 ebressler@wbglawyers.com March 11,2021 REMVED Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals _740-t W68-Sc, 53095 Main Road A 1 2021 P.O. Box 1179 � � Zoning Southold,New York 11971-0959 9 hoard Of,gppeals Re: Appeal No. 7467 and Appeal No. 7468SE Property owned by Vincent Bertault("Applicant") 95 Navy Street, Orient, New York- SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 Ladies and Gentlemen: We are the attorneys for the Applicant and write in furtherance of our letter of March 10,2021 regarding this matter. We enclose 8 copies of letter dated March 11, 2021 from Joseph Fischetti, Structural Engineer, as to the inadvisability,probable damage, and costs of moving the structure rather than raising and lowering it. We therefore believe that movement of the structure is not a feasible or reasonable alternative. We also enclose copy of e-mail chain dated January 12, 2021 from Damon Rallis, Southold Town Building Department Inspector, to Gary O'Connor, Architect, providing approval of the Grading and Drainage Plan by the Building Department. Thank you for your consideration of this material. Very truly yours, Eri EJB/cs Encls cc— Vincent Bertault. i FISLo LE—r m March 11, 2021 Eric Bressler,Esq. Wickham Bressler Geasa 13015 Main Ro , ;.rt- . .Y„s.; ' ;s,tx,r"a;-: Y# �iH�jrx�rffj ft"M1 ,•i.K,1�t._"—` J y.; ^+>.��; �qW t�`` ^.�,y .�i;��.. ,a t4 , Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: 85 Navy Street Orient NY Dear Mr.Bressler I inspected the above referenced structure on March 10,2021 to evaluate it regarding moving the structure.You must be cautious when proposing to move an early 19th_century building such as this.These homes were constructed with st"ructur'alymembers;.that`today �s would be considered undersized. Without municipal oversight construction protocols ;4 good the lead carpenter was: were based on how _ - '.`"rh°,a •{.'i,`:1"�-t:.L.•. _•,(S,t:•+.,.`-+'�,trn a�,�;n�,'.�+i L. Lifting a home in place and brin i n- g it back_ down generates'°^nr'u�nuwsd a�l;for+�ces"o•-ri"a ' structure.The forces are in line with gravity. Moving ahome"can cause r`ational'fo"rces and possibly torsional forces that acton the-fragile structure-.-S&lid,`parts of the building such as plaster and masonry flues could be greatly affected by these;forces.Connections between hidden structural members could be compromised and'riot seen. This home has'a unique,structural feature.There is a 2nd floor"dorm'er in the front of the home that extends,over the porch that has no supports fromnbelow';The 2nd floor was extended out from the first-floor walls without visile su ott ypb� pp : Thefloor•,joists,on,the,2nd,+.w-„ floor are not cantilevered°because the floor joists span;inale other dlrectton �4 �f } _ - ..j","- r.i`+y vit. ,Z'�`�'1\;t�,,.A ire"',:y7,` .rt,"t, ,�� '` t�ylti\_:.�.•,.t 1,`.:� I have seen older structures such as this where''h`carpenters;used'steel rods'for support:,,. Inspecting this dormer,I find this must beztle,case'but•it•hasbeen'Kidderi�rom�view.'� :%,:•'-�.�,,_\� - I do vi;' �r: shy �r r','t�',i-.��•r; „R,;�b,_z- -;�`�;��5�;;' not know what the forces -moving • o rig the holn'e:will�ha've�ori�tlis'unique'''architectural��;��.4c.� ,°"-- feature.Moving could cause it irreparable damage. BOARD CERTIFIED IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING JOSEPH@FIS CHETTI.COM FISCHETTIENGINEERING.COM 63 1 -765-2954 1 72 5 H O B A R T ROAD S O U T H O L D , N E W YORK 1 1 97 1 Page 1 � _ -«q wS �'y t5y�• ,r� J,. {f,(4Y'*flc. ifi�7'`{••i• � av}.x1�vt_�F_' r- - _-���{:,rtq�;f�,� a 1* rr r ,:``'* 3",iy,�:,. ,Kis"„i.M'5`.' rye., EJ�,'�,'.1, •}i„> - �. ��t t' .J}=�^.i.�-:�`K,`;F'.�y,�t_; ".se �•itF�'i,r_ �,F-'ti��.�. ..:". ,_ ' /( f • .alis^ '°! -"'4 asa,,. to •e ,. a y'�1iZs>.•'>,:`',. ,:Y K'ir'k;�Y.` .. - "�,+..�`;`,.5�,�` -'�tr'y.y�,; 1 s+"` w..��n r,,, 1” �il;i ;;4_`,., ,7.`. -i4�' rr�i-,�L�\'xi,5;.•,a .. t - t r ;xq.ra eta � +*a»na � H`"�i�. '.:r':.;.�;i�`�,f'n'{i�''"`.a"i'x.':,r5•:f:,,�"''/s� _ ''n'! e»: ``= ,. A � �mss, r �;rt � `�, � �3�•�. ;;?;:.`_'z, -..,, ,.a t ,_( -, ._ 1 44FfddE&'3�3! .,rexarh�t�,.r.. u�-s ,,,,,• ' ' t�y ' �L-TiYA$+Xi[ei.5j${yy.si.b ..VGyS rTn ` .•{�'3"H .. tt5VM7A • ' ; __ - nsirY.Y�'•_ rS< fl�!'Y, _ s���.'i� ,�„�f• - - ��5"��JS Sl....Y-:iF•.'!'�.: - 'Y..,.s;t �.5'.j.r _ s`•5.,..r � y A + f`rl,s Jars `�,j}'f�S'rsvti r .. ,. • i +. � . '.. :."t-. , e r S• The costs to move a structure from an existingfoundationfo-4aitterent location;increase,"„ greatly from keeping the existing location.Liftingand;replacing=a;home: ri`thesame" 4;s rrt:,- �,. location for a small house can cost about$20,000.00:Tofmove;xthat'`s�a'me h'ouse,`tlecost could be more than double in the$50,000.00: Existing utilities can be,reinstalled in the same,locationwwhil`e`mov ri ;a=buildirig;requires'' R,, the costly extension of those utilities.The new location requireda-new excava'tio`n=for,,,il e new foundation and the backfilling,of the existing location.New landscaping will also be required.' BOARD CERYWIED IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING J0SEPH@F1SCHETTI.COM FISCHETTIENGINEERING.COM 631 -765-2954 1 72 5 H O B A R T ROAD S O U T H O L D , N E w YORK 1 1 97 1 Page 2 � F m to , t� `_� L m 3 iE 'N 1,C I 'N � R 1 , S , BOARD CERTIFIED IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING JOSEPH@FISCHETTI.COM FISCHETTIENGINEERING.COM 631 -765-2954 1 725 H O B A R T ROAD S O U T H O L D , N E W YORK 1 1 197 1 Page 3 s •n From:Gary O'Connor Sent:Wednesday,January13,202110:09 AM To: Rallis, Damon<Damon.Rallis@town.southold.ny.us> Subject: RE:95 Navy Street Grading Plan Thanks Damon. From: Rallis, Damon<_Damon.Rallis town Southold ny us> Sent.,Wednesday,January 13,20219:29 AM To:-,Gary O'Connor<gary@grocarchitects com> Subject:RE:95 Navy Street Grading Plan No fee due—all copies are distributed here to the appropriate files—we do not automatically send one to you unless you request one—unless a fee is due—if you want a copy you can call Sue at 631-765-1802 From: Gary O'Connor rmailto:aary�grocarchitects com] Sent: Wednesday,January 13, 20219:23 AM To: Rallis, Damon Cc: vbertault Subject: RE: 95 Navy Street Grading Plan Good Morning Damon, Question; How are the field copies being distributed? Does the Owner or Contractor need to come in and pick them up? Are they mailed? Is there a fee to be paid? Thanks, Gary From: Rallis, Damon<Damon.RallisPtown.southold ny us> Sent:Tuesday,January 12, 20218:22 AM To:Gary O'Connor<gary@grocarchitects.com> Subject: RE:95 Navy Street Grading Plan I'm sorry Gary—I thought I told you, it was already approved.Thanks From: Gary O'Connor fma!Ito:aary(&grocarchitects com] Sent:Tuesday,January 12, 20217:46 AM To: Rallis, Damon 1 Cc: John Condon Subject: 95 Navy Street Grading Plan Good Morning Damon, Is there any update on the Approval of the Grading and Drainage Plan that was submitted last month by Condon Engineering? Thanks, Gary R. O'Connor, AIA Architect 8 Coryell Street Lambertville, NJ 08530 609-397-3635 Office 609-613-0999 Mobile ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 2 TwomeyM Latham I�ov 2 SHEA, KELLEY, DUBIN & QUARTARARO, LLP Thomas A.Twomey,Jr. (1945-2014) November 22, 2021 I John F.Shea,III Christopher D.Kelley By Email and Federal Express David M.Dubin A Jay P Quartararo t Ms. Leslie Kanes Weisman Peter M.Mott Chairperson Janice L.Snead Bryan C.Van Cott . Zoning Board of Appeals Kathryn Dalli Reza Ebrahimi Town of Southold Jeffrey W Pagano n Karen A.Hoeg 53095 Main Road Bernadette E.Tuthill P.O Box 1179 Craig H.Handler Bryan J.Drago Southold,NY 11971-0959 Daniel R.Bernard tA/ SENIOR COUNSEL Re: Variance Application No. 7467 and Stephen B.Latham Special Exception Application No. 7468SE ASSOCIATES Katerma Grinko Property of Vincent Bertault ' Lorraine Paceleo 95 Navy Street Orient Town of Southold,New York Terrence Russell > > Christina M.Noon t SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 A Chadwick Bnedis Martha F.Reichert MaryKate L.Brigham Dear Chairperson Weisman and Members of the Board: OF COUNSEL Lisa Clare Kombnnk Kevin M.Fox This firm has very recently been retained by numerous neighbors and Patricia J.Russell members of the Orient community in connection with their concerns and Jennifer P.Nigro Craig Gibson opposition to the above-referenced applications for 95 Navy Street, which are Joan Morgan McGivern Scott Handwerker currently pending before this Board. NY&LA BARS t LL M IN TAXATION While we are still reviewing the ZBA7 HPC, and Town Board files, we ♦ NY&NJ BARS / ■ NY,NJ&OC BARS believe that the respective records before these Board's show procedural NY,NJ&FL BARS irregularities, including a potential jurisdictional defect, warranting the following Main Office actions: (1)that the ZBA hold off from making a determination until these 33 West Second St. P.O. Box 9398 irregularities and jurisdictional defect can be investigated and resolved; and(2) a Riverhead, NY 1'1901 re-opening of the ZBA's public hearing record to elicit comments from the public sffolkl w.co and from the HPC regarding the barn, the current stop work order, and any other 2180 suffolklaw.com elements of the applicant's project that merit the HPC's comments, or remand the application to the HPC for a certificate of appropriateness. On October 22, 2020, the HPC issued Resolution#10.22.20 (the "Denial"), which denied the applicant a certificate of appropriateness for alterations and an addition to the house. Pursuant to Southold Town Code §170- 11, within 30 days of a decision, an applicant may file an appeal with the Town Board to review the decision using the same record that was before the Commission. The Applicant appealed the decision, and on April 15, 2021, the HPC, and not the Town Board,resolved to withdraw the appeal and accept amended drawings upon the recommendation of the Southold Town Legal Page 2 November 22, 2021 Department- even though these amended drawings were submitted on a closed record for which a final determination had already been rendered five months prior, without any notice or hearine The HPC then made a motion to withdraw the previously issued denial in Resolution #10.22.20.2 and accept the amended drawings "as applied for." Chapter 170 does not authorize the HPC to determine the outcome of an appeal of one of its decisions or to rescind and withdraw a prior rendered resolution of denial under the rubric of"Old Business."Any revised plans submitted after the Denial should have been considered as a new application and a public hearing should have been held with notice to interested parties pursuant to Town Code §170-7(B). In other words,the HPC was without jurisdiction when it approved a certificate of appropriateness for the alterations and additions to the house,which are now the subject of an application before the ZBA. Not only are these events highly irregular,but they could constitute a jurisdictional defect that renders the HPC's approval void. See Hampshire Mgmt. Co. v. Feiner 52 A.D.3d 714, 715, 860 N.Y.S.2d 204 (2d Dept. 2008);Eastport Alliance v. Lofaro, 13 A.D.3d 527, 529, 787 N.Y.S.2d 346 (2d Dept. 2004) . Although the ZBA closed the hearing record on the subject applications at their October 7, 2021 meeting,the hearing transcript shows that the question of whether the barn's ramp had been approved by_the HPC remains unresolved. The current stop work order was issued because several aspects of the barn are not in compliance with the HPC's 2014 certificate of appropriateness. Therefore,the HPC's comments must be considered by the ZBA rior to rendering,a determination on the instant applications and prior to any recission of the stop work order. We appreciate the ZBA considering these significant issues, and we hope we will be able "to work towards resolving them in the interest of compliance with the law. Kindly file this letter in the record of this matter. Thank you. Sincerely, d V. Reichert Cc: Bill Duffy, Esq. Ms. Mariella Ostroski John Burke, Esq. Mr. Michael Verity Westermann, Donna From: Fuentes, Kim Sent: Friday, June 04, 2021 10:12 AM To: Eric Dantes;Weisman, Leslie; Planamento, Nicholas; Patricia Acampora; Rob Lehnert Cc: Westermann, Donna; Sakarellos, Elizabeth Subject: Bertault HPC 2014 Records Below is the link to the Bertault HPC Cert. of Appropriation in 2014. http://24.38.28.228:2040/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=999897&searchid=fddd4ec2-5b45-4ad7- b0ab-1465e8e63ba1&dbid=0 Kim E. Fuentes Board Assistant Zoning Board of Appeals 631-765-1809 kimE&southoIdtownnv.go Location:54375 Main Road Mail:R 0. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11952 1 ' � o�4guEF0�,�co James Grathwohl,Chairperson �$ (sem Town Hall Annex James Garretson,Vice Chair PO Box 1179 0 Donald Feiler COM 54375 Route 25 Anne Surchin 4� Southold,NY 11971 Gary Parker �1�1 �QFax(631)765-9502 Robert Harper Telephone: (631)765-1802 Edward Webb www.southoldtownny.gov Damon Rallis,Administrative Assistant July 14, 2014 To: William Gesell 11 Harrison Avenue Red Bank,NJ 07701 RE: SCTM#1000-26-1-12.2.—95 Navy Street, Orient—Proposed relocation of existing historic barn/garage Mr. Gesell: In response to your letter dated July 9, 2014,there has been no written correspondence or oral conversations between the LPC or its representatives and Mr. Bertault or his representatives since the June 17, 2014 public hearing. Please be advised that the public hearing was closed on June 17, 2014 and the LPC is not taking any more comments on the application from either side. In the future,please be aware that any requests for documentation must be made through the Town Clerk's office through a Freedom of Information request. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(631) 765-1802 Respectfully Yours, c7y %- amon eter Ra Adminis ssistant On behalf of James Grathwohl, Chairman, Southold Town Landmarks Preservation Commission July 9, 2014 Mr.James Grathwohl, Chair and Members of the Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commission Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Commission review of proposed barn relocation on the Bertault property located at 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY 11957 Dear Chair and Board Members: Since I have not heard that a decision has been made I can only assume that there is still ongoing discussion on this case. As the spokesperson for the 54 individuals who signed the petition presented to you at your June 17, 2014 meeting we request the following information in the interest of keeping your decision process open and fair to all. 1.A copy of any written correspondence or summary of any oral conversations with Mr. Bertault, or his representative(s),by any member of the Historic Preservation Commission or their 'representatives since June 17,2014. 2.A copy of any written correspondence or summary of any oral conversations from Mr. Bertault, or his representative(s)regarding above. Once the requested information is received,I request that the Commission provide adequate time so that this information can be shared with all 54 individuals who signed petition and allow us the opportunity to provide information,regarding 1 &2 above, so that the Commission has input from all interested parties to use in the decision process of preserving the Orient Historic District. Please send any correspondence to: William Gesell 11 Harrison Ave,Red Bank, N107701 732-616-9005 Sincerely, William Gesell " ' O�%pF SO(/r�ol Telephone (631)765-1802 ti O Town Hall,53095 Route 25 Fax (631)765-9502 J P.O.Box 1179 CA -INC Southold,New York 1197151 -0959 C4UiI[Y,� � ��� SOUTHOLD TOWN LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION#6.17.14.1 June 18,2014 Certificate of of Appropriateness RE: 95 Navy Street, Orient,SCTM#1000-26-1-12.2 Owner: Vincent Bertault RESOLUTION: WHEREAS, 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY is on the Town of Southold,New York State and National Registers of Historic Places, and WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 56-7 (b)of the Town Law(Landmarks Preservation Code) of the Town of Southold,all proposals for material change/alteration must be reviewed and granted a Certificate of Appropriateness by the Southold Town Landmarks Preservation Commission prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, and WHEREAS, an application was submitted to relocate an existing accessory barn and an accessory shed on February 28,2014 and WHEREAS Commissioners met with the applicant to review the proposed project on April 15, 2014, and WHEREAS, a public hearing for the purpose of considering approval of the proposal was held on June 17, 2014,and WHEREAS, the proposed relocation of the historic barn and shed, according to the plans submitted,will result in the structures being restored and preserved as is,and WHEREAS, the proposed relocation of the barn and shed will afford the applicant the ability to maximize the use of his property while preserving the character of the structures,and WHEREAS, the relationship between the existing barn structure and the main dwelling was significantly altered when the property was previously subdivided with Southold Town Planning Board approval, and WHEREAS, there are longstanding precedents for relocating such historic structures throughout the Hamlet of Orient and the Town of Southold, and WHEREAS, the new front yard location of the barn structure(facing Willow Street)is in keeping with other properties in the surrounding area,and WHEREAS, the proposed relocation of the bam structure was approved by the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals(#6729)on April 17, 2014,and WHEREAS, the applicant has agreed to make a good faith effort to preserve the property's existing trees and shrubs (particularly the holly trees)during the relocation process, and WHEREAS, a letter was submitted to the Landmarks Preservation Commission on July 30, 2014,by Michael Johnson, of Johnson Tree Co., Orient, outlining how to protect the willow tree adjacent to the proposed location of the bam structure.The letter will be part of the applicant's final building permit application and,it appears that the project requires no further review, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the Southold Town Landmarks Preservation Commission determines that the proposal as outlined in plans dated October 18,2013, and amended on January 21, 2014,on May 28, 2014,and last amended on June 11, 2014,by Gary R. O'Conner, architect,meet the criteria for approval under Section 170-8 (A)of the Southold Town Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the Commission approves the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness. MOVER: James Grathwohl, Chairman SECONDER:James Garretson, Commissioner AYES: Surchin,Parker,Feiler, Garretson,Grathwohl NAYES:Harper ABSTAINED:Webb RESULT:APPROVED Please note that any deviation from the approved plans referenced above may require further review from the commission. Si4es i Ja Grat ohl, Chairman,Landmarks Preservation Commission Date: TBD James Grathwohl,Chairperson ��OSufFOC,tC�Gy Town Hall Annex Donald Feiler Q 54375 Route 25 James Garretson W PO Box 1179 Anne Surchin Oy • Southold,NY 11971 Gary Parker '�101 �•a4�' Fax(631)765-9502 Robert Harper Telephone: (631)765-1802 Damon Rallis,Administrative Assistant southoldtown.northfork.net Town of Southold Landmark Preservation Commission Minutes 3:00 p.m.,May 20,2014 Southold Town Hall Annex Conference Room Attendees: James Grathwohl,Donald Feiler,James Garretson,Anne Surchin, Gary Parker, and Robert Harper Guests: Mark Terry,Principal Planner, Southold Town Planning Department; 1. Call to Order: 3:00 PM II. Approval of Minutes • The minutes of the April 15,2014 minutes were approved unanimously. III. Chairman's Remarks • The chairman discussed progress made at Village House, in Orient, and urged fellow commissioners to attend an open house event there on Saturday,May 31. • He announced that an administrative permit had been issued for work at the Charnews property, 52180 Route 25, Southold(SCTM# 1000.-63.