The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About7467 V 1+q ce4l+, T alls,SF OrT y rA) 744 7 A,di'f'6 ns cam( 4A #a n ext ch mi an M cghs�xch& or 14* 1-3;jQcel swam rof aae 92, • )()W See c2 rtj �4 lrt ke b/3/a,(11/34 6m/%;FAysh en l' 21 duyeA(,- :. Slc,.rhnw& f t 0 ..� ... �. .r. .•V 'off„- .. _ -.. - i � o .,..'+ ,.. .'•.Y t CHECK BOXES AS COMPLETED � =� , Tape this form to outs! ( ) Pull ZBA copy.of ND Q; , Q (. ) Check file bq)�es for p •`D N (. ):Assign text-numberorl o . .outside of file folder,; (�) Daae stamp entire:oril :.`r �. X .o � 0a Z file.number v. :� h oo sy Or ( ') Hoie punch entire origi - ='x, 77 (before:sending to T C m, - (D �' 5 co Z N ! s (�,. 00 Create new index cards � j ( ) m � r.. ( ) Print contact info 8r tai E ) Prepare transmittal to N Send or, =rna.k aggtort Y V .to:16Wn- Berk- ` Npte trts:de fate folCer ; ---_ rstde of ft , ( ) Co:Ry G¢r my Ia. Map, neighbors and AG Make 7bptes and: put ( ) Do . arling label BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie,Kanes Weisman,Chairperson hO��Of souT�olo 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes .l . Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. 4 • COQ 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento �l,Y�,oU Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov RECEIVED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 4- TOWN OF SOUTHOLD D E - 6 2021 Tel.(631)765-1809 Fax(631)765-9.064 � l� uthold Town Clerk FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF DECEMBER 2,2021 ZBA FILE: #7467 NAME OF APPLICANT: Vincent Bertault PROPERTY LOCATION: 95 Navy Street, Orient NY SCTM: 1000-26-1-12.2 SEQRA DETERMINATION:.The Zoning Board-of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type_II category,of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A'14-14 to 23;and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated January 12,2021 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant*county-wide or inter.-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: The relief,.permit,'or interpretation requested in this application is listed under the Minor Actions exempt list and is not subject to review under Chapter 268. PROPERTY FACTS%DESCR]PTION: The subject, 19,905 square feet, .45 acre,non-conforming, irregular-shaped parcel with two front yards, located in the R40 Zoning District measures 85.71 feet along Navy Street, then runs 154.15 feet along a residentially developed lot to the east.then runs west 54.53 feet along a second residentially developed lot to the north,then runs north 49.92 feet along the same neighbor,then runs 65.93 feet west along Willow Street (secondary road frontage), then runs 207.7 feet along a third, residentially developed parcel to the west, returning to Navy Street. The property is.improved with a two-story wood-frame, seasonal residence with covered front porch, a wooden shed, a one- and one-half story wooden barn, stockade fencing and post & wire fencing as shown on the survey prepared by John T.Metzger,Licensed Surveyor, last dated December 3, 2020. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article 111, Section 280-15; Article XXIII, Section 280- 124; and the Building Inspector's October 22, 2020 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling,and construct an in ground swimming pool; at 1)proposed additions located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet;2)the accessory swimming pool is located in other than the code permitted rear yard; located at: 95 Navy Street,Orient,NY. SCTM No. 1000-26-1-12.2. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to construct additions and alterations to an existing seasonal dwelling which include the expansion of an existing covered front porch attached to a single-family residence having a front yard setback of 2.72 feet where the Code requires a minimum 35 feet front yard setback. Page 2,December 2,2021 #7467,Bertault—Area Variances SCTM No. 1000-26-1-12.2 The front of the house that will be unaffected by the proposed construction currently measures 1.08 feet from the front yard property line resulting from the angled position of the residence on the subject property. The applicant also proposes to raise the existing seasonal dwelling two feet above the floodplain in order to make it FEMA compliant as a year-round residence.Further the applicant requests relief to locate an accessory in ground swimming pool measuring 10 feet by 21 feet in the front yard where accessory swimming pools are only permitted by Code in the rear yard. Lastly,the application is subject to the Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commission as the property is located in the Orient Historic District, a designated National Historic District,which includes approximately 120 buildings. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION: The application was reviewed by the Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commission who offered copy of RESOLUTION #10.22.20.2 dated December 17, 2020 denying the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness based on the applicant's submission of final proposal of the project to the Commission at the October 22, 2020 public hearing. In a NOTICE OF APPEAL dated February 3,2021,the applicant's attorney appealed to the Town of Southold Town Board pursuant to Code §170-11 seeking a reversal of the Resolution. The Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commission on April 15,2021 offered RESOLUTION#04.15.21.3 in consideration of design changes as amended and proposed,held a vote on April 15,2021 to approve the modifications as applied for, and,the HPC withdrew the appeal and approved and accepted amended proposed drawings as alternations and additions to the existing dwelling as applied for. The amended plans prepared by Gary O'Connor,AIA are last revised March.11;2021 and labeled A- 55 A-6,A-7. The Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commission previously approved the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness under.RESOLUTION #6.17.14.1 dated June 18, 2014 based on the applicant's public hearing on June 17, 2014 relative to the proposed relocation and preservation of an existing accessory barn and shed. On September 1, 2021 the Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commission submitted to the Board of Appeals a letter addressing their concerns over the open building permit-for this application relative to t alterations undertaken and proposed to.the as built accessory barn that were not in compliance with the 2014 HPC Certificate of Appropriateness for the existing accessory barn. A stop work order was issued by the Town of Southold Building Department for scope of work not in compliance with the 2014 HPC Certificate of Appropriateness RESOLUTION #6.17.14.1 dated June 18,2014. PRIOR APPROVALS AND PERMITS The subject parcel is the beneficiary of ZBA decision#5218 dated May 22,2003 allowing for the creation of a minor subdivision where the lots created, 2395 Village Lane and 95 Navy Street, (including the subject) would be non- conforming in size and would also maintain existing non-conformities relative to the existing placement of the seasonal residential structure and accessory garage built well before current zoning went into effect. The subject parcel is also the beneficiary of ZBA decision#6729 dated April 21, 2014 allowing for the relocation,preservation and restoration of an historic accessory barn from a nonconforming front yard location on Navy Street to a non- conforming front yard location on Willow Street with a proposed 25-foot front yard setback,in order to avoid driving over an inground septic system in the Navy Street front yard.Failure to comply with this prior ZBA decision is also partially subject of the STOP WORK ORDER currently pending resolution(see below). As illustrated in the application, current lot coverage is 2,274 square feet;proposed increase in building lot coverage is 1,157 square feet representing a total of 17.2% lot coverage, if approved. The applicant proposes to lift the residential structure, two-feet above the flood plain, and install a new FEMA compliant foundation along with increasing habitable space, at the rear of the structure, to accommodate a first-floor bedroom and bathroom, the expansion of a non-habitable covered porch, new windows, new roofing, new siding — on the entire structure. Currently,the applicant has an open building permit, #4419, dated September 23, 2019, to relocate an existing barn building and shed as applied for per Landmarks Preservation Commission Certificate of Appropriateness and ZBA approval, with flood permit(Replaces BP#41328). Page 3,December 2,2021 #7467,Bertault—Area Variances SCTM No. 1000-26-1-12.2 The subject property has a PRE-EXISTING Certificate of Occupancy, Z-30982, dated June 15, 2005 covering a seasonal one-family dwelling and two accessory storage buildings. On August 24, 2021 a STOP WORK ORDER was issued by the Town of Southold Building Department,regarding construction beyond the scope of Building Permit#44198, pending resolution of the ZBA application. .The STOP WORK ORDER was,in response to excessive excavation at the site including the installation of masonry walls, considered fencing,along much of the perimeter of the property and the raising.of the relocated barn onto an elevated concrete foundation thereby necessitating the construction of.a ramped driveway to access the barn proposed'.to be converted to a garage and an accessory apartment from Willow Street with a slope of approximately 17%. The pool in the front yard is proposed to be located in an elevated earthen plinth in continuance with the concrete retaining walls required for the elevated foundation of the historic barn proposed to be converted to a garage and accessory apartment in the related application 47468SE also before the Board. On August 6,2021 a NOTICE OF CLAIM, in the matter of the claim of Vincent Bertault against Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals was received. ON SITE DRAINAGE AND GRADING PLAN The applicant provided a copy of an email chain dated January 12,2021 from Damon Rallis,former Southold Town Building Department Plans Examiner, to Gary O'Connor, Architect, stating that he was sorry he forgot to tell the applicant that the Grading and Drainage Plan for the Bertault application was approved by the Building Department. However,no record of the stamped approved plan was submitted by the applicant nor could it be found in the records of the Building Department. The applicant submitted a Grading and Drainage Plan to the ZBA by Condon Engineering,P.C.dated 12/14/2000 without.a stamped approval from the Building Department or the Southold Town Engineer, in contradiction to a letter dated June 11, 2021, in which the applicant's attorney stated that"All storm water management work is being conducted in accordance with a plan approved by the Southold Town Engineer. The Plan meets the requirements of the code.A copy of the plan has been submitted-to the ZBA." On June 16,2021 members of the Board of Appeals conducted a coordinated inspection of the subject premises with Michael Collins, Town of Southold Engineer to discuss the ongoing excavation on the subject property including the construction of a series of concrete retaining walls,before approvals had been granted by the Board. Collins informed the Board that he had not reviewed or approved a drainage and grading plan for the subject property. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION At a public hearing the Board discussed with the applicant and his agents that two required off street parking spaces for the principal dwelling, accessed directly from Navy Street and near the dwelling, would be required per code. On June 3, 2021 the applicant's architect Gary O'Connor provided an amended Site Plan, labeled A-1 showing one off street parking space accessed from Navy Street near the dwelling in the southwest corner of the property and a second proposed space accessed from Willow Street in the northwest corner of the property near the relocated barn. Numerous members of the public and immediate neighbors spoke against this application and submitted written objections to the proposed project y. Multiple complaints by area residents are on file relative to work performed at the subject premises going back to 2013. The applicant concurrently is seeking approval for a Special Exception permit under ZBA file #7468SE for the conversion of the accessory storage barn into a garage with a workshop and an accessory apartment located on both the first and secondary floors. On June 3, 2021 the application was amended to include only first floor habitable space consisting of a full bathroom,kitchen and open living area measuring 22'7"by 17'2"(no bedroom)with a full staircase to a proposed storage area on the second floor, calculated at a conforming 478 sq. ft. of livable floor area (not confirmed by the Town Building Inspector as required) and a one car garage. As both applications were Page 4,December 2,2021 #7467,Bertault–Area Variances SCTM No. 1000-26-1-12.2 submitted at the same time and the proposed alterations are intrinsically intertwined,the public hearings were opened and heard simultaneously. Both hearings were closed at the October 7,2021 Regular Meeting of the Board of Appeals.FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held public hearings on this application on March 4, 2021;June 3,2021; and October 7, 2021 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the(Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variance to raise and relocate the house, from pre-existing, non- conforming front yard areas into new, non-conforming front yard locations will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant's property is located in a historic district that includes numerous buildings, including both principal dwellings and accessory structures,with non-conforming setbacks; all situated in locations that pre-date zoning. The average building front yard setback on Navy Street is estimated to be approximately 17+/- feet. The applicant proposes to maintain the current front yard setback of 1.08 feet and 2.72 feet relative to the proposed construction of an expanded 1, non-habitable, unenclosed front porch. The applicant's proposed additions and alterations to the historic dwelling received HPC approval on April 15, 2021 via RESOLUTION#04:15:21.3. However,the installation of an elevated inground swimming pool; measuring 10 feet by 21 feet, proposed to be located in a front.yard where the code-requires such improvements to be located in a rear yard will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The subject parcel is located in a historic district where locating a pool in a front yard,despite the applicant having no other alternative location to place it, is not in keeping with the character of the historic community.. Furthermore,as a result of the Stop Work Order,dated August 24,2021,regarding construction beyond the scope of Building Permit#44198 the proposed pool would be located adjacent to and.on an elevated plinth with retaining walls associated with the relocated barn. 2. Town Law X267-b(30)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant, relative to the requested front yard setback cannot be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue,other than an area variance. The applicant's property is located between two streets,creating two front yards and the applicant's house is historically located 1.08 feet back from the front yard lot line where the code'requires 35 feet. The applicant could meet the average setback of area homes on Navy Street, approximately 17+/- feet. However, variance relief relative to a reduced front yard setback would still be required and financial and other expert evidence submitted by the applicant's attorney documents that the historic dwelling would be structurally at risk and be cost prohibitive to raise and move to a more conforming front yard setback.The benefit sought by the applicant,relative to the requested placement of an inground swimming pool in a front yard where the code requires such improvements to be located in the rear yard, cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The applicant's property is a through lot with frontage on two streets, and therefore has two front yards and no rear yard. 3. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial, representing 96.9% relief from the code relative to the requested relief for a reduced front yard setback and 100% relief from the code relative to the requested relief for locating an inground swimming pool in a front yard location. However, the residential structure was built prior to zoning and the applicant proposes to maintain the existing front yard setback and increase it slightly for the proposed addition. Additionally, the proposed changes to the dwelling have received approval from the Town's Historic Preservation Commission. Swimming pools are not commonly located in front yards in this historic community or in non-waterfront parcels throughout the Town of Southold.Moreover,the subject property is located in a flood hazard zone: AE-6 ft. and the applicant is proposing to elevate both the renovated dwelling and the historic barn to FEMA compliance. However, pools located in flood prone areas are not in compliance with the policies of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan. The LWRP requires agencies reviewing Page 5,December 2,2021 #7467,Bertault—Area Variances SCTM No. 1000-26-1-12.2 actions to review them for consistency with the LWRP policies pursuant to section 268-5 of the Town Code. The Board hereby determines that the installation of an elevated in-ground pool in a front yard is inconsistent with Policy 1 which requires an action to foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development pursuant to town code section 268-5 (1)(a) and Policy 4 which requires the action to be consistent with the policy to minimize the loss of life,structures and natural resources from flooding and erosion pursuant to town code section 268-5 (I) (d). 4. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(4). No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community for the additions and alterations to the dwelling will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code and the conditions imposed herein. 5. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6.Town Law 4267-b. Grant of the requested relief relative to the front yard setback is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of alterations and additions to a single family residence with a proposed front yard setback of 1.08 feet for the pre-existing structure and 2.72 feet for the addition of a non- habitable, unenclosed front porch measuring 7.78 feet by 28.9 feet (228 square feet) and other conforming additions/improvements,and,the granting of the requested relief relative to the installation of an inground swimming pool, located in a front yard, is not the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable to applicant to enjoy the benefit of this improvement while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B,motion was offered by Member Weisman(Chairperson),seconded by Member Dantes,and duly carried,to GRANT the variance relative to the front yard setback for the renovated dwelling as applied for, as shown on the survey prepared by John T. Metzger, Licensed Surveyor last dated December 3, 2020 and the site plan prepared by Gary R. O'Connor,Architect and dated December 15,2020 and labeled A-1 through A-5. DENY the variance relative to the swimming pool as applied for SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The entire covered front porch facing Navy Street(and the wrap-around portion)shall remain open and unenclosed.No installation of plastic sheeting,windows, screening or shuttering and the like is permitted, and the porch must remain unheated and unconditioned. The applicant shall submit an amended survey or site plan stamped by a licensed professional depicting the approved front yard variance,eliminating the in-ground swimming pool in the front yard, and showing the location of two off street parking spaces for the principal dwelling accessed directly from Navy Street. 3. Applicant shall install a new IA wastewater sanitary system that complies with Suffolk County Department of Health Services regulations. 4. Prior to receiving a building permit,the owner(s)of the subject property cited herein must sign a statement acknowledging: a. That the applicant(s)have read this determination and understand the limits of the variance relief granted herein; Page 6,December 2,2021 #7467,Bertault—Area Variances SCTM No. 1000-26-1-12.2 v b. That the applicant(s)will immediately contact the Building Department if a demolition, as defined by Section 280-4 of the Town Code,' occurs during construction, or any construction undertaken in any other way exceeds the scope of the approvals granted herein, or the issued building permit; c. That the applicants are aware that the Zoning Board of Appeals retains jurisdiction until the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy and has the right, after a public hearing,to modify, suspend or revoke such approvals or any term or condition thereof or to impose thereon one or more new conditions-,pursuant to Article XXV, Section 280-141 of the Town Code. This approval shall not be deemed effective until the required conditions have been met.At the discretion of the Board of Appeals,failure to comply with the above conditions may render this decision null and void That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or apossible denial by the Building Department of a buildingpermit, and may require anew application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Pursuant to Chapter 280-146(B) of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured, and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three (3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may, upon written request prior to the date of expiration, grant an extension not to exceed three (3) consecutive one (1)year terms. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Weisman, (Chairperson), Dantes, Acampora, Planamento, and Lehnert. This Reso)trtiVn was duly adopted(5-0). Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing ./2021 NOTE: Section 280-4 of the Town Code defines"Demolition"as any removal of a structure or portion thereof,where the total cost of the reconstruction of the structure or portion thereof exceeds 50% of the market value of the existing structure before the start of removal. BOARD MEMBERS 1)� Say Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �°® 53095 Main Road o P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora 4P Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento ®�P�� Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 6, 2022 Tel.(631) 765-1809 Vincent Bertault P.O. Box 51 Orient, NY 11957 Dear Mr. Bertault; The Zoning Board of Appeals has approved the Site Plan, labeled"Principal Dwelling Additions and Alterations, Sheet A-1, prepared by Gary R. O'Connor, last revised January 5, 2022 in accordance with the Findings and Determination dated December 2, 2021 issued in application #7467, which granted a variance for the front yard setback for the single family home fronting Navy Street, Orient. This should not be deemed as an approval with respect to any other structure depicted on the approved map. The approved map will now be submitted to the Building Department in furtherance of the pending building permit application. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact our office. Very.truly yours. Les ' es Weisman C rson . cc: Eric Bressler, Attorney Gary O'Connor, R.A. NOTE: SITE PLAN INCORPORATES DATA FROM SURVEY PREPARED BY: PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C., WILLOW STREET - GARY R. O'CONNOR SOUTHHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 - - -- _ _ - _ _ _ _ - ° r, EL.5.2' Af? EL 4.3 _ N85 28 30 E 65.93' ARCHITECT AIA MARCHDECEMBER 12, 2012 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r - _ - - - - -- ' Ma �'c�a' MAR H 02 2020 NOVEMBER 23, 2020 - - -- - - T.W. 9.2, r' B.W. 5.2' B.W. 5.2' ; 8 Coryell Street y AL t. � Lambertville, NJ 08530 . 020554 Y7 r' r .,. EXISTING WILLOW 0 es;.:,, •-•, J TREE TRUNK j;S` ' Y �� 1 Phone: 609.397.3635 � f M_ �SEE DEC;SiAN ;ATE- �� : a ! � � PROJECT DATA DRIVEWAY r, N r, TAX MAP ID: 1000-26-01-12.2 N�fG'� ,��'`. �t� �" � LOT#2(LOT REFERS TO SUBDIVISION MAP FILED IN SUFFOLK CO. 0) ��`'�/ CLERK'S OFFICE. (APRIL 19,2005 AS FILE NO. 11245. 4'-0" HIGH WD. r " AT VERTICAL SLAT FENCE r ADDRESS: 95 NAVY STREET i L d� � - � ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 -(-CLnj kL (� ,,' ZONING DISTRICT: R-40, RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITYAA EL.=7.83 O SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE:AE-6' FROM FIRM. No.36103C0068H 09.25.2009 z 35_FRONT YARD SETBACK O EXISTING:2 STY. DWELLING ACCESSORY SHED&BARN BLDG. ' � (,5=�''`j� I i - j N PROPOSED:- RAISE DWELLING, BUILD NEW FOUNDATION AND co O ' I I EXISTING 1 1/2 STY. FRAME 1 ADDITIONS AS SHOWN. 7. , I 4-0 HIGH WD. PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCES: ON j I BARN i VERTICAL SLAT FENCE f r; I FLR. EL.=8.6' / SHED AND BARN RELOCATED PER ZBA FILE: 6729 ;, # # 15' I 1 EL.4.91 BUILDING/PORCH EXPANSION IN FRONT YARD ZBA FILE:7467 6'-0" HIGH HEDGEROW W/ `3 I 1 20'B W 7 $3' W. 9'2, o HIDDEN WIRE FENCING r f' I EL =7.83' YI B.W. 4.9' N89 56'00"E 3 5453' ZONING COMPUTATIONS I DOWN _ T.W. 9.2' _ _ ZONING DISTRICT: R-40 A, l 3 I I coOfEL.=7.83' EL.=7.25' - - SHED , i ¢�) W`7•2 - _ LOT REQUIREMENTS: REQUIRED EXISTING* PROPOSED 0 ; B.W. 7.2' MIN. LOT SIZE 40,000 S.F. 19,905 S.F. NO CHANGE mIo p0 IEL.6.6' MIN. LOT WIDTH 150 FT. 104 FT. NO CHANGE 14 w; Im w0) MIN. LOT DEPTH 175 FT. 207 FT. NO CHANGE 1 l� X10 i 1 0 �- i ° ofO PRINCIPAL BUILDING MINIMUM YARD I HT REQUIREMENTS: I L 1 -� , { i I •� REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED E Y� I �Iw I N FRONT YARD 35' 1.08' NO CHANGE ti . wIv o v EL.=7.83' I 0 { I 91< EL.=7.83'1 - SIDE YARD 10'(BOTH 25') 16.6'&55' 16.6'&40.64' 3 1 Corp 1 m REAR YARD 35' 106.5' 90' MAX HEIGHT 35FT 21' NO CHANGE 21/2 STY. 2 STY. NO CHANGE Ems_ I L LARGEST FLOOR AREA INCLUDING COVERED PORCH): 2, 35'REAR YgRD ( 001 S.F. - SETBACK FpR P NEW BUILDING AREA: 613 S.F. k I - ._ RINCIPAL BLG. FLOOD HAZARD ZONE: AE-ELEVATION-6' EXISTING FLOOR ELEVATION: 6.5' ` I I PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION: 8.0' 1 SHED h T.W. k17' I ACCESSORY BUILDING(BARN)MINIMUM YARD/HT. REQUIREMENTS: :. B.W. 7.83' rn NEW STONE 1 REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING STONE = w CURB WALL g'VV 4 0,M J ` WALL T.W. 8.17' SIDE YARD 15' 15'&20' NO CHANGE EXISTING B'W 7 SHED I TOTAL SIDE YARDS 25 35' NO CHANGE Mr s R F s{ 7";tv I REAR YARD 20 1 N/A NO CHANGE >,. 1 MAX HEIGHT 22' 19'-4' 11.5 STY. NO CHANGE 4'-0" HIGH HEDGEROW W/ ; HIDDEN WIRE FENCING r=Y1 AT- RAIN T . RAIN GARDEN DOWN I SITE COVERAGE: EXISTING PROPOSED J I4 42+ < 6' I EXISTING DWELLING 950 S.F. 4' 1 5' 1 EXISTING COVERED PORCH 210 S.F. FR. GAR. � ' + 1 EXISTING SHED 184 S.F. - ��. � � 1 I , ' 1 7 T.W. ISTING BARN 930 S.F. . . .3' 1 T.W.T.W .3' T.W. 6.6 I PROPOSED NEW ADDITION 653 S.F. B.W. 5.0' I B.W. 5.25'± B.W. 6.6 I PROPOSED COVERED PORCH 228 S.F. Lt �, I I Y B.W. 7.0' 06 �s` I ¢ C� DN. 35.66' 40.64' I_j TOTAL 0° 0UP ca - DWELLLING ,L 1 w m 7.3' 6.6' I 950 S.F. 653 S.F. 1,603 S.F. 15.66' 20' Q TOTAL BUILDING AREAS 2,274 S.F. 881 S.F. 3,155 S.F. IVF' I 7.3 I (U �_ 1 ALLOWED EXISTING PROPOSED " I } z Ola Y_ PROPOSED 1 STY. FRAME I MAX LOT COVERAGE 20% 11.4% 16.0% 0 0 -� : . ` "v ADDITION. 613 SQ. FT. 04 i w (n 'PRE-EXISTING NON-CONFORMING LOT PER SECTION 280-124 FR. HSE. . r. PROPOSED FLR. EL.=8 U �- Lot 1 1 m luta;,YY i = ' - cp 1w W W Q j I . 9.0' 6.6' 0 _ n 0 i z-�JI B.W. 7.0' 7' - EXISTING 1 - - I in � UTILITY 1 w Q z I M I o 'y I w aI EXISTING 0 ,RM- 1MECHANICAL/ I C0 22 01.05.22 DS REMOVED POOL&PARKING SPACE RELOCATION G) Kq,. '+ Z I o in p �? ( MUD ROOM. N I 1� 06.09.21 DS MODIFIED PARKING&1 LEVEL APARTMENT LAYOUT U EXISTING KITCHEN N 1 I T.W. 9.0' I NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION LB.W. 7.0' - 38' IT g Z Cn ' t" JUL 6 2022 I 3 - - - - - - - 35_FRONT YARD SETBACK � REVISIONS FOR PRINCIPAL BLDG. IT IS THE RESPONSIBLITIYOFTHE CONTRACTOR ``ter:' i 7 TO VERIFYALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND COMPARE 16. THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 7' GARDEN BEFORE COMMENCING.ACTIVITES,ERRORS, T.W. 7.3' 14' OMMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES �,1 ;_ DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE REPORTED -B.W. 53, UP TOTHEARCHITECT V• r' ( _ _ _ PROJECT NAME LL B.W. 6.6' � :.A �`-� r � PRINCIPAL DWELLING ADDITION &ALTERATIONS . :' : I I EXISTING 2 STY. FRAME HOUSE for : =^` I I I PROPOSED FLR.EL.=81) c6 0 _ AVERAGE SET BACK ON NAVY STREET: 17.3' BERTAULT RESIDENCE ' R 16.6 -- N r - - �11�� rd --�- 1 BASED ON PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C., 95 NAVY STREET, ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 ri I I I COVEREDPROPOSED PARKING APRIL 25, 2013 5,0' PORCH EXPANSION. SPACE 1 DRAWINGTITLE 228 SQ. FT. 0 I COVER SHEET, PROJECT DATA& BUILDING STANDARDS T.W. 6.7' PARKING �$•6' o FN I 1 I 126.23' SPACE ;� N B.W. 6'6 1 I DATE 12.15.20 DRAWING NO. EL.4.8 � uP T.W. 6.7' - g - - - - - - - - - - 7.78' I I B.W. 6.0' JOB NO. 1950 z S82049'40"W 17.86' UP - S86� 8 20 - - - L _ _ _ EL.6.0' SITE PLAN SCALE: 1"= 10'-0" SCALE:AS SHOWN A-1 NAVY STREET - - - - - - rr " - - -...._ _ _ - DRAWN DS 4 W 85.711BY: - - - REVIEWED - BY: C SURVEY OF PROPERTY �P AT ORIENT to SCTM# 1000-26-01-04 0 TOWN OF SO UTHOLD DWELLING •- - WELL SUFFOLK COUNTY, MY O Jv ® WELL SCTM# 1000-26-01-05 1000-26-01-12.2 SCTM# 1000-26-01-03 DWELLING SCALE. 1' 30' DWELLING WELL DECEMBER 12, 2012 WELL 1 MARCH 2, 2020 cP I NOVEMBER 23, 2020 (ELEVA77ONS) DECEMBER 3, 2020 (PROPOSED ADD1770N) CP 53' - -- -- - - 177' ® WELL CLEL, o 5.1' to N/O/F � STREET LAWRENCE BERSTEIN RE EIUED WILL 0 �lT,r � SCTM# 1000-26-01-06 65.93' DWELLING I N85'28'30"E I 0..5.2' WELL I DEC 2, 12020 • 1 EL.4.3' 3 Zoning Board Of Appeals 52 N 140' S' o v,' CP \ 22.3 1 \ ` ` 1-1�Nr. N89'56'00"E 22, 50 1 ra TOP '1 54.53' &.1.5'N. MON.0.2'N to Z o FOUNDATION8.66EL'.,3.9' 0.4'E. e•- EL=8.6' - STOCKADE FE. • SCTM# 1000-26-01-13 O 15.0 9.4' i? 20.0' ,` t FE.O EL.6.5' 70' DWELLING I WELL � 1 Lot z ; P20P620V �` SHED 11.3' 5.0' N/O/FSTONE (J1 TEST HOLE DATA - RETXNINC SONIA GESELL McDONALD GEOSCIENCE WALL�' S(,TM� 1000-26-01-11.1 12/06/2019 ' DWELLING 1 WELL Lot 01 i 1 DARK BROWN LOAM OL `D 1• 0 ; 1 ; `" BROWN SILT MLN/0/F A 1 ` It A� '1 I EVAN & LYNN LEWIS 5° t t STH �� 1 4' r SCTM# 1000-26-01-12.1, WN 1 \ 1 i 1, BROW FINE TO COARSE DWELLINGJ' , `�� { , '1-''- SAND SM WELL �` � ' WELLR00M � ® WELL v 11 0 ,s.i 1 WELL o r STY_ WA `•s.r 1 I WATER IN BROWN FINE TO LnHSE. COARSE SAND SP -M 14.4 ^' 2 STORY �4 .k) FRAME ; 0 O - HOUSE SEPTIC . V(F.FIR•EL=6.5' PROPOSED FE-OA. , , 28.8' COVERED 135.5 i PORCH CMF NOTE: WATER ENCOUNTERED 4.3' BELOW SURFACE �� 1s s � PICKET EL.6.0' ELEVA77ONS REFERENCED TO NA VD 88 C F — 1 t' POR RED, 126.23 EL.4. • 9'4(9"w 85.71 S82 �, S$G'18'20"IK CLEL. KEY � � C'•E� STREET 5.5 QO = REBAR —� �� t�/ j T�j 4.8 ® = WELL ® = STAKE �- = TEST HOLE } LUv`1P� �JViet" t 1st ' I ® WELL �, '�� Q r �C �S 140' ® = PIPE `y�(�� V��t� ® = MONUMENT 130 ® WELL I = WETLAND FLAG I I I SCTM# 1000-26-01-25 9Q-i, = U77LI TY POLE I SCTM# 1000-26-01-24 DWELLING SCTM# 1000-26-01-21 1 DWELLING WELL NOTE: PROPERTY LOCATED ENTIRELY IN AE6 ZONE DWELLING WELL WELL .�{*� OF NE``',Y FROM FIRM. No. 36103CO068H 9/25/2009. ® WELL I � T. tvr-- �r�r Lot ®'s refer to "SUBDIVISION MAP FOR JOHN H. WOODHOUSE Z C� & JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE" FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE ON APRIL 19, 2005 AS FILE No.11245. THE LOCA77ONS OF WELLS AND CESSPOOLS SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM FIELD OBSERVA77ONS AND OR FROM DATA OBTAINED FROM OTHERS. THEREFORE THEIR LOCA77ONS AND OR EX/S7FNCEp - +, v �o.tc X13 J LIC. NO. 49618 LEACHING GALLEY IS NOT GUARANTEED. O ._ PECONIC�;SUR,W�MRS C. ANY ALTERA77ON OR ADD177ON TO THIS SURVEY/S A WOLA77ON OF SEC77ON 7209 OF 7HE NEW AREA= 19,905 SQ.F7. J J (631) 765-5020 FAX (631) 765-1797 YORK STATE EDUCA77ON LAW. EXCEPT AS PER SEC77ON 7209—SUBDIVISION 2. ALL J J P.O. BOX 909 CER77FICA77ONS HEREON ARE VALID FOR THIS MAP AND COPIES THEREOF ONLY/F SAID MAP OR 1230 TRAVELER S7REET COPIES BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR WHOSE SIGNATURE APPEARS HEREON. CP SOUTHOLD, MY 11971 12-279 NOTE: SITE PLAN INCORPORATES DATAFROM SURVEY PREPARED BY: PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C., WILLOW STREET GARY R. O'CONNOR / SOUTHHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 ' - - - - - - - - _ _ _ EL.4.3' N85°28'30"E DECEMBER 12, 2012 - - - - - -' - - -" ' - - - - - - - - _ _ �,_,. 3 ' 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ 65.9 ' EL.5.2' ARCHITECT, AIA - iD,Coh�,�� MARCH 02, 2020 a �� n NOVEMBER 23, 2020 I 3 TOTAL OFF T.W. 9.2' r DAMAGED STREET PARKING WILLOW TREE TO If ' BE REMOV8 CORYELL STREET - C 00 54 ED. NEW WILLOW TREE LAMBERTVILLE, NJ 08530 l i I1 t O TO BE PLANTED PHONE: 609.397.3635 ' >D ' PROJ ECT DATA t T I ► i N TAX MAP ID: 1000-26-01-12.2 ( . T.W. 6.8' L _ I I t LOT#2(LOT REFERS TO SUBDIVISION MAP FILED IN SUFFOLK CO. t ' B.W. 6.8' ` `' L- CLERK'S OFFICE.(APRIL 19 2005 AS FILE NO. 11245. 4'-0" HIGH WD. ' AT VERTICAL SLAT FENCE ADDRESS: 95 NAVY STREET I \ ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 f.: ZONING DISTRICT: R40, RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY AA EL.=7.8.3' SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE:AE-6' FROM FIRM. No.36103CO068H 09.25.2009 35_FRONT YARD SETBACK ' EXISTING:2 STY. PRINCIPAL FRAME DWELLING W/ACCESSORY SHED & 0 I : I I - - - _ - - 1 cV BARN BLDG. 0 EXISTING 1 1/2 STY. FRAME ' ` I I BARN W/ PROPOSED 1 I co PROPOSED:-COVERED PORCH EXPANSION& 1 STY. FRAME ADDITION ' ' II TO PRINCIPAL BLDG. N I BEDROOM ACCESSORY I APARTMENT& 1 CAR -CHANGE USE OF SHED FROM STORAGE TO CABANA, i I GARAGE -ACCESSORY POOL. C t 4'-0" HIGH WD. PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE: C 15' I _ FLR. EL.=8.6' t 20, EL-4.9 VERTICAL SLAT FENCE SHED AND BARN RELOCATED PER ZBA FILE:6729 6'-0" HIGH HEDGEROW W/ I T.W. 9.2' HIDDEN WIRE FENCING i I I B.W. 4'9' 'V89056F001►E vARIANC EXPANSEON OFQ EXISTING NON-CONFORMING FRONT YARD SEBACK 3, A,t I EL.=i.83' U 0 B.W. 7.83' DOW - 54.53 FOR PRINCIPAL BLDG. i I ~ld N T.W9 2' -LOCATION OF POOL IN FRONT YARD 'f I ( LugEL.=7.83' EL.=7.25' - �`', EL.=6.7 B.W. 6.6'- - SHED I pl� T.W. 6.7 ZONING COMPUTATIONS Irf� .. I Q w mlm pts EL.6.6' ZONING DISTRICT: R-40 wIr cn LOT REQUIREMENTS: REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED 010 "/� �.i MIN. LOT SIZE 40,000 S.F. 19,905 S.F.* NO CHANGE re CD IWMIN. LOT WIDTH 150 FT. 104 FT. NO CHANGE PIT� Iwiv - pN > OMIN. LOT DEPTH 175 FT. 207 FT. NO CHANGE I pI EL.-7.83 EL -7 8 ! ON _ PRINCIPAL BUILDING MINIMUM YARD/HT REQUIREMENTS: 4b 1�1 vl'N ( �Ip m REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED FRONT YARD 35' 1.08' NO CHANGE elk I - SIDE YARD 10'(60TH 25') 16.6'&55' 16.6'&40.64' I - _ a REAR YARD 35' 106.5' 90' I I NEW IN-GROUND POOL - _ 35'REAR YARD SETBgCK FOR`? '- - _ MAX HEIGHT 35 FT 21' NO CHANGE 10')(21' ` - - K -R PRINCIPq�g�G 21/2 STY. 2 STY. NO CHANGE 8'09 ` 1 LARGEST FLOOR AREA(INCLUDING COVERED PORCHI 2,001 S.F. ' �SS CVS `' ` 0 R '.11.11' I M NEW BUILDING AREA: �0613 S.F. MT W, NEW STONE d i SHED FLOOD HAZARD ZONE: AE-ELEVATION-61 EXISTING STONE I `f;`' ' B. 7.83 WALL EXISTING FLOOR ELEVATION: 6.5 - CURB WALL HORIZONTAL PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION: 8' T.W. 8.17' ENLARGEMENT TO EXISTING HOUSE POWDER ACCESSORY BUILDING(BARN)MINIMUM YARD 1 HT. REQUIREMENTS: of �, t `_ B.W. 7.0 ry ) rv, ;v ''B W 5 2' o SHED ROOM &WET BAR REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED < ( NEW CABANA AREA:280 SF. SIDE YARD 15' 15'&20' NO CHANGE r 4'-0" HIGH HEDGEROW W/ {' TOTAL SIDE YARDS 25' 35' NO CHANGE �;.;•",- , I ,,.,. ' _ j HIDDEN WIRE FENCING 1 REAR YARD 20' NIA NO CHANGE AT I ' MAX HEIGHT19'-4"/ G :�;.:;.::,._`m :;�:`.:': .` : ,,. .K. ,. 22 1.5 STY. NO CHANGE I RAIN FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA: 439 S.F.I 1 ., tt. GARDEN DOWN `'' 8,091 I SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA: 302 S.F. < 1 6.6' I I TOTAL: 741 S.F.<750 S.F. FR. GAR. '';" t I SITE COVERAGE: EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING DWELLING 950 S.F. '± I EXISTING COVERED PORCH 2 T.W. 7.3' 35.66' T.W. 6.6 40.64 10 S.F. B.W. 5.0' I B.W. 6.6' I EXISTING SIHED 184 S.F. EXISTING BARN 930 S.F. I B.W. 7.0' I U DN. I PROPOSED NEW ADDITION 613 S.F. m o UP 1 m PROPOSED COVERED PORCH 228 S.F. ?:� Iiw m 15.66' 20' 6 Q PROPOSED POOL 220 S.F. mp _ _a p ¢ 7. '� _ 1 U PROPOSED SHED ADDITION 96 S.F. O = I v I� w z 1 n' TOTAL ,. I T �I `,' t p a PROPOSED 1 STY. FRAME I p _ __ _ DWELLLING `_ i 100 - ADDITION. 613 SQ. FT. I w 950 S.F. 613 S.F. 1,563 S.F. FR. HSE. - F° I o O - ,/ 1 Y � - ---- - - - -- U- PROPOSED FLR. EL.=8 U TOTAL BUILDING AREAS 2,274 S.F. 1,157 S.F. 3,431 S.F. Lot 1 -y. y I 0 j < i,. N[ ;,rt t I T.W. 9.0' 2.67' m I _' t B W 7 0' I w cn ALLOWED EXISTING PROPOSED f, _ MAX LOT COVERAGE 20% 11.4% 17.2% . t = Cn I CY_ z_�I `n `n 7 - EXISTING 6.6' i } *PRE-EXISTING NON-CONFORMING LOT PER SECTION 280-124 C .s to I ch UTILITY I i w '� 03 ='' w �I RM. EXISTING p 0 r,iY: -_- 1� _1 MECHANICAL/ ,:.ir ._ I z I o I VLO _ 0 .0 ��:r:,4 O �? I MUD ROOM. N r- U EXISTING KITCHEN 04 I Q •� y t;4',, I I T.W. 9.0� I ( ��VTO NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION I_B.W. 7.0 _ I 4.38 I, IT 1 �E�` 1 - I g��ra of f\ppF �s REVISIONS � L I J v - I 35 FRONT YARD SETBACK_FOR P i RINCIPAL BLDG. J . �onin9 {� I L6 I IT IS THE RESPONSIBLITIY OF THE CONTRACTOR 16. TO VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND COMPARE 7' I GARDEN THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS T.W. 7.3' 14' BEFORE COMMENCING.ACTIVITIES,ERRORS, OMMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER oB.W. 5.3', UP DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELY BEINCONSISTENCIES REPRTD TO THE ARCHITECT EXISTING 2 STY. FRAME HOUSE LL iA PROPOSED FLR.EL.=8') PROJECT NAME PRINCIPLE DWELLING ADDITION &ALTERATIONS AVERAGE SET BACK ON NAVY STREET: 17.3' for s �? 16.6'- ...- N BASED ON PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C., VINCENT BERTAULT 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 PROPOSED COVER D APRIL 25, 2013 PORCH EXPANSION, 228 SQ. FT. DRAWING TITLE T.W. 6.7 SITE PLAN, PROJECT DATA& ZONING COMPUTATIONS 00 ' 8.6' a ti oB.W. 6.6' B.W. 6.6' 26.23' EL.4.8' t N J-1111-1-1UP T.W. 6.7' DATE 12.15.20 DRAWING NO. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ 7.78' B.W. 6.0' 1950 r JOB NO. S82°49'40"W 17.86' UP - - - ' - - ' EL.6.0' SITE PLAN SCALE: 1"= 10'-0n NAVY STREET S86' 1 8',20"1 n - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ DRAWN DS SCALE:AS SHOWN G 8 BY: A 5.71 - _ _ REVIEWED BY: GRO'C « OMMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES GARY R. O'CONNOR --,, ARC. ARCHITECT, AIA EXISTING NEW 613 S.F. 8 CORYELL STREET ` `�`4, I0 20554 III LAMBERTVILLE, NJ 08530 �� , .. " �z , III PHONE: 609.397.3635 III TOP OF-CUPOLA 124'-3" "" -,- � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -® SPECIFICATION OUTLINE III TOP OF EXISTING RIDGE HEIGHT 121'-7" °1 ® _ _s; III ROOF: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (MEAN HEIGHT OF EXISTING RIDGE 122'-4") t ] _ - -{ CEDAR SHINGLES, WEATHER NATURALLY. - - - - - - - _ — TOP OFNEW RIDGE 120'-4"® —r — — — — — — — — - -' �T — +- -I-- -' - T SIDING: CEDAR SHINGLES, WEATHER NATURALLY. n' EXPOSED FOUNDATION: � _1 � ' �T III . I y '-- 1. I REPLACE K-STYLE GUTTERS W/ III --- ---- -- ' - T - - SMOOTH STUCCO NEUTRAL EARTH TONE COLOR T.B.D. EXISTING HEIGHT OF TOP PLATE FROM SECOND FLOOR 4'-5" - — - -L _�_. COPPER HALF ROUND GUTTERS ® - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - —1- - � ! - - rf 1` r IJ i I + J__ � � � WINDOWS: - 1 -- - i CUSTOM WOOD WINDOWS TO MATCH EXISTING. S.D.L. MUNTIN BAR ACER BAR. - S WI SP + ' r 1 - - - Ti 1 NEW COPPER HALF WALKWAYS: ROUND GUTTERS BLUE STONE OR SIMILAR NATURAL STONE. N k n I h Lf T - - _l, T T t i I - ; I IIII — , i�L d 7J A - I _ 1 — — ' FIRS"( FLOOR 101'-11" ! , -r� ._l,� � � _.i..l_�., rt - - { I _ _ fir- ' ! i i III _ r � s i 77 I (8' FLOOD COMPLIANT ELEVATION) ! r I._ __� � I r � � � T � �T I ' � :__pl' �- _ I � , r- - I - � . a . . . . : - . . � . Q . � � 11111-- e . � . : � : � . � . . : . —TERRACE GRADE 101'-4"a NEW GRADE 100'-11" III NEW GRADE 100'-11" Q FEMA 100 YEAR FLOOD �' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -NAVY STREET 100'-0"- - - - - — - — - - - - - - - — - — - — - - - - - - - 01 - - - - -- - - - 6'ELEVATION U ry cn 0 U 1� EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"= 1'-0" Q u_ F- O z TOP OF NEW RIDGE 120'-4" t --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IL 11 1 l_ - t� Jli If - ECI�ED JL-T-7 11 _ IL GARY R. O'CONNOR ARCHITECT, AIA `��aR o,�o 10, NEW EXISTING 0: < > 8 CORYELL STREET 613 S.F. N . 020554 LAMBERTVILLE, NJ 08530 &iOP 017 CUPOLA 124'-3" — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - PHONE: 609,397.3635 N SPECIFICATION OUTLINE TOP OF EXISTING RIDGEHEIGHT121'-7" ROOF: TOP OF NEW RIDGE 120'-4" 1 T T_ (MEAN HEIGHT OF EXISTING RIDGE 122-4 ) CEDAR SHINGLES, WEATHER NATURALLY. - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I L SIDING: IT CEDAR SHINGLES, WEATHER NATURALLY. TL__ If 11 _7 EXPOSED FOUNDATION: IT JL SMOOTH STUCCO. NEUTRAL EARTH TONE COLOR T.B.D. j TF _j -L -�� _ — _..__ A!� ` ' - - -- - -�-�� _�- �� MUNTIN BARS WI SPACER A ' LL,I I I JL T WALKWAYS: T' 7 7=T I L 4-7-- j !j BLUE STONE OR SIMILAR NATURAL STONE. F— T, IE 7— —1 -- lI � ..._i I I !F— L 1 1- J _�_i :1E I T__ i FIRST FLOOR 101'-11" _'T_L4_ 7-L-1 L 1 , -1--7 j (8' FLOOD COMPLIANT ELEVATION) LL_ L 1 1 m —TERRACE 101'-4"m ■m m ■m n m m m 0 1 flu -0 ■mi of no='a maim a "a 1� :0 E-1 m IiIiiiiim m:�'m m n m 111111M •n m ■� a a ■� ■0 ■m - -- - — - — - — - — - — d j I ------ j IL - ------I_ _1,___ --T 'j__T u 7 TF if NAVY STREET GRADE 100'-0" HIIIIIIIIIII FEMA 100 YEAR FLOOD — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - l_r I rrT"I MIM-1 I —NAVY STREET 100'-0" - - - - - - - - - - 6' ELEVATION_ fay U) 0 0 ry WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" 1'-0" 0 0 TOP OF EXISTING RIDGE HEIGHT 121'--7" — - — - — - — - — - — — - — - — - — - —- (MEAN HEIGHT OF EXISTING RIDGE 122-4") __Ll L ! ]L _LT-1-L t — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - TOP OF NEW BEDROOM RIDGE 113'-7" J4 _J T! T T -7- i -7 7 1 I L NO. DATE ATE BY DESCRIPTION J_ 7- 7 IT IS THE RESPONSIBLITlY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND COMPARE -j li L REVISIONS Ll FIRST FLOOR 101'-11" THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FLOOD COMPLIANT ELEVATION) BEFORE COMMENCING.ACTIVITIES,ERRORS, 8 12 a Imm" a a TERRACE 1011-4111-111 a a a Imam a w In m m w llll� m IIIIIIIIIIIIIII!!1E m m llllll� a mEm" m w somm OMMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES - - — - — - — - — - — - — - - NEW GRADE 100-11" DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE REPORTED TOTHEARCHITEC NAVY STREET 100'-0" IL T FMI 11 11 11 11 11 1 --.NA\NSTREET 0'-0 FEMA 100 YEAR FLOOD 16 III if 11�11�lmrr=lrlll w��I - 7-- — - __� --- - _,_ .� —_- �4- 6' ELEVATION -I'll u[1 11 11 11 PROJECT NAME PRINCIPLE DWELLING ADDITION &ALTERATIONS for VINCENT BERTAULT 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 DRAWING TITLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DATE 12.15.20 DRAWING NO. JOB NO. 1950 DRAWN DS SCALE:AS SHOWN BY: A-4 REVIEWED SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"= V-0" BY: GRO'C GARY R. O'CON � ARCHITECT, AIA K . q 8 CORYELL STREET020 ��. '. 020554 LAMBERTVILLE, NJ 08530 PHONE: 609.397.3635 , , Jf' ._---- P - _ 40, Y (r Y w .. p , , r frte„ ;,. . M, - Yr r.- R - ' z 0 O N - O I- N U r**-_ � N ~ Z CJS W Z � 0 Q CJ F-- U) VIEW NORTH FROM NAVY STREET VIEW SOUTH - WEST 0 0 F- 0 0 = z � -R If RECEIVED Lka/ ,i�, � '.� l. far f . �, -- � DEC 2 1 X20 K i Zoning B,,Id Of Appeals 1 1. _ 1 a , .,y 1+r NO. DATE BY a DESCRIPTION REVISIONS IT IS THE RESPONSIBLITIY OF THE CONTRACTOR , f y TO VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND COMPARE THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS k yy BEFORE COMMENCING.ACTIVITIES,ERRORS, OMMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES M X44' DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE REPORTED T" l TO THE ARCHITECT r �' yx 1' � PROJECT NAME PRINCIPLE DWELLING ADDITION &ALTERATIONS ,.. ,y r• ^ for a» ' VINCENT BERTAULT 95 NAVY STREET, ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 DRAWING TITLE PHOTOS WITH MARKERS DATE 12.15.20 DRAWING NO. I — JOB NO. 1950 a — DRAWN SCALE:AS SHOWN A-5 DS 0 VIEW SOUTH VIEW NORTH BRYVIEWED GRO'C ,6W) f 'w ' 1y1 �( COUNTY OF SUFFOLK OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE Steven Bellone SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE Natalie Wright Department of Commissioner Economic Development and Planning January 12, 2021 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals .53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Attn: Leslie Weisman Dear Ms. Weisman: Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A 14-14 thru A 14-25 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the'fbllowing application submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is,to be a matter foraocal determination as there appears to:be no significant county-wide or inter-community irr paets, A. decision of local determination should-not be construed_as either.an approval or: disapproval. Applicant 1Vlunicinal)EIe Number. Suffolk County.EnergyStorage H,LLC 47463 Bertault,Vincent N7,46" &746$SE Kreger;Michael .#7470. . Very truly yours, Sarah Lansdale Director of Planning r/� wd 4e R /�.� By Christine DeSalvo Theodore R.Klein,Principal Planner TRK/cd- Division of Planning&Environment H.LEE DENNISON BLDG 100-VETERANS MEMORIAL HWY,11th FI P.O.BOX 6100 HAUPPAUGE,NY 11788-0099 (631)853-5191' _ f .'y�9 ,. : {` ix x:n r rw.', "4- f Bim' .s�'+x �n' . � Y..i s t s, h•� � �,y i > FORM NO.3 ,.. R�CpIVED:. �:: 'a. , TOWN OF SOUTHOLD r :11 �' .' ', BUILDING"DEPARTMENT - QEC,2 Z SQUTH.OLD,N.Y. 0 NOTICE O. 11, ISAPPROVAL .��l�lrig I, I .t,Of APpeals` . . % . A O TE: October:22,2020 . TO: Ga y,O'Conner(Bertault) . ,.: 8,Corye11 Stree17-t .. Lambert,NJ:08530 11 Please take notice.that11 .1 I your application dated'October 14, 2020 1 For permit for additions and alterations to an existing sin lg a family dwelling construction of an in-ground sMminingpool construction of an accessory'pool house/cabana and the installation of a fence at ,, F Location of property 95 Naw Street, Orient NY {, „- r. I 'a County,'Tax Map No=.1000=Section 26 Block . 1 Lot 12 2 f,. ,. . .,� Is retu11 1.i 11rned herewith'and disapp"roved oq,tlie following grounds: __ The proposed`constriction on this non conforming 19 905 square foot lot with two front`.vards, in the Residential R�10 Distract, is not gerinitted`pursuant to"Article XXIII` Section 280-124,which states that;on lots measuring less than 20 000 sic uare feet in total size the minimum front yard setback is 35 feet° . , ., .The proposed construction(additions and,alterations to dwelling)notes a front yard setback of+/-3 feet. . 11 In addition the proposed"accessory`in ground swimming pool is not permitted p"ursiianf to pursuanfto Section 280-15 which states"that.accessory`structur'es shall belocated`fi.the required'iear-yard. The acceso ': - .. ;,, ming pool is noted as being located in the front 'Lard• .. All proposedzoonstruction is subject to Historic.Preservation Commission approval, pursuant to Section 170 of' the Southold Town Code . - 6 t 111 H t :: �, .f{ J 5 - 7 7 { , F P ; 11 �' { f { C AUthOrized Signature {" 4 L - x {E $, sS*;''fir` t t f Cc )�ile,ZBA,HPC ; `�r ��' � , °, € { 2 a }v j r �� a{ r� d e3y F t j .•7 a v 4 t{1 f 'f , , r > 7 F " t 7 i r t1 �1 ,s .. r r Y i t 2-s r5r�. Y' *�t,t jar r{ t�.f t�f 'r e S i t t �1 r { u ° ,i Y%tf ; rt".'zP 11" { 'L { ay r { x `� r i.�� x i e ,x K 7 { Yi " �* a 1 fir° ', r- g ��t �fic w r , r a3�r +^= :s ti r t ` 1{ef ate, £xJ ; , r ¢ 3�, w 4X 9'z` a„rx o s a Pi a { J� a x ��}r �'�a` tee y �A-;--,',,,,-,i .,*A S ' i+�I 1..d `� t -f$ } \ F j2 S S t L - �sYy� a t,f{?- r(J n' `S a+�in'€� J Y t;�i��y..� ��?!.k.# 'r� ca �� C 'I t #i si�vt�sr<: �. '"+ .y '. S tt v Fk. ,yy .tin 7-� z t � ,ljl 4's'.,-4,,, .j 5 1 y,vSt,h�y f,„ S�+ac s ;...��i n `� :� } rti t f e� s'i 3,rr mi a' .`dr{};-s ,'yd k h 3 C' r t r,'' a t Sit c� 'wCS \ ro { 'fur t .. �,�,HY� 'rd < {# � . s$`; 4 f 7�'xt ijsy ts"iSa, 7{z�:. +r -.�,r. r .l -r 9i a l l'i"'4s i!-! A , ,, s`'s� ..$�t x tg c'x^4:`0 �"d F �'•x4r!d /,;t }e ^Ex�'1-rx `Ys ! +-"�. 1 j ,- . " �� {" l'`+ct&�j :y'sy#.xn �± ::..>)Tx, �� - ��, �r"kt�+,,�f nd?..:a ,jfP^iso ft+,``t t. r t's: !'� " sy #Tz�rr �`3kyS�'�st g.s r,. is ; , 5: s,a tt k. s.n �' r 1 1" S a `� �' t K .}.. ,7�t'} x '� t ... .. r i s.�ysr > is"-. Y ^. £ f C4.c xk ra T 5 ! v,x c i F w ;'`�+� -ice',-"„ r s +yfr. `Sb�'H.3+u^s'yw Y?{ t sit• r ti 14, *,� i«t K�„s,s �t r r4 3't a,� ✓ ; a ?M:°t'Af'�1 s. � °ar, �' :'" ^td:�•C{sr`sr„.e.��.ti' s, �3. q. { +,ki.';r Fps: , 4 ."��,✓ad tr r I s ep'» 4 ", ��,�tiz� „„v �u ,�a' :,,,,,? 4Y'! f t 'n f •'e.,,{ k°�r,"," ,r�_«,^.� i z f.� f ` - 'r {.� •Ts 4:.�*. y� s ed C �°.: , ';yw xAn 1 1 t 1i ri �� Y. `4" > �7 ✓ ' rs...pari �: 3 a 3 r Ir-}t*Iw y ----11.3 1 ..`s`+.`'"r x-1'S3 4�`.: t ti .p..�" � +v t S7 t 'e 3"} s w is e ° i r Ca s�' t11 .. _xrv�,,l"I� u,'t'-`-xi'�.« fy�';��__ t�,. "..°H¢g, ';'v :,,.riSt".y ' ,, i..yagS ii i�,�::,z��Y 1x.+�.r"v�.,,'2 s _,� s:.€. r:.3'F'`„ 'S's� r, `:L+r"�` * a:`.yt 'Ff c��:.'..^:*'2�'W`' ,'"'3+�2g 'Y! rt�' { "r'uGCY_{tb {a'-p a 1 rF tv day l x±>.{L €.. "', 3�`t ,♦ ai.. *e5 '`-• , 2'_� a ,c {, e$ 3 '�3wrt��aa.•iY g-' '�" r ra'rfp'�, fs - ''�r gat 3Pv r�. ps.v ., t , n �'`5',? �'� �a 's'`,�'� F'"a �r4�✓tr J3'"��z. +.. ' ''^ r D ', i� e _ g�.fff RECEIVED DEC `212020 Fee:$ _Filed By: Assignment No. Zoning Board Of Appeals APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE House No. 95 Street Navy Street Hamlet Orient SCTM1000 Section 26 Block 1 Lot(s) 12,2 Lot Size 19 905 SF Zone R-40 I(WE)APPEAL THE WRITTENED DETERMINATION SRVEY/ TE PLAN BUILDING INSPECTOR N PEC�512TOR DATED 10/22/2020 BAS Owner(s): Mr.Vincent Bertault Mailing Address: P.O.Box 51 Orient NY 11957 Telephone: 917-667-4166 Fax: waEmail: vbertault(crhoo com NOTE:In addition to the above,please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agent,architect, builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative:Wickham,Bressler&Geasa,P.C.._for(x)Owner()Other: Address: 13015 Main Rd.,P.O.Box 1424 Mattituc[c NY 11952 Telephoner 631-298-8353 Fax: $565 Email: ebresslerCcr7wblawyers.com Please Bieck to specify tpho you ivisll correspondence to be mailed to,front fit above names: (x)Applicant/Owner(s), (x)Authorized Representative, () Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDINGINSPECTOR DENIEDOARN APPLICATIONN DATED 10/22/2020 SURVEY/SITE PLAN FOR: . DATED 9/I5/2020 an (x)Building Permit () Certificate of Occupancy ()Pre-Certificate of Occupancy () Change of Use ()Permit for As-Built Construction (X) Other:Building inspector instructed Applicant to file this appeal as to §280-13 Special Exception Variance—two level accessory apartment. Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed.(Indicate Article,Section,Subsection.of Zoning Ordinance by numbers.Do not quote the code.) Section: 280 Subsection: 13 15. 124 Article: III•30M Type of Appeal.An Appeal is made for: (x)A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. () A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ()Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section O Reversal or Other UNDER A prior appeal (x) has, () has not been made at an time with r(Ple se be sure to r seatclibefore (s Appeal No(s). Year completing dtis question or call our office for assistance) ZBAFile# 6729'. Name of Owner: Mr.Vincent Bertault 5218 Woodhouse RECEIVED DEC 2 12020 cling Bard REASONS FOR APPEAL (Please be specific, additional sheets m �r�3r c�F signature notarized) 1. An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because: A. As to Variance from §280-15, the proposed pool is technically located in a front yard but placed behind the house and barn on a through lot(Navy St. and Willow St.). The area will be landscaped and by its location not visible to the public. B. As to Variance from §180-124, the existing front yard set-back of the house is 1.08 feet at its closest, increasing to 2.72 feet. The proposed porch construction will be no closer than 2.72 feet and increases to more than 3 feet. This is not atypical of residences in the area, as many were built close to the property lines. The existing porch is being expanded to wrap around the house and a 630 SF two room addition is proposed on the rear of the house. There will be no adverse change to the character of the neighborhood, only an improvement as the porch will be further from the street. C. As to Variance from §280-13(b), 13(e): Whether the accessory apartment occupies one level or two is not relevant to the character of the neighborhood. Thus, the character will not change. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: A. As to the variance for the Pool: There is no provision in the Zoning Ordinance for through lot conditions creating a front yard for frontages on two streets. B. As to the variance for the House: The existing location of the principal dwelling predates the Zoning Ordinance. As noted in 1-13 above, the proposed porch construction will be no closer to the street than the farthest existing portion of the house and almost entirely further. There is no place else for a porch. C. As to the variance for the Accessory Apartment, the applicant has no alternative to an accessory apartment other than to move off of the property to an undetermined location while construction on the main residence occurs. The applicant has no other place to move to. 3. The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: A. As to the Pool: The property technically has two front yards. The property's physical front yard is on Navy Street upon which the front of the principal dwelling abuts. In this instance, unless relief is given no accessory structure could exist. Thus, relief is typically given such that accessory structures can exist. The relief is not substantial since the true front yard continues to exist without accessory structures and the other"front"yard is deemed to be a rear yard to accommodate accessory structures. The pool will be located 84.83 feet from Willow Street and 10.5 feet from the rear barn. B. As to the House: The house as existing is 1.08 feet from the front line at its closest. The proposed construction at the porch would be 2.72 feet from the front line at the closest and increasing to more than 3 feet. Since the porch addition structure would be no closer and generally farther from the streets the relief requested is not substantial. C. As to the Accessory Apartment: The total floor area of the proposed accessory apartment is within requirements. Substantiality should not be measured numerically in this instance as the applicant will be utilizing the space in the first instance. 4. The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood because: A. As to the Pool: As noted above, the pool is to be located between the house and accessory barn and will not be visible to the public. There are numerous other pools in the area. B. As to the House: The house is being preserved by lifting above the flood plain and managing structural deficiencies. The proposed porch enhancement and the proposed addition are consistent with the scale and material palette within the community and, if anything, these proposed adjustments are value added. The front yard set-back sought is consistent with many other residences in the area. C. As to the Accessory Apartment: Whether the proposed accessory apartment is one level or two is not relevant to relevant to the character of the neighborhood. 5. Has the alleged difficulty been self-created {X} Yes or { } No Why: A. As to the Pool: As to the pool, technically the difficulty is self-created since the property was purchased in 2005 after the zoning code was in effect. However, Applicants seeking relief B. As to the House: The non-conforming location of this residence as with many in the area predates the zoning ordinance. Consequently, any modification will require relief. C. As to the Accessory Apartment: Due to the existing configuration of the barn to be utilized as an accessory apartment there is room only for 439 square feet on the first floor and the remainder of 302 square feet must be located on the second floor, so as to maintain existing garage and workshop space. Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land {x} No { } Yes (please furnish a copy) RECEIVED t 21 DEC 2p p ollin9 Board Of APPeaOs This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and elfare of th mmunity. Signature f p scant or A thorized Sworn to before me this P day of December, 2020. RECEIVED 7407 Notary Public DEC 212020 Cheryl Simons Zoning Board Of Appeals ►Votary.Dhc State Qt 1ewYork Qualified In Suffolk DOW 20�� Commission Expires February .l OF SOUlyo �o �o Town Hall Annex Telephone(631)765-1802 54375 Main Road Fax(631)765-9502 P.O.Box 1179 RECEIVED Southold,NY 11971-0959 �Q y�OUNV, AUG 2 4 20 . 1 / 21 BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD STOP WORK ORDER TO: Vincent Bertault P.O. Box 51 Orient, New York 11957 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED TO SUSPEND ALL WORK AT: 95 Navy Street, Orient, New York TAX MAP NUMBER: 1000-26-1-12.2 Pursuant to Section 144=8 of the Town of Southold, New York, you are hereby . notified to immediately suspend all work until this order has been rescinded. BASIS OF STOP WORK ORDER: Construction beyond scope of BP 44198 issued 912312019. CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH WORK MAY BE RESUMED: When the Zoning Board of Appeals and Building Department have issued approvals for all changes. FAILURE TO REMEDY THE CONDITIONS AFORESAID AND TO COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF LAW MAY CONSTITUTE AN OFFENSE PUNISHABLE BY FINE IMPRI ONM TOR TH. DATE: August 24, 2021 o n Jar ki Se 'or uil in In ector IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL TO REMOVE T IS N .TI E I H T WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ISSUING AGENCY. I APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: Mr.Vincent Bertault DATE PREPARED: 11/112020 1:For-Demolition-of-Existing-Building-Areas -- Please describe areas being removed: The rear kitchen,utility and mudroom will be removed and rebuilt over the present footprint. II.New Construction Areas (New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensic s): RECEIVED Dimensions of first floor extension: i4'-0"x 35'-8" 7�� DEC 212020 Dimensions of new second floor: NA Dimensions of floor above second level: Height(from finished ground to top of ridge): 20'-4" Zoning Board Of Appeals Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed?If yes,please provide height.(above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: i'-n" III. Proposed Construction Description(Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary). Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations:Two story frame dwelling with one stoKy addition in rear housing kitchen,mud and.utility room.There is a covered porch across the front of the home. Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations:The house will be lifted and a new foundation compliant with FEMA installed. The number of floors remain unchanged.The I-story existing kitchen addition is in poor condition and will be re-built.A modest enlargement will add bedroom and bathroom along with a sunroom on the Ground Floor so the Owner may age in place. IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage (from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: 2.274 SF Proposed increase of building coverage: 1,157sF Square footage of your lot: 19905 SF Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: 172% V. Purpose of New Construction: 1.Lift Building above flood plain and install new foundation to be FEMA compliant. 2.Add ground floor Bedroom and Bathroom for the Owner so the Owner may age in place. 3.New pool for personal enjoyment. VI.Please describe the land contours(flat,slope%,heavily wooded,marsh area,etc.)on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): The existing land slopes from east to west at a gentle 1-2%slope and is not a factor in meetng the code regirements. Please submit 8 sets of photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking orners for new construction,and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR RECEIVED ZBA APPLICATION DEC2 1 mn _ A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes v No -- zon ng Board Of Appec11s B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? No x Yes please explain on attached sheet. In conjunction with lifting the house for flood plain compliance,we propose to raise the surroundng the grade simarlarly. C. l.) Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? 1\b 2.) Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? NA 3.) Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? NA 4.) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? NA Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? No E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting? None Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? Yes If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: Proposed Building Relocation(Barn). G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking, please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? No If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. 1. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel single Famiit Dwelling with accessory bam and shed and the proposed USe Same with proposed accessory apartment in garage new Dool and use ofshed for cabana. (ex: existing single family, proposed: same with garage, pool or other Authorized signature an Date r TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT REC�j TOWN CLERKLN 'S OFFICE �'aSOUTHOLD, NY DEC 1BUILDING PERMIT Zoning Board (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT.ON THE PREMISES WITH ONE SET OF APPROVED.PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) . Permit#: ':44198 Date: 9123/20.19. Permission is hereby granted to: Bertault, Vincent 320 E 18th St New York, NY 10003 To: Relocate an existing,barn.building and shed as applied for per Landmarks Preservation Commission Certificate of Appropriateness and ZBA approval, with flood permit. Two- ,. _COs required. . _ Replaces.BP#41328 At premises located at: 95 Navy St., Orient SCTIVI # 473889 Sec/Block/Lot# 26.-1-12.2 Pursuant to application dated 9/23/2019 and approved by the Building Inspector. To expire on 3/24/2021. Fees: PERMIT RENEWAL $315.40 Total: $315.40 Building Inspector FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector , Town Hall RECEIVED Southold.. N.Y. PRE EXISTING DEC 2 12020 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Zoning Board Oi Appeals No Z-30982 Date JUNE 15, 2005 THIS CERTIFIES that the. build•ing SEASONAL DWELLING Location of Property 95 NAVY STREET ORIENT House No. Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 26 Block 1 Lot 12.2 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Requirements for a Seasonal Dwelling built Prior to: APRIL. 9. 1957 pursuant to which CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NUMBER Z•30982 dated JUNE 15, 2005 was issued• and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is SEASONAL ONE FAMILY DWELLING & 2 ACCESSORY STORAGE BUILDINGS* The certificate is issued to JERILYN B. & JOHN H. WOODHOUSE (owners) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N/A PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED N/A *PLEASE SEE ATTACHED INSPECTION REPORT. 6 iit Inspe or Rev. 1/81 ZO/TO 39Cd S331snNi a-10HInDs TV9999LT£9 9T:TT PIOZ/LZ/10 l LOCATION! RECEIVED (>7umbcr&strcct) (tnuniclnntiry) � �- SUBA)<VIS><<�l�q Ki mi NO:: LOT(S): DEC 212020 NAME OF O'�'VNRR S): . T R. OCCUX'ANCY: (typo) (oK,a«cea�,c) Zoning Board Of Appeals A MIMED BY: ACC'ON;PANMy DY: IM,YAVAIIABLE: SUFF..Co .TAXNIAPN'0.1000- Z. SOURCE 611 AL, 1rST: BATE: 1"aY 4, DVIT.LLINO: T )FE Ol'COP;STRUCTIon SM F<IA1iS #STOWES: 2 ft XTs; 3 TOC1NDATIGN: r r p y S BMW CELLAR: CRA%VL SPACE.