Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7046SE ti J��o�.J� /Y1A.�`r► �-..ate �S'0 c�-f�-�o t�{ � s+Yu.4- 0. J�o r-ODM f-W- POO( aFLkrrz!sui'cec(- ;� - rpt- >c Sic• � _ - - ,. �; 5 el C)sp-,,�a > i CHECK BOXES AS COMPLETED SCS i ( ) Tape this form to outside of file ( ) Pull ZBA co of ` copy ND v 0• y O cc 0 ( ) Check file boxes for. C Q j ( ) Assign next number '" N outside of file'folder c A I ( ) Date stamp entire o Cn CA file number r v p; u, vX � m .Q ;o. M 0) m I ? ( ) Hole punch entire of -=a, 0 -� 3 o cr r "' 1, (before sending to T < o � w w ., < o Create new index ca` w m ( ) Print contact info & 6) :�=�"� NCDMCD O5 3 cn 7'td i ( ) Prepare transmittal; Cr Send original applic� o �' ;:71. ' o w m _ M to Town Clerk 0 t ( ) Note inside file folds u! and tape to inside - ; ( ) Copy County Tax,M . c°, ((" neighbors and.AG I' pFtp ( ) Make 7 copies and i ( ) Do mailing label Cal x-11 I 1* - P a-j � )►� N� wes UR -Fa be L P�S 5i BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ��®� �®�Ti�® 53095 Main Road•P.O. Box 1179 Az® -, 1�10 Southold,NY 11971-0959 r, Patricia Acampora /��� �,> Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. �� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento ®l�+C®U9� Southold,NY 11971 P RECEIVED http://southoldtownny.gov ,' C 12.W0 yv\ ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DEC - 6 2021 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD - n va Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax (631)765-9064 S l:hold Town Clerk FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF DECEMBER 2,2021 ZBA FILE No.: 7046SE NAME OF APPLICANT: 56655 Main St. LLC(The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant). PROPERTY LOCATION: 56655 Main Road, Southold,NY SCTM No. 1000-63-3-15 SEQRA DETERMINATION: Type 1 Action - The Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals, as Lead Agency, at the conclusion of their coordinated review classified the proposed Action for the construction of a 44-unit hotel,including 4 detached cottages with accessory outdoor swimming pool and conversion of a two-story single family dwelling to a 74-seat restaurant on a 6.75 acre parcel located in the Hamlet Business Zoning District(hereinafter referred to as the"Proposed Action"), as a Type I Action,pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617 pursuant to Article 8 of the New York Environmental Conservation Law entitled"State Environmental Quality Review Act. In 2017,the ZBA assumed the role of lead agency on this application,classified the project as a Type I action under SEQRA, and found that the project had the potential to result in one or more potential significant environmental impacts if not properly mitigated. A Positive Declaration was issued by the ZBA on November 16, 2017 requiring the preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement. The ZBA conducted a coordinated review with involved agencies and issued a Final Scope dated April 19, 2018 for the required Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS.) The applicant submitted a DEIS dated April 2019 to the ZBA, which was revised pursuant to ZBA comments and the last revised DEIS,dated October 2019,was determined to be adequate with respect to its scope and content for the purpose of filing, distribution, and commencing public review. A DEIS Notice of Completion was published in the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Environmental Notice Bulletin (ENB) on October 16, 2019 providing a public comment period until November 18, 2019 A public hearing was held on November 7,2019,and the ZBA elected to extend the written comment period to December 9, 2019; The Applicant prepared a Final Environmental Impact Statement ("FEIS") in response to comments and questions received during the document review period and, after several revisions,on August 19,2021,the ZBA accepted the revised FEIS as complete,provided a 22-day public and agency consideration period (August 20, 2021 through September 10, 2021), and a Notice of FEIS completion and acceptance was published in the ENB on September 1, 2021; A SEQRA Findings Statement for the proposed action was prepared by the Zoning Board's planning consultant, Nelson, Pope, & Voorhis, that was found to adequately reflect the findings and Page 2,December 2,2021 #7046 SE,The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant SCTM No. 1000-63-3-15 conclusions of the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals and that complies with the Decision- Making and Findings Requirements set forth by§ 617.11 of 6 NYCRR Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review. At the October 7,2021 Regular Meeting of the Board of Appeals, a resolution was read into the record and adopted by vote of the Board accepting the SEQRA findings statement for the Proposed Action, and a copy of the Statement of Findings was filed at the Southold Town Hall, made available to the public,posted on the Town's official website,and distributed to the Applicant and all Involved Agencies. Additional comments submitted by Involved Agencies can be found in the applicant's SEQR file and the Town's Laserfiche Weblink website. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23,and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated February 22, 2017 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. The Agency further commented that the Town should require that the applicant consult with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services to ensure compliance with applicable Sanitary Code requirements, and if appropriate advise the applicant of sources of transferable development rights(TDRs),and or accepted innovative/alternative sanitary on-site wastewater treatment systems, that may be available in order to comply with Health Department and Groundwater Management Zone Standards. In a Suffolk County Department of Planning letter dated July 31,2017,the department stated that as a SEQRA Involved Agency that it reserved the right to comment on the Proposed Action in the future and requested to be kept informed of all actions taken. LWRP DETERMINATION:The relief,permit,or interpretation requested in this application is listed under the Minor Actions exempt list and is not subject to review under Chapter 268. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The subject property is a conforming 6.725-acre parcel located in the Hamlet Business (HB) Zoning District on the north side of Main Road, (NY State Route 25)90 feet+/-west of the intersection of Main Road and Town Harbor Lane,across from a 7- Eleven convenience store. The property address is 56655 Route 25/Main Road, Southold, the tax map number is Section 63, Block 3, Lot 15. The parcel is irregularly shaped and measures 191.30 feet fronting State Road 25 along the southerly property line. The parcel measures 932.78 feet along the easterly property line, and measures 415.71 feet along the northerly property line bordering property owned by the Long Island Rail Road. The property line turns south 51.34 feet and turns east for 59.72 feet before turning south measuring 616.57 feet along the westerly property line. The property line then turns east for 193.10 feet along the southerly property line and turns south for 178.00 feet and meets back up with NYS State Road 25.The parcel is improved with an existing two story framed residence,a one-story frame garage,and two sheds as shown on the survey prepared by John Minto L.S. dated July 7,2016. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Special Exception to construct a 44-unit, 2 story hotel, including four detached cottages on as 6.75-acre parcel. Plans also include the conversion of an existing two-story single-family dwelling into a 74-seat restaurant. SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUESTED: Description of Action: The proposed application involves the conversion of an existing detached single-family residence, which was formerly a bed and breakfast,to a 74-seat restaurant and the construction of a two-story,40-unit hotel and four detached cottages. As part of the proposed conversion of the single-family home, the applicant is proposing to connect the structure to an existing adjacent shed by way of a 519±-square foot(SF)addition, for Page 3,December 2,2021 #7046 SE,The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant SCTM No. 1000-63-3-15 a total gross floor area(post-conversion and expansion) of 3,806± SF (excluding 524± SF of cellar space). An existing one-story detached garage will remain and will be used for storage, while a second existing shed will be removed. The proposed restaurant will provide 3 8 dedicated off-street parking spaces to the north and west of the restaurant consisting of 27 asphalt paved spaces (two of which will be ADA accessible spaces)and 11 grassed spaces. The proposed two-story hotel building will be situated in the rear of the subject property behind the restaurant. The proposed L-shaped hotel is,proposed to contain 40 rooms ranging in size from 500 SF to 540 SF. Four(4)detached cottages, each with an area of 594 SF, are proposed to the north of the hotel building. The proposed hotel use will include associated appurtenances, including an outdoor in-ground swimming pool, poolside cabanas, a small decorative pond, outdoor rooftop lounge, and basement spa including pool for use by overnight hotel guests only and during agreed upon hours. Also proposed is a possible future one-story enclosed event space to the south of the hotel building which was not evaluated in the FEIS-as a catering hall and any use of this space must remain clearly accessory and incidental to the proposed hotel use. Parking for the proposed hotel and large events is proposed to be located to the north and west of the hotel building and will consist of a total of 122 spaces, including 96 asphalt spaces, four of which will be ADA accessible, and 26 grass spaces. Access to the hotel and restaurant is proposed to be one-way-in via an existing curb cut to the east of the restaurant,and egress will be one-way out over an exit driveway on the west side of the restaurant. The proposed action also includes the construction of a sewage treatment plant (STP) to serve the proposed project, which will be situated at the northeasterly side of the subject properly. The STP has a total designed capacity of 10,695 gpd and 100% plant and leaching pool expansion areas are provided as required.The proposed STP control building will be 10 feet-by-23-feet and one story in height. The STP will be fenced by an 8.5-foot-high chain link fence with slats and vegetative screening, and STP lighting has been designed to provide essential lighting without light trespass, glare or other light related impacts on adjoining properties. An existing on-site irrigation well located near the proposed restaurant will be used as the source for on-site landscape irrigation. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: If the Zoning Board of Appeals were to deny the Special Exception Permit for the proposed permitted hotel use.The applicant's alternate plan contained in Appendix M of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement would include the conversion of the existing residence to a 74-seat restaurant use (as of right and the same as the proposed action)and the construction of a one-story,30,650 SF non-medical office building. THE LIMITATION OF LARGE(AND/OR SPECIAL EVENTS ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: Large events" at the proposed hotel are defined in the FEIS and by the applicant as events such as weddings,fundraising events or other private gatherings with a capacity of 100 guests to a maximum of 250 guests, to be held indoors, at the hotel (also referred to as "Special Events" in the Draft and Final EIS). In the FEIS the occurrence of large events was limited by the Lead Agency(ZBA)to no more than 10 large events per year and no more than one large event per week,to be held only indoors to mitigate noise. It was noted that the large events proposed at the subject site do not meet the definition of"Special Events"pursuant to Chapter 205(Public Entertainment and Special Events)of the Town Code and are not regulated as such. Further, in the FEIS no "Special Events" as defined by Chapter 205 of the Town Code are permitted at the property. Page 4,December 2,2021 #7046 SE,The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant SCTM No. 1000-63-3-15 At the October 14, 2021 hearing the applicant's Traffic Engineer Ron Hill, a principle of Dunn Engineering, stated in his testimony that "The operations of the Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant will not impact traffic. The traffic impact study will also evaluate the potential for traffic impact special events up to 250 persons ten times per year no more than once a week. That study continues (inaudible) occurring on a summer Saturday afternoon during peak summer traffic. Our analysis included that some increases in delay would occur in particularly increases in delay for traffic exiting the site. The independent consultant requested we do a gap study to verb that that was likely to happen; we did that, they reviewed it, and they determined that if we had an event of over 100 individuals, we would need traffic control to help our traffic get in and out. With events of less than 100, they said it would be minimal traffic impact and didn't need traffic control." (See transcript page 19) Numerous letters and petitions were received by the ZBA from members of the public, particularly those living in the neighborhood, objecting to the proposed project, citing concerns over the traffic and noise impacts the hotel and proposed large events would generate, and the adverse impacts to the local nearby beach within the Southold Park District should hotel guests be permitted to use it. Also of great concern by residents was the perceived increase in traffic that has occurred since the applicant's traffic engineer conducted the most recent traffic study. Particularly cited was the dangerous traffic conditions caused by cars pulling into and out of the small parking lot at the 7- Eleven Convenience store across from the subject property and the impacts to two residential side streets. While the FEIS limited the annual numbers of large events to 10 indoor events per year and required a Southold Town Police Department traffic control officer for those events as mitigation of large to moderate impacts,smaller impacts remain a concern.Although the residents' letters and oral testimony at hearings expressing concerns for safety and quality of life were grounded in personal experiences and not empirical data, the Board believes they have merit. A Board may rely on the detailed personal knowledge of residents (see Witkovich v. Zoning board of Appeals of Town of Yorktown, 84 Ad3d 1101, 923 NYS2d 645 (2d Dept 2011). In addition,the Board members, based om their own their personal knowledge of the area and the current changes in traffic conditions on Main Road (Route 25) following the traffic studies relied upon in the FEIS, also believe that large events will have a negative impact on the area. The Board members are aware of the increase in traffic accidents and congestion at the 7-Eleven convenience store, in part caused by no unloading area available in the small parking lot for very large delivery trucks that regularly park on the road shoulder and block sight lines for oncoming vehicles. The members of a Zoning Board of Appeals may also rely on their own personal knowledge of an area in rendering a determination (see Thirty West Park Corp.v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Long Beach,43 AD3 d 1069,843 NYS2d 106 (2d Dept 2007). At the October 14,2021 hearing the project architect,Andrew Giambertone,a part owner in the hotel and restaurant, stated in his testimony that the "Enclaves Hotel was not designed to be a catering hall... It's counterintuitive to the guests that we're hoping to attract on the weekends." "It is the intent that small events shall take place at the restaurant and not inside the hotel space." Further Mr. Giambertone stated that "the larger event space may not be built. ...If it makes sense business wise, we would entertain building the larger events space for parties of 100 to 250 but otherwise we may forego it." (See transcript page 53). On October 9, 2021 the Board received a letter from Andrew Giambertone in which he addressed the Business Environment/Financial Viability of the proposed project in reply to concerns by residents that questioned the financial viability of the project as proposed. He states "Even with a 50%occupancy we can sustain the viability of this development project....We would not embark on an investment of this magnitude without conducting the requisite due diligence to assure ourselves Page 5,December 2,2021 #7046 SE,The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant SCTM No. 1000-63-3-15 of the success of the project, in the context of a very conservative analysis.... Further... the purpose of(large events]is to help offset the anticipated off-season reduction in business." CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD: The neighborhood contains a mix of residential and business properties. In the vicinity of the proposed restaurant and hotel there are single-family dwellings, agricultural land, a 7/Eleven convenience store, a small car dealership, boutique restaurants, boutique stores, a parcel with marine storage, and the Long Island Rail Road. At the October 14, 2021 hearing the project architect/hotel and restaurant partner presented several depictions of the restaurant and hotel as seen from the public view on NY State Road 25. The architect did not present any renderings of the future event space; therefore, this board is unable to determine how the proposed hotel with event space will be designed and whether it's appearance will be visible to public view and be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on November 7,2019 and again on October 14,2021 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: The Board has reviewed the General Standards governing Special Exception uses set forth in Section 280-142 and finds: A. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adiacent properties or of properties in adiacent use districts. As set forth, the FEIS and Findings Statement provide conditions to mitigate possible impacts from noise and traffic resulting from the proposed action. For example, the FEIS and Findings Statement provide that there should be no outside amplified music or outside events to mitigate against noise,and that the number and size of large events be limited. Although the FEIS did examine and provide mitigation for traffic caused by what has been previously defined as "large events", the Boards finds that, based upon its own personal knowledge and the testimony of residents who live near the subject property,that traffic studies relied on in the FEIS do not adequately account for the drastic change in traffic patterns in the area since the last traffic study by the applicant's traffic engineer was completed. Consequently, the Board now also finds, based on the increase in traffic and congestion, that large events of more than 100 people that would require a traffic control officer will prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties. Therefore,the Board has determined that the proposed hotel and the destination traffic such use will generate, will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties provided there is an additional condition that no large events of more than 100 people are allowed at the subject property. B. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the district wherein the proposed use is to be located or of permitted or legally established uses in adiacent use districts.As set forth above,with the mitigation provided for in the FEIS and Findings Statement along with the additional Page 6,December 2,2021 #7046 SE,The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant SCTM No. 1000-63-3-15 condition imposes herein, including that there be no large events at the property,the Board has determined that the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the district wherein the requested use is located or of permitted or legally established uses in adjacent use districts. C. That the safety,the health,the welfare,the comfort,the convenience or the order of the Town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location. The Board has determined that with the aforementioned mitigation measures and conditions that the proposed hotel use will not have a detrimental effect on the safety, health, welfare,comfort, and convenience. D. That the use will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes and intent of Chapter 280. The proposed hotel is an anticipated use in the HB Zone District per Town Code and meets an existing demand.Rather than visitors traveling by car for"day trips," the proposed hotel would allow for guests to overnight for one or several days.Upon implementation of the proposed action, it is expected that most visitors would frequent the Hamlet Center businesses,taking advantage of the hamlet's walkability and diverse business offerings. In addition,the proposed use will provide an alternative to Air BNB type rentals and will help lessen the stress that the short-term rental of single-family homes puts on available housing stock. E. That the use will be compatible with its surroundings and with the character of the neighborhood and of the community in general, particularly with regard to visibility, scale and overall appearance. There was testimony during the public hearings that the proposed hotel will not be characteristic of the neighborhood in size, scale, or architectural design. There is only one other"hotel/restaurant"on Main Road in the Hamlet of Southold, operated as a boutique inn with only four guest rooms on the second floor,above a restaurant in an old residential looking building However,the proposed screening and the distance the hotel is proposed to be setback from the street will mitigate any potential impacts from the size, scale or architectural design. F. That all proposed structures, equipment and material shall be readily accessible for fire and police protection. The hotel as proposed as well as all associated structures, equipment and material will be readily accessible for fire and police protection. G. That the proposal shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 236, Stormwater Management. As part of the required site plan process,the proposed action will be required to comply with the requirements of Chapter 236 In making such determination,consideration was also given to: A. The character of the existing and probable development of uses in the district and the Peculiar suitability of such district for the location of any of such permitted uses. Given the size of the subject property,the proposed screening, and the setback of the proposed buildings from the street,and the above referenced mitigation and conditions,the proposed hotel will not have a negative effect on the character of the existing and probable development of uses in the district. B. The conservation of property values and the encouragement of the most appropriate uses of land. According to the applicant's market value study by Breslin Appraisal Co. Page 7,December 2,2021 #7046 SE,The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant SCTM No. 1000-63-3-15 dated October 14,2021: "The proposed hotel would serve as a catalyst for existing businesses to extend evening operating hours and potentially encourage the development of new businesses... "concluding that "the applicant's intended hotel/restaurant use will not adversely impact property values in that it is a contemplated use and one expected to be located in this location." C. The effect that the location of the proposed use and the location that entrances and exits may have upon the creation or undue increase of vehicular traffic congestion on Public streets,highways or sidewalks to assure the public safety. The proposed Hotel use will not have a negative impact on traffic and congestion provided the aforementioned mitigation and conditions are made a part of any approval. D. The availability of adequate and proper public or private water supply and facilities for the treatment,removal or discharge of sewage,refuse or other effluent(whether liquid,solid,gaseous or otherwise)that may be caused or created by or as a result of the use. The applicant has proposed adequate and proper private water supply and facilities for the treatment,removal or discharge of sewage,refuse or other effluent. The applicant is proposing to dig a private well for irrigation and to use draught tolerant plantings in its landscape plan. The applicant will build an on-site sewage treatment plant to effectively mitigate pollution from sewage from the hotel and restaurant use. E. Whether the use or the materials incidental thereto or produced thereby may give off obnoxious gases,odors,smoke or soot. The use or the materials incidental thereto will not give off obnoxious gases, odors, or soot F. Whether the use will cause disturbing emissions of electrical discharges,dust,light, vibration or noise. The hotel use will not have any exterior amplified music or other amplified sounds. All exterior lighting must be Dark Skies compliant as determined by the Southold Town Planning Board during the required site plan review and approval process. G. Whether the operation in pursuance of the use will cause undue interference with the orderly enioyment by the public of parking or of recreational facilities,if existing or if Proposed by the Town or by other competent governmental agencies. The hotel use of Southold Town Park District properties was referred to the Park District. The Park District expressed no concerns about the proposed use and stated that any issues would be addressed through their by-laws, and the applicant has agreed to abide by their decision in a letter dated October 29,2001 from Andrew Giambertone, architect and partner. H. The necessity for bituminous-surfaced space for purposes of off-street parking of vehicles incidental to the use and whether such space is reasonably adequate and appropriate and can be furnished by the owner of the plot sought to be used within or adiacent to the plot wherein the use shall be located. All parking for the hotel and restaurant guests shall be on site. I. Whether a hazard to life,limb or property because of fire,flood,erosion or panic may be created by reason of or as a result of the use or by the structures to be used therefor or by the inaccessibility of the property or structures thereon for the convenient entry and operation of fire and other emergency apparatus or by the undue concentration or assemblage of persons upon such plot. There is nothing in the record before the Board to indicate that there is a hazard to life, limb or property because of Page 8,December 2,2021 #7046 SE,The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant SCTM No. 1000-63-3-15 fire, flood, or erosion or that panic may be created by reason of or as a result of the use or by the structures to be used therefor or by the inaccessibility of the property or structures thereon for the convenient entry and operation of fire and,other emergency apparatus or by the undue concentration or assemblage of persons upon such plot. J. Whether the use or the structures to be used will cause an overcrowding of land or undue concentration of population. The proposed hotel will not cause an overcrowding of land or an undue concentration of population. K. _Whether the plot area is sufficient,appropriate and adequate for the use and the reasonably anticipated operation and expansion thereof. The proposed density of the hotel and restaurant use conforms to the bulk schedule requirements specified in Southold Town code. L. Whether the use to be operated is unreasonably near to a church,school,theater, recreational area or other place of public assembly. The proposed use is not unreasonably near to a church, school,theater,recreational area or•;other place of public assembly. M. Whether the site of the proposed use is particularlv suitable for such use. The site is 6.75 acres located in Southold's business district. It is conforming to Town Code bulk schedule in the size of the building,number of permitted uses,and number of hotel units. N. Whether adequate buffer yards and screening can and will be provided to protect adjacent properties and land uses from possible detrimental impacts of the proposed use. The applicant will plant 10-12-foot-tall Leland Cypress or equivalent evergreen screening on the East side of the property to screen the parcel from adjacent residential properties.The front of the property is also screened to limit the visibility of the hotel from the street. O. Whether adequate provision can and will be made for the collection and disposal of stormwater runoff,sewage, refuse and other liquid,solid or gaseous waste which the proposed use will generate. The applicant has plans to contain all stormwater runoff in drywells as stated in the drainage plan. The applicant will build an onsite sewage treatment system. The applicant will hire a private carting service to dispose of solid waste. P. Whether the natural characteristics of the site are such that the proposed use may be introduced there without undue disturbance or disruption of important natural features,systems or processes and without risk of pollution to groundwater and surface waters on and off the site. There are no unique natural features on the site such as wetland or steep contours. The site plan will have construction mitigation and requirement that all stormwater be maintained on site. The proposed use can be developed without undue disturbance or disruption of important natural features, systems or processes and without risk of pollution to groundwater and surfaces waters. Q. The issuance of a Special Exception permit, as applied for in this application, is also subiect to the following specific criteria and requirements which have been met pursuant to Section 280-45B(2)and 280-35B(4) of the Town Code: Page 9,December 2,2021 #7046 SE,The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant SCTM No. 1000-63-3-15 Transient hotels or motels,resort hotels or motels or conference facilities,provided that the following requirements are met: a. Minimum parcel size shall be five acres. (Minimum size is three acres in HB Zoning District). The property measures 6.75 acres. b. The maximum number of guest units shall be: a) One unit per 6,000 square feet of land without public water or sewer. b)One unit per 4,000 square feet of land with public water and sewer. c. A Sewage Treatment Plant(STP) is proposed. d. No music, entertainment or loudspeaker system shall be audible from beyond the property line. e. The maximum size of a guest unit shall be 600 square feet The room sizes measure between 500 to 540 sq. ft.;the cottage measure 594 sq. ft. R. The Board has identified mitigation of relevant adverse impacts to the ecological and social environment in the accepted State Environmental Quality Review Finding Statement of October 2021. BOARD RESOLUTION: In considering all of the above factors, motion was offered by Member Weisman(Chairperson), seconded by Member Planamento, and duly carried to GRANT, a Special Exception Permit, as shown on the Site Plan prepared by PWGC/P.W. Grosser Consulting Engineer, last revised February 18,2021, (Sheets 1-16,unstamped and unsigned). SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. That the applicant complete construction on the hotel and begin the approved Special Exception use in compliance with the conditions imposed by the Zoning Board of Appeals within three years.The Board of Appeals may,upon written request prior to the date of expiration, grant an extension. 2. In accordance with the Zoning Board of Appeals, approval shall thereafter be deemed a lawful use as if the same were permitted by chapter 280 without need for a special exception permit;provided,however,that: a. All conditions imposed by the special exception approval shall continue to apply unless they, by their express terms, are of limited duration. b. All conditions imposed on special exception approval uses generally or specifically by Chapter 280 shall continue to apply,regardless of whether any such conditions were expressly incorporated into the special exception approval. c. The Zoning Board of Appeals shall retain continuing jurisdiction over the same. d. A special exception use which has been discontinued for a period of one year or more shall be deemed abandoned e. The applicant must apply to the Planning Board for site plan review/approval within 60 days of the date of this decision. Failure to do so will render this Special Exception Permit null and void, unless a written extension is granted by the ZBA upon written request of the applicant for good cause. 3. As a condition of approval,the applicant shall file Covenants and Restrictions(C&R's) acceptable to the Southold Town Attorney that shall remain in force and effect so long as the approved Special Exception use as a hotel is operational stating that: Page 10,December 2,2021 #7046 SE,The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant SCTM No. 1000-63-3-15 1. No outdoor events of any size shall be permitted on the subject property. 2. No special events as defined in Chapter 205 (Public Entertainment and Special Events) of the Town Code shall be permitted on the subject property. 3. No large events, defined in the FEIS as events over 100 guests, are permitted on the subject property. Small indoor events that are accessory and incidental to the principal hotel use shall be permitted. Small events are defined as events under 100 guests. 4. No expansion of the number of approved hotel units shall be permitted 5. Proposed hotel amenities including but not limited to the indoor pool, spa and fitness facility,the outdoor pool,hot tubs and cabanas, and the roof top bar/lounge, are limited to use by overnight hotel guests only as accessories to the principal hotel use and shall not be available for use by the general public. 6. No outdoor music is permitted anywhere on the subject property. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. NOTE: Violations of Conditions. A violation of any limitation or condition of a special exception approval or of any provision of this chapter applicable to a special exception use shall constitute a violation of this chapter. The Zoning Board of Appeals shall retain jurisdiction and shall have the right, after a public hearing, to modify, suspend or revoke such approval or any term or condition thereof or to impose thereon one or more new conditions,pursuant to Article XXV, Section 280-141 of the Town Code. Vote of the Board: Ayes:Members Weisman(Chairperson),Dantes,Planamento and Lehnert. - Nays: Member Acampora. This Resolution was duly adopted(4-1). ies2i,*41ane's/W�eisman, Chairperson Approved for filing I Zr U /2021 Zft 13 P--Tcp_, BOARD MEMBERS ��®F SU(/j�o Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson ,`O �® 53095 Main Road • P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes �pQ Town Annex/First Floor, l Robert Lehnert,Jr. 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento U01 Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 EXTENSION DETERMINATION Special Meeting of November 21, 2024 ZBA FILE No.: 7046SE NAME OF APPLICANT: 56655 Main St. LLC (The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant). PROPERTY LOCATION: 56655 Main Road, Southold,NY 1000-63-3-15 BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Special Exception to construct a 44-unit, 2 story hotel, including four detached cottages on as 6.75-acre parcel. Plans also include the conversion of an existing two-story single-family dwelling into a 74-seat restaurant. SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUESTED: Description of Action: The proposed application involves the conversion of an existing detached single-family residence, which was formerly a bed and breakfast,to a 74- seat restaurant and the construction of a two-story, 40-unit hotel and four detached cottages. DATE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS: November 7, 2019 and October 14, 2021 Request for a Special Exception was originally Granted, subject to conditions, on December 2, 2021. On November 7, 2024, David Altman, Attorney at Law, on behalf of his clients, requested an extension of the above-mentioned action. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: A motion was offered by Member Weisman (Chairperson) seconded by Member Dantes, and duly carried, to GRANT, the applicant's request that the above cited determination be extended to expire on December 2, 2025, as per Chapter 280-146 of the Code of the Town of Southold. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Planamento,Lehnert,Weisman,Acampora, and Dantes. This Resolution was duly adopted (5-0). Ire she Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing l /��2024 •�., B R D W N 538 BROADHOLLOW ROAD ( SUITE 301 / ......................... MELVILLE, NEW YORK 1 1 747 ALTMAN & ........................................................................._........................ .. D 1 L E O , L L P TEL 51 6-222-0222 FAX 51 6-222-0322 ... _... ...... ...... KBDA@O BROWNALTMAN.COM ( WWW.BROWNALTMAN.COM November 7, 2024 RECEIVED VL4 FEDERAL EXPRESS Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Zoning Board of Appeals, Town of Southold NOV Zo2 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Southold,NY 11971 - Re: Application by 56655 Main Street LLC (the "Applicant")for an extension of the December 6, 2021, Special Exception Approval (the "Approval") granted by the Southold(the"Town")Zoning Board ofAppeals("ZBA")w/respect to The Enclaves Hotel (the "Project") located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, NY(the "Property"); SCTMNo.: 1000-063.00-03.00-015.000 ZBA File No.: 7046SE Our File No.: 100-513-001 Dear Chairperson Weisman and fellow Members of the ZBA: Our office represents the Applicant in this matter. The Applicant hereby requests a two(2) year extension of the Approval or such longer period as the ZBA permits.1 A copy of the Approval is annexed hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit 1. Condition numbered "l" of the Approval requires the Applicant to complete construction of the Project and begin the approved use within three (3) years of the date of the Approval, to wit, December 6, 2021. (See Exhibit "1", p. 9.) Condition numbered "l" further provides that the "Board of Appeals may, upon written request prior to the date of expiration, grant an extension." (See Exhibit "l", p. 9.) There has been.no material change of circumstance since the Approval such that the extension sought by the Applicant herein should.be granted by the ZBA. Following this Board's Approval, on December 22, 2021, the Applicant submitted its preliminary site plan application("SP App.")with supporting documentation to the Town Planning Department ("PD"). On February 28, 2022, the Planning Board ("PB") accepted the SP App. as complete for review. On April 5, 2022,the PB distributed the SP App. for department review and comment. Thereafter,on April 11,2022,a public hearing concerning the SP App.was held before the PB. Between May 3, 2022, and August 8, 2022, municipal agencies and/or departments, including the Town Architectural Review Committee, Suffolk County Planning Commission, Town Engineer, etc., submitted comments with requested revisions (hereinafter, "Departmental Comments")to the Applicant's site plans. On November 29,2022,the Project engineer submitted revised site plans to the PD addressing the Departmental Comments. I On December 6,2021,the ZBA granted the Approval to the Applicant for the Project,consisting of a 44-unit,2 story hotel, with four(4) detached cottages at the Property, along with the conversion of an existing two-story structure fronting on Main Road into a 74-seat restaurant(the"Project"). f Ak BROWN ..........................................*---,........................... _ ALTMAN & DiLEo � L L P _.__..._........._......................_....................._..... . Another round of departmental review followed and the PB requested further revisions to the site plans. On January 9, 2023, the Project engineer submitted revised plans to the PB. Following,on January 13,2023,the PB referred the revised site plans to the Town Engineer,Chief Zoning Administrator and Fire Marshal, and on March 2, 2023, further revised site plans were submitted by the Applicant to the PB. On June 5, 2023, the PB granted Conditional Site Plan Approval of the Project (the "Conditional Approval"), imposing five (5) conditions that required satisfaction prior to the commencement of construction of the Project. A copy of the Conditional Approval is annexed hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "2".2 On January 8, 2024, the PB determined that the Conditional Approval was satisfied and on January 9, 2024, the PB issued a Resolution granting final Site Plan Approval for the Project (the "SP Resolution"). A copy of the SP Resolution is annexed hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "311.3 On January 16,2024,the Applicant promptly filed a Building Permit Application(the`BP App.") with the Building Department(the `BD"). Between March 27, 2024, and May 31, 2024, the Applicant's Project architect submitted its written responses to comments from the BD. Annexed hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit 114" is a chronology of the Project architect's responses to BD comments. Following, on June 20, 2024, the BD issued to the Applicant a Building Permit for the Project. Submitted herewith for the ZBA's convenience are Project construction progress photos as of October 25, 2024, annexed hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit 5. Respectfully,the Applicant diligently pursued the all necessary approvals and permits from the Town for the Project. Given the time required to complete the SP App. and BP App.processes, the Applicant has only been afforded less than six (6) months to undertake and complete construction of the Project,and begin the hotel use. The Applicant,therefore,respectfully requests that this Honorable Board extend the Approval as requested hereinabove. z The Conditional Approval required the Applicant to: (i) coordinate a preconstruction meeting with the Town Planning Department and Town Engineer, (ii)stake the rear and side yard setback areas for inspection by the Town Planning Department, (iii)flag trees to be retained for inspection by the Town Planning Department, (iv) prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan,acid(v) inspection by the Town Engineer of storm water runoff containment systems when installed at the Property. 3 The ZBA is respectfully referred to the SP Resolution for a chronology of the Applicant's SP App.before the PB. 2 J LROWN BROWN ALTMAN & _...._.._..._...._.....__....._- .D1LEo........... L L P If you have any questions concerning the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, in advance, for your anticipated courtesy and cooperation. Very truly yours, BROWN ALTMAN& O,L By: Da id N. Altman, Esq. Encl. cc.: Paul DeChance,Esq., Town Attorney (via electronic mail, only, w/encls.) Heather M. Lanza, Town Planning Director(via electronic mail, only w/encls.) 56655 Main Street,LLC (via electronic mail, only,w/encls.) Andrew Giambertone,R.A. (via electronic mail, only, w/encls.) r ' 3 EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT 5 l 1 I � I Progress Photos. ip r '1 .ar 3 INS;. '/ M/f" • r-�" .rim �� Yf''� ,-� � .�'r, , .-� LU r _ a ` �, i ;; � 1fi•t --� oil .:Idw `rl , tat OR I RM Oct 25, 2024 at 8:51 :03 AM 56655 Main Rd Southold NY 11971 United States 9 i y f h '624 at 9--08:32 AM 56655 Main Rd Southold NY 1,1-971 United States r i R Mon - 'ram- .,. ! • ` r 7 •S t 16 iF 410A 1� Qct 25, 2024 at 10�48�03 AM 56655 Main Rd Southold NY 11971 United States 1',6{k4t ;(te�t,ll!}M�I���11'+"„I' •�; �,�,Hr', :����I������i� � `. ,: � EXHIBIT 2 OFFICE LOCATION: MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex ��4f Sou, P.O.Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold,NY 11.971 (cor.Main Rd.&Youngs Ave.) �� !� Telephone:631 765-1938 Southold,NY 1 www.southoldtownny.gov % ® '� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 6, 2023 l Andrew V. Giambertone, AIA President Andrew V. Giambertone &Associates, Architects i 62 Elm Street Huntington, NY 11743 and David N. Altman, Esq. Brown Altman & DiLeo, LLP 538 Broadhollow Road, Suite 301 +Melville, NY 11747 Re: Conditional Approval -The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant 56655 NYS Route 25, Southold SCTM#1000-63-3-15 Zoning District: HB r Gentlemen: The following resolutions were adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on June 5, 2023: WHEREAS, this site plan is for the proposed conversion of an existing 3,026 sq. ft. residence with a 584 sq. ft. addition into a 74-seat restaurant and the construction of a hotel with 44 units, and an outdoor pool on 6.75 acres in the Hamlet Business Zoning District. The property is located at 56655 NYS Route 25, Southold. SCTM#1000-63-3-15; and WHEREAS, on October 21, 2021, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA), as Lead Agency, completed the EIS and Findings for the Type I action and Positive Declaration pursuant to State Environmental Quality Review Act(SEQRA)6 NYCRR, Part 617.A complete timeline and additional information regarding the SEQR process can be found in the Findings, Deliberations and Determination Meeting of December 2, 2021, Special Exception for 56655 Main St. LLC (The'Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant) document in Town Laserfiche; and Enclaves Hotel &Restaurant Page 2 June 6.2023 WHEREAS, on December 6, 2021, the ZBA granted Special Exception 7046SE for the proposed Hotel & Restaurant subject to numerous Conditions, and Covenants & Restrictions required to be filed with the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk; and WHEREAS, on December 22, 2021, David N. Altman, Esq., authorized agent, submitted site plans, information and materials for a Site Plan review; and WHEREAS, on January 24, 2022,the Planning Board found the application incomplete for review, requiring the submission of revised site plans and additional information for review; and WHEREAS, on February 1, 2022,Andrew Giambertone, authorized agent, submitted a portion of the revised plans and additional information as required for review; and WHEREAS, on February 3, 2022, Bryan Grogan, P.E., submitted revised plans and additional information as required for review; and WHEREAS, on February 4, 2022, staff provided comments and analysis via email regarding the plans submitted, noting their deficiencies; and WHEREAS, on February 17, 2022, Andrew Giambertone, authorized agent, submitted a portion of,the revised plans and additional information as required for review; and WHEREAS, on February 22, 2022, Bryan Grogan, P.E., submitted revised plans and additional information as required for review; and WHEREAS, on February 28, 2022, the Planning Board accepted the site plan application as complete for review; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2022, Bryan Grogan, P.E., submitted a revised Landscape Plan for review; and WHEREAS, on April 5, 2022, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Southold Town Code§280-131 C., distributed the application to the required agencies for their comments; and WHEREAS, on April 7, 2022, Southold Town Code Enforcement submitted correspondence that there were no open violations regarding the subject parcel; and WHEREAS, on April 11, 2022 the Planning Board held a public hearing for the proposed action and determined to hold the hearing open until April 25, 2021 for written comments; and WHEREAS, on April 19, 2022, David N.Altman, Esq., authorized agent, submitted correspondence and supporting exhibits on the behalf of the applicant regarding comments raised at the Public Hearing; and Enclaves Hotel & Restaurant Page 3 June 6, 2023 WHEREAS, on April 25, 2022,the written comment period was closed; and WHEREAS, on April 26, 2022, the Southold Town Fire Marshal determined certain revisions were required to provide adequate fire protection and emergency access for the site; and J WHEREAS, on May 3, 2022, the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) provided comments to be incorporated into the proposed site design and layout by the Planning Board; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2022 the Suffolk County Planning Commission (SCPC) provided comments and guidance regarding'the proposed action; and WHEREAS, on May 19, 2022, the Southold Town Engineer reviewed the proposed application and determined revisions were required in order for the site plan to meet the minimum requirements of Chapter 236 for Storm Water Management; and WHEREAS, on June 1, 2022, the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator reviewed the proposed project and determined the project to be consistent with Southold Town LWRP policies with recommendations to the Planning i Board; and WHEREAS, on June 1, 2022, the Southold Fire District determined certain revisions were required to provide adequate fire protection for the site, consistent with the Southold Town _ Fire Marshal; and WHEREAS, at a Work Session on June 22, 2022, the Planning Board reviewed the proposed application and required revisions to the Site Plan and additional information necessary, for the Site Plan to comply with various applicable sections of the Town Code as detailed in the Work Session Staff Report; and WHEREAS, on July 8, 2022, the Southold Town Engineer verified that no'NY State outfalls would-be impacted by the proposed action and therefore, no SPDES construction permit is required; and WHEREAS, on July 11, 2022, the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) provided comments to the applicant specifying the information and plans required to complete the application for Case#97500 for a Highway Work Permit; and WHEREAS, on August 8, 2022, Nelson & Pope, authorized Technical Consultant to the Planning Board, provided correspondence to the Planning Board in response to comments received during the Public Hearing; and 1 GJ Enclaves Hotel & Restaurant Page 4 June 6,2023 WHEREAS, on September 12, 2022, after careful consideration, the Southold Town Planning Board, as an involved agency for the action, adopted the Statement of Findings adopted by the ZBA on October 7, 2021, for the proposed Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant Application, pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law (State Environmental Quality Review Act) and the implementing regulations of 6 NYCRR Part 617; and WHEREAS, on November 29, 2022, Bryan Grogan, P.E., submitted revised plans as required for review; and WHEREAS, on December 1, 2022, the Planning Board referred the revised site plan to the Office of the Town Engineer for review; and WHEREAS, on December 1, 2022, the Planning'Board sent a request for Use Certification to the Chief Zoning Administrator pursuant to§280-131(F)(1); and WHEREAS, on December 5, 2022, the Planning Board reviewed the revised site plan at their work session and determined revisions and additional information were required; and WHEREAS, on December 16, 2022, the Southold Town Engineer reviewed the proposed application and determined that revisions were required in order for the site plan to meet the minimum requirements of Chapter 236 for Storm Water Management; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2022, the Planning Board reviewed the revised site plan at their work session and determined revisions and additional information were required; and WHEREAS, on December 21, 2022, Andrew Giambertone, authorized agent, submitted revised Elevations and Renderings as required for review; and WHEREAS, on January 9, 2023, Bryan Grogan, P.E., submitted revised plans as required for review; and WHEREAS, on January 13, 2023, the Planning Board referred the revised site plan to the Office of the Town Engineer for review; and WHEREAS, on January 13, 2023, the Planning Board referred the revised site plan to the Chief Zoning Administrator and Fire Marshal for review; and WHEREAS, on January 24, 2023, the Southold Town Engineer reviewed the proposed application and determined that the site plan prepared by Bryan A. Grogan, P.E.,.dated August 23, 2016 and last revised December 21, 2022, met the minimum requirements of Chapter 236 for Storm Water Management; and WHEREAS, on February 2, 2023,the Southold Town Chief Zoning Administrator reviewed and certified the proposed Hotel & Restaurant as a use permitted by Special Exception #7046SE in the Hamlet Business Zoning District; and i � Enclaves Hotel & Restaurant Page 5 June 6, 2023 WHEREAS, on March 2, 2023, Andrew Giambertone, authorized agent, submitted revised site plans for review by the Fire Marshal; and WHEREAS, at a Work Session on March 13, 2023, the'Planning Board reviewed the proposed application and required the applicant to provide a Draft Performance Guaranty (Bond) pursuant to§280-131(K), provide a completed waste water permit from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) and a Highway Work Permit from the NYSDOT as required; and WHEREAS, on April 27, 2023, Andrew Giambertone, authorized agent, submitted a Draft Bond Estimate for review as required; and WHEREAS, on May 24, 2023, Andrew Giambertone, authorized agent, submitted a revised Draft Bond Estimate that included line items and unit price for review as required; and WHEREAS, on May 31, 2023, the Southold Town Fire Marshal reviewed the proposed site plan and determined the plan to be consistent with emergency access and safety protocol requirements; and WHEREAS on June 1, 2023, the Southold Town Engineer reviewed and confirmed the Performance Guaranty Bond Estimate; and WHEREAS, at their work session on June 5, 2023, the,Planning Board reviewed and accepted the Town Engineer's estimate in the amount of$310,336.30; and WHEREAS, on June 5, 2023, the Southold Town Planning Board determined that with exception of the items listed as conditions below, all applicable requirements of.the Site Plan Regulations, Article XXIV, §280—Site Plan Approval of the Town of Southold were met; therefore be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby accepts the Bond Estimate in the amount of$310,336.30, and recommends same to the Town Board; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby finds the application consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby grants Conditional Approval regarding the Site Plan entitled "The Enclaves" prepared by Bryan Andrew Grogan, P.E. dated August 23, 2016 and last revised December 21, 2022, with the following conditions: Conditions: 1. Obtain a Highway Work Permit from the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) and provide one (1) print of the approved plan including the seal, stamp and signature of the NYSDOT to this office. Enclaves Hotel & Restaurant Page 6 June 6. 2023 Conditions Continued: 2. Obtain approval from the Suffolk County Department offHealth Services (SCDHS) and provide one (1) print of the approved plan including the seal, stamp and signature of the SCDHS to this office. 3. Submit the required Performance Guaranty(aka Bond) after the Town Board has approved the bond estimate. 4. Submit the Administration Fee of 6% of the approved bond estimate. 5. Submit at least five (5) paper copies of the Final Site Plan, Floor Plans and Building Elevations including the stamp, seal and signature of the NYS Licensed Professional preparing the plans. i The conditions listed above must be met, and an approval resolution issued by the Planning Board at a future public meeting before the site plans can be officially endorsed and before any building permits can be issued. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Respectfully, i Donald J.Wilcenski Chairman cc: Andrew V. Giambertone EXHIBIT 3 j OFFICE LOCATION: MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex 5f SO{�/ � P.O.Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 �� r'`v 'i Southold,NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd.&Youngs Ave.) Southold,NY , Telephone:631765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 9, 2024 Andrew V. Giambertone,AIA President Andrew V. Giambertone &Associates,Architects 62 Elm Street Huntington, NY 11743 and David N.Altman, Esq. 1 Brown Altman & DiLeo, LLP 538 Broadhollow Road, Suite 301 Melville, NY 11747 Re: Approval-The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant 56655 NYS Route 25, Southold SCTM#1000-63-3-15 Zoning District: HB Gentlemen: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on January 8, 2024: WHEREAS,this site plan is for the proposed conversion of an existing 3,026 sq.ft. residence with a 584 sq.ft addition, into a 74-seat restaurant and the construction of a hotel with 44 units, and an outdoor pool on 6.75 acres in the Hamlet Business Zoning District. The property is located at 56655 NYS Route 25, Southold. SCTM#1000-63-3-15; and WHEREAS, on October 21, 2021,the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA), as Lead Agency, completed the EIS and Findings for the Type I action and Positive Declaration pursuant to State Environmental Quality Review Act(SEQRA) 6 NYCRR, Part 617.A complete timeline and additional information regarding the SEAR process can be found in the Findings, Deliberations and Determination Meeting of December 2, 2021, Special Exception for 56655 Main St. LLC(The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant) document in Town Laserfiche; and Enclaves Hotel&Restaurant Page 2 of 13 January 9.2024 WHEREAS, on December 6, 2021,the ZBA granted Special Exception 7046SE for the proposed Hotel & Restaurant subject to numerous Conditions, and Covenants & Restrictions required to be filed with the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk; and WHEREAS, on December 22, 2021, David N.Altman, Esq., authorized agent, submitted site plans, information and materials for a Site plan review; and WHEREAS, on January 24,2022, the Southold Town Planning Board found the application incomplete for review,.requiring the submission of revised site plans and additional information for review; and WHEREAS, on February 1, 2022,Andrew Giambertone, authorized agent, submitted a portion of the revised plans and additional information as required for review; and WHEREAS, on February 3, 2022, Bryan Grogan, P.E.,'submitted revised plans and additional information as required for review; and WHEREAS, on February 4, 2022, staff provided comments and analysis via email regarding the plans submitted, noting their deficiencies; and WHEREAS, on February 17, 2022,Andrew Giambertone, authorized agent, submitted a portion of the revised plans and additional information as required for review; and WHEREAS, on February 22, 2022, Bryan Grogan, P.E., submitted revised plans and additional information as required for review; and WHEREAS, on February 28, 2022,the Southold Town Planning Board accepted the site plan application as complete for review; and WHEREAS, on March 10,2022, Bryan Grogan, P.E., submitted a revised Landscape Plan for review; and WHEREAS, on April 5, 2022, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Southold Town Code§280-131 C., distributed the application to the required agencies for their comments; and WHEREAS, on April 7, 2022, Southold Town Code Enforcement submitted correspondence that there were no open violations regarding the subject parcel; and WHEREAS, on April 11, 2022 the Southold Town Planning Board held a public hearing for the proposed action and determined to hold the hearing open until April 25, 2021 for written comments; and WHEREAS, on April 19, 2022, David N.Altman, Esq., authorized agent, submitted correspondence and supporting exhibits on the behalf of the applicant regarding comments raised at the Public Hearing; and r Enr&ves Hotel$Restaurant Paw 3 of 13 January 9.2024 WHEREAS, on April 25, 2022, the written comment period was closed; and WHEREAS, on April 26, 2022, the Southold Town Fire Marshal determined certain revisions were required to provide adequate fire protection and emergency access for the site; and WHEREAS, on May 3, 2022, the Southold Town Architectural Review Committee (ARC) provided comments to'be incorporated into the proposed site design and layout by the Southold Town Planning Board; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2022 the Suffolk County Planning Commission(SCPC) provided comments and guidance regarding the proposed action; and WHEREAS, on May 19, 2022, the Southold Town Engineer reviewed the proposed application and determined revisions were required in order for the site plan to meet the minimum requirements of Chapter 236,for Storm Water Management;and WHEREAS, on June 1, 2022, the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator reviewed the proposed project and determined the project to be consistent with Southold Town LWRP policies with recommendations to the Planning Board; and WHEREAS, on June 1, 2022,the Southold Fire District determined certain revisions were required to provide adequate fire protection for the site, consistent with the Southold Town Fire Marshal; and - WHEREAS, at a work session on June 22, 2022, the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the proposed application and required revisions to the site plan and additional information necessary, for the Site plan to comply with various applicable sections of the Town Code as detailed in the Work Session Staff Report; and WHEREAS, on July 8, 2022, the Southold Town Engineer verified that no NY State outfalls would be impacted by the proposed action and therefore, no SPDES construction permit is required; and WHEREAS, on July 11, 2022, the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT)provided comments to the applicant specifying the information and plans required to complete the application for Case#97500 for a Highway Work Permit; and WHEREAS, on August 8, 2022, Nelson &Pope, authorized Technical Consultant to the Southold Town Planning Board, provided correspondence to the Planning Board in response to comments received during the Public Hearing; and WHEREAS, on September 12, 2022, after careful consideration, the Southold Town Planning Board, as an involved agency for the action, adopted the Statement of Findings adopted by the ZBA on October 7, 2021,for the proposed Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant Enclaves Hotel&Restaurant Pa92 4 9f J3 January 9.2024 Application, pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law(State Environmental Quality Review Act) and the implementing regulations of 6 NYCRR Part 617; and WHEREAS, on November 29, 2022, Bryan Grogan, P.E., submitted revised plans as required for review; and WHEREAS, on December 1,2022,the Southold Tonw Planning Board referred the revised site plan to the Office of the Town Engineer for review; and WHEREAS, on December 1, 2022,the Southold Town Planning Board sent a request for Use Certification to the Chief Zoning Administrator pursuant to§280-131(F)(1); and WHEREAS, on December 5, 2022,the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the revised.site plan at their work session and determined that revisions and additional information were required; and WHEREAS, on December 15, 2022,the Southold Town Engineer reviewed the proposed application and determined that revisions were required in order for the site plan to meet the minimum requirements of Chapter 236 for Storm Water Management; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2022, the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the revised site plan at their work session and determined revisions and additional information were required; and WHEREAS, on December 21, 2022, Andrew Giambertone, authorized agent, submitted revised Elevations and Renderings as required for review; and WHEREAS, on January 9, 2023, Bryan Grogan, P.E., submitted revised plans as required for review; and WHEREAS, on January 13, 2023, the Southold Town Planning Board referred the revised site plan to the Office of the Town Engineer for review; and WHEREAS, on January 13,2023,the Southold Town Planning Board referred the revised site plan to the Chief Zoning Administrator and Fire Marshal for review; and WHEREAS, on January 24, 2023,the Southold Town Engineer reviewed the proposed application and determined that the site plan prepared by Bryan A. Grogan, P.E.,dated August 23, 2016 and last revised December 21, 2022, met the minimum requirements of Chapter 236 for Storm Water Management; and WHEREAS, on February 2, 2023, the Southold Town Chief Zoning Administrator reviewed and certified the proposed Hotel & Restaurant as a use permitted by Special Exception #7046SE in the Hamlet Business Zoning District; and r Enclaves Hotel&Restaurant Pace 5 of 13 January 9. 2024 WHEREAS, on March 2, 2023, Andrew Giambertone, authorized agent, submitted revised site plans for review by the Fire Marshal;and WHEREAS, at a work session on March 13, 2023, the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the proposed application and required the applicant to provide a Draft Performance Guaranty(Bond) pursuant to§280-131(K), provide a completed waste water permit from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services(SCDHS) and a Highway Work Permit from the NYSDOT as required;and WHEREAS, on April 27, 2023, Andrew Giambertone, authorized agent, submitted a Draft Bond Estimate for review as required; and c WHEREAS, on May 24, 2023, Andrew Giambertone, authorized agent, submitted a revised Draft Bond Estimate that included line items and unit price for review as required; and WHEREAS, on May 31, 2023, the Southold Town Fire Marshal reviewed the proposed site plan and determined the plan to be consistent with emergency access and safety protocol requirements; and WHEREAS on June 1, 2023,the Southold Town Engineer reviewed and confirmed the Performance Guaranty Bond Estimate; and WHEREAS, at their work session on June 5, 2023, the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed and accepted the Town Engineer's estimate in the amount of$310,336.30; and WHEREAS, on June 5, 2023, the Southold Town Planning Board determined that with exception of the items listed as conditions below, all applicable requirements of the Site plan Regulations, Article XXIV, §280--Site plan Approval of the Town of Southold were met; and WHEREAS, on June 5, 2023, the Southold Town Planning Board accepted the Bond Estimate in the amount of$310,336.30, and recommended same to the Town Board; and WHEREAS, on June 5, 2023,the Southold Town Planning Board found the application consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program; and . WHEREAS, on June 5, 2023, the Southold Town Planning Board granted a Conditional Approval regarding the Site plan entitled "The Enclaves"prepared by Bryan Andrew Grogan, P.E. dated August 23, 2016 and last revised December 21, 2022, with five (5) conditions to be met; and WHEREAS, on June 20, 2023, the Southold Town Board accepted the Bond Estimate by resolution as required by condition#3; and Enclaves Hotel&Restaurant Page-6 of 13 Januay 9.2024 I WHEREAS, on October 17, 2023, Andrew Giambertone, R.A., and Bryan Grogan, P.E., submitted five (5) paper copies of the Final Site Plan, Floor Plans and Building Elevations including the stamp, seal and signature of the NYS Licensed Professional preparing the plans, as required by Condition#5; and WHEREAS, on October 30, 2023, Bryan Grogan, P.E., submitted New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) Highway Work Permit#20231097500 issued October 30, 2023 through October 29, 2024 as required by Condition #1; and WHEREAS, on November 29, 2023, a $310,336.30 Performance Bond was submitted by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company with J. Petrocelli Contracting, Inc. as principal as required by Condition #3; and WHEREAS, on December 13, 2023, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) granted approval for#C-22-0081 Sewage Treatment Plant (STP), Collection System and Water Supply for Hotel & Restaurant @ 11,420gpd as required by Condition #2; and WHEREAS, on December 14, 2023, the 6%Administration Fee of$18,620.18 was submitted by J. Petrocelli Contracting, Inc. as required by Condition #4; and WHEREAS, at their work session on January 8, 2024, the Southold Town Planning Board determined that all five conditions of conditional approval had been satisfied as detailed above; therefore be it RESOLVED,that the Southold Town Planning Board grants Approval with Conditions, listed below, regarding the Site plan entitled "The Enclaves"prepared by Bryan Andrew Grogan, P.E.dated August 23, 2016 and last revised February 3, 2023 and authorizes the Chairman toendorse the plans listed below: Site plan Table of Contents Details C=001 Site plan General Notes C-400 Landscape Plan and Details C-002 Site plan Legend C-500 Site Lighting and Details C-100 Traffic Control & Parking Plan C-501 Site Lighting and Details C-101 Site Circulation Plan & Detail C-600 Site Layout and Utilities Plan C-102 Site Circulation Plan& Detail C-601 Site Layout and Utilities Plan C-103 Site Circulation Plan & Detail C-602 Site Layout and Utilities Plan C-104 Work Zone Traffic Control Plan C-700 Site Details C-200 Grading and Drainage Plan C-701 Details C-201 Grading and Drainage Plan C-702 Details C-202 Boring Plan and Boring Logs 0-800 Irrigation Plan C-300 Sediment and Erosion Control A2.1 Hotel Lower Level Plan Plan A2.2 Hotel First Floor Plan C-301 Sediment and Erosion Control A2.3 Hotel Second Floor Plan Details A2.4 Hotel Roof Plan C-302 Sediment and Erosion Control A3.1 Hotel Elevations r Enclaves Hotel&Restaurant Page 7 of 13 January 9.2024 A3.2 Hotel Elevations A3.5 Restaurant Front Elevations A2.5 Restaurant Root Cellar Floor Plan A3.6 Restaurant Right Side Elevations A2.6 Restaurant First Floor Plan A3.7 Restaurant Rear Elevations A2.7, Restaurant Second Floor Plan A3.8 Restaurant Left Side Elevations A2.8 Restaurant Roof Plan Conditions (ongoing) PRIOR TO SITE WORK BEGINNING 1. Preconstruction meeting: Prior to beginning any site work, including clearing or grading, a preconstruction meeting shall be coordinated with,the Southold Town Planning Department and Southold Town Engineer. This meeting shall include the construction manager or equal, and the designated on-site environmental technician. r 2. Prior to Clearing: a. The 25-foot rear yard setback, and,the 10' side yard setback areas must be staked and'inspected by the Southold Town Planning Department as per condition number 9. below. b. Trees to be retained in other areas of the site must be flagged for inspection by Southold Town Planning Department as per condition number 8. below. STORMWATER RUN-OFF & DRAINAGE 3. Prior to construction, a SWPPP shall be prepared to address items during construction such as concrete washout areas, temporary stabilization, and erosion and sediment maintenance and inspection procedures. (SEQRA) 4. Storm water run-off containment systems must be inspected by the Southold Town Engineer at the time of installation. Prior to beginning any work on the drainage system for stormwater, please call the Southold Town Engineer to coordinate inspections. EVENTS 5. No outdoor events of any size are permitted. (ZBA Special Exception &SEQRA)" 6. No Special Events pursuant to Southold Town Code Chapter 205 are permitted. (ZBA Special Exception) Enclaves Hotel&Restaurant Page 8 of 13 January 9.2024 7. No,large events with over 100 guests are permitted. (ZBA Special Exception) TREE CLEARING 8. Retain existing trees wherever possible.These trees shall be flagged for inspection by the Southold Town Planning Department prior to clearing. (SEQRA) 9. Retain all existing trees within the 25-foot rear yard setback area and the 10-foot side yard setback area to contribute to boundary screening for adjacent properties and provide habitat benefits to wildlife associated with established native trees. (SEQRA) 10.Tree clearing shall occur during winter months(between December 1 and February 28) in accordance with NYSDEC to avoid any potential take of Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentionaiis), a species listed as federally endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (SEQRA) GRADING.&EXCAVATION 11.,Ail excess soil not used onsite shall be characterized for disposal purposes. Soil •wastes shall be transported to permitted off-site DEC disposal facilities in accordance with-NYSDEC Part 360. Other soils, if determined to have a beneficial use, shall be transported to other appropriate sites in accordance with NYSDEC Part 360. (SEQRA) 12.To prevent tracking of potentially impacted soil into areas where neither remediation nor other risk management measures are planned, the following precautions will be undertaken: (1) access to areas in which a clean soil cap has been constructed will be limited by temporary barricade fencing until landscaping activities have been completed; (2)vehicles and equipment will be cleanedor washed down prior to moving from impacted areas to areas in which soil mitigation is not necessary or has already been completed; and'(3)erosion controls (i.e. silt fencing) shall be installed to prevent runoff from impacted areas from entering areas in which soil mitigation is not necessary or has already been completed. (SEQRA) 13.Erosion and sedimentation controls shall be put in place prior to and during construction and will include,at minimum, stockpile protection, inlet sediment control devices for storm structure protection, silt fencing, and anti-tracking pads to prevent off- site sediment tracking from construction vehicles. All erosion and sediment control measures shall be routinely inspected and maintained such that no sediment will be transported off-site. (SEQRA) ,1 Endaves Hotel&Re tad urant Paae 9 of 13 January 9.2024 14.The on-site environmental technician shall monitor dust levels from equipment, vehicular traffic and construction activities on exposed soils and take immediate action when necessary. The environmental technician shall implement the dust control plan (as provided in Section 2.3 of the SMMP in Appendix L of the DEIS)if there is actual or potential visible dust. Dust suppression measures shall be employed in accordance with NYSDEC DER-10 Appendix 1 B for Fugitive Dust and,Particulate Monitoring. (SEQRA) 15.If there is dust or the potential for dust in areas of concern, the Environmental Technician shall direct that area to be wet down. Calcium chloride may be used if the problem cannot be controlled with water. Dust control measures may include the following methods and, as good practice, can also be implemented at times when dust monitoring is not being conducted to prevent the migration of non-impacted dust off- site, as well as potentially impacted dust(SEQRA): a. Apply water to designated work areas prior to any clearing, mixing, or other earth moving operations. b. At'a minimum, water shall be applied to all disturbed work areas at least four times per day during dry weather periods. c. The disturbed areas shall be sprayed down at the end of each day to form a thin crust.This is in addition to the required minimum of four times per day. d. No earth moving activities shall be performed if the wind at the site steadily exceeds 15 miles per hour. e. All unpaved haul roads and equipment paths shall be watered on a sufficient basis to prevent dust emissions. An alternative.to frequent watering may be to pour a-4- inch-thick layer of gravel. f. Transportation,of soils on-site shall be performed in a covered vehicle, or the soils must be sufficiently watered to prevent dust emissions. g. Onsite vehicle speeds must not exceed 10 miles per hour and the site must be posted with speed signs. h. Parking areas shall be designated and shall be sufficiently watered or gravel lined to prevent dust emissions. Enclaves Hotel&Restaurant Pane 10 of 13 January 9.2024 LANDSCAPING & BUFFERS 16.BUffers, A minimum 15'wide Transition Buffer shall be maintained along the eastern property line in accordance with§280-94(B)(1) and the site plan. This transition buffer shall include a staggered double row of at least 133 Leyland Cypress plantings at 18'-20' high and a 6.5' high noise-attenuating wooden stockade fence to provide privacy from noise, headlight glare and visual intrusion to residential dwellings. 17.Landscape buffer plantings shall be installed early in the construction process to provide additional time for growth during the construction period. (SEQRA) 18.Native and drought-tolerant species shall be installed as approved on the landscape plan to reduce use of fertilizer, pesticides and water for irrigation. (SEQRA) 19.Organic landscaping maintenance shall be implemented as approved. (SEQRA) GENERAL 20.Existing historic structure shall be retained. (SEQRA) 21.All aspects of the project shall be constructed and maintained substantially.in accordance with the approved site plan including the architectural drawings. 22.Proposed hotel amenities(spa, pools, roof top bar/lounge)shall not be available for use by general public. Use of the hotel spa and indoor and outdoor swimming pools shall be restricted to overnight hotel guests only. No day passes for use of the hotel amenities will be permitted. (ZBA Special Exception &SEQRA) 23.No outdoor music is permitted anywhere on the property. (ZBA Special Exception) 24.No expansion of the number of approved hotel units is permitted. (ZBA Special Exception) 25.Exterior signage details must be submitted for review and approval by the Southold Town Planning Board prior to permitting. r 26.The hotel building must have a sprinkler suppression system. Enclaves Hotel&Restaurant Page 11 of 13 January 9.2024 27.Curbs shall be mountable, particularly in areas of the driveways where an extended load-bearing surface is provided to accommodate larger emergency response vehicles, as shown on the site plan. 28.The existing well shall be utilized as an irrigation well for all irrigation needs in addition to the use of smart irrigation control systems and drought tolerant vegetation. 29.Groundwater-monitoring wells shall be installed to monitor groundwater impacts both upstream and downstream of the effluent disposal system of the onsite STP. This is in accordance with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services(SCDHS), Suffolk County Water Authority(SCWA)and NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). 30.No parking to be allowed on State Route 25 in front of the subject property. (SEQRA) 31.A noise-attenuating wooden stockade fence at 6.5' in height shall be installed along the eastern and western property lines as shown on the site plan (approved by the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals as part of their Special Exception approval and SEQRA findings). (SEQRA) 11 32.Acoustic Barriers shall be installed around the cottage exterior spaces. (SEQRA) 33.To address potential noise concerns from the rooftop lounge area, a 30-inch glass barriershall be provided on top of the parapet. (SEQRA) 34.The rooftop terrace shall have limited hours of operation (10AM-9PM Sun-Thurs, 11AM-10PM Fri-Sat) and will be for overnight hotel guests only. (SEQRA) RENOVATION OF EXISTING HOUSE TO A RESTAURANT 35.Prior to renovation and conversion of the existing house, an Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) survey shall be performed. If ACM are identified, removal of any materials shall be in accordance with prevailing regulations. (SEQRA) 36.The existing onsite sanitary system, which currently services the single-family residence, shall be abandoned,,in place in accordance with SCDHS regulations. The structures shall be pumped and cleaned prior to abandonment. (SEQRA) 37.The existing 275-gallon above ground fuel oil tanks noted in the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment(ESA) shall be cleaned and removed in accordance with applicable r Enclaves Hotel&Restaurant Page 12-of 13 January 9.2024 regulations. These tanks were noted in the Phase I ESA as being empty and currently out of service as the residence is currently heated with natural gas. (SEQRA) *ORIGIN of CONDITIONS LISTED ABOVE Special Exception: r Conditions that originate from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals' (ZBA) Special Exception approval granted December 2, 2021 (File No. 7046SE) have the notation "ZBA Special Exception"to identify them: SEQRA: Conditions that originate from the SEQRA Environmental Impact Statement and Findings Statement of the ZBA, with same being adopted by the. Southold Town Planning Board on September 12, 2022 have the notation "SEQRA" to identify them. Please also note the following requirements in the Southold Town Code relating to Site plans: 1. Approved Site Plans are valid for eighteen months from the date of approval,within which time all proposed work must be completed, unless the Southold Town Planning Board grants an extension. 2. Any changes from the Approved Site plan shall require Southold Town Planning Board approval. 3. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Southold Town Planning Board must inspect the site to ensure it is in conformity with the Approved Site Plan, and issue a final site inspection approval letter. Should the site be found not in conformance with the Approved Site Plan, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued unless the Southold Town Planning Board approves the changes to the plan If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Respectfully, H. /tA �.. James H. Rich III Chairman Encl. enclaves Hotel&Restpuyar nt Qaae 13 at 13 Januacv 9.ZQ24 cc: Andrew V. Giambertone Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector Michael Collins,Town Engineer By signing this letter,the applicant acknowledges that there are Town Code requirements and conditions, including those listed above, that must be satisfied prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Print name: �' vka.4/Appllcant ,. Signature: Date: l I EXHIBIT 4 JAMB li'T(INk.� Project: The Enclaves— 56655 Route 25 Southold NY SCTM#: 1000-63-03-15 Ref.: Permitting Time Frame Date: 10-16-2024 ■ 2023/12/13 - Suffolk County Health Department Approval. ■ 2024/01/09—Planning Board Approval/Resolution. ■ 2024/01/16 - Building Permit Submission. ■ Building Permit comment responses submissions. o 2024/03/27 o 2024/04/26 o 2024/05/02 o 2'024/05/31 ■ 2024/05/31 -Final Building Permit Submission. ■ 2024/06/20 - Building Permit Received. 62 Elm St. Huntington,NY 11743 Tel: (631)367-0050 o Fax(631)367-6636 _....... ..._......_..,. _...._......._.._..__.....__._._.....__.............__.,......_...__................._._.._...............P a g.e_- 1 ._........ "771110111'11 1 po ! ! Utilities General ALLOWABLE SANITARY DENSITY FLOW " -.44-78331 AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE EXCAVATING. 1, THE LOCATIONS,SIZES,AND TYPES OF EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN AS AN APPROXIMATE 1. CON RACTOR SHA LL NOTIFY°D.G SAFE (18$8 3 "swVA Y OWNER HAVE NOTINDEPENDENTLYVERIFIED <! ` `` r x�rl;� `• " €''; . r? _ r' REPRESENTATION ONLY. 0 REPRESENTATIVE(S) ki d'. ,�,d>'�'-•,.r .' -r A� .,,.";• 1, 6.75 ACRES X 600 GPD/ACRE=4,050 GPD tip k r-'� R SITE SECUP,I Y AND JOB SAFETY.CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THIS INFORMATION AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN DOES NOT GUARANTEE !� ����~ 2, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FO S THE ACTUAL EXISTENCE,SERVICEABILITY,OR OTHER DATA CONCERNING THE UTILITIES,NOR DOES IT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH OSHA STANDARDS AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. THAT ADDITIONAL UTILITIES MAY BE PRESENT THNTARE NOT SHOWN PROPOSED SANITARY DENSITY FLOWGUARANTEE AGAINST THE POSSIBILITY ;tl, �' • ,�'�` =' '° `" ` `° °" '« `®,`« N ON THE PLANS. PRIOR TO ORDERING P9ATERIALS AND BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL $• . « F..+r r ,. ;." r I; 4" r SIDEWALKS,AND WALKWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED 1 "� ACCESSIBLE ROUTES,PARKING SPACES,RAMPS,S DE - v '`•*, r r R '"ffi`.'rt• "T s Y S'';I`(� �. �,�;�;s ��e> ` �"� m 3, _ WITH VERIFY AND DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATIONS,SIZES,AND ELEVATIONS OF THE POINTS OF CONNECTIONS "'* °"{ * 'l 4 RfCAN5 Y LTH DISABILITIES.ACT AND Y�I:H STATE AND LOCAL LAWS 74 SEATS RESTAURANT X 10 GPDISEAT -740 GPD ~'" .'• . � F.: � �' « � .®,� A• CONFORMANCE WITH THE FEDERAL AMERICANS '=,, :.. s TO EXISITING UTI'-ITIES AND SHALL CONFIRM THAT THERE ARE NO INTERFERENCES WITH EXISTING UTILITIES ,«•,_ " + r . • •° r g,• •(;,:'r a' �" * 0 i j' rr " , '';�. !t « .� � � �" � ,,•,. - , r; Strategic Environmental and Engineering Solutions AND REGULATIONS('WHICH ARE MOST STRINGENT.). 44 UNITS HOTEL X 150 GPDIUNIT =6,600 GPD ✓' ," ;, AND THE PROPOSED UTILITY ROUTES,INCLUDING ROUTES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY. <• . =,, Jt *,::.• fE r 25Q SEATS EVENT SPACE X 5 GPDISEAT =1,250 GPD `� '"'• ' r, �f `4:., ,. 9 w fir' l: } ,, tI r.ee..«\,••-,.';,.,..,.•". `t ..F;:��✓,:r't',.. `+,.,;.,,,,,,� 3e' -q'i. --'� -,.. LJ' -RESTORED IPEPERVIOUs SURFACES(BUILDINGS, A DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND NOT RES = "' % `'. „ • `: ° " 4. ARES T WITH THE PROPOSED WORK,OR EXISTING CONDITIONS TOTAL SANITARY FLOW 8,590 GPD �., ::",, r" « ®am,: ®- `. ', " f �, c INCHES LOAM AND SEED. 2. WHERE AN EXISTING UTILITY IS FOUND O CONFLICT � � PAVEMENTS,WALKS,ETC,}SHALL RELIEVE 61 C DIFFER FROM THOSE SHOWN SUCH THAT THE WORK CANNOT BE COMPLETED AS INTENDED,THE LOCATION, �� .�` t;. ®,• ,:' r•. f s 1?` '"'' " { HALL BE ACCURATELY DETERMINED WITHOUT DELAY BY THE s' " • « �` �+ ` ` it .' , .. 5- WORK WITHIN THE LOCAL RIGHTS OF-WAY SHALL COHEIR NA TO LOCAL MUNICIPAL STANDARDS" WORK ELEVATION,AND SIZE OF THE UTILITY5 SINCE PROPOSED EXCEEDS ALLOWABLE A SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT(STP} , °",;.,./ � �;y.:w c S, ;` ,..w� �^, • .� f ;;-n., �t ..,...„v..Www„_,...�,�...:,,......,......,-.,:a�.,��.., ' ' M TO COUh.)TY STANDARDS.'NORK WITHIN STATE CONTRACTOR,AND THE INFORMATION FURNISHED IPJ WRITING TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PROVIDED. WITHIN THE COJNTY RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHALL COHEIR HAS BEEN ISO t M„w ,..�, • r ONTRACTOR*$FAILURE TO NOTIFY PRIOR TO PERFORMING � „ F THE CONFLICT AND C ., ` `:-® Y 'j 4 « Suite 7 RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE STATE HIGHddAY DEPARTMENTS RESOLUTION0 �'"-r� t'. _'-�f _ .�� 530 Johnson Avenue. P F ATIONS FOR HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES. ADDITIONAL WORK RELEASES OWNER FROM OBLIGATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS WHICH OTHERWISE 6 �''• '' STANDARD 5 EG IG , ,., I� _., M ,a * ° +a - 1 • "" a � ,- ®.' Bohemia . NY . 11715-26'18 PROPOSED RESTAURANT-GREASE TRAP SIZING : . ",r "`. > ®>:.:R�.�_: a�� g�,; _, MAY BE WARRANTED TO RESOLVE THE CONFLICT- r� * ✓; ,'t, _..:-_,;._ 6. UPON AWARD OF CONTRACT,CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY CONSTRUGTIG4 NOTIFICATIONS AND « . p'"� 1 ' Phone: (631} 589-6353. FOX: (631}589-8705 T BONDS ASSOCIATED THE WORK 3. SET CATCH BASIN REh1S,AND INVERTS OF SEWERS,DRAINS,AND DITCHES IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROPOSED 74 SEATS RESTAURANT � Y ti✓�y r"; Q �♦ ITS PAY FEES AND SSA µ '`� .- RTC® FOR OBTAIN NECESSARY PERM 4, �,:" j" '�" "' -i;, « APPLY 0x`t JY•,,` w r ✓,;" A ' ®« "IT1C'111 INFO@F'ViIGROSSE INDICATED ON THE DRAW INGS,IN THE SPECIFICATIONS,AND IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, DO NOT ELEVATIONS ON THE GRADING AND UTILITY PLANS. AND FIRE HYDRANTS.WITH APPROPRIATE PERCAETS. _ Cs ': rt •`- 1 * CLOSE OR OBSTRUCT ROAD�IAY5,SIDEWALKS,A `31<, " "` < ®r . "°w_ •^~ ' 4. RIM ELEVATIONS FOR DRAIN AND SEWER MANHOLES,WATER VALVE COVERS,GAS GATES,ELECTRIC AND KITCHEN FLOW-20 GPD,SEAT X 74 SEATS=1,480 GPD .:= o. ,,; ,. • ';, F� ' ._ "gip'' = r , TELEPHONE PULL BOXES,AND MANHOLES,AND OTHER SUCH ITEMS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE ' j* �y "w° w ' "" a CONSULTANTS T TRAFFIC SIGNAGE AND PAVShIENT MARKINGS SHALL CONFORM TO THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC -��' « +' � _.; 5, _, ` • i. �, . .mow SET/RESET As FOLLOWS: PROPOSED 250 SEATS EVENT SPACE ` °; y " 1' � w • °' CONTROL DEVICES. ,' s 8. AREAS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF PROPOSED WORK DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL A. PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SURFACES: FLUSH ° ~M : _. KITCHEN FLOW=2.5 GPDISEAT X 250 SEATS=625 GPD ''�"�� °'`""" ��-- � • � � ' ; "'».� ` ' BE RESTORED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO THEIR OR'GENAL GdNJOtTtON AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. ` X r, ® « .� y B. ALL SURFACES ALONG ACCESSIBLE ROUTES: FLUSH & est \• _ :ms, sF;;'. 9. IN THE EVENT THAT THE SUSPECTED CONTAMINATED SOIL,GROUNDVYATER,AND OTHER MEDIAARE TOTAL KITCHEN FLOW:1,480 GPD+625 GPD=2,105 GPD .N r' :.; "" ,' •« ,' ENCOUNTERED DURING EXCAVATION AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES BASED ON VISUAL,OLFACTORY,OR C. LANDSCAPE,LOAM AND SEED,AND OTHER EARTH SURFACE AREAS:ONE INCH ABOVE SURROUNDING 1f (' «� •«1° '� fis• ♦ „oma �'a ` ,� r" s li • s,;- �'`L r.,*,.,.=q , OTHER EVIDENCE,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STOP WORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE SUSPECT MATERIAL TO AREA AND TAPER EARTH TO RIP.)ELEVATION. _ ;`• �' r « �, x GREASE TRAP DESIGN AVOID FURTHER SPREADING OF THE MATERIAL,AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER IMMEDIATELY SO THAT THE s„r • _ 3•.r r� . •o ` APPROPRIATE TESTING AND SUBSEQUENT ACTION CAN BE TAKEN. 5. THE LOCATION,SIZE,DEPTH,AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED PRIVATE UTILITY - r" �" SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS PROVIDED BY,AND APPROVED BY,THE REQUIRED- 2,105 GPD X 1 DAY=2,105 GPD c I ARM ETC.). FINAL DESIGN LOADS AND •,' � 10. GON7RAGTOR SHA'_L PREVENT DUST,SEDIMENT,AND DEBRIS FROM EXITING THE 517E AND SHALL BE RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY(GAS,TELEPHONE,ELECTRIC,FIRE AL PROVIDED: 1 10`DIA.x 5 AE TRAP 2LIQUID DEPTH GREASE GALS RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANUP,REPAIRS,AND CORRECTIVE ACTION IF SUCH OCCURS. LOCATIONS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE DINNER AND ARCHITECT. ( y , ( ) a SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO 6. CDN7RACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING FEES FOR POLE 1�. DAMAGE RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION'LOADS S L f s' r .