-6-8). • Chairman Grathwohl announced that he would begin preparing quarterly reports to the town board. • He asked that Administrative,Assistant Damon Rallis invite Richard Wines,of the Riverhead Town Landmarks Commission,to come to the next regularly scheduled meeting to discuss the proposed historic corridor project. IV. Meeting with Mark Terry,Principal Planner, Southold Town Planning Department (re:Draft Historic Church Memorandum) • Mark Terry presented options for preserving historic church buildings in Southold Town and recommended the"floating zone"option as outlined in the draft memo. • After further discussion, commissioners agreed that this was the best route and agreed to attend a follow-up meeting on the issue with the Southold Town Board on June 3, 2014. • Damon Rallis agreed to meet with Mark Terry before that date to do additional code research on the language used in the memo (re:fagade easements). • The commission voted to hold a"special meeting"on June 3, 2014 at 8:30 a.m. to discuss the matter further,before meeting with the town board. (Resolution#5.20.14.1) V. Interview/discuss candidates for open commission seat left vacant by the resignation of Doug Constant • The commission voted to enter into executive session to discuss the commission's recommendation, based on two applicants interested in the position. o Commissioners interviewed both candidates,Patricia Butler and Edward Webb. • Commissioners discussed the candidates and their resumes. • The commission voted to exit executive session and reopened the public meeting. • The commission voted and passed a resolution to recommend Edward Webb, of Orient, to the Southold Town Board for appointment to the open position on the Southold Town Landmarks Commission. (Resolution#5.20.14.2) VI. Set Public Hearings g • Commissioners voted to set a public hearing for Tuesday,June 17, at 3:30 p.m. regarding Bertault(Gary O'Conner,architect):Proposed relocation of existing historic barn/garage at 95 Navy Street, Orient. Suffolk County Tax Map#1000-26-1-12.2. (Resolution#5.20.14.3) • Commissioners voted to set a public hearing for Tuesday,July 15, at 3.30 p.m. regarding Asch(Nancy Steelman,Architect):Proposed additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling at 290 Skippers Lane,Orient. Suffolk County Tax Map# 1000-25-1-1. (Resolution#5.20.14.4) VII. Old Business • Chairman James Grathwohl outlined a plan to restore the Ben Franklin Mile markers with commitments from Zack Studenroth and Scott Russell. Chairman Grathwohl said he would invite Mr. Studenroth to a future meeting to discuss the proposal. VIII. New Business • Chairman James Grathwohl discussed Southold Town's planned 3750'Anniversary Celebration. • Commissioner Anne Surchin distributed copies of a draft law being proposed in Southampton Town regarding incentives for landmarking carriage houses within the Town of Southampton. She asked commissioner to review the proposal for discussion at a future meeting. lli:FO(,l-�O James Grathwohl,Chairperson �,Y� Gy Town Hall Annex Donald Feiler Q 54375 Route 25 James Garretson w PO Box 1179 Anne Surchin 0 • Southold,NY 11971 Gary Parker '�pl �.a0�' Fax(631)765-9502 Robert Harper Telephone:(631)765-1802 Damon Rallis,Administrative Assistant southoldtown.northfork.net Town of Southold Landmark Preservation Commission RESOLUTION #5.20.14.1 May 20,2014 �v Set Special Meeting to discuss the Southold Town Planning Department's "Draft Historic Church Memorandum" RESOLUTION: Set special meeting regarding draft historic church memo WHEREAS, The Southold Town Board has directed the Southold Planning Board and the Southold Town Landmarks Preservation Commission to come up with a solution to save threatened historic church buildings within the,Town of Southold,and WHEREAS, The Southold Landmarks Commission met with Principal Planner Mark Terry regarding a draft memo on the subject,and WHEREAS, The Southold Town Landmarks Commission has been invited to discuss the issue with the Southold Town Board during its regular work session on June 3,20I4, and WHEREAS The Southold Town Landmarks Preservation Commission would like to discuss the matter further, in advance of the meeting NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the Southold Town Landmarks Preservation Commission hereby calls for a special meeting to be held in the Southold Town Hall Annex second floor conference room on June 3,2014 at 8:30 am RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER:James Grathwohl,Chairperson SECONDER: Robert Harper,Commissioner AYES: Feiler, Garretson, Surchin,Parker oy�gUFFOt�-co James Grathwohl,Chairperson ,`� Gy Town Hall Annex Donald Feiler 54375 Route 25 0 James Garretson coo PO Box 1179 Anne Surchiny • Southold,NY 11971 Gary Parker ,- `' Fax(631)765-9502 Robert Harper Telephone:(631)765-1802 Damon Rallis,Administrative Assistant southoldtown.northfork.net Town of Southold Landmark Preservation Commission RESOLUTION#5.20.14.2 ( 1o /1 May 20,2014 /�"I'�\ Fill Open seat on the Southold Town Landmarks Preservation Commission` ` RESOLUTION: Recommendation to appoint Edward Webb to the position of Commissioner on the Southold Town Landmarks Preservation Commission WHEREAS, The Southold Town Landmarks Preservation Commission accepted the resignation of Commissioner Doug Constant effective March 18,2014,and WHEREAS, The Southold Town Clerk advertised the open position and called for resumes from interested parties to fill the vacancy,and WHEREAS, The Southold Town Landmarks Preservation Commission received two resumes for the open position and interviewed both candidates,and WHEREAS The Southold Town Landmarks Preservation Commission members believed that candidate Edward Webb, of Orient,was best suited for the position. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the Southold Town Landmarks Preservation Commission hereby recommends that the Southold Town Board appoint Edward Webb to the position of Landmark's Preservation Commissioner to fill the vacancy left by the resignation of Doug Constant. RESULT:ADOPTED MOVER:James Garretson,Commissioner SECONDER:Robert Harper,Commissioner AYES: Surchin,Parker NAYS:Feiler,Grathwohl i o��gUFFU(�-�O James Grathwohl,Chairperson I �� Gy Town Hall Annex Donald Feiler o 54375 Route 25 James Garretson w PO Box 1179 Anne Surchin • rF Southold,NY 11971 Gary Parker Fax(631)765-9502 Robert Harper Telephone:(631)765-1802 Damon Rallis,Administrative Assistant, southoldtown.northfork.net Town of Southold Landmark Preservation Commission RESOLUTION#5.20.14.3 �t J May 20,2014 Set Public Hearing RESOLUTION: Set Public Hearing for the proposed relocation of an existing historic banVgarage at 95 Navy Street,Orient.(SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2) WHEREAS, The Southold Town Board has met in a pre-submission conference with the architect and owner of the property at 95 Navy Street in Orient regarding the proposed relocation of an existing historic barn/garage, and i WHEREAS, The applicant is prepared to present the project at a public hearing as required by the Southold Town Code. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the Southold Town Landmarks Preservation Commission sets a public hearing regarding the Bertault application(Gary O'Connor,Architect): Proposed relocation of existing historic barn/garage at 95 Navy Street, Orient. Suffolk County Tax Map# 1000-26-1-12.2,at 3:30 p.m. on Tuesday,June 17,2014 in the Southold Town Hall annex second floor conference room. RESULT:ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER:James Garretson,Commissioner SECONDER:Robert Harper,Commissioner AYES: Surchin,Parker,Feiler,Grathwohl i i I I I I o�OgUEF���-�o James Grathwohl,Chairperson ,`� Gy Town Hall Annex Donald Feiler 4 54375 Route 25 James Garretson `" PO Box 1179 Anne Surchin y • Southold,NY 11971 Gary Parker 'jJpl �.a0�' Fax(631)765-9502 Robert Harper Telephone:(631)765-1802 Damon Rallis,Administrative Assistant southoldtown.northfork.net Town of Southold Landmark Preservation Commission �Cv RESOLUTION#5.20.7.4.4 r�n J May 20,2014 A Set Public Hearing RESOLUTION: Set Public Hearing for proposed additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling at 290 Skippers Lane,Orient.(SCTM# 1000-25-1-1) WHEREAS, The Southold Town Board has met in a pre-submission conference with the architect/applicant for a proposed project at 290 Skippers Lane in Orient, regarding additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling,and WHEREAS, The applicant is prepared to present the project at a public hearing as required by the Southold Town Code. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the Southold Town Landmarks Preservation Commission sets a public hearing regarding the Asche application(Nancy Steelman,Architect): Proposed additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling at 290 Skippers Lane, Orient.Suffolk County Tax Map#1000-25-1-1,at 3:30 p.m.on Tuesday,July 15,2014 in the Southold Town Hall annex second floor conference room. RESULT:ADOPTED (UNANIMOUS] MOVER:James Grathwohl,Chairman SECONDER: Robert Harper, Commissioner AYES: Surchin,Parker,Feiler,Garretson �i� BOARD MEMBERS SO Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson 'Olaf �TiyO 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 l4 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantes �� Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Homing 'sc0 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider `�'COUNI� Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfoxk.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS !1 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 i, 1 APR 22 2014 fPUT `' J FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION D MEETING OF APRIL 17,2014 ZBA FILE: 6729 NAME OF APPLICANT:Vincent Bertault PROPERTY LOCATION: 95 Navy Street(adj.to Willow Street)Orient,NY. CTM#1000-26-1-12.2 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without fiuther steps under SEQRA. LWRP DETERMINATION: The relief, permit, or interpretation requested in this application is listed under the Minor Actions exempt list and is not subject to review under Chapter 268. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property is a 19,905 sq.ft. in the R-40 Zone.The northerly Iot line measures 65.93 feet along Willow St., plus 54.53 feet along an adjacent residential parcel.The easterly lot line measures 154.15 feet along a residential parcel. The southerly lot line measures 103.57 feet along Navy St., and the westerly lot line measures 207.70 feet along another parcel. The property is improved with a single family dwelling, and two accessory structures (a barn and a shed), as shown with the existing, and the proposed, new accessory structure locations, on the survey drawn by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. dated Dec. 12. 2012, and the site plan A.1 drawn by Gary R.O'Connor,dated Oct. 18,2013. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variance from Article III Section 280-15 and the Building Inspector's October 15,2013,Renewed January 24,2014 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for relocation of existing accessory barn and shed,at; 1)accessory barn and shed proposed in a location other than the code required rear yard. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to move two accessory structures from existing nonconforming front yard locations,to a new nonconforming front yard location. The code requires all accessory structures, except in the case of waterfront parcels,be located in the rear yard. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The applicant's property is a through lot with frontage on two streets, and therefore has two front yards and no rear yard. The subject barn is estimated to have been built at sometime in the 1920's, and the shed was also built at some time prior to the enactment of the Town Zoning Code. The applicant wishes to preserve and restore both accessory structures and to relocate them to eliminate the current need to drive cars over the existing septic system and to create more open space for gardening and recreation in the center of his property. The file contains two letters of objection submitted by an agent of adjacent neighbors stating some concerns regarding the applicant's proposed project. The neighbor's agent submitted written information on the history of the subject property. The applicant's proposed project is subject to the review and approval by the Town Page 2 of 3 April 17,2014 ZBA#6729—Bertault 4SUMP 1000-26-1-12.2 Landmark Preservation Committee. The applicant submitted a letter dated March 13, 2014 proposing to relocate the barn with a 25 foot front yard setback from Willow Street instead of the 20 feet setback as originally proposed. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this'application on March 6,2014,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law&267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variances to relocate two accessory structures,an existing,historic barn and shed from pre-existing, non-conforming front yard areas into new, non-conforming front yard locations will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant's property is located in an historic district that includes numerous buildings, including both principal dwellings and accessory structures, with non-conforming setbacks; all situated in locations that pre-date zoning. Many accessory structures are located in front yard areas.The average building front yard setback on Willow St.is estimated to be approximately +4 feet. The average front yard setback on Navy St. is estimated to be approximately+17 feet. The applicant proposes to re-locate the barn with a front yard setback from Willow Street of 25 feet and the shed with a front yard setback of 39.6 feet, and a 15 foot side yard setback on this irregularly shaped lot. The subject structures have valid pre-existing CO's, and the applicant's project must have the approval of the Town Landmark Preservation Committee. 2. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(2),The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The applicant's property is located between two streets, creating two front yards and the parcel has no conforming rear yard area.Therefore,the re-location of the two pre- existing accessory buildings to any other on-site location requires the granting of variances. 3. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial,representing 100% relief from the code for the accessory structures proposed front yard locations, instead of code required rear yards locations. However, this is mitigated by the fact that these two structures already exist in non-conforming front yards because this property has two front yards and no rear yard location in which to move the structures, and also because of the pre-existing non-conforming status of these two structures each with a valid CO. 4. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. 5. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(Q. The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel in 2005, after the Zoning Code was in effect, and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6. Town Law $267-b. Grant of the variances is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of moving two pre-existing, non-conforming accessory structures to new non- conforming locations, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B,motion was offered by Member Homing, seconded by Member Goehringer,and duly, carried,to GRANT,the variance for the shed as applied for and shown on the survey drawn by Peconic Surveyors,P.C. dated Dec. 12.2012, and the site plan A.1 drawn by Gary R. O'Connor,dated Oct. 18,2013,and Page 3 of 3 April 17,2014 ZBA#6729—Bertault SCTM#1000-26-1-122 DENY,the variance request for the barn as applied and, GRANT ALTERNATIVE RELIEF, for a 25 foot setback from Willow Street for the accessory barn relocation,as proposed by the applicant in a letter dated March 13,2014, subject to the following condition; CONDITION: 1. The granting of the variances are contingent upon the applicant securing the approval by the Town Landmark Preservation Committee for the proposed project, if the application is denied by the Landmark Preservation Committee then this decision shall become null and void. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Byre applying for a building permit,the applicant or agent must submit to the Board ofAppeals for approval and f ling, two sets of the final site plan or survey conforming to the alternative relief granted herein. The ZBA will forward one set of approved,stamped drawings to the Building Department.Failure to follow.this procedure may result in the delay or denial of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board ofAppeals. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board ofAppeals. Any deviation from the variance(s)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board- Ayes:Members Weisman (Chairperson), Schneider, Horning Goehringer, Dantes. This Resolution was duly adopted(5-0). Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing /al /2014 n gpp-,C- 14&-k4,e,,G La�f� 400 LAO r2, {z,,u, -r I w +��, 0-46 V � X rls�5 P� 0g � � 1 {2 r to (�, ,'1 194 r6, C S -� -�lav S�/ C71-1 (,U l C.GGI� P l� -Y'2s G K-eal' StuK � — 1 ,43 C9U�S 1-2 S," �- .nom,, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD HISTORIC PRESERVATION APPLICATION Meetings are on the third Tuesday of the month at 3:00 pm in Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, NY. All applications must have a representative at the hearing in order to be re- viewed. Questions? Call Historic Preservation Commission (631)'765-1800. Date: Property Address: _ y Owners Name: - Sections of local laws authorizing review by the Historic Preservation Commis- sion of proposed work on designated town landmark properties are in Chapter 56 of the Southold Town Code. Categories of Proposed Work ❑ Repair ❑ Storm Windows & Doors RrACC9155*i bUgAFJCv FAK*L ❑ Alteration ❑ Additions & other ❑ Painting new construction ❑ Roofing ❑ Signs Please attach a detailed description of the proposed work to the application. At the earliest stage of planning of the proposed work, the applicant should contact the Chairman or Secretary of the Commission in order to establish a dialogue of the proposed work. I understand and agree that no work on this request shall commence until written appro al has been give y the Building Inspector if a Building Permit is required. Owne 's Signature: Note: Applicants should review Commission Standards before planning work to insure that the application conforms to these requirements. J 1. APPLICANT Name: �. h',Y K. 4711 , A1 Address: 9o2 • UNiox sT l.AMfti�rrviuz 0LG3© Telephon elemail/fax: . C-29 , 3104 .3635 o to .�t�c�t rtit�fC� �r jueT 2. PROPERTY Owner's Name: Mtn. Ill W ftK- U Address: � NAVy Telephone/e-mail/fax: 17- GO. C.� y RT�►uL�'� y�kiN�. X1/1 Tax Map Number. Date Acquired by Current Owner: Status: Local Landmark () In'Local'Landmark District () On National Historic Register or in NHR Dist. () Use: Current: Proposed: �►� L,ypu« 3. PROPOSED WORK Scope of Work: , AZ -r1oN of ANITIN& J/IrRdV ' Reason for Work: AVILLakJ MEWl G A Architect/Engineer: j6�;1uvzs,,]n_Contractor: Construction Schedule: 7 FOR LPC USE ONLY I have reviewed the enclosed application and determined the following action to be taken: Exempt Administrative Permit Required Public Hearing Required igned Date I� James Grathwohl,Chairperson �O��gL1fF0��.C�G Town Hall Annex y Donald Feiler ao 54375 Route 25 James Garretson,Vice Chair 1'O Box 1179 Anne Surchin O� i Southold,NY 11971 Gary Parker '�I,pl �d�' Fax(631)765-9502 Robert Harper Telephone:(631)765-1802 Edward Webb www.southoldtownny.gov Damon Rallis,Administrative Assistant Town of Southold Landmark Preservation Commission lU Agenda 3:00 p.m.,June 17,2014 Town Hall Annex Executive Board Room I. Call to Order:3:00 p.m. H. Approval of Minutes:May 20,2014(Attached to hardcopy agenda) III. Chairman's Comments IV. 3:30 PM Public Hearing-Bertault(Gary O'Connor,Architect):Proposed relocation of existing historic barn/garage at 95 Navy Street,Orient. Suffolk County Tax Map# 1000-26- 1-12.2. V. Old Business • Ben Franklin mile marker restoration plan.(Chairman Grathwohl) • Southold Town's 375"'anniversary celebration.(Chairman Grathwohl) • Joint corridor project with the Riverhead LPC. (Dam`on,Rallis,Administrative Assistant). VI. New Business �r • East End Lighthouses(Ted Webb) • New Suffolk Waterfront Fund Project.(Chairman Grathwohl) • Any new business commissioners wish to discuss. Next Meeting: Tuesday,July 15, 2014 at 3 p.m. in the Town Hall Annex j June 17,2014 1 Mr.James Grathwohl,Chair and Members of the Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commission Southold,NY 11971 Re: Commission review of proposed barn relocation on the Bertault property located at 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY 11957 Dear Chair and Board Members: As individuals interested in the preservation of the Historic Orient Village,we the undersigned are opposed to the relocation of the barn on the properly of Vincent Bertault located at 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY for the following reasons: 1. The historical and cultural foundations of Orient should be preserved as a living part of our community. 2. The relationship of the barn to the principle residence has existed since the late 1800's.Relocation of the barn would destroy this historic relationship, and its unique character and design,which is not duplicated anywhere else in the Historic Village of Orient. 