- TOTAL RQGl1TS: IST FI.R: 4 � 2ND MR 2 3RD Mu BATH tOOtit(Sp 'CIE TOILET ROOM(S): CITILI'TY Room:''�� PORCH T1'PE: DECK,TYPE: PATIO,TYPE: SRMEWA7': . FIREPLACE: GARAGE: AOAMST[C ROTWATER: YES 'TYPE HY'+AT� SP AYRCONDITIONLi TYPE HEAT:- IM WARM AYR: aOTtiVATER: O'PIak—.jWM TA K QFC iQ�Q 1 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES: G_APL GE,TIME OF CONST.: STORAGE,TYPE CONST.:_ 2 S MmtlNc I',90Li GUEST,TYPE CONST: OTUER: xIS 66 x VIOLATIONS: CHAPTER 4S 4:N.Y.STATE UNIFORANI FIRE PREVSN`CiON&BUILDING CODE LOCATION DESCRIPTION T. SEC. REMARKS: HP#315LZL--0=-23538 (&0SALT) BP0119bZ-C�'L30981 (CiOQt R�ADi) INSPECTED UY: DATE OF INSPECTION:- Mav 12, 2005, TMIE S TART: END:_ II_(1n AM Z0/Z0 3Jtld S3SIsn .L C[-IOHInDS TV9999LZ£9 9i:ti VZOZ/LZ/TO BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES WITH ONE SET OF APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) Permit#: 39186 Date: 9/15/2014 Permission is hereby granted to: RECEIVED Bertault, Vincent _ 1 to 320E 18th St ew York, IVY 10003 ------ - Zoning Board Of Appeals To: Relocate an existing barn building and shed as applied for per Landmarks Preservation Commission Certificate of Appropriateness and ZBA approval, with flood permit. Two COs required. At premises located at: 95 Naves., Orient SCTIVI # 473889 Sec/Block/Lot # 26.-1-12.2 Pursuant to application dated 10/24/2013_ and approved by the Building Inspector. To expire on 3/16/2016. Fees: ACCESSORY $458.80 ACCESSORY $172.00 CO -ACCESSORY BUILDING $50.00 C C—FS&QR�'BUILDING $50.00 Fl000-Pe�t $100.00 al: $830.$0 ng I, spe er— a 22�a� Doia b?e-Click ort Hfstor Mkt � �a. �♦��0 �t�st��y on this toaroet Ex y�y �--v ,.,:' *xe^-. ':::a^"...riv '«'w y-,x'!Y�, ,-vs -,��wz«;L✓� "rT,-„��, :' .... ,. e, .. ,, .. .a:.. n _.<,..-> y;*x <. .« .. ➢^.:= �:' i :•v3r n �1&r �r'a U�q �Ec� #:, •. c .` .M.a, �..:-.�zu.:.-,,...-.-.<f,w.,<...x:.ww'€�...a.<,..wa-c.,.zwu-a:�.,.u��t��„«+,��^xiw�...�..zm,,&"�' *: C%x,>:Sk, ,��",';i,'�r..,rtdr:�vT#� `s�s3' xic�dr+€-SEP�F'��'w�"� s d9�•�,d«U��',a,a[�„ ,'� �.�,� ��w�� . €a� ., -„ „...ax „Mx : ' 1211112020 �>�rn�plant 2G20� `Ct3�ls�"RU Bertsu�t��ar��er�t Con��r�ctid�r� c�itslde�t�e sco .. I�#�1FCUt�1DC)7 - 10111120 0 Applicetior�.#: ADD1T1€ 11 ..'Eert ult Vincent add/alt&isp need's dis PENDING < O/28/2020 013112020 Complaint:#:2020-... PROHIBIT.... 8arteult,Vincent running water inti, town drain ... CLOSED � 311�2r.120 3/11/2020 Corn leint#;2.020 �f1ISC LLA 8e . p. 9.. ,. rts,uitanrt Simi ��t eiri don., CLE v .� treno#iwr > D 1.216'2010 x12212020 C mple<int*.20%9 ., 0014 TRU,.. Eertiaults `in. ent, Construction �itl7 out permit CLOSED v, 912312010 Permit#.44°198'. ACCE.SSC . :'Berk trig Jncent fel tete en existing barn buil,.. OPEN. . �x. :r.. .... IIM2017” Permit#. 1329 A CE SO....Eerteult, lh ent. Exp red:S.0 8P01 X4199 Pal...,.�_�PIRCCO:.n.,., « 112312017 112712017 Complaint M17-.b.. UNSAFE ... . aertaiilt�Vincent. Thi' oFice has received comp... CLCS�__..�. ..,. 1016112016 1011412010 Complyint. ;2016-,.. UNSAFE;.... Berteu t,'�lii cent Cobipiei,t c�fthe.barn.beinv u,. CLOSED UP 911 2014 Permit :391 A,CCE SJ..,.Berteult� lnc«tirit e p r I. ee 4132aRa ocate a.. EE PiRCD w V'Bert ulk Vincent 112812014 411912014 AREAVARIANCE AREA VAR... Grant in Pert,,, 111 112013 121121201"� Cornpleint #:2013 ... -0-.U-'M—P' Il�ii B rt uit., arrcer t Complaint of brush piled'on r.., CLOSED w Applics"tion : ACCES t3... Bertault, Vincent Relocate an existing barn buil .. WRITf'EN - .. ,....... - N+ ...-„.,... .. ,G'” A. P•± SSS, II'�YZ'ni'v e'4'ue d�sK °r.-m." kax,.dr,':Es� 'ass +.,: «. v< to O � Q n fl ►'� 6-- m o Normo -a o -o Ln - o��p�SO(/j�ol .. Telephone (631)-765-1802 O Town Hall,53095.Route 25 Fax (631)7659502 ` P.O Boz 1179 'Southold,New York 11971-0959 OUTH S OLD.TOWN ... . .. ... :. • t . . )�ANDMARK P�SEI�'VATiQN COMMISSION.: � ., . RESOLUTIENC 17 .E 17 14 June 18,2014 2 X 220 D :. Certificate of Arpranrlatepess - - Zoning Board Of Appeals RE: 95 Navy Street,Orient,S.CTM#1000-26442.2 Owned Y�n�ent Be�aitlt:.,. ._ . ... . . .. ....... . ._�. . .. . . . • RESOLUTIOhT ON :. ...... _ . _ WHEN 95 ! M $S, N� Streets Q,neq QTY is on the 1'oRr�t of i quthold?New York State and: ,NationalegastenfIllstone WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 56 7.(b)of the Town Law(Landmarks Preservation Code),; Of the.Town of Southold,.all:proposals for materialchangelalteration must be :. eveved aiud granted aetifi+r, te of ApproprateiressgbytheS� t>otTom :.-.. .. Landmarks Preservation Commission prior to the issuance of a Building,P.e mit, and WHEREAS, an application was submitted to relpcate an epoging Accessory barn ta an F accessory shed on February. WHEREAS Commissioners met with the applicant to review the proposed project cid 15,2014,and WHEREAS, a public hearing for the purpose of considering approval'of the proposal was held- ,:.,::�::-•'° WHEREAS, the proposed relocation of the historic barn and shed, according to the plans submitted,will result in the structures being restored,and preserved as is,and WHEREAS, the proposed relocation.of the bani and stied will afford the appl7caut the abilit3► .- ----•to ma)irriize the use of his property while preserving the.character of the WHEREAS; the relationship between the exxstmg barn structure and the mann dwelling was significantly altered when;the pzoperty.,was previously subdivided with Southold Town Planning Board aplYQval;and WHEREAS, there are longstanding precedentsfor relocating such historic structures throughout the Hamlet of Orient and-the Town of Southold, and. WHEREAS, the new front yard,locatzon of thebarn structure(facing Willow Street)is in keepingwith other properties m.the surioundhlg area `and WHEREAS, the proposed relocation of the bam structure was approved by the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appealssw(#6,29)on April`1?;2014 and. WHEREAS- the applicant has agreed to make a good faith effort to preserve the property's existing trees andshrubs(gartietilarly°tehholl j�:trees)during the relocation process,and WHEREAS, a letter was submitted to the Landmarks Preservation Commission on July 30, 2014,by Michael Johnson,of Johnson. Ci`,','0 nerit,outliiitu9 how to-pi�c tect ahe willow tiee.adjacent to the proposed location of the barn structure:The letter- will be part of the applicant's final building permit application and,it appears that the project requires no further review, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the Southold Town Landmarks Preservation Cominissi€�n determines'th l th t'oposal as otitl%ned u lilans'dated'October Y ,2013;n '.d: amended•on January 21,.2014,orrMay 2 '$Wand list mended b lune 11 2014,.by Gary R VCL onner,architect,meet the criteria for approval under.Section 170-8(A).of the Southold T wn CoIt des 7 BE IT>FURTHER'RESOT VERS'that the 6W!i ss�t ti-approves thequ reest fora Certifieate.of . Appropiateriss. MOVER:James Grathwohl,Chairman RECEIVED SECONDS James Gaetson,Commissioner' AYES.Surchin,Parker,Feder, GarretsoL`Gratliwohl DEC 2 1 2020 NAIES ABSTAINED .Webb Zoning Board Of Appeals RESULT:APPROVED Please note that any deviation from the approved plans refeeeneed'abovemay` e'quire further reviewfrom the commission. Signe . Ja es F.Grat ohl, Chairman,Landmarks Preservation Comiiiiss o i='"'" Date: TBD BOARD MEMBERS U Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson 'of SaTye! 53095 Main Road,P.O.Box 1179 O Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantes Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning �►O • �O 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider �,�'`,O Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net RE El ED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS fi 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APR 2 5 2 4 , Tel.(631)765=1809-Fax(631)765-9064 Q So hold Town Clerk RECEIVED FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION ! '7 � 'I MEETING OF APRIL 17,2014 DEC 212020 ZBA FILE: 6729 NAME OF APPLICANT: Vincent Bertault Inning Board Of Appeals PROPERTY LOCATION: 95 Navy Street(adj.to Willow Street)Orient,NY. CTM#1000- SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. LWRP DETERMINATION: The relief, permit, or interpretation requested in this application is listed under the Minor Actions exempt list and is not subject to review under Chapter 268. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property is a 19,905 sq. ft. in the R-40 Zone. The northerly lot line measures 65.93 feet along Willow St., plus 54.53 feet along an adjacent residential parcel. The easterly lot line measures 154.15 feet along a residential parcel. The southerly lot line measures 103.57 feet along Navy St., and the westerly lot line measures 207.70 feet along another parcel. The properly is improved with a single family dwelling, and two accessory structures (a barn and a shed), as shown with the existing, and the proposed, new accessory structure locations, on the survey drawn by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. dated Dec. 12. 2012, and the site plan A.I drawn by Gary R.O'Connor,dated Oct. 18,2013. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variance from Article III Section 280-15 and the Building Inspector's October 15,20I3,Renewed January 24, 2014 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for relocation of existing accessory barn and shed,at; 1)accessory barn and shed proposed in a location other than the code required rear yard. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to move two accessory structures from existing nonconforming front yard locations, to a new nonconforming front yard location. The code requires all accessory structures, except in the case of waterfront parcels, be located in the rear yard. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The applicant's property is a through lot with frontage on two streets, and therefore has two front yards and no rear yard. The subject barn is estimated to have been built at some time in the 1920's, and the shed was also built at some time prior to the enactment of the Town Zoning Code. The applicant wishes to preserve and restore both accessory structures and to relocate them to eliminate the current need to drive cars over the existing septic system and to create more open space for gardening and recreation in the center of his property. The file contains two letters of objection submitted by an agent of adjacent neighbors stating some concerns regarding the applicant's proposed project. The neighbor's agent submitted written information on the history of the subject property. The applicant's proposed project is subject to the review and approval by the Town RECEIVED Page 2 of 3 April 17,2014 DE C 2 20 ZBA#6729—Bertault SCTM#1000-26-1-12.2 Zoning Board Of Appeals Landmark Preservation Committee. The applicant submitted a letter dated March 13, 2 rapestrlg-ta-r the barn with a 25 foot front yard setback from Willow Street instead of the 20 feet setback as originally proposed. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on March 6,2014,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law 5267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variances to relocate two accessory structures,an existing,historic barn and shed from pre-existing, non-conforming front yard areas into new, non-conforming front yard locations will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant's property is located in an historic district that includes numerous buildings, including both principal dwellings and accessory structures, with non-conforming setbacks; all situated in locations that pre-date zoning. Many accessory structures are located in front yard areas.The average building front yard setback on Willow St. is estimated to be approximately +4 feet. The average front yard setback on Navy St. is estimated to be approximately+17 feet. The applicant proposes to re-locate the barn with a front yard setback from Willow Street of 25 feet and the shed with a front yard setback of 39.6 feet, and a 15 foot side yard setback on this irregularly shaped lot. The subject structures have valid pre-existing CO's, and the applicant's project must have the approval of the Town Landmark Preservation Committee. 2, Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The applicant's property is located between two streets, creating two front yards and the parcel has no conforming rear yard area. Therefore,the re-location of the two pre- existing accessory buildings to any other on-site location requires the granting of variances. 3. Town Law 4267-bQ)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial, representing 100% relief from the code for the accessory structures proposed front yard locations, instead of code required rear yards locations. However, this is mitigated by the fact that these two structures already exist in non-conforming front yards because this property has two front yards and no rear yard location in which to move the structures, and also because of the pre-existing non-conforming status of these two structures each with a valid CO. 4. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. 5. Town Law 4267-b(3 (b) )(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel in 2005, after the Zoning Code was in effect, and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6. Town Law &267-b. Grant of the variances is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of moving two pre-existing, non-conforming accessory structures to new non- conforming locations, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Horning, seconded by Member Goehringer,and duly carried,to GRANT,the variance for the shed as applied for and shown on the survey drawn by Peconic Surveyors,P.C.dated Dec. 12.2012,and the site plan A.1 drawn by Gary R.O'Connor,dated Oct. 18,2013,and Page 3 of 3 April 17,2014 RECEIVED ZBAN6729—Bertault SCTMN 1000-26-1-12.2 DENY,the variance request for the barn as applied and, DEC 20 0 GRANT ALTERNATIVE RELIEF, for a 25 foot setback from Willow Str�e&00_ 91140 10pq a'�s relocation,as proposed by the applicant in a letter dated March 13,2014, subject to the flo owing`corrdition; . CONDITION: 1. The granting of the variances are contingent upon the applicant securing the approval by the Town Landmark Preservation Committee for the proposed project, if the application is denied by the Landmark Preservation Committee then this decision shall become null and void, That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued, Before annlvine for a building permit, the applicant or agent must submit to the Board of Appeals for approval and filing, two sets of the final site plan or survey conforming to the alternative relief granted herein. The ZBA will forward one set of approved, stamped drawings to the Building Department. Failure to follow this procedure may result in the delay or denial of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or,architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variances) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action, The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: ,oyes: Members Weisman (Chairperson), Schneider, Horning, Goehringer, Dantes. This Resolution was duly adopted(5-0). CL41r- Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson Approved for filing lad /2014 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS -' ®� �( RECf-IVP 1 4(o7 S uthold Town Hall Lydia A.Tortora,Chairwoman ® �� DEC % 12020 3095 Main Road Gerard P. Goehringer ca P.O. Box 1179 George Homing ® gl,,New York 11971-0959 Ruth D. Oliva �® �® ning Board Of A�� Fax(631)765-9064 Vincent Orlando Telephone(631)765-1809 htip://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS RECEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 3: i1 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION AY MEETING OF APRIL 17, 2003 Appl. No. 5218—JOHN AND JERILYN WOODHOUSE Southold Town Clerk Property Location: 225 Navy Street, Orient; CTM 1000-26-1-12 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicants' property is a 42,154 sq. ft. parcel with 229.80 feet along the north side of Navy Street and 133.09 feet along the east side of Bay Avenue (a/k/a Main Street or Village Lane). The property is improved with four buildings: (a) single-family, 1-1/2 story frame house and accessory frame garage on the westerly portion, and (b) single-family, two-story frame house and accessory frame building on the easterly portion, detailed on the map prepared 9-22-98, revised 11-04-02 by John C. Ehlers, L.S. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's August 15, 2002 Notice of Disapproval, amended December 16, 2002 and December 24, 2002, citing Section 100- 30A.3 in its denial of applicants' August 14, 2002 application. The reasons stated in the denial is that the sizes of the two lots, as proposed, are not permitted because the Zoning Code Bulk Schedule requires 40,000 sq. ft. of total area and a lot width of 150 feet. Also noted in the denial is that the merger law would not apply to-'the property in question, and the Building Department removed references to nonconforming setbacks noted in the previous disapprovals. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on February 20, 2003 and April 3, 2003, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicants are requesting variances under Section 100-30A.3, Bulk Schedule, for the following: (a) lot area of proposed Lot 1 of 22,250 sq. ft. and lot width of 144.09 along Navy Street; (b) lot area of proposed Lot 2 of 19,904 sq. ft. and lot width of 85.71 feet along Navy Street. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: On April 3, 2003, the applicants confirmed an amendment to this application requesting area variances for a minor subdivision application to the Planning Board, rather than a lot-line change. Page 2—April 17,2003 Appl. No.5218—J. and J.Woodhouse RECEIVED 26-1-12 at Orient 0� D 212020 Zoning Board Of Appeals REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of an area variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. Applicants request area variances for a minor subdivision resulting in two lots, each with a dwelling. The dwellings were built before 1957, the effect date of zoning, and are located in a historic district. At the hearings, no objections or concerns were raised by any of the adjacent or contiguous neighbors regarding the proposed area variances. The neighborhood is very developed consisting of many preexisting, non-conforming parcels approximately equal in size to the applicants' proposed lots and will not result in a significant increase in the density of the neighborhood. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than area variances for a minor subdivision. The lot sizes as proposed are almost equal in size and are not able to be created without the requested area variance relief. 3. The relief as requested is substantial. Although the lot sizes are less than conforming, they are larger than lots existing in the neighborhood. 4. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that the proposed lot size variances will have an adverse impact on physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed variances will not have an adverse. effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood, or district because there will be no increase in density. Each will contain a dwelling and accessory garage (which are existing). 5. The alleged difficulty for the applicants is. self-created, since the applicants seek to create Lots 1 and 2 with nonconforming lot sizes. 6. The relief offered to this applicant is the minimum necessary for the applicants to enjoy the benefit of conveying land for each house, by separate deeds, while at the same time protecting and preserving the character of the neighborhood, as well as the health, safety, and welfare of the surrounding community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Chairwoman Page 3—April 17,2003 Appl. No. 5218—J.and J.Woodhouse 26-1-12 at Orient RECi`VED L+ . DEC 212020 Zoning Board Of Appeals Tortora, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried, to GRANT the Variances in this proposed minor subdivision, and shown on the map prepared by John C. Ehlers, L.S. dated 9-22-98, amended 11-4-02. This action does-not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Tortora (Chairwoman), Goehringer, Horning, and Orlando. (Absent was Member Oliva.) This Resolution w d ted (4-0). Ly Ii A. Tortora, Chairwoman-Approved for Filing 5/ 22/03 RECEIVED -1 �1 DEC 12020 AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Zoning Board Of Appeals TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This fora:must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plat:approval, use variance,area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feel of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239nn and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant: Vincent Bertault 2. Address of Applicant: 95 Navy Street PO Box 51, Orient,NY 11957 3. Name of Land Owner(if other than Applicant): 4. Address of Land Owner: 95 Navy Street, Ori nt NY 11957 5. Description of Proposed Project: Change in use from Bam(Storage)to Barn with Accessory Apartment. 6. Location of Property:(road and Tax map number)_ 95 Naw St. 1000 26 01 12.2 _ 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? { } Yes {x} No 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? { } Yes {x}No 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s)of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff,it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office (765-1937)or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use the back of this page if there are additional property owners) 10 / 09 / 2020 Signature of Applicant Date Note: 1.The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2.Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3.Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. 617.20 , Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Comuletine Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 -Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: RECEIVED Bertault Residence I t+4 Cr 9. 1 7 9 Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY 1957 Zoninq Board Of Appeals Brief Description of Proposed Action: Proposed accessory apartment in an existing accessory structure. (barn) on 2 floors (special Exception) Proposed additions and alterations to existing single family " dwelling and construction of a swimming pool (variance) Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 1— 917-667-4166 Vincent Bertault E-Mail: vbertault@yahoo.com Address: 95 Navy Street City/PO: State: Zip Code: Orient P.O Box 51 NY 111957 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that x may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: Buildings for construction,HPC for certificate of appropriateness x 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? i-5 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? :05 acres' c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban ❑Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ®Residential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Aquatic ❑ Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 4 €t°�1"IVC-_1, 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ��` � � x b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? • x 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant chsm4pfess exisEir3gb ! ` tural NO YES landscape? 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: x 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? x x c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES' If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: x 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method.for providing potable water: x. 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: Private septic system. x- 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? b.Is theproposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? x x 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? x If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: x 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply:Shoreline ❑Forest Agricultural/grasslands [3 Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland ❑Urban ❑Suburban r16. :by oes the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? X Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES X 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑NO❑YES x b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ❑NO ❑YES Page 2 of 4 18. Does the proposed action include cc.....action or other activities that result in the impounument of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)?If Yes,explain purpose and size: X 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility?If Yes,describe: X 20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste?If Yes,describe: X I AFFIRM T AT THE INFO MA PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNO W LEDG Applicant/spon or name: nt Bert It ------- Date: Signature: 2-1-oL/— oGw Part 2- Impact Assessment.The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2.Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer-slrett-kFbe-guided-b�-tI ncept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the propose I action?"RECENED DEC 2 1 2020 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact Zoning Board Of Appeals may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a.public/ private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, waterbodies,groundwater, air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 r ` No,or Moderate small to large DEC 2 2020 impact impact may may occur occur 10.Will the proposed action result in an increase in the �o r r drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3.Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts.Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring,duration, irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude.Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) L q i Vincent Bertault Variance: Accessory structure(pool) in front yard; front yard setback(porch) Special Exception: 2 story accessory apartment in barn Property Address: 95 Navy St., Orient,NY 11957 #1000- Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM RECEIVED A. INSTRUCTIONS 4-0 1.All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies,shall complete this CCAF r(� Q2Q proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Revi w La . His assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Buildi rftrt�t.Board Of Appeals and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C,the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list,policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program.A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes",then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law.Thus,the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary,modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website(southoldtown.northfork.net),the Board of Trustees Office,the Planning Department,all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000— 026.00-01.00-012.002 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board Planning Dept. Building Dept. Board of Trustees ZBA X 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) X - (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: Construction of swimming pool in front yard; addition of porch to residence within front yard setback; construction of accessory apartment on two floors in barn. Location of action: 95 Navy Street, Orient, NY 11957 Site acreage: 19,905 sq ft; .5 acres Present land use: Residential Present zoning classification: R-40 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: 1 D:i (a)Name of applicant: Vincent Bertault(b) Mailing address: PO Box 51, Orient,NY 11957(c) Telephone number: Area Code (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? NO If yes, which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes No (Not Applicable) YES. This project makes efficient use of infrastructure by a) allowing utilization of a small area to expand an open porch and to expand the rear area of the house, and adds an accessory apartment to an existing building with no exterior expansion. Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes No (Not Applicable) NOT APPLICABLE Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes No (Not Applicable) YES The proposed porch expansion will blend with the existing porch, and it's longest dimension runs to the rear of the property. The rear additions and renovations to the residence are consistent with the historical character of the area. The pool will not be visible from the street, and is buffered from the neighbor's residence by the neighbor's driveway, garage, and a hedge. The conversion of a part of the existing barn to apartment will not be an adverse change to the exterior view. NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes No (Not Applicable) NO—The residence will be raised to decrease the impact of flooding Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes No (Not Applicable) YES —all sanitary facilities will be approved by the Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services or are exempt from its review. Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including 2 14 r Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes No (Not Applicable) NOT APPLICABLE Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III— Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III—Policies a R V for evaluation criteria. Yes No (Not Applicable) NOT APPLICABLE DEC 212020 Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from soli asIg mrd Of Appeals hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 tHrougli _3or evaluation criteria. Yes No (Not Applicable) NOT APPLICABLE PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes No (Not Applicable) NOT APPLICABLE WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Yes No (Not Applicable ) NOT APPLICABLE Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes No Not Applicable NOT APPLICABLE Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. Yes No Not Applicable NOT APPLICABLE Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes No (Not Applicable)— Not applicable. 3 RECEIVED DEC 212020 Board of Zoning A eats Application Zoning Board Of Appeals AUTHORIZATION (Where the Applicant is not the Owner) Vincent Bertault re s i d 1 n g a t 95 Navy Street,Orient,NY 11957 (Print property owner's name) (Mailing Address) do hereby authorize Wickham,Bressler&Geasa,P.C. (Agent)to apply for variance(s)on my behalf from the Sout old Zoning Board of Appeals. (Owner's igna re Vincent Bertault (Print Owner's Name) APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action—_—__ is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME : Bertault, Vincent (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION:(Check all that apply) RECEIVED Tax grievance Building Permit Variance x Trustee Permit L-Zatng EC 1 2020 Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Special Exception PlanninBoard Of Appe�is Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest. "Business interest"means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO x If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted thitd 0 Signature Print Name �/,��e,�f /'f�111114 AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOURNAME : Bressler, Eric J. (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) RECEIVED TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) J Tax grievance Building Permit 10 Variance X Trustee Permit DEC 1 2020 Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Zoning Board Of Appeals ------------------------- Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 21st d y: fDecember,20 20 Signature Al Print Name Eri J. Bressler �rA•��" �� 1 '{��;int>� �` ` _ • � " e�, s%�,tA� s; �' �Y \ 3 \� � ,.illi•}, �, �i�/�i@ , •i �==___ �_ - ��, `. ��'', �i 'r�f��„ ,..,��,,. ._ � mow_ At t t � 3• �. ~_�'9` ��,1--:i fir! // . p� 3�\ `t tv c�*�� x s �;ash _gin»-a �'� � :�"�' - �"�"•�,:r �'°'.� a l+: � - d � .y a �.- � ♦.. �,. a ,# �, A,J ,�' "'-+..A.:�: a�• ;..,. t>�� gat +,v lot i f ;r y., s s,� r r ,. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECOR OWNER STREET VILLAGE DIST.1 SUB. LOT VV ;CMCJ �b tit 5 1 FORMER OWNER N E ACR.Y-5' ` ID r w S W TYPE OF BUILDING -0 RES. w SEAS. VL. FARM COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value LAND Y IMP./� TOTAL DATE REMARKS (zoo 1} 160o / 1213 f.,; / ' l �l'�1 ( f' J .{ 'gym © ce c r AGE l BUILDING CONDITION NEW NORMAL I BELOW ABOVE M. FARM Acre Value Per Value 07 m Acre M. ^',mw Tillable FRONTAGE ON WATER p r~v 6 rn D •N Woodland FRONTAGE ON ROAD o Meadowland DEPTH House Plot BULKHEAD Total DOCK i ■■■■■■■■■■■■■NEE■■�1■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■MEMO■■■ ►�■■■■ -- , - - EMM■ME■■■■■■■EE■■0 ■■a =ZMMMM ■NNIMMI OEM I■■■ ■®■Iii■■■■■■■■ MUMMER I saw& IME ■■■■SEE■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■ IEOE■■"E■ ■■■ : .. a■■■■SIE■■■IM■■ENONE i ! ■no■ �■® ©■moi■i�■e■■ ■EE■■EMEMIN ■ r. • LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER& GEASA, P.C. ' 13015 MAIN ROAD, P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A. WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565 ebressler@wbglawyers.com December 21, 2020 RECEIVED� Hand Delivered DEC 2 12020 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road, Post:Office Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Attn: Ms. Donna Westermann Re: Property owned by Vincent Bertault 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York-SCTM# 1000-026.00-01.00-012.002, ("Premises") Ladies and Gentlemen: We are the attorneys for Vincent Bertault and write with respect to relief requested from the Zoning Board of Appeals The Building Inspector has issued a Notice of Disapproval with respect to proposed construction on the Premises stating that the proposed construction/renovation does not meet the Town's requirements pursuant to Article XXIII, Section 180-15 and Section 280-124. We are seeking variances from such sections. In addition, on a companion application, our client seeks a special exception for an accessory apartment in an accessory structure on the Premises and in connection therewith is seeking a variance from Section 280-13 in order to have the accessory apartment on two floors. Accordingly, we enclose the following papers, in eight sets, in connection with the Notice of Disapproval dated October 22, 2020: 1. Copy of Notice of Disapproval dated October 22, 2020; 2. Application to Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals; 3. Applicant's Project Description; 4. Questionnaire for Filing ZBA Application; 5. Pre-existing Certificate of Occupancy; 5. Agricultural Data Statement; 6. Short Environmental Assessment Form; 7. Consent of Owners; 8. Applicant/Owner Transactional Disclosure Form; 9. Agent/Representative Transactional Disclosure Form; 10. LWRP Consistency Assessment Form; 11. Photos; RECEIVED 12. New Survey; �7 Lt(,1 13. Building Plans; DEC 2 12020 14. Town Property Card; 15. Appeal fee in the amount of$1,500.00. �orp�ng Baard Ofgppeals Please schedule this matter at your next available hearing. Very 4Br o rs, Eric Jler EJB/cs Ends. xJFFO(,�co ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE,MMC hyo l/$ Town Hall,53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK C P.O.Box 1179 CIO Southold,New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS p • Fax(631)765-6145 MARRIAGE OFFICER y� Telephone(631)765-1800 �► RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER www.southoldtownny.gov OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Elizabeth A. Neville DATED: December 31, 2020 RE: Zoning Appeal No. 7467 Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeals No. 7467 for Vincent Bertault(Opties & Dinghies Inc. _,/Notice(s) of Disapproval _,-The Application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Applicant's Project Description Questionnaire �Correspondence- 12_11_1/I_o J-c-4. -c r +o Z B,4 Certificate(s) of Occupancy Building Permit(s) Misc. Building Dept. forms (Certificate of Compliance, Housing Code Inspection, etc.) Misc. Paperwork- _ 2019 �� L-c.��.✓ Copy of Deed(s) ,/Findings, Deliberations and Determination Meeting(s) Agricultural Data Statement Short Environmental Assessment Form __,/Board of Zoning Appeals Application Authorization Action of the Board of Appeals _Applicant/Owner Transactional Disclosure Form(s) Agent/Representative Transactional Disclosure Form(s) LWRP Consistency Assessment Form Photos Property Record Card(s) Maps Survey/Site Plan _Drawings Town of Southold v" P.0 Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 12/31/20 Receipt#: 277015 Quantity Transactions Reference Subtotal 1 ZBA Application Fees 7467 $1,500.00 Total Paid: $1,500.00 Notes: Payment Type Amount Paid By CK#1111 $1,500.00 Opties & Dinghies Inc. Southold Town Clerk's Office 53095 Main Road, PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Name: Bertault,Vincent(Opties & Dinghies Inc.) 95 Navy St PO Box 51 Orient, NY 11957 Clerk ID: JENNIFER Internal ID:7467 y AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Suffolk Times LEGAL NOTICESOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALSTHURSDAY, MARCH 4,2021 at 10:00 AMPUBLIC HEARINGSThis PUBLIC HEARING will be held virtually via the-Zoom online platform, Pursuant to Executive Order 202.1 of New York Governor Andrew Cuomo in-person access by the public will not be.permitted.The public will have access to view,listen and make comment during the meeting as it is happening via Zoom Webinar. Details about how to tune in and make comments during the meeting are on the Town's website agenda for this meeting which may be viewed at http://www.southoldtownny.gov/agendacenter. Additionally,there will be a link to the Zoom Webinar meeting at http://www.southoldtownny.gov/calendar.aspx.10:00 A.M.-JIM BRODSKY#7466-Request for a Variance from Article III,Section 280-15 and the Building Inspector's December 2,2020,Amended December 8,2020 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct an accessory garage in conjunction with a new single family dwelling;at 1)located in other than the code permitted rear yard;located at:1895 Pequash Avenue,Cutchogue,NY.SCTM No.1000-103-7-15.10:10 A.M.- VINCENT BERTAULT#:7MR-Request for Variances from Article.III,Section 280-15;Article XXIII,Section 280-124;and the Building Inspector's October 22,Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling,and construct an in ground swimming pool;at 1)proposed additions located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet;2)the accessory swimming pool is located in other than the code permitted rear yard;located at:95 Navy Street,Orient,NY.SCTM No.1000-26-1-12.2.10:20 A.M.-VINCENT BERTAULT #7468SE-Applicant requests a Special Exception.under Article 111,Section 280-13B(13). The Applicant is . owner of subject property requesting authorization to establish an Accessory Apartment in an existing accessory structure;at:95 Navy Street,Orient,NY.SCTM#1000-26-1-12.2.10:30 A.M.-SAMUEL J. DIMEGLIO,JR. #7469-Request for Variances from Article XXIII,Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's November 17,2020,Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct a front porch addition attached to an existing single family dwelling;at 1)located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet;2)located less than the code required minimum combined side yard setback of 25 feet;located at:2280 Deep Hole Drive,(Adj.to Deep Hole Creek) Mattituck;NY.SCTM No.1000-123-4-6.10:40 A.M:-MICHAEL KREGER#7470:7 Request for a Variance from Article III;Section 280-13 and the Building Inspector's January 6,2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling; at 1)more than the code permitted maximum two and one-half(2-1/2)stories;located at:985 Bay Shore Road,(Adj.to Pipe's Creek)Greenport;NY.SCTM No.1000-53-3-13.1.10:50:A.M.-ROBERT AND DONNA DRUMMOND #7471-Request for Variances from Article III,Section 28045;Article XXIII, Section 280-124;and the Building Inspector's December 16,2020,Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to legalize an"as built"deck addition with hot tub attached to a single family dwelling,and to legalize an"as built"accessory shed;at I)-."as built"deck is located less than the code required minimum side yard setback of 10 feet;4"as built"shed is located in other than the code permitted rear yard;located at:675 Private Road#12,(Adj.to Corey Creek)Southold,NY.SCTM No. 1000-87-4-7.1:00 P.M.-cOTTAGE ON THIRD,LLC#7472-Request for a Variance from Article XXIII, Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's January 13,2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct a new accessory pool house/garage;at 1)more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%;located at:850 Third Street,Greenport,NY,SCTM No.1000- 117-8-7.1-.10 P.M.DAVID ZAPPULLA#7473-Request for Variances from Article XXIII,Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's December 23,2020,Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to demolish and reconstruct a new single-family dwelling;at 1)located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet;2)more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%;located at:810 Linnet Street,Greenport,NY.SCTM No. 1000-48-3-13.1:20 P.M.- JAMES AND LAURIE CARNEY #7474-Request for Variances from Article XXIII,Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's December 15,2020 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to 377e8c50-e53d-42ee-95fb-6d18cb3aafee kimf@southoldtownny.gov SOUTHOLD TOWN BD OF APPLS 370 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Suffolk Times construct additions-and alterations to existing single family dwelling;at 1)located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet;2)located less than the code required minimum rear yard setback of 35 feet;located at:No#Equestrian Avenue,Fishers Island;NY.SCTM No. 1000-9-6- 3.1:30 P.M.,-CHRISTOPHER AND.-MARIAN BRIGGS#7477-Request for Variances from Article III,Section 280-15;Article XXIII,Section 280-124;and the Building Inspector's January 25,2021 Notice of Disapproval based on.an application for a permit to.legalize"as built"deck additions to an existing single -family dwelling and to legalize an "as built!'accessory shed;at 1)as built s.lied is located in other than the code permitted rear yard;2)as built deck is located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 40 feet;3)as built deck is located less than the code required minimum rear yard setback of . 60'feet;located at:320.Oceanic Avenue,Fishers.Island,NY.$CTM No.1000-9-7-9.1.1:40 P.M.- KONSTANTINOS DIAKOVASILIS#7465SE—(Adjourned from-February 4,2021)Applicant requests a Special Exception under Article III,Section 280-136(13). The Applicant is owner of subject property requesting authorization to establish an Accessory Apartment in an existing accessory structure;at: 2095 Ruth Road,Mattituck,,NY.SCTM#1000-106.-7-6.1:50 P.M.-SUFFOLK COUNTY ENERGYSTORAGE 11,LLC#7463SE—(Adjourned from February 4,2021)Request for a.Special.Exception-pursuant to Article XU,Section 280-62B(5),the applicant is requesting permission to construct and allow for-public utility structures and uses;i.e.,battery energy storage systernifacility;located at 69430 Main Road(NYS Route 25),Greenport,NY SCTM No.1000-45-5-1.The Board.of Appeals wiN'hear•all persons or their representatives,desiring to be heard-at each hearing,and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each'hearing. Each hearing will,not start earlier than,designated above. Files are available for.review on The Town's W.eblink%Laserficheunder Zoning Board of Appeals(ZBA)\Board Actions\Pending. Click Link:http-//24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Reowse.aspx?dbid=0. Contact our office at(631)765-1809,or by email:kimf@southoldtow:nny,govDated February18;2021ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,LESLIE KANES WEISMAN,'CHAIRPERSON BY:Kim 1.Fuentes54375:Main.Road.(Office Location), P.O.Box 1179,Southold,NY 11971-0959 377e8c50-e53d-42ee-95fb-6d18cb3aafee kimf@southoldtownny.gov SOUTHOLD TOWN BD OF APPLS 371 pt jai GM 1 l I AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Suffolk Times State of New York, County of,.Suffolk, The undersigned is the authorized designee of Andrew Olsen,the publisher of The Suffolk:Times,a Daily Newspaper published in Suffolk County,New York. I certify that the public notice,a,printed copy. of which is attached hereto,was'printed and published in this newspaper on the following'dates: . -. February'2S 2021 This newspaper has been designated by the County Clerk of Suffolk County,as a newspaper of record in this county,and as such,is eligible to publish such notices. Signature Eliot T.Putnam Printed Name _ Subscribed and sworn to before me, This da, of ' ' " C 20 14 Notary Signatu 6J1Y 'C: STATE Y" OF NEW YORKALBANY '. _.� 1`OTARl PUBLIC ^I OIRE63W44-1 mac; Notary Public Stamp 1SStp , hei��,�`�'` 377e8c50-e53d-42ee-95fb-6d18cb3aafee kimf@southoldtownny.gov SOUTHOLD TOWN BD OF APPLS 369 I BOARD MEMBERS �*o f so Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson yp53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 !O Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora #itc Office Location: Eric Dantes G Q Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. �c0 ^�� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento Comm Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, MARCH 4, 2021 PUBLIC HEARING Due to public health and safety concerns related to COVID-19, the Zoning Board of Appeals will not be meeting in-person. In accordance with the Governor's Executive Order 202.1, the MARCH 4, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting will be held via video conferencing, and a transcript will be provided at a later date. The public will have access to view, listen and make comment during the meeting as it is happening via Zoom. Details about how to tune in and make comments during the meeting are on the Town's website agenda for this meeting which may be viewed at http://www.southoldtownnv.gov/agendacenter. Additionally, there will be a link to the Webinar Zoom meeting at http://www.southoldtownnv.aov/calendar.aspx. If you do not have access to a computer or smartphone,there is an option to listen in via telephone. 10:10 A.M. - VINCENT BERTAULT #7467 - Request for Variances from Article III, Section 280-15; Article XXIII, Section 280-124; and the Building Inspector's October 22, Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling, and construct an in ground swimming pool; at 1) proposed additions located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet; 2) the accessory swimming pool is located in other than the code permitted rear yard; located at: 95 Navy Street, Orient, NY. SCTM No. 1000-26-1-12.2. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons or their representatives,desiring to be heard at each hearing,and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review on The Town's Weblink/Laserfiche under Zoning Board of Appeals(ZBA)\Board Actions\Pending. Click Link:http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0. If you have questions,please telephone our office at(631)765-1809,or by email:kimf@southoldtownny.gov Dated: February 18, 2020 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LESLIE KANES WEISMAN, CHAIRPERSON By: Kim E. Fuentes 54375 Main Road (Office Location) 53095 Main Road (Mailing/USPS) P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 u , Town Hall Annex, 54375 NYS Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 spa Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax(631)765-9064 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DATE: February 1, 2021 RE: INSTRUCTIONS FOR PUBLIC HEARING The following policies are required by New York State Law Dear Applicant; Due to public health and safety concerns related to COVID-19, the Zoning Board of Appeals will not be meeting in-person. In accordance with the Governor's Executive Order 202.1, the MARCH 4, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals Regular Meeting will be held via video conferencing (Zoom Webinar), and a transcript will be provided at a later date. The public will have an opportunity-to see and hear the meeting live, and make comments. No truction o tret�a� . _ .LG 1. Yellow sign to post on your property a minimum of seven ( ) days prior to your hearing, to be placed not more than 10 feet from the front property line (within your property) bordering the street. If you border more than one street or roadway, an extra sign is supplied for posting on both street frontages. Posting should be done no later than February 24, 2021. To avoid weather damage to your sign please affix it to a sturdy surface such as plywood. If your sign is damaged please call the office and we will provide you with another one. Prior to your public hearing, members of the Board of Appeals will each conduct a personal inspection of your property. If a Board member reports that there is no signage visibly on display as required by law, your scheduled hearing will be adjourned to a later date to ensure compliance with Chapter 55-1 (B) 1 of the Town Code. 2. SC Tax Map with property numbers. 3. Legal Notice of video conference meeting. Instructions for participation will follow, and will be posted on the Town's Website under the meeting date, and the Legal Notice section of Suffolk Times Newspaper. 4. Affidavits of Mailings and Posting to be completed by you, notarized, and returned to our office by February 25, 2021, verifying that you have properly mailed and posted. Please attach a photograph of the posting on your property with your affidavit of posting. 5. Instructions for Laserfiche/Weblink to view application. Instructions for ZBA Public Hearing— ` .f Page 2 Please send by a SBS_ e K `fie a tures ece _ the following documents to all owners of property (tax map with property numbers enclosed) vacant or improved, which abuts and any property which is across from any public or private street. We ask that you send your mailings promptly so that if any piece is undeliverable, you can reach out to your neighbors to request their mailing addresses, and re-mail. Mailing to be done by February 19,2021. a. Legal Notice informing interested parties of meeting being conducted via video conferencing. (Enclosed) A WEBLINK to the meeting will be provided on the Town's Website under the date of the meeting. b. Your Cover Letter which should include your contact information, date and time of hearing, procedures for submitting written comment via email or USPS to our office. Recipients should be able to contact you for additional information. Furthermore, if recipients need to contact the ZBA staff, they may telephone 631-765-1809 or email us at kimf@southoldtownngov or elizabeth.sakarellosnutown.southold.ny.us c. Instructions for Laserfiche/Weblink to view all pending applications. (Enclosed) Link to view pending applications: http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblinkBrowse.aspx?dbid=0. d. Survey or Site Plan depicting "as-built" and proposed improvements requiring ZBA relief. The Town's Laserfiche/Weblink files provides both location addresses and mailing addresses in their current Assessment Roll listing. (See Link Below). Also, the Town Assessor's Office can = be reached at 631-765-1937. Contact us via email or by phone if you need further assistance. TownOfSouthold>Assessors >Assessment Books/Tax Rolls > 2010-2019 >2019 http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/O/doc/I 022250/Paizel.aspx. e �a t .e .�' ,a"Iy�g • c- t eu gig= a;>� � � .1 NEW[L' Please note that without your mailing receipts, the ZBA will be prevented from conducting your hearing,pursuant to Chapter 55 of the Southold Town Code and New York State Law. Please be reminded that New York State Law requires the ZBA to follow the above specific policies. If for any reason, you are unable to prepare for your public hearing as instructed, please let us know. Kim E. Fuentes Board Assistant • I �,F•ry�O��pY�gN�.i102k,r�yT�a/a�.,�1"• "1...''ll 1✓ �11iP?.L DtY y -. J x• "*t";5• 4 .«'i.; t n F 6�1'£'°{ •i. NE4V.Y'OAK kCFAL MEDIA n�n �'� �� '.'t �2�+W3"`.A�d_kz'fi... -y •�,"��'A� y 5, —qqx�. $ �``T S4 'h. �`.. cocr.#cr � 'a.'C�,•• �: �� 5. �rt :�,, °�^�t`^,„s�'`t x,�t �• �� {�5� Q .'v�y� "s „y z ,_ti' ;t•��•vo� t iag :` T � ,Ax".^f. F� �y,,".yJ'.eY '3��p �; A, i` � i � y y'}'I ;,1y,}�g C M t ♦5{ .a"W,��[ f aa'a, 3 FSA Y'. If % . �r' M 1y f .` i b '* a5'�$ � i '�L°9 'M. '�'�'• 9'y T07,OP ; t I C,`t; '.,: t + g F 1C Y i ,r� AiS `l Y§ �`, �', a vx'; f t r•y ' �`Ail, Yt Sx .w, ti� i (r•ow;T" ,y c,+�y�� r.�. ' � •� � }} `t +'r � 1 +3� " t: �'�tye hs - � 'r ' ,��e �'•.a" b�.�"icy�is`. '"�-�^•','tfi��5�.�rt},:+' ,r `rrtt_i7 ��'x v,�a f:�, y k " �+��.f s• ..�¢:_. ?� - v t �tiA r� 4y�Yer4€"� .W ; �{ti:"sa� r ✓fi �" •�'�y' .ft.�p �4 `'� s��r} '`^f *i�..- ate«.`t** ,'"t z r,..o � +}Mk at J+' -� �t "b+ �� 1^ ,.., w,er �' ,�' �e�r, rs� � sa�-s• ��j'��r'L f y-1,�.+ a �tr`�5«�d.T�g'�♦ ,�.Fl��"f$S adP+� Y .,'��a Y �., ry��. \C 6i.€ �"y,� , S.fi� 4F_ k g � y � Ari fl Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 2 LaserfieheWebUnk Mywehv kI Hepi hUoafl sgni>n x .. .. Home Browse"' Search;. 7own9f9outhdd:ZonMg Baard of Appeals 2aAir; <. .. i Toning Board ofA eals { ?Hame� .'( "agecoiint emPYa na c Es II c t; (ZBA) Alphabetical index R`rs4Y PfoPE!tIES eoamncdore taserfkne Search Gutdes Path TorrcHIfSouttttalrhZonirig Boa i i 3 Meed n95chedules of Appeals[ZPJJ MiniteslAgendasliegal NoWeSWeanngs Creation date _�:� Vit]Pending 7110200112:1T;16Ptd ____ Reports Last modified i:.111 ...... . .. ._._._.._, ... .._._._...--... 52320171 M7'.14 AM s t i 7 Special EYw Permits ..• f• _ k ga Training Requirements ZeAofOWls 1 M2BAPo;KIeS _ .._ .... _...�.._... ..,.. — ..-.... i No meradata aWped ! Excepdnusr Code zao-loCP1 1 i F kn+luawkbon Listing 1 { U)ZBA Book of Mapped 1977 Fritting fait 189 ocelureaeRenihs ...! .. . _ . Bu@5chedules 5 Agmementa,Comnc>s&Leases a � � j . Paget off - _ • mm to EnMes:' i ' c .. .. ....:.t Above: Listed are types of records under ZBA Folder. ZBA Decisions can be found under Board Actions: Click on "Board Actions"folder to open. � � '.. +dh-•�...-'4;c u.X..;.Li N �s i.. - a. 4.x4 :Gr�Y'4"-.-?�.+^r1A�T-vi .25a_ i• aCs+T� 5+ :.Y.�4 e..A±ss-. s�'r"�'^..i?tQR 'F4�fiF- ' vis r 15at�Ct�e n,Ca�n�s� rldf$ tltd-�.lt�.o'� Sd'ui �=Cio1 s+ -e .ex>•�:.�:..35 .,,�. .a 'f�,..tts, it 1' �h..,. v��w':Syrs3'� .�._-0��'�v�u-.*'�rcias....�.' ..:3,s La58rftf:�e:�1f�bLlni� - Nome 13raWse earth iwrsOfsnflttcbldxbn7nsoiirtofwy��stZBA �Ba'aritarlPentt<, rr a � 4@- TRN r"h _ 2 A•n .:,. .s•"£ t'. sem{ a✓: �,,-i�a j"r"�`m"s""�'""i �790251tAAIN$OAUCCr�+'CdRD1NRLE � x Ef►tgl'PtO�ieifrSa � , - _ __-______-..._____.. .___-:. ._ _._. .__._.___..._.._--_.._..__.._ - ' Y- 3C&CiiFAt7y tndrahn r+vro e creation da#e. _ °;�`a�7370.7►eitd�000�12&66 _,..... ._�m._.._.. .._..._._..._._...,._._,_ _.. _ .-__.-.>.....:_,,.... `3'12872877,'f1.3fi07A{vf. I _.: ..; -.. Last trloditied' 47379-So#iidons _._ _.:_ 6/912026 :$B;Ptvf X7383 SpiAer 400Ar}9cS 8s - °�,` 73845E f�NFResorts MydonSiesorts.Campy�rotnid000f{035 ." '.:. _a.__.�;:. X7385 SE•Fried t04Q50-:i 13:1 t No:meta&ta.asst #738686QBayviewDrve-UC�1 --97 0a0 ,400 F i '�:a:7367F.ierdtolner•194041-4r1 A _ 2 ��#7387'12aidConier=SREPiAN=Arch pfan's.'3d0a61=A<t #r73WIfUr ton irrev Test 4000.128—420, VMS?Benlc lCO-:7f-1,d ! #7406'Nappa t000768 Pagel of'l Above, Lists all Pending Applications under Board Actions/Pending URL Address, Link is http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0 Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files '� I Page 3 � . Caserfiche Weti4mkHep,l Amor i ssnon_ 'Home Browse., search ,r �oirgQfSolAhptd .Zoning 8oari#�pfAppeals:(ZBA)>BoardAd(bds Board Actions ( t.NY.e vage2ount _rt a � ra ' Zryt� 79571979 G 1980.1999 .— 'i _ .... __...._.._. .......„ .__ ._ ...—___._.. .. _._........_..._.....—.._.._.._ _ .�i Path ED Town0l5atntiold1Zordng Beard �:..;! 20� of Appeals lZBN\Board Actions - ft]2001 Creation date ftl zaat 711=0011221$SPM __. �_... ._.._.___.. .. .._._ ..... 7 .-��2003 Last modified L. E2200a ftl 2005 i' 2006 No rnetadata assigned 2007 109 2008 6q 2009 } &ResBhs it 2010 .......... _...._..... _ M zon I 20ia t' ' Cz3 201-0 2017 .. -. ({Pendine - �. Above: Boo. d Actwns are-Listed by year.. Click folder to open.._.All Special;Exception " applications that require Coordinated SEQRA Analysis re stored in "Pending". Tome- 'Browse 32arq 'rain(115annP]6�71Ms0oardoiMp�sR�1 6oar�iACHare zov """'"""� � � � � � .. 2017N j p1w. " 5 5 c * 1 i9deee _ 3d7 dMlb6 ._.._...._. ....._ 'ram om.aum� ... rartlofr0;a11WmZorL�q BOord ;,1...... ®ion 7s B.aw.abn n Bd+re/�swas last snotltlktl . 67M10174]hSf NA j QAfa 116 Board AtY s -.-:-•r-^^^----^ '1 �7015 87 .... � BaudARroie ' C'Mttd'ddtd •. � - r.�.:v.�:i�.�:.._�...:� NO mtYa�L to�l}�est I t�'7al7 7o eoxd MOom . j_ 1 �.'91B % eoabnnaBs ... ]079 SB Boardl4bm '.:'I ®)OM SD BoaMAttlons ]022 73 BUrdMbm 7D23 333 BoaNKOom :023 118 .8oart'Actlas M'26 73 Bond M7fdts :021 811 —,d—s '�]029 63 Bwrd3mac ewrd Mlae Above: See listed File Numbers. Click on file you are searching. Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files � L� Page 4 , v Cashel 3 I _ t ; Above: In addition searching by file no.You can also use the above search tool by typing the name or title of the applicant. La§erfleheWeb�lnk �' "� .�' kcashel o I --Home Br'tiyr;e- search �cuaomue search Sort results by Relevance i Recard6 Management Search y . 7016 z .�1 Redd_ Board Actions-83 pages) choose field -. - Page count 83 Template name:Board Actions I �A � Page 3...:Colin and Kristen Cashel PROPERTY LOCATION:162 Lower Shingle H114 Hsher_ HIM, �� `� Page 4...19.2017 97016.Cashel SRM No.,000-9.1-26 minlmUs approval to remo-. Page 5...y 19,2017 97016,Cashel SCTM No.1000.9-1-26 GRANT,the variances as,. '{Seenh corns -. Page 9...COLIN&WUSTEN CASHEL SECTION 009 BLOC... Page 20-.Thomas Ahlgren(Cashel),PO Boz 342 Fishers Island.NY... _ Show more Intdrmatlon... +j 7018 Board Actions-56 page(s) . jlPage count 56 Template name:Board Actions - .Page 4&.,.930 A,M:COLIN CASHEL AND Variances under Article ld-sec"n ANN... ,.. Page 48...ance(s)KRISTEN CASHEL&7016-Request proposed trellis located In other ttu.„ . Show more information_, Above:Shows you files that can be found using a phrase, name or title.: Or you can search'by Tax:Map No. (District, Block and:Lot) using the format 1000-111:-1-1 LaserJictt0 WLbUnk - m __ Lfi1L I Nero I nbd9t� Home @roy+se.- Searfi TmmOtSovlhold>Z9Nn8Board W Appeals(ZBq)>Mlnutesf/igendasltcgal.,�1oUces/Hearlrlgs . •.Minutes/Agendas/Legal n r Namev.".. ___._.._.__..._. Page count "'1ts.Ynplatedi Notices/Hearings '�1957.1979 i A Qltt)I PrOpertles •: t ;l 7980-1999 ft3 2000-2009 - ._. _.�._ __....... _..... ._... Path t 2010 . . ... TownOPSouthold9oning Board .(..._... of Appeals fM 2011 _..------ :i (ZBAptdinotes/AgendazAegal ,e Notkes)"eadngs 1':i G....3* 2072 ------ { Creation date 1 X2013 t 7/70@001257:40 PM ... _.. .. _ ... ..._ _... ..._ :; 1 �2074 .,3 LdSC modified 2015 '211612016 215:14 PM I r-._. 1 i �i7 2016 X2017. } No metadata assigned Page t oft T 1 Enif .. Muncera`lomare PH�CNMd yrxYfiNr It'"94015 t—C3.U16 rvl Above:Also, Minutes,Agendas, and Hearing Transcripts can be viewed. Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 5 La'serflche Webllnk s ';MyWa1H Nr r`.Hedp i AbOOt�i _.H4trte Browse SearcFl;'.- TmimoP,.oatho�d>�omr�g 8oafdofAppeasf�>hfirnstess7l�ndasliegal NR4cC"�i' rsgs�•'7.Oi7 ,_.-___-.....�..� .,__a_:.�, x ,_ s •- :,_ ._ ::fin _, ..; i 2017 Name:. . - Pagecnunt - f�Jn�iLlten "n"x--="— ZBAA1ro5/2017 7 ZBA-01/05110WA9da 4. f Path i ! ZBh01105/2W7Hearing ..,40 �.. s Town0f50uthddvZDnhig 80ard i _. - ...:__.._. :....... . :. ..-. .. ......-..., .. ......... .. ........... ..`t Of Appeals r-.;I 7jBA01/O51M7LN .3 CFBAJ1MUr1tRR A&endaVL2gd1 +[�* ZBA-01R912017 2 ..-._ .... ... . :.( NoticeslHeartngst2017. .._. ,... _.....: .... .:....... ..... „....:._. - t A ZBA-01/79/2017Agenda 2 . Cmatton dace .. .. _..._ ,_.,. t 12MR0162:15:14PM (`�ZBA-02!02/2017 7 .-...._..._. Last modified i f {"�$ZBA-02(O1R617 Agerxla 4 _ .... e 6119/20i7453:59PM a ZW60210=017 Hearing ...... 45......._ Z11"WO212017 W. .3 _ .., - _ .. _ ... .......... (�ZBA-02/1WM7Agenda 3 Z8A-WId W75pecial 3 .edur4.&Rewtts� r . IEQ- ZBPr03704R0/7 _ ... .ry ,.. .m... ._ ._... SNhstt[!Xp?P!s�i�elri< .� t ZBA-03102/2Q17Agenda _:4 .. . 1 .: _ ..... ...: ... .. :. l ZBAM/02/2017 Headrtg 65 -', : 1 ZI I ZBA-0310 17LN 3 Y zBA03116rz017ngenda 3 _. .. ZBA-031WW75pedal 3 .. '.' ZBA-0410612017 5 j . FZBAOAIWRWll�enda q.... .. ... ZBA44t06/2017 Hearing. 45 . . Above. Agendas, Minutes and Transcripts are irrchronologcalorder. Revised 76/15/2020 1 +IiyTIr:. E GF HEARIdG The following application will be heard by the Southold Town Board of Appeals VIA ZOOM WEBINAR - REFER TO ZBA WEBSITE FOR AGENDA on http .m so-utholdtownny. viov NAME : BERTAULT , VINCENT #7467 SCTM # m0 1000-26- 1 - 12 . 2 VARIANCE : YARD SETBACK LOCATION REQUEST: ADDS & ALTS TO DWELLING , CONSTRUCTION OF SWIMMING POOL & ACC9Y POOL HOUSE/CABANA, INSTALLATION OF FENCE DATE : THURS . MARCH 4, 2021 10 : 10 AM You may review the file(s) on the town 's website under Town Records/Weblink : ZBA/ Board Actions/ Pending . ZBA Office telephone (631 ) 765-1 809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal,No. SOUTHOLD.;NEW YORK Appeal #7467- AFFIDAVIT OF In the Matter of the Application of: MAILINGS Vincent Bertault (Name of Applicant/Owner) 95 Navy Street, Orient, NY SCTM No. 1000- 26-1-12.2 (Address of Property) (Section, Block &Lot). COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW.YORK Owner, ( x ) Agent Wickham, Bressler & Geasa, P.C. by Britney Santos residing at Albo..D-Five, Laurel, New York New York being duly sworn, deposes and says that: . , On the .. 17 th day of February ,20 21, I personally mailed at the United States Post Office in Mattituck.. . _ ,New York, by CERTTFTEI) MAIL; RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy-of the attached Legal Notice in Prepaid envelopes addressed.to current property owners shown on the current.assessment roll Verified from the official records on file with the(X) Assessors, or ( ) County Real. Property Office, for every property which abuts and is across a.public or private street, or vehicular right-of-way of record, surrounding the applicant's property. (Signature). Sworn to before me this /14�day of , 20.1ZI,` Cheryl Simcrts NONy public,State of New Yb* No.31-4970341 Qualified in Suffolk CouMY 2 (No ary ublic) Commission Expires February4.20-,w;p PLEASE list on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. All original USPS receipts and mailing confirmations to be submitted to the ZBA Office along with this form completed, signed and notarized. Postal , . RTIFIal Service 41 . ■ CERTIFIED MAIL` RECEIPT 0 ��estic . I Domestic . nly �D �- m • . a C1 TI -- j „•p Certified Mail Fee � �p r "' m' 1 V0y t, ,••p Certified Mail Fee' 11J $ $1.6f1 't.. "°(1952 $ J.6tl Rm Receipt(hard pTI7'��`-2 ` Extra Services&Fees(checkbox e$flee ) 06 Extra Services&Fees(checkboxrbp ,addfee rdate) CI �{ ❑ etucoy $ _ to Y ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ 11 i Ifl t� ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ -�Ir'4"~ Orb a �. ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ r,-, o9tmatk [I Certified Mail Restricted Defnrery $ ,'-c 2 L HBf9 t ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ � �-'�'T j Here❑Adult Signature Required $ r3 ❑Adult Signature Required $—�T��-�r-��r ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ :l a s d []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ +rte.!rL• p�� Postage 't�Q� O Postage a- $ tll,7•- 1952 Er $ `$1_1.75 Total Postage and Fees ru l Total Postage and Fees �`t:5 >!17.��n21 n l 12/17/2021 $ g X7.21:1 $ �7.2�i �D Sent To - �D $ t a Thomas E, & Maria R, Reine:cke r'� l�b Nay St. Trust O Sheet andWi*No..;o PO Boz Ifo:--------------------- -•---------------- - O Siieei anilA-t: orS t. filo:-- ---------------------------------- 42 Lindeman Ave ; ' rte 79 Wp ��th St,, Apt, 10A C Stale 21P+4a----------------- - --�---^-----...---------- C State, P+46 loster, NJ 07624 tew ork, NY 10011 i ■ . Postal o o RECEIPT CERTIFIED i .. . ru117 .. E3 Fordelivery .- information,y f` ��a_W. r P l Certo lMail Fee �1t7• S. ,> Certified Mail Fee ..0 Certified ti $ $3.6i1 0952 ru $ $3.611 1952 'Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,eddree ert�te) �t i�(�!+ 06 Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,addtee p*date i 5 T ] 06 ❑Retum Receipt(hardcopy) $ I 1 I(I �\ `�A ❑Return Receipt(hardtop» $ y 0--- C3 a�}-i' •t.