•, RELOCATION AND FOR THE ALTERATION AND ADJUSTMENT OF GAS,ELECTRIC,TELEPHONE,FERE ALARM, STP DESIGN FLOW �'r• ✓' ° sill ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. x_. et✓f rr' f r *� AND ANY OTHER PRIVATE UTILITIES,WHETHER WORK IS PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR OR BY THE UTILITIES '"� e s �''."'� d ''i. c ✓ l :;j . `: .� c ' F LIKING CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT ADVERSE COMPANY. Jr° �^ � �'• � � �� � `� � � �d � � *�< 12, CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTROL STORMthATER RUNOFF D PROPOSED RESTAURANT DESIGN FLOW ✓: N,, ,, ,a «s IMPACTS TO OFF-SITE AREAS,AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REPAIR RESUL"ENG DAMAGES,IF ANY,AT NO '' �' ':• " lJ4 t. COST TO OWNER. 7. UTILITY PEPS MATERIALS SHALL BE AS FOLLO'W5,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLAN: _ '� 74 SEATS X 30 GPDISEAT. 2,220 GPD •�';ts3 p :,, r. `"'," >® �'```; ti#; L`. < ``;<;dY,®` l t r A. WATER PIPES SHALL BE CEMENT LINE DUCTILE IRON PIPE(CLOT) 14 -'�� �'�"., ` 'It; "� , ,,.� �. ���'� .•�� �*� �� t' B. SANITARY SEWER PIPES SHALL BE POLYVINYLCWLOR'DE(PVC) PROPOSED 44 UNIT HOTEL "" I J P s fj f \ � �i`•,•yt"'r � 115 C. STORM DRAINAGE PIPES SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE(RCP} 150 GPD/UNIT X 44 UNITS=6,600 GPD (I,: _ `Neb � fl t r� f, � ,r„,,� .r. �'"'_^'....,,,-`s�•,,,,",. �f s�� �":.:.;,,�t Ei�,��!t� lawM.,.,a-.w..,.;.,...,,,.-..,,ec.w.n.�:.,�,..a..,....-a......,,,...,....,a,..w......,>�.....a...."....w.<w,w.ue.M.w..d:.+a,w:..w:w..oa,.......-�.e..« - .,,.,, ... '': 8. CONT RACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR AND SHALL FURNISH EXCAVATION, PROPOSED EVENT SPACE DESIGN FLOW 5 Grading and Drainage Motes INSTALLATION,AND BACKFILL OF ELECTRICAL FURNISHED SITEVt'ORK RELATED ITEMS SUCH AS PULL BOXES, raf I j ;� 1 7 �T. *, p CONDUITS,DUCT BANKS,LIGHT POLE BASES,AND CONCRETE PADS. SITE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OF DUCT BANKS IF REQUIRED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY AND AS INDICATED ON 250 SEATS X 7.5 GPDISEAT=1,875 GPD 'r' ``; ' ': ``', ` =- w w ~' �� ` x # a77 ` . 4. ALL MATERIALS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS AND f f i* L f .P THEDRAvVEPIGS. ((I Sou�t;otd `,1 � ` 4 I-(aTp "5 SPECIFICATIONS OF THE TOWN OF SQU7HGL0,SUFFOLK COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT,SUFFO11 LK COUNTY REQUIRED STP DESIGN FLOW:2.220 GPD+6,600 GPD+1,875 GPD=10,695 GPD '` I� '. zf �ic':c " _ q Pt .3 �� DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.AS -s' - > APPLICABALE. 9. CONTRACTOR SHA'_L EXCAVATE AND BACKFILL TRENCHES FOR GAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH GAS COMPANY'S REQUIREMENTS. LEACHING POOL DESIGN 2. UTLITY INFORMATIONSHOWN ON THIS PLAN IS BASED ON VISIBLE FIELD EVIDENCE AND AVAILABLE R _ `;, ,•- ry - _ 10. ALL DRAINAGE AND SANITARY STRUCTURE INTERIOR DIAMETERS W MIN,)SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE I` 1"C' yP '`J� RECORDS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING MANUFACTURER BASED ON THE PIPE CONFIGURA T IONS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS AND LOCAL MUNICIPAL _ I' `m:W:„. `F D-' '' ', r' -�' WORK, CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN NOT TO DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS(OR REQUIRED: 10,695 GPD 15 GPDISF-2139 SF $` � � � ` `"µ' ` � STANDARDS. FOR MANHOLES THAT ARE 20 FEET IN DEPTH AND GREATER,THE MINIMUM DIAMETER 5HALL BE �"°' I, ` � � " 3� k d� U AT PORTIONS THEREOF)TO REMAIN. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF ABANDONED \' t � �" '€ � fi f I€ L 5 FEET. ♦�x.•;.:.;;._.r" ,�,.:=='.�;:�'°:?rs+1? '""w�.M-`-'"^'`-.�"°' »;.;:� -;� ''` t, 1: UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND INSTALLATION OF NEW SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND SHALL PROVIDED: NEW LEACHING POOLS • „!,!I %'I E}ow H I 0,COORDINATE WORK WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. (VLF) 10`DI.4.LEACHING POOL HAS 31.4 SF PER VERTICAL LINEAR FEET w.. . . .•.,.,.. .. .., .r :. IV, 2,139 SF 131,4 SFILF =68.12 LF I" 3, REMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURES,INCLUDING BUILDINGS,DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND OTHER STRUCTURES, t111y niorm�tiori ' I " TH LD AND APPLICABLE _ ....... ".....".,_._ ..,........ _ FIVE(5)OF 10'DIA.BY 15'EFF.DEPTH LEACHING POOLS ;' j-- - " �'' ';3;" < €,€ '' t.;F w' s ': •" ES TO BE DONE 1N CON-ORhAANGE WITH THE REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN OF SOU O CONTRACTOR _,.__.._.w..,._._...__......_. ' •f I� zE It COUNTY,STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES THE CONT 75 VLF PROVIDED, ✓ • _ : SERVICE OPERATING AUTHORITY '" '_" « ` « F"' A EXISTING STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS. I • I '` FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL OF E _ 25 „ � ry t ®�: .,..# Iso �� :M' �� j«_�r., r r w,• •yr • j"�• f 'F�-- •a'` ^•°, � � DRAINAGE STRUCTURES,ETC. •�. ��'r �� -. � ' 4. ALL STRUCTURES TO B�REMOVED{FOUNDATIONS,CONCTRETE SLABS, } 'Ea° {-_ "~ ' - ` «'«"r „ °I)``• ( ' ( ;E`®° ;R "'W p° WITH CLEAN,GRANULAR}ARTERIAL,COMPACTED TO 95%STANDARD PROCTOR ELECTRIC PSE 8 G SHALL BE REPLACED r',�� a"` •.?" _ "`j �' C"✓ / . ' . ® • <jfF«r "II ° •fy r,✓' '?t * * !,{ ., i€ �"` >'�.. .1 €:"� Y'�®" !<r°.,® 7 <ie :f.,.8„ r<.q`g r 3'*a a � DENSITY, WATER SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY e ,•h • «v.. a-.. € , ,t: + r a r o • • • «air a o 4i 'L - . n I 5'm '° i Po;'s, s, ' TELEPHONE VERIZON � u0 5. ALL PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED OR REPLACED SHALL BE SAWCUT. h `°r `d a`• la'' + •`r� ` `• • a II =•, {� a'-" 4, �`� '!_.._..... . « � • �4^' teos,2, i= " t� "Ill #s' i j.` , €,;di,'a «I€�i{",>,••``-';�,:. I: +'\, s�r,Exe'�t°'°! SANITARY SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY APPROPRIATE MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC MEASURES GAS NATIONAL GRID DURING CONSTRUCTION AS APPLICABLE. MEASURES UTILIZED DURING WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE N,Y,S.MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICESr ''I� �; ' :� _ •i i . ` SITE LOCATION MAP Pro Vc-4SCALD; NTS " ERE NEW CONCRETE CURBING AND CURBED ISLANDS ARE ! ! I 7. EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED,WH PROPOSED,THE BOTTOM OF CURB ELEVATION SHALL BE CALCULATED USING THE EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATION. THE TOP OF CURB SHALL BE CALCULATED 6"ABOVE THE EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATION, PAVEMENT AROUND THE PERIMETER OF EACH ISLAND SHALL BE GRADED SO THAT WATER IS NOT TRAPPED AGAINST OR NEAR THE CURB,AND WILL FLOW FREELY T OWARDS THE NEAREST EXISTING OR PROPOSED + THE ENCLAVES 6 1 h1 INLET. EXISTING PAVEMENT SHALL BE SAWCUT AT THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED CURB- SITE 7 DOWNSTREA _ 5 BACKFILL AROUND THE THE COMPLETED ISLAND SHALL BE CLEAN,GRANULAR FILL COMPACTED TO 95% w - y� - - ° u - """'` " ` -'° 56655 ROUTE 25 STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. NEW ASPHALT SHALL PROVIDED A SL400TH TRANSITION TO EXISTING Erosion Control SOUTHOLD,NY 4 REVISED PER CLIENT S REQUEST 0211812021 PAVEMENT TO REMAIN ALL SAWOUT LINES SHALL BE SEALED WHERE NEW PAVEMETN MEETS EXISTING _: FAVEMEN7T0 REMAIN. SCTh4#: 1000-63-3-15 ADDRESSED COMMENTS DATED 1249(19 04!081202 1. PRIOR TO STARTING ANY OTHER WORK ON THE SITE,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY APPROPRIATE 1 ADDRESSED O S COMMENTS 07!1712019 8. ALL EXISTING CATCH BASINS AND DRYWELLS SHALL BE CLEANED OF SILT AND DEBRIS AT THE COMPLETION AGENCIES AND SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND AS IDENTIFIED LOT AREA: 6.75 ACRES 1 REV.TO 44 ROOMS-UPDATE UTILITIES D4l11l2017 OF CONSTRUCTION, IN FEDERAL,STA;E,AND LOCAL APPROVAL DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THIS PROJECT. �*�wa�`�•1��7r�� ri�} ,1 p�,�t� ��*•�-r �-v �,•t�+ �+ NumF.s:r ttnt�,��r uE�:.r'r'�r, r;n�o.�t n r3,,',> L.�1�11':,: ��1)- �r117i�.rd:e1 BUSINESS Cesu nori By Date S,rbm<trs; 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY APPROPRIATE UTILITIES 48 FOURS BEFORE EXCAVATION,CUTTING, 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES,AND REMOVE SEDIMENT _ __. ...__..__ ...__ __.____. .__. _ _ _�u_ REMOVING,OR TAPPING INTO ANY EXISTING UTILITY SERVICE. THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SHALL BE NOTIFIED THEREFROM ON A'WEEKLY BASIS AND WITHIN TWELVE HOURS AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND DISPOSE OF - �m�� � '-_ _.__._.- -REQUIRED PROPOSED PROPOSED WI FUTURE EVENT SPACE 'CTC {11%ZO(l7 Drawn By Uxo,crt:=d 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY SITE WORK IS BEGUN, SEDIMENTS IN AN UPLAND AREA SUCH THAT THEY DO NOT ENCUMBER OTHER DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND TC/LT 08/2.3(16 PROTECTED AREAS. MIN,LOT SIZE 20,000 SQ.FT. 294,202 SO.FT. 294.202 SQ.FT c�enr approve i By 10, PRIVATE UTILITY POLES TO BE RELOCATED SHALL BE DONE WITH COORDINATION WITH THE APPROPRIATE PAIN,LOT WIDTH 60` 190.66' 190,66' $E s�a ELECTRIC AND TELECOMMUNICATION COM,PANIES. GAS AND ELECTRIC SERVICE CONNECTIONS ANDIOR 3. CONTRACTOR SHLL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE TO CONTROL CONSTRUCTION SUCH THAT SEDIMENTATION MIN.LOT DEPTH 100' 928 03' 928.03' y AS SHCt11T SERVICE ABANDONMEN'S SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH LIPA I NATIONAL GRID.WHERE FEASIBLE, SHALL NOT AFFECT REGULATORY PROTECTED AREAS,WHETHER SUCH SEDIMENTATION IS CAUSED BY MIN.FRONT YARD 15' 17.16' 17.16' PROPOSED ELECTRICAL WIRING SHALL BE UNDERGROUND. WATER,VFIND,OR DIRECT DEPOSIT. MIN.SIDE YARD 10' 32.0' 32.0° THE ENCLAVES MIN.BOTH SIDE YARDS 25' 80.66' 60,66` 56655 ROUTE 25 11. ALL CONNECTING DRAINAGE PIPING SHALL BE 12"RCP UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM CONSTRICTION SEQUENCING SUCH THAT EARTH MATERIALS ARE EXPOSED MLN,REAR YARD 25' 153.83' 153.83' FOR A MINIMUM OF TIME BEFORE THEY ARE COVERED,SEEDED,OR OTHERWISE STABILIZED TO PREVENT MIN.LANDSCAPE AREA 25% 58,62% 56.3% SOUTHOLD, NY 12. DEBRIS SHALL NOT BE BURIED ON THE SUBJECT SITE, ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIAL AND DEBRIS SHALL BE EROSION, MAX,LOT COVERAGE 40% 16.39`0 18.6% DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL TOWN,COUNTY,STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS AND APPLICABLE MAXIMUM HEIGHT 35' 32.93' 32.93' a oft CODES. 5. UPON!COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMANENT GROUND COVER, MAX.NUMBER OF STORIES 2 STORIES 2 STORIES 2 STORIES 4 CONTRACTOR SHALL REP40VE AND DISPOSE OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND CLEAN SEDIMENT AND 13. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPING SHALL BE DR-18 PVC OR EQUAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLAN, DEBRIS FROM ENTIRE DRAINAGE AND SEWER SYSTEMS. WHERE SEWER PIPE COVER I5 LESS THAN 4'-0",DUCTILE IRON PIPE IS REQUIRED. SITE PLAN i 14. REFER TO LIPA STANDARD SHEETS FOR PROTECTIVE BOLLARD SIZES,REQUIRED SETBACKS AND OTHER DIMENSIONS AT TRANSFORMER AND GENERATOR PADS. 15- WATER MAIN TAPS,INCLUDING TAPPING PERMITS AND FEES,METER REQUIREMENTS,ETC.,SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY. 56655 ROUTE 25 16. EXISTING WATER:SEWER OHIO OTHER CASTINGS DISTURBED DURING WORK SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO GRADE ! w J 4 SOUTHfJLO AS REQUIRED. WELLS SHALL BE PRECAST,WITH PRECAST OPENINGS FOR DRAINAGE PIPE AND SHALL nrVey Notes SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK 17, ALL PROPOSED DRY County Ia,Map t,uniaer. COrsdaet F7:,m�r CONFORM TO SUFFOLK COUNTY STANDARDS. _ _... _ _. _. _-_______..� ___. �w�_..�_ __.__.__. __.___._,.__, 1000-63-3.15 1. SURVEY PREPARED BY JOHN MINTO SURVEYOR,93 SMITHT0'WN BOULEVARD,SMITHTOWN,NY Reg�:3tay RePere`fi'e r,urtxCt. - DATED:MARCH 28,2006-LAST UPDATED:JULY 6,2015 SITE PLAN GENER.A►L. NOTES VS to to A c4 F 1141 A L 1 Utav„rj N;,^t er. a REVIEWED Y ZBA C. Moo 1 6' 1 oZ a� ► Sheat16 of � N ii �1 Ura'a!haize9 8!ferxPan O�iitbn /I��//'�160 �C �( � t 00 )k to ttns r#m' ng and feln!M Js,m,ents t'i Y G i 6 0 1. ,a vidAon 01 S3XW 7299 0 of the New York S!a+e Fduma on U rm � i tY :G .:iwd� J.. t 1 r777 _7777 n 1 1 WT JIL 7A 1 1` 1 1 1 1 r. W L 7 77 Existing Proposed Notes Existing Proposed Notes Existing Proposed Notes Existing Proposedd Notesu�~ _ G Political and Property Boundaries Topographic Features Utility Features PROPERTY LINE;RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE -- 1 w 14 MINOR CONTOURS RD 6 RD ROOF DRAINAGE BC BC BOTTOM OF CURB W..y -- 1� INTERIOR PROPERTY LINE - - ;%r1 - 20 MAJOR CONTOURS _. .p_� 15"D .. ......... .. DRAINAGE B',PJ BW BOTTOM Of WALL -------- -------- BUILDING SETBACK LINE - - -D-G E-L I N-E - - RIDGELINE UD UD UNDERDRAINAGE Strategic Environmental and Engineering Solutions R I CATV CAN CABLE TELEVISION TOP - ---- - -- EASEMENT OF SLOPE TOP OF SLOPE FD FD FRENCH DRAINAGE CB CB CATCH BASIN WETLAND FLAGGING BOTTOM OF SLOPE BOTTOM OF SLOPE 6"S 6"S SANITARY SEWERAGE CO CO CLEANOUT F. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONIDISTURBANCE FM FM FORCE MAIN . �' w " • EL.123.45 + EL.123.45 EL.123.45 + EL.123.45 ® e ® • — - - - - — D MATCHLINE SPOT ELEVATION W 12"W WATER MAIN D DRAINAGE DMH DMH DRAINAGE MANHOLE TC 123.45 TC 123.45 630 Johnson Avenue. . Suite 7 BC 1122.95 BC 122.95 TOP and BOTTOM of CURB ELEVATION -----2"DW--------- 2"DW DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE Curb and Pavement ` 5 DW DW DRYWELL Bohemia . NY. 11716-2618 6"FP 6"FP FIRE PROTECTION SERVICE Phone: (631) 589-6353 . Fax: (631) 589-8705 CONCRETE CURB TO BE REMOVED BW 113.45 G G NATURAL GAS TVt!123.45 TW 123.45 TOP and BOTTOM of WALL ELEVATION EBX EBX ELECTRIC BOX E-mail: INFO PWGROSSER.COM BW 113.45_ , CONCRETE CURB - OE -- OE OVERHEAD WIRE EMH EMH ELECTRIC MANHOLE CONSULTANTS PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED Drainage Elements ----- E --- E ELECTRIC POWERLINE EX EX EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXDW A-1 DW A-1 T T TELECOMMUNICATION FA FA FIRE ALARM DRAINAGE STRUCTURE LABEL RIV 135.43 RIM 135.43.43 FOC FOC FIBER OPTIC CABLE FD FD FRENCH DRAIN -------- SAWCUT LINE INV 130.43(N) INV 130.43(N) NEW PAVEMENT LLWiLLLIU111 LL11ILLLP III TRENCH DRAIN CATV-- -CATV CABLE TELEVISION FM FM FORCE MAIN FA _._ ___ FA FIRE ALARM FOC FOC FIBER OPITIC CABLE fes' Q O DRAINAGE MANHOLE wtlh GRATE INLET TRF TRF TRAFFIC WIRING FP FP FIRE PROTECTION SERVICE HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT l NFIRE HYDRANT G G GAS Building and Elements DMH ® O DRAINAGE MANHOLE wb SOLID COVER WV DQ WATER VALVE WV GV GV GAS VALVE GV HYD HYD HYDRANT BUILDING TO BE REMOVED (�]' ' 1 ® �] ® CATCH BASIN with CURB INLET GV D4 GAS VALVE ICV ICV IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE C FMH QMH ELECTRIC MANHOLE INV INV INVERT BUILDING ` DRYWELL with GRATE INLETC' -O- UTILITY POLE LA LA LANDSCAPE r - - - - - - , �,_._�' 1�J/ �LP LIGHT POLE LP LP LIGHT POLE CONCRETE TO BE REMOVED ORD ROOF DRAIN MON MON MONUMENT 1 ® ® DRYWELL with SOLID COVER OH'N OHW CONCRETE and CONCRETE WALK ` P O P O POST OVERHEAD WIRE RD RD ROOF DRAIN SIGN QENT .41 OHD BUILDING ENTRANCE and OVERHEAD DOOR /'' `, RIM RIM RIM ELEVATION 00DRYWELL with BURIED CONCRETE COVER IPF @ IPF IRON PIPE / S S SANITARY I SEWER MON ® MON CONCRETE MONUMENT SMH SMH O BOLLARD PROTECTION SANITARY/SEWER MANHOLE -- Cl2F CIRF - �% <' OO CAPPED IRON ROD SPRINKLER HEAD SPK SPK Fence and Property Features I,) j t-i 1 DRYWELL with CURB INLET P \ �! \ , r 11RFIRF IRON ROD T TELEPHONE O TC TC TOP OF CURB - x -- CHAIN LINK FENCE CIRS OCIRS CAPPED IRON ROD SET TMHTMH TELEPHONE MANHOLE [ ----n STOCKADEFENCE zc� FENCE(OTHER) SOIL BORING TRANS TRANS TRANSFORMER - Sanitary Sewer Facilities n...... ........ RETAINING WALL 0TSB TSB TMH t Q TMH TELEPHONE MANHOLE TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX - --- --- TREE LINE EXLP A-1 LP A-1 TSP TSP RIM 1135.43 RIM 135.43 SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE LABEL TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE - -' - - EDGE of WATER LINE I HIGH WATER INV 130.43(h) INV 13 [_-� TP ❑ TP TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TW TW TOP OF WALL XXX CQ Co u TRANS TRANS TRANSFORMER UD UD UNDER DRAINAGE (.."...) L�C 0 • CLEAN OUT C')TCP O TSP TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE W W WATER n TS61:1 TSB TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX 4b� WV WATER VALVE ® O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE S P ����J`.../ EBX O EBX ELECTRIC BOX VIF VERIFY IN FIELD 0 ,liLE( I _. 7 O ICV O ICV IRRIGATION CCNTROL VALVE 6 rr� LEACHING POOL w COVER TO GRADE 5 0 SPK 0 SPK SPRINKER HEAD 4 3 ADDRESSED COMMENTS DATED 12/9/19 04/08/2020 2 1 ADDRESSED DEIS COMMENTS 07/17/2019 1 IREV.TO 44 ROOMS-UPDATE UTILITIES 04/11/2017 4Z . Number Revision Description Revision Date SEPTIC TANK with COVERS TO GRADE Designed By Dale Submllfed TC 01/20/17 Drawn By Date Created TC/LT 08/23/16 Approved By Scale GREASE TRAP with COVERS TO GRADE BG AS SHOWN Client: j THE ENCLAVES LEACHING POOL with BURIED CONC.COVER 56655 ROUTE 25 / / SOUTHOLD, NY Project: EDSEPTIC TANK with BURIED CONC.COVER �-� SITE PLAN Project Address: 56655 ROUTE 25 SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK County Tax Map Number. Contract Number: 1000-63-3-15 Regulatory Reference Number: Title of Drawing: SITE PLAN s 3 0 LEGEND 0 , m YL s Drawing Number. c 0 FINAL MAP U 0 FVfjr per ­`vZ v BAMOO W �' rn x v,.. B 0Q]�� � E Sheet of 2 16 PWGC Project Number: w ri Unauthorized alteration or addition z` to this drawing and related documents "131601 Is a violation of Section 7209 o of the New York State Education Law cD o J a a W LL Q CV II 0 a M - - TOWN HARBOR w Cn C" - - - - LANE o _ = moo oc> > � W_ o 0 o LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF Il­ LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF � N Z VALERIE M.SCOPAZ PROPOSED PERVIOUS -� ANTHONY FORGIONE LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF REMOVE 65 Z N S.C.T.M. N0. 1000-63-03-16 (GRASSRESTAURANTVERS)PARKING IGHSTOROPOSESTOCKADE _ S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-17.3 PROPOSED6.5'HIGH FENCE G Z O (Un WITH NETTING 1 STOCKADE FENCE DRIVEWAY TO BE (GRASS PAVERS) FENCETOCKADE Strategic Environmental and Engineering Solute VINCENT DOLOMITE&ILEANA DOLOMITE PROPOSED 6.5 HIGH LINE OF EXISTING EXISTINGI STORY FRAME OI1S OODEN STOCKADE FENCE S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-17.4 ROPOSED 6.5' 8 g = I SHED TO BE RENOVATED AND g g REMOVE d H INCORPORATED INTO MAIN EO SEE SIGN W/ACOUSTIC BARRIER EXISTING HIGH STOCKADE y Z RELOCATE EXISTING 1 STRUCTURE a REMOVE FENCE FENCE , QTORY SCHEDULE EXISTING , ° GARAGE TOM REMAIN THIS SHEET) I STORY FENCE ' , S07 44'40"E 310.00' 622.78' S07°38'10"E I - SIGN , _ ��� i•+ O a ..•>-YJ,..o.-c...M,"_s < -r.,, r ---c•S--._c5-- --- g__--_ S__.-- g S S_-__ S S S-� w 9 w r.... O Y __ 'rF^yr^%. iF S-__ S ... ('� • ED ' s e ° � EXISTING L � 630 Johnson Avenue Suite 7 -o fs': "=,e ar=:: s_ s- - n A s PROPOSED NEW PROPOS I TO RE --j s - s s- s-- s s s s - s - E ' s;cFed:?3en:. _ _ U - s --- s- - DRI • • -: GO 1 PERVIOUS w s- - s-- o OVERFED Jnr."A �� IRRIGATION 1 N Bohemia NY 11716-2618 _ s s -- m s 11 0 s-- -r m o m\ PARKING 2'-8" W Phone: (631) 589-6353 • Fax: (631) 589-8705 9 oma__ s-- s-- s-- s- mo I I Q o ❑ PROP s--- s rr >ti s E IST'G. I- / ' 4 m ° s "" ' ` IJ L o E-mail: INFO@PWGROSSER.COM n + PERVIOUS - j `�. � f1VER - - EXISTING TO BE __ o 0 Ci O PARKING e j /i// / / / / / / / i ---- s s �� o REMOVED Z W' - < } �b CONSULTANTS EXISTING TO 2 STORY / •/ /// / / / / / / -� O Z / ,' / - s - - STRUCTURE To REMAIN SIGN O < y / / / �j/ //-` / / s • PROPOSED RESTAURANT I cb X / / j ARB GE / // / s-- s AREAS O s FF:27.5 311T-2^ r FUTURE 1-STORY 75 x R S D OTEL// / / s O s-s RDPOSE / / / / /,' / EVENT SPACE X Qa /, �F£L.320�/'/ ' / RONTYAR s-s-s- '/ •/ ; / / FF.EL.32.0' __ 2 1 w , / ,:/,'/ � //" , / / / � --� '--11`-0`_ PROPOSED ETBACK /�• / ' / / / 2T-0" EXISTING STRUCTURE 26'-3 x 50' / / / / " // /'' / //' / / ' R7-8(SEE SIGN LTYP. g_p• i - = Z Z o / / / SCHEDULE /slate THIS SHEET) g O / WALKWAY o ? J A X O ,/ ' �,%' / ❑ ROPOSEDPERVI US o Y / , / / R7-1(SEE SIGN - --U--�� ---- __ uc TRUCK r RESTAURANT PA KING m c Z Z SIGN 25 s /j / - / / / / // u u uur; crunraaoannnroeoonrnror"- $SY B V9A1 q°R°°OL' LOADING slates EXISTING TO BE (GRASS PAVERS) tq m t7 s LAWN I SCULPTURE SCHEDULE ; BERTH AREA REMOVED � � O O Z r ' X s/s �ROPOSFI .5'HIGH GARDEN THIS SHEET) "m m m 75 50 s 21 -1^ WOODEN STOCKADE FENCE �/ / O PROPOSED PERVIOU 11 6 g REQ'D � U p / n. H c FRONT Y c REpR 20 o WI ACOUSTIC BARRIER / ❑. HOTEL PARKING W OSED X SETBACK I' Q y P TY / / r (GRASS PAVERS) - ° IS > ° GRADE EL 30.5 O W µ� x I R5-1 (SEE SIGN N NEW PROPOSED DRIVEWAY I w v u . nr SCHEDULE b AND PARKING w Z Z 24'.0 PARKING^ s _)k\-HOT COTTAGE 1 f o / /' m (�/� CHESS BOARD /�/// c THIS SHEET) I r73 __ 25 AREA w. .:. �� IVn�I U LL LL / nLL m - POOL CABANAS ;/ /' r t - a-n--a-o -o - 25 9 20 9 a TW:30.5----- - TW:30.5_-_ -- u,_ // DECORATIVE s`" �SHED �-_.a--a- - -- --- -- -- - F N04°45'20"W REap O BW:27.25 BW:27.25 178.OD' x 3 - YARp / /j POND z R7-1 (SEE SIGN $ cb SETB COTTAGE ) / R3-1(SEE SIGN SCHEDULE d pROppSEU 2 2 HOT PROPOSED 2.5'H /�/ SCHEDULE PROPOSED 6.5'HIGH THIS SHEET) TUBpERNtOU s s ,. RETAINING WALL GRADE EL.27.5' + i // THIS SHEET WOODEN cb U OVERF�O EL: EL'•32� ) STOCKADE FENCE w 16'-0" ts'-o^ b R1-5(SEE SIGN z ppRKtNG ---� HOT / // PROPOSED SCHEDULE v o I TUB _ - Z o PERVIOUS Z Y '{_-_-_ / n , ch OVERFLOW THIS SHEET) 3 °a COTTAGE3 fb�iE (1-D i Q 2�,1" c. ¢ I a - PARKING R7-8&R7-8b(SEE SIGN a o HOT / SCHEDULE POOL AREA / o b � 7UB /'�, '�' / � � NYR3-14 SEE SIGN THIS SHEET o sl o s s / / / #' / PROPOSTBACK T ( ) 20`p H" ° PLA CO RTS / j�/ YARD SETBACK R6TRUCK -5P r{ SCHEDULE W THIS SHEET) > O ftp Z° HOT l.___..._ - / / O LOADIN (SEE SIGN o o v U �cb, UU - ? m TUB BERTH AREA SCHEDULE a a o0 GIN LIGHTED THIS SHEET) rc ��HOT COTTAGE4 ,T { O BW:27.20 BW:27.25 ENCLAVES SIGN e 00 LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF !� b" TW:30.5 RAMP- TW:30.5 RAMP 0 (SEE ARCHITECTURAL p PROPOSED 2T. s -•ri�V,_TUB p EUGEN TOMASIC&MIRELLA TOMASIC c, PARKING " "' -- PLANS) LIRR N AREA O rr >rnaua „Donor nr noraarc r � � ll(P�A ro°caopO00Qp•aononoon:rr 0'-0' S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-14 LOCUST LANE PROPERTY Z 12 11158 10" WALKWAY �- - onanr, urarnrn. , ,nonrnarn R4-7A(SEE SIGN R6-5P(SEE SIGN -- -- LINE 4 t 24�o I d OpOSEpREPRYARO 2t i I_� _ SCHEDULE SCHEDULE pR I H�9p b, 66 6. THIS SHEET) THIS SHEET) bPROPOSED ia[�� OVERPERVFLOW a v� RBAGE 5-0^ 9' -+ -- '- _ _ b PARKING cb J]AREA, C C v W -_I o SIGN ; PROPOSED PARKING AREA �I Y LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF OIM �✓ g' a a NEW PROPOSED NEWAY _ I JANET L.RYAN S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-13 l� o n i a W t= < - o - ---- ----- 0 o ac) w 22'-0" o rr rn w w rn 41 � 1y__0__0_13 --a-�-a- -�.--�•--o---a---o-n--n--oo-a-o--o- -a -U----a---o..-o----v--� - I _ _�._� ---o--o-a-- a---o- ---o-- 1 N05°30'50"1N 616.5T PROPOSED 6.5'HIGH TRUCK 1 WOODEN LOADING b -rN- STOCKADE FENCE LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF BERTH AREA R4 8A(SEE SIGN \-R4-7A(SEE SIGN 7 R7-8(SEE SIGN R7-18 R7-8b SCHEDULE SCHEDULE 1 CHARLES W.WITZKE SCHEDULE (SEE SIGN R4-8A(SEE SIGN 6 b N S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-28.1 THIS SHEET) SCHEDULE SCHEDULE THIS SHEET) PROPOSED HIS SHEET) LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF 5 ADDRESSED FEIS COMMENTS 05/11/2021 (TYP.FOR 4) THIS SHEET) THIS SHEET) PILLES REALTY HOLDING LLC PERVIOUS 4 REVISED PER CLIENT'S REQUEST 02/18/2021 (TYP.FOR 2) OVERFLOW S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-12 3 ADDRESSED COMMENTS DATED 12/9/19 04/08/2020 R7-8b(SEE SIGN PARKING 2 ADDRESSED DEIS COMMENTS 07/17/2019 SCHEDULE PROPOSED SITE PLAN N05°30'50"W THIS SHEET) 1 REV.TO 44 ROOMS-UPDATE UTILITIES 04/11/2017 51,34' Number Revision Description Revision Date SCALE: 1" = 40' Designed By Dale Submitted 0 40 80 TC 01/20/17 Drawn By Date Created SCALE: 1" - 40' TC�,T os/2x/16 Approved By Scale BG AS SHOWN Client s. THE ENCLAVES i 1 1e 1 SOUTHOLD, NY ProIect Existing Proposed Notes RESTAURANT PARKING SPACES REQUIRED SPACES PROVIDED Political and Property Boundaries 74 SEATS/3 24.6 SPACES(IADA INC.) 38 SPACES(2 ADA INC.) -- "--'---------'- --- SIZE OF SIGN SIZE OF SIGN �' L� OR SIGN SIGNS OR MUTCD 2009 ED. SIGN SIGNS OR MUTCD 2009 ED. SYMBOL CONVENTIONAL SYMBOL CONVENTIONAL 1 PER 100 SF FLOOR AREA 3,806 SF=38 SPACES(2 ADA INC.) 38 SPACES(2 ADA INC.) DESIGNATION PLAQUES SECTION N0. ROAD DESIGNATION PLAQUES SECTION N0. ROAD PROVIDING 2 GRASS PAVED OVER FLOW PARKING ON SITE HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE PARKING No TOTAL RESTAURANT PROVIDED:27 PAVED SPACES(2 ADA INC.)AND 11 GRASS PAVED SPACES:38 TOTAL WITH VAN-ACCESSIBLE PARKING PARKING - R7-1 TIE NO PARKING 12"x18" R5-1 DO NOT ENTER 30"x30" HOTEL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED SPACES PROVIDED (�j� (�j Project Address: 1/UNIT-44 UNITS 44 SPACES(2 ADA) 96 SPACES(4 ADA INC.) PESERVE 56655 ROUTE 25 OR I ! R7-8 FITS ADA PARKING -►{ 96'MIN 96"MIN}-- ® 12"X18" Id SOUTHOLD 11EMPLOYYEE(12)+1/UNIT(44) 56 SPACES(2 ADA,INC.) 96 SPACES(4 ADA) �96'MIN NYR3-14 ALL TRAFFIC - 24"x30" SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK PROVIDING 26 GRASS PAVED OVER FLOW PARKING ON SITE R7-8b ACCESSIBLE VAN ACCESSIBLE 18"Xg" County Tax Map Number. Contract Number. TOTAL HOTEL PARKING PROVIDED:96 PAVED SPACES(4 ADA INC.),26 GRASS OVERFLOW SPACES:122 TOTAL °-` - 1000-63-3-15 ALTERNATIVE HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE PARKING PAINTED R6-5P � � ROUND ABOUT 30"x30" Regulatory Reference Number: WITH VAN-ACCESSIBLE PARKING DIRECTIONAL _ - TOTAL SITE REQUIRED:38 RESTAURANT+56 HOTEL= 94 PARKING SPACES ARROW - The of Drawing: COLOR-WHITE ENTER TOTAL SITE PROVIDED:38 RESTAURANT+122 HOTEL=160 TOTAL PARKING SPACES EO ONLY ENTER ONLY 18"x18" "PROVIDED OVERFLOW:40 HOTEL PAVED+26 GRASS PAVED=66 OVERFLOW 32"MIN 160"MIN, 96'MIN, VAN R1-1 5 TO P STOP 28.05 30"x30" PROPOSED SITE oy I R4-7A K-► KEEP RIGHT - 24"x30" R�BT TRAFFIC CONTROL R3-1 � i t NO RIGHT TURN - 24"x24" N _- -__--- - -- -- 3 STANDARD PARKING SPACES KEEP R4-8A �- KEEP RIGHT - 24"x30" AND PARKING PLAN LEFT ACCESSIBLE SITES AND EXTERIOR FACILITIES REQUIRED ADA PARKING TOTAL PARKING MINIMUM NUMBER IN LOT OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES v Drawing Number. g 1 TO 25 1 Q 51 TO 75 3 U 26 TO 50 2 GRASS PAVED PARKING SPACES FINAL AP •• •• � ou 76 TO 100 4 t1 p 101 T0150 5 G`�E i t` .'` L`� 00 ou 151 TO 200 6 ;. 7 E 201 TO 300 7 ..... .:.:............ C�� ( s HOTEL RESTAURANT sheet3 16 of Q PWGC Project Number. 96 ONSITE PAVED PARKING STALL PROVIDED 27 ONSITE PAVED PARKING STALL PROVIDED w w ---- 3 STALLS ADA COMPLIANT PARKING STALLS 1 STALLS ADA COMPLIANT PARKING STALLS -- Unau horhed aeere6on or addition z _aela"�_ rn to this drawing and related documents AVG 16 01 w� A VA ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 1 ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL Is a violation of sectlon 7209 �o Of the New York State Education Law 3 0 a a :ranran;acncccnnr.:ccr.nnnnnan LAWN I SCULPTURE ' GARDEN t ROPOSED 6.5'HIGH /; -4 WOODEN STOCKADE FENCE !- //,''/i c PROPOSED PERVIOU 2 6� W/ACOUSTIC BARRIER i/ _ e HOTEL PARKING Strategic Environmental and Engineering Solutions c (GRASS PAVERS) g 9� g - r.:r ........... ._. r.r GRADE EL.30.5' HOT COTTAGE i 0L ss. !' a / . 3RIRKINGY nz CHESSBOARD REANG s s TUB TIMZN- TZ, �;, j ci OUTSIDE SWEPT PATH Icr. 630 Johnson Avenue. . Suite 7 POOL CABANAS /X/ PATH°r �- PATH OF FRONT WHEEL TW:30.5_ TW:30.5- // y y a BW:27.25 - EW:2T.25 / DE POORAOTIVE cr SHI 90° Bohemia . NY. 11716-2618 < / 4 . Phone: (631) 589-6353 . Fax: (631) 589-8705 a INSIDE SWEPT PATH L � COTTAGE2 HOT PROPOSED2.5'H 1 E-mail: INFO@PWGROSSER.COM s S- RETAINING WALL • - - GRADE EL.27.5' +EL: j25 / F 0 HOT / I _.. o CONSULTANTS � TUB /, ', - z I / % r.: C w a COTTAGE 3 a LU cc wLu HOT POOLAREA /, :i / 0 c_ o 30.00 4�B /, OI s ..,�,�---........-. s M .. _ PLA CO RTSCD c t o o Fv N a R L.2. co HOT ' / cc a Oa :t L8A 72 z d TUB v 4.O ft 38.0 ft ° \�L-- - STEERING LOCK ANGLE=31.8 dg. HOT COTTAGE 4 BW:27.20 BW:2725 z z s s TUB TW:30.5 RAMP- TWO:30.5 RAMP n, 2 ACHIEVED STEERING ANGLE: l:L1UJULIUil UilU L'Uli U[:iUUU000JJU;I tI ILU LUL L'UCUUUUi:Iil UUUGIUGGC ,-0• ' It WALKWAY � � cuuL�ua�;�ouuuccucauuuuuu�uuir�c�.���!����i���uur.urcounu;�u;ruuuuuceer 4 4.00 20.00 � 30dg.SWEEP ANGLE:19.1deg. 60 dg.SWEEP ANGLE:26.5 deg. SU-9M 90 deg.SWEEP ANGLE:29.6 deg. feet _ 120 deg.SWEEP ANGLE:30.9 deg. d 150 dg.SWEEP ANGLE:31.4 deg. Width : 8.00 6.0 R I _ _ d Track 8.00 180 deg.SWEEP ANGLE:31.6 deg. a { -- ___I. p t Lock to Lock Time 6.0 - "I 11 1', o Steering Angle : 31.6 8.0 ft � LU IC4 PROPOSED PARKING AREA 2 NEW PROPOSED DRIVEWAY E I M torn mtt(us I. ------------ 31 4 l` SU-9M -' AASHTOM 2011 (US) I I Ll 111 i ---- 22;-0' co 11111 Lfco (c)2019 Tra-ft Solutions,Inc.All rights reserved. -C-p---p---O p p--6--0_--0._-p-_--0--p--p---p._p---0-_'.0----C-p---C___--p---0-_ff---d'-- 9--p._ O p_ .p_--a---p-fl--p- -,v-C---O---C--G__._p---F---a---p---0---p-- N05°30'50"W 616.57' I w PROPOSED 6.5'HIGH WOODEN STOCKADEFENCE LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF CHARLES VV.WITZKE S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-28.1 PROPOSED PERVIOUS PROPOSED TRAFFIC CIRCULATION PLAN PARKING PROPOSED PROPOSED BOX TRUCK DETAILS BOX TRUCK SCALE: 1" = 20' SCALE: 1" = 40' 0 40 80 0 20 40 SCALE: 1" = 20' SCALE: 1" = 40' s '--^-,•�1.�a-�-^--p•q+�- w:JP- /„� // / // /./� ,/ -/ / / ��: n:.i rtonnacr: ,nn nnnreno n a n S�o-s o o r n r c r : LAWN/SCULPTURE I ROPOSED 6.6 HIGH GARDEN WOODEN STOCKADE FENCE 7 PROPOSED PERVIOU 2 Fl W1 ACOUSTIC BARRIER i HOTEL PARKING 6 (GRASS PAVERS) 5 3 ADDRESSED COMMENTS DATED 12/9/19 04/08/2020 GRADE EL.30.5' :/'/ n 4 COTTAGE 1 Fz ' °ROPOSE[Y \_HOT :. ADDRESSED DEIS COMMENTS 07/17/2019 CHESSBOARD 171 Z �, 1 REV.TO 44 ROOMS-UPDATE UTILITIES 04/11/2017 NARKING s TUB J k 4 / / J Number Revision Description 4'1'11Revision'Dale 4REA �^ ��` U" ry POOL CABANAS > TW:30.5 TW:30.5___ SHI OUTSIDE SWEPT PATH .' DECORATIVE � Designed By Date Submitted I � '^''�t"'>-.�...v.....�.ww......,.......- BW:27.25 BW:27.25 � - - J� / /;j/ POND PATH OF FRONT WHEEL TC Ul/2O/1'I 22211tfff"' �- a � COTTAGE 2 90" Drawn By Date Created HOT PROPOSED 2.5'H i'j / � r; TQLT 08/23/16 INSIDE SWEPT PATH A roved B Scale � PP Y TU9 RETAINING WALL L BG AS SHOWN GRADE EL.27.5 +E(: F EL.3.0 TUB Client: THE ENCLAVES WHOT COTTAGES POOL AREA /' 56655 ROUTE 25 N TUB // z > 24.50 3 S �._.. o o 29� T, SOUTHOLD, NY I w PLA COM - 22� 1 3 GRADE EL.21.5' ' o o 4.0 ft 7 Project. W. { `HOT a a T 30.01 ?p. TUB �: 0 0 X of I 1 Z w 4.00 15.50 STEERING LOCK ANGLE=31.1 deg. I i_-- s HOT COTTAGE g BW:27.20 BW:27.25 " 3 Z U) w TUB TW:30.5 RAMP- TW:30.5 RAMP ; Stretch Limousine 15.5 ft ACHIEVED STEERING ANGLE: 9 2 d SITE PLAN O / ; 0 feet 30 dg.SWEEP ANGLE:19.0 deg. ocnn....eo coo uaa_tuoa uueunuoc �oconoccunoucecuouoc:rcc �1-01 WALKWAY - nconoccecnoencacvneuncnr.r.nnc�` S. A� W�ib( ,npnannoQnuceccpnnn�oa_ 4 4 Width 6.00 60 deg.SWEEP ANGLE:26.2 deg. 90 deg.SWEEP ANGLE:29.1 - N Track 6.00 - 20 deg SWEEP ANGLE: 0 3ddg. O � � Lock to Lock Time 6.0 Steering Angle 31.1 5.0 ft 150 deg.SWEEP ANGLE:30.8 deg. b 16.0 ft I 180 deg.SWEEP ANGLE:311.0 deg. Project Address: n56655 ROUTE 25 WPROPOSED PARKING AREA I o S O UTH O LD r� 0' �,,,� NEW PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ARCHITECTURAL e SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK I 31 I County Tax Map Number: Contract Number: 1000-63-3-15 I I 4 1 >>> c � o (c)2019 Trensoll solutions,inc.All rights reserved. ----I cc Regulatory Reference Number: 22-0" I o ' N Title of Drawing: - ----0-p---c---o--o----p---fl-o--0-a---p-p -c--p--a---a--p -�--a--p-----a--p-p p a----o---p--p---0--p�---p-- "`�: ��� ��� �---0-=-�•-a---a--p---p-p---0 -0 p-p---0--0---a��o---n�o--n--c -�--n a--ap fl--n-p---p-6--fl-� 1 L PROPOSED N05°30'50"W 616.57' ? PROPOSED SITE o H WOODEN STOCKADE FENCE LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF CIRCULATION � CHARLES W.WITZKE S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-28.1 PROPOSED PROPOSED TRAFFIC CIRCULATION PLAT �RKING°W PROPOSED STRETCH LIMOUSINE PLAN AND DETAILS STRETCH LIMOUSINE DETAILS Drawing Number. SCALE: 1" = 40' SCALE: 1" = 20' FINAL MAP0 g 0 40 80 0 20 40 REVIEWED BY ZBA an SCALE: 1" = 40' SEE DECISION SCALE: 1" = 20' DATED_I � _ / 1 Sheet of 5 _ 4 16 g T PWGC Project Number. rii w Unsdra drawing and ion documents AVG1601 on to this drawing and related documents � Is a violation of Section 7209 0 of the New York State Education Law o a St UJ_ Z n, 0- M — — TOWN HARBOR w � — — — — LANE o OUCS > o Cr o o LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF o N z VALERIE M.SCOPAZ LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF Z 5 N PROPOSED PERVIOUS O tv S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-16 RESTAURANT PARKINGROPOSED8.5' ANTHONY FORGIONE LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF REMOVE z r f- WOOD POSTS (GRASS PAVERS) HIGH STOCKADE VINCENT DOLOMITE&ILEANA DOLOMITE EXISTING p z U WITH NETTING PROPOSED6.5'HIGH LINEOFEXISTING FENCE S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-17.3 PROPOSED 6.5'HIGH FENCE Q Q EXISTING 1 STORY FRAME „✓ y,,,.� (A f-""'"-`� "' '-`-1 STOCKADE FENCE DRIVEWAY TO BE SHED TO BE RENOVATED AND OODEN STOCKADE FENCE REMOVE S.C.T.M. N0. 1000-63-03-17.4 ROPOSED 6.5' w J � � REMOVED INCORPORATED INTO MAIN W1 ACOUSTIC BARRIER EXISTING HIGH STOCKADE •' Z RELOCATE EXISTING STRUCTURE a Strategic Environmental and Engineering Solutions REMOVE FENCE FENCE m ; Q STORY FRAME FENCE EXISTING y' G ;, $O7°44'4O"E GARAGE TO REMAIN 310.00' SIGN S07°38'10"E 622.78' a .�.�� TEXISTING WELL PROPOSED ri O BE CW7 s—- EW PRO OSED ,•-.: �,n;;`•a(±w itvnce s---- s-- s---— s --- s-- s s s-- s s---� s---- PERVIOUS DRI��:N • RELOCATED AS �I �, 630 Johnson Avenue Suite 7 OVERFLO � IRRIGATION WELL � N s-- s--- g s- s s- — s— s---- s_ s PARKING i1 • • �, I I ¢ w Bohemia NY 11716-2618 0 �. %PROf'c>c15 – s -- s--- S -- Ph 705 / V' - s """ (STING TO BE `�� one: (631) 589-6353 . Fax: (631) 589-8 o s nay s / �xl OVER �y J z_ 0 E-mail: INFO@PWGROSSER.COM PARKING QC %^` '� / EXISTING TO 2 STORY a Z cb s- — —_ s -- O STRUCTURE TO REMAIN CONSULTANTS -- — - s s - O SIGN O j * %/ // /,' % i / /:, / • PROPOSED RESTAURANT a i / ARB GE cb v / / O s FF:27.5 p r� nSX j // / / / i'/ /� — s— s -AREAS-_— s / j FUTURE 1-STORY I < L S H EL // / / // EVENT SPACE s I O Y s---5 — L FF.EL.32.0 --- -------- ---- E / FEIl32 0�' ry^" s s— s— I I PROPOSED ADDITION ' 22'-0' ^ EXISTING STRUCTUR r W W 7c 50 /- /slate Z Z t ^� v �// i / �,'' / // t t Q Q 5 O 0 WALKWAY o J J a ROPOSED PERVIOUS o SIGN >'Y / n, r RESTAURANT PARKING 't a Z Z 25' � y^Y vY •w•w // ///' %/ '/% / /''/ / / OJ�,SOi.tl[ ]Ct]�O OGCLUU °(]n�U�q°U GY GC CGOOO : SIBt 11/(35 QED lyd' �� EXISTING TO BE (GRASS PAVERS) cn f' m r 50r �t s �X a r<% ROPOSED 6.5'HIGH / ' LAWNGARDENLTURE o REMOVED^a m m m U 75 g WOODEN STOCKADE FENCE ' / PROPOSED PERVIOU W1 ACOUSTIC BARRIER /' / n HOTEL PARKING $ W Q K n u (GRASS PAVERS) W Y%• < GRADE EL.30.5' i / s W o NEW PROPOSED DRIVEWAY W w U = / Q AND PARKING F Z o a a �xr^PROPOSECP HOT COTTAGE 1 I U U v % PARKING S S TUB ^ // CHESS BOARD n LL LL 25 S ^AREA i / k " POOL CABANAS ❑ TW:30.5 _ __---- TW:30.5 // DECORATIVE N04°45'20'W -- - -- ~ k y IA BW:27.25EEO BW:27.25 i, //, POND SHED cb 178.00' r * 3 COTTAGE 2 /' 2 I OSEO nk HOT PROPOSED 2.5'H PROPOSED 6.5'HIGH PROP OOS k s S TUB RETAINING WALL // % eec WOODEN pER RFIOW y hj y GRADE EL.27.5' +EL: 7._25 F 0' / m / STOCKADE FENCE cb w pp KING v kY I HOT - a TUB I PROPOSED V t? m z_ PERVIOUS L 3 Z OVERFLOW Nr ;`< y vk** a ¢ ¢ PARKING SI ar`* ( COTTAGE j RIDS I / , 3 4 rwi) TUB POOL AREA i' / o c U Yk k p I PLA CO RTS a Z yY;< a - W w ti a O GRADE EL.27.5' HOT --- 0 V m 22 / nr o m p cb ` TUB �u a a I � Q G I HOT COTTAGE BW:27.20 BW:27.25 0 Z 1 � LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF ' .5 RAMP— =:30.5—RAMP TW'30 TUB EUGEN TOMASIC MI PROPOSED Tek,'<' S S 2 & RELLA TOMASIC N PARKING � .�/�� G LIRR a � AREA '" *"„^ O '"" -•'� -`•' ^^` - � t". -"-"- '-- n b �.-0. S.C.T.M, N0. 1000-63-03-14 LOCUST LANE .N „ ^�,- ^ WALKWAY -nGGGGnnanr..:r,r.:r,nenoaanannr,nr.r.:r.y- r.n,i:anunnannnnnc:crnGnn. .. 'A' r.n Gnnnannnnnn r.r.:er nnnn PROPERTY r O kk i inn Gnnnnr.r.nr: LINE Z r` 12 -- <' CL wv yY y ' �!► c PROPOSED a I I PERVIOUS71 ° ARBAGE OVERFLOW _ PARKING cb iv? AREA cs' LD b SIGN 20 0r� PROPOSED PARKING AREA X' �` LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF M NEW PROPOSE JANET L.RYAN - --- --I S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-13 <�' u� 1N •kR�•.x `r,';, x � `:xy'i'� '>x ,Y`C c�� �; u`t v�y .;:� I I I 'Qo 1 ,.� k„•t> .`ckC n v*r v,sv `<�, t�� �h .r ,v Yv >,Y_ AY A � ----------- -0 fes'--0--o---0 --O—d—G o o—°--°___�—.�---fl--'--0—o O—a---G--O--4—G--O--0--6—O---Q— o--v--G--C- C----v—fl-0---fl-----0---3_C- 0—fl-�• v fl--n-- -o—fl--o—o--a—v o---°—n N05°30'50'W 616.57' PROPOSED 6.5'HIGH WOODEN N STOCKADE FENCE LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF d' r CHARLES W.WITZKE LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF 7 N S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-28.1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROPOSED PILLES REALTY HOLDING LLC 6 PERVIOUS 5 ADDRESSED FEIS COMMENTS 05/11/2021 OVERFLOW S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-12 n r PARKING 4 REVISED PER CLIENT'S REQUEST 02/18/2021 SCALE: 1 = 40 3 ADDRESSED COMMENTS DATED 12/9/19 04/08/2020 N05 1.34'"W 2 ADDRESSED DEIS COMMENTS 07/17/2019 51.34' 0 40 80 1 REV.TO 44 ROOMS-UPDATE UTILITIES 04/11/2017 Number Revision Description Revision Date SCALE: 1" = 40' Designed By Date Suhmilled TC 01/20/17 Drawn By Date Created TC\LT 08/23/16 Approved By Scale BG AS SHOWN .may Client t 1 oft THE ENCLAVES - - - ...... 56655 ROUTE 25 Existing Proposed Notes SOUTHOLD, NY Political and Property Boundaries Project: RESTAURANT PARKING SPACES REQUIRED SPACES PROVIDED P '`J —_ ACCESSIBLE SITES AND EXTERIOR FACILITIES REQUIRED ADA PARKING 74 SEATS 13 24.6 SPACES(I ADA INC.) 38 SPACES(2 ADA INC.) TOTAL PARKING MINIMUM NUMBER OR 1 PER 100 SF FLOOR AREA 3,806 SF=38 SPACES(2 ADA INC.) 38 SPACES(2 ADA INC.) IN LOT OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES PROVIDING 2 GRASS PAVED OVER FLOW PARKING ON SITE HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE PARKING 1 TO 25 1 SITE PLAN TOTAL RESTAURANT PROVIDED:29 PAVED SPACES(2 ADA INC.)AND 11 GRASS PAVED SPACES:40 TOTAL WITH VAN-ACCESSIBLE PARKING 26 TO 50 2 NO ADDITIONAL EVENT PARKING AT RESTAURANT 51 TO 75 3 76 T0100 4 HOTEL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED SPACES PROVIDED 101 TO 150 5 11 UNIT-44 UNITS 44 SPACES(2 ADA) 34 SPACES(4 ADA INC.) - 96"MIN 96"MINI- 151 TO 200 6 Project Address: 96"MIN 201 TO 300 7 56655 ROUTE 25 OR 1/EMPLOYYEE(12)+1/UNIT(44) 56 SPACES(2 ADA,INC.) 38 SPACES(4 ADA) 11 HOTEL RESTAURANT SOUTHOLD PROVIDING 22 GRASS PAVED OVER FLOW'PARKING ON SITE 22 GRASS PAVED OVERFLOW ALTERNATIVE HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE PARKING 96 ON SITE PAVED PARKING STALL PROVIDED 27 ON SITE PAVED PARKING STALL PROVIDED SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK PROVIDING 80 VALET PARKING SPACES 80 VALET PARKING WITH VAN-ACCESSIBLE PARKING 3 STALLS ADA COMPLIANT PARKING STALLS 1 STALLS ADA COMPLIANT PARKING STALLS County Tax Map Number: Contract Number. r r 1 ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 1 ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 1000-63-3-15 Regulatory Reference Number: TOTAL HOTEL PARKING PROVIDED:38 PAVED SPACES(4 ADA INC.), �fY 22 GRASS OVERFLOW SPACES, 13 VAN IN 60"MIN. 96"MIN. Title of Drawing: 80 VALET SPACES:140 TOTAL HOTEL EVENT PARKING REQUIRED: OO GUESTS ALTERNATIVE 10 HOTEL ROOMS x 2 GUESTS PER ROOM=20 15%OF EVENT GUESTS DROPPED BY FOR HIRE VEHICLES=37 GUESTS TOTAL NUMBER OF GUESTS NEEDING PARKING=193 GUESTS O 20, STANDARD PARKING SPACES PROPOSED VALET 193 GUESTS 13 GUESTS PER VEHICLE=64.33=65 PARKING STALLS 10 EVENT STAFF AT 1 VEHICLE PER STAFF=10 EVENT STAFF PARKING STALLS TOTAL EVENT PARKING REQUIRED=75 STALLS _ PARKING PLA14 9'MIN. EVENT PARKING /.' ' Drawing Number. c TOTAL HOTEL PARKING 140 PARKING STALLS VALET PARKING SPACES / 18' SINAL 111AP SET PARKING(NON-EVENT)=38 PARKING STALLS(INCLUSIVE OF 4 ADA PARKING STALLS) • HOTEL EMPLOYEE PARKING=12 PARKING STALLS - ® 0 W a REVIEWED BY ZBA EVENT PARKING=75 PARKING STALLS 18'MIN. I E ADDITIONAL PARKING =15 PARKING STALLS SCE DECISION � s a�G� `` Sheet of o GRASS PAVED PARKING SPACES " 1 p� a�� \ eJ 16 T 11 PWGC Project Number: u i(ii - Unauthorized alteration or addition to this drawing and related documents AVG 1601 -w-� Is a violation of Section 7209 0 of the New York State Education Law o a� W O a TOWN HARBOR M - - - - LANE O C) > o W o 0 o LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF Q I : Z VALERIE M.SCOPAZ y , O N N S.C.T.M. N0. 1000-63-03-16 PROPOSED PERVIOUS LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF REMOVE Z RESTAURANT PARKING ROPOSED6.5' ANTHONY FORGIONE r �- WOOD POSTs (GRASS PAVERS) HIGH STOCKADE VINCENT DOLOMITE&ILEANA DOLOMITE EXISTING 0 Z 0 WITH NETTING PROPOSED 6.5 HIGH LINE OF EXISTING EXISTING I STORY FRAME RIM Zss'E -.. S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-17.3 ROPOSED6.5'HIGH FENCE m Q U) C"�"""'''- " "� STOCKADE FENCE DRIVEWAY TO BE OODEN STOCKADE FENCELIS.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-17.4 ROPOSED 6.5' c = SHED TO BE RENOVATED AND ✓` ' REMOVE 4 F-- n REMOVED INCORPORATED INTO MAIN WI ACOUSTIC BARRIER EXISTING 4HIGH STOCKADE Z RELOCATE EXISTING 1 STRUCTURE We P.10 a REMOVE FENCE Q ° RIM zs" Strategic Environmental and Engineering Solutions EXISTING FENCE 47_ u i aP sT �- STORY FRAME rEF EC NE f, g g• g FENCE 28 ---"O"' RlM eon 7,4440"\ GARAGE TO REMAIN 310.00- FENCE 32 2B 26 2s 622.78' ;1 2e r \ 1 P R SO - 31 30 S07°38'10"E �_ r SIGN ¢ _ s _is \ I , ""'I EXI TIN L S -- - --- - - -- S G WELL I S _ o . ,,,;;;, ,,t,„4 r=> a E4n4 tc"s-- s- s<v / ED 1 • € 'Cr E3tG;' D A _ D_,s +ctar'=;tart.. " _ _ _ DRIVEWAY s PROPOSED NEW PROPOS - .l]O • S---_-__ S_ s - - g_�_ g-____ g _ S S I W.. m g PERVIOUS :gip 1 R�O�ATEDAS -� s---- w s-- - s- ai o u s OVERFLO 1 \ IRRIGATIONWELL I 26 + N 630 Johnson Avenue. Suite 7 \ 31 Dl➢LS, N g V' 29 s s"-----� g s- m DLP.FE \ PARKING al _ \ --- g-- o \ OPROP 9 RIM IDS B __ g- D y RDRAd R°FEC NEDEPM '• \ �`� ' p IW- Bohemia . NY. 11716-26 8 %-�\ 4 I -ITFIFE - l7_ S () " ,....: PERVIOUS 30 a> m - RDMAa ,2E�FFD VEDEPR " `o s \ B ' " '___ __ = Phone: (631) 589-6353 . Fax: (631)589-8705 EXISTING TO E Q E-mail: INFO@PWGROSSER.COM OVER -. RIM za.T 1z EFFecTrvE DEPDI s � Z / . ;, ; , / / / a, . REMOVED 2 '^ p • PARKING e / .'// / /, ,zEFFECTrhDEPrR 's // S V J Cb EDEPm / ;-j / / ��- / s O EXISTING T02STORY 2 Z _ __ _ _ STRUCTURE TO REMAIN Ti A. • g s s O PROPOSED RESTAURANT I SIGN CONSULTANTS 296.5 BGE p s FF:27.5 coo 28 s-- s sREAs s�- s------- I I DBYFRcrnE FUTURE 1-STORY 27 _ -- - B-- OPOS 75s O /' i P O SE H EL / s N RIM252s 1T-2" 3 1 X \ a \ i/ is// // FF/E 3 '/ // / EVENT SPACE 26 p g DEQ RONTYAR / /'/ a s-s s- / FF.EL.32.0' ommommo __ ---- / co \ --___ I POSED ETBACK V' 0 22'-0' 9' ��I ^ EXISTINGSTRUC W W , 25 3 X I 50' \ o / / /%/i/ /// // 29 p� TYP. 9'-0' /slate 26 o t - }, QZ QZ WALKWAYAAn Q �/ / � / �/` ,�� �'% �,. _----- � �►''� � gOPOSE PERV US o -�- M_ r L I RE T� KING 'a @ ri Z Z SIGN 3- a In.ca,.{n:Tnars ' oDlaclnnncr.:nnnnann.inn�nnn" .:.'VED'WAIKWAY n" dPR-, slat el EXISTING TO BE (GRASSP RS) O O Z / LAWNISCULPTURE 3 3_ 3F � REMOVED 4 m RECID sp DIP LS-2 G[ LCB Pd m X s s 1" � WIM�11l,JG POOL / 'j Tp M GARDEN c 3 w m mall 75' S0' / ROPOSED 6.5'HIGH \ � I.._. s 21 1 I DWOMENSTOCKADi, CE RR" DRAINAGE > 2 RIM 2ss o 6 U p$E R 1rEFFE DEPR 27 aPy,, /' / ao ,zEFFECTNEDEmM ❑c PROPOSEDPERVIOU rEFEcmE rl Q FRONTY c IC BARRIER , i ` OEP H o OSEDR� 20' � s�" 6l,�T \ RM ms / / \M HOTEL PARKING " N SETBACK v L1J Q P TY (GRASS PAVERS) i 15-0" W DLPi GRADE EL.30:\ / // \ \ - epi ,-.._ LCB IZ EFFECTN pEPTH \ O w �\ TnL P RIMf55 LCBP9 /' / RIM 4a {,," NEW PROPmt3EOTDRRm_ m 4 RIM 25A - W L) \ ��--- �.. .u.-:,w,-+ fY EFFECiNE DEPTH W Z \ --- \ +zEFFECTrvEDFPrM / \ o. 6 AND PARKING F: 1ZEFFEDTrvEDEPm z a 24 " HOT I 41 U LL El 1 /// PARKING TUB \OLL \CHESS BOARD ' / / Fp - ` ©F G E LL 25 AREA s u ' " t/-� \ /' / / �_ _FPM F M M M �/ ag w D Rw Aa FL R DRAT `/� /// CL P FPq_�M M M M M F w A RIM3a5 POOL CABANAS- CIL n - !7- 2u 50 \ > ,rEPFECTREDFPH TW:30.6 CABANAS-,,M: GRATE �/ \ ¢ - / DECORATIVE s � SHED N04_45'20 � _ REQ 17 I BW:27.25 OR DRAIN BW: / ' POND 178.00' Cg P-, cb 6 RIM L Q r SEIB 32 3 C COTTAGE 2 GRATE 1\7 27.2 / /,- \ t 6.5 2 `HOT PROPOSED 6.5'HIGH Q OSED 2 2 PROPOSED 2.5'H RIIPLsa pR 10US TUB TAINING WALL GRADE EL.27.5' + \ / '' q I RRAra WOODEN cb 4. �NERFI OW �- EL: 7_5 F .0 /. 1 3 umi 16'-0" 16'-0" zE FEcmEDFr M STOCKADE FENCE Z P (C1NG a I \ \ HOT TUB / 'i-','// w PROPOSED U 2 m fugL- PERVIOUS a 3 Y" �___^ \ / / / /,/ PoNDDRAR! d n Cl) OVERFLOW LL Z a RDHA-i - - /. r RM 2925 ma nr. a a PARKING HOT COTTAGES nn3ms RRI'✓vv qa 23' ,zEFFecmEDEPTH r.,. 3 1 0 I TUB ,zEFFEmrvEDEPm POOL AREA n. ? SI N 24� s s \ / / YARDS BACK NT rc e o C w y6 o RD ) PLA CO[RTS ; r o 0 o y n w w cb Z NP' Dil RADE EL.27.5' / / ' D' mo mo Y Q I P. �w � rFtcEc rvE OOR DRAIN HOT \ \ u F�1 m a L l p C' J TI Z I t oEPm TFELEV:27.2 TUB FLOOR DRAIN _ I- RDl DLP LH a o 1 / COTTAGE I D \ RATE :27.2 _ L rEFFECTWEDFPDI -� RZEFFFECINE or. W HOT O BW: 720 BW:27.25 DEPTH a` Z u) DIPLs+ LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF 3" TW: .5 RAMP- TW:30.5 RAMP DLP RAA n. RIM es p PROPOSED 2T' B -.� TUB ,rFrFFD,rvEDEPTR P8 2 J ,YEF,EDTNEDEPTH EUGEN TOMASIC&MIRELLA TOMASIC ° PARKING w » v_ _1-.., ..:."....._.. _. o LIRR nc S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-14 LOCUST LANE PROPERTY AREA O WALKWAY u. u•:{ cl cr.{ :: :nu;:{_{uu In ;ur cl. a aoa:3LlunoccL o 0 10-0" Z 12 11 LraP+ - .00aD•aoocccoo aaaoa-,u::{n rr.cTi �� GV �1�nc nnoDoaoa an\ce 3none 4 -- LINE \ O _ _L __ Ra A, 6 1T RM 31 TS 153- R 1� I 1rEFECTNEDEPTH RIMI3s \ d Y EARVARD 2° \ 21 I O I zEFFECTNEDEPTH [L PROPOSEOR O I b, b, �, I R �\_ _nl'Pww, \ LCB Pa 6 PROPOSED 9 I f HIM., PERVIOUS 17 EFFLLiWE DEPTH I - _ __ _ \9EHFFE Tt EDi '> c OVERFLOW ARBA 0.9 ,I9-0'y 29 b I PARKING cb AREA s_ RIM 31A \ , 1 +rEFFccTrvEDET>tM d SIGN ry� \\ RIM 312 \ w, PROPOSED PARKING AREA 31 b �� o 0iM TMP \ - -- L) \ b \ NEW PROPOSED DRIVEWAY \ �' LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF zE Ec vEDEPn, [32 CD I JANET L.RYAN 9' m 34 I 31 i� 0 ,� S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-13 I o 9 1 27 LCB P-2 I °P > \ a v o RU31M -- En W LLl d � 12 EFFECThE DE P,H - --- 12"-() I W / K fn fn LSd IL, � N RIM VS I. 00 1r EFFECITIEDEPM 000 4 3,} - - -�•---0--0_-_.-Q-O .._"-. ��� i��-�" �-C---O--0-0----C---G--0-0-ti--Q-01 -0-0 0-v--:•-0-- 0- -0-..- _fl____0_''9- _0_- N05" '50"IN 616.57' - PROPOSED 6.5'HIGH I ' 28 33L WOODEN \ \29 \3 N STOCKADEFENCE LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF 1 CHARLES W.WITZKE 30 ,- 3, LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-28.1 PROPOSED 7 PERVIOUS PIECES REALTY HOLDING LLC 6 b 32 OVERFLOW S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-12 5 ADDRESSED FEIS COMMENTS 05/11/2021 PROPOSED GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 0 40 80 PARKING 4 REVISED PER CLIENT'S REQUEST 02/18/2021 N05"30'56-W 3 ADDRESSED COMMENTS DATED 12/9/19 04/08/2020 51.34' ` SCALE: 1" = 40' SCALE: 1" = 40' 2 ADDRESSED DEIS COMMENTS 07/17/2019 1 REV.TO 44 ROOMS-UPDATE UTILITIES 04/11/2017 Number Revision Description Revision Date l V 1 Designed By Date Submitted Mill 0 TC 01/20/17 Drawn By Date Created MLT 08/23/16 Approved By Scale TOTAL PROPERTY AREA = 294,202 SF(6.75 ACRES) BG AS SHOWN cgenr. SITE VEGETATED/LANDSCAPE AREA - 130,223 SF THE ENCLAVES DRAINAGE AREA HOTEL ROORPOND-32,530 SF DRAINAGE AREA POOL&RECREATION AREA-42,325 SF - -. -'Tya•° 56655 ROUTE 25 DRAINAGE REQUIRED - -- n-�-•--• - ^ - - _' � � � � � � ' AGE REQUIRED �:..•.•:•.:•..•.•.•:.•..:::::.•:::•::.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•..•..•.•..•.:•.•:•.•.-.•..•.•:.•::.•:.•:.•:.•:.•:::::.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•...•..•.•..•...•..•.•.•.•:.•.•.•:, �_ a. OUT OLD NY DRAIN R UI .........:...:..:...:...•.',•,•.•.•:.•.•::::::.•:.•:.•.•.•:.•.�:.•.-.•..-.�.-.-.-.-.-::-:•:•:•:•:•:•;';•::•:::•:•::::•::•>::•:•:•:•::•:<•:•:•:•:•:•:•:-:•:-:-:-:�>:-:-:-:-:-:-:':-:•>:•>::�::�:::•::•::.�:.•...-.;.•.•.•.•.•.•.-:.-,.-.�.-.-..-.•.-.:.•"-.-.•:.•::.•.• „ , ,. < <' Q s DRAINAGE REQUIRED .................................124'6k5:�:-:-:::.:.:.:.:=:.:.:.:.:. .:�:.:�:.:.:�:. . Project: R �:`:.:},:,iii:.:.ii:•:;{:ii::::.::::::::::::::::{;;:;::{:.:=};:{.}:{:;{}: ,:y :•:•:•:•:!•:':':-:•i:•:•::-:•:•:•:•:•:•:-:•:•:';•:•:•:•:•:•:•;:•}}:•:{:•i}:•:•:•:•:-':•:-:•:.:.:.:.:.:.:•:-:•::-:-:•::•:•:-:•:-: IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1 149 SF x "/1 "x 1.0 = 3 037.25 CF - ,..:.......::,,:,.•:. ::•:::< ... :•:•:-:•:•:•: :•:•:'-''-'. ..'.',,''•'•','•' HOTEL ROOF: 26,557 SF x 2'/12"x 1.00 =4,426.16 CF 2, 3 2 0 LANDSCAPED AREA. 121,511 SF x 2112 x 0.30 - 6,075.55 CF : z F OF AREA: 2 4 SF x 3"12"x 1. 823.5 C8,712 �'.r'''c'' :�:� :�:�:�:�:� :-.• ROOF 3 9 / 00 NATURAL AREA:A 8712SFx2"12"x . / 0 30 435.6 F C z z F• 7 F x 2"12"x 1 00 96.00 CF , „ r z ••• COTTAGE ROOF: 2 3 6 S / 3 r.;- .. ,,.. ;;; " LANDSCAPE AREA. 26 882 SF x 3112 x 0.30 2,016.15 CF ::.:::..:•..•::..•.•.•.•..... :•:•:•::.:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:. .]S.._. 1."L. POND AREA. 2,997 SF x 2/12 x 1.00 - 499.33 CF TOTAL REQUIRED = 6,511.2 CF •' <�r'*':`"`,`s'„"' .r'. r.'' 'c' :L,_t��� � '� �` ' �'' ' ' ' �'� 2,667 TOTAL REQUIRED 5,876.9 CF ) .,. r CABANA ROOF: 600 SF x 2"/12"x 1.00 100.00 CF c. , '; � � ��::�:�:: :::::::•:�:�:� 26,557 -�`...}. � � � � � � � � � � � • •:� DRAINAGE PROVIDED ::::::::; ' ,: , �..,..:. �..� .z TOTAL REQUIRED 5,421.49 CF : '; 7. _ SITE E ,JI-� _i � . . , , , , , , , , . S PLAN , DRAINAGE PROVIDED ::•::•::•:::::::::::::::.: �:i ;, i i i i ice...•::.•:•::.•::: ;x�;T�-,, izs`T-,. �s z , r i i i i i i i i i i .•, DRAINAGE LEACHING POOLS DRAINAGE LEACHING POOLS _,_E•.-..".. ....::<-::.:':':'. -: , LEACHING POOLS + r .. DRAINAGE + } + + + i d i d + + + + 7 17DIA..x 12'EFFECTIVE DEPTH DLP + + ++++%.+%%++% (5)12'DIA.x 12'EFFECTIVE DEPTH DLP'S ( ) • Y - + P - - DIA. 1 'EFFECTIVE DEPTH LCB 7 x 0.9 _ _ _ _ 5 12 D A x 2 E ECT D C 10 CF/FT x 12 FT. 8 475.6 CF -(5)x 100.9 CFIFT x 12 FT. 6,054.0 CF O O •.� + + 26,882„ + } + + ---•� Protect Address: .y, _ 6,054.0 = 5 x 100.9 CF/FT x 12 FT. = 6,054 CF TO ALP V DED = '+ ,�+ +++ + +'+ + - + }'+ : + + + -���-•�-�-`�%-�;-�- TOTAL PROVIDED CF () T ROI 8,475.6 CF + + + + + + + + + k + 4 , + T =:: 56655 ROUTE 25 TOTAL PROVIDED = 6054 CF +'+ + + + +++'+ + +"++ +'+ ril �'. + + +'+ + + + + ': ' SOUTHOLD f •_r 2 97 _ ®`+ `�: + . + ' • �' • '.,''.� . '-+ + +++• � SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK DRAINAGE 2,376 • , - AREA FUTURE EVENT SPACE 6 825 SF DRAINAGE AREA TOTAL SITE PARI4NG -73,386 SF DRAINAGE AREA SWIMMING POOL FILTER AND BACKWASH �:�:�:��:�-�.. z z z ' ++r + + + + +°+ + f f+ County Tax Map Number Contract Number. DRAINAGE REQUIRED ,'' f ,-.1 1000-63-3-15 Q RED %`I DRAINAGE REQUIRED SWIMMING POOL VOLUME: 99,254.6 GALLONS / + + + + + + + z < + } f + + + + Regulatory Reference Number. e9 FILTER: 276 GALLONS PER MINUTE w + SWIMMING POOL ILTE " " _ IMPERVIOUS AREA: 73,386 SF x 2"/12*x 1.00= 12,231 CF 276 X15 MIN.-4,140 GALLONS '�'r+ '� � ' 1 �• � }+ °+' f Title Z >, r + + + + + + 1 T of Drawing: ROOF AREA: 6 640 SF x 2"112"x 1.00 = 1 106.7 CF + + + ++ } + } + + TOTAL PEQUIRED - 12,231 CF REQUIRED 553. C - :' % ''• - _• % %- % ''' + �. STAIRCASE: 185 SF x 2712"x 1.00 = 30.83 CF , , +� + + + + + TOTAL REQUIRED NAG PROVIDED Q 1,137.5 CF DRAINAGE PROVIDED DRAINAGE DRAINAGE PROVIDED :, ', �. ' / ; ,, ; ' / ; / ; ; / , ; ': ; ' , PROPOSED SITE H s ('J RA AGE LEACHING POOLS DRAINAGE LEACHING POOLS D IN " ' . r5, azzzzzzzrzzzz •r .• rr, , zzz2zz2z2z73 386 DRAINAGE LEACHING POOLS z z z z z z z z z z r z z z , .;�rT :r .. z z z z ____._._"..__•. i z , . + -' TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 1 'DIA.x 12'EFFECTIVE DEPTH LCB .. (11)12'DIA.x12'EFFECTIVEDEPTH LP O12 I , zzzzzzzzir, ,. , ,; ; zzzzzz2zzzzs » . �zzzzrz2•z2 . = 11 x 100.9 CF/FT x 12 FT. = 13 318.8 CF =(1)x 100.9 CF/FT x 12 FT. = 1,210.8 CF DRAINAGE O „ , N (1)12'DIA.x 12'EFFECTIVE DEPTH DLP TOTAL PROVIDED - 13,318.8 CF TOTAL PROVIDED 1,210.8 CF = �_ « G__ _,._ _..,,.,,,.,<.., n„ : :'. .. .........,._.•`:•:.:•.•.`::`::::...:...:.>:...::.. ::: .� �':: 294 202 SF 6.75 ACRES = 1 x 100.9 CF/FT x 12 FT. = 1,210.8 F ( ) O 0:8 C TOTAL PROVIDED 1 210.8 CF -..--. AND GRADING ING PLAN DRAINAGE AREA RESTAURANT ROOF AREA&WALKWAY- 4,563 SF IMPERVIOUS AREA DRAINAGE AREA HOTEL WALKWAY-4,350 SF DRAINAGE REQUIRED PROPOSED GRADING AREA MAP ROOF/CABANAIPOND AREA/STAIRS: 39,355 SF Drawing Number: DRAINAGE REQUIRED SITE PARKING: 73,386 SF ROOF AREA: 2,667 SF X 2"112"X 1.00 = 444.5 CF SCALE: NOT TO SCALE- HOTEL WALKWAY: 4,350 SF N IMPERVIOUS AREA: 4,350 SF x 2"/12"x 1.00 = 725 CF IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1,896SF X 2"112"X 1.00 = 316 CF POOL REC.AREA ROOF: 3,294 SF TOTAL REQUIRED = 725CF TOTAL REQUIRED = 760.5 CF POOL REC.AREA IMP.: 12,149 SFC' 2 0 0 DRAINAGE PROVIDED DRAINAGE PROVIDED C 111 I- r%F AI RESTAURANT ROOF: 2,667 SF E e RESTAURANT WALKS: 1,896 SF 2 • DRAINAGE LEACHING POOLS REV� , �Ie� TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: 137,097 SF :• Sheet of DRAINAGE LEACHING POOLS 1 �b PERVIOUS AREA 6 16 y� s (2)10'DIA.X 8'EFFECTIVE DEPTH LCB (2) 10 DIA.X 8 EFFECTIVE DEPTH DLP SEE I`.q d _(2)x 68.42 CF/FT x 8 FT. = 1,094.72 CF = 2 X 68.42 CF/FT X 8 FT. = 1,094.72 CF ^ RECREATION AREA: 26,882 SF O -g ' n � / PWGCProject Number. TOTAL PROVIDED = 1,09.72 CF D A 7 +,.•�., r� �f- t7` NATURAL AREA: 8,712 SF ..• •..•' �w TOTAL PROVIDED = 1,094.72 CF LANDSCAPE AREA: 121,511 SF Unauthorized alteration or addition z TOTAL PERVIOUS AREA: 157,105 SF to this drawing and related documents AVG 1 601 Is a violation of SedBoit 7209 " ¢o of the New YoFk Sate Etwition Law o a a ,,, .. .� ' .. ... �_. �. - .�.. . , .R-f . . . B-2 . R-3 ' , . , B-'4 . • • '.. .. • (EL.28.CPt) GROUND• SURFAC,E EL.28A't GROUNb SURFACE ' - EL.28.OIt) GROUND SURFACE (EL.30.41 GROUND SURFACE . ' .. ' It A l D B • 11 1 1 • D SRN. 1 I 1 :A'' D , , '1 I I I . 4 ORGM410 LOAM I ' I 'I ORt#AiVIC LOAM 1 1 1 '1 ,� ORGANIC LOAM I I I 1 ORGAN 0 LOAM 1 I , . . . 1 X 1'5" L i i 'i 1 1 15" I i i 1 16° 1. 8 I i 1 1 1 17" OL i 111 • •' . ' .. . DARK 9RN.-BRN. I I I 1 DARK BFtN.-BREI. i i I 1 B SAND SILT i I i BIiN. D S T 1 1 1 •B' 1R.SAN[ I r r I I I 8 ,',� LOVAM,TR.¢RAVEL; 1 1 I Z LOAM,TF#..ROOTS • all LLT LOAM "' WIL I I �6 2 SILT LRAM, ' I I I • • . • a 1 OL TS i. I I TR SAND.RO07Y3' i i 3 ROOTS OL , a• a BRIi•.SAND • • , . . . tom)�)' r a 4 "' 1 g» SRN. 811.7 ' ''' ' 2 7 �" 1 1 1 4 18" LIGHT BF1N.BAND,. 6,1 TR.nRAv(=L.SILT • . . . k .r7 k�, 19 LOAM,'I it.ROOTS. i.• '• . W , 2 i o i 3 TR GRAVEL,SILT • • ! • • • 1. . B O e .• , C Jc (S')(3b) • - • 7 • .. Strategic Environmental and Engineering Solutions lWID TR.GRAVEL; V.a • LIT LE SILT • . • ' ' '.. ' • . . . B Q , aa a (SP-SM i � • $ yo • , a � • 6 6 •ar . w 8 8 . • a 0 6 18" SAN D TR.GRAVEL; ` ` 3 1$" 11 • i ` S 6 1$" SRN.ORANQE • a • 1 . 0 ® 9 `I BAND IR GRA y $ LIGHT•gB�� SAND, • • . . .SILT • • a • Jr LIGHTBRN.-0FIANOE • a • • . GRAVEL.- • a. • • . . TR GRAVEL,SILT • a • $ . p • • g SAND,TR.QRAVBL. • a 5 SILT ♦ .• _-w _._- �. ... ti.. . 411 ($P].(3b)' • a g a.. SILT . • ` • (SP)'(3b) . s ` ♦ . , . . s TANS IG1TF BRN. • g 5 • • .. . . • 630 Johnson Avenue. . Suite 7 SP • 7' , OFtANC3E SAND r 1$» • 4 1�. • . : i 0 4 9 19 TR,NAVEL,SILT " 4 $ ! , •'a a . . • Bohemia . NY. 11716-2618 r g ' • Phone: (631) 589-6353 . Fax: (631) 589-8705 ••, . (8P](8b) • s • aa • ass g E-mail: INFO@PWGROSSER.COM 4 • a • $6 • LIGHT BRN.SAND, 000 B LJGHT SRN.SAND, + ! 5 LIGHT SRN.SAND. a . ' a • a . • B 1 s" Tit GRAVEL,SILT• s o • i 19 TR GRAVEL;SILT s r a -.6' 4 18" TR GRAVEL,SILT • • • • • . • ' (SP)(3b) CONSULTANTS . 10 a • • 10 7 (SP)( ] • ` • 10 rJ (SP)(.), • ` • 10 a a ! B' • . 4 . : 6 4 6118 • i • 8 -7 • ; r 18 41$" ' _ .. i , a 0 419" . * 0 . . . • , ; • s • .. aar 5 aa • a'0a , . . rr $ a • 9 • a • 5 s.s ` 6 aa • . • . . , • i a ! • i:a :: i a: 0 raa aha aaa . a a . i a • a • •a • , .. . . . a r . ia • . . , • a • •a • a a • a , a a a . . TANUGHT SRN. • • a • • • • • • •♦ rw0IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIs , is SMM TR GRAVEL, a s a tI� r : • 1a TAN-LIGKT BRN: • : • 1. r : « ::.: . (SP)(3b) •f r 8 7 s ` ♦ g » •TR GRAVEL,SILT y a 5 s• • '; ' SAND, . 5 a• a Y ..,- ',, IS fi 20 . 7 18" 7 MP)(3b) g* :`: - TA 1 L1QI fr SRN. • 19 • 1 YAN-UG T BRN. s . • • r • • • SAND • • ." �' • r SAND a • • +• a B a • a ;'r' ':rj ;'y"..'11%.; :°. ,a. : , '+ ::i.•,.• t a • • TR RAVEL 81 • lr ., ;AI:ty�}. .t _ r:E:. ; ��j` „ ., .:. • ' ♦• • TA.GRAVEL.SILT s" • s•..r (�]( ) r s a ;•r: I.:,• , x',:k9 F rF:.`' .;7 , - ,._., . . . . '• •a r' • a.a to . . • a • .1.•..5.. �!nti,' �-�."'..., ti..:.., .... : 2 ,.,rr•.l , 20 .'�(} •a • C - a • • 20 a • a ; a` • •': ..,• " �•': iyi '' '• ,•y,;' fh •I' , •�', ) ' ' , or 818 : 719" 1$ " ` �.-'••, /' '`'`.t� --;,s�' W. ,..; a • 7 a • B a • •• . _„-- .r- I. .1 f , ate • r�• a - 8 a : 0 ,� ..ar . . :-r- � Y.. , . f. •,. I•., 2' �, . • . . . • ' ' •a • a.• • ' . a• a x - . . • , a a • a a r a .. ^e � :-i: . r ra . • • • • ... _ I . . . ! j • • . • • • ! J • i.• '�",,. >,;1,�,' Lew' ' ,1 ..6 ,/460 :� .y-'• . •.. • i• . s• • • • • 1• . BRN.8AND f.. • • a _ :, �►, .:} i :;..;:. . .. ... . . . •, . • • • • LIQHT SRN.SAND, «. .i ;`'., s' ..:".n'' TR.GNIVPL.,SILT s i26 r `'a LITTLE GRAVEL, a ` . a` ! •� ., ,,l' r°' ., ,r ' p:` . • SP ! .T . r '.TF1.SILT , •.a •a'.a1. y:'. :.: '�r '"� :; . . UNIFIED. SOIL .CLASSI FICATIOiN' ' , . 260. r `.• (S� ] • • • r `�_, �. •w "... •: ad., ,^i�yywr)• 4,:. :,;.:. . . i 6 i Kt. :...+ '' . �, •8011.0ROUP$•' i YPI • .. 8 -'�& g ,1�1e �r _ ' ; ..� ' ::r. ... CAL E& ID.SOIL SYM3 ES . 1$" i w IiJ �1 �.D. a "' R• a r::r.•'ra',. ;:;:r:•' . 'o . . t s 8 a. .II. • 19, . ,.,+ ,;..• •vi: a`: J! ,,• . i'::.. err.. Y. :r • 7 i • �� ♦ • • • S . . y� x i • •' • :.I,' :� 18RU1tl' BfDROCk . ♦• :. :qa:,.,.. ^r..g..It• ..1 ,.r,.:. t tic ' ' END OF BORING 2 a END OF BORiN(3 ZT-0' D W.T. ;�g•. ':.r k Y Tor END ''OF BORIN 27'-0" •t• • .,: .� +SI. ::,: GW VVlB.1-t�TfilAdEtQ 1.8 j a r�.-1r. .. . . s 1. ;,; ,•' "w 2 CaRgVB .DRAVEL w0t MIXTURES;LiT-LLE OR f�10 Y a • a: r•. i I•• .r :rB. > .:. 11! 1 . . QP r IF I 1 ftE C IF PION --v�, •. .;:: . . . 88 C C L A'8.S i F I G A T I O N P8B CI.ASB IOAT ON w 8B LAS$ a. 1C ;.• _ :,. LR7LE OR T+tO FINES i . . POO .. . .• 1 AL `,;;: ; w.l: . GM SiLn►cmairEi ,GrivEE:saws-ii3lLT MDCIUREe' A a • a 'w• r':hj, .,. ' r.r : J ;Y': r;. •..---•,, IIMrMU . . HT.B r;•K;.. ';:.•.,e. :� :.., :..: exf CSC CLAYEY GFKAVFJ.L",GRAVEL.-SAND-CLAY MDLTFJRE REVIEWED .��Fap . _ , .. ,. LIQ RN.-SRN. a a ;..I,f:1•I.,.?!: •.k:i S4. ... •! •fb ,�:••. •.wi!. +,.` 'K.. '� ` �' ED ��� �aB B-V. .W�.,;RI 1 GRi♦A�Fr,. •�. :... i . 1 1 .i.' ,iP Fw..,d. ;,wp....+w w,t l • B� B-7. 3 811. i ' ,,•': , 7 °"' c�'l:°i:: ::_„,; " ' SVII A!VE].I_GRu>m 81WD8,C,IZ�ivELLY ISANDB,Lrm,E Oit 40 FINES P SEE DECISION �y ' . .. 4 » T • • .;".,l•• •,r' :' •r.,:.. �...,. .,w.. .,^.�a.r�;:• q l... i' _ W.V �.JI®N ��r �7 Q • :A;. ;•.%� �^.`•i;' ,. ;� :;• 1 ;;i SP POORLY GRAD®SJWDB O!�GRAVELLY BAND$ LITIT.E OR NO FINES • ,(EL..3CI.01I GROUFID' SU ACrI=. . (EL.29A�t GROUND'SURFACE ,.•" :wM ( r, !i'i • DATED /� EL.$2.4't {3ROUND $URfACE i• :"'` „:, .,. i,• , 1' . r� �. 1 r! �*" I '�' • • '!, 2 s.F', )y:�l....n CIS.' •.• •'•�•�., , DARK SRN: , _ r.J L-• 1 I 1 1 1 a ' 1 ,. ,i ^ '+: 4 SNI SILTY SANC18,SMR3-81L1.1411xTIJRI , . . 1 lCLOAM III 1 LOAM,' 1 rl,.:h. s.l:: t I 1 1 1'IVi,,,i�F. :SFr" •% -�• •,:' •r. ..�' ': 1 . ORG k+ r' e, 1:'- Mme' I• I I' ■ 1 1 i 1 1 1I • ♦ 'y� • . .y,t .,�...:.. ',:�.,.... .L".i.i'• 1. O 1 4 1'S 1 4 I I N I M I ♦ r i,; :.. ' �;' SC' C�LAYE'Y SM61B,BAND'-6L171Y.MIn I UREB a . t t 1 Iii I '1 !i' I .h ,rn. u}: +S . I. . ► i I s.. 1�r yn� 7: �-Ty RN.' . � i BRlV B ! I I 81tT I I I I I I • r x:.; r o-. ',' - . 1 I r,�`i. •" $ 2 ML� TS.. SLIC1#ii PLA811CrTY SILT LC M, r 1' I SANDY 811.'7 I r I • ..�,... ! 'Mai, M TNORQANIO•BIL VERY FH IE BAi+�B 43LAYFY BFLit3, ' 1 TR SAND,ROOM• I I '_ TR BAND I 1 I • 1. - -_ . 'I; I 1 I I 2• I I 1 I3 TR.ROOTS : a a * 'A. ,,, s•-r, 1.. CCL INORQr4PtICiCLAYSOF'LOWTOREDII CITY, GRAVELLY 'I • 3 ' •(�)(B) I I• . .. s s ti•:.: a -_w': , }, ) PLAs- Y CLAYS 2 3 15 • • '�' 1T ' » ' • • • 38 • ` • .I . ;,; ,"'r1 . _,. ,: a. Y. ` eaNDYc 8d1YCLAYB ., • BFiN:LJ HT HRN. • 2 16 a r • • a i F.,,;.iz r &�1 „ y`� ;.i QI ' ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SL7Y 7 • • 81U1D TR,GRAVEL • BIRN. CLAYS LOW PLASTICiT Y J I r . s • 4 BAND. •• r '' r{ `` :y, -C� k:. 7 • s 6 SILT t • . . •' LT111!GRAVEL, • �' :.I 1!" _`• .' f INE DY OR 6 . r • { • • ` r a 5 TR, a y"'t''' a' r k»E' r lir:: MH SILTY SOI iI.'F1 ASiIC 81LT8 5 II' LIGHT ORN.-ORANGE s • a SP . a 7 r r 11 1 a" SILT • • ;, '+ - 6 • " a r LIQH1`SRN.BAND, • {$P){3b) ' ♦ ` • . �+,';:: CH INOROuANIt;CLAYS OF HIGH PLA&TIiCiiY,FAT CLAYS 4 6 $ANL),TR GRAVEL•. a'• r .3 8 1$ • 7 " T R.GRAVEL•SILT r. - a ''; 3 3 18 • 1$ ` 5 ' r ` • i ; r ;;_; '"M ' ADDRESSED COMMENTS DATED 12/9!19 04/08/2020 SILT r ! • , • S $ (SP)I . ` • • ..•' 11. r,,T __- - -- -� :::'Z. ; .'" ICC 2 {9P](3�) • • EDIUM TOM ADDRESSED DEI a • a a.a • I:, - :;.,..," OH ORiIAII I AYS OF1tl CC1F1 PLABtICTiY,ORGANIC SILTS S COMMENTS 07/17/2019 k 1 REV.TO 44 ROOMS-UPDATE • 40 * • S 4+ $ r- s • • ;I' W'��ice. , • , .. j UTILITIES 04/11/2017 • • • • • . . • ,:: '::i <� .. :;E:' I. 1��•yt PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY • 7 • • • ;, �'"{ :. - ''e Pt ORGANIC,BOILS hVumber RevisionDescriptionRevision Date . . 0 i L efr bRNr ORAI • +.+k:::_ yl' i:•C::' .. . BAWD TR GRAVEL a ! « ■ a $ ; " ;. :!.';':: ,ate S. . . 4 . r r .0 • .1I.;,.. .. -M' B' • -.... ,.,' ''is.y�.l;i• . a • ,. , ,; .,.: ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARIN.0 PRESSURES N.Y.C.BLD(3.CODE TAB . • : '.q:: ': ;, .A . :. I...j.. 1 LE 10041.1 • a ' . : • y;• :..;... r ::qy-:: :, ,y: . . Designed By SILT • ! ";,;:r 4.''•', ' Date Submitted • • • • r •.•I:itur'l "`',•i;a •%I-,I 1.6:' G MiWMUM ALLOWABLE a {SP)(8b) , •• . . . r '. ''ik,,. x.... . CLASS OF MATERIAL-" Mwx M Auowa+Bl.E TC I. . $ a . • a a • ,, ~:;' RJ ..!-.;. •u.,.q,:r:i`t., r:::; 01/20/17 • • " • ''w"'l'.::•-•''4! r F -'':"'�'s' g - ,� Iwd * FOUNDATION FOUNDATION Drawn . -�• :� . '''j^,",,• _..' :.,', '•�R•.. '!.:' r,,.. .p (No41r Y Date Created . a .' f 0 • • • i •'ii�.., .•:.S'• ,�'�a ,,t•' ::i� #fi:�lrt:'•`,=,i• ',•;,'?�, .:• ,' .uwi,.�.�' , • • • • a a ;,. :;. „ :h�: �Y'<G:.,:,,,, 1.ae6Fl�cx(NOT®B s•m TC\LT 08/23/16 ',.,ji.::: . ,, .II: • • ., ;rr.`�cX".e.. i.. .=='I►•. I, ;;., +t, A•. ,.•r D APIProvedBY Scale a • •' . . . .;•;;, ::: ` 1a MAI SOM ROCK- SC H 60 roe 19. }7 !':,... Iti`.,.;, �.• ,•sl{ �:;R.;. :t .',' . aNess,osrASAffiE, FST .. b, . ♦ �; . • a M a .a , i y,•.. " �:4•I Id MEDIUM F1ARD = G AS SHO . • S r : 12 S 2 r :s.: 7:`r,-, n r ROCK-AAARBLE,a1FBlpEiVTIN,E 40 ,a B VVN • .a 10 • • ■ (] • x: ,:.;: <;,..A.::;N,1i:�;.4. 't : EFtAiE, 20 gi,ent 0 r • 'r;1.1 ti:`.' a, n" a,1s. n,,,.,1..., 1. 1,015 . . r 0 •. • ;;.:^: ti...,...: ,. „L: ,, 1a INTS3tItEDNTE ROCK- SAJVDBTONE '.. Fr. „>,,: I,� , ... 7d SM ROCK-VRAT"EREDROCK 8 Tab . • t • ;:. ,' .' ':I- :1 :i•• .j .i.: .s b r t ,•. . ,,.•., 'LC• ::a :.., . a «. . . 6 • ,':�' ':l I'u;. .rya- x IuworaRAveLr,aflRAvL q►y * THE ENCLAVES • • g •• a . '' '• "'k, .a�'� I� : <:. r..,, D!l4�1 .o�P a4,a•d� 10 7 F . . 6 ,. . a :. ~.; . :,::.� : •r-'-- W �.: ; 2b MEDIUM b 56655 ROUTE 25 1.7 16 ,.w +:;:•,..•••: •,::. '•; 1.111..,• , .a7a 4 �� • • • a • a'',. IMA -1rc, r�x::^:,::iY',..,: r;F.ry:a;r:r~.t,!.ai.... b ORANUAJiR80a8 AM,bYY.bF'.aM4S ar,• .. ..........r a a •i • 4 S a a x .4. "` 1••.: : ,_: (©G ec101oT1�4,a s M1 S O . a - -r..:;7(.-,... ., E. : Ala•DEMISE b 5Ta UTHOLD, NY .' 7 a • • • r4�;L..a ... :. ':.. ,Cs i' ,i. J,•:2 a.: ,.: x..•:'•n.:... . . • S • . ::a.r:a'o :..,: :r e::.., ." .n . ,.t.E.:; .:>;+.:E `;i r:s.. �t ' ab IUM a . •2107 Project ,.,. �,'%' :.':.,.,&.:::: aaa Sar aaa .. ., .. . . � :.'•�'.' • '•< ... : .. a a 4,a�ald ,w * • • • 0 SRN.BAND, r a ! BORINGS LOCATION PLAN 4b STIF40 HARD F .s 07 i a .' 4 a • ' s •'a TR.GRAVEL;SILT. •a • - 40 MEOW 2 102 • • a • a• ♦ • a (SP]{3b) •, r' 0 2a' 76' 1B6' 14LE: NTS ,ao� s ssrb•sarreol�aoalmaatrgparoa4rs.nerj* a SITE PLAN Ia. •: . ; a : : tJ 19 0• 0 . , �"-""""!� as MEDIUM 1.6 144• -..... . 18 1S " a a ,. • 4 a 0 4, . a i • . 8 a•a.0 $ : a • W 100' ' 'DRAWING SCALE:1 1'OQ'±' a roA1oRAit�i`AReo w�dyeoJJLZW0AM% . SEE IW44.1 * SEE1eII)CII r • • `3 •, a 4.•.9 5 a,'+ • . , r • • . . , , . . 7.OD11TF1O end UNCONfFtla. MUS dM!1334=0111ea1. * 1 1 • a r 2� aAk UGHiT SRN. • 7 1 • 5 • a . . *FRrMTO SeC41011'I 10642 OR NOTES FOU MW TABLE 1564.1 IN N.Y.C.WLDNO P'ODE FOR ADOTiOPW.NFOiWNION Project Address: a Ti � r . . BTANDAR!] ttoNtEsrr<ASTMID4a66 56655 ROUTE 25 . 1 T • • • •• • 6 1$ TAN-F.IGHTI3RN. • • 1 SAND.... . $ •a s 6 SAND, ♦ ' • SAW, a a • ` • • COF.aP�AC f1C�I FiLIATED'r0 BF�ODIN BL01M81FOOT TR G,RAVF9L,�.T • a TFiL GRAVEL,SILT . a a a 7 TR.GRAVEL,'SILT' • •!. ( )i ) •• • P • r . a « . SAND lf•T ouv irePoora,4aa►IAti4ueR.4o�>ww SOUTHOLD •. t8 )( ) (r ( ). . r t me La1TO N1D Marr IlM7FM11/� reAtbor Is- IN(M1007p1,1I0MxDRaRO . ' SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK . • so • a a ONINAWOOLWOOMORAl SHMW' . .. •a • a • • r • • '• 11MS1lM ,07010 1�IINe 4701 lirrrrtrw IMCIIalY1111TIrgo 7tsfxrAw r a r •♦ • , a♦ • a • • . ' cow THAN N 1714 OIIeAymmW 17010 C 111 rr . r. a r• • . • . r County Tax Map Number. Contract Number. NOTES . ' .. a • . .s 14 41 : , ' . . . , . . .. CA� � PVN 1RtaravA . . , °Q SAIi INrDsa. 1000-63-3-15 41 20 , . • • ,• -11=aalrMlarrrrMll -ae11a><NLNN1i1 Regulatory Reference Number; a . ,11 i. • Mah•1 1A R• . IMM:HCoto F�f•Oa(prgT0114NOAUR ' r r s a .'6 . - •�,a 1. SOIL DESCRIPTIONS A�tE BY VISUAL EXAMINATIOM OF SOiL SAMPLER.RE:CDIdERED DURING DRILLING CSPERATIONB.• NAfil•ttMlOFit,laR - aio P•�U•I•DMVMOdIa NrnY4ATM►ctxr TItl1e of Drawing: ; (3 0 9 r +,. • B • • • END OF OMNG1T-W NAKAMI1PALL DO10M - ,-So: WOR WARMFRoO a�-•o NffopHAMMM .*w I 8 �'- 20 *. a i . . 6 • • 0 7 • s' • , ' 2. sck DESCRIPTIONS ARE IN ACCORD WITH UNIFIED SOIL CLA851FICAnck SYSTEM. .. . 11-MUM MOFNLMBMM DrAUJUONF.irromwwmaeaw.vemaroRieaWMON NDMMMW-nmmmm 1.,M nptpu ft • 4.`a a 8 1 a ` • r • Nq 11Arimmormmmwaaai�171ra0g1�QalM�lf1[II.Mooft1¢uwwTo1NEi�M0uNr0!'91VMPMDroR" .. ROOT.THI1�•amff l r a, • SS RE CLABSIFiCATION ORIILaO}AIffPARrOr,Hllt�pgC►WY.OOMilIMNJWACt�'rANC{OFTaIIYTAT10NOrWIK1iM'.fTl•IrWAtaCtTAa.RTIi01iiT. B O RI G P LA� $ • , i • ♦ , . + • .6 • . . .• 3. GROUND WIATER TABL:IE WiAt3 MFJISLlRED INSIDE THE DRILL SIN 'HE COMPLETION-OF EACH BOREHOLE. . . . wMrM0rR1IOIttiM101wIC•OMualror7NR94vmrmwvmflwwUNW matrlw:+e W§ff dTMDMCrF=WI:v+EAWO"VRIED % 0 . �a • ! . • o • •. • , I • YoRTtMIMI'ORraM1®ONrmumRA'rI0NO�1Wl1RY11"IeTmn'i -F CIF"Aff&" r.IFT1*�U•IfyM=A'WV" cq . •a a • .. r a •' -LONA110NIWLV$L 1710►'FMIONNIOi•MWIOOOIM'MKL MWM720 M. DLMANOMMUNI OCJ41R mrmAC0nm 9 ..: . : • : : 4. SOIL 8TRA71FICA710NS ARE ACCURATE TO WITHfI�I TWO FEET VERTICALLY. . :' , , : uAM1lMirrtanflrunarrrsa IrroIMlMa1a ANroNl ouMfr 1�1*11e i1�aMlfllw 1M11 s °° �' °"°"�" AND BORING LOGS rMMMONI Or,W*MMTN1 MMff MOR MRIOYMTA111aoRT11WIb,P11®MIRrm. • + • • 1. • : a . . 6. SOIL SAMPLES WERE 09TAINED USING A CENTRA.MINE EQUIPMENT(CME),AUTOMATIC TiRIP HAMMER. • ' . ` r • .ANDREW V.CAgBERTONE aASSOCLAI -,S,ARCHITEQTB,•PC' o •', • • '' �'a'0 • s • • B. SOiL tEST•IbORiNG�GR'OUND SURFACE ELEVATIONS'SHOWN AIRE REFERENCED.TO TOPOGRAPHICAL$URVEY- . " 62 E11'aI,STREU, ' { • ' ` a.a • . 0., . . ' 9 a r •• . PROVIDED BY,ANDREW v.GUAMSERTONE ASSOCIATES&ARCHITECTS. . • . . ' • • . . HUNTiNGTON,NEW 117+13 , ' . : - 5 6 :7 7 20 . . ' •.� : 9 $ 20 •, r 7 n>» 0 a : . ' . . . . . . . IqM. 11I�, M � :, `. • •. �' V a • + 9.. ..1�� Number. c r • I a r ILO VM..Mm`7�' Drawing . END OF 8ORING2T-Q' END, OF BORiNG27'-0" END OF BORINn27r4r - . .. . 37M ME BRICK ROAD • SWOII NI_W YORK 111783•• 61S 221-2838 0 . . 2 0 1 `� 'r u. NSG SB CLABSIFICAT(0N H! $B OLISSIFICNnON. I ' . �- i . I SB! . . L A F3 s3 I F I c . T.o N . . . o .. • ' SUBSURFACE INVEEMATION ® I . . I I c; . . PROPOSED 2 STORY.HOTEL ' I I . . (�; . . . • • . . , • • . • . . • ROUTE 2, 5 > . . .' . •: SOUTHOLD NEW YORK : Sheet of g . . . . . 0114414;= I . . 1 . . IIII , , ,: _ . . . , 1`►ter IW W&M III owl: ""A "` DEcEtNBER 27,20101 °""'"rt7 16 leL805.T CF(EC1�Imo' s PWGC Project Number: 9 LL Z 1BLOM$ 1BL�C16,7 DEC.I of iFBr 1 ,.; 1 f �..�... _ _...v .. .. -- -- w 11 !i . • ""` . . • , , ed n or addition AVG 1601 2 2 !; . ' . ' .. m drawing an related o .mss,... -� ... ,_,. ... .. .. . •� :. . ,,`ffl-. Unauthorized Iters Un this d re Is a violation of Section i of the New York State Education taw0 1- a � a .?,-w � i:. LU U_ < CV 0 a - _ TOWN HARBOR Cr - - - LANE OU > o w o o 0 LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF rn LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF 1­- r=.I z VALERIE M.SCOPAZ ' o N S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-16 _ ANTHONY FORGIONE LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF z 1- WOOD POSTS � VINCENT DOLOMITE&ILEANA DOLOMITE 0 Z C) WITH NETTING LINE OF EXISTING EXISTING 1 STORY FRAME S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-17.3 z o �; :, -; DRIVEWAY TO BE S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-17.4 g _ REMOVED SHEDTORAT BE RENOVATEDINTO INCORPORATED INTO MAIN m` Z RELOCATE EXISTING, STRUCTURE ri 27_ s l Q \ ( STORYFRAME Strategic Environmental and Engineering Solutions �\ GARAGE TO REMAIN 26 l S _ �_ _ �,� '�■ n.� ��. �� ) : 'SF .� - „ -- �f--■--;� _ 310.00' � S07°44'40"E28 32 622.78 28 2g _ / F ir c 30 S07°38'10"E SIGN SF SF SF S ` �F SF SFG WELL 777 " s NEW PROPOSED ■ .■..o..,..'...,..,.._......■.a._,.......®... � - ,.V. - .NP'"■- ■ DRIVEWAY I RELOCATED AS - LO IRRIGATI WE � - . , LL CV o 630 Johnson Avenue. . Suite 7 o¢ ? Bohemia . NY. 11716-2618 Phone: 631 589-6353. Fax: 63 589-8705 EXISTING TO BE I E-mail: INFO^PWGROSSER)COM i ,j, !' REMOVED r 2 Z V f/) } j �� \ / / /• /// ' /// j / 7 EXISTING TO 2 STORY 2 y- cb - STRUCTURE TO REMAIN SIGN -- _ OPROPOSEDI �b CONSULTANTS / 6.5 ARB GE RESTAURANT 28 AREA 0 FF:27.5 X �i L w 1 Z / / j�•j / , i /---j- / -� FUTURE I-STORY \ 75' o % '/ " d 0 ols s o� / / / ' EVENT SPACE I o p 4 I x \O a / / /j FF/EL.. 7.0' FF.EL.32.0' W I _ ---- / _.... o - i I �POSEDA ION TO I 50' \ o 29 / / E TIN Z Z 1 pd \ j j i/j// �i/• /%, / , - %i ! i a t L � /slate AL ! ? " a0 1 x O I / LA SCULPTURE sl J EM B - 25, . n:. x d Z Z SIGN ' .i i ,• � / •' i � ' 'oUr.::rroaa � scan o., oo�onoc �"n000� at r 1, m i , i / ,' �iR N� EXISTING TO E m P 0 0 (n Q ,• ." ,i ,•'' i LAWN n R OVED T3 O � 5O' 1X \ j GARDEN % ti": - T m it 75' i °. - HU27 I I o to \ GRADE EL 30.5 I u I I a I e NEW PROPOSED DRIVEWAY - w AND PARKIN z z Z a J Q COTTAGE 1 LL LL PROPOSED TUB \ I / '1 \ PARKING CHESS BOARD U I'- �, AREA , _ 1 0 � POOL CABANAS -o- ° -fl = 6 S��- A s w 17 �- I X11 30.5 '1W:30.5 _ a - 1) CORATIVE a HED N04 ply x cb O B 27.25 BW:27.F '/ P D b? ��'20 y� ° p`i,+ 3 32 a I I - 0 � COTTAGE 2 H i4 VA" a 2 2 S 2. THOTUB PROPOSED 2.5'H \ ' '// It AINING WALL / I cb w GRADE EL.27.5' +E�_ 7 5 \ /i FF E.32 < HOT , !u�i \ z J TUB I w QC LL Ne EL ILL U G 3 (7 / �<C a COTTAGE 3 o HOT o TUB ' \ POOL ARFA C� � k,-....�.,.... � \) PLA COM 'i / i ;6 Q � � W I�I I RADE EL.27.5' HOT i / I H I a m cb IUD at C07TAGE4 BW: 7.20 BW:30.56 p EUGEN TOMASIC&MIRELLA TOMASIC ISI LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF TW: .5 RAMP- TW:30.5 l 28 it _ HOT R1oPROPOSED TUB PARKING - LIRR AREA Ln/v\an S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-14 LOCUST LANE PROPERTY t, -� WALKWAY \ :.���� .ao�a �Qaa�cccco�a �^ g �� �VYAt:_ JU:UU000UUUUUOU❑UUUUU ° LINE Z \ ,2 - _ 4 r a 2t i �, � � � i r ARE \ I I�I \ r \ p \ 4, o SIGN \ w PROPOSED PARKING AREA 131 (32 o N �; LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF �' ; \ NEW PROPOSED DRIVEWAY I�, JANET L. RYAN _____ cn i ! ° 27ZBA S.C.T.M. N0. 1000-63-03-13 FINAL MAP 6 ------ i 0 REVIE'r��E0 �.�►' -�- - is ° s �s SEE - -0� DEC�SiOW �s 50"W 616.57' 40 -0 DATED33 I c� o LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF 9 N S CHARLES LES W.WITZKE / 30 � � r� 3, LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF S.C.T.M. , NO. 1000-63-03-28.1 PILLES REALTY HOLDING LLC 6 32 S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-12 5 4 ADDRESSED FEIS COMMENTS 05/11/2021 N05°30'56"W 3 ADDRESSED COMMENTS DATED 12/9/19 04/08/2020 ESSED DEIS MMENTS 107/17/2019 51.34' \ 1 REV..T O 44 ROOMS-UO DATE UTILITIES 04/11/2017 33 NumhFf Revision Description Revision Date Designed By Date Submitted EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN Drawn By TC Date Created 01/20/17 TC�L,T 08/23/16 Approved By Scale SCALE: 1" = 40' BG AS SHOWN 0 40 80 ��.. .. hent. 1 '' ' . .' ' ' ,:� THE ENCLAVES I F=9 ��._..�. .._ �w ' 56655 ROUTE 25 SCALE: 1" = 40' Sediment and Erosion Control Notes a r: SOUTHOLD, NY Project: 1. THE PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ADDITIONAL EROSION Proposed Notes CONTROLS MAY BE NECESSARY, BASED UPON FIELD CONDITIONS THAT MAY DEVELOP AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE Protection Elements SITE PLAN OWNER OR DESIGNATED OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. THE FOLLOWING GENERAL CONDITIONS SHALL BE OBSERVED. - - - - - - - STRAW BALES EROSION CONTROL A. ANY EXISTING VEGETATION NOT SCHEDULED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE ' PROTECTED AND REMAIN UNDISTURBED. B. CLEARING AND GRADING SHALL BE SCHEDULED SO AS TO MINIMIZE THE SIZE Project Address: Sediment and Erosion Control Grading OF EXPOSED AREAS AND THE LENGTH OF TIME THAT AREAS ARE EXPOSED: SF SILT FENCE 56655 ROUTE 25 C. THE LENGTH AND STEEPNESS OF CLEARED SLOPES SHALL BE MINIMIZED TO --- - - ----- - REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITIES AND QUANTITIES. SOUTHOLD 1. ALL 1:2 & 1:3 SLOPE AREAS WILL BE PROTECTED AGAINST EROSION DURING D. RUNOFF SHALL BE DIVERTED AWAY FROM CLEARED SLOPES. SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK E. SEDIMENT SHALL BE TRAPPED ON THE SITE. I III CONSTRUCTION AND PERMANENT GROUND COVER SHALL BE SUCH THAT FILTER FABRIC DROP INLET PROTECTION EROSION WILL BE PREVENTED. NECESSARY MEASURES SHALL INCLUDE, BUT SPECIFIC METHODS AND MATERIALS EMPLOYED IN THE INSTALLATION AND County Tax Map Number. Contract Number. NOT BE LIMITED TO, HAY BALES, AND SILT FENCE, AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED 1000-63-3-15 FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AS WELL AS FOLLOWING THE MAINTENANCE OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL CONFORM TO THE "NEW Regulatory Reference Number. COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION UNTIL SUCH 11ME THAT THE PROPOSED YORK STATE STANDARD AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT PLANTINGS HAVE BECOME ACCLIMATED/ESTABLISHED. CONTROL, LATEST EDITION". Title of Drawing: 2. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN - SHOWN WITH LIMIT OF TREE CANOPY- 2. SEDIMENT BARRIERS (SILT FENCE, HAY BALES OR APPROVED EQUAL) SHALL BE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TREE PROTECTION FOR ALL EXISTING TREES TO INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING WORK ALONG THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LANDGRADING AREAS SEDIMENT AN REMAIN PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, GRADING, CLEARING OR GRUBBING. TREE AND SHOULD BE MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE WORK. NO SEDIMENT PROTECTION SHALL USED TO LIMIT ROOT DISTURBANCE PER DETAILS SHOWN ON FROM THE SITE SHALL BE PERMITTED TO WASH ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES, """`_ SHEET C-400. WETLANDS OR ROADS. 3. ALL DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENT BUILDUP THROUGH EROSION CONTROL . THE USE OF SEDIMENT BARRIERS, SEDIMENT TRAPS, ETC., AS REQUIRED. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PLAN L 4. PROPER MAINTENANCE OF EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURES IS TO BE f-1 PERFORMED BY PERIODIC INSPEC11ON AND AFTER HEAVY OR PROLONGED STORMS. MAINTENANCE MEASURES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, CLEANING OF SEDIMENT BASINS OR TRAPS, CLEANING OR REPAIR OF SEDIMENT BARRIERS, CLEANING AND REPAIR OF BERMS AND DIVERSIONS AND CLEANING Drawing Number. o AND REPAIR OF INLET PROTECTION. U h 5. APPROPRIATE MEANS SHALL BE USED TO CONTROL DUST DURING DUST CONTROL CONSTRUCTION. ' 6. A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO PREVENT SOIL AND LOOSE DEBRIS FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO LOCAL ROADS. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THE SITE IS Sheet of q PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. S 16 CURB DROP INLET PROTECTION PWGC Project Number. gw Unauthorized alteration or addition = to this drawing and related documents AVG 1601 Is a violation of Section 7209 0 of the New York State Educalbn Law L o 3 a a SYMBOL SYMBOL SYMBOL SAND BAG OR SYMBOL FLOW 2"X4"WOOD FRAME I I II OF 2"X4" UM LENGTH ALTERNATE WEIGHT \� AL I 4"VERTICAL FACE 1.5'MAX. •� �i .� STAKE 2"2"S ONIE -� p,•p•p p,'o -• FABRIC BEDDING DETAIL \\\ FILTER CLOTH 2"x 4"SPACER NOT TO SCALE �.G �- WIRE MESH 3'MIN. DRAINAGE AREA NO MORE THAN 1/4 ACRE PER 100 FEET OF STRAW 11= p• ,p •p p BALE DIKE FOR SLOPES LESS THAN 25%. ' o p•p• p INLET TO ,- ~ �tI' I�-lil ;t PIPE Strategic Environmental and Engineering Solutions �IJ= lITI- =a 7 6'MAXIMUM SPACING ANGLE FIRST STAKE TOWARDS ,1' DITCH OR DIVERSION TO na. / OF 2"X4"SPACERS PREVIOUSLY LAID BALE. f ++ +� �-DIVERT SURFACE FLOW m �_/ s DROP INLETAWIfth FLOW ,MM a� aurr .rira a... WITH GATE BURIED FABRIC L „�JL ,,, s AL A. i BENCH GRADE 2-3% FRAME 4m BOUND BALES PLACED r- 2"X q» � D ® • ® {" 40M ,W,. ANCHORS ON CONTOUR. "W` mur " ' "�" '�` HRA 630 Johnson Avenue. . Suite 7 ---�� arra ar A i ,o JL .a JL yr = A. y ar ' _ DIST. 2 RE-BARS,STEEL PICKETS I �ur2. + + .rm� +�� + *141k - STONE-� \ Bohemia . NY. 11716-2618 (� I ` r MIN. �"`'° % Phone: (631) 589-6353 a Fax: (631) 589-8705 �IIh�l11 ISI `' III I'°RF,< 1 y �` V I I I OR 2"X2"STAKES PLACED 00 14111 R ^ �� - E-mail: INFO@PWGROSSER.COM DRIVE STAKES FLUSH WITH ZIN GROUND. Y I�alll lI h III 1'MIN. I� wit � t � GATHER EXCESS %:�-• " TOP OF BALE. hI „t AT CORNERS ( I I I I CLOTH '� X 4" ANCHORING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE II 1;W Y 1 y�� I+rk�` �� MESH SPACER CONSULTANTS 6'MIN. x �III�t arra' CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 2"x4"WEIR CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS ym�llllnrn CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS X Y(MAX) 1.FILTER FABRIC SHALL HAVE AN EOS OF 40-85.BURLAP MAY - 1.BALES SHALL BE PLACED AT THE TOE OF A SLOPE OR ON THE CONTOUR AND IN A BE USED FOR SHORT TERM APPLICATIONS. ROW WITH ENDS TIGHTLY ABUTTING THE ADJACENT BALES. 2 20' 2.CUT FABRIC FROM A CONTINUOUS ROLL TO ELIMINATE JOINTS.IF 1.FILTER FABRIC SHALL HAVE AN EOS OF 40-85. 3 30' JOINTS ARE NEEDED THEY WILL BE OVERLAPPED TO THE NEXT STAKE. 2.WOODEN FRAME SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF 2"x 4"CONSTRUCTION 2.EACH BALE SHALL BE EMBEDDED IN THE SOIL A MINIMUM OF(4)INCHES,AND 4 40' GRADE LUMBER. PLACED SO THE BINDINGS ARE HORIZONTAL. 3.STAKE MATERIALS WILL BE STANDARD 2'x 4"WOOD OR EQUIVALENT. 3.BALES SHALL BE SECURELY ANCHORED IN PLACE BY EITHER TWO STAKES OR METAL WITH A LENGTH OF 3 FEET. 3.WIRE MESH ACROSS THROAT SHALL BE A CONTINUOUS PIECE 30 INCH RE-BARS DRIVEN THROUGH THE BALE.THE FIRST STAKE IN EACH BALE SHALL 4.SPACE STAKES EVENLY AROUND INLET 3 FEET APART AND DRIVE MINIMUM WIDTH WITH A LENGTH 4 FEET LONGER THAN THE THROAT. BE DRIVEN TOWARD THE PREVIOUSLY LAID BALE AT AN ANGLE TO FORCE THE 18 INCHES DEEP.SPANS GREATER THAN 3 FEET MAY BE BRIDGED IT SHALL BE SHAPED AND SECURELY NAILED TO A 2"x 4"WEIR. WITH THE USE OF WIRE MESH BEHIND THE FILTER FABRIC FOR SUPPORT. BALES TOGETHER.STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN FLUSH WITH THE BALE. 4.THE WEIR SHALL BE SECURELY NAILED TO 2"x 4"SPACERS 5.FABRIC SHALL BE EMBEDDED 1 FOOT BELOW GROUND AND BACKFILLED. 9 INCHES LONG SPACED NO MORE THAN 6 FEET APART. 4.INSPECTION SHALL BE FREQUENT AND REPAIR REPLACEMENT SHALL BE MADE IT SHALL BE SECURELY FASTENED TO THE STAKES AND FRAME. PROMTLY AS NEEDED. 5.THE ASSEMBLY SHALL BE PLACED AGAINST THE INLET AND SECURED 6.A 2"x 4"WOOD FRAME SHALL BE COMPLETED AROUND THE CREST BY 2"x 4"ANCHORS 2 FEET LONG EXTENDING ACROSS THE TOP OF THE 5.BALES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USEFULLNESS SO OF THE FABRIC FOR OVER FLOW STABILITY. INLET AND HELD IN PLACE BY SANDBAGS OR ALTERNATE WEIGHTS. AS NOT TO BLOCK OR IMPEDE STORM FLOW OR DRAINAGE. MAXIMUN DRAINAGE AREA 1 ACRE MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA 1 ACRE U.S.DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE U.S.DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE U.S.DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FILTER FABRIC U.S.DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE STRAW BALE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE LANDGRADING NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CURB DROP INLET NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DROP INLET NEW YORK STATE SOIL&WATER CONSERVATION COMMITTEE DIKE NEW YORK STATE SOIL&WATER CONSERVATION COMMITTEE DETAIL NEW YORK STATE SOIL&WATER CONSERVATION COMMITTEE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION PROTECTION PROTECTION NEW YORK STATE SOIL&WATER CONSERVATION COMMITTEE WOVEN WIRE FENCE SYMBOL SYMBOL (14 1/2 GAUGE I .max I EXISTING I W/6"MESH PAVEMENT 10'C.TOC. SPACING) 3 s'r CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 36"LENGTH FENCE EXISTING FILTER �� MOUNTABLE BERM POSTS DRIVEN 16" GROUND CLOTH PROFILE (OPTIONAL) 1.ALL GRADED OR DISTURBED AREAS INCLUDING SLOPES SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING INTO GROUND PROVED SEDIMENT RING AND CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AP CONTROL PLAN UNTIL THEY ARE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 2. ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES AND MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED, ������ HEIGHT OF FILTER APPLIED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED SEDIMENT 16" EXISTING CONTROL PLAN AND THE"STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL EROSION t` GROUND AND SEDIMENT CONTROL IN DEVELOPING AREAS". REV j�A VIEWED �` "U"' W W W Wy y W W W t EXISTING 3. TOPSOIL REQUIRED FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF VEGETATION SHALL BE STOCKPILED PAVEMENT IN AMOUNT NECESSARY TO COMPLETE FINISHED GRADING OF ALL EXPOSED AREAS. E ®EC PERSPECTIVE VIEW 4. AREAS TO BE FILLED SHALL BE CLEARED,GRUBBED,AND STRIPPED OF TOPSOIL TO01 -Y• I / / ��9L)PLAN VIEW REMOVE TREES,VEGETATION,ROOTS OR OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL. 36"FENCE POST 5. AREAS WHICH ARE TO BE TOPSOILED SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF WOVEN WIRE FENCE(14 1/2 GAUGE W/6"MESH SPACING)WITH FILTER FOUR INCHES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL. . ALL FILLS SHALL BE AS REQUIRED TO REDUCE CLOTH 20" CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 6SETTLEMENT,SUBSIDENCE OR OTD ER RELATED PROBLEMS.FILL(INTO NDED TOGS, FLOW �"- UNDISTURBED GROUND SUPPORT BUILDINGS,STRUCTURES AND CONDUITS,ETC.SHALL BE COMPACTED 1.STONE SIZE-USE 2"STONE,OR RECLAIMED OR RECYCLED CONCRETE EQUIVALENT. IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR CODES. 7 7 COMPACTED SOIL 2.LENGTH-NOT LESS THAN 50 FEET(EXCEPT ON A SINGLE RESIDENCE LOT WHERE 7.ALL FILL TO BE PLACED AND COMPACTED IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED 9 INCHES EMBED FILTER CLOTH 16" A 30 FOOT MINIMUM LENGTH WOULD APPLY). IN THICKNESS. 5 6"IN GROUND. 3.THICKNESS-NOT LESS THAN SIX(6)INCHES. 4 q»L� 8. EXCEPT FOR APPROVED LANDFILLS,FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE OF FROZEN 3 ADDRESSED COMMENTS DATED 12/9/19 04/08/2020 SECTION VIEW 4.WIDTH-TWELVE(12)FOOT MINIMUM,BUT NOT LESS THAN THE FULL WIDTH AT FARTICLES,BRUSH,ROOTS,SOD,OR OTHER FOREIGN OR OTHER OBJECTIONABLE 2 ADDRESSED DEIS COMMENTS 07/17/2019 POINTS WHERE INGRESS OR EGRESS OCCURS.TWENTY-FOUR(24)FOOT IF SINGLE MATERIALS THAT WOULD INTERFERE WITH OR PREVENT CONSTRUCTION OF 1 IREV.TO 44 ROOMS-UPDATE UTILITIES 04/11/2017 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS ENTRANCE TO SITE. SATISFACTORY FILLS. Number Revision Descripbon Revision Date 5.FILTER CLOTH-WILL BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE AREA PRIOR TO PLACING 9. FROZEN MATERIALS OR SOFT,MUCKY OR HIGHLY COMPRESSIBLE MATERIALS SHALL 1.WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES OF STONE. NOT BE INCORPORATED IN FILLS. Designed By Date Submitted OR STAPLES.POSTS SHALL BE STEEL EITHER"T"OR"U"TYPE OR HARDWOOD. TC 01/20/17 6.SURFACE WATER-ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD CON- 10. FILL SHALL NOT BE PLACED ON SATURATED OR FROZEN SURFACES. 2,FILTER CLOTH TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE STRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE PIPED ACROSS THE ENTRANCE.IF PIPING IS 11.ALL BENCHES SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF SEDIMENT DURING ALL PHASES OF Drawn By TQLT Date Created 08/23/16 FENCE WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24"AT TOP AND MID SECTION. IMPRACTICAL,A MOUNTABLE BERM WITH 5:1 SLOPES WILL BE PERMITTED. EEVELOPMENT. Approved By Scale FENCE SHALL BE WOVEN WIRE,121/2 GAUGE,6"MESH OPENING. 7.MAINTENANCE-THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL BG AS SHOWN PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY,ALL 12.SEEPS OR SPRINGS ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE HANDLED IN Client: 3.WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY SHALL BE OVER- SEDIMENT SPILLED,DROPPED,WASHED OR TRACTED ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY PCCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD AND SPECIFICATION FOR SUBSURFACE DRAIN LAPPED BY SIX INCHES AND FOLDED. FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE EITHER FILTER X, MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD. THE ENCLAVES MIRAFI 100X,STABILINKA T140N,OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 8.WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED,IT SHALL BE DONE ON A AREA STABILIZED WITH 13. ALL GRADED AREAS SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING 56655 ROUTE 25 4.PREFABRICATED UNITS SHALL BE GEOFAB,ENVIROFENCE,OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. STONE AND WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE. FINISHED GRADING. SOUTHOLD, NY 5.MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND MATERIAL REMOVED WHEN 9.PERIODIC INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AFTER EACH 14. STOCKPILES,BORROW AREAS AND SPOIL AREAS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND Project "BULGES"DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE. RAIN. SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS STANDARD AND SPECIFICATION. U.S.DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE U.S.DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE STABILIZED U.S.DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE SILT FENCE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE LANDGRADING NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION CONSTRUCTION NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SPECIFICATIONS SITE PLAN NEW YORK STATE SOIL&WATER CONSERVATION COMMITTEE NEW YORK STATE SOIL&WATER CONSERVATION COMMITTEE ENTRANCE NEW YORK STATE SOIL&WATER CONSERVATION COMMITTEE EROSION CONTROL Project Address: 56655 ROUTE 25 SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK County Tax Map Number. Contract Number. 1000-63-3-15 Regulatory Reference Number. Tide of Drawing: - SEDIMENT AND 4 EROSION CONTROL N DETAILS N Cl Drawing Number: c 0 U N C . o m W m >.i Sheet of 3 9 14 PWGC Project Number. Unauthorized alteration or addition to this drawing and related documents AVG 16 01 z Is a violation of Section 7209 Qo of the New York State Education Law o >i a Y i` NOW �� , `r_ � `-? LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF LAPID NOVA OR FOt,:> ERLY OF I � c� � � r _ Esc rl " > VALERIE.M.SCOPAZ j VINCENT DO'»0,�1ITE&ILEA:',,,DOLOVITe � � I. � i S,C3T MN NO, 1000-03-03-17A I S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-1 ..,....-. ..,. ..� ._.. LA.R' }NOl'a't FOR°,'LRLY OF l r.t _ Landscaping ANTE O`N'Y FORGIONE NOTE:DIRECTLY EAST OF HOTEL t-= S C T M PCO �gnn�•r�i-0�-17� ; ROOM,PLANT CUPRESSOCYPARIS LEYLANDII 18'-20'TALL. i cn !. I 1. ALL PLANTS SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS AS NOTED IN THE LATEST EDITION OF �- THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN,ANSI ACER RUBRUM CUPRESSOCYPARIS I \\ Z60.1. 'OCTOBER GLORY 2 ORNUS FLORIDA ! LEYLANDII 134 - j O ORNUS FLORIDA ( ) �} VAR.RUBRA 5 ,a "P 2,t 537'4 `43»E -- r, - -r;"' � 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS OWN QUANTITY TAKEOFF. VAR.RUBRA 1 ( ) I C22.r . I` _. - ----- --• - r,. : .: �z _ ,- ,. __._. ..._____._ 1 . .....-wrCw<>... —�+.--•Pm+--�8b.. .a,''✓� _ a"a; ;.L , a %r,y • i .^ ..,t .¢ +, '';• f-'-.,, !, •� `: ':' , 6 « ny ,:,.: ..,,. ',5./dt•', \a...� Ir.Y t s , 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKEOUT PLANTINGS ,' „ GS FOR ENGINEERS AND/OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS APPROVAL s f'd, �u4., "" '' t... a,#V ., a•#,(. _ �,, �, a '7,. ,. ^%iii•^ t --�"-'-- -- �S"7� a0..: "` - _ �.� PR -� _ IORTOBEGINNING . , � . ,:� ;�,.:.: =. . � as,�..x >� �, WORK o �' , %; ;4 - i 'r v , '#r e r, "f. 1' `f"`• r , a r.. _ CORNUS FLORIDA' A r Strategic,r '�, ,• � e Env r,. � Environmental mental a nd Engineering neerin �. I Solutions TAXUS X MEDIA 9 ut ons T 9 " 1 .: ''•' •".""-�..,..,_;,J,;. ," .-` .`'':< "!„ic,' '*;-,;•- •I•' t r , ; \ VAR.RUBRA --� � � 4. SHOULD LOCATION OF TREES BE WITHIN 5'OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES RELOCATE SAID TREES TO MIN.5' HICKSII (82) FROM BALL TO UTILITIES. a- ”" a .. _ J L____ S TREES BE WITHIN 20'OF OVERHEAD UTILITIES, RELOCATE SAID TREES TO MIN.20'TO LDLOCAT ION OF „ / `•- k ;� >R ,. ,,, ,; ;; ,, , -- ,;. , , , ., , __ ,. _ _ _„_ _. ,_..r�_.�.WV..:.:.:::::::. __-.-,_ t', WIRES.TREES WILL BE PLACED ON UNDISTURBED EARTH AND BACKFILL WILL CONTAIN AT LEA /J Vi An ., I .� � `Yd.,, `#!s. "3 ,�lC.,. ,; ; s '"^w� // ;.� �, / . . �, i� ..... ... .... ,; o t -` _,� � � n ✓�/ ... S� ._._._ � l ST 50 , ,/. /. � _� :....... ..� PERCENT OF THE SOIL TAKEN OUT OF THE PLANTING HOLE T ro _, --_----•---' ..».......-_..........,_u.,-e..�....,�.,.:' / 0 PROMOTE GROWTH IN THE SURROUNDING Y ( `' / z / // ' SOIL. / �. �. , , .................................... _, -, ` �, . ,' ,., /', / ,�”' Tei _,_ _._ o �,. TAXUS X ED �^� 4! ' �/ I 630 Johnson i r; 41 , :. f ' /,/ /. / $ MEDIA Avenue. . Suite 7 I ; 1 e' fi_ I, - -. HICKSII 22 ... ..