3. The preservation of this irreplaceable heritage,in its current location,is in the public interest so that its vital legacy of cultural, educational, aesthetic and inspirational benefits will be maintained and enriched for future generations. 4. Relocating the barn will require extensive relocation and removal of historic landscaping. 5. The appearance of the original neighborhood will be damaged by the relocation of the barn,one of its integral elements. 6. Relocation of the barn does not comply with the intent of The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 which states that"The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided." We respectively request that the Commission deny Mr.Bertault's application to relocate the barn and not grant a Certificate of Appropriateness. Sincerely, See Attached list of signees Office Location: *pF SO(/j�olo Mailing Address: Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank 53095 Main Road 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 ® e Southold,NY 11971-0959 51 cou http://southoldtown.northfork-net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809 Fax(631)765-9064 vko(60 All ` March 13,2014 Landmark's Preservation Commission 25325 Main Road Cutchogue,New York 11935 Dear Mr. Grathwohl: We have received an application(ZBA#673 8)from Nancy Steelman for ASCH,Anthony, for construction of a screened porch addition. (tax map#1000-25-1-1) The proposed construction is not permitted without review and approval by the Southold Town Landmarks Preservation Commission,because the property is listed either on the Southold Town,New York State and/or the National Registers of Historic Places. Enclosed is a copy of the application. Your comments are requested. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman ZBA Chairperson By: __ Encls. FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD,N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: March 4, 2014 TO: Samuels and Steelman Architect(Asch) 25235 Main Road Cutchogue,NY 11935 Please take notice that your application dated February 18, 2014 For permit to construct a screened porch addition at Location of property: 290 Skipper's Lane, Orient,NY County Tax Map No. 1000- Section 25 Block 1 Lots 1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this non-conforming 13,416 square foot lot with two front yards in the Residential R-40 District is not Permitted pursuant to Article=II Section 280-124 which states that,on lots measuring'_less than 20,000 square feet in total size the minimum front yard setback is 35 feet and the maximum allowable lot coverage is 20%. Following the proposed construction,the dwelling will have a front yard setback of 14.8 feet from Skipper's Land 11.8 feet'from Oystg rponds Lane and a total lot coverage of 20.6%. Furthermore the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Section 170-8 of the Southold Town Code without Landmark Preservation Commission approval. t Authorized Signature Cc: File, ZBA, Landmark Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. Fee:S. Filed By: Assignment No. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS ; AREA'VARIA.NCE ' House No. 290 Street Skippers Lane Hamlet Orient SCTM 1000 Section 25 Block 01 Lots) 1 Lot Size .308AC Zone R-40 I(WE)APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR / n DATED 3/4/2 014 BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 2/13/2014 [ � I/ Applicants)/Owner(s).. Anthony Asch W Mailing Address: 5 Mt. Horeb Rd. Warren, NJ 07059 Telephone: 9 0 8-2 9 5-2 3 0 2Fax: Email: tony.asch@gmail.com NOTE:In addition to the above,please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agent, architect,builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative: Nancy Steelman for(:�)Owner( )Other: Address: 25235 Main Rd. Cutchogue, NY 11935 Telephone631-734-6405 Fax: Emafl: nancv@samuelsandsteelman.com Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to,from the above names: ( )Applicant/Owner(s), (4 Authorized Representative, ( )Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 2/13/2 014 and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 2/14/2 014FOR: ( Building Permit ( )Certificate of Occupancy ( )Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ( ) Change of Use ( )Permit for As-Built Construction O Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article,'Section,Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers.Do not quote the code.) Article: XXI I I Section: 2 8 0 Subsection: 124 Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: (:�q A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( )A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ( )Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ( )Reversal or Other A prior appeal( )has, Whas not been made at any time with respect to this property, UNDER Appeal No(s). Year(s). .(Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our officefor assistance) Name of Owner: ZBA File# REASONS FOR APPEAL (Please be specific,additional sheets maybe used with preparer s signature notarized): 1.An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted,because: See Attached 2.The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue,other than an area variance,because: See Attached �v 3.The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: See Attached 4.The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: See Attached 5.Has the alleged difficulty been self created? M Yes,or{}No Why: Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land? {*No {}Yes(please furnish a copy) This is the NUNUVIL M that is necessary and adequate,and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. d 4/ , Z.Z ' S' Ar6-ofit li t or Authorized Agent Agent must subritten Authorization from Owner) Sworn to befo a me this ay Of JqA 204_. J Rolgy Public PATRICIA RICHARDS [T'IRY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK NO.DISIB042467 CMLIFiED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY COML41SSION EXPIRES MAY 30,20 IT Asch Residence REASONS FOR APPEAL 1. An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because the proposed addition is characteristic of other residential properties in the neighborhood in scale, design and setbacks to the street. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, othgr than the area variance, because property is on a corner lot and the most of house is located within the 35' front yard setback.A variance would be required for any proposed addition. O� 3. The amount of relief requested is not substantial because the proposed porch addition will be constructed to match the existing porch details and dimensions so that it will respect both the existing house and the historic neighborhood. 4. The variance will NOT have an adverse effector impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because the proposed construction will retain all water on site via new dryweils and comply with all best management practices for storm water run off during construction. 5. The alleged difficulty has NOT been self created because it is the result of a pre- existing situation where the existing house was located within the setback prior to zoning. Prepared b Date 11 APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: Anthony Asch DATE PREPARED: March 4, 2014 1.For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: Existing deck II.New Construction Areas(New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: 10 'w x 3 6' 6"L Dimensions of new second floor: NA Dimensions of floor above second level: NA Height(from finished ground to top of ridge): 111-101, Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed?If yes,please provide height(above ground)measured from natural existing grade to first floor: no HL Proposed Construction Description(Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary).Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: Two story residence with Screen porch, one story wing and wood deck Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: Two story residence with screen porch and screen porch extension, one story wing and new outdoor shower. IV.Calculations of building areas and lot coverage(from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: 2 543 S.F. Proposed increase of building coverage: 227S.F. Square footage of your lot: 13,416 S.F. Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: 20-6-'. V.Purpose of New Construction: New porch addition VI.Please describe the land contours(flat,slope%,heavily wooded,marsh area,etc.)on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): Land contours are flat - does not relate to difficulty meeting code requirement Please submit g sets of photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction,and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes X No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? X No Yes please explain on attached sheet. C. l.)Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? no 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? NA 3.)Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? no 4.)If your property contains wetlands or pond areas,have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? NA Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: and if issued,please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. ` D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? No E. Are there any patios,concrete barriers,bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting? no Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any constructioA,taking place at this time concerning your premises? no If yes,please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If anyare lacking;please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them onto obtain an?mended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? no If yes,please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. I. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel single family residence and the proposed use same with porch Pxt--Pn.qi on (ex:existing single family,proposedrsamewith garage,pool or other) �l 4thonzed s' a a$d Date MV '�.A"§a�"� f't•Lp"'S ..7�4 sy�F'Tl �r€*. t-. ^:.,x��srr �f is6"rkZ� } � , .�wp 4•,`��="•� t�xy�'is2te '�dli r�+ '� �^c w r+k� :: bj a, ,4�Kty.S'jM1 ?I�°aM1o,'a+.✓'.,tiy Farr kd sq ffiVF g acc. 4i tt N j1.. c°.r., aF5 r > c cA ' $'F i+. rj,ss�S` 'S �" " "'f'��� aCs'J�F.' k � `o§-�a� c r •.cxr`^a �� ` 7tY !s 7y r �t � Y4' v.f`*<`�°�. 7• $` �r..3«, ... 'S.Sad....st.Y f 'f4 �+ @ 's! t�.. !rSh...;�. .at,,cxs t• t' k, s L k .3 h r°. 9 • 'i an.'Y�r°s, t S s �p�; s „�y`$ s• 5k' � ! i$', .-# iL .,rte o'a .+,` "w y'• ter' r t , •, ` ., -�" a c.,E pm� -sem } '�S�q�•�r+��� '�r '�`'�a"� �r,.i 'trW���ye'tC rtitl • x x x A �r ' ". § ,•«.. '"."`""",�„:z`..,"' ,�' a s a { 0A, ld `'+s.' +a. flays � ..<•�a' �`^s k�-9. r a v i R s ­UA ,✓ -'� "x r T,S`#r+ vA`,a'k'�i'�"fJ f $ <>.'# sy`a s t ,p. k r+r,,� ern `TMip 'xl• - .ass ""sY�"�t`' " a%' ,+n# ,,� F'd,zsn sn d'�`r-4~.+� a.rr .nzs- x" P a�fa S° ��� # T a F ark 5� 'S, Z �• � 4`.F � � x5y�,xaT. ..a�.ts`- § r 4 wwA� as r t r '{ 'a" s �' � !t x.z 'x•T .wa.•�� ssa`.x` .t: 1 s �srk*F'4• a �'�i .gmt$ i,,..: ` �u .°�' ,`s- �,g;� Ilk Arf r ��'.�y y� � t mom+• � �.. �tj;, ��'`.'x '., "�` c�£ ,.:�.nF°� 'k. �nT�t�'+C�t` rvag-k.� uirbl!«. �e3.�R'F>'.. . *R9^a�.a_ wLe ..aE...i..'e� Fµ •.��f�� •�' 'U' xr "sl r � bt cy� �t rhe 'th---c RIT r ^.c'to s - "d£ Sa P+i f t a j ..4 r„s f'tw �.,.,r� .as rer t4 Xr � �% T� a ..itea `��g -t5nmw cai:. ^rvt;tom 1 Ls5At 1 f c3 $ *r a �tor`.YL'#. }fix" � }}� yb�` 'eC^ .� .'4Q. ili 1 :1.,q ' ,",tac .crw�,w a (v i-_s�'LY ! a *3.vt l,�F` r `��' i 4, a` 'k,.,s'p ? 1 rte" r xQ""r zw Z d xzz p -� is°a Ell, ' ,� a I x r��{iEF` ` SN#�#y•c `4 s�#iR^J�S �'' `Rt,. Sia V a snncar»,�r��an.2answ�tta°2 m,+s'at. n ��,: �}} S^�`, S�'ffi8' YOYMX Fa'linYtF++ �.F ST -Gscaa.3s �eiw'irn�°>� R? }7a��y�,� a, "6 ��osluds°a(" }, 01d ht`3 Y,' ; 's 5�1°•' ` 7"' �i 41X - a`s"�a'ysxtx#� a3 •' # i }n: ` y i s a '++zant 4 s Y'��' k �r�'9-�`�,�.wrisxr" .T'��4 a-� � � � �f••��s55P„„�•e•..e�. 1. ,W?"4 g rry'+ ���w ar { f cttr '��� vej 7 .' .$ �iF; •�."�`.�9h. �s ��n� , € $r k' Y " aux,,..', LP.ssSa.£3 avT.'aa+'at. ✓ �'�a" a:'s r " rte` r I'4c+`a�aa`.�y`.7" '+`Cad f0. -,r .�"�s y y� T;x � 9 �_ �'•rc*xt ,�br+ x Y� " ^t � } � ,��r �`yd, l�a `d.+t"�1/+F' M1y. 4xd „" R+ k " r tf ,� J ,' 1 r Sia.'V Vit, '✓` � ,�,}* � ,., r•-.. r � .R �*�rs�w�faY y��it .s�s��ri1��. ,?V. � f i r r `�a✓.y. }L 3..ss n� 1 c "w J Aa g „C -a'r } Y.:� 9,hM jM.,,'YYt �a4T 4 ,<M1 • ,fit rN 4 vy�i{ '�+.Sf'. M .Fj SA i�✓ I'"{� r} .A > .. .�""'�,. �ZC.•+,. 'tN. a E - fi �Ta. .. � at" '"'`.,.,, ''x" r Aye. mob" AST y_ ' s " ! v `oto, h,.s'z'4x .'k#..- 2§t* y��' h,,.,'rr� s�r°�+r' : =51552 a.r^ L "�,ai'" c s.`s` 3'�-ua.��. ae'f'' `'`*"'.iX°:✓^ �* vis�'Sa. �'�` �,.g ",.".S"..�+' '3� �.,,� �Y• X.."' as ` y'v�,„ ��� r to �" w t z�» �F�a �a j ^' ��• ta"`� >'` 'r Y4 � ��4�`4��5"' Z�`$�..»hpa'_N�� ✓d.>- F.1.4,����� �� Y.S'^-."9 ��� �K�Z setry, �p o €^?' �,.A�"��'f `3tst°6S�'� w+�u.�i £."``szk�"'��s5asS�z�.fi,��;s�^a,:y'` -z,�•`ss�-:� „�S' ��+'� �3+ary,_g.s".:.��"s.,-�.>Q., "'" ,n;?".`^��;t: f-1 Gary R O'Connor FROP05ED BUILDING RELOCATION 102N=1ARCHITECT(1` 102 Orh M. lea IambpnWle,NJ 08530 xru•caDss+ for the ?I_ le 6093973635 13ERTAULT RESIDENCE PROJECT DATA tM 1AV 101DJ01601122 LOf/CIL01/RR45 95 NAVY 5TREET,ORIENT, NY 1 1957D 9VODM5'0x.W I,N0 w.110-0 LRPAS O i1C( A R19 2005 A5 NY AO IIixS ADDY! 95-51MT ADDREVIATION5 ARCHITECTURAL LEGEND B oa"I Nr"9,7 AREA= 19,905 .SQ FT CL Et 10-1 D[itaC1 KIO lfy,M 11101 Do611M Rl5ilN6 tYALL ro RWNN a 7 SRCut Ht1L`9 M[.I%-- ( NCi N p I n P x21YWALL CLEL p FDFCRr'PICCMED E%rsLLYINK6/LC4°I'-I VZOf AB Mc•afb[ r erMt N¢pt Nurt+�<Yl~' ,r� '�t�jy dei(�lfnl __-------- a5' IPQAI PJ:I r436103CCC:drl 9l+i_OOv fB0 P, Yd N, Jan Rr a _--------- O[9iiND lYNLLO RCMIN[° S>uWIMCW4 f0 D[SCPJrt10110P USC G�5111K.IL\°rx culGl�,E/ /'�. `CarVn< WILLOW ] K]eY wNs3t[ in9510RYfIfJn[MfWnC nNHlSttJS'J..p°A CStU l�C (( P'w'ct N La✓u EYfn'+�e `/' SInUCNI¢5 wC A DAMAL'K r IKOR°IIY SinJRILtY Lb51u0rLCt5'LMISS10iY ti•J.Y� {1 I Nn A4v�e P.Y FN '1'Yq„c: R A x- �arora'>Yr N AJnnua 1FA°[AR'YS fP.4VC QJLV IAO I Si0a1'Du\V:V'41 Nle^ " 5 l• EL II rryr Ir Pq •65 93• u r X rmlxM[m•xdur 4A1P fX M 5f4 tlr SAIe41 N Mtv R FeSnV: --- CCm[RUNC N852 _K� EIB's k PROPJS[O Int KC[5`OPYIWJ140v1KDr5f�•05[0 Nw:u<on ,AP&Ai �� B r0 Bt 0.(POYIIW(D OJ inf FROP[Eq AY SnUIM PLa IN'e° fnl.'S rLe nue 4VeM N N+'°< UU o:gmin qq%���p5,pp''I to PKC OI N—ral to SIfLG1UgC al'AVFitAOE BCDD..Sf.�/LNEI a 2' S� S� KnKVA4 oPIRYf[pAmLLOA$II[Cl `^°tEtPSy' 1r i�el vu1 �"."'.S ...nb• T—� ON MLLON 51REEn¢tulre f• Q $L �_ A. nrn+, m.rexa; xrC N,.aA 22, Rrt Mwe. 10WY t9•MtD r�•, (Y, ZONING COMPUTATIONS 1np k�` r y o m S (ia(en dour aEwTr, J Aff v'scSt fba• bh r1 <{n O DOORSYMBOL m¢'io A•NN�e —20 III 1 O RCW raO W911x0 WJ)PCStD B' v f nA N Ylo+s yyWee5 ((ns'nnr o /. r N IOT UO,Kew 15 �+J fx Wcs �:Rtr xii✓a1 5�0 SI�N- O t'nu0"V 5NE10. 9tmrt lK[ �x� t SWN4 5nr',P--,I,dIAne - s �rl •[ ilmn s 11 WI 114 <O�Sf N rux LOimtn 00, 1109:tl57 ai N1n;CW1A•;Y_ '.0 0 (,c 04 eM f0i1°AN3L.5600E5. 53 uONE • o Z M FRA EL a 9T sTcfNAOE R i Ot MCPA[ww 16 AULVLII"Alt K6iV0+5 F�;[7y QaL [NAnW-F— V g d-KC ]•PINt 5 M ME A 1 ePi" Py'a �'BIRCH 10• 90.1N[E nM 6 [7 O FE o/L Iml,rnPA r`AIR'D P'0_I vG P'CSfCO. h 9 el N ee ryv' � 4..Nl[+CVAIION WCg,,c, O v l� YU:Ym yx 15 riE FOC��.+G[ p C 9EILlid'°i LBr W�teJ rOf41_IDC YMAS 35 Sa91 IOCn4Lt COaGLif Cnlnue l r� A Fia�1+'E I / '� 10•IRE L 44%tG11i •RJi5 J1Y 2'3312.'W W[`lKC 157.7, loc C amym • IJ A•11 Wh5V f100R AL'. u"•�+PP'•,'1n /s��'� seerlev PtrtYtA'(x r'''`1I�) B'E4ERDPE[N e'er "[ t�„ 0 950 DF Is'c:.P Ao a.L! Pi �K 136 100 A •`l.- ,• f^ NIY CUY[W([ JtN, 1112w AU CY.NG li' < f wy FiAI ds,ca OlIe.7e DRM RLRKAf2 50�1BEAO(�iPEE / (175 ��r<; eBiEE r i Lot 2 1 yl SNED A+L soar6Ylcncmxm.N rAannuw�.t1•[ms LIT E r 6:ry: + ° Dm< =.J t ofd is°, u°uR D wsnyD PPEr[J5[D 4 w.eba n9B A %1( I(ReN obd�w,y u morowwla r trmEE ,\( Pf F+ >rass Lot tL_ �ir'm PL¢rAPn z°a dd 9E Aoc°.•G. maw TRCC roic �(� 10]7 .•/6' V"f Mcm 11 1tl]Sn 5S:115's'15Tr A7rr .w. ,cn A nnaye. I �.x "q>1 ter P1V0'I<DORRIIOOlrLO 8'IRCC[ Ex51m[0 ul 105 tOO j NAY M2A ([OY IM3Y \OinA.lV „ona lal PPL�'Atlp•�e0 M1;r 1 WE: GiEEN E I[n srr efK"a Pw<x (f��__ q� pr�.,n �0, 15'e �r� ��--••�� iPANE V,1 iB[i ' ehrA t°^' H A'.•y pt I, PTC y� %R C , OQ i` BAIW mi a SHEET INDEX GPY FLR EL 6 1'J NN fl a T Joty � WE CDnC POPOuS(NVDvxrR Y POND IY 6_-,� R 5nlr DLSCNRiOY }} L___� CI�YJ x<�ie t D Q b.e An.y i``rPP4r LImeu4[oOun ncb N dalinHed Pn U ® 2a•CrED0AR9 CO * MWITS F%3E0r0,Atp mBiddy ade COxwD 00111,11AF0155 C lull IIpj�N�r •x HVtI {m`:m:s �' &9�w"+a�w"` I �:pAre tAxr,r COxp[R innC( m�Nl L+J Fl .2 LOCM101111ADTOW PPf91 vpYvluna7�pier•ppure y ® ✓ N LOa• .r,•FRONT YARD 5 T BACk I 13 PNN51 CICVAh014 U �1 ounu^ ; x �`16,R Pi a�in Oe a• VOt r„ O w1 - TTW. Iq[E 1 Ij((p9p9M1Y((�•'' lu> i3-v n' �' PSP �,i6_-. nwo wsu ewa vooD '7 V ' UTtit ( I �w �•9 A ov°t FFE Vew$1,: G o I 10NsTY_js � V °r a,Dt'ue rrtY.. & [[ €' ..y 7' HSE _ �rt13'TNEE �• ...�.e, ar,l.o�rs wp+t RRsl ^+ SEATO I u.w LIMP! t L 0 p.<j w/,d�� ^�, .� 19•SPROCEJ 1RtA4E ^ C7 Olx NAW SIPEEt a.wc AN/,71:.r L �g B� d ® 'NIAOE BIDO-5�9�C�1 avrv. a [u• 51 IN�wv ecuwv �o Puh 1i 1^�A +d' Uo• FtNbirnY $CIP 1avfonae � J H 5 ®tt T~ 166' �(f MEL•B S1 FE OA- PA'4DH5Y, {tC5 7[</t<.l MIP"d H8 @a'�eJ D4>.`9 v�b r I--� 9C� 'C'y 126 23' \1 x68' �POR�pEO 22'1PEE 19'iA€E I tt`JP�✓nii rta.tt�Do / (} r xA pr�n .RI 't1 rw aoc0 >J % 'K CeiF' PPFW Qo( 1 wE�sl�v aa:<n[v.rm+ 4-° �GAt uET Et a fi 11' •85 71' av: ilo°K.uwr• P 11,i1ry 582.49'40"W 586'18'20W w.7v1c` u,.s ti<,„. x+i.<n vixrd v.wanrc N<h CL EL BATT wslz 17 86 s a 4 P12o705;0 BUILDING RELOC•ATI N YD Yae REL STREET 9CATAU�f[C"OCKt a tr 551 N51R1[I ® NAVY I'me GPI[NI IY,195) "f4 p[rxoDD 14 FS0ACNf1SNIRMMe4mv MDATA v v>Y Mullet"pPOJCR OAtt/SBCPW'! PCCOYC$LRlEY0R5 P C .,.j It30r5n 1tG_L. .Y,o �� $OUInOW 01D"NY I 1971 w¢o c[aNe54Iz,Eo1z — 51TE FM5ou In6•1 It, Garet R.O'Connor P>,'��'� ��� # a, R^q•. W��< s '�° `o.�, kr"cIII"l.K:r tt:. N19:ti 4034-dfe: ,:�,��.'��n a ate" °�•� ;�`0 a 7 ':�: /i ,�.�' �Y�"', �,� � f �'°,y u�;�^s✓q k;?F�ay� <,'�",' �grr, DARn/GARRIAGE HSE.ria DA>'.N(CARRIAGE Y15E.#4 VIEW OF PR0P05ED 5A.RN LOCATION FROM WILLOW 51 Vf4NOF PR0P05ED BARN LOCATION DARN!CARRIAGE t15�: d2 s � �' � •t�t��� ,� ,,, �: FROM VACENI'51RCIT� OAT MV DARN!CARRIAGE 115E #I FRONT VIEW OF BERTALJJ 5r4RN ` LOCATION/PHOTO NIAP INDICATING NEIGHDORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS AND PRECEDENCE OF DARN * CARRIAGE HOUSES r Gary R O'Connor Gx t— — — — uacniTECrr.LLC 101 NWN U—5t-t IwUrtn/c,NJ 08530 Nroro.css- Pborw r.09 397 3035 tOP RAIC 170K I i ARC5IRDON I ' I 1 5[mw tl[RIRO G j _ MWOUD N'R„'N-MAR QR EOUACTOGV95PAWM wslfte S[wCTURt3 nY GRLIIMURODR a STUCCO NRII IN EARfNrrn¢caoR EAST ELEVATION scae v..I o ............... r rrsan Roov le v 5 Orc?nATelz-0i _ __ — �scca+onnoReo�_.—.. GROUND F100R01f �-,rle�Ano�aar--'—•- - n5T ELEVATIONvrM TUE MOR xAre va'•ro BARN FLOOR PLAN :cat rrr-ro I _ I I I I 1 (E)D CHED Fl TFT SFi DD rRavt zGw r5 s_ _ ''• .�. axc-..�• ---rrnR ROOD it i I_r—— .. I I � u Yana Tornaelzoa• i i WEST ELEVATION •• -- ---•-- ® I I S[AU' Ll114-P.0 PL44[Ix9 r I I L__ ______J ec V�rWcii t`lvnC�iM euwixG nT v r:� 'o,u'i r•„a,rr.o.•°n; � C(WIIDPlCORO'O�'__ FLOOR PLAN ;, m sue rw'-ra .. rRo�oSw 9unniivc u[aanon _/ SS IAVY5riJ[I ONCNI,AT 115f l ____,flDUNOCy0.OR00-___ PLRNOU9 APRGNSINURORECUAL i0 -RIL'lArtq:001 q Ru�[RCv,.iVNI GRr5WW26Y—x =STRUMU3 WC arlw NORTH ELEVATION suuE Iw•..'v 5OUTFi ELEVATION SOUTIi ELEVATION 1 1 1 1 wA-3 114'•I.0' n f d tr' f I�I F f t. �- ..gym.• �� � µ 4r nV a� } , z M s , r -,a w Zvi x W� or � a, y ��v £ a u r' lug. #z„ s,. � r a r .. ., MAY } a� �.�e' ' ' � June 17,2014 Mr. James Grathwohl, Chair and c1Q� Members of the Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commission _ U Southold,NY 11971 Re: Commission review of proposed barn relocation on the Bertault property located at 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY 11957 Dear Chair and Board Members: As individuals interested in the preservation of the Historic Orient Village,we the undersigned are opposed to the relocation of the barn on the property of Vincent Bertault located at 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY for the following reasons: 1. The historical and cultural foundations of Orient should be preserved as a living part of our community. 2. The relationship of the barn to the principle residence has existed since the late 1800's. Relocation of the barn would destroy this historic relationship, and its unique character and design,which is not duplicated anywhere else in the Historic Village of Orient. 