�^>•,,.C`r O ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ , Postn'Ia l=O ❑Return Receipt(etechonlc) $ POStIn + O ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $, F Hera k O ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ �-'' Here []Adult Signature Required $ $ 0 E]Adult Signature Required $ [:]Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ � ✓j ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ I-•' •�t O Postage0 p Postage Er $ $0.75 ;+� -0 �7` E• $ $0.75 ,'. ru Total Postage and Fees `Gt 7i /:,1� 1 Total Postage and Fees02}`A• 1.7tr2021 fu $ $7.20S° � ru $ $7.20 �� 1:0 Sent To 1:o Sent To r-1 Evan Lewis &_Zynn Lewis --Bro an_F ly_ Ix-rpvpcab�.c__Txust------------------ ------ O Sheet anal t N, Of3oxNo. --------- I O ShW&w pt leo,or PO BokFfo. r� 40 W. 2�+th St., Apt. 9E 2595_Village_Lane---lRear ---------- ------------------ --------- ---- - c/ry,scare,zrP+a�'---•'--------------- �ry0rent4 NY 11957 � PS Form 3800,A05 0-02000-904PS Form 3800,A0N 0019 • . Postal Service oRECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL` RECEIPT ,.ru CERTIFIED Domestic Mail Only Domestic a O r delivery information,visit our website at www.usps.comll. Run s J7ti u O I Ori n y y: 1,e . p Certified Mail Fee �)] Certified Mail Fee r ru $ $3.60 STI � �J ru $ $3.60 0 r� Extra Services&Fees'(checkbox,add fee Pff te) � NJI$ M1 Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add tee I i 7 52 ED ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ -,r-4 Q, ❑Retum Receipt(hardcopy) $ Il ate) 06 ❑ Return Receipt(electronic). $ 1 �ostmark 0 ❑Retum Receipt electronic ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ ere t6) ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ �'!'r o t?r_r-rm-�`. i' Post ark 0 ❑AdultSignature Required $ "'ti'••"-' i '1 ❑Adak Signature Requirod $ r■!r U—� ` /(`n Here []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$. l.1_�1f j 0 ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ it rte.rJrJ q �V! O Postage 1 �� O Postage Er $ $0.75 ��S;S�`�-.� ®�,,� $ X11,7� Total Postage and Fees ►_12117- 2 ru Total Postage and Fees n R I $ $7.20 $ $7.20 Se t To CO Sent To �s fi to �tonia 0. Gesell ra - --J.&W ce__-Rern tei.zi Sheet and ApE IVo.;a�PO Btlx 11(0: Street an No..or PO Box No. --------------- -7--River-6i.de---Dr------------- - - ------=- 20 Vincent Street Ct'�Slate,ZIP+4® Ci Sts"te Z%P+4e - RUmson, NJ 07760 f �riant, NY 11957 PS Form :11 April 2015 „ 100-90 1 U.S. Postal Servi( CERTIFIED , 0 ■ ■ N 'Domestic Mail Only ru Property Owners/Information r3 ' Ori nn � Y 1 5 L L USE Certified Mall Fee 26-1-4 f ti $ 3.60 s,�P'TT67, 952 Ellen J. McNeill r`- Extra Services&Fees(cheabox add lea nxate, �, �� ' ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy $a:.:_l,a 1rif 70 Vincent St., P.O. Box 314 C3 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ Postma Orient,NY 11957 C3 oAdults9 ature Restricted $ Here.Vy 'E]/Cdutt Signature Restricted Delivery$ 26-1-6 0$ osta9e $0.75 fUTotar Postage and Fees - �(r?=/• 7 f 2 +21 Lawrence Bernstein ti $ $7.20 20 Vincent Street cO Sent To r-q Ellen J. McNeilly-----------------_--------_ rient,NY 1195 7 C? Wiaiiii A f r- 70 Vincent St. , P.O. Box 314 ------------- ------ ----------------------------------------------------------- Crry,srare,�rP+d�-"" 26-1-11.1 Orient NY 11957 PS Form 3800,April 2015 PSN ,,, Sonia O. Gesell 7 Riverside Dr. Rumson,NJ 07760 26-1-12.1 Evan Lewis & Lynn Lewis 40 W. 24" St., Apt. 9E New York, NY 10010 26-1-21 Brogan Family Irrevocable Trust 2595 Village Lane 1Rear Orient,NY 11957 26-1-24 Thomas E. Reinecke & Maria R. Reinecke 42 Lindeman Ave Closter,NJ 07624 26-1-25 r :► SENDER: COMPLETE 220 Navy St. Trust th ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. signature 79 W. 12 St., Apt. 10A Z y 131gent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X New York,NY 10011 so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee r ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Rived by(Printed Name) C. Dat ofPelivery or on the front if space permits. I(M f C' 7 g7t /7 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ElVes Lawrence Bernstein If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No 20 VIncent Street Orient, NY 11957 ; t 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express@ II I IIIIII IIII III I III II III I II I II I III I I III II III ❑Adult Signature El Registered Restricted:Mail ❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery R istered Mail Restricted; C Certified Malis Delivery 9590 9402 6031 0069 3957 41 ❑Colleted n Deli Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for Merchandise 2. Article Numk er-,O-ransf r.from.secvice:rahPrt��T—..P-Collect on Delivery•Restricted Delivery ,❑Signature ConfirmationTm f }i 11 + ' } l!sureii Mai+ 11 i} I I: i ID Signature Confirmation 7 018 `'2 2 9 0 0 I10[J 2 617 14 0 41 isuied Mail Restricted DeIT<very i Restricted Delivery r—rover$500) PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt ; ETE THIS SECTION 3TION ON DELIVERY i ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. 7B�,M;eqeivu.rd ■ Print your name and address on the reverse ❑Agent —`so that we can return the card to you. 9W-let— 1:1 Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 17 ❑Yes 220 Navy S t. Trust If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No 79 W. 12th St., Apt. 10A ' New York, NY 10011 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MaiITM+ (IIII IIII III LIIIIII III I II II I II III III L I I ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted: Z Certified Mail@ Delivery ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for 9590 9402 6031 0069 3958 40 Merchandise I ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTM j 7 018 2290 0 0 0 0 7 2 6 7 3884 ured Mail ❑Signature Confirmation I ured Mail Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery i Ps,r'Form 3811 r llufyrx2615F PSN 1530-02'UOQ=9053 Domestic Return Receipt i- COMPLETE • ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signature ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ❑Agent so that we can return the card"to you. ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B• Re a (Printe Name C.Date of qellvery or on the front if space permits. r4 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 12 ❑Ye Thomas E. & Maria R. Reinecke If YES,enter delivery address below: E3 No j i 42 Lindeman Ave CLoster, NJ 0762.4 � I I ! 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Expresso II I IIIIII IIII III i IIIIII III I II I II I II II I IIIII III ❑Adult Signature 13 Registered MallTM ❑,,Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted! ! i9 Certified Mail( Delivery 9590 9402 6031 0069 3958 26 11 Certified Mail Restricted Delivery 13Return Receipt for ❑;Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article Number ransfer from service bell, ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation^+ i - —1—f- ! j x ! -f-—1 pu�0 Mail I I i I ❑ISignature Confirmation 7 018 2 2 0 0 0 0 0' `7 L3--?. ^414 0 1 1 >.r Mail Mad Restricted Deliveryl I I I I(Restricted Delivery Yer$500) PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt i -- r COMPLETE • COMPLETE ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signature ■ Print your name and address on the reverseX �/] 13 Agent so that we can return the card to you. `-l °rte ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. ce'ved (P rnte Na ) C. Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits. Article Addressed to: Is delive a dress different from item 1?D-Yes Evan Lewis & Lynn Lewis If YES,enter delivery address below: E3 No j 40 W. 24th St., Apt 9 E New York, NY 10010 I i I it 3. Service Type ElPriority Mail Express(I IIIIII IIII III I IIIIII III I II i II III IIII I I I III El Adult Signature ❑Registered MaiITM ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted Certified Mail( Delivery 9590 9402 6031 0069 3957 89 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receiptfor ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article Numbfe'r-flI -M!—isfier fio;m Sr.Lviceaml.axbe-l) f-i x. ❑Signature ConfrmationAl t )l.3on y j l —_ '0000' x I( I i ❑Signature Confirmation- 3i 1.8 ,2 2 9 0 0 0 0 0' 72 6 7 4 0 9 6 �ef$0 il.Restrlcted Delivery j Restricted Delivery• PS Form 0611,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt- r , EFTE THIS SECTION 'CTION ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. 7819nature■ Print your name and address on the reverse 6 Agentso that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, (Printed Name),, C. D le o Delivery I or on the front if space permits. C;( 1. Article Addressed to:, D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ es If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No j Lawrence Bernstein 20 Vincent Street Orient, NY 11.957 1 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Expre"s@ II I IIIIII IIII I'I I IIIIII III I I I Il I III II II III III ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MalIT11 R ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery Registered Mail Re El ACertiried Mail@ Delivery ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for i 9590 9402 6031 0069 3957 58 ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise ; ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation"+ i `2,_Article_Number_Cfr2nsferfrcm service label) Insured Mail ❑signature Confirmation 7018- 2 2 9,0 0 0 0:0 :7 2 6 7 4:05.8 Insured Mail Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery J(over$500) PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530 02=000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt : t SENDER: ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signature ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X E3 Agent 4 so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee ; ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpieBe, B. ecelved by(Printed Name) C.I Date of Delivery ` or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes r Ellen J. McNeilly If YES,enter deliv41address below: ❑No 70 Vincent St. , P.O. Box 314 'c`;, Orient, NY 11957 ' I 3. ServiciType---^''� ,o°° 13Priority Mail Expre§s@ II I Illill 1111111)111111111l11l 11 l 111 l l 11 l 111 ❑Adult Slgnacure j ❑Registered MaiITM ❑Adult Signatuie'Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted [&Certified Mail@ Delivery l ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for 9590 9402 6031 0069 3957 10 ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise I 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted.Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTM , t i, , , , r , ❑Insured Mail +❑Signature Confirmation 1 70 1 A 2 2 9 b 1070 bO r 17��►7 4 3 1 ❑Insured Mail Restricted I?elive�y,� � I Restricted Delivery I (over$500) PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02=000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt v 1 ` LAW OFFICES WICKHAM;BRESSLER& GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD,P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565 ebressler@wbglawyers.com March 1, 2021 Kim E. Fuentes, Board Assistant Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Re: Appeal No. 7468SE Property owned by Vincent Bertault 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 Dear Ms. Fuentes: In connection with the public hearing scheduled for the above referenced application on March 4, 2021, enclosed please find additional "green card" confirmation receipts. Very truly yours, Eric ressler EJB/cs Encl. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF In the Matter of the Application of: POSTING APPEAL #7467 Vincent Bertault SCTM No. 1000- 26-1-12.2 (Name of Applicants) (Section, Block& Lot) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK I, Vincent Bertault residing at . . 95 Navy Street,_ . Orient, New_ York ,New York, being.,duly sworn, depose and.say. that: I am the(x) :pwner or (. ) Agent for owner of the subject property On the _ 24th day.of February , 20 2� l personally placed the Town's Off Bial Poster ori subject property located at: 95 Navy. Street, Orient', 'New York indicating the date of Bearing and nature of application noted:thereoh; securely upon subject property; located ten(10)feet or,closer from the street'or right-of-Way (driveway entrance):facing the street or facing each:street or right-of-way entrance,* and-that will remain I hereby confirm that the PosterimitrRw&wd in place for seven (7) days prior to.the date of the subject hearing.date, which he.arig dat as shown to be March. 4,. 2021 (Ovine Agent Signat e) Sworn to before me this Day of 7 / Gr.� ' , 2( , Cheryl Si ons Notary Pubiic,State Of New York No. 31-4970341 Qualified In Suffolk County (Notary P ic) Commission Expires February 4,20.g'? * near the entrance or driveway entrance of property, as the area most visible to passerby ------------------ —;-- SECTION . r ■ 100010fete Iterrisa`,'2,and 3. A. sign tur ■ Print�.your name and address on the reverse X — 13 Agent so tha`t'we can return the card to you. ❑Addressie f C d N t i P d by ive —(Printed , e Attach this card to the back of the.mailpiece, Beceatof Deli � on the front if space permits. F 1. Article Addressed to D. Is delivery address different from item 1? e Sonia 0. Gesell If YES,enter delivery address below: ON f i 7 RiversIM—Mr. , Rumson, NJ *07760 i 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express@ I II I IIII'I IIII II I III II III I I II I III I (I I(III ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered Mail ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted WCertified Mail® Delivery ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for 9590 9402 6031 0069 3957 72 ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article Number(Transfer from sery Ce_1a6e11 Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery p Signature ConffrmationTM isured Mail ❑'Signature Confirmation 7;_®1;8 2 2 9 40 q0 2.6 7 4 7 2. µ .sured Mail Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery ver$500) 'PS Form 3811,July 2615 PSN`7530=02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt " --- �, 157 u _ t �wtY+wM��rvti aw STM ry• �r I� u4 d 1 v z ra x It • 3ZZ ..F;..., yy :gib- +X.esyf. at J � t � �,{yM�ggriY �T �t�". { {��i•.y�`hy}f+ � 4 , fI WICKHAM, BRESSLER& GEASA, P.c. P.O.BOX 1424, 13015 MAIN ROAD MATTITUCK,NEW YORK 11 9S2 U.S. POSTAGE PAID FCM MATTI LETTER EFB17 A 1 701,8 2290 0000 7267 4126 , 191000 11957 �' O E�US,��s\ R2305E123348-06 U� FRN 1 N //,/ PC SAND Brogan Family Irrevocable Trust // //1',/.//RN CO�RW kNOGy 2/222 j `orient,lNYg11957e 1Rear 111,4// s S57:S 14-9 i OO" r�l1�1,11,1-/111111.1111111�I1111,1„111113111.111IIIlis1111111111 t 625ee202-f7f8-4bec-928a-6c7c87Of7ae4 kimf@southoldtownny.gov AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Suffnik dries- LEGAL-NOTICESOUTHOLD TOWN.ZONI;NG BOARD OFAPP,EAIA�f��1R5bAY��1��V��3;�Q21 at 10:00 AM:PIIBIIC. HE'ARINGSThis PUBLIC HEARING will be held.,virtually via the"Zoom online:platform. PursuarAto.Executive Order 202 fi of Nevo York Governor.Andrew.Cuomo in=person:access by the public Will not be Perm ltted.The:;public will. have;access.to yiew;listen and make romrnent during the mee#Ing as't is happen:ng via Zoom VVebinar. I?etails about how totune in and make comments duringth:e meeting are on'the.Tpwn's:website.age.nda forthis meeting which t mqy be viewed.:at http://www.southoldtownny.gov/,agendacehter. Additionally,.there will be a :link to the Zoom Webinar meeting_at littp//www southoldtownny gov/calendar aspx. 10:00 A,M.-HEATHER MNZA , 5fl0 Request for a Variance from .Article 111,Section 280 15,and the Building Inspector's March 19,: 2021 Notice of Disapproval based on<an application for a permit toreconstructa deck addition to an existing single famlly dwehing;at;-1)resulting in an.exist ing:accessorygarage.located in.other than the code permitted rearyard,located at°2200 Yenriecott.Drive,Southold,NY $CTM No.1000 55-4$2 tics 10 A M WILLIAM R. AHM,UTY ANDJOELLEN AHM.UV, 49 Request for Uarlances from Article XXIII,Section.280-124,and fhe Building Inspector's March:5,:2021 N:otieeof D.isapproval:based on an.application for a permit to.construct'a deck.addition to a s'r►gle family dwellir g;at 1):1ocated less than fhe cade.required minirrrum side yard setback of •10 feet;2).10catedaess than the code required mmlmu'm combined side yard.t f:25:feet,3)more th;an:fhe code permitted.maximum iot:coverage of 20,Y�';located at::3405.ayShore•Road,Greenport,NY:5UrM No :1000 53-6 1010 20 A.M.-PETROS AND'PENNYTSEKOURAS 7499 Request fora Variance from Article:ill,Section 280-15: and the.Buildng_Inspector's March 15,:2021 Notice o. Disapproval ti'ased.on a'n application for a permit to construct an;aceessory n ground swimmmg.pool;:at 1)located in otherthanahecodepermitted rear=yard; located ati 1852.North Bayview Road,(.Adj;t:o:Goose Creek)Squthold,'NY S:CTM No.1000-70=12 39,4:10:30 A M F i WEATHERVANE ENTERPRISE,LLC049j6�-,IllequestlorVariances1r6m Article Ill,Section 280 14:,,and the BuiTdiiigInsp..ector`s March'7,2021 Noticispproval)3ased dn:an app ication:folr a permit for a lot line change;,at ):Lot!measunnga:ess"th$rrrinimum code:required lot size,of 120000sq,ft.;2).Lot 2 measuring.less than the minimum code required lot size df'120,0011 sq.ft;;3)Lot 1 measuring less-than the code required: minimum lot width of2010et;located at Off East End Roads Fishers Island,NY SCTIVI No>;10:00-2- ;8a and 3000 2 1 $21Q`40 A.M. CLAUDIA DING RAi,ON 7497 Re, Variances from Article XXIIIK Section.280- 124,.and:the Briilding;inspector's.Febroary24 `202�ofbisap.proval based ori an app lication,for apermit. to.construct:additidns and alteratloiis to an..existih ,sirs a farrilly dwehing;at 1)located less than the:zade required rear yard setback of$5 feet,2)more`than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%,located at 130'Viilage Lane,Orient,NY.'.5CTIVI'No 1000 18 5.6:10 50 A,M. CECiLIA OTT AND:ENDRE MESZaROS 510` Requestfor Variancesfrom Article III;:Section.280-15;and the.BuIIding.Insp:ector's Apri16,20.121.Notice of bis"a;pproval based.on'an application fo.r 0.Perm to legalize ari as built.Shed:and an as+built hottuti;at;.1)shed is located.in other than the code permitted rearyard,_2)hot tub is located in other than'the code permitted rear yard, located at:1225 Arrowhead Lane.,Pecor ic,NY.SUM No.1000-98 3 8.1100 A.iti. DAVID ROHDE .750 Request for a Variance from Article 111,Section 280-15;and the;Building inspector's February 22, 2021 Notice of. D'isapproual based on an application for a permit to in;stall an.accessory generator .at;:1)located in otherthan fhe.code permitted rear yard;located at 1615 Anchor Lane,.(Adj,to:Shelter island Sound)Southold, NY.SMNo.1000 79-4-6.1.1:00 P.M.. PETER TORKELSEN��Request for.a Variance from Article.XXlll,Section280- 124;and the-Build r)g Inspector's March.25,-2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to legalize an "as-built"deck addition to an existing single family dwelling;at 1):located less than the code required rearyard setback of 35 feet;located at:800 merLane,Southold,NY.SCTM No. 1000-78-9-18..1:10 P.M.— JONATHAN BAB:KOW AND MAIA RUBIN& equest fora Variance from Article X"XIII,Section 280-105;and the;Building inspector's April 15,2021 Notice'of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to:construct.an eight:(8):feet fence:surrounding a tennis court ip thefront yard,at;1) more than the code required maximum four(4)feet:in height when located in thefront yard;located at:360.Private Road:#8,(Adj.to Dam'Pond,)l East. SOUTHOLD TOWN BD OF APPLS 364 625.ee202=f7f8-4bcc-528a-6c7c870f7ae4 kirnf@southoldtownny.:gov AFFIDAVIT OF PUBUCATION The Suffolk Times Marion,NY.S-CTM No:.1Q00 2:3-1-18.A,120 P.:M —MARCEL AND SHELLEY DZANIA 51 Request for Variances from Articie IIL,.�Section 280 35,•and.ihe Bui)dlrig)pspettor's April 19;2021 Notice.of:Disapproval based on an .appiicaiion�for a permitto:constru.ct anaccessory,'in-ground:swimming pool?and to.legalize an existing accessory greenfiouse;,.at;1}poo .is located in-other thari:the(code°permitted:rear ya rd:2)greenhouse:is located 14 other than the cotle permttto'd rear.yard,located at 1620.Koke Drive(AdJ.to�am Pond}'Southoltl;<NY SCTM Na. 100'04M-193.1:30-04M,-VINCENT BERTAUL.: Adj.qurned from.April 1,2021}RequestforVanan'ees from Article:Ill,"Section"280=15!Article XXIII,`Section 280-124;:and fhe.Building.Insppttor's October 22,Notice of Dtsa.pproval E ased;on a- --lication fora pe'ritiit to:consiruct additions and alterations to an:,existmg,singte fiamily:dwelling,and cohstru'ct an`in gro.tirid'swlmminggool;at 1}proposed addttionsJocated less:tha.n the code° required minimum-front yard setback:of35:feet;2)the accrysw.mmng poois lcatedn otethr 'the,sa code permitted'rearyard;located at::95 Navy;Btreet,,Orient,'NY.S.CTM:No.1000-26-1-12.2.1:40 P..M'. VINCENT BERTAULT 4685 (Adjourned from April:1.,.2021)Appikant'requests a Special Exception urider:Articie:Ill, settivn 28. (13). The ApplicanVis owner:of subject property requesting;a:uthoriiationao establish an ,AccessoryApartmentroan existing accessorystrutture,at :95:Navy Street;.Orient,.NY.SCTM#i1000-20 1- .12 2,T.he Board of.Appeals will hear ali;p&s-ons or their representatives,desiring to be.heard at each hearing, and/or'desiri[ig':tb.*subinit written statements:beforo:the conclusloh—of each hearing: Eacfi'hearing.will notstart earlier:than:designated`:above:..Eiles;:are gva lable for-review on The'Town's:WebUnk/L.aserfiche under.Zoning: Board of Appeals(ZBA)`Board Actions\Fending:. Click Link: http f/24 38 28.228:2'040/weblink/Browse aspx?dbid '0 Gobtacf our office`at(631)765 1809,or by einaii: . kimf@southo(d#oWnnygovDafed2021ZONING BOARb OF APPEAL$,,LESLIE JCANE$WE1511/1ANy CHAIRPVR56NBM Kim E.Fu"sS4375 Main Road(Office Lo.ration,) P:.O..Box:1179,5outholtl;;NY 11:971A959 SOUTHOLD-TOWN BD.OF APPLS '365 625ee2O2.;f7f8.!4bcc-928a-6c7c.870f7ae4 kimf,@.southoldtownny-.gov AFFI.EYAVIT QF PUBLICATIQ'N, The Suffolk Times state-cif Nlew-ybrk., County of Suffolk, Tile,undersigned is the authorized designee.of.Andrew.Olsen,the publisher of The Suffolk Times;a WeeW Newspaper pu.Wished.in SuffolkCounty, c - w-hich"Is New York. I cer V that the public notjc,e,:a printed, opy-of attached jh"Ooto:was,printed and p ub1Is.ei h idlmthl'sbiewspoper on.the.following dateis, 'c May 2.7,1021 Thi§`n6wsOa0ee'has biabri desigNtedbyth.e County Clerk County,as a-nowsp aperloxecQrd othis. cp4nty,.a"d,,cissuch,is,,P,lI Ibl' top4li,11shsqc. h.notices' S Jgnaturi0, rn F0 IEU4 C7 7c! -C—:7 IEIIq,t"r,.'PtAna'rn gp� PnntedName JUN 2.E 2021 SObstrib:edand.iswo.rn-to;before:,me, IN s.b4 day-0.10 n6.2021- otarySignatu '' -Jill%141.1fl!?Pf" %401%1 i%%. STATE OF NEW YO NOTARIPUBLIC: AtAW.Y OIRE6*443 Notary Public Stamp 0 SOUTHOLD TOWN BD OF APPLS 363 i f BOARD MEMBERS rjF SOU Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �� T/y� 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 �� l0 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. • COQ 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento liyCOU Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809 •Fax(631)765-9064 LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, JUNE 3, 2021 PUBLIC HEARING Due to public health and safety concerns related to COVID-19, the Zoning Board of Appeals will not be meeting in-person. In accordance with the Governor's Executive Order 202.1, the June 3, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting will be held via video conferencing, and a transcript will be provided at a later date. The public will have access to view, listen and make comment during the meeting as it is happening via Zoom. Details about how to tune in and make comments during the meeting are on the Town's website agenda for this meeting which may be viewed at http://www.southoldtownnv.aoy/agendacenter. Additionally, there will be a link to the Webinar Zoom meeting at http://www.southoldtownnv.gov/calendar.aspx. If you do not have access to a computer or smartphone, there is an option to listen in via telephone. 1:30 P.M. - VINCENT BERTAULT #7467 — (Adjourned from April 1, 2021) Request for Variances from Article III, Section 280-15; Article XXIII, Section 280-124; and the Building Inspector's October 22, 2020 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling, and construct an in ground swimming pool; at 1) proposed additions located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet; 2) the accessory swimming pool is located in other than the code permitted rear yard; located at: 95 Navy Street, Orient, NY. SCTM No. 1000-26-1-12.2. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons or their representatives,desiring to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review on The Town's Weblink/Laserfiche under Zoning Board of Appeals(ZBA)\Board Actions\Pending. Click Link:http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0. If you have questions,please telephone our office at(631)765-1809,or by email:kimf@southoldtownny.gov Dated: May 20, 2021 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LESLIE KANES WEISMAN, CHAIRPERSON By: Kim E. Fuentes 54375 Main Road (Office Location) 53095 Main Road (Mailing/USPS) P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Town Hall Annex, 54375 NYS Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 y Southold, New York 11971-0959 `r Fax(631) 765-9064 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DATE: May 3, 2021 RE: INSTRUCTIONS FOR PUBLIC HEARING The following policies are required by New York State Law Dear Applicant; Due to public health and safety concerns related to COVID-19, the Zoning Board of Appeals will not be meeting in-person. In accordance with the Governor's Executive Order 202.1, the June 3, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals Regular Meeting will be held via video conferencing (Zoom Webinar), and a transcript will be provided at a later date. The public will have an opportunity to see and hear the meeting live, and make comments. Belo p1 ae se ee nstzu ns tifo�7tl��es video c fe en ceAheax ng;and�materia� r"equi�ed 5to°p p red 2, F s a '..h` .u x [for.the�Z�BApublic heanng.�Which includes fPLEASEREAD CAREFULLY�- �w,r .......c,.r,��._......__:':',..�°i...a..f...._u ..;tea ._c.,._.._.c.,..r�;.u...�...�..,:—z.......<_...t.-...�..,..,......�.u._. s'�u..:r.....:..ta 1. Yellow sign to post on your property a minimum of seven (7) days prior to your hearing, to be placed not more than 10 feet from the front property line (within your property) bordering the street. If you border more than one street or roadway, an extra sign is supplied for posting on both street frontages. Posting should be done no later than May 26, 2021. To avoid weather damage to your sign please affix it to a sturdy surface such as Plywood. If your sign is damaged please call the office and we will provide you with another one. Prior to your public hearing, members of the Board of Appeals will each conduct a personal inspection of your property. If a Board member reports that there is no signage visibly on display as required by law, your scheduled hearing will be adjourned to a later date to ensure compliance with Chapter 55-1 (B) 1 of the Town Code. 2. SC Tax Map with property numbers. 3. Legal Notice of video conference meeting. Instructions for participation will follow, and will be posted on the Town's Website under the meeting date, and the Legal Notice section of Suffolk Times Newspaper. 4. Affidavits of Mailings and Posting to be completed by you, notarized, and returned to our office by May 27, 2021, verifying that you have properly mailed and posted. Please attach a photograph of the posting on your property with your affidavit of posting. 5. Instructions for Laserfiche/Weblink to view application. Instructions for ZBA Pu Hearing Page 2 ....... --— ; Please send by USPS`Certified Mail, Return Receipt'the following documents to all owners of property (tax map with property numbers enclosed) vacant or improved, which abuts and any property which is across from any public or private street. We ask that you send your mailings promptly so that if any piece is undeliverable, you can reach out to your neighbors to request their mailing addresses, and re-mail. Mailing to be done by May 17, 2021. a. Legal Notice informing interested parties of meeting being conducted via video conferencing. (Enclosed) A WEBLINK to the meeting will be provided on the Town's Website under the date of the meeting. b. Your Cover Letter which should include your contact information, date and time of hearing, procedures for submitting written comment via email or USPS to our office. Recipients should be able to contact you for additional information. Furthermore, if recipients need to contact the ZBA staff, they may telephone 631-765-1809 or email us at kimf@southoldtoA=�.gov or elizabeth.sakarellos@town.southold.ny.us c. Instructions for Laserfiche/Weblink to view all pending applications. (Enclosed) Link to view pending applications: http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0. d. Survey or Site Plan depicting"as-built" and proposed improvements requiring ZBA relief. The Town's Laserfiche/Weblink files provides both location addresses and mailing addresses in their current Assessment Roll listing. (See Link Below). Also, the Town Assessor's Office can be reached at 631-765-1937. Contact us via email or by phone if you need further assistance. TownOfSouthold>Assessors>Assessment Books/Tax Rolls>2010-2019>2019 http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/O/doc/1022250/Pa eg l.aspx. IMPOR=TANTSTRUGTIONS: N�r'` ilt Scan= and emaal the `USPS ,mailing .receipts, ;green- signature sands,` and r , laffidavit to kimf(aisouthoIdtO�vnny goy;sand PT S` MAIL** F S. thf.lZ� A"1 P::; Od.r,B� xtheORIGINASt0 twf oo 1179; Southold,NY; .:....amu,........._i...................:�`!! .......... _.:::.... ..._.i:. .._.:.... ...............:_..v_.:..._... ».�' ......e.�L. �..._�.-_. .__.........uh. ....a.....:.j.....ls.. ru........ Please note that without your mailing receipts, the ZBA will be prevented from conducting your hearing,pursuant to Chapter 55 of the Southold Town Code and New York State Law. Please be reminded that New York State Law requires the ZBA to follow the above specific policies. If for any reason, you are unable to prepare for your public hearing as instructed, please let us know. Kim E. Fuentes Board Assistant c��d't�+a � �.,t � •t O W� ;J b+rs iY�•.;yr rJTi+'y ka' R 4 M ;4 c •-�+ Y F c. r o2r 7,�`r rt '� ftss�r.tE�y rt �� g,�,_ k�F fi+lr�jr}•,F � T+( ..M��S S VF•6./� �� 4 't �,�, 5•W r � ��t N"�. .. ra�.7 F��x i to f s g t• �„T•t"' N E 11 -Y O R b t��,,�„'�• r:S G.��i''r�.."Yt n, - ;., a : �SOC(AI � c•� S �� 2 .ttr '+`'! � ��<7''t•S'' Y 1Yt �nt� ti� i� 7S t' 7 s .� �f�.uE {fix:.{-.�Y.•s y.r .;.;rr �`�,,r . t1EDC1 s __i� i F'`.?•`+^'"r �'`., 't,t x t F�!�� { )ti + � \ � F s. t' e• z' � • r� �<. c�+,l r K'�i,.1*�J.�"� '�Y,^.•t�'�' � -�+ry'�91t,`>fi..,`��>,70��,..�T'� t'�'+.4�g2pS�Aa 3,,��;, r � Tw '4'�`4�.: C.O`CCAL7 �,�` � � r< �,--�;�t� �,h? � �'3"a,�,�y �'.�.,na!� �ay.��tl;�`s"r^•,t7{,`'* �� ' a�-t�' � S us M�. •5"4e, ;��,,-z • �1 t c�'��•.n�v;• s :.. ,< �r3�.s�.,,,� ..�-n_�,, �.sr� �r + � � '� `��, . �. s .y Fn � S!� sd .+a�� }".'s'�+�•t'� +^ t3tr" Ew t .0 ,'mak t+"�. �+ , x_r;�y��' 6�'�`�`� x:t �,�- "fSd�+ r{� s'�'= �, p yr3�`,`+•z xw �'�;.+, r - 3+" l N'4,`F.rEG"� YS1� � t 1� civ � �.+1�•,'d-{" q .� A�� r' eta; U�'ke ,✓,• ? 1>r..t> g+I ,) �': r 7t�fit.o. t..t... To= •.! s r . "� g'$S.,d. ,�"' a 4§`};'+, y x xg� 4. s`-F Y g c"'�v;s,f:..). 5 4#•x'°p z a. a 43� y 51w'-+'e�~�+.std{d a``°`¢a2°�. n"'}9t `zr(t' '3Ft1ry' z ,e .r.,iF fi�,i S Inai A•.s�y�. �Kx+sw rt,'F`a r'k�+r�� FTty, �,s3 `,4 . i h'+k �• 'Y Y +r s ..a t §at• ..�^y y 's b� g xp� K ;�FiS f KS FrtT } t1Y; �� p ah c7a 1Fe _ iC rpt 5t Y;1S= t S. k-t � a 1 1 �� r {•`r' 4 't � S Yt v sss r < Z•< - '� .•� � 'It'x5+'}�" r„ s - a s� � e r.!a � ,4 y F s,K'� �". r i "dam _`;�ts,`7J�y F S Ztt x s3 �Y��+ 7;�l�j�p¢ �J`AE�k�y�p�rpt -�• n s. �,t� "7• c•Mj. z ,w' � r ak�7,..x '7, 4,x t ++AA IT f}3 g�y,�{{ 2 .c f`a a ar + 3' k'a '+.ark,•'}' v t Tj ) ,''t1 .r ;A. ,1 ., >{- S •z ! r int„ YF1la+ s .; sr �. + Y � v rC 7�r za^ r F r"�' +�� s• *, t ti r t� r .y yr,��zst-T ?'�tr.{a ��•� � ti��4� Yrr ..t+�t3�,4ii SC��xt fi'b� `i � �1r'+� :cet 3lll� +a\ t ..r i ✓,e,:: 'K t .f r� r• x•3••tR h a y J�K" trr'4 J� +• f w ;`,,.'rte •^'6� riro�} lU�i 3. a t� 4" ,w�•.[t, �3'°S• r � � r' b y.�r 7"W'� d yy F 1 , p�', *Frh,. t .r'• r�+ .r .E{ ys�'h`s v i� ti ` +., �'�r E f �x .��fr^7•cr �,. ,�5,,, L}� `�r �+.F, r ' or F ` �'K•! 1 F !4 s Y `" .�.!t•' h �! ,n F4. J fi'Sh 4 zt+'--kr�'. d f,. r 4 '�U� t f nca v"'. t}'c�`.,r� '�• frrF zti N: � r a�;} � tf3 r. '� �!�r-� `1° �""/e��t$'}+ r, v •` "•cFyt�"• `t',,F`t'w""ss^s ® +F r `�s q�tj�gy, cr '+ ^yr9' ' T��S'µ'Y`�`i,;1 p}�� S k,F v4✓ f C ei�y +.,•'.h'�iiL� ' .�rl- dY. +IF1 g Y airy +l 9 Lvw . uAW, x.'� '� �e 1 ,� X k44'l,'�' f` �. Fes".. � w a,{F}:.ysr, r3'• iN r `n-ry r. tom' ��+�� e'�' �E. .�r'•N`�-•��,t � Yl�.�F� � '� �w "A�° ��SSrw�..y,?jdyi'%�� 5t�,y v�.,�'L6 �r`�; ,��,�u'� ,�::r 3 ��.:. �.'�n. aQ�#'tT ",�«`�,,.,k�>� ��1�• .5 ��'S�' :ati.2'h' ��x''�,��,.'�. ".ty��:�;�,'T.a �c��':�r.}�r��' ,.��cx;3�d'"`«�.k�. r _ \ Laserfiche Instructions ZBAFiles Page �� Page 2 1 serf!thetNe4unk r»z ® arywe6llnl a Fldp�.n�dtJ sib 1 1 +tome Browse� ieard,�- TawnOPSauthdtlazonlnBBdardti(Appel}Ct13Af 1 �� ,. -t- Zoning Board of Appeals :%.r (ZBA) Alphebe0cai Index U. ..... _...- .. .. . 1. ..... ' Lese&ne S--h Guides - Path :-o .. ._ ...._. ._. .._..... . ..__. .... __-... .. ___..._._._..... ........_..__ - ... _.. __..._...__ .._ .._—.__._.__. .;' Gd-Meedn;sd:edules. :... .` TownOf5artlio!dtZoning 0oa .. _. .... _....__..:._..'..:..._,._....._._.... ....__..'.___..�_.:..._..._—._..___._.__..._...,_._...._..:_......_._.___`___..__�........_._..:........ � "' dAppeWsgBA1 ',{'; M41u0es/Ayendas/Lepl NatleesMeaimgs .. ._ Qeatfon daze ' - 7r101200112:17:16PMtbrb-^ '---'---'----'-----'---- --•—'--'-- 1 Last modiled t:, Pd Heporls..�.........:..........- ...... ,..�.__..._._..... _ ..._.__�._,........._._.,..._.— j &173 1711:07:14 AM I --.- _ - fM Tradgg RegAk GntsZOAOf KI* _ r�"-s..i..r. •'' ZnA Pordes ' ;� NO iIICtEd8182551&,Qd. � `I�Elctepttoris Lkt Coda?81Y70CP) 1 � � __,—,^� ........ ...... .._.. _...,.,_..__..._...._ __..._... - ,.: t ®zaA soot of capped 1977 ExLSBng tats 189 a� Yj�,�'. .". �,.� Bi10(sehedUlK S A Corroacts8 t6DSK ' Above: Listed are types of records under':ZBA Folder. ZBA Dedisiphs can be.found under. - Board Actions: -Click on "Board.Actions"folder-to-open, . .. 41 . et�o�tle 8r+ le' setrh F o1r�►%PfS1tMs1r� 11[�fft * qtr t� ; r' �+� f ' ,c+_d'=, :.:, ... -• � _�, ..:a ...::_..5 �� s�r 1 t �i. 5 �"" Sh;.T' _..r',.,.,_ l ,r.�,c,a .3y.ti4,... [ � _ �Sc pLs�i� ,,,trzz,,�µtir�1�� y �� }Y3b25iLt$►��Fl�C�G* � ... ... . -�4Y+•�L1.1•, a"Q�"S3�T��E"1f�&µ`t�� - ._,-.._.....-_-_-,.____-.._.._,.._._._ ....�.._--'---'-'--""_._. 5 fxY ". mAGwC;t�EC�GLJNS3�{itJt7S. Creation date I ' 77�tnd 10848 ' N.,x .Eastmofliled 7�79Sa1y_dores a�itOg1 I 6/92O2O: 5a`13:ptlpc�Z3S�OAiAerODaSA.S&3 ---- --- --- �" , -. ^—""] 1 '�`�938A§� H1�1Fxesotts,f�do�Res,uts' Carnpgfo�nd r1.'4bPi4Q-.'-5 •No metadabassigned` I •' Dr .0-OMW:=sin>i' :; j '�:Yk�t37}�iu1 Csuhtx 19i1O-�t-4�i :E f -V Ftard(:orner SREPWJ=Arch Plar, 1OOO 6t d t: :, - 6 - J3$8-`Nfinton Irrev rtssEiD0�=126..2-2M �'k7389 Bei[C 1000"27..4 ' � •� - II t'��79O6NaPpatOOP-8&115 Above, Lists all Pending Applications under Board Actions/Pending URL Address, Link is http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0 Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 3 1� 1 UserBche.WebUnk • lyyk lm�i Heal'ybovcy s? k Home Bro>v9e 'search - -7ownOfSout�lold�.2orutRg soardo[PPf�a15 fZPA.l�BoaMActtonf 'Name:.-. .. Dab?count Board Actions ::. Par n I .... ..... ... 1} � r Ys 100.999 Path- otAEofti`IN15 -M 2001fa —'_'--.._.-:.-------------------------'-----_ ---- ., - `' ' ppealg m2002 -- -- --- U Creation date -�Zom 7/1wAOi-1221i55 PM,. ;:. .---- `-- ------_.—..---------'--- _-------' ----------------------........-'-- .Last modified. - '� 2004. — ---- -- .-----,— -------- --.� ! 312aW171134-07AM C 5 -------'--------- --— -- - . � �zoos If 4 NO metadab assWmd t'L C3 2009--- — - -'- ---- - ---- ---�— 2010 ------------ .:: n 2012.- _--___-.---._— .. 2013 -.Ca2014. III 2015 2,016. ..' .. ' _—.- - - - - .. 2017. Atiovee Beard Actions.are'.list ed by year ':Click folder to open: All Special Extep#ion applications:that require Coordmaied SEQRA..Analys,is'are stared irr''`Pend'ng" 7,7 - . - 2017 3a> ...... —d— .... Mh ravrg6dnhdATmhlgOmN (.� �----"--•--- ------ -----...--' -- � - --------- . n Alp(ah(M40wd ®)ool loo ... m.rd,auwv- . ...___.... . ....__. ... �. 7009 � ea mwhaw treetlm date. ®von. .. ... s_.. .... ....: ... .'ee,.i.abn_. _....... ........._.... ..... IFJA1741Y.17 AA1 --• _. _ - - _ .. ._ lasllmdlfke it>oa> n BavdKean> . 4'7L20174N651 AY A]9u lla maKMloiq ��•�"ti v.'u+:+�' Ate 93 m+mAmme _....._..... ... ..._. .. .... /b...a.,•+.Xq'gl ! TOl> )0 ........... 1::.. .. .. .. . . ... .. .. —d- -d ue>n . 1.i. mare>.Iws I. A:�x> >oz, m eoad>som ' 1969 a mardnmorn .. . Above: See listed File Numbers. Click on file you are searching. Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 4 k I Cashr� q j �.r e r'..-:` ._., •.... ....;_: .. ., _s. ¢:_. 71 as e 3Rr 1*st .1Zf d, k Above: In addition searching by file no.You can also use the.above search tool by typing the name or title of the applicant.. . Las"er}II:tTpWebl-Ink ��.:I�E � o c ' - � t�ottie errty�= search. � {�, Y 1.CuAomlze search 'Son resuhs hy,.Releleance Y ' ..:�1jecOrd6 Mane9alne991 Seard9 .: 71— � � � - .. � �.'.I ®7016' ne d--* •Board Actions-83 0") tl9oo9a•Rem' _- '.1] Page mount 83 Template name:Board Actions-. - .,�50.'f;'M° .I Page 3..„Cplln and Maw Cachet PROPERTY LOCATION:162 Lo11er5hlnile HIR,Rsher- � ivi•�"".• I Page a_,19.2017 0701&Cashel SCTM No.10009.1-26 mh hTim approval to rem0.: Page 5_.y 19,2017 A7016,Cash'el SCTM'Na f 000-¢1-26 6RWr hevarlaaes as_ , Page 9.»COON&MUFS N CA%IEL 5E6I01,i009 BLOC; - 1 Page 20.Thomas AhlgrerKCaahel)•PO Box 392 Rihws Blard.NY-. .. . .7v show more lnformatkn_ _ 7(118 Boatti ANons-56 pages) Page Codnt 56 template name.-board Adiorls .. r ...Pap.49 930 AM.{OLWCASH4AND VarLiMes;9vnderArtldeldSecOon ANtL�., .. - •. :Page 4a._an[e(S)t0a5'fEN CASNELS7016:Negoest pr Pp*- Oehis loaded 1.dthertha:. .. .. _ . . a .L'Show more Inf rrnaUor�. - Above:Shows you files that can be'found using a.phrase, name cit title. Oryou.can search by Tax.Map No. (District, Block.arid Lot) using the format 1000-111 .1-1. .... LaserlLcheWsbU k 2 777 dome erowie, search townms-0.thoid.-ZaIdoSBoardvPAppealf(ZBA):MN{9[e5/A$ehdaYlEgdltogte57yFarNr155 a :1 Minutes/Agendas/Legal I 1'1a1e +— �1�P'6ecot-It. i Notices/Hearings i 1957-1979 t. 1960-1999 ..... ....... ....... ..........._.... ___ ._ ........ .__.. Ca Pam +. Ea20002009. ..... ._. ..... ....... i .. . . . .. .. .. .. _ TovmOl50utheWZaning t)oaN 1:.i M32010 •.i otAppeals :;.,! �.j 2011 y QBA)1A•tinVli'zAgorxlavLega1 -...i 202 . ... 'tbLKes7tYeadrgs - Creation date - Ezl 2013 .. •• 7narzmt 257;40 PM • Last n,od111ed z61s --•'---- - --'----- ----'--.. ...� 12/162016215:,4PM _.--- i i 20,6 - 1-7 2014 �EN 2017. --- -- i No metadata migned j.: Page I of 7 ,71'EnD . oea.�.xmaNr pvuyu.u.de W«e.>,:w.9w.u)Oif}elrnl laLaffis.w ttn.�n.a 4 L9r 1 1 Above:Also, Minutes,Agendas, and Hearing Transcripts can be viewed. L Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 5 Horne Btavts6' Search,� 7awr+QfSogthpjd>��n,8�oardvfAPP�fI�9a'1�5tmTesl�v/�ue�tFSoi>�fiean�BS'��b1i t F _ -4 r�-'�i ho- ,; 4 zo�y t Hame Page mynr � — * 4. E. Path. ._. �.ZBhptlOSR077 Hear4ig _.—.,: 46 TbuslOBoirthotdlZotting Board ...- ..._. ..... .. 'g ZBhOUD52077 W _,3 . '.I (�BaNMatlmeslAgetda"sne�,t1-01/1A2017 2., { N0ti0eslHeattn�i{2017. - :....L..... .......... ._._ ._ .. . r Ereatico.date: t .._ - 1717620162.15:14PM .. }� '0 ZBA02/0?I1017 7 _ LaR modllled �ZBM192l07R0f7hgeida --�- -- 4 --'_-- '---�_-- 6tt9W745359PM za+ovl . .. � Q _ 6ROt7Agenda 3� _..� No metadata OW91ed Z i t. .:_ .._....... _ ... —..... _,...._._. ..,_ (j H4-0YtW20775Pedaf . . ....,. . .... . _____. ..3 . t QjZBA-03M2Y2017 7 .... lb ZBn-03ro?M 7Agenda. ,i ZBl4lt3/OZ/ZDt7HeaA0g .65 . ZBM03f0Y20t7 W [�26J409+16mf7Agenda ZB11-03[16/1017 Spedal ,9 7. _ _... ( GSza�a..... 7naenda Y _ _....,.__.4. .. Zea•pal081201THead�..0 ,45.... .. Above Agend'a's, M notes and Transcripts are-inc rono d ica rder Revised 6/15/2020 . i I4U, T1 (.oE uF .HE ARli4o 7 "he following application will be heard by the Southold Town i, Board of Appeals VIA ZOOM WEBINAR - REFER TO ZBA ` WEBSITE FOR AGENDA on httpmm southoldtownny. niov NAME : BERTAULT , VINCENT #7467 SCTM # m0 1 000-26- 1 - 1 2 . 2 IARIANCE : YARD SETBACK LOCATION REQUEST: ADDS 8 ALTS TO DWELLING , CONSTRUCTION OF SWIMMING POOL & ACC'Y POOL HOUSEICABANA, INSTALLATION OF FENCE SATE : THURS . JUNE 3 , 2021 1 : 30 PM You may review the file(s) on the town 's website under Town R,ecords/Weblink: ZBAI Board Actions/ Pending . BA Office telephone (631 ) 765-1809 t -7%-7 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Arl+&U t_f ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF In the Matter of the Application of: MAILINGS &,,-/W/&, //.,,-1,1/4 5 V-� /(Name of Applicant/Owner) SCTM No. 1000- '(Address of Property) (Section, Block &Lot) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK I, Owner, Agent li5�7 I ( ) ( � residing at , ss /// New York, being duly sworn, deposes and says that: t_ On the day of , 20.)-), I personally mailed at the United States Post Office in New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in Prepaid envelopes addressed to current property owners shown on the current.assessment roll Verified from the official records on file with the ( ) Assessors, or ( ) County Real Property Office, for every property which abuts and is across a public or private street, or vehicular right-of-way of record, surrounding the applicant's property. Signature Sworn to before e this 41 l 11Z,�414 67,eyrle//� (p day of d , 20A . AMY M BEASLEY NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK otary 'ublic) I Qualified in Suffolk County Reg.No.01 BE5039767 PLEASE list on the back of this Affidavit or Co is io Ex ire Fera 2 20 to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. All original USPS receipts and mailing confirmations to be submitted to the ZBA Office along with this form completed, signed and notarized. -- 7 Postal - U.S. P. st'al Service'" "CERTIFIED MAILP RECEIPT CERTIFIEEY o . �- Domonly estic Mail o;. ! CO I r_1 Dorn' ' O Corti led Mail Fe Cc f Ce FiU +$3°bpi _p rtlfred Mail Fee or $ f7q�2 J fL $ .bO f fg52 ExtraServlces&Fees(checkbox,add fee r � Ext Services&Fees(checkbox,eddies r-1 ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ 1 ate) 1 _7 •r ) tcl. fI \\ ,.�'' ❑Retum Receipt(hardcopy)- C3 O ❑Cetumd Mail t(electronic) $ d;t_ 't _ �P' postmark O ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $-- i Po rka 0 ❑Cartifled MaII.Rastdctad Delivery $_ _ f� I•F rf rl -�-. ❑Certified Mad]Restricted DeliveryKI 7�0 Adult Signature Required g g� re •'[t r +-+gr .4 Ire p ..,--, ❑Adult Signature Required $ �b, 0 ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delive $ °`-� f, ` Gtr2 y "'�xGl7—R>•ra-�,J Postage Delivery '�— �r-6 C'� ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ +'=•°ti+.+� 1 �— .�o $ $0.75 ° 3 Postage Er c oC� $tel Postage and$7s 20 f_I i? ru Total Postage and Fees'�0 rU S tTo $ 7°� van & Lynn Lewis co - - -------- ---------------- SSonia 0. G - o -" ' esell Str a tpt 7yo or Pa"ox tic: __ r Riverside r s id ff, -- ----------------------------------------------------- �r` �U W. /+th t. A o SireeiandApt"tic.:orPoeoxAfo. ---------------------------- --------W. --- --Pt. 9E ___ �` _ e Dr: ew York, NY 1001p - ------ -- ------- �'; iaie;ziP+d� - - ---------- ------------ 0sl6n, NJ 07760 .+ .+.... INam - 1 Postal o , o , U.S. Postal Servic' e�' •• Only - o RECEIPT Er - Er Domestic a nly M Or , Y i, m7C.Jtified `' ••,p Certified Mail Fee f7J (. I {?�� . $ '$3.60 ti';,�-- �gCy� rp e I + II Ocheckboiyad, - teX1%• rij $ $ ee$s3(ch°e6ck0❑RetumReceipt(hardco ^2`TJf ❑Reum Receipt(electronic) $ � Nbox eddfeeO Return Receipt(hardcopy) C3 Cetflfied Mail Restricted Delivery �ysmark O $_ 7f . '' P C3 []Adult Signature Required $ - -- '�j r0 I(� 0 ❑��m Receipt(electronic). $ _ ,-_a Fey �{•�t! — ti �' 11Certifled Mall Restricted Delivery $ ark ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ —err-- `�. '1 —H�e�O Q Postage e - °- r y } O ❑Adult Signature Required $ $='•t"-' �-+ ` t�1 Er ��: k T ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ $0.75 �y L7 Postage �i a- ru Total Postage and Fees 115 [121 Er $ $0.75vt $ $7.20 ru rl l Total Postage and Feesi l ,2Z/2[r2i rcoq 11TPen J. McNeilly m $ Ir 10 $7.2O 0 Street andApt 11ro.:or P�Boz No: --------------------------------------=- ---------- � �'awrence Bernstein 314 0 Sti-etand-AW No::orPaeox"No: =--- ciy`srere Vincent Street -- ------------------------ -- ------------------------ Orie NY 11957 -------------- -------- ' cgs sr�re,z;P+a® -------------------------------------=- r ent NY 11957 `.. -Form 3800j April .15 PSN 7530-02-000 PS Postal Service'" TM � Ln CERTIFIED MAILP RECEIPT , U.S. Postal omestic Mail on CO ly CERTIFIED MAILP RECEIPT 7 . Domestic Mail Only _ • A L CO 07 a Certified Mail Fee _ C1 _ '�l�6 C1 � , f A Er $ C ` 0952 r- Certified Mail Fee Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee r ri7 $3.60 E� f' 2 r_1 ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ I��.le) `1 eP °� O ❑Return Receipt(electronic Extra Services&Fees(check box,edd fee T11;lrorufWal \ $ $f� nr, MAY12021 1 t" 3 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery. Postmark 2®2r ,-� ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ '' �1!1 Here d ti [] ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ l i I it i d Postmark ❑AduitSignature Required . O ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ MAY, 2 tl 0 ❑Adair Signature Restricted Delivery$ •lif l - yy Postage ~ esti` b O El Adult Signature Required $ c� 5 4 g e+ Iyy $0.75--t '��'as 5�� Q []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ O Total Postage,and Fe�s f)5/12/21a�1 .. 17 Postage iO°75 O $ 20 , — . p� r Total Postage and Fees Stree�a 6Apt. NNo $ 7.2O.. rU Sent ------------ --y St'. Trust. E p• $r PO Boic tVo:" ---- RJ Sent To 79- W. .12th St. A t l0A ---`-""- �___ aie:ziP+d®'- Thomas E. & Maria_Rt__Reinecke_____________________ ----�-____ __ I Street andApf.7i ,or P(3 Boz No- ----- 42 Lindeman Ave --- New York NY 10011 ------------------ - • c( ware;ziP+d�- -- - " "" - loster NJ 07624 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD � 7 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LtSOUTHOLD, NEW YORK �6vkauu AFFIDAVIT OF In the Matter of the Application of. POSTING —/,4e4s //-z SCTM No. 1000- (Name of Applicants) (Section, Block &Lot) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK residing at New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: I am the ( Owner or ( ) Agent for owner of the subject property On the �� day of , 20A I personally placed the Town's Official Poster on subject property located at: J indicating the date of hearing and nature of application noted thereon, securely upon subject property, located ten (10) feet or closer from the street or right-of-Way (driveway entrance) facing the street or facing each street or right-of-way entrance,* and that; I hereby confirm that the Poster has remained in place for seven (7) days prior to the date of the subject heari g date, which heari g to was shown to be (Owner/Agent Signa re) Sworn to before me this Day of Cheryl Simons Notary Public,State of New York No.31-4970341 ®u®Iifled in Suffolk County (Notary Public) t?onanisalon Expires February 4,20 * near the entrance or driveway entrance of property, as the area most visible to passerby • . � M CERTIFIED MAIL" RECEIPT t.t7 Domestic Only co C3 Ori . ��Y '1 S rU CE) Certified Mail Fee Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add lee s'� /ql t 7 r'j [3 Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ 1f�L�e� O 0 Retum Receipt(electronic) $ �'-•. �� PaYlt O ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ `a•K 12 d []Adult Signature Required C3 []Adult Signature RestIcted Delivery$ Postage,., �h C3 Total Postage and Fees �I l�if j• /x(12 j d .$ ' $7.20 rll s t-r orogan Family Irrevocable Trust_ Street andA t No.,or F Box No. - -------- 2595 ------= 2595Tillage Lane State,Z%Pt4a ------ rient, NY 11957 SENDER: COMPLETE ON COMPLETE TH IS SECTION ON DELIVERy ■ Complete items 1',2,and 3. A. Si r ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X �� I so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addr see j ■ Attach this card-to the~back of the mailpiece, B. eceived by rioted Name}' C. Dat of D ive or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to; D. Is delivery address different from item I. es I Sonia 0. Gesell If YES,enter delivery address below: E3 No 17 Riverside De, i Rumsori, NJ 07760 f R � 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express@ II I IIII�I Illi I'I I II'lll III I II I II I I IN I I lil III O Adult Signature El Registered Mail ❑Adult Signature RestrictedR Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted 13 Certifid MailO Delivery i ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery !f Return Receipt for 9590 9402 6031 OQ69 3962 36 11Coilecton�Delivery Merchandise 2. Article Number(Transfer_froin.service.labell 11 Collect on,Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTM 1 1 _ sif, ❑Signature Confirmation I 7 0�,8 i `�2�J 0 I CI[�:0 0:17i 2 i 7{ +p 1`R 1- ►1{hl Reis{rlcted belivery{{ I Rgstdcted Delivery i 'PS iForrrt 3811,IJuly 015 P',SN 7530 U2 000-9053 i Domestic Return Receipt y' SENDER: COMPLETE COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIvERy ■ Complete items.t.:2 and 3. ■ Print your name and;address on the reverse l so that we can return the°car'd to you. gent ■ Attach this card to the back of the maiipiece, 0 ddressee ; or on the front if space permits. eceived by(Printed Name) C. Date f Delivery 1. ArtlCle Addressed to; - Ellen J. McNeill era, �D•FIs'delivery address different from item I? E3 es Y i Y' If YES,enter delivery address below: o f P 0 J ox 314 `�' j Orient;, NY 11957 e '•�'. j i _ 3. Service Type ❑7�A4dult Signature ❑Priority.Mail Express® III IIIIII I'll IIIIIIIIII llll'lll 111111111111111 Certified Mailp Restrictd Delivery ❑,Register d Mail Restricted" 9590 9402 6031 0069 3958 71 'D Certified Mail Restricted Delivery Delivery j ❑Collect on Delivery ry I�Return Receipt for —2._Article_Number_[Transferfromservice_1abelt 11 Collect on Delivery Restricted DeliMail very ❑Signature conf(rmationTM 7018 22 90 0000 7267 3976 eMerchandise d/Mail Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation ' PSfForm�3g-jljj(Iy 2U95 RSN 75311-02-A00 9053 I; l'$sao) Domestic Return Receipt t - I i � r NOTE OF HEARING NOTIC 7 ...�✓..rw. -r.�r.rr E�O_'___��HrE..�RING . �y Yy r.r✓y..� • t�� t w.tw�ew�.vy iooN w[rruN-urTq To i.q {� Mtun.w�ntw .T%685E BERTAULT VWCENT AoV. WNEr.on Aaryo...hlt outholJtSQwnn.p yLyNr BERTAULT,VINCENTY o 07467 :ij#`��"r�.FL'�� I u'iPCCIgL E%CEPTIOK %[R�CeiYARO SETHACK6LOCgT10N Y i�r>;s•-'S �� ozF„^ '.A��°" N�rrw,,, oueeT uosawLT.rD m+%tuNa. �� l}: r•w i. bii EDF%D y ' sTy`4 �,�_ }� � 0.°t • �� : ��Y. 0.Y �. ) �; _ �` ,�,• !."'!,F/ .i" �'S'� r, 1:- .,,,�, I�. 6t L SENDER: •MPLE] IS SECTION COMPLETE • DELIVERY VL/ ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. signature ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X /- 61 Agent + so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee 0 Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. ceived by(Printed Na e) C. D e of elivery or on the front if space permits., . ) c-17 1 �iv. � 1. Article Addressed to.-' D. is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No Lawrence Bernstein 20 Vincent Street Orient, NY 11957 1 1I 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express@ t II I IIIIII IIII IIIIII II IIIIII II I I III III I I I III ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered Mall TM11Adult Signature Restricted Delivery 13 Registered Mail Restricted Certified Mal(@ Delivery I ❑Certified Mail Restricted•Delivery 19 Return Receipt for 9590 9402 6031 0069 3962 50 El Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Conf(rmationTM "'--�Mail ❑Signature Confirmation + r0-U0 2 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 6 7 3 9 9 0' ,. soman Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery i PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt i -- COMPLETE •N COMPLETE THIS SECTIONON DELIVERY ' M Complete items 1,2,and 3: A Signature } ■ Print your name and address on the reverseX ® �°� 13Agent so that we can return the card to you. J ❑Addressee i ■ Attach this card to the back.of the mailpiece, B. cy(Pr to , e) C. D to of Delivery or on the front if space permits. 1 1. Article Addressed to: D.1s delivery ad cess different from item 1?' ❑Ye l i If YES enter delivery address below y❑No 220 Navy 'St. Trust"' 79 W, 12th St: Apt 10 , '" I New York, NY 10011 3. Service Type, ❑Priority Mail Express@ II I IIIIII IIII IIII II I II I I I I II LILII I III I III III l]Adult Signaturedg;R4gNWPKj9"lTM ❑ i I Adult Signature Restrioted Del(very [3R Istered Mail Restricted i v 13 Certified Mail Restricted Delivery o signature confirmation- 9590 9402 6227 0265 8486 57 ❑Collect on Delivery - ❑Signature Confirmation n—A.+r,;e,n;umher_fTransferfrpm service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery --� ❑.Insured Mail celRt 7020 0640 0001 9870 4815 ' WRestricted Delivery COMPLETEIN COMPLETE THIS SECTIONON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A signatu ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X 13 Agent so that we can return the card to you. ❑Ad ressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiecr;, Rec' ed b Name) C. D i e of �fv or on the front if space permits. l 1. Article Addressed to D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ as If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No i ; _ Thomas E. & Maria R. Reinecke 42 Lindeman Ave Closter, NJ 07624 i 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express@ i II I III II IIII II I IIIIII IIIIII II I I.I IIII I I I O Adult Signature ❑Registered Mail O Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑ Restricted' Mail Restricted TKCertified Mail@ Delivery i ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery Return Receipt for f 9590 9402 6031 0069 3961 75 O Collect on Delivery Merchandise l ❑Collepton.Delivery Re tact d.De iVe O Signature ConfirmationTM 2. Article�jurt1ber(Transfer rom servile laljel) ;_ ; s" S e I nature Confirmation i I f t; r r( 1 ( 1 1 1 4't019 7 0 2[] 09-40 D(]b 1` 9'8 7 0 46`7; Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 ;17amestic.Refurn.Aeceipt. Mir- MA L'-' '?•'r-F",as�.r�+5 t\ \ �. 'y� t ✓"7r"�.'/i + l� + •_,.t o \"j`Y f' ajtY, ;:S � t..+'"�q1�� .'tic '�• �• '�• I � 1 r °i':1l r oe r, rr r�'r�z of! v J +M {' srfttkr-I r4ai + {,' "� n � :°w• F►+. ti s n�/fiy i,}J rK7t !:{t G' �i 4lQwfr ; le �4:.. f i ..I 4•`f d. � r .1\ .. } t��L,. .�p1�ay 7'i+i"°�t'y�4r°�1: £`'Ir r •.�-�ytt�j�.r+' -r ../f,� # '.j ix 'r :•'e"iW, ,gymq,xgt�'Y 'Tiy°a•b ✓�4''''{ ' '� Fj„ `P t<°" �'' C� __ C. :' t i, f ' .: � �•�i� •�t�'�i�+�,Hgra�ii,J��" �"�„"i ff,.r �rY ,. L� _ a ,T7 ° q �i��,J'i+�,vfji •� hx< f.� � ria r a F y. ,�J ? t' a f'•y %�� ''�.�� J �'r /f'''.+f�3' �Y A�J f5 Ny { qt eS ly3t \ ,�.! �]; '4`ro'� ...".'ry4"-fr✓^ r �� i * �.4 Y {�::�• \ .f tib'+.` �"+{ Its -SIEN�ER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3 A. Signature ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X /�., ❑ 'n t' so that we can return the card to you. v Addressee 111111 Attach this card to the'back of the mailpiece, B ived by(Printed Name} ]Molvery11or on the front if space permits. O y 1. Article Addressed to; D.ladelivery address different from item 1? 0 es j Brogan 'Family Irrevocable Trus If YES,enter delivery address below: [3 No ( 2595 Village Lane Orient, NY 11957 I r 3. Service Type. OPriority Mail Express@ II I�IIIII IIII III I IIIIII III I II I II I I I III' II I III 13 Adult Signature ❑'Registered MallAdult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑ ❑ W R Registered Mail Restricted ISTCertified Mel 0 i Delivery El Certified Mall Restricted Delivery •W Return Receipt for 9590 9402 6031 0069 3961 99 ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise Tn, ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation 2. A,,1 1,,,M,mhar_fRansfer_from-service-label) ---.__ l ❑Signature Confirmation \ ?020 0640 0001 9 8 7 0 4853 _ Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery PAFJudy 20115 P$N 7536 02 000 90531:•I Domestic Return Receipt y IsT Iticopn toll It?" 31!lfe83-eb6$-4a34-8Ce4:-Ibf982857,,e9f I�D kimf@southoldtownny.gov AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The,Su#91k Tlmes- LEGAL.NOTICE sOUTH.OLbTOWN'Z,'ON.' .ING BOODDIPAPPt LS', : THURSDAY;OCTOBER 1,021 at10-.Oo AM. PUBLIC:HEARINGS NOTICE ISH'IEREgY GIVEN-, pursuant to Section 267 of the'Town,La*w and Town.Code Chapter 290 ' To-wri.d.Sauthol ithi�fotl6,Wiog,"INPER$'ON"pu hjit-�Ihearkng.wt[I.be held by"the SOUTHOLO TOW ZONING: 0F 40 Ab - . ;0 'h I t bid, Nett fork 11971-0959.,on P LS'.0tt H T_ 1he:p.0public n A phave . _coront-d,oring,-the.robli hearing, is. - - happ6ninga,Z6 0MwMINAR0001 8,about hQ . t o, , une:iniand'make-com06ntsdurg the public oetin bev!OA ad: t i `Vo*6svo,slt agenda i ' 'hi ,heorin on the. for"this:M gw I w g',are, e hmay �v �a bttP:/./..soatQ_dQ' W0 ageotentar, Additionally;there bearh k Apthe ZQom Ve -at *m ie fn e I. http./ 10:00 AM iOHN, PIR ',56 '60 f-�' a'Vartarcvfnd.n .Arfiq 6-111 -Section 280-15, Ing tan'%. DI'poproval based on.cab�--appllca0o.n ora,permvtacdnstrut 7 the '(tt.Ocl�.ro�rv ocate. at; ';il .. , q- .1 code , . .1 � 1. 1 ,accessary 1. other per 8 0i 1: d !340'Genwvo. .- ry ca.rport; in' Roady butchogup ' ,.1.00071-aci�*6,-;5, NY�ScTM No 1010 A.MGEORGE NT UtTZIS47537--.Requrionces,from Article Ill.-Section �—W,15- j�,st. .for Article IV,Section 2804%,A( icI0 XXIIIJ.Sectkonl 280-124 a-ndthe 8uldingInspector's:May7,2021 N. 0tice Of Disapproval based on an.application q: or an as p�licaV perm q:for*.a pe bail amendment to Verrilit#424552 to .Make. .additions and Alferafions ioon exisfilng.sin fa -'ngat� gle: . milydwelli: j- 1Y-"as bullt"accessory structure is located in,otber than the ccdepermitted rear yard 2).single,family dWelling,lo.pted less than the code.required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet;located at 870 86y. sh ore Road., Greenport, NY.SCTMNo. 1000- 53,4- 10:20AM,-JOHN A[ID,JO.YCE.HOZA.PFEL#.75-42-Request for Variances from ArticleXX.111,Section.2,80- 124:and the Building,Insp'ectpr's May 5 21 v -i 20. - .Notlice.ofDisappro a]-based on an application for a permit :construct additions and alterations Aoan.e ng stngle family dwelling;:at;-1)located less than the code *ti require. m-Injimarn side yard setback.of 10 feet; 2)located less than the:code recipi redam minim. combined side yard setback of 25 fopt;.located at,1490 Village:One,Orient, NY.SCTM.No. 1000-24-2-14, 10:30 A.M.-MARC AND SHARI.,WEISSBACH#7540SE-Applicants request a Special Exception under Article 111,Section 2804313(13). The Applicants are owners of subject property requesting authorization to SOUTHOLD TOWN BD OF APPLS 2 311.1fe83-eb6-5-484-80e4-1bf98285765f ki.m. f@zuthol.dt.ownnyA ov AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION: The Suffolk Times establish:an ActessoryApartment in:an existing accessory structure;at:35G Paddock Way., Mattituck, ,NY, SCTM#1000-107-42.12. 10:40"A.M,-DOUGLAS BRADFORD:475.44-Req,uest.fo.r Variances from. Article XXIII Section 280-124 and the Build,i4g1rispectors Wy 18-,.202:1 Nbtice;of Disapproval based onaivapplicabiGn.fora perm it to, construct a new porch:and second'floor additionsand alterations to a single family dwelling;at; 1.) located; less than the code required:minimum side yard setbackd-10-feet on two side yards;.I)locitedless than the code l:required quire minimum combined side yard setback of 25 feet;31,'more than the code,permitted maximum: lot.coverage`of20( 6 3�yshore.Road Shelter Island 50u rd/Peconic Bay.),, G'reenpprt,,. NY SCTM-No.1000-53-64E. ., -50.A.M.-ANTHONYAN. DANGELAIGERAC1545-Req,uestfor a ViKO 4de froitt Article:XXI_l,,Section. *- .8Q-X24and:the Building In pec rs;May'S,2021Notice of Di sapproVA based.'o0an,4 p lic4t on'for.a: permit. to construct-.an.qcq ssory n.-,gTound swimming pool with:a raised patio,�.Ot 1)more.th.a: than-the code, permitted W. loc�ifed at:6.00 Shu Harbor Road, 1*1 Pond:l.h Green maximum lot.cov*erage'of 2 (Adj,.to u (it), reen it:- SCTM:No 0-35 35.-.-: ILOQMARKALIERICT4754-7, Rtquest for a variance Ar't it 61XIII,Section 280424 and the 'Build ng Inspe#p i's,June 24,2021*N ti. :. f Dis. pp rri`lti o to 6 6 rovb1basedon,anappicallo 'k�,!c permit construct an accessory ln�ground swimming 0.06.1 with-masonry.coping Mid.ra-lsed:pat1os-*at--1)-ffibre than-the code: permitted:maximum lot coverage of 203 ,,located at.115.East Side Avenue,(Adj,to Mattituck Creek) Mattituck, NY..SCTM No. 1000-919m;3-19. 1:00:P.M.,-MANNING FAMILY IRREVOWLE TRUST#7549 Reou6stfor 8 Wirfa'hce from ArdtleXXIII, Section,2.80-s,-124'andffie 1301 ldibgInspector's I .6f.bt Disapproval n. n or's May 14,26h Notice A application fora permit to legalize on 4as.bufftl'cdnverslo.hof a.scfeehed in,porch to:a he4ted,Wnr0oin attached;to .a single family dwetHing;,,at,1)16catedllots'-thah the code.required tear yard setback bf150:,f6et,, located at: 1330 Donna"Driv&, Mattituck,NY.SCT M_ No. 1000-1154545. 1:10 P.M.-MARY HOELTZEL.#'755.0=Request for a Variance from Article.XXIII,Section 280-124,and,the. Building.lnspiect&s June 16, 2'021'Notice.b.f Disapproval based on,an'appli'Cation fora perm h to demolish and cons.Wictan:existirig single family dwelling;at; 1) located less.than the code.required:rn!n*lm*urn side: yardsetback of 15'fe-et,1) located less than the code required rearyard setback of 5.0'feet-:located at: 6190 Great Peconic Bay 51vd, (Adj:to Great Pec.onic gay) Laurel, NY.SCTM No. 1000-1287!2-5. -110 P'M.-VINCENT B,ERTAULTjja . (Adjourned from June 11,2021) Request for Variances from Article III, Section 280-15;Aaitle:XXfll,Section 290424;and the 134ilding Intpedor's October 12,Notice of SOUTHOLD TOWN BID OF APPLS 3 .. i 3111fe83-eb65-4.a3478Oe4-14f982857e9f kimf@southoldtownny.gov AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Suffolk Thies Disapproval based on an application forr-a permit to construct.additions and alterations to an existing single_ family dwelling,and construct an in ground swimming poo.l;.at 1) proposed additions:located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of'35,feet,2}the accessory,swimming pooi is located oth:eG than the code permitted rear yard;located_;at 95 Navy Street,Orient,NY 5CTM No.,1000 26-1 12:2;: 1;30 P.M VINCENT BERTAULT#74685E (Adjourned frpm June:12,2i?21)Applicant requests a Special Exception under;4rtArticle:RI,5ection.280.136:(13). The Applicant is:owner of subject propgrty.request ng authorization to establish an:Access6ry Apartment in an existing accessory structure,;at.95 Navy.5treet, anent,:N'r.SCTM#1000-26-1-12.2.- The Beard of Appeals will hearall persons or their representatives,desiring°to,be heard.at each heari4. ng; and/or. desiring to submGt,wr teen statements before the conclusion o,tach hearing. Each-hearm +gill not start C , earlier,than destgnafed above Files are available;for review o6 The Tavarti's lNeblink/Laserfche ureter Zoning Board of - Appeals(ZBA)�Roard Actions\Pending Cl�cli Link fi 2; p�/ 4 38 28;228 2040/we6hnkJRrowse:aspx�dlid 0 Contact our office at(t31)765 1805,or by email kmf@so.utholdtown ny:gav ,. Dated, Septer :ber 16;`2021 ZONING iB0AR"D 0.1 APPEALS LESLIt.KANES W.t]SMAN,CHAIRPERSON ..BYKim E..Fuentes. 5`4375 Main l oad (Office Location);;1Vlail to P.a. B ax 1179,Southold,NY 1197:1:.0959 SO.UTHOLD TOWN BO OF APPLS 4 3111fe83-eb65-4a34-8Oe4-1bf982857 kirnf@southoldtownnygoV AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Suffolk Tunes' State of New York,. County of,Suffolk The undersigned is the authorize designee.of.Tho Suffolk Times.a Weekly'Newspa0er published in Su ffotkpunty New York, 1-certif C : y that the;p. bi ic,no I e,a priftteOcopy. of ofWhich:fsattached hereto;. was:primed and ppbl'Is,4e, lhAhis neutirspaper on the following dates:: September 30,.202 f d" This'o Ka�lbeen,"d it- h v6r, S , ow�ppper oocoj)w _4 County.as a newspaper-o record it this tdU*j,0:nd'AsS'- bi i6 1110se gj e- opubltsfts' h uc notices: ................... ETot-T , Putnam 'Ot'fh-ted Name'': Subkdbed and sworn to before me, This 0.6:day cifOctobee 2021. Notary _Q STATE 'OF NEW YORK NTOTARY PUBI-Tc. Notary Public.Starnp s SION 1 SOUTHOLD TOWN BD OF APPLS BOARD MEMBERS .. Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �xOF soUr�® 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 Patricia Acampora o �® l® Southold,NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. �p� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento �l�100UNT11 Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631) 765-1809 9 Fax(631)765-9064 LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2021 at 10:00 AM PUBLIC HEARINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Town Code Chapter 280 (Zoning), Town of Southold, the following "IN PERSON" public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971-0959, on THURSDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2021: The public may ALSO have access to view, listen and make comment during the PUBLIC HEARING as it is happening via ZOOM WEBINAR. Details about how to tune in and make comments during the PUBLIC HEARING are on the Town's website agenda for this meeting which may be viewed at http://southoldtownnv.gov/agendacenter. Additionally, there will be a link to the Zoom Webinar meeting at http://southoldtownnv.gov/calendar.aspx. 1:20 P.M. - VINCENT BERTAULT #7467 — (Adjourned from June 17, 2021) Request for Variances from Article III, Section 280-15; Article XXIII, Section 280-124; and the Building Inspector's October 22, 2020 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling, and construct an in ground swimming pool; at 1) proposed additions located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet; 2) the accessory swimming pool is located in other than the code permitted rear yard; located at: 95 Navy Street, Orient, NY. SCTM No. 1000-26-1-12.2. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons or their representatives,desiring to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review on The Town's Weblink/Laserfiche under Zoning Board of Appeals(ZBA)\Board Actions\Pending. Click Link: http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0. If you have questions, please telephone our office at(631)765-1809, or by email:kimf@southoldtownny.gov. Dated: September 16, 2021 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LESLIE KANES WEISMAN, CHAIRPERSON By: Kim E. Fuentes 54375 Main Road (Office Location), Southold Mail to: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Town Hall Annex, 54375 NYS Route 25 O P.O.Box 1119 C#* Southold,New York 11971-0959 Fax(631) 765-9064 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DATE: September 3,2021 RE�'I�T��)�i�,C��ION_.S�I�SOI��;1GJ�BLI�:HEARINC Dear Applicant; Pursuant to the New York State Governor's announcement lifting many COVID-19 restrictions, the Town will now resume IN-PERSON meetings that are open to the public. For those who wish to attend the meeting virtually,for health and safety reasons,we will continue via Zoom Webinar, as well. Therefore, the October 7, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals Regular Meeting will be held BOTH in person in the.Town.Hall Meeting Room at 53095 Main Road, Southold AND via video.conferencing (Zoom Webinar), and a transcript will be provided at a later date. The public Will have an opportunity to.see and hear the meeting live, and make comments. mwralt r 'r 1. Yellow sign to post on your property a minimum of seven(7)days prior to your hearing,to.be placed not more than 10 feet from the front property line(within your property) bordering the. street. If you border more than one street.or roadway, an extra sign is supplied for posting on both street frontages. Posting should be done no later than September.30 2021. To avoid weather damage to your sign please affix it to a sturdy surface such as plywood. If your sign is damaged please call the office and we will provide you with another one. Prior to your public hearing, members of the Board of Appeals will each conduct a personal inspection of Your property.If a Board member reports that there is no signage visibly on display as required by law,your scheduled.hearing will be adiourned to a later date to ensure compliance with Chapter 55-1 (B)I of the Town Code. 2. SC Tax Map with property numbers. 3. Legal Notice of in person meeting,as well as video conferencing. Instructions for participation will follow, and will be posted on the Town's Website under the meeting date, and the Legal Notice section of Suffolk Times Newspaper. 4. Affidavits of Mailings and Posting to be completed by you, notarized, and returned to our office by September 27, 2021, verifying that you have properly mailed and posted. Please attach a photograph of the posting on your property with your affidavit of posting. 5. Instructions for Laserfiche/Weblink to view application. Instructions for ZBA Public Hearing Page 2 /�� MAILING INSTRUCTIONS: Please send by the following documents to all owners of property (tax map with property numbers enclosed)vacant or improved, which abuts and any property which is across from any public or private street. We ask that you send your mailings promptly so that if any piece is undeliverable, you can reach out to your neighbors to request their mailing addresses, and re-mail. Mailing to be done by September 20,2021. a.. Legal Notice informing interested parties of meeting being conducted IN PERSON and via video conferencing. (Enclosed) A WEBLINK to the meeting will be provide_d on the Town's Website under the date of the meeting. b. Your Cover Letter which should include your contact information, date and time of hearing, procedures for submitting written comment via email or USPS to our office. Recipients should 'be able to contact you for additional information. Furthermore, if recipients need:to contact the ZBA staff,they may telephone 631-765-1809 or email us at kimf@southoldtoLAM.gov or elizabeth.sakarellos@ town.southold.ny.us c. Instructions for Laserfiche/Weblink to view all pending applications. (Enclosed) Link to view pending applications: http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblinkBrowse.aspx?dbid=0. d. Survey or Site Plan depicting"as-built" and proposed improvements requiring ZBA relief. .The.Town's Laserfiche/Weblink files provides both location addresses and mailing addresses in their current Assessment Roll listing. (See.Link Below). Also,the Town Assessor's Office can be reached at 63.1-765-1937. Contact us via email or by phone if.you need further assistance. TownOfSouthold::Assessors>Assessment Books/Tax Rolls:2010-2019:,2019 http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/O/doc/1022250/Pa el.aspx. Please note that without your mailing receipts, the ZBA will be prevented from conducting your hearing,pursuant to Chapter 55 of the Southold Town Code and New York State Law. Please note that you or your representative are required to attend. If you or your representative are not present, the hearing will be adjourned to the next available hearing date. Please be reminded that New York State:Law requires the ZBA to follow the above specific policies. If for any reason,you are unable to prepare for your public hearing as instructed, please let us know. Kim E. Fuentes Board Assistant • 4,ivxyy`tr,:r s} r ,� f"' '�'4`"5 '-'£r-•.' a ate'' f1` ,�'�`�a C_. Z - ..a `". -ra, z .�- s ' N-E } Po,Rt" "r v�'"E, a ,.axe' : s h �� r ,'t4 &s { 41 IM #rte� �.s �say SO t.fid^x' u ', a"°... L,- ,y^ 'fi �`'. x.,. fg`".s.C.4y .r' i2-. �awro'Ma'dzsa ''�k"�s"` 3, wrr 1 r3fEl}«�'1• rz-r-.2<'" �c�,s3-'x'.��'�'y'.�^t•�� z �Y',�.r. '•''F �«sfy'�-y c�,'c Y,. �.�,�•,�`.y � yia" +�).=t '� � r • z fa 1�Y .r-„.,cfi,�y �v 3s„ '•„s i'4. • \'''�,.. -t'7+�- a �`t'f "'' �{. amx' ,yam':if •• +- ” ,.r `�: -,�t,:.-7-` 'f-r`.:sr•�„ t.:...tT�` $ z, ..7'7 t $�' a Y r°t...r• ,;,� r'�E.. i"'F r y : "�"tSS��y � � s '` �� t� � 9 `31 fip n as �'� �' }� $'✓,°�'r r. Z�� t '` i R'° •i. 3° 9 1 4 a w g P s �`qf '^•`'"¢^ey:. I -3•. � 3 ,�T.Yf�7•`� ' t`. S`�Y�'er��.,y1a� et{" min- 711P., ds a ^'�a k r 1`4aQ1z ' F ". ,4' a.r �.,r `+ '• "�a�ro� } `�}a'.. •.+ 't? a ?, 3 " `}- y� f u 7- .t� 'ys5 `' t ;' k r =• k .-'��' t`� @F�55, a¢°1 ;ii sx FP�'�W�«b3-;;:3r � '"..6. . a } it s ss TMs a a� � wf ,s �kL.: txy+ 5�6 sf - 4�rs- s s IN �, Y�rg4gir' $�ys2`: uFz i s erC � �xj -c C� ,w ? r•�''3..a rz 'k`�R�.�t M • *x o � --v, ki.., Sy�^�,P �,� $ f�`-t'sn �'�•., �' -p .�,�„" fe ,y` < �''�fi #? awn --*i:.• '`� -w- �i C,a,xrTr�•r £" '"t�' .:•fr-x x j4•"c �e�tA* �ia+,F- .t. 7?s c u9PS kh E',°ir' si �- r•c"+ r @ s x Q.r F `' ' ,,,x '_"'"r„' •''"'a'a..yfj �, �'' sq,, &axw, +Mie' 4.rt, a-. .,y .w:. '' '} �"w�,: "'srcrN 'gyp ,y...ro ti g M7.201 "i .r'``.. +r aA`a s,,ysay33' � �`� r. X34 k y-k,4r,.r.•�ys p. ,r,�r q�*a z'k"�.2�,"y'y 4 -*' �.°"y;.�" a r � 'w e N paaG�'i; `tr' ,, `C y3`i y "''s''.�, . ,a "`'�k' �Hy„a, ''y�"laai��'i�, .�,.* '�a'�a" g ,e•r"'Mai -k'*,, �` . ' "�•. La� a� rx4 'tn wct , s',�e' '+ v' ,fj z.n - �'• c' r,,,g .'' �`saF � ^t i �' •s€�' xth"`;I '+ a sF fy i z `K Y'" "f :dz .� yr � r`'� €_�:.: ��*r: ,.a�a�,�rt�.� � fig, •, � r �d a r � �',� �� '�" .r �. ..':��, r�.�., r{a � r;.��ar ,��x•„�.�w"�r'�. '" �z f .wrr',^e. $..`�� _ � fix' � Pg.�.� •^fit � ° �' ri�, s � �.�.� .rte .3.. as �.., .a�< �- ,,y��' "'i�•�rrq�`, �'.�i"'^ �x � •o o e , • o • • s e •• • • • • •, 0 • • i •. • • A • • • • Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 2 ---- - -- -- - - — _ —' -- -- - - - -Laserllche WebLlnk __ - ra:.__ - ry.ti9ebune I Hep 11 Alratlt SFpt 66i - ® .. H..e Browse" search-. Toi+mQfSaa,thold Zoning Board.of Appeals 129N - Board f Appeals 1 N Page mount ' �6 .x ? � ' PP --- —— — - -- --------- Zoning o - ' �_ f. (ZBA) to Alphabe kal Index 1 ,E hopertles B—dAmons "`-.- '-"-'�-"'• R.wfwh.Seatth Guides . = Path' - .. .. . . ... ... - E ! M1 Meetlng Schedules 11 TownCt5wt1i0WoninBBoa �..... .. .. ... .. ... ... .. ., .._. .. ...,.... .:.. .._ .. I _ of Appeals(ZPld -M4nrtewgendas/Legal NaMeslHeafings - I . ................_. .__......____. ... __.-..__..._ ...__._ ..._.._. ...._-....._ .... ...__. __...__...... . ------------- Creation _ --4 - 7 Creation date + taP—Png __...._.-.___ ............ l 7710JZ001 17:17:16PM _7- . .._._____ Rep.M } Last modified 5101711d17:14 AM 23 Spedal Event Permlts -. .._y E3 Tiallgfteq lementzmAofiklals ...... .. ..__. -. ... _ __ Wicles �3 No meratJata asslgrted i E?WPoom st code zeonoc Pl t - J. a ` Jur6dunon L75tNg t i '•'y,0_ ZBA Baok of Mapped 1977 E ging lots 189 t _ Schedules 5 Agreements•C m aas 8 Leases I Page l:of Above: Listed are types of records under ZBA Folder. ZBA Decisions can be found under. Board Actions: Click on "Board Actions"folder to open. . .1 f* L!. Y 5 � YX'l �' 4 YF Y_-'�'v Y%F-� 4r -� -"f_ "`) cF•.:. 5 ±'f 1. {-;:ES_ -5'!Te' . �47Etarta ta�� dfSr E� w � � L�serfll3e_WOU k ktq�ertzws� 3rc11 �7fSogthttldwZ[art+rBoarxiaf:AppeslS(Z6A3}BttatdA�atstlxPendilg? S M h "''`a. - - �e*�Esem.€�t x` �5"ef�-�c-.�. _.. k�s ��£ y„, � Eepdm$ I Ala„1� !' ...r-a'ciw' R' m '' '-' zu' '`'y'�06 `tial' . 9b25 411!*g6Aq LELy CARhIN AC N�ij �$LfitEALfv wffil r:lwn. .-EBtfl ( ENICAP5DILLC — - - __ - t o ,�b� i -eat t .,• 'f .. .. _. ___ ..._,_ _..__._.._ .__ __'_ -._ __ bTlK RECYCitNGT{�UCK" i 'a f ,71iE E ,C i ,Ueacian date �37aFmd ioo41 �6 ____. X7379 Sol tUnnSEasR.. f 33 1 Lastttt0diiett _ �x'7393-sp[Uer 100o-59--ss3 I 1 '8738sSE:HNFFies6i klyCon':k;6As Campground 1000-40-3=5 739ssE>iY�4,100b!50- 13:1 ,'. NO mElaijat3 ass}grle l` #7386860,;Bayvlew'brkle-LLC 1000-37:5�I'M _ .. ... _ 77387HacdCorner•1:0001i1-4'1 X7337 Flarid Comer SITE.PLAN-Arch Plans 1000-61-4-1 t'#7338-Minton brei:Trust 1000-128..2-20- 7740&Nappa 1 C00-98-1-1:5 Page 1 o411 Above, Lists all Pending Applications under Board Actions/Pending URL Address, Link is http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0 Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 3 Laserflche 4VeD Jhk ;;.w --. .. a xlyVre6taa,1 Het'1 AbP11t 1 s n1JJN} N de Browse', Search . TownO(So rhoid>Zonmg Board nt Appeals RRA1 Board`Acnons Board Actions Name _ _ .. .Page count " ME te 1957-1979 _ — --— t; .. _1 �1980.1999 _ .. Path ED 2000 - .� TownOtSotrttlold42oi1ing BoaN - cfAppeaB(ZBA)iBlsard Action. 2001 I; Creation date 2002 ' 71101200172'21S5 PM' - .ftap03 Last modified - �200,1 3RStZU17113G07AM - - _._.. ............ i 2005 (,i 1 ,i;Nletadata �2006 --'--- ---- {_ —= - - : - 2007 . No metadata assigned 2008 3 2009 &Rauhs' tl. 2010 ---- --'-' —------ --- ----------- -- - - - _._.__._. is I ,P�Fmlif�..Ufes7 �2011 --.._.._ ... in 2012.. . . I 953 2013 IL 2014 in 2015 �. cy 2016 s.go 2017. .j P nding, Above Board Actions are listed by-year. Click folder to open: .All Speclal:Exception . ap.plicati.ons:that require.Coordinated SEORA'Analysis are stored_in "Pending": _:. ea15128N Oo-.SrA-Acllwr 1U1T:�4. •.—� ipme-:"er ssarih iakpp15o1ahcld 3otpng eoaatto7lop, , - 2077 Name ...:.. ..,..... ..rte,. as-Ea>(i;7paoDarLes't... —t +fJ wire 36) - Board Atabrrs ....... .......... ... ........ . .._ _.......... _._—_.. _ _. ofA�1ua15UBh7+&wd Ana tao Bw[di:ttiens ':':i �bJ9 W Bmra Aaa9m oral..axe g Ja] Js e..wkal9m . laArrodHkd ' ' fJ]II2C1)9:]h51 AU �,�t �JU+. rre Bevdaane.rs Na melv�'Ya a>�j•J;1 Ar) )U Bond Xtiom A:9 Boa.tl AaUom 59 )U e0 aau.d MDo.a �j mca 8s s9a•arnrom ..�. . :ozs � lre Baa.a•cr+e:u .. Ale )) 9oar R1)de 63 BoarG Accom Above: See listed File Numbers. Click on file you are searching. Laserfiche Instructions ZBAFiles Page ��/ �LA n Page 4 ` kshel Above: In addition searching by file no.You can also use the above search tool by typing the ' name or title of the applicant. Laserfiche WebLmk cuRP ze Search � 'Sort results hy. Records Managemen!Search 97016 , 'nda>,ame Board Actions-83 page(s) . Choose field _ Page count:B3 Template name:Board Actions ��CS�r s, $ Page 3._:Colin and Kristen Cashel PROPERTY LOCATION:162 Lower Shingle HIR,iishet- s v...� Pae 4,,,19.2017#7016,Cashel SUM No.1000-9-1-26 minunus a Page pproval to rem9... Page 5...y 19,2017#7016,C7shel SUM N.70069-1.26 GRANT,thelances as- - a,w¢mK Page 9...COON&KRISTEN CASITEL SECTION 009 BLOC_. - - Page 20-Thomas Ahlgren(Cashel}PO B"342 Fishers Island.NY_. t: Show more information... f'7018, - - Board Actions-S6 page(s) PagecounC56 TemP)atendme:Hoard Acton 'i Page 48._9:30A.M,-COUN CASHELANDvadances under Article ANN ., : Page 48.,,antt(s)ICRI$TEN CASHEL#7016-rtequest proposed trolls located 1.othertha,.. - - a'show more information_ Above:Shows you files that can be found using aphrase, name or title. Qr.you can search by Tax Map No. (District, Block_and tot) wising the format 1000411.71-1,' Laserfiche WebUnk HE a .:.._.... - ...._,._.. _ ._..: .__.. ,.:...__....._:._ -.:..,.:.� _ - MY WebLntc.)•.tyelp t Phoui 1:Sh Home Browse search : Tot4TiOfscuthokl�3oring Boar'A bfAppea)s(ZBAJ>Mlntltes(Aiq- gehdas/[egal Hotlres/)iearlrtgs Minutes/Agendas/Legal N o sec i Notices/Hearings --a 1957-1979 .« w a Entry Properties. .. r--20062009 ._.. .. Path .. TrnwKNSc:uVx;dV,o:ting board C 2010 ,... of AV,reals 2071 .. .... .........__._ .-..:._._.._ fZBA)IS+tnun�:':genda�/Legal ' t1ClkP5/tt23n�tg1 ' Y 2012 : Creation date -!it a,oe, — 2.57:eC PM ;. a.2014 Last nmdified - ys5 2015 _.:_..:. ._.... ._... .. 1Z/16l2016 y.•5;1AFf-0 ... _ -.. -- _.._.._... .. ,-_I 2016 .. - - ... .. ._ No—!.data assgrxd Page t oft .. _ 71 Eno Above:Also, Minutes, Agendas, and Hearing Transcripts can be viewed. Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 5 .Laserflche WebUnk - - =Yc. MY Neti[iN41 Help I Atw`u{�.,, Home Browse Search:• 46shleanr?gs?2017 2017 +.Name ilk r �,+"�ZiwOt/052077 —� _ — 7 - }�:i—*-•P- `_ .; Q Z13A-07/05/2077 gge>da 4:- path Path ZBA-01/OS/M17 Hearing TownOtSarthddVaning Board ' ..- .. ... _ ..I DLAppeais t i 211"11052O771N .. 3 `• (LBA)1RA�.nUDes/ endas/L ___ __ __ __ . Notices(Heartngs\2017. t ;�TBA-01/192D17 Age da 2 .� CreatlDil date• 12/16/20162:15:14 PM 0-.j ..:.._. ... ....... .. .__.. .....:...: .. ...._ ......., ..._- _.... _... .... -. ,.,...._._._...__..._.. ZBA-0J022017 7 Last modified .i -ZBAai,0212017 Agenda a 6119/20174S3:59PM Ej ZBA•02162=17 Hearing 45 i 'X>M@tadafa'... I ej ZBA-02/02/2017 LN 3 ZBA-07/16/2017Agenda 3 .-..,.__. i No metadata asstgied �. ..._. .. ... .. _ _...—. -.. .... - .. j ZBA-02/1620175pec141 3 �wcBt,P.cwK3 i ZBA-031022017 _. - - 7,_. vrclhaaKilrP,?Pst` ,at? '. , P1, ZBA-03/022017 Pgenda a ,. Ek ZBA-031022017 Hearing .- .. .65 .`F ZBA-03M220171N ZBA•03/16/2O117 Agenda 3 t :Y ZBA-03/16r20775p-daf 3 ..._.._....... _ ZSA-O4W-2017 .. 5 ... _ R .,I •= Z&Y03106f2017 Agenda 4 ... . 2[tA4a1062077 Hea:rtilg45 Above .Agendas; Minutes.and Transcripts are in chronological order. Revised 6/15/2020 NOTICE OF HEARING The following application will be heard by the Southold Town Board of Appeals at Town Hall , 53095 Main Road , Southold : The application will also be available VIA ZOOM WEBINARM Follow linkmhttp://southoldtownny.gov/calendar NAME : BERTAULT , VINCENT #7467 SCTM # mE 1000-26- 1 - 1202 VARIANCE : YARD SETBACK LOCATION OF POOL REQUEST: ADDS & ALTS TO DWELLING , CONSTRUCTION OF SWIMMING POOL DATE : THURS. , OCT . 71 2027 1 :20 PM You may review the file(s) on the town's website under Town Records/Weblink: ZBA/Board Actions/Pending. ZBA Office Telephone (631 ) 765-1809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD-OF APPEALS Appeal No. SOUTHOLP NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT_ OF In the Matter of the Application of: . MAILINGS. . (Name of Applicant/Owner) SCTM No: 1000- (Address of Property). (Section,.Block.& Lot) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW.YORK I, (. ) Owner, "/).,Agent Agent e !/ /'✓ ,� �°�'1 /�� residing.atl New York; being duly sworn, deposes and says that: On the . day of /✓b , 201y_/ I personally.mailed at the United. 'States Post Off ce:in ! New York, by CERTIFIED'MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in Prepaid envelopes addressed.to current property owners shown on the current.assessment.roll Verified from the official records on file with the Assessors, or( ) County Real . Property Office, for.every property.which abuts and is across a public or private street, or vehicular right=of--way of record, surrounding the applicant's.property. Signature). Sworn to before me thi AMY M BEASLEY day of NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK Qualified in Suffolk County 7�/M_ul.4 Reg.No.01 BE5039767 otary Public) Commission Expires February 27, 20 Z3 PLEASE list on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. All original USPS receipts and mailing confirmations to be submitted to the ZBA Office along with this form completed, signed and notarized. 'PostalPostal CERTIFIED o RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAILORECEIPT Domestic Mail Only Domestic Mail Only P� m 7. m IM For delivery information,visit our website at wimmusps.cornO. �- •ire rFt .40 •. -E •FtU .I`' . I Certified Mail Fee I Certified Mail Fee v. ; Q- .7_t 11952 Ir $3.'l_r ' 09��. O $ I)f} $Extra SeRoes&Fees(check box,add fee asp -ate) Il i + Extra Services&Fees(checkbox add fee ep 11 te) I N ❑Retum_Receipt(hardcopy).. $ .y�( L(u �' El Return Receipt(hardcopy) $. - !I �. ❑RetumRecelpt(electronic), ,$ ttl't 1"Ifi Postmark- Q ❑RetumRecelpt(electmnlc), $ •• d;l--vimQ Postmark Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ — Here )3. -[]Certified Mail Restricted Delivery. $' � •Here r '- .• O ❑Adult Signature Required $ 0_ . I_ Adult Signature Required $• []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ •�- - -•i• ❑A Sag Restdcted Delivery$ rr O Postage 11.7 Ln Postage $0.78' :.. tTl $ (19i A7/2021 mo TotelPostageandFeea „_'il9/17121Jry1 I Total Postage and Fees i � $-,. ...i $7.58: _. $i..,: •c. I 1$7.58 Sent Sept TO gonia •0.=:Gesell ru Evair,Lew d '& Lynn- Lewis ` a - �7 r - ---- { 7 of endhpt:No.:o��F#ozNo:--- street anZf f No.,or iV Box No. A t 9 E __4.0 W. 24th St. , f �` Riverside Dr. _ ----------- _ _________________ Cary,§tate 21P+4� ---- -------------- - ----------------- ---- Ciry$taie,2ia+d�Rumson, NJ 07760' New York, NY 100.10' PS Form 3800,April 2015,PSN'7530-02-000-9047 - - 3800,April 20151 1 11Reverse . • ' • CERTIFIED MAIURECEIPT CERTIFIEDMAILP RECEIPT . M � Domestic Mail Only Domestic Mail Only m o C1e X71191 0 A L 7E_ Ori0 P IF TM I � Certified Mail Fee i Certified Mall Fee X3.75, 0952 rr $ $3.•75 0952. , Er $ e 06 Extra Services&Fees check a 06 Extra Services&Fees(che*bo�4 add fee ate) ( bogy,add fee prDrtdate) -t , Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ I I RIM N ❑Return Receipt(hardeopy); ,$ UJ�I�i []• ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $,%I�,.. �i— PostmarkO ❑Return Receipt(electronic) sU off Postmark 1 0 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ Here O [I Certified Mall Restricted Delivery".$ a:1 f11 I Here' D ❑Adult Signature Required $ — 0 ❑Adult Signature Required ❑Adult Sig natureRestricted Delivery$ ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ _ " Postage Ln Postage �I 1.7 V ;1 - 11,78 rn $ b9/17/2021 � m Total Postage and Fees ' 1]9/17/21121; p Total Postage and Fels 0 r _ � - pp 3.5u a t.r?17 rq $ - $ru e rro n� sentro,Lawrence Bernstein. , T�iomas E. Reinecke_.&_Maria R---_R�� k�__: __ O ir'et an--A l tfo.:�i`�O Boir Rin. r- Sveei anifA�Clff---of A-Boz Noi---' - - - Lineman Ave. 20 Vincent Street. ----------------- =--------------------• - Nity State Z/Pt4 airy,State Zlf�t4®---------------- � ------------------------- Closter, NJ 07.624 Orient, NY 11957PS :11 1 I 1 111•,• - 3800, 17530-02-000-9047- - See Reverse for Instructions Postal CERTIFIED o RECEIPT —DomesticOnly M � For delivery information,visit our website at www.usps.corne. > Certified Mail Fee t :C i{,..•,�,tt„�7'•i:'' -�a.Q' `$3.75 i - (1Q.c_Y2' - s ,` •1 t. _ { Extra Services.&Fees(check box,add:fee ^p cte) - Il b'• bifi tii:T.,��.. .•� �. ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy)' $. .. - .. is C ❑Return Receipt(elee tonic). $ it 1 IIQ_ Postmark { �,,.,• q-;n` ,•i C7. ❑Certlfled Mall.Restricted Delivery $' _ - - Here- C3' ❑Adult Signature Required - ❑AdeltSignatureRestrlctedDelNery$ l Postage u) I 1 a 78 ! o Total Postage end,Fees 119/17I2021 V $7.58. - N- Sent To Ellen J. -McNeilly '9rieei andApf ICfo.;or PCfeox No: - �` 70 Vincent St. - == = ===--------- cin:s`raie,ziP+a�'�Ori`ent- NY 19 57• '' r 461 1 1 1 1 1 000-9047 See Reverse for Instructions CPI11 Property Owners/Information 'Postal 26-1-4 -0 CERTIFIED MAILP RECEIPT Ellen J. McNeilly LrI Domestic mail onlyj 70 Vincent St., P.O. Box 314 RMJ Orient,NY 11957 o Neon ' t q j F` Certified Mail Fee'3305 0952, 06 26-1-6 Extra Service 9&Fees(checkbox,a$fee ❑RetumRecelpt(hardcopy) $fr ftfl postmark Lawrence Bernstein Retum.Reeelpt(electronic) $--- ] ' C3 ;O Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ a•i, �'�' — Here 20 Vincent Street1 1-3 '" ❑Adult Signature Required $ Orient,NY 11957 o ❑Adult signature Restricted Delivery$ Postage p I $ 1�.7� �.t9/17/2021 26-1-11.1 C3 Total Postage and Fees 5 Sonia O. Gesell C3 $ fU SenS,To 7 Riverside Dr. � ?25�and BYR.,o &130 oto t - i Rumson,NJ 07760 79__W,.__12th__St:_,-_Apt'---10&--------------------------------- crty s-a-e,z1A+am NeW York; NY 10011 26-1-12.1 Evan Lewis& Lynn Lewis Service 40 W. 24th St., Apt. 9E •stal � o - New York,NY 10010 co CERTIFIED ,.q Domestic Mail Only I . . " Ln 26-1-21 op at Brogan Family Irrevocable Trust r,- Certified Mai!Fee 09522595 Village Lane IRear co 3.75$ iib. Extra Sery ee9&Fee9(checkbox,add fee a e) Orient,NY 11957 r9 []Return Receipt(hardcopy) C3 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ r�1_-�!_� Postmark 3 Ocertified Mali Restricted Delivery $ Here 26-1-24 r3 ❑Adult Signature Required $ r ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ Thomas E. Reinecke & Maria R. Reinecke Postage $0.73 V/ 42 Lindeman Ave n $ 09,/17/2021 Total Postage and Fees Closter,NJ 07624 C3 $ $7.58 to Sent To Brogan Family Irrevocable Trust 26-1-25 C3 -Street anifApL l(o.,o>PO i3oz N---------------------------------- S . - -------------=------ 2595 VillagLe_Lane IRear 220 Navy St. Trust crn sta�a;ziP+d&Qr_ient,� TY 119'57 79 W. 12th St., Apt. 10A } i New York,NY 10011 SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION M COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY ■'Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signature ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X a;G ❑Agent So that we can return the card to you. a1U ❑Addressee I I ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B• Rice vby(Pri ted �C..n ate of Delivery j or on the front if space permits. Q(Q( 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is deliveryaddres ifferent from item 1? 0 Yes r If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No i. 1 Attn: 220 Navy St. Trust j 79 W. 12th St., Apt. 10A New York, NY 10011 j � I 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® I II I IIII'I I'll I'I I II illi I I I l Il l II I ll IIIIlII III 11 Adult❑Adult SiSignature Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registe Mail RestrictedI ertified Mail® Deliveryd I 9590 9402 6227 0265 8413 99 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑signature ConfirmationTM ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature.Confirmation _2._Artiele.Number_(TranSfeP fioni 4 e ce la SO ElCollect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Insured Mail I 1 7 0 2 0 ,1 0 6 4 0 1 1 0,17 01 9 8'7 0 4 5 5 6 ❑Insured Mail Restricted Delivery t. t l t l !! . I i i ! ! t I.I I q '(over$500) PS Form 3811,JUIy 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Reroi`rt 1 COMPLETEi COMPLETE THIS SECTION r-"9ELIVERY r A. Signature 1 ■ Complete-items 1,2;and 113 Age X ■ Print your name and address,on the reverse 6 dre see so that we can return the card to you. B R ived by(Printed Name) C. D e f D (very y ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, C-1 ZC or on the front if space permits. Yes 11. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No I i )Attn:'' Brogan Family Irrevocable Trust"'',, r 2595 Village Lane 1 Rear Orient, NY 11957 3. Service Type ❑Priority all Express®E3 Adult Signature o Registered Mallm II 1111111 IIII III I II IIII I I I II II I II III I III I II III ❑Adult� Signature Restricted Delivery E3RegisteredMall Restricted ertiflad Mail® Delivery ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation- ` I 9590 9402 6227 0265 8413 44 ❑Signature Confirmation ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery 2. Article_Number_(Transfer from service label) ❑Insured Mail. �l0 2 0 0 6 4❑ r 0 01= 98701,45-18, i ❑Insured Mail Restricted Delivery t t� rt s�l �tttl I !+. ! tltt� ltl- (over$500) Domestic Return Receipt PS Form 3811,July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 COMPLETE •N COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. �• A. Signa r t ■ Print your name and address on the reverse . ❑Agent i so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee t te)ceii�6cl■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, by(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery j or on the front if space permits. ; 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is deliveryi�qdress different from item 17 ❑Yes ) Attn: Lawrence Bernstein IfYES,.bnter,�deli -address below: ❑No > 1 20 Vincent Street -013 ah�u Orient, NY 11957 3. Service Type �m��, ' ❑Priority Mail Express® III 111111 IIII 111 I II IIII 1 I I II 111111 111 II IIIIIII ❑Aduly,Sigature 13Registered Mail- ElAdult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mall Restricted i e 9590 9402 6227 0265 8414 67 13 Certified Mail Restricted Delivery 13Sig Signature Confinnationrm } ❑Collect on Delivery 11 Signature Confirmation i 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label) 11Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery i ❑Insured Mail. ! 7 0 21 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 2 0944 3,367j ❑insured Mall Restricted Delivery t l t s t t l l l ! r i., r (over$500) } PS Form 381t1,tJuly 2020'PSN 7530 -02-000-9053 I Domestic Return Receipt COMPLETE •N COMPLETE THIS SECTIONON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A Signature ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X A7 LAent '�(� g so that we can return the card to you. 1Z.� �v ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. R29 iv by(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery J or on the front if space permits. / r�cr1id4i"IZ4'—from 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different item 17 ❑Yes If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No l Attn: ' jThomas E. Reinecke & I Maria R. Reinecke 42 Lindeman Ave. 1 i Closter, NJ 07624 ` 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mall ExpressoQ Adult Signature EI Registered MaIITM l J E)Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted! 111111111111 I1I 111 I I1 illi III 11 1 Il III 1 111 I I I iAKCertified Mail® Delivery i 9590 9402 6227 0265 8413 75 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConflrmationTIA ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation- 2-Article_Number_(rransfer from-gervi ee label) ❑Collect an Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery . ❑Insured Mall ; '7P211. Q 4 a 0 011 98 7 0 ?4 5J ❑Insured Mail Restricted Delivery %! (over$500) PS Form 3811,July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return fleceipt! SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SE(.;--flON COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DE_ �RY j ■ Cainplete-item'1 2,and 3, A Signa ■ P,ilpt your name and address on the reverse ❑Agent > I so that we dan return the card to you. ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. ceiveId by(Pdnte Name) ate of Delivery or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is de i a dress different m ite ❑Yes i Attn: Ellen J. McNeilly :, If YES,enter delivgry addressbeio ❑No 70 Vincent St. �- Orient, NY 11957 ;- SEP 2 20P1 UC Y 3. Service Type 7195 I ❑Priority Mail Express® r II I ❑Adult Signature O Registered Mai I ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery [3 Registered Maill Restricted IIIIII IIII III1111111111111111111111111111111 9590 9402 6227 0265 8414 74 11 Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Signature confirmation"m I ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation I --Article-Number_(Transfer from servlce_label)--� ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Insured Mail I 7021 '0350 2302 0944 3343 ❑Insured Mail Restricted Delivery (over$500) PS Form X81;1(,duly 2Q20 PSN1530;02QOp,tab53 f Domestic Return Receipt SENDER: CO.MPLETE THIS SECTION, COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY i ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. K Agent l ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ❑Addressee I so that we-can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the•backof the mailpiece, B. Received by 1 i ed Name) C. Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 17 ❑Yes ' Attn: Evan Lewis & Lynn Lewis. 3&!gna tu' If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No J 40 W. 24th St., Apt. 9E ) New York, NY 10010 � rc I I � 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mau Express® i 111 IIIIII IIII IIIIII IIII I I I II II 1111111111111111 ❑Adult Signature? 13 Registered Ma(ITm ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted l ,Certified Mail® „ Delivery i 9590 9402 6227 0265 8414 05 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Signature confirmation- I ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation l 2. Art(cle Number(Transfer from service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted De((very l ❑Insured Mail 7 02 1 43 5 0 D 0 D;2; 0 9 4 4:+3:411 ❑ovsure er Malo Restricted Delivery. PS Form 3811,July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt i i SENDER: • .N COMPLETE THIS SECTIONON DELIVERY i ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Sig tura ■ Print your name and address on the reverse ❑Agent so that we can,return the card to you. ❑Addressee ; I B. eceiv by(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery l ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 17 ❑Yes Attn: Sonia 0. Gesell If YES,enter delivery address below: 0N V 7 Riverside Dr. Rumson, NJ 07760 r 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® i III IIIIII IIII II III IIII I I I II II I II I I III I II I I III 13-Adult Sig nature Restricted Delivery E3RegisteredMail F-W,:uj 9590 9402 6227 0265 8414 36 jit ❑ ertified Mail® Delivery Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmaUonT'" + El-Collect on Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation I __2._ArtlCle NUmber(Transfer from service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Insured Mail 702 1b 3§w i0 ,{l 2l l d`9 4 4113 81 G i ❑Insured Mall Restricted Delivery i t 11.,i t iQ r r 1 r 1 , i t r /" (over$500) I ' PS Form 3811,July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt Mnow4 � n i TOWN OF S'OUTHOLD ZONING BOARD*OF APPEALS. . : . . - SOUTH&D;NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT. O F In the,Matter of the Application of POSTING Vincent Bertault .. ,.. . , SCTNI No. 1000-.26-1-.12.4: (Name'of Applicants) (Section,.Block&Lot.) - COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK h Vincent Bertault, residing„at 95 Navy Street. .. Orient, New YorkNew fork, being.duly sworn, depose and say that; I.am the (x) Owner.or(. )Agent for owner of the subject property One day of �� ✓201'✓, I personally placed the Town s Official Poster on'subject,property located.at: 95 Navy Street, Orient, NY SCTM#1000-26-1=12,2. indicating the date of hearing and nature of application noted thereon; securely upon,subject.property; located ten(10) feet or,closer from the street or right- f-Way(driveway entrance)facing the street,or _ facing each.street or right-of-way entrance,t and that; Thereby confirm that the Poster has remained in place for seven(7) days prior to,the date of the subject h aring,date,whi h ing date was shown to be October 7, 2021 (Owner/Agen Signature)° Sworn to before me this Day of Cheryl Simons Notary Public,State of New York No.31-4970341 ��r�� Cuglifled In Suffolk county_ �'� (Notary Public ssion Expires February 4,2D� * near the entrance or driveway entrance of property, as the area most yisible to passerby Ellen McNeilly PO Box 314 Orient NY 11957 631-323-3989 ejmcneilly(@earthlink.net March 15, 2021 VED Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 21101ing Board 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA Application 7467 & 7468SE Filed 12/21/2020 95 Navy Street, Orient NY SCTM # 1000-26-1-12.2 Dear Chair Leslie Kanes Weisman and Board Members: I am the resident owner of 205 Willow Street, a corner property at Vincent Street, opposite the subject site's Willow Street frontage (Taxlot 26-1-4). 1 am also the owner of 70 Vincent Street (Taxlot 26-1-5), approximtely 50 feet to the northeast of the subject site, as Vincent Street becomes Willow Street at the curve. I have been an active member of the Orient community for over 30 years. Unfortunately, I missed the March 4th hearing which is now adjourned to March 18, 2021. 1 await the upload of the missing elements of the application as listed in the "application checklist". With only the HPC initial and amended plans as guidance, I assume that little has changed based on the stated proposed lot coverage of 1'7.2%. Without plans, among other key documents, neither the Board nor I can fully respond in an effective and relevant manner. If document uploads are made subsequent to this submission, I will do my best to modify comments if applicable. Inter-Agency Relationships and Historical Perspective As actions relating to this subject property demonstrate, it is critical that all agencies recognize and support each other and Town law on behalf of the community. The Applicant's strategic approach to filing application(s) incrementally acts to narrow the scope for decision-making, but represents a distraction from fully appreciating the historical perspective of the Applicant's multitude of on-going efforts (with or without permits and approvals) to achieve the larger vision for the subject property with a level of benefits and "relief' that are excessive, don't constitute the minimum variance necessary,and are in total disregard to the special quality of the historic district within the Village of Orient. Ellen McNeilly 1 To support this claim, I direct the Zoning Board to my submissions to the HPC where the Applicant first presented his full vision (ie. including the Barn), then amended to exclude the Barn.' The HPC denial dated January 4, 2021 is specific to the amended plan's failings and lack of responsiveness by the Applicant; however, the denial does not speak to violations of the prior Certificate of Appropriateness dated June 18, 2014 that allowed for the-relocation of the shed and barn buildings and made certain directives towards handling the mature trees on site. Specifically, the Applicant removed mature holly trees and continues to neglect and dismiss the viability of the large Willow tree (on Willow Street). This issue has been ignored by HPC and Building Department Code Enforcement despite numerous notifications and reports, including the verbal abuse from the Applicant towards me. Moreover, the on-going fagade/fenestration/framing work (without approval) on the Barn not only violates the HPC decision which expected "the structures (to be] restored and preserved as is", but also is inconsistent with the ZBA decision dated April 17, 2014 which relied of the Applicant's stated intent to "restore and preserve". 2 To date, the cottage appears untouched, as the Applicant plows ahead with extensive below grade infrastructure already completed along with the transformative work on the Barn (not reviewed by HPC). The permitted relocation of the shed and barn is complete, yet a final CO for this approved work has not been obtained, as outstanding issues are identified with each inspection. At a 2020 HPC hearing, the Applicant stated that there was no need for a Zoning Board application for the amended plan (house enlargement, shed enlargement/conversion, new pool). Clearly, it does. I strongly suggest that the Zoning Board, with its broader decision-making authority, as defined in Section 280-142 and 280-143, to "fully see the forest for the trees" of the Applicant's disingenous statements and unlawful actions, the history of the subject site, agency decisions, and the neighbor and community impacts of the proposed plan in its most complete form/vision. To be brief for this ZBA submission, the attached HPC submissions (September 26, 2020 and October 20, 2020) do not include the supporting Appendices. Proposed Plan with Barn is located at TownOfSouthold > Historic Preservation Commission > Pending Files >2020 > HPC 08/18/2020 > Bertault. The Amended proposal subject to the HPC denial is located at TownOfSouthold > Historic Preservation Commission > Pending Files >2020 > HPC 09/29/2020 > Bertault—95 Navy Street amended proposal 2 See progress photos of barn reconstruction. Ellen McNeilly 2 ZBA Application 7467: Setbacks, Front and Rear Yards The narrow scope of this'area variance speaks to the enlargement of the single family cottage, the enlargement and conversion of the accessory shed to pool cabana, and the pool itself. Clearly, the HPC had issues with the proposed house enlargement overall and the location of the front door, in particular, which may impact the front yard determination at Navy Street. As regards the enlargement of the shed to a cabana, my HPC submission confirms that it is unnecessary and alters the shed building envelope to make it unrecognizable as a historic reference, keeping in mind that all structures on the subject property can be viewed from both Willow and Navy Streets, thereby impacting the community visual expectations of the Orient historic district. Perhaps the cabana use can be incorporated into the first floor of the barn, limiting the proposed residential unit to the second floor only. The placement of the pool may be the best position; however, mature evergreen screening is essential to protect and buffer neighbors from noise and the like. Due to the incompleteness of the application file, there is no verification of zoning/livable floor area by the Dept of Bldg, as the property card notes are unreadable. It is possible that the proposed enlargements and use conversions may exceed 20% lot coverage and should be verified as required. Regardless of the lot coverage of the proposed plan, the additional usage/occupancy at the subject site reflects environmental concerns already noted in the record. Since sanitary/drainage systems have been completed work in advance, the Board should confirm compliance with regulations. ZBA Application 7468-SE: Accessory.Barn to Accessory Apartment The provision to create accessory apartments is supported by the Town. How it gets applied to this particular Applicant's request requires thorough review, especially since it impacts the facade, framing and fenestration of the structure which has already been altered (without permits) and is inconsistent with the Applicant's stated intent and ZBA and HPC expectations of"preserve and restore as is".3 The Board should be cognizant of the fact that interior layout will no doubt impact the exterior treatment and would restrict the HPC review and goal to maintain historic references. Any illegal work at the Barn should not be.accepted or considered "as built" seeking legalization. The livable area calculation for the Barn in order to satisfy the 750 square foot maximum is problematic. An annual inspection and renewal of the CO by the Building Department is required for this conversion. However, if it requires the Applicant to make the filing, I have little confidence of the Applicant's compliance. I am concerned that the livable area could easily be expanded, possibly creating two units, to achieve a maximum rental income from a non-family member. Without strict oversight and 3 See most recent photos of barn. Ellen McNeilly 3 V� verification, to think that the garage and workshop space will remain "not livable" is just foolhardy. The Applicant's claim he has no way to live, and that his mother-in-law or a future affordable housing tenant will be the occupant is disingenous given his determination to do what he wants, when he wants and the way he wants. First, the Applicant utilizes his Manhattan address, 320 East 18th Street, NYC on the building permits, a two-family townhouse owned by his mother-in-law, Ms. Fukuko Yahagi Harris and her husband, Mr. Brian J. Harris, according to public record. Since his purchase of the subject property along with the leasing of a commercial space on Village Lane (Opties & Dinghies) in Orient, he was able to find suitable rental accommodations locally. Recommendations Based on the history of the subject site, its current Certificate of Occupancy, the actions by the Zoning Board, Preservation Commission, SC Department of Health Services, Town Code Enforcement, and a review of the incomplete Zoning Board application dated December 21, 2020, 1 strongly urge the Zoning Board to: • Take nothing for granted and don't give the Applicant the benefit of the doubt. • Undertake rigorous review of the application; demand all necessary and pertinent documents. • Consider the self-created hardship; determine if this third variance is truly warranted. • Keep in context the full record with public comment, recognizing the fact of the HPC denial and the violations of the 2014 HPC decision that go unnoticed and without consequences. • Fully understand the plans for fencing, retaining walls, and tree removal, as concerns by neighbors that trees shared along the property lines will be immediately destroyed and/or die a slow death if roots are cut, increasing risk for fallen trees, property damage, health/safety hazard and significant expense without clearly assigned responsibility. • With any approvals, don't hesitate to use the Board's authority to apply strict conditions, deadlines, periodic proof of compliance and any other directive to protect neighbors and the community at large. Sincerely, Ellen McNeilly Enclosures Ellen McNeilly 4 Vv\� ZBA Application 7467 & 7468SE 95 Navy Street, Orient NY EXHIBITS McNeilly - HPC Letter Dated September 26, 2020 McNeilly - HPC Letter Dated October 20, 2020 Subject Site: Barn Photos & Tree Removal on Shared Property Line Ellen McNeilly 5 Ellen McNeilly PO Box 314 Orient NY 11957 631-323-3989 eimcneilly(abearthlink.net September 26, 2020 Historic Preservation Commission Edward Webb, Chairman .Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Application Dated 7/15/2020 95 Navy Street, Orient NY SCTM # 1000-26-1-12.2 Dear Chairman Webb and Board Members: I am the resident owner of 205 Willow Street, a corner property at Vincent Street, opposite the subject site's Willow Street frontage (Taxlot 26-1-4). lam also the owner of 70 Vincent Street (Taxlot 2671- 5), approximtely 50 feet to the northeast of the subject site, as Vincent Street becomes Willow Street at the curve. I have been an active member of the Orient community for over 30 years. Based on the history of the subject site, its current Certificate of Occupancy, the actions by the Zoning Board, Preservation Commission, SC Department of Health Services, Town Code Enforcement, and a review of the Proposed Plan (July 2020) under consideration', I-strongly urge the Historic Preservation Commission to undertake the Recommendations below: 1. Recognize and address the violations of Commission's June 2014 decision. Large, full grown Holly trees were removed, not relocated; mature, historic Willow tree neglected, not preserved. Declared "dead" by Applicant, contrary to Certified Arborist evaluation that is "thriving". Multiple attempts to remove the Willow tree, as recent as this month, cutting of branches required notification of Town Code Enforcement. Proposed plan excludes the required "relocation" of Holly trees and "preservation" of historic Williow, as if they never existed, nor subject to conditions of the Commission's approval. See Appendix: • May 22, 2003 - ZBA#5218—Subdivision by prior owner to prep for 2005 sale to Applicant(Mr. Bertault) for$725,000 • November 18, 2004 - SC Department of Health Services— Environmental Review Letter • April 17, 2014 ZBA#6729— Relocate Existing Barn and Shed • June 18, 2014_ Historic Preservation Commission Cert. of Appropriateness—Relocate Barn and Shed • Building Permits Issued: #39186-Z (9/15/2014); #41328-Z(1/30/2017); #44198-Z (9/23/2019) • Violation Notifications and Code Enforcement (2020 & Prior) Ellen McNeilly 1 2. Narrow scope of review to only the proposed enlargement of the single-family house. The proposed change of use of the accessory barn to accessory apartment and accessory shed to pool cabana is not guaranteed an approval by the Zoning Board. The change of use informs all aspects of architectural function and design, as it seeks to satisfy occupant desires and building codes. Accessory Barn: It is self-evident that the modernist design to the accessory barn is inappropriate, negatively impacts the character of the historic district, and is unnecessary given the existing fenestration system. If the accessory barn is not converted to habitable space, the restoration the existing structure can be achieved. Accessory Shed: No detailed plans are provided that show the proposed conversion and enlargement of the shed to a pool cabana use. Detailed plans are required not only for architectural evaluation, but also for building code review, as the recently adopted Town code relating to pool houses is very specific as to size (max 350 sf), number of rooms (limited to a single bathroom —sink and toilet only), requirement that plumbing fixtures must drain to a Suffolk County Health Department-approved sanitary system in a conforming location, among other issues. Lastly, the proposed enlargement would alter the building envelope of existing 180 -+ square foot shed structure, making it unrecognizable as as a historic, accessory shed. Again, the change of use requires Zoning Board approval and is not guaranteed, and if denied, the restoration of the existing accessory shed structure can be achieved. Therefore, it is reasonable to suggest that the Commission should reserve judgment relating to the accessory barn and shed structures until after the Zoning Board of Appeals makes a determination as the proposed change of use dramatically impacts the treatment of fagade, fenestration, roofline, among other items. With the historical context in mind along with the added visual and verbal verifications by the Owner/Applicant, Mr. Bertault, the following outlines many serious concerns with the current proposed plan. Original Vision for Subject Site Misleading The incremental approach to seeking special permits has revealed that statements made in obtaining the 2014 approvals to relocate the accessory barn and shed structures misled the agencies and the public as to the Applicant's true vision which is now in full view as represented by the current proposed plan. For example: 1. The ZBA#6729 decision reflected the Zoning Board's understanding that: The Applicant wishes to preserve and restore both accessory structures and to relocated them to eliminate the current need to drive cars over the existing septic system and to create more open space for gardening and recreation in the center of his property" Ellen McNeilly 2 2. In response to Patricia Moore's opposition letter dated March 13, 2014, the Appli s /I representative and project architect Gary R. O'Conner, states: l "As per the testimony at the public hearing, Mr. Bertault shared his vision of restoring the barn to its original integrity and character" ... 'As discussed during the hearing, the barn shall be used to house a vehicle and maritime equipment." It is clear that the 2014 special permit applications to relocate the accessory barn and shed was the first step towards a larger vision that generates significant impacts and is inconsistent with the Commission's mission and the purpose of the historic district. As such, the earlier statements made by the Applicant regarding the intent to preserve the "original integrity" and "character" were knowingly false and misleading. The proposed plan reflects the Applicant's pursuit of"owner enjoyment" and increased property value to offset the $725,000 purchase. The proposed plan is not a proposal to seek relief from a hardship inherent in the subject site. Upon purchase of the property, Mr. Bertault was fully aware of its limitations and constraints. Since the 2014 approvals, work to relocate the accessory structures has taken place; however, not always in accordance with the approval conditions. Violation and Enforcement The Commission's Certificate of Appropriateness issued on June 18, 2014 clearly stated that: "the applicant has agreed to make a good faith effort to preserve the property's existing.trees and shrubs (particularly the holly trees) during the relocation process, and a letter ... by Michael Johnson of Johnson Tree Co., Orient, outlining how to protect the willow tree adjacent to the proposed location of the barn structure ... will be part of the applicant's final building permit application ... " Holly Trees No "good faith effort" was made to preseve and relocate two, large, mature Holly Trees due to the approved relocation of the accessory barn as shown on the December 12, 2012 property survey and the Proposed Building Relocation — Sheet Al" dated 1/21/2020. They have been destroyed. When asked, the Applicant said that they were "too expensive" to relocate. In light of the improvements underway, the scope of the proposed plan, and the significant investment, using "cost" as a reason to violate the Commission's decision is not credible. The majestic size and height of the Holly trees (as tall as the barn) played an important role in blocking winds and protecting the historic Willow tree. Their destruction put the historic Willow in jeopardy. +.2' 1.rIL °1A.7 44TREE �fE01W. p Ellen McNeilly 3 Historic Willow Tree As recent as this month, attempts to remove the Historic Willow tree, prompted notification and a site visit from both the Town Code Enforcement department and the Town Attorney's office. The current proposed plan Sheet A-4 dated 7/23/2020 removes the existing Willow tree and proposes a "new Willow tree", providing no details as,to type or size, but rather, an unrealistic illustration of a very mature, healthy Willow tree canopy. WILLOW STF EET e�.4,r _nlas za�o E 65.91' " ; q 1 sa?a >� ml iPN 10 The Johnson letter as noted in the 2014 Commission's Certificate of Appropriateness is not readily available in order to evaluate if any steps were taken to protect the Willow tree. At my request, Mr. Jonathan Shipman of Shamrock Tree Company, a Board Certified Master Arborist on the North Fork, made a site inspection in September 2020 of the Willow Tree and concluded that: it is alive and continues to show new growth ... I do not feel the tree is hazardous ... With proper maintenance, a new crown can regrow allowing this historic tree to thrive.". Even with damage due to the recent storm, the preservation of the Willow tree is possible. The recent cutting of branches to remove it entirely, and the assumption of its removal, as shown on the proposed plan is a violation and unacceptable. Environmental Quality Impact The Historic Preservation Commission application dated 7/15/2020 indicates that required additional approvals include the Zoning Board of Appeals; that is certainly true. However, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services is left blank. I am not well versed in Code Compliance as it relates to environmental review to know if the proposed plan requires additional approvals. However, based on the determination letter by the Suffolk county Department of Health Services dated November 8, 2004 in response to the ZBA# 5218 Lot Subdivision, it provided for two conditions: (a) ... recommended that the well on Lot 2 [subject site 95 Navy Street] be moved to a more optimum location"; and (b) "A covenant shall be provide ... and each lot is limited to a single-family residence only with accessory Ellen McNeilly 4 - r uses as may be approved by the Town of Southold." The suggestion is that the subject site should be fruther burdened by the impacts of additional habitable building areas. The proposed plan seeks the enlargement of the single family residence, adding a bedroom and a half-bath, and the conversion of the accessory barn to habitable living area, including a kitchen, full bath and bedroom. The enlargement of the accessory shed and conversion to a pool/cabana-may also include a bathroom and associated plumbing which requires Suffolk County Dept. Health approval, and then there is the pool itself and its water management and treatment (no details shown on proposed plans). Visual site inspection and recent inquiries by sanitary system professionals has verified that infrastructure work has already been completed. Is there a permit for this current work? Does it reflect the.proposed plan yet to be approved or denied? Historic Integrity and Character Dismissed The architectural treatment to the existing buildings reflects a modernist approach not consistent with the preservation goals of the Commission, the Town and the community who are guided by the profile, use, and character of the original structures and its place within a historic district. ¢' Single Family Residence Enlargement: The double height, voluminous space of the "summer dining" with its tower effect is a modern approach that pushes the enlargement to the extreme. Accessory Barn to Accessory Apartment: The entire "adaptive re-use" of the all the architectual elements of the structure is thoroughly against all historic building and historic district goals and principles. Furthermore, the visual impact is significant and evident from all angles — adjacent neighbors, Willow Street and Navy Street frontage. - -- -- -- �A SOJ NERSTYEY 97r7EWtG .,. mtiwsr n E tnn�ovrs E a Ellen McNeilly 5 `t Accessory Shed Enlargement to Pool/Cabana: Again, the change of use and u enlargement of the 180 -+ sf shed alters the building's envelope to be unrecognizable as a shed and generates concerns regarding sanitary systems requires additional approvals. Comment is limited as no plan nor fagade details are == -provided_for review. Proposed Plan: Change of Use Impacts All Architectural Elements Every element of the the proposed plan requires approval by the Zoning Board of Appeals, as it increases the scope of the existing non-conformance of the subject site and contains multiple variance.requests represented by the use change; front and rear yard requirements, lot coverage, floor area increases in multiple structures. The determination by the Zoning Board will significantly impact the proposed architectural treatment of the barn and shed. The change of use inherently triggers both desires of the occupant and building code requirements for light and air among other issues that require changes in the fagade and fenestration treatment as well as the roof line (plumbing vent stacks) Therefore, the Historic Preservation Commission should reserve review and judgement on the accessory shed and barn structures, as it is not guaranteed that the change of use will be approved, as there is no justification for it. If change of use is denied, a full restoration of the accessory barn and shed structures can be a proposed plan that is deemed appropriate. Thank you very much for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, Ellen McNeilly Enclosure Appendix Ellen McNeilly 6 Gary R. O'Connor—Architect 8 Coryell Street, Lambertville,New Jersey 08530,609-397-3635 March 22, 2021 / Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals REMVED 53095 Main Road —7�� P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 MAR 2 2 2021 Re: Appeal No. 7467 and Appeal No. 7468SE Zoning Board Of Appeals Property owned by Vincent Bertault("Applicant") 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 Ladies and Gentlemen: I am the architect for the Applicant and submit this letter in support of the applications and in response to the body of work presented by neighbor Ellen McNally. I think the overarching message here is that Ms. McNally, as she states in her first paragraph has been an active member of the Orient Community for over 30 years. I would rephrase this to be Over Active when it comes to her obsession with Mr. Bertault and his property. Ms. McNally apparently wants to control how another individual uses their own property directing where she feels elements of the program should reside and govern how one chooses to improve their property. As evidence of obsession is the how one combs thru every possible record and detail, photographing every move Mr. Bertault makes on his property not to mention a handful of times this individual has called on the Building Department to investigate and stop work for the Department of Buildings to come out and find no wrongdoing. Ms.McNally is making false accusations that testimony given to the Board in 2014 was disingenuous and part of a larger plot to mislead the Board. Our statements regarding barn use were true in the time and place where Vincent was with the property, but time and circumstance change, both individually and environmentally, causing plans to evolve and change which Ms. Ellen has no understanding or concern about,yet she has a conspiracy theory about a larger nefarious plot to ruin her community. If anything, Mr. Bertault has taken the time since getting the Barn relocation approval to figure out his needs over a period of time and then expressed this plan for his property and is now seeking the appropriate approvals withing the prescribed code and approval process which unfortunately leaves the application open to every voice and opinion trying to direct a Board how they should respond. Hopefully,the Board sees the obsessiveness of this individual and takes this false and misleading narrative with a grain of salt. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, AWZAI 01 Gary R. O'Connor,AIA Architect cc: Mr.Vincent Bertault, Property Owner Mr. Eric Bressler, Esq. Is Ellen McNeilly PO Box 314 Orient NY 11957 631-323-3989 eimcneilly(cDearthlink.net 117124 October 20, 2020 '""� Historic Preservation Commission Edward Webb, Chairman Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 - P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Application Dated 7/15/2020 95 Navy Street, Orient NY A SCTM # 1000-26-1-12.2 J Supplemental Submission Dear Chairman Webb and Board Members: The following serves as a supplemental submission to the letter and materials dated September 26, 2020 providing key documents to support my position on the above application. As of today, the second amended application that was provided solely in hard copy by the applicant has yet to be made available for public view.' Prior to the. public hearing on Oct. 22nd, I hope to be able to review what will be discussed and modify any comments made below I strongly urge the Commission to rely on the 2014 decision to inform the review of the current application, as the same concerns relating to architectural appropriateness and restoration as well as the preservation of historic landscape features are at the heart of this amended application. 1 Public Records request was made on Oct 1, 2020 for the following and to date, have not been provided: BUILDING DEPT:Building Permits Issued:#39186-Z(9/15/2014);#41328-Z(1/30/2017);#44198-Z(9/23/2019)and subsequent permits issued as result of any approvals by HPC and ZBA of current applications under review.;Copy of Johnson Tree Co. letter dated July 30,2014 as part of HPC Cert.of Approp.June 18 2014; If applicable-Notice of Disapproval of Amended Plan under current review at HPC dated 9-15-2020; Certificate of Occupancy subsequent to current dated June 15,2005-CO nbr Z-30982. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Copy of covenant referred to in SC Dept Health Envir.Quality letter dated Nov 18, 2004 associated with ZBA#5218; Any permits and/or code violations relating to environmental quality, particularly sanitary systems,given that infrastructure work has been performed at the subject site. CODE ENFORCEMENT: Online"Town Code Complaint Form"notification made March 12,2020, but received no reply nor action;All Code Enforcement Reports:(1)specifically relating to 2014 HPC Cert.Appropriateness on or about 9-11-2020; (2)Code violation reports since 2005. Ellen McNeilly 1 The Applicant's disregard to the directives in the 2014 decision and the strength of the Commission's authority matter greatly to the community and its trust in the Town's advocacy for the people they serve. Simply put, non-compliance "bad" behavior should not be rewarded. Architectual Integrity and Significance WHEREAS, the proposed n location of the historic barn and stud,according to the plans submitted,will result in the structures being restored and preserved as is.and The single-family house, the accessory shed and the accessory barn can all be viewed from either Navy Street or Willow Street and therefore are.the Commission's concern. Single Family House: As has been pointed out by the n _T Commission, the enlargement expressed by the tower element with cupola for a dining area shows little historical reference or inspiration. The Applicant's priority for a first floor bedroom is achieved without this unnecessary double height "dining room". Accessory Shed: Although the recently adopted Town Code s "� may allow for a change of use to a pool-cabana with other J enhancements, the existing 180-+ square foot shed is sufficient for that purpose. The proposed enlargement alters the building envelope making it unrecognizable as as a historic, accessory shed. Again, I urge that the Commission should stand firm to its 2014 decision that the accessory "...structures be restored and preserved as is." r .x Accessory Barn: It is clear that the Applicant's desire is to convert the Accessory Barn to an accessory apartment with the anticipation that the building would undergo an extensive renovation, not restoration. Since 2014, the Applicant has subjected'the Accessory Barn to a level of self-created disrepair. The long delay in restoring the roof framing and cover and the unfinished restoration puts the building in further jeopardy of being lost. Whether or not the ZBA will permit a change of use, I urge the Commission to re- state its directive to restore the existing structure. The fenestration system of the existing Barn provides ample opportunity to satisfy any use. Historic character will be lost if continued neglect leads to a future request for a dramatically different architectural treatment, rendering it essentially a new building. Ellen McNeilly 2 Landscape Features Holly Trees Destroyed — Need Replacement ��G WHEREAS, the applicant has agreed to make a good faith effort to preserve the property's existing trees and shrubs(particularly the holly trees)during the relocation process,and No "good faith effort" was made to preseve and relocate two, large, mature Holly Trees due to the approved relocation of the accessory barn as directed in the 2014 decision. 