-.' _..... ,btty. ;,.,. ,,:,': _... >��ro _. ._._.._... � / •. / ,./ '"""^"�2� ._....._....._....:. _ a.o ( ) i;�-- 6. ALL BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4 INCHES OF FINE SHREDDED►ac,, �,; _�„, ,,,, ,z - ,, ,_ / .,� ' /, ,•. I, > � � ,. , j •,� I!_s ED BARK MULCH AND SHALL BE KEPT AWAY Bohemia . NY. 11716-2618 - - «: :•° ___ , FROM THE IMMEDIATE BASE OF TREES AND SHRUBS. X ,:,'URE �., CORNUS FLORIDA " Phone: 631 589-6353. Fax: 631 589-8705 ACER RUBRUM t r` R D ENT„is, ,'T VAR RUBRA u. .-FR,.. 7 E-mail: INFO PWGROSSER.COM __.L LANDSCAPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN HEALTHY AND VIGOROUS GROWING CONDITION. PLANTS THAT FAIL 'OCTOBER GLORY'(1) �,: / _._._ . -.., SHALL BE REPLACED WITH PLAN ..,• , �� /� / -- - _._...... TS OF COMPARABLE SIZE AND TYPE AT THE BEGINNING OF THE NEXT 2 �. GROWING SEASON TO MAINTAIN PLANT DENSITIES AND SPECIES MIX. CONSULTANTS / / 1 i o 8. PLANTING OF DECIDUOUS TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL OCCUR BETWEEN APRIL 1 TO JUNE 1 AND OCTOBER 15 ..... ... .............. ... . I " ar�l�„ - ' aro"; ) Y _ .,i" \� ri � � TO DECEMBER 15. PLANTING OF EVERGREEN TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL OCCUR BETWEEN APRIL 1 TO JUNE ACED RUBRUM ..........-= 1 AND SEPTEMBER 1 TO NOVEMBER 15. / , _ :'i<. 3 , ,ai OCTOBER GLORY 2 L'.�' / a#Ir„ LIGUSTRUMX \ .'. .: "," IF PLANTING AND/OR SEEDING IS IMPRACTICAL DUE TO TIME OF YEAR,TEMPORARY MULCH MUST BE �' '- --'-" -.-- �, ""=- , �, •. ;'/,/' ' !, /' ( j 'I , : I' I APPLIED UNTIL FAVORABLE WEATHER CONDITIONS PERMIT GERMINATION AND GROWTH BUT NO MORE _ SS% CORNUS FLORIDA $ IBOLIUM 26 4 THAN 6 MONTHS AFTER PROJECT COMPLETION. ( ) 2'-'', , '\ VAR.RUBRA(2) is • 10. D TO A DEPTH OF 8 INCHES AND RAKED TO REMOVE SOD CLUMPS, TAXUS X MEDIA ('"` N' WEEDS,STONES AND OTHER FOREIGN MATERIAL EXCEEDING 2 INCHES IN DIAMETER.IMMEDIATELY AFTER I ACER RUBRUM - � . . , . :- `•:-:-, . . . ,•. . -. I I - �` PLANTING,WRAP DECIDUOUS TREES TRUNKS FROM BASE TO FIRST LIMB W 4 t _+ of WITH INCH WIDE BITUMINOUS , �#:�, H CKS 172 ,..____ :...:� t. LIGUSTRUMX i;, � ; ,� I„�,: '- • .,... ., : � i ; / ,'�:, INSECT RESISTANT TAPE OR PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR THAT PURPOSE TIE WITH JUTE AT o �..-'., l .: !� % \ , . i) k -.r - LIGUSTRUM X,,. OCTOBER GLORY' , IBOLIUM 48 ' / { . -._ ;, „-.._. ..,.v vr. ... ...,:._. -..;.. j; TOP AND BOTTOM. THE TRUNK WRAP SHALL BE REMOVED ONEI/ / r _ t: `�) YEAR AFTER PLANTING. IBOLIUM(80) UPON COMPLETION OF LANDSCAPING WORK A CORNUS FLORIDA ALL EXCESS SOIL DEBRIS,BRIS ETC HAL o „ --_ - -----....------_-..._> .q:,>'. ?, THE SITE SHALL BE IRRIGATED. SPRINKLER HEADS AND PL „ ,. _-, .. .... : I Y __ 3_.._,j r — PLUMBING FIXTURES SHALL NOTENC ENCROACH UPON ANY SITE.EMOVED FROM THE -.-.- L>, VAR.RUBRA(1) �" RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF THE TOWN F LIGUSTRUMX`: _ 0 SOUTHOLD. USTRUM X .,- ... � LIG I . . : r J: JUNIPERUS DAVURIC 1i !' IG STRUM X A I L U .` XPANS -- rr IBOLIUM(48) -� IBOLIUM 36 {��� � � �.. ,/ 'E A(5) `� .i A 1 BOLIUM(36) I _� VAR RUB ( ) r-� AM __._. I' i : t , 41 ✓i — I CUPRESSOCYPARIS "a :t s.. LIGUSTRUMX '- � ' i i e 'u. ... _..._.. a,.. LIGUSTRUMX ? ;. LEYLANDII(10) f IBOLIUM(48) = . IBOLIUM !!! (25) li _ i 1 i .............. U { { I ' I r: \ j -A / g LIGUSTRUM �IBOLIUM(53) _•; ,� � ---- ---� �, „_,► -- IL'i - =��==- ��f OR I�'Qa�M'_€�s_Y OF ' LAND NOY"�' i �,: ..-• �......... ..:_.:.:,_,,.._., ._..._.,_.......__ i - -- ' �; EUGEN SI ,. TOMASIC IC .. ...::.:........ u i h I r r I /. ,1E3C✓IE� iS N TOPv'r`� C� .IRELLA TO '' S , t S,C.T.P,.. I,0. 10,,0 0314 `•, ..- n !, ,...... , �__ NOTES O 1 ii 1 I LIGUSTRUMX ( - i, / t o rte' ,_ _ \.\ J; RNUSfLORIDA `° REMOVE ALL PLASTIC&WIRE TABS. �. NATURAL AREA ---�' "" � ' i � , _�. ... t�=' o ' �., ;: IBOLIUM(25) �. i�+ '/� '`� ,� . _�..�. ..,,.�-_�-__ ACER RUBRUM G VAR T BURLAP FROM SIDES _ 'OCTOBER GLORY( ) k I � RA(2 _ � " ) � OF NOT CU RUB �... \ LIGUSTRUM _. 29 ` . h ! F BALL. _ � X IBOLIUM JUNIPERUS DAVURICA ``'` h _ - -o _- o - - k `! ''" REMOVE Y' 1 CORNUS FLORIDA; :x1 „" --.— _ _.__.. " �4t r VE ALL PLASTIC CORDS FROM ' - i t ( ) ( ) - — r, ACER RUBRUM LAN NOW{)may FO�("e1 LY OF TREE BALL,IF PRESENT. VAR.RUBRA(2) 75 EXPANSA 12 - `; IwE? 'OCTOBER GLORY(1) JANET L.RYAN JUNIPERUS DAVURICk,.C•TA4. NO, 1000-�3-03-13 I 'EXPANSA(5) _ i . !". yuf'n ( - - - - - - '_ e, a•br.-, " ..s, ay's.j...' "L kyg"r: ;4 la::.. X''Is i7' .. "?°'. +� / �_ .. p �, �' � �;,�,: :;,• � UPRESSOCYPARIS war �' `.°� I':'«wi " �' tt, - �" � '` .n. ,ti`"�%'+,°:.°'�rri`•�;± - 2 LEYLANDII(5) _ ,'. 14 BC �;#(6,rN .- , W - - _ r. 'a:" s Z = EVERGREEN TREE FINAL A P �1 t / t twn Sp Nak c#mn, `\ " .._-..___.. ____ - Z i l CORNUS FLORIDA CORNUS FLORIDA _ _._.._._..____._-_____. } ' ACER RUBRUM VAR.RUBRA(2) - ', VAR.RUBRA(3) _._ Z REVIEWED I EWE D Y 'OCTOBER GLORY'(3) / - SOIL SAUCER,TOP W/MULCH "' �'' CUPRESSOCYPARIS SET TOP OF ROOTBALL 1"ABOVE DECISION, I -�, f_P: fID NOW OR FOR"""F'I_Y OF as 't _ �g r- LEYLANDII 46 ij 11,ND NO'=S:'OR FORMERLY OF FINISH GRADE • IlP.!"LE 'r, aR``ItI`E ( ) SHREDDED BARK MULCH AT4"DEPTH DATED / I t`�a �, » �, PILLS REALTY IOLDI"1G LLC . .# E 1%'O. 100 03-2c.=,1 AND MIX W/F COMPOST, OM OSBACKTLLL S.C.T.I'b1, N0. 1000-63-03-12 4"DEPTH ,t G 1 MIXTURE REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 li l I;`�;,r-,,,<; ' LANDSCAPE PLAN Q OF PLANTING BALL 7 i_sRl? 6 ?? m 25%COMPOST�NTING MIXTURE 5 SCALE: 1 n = 40' 75 RANGE:IL6. TO 7.0 4 ADDRESSED FEIS COMMENTS 05/11/2021 5 LBS.TYPE 1-ROOT GROWTH 3 ADDRESSED COMMENTS DATED 12/9119 04/08/2020 -- _ - 0 40 80 _ ENHANCER PER CUBIC YARD OF 2 ADDRESSED DEIS COMMENTS 07/17/2019 MIXTURE 1 REV.TO 44 ROOMS-UPDATE UTILITIES 04/11/2017 n r BALL DIA. DO NOT EXCAVATE LOWER THAN Number Revision Description Revision Date SCALE: 1 = 40 BALL DEPTH.IF EXCAVATED BELOW THE BALL DEPTH BACKFILL AND COMPACT BALL DIA.x 2 MIN. TO PREVENT SETTLEMENT. Designed By Date Submitted f--EXISTING TREE TC 01/20/17 AT TRUNK TYPICAL TREE PLANTING Dr awn By TQLT Date Created 08/23/16 �- O r1 PLANT CENTER ROPOSED �; �> ••;{' pl}= ,j�'•__,�. f` STONE RETAINING BG AS SHOWN •f✓-„ �, (p ,;,,, SCALE: NTS Approved By $�� t t PLANT ROW Client: r;y WALL -777 PRUNE 1/5 OF GROWTH& i TYPICAL ON CENTER ' THE ENCLAVES 12"MAX.WALL HEIGHT g BROKEN BRANCHES BUT .. O i O SPACING AS LABELED ON + .. 56655 PLANTING PLAN -,. _ _ -. ..__.._._.. .�"..,. _.,_._...» .:......_ __.....�_.e._ ,.. .._. ROUTE 25 � •r •4.: RETAIN LEADERS ANDPLAN-ePACM ,.�..._.,«..........�.-. .__......�._.,.............,..,.,,.•,.., - „ NATURAL FORM OF SHRUB ' SOUTHOLD, NY 18"MIN. PLANT SET AT ORIGINAL PLANTING Project \ ; —s — ;• • DEPTH ft r 0 QTY 3"MULCH WITHIN BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING '%" „',� ;!'�.,;:. -• �••M+'«^vw� •�R"cw�.r— 3"DEEP SHREDDED BARK MULCH AS SHOWN GRASS SEED AS SHOWN AS SHOWN SITE PLAN _h' :. •''• / 12"MIN. EARTH SAUCER SEED PROVIDE FULL COVER PLANTING BACKFILL 'i_ ,;,�ti;-.':. : ,.���>= >� •:'a" ,• AS SHOWN �CT10N WHERE SHRUBS ARE PLANTED WEED BARRIER CORNUS FLORIDA VAR,RUBRA RED FLOWERING 5'-6'TALL,B&B AS SHOWN IN MASS EXCAVATE ENTIRE DOGWOOD PLANTING BED AS SHOWN LAIV D S CAP E PLA N HEDGE TRIMMED TYPICAL GROUND COVER LAYOUT LIGUSTRUM X IBOLIUM NORTHERN PRIVET 2 GALLON CONTAINER AS SHOWN Project Andress: SCALE: NTS 56655 ROUTE 25 MIXTURES. ROOT ROOT AS ER AS SHOWN CUPRESSOCYPARIS LEYLANDII LEYLAND CYPRESS 14'-16'TALL,B&B AS SHOWN,8't O.C. TOPSOIL MIXTURE (EAST PROPERTY LINE& (134) SOUTHOLD a. 3"DEEP SHREDDED BARK MULCH BALL BALL A.A. STD. STP AREA SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK AS SHOWN CUPRESSOCYPARIS LEYLANDII LEYLAND CYPRESS 8'-10'TALL,B&B AS SHOWN,8't O.C. XISTING TREE Q UNDISTURBED EARTH (WEST PROPERTY LINE) (61) County Tax Map Number. Contract Number. 6"MIN. 1000-63-3-15 AT TRUNK AS SHOWN JUNIPERUS DAVURICA'EXPANSA' PARSONS JUNIPER AS SHOWN Regulatory Reference Number. x'• �`...:%'. — PLANTING BACKFILL MIXTURE III III► 2 GALLON CONTAINER TitleotDrawng: ROPOSED `` _ "i'! _ V Y 11111 lip STONE RETAINING I—I I(_! t I�_�11= AS SHOWN ACER RUBRUM'OCTOBER GLORY' RED MAPLE 2.5'-3"CALIPER,B&B AS SHOWN WALL I—�I-III —III= AS PER AS PER � ....• . ., III T'I—I A.A.N.STD. A.A.N.STD. AS SHOWN HEDGE TRIMMED LANDSCAPE PLAN a. TYPICAL SHRUB PLANTING MIN. MIN. TAXUS X MEDIA'HICKSII' HICKS YEW 2 GALLON CONTAINER AS SHOWN SCALE: NTS TYPICAL LARGE SHRUB PLANTING 18 MIN. SCALE: NTS AND DETAILS A i I .4 NOTES: EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN-SHOWN WITH LIMIT OF TREE CANOPY- CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TREE TEMPORARY TREE PROTECTION PROTECTION FOR ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN PRIOR TO EXCAVATION,GRADING,CLEARING OR GRUBBING. o SCALE: NTS •"•" ' FINISH GRADE(LAWN) 1.SPRAY ALL PLANTS WITH ANTI-DEssICANr. TREE PROTECTION SHALL USED TO LIMIT ROOT DISTURBANCE PER DETAILS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. CONTINUOUS CLEAN, =� SHARP,&SMOOTH 2.SHRUB SHALL HAVE SAME RELATION TO FINISH GRADE • j SHOVEL OR TROWEL AS EXISTED AT NURSERY. 12 aak_. EXISTING TREE DESCRIPTION AND SIZE •� SHAPED EDGE BETWEEN LAWN AND 3.IF BALLED&BURLAPPED,REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP. NOTE: Drawing Number. o 6 j•' \ MULCHED AREAS a a. .4. 4.REMOVE ALL PLASTIC&WIRE TAGS w' a,• .. : •�. , FINISH GRADE(MULCH) ALL TREES,SHRUBS,AND GROUND COVERS SHOWN TO W //\\%/\ 5. REMOVE ALL PLASTIC CORDS FROM TREE BALL,IF APPROXIMATE SCALE AT 10 YEAR MATURE SPREAD TOTALS T- \\/\\/\\ PRESENT IN GROUPINGS OF SHRUBS,EXCAVATE ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED UPON FIELD INSPECTION. 0! 0 12"MAX.WALL HEIGHT / / AND BACKFILL ENTIRE SHRUB BED AREA w A W/PREPARED BACKFILL ALL TOPSOIL FOR PLANTING SHOULD HAVE A LABORATORY E \\/\\ TESTED ORGANIC VALUE OF 5%MINIMUM.SOIL SHALL HAVE A s PH VALUE BETWEEN 6-8.SOIL SHALL BE FREE OF ALL STONES Sheet of o NOTE: PERMANENT TREE PROTECTION AND ORGANIC MATTER LARGER THAN 1 1/2"DIAMETER.SOIL 10 14 a " WHEN GRADES SURROUNDING TREES PERMANENT TREE PROTECTION TYPICAL EDGING BETWEEN LAWN AND MULCHED AREAS FOR PLANTING PITS SHALL BE AMENDED AT THE RATE OF a q GREATER OR LESS THAN 1:2 SLOPE OR 1 r SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS CUBIC YARDS OF WELL ROTTED MANURE PER CUBIC YARDS PWGC Project Number. ai OF TOPSOIL. '`'.. .•�'' ai GRADE CHANGE. Unauthorized alterationor docadduments AVG1601 W CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR EXISTING TREES to this drawing and related documents 41 Is a violation of Section 7209 o SHOWN ON PLAN. of the New York State Education Law µ 0 a a' z L L1 2- TOWN HAR70'� ............ ...... ........... ...... LANE 0 0 > C:; 0 LAND NOIN OR FORMERLY OF VALERIE M. SCOP,1`7 U) 1.1)"ND NOV1l OR FOR'.7R1.Y OF 0 F1 &CA'.M, NO. 1000-63-03-16 LAND t,=,]OR F07.4z.RLY Of- ANTHONY FOT*?'1,f0'JE IiI l''T Vl%!C°NT DO110M;ITE 8, ILEAN'P,UOLO'' S,C.TJ�, NO, 1C00-r,�1-03-,7,3 0 C6 5.C3,M, NO, 1000-153-03-17A 27 Strategic Environmental and Engineering Solutions 1-31',141 40"E 312 ------------- ti - ------------ it 12F, i 2t tea. ___�-2- 630 Johnson Avenue. Suite 7 Bohemia . NY 11716-2618 _J -7777-17-- Phone: (631) 589-6353 Fax: (631) 589-8705 /77— ......... ............... ...... .......... ....... .............. < E-mail: INFO@PWGROSSER.COM 7T 4, —29 C, CONSULTANTS 71 PITUD7 1-�TORY EVE 1�7 29 W W z z ........ ------ o 0 0 ZZ22, o — - 4 ; e ........... . ........... W UJ 4! T-- (C.i 0 Y. F ............. .............M -------— "j, ................. ........... ...................... N."A'4 20V ti _Jli : I. Ail -� I .---•"..; is ,' A .., ;! i a�/' ,� �: it i i;i j -A vv .. ............... J, .......... ='H f LAND NOIN OR FO!�MERLY OF i 01 EUGEN'TO��,ASIC&WRELLA TOMASIC Ql\ .................. -63-03-14 LOCUST LAI'17 ..................... ........................ ... ........... ..................... ................................ C.TAI. NO. 1'ffl I II I AND;NOW OR FOR�,IERLY. � °' ; � �? gip.: � _- -- - - - -- +\� ��,. „��`�r� j OF JANET L. RYAN &C.TiM, NO, 1000-63-03-1'1 FINAL MAP _J L REVIEWED BY ZBA SEE DEMSION 29 DATE D 04 1CP_D'Q1 LAND NOW OR FORMIERLY OF FILLIES REALTY HOLDING LLC 7 32 S.C,T.M. NO, 1000-63-03-12 6 AS1 LED AREA LUMINAIRE 75 WATT 5 LIGHTING PLAN MODEL :AS1 LED 42C 530 50K SR3 4 ADDRESSED FEIS COMMENTS 05/11/2021 '" 5/11/2021 PNE. MVOLT-BRONZE 5134' LAND NO�V OR FORWERLY OF SCALE: 1 40' 3 ADDRESSED COMMENTS DATED 12/9119 04/0812020 (10' MOUNTING) 2 ADDRESSED DEIS COMMENTS 107/17/2019 SINGLE PHASE, 208 VOLT T_ CHAPLES W.k","ITZKE I REV.TO 44 ROOMS-UPDATE UTILITIES 04/11/2017 SiC314. NO. 100�-P"-03-28,Q 40 80 Number Revision Description Revision Date SCALE: 1 40' Designed By Date Submitted TC 01/20/17 3MH 10'-0: HIGH x 4"SQUARE Drawn By TC\LT Date Created 08/23/16 ALUMINIUM LIGHT POLE, Approved By BG Sc* AS SHOWN NOTES SMOOTH ALUMIUM 6063-T6 Client: ALLOY, 0.125 MIN.WALL THE ENCLAVES THICKNESS 1.DIRECT BURIAL CABLE 6"OR 12"BEHIND EDGE OF PAVEMENT THROUGHOUT AND AT A DEPTH OF2'-0"BELOW MANUFACTURER: USS 56655 ROUTE 25 2MH FINAL GRADE. MANUFACTURING INC. SOUTHOLD, NY 2.CABLE IN PVC OR GALV. IRON ELECTRIC CONDUIT WHERE CABLES CROSS WALKS OR DRIVEWAYS,SIZED AS MODEL: USS 40A10AB-SQ Project: INDICATED AND 7-0"BELOW FINISHED GRADE,AND AT LEAST 2'-0"BEYOND EACH WALK OR PAVEMENT EDGE. 3.LED 75 WATT FIXTURES AND POLES AS SPECIFIED. 2#12 THW+ 1 #12 IMH GROUND TO FIXTURE SITE PLAN 4.LARGE DIAMETER CABLES ARE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN NO MORE THAN 3%VOLTAGE DROP AT EACH FIXTURE. EXTRUDED HANDHOLE SITE LIGHTING PLAN 5.SPLICING OF VARIOUS SIZE CABLES SHALL BE DONE IN BASE OF POLE AND SPLICES SHALL BE WATERPROOF. Project Address: • SPLICE IN POLE 56655 ROUTE 25 OMH NOTE AT HANDHOLE SOUTHOLD —3/4" DIA. GALVANIZED ANCHOR BOLTS SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK MIN.28" LONG 4 EACH PER POLE FUTURE EVENT SPACE LIGHTING FIXTURES TO BE SIMILAR TO THE HOTEL BUILDING FIXTURES. ASTM A576 (TYP.) County Tax Map Number. Contract Number. 1000-63-3-15 Regulatory Reference Number, Title of Drawing: I MH GRADE: 2" 2" GRADE 10.0— 811 _0. 4 _ .,i SITE LIGHTING A J 4 DIA. SCA.40 PVC 4 ELECTRICAL AND DETAILS 2MH 2'-6" MIN. BURY 4 CONDUIT WITH TWO 1.0 4 4 (2)#10 RR-USE-2 4 44 0.5 COPPER 6-3/8" CONDUCTORS PLUS 4'-6" MIN. DEPTH ONE (1)#10 RR-USE 114 Drawing Number. 3MH GROUND. 4 4A 13" JrL_ /--4,000 PSI CONCRETE WITH 6"x6" JL 7t 0.1 22-1/4" 4 4 10/10 WELDED WIRE FABRIC 4 REINFORCED 4 4 A MANUFACTURER: FECO(DIVISION 4 . Sheet Of 4 OF OLDCASTLE PRECAST) 4 11 14 14 1 41 A PRO 4MH 3MH 2MH 1MH MH MOMTING HEIQMH 2MH 3MH 4MH VIDE SHOP DRAWINGS BEFORE AS1 LED LUMINAIRE SKETCH 4 CASTING BASES PWGC Project Number. Lii A J 2 UnauthorLzed afteration or adOm 10' POLE LIGHT PHOTOMETRICS SCALE:1-11/2"=V-0 to this drawing and related documents "G1601 J N' IS,L' Is a violation of Section 72M SCALE:1"=10' 16"W x 16"D_ Of the New York State Education Law i U-1 Q N II o a _ — TOWN HARBOR w LANE LUo QUOo 1 o � o LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF Q ROPOSED � ,��, Z VALERIE M.SCOPAZ PROPOSED PERVIOUS FORCES MAIN Strategic Environmental and Engineering Solutions LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF ANTHONY FORGIONE LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF REMOVE Q ^' S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-16 RESTAURANT PARKING ROPOSED6.5 9 9" 9 9WE EXISTING Z } ~ WOOD POSTS (GRASS PAVERS) HIGH STOCKADE VINCENT DOLOMITE&ILEANA DOLOMITE fn Z U WITH NETTING PROPOSED LINE OF EXISTING FENCE PROPOSED 100% S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-17.3 PROPOSED6.5'HIGH FENCE Z Q EXISTING ROPOSED VALVE �� ® ® �JC % LEACHING POOL OODEN STOCKADE FENCE S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-17.4 ROPOSED �c' = rn I �+ STOCKADE FENCE DRIVEWAY TO BE SHED TO BE RENOVATED AND REMOVE g CHAMBER WI ACOUSTIC BARRIER a F- ❑ } REMOVED INCORPORATED INTO MAIN EXPANSION AREA REMOVE EXISTING HIGH STOCKADE d Z \ RELOCATE EXISTING STRUCTURE d EXISTING ROPOSED SEWER FENCE FENCE 27 ! Q " STORY FRAME PROPOSED 10' DIA. \ ' 310.00' " FENCE �b; �J _� / GARAGE TO REMAIN 26 BY 15' EFF. DEPTH ° 2s HOUSE CONNECTION 622 78 28 �2 ti i / �, S07°44'40"E 30 Sol 38'10"E ) *- - __. - — IGN 630 Johnson Avenue. . Suite 7 LEACHING POOL 31 s 00 -2618 Bohemia - NY- 11716 (TYP OF 5) - _ ., :>crl'C. ° . < s--- s-- $_ -- s - s--- S— - s S s 8 --- - EL Ph - 589-8705 _ ,,.. ».,>r to {` s s- EXIST L one: 31)589 °.- c.1.< sio:�-• `^ �' s-- - � s PROPOSED NEW PROPOSED O " �I _i (6 353 Fax. (631) 58 / € t PROPOSED STP °..._ -r.,., Af.Yf., ( -dc form, r s s- s__ s— s- - s s__ - s s ___ s_ PERVIOUS DRIVEWAY I RELOCAT _ r STATION E-mail: INFO@PWGROSSER.COMB s—_ _ S S _ s___._- s PUMP CONTROL If e -- s--- s 29 s s-- s— s s ' \ m POVERFLOARKING 1 \ IRR WELL 126 0 LCV f_ 5--- BUILDING (10'X23') ° - OPROP I - -- s--�-s'�_ s Q F— o ) 0' P CONSULTANTS PERVIOUS s I 5 PROPOSED PARKING — - \ s q , �p EXISTING TOBE1_ ,� J�- z 0 s ° �'^ J \ e . %' O s rn REMOVED EFFLUENT FLOW \ ° o �' I e /METER �/ / / %�, '_ \ �o / s s 7 EXISTING T02STORY z M Z ob --1 -- — O SIGN / � , / / / / O STRUCTURE TO REMAIN PROPOSED 29 \ / 6.5 ARB GE PROPOSED RESTAURANT Cb SEWAGE ° �.? \ m /,; / i /// / / — 28 w 27 - s- s AREAS-- -- -- -- 0 - s FF:27.5 Z i / / , / ' FUTURE 1-STORY s s I_ s9 I I / TREATMENT 3 x 75 \° s 5�s_ ;, /// P -1aEz'tr / EVENT SPACE o [ 3 I O s orl ____ PLANT AND 100% r , ---_-------_I ^ PRTOSEDADDITI N10 RD , W W ROPOSED 10 % 22'-0" EXISTINGSIRU r EXPANSION AREA x I 50 % i' /' ;�/ [2s / 26 t DIA. BY 5 LIQUID j '' /'j / /' '' / /' j/ m /slate ° QZ Z PROPOSED ' '- /' / r DEPTH GREASE WATER SERVICE O /';/ / / // �; /,j- /j/ �— p 3 wA1�nY g ¢ TRAP /, OPOSE PERVIOUS o 25' s s / %/ %//�'/,. / i/i ' j a— 3 3�_ r1 T� RKING d Z Z yGN PROPOSED // // . / , �,:%/" i 3 3 U�n� auanuuuuc ecuu� naa uuu " `�. slat EXISTING BE � _ > > ROPOSED MECHANICAL s " �, LAWN ISCULP RE — 6RA SPAVERW " AY. . ' " eLJ 0 (GRASS ERS) z r X sFp TU a 3 3_ a��• a REMOVED 3 N O m WATER SERVICE r s ROPOSED 6 5'HI�H \ / GARDEN n r 3 m m rr 50 M r 6 / ''/ O PROPOSED PERVIOU 2 11 � C/ SCREEN 75 g I � wooDENsroc�f CE � ,' / O W Q O WI ACOUSTIC BARRIEF2 \ \ 27 i/,// Fp HOTEL PARKING $ W PROPOSE O �Fp (GRASS PAVERS) CONSTANT GRADE EL.30.5\ HEAD BOX x \_1 o PROPOSED \ \ I � T /' ' \ \ �r NEW PROPOSED DRIVEWAY w z -` i FA o c AND PARKING Z J COTTAGE 1 / 4, o 0 PROPOSEfY HOT \ // o ' U v 9 EQUALIZATION / PARKING s s TUB J( \CHESS BOARD cp ` n c U s� PUMP STATION 25 AREA ,�. - - ... R POOL CABANAS--'1`W: \NASA ___ j \--- �FFA`" F M P F FP �- o --0M Mev M _ M M M PROPOSED 17 " < -- 3 f•�--• __TW:30.5 'T1N_30.5 i/ D2CORATIVE ':,� � SHED V V O BW:27.25 BW:27-2K5_ % N04° 5'20 = SEWER MAIN \ _ I ;' / POND 178.00' 3 32 \ \ ii /" - 3 COTTAGE 2LID HOT \ 6 5 2 Q d PR�POSED 2 2 2 TUB RD PROPOSED 2.5'H \ \ �,.` ,' : ` PROPOSED 6.5'HIGH PERVIOUS STAINING WALL GRADE EL.27.5' + }� // ! w L WOODEN cb m EL.R).?5 /%F.-��'2 ¢ STOCKADEFENCE w ROPOSED J pVERFLOW w^ -. \ HOT 1 a Z a WATER SERVICE RkING m I _ - PA - TUB / w PROPOSED U ' —a // o n o PERVIOUS tl 3 Q m 1 o u o OVERFLOW o \`HOT COTTAGE 3 t E i/ O \ a a a PARKING F / O U 'J 1 vwi I TUB \ POOLAREA �! 3 SIG 4 RL M D O A ) COI RTS ' / o r 0 7.5 HOT `-- /i / / / -- \ n w w } / ;n r 0 W Cb / Z (\ °' a m `.� f TUB 4�17 L._ o, a a O G HOTCOTTAGE 4 RD BW: 7.20 BW:27.25 C -� n r m m a PARKING / s` v nr Z LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF `o PROPOSED " TUB TW:3 .5 RAMP- 1W:30.5 RAMP t� or n [28 2 Q J EUGEN TOMASIC&MIRELLA TOMASIC LIRR N AREA ° r S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-14 LOCUST LANE PROPERTY 11 WALKWAY uuuau;nncncccnnunuana u c . cuau a OC 10-0" LINE Z 12 O \ -- nnv❑ noncrrnnu nnuaarau,F r:cctif�5 �/4V.��V tI�V�A1(au >anonna�{Anecrnnno. 'R --- f O i N 6 $ /• f� a 61 � I i "0 '--_ PROPOSED a n PERVIOUS v ` !i I- OVERFLOW FINAL A P AREA d ! ---{ -- ---- .__`_ � [29_ �' PARKING cb 34 32 \ -i;� PROPOSED PARKING AREA �1 \ \ o SIGN REVIEWED tt � ' \ - \ �' M LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF `" 0I co I NEW PROPOSED DRIVEWAY �' _--- ------- ` 1' JANET L.RYAN SEE DECISION '�Y 3a ! 31 i S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-13 — ------II \ 2' DATED i o— I t� I PCOI co J 22'-0" P 00) co 34 v- v v---0- a- -n--v -C--v v--a--v-v-o-- v-v--v -a- -v v-a-v-t-c- v-- 1 / L N05-�50"W 616.57' \ I r 7 PROPOSED 6.5'HIGH I —28 _ ��s \ I 6 `3 11 - WOODEN \ b1 � STOCKADE FENCE LAND NAW OR FORMERLY OF 29 5 CHARLES W.WITZKE 301 LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF 4 ADDRESSED FEIS COMMENTS 05/11/2021 to S.C.T.M. 1 NO. 1000-63-03-28.1 31 PROPOSED 3 REVISED PER CLIENT'S REQUEST 02/18/2021 PIECES REALTY HOLDING LLC PERVIOUS I 2 ADDRESSED COMMENTS DATED 12/9/19 04/08/2020 32 OVERFLOW S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-12 1 REV.TO 44 ROOMS-UPDATE UTILITIES 04/11/2017 PROPOSED SITE PLAN Number Revision Description Revision Date v-v- -0- n--o--- PARKING N05°30'54"W 51.34' \ SCALE: 1rr - 40' Designed By TC Date Submitted 01/20/17 Drawn By Dale Created 33 0 40 80 TC�LT 08/23/16 Approved By Scale BG AS SHOWN SCALE: 1 = 40 Client: .r r THE ENCLAVES e. ..,:. •._. .._..,. ._....W a. . ,_. ,... .._...- ..,. _ ._,_. _u .,. .,-.. ...,:_. . .::..-.._ - w - w - ... ._. 56655 ROUTE 25 SOUTHOLD, NY Project: ALLOWABLE SANITARY DENSITY FLOW STP DESIGN FLOW 6.75 ACRES X 600 GPD/ACRE=4,050 GPD PROPOSED RESTAURANT DESIGN FLOW OVERALL SITE PLAN PROPOSED SANITARY DENSITY FLOIN 74 SEATS X 30 GPD/SEAT=2,220 GPD SANITARY LAYOUT 74 SEATS RESTAURANT X 10 GPD/SEAT =740 GPD PROPOSED 44 UNIT HOTEL 44 UNITS HOTEL X 150 GPD/UNIT =6,600 GPD Project Address: 250 SEATS EVENT SPACE X 5 GPD/SEAT =1,250 GPD 150 GPD/UNIT X 44 UNITS=6,600 GPD 56655 ROUTE 25 TOTAL SANITARY FLOW =8,590 GPD SOUTHOLD PROPOSED EVENT SPACE DESIGN FLOW SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK SINCE PROPOSED EXCEEDS ALLOWABLE A SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT(STP)HAS BEEN PROVIDED. 250 SEATS X 7.5 GPD/SEAT=1,875 GPD County Tax Map Number. Contract Number: 1000-63-3-15 PROPOSED RESTAURANT-GREASE TRAP SIZING REQUIRED STP DESIGN FLOW:2,220 GPD+6,600 GPD+1,875 GPD= 10,695 GPD Regulatory Reference Number. - PROPOSED 74 SEATS RESTAURANT Title of Drawing: LEACHING POOL DESIGN KITCHEN FLOW=20 GPD/SEAT X 74 SEATS=1,480 GPD PROPOSED SITE REQUIRED: 10,695 GPD/5 GPD/SF=2,139 SF PROPOSED 250 SEATS EVENT SPACE 4 PROVIDED: NEW LEACHING POOLS ( ) LAYOUT AND k KITCHEN FLOW=2.5 GPD/SEAT X 250 SEATS=625 GPD 10'DIA.LEACHING POOL HAS 31.4 SF PER VERTICAL LINEAR FEET VLF A 2,139 SF/31.4 SF/LF =68.12 LF TOTAL KITCHEN FLOW: 1,480 GPD+625 GPD=2,105 GPD FIVE(5)OF 10'DIA.BY 15'EFF.DEPTH LEACHING POOLS UTILITIES PLAN " 75 VLF PROVIDED; GREASE TRAP DESIGN W REQUIRED: 2,105 GPD X 1 DAY=2,105 GPD Drawing Number, o a U PROVIDED: (1)10'DIA.x 5'LIQUID DEPTH GREASE TRAP(2,500 GAL) E Sheet of a 12 14 Q N g T PWGC Project Number: Unauthorized alteration or additlon z to this drawing and related documents AVG 1601 Is a violation of Section 7209 o of the New York State Education Law o a LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF ANTHONY FORGIONE LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF PROPOSED 100% S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-17.3 PROPOSED 6.5' HIGH I VINCENT DOLOMITE & ILEANA DOLOP WOODEN STOCKADE FENCE S.C.T.M. NO. 1 000-63-03-17.4 " LEACHING POOL I REMOVE W/ACOUSTIC BARRIER Strategic Environmental and Engineering Solutions EXPANSION AREA REMOVE EXISTING EXISTING ROPOSED SEWER FENCE PROPO.c,�ED 10 DIA. FENCE HOUSE CONNECTION 3 n. BY 15 EFF. DEPTH29 622.78' L 30 S07038'1 0"E - 630 Johnson Avenue. . Suite 7 LEACHING POOL '; 31 I Bohemia . NY. 11716-2618 - ;n Phone: 631 589-6353 . Fax: 705 (TYP OF 5) ` a f— s E-mail: INF @ WGROSSER.COM a nc ,-,jaa°i1l c t - s -- ` S_— S CONSULTANTS PROPOSED STP .afence -- $-- S— --- S-- S--- s-- 5— S_— s--- s--- _ S s f nc; °� f ry - _r,. 8 _ \ CONTROL -- 31 29 a__ S_— s-- BUILDING 10'X23' ° f- \ ®/ PROPOSED s( ) O (D4 . ERVIOUS 011 _ - \ OVER -5- PROPOSED \ ° \ / PARKING $" I EFFLUENT FLOW \ ° \ e Ito ).............._....... � r � 1 METER 1;— ---- g PROPOSED o�;''�� \ i 0 SEWAGE y \ z 75 \ � � \ \ PROPOSED HOTEL / TREATMENT 3\ \ Q FF EL. 32.0' / PLANT AND 100% x W s a s- � s— \ EXPANSION AREA \ \ � 50 \ o \ \ / PROPOSED 1 X 4 \ \ WATER SERVICE \ \ PROPOSED �$ s MECHANICAL 75' 50' g g�g S I PROPOSED 6.5' HIGH \ SCREEN x s�s� X WOODEN STOCKADDE FNCE \ \ \ ® W/ACOUSTIC BARRI PROPOSE CONSTANT X 1 \ HEAD BOX GRADE EL. 30.5' 0 FINAL fAP P R 0 P 0 S E D' \ x 1 PROPOSED HOT COTTAGE 1 REVIEWED FW Zt� ,% EQUALIZATION TUB \ \ SEE DECISION \ 25 PARKING s s S—s—S ® _CHESS BOARD �� �� PUMP STATION DATED P, AREA - ,.-z ... �,M . . I RD POOL CABANN PROPOSED ` TW: 30.5 \TW 30.5 SEWER MAIN Y ' ® BW: 27.25 BW: 27:25 45 32 _ �'__-___ \ \ \ _a 7 COTTAGE 2 z 5 ADDRESSED FEIS COMMENTS 05/11/2021 RD \ 4 REVISED PER CLIENT'S REQUEST 02/18/2021 ARCS . ( 2. PROPOSED 2.5 H \ 3 ADDRESSED COMMENTS DATED 12/9/19 04/08/2020 S S s-�A1-- — ' 'RETAINING WALL GRADE EL. 27.5' +E�: - ADDRESSED DEIS COMMENTS 07/17/2019 IY' QVE w� ,_N, A � � 725 \ REV.TO 44 ROOMS UPDATE UTILITIES 04/11/2017 Number Revision Description Revision Dale p PR,ANG a I f \ \ HOT \- TUBDesigned By Date Submitted TC 01/20/17 Q I Drawn By Date Created Q Approved By TQLT Scale 08/23/16 °- COTTAGE3 HOT Client R -E 18 BG as SHOWNw I / 1 U) T POOL AREA o w e aL yU6 \ THE ENCLAVES o RD 56655 ROUTE 25 '�� �"`�" - ® PLAYc07--i O RTS SOUTHOLD NY / 0 1 _ '""" """~" GRADE EL. 27.5' HOT \ Project: ' TUB I RD HOT COTTAGE 0 BW: �7.20 BW: 27.25 \ PARTIAL SITE PLAN o I PROPOSED TUB TW: 3 .5 RAMP-- W_ TW: 30.5 --- RAMP 0 `r PARKING s ............8—s SANITARY LAYOUT LI RR �`' n PROPERTY AREA 11 _ - - - Project Address: O WALKWAY 56655 ROUTE 25 LINE SOUTHOLD Z \ 12 � \ ` SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK 21 — County Tax Map Number. 1000-63-3-15 Contract Number. o I � Regulatory Reference Number. Title of Drawing: PROPOSED HOTEL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20' PROPOSED SITE 3 0 QL 0 20 40 LAYOUT A N D N SCALE: 1" = 20' UTILITIES PLAN w N Drawing Number, $ U 0 1 h W O W o m E Sheet of o 13 14 ¢ c1 N r n '^ PWGC Project Number: Cd iu Unauthorized alteration or addition z to this drawing and related documents: AVG 16 01 W Is a violation of Section 7209 ' 's o of the New York State Education Law �o J a a Strategic Environmental and Engineering Solutions / � 0 0ej 0 0 ' 630 Johnson Avenue. . Suite 7 Bohemia . NY. 11716-2618 Phone: (631) 589-6353 - Fax: (631) 589-8705 E-mail: INFO@PWGROSSER.COM CONSULTANTS IT LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF PROPOSED VALERIE M. SCOPAZ PROPOSED PERVIOUS FORCE MAIN I S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03-16 RESTAURANT PARKING PROPOSED 6.5' I GRASS PAVERS WOOD POSTS ( ) HIGH STOCKADE WITH NETTING PROPOSED 6.5' HIGH LINE OF EXISTING EXISTING 1 STORY FRAME FENCE ROPOSED VALVE ' `' _....__. ' STOCKADE FENCE DRIVEWAY TO BE SHED TO BE RENOVATED AND REMOVED INCORPORATED INTO MAIN CHAMBER \ RELOCATE EXISTING 1 STRUCTURE �- STORY FRAME GARAGE TO REMAIN 26 310.00' 7 \ ; S070 44 40 E SIGN rl EXIST WELL I PROPOSED s PROPOSED NEW PROPOSED / well7 o PUMP STATION PERVIOUS DRIVEWAY \ I RELObAT OVERFLOW 11 .. IRRI N WELL i 26 r) N PARKING �. .; I \ — Q W s 01-00: s i' L EXISTING TO BE �i , �\� -------- ----- Z O s z?, r- REMOVED _ - -- — _ 6'- 2 Q U) s s a' � cb ;: s 7 EXISTING TO 2 STORY 2 Z O — 7 STRUCTURE TO REMAIN ,. O \ SIGN FFitNiA, �. xr, 6.5 GARB GE PROPOSED RESTAURANT r cb ❑ s \ FF: 27.5 AREAREVE L ''` y ZBA28- W o o _\ SEE D - -- I C 26 s' I ECt,.�l�.����� a= S � �cS`,, � I 5 e s a S �, DATED I -------__-- - _ PROPOSED10' �`--= LU ______________________ ------- - ROPOSED ADDITION TO 0 22'-0" EXISTING�STRUCTU RD \ 26 3 � z z DIA. BY 5' LIQUID 7 0-1 - slate o DEPTH GREASE 5 \ \ ® � WALKWAY - Ci J J 4 _ (� TRAP `� 3'-� a T 3 ADDRESSED COMMENTS DATED 12/9/19 04/08/2020 € / ® _ 3—� 3— 3 ROPOSPERVIOUS o —O—GN 2 ADDRESSED DEIS COMMENTS 07/17!2019 _, _ _ L j L u .; f 3/ r—'1 RtMU T3�RKING -4' cu 11 a 1 REV.TO 44 ROOMS-UPDATE UTILITIES 04/11/2017 OB 3 ROPOSED Number Revision DescriptionRevision Date C.1 t1 C: i.::1 [1C.7f; '.7L., r. nrancnr innnon [1 C1 f1 I7 f1 f1 i t1 1 @�/Lli_; [� t .. L. $late J '-� EXISTING T E (GRASS P VERS) ,1 — z WATER SERVICE 3— 3 3 !J L 3 3 3/ REMOVED T 00 O m Designed By Date Submitted r/ i� , 3 3— 3 3 3 W W Of ' 13 ❑ 3 3 O Drawn By Dale Created ° C 6 ® PROPOSED PERVIOUS 2 11 (n TC�LT 08/23/16 O I o 0 E, (� Approved By BG snare AS SHOWN n HOTEL PARKING 0 W Q Client: Cl G (GRASS PAVERS) W THE ENCLAVES I 3 Ej56655 ROUTE 25 _ ._. .__ __..._. _.-;...-.. f r -0 SOUTHOLD, NY C1 NEW PROPOSED DRIVEWAY w v Projed: i-:, ri ❑ AND PARKING w _z z CI _z '� O O 0 Ej I -u U rJ 0 _ — — 0 c U PARTIAL SITE PLAN \ 0 o Lt- M M M M SANITARY LAYOUT M P Fp _ _ M�ML w P FP--.FP 1 FP F P...J I... FP FPM F FP F �—FP FP FP�FP P--�_-Fp—.-_� -�—YP'— -__.p_.-__p M-o---a FP -FP -- _.--o M M M M M M M f L_ \ FP�—.FP� p-_—p FP Fp�-- F -=Q,---�P� r �P�"----pP-��—�-- FP- _ F Project Address: j SHED _ N04°5120th 1762 nn, -r > 56655 ROUTE 25 PROPOSED RESTAURANT SITE PLAN SU FOLOKCOUNTY, NEWYORK SCALE: 1" 20' County Tax Map Number: Contract Number: 1000-63-3-15 Regulatory Reference Number: 0 20 40 Title of Drawing: SCALE: 1" = 20' PROPOSED SITE 0 LAYOUT AND UTILITIES PLAN 3 W oN N tom] Drawing Number. o 0 U rn W m A Sheet of N 14 16 3 ' PWGC Project Number: w w Unauthorized alteration or addition z to this drawing and related documents AVG 1601 F Is a violation of Section 7209 Qo of the New York State Education Law o R a.a AMERICAN MADE C.I.FRAME _ VIM M O.D.PLUS 2'MAX WITH SLOTTED COVER OR C.I.FRAME WITH SOLID (SEE NOTE BELOW) COVER BY NEENAH, „s FINISH LAYER MATERIAL CAMBELL OR APPROVED EQUAL GRADE ADJUST TO FINISHED RIM ELEV. PAVEMENT CURB LINE GRADE WITH BRICK FRAME&GRATE ALLOW 4”MIN.FOR Strategic Environmental and Engineering Solutions SOILS IN EXCESS OF 9"BELOW FINISH GRADE 1'MINIMUM,4'MAXIMUM SIZE OPENING FOR ADJUSTING OF PAVEMENT SUBGRADE ASTING CASTING i COMPACTED TO 90%AASHTO T- 9 (MATERIAL AS PER DESIGN) 1.. 12"DIA PIPE AT 10%MIN LIMIT OF WORK DOWNSPOUT SLAB OV ER CONC. � � '� � � . ` -' ■ M GN CLASS IV RCP PIPE — — — FF • , , . , . . . , BY SITE CONTRACTOR r �; ``. ,' DRAINAGE RINGS WRAPPED GRADE _.... .. CAST IRON CLEANOUT WITH BRASS FERRULE 3'-0'':: m®® ® � s'0" WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BACKFILL ABOVE SPRINGLINE T (CAST IRON PIPE PAINTED TO COLOR MIN — _ . MIN SUPAC 4NP OR — — — — m En� ® — #30 ASPHALT Avenue. . Suite 7 APPROVED EQUAL BE PLACED IN 12"LIFTS °. SPECIFIED BY ARCHITECT.) m®® ® — — — Q ROOFING FELT 1' m a• NY. 11 - Johnson630 s°Mw. - Bohemia 716 2618 FIRST FLOOR " J- 3'-0"MIN. RING DEPTH VARIES PAST GRAVEL Phone: (631) 589-6353 • Fax: (631)589-8705 ' AS PER DESIGN ®a® ® ® e COLLAR 6" E-mail: INFO@PWGROSSER.COM an PRE-SHAPED FOUNDATION OR 18" GRADE ®® ® BACKFILL UNDER AND ® ® ® ® TYP SPRINGLINE FLAT FOUNDATION WITH a ° D _ _ _ _ AROUND DRYWELL WITH REINFORCED — BACKFILL TAMPED INTO PIPE PVC SDR18 PIPE FITTINGS SIZE TO BE ®�© © GRANULAR MATERIAL X10"� CONCRETE PRECAST CONSULTANTS HAUNCHES AT CONTRACTORS ( ) : CONTAINING LESS THAN RINGS —� DISCRETION a COORDINATED WITH DOWNSPOUT — 15%FINE SAND,SILT,& LEACHING RING FERNCO SERIES 105G COUPLING FOR CAST �' m ® ® �j — CLAY. (SILT&CLAY IRON TO PVC PIPE m®® ® FRACTION NOT TO BEDDING(CLASS I,Ii,OR III) 4° EXCEED 5%) 4" WHERE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL a ° m®® ® ct BACKFILL PLACED ALTERNATELY IS ENCOUNTERED DURING TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM _ —NP' TYPICAL 12" EXCAVATION OF PIPE 001=1 DRAINAGE RING ® ® ® IN 6"LIFTS ON BOTH SIDES OF TRENCHES. 5'0" PVC(DR 18)@ 1.0%MIN. X10"� GRAVEL COLLAR T-0" PIPE UP TO SPRINGLINE 8" T-0"MIN.TO ELEVATION GROUNDWATER MIN.ALL AROUND NOTE: 1 GROUNDWATER LEACHING RING BACKFILL UNDER AND NOTE 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE DOWNSPOUT SIZE WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. - AROUND DRYWELL WITH 12'0"0 GRANULAR MATERIAL 1- IF DEPTH OF TRENCH EQUALS OR EXCEEDS 5'-0",THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE SIX(6)FOOT MIN. CONTAINING LESS THAN SHEETING AND BRACING.AS AN ALTERNATIVE,THE TRENCH WALLS MUST BE CUT BACK TO '' PENETRATION INTO o A 1:1 SLOPE,OR THE NATURAL ANGLE OF REPOSE FOR THE SOIL,WHICHEVER IS MORE ROOF DRAIN DOWNSPOUT `` ACCEPTABLE LEACHING 12 15/o FINE SAND,SILT,& CLAY. (SILT&CLAY SHALLOW. SCALE: NTS j, MATERIAL. IF SAID FRACTION NOT TO 2- CLASS I,II,III OR IV COMPACTED BACKFILL MATERIAL IN ALL PIPE ZONES,PER USCS CONDITION CANNOT BE 12'-0"DIA. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM) ACHIEVED WITHIN THE EXCEED 5%) 3- SAWCUT 2'BEYOND TRENCH FOR PAVEMENT RESTORATION WHERE REQUIRED. NOTE: FIRST SIX(6)FEET BELOW NOTE: PRECAST CONCRETE 1. ALL DRAINAGE LEACHING POOLS TO HAVE 10 FT.EFFECTIVE DEPTH. THE BOTTOM of THE LAST 1. ALL LEACHING CATCH BASINS TO HAVE 10 FT.EFFECTIVE DEPTH. FOOTING WITH THE LEACHING RING,CONTINUE PIPE TRENCH DETAIL DRAINAGE LEACHING POOL THESIX(6)FOOT MNONOF SCALE: NTS CIRCULAR WICK,UNTIL DRAINAGE - LEACHING CATCH BASIN SCALE: NTS APPROVED PENNETRATION SCALE: NTS NYLOPLAST 24" DRAIN BASIN: 2824AG CAST IRON CURB INLET TRAFFIC BEARING BICYCLE SAFE(BY ©®INTEGRARAMEE&GRATE OTO 'CAMPBELL') MATCH BASIN O.D. ALLOW 4"FOR FINALADJUSTMENT OF RAME 2-0„ �OQOOO�O 1a•MIN WIDTH GUIDELINE 5 8"- Soy 5 < e e « 8" MINIMUM PIPE BURIAL 8"MIN THICKNESS GUIDELINE _ ®VARIABLE INVERT HEIGHTS DEPTH PER PIPE AVAILABLE(ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER <5 \ 10'-0" 10'-0" PLANS/TAKE OFF) RECOMMENDATION (��R TRAFFIC LOADS:CONCRETE SLAB DIMENSIONS ARE FOR GUIDELINE 0 0 ti ANGLES PURPOSES ONLY.ACTUAL CONCRETE SLAB MUST BE DESIGNED O ` #4 BARS IN TOP SLAB(4"O.C.) VARIABLE 0°-360° TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION LOCAL SOIL CONDITIONS,TRAFFIC ACCORDING TO LOADING,&OTHER APPLICABLE DESIGN FACTORS. PLANS ANAL �A M 0 0 5 GROUT AROUND ENTIRE PIPE 18"MIN. S DRAINAGE PIPE SEWER MAIN OR REVIEWED `� ti CORRUGATED HDPE DRAINPIPE / HOUSE CONNECTION ®VARIABLE SUMP DEPTH s OR APPROVED EQUAL I J ACCORDING TO PLANS(6"MIN) c (� 6' 0.5%MIN. 4'-0" OPENING I SEE DECISION # !` 18"MIN. ®VARIOUS TYPES OF INLET&OUTLET ADAPTERS 4"MIN DATED — -'��I i \ AVAILABLE:4"-24"FOR CORRUGATED HDPE f('V11 c7`)' 17-11 1 11 (ADS N-12,ADS SINGLE WALL,RANCOR DUAL WALL), I POLYPROPYLENE COATEDY2" / SDR 35,SCH 40 DWV,CORRUGATED&RIBBED PVC s STEEL RUNGS @ 12"O.C. 4 10'-0" 10'-0" THE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHER \--PIPE INVERT 5 < QWATERTIGHTJOINT GRANULAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS II S (CORRUGATED HDPE SHOWN) MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321.BEDDING&BACKFILL FOR 1'-6"SQ. OPENING FILLED m-GRATES/SOLID COVER SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PER ASTM A536 GRADE 70-005, SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BE PLACED&COMPACTED 7 ®-FRAMES SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PER ASTM A536 GRADE 70a-M ti < WITH GRAVEL j UNIFORMLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321. ®-DRAIN BASIN TO BE CUSTOM MANUFACTURED ACCORDING PLAN DETAILS. 6 RISERS ARE NEEDED FOR BASINS OVER 84"DUE TO SHIPPING RESTRICTIONS. S / '•` SEE DRAWING N0.7001.110-065 5 ®-DRAINAGE CONNECTION STUB JOINT TIGHTNESS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM D3212 4 ti — FOR CORRUGATED HDPE(ADS&HANCOR DUAL WALL)&SDR 35 PVC 6" ti n y S 8" ©-ADAPTERS CAN BE MOUNTED ON ANY ANGLE D°T0360°.TO DETERMINE MINIMUM 3 ADDRESSED COMMENTS DATED 12/9/19 04/08/2020 y z S ANGLE BETWEEN ADAPTERS SEE DRAWING NO.7001-110-013. __ S 2 ADDRESSED DEIS COMMENTS 07/17/2019 _ DRAT@ OPTIONS A ATt P RT# A N A OP O $ L p 0 R NG A DR WI G THIS PRINT DISCLOSES SUBJECT MATTER IN WHICH NYLOPLAST HAS PROPRIETARY RIGHTS.THE RECEIPT OR 3130 VERONA AYE 0 0°o abG o 0 o°J oo boo - 0 1 REV.TO 44 ROOMS-UPDATE UTILITIES 04/11/2017 O o V o b o O o G O O - 's 1'£2iAN -"'% <'sii.Tn 24"39CGF° 7G7 i-i 4.24rs POSSESSION OF THIS PRINT DOES NOT CONFER,TRANSFER,OR LICENSE THE USE OF THE DESIGN OR TECHNICAL BUFORD,GA 30518 1'-6" 1'$" UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE $inNGA€+:J ^ p1"«?-TS H zJ 2a Fx;» 7 i'Jt_t r6 827 INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN REPRODUCTION OF THIS PRINT OR ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN,OR PHN(770)932-2443 Number Revision Description Revision Date - At 4,-4" 8. sC.a CG L'. k rSs+oro 2av3�J(;G 7(:1to 1w2te MANUFACTURE OF ANY ARTICLE HEREFROM,FOR THE DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS IS FORBIDDEN,EXCEPT BY SPECIFlC N V FAX(770)932-2490 •"7r......p:0�' WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM NYLOPLAST. www.nyfophmt-us.eom .........(_ i4Gt.rt7J TY .........2apif5l 7Gat•10-075 ........ .. ........... ................ ..............._................................. TITLE Designed By Dale Submitted 241N DRAIN BASIN QUICK SPEC INSTALLATION DETAIL TC 01/20/17 SIDE VIEW TOP VIEW DWG NO. 7001.110.192 REV B Drawn By Date Created DRAINAGE - CATCH BASIN DRAINAGE / SEWER CROSSING DETAIL TQLT 08/23/16 Approved By Scale SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS CATCH BASIN DETAIL BG AS SHOWN Client: SCALE:NOT TO SCALE THE ENCLAVES 56655 ROUTE 25 SOUTHOLD, NY Project: WATERPROOF INTERIOR FACE OF SITE PLAN CONCRETE RETAINING WALL WITH DRI-SEAL (OR APPROVED EQUAL)SILICONE EXTERIOR COLORLESS WATERPROOFING(5%). TOP OF WALL ✓✓ ELEV.30-5' t Project Address: 56655 ROUTE 25 12"THICK POURED SOUTHOLD CONCRETE WALL 3.25'REVEAL 4,000 PSI SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK No.4 BARS 12"O.C. County Tax Map Number. Contract Number. 3"MIN COVERAGE 13 QOM OF WALL 1000-63-3-15 Regulatory Reference Number. 27.25 No.4 BARS 12"O.C.ALONG EARTH SIDE Tide of Drawing: NOTE: FOOTING CONSTRUCTED ON .; 4'-0" 2 TON/SQ.FT.UNDISTURBED BEARING 2"x 2"KEY SOIL,OR PROPERLY COMPACTED it.ANo.4 BARS 18"O.C.6'-0"LONG 1'6" ENGINEERED FILL CERTIFIED BY A SITE 0 LICENSED PROFESSIONAL o ' ''• ENGINEER. s 1'6" DETAILS in No.4 BARS 18"O.C. o 6'-6" 0 N CONCRETE RETAINING WALL Draw ng Number. U SCALE: NTS 0 ! '! U3 m Sheet of N 15 16 3 PWGC Project Number: iu Unauthorized alteration or addition 5z to this drawing and related documents AVG 1601 Is a violation of Secdon 7209 o Of the New York State Education Law p 3 a a 0"(N.T.S.) N.Y.S.D.O.T. 9"DIA. 3/4" SIGN No.R1-1C CAPPED WITH CONCRETE III RESERVED J 4 -------------- I -- PARKING 30^ 10" ST P 7N, q 3"GALVANIZED(WEATHER TYPICAL TRAFFIC /l�� PROOF)STEEL MOUNTING CONTROL SIGN CHANNEL(TYP.)COATING TO 4"WIDE BLUE STRIPE COMPLY WITH N.Y,S.D.O.T. 3'-0" NEW BLUE HANDICAP REQUIREMENTS(SEE NOTE 1) SYMBOL - 6" 2"SQ.POST O T-O'MIN. POST PUNCHED FULL LENGTH 6"DIA.HEAVY DUTY PIPE FILLED Strategic Environmental and Engineering Solutions WITH 318"DIA.HOLES 1"O.C. WITH CONCRETE&PAINTED 20' ' 0 z YELLOW (NP) 7" O T-0"MIN. .- -' FINISHED 2' kr"PWI WIN= � , �.. O FLOOR ho 18"MIN.FROM EDGE OF 112"PRE MOLDED BITUMINOUS 'd 630 Johnson Avenue. . Suite 7 42" 27"DIA �5° O PAVEMRNT TO SIGN JOINT FILLER •.•.•. Bohemia . NY. 11716-2618 4^BELOW FINISHED OU 6„ PAVEMENT ,;, ,> I Phone: (631) 589-6353 . Fax: (631) 589-8705 GRADE a a Y 'r , y �i � - r 3'=0" CONCRETE V, 0 v REPAIR OR REPLACE SURFACE /.� ., E-mail: INFO@PWGROSSER.COM 1 FOOTING 2112"SQ.SLEEVE o 4;1 _.l.- / ' ° 36" IN KIND <. % `' 4,000 PSI 10' 10' $' CONCRETE FOUNDATION a O a ':. ��! CONSULTANTS 4,000 PSI @ 28 DAYS v O v 42" ✓// ✓ a<`� \T� iz, @ 28 DAYS o y ~. 7 2 112"SQ.SLEEVE v O vv DIRECT EMBEDMENT AS PER ` �, — PARKING STRIPING DETAIL N.Y.S.D.O.T.REQUIREMENTS v��� �' !i i `' 3" -- ^�....- ` SCALE: NTS -- - --------- ` -—I 6" 6 6a BLUE PAINT 1'-0" SQ. VARIES SEE PLAN HANDICAP SYMBOL TYPICAL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN DETAIL STOP SIGN DETAIL BOLLARD DETAIL SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS CURB .,,'.. EQ. <.�......« w' m SAWCUT EDGE OF EXISTING SIDEWALK TO 24"(TYP) CONCRETE WALKWAY PAVEMENT SUB-BASE FILL WITH 1/2"PREFORMED PAVEMENT RAMP VARIES SIDEWALK Y4'LIP —yl~— e"WIDE FULL DEPTH CONTINUOUS BITUMINOUS MATERIAL A EXPANSION JOINT BETWEEN CURB A &CONCRETE PAVEMENT(TYP AT 6" FACE OF CURB 24"(TYP) _ 4" y"EXP•,R• ALL EDGES OF RAMP) SECTION A-A 5 12 1 1/2" CONCRETE PAVEMENT _ -77 FG SIDEWALK Lu - Z 'r "�,:. e .,. ....... A " > o a J SIDEWALK VARIES WIDTH OF VARIES SIDEWALK RAMP He; 4'MAX. RAMP 4'MAX. — '�` RUN DETECTABLE WARNING '�_ I I_I I I_I I_ I�_I I_I I 6X6-W3XW3 WWF STRIP(1 FT.x 1 FT TILES) CONTRACTION JOINT EXPANSION JOINT i'M1 VARIES I ''—I I,. (NP) EVERY 4 '.:::. SEE PLAN 12 1 1. 2 6" I/—I(�— COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE M " EVERY 20' A ;;. Y"EXP.JT. Y"EXP.JT. COURSE ��J °°° ° RAMP RUN PLAN NOTE: , ..•.. r COMPACTED SUBGRADE LANDING o°o°o°o°o SECTION B-B SECTION AA ° ° ° ° �_ ^ DETAIL" 0 0 1:12 6"x 6"W2.9 DETAIL"B" STRIPING WIDTH TO kms'.•e,;: .....- .. ._,.,... .. MqX �A x W2.9 W.W.F. MATCH WIDTH OF WHITE PAINTED MARKING CONCRETE WALK CONCRETE TO BE 4,000 PSI @ 28 DAYS CONCRETE TO BE 4,000 PSI @ 28 DAYS ���• • CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WI E 4' -` BROOM FINISH LANDING COMPACTED 5"POURED CONCRETE EJ A i CONCRETE WALKWAY PLAN Q PAVEMENT(SEE PLAN FOR JOINT SPACING) CONCRETE TO BE 4,000 PSI @ 28 DAYS SECTION A-A A�� _ _ TRANSITION FLARE-WALKWAY NOTES: CONCRETE TO BE 4,000 PSI @ 28 DAYS �.w _ ... ...._ _ V MIN. Fi PAVEMENT OR LAWN AREA,SEE 114"RADIUS ;,:• Fy 9 A PLAN FOR SPECIFIC CONDITION1/2" 2. G AT THE TOP OF EACH CURB RAMP AND SHALL HAVE MINIMUM CLEAR DIMENSIONS E 1 THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF A SIDE CURB RAMP SHALL BE FIVE FEET1/4^ I i THERE SHALL BE A LANDING 1" IN �; °o°o° OFA48"BY 48"SQUARE. / 12:1MAX.SLOPE °o o°o°o° -' 12:1tJIAJtSLt3PE- CURB ,• FIN A A ro 0 0 0 0 3. THE MAXIMUM RUNNING GRADE OF ANY PORTION OF ANY CURB RAMP SHALL BE 1:12(8.3%). j RAMP 933h, o°o°o°o°o8.33°ln 112"WIDE FULL DEPTH ( ) ^� ��� a,r. r�"'1"� l_B� ° o / __ EJ___ 0 0 0 =-. EJ- 4. THE LENGTH OF THE FLARED SIDES SHALL BEAT LEAST TEN 10 TIMES THE CURT: EIGHT,MEASURED 24"(TYP) Ems".•�f °o°o° CONTINUOUS EXPANSION °o o ALONG THE CURB LINE. i ' JOINT BETWEEN CURB& � `„" ,�, . ���fj� ° 5. THE SURFACE OF ALL CURB RAMPS SHALL BE STABLE,FIRM AND SLIP RESISTANT. PROVIDE A COARSE �' CROSSWALK DETAIL L G. E t� /� J�1 x/ CONCRETE PAVEMENT(TYP AT BROOM FINISH RUNNING PERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE OF CONCRETE RAMP SURFACES,EXCLUSIVE OF r'S 1 V f, ' t" ALL EDGES OF RAMP) DETECTABLE WARNING FIELDS. SCALE: NTS DA's 6'MIN.TRANSITION TRANSITION CURB(TYP BOTH 6. RAMP TRANSITION BETWEEN WALKS,GUTTERS,OR STREET SHALL BE FLUSH AND FREE OF ABRUPT - DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP CURB TYPICAL BOTH SIDES SIDES) VERTICAL CHANGES 4"MAX.)a 61 FLUSH INTEGRAL CURB W/y" LIP JOINT SEALER 6" PLAN VIEW PLAN DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP 112"PREMOULDED y 3a 7 DETAIL A EXPANSION MATERIAL DETAIL B FINISHED 6 SIDEWALK RAMP DETAIL SIDEWALK RAMP DETAIL SIDEWALK RAMP DETAIL CONTRACTION JOINT EXPANSION JOINT GRADE \ \ \ T-1" 5" - PROPOSED 4 SIDEWALK DETAIL ��/��/��'�� 2" 3" PAVEMENT 3 ADDRESSED COMMENTS DATED 12/9/19 04/08/2020 SCALE: NTS 2 ADDRESSED DEIS COMMENTS 07/17/2019 A : NTS SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS • t 1 REV.TO 44 ROOMS-UPDATE UTILITIES 04/11/2017 18" a Number Revision Description Revision Date #5 BAR a Designed By Date Submitted (CONTINUOUS) I a TC 01/20/17 j R=1" Drawn ed TQLT Date Created 08/23/16 � Approved By )BG scale AS SHOWN Client: THE ENCLAVES DOME TOP :_':.;; %; CONCRETE TO BE 4,000 PSI @ 28 DAYS 56655 ROUTE 25 TERMINAL POST 2.875" BLACK VINYL PRIVACY SLATS "' ` " ;;'', '-''" O.D PIPE ;C..r'.:...:....-'.,...:....; ...a 1-1/2"TO COURSE T L , NY LINE POST 2.875"O.D.PIPE ;> •.-%` r :ILfI.i;�;•.r ;v:,' �. =;4 ,1 SOU HO D � , ,,:,. .;.,�..,;,- ;_ = 2-112"BINDER COURSE MOUNTABLE CURB DETAIL ,i" t ..v., Project TOP RAIL THROUGHOUT TOP,DIAGONAL, AND 1.66" O.D. / / \/�/%\//\//�%\//�/ 6"COMPACTED RCA 1.66"0•D.PIPE LINE POST TIE 12"O.C.8 BOTTOM RAIL 1.66"O.D.PIPE BRACE RAIL \//j\//j//j/ //j//j//j\//j\//\�//\\//\\/\\ SCALE: NTS GAGE ALUM.(TYP.) CHAIN LINK FABRIC CHAIN LINK FABRICCOMPACTED SUB-GRADE RAIL TIE 18"O.C. TENSION BAR 2:X6"GA.TYPE 1 ALUM.COATED BLACK VINYL 2:X6"GA.TYPE 1 PRIVACY SLATS ALUM.COATED 4x R='_,/2" SITE PLAN TENSION BAND 12"O.C. 1.66" O.D.BRACE RAIL fx g^ zx FINISHED BRACE BAND LINE POST LOOP TOP TYPICAL ASPHALT PAVING DETAIL GRADE 3" j SCALE: NTS 2a 6a PAVEMENT {{ PROPOSED EMEN ;d I• , i ` ; i::: i ''! (i i ( I :I EI E , II, I; :�. '`' ', ! 6.5' • HEIGHT Project Address: E i ii I i l'I.' ' I 18" ® 56655 ROUTE 25 ,f ACOUSTIC I , S BARRIER W/ �.. .. .. .. .. .. ...... I i: . li: .......... ....:........ .. .. ... ....... i. .. ..I. ..,.... ... .:: .. ....: ,:ij;' .il ii I' it ...L.......l. ...,.. .. .,. i....... (,.i ,: ::.':a.. .:I,;. :nI. MINIMUM STC OF2 c' :dji:' (, ,. .::..,.:11.,...,:L. :... ::.:. ,,. .�.::: is i.i.i... .:..... .... .L. . .......... ,„ �: E'.;ii #5 BAR { � SOUTHOLD I:i.!'ii 'II' ',� l I 2"ASPHALT CONCRETE TOP COURSE (NOISEOUT-20R LV-1 S F U FOL K COUNTY,i I TY N I EW Y OR K (CONTINUOUS) TYPE 1A-ITEM 70B ( ) .I: :;,fil4: ' i:a il� :.i .I. .i. r E::I ::. I.�.;:�I:: .::!:;i'ii ;IIIi'';� is li �'li: - County Tax Ma Number. ;:,.; I,.II:i IL: :i,.,: ! i,: b P Contract Number. i.: , I," �.f PROVIDE JOINT SEALANT I 4"ASPHALT CONCRETE BINDER COURSE 1000-63-3-15 3'-0"+MIN. TYPE 1B-ITEM 51FX(2 LIFTS) Regulatory Reference Number: - ., i Ti e o rawing: 3/8"(9.5 MM)DIA. ,? 12a DOUBLE GATES 6"STABILIZED SOIL AGGREGATE SUBBASE TRUSS ROD %j` 2"CLEARANCE 3'-0"MIN. 12'YP. SECURED BY CHAIN MATCH EXISTING COURSE(RCA)-ITEMI4S 8" BOTTOM SELVAGE 1 " AND PAD LOCK CONCRETE TO BE 4,000 PSI @ 28 DAYS 1..._ r GRADE LEVEL TENSION WIRE TRUSS ROD TIGHTENER WITH BRACE BAND 10'-0"MAX. 7 GA.TIE TO POST 12" POURED CONC. %,% CURB DETAIL 10'-0"MAX. FOOTING TYP. TYP. \��\�/\ /` '�''�''A-'\/\ //'/ •-rsPACE Q SCALE: NTS DETAILS 3"DIRT (TYP.) SUBGRADE'\/j\/j\� BACKFILL TYP. \\ \\>� >� r��>��>��>��>�\�\\/\\ ACOUSTIC SEAL 24" o EXISTING PAVEMENT AND SUB-BASE "SOD"PLANTING LEVEL TO REMAIN HDPE GRASS PAVER INSIDE CELLS 5/8„ W \CONCRETE CONCRE ACTUAL FINISHED GRADE CHAIN LINK FENCE DETAIL CHAIN LINK GATE DETAIL PAVEMENT PATCH DETAIL Drawing Number: SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS f0"— SOIL FILL LEVEL INSIDE PAVER GRIDWORK AFTER HEAVY WATER DOWN. 6a W THIS IS THE ACTUAL"SOD"PLANTING MEN" An LEVEL. Ts WOODEN STOCKADE FENCE DETAIL HEAVY VEHICLE SUB-BASE. SAND OR SANDY LOAM $g, SCALE: NTS 3/4"CRUSHED ROCK OR LEVEL WHICH RECEIVES CLASS 2 ROAD BASE THE PAVER GRIDWORK sheet of s 16 16 GRASS PAVER DETAIL PWGC Protect Number. OVERFLOW PARKING AREAS W w Unauthodted alteration or addition z� SCALE: NTS to this drawing and related documents AVG 1601 Is a violation of Section 7209 ao Of the New York State Education Law 0 o J a a L • . BROWN 538 BROADHOLLOW ROAD I SUITE 301 MELVILLE, NEW YORK 1 1 747 ALTMAN 8c D I L E O , L L P TEL 51 6-ZZZ-0222 I FAX 51 6-222-❑322 w,jibl, 2 KBDAQ@BROWNALTMAN.COM I WWW.BROWNALTMAN.COM March 26, 2024 40 Ha Electronic Mail and FedEx, Overnight Zoning Board of Appeals M ppEP Town of Southold �TN00NN �FA 54375 Main Road 7 Southold,New York 11971 Attn: Kim Fuentes, Board Assistant Re: The Enclaves Hotel; 56655 Main Road, Southold,NY 11971 (the "Property") ZBA File No.: 7046SE Our File No.: 100-513-001 Dear Kim: Our office is legal counsel to the applicant(the "Applicant") regarding its development of The Enclaves Hotel (the "Hotel") at the Property. Applicant has filed an application with the Southold Building Department (`BD") to obtain a Building Permit to construct the Hotel. Applicant, at the direction of Marriot Flag staff, kitchen designers, and the hotel management company, requested changes to the Hotel basement level floor plan (the `BLFP"). As such, BD Plans Examiners asked that we provide a courtesy copy of the revised BLFP to the Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA"). Attached you will fmd a copy of the April 23,2020,BLFP considered by the ZBA in connection with its December 6, 2021, Decision granting the Applicant's Special Use Permit Application (the "Approval"), along with a copy of the March 20, 2022, BLFP reflecting the changes thereto. Changes to the BLFP include additional kitchen space, a two (2) lane bowling alley, golf simulator, and a wine tasting room(collectively,the "Amenities"). Further, the size of the indoor swimming pool was reduced based on Suffolk County Department of Health Regulations. Commensurate with Condition Number Five (5) of the Approval, the Amenities are limited to Hotel guests,only. The BLFP revisions will not increase the number of Hotel employees or guests, will not increase required on-site parking, and does not increase permitted lot coverage. b� � zB►� ��' �v1se� BROWN ALTMAN &_ DILEO , LLP �'leaseinclu�e the enclosures with the ZBA's file(s). Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Brown Altman& DiLeo, LLP By: C9= av d N.Altman cc.: The Enclaves Hotel (attn:Andrew Giambertone,AIA; w/encls.; via electronic mail) PW Grosser(attn: Kim Gennaro,AICP CEP; w/encls.; via electronic mail) 2 *0 ---- ---- ------ ------ I" n 0i 'V-9, *0 EM : ANDREW V. ---------- CE---------- ---TT 0CM0 GIAMBERTONE --—-—- A, & ASSOCIATES H 00 00 - -------- 0 *ARCHITE 07 Isaa --------------------- 7 - 000 -70 62 Elm Street A Huntington,NY 11743 ------------------------------- TT ® Telephone:631.367.0050 Fax:631.367.6636 0 r= 0 U U.... ------- Giambertorip-Architects.com I - --- --------- 0110 0 The Enclaves 9LJ 56655 Route 25 Southold,New York r 16-003 t L hST -P 4 Q -—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-- I I Qmr�lm a H 4A 81 Z-K FIN 0 rm 7 F- 14ye 'WV.' .4' goo 0 0 TWA Not For Construction I 0 2023 AVGA Lower Level Plan �O Hotel-Lower Level Floor Plan iz-I�' nz J• Iz- a9•.15• 4-d6' aa•-n• �O �0� I al OISM � O o O � O co IWaa=Lft ———— I I w o o ® MPS ,Q�p, II I �V00 ANDREW V. ° ❑ ® '� �11� GIAMBERTONE II ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ \ & ASSOCIATES ' •ARCHITECTS• , I I I \ / O 0 ♦ ® `� I 62 Elm Street Huntington,NY 11743 ED mm : ® " , Jy \L 06i /I Telephone:631.367.0050 Fax:631.367.6636 O II I O I � 'i GiambertoneArchitects.com 1U7 ♦_ I The Enclaves I 56655 Route 25 I Southold,New York - -16.003 . I �/CX�-- 3 W-2121�2UissuedforPNunim�Re�rrn__ _� �/ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — _ D I I 1 w' I EE I ' Not For Construction �f IF I I _�u�vorcm,�Jn.•,rm,.,.u.ornc�am�•,a•\a id•v r Lower Level Plan I efc I Hotel Lower Level Floor Plan SCAM3,3z.-J'a,. A2.1 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 2017 1 4 1VING BOARD OF APPEALS �InSteven Bellone SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE Department of Economic Development and Planning Theresa Ward Division of Planning Commissioner and Environment February 22, 2017 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Attn: Leslie Weisman Dear Ms. Weisman: Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A14-14 thru A 14-25 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the following application submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impacts. A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Applicant Municipal File Number 56655 Main Road LLC (The Enclaves) * #7046�J�, *The Town should require that the applicant consult with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services to ensure compliance with applicable Sanitary Code requirements,and if appropriate advise the applicant of sources of transferable development rights (TDRs), and/or accepted innovative/alternative sanitary on-site wastewater treatment systems,that may be available in order to comply with Health Department and Groundwater Management Zone Standards. Very truly yours, Sarah Lansdale Director of Planning Theodore R. Klein Principal Planner TRK/cd H.LEE DENNISON BLDG 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HWY,11th FI ■ P.O.BOX 6100 ■ HAUPPAUGE,NY 11788-0099 (631)853-5191 1 / COUNTY OF SUFFOLK y Steven Bellone SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE Department of Economic Development and Planning Theresa Ward Division of Planning Deputy County Executive and Commissioner and Environment May 23, 2017 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals V'eCEVE® 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 �Ay Attn: Southold, oLesli Weisman �p an 959 ING BOPR®OF ppPEA�' N Dear Ms. Weisman: Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A14-14 thru A 14-25 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the following application submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impacts. A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Applicant Municipal File Number 56655 Main Road LLC (The Enclaves) * #7046-Amended 5 *The Town should require that the applicant consult with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services to ensure compliance with applicable Sanitary Code requirements,and if appropriate advise the applicant of sources of transferable development rights (TDRs), and/or accepted innovative/alternative sanitary on-site wastewater treatment systems that may be available in order to comply with Health Department and Groundwater Management Zone Standards. Very truly yours, Sarah Lansdale Director of Planning Theodore R. Klein Principal Planner TRK/cd H.LEE DENNISON BLDG 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HWY,11th FI ■ P.O.BOX 6100 0 HAUPPAUGE,NY 11788-0099■ (631)853-5191 ANDREW V. GIAMBERTONF & ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECT, TRADITIONAL BUILDING DESIGN 62 ELM ST. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL HUNTINGTON,NEW YORK 11743 TEL-(631)367-0050•FAX.(631)367-6636 DATE: April 13,2017 (PG.1) ATTN. ZBA TO' Town of Southold Board of Appeals JOB# 16-003 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 RE: ZBA Approval Submission Southold,NY 11971 56655 Rte. 25—Southold Qrtm•Nn 1 Mfl_Aq_fl�_15 WE ARE SENDING YOU: ❑Attached ❑The items listed below, under separate cover via ❑Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑Samples ❑Specifications ❑Copy of letter ❑Change order ❑ VIA Hand Delivery TRACKING#: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 9 04/13/2017 - Letter to ZBA-Narrative 9 04/13/2017 - Permit Application 9 04/13/2017 - Project Description 9 04/13/2017 - Questionnaire 9 - - Copies of C.O. &Deed 9 04/13/2017 - Agricultural Data Statement D �. 9 04/13/2017 - Long EAF Form D 9 04/13/2017 - Owner's Consent(Authorization) ��1� 9 04/13/2017 - Transactional Disclosure(Owner&Agent) 9 04/13/2017 - LWRP --------------- THESE THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below ❑ For approval ❑ Reviewed&Approved ❑ Resubmit _copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑Approved As Noted ❑Submit _copies for distribution ❑As requested ❑Returned For Correction ❑Return _corrected prints ❑For review and comment ❑Rejected ❑Prints returned after loan to us ❑ Forbids due ❑ REMARKS To Whom It May Concern: Attached please find our submission for ZBA approval. Thank You. COPY TO file SIGNED. Ernesto Silva If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. ANAREW V. GIAMBERTONF & ASSOCIATES RCHITECT T. TRADITIONAL BUILDING DESIGN 62 ELM ST. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL HUNTINGTON,NEW YORK 11743 TEL:(631)367-0050•FAX:(631)367-6636 DATE April 13,2017 (PG.2) ATTN. ZBA To. Town of Southold Board of Appeals JOB# 16-003 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 RE. ZBA Approval Submission Southold,NY 11971 56655 Rte. 25—Southold Crtm•Nn 1 flfltl_h2_(12_1 5 WE ARE SENDING YOU. ❑Attached ❑The items listed below, under separate cover via ❑Shop drawings ❑Prints ❑ Plans ❑Samples ❑Specifications ❑Copy of letter ❑Change order ❑ VIA: Hand Delivery TRACKING#. COPIES DATE NO DESCRIPTION 9 - Town Property Card 9 01/31/2017 - Photos(Existing Structures photos & Stake-out photos) 9 Hotel Elevation Rendering 9 07/08/2016 - Existing Surveys 9 04/11/2017 - C-001,002,100,200,300,301,400,500,600,601 -Site Plan 9 04/13/2017 A2.1-A2.4 Proposed Hotel Floor Plans&Roof Plan 9 04/13/2017 A2.5-A2.8 Proposed Restaurant Floor Plans &Roof Plan 9 04/13/2017 A3.1-A3.2 Proposed Restaurant Floor Plans 9 04/13/2017 A3.5-A3.8 Existing/Proposed Restaurant House Elevations THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below- ' ❑For approval ❑ Reviewed&Approved ❑Resubmit _copies for approval ❑For your use ❑Approved As Noted ❑Submit _copies for distribution ❑As requested ❑ Returned For Correction ❑ Return _corrected prints ❑For review and comment ❑ Rejected ❑ Prints returned after loan to us ❑For bids due ❑ REMARKS. COPYTO• file SIGNED- Ernesto Silva If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once N t' (c r" PR 18 April 13, 2017 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Kith Fuentes Re: Special Exception for the Enclaves 56655 Main Rd, Southold NY SCTM No. 1000-63-3-15 Dear Ms. Fuentes, Pursuant to your request I have prepared the following Narrative of the Project we are submitting to the Zoning Board, known as the Enclaves. The Enclaves will be located at 56655 Main Rd, Southold. It is located on a 6.75 Acre parcel of land located within the Hainlet Business District. The concept is to incorporate the existing home on the site, formerly known as the "Hedges" Bed and Breakfast, to function as the restaurant component to the project. In addition, the new Hotel will be set beyond dense hedge row and a nearly 1 acre meadow, making it virtually invisible to the street as well as the restaurant. The L-shaped Building will consist of 40 individual Hotel rooms, each one under 600 SF, as well as 4 individual approximately 600 SF cottages at the far Northern end of the property. Between these two structures will be an enclosed "Courtyard"where the pool and lounging areas will take place. All activities (pool, courtyard and parking areas) will be located facing the Property to the West (a Commercial Boatyard) as well as the property to the North (the LIRR Tracks). The building itself will act as a buffer to the 3 neighboring properties to the East. The project is fully compliant in all respects to the Current Zoning Requirements for a Hamlet Business district, yet due to its (permitted) use in this Zoning District, requires a "Special Exemption" from the ZBA, hence our application relative to the Zoning Criteria I offer: 62 Eini Street, HLintingtan, NY 11743 0 Tel; (631) 367-0050 o 6a)4 (631)3067-6636 a AVG@GlainbertoneArchitet:ts.com J RECEIVED Town of Southold SPR 2017 9 90 / Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS • Minimum Property size required for this use: 5 Acres (Actual Property size: 6.75 Acres) • Allowable Number of units for a property without Public Sewers: One Unit/6,000 SF of Land (Number of units permitted: 294,202 SF Property/6000 sf= 49 Hotel units allowed)- Please note we are applying for 44 units • Maximum size of each Unit: 600 SF (Actual size of each unit proposed: 545 SF) • In addition, there shall be no music, entertainment or Loudspeaker system that shall be audible from beyond the property line (This shall be accomplished through careful design and directing of the Sound systems as well as significant dense evergreen planting at the perimeter of the property) Should you have any additional questions or Comments,please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience. mccrely, 0 An rev V. Gram ertone President AVQ@Qxiambertonearchitects.co 62 Urn Street, Huntington, NY 1:1.743 Tel: (631)367-0050 O Fax(631) 353-6636 ; AVG @Giatnbertone rchitects.co.9i RECETVED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APR R 8' 2017 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK. Phone(631)765-1809 (631)765-9064 BONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION Application No. Date Filed: TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK: Applicant(s), Andrew Y. Giambertone of Parcel Location: House No. 56655 Street Main Road ( Route 25 ) Hamlet 5outhold Contact phone numbers: (631) 36-1-0050 SCTM-1000 Section 63 Block 03 Lot(s) 15 Lot Size 615 Zone District .HB AGRE5 hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance with the ZONING ORDINANCE,ARTICLE X ,SECTION 280-45,SUBSECTION 8 (2) for the following uses and purposes: Hotel as shown on the attached survey/site plan drawn to scale.Site Plan review[X] IS or[ ] IS NOT required. A. Statement of Ownership and Interest: 56655 Main 5t. LLC, e% Jonathan Tibett is(are)the owner(s)of property known and referred to as 56655 Main Road ( Route 25 ) ,Southold (Howse No., Street Hamlet) identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 63 ,Block 03 ,Lot 15 ,and shown on the attached deed. The above-described property was acquired by the owner on August 21,2015 B. The applicant alleges that the approval of this exception would be in harmony with the intent and purpose of said zoning ordinance and that the proposed use conforms to the standards prescribed therefore in said ordinance and would not be detrimental to property or persons in the neighborhood for the following reasons: (HB) C. The property which is subject of this application is zoned Hamlet Business and [X]is consistent with the use(s)described in the CO(attach copy),or [ )is not consistent 'th the CO being furnished herewith for the following reason(s): [ ] is vacant land. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ss.. STATE OF NEW YORK) n� g Signature) Sworn to before me this �S day of gfAAk ,20 (Not ry Public) Rita Aa Lep, Notary Public-State of New York . No.01 LE 6075039 Suftotk County My Commission Expires May 27aa 8 I RECEIVED ^ U-b APR 19 2017 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Phone(631)765-1809 (631)765-9064 APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION Application No. Date Filed: Page 2 General Standards,please answer the following as it pertains to your project: A. The use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts BECAUSE: The proposed use of the property Is In compliance with the allowable use In the Hamlet Business District as per Southold Code. The use of property will be contained to the property itself,adequate screen planting velli be provided to screen neighboring properties,therefore not effecting the adjacent properties. B. The use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the district wherein the requested use is located or of permitted or legally established uses in adjacent use districts BECAUSE: The proposed use of the property is in compliance with the allowable use in the Hamlet Business District as per Southold Code. C. The safety, the health, the welfare, the comfort, the convenience or the order of the town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location BECAUSE: All activity related to the proposed project will be contained within the property,and the use of the proposed project Is In compliance and character of the town therefore not adversely affecting the town. D. The use will be in harmony with-and promote-the general purposes and intent of Chapter- 280-142 BECAUSE The proposed use of the property Is in compliance with the allowable use in the Hamlet Business District as per Southold Code. E. The use will be compatible with its surroundings and with the character of the neighborhood and of the community in general, particularly with regard to visibility, scale and overall appearance BECAUSE: The proposal consists of keeping the existing residence which is the most prominent and visible structure of the project. As this Is an existing structure It doesn't change the visibility,scale and overall appearance as It relates to the neighborhood. F. All proposed strictures, equipment, and material shall be readily accessible for fire and police protection BECAUSE: The proposal is to have two separate access entrances off Main Road which will facilitate accessibility by both fire and police protection. G. The proposal shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 236, Stonnwater Management BECAUSE: The applicant will submit a Storm Water Management Control Ian for the approval by the Town of Southold,prior to the commencement of construction. - rc RECEIVED APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION APR 18 2097 (For ZBA Reference) `� ®l�� ZONING BOARD OF AfjPEAl.f6 Applicant: Andrew V. Glambertone Date Prepared: April 15,201.7 r�L/ I. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: Existing 8'-q" x04' shed. II. New Construction Areas (New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: Dimensions of new second floor: 5EE PLAN5 Dimensions of floor above second level: ATT,4r.NF1') N1=RE Teo Height(from finished ground to top of ridge): Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes, please provide height(above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: III. Proposed Construction Description (Alterations oi-Structural Changes) (attach extra sheet if necessary)- Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: 2 Story single family residence. Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: 2 Story structure to house a restaurant with a 74 seat capacitit A proposed addition connecting the footprint of an existing shed and the existing house structure. IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage (from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: 5,6118.61 sq.ft. Proposed increase of building coverage: 8.55% Square footage of your lot: 2114,202 sq.ft. Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: q22 % V. Purpose of New Construction: 2 Story hotel,pool,and It's required parking. VI. Please describe the land contours (flat, slope %,heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): Existing contours von4 from el. 52 at rear of proeerty to el. 26 at front of property. Southern part of the site consists of the existing house, uthiliclings,and landscape areas. North of the house anndrtand5caPezi ar —proper-ty-North-of.—the-houseAs-wood land. Please submit seven (7) photos, labeled to show different angles of yard areas after stalcing corners for new construction), and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 7/2002; 2/2005; 1/2007 r (RECEIVED {{{ APR 18 2017 Cjv QUESTIONNAIRE SPECIAL EXCEPTION ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION 1. Has a determination been made regarding Site Plan review?__Yes x No If no, please inquiry with the ZBA office and if site plan is required,you may apply to the Planning Dept. at the same time so both applications can be reviewed concurrently. 2. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? Minor Changes proposed to create flat a. _ No X Yes please explain on attached sheet.pool terrace area see attached site plan., 3. Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? No a. 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? b. 3.)Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? c. 4.)If your property contains wetlands or pond areas,have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the trustees: and if issued,please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. 4. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? No 5. Are there any patios,concrete barriers,bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting? None Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. 6. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? None If yes,please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: 7. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking,please apply to the Building Department to obtain copies of them. S. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? No If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. 9. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel Existing single family residence with garage,an ed. and the proposed use Restaurant, In existing structure. New 2 stor h tel. (ex existing single family,proposed same with ee,pool or of er or v cant proposed ofd a with apartments above,etc) C_ Authorized signa ure and Date ID--8195017-031 ABS'T'RACTERS' INFORMATION SERVICE A. I l i l MARCUS AVE,SUITE MZ214 LAKE SUCCESS NY 11042 ` ti�r�{• PHONE'(516)918.4600 FAX-(516)918.4540 .e CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY El Prepared For:First American Title County:SUFFOLK TITLE N0.0260-3014736405 DATE:6/10/2015 RECEIVED PRENUSES:56655 ROUTE 25, SOUTHOLD IPPR 18 N17 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DISTRICT: 1000 SECTION:063.00 BLOCK:03.00 LOT:015.000 ONING BOARD OF APKALS SEC: 063.00 BLOCK: 03.00 LOT: 015.000 A SEARCH OF THE RECORDS CONDUCTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS REVEALS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: CO# Z13486 DATED: 05/31/1985 ONE FAMILY DWELLING WITH TWO ATTACHED PORCHES, THREE ACCESSORY SHEDS, GARAGE, WELL, BED AND BREAKFAST. i a l t VVIPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT SEARCH INFORMATION ABOVE I DATA TRACE VU0231ATION SWIM LLC OISCLAlNS X%'V L\ro ALL LIAMLRY TD XNV 7EASOY OR V-7FFT FOR TUX FROM SLLOR.ILUYL OF SUcma RLFLLCIm mr CD%yfi70. j OF TRIS TO REAL PROPERTY.TTIL SMICE3 ARE PROTTOED'AS IS•MITROrT IVARRACTI'OF ACV 1.100,EMMA L[T}►3TFD OR MWEk TCl1 MM-WTTTIOT:t MMATIOC ANY WARRACTM OF IIERCIUMAOILM OR nI.SM FOR A PARIICELAR PMOSE.OR WAR"ITM BASED OC COME OF OEALLCC OR MCI L\TRADE OR LRRORS OR O%tLWQN%LLSLT.TLCO FROST NLCLICLNCL Tms IS NOT AC MUM SLRCICL TOO DUCL UMER SLTERSEDES ALL PRIOR ACD CO%T0IPORAnOL1 LN'DERstAtOL}CS.TIM SLRITCES AAL TXCLCMILY FOR FN.-A-n4-.TRU A.%b CDT FOR TIM DLCTJrT Of ACV TTTOID PARTML 1 i WgVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APR 18 P���� / OFFICE OF BUILDING INS PLCTO R TOWN ILALL ZONING 130ARD Op App8AL§ EOUTHOLD, NEW YORK CER'T'IFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NO\CONFORAUNG PPERUSES THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the 1X! Land Pre C.O. I- 213466 �/ Building(s) Date- May 31 , 1985 ffi,/ Uce,..) located at 56655 Hain Road Southold - Street Hamlet shown on County tax map as District 1000, Section 063 , Block 03 Lot 015does{not)onform to the present Building Zone Code of the Town of Southold for the fallowing reasons: _ t6a duelling is non-conformin • there is insufficient front yard. There is a Are-existing nonconforming Bed b Breakfast I 1 On the basis of information presented to the Building Inspector's Office, it has been determined that the above nonconforming 7C/Land (X-/BuIlding(s) i 1 /Use(s) existed on the effective date the present Building Zone Code of the Town of Southold, and may be continued pursuant to and subject to the appli- cable provisions of said Code. IT IS FURTHER CERTIFIED that, based upon information presented to the Building Inspector's Office, the occupancy and use for which this Certifl- Cate is issued is as follows: property contains a two-story wood framed ' one-family dwelling with two attached porcbee. Property also has three accessory sheds; an accessory garage; and an ornamental well. Property situated in a-1 Zone. The Certificate is issued to WILLIAM G. & BARBARA 0. ALBERTSOR (owner, leasee-ar-tenant) of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval • not required s UNDERINRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. _ _ not rtquired NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the owner of the above premises HAS NOT CONSENTED TO AN INSPECTION of the premises by the Building Inspec- tor to determine if the premises comply with all applicable codes and ordin- ances, other than the Building Zone Code, and therefore, no such inspection has been conducted. This Certificate, therefore, does not, and is not intended to certify that the premises comply with all other applicable codes and regula- tions. t s _ J Bul:di:nZ inspector i f s NY Om-Bzgaln aad Selo reed with Cava=t asalast Orartor'a Acs Irativldwl or owp%wion(Slasla Sheet)(NYBTV SOM) � CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORESIGNMG 71M tNSrRUhtWr-THIS INSTRUNLIMSHOULD BE USED BY 1AWYERS ONLY RECEIVED C,`, f THIS INDENTURE,made the JS day of ��),—v In the year 2015 APR n 8 209 BETWEEN Rita Costello Cohen,individually and as specific devisee of the last will and testament of ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Albert Cohen,deceased 56655 Route 25 Southold,NY 11971 party of the first part,and 56655 Main St LLC,a New York Limited Liability Company 20 Stony Hili Path Smithtown,NY 11787 party of the second pan, WITNESSETH,that the party of the first pari,inconsideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part,docs hereby grant and rcleaso unto the party of the second part,the heirs orsaccesson and assigns of the party of the second part foreva. ALL that certain plot,piece or parcel of land,with the buildings and Improvements thereon erected,situate,lying and being in the SEE SCHEDULE A ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE PART HEREOF. t BEING AND INTENDED TO BE the same premises conveyed to Albert Cohen and Rita Costello Cohen by deed dated June 13,1985 and recorded on June 28,1985 in Liber 9821 Cp 9 In the Suffolk County Clerk's Office. a TOGETHER with all right,tide and interest,if any,of the party of the first partof,in and to any structs and roads abutting the above-described premises to the cents lines thereof,TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the patty or the first part in and to said premises;TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the srcand pan,the heirs or successors and asslgns of the party of the second pan forever. I AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been Incumbered In any way whatever,except as aforesaid. I AND the party of the first part,in compliance with Section 13 of the Llen Law,covenants that the party of the fiat part will receive the consideration for this conveytuue and will hold the right to receive such consideration as a trust fund to be applied tint for the purpose of paying the cost of the Improvement and will apply the some first to the payment of the cost of the Improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word"party"shall be construed as if it read"parties"whenever the sense of this Indenture so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the party of the first part his duly exec/utted this deed the �day_and year first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: Ivostello Cohen r USSACQvMySDGuENTF0RuBscowwrmNNswYow mrsOnLr. Usent7,7VOwrWG1TNTFORusstOwivruwNswYOrt mYEONLr.• state ofNcyYork,County of Suffolk )ss.: state orNewYork county or }ss: unthe- day of J�1{}f' In the year 2015 On th. day of in the year (/f� 5 bef°re tnw�unduslg�d,P��Y aPP�d before me,the undersignr_d,personally appeared Rita Costello Cohen RECEIVE,) personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory pesonally known to me or ved to me on the basis of satisfactory cvrdence to be the individua!(a)whose namc(s)is(am)subscribed to the evidence to be the individuaS�wtmse name(s)Is(arc)subscribed to the within btstrummu and 4:lmowied4ed to me that hehhe/they executed within Instrument and acknowledged to me that hdshrhhey executed the same In hMmrhheir capauty(la). and that try hisilstrhh.Ir the name In hisfherltheir capacityC=). and that by hlslhedheir �� �9 7097 signatttrc(s)on the Instrument,the Individual(s),or the person upon 9ignaturt(s)on the inswment,the individual(s),or the person upon behalf of which the(ndivldual(s)acted ted the instrument- behalf of which the individusl(s acted,executed the instrument. 0 Q ) Z®1VIIVG B THERESA LAPORTE 0ARI0FAPpErgLS N01MPublic, Stat)9B law tNotary Public No.Qualified to Suffolk County Commission Expires November 2.20 ACAv01nEDr 1EWFORMFORUSEWI'Ff11NNmvYoRKsrAISONLP: AGCY01VL&DGMENrF6wSrFORUSEOrlrms!VmvYoimSTATEONLN • (New rortSaburfUjt wlmeu Arlt owledjme+w Ceri(/kmel (Ow of or Foreign Generol Mmawfedl,xent Cerrljncoul ...... 1 ' State of New York,Countyot }is.: ,,.)ss.: a (Cmr pin venae whh Sorts.Country,Prvrh+aorMunlclpalhrl On the day of in the year before me,the undersigned,personally appeared On the day of In the year before me,the undenigned,personally appeared the subscribing witness to the faregomg Instrumem,with whom I am pcnomally acquainted,who,being by me duty swom,did depose and persoaatly known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory say that helshettky reside(s)in evidence to be the individual(B)whose aame(a)Is(cue)subscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged to me that beanddwy executed ((fthe place oJresltience!s In a city,include thesireer andstreet number, the same In his(hedtlick eaputryty((r''es),that by his/her/their signamWs) (Jany,therrof);that Itchhefthey know(s) an the InM=nt,the Individuat(s),or the person upon behalf of which ; the inehviduil(s)Acted,exccuted the instsumcnt,and that such individual to be the Individual described In and who executed the foregoing made such appeuance before the undersigned in the Instrument;that said subscribing witness was present and saw said execute the same;and that said witness at the some time subscribed (Iruerrrhe eiryorotherhlcrtsub&Lrlonandthestateorcountryor i hisftm*helr names)as a witness thereto. other pias rhe acknowledgment was taken). ! 1 BARGAIN&SALE Dxm Tins Dwnucr 1000 SEMON 063.00 Rita Costello Cohen BLOCK 03.00 Lar 015.000 ; TO COUN7YORTaWN Suffolk 56655 Motu St LLC RECORDEDATAEQUESTOF Fidelity Nauonai Title Insurance Company REMNJI MAMTO rrY NATIONAL TrrLE Diana C.Prevete,Esq. INSURANCE COMPANY Albanese&Albanese LLP ; 1050 Franklin Avenue +...,:.aaG Fidelity a3�,r„.„y - LEFiDzL Garden City,NY 11530 r m E cca V ' W a a W o s< W v a a� Q i ,1 Jt F,g ,pO jECINE" R �l 7017 =V.-- � ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Title No.3019-736405 SCHEDULE "A" ALL THAT CERTAIN PLOT, PIECE OR PARCEL OF LAND,SITUATE, LYING AND BEING IN SOUTHOLD,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,COUNTY OF SUFFOLK,STATE OF NEW YORK, BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS,- BEGINNING OLLOWS:BEGINNING:ATA POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF MAIN ROAD AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LAND OF SCOPAZ AND THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE PREMISES HEREIN DESCRIBED; RUNNING THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF MAIN ROAD,SOUTH 840 04'50"WEST, 191.30 FEETTO LAND FORMERLY OF MILOVICH, NOW OR FORMERLY OF PIETRODANGELO; THENCE ALONG SAID LAND FORMERLY OF MILOVICH, NOW OR FORMERLY OF PIETRODANGELO TWO COURSES: (1)ARTH 4°45' 20"WEST, 178.0 FEET, (2)SOUTH 85° 14'40"WEST, 103.0 FEET TO LAND OF GOMEZ; THENCE ALONG SAID LAND OF GOMEZ,SOUTH 670 58'50"WEST, 90.10 FEET TO LAND OF ALBERT W. ALBERTSON; THENCE ALONG SAID LAND OF ALBERT W.ALBERTSON,THREE COURSES: € (1)NORTH 5°30'50"WEST, 616.57 FEET; (2)SOUTH 71°22'40"WEST, 59.72 FEET; (3)NORTH 5°30' 50"WEST, 51.34 FEET TO LAND OF LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY; THENCE ALONG SAID LAND OF LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY, NORTH 71°22'40"EAST, 415.71 FEETTO LAND OF EAST ISLANDER HOMES,INC.AND LAND OF DOLOMITE AND ZUSTOVICH; THENCE ALONG SAID LAND AT EAST ISLANDER HOMES,INC.,AND LAND OF DOLOMITE AND ZUSTOVICH, SOUTH 70 38' 10"EAST,622.78 FEET TO SAID LAND OF SCOPAZ; THENCE ALONG SAID LAND OF SCOPAZ, SOUTH 7-44'40"EAST,310.00 FEET TO THE POINT OR PLACE OF BEGINNING. THE policy to be Issued under this report will Insure the title to such buildings and Improvements erected on the premises,which by law constitute real property. FOR CONVEYANCING ONLY:TOGETHER with all the right,title and Interest of the party of the first part,of in and to the land lying In the street In front of and adjoining said premises. i • I -- RECEIVED S6 AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT APR I a 2gg ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS WHEN 7`O USE THIS FORM: The foruz must be completed by the applicant for ally special use permit,site plan approval, use variduce, or subdivision approval on pro1wr j,within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement fuusi be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance ivith sections 239-- in 39=nr a'td 239-n of the General Municipal Law. 1)Name of Applicant: Andrew V. 61ambertone 2)Address of Applicant: 62 Elm 5t. Huntington, NY 11.743 3)Name of Land'Owtier(if other than applicant) : 56655 main 5t. LLC, c% Jonathan Tibott 4)Address of Land Owner: 20 Stony Hill Path,Smithtown NY 11151-1137 5)Description of Pfopbsed Project:'Converting existing single family residence Into.a restaurant. Constructing new'2 story hotel with outdoor pool area and•required parking.' 6)Location of Property(road and tax map numbor): 56655 Main Road (Route 25) 507M#:1000493-03-15 7)Is the parcel within an agricultural district? V1 No ❑Yes If yes,Agricultural District Number . 8)Is this parcel'actively farmed?.E No ❑Yes 9) Name and address of any ow ner(s).of land within the agricultural district containing active faun operation(s)'located 500 feet of the boundary of the prop6sed project. (Information may be available through the Town Assessors Office,,Town Fall location (765-1937) or from any public computer at the Town Hall locations by viewing the parcel numbers on the Town of Southold Real Property Tax System. Name and Address - 2. - 3. 4. 5 6. (Please use back side of page if more than six property owners are identified.) T11p lot numbers nay be obtained,in advance,when requested fi-otn the Office of the Planning Board at 765-' 19 8 the Z oard of ppeal at 765-1809. 1411??1 (-7- Signature o icant Date Note: 1.The local board will solicit comments from lie owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation.Solicitation will be in e by supplying a copy of this statement. 2. Comments returned to the local board will be taken into consideratiop as part of the overall review of this application. 3. The clerk to the local board is responsible for sending copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement to the property owners identified above.The cost for mailing shall be paid by the applicant at the time the application is submitted for review.Failure to pay at such time means the application is not complete and cannot be acted upon by the board. I-14-09 RECEIVED F Environmental Assessment Form Part I -Project and Setting APR 18 617 Instructions for Completing Part 1 ZONING BARD OF APPEALS / -7"0y4, S� Part l is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or finding, are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor;and,when possible,generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to Update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A& B. In Sections C,D&E,most items contain an initial question that must be answered either"Yes"or"No". If the answer to the initial question is"Yes",complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer-to the initial question is"No",proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part I is accurate and complete. A. Project and Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: The Enclaves Project Location(describe, and attach a general location map): 56655 Main Road(Route 25),Southold Brief Description of Proposed Action(include purpose or need): Converting existing single family residence into a restaurant.Constructing new 2 story hotel with outdoor pool area and required parking New project will completely comply with all zoning regulations and be situated such that no music,entertainment or loudspeaker system will be audible beyond the property Innes Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone-(631)367-0050 Andrew V.Giambertone E-Mail: avg@giambertonearchitects con Address:62 Elm St. City/PO:Huntington State:NY Zip Code:11743 Project Contact(if not same as sponsor;give name and title/role): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO- State: Zip Code. Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone. (516)997-6190 56655 Main Road c/o Jonathan Tibett E-Mail: Address: 185 Willow Point Road City/PO: Southold State: NY Zip Code:11971 Page 1 of 13 B.Government Approvals B.Government Approvals,Funding,or Sponsorship. ("Funding"includes grants, loans,tax relief,and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or protected) a. City Council,Town Board, ❑Yes®No or Village Board of Trustees b City,Town or Village ®Yes❑No Town of Southold Planning Board RE WED Planning Board or Commission c. City,Council,Town or 5ZYeS❑N0 Town of Southold ZBA APR R 8 2017 Village Zoning Board of Appeals d.Other local agencies ❑Yes0No ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS e. County agencies ®Yes❑No SCDHS,SCWA,SCSA f. Regional agencies ❑YesoNo g. State agencies 5ZYes❑No NY State Dept of Transportation,NY DEC h.Federal agencies ❑Yes®No i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area,or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? ®Yes❑No ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? ®Yes❑No tit. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? ❑YesONo C. Planning and Zoning C.I.Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption,or amendment of a plan,local law,ordinance,rule or regulation be the ❑Yes®No only approval(s)which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • If Yes,complete sections C,F and G. • If No,proceed to question C 2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part I C.2.Adopted land use plans. a Do any municipally-adopted (city,town,village or county)comprehensive land use plan(s)include the site ®Yes❑No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes,does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action ®Yes❑No would be located? b.Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district(for example: Greenway ®Yes❑No Brownfield Opportunity Area(BOA),designated State or Federal heritage area;watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s)- NYS Heritage Areas U North Shore Heritage Area c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, ❑Yes®No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes, identify the plan(s): Page 2 of 13 C.3. Zoning e a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. ®Yes❑No If Yes,what is the zoning classification(s)including any applicable overlay district? b. Is the use pennitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ®Yes❑No c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? ❑Yes®No If Yes, i What is the proposed new zoning for the site? CA. Existing community services. a. In what school district is the project site located?Southold b.What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? T1 B ZOO Southold Town Police c.Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? �b Southold Fire Department d.What parks serve the project site? Southold Park,Founders Landing Park,Hortons Point,South Harbor,Triangle Park D.Project Details D.I. Proposed and Potential Development a. What is the general nature of the proposed action(e.g.,residential, industrial,commercial,recreational;if mixed,include all components)? b.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 6.75 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 5.92 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 6.75 acres c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? ❑Yes®No i If Yes,what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units(e.g.,acres,miles,housing units, square feet)? % Units: d.Is the proposed action a subdivision,or does it include a subdivision? ❑Yes®No If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision?(e.g.,residential, industrial,commercial,if mixed,specify types) ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? ❑Yes❑No iii. Number of lots proposed? iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum Maximum e. Will proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? ❑Yes®No i. If No,anticipated period of construction: months ii If Yes: • Total number of phases anticipated • Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) month year • Anticipated completion date of final phase month _wear • Generally describe connections or relationships among phases,including any contingencies where progress of one phase may detennine timing or duration of future phases- Page 3 of 13 f.Does the project include new residential us'- ❑Yes®No If Yes,show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family(fount Initial Phase At completion APR 20V ,�1/„ C of all phases g.Does the proposed action include new non-residential constriction(including expansions)? ®Yes❑No If Yes, i. Total number of structures 5 ii Dimensions(in feet)of largest proposed structure: 33 92 height; 78&72 width; and 270&205 length in. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: 61,200 square feet h.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in thevnpoundment of any ®Yes❑No liquids,such as creation of a water supply,reservoir,pond, lake,waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: h If a water impoundment,the principal source of the water: ❑ Ground water❑Surface water streams 00ther specify: Municipal Water hi If other than water,identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. iv Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: 41,546 Mian gallons; surface area- .06 acres v Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure. height; length vi Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure(e.g.,earth fill,rock,wood,concrete). Earth fill bentonite clay liner. D.2. Project Operations a. Does the proposed action include any excavation,mining,or dredging,during construction,operations,or both? ❑Yes❑✓No (Not including general site preparation,grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i.What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? ii. How much material(including rock,earth,sediments,etc.)is proposed to be removed from the site? • Volume(specify tons or cubic yards): • Over what duration of time? di Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged,and plans to use,manage or dispose of them. iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? ❑Yes❑No If yes,describe. v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? acres vi What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? acres vii What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? ❑Yes❑No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of,or encroachment ❑Yes®No into any existing wetland,waterbody,shoreline,beach or adjacent area? If Yes: L Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected(by name,water index number,wetland map number or geographic description): Page 4 of 13 ii Describe how the proposed action would ct that waterbody or wetland,e.g.excavation placement of structures,or alteration of channels,banks and shorelin: .ndicate extent of activities,alterations and ac.—...-ns in square feet or acres: APTA 0 U Jl iii Will proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? ❑Yes[:]No If Yes,describe: ZONING BOARD OF APPFALS iv Will proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? ❑Yes❑No If Yes• • acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: • expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion: • purpose of proposed removal(e g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): • proposed method of plant removal: • if chemical herbicide treatment will be used,specify product(s): v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance. c.Will the proposed action use,or create a new demand for water? ®Yes❑No If Yes: i Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: gallons/day ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? RlYes❑No If Yes: • Name of district or service area: • Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? [0 Yes❑No • Is the project site in the existing district? 