3. The preservation of this irreplaceable heritage,in its current location,is in the public interest so that its vital legacy of cultural,educational, aesthetic and inspirational benefits will be maintained and enriched for future generations. 4. Relocating the barn will require extensive relocation and removal of historic landscaping. 5. The appearance of the original neighborhood will be damaged by the relocation of the barn,one of its integral elements. 6. Relocation of the barn does not comply with the intent of The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 which states that"The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved.The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided." We respectively request that the Commission deny Mr.Bertault's application to relocate the barn and not grant a Certificate of Appropriateness. Sincerely, See Attached list of signees We the undersigned OPPOSE the relocation of the barn on the Vincent Bertault property located at 95 Navy Street, Orient, NY and request that the Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commission NOT GRANT a Certificate of Appropriateness. Name Address r Signature ���o_.,._��w. --ESE�..� 20 v �e��► �—• �+�� �a-- LF'CkPqAtfA' 0,7q,3�Wj tj C4tj-oRI�hIr �,b/VAW 6 edy-,4� L�icr�l ,_f' � -q-; S G:00y: '017 Ao-5sc41 1,7eOL, I tj ssenj l a D DO aec, w , ski �n CI 5 9C4101-114 (�C) ~ o ;f N 0 Lry © kwJU Re4ef- &este 1 I 255 llnvY S*8s-, d cwt- 64 V bf i rn ` lj ' CA-4nr* Ma "V9 X+5 H-arbo r- d.. 6YU V ;, 8 I'll We the undersigned OPPOSE the relocation of the barn on the Vincent Bertault property located at 95 Navy Street, Orient, NY and request that the Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commission NOT GRANT a Certificate of Appropriateness. Name Address Signature Nvmz4 e o U —Z2.-LLS� IRV- 3� b <J WN AY U; l(rz e Laate 41 144 (,j4 ' wary P n o�/7Ld fly Ms I � AAc We the undersigned OPPOSE the relocation of the barn on the Vincent Bertault property located at 95 Navy Street, Orient, NY and request that the Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commission NOT GRANT a Certificate of Appropriateness. Name . Address Signature (;l 1 l ft ?S W01074 ST P, X-160 V,Ila C4 un eA) 6'j'/l001 Gl i sf 1 \/1)l A� L-r/LyLQ A Igo "AV y sr -44PI rj'2 .ow We the undersigned OPPOSE the relocation of the barn on the Vincent Bertault property located at 95 Navy Street;Orient, NY and request that the Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commission NOT GRANT a Certificate of Appropriateness. Name Address Signature 2d— 44671✓' (�%41' GC- -! ne, 111 47S" o -r s FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD,N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: October 15, 2013 RENEWED:January 24,2014 AMENDED: February 21, 2014 TO: Gary O'Connor,Architect(Bertault) 102 N.Union Street Lambertville,NJ, 08530 Please take notice that your application dated October 24, 2013 For permit for relocation of an existing barn and an existing shed at Location of property:95 Navy Street, Orient,NY County Tax Map No. 1000-Section 26 Block 1 Lot 12.2 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed relocation of two pre-existing accessory buildings on this non-conforming 19,905 square foot lot with two front yards is not permitted pursuant to Article III, Section 280-15 which states "In the Agricultural-Conservation District and Low-Density Residential R-80 R-120 R-200 and R-400 Districts, accessory buildings and structures or other accessory uses shall be located in the required rear ay rd" The proposed accessory structures although currently located in the front yard will be moved to another front yard location. In addition,the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Section 170-5 of the Southold Town Code. The proposed construction is subject to Landmark Preservation Commission approval. This Notice of Disapproval was amended to reflect the need for Southold Town Landmark Commission: approval. Z ---- ----- -----Q Jd ignature Cc:File,ZBA FORM NO. 3 Z / 6 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1 BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD,N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: October 15, 2013 RENEWED:January 24,2014 TO: Gary O'Connor,Architect(Bertault) 102 N.Union Street Lambertville,NJ,08530 Please take notice that your application dated October 24,2013 For permit for relocation of an existing barn and an existing shed at Location of property: 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY County Tax Map No. 1000-Section 26 Block 1 Lot 12.2 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed relocation of two pre-existing accessory buildings on this non-conforming 19,905 square foot lot with two front yards is not permitted pursuant to Article IIISection 280-15 which states "In the Agricultural-Conservation District and Low-Density Residential R-80 R-120 R-200 and R-400 Districts, accessory buildings and structures or other accessory uses shall be located in the required rear ard." The proposed accessory structures, although currently located in the front yard,will be moved to another front yard location. - - ------------ kS�igna - ori � Cc:File, ZBA i t April 15, 2014 Chair and Members of the Southold Town Landmarks Preservation Commission JAI Southold,NY 11971 Re: Commission review of proposed building relocation for the Bertault Residence, 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY 11957 Dear Chair and Board Members: Please accept these written comments into the record in the above referenced matter. I am William Gesell and I own the property, on 20 Vincent St, which adjoins the north east corner of the Bertault property. The common property line is 104.45 feet. My sister- in- law Sonia Gesell owns the property to the east of the Bertault property and has a common property line of 154.15 feet. My sister in law planned to be here today but unfortunately could not attend due to the death of her mother. Sonia is in agreement with comments made below. Orient has a rich history with many lovely and unique historic structures. Recognizing the importance of maintaining Orients unique and historical character for future generations, the Board of Directors of the Oysterponds Historical Society, in 1973, set out to inventory the historic structures in the Village of Orient and to have the district registered with the Department of-Interior under the National Historic Prevention Act of 1966. This work was completed May 21, 1973 , when the Orient Historical District was established and placed;on the National Register of Historical Places. A booklet entitled"Historic Orient Village"published by the Oysterponds Historical Society provides a list of historic structures in the district. The introduction to this booklet states that"For the purposes of the official Historic District an old building was defined as any structure-including monuments, a cemetery, a wharf and even atree-in existence before 1900 and now standing within the boundaries of the District." The structures located on the property owned by Mr. Bertault, my sister-in-law and me are all listed as being part of the Orient Historical District. Mr. Bertault proposes to relocate (defined as "removal" by code) a 10'x18' shed located immediately behind the main residence on Navy Street and a"barn" which is currently visible from Navy Street. It should be noted that the "barn" appears to be two structures that were joined together in the early 1900s. The first section is 22.6'x 25.8' and faces Navy Street. This section appears to be a carriage house which was more than likely build before 1900 as part of the original property development. A 12.5'x 23' extension was added to the back side of the carriage house likely in the early 1900s Sonia and I have no objection to the relocation of the "shed" but do object to the relocation of the "barn" for the following reasons. 1. The fagade, symmetry and character of the Bertault property, as viewed from Navy Street, will be changed from the unique architectural and historic perspective which has existed for over 100 years. 2. Keeping the "barn" in its current location is important to preserve the history and character of Orient Village. 3. The "barn" (carriage house) in its relationship to the historic primary residence on Navy Street, is of such historic interest that its relocation would be to the detriment of the community. 4. Relocating "barn" will require removal of the historic Willow Tree for which Willow Street is named.Note, as referenced above, that even trees are considered a structure and part of Orient Historic District. 5. Other existing trees and shrubs will be removed or relocated. The relocation of the two Holly Trees which have been in place since early 1900s is "risky because you lose the majority of the feeder roots", per Sandy Feather of the Penn State Extension. 6. Placing the "barn" on the proposed location on Willow Street will be out of size and scale and adversely impact adjoining properties. For example my front property line will now face the side of a 48.4' "barn"rather than the existing park like view. 7. Property values on Vincent and Willow Streets will likely be adversel��*O� impacted. As a final point the relocation of the "barn" is unnecessary in order for Mr. Bertault to achieve the objectives he mentioned to Zoning Board of Appeals in March 2014. The "barn" in its existing location can be used as a garage and storage area for boat equipment using access to Navy Street. A pervious driveway and/or sanitary covers over the existing septic-system make this access possible. Also existing drainage can be improved to prevent water damage to"barn" and foundation. It is respectively requested that the Commission deny Mr. Bertault's request to relocate the "barn" and not grant a Certificate of Appropriateness. Sincerely, William Gesell 20 Vincent St. Orient, NY 11957 AUw xIF �. to 16. ov- u AREA= 19,905 ,SQ.FT. N SURVEY OF PROPERTY AT ORIENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. 1000-26-01-122 SCALE.- .1' 30' DECEMBER 12, 2012 APRIL 25, 2013 (LOCATED WALL) CL.EL. 4,7 C 4.5' , S TREET WILLOW - N85 28'30"E 65.93 EL.4• 2' — 5 LOCUST 4- TREE o N/0/F JOANN T. & cR R 10 CHERR H. GESELL ' N - 18" HOLLY I Lo 16" HOLL MO.2'W. I N89'56'00"E 54.53' MON.O.2'N 7- EL4.9' STOCKADE FE. 0.4'E. 4 711'N7 10•� L.6.6' 20"TREE • {V 15"WHITE BIRCH � FE,O L. N O Lot 02 ,p. V. . 10"TR 4a 50" BEACH TREE N (DO O • 12.5 � nSHED e"TREEWALL8 EVERGREEN 1.1'W o Z 12"TREE 5.0 Lot O 010.7 + 8 11'EVERGREEN ,"TREE 11/2 STY. 4 6" TREES - BARN (F1 R.EL.6.1)• D M.M.POND 6' o G7 36 � 24" CEDAR 'a (n , 10.4 Im- 5. �NC.WALL 1— mxm 4 tn0u' ml R V c 130 �4, UTi L.ROOM 4"TREE I. O / 10.1 i 5. WALL N 1ST' 13"TREE I j o.7'W7' 4 V HSE N _ 0 6. I 11-SPRUCE 14. 2 STORY FRAME SEPTIC Q -! HOUSp6.5') FE.O/L ' �F•Fl.R.EL 23' 16.6 2B 8' PORC FI) 201REE 19'TREE Sim `V 126. Plc �;• 11• . 85.71' ELS.s' S82049 40'W S86'18 20 W 17.86 CLEL STYE 5.4' NAVY •CL.EL• E 1 , 1 Bldg Dept copY'from ZBA Final reviewed documents ZBA File# Date: MONUMENT - ELEVA77ONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.A.V.D. Lot; ®•'s refer to "SUBDIVISION MAP FOR JOHN H.-WOODHOUSE ro��� p!}ET� r & JERILYN B. 'WOODHOUSE" FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE ON APRIL 19, 2005 AS FILE No.11245 �� A,, NOTE: PROPERTY LOCATED"ENTIRELY IN AE6 ZONE tLE FROM FIRM. No. 36163CO068H 9/25/2009• 9 �p.1-�� _ cam. 49618 • ANY ALTERA770N OR A�I770N TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLA77ON �� ,n IVO.403 IC SURVEYORS, "P.C OF SECTION 72090F 7JHE NEW.YORK STA TE'EDUCA 77ON LAW. a�;ANAD 1) 765-5020 FAX (631) 765-1797 EXCEPT AS PER SEC770N 7209-SUBDIVISION 2. ALL CER77FICA77ONS HEREON ARE VALID FOR THIS MAP AND COPIES THEREOF ONLY IF P.O. BOX 909 SAID MAP OR COPIES BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR 1230 TRAVELER STREET 12-t�ryn .WHOSE.SIGNA7URE APPEARS HEREON. SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971• �G /c7 Gary K. O'Connor ARCHITECT,LLC PROPOSED BUILDING RELOCATION 102 North Union 5treet EA i1;•' t LsmbertwIle,NJ 08530 °per N4 tl d2oy54: for the Phone 609 397 363 / BERTAULT RESIDENCE PROJECT DATA TAX3(AP ID,IWPZ&01MAP DI IDTc 2(LOT a REFERS TO 95 NAVY STREET, ORIENT, NY 11957 APRIL 19. MAP IILLD INSUFFOIK CO CLERK'S OFFICE APRIL-19.2005 AS FlES NO 11295 ADDRESS, 95 NAVY STREET ORILVT,NY I L957 ZONING DISTRICT, R{0,RFS1DENTIALLOWDENSTTYAA ABBREVIATIONS ARCHITECTURAL LEGEND 6 I PROPESPECIARTY TIRE I PROPERTY LOCATED ENTIRELY IN AF6 FLOOD HAZARD ZONE AI1?EA— 19.905 ,SQ FT CL EL I FROM FIRM Nv 36103CWH 9/25/2W9 EKISTINO WAILTO REMAIN 4 7' CLE,- ��7-[--�'''���lll •�)y7 DFSCRIRANIED ELUN'WTHI PRINCIPAL BUILDING ONST35ATWO A p MG hkmha RFH Rav(Ha,r� - -` - NEW WALL T 4 S• L'-`1'/ LJ PET S I OWULKALNMUCIURENEXR'I71.GACCk3'_ORYlS5fOKYHFAAME MBR. Mall Cb- REL RcOm(cd)I—)(vr) T (�, T{ 1 11 11 PJ 1 BARN AND I STORY FRAME SHED AB Aadwr Bvlt F Fah-hk NECH bfewnm(a0 RH Rkt.Hand --------__ EXISITNGWAU.TOREMOVEDI✓ I SIMILAR OR EQUAL TO AC Amw.. H. Fum abT MED Mcdlum RM Aavm -------- 5� 5� I I ✓ P A.C. Asp6dR.Cunacm Olen MLMB Mcmbrm. AO Rough O��++��nnmg GRASSPAVE2 BY INVISIBLE PROPOSED THEACCFSSORY MAN AND SHED IS PROPOSEDTO Aro N Candl¢IvN„g TDRK Flnb,tek MET Mesal R/W Righ[efWr� _---- DATU\/EWE ',d 7 I STRUCTURES,INC ➢E REPOBmOhED ON THE PROPERTYAS 6HOWA FORVEHICULAR AD A-Dmin FD H°or Ddm MFR MavuT"amrt ILWL Rain W'o Lrrler V IY ` LM0.Y FROM WILLOW STItFLT ADI AdJuu,ble FUN. Fou¢dNun MK M®hole Rlkk Rcmvrcfi Rep:aa AL3GR FE I.Eai hI, MHN M'imw. PRGPERTI-IJNE _ AL wamm'°"uan EGL Fltx,giav MIA Mi- s G t;5 a3 1, 5"LOC ST X_ ELS RELOCATE IB'HOLLY ALT Al- PH Fla Hon MISC. MumBanmw --- CENTER ME N85"2 .� ! vyz+ FE1 AMP Ampe r IJ b1S R.,Head M.ml MLD M..I&, SAA SupvITA1,Reei- ANOD Amdlad B.- MOV Monblc SG Svlld Cvm ��, 4 2 I " `�1 N O m9 1 6 APA Aprv¢ FH WS R.HodWvd MRB M'blr SGD. Snt Cavo Di P. DIMENSION TG FACE OF 41' AVERAGE BLDG SEII3AC L r� TREE,q;m5 APPROX Avpmdmam Sm'" MT. M-'(.a SSD Sd®u'r STRUCTURE ON MLLOW STREET I ARCH Anhhax FIN 'iv,ua(ed) MTL Mnm41 S I Smm Dmm ON I , A A a O" ASP" Arp6c4 FIX. F¢d MUL M°Wvv SECT, S.- RELOCATE 16'HOLLY ZrA o ZONING COMPUTATIONS ASTM A-S-&,TMIm FL Aver Nf\LK Mdboh SH. Sbd((Shelw) WORK PONT/ '' nO 22-I I' Mpta44 FLASH Flaa(.mg SHO S6cn ld)(mg1 POINT/CONTROL POINT Tn O AUTO Aummem FLUOR F7u!,n SHO Sh=t 16"LMLIA - REQUIRED E7GS11NC PROPOSED APR Ab..Fm4bed Haar FOG Faa or Cotume SHTH. Sho,bmg O DOORSYMBOL AT.G of FOM Faav(Lf'vnry N SRO_ ➢ t 1 CHERRY FOS Fm¢(Smd SL Sldin+" •1°T�l LOT ILOTARIEGR7IS, H POW Faa o(S N Nord, SIM Slmllu � �r ! MIN LOTWID t5o SF. 19,905 BF NO CHANGE OD Board Dtny p ,J WINDOW SYMBOL I ' It NtlLY�( I MIN LOT WIDTH 150 IOISP NO CHANCE BEI. B¢ew, FPRF Fi,cpmv( NT N.-I SND SmI�Nz bn �r I FED 2'W _ BTT BauMaow PS FuE Sue NLG Nv<m Canoe¢ SNR &Vl Napkin I\ RELOCATED \ N8o'� ��^'1� 04 53� MON.02'N PAINCIPALB(NDHiO hmr'D+(UMYARDRIT ACQU[REMENIE, B r HuEdwg Eve FT [t NOM Nvmmd Remfmdr l5 KEYNOTE SYMB0L N 1 102 STM \ I ✓ '76'OV E BLDG BWMu+g Fro Fuotlng NTS -1— SNT Solmr ,-RAhtE BARN E 1 5'N 0-4'E- AEQI1LIlED HXISTWG PROPOSED FUR Funmg SP Soondyrvd(4� Z �+_ EL 4 9 STOCKADE FE FRONTYARD sG II. NOCRkNOE ➢ix Bbtk RJT Tiuum SPG S SIDEYARDMML li' 166 hO CHANGE BLXG Burd,f'E FA DA Fur Door O BPD SwP Dupman l Z (N)FF1R 7 IN $°WHITE L 6 6' NOTAL SIDEYARI)S 35 549V NO CHANGE OM Bom SPEC. SNedfimia, R.,5 - ELEVATION REFERENCE Ut EL,<70' BIRCH 10•TR AFARYAAD 50 15767' NO CH.WCE HOT Bmmm G/ Orn SPKA spakn O 0 0 FE O/L 20"TREE NVIEIGHT 35 Fr/25 STORIES 2303''/2 STY NO CHANGE BRC. Bndng OA 0-11 SPL Sprdel _ MIN LIVABLE LE FLOOKAREA 850SF LIM SF OC GE It Bnck G OB Ob SQ S9't¢r m VAB N HAN BRZ Bm"" 0G Ot Cmtn SS s,amlty 9¢d - 1 . Pv -< (ft )fAXCOVERAGE 7L'S" ll l2% NO CHANGES HS Ovd.BMm GA G yc OD Ou¢,de D4mma SSK Smna BlNc DETAILELEVATIONREIERENCE T �.+ A 11 -{� OFF BELOW FIN FLA GAL C:T. OFCL O� F.r ,d/� A Surma 1 -' BTG pFTnW rpp OF OB 0-bB- .—, STD Snndud � OVI W 10°� ACL'LSSORYHUITDING MHA7MUbd YARI3lHT REQIIIREMENl<, CONCR£IL Gc Gm dC°n¢rcmr OFF DIB. S U s.. m�II It 2o'O' � REQUIMED EXISTING PROPOSED C GL Gwv°niud]mn C, Orcthewi HER. Smmee 1 SECTION REFERENCE pl 91.52 Iv DKr, Gab. OHMS Onl HodMd S¢ 57AUCr Btwra,d SES 12'.6' /''� GL 01- OHWS O.d Hnd Wmd S¢ew 15' Lot O 1B"EVE GREEN �c) O MIN sloe YARD 2O 33 NA N 26 CAB Cvbmn OR Grate OI Qpm Wrblm. SUS Sunperw¢I x ���JJJ MIN REARYARD 29 NA NO CHANGE GB C.t i Brom 8YM SAnmmN'1 _ GRT. Grout of OpaR°e SYN � t6aic MAX ROCHT Zr1875/LS STY 1975/iS STY / CEM. C—C-1.e.a1 GVL Gm d OPNO 0a burg v° 50" A EE i 12 5 -I Fri , Cm pyp ppi,vaa OPP Oppm4e � SOPurh DETAIL REFERENCE 8"TREE I SHS MAX AREA 66a sP 10735E NO CHANGE CU FT, Cuble Pae GSM Gdv.dtta,R._ C.FL [ouvta Flvhing N GL Cot Iran Mtl°' T 1 _ CTO C'bvg P OLXG 2:291,, H PAK P Jld T Tm.d 2 I of �5 0' SHEET INDEX CL. CION PART P'dmn TEG .TongucfiGmvn 12"TREE I ,"..'• CIA Clvr He Har Hebb PAV Pw(cB(1�(�rtJ Te TvuriB PHOTOREIRENCE I C0 COY°"t HC Ho 01. PCG Prro.tC¢n¢oe TG Top¢(Cuk LOt O I _ CO CA Out HD, Hurd PCP Pe I,puCublc TEL Telephone I L I COL C¢b.mn HDR .. .m Fovc THE Tcmpual /^�1 &lLS7[NG—TOR' V - ( Im 1°7� 'P"�6" SHUT DESCRIPTION CONC. Canrnu RR,W Hardvam PERI Puuvea THERMUT Tp' t ` /, REMOVED OR RELOCATED I ~•/ I Al TITIESHEEEPROJECTIIATA, CONN C.— THK Tlddt(pmJ 8"'TREE j'-EXSITING I TREES CONST Coo-¢ HDWD FL-h-d PERM Ptmmnmt THRFSHThtnMM l 1 N ZONING�MAfTAT10NS,SITE PLAN OONTRL Canna N.M. HdN Mnd PREFAB.Pmmbnn¢W TUL relnma 1 11"EVERGREEN It/25TY. I Id-5' 20'-0' CPA C¢vPcr NOR Hl=ml PLF P.d per Uad TP Top ofPavwmc FRAME to GP Cavemd Porcb HA Haur TPD Tvlltt Paper D4pcn.a `� I BARN D?CFT I V I AI LOCATION/PHOTO HCT H'g6e PG Plan Olen T PTN. Twle p.fi urn � 1 � C564T. C.,.. HVAC HTO Ho¢og PK PartirR TA T.,-. " u �l I 1 CTR. C HVAC HmdnJVmukrmn PL PI.- TSL Top vf:b � I I(PLR EL 6 1') I �� h3 PIANS 6t ELEVATIONS CSK Cammaudr AFrCaaJidvolg PL Pk¢11�minat TS7 Tvp MS¢d CV C POROUS CONI POROUS _ M POND ,-_22 6 _ {p PIAS Plana TV TdcWbn G7 ' 14\\�✓JNA GW Odd Wamt PLY Plpavod TW Tap of Wes➢ Y,0 CU YD (.1,61x'. I PTL Pmd TYP rTplml 24" CEDAR AI Q LD WIdeDWn'rr PP PmJewaPlne H FINA:3bj�l DA 13.11cAmng IN I� PR Pall 5LO 4CONE-WALL TI REVIDBL D'+HeINS 1 Inion YAEFIN ReB hw U D. Unlfv,melfdmg Cm _OEM Daod¢L [NT lvtal°t PRO) P-J= UN0. Uado EARTH CONCRETEBLOCK SEE DINT%[ ln,r,mtdit¢ PSG Pmnn>erd Can¢c¢ UNF Unbnhhrd l mDEP. Dcpa R4v Inv esF eaanmpas9°m uR. ur °D T112 ml DATEDIT w] FPsL Pi� ,Sq- vIv 10 ' 5°' FRONT YARD SET BA E82014 DLAc Dnm n 7 1 Pr P 4,t(d) v vnk L N DIM Dimmtmn , J°4t PTD P.PoTa+rd n4pe'n VAC vht, �I O 73 UPLRoom 4" E Cr••'.•Or AP:�C:L°a D75P, D4pmd IAN Imlmr PTO/R Paptt Towel D4pm.a/ VAR Vam4v RIGID INSUL ROUGHWOOD D L DoJ[rod IT Jvmt R.uvmdc VH V°Por Brock ' DN. Dmn PTA Prppc TowrlA'eprlc VERT v tib O I 09101• 1-.,• -Iy DP. Dampvmo0r'B PVG Palpmntl Chbdac VEST Wfl l STM- 1 DPA Dampn K VG V°Nal Onm DA Dvvr Q VIN V4T1 Jµ DR. Lbwaapvut Y_ KIP(1000IW VNA V. l�Y, , DW Damm•.¢. KIT 10,d,or QT QurrTTtlr VT Vtr0TNk BIOCIONG EIEVATIONS70NE v nC 13"TREE ZT DWO D,awmg KO Knvrkaut 6 7 ` nwR omwa A \ I ol2Hi4 13s iNcwDEPncrolOCAnohs �1C�'"° R W i ^� 79"SPRUCE 14 4 2 STORY Q� STREET E w west i i' ' FRAME ON NAVY____— L R Pub,R.dim W/ W,�S / / \ !°0515 _ 17 3 AVERAGE BLDG SETBACK ND care 0r DFscRPnoN E E. RAG RtmmarGNl WE Waaa Bar ' 6-5') FEO L R.B. Rabba eat EL= / I RLVISIOtJ5 EMST,(E)Md[ la. 4aLtb W G W'a CI°,a t'' `V 16 6� -(F RED EA Tad, NAB Isbvmta7 ORT Rubhtrde WD Ww,R G1A5$ STONE VE EB ;:;.aon Boo LAM. U drmm _CP Rcmf-d Cva,ra WOW Wmdow ,��y \ 28 B' CO LIPS. En.In Fm ST.- LAV Ln.wn flIR WG Wt.Glw T ,' \ PORCH 22"TREE 19"TREE rtLs mEP.�fW16giIMOP ThECONKACOP, J� Gn TO Y°R11YNL MW COND OY5 ANO RD Rm(Oraln WH Wpmr Hasty �////�� 9• COMPARE TI1EVI nim THE COVSTRI:CTGY EJ Eepavl°n lolnt LlL LefeHmd 0.O F. Rcan Hog Wf1A Whcd Bumps LlJ�G� �� 1 21 i 23 1 �� ( - L 5 vOcuymt5 ft=cm mMv1V_;aLfPAi Bs ELEG FJeate(aq LKA Latin mv¢ y`y-'/{ ELEV. b'leexla W M Wile Mesh F1dER Emctg¢y v LI+ I_1 R�ERWiFU ARdaE,�d10ne1 wro WE. tai PICKET zzKORS.O.P,nss�xrORavroBfrz ENAM. Emend LVR Laurct FIN(WOOD BRICK r� �` 11' �j5 7I' 81CGA'SBIEYOES OELTY/CcID SYRIA , FNG W.euro LBL La6d REF Rdnma WP waaP,wfing A EL a 6' R pp p L I� REEA Rdrle¢'a WS W.-Snip _ p �T Iiy SUG'IS „r R.fAS ALflVf1'_R30RLH TD inEAR(R1IEL7 EpOA ElgcsriolPond RCG Rt-. WSCT Wemnmt ��, �� S_12�49'�1J'r• CL EL EQ Equil E( REEQR­ WEQV Acqutral W T W Wea4 mt W'dl /�`,J M jJ/V FSI'°P Emm¢A MAS MaonR RES RmBnnt W WM Weided V ImMmh lJ J � 7 q r j 1•nOIECI NAME ECG Eto m MNL Mnmam NET Ruum m 5 4' PROPOSED BUILDING RELOCATION EKP Eapm.d MB Mxhc B.h REV RM,c(bv) Y BATT➢NSUL 1`; {T 1J 1 fo[[he �-' CL EL 1 Y BERTAULT RESIDENCE EXT Eae,wc MBAR. M..mn B¢¢a R.FG R-fiwYD Y01d ` CXT0. Eurvded �1 / T"/ 1J 4 8 IJOTE ORIENT,NY 11957 �NA Z SPIE PIAN INCOR'ORATE5 DATA °�W�TITLE FROM5URVEYPREmwBY TITLE SHEET,SITE PLAN,ZONNGDATA PLYWOODPECONIC 50RVEYOR5,P-C r, 1230 TRAVELER 5TREET DATE F)AVU DRA\mmc NO 5OUTHOLD,N.Y 11971 1141 DATED DECEMBER 12,2012 108NO scALP. ASSEOWN A° Dm" W ' IlCLE65EDTO 51TE PLAN 5DLE 1116=i'-o BHYVIEWEDG ROC PEnM °ATE Gary K. O'Connor ARCHITECT,LLC. 102 North Union Street imbertvllle,NJ 08530 UC.C2o'DA Phone: 609.397.3635 s M . a � 3 n .! � '. '� ;•.. 