'I urge the Commission to require a modification of the amended a plans to show Holly tree replacements on the subject site, J specifying a mature size, planting plan, and a timeline for TN I 14 planting. Willow Tree to be Preserved WHEREAS, a letter was submitted to the Landmarks Preservation Commission on July 30, 2014,by N ichael Johnson,of Johnsen Tree Co.,Orient,outlining how to protect the willow tree adjacent to the proms location of the barn structure.The letter will be part of the applicant's final building permit application and,it appears that the project.r+equires no further review, The amended plans note that the mature, historic Willow tree as 'Existing Willow Tree Trunk" suggesting the tree is dead. It is well documented that the Applicant has neglected and made multiple attempts to destroy, not "preserve" as directed in the 2014 decision. Jonathan Shipman, a Certified Master Arborist, in the letter dated September 14, 2020 verifies that is "thriving". The Town's Code Enforcement has addressed the issue, but to date, the report has not been made available. I urge the Commission to require a modification of the amended plans to show an accurate depiction of the historic Willow Tree, and reiterate the important of preserving it. Any future use of the Accessory Barn may require some pruning, but not full-destruction. Ellen McNeilly 3 Evergreen Screening for Proposed Pool n►�� Evergreen screening along the property line should be required in order to block the view and buffer the noise associated with the proposed pool, particularly as it relates to Mr. Lewis' adjacent property. Thank you very much for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, Ellen McNeilly Resident and Owner: 205 Willow Street (Taxlot 26-1-4) 70 Vincent Street (Taxlot 26-1-5) Ellen McNeilly 4 Subject Site Navy Street Cottage and Willow Street Accessory Barn Accessory Shed Not Shown — Located in Interior of Lot tt -t .A- Single Family Cottage — 95 Navy Street _ p a f � win- Accessory Barn — Willow Street Frontage Fall 2020 Ellen McNeilly s � � . , _ � *► ..rte' x. $ . t _ < � 1 y. ' 'WY . ,� . Qi NNW A*_-,: ` / x% '� 3 k r' _.,It f 201 ',EES I POST HPC 2014 DECISION "RELOCATE 18" HOLLY"= DESTROYED; �77 44"WILLLOW=NEGLECTED BUT VIABLE %111,�OR EW-L TO 91ASWKW.1 Ire NW!Mf f7i STREET Nd a2. 1 PAWL 1 Z1 1.9 5TCCKA�E Ft. 44 z 4— 7. 27-1 Lot N MEES it E)(SIMC lf4I 1-� EEN S"� J FR" BARK mi Td wpop'o Ff 2�'_'IMAII It L 3f -r YA -Lqm 4 U ia STCpf A, RA)4F- U. Of4 N1YV STf4eCT /N\ max 6 (E.rut ia YERV CD PcRck4 I 5 ry rr, L 230 NA11E-k.5TfW NIM rM=t 12.2212 Subject Site Survey dated September 2012 Ellen McNeilly WILLOW STRUT AREA OF CONCERN -ELAZ N8512$'3C"E EL.5.2' REGARDING TREE REMOVAL. COMPLETED SANITARY INFRASTRUCTURE SHOWN 1(• BL4 [L4<'si� i! ////AAS\�`'/{V/ 4 .,EL.4. � 4— LOW Lstt - e r� sa-,acre tv it J-' � r�r r .i' ..• '�'SLR4`M' f ni;3tY'+t�t3kr I � K€xStt''4rEtt�fa (1 Lutewy s�"•t�* v Palo Ef{.r3AE. I .� v C� vtCrxi 0MA QL.•Y y F-1 v �i.w n 1 ssaca�nrax�c. �!!/. y zxsr�w +c usQace. � C P tia •�� ' f 00000� i ssorcass n sc A..�: '/ EL.4.6 S82 49 40 W 17.86' 182o'VV ``r —�ELS g NAVY STREET.._.. _. 'ROPOSED FILL SITE Source: HPC Amended Plan — 9-15-2020 Ellen McNeilly 55 %� }�•L��f��Y-; # �.t"8'`�C✓ T 4 YY+ �'q .5��"J' � r"F 4 1 2 4p � s}�a�,fzti.{�� K _rtSpt�Ys `t�. l E7 r Y?Ji`. t.,F�,{s� ye rl, p FA iR AM TI fl 71 • Ellen McNeilly PO Box 314 June 14, 2021 el i�- q, 0 ,5 Zoning oar o ,.yl down of 81-uth 'Id' b Town H-6f1'KkMM8610 sni4 54375 Route 25 C pea�S P.O. Box 1179 70,n ng Board of AP tmn" J�,!.Fr -if ;4sodqqA #6 1&,:N a I,,3's' IS i1 01 pflovil I noiai3eb A8'K brise ,_-iql-, P, ro 0 ' bl f2e M A API ofi�r6tiohr. �-7-4,67-�'-911)469-S _P� nG all s V1 S ..it. "JI I?-- t , S ; ). _qpilcpf7T0y6J91q ri n SCTM # 1000-26-1-12.2 bOlWixw ns, 9d enot, T f lb!uodz- -j"'.f 4-,-1 ki—, n A:n`- C,Al ov-01-j SUDOW'diltal-SUbMission urnz, ber�nohe-,,;. nend 717 kgocaoe ' s1 ' adris De; brs. iiAc. bluw oorib, _oua a- on:;6srr,-),4, )js Io sio-9r.. e The following serves as a supplemental submission to the letter and materials dated 'em ansiih'8186fi, iidlihv M a r6PY-b",following T 86fit! h�1661 mi"'m"6`Hfts 9,questa b-6 Q_r.,666dih qhlma (X_l _dappli proposedC .i cations -eoie- the Zoning Board.' A AD, To date,,,tAihe.-,Applicant,:hps notrespon.ded togn,&, u .I!cfcomjf..njenjs by� "'P i I SA i an Amended tRlan.�.: inc�'.e,"th.e-,140ard�,does��not, sw eta, bm1.issi_orj�da.W.'4o the Applicant prior to the next Board meeting, both the Board and the public is.subject-to time contraints, thereby limiting effective review of new materials. If a last minute subs fission 'adgtbj'the_Ap Iicafitj.str6mgIys0g dst -.dhatithg-6pardissue ijoAOon-'emen,'ttaiid!.,koeD-7#h,e3recbridi-dbenp.f,drfYfirth.er�cdm--rh-ebt.tr�ior,,tdfts.decision date. Pulili�t:ReCOid &i,'P" ibipmtdn NdW'-�Ahil ihthe�F'ijturei The public hearing on June 3, 2021 demonstrated the critical importance, particularly under the Covid19 requirements, of the Town's laserfische depository for public records that provide direct 24 hour access to all application materials that the public relies on (as is directed to in the public hearing legal notice) to provide the neighbors' perspective, a valuable contribution that should inform the Board's decision. An application's folder should also include a Public Comments subfolder, as it is done at the Planning Department. Lastly, as the post-Covidl 9 period arrives, the laserfische should not revert back to being thought of as only a historical archive for final resolutions, but an on-going resource that broadens public participation in decisions that impact their daily lives. 'Ellen McNeilly ZBA Area Applipation.#7467: Mult iple Waivers lncorriplete:File The Application File The Area Variance Application #7467 represents the appeal to the Building Department's"Notice.of Disapproval dated October 22, 2020, a response-jo:a permit application for "additions and alteration to an existing single family dWelling;tpopsti," of an in-gr6und swimming pool, construction of an accessory p tjhOusiq. a*a.i r), the.tinsAallation of afence". i OV Application#7467 file shows the latest CO dated 2005 for a "seasonal-residence heat", inconsistent with the Applicant's claim to living in the house for many yea'rs. The relocation-.0f,the accessory._shed.andr ybarn as per the 2014 HPC and ZBA decision appears complete. Advance-work on sanitary and non-sanitary-sanitaretaining walls and fencing is on going,and pre§. es Is p, a_ provals. Question: Before.th.e_Z5Aq. r6nts any.further approvals, shouldn't there be an updated , CO to Gonfirrh'tli w'6ik'rd`la e ihd'M 4-decisions has been performed properly and in accordance with the HPC and ZBA decisions, and codes that,r ect, Optent,and M7".7 expectation of accessory structures remaining as such. m It 2T! Obtaining,an,updated QO-,would.,,-b-e.-,"*a"-,bb-',Ph-i'411.6�h-� h;,-, own-', code.,_pnfq m-ept i s y H C _ e decision regarding the following: if - 14,d",6 6 O-Odif4th"aff _*Vbd t6 M k *6 _5 J�Wi.1- ,durihg thelfabs M I co# Wn" ft*rf V to TOPOS_ 6ed on C i6e ddl ture The letter N17 77 P 7 V ibat. iv AD z tv-,VC31 j U3 K -IJ r" 154 U 53,i jk. ia Ellen McNeillyH 2 1 IJ I* +,E -,.�iiy,'C x a z� �{xISO 1s T - _ Yrs x ti s YR " '-'_� ,sy {i T hSy T� 6 7 e.Sa.,9`4kY �J.3AW 5*6 Y t'"^oiin ,21"{'i�'[� �.. `rY4- •,y7v�«y.§ •^ ` IT r e �,.-'- ar.s" q .� `� "€•, f �1 r e.�,w[y �� r r"'�aYS r� ,i'rFrC'.K'`},t 'd" _ t ,p ¢ r ''i r^v '9 "Y' pk/s a �„ •" /t�.aydr Vis, wra .�'€ _'3 4.. �� s /, `.a f} �; �' t F,C s 'c� ��5t• - � svY .3� ME �'' s� �,' x `. 'r a,,,r' _i s . y rf r• y4 .r3 w"' to 1 , ,'r,'v P. wy„ek'.} a sn,,,c,;�3r i. " s ;.c"r'3°pwC aa�y a, ••- ��.sFS 4 ;V11"', s 'X•-#�.1 y+'` .a , w y . '�i� #' ^ +r. `e•�'. 4 �r t'-, "-, Y �;. ra��a`Y � ��r �-�a-P�z �r�F'��F" �IYrF i 9r.' . _. •• ., r,..> 5 . ��. ..f�.to ��.,u 'i. �1.."4-- e�:��+� e 3 i �. ,�-- 't s +✓ .,er - -•�� J.f �� tip-��"i �+r,�*�`' 'y,�",#S• # ,� � e • e e 1 Question: Is there an approved permit to undertake.the.fencing and retaining wall pp p 9, 9 construction, and how does this work relate to th6&ainage and sanitary plan? The Applicant claims the Drainage Plan (12-14=2020) is`approved,_yet there is no stamped plan in the file. As regards the Sanitary Plan (1.2 14-2020);:"the Suffolk County Dept Health Services (SCDHS) has issued:a "rejection letter" dated June,2, 2021 that requires a water y anal sis, additional documentation and a ZBA approval.. The SCDHS gives{deference to the 2BA, es it recognizes its authority and significant land use and environmental qualitytimpacts inherent in ZBA decisions to,provide relief z fi �4for a�ustifable `'hardship" ::Therefore kt is the obligation of the ZBA°to require a :a r ; �complete, verifi ble, accurate application file;and to consider the inereased4densifv `:` `/(enlarged of two accessory buildings;to residential and`—': i6�roria I ; }4 _ �use) of this proposetl;plan and the cunirnul"alive impact,of pnorvariances:o'pm ;adjacent.. iresidents and the community at�large i . . t F a 4Evergreen,Screen4ng BeyondYfhe N4ew In Ground Swimming Pool :'1;J'1inly r support far thepe"cted Board`contlition'to provide evergreen screening{asst mg4 ' n WN ysxc, io Uy ) S% � speifieda minii`nurtli hetght) to riitrgatevisual and noise irripactson neighborsih 5raddtron, since the Applicant has no qualms iii destroying historic, rrmaturetre (oin tine rsubJaect property, along propeft"',Imes to ake Way for retaining walls; ang mora � > " s �rieighboririg'properties}�, I think it necessary forxthe ZBA to look beyond'th s Yb swimmingzpool area and e�quire newt, equivalent )antings rn respo R. to the destruction tha# has'already taken place ,;xv,+rt ,�< x<G r ,. .. L .1 Fp, .44 Lot Coverage: Verification by the Board must be made as the current prapQsed prolan does not include various hardscapes (defined by the Code's definition of t3uilirgtea} _ .currently being constructed and expected to be installed at the subject site. The Plans lack details or a lot coverage diagram to quantify the true lot coverage. The areas are excluded from the lot coverage`calculation ar'e':the swimming p°ool and "garden pool' surrounds, patios, above ground walls and the most controversal parking ramp associated with the Application #7468SE. The corrected lot coverage calcufatfon-is expected to exceed the 20% lot coverage requirement, triggering yet another variance waiver request. ZBA Application #7468-SE: Accessory Barn to Accessory Apartment The Orient community oppositt'on aril the 2014 HPC antl ZBA approval #6729 to relocate two accessory structures based on the questionable "sanitary cover hardship" on the subject site is in the record. The barn height and safety concerns was an issue then, and is even more of a concern now. Perhaps it wasn't fully appreciated since the approved plans dated 10/18/2013 did not properly show the 8'-6" elevation and the significant slope that is claimed to be supported by FEMA requirements.The full 1 See Appendix for photos 'Ellen McNeilly d 4 . consequence of ithe 2014 decisions is now on.-.display and.to.great-,disappointment,by, the community%,, FEMA'-Requirements ,,Apces.t.o.rv;Stru.c-tures-..--vsResidential..,Buildings,;�,.,..-! As a witness to the Barn's two-stage foundation --- the first reflecting a lower supporting base,.'apor;ppriato,for,lgn.�qcc-i)s�s.o,'r-t-ystructur.oi-g-nd;.,thO--,sleco,nid,---,phase:that,addodi�the,-ie. m.e.n 'stio 441 e . nit, hetherAhe--"F.EMA e height,jo,i'aldhii3vo,�th-ei8�.':-�6!�,-�spenrtoday;,�-,--�F.I'il'q.0 M requir was aTespon 0 to'an application-Fora pro Ppsed:.iacO.',Ossor.y...::aparit-mon,t ciompare0do,'a the current-Peftnited use,asitahf-accessory,.is-tructure.d. Sin ceAhelApplicEfn.t.-,,has,-,,Ooitm[i and continues to do wo.rk,,i-,nil;qditance,,..it.--is,important _that,,,thl e-8 - " )'07o' foundation is aligned with FEMA rules for accessory structures. If it is found that the additional foundatiowbeight, -,the I 219�,Y.-z ,,k, D9H Building Department should direct the Applicant to comply with the rules for accessory JI -Z 'tul i r IT X,3.'_:i I-I 3n. _'id Ste "J ki aj F P 6dd"0 idif-A,d i!i d(f Two;P6M;fi6-9 The proposed plan to provide two exterior parking spots on a asphalt, steep slope is , a "v?"ac, o5d uY 6 p",It a,616 f de M", 6,1 fl,p;;I ereasons -A ON6 `6.ifi,vil lh"� 6 ''''S ` 6f Ifap'OrOVUd" e-Z'BA4661d; ddi844`A613Ifda" 6 dtf of't tH 666 i�Wge it' 777-7 -preserve t--,present;; -n,dh- edti'� -o"J"'l-i" i "i -fil-Mst ii'c�- 11, -1 " . dir'- '-'-V-61' 1 9- T A- exi o'-th 616rffi&----Kolly,tre'ds:6n Ye 1fde§,"hdW- �de'8dst " eYLan'1alterrriat`ive A :A; I- provide par4c�rY &1NaVN exists t66 Applicant states that the Drainage Plan has been approved by the Town. If that is the W6H "I case, then another Town Department will have caused the Applicanf`CO46e0[hil,303_07, compliance with the HPC 2014 decision. 0 z)d- beei7 4W Furthermore,--`ditddtIy imp& ing,thy,prop6tyli 205,M1116 Street,i -§1'd&11O1W§P1i6It V) -to, e' 1:�hb,,db'obt-bb�U�b',g'ovbr--e'orbbI -Wat6f`ru d-�dff, - W slop 11' 66�h Mid 1116bids- A`��,IrBh J f6dfd rd door and crawl space. Who'is-responsi e,, Aidfob 1 As n6ibd 1'11156V' Q th"i is'18 66diaPRiWficrft-66A,64tib 6k'ddbs�h 6tit-drn triggering yet another v yaiver(s)ftrom,,theicode, without the benefit of Building p Departffidht-review'and*WHfib9bori, f the_ba`fnj's' 'sq'tja-re'.foote!gp,.49d,-'thb"'*rI 886d pp, -J, liva6fe;i 6`66116-01!ldions as preserl'ied-1 `ihe' l5N8&t:&6h1tdct.- Alternative,,-.-t9-jnter r Configuration toAchieve livable .-space -be,sefti Allowing .-space to si)an,.tw.o.IeveIs,w_ouId. ng a,dangerous,precedent. The 930 square foot footprint of the Barn is sufficient.to 6 accom mod'ate an'accessory apartment, n,thejfijr§t floor.; Given:the_alternatives,to.,pro,,vid,ing.all parking spaces A' elsewhere,-,-the-interior 9p.raqeand!w6rkshpp,§pacp, along-:-with a`reducedst4irWell, can See Appendix—Foundation and Barn Height Ellen McNeilly certainly.accommodate the plan's 302 square feet proposed-for the'sedond floor. Assuming compliance with first floor living, the Board must specify that,the : All � second floor storage/attic area be accessed only by a pull-down attic ladder. Anything mores than a.1adder will invite.,expansion'of'livable-area to thg-second-floor. -` especially since the Barn roof has been altered, anticipating livable second floor space. An annual inspection-and r.:enewal:.of the CO by the.BuildingDepartment is required-for this`conversion. I'have.little confidence thatthe�either the,Applicant or the=Buildrng Department will diligently comply: :Moreover'.given'a!recent-le'tter•,bythe Applicant's ••::},. attorney that is-veryinaccurate and'actsto intimidate_.,and�-threaten lawsuit,.the", , . communitywould .hdstiatesto make.inquiries=fo'confirm compliance: HPC Jurisdiction:, NewrWindow;-Doors,-Fa ade, and Fencl g. . . r The Application 7468-SE materials do not include plans of the existing accessory,barn ,. structure to compare with the proposed conversion plan. In the HPC files, the existing= Barn plans dated 7/23/2020 are available. Again,.-,it is important that any,,, gal work at, the Barn should not be accepted or considered "as built" seeking legalization. nf When comparing the existing to tte'proposed, it is.Iabundantlycleathat,cangres to the Barn requires review and approval by HPC. This is particularly evident'at the Willow;Street fro_ tagq1f..Tetng.mJnutes were a*lii ple,m the,HPC Iasemsch�e�fpldpr,, to would be detailed discussions about windpw;antl doordeslgn:andF,specification (tocluding vendor sou:rces), f 99 de materials, paint color; etc etc Agah 4h,e 2014 HPC, 4 . decision expects "preserve and rq%grte as; abepecedented if HPd o . C , were to be by-passed and ZBA to exclude the condition for HPC approval. Recommendations Based on the history of the subject site, its current Certificate of Occupancy, the actions by the Zorlm, Board, Preservatign Cornrnission,,£$GD,epartment of Health Services, Town Code Enforcement, and a.review of the Zoning Board application rxiaterials to ; -it bears repeating that I strongly..urgeahe Zarnng$oard;to.,, - ----- •� Take nothing.for granted,and don't,give the Applicant the ben.eftt ofjthe,_doubt:; • Undertake rigorous,review of the a /�licatign s demand all nece'ssa and pertinent documents,, particularly as itelates tottfie accessory Barn foun.tlafron height. Consider the self-created°hardship end`°tfYe c inn ulativeim padts asaociated�With" prior variances and the proposed plan; determine if this third variance and z , wSa"N' t-from"the Specia!'Exemptioe�>r'equireme6ts ace.truly Warranted • Seriously consider the Alternatives'to the'proposed plan', of which th'ere'are-` many,-to-reduce negative impacts,-"a hd 1prOverit:dangerous,'unnecessary precedents. Ellen McNeilly 6 r•. • Keep in context the full record with public comment, recognizing the fact of the violations of the 2014 HPC decision go unnoticed and without consequences and the potential for Town Departments to be in conflict. • Fully understand the plans for fencing, retaining walls, and tree removal, as neighbors and the entire Orient community has watched the destruction of mature trees shared along the property lines that are either gone forever or pose a health/safety hazard and significant expense without clearly,assigned responsibility. • With any approvals, don't hesitate to use the Board's authority to apply strict conditions, deadlines, periodic proof of compliance and any other directive to protect neighbors and-the corrtmu i r�t�a gp. 3 A.a �A Thank you very mach for your consideration. ^^�� JV Respectfully submitted, Ellen McNeilly .Resident and Owner: 205 Willow Street (Taxlot 26-1-4) 70 Vincent Street (Taxlot 26-1-5) J 1. Ellen McNeilly ;� �.i`•. �..�� s � r 1��sr _. .bdi.. r;�rtee R��`• f�� ..?. ` I'`_ ._ «_.. S' � ......�� i 1� �/��/ ,s.7^ t,i;a.e 's\, :�.:*.:.t �(.,?.,. ,r1'.1/ .. t h. .' .. A.�,'! v4 ,,.:v k?E .. ld�;•u..'. .,t'..: 3.1., + �ti � .l.sf;.r.j��.{{� ry gw 9,-•(t+�� tfi� e_., f.�iz,�:^t f . r7 1? � ,.i��'� f ',i .it a�5i +ff rift i APPENDIX !r L ? i iDLXEi Ellen McNeilly 8 �.3t"X zi k'v4 �''i i: l� r #�s w '�5.^3.:ry �YT„�,� .tyy}:.� 7•.� .. ,� 5 3aa � r .t 3'e�e£ sa° wO`ar-k� + ks M r �.-TMcx Y�sti� t TIM fix' a r a �R u: t c a fit„# ,�, JJ § k r v^ c D �'s;v raT- ,e S v t _ t .x 'F 10 '� }Ws r¢ r k a en NOW ?v ' €^ ` �-. ; - J ^`la 4 I j •'` 4 ,541`i ,�t4�as. 215 ISP II Z%ig� N 'yV " fait 4WWR 3. +> MMsY� > 'RE M�.,�t'� ��;e� cis„ �.,+. ' ,k�+wzE' � w s HIR A � x :r � a r ti p`�.Y.,� • ` Y s�r�;t�: a�" a t:u� � Y'�, -� .r�,.1,,-s •� � 4E�' � fir` s'�{!,.:.�a. m,.;,.m NITI :y YY x,��""'`x � .'`v '��'t t � .�5'.� � a't.> x fit�F• �:'_.-. •va Destruction of Historic Mature Trees Ellen McNeilly ::' :- 9 I ��' fir, r'*"A,a,x .�Y#k Y,� A i' Y' °✓`^�� •-�S g .I +a.'4"'�.rs+. gm mak71, ' WMA S+ s Rx � ?"'+yah ,�.!��4��#'�>,w �� (�d•`,u' �' Y "�` y. V 0-19-3 a b t ' . r ,+'.K F{ *p T� � 'Xm"}rte�qr^ •uw pNxS. 4 Mme. ! _ _ .�� r �YS�-'� "' r�. :, wry„ �., `�"1"��ny Xu''y"a � p?k�? •�yc� ,� X Ta.��.Y�� " :.t is # is ' 4`p._ a��, '>r r�`� .ro �� y �«n+'� ,' a"r ��$�g'"irx•�F, • - � 1 n Ellen McNeilly AM PO Box 314 Orient NY 11957 631-323-3989 eimcneilly(a,)earthlink.net MEMORANDUM DATE: June 16, 2021 TO: Zoning Board of Appeals { �, Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 5437.5 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 ATTN: Chair Leslie Kanes Weisman and Board Members FROM: Ellen McNeilly, adjacent property owner at 205 Willow Street and 70 Vincent Street RE: ZBA Application 7467 & 7468SE Filed 12/21/2020 95 Navy Street,.Orient NY SCTM # 1000-26-1-12.2 Since the filing of these applications in December 2020, much work has'taken placeat the subject site. The following site photos should-bring the Board members up to date and provide clarification*as to the amount of fill expected to arrive at the site to significantly change the topography, particularly at the northern part of the site where the Barn sits atop of a 8'-6" foundation and assumes a steep ramp to Willow Street and the destruction of the historic Willow tree that is to be saved, preserved and cared for as directed by the 2014 HPG decision. I encourage Board members to re-visit the site and get a feel for the unsettling impact of the current work and proposed plan that, if approved, neighbors will have to endure for years to come. 1 Ellen McNeilly—6.14.2021 MIN ' a MMM � IU� v.', ,'#° � 7�' i ?y € � 'ac, .��WN a. �y�rky`�, MM4 '`�'yyiS. YZAr .`�""r s � & •.. .. a * f" ��'s �st 1 f•3. `�w.' §^�� 't'�a-(� ��,�bR �a s r �• xh sgAfi ai�a�1 � s 3 fx� � ar gg�o'€fi R ��.�t"i 4"'iu F'.��•�'�'? �`-k� �;'�: S •.ai` a�'= as .` •;. ?, £ ..w*` x ,�a , ar�-s r 6 � � 1 i x. H% & � �8�1. �44,`'.Y�• ,�.'.ks ,� � �" K a8""�' K* �. �.� ,�:s�� ax-�rAs is S �• a t .x° '�' g 'a �: t ,� s' rr",,�s'L" �-�a�e{s� u.° � � as A �` ..°5,'� � � � h'r'� :! ;.�:«r'`.;a alr�yb.�Sy., �' ,��*rF r` 'h°h:'.." '�,y��' 2 s� s•�. 'r* a,��°'� �z*+ $ sy 0 f�� 0.•t, r � �! CF�f� ,�'i"�. 0. F9 MIDI 'r k .w � �8a's�t•� �� aEj t � f Q�` � �� fro • ;'. �n d' 4 6 UA �l:�� .r `w"�,w.."�^r"••`.. y ' ,y'" Kb .. '�'5�3�"'#W,�4. °\ f'aaYi�P p t`'�4j>i'`3i\ a �d�. �:� �' � >,�� ..e,a;:�3 � 7�.� /'''��,.r 5'`'u wt .5 � 1 a.'��"t`'h•� �� °'�` �..,��"w��°k�Y i.�k.¢'',. .. - a .X..»».�....,.� .,!-,`�7' ._ i17Caa "�" '.�": "`...i�u�..��"i:.'•a ...?' f ir i�: �'�,a�"�-..�.� � �'. `,F;"."�•.:.. v I Ellen McNeilly PO Box 314 Orient NY 11957 631-323-3989 'eimtneilly@earthlink.net June 28, 2021 coo Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1178 Southold, NY 11971 Re:; ZBA Application 7467 & 7468SE 'Filed 12/21/2020. 95.NavyStreet, Orient NY -SCTM # 1000-26-1-12.2 Supplemental Submission # 2 Dear Chair Weisman and Board Members: The following serves as a supalemental submission #2 to the letter-and materials dated March-15, 2021, June 16, 2021, and June 21, 2021: All issues of concern detailed in these prior submissions remain current and provide a valuable contribution to the decision-making on the part of the ZBA for the above-applications. This submission speaks to the Applicant's "Revised Barn Plan" and Exhibits A, B, C. To be strongly considered by the ZBA are alternatives and protections identified below. Subject Site Status Subsequent to the ZBA's special meeting on June 17, 2021, the Applicant submitted a revised plan for the Barn's SE Application. Construction at the subject site continues, contrary to the ZBA's statement that the only valid permits reflect the 2014 HPC and ZBA decisions. It was noted that Town approval for the Drainage Plan' was only represented by an email, but no stamped plans were in the file. As regards the Sanitary Plan, the Suffulk County Dept. Health Services awaits,the ZBA decision before issuing any approvals. To date, the Building Department states there are valid permits to allow construction. Given that the Drainage and Sanitary Plans are practically the same, we assume that the Applicant undertakes the workscope of both, regardless of SCDHS June 2, 2021 rejection letter and final ZBA approval. Advance work by the Applicant appears to be the approach that puts all agencies, including HPC, in a challenging position. 1 The Town approval of the Drainage Plan conflicts with the HPC 2014 decision regarding the preservation of the historic Willow Tree,as the"asphalt driveway"requires tree destruction and additional HPC approvals as per the available LPC Handbook(Draft 2008)regulated activities. What components of the plan are approved? Ellen McNeilly 1 7 i6 •� Applicants Revised Plan and Exhibits A, B, C71. Exhibit A (2014 Drawing A-3), representing the 2014 approved relocation of the Barn "as-is" with the rear roof height at 17'-11" and the front (facing Willow Street) roof line at 18'- 9", including the note "6/11/2014 — Per Owner Request, Will Tree To Remain" was not adhered to. The Applicant chose to reconstruct the Barn roof and modify the building height to be a single roof line at 19' — 7" as shown in the intial submission Drawing A-3 dated 12-15-20. No revised elevation plan provided with last submission. Again, the Applicant's advance work, presumptions of full approvals (i.e variance to extend living space to second floor) results in an "as built" unapproved condition. The Applicant's lawyer is incorrect to say the SE Application is according to "Code". With the revised interior layout, does the ZBA simply accept the unecessary"as-built" condition building height) granting yet another waiver, negating the HPC "as-is" directive creating a dangerous precedent and mixed messages for future applicants? And does the HPC just defer, reliquishing their input? Exhibit S — Revised Drawing A-2 Interior Layout provides for the living area on a single floor; however, the grand staircase to the full height "storage area" at the second floor remains. If the ZBA seeks to uphold the intent and the necessary limitations of the Special Exception provision for accessory apartments then there must be a specific condition that requires only a pull down ladder to the second floor. Given this Applicant's track record and the lack of confidence in the Building Dept. to take action, if the staircase remains as shown, the Applicant's dream becomes reality. Exhibit C — (Drawing A-1) Site Plan shows the revised parking spaces for two of the three vehicles and continues to show the destruction of the historic Willow tree. Proposed "replacement" is unacceptable and unachievable. • -a``.c e31F it � s t Public comment and specifically concerns from adjacent neighbors (in the past and now) about the negative impacts of an asphalt steep slope toward Willow Street solely to provide access to the Barn's ' m = interior parking space, necessitating destroying the Willow Tree, was loud and clear. There are Alternatives to satisfy parking space requirements! Ellen McNeilly 2 p 1\ Alternative 1 (PREFERRED): Relocate interior garage parking space to Navy Street at the southeast corner of the property. Driveway slope no longer necessary. Interior living space increased, if desired. The Barn frontage (21'-6") at Willow Street receives the new fill with landscape elements. Doors (Walk-Thru,Sliding and Large Swing) can remain functional or be made fixed in place. Willow Tree remains and acts to buffer, shield, the unhistoric Barn structure, now so out of place. Alternative 2: Interior parking space remains, ramp designed for safe single car entry, no full frontage asphalt driveway. Large, 8 foot wide Swing Door fixed in place and terraced or landscape feature installed in a way that preserves the Willow Tree. Again, interior living space increased if desired, as current layout is illogical. In sum, the preferred parkinq configuration is represented by street level exterior parking spaces at: (1) NW corner of property at Willow Street. (2) SE Corner at Navy Street, (3) SW corner at Navy Street. HPC Jurisdiction and Approvals Based on the LPC Handbook available on HPC website page and discussions and decisions made on numerious applications within the Village of Orient Historic District, it is abundantly clear that the Applicant cannot proceed with the exterior fagade, door, fenestration treatment of the Barn nor the "front yard" driveway or parking areas as well as the Drainage and Sanitary Plan's "retaining walls exceeding 18" in height". Thank you very much for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, Ellen McNeilly Resident and Owner: 205 Willow Street (Taxlot 26-1-4) 70 Vincent Street (Taxlot 26-1-5) Ellen McNeilly 3 v Ellen McNeilly PO Box 314 Orient NY 11957 631-323-3989 ejmcneillyAearthlink.net OCTOBER 4, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals OCT Q Town of Southold Q�1 Town Hall Annex Building Zoning f30ard oro , 54375 Route 25 'Pea►s P.O. Box 1179 ---- ; Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA Application 7467 & 7468SE Filed 12/21/2020 95 Navy Street, Orient NY SCTM # 1000-26-1-12.2 Supplemental Submission#3 Dear Chair Weisman and Board Members: The following serves as a supplemental submission # 3 to the letter and materials dated March 15, 2021, June 16, 2021, June 21, 2021, and June 28, 2021, all of which provided a very detailed review and analysis with supporting documentation that highlighted key issues the ZBA must address. SUlUll1191ARY COMMENTS At Last ! The current Stop Work Order dated August 24, 2021 speaks volumes as to the Applicant's actions. It also represents "too little, too late" and "better late than never" inspection and enforcement responsibilities by the Building Department in identifying compliance issues associated with the 2014 HPC and ZBA decisions, and advance work without approvals or permits.1 Clearly, the record shows the oversight and inaction of the Building Department (July & Sept 2017) to issue a Stop Work Order early on. Now, it is the ZBA and HPC that must make the determination --- a direct violation of the 2014 ZBA and HPC decisions to be corrected, or yet another illegal "as-built" condition that the Applicant expects to be legalized? 'SEE APPENDIX-Southold Town Code Enforcement and Building Dept Inspection records (website generated, direct emails to Town officials, site inspections)demonstrate the continuous notification of violations by the Applicant. Enclosed herein, one of the earliest occurs in 2015, represented by an email from Bill Gesell (adjacent owner)to Peter Doherty(Southold Town). Bldg Dept Chronology clearly shows their oversight and inaction-See July and Sept 2017 Ellen McNeilly 1 y The HPC letter dated September 1, 2021 addressed to the ZBA fails to mention the Applicant's agreements and then non-compliance with the 2014 HPC decision (see sections below) as it relates to the existing trees on the subject property, particularly the historic Willow tree. Attempts to destroy the Willow tree directly or by neglect as well as the wholesale removal of mature trees from the property is well documented, but is consistently overlooked. n ` U WHEREAS, the applicant has agreed to make a good faith effort to preserve the property's existing trees and shrubs(particularly the holly trees)during the relocation process,and WHEREAS, a letter was submitted to the Landmarks Preservation Commission on July 30, 2014,by Michael Johnson,of Johnson Tree Co.,Orient,outlining how to protect the willow tree adjacent to the proposed location of the barn structure.The letter will be part of the applicant's final building permit application and,it appears that the project requires no further review, Consequences for Non-Compliance: With the loss of confidence with the Building Department Enforcement, the ZBA and HPC has a responsibility to recognize the Applicant's non-compliance of prior decisions, especially when the Applicant comes back for more and is submitting multiple special permit applications over time for the same subject property. Moreover, the ZBA and HPC should use their authority by assigning enforceable conditions that ensure future compliance. The ZBA and HPC are not the direct enforcement agencies; however, the decisions with specific conditions "give teeth" to the enforcement efforts. "Ask for Forgiveness, Not permission" I "Legalizing the Illegal" : An unacceptable approach for any Applicant and should not be tolerated by any agency. RECOMMENDATIONS TOWARDS RESOLUTION ZBA Application # 7467 2 Based on the C of A from the HPC (4.5.2021) and the deliberations at the prior ZBA hearing, it would appear that an approval is expected for#7467. 2 ZBA Application 7467—Plans Digital filename: "95 Navy St ZBA Area Variance with Approved HPC Updates" A-1 Site Plan dated 12.15.2020 A-2,A-3, A-4—VOIDED A-5 dated 12.15.2020 Photos A-6 dated Revised 3.11.2021 Proposed Plans A-7 dated Revised 3.11.2021 Exterior Elevations Ellen McNeilly 2 - n Plans: 1. No plans should be stamped "final approved" unless they are made accurate and align with the approved proposed plan. A-1 Site Plan dated 12.15.2020 is inaccurate. It shows a 4' picket fence where a cement wall now stands and shows the destruction of the historic Willow tree, a violation of the 2014 HPC decision. The proposed "replacement" is unacceptable and unachievable given the maturity of the Willow tree, nearby drainage and sanitary components and its current location providing a visual buffer to what has become a "unhistoric" barn on a raised platform. 2. Applicable to both Applications are the Drainage and Sanitary Plans3, both of which show unacceptable and unapproved elements such as the asphalt driveway which assumes a two-car situation and the destruction of the historic Willow tree. Conditions to Apply: • Specify that ZBA and HPC approved plans take precedent over any inconsistent elements found in the Drainage, Sanitary, or other supporting plans relevant to the proposed development. Alternatively, require all related developments plans to align with approved plans and conditions. • Beyond the standard "evergreen screening" to buffer the noise and visuals of the .proposed pool, an enhanced detailed planting plan with enforceable deadlines should be required for the entire property and specific preservation efforts required to preseve the historic Willow tree. ZBA Application 7468SE 4 Plans: 1. No plans should be stamped "final approved unless they are made accurate and align with the approved proposed plan. 3 Applicable to both Applications are: Drainage Plan dated 12.14.2020 Sanitary Plan—P-1 dated Revised 4.2.2021 SCHS Comments Sanitary Plan—P-2 dated 12.14.2020 4 ZBA Application 7468SE Plans: "Revised Barn Plan" as per Bressler letter dated June 11, 2021 Exhibit A—A-3 dated 6.11.2014 Existing [Non-Complying Roof Line] Exhibit B—A-2 Revised dated 6.10.2021 Proposed Plan Exhibit C—A-1 Revised dated 6.10.2021 Site Plan Ellen McNeilly 3 As noted above, the Site Plan drawing shows the destruction of the historic Willow Tree and a proposed replacement and other inaccurate elements. The /� Site Plan shown as Exhibit C —A-1 Revised dated 6.10.2021 Site Plan is � } \ unacceptable and requires revision. 2. Verification of flood permits, FEMA regulations must be made to determine the foundation height associated with the 2014 "as-is" relocation of the accessory Barn.5 Modified Barn Roof Line and Height 1. Exhibit A (Drawing A-3 dated 6.11.2014), representing the 2014 approved relocation of the Barn "as-is" with the rear roof height at 17'-11" and the front (facing Willow Street) roof line at 18'- 9", including the note "6/11/2014 — Per Owner Request, Will Tree To Remain" was not adhered to. The Applicant chose to reconstruct the Barn roof and modify the building height to be a single roof line at 19' — 7" as shown in the intial submission Drawing A-3 dated 12-15-20. 2. The ZBA has the authority and should require that the Barn roof be returned to its "as-is" condition. Legalizing the illegal in this case signals the wrong message to future applicants. However, if the ZBA and the HPC consider this as an "as-built" condition to be legalized, then it must be balanced with a condition to restrict access to the second floor, ensuring that the "storage" area is not used as living area. Otherwise, where is the recognition and consequence for the Applicant's illegal action? 5 What needs to be taken into account here, and noted to the ZBA, is that the barn was initially moved to its current position AT GROUND LEVEL, and not set on a foundation, as it had been at its previous location in the center of the lot. It remained, roofless and foundation-less at the current location for some years until recently put on its initial concrete foundation at ground level,when sanitation and grading work commenced. See original plan, dated 10/18/13. Shortly thereafter, the foundation was raised an additional 4'. When asked by a neighbor why it had been raised, the response from the Applicant was that"FEMA made us do it". No permit for that action was posted, nor seems to have been granted. It was only in retrospect realized by concerned neighbors that this was done in anticipation of permission for an accessory apartment to be incorporated in the structure. Ellen McNeilly 4 1 \\\ f Second Floor "Storage Area" 1. Exhibit B — Revised Drawing A-2 Interior Layout provides for the living area on a single floor; however, the grand staircase to the full height "storage area" at the second floor remains. The ZBA should uphold the intent and the necessary limitations of the Special Exception provision for accessory apartments. Therefore, a specific condition that requires only a pull down ladder to the second floor should be applied. Parking Spaces 1. Exhibit C — (Drawing A-1) Site Plan shows the revised parking spaces for two of the three vehicles and continues to show the destruction of the historic Willow tree. As noted, the proposed "replacement" is unacceptable and unachievable. 2. Proposed Interior Parking Space triggers the need for an access ramp into the structure. This leads to the destruction of the historic Willow Tree, a hard surface ramp that exasberbates the water runoff towards my property at 205 Willow Street and traffic safety is reduced as vehicles back out onto the narrow and curved portion of Willow Street. To mitigate these negative impacts, there is an alternative. Necessary Design Changes and/or Conditions to Apply: The determination regarding the illegal modification of the roof line and the resulting increased height of the second floor must be paired with an interior design change to restrict access to the second floor "storage" area to prevent further illegal actions by the Applicant. Restrict Access to 2nd floor "storage" area by requiring a pull-down ladder, instead of the proposed grand staircase which would allow for easy access and enjoyment of the large, full height (if ZBA and HPC legalizes "as-built" illegal modified roof line and height) second floor. The proposed plan labels it "storage", but the temptation and the actual use will be living area for each two year period, not including the one day assigned to Town inspection. Ellen McNeilly 5 Parking Space Alternative: Relocate interior garage parking space to Navy Street at the southeast corner of the property. Driveway slope no longer necessary. Interior \ living space increased, if desired. The Barn frontage (21'-6") at Willow Street receives new fill material with terraced landscape elements. Doors (Walk-Thru,Sliding and Large Swing) can remain functional or be made fixed in place. Willow Tree remains and acts.to visual buffer, shield, the un-historic Barn structure, now so out of place. In sum, the preferred parking configuration is represented by street level exterior parking spaces at: (1) NW corner of property at Willow Street. (2) SE Corner at Navy Street, (3) SW corner at Navy Street. Thank you very much for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, s Ellen McNeilly Resident and Owner: 205 Willow Street (Taxlot 26-1-4) 70 Vincent Street (Taxlot 26-1-5) Enclosures Ellen McNeilly 6 y} I CY APPENDIX CODE ENFORCEMENT - EARLY NOTIFICATION 2015 EMAIL BILL GESELL (ADJACENT OWNER) TO PETER DOHERTY (SOUTHOLD TOWN) CHRONOLOGY OF BUILDING PERMIT & INSPECTION OVERSIGHT & INACTION Ellen McNeilly 7 From: billgesell1(cDamail.com Subject: BERTAULT #6729 A1A Date: April 2, 2015 at 1:03:38 PM EDT To: <PeterD0town.southold.ny.us> Peter, I have been in contact with Damon and he suggested I contact you with my concerns. I own the property located at 20 Vincent St., Orient. My property adjoins the Bertault property located at 95 Navy St. Yesterday my neighbor informed me that a tree service company was in the process of removing two holly trees. The holly trees and the willow tree, for which Willow street is named, were topics of discussion at several Zoning Board and Landmark Preservation meetings last year. Mr Bertault stated that he would preserve the willow tree and relocate the holly trees. The drawings used to get the building permit reflect this. Yesterday, my neighbor asked the tree service representative, who was in the process of removing the holly trees, why he was removing the trees. My neighbor was informed that Mr Bertault was provided with a quote for relocating the holly trees and Mr Bertault decided that this was to expensive and the trees should be removed. My concern is what will Mr Bertault do next. Doesn't he have an obligation to follow the plans the town approved? To be open with you I opposed Mr Bertaults request for a variance and relocation of barn for the following reasons. 1. 1 felt that relocating barn would change the historic character of Orient. The barn has been in its current location since late 1800. Over 50 Orient residents agreed with me and they signed a statement to this effect which I submitted to the Landmark Preservation Committee. Bottom line is that the Landmark Commission approved relocation so this issue is closed. 2. My property is a corner lot with limited access to street. Relocating barn and providing access to Mr Bertault's property from Willow St. will restrict vehicular access to my property. If Mr Bertault parks a car at the end of his driveway I will not have vehicular access my proper. Mr Bertault said he would not do this but only time will tell. 3. The latest drawing I obtained show that the relocated barn height will exceed code and will not comply with required side yard set back. The Zoning Board of Appeals did not address these issues. The ZBA only addressed the relocated barn setback from Willow St., which was the reason the Building Department originally rejected permit. I might point out that the plans approved by the ZBA are not the same plans used by the Landmark Preservation Commission. The major difference is the floor elevation of the relocated barn was raised from 7 to 8 ft. See Ellen McNeilly 8 attached for details. I had an architect review plans and she agreed with my concision that the maximum code height will be exceeded if foundation is raised to 8 ft. I request that you review plans and reach your own conclusions regarding height and side yard set back issues mentioned in 3 above. Please let me know what you conclude and what can be done to insure compliance with all applicable codes. I also do not understand why the Town feels a decision is valid when the information used by each group involved in the decision process is different. A Thanks for your attention to this matter. Bill Gesell 732-616-9005 Specifically. Drawings Drawings Approved by ZBA Presented to Historic Preservation Commission 1.Drawing A.l a.Revised 01/21/14 a.Revised 6111114 Dated]0/18/13 b.Relocated barn F.FLR b.Relocated barn F.F1,R EL.=7.0' EL.=8.0' c.Min.side yard setback to c.Same west:15' d.Min.side yard setback to d.Same east:Not shown.Measures approximately 18' e.Average natural elevation c.Same for relocated bam:4.6' (per Drawing AJ) 2 Drawing A3 a.Revised 1/21/14 a Revised 6/11/14 Dated 10/18/13 b.Height of front roof b.Same above ground floor 18'9" c.Height of foundation from c.Height of foundation from "raised"ground to first floor. "raised"ground to first floor. Not shown 1'$" 3.Max.Barn height in relocated position 21.15' 22.15' (see attachment 1) Ellen McNeilly 9 nIV\Q Attachment 1 1 Ref:#6729—Bertault Residence Accessory Building Relocation Calculation of Maximum Building Height for Relocated Barn A.Maximum barn height(from natural grade)on Drawing presented to Historic Landmark Commission [=18.75'(1)+8.0(4)'-4.6(2)']* 22.15' B.Maximum barn height on Drawings approved by ZBA [=18.75'(1)+7.0'(3)-4.6'(2)]* 21.15' *Numbers in brackets are shown below Information used to calculate maximum building height 1.Maximum Barn height from ground floor to front roof as shown on Drawing A.3 dated 10/18/13 (Revision 1/21/14 and 6/11/14) 18.75'(18'9") 2.Height of"natural grade"for footprint of Relocated barn as shown on Drawing A.1 dated 10/18/13 (Revision 1/21/14 and 6/11/14) 4.6' 3.Ground floor elevation shown on A.1 revised 1/21/14 7.0' 4.Ground floor elevation shown on A.1 revised 6/11/14 8.0' Note: Code specifies "Height of Accessory Buildings"is measured from the"natural grade adjacent to the building,before any alteration or fill....." Ellen McNeilly 10 FOIL REQUEST FILES — OCTOBER 8., 2020 Name Date modified Type Size c�t 95 NaW St 11/1512020 10,44 AM Adobe Acrobat D... 1 KB 39186-Z-Bertault 2014 plans-Barn Foundation 1.1/15/202010:43 AM Adobe Acrobat D ZJ 12 KB 20201008141452-Attorney Ltr-Oct 2020 FOIL 1018/2020 4408 PMt Adobe Acrobat D 47 KB 20201112090021-Stop Work-TEmp shed 11115/2020 2:55 PM Adobe Acrobat D 2,207 K3 9L 20201112090106-Complaint Running Water 11/15/2020 10-43 AM Adobe Acrobat D 269 KB 20201112090141-Complaint French Drains 11/15/,202010:43 AM Adobe Acrobat D... 446 KB 20201112090208-Investigation May 2016 1111512020 99:58 AM Adobe Acrobat D 193 KS 20201112090235-Jan 2015 Unsafe Barn Structure 11/15/202010:26 AM Adobe Acrobat D 1,468 KB 20201112090309-Investigation Oct 2016 11/15/2020 1027 AM Adobe Acrobat D 1386 KB 20201112091923-Bldg Permits 11/15/2020 10:28 AM Adobe Acrobat D 2,978 KB Bertault-95 Navy St 11/15/2020 10:29 AM Adobe Acrobat D 16,36.4 KB Ift 11/1 512020 1 0:26 AM Adobe Acrobat,D:.. - 1 K8 Z-3755 11/15!2020 10.44 AM Adobe Acrobat D 176 KB Z-30982 11/15/202010:26 AM Adobe Acrobat D 699 KB Z-30983 11/i 5/2020 10:26 AM Adobe Acrobat D 314 KB Z-31196 11/15/202010:45 AM Adobe Acrobat D 283 KS ZBA Variance 5218 11/15/202010:45 AM Adobe Acrobat D.., 8,975 KB Chronology of Events — As Per File Contents in Filename "2020111209123-Bldg Permits" 10/24/2013 Application for Building Permit, relocate Accessory Barn & shed. no change of use planned 9/15/2014 Permit#39186 granted (to expire 3/16/2016) 3/31/2015 Floodplain Development Permit Application filed X: relocationk Structure type: residential (1-4 Family X: other: relocation of accessory frame barn and shed 4/2/2015 Gessell letter: drawing shows barn height will exceed code >Plans ok'd by ZBA (rev 1/21/14) hgt: 21.15' >LPC ok'd by HPC (rev 6/11/14) 22.15' Ellen McNeilly 11 Plans show different elevation from natural grade 10/26/2015 Inspection: Elevation & Location Survey required before any framing approved by Bldg Dept. 11/16/2015 Project Architect Letter to DRallis: "Barn slab on grade lowered 18 inches, top of foundation wall elevation not needed, as flood vents to be installed" Note:Applicant decides not to do vents, hover does this impact FEMA and othernequirmments in rdadon to heigh t requirement?Z Rallis ok's foundation location (no comment on grade issues) 10/4/2016 Permit 39186 expires 1/30/2017 Permit 41328 to relocate barn and shed, which have already been moved. 7/11/2017 Inspector states "Contact Bldg. Dept., West elevation roof framing is incorrect (see photos)" 9/5/2017 Bldg Insp.: "Framing and Strapping OK" Note: Has not been redone on Vilest elevation 9/20/2019 Bertault pays fees for renewal of expired Bldg permit. 9/23/2019 Permit #44198 issued: Relocate existing barn building and shed as applied for per LPC Certificate of Appropriateness and ZBA approval ---with flood permit. Note: Does not address differences between ZBA and LPC/HPC plan information Ellen McNeilly 12 1 I l 10/15/2020 Building Relocation (which building not ID'd on Plan), i 0 Questions from Bldg Inspector: "What is new overall height?Amend drawings for elevation and overall height. What is finished grade?" 10/22/2020 Architect letter re: foundation detail—work to resume, protective barricade to protect construction area to be installed 10/22/2020 Proposed temporary barricade (at street verge?) (Vote:,Reference to modified floor elevation @8' Note: Reference to existing 'Willow tree trunk" which LPC>HPC indicated was to be saved, Ok condition confirmed by Master Arborist Jonathan Shipman in letter to Supervisor Russell, et. al. 90/30/2020 Building inspection Architect to certify pinning of new foundation to existing foundation and Finished floor elevation Storm water Management Plan is required if- (grade is to be raised)??????? Amend drawings for elevations and Overall heights. Last permit expired on 3/24/21 Ellen McNeilly 13 Timothy T Frost Bayhouse 1995 Village Lane Orient,New York 11957 zoning Board of Appeals 10 June 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building Southold, New York BY HAND/.DROPBOX Re: ZBA Application for 95.Navy Street in Orient Chairperson Weisman and Fellow Board Members: I am a.35-year resident of Orient Village and the owner of 1.995 and 2,190 Village Lane. Both properties are near the Applicant's property and my permanent.residence (1995 Village Lane) is Within the sightJin.e:of his.barn and.Willow Street frontage. I-am one who believes that property owners are entitled to make changes to their property provided such changes meet the requirements of the Town.Code. However, as site work on the Applicant's p.roperty_has recently`intonsified and disrupted the neighborhood, I have grown increasingly interested in.understartdipg the project. To do so I participated in the 3 Jane ZBA Public Hearing. I am deeply concerned by what.is proposed and, based on a subsequent initial review of the available HPC and ZBA digital files:on the Town's website, I am shockedi aril shocked-by: t.) the scale of what is proposed; it.) the.approvals that may have been given; and,.iii.)what i believe may be significant potential administrative and procedural inconsistencies and Irregularities by the Town. i will be following up with specific and detailed comments based on a more extensive review of available files, but I wanted to share some initial thoughts and concerns. I recognize that issues related.to HPC approval are not directly relevant to the current ZBA application; however, as-a starting point, for the record, i believe.they should be noted in relation to obtaining permits for work going forward. Frost Letter--Initial Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 10 June 2021 ® The HPC awarded a Certificate of Appropriateness (CoA)to the Applicant to move and restore the barn in 2014. The CoA was for "the proposed relocation of the historic barn and shed, according to the pians submitted, will result in the structures being restored as is...". Changes made to these approved drawings must be'approved by the HPG; however, during the 3 June Public Hearing, the architect and lawyer representing the Applicant seemed dismissive about the extent of changes being proposed in converting the barn to an.apartment, implying that additional review is unnecessary. Based on the elevations shown by the Applicant's architect at the June 31d meeting,.the changes are Not minimal, with the principal fagade's original sliding barn doors being relocate,d,.and, based on the incompleteness of the elevation, perhaps;eliminated altogether.The fact f.. of the matter is that the Applicant has already deviated from the approved HPC drawings of the barn..The West:elevation roofl-ine is different;with a straight saltbox- type profile instead of the original profile which combined a gable and lower sloped shed. ® The.approved WPC drawings show a gentle slope up to the.old barn doors on a restored.fa..gade facing Willow.Street.What is now being proposed'is an:asphalt-paved ratiip-at over-a 15%.grade.For some reason,the floor of this structure-was raised 6" higher than the elevation proposed for the house, even though-its original praposed:use was as a garage; t+vorkshop.and storage, not a residence.This anomalous condition is se lf;:created by the`Applicant and couid have been avoided if the barn had been set back furtherfrom the street;or not raised to the extent that it was..This parking ramp:will be.. gWtreewhose preseruationboth.ursightlyard.dan , Was sp6dfica{iy'mentioned.in the CoA, is-now shown as being removed to.remake way for . the n:ew park'ing.ramp. Finally, a new willow tree is proposed to be planted-over a dry well... which is.a recipe for disaster. The high masonry walls that are currently under construction were not submitted°for. review by the�HPC even thoughmails and fences are con'tponents that require review. If the current building permit,which was slipped through the Building Department without HPC-review is based on the grading plan, any wails or fences not indicated on this-plan would be subject to review by the HPC. In addition, according to"the plan filed into the`record.on_June 4t", it appears that there is a 4' vertical slat fence being placed: onto„p of,a wall-that is 4'4" above grade on an adjacent owner's side of the.wall.This would-create a wa l-of 8:4"which does not meet code. ® The.HPC has not reviewed or approved any alterations to the shed structure/future Pool Cabana. 2 Frost Letter--Initial Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 10 June 2021 V As stated previously, I will be following up with specific comments regarding the current ZBA applications based upon a comprehensive review of available ZBA and HPC digital files, as well as a continuing review of more.complete and updated digital files and;information, as such is and should be -- made available. Thank you for both your consideration of this matter and your service to.the Town and residents of Southold: Sincerely, /S/. Timothy T fro /ttf. cc: Scott:ARussell=-Town'Supervisor Bill Duffy.=Town Attorney Marielia Ostroski-Chairperson,.HPC 3 Fuentes, Kim From: Sonia Gesell <soniagesell12@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,June 14, 2021 9:11 PM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: [SPAM] -Vincent Bertault property at 9S Navy street June 11 , 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold JUN 1 52021 Town Hall Annex Building Southold, New York WAIV.B„,.0_- - am the property owner at 255 Navy Street, Orient. My property is adjacent to ZBA applicant Vincent Bertault at 95 Navy Street.This project began In 2014 when I believe ZBA and HPC approval was given to relocate and restore a historic barn and shed at the above location with stipulations which included the preservation of some holly trees and the iconic willow tree located on�said property. It is now 2021 and the barn has not been fully restored to the original style and approved use as a barn and boat storage,-the hollytrees are gone and the.iconic willow tree looks in, jeopardy. The.main unheated cottage on the property looks in disrepair. with a shipping `co.ntainer/dump�ster'next to my property for several years now. Work has recently begun on .a wall a-few-inches from my property-line-whose--height, function or finished appearance has-not been-made clear. In the process of digging a trench for this wall the roots of all the trees and bushes along my-property have been-damaged. I Stand,to'lose these-trees which provide privacy screening and shade to my property. There seems to be plans for an apartment in the barn, a pool and cabana, a major addition to the cottage, anew grading plan, a new septic system and a new water management installation. I am not sure what further impact this ambitious project will have on my property. Although I-am most interested in having Mr. Bertault complete the improvements to his. property, he as well as the surrounding neighbors deserve all regulatory agencies to provide coordination, clarity and consistency in granting further approvals. I am asking the zoning board's careful consideration in interpreting and enforcing the -laws and regulations meant to protect all property owners and the historic village of Orient. Subsequently, I would hope that Mr. Bertault would provide proof of good faith by complying with town regulations and by providing compensations to neighbors negatively affected by his proposed project. Sincerely, Sonia Gesell Fuentes, Kim From: Linda Rice me.com><lindacrice@ =�' ter, % , - .r r Sent: Saturday June 12 2021 2:10 PM ``J To: Fuentes, Kimj Subject: 95 Navy Street Orient 2021 • 5+. Linda Rice 425 King Street#15 ORIENT, N.Y. 11957 917-821-0535 lindacrice@mac.co.m Begin forwarded message: AM From: Linda Rice <lindacrice@me.com> Date:June 12, 2021 at 1:47:24 PM EDT To: kim.fuentes@town.southol.ny.us Subject: 95 Navy Street Orient Orient is a distinct neighborhood with a history of preservation and respect for size and appearance of its properties. 95 Navy Street has been an eyesore for at least 2 years. Highly visible piles of earth,tree debris,yard waste, trenches, and a front porch covered with items. The look of the property is similar to an unruly dump site. The condition of the property does not belong in any residential neighborhood. Linda Rice 425 King Street#15 ORIENT, N.Y. 11957 917-821-0535 lindacrice@mac.com ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. Thomas Ryckman&Pamela Wilson-Ryckman 1405 Village Lane RECEIVED P.O. Box 606 � Orient, NY U957 JUN/ 4�7 tryckman@stanford.edu;pamela622@mac.com .� 2025 415 730-1216;415 897-8994 Zoning goaF 6 0 of appeals June 12, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals RE:ZBA Application 7467&7468SE Town of Southold 95 Navy Street, Orient Town Annex Building P.O. Box it79 Southold, NY u971 Dear Chairwoman Weisman, and Board Members, We are recent home-owners in the center of the historic district in Orient;over the past winter,our plan to renovate our garage as an artist's studio received HPC and ZBA approval.We were tremendously impressed with the deliberate and careful process by which both HPC and ZBA treated our application:notices for community input were posted well.in advance,the public meetings were well advertised,interested neighbors were provided every opportunity to voice their opinions, or objections. The entire procedure proved transparent and equitable;we came away regarding it as an instructive :civics lesson and a model of local democracy. Fr0m many conversations with our neighbors,and new friends in Orient,several of whom border the property of the ZBA applicant at 95 Navy Street,and others, not bordering but residents in the Village vitally concerned with preserving the unique character of Orient Village,we have_come to the conclusion that somewhere during the protracted building project'at 95 Navy Street,such a fair and equitable process as we experienced last winter did not occur.We-believe this to be an oversight, largely explicable by the long time period over which the 95 Navy Street project has been conducted, but also perhaps by the simple fact that the owner appears to have taken the reins into his own hands,presenting the relevant agencies with a fait accompli. We strongly urge the ZBA to reach a decision regarding the applicant's request for an exemption from the Town Code that is compatible with the surroundings of the property, with the character of the neighborhood, and with the Village in general. Si nrPrply. Thomas Ryckman&Pamela Wilson-Ryckman Fuentes, Kim From: Patricia Cristol <patricia.cristol@icloud.com> Sent: Saturday,June 12, 2021 10:16 AM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: 95 Navy Street Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Hall ' A Leslie Weisman, Chair 6 Robert Lehnert,Jr. Eric Dantes Patricia Acampora Nicholas Planamento Kim Fuentes ^ Re: 95 Navy Street Background: The barn on this property was moved 7.years ago away from the house and very close to Willow Street. It was then left to rot,while the residence itself became more and more dilapidated,with derelict vehicles on the side of the house and junk on the front porch. When there's rain,the piles of dirt run off into the street, Which is now cracked.Work on the property has been sporadic over years. It has been a continuous eyesore. Currently: The barn has a giant trench around it,with even bigger piles of dirt everywhere, and seems to be extremely high off the ground. Now I understand that the owners plan to create an apartment in this barn.,.That's crazy. All the neighbors of this property have already been adversely impacted by this years-long mess, and the neighborhood environment will be further degraded by their plan.There's no room whatsoever for off-street'parking on either Willow or Navy.The barn is way too close to Willow Street and out of scale.There's no room to screen or buffer the barn on the Willow Street side. The existing trees and shrubs, including the willow tree for which the street is named, have all been torn up.And now there's no space left to create a buffer. This property has been a mess since 2014.While the-house and barn deteriorated,the site was repeatedly dug up and then left to spew dust and mud run-off.This has never been a good-faith effort by the owners. And, as a nearby neighbor,I've had enough.The house needs upkeep.The barn should sit on the ground. And remediation should take place in a timely and continuous way. Sincerely, Patricia Cristol 425 King Street Orient, NY 11957 patricia.cristol@icioud.com 917-821-7441 ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emaiis. . 1 i s 1.� ,FT (1 JUN 2021 I BY.- zi, 'b� r June12,2021 William J.Kanz,Jr. 1775 Village Lane, P.O. Box 1 Orient, NY 11957 Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Zoning Board Members, I am writing regarding the ZBA application concerning the construction at 95 Navy Street,Orient, NY. I recently attended the 3 June 2021 ZBA Public Hearing and an earlier Historic Preservation Commission held January 2021. I have lived full-time at my present address in Orient for about 50 years and have made every effort.to accurately preserve the historic nature of our home.My wife, Nancy,and 1 were pleased when the Orient Historic District was created.The overall changes in the 95 Navy Street are very extensive and out-of- character.It is my belief that if the Historic Preservation Commission and the ZBA approve additional residents making such extensive changes to their properties,it would not be accurate to call this the Orient Historic District. As I walk by the site most days, I am disturbed by the concrete walls being constructed around much of the property.Were these walls,if required,submitted to the Historic Preservation Commission for review? Also consider that this project has dragged on for many years and two weeks is a short time to give the public to submit written comments before the 17 June ZBA meeting.As an aside, in the future consideration should be given to requiring the addition of three-dimensional plans for such extensive changes to a property.The two-dimensional plans are complex and difficult for the general public to comprehend. I suggest that the ZBA consider compromises and changes more in keeping with the historic character of the Orient Historic District.Considering how long this project has gone on, I suggest requiring a time frame for completion of the renovations. on a personal and specific level,most days I drive around the intersection of Willow Street and Vincent Street. Due to the limited parking available and workman's vehicles,sometimes I have had to back up due to the street being blocked.The ramp being proposed for access to the barn from Willow Street will add to the congestion and may entail safety issues.I suggest consulting with the Southold Highway Department.They will have to plow snow in the winter. I am submitting the letter because of my love for this village where we brought up our family and I am concerned.about what may happen in the future.I believe the ZBA also has similar concerns. Please allow.more time for research on compromises. Thank you for your service to the community. 