21 Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes®No • Do existing lines serve the project site? ®Yes❑No irr. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? ❑Yes ONo If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: • Source(s)of supply for the district: iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? ❑YesONo If,Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • Proposed source(s)of supply for new district- 1, If a public water supply will not be used,describe plans to provide water supply for the project- vi. If water supply will be from wells(public or private),maximum pumping capacity: gallons/minute. d Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? ®Yes❑No If Yes: i Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: 11,500 gallons/day ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated(e.g.,sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): iii Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? ❑Yes®No If Yes: • Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: • Name of district: • Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No • Is the project site in the existing district? ❑Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes❑No Page 5 of 13 • Do existing sewer lines serve the prc ;ite9 ❑Yes❑No • Will line extension within an existinl,•_...-rict be necessary to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No If Yes RECEIVED • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project. APR 2017-n I i iv. Will a new wastewater(sewage)treatment district be fonned to serve the project sitdONING BOARD OF APPEALS ❑Yes®No If Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge'? v If public facilities will not be used,describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water(name and classification if surface discharge,or describe subsurface disposal plans): On-site Biological Engineered Single Sludge Treatment System vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture,recycle or reuse liquid waste- e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create storniwater-runoff,either from new point ®Yes❑No sources(i.e. ditches,pipes,swales,curbs,gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater)or non-point source(i.e. sheet flow)during construction or post construction? If Yes: L How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? Square feet or 3 52 acres(impervious surface) Square feet or 6 75 acres(parcel size) ii Describe types of new point sources. iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed(i.e.on-site stormwater management facility/structures,adjacent properties, groundwater,on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? On-site stormwater management structures • If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: • Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? ❑Yes®No iv. Does proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces,use pervious materials or collect and re-use stonnwater? ®Yes❑No f. Does the proposed action include,or will it use on-site,one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel ❑Yes❑No combustion,waste incineration,or other processes or operations? If Yes,identify: i. Mobile sources during project operations(e.g.,heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) it. Stationary sources during construction(e.g.,power generation,structural heating,batch plant,crushers) iii Stationary sources during operations(e g.,process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f(above),require a NY State Air Registration,Air Facility Pennit, ❑Yes®No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet ❑Yes❑No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) it. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application,the project will generate. • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide(CO,) • Tons/year(short tons)of Nitrous Oxide(N20) • Tons/year(short tons)of Perfluorocarbon(PFCs) Tons/year(short tons)of Sulfur Hexafluoride(SF6) • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons(HFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Hazardous Air Pollutants(HAPs) Page 6 of 13 h.Will the proposed action generate or emit n; ane(including,but not limited to,sewage trea, t plants, ❑Yes®No landfills,composting facilities)? - - APR a 8 W7 If Yes- —7 ®q4, t. Estimate methane generation in tons/year(metric). ri.Describe any methane capture,control or elimination measures included in proje ., generate heat or electricity, flaring)- i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes,such as ❑Yes®No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions(e g,diesel exhaust,rock particulates/dust): j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial ❑Yes❑No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes. r When is the peak traffic expected(Check all that apply): ❑Morning ❑Evening []Weekend ❑Randomly between hours of to it For commercial activities only,projected number of semi-trailer truck trips/day- iii. Parking spaces: Existing Proposed Net increase/decrease n, Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? ❑Yes❑No v. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads,creation of new roads or change in existing access,describe: vi Are public/private transportation service(s)or facilities available within '/2 mile of the proposed site? ❑Yes❑No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid,electric ❑Yes❑No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii.Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing ❑Yes❑No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k Will the proposed action(for commercial or industrial projects only)generate new or additional demand ®Yes❑No for energy? If Yes: L Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: 1,140,552 KWH/YR. ii Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project(e.g.,on-site combustion,on-site renewable,via grid/local utility,or other): iii. Will the proposed action require a new,or an upgrade to,an existing substation? ❑Yesp]No 1. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i During Construction: u During Operations: • Monday,-Friday: 0 • Monday-Friday: 24 hrs. • Saturday- 0 • Saturday: 24 hrs • Sunday: 0 • Sunday: 24 hrs • Holidays: 0 • Holidays: 24 hrs Page 7 of 13 m.Will the proposed action produce noise that' exceed existing ambient noise levels durin , 7truction, ®Yes❑No operation,or both? --iVED If yes: i Provide details including'sources,time of day and duration: APR A 8 2077.7090 GUNING BOARD OF APPEALS � h. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? ❑Yes ONo Describe: n.. Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? ®Yes❑No If yes: i Describe source(s), location(s),height of fixture(s),direction/aim,and proximity to nearest occupied structures: n Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? ❑Yes®No Describe: o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? ❑Yes ONo If Yes,describe possible sources,potential fi-equency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: p. Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum (combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) ❑Yes®No or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: i. Product(s)to be stored ti. Volume(s) per unit time (e g.,month,year) in. Generally describe proposed storage facilities: q. Will the proposed action(commercial, industrial and recreational projects only)use pesticides(i.e.,herbicides, ❑Yes ONo insecticides)during construction or operation? If Yes: i Describe proposed treatment(s): u Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? ❑ Yes ❑No r.Will the proposed action(commercial or industrial projects only)involve or require the management or disposal ❑ Yes ®No of solid waste(excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i. Describe any solid waste(s)to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: • Construction: tons per (unit of time) • Operation : tons per (unit of time) n Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: • Construction: • Operation: in. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: • Construction: • Operation: Page 8 of 13 s.Does the proposed action include constructi' "r modification of a solid waste management, )ty? ❑ Yes 0 No If Yes. i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site(e.g.,recycling or transfer station,composting,landfill,or other disposal activities): RECEIVED n Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: • Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment,or APR A 8 2017 • Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment JV iii. If landfill,anticipated site life: years ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS t. Will proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation,treatment,storage,or disposal of hazardous ❑YesONo waste? If Yes: r Name(s)of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated,handled or managed at facility: n Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? ❑Yes No If Yes:provide name and location of facility: If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.I. Land uses on and surrounding the project site a.Existing land uses. i Check all uses that occur on,adjoining and near the project site. ❑ Urban ❑ Industrial 0 Commercial 0 Residential(suburban) ❑ Rural(non-farm) ❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other(specify): ii If mix of uses,generally describe. b.Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Current Acreage After Change Covertype Acreage Project Completion (Acres+/-) • Roads,buildings,and other paved or impervious 0 129 acres 2 87 acres +2.741 acres surfaces • Forested 0 0 0 • Meadows,grasslands or brushlands(non- agricultural, including abandoned agricultural) 5.9 acres 3.s7 acres -2.03 acres • Agricultural 0 0 0 (includes active orchards,field,greenhouse etc.) • Surface water features 0 0 0 (lakes,ponds,streams,rivers,etc.) • Wetlands(freshwater or tidal) 0 0 0 • Non-vegetated(bare rock,earth or fill) 0 0 0 • Other Describe: Page 9 of 13 c.Is the project site presently used by membe' the community for public recreation9 ❑Yes❑No i If Yes: explain. d.Are there any facilities serving children,the elderly,people with disabilities (e.g.,schools,hospitals, licensed , ❑Yes®No day care centers,or group homes)within 1500 feet of the project site? RECEIVED If Yes, 111 i Identify Facilities- APR 18 2057 ��Y ((� ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS e.Does the project site contain an existing dam? ❑Yes®No If Yes: i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: • Dam height: feet • Dam length: feet • Surface area: acres • Volume impounded. gallons OR acre-feet ii Dam's existing hazard classification: iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: f Has the project site ever been used as a municipal,commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, ❑Yes2No or does the project site adjoin property which is now,or was at one time,used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i. Has the facility been formally closed? ❑Yes❑ No • If yes,cite sources/documentation: ii Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: in. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: g.Have hazardous wastes been generated,treated and/or disposed of at the site,or does the project site adjoin ❑Yes®No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat,store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i Describe waste(s)handled and waste management activities,including approximate time when activities occurred: h Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site,or have any []Yes® No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site ❑Yes❑No Remediation database? Check all that apply: ❑ Yes—Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Yes—Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Neither database ii If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities,describe control measures. lit Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? ®Yes❑No If yes,provide DEC ID number(s):152218 iv If yes to(i),(ii) or(iii)above,describe current status of site(s): Page 10 of 13 v. Is the project site subject to an instituttoni" Nitrol limiting property uses? ❑YesONo • If yes,DEC site ID number. • Describe the type of institutional control (e.g.,deed restriction or easement). RECEIVED • Describe any use limitations. APR A 2017' • Describe any engineering controls: • Will the project affect the institutional or engmeering controls in place? ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ❑Yes❑No • Explain: E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? feet b.Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? ❑Yes©No If Yes,what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? % c. Predominant soil type(s)present on project site OL(Silts&Silty Clays) 10 % SP(Sands) 90 % d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average- 26 9 feet e Drainage status of project site soils:0 Well Drained: 90 %of site 0 Moderately Well Drained- 10%of site ❑ Poorly Drained %of site f.Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes 0 0-10%: 100 %of site ❑ 10-15%: %of site ❑ 15%or greater: %of site g.Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? ❑YesONo If Yes,describe: h. Surface water features. i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies(including streams,rivers, ❑YesONo ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? ❑YesONo If Yes to either i or ii,continue. If No,skip to E.2.i. hi Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, ❑Yes©No state or local agency? iv For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site,provide the following information: • Streams: Name Classification • Lakes or Ponds: Name Classification • Wetlands: Name Approximate Size • Wetland No.(if regulated by DEC) v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired El Yes®No waterbodies? If yes,name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: i. Is the project site in a designated Floodway? ❑Yes®No j. Is the project site in the 100 year Floodplain? ❑Yes®No k.Is the project site in the 500 year Floodplain? ❑Yes®No 1. Is the project site located over,or immediately adjoining,a primary,principal or sole source aquifer? ®Yes❑No If Yes: i Name of aquifer:Sole Source Aquifer Names-Nassau-Suffolk SSA Page 11 of 13 _ RECEIVED in. Identify the predominant wildlife species occupy or use the project site: Native Birds __ 118 2017 Rabbits Squirels ZONING n.Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? 17V esRJNo If Yes- i Describe the habitat/community(composition,function,and basis for designation): u Source(s) of description or evaluation: ni Extent of community/habitat: • Currently: acres • Following completion of project as proposed. acres • Gain or loss(indicate+or-): acres o Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as ❑YesONo endangered or threatened,or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare,or as a species of ❑YesONo special concern? q Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting,trapping,fishing or shell fishing? ❑Yes®No If yes,give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to ❑YesoNo Agriculture and Markets Law,Article 25-AA,Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number- b. ame/numberb.Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? ❑YesONo i If Yes: acreage(s)on project site? d. Source(s)of soil rating(s): c. Does the project site contain all or part of,or is it substantially contiguous to,a registered National ❑YesR]No Natural Landmark? If Yes: i Nature of the natural landmark: ❑Biological Community ❑ Geological Feature ii. Provide brief description of landmark,including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: d.Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? ❑Yes®No If Yes: i. CEA name: H Basis for designation: W. Designating agency and date: Page 12 of 13 e. Does the project site contain,or is it subst Ily contiguous to,a building,archaeological ',Dr district ❑YesO No Y which is listed on,or been nominated by U e NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on,the RECEIVEDC16 State or National Register of Historic Places? (Gl If Yes: APR � � �Q�� i Nature of historic/archaeological resource- EJ Archaeological Site ❑Historic Building or District h Name- hi Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS f. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for OYes❑No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory? g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s)or resources been identified on the project site? ❑YesONo If Yes: i. Describe possible resource(s)- ii Basis for identification- h.Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal,state,or local ❑Yes®No scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i Identify resource: ii. Nature of,or basis for,designation(e.g.,established highway overlook,state or local park,state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): iii. Distance between project and resource: miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers ❑YesONo Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i Identify the name of the rives-and its designation: ii Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? ❑Yes❑No F. Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal,please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/S n Name Andr w V.Giambertone Date 04/13/2017 Signature Title .���j PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 EAF Mapper Summary Rep',--.,-,' Tues__ Jy, April 11, 2017 3:14 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental a }= assessment form(EAF) Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper Additional information on any EAF y' question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks Although 10 the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to 0 DEC,you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order AV to obtain data not provided by the Mapper Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations f'a ' r3t9�e)::e rfe16r1 t13a3 :7 'SOU Tiold {a3 y T7ttnt�A �J flaiih�tC ,S�st�n Sou ea:Esri,PERE,i:,'sLcrrns,USGS, Intr-zmap, IRCRENIEEXT F,NRC-En,EsrikP .tapan, .-IETI,EasriCibine Ifi;ng t<cng�,Esri � E, _ .:._ Pit9:hursrs 5�r�cs;,. r�, Kcmea, Esri(Thalisnd),r;is�irylzdia;f;��f, Gctunhuc, " r�If'tY����I 4:; Int_—rnap, ,ppsn se=_t9clsn centyibutffs,aha the 8IS_ c; I r u��EPv9Et:T F,T3R an.tri ase '.ummasnitp i isct�tvtt yya Piafl,JlETl,SBriChinsIHcng, B.i.l [Coastal or Waterfront Area] Yes B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] Yes C.2.b. [Special Planning District] Yes - Digital mapping data are not available for all Special Planning Districts. Refer to EAF Workbook. C.2.b. [Special Planning District- Name] NYS Heritage Areas:Ll North Shore Heritage Area E.1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site- Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete Refer to EAF Potential Contamination History] Workbook. E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Listed] Workbook. E.1 h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete Refer to EAF Environmental Site Remediation Database] Workbook. ��� J E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000'of DEC Remediation Yes ''(,V/ J Site] RECEIVED E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000'of DEC Remediation 152218 APR 2Q97 Site - DEC ID] E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features] No Z®NING BOARD OF ra6'P6-AL§ E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features] No E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features] No E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features] No E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies] No E.2.i. [Floodway] No E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain] No E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain] No E.2.1. [Aquifers] Yes E.2.1. [Aquifer Names] Sole Source Aquifer Names:Nassau-Suffolk SSA Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF MaDDer Summary Reoort �.c.ii. Ltvaiuiai vvnnnuinuwj ivu E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species ,No t E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals] No RECEIVED Y(0 E.3.a. [Agricultural District] No APR 18 2097 E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark] No ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] No E.3.e. [National Register of Historic Places] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.M. [Archeological Sites] Yes E.3 i. [Designated River Corridor] No Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report I V Board of Zoning Appeals Application RECEIVED APR .� � �a��� AUTHORIZATION (Where the Applicant is not the Owner) ZONING BOARD OFAppEALS J l 56655 Main 5t. LLC c% Jonathan Tibett residing at 185 Willow Point Road,Southold NY IIa71 (Print property owner's name) (Mailing Address) do hereby authorize AndrewV. 61ambertone (Agent) to apply for variance(s) on my behalf from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. Owner's S ature) (Print Owner's Name) RECEIVED .70V APR 18 2W7 3� APPLICANT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS O�YNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid some. YOUR NAME : 56655 Main St. LLG c% Jonathan Tibett (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning X Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship" includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO X If No,sign and date below.If YES,complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant; or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this#day �•,2t) Signature Print Name Jo Athan Tibett �- RECEIVED APR 18 2017 AGENT EP RES E NT AT I VE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME : Andrew V. Glambertone (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply)' Tax grievance Building Permit Variance Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning X Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If No,sign and date below.If Yes,complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) 13)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSIIIP Submitted th da II 20 Signature Print Name Andrew V. Glambertone 5�j RECEIVED Town of Southold APR 18 NIP LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM ZONING BOARD 0� APP9AL-5 A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exefnpt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial pe»nits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions ul Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial-arid-adverze e-ffects-upon tlic-c-oastal-area(wl}ich includes--all-of-Southold Town). ----- 3. If any question in Section C on this fornl is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LIA7RP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it 'is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net),the Board of Trustees Office,the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. li. DESCRIP'T'ION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTAV 63 - 03 - 15 'file Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Dept. ❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees ❑ 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital ❑ constriction,planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) ❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: x❑ Mature and extent of action: The proposed action consists of the construction of a 44 unit hotel,outdoor swimming pool as well as requlred parking to serve some. In addition the existing two-story frame dwelling with detached garage and shed would remain,but would be converted to a restaurant consisting of "I4 seats. RECEIVED i Location of action: 56655 Main Road (Route 25), Southold APR 18 2017 Site acreage: 6.75 +/- y ^ ^--___ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Present land use: Residentlal Present zoning classification: HB - Hamlet Business District 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Andrew V. Giambertone (b) Mailing address: 62 Elm 5t. Huntington NY 11143 (c) Telephone number: Area Code( ) (651) 567-0050 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly Luldertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? NYSDOT Highway Work Permit,NYSDEG Yes FX1 No❑ If yes,which state or federal agency? Notice of Intent DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable See Attachment Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable The proposal is to retain the existing residential structure as to protect and preserve the significance it may have to the Town of 5out o . Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable c� J See Attachment IRECEIVED APR 18 2017 Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No M Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes ❑ No ❑Not Applicable The proposed protect hill handle all It's sanitary waste through on-site septic and sanitary leaching pools. The proposed project would also be served by 5GWA. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III— Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ Nox❑ Not Applicable • s _ Lfu REMA ED Attach additional sheets if necessary - 2017 Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWJ MRN@RfiRRDF-ql llt Ws Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III—Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No❑ Not Applicable No unusual air discharge points are assocloted with the proposed project. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. El Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Solid waste created bN the proposed project would be disposed of N Independent garbage removal service therefore not create an Increase of solid waste to the Town of 5outhold. No hazardous substances or wastes would be created by the proposed project. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal Seaters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes❑ No 0 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary 'WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ I es ❑ No Fx] Not i1ppiicable _ 1,0q�es� — — RECEIVED _ PR ZONING BOARD-OF APPEALS Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable ,FCEIVED APR I B 7017 5C ZONING 504RD OF APPEALS ATTACHMENT LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITILIZATION PROGRAM ("LWRP") CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR THE ENCLAVES 56655 MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character,preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. The proposed action has been designed to enhance community character,preserve open space make efficient use of infrastructure and minimize the potential adverse effects of development. The site is not located on the coastline therefore cannot utilize the resource. The existing structure is situated at the front of the property whose main exposure is onto Main Road, Rte.25. As part of the proposal is to retain the existing two story structure this would help maintain the visual character along Main Road. As to the preserving of open space,the proposed project is designed such that the allowable lot coverage is 40% and the proposed lot coverage is 16.3%. The intent is to preserve as many of the significant existing trees as possible, in addition significant screen planting would be proposed to further screen the property from the neighboring properties. In addition the project has placed the parking areas alongside the West side of the property, abutting the existing boat yard, and to the North, abutting the LIRR tracks,this to further buffer the (3)residences to the East from the parking. Efficient use of infrastructure,potable water is available at the site and shall be provided by Suffolk County Water Authority("SCWA"). On-site septic tanks and sanitary leaching pools will handle sanitary waste to be generated by proposed project,based on current guidelines of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services ("SCDHS"). In review of the New York State Department of Conservation("NYSDEC") Tidal Wetlands Map indicates the subject property is not a coastal property. Policy 3. Enhance visual and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. A. Minimize introduction of structural design components(including utility lines, lighting,signage and fencing) which would be discordant with existing natural scenic components and character. RECEIVED /,� t 4` APR 18 20V S ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS The proposed utility lines will be located underground and would not impact the scenic component of the area. Landscaping will be provided as to screen the perimeter of the property as well as preserve the existing vegetation, all of which will screen the project from the neighboring properties. Lighting for the project will be focused inward on the property and be designed consistent with the character of the community, minimizing any effect on the neighboring properties. Signage will be designed to visually conform to the character of the community. B. Restore deteriorated and remove degraded visual components. The existing residence being the main visual component will remain and be renovated to accommodate proposed change in use. This will consist of keeping and restoring its aesthetics therefore enhancing its visual component. C Screen components of development which detract from visual quality. The proposed has been designed in a manner that is aesthetically pleasing. It is the intention to screen plant the perimeter of the project to screen it from the neighboring properties. D. Use appropriate siting,scales,forms, and materials to ensure that structures are compatible with and add interest to existing scenic components. As previously stated the existing structure on Main Rd. is to remain, therefore keeping with the compatibility of existing components. The proposed portion of the project which is new, the Hotel, is sited at the rear of the property therefore not very visible from Main Rd. and as we will be screen planting between the existing structure and the new structure the visibility from Main Rd. will be very limited. E. Preserve existing vegetation and establish new indigenous vegetation to enhance scenic quality: 1. Preserve existing vegetation which contributes to the scenic quality of the landscape. To the extent possible the existing vegetation would remain as well as when feasible any existing trees will be transplanted and incorporated in the screen planting. -70 RFCEIVED APP 18 2017 ZONING BOARD OF APPRALS 2. Allow for selective clearing of vegetation to provide public views without impairing values associated with the affected vegetation. The only public view of the subject property is from Main Road, which is and will be limited to the existing two-story home. These views will be maintained as the existing residential building will be retained. 3. Restore historic or important designed landscapes to preserve intended or designed aesthetic values. Although not"Historic"the original property, when utilized as a"Bed & Breakfast" by the previous owner was known as "The Hedges" due to the stand of significant privet hedge at the back of the house. We would transplant and add to this hedge line to significantly screen the hotel proposed at the back of the property from visibility from Main St. 4. Restore or add indigenous vegetation cover that presents a natural appearance. As stated above this property was used for agricultural purposes and continues to revegetate. It is the intent of the applicant to propose a mix of native vegetation as well as ornamental vegetation which would create a natural appearance. F. Improve the visual quality associated with hamlet areas. The subject property is situated within the Hamlet Business District in the Town of Southold. As previously stated the portion of the project which is visible from Main Rd. is proposed to remain therefore keeping with the visual quality of the hamlet, the hotel portion shall be screened from Main St. G. Improve the visual quality of historic maritime areas. The site is not located in a coastal area or a historic maritime area, therefore this portion of the policy is not applicable. H. Protect the visual interest provided by active water-dependent uses. The site is not located proximate to water or active water-dependent uses, therefore this portion of the policy is not applicable. I. Anticipate and prevent impairment of dynamic landscape elements that contribute to ephemeral visual qualities. RECEIVED APR 18 2017 ZONING BOAR®OF APPEALS There are no dynamic landscape elements; therefore this portion of the policy is not applicable. J. Protect visual quality associated with public lands, including public transportation routes,public parks and public trust lands and waters. 1. Limit water surface coverage or intrusion to the minimum amount necessary. The subject property is not public land, nor is it a coastal property. Therefore this portion of the policy is not applicable. 2. Limit alteration of shoreline elements which contribute to scenic quality. The subject property is not public land, nor is it a coastal property. Therefore this portion of the policy is not applicable. K Protect visual quality associated with agricultural land, open space and natural resources. 1. Maintain or restore original landforms except where altered landforms provide useful screening or contribute to scenic quality. The current view, from Main Road, of existing home will be maintained as the existing home will remain, existing landscape will remain or enhanced where possible. Screening of the entire property from the neighbors will be implemented with new vegetation as well as with relocating existing vegetation where possible. 2. Group or orient structures during site design to preserve open space and provide visual organization. The orientation of the proposed structures was designed to provide the largest amount of open space between building and neighboring property line on the side of the residential neighbors therefore providing area to properly screen the property line. 3. Avoid structures or activities which introduce visual interruptions to natural landscapes including: a. Introduction of intrusive artificial light sources; The lighting will be focused inward on the property and be designed in a manner which will minimize glare and illumination onto surrounding properties. b. Fragmentation of and structural intrusion into open space areas The subject property is surrounded on three (3) sides, one side by residential, one side by commercial development (boat yard) and on one side by Long Island Rail Road ("LIRR") tracks, therefore this portion of the policy is not applicable. c. Changes to the continuity and configuration of natural shorelines and associated vegetation. The subject property is not a coastal property, therefore it has no shoreline so this portion of the policy is not applicable. i 70 Yl� Sti RECEDED APP A 8 2011 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS -TOWN OF SOUTHOLDTY, RECSOR; CARD OWNER� STREET VILLAGE LLC' DIST.1 SUB. LOT FORMER OWNERN E 6 ACR. �. '4 SW TYPE OF BUILDING ES. SEAS. 'VL. FARM COMM. CB. misc. Mkt. Value LAND IMP, TOTAL DATE REMARKS c" -+x rt i Y' 2 2- 411 L f.;f" < 0-d U 0, NEW NORMAL I BELOW J ABOVE FARM Acre Value Per Value Acre 'illable illable 2 illable 3 T /oodland rd 13 wompl.and FRONTAGE ON WATER rushland FRONTAGE ON ROAD Zq 11-- louse Plot I I DEPTH "71 BULKHEAD otal DOCK COLOR I , Wh TRIM r .� 14 ~- � I A.uBh�g. 3 / x�(� _���d v I Foundation /'� r , L ` Bath i Dinette) ^- - xtens on �i� '� X 0 Jj U 3 ,, Basement - Floors K xtension Ext. Walls �/� Interior Finish I LR I ndnlN 3 — (1 / XX 1/O / :xtension I Fire Place ,7�� 1 I Heat =� j1 ,=-r DR. .- - 2 fro ,2� Type Roof �rG �, �,� Rooms lst Floor �j BR. aV", I Recreation Roo Rooms 2nd Floc FiN B. 'orch i Dormer 3reezeway Driveway .SarageD O ---- :r Patio 9 0. B_Total --- �/ ; Yn y -r. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD 1 U, J - DWNER. STREET VILLAGE DIST.i SUB. LOT OWNER N E AC S , W TYPE OF BUILDING ES. i SEAS. jVL. FARM 1 COMM. CB. MISC. Mkt. Value LAND i IMP. TOTAL I DATE I REMARKS 4 J70' 7-6 7 n o -Al AGE i BUILDING CONDITION — I NEW NORMAL I -BELOW ABOVE FARM Acre Value Per Value Acre Fillable I illable 2 -illable 3 % Voodlcnd ;wampland FRONTAGE ON WATER f"n FRONTAGE ON ROAD D k—p -louse Plot I j i DEPTH IBULKHEAD Total I I I DOCK 1 - S.G.T.M. NO. IOOv-63-05-16 I WOOD P05T5 WITH NETTING EX15TINC7 1 STORY FRAME ° SHED TO BE RENOVATED ❑ AND!INCORPORATED INTO ❑ MAIN STRUCTURE 510.00, 50-7044'40"E ❑ 50-7o44 40 E L ❑ — ❑ — ❑ �, SIGN rnN 3 4 xIc� NEW PROP05ED -0 w DRIVEWAY5 OF APPEAL5 ZON4 I� we I I 2 EXI5TING I STORY \ EXIS REMAING TO < W FRAME GARAGE 22'-8yg" n TO REMAINo (� ��` 11 __J �____ EXIST'G. O G RBA E -0- ° Z (Y j ARE A 10 to cb EXISTING TO 2 STORY STRUCTURE TO REMAIN Z SIGN A.Prom cb EXISTING TO f;�� IT-2-- PROPOS BE REMOVED 12 I /i i FRONTY 5ETBAG PROPOSED ADDITION TO Z Z [171 � � EXISTING STRUCTURE s ,'slae> Z �1 EXI5TING TO 3 Q j SIGN L J BE REMOVED U) O O m s I ate r(1 13 OI c O" K REG'D w F NIT LU �j NEW PROP05ED DRIVEWAY I 5ETBA z � Z I V IL VLL LL f 13 13 i shed N04°45'20"YV if 178.00' xcb i z LL LL hQ 6 drawn: scale: job#: ate: Giambertone Architects e.f.s. N.T.S. 16-003 01-30-2017 62 Elm Street nde' Huntington,NY 11743 Exist'g Photo dwg: P:631.367.0050 F:631.367.6636 Key Plan APR , ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS A .r W_ Y TOM NEWS _1111 w" t . �Yr++YrrrMi� .. . �..»...,_,.... ...... yam•--� � ....... �� .vw ` a _. F►+� :ire«... _ ".- ,..�. a +. L y - m # 1 rr � • xAM oil Aw • ��fi* + iI i •`l Y,. M v...lT� g•.�. ,. 1� £ �!K .f �,,.rW 7yfn,N •�Til w +�.� �• - Y� - - �.i • - xur'. ...-..:.�•' _•;;.L fwf J \- .f.y.;.'�R,d ,.. '"eR�. � - .,� +��, - 1R'��� S r .,Y i' 4 _ I Ilii — lift _ 1,. r ;Tlr+l~ %Y=om � �,r s_✓�,a�+���Rt^. �y ?#'d'• t��' -- '�` >.,�4�ta.a:-.4'''�+ wAf�lr"����"��^rt 'S45°:`i+r5 �. St �` ��?a�t-S;�,�iXf�'$+c-„�w•� �i�1�- -: ,�`.T- `� .�{'�c� �` ,.� � f+w 4 OL A I: Ali } �t V j s x 4 � _.i wskiak,,.s 1 • -._ : ■ : i . s�1Yl•'� �_ `• ami ,.,T, ¢ ! T S ,. as a r � r a_A a,. e a dC T ¢ !j .{� � SRI �• #� h , y " _ - - i.�. * et r •ilk n • 4. I 1�. '�M �•�i.� `.� � ,�F ' r' ,� blow 1��Mw WF !, -� 1 >.• : 11 1p AIM, ra (y O NN �� •r "fir} '"�`j + R( % y5e • s ;.yam I R ►4 I�Iy i / �` rr fro ki lc* JF or ILM OL Di� r f , ..........:...... � ;moi - Y .I. ,.:. .. � ..fir �"�__,.* - ,�•9�-� � '} R v � a � . t ~' - .y; �'"wl"g'r+ir "'•y°.•M-u`• .x����� x ,+n :i.# rs ...1 _40- 14 40- • ,s-"d �ivr'ate�,- . -• -�,.- ,... 1 '.� �-,� •,r r.�, ,a �,+ww-: ��•,�� .. fid• ,- �.+�!' a,� _�;;",.� *` .. ^,f✓+Jr- 01 It • it �• • •,�, !� ,�, ��+�w.,i�.. r+_ +: .. ,si't:�. .�"••��1 '�w��• p:t# e, � "N,ai� _a''�'y*yam' F_�j/'�, 'F�:•a f � r� `�' ��� ,� 114 y^ r3:.�`e/'4 +'�Sy ! ���' �w�',t ♦r' 1�"� 'A ..p"• #ti �� �'�� - � t.��s r.✓• °:. 1 • � � +�►,�, •1 Sir ya� .• "� All r As �r b.ate�.�,,, • '., ' r 1 a 1 4Lr r t o-"d, a. M1 A. Oi f: o- �rA 3 1 t *fp�Rl i M ,00 rod- •'S do 1 }. WIT I JK Mt Amp If Ll t It It It e . y � y - + • •. Kia•.j a �'. !� .`���#� �.rl�lf•y=••'���� . ♦ s.�#� .« I��- ''.�. �� a r r ...r' �� i� t w s ' ,Ys*' r � i,h,, .p"�,►[�.. ...ah. G r�-T" ' .,� -n • 'f►F► Is «�r r:T',4 ti.._..-*.'^•/ ,. r .ter • M' � � y'• � J� �- 2. .�A• ..,: .'.fes'"` - ,. - � •. .- 'a�>r'.. - - "', �: •� IL sr 1p ,r...... ' s r' 1 - • - ♦ • --! .p �.f`fly • - . r P FtEGEIVE[ale : ,)ARDOFAPPEALS 04 _I ,a # 10 a SS y� �s•� "�`�� J.` wYMMt. T (1Y+nr��k`awvw��+r.�rr�y� dot •r 14 fc r • . �.a'aP: 1 ry 1 H ..w�s• J, - �, �� _-. ' }:� � may. ` I(q(,o k RECEIVEC� ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 77 12 r k e � k I M �, � � # fit •, , 'r l � ' 1 I� f f •I F t f' K� I _ I r TORN HARBOR j r LANE ! �y ~DR y��� 1�I g LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF VALERM.SC40PAZ LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF S.GT.M.NO X3- 03-16 ANTHONY FOR61ONE LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF VINGENiDOLOMITE tILEANADOLOMITE f F e�rWWN5mow nwe S G.T.M. NO.1000-65-03-11.9 m AM WW sawAW 5 G.TM.N0.1000-65-03-11.4 �wmau�My 4 6=.ia' J I ! eor44+40'E ebnc • .k r.�• k '- eaYeMr . .m.r®a. ; ba I Te[fAMA imVw ro ar S i • J L_ cams. .rr „+,'i//,�'r��/,'r_ ,ei`=«,r'.,yJ' if''!''i'dCG'+``-' 7�r '' - • �`_ IXMM'M2 MW Sim'� %✓ fc %.e•'`*4st-' - .3>,''' ' f,y#;,X.:.e'4btrt kik-� iyrffkf?j`, 9IIOLTIQ ro�Ne ST 9- ,sf-;� - f��� ,n�- F5f�'',t�F''.:,;�".. ST#2 '.y a3«yr/' r Furca r . a ',7�;". qtr l f � f' �r}i• ., �;T,`f.+'?,` r-'� �,x ,+ / ,, �nr.,r- !H/ �'� r f % � +F/fi/r rv` �! /f './`f, s' < d .✓rr �%"� ,r:. 3 J �f�oaroxro W Z S Z / ",5 /f� /s,'sy� �`'✓,/��,fir,_✓����, r� �t% �,y / oanwro °N !%v���.!�s,,.rurf'�,.5��,��Fr//���rz���:'�!.%f.'/%�a.f,`` "✓,'',,.,?�'"fr,r�:�:'% e:lmv"� ST#4 T#i5f%yi • F. ST#D �nie a ul f CHMeakwj % fafJ -4'MOW A MME K M " .. „ O �r! 9 , 0 0 0 0 Co4 e ' .: - : rnoi: .r^'= �J�f.f�/r���=�,�;.� f, LAND NOw OR FORMERLY of rr / YY r d EL*EN TOMASIG t MIRELLA TOMASIG 4 _�,"��v,".��/L'��,�y^r� ='� � S.G.TM. NO.1000-69-03-14 ® ® ® 052 g ® o sT#s sT#1 Y ►wa2Mr LOCUST LANE i le�n�wcmam�r I � claw LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF I JANET L.RYAN j SL.TM. NO.1000-69-03-I5 e i I NOS'9050'W �"� 6165? _ g LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF LAND NOW OR FORM6iLY OF °1 SLM.TM. NO.1000-63-03-28.1 PILES NOTY HOLT INS LL12 f ' rbs5oso7v � ' '+ APP 1 2017 drawn: scale: job#: ate: q d�G - Giambertone Architects e.f s. N.T.S. 16-003 04-13-2017 4 g®A�2D c)x a�'IOEALS 62 Elm Street title: Huntington,NY 11743 Stake-Out Diagram dwg. P:631.367.0050 F:631.367.6636 .I � 'kd t' A xw ` 4 T NQ ^ it 1 � ■r ,.Y. L }��ti� fi°, Rr.. ,'^, •.t �, .r. - - "}` `-` x. . ��.`"a rirrf'1i L4 _ `". ♦• ��}� xbr,#\'� «.,['N�. r sin J,r , J y,'•per' ■3�a � �6^ _� ;'i'- ,..y. ���T 4 , .'✓rte .. Je ..x ai!. Y t .R`'• �` '#i L'ic+ x yr.:«. s , 4 ..� '"..«.... ►nR� \., �i ..fir �. ; a. j r � �� �� F_ �'a 'ao' 3 m iy.a -y'1 �M,« _ ■' M :■ , :. i y■�� R is VV r' VAP UARU U�AP�F,AL.� ;.;,.. NG . " :`- ZONI , ;! a ! JC�. '�r. .x �ii,.r . •sx'n +c .i " 4 , '■fyy'" r x - x L-" F �+- y� •� 1 .fir. r .. �` �! .ltet A' f .�� 5: �•�l�+s k��1 ` � �:i� �t ��'� � .=,r '' _ �'� �� `' q4i M ,'�� � ++ _/ ' .'4 fir:ry•,?.1. t��r`'' "i' �¢ it �. ■ 1�i- .n �■+.`;'�. � }. x i ta 1 r i ar g!r } '� x iM�. ! + I�• .a .s y � "!� - �t 'il, 'f � ,��� Y`!y>• a+ i .. •�� f��i � FF ,� atm r �*i - y " `r � R ■ �. .. r .-,air _ y` ? �iF :t' !■fie - « s. !��.,'j!�'��"+s rr't., t 5 �i�, ► •r �"i� 4°�• r may."-i`` at"3 r1 �,. xr ~►, � �x� st "• ' ,��" Mti�+ Y!R is ,{ �' " « �� f �M 'ff 'r i.,.,.� _ . i Y.�" :�R{! � .�, � r ��}� ■ i !r "r" "� z a Yls a1i�j Y� i a�J �• :. _c �'..`� ��' "! J ; r R J� r .� �s ?- ���,.. �• }f11,��i.� Is �= STAKE # 1 � - :, • —,x'. it.R P.M., . iii 1;'�.aJ .�!§�� �f�aa� _ `■�1. #i " '-�, r{4+�e. - r"*Q. � r ����r y '•a .`.'«`i.�L. >r ; ' RECEIVEIy —704(o APR 18 2017 S ;BONING BOARD OF APPEALS h ! [ .. a .. -x � • 3 6 • tom: • s k . �' � 'r°.a}§ '!�`y ... r<� � p� iF� - s� fYir y r ,' /' �: -�%!. • .-v R. mow. .'r :� �3 $ 'cf T - s.� r. p•C_-..W ,,, r, i �' Si t r t#' EI[ r 'JiL e e }./ 6t r r - l•'•'a a ice. _a r. 'Ur :x 'k :.. � * , 7 i 1 ` Fti ' �s}, t r r _t4 ,_ �; � `+ .•':.: - a ��►� �`� ����-.�^ • -.tea �. �•° ff'�'�T'7 r pj', -., � .. .. • ,�_ .. ... Y ,may�3 _ � � ' T ' n � i a r "g • S s a v *[., t,o,,t s. a t' M"'�•'' � ` a�i4*� �c rit � •'er' '� -" .;. -.N , 5.a 4.. �. $-'�}".. 4or .`s� -� '' �..., - , - i ( J ; i i.a.. ia- �•!f•. Vis- r•..>♦es .. 3 a s•-._. . Ma f fi y� v - � Jima • r+r•• �! t �. � 4 r 5 • ... } � - -'a a' a.- - ..ve-,•' F., {y a� Opt 40^ Y�Tf ii y W t �LlS • ,.1 � i �� _ -..1 •r. a fft" Ar ,.., i, �1 r i�'- � a. + , cf Ft 4. a. ' �- + `'• ' M �t �r"r -.�� a -•'k�,s1 y+ '�•r,' ! - �+ aw r tt ��. • a a_ _ :p F }�"-.w �, :• r : r p r .y • } R`.�a ,�i• +•:,q' 1 . { -00 ." ; ih•r�.,� �3 �.. '�.t~. l � y ,.. 3'q i a.at a • .r+y,y.�y �� �, ,yi*1�..r - # rt..� �Rl �.�x. ,� � _ su Y�� eek y � + �{, �y ���� �'� A+,4,.. . . ■7�.«f�i �►i5 F, •.�� 91 r _..� #" � �� �'A. �j�r a`• ' r� s .�� . s1 STAKE # 1 _ t s + T _ e r� � :-X'. �"` �.' .`M5 � '� �4k'a.' �rfr l � e�`+• 5♦ .. I_,, - a f+ :a .• .. n n I 7". - P - { Pik IL, . } t Olt ill,`+F' • 44 � • [[: i }' 'a -.al r• i .. • aha a' C ZING€GARL 6F- ts„w` y;. +"�'•'s-.. (t t� fi rYr �. ..-�c .r z ,r3 r""-- -,� y - lot ipr IL ! ■' 1 .. #*{, �, a�' # 4 .. - .xis _ - J'c sa ; 1 moi•$��<�. �ji' r� r �-° �'„x is•ss'i'f's�"=. ��y� �.. s -.� __ —may a �� is 1„ , s+■ + ,. ila7le .F'� w; . ani; � .t- - _ _ b , . y ++ dl , + ? � ii ,g s P -. a , 3 _•a ,4 �`r a�i.►, r i � �� �t c '� �. 6 y F '` �.'� �-ylr �,,$ �. a e�11. �" ��..t w �. `t q .+ J .� ,r ��i''ehMT .F.� a►e.1 y 'r' 4 a ti iy�. yyy k IV Fw-�de k' 04 � r - , G +lir ,a � :rJ'Lir • • �if , STAKE #2 ' 40., t �•�� L ►,: 41 t i7 1 t 1 - '' REGEIVEL / APR 18 2017 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS low r s ... F• '.�'� TIS+ i �,- _} ZA _ t pig �y� -_ �-•s Joe, x v ISM Ir fA 1�Gy i• i . k f - TrtAr a - 1 - ► ,. �p,.�� µ t # " ► .� . K _ r Of 14 At- " + - � '- '� ��� !•„'� �.ice, �- ' '� r STAKE #2 �, �.�,,.. ,-. .-' i• .; }' t r a I.1""JiIJ;`.�1f.�•�' {y-# 4�++r�`'�• �� T�' ,��"'��� , • '�t., �t :, y r`r r 1,. r" a��, 1 � • yyyy4E ,,,at� •��_i#l-� ... w ik 1 3 ..t t r °��,.� i ,`� �l'.5,,,�y��� .a• t - r�[°e iF�":ate r.- i k ,�E ■Yyii ■, � i! �� li{' l ur a 3 'axy 'r t� �Y ert�l� '� ' 1 � ky II +•' c � ~. Ai Yt � L. ..:i�. •4 1�f r Y :: i '�`,{.. ti l:.. *rte. .� - i :� i^2 f�' #� ':"����► .�,Yit�E w r - .a i�;'�;, I� I •..4: ,.r .. J r r III'i to tam ­W1to�. _ 1 J� .. ,.• a i ? � -�� +" �/rte- a itr' f `'I'Y►, 1 14 +s1 IF - ip Jif 46 No er • ` �tR[s }` � *. � r. T r..l _J , I J a r� ,#,` '� r r �_ '�. �"• f�`she': CL }r -,lea I r ■ - ! y� •.. I r 1 .R^.jj�aa 'r:j 5�' -T:Esf• a. .r - 3. ��i I' ^.1 ''" r t}�'sFsr' +- �..`�i+..a.. �r'�i rp 7 4V � „ i ►: t'-' ■ 7 f_Nas i i �7� .tf'.r>� �, � -I. � :1� } F .+�, 1 i 1 -- � , �•#� �Y{�i _ff Jl'�'- �,.� i L .I•�" �° '.,,s. ,•.� �■f„4� �. . fs.�M+� " "�+} :'� . - _ , ' _'f"- i -� � - r •+4� :,:--�i�C r}'° # te'`'a-;y 'J!^�E. ' a i r �Is ,� J E�.r..� #' i f: r{ y . Y ■�! „vJ'�JI •�a._. � ( � y i - "r r�` 4J 1 a _ _ ; �.e a _ IK. ii- -Ff�,• - " 3a I�' 3.'*:� �t"ta. - fi. -1 ^ .# Apo - r ■°• •�."�'�'i �a -.}�«; -� , ' {"■� ��Y#t a� IJ:i�`;r - if •S 1:*'.m.'..p 1 - }i� i ' fff # is��'"� � �g i;'s^i■ii �">r.3 .�.�F -�'- _ �sl+�`F �li��■.E��fs ; '• 1 .gyp•=��' _ A �r.gA •.W a� a .IK� air Y � a i,a .. 'ry�J. ,�'•�r _ `� ( c_ �� .t y/ +1 a !+ 1 .�-. ..i rr�4a / r il:► r j 7r Ii� � r M r ) Y ' a• }f •}I ` < _.� r �.1 � � "r / _�* �.r, � , -'`_'� •/1.�.�i'.a�'��yb,' a Y" �j y_E ,.a x... 1,� ♦yam-,i� .5.-u � i. -�1 ~t .. a�r. 1 � ._'fir. EI � � �j/..' � f_� -�. II r.r ti- - . � is ,�•yi !' �j' - -!� ����re.Y, .. ,rrl'•; �''I�A' +� �3 ��� , r s��E' <'��Y'y �+ - ''CC ��'1� .•�, � ttl r'' i'E i.� '� r � ���.!•' 10L A „' .. ;- �•ir � Y . -r t. : + p _ • � � ' �, . •� :` PPP - _� - •,r.� �. •� .f P. ' aRC�'3F AMM iy aIle , , - a *• r• {.,a'• r r� i4 .�r �7 �rq ';.` t a.♦sr tri'.i {s �Y J+>� ; R"s,;l. ••^ i�-`t •��� '}mss # �Y, �►a}I`` :y ifs ti ;�`` p,;, - ; °+�; s�• K�, •,� {y� • 1 ,. •` ��. ..`, ._ f �` i. F ,.X .�.y p,, �. �-r t� .r*rg,a-■i " - �t. { i.•.e a• ir_�;� r'*' • r ;..• y��■.�, � E § . ;:. ... �y�{"� Jit, `r 14M, A '+ A!r 1.6 '`_r J 'r ,�a F. v _ s ! ' �■a* s Y� -`ate' ' i JR i ii a i r■r +# .. STAKE #3 �a. y � � .r • -�� ..ai � .,� iia 1, ~ >r - ■• a �J��`is•� si+ a YI. /�� — — -altt �°° : • ',�Ir 4 ,�y� �y?•f..■ ��'�,s ''r ��. '40 `�*#.R r ! r 'ice �. + }` ,,,■�jt7� °�t+.'• �4 - HC ;�G BOARD O.FAPPEALS- �. JMI , f r 4 � Wr*y 1 is •.�•?� �i�.�.,� T. � � f� ,-ems � i 1 �r r {-� { y�.: rare- ♦ l •r 7F � ,a.- Js "'' .r.__ •.� `s •. 'iC �_ r' �.'r{'l' °' .': `�' '��y~-f 6 .Y 's r t. - f ,r•'�-' �,}"iPt ,T zst a'r R l b -- ,��y ��+r.�t t J k. r y t� � •t fir` ��' . t� �:-r,�I �'' - +� '`-' .F �'- � ���` Y X � +� � =- ter; .�"'fC ,�'�';•' �•� F;S * b r � "t. '''',` ��,.•f* �r is"��, }i xr t '� r 1k +r °�` ���` ��:j - '•ter- w{� .������ MWX h + R�� , 1 STAKE 94 - n.. � i' a I �- 'i . r_ s' � ..fir ,■ 'i-�^"���r� +f i r y VG gr k jr NEW d P yj e • +4 - 'i '; �' 4 tr '�. it' p i ' � •Y, _ .t ., - a ,T �i..•.J r�'�sti ��� � d -tr �'� •. .'t ,�-«,. r�i ■y;,17Y-�F' i � a. 1, . . �! .� .� -_i}.}i ,fir`" ? }'�+�'t�`• i,�� �i5 �"'. � �; � f � i.. i ,'� �Tit,� "• � {;,��.�,■,-{` � Y .,�, �� r �` R ' t e _d ; _ ' i'..� �. 7 �ipf�r'I. � y'ls,.., '�`si •F, -_ •+.■T "t,.,� - r'. r _ i:s` pHHl+irr .i r �. r ry '� - "'■444kk ■ -fl �' A- .'� �,i; i _`■ -IT T •y �ytk-, �, y,�v. - t {s • �Y 1 i 1 - r ... 'R�i' [ ,,k. 1 '. 'ryg' -��,■iy-��yr L y �i■r►dk ITj� '� ■ ��~ r� -'� r low ! fir, -�`� '- ;'. 7 . 1 • 171 • _ � 'a..'. � • 1ci � Y��"� ,Ij r ' a ti�-= � ~'Vii' `� � R•- I � - �r - b, ..' + i t 1 - �II'' ..III• - ■•� �]�' .. � - - �5 I..r� � � -c.. s moi.w "*. _ �r a ti IL t.• + i •* - *+cyt „_.�} `-i?y ■ � .'I..y °1• ,ss " * ✓ '� _ Xa I � z.� YI�`a4,- r 7�_IY ori. ■#s:. � r i: I• �. c k ��i� 2, �r� • �r s �r• -iy I � s' y�` �'� ■.`•�_ i .4 '��'}F` �,¢ � + A, j'�•r P a; - e'rf '.tr ai -± ■ s r.f tC' _ ' 4°"i ■ •+�.. /Y... ' : y, ., .,1 r�i1.I� � � '. _ .�'� I , `� �' -.l '�-�,r,a � ay 4t ir�� �,�'�riti`'•:�/ -., +i�+1 _ ! � 1• �! ` � i,�t ' t. T . moi • f ' a1`� t _- - j �+r\, �i ■■It- r �•T`i'.. ~ . _e z a � �.. p. I ■r 'yYk i yr`i r r ■,', -■ 1.,� `-SC r c 1 r ■ .. 1 16 i16 ii ! a 'i a. ■ f ■{ _ _ `., ± • 1 .. ,r r.. v .:� y''__..� � a �..■�_ � 4��/'.. L I•:i�r « - T . a �+.,-ear � �iY• IW* Jp. 11#• } •��' rlet �, tel■ ��F .. ; ' i jL AL < �,... , f ��. '•Ilr/ ' ei~ t � } f't • �� �, •'y_ .1 � � aadi �t`i t .j , .. i e A# .. - e ; - e• r, ' p t j W=! i a1 �i, F1�1i �' STAKE #S � ��I + � ; ,�_� ' t 1 r } a. • '"I • • r - .�1i1 lig`_ 'T" I �•i'•s'4 ��r' � I �• IJ ��j ,, ,; .{�.��F #'� ;�l4d`•� �` „ .. .: i## j tY �r r 'r` — _� *"�* .T 7i ,'�1l .1F _ •.' .w _ e._. 1 }. �, r• ;�i �' ��'; r • 'rte + *� ti• , - .. }�_' i} r i + •'..,� r !+' it '►'7 IC. ' �, a • '•� _/`t 1� - - lig ,,tM•r� _ �; AT�s*�{ ��.� }e•�' - '� 3 _ AZT. r fA owl * �..�"� r+ 'l na ''Ir.',►;s.�' Hyl s_ ASAt tc sl 01 ,�1• -- • 'x'p�a*� .: y s y. t ,T W'. �♦ Mi ... dal A. elU J« 7r r 1. ' •.y. ,y r J , ...i .r,.• A ,1 Yj�u.«1 f is i yy�y lit r+� `�+1' �.a c�_ _ _ =a •.+ • + .+ i1' VVV..` _..J.nIs> 1 , A •- J•F t.., ,* _ t a'? c�?, �.+. �� •` . �• + � .�•�`i r�_•" ri[.. '1 :� !s.�•!,� •' •i. <s it k l r Y + = + s aeti t ' a _ r- ��yy* yY���`Id' .sJf �j +. �'• `1. �.rj'j, �- -�'� s. ; .� �. w i��r"f, 't _ - , +.s, a L�,1V 1� '=4r y._�`ir s _.� !f •�• i eT�• '� '� _ .. a .�.- .''sem,,.�` .•...' i; :#. � _ ..rt'a ;►t .i�.y. .d �,r t c 1 ,�� ; ��, � 1 R► � • A Zia.� '6 , �C/` + }':,�• .'dei•" y fiyj.• + � �� IY.•.,. t •. SP1 � a s •r: �. i � • - `•r< 1 �\.a i'* �3 r�� `� 4 l fi fa- 444 +�. a a . 1 1� 'M �.i ■'`i•"* ie+r'yaY�_ a 1 4 a f"• � pr c S r .:� �' 1�}iC •F., iii+. moi' , �i� tj' x� s r,•'1 - �4, :�i�:a.Q� � �a� s. yrl }�•� i ; I+� —.y� { ,T s ' f it �'I � ►r ►t r r�,7* � r _ or1 rte„ f '+1/r/ - 1� ' R iR.i-f ` — ` '#- jl•a �• a •M. ° �: �.~• •4 1 0 �.� tv ; f.', � •; ". '•_;f �{, 1 if .r .m / +'r • A�# s. �` +r ' �• Iii e�i -s M °i_ r 1 s+ a! 4AV ��'�# y, !' ,,r S ; �+•enl.+"' ,moi. .,• ' Y JRJ.sAl asa :, E 1 t t + !��•s y��''M�y# + ii � x tA/a� �_s ,t ."� 4� •� � �,.�+*� 7 `;��. ^l '� �A • k�'� ,�r !' ..sa'�.. e-� 1, s a !� i • * r �,� '�k� �� � eta q�,�,_ L_, ' Ar yl�•,p. iF.i :; R � f +r:. f s {�i�lT r' 1 �A �, p,.l� �. -.a�#� ��LL � w, f, : tt+••c. = T '+ate • i r/• 'F ' ! ' ' i i"'� S�' 1+ 3 +r . Sqr STAKE #5 ��� y aV6 01 V tjl. [F,* .. .� ► . ,.�. ,�t. r �_�� � pie - D 1 RECEIVEC, -APR qua 1 r �� �#�, {` p . ' f i, ', a► _ L()NING ROARD`OAPPEALS" ,rr ` " r Ya/ !fir -a: - ,° +tr�l•. .• , y,• •' � a "' ' r " . -'r. - • 'f�'r a ,, ,", x i �C s• .Y Y L �_ ,• �'• N,. 4M 1; � � ♦ P r r � y�1y( R " M� Y`� '�s R!e •l »'i � • n _ ,y° �'�• .�.� � + .�,� .` _r�'" t +y •.[�'� _ "' r :a f' a .Ewe.,a, {,*`a•�a�~►' r " ;y' �,�, 'I� ,� ♦,:t •'' ..: -. -.{rf ,{" Y M w4 t .11 it { 'f,•,, S,�. t-��it. _,rr M F ',Rr „may �`► , Jtf r ' rMow OA +rl IMrn 1' ',, .� -ts. • -,.� 4y.+�� � :nom R r' �. � y{,: r s. qtr• • : lam '• .. mo f , 1 ; .�}• �J� •Isa t.Y " ..,y�.P tR_N_ wry... '4 *Y��,q•�k ,�'.�t r.•*. - ' � -• �4 _ •T : .n_ f+i � •�y�• „i, sri d'.. .•` -. j • _ ±'j°r�yam- .�s. . .1 ' - i •4 _ 1 i SRIF. . Y }f � y, k y��•1,1 _ IL 4 a.e y 5 �� ".s ir:��,a�,�{`� i rd' ;.1..• •t e� l•7�a '4T � ''ir '�� � ��� X. 16 OIL R`v� tf ..1' ,! - - ;^.f.�ti + /in � _� ,�•� "f-`_ter` •� � �.. rE r'� y�,�, �-� fes ��l- F s' f"'. i-�lR•1 � � ,r A der 4 �• `'` +; 46, `� �� ..Y�' +. •e I + �•-•-.. _ � •.L /_��,j,� � �=�s� ;4 }�y mei �J•.46 ,; a•-- ��.r;;. lk .r I r s a• '�fj � ' e` r « ♦, �+'r�P !_. _ " 4 ..'fit IN, �! - fl+ '� `• H �F�y �� 1.r •Yj�v'�•11. T� r 4't .-r, ± '�,r 'a r r'4r f Via+. 'mow +t'• _ #' ..y.a ..+'i..s• dadab �,,tom •''!�. :1n� ` ,;. •t ..t,,� �'.�i '� V s �•�. ��t.- � �\ •r " `._� -ai Fj x 'i. « • �r r, q�r r"r �r'll`',, � r j s •+ +1t r�lE (+r ,i'�. -*r• 4 i`aY% .. ,.. +s 1��r • .. .. 1 rysrr +,7 'a� .r , -,i� � �F/� �r.. � f"� �1. •�� Y ` r ar�L��AIt a 7 rFL Jr 4 \\ � r�4`AL �, �.:��. � r �,r� a i- �' ;_ ate' t � • '� �f a - ��y. •�• i �,.• 'ra a` r+i+f r ��Rr- �I '.. �1 ' 4 1V -qui Asir .4wi�is r i;. r ice,`�i ! Ori" i 0 4k XII 7> � R+ �� f �• fi' i` / .t � r M` l • � r� •Irk ii it �4I '' � , S TAKE #6 *` ECE APRa _ r r OF.AP. + 1►y _� jL`.. * '.�.. . , . +r •t OA�D ` �c }� ► ■=a a. ! " BONING *` ,� rry;_ ,. r , r � "ryt ■._1qr_� ��. ` �k ` - # ... �. _, �, r ..a. ,'t ''" ► !' 4 r"�-� moi* -As-..`f[ ���11� �l ' _,- � ; .-�s} � i � +.. e. ;•� .� _ - °`li r' rr`'�` .a i r, r � � �s mss/ :`' � .��_ •s-4wr - •'r � 6. h - IrR :a..r 1 w..�� r '7 `!• 1 ,. Te• `' ' e-e. �,■ y -�,a ■ !. ye- k - � __'�'i'ti_.�'- r� .a+1 � �►,rA' '+kf�•�' r,r,r M.�.,5 .. ■ ` .�r i,', '�'. 1-�.� -� �� `��'•art .'w� ' '6 � �=a �' ��3 ..■� y a � 4.3 �`s s „� �. - •4.':. y '.!+�.* �'_' + t a .' -� c-.' , ^} r,..- �hJ T"r p 3+ ` .. ■f h•x; }[�LL�r' � Flo ' ' b' .. ,y' yw li ! ,� JI •■�. f .+ylbs 'r *, Irr•� 'r • _ ... ■.y • rf' * �_� - �'`� ■.:- '� . :a... • ... .� -' ,iy�a.,� .:Sr�� 'S a s � -h t. s " ...• v ,i � �4 ' a 1. s. _ i■�PY. Oil F 1�� 'e, � rryysrs��! �L r .w.l�* _ � r�rr .. an' •�+ ^a rr. 16 q. r � J ��J• f'k ' �*.$a. ��• T �1!■ i ■■,, ... r ��i` � s. 'i�°� '_ �� - p,y?a �i�' ► : la 4.r..;�lir�+.'y r i (�• ,r ! -iFr rl-r� ' i_ ky■.. .tom '■ ', 1+ r 1.. ~ r -z �. 4 +i; - ' -'�y. a■, ' �"'3. ,• � '•'� ]may/ ,� t i fit s- •. ■. `� +`�r.+� ` J*,.J. �. Nit -.1 r•#:5 , ! ■ " -M..' �'�,' f Jr .f a70 JRr ' s art e'.'�!'�``I "- •++S_ ,.°?' wi �'AII,�'4'. 4�' �t�'+ �•.:. _=`• fi -iia ly��nr•,i � o4`1 ryyYL-. • j, .a _ ,r ` i !' r•: !' •p i r , .4 ��.� ; r s • i:'', s�,�••af ..-.% No 06 !; ly. ` 4• r i t4-y,l.T.•• ,r�.!'t �� fi'. +.+ r.. rt �, �.ri,.rye' IOwM.SEi` •Iebe1 ,r '4• �.. do JWo � X45 -*,`�.,. ,� � ;,' `�' '' •.i. rs >� i, .. y,'t+ t F w '�' ►+ "� ''1 •r Wiz• !r•ifoe 40 OF ...* , ��"TTiir � � „�' _ �..��'r '1 'r�. - '�+a■ t r f�' •��AI�, �I ��J �'1����, YA It t a f h t iy+ •` ;rt � � � � � r � �/ ��� -'tom ,. +,�,� I,J, 1,. !`S � _sem > p * r r%j4 der r- STAKE #6 r , 4.: � t I 4 wR 't 1 r .-•''� �.,rJ1$ i I'�.,'�.,-�r '! ... ,� �� t. ■,� it J :�,rY :.yr s- J •' � �,"#^x `�r �. X�'� x .. -3 r' s ,�* -yn�I. :�•z ''_it- � ,�.x�r..�'"� �_ p +' ' '• } -f 'fir! Mme' .- •1!- I -Y PURO QF ti r ,ter i .�-� .mss a �f. - � .. ■_ i r ��J. r , +++rrrlEE �4 �.s .• + �j x 70; i:• _ ' r `-' _ � -—.may,j -+ •q� .mY- _ - � � ►�, r rid' r,. -r _.- - •Jf•_ r. .. S ,. 1 = 1+.� � '..'� .. ti.�r� '7 1�,�,:' _ - '.�� a '',� °'!r+._ �r.r. �-.air -■ e 'I h - I: i!a .:;__r a - _ s} a • -r i+r`r '.. I ! v + •w _r. vp 40. To OW �� ■ Mfr' " 4� �i'" 'rr� je � �-t 'ter + ��,.�.. , ?'°`. _.. s .',1,�. .. r a• ,! rs'7�•4}-..� •-iR ■ a" c �•�7 * -.ais rT' a .��. 1,*. 4`,i IR ^' r•'.r. • 7yy,,� �E 4 C a� �� a� r�-Y �fi�..�•i+ "E#� _'- ,t a 5 ��►�.+s4�.,.�y.�� a � -'�a � �a�.. 91 •''!rte .. , �:• _ '- -. ... � `-� �_ '�'�:- ...�' t R• � _ � yJ��,;,5� IL "Tor •I�.� s : i9• ,�I. , r r ally./ ■ - _,i �i . r 3 Flypr '1f. rwir ,r `, `'f'i,: !��'+• 'w'�jn� - �T F r 1p ��T � I�"+■mss r= -�* - � n 't _tea � _ �� �. ��e � ���, *■� - 7 *.. !". a,..ry. F•��=r � #:Lam■-.� �1 �, "7� e ! a • �, �' 40 iVo * p - STAKE #7 ��,� ti x i1 'Wr....r- , ' - s:J r•a •+!i�1 a i i.f J�f�a. ...;� sh AMR ,,m r - t"� -* ���■r:;■i. ,a '- - •;�"r:,s�.• k `�.j f t jZ'.e '"'liy�i� ,t■^• s � is ��`_�R+• , ,�.. t,- ..::#/�'' .' rf , '�` -ll u �^ .r ,tri'! 4y ,. 7 ••+ - - y ! '�r• /� ('y f�`�. /��p•'�►f�i 1 r. _■^• - ■ d- iKt�' ..y„Ar �r "Y".�.. ;J�,°r•1 - ''Z�T.'�at-.�..' -_�:.ti R •.7L�./IVerf]-'�"o 11�`c•`•" MrT CI��r.- .. � .a. j� 4�, 1• J- .t r', '��'• t- ~T�� J R � � � 4 �•m"-,� ��4.1. .QTc � T.•5 . _ r.'• ''7 . IT i : ! ■ `1 ,• S- I.IL .1,.,-Y: ai' ti � � �r r ■ '1�,.: 'r�.�* ��' i +- ,�. >,- ++r ,-•1�:' i�■�r i- :,r�" ' } �'�`� 'i� ZT�F. •A *li ± # •t•, •r ■■ • .y.J 1 T;� ry err-Py,miss- .; iia a.' r t- ■`•at �i Mp s ++r ',.�• r-c .2,+ �j7+ � rp ''7Z fT�y7�� r-_ y ` -f - ��T-�7 �-'4. t •`� . r. ..t• �p;�! , i gd `ii +F .°R."'t -r � :1�r e�•' r� f■' �•, ,a`,� ,! tPee'*11 guy .�•�{�, ■�,�'�• � JT'P*..�.' a., ;t i � �1 ■1�y ,� ''r..- ,a-.A ■ � , � �•t 5�+_ ' aiiky �Y■ •■ '�■ 'r,,•r-Y sL �'+ ef,, ,' V +il� i h.�� - y.it - , �f.. «i,-4j �{ ��- {,�"' _4 -�•r' 'S!►�r�r y:- i r . = r y" ' . rlc. j!'�i�s+ '*" - +si.n! r '. " Y�?'�-p,� r�-rd• '� "I - +1'.:�, _ + +:q"�Jit s -T,•4�` •T'Gr r'+E �i'*j�� �j' r• �, -,•t/, t , Rsy { a t' '■:i ,�•4� , ,'�_r,y' 'r'�" -i` + „t, $. r, - i ,M�k� it f�� h-rYw � :.fc-� B=* { �•ik� T y �„ ;�;�_ y�; . � ��_!! IL .►�� N ���,.1 ■■ " .!•■„ � � { 'moi,�a ,�•} - � Yi, �yy►I�� �y�.-a�'"" ti..� f�,i-'��.r__'1��'' :Y ���d. ..i,J�,� ,r•ir r a r+. �._ L S ., Lid 7K�•._. -� R_ e�'•SI'�■�' �� �+ •z .l..In1•-■ i t C -, ��y, ., ■1{_ �+/ •t ''" �+ . + >rs�� iK�- . - �.� a. ,+ ,�'7■■j Mfr•f A Rill ar 1 - yam,��:� , 7a- '+ .3--Jt� .r,t} _ i i a... '1,n.,���~ j71 PW ,, .. .J' -'� �kl■} �_� � A �7■■.- .' r... �f 14sy}.;; F4 � �r�... �#a!!•q--'1 1�, T r b■ �■�■ 3 t • M w4 * • .! r � t I;wf, to j e -�a1n r tF J p`p�+,i - .1r. *.+� ! .\^.Y _ � r v { ��'�•-. � ' If�':.x..r, ��r E � �'`s.�;r c a h a�Lr�.�+ �,� � J Aw AL 'I�L � 1 •'R���.��' ±, �1 "7 • � � .'Y r1. �'e i,��T� � it '1 ■� c! ���rrr"' �� _ J. 40 J! !*.7 �* aaa +jL �+-' 1. ' V. • '� `lam 1p 46.1 �� �it ��,�!r7. , .:� �� �''�''f J.�� 4� j r � •�.yr �-.: ti Of �« � • f -rY,'f'-'+.:- -,�,," , ;i,rr�ar�� ���'�,,�"�■��+1. I� ,jZi' �.r�k = fF�'� �L jil JI i T, *t' Wf ;� �t+f •, .:■t�4 - - ..�3 J:! J + • a , ,! y • t , �, _ fi ■rte rte` 4 1, L _ F AI '� int ,�• "'•�"+� 1`- # i i r STAKE #71 E �r T i • 1r ._: ../r 1 't_` �y ��- I rL` ' fir.,1r:6. r ♦ .r 1�i .:�i 7M►'_t�.#! _ _._: .- !fes �.�Z +..`r • 1 > r sal �... � r e,. � t �4~« �sr ! I i •'�� � V ���,.r ` ' r "d� fR ijr t7 t ,{� 7 �-_ z' .r. ! _:. -.,rte' c .. ✓_ ' - X !G FiC )ARD OF APPEACS ! • _ 1 _ _+ • +•'TM' _..mow._ zi' 2 !1, .,4 �.�'r�x_ r �. Y". - i. r f ��Agr ^-{_per.. �'ti • M'r'. �""..i _� _ ''��'�' �` _ •„f:l.�'Ss �_ r ��t s yy. a �!"�!.J i•�"�■«:�3_ +"3y' P J `y + `''�j 4 1IPLP' t •_ i�. "moi .l""-i. *.f � � � ■�` * f t ����� �rte-, *s 1 tvi ! y �?" i '�— i4~+fe '•tiff o ,� A J r',ir� a �� . .�,r`x�..�'.''Jr �tis�.■',.^,`-�'. w g� � �-ter" " •���liir -.�'��� �!...,�+' . ,.,,;. a �c•i� +��' a'. ..r ` !i P' Jf Wit: � si'�■ t ����+' -, ' +�!�yw, _ .yam•Ll •. .rt .� R.' VIA. J � 'f.�T IN �1► fit ' ter. r_ - s ■1 �' yam. : T ;; - I _ k Am 2a Ar .W6 dr op y `� r ,�' .meq � +■ � 'r 411 •'rix r .j AIR f JR � � r STAKE #8 J '16 �.� , IL IL I JOR • J{ 4 � r+ •, a 1��• '`.ir4' 1 " '^ A 4{. '►;+ia'■""7�I' `' ' g ?c%x' •.v IRT _ 1 L:+r•Z7 el • � s+w { it ,) ' - _ +a ..}Y - , • , • N .. ■ • t • ■ F Ot t, '., y .�. ,.. T. o ✓. �. {{ a'•�4'r � Y ' '\ #Y `_' - 3 S►.- { ,��tee, - -{• ni ir IP Nor °, "��- :- �5. ', �'"�''''�' + ■ i. .-.•.,mac,/ ' i!'`if} �.11 ,(d � s, �!{ i � •y s 1, �• s�w��r +Y,, .� r �. { `�{�i^'����r�' � a +s f �■•'�}�'��l<i+l���'•rf>��If�a.} � �{�^... �'�,J Jay., _ ; •. ��}'� ��y ��j^� ���. x�,e,. I..r : +y r}i jm* ro mr.`'! T �.f'� 4 arra 1 y •� 'tit i � iy c t • 'caJ'`,t�`r'-' '�C r• r�ty..r•s_ ■ 1 �!'r� F -•�C' '{�! UO►T • :J! i '"' f _ i,,,�..r,�i�11 ,etc 14 �A'� 'i y{_ ••�* .,,� ■ . 1� 7F q� �� '�`�'Y -irk :�Ai'jhy ..�r 4• ' `' rtR�, >lr'� 'c '_I` ' tr .1 LLO ;,' '•Ptr �-� 1. c`� T- {'ri ` �. ir,4�j,s �•,*�1 �• '; {' +�- 9r d- IST.'•'• 7�! Ir '� -}' C. ��`_ �c _�^ x^ '.!� a'a'r4r ■�■ r• .��1 �,�a n f•. -,!� rlr�. � !. i � y s.t �. • ■��rAa .. ■ $ � +a� � � `J'fir; rip Wit � - -,. -i',.: ■ .!' f •}'.`•` ` i' as -L%; r 'EL 60 r .,� �*,,,,. .� 1.- { _+•,ate 6 a4 y._ �,t !f 7a it dict _;* r �..,'■ i 'r—��1,y� r' r { • �xi�_i � ^ t M1 aul �....c 1 f "'' �. �•-f +��- !'g4�.IYIT"� _ IF Ow `` y� Ol STAKE #9 i �} op �'�, F ' 1p ` .M LO r ! - r err i ` r 1 - �� �� .� " �; x-•�r 'a , IL .. '• 9NVIS ice rw Ip 41 op `M �� � , ' i' t '—fes► t�yr ��{ t * �{ ■ i' • 7y r . v 3 f j I. M. T{ a 3 ,s yL lk,op r , ' � +1 i rw - f` s+ �' * 1 iY• i`1 '+ '. 4 yy '• .� f •' 1 . 4-6 ar .' + r Thi , ` .s '•per - .6 V. # `1 _ • rf {'t I ," .t�Y1 r, - It ON ! r ff r �.�J y , yr i � rr ' IIW ILS s ofr ��a'� �* � .r '�-+/...� i" ��'- Y. ,-�► J fir.ME • _., n �.. �� , • '�.� I �r�r— iri Try � x rte..'• , ,K� �"-� so ��%N;, ,ti- •. " 03 ' �: i -w L M+. �y• ' "•,.. `��_._.}�T i r i' +' Pad � -h .Nm* IN _ •q T . '_1',7„rr. 'M! 1 d : * �. a�••. r �r i. er`.' ;jam. : 'r� x'"ver t 4 , , f ° ;► � �, �, . ��,�: ,*,�•, r r� r j . ' •' r •'.a - ' _ i - r a �5 -. 4 1 .`� ' y 'i+F+!'�-•" ''" `,��� r k 4f'' i.^� .� ti ` - a°'�.h �Lei � �, � � Y �f +Jf; � parr,"g1�`, a rJ � - d a. _ '.IF• .° x !A op . f - IN t AI i''r. 71 4L �: �#'� �''_ �� t'y''�." ._ , �r � ii...arF.� i� +* .�_ r`•� �."��i` .'!S�� �. 3 sa{'.16.+'i�� .,.f,.. .. r , a � d /•.. � � � w '� yam, .p � y� • ��� 1 •r ,� r s •r IAIN iN < dx • . RECEIVE - . ' • ..., AP , �},+ �����gnt .� � r a , + .. •�': i•LI,�� �- ..fid' ;��� r �_�CrNING BOARD OF_'� �i-.. sT�'••!* ,�� �'i�a �!" '"^ •� JA'°K r�` ♦ • days; pp .. � 1F !�.y,r.,• +.,� ' • dam'h••'.a r i.. w M4 �, .• i 44, An jyS-��.e+ ...f %.. Kaq.ri '.•• �. * r.r ' '!a 4 •dam,ar r rdWlr « [K • i awl' a'.•- nor d°s. a is • rF' « .rte . :� '�. • a'�• •.. � ` ' , y , K �M ft • -.� •.`yj. ��� .•� i s .. .,�it•4 � � .� t �+ ,' .'�• - + d-1 t _ +•+ 41 ALP .16 .. t . � �`[y,,���, sr - R t, y� �� � sj-i. �, •( ��`'.' 4 A�*ys , •r �� . 1 ii. fir.- d � +♦ s�74�.q,�. f_ � e� !Lk 4r a - •** .•« •*lam I ♦ .d Z `` � ,y j ` f w - y Rrd0. ., • ��♦ ' Y -6Z" •""� < -3 ,Y •• 1 �,` �N�f N '-# P.• �plt i Aq n d.d 311. • t-ter �- ' �+�+�� • a M!i '�"� ''+�►or ; •� �+ilk � iii< � "+",�• i y '4 _t. STAKE # 10 t ..r�',a• +. ! a E • `�/a� f! �:f• JL-' .•- e''moia►'' l • ` � *� r !r Mme"` , � �_ -' • � • d• '��� k . } jpt ' r - .. fir■ , { - ;, , ., � �{ ' - � �. `' 4r - Lw ... � "�ti�.t • ,� _.�•�����e-'�- 'fit • r , M ' � '• ,• '��� �ykat'.: ?ifs. a� � � Y- y' .`.�-' � tY 4 - ■r- - �.t .y _. w. . A. r�.ba-t«' t� •ar'�,'r � �� �' 1� - '� � � t�' tt a r ` , r` �.�- ■ ; � � J� t i 1 .t r ,' -i f+'�` �a4-�t�>j R`r 1 )Y ;` a r-f I.4"` ''!�'�, ��' 1 �e.l` -. i a ,I. e. ' * � ."i s, +'I� ••i't ' • J +x r !'� � S �,t ��.1 M L ! ! •r.� ,.r j'!+ '}!�:'. ,�4�'�.-'J.;,fi3tr^"•r s L.yrf r'.'i�r!,+wr ►�4i.�. �_ ,.e�-1 C�a'�I�SEryS��'/.,f31yT'�r ,�"3,a�,#7 fS'a+'• d��r_ �t�...-�`r.,�yy.`,�"1�',, �i''}i_R�4:.!�'ii^f;'•saT�•�e�.,'�_•=f�ye1••e�.`f.��',yar-E +!.'�(itr}.-'•.y�`f•.�• •�i� + r �7 t,J .'•j,-,(��ajr$}.+s � �, rt TA -'"e�,� e -+• r x- ,iy._ _+t i"• "'� _ r - - . e r '' ,i "':y+�'t-1�e••ty.,��. .'.�'i #r i .. • T+r 'r V Y • iJ".,'�' ♦+ ,t• I t t c •r a # t �� a1 "� e.+a _ ► � `. .•rte t i' -r � v -•5 .. + . , ,4 ',ra `~, � .• •�ti t ,� ,. .. • �i= -• ,' - _rC � v!tt �+ ';_.r�,� ��Y�•., r/, i.- t •' v r . : F t; La CTS! - `4 - �y � -' �� .e a _ a �� '�t.`'F�.. � �i. t - I�;' �� ... � � � �4.i�CCIY�r+ • `•e� �y� i �Ai R a l ) r . . . +. 0 ZONfNG BOARD OF4PPEALS,� K - wj a •.. a s. � !4 •-�+'?'.' 4 i,. g •"e ; � .. _ - Y�/F'' t� ��� � •) , r !rte t t ■ L� T .. yam• �-r! ,: ��Li'!�}��a ;41,; +e�• `ti r....� �•�:,i., ,a 5•' s. i'•. i ei.. I �.� ' r 4 t.. t_,.wiA�- '+'�• � _ ��+F; '�.� ...��# i�.�e r, , e ... •r'"' - - r.!•'-3 'i �� � r= . 7�=i`�- •. i � ..t ..•`., �19 .� fb ,1 'r �!. ■ ,S ) 11 a; - '-a..._. is-� �y + R _ A� `,,• Y t r �` 7`�_ �� � ' . ." j i fiat � ,.y� � ' '�4� ��{�•..`. rn• =1 t •� w •r jt .# �.. -'� `-,-� .F � � y r � t � •.'"ta - kyr•. • i. r - . �•. 'a.� r � 4..�a .moi •� 4 �r r _�.F.a * t ' " err w �s{• r 9a +_i* ' atlas .. r• � ' � .. ! ._.. . " ` „•,.�•* ��� - �v. �' <. 4 ..s �, '+- � t � •_e{ . •t p` ■. - of f +` �..,� ' �aytr"L. '�• 1tr - � �t,.�,�r •.r4•.�•Ir, ,y,•. � r•'�>i. .;�+�..i� ap+.s 4 • V. aL`tom -Yi: * ,, t 4 a "..er�,�w. , .,r armee►• - 7`r✓• r"�i##�cr'' �`.a Lam" e r �,r• "�.aEI_ •! t,v I I Ii ` ;s "tAir ' 'e syr STAKE # err s,y�� �• '�'�.T 9 f �• It�d - .. � �is AP� 'r 4• ��s'1 .. A At'1_• '11f; tfa'," a 1'r • ''., ...a; •I^i��• '�'_■ ..+1_ s i� .�} '�I� eta_'s r•, ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE,MMC �ai0� Y ®l/,y Town Hall,53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK ® � P.O.Box 1179 W Southold,New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS ® Fax(631)765-6145 MARRIAGE OFFICERy RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER ® Telephone(631)7 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER ®1 �� www.southoldtownny.gov 0 ny.go OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Elizabeth A. Neville DATED: February 3, 2017 RE: Zoning Appeal No. 7046 Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeals No. 7046 for Andrew V. Giambertone &Associates. PC for 56655 Main Road LLC (The Enclaves)-The Application for Special Exception to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. Also enclosed is the Applicant's Project Description, Questionnaire,Agricultural Data Statement, Short Environmental Assessment Form, Applicant/Owner Transactional Disclosure Form, Agent/Representative Transactional Disclosure Form, LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, Board of Zoning Appeals Application Authorization, Certificate of Occupancy, Certificate of Occupancy Nonconforming Premises, Deed, Letter to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals from Andrew V. Giambertone & Associates, Photos With Photo Key, Property Record Card, Transmittal Letters, Southold Planning Board Site Plan Application Form, Computer.Sketch Drawing,Topographical Survey, -Site Plans, Drawings of Proposed Floor&Roofs Plans and Drawings of Proposed Elevations. J i If * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 02/02/17 Receipt#: 216165 Quantity Transactions Reference Subtotal 1 ZBA Application Fees 7046 $1,200.00 Total Paid: $1,200.00 Notes: Payment Type Amount Paid By CK#5717 $1,200.00 Giambertone, Andrew V& Assoc. Southold Town Clerk's Office 53095 Main Road, PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Name: Giambertone, Andrew V&Assoc. 62 Elm Street Huntington, NY 11743 Clerk ID: SABRINA Internal ID:7046 #;,0002176240 STATE OF NEW YORK) )SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Karen Kine of Mattituck,in said county,being duly sworn,says that she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES , a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1 weeks(s),successfully commencing on 03/01/2018 ka 14w� Principal Clerk Sworn to before me this day of RISTIN�VOLINSI NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No. 01V06105050 Qualified in Suffolk County My Commission EXPI1`05 Nbfuery 28,2020 TYPESET. Wed Feb 21 13:41.46 EST 2018 LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY,MARCH 15,2018 PUBLIC HEARING Notification is hereby given to the public that the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals,as lead agency under the State Envi- ronmental Quality Review Act,has issued a "Positive Declaration"and intends on holding a Public Scoping Session and written com- ment period to receive public input as to the necessary scope and content for a Draft Envi- ronmental Impact Statement for the proposed Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant Site Plan/ Special Exception Use Permit. The Public Scoping Session will be held on March 15, 2018 at 5 30 PM at the Town Meeting Hall located at 53095 Main Road,Southold The project is 6.75 acres and is located on the north side of Main Road+/-90 feet west of the intersection of Main Road and Town Har- bor Lane The property address is 56655 Main Road,Southold Plans include the conversion of an existing two-story home into a 74-seat restaurant and construction of a 44-room ho- tel,including four detached cottages. A Draft Scoping Document for the Draft EIS is available for public review at the town's website (https //www. southoldtownny gov/) or can be directly accessed from the Town's Weblink/ Laserfiche file at http//243828228-2040/ weblink/Browse.aspx9dbid=0.A copy can be reviewed Monday through Friday between 8.00 AM and 4.00 PM at the Zoning Board of Appeals Office,Town Hall Annex Building, 54375 Route 25,PO Box 1179, Southold, NY 11971 For additional information, contact Kim Fuentes by telephone at(631)765-1809 or by email atkimf@southoldtownny.gov All writ- ten comments must be submitted electron- ically to kimf@southoldtownnygov or re- ceived by mail by the close of business on Monday March 26,2018 or they will not be considered for the Final Scope of Work Dated.February 15,2018 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LESLIE KANES WEISMAN, CHAIRPERSON BY:Kim E Fuentes 54375 Main Road(Office Location) 53095 Main Road(Mailing/USPS) P.0 Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 2176240 W �l TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF In the Matter of the Application of: MAILINGS The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant Public Scoping for Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SEQRA) Andrew V. Giambertone & Associates, Architects (Name of Applicants) SCTM Parcel# 1000-63-3-15 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK I, Iwona Kodym residing at Bergen Avenue, Mattituck New York,being duly sworn, deposes and says that: On the 27 day of February , 2018 ,I personally mailed at the United States Post Office in Riverhead ,New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in Prepaid envelopes addressed to current property owners shown on the current assessment roll Verified from the official records on file with the (x)Assessors, or( ) County Real Property Office, for every property which abuts and is across a public or private street, or vehicular right-of-way of record, surrounding the applicant's property. (Signatu ) Sy�ornto before , this °dLy Cl 1 a Mary Louise Santacroce Notary Public State of New York J&�� No.01SA6051325 Suffolk County o ary Public Commission Expires Nov.20,2;1% PLEASE list on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper,the lot numbers next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. Thank you. SECTION 7gpnr e ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. / - 0 Print your name and address on the reverse E3 Agent so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, Pr' to e) C. to tt ell or on the front if space permits. ``G,,� I�' (� 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different ram item 19 Yes If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No NKK LLC 30 Hampton Road Southampton, NY 11968 3.II I IIIIII IIII III III I I II II I II II I I VIII II I I III i Service Type ❑Priority Mad Express® 13❑Adult Signature El Registered MatITM ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Re.9istered Mail Restricted 11 Certified Mail® Delivery 9590 9402 2784 6351 2144 45 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return e Receipt for ElCollect on Delivery ise 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label) _ ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTM ❑Signature Confirmation 7 016 2 710 0000 1260 2463 stricted Delivery Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt 4SEN[i • • • • s • ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. s7t� ( ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X PFAgent so that we can return the card to you. dresses i Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, EL c ' edd b rioted e) Date ofleIivery or on the front if space permits. v +v�� b /Y 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Ws Anthony Forgione If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No ' PO Box 1118 Southold, NY 11971 3.III IIII III I III IIIIII IIIIII IIIIII III Service Type ❑ y Mail Expresso 11 ❑ ❑Adult Signature Registered MaiITM ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certified Mail0 Delivery 9590 9402 2784 6351 2145 06 El 9590 Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTm it ❑Signature Confirmation _ ?016 2 710 0000 1260 2401 11 Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt , SENDER, sMPLETE THISsEcTfdfil CoMPLETETHIS •NON DELIV ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Sign re e Print your name and address on the reverse A ent so that we can return the card to you. X ddressee ® Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Received by(Printed Nam) c. to ciDelivery or on the front if space permits. V 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1 LI*-- If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑Wo 56600 Main LLC PO Box 389 Cutchogue, NY 11935 I IIIIII IIII III I III I I II I I II II I III I I I II I III 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mad Express® ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MaiITM ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certified Mail® Delivery 9590 9402 2784 6351 2145 37 ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article Number(Transfer frnm eanilra lahoii ❑Coilert nn nalivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationT ❑Signature Confirmation 7 016 2 710 0000 1260 2371 testricted Delivery Restricted Delivery _ lV VCf PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS4- SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF In the Matter of the Application of: POSTING The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant Draft Public Scoping for Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SEQRA) Andrew V. Giambertone & Associates, Architects (Name of Applicants) SCTM Parcel# 1000-63-3-15 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK I Charles R. Cuddy residing at Marratooka Lane, Mattituck ,New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the 5 day of March , 2018 , 1 personally placed the Town's Official Poster, with the date of hearing and nature of my application noted thereon, securely upon my property, located ten (10) feet or closer from the street or right-of- Way (driveway entrance)—facing the street or facing each street or right-of-way entrance,* and that; I hereby confirm that the Poster has remained in place for seven (7) days prior to the date of the subject hearing date, which hearing date was shown to be March 15, 2018 - Aez�-7, (Signat re Sworn to before me this Day of pmjl20 ie ' )O10?, `£ yoaaW sealdx3 uolssiwwo0 kuno0 �Iojjns ui peiplinp 99£89090>1l0 'oN 31JoA emN P 91a;g 'oilgnd Ae}oN u WAGON VNOMI (Notary Public) * near the entrance or drive ay entrance of my property, as the area most visible to passerby PLEASE list on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. Thank you. t 1 G (W 1 • • A.-SI atur e1 Complete items 1,2,and 3. 0 Agent ; ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X . ❑Addressee so that we can return the card to you. g, Recel d by(Printed Name) Date of Dlivery e ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, I or on the front if space permits. U C"eC13 Yes 1 1. ticl Are Addressed to: D If YES,enter delivery address below:i? ❑No i Eugen Tomasic 1 876 Willis Ave. , Ste. 2 R Albertson, NY 115073. I 4 ❑Priority Mail Express® � j U,Service Type ❑Registered Mall" Signature Signature 1 II Iliill 1H III I III I I II II I 1111111111111111111 Resicted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certified Malla Delivery i ❑Certified Mad Restricted Delivery ❑icted DeliveReturn Receipt for 1 9590 9402 2784 6351 2144 69 MerohandIse ❑Collect on Delivery 13Signature ConfirmationT"' ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery j 2. Article Number(iYansfer from service label)— ^i1 US ignature Confirmation IF-4 4`l 11 Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery ---i 7016 ??1° 000 ° ;126Domestic Return Receipt !, PS Forrm 3$T ,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 t 1 • , . . DELIVER • 1 S1g tur � ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ❑Addressee I so that we can return the card to you: eceived by(Printed Name) t of eery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, i or on the front if space permits. I 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? ❑Y s J If YES,enter delivery address below: ®No Witzke Capital LLC PO Box 937 Southold, NY 11971 f 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mad Express® [[[ 111 II I II I I I I IIII III I II I I I I I II I III II I I II I I II I I I III E0 Adult 3Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted, 13 Certified Mall® Delivery f 9590 9402 2784 6351 2144 38 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTm 2–Artidle-Number_(Transfer from service label) ❑Signature Confirmation t —,❑-Insured Maill ; i a 1 it} Restricted Delivery 7L°16 271'°`°°0°° t 1'26°°'``'24'70 '``'`'1 'aIRestrictedDeliverys 1 i t PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt SEN • • ° . . . s y A. Signature ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. Agent 1 ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ressee so that we can return the card to you. 111111 Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Received by(Printed Name) �Dateelivey i or on the front if space permits. i 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No Joseph F. Krukowski Marilyn Krukowski l 59475 Rte. 25 Southold, NY 11971 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® ' ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered Mail- II I IIIIII,IIII III I III I I I I II( III II I III I I I I II I III ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted 13 Certified Mail® Delivery 9590 9402 2784 6351 2145 13 ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise n Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmationrm 2. Article Number_Mansfer_from_service-labell --- ❑Signature Confirmation ' 7016 ;271❑, 000,0 ;1260, 2395 �1 ated Delivery Restricted Delivery "'S Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt 'm /• Be 0 n 1115 • • • • e .• • zr • • _ o o I M " "S MA ti H S8 •,i Y i • i v 50 � �Yi11� �� ' -0 0 Certified Mad Fee r 0901 t X Certified Mail Fee °4J 0901- .,nu $ - • $3.4,f a F�ttra Services&Fees(check box,add rae are) 12 � r� F�dre Services&Fees(check bmf add tee�pp°rpQgare) 12 C3 ❑Return Recelpt(hardcopy) $ r�!y Q Return Receipt(hardcoPY) $ ►►JJ ll���IJJ - ❑Return Receipt(efeceronic) $—FSS-00 d�,,,m� P„ostmark � Q Retum Recelpt(electronic) $ �+�-Off 1B,tflta C: ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery', $,_ tr nlr__ '�1 9 0 Here C� ❑ a� r.� f �Here d � �rq�q �at � Certified Ma11 Restrlaed Delivery $_,•. .°.� •�r2l j 0 ❑Adult Signature Required $ ' y�'a O []Adult Signature Required $Adult Si nature Restricted Delive $ . ^Q g ry ° ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ � Qb C7 Postage p Postage$0.71 (us $0.71 �',! 27/2018 '� $ 02/ 7SG+i° " +� Total Postage and Fes 1 Total Postage and Fees � � � •' Q rLi $ X6.91 w c, - ni $ ��.91 Str t TNo.,or F'd ox)Vo �f�` r" f` „fl Sent To I�KI� C - ra Anthon .v �u _gtryo(vch - a �r ? � Tamp t on ro ad ------------------- Street lin- - Ji C P 4 nto.- - State;Zl �tYlamptori, NY 11968' criysts7e;ziP+d Manhasset, NX �I00 `� � _-- :er -/— —ra err-.`— :re a rr rr<•.. _ _ . e s I Z_ j 1 C3 ca o •- • • • -e - s- s o 13 N Certified Mail Fee s, 4�r' � g �� i ru Certified Mall Fea $3.45 Cg 0901 p v. $ `rr 117-1 Extra Services&Fees(check box,add tee e,�gp.rgpre) ` W I ra rel ❑ Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ FU rJ EXtra services&Fees(check box,add fee ate)F Ly] C7 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ .�{(„(](] %•�) ❑Retum,Receipt(hardcopy) $ \\\�'�,ff'' t.Lq Q Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ ¢I} rij I r'�;" Pal ti O Q Rehmt Receipt(electronic) $ _ tma 0 ❑Adult Signature Required $ i--- r••� Herb,, C' ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ s F /B Here .66 $ t�\ ❑Adult Signature Required $ ❑Adult Signature Restncted Delivery$ p V , Q Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ ° O Postage $0.71 "°�`� g�,� Q� C7 Postage V-7" s Total Postage andF g1 Tota',Postage and e >3�i C+2/27/2018 i $ •.�'` +� ,$6.91 -a Sent To ..D Sent To a ___Anthon Forgione'_: _ ______ 10170 B ssea�a__Av(a--�0---------- O Street A- o.-or-- Alo. , . � - ,ted � o ff� Q Sy4F_L A at oria�x r. -- - - City State.ZIP+4$ --------------------------------------------------------------------- • City Siete ZiP+4�--------------------------------------------------------'--=-•------- I Southold NY 11971 Brook n NY 11234 •• ==W1012; :r r r .. 011•. f M1 00 � '• ' m m ru • •- -a Certified Mail Fee � g c .M Certified Mail Fee $ ,P`tt $_:;.,., ',3.4� 0901 1 ti $ 0901 S Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,addree pr ata) 12 ' Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,edd tee a ra) r^ 12 I ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ ( Q [a ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ + a'`F't ❑ Return Receipt(electronic) $ nCT _ I$$tmSa Q will_+— �PoStmr^� O ❑Retum Recelpt(electronic) $ tk_fl _ J• C7 ❑Certified Mall Restricted De4very $ _G , ere Q Q Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ & i y_ Mare []Adult Signature Required $ wwv—�— I r3 Q Adult Signature Required $--- �l • ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ �g•r-+� { ��\� QAdult Signature Restricted Delivery$ C7 Postage Postage 1 Total Postage and Fees �0 /201$ L +'' Total Postage and Fees V�/ Uj $ $6.91 �if�®- ��Q� �[Seit - .$6.91 '"-���r .•� Sent To .-� Ta a56Fi00 Ma_in__ LLC_____ au.thlan.ld_C.Ox Attn:._Ad__�ZalQrem:_Tax____C7 St.�. A�p£N r C7 hoz 1Vo. ^•------------------ -- C7 t and Apt No.,or PO Box o.Y� OX �� Po Box 71_1wSrarePCutcfiogue; NY-�t� 5 - - tate;zla+wallas, TX 75221-9867 56655 Main Rd. LLC -The Enclaves SCTM#1000-63-3-15 1. SCTM#1000-63-3-3 Long Island Railroad Co. Jamaica Station Jamaica,NY 11435 2. SCTM#1000-63-3-1.1 1070 Boisseau Ave LLC 2412 National Dr. Brooklyn,New York 11234 3. SCTM#1000-63-3-28.1 Witzke Capital LLC PO Box 937 Southold,New York 11971 4. SCTM#1000-63-3-12 NKK LLC 30 Hampton Road Southampton,New York 11968 5. SCTM#1000-63-3-13 Jorge Torrento 56365 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 6. SCTM#1000-63-3-14 Eugen Tomasic 876 Willis Avenue, Ste. 2 Albertson,New York 11507 7. SCTM#1000-63-3-16 Lauren E. Barry 157 Columbia St. Brooklyn,NY 11231-1401 TMU.S. Postal ServiceU. •s7 d © RECEIPT Oo e■ a s. e Er p- m �- Ar ru SOUTtOLt� e „ .- - . , Certified Mall Fee $� � ,� Certified Mail Fes ru-$ 0901 ;ru $ $3.45 A 1,9 j[-9 il Extra services f2 77c; &Fees(checkba,y add fee app te) 1 1 Extra Services&Fees(checkbox addles ate) 1 O ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) - $ U■ O ❑Retum Recelpt(hardcopy) O ❑Retum Recelpt(electronic) $ t}j)} (((� ❑Rstum Recelpt(electronlc)� , $_ } qq� CI �osere O Q■�� PosTmark l [:3 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery- $ d<ftT_ fit, ere {1, 0 ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery- $ d•A °1A l ❑Adult Signature Required $ ry r,n �cTrL•v ere O O ❑Adult Signature Required $ ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ :V4""- '� �` ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ je p Postage tL �� O Postage ;X ,a $0.71 $ $0.71 ru $ � 2018 I rrUU Total Postage and Fees Total Postage and Fe a ����7f�01 v "( $$.91 1 f $ „ ��� ,g � $ $6.91 .n Sent To �� I .A Sent To Ill -Jsz � _h_._ --1 era�p__Krukoraski. _•` ''q _long__Is�nd..Razlxaa�L__Cn-•-------•-------- CI street an or O Box N ----==--_ O Stye arAp%No.,or O Box(11o. - -- =- - r` � �+ l�te. 5 r\ �amaica SPtation -----tate,ZlPj q 3 ' Crty State,Z%P+4�----------------------------------------------------------------- Southold IVY 11971 ---�------ Jamaica NY 11435 ON:ee . ee see•e, :ee , TM e e see•e• ' e 1 MAILO I ru ) • Jim ®. Only Er f o ` =' _ _r Apo e ru __J_p e G , ru e I O 1 (g�{ [g�) AL"TQHr Y 1 0� i .-D Certified Mail Fee $-+ 45 ' TOT ,a � s. 0901 eU Certified Mall Fee Scl I $ ru X3.45 _ 1 Extra Seryices&Fees P>�kb $ � 1 r-� ❑ turn Receipt te) Extra SeNICBS&Fees(checkbay add lee 0901 O (hardco ) $ ■ �� 19 O ❑Retum Recelpt(hardcopy) $ , ate) 1,2 ❑Return Receipt electronic r3 ❑Certified Mall Restricted Deliveryi, Postmark `q O ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ + C3 ❑Adult Signature Required $ (a Here 1t� d ❑Certified Mall Restricted Deliver, $_dry ry,ti /nom OSt 8rk (I ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery 0 ❑Adak Signature Requirodss �k�~— ore" CT"Postage r 1J N, r ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ r'-'•u[1—fit ~ �0 r a $0,71 tti L C7 Postage r- $ �> a,' $ . $0.71 r�= ���% r1iTotal Postage ande�■91 02/27/201 .�� JW Total Postage and Fees � $ $6.91 Null/2013 Sent To � �. $ �r� t r-1 -- -u Sent To ! A Laurin _�_. Bsx_ 8y Egua Street t1yp q g N. - S%- d -4�RQID+�5 z%C( -r (:OlUm�la St. TUM 0 , %'E it°lis o. — srare;zilw ---- ve. _ ------------ rookl n Crty,bYate Z%P+4s Ste:2 11231-1401 --�-----' Albertson NY, ---1 1--1 --50 7-7--------------------- U.S. Postal-Service" U'S.i Post alServi CERTIFIED o RECEIPT ice Ln o. . CERTIFIED e■ ti �- o SOI71PIff 1""" 5 A L US NUri T e ru ° D Certified Mad Fee 0 Ae r $ -, $3.45 . 0901 e n Certified Mail Fee $3■45 12 ru $ 0901 Extra Services&Fees(cheekbox add fee r ate) r'� ,�9 ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ eF ) xtra Services&Fees(check box add fee e p te) 12 ! ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $. 0.00 Postmark O ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ ,' O ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $_ Here ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ ❑Adult Signature Required $ — 1 bre O ❑COrb led Mall Restricted Delivery $ dry �jrr ( P&;ark ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ ■U Vr02/,2,k/918 1 1 9O ❑Adult Signature gegWred $ r,y A°$0.71 - JrP❑ge Signature R :Delivery$O Postageowl Postage and Fees [ti $$6.91Total Postage and Fqs 91 �w02%271 l"il $ ` 1 . � Sent To $ J-0-r, E___TS�x_ sato ----------------- \>/ Q� { rq Sent To St -J f pr.No,pr Po oxnl °6; r WYtzke_Ca- tal__LLC_ r'- 7���� Main load �---� f, / M1 s%%earand gb?NOXO�°��° ---------------------- ------------------------- --------------------- crty,srare,zrP+a�-------------------------- ----s.----------- , City,State Z%P+46 - � Southold ---�----�-�" _�b • e ee eee•e NY 11971 :I e 1 e I ale•e. MHHOII�n�1 Vrn1�I' ° ,�IfIIh1L° a1t7@mj CD 8. SCTM#1000-63-3-17.2 � �SOUTH 'to ��a� •a -� , 1TA L, Anthony Zustovich _aCertified Mail] PO Box 869 ! ru $ X3.45 �� 0 ,_ ,��77 r"q Extra SeNloes&Fees(checkbox,add fee I ' Manhasset,New York 11030 ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $— t1PP �'g) 0 O Return Receipt(electmnlc) $ f} i}(� 1 \1 O ❑Certified Mail Restncted Delivery $ � t Postmv 9. SCTM#1000-63-3-17.4 0 ❑Adult Signature Required $ zt ®CV ee !� ❑Adult Signature Restricted Dlivery$ C3 !C Bilal Altinto rak '� $ $0.71 a��� `' P rri- Total Postage and Fees 11212712 (1 V PO Box 1690 $ $6.91 —p Sent To Southold,New York 11971 i -1 _____Hilal_Alti.litograk__________________ O St restBr6dAftOX,oir BJ1XNo. YV 11byV 10. SCTM#1000-63-3-17.3 C�rystate;Z%P+4®Southold, -NY 11971 ---------------"" Anthony Forgione PO Box 1118 Southold,New York 11971 11. SCTM#1000-63-3-24 Joseph F. Krukowski Marilyn Krukowski 59475 Rte. 25 Southold,NY 11971 12. SCTM#1000-62-3-37 Southland Corp. Attn. Ad Valorem Tax PO Box 711 Dallas, TX 75221-9867 13. SCTM#1000-62-3-38 56600 Main LLC PO Box 389 Cutchogue,New York 11935 CHARLES R.CUDDY ATTORNEY AT LAW 445 GRIFFING AVENUE RIVERHEAD,NEW YORK Mailin¢Address: TEL: (631)369-8200 P.O.Box 1547 FAX. (631)369-9080 Riverhead,NY 11901 E-mail- charlescuddy@optonline.net March 8, 2018 Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town zop PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Attn: Kim Fuentes Re: The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant-Draft Public Scoping for DEIS SCTM#1000-63-3-15 Dear Ms. Fuentes: We are enclosing the Affidavit of Posting and Affidavit of Mailing,in connection with a hearing scheduled for March 15, 2018, along with green/white receipts and the green signature cards. Please make it part of your file. Very truly yours, CRC:ik Charles R. Cuddy Enclosures Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signa , - ■ Print your name and address on the reverse � � Addnessee so that we can return the card to you. s J , , B. Received by(Printed Name) 9 Date of,Dehvery -■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, �e� or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different fro '1? ❑Yes Bilal Altintoprak If YES,enter delivery address lo ❑ ,�3��/ PO Box 1690 �_ Southold, NY 11971 3. III 111111 III III I III I III II 111111 I I III Service Type ❑Priority Md Express® 13 ❑Adult Signature El Registered MaiITM ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certified Mail® Delivery 9590 9402 2784 6351 2144 90 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label) ❑Collect on Da,,—Restricted Delivery 11 Signature ConfirmationTM ❑Signature Confirmation ?01-6 2 710 0000 1260 2 418 �d Delivery Restricted Delivery PS Form ,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. Teceitvrd ri Print your name and address on the reverse Agent so that we can return the card to you. Addressee' ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, anted Nary e) C.Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes 1070 Boisseau Ave. LLC If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No 2412 National Dr. Brooklyn, NY 11234 II I I III II II III I III II��I II II I IIII II I III 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mall Express® ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MaiIT" 13Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certified MBIIO Delivery 9590 9402 2784 6351 2143 77 L3 Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article Numberransfer from service label)_-_ _ __ ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery El Signature ConfirmationT _ —----– ❑Signature Confirmation ?016 2 710 0000 1260 248? tricted Delivery Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt TYPESET Yj�d Oct 09 09 44 13 EDT 2019 LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY,NOVEMBER 7,2019 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN,pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Town Code Chapter 280(Zoning),Town of South- old,the following public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 11971-0959, on THURSDAY, NOVEM- BER 7,2019. 