111 tir r 1 �.�• _._� JASx 1 VV V ARE BARN/CARRIAGE HH. #3 BARN f CARRIAGE H5E. #4 FLETCt1ER 5TREET,ORIENT,NY - FIETCHER STREET,ORIENT,Nv DISTANCE FROM&4RN TO THE STREET�12'-0' VIEW OF PROPOSED BARN LOCATION FROM WILLOW 5TREET , e , V__IEW Of PROP05ED BARN LOCATION BARN CARRIAGE 1i5E. #2 FROM VINCENT STREET VINCENT 5TREfr,OWN1,NY , J1+N 2 R 2014 •5TANC[FROM TO THE 5TREET<-12'-0' U f , .. __ e�cwrnov L'•"` REV.51ON5 "'.la � '`� k � ITemeusroe�anmoFrctonivaoz - - h T:. T)f^cul5ft'ION Da:wtxrs efrcrt mA.ancele ACTrtmcs ERRORS,0MAS.5M5 OR M'CMMatCT"I PROP05ED BUILDING RELOCATION RTAULT BERESIDENCE 95 NAVY 5TREET ORIENT.NY 1 1957 i Dplw NG MI. NEIGH50RHOOD PRECEDENCE PHOTOS BARN/CARRIAGE 115E. #I '" FRONT VIEW OF BERTAULT BARN DATe La l&19 WILLOW 5TREET,ORIENT,NY 1241 / - 1.8 015TANcf FRON<EARN TO PQcUNE OTO MAP INDICATING NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS AND PRECEDENCE OF BARN CARRIAGE HOU5E5 LOCATION PHORAOTO �' VVIISED TO --- P 1 Gary K. O'Connor REAR ROOF 17-11'± i e��pa ur:N�S"ia �_--__—__—__ ARCHITECT, LLC. DN. I North Union Street y �I Lambertville,NJ 08530 B Phone 609397.36. 5 E �J uJi u'r I TC.'PWTE 12'-0IL i pHEATER � ----------- _ _ _ _Il_ (E)R�5TRCOM � I Q`ONDROORB'-0B' EMIJ II I II I I Li I UP ----- _ EAST ELEVATION FRONT RCOF 18'-9°± L--- TOP PWTE 12'-0 I I i SECOND rt00R 8'-0'g --------- I Jull U1111 HIT � i I III it 111 11 111 1 1111 111111 111111 i ® 1 1 I,u _ i I _ WEST ELEVATION PERVIOU5 APRON 51MIWR OR EQUAL TO GRA55PAVE2 BY \ 1 INVISIBLE 5TRUC URE5,INC r———————————-----1 � I \ I � I I EXISTING BARN FLOOR PLANJAN JAN282aL, I , 2 8 2014 5CAIE:1l4'=I'-0' ' (E) DET CHED i E ; . SHED I � I I I FRONT ROOF 18'-9"± I I REAR ROOF 17'_I I'* I I I u I I I LJ WEST ELEVATION v I Ur21N< D5 IN4llDEPNATD OfVCS NO DATE BY DESCRIPIDK TOP PLATE 12'-0B' __ I 5CAUF 114'=V-O' REVI510N5 ----------- ------J --_BUI�DINGNT 12'-7°tcaTtlZRE u�m0cTI-tCC WRALToa f TO V[AFETrl A%Wd THDTIONSAND It TON 55OOND FLOOR"B° 1 �s5,�MiL`5�10S0RRAHfO Rmurlrs, FIRST FLOOR PLAN `�°�'�"'� uAvaaaT�REFOgFD To nIE ARAtIRff i / n ® 5CAlE 1/4'=I'-0' rNAME PROPOSED BUILDING RELOCATION / BERTAULT RE5IDENCE 95 NAVY5TREET ORIENT, i NY 11957 ' DRAWNG TRE GROUND F�COR d-0' I I PWN5*ELIEVATION5 .� DATE 1011[9 3 -,RAHW NO SOUTH ELEVATIONJW 70 1241 9CFlL A551NhYN NORTH ELEVATION SCAB IJ4'=I'-0' — SOUTH ELEVATION 5CAIE.1/4'=1-0' 5CALE 114- '-0' u u BAS" l��� A•3 RDAMIM BY GROG f BOARD MEMBERS �F so 01 Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �� yp 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 hO l0 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora [ Office Location: Eric Dantes G Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. ,'�c►� �O 54315 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento l�'COO ��.` Southold,NY 11971 •------ -•--•--. __._....T_-- •------�----..-•------_.._.--,._,...-..----http�/lsootholdtowluly.gov- - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 4, 2021 Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 L Ms. Sarah Lansdale, Director Suffolk County Department of Planning P.O. Box-6100 - no ►�� Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Dear Ms. Lansdale: Please find enclosed the following application with related documents -for review pursuant to Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code: ZBA File : # 7467 & 7468SE•1 Owner/Applicant : BERTAULT, Vincerit'- Action Requested' : Additions and 'alterations to an existing single family dwelling, construction-1 of an in-ground swimming pool, construction of an accessory pool house/cabana and the installation of a fence. Application #7468SE is for a Special Exception for an apartment in an accessoy building. Within 500 feet of: ( ) State or County Road (X) Waterway (Bay, Sound, or Estuary) ( ) Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State, Federal land ( ) Boundary of Agricultural District ( ) Boundary of any Village or Town Within one (1) mile (5,280 feet) of: ( ) Boundary of any airport If any other information is needed, please do not hesitate to call us. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman ZBA�Zirperson By. Encls. Survey/Site Plan : Gary R. O'Connor Dated : 12/15/2020 BOARD MEMBERSQF SOU Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson Tiff 53095 Main Road• P.O.Box 1179 � alp Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. �p� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento l,Ycou Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 December 8, 2021 Eric J. Bressler, Esq. Wickham, Bressler& Geasa, P.C. 13015 Main Road P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck,New York 11952 RE: Appeal No. 7468SE,Bertault 95 Navy Street, Orient SCTM No. 1000-26-1-12.2 Dear Mr. Bressler; Enclosed is a copy of the Zoning Board's December 2, 2021 Findings, Deliberations and Determination, the original of which was filed with the Town Clerk regarding the above special exception application. Thank you. Sincerely, i Kim E. Fuentes Board Assistant Encl. cc: Building Department a SURVEY OF PROPERTY --LLJ AT ORIENT to SCTM# 1000-26-01-04 o I TO WN OF SO UTHOLD DWELLING WELL SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. , r A ® WELL SCTM# 1000-26-01-05 1000-26-01-12.2 SCTM# 1000-26-01-03 DWELLING SCALE.' V= 30' DWELLING I WELL I DECEMBER 12, 2012 MARCH 2, 2020 i cP i NOVEMBER 23, 2020 (ELEVA71ONS) DECEMBER 3, 2020 (PROPOSED ADD/770N) CP 135' 177' ® WELL PDEC ,9, 12020 �IVED CL-EL � STREET' 5.1 to N/0/F WILL 0 W CLEL LAWRENCE BERSTEIN SCTM# 1000-26-01-06 N85-28'30"E 65.93' DWELLING I Zoning Hoard OfAppeais WELL I 52' EL4.3' O'• 140' )r C o N s, O 0),� `, � of � 22.3 1-1N' MRN89'56'00"E 22' .- N TOP 54.53' aE.1.5'N. MON.0.2'N 50 Z °i FOUNDATION , 0.4'E. EL-8.6' EL,3.9' STOCKADE FE. _ _ SCTM# 1000-26-01-13 1 15.0 9.4' i 20.0 ` EL.s.5' 70' DWELLING O \� ; FE.O I WELL p \ N 1 1 41 13.1' O � � s I L)t o PROPOSED SHED POOL ` - 11.3' 1 2.0' r�c `\ 5.0' (n 1 I TEST HOLE DATA FETAONING 1, N/0/F j i `\ SONIA GESELL McDONALD GEOSC/ENCS 4. 20• 5�;fin 1 Uu�i—Z6—t71-11.1 12/06/2019 WALL I �\ DWELLING Lot 0 4 � � WELL 11 DARK BROWN LOAM OL _ I co i BROWN SILT ML N/0/F D/AN & LYNN LEWIS �TM I 4' SCTM, 1000-26-01-12.1 1 ' BROWN FINE TO COARSE 9 DWEWNG SAND SM r 4.3' `�y WELL p 3-- WELL IN ® WELL V 13 U7ILROOM , t4 v ® WELL r Q `1 N 1 a,1 HSE. •5.2' WATER /N BROWN FINE TO •y I COARSE SAND SP 14.4 2 5TORY � FRAME - •.� o HOUSE I /SE•P71C (F.FLR•EL-6.5') / PROPOSED FE.O/L. I 28.8 COVERED 135.5 ���' PORCH CMF NO TE. WATER ENCOUNTERED 4.3' BELOW SURFACE v r-- ELEVA170NS REFERENCED TO NAVD 88 PICKET FE' • - COVERED EL 4 CMF n 1.1 POR i � �, 126.23 S82049'401K S$6 820"1K 85.71 KEY ��� 17.t) C5.5 Q = REBAR C4 8` STREET ® = WELL NAV Y A = STAKE 9 = TEST HOLE ® WELL ® = PIPE 62' 140' = MONUMENT ® I = WETLAND FLAG 130WELL I I = U77LITY POLE1 1 SCTM# 1000-26-01-24 SCTM#DWELLING 1000-26-01-25 OF Nc�V , SCTM# 1000-26-01-21 1 DWELLING �-a WELL Er� T. � NOTE: PROPERTY LOCATED ENTIRELY IN AE6 ZONE DWELLING p`�� FROM FlRM. No. 36103CO068H 9/25/2009. WELL ® WELL `v ' Lot s refer to "BUBOIVIS/ON MAP FOR JOHN H. WOODHOUSE & JER/LYN B. WOODHOUSE" FLED /N THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFf7CE I i -- - �l • ON APRIL 19, 2005 AS FILE N0.11245. THE LOCA 77ONS OF WELLS AND CESSPOOLS SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM FIELD OBSERVA77ONS AND OR FROM DATA OBTAINED FROM OTHERS: THEREFORE THEIR LOCA77ONS AND OR EXISTENCE LEACHING GALLEY .S L/C. N0. 49618 IS NOT GUARANTEED. cP PECON/C SURVEYORS, P.C. ANY ALTERAAON OR ADD177ON TO 1N/S SURVEY/S A WOLA77ON OF SEC77ON 7209 OF THE NEW AREA= 19,905 SQ.FT. J J J (631) 765-5020 FAX (631) 765-1797 YORK STATE EDUCA77ON LAW. EXCEPT AS PER SEC77ON 7209—SUBDIVISION 2. ALL �, P.O. BOX 909 CER77F/CA770NS HEREON ARE VALID FOR 7HIS MAP AND COPIES 7HEREOF ONLY /F SAID MAP OR J J 1230 TRAVELER STREET COP/ES BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF 7HE SURVEYOR WHOSE S/GNA7URE APPEARS HEREON. a 2JO TRAVELER LN.Y 1 TRE 112-2791 NOTE: SITE PLAN INCORPORATES DATAFROM SURVEY PREPARED BY: WILLOW PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.G., STREET GARY R. O'CONNOR SOUTHHOLD NEW YORK 11971 ' ' - - - - - - - - - _ - - N85°28'30 E I - - - EL.4.3' .� -�-�. - - - - - - +-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ 65.93 _ EL.5.2' ARCHITECT, AIA ���� ;, '' DECEMBER 12 2012 4_ � MARCH 02 2020 NOVEMBER 23, 2020 I A 3 TOTAL OFF - - - T.W. 9.2' r � 'y o C� - c �; a ,a DAMAGED STREET PARKING - - B.W. 5.2' ! �� l kt •S f' I: z� WILLOW TREE TO I -� �, ` BE REMOVED. 8 CORYELL STREET 4 20554 I /I LAMBEIRTVILLE NJ 08530 NEW WILLOW TREE ' TO BE PLANTED PHONE: 609.397.3635j. •MF�o � , el PROJECT DATA I I (V rMAP1000-26-01-12.2 I T.W. 6.8' _ _ _ I I � LOT#2(LOT REFERS TO SUBDIVISION MAP FILED IN SUFFOLK CO. ' B.W. 6.8' L J I 4 0 HIGH WD. 0) CLERK'S OFFICE. (APRIL 19,2005 AS FILE NO. 11245. - AT VERTICAL SLAT FENCE ADDRESS: 95 NAVY STREET ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 F ' EL.=7.8.3' E""� p ZONING DISTRICT: R-40, RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITYAA O SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE:AE-6' FROM FIRM. No.36103CO068H 09.25.2009 35' FRONT YARD SETBACK � o EXISTING:2 STY. PRINCIPAL FRAME DWELLING W/ACCESSORY SHED& ° ( ' I I EXISTING 1 1/2 STY. FRAME , N BARN BLDG. ' PROPOSED:-COVERED PORCH EXPANSION& 1 STY. FRAME ADDITION BARN W/ PROPOSED 1 1 N I BEDROOM ACCESSORY I TO PRINCIPAL BLDG. 0 (^ ` APARTMENT& 1 CAR -CHANGE USE OF SHED FROM STORAGE TO CABANA. I GARAGE I 4'-0" HIGH WD. -ACCESSORY POOL. I ' EL.4,9' VERTICAL SLAT FENCE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE: 15 FLR. EL.=8.6 6'-0" HIGH HEDGEROW W/ 1 20' T.W. 9.2' SHED AND BARN RELOCATED PER ZBA FILE:6729 HIDDEN WIRE FENCING I. : `, I EL.=7.83' Y1 • B.W. 7.83' B.W4 9' N89°56,00"C VARIANCES PANSION OFF EXISTING NON-CONFORMING FRONT YARD SEBACK 3 _ I I 41J _DOWN C 54.53 FOR PRINCIPAL BLDG. _7 C41 IT W 9.2' -LOCATION OF POOL IN FRONT YARD C/)IIr EL.=7.83' - _ SHED f I 1 Ip EL.=7.25' T.W. 6.7' 7=6. ELZONING COMPUTATIONS . W. 6.6, I mlo 0/a EL.6.6' ZONING DISTRICT:R-40 F--1,0 w>- to1� ,p LOT REQUIREMENTS: REQUIRED EXISTING* PROPOSED t, I 010 l� ..a MIN. LOT SIZE 40,000 S.F. 19,905 S.F. NO CHANGE i .p MIN. LOT WIDTH 150 FT. 104 FT. NO CHANGE MIN. LOT DEPTH 175 FT. 207 FT. NO CHANGE I ¢Iw }IV I DN. N I o1Q EL.=7.83' ' DN. O PRINCIPAL BUILDING MINIMUM YARD/HT REQUIREMENTS: = - I 0 EL.=7.831 > [�0 I m REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED 1 1 FRONT YARD 35' 1.08' NO CHANGE L _ SIDE YARD 10'(BOTH 25') 16.6'&55' 16.6'&40.64' _ ° REAR YARD 35' 106.5' 90' I 35'R EgR Y I ,4 I NEW IN-GROUND POOL - _ ARD SETB MAX HEIGHT 35 FT 21' NO CHANGE 10')(21 _ - ACK FOR PRINCIPAL gLG• 21/2 STY. 2 STY. NO CHANGE I I 8'09' "1 LARGEST FLOOR AREA(INCLUDING COVERED PORCq- 2,001 S.F. NEW BUILDING AREA: 613 S.F. .,_MIN. 5' s 1 I SHED FLOOD HAZARD ZONE: AE-ELEVATION-6' T.W. 8.17 NEW STONE EXISTING FLOOR ELEVATION: 6.5' EXISTING STONE B.W. 7.83' WALL CURB WALL i:" ':. �^- HORIZONTAL PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION: 8' T.W. 8.17' _ ENLARGEMENT TO ACCESSORY BUILDING (BARN)MINIMUM YARD I HT. REQUIREMENTS: B.W. 4.0' ,..�., ; B.W. 7.0' cw EXISTING HOUSE POWDER �` „n. B.W. 5.2' r o SHED ROOM &WET BAR REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED NEW CABANA AREA: 280 SF. SIDE YARD 15' 15'&20' NO CHANGE 4'-0" HIGH HEDGEROW W/ `' I TOTAL SIDE YARDS 25' 35' NO CHANGE HIDDEN WIRE FENCING REAR YARD 2 NIA NO CHANGE e '-.,..-.ern,.. _ .:... ........ 1 GAT I If` MAX HEIGHT 22' 19'-4"11.5 STY. NO CHANGE ff RAIN I FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA: 439 S.F. ±' I GARDENI SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA: 302 S.F. DOWN �i 8.09 TOTAL: 741 S.F.<750 S.F. 6.6 FR. GAR. i I I SITE COVERAGE: EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING DWELLING 950 S.F. T.W. 7.3' 1 I� 35.66' T.W. 6.6' 40.64' I �� �- EXISTING COVERED PORCH 210 S.F. tG:t tVc/3 B.W. 5.0' B.W. 6.6' i `���[� EXISTING SHED 184 S.F. r I vti 1 Y B.W. 7.0' (SEC EXISTING BARN 930 S.F. 1 U DN. I 0 2 PROPOSED NEW ADDITION 613 S.F. m o73UP I m G,llll 13,o C)"� ��nr �01� PROPOSED COVERED PORCH 228 S.F. w m 15.66' 20' - •6' a ��`�''� PROPOSED POOL 220 S.F. N _ m I 7J'! i Z PROPOSED SHED ADDITION 96 S.F. O ', 44` i < y I Q U r a TOTAL PRO= 1 wa f 0 DWELLLIN�G 950 S.F. 613 S.F. 1,563 S.F. OSED 1 STY. FRAME I Of O .� `u`f' I U) ACDITION. 613 SQ. FT. N I w FR. HSE. ' , I I U- PROPOSED FLR. EL.=8'/ I U ;p Lot 1TOTAL BUI LDING AREAS 2,274 S.F. 1,157 S.F. 3,431 S.F. � y_ 1 T.W. 9.0' 2.67' Ll; m --' WCJl ALLOWED EXISTING PROPOSED B W 7.0' AGE 20/0 11.4% 17.2% G ,tti, yl I j i 0 MAX LOT COVERo 0 a n' I - - - ` z-►1JI "' "' 7� - EXISTING I 1 6.6' I } *PRE-EXISTING NON-CONFORMING LOT PER SECTION 280-124 Z I M UTILITY �T Z3 w �) RN. EXISTING 0 Q 0 �- -1 z I MECHANICAL �n 0 0 Cn 1 MUD ROOM. N '-> I L) EXISTING KITCHEN N i 0 T.W. 9.0' I N0. DATE BY DESCRIPTION �7 LB f 7.0' 4.38' �h _ 1 35' F' 5' FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR I REVISIONS G 1' _ _ f y` :,.r 7 LO I \ 1 - .- _ R PRINCIPAL BLDG) IT IS THE RESPONSIBLITIY OF THE CONTRACTOR o ti-4�. ,,l 1 N Y✓AJ TO VERIFY MW HTHE ALL ICONSTRUCTION ELD CONDITIONS AND RE DOCUMENTS T GARDEN T.W. 7.3' 14' BEFORE COMMENCING.ACTIVITES,ERRORS, OMMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES 1 -B.W. 5.3'==- UP DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE REPORTED 0 `Yq I EXISTING 2 STY. FRAME HOUSE TO THE ARCHITECT ,.� PROPOSED FLR.EL.-8) PROJECT NAME PROPOSED ACCESSORY APARTMENT C AVERAGE SET BACK ON NAVY STREET: 17.3' for 16.6 - N VINCENT BERTAULT BASED ON PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C., V" PROPOSED COVER D APRIL 25, 2013 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 `f`''"' I PORCH EXPANSION. DRAWINGTITLE 2SQ. FT. T.W. 6.7' SITE PLAN, PROJECT DATA& ZONING COMPUTATIONS I 6 i II 8.6 o ti B.W. 6.6' B.W. 6.6' 126.23' EL.4.8 I Up T.W. 6.T DATE 12.15.20 DRAWING NO. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -,- - - - - - - - - - _ 7.78' B.W. r - - - - 1950 S82°49'40"W 17.86' _LE_ =-' -' ' -- - - - - - - ; EL.6.0' SCALE: 1"= 10'-0" X06 No. NAVYSTREET - -. _ _ _ _ SITE PLAN DRAWN DS A-1 S86° 8'2O"W _ - - - . r. - SCALE:AS SHOWN 85.71 ' k_:"_ - - - - _ _ BY: REVIEWED BY: GRO'C GARY R. O'CONNOR ARCHITECT, AIA 4 " 4�" A ' l Q�r(-T) n r. 8 CORYELL STREET 0 oll LAMBERTVILLE, NJ 08530 PHONE: 609.397.3635 12'-2" 91-411 r '7 t NEW LIVING AREA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1ST FLOOR LIVABLEAREA:439 S.F. OPEN TO BELOW f cv) 0) C14 121-211 S21 4 K4 Lu uj -r7-7-7- /u DN. -T NEW KITCHEN co 4)UP 0) I I VOLUME CEILING BELOW NI I K 5'-0"HEAD H 5'-0"HEAD HEIGHT LIGHT STORAGE-— -— -—— NEW BEDROOM 2ND FLOOR LIVABLE AREA:302 S.F. RECEIVED NEW 1 CAR U co 9 7�6,q NEW WORKSHOP C? 60 GARAGE NEW BATHROOM to DEC 2' 12020 co Lo /-Oning ""'ard 0f APPeals II F7 , 5'-0" HEAD HEIGHT ATTIC 5'-0"HEAD HEIGHT 11h M - — - — - — - — - — -- 12-61/4" 8'-5114" 5'-1 0314" 15-2 3/4" NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION REVISIONS IT IS THE RESPONSIBLITlY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND COMPARE THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS BEFORE COMMENCING.ACTIVITES,ERRORS, OMMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT PROJECT NAME PROPOSED ACCESSORY APARTMENT for BERTAULT RESIDENCE 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 DRAWING TITLE PROPOSED PLANS DATE 12.15.20 DRAWING NO. JOB NO. 1250 DATE JOB No. 1 1 W SCALE:AS SHOWN DRAWN DS B Y. A-2 [Y: I W REVIEWED G, PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4"= 1'-0" PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" V-0' BY: GRO'C GARY R. O'CONNOR rs.:3 ct;x ARCHITECT, AIA �a , :. f , 8 CORYELL STREET �`A �l- °.NY` tC 020554 4. .. LAMBERTVILLE, NJ 08530 PHONE: 609.397.3635 '*K 'd . TOP OF ROOF 119-7 TOP OF ROOF 119-7 -e,` • ' - - - - - - - - — - — - — - — - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -11 If - - - y It It III If 11 If I L 1 11 IL f - I I — - — — — — — J. I I - I �,—_J-T��— — .-,-i—_ T �I � i i TT , T _ I i. j I I I ; 1 , 1 I I i I I I 1 I i 1 I I I I : iy 1 1 a 11 1 rl — i : , I - if I I i ,I I 1 -I ' y T- - - -- - - J--L 1 -,I i I j I I I T , -• I I I I I � I I I I I I 1 I I : — i — -T- T., — — I I I I _ : ` I I r n � n FINISH FLOOR 100'-0" FINISH FLOOR 100".0" - - ---- --- -------- -- ---- - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r — r � �I (ELEVATION 8.6) (ELEVATION 8.6) I I II' I I I L r - - L _ -.— _ - - - - -� L - -- - - - J TNORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 114"= V-0" 2 WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 114"= V-0" 0 1 TOP OF ROOF 119'-7r' TOP OF ROOF 119'-7" it 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11RECEIf IL- IIL- IVED 11 11 11 IL -- --- Il 11 —If 11 If If 11 11 11 11 1 11 it 11t -1 _ - � - • - -- DEC � 12020 11 11 If 11 11 L - ) T1i Zoning Board Ofd, I I I r I I I 11 If 11 1 11 It 11 11 11 11 11 If If 11 11 11 11 11 7-7 1 I I r • I I- — — -- { I _ I '-- -I- I r 1 -J T , I : 1 r A- I i T r 17 I , - - ! i i II I I � I r I - - T— — ---- - - -- — - NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION i I I — — — — — — — — J — -- — , I : : a - REVISIONS I T : i r " — — - — — -- — — _, Lr IT IS THE RESPONSIBLITIY OF THE CONTRACTOR 1 - - - FINISH FLOOR 100-0 r F T 1 , I a FINISH FLOOR 100'-0" (ELEVATION 8.6) -' - - — - - — - — - — — — LL J r THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS - SH - - -- - — - - — - - (ELEVATION 8.6) TO VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND COMPARE E B FORE COMMENCING, E ERRORS, ACTIVIT S OMMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES I I DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE REPORTED I I I I I TO THE ARCHITECT I I I I I PROJECT NAME rt — rl — _ 1, I _ I E r - - - � PROPOSED ACCESSORY APARTMENT L- - - L - - - - - - -I L- - - - - - - - - -� for ism BERTAULT RESIDENCE 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT,NEW YORK 11957 DRAWING TITLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DATE 12.15.20 DRAWING NO. a z JOB NO. 1250 G DRAWN DS SCALE:AS SHOWN A-3 BY. r- - " _ REVIEWED 3 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 114 - 1 0 4 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 114„- 1,-o" BY: GRO'C WELL w DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: CL.EL. N/0/F WOVEN WIRE FENCE S`7 M B❑L THE PROPOSED ON-SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO PROVIDE STORAGE TEST HOLE DATA 5.1' (MIN. 14 GAUGE FOR A 2'RAINFALL. STORAGE TO BE PROVIDED IN PRECAST LEACHING McDONALD GEOSCIENCE EET LAWRENCE B ER STEI N W/ MAX, 6' MESH GALLEYS PROVIDING 32 CF PER VERTICAL FOOT OF STORAGE AND 12/EL. 5. 9 C4 EL- S T� 10' MAX, C. T❑ C. SPACING) FRENCH DRAINS PROVIDING 2.08 CF/FT OF STORAGE. THE DESIGN IS O 4. SCTM# 1000-26-01-06 BASED ON THE FOLLOWING RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS:ROOF 1.0, DARK BROWN LOAM OL WILL1 65.93 TRENCH DRAIN DWELLING N8�.28�30"E 36" MIN, LENGTH FENCE ASPHALT PAVEMENT 1.0,GRAVEL PAVEMENT 0.70 AND LANDSCAPING TW 9.2 WELL POSTS DRIVEN MIN. 16' 0'10' BROWN SILT ML BW 5.2 . . .3:8' (EL 20 HIGHEST EXP. GROUNDWATER ELEK) 4.7 BW 5.2 .: INTO GROUND, DRAINAGE AREA'A' _ 3-PROPOSED 8.5 X 4.75 X 2 4 ASPHALT DEEP GALLEY j STORAGE REQUIRED: SAND 4.3' w ROOF AREA: 579.8 SFX 1.00 X 2"/12= 96.6 CF BROWSM N f7NE TO COARSE 52 EL. \ DRIV WAY w PROPOSED LANDSCAPE RETAINING HEIGHT ❑F FILTER Q WALL(NON SEPTIC RETAINING) �v PAVEMENT AREA: 567.8 SFX 1.00 X 2"/12= 94.6 CF 4.3 (EL 1.5 GROUNDWATER ELEK) w _ _ = 18' MIN, Q PROPOSED RETAINING WALL _ =191.2 CF w Q (SEPTIC RETAINING) WATER /N BROWN FINE TO TW 8.0 y •v��,� .v v •L �0� y V, �,� y y 6 MIN, 191.2 CFI 32.0 CFNF=5.9 VERTICAL FEET REQUIRED COARSE SAND SP BW 7.5 8 (j, CDTW TORAGE PROVIDED: �( AT 2.3' 9.2 BW 6.8 PERSPECTIVE VIEW USE GALLEYS 1-1I/2 STY. 7.83 O \ N 9°5 'oo„E 22r 13 36" MIN. FENCE POST DRAINAGE AREA"B' NOTE• WA7ER ENCOUNTERED 4.3' BELOW SURFACE FUTURE 1 BEDROOM ACCESSORY N BARN 4. 