1 (tll. 5 Sincerely, ��i� 1 1 �0 w" .4 2021 GG% B Y. 5d 1Nilliam J. Kanz,Jr. - — ___ [Zoning ECEIVED 3180 Orchard Street Board or Appeals _ PO Box 473 Orient,NY 11957 631-323-3501; 631-276-8958 June 13, 2021 To: Southold Town Board of Appeals Re: 95 Navy Street—Bertault Application _ d" The Orient Historic District was officially designated in 1976, � alignwi-- t celebration of the Bicentennial. It has been a source of pride and has offered a sense of participation in the rich history of this small place at the end of Long Island for generations of Orient residents, whether descendants of the founding families or "incomers" who have made Orient home. Like all historic districts it is also fragile, and its preservation has had to rely over the years not only on the dedication of those who chose to live in and preserve the historic structures, but also on a patchwork of legislations rethought and revised over the years, to greater or lesser success, as development pressure has increased throughout the East End. The community has confronted two very troublesome applications within the last year, both of which would have unalterably transformed the integrity of the District. Thankfully, the first has been resolved, but only after much anxiety and activism on the part of the community, which had been brought much too late into the discussion, defying a significant element of the relevant Town law. The same appears to be true with this application, which presents perhaps the greatest threat to the cohesion and sense of place that the district has faced. Whether with the approval of various committees or without it,work has been proceeding which, if allowed to stand, will create the greatest intrusion into the atmosphere of the district that we have seen. It should be stopped. The application has revealed one issue related to the district which must be addressed up front in a unified way. That is the means of dealing with a potential rise in the waters of the bay without elevating the buildings. Such elevation would completely destroy the integrity of the historic landscape, and the issue cannot be addressed piecemeal. As I have pointed out during the discussion of the house on Skipper's Lane, Orient (formerly Oysterponds) was a community of working people. The owners of large farms and the successful whaling captains built relatively large homes on the Main Road, but the village itself consisted of relatively modest homes of carpenters and shopkeepers, seamstresses and innkeepers, fishermen and shoemakers.Needless to say there were no swimming pools; whether they should have been permitted at all in the district is a serious question, but at least the insistence on placement in the rear of the house lends some visual protection, and certainly no variances should be given. There are no walled properties in the district; but the installation of a major wall around this property is in progress. If it has been approved by Historic Preservation, I think the community deserves an explanation. If there has been no permission, a stop work order should be issued. It is an entirely alien element and destroys the cohesion of the district. There should be no approval of a ramp to a garage or other alterations to the existing ground level. The Historic District is no place for an elaborate vacation home (with a "cabana"!), two pools (?), and a ramped parking garage; it is a mockery of the integrity of the district. A comparison with the old photograph of the simple house and its tree is poignant. There is plenty of land in Orient available for the sort of development this application proposes. There is no justification for permitting it in the designated Historic District. There will continue to be the kind of pressure on the district that we are seeing if the Town and its agencies do not agree on meeting it with not only strong regulation but also strong resolution. Also,the community should have an opportunity for early input on all committee decisions, as per the legislation. It might also be a good idea for the Town to create a clearly written guide laying out the specific restrictions of the district, which realtors would be required to give to potential purchasers. The Town should also consider more collaboration between the various committees in addressing all of the contributing factors in a coherent and unified way rather than piecemeal. The problem will only become worse, and we are in great danger of losing an invaluable and irreplaceable sense of place. Sincerely, Frednca Wachsberger cc. Historic Preservation Committee; Planning Board Timothy T Frost Bayhotise 1995 Village Lane Orient,New York 11957 RECEIVED 13 June 2021 021 Zoning Board of Appeals Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall. Annex Building Southold, New York BY HAND/ DROPBOX Re:.ZBA Applications for 95 Navy Street in Orient Chairperson Weisman and Fellow Board Members: I am°a 35=year resident of Orient Village and the owner of 1995 and 2190.Village Lane. Both properties are near the Applicant's property, and my-permanent residence (1995 Village Lane) is within the sightline of his barn and Willow Street frontage This letter is written as a follow up to my previous letter of 10 June based upon a more thorough.review of Laserfiche digital files currently`accessible on the .Town's website and other availaable information. For ease of review by the ZBA, although there is.significant overlap and commonality of issues, I will attempt to categorize my comments a$they relate to the Applicant's separate variance applications. Specific Comments to ZBA Application #7467 (the "Howse",) I will start at the beginning..: 1. County Mandated Restrictivet venant Missing from Property Deed: The property transfer deed of 28 June 2005 between the Applicant and the former owner of 95 Navy contains language with respect to compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law and the . cost of improvements..Presumablythis language relates to the previous owner's subdivision undertaken in 2005 prior to the sale. A review of the-files associated with the 2-lot subdivision states that the Suffolk.County Department of Health Services would grant approval "subject to the following conditions... A covenant shall be provided, in language acceptable to the County Attorney, that the approved lots shall not be further Frost Letter—Supplemental Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy /� 14 June 2021 /�� 1 subdivided and each lot is limited to one-single family residence only with accessory uses as may be approved by the Town of Southold". (Memorandum, dated 22 November 2004, from Stephen A. Costa (Chairman, Board of Review) to Brian L Harper (Commissioner,Suffolk County Department of Health Services). Unfortunately, and inexplicably,the language of this required restrictive covenant is not part of the digital deed available on the Town's Laserfiche. I would respectfully suggest that the nature of the.covenant restrictions requires time for appropriate investigation and review with 'the'Suffolk"County Department of Health Services and.the Office of the County ..Attorney. 2. Insufficient Detail Regarding Pool, Pool Surround,and Mechanicals. General. understanding:of specifications for pool, pool surround ands location of mechanicals should be made available and reviewed by ZBA prior to issuance of a variance and" submission of.detailed-specifications to the Building Department. 3v,..Visible, Unscreened-Location of Pool. At the June 3rd meeting the Applicant's architect and lawyer claimed.that the pool will be screened for privacy.While no pool fence was indicated on the plans shown on June 3r.,there is now a site.plan submitted.on June:0 that shows a hedge with hidden wire.fencing. It calls for a four-foot-high hedgerow in front of a retaining wall and the grade on the pool side of the retaining wall is almost four feet above the base of the hedge..This would provide no screening at all at the southeast corner of the pool: Because Navy Street slopes up, and the pool is raised up four feet from.natural.grade; it is likely that-the pool will also be.vis.ible from,Navy Street. 4. House Setback--Adding to and Expanding a Non-Conforming Condition. There are no site plans that show the location of the paved street in relationship to the property,so it is.difficult to gauge the proximity of the,house to.the street in judging-whether a variance should be granted for the location of the house/new wraparound.porch..The Applicant's attorney submitted photographs of many houses with wraparound porches but there are scant few that are as close to the street as this one. The inclusion of the new porch section.wrapping around the corner at the east side of the original.house serves no.practical function: The fact that the existing house is set back less than three. feet from the property line does not mean that this nonconforming-condition should be expanded. 5. Inconsistent, Ever-changing and different Document Submissions to HPC and ZBA.At" the June 3rd ZBA Public Hearing,.a public participant pointed out that the elevation drawings'on the ZBAtaserfiche (specifically referenced as "Bertault—HPC Revised Elevations 03._11.2.1. received 5-21-2021")were incomplete and, inadvertent or not, misleading in that such drawings did not delineate "New/Existing" features on the North 2 Frost Letter—Supplemental Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 14 June 2021 or South elevations. The public participant also highlighted and noted that such elevation drawings did not adhere to what is an industry practice of distinguishing such "New/Existing" features by use of color contrast for the shingjed outer-walls: On June 4t"the Applicant's architect submitted "95 Navy St ZBA Area Variance with Approved HPC Updates" which confirms the public participant's point and shows that the industry practice of color contrast of outer walls to distinguish New/Existing features—although used in the-12.15.20 elevations--was inexplicably omitted from the 03.11.21 revisions. Today, almost two.months after the HPC approval vote for the Applicant's Certificate of Appropriateness (CoA), there is wholly incomplete digital documentation on HPC's - Laserfiche as to the basis of such approval,which, I would:also note; Aas done without appropriate public hearing. To add further insult to injury, and as was pointed out in my initial comments to the ZBA (Letter dated 10.June),the high masonry walls that are currently under construction were not submitted for review by the HPC even though walls and fences are components that require review. >6 "Seasonal Dwelling" as Permanent Residence; The Town's.20.15 Certificate of Occupancy (CoO) for the house (2-30982) is for a "Seasonal Dwelling" and the entry under "Type Heat" is "None". In submissions, Applicant has claimed his dwelling as his "Permanent.Residence", but,with a Seasonal Coo andthe (united electrical usage shown in submitted documents, doubt is raised as to the Applicant's claim that this is his permanent residence. In addition,there is not a need for the Applicant tooccupy the,, barn during the renovation/expansion of the "Seasonal Dwelling" h-e may be mischaracterizing as his permanent residence. Specific Coriiments to ZBA Application #7468SE (the "Barri"y 7. Removal and Replacement of tho Historic Wiliovw Tree: Modified.plans show the removal of the historic willow tree for which-the street is na,rrmetl. The maintenance:,of such tree was a condition of HPC granting the CoA in 2014. Granting of the variance would, require the ZBA to set a precedent of-seemingly "stepping on the toes" and:over- ruling conditions mandated in the HPC's 2014 CoA. This tree'is essential to'the historical landscape and is needed to soften the visual street view of the relocated barn now sitting atop'a foundation 4-ft above street grade. S. Proposed Parking Ramp and Driveway on Willow Street is Unsafe:The placement of a ramped parking area and driveway on Willow Street is unsafe. The adjacent neighbor's, existing driveway is located on a curve. The proposed location of the ramped driveway. would.create conflicting access to the two driveways on the curved road.There is no reason to knowingly and intentionally create such an unsafe condition, especially one heightened by the slope of the proposed parking area and driveway, The Applicant 3 Frost Letter—Supplemental Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 14 June 2021 should not be allowed transfer his own vehicular traffic and the impacts associated with :.it upon an adjacent property owner. And owner enjoyment should not justify altering °the character of the existing neighborhood, imposing the burden on to adjacent properties simply for the Applicant's "'enjoymen:t". 9. "Driveway Pitch Scheme is inaccurate: On June 4th the Applicant's.architect filed-this document in response to concerns raised by the public at the June.3rd ZBA Public Hearing. Posted on the ZBA's Laserfiche several days later, it depicts a rendering of the ramped driveway/parking area,between Willow Street,and the entrance to the barn. It is flawed, inaccurate, and, inadvertent or intentional, misleading; as fo.11ows:. The drawing accurately notes:there are 25 feet from the barn structure to property line.The trench drain at the base of the ramp is a mliniblum of one foot 1n.width, allowing only a 24-foot run for the-base of the ramp to the barn. Base elevation at property line is, as stated in this and drainage plan, 4:7'. The Ground Floor as stated in previously submitted plans is 8.6', not 8.0' as stated in t; . this rendering. As submitted, calculation of slope/grade is in error. Mathematical calculation of the angle at the ramp base is 9:269 degrees, not 7.125, as shown in the "scheme", resulting in a slope or.grade of 16:32% Parking, e-nteri:ng and exiting a slope of this grade drop presents a clear hazard.to both pedestrian and vehicular traffic t 10. ZBA Variance'S,hould be-Conditioned on,the Need for New HPC GoA: Although the a fenestration appears to ali;gnwith-that of the original barn, the old windovi s have,been. removed.Therefore, HP'C needs to review fenestration details'for any exterior work as it is within their jurisdiction, and anew application and CoA witl be required.Therefore, a new HPC CoA should be a specific condition for a ZBA variance and issuance of any building permit for the barn. T Common and Overlapping Comments to Both Applications 11: Poor Precedent to Grant Waivers When -Sound Alternatives are Available.The proposals before the ZBA for both the house and the barn are NOT the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the Applicant both to enjoy the use of their property and, at the same time, to preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood-as well as the health, safety, and welfare of the community.There are reasonable alternatives to the proposed plan that achieve the Applicant's desires and provide_for far greater compliance. if alternatives exist, ZBA should consider them rather than setting the precedent of granting multiple waivers when there are sound alternatives. 4 Frost Letter—Supplemental Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 14 June.2021 I .,Alternative Parking Space Solutions are Available to Applicant: The parking space in ..the barn and the one opposite the "Wood Shop" which`would necessitate the removal -of the Historic Willow Tree can easily be accommodated, on grade, on the Navy Street side of the property. in addition to being a far safer alternative than parking, entry and exit on a steeply sloped (1632%) ramp. 13. Alternative Single-floor Corripi ance Available to Applicant: With the barn/parking space alternative highlighted above an additional approximate 354 sgft is available on the first floor. Applicant can easily accommodate the proposed 302;sgft proposed`livi+ng area on the:second<floor by using freed-.p space on the first floor so that single =' floor compliance can be achieved.The footprint of the barn is sufficiently large 3' a roximatel 800s f of interior space)to house an apartment on the ground level; an,d any hardship involved in restrictingit to one level is self-imposed.The floorplan filed into the ZBA Laserfiche on J'u:ne 4t" indicate a full one-bedroom home with a double heigh.t"living=room.This is neither in the spirit nor the letter of the Town Code: Allowing a two-story accessory."apartment", which is in this case a one-bedroom home, on a property that.is less than half the required lot size in an R-40 district is not a good or Welcome precedent. 14 .Need:f or Objective; Specific and'Measurable Criteria for"Conditioned" ZBA Approval: Given-the long history and uncertainty as to the specific meaning of past approvals F; relating to 95 Navy; if the ZBA were to grant approval, consideration should be given to K conditioning such approval based on specific, clear, objective, and measurable.criteria. For example; with respect to the historic willow tree, which the Ap.plicarit now proposes to remove a.rid replace with a other willow tree, considerationshould.be given td conditioning such approval As shown in the Applicant's current,plan, if the ZBA were to grant approvali such approval should be specifically conditioned on the replacement tree.being of.egval size (height and caliper)to the tree it r4places. .Fcmthe avoidance of doubt-- and the comfort of all—specific, clear, objective, and measurable standards are necessary and warranted. 15. Approval Conditioned on Posting Completion Bond: With respect to the barn, given the amount-of time that has passed since ZBA/HPC approvals in 2014 and the failure to "preserve and restore as.is", prudence suggests-the posting of a completion bond'may. be warranted. 16. Increased Impermeable Coverage of Lot and Reduced Absorptive Capacity: Under Town Code.the allowable" lot coverage" is 20%. The Applicant's plans indicate an increase in existing lot coverage to 17.2%. However, applicant is adding many impermeable fixtures to the property (steeply ramped asphalt driveway, enlarged and 5 Frost Letter—Supplemental Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 14 June 2021 relocated "rain garden pond", extensive bluestone/paver walkway, lengthy runs of -multiple retaining walls, etc.). These impermeable fixtures and the proposed additions to the residence and accessory cabana structure, in combination with the proposed extensive back filling and grading of the site, will significantly reduce the absorptive capacity of the applicant's property and should require a more detailed analysis by a professional hydrologist. 17: Plans for Review are Not Signed and Stamped. Several of the plans, particularly those related to drainage and septic appear to not be signed and stamped. Final Comments Will'the variances requested produce an undesirable change to the.character of the neighborhood? Let's face it--undesirable changes have already occurred with the-destruction of mature trees and in introduction of tall masonry walls and fences. Th.e addition of a second home;with improperly screened front-yard pool and the expansion of the porch would only -add further insult to injury W.hat's`d.one s'done, and What once was an approximateone-acre lot with a permanent re8t4fte, seasonal dwelling, and barn has.now morphed and, on.a,lot of less than half its former size, is now proposed by the Applicant to include: i.) a permanent residence, H.) barn/garage; iithan accessory apartment; iii.) pool; and, iv:) an-accessory(cabana) structure. a This represents an-intensif ication of Use that overwhelms the site. y In_its deliberations, i have faith-that the ZBA will fully consider the Appliczint's.prap osal considering the speeif c-fi dings and determinations required by the "Use Regulations"set forth in 280-13 B. (13) (k) of the-Tovwn Code. Specifically, for many of the reasons stated in these comme:ntsand those of.adjacent landowners and neighbors, i trust,take comfort; and do not believe the ZBA can objectively make the following specific positive determinations req.0 red by the Town Code with respect to the'Applicant's current proposal: ® 280-13 B. (13) (k) [1] ..: that it "will not adversely impact the privacy and use and enjoyment of any adjoining parcel.'. 280-13 B. (13) (k) [2] ...that it "will not adversely Impact the character of the neighborhood in which it is located". 280-13 B. (13) (k) [3] ...that it "will not have a cumulative adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood". 6 Frost Letter—Supplemental Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 14 June 2021 280-13 B. (13) (k) [5] ... "that sufficie.nt off-street parking exists on the subject property to accommodate the proposed. accessory apartment". 280-13 B. (13) (k) [6] "whether adequate buffer yards and screening can and will be provided to prote.ct .ad,jacent properties from Possible detrimental impacts.of the proposed use.,, Despite the foregoing, ifasomehow the ZBA were to.grant variances for the curren,tly proposed house,,pool and/or accessory apartment, I respectfully-request ZBA consideration.that-nor work be permitted to proceed until a master-plari, inclddirigAll relevant proPosed-improv.6ments is granted-a Certificate of Ap' ropri tenessb thel-I.P.C-anda proved by.the various other Town a. , y p P agencies and the Suffolk.Cou!nty Department of Health St.tvices. The existing piecemeal approach has only exacerbated the,problem-for.all.cdncerned.:In addition,with the-continued addition of-amended plans to the ZBA Laserfiche, if the hearing is "dosied', I.Would-aiso respbafully.request-MA consideration thatthe record be kept"open" so that additional ipublic comrtient,can be submitted prior to ZBA rendering a decision. In closing, Whatever your decision, I want to thank you for both your thoughtful consideration of this matter-and your dedicated service to. 11the.Town arlid,residents of SouthoW. Sincereiy /S/Timothy T Frost Atf cc: -Scott A. Russell Town Supervisor Bill Duffy—Towh.Attorney Mariella Ostroski Chairperson, HPC 7 anon SW ulktAu Richard J Gillooly 70�_ 75 Willow StreetOrient,New York 11957 �1W� 2� June 13, 2021 ® �i�� Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Hall Annex Southold,NY Re:95 Navy Street,Orient,lY My property is across Willow Street access to the subject,has been owned by me for approximately 50 years.Lam.a full time resident I have attended several hearings over many years regarding the proposed alterations to the subject property,and expressed my concerns at the 2014 HPC hearing.I objected to the barn relocation at that time in part because there was no complete plan for the site.I was assured that any use would be restricted to non residential,and that the historic features of the neighborhood and the structures would be preserved and the existing willow and holly trees would be protected,This neighborhood has endured years of disruption and neglect by the owner and are now witnessing inappropriate and unregulated construction that is drastically changing the character and safety of those of us who live here. We have relied on the good people who sit on the HPC and the ZBA to protect this historic neighborhood and the town officials to uphold the laws,regulations,and safety of the community.This situation is now OUT OF CONTROL. The owner of 95 Navy Street has now even damaged the abutting neighbors trees and screening by cutting the root systems for his walls which were not reviewed by HPG Now we are being asked to live with a large ramp as a remedy for poor site planning to accommodate parking for a proposed owner occupied apartment when appropriate parking should have been provided on Navy Street Any further action by the Town must be postponed until a complete review of final plans and-speciRaations and-assurances-that:they be strictly adhered to and completed on a timely basis. Thank you for your consideration of this difficult situation and your service to the Town and residents of Orient Sincerely, Cc Scott Russell,Town pereisor .4 Ryan Sullivan 18.55 Village Lane P.O. Box 4. ED Orient, NY 11957 Zon�ng June 14,2021 - . � ,eoar�of Appeals Zoning:Board of Appeals. Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25/.P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 ZBA Application 7467:.&7468SE: : Filed 12/21/2020 95 Navy Street,'0 95 SCTMI#::1000-26-1712:2 '- -Supplemental Submission Dear Chair Weisman and Board Members: J am writing as a concerned neighbor and Orient resident regarding 95 Navy Street.- A live a few houses away on.Village Lane,and have watched this property devolve from a charming local summer house too-a sporadic and years-long construction site. The owners have shown no consideration for the neighborhood, its.quality of life,or our valued trees. Although I don't usually contribute to discussions about my neighbor's property ambitions, this project has compelled me to do so. It has been carelessly stripped of mature trees with no good faith effort to preserve them: The sudden erection of concrete retaining walls around the permitter of the property has alarmed me and my family enough to write a letter of concern and opposition to this outsized project that is out of step with this village's character. During the June 3rd ZBA Public Hearing we learned about the proposal of adding a pitched driveway which would exit on to Willow Street. We have serious safety concerns about this proposal. This is a quiet block enjoyed by children, adults and pets alike, and the addition of a FOURTH driveway on to a go-degree bend in this road is unquestionably dangerous. As I've delved into this years of discussion and submissions regarding this property,the conflicting proposals on file are concerning at best. I admire and respect the work and dedication it takes to maintain a historic district and it's rigorous review process, and although I have rarely felt the need to involve myself in opposition to anyone's property dreams, the scope of this project has compelled me to do so. Living in a historic district means we all make sacrifices—we don't all get to build big extensions or suspiciously change the purpose of our historic outbuildings for our personal- pleasure—it is indeed a sacrifice but it worth the effort to maintain this.special town for_generations to come. Sincerdy yours; Ryan Sullivan Fuentes, Kim From: Kathleen Kmet Becker <kkbkmet@optonline.net> Sent: Tuesday,June 15, 2021 8:00 AM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: 95 Navy Street- Orient, NY Attachments: KathleenBecker- 95 Navy St -June 14 2021.pdf JUN �uv Good morning Kim,. Please find attached my comments and concerns regarding the 95 Navy Street Project. Would you kindly give copies to all the.ZBA Board Members before the June 17th meeting. Respectfully, Kathleen Becker Orient, NY ATTENTION: This email came-from an external source. Do not open attachments or cl.ick on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails, 1 Kathleen K Becker 154 King Street POB 151 Orient,NY 11957 631-323-1326 917-743- 7176 kkbkmet@optonline.net CA June 14,2021 Zoning Board of AppealsTown of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 - P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: 95 Navy Street: Orient Chair Weissman and Board Members I am writing this letter as a concerned full time resident of Southold Town of 27 years. The changing landscape and character of the various towns and hamlets in the Town of Southold has been accelerating with new development and renovations creating precedents that are forever altering the character of Southold Town,all under the watch of the various agencies and departments responsible for enforcing regulations currently in place. I certainly understand that change is often inevitable and there is a proper place for variances when there is a justifiable"hardship"aligned with a matching"relief". The "discovery" of the North Fork along with other market forces has increased construction activity and there are many more applications for a range of private property improvements --- each and every one trying to squeeze the most value out of their property to offset their investment. The pressure and burden have fallen on the Town's staff and volunteer Board members,a dedicated group that is in badly need of additional resources and support. Is there a coordinated system of communication within the Town between its own departments and with the public regarding projects to engage early on during the process to ensure that there are not unintended consequences due to lack of action or oversight. The Laserfiche (which requires training) and the website calendar is all the public has and the inconsistencies and incomplete materials does not inspire confidence in that the public record is fully transparent. The ZBA June 3rd publi6meeting for 95 Navy.Street Was-less productive for exactly this reason. Lessons need to be learned from the failings associated by the 95 Navy Street. If the leaders of the Town don't make efforts to manage the"success",we will lose what makes the North Fork special, magical place. Kathleen Becker 1 i Y Variances at 95 Navy Street-The Gift that Keeps on Giving Regarding the 95 Navy Street project, I understand that the current owner was the beneficiary of the first variance granted represented by the subdivision of the property,and therefore was fully aware of the property's development constraints. With a design background, Mr. Bertault envisioned a broader plan for the'site and based on a very weak "hardship"case,and the insistence,that his intent was to restore and preserve, both HPC and ZBA granted another variance to this property which dramatically increased its value at the expense of the community. The relocation of the accessory structures set the stage for yet a third variance request, and if approved,.will represent the cumulative transformation of the property, and in effect,a large gift from the Town to a property owner whose benefits are excessive and again,at the expense of his neighbors,historic Orient,and the community at large. I do remember the community opposition'to the 2014 decisions and so many of the issues and concerns are being repeated today and may again be overlooked. And yet,the owner who was so committed in his intentions,as stated by Gary O'Conner,the project architect, at the end of his letter dated March 13, 2014 below,tries to explain away is current lack of commitment. In eloehig,I would like to re terAtz ibat the rational to reloo4to.,the bam nsides r$t>itlt the 0,%Mees staicd goal or ie.storing tho bom,,elg vehicular iratric adjacent to the hottselir «s the solitk syster .and;for the shpl plogrro 00trea g quality pe in th vowcv of*;Pmport'.for ordening and the Owners Wo r nt,. The back-pedaling in his March 22, 2021 letter to dismiss factual observations (not conspiracy theories) and to justify the current variance request, shows the maneuvering and distraction that weakens the Board's ability to maintain a sharp view of the details of the case,the underlying"hardship" (if any),and-the cumulative history and impacts at the property..Below,the March 22, 2021 letter-to the ZBA.by Mr. O'Conner,the owner's architect: fids:1v�c\�IIY isnif�faLse:iccu�att~au� liatfc�t�€ci�°.�cs�'t�r��B 'ri i�'�Oi�}tt� : dsuienumtisvad'pair"ofaLuges�stotto_ixuslead;tl�eBeard f)urstteuienisrcgarr gbam:us ;�ire true�the titrie aad Iac�rtbeze�ss�c�r tt as�vst{i the pxripei#�z bue� a�cu�ciat�stuice c1a�n�ef both cts riduallY M C:i�r tiii fall :cans cg gla ns to oit as�d clime hxcfs R4s.Bttei�1� auzdersta�ac �?r ccntee a1 i } tsti6 has.a couspuacY!ingo Oxio a tarmi prat to niut. Tzer Coma�nay Zt a 1i%iaa LTi Berta'qtr h :k u tkie<ti a e sszc etu #tre dam relacatio . A visit to the site shows this is now no longer a preserve,protect, restore,project in character with the historic district it in,but a non-historic barn with no trees left as stipulated. 1 Attached is a sample of the community concerns in 2014 Kathleen Becker 2 V The ZBA,with all its authority, must be the "firewall"as one community member said at the hearing in this case in particular. Yes, it is true,we all were fooled by the owner and naive to think that"restore and preserve'.'was his'top priority. Aside from recognizing the violations associated with the 2014 decisions,the cumulative impacts to date must inform the upcoming ZBA and'HPC decisions --- determinations and conditions that .stand firm and are aligned the law and balanced with the interests of the community in mind. Respectfully, Kathleen Becker Enclosures CC: Historic Preservation Commission Building Department Towri Board. Town Trustees Kathleen Becker 3 PATRICIA C. MOORE n Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 - - Tel: (631)76513330 n Fax:(631)7654643 ` March 5, 2014 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 - Southold, NY 11971 Re:Vincent Bertault#6729 Dear Chairperson Weisman and Board: represent William.Gesell and his family, they are an adjacent property owner . and would be adversely impacted by the relocation of the barn to Willow Street. They. oppose this application. In my review of the application the following variances are required but have not been included in this application: (1) Setback variance.from a "front yard"which requires a minimum of 35'when 20' is requested. (2)Accessory Building exceeds maximum size permitted of 660 sf. ft. and exceeds 18' in height. The barn is 850 sq.ft and the heigh is not provided. (3).The Flood Zone may affect the height of the existing structure. The Flood Zone is AE 6 which will require the finished flood elevation to be a minimum of 8'. it is not clear .what the owner intends to do with the relocated structure and at what height the s foundation will be built. The property was previously owned by Mr. And Mrs. Woodhouse who obtained area variances to subdivide this and the adjacent parcel on Bay Avenue and Navy Street. Attached are the transcripts of the Zoning Board hearing, appeal #5218 of 2003. There was impassioned testimony at the hearing on the historic nature of the property and the existing structures. The subdivision supported the owner's desire to maintain the existing historic barn which was built between 1906 and 1920. i i , n jr r t{ .s .:.. �..5 ;# r n 71'4 Y SKY QJ AMOCO Now 3M z WI M t az Tmm Otto WIN Ad -Us Oman a-.� �,5 �•��-w... ., � r'{� _-<�-., ��""� cepa. � t��` §,,� { s - - a F ti 1 Awl- towns, 4 S r � � - v t � MY! wXymmynal laws XON is _. 311 9 WAR r3 \4 S x k ]ZAx. :. ... :• vial 3 t a x r � �N� �P�il MAV• �a* a �' ' � `aas�4" '8 .«� •.� t 'tray c _ _ k t ZVs } s a 2f W— ulle! / t j, J1 w or f /r` / The subdivision was supported by the neighbors because it preserved the integrity of the existing structures. The location of the structures is as important to the n preservation of Orient Village as the structures themselves. Moreover, moving the barn could compromise the structural integrity of the existing structure, The applicant's reason to relocate the barn is not rational. It is much less expensive to place "traffic bearing" covers on the existing sanitary system then to relocate the barn. Finally, the notice of disapproval was revised to include approval of the Landmark Preservation Commission. This hearing should be postponed until the Landmark Preservation Commission reviews this application. This application needs a coordinated review. It is unlikely that the Landmark Preservation Commission will approve this application. Relocation of the bam should be denied. y trul ours, ricia C. Moore . encls: m 1� ` Patricia C. Moore9 Q:i Ct=T1/= ;7 Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 -MAR 2 1 2014 Tel:(631)7654330 ,(� Fax:(631)765-46431/v :1.i' P C'A LS March 21, 2014 Ms.Leslie Weisman, Chair and Members of the Southold Town Zoning,Board Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Appeal#6,729./Vincent Bertault Dear Chair Weisman and Board Members: y Please accept these written comments into the record in the above-referenced appeal. ✓1 Objections and Concerns: • Relocation of the barn is unnecessary. The frame barn in its existing location can serve as a garage using access to Navy Street. A pervious driveway and/or sanitary covers over the existing septic system make the requested variances unnecessary. The applicant's obj ective [refurbishment and use of existing barn]_can be achieved by some . method,feasible for the applicant to pursue,other than an area variance. • Relocation of barn is detrimental to character of neighborhood and neighboring property.- Enclosed please find Google Earth photographs of the subject property and surrounding area.' Vincent and Willow Streets are quiet,tree lined residential properties. The applicant's property abutting Willow Street is wooded. The relocation of the barn and placement of a driveway on Willow Street as proposed is unsafe. The Gesell's existing driveway is located on a curve. The proposed location of the barn and driveway would create conflicting access of the two driveways on the curved road. There is no reason to knowingly and intentionally create such an unsafe condition. • Nonconforming Structure cannot be altered without creating new non-conformity. The frame barn is already a non-conforming structure. It exceeds 660 square feet. The ' Exhibit 1 [aerial photos of Willow Street and Vincent Street] Exhibit 2 [Gesell house and driveway showing applicant's barn in present location 82 feet from Willow Street Patricia C. Moore Attorney at Law MAR 2 Y 2014 March 21, 2014 1tPPCALS Re: Appeal#6729 Bertault proposed relocation of the structure necessitates variances. Section 280-122(A)prohibits the alteration of a non-conforming structure if such alteration creates new or increased non-conformity. The application to relocate the.non-conforming barn is prohibited by this section-of the Town Code because the applicant seeks a front yard variance which constitutes a new non-conformity with the Code. • Accessory structure in frout yard requires 35 foot setback. The proposed relocation of the barn.at 20 feet' in the front yard violates the 35 foot setback requirement for front yard structures. The applicant cannot use average setbacks of principal structures within 300 feet to justify location of the accessory structure. • Height of Relocated Barn violates height requirements. The applicant has suggested to relocate the barn with a 25 feet setback with an"adjusted barn height" of 18.ft. 9 inches above "finish grade to the ridge" As stated above,the setback requirement is 5 feet and the proposed height violates the zoning.code height limitations: Building height is defined and measured from the "natural grade" [Southold Town Code§ 280-4] not,as proposed by the applicant above a"finished" grade. •" Application fails to meet legal standards to justify variance. New York Town Law §276-b(3)(b).set.forth the criteria the Board must consider before granting an area variance. The applicant has not satisfied these criteria. The applicant's stated rationale' forthe variance is [1j restore the barn; [2]eliminate vehicular traffic adjacent to applicant's home!across the septic system and [3]'simple pleasure of creating quality open space in the center of the property for the Owner's enjoyment. Respectfully, the stated rationale does not satisfy the legal criteria to justify issuance of the requested and necessary variances. The barn can be restored in its present location without variances. The applicant should not transfer his own vehicular traffic and the impacts associated with it upon the adjoining property owner. And owner enjoyment does not justify altering the character of ' By letter dated March 13, 2014,the applicant's architect has amended the proposed setback to 25 feet which still violates the required 35 foot setback in the Code. s Letter of Gary R. O'Connor, AIA dated March 13, 2014. � 1 I Patricia C. Moore Attorney at Law ` March 21,2014 Re: Appeal#6729 Bertault the existing neighborhood, imposing the burden of a non-conforming structure in a non- conforming location on the property on the neighbor simply for the owner's "enjoyment." It is respectfully requested that the Board deny the requested variances. Sincerely;- r f atricia C. Moore PCM/mr MAR Z cc: William Gesell FJUND RECEIVED] June 14, 2021 021 Zoning Board of Appeals f Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA Application 7467 &7468SE Filed 12/21/2020 95 Navy Street, Orient NY SCTM # 1000-26-1712.2 Supplemental Submission Dear Chair Weisman and Board Members: We are writing to express our extreme disappointment at what we have been witnessing since 2013, when our neighbors, at 95 Navy Street,first moved their historic barn from its original spot to its current location,just off Willow Terrace. We live at 230 Vincent Street, on the back side of the 95 Navy Street residence and when the barn was first moved,we were shocked. It was one of the most iconic and beautiful old barns in Orient, so to learn that it was being converted into an apartment was upsetting. We, along with many of our neighbors, signed a petition back then in 2014, opposing the change. Our biggest concern was that our tiny neighborhood (Fletcher/Vincent/Willow Street) could not handle another driveway or more cars/traffic. Nothing happened back then. The barn remained in its new spot and then, over years, started to deteriorate. What was once a symbol of historic Orient became an eyesore, upsetting to all of us who walk past it daily. The site was left in an ugly condition for years—with a large mound of gravel sitting right on the property line in the neighbor's front yard,the job partially completed. The neglected site degraded our community experience. Fast forward to the current circumstances: the property looks like a war zone. It began with the barn, which was fortified. At first,we were glad it was finally being taken care of. Then it was raised four feet, which gave us pause. We asked the contractor what he was doing, and he said the town demanded'this type of foundation. We thought it was strange,that the barn would be that much higher than all of its neighbors,but imagined a staircase or some sort of access point. To then see trenches being dug,trees being felled as a result (the 80-year-old Copper Beech on the adjoining Lewis property is especially upsetting,though the entire corner has been denuded which gives full view onto the property.) We zoomed in for the most recent ZBA meeting and were frankly aghast to learn that the trenches that were dug were for retaining walls that would be filled,we assume,with dirt to create a slope on an otherwise totally flat parcel. The retaining wall will create a level change with the adjacent properties which will be unusual and speaks to the need for a district wide policy about changing heights of buildings and land to accommodate minimum construction heights required in the flood plain. If this plan for 95 Navy Street is approved,then'one could imagine a patchwork of properties at different ' levels. Everyone in Orient Village who lives near the water will be impacted by raising water. Thi �/� property(95 Navy Street) is proof that our district needs a community-minded plan. In addition to being completely out of character to have this one property raised on a manmade hill, we were aghast to learn that there is a spot designed for two cars on the back side of the property, on Willow Street,to accommodate the fact there is no parking on Navy Street. This is unconscionable and dangerous. That corner is already crowded. To add another entrance/driveway makes that corner dangerously congested. That the "driveway" would be on such a steep grade would draw even more attention to the manmade grade and would be dangerous given the number of children who play and bike on this corner. We completely REJECT this.as a possibility and urge the board to do so as well. Evan Lewis lives on the adjoining property to 95_Navy Street and spoke at the recent ZBA zoom about his concern over the trench and retaining wall. He said that in digging of the trenches on the B95 Navy Street property,that the root system of an 80-year-old Copper Beech that is on his property was severed and that tree is now in peril. This is-a metaphor of what is happening. The complete and utter disregard the owners of 95 Navy Street have for any of their neighbors is striking. As far as code is concerned: the plans for an elevated barn turned accessory building turned two story . dwelling are not in keeping with the historic nature of our village. To allow this would set a dangerous precedent that people who have the means to hire lawyers and tear down historic buildings would use to make similar cases. Chairwoman Weisman,you mentioned this during this ZBA meeting and it struck a chord. Now is the time to strengthen code to make sure the historic charm and nature of Orient Village is not destroyed by people who want pools and cabanas and water views and more. This particular property has become a great example of a rallying community cry. We were particularly moved to see nearly every single one of our neighbors on that Zoom call—and not one person in favor of the changes proposed other than the applicant. That is the strongest sign that all requests be denied and altered to fit within the community understanding of what is appropriate. Sincerely, Liz and Gideon D'Arcangelo 230 Vincent St. Orient, NY 11957 Richard Hoblock 595Navy.Street: P.O. Box 114. EC/EI . Orient, N.Y. 11957 . .. . -richardhoblock@grnail:com, ,JUN (-310)508-5394:,;.,, :;,.:: iof Appeals Zoning B June 14, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals `RE,'ZBA_Application 7467 &,7468S-E. Town of Southold '95 Navy Street, Orient Town Annex Building P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear`Chairwoman Weisman, and Board Members: My husband.and l chose,to Live in the village of Orient because of its unique character,gentle landscapes, and balanced-scale, knowing well that the established town requirements and restrictions are.to keep it sensibly intact for future generations. We live at 595 Navy Street and have a direct line of view on what we believed was to be a renovated historical barn and home. We:have watched in shock and dismay as rebuilding and landscaping of the property at 95 Navy Street and the back of the property' Willow Street has expanded into what appears as a reckless permutation of established norms of local barns, land elevations, and village homes. What has oh-so-slowly evolved over the years has absolutely no regard for surrounding properties, landscape elevations,tree populations, or common decency. Quite frankly, and since the most recent variance hearing, we now feel lied to and duped. On record, what was to be a "like kind" barn has morphed into an alternative house, labeled as "workshop" and "garage spaces",the envy of any North Fork VRBO rental, with an array of new. land elevations inconsistent with everything surrounding this property. How did this happen in this special place, this special village? To have a functioning democracy, one needs honest and well-intentioned citizens with respect for neighbors, not neighborhood policemen policing deceit. After almost two years of being friendly, tolerant, and respectful of our neighbors and their very real property rights at 95 Navy Street,things have drastically turned. The deceit by the owners of 95 Navy Street has become increasingly and sadly apparent over the months and their."development milestones" now wreak of patiently crafted manipulation. We believe in the property rights of the owners of 95 Navy Street and, in fact, would fight for those rights that they hold, however odious we may find them. Yet we strongly do not believe in lies and willful manipulation of neighbors' trust and patience and established local laws. A sad and profound rift in trust has occurred, as well as an increasing blight on our existing homes and communal respect that unbridled and ridiculous ego seems to allow. Is this what we, have become and want to exist as in our chosen community? We answer with a resounding no this meplomaniacal;development and urge you to carefully consider our lives, neighbors, home and community:goih-J rward�. Tha ou. �.. Richard Hoblock Resident and Owner ; .595 Navy Street, Orient - < t - ,n-.._ )4 ri _ , .. i�.J ,.•.. ,F,.+ �,,-F., S. atv, � a.j _.. i i.1 � ?:' ��I[. .. -1 7"1 RAE(,.ri .. P1 �N ,i.Z . ..t,t i, r ..,•,x_.t. Nix _.,J;i`; i _rI L Vg. . w �: � .>r .?.-I...._- 1 .... ~'s �. ?'ry _.3d,' -. i i,4.,tJ fy•. . 3.... J,.- <. .- _. , ,.. 3.' t-,, 0,•�.r. .. .)`z .. ��_ , .r ',�.. <�.. t4 g`_ x,_, zy t. _ ? .,..1i4 :�:t�i _;y.-� „F � :�,� �a.• � r. ,.�; t,.cv,. - FP�j(:.i•r 7,-? �',R 14i•+t 5� ;{" a ��.e,� rt.,..V 1,. .?� .... r . .i.ls i �{':) i3,�✓ ?J Ast _r s: ... . t. . . ':fr:.. .._.... �.7�� , ._s„ ,t��... 1 To: ZBA officials honing Bod fAp 5� ppeals From:Jane and Sam Lear Date:June 13, 2021 My husband and I bought our house in Orient about seven years ago, and fell so much in love with the low-key,-rural character of the place,we decided to make it our fulltime residence. But things are changing rapidly out here, with little thought to the aesthetic and/or environmental consequences of your decisions, and it fills us with great sorrow and,yes, anger. That monstrous house on Narrow River Road that permanently destroys the view shed for all is one egregious example. And the "barn"on Willow Street-with its elevation FOUR FEET above the neighboring properties;proposed two-floor accessory apartment, and creation of ramps up to an indoor parking garage—is another. How those radical changes to the fabric of the historic district—and our community at large—can be allowed to move forward is shameful and an abdication of the responsibility of the ZBA. Before you make any further decisions on the matter;I have a suggestion: In addition to studying all the various-plans and schematics,why don't all the board members take a drive out to Orient and take a good, hard look at the property and how it relates'to the neighboring houses and overall community?Then keep going along King Street until you reach Narrow River Road and take a look at the new house there. It's too late to fix what is gone forever along one of the prettiest country lanes in the Northeast. It's up to you to prevent that sort of thing from .happening again. Sincerely, Jane and San! Lear June 14,.2021 Zoning Board of Appeals RBC ICED Town of Southold 4 �� Town Annex Building Zonin9 Board ofAp Apeals . P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA Application 7467 & 7468SE 95.Navy Street, Orient Filed 12/21/2020 Dear Chair Weisman and Board Members, I am long-time resident of Orient, owning the historic house at 295 Village Lane. I feel strongly about the value of the Orient Historic District,but I do believe that it is fragile and endangered. Inappropriate new building over time can so erode the nature of the district that it will no longer seem historic at all. This proposed radical alteration of the property between Nave and Willow Streets is'an ill-considered transformation of a quaint simple historic home into a modern-looking vacation compound. The community was relieved when in January of this year the HPC denied the application for a Certificate of Appropriateness, only to be shocked to learn that secret backroom negotiations between the applicant's attorney and the town attorney resulted in an approval in April. There is strong feeling that since this deal was struck without public input, it was possibly done illegally. It is my understanding that the only recourse to a denial of the CoA by the HPC is an appeal to the Town Board and if that appeal is denied,to the state courts. That process was not followed in this case. That secret back room deal was unsavory and erodes confidence in the transparency of the local governmental process. This application before you,even with HPC's blessing,is still a threat to the "character of the neighborhood in which it is located." That quote is from the Town Code listing considerations that the ZBA is to consider in granting special exceptions. By raising the level of the-ground so high behind retaining walls,the compound will tower over the neighboring properties; it will be out of scale to the historic homes surrounding it, changing the "character of the neighborhood." Another issue that is addressed in the Town Code is parking. The applicant has proposed placing all three parking spaces on the Willow Street side of the property. That has resulted in a plan to park one car in the "barn"with access by elevated ramps from Willow Street Several problems with this proposal could be solved by placing one parking space on Navy Street. That would allow the other two to be on ground level off of Willow Street. Thus there would be no need for the ramps, and no need for the accessory apartment to be on two floors. Another problem with this plan is the raising of the level of the overall property behind retaining walls. This elevation could easily have an "adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood" (another criteria that the Town Code mandates to be considered in granting special exceptions). When the inevitable storms come, the properties surrounding this newly-elevated property will be standing in even deeper water, especially the property on the bay side. The retaining walls certainly will interrupt the flow of water,potentially causing even worse flooding in the neighborhood. Has there be a proper hydraulic study of this rather radical plan? Why not just raise the house.but not the entire lot? There are numerous problems with this proposed transformation of the house and property, but I will address only one more. The request for a two-floor apartment in the "barn" should not be granted. The.'barn"will become,for all practical purposes, a second house on the property. By making slight alternations inside the building, such as adding a door here or there,the woodshop could become a living room, transforming the structure into a complete two-storyhouse. Requiring that the applicant limit the accessory apartment to one floor guarantees that the apartment . stays within the proper bounds. Besides,who designs an apartment with two floors for an elderly relative? This construction project has been ongoing for many years,which has made it very difficult for its Orient neighbors to follow the twists and turns. At this time,with so much done with such confusion, I see no reason to grant any special exceptions. Maybe it is high time that the applicant follows the rules,rules which protect the historic character of the neighborhood. Thank you for your attention to this most complicated problem. Orient is.relying on your good judgment. Sincerely, Charles Dean 295 Village Lane Orient, NY, 11957 crdorient@gmail.com 6 - RE E VED 1 JUN 1 5 15 June 2021 F 5 Zoning Boa d� gppeals Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building Southold, New York Re: ZBA Application for 95 Navy Street in Orient, Chairperson Weisman and Fellow Board Members: We are residents in the historic district of the village of Orient residing full-time at 20 Vincent Street since 12/12/19. The Bertault residence on 95 Navy Street is situated directly on the southern=west corner of our property where the retaining wall construction is underway and our driveway on Vincent is perpendicular to the back of the relocated barn on Willow Street where the projected car ramp is proposed'. We have been thoroughly consumed with daily, controversial concerns in what is happening in all matters to us, our neighbors and the gradual disintegration of the Vitality of our historic community setting due to the 95 Navy Street application project. First of all, we are in agreement with the 95 Navy Street property owners that they are, entitled to make changes to their property provided such changes meet the requirements of the Orient HPC/Southold Town Code. And, as adjacent homeowners, we have been unduly forced to be exceedingly tolerant with the barn relocation/raising, land property excavation, removal of our 6 mature Sycamore maple trees including stumps/roots and the massively intrusive daily loss of privacy typically 6 days week since the project began. However, the direct loss of our mature trees (photo #1), property aesthetic.(photo #2) and quality of life with the additional growing concern for the potential negative impact on our property value, land drainage and septic function, has now forced us to strongly question the nature of the approval process that has allowed the retaining wall at the very least to be constructed on such a significant scale. We are profoundly baffled that a such a vigorously, historic-preservation minded Commission that requires HPC approval for a simple property fence has allowed a visible, unconventional, incongruous 4' concrete retaining wall with a proposed slat fence on top without a standard regulatory review in a public hearing forum. In addition to this on-going sense of uncertainty, we are understandably concerned with compensation and remediation for damages as a result of the retaining wall project to our removed trees, lawn, cesspool cover, sprinkler line as well as the appearance of the finished retaining wall fascia design facing our property. The incompatibility of the 95 Navy Street project with key zoning sections of the ZBA Town Code is pervasive throughout its process. To begin with, we are strongly opposed to the projected unconventional parking ramp entering into the elevated barn on Willow. The ZBA is charged with assessing the effect that the location of the proposed use and its entrances and exits may have upon the creation of undue increase of vehicular traffic congestion to assure public safety. We already have significantly compromised traffic in the corner convergence of Willow and Vincent Street. Cars driving east on Willow must already drive with extreme caution when approaching the corner to make the left onto Vincent due to (1) the small left turn in the road, (2) 3 existing active driveways in the corner and (3) possible cars traveling south on Vincent. Increasing the risk for public safety cannot be underestimated at this already hindered intersection on our small, quiet village street location. Secondly, the general standard of storm water management compliance is questionable and how the potential water flow, drainage, flooding and soil erosion on our property will be impacted by the retaining wall has yet to be determined. Furthermore, at no time was the location and impact on our cesspool (photo #3)-which is less than 6 feet away from the retaining wall considered. We are highly concerned the retaining wall will impede the proper functioning of our cesspool and impair vital treatment, removal, and/or discharge of sewage that may pose a critical sanitation health risk as a result. Furthermore, we do not understand how the barn which was intended to remain barn was raised so high and is being considered for apartment use when the HPC awarded a certificate of appropriateness (CoA) to the applicant to move and restore the barn in 2014. The CoA was for "the proposed relocation of the historic barn and shed, according to the plans submitted, will result in the structures being restored as is...". Simply stated, the barn has clearly not be restored "as is." However, regardless of what "restored" means, the permitted use of the projected "accessory" apartment in a "lawfully" existing detached accessory barn, is again in direct opposition with key zoning sections of the ZBA Town Code criteria: (1).That the granting of the special exception will not adversely impact the privacy and use and enjoyment of any adjoining parcel. (2)That the granting of the special exception will not adversely impact the character of the neighborhood.in which it is located. (3) Whether adequate buffer yards and screening can and will be provided to protect adjacent properties from possible detrimental impacts of the proposed. Our larger, unaddressed concern is what precisely will that screening be i.e. mature trees? What will the finished wall look like i.e. stone facade? The answers to our on-going questions such as these come in slowly and gradually, if at all. It appears this piecemeal planning approach is strategic and continually leaves the community at a disadvantage who cannot in all actuality stay on top of all the repeatedly made changes leaving the owners of 95 Navy Street at an advantage to make modifications without the community's knowledge and left catching-up once again. Due to the continual public confusion over procedure, frequent resubmissions, and question of what agency (FEMA, HPC, and/or the ZBA) is ruling on the decisions, we suggest a revised, detailed and organized master plan submission for the project in its entirety with a similarly detailed and comprehensive impact statement to all surrounding properties, to once again be reviewed with public comment. Until so, most of the community will continue to be misinformed about the facts and confusion will persist as the status quo as will the common denominator of community distress. RECEIVED JUN 16 20,1 2ening Board of Appeals i Overall, there has been far too many complicated and changing variables in the 95 Navy Street project application process which not only presents as a formidable task to address here in this letter but to simply keep up with and maintain an operating handle on as an deeply concerned and impacted property owner. Every community member who has visited our property to try to understand the project, and there has been an untold amount, expresses disbelief over what they see. And while it feels unfortunate to be literally in the trenches next door, we appreciate the support and the concern it has engendered in the community. We greatly trust your thoughtful consideration for all the enormously concerned and actively involved Orient community voices who hope to protect the vitality of our historical village under your dedication and guidance to serve the Town and residents of Southold. respectfully mitted, RECEIVED r c rnstein JUN 15 2021 Marcia Sheldon Zoning Board of Appeals v ?""�'y :3p"tlfR`'y _ •s"- c'''� `� �'.' .�'N ,:o`� ,s''�� :•s^f'� � Mfr r.r-,,, � _ �rl� '�, ftri• '^'• i ire' ,p .. /' / � r.-' a d> ��,. - "p ','•B_q•u S �s f� '® .fr` ,t(✓� / A '`R`./�.�x"!< .c't�, �.� ___�.. � 1`^• y+ a y. vp P :•x��4�9tad~'. c' m' re .ca:: -.-, ?''r :. °�.. /�r'.� 'f ✓✓ .M- q..,'x � �F rr/ gd ®? / .t- '„i •-i- 1,/'—_�,J< G s' 1 ✓ 2 t'.� $ `3 k r'rvT.3W,A Ql�'r§•5. - G �T ;' * � w�b - � S 1. h� r. �� f,:� � ear z r� �I� �Ns�y�� 1 �� -� "5�y! • tt .r � ' y.. _ - `" r- ' r _-_a ` `� .''Ly.,,, r_n...; S�^ .t"�`- rt'•v x ✓r°c t.. ..�'.•*^' {- a ''q. Jr ,��S�'.t�-0�,4��.d^+„+:�i� .'1J� � '�r'.'i f'sja,Y.?•ti -.L",.;' •'� s''r _ a ..r r _ s �f ��-.r."e t - 'lj,� J. r .,�',fr�il .•� 9 �;ari r > � r: tir nly3y. ,� }rfr�,f�� /i I � �� _ / �r •'� 4.F,r°''�✓•f•`�� .Y"�i#r 'z-t � .3 t',ys `�'- y�� ; �� 4+- t?{ �w'V'_ /��•p'�;`^G ; Y-�rtil� r7• ��,.-� s.,;'" `4.u,s •'R'i j-r; M t � 3 p' <- : u $.R; L-`•. y�': +AL,.°'`t' � ", ,rC t��t� n 4 ' .3 t ,.+'t_ .�,�, .. e.d �,'"� i p�r. t/lek:• •'t {+�-�'�� ,r...4��.'a-•,�9 ` �� a a ✓A f �aIn kf r .n ;.IR �(•�d,' s >�` �'�{.I'� ' -,,C'0 '` 1�•-..,. '� � a 4a o-y..�,N ,,� �4"*�`r.�'t !.t y��+gu, .�` o.a ' _ �r �' �s-.� wl i' „�J�� /vsir �'T:�y ��•c�' / � �6 i' ii Par�°"tn t - •},^ l• ''s �.�'r''t -'tri•._Y -,}� A' ,�'i, �� _��t��. ,.• o `�`s'ir��. �� ' ��/ �, �r�4�r�t -ka � ,�.,i,CF +' rt,...r . -r '� ��1`�� ...Y 1- 'fi"'s�-'`f � /�� S• �,�} r•Z' �s t�� r' ��j -r� -* r' . AW- "tom., Mo4 Irl .r ,;%` ,' �9•,��e:' 1. �� •� �,'�: +� _ ',q ^ �T-- � ii�'+' -'.','•�^-� .�Ci"'y2a.> v � „�.p`� yt "'ii '�i�C.� '.'^ .y"'t, J 2 •si� ✓f., a-. 'r . s.ifav a4 � �Yrr.K' t /�'// 'aa �� to Jr�-. ...� .. y i i b• 6 �� .�_ '°' 'aim{ r i��" ��,� i c • / r'•,,c1•. yip! '� ,t '� �� .r�' �.. � 12' l''�`.l .�i .s %% °�'.� �y,4.ia �4.-,? 4>.. � '��ie� 4a"'k£ ��r �_ � a.`�s�,�2. �I a >`� ••�'<. _ ft is• r �.. - 1 ''z`ln�, � ^7 � ,P r�• /��..�� 4� do-! r � j�� tKx. ? �r ,, t -L�,�1�,'�' �y�i r. �'. r •� ,t per, t d 1 �~ �. .• `� �aq�'� �., v;• .I .4� `�. yam' .�� y��_�y�.3;/,� , �.. �''. � r`T:`^ � k - �J�"/�h SIS }��_L�;j ^a• .,i r�r� aVn L r::t \��+ J, )f i� '. +y�"r��•��17"•Y_ �r� j�;'f' � •—•-r ,* "'�R :. r 6{ •rte. � T111! ! J � _ _. r (�{ �'zz`erts�s+s CIL ut ME M. }{ _ e'" at,",t �,�ry us t,F3t y 5 SM RM Now s �"" seri='� U s� .Y "z� r� $ v�E '� _ �j r r�s -�' ,^• .'d. PAZ ': :. z '�'E<- c-•a"�" _ 1, +-�`�. �'�"-�. a�^.e-hcr:�c• �"�`�.�!' :J�� 'ae� G.rh_ -„�-a. __ r � J� s..w'z- ��..,t�`^'^�`�� e♦ :,$ d r .2,{ t,i .wr.., Or �srywy,; hr ;,-'`"rq 2t 4s�' Z rn ..rf 1•'� may,''*t4 ,,. f ! >' F ;, d` .�" e f� � "•� � "i a �r .' �� .� ,<.,�. yr,,,'-"i. �f-��'a• TM�tii•F,-y:' �� ,y� �,�� >�. �, .F„s a�'✓-, P',r ' �• _� - ,�.�'7�Q:�� g � �;�� <�� me:.�y�.�s=��., '° �sra..f, :"zws r �'•� ..-_ ./ `°F s, { s -•;,�-'�- j � =i,<� `zk,W€i't7Ff9"sE'8 iF f +�ry,'�+ am �r+��Fi�. � '. £+�"�; � / � , i-.h• ifJr�h-?'r G-tf,�wr'"r' `s'� ». a`-�� ! F.=t`'�: � ''fit - N elf ��'"•�rn.,'n, '^x rr(F �� z �. r ...- -�" r '� ':� .� tr'' •�— r� `tom` ....>,n •,.: j° � >• �rj'A ...•h k.7rss''.e s 't`r Y''vt" �.".,s'�"",.- tb r�� cfL '"S �- -J .wry 81 ' ... .. Rte. arxL.•s�� -+1^� '3s J iF t _ F .r-�;'�. '. ,.,.,� s,w•�yn, .,+.�' ,a per, �T .. 4 �" :r /. � � _ { '� '� 6ca� `9.33'��'Gs w• �rte; h _ iy f t �,x..S..�y r� •c r 1t r—.t 'a -: r a�-�a' z.�y'd \ ; M-0 Kyt i 4 C :Fu }'v fi .•�.." ��F>� � v �-"�,{F�/,�,.of _• 9 1 �.y1 „�=1.^N°Ly y„+•r- as'iFgCta}V.-'K}'��b,��i�.✓t�v""».a„`�,#''"•��'a.,..� 3..•y `.x._. Y. �, .` GC: *tr °t,. �, -�°�yr` fi�rr -h`.v sr i l �sz` '�"' r,Tc-e.c._ `"'l� '},. *.'L +r;ti� '^- :,�'•' ,s. i 7K yx ... Pf ^u .a`r^a ::,�,3•a.... �. ��y�.�`v. -� x::H r y �z�..a X44 �\v- z L{-rrt �..��,��t'�3"�t�~-�� 'r. ",��".s tr'. ' : ry+a•Xr > y r.a>. .y�,,�Ks -L ro3•J" 3„ �.VA r tt,/ a p'"v'' .+.,,, •� ,.c a& •., c . r f}� � ,� 3a's,�' �" .:3 y`��-`t',�i ..r�>`t? •r r �^xtrd,-., -s rcr: c� "�., .._"_�,,��++'4�*��t�r�'GA c r _ •� ur' � 'Ss3 >' �r .8' F+�. r�y..wk l"�• �j� r- L r"'-_ � aa. '�'ti'» - z"'Sam l 'c„ja.:'zo. r`� °,y r `` 4 Z iry *;�. l -r a•°' 'Alas' s w 4 G, ;ro ��aR► ''i„ .. ow <r r �,._ °��„��s r:� r r�`t>'�y r vaFC �.a >w> 'x-s"*' h �"`r� .�s -�e�..� `�k,�•a'�c�\�� 6.. ' a s 4 K S T " rh rg K�Tti q r � Z a .Zz '3..4'tfi q!k _• },��z .07-x° "`,�' J f '.r.:eye�"„fxz..y..l„ .y�_i.,n c._i .�'' i f- f td. ,. f ,rte`` Y�,,5'-. • a. - }. ' 1 S y9t� '.y r.•L� w �' �' < v t>' ti> a- t t l J -` ->�, l*r t 4�- ?+.. 4 < -••,,tom � q`` i...r �_ r t' r Ll ate v J 3 s a a iz .J 'r�. +*�� r�� *� ,�,,,,,,, I+; �.t>� �f rx„L •�. <, t -.�.>' ...: i, r l"'J fJf;`• .t� 7w 'v.: tr •zi` `LI rYt:4E-r '� '"R -�'° k ` =3 J a t ., -,f,,' d_}_ 1` v 4 ��s -s✓x r r .�. s^. f}'`.rtt�•s i a ,lc aa.F L '- .�, T :�tj � _-'�'^,�N+. r�rc r t� s° 1,5�^. •�� x �-r�s �`..ti��?�.s'` t '`x t.'��'.fr' i 9','rsr 't !. •a. c�t3� y- `� rc t J r � ,�+ '>'1 '� s <�- •t�`�.�.+ -�i� ? ..5. i x; tt, P... �}r �_i-- r•.� �'4 .,,i > i ^'"i.�, -� ��i�r ..p� 3;N `r nz �.t �'Y .rc- =' � � k v c�Yx=4�T�� '�','.�•.."r�z'z'ti�iy�f �'�'`°�,N?'�'xr'`r"4�� - ir,.z.7n''� -,3 9 "?'�f5..� �!x'��..:`'ae::s . •A s Ak rx'..� ✓r 1 I s f�^'y "kr'Ris 'c.cR:` t H Z,� s . - .. y ,# .r�.,ar-''r r - 4rp,�Y(t5 `k' x'SSr�'�43`e”-< s3 "-:,r'` ti jL #s' �n�.' <+;` »_ " 4. � v &�" fi r x '.---„n,.i, � c-F'tl '•,�-,.