5:00 P.M.—Request for Special Exception and the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) prepared for The En- claves Hotel and Restaurant#7046-The project is 6.75 acres and is located on the north side of Main Road+/-90 feet west of the intersection of Main Road and Town Harbor Lane The property address is 56655 Main Road,Southold.Plans include the conversion of an existing two-story home into a 74-seat restaurant and construction of a 44-unit hotel, including four detached cottages upon a par- cel located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, NY, particularly known as Suffolk County Tax Map No 1000-63-3-15. A copy of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement is available for public review at the town's website (https•//www southoldtownny,govor can be directly accessed from the Town's Weblink/ Laserfiche file at http,//southoldtownny.gov/ 1298/Environmental-Impact-Statement A hardcopy can be reviewed Monday through Friday between 8.00 AM and 4.00 PM at the Office of the Town Clerk at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold,at the Zoning Board of Appeals Office,Town Hall Annex Building,54375 Route 25,Southold,or at the Southold Free Library,temporarily located at the Feather Hill Shopping Center on Main Road,Southold, The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives,desiring to be heard at each hearing,and/or desiring to submit writ- ten statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above Written comments on the DEIS will be accepted at the Zoning Board of Appeals Office or via email(sent to kimf@ southoldtownny,gov)until a minimum of 10 days after the public hearing(close of busi- ness November 18,2019) If you have ques- tions, please contact our office at (631) 765-1809, or by email kimf@ southoldtownny.gov Dated:October 10,2019 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LESLIE KANES WEISMAN, CHAIRPERSON By Kim E Fuentes 54375 Main Road(Office Location) 53095 Main Road(Mailing/USPS) PO.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 2406270 #0002406270 STATE OF NEW YORK) )SS: 9� COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Kimberly Gersic of Mattituck, in said county,being duly sworn, says that she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES ,a weekly newspaper,published at Mattituck,in the Town of Southold,County of Suffolk and State of New York,and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1 weeks(s),successfully commencing on 10/24/2019 Principal Clerk Sworn to before me this day of CHRISTINA VOLiNIS K; NOTARY?UBLIC-STATE ON NEW YORK • No 01V06105050 Qualified in Sutfoik County My Commissm Expires February 28,2020 0 BOARD MEMBERS OF SO(/ryO Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora T; Office Location: Eric Dantes �O Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. �l,Y 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento COO +� Southold,'NY'11.1,971' http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2019 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Town Code Chapter 280 (Zoning), Town of Southold, the following public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971-0959, on THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2019. 5:00 P.M. — Request for Special Exce tion and t Environmental Impact Statement DEIS re ared for The Enclaves Hotel and Restauran #7046 he project is 6.75 acres and is located on the north side of Main Road +/-90 feet west o he inte section of Main Road and Town Harbor Lane. The property address is 56655 Main Road, old. Plans include the conversion of an existing two-story home into a 74-seat restaurant and construction of a 44-unit hotel, including four detached cottages upon a parcel located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, NY, particularly known as Suffolk County Tax Map No. 1000-63-3-15. A copy of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement is available for public review at the town's website (https://www.southoldtownny.-gov/) or can be directly accessed from the Town's Weblink/Laserfiche file at http://southoldtownny.gov/1298/Environmental-Impact-Statement. A hardcopy can be reviewed Monday through Friday between 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM at the Office of the Town Clerk at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, at the Zoning Board of Appeals Office; Town Hall Annex Building, 54375 Route 25, Southold, or at the Southold Free Library, temporarily located at the Feather Hill Shopping Center on Main Road, Southold. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives, desiring to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Written comments on the DEIS will be accepted at the Zoning Board of Appeals Office or via email (sent to kimf@southoldtownny.gov) until a minimum of 10 days after the public hearing (close of business November 18, 2019). If you have questions, please contact our office at(631) 765-1809, or by email: kimf@southoldtownny.gov Dated: October 10, 2019 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LESLIE KANES WEISMAN, CHAIRPERSON By: Kim E. Fuentes 54375 Main Road (Office Location) 53095 Main Road (Mailing/USPS) P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 ONING BOARD OF APPEALS MAILING ADDRESS and PLACE OF HEARINGS: 53095 Main Road, Town Hall Building, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 (631) 765-1809 Fax 765-9064 LOCATION OF ZBA OFFICE: Town Hall Annex 1st Floor J 54375 Main Road and Youngs Avenue, Southold website: lam://southtown.northfork.net September 30 , 2019 Re: Town Code Chapter 55 -Public Notices for Thursday, November 7, 2019 Hearing - 56655 MAIN RD . LLC, (THE ENCLAVES) Dear Sir or Madam: Please find enclosed a copy of the Legal Notice describing your recent application. The Notice will be published in the next issue of The Suffolk Times. 1) Before October 21St: Please send the enclosed Legal Notice, with both a Cover Letter including your telephone number and a copy of your signed, sealed and dated Survey or Site Plan (filed with this application) which shows the new construction area or other request, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, to all owners of property (tax map with property numbers enclosed), vacant or improved, which abuts and any property which is across from any public or private street. Use the current owner name and mailing address shown on the assessment rolls maintained by the Southold Town Assessors' Office. If you know of another address for a neighbor, you may want to send the notice to that address as well. If any letter is returned to you undeliverable, you are requested to make other attempts to obtain a mailing address or to deliver the letter to the current owner, to the best of your ability, and to confirm how arrangements were made in either a written statement, or during the hearing, providing the returned letter to us as soon as possible: AND not later than October 24th : Please either mail or deliver to our office your Affidavit of Mailing (form enclosed) with parcel numbers, names and addresses noted, along with the green/white receipts postmarked by the Post Office. When the green signature cards are returned to you later by the Post Office, please mail or deliver them to us before the scheduled hearing. If any envelope is returned "undeliverable", please advise this office as soon as possible. If any signature card is not returned, please advise the Board during the hearing and provide the card (when available). These will be kept in the permanent record as proof of all Notices. 2) Not Later October 24th : Please make arrangements to place the enclosed Poster on a signboard such as cardboard, plywood or other material, posting it at the subject property seven (7) days (or more) prior to hearing. (It is the applicant/agents responsibility to maintain sign until Public Hearing) Securely place the sign on your property facing the street, not more than 10 feet from the front property line bordering the street. If you border more than one street or roadway, an extra sign is supplied for posting on both front yards. Please deliver or mail your Affidavit of Posting for receipt by our office before November 4, 2019. If you are not able to meet the deadlines stated in this letter, please contact us promptly. Thank you for your cooperation. (PLEASE DISPLAY YOUR HOUSE NUMBER ALWAYS). Very truly yours, Zoning Appeals Board and Staff Ends. DRAFT SCOPE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT THE ENCLAVES 56655 MAIN ROAD,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK January 31,2018 Overview This document is a Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement(DEIS) for a Special Exception Use Permit for a hotel and restaurant (sit-down) to be located at 56655 Main Road (State Route 25) in the hamlet of Southold,Town of Southold,Suffolk County,New York(the"subject property"). The subject property is 6.75±acres and designated as Suffolk County Tax Map No.: District 1000-Section 63-Block 3-Lot 15. The proposed action,designated as"The Enclaves,"includes the construction of a two-story hotel with 40 units that will range in size from 500 square feet(so to 540 sf,and four (4) separate cottages,each with an area of 592- sf. Amenities for the proposed hotel include an outdoor swimming pool and patio area. Also proposed is the conversion of an existing single-family residential structure fronting Main Road to a 74-seat, sit-down restaurant. The proposed hotel,cottages and restaurant would include the respective parking spaces. The proposed action is subject to permits and approvals from the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) (Special Exception Use Permit), Town of Southold Planning Department (site plan), Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) (Article 6 Permit), New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) (Highway Work Permit) and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) (sewage discharge permit and State Pollution Discharge Elimination System [SPDES] permit). The Suffolk County Planning Commission (SCPC) has General Municipal Law Section 239-m planning review authority over the proposed action. Public water and utility service connections are also required from the Suffolk County Water Authority(SCWA),and PSEG Long Island and National Grid,respectively. In April 2017, the applicant submitted an application for The Enclaves, which included Part 1 of the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) and related application materials, including preliminary site development plans,architectural plans,and elevations. On October 4,2017,the applicant filed a revised Part 1 EAF to address project and data changes. On June 29, 2017,the ZBA commenced coordinated review with the potentially involved agencies. On November 16, 2017,the ZBA declared itself lead agency, classified the proposed action as "Unlisted" and adopted a Positive Declaration. To ensure that the DEIS will address all significant issues,the ZBA has elected to conduct formal scoping pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act(SEQRA) regulations set forth at 6 NYCRR§617.8. This Draft Scope provides a description of the proposed action and the proposed content for the DEIS,based upon the EAF - Parts 2 and 3 prepared by the consultants to the ZBA and used as the Determination of Significance(Positive Declaration). This Draft Scope has been prepared in accordance with 6 NYCRR§617.8(f) and sets forth the following: • Brief description of the proposed action • Potentially significant adverse impacts • Extent and quality of information needed to adequately address potentially significant adverse impacts • Initial identification of mitigation measures • Reasonable alternatives to be considered 1 Draft Scope-Draft Environmen�e_. :..pact Statemen t January 31,2018 The Enclaves-56655 Main Road,Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York Description of the Proposed Action The subject property is a 6.75±-acre parcel located on the north side of Main Road,approximately 90 feet west of the intersection of Main Road and Town Harbor Lane in the Town of Southold. The property is zoned"Hamlet Business"and is currently developed with a two-story,single-family residence,detached garage and two sheds. Surrounding land uses include commercial and residential uses. The majority of the subject property(6.62± acres)is undeveloped and consists of land cover associated with the former agricultural use,maintained lawn and landscaping,as well as perimeter woodlands. The proposed action includes the conversion and renovation of the existing single-family residence to a 74- seat,sit-down restaurant. As part of the proposed conversion,the applicant it proposing to connect the 3,339±- sf residential structure to the existing adjacent shed by way of a 519-sf addition. The remaining shed would be removed. Dedicated parking would be situated to the north and west of the proposed restaurant and would consist of 25 spaces and two (2)ADA spaces. The proposed action also includes the development of a two-story, 44-unit hotel with associated appurtenances,including an outdoor,in-ground swimming pool,poolside cabanas,small decorative pond,and a dedicated parking area. The proposed development includes a hotel building with 40 rooms ranging in sizes between 500 sf and 540 sf,and four(4)detached cottages,each with an area of 594 sf. Parking for the proposed hotel would be situated to the west and north of the building and would consist for 88 spaces and four(4)ADA spaces,with an additional four(4) spaces for the cottages. Site access is proposed to be provided via the existing driveway located on the east side of the current residence (proposed restaurant) and a new curb cut for site egress is proposed on the west side of the current residence (proposed restaurant). As explained later in this Draft Scope,a complete traffic and parking,analysis will be included in the DEIS. As part of the proposed site design,new trees,shrubs and ground cover would be planted throughout the site, including the placement of dense buffering along the east and west sides of the subject property. The proposed landscaping plan would also include a hedgerow along the north side of the internal driveway at the extent where it separates the restaurant and hotel portions of the overall property. An existing on-site irrigation well would remain. It is anticipated that public water to serve the site would be provided by the SCWA. Sanitary waste is proposed to be proposed to be handled with an advanced on-site sewage treatment facility to be constructed at the northern extent of the subject property. As explained later in this Draft Scope, water and sewer demand projections will be presented in the DEIS and consultations will be undertaken with the SCWA. An analysis of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code as it relates to the maximum permitted sanitary density and the proposed sewage treatment facility will also be included in the DEIS. Site utility connections,including electricity and natural gas,would be required from PSEG Long Island and National Grid, respectively. As part of the DEIS, consultations will be undertaken with both utility suppliers. The proposed action includes a comprehensive stormwater management plan consisting of drainage catch basins and subsurface leaching pools to accommodate all stormwater on the subject property. As explained later in this Draft Scope,stormwater generation,volume projections and drainage design will be presented in the DEIS. Compliance with the relevant local and State regulations will also be included in the DEIS. 2 Draft Scope-Draft Environmene.,.,,!pact Statement January 31,2018 The Enclaves-56655 Main Road,Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York In order to implement the proposed action,the following approvals are required: Agency Permit/Approval Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Special Exception Use Permit Town of Southold Planning Board Site Plan Review and Approval Suffolk County Department of Health Services Article 6 Permit Suffolk County Planning Commission 239-m Referral Suffolk County Water Authority Public Water Service Connection New York State Department of Environmental Sewage Discharge Permit and State Pollutant Discharge Conservation Elimination System(SPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharge during Construction Activities New York State Department of Transportation Highway Work Permit PSEG Long Island/National Grid Electric and Natural Gas service connections The section of the DEIS entitled Description of the Proposed Action will provide a thorough description of the existing conditions on the approximately 6.75±-acre subject property and the proposed action.The Description of the Proposed Action section of the DEIS will specifically include information relating to the following: • Project location,setting,land use,and zoning,with appropriate maps and aerial photographs • Summary of the surrounding land uses and zoning • Physical characteristics of the site, including property acreage, site covertypes (e.g., pervious and impervious areas),and existing structures • Project layout and design,including information about the proposed development,zoning compliance, changes in site covertypes,site landscaping and screening,access,circulation,and parking • Infrastructure requirements,including water supply,wastewater treatment,drainage,and utilities • Project Purpose,Need and Benefits • Projected construction schedule • Description of the preliminary operations • Required local,county and state approvals Potentially Significant Adverse Ind The DEIS will be prepared in accordance with the Final Scope promulgated by the lead agency and in accordance with 6 NYCRR §617.9(b). Based upon review of the site, architectural plans and elevations, site plans and the EAF Part 1, a combined Part 3 Attachment and Determination of Significance (Part 3 Attachment/Positive Declaration) was prepared, and issued by the ZBA on November 16, 2017. The Part 2 EAF and Part 3 Attachment/Positive Declaration identified potential moderate to large impacts within the following impact categories: Land, Surface Water, Groundwater, Flooding, Plants and Animals, Aesthetic Resources, Historic and Archaeological Resources, Transportation, Noise, Odor and Light, Human Health, Consistency with Community Plans,and Consistency with Community Character. 3 Draft Scope-Draft Environmen,:......ipact Statement January 31,2018 The Enclaves-56655 Main Road, Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York The DEIS will fully address the identified potential significant adverse impacts,as well as other relevant issues. Where the impact analyses conducted in the DEIS indicate the potential for significant adverse impacts, the DEIS will set forth measures to mitigate those impacts. The proposed outline of the DEIS is set forth below, followed by a description of each section. I Proposed DEIS Outline CI , Cover Page 6 Table of Contents Executive Summary Introduction Description of the Proposed Project Potential Impacts Proposed Mitigation Measures Alternatives and Their Anticipated Impacts Permits and Approvals Required 1.0 Description of the Proposed Action 1.1 Project Location and Site Conditions 1.2 Project Design and Layout 1.3 Project Objectives and Benefits 1.4 Construction and Operations 1.5 Required Permits and Approvals 2.0 Natural Environmental Resources 2.1 Soils 2.1.1 Existing Conditions 2.1.2 Potential Impacts 2.1.3 Proposed Mitigation 2.2 Water Resources 2.2.1 Existing Conditions 2.2.2 Potential Impacts 2.2.3 Proposed Mitigation 2.3 Ecological Resources 2.3.1 Existing Conditions 2.3.2 Potential Impacts 2.3.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.0 Human Environmental Resources 3.1 Land Use,Zoning and Plans 3.1.1 Existing Conditions 3.1.2 Potential Impacts 3.1.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.2 Transportation 3.2.1 Existing Conditions 3.2.2 Potential Impacts 3.2.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.3 Aesthetic Resources and Community Character 3.3.1 Existing Conditions 3.3.2 Potential Impacts 3.3.3 Proposed Mitigation 4 Draft Scope-DraftEnvironmen—,,,,,pact Statement January3l,2018 The Enclaves-56655 Main Road,Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York 3.4 Noise and Odor 3.4.1 Existing Conditions 3.4.2 Potential Impacts 3.4.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.5 Historic and Archaeological Resources 3.5.1 Existing Conditions 3.5.2 Potential Impacts 3.5.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.6 Human Health 3.6.1 Existing Conditions 3.6.2 Potential Impacts 3.6.3 Proposed Mitigation 4.0 Other Required Sections 4.1 Use and Conservation of Energy 4.2 Adverse Impacts That Cannot Be Avoided(Short-Term and Long-Term) 4.3 Irretrievable and Irreversible Commitment of Resources 4.4 Growth-Inducing Impacts 5.0 Alternatives and Their Impacts 5.1 Alternative 1: No-Action 5.2 Alternative 2: Permitted Use Plan 6.0 References Figures Appendices 5 Draft Scope-Draft Environmen6�a.::,pact Statement January31,2018 The Enclaves-56655 Main Road,Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York Natural Environmental Resources Soils This section of the DEIS will identify the existing soil type(s) on the subject property based upon the Suffolk County Soil Survey,as published by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS).The potential impacts to soils will be discussed in terms of soil constraints presented in the Suffolk County Soil Survey based upon the proposed land use, structures, sewage disposal, and drainage methods. Mitigation to address soil limitations or constraints,to the extent necessary,will be included. Water Resources This section of the DEIS will describe the groundwater conditions, including depth to groundwater and groundwater quality beneath the subject property, based upon relevant documentation. The Groundwater Management Zone(as classified under Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code)within which the subject property is located and site drainage characteristics will be described. Groundwater flow direction based upon Suffolk County Groundwater Contour Maps will be identified and an assessment of the potential impacts to downgradient resources will be included. The location of private and public wells will also be determined. This section of the DEIS will also include a summary of the findings of due diligence reports (i.e., Phase I/II Environmental Site Assessment[ESA] -see Human Health section of this DEIS. The existing and projected potable water usage for consumption,and for irrigation supply,will be provided. The existing irrigation well will be described and an assessment of the potential for a second irrigation well will be performed. Consultations with the SCWA will be undertaken. This section will also include calculations of projected sanitary flow and consistency with the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. The proposed advanced on- site sewage treatment facility, including the facility design, effluent quality, and system operation, will be discussed. This section will also discuss the location of the proposed advanced on-site sewage treatment facility and conformance with the SCDHS-mandated setback distances. Impacts to water quality, including nearby wells,will be assessed utilizing a BURBS model. The relevant plans and information concerning current potable water use and sanitary generation will also be discussed. The existing stormwater management methods will be described. The projected stormwater volume will be provided and proposed drainage methods will be presented. This section of the DEIS will also include consistency with the Town of Southold requirements and other plans, as they relate to stormwater management. Erosion and sedimentation controls to reduce potential impacts will be also be included and evaluated for consistency with State and Town requirements, including the New York Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control (NYSDEC, 2016) and the New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual(NYSDEC,2015). The potential for flooding will be assessed. Mitigation to reduce impacts to groundwater quantity and quality and surface water quality will be included. Ecological Resources As part of the DEIS,a qualified biologist/ecologist will inspect the site to determine the vegetation,wildlife,and general habitat character._ A tree survey will also be prepared. An inventory of flora and fauna,as observed, will be prepared and included in this section of the DEIS, and an assessment of the species that could be expected to utilize the subject site will be performed. Protected native plants,plant and animals species listed as endangered,threatened,special concern (or with other protective status)will be identified. Consultations with the New York Natural Heritage Program will be undertaken for site information related to habitats,plant and animal species. This section of the DEIS will include the quantitative impacts to habitats as well as a 6 Draft Scope-Draft Environ men pact Statement January 31,2018 The Enclaves-56655 Main Road,Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York qualitative assessment of the impacts to plants and animal species. Mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts will be identified. Human Environmental Resources Land Use.Zoning and Plans This section of the DEIS will generally describe the land uses and zoning within the hamlet area,as well as a detailed description of the uses and zoning on the subject site and in the surrounding area within 500 feet of the subject property. Photographs of the site and surrounding properties,as well as land use and zoning maps, will also be included. A description of the prevailing zoning,including the standards for special exception uses, will be described.Consistency with the requirements set forth in Chapter 280-Article X. Hamlet Business(HB) District and Article VII. Section § 280-35B(4), as it relates to hotel uses, will also be included. The land use character and compatibility of the proposed action with the surrounding area will be evaluated. Land use plans that pertain to the project site and relevant to the proposed land use will be described and will include the Town of Southold Comprehensive Plan:Southold 2020;2005 Town of Southold Hamlet Study;Scenic Southold Corridor Management Plan; and the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP). Consistency analyses with said plans will also be included. A market analysis,as well as tax and job creation analyses, will also be performed and summarized in this section of the DEIS, with supporting documents included within an appendix to the DEIS. Measures to mitigate potential land use and zoning impacts will be provided. Transportation This section of the DEIS will describe the existing traffic conditions and evaluate the effects of the proposed action on the surrounding area roadways and parking. A complete Traffic Impact Study(TIS)will be prepared and appended to the DEIS and summarized in the body of the text. The TIS will include the following tasks: • Observations of existing traffic movements at various times of the day and under different conditions. • Collection and analysis of existing traffic data,including accident and volume data,as available from the NYSDOT, including data from a NYSDOT permanent count station on Route 25 in Southold, and supplemented with data held by the project traffic engineer. • Manual turning movement counts at the intersections of Route 25 at Locust Lane, Route 25 at Town Harbor Lane and Route 25 at the 7-11 driveway opposite the site. These counts will be collected on a typical weekday from 7:00 a.m.to 9:00 a.m.and 4:00 p.m.to 6:00 p.m.,as well as on a typical Saturday between 10:00 a.m.and 12:00 p.m. to reflect the peak hours of the proposed use and peak hours of traffic on the adjacent streets. • Estimates of traffic,based upon the latest edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. • Distribution of the site-generated traffic onto the surrounding street network utilizing background traffic patterns found in the counts performed; accounting for access locations and any turning restrictions expected. • Identification of other planned developments proximate to the subject property through discussions with Town representatives. 7 Draft Scope-Draft Environmena.:: .pact Statement January 31,2018 The Enclaves-56655 Main Road,Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York • Examination of the ability of the street network to accommodate the project-related traffic volume. • Examination of access to and from the site from the standpoint of location and design. The TIS will assess any roadway and traffic control improvements necessary to facilitate the proposed project. • Evaluation of the proposed site plan with regard to traffic circulation, safety, maintenance, and adequacy of layout. • Evaluation of the level of parking provided on-site in relation to requirements set forth in the Town Code. • Comparison of the trip generation estimates for the proposed use with estimates for other As-of-Right use(s) permitted under current zoning. • Capacity analyses will be performed for the above-described intersections for the following conditions: ➢ 2018 Existing Condition ➢ 2020 No-Build Condition(with other approved developments,as applicable) ➢ 2020 Build Condition ➢ 2020 Build Condition with Modifications,as necessary Aesthetic Resources and Community Character This section of the DEIS will describe the existing site and community character. The changes to the aesthetic character of the site, including the proposed architecture, landscaping, outdoor lighting, and signage will included. The changes to existing residence and compatibility of the proposed hotel will be presented. The impacts to community character will be evaluated and will include compatibility of the proposed land use and its operations with the surrounding area. As part of the impacts to aesthetic resources and community character, computer-generated imagery will be prepared to illustrate existing and changes to views from vantage points along Main Road and adjacent land uses. Site lighting standards and requirements, and consistency therewith,will also be included. Measures to mitigate impacts will be identified,as appropriate. Noise and Odor This section of the DEIS will describe the existing noise environment,the effects of the proposed development and any mitigation required to reduce the potential noise impacts. A complete Noise Study will be prepared and appended to the DEIS and summarized in this section of the DEIS. The Noise Study will include an identification of the ambient noise levels at four (4) locations, projected noise impacts and any mitigation required to reduce the potential noise impacts. A 1/3 octave band spectrum analyzer will be used to identify existing ambient levels at the subject property, in both the morning and the evening. At both times, the acoustical consultant will take four (4) readings at four (4) different nearby noise sensitive locations for 20 minutes each with pictures taken at each location at the time of each reading. The acoustical consultant will, to the extent required,utilize a loudspeaker and 1/3 octave band spectrum analyzer to identify any acoustical anomalies which may occur due to additional acoustic reflections off the adjacent buildings. The projected impact of the sound pressure levels as received at the (4) four noise sensitive locations,where ambient data was collected,will be compared to the requirements set forth in the Town noise ordinance(Chapter 180). The Noise Study will also address the potential impacts associated with additional traffic and site activity. Mitigation measures, if determined to be necessary, will be identified. Regarding the potential impacts associated with odor,the potential odor-generating sources will be identified and mitigation to reduce impacts, to the extent required,will be included. 8 Draft Scope-Draft Environmen._: ..:.pact Statemen t — January31,2018 The Enclaves-56655 Main Road,Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York Historic and Archaeological Resources This section of the DEIS will identify the potential historic and archaeological resources based upon published resources of the New York State Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation(OPRHP) and the Town. The Part 3 Attachment/Positive Declaration identifies the potential for archaeological impacts due to the site's location within a State designated archaeologically-sensitive area. However,subsequent to the preparation of the Part 3 Attachment/Positive Declaration (issued November 16, 2017) and prior to the preparation of this Draft Scope,the Town of Southold consultants undertook consultations with OPRHP. In correspondence dated December 28, 2018, OPRHP indicated: "We have no archeological concerns or architectural concerns with the proposed new construction.As such, we have no further comments regarding the new building's construction." OPRHP has provided comments regarding the proposed rehabilitation of the historic house. This section of the DEIS will summarize this correspondence and all subsequent comments and determinations of OPRHP based upon consultations that will be undertaken. Mitigation to reduce impacts will be included. Human Health As part of the DEIS, a Phase I/II ESA will be performed and included within an appendix. This section of the DEIS will include a summary of the existing conditions, as it relates to recognized environmental conditions (RECs)and/or potential environmental concerns(PECs),as determined from a Phase I ESA. Soil sampling will be performed for the potential presence of soil contaminants related to past agricultural practices,and would include samples obtained at a density of one sample per two acres.Samples will be obtained from the upper soil layer of 0"-6"and a deeper sample from 18"-24"below surface grade.If required,a soil management plan will be prepared. If necessary and based upon the ESAs, groundwater sampling will also be performed. The methodology, results and mitigation/remediation (if required) will be summarized. The presence of any subsurface structures (oil tanks,sanitary systems) will also be investigated.This section of the DEIS will also summarize the demolition and construction schedule and the associated potential impacts will be evaluated as it relates to potential human health hazards. A description of mitigation measures proposed to address and minimize the potential demolition and construction impacts also will be included in this section of the DEIS. Other Required Sections - Use and Conservation of Energy This section of the DEIS will include a brief discussion on those aspects of the proposed action that will contribute to an increase in energy as well as potential options for conservation. Adverse Impacts That Cannot Be Avoided(Short-Term and Long-Terml This section of the DEIS will include a brief listing of those adverse environmental impacts described/discussed previously that are anticipated to occur,but which cannot be completely mitigated. Irretrievable and Irreversible Commitment of Resources This section of the DEIS will include a brief discussion of those natural and human resources that will be committed to and/or consumed by the proposed project. Growth-Inducing Impacts This section of the DEIS will include a brief discussion of those aspects of the proposed project that will or may trigger or contribute to future growth in the area. 9 Draft Scope-Draft Environment ....pact Statement — January 31,2018 The Enclaves-56655 Main Road,Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York Extent and Quality of Information Needed to Adequately Address Potentially Significant Adverse Impacts In order to conduct the analyses of potential adverse impacts, available information will be collected and reviewed, and empirical information will be developed. While it is not possible to determine all information sources to be used, the following represent sources/research that have been preliminarily identified as necessary to perform the required analyses in the DEIS. Soils • Suffolk County Soil Survey • Soil borings,as available Water Resources • United States Geological Survey(USGS) water table map and monitoring well data,as available • Suffolk County Groundwater Contour Maps • Phase I/II ESA • Relevant plans, standards and regulations, such as The Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan, The Long Island Comprehensive Special Groundwater Protection Area Plan,Suffolk County Water Resources Management Plan(2011 and reissued in 2014),Suffolk County Sanitary Code, New York Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control, New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual,and Reducing the Impacts of Stormwater Runoff from New Development • Chapter 236 of the Town of Southold Code(Stormwater Management) • BURBS model,as develop at Cornell University by Hughes et al. • NYSDEC Freshwater and Tidal Wetland maps • U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service-National Wetlands Inventory • Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map • Consultations with SCWA Ecological Resources • Correspondence with the New York Natural Heritage Program and site file information regarding habitats,plant and animal species • Observation data from field investigations • Published material regarding the presence of protected native plants,plant and animal species listed as endangered, threatened, special concern (or with other protective status) and significant habitat areas on or in the vicinity of the project site • Ecological Communities Map • Tree Survey Land Use.Zoning and Plans • Available and relevant zoning codes and maps and comprehensive plans (Town of Southold Zoning Code,Town of Southold Comprehensive Plan:Southold 2020,2005 Town of Southold HamletStudy,Scenic Southold Corridor Management Plan and Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program) • Site and area inspections 10 Draft Scope-Draft Environment-.....pact Statement January 31,2018 The Enclaves-56655 Main Road,Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York Transportation vw� v • Traffic counts • Most-recent three-year accident data • ITE's publication entitled Trip Generation,latest edition • Highway Capacity Manual,latest edition • Consultations with and input from the NYSDOT and Town of Southold Aesthetics and Community Character • Architectural plans and elevations • Computer-generated imagery • Site and area inspections • Chapter 172 of the Town of Southold Code(Lighting,Outdoor) • Findings of the Noise Study and TIS Noise and Odor • Noise measurements utilizing 1/3 octave band spectrum analyzer at the subject property and surrounding properties • Town of Southold noise ordinance(Chapter 180) • Industry standards for odor mitigation Historic and Archaeological Resources • Consultations with OPRHP • Available information regarding historic resources,including the OPRHP Cultural Resource Information System and Town documents Human Health • Phase I/II Environmental Site Assessment • Sampling results • Reports regarding subsurface conditions and demolition activities • Relevant NYSDEC,USEPA and Town documents related to the subject property • Construction schedule Initial Identification of Mitigation Measures As the DEIS analyses have not yet been conducted,no specific mitigation measures have yet been developed. Nonetheless, where the impact analyses conducted in the DEIS indicate the potential for significant adverse impacts,the DEIS will set forth measures to mitigate those impacts within the topic sections, as presented in the Proposed DEIS Outline earlier in this Draft Scope. 11 Draft Scope-DraftEnvironmene-�= .�pactStatement January 31,2018 The Enclaves-S665S Main Road, Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York A. l Reasonable Alternatives to Be Considered lVV/ Pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617,the DEIS must contain a description and evaluation of reasonable alternatives to the proposed action that are feasible,considering the objectives and capabilities of the project sponsor. This DEIS will analyze the impacts of the following alternatives and compare(quantitatively and qualitatively)these impacts to those associated with implementation of the proposed action, based upon the specific issues outlined above: • No-Action(site remains as it currently exists) • Development Pursuant to Prevailing Zoning(Permitted Use) 12 E� 6655 Main Street , LLC , #7046 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION OF THE ENCLAVES HOTEL & RESTAURANT S, ',.TM No . 1000 -63 -3 - 15 Proposed construction of a 44 Unit, Two Story Hotel and a detached 74 Seat Restaurant upon a 6 . 75 acre parcel in the Hamlet Business Zoning District THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 7 , 2019 at 5 : 00 PM If you are interested in this project, you may review the file(s) prior to the hearing during normal business days between 8 AM and 3 PM. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLll (631) 765-1809 'TOWN OF SOUTHOLD rI0 4(o S ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK (1� G?)o a- AFFIDAVIT S'(0(0J S I\kA,1 A OF In the Matter of the Application of: MAILINGS 56655 Main Rd. LLC (The Enclaves) (Name of Applicant/Owner) 56655 Main Road (NYS Rte 25) , Southold, NY SCTM No. 1000- 63-3-15 (Address of Property) (Section, Block&Lot) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK I, ( ) Owner, ( X ) Agent Charles R. Cuddy residing at Marratooka Lane mar-tit-lick, NY New York, being duly sworn, deposes and says that: On the 18 day of October 20 19, I personally mailed at the United States Post Office in Riverhead ,New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in Prepaid envelopes addressed to current property owners shown on the current assessment roll Verified from the official records on file with the (X ) Assessors, or ( ) County Real Property Office, for every property which abuts and is across a public or private street, or vehicular right-of-way of record, surrounding the applicant's property. ignatu're) Sworn to before me this ,�Z75 day of Odober , 20 MI tWONA KODYM Notary Public, State of New York kw 4�0p Na. 01 KO6088386 Qualified in Suffolk County (Notary Public) Commission Expires March 3, 2027 PLEASE list on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. All original USPS receipts and mailing confirmations to be submitted to the ZBA Office along with this form completed, signed and notarized. o i 0 0 0 Er s 19-5 �� i L U S 0901 CO Postage $ $2.80 08 LnII.0 Certified Fee $(J.[II_I —_ `� $I_I.i 0 � , _Zfosfmark i M 1 Return Receipt Fee 1 I(ly/ Here (Endorsement Required) O _ C3 Restricted DeliveryF Cb j L:3 (Endorsement Reul cc `Q—N3 ' ! `total Postage&Fejb tpt II181• 619 �- Sent To ' 0 56600 Main LLC Street,Apt.No.; rLj C3orPo6oXNcQO Box 389 City,State,ziP+a._m-------------------------- ---------------------------- tti Cutchogue NY 119 3-- ® o A. Si na e I ■ Complete items'1,2,and 3. „9e��j, I ■ Print your name and address on the reverse °p Addressee-;i i so that we can return the card to you. -, 11 .118.,7 ceived by tinted Name) Date of Daffy, I ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, J r or on the front if spacepermits. 111 1. Article Addressed to: '' ' D Is delapery address differe t from i}em j \D Yes I YES,enter delivery address belo I Witzke Capital LLC / \\ PO BOX 937 Southold, NY 11971 I I i f i 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mad Express@ i ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MadTM I IIIIII IIII 111111111 IIII I1 Iill I III I I III i I III ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mad Restricted ❑Certified Mail@ Delivery 9590 9402 4044 8079 3397 17 13Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation"' 2. Article_Number_(Transfer from service label) M,_,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;,,, ❑Signature Confirmation i 7 018 3090 0000 4591 1363 tr,led Delivery Restricted Delivery PS,Form 38j, 1, 2015 PSN 75k0 02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt I s • o • • • • ■ Complete Items 1,9,and 3. rlsdelivery ■ Print your'name and address on the reverse Agent l so that we can return the card to you. Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, by(Printed Name) C. Date of Deliveryor on the front if space permits. VS'6N1. Article Addressed to: address different from item 17 D Yes nter delivery address below: D No Eugen•,Tomasic Mirella Tomasic 876 Willis Ave. , Ste 2 _ Albertson, NY 115073. (1b `9 � '• 1 (61 II I IIIIII illi Ili I III Ili III IIIIIIII��i I II I i ❑Adult sign Signature Restricted Delivery ❑ce Type VC I Priority ered a Mail pM@ ❑Reglyt�re a I-Restricted? ❑Certified Mail@ eve dmf 9590 9402 4658 8323 9952 08 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑1714t—jm'Recelpt for El Collect on Delivery Merchandise ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfinnationTm ` 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label l ❑Signature Confirmation 4591 1400 I Restri6te&Delivery Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7536-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt 0 Q CHARLES R.CUDDY 100�bel ATTORNEY AT LAW 445 GRIFFING AVENUE RIVERHEAD,NEW YORK Mailing Address: TEL: (631)369-8200 PO Box 1547 FAX. (631)369-9080 Riverhead,NY 11901 E-mail: charlescuddy@optonline.net � October 23, 2019 Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Attn: Kim Fuentes Re: The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant SCTM#1000-63-3-15 Dear Ms. Fuentes: We are enclosing an Affidavit of Mailing in connection with a hearing scheduled for November 7, 2019, along with green/white receipts and the green signature cards. Please make it part of your file. Very truly yours, (�44L e Charles R. Cuddy CRC:ik Enclosures 56655 Main Rd. LLC -The Enclaves SCTM#1000-63-3-15 1. SCTM#1000-63-3-3 Long Island Railroad Co. Jamaica Station Jamaica,NY 11435 2. SCTM#1000-63-3-1.1 1070 Boisseau Ave LLC 2412 National Dr. Brooklyn,New York 11234 3. SCTM#1000-63-3-28.1 Witzke Capital LLC PO Box 937 Southold,New York 11971 4. SCTM#1000-63-3-12 NKK LLC 30 Hampton Road Southampton,New York 11968 5. SCTM#1000-63-3-13 Jorge Torrento Sonia Torrento 56365 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 6. SCTM#1000-63-3-14 Eugen Tomasic 876 Willis Avenue, Ste. 2 Albertson,New York 11507 7. SCTM#1000-63-3-16 Lauren E. Barry 56755 Route 25 Southold,NY 11971 U.S.Postal Service ■ • vCERTIFIED MAIL ° ■ i (DomesticOnly; i 0 e • e wru -DALLAS�TX 752, r 1 `1M, Sir? � i 1 i Er - ra ", ,11 I Er Certified Mad Fee $3.50 jiff X71 CO Postage $ $�.gi_I �`. i19[110 IJ') $ V II - ���� _£ � - 08 .� -moo 'rlu �"' Extra SeNtCOS&Fees(checkbox,add fee aeFP�rggnate)Lr) t, $11•Ill l � t1� ❑Retum Receipt(hardcopy) $ ``,„,,, f Certified Fee d ~ I ', O Retum Recel t electronic $ 11•I_ I Pos ' V --�C ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ '�'i I I-it I I :' � 1 Return Receipt Fee $i1•[ifl Re � � Postmar rn 0 C , M (Endorsement Required) �� Here p []Adult Required $ I I•�Ifl ^ q n Q �,: [:]Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ 0 Restricted Delivery Fee ` Postage © rt (EndorsementRequi$@ ee $f1.5P1 O Total Postage&Fees pTc 11/1�/7��1 C7 117 m Total Postage and FSs 85 1 i7/1 U/-2019 Sent To $ a° c0 Sent To o Southland Corp,__Attu;_-Ad-Valorem Tax rq Eugen and Mirella_Tomasic_____________________________ • - - '---""-''- -----•------------- `� Street andA t No,or P�Box No. Street,Apt No,; - -" Q P oor Poeo�yBox 711 _87_ ---�Ii.1 i.a__AVPnua,,__ate__2-------- -------- I• Ciry,�t to,zIP+ O Clty,State,ZIP+4 ASU ertson NY � 11507 Dallas TX 75221-9867 1 11 1 ••1 -- 'CERTIFIEDi MAIL" RECEIPT . � n- m , M 'I-• .• 1 E. Certified Mad Fee $3,50 119fi1 1 Certified Mad Fee ell l g(1 Ln $ i�L Q EMra Services&Fees(checkbox,add lee ffpr to)• i:'`'-' - �- Extra Servlces&Fees(checkbox,edd fee lepp oA4ato) ❑ Return Receipt(haMcopy) $ r" tr - ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ •' °� EZI ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ l 1•_O.- zpostmark I] ❑Retum Receipt(electronic) $ iI i vk+ hPostme k O ❑ $Il.11ll_�; " it ut�,;l CO Here G Certified Mlul Restricted Delivery $, Here -LL O ❑Certfied Mail Restricted Delivery $ -,.y-r.� ;,� t i Q ❑Adult Signature Required $ d f- r4lf Ir ' a`-` C3 []Adult Signature Required $— E]Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ 1'�` 'rrf�_ []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ Postage c �p.� G d ti, C7 Postage 55 iia er'Y,J �4 '`�. �il I..�.a Er $ 1�)' 0/1�8/2019' Q" $ 0 Total Postage and s C3 Total Postage and Fees M $ x%5.8•_ m $ $6.85 coSenr r� JorgTo e_and Sonia_Torrento , __'_____ Bial Altintol5ra-- Street andApt.No.,of PO BoxNoSteetadAptONopO VorB �`- __5b3_h5__Maiz>_Road-------------------------------------=--------- -- r-' PQ__B_QX-_1b9-Q------------------------------------------------------ - c, slate, IP+4® G%Slate tP+ ® NY 11971 joutiold, NY 11971 rySou#�fio�d, :11 1 I I 111 I :11 1 11 111•1 . tU ■ • ■ • ■ , ° . ■ ■ ® © . ■ M /• Oni 1 rrl My r-:, 4T7, - 6 ,�i V 0901 p^ Certified Mail Fee $3.5tt73 hll 0301r=1 Ul I 1)Agri Er Certdted Mail Fee "`� ci I Extra Services&Fees(cheekbox,add feegsgpp�ppata) i Ln $ 11 101WO ❑ Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ ll°-�`JJ .' - Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add fee,�s�ppn7edate) _ •u.-.�� 0 ❑Return Recelpt(electronic) - $ �I e_ 1 +'� Np ark. ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ i>' V lr C3 y p �I.1.111 �. ` O ,❑Certified,Mall Restricted Delivery $ gtl� I�(� Oere O ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ �'' Ostmark'w''� []Adult Signature Required $ $0 i 11 ,' Cb 6 0 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery.$ []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ I•r - ,� � ❑Adult Signature Required $ �i[)•yfl A C. []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ Postage �$0.'}5 t� �V �C p Postage $0.55 { J • _ OTotal Postage and Fees f '1 1!1 ��111 g Er $ "101/1 8/yo,9 " M $6.85 O Total Postage andcc s $ m ��.O8c Sen(To $ r-, Witzke Capital_ 'LLC 43 Sent To , ------------- ------ =- = = = - - ra NKK LLC � Street andAptt.No.,orP013ozA(o. - ____________________-___________ BD__RoX-931_ = O Street andApt.No.,or PO Box IVo. Carystate IP+ ® - -------------------------------- --- ---------------- Sout'hold, NY 11971 3A__Hanx�xi__8oad_________________________ c��bou'tlampton, NY 11968' i :e l 1 111•a _ I 8. SCTM#1000-63-3-17.2 / Emily Barbera Dorothy Geraci 738 Ascon Rd. Franklin Square,NY 11010 9. SCTM#1000-63-3-17.4 Bilal Altintoprak PO Box 1690 Southold,New York 11971 10. SCTM#1000-63-3-17.3 Anthony Forgione PO Box 1118 Southold,New York 11971 11. SCTM#1000-63-3-24 Joseph F. Krukowski Marilyn Krukowski 59475 Rte. 25 Southold,NY 11971 12. SCTM#1000-62-3-37 Southland Corp. Attn. Ad Valorem Tax PO Box 711 Dallas, TX 75221-9867 13. SCTM#1000-62-3-38 56600 Main LLC PO Box 389 Cutchogue,New York 11935 ■ I MEMO" rl_{rq n m s I -r • e o o •,•a Certified Mail FeeCertfied Mad Fee 50 (19 1 Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee a ao te) - -.C1� $ �R a ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ $il 1. II_ - - '� Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add fee gproAf✓dte O ,!` ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ $11 t111 ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ L' lll Postmark; (� 1_I e. { Postmark OO []Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ ,o- ;— Here � , 0 ❑Returp Receipt(electronic), $ HB ' 6r ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ d{7 � i ❑AdultSignature Required $ �,t Q�"IIIp I � []Adult Signature Required $ Qt— f ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ Vi e" (T C3 J , f f []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ •d' . i C3 Postage t trs• %1 1/ ra 11.cc �. 190' p Postage $11.55 s, r Total Postage and Fees 1 a 1I18{2011 g o 'S%?C{14 fl l �.e� 4 I: [T I Total Postage and Fffii $ ----------------,----- r�� Emil Barbera Doroth Geraci �t7 Sent To Y M r� ------------- i.on Zs1an d_Rai 1 rQ2L1_L1�_e.._____.____ O StreetandApt.No.,orPtSB---w(- O Street a d Apt.No or P�Box No. Emily Jamaica Station _ c)--;-s�ie:zi----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 r'' 38__9s�con-_Brad-----------------= =- =-------- ------------------ )ty,State, 1 +4, NY 11010 Franklin Square, :10 1 r 1 rrl'1. - r I r r11•1• :ao - rVice ®• I 11- �• IT.{ a o • -m s _r • ° _r' SR L s • 4 �1Y5QU L m 1! 1 • e .. . Certified Mail Fee $ 'i lgfi ,.e� � M � ru '? a ¢ $ Extra Services&Fees(heckbox,add fee at,a�vrygrlate) Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee W.~elate) • ' �, E-3 ❑ Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ 7} tt�tll�t f OCT p grip(t ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ •�•• S k'^"'"`•"®"• •' ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ 14 C I t."L apt 3 � ❑Return Receipt(electronic) , $ �1�a 1�{� ��� Postmark 0 ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ t �{�..[1[I Here 1/j d ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ $0 00 HZ% ' C3 ❑Adult Signature Required $ $0.00 Q r= []Adult Signature Required $ $0f'r A��; E]Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ 17 Postagemec yrlJ� p Postage $0.55' {�- $ 10/18/2019 Ir $ Total Postage and Ffa C3 Total Postage and Fegs a rtj6.85 Mbb ep Sent To ra S�nb�O Boisseau Ave__LLC--------------------------------------- r-a Lauren''E,e Barr --------------------= -- --------- -- $Veef and A t.No.,or P6Boz�(o. o�PO Boz No. P � � Street andApGNo., " ' _2.4_].2._Na,�Iaxial_.Ur------------------------------------------------- 1` 3b755__Rte-•---25------------------------------=----- ----------'-- CRy te;ZIP-4 Crty ate,ZIP+4® Brookl n, NY 11234 sSouthold, NY 11971 ___ :eo —_�__—_rr_rr•>' _- __�_--- I :ra r ,e rre•a 1 J 43rq Im � � e 501 �L1� 1 50U�pl{ JU PIS E t� Q- Certified Mad Feed e- �, p— Certified Mad Fee $3.50 0901 U $,3.50 �7g01 Ln $ '7 ail 08 �- $ '�l �- fl$ Extra Services&Fees checkbox,add fee p ate -T..9•- .! Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add fee t te) , ( • ) y,'� r ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ r`- ad LL5 O ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ O { t{{{ !>' ❑Return Receipt(electronlo) $ C`7 'Y-+i ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ r P'ostmarkr, O q Pdsttnark C3 [I Certified Mail Restricted Delivery •$ r{J l.{�I '�� `J ^y 1:1 Certified Mall Restricted Delivery, $ $0 -00 �• fj0re� O tri I �/ `�, bSJ d ❑Adult Signature Required $_, hr.�f{�_�_ ®p 0 F1 Adult Signature Required $ y.,_,{ )d j }y ,� e []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery p_Postage a O-Postage .55 Er $' 141 v X201`19, m Total Postage and Fes 1-111/1 a8f''2�19 Total Postage and Fees ;� ✓ $ ." c0 Se To ca Sent To rq nthony Forgione t� Joseph & Marilyn Krukowski C3 §tieetandApt IVa:-o�POBazNd.------------`--------------------------------------- O streetSr�l4pr.�vo, rtP�eox M1 0 ox r 1118 City, te,ZIP+4® r Cdj State; ---,F-j® - '9outhold, NY 11971 outhold, NY 11971 - " :oo a or arr•r '11 r a, er,•e V �t� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS �0 S& SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK l% e, -)C.L-"es AFFIDAVIT �b 5� M4,('C4 OF LLC In the Matter of the Application of: POSTING 56655 Main Rd. LLC (The Enclaves) SCTM No. 1000- 63-3-L5 (Name of Applicants) (Section, Block& Lot) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK I I I Charles R. Cuddy residing at Marratooka Lane, Mattituck, ,New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: I am the ( ) Owner or ( x) Agent for owner of the subject property j On the 21 day of October , 2019 , I personally placed the Town's Official Poster on subject property located at: 56655 Main Road (NYS Rte 25) , Southold, NY I indicating the date of hearing and nature of application noted thereon, securely upon subject property, - located ten (10) feet or closer from the street or right-of-Way (driveway entrance) facing the street or facing each street or right-of-way entrance,* and that; I hereby confirm firm that the Poster has remained in place for seven (7)days prior to the date of the subject hearing date, which hearing date was shown to be November 7, 2019. (Owner Agent 1gnat re) �k Sworn to before me this Day of (O,k6e - , 20 IcA IWONA KODYM / Notary Public, State of New York (� Na. 01 K06088386 Oualified in Suffolk County (Notary Public) Commission Expires March 3, 202-15 * near the entrance or driveway entrance of property, as the area most visible to passerby SECTION ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Sig ure ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X A& Agent so that we can return the card to you. Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. ceiv y(Fri ed Nam iDate of Delivery or on the front if space permits. ,i ('� vz!�) J 1. Article Addressed to: Ef Is delivery addiess different from item 1? ❑Yes jj Southland Carp-.-- If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No Attn:-Ad' Valorem Tax t j PO Box 711 Dallas, -TX 75221-9867 II I Illlll Illi 111111 li i illi I I Ill Il VIII I I I II 111 3. ServiceType ❑RegiPriority Mail Express® ❑Adult Signature 13-Registered Mad*^" ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted M Certified Mail® Delivery / 9590 9402 4044 8079 3789 69 ❑Certified Mad RestrictedDehvery ❑Return Receipt for i ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article Number_(/"ransfer from service label) , ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTm _ ---a=->i �_s 1 _s_ _!1 i_ ❑Insur'ed Mad' =1 i ;t" l t t j❑ySlgnatureConfirmation _ x 71102 0 4 6 0 0003 19 5 8 4982 ill Restricted Deh4e'ryt "t Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811:,July 2035 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 i '_Domestic Return-Receipt SEN • • ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signature j ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X / ❑Agent so that we can return the card to you. 2�V ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Received by tinted Name) C. Date of De very or on the front if space permits. " 1 D" 1. Article Addressed to: D. a ss different from item 1? ❑Yes Jorge TOYrento I deli ry address below: ❑No Sdnid-,�Torrento 56365 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 �� JJ 3. Seryl ❑Priority Mail ExpriissO­ 13 Adult t! - ' Il l Illlll Illi 111 l Ill Ill 111 l llllllll lull 111 111 ❑Adult SiSignature Signature Restricted Delivery 1:1 Registered Mail Restricted' 9590 9402 4658 8323 9952 53 11 Certified Mall® Delivery =:} ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ; 0C ollect on Delivery Merchandise ' --.1 --6—frrancfarfrom s0rvic6 label) ❑-Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationT^+ f 7 018 3090 0 0 0 0 n_m�,,.ad Mall 11Signature,Confirmation t 4 5 91 13 9 4 ail Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt • • 1 • . e • N DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signatur ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X VAgent so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Rece" d by pin&d Name) C. Date of Delivery ! or on the front if space permits. 60•Z;_ Iq 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes Emily Barbera If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No Dorothy Geraci 738j,',Asc6n• Road ' FranilinrSqua-re_ NY 11010 Il l Illlll Illi lIl 111 ll l Illi I l Illi I lI lI it l i II 111 Signature e 0 Priority Mail❑Adult Signature Restrirv,ce Tycted Delivery El Registered Mail ❑AdultRestricted 13Registered MailTM 9590 9402 4044 8079 3396 87 O Certified Mad® Delivery � o ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article Number(transfer from service label) _ Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery 13 Signature Confirmation`r' ` — t ' i ' `[;l" El Signature Confirmation `f 7 018 3 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 4 59' 1` 14 2 4 I Restricted Delivery,`'., Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811,July 2016 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt'-' CHARLES R.CUDDY ATTORNEY AT LAW 445 GRIFFING AVENUE RIVERHEAD,NEW YORK Mailing Address: TEL- (631)369-8200 P.O.Box 1547 FAX: (631)369-9080 Riverhead,NY 11901 E-mail: charlescuddy@optonline.net October 31, 2019 Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Attn: Kim Fuentes Re: The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant SCTM#1000-63-3-15 Dear Ms. Fuentes: With reference to the above matter,enclosed please find an Affidavit of Posting.Also,enclosed are additional green signature cards. Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy CRC:ik Enclosures ■ Complete iteh s-l...,2,and 3. A S� atur ■ Print your namd ail'd address on the reverse X ❑ ent so that we can return the card to-you Addressee ■ Attach this card to the backp,tf a mail iec B. eceiv by(Printe C. Date of Delivery or on the front if space per)nits� qS 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No Anthony Forgione PO Box 1118 cameo e,® Southold, NY 1197 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mad Express® II I IIIIII IIII III I II II I IIII 11111 I Il III IIII III ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered Mail ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery El Registered Mad Restricted ❑Certified Mad® Delivery 9590 9402 4044 8079 3396 63 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise ransfer from service label ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTM 2. Article Number (T --- ) rl lacurad Mad ❑Signature Confirmation Iricted Delivery Restricted Delivery 7 018 3090 0000 4591 14 4 8 j PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt e COMPLETE •N COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A Signature ■.Print your name and address on the reverse X % .•Agent so that we can return the card to you. �/ !t / ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B.I49ceived by(Printed Name) C Da of D livery i or on the front if space permits. ® �3 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? IE Ye Bilal Altintoprak If YES,enter delivery address below: El No i , PO Box 1690 j Southold, NY 11971 ! I ' I 1 - IIII Illi III I II I I II I I I I i I II II I II I III Service Type ❑Priority Mail Expresso 11 ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MaiITM ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mad Restricted ❑Certified Mad® Delivery 9590 9402 4044 8079 3396 70 [1 Certified Mad Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑'Signature ConfirmationTM _ ____ _ _ _ I n 1—--1 ne.i ❑Signature Confirmation 7 018 3090 ❑000 4591 14 31 ricted Delivery Restricted Delivery , PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt ; CO6M COMPLETEo ON ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signature I ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X/ [3Agent so that we can return the card to you. ISCAddressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, ff Rpiceivl5cl by(Printed Name) C. Date f Deli ery or on the front if space permits. e'- e C`2 al o&'15 r 10 �' O 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? El Yes Jospeh F. Krukowski If YES,enter delivery address below: [3No Marilyn Krukowski 59475 Rte. 25 Southold, NY 11971 L13.111111 IIII III I II II IIII I I IIII I II II III I II III Service Type ElPriority Mall Expresso ❑Adult Signature EJ Registered MaiITM ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mad Restricted ❑Certified Mao Delivery 9590 9402 4044 8079 3396 56 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTM 11Insured Mail ❑Signature Confirmation 7 018 3090 0000 4591- 1264 ?estricted Delivery Restricted Delivery I PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530=02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt i L ' BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ®�� r�®� 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 ® Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. " _ ' �� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento COU Southold,NY 11971 9 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631) 765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, OCTOBER 14, 2021 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Town Code Chapter 280 (Zoning),Town of Southold,the following public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS at the TOWN HALL MEETING ROOM, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971-0959, on THURSDAY, OCTOBER 14, 2021. IF YOU INTEND TO APPEAR IN PERSON, YOU MUST WEAR A MASK. The public may ALSO have access to view, listen and make comment during the PUBLIC HEARING as it is happening via ZOOM WEBINAR. Details about how to tune in and make comments during the PUBLIC HEARING are on the Town's website agenda for this meeting which may be viewed at http://southoldtownnv.gov/aaendacenter. Additionally, there will be a link to the Zoom Webinar meeting at http://southoldtownnv.gov/calendar.aspx. 5:00 P.M. — Request for Special Exception of The Enclaves Hotel and Restauran #704 - The project is 6.75 acres and is located on the north side of Main Road +/-90 feet west f the intersection of Main Road and Town Harbor Lane. The property address is 56655 Nrain Road, Southold. Plans include the conversion of an existing two-story home into a 74-seat restaurant and construction of a 44-unit hotel, including four detached cottages upon a parcel located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, NY, particularly known as Suffolk County Tax Map No. 1000-63-3-15. A copy of the Final Environmental Impact Statement is available for public review at the town's website (httgs://www.southoldtownny.gov/) or can be directly accessed from the Town's Weblink/Laserfiche file at http•//southoldtownny.gov/1298/Environmental-Impact-Statement. A hardcopy can be reviewed Monday through Friday between 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM at the Office of the Town Clerk at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, at the Zoning Board of Appeals Office, Town Hall Annex Building, 54375 Route 25, Southold, or at the Southold Free Library, Main Road, Southold. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons or their representatives,desiring to be heard at each hearing,and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review on The Town's Weblink/Laserfiche under Zoning Board of Appeals(ZBA)\Board Actions\Pending. Click Link: http•//24 38 28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0. If you have questions, please telephone our office at(631)765-1809,or by email:kimf@southoldtownny.gov. - Dated: September 16, 2021 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LESLIE KANES WEISMAN, CHAIRPERSON By: Kim E. Fuentes 54375 Main Road (Office Location) 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 (Mailing/USPS) Southold, NY 11971-0959 G� Town Hall Annex, 54375 NYS Route 25 A P.O.Box 1179 CL Southold,New York 11971.0959 ®' _ I Fax(631) 765-9064 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DATE: September 16, 2021 RE: INSTRUCTIONS FOR PUBLIC HEARING Dear Applicant; Pursuant to the New York State Governor's announcement lifting many COVID-19 restrictions, the Town will now resume IN-PERSON meetings that are open to the public. For those who wish to attend the meeting virtually, for health and safety reasons, we will continue via Zoom Webinar, as well. Therefore,the October 14, 2021 (a, 5:00 PM Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting for THE ENCLAVES HOTEL AND RESTAURANT will be held BOTH in person in the Town Hall Meeting Room at 53095 Main Road, Southold AND via video conferencing(Zoom Webinar), and a transcript will be provided at a later date. The public will have an opportunity to see and hear the meeting live, and make comments. Below, please see instructions required to prepare for the ZBA public hearing which includes: PLEASE READ CAREFULLY. 1. Yellow sign to post on your property a minimum of seven(7) days prior to your hearing,to be placed not more than 10 feet from the front property line (within your property) bordering the street. If you border more than one street or roadway, an extra sign is supplied for posting on both street frontages. Posting should be done no later than October 6, 2021. To avoid weather damage to your sign please affix it to a sturdy surface such as plywood. If your sign is damaged please call the office and we will provide you with another one. Prior to your public hearing, members of the Board of Appeals will each conduct a personal inspection of Your property. If a Board member reports that there is no signage visibly on display as required by law,your scheduled hearing will be adjourned to a later date to ensure compliance with Chapter 55-1 (B) 1 of the Town Code. 2. SC Tax Map with property numbers. 3. Legal Notice of in person meeting,as well as video conferencing. Instructions for participation will follow, and will be posted on the Town's Website under the meeting date, and the Legal Notice section of Suffolk Times Newspaper. 4. Affidavits of Mailings and Posting to be completed by you, notarized, and returned to our office by October 4,2021,verifying that you have properly mailed and posted. Please attach a photograph of the posting on your property with your affidavit of posting. 5. Instructions for Laserfiche/Weblink to view application. Instructions for ZBA Public Hearing Page 2 MAILING INSTRUCTIONS: Please send by USPS Certified Mail Return Receilpi the following documents to all owners of property (tax map with property numbers enclosed)vacant or improved, which abuts and any property which is across from any public or private street. We ask that you send your mailings promptly so that if any piece is undeliverable, you can reach out to your neighbors to request their mailing addresses, and re-mail. Mailing to be done by September 27,2021. a. Legal Notice informing interested parties of meeting being conducted IN PERSON and via video conferencing. (Enclosed) A WEBLINK to the meeting will be provided on the Town's Website under the date of the meeting. b. Your Cover Letter which should include your contact information, date and time of hearing, procedures for submitting written comment via email or USPS to our office. Recipients should be able to contact you for additional information. Furthermore, if recipients need to contact the ZBA staff,they may telephone 631-765-1809 or email us at kimf@southoldtownny.gov or elizabeth.sakarellos(Ltown.southold.ny.us c. Instructions for Laserfiche/Weblink to view all pending applications. (Enclosed) Link to view pending applications: http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblinkBrowse.aspx?dbid=0. d. Survey or Site Plan depicting"as-built"and proposed improvements requiring ZBA relief. The Town's Laserfiche/Weblink files provides both location addresses and mailing addresses in their current Assessment Roll listing. (See Link Below). Also,the Town Assessor's Office can be reached at 631-765-1937. Contact us via email or by phone if you need further assistance. TownOfSouthold>Assessors>Assessment Books/Tax Rolls>2010-2019>2019 http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/O/doc/1022250/Pa el.aspx. IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS: Scan and email the USPS mailing receipts, green signature cards and affidavits to kimf(dc_southoldtownny.gov, and ** PROMPTLY USPS MAIL** the ORIGINALS to the Town of Southold, ZBA, P.O. Box 1179, Southold, NY 1197L Please note that without your mailing receipts, the ZBA will be prevented from conducting your hearing,pursuant to Chapter SS of the Southold Town Code and New York State Law. Please note that you or your representative are required to attend. If you or your representative are not present, the hearing will be adjourned to the next available hearing date. Please be reminded that New York State Law requires the ZBA to follow the above specific policies. If for any reason,you are unable to prepare for your public hearing as instructed, please let us know. Kim E. Fuentes Board Assistant • 7g � �„`fsv# 4� i"fl` e�k�. ', v'#ir{y .>!' '''T �"tiN`'9''.rY' T� a'>�` �r �„ V'j '9' '2a.^'I+`'2M '`.,}.rJa:t S..✓. ..VtE..�`F" f ,t� i ,. uh ,y�x. t a$ f ft y r S a T • .,.'a ` .'�..'R- �- E i r��3,wr=sem j r..ns!�:. 3. � .j' - ..�:,. �i".�YS St*-,�.t1. t- f,�6;,.}�sr�6 i,'� ,- "C�i.,irl ffill 3't! 'f� Tas r-'iz.`c �• <tcF� �"� IK S,K,;• r 1.� r^� F � b �s Y s,'t' t� �'„y,j' �'^"��'uSs. "d 9< IN, .�t'� �4�f��s+n ;. �:�;tt �"'"j� ,. .ri.'= ,'�<.' t',�y_ d 54„ ar s• Y'• '�° +�wr "e .nr' �-�,$ 'TDTQlia� +':� � ..,4z"3�[ "t+f ?;*i<�. f., �3,'FY"�$ cr ,1„*cc�v <'i I� $��i�F. t 1p. �rf1.^y.rt Ate+ "r3��g �'�G5Jr m ' �:at sr VIM rYI.` 4f k'L '• << z �� 5.� ��? +rl��tt<� {��� t"oR y` F�.' fvl_'vi..T'�1- "Y.F �1 ^ Alwcfis 4 11,1 0, AN c deMa- AM" .7 5 ,� 'tf'4^S�' # 3 •.+ h '� ty�� � '",3 .�TM L i >K 5 � ;e �E Af 4 4 'i.- rakx3ha sF �t l;14. rz i*t' 1 . t� z `f' ' 4'r Vii+.. ,r-s4'ai i•4, F':'.CaT'' L�iv.r`fy: tC }Y;Y -"4.+'E' `5} 'A •MINE �. a>k V + ,<A. �C. art F1MU3 3 r �"`t' s xt,+.3 ✓ +,e'�f" �$ �'iwt,.�" Y sy > ? s y3� Ez F �n �fss a y iii xr � g9Y4 3 -�2 .id M �' 4 Sib � {� Ams SS n'+-f t+�fr' i• . '"t3 tit> �v?. nn� ,a;, �a `v{ ?� �z L"+'o. �i.,'' r '.�;-� F ,, ' '� x r, � r 'W' L�' ..�. nl3 �^9 r ...aN4 y! �tira� ( I v <$ w �. 'rY Nett fk' ^u- .c-y,.,r..} 5>,.s� fi- _?*�Yt" U .S .a"`v� " ' '1�"r�y � cr,`�" s'�>.'� ��'e�'y' F ,�^��'., f 1. Ey> w *(�`' -.�r:n t :a� "c+ y'.��"�k"� � <' �f .r�y,,,*"xl�. 15 "� �' a sa` Ki.4� d•^ K C <..,�' t<F `yt A 3 .<A' tw'�v.'n�>Xr�.�n � .✓3x3 S f i. RS Fou� A • • • • • • •. • • • : • • • A • • - : A • 0 9 • • • 1 - •. • .•. • • A • •- t a • • - Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 2 Laserfiche We4Unk MyWebunk I Help j Home Browse Search, T.;.n0150.thilk;ZOM4p—ilpfApp7I q",- • mmlr Zoning Board ofAppeals ------— (ZBA) Alphabet)cM h-,dm i.awfiche Search Cubes Path Meet l Sched m 0 TowrOSwftWomng8oa T_-TO of AppeAs(ZEN MUniteVAgendaskezal omes/H uvV date j3 pending 7JIW200112.17.76PM ti ReportsLrj,,—,.Ond,,,d ed1l N-A Sr=2017 11OP14AM f 1pPe-IM R-3 ZBA PoRdes NomeradamassignedUceptipm List Code no-1DC(3) ZBA Book of Mapped 1977 Existing Lm Is Blk Schedule. 5 Agreements,C.�= Lea— MOM 'I Pagel of I � 14 Entices t 'Above: Listed are types of records under ZBA Folder. ZBA Decisions can be found under Board Act!-ons-. Click on "Board Actions"folder to open. < V m -V Pending, 'LLC'a-%NN*Lt A t#U&PeD fule creatibn date ih*F Last MOd14eCf WCO sa4 -- 6620203:5 158 PM I0010-50-1-13A No metacifts assigned -0386860 BzyAwDrlVejLC 1000.37.-5-1 0.1 X77-87 Hard CbirniM 000-61-4-1 4.7387 Har6,rorner-SITE PLAN-Arch Plans 1000-61-4-1 #732,98-Minton.Irrev.-Trust 1000-128,2-20 47389 8ehic 1000--71-1-4 57406,14appa 1000-32-1-1.5 Page 1 of I Above, Lists all Pending Applications under Board Actions/Pending URL Address, Link is http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0 Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 3 Laserfiche WV:PLink {eipa Tiw t s b t -TownOfSouNold Norpe BrowiR-,%Search %Zoning Board of Appeals(ZSA)�Board Actions _ - _t`. r - r'r ,r "r y -,r•�I •„fir':-C•T._ .,�;,'+ .-.,, Board Actions ~' - - Name _- _-`-4- Pa�. conn__—t j tF,1957.1979 Iy� Pathi ED 200 TamiOfSouttioldl2oHng Board } If Of Appeals(ZBA)1BoardMorts •� �.')2001 Creation date I t 2002 i5 --'- -'- - --- ---' -'----- ------ -- - '----- - _ 711012001 122155 PM ,�'In 200.3 ---�- Lastmodified "i EO 2oo4 3RRr7D171036.07AM ga 2005 2006------ - ------------- - --- ----- ---------- -_--.---- - No metadara asswed ®200] �2008 ---------- —— ---- -------'------ ------------_._---- { )3 2009 --'------'— ---'— - '------ -- ----. ..---- -- ------'- — n t 2010 f7av'aP:rm.A Id 2011 { yte'7 2012 Q 2013 _ In2014 -- [;�2015 - - 1016 2017 ':�1tv.N'��•�`E3.�P5,.Yyr ?`z4i ,1>awe>..r> - __! - - � - y' ,:._...1.. (7� Above: Board Actions are listed by year. Click folder to open, All Special Exception , applications that require Coordinated SEQRA Analysis'are stored-in "Pending”. i0me-'9lowse.:Sedrih:%y_1-T�1R1�4'slieid>ZdmnB BN,d of_MDea15120Ati awld Klldrc-+20IF -_ - _ - _ •^_ '�"'_t�t-.3'_ _� _-'- _ _ __ '=--,: '•- :•. .�`: - i �,,.'ice I -, .l``4-+'1; 2017 Va1)1 1 S 69v) 90 PoartlK'ndns TovCfS.•�n11aNQOMIg Xtlorn'12JI7 �- �7yp 6e Bdard Komd beaom,dme l 1>rt�d fr f/EV2tl114]S51 J.•J ±'� �)P1a 116 eemd Xfva NdnM,vJ'Va aa7✓hn41 � t�3 2J1) )J eo>•a Xumu y:ota M dda.dlMdd,e { Y�9 50 Bovtl K9om l 6>0)1 59 .aw,n g TRP )> eovdwnbn 9 A9 3)> eaaNK>om 4j>o:. 6e 9oa,d Kt,on1 � g b2> 318 Q9a,d AlMV ]tl)a )) 9wre Mnm 4 Me W Boartl Kdo,n [�]PM 1 e9a•d Xumn Above: See listed File Numbers. Click on file you are searching. Laserfiche Instructions �- ZBA Files Page 4 tshel` - Above: In addition searching by file no. You can also use the above search tool by typing the name or title of the applicant. -Laserfiche Webl-ink Home Browse' Searklf ��Cuaomtze Search I Sortresults by: Relevance O'L-*e'• -n.e. - _ - +f -- - _ •�" -� —J ��-Records Manage7nen•SearU� f-.-��___.—��_ __—_.^__.-� ---_______.--`.______ 147016 'FlNd name Board ACOons-83 pages) +`Uoox Le1d :7t _ Page count.83 Template name:Board Actions Page 3_ Colin and Kristen Cashel PROPERTY LOCATION 162 Lower Shingle HIIL Fisher.. rof"�3' Page a-19.2017 77016,Cashel SCTM No 1000-9-1-26 minimus approval to remo- Page 5.y 19,2017 07016.C2shel SRM No.f ODO-9.1-26 GRANT,the variances as- I Search terms Page 9.COLIN S KRISTEN CAA IEL SECTION 009 BLOC_ Page 20.•Thomas Ahlgren(Cnshel),PO Boz 342 Fishers Island.NY_. iV Show more information I I ;•,l 97018 Board ACSIonS-S6 page(s) Page count 56 Template name.Board Actions Page 411-9:30 A M.{OLIN CAS14ELAND Varlahces under Artfde IdSeUon ANN- "JI NN_"I Page 48..ance(s)KRISTEN CASHELs7016-Request proposed trellis located In other tha,.. ' e. sShow more information- Above: Shows you files that can be found using a phrase, name or title. Or you can search by Tax Map No. (District, Block and Lot) using the format 1000-111.4-1. Laserfiche Web Link - �".��,,".� - (o�� - + ''^11YM'cb1;nk..t Nelp`t'Ahwt 1 Sh Home _Browse -Search _ 7rnsnOfScuNokl>_ZJMn$Board ofAppeals(ZBFJ>MlnlrteS/�Gndas/tegill Hotkes8)edrings_`- �'�__.,.,, ,..,.___ , _-_ 1 - Minutes/Agendas/Legal IJ3m)e- -_ _- _T_....�____._._.____..._ ..,.____._.� {�tg�' �t�}� ;�x ice•,s:�r,� � Notices/Hearings 6,1957-1979 A Entry PropenleS. _^_- �":1980-1999 ' W 2000-2009 Path Tmw�ISs;utic'Al2avng Ocar•1 Ll 2010 of Appe,% , tjD 2011 _ - (Zt7A)V+1•nuD`Yi�2fd NetKevttearings �2012 Creadondate c`2013 i1102001 Z57 a0 PM C',2016 _ Last modified y-,2075 - 12/1rv701b115`•tF'M ,-1 2010 a Metadata W-2017 No me-aaata als.grlee Page 1 of 1 _-_- -- --- - _-- ---___- t 1 En __ ._._- _ ._ f�x��,,,yr�•„w�Avn.ea>La.wEt4W.Nnlf el!K]57�t�vr.:�r�rc-._e+c Above: Also, Minutes, Agendas, and Hearing Transcripts can be viewed. ' LasedlcheInstructions ZBA Files Page 15H—___—____ Townbfso '7 Home �roww Nome P WM 2017 Path ZBA-0110SM17flearing 40 HA 1/0512017 LN 3 NobaesfHearini creation date "�a"1119120 17 Agenda 2 Z-1 zBA-a3iowwHeaAng .' '`~` Q_.—___. — Above:' Agendas, Minutes end'Transcripts are in chronological order. . Revised 6/15/2020 . . 14U' TI (w'0E t� F HEARIi4o' The following application will be heard by the Southold Town Board of Appeals at Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold The application will ALSO be available VIA ZOOM WEBINAR - Follow pink - httpm./Isoutholdtownny. gov/calendar.aspx NAME THE ENCLAVES HOTEL & RESTAURANT # 7046SE SCTM # : 1000-63-3- 15 VARIANCE: SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST: CONVERT EXISTING TWO STORY HOME INTO A 74 SEAT RESTAURANT AND CONSTRUCT A 44 UNIT HOTEL INCLUDING 4 DETACHED COTTAGES E ATE THURS . , OCT. 14, 202 'i 5 : 00 PM You may review the file(s) on the town's website under Town Records/Weblink: ZBA/ Board Actions/ Pending. ZBA Office telephone (631 ) 765-1809 + +rlvir� ; TOWN OF $OUT>FIOLD ( Mtn ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF In the Matter of the Application of. MAILINGS (Name of Applicant/Owner) fy + � (SIDA-00 SCTM No. 1000- (Address of Property) (Section, Block & Lot) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK 1, ( ) Owner, ( )Agent residing at �7L/ New York, being duly sworn, deposes and says that: On the day of , 202), I personally mailed at the United States Post Office in //10,�V�l�—e ,New York,by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in Prepaid envelopes addressed to current property owners shown on the current assessment roll Verified from the official records on file with the( ) Assessors, or ( ) County Real Property Office, for every property which abuts and is across a public or private street,or vehicular right-of-way of record, surrounding the applicant's property. (Sign tur� Sworn to before me this SPETH J.Wttli 4411 day of 1.2 , 202 NaWy P,Nbk state of Now Yoh Qualified In Nassau eou* No.02ME6244383 - A�rCa�rnmite�n lcxpi�s �Z/�/ZC Z� otary Public) / PLEASE list on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet ol`paper, the lot numbers next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. All original USPS receipts and mailing confirmations to be submitted to the ZBA Office along with this form completed, signed aid notarized. Ln Ln M 11,111:19-M.Ell ru L awadimms U "il -0 A Certified Mail Fee N Ln Uertitied Mail Fee Extra Services&Fees(check box, d eaesapproansfe) U-1 Ph Q ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) )l f $ Return Receipt(electronic) $ Extra Serviuus dt Fees(oreCkbox,add fee as appropriate) 0 F-I Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ Postmark, Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ 0 OAdult Signature Required Here Return Receipt(electronic) $ PO C3 ❑F-I Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ st Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ Jam;Postage IM C-3 E]Adult Signature Required []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ r-I $ 62-3-38 r-3 Postage 63-3-17.4 M rog'-p—Os'56600 Main LLC r-I $ $ r-I T--tal—Postage Bilal Altintoprak C-0 sent To PO Box 389 $ PO Box 1690 ------ 1:113 Sent To wiia,, Cutchogue, NY 1193 5 ------ Southold, NY 11971 C3 CityCity,State ie.Zp+_ CO Co CO !o 1'U (Ull CO CO . ... .. 0 43 $ -J� 01-21 F C�, 77 ru Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee a appropriate) El" Certified Ivian Fee r-:1 El Return Receipt(hardcopy) C3 (electronic) CO $ C3 $ Extra Services&Fe .—(ch.ckbo-,add fee as app 11=.ceipt estncted Delivery $ 10 / / 0 M Postmark El Return Receipt(hardcopy) i 0 OAdult Signature Required r-I $_ E3AdultSfQn.t_­_.___,_ $ C3 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $_ _3 Postmark P-.,.9u C3 ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ c- r-3 El Adult Signature Required Here( OA ❑ Return Re tum Certified d ,u m in Receipt d M U"S g-a Ij R tu c "a a Receipt a" R p p R t Signature es (electronic) n'c' $---- "�dDalve $ �,,g at Ad it Signature R.-' ad $ t.g,_ P-s $ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ 63-3-24 M Total Pf ta 0 p C3 Postage $ ' Joseph F. & Marilyn Krukowski �z . 63-3-12 ,T 9 1 rq $ 1 Posit I Sent To nj 59475 Route 25 M Total Post NKK LLC Si, $= T N 19, Southold, NY 11971 C3 Sent 44 Peacock Path ru C3 Riverhead, NY 11901 CE) 43 Ln M IR•M!! ED CO IT, L Certified all Fee 4t 1ru rq $ Ir a EXtra�Services Fee (check box,add fee as aponoptiate) C3 Fee 131 -3 El Return Receipt(hardcopy) $— CO I-3 $ 0 1, Services r Extra &Fees(check box add fee as appropiste) 01 El Return Receipt(electronic) $_ P Mark ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy)Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ El Adult Signature Required $_ ere El Return Receipt(electronic) $ E=31 LI Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ Q El 71 E:3 0 Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ C3 is r9 H C3 jC3 1 M-31 ❑Adult Signature Required � Postage —.i , - $, 7H. rlc- rq $ 63-3- C3 OAdult Signature Restricted Delivery$ COotal Pos 14 Postage $ 63-3-28.1 CO $ Eugen & Mirella Tomasic M Total Pa r-I Sent To 876 Willis Avenue, Ste, 2 C3 $ Witzke Capital LLC C3 r- SIKWZ5i Albertson, NY 11507 -------- ru Sent 56215 Route 25 Cary,staff sfieet8l C3 PO Box 937 -------- -----gta Southold, NY 11971 TM PostatserviceS a- Domestic Mall Onl�, CERTI D . EGE ■ , Postal Ln CERTIFIED, MAIL tl) Q B• ° M � Certified Mad Fee s .�.w 0^ Cs: C1 €3 �� ,� � �� 5)N, .a-a 4� / 1 s $ Certified Mad Fee �` :ak I % ` Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee as appropriate) 1 L 9 I ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ ly�.;, $ i 1 1:3 $� _ Extra SeNlces&Fees(check box,add fee as appropriate) i) �t 1 Q ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ '✓ Postmark ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ c- zQ ❑Certifled Mail Restricted Delivery $ '�HOra .� ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ PostmGJO ❑Adult Signature Required $ `�,i r;' Q ❑Certifled Mall Restricted Deimery $ Her �� []Adult Signar•_e r> torted Delivery$- _ ---` Q []Adult Signature Required $ ~ - �% yF 0 Postage i 63-3-16 - — [:]Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ - � $ Lauren E. Barr m Postage ,63-3 71 3 -- --- � Total Posta, y i l $ 56755 Route 25 � Total Poste, 56863 Main Rd. LLC � sent To Southold, NY 11971 �__._ ca senrro 95 Hopper St. M �tieet aril'' N -treatan---!, Westbury,NY 11590 ry ZlP+4s-- ------- ---------' Ctry,state, - PS Form :11 April 201511 111.1. - pS form i I --------- -- -----' - 3800i April 20151 1 111•1' - I U.,S.,;Postal Service" Postal CERTIFIED O ■ ■ CE ■ 13 RECEIPT i (` Domestic Mail Only CQ 6r") r-9 Domestic A4ail Only Certified Mad Fee ,•w i k $ F / ` Certified Mad Fee rq Extraservices&Fees(check box,add fee as appropdbte p , - r� $ Q ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ i..1 ,.F yyd }() ) Extra SONICes&Fees(check box,add fee as appropdate) ®� ,) O ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ ' pOStmar f Q ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ Q 171 Certified Mad Restricted Delivery $ �` Nere/kj Q Return Receipt(electronic) $ � Stmark GAI Q ❑AdultSignatureRequired $ / •} Q ❑ �.(vlore 'e f ��_ Cs Certified Mels Restricted Delivery $ 't l c�'S Q Adult Signature Required $ E]Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ `� J ❑ g q �`-_�T�� y.'• Q Postage '� ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ im�' $ 62-3-37 - .,.. .,.�.� = o Postage�--� 1..q Total Postage $ 63-3-17.2 CD $ i Southland Corp TotalP°l Emily Barbera ' o sent To Attn: Ad Valorem Tax senrro Dorothy Geraci ' rti• s«e��a°dAPr,PO Box 711 -- Q --------! 738 Ascon Road c, srdre,z%F Dallas, TX 75221-9867 Street an r` !Franklin Square,NY 11010 --------- � TM ' :11 1 11 111•1 - --- - I - :11 1 11 111•I Postal CERTIFIED o RECEIPT • Domestic Only ■ ® s ■ U') Ln B M Er F FCu) jpt�a Certified Mall Fee a ?� sr `�» >Y Q • G �'° a2 ;R. ' .yFsa Q^ Certified Mad Fee Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee as appropnate) `g' yl 'l Q $ Q El Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ `) ; s!`' 1 "' Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add fee as appropnafe ` , 1 Q [I Return Receipt(electronic) $ �� , ,; {�pos(m� g ' ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ ( �, - 1r i} ; Q []Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ '`� Here J I Y' ❑Return Receipt(electronic) -$ - , ) 1- 'Postmark' Q []Adult Signature Required $ - �y'' Q -❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery •$ 'i`' _ s Here-� _,rp []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ ,�..) /✓ Q []Adult Signature Required $ / Q Posta e ---��-"'� Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ M $ g 163-3-13 _ . �" ° g Q Postage �- ,� Total Jorge & Sonia Torrento r_-i $ Donna L.Dill,PE,Manager, Civil-In'S_p Co $ 56365 Main Road m Total PosU Structures Department, MTA LIRR r_9 Sent To i $ 1 Hillside Maintenance Complex Sf%eetani Southold,NY 11971 �_______ C3 senrro Mailcode 314nj3 City,State.. -- __ _ !_______ Q sit°eetaffd 93-59 183rd Street Ci ' Hollis,NY 11423 - i City Staid :11 1 11 111•1, I ' `------_--- -- I BI 1 11 111•I - ■oCeTIVI © RECEIPT '�Dqr�estic Mail I� � CIO n ru a- Certified Mad Fee M $ Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee as appropriate)l t ❑Return Recelpt(hardcopy) $ t—j * 7 `F'a tmark Q ❑Return Receipt(electrenic) $ ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ Hero 1 r t Q I ❑Adult Signature Required •$ []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ O Postage' -0 63-3-1.1 m T� t pa 11070 Boisseau Ave. LLC N Sent To 2412 National Drive C3 Sffieef ani Brooklyn,NY 11234 Cary State ---- --------- I i @AN BROWN 53S\-_a0ADHOLLOW ROAD I SUITE 301 MELVILLE, NEW YORK 1 1 747 ALTMAN & D L E O , LLP TEL 51 6-222-0222 1 FAX 51 6-222-0322 KBDA@Q 6ROWNALTMAN.COM I WWW.BROWNALTMAN.COM October 6, 2021 VLA FEDERAL EXPRESS Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall P.Q.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Attn: Kim Fuentes, Secretary Re: Special Exception Use Permit application (the "Application") to the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") by 56655 Main St LLC (the "Applicant")in connection with the property located at 56655 Main Road,Southold, New York 11971, a/k/a SGTM No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the"Property") Dear Ms. Fuentes: In connection with the mailing requirements for the above Application, attached hereto are the following for your file: 1. Stamped United States Postal Service certified mailing receipts; and 2. Original signed and notarized Affidavit of Mailings, dated October 4,2021. If you have any further questions or concerns, feel free to contact the undersigned. j ruly yo ,ony C. Curcio - C 1�—nC(e&W-5 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD bibowMN4W—) ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK �� �� AFFIDAVIT OF In the Matter of the Application of- POSTING - - --- - - ---- ---- -------------- SCTM No. 1000- (Name of Applicants) (Section, Block & Lot) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK I, R n6fELO V �2�Y�be� residing at U a EJ(Y) S l fie. '- 11.Y1 tl Y1Co �'1 , New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: I am the (Owner or ( ) Agent for owner of the subject property rd On the 3— day of Dc�� , 2021 , I personally placed the Town's Official Poster on subject property located at: ab ScL,*hofdJ NY indicating the date of hearing and nature of application noted thereon, securely upon subject property, located ten (10) feet or closer from the street or right-of-Way (driveway entrance) facing the street or facing each street or right-of-way entrance,* and that; I hereby confirm that the Poster has remained in place for seven (7) days prior to the date of the subject hear' g date, whi aring date wa shown to be DC.fp 4 apol (0 InL/Agent Signature) Sworn to before me this Day of ID , 20J 'MSAAMES NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF MEW YORK Re alffition No.01AV630M (Notary Public) _ "$""4"`C""'' �D!es` .Jant+rYTA.1023, * near the entrance or driveway entrance of property, as the area most visible to passerby e - L •Vii... 1r^'- - w � 4+ YY" w - �.. NOTICE OF NEARING ' �,� + V ' TTA leibw+ap i��iCMron w111►.MM pJ�M i[W1..M fcw=/..rr . ~ r •- _ a ML SON•r Mw Mw VIa 1OpIJ weJIIFJ r - - ti Tr.o�Ppw�.