3' aE.1.5'N. MON.0.2'N �p WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MIN. 14 -\ STORAGE REQUIRED: APARTMENT WITH 1 CAR GARAGE a FIF.8.6' EA W4\9 ' 0.4'E. �'- GAUGE W/ MAX, 6' MESH(PENDING PECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION Z STO KA E FE. ROOF AREA: 291.6 SF X 1.00 X 2"/12=48.6 CF ELEVATIONS REFERENCED 70 NAND 88 G.F. 8.6' BW 9 - W - -BW 6.5,- FR THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZBA) 9 4' 20.0' - B1 vv W 6.7 ' SPACING) WITH FILTER CLOTH 20'MIN, • -7 48.6 CF/32.0 CFNF=1.52 VERTICAL FEET REQUIRED 0 78 TW 9.2 \ FE.O/L. / 0 FFLLOWW_ BW 7.83 F7� N \ N 7.83 +•25 p I I 1 (n UNDISTURBED GROUND TORAGE PROVIDED: P POSED 8.5'X4.75'X 1.5'DEEP O O \ a, 0 \ I�i .p COMPACTED SOIL USE 1-LEACHING GALLEY-1 GALLEYS X 2 CFNF=2 VF<1.52 VF GENERAL NOTES GALLEY I I PROPOSED SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM EMBED FILTER CLOTH 16'MIN. DRAINAGE AREA"C" I I MAX.EL.7.5 A MIN. OF 6' IN GROUND, STORAGE REQUIRED: 1. ALL MATERIALS AND NIETHODS OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE °N LIQ N STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON AND THE SUFFOLK 4'L--- ROOF AREA: 287.7 SF X 1.00 X 2"/12=47.9 CF COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES AS REQUIRED. 1 I �\ _ _J O MIN.ELEV.6.2 SECTION VIEW +7 83 7.83 I WELL I p\a r 47.9 CF_/32.0 CFNF=1.49 VERTICAL FEET REQUIRED 2. BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION FROM SURVEY BY PECONIC SURVEYORS Lot . O 0 7 \' \T f I1 S PROPOSED LANDSCAPE RETAINING C❑N S T R U C T I❑N SPECIFICATIONS DATED MARCH 2,2020. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO THE NAV 88 DATUM. NEW IN GROUND ). ) I I 1 WALL(NON SEPTIC RETAINING) STORAGE PROVIDED: 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL UTILITIES PpOL kCDW L ' •2 NEW I I I 1 ` USE 1-LEACHING GALLEY-1 GALLEYS X 1.5 CFNF=1.5 VF<1.49 VF PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK THE CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED ALL 1. WIVEN WIRE FENCE T❑ BE FASTENED SECURELY T❑ FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES 10'X 22' CABANA 1 I I 5.0' SUBSURFACE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS CONCEPTUAL AND MUST BE F. .7,71 I 11I N/O/F ❑P STAPLES. POSTS SHALL BE STEEL EITHER "T' ❑R 'U' TYPE ❑R HARDWOOD. DRAINAGE AREA"D" CONFORMED ACCORDINGLY IN THE FIELD. STONE RETAINING WALL p0 �II SONIA GESELL STORAGE REQUIRED: c3I 2. FLTER CLOTH TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE FENCE WITH TIES 4. AMINIMUM SEPARATION OFTEN(10)FEET HORIZONTALANDEIGHTEEN(18)INCHES TW8.17 BW 4.0 TVV78 TW 17 7.2 I 10.4' L� SCTM# 1000-26-01-11.1 SPACED EVERY 24' AT T❑P AND MID SECTION. FENCE SHALL BE W❑VEN WIRE, ROOF AREA: 972.0 SFX 1.00X2"112=162.0 CF VERTICAL IS TO BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN WATER LINES,STORM DRAINAGE AND/OR I SANITARY LINES OR STRUCTURES. BW 7.83 BW 5. 6' MAXIMUM MESH OPENING. 6.6 7.2 7.2 TW 6.7 DWELLING 162.0 CF-/32.0 CFNF=5.1 VERTICAL FEET REQUIRED O + 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR;SECURING ALL NECESSARY PERMITS RAtD)N --- BW 6.3 WELL 3. W,dEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY SHALL BE OVER- BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. Lot GAR RAIN GARDEN PON In O I PROPOSED 8.5'X 4.75'X 1.5'DEEP LAPPED BY SIX INCHES AND FOLDED. FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE EITHER FILTER X, STORAGE PROVIDED: TOP EL.3.5 -1 P (D USE 3-LEACHING GALLEY-3 GALLEYS X 2 CFNF=6 VF<5.1 VF 6. ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIAL AND DEBRIS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH -o GALLEY MIRAFI 100X, STABILINKA T140N, ❑R APPROVED EQUIVALENT. TOWN,COUNTY,STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS,CODES AND ORDINANCES.CONTRACTOR BOT EL 2.5 I TW 6.6 N SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DISPOSING OF ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIALS OFFSITE. c� BW 6.6 -+ 4, PREFABRICATED UNITS SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SHOWN, DRAINAGE AREA"E DEBRIS SHALL NOT BE BURIED ONSITE. I BW 0 M.M. D STORAGE REQUIRED: N/O/F \ 7.3 16 C:35. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND MATERIAL REMOVED WHEN ROOF AREA: 1,045.4 SF X 1.00 X 2"112=174.2 CF 7. ALL PRECAST STRUCTURES SHALL INCLUDE SUFFICIENT STEEL REINFORCEMENT FOR EVAN & LYNN LEWIS BW O + - + T 0 ' 'BULGES' DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE, TEMPERATURE AND SHRINKAGE,TRANSPORT,AND TO ALLOW THE STRUCTURE TO 174.2 CF_/32.0 CFNF-5.4 VERTICAL FEET REQUIRED WITHSTAND AASHTO H-20 LOADING AT THE COVER CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 70 SCTM# 1000-26-01-12.1 1 73 ® 0 rn ADAPTED FROM DETAILS PROVIDED BY: USDA - NRCS, 8. ALL PRECAST STRUCTURES SHALL BE MANUFACTURED WITH 4000 PSI 128 DAY I T' NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP❑RTATI❑N, REINFORCED STORAGE PROVIDED: STRENGTH CONCRETE. DWELLING O 6.6+ ao 1 Z 3-PROPOSED 8.5'X 4.75'X 2' NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIR❑NMENTAL CONSERVATION, SILT FENCE USE 3-LEACHING GALLEY-3 GALLEYS X 2 CFNF=6 VF<5.4 VF WELL O _3 I 7 3 t 3 ' 6pOM\ �W DEEP GALLEY NEU Y❑RK STATE S❑IL & WATER C❑NSERVATI❑N C❑MMITTEE 9. SANITARY PIPE TO BE SDR 35 PVC ORAS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. 3-PROPOSED 8.5'X 4.75'X 2' + ® WELL O °' N UTIL. 10. DURING CONSTRUCTION,EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES TO BE UTILIZED DEEP GALLEY v o \ p \ (31 WELL AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT TO OFF-SITE AREAS, PONDS,DRAINAGE INLETS,ETC. THE METHODS AND MATERIALS EMPLOYED IN THE 90 O Q �' 10.1 5.2' \ -P ,�, 1 STY. _� SYMBOL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL CONFORM TW 7.3 I - 1 HSE. O + FLOW ^ TO'fHE NEW YORK GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL". BW 5.3 6.6 11. ALL BACKFILL SHALL BE SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL COMPACTED TO 95%MAXIMUM 7.3 O �/ DENSITY AT THE OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT,AS DETERMINED BY STANDARD 14.4' RAME PROCTOR TEST. EC.2 STY. F HOUSE �- 4' VERTICAL FACE I 12. LOT AREA:19,905 S.F_ (3 BEDROOM) EX I v - SEPTIC N CP .F.F.EL.6.5 FE.OA- TW 6.7 O PROP F F EL. 8.0 BW 6.6 135.5 BEDDING DETAIL 2g-g OVE�� BW 6.0 0 CMF 90 NOT TO SCALE BW 5.2 DRAINAGE AREA NO MORE THAN 1/4 ACRE PER 100 FEET BUILT UP BERM PICKET FE- TW 6.7 EL.6.0 _ OF STRAW BALE DIKE FOR SLOPES LESS THAN 25%, 71 126.23 ---E 4 CMFBW 6.6 85 1.1 . 'L�_O W S86"1812 0 W 10'MIN. NOTE: S82.49 CL.EL. ANGLE FIRST STAKE TOWARDS , !' /- ,-�1 1. A CONCRETE WASH PIT SHALL BE INSTALLED PREVIOUSLY LAID BALE. r/ f ON THE PROPERTY FOR EXCESS CONCRETE CL.EL. FLOW �� /�"� ,__-_ AND TO CLEAN CONCRETE EQUIPMENT AND ' S TREET -T_ TOOLS. 4.8 J- IVA V � �yr BOUND BALES PLACED 2. THE PIT SHOULD BE SURROUNDED WITH A 24"V�tlrii�Wni/// Z HIGH SOIL BERM. ��,�^;� ❑N CONT❑UR. 2 3. THE PIT TO BE LINED WITH HAY BALES SITE PLAN 2 RE-BARS, STEEL PICKETS 4. PROVIDE A24"x24'WOODSIGN LABELED SCALE:1'=20'-0' - OR 21X2' STAKES PLACED HAY BALE 'CONCRETE WASHOUT PIT'. 1 1/2 TO 2 IN GROUND. 5. THE PIT SHOULD BE EMPTIED WHEN 75% _ - DRIVE STAKES FLUSH WITH CAPACITY IS REACHED AND AFT ESS 7� S TOP OF BALE, CONCRETE CURES. ANCHORING DETAIL RECEIVED NOT TO SCALE C❑NSTRUCTI❑N SPECIFICATI❑NS PLA" MAR 11 2021 10'MIN. HAY BALE 2011119 Board ofb &IS 1. BALES SHALL BE PLACED AT THE TOE OF A SLOPE OR ON THE CONTOUR AND IN A Engineering,P.C. Itisaw a on fthe ROW WITH ENDS TIGHTLY ABUTTING THE ADJACENT BALES, BUILT UP BERM New York State Education Law,Article 11 ? 21 2.� 145,Section 7209,for any person unless 2, EACH BALE SHALL BE EMBEDDED IN THE SOIL A,MINIMUM OF (4)• INCHES, AND 2 MIN EX GRADE acting under the direction of a licensed ProfPLACED S❑ THE BINDINGS ARE HORIZONTAL. Surveyor, tal o eyitemiitect or Land SECTION Surveyor,to after any item in any way.If an 3. BALES SHALL BE SECURELY ANCHORED IN PLACE BY EITHER TWO STAKES OR Aritembeari a de sealofa aftereeer, A Architect,or Land Surveyor is altered,the RE-BARS DRIVEN THROUGH THE BALE. THE FIRST STAKE IN EACH BALE SHALL altering Engineer,Architect,or Land BE DRIVEN TOWARD THE PREVIOUSLY LAID BALE AT AN ANGLE TO FORCE THE CONCRETE WASH-OUT AREA DETAIL Surveyor shall affix to the item his/her DOWNSPOUT BALES TOGETHER. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN FLUSH WITH THE BALE. seal and the notation'Atteredby' followed by his/her signature and the (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) 4. INSPECTION SHALL BE FREQUENT AND REPAIR REPLACEMENT SHALL BE MADE date of such alterations,and a specific T PROMPTLY AS NEEDED. description ofthe alteration. DOWNSPOUT ADAPTER > OR APPROVED EQUAL)(ADS o 5. BALES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USEFULLNESS S❑ (SEE CHART FOR PART NUMBER) HEAVY DUTY MANHOLE FRAME AND AS NOT TO BLOCK OR IMPEDE STORM FLOW OR DRAINAGE. 18'x 18'x 8' s SLOTTED COVER CAMBELL FOUNDRY CO. CONCRETE PAD PATTERN No.1383 OR SOLID MANHOLE W/#4 REBAR CAMBELL FRAME&COVER OR AN APPROVED EQUAL COVER PATTERN No.101 2A-TYPE C OR AN ADAPTED FROM DETAILS PROVIDED BY, USDA - NRCS, EACH SIDE STRAW BALE L E MIN.2 BRICK APPROVED EQUAL NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, SLOPE STABILIZATION NOTES: REVISIONS PLUG OR STOPPER NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIR❑NMENTAL C❑NSERVATI❑N, PROPOSED GRADE COURSES CONCRETE COVER BELOWDIKE NEW YORK STATE S❑IL & WATER C❑NSERVATI❑N C❑MMITTEE v CONCRETE COLLAR GRADE IN GRASS AREAS 1. EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS ARE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED ON THE 1:3 SIDE SLOPES. (} , •.:i AS NECESSARY C/) 450 BEND(MAX) TRAFFIC 2. THE EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE CURLEX I AS MANUFACTURED BY AMERICAN EXCELSIOR {� i •+ .PVC SCR�5 RISER AS REQ'D OR AN SEE PRECAST STRUCTURE BEARING SLAB FINISHED GRADE COMPANY,ARLINGTON,TEXAS(800-777-7645)OR APPROVED EQUAL APPROVED EQUAL ® NOTES FOR REINFORCING > w 6'ADS PIPE(LENGTH VARIES) LEACHING BASIN NOTES: REQUIREMENTS. V MIN. EXCAVATE AND BACKFILL 3 FEET 3. THE EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND ANCHORED AS PER 24" 2 MAX AROUND LEACHING RINGS WITH 1.ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCEPTABLE LEACHING SOILS AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. IN THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION. SNAP CONNECTION z m ' \ "J g c SUITABLE POROUS MATERIAL AS EVENT POOR LEACHING MATERIAL IS ENCOUNTERED,EXCAVATION IS TO BE CONTINUED TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND 45'BEND N o f APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. ' � +•. 450 BEND MAX Z ®®� BACKFILLED AS DETAILED. . OC EPOR PLUG WYE UNTIL PART# PIPE SIZE A B C G) AS REQUIRED "' 4"MIN. 8'EQUALIZATION CLEANOUT IS 0364AA 3' 2.50. 3.25 4.75' SHEET PILING AS REQUIRED 2. NO TRENCH,PIT OR OTHER EXCAVATION SHALL BE LEFT OPEN OR UNATTENDED. EXCAVATIONS TO BE PROTECTED AS 0464AA 4' 2.50' 3.25' 4.75• o PIPE TO GALLEY DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER WITH FENCES,BARRICADES AND OTHER APPROVED METHODS. 1 s Z 3 COLLAR S.C.T.M.: DIST. 1000 SEC.26 BLK. 1 LOT. 12.2 INSTALLED 0465AA 4- 3.25' 4.50' 5.00' WRAP WITH 6 OZ.(MIN.)NONWOVEN g ROOF DRAINAGE COLLECTION LINE 0466AA 4' 256' 2.56' 4.63' 6'ROOF DRAIN LATERAL GEOTEXTILE(FILTER FABRIC AND AT iv 3. ALLOW FOUR(4)INCHES FOR FINAL ADJUSTING OF CASTING. ADEQUATE BEARING WILL BE PROVIDED USING CONCRETE (SEE PLAN FOR SIZE) 0664AA 6' 3.62' 5.63' 6.43' WITH WYE(TYP.) ) GROUNDWATER B E RTAU LT R E,.►I D E N C E 0664A ' 6' 3.62 5.63' 6.43' TOP OF COLLAR BY MIRAFI OR AN BLOCK BRICK AND/OR 1:2 MORTAR MIX C 'Part 0664-AC is PVC NOTE 6'ADS PIPE MAY BE DISTANCE VARIES APPROVED EQUAL. NOTE; PLUG USED WHEN A DOWNSPOUT IS (SEE GRADING AND LEACHING GALLEYS TO BE 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE SHEETING AND SHORING DURING TRENCHING ER INSURE THE SAFETY OF Scale:AS SHOWN Condon Engineering' P.C. CONNECTED DIRECTLY TO THE DRAINAGE PLAN) MANLFACTURED BY LONG ISLAND WORKMEN AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC EXPOSED TO THE HAZARDS OF FALLING AND SLIDING MATERIAL IN CONFORMANCE 95 NAVY STREET ET CULTEC DRAINAGE EXCAVATE A MINIMUM OF 6'INTO VIRGIN STRATA OF PRECAST OR AN APPROVED EQUAL WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TITLE 29 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS,PART 1926,SAFETY AND HEALTH REGULATIONS ORIENT, NY 45'WYE FITTING STRUCTURES. SAND AND GRAVEL OR TO BOTTOM OF DRYWELL LEACHING FOR CONSTRUCTION(OSHA). Drawn by:JJC 1755 Sigsbee Road OF CLEANOUT DETAIL ROOF D RAI N ADAPTER DETAIL WHICHEVER IS DEEPER. GALLEY DETAIL 5. BACKFILL AND COMPACTION SHALL BE IN 6'LIFTS. ALL BACKFILL MATERIAL TO BE COMPACTED BY JETTING OR OTHER Mattituck, New York 11952 GRAD I N C� & APPROVED MEANS. (631) 298-1986 (631) 298-2651 fax Date: 12114/2020 www.condonengineeling.com D RAI NAGE PLAN I GARY R. O'CONNOR 3 3 ARCHITECT, AIA \ w�r_4+$.�rvF-kei-b„:,/'�i+ti;f�c-•.;,�����.�-Y��•a,�d'a1 ��_.1'�w,_1*+4Y^/+�{ker-.".'•-/-,r,-<rfte'-..,k,�:`=`aw��-�:.,�_,-.>�'.`'--tl".�', ,rI I".B-e`"'•ac`:hl'iiwsyti'1�.,,^. -wt.�.,.,-',�_ce�..y�..•a-.M,�y`v.'__��•I+:,.,!.�.t�-wa.,_j...-.��P,j�+',' .`;-1�..".;�e�-�,e...n.�r,•.�`,°6U',�"„.��5^.•s,'re F,�,,{'e+q�ci1„<v1J"yr�,-+—/:� h �i-'-f»•.•,A,_`l{F,' .�'-.�..•1.r:►,:a-.5 yfr- -'./'.�`.r�.�+r Y�,i.rtf.;e:/:e,n f'�m,,„�e-.,=.+,('..�...•..f.rl.,4.x.-'.�'.t-'}�--'*��ay9' �--1 --a-- .!. k,.e�..i.�.,•i..+w"+.«+�•e-— —_"..e�'t,w.=!--^...,.:^..a:e'•'- a.,'.. Y'.�,."' . ��w__•��-t-. r�,��e•,'ek._s'r",_A-'_"xr�+ "..-_'*e�—r"-.-f-'+.h.{-',t-�-X.•{-e._,.e.rr.�+fi.F.„ ��.S't:,_�g_N'`:.a....-�_..—t ry�---��_..-_xs.»tr..v—.�_tw,.6r_yy,*_-•,''I.•'�"."'..^_4-.r�r----_'.,d--. —.•..Y—�-�---.v.<- --,>-��e«.v-''.m.wn•r-.''_,-g',^.yw',.".�_._.^,..,''.- eY_ms--�.--._-�x"•".„i�f."' F.."M`•"�`"4I,,•'aT „ .,•-Y.-..x�!t�esf. �Y,p i."`,�-il�"1r'"s"µ."�..•,�,..a-ar�,+�.'..:1� 7.; •v w a, s'r/.•-�...r..*_s -.v'�a'4a»+V"~Frdw• >->_• � -r„-'-'--.•,.{,--,..'•�:•i et. .N __--"—�,.a•!iIIIIII1iIiiiIIIIwIIIIItIIIIiI sXt ' ' sv♦5r, :r.P•fR,;:r,"�j-"Y Rt�'' r F'.-'mor'r��"• r�•w.�:'.n'k.`o.ei�'_x y. -'tt:..a..."!•._fa'_g'a... t;1 1 IIiIIIiiiIIIIIIIiIIiIiI I IiIIIIIIIII!IiIIIiiIII �'yc�`•.a.r'Sr�'.�i."1•--ti.pti�e�k�_k.,�e`,':�.�r:,�k`t9t'/�ifir� P,.t-�I_re►`REG- :..-�.;r/-ra- I Vr,"-.=�"•.Er,1. 4 _ O- .pp : .- -fl-c.�'^f-.•.,�_-�.�-..��_xr-'g,,T yr: . �--'-.?.`�x.l,:•iI1It�.(I�IIIiIIIIIIIII•V aI • .. —= �1.l,i•, :•Y,--�l,L.,��r�r1�..•i i,-�.. ..a.�r-:te/y.`-”'te..e'1_r3-•tl,. 'c1 •.>_, vT,- .:>•=:•."�r�_-'��-,�. z..r`.�.. fi. . .-a. w—w�•.� , ,1r� , + ' r� `tI .- Oh O 8 0z� 0V�z U 0- z„ C_ O R Y E L L S T R E E T ` � \; _NJt LI C� .-Al-1-16 .,5,I2 �---------T--------- LAMBERTVILLE, NJ 08530VIAR 17 2021 PHONE: 609.397.3635 FZ221"gBoard Of Appeals 2 2 UP L4 ------------, DN. ryQ EXISTING BARN L EXISTING STORAGE W L--------------------------------j EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLANSCALE:1ra"=1-0- EXISTING SECOND FLOOR PLANSCALE:11a'= 1 ~ Tt 3 N0. DATE BY SCRIPTIONDEti REVISIONS OR -77 0 VERIFY ALL F!ELD CONDITIONS AN COMPARE ISTHER PS B ! IY THE CONTRA THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSAtt1SSI NS ANY 0 INCONSISTENCIES COMMENCING.G.ACTES.ERRORS. ,? DISCOVERED SHALL TEL BE REPORTED THE ARCHITECT PROJECT NAF PROPOSED BAfor RN ALTERATIONS a„ j VINCENT BERTAU T 77 95 NA STREET,ORIENT NEW RK 11957 DRAW'NG TITLE na M • NPLAN EXISTING r7DATE C7 DRAWING JOB NO. 1950 SCALE:AS SHOWN DS A-10 BY: EAST VIEW REVIEWED GROCNORTH VIEW (WILLOW STREET) WEST VIEW (FACING WEST) EAST VIEW (FACING NORTH-WEST) ® Y` Ge� T7�� j 3 3 , GARY R. O'CONNOR ARCHITECT, AIA i I Dard 8 CORYELL STREET NJ LIC.AI 11652 ——————— ——————— LAMBERTVILLE, NJ 08530 a_r— —-r-— -- PHONE: 609.397.3635 I I I I I I I i I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I � I I �` 2 ,2 , y I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I l uP I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I \ I I 1 41 [�j E L___ I ! I I i I DN. I 1 I 1 �'— I I 1 I U) I I 1 I I I I I z I I I 1 0 I I j I U I I I i I I I ! 1 I 0 I I EXISTING BARN I I I I 1-1— EXISTING STORAGE I I I I 0 I I qi Z I I I I i I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I ! I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I i I I I i I I I 1 I I I \ L————————————————————————————————J 1 1 EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 14'= -0" EXISTING SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 114• -0N O O I ,.. � . ' •.'-'ate n--r1 y� " r M _ _... moi" --_.-- i ,. - - ----- `--___ _____--.._ � •,.--, NO DATE gw r SCRIPT ION REVISIONS IT IS THE RES ON . i t TO VERIFv ALLFiELD CONCITIOtNS AND COMPARE z_ f HEM VOTH THE CONSTRUCT OIN DOCUMENTS ti f BEFORE COMMENCING..ACT'V TEES.ERRORS_ z OMM,SSIONS OR.ANv OTHER N(CONSISTENCIES DISCOVERED SHALL MINED ATEILv BE REPORTED ., L TO THE ARCHITECT ' PROJECT NAME s r_ 1® PROPOSED BARN ALTERATIONS 4 VINCENT BERTAULT s • -•� - 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 � p,. i,.epi ,,: -.:ti, •. - � ,PQM. = DRkA o T TLE r �.y , - EXISTING SING BAR N PLANS DATE 67.23.20 yy DRAWING N0. .,, e' r+'.vm. .. �•,... r _ ...iw`-. m+ :'mom .r.d-. :`:.,.....r-- a JOB NO. '950 DRAMIN DS SCALE:AS SHOWN A-10 3 BY: — NORTH VIEW (WILLOW STREET) WEST VIEW (FACING WEST) a EAST VIEW (FACING NORTH-WEST) ® EAST VIEW REVIEWED GROC u Fuentes, Kim From: Gary O'Connor <gary@grocarchitects.com> Sent: Friday,June 4, 2021 3:27 PM To: Fuentes, Kim Cc: ebressler@wbglawyers.com;vbertault Subject: Documents Attachments: 95 Navy St Barn Accessory Apt 12.15.20.pdf, 95 Navy St ZBA Area Variance with Approved HPC Updates.pdf;April_23_2021_Bertault IA Sanitary-P-1.pdf; Dec_14_2020 _Bertault IA Sanitary-P-2 .pdf, Dec_14_2020_Bertault IA Sanitary-C-1 .pdf, Driveway Pitch Schemes.pdf Hi Kim, The attached should be the entirety of what you require. On the ZBA Variance Document, I have placed a VOID stamp in red on the drawings that have been superseded by the approved HPC Elevations and those three sheets are now attached to the end of this document. The dates on the revision block match or are the same drawings as approved by HPC. This way the record is intact and complete. The C-1 is the Grading Plan and the two P drawings are the Septic Design and Details. Please let me know if you need any further information. Regards, Gary R. O'Connor, AIA RECEIVED Architect 8 Coryell Street Lambertville, NJ 08530 JUN 4 2021 609-397-3635 Office �ppi✓als 1 609-613-0999 Mobile �zf ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 1 NOTE SITE PLAN INCORPORATES DATAFROM SURVO'r___""RED BY , PECONIC SURVEYORS,P C, - WILLOW STREET GARY R. O'CONNOR SOUTHHOLD NEWYORK11971 ---------__—__—_ EL.4.3' NW28'301IE ARCHITECT,AIA DECEMBER 12,2012 ----------------,----__—__T 6593' EL.5.2' MARCH 02,2020 t;p7 ___ NOVEMBER 23,2020 3 TOTAL OFF - —-- T W 9 2' _ EK', DAMAGED '- STREET PARKING _ - B W 52' WILLOWTREETO I BCORYELLSTREET NY LIC ozDssa BE REMOVED ` I I I / \ LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 , O 3 NEW WILLOW TREE PHONE 6093973635 I I TO BE PLANTED PROJECT DATA N TAX MAP ID 1000-26-01-122 4> 1 TW 68' I 1 1 1 O LOT 92(LOT REFERS TO SUBDIVISION MAP FILED IN SUFFOLK CO T: g W 6 8' ---- -- Oj CLERK'S OFFICE(APRIL 19,2005 AS FILE NO 11245 -- 4'-0'HIGH WDAT FENCE [y- ADDRESS 95NAVYSTREET AT VERTICAL SL ' ORIENT,NEW YORK 11957 I• - ZONING DISTRICT R-40,RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY AA t= EL=7 8 3' O SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE AE-6' (t ' O FROM FIRM No 36103COOSOH 09 25 2009 Z (�(` I T 35_F-- YARD SETBACK_ - h EXIS INC 2STY PRINCIPAL FRAME DWELLING W/ACCESSORY SHED& (y BARN BLDG 1 1 EXISTING 1 112 STY FRAME I PROPOSED p - BARN WI PROPOSED 1 COVERED PORCH EXPANSION&1 STV FRAME ADDITION I I TO PRINCIPALBLDG BEDROOM ACCESSORY N I APARTMENT&1 CAR / -ACCESSEU OBE RY OF SHED FROM STORAGE TO CABANA f ; I GARAGE I PREVIOUSLYAPPROVED VARIANCE I EL.4.9' VERTICAL SLAT FENCE 15' i FLR EL=8 6' 1 -20_ __ ,T W 9 2' SHED AND BARN RELOCATED PER ZBA FILE 6729 6'-0"HIGH HEDGEROW W/ I g yV q g' VARIANCES REQUESTED HIDDEN WIRE FENCING 1 N89056'00,, -EXPANSION OF EXISTING NON-CONFORMING FRONT YARD SEBACK EL 83' YI BW 7BY E 3 e I I ¢lo _-__-DO 54.53' FORPRINCIPALBLDG y• I mim - _,__-)• T W 9 2' -LOCATION OF POOL IN FRONT YARD SHED fi ' p10 EL=783' EL=725' TW 67' ---___ ZONING COMPUTATIONS I 1 QIm EL=67' BW 66' .6.6 ZONING DISTRICT R40 I WIY mIU c/) LOT REQUIREMENTSER QUIREDXIE STING PROPOSED I Qio �I40 MIN LOT SIZE 40,000 S F 19,9055 F' NO CHANGE MIN LOT WIDTH 150 FT 104 FT NO CHANGE C woI N MIN LOTDEPTH 175 FT 207 FT NO CHANGE o�Q EL=783' 1 ON ' ON O PRINCIPAL BUILDING MINIMUM YARD I HT REQUIREMENTS •- I ulm EL=783j 1 !10 ( I Ill REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED RONT YARD 35' 108' NO CHANGE� RECEIVE® IDE YARD 10'(B35' 25') 16B&55 55' 16690, 64'11 EAR YARD 35' 1065' 90' ' } 1 - 35_REAR YARD AX HEIGHT 35 FT 21' NO CHANGE I NEW IN p -_ SETBgC 1 1O'X21' POOL --K FOR_PRINCIPgL BLG 2112 STY 2 STY NO CHANGE 1 — O , jt 1 8 09' -_-1 I 1 A, ARGEST FLOOR AREA(INCLUDING COVERED PORCH 2,001 S F I_li 11.111_ I 1 JU '� 4 20..17 1 qEW BUILDING AREA 613SF ppZ+MIN 5' '- I SHED LOOD HAZARD ZONE AE-ELEVATION-6' ' t"�"T W B 17' NEW STONE - `* 1 XISTING FLOOR ELEVATION 6 5' EXISTING STONE I r'T j B W 7 83' WALL ` HORIZONTAL 1ROPQSFD FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION 8' CURB WALL �< TW 817' 1-I ENLARGEMENT TO Zoning Board of/appeals C^-BW 40' e, BW 70' NI EXISTING HOUSE POWDER %CCESSORY BUILDING(BARN)MINIMUM YARD I HT REQUIREMENTS -~��- SHED ROOM&WET BAR L - - REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED r� NEW CA N I SIDE YARD 15' IT&20' NO CHANGE 4'-O'HIGH HEDGEROW W/ ti - I TOTAL SIDE YARDS 25' 35' NO CHANGE HIDDEN WIRE FEN C o - - REAR YARD 20' NIA NO CHANGE GA +,, -�11 - MAX HEIGHT 22' 19'-4'115 STY NO CHANGE 1 :1�"'" _I.