� e ",r, )s '% '>n r-3•�r:h k�. C- . r eF - ...,r��'a ”' :'c 2v+•`?,'.x rTe.:.. fi -,.:+r Ory 'r�{. �{s'-;1.. t f..:..v, 5 a fit: r ,.;� �. �� Svz..c�• -n: mt� yF,,-Y`„k iJ-y�c. •e.ri4 i N. f �':`�•ft'1�,,, .arm t A ��.g�i.�, r a'�. ko 4^- �5�"'�� ;..vX�< yd.},�. �y -znL"`••�, ' P/^.,4 1:: � L4} i. 1, yy+•,.,y -ti.� 't� b' 1 K� 1 k v M� '3'�.4Ufyt•.Z N� h '"}: }"_..9 J+ k-i.*+�. Aa= 3-'a ^ter ,...., +t� � t '� r � s v �..�ti x„ ^aa• - yA t .g x ,"r. _ S-.:-- ",. �r ^•a ,r<-mac,;;�. V'2 ^'-"�_. R 'c•r , � ay rs �' ton S 4 �..' i� "s` C rw 7 �'Cix ✓ �� ev ,.y t f� 'fir-t'S��- _ •r'�.' r ,s'E'� -+1 r s .. ""-' a x c 'r•,1 < t +v `-�"'-r�. "r ` 1 -.r r o ^• P�..� f`r +k.�r xJ.<',-" ,,�� r°,,.,�� Y �. -sz 3 r<" ��'t2t-� t ♦ .�,s,F.� Fr^ti � '3� !max r c ''F� ! - •, .r.�. , f 7 •Lv .,r fl t - . .- -, < t >}t e �� q. f � 'L.U'c k 4�,; � t' -tr �"'' zJk•...F r i r ': dl y:. 4• "� r� r �rT/ F > '� Y4 'v.s':"3 Y , _ ai+ -� t r y. *�� > t k .'' '.t P I r t a�-v-.,r .t }'-. �� ss 'moi;^ �1... ._.� �y�• ti y'` �'`y,}a r"_,t fr�c > to:�lti.��ri ala -s- e..�,`T�x.'F 4'S.F�f�`iS <s��`�¢��Y� `"A•-. .,'„s�4+ . ..,i�yy�� .,fid. sr i r�. � � ter 4 G-,• ,� ��'.�R.- .,,�Via. t �� -. qtr_ IN r. N--21 �c^ . �i5� .. ,. :,, i�'•ck"w c �" ^?�"r#r�t� y t, j `NPI ' k',� .^� y.... < %� _ y'�1 i N�aYk£,,,��3yv, i �`t' � -•. x� X �A�, '.. '� � � � 1 t`.i y ei Y 5��.�'� +r� +S"�t7x� ]. +� s-•4y`,�j '4 4-a.. �yL..,.i� '? 't'. t'•'-. .•✓. � e Z+ i �-u'ra..r4!4a a 'u` �v a n r++��c y,, '�t• '�•� �. --€ ' �" .�- -�'.+-£ 'rte'" '�"�-vet°^ '-• �re n5ti° 1 ! `-r A i..•;-� �� ..ai.,,,a}a'` re�'S"'a'�"'v��_ Y��. �`� �e' '�£"'?^:.ri '• 1� .4 +� az .� yw `t §st '...s- .4^�,4�;�Pj*,-Yom.,," �.,�.,�. hts,`. '�-_-.✓' � a�'s�xt`�»g,'�+^ f v .e., .-' - .F � e. �'Ps'i '.�ti','•.� i"€s �.1C '• "`-.� yµ'3 .. ,T> €-:s:.^sz'°fi'+�� '`. �s-';i•,Wa ( �.+-u.''�+ '.. 'hV:' ,rk�i`SY �. kk .� n � »•t ^+ate �a�s� �^ s _ r � ITwA q S:`+y;. �"' .1`l�,�'Sa � 1 ati'-a '":!� -. d f S"'�»` '-� c ..� "€-_ J 1 a ti �Nr 2U1 f'� e' g t r ; �� k, a, # to ti r f3 j of `\pPeal$ i .,_a. "d 4,•� ::4 �+''".v`'Z' -��'''s T ss�..��+'�� `�€n '-.�`.��}a,s'' `i ,YSF,,. �.t. +l "> �,,j J., _ _ _.. � � 1•'- .1` , `. .�'�•�.�� r d Vi,µ a;`y�,.vr� '<"�.r. M. �"� W, `��'-- ,�s: t_. -. �`®, :�.�, �, \_-- a.z,,y-,,�7,�,'.�r� '-�1�°z�� -'£`��i`.•,a":r�4sv.`� r�, y `,L "�' �"� 'S.-� - z_{r,.. { ry ;, ^-.•:}ins'` i'1ikk^'` c?;y:'' I Jeri Woodhouse AN 14.2021 825 Village Lane Orient; NY 11957 °=------------- 631=834-1816 June 15, 2021 - Ji1fU � 'F Zoni g--Board"of Appeals ZQ2�; Leslie V1leisma' iQAir Town Hall Annex Building s Southold, NY 11971 RE. ZBA•Application for 95 Navy Street Dear Ms,Weisman arid`ZBA°Board Members; I havd beeh a resident of°Orient.for 33 years and am-very familiar with`the=Navy St property. Originally it was`part of.a largerparcel that my husband and I oWned: which encompassed the House aid Garage on the:corrier ofNavy Streefand Village Lane where`W' Jivedfull=time, and--tlie cottage and-barn:=next'doorWhich We used: seasonedh .:. y� In 2004 W.e apphed`to.the Planning Board for permission to sub=divide the '' pro e' W'e worked=cIosel' viiitl the Plarinin Board=and&Suffolk C-iin "` Heal'th P .�3'• 3'' g ty= Department; acid eonsiited°with the.Historic Preservation Gonmittee to protect the historic cottag`d i"arn :. .... ,In.200,5 we received permission to sub-dividethe:property. As.a.condition"of:the subdivision the Suffolk CountyDepartrrient of Health SE: icesa` .[Division of Environmental Quality-Board onant 'f Review) conditioned that"a cove ,. shall be provided,in language acceptable to the County Attorney,thauthe approved lots shall not be further subdivided and each lot be limited to one single family residence only with accessory uses as may be approved by the Town of Southold. They:stated.that the need for.the.coverrant is referenced in the property transfer deed to the applicant In discussion we were told that in addition to no more buildings. ,n more Wells could'be added without Health Department = consultation/approval,,and-none co iTd be n'the rear right°corner:�lose to the former Gesell property- Before closing on the sale of the cottage and barn I consulted both,With Jim G'rathwold about protecting the'cottage` facade of this historic structure and the Peconic Land Trust about language to be inserted into the deed for a facade easement which I wanted recorded with the deed. As you can surmise,preserving the Historic District and Historic Structures in Orient is very important to me. Even more important is protecting our fragile aquifer and water supply. Both are being severely compromised in the application before you. Let me corri`ment first that it is almost impossible to comprehend what is going on with this application. Accurate information is.difficult to come by. There are two fronts to this property- meetings are.only being noticed on one. Information that is needed for the public to understand what is going on has not been readily available, not posted in a timely manner,not accurate.from plan to plan,or inconsistent. The barn is a topic of concern and ramps are being discussed while:the barn itself remains under wraps with no way of.knowing what has been removed.-or added, and the only visual does not include a finished "wall'. Let me suggest that the plans are not necessarily helpful to-figuring out was is going on- I would like to,encourage you to request a_3D:;rendering ofthe-entire;p:arcel And that the existing and.proposed lot coverage be also provided. As for the 3 parking spaces,it makes no sense to have a113 ;on one side=of the property and create a potential dangerous situation for the neighbors on Willow Terrace who.have•.prgl? erns-parking as itis..0f particular;concern is.the effect on..., the Fire Department and maneuvering their trucks inan emergency There are;other.options for the applicant to consider.iincluding moving two spaces to Navy Street ,Sde.,;reducing;orrmovmgche garden.and havmg:a_2 car:parking space to the right of the property facing the back. (As opposed to one space.on the. left of the house close to the.neighbor), Moving,the:parking-from the front:of the barn also protects the -ill ow-Tree;that is such-an:importantpart. of;the.neighborhood Whrlertis;almostmpossible.to.fix what has already been destroyed,,anything that can.be saved,-should be;saved: It is our heritage,and how we respond to this application will forever,define-our future. Ve truly yours, J <1 Woodhouse PS. I had an opportunity to read:the comments submitted;by Tim Frost and Ellen McNeely, an1.d I concur with their observations and recommendations..-In closing, . The house which always-referred,to.as the.Pernchie'Kottage,is a seasonal residence: It is not habitable as:a.permanent residence and,has not been.-used.as such. . Fuentes, Kim From: Laura Weil <laura.weil@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 8:36 AM To: Fuentes, Kim ' Cc: EJ Camp '' I y�,g Subject: 95 Navy Street, Orient NY- Please Remediate!! L��V Dear Ms. Fuentes, As a long time resident of Orient, owning 2760 Village Lane since 2004, 1 am writing to protes nstruction disaster that is ongoing at 95 Navy Street. It appears to be a ridiculous folly of a plan, with high concrete walls,trenches, elevated ramps for parking and the ever present destruction of beautiful, historic trees that define this once charming area of Orient. It should be stopped,the owners should be fined and ordered to remove the walls and trenches that threaten not only the beauty of this address, but more importantly,the drainage and septic stability of the area. It is'inconceivable that the owners of this property.could get this ridiculous, ugly and dangerous plan past our Zoning Board and Historic Preservation organizations.Why is it ok to destroy historic trees, build concrete walls, plan parking ramps and dig trenches in the historic town of Orient? How can this project be allowed to continue? It is so disturbing to think of my-neighbors whose houses-are next to this mess.They must watch this monstrosity of project grinding through in its aimless, disorganized and ultimately, destructive fashion. lAnow you and the other members of the board work diligently to enforce our zoning regulations so I am appealing to you to do Whatever you can do to stop this project and order the residents to return the property to its original condition. Respectfully, Laura Weil 2760 Village Lane Orient, New York ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. Timothy T Frost B ayhonse 1995 Village Lane Orient,New York 11957 ,WKS& 16 June 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building Southold, New York -BY HAND DRQ;P.BQX -Re ZBA Aplatications for 95 Navy Street.in Orient Chairperson Weisman and Fellow Board Members: . I am.,a'35-year resident of Orient Village and the owner of 1995 and 21.94 Village Lane. Both properties are near the Applicant's property, and-my permanent residence (1995 Village Lane) is within the sightline of his barn'and Willow Street frontage. This letter is written int response. to the-Applicant's attorney's letter of 11.June and the submissions of revised pians.It is also written based upon a more thorowgh.to lew,of the ZDA Laser-fiche which has grown from 7 Ontries to 19 entries:in the wake of the 3 June-public hearing. I believe it important to review:the�Applicant's initiai filing"Bertault 7468SE Special Exception Application—Accessory Apartment"on the ZBA's Laserfiche considering his attorney's categorization as to what he suggests is"relevant"and"not relevant"..As I learned as a child, claiming it's so; doesn't make it so". For my part; I would suggest what are materially potential: errors, omissions, misstatements and misrepresentations in the'Applicant's file should be particularly relevant and`require further disclosure and review.Several have:been noted in my previous letters of 10 and 14 June;but bear repeating considering the Applicant's attorney's - claim.as to relevance.Several are based.on the Applicant's new and incomplete plans:filed on June 101x'. 1 call your attention but to some.of the more egregious examples. "Bertault 7468SE Special Exception Application —Accessory Apartment*' �. Interference With Use of, Enjoyment,-or Privacy of Adjoining Parcels; In Sections C. (4),the Applicant alleges that the location of the proposed apartment`would not Frost Letter—Final Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 16 June 2021 �. interfere with the use of, enjoyment,or privacy of any adjoining parcel".-I am not the owner of an adjoining parcel and adjacent owners may offer comments If they chose,to. But, I am incredulous in the wake of an allegation that lacks credibility In Sectio6-t-(6), the Applicant alleges that "there will be no cumulative adverse impacts on the surrounding neighborhood as a result of granting this application". I am an owner in the 1_ 'tmrnediate neighborhood with sightline of the Applicant's property:So, let me be real; I am incredulous in the wake of another allegation that lacks credibility. In Jight of the - -Applicant's newly submitted revised pians, i restate, reaffirm, and respectfully ask you to reconsider what were my final comments in my:14 June submission relating to both. `ZBA variance applications: `Will the variances requested produce an undesirable change.to the character of the neighborhood?Let's face it undesirable chaingev have already occurred with the destruction of mature trees and introduction of tall masonry wallsand'.. fences.:The addition of a second home,with improperly screened front-yard pool and the expansion of the parch,would only add.further insult to injury. What's clone is done, and what once was awapproximate erne acre lot with`a perrri'anerifresidence,seasonal dweiling, and barn has riow morpj ed an'd,<on a tatof less than half its former size, is now proposed.by the Applicant to include: . i ) a_perman:ent residence, ii ) a barn/garage with an.accessory apartment; iii,)a. aal,=and;iv ari accessary(cabana structure:Thi&re resents a .intensification p,: ) ) p. of use that overwhelms the site. In its deliberations, I have faith that the ZBA will fully consider the Applicant's proposal corisidering,the specific findings and dete t-ninations.regluired by tine `.'Use Regulations"set forth in 280-13 B. (13) (k)of the Town'Code.Specifically, for rnany of the reasons stated in these comments"and those of-adjacent landowners and neighbors, I trust,take comfort, and do not believe the ZBA can objectively make the following specific positive determinations required by the Town Code with respect to the Applicant's current proposal: 0 280-13 B. (13) (k) [1] ... that it"will not adversely impact the privacy and use and enjoyment of any adjoining parcel". 0 280-13 B. (13) (k),[2] ...that it"will not adversely impact the character of the neighborhood in which it is located". a 280-13 B. (13) (k) [3] ...that it"will not have a cumulative adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood". 2 Frost Letter—Final Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 16 June 2021 /►(�Q ® 280-13 B. (13) (k) [5] ... "that sufficient off-street parking exists on the subject property to accommodate the proposed.accessory apartment". © 280-13 B. (13) (k) [6] ... "whether adequate buffer yards and screening can and will be provided to protect adjacent properties from possible detrimental impacts of the proposed use". ' 2. No Attached Sheet and Explanation 0 Changes to Land Contours,as required: In Section B. of the Questionnaire for Filing,with your_ZBA Application,the Applicant . indicates there will be changes.to,the.land contours but doe's not provide a required "attached sheet"to elaborate.and "explain", as also requ-Jred.Since the Appl cant plans ' propose significantly g g p property,, ro ose si nificantl raisin the rade u to four feet on several areas of his, I would suggest this material omission is both relevant and indicative of the Applicant's propensity to attempt to mislead the ZBA and the public. 3. Certificate of Occupancy is fora "Seasonal D..welling" the Applicant includes a y` Certificate of Crcciapancy(CoO. Z-3098.2)for what he claims to have been lis' "permanent residence". The Coo clearly sets forth that.the existing residence_ is.a "Seasonal Dwelling"and the entry under"Type Heat" is"None". In addition, in the ZBA application he also provides a rrotarited affidavit in which he, "being dulysworn, deposes,says"; states "I.have resided at.the Premises a's my primary residence for the past-ten years":As-the existing.house.is an unheated seasonai dwelling, it is simply not- credible to accept that the existing house:has been his primary residence for the past ten years. Furthermore;the Applicant,includes in his ZBA filing.a copy of his.PSBG electric bill showing extremely limited usage over_a thirteen-month period. Finally, in apparent support of his permanent residency claim,the Applicant includes a "doctored". cover page of what I assume we are expected to infer is his purported 1040 Tax Return for 2019. The logical question that arises from this potential charade is this Should the Applicant even be permitted to app..1y for an accessory apartment before the existing house(i.e.,the"Seasonal Dwelling") has a-CoO as a p'ermor en=t residence si.nce:full-time residency is a requirement foram accessory apartment. 4. Errors and Omissions to Appendix B (Short Environmental Assessment f=orm)_: In fart 1 (3.b),the Applicant states that"the total acreage to be physically disturbed" is":a5 acres" (approximately 10%of the lot). In Part 1 (6),the Applicant states"the proposed action,is consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape". in Part 1(12.b),the Applicant falsely indicates,"the site dues not.contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Regiister'of Historic Places, Even a cursory glance at the Applicant's site plan and any awareness of the Orient Historic- District istoricDistrict reveals the nature of the misstatements and misleading responses by the Applicant. 3 Frost Letter—Final Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 16 June 2021 "Bertault— Documents received from Bressler 6-11-2021" As noted above,the Applicant's attorney attempts to categorize ongoing public comment as "relevant" or"irrelevant". I would suggest this is a specious argument and a blatant attempt to limit and dismiss public discussion and input. 1-believe public input should be encouraged, accepted and considered for as lorig as the.hearing and record is open for public comment.i would also suggest this is`especially irriportantsince the Applicant's plans are subject to-last minute.change and modification such,as those now proposed. ' The Applicant's attorney dismisses the feasibility.of moving the dwelling to be in compliance with Town Code.As we all.Know, many structures, in far worse condition have been.moved,.far greater-distance, over significantly rougher terrain, without damage and adverse consequences. In all likelihoodthe primary risk of damage,to the structure is from the initial'lifting of the. structure; root from the minimal transport distance over currently:level ground to a more code- compliarit location on the property. With respect to the.Applicant's attorney's statement regarding the proposed pool, l have addressed my concerns in my letter of 141une.and, in the interests of time and brevity;will direct your attentiori to them and not.restate them:h.e_re. However, 1 take extreme exception to the Applicant's attorney's claim that"the application ' now:meets the requirements of-the Towin Cade because the Applicant has determined to relocate, in part,the parking to address the concerns of the Z&A". Presumably,such a claim is based ori the e 'xhibit's submitter!withhis letter. In this instance, Exhibit A is troy cif no :- relevance to the discussion as it is outdated and are plans last modified in 2014 as part of the HKapplication for a CoA: .xhjbiit.B is at least'relevant.m that it is a 6.10.2'021 modified planbut I have-not had time to.thoroughlyrevlew. Exhibit C,which the Applicant's attorney purports to be a site pian; rdise.s.a°minefield of concerns/questions on the newly proposed modifications that require a more.detailed:analysis and review. Let me list'but'a few concerns/questions.that immediately come to mind: ® Rather than providing two parking spaces on the proposed 16.32%grade driveway, the riew.plan proposes two separate replacement parking spaces= Frost Letter—Final Comments ZBA Applications—95 Navy 16 June 2021. 1 grade!,—a drop of four feet-over an approximate four feet(a 45--degree incline!) given that this transition is required.as the parking space is contiguous with.-the driveway ramp,What this suggests to me is the obvious need to fully understand the proposed contour and hydrology results of these newly proposed modifications. . o To accommodate the new northwest parking space,the revised site plan also proposes a new stairway,wall and gate to provide access to the property.These modifications,.which appear awkward and cumbersome at best, would be visible from the street and should-require,and be conditioned on, HPC review and issuance, of a CoA: The revised siteplan provides no detail or even outline regarding the ramped driveway; (Le.,Has the driveway been modified?;What is-the trartisit on from the driveway to:th.e flat surface of the northwest parking space? etc:). I could goon at length, but time is short;so, although my analysis is incomplete,and I have many additional'comments;I need to cut Myself of and submit this letter-asJS. But, if.somehciv the ZBA were to grant variances for the currently proposed hour-e, pooland/or accessoryapartment, I respectfully request ZBA consideration that no worlr be permitted.to `proceed:until a master plan incl.uding.All relevant proposed improvements is granted_a Certificate of Appropriateness by the HPC and approved by the various other Town agencies aril the Suffolk County Department of Health Services:The existing piecemeal approech-has. only exacerbated the problem for all concerned. In addition,with-the continued addition of amended plans to the Zl3A Laserfiche, if the hearing is"Closed", I would.also respectfully request ZBA consideration that the record be kept"open"so that additional public comment can be submitted prior-to ZBA rendering a decision. In closing; whatever your decision, I Want to thank you for.both your thoughtful consideration of this matter and your dedicated service to the Town and residents of Southold. Sincerely, /s/Timothy T Frost /ttf 5 t�n .aFCFj+��l` OCT p, 2 aodr� LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER&GEASA,P.C. 13015.MAIN ROAD,P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIA&f WICKHAM(06-02) MAT"TITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11,952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565 ebress.ler@wbglawyers.com v„� October 6,2021 Southold Town Zoning Board of AppealsN 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Re: Variance Appeal No. 7467 and Special.Exception No.7468SE, Property owned by Applicant Vincent Bertault 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York SCTM# 100.0-26-1-12.2 Ladies and Gentlemen: We are the attorneys for the Applicant and write in response to the multitude of letters received by the Zoning Board of Appeals; ("ZBA"), immediately prior to and since the last public hearing. As has been the case with the prior public hearings and the prior correspondence,the latest communications are almost entirely irrelevant to the issues before the ZBA,but, rather, ad hominem attacks on the Applicant. Nonetheless,we address, infra, six of the common areas of complaint/comment. A. Length of the Process The length of the process has been dictated by the Historic Preservation Commission and the ZBA. Between these two agencies, aggravated by the continuing neighbor complaints and intervention, approximately 15 months have elapsed without'the Applicant being able to effectively move forward. This far exceeds typical time frames. B. The Condition of the Applicant's Property. The present condition of the Applicant's property is a result of the failure to promptly process applications and actual interferences in Applicant's approved work. If the variance with respect to the porch is granted,work on what some have described as a run-down cottage can proceed. Work on the storm water management plan and sanitary system can becompleted once the ZBA makes a determination. At that time thework can be completed and,piles of dirt backfilled, and the area finally re-graded in accordance with the approved plan. The longer the process takes,the longer before work can be completed. �R C. Parkin The ZBA has received an amended parking plan which meets the concerns of the ZBA. The ramp to the barn was previously approved in 2014 by all relevant agencies. D. The Porch Variance The only comment with respect to the variance request concerning the porch is that, in the opinion of the commenter, "it serves no purpose". This is not an acceptable basis for denial. In fact;the porch serves the important purpose of providing outdoor seating farther. from Navy Street, shade from afternoon sun, and access to the garden and is compatible with the Orient hamlet atmosphere. E. Configuration of the Accessory Apartment The issue before the ZBA is the use of a portion of the first floor of the barn for an accessory apartment. Thus,the lay=out of the proposed apartment is irrelevant; as,is the means of access to the second floor. These are matters for the Building Department,not the.ZBA. F. The Pool The only comment with respect to the variance request concerning the swimming pool is that it should be screened to the west from view. The Applicant has already agreed to provide screening. G. Conclusion These applications have been subject to much obstruction, delay,interference, and irrelevant objections. These reasons are not valid reasons to delay either variance application.,There is-now no need for a.variance in connection with.the special exception as all of the conditions for a special exception have been met. There is no reason to deny same, As the ZBA is well aware, there are numerous accessory apartments throughout Southold Town, and, indeed, in Orient. That the Applicant sought to legally obtain such an improvement is something to be respected rather than attacked. We urge the ZBA to approve the applications. We thank the ZBA for its attention to these applications. Verr. 1ressler ours, Eric EJB/cs cc— VlncenttBe•tault To: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 1011 From: Fredrica Wachsberger Re: Vincent Bertault application#7467 This is the second recent attempt at an inappropriate incursion into Orient's historic '„ district. In the first instance, a house on Skipper's Lane, no destruction had taken?place, and the issue was satisfactorily resolved, with great effort, I may say, by the comm nityr� C'O�� An appropriate renovation of the property is now taking place. o,� .. y Here we face a different problem, which is the implementation of a plan that is entirely alien to the historic landscape, and which is being implemented without proper approvals by the Town departments and without the community input that is expressly required by Town legislation. The resolution of this particular issue will create a precedent for future, inevitable attempts to disregard the essence and the details of the Town's Historic District legislation. I believe we are at a watershed moment with extremely high stakes for the future, not only of Orient's Historic District but of historic districts throughout the Town. Permitting the implementation of this plan would mean the end, in my opinion, of any reliable protection of the historic districts. Issues like the relative importance of preserving the historic character of the district versus the potential impact of rising water levels, an issue introduced in this application, should be a subject of Town and community discussion and agreement rather than left to ad hoc individual board decisions. This particular application represents a gross transformation of an emotionally moving relic of"old Orient" into something unrecognizable in any historic district in Town, and the swiftness of the execution of this design before the acquisition of the necessary approvals by the Town and expressly against the wishes of the community now will call into question the willingness of the Town to enforce its own legislation. The Town must insist on the reversal of work that has been done without proper permission from the relative agencies, including and especially demanding the removal of the wall, which has been built without prior approvals and represents the most egregious incursion into the historic landscape. (I have been at meetings of the HPC where the exact nature of wooden pickets was discussed--let alone a wall!) The integrity of historic districts and the balance between historical realities and contemporary living requirements clearly needs to be the subject of serious community discussion and collective agreement, and there must be clear guidelines given to realtors to share with potential buyers as to what will be considered permissible. The resolution of this particular incursion into the Orient Historic District should become an example of the Town's commitment to preserve the historic relics of our Southold communities, and not an invitation to future buyers to destroy them. i �W �ac erg C)_3 9/S-0 0RQfM2-b G 31 Z7� AcLuk1--- I am Charles Dean,living full time in the Orient Historic District at 295 Village Lane. While Mr. Bertault's property at 95 Navy Street is a few blocks from my house, I am here to request that the ZBA recognize that this property is in Orient's Historic District and that your board act accordingly. Had this property been outside of the district,there would unlikely be such an uproar in Orient about Mr. Bertault's plan. The Historic Preservation Commission has notified in a letter to Ms.Weisman,as chair, and to the members of the ZBA,that the applicant is not in compliance with the HPC's Certificate of Appropriateness for the barn. The roof is several fee(over the approved height,the proposed doors are not a single barn door, and then concrete wall has no Certificate of Appropriateness. The HPC is charged`W�itt,- O® approving changes to the structures in the Historic District,but the applicant h�a , ignored the agreements that allowed the barn to be moved. I firmly believe that ffq, variances of any kind should be issued for 95 Navy Street until the proposed plan,is�' I in compliance with the 2014 agreement. I see no other way to ensure that the HPC�s�� decisions concerning this property are followed. As far as I know,they have no s enforcement mechanism of their own. The HPC did not mention the issue of the use of the second floor of the barn since internal construction is not in their purview. But one might assume that the roof was raised to allow sufficient ceiling height for a living space. With stairs to the second floor,the ground floor accessory apartment becomes a large two-story rather grand house. The ZBA should not issue a variance for this construction until the roofline is lowered to the approved height, and the plans changed so that a dropped ladder is the access to the attic storage area. Otherwise,the "storage" area will be storing a sofa, chairs, a TV,and whatever else to make the salon floor comfortable. The most egregious flaunting of the town's rules is the construction of an entirely inappropriate four-foot concrete wall enclosing a significant portion of the property. The HPC does have to approve fences and walls in the Historic District,and they have not issued a Certificate of Appropriateness for the wall, and it is unlikely that they would issue such a certificate. Unfortunately, the wall has been practically completed in a rush before the Stop Work Order was issued. This wall must be removed. If allowed to stand,it will transform what was a quaint section of the Historic District into something so modern—a raised oasis with a cabana, pool,and an extra guesthouse--that the district will be forever damaged. Raising the ground level several feet and the roof-line of the barn several feet has created a monster building out of scale to the neighborhood over which it will lord. The ground should be returned to the proper level and the barn's roofline lowered. Allowing this applicant to flaunt the rules of our town and then be offered "forgiveness"is a sure way to guarantee that the Historic District is doomed. Thank you for your time and your service to our community. Charles Dean y LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER& GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD,P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565 ebressler@wbglawyers.com RECEM March 10, 2021 MAR 2021 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals lbnIng BMrd Of APMb 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Re: Appeal No. 7467 and Appeal No. 7468SE Property owned by Vincent Bertault("Applicant") 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 Ladies and Gentlemen: We are the attorneys for the Applicant and write in response to the Boards' March 4, 2021 request for additional information concerning the applications. Accordingly, we enclose(a) 8 copies of the approved grading and drainage plan for the property , (b) 8 copies of the decision of the Historic Preservation Commission, ("HPC") dated both December 17, 2020 and January 4, 2021, (c) 8 copies of the notice of appeal from the decision of the HPC (without exhibits), (d) 8 copies of an affidavit from the Applicant as to the secondary occupant of the accessory apartment, (e) 8 copies of documents reflecting additional charges of house mover for moving rather than simply raising house; and(f) 8 copies of letter from owner of 320 East 181" Street,New York,NY. We further write in response to the comments of the Board concerning.the feasibility, risks, and expense of moving the entire house rather than simply raising it, as planned. Moving the house rather than simply raising it would involve the following adverse effects which preclude its consideration as an alternative to the relief requested: (a) Added expense of moving of approximately $30,000.00; (b) Added risk of moving including damage to the 150-year-old structure, especially the original masonry chimney; (c) Added expense of a new foundation; (d) Added expense of installation/relocation of and connection to water, electrical, gas, and sewage; (e) Added expense of moving HVAC system; (f) Loss of spacing between the structures on the property creating a constricted area behind the house. Moreover, this area is subject to frequent water incursion from the higher adjoining property to the east. We anticipate delivering professional opinions concerning the additional expenses and risk of moving the house. However, in order to provide the Board as much information as quickly as possible, we will be providing same under separate cover as when received. We will be pleased to respond to further questions at the special meeting on March 18, 2021. Thank you for your attention to this matter. EIDE® Very trul ours, .A�k7 I'l 2021 h9 BvaW Of Appe4!j Eric J. ssler EJB/es Encls. 7 LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER& GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD,P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565 ebressler@wbglawyers.com March 11, 2021 7*7 746 MqR � 1 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 2021 53095 Main Road nin P.O. Box 1179 9 Qpard OFgppeals Southold,New York 11971-0959 Re: Appeal No. 7467 and Appeal No. 7468SE Property owned by Vincent Bertault("Applicant") 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 Ladies and Gentlemen: We are the attorneys for the Applicant and write in furtherance of our letter of March 10, 2021 regarding this matter. We enclose 8 copies of letter dated March 11, 2021 from Joseph Fischetti, Structural Engineer, as to the inadvisability, probable damage, and costs of moving the structure rather than raising and lowering it. We therefore believe that movement of the structure is not a feasible or reasonable alternative. We also enclose copy of e-mail chain dated January 12, 2021 from Damon Rallis, Southold Town Building Department Inspector,to Gary O'Connor, Architect,providing approval of the Grading and Drainage Plan by the Building Department. Thank you for your consideration of this material. Very truly yours, Eri lier EJBIcs Encls cc— Vincent Bertault. FOP -r March':11,2021 Eric Bressler,Esq: ; f r Wickham,Bressler Geasa 13015 Main Road ` Mattituck,NY 11952 rt 5.1 ;1 ti 1. f .q p• (.L t, RE: 85 Navy Street, Orient,NY ~ Dear Mr.Bressler �f I inspected the above referenced'structure.on March 10,,2021 to evaluate it regarding moving the structure:You must be cautious when proposing to move an early 19�h century building such as this.These homes were constructed withstructural members:that today would be considered undersized. Without municipal oversightconstructton protocols were based on how good the lead carpenter was:. . Lifting a home in place and bringing it Back-dowq generates no unusual forces on the, structure.The forces are in line wrth gravity: Moving a home can cause'vibratonal'forces and possibly torsional forces that act on the fragile.structure�Solid�:parts of the building such as plaster and'masonry flues could begreatly;affected by these'forces. Connections between hidden structural members could be compromised and fiinseen. This home has a unique_structural feature.There.is 42nd floor-dormer in the front of the home that extends;over.the porch that has no supports from belgw The 2nd floor was extended out from the first-floor walls without visible support"The floor Iolsts on<the 2na floor are not Cantilevered because the floor joists span in thetother direction 3 I have seen older structures such as this where the carpenters used steel rods for support Inspecting this dormer,I find this.must be the'case but it has been hidden from view f I do not know what the forces moving the home will have.oni this nriique'architectural' feature.Moving could cause it irreparable damage. BOARD CERTIFIED IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING .JOSEPH( FISCHETTI.COM FISCHETTIENGINEERINO.CCM 63 1 -765-2954 1 72 5 H O B A R T ROAD S O U T H O L D , N E w YORK 1 1 97 1 Page 1 i FIL o .. I. G KrI 7 x t + } 4 V MSi+iaxnn sxwwwv .d .-.!y 7 >* A ; t t a . z J, 1 The costs to;move a structure from an existing'foundation to'a different location Increase greatly from keeping the existing location,Lifting and replacing a home m`the same a` location for a small,house.can cost about$20,000 00 >To `move that same house the cost' could be more than double.in the$50,000 00 ;' Existing utilities can be reinstalled in the samey'locationwhiie moving a building requires the costly exteh'sion'of those utilities.The newlocation:requireds=new excavation"for.the ,, new foundat on'and the backfilling of the existingrlocation.New landscaping will also be required:' BOARD CERTIFIED iN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING JOSEPH@FIS*CHETTI.COM FISCHETTIENGINEERING.COM 63 1 -765-2954 1 725 HOBART ROAD SOLITHOLD , NEW YORK 1 1 97 1 Page 2 E t . � z iE N ' 1 IV E ER`1 :� 13 -{ r t k < t � e f s ,b A e b _ S e fi r r t > ki 1 7 BOARD CERTIFIED IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING JDSEFHgQ FISCHETTI.COM FISCHETTIENGiNE$RINO.COM 631 -765-2954 1 725 HDB.ART ROAD SOUTH OLD , NI-W YORK 1 1 97 1 Page 3 LAW OFFICES WICKHAM,BRESSLER& GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD,P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565 ebressler@wbglawyers.com HAND DELIVERY March 17, 2021 RE( � Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road MAR j ? ZOZ1 P.O. Box 1179 p Southold,New York 11971-0959 9 Boa Of Appeals Re: Appeal No. 7467 and Appeal No. 7468SE Property owned by Vincent Bertault("Applicant") 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 Ladies and Gentlemen: We are the attorneys for the Applicant and write in furtherance of our letters of March 10, 2021. and March 11, 2021 regarding this matter. In support of our position that movement of the structure is not a feasible or reasonable alternative, we enclose 8 copies of the following cost estimates to demonstrate the additional expense and hardship to the Applicant: (1) $4,985.00 estimate of Casola Well Drillers, Inc. for new well (existing well will be covered by foundation if structure is moved,thereby requiring installation of a new well); and (2) $3,800.00 estimate of Promaster Electric Inc. issued to the Applicant's agent for electrical work; and (3) $5,500.00 estimate of The Crab Home Improvement for cost of gas line extension. We have not yet obtained estimates for the additional foundation work, the moving of the HVAC system, or other items incident to moving, as opposed to raising, the house. Thank you for your consideration of this material. Vytruyours, Essler EJB/cs Ends cc— Vincent Bertault. Estimate Promaster Electric Inc. Estimate Number: E210309742 PO BOX.425 Greenport Ny 11944 Estimate Date: 03/09/2021 73265 Main Rd Payment Terms: Due On Receipt Greenport,NY 11944 Estimate Amount: 3,800.00 Office Phone:(631)377-8059 Created By: Benigno Lopez Mobile Phone:(973)583-4717 promasterelectric@gmail.com Bill To Ship To Philippe Jacquet Philippe Jacquet 710 Grandview Dr. Orient,NY 11957 Electrical Work... Job name:95 Navy street Orient. 200 amp under ground electrical service. With meter panel by property wall. Labor and materials$3,800 1677 Notes 1.00 3,800.00 3,800.00 Trenching and back fill by others. Inspection fees are not included in this price. Estimate price my change after 30 days. We appreciate you considering our company and we look forward to working with you. Thank you. Subtotal: $3,800.00 Estimate Amount $3,800.00 i CASOLAItELL DRILLERS, INC. FILTRATION & TREATMENT SYSTEMS Date 600 Burman Blvd,Calverton,NY 11933 ESTIMATE Phone: 631-281-5454 Fax:631-281-0349 1/21/2021 office@casolawelldrillers.com 5612 Vincent Bertault Job: 95 Navy St vbertault@yahoo.com Orient Description Total MATERIAL AND LABOR... **The estimated total does not include "extra" listed below: 4,985.00 Installation of: One new 4" well, up to 50'deep. Stainless steel wire wound well screen. Pitless adapter. Connect to existing offset line. **EXTRA: For well depth, if over 50', additional @$ 25.00 per foot. WATER QUALITY NOT INCLUDED. *No sales tax due upon completion of capital improvement form. See final billing. Sales Tax- Suffolk County 0.00 Total $4,985.00 ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION,PIPING OR WIRING THAT IS NOT COVERED UNDER THE 811 MARKOUT,WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HOME OWNER TO REPAIR. ROUGH BACKFILL DOES NOT INCLUDE RESTORATION OF LANDSCAPE,WHICH IS THE HOMEOWNERS RESPONSIBILITY. Payment to be made as follows: 1/2 down upon signing of contract. Balance is due upon completion of job. Autorized Signature: /;ay-e t e'-we'4 ** Note:This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within 30 days.** Acceptance of Proposal: The above prices, specifications and conditions are satifactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Signature: Date of Acceptance: WARNING: PRESURIZED WATER SYSTEMS ARE SUBJECT TO LEAK.In case a serious leak should occur,Casola Well Drillers,Inc.recommends a cellar drain,sump pump or other drainage system be installed. We further suggest that any items of value be kept high above any possible flooding. CASOLA WELL DRILLERS,INC.SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL,INCIDENTAL OR CONTINGENT DAMAGES. THE CRAB HOME IMPROVEMENT Licensed and Insured Contractor ESTIMATE GUSTAVO ROJAS 44 Tompkins St East Northport NY 11731 (631)223 5313 Vincent Bertault 95 Navy Street Orient,NY 11957 Ref•.Gas Line Extension At above referenced address s.r. Item.Descrt tion Uen sM< x Amount Disconnect,extend existing gas line within new location(20')as per request,coordination with National Grid All labor and material Trench,protection and permit $5.5-05-1 [:MAR RECEIVED 2 2 2021LAWOFFICES Board Of Appeals WICKHAM,BRES'SLER 8i GEASA,,P.C. 1361$MA-1N ROAD,P O:BOX 1424 WILLIAM MICKHAM(06=02), Iv1A.TTITUCK,LONG ISLAND " ERIC J..BREMER NEW YORK: 119,52 ABIGAIL A.WICKa� JANET GEASA 631=298 8353 TEI EPAX NQ 631= 98 85;65 ebresslervubglawyeos colli March 19,202.1 Via Electronic=Niall Southold Tow, Board of Appea.is S3!095.Wit Road P.10Box 1179' Sciuthoc ,New Yark:1.1971-09$9` Re Ap.Pea1,N.o. 74GT and:AppeaI No 746SSE Pro; ex awned b .Vincent-Red 04 "A hcant" L� tY°. Y PI? . :. 9S Na cry Stn�ee� `Clrzerit,Iew'Y 'k. SfiM 1000 2'6 :12,2 Ladies:and gentlemen.: yVe are,the attorneys for the;Applxcant and'write_-concerxung the Board's determination on March 18, 2 to adjourn.these rriattars sine d,ie; W,_ that the:rn ers be placed back on the calendar gat the earliest possible date Ti e four reasons for the request are.-set forth.belowin detail. First,,an.area variance is separate and distinct from a.:certificate of appropriateness and zelaeffrom front yard setbacks:by this Board-s governed by entirely clifferent factors. A cert ficate.pf appropriateness is,of.course,.;a.co.dition foil the issuance of a l uild r g permit; Ilius,this Board:need,not address the:issue before the Historic:Preserat.on Comrnission ,("HPC") Assumirig,,ar i1g endo,the.Board:opts tb-address the HPC issues;ih-� Board=can and should grant the variance subj�et fo receipt of a aertificage'of appropriateness,as it has on.other cases See; e g,Matter of Asch, ZBA4673$,.condition #1; ,,The variance relief for the wetback from Oyster Ponds Lane is permitted only if-the proposed porch addition is approved by the.Southold;'Town Landmark Preservation Commission" As a.factual matter, the:proposed front por=ch is not the subject of o',bj:ectiori by HPC as itis not the hasis.for the:Denial. Irdeed,-the Denial does not even mention the porch. Second, the variance application for the swimming pool is not related to any required application before HPC or any other board.andthere is no other.reason why it should not -be determined. Third,.our application to HPC with respect to the facade of the barn;was made.at f e: - tirrie of applrcatio ,for the house,but:coiA&not be:puxsued: HPC:_advised that:the appl�carit' should obtain a special exceptign from the ZBAbefOreltwould Gonsid r an.applica on for a cert£tate of app ropnsteness. Thus,the applicant os caught bef. e. -two bods,each refusing to dant relief without przor acrion by the.other.:We bel" ev,e that ftZBAJst the ap rgpriate`board"0 grant relief an the first:iristance for two reasons. First,the request for special ez�ceptton dues not involve approval of the etenor of the structure It is an applrcatzon;relatecl to use,not appearance Seco nd,.it is.urireasonable to require ori.HPC appl e` tion to approve an exterior related to an apartment use wl_en such use Lias not been �.ppra�ed by your Board°: - R%nally,as a pr l mattier,tlie:deterrnination to table sine dte was fl appropow The ptrbltc hearingzon March 4,2021.vvas originally proposed ley the Bard to be clos, $ ect,to ro'cetpt bf.requested-documentation However; t the Applioant's sequest the hearing vOs;held open bat$to presentadditional.rr aterialAn.0 for the apporton4 to coininent on sarn0 or any-other submis4ons received,by the Board and,address any questions of the Board The agenda for the rnecting.11s,w as a proposed action a resolution to close the,hcarirg,clearly indcaiang that tte heaxng was still open, Thus;the hearing off; thrs matter has not-been closed and the Applicant should have been afforded on opporEuuYty to address the Board�n cnixtectiorl tuxth the previously uneiscussed proposed: tabling s die of the matter specifically,the procedure employed by the BQ'ard at the; Speeal lvleeting depri fed the Applicant af.guch ori opportun�iy t his.cletrtment. y reason of the foregoing,we asl{thatthe matter be,returned'to the-ZBA calendar, for the next available date.Thank you fAox;.you'.constcleration of this re uest.. . Very trul urs, . . Erie r r; REC�Ii/gp Errcls �0111n ec Yittcerrt Bertauli 9 mrd Of 4 John,Burke,Esq: R�15 f RECEIVED MAR 31 2021 Zoning Board OfAppe�is LAW OFFICES WICKHAM,BRESSLER& GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD,P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET'GEASA 631:-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.,631'=29&8565 ebressl,er@wbglawyers.com March 30,2021 Ms. Elizabeth Sakarellos Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Re: Appeal No. 7467 and Appeal No. 7468SE Property owned by Vincent Bertault("Applicant") 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York SCTM# 1000=26-1-12.2 Dear Ms. Sakarellos: Thank you for Your e mail of 3/24/2021 requesting writings from the HPC in connection with the Bertault applications. We write to advise that any correspondence, writings, or documentation received from HPC concerning Bertault have been previously provided to the ZBA, with the exception of the transcripts of meetings which have not yet been made available. We further advise that a conference was held on March 10,,2021 to discuss the bases for the HPC objections and possible resolution of the issues. At the conference none of the issues related to the subject matter before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Specifically, HPC has no objection to the proposed wraparound porch and the pool and accessory apartment are not before HPC. Very trul yours,, Eric J. Bressler EJB/cs Encls cc— Vincent Bertault. Fuentes, Kim From: Fuentes, Kim Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 10:42 AM To: Leslie Weisman Forward Cc: Sakarellos, Elizabeth; Donna Westermann Subject: FW:Vincent Bertault Attachments: 20210517084853.pdf, 20210517090319.pdf 0 k, I finally spoke with John Burke. Originally, the HPC denied Bertault, and applicant appealed to the Town Board. A settlement was agreed upon after litigatin which reflects the plans as described. No changes to the setback of the SFD, only the removal of the cupola. Kim E. Fuentes Board Assistant Zoning Board of Appeals 631-765-1809 kimEctsouthoidtown n y.oro i Location:54375 Main Road Mail:P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11952 From: Fuentes, Kim Sent: Monday, May 17, 202110:29 AM To: Leslie Weisman Forward <lesliekweisman@gmail.com> Cc:Sakarellos, Elizabeth<elizabeth.sakarellos@town.southold.ny.us>; Donna Westermann <donnaw@southoldtownny.gov> Subject:Vincent Bertault I discussed this matter with Tracy Dwyer (HPC Secretary) again this morning. The HPC voted on and granted the changes to remove cupola and reduce in size (submission from Eric Bressler attached), but the applicant has not submitted the amended application to "the building dept." Tracy will not sign off of the HIPC Cert. of Appropriateness (COA), until the building dept. receives the amendment, although the COA can be released per John Burke. I will ask the applicant for the hardcopies and a PDF of the amended site plan and architectural plans and will forward. Kim E. Fuentes 1 Board Assistant Zoning Board of Appeals 631-765-1809 kiLmA�southoldtownny.gov Location:54375 Main Road Mail:P.0. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11952 2 our Unigie tim i r Mariella Ostroski,Chairperson `may �` �� Town Hall Annex Anne Surchin,Vice Chair ; SOUTNOLD r 54375 Route 25 Joseph McCarthy uAB C £,, PO Box 1179 Fabiola Santana "-' 2 Southold,NY 11971 = ` Hca r�, o Allan Wexler ��0 �� Telephone: (631)765-1802 Tracey Dwyer,Administrative Assistant 9FSERVATION southoldhpc@southoldtownny.gov Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commission April 15,2021 RESOLUTION #04.15.21.3RECEIVED Certificate of Appropriateness#04.15.21.3F 3 2021 Zoning Board Of Appeals RE: 95 Navy Street,Orient,NY SCTM#1000-26.4-12.2 Owner: Vincent Bertault RESOLUTION: WHEREAS, 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY is on the Town of Southold Registry of Historic Landmarks, and building lies within the designated Orient Historic District according to the National Register of Historic Places and the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 170-8 of the Town Code(Landmarks Preservation Code) of the Town of Southold, all proposals for material change/alteration must be reviewed and granted a Certificate of Appropriateness by the Southold Town Historic Preservation Commission prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, and, WHEREAS, the applicants representative Gary R. O'Connor submitted an amended proposal to the prior application that received a public hearing on October 22, 2020 and was denied a certificate of appropriateness as per Resolution#10.22.20.2, and, WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the design changes and on April 15, 2021 held a vote to approve the proposed modifications as applied for, and, WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission resolved to withdraw the appeal and approve the accepted amended proposed drawings as alterations and additions to the existing single-family dwelling as applied for under the recommendation of the Southold Town Legal Department,.and, WHEREAS, the proposed location of the project will require zoning board of appeals approval before it receives a building permit from the Building Department, and, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the Southold Town Historic Preservation Commission determines that the proposed work detailed in the above referenced application meets the criteria for approval under Section 170-8 (A)of the Southold Town Code and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the Commission approves the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness. MOVER: Commissioner McCarthy SECONDER: Commissioner Santana RECEIVED AYES: Ostroski, Surchin,McCarthy and Santana MAY 1 3 2021 ABSTAINED: Commissioner Wexler Zoting Bcard C?rgnpeals RESULT: Motion Approved Please note that any deviation from the approved plans referenced above may require further review from the commission. dour UniqueyEdward Webb,Chairperson ��` ' , @�� Town Hall Annex Anne Surchin,Vice Chair SOUTHOLD 54375 Route 25 Robert Harper LLIUM ' a PO Box 1179 ;.•'ri Joseph McCarthy - = z Mariella Ostroski ml + k rrt, o Southold,.NY 11971 0, Tracey Dwyer,Administrative Assistant Fax(631)765-9502 A o�� Fax (631)765-1802 9ESFRVATION O www.southoldtownnv.gov Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commissi December 17,2020 RECEIVED RESOLUTION #10.22.2 "No �-igG,&56 0.2 MAR 112021, Certificate of Appropriateness Zoning Board Of Appeals RE: 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY SCTM# 1000-26.-1-12.2 Owner: Vincent Bertault RESOLUTION: WHEREAS, 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY is on the Town of Southold Registry of Historic Landmarks, and building lies within the designated Orient Historic District according to the National Register of Historic Places and the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 170-8 of the Town Code(Landmarks Preservation Code) of the Town of Southold, all proposals for material change/alteration must be reviewed and granted a Certificate of Appropriateness by the Southold Town Historic Preservation Commission prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, and, WHEREAS, the applicants representative Gary R. O'Connor submitted a proposal to construct a rear addition to the structure, replace the windows, doors siding and roof on the entire structure, the reconfiguration of the front entry, conversion of an existing shed to a cabana and installation of a covered porch, and, WHEREAS, a pre submission hearing was held on August 18, 2020, where the applicants representative submitted drawings of the scope of work and outlined the project for the commission, and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on October 22,2020, where the applicants representative submitted the final proposal of the project for the commission, and, WHEREAS, the property is currently in use as single family home and under the proposed plan that single family use remains. Therefore, the analysis of whether the proposed alteration is consistent with principles of adaptive reuse, whereby the principal historic features of the landmark are maintained while permitting the use of the landmark for new uses other than its original use is not applicable to this proposal. WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission considered similarity in design, architecture and appearance of the proposed alteration with the historic design, architecture and appearance of both the original structure and those in the surrounding historic district and determines as follows: REC 1. The proposed alteration will significantly change the appearance of the Navy p-74�156' Street facade since the front door and steps leading to the porch will, be centered under the large dormer, The proposed 1-story addition facing to the 11 2�2i rear of the.Structure,.composed_.of a.summer/dining.room,.(1.5'-8"_Iong.x.14'. deep) rising 19' in height from the first floor elevation to the ridge, is in fact Zoning Board Of Appeals equivalent to a two-story house. Also proposed is a rectangular cupola adding another 3'-11" to the overall height of the structure. Part of the wing facing Willow Street also includes a new bedroom, 20' long stepped back 12" from the summer/dining room, running parallel to Navy Street. 2. The addition is not subservient to the principal building. While its ridge is 15" lower than the original house the new cupola of the addition is actually higher than the house ridge. The massing of the rear dwarfs the scale of neighboring houses. The three wings together don't relate to one another or the neighbors and the inchoate and conflicted forms of the proposed alteration and addition just aren't compatible with the general historic character of the National Register Historic District. WHEREAS, the proposed construction is not necessary for compliance with the applicable building codes or other federal or state regulations, and, WHEREAS, the proposed construction is not necessary to allow for a use of the property permitted by the Town Code in the applicable zoning district; WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to preserve the historic features of the landmark and its relation to the historic character of the community and Town as the subject property although altered over the years to be relevant for its time, still represents a fine example of the rural regional vernacular style typical b �REC�tVE of Orient cottages in the 19th century. This cottage, with it existing front L+t J V door offset from an axial stepped entrance,ntrance, includes two dormers, one small MAR 11 2021 and one large, puncturing the roofline but extending straight up in the same l e plane as the front wall, and along with an amalgam of small additions at the zoning Board Of Appeals rear constitute the major features of this structure, all of which are visible from Navy Street, and, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the Southold Town Historic Preservation Commission determines that the proposed work detailed in the above referenced application fails to meet the criteria for approval under Section 170-8 (A)of the Southold Town Code and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the Commission denies the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, Pursuant to §170-7(C)(3) the Historic Preservation Commission makes the following recommendations: 1. The linear link between the structures on Navy and Willow streets shows first floor fenestration east elevation composed of three casement windows sitting under a dormer, which-is -the same width as -tlfd window-ensemble below:This elongated dormer with three awning,windows awkwardly mimics the roof pitch of the side gable of the house on the east side of the cottage. If it had punctured the wall plane like the dormers on the front of the house or been designed as a shed dormer, the result would be more historically accurate. 2. If the scale of the addition were reduced and made sympathetic to the original existing house then the project might be viable. 3. Retain the off center entry as such a design element is typical for Shingle era houses built during the 1880s-90s, MOVER: Commissioner Harper SECONDERe Commissioner Surchin AYES:Webb, Surchin, Harper, McCarthy and Ostroski ABSTAINED: Commissioner Santana RESULT: Denie Signed: Ce Tracey L.Dwyer,Application o rdinator for the Historic P servation Commission __t DAWN HOUSE MOVERS 1 Manor Rd. Yaphank, NY 11980 631 -924-3818phone - 631 -924-1598 fax House Moving-House Raising-House Shoring-Rigging Customer Contractual Agreement Date: March 8, 2021 Customer: Vincent Bertault REUM . 95 Navy St 140 - Orient, NY 11957 MAR 11 2021 Phone number: (917) 667 4166 Zoning BoardOfA Email: vbertault@yahoo.com 9 ppeafs Job: 95 Navy St, Orient NY 11957 Dawn House Movers hereby certifies that our company is fully insured and bonded.` Dawn House Movers agrees to: supply all labor and equipment to raise the house on the property, as presently located so new foundation can be excavated. Owner/contractor is to do all disconnects - water, gas, plumbing, electric, etc. When the foundation is completed by another contractor, Dawn will lower the house on new foundation and pull out all equipment. For the total sum of: $22,500.00 Half due upon raising, balance due immediately upon lowering Agreement: The total price includes required insurance and over-the-road moving permits. Any changes in the above specifications shall be made in writing,and as evidence of agreement, shall be signed by both parties. The contractor shall not be held responsible or liable for any loss, damage or delay due to causes beyond his control, including negligence of another contractor on the job, or any act of God including wind and water. If the owner or contractor disposes of the property by sale or otherwise before this contract has been fulfilled, then the full unpaid amount of the contract shall become due and payable at once. Acceptance: The above agreement and terms of payment are hereby accepted and you are authorized to do the work as specified. Contractor: Dawn House Movers Customer: By: Date: r� DAWN HOUSE .MOVERS 1 Manor Rd. Yaphank, NY 11980 631 -924-3818 phone 6.31 -924-1598 fax House Moving-House Raising-House Shoring-Rigging- Customer Contractual Agreement Date: March 8,, 2021 RECEVED Customer: Vincent Bertault 95 Navy St MAR 112021 Orient, NY 11957 Phone number: (917) 667 4166 Zoning Board Of Appeals Email: vbertauit@yahoo.com Job: 95 Navy St, Orient NY 11957 Dawn House Movers hereby certifies that our company is fully insured and bonded. Dawn House Movers agrees to: supply all labor and equipment to relocate the house on the property (17' North), move off existing site so new foundation can be excavated. Owner/contractor is to do all disconnects - water, gas, plumbing, electric, etc. When the foundation is completed by another contractor, Dawn will move the house back, lower and pull out all equipment. For the total sum of: $52,500.00 Half due upon raising, balance due immediately upon lowering Agreement: The total price includes required insurance and over-the-road moving permits. Any changes in the above specifications shall be made in writing,and as evidence of agreement, shall be signed by both parties. The contractor shall not be held responsible or liable for any loss, damage or delay due to causes beyond his control, including negligence of another contractor on the job, or any act of God including wind and water. If the owner or contractor disposes of the property by sale or otherwise before this contract has been fulfilled, then the full unpaid amount of the contract shall become due and payable at once. Acceptance: The above agreement and terms of payment are hereby accepted and you are authorized to do the work as specified. Contractor: Dawn House Movers Customer: By: Date: BRIAN HARRIS 320 EAST 18TH STREET New York,New York 10003 Telephone 646-4564297 Southold Town Tax Receiver, Justice Courtu 53095 Main Road -7 �6-7 � 6X5 P.O Box 1409 MAR 1, 1 202 LZ Offing Board Of Appeats Southold, NY 11971 RE: Vincent Bertault Residence To Whom It May Concern: I own 320 East 18f Street, NY, NY 10003 in Manhattan. At one time Mr. Bertault rented an apartment there from 2001 to 2008. He has not lived there since over 12 years. Please contact me if you need anything further. Sincerely, Brian '' �n.Hr dine.nlw ��:<n•BA.n N<rnaat I.Wirblllppmvl<aa r 0 1011A]M ISM.IIaSVO' Harris! Brian Harris LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER& GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD,P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 RECEIVED TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565 RECEIVED ebressler@wbglawyers.com MAY 13 2021 May 12, 2021 l t.& g St�5 Zoning Board Of Appeals Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Re: Appeal No. 7467 and Appeal No. 7468SE Property owned by Vincent Bertault("Applicant") 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 Zoning Board of Appeals: We are the attorneys for Vincent Bertault,the applicant in the above referenced matter. We enclose for the Board's consideration a copy of the Certificate of Appropriateness issued by the \ Historic Preservation Commission May 11, 2021,together with a portion of the original application which was amended(Sheet#'s A-5, A-6 and A-7). Please advise if the Board desires any further information. VerqJ. iesslfer�-- EJBIcs urs, Eri Encls cc— Vincent Bertault. • y out unigo E Mariella Ostroski,Chairperson zm�� bell sTown Hall Annex Anne Surchin,Vice Chair 54375 Route 25 Joseph McCarthy �� ` PO Box 1179 uta�x Fabiola Santana Southold,NY 11971 Allan WexlerTelephone:(631)765-1802 Tracey Dwyer,Administrative Assistant s R`"�tMVATIO, G sou tholdhacrul.southb 1d jgMMyMy Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commission April 15,2021 RESOLUTION#04.15.21.3 Certificate of Appropriateness RE: 95 Navy Street,Orient,NY SCTM#1000-26.-l-12.2- Owner: 000-26.