�lrr�'r v cnitnd � - '� •,�_�,. v southoldtownny.yo A I NAME THE ENCLAVES HO RESTAURANT 70465 A • ' scTM X: lDOO-63-3.15 EP7 r •. ION VARIANCE:SPECIAL lEx i r� ,We IWO '•'...< «.v v'j _ ' tom+ h v,�:+w ,i �.,.�-.. r' 'Ci JSd'-ie1 ._.I.. [fLsItNI ifu-.IWMaeCMrn�•2�02CO! S5TWiC:0 07AM T /om"JT REQUESN SEA'uaTwcao-"Po TRS n 14, � a 1 4 y wa i..� DAT:e E• T, w, /t rr e , .l •• 1" :� -- J ; j , s , a i +J tet'- .� -_ T/Ft.� '�"i � J • --- - - `, f. �•� fly �!"�. . .a. 4r _ . NI 1 "� I, -►* S! �.w� ',7y�. r ..,�:'3"�A. � \ , -y 71 • air .,. 6 t• ! v r . IIMRIV "_^�. : '� t � � �.� 'tet ,- ''�,•_ yIg• �.y r + s� f, � r� ,`yam[+`• {�, y. "� q •, it`.C��{�{#-" f ,i s p . Y� Westermann, Donna From: Andrew Giambertone <AVG@Gia mbertoneArchitects.com> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 11:50 AM To: Westermann, Donna; Fuentes, Kim Cc: David N.Altman; Sakarellos, Elizabeth Subject: RE: Packet for Public Hearing -The Enclaves Thank you. The FedEx account number is: 1815-3233-5. From: Westermann, Donna <donnawCc@southoldtownny.gov> Sent: Friday,September 17, 202110:18 AM To:Andrew Giambertone <AVG @Gia m berto neArchitects.com>; Fuentes, Kim <kimf@southoldtownny.gov> Cc: David N.Altman <daltman@brownaltman.com>; Sakarellos, Elizabeth <elizabeth.sakarellos@town.southold.ny.us> Subject: RE: Packet for Public Hearing-The Enclaves Yes,we can FedEx, please provide your account info. Thank you, Donna From: Andrew Giambertone [mailto:AVG@GiambertoneArchitects.com] ' Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 10:16 AM To: Fuentes, Kim; Westermann, Donna Cc: David N. Altman; Sakarellos, Elizabeth Subject: RE: Packet for Public Hearing -The Enclaves Good Morning Kim and Donna, If you could mail them it would be great.Also if I give you my FedEx account number could you please FedEXthem out for Monday delivery? If not please put them in the mail to: Giambertone Architects 62 Elfin Street Huntington NY 11743 Much Appreciated, Andrew Andrew V. Giambertone, A i A 5 President AV GQGiambertonearchitects.com Andrew V. Gfamb'ertone & Associates, Architects, P 02 i7lenStreet, 1-Iandngt)�a, N,lewYor}; t17 3 Vhane: (6,31) 367X050 1-ax; (Cali) �O7.6636 (sr cht,namo rcdrarfbloftly.I rma r�aarc rr zc�rati�lkttiral,g rae�'r t t riallr y�var: 9 i4�ir�rrer tsrrry. tF ih traites of tugs nscssx c'i%Mot the irl0.adcd eriircwnt,you a=humlx notified that goy diswumution,dL%Ld,udcrom,or aapyirig of WN r wmt:uinf�ts m it ssei€tty prcvhslsbNl.If yerii 1)4-.V ncchre.l t€tis rtwtotn rzta xt itt arm,p)eAsC ttrxti ti ® ))Pa��cyfkage ( id&FedRa8138 7336 918 0 0 0 P UV Air bill Tracking ��� ,.• ,3 Ex ress Number 1 From Pleasey notandp Irshard. _ _ 4 Express Package Service •Tomostlucebons Packages up to150lbs. S (B •y Senders FedEx Porpeckagosorer 15016x.osotne Account Number r�d�xF,rpra:,forsnrusamn t u Senders ❑ FedExfrstOvemight ❑ FedEx 2D ayA.M Name Phone I Earfiestnert busness mamm de livery oselec Second business mmnmg• Iocaaons.rndayslupma,on, be delivered an Saturday Delivery NOrevadahle. f Mondayunless Saturday Delrveryasetected C m �df ❑ FedExPncM$ernI,9 ❑ FedEx2Day Company Nex huaness moming•Fndey shipmem vnA he Secondbusmessaftemoon-Thursdayshipmems y delivered on Monday unless Saturday Delivery Dolhedelrvared on Monday unless Saturday • is selected Oelrvaryis selected o FedEx Standard Overnight ❑ FedEx Express Saver eo d� ,s Address S Nezthusmmoo essefteThudbaanessda 1 DeptMoodSerte/Room State ZIP SaN day De!ryNDravevadahle Sew day0e rveryNDr aregable N ~ 5 Packaging •oeataredramredQm C ❑ FedEx Envelope* ❑ FedEx Pak* ❑ge Ex ❑FedEx Tube Other { 2 Your Internal Billing Reference OPTIONAL W First2scharecterswAlappearonmvmce - r^ 3 To 6 Special Handling and Delivery Signature Options Fees may apply Sea the FedExSemce GuideRecipi ( ,1 Nae nes, 1:1 %r-1W°Y-0lFwedeEryxSndard OemiA htFd&TDayAM.,or FedE[ExpresSavr ma x �� address, z No SignatureRequoed ��CSDtrectSignature If moo'. avaSablamrenp,em's s'+ )�rA .1 ❑ Packall mayhalelivir. 1� Someone at Company address ❑address,someone meneiehhomg o Company ML^za obtaining fordefrvery .l�"�� maysAnfordebvery address maysign fordsGvary For HoldWeekday residermaldeferenesoniy —i HoldFodEx eekigq8fday Does this shipment contain dangerous goods. �- m f,1 REGUIRED evano lofor Ono box must be chocked —� D Address ❑FedEx Rrst DvemiAht Ca We cennotdelrvarto PO boxes or PO ZIPcodes DepuReorsude/Room yes yes Hold Satunr�dAam�y D�No ❑Yes ❑ SNppefsDaclaraaon ❑ Drylce B.Ed1d S;; laN UNG'fm Shippeft Doclarabom retrequued. Dryme,9,UN 1645 x kA' 0 __ ❑ Cargo Aircraft Only andResmchonsappNfordergemus goods—see the curre ffed5cSamce Guile 2, ` Address forthe HOLD location addressortor cormnuahon efyourshippmg address maY _ -7 Payment eillro o 3131 a/� ErrterredEzAcct No ar gedrtCard No below C —� p 1. State Y�' ZIP Sender _ ❑ acct No msecmn Recipient Third Pa Cred¢Card Cash/Check m I lvv'0bab�9ed P ❑� ❑ ❑ m y Fed&Acct No rs Oram m OeddCerdNo. O Total Palkages Total Weight Total Declared Valuer r-y-,_p_pn �_-_ _R p.• y-�/,,fk,.,, y t i _Ihs S 10 l A l�`.JGL•k�Jlc'��p'}It164VY71LIPFLI-•lLlf-�ALAR71iTu7nL��•j�T, -g^^�A•P�11'r � DurhahiGtyisfimrtedtoU5310Aunless udaclareah�ghervalueSaebacFedExtals.ayumngthumingter F6 474 agreemthe semce condmons onthe eckofthis anbill end inthe cuuent Fed&Sainte Ginda,including terms thathmd our hablxy Rev Date 3115•Part/157001•®1012-1015 FedEx-PRINTED IN USA RROA 00r00 `t `i , From: Fuentes, Kim <kimf@southoldtownny.gov> Sent: Friday,September 17, 20219:48 AM To:Andrew Giambertone <AVG@GiambertoneArchitects.com> Cc: David N.Altman<daltman@brownaltman.com>;Westermann, Donna <donnaw@southoldtownny.gov>; Sakarellos, Elizabeth <elizabeth.sakarellos@town.southold.nv.us> Subject: Packet for Public Hearing-The Enclaves j Hi, We have the packet ready for your public hearing scheduled for October 14 at 5:00 PM. Let us know if you wish to pick it up or have us mail it to you. Please confirm the mailing address, and please respond to Donna at donnaw2southoldtownny.gov or call us at 631-765- 1809. Thank you. Kim E. Fuentes Board Assistant Zoning Board of Appeals 631-765-1809 kimfna.southoldtownny gov Location: 54375 Main Road Mail:P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 i (Uri IV r ",&x (C 0V TA1►le!�,� G rcce.0 f►�f �,,,, �►� t __s RECENE� V� " NOV 13 2019 Board Of APPeals AUTg1 zoning HO Jeffrey W. Szabo Administrative Offices:4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, New York 11769-0901 Chief Executive Officer (631)563-0353 November 5,2019 Fax: (631)563-0370 Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road ✓ First Floor, Capital One Bank Southold,NY 11971 RE: DEIS, Special Exception-The Enclaves,44 Unit Rest/Hotel SCTM# 1000-063.00-03.00-015.000 Dear Ms. Kanes Weisman: The Suffolk County Water Authority(SCWA)would like to thank you for the opportunity to comment on the DEIS for the captioned project. In August 2017 SCWA relayed concerns about the amount of potable water to be used for irrigation purposes and recommended that an irrigation well be used for all irrigation needs., SCWA also , recommended the use of smart irrigation control systems and the use of drought tolerant plants to promote conservation. The DEIS as submitted indicates that the proposed development will utilize an existing irrigation well if viable,or install a new irrigation well if needed. The document also conveys the applicant's desire to use smart irrigation controls and drought tolerant plants. Our agency is pleased that the applicant is following through on SCWA's recommendations and request that the project use low flow plumbing fixtures to further our conservation efforts. The proposed action also includes the construction of an on-site STP to accommodate all sanitary waste,with groundwater monitoring wells installed both upstream and downstream of the effluent disposal system. SCWA strongly supports these monitoring efforts. Should you have any questions or wish to discuss this project further, I may be reached at 631- 563-0353. • Vrej'W. y LA.J yours /L.J Szabo cc: Patrick Halpin, Chairman, SCWA Joseph Pokorny,Deputy CEO Operations, SCWA RECEIVED :�—Pis 9 o�b S� 44-VAAVACHARLES R.CUDDY NOV 14 2019 ATTORNEY AT LAW 445GRIFFINGAVENUE Zoning Board Of Appeals RIVERHEAD,NEW YORK � .I,n Address: November 13, 2019 TEL: (631)369-8200 PO.tl 1547 FAX: (631)369-9080 Riverhead,NY 11901 E-mail: charlescuddy@optonline.net Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold 53095 Main Road, PO Box 1179 ^ Southold,New York 11971 / 1 RE: The Enclaves Rotel and Restaurant Dear Ms. Weisman: I am writing to express severe disappointment with the SEQRA/Special Exception hearing that took place the evening of November 7, 2019. The applicant's understanding was that the substance and conclusions in the extensive DEIS would be examined and questioned and the standards for the Special Exception would be reviewed. Instead there were a number of virtually irrelevant concerns voiced respecting affordable housing, finding sufficient help, competition to existing bed and breakfast establishments together with an extended journey into minutia, such as the fish in the proposed pond. The hearing devolves into a freewheeling forum, essentially a new scoping session. No one can question the right to be heard in a public forum,provided that the speaker has some connection to the subject matter. Many comments at this hearing were made by persons residing 5 or 10 miles from the Hamlet Business site in question. This is not an academic exercise and little weight should be given to the concerns of those not directly impacted by this project. The applicant has expended many thousands of dollars to produce the DEIS, as well as to have it thoroughly reviewed by the Town's Consultant. Planning/Engineers/Ecology, Traffic and Sound experts have been retained. Together with a recognized architect and Environmental Planner, hundreds of hours were spent preparing and revising the DEIS. We submit it is thorough and complete. While its conclusions may be questioned we are surprised at the continuing intense interest in both traffic and sound based ostensibly on Special Event Use. There are numerous wineries along the Main Road (State Route 25)throughout the Town, many of them in Agriculture/Residential districts. They all have Special Events with large assemblage of vehicles. Traffic moves in and out both east and west (left and right) onto the Main Road without incident. Why would this applicant be held to a different standard - contrary to the experience with similar venues? As to sound the standard set forth in the Town Code suffers from a number of problems. Taken literally, Section 280 is an absolute prohibition. It would restrict speed as well as noise from RECEIVED X04(a NOV 14 2019 November 13, 2019 Page 2 Zoning Board Of Appeals entering vehicles. There is no time frame. Does a violation take place within a few seconds, a minute, an hour? Interpretation of this Section requires reasonableness, since it is more than likely that as written it cannot be sustained. The applicant's sound engineer has indicated that various mechanisms and barriers can deflect and trap sound and these will be readily used at this site. Both traffic and sound should not require further investigation. This 44 room hotel on 6.75 acres is a well thought out, aesthetically pleasing and sensitively designed proposal. It has undergone intensive review. Additional matters to be addressed by the applicant should be limited and not expanded by further comment. Very truly yours, ChA04 Charles R. Cuddy CRC:dmc C: William Duffy, Town Attorney 845 Town Harbor Terrace PO Box 1141 Southold,NY 11971 November 8, 2019 RECEIVED Zoning Board of Appeals C (/ Town of Southold . Q7v NOV 18 2019 54375 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 aaard&Appel& Dear Ms. Weisman: Re: The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant#7046 Traffic on Route 25: Living off Town Harbor Lane,I am most concerned with the increase in traffic that this development is going to bring to a section of Route 25 which is already a bottle-neck. Considering the normal traffic in season,plus trucks parked on either side of 25 obstructing vision(drivers running into 7/11), it is difficult to make a left turn now. Adding 100 cars making a left hand into The Enclave opposite cars trying to make a left hand turn from Town Harbor Lane with heavy traffic coming from the East is asking for an accident. At the same time cars will be coming out of 7/11 turning East and West while cars are coming out of The Enclaves turning East and West directly opposite them. The location of the roads into and out of The Enclaves is unexceptable. The lack of housing for employees/traffic: This has always been a local problem whether bringing migrant workers from the south or importing Irish workers for the summer season. How about The Enclaves forgetting the restaurant? There are three restaurants, a coffee house, 7/11 and two delis in walking distance of the hotel where the guests can eat and drink. Instead,turn the old house into employee housing(aka Affordable Housing). This would help relieve some of the housing problems for employees and cut down on the number of cars entering and leaving the property. Extreme use of water. My neighbors and I on Town Harbor Terrace depend on our wells for water. During a draught people with town water are asked to conserve it while being allowed to use well water to water their lawns. What water will The Enclave be using to water their hedges,lawns, gardens and service their pools particularly during a draught.. Not well water! The meeting last night was very informative. It was obvious that those involved in this development were for it and everyone who lives near it and those who will be effected by it, are against it. This parcel may be zoned commercial however it is still in an area which is very residential. How many houses would be allowed on 6.75 aces? This development as it stands is too big for the area. Sincerely, e, Eve McGrath Fuentes, Kim ,rte_ r From: Jeanmarie DiNoto <northforkgir16@icloud.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 2:31 PM To: Fuentes, Kim SER Subject: Re:the Enclaves Attn Leslie Kanes Weisman C ai Ape Is Dear Ms Weisman, I would like to add my voice to that of my my concerned neighbors in Founders Landing, in their objection to the proposed hotel, the Enclave. I support the Southold Comprehensive Plan which encourages small scale community and residential development. I feel that the last thing we need is a hotel, which will encourage more people to come to Southold. There are plenty of hotels, motels in the surrounding area. According to figures in last week's Suffolk Times, we have had a "boom" in population on the East End with the Town of Southold reported increasing from 21,968 to 23,732. Those of us who are permanent residents here deserve better. As it is, we have to wait in order to enter the Main Road from our area of residence. I live on Founders Path year round and find the increase in traffic on Main Road 25 dangerous and worthy of traffic lights, which we all want to avoid. I will be attending the ZBA meeting on Thursday, October 14th. Thank you for your kind attention. Jeanmarie DiNoto 1635 Founders Path Southold Sent from my iPad Fuentes, Kim From: LYNNE NORMANDIA <Inormandia@aol.com> Sent: Monday, September 6, 2021 3:28 PM SEP 7 2n9l To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant Zoning Board of Appeals y Dear Southold Zoning Board of Appeals: Leslie Weisman, Robert Lehnert, Eric Dantes, Patricia Acampora, Nick Planamento May I add my 2 cents to the public CONSTERNATION already posted here? Have we done our MATH? 40 rooms plus 4 cottages means there will be at least DOUBLE that amount of guests. Tourists coming out here come for the BEACHES: not for a swimming pool. Will you be issuing them all beach passes? Is our Town destined to become a catering hall? Our Main Road is already regularly backed up from IGA in both directions. We get bumper-to- bumper traffic on all our main east-west arteries. Why do we encourage MORE people and cars to come here? Can't we proudly hang out a sign that our show is SOLD OUT? Lynne Normandia Leeton Drive ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. Fuentes, Kim From: Richard Bird <Richardb26@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, September 6, 2021 3:50 PM DSEP7 To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: Proposed hotel in southold Dear ZBA Board: The proposed 40 room hotel and 70 seat restaurant is so out of character with the heart of a small village like ours. Does Southold really need more traffic in an already congested area, more drainage problems, more sewage, and more garbage? Of course not! Why do we spend tax payers' money creating our zoning laws if an exception can be made for anyone that can spend the time and the money to have the law turned to their favor. Southold town has at least 2 very large buildings (Youngs Ave and the old North Fork Bank building) that have been sitting there for years unoccupied. Let's use what we have before we move ahead and build something else that might possibly fail and become another eye sore. I encourage you to vote this project down in any shape or size. Don't accept a reduction in the number of rooms or the size of the restaurant as a bargaining ploy, only to have the applicant come back down the road asking for more. Once it's gone it's gone for ever........ Sincerely. Richard Bird. Lake Drive. Southold Sent from my iPad ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 1 Fuentes, Kim �®� � From: eve mcgrath <gdmcg2@hotmail.com> RECEIVED Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 4:24 PM i To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: Enclave SEPI j 'IZ Min 8aa'rd of Appeals There will be a major traffic problem for those coming out of Town Harbor Lane. Will need two way traffic and a traffic light at Hobart/Boisseau and 25.main road Sent from my iPhone ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 1� RECEIVED SEP 0 2021 SUSAN LLEWELLYN&THOMAS LULEVITCH 2o5 FOUNDERS PATH,SOUTHOLD NY I1971 SEPTEMBER 5TH 202I ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ATTENTION:THE SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD As long time residents of the historic area of Founders Path in Southold Village,I am writing with regard to the pro- posed development of The Enclaves Hotel and additional entertainment facilities While I appreciate new avenues for local business ventures,I am alarmed by the projected size and potentially detrimental impact of said development. i) The disruption and chaos inevitably caused by so much additional traffic (cars,limos,delivery and maintenance vehicles)will negatively impact the entire downtown.The nearby residential and commercial zones will all be at risk- .2) isk2) The proposed building site with the suggested ports of entry and exit are well meaning,but utterly insufficient for such a small town center 3) Even NOW it is difficult to make a left hand turn from Cottage Place,Locust Lane and Town Harbor Road.The additional traffic from the proposed development will add further chaos to congestion already caused by 7-Eleven and Mullen Motors.Adding more vehicles to the current traffic problem is unacceptable. 4) The proposition of having a"traffic controller"is an insufficient and frankly absurd solution. Is the controller going to be there all hours of the day and night,not only when each venue closes but when delivery trucks are finally exiting>It will be much later than iopm,I can assure you. 5) The noise level is a potentially serious problem I appreciate live music but not for over Zoo people,on a regular basis.Private parties,music events are held in Founders Landing on the beach but they are not every weekend and it's scrupulously monitored in terms of noise level.Having music entertainment for overnight guests so close to residen- tial neighborhoods is not feasible,no matter how thick the"glass noise barriers"are. 6) Beach access. I am all in favor of anyone having access to the beaches,but again the added traffic is a big concern. There are no sidewalks on all the beach access roads for joggers,dog walkers,parents with babies in strollers.Traffic is already dangerously TOO FAST,especially along Hobart and Town Harbor.The concept of a shuttle service is one possible solution but there must be a rule that vehicles without beach stickers are not allowed in the beach car park or surrounding streets (as most hotel guests will not choose to wait for a shuttle) It must also be stressed that Town Harbor beach is small, especially at high tide,during which it becomes a very narrow sliver of sand,thus pushing beach goers further into protected grassland.It will also mean a lot more rubbish to clean up,are we the tax payers to be responsible for this?We,as year round residents see the dreadful impact on the beach from extra tourists on Memorial and Labor Day weekends.It is unacceptable that the beach could get as polluted,every single weekend from large numbers of hotel guests 7) The most serious concern is the environmental impact on the water and drainage system of the proposed site. There is no actual guarantee from the developers that they will not overload the delicate water balance An impact assessment MUST be done by an independent assessor appointed by the town,if this development proposal is to be even considered. Finally,the developers are requesting a SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT.This is unacceptable given the very real concerns outlined above.There is absolutely NO reason to grant it.Please do the right thing ZBA for Southold's health and security.Please honor the integrity,beauty and most importantly,the safety of historic Southold Village. i-� 11-11.2-1 Zoning Board of Appeals ,= Town Hall Annex Building 2021 Southold, NY 11971 SEP To: Members of the Board: zOni�4O BOARD O�APaBA�5 I am writing this letter to express my strong opposition to the request for the Special Exception permit requested by the Enclaves.` Although there are many statements in the Final Environmental Impact Statement that I find incredibly outrageous, I will react to the ones I find most misleading and inaccurate. 1. "No significant adverse traffic impacts on or off-site will occur." Good luck with that! As we saw this summer with the work done by PSE&G, traffic along Main Street in Southold cannot sustain added number of vehicles at the entrance/egress proposed for the property no matter how many traffic controls are hired to "guide safe movement to and from the site". And safety just at that spot alone is questionable even now! And......what is this about a "new 4-way intersection" ?????? Do we really even want to discuss such a monster? And how does anyone predict that Local patrons 'Will not travel long distance to the restaurant"? 2. The most OUTRAGEOUS part of this proposal is the disruption of the "Community's sense of place and our residential, rural and historic character" which the Southold Comprehensive Plan promotes. The architectural drawing is not in keeping with those goals AT ALL'and frankly, is quite ugly. I strongly urge the ZBA Board to listen to the people who love, live and care about this village and don't want to see its beauty and character ruined by a decidedly unwelcome project. Sincerely, Kathleen McCabe 29 Meadow Court Southold, NY 11971 Julia Earley 115 Hobart Road Southold, NY 11971 RECEfVEED September 7,2021 SEP 0 8 20?_1 Zoning Board of Appeals ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Town Hall Annex 54375 Rt. 25 PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 To Whom it May Concern, I am writing to express my deep concern over the proposed hotel and event space on the Main Road, right across from where 1 live. In 2018 1 was struggling to get around the traffic and congestion in my neighborhood in Mineola due to the congestion caused by construction and development of the surrounding area of my home. I decided to relocate my family, and move to Southold, a place that we loved because of the natural beauty of its' surroundings, and feeling of community that a small town like this has to offer. My home on Hobart Road is already impacted by cars parked up and down the street, racing past my house, making it difficult to get out of my driveway during the summer months. The idea that the proposed hotel and event space will not impact our community is ludicrous. Events that will host 250, 100 or a rooftop bar for another 50 people will have a devastating impact on the traffic, and make it impossible for those of us who live here to get around our town. In addition, our beaches are already at capacity,there is no way there is adequate space, especially in our Park District, for additional people to be shuttled back and forth. This is completely unacceptable. We pay taxes in this community to be able to enjoy the natural beauty that our North Fork offers, we care about and protect our local habitats, and are mindful of the marine life that many of our local industries depend on for their livelihood. The additional traffic on our beaches will undoubtedly have a negative impact of all of the above. I implore you to reject the proposal of this project, completely above and beyond what Southold can endure. I am sure development on this scale will only invite more largescale corporate sponsors to destroy the beautiful community that all of us here are fighting to keep. Sincerely, Julia Earley To the town zoning board: September 6, 2021 1 am writing to VEHEMENTLY protest any approvals for the Enclave Hotel proposed for Southold. It is outrageous that the zoning board even entertains such a clearly inappropriate project. The very idea should have' e"�r� rejected at the outset. SEP 0 8 ?021 ,20NING f3QAf?D OF APPEALS The North Fork is ALREADY awash in severe traffic problems. Our bucolic environment is ALREADY under attack. Our beaches ALREADY require guards to keep outsiders from ruining them. The specious argument that it will help the economy is an. insult to the intelligence of every resident. Our economic situation is not under any threat. We live here and pay high taxes here for a very good reason. We want a QUALITY of life. We DO NOT want outside corporate interests telling us what for and determining how we live. The needs of the MANY must prevail over the greed of a FEW. I will be protesting with my fellow citizens at the hearing on October 14. DO NOT APPROVE THIS. You have already incited the wrath of this and adjacent towns by the very IDEA of approving such folly. �r ��` "� Mr and Mrs Jaynes D. RaIdrida g 6155 Hortons Lane, Southold r � Fuentes, Kim From: Lisa <Inr0206@gmail.com> RkEIVY D �II Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 12:21 PM To: Fuentes, Kim 11 Subject: [SPAM] -The Enclaves �ening�iaai�+i�`ofrr�'ppeal's, Good afternoon Kim I am a new resident of Town Harbor Lane ( Nov of 2020 ), but not a new resident of the North Fork. We have had a family house on the north shore for the past 60 years, and I am familiar with the North Fork since before it became a hot spot... I feel very grateful and fortunate that I was able to purchase my home for my adult children and their growing families -so they also may raise their children in the beauty and peace of this place. Imagine my surprise, worry, and horror to hear from my neighbor about Mr. Tibbett's ill conceived idea of a Hotel and event space literally on the corner. The joy of this neighborhood is watching the kids on their bikes, parents walking with babies in the carriage, runners, older people walking into town, safely, without the worry of shuttle buses up and down a residntial street to the beach, or endless traffic. ....The quiet of the night to be shattered by events. Why would anyone ever want to purchase a home in this area again? ? To say "no significant adverse traffic impact on or off site" is patently ridiculous. I can barely get out of town harbor lane now .. and the IGA and the Hardware store. I read the Impact statement with a large degree of puzzlement... The noise level? Shrubs? Glass barriers? My husband was a builder in NYC ...i know all about decibel levels... This has no place in this neighborhood. I am all for business and lovely dining, But this is so ill suited to this neighborhood; I am not sure how there could ever be a remote chance of approval. This is a family neighborhood ... small businesses, walk to town ... Please dont turn this into a commercial zone.. It serves no one but Mr Tibett. i signed an on line petition also. Thank you, Lisa Roselli i % 46 0 Fuentes, Kim ✓`D From: Karen Sauvigne <karenlee7a@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 10:24 PMr���l��� To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: Enclaves is way too much SEP � 2021 The Enclaves (a 40-room hotel, large restaurant and 250-person event space) is w fo Please do NOT approve the developers request fora Special Exception permit; There is no reason to grant it. Karen Sauvigne (brief by design) ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. i if RSCEMD Som /) Ili-71 SEP 0 9 2021 �� �_�X,a a}:M (,t j� �.ssiN.,J� _ _ �'�e'�� �, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS cuw. c!J �.�e�_ � �it,JR—��?1v�►' ,�'� 4 �Czs-�,�9. .R�tcs.�'��'�, „�; JV ter`------- ,+U .- Com - ,.�,� � 1 11�. 1e-, ✓y _ M.rM A � +I V co��Q d___ f-7 bR. �,-ems►- dv �; �� r-- ;if-�'� � s�� �—v�� z �s 2 � 6ss �" 10 /J,- i September 9, 2021 Ms. Leslie Kanes Weisman Chairperson and Department Head Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals � � 2021 �o�r 4 6611d 6f Appeals 54375 Route 25 _��-- Re: The Enclaves-Response to Final Environmental Impact Statement Dear MS. Weisman: I am a resident of the Founder's Landing Southold community. I have received the Town's final Env. Impact Statement (FEIS) regarding the proposed Enclaves Hotel, Restaurant, and Event Space. See my comments below: Traffic and parking will be greatly affected by this proposed site. The numbers they use for volume of traffic are not consistent with reality and this site development. This North Fork route 25 area is choked with traffic already. This 40 room hotel and additional event space will further choke this area in a manner that is simply not consistent with the charm and feel of this town we love. Now it is simply impossible to make a left turn onto the Main Road on a Saturday from the Founder's Landing area from either Harbor Lane, Cottage Lane, or Locust Lane...it can be a lengthy wait and often feel like a mad dash across when there is a split second before another car comes on Main street making the left impossible! We must not allow our town to become what has become of the South Fork. So many people have left that area to come to Southold to have a different feel. It is not all about the revenue to be generated by additional taxes. There comes a point where we must take a stand to preserve the quality of the town we have and not try and become like Greenport and all their activity and traffic! r- I , Special events has a way of growing and feeling uncontrolled and I fear that will occur. In no way do we want to have to police this and constantly issuing fines when things are getting larger in size than contracted. We have special events that have grown in number at the Founder's Landing Wharf House many Saturdays and we have cars that speed down Hobart to reach this area making our area feel less and less tranquil and unsafe. Please do not add to this congestion by adding this enormous project to an area already stressed by a 7 Eleven and events at the Founder's Landing Wharf. A town code is not likely to enforce as would be needed for this special events area. Besides volume, you will be adding noise to this area... I know that our beaches will be accessible to the patrons of this hotel by shuttle...Who will enforce the speed at which they travel down Hobart which already has too many people travelling too fast in an uncontrolled fashion. We have wonderful historic character in Southold and I would not reside anywhere else because we have maintained that. Please do not allow this project to go forth all in the name of additional taxes as it would be in direct conflict with the important goals as set forth by this town in the Southold Comprehensive Plan especially on page 58. 1 plead with the ZBA to make a sincere effort to limit the size and scope of this project and maintain as much of the character we all have loved here in Southold. Very truly yours, Leslie E Rich 1470 Hobart Road Southold, NY 11971 ,sa , ._ LVED September 7, 2g2_1 ©Hing Board of Appeals V To whom it may concern , My name &Nancy Baylis. I have been a tE dent ofSouthold for2S years. ,Ilive on Hobart Road in a 1928 Sears Craftsman home. Ilove my home, my netghborhooet My,community, and my town. I have had the joy of raUng two children in thi,bucolic environment. Every summer day we,spent endless hours at Founders Beach-swimming, catching hermit crabs, sun-bathing, and chatting with other beach goers who also lived in Southold Our neighborhood is the most ideal place to live and raise cz family. Recently, I have been very concerned about all the changes happening in Southold Town. Outsiders are coming in and buying up all the businesses with no regardfor local residents. The proposed Enclaves Hotel ' the most recent threat to our way of life in this beautiful town, It is our biggest nightmare! The businessmen involved in th& venture have little to no concerns for the residents, the environment, and our peaceful way of life. The main road cannot sustain the traffrcproblems that will be created by th&proposed hoteL rhe beach is notfor outside visitors who have no concern forproteamg the habitat of our beautiful seaside and the anzmaLs who live there, The people who live here year round have had to deal with crowded parking lots at Founders Beach, loud events and weddings at Mea " r strangers jet skiing close to the shore and crowded beacha.,-�t,'s notfarr to the residents who live here year round and who pay 9,0400 annual property tares. Acme have some consideration for those of us-who live, work, and love our town! Say NO AI to The Enclaves. The man or men -who want to build this monstrosity have no consideration for us, our way oflife, and our wonderful community. Sincerely, Nancy Baylis RECEIVE[) Owens 1800 Town Harbor Lane Southold, NY 11971 7-ming saaid Of AP Pais � C.PIRhE D. s�3 75 SEP �G4! i:'agaarcIat Appais; /aV _ 2 o-v Icl nJ-1' 6e- Impac-kd /fie "'X r e s r . r`v ra �� cs� roc 7 120 Korn Road Southold Town Board {RECEIVED — Southold, NY 11971 Main Road September 09,2021 Southold, NY 11971 SEP 9 2021 Re: Enclaves Project 2-fling Board of Appeals 1 /� Dear Southold Town Board, `�V I am not a born&raised "north Porker" but I have been a permanent full-time resident for 40 years. We moved here from western Suffolk County(North Babylon)for the quality of life we were looking for,to bring up our family in a small country village/town. People here care about each other and have a strong community spirit. My husband& I over the years have been happy to embrace this community spirit by volunteering as sports coach, PTA president&committees,church council&Sunday school. I count myself blessed to have been able to raise my four children here with this so important life lesson of caring&considering others. You can make all kinds of plans to ensure the hotel is not visible from Main Road,or simply put- hide it, but the impact of a 44 room,74 seat restaurant, 250 banquet hall&spa would have an immense impact on out community life.This type of business will generate a lot of traffic and use our natural resources. I am assuming that as nice as a resort hotel is,guests will want to go out to explore our area.We already have had an incredible increase of tourists over the years. During the summer I no longer go shopping in Greenport,go to the Greenport Maritime Festival,go to the Mattituck Strawberry Festival and any other events that draw huge"outside"crowds. I also only visit our own town beaches late in the day or after the summer season. I live in an area that goes down to a park district beach, Founder's Landing, and the increase in traffic would be devastating to our quiet community. Please do not approve the building of this "resort hotel".The impact on our quality of life is at stake. Sincerely, Terry A.Jensen V September 9, 2021 11f1�' Ms. Leslie Kanes Weisman RECEIVED Chairperson and Department Head Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals SEP 0 9 2021 54375 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Re:THE ENCLAVES—Response to Final Environmental Impact Statement Dear Ms. Weisman: I am resident of the Founder's Landing Community and have reviewed the Town's Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) regarding the proposed Enclaves Hotel, Restaurant, and Event Space and provide my comments below. Please note the following: TRAFFIC AND PARKING (pp 48, 50, 52, 55)—The FEIS concludes that "there will be minimal traffic impact due to construction and operation of the project," and goes on to estimate that this will result in "46 additional trips during Saturday peak hours and 91 additional vehicles during special events." I do not know how this calculus was derived, but,as someone who has just lived through what was doubtlessly the North Fork's most traffic-choked summer on record, I find it hard to believe that when a 40-room hotel is at full occupancy with every resident having a car, only one trip is made daily for each occupant. Surely people leave the grounds and come back on multiple occasions. You may also not be aware just how long it,currently takes to make a simple left turn on the Main Road on a summer Saturday morning from Founder's Landing—it's not uncommon to see three or four cars queued up at Town Harbor Lane, Cottage Lane or Locust Lane waiting up to five minutes. Clearly this additional influx of people, however it is calculated, will put us that much closer to Montauk Highway gridlock. As to Special Events, please keep in mind that because of the activities that go on regularly at the Founder's Landing Wharf House on Saturday evenings during the summertime, the neighborhood (and Main Road) is already far from tranquil. The Rotary Club proudly shared that they served over 1000 meals the night of July 31 at Lobsterfest, an event which brought with it traffic, several near-accidents and fenderbenders, not to mention noise and trash. Weddings at the Wharf House often have as many as 250 guests, very few of whom come from the immediate neighborhood. Bringing more congestion to the area (not to mention noise) will make it even harder for us to navigate our own community during summer hours. 250 PERSON SPECIAL EVENTS (pp. 2, 11, 14)—The FEIS informs us that "Large Events do not meet the definition of'Special Events' and are therefore not regulated by the Town Code." This presents a potential loophole which will give us no legal grounds for sanctions. Allowing The Enclaves to host an event which places no regulation on size and claiming it will have "no 1 / � nfl impact on adjacent or surrounding properties" is akin to inviting anarchy. One only has to look to the history of the now defunct Vineyard 48 to understand how crowds can get out of hand. Guests will have access to Park District Beaches . 69L—The FEIS claims that "The Enclaves is located within the Southold Park District and guests are permitted by rule to utilize Park facilities. For guests who wish to visit local parks and beaches, a Shuttle Van will be offered." Again, it is clear to me that no one on the ZBA has paid a visit to the beaches at Founder's Landing or Town Harbor Lane this past summer. If you had, you would have seen cars spilling i out onto the street, endless bits of trash on the ground which blow on to neighboring properties with the wind, and very little space to put down a blanket or an umbrella on the beach itself. This is not just a bi-product of part-time residents using their homes more frequently due to the pandemic—the Town has now allowed the sale of day passes to out-of- town visitors, who have taken full advantage of the offer. As a neighborhood resident who came to Founder's Landing precisely because of its beautiful beaches, I have had very little opportunity to enjoy them this past year due to the crowds. This is further compounded by the weekly events at the Wharf House, which happen after hours and turn the picnic areas into a parking lot throughout the summer. Shuttle vans are of little consolation. Our beaches are far too crowded as it is. Adherence to Southold Comprehensive Plan (pp. 27-29)—The FEIS claims that the proposed Enclaves venture "Promotes economic development that ensures an adequate tax base without compromising the unique character of the town." I think that the unique character of the Town, and (Founder's Landing within it) is already in danger of being compromised and that allowing for increased traffic, special events and additional people at our beaches will push it even further over the edge. In conclusion, I would like to remind you of one of the key goals of the Southold Comprehensive Plan, citing from p. 58—"to maintain and enhance our community's sense of place and our residential, rural, and historic character by encouraging small-scale community and residential development." The Enclaves project, as proposed is anything but a small-scale development. It will be largest development of its kind in the Hamlet of Southold. Small-scale developments do not have 40 rooms, their own restaurants, and event space for 250 people. They do not provide shuttle buses to neighborhood beaches. I strongly urge the ZBA to make a sincere effort to limit the size and scope of this project and keep the welfare of the Founder's Landing Community in mind. Very truly yours, Andrew Semons 1580 Hobart Road Southold, NY 11971 Fuentes, Kim From: Sally Kahn <sallyfrank@gmail.com> Sent: ThursdayS tember 9 2021 12, Sep .35 PM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: Zoning Board Of Appeals re Enclaves Hotel September 9, 2021 gEp0 ?ol eh�f�9 Board d rA i To Southold Zoning Board of Appeals From Sally Kahn Plans to erect a hotel and restaurant on MainRoad opposite Town Harbor Lane will overwhelm the community character of this area in Southold hamlet. In my capacity as representative to the Suffolk Democratic County Committee for this area, the eighth election district, I have walked these local streets many times along with my co leader Lynn Summers. Just off Main Road many local middle class homeowners have chosen to raise their children, to retire, to enjoy the ambience and benefits of living in a small town. A good many of these are full timers who have lived here many years. Walk the streets opposite the hotel site and you find Old Shipyard Lane, Cottage Place, Founders Path. On the shore a few blocks down is Founders Landing Park. Tourists from a 44/room hotel, potentially 88 plus, will perhaps stroll or jog the local neighborhood or visit Southold Bay. Cars for these rooms, the restaurant and the catering facilities will be back and forth along the Main Road. Perhaps on some days 185 cars plus those of 53 employees whose presence doesn't seem to appear in calculations for parking. This is too much for a small town. While I recognize the value of tourism in our local economy the community knows that we must seek to control tourism or we will be overwhelmed. I do not believe the hamlet of Southold welcomes the extravagant plans for an expensive hotel and its facilities in this area. In addition let us ask if these 53 jobs will be well paid employment for locals or just more minimum wage jobs without health insurance for the part time economy. You are being asked for a special exception use permit. There is nothing special for the residents of our Southold hamlet here. Sally Kahn North Bayview Road Southold Sallyfrank@gmail.com i Sent from my Wad ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 2 ---- Zoning 1 Go-— Zoning Board of Appeals j SEP 9 2021 Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Main Road oni,bb�btfld br Appeals Southold, NY 11971 Request for Special Exception Use Permit for Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant / `C To the ZBA: Thank you for your service to the Town of Southold and your careful considerations in respect to the future of our beautiful historic town. As a resident of the neighborhood adjacent to the proposed development (I live 3 doors down from the Main Road on Town Harbor Lane) I see no reason for the ZBA to grant this special exemption permit. I submitted comments to the DEIS two years ago and have read through the applicant's FEIS. I find it to be full of misinformation and misrepresentations about the impact the hotel, event space and restaurant will have on the community, as a whole, and my small, historic neighborhood in particular. I also reviewed the Town's Comprehensive Plan and the current zoning map and it seems this project would counteract the goals and plan set forth by our town's leadership. In reviewing the FEIS I wanted to share my comments to specific portions of the documents that are inaccurate or illogical. My comments are in italics - 250 Person Special Events (pages 2, 11, 14) "Large Events do not meet the definition of"Special Events" and therefore are not regulated by Town Code." "No significant adverse traffic impacts on or off-site will occur." "Large events in peak season will not impact the adjacent or surrounding properties." The above statements strain credulity and show a blatant disregard not only for the truth but also for any civic-mindedness of applicant. There already is a traffic problem for those in our neighborhood trying to make left-hand turn onto the Main Road, particularly during the summer season. 250 person events will cause gridlock and combined with the 7 Eleven traffic there is no doubt that accidents will increase significantly. Plus, these large events will not be regulated by Town Code—a sad statement that places the financial interests of the developer above that of the health and safety of the entire community. To claim that these events will "not impact"the neighborhood shows just how little time, thought or consideration was put into this application. 100 Person Small Events "More than one can occur on a Friday or Saturday, until 11 pm" These "small events", completely unregulated, will create traffic and noise in our neighborhood every weekend. With exhaust from delivery trucks, the attendant garbage, and waste disposal they will strain our natural resources at a time when our fragile environment is at a tipping point. Multiple small events on a weekend night will also cause significant roadway access issues and congestion, as mentioned in my above comment. Rooftop Terrace (pages 17, 20, 21) "For 50 guests, with 30 inch glass to mitigate sound, open weekends till 10." �� Since when does glass prevents noise from traveling, especially when it emanates from a rooftop location?Another reckless assault on their neighbors. Adheres to Southold Comprehensive Plan (pages 27, 28, 29) "Promotes economic development that ensures an adequate tax base without compromising the unique character of the town." i The Comprehensive Plan plainly states that "To maintain and enhance our community's sense of place and our residential, rural and historic character by encouraging small scale community and residential development."p 58 This is the largest development to be proposed in our town and will surely destroy the historic, small town character that its citizens have specifically sited as a goal to maintain. Also, the "economic development"argument is completely without merit as our town has more low-wage hospitality job openings than it has people to fill these positions. This has become incredibly obvious over the last year as nearly every store and restaurant on the North Fork has a help wanted sign in their window. i Traffic and Parking (pages 48, 50, 52, 55) "There will be minimal traffic impact due to construction and operation of project. There is no basis to conclude there will be an increase in traffic accidents in the vicinity of the project. Proposed project will generate 46 trips during Saturday peak hours. During Special Events, 91 vehicles will be exiting the site during Saturday peak hours." "In order to overcome potential issues, hiring traffic controls to guide safe movement to and from site." "Vehicles turning onto the property will be west of Town Harbor Lane and should not interfere with traffic making left turns on to the Main Road from Town Harbor Lane." "Hotel-based traffic will be new to the area, however restaurant-based traffic will depend on residents who live in the area, as it is unlikely that most patrons will travel long distance to the restaurant." The above statements are utter nonsense and an insult to any sentient person. The neighborhood won't hear or notice the construction of what must be tens of thousands of square feet of hospitality space? More car's won't increase traffic? People won't be driving to the restaurant? 1 am sure you will agree that these statements should be dismissed since they are not based in reality. Guests will have access to Park District Beaches (page 69) The Enclaves is located within the Southold Park District and are guests are permitted by rule, to utilize Park facilities. For guests who wish to visit local parks and beaches, a Shuttle Van will be offered." At high tide, the beaches are about 20 fe t wide and adding dozens of hotel guests will have major deleterious effects—the trash alone will present a health hazard to the bay. Children on Town Harbor still play in the street, as there is negligible traffic on our road. Shuttle vans, which could operate every 20 minutes on weekends, pose a hazard not I i I only to the children but also to the joggers, dog walkers and strollers that populate our street, as there are no sidewalks. The above items are just some of the more egregious claims. There are other troubling items, including sections concerning the "new 4-way intersection" that will be created by their driveway that will deposit all that new traffic (think delivery vans, trucks, limos, shuttle vans) directly opposite 7 Eleven. Or the 64 new low-wage jobs it will create for workers who do not currently exist, as there is no affordable housing. Please reject this request. It is of no benefit to the town of Southold. Thank you for your time, consideration and leadership on behalf of our town. Nancy Butkus 655 Town Harbor Lane Southold, NY 11971 Carolyn & Benjamin Bennett 155 Old Shipyard Lane, Southold NY 11971 Email: Caroleee(Ogmaii.com September 9, 2021 RECEIVED i Zoning Board of Appeals Office LZoning EP 10 2021 Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25E3oarof p eats PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 To Whom it May Concern, As a resident and owner in the Founders Landing neighborhood, I am writing to confirm my continued & strong opposition to the proposed Enclaves development. As I've previously stated, I want to reiterate that I am not opposed to development at 56655 Route 25, or elsewhere in Southold town. In fact, believe that responsible, proactive city planning could help alleviate many of the issues our town faces and would prevent the situation we now face in Southold with negative, unintended and unmitigated consequences from poor development. I'm furthermore quite outraged to find that almost TWO YEARS after having submitted comments and closely followed a public application,this latest round of responses in the Final Environmental Impact Statement(FEIS)was not shared with me or my neighbors and seems to have cropped up quite unexpectedly and without time to properly review and respond to the updated proposal. The management of this process overall would suggest negligence and poor community involvement from the developer. Indeed, as you see throughout the FEIS,the developers seem to have little regard for the very real concerns that have been outlined. Time and again and across topics,the developer states in response that they're doing the "bare minimum"while also asking for the required exception permit. In many instances,the response is a vague promise to do something of a qualitative nature although such commitments hold no weight, cannot be enforced and have no consequences if not kept. The town would be wholly foolish to give real and tangible value to this development, as is being requested. There are a multitude of specific concerns with the current FEIS,the most critical of which include: • The developer has come back with several ADDITIONS to a proposal that was already deemed too large in scale. These include a Rooftop Lounge, Guest Spa and indoor event space. • Another new addition is mention of a beach shuttle for guest patrons. To which beach are these guests being taken? Nearby Founders Landing is already flooded with beach guests as are nearby street ends.Are we to assume that the 88+ guests would also be frequenting our small outlets ? • The size is simply preposterous. The buildable area may fall within the land coverage allowances, but from a usage perspective it's quite an exception. Anyone can readily see that the scale of this would be totally out of keeping with the scale of our town. o The closest large commercial property of a similar nature is most likely the Soundview Inn. At The Soundview,they have 55 rooms and a large event indoor space for 200pp across approx 1400 feet of frontage on a large road. o Or take for instance The Warf House at Founders Landing. This small cottage has a capacity of 100pp indoors, 175 outdoors and regularly overwhelms our neighborhood with the volume of traffic and parking that is generated as a result. o In contrast,The Enclaves proposes 44 rooms AND 250pp indoor event space (in addition to a restaurant and other spaces) across less than 200ft of frontage on a small road,with an unregulated number of events capped at 99pp. • There is nothing in the report to address the unlimited and unregulated (indoor/outdoor) events of up to 100pp. Events of this size may not be "large" by town code, but far exceed what is typical and routine in our town and in and of themself will present huge changes to the sound, traffic, character, etc. • Traffic Impact is old and not fully considered. The FEIS responses to the traffic report are rote, bordering comical and leave much to be desired. That said, anyone who has even visited Southold Town knows that the increase in traffic in the years since the report was conducted has been SIGNIFICANT. The town has continued to grow and was already struggling with traffic before COVID brought even greater population increases. In addition to that,the developer himself has added a multitude of new and large businesses to the same frontage along the Main Road in the past two years -including Einstein Square, Southold Venue, Revitalized North Fork Table & Inn, and other property currently under development.Any valid traffic analysis should consider the current summer and fall traffic, accounting for the addition that should be expected for the combination of these new businesses,the state of Southold town. I implore the town to evaluate this proposal in light of the Southold Town Comprehensive Plan, adopted Feb 2020. In this plan we see that the proposed development stands in direct opposition to 6 of 10 town goals,while doing nothing to promote the others: 1. Improve traffic congestion and safety and ensure infrastructure supports the residents and businesses of the Town 2. Protect the character of the Town 3. Protect and enhance the natural resources and environment of the Town 4. Continue to preserve farmland and open space 5. Economic Prosperity("encouraging small scale community and residential development... withwithou compromising the unique character of the town") 6. Continue to provide quality parks and recreation opportunities in the Town. Southold Town and the ZBA are well positioned to be at the forefront of representing the community interests and implementing the town plan. In fact,the report itself begins by stating that Land Use & Zoning "sets the tone[...I and details the primary concerns of the Town's residents, including the desire to preserve as much farmland and open space as possible and the wish to retain its small-town feel, which can in large part be determined and maintained through land use patterns and zoning." There is nothing here to justify a special exception permit for the scale of 44 rooms. If The Enclaves wishes to develop a small boutique hotel, I'd welcome it and suggest we regulate the proposal in keeping with our town goals. However, as proposed there remain numerous and specific issues which have caused our community considerable concern, and new concerns emerging even from this recently updated proposal. Individually they each require a full and complete response, but taken collectively should make the denial of this application a clear decision for the board. Regards, Carolyn Bennett i Fuentes, Kim From: peninah neimark <pneimark@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 2:26 PM To: Fuentes, Kim �� �/r_[� Subject: objection to zoning variance for old Hedges b&b property o� � � Peninah and Harol Ne 'ar1C36o , d,-p'fr,� e 15 P.O. Box 1885 575 Hoey Lane Southold, NY 11971j�/ September 9, 2001 Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Annex 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Zoning Board of Appeals, We arewriting to vehemently oppose any change or variance in zoning for the former Hedges b& b property.The proposed project,which includes a 40-room hotel, a large restaurant, an outdoor, roof-top event space,and a possible indoor event space large enough for 250 people, is completely inappropriate for that location. It would create dangerous traffic congestion, be a noisy disturbance in a quiet neighborhood, and add to crowding on local beaches during the summer.This project would negatively impact the character of the village and especially the neighborhood where I live. During the high season, it is often extremely difficult to make a left turn onto Main Road from Town Harbor Lane (a street that we use daily).Any increase in traffic near the corner of Town Harbor Lane and Main Road would make left turns even more perilous. Main Road between Locust Lane and Town Harbor Lane is constantly busy with cars and trucks turning out from the 7-Eleven market that is right opposite the driveway of the proposed hotel and event space. Furthermore,to claim that the proposed large restaurant would not bring significant additional auto traffic is ridiculous. The town does not need to bring more people to local beaches. Because of Covid limitations,we have been unable to buy a guest beach car pass for our son and his family,who,for years, have lived in our house during the summer.Why should the town allow the transporting (via van) of large numbers of visitors to our beaches when we can't even get a pass for our son? Please vote no on the request for a zoning variance and take firm action to derail this project. Sincerely, Peninah Neimark Harold Neimark ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 1 i RESIDENTS OF MAIER PLACE c/o JAMES &FRANCES PERGAMO P.O. Box 429 - 515 Maier Place RECENE® Southold,NY 11971 (845)380-7743 or(845) 721-3895 SEP 10 2021 Email: fmp78@,optonline.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS September 8, 2021 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Dear Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals: On behalf of the residents of Maier Place(off Boisseau Avenue in Southold),we are writing to you with our concerns about the Enclaves and their request for a Special Exemption permit and look to be on the record with these concerns: • The traffic at the intersection of Route 25/1\4ain Road,Hobart Road and Boisseau Avenue is very treacherous, and crossing the Main Road or making a left without a traffic light is already impossible on the weekends. This past summer,the congestion of traffic east of the light on Youngs Avenue often backed up,well past the proposed site. To state the traffic will not be affected is an egregious claim. • The acreage behind the proposed development has always been zoned agricultural, and it has been farmland or open acreage for as long as I remember. (Our house was built in 1965). Our road is on the other side of that tract, and the noise and lighting from"large events"will most certainly impact nearby residents. The idea that such a project is a "small scale community and residential development"is ludicrous. • Allowing hundreds of non-residents to use the Southold Park district at Founders' Landing will absolutely ruin that beach. That is a fact. Our beautiful Park district beach and picnic area at Founders' Landing will be noisy, littered, crowded and unavailable to those who live here and pay taxes if this project is allowed to have free access. If the Enclaves would like a private beach,they should have to buy their own waterfront property and leave our Park and Town beaches to the residents and their visitors. These points are only the main points of impact that we would like the ZBA to consider before issuing a Special Exemption permit to the Enclaves. Residents of Southold Town have always enjoyed a wonderful quality of life for their tax dollars. There has to be a way to foster economic development without forfeiting the North Fork character in succhCa glrarng way. So many farms are being sold and developed, and once they are gone,they are gone forever. Once Founders' Landing is gone, it will only be a memory to those of us w o up swimming and picnicking there. SEP 10 �� y y ZONING BOARD OF AP' Thank you in adv ce for our thou ht consideratio ^'��� ' V ames&Frances P gamo Karlo&Anna Janketic Mary Fabian Elaine Mitchell Ed Pamic Danica Codan ,�c��oirr�lceh /D. boa,/ RECEIVED SEP fl 0 2021 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Ln cQ, J-,ka� .,ka cS ae, &Ixl�A lw� -,c� Ju okop ug�-� Wuo tam /n"oeo, awed uv/Luz. .e-t. 6LAxqtop ' /� .-� �e2 ,c.o.�,cz. irx-trze.. ,cam- ate Saak bock ,vry �U , .we ,cvW Rt-e- lW AuvAJ ANtua,P�zvrl ('-67YVY�.elQp -,ct�„'v�-x� qzz- `'J1')cvniu�., 0,1-kCt- .c�,�-Pn.P-, . c9qvebzr. -&6&2�� /00—tM cr �3/GL-�� , �✓1�cu,� .eia� o��� ,�t .�c.�.�` -�6-Qehc-oz,�a �rie�vv� — 1L�0o J�z C'C:�um,�upe�uoSo�2. Things of great rt-oncern with the Enclave Project: Not currently zoned for the project size Traffic Size of project Egress in and out of venue Hosting capacity 250 people indoors/ outdoors Roof top venue for 50 people Noise generated by hosting large and small events -(effect on residential areas) Water usage and waste disposal/ environmental impact Shuttle to local park district beaches ( I,' ,, New suffolk nightmare all over again) Planting of invasive plantings 65 projected Low wage jobs adding stress to an already existing issue.. Letters to be received to zoning by end of day Friday, September 10 Zoning hearing Thursday, October 16 r+ At s: 501 ,• v - ..t: L 4 .v.... ,,r., - ,,•v 1.a ..--. ::E `� r.. µ7 t _ l Olrr E 41.r a ��� k��� � �� ,� r. 'h; S .err" - "�, ka r.,,, • �„•-' >4 _ a a °I%`RAR .. F sljot0 Y ` dot aN • t r, '4iy „fr iBi vUl 4IOki AL � c 5 4 n z.fix :-r ,ur,: ,. `..�� �.+,y1`.. ,: .,� � ,. •.a,.. ' - + 'r,".""m �...7.iJ1C .. rrGi����,� -;�'� .,,,�' 'F-.�ii°� ��;"'+� •.i - .. JG" = ,PVqR -AS, KAN�S WElsriAN Cr/A►RVScN A?lb AfASSRS of t1.*. c oA!I RF E A-Rt . '1`D4� SEP 10 2n�� ��I� �LL �� . oninps��r�pApAeals J -r1*T t►/f PROPO%EN Pt AN FCR TSI E 'EAJGI-i1VES AND 46l TF#IFt IT Repflssr&qs IS AID IN CIA) f WITI4 &Wtj Cot4 *Afm *vt Ty /iS 17 S'rAJV DS 'roDAY, Td f I GjLLAV�T FOR oPosql , 6JFFE N STACKENt EAP AIoNCr sj DE ovAR CoA*C NsivsIVE, PLAAJ ;:%R TME ro%W QP 50%A.*T" ott�, 51 ^ ft Y Dohs NOT Roup U vtr' 'rd TtlosE 6CCAIRLY S STAN 'bAA,%�SI ACRO -S 19t L COAPMRS 1� CoNCEitNtiO ANp CI*A 1 TtEa COMM N N 1Ty Ms Leslie Kanes Weisman Chairperson & Members of the Zoning Board Please note that my family & I am an owner of multiple properties in Southold. I am appalled at the proposal for the above. This clearly is not in the best interests of the residents of Southold. The actual report is seriously flawed in so many ways I will not burden you all with listing them all. The Hamlet has a certain charm & lets make sure it stays that way. Vote Down the Enclaves. Peter S Treiber Sr , Irene Treiber Kelly Treiber Samantha Marra #EP 20 ofAppeals PECED SEP 10 2021 A tragedy in the making for our town ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS It is clear that the proposed Enclaves project would be an unmitigated disaster for Southold in terms of traffic, pollution, noise and environmental impact and would undermine the North Fork' s very special and unique character - a perfect example of "privatizing the benefit and socializing the loss" . If the Enclaves were to go through, Founders Landing would have two event venues within a half-mile of each other. Imagine the congestion and traffic hazards on Main Road, not to mention the noise on a weekend evening for those of us sandwiched in between venues, with, as the icing on the cake, hotel shuttles zipping through our peaceful neighborhood, disgorging hordes of guests onto our small, already overcrowded beaches. There is no doubt that local property values would also decline, perhaps considerably, as the fast-accumulating negatives became apparent to all. And what an interesting - and fortuitously truthful - choice of name! The Merriam-Webster definition of "enclave" is "a distinct territorial, cultural or social unit enclosed within or as if within foreign territory" . So much for fitting in! As a North Fork native, I urge you to please help preserve Southold and to vote against this monstrous project, which would sound the death knell for our town as we knew it. Thank you. TO: Members of the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals r PECEVE® FROM: Anne Murray, 3p0 Southern Boulevard East Marion, NY 11939 SEP 0 2011 DATE: September 10, 2021 "1 RE: Comments on FEIS for The Enclaves 'WNIIVG 46ARD OF APPEALS After carefully reviewing the FEIS I believe this project is not consistent with the town's Comprehensive Plan, which was adopted by the town board on September 8, 2020.The Southold plan states: "The Comprehensive plan provides the town board with a tool to support future zoning decisions and support current zoning when it is challenged." Indeed under New York State Town Law S272a, once an actual plan is adopted, however, all land use regulations must be in accordance with it. Once a comprehensive plan is adopted using the State zoning enabling statutes, all land use regulations of the community must be consistent with the comprehensive plan In the future, the plan must be consulted prior to adoption or amendment of any land use regulation. (Please refer to Microsoft Word -Zoning and the Comprehensive Plan.doc(ny.gov)) which notes: "New York requires that zoning be adopted in accordance with a well-considered or comprehensive plan.This requirement reflects both underlying constitutional considerations and a public policy that views zoning as a tool to plan for the future of communities. Over the years, the New York courts have defined the comprehensive plan to be the governing body's process of careful consideration and forethought, resulting in zoning that is calculated to serve the community's general welfare." Therefore, I believe the ZBA is required to decide whether this plan is consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan. The applicant argues that even though it was not required to consider the newly adopted comprehensive plan, "the proposed application is consistent with the economic development goals set forth in Chapter 7 of the updated Comprehensive Plan," and in addition, "the proposed action is fully compliant with the purpose, bulk and dimensional requirements for the HB zoning district, as well as the Special Exception Use Permit criteria set forth at§280-142 and §280143, and supplemental landscaping regulations set forth in Article XX of the Town Zoning Code." The applicant fails to note that the comprehensive plan's economic chapter clearly states that an important goal is to "promote economic development without compromising the unique character of the town." The ever-increasing loss of the unique character of the town was the reason citizens participated in the ten-year long process of developing the comprehensive plan. This project's intense use, combined with the increase in traffic and tourists, will forever change the unique character of the town Traffic: The applicant's claims that its traffic impact study, done in July 2018, reflected peak summer traffic conditions, and did not result in a significant increase in traffic. That study is now wholly inadequate given it is three years old and does not reflect current summer conditions due to the increase in population in the town due to Covid19. Special Exception for Hotel Use: /06 The applicant argues that it has "prepared a revised analysis of the project's consistency with the criteria for the issuance of a special exception use permit to address the project scope changes (i.e., elimination of outdoor events and mitigation measures" and concludes the project is consistent with all criteria for the issuance of said permit." This completely ignores that fact that Section 280-44 of the town code notes that says that hotels and motels "that will support and enhance the retail development and provide a focus for the hamlet area" can be allowed in the Hamlet Business District. You must consider that fact that this project will not enhance, it will detract from, and even harm, existing businesses by overwhelming the area with traffic and preventing customers from using nearby business because of gridlocked traffic. It will indeed be a focus and example of the harm that results from not considering this project's effect on the entire hamlet and indeed the town. The applicant seeks in effect to be rezoned by special exception to a Resort Residential use. But Resort Residential in 280-34 of the town code states that more intense development may occur only if it is "consistent with the density and character of surrounding lands." This project fails to meet that requirement. RECEIVED SEP 10 2021 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS V te, RECEJVED SEP I 2021 Zoning d0Y oY,� September 1 2021 pp als v �_ To Whom It May Concern; I own the house at 56815 Main Rd Southold NY. The house hase been in my family since the 70's and will continue to stay in the family/ I am writing this letter because I feel this hotel project would negatively effect my property and the quality,of,,_ -life if this project is approtred. I arra already dealing with. the neighbor- driving his farming equiptment up the private driveway and ripping it apart. With this new project We will not be able to enjoy sitting outside our property We will have to deal with strangers, noise, extra traffic, people coming onto my property. I think it will really effect our small town. When tourists come to places like these they tend to over drink and party and they mess up the area and the beaches and then they go home for the local people to deal with the mess. I am sure that when these guests come and ruin founders landing and all local attractons That the owners of the hotel will not reach into their pockets to foot the clean up bill. I think this is a horrible project and I hope that it doesn't get approved. Sincerely Dorothea geraci i • ,rs September 7, 2021 •�orrira� 13oai-c1 of,,�pp;�dIs Dear Ms. Weisman and Members of the Southold Town Z&—hiWBoard, lA 6 I am writing this letter in regard to The Enclave. I am saddened and disheartened that this project is still under consideration. Quite honestly, I figured that the Board, after receiving a multitude of letters and petition signatures in opposition of this undertaking, would have put it to rest. I am a retired Southold Elementary School teacher who has lived on Town Harbor Lane for twenty-five years. I love living in Southold,specifically,the Founders Landing neighborhood. It is truly a gem. However,in recent years,we°ve been wdiscovereT.`I dh the influx of Airbnbs and people taking over our tiny sliver of beach at the end of Town Harbor Lane, I fear that we're turning into the alternative Hamptons.There are days in mid-summer when you're taking your life in your hands trying to turn west out of any Founders neighborhood streets. The large trucks parked on either side of 7-11 completely obstruct any view of ongoing traffic. And now, you're considering a 40 room hotel, restaurant, and 250 person event space in the same vicinity? I read the FEIS report. What a complete joke. Glass to"mitigate sound...? On any given weekend from June through October, I can hear the bands from Founders Landing and the amplified groups from the coffee shop. By all means, let's add some music from the rooftop terrace. "Minimal traffic impact due to construction and operation"?Who are we kidding here? What happened to the town's commitment to maintaining our rural and historical character? There's nothing rural or historical about a sprawling event venue with limos, work trucks, food purveyors, and shuttles carrying guests to our already overcrowded beaches in the Founders neighborhood. Do we really need two event venues (Founders Landing and Enclave) within half a mile of each other?? This developer is NOT invested in our community. If he was, he would scale down this project and move it to an area that can accommodate the traffic, the noise,the partygoers, the parking spaces...and maybe even house the 64 new workers it expects to employ. What a complete nightmare. I strongly urge the Board to deny the Special Exception permit that is being requested. I assure you, the vast majority of our community is against this project. If you cave to the big money that's hell bent to cash in on our lovely town, they'll be no going back. Thank you in advance for your consideration. 4uccerel , ille Jones 925 Town Harbor Lane Southold, NY, 11971 Z O n 1 VI j Boa r � o f Town - qll NAyrr+eI yl��t S�-uI ;I d,r+9 SEP 1p20 21 enin O L4L+n 01 d ' 11 VVV mem (day-.5 o Flee z Stj 1 arum w i}�'r�y �o eX.press 9reofA o pPos, 1i or -♦�, -Fl,e E � cloves' re olue.st -Foy a She c;a l _ �xevvl � IlOn b�rrv�'i� . NOt Oh1Y iS �he I� s u L vvx FE 1 5 i vl a c c L-k -c e-e s +-ZD a h Omer-o u-5 +v ci4e in a lvr;e F •-1-1n c �,-�-�c �� i•1-s.e l-F i s n o+ ;n 1=e e P I,_, y w �`�� _ o Ur 5m a11 -A-own, toeaui":Fc coM r11 u VI i •� o f S o n i a 14- s A s-hr e s sin 9 +0 1 n Ic o ) e� / Spa ` 1 L-!5 co u I d be CL-1 1 owed as ,+ _w_o_t(.l � loc ctu NIaH i MAF—. TIS an L o Dov ail -��.e Ina- 1 w0Ylc yoU do Sih ce rely MecJ a n Fat r rove F Fuentes, Kim From: Peter Treiber <pstreiber@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 10:47 AM Q/1 To: Fuentes, Kim �! Subject: Fwd: Prevent the Enclaves ---------- Forwarded message--------- EP Y 02021 From: Peter Treiber<pstreiber@gmail.com> p �� Date: Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 10:45 AM '��©nj jg 8o r d Subject: Prevent the Enclaves To: <Kim.fuentesKim.fuentes@town.southold.nyus> Ms Leslie Kanes Weisman Chairperson & Members of the Zoning Board Please note that my family& I am an owner of multiple properties in Southold. I am appalled at the proposal for the above.This clearly is not in the best interests of the residents of Southold.The actual report is seriously flaw in so many ways I will not burden you all with listing them all.The Hamlet has a certain charm & lets make sure it stays that way. Vote Down the Enclaves. Peter S Treiber Sr Irene Treiber Kelly Treiber Samantha Marra ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 1 George. &L9nn Summers 1290 Oriole Dr. oo6oIJ1971 S � NY 1 631 298-8319 RECEIVED summers0optonline.net SEP Y 0 2021 September 10, 2021 ZON"VG BOAR® Zoning Board of Appeals °���p�A� Leslie Weisman, Chairperson 53095 Main Rd. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Re.: Enclave request for exceptions and final EIS. Dear Members of the Board of Appeals: The final EIS offer by applicant for the ENCLAVE project makes me wonder if any persons from the consultant team that drew it ever stood or drove on the street in front of the project at all during 2020 and 2021. the traffic studies used by the consultants are all too old and do not reflect the current situation. Route 25 alone, a two-lane rural road, cannot take more volume, especially if a significant number of the cars are making a left turn into this proposed facility. I have never seen "paid security" on a State highway, and I cannot help but think our own local police will not be called on to assist. Overcrowding this road changes the scenario for first responders (the fire house is just a short distance down the road) as well as local residents trying to make a quick trip to the 7- Eleven. The concept that locals will walk to the restaurant is ludicrous. We are talking here of a 40 room hotel, a large restaurant and a 250 person event space, plus 100 person small events on Fridays and Saturdays, with a "promise" to limit special events to ten per year. This can mean upwards of 150 cars coming and going during critical times of the day. Southold has precious little off-street parking even now.It means noise and garbage. It means loud music and road rage - things people who live in Southold and those who visit, wish to avoid. People will be driven from Southold by this venue, not attracted to it. We must balance the rights and needs of local tax paying residents with the desire of some people to bring in more tourists. Hicksville failed to do this, as well as Riverhead, and these, once rural areas, have become havens for cars going somewhere else, or shopping in big box stores.. We are not experts on water and sewage matters, but we are unconvinced by the final EIS that this venue, if successful, will not unfairly deplete our limited water supply and pollute our land further. We urgently request the Board reject the special exceptions requested of the applicant. Yours, F George & Lynn Summers RECEIVED Box 85 SEP 10 7021 Peconic, NY 11958 Sept. 8, 2021 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold C Southold, NY 11971 Dear Board members, My family and I are longtime residents of Southold. In all the years we have been enjoying our beautiful beaches, we have seen increasing usage with some parks seeming to reach their breaking point. How foolish we would be to permit The Enclaves resort to be opened in our town. Our already bursting beaches cannot accommodate their vans of guests to crowd our already overstretched facilities. For fifteen years I braved the traffic on the South Fork to work in Southampton. Each day when I would reach the North Fork I'd breathe a sigh of relief and gratitude. It certainly is not in the interest of our community to create more traffic problems for our residents and taxpayers. I urge you to do everything in your power to prevent the building of this massive hotel which would permanently change the character of our town. Sincerely, Isabelle Kanz and family Fuentes, Kim From: George Cork Maul <gcmaul@gmail.com> Y �� Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 10:04 AM Y p To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: The Enclaves Project IRECEIVED Dear Zoning Board Members, SEP 1 0 2021 -70019 80ard Of I would like to add my voice to many in opposition to the proposed A��Oa)S "The Enclaves" project in Southold.This project is not small scale development in keeping with t e s rotmclin area. I realize that the Town of Southold Comprehensive Plan is only a guide but it is time for us to start using that guide as the future unfolds. We all hope that the ZBA will refrain from zoning by variance and special exception as project after project descends upon us and destroys the character and culture of our communities. George Cork Maul ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 1 Zoning Board of Appeals / RKEWED Town Hall Annex Building ��u 54375 Main Road � 'SEP 10 2021 Southold, NY 11971 1I Request for Special Exception Use Permit for Enclaves Hotel and Resta rantNG BOARD OF APPEALS To the ZBA: Thank you for your service to the Town of Southold and your careful considerations in respect to the future of our beautiful historic town. As a resident of the neighborhood adjacent to the proposed development (I live 3 doors down from the Main Road on Town Harbor Lane) I see no reason for the ZBA to grant this special exemption permit. I submitted comments to the DEIS two years ago and have read through the applicant's FEIS. I find it to be full of misinformation and misrepresentations about the impact the hotel, event space and restaurant will have on the community, as a whole, and my small, historic neighborhood in particular. I also reviewed the Town's Comprehensive Plan and the current zoning map and it seems this project would counteract the goals and plan set forth by our town's leadership. In reviewing the FEIS I wanted to share my comments to specific portions of the documents that are inaccurate or illogical. My,comments are in italics - 250 Person Special Events (pages 2, 11, 14) "Large Events do not meet the definition of."Special Events" and therefore are not regulated by Town Code." "No significant adverse traffic impacts on or off-site will occur." "Large events in peak season will not impact the adjacent or surrounding properties." The above statements strain credulity and show a blatant disregard not only for the truth but also for any civic-mindedness of applicant. There already is a traffic problem for those in our neighborhood trying to make left-hand turn onto the Main Road, particularly during the summer season. 250 person events will cause gridlock and combined with the 7 Eleven traffic there is no doubt that accidents will increase significantly. Plus, these large events will not be regulated by Town Code—a sad statement that places the financial interests of the developer above that of the health and safety of the entire community. To claim that these events will "not impact"the neighborhood shows just how little time, thought or consideration was put into this application. 100 Person Small Events "More than one can occur on a Friday or Saturday, until 11 pm" These "small events", completely unregulated, will create traffic and noise in our neighborhood every weekend. With exhaust from delivery trucks, the attendant garbage, and waste disposal they will strain our natural resources at a time when our fragile environment is at a tipping point. Multiple small events on a weekend night will also cause significant roadway access issues and congestion, as mentioned in my above comment. Rooftop Terrace (pages 17, 20, 21) "For 50 guests, with 30 inch glass to mitigate sound, open weekends till 10." Since when does glass prevents noise from traveling, especially when it emanates from a rooftop location?Another reckless assault on their neighbors. Adheres to Southold Comprehensive Plan (pages 27, 28, 29) "Promotes economic development that ensures an adequate tax base without compromising the unique character of the town." The Comprehensive Plan plainly states that "To maintain and enhance our community's sense of place and our residential, rural and historic character by encouraging small scale community and residential development."p 58 This is the largest development to be proposed in our town and will surely destroy the historic, small town character that its citizens have specifically sited as a goal to maintain. Also, the "economic development"argument is completely without merit as our town has more low-wage hospitality job openings than it has people to fill these positions. This has become incredibly obvious over the last year as nearly every store and restaurant on the North Fork has a help wanted sign in their window. Traffic and Parking (pages 48, 50, 52, 55) "There will be minimal traffic impact due to construction and operation of project. There is no basis to conclude there will be an increase in traffic accidents in the vicinity of the project. Proposed project will generate 46 trips during Saturday peak hours. During Special Events, 91 vehicles will be exiting the site during Saturday peak hours." "In order to overcome potential issues, hiring traffic controls to guide safe movement to and from site." "Vehicles turning onto the property will be west of Town Harbor Lane and should not interfere with traffic making left turns on to the Main Road from Town Harbor Lane." "Hotel-based traffic will be new to the area, however restaurant-based traffic will depend on residents who live in the area, as it is unlikely that most patrons will travel long distance to the restaurant." The above statements are utter nonsense and an insult to any sentient person. The neighborhood won't hear or notice the construction of what must be tens of thousands of square feet of hospitality space? More cars won't increase traffic? People won't be driving to the restaurant? 