-.a..�r.r .. c 1 RAIN !-}� I FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA 439 S F GARDEN DOWN I 8 09' I SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA 302 S F TOTAL 741 S F<750 S F FR.GAR. I SITE COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED I I I EXISTING DWELLING 9505 F T.W 7 3' I _ -_-_-__ 35 fib' T W 6 6'— 40 64' EXISTING COVERED PORCH 210 S F I B W S 0' I B W B 6' I EXISTING SHED 184 S F. l Y B W 7 0' EXISTING BARN 930 S F. U i DN Io PROPOSED NEW ADDITION 6135F +� i I I 73'< UP I m PROPOSED COVERED PORCH 228 S F I INm I _1.56_6'__ 20__ ____, _6' �a PROPOSED POOL 220SF N c , 10< — 7• I '''' =` O PROPOSED SHED ADDITION 96 S F v I IYz I •. A> i,. Q s.l a'.•':2�!]^`., TOTAL boa PROPOSED I$TY.FRAME +\ •:a' 1�^> ,� DWELLLING 9505 F 613 S F 1,563 S F FR.HSE. 0 1 mo Q ADDITION 613 SO FT r ly i Lot 1 I' PROPOSED FLR EL=8' f 1 { j TOTAL BUILDING AREAS 2,274 S F 1,157 S F 3,431 S F �� <• I 1 T W 9 0' I 2 61 ,��,', 1'•FF `^,4'�^( ^ ALLOWED EXISTING PROPOSED L BW 70 i / � MAX LOT COVERAGE TO% 114% 172% G_ 11 - I T 66' ¢ 'PRE-EXISTING NON-CONFORMING LOT PER SECTION 280-124 �I /—'-' EXISTING I> I I I I I 7 w �I UTILITY I EXISTING Q �h z 1 GARY R. O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA 8 CORYELL STREET NY LIC 020554 LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 PHONE 609 397 3635 \ r �•w 8 A-3 3 12'-2' 94" I I � I I i NEW LIVINGAREA IST FLOOR LIVABLE AREA 439S F OPEN TO BELOW - 12-1-- — — — . — — — rI �I i =I wI NEW KITCHEN �— pppp g�Jnpet. kVT% I VOLUME CEILING BELOW 41 I STORAGE 5'-0_HEAO HEIGHT 15'-0'HEAD HEIGHT _ NEW BEDROOM , 2ND FLOOR LIVABLEAREA_3028 r li NEW ICAR NEW WORKSHOP - GARAGE _ NEWBATHR00�� - __ qi l° ATTIC HEAO HEIGHT JIIIII 5'-O'HEAD HEIGHT 12--1 / 8,_Sva i 5'-10314 / 15'-2— /- 0 NO DATE BY DESCRIPTION A-3 A-3 REVISIONS ITIS THE RESPONSIBUTIY OF THE CONTRACTOR 1 TO VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND C011PARE THEM WTH THE Cq,STRICTIDN OOCNAENTS i 6EFORECOIAIAENCI�G ACTIVliES ERRORS gA'AISJONS Ci ANYOTFER P.CONSISTENVI-S g6COVEREO SMAL o-DIZELY GE REPORTED TOTYE+ACFIIECT j PROJECT NAME j PROPOSED ACCESSORY APARTMENT lar 1 SERTAULT RESIDENCE 95 NAW STREET,ORIENT NEW YORK 11957 j DRAYANG TITLE PROPOSED PLANS DATE 121570 DRAWING NO S F J02 NO 1259 DRAWN DS SCALE AS SHOWN A-Z BY f AML PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE 314•-l'O' PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 114'=1'-0' BY MEWED CROC ' GARY R. O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA 8 CORYELL STREET NY LIC 020554 LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 FLOOR 100'-0' FIMIS Ti RECEIVED TNORTH ELEVATION SCALE 114'=1'.D* WEST ELEVATION SCALE 114- V-0- JUN 4 2021 :EhIling Board of Appeals A. Fil NO DATE BY DESCRIPTIDN REVISIONS TO THE �TECT PROJECTNANE 7, PROPOSED ACCESSORY APARTMENT 77 95NAVYSTREET ORIENT,NEWYORK 11957 DRAMGME . _ � EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / DATE 121520 DRAWING NO `_/ � I r NOTE SITE PLAN INCORPORATES DATAFROMSURVEY G.,=.-v'ItEDBY WILLOW GARY R. O'CONNOR PECONIC SURVEYORS,P C, STREET SOUTHHOLD NEWYORK11971 -----_ EL.4.3' N85°28'30"E DECEMBER 12,2012 --- -------- __ _ 65.93' EL.5.2' ARCHITECT,AIA MARCH 02,2020 1 .` - --— ____ NOVEMBER 23,2020 i 3 TOTAL OFF -—-- T W 9 2' _ DAMAGED '-STREET PARKING - BW 52' y.' WILLOW TREE TO I - 8 CORYELL STREET NY LIC 020554 1 BE REMOVED L 1 1 I / LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 NEW WILLOW TREE PHONE 6093973635 ,f'`�••'�y �-^•-^- - TO BE PLANTED I 3 PROJECT DATA TAX MAP ID 1000-26-01-12 2 �•I TW 68' I 1 I I LOT X2(LOT REFERS TO SUBDIVISION MAP FILED IN SUFFOLK CO Iw BW 68' --_J --- 4'-0'HIGH WD CLERKSOFFICE(APRIL 19,2005 AS FILE NO 11245 AT�•. VERTICAL SLAT FENCE ADDRESS 95NAVYSTREET ORIENT,NEWYORK 11957 tx` EL=7 8 3' p ZONING DISTRICT R40,RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY AA {, SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE AE-6 l FROM FIRM No 36103CO068H 09 251009 Z f; j 35_FRO- O YARD SETBACK h EXISTING.2 STY PRINCIPAL FRAME DWELLING WI ACCESSORY SHED fl o ( I ---- N EXISTING 1 12 STY FRAME BARN BLDG py' 1 I I PROPOSED-COVERED PORCH EXPANSION B 15TY FRAME ADDITION BARN W/PROPOSED 1 _ / I TO PRINCIPAL BLDG IV BEDROOM ACCESSORY p ? I / •CHANGE USE OF SHED FROM STORAGE TO CABANA ` APARTMENT 8 1 CAR c I GARAGE I -ACCESSORY POOL 1 4'-0-HIGH WD C i I SHED AND BARN ROVED LOCATEIANCE. C _ 15' I ,_ FLR.EL=8 6' EL•4.9' VERTICAL SLAT FENCE _ I -20_ _ T W 9 2' SHED AND BARN RELOCATED PER ZBA FILE 6729 6-0•HIGH HEDGEROW W/ 11.1 VARIANCES REQUESTED HIDDEN WIRE FENCING I I BW 4'9 N89'S6'00" -EXPANSION OF EXISTING NONCONFORMING FRONT YARD SEBACK 3, 3-�I I EL=7 83' V I� B W 7 B3' E 54.53' FOR PRINCIPAL BLDG D"----OWN___-� T W B 2, -LOCATION OF POOL IN FRONT YARD yIK EL-7 -�__ EL gW 66, ZONING COMPUTATIONS EL=67' EL.6.6' ZONING DISTRICT R40 0) LOT REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED r.I plo ^I40 MIN LOT SIZE 40,000 SF 19.9055 F• NO CHANGE' I <IN I MIN LOT WIDTH 150 FT 104 FT NO CHANGE �Iv { DN N MIN LOT DEPTH 175 FT 207 FT NO CHANGE P7oIQ EL=783' EL=78` DN . O PRINCIPAL BUILDING MINIMUM YARD I HT REQUIREMENTS 31 {T7 REQUIREDXIE STING PROPOSED FRONT YARD 35' 108' NO CHANGE SIDE YARD 10'(BOTH25-) 166'&55' 166'&4064' REAR YARD 35' 106 5' 90' I NEW IN-GROUND --_35_REgR YARDS MAX HEIGHT 35 FT 21' NO CHANGE 10'X 21' POOL -- ETBACK F_OR PRIN0"l-LG2112 STY 2 STY NO CHANGE 8 09' f -1 LARGEST FLOOR AREA(INCLUDING COVERED PORCHI 2,001 S F 1111_ ~ I NEW BUILDING AREA fi135 F. I SHED FLOOD HAZARD ZONE AE-ELEVATION-6' MIN 5' 1 T W 8 1T NEW STONE I E%(STING FLOOR ELEVATIOk 6 5' EXISTING STONE I "I B W.7 83' WALL HORIZONTAL PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION CURB WALL I T W.D 1T ENLARGEMENTTO < L�'BW 40' F _•tib - BW 70' n EXISTING HOUSE POWDER ACCESSORY BUILDING(BARN)MINIMUM YARD IHT REQUIREMENTS I� 1t^ W.52' D ROOM&WET BAR REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED 1 1 ( '--` G• oEW CABANA AREA.280 SF I SIDE YARD 15 15'&20' NO CHANGE 4'-0'HIGH HEDGEROW W/ - - I TOTAL SIDE YARDS 25' 35' NO CHANGE q HIDDEN WIRE FENCING RECEIVE® [,r I �.•+; � -v _ - � - REAR YARD 20' NIA NO CHANGE GA { .{,1.,�F^�. MAX HEIGHT 22' 19'4'115 STY NOCHANGE RAIN I � FIRST FLOOR LIVINGAREA. 4395E I GARDEN DOWN t9 _ 809 I, Y JUN '��29 SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA 3025f �f TOTAL 741 S F<750 B F FR.GAR. I SITE COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED 1 I I EXISTING DWELLING 950 S F. a I T W 7.3' 35 6fi' T W 6 6' ___ __ 40 64',L_____ I EXISTING COVERED PORCH 210 S F. -- honing Edord of Appeal8 I B W.5 0' B W 66' I I EXISTING SHED 184 S F. .s+.,, IO I - --- - -- - EXISTING BARN 9305E Ix BW 70' �� I I<O j ON =` - =' - I O PROPOSED NEWADDRION 613 S F I I p i 73'< UP I m I PROPOSED COVERED PORCH 228 S F [1 c I m 15 6fi' 20' _6' 1 a PROPOSED POOL 220 S F y I C PROPOSED SHED ADDITION 96 S F O I I�aa 7. I Iii..� .;.-;'lis;=;:..;.:• 1z �I I I Y z TOTAL PROPOSED 1 STY FRAMDWELLUNG 950 Sf 613 S F 1,563 S F FR.HSE: i I a 0 ADDfOSE 613 SO FT a PROPOSED FLR EL=8' I O A TOTAL BUILDING AREAS 2.274 S F 1,157 S F 3,431 S F Lot 1 IT Q ,,,< . �G +• ; I T W 9 0' 2 6T ({7 ALLOWED EXISTING PROPOSED , I z � I'O MAX LOT COVERAGE TO% 114% 172% i I O�I I T66' <Ir 'PRE-EXISTING NON-CONFORMING LOTPER SECTION2B0-124 XISTING I} UTILITY 1 I I W _RR I EXISTING Q -y z I - -y MECHANICAL/ 1rn Q Cn I 00 EXISTING KITCHEN I MUD ROOM D I Q t' I T.W 9 0' I I G ' LB W 7 0' .- 38 lr av ^ I NO DATE BY DESCRIPTION FRONT ((1 2 I IJ v I YARD SETBgCK FOR PRINCIP REVISIONS AL BLDG1.� IrlsrxERESPans®sGnovrNEmN i _ irOBENwEwAr4xEBc0aJsrawscnoN oocvWuENRrsA RE167 „ GARDEN TW7314 sFsoaE caaENdn�AclrmEs Euaou nrtnsvau OR un On+ER mcavvsrwdE s 2 1 oBW 53'- UPdSCOVERFI]SHf11PVIE0WTELYBEREPOfl1E0 fIDA EXISTING 2 STY FRAME HOUSE IDA TO rxEAB;JmEcr PROPOSED FLR EL.e'J `• ;<'�� 0 y''` AVERAGE SET BACK ON NAVY STREET 17.3' PRINCIPLE DWELLING ADDITION 8 ALTERATIONS - (n �—16 6' VINCENTERTAULT BASED ON PECONIC SURVEYORS,P C., 95 NAW STREET,ORIENT,NEW YORK 11957 t J A I PEXPANROPOSED H VE D APRIL 25,2013 avAwc crmE I{A�m228 SO FT - j I -B 6'� O B W 6 6' B W 6 6' SITE PLAN,PROJECT DATA&ZONING COMPUTATIONS 126.23' EL.4.8', t UP Tw s7 DAe u+s10 DRAWING NO ___—_-_-____—_____--_—_____—____ __ ' BW 60' JOB NO *59 BP S82°49'40"W 17.86' S86�18'20„w EL.6.0' SITE PLAN SCALE I'=10'-0' DR SCALE AS SHOWN A_1 NAVY STREET - ---- 85.7 ' -- -------------- DBy RAWN D9 BEwz+EO GROC GARY R. O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA a 3 A-3 8 CORYELL STREET NY LIC 020554 LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 PHONE 609 397 3535 �, //��'�+ga••--w 4'4" 351•8• WALL LEGEND 20'-0" EXISTING WALLTO REMAIN _ NEW WALL DN 0'X 8'-0'DOOR __ _ ---L� • • - _NEW SUMMER ROOM VOLUME CEILING o r7lrm `T " ' I — NEW BEDROOM PA PA x 8=0'X 3'-0'TABLE I �� � I i" r • _ DNr� r-10" / 44 4'-0ti.- e; 6,_2,Ix 1 -T- IN,BATHROOM` �� - _ { r, 2''8" NEW LAUNDRY 0' -NEW UTILITY - - O PANTRY" •PANTRY: `r __ �� ` 1 12-0 -- _ 5-0_0fA.TABL Y�2 I I, _ • _ ,. ,, r �' 11 3.�0 P RY KITCHEN � " - • , 0 I DO Lf UP 2� SDN > DN I I I - • " I 1 DN y EXISTING OFFICE Y - __ +lEXISTING BATHROOM. �5 DNF4 " NEW EXISTING MASTER BEDROOM EXISTING BEDROOM COVERED _ EXISTING LIVING ROOM PORCH 1 _ / Ir/ ' \1 0 DN 0 v v • Q NO DATE BV DESCRIPTION EXISTING COVERED PORCH - - REVISIONS ' RIS THERESPOWBLRIYOFTHECO—OTOR TOYER ALL iR 0C0.vC1OOv5N.00IX9ARE ` r THEAMN,THTHE D0I+STRUC,IONDOCI'I'EMS SUORECOI—CIVG ACTR„ES ERRORS E WNJSS1CN56R_OTHER WCONSISTENCIES ON - - , r - OISCOVEREDSH.Ul9IE01+TELYBE REPORTED 3 1TOThE.RCHITEGT FROIECTNAVE f PRINCIPLE DWELLING ADDITION 8 ALTERATIONS i Iv VINCENT BERTAULT 95 NAW STREET,ORIENT,NEW YORK 11957 EEDA-GTTTLEPROPOSOSEDDPLPLANS DATE 121520 DRAVIING NO JOB 40 1-- ORAW' DS SCALE A SHOWN A-2 BY -- POSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE 11V= PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR/ROOF PLAN SCALE vA=ro 0Y'E"E°CROC I GARY R. O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA EXISTING NEW - <�------,�-- 613-5-F 8 CORYELL STREET NY LIC 020554 u LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 06530 ,5 n PHONE 6093973635 • f F,�^"r ---•-��. 0 OFCUPOLA 124'-3' ---—-------—-—-----—-—---—-----—-�-------—�;�`—-—---—---- TOP O---—-—-- SPECIFICATION OUTLINE TOP OF EXISTING RIDGE HEIGHT 121'-7" _____ '-' p cj:��- ROOF 0(MEAN HEIGHTo OF EXISTING RIDGE 122'-4') -, :_ __ "?�_; _,..,.; ; ...:�_;:'i .� v '>, CEDAR SHINGLES,WEATHER NATURALLY > a^"rte ',:--�-T,'"..�,•„-`,r-r-,—� Wiz,�F;-6 L,°�.`�� m ,-. -�, --------TOPOFNEW RIDGE 120'-LZ SIDING CEDAR SHINGLES,WEATHER NATURALLY "C;`._,` `-�" p F�-`�--._ =z,: Y EXPOSED FOUNDATION REPLACE K-STYLE GUTTERS W/ n _ __ _— —__ _ 3_ SMOOTH STUCCO NEUTRAL EARTH TONE COLOR T B D EXISTING HEIGHT OF TOP PLATE FROM SECOND FLOOR 4'-5° _ .h° I E.i>,, ^rw -- �`;,�" COPPER HALF ROUND GUTTERS ------------—---------- WINDOWS I CUSTOM WOOD WINDOWS TO MATCH EXISTING S D L MUNTIN BARS W!SPACER BAR 52 y y �"=m y 8I — NEW COPPER HALF WALKWAYS $: - - ��yy r " ,„6 ,��i- ), -i-",x «s�" -': ia'�ga i _="T'-r—r�r'SC;-�7=`r=-_ ,,/ ROUND GUTTERS a \� __— __ _�____ _ — _`, _ =_ __ - LUESTONE ORSIMILAR NATURAL STONE g� TFIF asp" �-` I _ (';�" isIV7,11" iL FIRST FLOOR 101'-11" ................ -- •II —TERRACE GRADE 101'4 NW z NEGR '-11" E 00ADE 100 I'T NEW GRAD 1 '11" 'mom 1 FEMA 100 YEAR FLOOD _NAW STREET 100'-0'_ ._. .!.Ki_°s^" �ffi-.v,,"� �.✓.�kc:_ ._. .'•"` _ �'? ,_tea�..3.' � "`vm � @ - ----- ---- --------- - — -« at�> _— — ..�,�, — ", ,� z" "—'_ q,.�'"-7__,_ - - —'—�>—_ fig, V ELEVATION r°. Vis' +.«^ ,5747"7.. <- `; °€ ^r ;� F— ,.. Wil, "�- > rc.1:a.._` _ \ >a, a. ^ '� /.. '=a, T �4 i i . °`, > "' La .`�":y. g .tea^" .'t5-„" yy���� v. w a � `— '' < s. t s "` �" U kx`y- "zs. :y� =W r� :-- �� •Z s «a o`� r> d�. w . s AI. x� .4> "€<` : ",� ^�r""-.' tee r - - y'� v a' Fye '� ' �. „ a %s,9... ' �4 °s^ �. ss�� e$ fr` : `� , >" �..>QF =f ` �, � h`� fr .`` , �ti� ' �. ..^o.�._ .�,..a> - __ _�'- - -�����a�_..�... _ .b _ . .,,�,.,s.«A`3.��� ...�a _ss.Y. .,�.,.0 a"n.�'- __._ , _. . a ma..�..�.ra..� x=>; �� e�w«' � ...o-.aS., t��.,,,L �.a.,�"a-M.���.���,.�,a�^a..�E`�,��1,:u" C/) I - z O U EAST ELEVATION SCALE 114"=1'-0" O O z &TOP OF NEWRIDGE_120'me—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_ C?L3�',_"`�maL=]- y,--!'Lr_• .. rt � A JUN 4 2021 v _ III Zoning Board of Appeals z _ TOP OF NEW BEDROOM RIDGE 113'-7" TL�` '-s HT1— —�{I - "l^ s —�A�Wim`' ..I• � im €_ -'' ` - '• NO GATEBV DESCRIPTION £i�f I �*�°`..,. REVISIONS C C ``fr- rt15 iNE RESPON5IBUnYOFRi GONRRACTOR - $ FIRST FLOOR 101 11 - - - y p rO�wFYAiLNFiD corvomONSANO COMPARE F (8 FLOOD COMPLIANT ELEVATION) -=;� ,tea ��'a'`` THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OOCV1AENis _ ........... ................... . r.rr r,..'.�"➢rw,iwr..y,.�._ -- BEFOREONSCRNGNG iERINCS ERRORS NEW GRADE 100'-11' _ __.._ _ _ r __—_ 'TERRACE GRADE 101'-4" — OMMISSIONS OR PNYOTHER INCONSISLENLIES FEMA 100 YEAR _�- _-T - - -- - - - - - - _—- TOTNEDISC.EREO sHALLURAEOIATECrOE REPORrEO .." ,: —_ _—_ _—_—_—_—_—_—_ —_ — _ _ _ _ —_—_—_—_—_—_—_- TOIHEARCHITEGT ELEVATION,, >F.... ;» ,«"�^r «7��,s;,« y.;��,,;"^ " "-y, ��-..... _— _ —_—--_—_ ._R_-- _—- PROAECTNAVE - --Y v4` bE;^' - `�� ^ ��.- "LE> PRINCIPLE CLING ADDITION L WE 8 ALTERATIONS " '0� `y .e,�`:q`- d 4 eas c g, , N 8 A «e, v � ,Ta`�kc t S, - .� �>� c '� •' ", \� VINCENT ERT ULT �„' 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT,NEW YORK 11957 gg gg p UL ORAMNGTE �# N EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DATE +2+520 DRAWING NO 1D9 NO +=sa DRAWN DS SCALE AS SHOWN A-3 BY s �2 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 114'=1'-0° ByvIEWEO GROG GARY R. O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA NEW EXISTING BCORYELLSTREET f. s73 s F NY LIC 020554 LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 I PHONE 609 397 3635 r TOP OF CUPOLA 124-3" -- ----=-------- ----_- - ---------, -------------------------------- Tl� SPECIFICATION OUTLINE - 1 TOP OF EXISTING RIDGE HEIGHT 121'-7" ROOF TOP OF NEW RIDGE 120'-4' /° �� 1 )^a+ . = ; i,E (MEAN HEIGHT OF EXISTING RIDGE 122-4' I' CEDAR SHINGLES,WEATHER NATURALLY SH ------------------------- 2.t1' SIDING CEDAR SHINGLES,WEATHER NATURALLY 'r= EXPOSED FOUNDATION SMOOTH STUCCO NEUTRAL EARTH TONE COLOR T B D k w WINDOWS a ,� I f "I CUSTOM WOOD WINDOWS TO MATCH EXISTING S D L MUNTIN BARS Wl SPACER BAR " "� " WALKWAYS _ Si Tt: — BLUE STONE OR SIMILAR NATURAL T L• - -- r-¶- ;� _ - k' rr `fit':�` `�Y �,» z I, --�� \�\� -- -- �I� ONE 'ani,-�- 1a` FIRST FLOOR 101'-11' ?;7�,`k`°,-- P^ . -"�''. (8'FLOOD COMPLIANT ELEVATION) CE 101'-4---.------------- 0. TERRA z NAW STREET GRADE 100'-0' " rales`.� ,«i`„ '",•,3„r�, 's " �'M v...,^°*a""d;, °s".aa"`" "? -�'�;� '?r`a'" "r,�a., Vit` 3«>' v'. O 100 YEAR FLOOD ----------=-1`_�� 'ft^'=:•'=�^`n=�•• '�� '-�!'u.d�`r'�SR s:3�'\>s�r ��'4.a �^�';3 �,.;�<=�`-�-"� �ti �`."a........�'..:»..M::i«-:+;�^..,a^^ ------------------- ----«s, -NAW STREET 100'-0" -----ELEVA--TI-- 6' ON,_ — :�. ,a'"' "vim'° a, ca `a a :�- tea.„ �!: `�°, i,�, �'..� �"„• �., y, 3 xb s` eJ Y^� a�, \ 't R, > d fix• � -. :\- 2 .> ..&r .�"c.'2 .•"`.�` �y U) z O U 3�WEST ELEVATION SCALE 114'=T-0' O H O z TOP OF EXISTING RIDGE HEIGHT 121'-7" (MEAN HEIGHT OF EXISTING RIDGE 122-4") i+' Q1v�0y #=..:.,..;.}, �r\�%•G A 77- —_—_—_—_—_—_—_— TOP-—_—_—_—_—_NEW BEDROOM RIDGE 713'-- _ NO GATE BY DESCRIPTION REVISIONS ITIS THE RESPONSIBLITIYCFTHE CONTRACTOR FIRST FLOOR 101'-11" - - , - _ _ 10 VERIFVALL FIELD CONDITIONS ANO 001 NRE e'FLOOD COMPLIANT ELEVATION I I THEN MTH THE CONSTRUCTION OOCVNEW: ( ) BEFORE WHUENOING ACTINTES ERRORS — - -�' TERRACE 101'-4° — —- —---—- —.—-—•—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—•— ONIAISSIONS ORANYOTHER INCON5ISTENCIES -—- i_ NEW GRADE 100-11” olsrovEREo ERA N OTHER INCOBE REPORTED - - - - TO THE ARCNRECT FEMA 100 YEAR FLOOD - NAW STREET 100'-0 `�.r,. _Y�'�^- _ -—__ _-—_____— __ ___—_____—__ __-- —-— -N_AW STREET 100'-0" ' - 6'ELEVATIONI — —_—_— -=a ' PROJECT NNE 7',-'" `« _. PRINCIPLE DWELLING ADDITION B ALTERATIONS V VINCENT BERTAULT 95 NAW STREET ORIENT NEW YORK 71957 - `�' � ''�" Y r`-#" , " ` x , , , A' �yy• � � n .. F ORAVANGTTLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DATE 121520 DRAVINGNO { JOB NO 1E50 CPA= DS SCALE AS SHOWN A-/L BY TT ®SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 714'°1-0' ev11ED DROL GARY R. O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA 8 CORYELL STREET NY LIC.02055, LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 n n PHONE:609.397.3635C'�E.w-�w { Q A,3 far. x I T w �s z o N O O U ti � N ~ z Lu z � O RECEIVED v - - - - -- l VIEW NORTH FROM NAVY STREETVIEW SOUTH -WEST O O JUN 4 2021 1 U- o O = Zoning Board of Appeals z 0- A, - A � Y t, 5. s: r h _ 1' r ND. DATE BV DESCRIPTION �^ REVISIONS rt rs TRE REsraNseumaR THE raNmAcraR THEM SME THTME LONSTRUCTIONDOWOENTS Lq RG.AEITES,ERCOORMl MI5NOHANY OTHER INCDN5RSHALL INREPORTED AR TOTHENiCHITECT E PROl Millq .; PRINCIPLE DWELLING ADDITION 8 ALTERATIONS .tea � d.., '_- ,__ s '" _ ,- rte ,. ' Ia >.- VINCENT BERTAUl7 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT,NEW YORK 11957 GRANWG TIRE PHOTOS WITH MARKERS DATE 12.15.10 DRAWING NO. JOB NO. 1950 DRAWN DS SCALE AS SHS A-5 BY. VIEW SOUTH VIEW NORTH REVIEWED GRDC GARY R. O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA 8 CORYELL STREET NY LIC 020554 LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 PHONE 609 397 3635 4•4" 35'-13" j WALLLEGEND 20'-0" I, _I 15'-8' —— EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN NEW WALL ON - 12'-0 X 8'-0•DOOR I , NEW SUMMER ROOM VOLUME CEILING O O _ /NEW BEDROOM L7 x $,0'X3'-9"TA$LE� DN r t ^;,]UNDR (N)BATHROOM 1 2'-8" NNEW UTILITY Ln 12•-0 ' P s-g-DIA.TABL Ll of KITCHEN ..«"««..« —1— L ...y-..� 4.--a H LL- A-6 DN 0 UP DN I - . � DN m EXISTING OFFICE _ EXISTING BATHROOM N Ll NEW EXISTING MASTER BEDROOM EXISTING BEDROOM - COVERED ' EXISTING LIVING ROOM PORCH - r �l I I I 3a� ' ' 0 031121 DS REVISIONS PER HPC COMMENTARY ' NO GATE BY DESCRIPTION REVISIONS EXISTING COVERED PORCH „ IT 15 THE RESPONSIBLITV OF THE CONTRACTOR x ' TOVERIFY Al FIELD CONDITIONS MO COI FARE TnU,NiTH THE C91SMUCTION 000NIEMS 1 a _ SE ORE CCIAIAENCING ACTMTES ERRORS g1111SSiDN$DR ANYOiHER WLONSISiEN'.IES DN T05THE RCI ONTELLL VNAEDIATEIV BE FEPCRTED '— FROIECT NAME PRINCIPLE DWELLING ADDITION&ALTERATIONS m, 3 VINCENT BERTAULT 35 NAVY STREET ORIENT NEW YORK 11957 4 4 DRAWN.TIRE A-2 A-7 PROPOSED PLANS DATE 1"21520 DRAWING NO i JDeNo is5o DRAWN GS By V SCALE AS SHOWN A_F ""7POSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE VV=V-0-o PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR I ROOF PLAN :DALE u, ByVIEWEG UR�G i GARY R. O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA ' EXISTING NEW e------ 8 CORYELL STREET NY LIC 020554 613SF D LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 /s, ,§ , I o PHONE 609 397 3635 ,t-1-w' - 0 SPECIFICATION OUTLINE TOP OF EXISTING RIDGE HEIGHT 121'-I- '- R ROOF (MEAN HEIGHT OF EXISTING RIDGE 122'-4') =v�i "`�"'�-i_"a�� "i`=z '.,m `ys�� _D TOP OF NEW RIDGE 120'-4" CEDAR SHINGLES,WEATHER NATURALLY ��„ —_—_—_—_—_—_—_—___—_—_—_—_—_—_ _—_—_—_—_ —_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_— ti 3_ E\ SIDING ; , a,-- R k� CEDAR SHINGLES,WEATHER NATURALLY ce' .-'l s,. ,* • --' D r-e•'js_ .�-s,�, �<,°�1'.r::��.f�<4 R ,a.. �.„ ..� EXPOSED FOUNDATION ;€ -f--c. /--` N:'Ei-..aT ;�-'^?�j., 4 REPLACE K-STYLE GUTTERS WJ SMOOTH STUCCO NEUTRAL EARTH TONE COLOR T B D EXISTING HEIGHT OF TOP PLATE FROM SECOND FLOOR 4'-5" .t„ r�{ %� ;,r.1 i-"s"'�c'.sl°I Y-"'-�'1' j `; COPPER HALF ROUND GUTTERS D _ 0------------------------ -a"I a'z.� .r.,"; ''-.1, I. - _ 's`_I�.`=<..ax..,.'�i* ;TxT"I5r t'"a T� E;a< '"le'L,si- `;�-...,�; " WINDOWS CUSTOM WOOD WINDOWS TO MATCH EXISTING S D L MU NTIN BARS W/SPACER BAR �'�,�y,b','` '�`�' ...i...�"t; :w�.-i r-<s r:€t3 ;�..:�.<.'1�� .€ _ ,-=,'��7i..= t„ia•” - a.,z•�.�'_=�-,��, Ei'- "I,�i r-`'�;.,�`r"'s"< 8k\y!. NEW COPPER HALF WALKWAYS ROUND GUTTERS BLUE STONE OR SIMILAR NATURAL STONE �(--i i i [ �+ `�I,�•"`t'- z��g�R _ � �,1 �f f ��� Pdl� � ' IL ;14 � 'ate•>=, �,_ ' �a' II [ � , lis <, I II I! z„VA, s" FIRST FLOOR 101'-11' I .�"F? (8'FLOOD COMPLIANT ELEVATION) I' €a I +', '3`> .T;" �,,f�� . ��".iY'� "ayr4c `� —TERRACE GRADE 101'-4" NEWGRADE100_-11_ •` `i_ 3_r O FEMA 100 YEAR FLOOD �- —-—-—.