-1-12.2Owner: Vincent Bertault RESOLUTION: WHEREAS, 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY is on the Town of Southold Registry of Historic Landmarks,and building lies within the designated Orient Historic District according to the National Register of Historic Places and the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). r" WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 170-8 of the Town Code(Landmarks Preservation Code) of the Town of Southold, all proposals for material change/alteration must be reviewed and granted a Certificate of Appropriateness by the Southold Town Historic Preservation Commission prior to the issuance of a Building Permit,and, WHEREAS, the applicants representative Gary R. O'Connor submitted an amended proposal to the prior application that received a public hearing on October 22, 2020 and was denied a certificate of appropriateness as per Resolution#10.22.20.2, and, WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the design changes and on April 15, 2021 held a vote to approve the proposed modifications as applied for, and, it J 9 `* WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission resolved to withdraw the appeal and approve the accepted amended proposed drawings as alterations and additions to the existing single-family dwelling as applied for under the recommendation of the Southold Town Legal Department, and, WHEREAS, the proposed location of the project will require zoning board of appeals approval before it receives a building permit from the Building Department,and, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the Southold Town Historic Preservation Commission determines that the proposed work detailed in the above referenced application meets the criteria for approval under Section 170-8(A)of the Southold Town Code and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the Commission approves the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness. MOVER: Commissioner McCarthy SECONDER: Commissioner Santana AYES: Ostroski,Surchin,McCarthy and Santana ABSTAINED: Commissioner Wexler RESULT: Motion Approved Please note that any deviation from the approved plans referenced above may require further review from the commission. C. Parkin The ZBA has received an amended parking plan which meets the concerns of the ZBA. The ramp to the barn was previously approved in 2014 by all relevant agencies. D. The Porch Variance The only comment with respect to the variance request concerning the porch is that, in the opinion of the commenter,"it serves no purpose". This is not an acceptable basis for denial. In fact,the porch serves the important purpose of providing outdoor seating farther. from Navy Street, shade from afternoon sun, and access to the garden and is compatible with the Orient hamlet atmosphere. E. Configuration of the Accessory partment The issue before the ZBA is the use of a portion of the first floor of the barn for an accessory apartment. Thus,the lay-out of the proposed apartment is irrelevant, as is the means of access to the second floor. These are matters for the Building Department, not the ZBA. F. The.Pool The only comment with respect.to the variance request concerning the swimming pool is that it should be screened to the west from view. The Applicant has already agreed to provide screening. G. Conclusion These applications have been subject to much obstruction,delay, interference, and irrelevant objections. These reasons are not valid reasons to delay either variance application.There is now no need fora:variance in connection with the special;exception as all of the conditions fora special exception have been met. There is no reason to deny same. As the ZBA is well aware,.there are numerous accessory apartments throughout Southold Town, and, indeed, in Orient. That the Applicant sought to legally obtain such an improvement is something to be respected rather than attacked. We urge the ZBA to approve the applications. We thank the ZBA for its attention to these applications. VeU., ressler ours, Eric ETBIcs cc—Vincent'Bertaaclt 1 LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER& GEASA, P.C. 1`301"5 MAIN ROAD,P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC 1.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.•631-298-8565 < O ebressler@wbglawyers.com C October 6,2021 �o ; l hen � Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53.095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Res Variance Appeal No. 7467 and Special Exception No. 7468SE Property owned by Applicant Vincent Bertault 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 Ladies and Gentlemen: We are the attorneys for the Applicant and write in response to the multitude of letters received by the Zoning Board of Appeals, ("ZBA"), immediately prior to and since the last public hearing. As has been the case with the prior public hearings and the prior correspondence, the latest communications are almost entirely irrelevant to the issues before the ZBA,but,rather, ad hominem attacks on the Applicant.Nonetheless,we address, infra, six of the common areas of complaint/comment. A. Length of the Process The length of the process has been dictated by the Historic Preservation Commission and the ZBA. Between these two agencies, aggravated by the continuing neighbor complaints and intervention, approximately 15 months have elapsed without the Applicant being able to effectively move forward. This far exceeds typical time frames. B. The Condition of the Applicant's Property The present condition of the Applicant's property is a result of the failure to promptly process applications and actual interferences in Applicant's approved work. If the variance with respect to the porch is granted, work on what some have described as a run-down cottage can proceed, Work on the storm water management plan and sanitary system can be completed once the ZBA makes a determination. At that time the work can be completed and,piles of dirt backfilled, and the area finally re-graded in accordance with the approved plan. The longer the process takes,the longer before work can be completed. v 1 Fr mAFMI 9 —__— m —----------- iYrjsR M PA. — N W-Z "I"'i 12�7 Kz 1,(, Y 1 s 1st 1" Tif'�.c'�w i TA �r'I TLi LYs -K NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION II II a Hill A H ci sleoddVio Pjeog buluoz 0 Z2 C) > s a5 X Ln GIADN'd GARY R.O'CONNOR ARCNRECT•ALA � [R]IPp KW • /'/v LCLR'USTREEL o.w Lm1MO RpOL�noa nr r ' —•—•—•--- SPECIFICATION OUTLINE �•/L�Ew-i,i�r➢mir vv-sli+ormcL is+5 / - -TQrb MLV/�D�L.Y-!±0 CE6lRSrOROLES,➢VEATRR INIURAILY. • %JS.�•->�>' .\IIS / _ - ,�i4' 1 CM%RS1miOLES-Yr AD Rl]IURrT1Y. [a[1F0 F[,O,T OI IO�MTE/AOu]LCaq/[OWrli• I,IN.C[�]IKLLYIiGf rn / �'.•'^:• nP,itQ TNIV SYOOTXSTUCMWUCRA:EA,RTMTONNECOLORTDD. r•-+ •i{ } ®n}7T ®t.i fs"- u .'Vr.r+T.. -" •-'4- ..f.y ..n.::,tt� 1 tl1UM. ,,S,L ••�• � �.t •.. Tl rCYT uttMUSW Y/MSFAMR O R�TCR EI7STLY0.SDl to ? i {c cr.. „ €➢r: a.anu. I '}fTI TI ITR`'�' T . '�-''�=p.�>• .m' s�".r4++r• � nw.o curtCa Y18L'C8'dTS SLUE STONE ORS]CCARMATURµSTQrC. rtPu,00Yw n000 0•awcNwL;m.Tr-----•-•-- -7 - 4= _ :'•T1•.'S' 1O�Y r,F 3°.114vµ! JSS c fLy7 'vlw�„•. ti; •\.-4•l g:.1,• zf�➢ _;.. \ ._ _ (y.. TFRRAC[rr,rne➢orr• ,Z s.iP....r� +r R', �. ;;S r�rs. �^y .R...!>C;.�fa'.;� r•• s.�etas.� T' 2..y :h• Y�+ .s 'S,7 .a'•n ,y _. Fs^��i•,ti P„ydr�fr'r.s*�y.�� Tat��y i.T�' Nry�'� r .{� .`4.�{�'• •a.±i+� .�➢r\ ;.`;v. ti�•••3�`t -k�.•y a��r4 rt }y.:f._.t Tn 3,-,�.��t� '2"S.`.�i••hr�:r�+'a�''aT ]�;i.� [, y �n F- �1!' .,r a;x=n„i �,�.-'ley,,,rf,dyµa}}.''. .�H i..�.,;.a �s'yr,..«.c ��.h"�-e;,,e'4:i- ...x J'�,,Jk ,5 k ° ,,s.:: ”` ,;:U•'�..N.. `�;'..7 J'ur .J-r3•�"rs,'1"i i,�,;.* c :{ Lti`c� ...moi.a "cka .r,,Ki�r,q.s[ ,f� HS:7>`"ri r •.•.z •� �"•.k'.-.&�"rtc r•.�.++tr'}'?[..: ,.<,�3 �'` L E,,,.•„4•m-a<*'a t ra ''` -t_"i.•'is. ` 71'1,.}.ter c ;;:_ r z's V O v_��•v.�.. _.-�x:_..4.•.'=••.T_.�,.i`�`?L�'r G:C� .,..1`i��,.l'�:>�,v;' sv \ � � >!Arsi'4' ss• "v'�>�+ � � ,�..aJ .>s'{W �f '�'�'`'C'K 7�'C�' a :. W'-`c� � p�c:�Esc<.. � �_ v .1 :_ _... A `lh[ r._.'•r'a ^ -,,*5 �Y.� J _'..t', -^ �,,d`: ..z �wz ��{7'c.kT i.`y",S• } Cl) LO W OU U A 1 EAST ELEVATION lout•.•.ra o' i=' m U- O O O N rn a Z y O 0 70 'CD Lv LO IOP orrc-+ca,00u Rnr1 mr-.-.-.- - ("-FACE a - rWTROgit]M1IY !7�S --T^I� ,T � • aVinN RrIDQO COWrxrlLLVA1Dy --------------------- 2-.-.-.-.-.- •••. •-1f �iiu vrwmatmnos/rr N. 100\YM rLOOQ- KW NIAtV'.10P Y - �• -—-- TM.fflN1W�^"- •^'•�-'r• ••f[I1RAfE•gAALE�]Y�ti -•^r"-.rt•cv�?� -+_" .. ..c .7rc• 7 s;�,y Aiv"'T'fz L*ee� M^,< u r} 2. rlp c: E - A fasJx"'%� atf-st +'"'.I41.1 �t§r,•'"�>t��.r .�a),,;•?;2"� ,,P�r�•�t `` �,; a'G p �' ^3•;�7'� +-�'`�'T:7}Fty_��-n�'.:t .,x�?5'�`�`.��'..;r�v c;•t to 4"�7 ^�.a. ^�'� s r l,�.r. }�bactgz'3..v y 1"`.).r"�"`d,, :r..r17',ya.r<'�I�, ..��n "e,r2;'c„7'f'+1.?.c..�rrt➢..;ar,"2.•':�r,+�'3"".. +�r:x:.. � J,•., t.v. ....; .,Y.t-r. 4 >':,,,,....g-s,Ti•s.ttf 'x' :r. � ,,. T�.>,e.us�1c`t_l�i'.�".+��'v.�.�"e..+.N 1"AYi•i tr .x. 3sy,�Y3•..!a"';.�>F.�!•'•!t�ilS a a �• • �..va:'�f x�1,•y=.q._ �� .t�N7...1q V t J^ �.d n-L.',:� �+,,l.:a�j{:'• ;.�„L]r rYxr wJl,r,b s rx3N,tr \C!,,`i>�� PR].�IEQALLLP.euOrroVL47[RAn01s `Cri� �__'__-e...w.>:L_,y.�..-:..: .a u�Y�': -?°�s'::.- T+4'i>�r$�'.�}s°�e'"a"�'%',�}.e �i{ »�2Wr'� .� s.�ts.ai, E� Sa4 Y F •C:��uw 4 ,.�b74ht�au C -u ti'S�r w .._......v._....r�>L+..�a.,..._..+L:..�c�,_._,_-.�._...,...��'�'..cy�++•?',.��:i31 c•�_rT's�,..'x�l` .y>-ars�^P„y�i s��1�sL>3.T,di"E„�Y��ti�� no,,,mrwr '' _ _J 1fYxaR[u.�rT,rQ/lra(•nA 711 E%TEIOy➢ElZMA S Imn 1,•-- I 2 NORTH ELEVATION[mu.Y.< """'�" A-6 GARY R.O'CONNOR utGrrTECT.M -nisi: f ' ecow SLsTT1EET 1RUC C>JSN VJJaFA1Va1F.WLaa10 ' ralarJE:laanrxTs O'C„-y �•' ------- ' _ Tn�� arr B--'-•---=-------•-•-•-------•------ - --'---•---•---•-------•-•------- ---'Iurirl MLGir Or uaamtc�cLTa.,� fiG9E SPECIFICATION OUTLINE ..•f.6.w:.7v ; - •r - _ _ CEW&4NMES.wEAMCEA KknRgUT. , :":r"� ''` l iY T.1•,e• •`t. ,,.fj� _ P T CMkq SMGES.wttTWn MRALSr. SUCOTH STUCCO.KUTWE FNiTH TOSE COLOR T9D. Arse-,n+5•+' �. r;d' -5-� t- .. ' 'S Ad Y•yJ 1 4 {'^ (' F :� r. CUSTOU mwl$tOOrys TO WTCH FASILYG 3DL v .: 1 _ ,-:_,. .. � e;•J�" rri-,:t r. _ .4n uuxftveuuwJVKEnerx Yfd'.KddYS •• y Imo: . .�:,. BWESTOYECASML1.RMTURALSTO\E - U T n II T rtwuCL mr.�--. — aTnQTrnrnL m 'r7^m, F^I Y c �y�sc- e"-.i.,{x.1 ti.,,.'.Sq r..J.'SF 1-wyh t e•.''r+l',S•r'a'Tt�',up TAT".a�17,'�"_ —.—.—.—.—:r_I:°uew•irwrt L�iav'u'•i'ur.T b ¢ - 5*`1E.s "$.c-.fir E a,.. 'J $-li t�.0 cfi� •4M.-. 1�1- '++.- t`k,:')%ku �r;'� y J=1 y :,' rF; r si Ft,.. `t •r.¢.1 kms.. q.,+.Y�'"vi /�,k„.1. .fir fs.. - - - - O ,}�3^3 ``�L i t•1.�.� � r."4 �y $.rtt � L".rt "� rcu.,mrunn000 •�""�`.�':,Ls..Jt�w';x� �.l..�r:;`x:T s�+t.,;•;.;. T;'e ?`-.'4„-i��.'�.�,''.`Twwk+' .v?ei'y:r,�. �t Y+1 �'.,,1 i�•s-;Fti Jrx�s"}�7. _,'rw.v+ �"5 'r .i:,;�. � .z -• rr<->r a -.. ..�;;�u amLnYmo crin':m._ r�K.. .}"i-t..3 Y .,.+ .> ,.r.3• 'it^� y-�,f� ,J"s, 1 + r 4 AI.s��. a, -,,-r ^b-.'F f r. y ry FT.t,•..-'x^•�' �-u"."'`+,S S•3" .» - ' .a i y•:1- �c'.. ,.ter.'+r•>. F- :'f'�5ryfs`#,d„ f, "'zTC -. .rf`"T"r`�k'n'tC `-+r 1.. aT• :iS'�,, yf,' u, `'.?'7 .it,rrnal' ,. r-^,V.-k v. D:,•?r/rpt .?ir�'.xJ X, TS'•`!'•' 1, �. 'J�'f• _...�aa__P... ,�,.+.�:.:'�.^__..�-L�,...a�-i�...,.`..:`':L``t.::"i-•-.-+�'-.. �a�-.'?xr,�y' r.g3., "`,I`a �q . v' �y� .� •-IJ.Gw+1 yk., �rsts3r,�,fi.. f F,C+�,�a z .sr-.��R` ' 7 �k tt4��c -f r ��•3u•�z ..�,, r a ci7`f f --,a.....s`-'u•,.Jr.1;..a�.rsr:_.�:_. �.�-.:.i ......JL.rI_...�a...•v•,..-S _ s...us._......_-i.� k3 "i`� ""a:v:_��1 � � O S U A� 3 WESTELEVATION,<acr..r< `�^•• s� rn Z TF n a� r77 -� rOIDI L>iS,NOIUaDl lrnclrt,Lrr _ Q N °Twwr"atawiaunriJo.ncE��.�-------• _ ---------------------- --------------------- TM' •------------------- •/ tet.• Ion Or�aN aC�OdlgpDL I1>.T 1� T n wn1 n exm. :v»m, r �dam oa+,t�t2Lv�me 1 ur •. �oano.,� --------------------- I{I ruu mruurl000 0 aTtan m _ ri.:uucitouit•- _ r[u TtDN _ _ r�"sc '6s {y}+:c'4a`�.. t rj,_r�nr,,,�.-s ,s, -a• gy..c.",..o�x r fs,r• �:su+• y,;- •7} -s'=�,i,.» watircLr iod I"• ...M t -v'Y.:: ...-�,•' .•r.. t�.,.J�ti>s.n,F'.2 -a^. -� ,xLg�nn „_•,,alU.a r<._uh --t..... f.;z7?S. �r Yi��'nf.�• -•.+r'�. .�£w. z Si`i<:'�°x.":t�l.�Y.rte S�t>,�y^e r cr;�3"4t`L�,,.n�.» �.� •'c5: rw �, .,a ,.,A....... .4.i- � .�` i p7^tl f..,�„s ..�><��,�d, e,cz�'�`.:'� ?� ,r t"i�...+ � .3� .�= rN<�,£'�- iomLDenLnDa•nroll Jamuron t'� �dga�x+r� ti'ti`a`a?'c� f,:��T, .,cs., - d 7�s-� ^=r�•sr��Tr�. }'''•.k.�'" }j,� _J" ,tt'�'^'� ;� .t?. �z4�e ikfy;�x�-P^ef��Y�`t4`.J*�sV �F^• j;-r s,ti-i'�"='f., ''� art ..may;ru;-y"1-y�vtr'I`, I -5:7- '3 a; ( ,5't=,. +� a`T� �'''rS � »a'-w t;•t�L':Jc ;Y..,�...'N `" i''1'Y�?�"r1- '-�iy,-a:.T.3¢�r'tiF`J�r�7'-�{:•^ C� It�n+i ="' 3t c.'YS S. r � ::.�yaiJ .:Yrr�'., �i..s,:• .6 T. �% ��`� �.,,';'�' •y. Y' ...r..,''as.a ^.{"•'. „C t y„ .tP.�cy't..l't..S.. �.._.r�r� �r�,r�s.�,»-tam,i�,...1,. e >;•.'a 4h.I ..ai ay �r�� ia'r.civ,ti.! L?fii��'!-�,"*S�9}� `.r7'T':.v`.�"Y�,.41,�`7XT"`I�'3..Tt"hl';a. ,..,Cr.' .snn rtnr.ur .......r�.i na._,a�.-_'n:_-_.3;i.`' .��'f'l...., 4r 1..,3,.. i. T• 3�i.r,-G. 4uF'.,t 3 `i?,��" J•aqr r. of ^x,r,'•4. 1 Rlt3" x?ti .t"f",4t w.t•.�+ .xe. .,- .S:" p..ntrnn.oattt.r+.roaun ��t* V.a�'� .L..1,.c__,..a....� `sy.:..^}C. _.- .-u:v.�_�'. .�•''O,c...ta�_..,at��^>i•�.!"i T G } Gry-� ,r fi &.rs<:i4.._......,,m..^'...,.. .xTa? EXTUjOR mums a. I a l ax b uuwA-7 4 SOUTH ELEVATION,rxctr•ra yal_ Twomey F Latham l� SHEA, KELLEY, DUBIN & QUARTARARO, LLP ®AftDofApP�O Thomas A.Twomey,Jr. November 22, 2021 (1945-2014) John F.Shea,III Christopher D.Kelley By Email and Federal Express David M.Dubin 4 - Jay P.Quartararo t Ms. Leslie Kanes Weisman Peter M.Mott Chairperson Janice L.Snead Bryan C.Van Cott . Zoning Board of Appeals Kathryn Dalli Reza Ebrahimi Town of Southold Jeffrey W.Pagano N 53095 Main Road Karen A.Hoeg Bernadette E.Tuthill P.O Box 1179 Craig H.Handler Bryan J.Drago Southold,NY 11971-0959 Daniel R.Bernard t• SENIOR COUNSEL Re: Variance Application No. 7467 and Stephen B.Latham Special Exception Application No. 7468SE ASSOCIATES Katerina Grinko Property of Vincent Bertault Lorraine Paceleo 95 Navy Street, Orient, Town of Southold,New York Terrence Russell Christina M.Noon t SCTM# 1000-26-1-12.2 A.Chadwick Briedis Martha F.Reichert MaryKate L.Brigham Dear Chairperson Weisman and Members of the Board: OF COUNSEL Lisa Clare Kombrink Kevin M.Fox This firm has very recently been retained by numerous neighbors and Patricia J.Russell members of the Orient community in connection with their concerns and Jennifer P.Nigro Craig Gibson opposition to the above-referenced applications for 95 Navy Street, which are Joan Morgan McGivern currently pending before this Board. Scott Handwerker NY&LA BARS t LL.M IN TAXATION While we are still reviewing the ZBA, HPC, and Town Board files, we ♦ NY&NJ BARS ■ NY,NJ&DC BARS believe that the respective records before these Boards show procedural NY,NJ&FL BARS irregularities, including a potential jurisdictional defect, warranting the following Main Office actions: (1)that the ZBA hold off from making a determination until these 33 West Second St. P.O.Box 9398 irregularities and jurisdictional defect can be investigated and resolved; and(2) a Riverhead, NY 11901 re-opening of the ZBA's public hearing record to elicit comments from the public 631.727.2180and from the HPC regarding the barn,the current stop work order, and any other suffolklaw.com lklaco elements of the applicant's project that merit the HPC's comments, or remand the application to the HPC for a certificate of appropriateness. On October 22, 2020,the HPC issued Resolution#10.22.20 (the "Denial"), which denied the applicant a certificate of appropriateness for alterations and an addition to the house. Pursuant to Southold Town Code §170- 11, within 30 days of a decision, an applicant may file an appeal with the Town Board to review the decision using the same record that was before the Commission. The Applicant appealed the decision, and on April 15, 2021,the HPC, and not the Town Board resolved to withdraw the appeal and accept amended drawings upon the recommendation of the Southold Town Legal Page 2 November 22, 2021 Department- even though these amended drawings were submitted on a closed record for which a final determination had already been rendered five months prior, without any notice or hearing_ The HPC then made a motion to withdraw the previously issued denial in Resolution #10.22.20.2 and accept the amended drawings "as applied for." Chapter 170 does not authorize the HPC to determine the outcome of an appeal of one of its decisions or to rescind and withdraw a prior rendered resolution of denial under the rubric of"Old Business."Any revised plans submitted after the Denial should have been considered as a new application and a public hearing should have been held with notice to interested parties pursuant to Town Code §170-7(B). In other words, the HPC was without jurisdiction when it approved a certificate of appropriateness for the alterations and additions to the house,which are now the subject of an application before the ZBA. Not only are these events highly irregular,but they could constitute a jurisdictional defect that renders the HPC's approval void. See Hampshire Mgmt. Co. v. Feiner, 52 A.D.3d 714, 715, 860 N.Y.S.2d 204 (2d Dept. 2008); Eastport Alliance v. Lofaro, 13 A.D.3d 527, 529, 787 N.Y.S.2d 346 (2d Dept. 2004) . Although the ZBA closed the hearing record on the subject applications at their October 7, 2021 meeting,the hearing transcript shows that the question of whether the barn's ramp had been approved by the HPC remains unresolved. The current stop work order was issued because several aspects of the barn are not in compliance with the HPC's 2014 certificate of appropriateness. Therefore,the HPC's comments must be considered by the ZBA prior to rendering a determination on the instant applications and prior to any recission of the stop work order. We appreciate the ZBA considering these significant issues, and we hope we will be able to work towards resolving them in the interest of compliance with the law. Kindly file this letter in the record of this matter. Thank you. Sincerely, d yMartha . Cc: Bill Duffy, Esq. Ms. Mariella Ostroski John Burke, Esq. Mr. Michael Verity 0 Fuentes, Kim From: Barbara Cohen <bjcohen@att.net> Sent: Friday, April 2, 2021 4:29 PM To: Fuentes, Kim; elizabethsakarellos@southtownny.gov Cc: Ellen McNeilly; Marcia Sheldon Subject: Bertault- 95 Navy Street / Dear Ms. Fuentes, At the meeting this week, it was mentioned that HPC was to review a revised, amended plan submission (enlarged house, shed convert to cabana and new pool) that generated the Denial. However, no date is scheduled for the HPC. Do you have any further information about this? As regards the Barn conversion, the HPC has not received an application for this. It originally was part of a grand plan that was submitted to HPC, but then was pulled back and the house/cabana/pool remained as the "amended" application. Clarification --- at the scheduled June hearing, will the ZBA rule on the special exemption application (barn conversion) prior to HPC determining facade and fenestration treatment, particularly since interior use will dictate the exterior?, or will the ZBA await HPC decision on this item as well?. Thanks very much. Barbara J. Cohen BJC Associates, Inc. PO Box 391 Pecon is NY 11958 X917-562-4290 ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. y / 1 '1 Kim-E. Fuentes Board Assistant Zoning Board of Appeals 631-765-1809 kimf@southoldtownny.gov<maiIto:kimf@southoldtownny.gov> Location: 54375 Main Road Mail: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11952 From: Sonia Gesell <soniagesell12@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, June 14, 20219:11 PM To: Fuentes, Kim <kimf@southoldtownny.gov> Subject: [SPAM] - Vincent Bertault property at 95 Navy street June 11, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building Southold, New York I am the property owner at 255 Navy Street, Orient. My property is adjacent to ZBA applicant Vincent Bertault at 95 Navy Street. This project began In 2014 when I believe ZBA and HPC approval was given to relocate and restore a historic barn and shed at the above location with stipulations which included the preservation of some holly trees and the iconic willow tree located on said property. 2 -It-is now 2021 and the barnnas not been fully restored to the orr"ginal style and approved use as a barn and boat storage, the holly trees are gone and the iconic willow tree looks in jeopardy. The main unheated cottage on the property looks in disrepair with a shipping container/dumpster next to my property for several years now. Work has recently begun on a wall a few inches from my property line whose height, function or finished appearance has not been made clear. In the process of digging a trench for this wall the roots of all the trees and bushes along my property have been damaged. I stand to lose these trees which provide privacy screening and shade to my property. There seems to be plans for an apartment in the barn, a pool and cabana, a major addition to the cottage, a new grading plan, a new septic system and a new water management installation. I am not sure what further impact this ambitious project will have on my property. Although I am most interested in having Mr. Bertault complete the improvements to his property, he as well as the surrounding neighbors deserve all regulatory agencies to provide coordination, clarity and consistency in granting further approvals. I am asking the zoning board's careful consideration in interpreting and enforcing the laws and regulations meant to protect all property owners and the historic village of Orient. Subsequently, I would hope that Mr. Bertault would provide proof of good faith by complying with town regulations and by providing compensations to neighbors negatively affected by his proposed project. Sincerely, Sonia Gesell 3 40 out Uniqu e'NeAl r t Mariella Ostroski,Chairperson �m J °'�� Town Hall Annex Anne Surchin,Vice Chair ; SOUTN04D r 54375 Route 25 Joseph McCarthy PO Box 1179 Fabiola Santana N Pau" A-"r' o Southold,NY 11971 = rn„ Allan Wexler o � �' Telephone: (631)765-1802 Tracey Dwyer,Administrative Assistant RESERVATION southoldhpc@southoldtownny.gov Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commission April 15,2021 RESOLUTION #04.15.21.3 Certificate of Appropriateness RE: 95 Navy Street,Orient,NY SCTM#1000-26.4-12.2 Owner: Vincent Bertault RESOLUTION: WHEREAS, 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY is on the Town of Southold Registry of Historic Landmarks, and building lies within the designated Orient Historic District according to the National Register of Historic Places and the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 170-8 of the Town Code(Landmarks Preservation Code) of the Town of Southold, all proposals for material change/alteration must be reviewed and granted a Certificate of Appropriateness by the Southold Town Historic Preservation Commission prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, and, WHEREAS, the applicants representative Gary R. O'Connor submitted an amended proposal to the prior application that received a public hearing on October 22, 2020 and was denied a certificate of appropriateness as per Resolution#10.22.20.2, and, WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the design changes and on April 15, 2021 held a vote to approve the proposed modifications as applied for, and, BOARD MEMBERS --' Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes"Weisman,Chairperson �*oE SDUr 53095 Main Road•P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric DantesCAJ Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento Z2 yCO(1 Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631) 765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Collings, Town Engineer -Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector John Jarski, Senior Building Inspector FROM: Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson, Z f Kim E. Fuentes, Board Assistant DATE: June 4, 2021 SUBJECTE ZBA Area Variance and Special Exception - Bertault FILE NO. 7467 & 7468SE LOCATION: 95 Navy Street, Orient, SCTM No.: 1000-26.-1-12.2 Hi Mike; During our public hearing of June 3, 2021, we became-aware of major excavation and construction being performed for installing retainngwalls on the above subject property without proper applications or approvals. 'Since your expertise in this.. matter is necessary, we kindly .ask that you inspect the site so that our Board can be better informed as to any adverse impacts that may occur during improvements, and whether a stop work order should be. issued. The applicant .is requesting setback variance relief- for additions to a` single-family dwelling and to construct.a swimming .pool in the front yard;.;and is seeking a Special Exceptionpermit for the conversion of a barn into a garage, workshop and accessory apartment. I've attached a copy. of the site plan (Sheet A-1) prepared by Gary . O'Connor, Architect, dated 12/15/2020 and the Grading, and Drainage Plan (Page 1 of 1) prepared by John J. Condon, dated 12/14/2020; and a portion of the survey.prepared by John T. Metzger, L.S,, dated December 3-, 2020. We would greatly appreciate .your feedback prior to our next meeting of June-17, 2021 so-that we can decide-on how we should proceed with these applications. - Encls: Site Plan dated 1'2/15/2020; Grading Plan dated 12/14/2020; and surrey, dated 12/3/2020. :i -v BOARD MEMBERS y Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �QF $�(/ry 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 � Q h0 �O Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora [ Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. aQ 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento �yC®UNTY Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 4, 2021 Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064n L K1_ Ms. Sarah Lansdale, Director Suffolk County Department of Planning P.O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Dear Ms. Lansdale: Please find enclosed the following application with related documents for review pursuant to Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code: ZBA File : # 7467 & 7468SE- Owner/Applicant : BERTAULT, Vincent Action Requested : Additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling, construction of an in-ground swimming pool; construction of an accessory pool house/cabana and the installation of a fence. Application #7468SE is for a Special Exception for an apartment in an accessory building. Within 500 feet of: ( ) State or County Road (X) Waterway (Bay, Sound, or Estuary) ( ) Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State, Federal land ( ) Boundary of Agricultural District ( ) Boundary of any Village or Town Within one (1) mile (5,280 feet) of: ( ) Boundary of any airport If any other information is needed, please do not hesitate to call us. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman ZBA Chairperson By: S Encls. Survey/Site Plan : Gary R. O'Connor Dated : 12/15/2020 BOARD MEMBERS - Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �*0�SU(/r53095 Main Road•P.O.Box,1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora t Office Location: Eric Dantes va ,e Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Southold,NY.11971 Nicholas Planamento *T�DUMy,� _.._,T_...__T...._.^_..r_..... ....:-r_.T_._:_...,_----•---...:r_�...,_,__ mhttp.:/lsnutholdto_wnn�gay..�_ ._ ;,_._.....-- ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RECEIVED. Tel..(631)765-1809 Fax(631)765-9064 JAN 0.,4 2021 Sout old Town January 4j 2021 plannng'Board Mark Terry, Principal.Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall.Annex Southold;NY11971 Re .2BA File Ref No _# 7467 BERTAULT, Vincent . .:Dear Mark:. _ We have received an application for additions and'alterations to an existing single family' dwelling,,construction of an iriground swimming pool, construction of an accessory.pool house/cabana and the iiistallat on of;a fence. A copy of the Building lnsp .... s'Notice of Disapproval under.Chapter_280 (Zoning Code), and survey map,project description form, are attached for your.reference. ; Your written evaluation with reconitnendations for this proposal, as required.under the Code procedures of LWRP p Section.268-5D is requested within 30 days of receipt:of this letter: Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman Chairpers BY: Encls Survey/Site Plan : Gary R. O'Connor Dated : 12/15/2020 BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ��0f SO!/ry� 53095 Main Road •P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes CAV 42C Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. d O • �O 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento !,f%Oa Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 December 8; 2021, Eric J. Bressler,Esq. Wickham, Bressler& Geasa, P.C. 13015 Main Road P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck,New York 11952.. RE: Appeal No. 746.7,Bertault 95 Navy Street, Orient SCTM No. 1.000-26-1-12.2 Dear Mr. Bressler; Transmitted for your records is a copy of-the Board's December 2; 2021 Findings, Deliberations and Determination,the original of which was filed with the Town Clerk regarding the above-variance,application. Per the'conditions-of approval,please, submit an amended survey or site plan stamped by a licensed professional depicting the approved front yard variance, eliminating the in-ground .swimming pool in the front yard, and showing the location of two off street parking spaces for the principal dwelling accessed directly from Navy Street. Before commencing any construction activities, a building permit is necessary. Please be sure to submit an application along with a copy of the attached determination to the Building Department. If you have any questions,please don't hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, Kim E. Fuentes Board Assistant Encl. cc: Building Dept. WELL DRAINAGEALCULATIONS: CL.EL N/O/F W❑WOVEN WIRE FENCE SYMBOL THE PROPOSED OWE DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO PROVIDE STORAGE TEST HOLE DATA 5.1 (MIN, •14 GAUGE FOR A 2"RAINFALL. ORAGE TO BE PROVIDED IN PRECAST LEACHING MSO 121 G2OSpENCE LAWRENCE BERSTEIN W/ MAX, 6' MESH GALLEYS PROVIDINQ CF PER VERTICAL FOOT OF STORAGE AND 12/EL 5. 9 Srpr,)EET8 L 0 W CL�EL• SCTM# 1000-26-01 -06 10' MAX, C, T❑ C, SPACING) FRENCH DRAINS PRIDING 2.08 CF/FT OF STORAGE. THE DESIGN IS DARK BROWN LOAM a14TI L4.7' 0 TRENCH DRAIN BASED ON THE FOLIVING RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS:ROOF 1.0, 65.93 DWELLING ASPHALT PAVEMENT,GRAVEL PAVEMENT 0.70 AND LANDSCAPING N85-28'30"E TW 9.2 WELL 36' MIN, LENGTH FENCE 0.10. BROWN SILT ML POSTS BW 5.2 MIN, 16 4.7 INT❑ GR❑UNDRIVEN BW 5.2 3-PROPOSED 8.5'X 4.75'X 2' _ DRAINAGE AREA'A' 8' (EL 2.0 HIGHEST EXP. GROUNDWATER EGROUND. ASPHALT DEEP GALLEY STORAGE REQUIRE[ SAND SNE TO COARSE 52 EL.4.3' DRI WAY PROPOSED LANDSCAPE RETAINING HEIGHT ❑F FILTER ROOF AREA: 579.8 SFX 1.00 X 2"/12= 96.6 CF 4.3' (EL 1.5 GROUNDWA7ER ELEK) O WALL(NON SEPTIC RETAINING) w - PAVEMENT AREA: 567.8 SFX 1.00 X 2"/12= 94.6 CF O PROPOSED RETAINING WALL = 18 MIN. • (SEPTIC RETAINING) =191.2 CF 6' MIN. WATER /N BROWN FINE TO TW 8 0 F �O ,�, `V 4- `�' ,�, �, 191.2 CF_/32.0 CF/V5.9 VERTICAL FEET REQUIRED COARSE SAND SP BW 7.5 8 0 N CP CP �' `t' 1 At 2.3' ( TW 9.2 TORAGE PROVIDED. I O Bw6 , PERSPECTIVE VIEW USE 3-LEACHING GLEYS-3 GALLEYS X2 CFNF=6VF<5.9VF 1-1/2 STY. 7.83 \ N 9 5 00 E DRAINAGE AREA"B" I � � � 22 36" MIN. FENCE POST 13' FUTURE 1 BEDROOM ACCESSORY N BARN CP MON.0.2 N NOTE• WATER ENCOUNTERED 4.3 BELOW SURFACE rn 4. 3 , CO WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MIN, 14 STORAGE REQUIRE[ APARTMENT WITH 1 CAR GARAGE o FBF 8.6 EA 4.9 E.1.5 N. 0.4 E. �-- GAUGE W/ MAX. 6 MESH ROOF AREA: 291.6 SF X 1.00 X 2712=48.6 CF PENDING PECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION z STO KA E 5,7 ' ( G.F. 8.6 +, � BW 9 W - -BW 6.5- E7.EVA710NS REFERENCED TO NAVD 88 FR THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZBA) �I 20.0' SPACING) WITH FILTER CLOTH 9.4 70 20 MIN. -.., rn BW 6.7 48.6 CF/32.0 CFNF=52 VERTICAL FEET REQUIRED + TW 9.2 1 FE.O/L. FLOW - UNDISTURBED GROUND N 7.8 \ N BW 7.83 725 O 111 TORAGE PROVIDED: P POSED 8.6X4.75'X1.5'DEEP O O \ P 7'83 + 0 \ III -Q COMPACTED S❑IL - USE 1-LEACHING G/.EY-1 GALLEYS X2 CF/VF=2VF<1.52VF GENERAL NOTES GALLEY I I PROPOSED SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM EMBED FILTER CLOTH 16 MIN. DRAINAGE AREA"C" MAX.EL.7.5 A MIN. OF 6' IN GR❑UND, 1. ALL MATERIALS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE 13,1' +. ;\ LIj N STORAGE REQUIREC STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON AND THE SUFFOLK 1 �\ MIN.ELEV.6.2 COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES AS REQUIRED. RECTI❑ +7 83 7.83 I a O 4��" ROOF AREA: 287.7 SF X 1.00 X 2"/12=47.9 CF C� N VIEW WELLI 1 \ I m 47.9 CF_/32.0 CFNF=.49 VERTICAL FEET REQUIRED 2. BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION FROM SURVEY BY PECONIC SURVEYORS Lot O 0 7 rI, S PROPOSED LANDSCAPE RETAINING CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 20. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO THE NAV 88 DATUM. NEW IN GROUND 1 III WALL(NON SEPTIC RETAINING) STORAGE PROVIDED: 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL UTILITIES POOL NE w ' 111 1. WOVEN WIRE FENCE T❑ BE FASTENED SECURELY T❑ FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES USE 1-LEACHING GAEY-1 GALLEYS X1.5CFNF=I.5VF<1.49VF PRIOR TO THE COMIMENCEMENTOFWORK. THE CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED ALL P OL DW CABANA SUBSURFACE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS CONCEPTUAL AND MUST BE 10x22 FF 7 I I I 5.0 N/0/F ❑R STAPLES, P❑STS SHALL BE STEEL EITHER 'T" OR 'U' TYPE OR HARDWOOD. CONFORMED ACCOIRDINGLYINTHE FIELD. - III DRAINAGE AREA'D" STONE RETAINING WALL °D �II SONIA GESELL cn ' 2, FILTER CLOTH TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE FENCE WITH TIES STORAGE REQUIRED: 4. AMINIMUM SEPARA'�TIONOFTEN(10)FEET HORIZONTAL AND EIGHTEEN(18)INCHES TW 8.17 BW 4.0 TW 7.8 w 170 7.2 I 10.4 E�1 SCTM# 1000-26-01-11 .1 SPACED EVERY 24' AT TOP AND MID SECTION, FENCE SHALL BE WO VEN WIRE, ROOF AREA: 972.0 SF X 1.00 X 2"/12=162.0 CF VERTICAL IS TO BE(MAINTAINED BETWEEN WATER LINES,STORM DRAINAGE AND/QR BW 7.83 BW 5. 7.2 7.2 TW 6.7 DWELLING 6' MAXIMUM MESH OPENING, SANITARY LINES OR STRUCTURES. [�- 162.0 CF_/32.0 CFNF=.1 VERTICAL FEET REQUIRED 5. THE CONTRACTOR;SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING ALL NECESSARY PERMITS 6.6 Lot O GpRpEN I O BW 6.3 WELL 3, WHEN TWO SECTI❑NS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY SHALL BE OVER- BEFORE COMMENCIINGWORK. RAIN GARDEN PON( PROPOSED 8.5'X 4.75'X 1.5'DEEP LAPPED BY SIX INCHES AND FOLDED. FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE EITHER FILTER X, TOP EL.3.5 I i O GALLEY MIRAFI 100X, STABILINKA T140N, ❑R APPROVED EQUIVALENT, USE STORAGE LEACHING BOT EL.2.5 TW 6.6 USE 3-LEACHING GALEY-3 GALLEYS X 2 CFNF=6 VF<5.1 VF 6. ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIAL AND DEBRIS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN,COUNTY,STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS,CODES AND ORDINANCES.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DISPOSING OF ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIALS OFFSITE. BW 6.6 -+ 4, PREFABRICATED UNITS SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SHOWN. DRAINAGE AREA"E' DEBRIS SHALL NOT BE BURIED ONSITE. I BW 0 STORAGE REQUIRED: N/0/F M.M. D 73 ,(6 5. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND MATERIAL REMOVED WHEN ROOF AREA: 1,045.4 SF X 1.00 X 2"/12=174.2 CF 7. ALL PRECAST STRUCTURES SHALL INCLUDE SUFFICIENT STEEL REINFORCEMENT FOR TW 7.3 + -- *° C3 1 'BULGES' DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE, TEMPERATURE AND SHRINKAGE,TRANSPORT,AND TO ALLOW THE STRUCTURE TO EVAN & LYNN LEWISBW7.0 0 ® 0 m 174.2 CF_/32.0 CFNF=1.4 VERTICAL FEET REQUIRED WITHSTAND AASHTO H-20 LOADING AT THE COVER CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 73 SCTM# 1000-26-01-12.1 1 ADAPTED FROM DETAILS PROVIDED BY: USDA - NRCS, 8. ALL PRECAST STRUCTURES SHALL BE MANUFACTURED WITH 4000 PSI/28 DAY -n NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP❑RTATI❑N, REINFORCED STORAGE PROVIDED: STRENGTH CONCRETE. DWELLING \ O 6.6+ �� 1z 3-PROPOSED8.5'X4.75'X2' NEW Y�7RK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIR❑NMENTAL C❑NSERVATI❑N, SILT FENCE USE 3-LEACHING GALIEY-3GALLEYS X2CFNF=6VF<5.4VF WELL -3 I IN NEV YORK STATE SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION COMMITTEE 9. SANITARY PIPE TO IBE SDR-35 PVC ORAS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. 3-PROPOSED 8.5'X 4.75'X 2' O 7.3 a, 13. 6 �RUOM �U! DEEP GALLEY WELL DEEP GALLEY v 0 0 \ Or:3 \ WELL 10. DURING CONSTRUCTION,EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES TO BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY T0,PREVENT THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT TO OFFSITE AREAS, PONDS,DRAINAGE INLETS,ETC. THE METHODS AND MATERIALS EMPLOYED IN THE Q co 10 1 5.2' \ ;p . S Y M B E L INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL CONFORM HS O N 1 .-.i TW 7.3 v HSE. a� 6.6+ (jl FLOW ^ TO'rHE NEW YORKGUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL'. BW 5.3 -� 11. ALL BACKFILL SHALL BE SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL COMPACTED TO 95%MAXIMUM +7.3 _ O 14.4 ME " U DENSITY AT THE OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT,AS DETERMINED BY STANDARD FSC.2 SN•FRA PROCTOR TEST. I HOUSE P_ 4' VERTICAL FACE (3 BEDROOM) SEPTI 17E�VED EX.F.F•E_ _5 / FE.O/L. TW 6.7 •�r 12. LOT AREA:19,905 S.F. (�_1� � O pROp Fj: 80 D BW 6.6 135 BEDDING DETAIL �5 2 0 ® CMF NOT TO SCALE90 MAR r 2021 BW 5.2 EL.6.0' DRAINAGE AREA NO MORE THAN 1/4 ACRE PER 100 FEET BUILT UP BERM Z6ttPn9 Board OFA PICKET FE. TW 6.7 - � _---- CMF 1.1 � , „ BW 6.6 85. 71 ' OF STRAW BALE DIKE FOR SLOPES LESS THAN 25%. peals 126.23 EL.4.82.49'40"W S86 8 20 W 10'MIN. NOTE: �j ANGLE FIRST STAKE TOWARDS �f� 1. A CONCRETE WASH PIT SHALL BE INSTALLED C5.5' PREVIOUSLY LAID BALE. r, -�� ON THE PROPERTY FOR EXCESS CONCRETE �� / AND TO CLEAN CONCRETE EQUIPMENT AND CL.EL. S �� FLOW �/ - � TOOLS. 4.8 NAVY \�,, , BOUND BALES PLACED 2 GH THE SOILBRMBESURROUNDEDWRHA24' � ,,,,.,r �-/` ON CONTOUR. � ^^ r o 3. THE PIT TO BE LINED WITH HAY BALES ►��' - 2 RE-BARS, STEEL PICKETS 4. PROVIDE A24'X24•WOODSIGN LABELED SIT=- PLAN OR 2'X2' STAKES PLACED HAY BALE 'CONCRETE WASHOUT PIT'. 1 1/2' TO 2' IN GROUND. 5. THE PIT SHOULD BE EMPTIED WHEN 75% - - DRIVE STAKES FLUSH WITH CAPACITY IS REACHED AND AFTER THE EXCESS ANCHORING DETAIL TOP OF BALE. CONCRETE CURES. NOT TO SCALE C❑NSTRUCTI❑N SPECIEICATI❑NS PLAN 10'MIN. HAY BALE Plans are prepared by Condon 1. BALES SHALL BE PLACED AT THE TOE OF A SLOPE OR ON THE CONTOUR AND IN A Engineering,P.C. It is a violation of the ROW WITH ENDS TIGHTLY ABUTTING THE ADJACENT BALES. BUILT UP BERM New York State Education Law,Article � ?•� 21 ? 2, EACH BALE SHALL BE EMBEDDED IN THE S❑IL A nMINIMUM OF (4)- INCHES, AND 2'MIN v . 145,Section 7209,for any person unlessEX.GRADE acting under the direction of licensed PLACED S❑ THE BINDINGS ARE HORIZONTAL, Professional Engineer,Architect,or Land SECTION Surveyor,to after any item in any way.If 3. BALES SHALL BE SECURELY ANCHORED IN PLACE BY EITHER TWO STAKES OR an item bearing the seal of an Engineer, A RE-BARS DRIVEN THROUGH THE BALE. THE FIRST STAKE IN EACH BALE SHALL afteArchitect gineedsuArchitectrveyor orLared,the CONCRETE WASH-OUT AREA DETAIL Survey rshalle affix or Land BE DRIVEN TOWARD THE PREVIOUSLY LAID BALE AT AN ANGLE TO FORCE THE surveyor shall affix to the Rem his/her BALES TOGETHER. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN FLUSH WITH THE BALE, seal and thenotation•Alteredby DOWNSPOUT followed by his/her signature and the (SSEEEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) 4, INSPECTI❑N SHALL BE FREQUENT AND REPAIR REPLACEMENT SHALL BE MADE date of such alterations,and a specific m T PROMPTLY AS NEEDED. description of the alteration. DOWNSPOUT ADAPTER(ADS OR APPROVED EQUAL) M 5, BALES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USEFULLNESS S❑ (SEE CHART FOR PART NUMBER) HEAVY DUTY MANHOLE FRAME AND AS NOT TO BLOCK OR IMPEDE STORM FLOW OR DRAINAGE. Q SLOTTED COVER CAMBELL FOUNDRY CO. 18"x 18'x 8' i PATTERN No.1383 OR SOLID MANHOLE CONCRETE PAD COVER PATTERN No.101 2A-TYPE COR AN ADAPTED FROM DETAILS PROVIDED BY, USDA - NRCS, STRAW BALE L E W/#4REBAR CAMBELL FRAME&COVER OR AN APPROVED EQUAL MIN.2 APPROVED EQUAL. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, SLOPE STABILIZATION NOTES: EACH SIDE PLUG OR STOPPER COURSES NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT ❑F ENVIR❑NMENTAL CONSERVATION, REVISIONS PROPOSED GRADE couRSEs CONCRETE COVER BELOW GRADE IN GRASS AREAS NEW YORK STATE S❑IL & WATER C❑NSERVATI❑N COMMITTEE D I K E •+• v CONCRETE COLLAR 1. EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS ARE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED ON THE 1:3 SIDE SLOPES. ---:-_- %i':: AS NECESSARY !,:• , U) -'' 450 BEND(MAX) TRAFFIC 2. THE EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE CURLS X I AS MANUFACTURED BY AMERICAN EXCELSIOR w SEE PRECAST STRUCTURE BEARING SLAB FINISHED GRADE COMPANY,ARLINGTON,TEXAS 800-777 7645 OR APPROVED EQUAL. � PVC SCR-35 RISER AS REQ'D OR AN m ( ) NOTES FOR REINFORCING APPROVED EQUAL w 6'ADS PIPE(LENGTH VARIES) LEACHING BASIN NOTES: o REQUIREMENTS. 24" MAX E)CAVATE AND BACKFILL 3 FEET 3. THE EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND ANCHORED AS PER 0 AROUND LEACHING RINGS WITH 1.ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCEPTABLE LEACHING SOILS AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. IN THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION. I, SNAP CONNECTION c ®®®& SLEABLE POROUS MATERIAL AS EVENT POOR LEACHING MATERIAL IS ENCOUNTERED,EXCAVATION IS TO BE CONTINUED TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND N 450 BENDs APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. BACKFILLED AS DETAILED. 45'BEND (MAX)( ) z ®®M Z/ PART# PIPE SIZE A B C T AS EPQUIRED LU 4'MIN. ` 8'EQUALIZATION EP UK PLUG WYE UNTIL O SHEET PILING AS REQUIRED 2. NO TRENCH,PIT OR OTHER EXCAVATION SHALL BE LEFT OPEN OR UNATTENDED. EXCAVATIONS TO BE PROTECTED AS 0364AA 3' 2.50' 3.25' 4.75' c PIPE TO GALLEY CLEANOUT IS O464AA 4- 2.50. 3.25' 4.75' o DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER WITH FENCES,BARRICADES AND OTHER APPROVED METHODS. INSTALLED -�_- ROOF DRAINAGE COLLECTION LINE 0466AA 4' 2.56. 2.56' 4.663' 6'ROOF DRAIN LATERAL GWRAP O EXTILE(FIWITH 6 OZ.LTERMFABRICIAND AT N WOVEN 3 COLLAR 3. ALLOW FOUR(4)INCHES FOR FINAL ADJUSTING OF CASTING. ADEQUATE BEARING WILL BE PROVIDED USING CONCRETE S•C•T•M•: DIST. 1000 SEC. 26 BLK. 1 LOT. 12.2 (SEE PLAN FOR SIZE) 0664AA 6' 3.67 5.63' 6.43' WITH WYE(TYP.) GROUNDWATER A • 6' 3.62' 5.63' 6.43' TOP OF COLLAR BY MIRAFI OR AN BLOCK,BRICK AND/OR 1:2 MORTAR MIX. B E RTAU LT RESIDENCE 'Part 0664-AC is PVC NOTE: 6'ADS PIPE MAY BE DISTANCE VARIES APPROVED EQUAL. NnE: Condon d o n E n i n e e ri n P.C. USED WHEN A DOWNSPOUT IS (SEE GRADING AND LEACHING GALLEYS TO BE 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE SHEETING AND SHORING DURING TRENCHING TO INSURE THE SAFETY OF Scale:AS SHOWN a PLUG- /�\ CONNECTED DIRECTLY TO THE DRAINAGE PLAN) KNUFACTURED BY LONG ISLAND WORKMEN AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC EXPOSED TO THE HAZARDS OF FALLING AND SLIDING MATERIAL IN CONFORMANCE J 95 NAVY STREET CULTEC DRAINAGE PRECAST OR AN APPROVED EQUAL. WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TITLE 29 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS,PART 1926,SAFETY AND HEALTH REGULATIONS ORIENT, NY \ 5 EXCAVATE A MINIMUM OF 6'INTO VIRGIN STRATA LL LEACHING Drawn by:JJC O F 45'WYE FITTING STRUCTURES. SAND AND GRAVEL OR TO BOTTOM OF DRYWELL FOR CONSTRUCTION(OSHA). 1755 SlgSbee Road CLEANOUT DETAILR00 F DRAIN ADAPT E R DETAIL. WHICHEVER IS DEEPER. GALLEY DETAIL 5. BACKFILL AND COMPACTION SHALL BE IN 6'LIFTS. ALL BACKFILL MATERIAL TO BE COMPACTED BY JETTING OR OTHER Mattituck, New York 11952 GRADING & APPROVED MEANS. Date: 12/14/2020 (631) 298-1986 (631)298-2651 fax www.condonengineedng.com DRAINAGE PLAN GARY R. O'CONNOR 3 3 ARCHITECT, AIA () 4 t I I \ 8 CORYELL STREET NJ LIC.All 11652 r---------T---------"� LAMBERTVILLE, NJ 08530 PHONE.- 609.397.3635 I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I RECEWED I I ' i I I �f 7 69s 7 2021 �� ,2 I I r2 I Zoning Board OFAppeal, ` I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I U' I I I I I I I I I I I \ 4 ' I L_ I I I M I I (f) I I I I (D I I I I I I o EXISTINGARN I I i EXISTING STORAGE I I i i I I I I q) i Z I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I I 1 I I I I I I i i I I i IL——————————————— ——————————————— ——J 1 1 EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1.4'= 1'4' EXISTING SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1l4" -0° 0 O Ll NO, DUE i f d Baa'" a a v DESCRIPTION REVISIONS r r' IT IS THE RESPONSIBLTIY Of THE CONTRACTOR TO VERT Fv ALL F.ELD CONDITIONS AND COMPARE THEM 1AITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS _. BEFORE COMMENCING-ACT V:TES.ERRORS. Okild SSIONS OR ANY OTHER'NCONSISTENCIES - I �'• = CISr' ERED SHALL MMED'ATELYBE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT D PROJECT NAME PROPOSED BARN ALTERATIONS 4 , — VINCENT BERTAULT r 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT, NEN!YORK 11957 a. DRAArNu T TLE'c , - .:. ,;a,•:': .:� ,� .air"• ..: ,-.�, r EXISTING- r -- "��t.��' `� '" SING BARN PLANS . r. • .'ar DATE 07.23.20 DRAWING N0. a JOB NO. 1,950 DRAWN DS SCALE;AS SHOWN A-10 BY: a 0 NORTH VIEW (WILLOW STREET} 2, WEST VIEW (FACING WEST) (__ EAST VIEW {FACING NORTH—WEST) ® EST VIEW REVIEWED BY: GRO'C GARY R. O'CONN -AP, ARCHITECT, AIA C �� Vtio a 8 CORYELL STREET ..: 0554 LAMBERTVILLE, NJ 08530 PHONE: 609.397.3635 4'-4" 35'-8" WALL LEGEND 15-8" 20'-0" 15'-8" EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN NEW WALL Ic — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — DN. 12'-0" X 8'-0" DOOR I ° 0 6'-21/2" N 12'-101 " NEW SUMMER ROOM VOLUME CEILING i O 77 r7 r7 MI i I - /NEW BEDROOM o o I 60 FCD I X 8'-0"X 3'-0" TABLE o I \ II I DN. 2'-10" 4-41/4" 4'-O3/4• 6'-21/x' I I - T - (N) BATHROOM 0 2'-8" NEW LAUNDRY I � NEW UTILITY 0) (o Lo io n _ I _ Z co M �- "PANTRY ° O PANTRY _ -- 12'-0" \ ` cV — — — — — — — — — �-c'' / 6'-0" 3'-6" I I 5'-0" DIA. TABL I Dalcnl I �' o 01 N zi I N — / I i NEW PA RY 3'1011 PA TRYI KITCHEN � 0 3 I -II 1 3 A-7 co 5'-101/4" I I A-6 F Lo i+? \ I DN. \ , 0 O 11'-8Uz" I z I UP / DN. DN � DN. � J - - , DN. EXISTING OFFICE EXISTING BATHROOM DN. I \ I I I I 11 I � i / \ RECEIVES NEW EXISTING MASTER BEDROOM EXISTING BEDROOMAY 2 4 2Q21 N ' COVERED PORCH C) EXISTING LIVING ROOM _ DN. Q Q 03.11.21 DS REVISIONS PER HPC COMMENTARY I I NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION I REVISIONS EXISTING COVERED PORCH ( IT IS THE RESPONSIBLITIY OF THE CONTRACTOR f P TO VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND COMPARE THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS i BEFORE COMMENCING.ACTIVITIES,ERRORS, OMMISSIONS ORANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT rT PROJECT NAME PRINCIPLE DWELLING ADDITION &ALTERATIONS i for VINCENT BERTAULT 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 4 4 DRAWING TITLE A-7 A-7 PROPOSED PLANS s DATE 12.15.20 DRAWING NO. JOB NO. 1950 6 DRAWN DS SCALE:AS SHOWN A-5 BY: PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 114"= 1'-O" PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR / ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4"= 1'-O" REVIEWED GRO'C FF GARY R. O'CON .0- "Pr o,x ARCHITECT, AIAtk EXISTING NEW 8 CORYELL STREET �'' '�' • III 613 S.F. . � LAMBERTVILLE �� °��"�'6`� .� • 020554 NJ 08530 O, 0, - In PHONE: 609.397.3635 III SPECIFICATION OUTLINE '�--- TOP OF EXISTING RIDGE HEIGHT 1211-711 __. ®-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - .,- - - - - - - - - - - ROOF: HT F EXISTING RIDGE 122-4 N HEIGHT oGE CEDAR A ( ) R SHINGLES WEATHER NATURALLY. -i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TOP OF NEW RID- - - _ III ' 4_. ' � � 1',"•� I _ III �' SIDING: CEDAR SHINGLES, WEATHER NATURALLY. If _ - III � EXPOSED FOUNDATION: i L.' 1 ' I` k _ REPLACE K-STYLE GUTTERS Wi III -- - `� SMOOTH STUCCO. NEUTRAL EARTH TO L1 I c i j 1%_ I ' _ IT IT NE COLOR T.B.D. EXISTING HEIGHT OF TOP PLATE FROM SECOND FLOOR 4'-5" - U_ COPPER HALF ROUND GUTTERS p� '- " �' ' iJ-� ll�1 J t +.1,,',•11 'I ,i-� I.I .I, - I.,I III ,_� -_1 L-�- -r' 1_, , I ® - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -I t� 11Y' II� {"'�T' �i Ti'�I �_rr �.+.J.-+-.� "'`T'r_ ,-'I.r� l,l;l T _ JI CUSTQM WOOD WINDOWS TO MATCH EXISTING. S.D.L. J n rl, 1� jLl�Y1 `�,?"_i•?T -i�-'-, `1 a--�I+--•! _�'_.�-� i _1_„ 1 I I ..LZ-i..-, ilk,-.µ - _._.7 - T - -Y I1 I I I i .,,,1..�.T � __•1 -,-'.�, _L-:r _ ,-L, �,-1 L_ _11,1.' ;.-�,-. _, t_._ .1.'_i_.-_, _ _ _, _l�. I I_. ��.�� „ �, I , -�--_��-;� t I �,-.,� ,� ; TT_1 I •; I ;�-T�- I '`�' z!- - � . _I 71_: _ �:._ MUNTIIN BARS Wit SPACER BAR. j f i I , 1 `' I T Y _ f 1 (L ori r 7 r NEW COPPER HALF WALKVVAYS: ROUND GUTTERS IT — � —-- — BLUE STONE OR IM _ -_ _ T S ILAR NATURAL STONE. r .- _ -17 ttl i - J ' id- i i �s - 1; . T I� III ( - I - ( , II- -- ! ''MITIJIL .1_i i _ 1 �T �I r'�--^.` -�-4- rTrT-r• �I ' T ',_J_.r'____, ,_.._._(-..- 1 i � _:. I ( I I I 7 lT�T y-(`,LJL7_{ir i -1=_.' �,,�i �i�;'T.., ..I.-r �.,1 �ri,IT,f ,_LJ �Lri i;I'' ;'`Il( +-�-r; _ _I_- I•+-.-_ III TT_ -IT _ I r -1-r`-Ir-'f"�1 I,_ J- i 1 r- �l•--- - - -- - - -I - -I,-�- i � In I 1� .�f —( �- n - - -�- J_-rl--!-- ,-}�'•--1-1'-'j�-J 11 -4 - -I 5 ,'r •-I-f -r-.I�.I I' I.-III T r + 1� 1111 r FIRST FLOOR 0 I , ; 1 I i ! I i i I I L- +, 1y �'T4-4�,. Li - .. - a �!! e®i 1. elm a ®1! a �'a '�! a el.� e 1 (8 FLOOD COMPLIANT ELEVATION) hl IL > 11.,E _, e Asa e e e® a e� a es ae a ea e ® ■ e® ■ e " 'ME"a e�� a e le e� a lase. a e� ■lege e� e � e e� ems' e� a a� a "TERRACE GRADE 101'-4"® � z NEW GRADE 100'-11" _ _ _ _ _ _ III NEW GRADE 100'-11" f=EMA100YEAR FLOOD -NAVY STREET 100' - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - •- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - --- - - O 6' ELEVATION �' Ll VJ 0 V Of 1� EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 114"= IT' 0 I- 0 z -. 1 r"L it 11 11 it 11 11 11 11 1 it 11 If III 111 11 1111 11 11 1 it I[ if 11 11 11 111 if III IT if IL 11 11 or'�T 6TOPOFNEW RIDGE120'-4"- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — 11 111 [IT 11 11 If It 11 11 11 1 11 It 11 11 11 11 IL 1111 111 11 if 11 11 11 11 if 11 11 1 IT 11 11 11 1 11 11 11 if It If It 11 11 11 11 1 11 If 11 It I If 11 11 j I T_ I-,- ,T i AIF I If J Ii' II I I TOP OF NEW BEDROOM RIDGE 113'-7" � --- -- _ -- ---- IFE11 ®- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - j � I- ' if T L 1 - I I -� 4 - i - FILL!ry T'y''; � P r �11 It 11 11 it 11 ... Yt^-t?i�,71,. I.+.�. - -,'-Y--'-'T T� yF'ai' JJ I 1, �' li ail i i r I i i ! i TJI I 'r`- T 't ! { I r -j- y iii � 1� t I li' I TJ r 11 03.11.21 DS REVISIONS PER HPC COMMENTARY ul T rl fi1 L_,• _ j i� '41TSI _ BY 1 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION -- - Lal _�f, t REVISIONS - JR � � - - - -- l ` -,_' Yi 2`y1 IT IS THE RESPONSIBLITIY 0 TH - k __ 4; 7{ - _ I L . . F E CONTRACTOR I, _ _t. TO VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND COMPARE FIRST FLOOR 101'-11" 1 �i f J (8' FLOOD COMPLIANT ELEVATION) 1 t _ Jim e e ® e e e e e e e e e e e! e s e e e _ THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS LL .r-•L��-I`-r,•++.ir1 I,-I•.:-•L �-(1 ` Imo' i�TT ! j `''T ? -f, - SINEW BEEN NNNNIT INNNN NNNNN NNNNIT NNNN millions �'�-=�''t-� � _-�-� ---�— -_; �-' - "� '� e 'er e - � - ■TE CE3RA 01'-4"m - � - � BEFORE COMMENCING.ACTIVITES,ERRORS, eie —. ® e e � � e � NEW GRADE 100'-11" a ' e - - — - — - — - — f— - — - ODISCOVEREDSIGNS ORA ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES REPORTED e _ DE 1 ELY BE _ TO THE ARCHITECT k w k t --FEMA 100YEAR F - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1— -4-�f - � - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - h _ � - - ,_ _- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - 6' ELEVATION J - - - ," -- - _ �- - - — - - - - PROJECT NAME PRINCIPLE DWELLING ADDITION &ALTERATIONS ! for VINCENT BERTAULT s 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 DRAWING TITLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS x DATE 12.15.20 DRAWING NO. JOB NO. 1950 BRAWN DS SCALE:AS SHOWN A-6 U ZO N 0 RT H ELEVATION SCALE: 114„- 1 0„ BY: GRO'C z _ , REVIEWED s GARY R. O'CONNOR ARCHITECT, AIA NEW EXISTING E - - - - - - - - - - - - � N, 613 S.F. "- , 8 CORYELL STREET `' s; . II LAMBERTVI LLE, NJ 08530 �� '� �"s �^Y�`:: Y G 20554 =` it PHONE: 609.397.3635 II =T SPECIFICATION OUTLINE - _ - _ TOP OF EXISTING RIDGE HEIGHT 121'-7" ROOF: TOP OF NEW RIDGE 120_-4° — _ — _ — _ — _ — _ — _ — _ — _ — _ —_ — _ — _ _ — _ — _ — _ — _ - 1f — _ — _ — _ — _ — _ — _ — _ — _ — _ — _ — _ — _ — _ — _ — CEDAR SHINGLES, WEATHER NATURALLY. �- - - (MEAN HEIGHT OF EXISTING RIDGE 122-4") it ,-,�il'� ,I SIDING: ( CEDAR I ' � SHINGLES, WEATHER NATURALLY, _:.J.L_�_�1�-i--�'-�-�-'-:_ - - SHiN TACT,__ EXPOSED FOUNDATION: � jl I It If ; � I. If 11 1 i _ l SMOOTHI STUCCO. NEUTRAL EARTH TONE COLOR T.B.D. 11 _ 1 r — 1 T l ' F7 - - ---= I-trio _L7' - -- H_ H -- - 1 Y0JTj - �` _ _ iY� �` o'T CUSTOM WOOD WINDOWS TO MATCH EXISTING. S.D.L. 7L. I 4 I �i L i. 1 I I MUNTIN BARS W/SPACER BAR. 1 F j 1 , i T; -�-I'J--r 1 4 ^I.� - ! ,�' 'li-'._ j I t ' ,�� I' -I-�rLi ` , ;'---Ii444---' I WBLAULEKWTAYNS: -T t T' I - E OR SIMILAR NATURAL STONE. L a T 1 l iI 1. �i �I H ! 1, I I I Irl 1 , 11' ;1 , j -,-r' i F Ti 7 I T i I I 1 J 1 { I r( , `;� -'� -L I r1 I. 4-I-_r ._L7r•� L -'I - r�r=- �T l•-� '-�-r• I l_l__ 1. T 1 FLOOR 101 FIRST L '-11" r.1 r err, r , ' ' .��o.� � � � � 1 �._lo 11� ��>,_��T��_ 4 TP ( . ) y'.T..n,�.�i.�... I.l.f, !fin..• I T._;�- I�-�-,��-;' -4-I-,��--�- o, �_I_ -o' ,_ I_; � (B' FLOOD COMPLIANT ELEVATfON . e ■ -TERRACE 101--4"a ■ ■s ■ a ■ ■ ■ . ■ ■ �� ■ � ■ r' '� ' 1 I FF j- NAVY STREET GRADE 100-0 _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ -_ _ - _ - - _ I 0 FEMA 100 YEAR FLOOD - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -NAVY STREET 100'-0" - - - - - - - - - - 6' ELEVATION_ U CY_ Cn 0 V ry I 30o WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"= V-0" 0 U. i-- O z I _T1 TOP OF EXISTING RIDGE HEIGHT 121_-7_ (MEAN HEIGHT OF EXISTING RIDGE 122-4") 11 If it 11 tilt 11 lilt 11 1 It 11 If 11 1 �- 11 It 11 If - I It N 11 1 1 11 It 11 11 111 IL it - If it 11 it it it it 11 11 it if 11 11 L t i if 11 Ill I I It L 7` — I ` = . -_ , � r i' . r1..i - -' TOP ONE - - - - - - - -T'�\ -,-� W BEDROOM RIDGE 113 T l i iT'• 4 I � i I 4 �-? J 4 I - It It 11 f ; 1L ( I i �! 1 ( �1 0 ----- _I�.-,1 t L T� - _':_ L_ L I 1 t I I o;L — 1, 1 J T_ i r 11 i I , 1�i_�I 1 03.11.21 DS REVISIONS PER HPC COMMENTARY it � I i17 � 1 : f _, Q f.' 1 i� �1�'L,�-i,_ L Tv_i..l , (l 1 1' -iLsit.r!. i,.� rjs I� �r�. r�lL y ( 1 LrL��.l�-,-I, 1�-� L lyLU } ?_,... I: NO. DINE BY DESCRIPTION ' rTj?rLl IUL LLr�� l 4 T�_ L T- it REVISIONS ',�-- - I r-{--�- 1 !_-- ' -T'! Ll l,I 11 j T L.Y T'-4-L" o !. 1r IT IS THE RESPONSIBLITIY OF THE CONTRACTOR F, _ I 4 •' +.-� TO VERIFYALL FIELD - CONDITIONS AND COMPARE li ! FIRST FLOOR 101'-11" 1; _ 1�. _.x- THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (8 FLOOD COMPLIANT ELEVATION) r"i ' ill `T I I(' 'Y BEFORE COMMENCING.ACTIVITES,ERRORS, ifiee ■ ® ■ �a a ® . ® ■ ■ ®� . TERRACE 101 -4 - �-�'�'_"' ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ® ■ ® ■ ® ■ ® ■ ®' ■ "'® ■ ® ■ ® ■ ■ ® ■ ® OMMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES - --- - NEW GRADE 100-11" DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE REPORTED NAVY STREET 100'-0" - -- _` _ :_ s 'Y r . _. ;� I �I-- r� d - --•I- NAVY STREE _ TOTHEARCHITECT FEMA 100 YEAR FLOOD - - - - - � _- _ - - - _ _- - - - - - - - - - - - Y - -- ___ .: ' I I �+ - T 100'-0�� - 6' ELEVATION -- . r _ -- -. - ___. PROJECT ME PRINCIPLE DWELLING ADDITION &ALTERATIONS for I VINCENT BERTAULT � E 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 1 DRAWING TITLE € EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS R DATE 12.15.20 DRAWING NO. JOB NO. 1950 SCALE:AS SHOWN BRAWN DS A-7 4 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"= 1'-0" REVIEWED GRIO'C o NOTE:SITE PLAN INCORPORATES DATAFROM SURVEY PREPARED BY: PECONIC SURVEYORS,P.C., WILLOW STREET GARY R. ;'CON N OR SOUTHHOLD.NEW YORK 11971 ---------_ EL.4.3' DECEMBER 12,2012 --- 65.93' ARCHITECT,AIA MARCH 02,2020 ,;,, --- ----_-__-__ EL-5.2' NOVEMBER 23,2020 I+' DAMAGED STREET PARKING - B.W.5.2' `( 4""+ WILLOW TREE TO 1 - 8 CORYELL STREET NY LIC.020554 BE REMOVED. 1 1 1 /<� �1 LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 --- };'' I I I O NEW WILLOW TREE PHONE:609.397.3635 - ":� TO BE PLANTED I: PROJECT DATA ? I 1 TAX APAP 10:1000.26-01-12.2 N I I I I 4T LOT,-2 f cr/ T.W.6.8' ---J L 1 SOTIC ERSTO 19.2CO AS FILE NO.IFILED ININS.SUFFOLK CO. S.W.6.8' - OD CLERK'S OFFICE.(AFRI!19,2005 AS FILE K0.112:5. 4'-0'HIGH WD. AT VERTICAL SLAT FENCE ADDRESS: 95 NAVYSTREET -! ORIENT,NEWYORK 11957 r I I:- 1 - ZONING DISTRICT:R-40,RESIDENTIAL LOWDENSITYAA i EL.=7.8.3' A � SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE:AE•5' FROM FIRM.NO.3610300068H 09.25.2009 z �'I T 35'FRONT YARD SETBACK ____ EXISTING:25TY.PRINCIPAL FRAME DWELLING WIACCESSdRY SHED& f :.= N ° I I EXISTING 1 112 STY.FRAME 1 BARN BLDG. O I PROPOSED:-COVERED PORCH EXPANSIONS 1 STY.FRAME ADDITION BARN WI PROPOSED 1 1 BEDROOM ACCESSORY TO PRINCIPAL BLDG. I I APARTMENT 8 1 CR 1 •CHANGE USE OF SHED FROM STORAGE TO CABANA GARAGE •ACCESSORY POOL. 4'-0'HIGH WD. PREVIOUSLYAPPROVE r ! I EL.4.9' VERTICAL AT SLAT SHED AND BARN RELOCD EDI FLR.EL=8.6' PER ZBA FILE:6729 15' I I _20'_._._ 6'-0*HIGH HEDGEROW W/ .a I - T.W.9.2' I B.W.4.9' N89° VARIANCES REQUESTED: HIDDEN WIRE FENCING I S6'OO -EXPANSION OF EXISTING NON-CONFORMING FRONT YARD SEBACK 3.E"I_` EL .83 U B.W.7.83' "E 1 54.53' FOR PRINCIPAL BLDG. 1 m¢mo -_DOWN T.W.9.2' -LOCATION OF POOL IN FRONT YARD _ SHED seEL.=7.83' EL.725' T-.W�.6.r EL=6.T ---_ ZONING COMPUTATIONS . . .6 1 ¢Io p14Di EL.6.6' ZONING DISTRICT:R40 cn LOT REQUIREMENTS: REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED MIN.LOT SIZE 40,000 S.F. 19.905 S.F.' NO CHANGE MIN.LOT WIDTH 150 FT. 104 FT. NO CHANGE i i wIU 1 DN. , MIN.LOT DEPTH 175 FT. 207 FT. NO CHANGE 21., EL.7.83' 1 DN.., PRINCIPAL BUILDING MINIMUM YARD/HT REQUIREMENTS: {t I NICEL78 O 31 --- - ' Ill REQUIRED %E(STING PROPOSED FRONT YARD 35' 1.08' NO CHANGE I r SIDE YARD 10-(BOTH 25') 16.6855' 16.6'840.64' REAR YARD 35 106.5' 90' --__ 35'R 10 X INROUNDPOOL --EAR YARD SE7BgCK FOR_PRINCIPgL BLG MAX HEIGHT 35 FT 21' NO CHANGE tt 2112 STY. 2STY. NO CHANGE is --- I LARGEST FLOOR AREA(INCLUDING COVERED PORCHC 2,001 S.F. N111' 1 "I I NEW BUILDING AREA: SMS.F. ADMIN.S' I SHED FLOOD HAZARD ZONE: AE-ELEVATION•6' i T.W.B.1T NEW LLSTONE _� I EXISTING FLOOR ELEVATION: 6.5' EXISTING STONE '` FLOOR ELEVATION -- B.W.7.83' HORIZONTAL PROPOSE;FINISHED F 8' CURB WALL li _. f y^/^y ENLARGEMENT TO r \� T.W.8.17' _I L E=-B.W.4.0' '• M '- B.W.7.0' 1F�S1 STING HOUSE POWDER ACCESSORY BUILDING(BARN)MINIMUM YARD IHT.REQUIREMENTS: j b ; t'•• -^- °"}�°'�.•k'-' i..; $IL ROOM 8 WET BAR REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED y- 6 .----.-...B.W.5.2'-�+ " t �I NEW CABANA AREA:280 I SIDE YARD 15 IT&20' NO CHANGE AR SF. <, 4'-D'HIGH HEDGEROW W/�F TOTAL SIDE YARDS 25' 35' NO CHANGE I HIDDEN WIRE FENCING ., �.,�;:•. REAR YARD 20' NIA NO CHANGE " q � +L.jj-:r_Ji`"�.r,• MAX HEIGHT 22' 19-4'11.5 STY. NO CHANGE FIRST FLOOR LIVING AREA: 439 S.F.' SECOND FLOOR LIVING AREA: 302 S.F. DOWN 8.09 I TOTAL: 741 S.F. 750 S.F. Y I 6.6' I FR.GAR. �i ! I I SITE COVERAGE: EXISTING PROPOSED a ' I EXISTING DWELLING 950 S.F. T.W. EXISTING COVERED PORCH 210 S.F. I B.W.5.0' I B.W.6.6' I ( EXISTING SHED 184 S.F. w I EXISTING BARN 930 S.F. 7.0' I `C _ ICT - I IV I ON. "' I PROPOSED NEW ADDITION 613 S.F. :• I H¢m- 7.3-< UP I m PROPOSED COVERED PORCH 228 S.F. m ,/I 15:66_�. _20__ -__(6-6' i a PROPOSED POOL 220 S.F. N I Iia 7•J1 ,,r, IZ PROPOSED SHED ADDITION 96 S.F. O I Ia _ TOTAL PROPOSED 1 STY.FRAME y :I •\ DWELLLING 950 B.F. 613 S.F. 1,5635.F. • I 1 0 ADDITION.613 SO.FT. Ia CJl FR.HSE. Lot 1 �i I '� PROPOSED FLR.EL.-e' la i TOTAL BUILDING AREAS 2,274 S.F. 1,157 S.F. 3,431 S.F. �� I T.W.9.0' 2.6r UT ALLOWED EXISTING PROPOSED `I z B.W.7.0 MAX LOT COVERAGE 20% 11.4% 17.2% I z IIIA-�� EXISTING 6.6' 1} 'FRE-EXISTING NON-CONFORMING LOT PER SECTION 280-124 <sw.L�',Ir,.i ++-N nl I UTILITY I I W '• I w �I -RM, I EXISTING Q Io RECEIVED o Z I I MECHANICAL/ IN 0 U EXISTING KITCHEN MUD ROOM. I.- IT.W.9.0' I I ry 1 /T/1�� N0. DATE BY DESCRIPTION �.o' ^ .38'----- - ...;�: ">.,:.-::L., JUN G IYI REVISIONS nO I I I 35_FRONT_ _lls!TBACK FOR`PRINCIPgL^BLDG.L; 7.1 I \ I - - 'J'" MST XERESPONMITIYOFME CORIRALTOR 16.7'„ q r TT IMT TTKEWISMC�DOWA�K - _. FIE _._.__.._..-'--- a 51 �a1J BEFORE COMAENCING.ACWTES.ERRORS, GARDEN wsAISVONS OR ANYOTNER wCONSI5TEN3E5 T.W.7.3' 14' � `: Zoning `BoaYd of App TOTHEMMECLLIA.cOtAiE YBER POR EO 70 THE ARLHIIEti N EXISTING2 STY.FRAME HOUSE - T �� PROPOSED FLR.EL=8') PRa=_crR,wE PROPOSED ACCESSORY APARTMENT m I N AVERAGE SET BACK ON NAVY STREET:17.3' A t elf-16.6' VINCENT BERTAULT 0 BASED ON PECONIC SURVEYORS,P.C., PROPOSED COVER60, APRIL 25,2013 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT,NEW YORK 11957 i I PORCH EXPANSION. oRAurvcTrtlE - J `? < 228 SO.FT. " 8.6' m i T.W.6.r S LAN,P G COMPUTATIONS -------126.23' EL.4.81 t` up T.W.6.7' DATEITEP12al5w20RO NINDRAY.INGNO.AT I'x B.W.6.6' B.W.6.6 1 )ECT DATA&ZO 10 S 0 JOB NO. -- --------- ------------------ S82°49'40°w 17.86 NAVY STREET 7S86 1--p 1/�- ---- g5.71' -_-- - X66.0-- SITE PLAN SCALer=1o'-0' DRAWN DSS SCUEAsSHOm A-1 8'2 --- GARY R. O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA 8 CORYELL STREET NY LIC.020554 LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 PHONE:609.397.3635 r3 r3 A-3 A-3 12'-2' 9-4• ----- T ----- i - i I i I i i I NEW LIVING AREA —-— —-— — IST FLOOR LIVABLE AREA:439 S.F. OPEN TO BELOW I I � =! V i A 3 \ A•3 A-3 I —-— I I A 3 l ON. - �� NEWKITCHEN N UP VOL UMECEILINGSELOW 0 5'-0•HEAD HEIGHT STORAGE _ /_ 15'-0'HEAD HEIGHT in NEW BEDROOM ' I � w / 2ND FLOOR LIVABLEAREA:3025.F- I j I NEW 1 CAR NEW WORKSHOP - GARAGE , NEW BATHRODh B.1 \ __. _ __.___ ,=-� TH 'IF 5'-PHEAD HEIGHT I' ATTIC _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ L9'.EALHHEIGHT_ _.—.—...— —...—._.—..._. _._.—._._ 12-6fu• B._Svr 5'.,pL•• 15'-2-"• 110. DATE BY DESDRI%TION M3 M3 REVISIONS T IS TEE RESAO\''D COIYR--TRE CO4iR1OTOA TO.RGYALLFIEIDSTRO ldv5 N.D:OIIPASE TEEN 5aTHEOd1STACTM7ES.Em RS WTASEC`45t RN4AOTMIES.EARORS GISCOAUD d2ALY OTHERP<CR'$ISTE TE OIS[O CHSEALL Y.OJEOIa1ELY 9E REPCRTEO TDTEA avcElrcT FROIECT—E PROPOSED ACCESSORY APARTMENT lo. t BERTAULT RESIDENCE 95 NAVY STREET.ORIENT.NEW YORK 11957 c;al.ncnxLE . i PROPOSED PLANS DATE 12.15.20 DR VAIG IAD. l09 NO. 12�" DRAMA OS SDALE'AScNOYn: A-2 BY. PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE:111- -o PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE =1'.c Ill GROG " — 'r GARY R. O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA 8 CORYELL STREET NY LIC.020554 LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 -------------G` ..... - - ;��_ —-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—- PHONE:609.397.3635 TOP OF ROOF 11 9'.7* TOP OF ROOF 119- — .......... ...... ..... .............- ........... ......... .......... ........... .......... ...... .... ............- E", 7 ......... .................. T_!*]�]-T ......... ................ ........... ............. . ..... _j..................... !j i f iji 1 1 F-1 i i it FINISH FL�OCR0- _1 � FINISH FLOOR�H O_ .......... ELEVATION a 6� v ,��n,, 11 "', 1,1 (ELEVATION 8.6') iX ji ........... if Nl� '4 Fl 4 RPR Q11, p 4 r WE w ""m TNORTH ELEVATION SCALE:174'=r-0' (1)WEST ELEVATION SCALE:114"=1'.0" o-TCjl OF ROOF 119'-7' n,az —-—-—-— T ..'.......... J_ i 7,r I Ti .......... .. ......... no,� GATE DESCRIPTION ............ . ....... ................... T, REVISIONS ................ ........... i FINISH FLOOR . . ................ ......... ........... Y (�LLVATL.NMr*� FINISH FLOOR iNEEMTNS — CTOR TO��FDCONDMNSADZ _ L t ELEVATION 86 THENJ MTH THE CGHSTRUCUONDOCUMENTS_ BEFORE CDFANENCING.ACTMTES,ERRORS, � S 'Al SIONSORMYOTHERMCONSISTE-ES TOTHE.CHITECT DINCOVBRED S-1-DIATELYBE REPORTED PROJECT N&.E PROPOSED ACCESSORY APARTMENT % Z' SERTAULT RESIDENCE 95NAW STREET,ORIENT,NEW YORK 11957 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ZonIng Board of AppDATE 12.15.20 DRAWING NO. JOB NO. 1259 DRA4W 05 SCALE:AS S4O.N A-3 BY. (�)SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE:114-1--0- 4 EAST ELEVATION SCALE:114-=P-0- RE'IEM By, GRO'C Revisions _ ! 06-13-97 1 04-01-99 _ i ' 10-30-00 03-21-051 t iO w3ei.eaz �y �'� s 04-22-02 12-17-03 1 �' \ l' ,., - 7 l� 06-22-04 - •l i y, d „•.!- \ FOR PCL.NO:, 08-19-04 3 6 v 89 l '4 SEE SEC.NO:, ` 04-25-05 \ 1 m = ,p S� (451 s N R1 �l 025-04011.9 n1 03-01-07 ". � 170. �� y � 33 -61_m2808IN 09-17-1521 W OAl 05-24-19 9 lq1 13 _ 11 32.1 ` NP 2501 l< �. .� 24 -pm 29 30 �u �- 28 width 021 '•1`� 27 �m 37 '£, s 26 56 38 ° • "'. -, i 6 23 • 35 39.7 s 1.0A 22 13 zo.,v s KING „a12 o a tl 3 P3j � 15 39.12 \ � 1 y $ TO 10 1+v1 ,• - �, 3917 ti 3 •� ` nsi � 1.OA1C139. , 1w /7 30 23 ;, -.per . �'•, ��,,�:"� m 24 \ c37 N356,dB2 : \ LNIESS DRAWN OTHERWSE.ALL PROPE-E5 SHgOED AFEA IS OJ ME THIS—I(N NAP �, p�pym�a Lire pati N¢ 23 E AFE 0L IN THE FOt1OWNO TROTS'. 6wx� E '�.,.�I D__ Oeea Area 12.1 A(E)Ot 12.1Ab� G SWOOL ;5 _ _ WDRLANT �yi.u� __—___ Cunur.�Aw 12.1 A(G) a`5 ne J.1n.m Latxu^e E IGHT nn WATER T —— N PARK H5 _ P REEUSE _ _ IBup M. (Zi) SmIeAOirc m eu ' `QY61 D SEWER NA _ _s_ STI—ER_ _ _vav,_ �.m l,rc �� Nl�oyeL n. -----