1 am sure you will agree that these statements should be dismissed since they are not based in reality. Guests will have access to Park District Beaches (page 69) "The Enclaves is located within the Southold Park District and are guests are permitted by rule, to utilize Park facilities. For guests who wish to visit local parks and beaches, a Shuttle Van will be offered." At high tide, the beaches are about 20 feet wide and adding dozens of hotel guests will have major deleterious effects—the trash alone will present a health hazard to the bay. Children on Town Harbor still play in the street, as there is negligible traffic on our road. Shuttle vans, which could operate every 20 minutes on weekends, pose a hazard not only to the children but also to the joggers, dog walkers and strollers that populate our street, as there are no sidewalks. The above items are just some of the more egregious claims. There are other troubling items, including sections concerning the "new 4-way intersection" that will be created by their driveway that will deposit all that new traffic (think delivery vans, trucks, limos, shuttle vans) directly opposite 7 Eleven. Or the 64 new low-wage jobs it will create for workers who do not currently exist, as there is no affordable housing. Please reject this request. It is of no benefit to the town of Southold. Thank you for your time, consideration and leadership on behalf of our town. Nancy Butkus 655 Town Harbor Lane �+ Southold, IVY 11971 Fuentes, Kim From: Marilyn Marks <marilyn@shorecrestbedandbreakfast.com> Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 10:19 PM _ To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: The Enclaves development in Southold �� ��g�� SEP 10 2021 Please forward this message to those on the Board of Appeals who will be making a decision regarding the proposed ENCLAVES project in Southold village: Aping 8oarcl of A1ppeals I strongly object to granting any variances to the Enclave project and request that you do not allow it to go ahead or grant any Special Exemption permits. Southold is already a traffic nightmare most of the year and almost impassible in the summer all the time.The impact of this enormous project on our environment,way of life and quiet enjoyment of our surroundings and neighborhood is going to be drastic and entirely negative.There needs to be much more public discussion before allowing such a destructive impact on our village as the plan for this development would cause if allowed by you. It appears to go against both the spirit and the meaning of the Southold Town Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan plainly states the goal "To maintain and enhance our community's sense of place and our residential, rural and historic character by encouraging small scale community and residential development." p 58 This proposal can hardly be called 'small scale community and residential development'. It will loom over our village, disrupt our lives and the the only ones to gain will be the developers, at the cost of the current residents. Does the town need the tax income so badly, at such a cost? Do not grant them permission to do this to us. Marilyn Anne Marks Shorecrest BandB and Property Management 54300 County Road 48,Southold NY 11971 631765 1570 Marilyn@shorecrestbedandbreakfast.com Visit our websites: www.shorecrestbedandbreakfast.com www.shorecrestpm.com Visit us on Face Book http://www.facebook.com/ShorecrestBedandBreakfast?ref=hl ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. ti�.FIEXVE')- "Don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining" SEP 10 2021 ten., hoard o appeals (quoting the no-nonsense approach of the great Judge, Judy S e-is r There couldn't be a more apt description of how I, my neighbors, coworkers, and people I bump into in town feel about the proposal for The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant at the corner of Main Rd and Town Harbor Lane, running all the way down to the railroad tracks. The explanation given for allowing special circumstances for this property to be developed on that scale, is ludicrous. Many hardworking local folks maintaining all the lovely down home style Bed and Breakfasts, whom have all had to adhere to building with the same local flavor aesthetics, have all done so to a beautiful result. I think of these things as being one of the main reasons I left the South Fork and settled in this beautiful and bucolic jewel of Long Island. Which has maintained and governed the rate of over-expansion of large businesses, with great passion. Some of these residents who fought so hard to maintain the look and feel of Southold Town, some from families dating back to the 1600's.After many wonderful stories over a beer at one of the many local establishments, I really feel like I'm somehow a part of that family in spirit. This wonderful small business haven, and the quaint and picturesque village that welcomed them, will be ruined if this proposal goes through. I never have written a letter like this even to a newspaper, let alone Town officials, but I'm doing so out of desperation because I love ever inch of this land from Aquebogue to Orient Point. I feel like nobody is speaking for us! If there is please fight for us to keep the village and towns this great North Fork has,just the way they are. Wasn't there another proposal some years back over putting another supermarket on the North Fork, and that was turned down? A and now we have this?A 74 seat restaurant, plus a two-story hotel, plus 4 detaches cottages, plus an outdoor in-ground swimming pool, plus a patio with cabanas on the west side of the building, plus an indoor space capable of accommodating up to 250 people? I mean is that all? That's a lot more than a supermarket. I understand these proposals must be heard to be fair, but approved? For Main Rd right in the heart of town? I don't think anyone here wants this except the developers and whomever else would benefit from it's construction. How did everyone like the traffic this past summer? Can you imagine this? First the construction, and then when it would open? That's a nightmare double-header right there. Even the best lawyers in the world couldn't justify the environmental impact, or pretend the one submitted truly addresses every aspect of life that would be affected by this monstrosity, which, when compared to local establishments, is exactly what it would be. There are too many facets to the negative implications of this proposed project that nobody asked for. I know for sure that anyone who has spent a year, even a summer, in this wonderful place, want it to remain the same place that we know and love. � t i This Enclaves idea would ruin Southold. It will be the beginning of the end. The next developers will cry 'But you approved the Enclaves!" and the snowball just keeps getting bigger. Does anyone, I mean anyone who doesn't have some sort of connection to these developers want this? I'd love to hear why. Nobody I know or speak to in my many daily travels around this great place can think of one good reason. Most wonder how it got this far, but I realize there is a fairness to at least letting them present their case. Just do us all a favor. Just say NO! f„� Thank you for your time and trouble Sincerely, Bridget Meli Founders Landing Fuentes, Kim From: Mary Jane Brennan <maryjanebrennan@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 5:51 PM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: The Enclaves Project:A word from two nearby homeowners Attachments: Brennan:KaplanOpposeEnclaves.docx Dear Kim, My husband and I would like our voices heard on the proposed Enclaves Hotel & Spa project. Please see the attached letter. Could you include our letter for the record? Thank you. Kind regards, MJ Brennan RECETVR-D SEP 10 2021 ,�Oning 1oard of Appeals Mary Jane mobile 212.580.8089 maryjanebrennan@hotinati.com ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. i Fuentes, Kim From: Ann Sande <atsande@icloud.com> - Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 4:56 PM RECEIVED � To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: Southold Hotel { Zoning Board of Appeals Dear Ms. Fuentes, I am writing to express my opposition to the hotel planned in the village of Southold. This huge establishment is out of character for our town and will be a detriment to Southold. I am a full time resident and am quite distressed by this plan. Sincerely, '�W� Ann Sande no Sent from my Wad ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. RRECEIVED SEP 10 2021 ;Zpning Boars of,Appeals i I ' i ' SEP 9202, c 1�© o Iql r Fuentes, Kim From: Weisman, Leslie Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 2:09 PM To: Nancy Butkus; Fuentes, Kim; Duffy, Bill [, 6 Subject: RE: Enclaves FEIS SEP 13 2021 Dear Ms. Butkus ing �oarc�of appeals 1� This morning, prior to receiving your a mail, I instructed the ZBA staff to accept as part of the any written submissions received regarding the Enclaves Hotel on the noticed deadline date of September 10th. Anything received after the 10th is not legally admissible. Regarding your first inquiry about the Enclaves below, Open Meetings Law bars me and any other ZBA member from discussing any application before the Board unless it is in a noticed public meeting. However, I can ethically address some of your procedural inquiries below. All written comments summitted to our office or at a hearing are received by all Board members and the applicant, become a part of the application file, and are not generally read into the record at a hearing unless specifically requested to do so by the author of the submission, or unless the author appears at a hearing (in person or on zoom) and does so her or himself.The meeting on the 14th is a public hearing on the Enclaves Special Exception Permit application for the hotel use.The standards that the applicant must address and that the°Board must consider in rendering a decision can be found on the ZBA website under application forms General Special Exception Permit Application. Once a hearing is closed, the Board has 62 days in which to write and render a decision which must be discussed and voted on at either a Regular or Special Meeting. Both of those meetings are open to the public. However, no further testimony or written additional comments from the public may be received. At the earliest, the Board will deliberate on a decision at the next meeting after the close of the hearing which is two weeks later (the Board meets twice a month at a Regular Meeting, where public hearings take place and a Special Meeting where deliberations take place, usually on the first and third Thursdays of the month respectively. The agenda for both of these meetings are always posted on the Town's website in advance. Further questions can be addressed by the ZBA staff. Leslie Weisman Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 11:59 AM To: Weisman, Leslie Subject: Re: Enclaves FEIS Dear Chairperson Weisman, I downloaded the 58 letter and was upset to see that Lauren Barry, the house to the east of Enclaves, was missing. I inquired at the ZBA office and was told the deadline was 4pm Friday and she filed at 6. Her letter is one of the most technical about water and waste and must be included in the record.No one was aware of the 4pm deadline. One wonders how many other letters were not put in the public record? Thank you for any help you can provide. Nancy Butkus On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 12:01 PM Nancy Butkus <nancy.butkusna,gmail.com>wrote: Chairperson Weisman I am writing on behalf of my neighbors and other concerned citizens. Many of us sent the ZBA our objections to the DEIS 2 years ago and were under the mistaken impression that we would be notified when the FEIS was filed. Since the article appeared last week in the paper, we have been scrambling to get our responses out, 1 Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 11:59 AM To: Weisman, Leslie Subject: Re: Enclaves FEIS Dear Chairperson Weisman, I downloaded the 58 letter and was upset to see that Lauren Barry, the house to the east of Enclaves, was missing. I inquired at the ZBA office and was told the deadline was 4pm Friday and she filed at 6. Her letter is one of the most technical about water and waste and must be included in the record. No one was aware of the 4pm deadline. One wonders how many other letters were not put in the public record? Thank you for any help you can provide. Nancy Butkus IV-0 On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 12:01 PM Nancy Butkus <nancy.butkus9gmail com>wrote: Chairperson Weisman I am writing on behalf of my neighbors and other concerned citizens. Many of us sent the ZBA our objections to the DEIS 2 years ago and were under the mistaken impression that we would be notified when the FEIS was I fllPcl. Since the article appeared last week in the paper, we have been scrambling to get our responses out, despite the holiday weekend and short deadline. But none of us knows ex / there is much misinformation out there. Will our comments be read aloud actly how this process works and exactly is the purpose of that meetin d at the Oct 14 meeting and what that?Can that decision be appealed? Will a decision be made on granting the special exception permit after pP To what degree does the ZBA consider the comments of the community? Most of us are novices to this process and would like some clarity on how guidance or instructions on how we should proceed. this works. Thank you for any Nancy Butkus i i I i despite the holiday weekend and short deadline. But none of us knows exactly how finis process works and there is much misinformation out there. Will our comments be read aloud at the Oct 14 meeting and what exactly is the purpose of that meeting? Will a decision be made on granting the special exception permit after that? Can that decision be appealed?To what degree does the ZBA consider the comments of the community? Most of us are novices to this process and would like some clarity on how this works. Thank you for any guidance or instructions on how we should proceed. l Nancy Butkus SV 2 r Peninah and Harold Neimark P.O. Box 1885 575 Hoey Lane Southold, NY 11971 September 9, 2001 Zoning Bdard of Appeals - -- -- Town Hall Annex R �IsT�� 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 $EP 1 43 ��Southold, NY 11971 Uonhn9 f-3 ®f a�ppe�)s r, Dear Zoning Board of Appeals, We arewriting to vehemently oppose any change or variance in zoning for the former Hedges b& b property.The proposed project,which includes a 40-room hotel, a large restaurant, an outdoor, roof- top event space, and a possible indoor event space large enough for 250 people, is completely inappropriate for that location. It would create dangerous traffic congestion, be a noisy disturbance in a quiet neighborhood, and add to crowding on local beaches during the summer.This project would negatively impact the character of the village and especially the neighborhood where I live. During the high season, it is often extremely difficult to make a left turn onto Main Road from Town Harbor Lane (a street that we use daily). Any increase in traffic near the corner of Town Harbor Lane and Main Road would make left turns even more perilous. Main Road between Locust Lane and Town Harbor Lane is constantly busy with cars and trucks turning out from the 7-Eleven market that is right opposite the driveway of the proposed hotel and event space. Furthermore,to claim that the proposed large restaurant would not bring significant additional auto traffic is ridiculous. The town does not need to bring more people to local beaches. Because of Covid limitations,we have been unable to buy a guest beach car pass for our son and his family,who,for years, have lived in our house during the summer.Why should the town allow the transporting(via van) of large numbers of visitors to our beaches when we can't even get a pass for our son? Please vote no on the request for a zoning variance and take firm action to derail this project. Sincerely, Peninah Neimark _ Q /A, Xz,� —1 Harold Neimark Fuentes, Kim From: deborah wetzel <dwetze11103@outlook.com> Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2021 10:08 AM To: Fuentes, Kim tCi=raj ® Subject: The Enclaves project SEP 1 3 2021 Hi Kim. I want to submit my comments on this project. FzOnllnBoard ofAppeals 1 think it's way too big for Southold. Can we reduce the number of rooms? I just think it's going to change the quaint character of Southold in a negative way. thank you. Deborah Wetzel 917.562.7923 ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. i Fuentes, Kim From: Terry Walker <northforkterry@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2021 5:16 PM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: Enclaves Project This Prolect is an Outrage for the RESIDENTS of Southold Village.This projects Will Single Handedly DESTROY the72(6inSEP ED Quaint Village that we have.This Project is proposed by an Out-Of Town InvestmentFirm -(who also partners with local restaurant/hotel owners) U21Therefore It's Profits LEAVE the North Fork. While it will create jobs, many seasonal restaurants, & hotels Appealsare having an increasingly difficult time finding, & retaining employees. Therefore,they bring in illegal/undocumented &/or out of town/international workers with Temporary Work Visa's.--YES THEY DO !!!This further creates over-crowded housing issues,Forcing illegal working hours. Being paid cash wages &other unscrupulous wage issues. I know AND have seen this First Hand in the Hamptons. &this is NOT,what Southold needs.They have allowed this to happen ,for the sake of the money?? Southold Town is NOT For Sale to the highest bidder. Please Learn from this example, &just say NO!!! This Project will not only destroy beautiful Main Road, It will cause further Traffic problems, &destroy the Quiet that Southold village has always had.The North Fork residents should not be forced to accept this and well as expect any guest to pay in excess of$400 per night for a hotel., (including a 2PIusNight stay as a Minimum), There are many hotels west of the North Fork that can handle this demand if there is one,Some Residents also own 2nd homes as well as investment properties such as VRBO or AirBNB that count on this seasonal rentals as a source of income.This is infringing, &outright Blatant invasion on its residents Rights to Quality of Life here, that many generations have had & held. Just because someone thinks they have this idea, &the money to develop it,does not make it ok to develop this site,Soon all other Big box & Big Business follow suite, &the charm, & idea of the North Fork is Gone forever. We as residents have the right to Object to what is developed in our Township. The beautiful North Fork will Forever be changed -- I URGE you as Board Members, acting on behalf of the residents (who voted for you) & homeowners to VOTE NO on this project. Sincerely, Theresa Walker 4th Generation East End Resident 1 Fuentes, Kim From: Randy Wade <vision4me@me.com> L-5 Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 4:50 PM To: Fuentes, Kim 1g yD Cc: Leslie Weisman Forward Subject: Comments on FEIS The Enclaves Hotel & Restaurant SEFlo 1 -3 ),I Dear Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals: LZO)WIng Sbard of Apot-'als Please accept these comments on the FEIS for The Enclaves Hotel & Restaurant Proposal The Enclaves threatens to change the character of Southold dramatically.The FEIS does not acknowledge the current character of the hamlet. A hotel and large event space far exceeds the intensity of use for each of the other properties of the downtown in Southold. It would not be compatible with the mixed-use that combines residential and small business uses. Bed and breakfasts would be a more compatible form in the hamlet. One of the most undesirable aspects of the plan would be the extent to which hardscape covers the lot. A hotel should only be considered with the following restrictions: 1. Limit occupancy to 74 restaurant seats as proposed, 38 hotel units, 6 affordable units to house either on-site workers or replenish worker housing stock= 162 individuals staying or patronizing +workers could be extra 1. Maximum parking spots 70 spaces. 1. No flat space whether lawn or other ground cover that could be used by special permit for an event tent. Trees, shrubs, perennials, etc. would be acceptible with walking paths and small seating areas. It would add value for the owner, elevating the experience for hotel and restaurant guests. 1. No rooftop activity. 1. The buildings themselves should provide the buffer for any outdoor activity. If the developer refuses to limit the intensity of uses then the hotel should be rejected. Thank you for your careful consideration of this project. Randy Wade, Greenport ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. Fuentes, Kim From: Kika Schoenfeld <kikaschoenfeld@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 4:52 PM To: Fuentes, Kim WEIVED Cc: NANCY BUTKUS Subject: Enclave proposal SEP 13 Dear Ms. Fuentes, 0111119 Board of App0als The Enclave proposal will create an insupportable burden on the community's resources and destroy the quiet rural character of the town without benefitting the town in any way. It flies in the face of the stated goals of the Southold Comprehensive Plan and serves only to benefit it's investors. It must not be allowed a permit. Thank you, Kika Schoenfeld Peconic i ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 1 f , Fuentes, Kim From: Chris Aas <kcadventure@mac.com> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 4:55 PM Eurant CEIVED To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: Opposition to The Enclaves proposed hotel and rest 3 2�'2, Iard of Appeals ' Dear Zoning Board of Appeals, i I have read the Final Environmental Impact Statement for The Enclaves proposed hotel and restaurant. I oppose granting a special exception use permit, oppose construction, and oppose operation of said facility. My opinion is that the authors pay lip service to each comment received during the public comment period. Most proposed actions regarding comments are listed as "No change." This is both poor form and insulting to residents and responses like that should be an insult to the Zoning Board of Appeals. First, traffic in Southold will be negatively affected during construction, and during operation, because of the volume of vehicles, the narrow two-lane Main Road, the lack of signal lights, and the lack of pedestrian crosswalks. The special traffic study done for this site is inadequate and flawed since it can be shown that existing traffic without a new hotel and restaurant is already straining Main Road, and jams and backups are common. These traffic issues will not be remedied in the course of construction nor operation, and in fact are not considered to be issues by the authors of the FEIS. Because these are not considered to be issues, traffic problems will therefore will be ignored by the owners/operators during construction and operation, and Southold Town will not be able to fix these issues later. I suggest that Southold Town produce its own independent and separate traffic study, much like the study produced in Mattituck for there Love Lane area, in order to fully evaluate traffic flow for the proposed hotel and restaurant. Second, the proposed enclosed event room is a new consideration. This will accommodate up to one large special event of 250 people per week for a total of 52 events in the course of the year. Therefore, the proposed hotel and restaurant should no longer be designated as stated, but considered to be a proposal for an "event center" for upwards of 250 guests per weekend per week, and should be zoned as such. Southold Town will not be able to re-zone the facility from hotel and restaurant to an "event center," and not be able to enforce regulations if the zoning is incorrect. Third, private onsite sewage treatment,plants produce unpleasant odors, despite the best efforts of the operators. Southold Town will not be able to enforce operation of an odorless sewage treatment plant. Forth, the proposed beach usage by hotel guests, as well as use of vehicles to transport guests to the beaches, is unfair to residents. The small and intimate beaches are fundamentally the reason why Southold residents live in Southold. To put this in perspective, residents have clearly suffered during the pandemic when up-Islanders and city dwellers came out and stormed the beaches in years 2020 and 2021. Residents were clearly affected then, and will be affected if 250 additional hotel guests are discharged onto those same beaches each weekend after the proposed hotel and restaurant are operating. Southold Town will not be able to enforce future beach over-usage when the town has clearly been unable to control beach over-usage in the past. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these comments. Very Truly Yours, Christopher and Kathryn Aas 1370 Founders Path Southold NY 11971 631-765-2719 ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 2 /Yl\ Fuentes, Kim From: ROBERT DUNN <dunn3809@aol.com> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 5:42 PM kECEIVED i To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: Enclaves iRECEIVEb x, SEP 13 2021 ` zoning Board bfAppeals Hello Ms. Fuentes, Zoning Board of Appeals As the Southold website show no web add-r--e�s-ses-for Boat--d=M' mbers I assume all email goes thru you. This email will confirm my opposition to the granting of any of the requested relief from Zoning Codes proposed for the developers of the proposed Enclaves Hotel in Southold. While I understand they may have some rights under current code, their proposed Hotel seems to be outside the codes. I have read thru their FEIS, and find it to ill-considered given the Zoning and location of the project. To be specific I have outlined the following: A. They wish to have a meeting room for "special events" of almost 7000sq feet, you don't build out for "special events", they are "special" not planned for. B. They claim noise level will not be more then 5dba above current ambient sound, as normal conversation is 30/50dba, I find it hard to believe that can be maintained. Particularly when 200+ people arrive or leave at once. C. They applied for a roof deck and claim to use glass above the parapet to mitigate noise. Glass does not mitigate sound, it reflects and projects it. D. They mention using the second floor meeting rooms to be used to market themselves as a business and conference center during off season. A conference center will have a much larger impact on the surrounding community then the ebb and flow of a come and go hotel. The idea of large groups descending on, or leaving Southold at one time is not one the community can handle. Not being one to deny existing rights to anyone who has them, I do maintain that allowing such deviations as listed above, amongst others they propose, would cause inexcusable damage to ambience and character of downtown Southold. As such, it would be correct to summarily dismiss the application in its entirety. The Residents of Southold cannot hold back development simply because they prefer it elsewhere. Though they need not except when Developers seeks relief from Town code to their benefit, while having a negative impact on the Town itself. Thank you for your time. Respectfully, Robert Dunn Peconic. i i 1 Sent from my Wad ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. z Fuentes, Kim From: Lauren Barry <Ibarry@project-plant.com> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 6:15 PM To: Fuentes, Kim �2ECFZUFG Cc: Nancy Butkus SEP z02y Subject: Response letter to Enclaves HIS Attachments: BARRY-Enclaves DEIS letter Il.pdf ��t�ii�� �r�a��r A���als Hi Kim, My letter in response to the enclaves FEIS is attached. Myself and my neighbors only found out this document existed a few days ago. Our community has not had adequate time to review all the hundreds of pages and would like more time to respond. Can the deadline be extended for public submission of comments? LAUREN BARRY PRO1 ECT P L A N T 56755 Main Rd Southold, NY 11971 NOFO: 631.407.5348 www.prowect-plant.com IG: project plant Ibarry project-plant com 1 PROJECT PLANT S� Lauren E. Barry 56755 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 RECETVFd 10 September 2021 SEP 13 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals Office Town Hall Annex Building Zoning 13oard of Appeals 54375 Route 25 PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 To Whom it May Concern at the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Office, I live directly next door to the east of the proposed site of the enclaves. My front porch looks out onto one of the original houses my family(the L'Hommedieu's)first built here when they settled Southold.This town,and our founder's neighborhood, means something to me. I chose to put roots down here for a reason. I purchased my home a few years ago knowing there may be a small business next door to me at some point,but never would have I imagined a proposal for a huge hotel grossly out of proportions to it's surroundings.The proposed plans for the enclaves are a direct assault on myself and neighbors. By changing the zoning to allow for this hotel,and it's'events',it drastically changes the character of our town,the dynamic of our town, poses threats,to our local environment,introduces traffic,noise pollution. More personally, my property value will drop significantly and will personally bear the brunt of having a 'large event'in my backyard every weekend in summer and countless'small(100person)events throughout the year. I will not be able to turn out my driveway. I will hear cars throughout the day and night turning into and out of the site. I will be staring at the back of an eyesore of a fence. My gardens will be shaded out by their'hedge'. I will be constantly bombarded by the noises of mowers, blowers and machinery used to prune their hedges. I did not sign up for this.As I will describe further, I'm also now surrounded by Johnathan Tibbet's other'event spaces'.When will it be enough for him? I am concerned that Johnathan Tibbet's fast paced game of Southold Monopoly is getting out of control. Image attached. It is such a disappointment to see that one man's hasty vision is coming to fruition so quickly,literally erasing the history and charm our town is known for.Johnathan Tibbett now owns North Fork Table and Inn,the former Town and Country Real Estate,the 56995 Main Road residence and Huge Barn(which is an event space although he has denied this to my face—telling me it's just a space for him and his friends to hang out in), the residence just south of the railroad tracks off of Road B which now connects all of his properties east of Road B to the site of the Enclaves.Separating the Enclaves and his newly purchased Cacci or as they are calling'Southold Venue'(event space) is only the boatyard of which the owner has showed up on his behalf at all public hearing meetings in support of the project—so there will be no surprise when a connection is passed through there. In addition to these large connecting parcels we know he owns Einstein Square and the Shoals.There's not much left folks. Everything has been branded in decorator white with black trim and smooth gray granite,adorned with multiple sky high 'alien'sculptures. Is this the culture Johnathan Tibbet and Andrew Giambertone spoke of bringing to Southold Town in the public hearings? I literally stood in line at Southold General last week and watched a senior staff member(presumably the chef)berate,scream and cuss,at an employee who asked where the canoli's were.This toxic atmosphere will soon engulf our small hamlet.Where does this all fit into the Town's newly adopted comprehensive plans? 5 0 7 5 5 N A I N H 0 A D S 0 U T H 0 L D , N Y 1 1 9 7 1 W W W P D 0 J E C T - P L A N T C 0 M X110 Before diving into my comments related to the FEIS, I'd like to address how,we as neighbors were not aware of the document until a few days ago. It was only by chance,a neighbor happened to find out the document existed and that the submission deadline was fast approaching.The applicant had two years to respond to our comments.This project has been highly contested. I'd like to request an extension of public comments to allow for those,whether in opposition or for,to be able to respond.All of this is flying under the radar of concerned citizens and frankly it seems a bit unfair. I also have a lot of questions after skimming the documents and am wondering when/how they will be answered. BIGGEST QUESTION I have after reading through document was how after adding a 250 person event space did the water calculations/sanitary not change significantly?They're only accounting for 5gallons per day/per seat for the 250guests.Why is that they are using a higher number for the restaurant (10gallons per day/per seat).Are the 250 guests not eating or flushing the toilet?How is this accurate? Who fact checks this data for the town?I do plan to do some further investigations into their calculations and I hope that when I submit a revised letter, it does not fall on deaf ears. Some other key points I'd like to address from the FEIS are below: When speaking of aesthetics the document states that there will be no major visible changes to the building but states very clearly the changes that would be made to the landscape. "Accordingly,while the use of the property will change upon implementation of the proposed project,the visual character of the site will be minimally impacted." FALSE. By hedging and fencing,the site character will be drastically changed.Currently,my chickens run freely to be greeted by the children next door who live in the future `restaurant'.There is a shared view into the forested area behind my house enjoyed by all neighbors.The managed part of the landscape is rustic,yet cared for.Clearing the land,adding driveways and a massive parking lot, hedging with Leyland cypress(non-native,water intensive),will drastically change not only the aesthetic of the site but the entire character. It screams keep out, Not for neighbors.Cafe and spa for guests only.Stay away. In appendix I it states that"Upon implementation of the proposed action,it is expected that most hotel guests will frequent the hamlet center businesses,taking advantage of the hamlet's walkability and business offerings. It is expected that the proposed hotel will serve as a catalyst for existing businesses to extend evening operating hours and potentially encourage the development of new business in this part of Southold."It's no secret that Johnathan Tibbet newly owns a large majority of said businesses within walkable distance.This statement may be true, but it's self fulfilling.Johnathan Tibbet,not the community,will be the main profiteer. "Due to the anticipation such as weddings,birthday parties,etc on the subject property,additional parking over the required supply will be provided"—QUESTION:Where is this going? "Accordingly, no adverse noise impacts will occur from the hosting of events indoors on the subject property or from the overall operation of the proposed development".This statement is is impossible to achieve.Who prevents 250 people from going outside for fresh air,for smoke breaks at the wedding,the noise generated from traffic flow through site,the inevitable honking during traffic back ups when the wedding empties out or the buses are turning in. I can hear a car pull in with music at 7-eleven across the street. I will surely be able to hear the resulting noise from a 250 person wedding,a restaurant (presumably with outdoor seating),and a hotel with a rooftop lounge. Can the applicant clarify if the restaurant will have outdoor seating and where will it be located? Large events for up to 250 people—even the wineries don't cater to crowds that large for events.The proposed'enclosed event area'has giant doors and spills out onto a lawn/pond area—QUESTION:What is keeping guests from walking outside? Perhaps it's the mosquitos from the pond given there are no fish? PROJECT PLANT The pond creates an environmentally imbalanced landscape. Why introduce a man made water feature that will serve as a nutrient sink from lawn runoff,not have fish in it?Pump or no pump,the pond is going be full of mosquitos given there will be no fish. How is it even possible to keep fish out of a pond that large?Birds and aquatic mammals can have fish eggs attached to them (it's often why fish end up in isolated ponds).Why not ditch the pond idea or stock with native fish? A spa solely for the use of hotel guests is not inclusive to community. It also isn't considered in the sanitary flow for the site.This needs to be reevaluated.Anyone who has ever had a luxury spa service knows the water use involved is far more than a typical shower(scrubs,facials,wraps,specialty baths/soaks) A rooftop lounge is not fitting for the Southold hamlet character. My professional portfolio includes the design and construction of such spaces. I can say for certain that a"30"monolithic glass barrier" (waist height)is not going to reduce noise from a second story rooftop lounge and its resulting use. Many of the responses to comments claim "there will not be any adverse impacts" .This is used as a blanket statement when responding to noise/traffic,etc. but no explanations are provided.The applicant also frequently uses the defense—is better than the'as of right plan'.The as of right plan is so dated why is this even being considered at all? Document states signage is consistent with signage along main road. FALSE.Signage along main road is limited to hanging wooden signs.Architect's renderings show a large over scaled stone monument that looks like a large gravestone.This is not consistent with the hamlet's signage. The letter submitted by SCWA included In the FEIS in appendix K states: "SCWA recommends the use of smart irrigation control systems and drought tolerant plantings to promote conservation". Lawn and hedges,particularly newly installed lawn and large hedges take a tremendous amount of water to establish. Planting any large specimen like they are calling out for in their landscape plans, is not drought tolerant planting and requires a gross overuse of fresh water. I have reviewed the landscape plans which claim to be drought tolerant and so far only include lawn, hedges and trees all requiring ample water.There is only one type of drought tolerant species on the planting plan(juniper)which happens to be non-native.The proposed plan of lawn and hedges will require a significant amount of maintenance with heavy machinery(lawn mowing, hedge trimming,etc) and will be a source of ongoing noise and gas fumes from heavy machinery.The plan is stock full of privet -the cheap invasive species overused by landscapers to bound rich people in their properties, characteristic of most homes on the South Fork.There are many native alternatives to privet such as Aronia. Noting there are only 5 new species listed to be planted for an entire 5.65 acres,6 if you count 'lawn'.This landscape plan is a huge parking lot,a pond with no fish,and lots of lawn and generic mass plantings consistent with a Holiday Inn. The list of species included in the landscape plan is the following: - Leyland cypress(non-native, high water requirements for large species to get established, moderate water for established species) - Acer Rubrum October Glory—Native to low/wet areas; requires moderate to heavy water - Cornus Florida var. Rubra—Prefers moist soil. - Ligustrum ibolium(Privet)—Non-native, Highly Invasive.The amount of privet hedge proposed onsite will require a significant amount of pruning with machinery multiple times per year.The 6 6 7 6 6 V A I N N 0 A 0 3 0 V T N 0 L 0 , N Y 1 1 9 7 1 W W W . P N 0 J E C T - P L A N T C D M machinery required to do this will generate a substantial amount of extremely loud noise for long periods of time. -Juniperus Davurica'expansa'—Non-native(native to Japan). Large monocultures of plant massings as proposed foster the quick spread of pests and disease.I value my home garden and plant collection and would like not to be on the receiving end of that.I will also be shaded out of afternoon sun.There are so many native drought tolerant plants to chose from.The proposed landscape plan reads as a bland canvas of overused plants typically seen in front of strip malls. The landscape'design'is indicative of a client and a designer who don't care about maintaining sense of place and fostering a healthy ecology.The existing species that are predominant onsite,that are extremely valuable habitat and food sources for pollinators and wildlife are juniperus virginiana,prunus serotina(native cherry),as well as solidago(golden rod). I am including my first letter below as ALL of it still pertains,especially the environmental portions. My comments were addressed in the DEIS,but they lack appropriate science based arguments. I pointed out that the environmental data used to determine whether or not the site was ecologically valid should come from a local level.The applicant is only providing State-wide data saying the site, rich with trees now such as red cedar and black cherries(important native species), don't matter because those species are well accounted for at the state-wide level. I will point out again,that this data is skewed to represent the larger landmass of upstate NY,and is not representative to eastern Long Island.The applicant's response to my comment goes on to say that there are no studies done at the local level evaluating these types of ecological communities,which is simply a LIE.This information exists. John Tibbett's'Southold East' Monopoly showing connected Parcels.What is the master plan for all of these spaces? axhl � `v�ro�`V• _ � ��� .\ � �* \^fid M,<�Q. �. � ..�.w� \''"" els �� e "1•",• ��'F�,`, .�. ,�`W ,y,�, �,> 4�' 1�' ,�¢rS a✓ iC�y' �`F•^"�a� �a WKWNFVV�'N NY��T,�XY§'s W9+3'P'G�6P RS�Yi�hi/b PROJECT PLANT Below is the text from my first letter that still pertains to the current FEIS: I am the owner of the residence at 56755 Route 25,Southold NY 11971 located directly to the east of the proposed site of the Enclaves hotel and restaurant. For the record, I am not opposed to this site being responsibly developed for commercial purposes,but I am completely opposed to the site being built as per'The Enclaves'plans presented at the November 7,2019 Town hall meeting. My concerns about the proposed plans are described below. I believe the DEIS was conducted by the applicant using antiquated statistics and numbers that do not accurately represent the uses described in the proposed plans.The intensity of use on this parcel will have severe environmental impacts,and as I will argue further,introduces public health issues.Although this can be deduced from some of the calculations already in the DEIS,the extent of potential damage is not represented accurately. The applicant is proposing a plan that openly pollutes our land and water. It's frustrating to me that the Enclaves DEIS was not evaluated by elected or appointed officials who could have criticized this document,or fact checked better,before issuing for public review. It is my understanding that an outside consulting agency will be thoroughly evaluating the DEIS to aid the Zoning Board in their decision to approve/deny special use permit for hotel. I hope that the Zoning Board's consultants carefully quantitatively review the DEIS using appropriate figures and that the public's policing of these documents is highly regarded on the same level. I also hope that a modern day approach is taken by the consultants, that reflects climate change and sustainability and acknowledges the basic health and safety needs of our community. Proposed plans indicate 6.75 acres of early successional to be cleared with the exception of a few trees the applicant has deemed aesthetically pleasing. From the DEIS executive summary--'The loss of early successional communities would result in decreased habitat availability for the plants, birds,wildlife species present'.Agreed, FACT.The summary also goes on to say'the resulting habitat loss and any subsequent reductions in local abundance of bird or wildlife species is not a significant adverse environmental impact as:successional hardwood forests and successional old fields are classified by the New York natural heritage program as"demonstrably secure both in New York State and globally".This is poor science here.Taking an environmental statistic on a state-wide scale and applying it to a small local down-state condition is inappropriate. New York statewide Data is skewed. Data from the larger, disconnected,area mass of upstate,skews statewide data leaving local conditions(Le. Long Island) underrepresented when observed on that large of a scale.The environmental conditions of the project site need to be evaluated fairly at a local scale. The DEIS Executive summary also states'The successional forests and old fields present at the site are not known to provide habitat for any endangered,threatened,or rare wildlife or plant species.'The reason why there are no endangered,threatened or rare species onsite is because they don't exist anymore, most are extinct. Poor scientific reasoning,as described above,has been used to inform zoning processes for far too long and early successional communities have been allowed to be cleared,leaving not many plants and animals that live in these zones left to protect. By allowing the clearing of this specific site,we are not helping the situation.We must encourage the maturation and responsible management of these parcels of early successional forests in order to increase biodiversity in our local ecological community.As stated in the New York State Strategic Plan for State Forest Management(which to my awareness was not consulted for the purposes of the Enclaves DEIS),"early successional cover may continue to decrease as time progresses unless steps are taken to deliberately create,and enhance and sustain new habitat."This type of habitat is especially important for songbirds,turkey,grouse,deer,rabbits,fox and native bees to 5 0 7 5 5 M A I N N 0 A 0 S 0 U T N 0 L U , N Y 1 1 9 7 1 W W W P 9 0 J E C T - P L A N T . C 0 M h� "J name a few. The Southold aquifer is a limited aquifer that is currently being depleted faster than it can be naturally replenished and is facing problems of saltwater intrusion,subsidence,and contamination.This is a very sensitive time in the lifespan of the aquifer to validate withdrawing 2.5 million gallons of freshwater(as stated in the DEIS)directly from an onsite well to irrigate a proposed landscape that provides no ecological or functioning remediation value—a landscape of lawn and hedges built in attempts to please the eyes of hotel guests,does not deserve OUR limited supply of freshwater.What rights do they have to OUR water? Wastewater calculations are undervalued.Applicant should be requested to revise elements that are not calculated for such as swimming pool,hot tubs,laundry,and excess showering by pool/beach goers staying at hotel.When completed,the numbers for sanitary flow will increase and affect the wastewater treatment plan thus increasing the amount of treated effluent that gets pumped back into the Southold aquifer.Without the missing elements listed above,DEIS states that approximately 3.2 million gallons of treated effluent will be sent to the leaching pools and recharged back into the aquifer.Treated effluent contains nitrogen, harmful bacteria and microorganisms as well as endocrine disrupting pharmaceuticals such as caffeine and synthetic hormones.This is another potential public health issue that would be introduced by proposed plans. Regarding waste management,where do they intend to take the biosolids from the sewage treatment plant to? I am also curious what the impact will be on the Southold landfill in regards to the disposal of biosolids, if that's where they will be brought,as well as trash generated from the restaurant and hotel. Stormwater Runoff calculations are severely underrepresented. Using a 2"rainfall for stormwater calculations is no longer seen in the profession of architecture or landscape architecture as adequate.The applicant should be calculating for rainfall events consistent with climate change standards regardless of whether Southold town code is up to date on this. Impervious surfaces in proposed plan increase from 0.1 acres existing to 2.99+acres resulting in 44.3%of site being impervious.That's nearly 3 full acres of non-permeable surfaces including paved access ways, parking spaces and built structures.Green building measures should be used and could include permeable paving and greenroof areas to enhance stormwater management practices onsite. The proposed buildings are bullying to surrounding structures and do not fit local context or represent Southold character.The applicant claims the structure of the newly built hotel will not be able to be seen from the road.The elevation of the pitched roof suggests otherwise.The proposed landscape buffer/hedge is also not adequate enough to block this huge structure. On a personal level,my quality of life will be severely negatively impacted both during construction and when the hotel is up and running. Dust generated during construction will pose health and safety issues. The top two inches of soil contain pesticides,arsenic,mercury and possibly other metals such as lead.One environmental technician to effectively monitor and potentially hose down a 6.75 acre site is not an adequate mitigation measure and is not humanly impossible given the scale of the site.This is a public health issue.Applicant is putting my household at risk.This is my land I grow my food own.There will undoubtedly be contaminated dust on surfaces of vegetables,contaminated dust migrating and settling into my soil,and contaminated dust in the air I breathe.What consequences does the applicant bear when I become sick? DEIS States 46 cars per hour are expected entering the site,only several feet from my living room,on a typical Saturday morning.That driveway will see more cars than most residential streets in Southold. For an event such as a wedding,where all 160 parking spots onsite are filled at the same time,not only will there be a traffic jam on the main road,there will be a slow migration of bumper to bumper vehicles next PROJECT PLANT to me as I try to enjoy dinner at my kitchen table. Delivery trucks will be entering before and after events to set up and break down.This happens during early morning and late night hours. I am already woken by delivery trucks pulling in and out of 7-Eleven. Now I will be woken by delivery trucks pulling into the Enclaves.Why should I personally bear the burden of noise,dust,exhaust,and headlights of cars and delivery trucks servicing hotel guests?I do not see any mitigation measures in the DEIS related to such pollution caused by vehicles entering the site.The location of the proposed entry access way turns my property into a corner lot of a busy intersection. I encourage the applicant to relocate the driveway and parking to the west side of the restaurant only so that I don't personally suffer. DEIS states outdoor events for up to 250 people using 160 parking spots.What if each car does not have 2 or more people in it.That could be up to 125 more cars or more.Where do they park?Along the main road in front of my house in my garden?What is the overflow parking plan? DEIS noise control mitigation measures are inadequate. I hear my neighbors whispering in their driveway. Nothing they have proposed,including temporary noise barriers,will effectively block music and voices from disrupting me.The event/wedding space is literally in my backyard. How am I supposed to maintain quality of life when there will be a large party happening every weekend? I noticed the event space being discussed by the applicant as a meadow.In order to pitch a tent and have a solid flat floor,they will have to mow their meadow.A mowed meadow is a fancy term for LAWN.With their extensive hosting of events occurring in peak meadow growth time(spring/summer/fall),there will never be a meadow. I am extremely concerned that vegetative buffer will not prevent opportunistic wedding guests after a few drinks from walking straight into my yard.There needs to be a stronger protective solution put in place between their outdoor event space and my yard.Who is liable when a drunk wedding guest trespasses and falls in my yard?Is it me or is it John Tibbet and Andrew Giambertone? Handing over a special exemption permit will set a precedent for the future of Southold. Is this the example Southold Town Zoning Board wants to set?How did this plan that is in disregard for our community even get this far?A growing concern of mine is Mr.Tibbett's expanding real estate purchases along main road . I'd like to know how the site of the Enclaves will play in to the parcel located at 56995 Main Rd Southold where a large barn is being erected,as well as the property of North Fork Table and Inn. It should not be permissible for a singular hasty vision to shape OUR town. If the programming for these parcels relate to each other,consideration should be paid to that NOW.The community should be made informed.We,the locals,want more transparency. Regards, Lauren E. Barry Ibarry@project-plant.com 347-452-3215 5 0 7 5 5 M A I N D 0 A D S 0 D T H 0 L D , N Y 1 1 0 7 1 W W W . P 0 0 J E O T - P L A N T C D M yet Fuentes, Kim From: Nancy Butkus <nancy.butkus@gmail.com> ✓l (� V Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 6:34 PM To: Kika Schoenfeld Cc: Fuentes, Kim pi�Ea�VEl� Subject: Re: Enclave proposal SEP 1 3 2021 Nice! FJZ0thling Board of Appeals On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 4:51 PM Kika Schoenfeld <kikaschoenfeld@gmail.com>wrote: Dear Ms. Fuentes, The Enclave proposal will create an insupportable burden on the community's resources and destroy the quiet rural character of the town without benefitting the town in any way. It flies in the face of the stated goals of the Southold Comprehensive Plan and serves only to benefit it's investors. It must not be allowed a permit. i Thank you, Kika Schoenfeld Peconic 3 1 Fuentes, Kim 1 From: joni friedman <pedrogft@yahoo.com> ��(�V Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 11:55 PM To: Fuentes, Kim RECEIVED Subject: The Enclaves Project SEP 13 2021 To Whom this May Concern, Oning Board OfAppeals This is to voice my concern for the adverse impact and destruction of the peaceful landscape that the "Enc aves" project has already had on our community of Southold.One man,Johnathan Tibbet has amassed a huge swath of land and already developed properties. These properties include single family homes as well as a small inn and restaurant.With utter disregard and a lack of respect for the fragility of our aquifer and the delicate balance of natural ecosystems, Mr.Tibbet has not only proposed a devastating environmental assault to the North Fork with his 45 room hotel, swimming pool, pond,event spaces, rooftop lounge,spa, parking lot, etc., he has disregarded the wishes, quality of life and livelihoods of the people of our town. His behavior and "everything and everyone has their price" attitude is horrifying. He has already raped acres of forested land,felling all trees without regard for the wildlife that inhabited it nor the privacy or air quality for the surrounding neighbors.Already,the character of the neighborhood has changed with tall imposing walls of fencing. Stop this now! Joni Friedman New Suffolk 0 ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. OCT 0 4 2029 zoning boai-d of Appeals October 1,2021FREM11-Ell Town of Southold ; Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals ! a 54375 Main Road 1Ig-EWagt',1 P.O.Box 1179 1= Southold,New York 11971 Re; Application for a Special Exception Use Permit(the"Application") to the Town of Southold(the"Town")Zoning Board of Appeals,("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa ("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (tile "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: "e] currently [own/ cu j the property located at Southold, New York 11971, e]understand that th�icant will be presenting the A�ication before the ZBA on October 14,20 ,requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Pioject and[1/we] support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered,responsible development that is needed in the'Town's business district. We]have reviewed(i)the Draft Environmental Impact Statement("DEIS"),prepared by P.W. (.'cross Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Envirotunental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii) the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan("Compreher►siv 'lan"),adopted in,November 2020 and (iv) the August 19, 2021 ZRA Resolution accepting the FEIS.(,)we]concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS'and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further,the FEIS analyzed,urgreat detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. "Therefore,as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, Clave] support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. &,Ale]respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours, [Name] 2J [Address] 1d 1 4 P21 I l 1 i l /On1ng1,3o6reJ•6V 01peals',, C October 1,2021 Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit(the"Application")to the Town of,Southold(the"Town")Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant")in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: I currently Own the property located at 275 Boisseau Ave, Southold, New York 11971. 1 understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14, 2021, requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and [I/we] support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed`in the Town's business district. I have reviewed (i) the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS"), prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 (`•`FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix l (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and (iv) the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. I concur with the ZBA,'s adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. -Further, the FEIS analyzed, in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been,reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, I support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. I respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours, V� y October 1,2021 Town of Southold - Chairperson Weisman and the Members ofthe Zoning Board of Appeals ;RCTVEb 54375 Main Road i P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Bbatdd 0%A eels, Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit(the"Application")to the Town p of Southold(the"Town")Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA')by 56655 Maio LLC("Applicant")in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project")at the property located at 56655 Main Road,Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C.Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15(the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: We currently own the property located at 4200 Soundview Ave,Southold,New York 11971.We understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on the October 14,2021,requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and we support the Project and ask that it be granted.The Project is a carefully considered,responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. We have reviewed(i)the Draft Environmental Impact Statement("DEIS"N prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting,Inc.("PW"),dated April 2019,and last revised October 2019,(ii)the Final Environmental hnpad Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1(iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan("Comprehensive Plan"),adopted in November 2020 and(iv)the August 19,2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS.We concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan.Further,the FEIS analyzed,in great details, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code.Therefore,as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS,we support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. We respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard Very truly y Jessie&Scott Bennett 4200 Soundview Ave,Southold NY 11971 - Scanned with CarnSCanner r � - l October 1, 20[7—OWM I� ' Town of Southold Z®21ov Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appealsp,� ea1S54375 Main Road oaYd P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit (the "Application") to the Town of Southold(the"Town")Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: I currently own the property located at 235 dolphin Dr Southold, New York 11971. I understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14, 2021, requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and [I/we] support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. I have reviewed (i) the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS"), prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement, prepared by PW, dated April 2020, and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"),including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and (iv) the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. I concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further, the FEIS analyzed, in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, I support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. I respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours, 91�--47 7�&&7 Jamey Tibett 235 Dolphin DR Southold,NY 11971 f i' THE OREENPORT RE ING COMPANY, LLC 42155 MAIN ROAD, PECONIC, NY 11958 631-477-1100 Rich@GreenportBrew.com RICH VANDENBURGH JOHN LIEGEY Founder Founder Vice President&Board Member of NYSBA October 4,2021 r Town of Southold IV Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road / e1P P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 ��t �Badl`�,pF�q 'Peas" Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit (the "Application") to the Town-,of Southold (the "Town") Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa ("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C.Tax Map IdentificatiorrNo.: 1000-63-3-15 (the"Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: 1 am a Southold Town Resident of 33 years and also a co-owner,of Greenport Harbor Brewing Company located at 234 Carpenter Street in Greenport and at 42155 Main Road in Southold. I am aware and understand that the Applicant is seeking approval of a Special Exception Use Permit for this project and will be presenting the above referenced Application before the ZBA on October 14, 2021. I support the Enclaves Project and ask that this application be granted. The,Project is a carefully considered,responsible development that is not only needed but would also be be, within the Town of Southold. I am aware of the (i) the Draft Environmental Impact Statements ("DEIS"), prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW") dated April 20,19, and revised October 2019, (ii), the Final Environmental Impact Statement, prepared by PW, dated April 2020, and revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii) the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and(iv)the August 19,2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. I also agree with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. I believe the FEIS analyzed, in great detail,how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Penriit-and'this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS,I support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. Therefore,l respectfully request.that this Letter of Support included in the Town's file for this matter. V truly y r , CHARD VANDENBURGH Fuentes, Kim From: Glenn Heidtmann <glenn@gfhbuild.com> Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 8:32 PM C To: Fuentes, Kim � D Subject:, 56655 Main Road LLC ZBA Application E Attachments: drawing.png;ATT00001.txtOctober 4,2021 ApPeals Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit (the "Application") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa ("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: I currently own property located at 600 Albacore Drive, Southold, New York 11971. 1 understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 141 2021, requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and I support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. I have reviewed (i) the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS"), prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement, prepared by PW, dated April 2020, and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii) the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and (iv) the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. I concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further, the FEIS analyzed, in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, I support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. I respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours, RECEIVED Glenn F Heidtmann jr OCT 0 5 2021 600 Albacore Drive, Southold, Ny 11971 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 2 October 2, 2021 ��� OCT 0 5 2021 Town of Southold ®�j� �nal°c�p� Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals -� Ippeals 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit (the "Application") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: I currently own the property located at 4775 Paradise Point, Southold,New York 11971. I understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14, 2021,requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and [Uwe] support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered,responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. I have reviewed(i)the Draft Environmental Impact Statement("DEIS"),prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting,Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii)the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW, dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and (iv) the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. I concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further, the FEIS analyzed, in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, I support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. I respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours, Alison Deans 4775 Paradise Point Road Southold,NY 11971 October 4,2021 Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road �a15 P.O. Box 1179 �a 6� Abp Southold,New York 11971 Re:, Application for a Special Exception Use Permit(the "Application") to the Town of Southold(the"Town")Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project")at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3=15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: I, Kenneth Homan, President of Braun Seafood Company, currently own the property located at 30840 Main Road, Cutchogue,New York 11935. I understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14, 2021, requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and I support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. I have reviewed (i) the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS"), prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and (iv)the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. I concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further, the FEIS analyzed, in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, I support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. I respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. R Very truly yours, Kenneth J. Homan President Braun Seafood Company lJ LLE N MOTOR,SNC a,ff2"Yrss lL E 9Z Jeep MOPRR. �3AlW October 1,2021 I PFC61V�D "Town-of Southold OCT 0 5 Chairperson Weisman.and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals ���1 ' 54375 Main Road 17: � �if� oPd; P.O; Box 117.9 - i3�,��p��is', Southold,New York 11971 --__--1-) Re: Application fora Special Exception Use Permit(the"Application")to the Town of Southold (the"Town")Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA")by 56,655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project")at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold,Naw York 11;971 a/k/a S.C.Tax Map Identification No., 1000-63-3-15 (the"Property'',}. Dear Chairperson Weisman: We currently own ,the property located at 55980 Route 25, Southold, New York 11971. -We understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14, 2021, requesting a Special Exception Use-Termit to develop the Project and [1/eve] support the'Project and ask that it be granted. The Project-is a carefully considered, responsible development that'is needed in the Town's business district. Vire have-reviewed (i) the Draft Environmental lmpact Statement (`'DF,1S"), prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement, prepared by PW,dated April 2020,•and last revised July 2021 ("PEAS°'), including the Special Exception Use Permit..Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020'and (iv) the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting,the FEIS.,We concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believerthat the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further, the HIS analyzed, in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code; Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special, Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, we support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. We respectfully request,that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's,file for this.matt&. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very`truly yours, Richard F.Mullen III Wiltialn H.Mullen 55980 Route 25 55980 Route,25 Southold,NY 11-971, Southold,NY I-1971 P.O. Box 1408 • 55880 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 • Telephone: 63.1-7B5-3564 • Fax: ,631-765-3926 www.mullen motors.com OCT 0 5 2021 0ctoher 1. 2021 8v^.aZ)OF Town of io L� c. C hairpern�on \1 c;sivan arld The N1cinbei s of the Zonrnu Board of Appeals Ro. Bo,\ 1 1`9 S0uth.1l;3, A`cu' l.ork 1 1971 he_ Application for a Special Exception Use Permit(the "Application") to the Town of Southold(the"ToxA n")Zoning Board of'Appeals("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC{-Applicant-) in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa ("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New Fork 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Propert),-''). I gear Chairperson Weisman: R'VV'ej currently [oAvnloccupy] the property located at � !W40southold, New York i 11.971.(1 Wel understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October ' 14. 2021. requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and [I/we] support the Project and ask that it be granted, The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town`s business district. (i,'VVe] have reviewed (i) the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DElS"), prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW, dated April 2020, and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii) the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive PIan ("Comprehensive Plan"'), adopted in November 2020 and (iv) the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. [Utk e] concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further,the FEIS analyzed,in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit i and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS,[I/We] support Oe issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. f l/Wej respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. i Thank you for your attention in this regard. i 1 Ver � Y truly Yours, a [Nance] [Address] } 3 i i //Aae 0 tr�� October 1, 2021?�� �� � Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals =- 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit (the "Application") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold,New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the"Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: I,John Fraser currently own the property located at 580 Willow Point Road, Southold,New York 11971. 1 understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14, 2021, requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and I support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. I have reviewed (i) the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS"), prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement, prepared by PW, dated April 2020, and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii) the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and (iv) the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. I concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further, the FEIS analyzed, in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, I support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. I respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours, John Fraser 580 Willow Point Road, Southold,NY 11971 October 1,2021 Town of Southold �d o Rpped�� Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road ��� P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application fora Special Exception Use Permit(the "Application„)to the Town of Southold(the"Town„)Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA„)by 56655 Main Road LLC("Applicant„)in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project„) at the property located at 56655'Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property,,). Dear Chairperson Weisman: II [I/Wc currently (own/occupy & the property located at MZSouthold, New York 11971. [I/We I understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14,2021,requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and[Uwe]support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. F/We]have reviewed(i)the Draft-Environmental Impact Statement("DEIS,,),prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW„), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,,prepared by PW,datedApril 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS„), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1-(iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan,,), adopted in November 2020 and(iv)the August 19,2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. [I/we[concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further,the FEIS analyzed,in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, [UWG I support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. [I/We I respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yory [Name] Ftr4te/k t9vN-fXffM [Address] 6�s My ffeyel- 4olfv .S'(9 q rye t D .All,//I?I iu 4ss October 1,2021 , 'PZE C EEI VE b Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road of AoOea�-Ji oning Board ,I P.O.Box 1179 J Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit(the"Application,,) to the Town of Southold(the"Town,,)Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA,,)by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant„) in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project„)at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property„). Dear Chairperson Weisman: [I/We'] currently lown/oecupyl the property located at &-6 Southold, New York 11971. 1 I/We]understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14,2021,requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and [1/we] support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. [I/We]have reviewed(i)the Draft Environmental Impact Statement("DEIS,,),prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW,,), dated April 2019, and last revised,October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS„), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix I (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan("Comprehensive Plan,,), adopted in November 2020 and(iv)the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. [IAN e) concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further,the FEIS analyzed,in great detail. how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore,as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, I I/We I support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project, [I/We I respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours, DINA4A'er [Namej � [Address] gt6 �,q qoAt- 11'�91 ,d., -,�..�,...._..... ,�, Al-NA °:\„\:::: W"I 'WAMN, ms'sVr 4�!,,, .e AD to FV *� � sa t$ \ x ..` 11 iow , ai„ •,\.�<� <('�`' `1�..:� ' t'��� �t��:"es`° ,� � g��r�: } g¢ ,` t��7 �k�[�.p 4§�{�9 gy#y�y<pim $�R t��g��} � ' ToAlp rTl bv6 I , � �#'� @ �o' �. p € � N ' pl4 UOe ', &? cut -�'ftt 56655 o a bnO. 0, uftld;N`O'D- � 1`' � (� " 8'� m m'ldg4 w""! 3 3t: 10 0- ' 6Mon Wim = 'MM ° gip ^,-Amo"li` "" �` � x r 1 <°€ °,Budd g'Pond a& 6i o1 odff OP boln ' ,ow„^ � tip `s ° ; ° w t6 l i � _-'; . d*d,`.Ap 1�2019, andlk rind �� 0, -WI Ito P)3--046ptodin N&66W M2 ,Pod: v) @ lo md YN I ' me 'tP g eIMI 64Yth, # pi,poli IN m p mo w ` ° t@ � rof 84h bAf SPOL314 � 1€ k I Oft ; 11 € t 1 , Y,Yom al,-1, q a ��v1��° 00 x „$and<FC5� .-+�`I++ b 1 ,°,Ny e „ �e�.y�a Z�ee" A� �x +v ��o��, �D \oV�1:.:v v`Aw,ia�` ��w�\o �.,A. r.,A«wtiy `a^a�<�rsas „lk0411 31 ;'�\"a�,<��e�`��\�i�y�a�,V<vAA\AVvV�,Av2�V�w?vwv1`�O�e\"j�lA�e��\�e:e���.•'yI\A`�r�Ac�AV\\,w�Oa��:av�Av.vv.a�AeAAtivVC�„Ati�o���,�\�:y,yAAf.``v�<Fa.���,.�'�� ” + 3�,�e ��,\v�A\wm. - .a:a:��. y�v��� ��a a�.�v„C���:�.A �I,„tom <.&V y, A�`,A:v���,\,„A��yv ��.��>�Zo.�,� �, Ate: �'„•, w� . a� z\o� ` .�� ..` =�u old 1 07 f POP or 6 r° m Rite, POY NOW a &" rk41971W e t Rwn°tho PvDpq y49Qptp4,At 4QQ Buddlii ftnd RoddT 00th6ld,?,J ,'Y'A a ? thu'` 1 ' opt '"° 11' splltic�u. fut thy. r on 202I'l� � .,�° Mal Exqqflu 1Wo P qrmlt,to dovulupJhe Ptujodd(1/woJ§vp '° Thp lif4 t[s u 9MVf91I'0u�prud,r�mlhlO duv I -ro"qAt.a , a 'hhvu vtgwpd":i)�� a Draft,Buvj-uIia, qpt l et' to t '"}. ''pr 'hy.��Wf Orp Ok 'i�1 soft f'°��,°;` 4�l a v A�c� € (� 4I, 1 .t 1, ,BAY � # 1,h t tut s p1 d ty"PWS d4tod Aprit:2 20, iud l t, vls� 414 202-1, O Nn�ft dygli'ln A Clea x luv���is 0 P1401, ut a (v =WIs ep�hp lv th }�Q1��J� �}1}.91,1 0,, 1 {A- gs(�/��t(t���}1���}�u�@(�{�� � y��J� �tq��. '{(��;/s��u�u�j,w1 .thry��ZBA1s" ?(�pStl��y{�apof }ft-��qt , �j &@J1gTas'k4+#� �WgJoQ_�LJ Y�nsf4f vft to ad4Pt@d awO!p tif'1�5f��`�3`F7�kYltl W ES.f!tS4ynd, • n_, ., 1 t dg o* the Fmi "mets O � �,��� �u.l�su�n��,clf A' "lel Exu�ptluu 1vsu "wi ¢'. ,tli 'o�� � 1 °, sR p§thu` pollpitttun baf t6,,ZBA'i1i for A$09p10 o 1069#0409 O j-mpqptfwl .rqu@§tthu t1 !4 J,;O � 4pp f CO WNW fit the"`own111@ forrthis m4tto fo . V.4"n,'LR ,. Ar4 �`hr s '"B 4 r x�g3 hz4 ��k ..S° yea« ��.. ®°�°•_a�s.�;' ;.y�r." , ., h �. - °�fi" ;¢ ` . ". ,"'�-`�ti,� " OCT ® 7 2� -ZONING BOARD OF An PEALS Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York, 11971 RE: Application for a Special Exemption Use Permit (the "Application"),to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") by 56655 Main Rd. LCC ("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa ("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: Dan's Papers wholeheartedly supports the application to'grant a special exception to allow the developers of the proposed Enclaves Hotel and Spa at 56655 Main Road in Southold. It will be a fine'addition to the community. I would appreciate that this Letter of Support be'included in the town's file for this matter. The North Fork is a great benefitto the East End and expanding the number of hotel rooms being built is critical to supporting the wine industry. This is the quality project we all hope to see. With Best Wis es, ictoria Schneps President & Co-Publisher Schneps Media & Dan's Papers October 6,2021 O¢ APPEALS Z����O BOARD Town of Southold b4S Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit(the"Application")to the Town of Southold(the"Town")Zoning Board ofAppeals("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant")in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project")at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: We currently own the property located at 56215 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971. We understand that'the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14, 2021, requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and [I/we] support the Projectand ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed,in the Town's business district. We have reviewed (i) the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS"), prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and .last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July'2021 ("FEIS'), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and (iv)the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. We concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe thatthe Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further, the FEIS analyzed, in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has`already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, we support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. We respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this°matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly'yours, Kathryn E. Witzke Y �J William M Witzke I -11DSC:5 October 1,2021 OCT 0 7 ZVI Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals ,4 0 p11 w c B(:;� OF 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit(the"Application")to the Town of Southold-(the"Town")Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC("Applicant")in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project")at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: — tIT-, equesting e] currently [ownl ] the property located at 1pb &�,N Ki0 Southold, New York 11971e]understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14,20 a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and[Uwe]support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered,responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. 'e]have reviewed(i)the Draft Environmental Impact Stafement('DEIS"),prepared by P.W. C " " last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Grosser Consulting, Inc. ( PW ), dated April 2019, and Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("ComprehensivPlan"), adopted in November 2020 and(iv)the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. Ie]concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further,the FEIS analyzed,in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Excep Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIe] support the issuancd of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. Owe]respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours, 01 .� [Name] [Address] 7�' October 1,2021 �� ra"1f�� Town of Southold ®Cr 0 7 2021 Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road ?CONING 80ARD OF APPEALS P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit(the "Application")to the Town of Southold(the"Town")Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA")by 56,655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property") Dear Chairperson Weisman: II� e] currently [own/c p] the property located at 06 Q+h f� ��t9� Southold, New York 11971. ]understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14,202%, eq4 uesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and[Uwe] support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully,considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. ([YWe]have reviewed(i)the Draft Environmental Impact'Statement("DEIS"),prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan('Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and(iv)the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS.Owe] concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further,the FEIS analyzed,in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of-Southold Code.- Therefore,as.the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exceptio#Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS,VVel support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. Ne]respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours, [Name] �A�- Address 70� � " [ ] 1 ) 9 -7-) October 3-2021 Town of Southold RECEIVED Chairperson Weisman,and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeai.= "OCT 0 54375 Main Road. ZQ21 T,O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 71111ING BOARD OF AppEALS Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit(the`",Application")to the Town of Southoia (the"Town")Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA".)by 56655 Main Road LLC("Applicant') _ in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project") at the,property looted,at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15(the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: We currently own the property looted at 1000 Laurel Avenue,Southold,New York 11971.We understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14,2021,requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and[I/wej support the Project and ask that it be granted.'The Project is a carefully considered,responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. We have reviewed (i) the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS"), prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("W"), dated April"2019, and last revised October 2619, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and Iast ievised July 2021(TEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix,I (iii) the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan("Comprehensive Plad'),adopted in November 2020 and(iv)the August 19,2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS'.We concur with the ZB Ks adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further, the FEIS analyzed, in great detail, how the'Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code.Therefore,as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the r`EIS,We support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. We respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the down's file for this matter. Thank you J for your attention in this regard. 3 Very truly KevinLinda Santacroce' 1000Laurel Avenue NY 1197f " o J October 1,2021 Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals l�C r 07 54375 Main Road � P.O.Box 1179 �� NG$oq�p of Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit(the "Application")to the Town of Southold(the"Town")Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property") Dear Chairperson Weisman: [Me] -currently ["n/oeenpy] the properly located al5b Pict ��Southold, New York 11971. le]understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application befom the ZBA on October 14,2021,requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop theTkoject and 0 w],support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered,responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. Wel have reviewed(i)the Draft Environmental Impact Statement("DEIS"),prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW;dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and(iv)the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. Oe] concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further,the FEIS analyzed,in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code.-Therefore, as the Application,before°the ZBA is fora Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already,been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, [Ie] support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. [Me]respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very,truly yours, - � z [Name] ' f1Npl2 ' ��"v 3 u cold 3 loo ooh RC-11, �FGEtVEC� October 1, 2021 OCT 7 2021 %(aN7NG BOARD Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit (the "Application") to the Town of Southold(the"Town")Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa ("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: We currently own the property located at 950 Stohson Road, Cutchogue, Southold, New York 11971. We understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14,2021,requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and[Uwe] support the Pfoject and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. We have reviewed (i) the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS"), prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and (iv) the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS we concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further, the FEIS analyzed, in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, we support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. We respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours, oa Dt", 4-�� in and Dennis Sweeney 950 Strohson Road Cutchogue,NY 1193 .1�VG U� e0"RO�Fqp October 1,2021 ZVI Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit(the "Application") to the Town of Southold(the"Town")Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC("Applicant")in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project")at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 alk/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: &011 elcurrently [oO't ipy] the property located at d ouNew York 11971. understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application bef re the ZBA on October 14,2021,requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Pr6ject and Jve] support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered,responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. [T e]have reviewed(i)the Draft Environmental Impact Statement('DEIS'),prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and(iv)the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. [fel concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further,the FEIS analyzed,in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, ] support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. @e]respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours,, [Name] /j /(ted - ' ' - - :[Ad'dres's] '�,5'•(� ��')��""—.. f`-'`9� �'`- l� October 1,2021 Town of thold ChairpersonWeisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals �OP�D�F PPP�P4 54375 Main Road _, t�"gG P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit(the"Application")to the Town of Southold(the"Town")Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: Jul��� �� "� P—d [I/We] currently [own/occupy] the property located at Southold, New York 11971. [I/We]understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14,2021,requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and[Uwe]support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. [I/We]have reviewed(i)the Draft Environmental Impact Statement("DEIS"),prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and(iv)the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. [I/we] concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further,the FEIS analyzed,in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, [I/We] support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. [I/We]respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours„ -J [Name] [Address] October 1,2021 Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals QCT I lqz 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 119716 wt'`.n�[a C+ 1 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit (the "Application")to the Town of Southold(the"Town")Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: 34/6d yo✓riys AvE [I/We] currently [own/occupy] the property located at , Southold, New York 11971. [I/We]understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14,2021,requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and[I/we] support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. [I/We]have reviewed(i)the Draft Environmental Impact Statement("DEIS"),prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and(iv)the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. [I/we] concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further,the FEIS analyzed,in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, [I/We] support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. [I/We]respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Ve V truly yours, [Name] [Address] �w October 1,2021 X021 oc . Town of Southold oP�a of Ppp�P� Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 7 GNt�G 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: ' Application for a Special Exception Use Permit(the "Application")to the Town of Southold(the"Town")Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant") in connection with the•proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project")at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: (I We] currently owr cu ] the property located atlfOd 9 _ 'Southold, New York 11971. a understand that the Applicant will be resenting the App i�be re the ZBA on October ] PP P 14,2021,requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the•Project and( e] support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. (�XWe]have reviewed(i)the Draft Environmental Impact Statement("DEIS"),prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW% dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan("Comprehensive plan"), adopted in November 2020 and(iv)the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. e]concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adop ed Comprehensive Plan. Further,the FEIS analyzed,in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application,before the ZBA is for a Special-Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS,& le] support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. (QWe]respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. = Very truly yours; [Nam6] . l!W.J ,' .iii. . _ ' ° . i,, ,i.. ;z. , '[1�ddress]`a �.•' - ;'s . .. yy 3 3\,,.cc.£,e'`"a ','„✓'inf fly M x ,^y �%y g,3�,a , {ei.11t , (l � �vAte , "E ;Ylx+'1+iv�g„r '7 biz�RliiR4 'yoF �.:Xx'x ,,, p ',� ew+ .LQi T"llp-•^" ,s 'I",J ., , W.F. � „ y(,�{,�.,�1 '(ry�p{y Y,.,,"yw, s° -�>t� as " at"'; tact: 1a i I'rt�je Y W-&-care . � '; u Y € «j' g��` r} y,, y"gyp� r�"' n0 S}lfk'S L> CaAc �V> �IJ'l.Ck ,1 "tFAY,�} 4r, ` yp� t,. " "'> �. ,��.>`- N WWI, bn Y y Y° .v�" -. '.,."` k %3;�,«> A 1�,, ltllf � Ij) `� F" �,, Xl R , � °ssui>lt si7 R, 'P � ,, ,M Jlit , ted' i' st !M` a7m^9 M-0 a6tict; a ! g3yr4r , � fti 91 tic�nxts :Palpv '",'sib % ".A 9,04 Peal ehensf °Ila t�t7 �t ;`l [ {3t ?NO {� "rga r' yam q. ,::'' x,; W �L,+1„V,R' jeot �WO"Niizi er ,t i M '4d in'r' a ' � c cV-tbt teHa� 431"r e,js C"f'.,;�f"3�'`� ,a, „`?`�° ,✓.,v;`",st�:'`�a>ir AL ON M­ .,¢Ue fes'>�'£`"' -°s°efY'» ,".,6f. " / �,vry'S;'�,y'�' �mt 'Yry' 'yy �t " .:,i>"riG{ 'Ut,R.(rg 'Sn+S. 4 %k JG�E4..y 1� 7'V�' �",p k,•"' fi "C b sH-"m,..,?�,> `a°:*ES`%°c,'- .» 'a,�vy r>� .�, ',".'�. £r 9s_ iiy,'ben" i �� adopt "°Z '';, _ _ ` old ^E,r»""` d i , , RAV 'f.� GAk/?tay, e?V„r,7y;,\+ T4J`e4t•"> 2 2� A �,. IR ya„tGn3cF,�'S 141 "P`��� E��rx����;4:0�x.A'`��,�,"F,`"�• `5�>s � �, 's v�,.;:�"°'" �.�„t/��y�s>;'"� "�%%'"�� �"',"x°4',£:i,x"y��" ��,ri�';E'„£''`�'".•� ���rj '3 � es,d,,t`bs` ii xy +�> ,. `- '.NST ',-�', u �"'v"�*,�,,5•�. ' ,y+Y",v_ ^,R.�ii \aAL'.>,y .' `a�"� '� ".mn' '-5au>`�` fl� 'y'v a' 4 " 'c.k.�' r�.�� ,vrf- i �� -a v,'s;>-"�,"v�'�y;'�i,�<� ,,s 'R 35:; � >`'a�.3,s,z;S ''-y,`�,i'�t vv�i;€`_t•°„ %�N� » ,q,,�: '>>.,3-" 't -\tea ,•xxx<' �,g55i � t3 w42 � f 21 14371'm HU I�eV Wss., .. w =y,ysy»'Fi 7ZRSh.,f,-. ,' sr; "s ” ",r,.. s" >v a;;t>€', «°•;�:v,y^`.` -,x,','.s.-� = ;�,f� 2, +.,"yr, �'«'. i , , s --�,.v 4,• :6;;,,, axe, "�"�"a;%i,,y., "t ;"y"�• .L�+k� rim ,��.. "��;`«`"h" �» `;� �6> "a, '� Wei,\ ;r>,V IF 1 _.» �j'',�., �tf'!, "w ;'Fy.=;erory5"e9'ry"'a.,S.. \� \ \ fie, yk:.;.••\..> .