—-—- - —0 NEW GRADE 10D'-11" ____— _NAVYSTREET 100'-D"___ _ _ —_ _ *>`.�'+�, _ .� � _�_.._,t.,x fix_ _ _._._ _ _. _ -_.= „ ,u'u _ �;';�`9 `��_ ._._ -"'�",'. t.__.t_'�_ 7_1 77,7 .T- �` mar :�a x"a U arc � Hie y il' na , 3 iR`e �pe aM- ° aVyZ rnk", 4\ - x {� <r" LJ. ..x.. " e �x vl �\. n, x..ux � vs�, : -' a\�f" d .». .v r/1 z 0 U Of 1�EAST ELEVATION SCALE 114•=1'-0' 0 u- -- 0 RECEIVED z 1 JU N 4 2021 E Ol SDG0'-4' OP OF NEW RIE 2 —_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_ I II 'Y�rO� ll'1eJ r©G �G'�IIJI IN 11=78 ,bTOP OFNEW BEDROOM RIDGE113'-7'----------------- = "�„^� tT, . g° f "'-+r,-r---•Q— �, 1t`,+- t`7` ,'�+`' ">« )„L,:—rL"s ',{„ ,as•„--q s�.�r- \:-s,€`'ak.M"r �__ ,C I - - '^ +' ROMl` 7 T - �'1 031121 DS REVISIONS PER HPC COMMENTARY Y l < I NO DATE BY DESCRIPTION I�e„+i `sI 5 �I I i_ c. a'i Fa'„' I .'t I o I r i.- __.1__ = T yi. ., .{ -rii , i__ , P, � € J;i.` REVISIONS 3'.: I`��•• I, $ x ' 3 .�„A,e (—_., t-� -' ; ,�a-'', _-1 9 t ITS TRERE5PaV5 TIYDFr CDNr ACTOR FIRST FLOOR 101'-11" ,bL:` 1 `i "'> -*` ""`T' :- a 1i •F -_ -_- g (8'FLOOD COMPLIANT ELEVATION) ;PS,- "l�a"4�`e`p�,sa<°=°7'*° a€ ";'•,,`^`€.`1 Ni"R�,i ..,- ”�` I I1 - __ ,T'€',rgrn 31 'rr -,. ..'I' �"� roEVERFYAUEIEw wmnolnoN ooaivis 2,!`a !" A- `3 R,`.`.. _ v e'^-'e =YT- ,rLo<`4" A,�e' a3.t'w'('„ i<'f� •.........•—.—.—...—.—•—...—. - c..I� 1••:•.'.� +•• •-TERRACE_GRADE 101'-4:WeevoRE wuMEr+anc.ncnHTEs,EwtoRs ' NEW GRADE 100'-11' _ a SVONSo ANYOTHe CCNSISr NCIES } _ _ _ - _ __ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ r' - _ __ _ _ _1^ - _ — _ OI—VERFD SHA l—DIATELYBE REPORTED FEMA 100 YEAR FLOOD 1` _ + n _ 1- _ _ _ _ _ -1 _ _;.r`~_ - TOTHE3 ECT 1 V ELEVATION ':..�_ `x;� "-4>< _ PRaccT N,+nIE _-?^ -�` ".�` .F PRINCIPLE DWELLING ADDITION&ALTERATIONS >�� � \ Tom. =\ �r -Y 5` �v T VINCENT BER AULT w r3 ..k Na” 7 N 7 e� 95 NAVY STREET ORIENT, EW YORK 1195 - ... .« ...^..>.,. ..x.. ,..<..°..,,.,.,,..... IXVAVANGTIRE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS F lDATE 121510 DRAMNG NO JOB NO 1950 DRAWN OS SCALE AS SHOWN A-6 8Y 2 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 114-=T-0 - RE GROG GARY R. O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA NEW EXISTING____ 613 S F �� , 8 CORYELL STREET NY LIC 020554 LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 /T PHONE 609 397 3635 SPECIFICATION OUTLINE ____ TOP OF EXISTING RIDGE HEIGHT 121'-7" ROOF (MEAN HEIGHT of EXISTING RIDGE 1224) CEDAR SHINGLES,WEATHER NATURALLY TOP OF NEW RIDGE 120'-4' _ _ SIDING, CEDAR SHINGLES,WEATHER NATURALLY EXPOSED FOUNDATION ,_a4 '„ [[I SMOOTH STUCCO NEUTRAL EARTH TONE COLOR T B D 'T.",i,.4_€ WINDOWS yr•' ��'=`=—�_ " '_ �{"�:""�-�"�=`v;-- "�'w;�;� �„'�„;�:='?„-�- ," ` I �e", e}�.�( � �.,;, I I�� CUSTOM WOOD WINDOWS TO MATCH EXISTING S D L .��I _i -,--� =;11�r_"x,'` ,T;' ,• I-.%-", .f- r 'Tf*',�+F.1'. % IIS s""£ 1"° ,sP:+ I� �'x>T I$a�,i 6_ �a MUNTIN BARS Wl SPACER BAR - �,� __ WALKWAYS ' ' , z',,a•items _ t °,, ,' a+3:? 0t T T_, '", _--- ;'` — BLUE STONE OR SIMILAR NATURAL STONE ;; a„ V<. „'P�h ` ; (=j'1"u, i - 'wi! _. •�. ! „A j=,`€.i4, t11 , ` VIII- �'i',"r` P-"'��.• -..T. `1'x "a I-�r' i x1.,., 2. "'� § FIRST FLOOR 101'11' COMPLIANT.LEVATIO TERRACE 101.3'°.—.®.—.—.o.—.—.®.o. ' o o.o.v.o... o _ . . . 58 -—-—-—- z NAW STREET GRADE 100'-0' - - - -- ......- .. ..:.`;tag_,. eke =-:.. .._,�^s —. — -- ------_---- -----NAW STREET 100'-0"---- 6'ELEVATION_ pie �,1"x rvY� "F` a r^,�, ->� _"0T " S aFY" w' _ 3 U a°3 `v" . -3 "x a LJ_ KF � �x<x 1" se" >tf., ,.w>.>"Lw.. - .a.....>.x..>..�«zw_a+>_...+.. ..ne.-w_ ...w...a `�'_.....ua�+..>., _-...-......__.v... --........�..-.W......... ....w.., ,..�w.-wwa. ."3 Z O U Elf 30 WEST ELEVATION SCALE 114•=P-D" O O TOP OF EXISTINGRIDGE HEIGHT 121'-7' (MEAN HEIGHT OF EXISTING RIDGE 122-4") I —_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—TOP OF NEW BEDROOM RIDGE 113'-T� k;. ;, , .,� T s' tat„,a;�.3 "�' 'i f ~ r, _ _ twu�`,--="�=,�.•-'' `.''+ -r-=-'-.I— r�� _ _ _ iE r�> IIE I' r"- 113` °rI ` s' — y ` I I 03 1121 OS REVISIONS PER HPC COMMENTARY C' L .1 ''P NO DATE BV DESCRIPTION REVISIONS CISTHERESPON WTIYOFTHEWNTRACTCR FIRST FLOOR 101'-11 I , - TOVERr-FIRD—DITION—DCOPPARE _ z � + `_ $d, a " HEM—THE=STRIILTION DONMENTS (e'FLOOD COMPLIANT ELEVATION) IT: +� �,%,€g' aEFDa<ccuuENnNc ActmTEs ERRORS --------- TERRACE 101'-4-----�"""""' � t ��- ' -�H" �������-—-—-—-—-—-—-— —-— CIAMISSIONS OR PNY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES l NEW GRADE 100-11' clsroVEREDSHuL—EDIXTEEYEEREPORTED -- ---------- _ TO THE AR:NRECi FEMA 100 YEAR FLOOD NAW STREET 100'-0 -'E v--- - ;�_F-..y Ism _-- ---- ---- - _-- - --' --- - -- NAW STREET 100'-0' 6 ELEVATION e e e e e PRINCIPLE DWELLINGADDITION8 ALTERATIONS VINCENT fiERTAULT 95 NAW STREET,ORIENT,NEW YORK 11957 DRAW{y('i 1rtLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DATE 121520 DRAVING NO JOB NO 1959 DRAWN DS SCALE AS SHOWN A-7 BY ®SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 114'=1-0 evuEWTc CR'C W GROUND FLOOR 6'-0" U ABOVE FLOOD PLANE ELEVATION 4.7' 12 25'-0" w pQ 13UILDING AT 25 0 BACK FFOM ROAD 5CALE: 3/IG" = 1 '-0" so RECEIVED o 00 JUIN 4 2021 O o z Zoning Board ofAPPeclls a - ---- O 5 Uw O � � N ,, 00 0 � 3.11.2014 A-1 EXHIBIT G NOTE SITE PLAN INCORPORATES DATAFROM SURVEY PREPARED BY PECONIC SURVEYORS,P.C, WILLOW STR—REET�—�- —� - GARY R. O'CONNOR SOUTHHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 --—--—--—_ EL.4.3' N85°28'30"E m! EL.5.2' ARCHITECT,AIA DECEMBER 12,2012 MARCH 02,2020 ---------------------,1j-- I--�---- � _ 65.93' NOVEMBER23,2020 �'s;� PARKING I I ------------ TW 92' RECEIVED t,J SPACE I -'a W 5 2' SW 52 8Co ryell Street NY LIC D20554 ' 1 Lambertville,NJ 08530 1 i L S Phone 609 397 3635 f\0"— v I NEWWILLOWTREE I I/� ^/1 •'I I I J /�- -I O TO BE PLANTED JUN COLI , NI DRIVEWAY L ,/ PROJECT DATA TAX MAP ID 1000-26-01-122 F f Zoning Board of Appeals LOT#2(LOT REFERS TO SUBDIVISION MAP FILED IN SUFFOLK CO N UP : 8 4 -- 4'0'HIGH WD CLERKS OFFICE(APRIL 19,2005 AS FILE NO 11205 VERTICAL ADDRESS 95NAVYSTREET ALIGN FRONT OF WALL T W 80 ' 7 83' a 4 PICKET FENCE ORIENT,NEW YORK 11957 WITH FRONT OF BARN ZONING DISTRICT,R40,RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY AA ' 8 W 6 3' EL=7 83' x' O SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE AE-6' °1. O FROM FIRM NO 36103CO068H 09 252009 t 35_ -FROYARD SETBACK ll� EXISTING ACCESSORY SHED 8 BARN BLDG z __--1 EXISTING 1 1/2 STY FRAME 1 I BARN WI PROPOSED 478 11 cr) CHANGE USE OF PROPOSED-CHANGE OF USE N I SO FT ACCESSORY , -ACCESS RY POOLHED FROM STORAGE TO CABANA. O APARTMENT ACCESSORY CAR GARAGE I 4-O'HIGH WD VERTICAL PREVIOUSLYAPPROVEO VARIANCE 'v I ' I PICKET FENCE SHED AND BARN RELOCATED PER ZBA FILE 6729 15' FLR EL=86' 1 20' EL-4 9' VARIANCES REQUESTED 6'-0"HIGH HEDGEROW W/ 1.`n, I - TW 92 HIDDEN WIRE FENCING I I BW 7 83' B VV 4 9• N89° -LOCATION OF POOL IN FRONT YARD 56'00° 3, tvJ I EL=7.83' VI49 E 54.53 ZONING COMPUTATIONS I ao DOW TW 92' SHED }� 0g EL=783' EL 25' W 72, ---- ZONING DISTRICT R40 of YIU, ¢IW BW 72' LOT REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED EL.6.6' MIN LOT SIZE 40,000 S F 19,905 S F' NO CHANGE y I Elm y I¢ c/) MIN LOT WIDTH 150 FT 104 FT NO CHANGE MIN LOT DEPTH 175 FT 207 FT NO CHANGE 4 SIN PRINCIPAL BUILDING MINIMUM YARD I HT REQUIREMENTS * } I yIw , N REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED t olU EL.783' 1 O FRONTYARD 39 108' NO CHANGE EL=783" � SIDE YARD to-(BOTH 25') 166'855' 166'&4064' a { I O , REAR YARD 35' 106 5' 90' I MAX HEIGHT 35 FT 21' NO CHANGE L--__ 2112 STY 2 STY NO CHANGE • I NEW IN-GROU -35-RSR YARDS LARGEST FLOOR AREA INCLUDING COVERED PORCHI 2,001 S F Yr 1 I 10'X21• ND POOL - - BACK F_OR_PRINCIPgL BLG NEW BUILDING AREA 613 SF ' 809, ---, FLOOD HAZARD ZONE- AE-ELEVATION-6' 1 0 1 I .^1111' I I EXISTING FLOOR ELEVATION. 65' "MIN MIN 5' --- I SHED PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION t TW 817' I ACCESSORY BUILDING(BARN)MINIMUM YARD I HT REQUIREMENTS EXISTk 1 B W 783 NEW STONE HORIZONTAL REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED CURB'WALL NG ONE I + WALL TW v ENLARGEMENT TO , SIDE YARD 15' 15'820' NO CHANGE 8 1T EXISTING HOUSE POWDER to I'-�gW 40 h 4 ' - _ BW T o ^I„�ED ROOMBWET BAR TOTAL SIDE YARDS 25' 35' NO CHANGE -�-" �' `:��,�„ "g W 5 2 NEW CABANA REAR YARD 20' NIA NO CHANGE AREA 280 SF. 4'-U*HIGH HEDGE ~ _ I MAX HEIGHT 22' 19'4'115 STY NO CHANGE '� -J FIRST FLOOR ACCESSORY APARTMENT AREA 478SF I HIDDEN WIRE FENCING ,r-+��---.a-, --L, ,_ _ 1 I oL,j+,M'-�,�t� TOTAL 478SF<7508F GA I IRAIN I SITE COVERAGE, EXISTING PROPOSED GARDEN < DOWN 809, 4' 1 4 42't 5' 6' EXISTING DWELLING 950 S F I EXISTING COVERED PORCH 210 5 F FR GAR. 1 I EXISTING SHED 1945F 1 I I EXISTING BARN 930 S F T W 7 3' I TW 73' TW 66' I PROPOSED NEW ADDITION 613 S F I B W.5 0' I B W 5 251t BW 66' I PROPOSED COVERED PORCH 228 S F l Y BW 70' 'F;•, I O PROPOSED POOL 220 SF U c0 I ON 35 66" 4064' I PROPOSED SHED ADDITION 96 S F 1 Imo UP s 66' m 1 1566, w m 7 3'< I TOTAL I o< 7 3 1 20' IF I v DWELLLING 950 S F 613 S F 1,563 S F N 1 IO:a 13 O 1 ca 4 ��. I}Z " � �"^K;t � ;<f o_<, �,>:<,-�."•QS TOTAL BUILDING AREAS 2,2745E 1,1573E 3,4315E 1 PROPOSED I STY FRAME ALLOWED EXISTING PROPOSED I m ADDITION.613 50.FT ^i�- =� Ul FR.HSE. I Io0 L=B'PROPOSED FLR EMAX LOT COVERAGE 20% 114 72h ` ^ U v Lot 1 I I ;'I m'_" PRE-EXISTING NON-CONFORMING LOT PER SECTION 280-124 N = W 90' - I< Z�I W 7 0 EXISTING 6 6' 1} y. I rn I ,' UTILITY I I ,w,53 0 7 1 7 0 �I -RM I EXISTING Q IN Q t ^ -I MECHANICAL/ MUDROOM 061021 GS MODIFIED PARKING&I LEVEL APARTMENT LAYOUT EXISTING KITCHEN N - NO GATE BY DESCRIPTION I T.W 90' I I L--- 'y/77 - <.; „1 REVISIONS BW 70' I -38'--'----- IU v I 35_FRONTYARD SETBACK FOR BLDG I� OISTNE RESPONS1DMY OFTNE CONTRAcr°R 7 I - -,..7 r°wuFYAiIREm mrsmONS ANO coMPAI:E 167'^ rxEraWO MCONSMUCTIONOMMwrS TW 73-1 F_ GARDEN 8EFO�COMMENGNO.ACTMIES ERRORS 1 SJSTNOIES B W 53', UP m14' TOSTHEARGQIECT IIRAEOAiE1S9 E1ORi PRmEGT 0 j N� ----1 PROPOSEDACCESSRYAPARTMENT EXISTING 2 SN FRAME HOUSE rrc I PROPOSED FLR EL=8') AVERAGE SET BACK ON NAVYSTREET 173' BERTAULT RESIDENCE Lam-16 6' BASED ON PECONIC SURVEYORS,P C. 95 NAW STREET,ORIENT,NEW YORK 11957 '• II I PROPOSED COVER D APRIL 25,2013 I I I I PORCH EXPANSION DRAMO TIRE i I zza sQ FT Q COVER SHEET,PROJECT DATA&BUILDING STANDARDS TW 67'1 1 126 23' EL.4.8'i SPACE G ' 6 B W 6 6' U B W 6 6' TW 67' GATE 12.1520 CRAVING NO i -----_---_--_—__----------------- ---_.•-__-- N -- ---_-- --_ ------_-- UP _ 778' ' BW 60' JOB NO 1950 f S82°49'40"W 17.86' NA� S ; EL=6.0'— SITE PLAN SCALE 1=10-9 BY DS scAEA s5 HOWN A_1 STREET sss°18'zo"w __-- ---- - -- 85.71' -—-' RENEWED 1 BYGRO'C SIVE® — JUN 2021 EXHIBIT B �orain9 Board of 'appeals GARY R.O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA 8 CORYELL STREET mucawssr IANBERTVILLE NJ 08530 n PHONE 8093973635 ------------- ^��___ ❑ 111 1 ❑ ' T- - I I I I I 6SLES54A�dPyiNlNEm i ----- � wAeuANEA.neu. � v9yueSiB, I i � 4 �u" YI / VOLUYE S€N�NNBEL4YL I N6'!ffit�EH ' h _ - i------\-j rS]gUGE ------------------ ':7y �11 Rvl, I NEW,CMBMABE � 1 , I �I T I t t •zc t a� \ aunn ua�PeanWeawrt�atAwr \\ are ;d'xC9=Rx REVISIONS Na>Ertcx PROPOSEDBCGEe ORYAPARTUEM BERfABL1AEMEKE 0 NAW STREET OWExf IEIIYOW!„BS) ;NHiC4p PROPOSED PIANS A+R JL319_. Pt+MSR 1 - - ----- - - - - �__ A-2 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN su E,M.ru - PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR FLAW___ N”,� ` EXHIBIT A - Gary K. O'Connor R`_ARRCO`17 1' ARCHITECT, LLC -- DN 102 North Union 5creet —_ Lambert"MIc N.05530 "L'C 020554 J -CP PL'SE'2'-C 6 97 3635 d{ IE)RE5TROOA4 � 11, I III 111 II III 1111 II II I',II III',II 1' 1 „ II, �L i� II 1 II SII�I PE[VIOL'SAPRON SItdIL P AP O; EO'JAL TO GRA-1.5PAVE28Y DVED �.ECE INVI51BLE 5TP,UGURE5,'WC GROUND FLOOR O'-C' ___ I Ii nili n'I'n'll'I� lil, �a�l�i l 11 1 ii I' 1 ,,, �`u I' u / (ELEVATION80) I JUN J STUCCO FINISH W/ 1'0 EARTH TONE COLOR EAST ELEVATION v SCALE /G°=I'-0" '70HIn G �1 9 hoard FRONT ROOF I d'•9'� ----------------------- L--- L——— II I TOP PLATE 12'-0 s I I II a 'III I I I I III It 1111 1 I'll 11,11 Ill I If H, I'll 11111 Hit 11 ll 1 1111 I'll ITH 11IT11 Ill [Ill 11 it If 1111 11 Hill it Ili (��SE�COND FLOOR 6'-0 n" IT11 IMI 11 1 1 1111 till fill Ililt IIIIH Ill Ill 11 11 if 11 11 V ------------ Nil Iltil Hill II L ill''Ill''Ill''Ill''Ill Hill I I It"ill I I'll Ill III "till Hill IIHII 111111 111111 111111 ul GROUND FLOOR d-0' III 111 1 11 1 1 1 a�I n l u 1 n II III II n u t II n n u III II (ELEVATION 8 0') 1 I STUCCO FINI511 W1 WEST ELEVATION SCALE 114'=11" EARTH TONE COLOR !� =—=9— — L 25'-0' r--------------- � I DARN FLOOR PLAN 5CALE 114"=V-0° 1 I I I I I (E) DETPCf1ED —SHED I I 1 I FRONT ROOF 18'_9•± rT REAR ROOF 17- ---- - I I I OF°'I 1/14 G9 RR DINNER REv^Ut51 V.ILLDIY1REE lO REMAIN I I 0526'1: :,, MODIFIED PER BOARD O`ADJ�Tr.IE,�T APPROVAL I I I u I 01/21/14 C5 MCWDEPYOTOLDCAPON5 11 WEST ELEVATION RD DATE BV DESCRIPTION TOP PLATE 12'-0 I I SCALE 114'= I'-0' REVISIONS 11111 till I �,n l --BUILDING HT 12'J'`—� cosP�rr ctL FEIDtOD 11 1 'I I, III _—�. ______ �LI.S;.V156_CP�GChMEYGM1�NF.:.'TCR I I I I ni ill L__ J cPTFE ro II I T1.5,-I" O Y Z D1710�N'D xE Th MWiH TnE CONSRULTICt. II u I 5ECOND FLOOR B'-0 1 I° Acmara, FLOOR PLAN N�GSTLN PS°OCGVZ YKA.L :C , I 11 II II 1'�11 II I 1 -_ 1/4'=I'-0' 'PAECf RSJ;E / I I` "II` I' `�'11' 1 I'I I ,L PROPOSED BUILDING RELOCATION It 11 11 1 / \ 1, i, IIIi1 ,,�Ilniiu I I �IIII I �II��,�r,n BMEW,N 11957 OPJENi.NY 11957 I I GROUND FLOOR 0'-0' ''1'l l i' !'lieu n 1 DuNmis P1E PLANS<ELEVATION5 PERVIOJ5 APRON 54dILAR OR EQUAL TC _I GRA557AVE2BYINV515LE5TRUCTL'RE5INC { DAie Io,16�1� :Rnvnncrc SOUTH ELEVATION I I I I Jcs NORTH ELEVATION 5-CAU! 1/4ISOUTH ELEVATION 5CALE 114 '.0 KANNo D5 _ S43SD 3� i I 1 _ EXHIBIT C NOTE SITE PLAN INCORPORATES DATAFROM SURVEY PREPARED BY — -- — --f--� Y R. 0'CO N N 0 R PECONIC SURVEYORS,P C, WILLOW STREET SOUTHHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 ------__------_---_---_----- EL.4.3'— m / EL.5.2' ARCHITECT,AIA DECEMBER 12,2012 N85'28'3011E I _ 65.93' i ,l`j'�� ,I MARCH 02,2020 t'. �----1--T----�---______— NOVEMBER23,2020 1 I I ----- tJ ��:'•_/'__J l`/ c .J it PARKING T W 9 2' � "- I j I --_B W 5 2' 8 Coryell Street f" SPACE I i i j \ e w s 2' l ` 1 Lambertnlle,NJ 08530 NY uc DZD554 , lri , 1 i J O 1 NEWWILLOWTREE W ��I� 20211 Phone 6093973635 .E rI l I I TO BE PLANTED v' ;2I 12, 1 �_� / DRIVEWAY 1 PROJECT DATA I MAP ID 01-122 p; (pry----- r--- TAX#2(LOT EFER-TOSU [J 1 LOT p2(LOT R'cFER5 TO SUBDIVISION MAP FILED IN SUFFOLK CO sy UP - 'B 4' -�- 4'-0'HIGH WD O CLERK S OFFICE(APRIL 19,2005 AS FILE NO 11245 ,rl VERTICAL f ADDRESS 95NAVYSTREET ALIGN FRONT OF WALL7 83' 8 4 PICKET FENCE WITH FRONT OF BARN �'( T W.8 0' - OZONING C'STRRIENT,NEW YORK 11957 BW 63' EL=783' ' O SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE AECT R40, IA6LOW DENSITY AA 1 O FROM FIRM No 36103C0068H 09 25 2009 j 35_-- YARD SETBACK - UOj EXISTING ACCESSORY SHED&BARN BLDG I EXISTING 1 112 STY.FRAME , N PROPOSED-CHANGE OF USE BARN W/PROPOSED 478 1 -CHANGE USE OF SHED FROM STORAGE TO CABANA N SO FT ACCESSORY -ACCESSORY POOL O ,,,,i I APARTMENT 81 CAR I PREVIOUSLYAPPROVED VARIANCE GARAGE I 4'-O'HIGH WD VERTICAL `x I 1 PICKET FENCE SHEDAND BARN RELOCATED PER ZBA FILE 6729 15' I FLR EL=86' _ 1 2D, EL.4.91 VARIANCES REQUESTED TW 92' 6'-0'HIGH HEDGEROW W/ �" I - -LOCATION OF POOL IN FRONT YARD HIDDEN WIRE FENCING 3 � ( EL=7 83' U B W 7 83 BW 49' ; N89°`!j6100„E i1 I m,O _ DOWN 54.53' ZONING COMPUTATIONS I fel m '- -.--_, TW 92' SHED ;"yEL=7 83' EL=7 25' W 72' ------ ZONING DISTRICT R-40 0,gyof +1--. Y10 QIW Bd7 2' 1 LOT REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED 6 eJ1U EL.6.6 MIN LOT SIZE 40,000 S F 19 905 S F' NO CHANGE ,�V'F I mlm 0 1¢ (n MIN LOT WIDTH 150 FT 104 FT NO CHANGE MIN LOT DEPTH 175 FT 207 FT NO CHANGE 0l0 ILL '--� PRINCIPAL BUILDING MINIMUM YARD I HT REQUIREMENTS {I I jI LSV- REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED l I WO I0 EL.-783' I O 11 FRONTYARD 35' 108' NO CHANGE f” I NIS EL 83', STI SIDE YARD 10'(BOTH 25') 166'&55' 166'&4064' #} I F.0 1 REAR YARD 35, 1065, 90, I 1 _ MAX HEIGHT 35FT 21' NO CHANGE 21G STY 2 STY NO CHANGE NEW IN-GROUND REAR YARDS LARGEST FLOOR AREA(INCLUDING COVERED PORCH 2,0015 F /}'•; 10'X21- POOL --- ETBACK F_OR_PRINCIPgL BLG NEW BUILDING AREA. 613 S F oc I I 8p FLOOD HAZARD ZONE AE-ELEVATION-6' iv i �-'-'-- , EXISTING FLOOR ELEVATION 6 5' n`I I SHED PRO POSED FIN ISH ED FLOOR ELEVATION `o TW 817' I\ I ACCESSORY BUILDING(BARN)MINIMUM YARD I HT REQUIREMENTS EXISTING STONE I,i°+4 B W 783' NEW STONE HORIZONTAL REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED -- L WALL ENLARGEMENT TO SIDEYARO 15 15'820' NO CHANGE CURB WALL i?°' - T W 8 17' -I EXISTING HOUSE POWDER 40' •,�-, -K A. - I BW o°1I TOTALSIDEYARDS 25' 35' NO CHANGE 7 SHED ROOM 8,WET BAR '1 '"T`^'-`- ;,,,,'•`.B W 5 2' NEW CABANA REAR YARD 20' NIA NO CHANGE --^-»....t.�t,:" ^I AREA 280 SF I MAX HEIGHT 22 19'-0'115 STY NO CHANGE 4'-0'HIGH HEDGEROW W/ FIRSTFLOOR ACCESSORY APARTMENT AREA 478S HIDDEN WIRE FENCING �,4f�, -,•i v .� - I •F--= _ - rL, -- TOTAL 478SF<750SF � r 1 RAINjam.-y I 1_8SITE COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED GARDEN DOWN ^ 09, i EXISTING DWELLING 950SF 4' I 4 42'1 5' 6' Y ,I , EXISTING COVERED PORCH 210 S F FR.GAR I EXISTING SHED 184 S F 1 I I EXISTING BARN 930 S F T W 7 3' I TW 73' TW 66' I PROPOSED NEW ADDITION 613 S F B W.5 0' I B W 5 25'1 B w 66, , PROPOSED COVERED PORCH 228 S F 1 I PROPOSED POOL 220 S F s I i Q O BW 70' I pry 35 66' 40 64' t o PROPOSED SHED ADDITION 95 S F 1 I�m I 73,<_UP _- 66' la I w _ 156 ,/I_ 20___ I°' DWELLLING TOTAL N I I a 7 3� "I•}, I'- I Z 950 S F 613 S F 1,563 S F � 1 I>z '•� "-4" �'" 274SF 1.157SF 3,431 SF Iwo: 1 v r}, -4a`.,�`"',°,it`-�Z TOTAL AREAS 2, -I '; I I LL I PROPOSED 1 STV FRAME .'i la: "� ---� ALLOWED EXISTING PROPOSED cq? 1 rn ADDITION fi13 50 FT - "^ILL " CT FR HSE. I Ib0LL s MAXLOT COVERAGE 20% 14% 172% PROPOSED FLR EL=8' i I v \ ,� 'A y Lot 1 1 w „Im ,4 _ PREEXISTING NON-CONFORMING LOT PER SECTION 280-124 g I 7' Q W 70' ,nl -�' -- EXISTINGI I 66' li UTILITY I ,w 0 � EXISTING153 Gm, 77 1 z CI _I y MECHANICAL/ Q/� "s UI oO i EXISTING KITCHEN � .G � MUD ROOM D �' Q Bb 1021 09 MODIFIED PARKING 87LEVEL APARTMENT LAYOUT I T.W 9 D' I N NO DATE BY DESCRIPTION /7 I REVISIONS 431=------+` 7 �J 35_FRON7 YARD SETBACK FOR PRINCIPAL BLDG, rt ISTPE RESPCNSlMYOME CONTRACTOR v I ¢p m ` Cr4ar 1 I Z 1_<1"` - - TGVEJMTHA ECONSTRomONSAND CDMPARE 7 tHEL mlx THE coxsmucllox DownEJ+Ts j/16 T' mono GARDEN B FORE CGMIAENONG AC N ES ERRGRs 3 T W 7 3' _ _ 14_ OMI OI EANB VR IMTHERINCONSISTPORTE 2 1 -B W$3'� UP i _ OnOU�DQE`INIAEDIAiELYBE REPORTED ,^ % PROJECT NAME a _ PROPOSED ACCESSORY APARTMENT 1 I I I EXISTING 2 STY FRAM I HOUSE `•~,0 I PROPOSED FLR EL=8') AVERAGE SET BACK ON NAVY STREET 17 3' BERTAULT RESIDENCE m I I ! Ler-16 6'-r® K Q BASED ON PECONIC SURVEYORS,P.0, 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT,NEW YORK 11957 ' APRIL 25,2013 -/ ''z I I I PROPOSED COVERED -PORCH EXPANSION oRawwclmE 228 SO FT 0 COVER SHEET,PROJECT DATA&BUILDING STANDARDS r TW 67' 1 I PARKING I 6' Il' DATE 12fa.49 DRAWING NO 12623' EL.4.8'1 SPACE L ( UP T W 6 7' _-__- __-__-_- v 778' BW 60' JOG NO i950 I S82°49'40"W 17.86' I °P ----- _ _ I EL.6.0' SITE PLANSCALE 1'=10'-9' DRAWN DS SCALEAASSHOWN -------- �.�___-_ A-1 NAVY STREET S86°181201N p B" 85 71' __ �----- R=VI=NED By GROL EXHIBIT B GARY R.O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA 8 CORYELL STREET nvLlGat0.551 LAUSERMLLE,NJ 08530 PHONE 609 397 3635 ral Fol {� •N2' i 8TN€g --- wAaLPAREAaeaF } _—_—_— I7 gw�u6 I 1 i r NEtYNnartN � � f ,.d,- ; YWu4E4E6E0i6EL24 ; I ! SAI/ I NEilwMANADE 4 I I I ,p o \ � euri�RNll'VCT++IIP J I RE415bN5 1 '' dwu�mrff Nuac,xxz I PROPOSEDACCESSORYAPMTNENT BERTAVLIRES®E BS NAW 6IREET,ONEM NMlEWYONN,1051 tbm9#tY L PROPOSED PLANS A9Aq .JF4.�. � � SxEAy p� A-2 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN sG E,R=,o PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN PRscue,R•-,c 1 I Revisiom 06-13-97 04-01-99 59 k-1703 04-0 110 t 4 n T_1r12 H S 3 6 �s • �r�a 8 sn \, l 9 \ k.,SbE8 }24�SPEC' CL N4 04-25-05 -01-07030 025-04-0119 nt 01-28-08 ;?Q., d \ ��'(� �1V-�� u a• Z 1 09-17-15 Z ♦ m 'x 9 05=24-19 y. \01 13 ys ' 4 \\5 \ ro W 12.2 a •P s _ "° ", ro P j M it S 12.1 • se r 3 y �C�s'i �\ ♦ �E , .,as 32.1 J25 29 30 � vac 28 Add s. e � ra � 1x n 21 's' 27 1>! ♦ ... +� 37 �♦ 18 sa 26 ,% '♦. .i '..35 39.i _^ 23 t i 22 a ,4 d to A9 0* 1' 20A is o. 30.12 � l e 3 p - 4A 3910 s 39 V pR mc" ` ♦ W #44, J b. 1v --, r 22 Mwjj�, h ; c cz " Q 1 a a" r � F ' v � r� ♦ � .f �Dt S a E .REEw rrew, foliowwc ws� Rncs E scrag z „ AURuIARCE \senrtl —A— _ ebam. Z s�o••e —.ZZ_ o.....,., u�A(41w rz.u\ \\\��L Ci ff1E 15 —_i — — RANI —— — — O .e w� 1� -----.-- enu..muae 12.1 A(C) N D