„�'r",°c,s3�"t,,d„ �, "',�#: -,p',e', } - ENO-SK -Z- N< October 8,2021 OCT 0 2021 Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit (the "Application") to the Town of Southold(the"Town")Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: I currently own the property located at 160 Blue Marlin Drive Southold, New York 11971. I understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14,2021,requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and[Uwe] support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. I have reviewed(i)the Draft Environmental Impact Statement("DEIS"), prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and(iv) the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. I concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further,the FEIS analyzed,in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, I support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. I respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours, Erweyf-Jo-rl�.e�. I I ` {r^7`j pr}1�. P [-�J-L�lS'f OCT 0 2029 Zoning Board of Appeals - ,�,�,�.�.,��.-- -� October 4,2021 - �, Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit (the "Application") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa ("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: I currently own the property located at 325 Bay Home Road, Southold, New York 11971. 1 understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14, 2021, requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and [1/we] support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. I have reviewed (i) the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS"), prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020, and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii) the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and (iv) the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. I concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan.Further,the FEIS analyzed, in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code.Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, I support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. I respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours, Donna Blanchard R MW ft r s oft � i October 1, 2021 Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for a,Special Exception Use Permit(the "Application")to the Town of Southold(the"Town")Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves, Hotel and Spa("Project")-at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000=63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: [I/We] currently [own/occupy] the property located at ��` ' Southold, New York 11971. [I/We]understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on'October 14,2021,requesting a Special Exception Use Pen-nit to develop the Project and[l/we] support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. [I/We] have reviewed(i)the Draft Environmental Impact Statement("DEIS"), prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive PIan("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and (iv)the August 19,2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEI& [1/we] concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS'and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further,the FEIS.analyzed,in great detail, how the`Project meets the criteria for the issuance-of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is fora Special Exception Use Pennit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted:by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, [I/We] support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. [I/We]respectfully request that this Letter of Supportbe included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this"regard. Very truly yours, f� [Name] (�_ f r 2 1 [Address] 0911 i Town of Southold, October 4,2021 To Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals ivED I 54375 Main Road 1 P.O. Box 1179 5,00 Southold,New York 11971 Re:Application for a Special Exception Use Permit by 56655 Main Road LLC in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 Dear Chairperson Weisman and Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals: We live and work on the North Fork as members of the North Fork community and important stakeholders.We love the North Fork as much as you do,we've put our money where our mouth is and would like to help guide the changes facing all of us. We are interested in achieving a sustainable economy on the North Fork.We believe that economy is instrumental to maintain what we all love on the North Fork. For that reason,we ask you to grant the special Exception for the Enclaves Hotel and Spa. The North Fork is attractive not just to us who work and live here. For that reason,many people like to come and enjoy the plethora of things that can be experienced on the North Fork: our Aqua- and Agriculture, our Farm-to-Table culture,and our natural beauty on and off the water.This has been the case for a long time. The North Fork was a vacation hot spot a century ago'. Hotels have been an integral part of our community character for well over a century. Historically,large resort hotels existed all over the North Fork at the turn of the 19"-20" Century'to accommodate visitors.The disappearance of these grand hotels has since given way to more and more suburban sprawl.We would argue Suburban sprawl and its substantial noise and traffic has changed the North Fork more than anything else. But of course,visitors can also bring traffic and noise, two of the most important nuisances residents experience in the changing North Fork. We want to be a proactive part of the management of these inevitable evils: noise and traffic are issues that always exist in any successful region that is 'James Kindle,"The North Fork was a Vacation Hot Spot a century Ago",The New York Times,September 11, 2009,found at https://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/13/nyreaion/13hotelIi.htmI z Geoffrey K. Fleming and Amy Kasuga Folk,"Hotels and Inns of Long Island's North Fork"Charleston,S.C.2009: The History Press. ISBN: 1596297255. r� t 1 OCT 0 8 I Toning Board of Appeals as attractive as the North Fork. They can be mitigated. The Enclaves has helped-you-and°mitigated— �C these issues in the process of the past 4 years. We cannot forget that these same visitors also improve our economy. We all enjoy the benefits of incremental tax revenue and the creation of establishments for us all to enjoy and rely on. Places where our kids can find jobs, summer jobs while in college,and careers for those who would like to stay. We provide many of these jobs and careers, often taken for granted. Visitors can be divided in two groups, day-trippers and visitors who stay overnight. It has been documented for decades that overnight visitors not only spend much more money than day-trippers do. But also, overnight visitors participate more in community events.And maybe most importantly, overnight visitors, compared to day-trippers,are far less of a burden on our region's fragile transportation infrastructure.'They do not travel as much on our access roads during start and end- of-day ore weekend periods, and reduce traffic overall compared to the traffic created by day- trippers. But the North Fork does not have adequate places to stay overnight. Hotels have disappeared, making a day trip the only way to experience the North Fork for so many. Many of the activities in our region involve alcohol,including vineyards,beer brewers, distillers,but also the entire farm to table industry.A stay overnight is infinitely safer than a daytrip when participating in these events. Safer for visitors and residents alike. Deeply invested in the North Fork,we know the expense involved in running a business in New York State,in Suffolk County, on the North Fork. Acquisition costs, employment costs,cost of regulation and taxation, to name but a few,all have risen exponentially. Quite a few of us are integral to maintain the agricultural lands of the North Fork as farmers. Farmland others merely pay lip service to.We understand better than most our economy must be sustainable to maintain our rural character and our North Fork way of live, fragile in tourism infrastructure and natural bounty. It is not that long ago that the farms on the North Fork were no longer able to make a go of it. And the threat that housing would be the last crop on our precious farmland was a reality. We are blessed with a new economy, so many other regions would beg for.'It is important that we do not kill the goose with the golden egg.A golden egg we all reap the benefits off. Recent more and more suburban development has complicated the functioning of our traditional way of life: agriculture and aquaculture.'This is not a new problem in New York State. Farmers are 3 The North Fork Promotion Council, Inc.maintained statistics until 2019, based on formulas provided by the County of Suffolk, published annually. 4 Empire State Development, "Exploring New York State is an amazing Business." "Tourism Industry is Crucial to New York's growth." Found at https://esd.ny.gov/industries/tourism 5 Dirk Johnson,"As farm meets suburb,sides clash",the New York Times,June 9, 1990 found at https.//www.nvtimes.com/1990/06/09/us/as-farm-meets-suburb-sides-clash html OCT 0,9 often not good suburban neighbors; they can't be by their very nature.Because what%they do 202' typically causes what would be considered a nuisance in any suburban environment. Smells,'Sou�ids, Noise,Dust,Traffic. That is why purchasers of real estate on the North Fork are presented a UFgpp,�gCS disclosure offanner's rights prior purchasing real estate next to a farm. Agriculture and aquaculture remain at the heart of the success of our economy.The Town of Southold over the coming years will face increasing pressure from development. One kind of development will support the traditional way of life on the North Fork and that what makes the North Fork so special to us all. Other development, however,will just facilitate suburban sprawl. Make no mistake,these two kinds of development are in stark contrast and often collide. Let us distinguish between those two kinds of development. This project is one that will support our farmers and our farm to table culture by sourcing human resources,products,and services locally and providing places to stay and helpful services to visitors who in turn support the local economy. And, of course,it is fought by suburban sprawl. The Enclaves is a project that benefits the sustainable functioning of our farms and our aquaculture, all that we all love so much on the North Fork.The project also will provide employment and careers for so many young people to stay and live on the North Fork is they so choose. It helps to mitigate the traffic problems day-trippers and suburban sprawl cause.And the Enclaves provides benefits suburban sprawl does not. This applicant in its other existing North Fork endeavors has proven to the community to contribute greatly to what makes the North Fork so special,as one of the Best of the North Fork. The process to create a project as the Enclaves which requires a large scale investment is expensive and cumbersome. For many applicants it appears insufficiently transparent. It may soon,if we are not careful,become entirely economically impossible to do anything substantial to help the community thrive. Our children will not be able to make a living if that happens, and our farms and business might all fail again,as we have seen before.And suburban sprawl will result as we have never seen before. The Town has subjected the applicant here to rigorous inquiry and analysis. We support these inquiries and analyses.And here,all these inquiries and analyses have been satisfactorily adopted by all agencies involved,including but not limited to: (i) the Draft Environmental Impact Statement("DEIS"),dated April 2019,and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"),including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii) the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and (iv) the August 19,2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. The applicant purchased a property in the Hamlet Business zone,where a hotel and its accessory uses are permitted by ZBA issued special exception. We concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further, the i 6;oA OCT 08 FEIS analyzed,in great detail,how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of`of a Special ®2� Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. NG BOARD OF App,ALS Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS,we support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project.A rejection of what was previously approved at this point would make makes very little if any sense. We respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard, feel free to contact us with any questions you may have. Sincerely, The Best of the North Fork The Best of the North Fork,Inc.(information) "Un the North Fork Community" Ken Homan Braun's Seagood e.a. Anthony Lomangino Star Recycling, Inc. e.a. Joseph Macari Macari Vineyards e.a. Joseph Petrocelli Raphael Vineyards e.a. Christopher Pia Breeze Hill Farms e.a. Charles Salice North Fork Properties e.a. Victoria Schnepps Schnepps Media e.a. Stacey Lynne Soloviev Santa's Christmas Tree Farms e.a. Jonathan Tibbett North Fork Table and Inn e.a. Richard Vandenburgh Greenport Brewery e.a. DiC T 2021 Oct Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit (the "Application") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C.Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: I currently own the property located at_8583 New Suffolk Avenue,Cutchogue,NY_11935. 1 understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14, 2021, requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and [1/we] support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered,responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. I have reviewed(i)the Draft Environmental Impact Statement("DEIS"),prepared by P.W.Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement, prepared by PW, dated April 2020, and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and (iv) the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. I concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further, the FEIS analyzed, in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, I support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. I respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours, Berna Feuerstein 8583 New Suffolk Ave, Cutchogue,NY RECEIVE® October 11, 2021 Town of Southold OCT 2021 Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS P.O. Box 1179 ^ N osc Southold, New York 11971 I Re;, Application for a Special Exception Use Permit (the "Application") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA") by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa ("Project") at the property 3 located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: I currently own the property located at 500 Castle Hill Road, Cutchogue, New York 11935. 1 understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14, 2021, requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and I support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. I have reviewed (i)the Draft Environmental Impact Statement("DEIS"), prepared by P.W. ` Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement, prepared by PW, dated April 2020, and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii) the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and (iv) the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. I concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further, the FEIS analyzed, in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, I support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. I respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter, Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours, Thomas Juul- Manse i 500 Castle Hill Roa Cutchogue, NY 935 Fuentes, Kim From: Ann Ristuccia <ristuccia@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 3:24 PMF� To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: ZBA metting re: Enclaves hotel 'OCT 12 2021 To : Leslie Kanes Weisman ZONING BOARD OF APPALS Robert W Lehnert, Jr Eric Dantes I" Patricia Acampora Nicholas Planamento Kim Fuentes I am asking you to vote against any special exceptions for the enclaves hotel. In fact I would like you to vote NO to this behemoth structure altogether. -- 40 rooms, 250 person event space, etc.? It's out of touch with everything that makes Southold the wonderful Hamlet and Town that it is now. Southold is a charming, unique place that reflects the heritage of it's founders. This structure and its activities will be destructive to the well being, the quality of life, of Southold Res idents,Taxpayers and Voters. Please think of this as your legacy to the people of Southold. How do you want to be remembered? Sincerely, Ann Ristuccia 3905 N Bayview Road Southold, NY 11971 631 7651111 i Fuentes, Kim From: Jim Haag <jhaag@verdura.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 9:34 AM To: Michaelis,Jessica; Russell, Scott Cc: Fuentes, Kim; Sakarellos, Elizabeth Subject: RE:The Enclaves Jessica, you are a Saint. I was just worrying about this. Thanks so very much to everyone for their consideration. Fo EIVED /� Jim1l-----Original Message----- ard of,4ppeals From: Michaelis, Jessica <jessicam@southoldtownny.goSent: Wednesday, October 13, 20219:15 AM To: Jim Haag <jhaag@verdura.com>; Russell, Scott <scottr@south oldtownny.gov> Cc: Fuentes, Kim <kimf@southoldtownny.gov>; Sakarellos, Elizabeth <elizabeth.sakarellos@town.southold.ny.us> Subject: RE: The Enclaves **CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.** Good Morning Mr. Haag, I have copied Kim Fuentes, Secretary to the Zoning Board of Appeals and Elizabeth Sakarellos, Office Assistant in the Zoning Board of Appeals office. The Enclaves project is currently in front of the Zoning Board. Thank you, Jessica Michaelis, Office Assistant Southold Town Planning Department 54375 NYS Route 25 N P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: 631-765-1938 Email: JessicaM@southoldtownny.gov 1 l -----Original Message----- From: Jim Haag <jhaag@verdura.com> Sent: Monday, October 11, 20213:36 PM To: Russell, Scott <scottr@south oldtownny.gov>; Michaelis, Jessica <jessicam@southoldtownny.gov> Subject: The Enclaves Dear Mr. Russell and friends on the Planning Board, It is nice to be in touch again. If I have addressed this to the wrong division of the Town, please would you kindly forward for me. And thanks for confirming receipt. I'd appreciate it if you'd read this anyway. I know that my representatives at Town Hall understand what makes Southold special. You have focused on preservation and have usually done the right thing when it comes to keeping the essential character of our town intact. For this I am grateful and' I have told you all this repeatedly in correspondence and at the Polls. This is why I am baffled that this proposed mega complex called The Enclaves is seriously being considered. It is in direct conflict with who we are on the north fork. It is something that belongs in Huntington or Smithtown. But not here. Everyone tolerates and / or appreciates the agricultural entertainment complexes because they keep the farmers farming. The Vineyards add to the character of the region (and you have stopped their becoming inappropriate entertainment complexes when called on to do so.) But this to me would be an awful thing, one that can never be undone. We need to keep things on a smaller scale, routed in tradition, compatible with our character. This should be done for the people who live here first. If we do, people will come and admire what we have kept intact. When I first drove out to the north fork in the late 1980s I was overwhelmed with the specialness of the place. I actually could not believe my eyes. I never wanted to leave. And I didn't. ( Mattituck Plaza threw me as that took me back to Massapequa in a flash. I don't think it should have been approved in its urban sprawl configuration.) 2 1 You are entrusted in developing our Town in the right way. Please don't bring huge hotels and banqueting centers. This is killing me. Why would we do this? Please, I beg you, do not approve this. Follow the example of Greenport's Menhaden hotel which brought charm and sophistication in the form of an appropriate boutique hotel. Anyway, I can give you reasons not to do this like groundwater and traffic. But I don't think I need to. It is just wrong. Please do the right thing. 5� I really appreciate your time reading this. James Haag Orient 6319026452 Sent from my iPhone ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 3 W E I T Z RECEIUEa & OCT 1 2021 L U Y. E N B E R G LZa�1��g�ar�Of A1y}� A P R l) 1 1 S S 1 I! N A I C !) R P f) It A 1 1 I) .• ooec' tJ' 1 A N r) 1• 1, 1 C 1 N 71111 11ROJ\i)\\.11' \l•\1 1QIt1<.N1'111403-!7;36 �� 1•r\\213.344;i4Gl PERRY WE1T2 El I Z1.1 X CMI 1 Fd.wN WY,"CR q(an„nwmtrnn ARTHUR LUXENDERG aAd.naed Y.+rnin ROBERTJ GORDON-tt ,rwuwd mgatJa PHAN T ALVARADO' CHARLES M FERGUSON JOSEPH LOlOI JAMES S dHOMPSDN it •ndmmNWrn Ru BENNO ASHRAFI t SILVIAA FERMANIAN BRENDAN A MCDONOUGH TT WIL LIAM A`WALSH-- w•rwd wrn UD PETER BEIRNEt STUARTR FRIEDMANKRISTEN fALLER It JASON WEINER• A•-'n•d•++rnvA JAWMESJ SILSBORROW MARY GRABISH GAFFNEY Q MICHELLE MURTHA 9§ JASONP WEINSTEIN, +t Ac--r,..^.dn cA -Hu_i­CO DEW"BOLTON. ANDREWJ GAYOSO MELINDAOAMSNOK6S'' MARK S WEINST§IN tt., ,Hbeemn a.^ct ERIN M BOYLE•- DIANA GJONAJ* PAUL F NOVAK* 'DANICL 6 WEISS 6H:.•emn-dn DC AMBRE J DRANOIS ,ALANI GOLANSKI I JOSIAH W PARKER: LARA H WEISSMAN TT •am eemnedm rl MARK BRATT1, DANIELLE GOLD iL 1.ICHAELE PEDERSON LAUREN A•WEITZ so Atte eamumntw SAMANTHA BREAKSTONE LAWRENCE GOLDHIRSCH•° BRANDON PERLMAN JUSTINJ WEIT2 liH<mmaedww JOHN M,DROADDUS-• LAURA GREEN tt STUART S,PERRY' MAUiKWVEIIZ •aw vmmadnvA PATI!BURSHTYN It CODYM GREENES 9 ADAM RAFFO MARCI WILLICK, Ran ea^u�'^NA LISA NATHANSON BUSCH tt ROBIN L'GREENWALD•§§ PIERRE RATZIti NEIDRAS WILSON tt Ad—ed a^irmu LUT BRANDI C CHAPLIN 4 KATHERINE L HANSSON-It ELLEN RELKIN I CC- NICHOLAS WISE e° R RdmaeJ mrn 4RY'A r,WI NANCY LI CHRISTENSEN It MARIEL IANNIELLO,t- MICHAEL ROBERTS KONSTANTIN YELISAVETSKIY T >aJa"va THOMAS COM:RFORD it ERIKJACOBS CHRIS ROMANELLI It GLENN ZUCKERMAN •"mtwa-Wr.�NJ PA S WV Hw., -d-Oc TERESAA CURTIN y>{ NSENGAN JENKINS DAVID ROSEN$nN0 6 wo..At.-mmnednND6 NJ BENJAMIINOARCIt6 JEFFREYS KANCA:•fi CLARK ROSEtdGARTEN- t A w�amaednNJ a cr JU$TINEK DELANEY DAVIDAt KAUFMAN tt BRITTANY RUSSELL•• •R--^d—WnNJa OC ADAM S,OREKSLER GARY R.KLEIN It LEONARD SANDOVAL JENNA KPJSTAL EGNER I DANNY R KRAFT,JR GENNAROSAVASTANOWA--ednn-d nn NJa%U F ALEXANDER EIDEN 11 JERRY KRISTAL••§ ALEXANDRA SHEF. •Atm mmued.NJ PA TIFFANY R.ELLIS§§* JOSH KRISTAL9 GREGORY STAMATOPOULOS* October 1,2021 •`Mao Admu-dn NJ6WV MICHAEL FANELLI It DEBBILANDAU TYLER STOCK: •Hm M—M.Cl rL 6w JAIME M FARRELL a o LAURA COVEY LASZEWSKI•• PETER TAMAINI tt ••Hc•odmand n OC M ND NJ 6PA LEONARDF FELOMAN¶ DANIEL LIPNER BRIAN K TEETS,JR I •--.M-1M,.0CW NjP46 VA !L Calved Jutr NJ S°pem-Cwt Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use'Per nit(the"Applicatiob") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant') in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project")at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold,New York 11971 a/k/a S.C.Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the"Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: I currently own the property located at i LI'Main Street,Greenport,New York, 11944. I understand that the A.pplicant,•cvill be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14,2021, requesting a Special Exception.Use Permit to develop the Project and I support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered,responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. I have reviewed(i)the Draft Environmental Impact Statement("DEIS"),prepared by P.W.Grosser Consulting,Inc..("PW");dated April 2019,and last revised October 2019,(ii)the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"),including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan("Comprehensive Plan"),adopted in November 2020 and ' {iv)the August 19,2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. I concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan.Further,the FEIS•analyzed,in great detail,how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance'ofa Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. 220lAKI.l)RiV[.I ASI,till l l 2111•(I II RRY 1111 1,NPIR11102- I I I S56e754�-I I l,; I=1(I'NIIMN''1'\Rl%LAS 1,Sl1111 7(111'-HIS \N(t1-11 S.('1901167 - Ill 1111.317-0921 3011 Wl'S I-(i1t\NI)Iii VD.'S11I1•I '-1'0.IN'1 R()l I \11 48012- I I1 13-NOO-4170 2179•SZ3 I \ Therefore,as the Application before the ZBA is far a Special Exception Use Permit and this, analysis has already been reviewed,and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS,I support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. 1 respectfully request.that this Letter'of Support be included in-the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. �. U,�ry i� 1y,yours, Peary Wei I 11 Ma' Street, Greenport,NY 11944 - r i p�'"` �<.:'° -'<°> - _;,:Fob Ufa ..�. _»��• 9�''> ;,t> - , 77, a x r '�a'� .(v vA„s�°'”`•m: � 4�'�We�`id°�« "»; ��e�� a d =.�.� 9k.-'.> ec� ut +fja-,:•�`�Y°'�4n.'�,�,a ry r ' � r 202 ' " �; :� �'�> ,. ,� "Aa�5 > »x sv�xA' k. .� }} �y• .>�s,� ° s�,. ."ria�` :'_,a - ° ` ,pg " 0.f1i' f)f"°et •" H" __ „� ,<, „ ,<t,,,`� �z➢.'.,�ro a:;k>"�>,%+t�� f�;g;,� -„ zrl3 Town of Spudiovu�- ta`� �, sa_s'° 'Za '- » � ` Chaff° rsan ��V isn�an and the °teff it era a »tti Zont g t t tib J`4SIS>' ain Road > > 'P.'O.,,Bo�l ',tJ _ - �i °tY`., °B..�P wzg e ne >° e r,°er�? �' a go' y Sautl� 3 old,N16*,York-11971- Rt: 'Application for a S ecial'Exce.ti n`E ' p fat iri, f6"t To �,,`� ", n; V>° ° ° ` ;,,, .... a of Southold(the"Town*)Zo ing l t a d cil Appe'QW, -y 6655 Mitt' a�€�>�>,°�' �,"° � °� I (".Applicant"'}`in eonnecfion ! ithF' sV s .,, m ,E " Hotel and.Spa("Pr9je t" at the pro l ics a 4;far 6 aazi Rte } p P "emu 7e >_��,,, 1,4 'York- 11971 alk-/a,S.0;,,Tax,, i!Propertyt!4 ' ' o- �HrJ tom• pia"� - >" i�,"`c`�� e:'rKe ° » �� . D-ar Chairperson« eisman , "rPdd�gq ��.� s;�"h" " "r„ r°��� )^m'9;�» � °�°- �� °�° ` ��r•4 q'°" " o V4fe currently own the pto '6afed °atS $3g` t 1k Avb fiW 70t, �h197 1. ��e undersand that the 1:�pplican till h�'p'�esetiiin ,th � ation before i o'er °t�b�obt�� �; , Ppv >° t4,re 1,requesting a'Spe ialEx&lafican°°LIse,Permit`tOdevel'opstTtd',Pr+n��t��it ° v °a 4�it�th�';�j � ', and ask,that it be granted.°Tfte,, a v ect-i a`:careful�y coli sdet cespoitsitil' xri ri a ° i 'in,the Town's b,usiness,distrio ' � e°ha'�e re£ie = cl, z: i Ural° `varonmental` mpact StatonX M` Grosses:, onsultitag,a,Inc.: " `' ,ctcd::Aprila Ol ,'aiid°'list % 'y ,tf° q ; >z< ii . ia i i fv" " Ervironn�enfal°Impaci t t rn �it;pi p r i1G"y> 31�,cif �.r�pt'itk 026 a! l t r �:�ig��I ' s „ �Pca indlu iz�g'tlie'Special`L. iptlon° '` ¢T�+�rirtiW ly i in Append ,,°ijiH), 1W,wo Cornpre4easiv�Plan, Cohipfehe iv&.P- „ 8A-Resolutic�,n ac 'eptin �the"F15 , pet%ii# ti " , 'r ,acltin ? �tthst'" �g�w�.a the=Projctsconi'stern,°v�itlt'`ttido',Iitrl' (nrigz ��iix,x �t hate` ie PI�9jectmeelsi e�,cnte!'1�.T forth w�G` Q0 _e 1l ll Exge�tiq AJ y �i)� af 8butholif�:ode: Therefore°ts,,the,,A lei�t i bet' li Ei w-b a ii3il; cad , 2'+ ^s"tg �� and ehis'analysis-has,already,lei.r", vcta=tti,nt3' p`tdbrx€#i ,y ,di*sIa; sp9 elle issuanc&of flip' `peciat Eatcelitic�n Use'Pertixitufcir ' , ., ° ,� t,.r-.` »- '� ��3:�m�>�$h,���gr �,�»a,4��°;,,,, . . »➢">.E way°�°y,.," • ' .." °s;°`M �� ' '° 91 eves ectftzll rc txest tli'atr=chi`s�.;etic", �f t€ x t l p Y �I �r�ra, .° ,» -{>�D a x�'< o{°->-< +q" \ tN Thank you for °°♦our attentttn'4tn�thts re ardf ,a°aE <ro,ai ,,r°:: ° v:,s, - ' :Q tful' >g �` > , �`3x c&cap i�,'��/, 'Y 1•_c< � �y eaa�°as�'''. ,e 9q0'. >5&'a b:, 9 e"'kok `�?-,'t •>a eA�' .,"`e r`l3'e a,(�i>,eb'.��,✓ he't�>,a >S 77 �y�q�e;_�,p,, y� �++ py.��>.� v.,l'k'a'iV V.D 1t+i,'i 6kk , ik ,f k.A'V yl�l, '�k',y ",e F�"Qi6>" a W �y]{ x,. ay��yS�,re "'D-k>> ir��i ANO filie'"?, .>.Sa , � to >r r ,� r - -"✓�,M r'Y,'�LiJ r��,rii,V}°(„��� �*'3.' ,5��, ��, mi x>`"° ye�YrW�df,�° U, f RECEIVED SOUTHOLD PoE�RK DISTRICT P.O. BOX 959 SOUTHbLb, L.I., N.Y 11971 OCT 1 631-765-6019 October 13,2021 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Kim Fuentes-ZBA Town of Southold 54375 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 Dear Ms. Fuentes, The Southold Park District-Board of Commissioners would like to address the Enclaves Hotel project coming before the Zoning Board's meeting on October 14 , 2021'. They are aware of the situation this may impose to the Town of Southold and at this time do not have an 'opinion either way on whether the special'exemption is approved or not. The Southold Park District does have bylaws-in place for,the resident's and non-resident's who may access any of our properties during the summer months. If a problem arises with our, properties it will be addressed by the board. Sincerely Eileen Sayre Southold Park District Secretary/Treasurer cc. Commissioner Daniel Hagerman Commissioner Thomas Helinski Commissioner William Byrnes Breslin Appraisal Co., Inc. F,ra,,-. A_3-&z _l 44 E lm Street, Suite 5 Huntington, NY 11743 : (631) 271-7277 Fax (631) 271-7298 John J. Breslin, Jr., President Email:jbreslingbreslinappraisal.com October 14, 2021 �5 Via Hand Delivery Honorable Chairman Leslie Kanes Weisman and Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold 54375 Main Road Post Office Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Application of The Enclaves Motel& Restaurant Property Location: 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 SCTM#: 1000-063.00-03.00-015.000 Dear Chairman Weisman and Members of the Board, In connection with the above-captioned matter, I have been retained to give an opinion on the impact on real property values resulting from the instant application. This study is being made with reference to applicable Town of Southold ("Town") Zoning regulations, the Town's 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update, the Town's 2005 Hamlet Study, as well as the relevant sections of New York State Town Law. In addition, the'study is also made with reference to the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") October 7, 2021 Findings Statement regarding this application, commensurate with the requirements of the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA"). The Appraiser will affirm that items contained herein are the Appraiser's opinions and as to factual matters set forth herein I affirm the same to be truthful. These affirmations are subject to the limited conditions including and made a part of this report. In making this study, I have undertaken the following steps: 1. Reviewed the application materials. 2. Inspected the property and the neighborhood it is situated in. 3. Discussed the application with the applicant and or his representatives and respective consultants, attorneys, etc. File No. 20-6000 Breslin Appraisal Co.,Inc z 4. Reviewed municipal data concerning the property, including FEIS. 5. Reviewed comments made to the FEIS. L) 6. 6. Reviewed comments made by the public. 7. Reviewed the ZBA's October 7, 2021 SEQRA Findings Statement. The applicant proposes to develop the subject property, a 6.75-acre parcel zoned Hamlet Business, with a seventy-four (74) seat restaurant and forty-four (44) unit boutique hotel. The applicant's development plan for the restaurant calls for the existing residential structure(formerly the Hedges B&B) to be renovated consistent with its historic character and connected to an accessory building. The renovation is intended to preserve the historic appearance of the structure so that it meets both the goals set forth in the Hamlet Business District Amended Comprehensive Plan and the Historic corridor along Main Road, as well as complimenting the existing streetscape. The hotel will be a new two (2) story"L" shaped building with a basement situated behind the restaurant building and a densely planted privet hedge for screening of the hotel facility. The subject parcel has a frontage of approximately 191.30 feet on the north-side of Main Road, also known as New York State Route 25, and extends to a depth of 928.03 feet where it abuts the Long Island Railroad ROW.The depth of the parcel is ideal for providing the hotel use in the rear portion of the lot. It should be noted that a rear-yard second use on other deeper lots on Main Road on both sides of the street, with a similar situation existing just to the west with retail in the front-yard and boat storage in the rear-yard. The Long Island Railroad tracks to the north provide a natural separation point between the Hamlet Business District and development to the north. The subject is located in the Hamlet Business District, which is the primary Business area in Southold. The FEIS goes into great detail about the district's makeup, uses, desired goals, etc. It is not necessary for me to repeat the contents of the FEIS, as heretofore noted, other than to say that Hamlet Business District is the hub of commercial activity. The Town's goal is for this area to continue and prosper with the uses and businesses, ideally working in harmony, to provide necessary goods and services to the community, along with a commercial tax base that helps stimulate economic activity for the Town to promote economic viability. It is always a competing balance between the need for economic growth and the desire to limit change in a community and this competition is particularly evident on the east end of Long Island where the year-round residents rely on tourism and summer populations to sustain and grow the local economy against an increase in population.Having read the local community's comments to the FEIS, this conflict is readily apparent. Most of the concerns raised concern traffic and in File No. 20-6000 Breslin Appraisal Co., Inc reading the community's correspondence the traffic volumes are considered to already be an issue, and any addition is unwelcomed. Regardless, the Board in analyzing the Special Exception Permit criteria must consider the concerns and views of the public's comments through the standards of the Code, not in a vacuum and not based on the number of critical comments. The Board must view the applicant's proposal against as of Right Development.A property owner has the right to develop their property and utilize it commensurate with applicable law. Therefore, in analyzing Town Code Special Exception Permit criteria, it is not a question of viewing these standards against a"no action"scenario or existing conditions,rather the application must be viewed against other permissible uses in the Hamlet Business District. Here,the FEIS and, subsequently, the BZA's SEQRA Findings Statement provide a detailed analysis of the Special Exception application (i.e., hotel with restaurant) compared to other pefmitted uses in the Hamlet Business District. The FEIS notes an As-of-Right Plan that depicts the proposed restaurant, a permitted use, along with a 30,000 square foot non-medical office building (the "As-of-Right Plan"), which is also a permitted use. This As-of-Right Plan shows that the same complies with the Town Zoning Code, etc. The analysis also shows that the As-of-Right Plan will generate a higher amount of nitrogen discharged into the ground than the applicant's development project and will generate greater daily traffic during the weekday peak hours, both morning and evening. In the analysis of the As-of-Right Plan compared to the hotel use,the hotel use provides greater compliance with the goals of the Hamlet Business District and the updated Comprehensive Plan by generating tourist dollars, tax revenue, jobs, and users of the hotel will also be users of the local businesses within walking distance of the hotel. In addition, the applicant's hotel project, a very modest development plan, has far less lot coverage and more landscaping that what is provided under the As-of-Right Plan. The full details of this analysis are laid out in the FEIS in Table 25, at Section 5.0. The applicant has designed the site so the activities on site,specifically the hotel activities, are screened from the view,particularly from the residentially utilized properties east. The adjoining property is a residential home but is in the Hamlet Business Zone. The combination of the building,landscaping and low-level lighting will alleviate both visual and sound concerns. Recent modifications to the site plan resulting from the FEIS comments have resulted in further modifications to better shield and mitigate the impacts, all of which are duly noted and accepted by the ZBA in its written SEQRA Findings Statement. File No. 20-6000 Breslin Appraisal Co., Inc 4 The market information contained in the FEIS clearly shows a tremendous need for the applicant's hotel use. I believe that the applicant's proposed development of the property meets the required standards outlined under the Town Code for a Special Exception Permit for a hotel use. The FEIS goes through, in detail, all of the Specific Exception Permit standards for the hotel use, as well as the general standards and this is duly noted and accepted by the ZBA in its SEQRA Findings Statement. As such, there is no reason for me to repeat the detailed information noted in the FEIS and accepted by the ZBA. I will,however, address specific matters that relate to issues that are within my role. Several of the standards discuss the appropriateness of the location its compatibility with the surrounding land uses and development pattern. The subject property is situated in the Town's Hamlet Business District on Main Road. The subject property is properly located on the main commercial roadway in the Business District and the hotel/restaurant use is appropriate for a parcel on Main Road. The restaurant is an unconditionally permitted use and several other restaurants exist along the roadway in the immediate vicinity. The hotel will be a use that will complement and help support the local businesses. The hotel building is designed to be at a height similar to other buildings, it is setback in compliance with all Code requirements and no variance relief is required with this development application. The overall lot coverage is substantially below that which is permitted by Town Code. Landscaping and green space are substantial,which mitigates and ensures that the new on-site structures will be appropriately scaled as it relates to neighboring properties. Further,the hotel development project's new on-site Sewage Treatment Plant ("STP") system will result in less nitrogen discharge than As-of-Right development. All other requisite municipal services are available to the property. The development project will be built in accordance with all requisite codes to ensure compliance with applicable fire and safety regulations.The existing development pattern is already established with commercial use along Main Road extending north to the railroad tracks. This pattern exists along the north side of Main Road in the vicinity of the property. Further, the site has been designed specifically to mitigate impacts to the adjoining residential properties to the east. This condition would exist whether it is an As-of-Right Development or the applicant's intended development of a hotel/restaurant. As depicted in the FEIS, the applicant's hotel development plan affords a better design for protecting residential homes to the east than the As- of-Right Plan. File No. 20-6000 Breslin Appraisal Co., Inc The contemplated use is appropriately located and meets the goals of the Hamlet study and updated Comprehensive Plan, providing potential for the increased pedestrian activity to help support local businesses, provide increased tourist dollars, increased jobs and substantial added tax revenue, all while maintaining the Hamlet character along Main Road. The applicant's development project will in no way prevent the use of adjoining properties or those in nearby zoning districts. Moreover, the applicant's intended hotel/restaurant use will not adversely impact property values in that it is a contemplated use and one expected to be located at this location. In conclusion, for all of the reasons outlined above and contained in the FEIS and the ZBA's SEQRA Findings Statement, I believe that this application meets the criteria under the Special Exception Permit standards of the Town Code. Respectfull ubmi ted, BI2FSLI APP ISAL CO., INC. r� re ' e� certified General Real Estate Appraiser New York Certificate#46000013641 JJB/mr File No. 20-6000 Breslin Appraisal Co., Inc 6 SUBJECT TAX MAP District 1000 Section 63 Block 3, Lot 15 "a� o =,x O b a d - + 4 5 _ 4 7 � M S •A OP 0� J1i `i Q a l v + File No. 20-6000 Breslin Appraisal Co., Inc c7 PHOTOS OF SUBJECT & SURROUNDING AREA was r f .mgr`.".... . U M1 �� Photo 1 West of the subject. F A', r y� Photo 2 Main Road looking east. File No. 20-6000 Breslin Appraisal Co., Inc l t Photo 3 Adjacent to subject. Photo 4 Opposite the subject. File No. 20-6000 Breslin Appraisal Co., Inc - • + fi.{� l'��`41 •'- � T�a�� �.y..�' FN `YR a ,b.. S'l7. } -',r� .. F2.� to•. A . i I / I • I/ I / 'I r � 1111 i .S. n~v' a C .awn.--.a, .•-+xn.�.�r_..i� 4+.. I I • �1 1/ / I 10 i w a� q y Photo 7 Subject along easterly line. � S:\ XT" r S i 4 Photo 8 Existing subject building. File No. 20-6000 Breslin Appraisal Co., Inc ✓����✓jl 11 .4 a A Y Y Photo 9 Subject east to west. N�ie��• Photo 10 Subject east side. File No. 20-6000 Breslin Appraisal Co., Inc 12 o. f Photo 11 Rear of subject. Photo 12 Subject looking to street from rear. File No. 20-6000 Breslin Appraisal Co., Inc 13 z r, rte. •' Sr Photo 13 Rear of existing structure. �s' K Y:. Photo 14 Doctors office opposite side,east of subject. File No. 20-6000 Breslin Appraisal Co., Inc 14 s� k:JT� � �✓ � I 14 Photo 15 Doctors office diagonally opposite. Photo 16 Residence east of subject File No. 20-6000 Breslin Appraisal Co., Inc 15 I i Photo 17 West of subject R . I; yks :w 1 Photo 18 Opposite subject to the west. File No. 20-6000 Breslin Appraisal Co., Inc i r 16 w Photoopposite r . � y �fFYy y q Photo Opposite I 17 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that Breslin Appraisal Company Inc., was employed to appraise the subject property: 1. Neither Breslin Appraisal Company Inc., nor I have a present or contemplated future interest in the property appraised herein. 2. The appraisal sets forth all conditions of the assignment, limiting or otherwise that have an effect on the opinions or analysis contained herein. These limitations may have been imposed by the terms of the assignment or by the undersigned (see Assumptions and Limiting Conditions). 3. No one other than the undersigned and the employees and staff of Breslin Appraisal Company provided any assistance in the preparation of this report. 4. Neither the employment to make this appraisal nor the compensation are contingent on the value reported or upon anything other than the delivery of this report. 5. My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the uniform Standards of Professional Practice. 6. No matter affecting the value of the subject location has been knowingly withheld or omitted by the Appraiser. 7. The subject property herein has been physically inspected by the undersigned or a staff person of the company. 8. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions and are my personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. 9. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the American Society of Appraisers (ASA) and the New York State Appraisal Board for review by their duly authorized representatives. BRESLIN ISAL CO. INC. Jo reslin;J"r: r esident Certified General Real Estate Appraiser New York Certificate#46000013641 File No. 20-6000 Breslin Appraisal Co., Inc - 18 JOAN J.BRESLIN,JR. QUALIFICATIONS EXPERIENCE Certified General Real Estate Appraiser,NYS License#46000013641;Licensed Real Estate Broker President-Breslin Appraisal Co.-a full service real estate company involved in the appraisal of all types of property in addition to sales,management,leasing,mortgaging,and consulting work. Attorney-Licensed to practice Law in the State of New York Former Assessor Village of Ocean Beach. EDUCATION J.D., St.John's University Law School B.B.A., Siena College,Loundonville,N.Y.Major-Accounting Society of Real Estate Appraisers,Course 101;Independent Fee Appraisers,Course 101 Various seminars,lectures,conferences on real estate appraising. Requisite courses for licensing,G-1,G-2,G-3, E/S. Long Island Real Estate Board,Broker's Course Long Island Builder's Institute,Fundamentals of Home Building. PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES Member,Long Island Board of Realtors Member,Long Island Board of Realtors,Appraisal Division Member,New York State Bar Member, Suffolk County Bar Association Member,American Society of Appraisers GENERAL Engaged in all forms of real property appraising including residential,commercial,industrial,and special purposes. Lecturer Suffolk County Bar Association on Zoning and Land Use. Guest Lecturer Touro Law School on Zoning and Land Use TESTIMONY Recognized as expert,Town of Huntington Zoning&Town Boards and Planning Boards Recognized as expert,Supreme Court,Nassau and Suffolk Counties Recognized as expert,Town of Brookhaven Zoning Board,Town Board and Planning Board Recognized as expert,Town of Islip Zoning Board and Planning Board Recognized as expert,Village of Asharoken Recognized as expert,Village of Rockville Centre Recognized as expert,Town of Smithtown Zoning Board,Planning Board,Town Board Recognized as expert,Town of Hempstead and North Hempstead Zoning Board,Town Board Recognized as expert,Town of Oyster Bay Town Board,ZBA Recognized as expert,Federal Court Recognized as expert,U.S.Bankruptcy Court Recognized as expert,Nassau and Suffolk Surrogates Court Recognized as expert,Town of Southold Recognized as expert,Town of Riverhead Recognized as expert,Village of Laurel Hollow Recognized as expert,Town of Oyster Bay Recognized as expert,Village of Cove Neck Recognized as expert,Town of East Hampton Recognized as expert,Town of Southampton Recognized as expert,Village of Muttontown Recognized as expert,Village of Brookville Recognized as expert,Village of Lynbrook Recognized as expert,Village of Malverne Recognized as expert,Village of Valley Stream File No. 20-6000 Breslin Appraisal Co., Inc ' RECEIVED (OCT � 20 1 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING October 14, 2021 #7046SE — The Enclaves, 56655 Main Road Southold Please print your name and address on the line(s) below We ask that you please limit your comments to five (5) minutes Thank_you I[[// AM E ADDRESS - A CAM -�- v t5 6k / �f 5 d,, AT I d RI r RECEIVED iocr 14 2021 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING - Ggp36 October 14, 2021 #7046SE — The Enclaves, 56655 Main Road Southold Please print your name and address on the line(s) below We ask that you please limit your comments to five (5) minutes Thank you NAME ADDRESS S}� ySL I le/KL �0- oL F�—0 4A) 1 I�tw00 oom—,&(Q--- 11� +7 n1F��Y L'U — ti - -- —�.. OCT to m:i r , reed Angelina&John McKenna 220 Mechanic Street Southold,New York ' October 14,2021 Southold Town Hall 56655 Main Road, Southold,NY Re: Zoning Board of Appeal on October 14, 2021 —5pm—Public Hearing of the Special Exception for the proposed Hotel and Restaurant,known as The Enclaves Ladies and Gentlemen: We are here to express our concern about the horrendous project being proposed. It will negatively impact our charming & historical community for various reasons but greatly for it's environmental impact. It will NOT enhance the Town of Southold. This is a Town which prides itself on it's heritage and a strong sense of community. Our roads cannot handle more traffic which this proposal will create, nor do we want more traffic in addition to what we already have. The surrounding area will be greatly affected by noise, pollution and an invasion of transient people. We definitely do not need a 40 room hotel, a 250 person indoor special events venue, 100 person small events venue restaurant,pool & spa, rooftop terrace, etc. AND a Beach shuttle to Founders Landing for guests only as stated in the outline in the New Suffolk News. Who will benefit from this horrendous outlandish proposal? The Investors and not the Town and citizens who live here. How dare they even suggest a bus shuttle to Founders Beach which is a small bay beach used by our local young families, mostly with small children and seniors within the Parks District. Clearly shows what little regard they have for our beautiful town and their residents in every aspect. Nor do they understand the dynamics which makes our Town so special. We cannot allow this proposal to rip the soul of our town apart and destroy everything that we love. We vehemently oppose this special exception. John & I moved to Southold almost 4 years ago and the reason why we chose this beautiful and peaceful town is under attack! Please do NOT let this happen. With Deepest Concern, f Angelina&John McKenna f October 1,2021 Town of Southold ; i Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals ' OCT 4 54375 Main Road wont, � „r P.O.Box 1179 l„ ��r�` Southold,New York 11471 arcl,or,gppeals.' Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit (the"Application")to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa ("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the ` "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: 1 I Edward Macari currently own the property located at 11155 Main Road Mattituck,New York 11952. 1 understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14, 2021, requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and [Uwe] support the Project i and ask that it be granted.The Project is a carefully considered,responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. I have reviewed (i) the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS"), prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final i Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and (iv) August 19, 2021, ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. I concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan.Further,the FEIS analyzed,in great detail, how the project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code.Therefore,as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS,I support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. 5 i I respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. 9 Thank you for your attention in this regard. a i a ` Very truly yours, Edward Vincent Macari ' 11155 Main Road Mattituck NY 11952 i P.O BOX 501 3 9 i V i 3 October 1,2021 t Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road I P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 ' : Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit (the "Application") to the Town of Southold (the "Town")Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") by 56655 Main Road i LLC ("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves i Hotel and Spa("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road,Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: We Joseph and Alexsandm Macari currently own the property located at 150 bergen avenue Mattituck NY 11952, also known as"MACARI VINEYARDS AND WINERY".We understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14,2021,requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and [I/we]support the Project and ask that it be granted.The Project is a carefully considered,responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. We have reviewed (i) the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS"), prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and Iasi revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and (iv) August 19, 2021, ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS.We concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further,the FEIS analyzed,in great detail, how the project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code.Therefore,as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and'adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS,We support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. We respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your ttention iA this regard. V y rs, i i r 1 3} Y 3� b p� L October 14, 2021 cd�S� Town of Southold 7ECERECEIVED Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road OCT 2021 i P.O. Box 1179Uiiiriy bird� od)y Southold, New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit(the "Application")to the Town of Southold (the"Town")Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") by 56655 Main Road LLC("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa ("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road,Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C.Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: I currently occupy the property located at 185 Willow Point Rd,Southold, New York 11971. 1 understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14, 2021, requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and I support the Project and ask that it be granted.The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. I have reviewed (i)the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS"), prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii)the Final Environmental Impact Statement, prepared by PW, dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and (iv)the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. I concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further,the HIS analyzed, in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code.Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, I support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. I respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours, Max Tibett 185 Willow Point Rd,Southold, NY 11971 Fuentes, Kim From: LINDA AURIEMMA <laurie6656@aol.com> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 3:52 PM OCT 15 2021 To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: Last Night 72(DNLf n�� �r, � n, � � Dear ZBA: I am very upset about being dropped from The Enclave hearing last night at approx. 8:00 pm, evidently along with all the other Zoom participants. Twice I asked Elizabeth to request that the hearing be paused until we could all rejoin but never received a response. At around 8:30-8:45, 1 was dropped from Zoom entirely after waiting & waiting to be reconnected. You all knew we had been kicked off. Did the hearing proceed without the approximately 60 attendees who had been participating via Zoom??? If so, I believe that is a serious violation as none of us on Zoom were afforded the opportunity to hear any of the remaining speakers, and Zoom participants who may have wanted to speak were denied the right to speak, as promised at the start of the hearing. Please advise me what transpired from 8:00 on. Was the hearing paused as it should have been? Will it be rescheduled? If not, how can those who were dropped hear/read the rest of the hearing & when it will be available to us? Thank you. Linda Auriemma 460 Fred St. New Suffolk Sent from my iPhone ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. Fuentes, Kim From: barbara pantino <barbara.bonannorealty@outlook.com> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 2:34 PM RIECUVE" To: Fuentes, Kim Cc: Travers, Kathleen QST � � 2021 Subject: Enclaves Meeting on October 13, 2021 BONING gOAR�OF APPEALS I was in attendance at the above meeting last night. To further my comments regarding the traffic study done in July of 2018 between Boisseau and Town Harbor Ln; it should be re-evaluated again since there has been a high influx of new homeowners and visitors to the area. I'm sure the Study will be much different now than when it was done. The traffic will back up from the light on Youngs, both east and west in direction and make it quite difficult to cross over from the South as well as the North. It's rather difficult now. Someone From NYS should do the study as it may be a case of installing a 4-way light at the entrance to the Enclaves off of Main Rd. Route 48 should also have a traffic study. Guests will be coming from the East and West turning down the side street to the Enclaves and make it quite impossible to cross over North and South. It's also rather difficult. A 4- way light should be considered there as well. Other than the 10 events that the presenters mentioned, there will also be guests from approximately May through November causing continued traffic. Nothing was mentioned the rooms will most likely have two queen beds, for 4 guests per room, which means 2 cars instead of one that is presumed. So, in essence, there could possibly be 176 guests and 88 cars. As far as the residential area I live in(Founders Landing), the Shuttle buses to the beach were never mentioned by the presenters. There will also be some guests that prefer taking their own cars. Where do they park? Along the roads in front of homeowner's home's. Founders landing beach is intimate. In high season it is filled with families and children near the playground. The East side of the Wharf House is a small strip of Beach which would end up being packed with people and may be partying with their Bluetooth speakers. There goes the charm and quiet of our little piece of heaven. No way will you be able to relax over a good book. Not to mention bathroom use and Septic's. The ice cream man comes every day to the beach for the children. Consider the danger for them with the traffic of Shuttles and cars. Where does the shuttle park for guest drop off and pickup? There will also be many guests that will be sightseeing through the neighborhood. There are children in the area riding their bikes, homeowners walking their dogs,teens playing whiffle ball and such. Not only would it create a feeling of lost privacy, it is dangerous for the area as well. We purchased our home here 16 years ago, for the peace and tranquility, the charm,the lifestyle,the dark skies, and out of the congestion of Nassau County. We will be losing all we moved out for with this special exemption. Respectfully Yours, Barbara Pantino 165 Lhommedieu Ln Southold i 516-578-3466 -- ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 2 RECEIVED OCT 2021 October 6,2021 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit (the "Application") to the Town of Southold(the"Town")Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: We currently own the property located at 1075 Smith Drive North, Southold, New York 11971. We understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14, 2021, requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and [I/we] support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. We have reviewed (i) the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS"), prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and (iv)the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. We concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further, the FEIS analyzed, in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, we support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. We respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours, C arles and Janet Tiranno 1075 Smith Drive North Southold,NY 11971 , To Zoning Board of Appeals OCT A 6 Public Hearing October 14, 2021 Zonir Bnafe By Town Code you have the power to review selected types of proposed land uses. "They require individual review to assure compatibility with existing land use patterns, community character and the natural environment." (Town Code 280-139) Consistent with this, there is a category of special exception uses. 280-140 ` =-- -� �s ro "No special exception approval shall be granted unless the Zoning Board of Appeals (p� ic� cq �w specifically finds and determines the following:" 280-142 rr LO ` rr� Q There follows general standards you must specifically find.for this project, such as c cz G "B. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties ..." - C. That the safety, the health, the welfare, the comfort, the convenience or the order of the Town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location." D. That the use will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes and intent of this chapter. E. That the use will be compatible with its surroundings and with the character of the neighborhood and of the community in general, particularly with regard to visibility, scale and overall appearance." Seems to me community character must be foremost in your consideration. In a discussion of the Comprehensive Plan our Supervisor Scott Russell, in reply to questions of the plan's relevance, if adopted to this project, emphasized your role. "There is no hard and fast rule as to whether something is to be consistent or inconsistent, the Zoning Board of Appeals and other Boards are going to determine what is the community standard meet, what is the community character? Is this plan that comes before us consistent with everybody's understanding of community character and community standards? 12/17/2019 cited on Town web site. This community expects that your judgment support the standards of the Southold Hamlet study; discussions led by Leslie Weisman when I attended. That study insists that development be within a small scale context that is in keeping with the Hamlet's tradition and historic setting. That study says that large scale also refers to intensity of use, evaluation of traffic generated, the nature of the intended market ( Le. targeting a larger market and not simply the hamlet itself). Surely this project is targeting a larger mark than Southold and in direct contravention of the Hamlet study. Another goal in that study. " control tourism so it does.not overwhelm the quality of life of year round residents". In order to approve the special use permit you must make a positive finding, specifically determining that it is consistent with Southold's community character. The opposition the Enclaves proposal has generated precludes this possibility as does common sense. Sally Kahn Bayview resident v - 50300 Main Road LLC 1f, PO Box 1355 IVa f Southold, New�Y rk 11971 r October 5 2021 0; ;-)41 t _ 'oning Boaro`of,4ppools .i Town of Southold ! `�gn rig of `S' Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road PO.Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit for the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa Dear Chairperson Weisman: I am an owner of the property located at 50300 Main Road, Southold. I have read and studied the latest documents on file for The Enclaves project, including ;s. Appendix I revised in July 2021 and the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS in August 2021. I have also spent some time researching and studying the firm responsible for the Appendix I report, PW Grosser Consulting. They have a stellar reputation on numerous projects throughout Long Island and New York State. I would therefore find their findings acceptable, thoughtful, and complete. I support the Project and ask that it be granted along with the Special Exception Use Permit. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that belongs in our Southold Business District. = I respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Respectfully, Paul J. Romanelli Delivered via email to kim.fuentes@town.southold.ny.us "" �'�""� OrT 15 2021 b i Attendee Report Report Generated: 10/15/20218:57 Topic Webinar ID Actual Start Time Actual Duration (minu# Registered Zoning Board of Appeals-C 856 6350 1095 10/14/202115:29 316 146 Host Details Attended User Name (Original Name) Email Join Time Leave Time Yes Town of Southold it2@southoldtownny.gov 10/14/202115:29 10/14/202120:04 Yes Town of Southold it2@southoldtownny.gov 10/14/202120:29 10/14/202120:30 Panelist Details Attended User Name (Original Name) Email Join Time Leave Time Yes Skip Albertson albertsonfamilyl@msn.com 10/14/202118:43 10/14/202118:53 Yes Kim Fuentes kimbyll952@gmail.com 10/14/202115:43 10/14/202115:45 Yes Kim Fuentes kimbyll952@gmail.com 10/14/202120:07 10/14/202120:29 Yes Elizabeth Sakarellos (Donna Westermar donnaw@southoldtownny.gov 10/14/202115:37 10/14/202120:44 Yes Paul Romanelli paul@suffolksecurity.com 10/14/202119:54 10/14/202120:00 Yes joycebeckenstein joybeck@optonline.net 10/14/202118:36 10/14/202118:46 Yes sally Kahn sallyfrank@gmail.com 10/14/202118:38 10/14/202118:47 Yes Anne annemurray@optonline.net 10/14/202119:05 10/14/202119:09 Yes ConorHarrigan ctharrig@gmail.com 10/14/202119:17 10/14/202119:26 Yes Margaret de Cruz mrdecruz@gmail.com 10/14/202120:00 10/14/202120:44 Yes Michael Conklin norforker@gmail.com 10/14/202120:03 10/14/202120:03 Yes Michael Conklin norforker@gmail.com 10/14/202120:03 10/14/202120:05 Yes Michael Conklin norforker@gmail.com 10/14/202120:05 10/14/202120:05 Yes Michael Conklin norforker@gmail.com 10/14/202120:05 10/14/202120:06 Yes Michael Conklin norforker@gmail.com 10/14/202120:06 10/14/202120:08 Yes Michael Conklin norforker@gmail.com 10/14/202120:07 10/14/202120:07 Yes Michael Conklin norforker@gmail.com 10/14/202120:07 10/14/202120:07 Yes Michael Conklin norforker@gmail.com 10/14/202120:07 10/14/202120:07 Yes Michael Conklin norforker@gmail.com 10/14/202120:07 10/14/202120:44 Yes Sharon smchugh@optonline.net 10/14/202119:17 10/14/202119:17 Yes Sharon smchugh@optonline.net 10/14/202119:17 10/14/202119:20 Yes Joe Finora jfinora@sheiterislandtown.us 10/14/202118:57 10/14/202118:59 Attendee Details Attended User Name (Original Name) First Name Last Name Email .C' -- ..T Yes JoAnne Maddalena JoAnne Maddalena jamquilt@optonline.net Yes ga ry ga ry gary@ericsunwest.com Yes victoria victoria vwither@aol.com Yes Ms. Williams Ms. Williams Jwilliams@pwgrosser.com Yes Ms. Williams Ms. Williams Jwilliams@pwgrosser.com Yes Ms. Williams Ms. Williams Jwilliams@pwgrosser.com Yes Bob DeLuca#Group for the East End Bob DeLuca, Group for the bdeluca@eastendenvironmen Yes Bob DeLuca#Group for the East End Bob DeLuca, Group for the bdeluca@eastendenvironmen Yes Kevin Kevin Kevsantos256@gmail.com Yes Kevin Kevin Kevsantos256@gmail.com Yes Lauren Lauren standi4@optonline.net Yes Lauren Lauren standi4@optonline.net Yes Maureen CLANCY Maureen CLANCY pandm225@optonline.net Yes John Castiglione John Castiglione jdcastiglione@hotmail.com Yes Lucille Jones Lucille Jones jonesdle@aol.com Yes Trina Trina trinaw@optonline.net Yes MONICA ALTMANN MONICA _ALTMANN monica.altmann@elliman.con Yes Krys Krys kd2090@nyu.edu Yes Krys Krys kd2090@nyu.edu Yes Krys Krys kd2090@nyu.edu Yes Krys Krys kd2090@nyu.edu Yes Abby Abby gcr0202@gmail.com Yes Lisa Roselli Lisa Roselli lnr0206@gmail.com Yes Lisa Roselli Lisa Roselli Inr0206@gmail.com Yes Lisa Roselli Lisa Roselli Inr0206@gmail.com Yes Skip Albertson Skip Albertson albertsonfamilyl@msn.com Yes Skip Albertson Skip Albertson albertsonfamilyl@msn.com Yes Greg Doroski gregdoroski Greg@southoldforward.com Yes Greg Doroski gregdoroski Greg@southoldforward.com Yes gregdoroski gregdoroski Greg@southoldforward.com Yes derwood kirkwood derwood kirkwood derwoodkirkwood@gmail.con Yes derwood kirkwood derwood kirkwood derwoodkirkwood@gmail.con Yes derwood kirkwood derwood kirkwood derwoodkirkwood@gmail.con Yes Robert Bohn Robert Bohn Rbohn40@gmail.com r K dT Yes Mary B. Mary B. maarybertschi@gmail.com Yes Charles Sherman Charles Sherman cssherman@gmail.com Yes Rick B Rick B richardb26@yahoo.com Yes Josh Josh jvoegelin@gmail.com No Nina Neimark Nina Neimark pneimark@hotmail.com Yes John DAngelo John DAngelo johnda1237@hotmail.com Yes Mike Rose Mike Rose mike@bogeysny.com Yes Mike Rose Mike Rose mike@bogeysny.com Yes Richard Richard Sowhat1638@yahoo.com Yes Richard Richard Sowhat1638@yahoo.com Yes Richard Richard Sowhatl638@yahoo.com Yes Richard Richard Sowhat1638@yahoo.com Yes Diane McConnell Diane McConnell dmm007@hotmaii.com Yes jss jss jsayage@brownaltman.com Yes Margaret Cleary Margaret Cleary mocleary@aol.com Yes Margaret Cleary Margaret Cleary mocleary@aol.com Yes Robin Kkotz Robin Kkotz bobshellr@gmail.com Yes drianne benner drianne benner driannebenner@att.net Yes Lucy Cutler Lucy Cutler lucindacutler@icloud.com Yes Sandra Benedetto Sandra Benedetto smbenedetto73@gmail.com Yes paulschwartz paulschwartz glassales@aol.com No Michelle Michelle starfish719@aol.com Yes Paul Romanelli Paul Romanelli paul@suffolksecurity.com Yes Paul Romanelli Paul Romanelli paul@suffolksecurity.com Yes Anne Surchin Anne Surchin surchin@mac.com Yes Richard Stauffer Richard Stauffer info@hanfra.com Yes Lynda Lynda lbage@slic.com Yes sandra sandra sandrayslaw@outlook.com No Jeanne Jeanne jeanne.fallot.11@gmail.com Yes John Frohnhofer John john@frohnhoferusa.com Yes John John john@frohnhoferusa.com Yes Linda Auriemma Linda Auriemma laurie6656@aol.com Yes Stephen Amiaga Stephen Amiaga steve@amiaga.com Yes jamey tibett Jamey Tibett jamey@precisionstone.net W -. '1 Yes Jamey Tibett Jamey Tibett jamey@precisionstone.net Yes Jamey Tibett Jamey Tibett jamey@precisionstone.net Yes Liz Gillooly Liz Gillooly lizgillooly@gmail.com Yes Beth Wittenberg Beth Wittenberg Bgwittenberg@gmail.com Yes K Helinski K Helinski khelinski2002@yahoo.com Yes K Helinski K Helinski khelinski2002@yahoo.com Yes K Helinski K Helinski khelinski2002@yahoo.com Yes K Helinski K Helinski khelinski2002@yahoo.com Yes kathy kathy relaks45@optonline.net Yes Steph Gaylor Steph Gaylor steph@invinciblesummerfarm Yes Eileen Sayre Eileen Sayre emds5263@yahoo.com Yes Nicole Nicole B Nicole25@gmail.com Yes Nicole B Nicole B Nicole25@gmail.com Yes Nicole Nicole B Nicole25@gmail.com Yes Nicole B Nicole B Nicole25@gmail.com Yes Allan Wexler Allan Wexler wexleral@newschool.edu Yes Allan Wexler Allan Wexler wexleral@newschool.edu Yes Aurelie Lang Aurelie Lang aureIie.[ang50@gmaiI.com Yes Aurelie Lang Aurelie Lang aurelie.lang50@gmail.com Yes Susan Susan sptyler67@gmail.com Yes melissa spiro melissa spiro melspiro@optonline.net Yes Eric Sepenoski--Candidate for Town Tru Eric Sepenoski--Candidate ericsepenoski@gmail.com Yes Eric Sepenoski--Candidate for Town Tru Eric Sepenoski--Candidate ericsepenoski@gmail.com Yes Eric Sepenoski--Candidate for Town Tru Eric Sepenoski--Candidate ericsepenoski@gmail.com Yes Eric Sepenoski--Candidate for Town Tru Eric Sepenoski--Candidate ericsepenoski@gmail.com Yes Lisa Finn Lisa Finn Lisa.Finn@patch.com Yes Lisa Finn Lisa Finn Lisa.Finn@patch.com Yes Lisa Finn Lisa Finn Lisa.Finn@patch.com Yes Lisa Finn Lisa Finn Lisa.Finn@patch.com Yes Lisa Finn Lisa Finn Lisa.Finn@patch.com Yes Lisa Finn Lisa Finn Lisa.Finn@patch.com Yes Lisa Finn Lisa Finn Lisa.Finn@patch.com Yes Hazel Kahan Hazel Kahan hazelkahan@me.com Yes Hazel Kahan Hazel Kahan hazelkahan@me.com MI _ I Yes aucelegre aucelegre aucelegre@gmail.com Yes Andy Andy Atarshisl9@gmail.com Yes Catherine WESCHLER Catherine WESCHLER ccweschler@gmail.com Yes Mel Mel mmorris@bnl.gov Yes ellenmcneilly ellenmcneilly ejmcneilly@earthlink.net Yes joycebeckenstein joycebeckenstein joybeck@optonline.net Yes joycebeckenstein joycebeckenstein joybeck@optonline.net Yes sally Kahn sally Kahn sallyfrank@gmail.com Yes sally Kahn sally Kahn sallyfrank@gmail.com Yes michael mcallister michael mcallister mcallistermichael33@gmail.cc Yes Susan Kujawski Susan Kujawski Susiek64@optonline.net Yes Susan Kujawski Susan Kujawski Susiek64@optonline.net Yes Susan Kujawski Susan Kujawski Susiek64@optonline.net Yes Susan Kujawski Susan Kujawski Susiek64@optonline.net Yes Karin Constant Karin Constant kconstant@optonline.net Yes Hgwaslo Hgwaslo Hgwaslo@gmail.com Yes Lily Lily lilydj@gmail.com Yes nancylieberman nancylieberman ms.nancylieberman@gmail.co Yes Patricia dzenkowski Patricia dzenkowski Patd410@optonline.net Yes Patricia dzenkowski Patricia dzenkowski Patd410@optonline.net Yes Patricia dzenkowski Patricia dzenkowski Patd410@optonline.net Yes Patricia dzenkowski Patricia dzenkowski Patd410@optonline.net Yes Anne Anne annemurray@optonline.net Yes Anne Anne annemurray@optonline.net Yes Robert Dunn Robert Dunn dunn3809@aol.com Yes mary mary pbmary@optimum.net Yes john carter john carter 6096333@gmail.com Yes Collette Clayton Collette Clayton colletterc7@gmail.com Yes Collette Clayton Collette Clayton colletterc7@gmail.com Yes Phil Phil philipwasilausky@yahoo.com Yes Phil Phil philipwasilausky@yahoo.com Yes Phil Phil philipwasilausky@yahoo.com Yes Phil Phil philipwasilausky@yahoo.com Yes Jessica Jessica Jessicamichaelisl@hotmail.co 7— Yes Katelyn Kaim Katelyn Kaim kkaim@pwgrosser.com Yes Glenn Glenn goldsboat@aol.com Yes Lisa Aviles Lisa Aviles laavilesll5@yahoo.com Yes Lisa Aviles Lisa Aviles laavilesll5@yahoo.com Yes Lisa Aviles Lisa Aviles laavilesll5@yahoo.com Yes Lisa Aviles Lisa Aviles laavilesll5@yahoo.com Yes Lisa Aviles Lisa Aviles laaviles115@yahoo.com Yes Lisa Aviles Lisa Aviles laaviles115@yahoo.com Yes Lisa Aviles Lisa Aviles laavilesll5@yahoo.com Yes Lisa Aviles Lisa Aviles laavilesll5@yahoo.com Yes Lisa Aviles Lisa Aviles laavilesll5@yahoo.com Yes Lisa Aviles Lisa Aviles laavilesll5@yahoo.com Yes Lisa Aviles Lisa Aviles laavilesll5@yahoo.com Yes kevin kevin kevin@peconicholdings.com Yes kevin kevin kevin@peconicholdings.com Yes andrea aurichio Andrea Aurichio ajaurichio@gmail.com Yes Andrea Aurichio Andrea Aurichio ajaurichio@gmail.com Yes DS DS ds@gmail=com Yes TIRANCHI TIRANCHI charlie.tiranno@novartis.com Yes Mike Mike Mikesande@iCloud.com Yes Councilwoman Sarah Nappa Councilwoman Sarah Nappa southoldforsarah@gmail.com Yes Mary McTigue Mary McTigue themarye@optonline.net Yes Louisa Hargrave Louisa Hargrave louisahargravel@icloud.com Yes Louisa Hargrave Louisa Hargrave louisahargravel@icloud.com Yes Judith Alpert Judith Alpert jalpert@edf.org Yes Rich Rich richmullen@mullenmotors.co Yes Sarah Nappa Sarah Nappa sarahnappa@me.com Yes ConorHarrigan ConorHarrigan ctharrig@gmail.com Yes ConorHarrigan ConorHarrigan ctharrig@gmail.com Yes Hazel Kahan Hazel Kahan kahan.hazel@gmail.com Yes Hazel Kahan Hazel Kahan kahan.hazel@gmail.com Yes Margaret de Cruz Margaret de Cruz mrdecruz@gmail.com Yes Ea12598 Ea12598 Ea12598@optonline.net Yes Carolyn Bennett Carolyn Bennett caroleee@gmail.com Yes Carolyn Bennett Carolyn Bennett caroleee@gmail.com Yes Carolyn Bennett Carolyn Bennett caroleee@gmail.com Yes Michael Conklin Michael Conklin norforker@gmail.com Yes Michael Conklin Michael Conklin norforker@gmail.com Yes B Bennett B Bennett bencarolyn@gmail.com Yes Harold Syms Harold Syms haroldsyms@gmail.com Yes paul paul unsublux8@aol.com Yes Amanda Abraham (She/her) Amanda Abraham (She/her) aabraham@peconiclandtrust. Yes mary mary mcharters@mufsd.com Yes Virginia Virginia Bonjour40@aol.com Yes Virginia Virginia Bonjour40@aol.com Yes Virginia Virginia Bonjour40@aol.com Yes Virginia Virginia Bonjour40@aol.com Yes Virginia Virginia Bonjour40@aol.com Yes LS LS Jnlshare@gmail.com Yes robin phillips robin phillips phillipsrobin59@gmail.com Yes Sharon Sharon smchugh@optonline.net Yes Sharon Sharon smchugh@optonline.net Yes Sharon Sharon smchugh@optonline.net Yes Brooks Family Brooks Family Casa Brooks@Gmail.com Yes Rebecca Morrow Rebecca Morrow rebecca.morrow88@gmail.coi Yes Rebecca Morrow Rebecca Morrow rebecca.morrow88@gmail.cor Yes Jenn Hartnagel Jenn Hartnagel jhartnagel@eastendenvironm Yes Susan Susan scap621@gmail.com Yes Sergio Zori Sergio Zori szori@aol.com Yes Nicolas Geeraerts Nicolas Geeraerts ngeeraerts@gmail.com Yes John Fischetti John Fischetti jfischetti@boomagers.com Yes Joe Finora Joe Finora jfinora@shelterislandtown.us Yes Joe Finora Joe Finora jfinora@shelterislandtown.us Yes barbara barbara barbara@weilfriedmanarchite Yes kathleen m.travers kathleen m. travers kathleen.travers@elliman.con Yes jeffreyseibel jeffreyseibel jeffrey.seibel@gmail.com Yes jeffreyseibel jeffreyseibel jeffrey.seibel@gmail.com Yes Tony M Tony M mattessich@gmail.com Yes roseann burns roseann burns burnsroseann@gmail.com Yes Larry Jungblut Larry Jungblut jajungbl@optonline.net Yes Tony Tony anthonynappawines@gmail.a Yes Charles Tiranno Charles Tiranno ctiranno@optonline.net No Demi Demi Demi@arc-jobs.com Yes Lynne Norman Lynne Norman Lnormandia@aol.com Yes Lynne Norman Lynne Norman Lnormandia@aol.com Yes Roger Smith Roger Smith smith@bbsarch.com Q Yes paula didonato paula didonato paulagivingroom@gmail.com Yes paula didonato paula didonato paulagivingroom@gmail.com Yes paula didonato paula didonato paulagivingroom@gmail.com Yes paula didonato paula didonato paulagivingroom@gmail.com Yes paula didonato paula didonato paulagivingroom@gmail.com Yes Conrad Obregon Conrad Obregon cj@cjobregon.com Yes Dan Goodwin Dan Goodwin dangoodwinbsme@gmail.corr Yes Dan Goodwin Dan Goodwin dangoodwinbsme@gmail.com Yes Carolyn McCall Carolyn McCall cmcca112@mac.com Yes Cynthia Mignone Cynthia Mignone cmig66@optonline.net Yes Merve Jones Merve Jones bodybymery@gmail.com Yes Merve Merve Jones bodybymery@gmail.com Yes Merve Jones Merve Jones bodybymery@gmail.com Yes Anita Albertson Anita Albertson brownhouse22@verizon.net Yes Zoom user Zoom user svr9wjbmyj@privaterelay.app Yes . Zoom user Zoom user svr9wjbmyj@privaterelay.app Yes Candace Hall Candace Hall ms.candacehall@gmail.com Yes triciamoriarty triciamoriarty tricia.moriartyl@gmail.com Yes ellen ellen ellenwexler@gmail.com Yes Cynthia Ickes Cynthia Ickes cynickes@yahoo.com Yes Cynthia Ickes Cynthia Ickes cynickes@yahoo.com Yes Don Don dwilski78@gmail.com Yes Claude Solnik Claude Solnik claudesolnik@gmail.com Yes Lauren barry Lauren barry Lbarry@project-plant.com Yes Brian Cummings Brian Cummings briancummings631@gmail.co Yes Brian Cummings Brian Cummings briancummings631@gmail.coi Yes jdonadic jdonadic johnny@donadic.com Yes jdonadic jdonadic johnny@donadic.com Yes jdonadic jdonadic johnny@donadic.com Yes jdonadic jdonadic johnny@donadic.com Yes jdonadic jdonadic johnny@donadic.com Yes jdonadic jdonadic johnny@donadic.com Yes jdonadic jdonadic johnny@donadic.com Yes jdonadic jdonadic johnny@donadic.com October 10, 2021 L Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Z-6ning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for'a Special Exception Use Permit(the"Application")to the Town of Southold (the"Town") Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant")in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold,New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the"Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: ,Sandra Erickson-currently owns the property located at 1045 Budds Pond Road, Southold,New York 11971. 1 understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14, 2021,requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and I support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered,responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. [I/We] have reviewed(i)the Draft Environmental Impact Statement("DEIS"),prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"),dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii)the Final Environmental Impact Statement-,prepared by PW, dated April 2020, and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"),including,the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and (iv)the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. I concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted'Comprehensive Plan. Further, the FEIS analyzed,in great detail,how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code, Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, I support the issuance of the ,Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. I,respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours, Sandra Erickson 1045 Budds Pond Road,Southold, NY 11971 f � October 9,2021 Town oESouthoid � Chairperson Weisman arid the Members of the Zoning Board of Aipp,--!bWrj 54375 Main � ad _q 8ard P 0 Box 11 S uthold,N 9oYork 11971 '� () IS i Re- Application for a Special Exception Use Perinrt(the"'Application"�)to the own ` of Southold(the"Town")Zoning Boardol`Appeais("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC("Applicant")in connection-with the proposed development of the Enclaves I Intel and Spa("i?roject")at the property located at 56655 Main Road,Southold, New York 11971 alk/a S C Tax Map Identification No..1000.63-3-15(the "Property") Dear Chairperson Weinman• I am the Executive Director/Firmly Operating Ownier of The Preston house&Hotel at 428 E Main Street,Riverhead,Now York 11901, I understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14, 2021,requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Protect and[we]support the Project and ask that it be granted The Project is a carefully considered responsible development that is needed in the'fow'n's business disti iet I have reviewed(i)the Draft Environmental Impact Statement("DEIS"),prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting,Inc ("PW"),dated April 2019,and last revised October 2019,(ii)the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021("FEIS"). including the,Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix I(ni)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan("Comprehensive Pian"),adopted-in November 2020 and(tv)the August 19,2021 Z.BA Resoluli&n accepting the FEIS [I]concur with the ZBA's adoption of the DEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan Further,the FEIS analyzed,in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exceplion,Usc Permit pursuant to the`fow71 otSouthold Code 'therefore;,as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use`Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEiS,[I]Support the issuance,of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. I respectfully request that dais Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter Thank you for yom attention in this regard, Best, Jermiter PetroeeIli l48 E M air Street, Riverhead,IVY 11901 Fuentes, Kim From: Taylor Vecsey <tvecsey@danspapers.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 12:35 PM � '`�� To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: [SPAM] -The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant q, Hi, Kim. s Taylor Vecsey here at Behind The Hedges, the real estate magazine, associated with Dan's Papers. I am interested in reporting on the proposal for The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant. Is it at all possible to get any part of the application/rendering PDFs emailed to me? Thanks for your help, Taylor Taylor K. Vecsey Editor in Chief BehindTheHedges.com (631) 702-3199 Sign up for our email newsletters: Behind The Hedges and Dan's Papers EMAIL CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.Any review,transmission,dissemination or other use of,or taking of any action in reliance upon,this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.If you received this email in error,please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. 1 / 1 _ Fuentes, Kim From: khgillette <khgillette@yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2021 1:25 PM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: [SPAM] - Enclaves I SV �CO� Please do not approve this proposal as currently presented. It should be scaled down significantly so as to minimize the risk to the community. Main concerns are the fragile aquifer,traffic, negative impact to our beaches and rural quality of life for Southold residents.This has disaster written all over it! Sent from my Verizon,Samsung Galaxy smartphone OCT 18 2021 I _ t � I Fuentes, Kim From: Anita Albertson <brownhouse22@verizon.net> �( Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2021 3:03 PM To: Fuentes, Kim l( Cc: Anita Albertson -- Subject: Comment on the Enclaves North Fork, NY-Following • My Communities f _ FoNorth Fork, NY .-.._; t?�r ,Rt� ,,�,�w,f ,��� xo Follow more communities ------------- 680E- Ne b `-680FNearb o Southampton, NY o Riverhead, NY i o Westhampton-Hampton Bays, NY o East Hampton, NY o Clinton, CT 3 o Essex-Chester-Deep River, CT o Madison, CT ( o The Lymes, CT ' o Guilford, CT I i o Center Moriches-Eastport, NY i • Local News o Coronavirus i o Community Corner o Crime & Safety o Politics & Government j o Schools o Traffic&Transit o Obituaries ! o Personal Finance j o Seasonal & Holidays o Weather o Arts & Entertainment o Business o Health & Fitness o Home & Garden o Sports 3 o Travel E o Kids & Family 1 o Pets o Restaurants & Bars o Local Directory o LocalStream s • Neighbor Posts • Local Marketplace • Calendar • Real Estate • Advertise 1 This past was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the authors owr - act Dear Zoning Board, I attended the Southold Town Board Meeting this evening discussing the Special Exception application for the claves. Issues were raised about its appropriateness for the hamlet of Southold, the infrastructure supports like emergency services, traffic, noise, beach usage, affordable housing for those working at the Enclaves. Issues that weigh the balance between benefit and detriment for the local residents and the town's economy. The corporation did a decent fob of trying to address the concerns that were raised. The mock up pictures look pleasant enough, if not also like a fairy tale (roof top dining? not in the pictures. Lots of parking? not in the pictures. On paper the models and the accommodations look hopeful, if not realistic. Time will tell if it thrives or falls empty like the Shady Lady Inn or Caci restaurant. It makes me sad on a couple of fronts: (1) the environment of the North Fork (2) the town's economy (3) the safety and quality of life of the folks that live in Southold The environment: (1) The North Fork is dependent on an aquifer of fresh water floating on top of brackish salt water. A business of this magnitude with its food prep, linens to wash, spas and pools to fill and chlorinate, run off from the pavement that covers the parking areas will stress the area. The beaches this past summer were inundated with day visitors and their trash. How will they be assessed a fair cost for wear and tear on the beaches, the parks, the roads? The town's economy. (2)44 rooms- 80-100 visitors at capacity, restaurant dining for another 75 people, up to 250 people for special events plus all the folks supporting the place to make that happen. The chambermaids, waiters, maintenance folks, landscapers, hospitality crew will add an additional loading. Where do those folks live? In Southold's abundant affordable housing? Or are they coming from up Island adding traffic on a daily basis as they come to work?Where will they park?What mode of transportation will they use? 2 Maybe the visitors drive to Greenport or walk to the couple of shops in downtown Southold and maybe they spend money --that could be a good thing - but will they spend enough to allow local workers to live well in Southold'? lbq�56 But what of the of the staff? if there are already help wanted signs up in the other restaurants and hotels/motel/vineyards- where will the help come from? Robbing Peter to pay Paul?Will the Enclaves offer benefits? housing? health insurance? Safety and Quality of Life (3)What happeri-wheri the frehouse gets scall?*-,how.do_we envision the small'town volunteer fi°re department members°;negotiate the added traffic?,(if I recall the firehouses are desperate for more members....) Imagine: someone heading west from the 7-11 and also tourists coming out of the Enclaves-who don't know about volunteer fire departments --planning to take their left hand turns to Greenport while at the same time beach goers coming from Town Harbor Lane wait to turn left toward Southold village. Picture all the volunteers aiming to speed through traffic to respond to a fire---blue lights in regular cars prompting people to move to let them through -- but now you have people who know nothing of volunteer fire departments-impatient with what is already slow traffic-whols' 'I e might be put°at risk? A smaller scale operation might be manageable. This just seems too big, too problematic, too potentially dangerous. Respectfully submitted, Anita Lynne Albertson (I am a Sterling Baby- born in Greenport My brother and I maintain one apartment and rent a second apartment out at Colonial Village. My full time residence is Maryland ) ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 3 Fuentes, Kim From: Lauren Parker <laurenparker7@gmail.com> ECC-ntiFED Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 4:05 PM To: Fuentes, Kim OCT 19 2021 Subject: [SPAM] - Hotel in Southold ZONING CO IRD OF APPEAL:: Hi, I am writing to express my disgust over this big hotel that might end up at the end of my street!! 1 live on Town Harbor Lane, and like to sit on my porch in the summer and watch families pull little kids on Fed wagons down to our sleepy little beach. It's a small town feel and I love it. Southold is a quaint, little town and this proposed hotel is everything that is wrong with development! It is not taking into account the flavor of the neighborhood, much of which consists of older retirees,young families with young kids, and rentees looking to escape the bustle of the City! I understand there is a vote to give the developers an exception?Why? Bad for the town, bad for everyone! Vote no!! Lauren Lauren Parker Writer I Editor I Content Developer LAUREN PARKER CREATIVE MEDIA 646-337-8933 www.laurenparkercreative.com lauren parker7(c.gmail.com follow me (cD-laurenparker77 i t � _ I Fuentes, Kim From: Adam Irving <adamjirving@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 10:26 AM / To: Fuentes, Kim; Fuentes, Kim 1 ')0 Subject: comment on Enclaves application L--- I have worked on the Southold Town Aviation Noise Committee since 2014 and have learned a considerable amount about noise measurement and mitigation strategies. The Enclaves as currently proposed will be a significant noise generator and lower quality of life for nearby residents. Things like vegetative buffers,stockade fences,waist height noise walls will accomplish little to nothing. They sound nice but do not stand up to basic sound science. Sound, like air or water,will exploit any gap and continue its travels. The notion that outdoor amplified music will only be 5 decibels above the ambient noise level will never work, much less be measurable. Further decibel readers do not capture the low end bass which travels the furthest and causes the most irritation. What do you hear when a car with windows shut blares music? The bass. Why do you hear large boat engine noise miles away? The bass. This project is way out of scale for Southold Town and the inevitable steady stream of large party type events will be nothing but a nuisance for nearby residents. Southold government must ensure all residents their right to peaceful enjoyment of their homes. Adam Irving Orient, NY ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. i l OCT 2®2� 1 From: Anita Lynne Albertson 3114 Brooklawn Terrace OCT P. ?02s Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815 Andn� Colonial Village Younges #7 ti��� Southold NY 10K l To: Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 October 14, 2021 Dear Zoning Board, I attended the Southold Town Board Meeting this evening discussing the Special Exception application for the Enclaves (via Zoom). Issues were raised about its appropriateness for the hamlet of Southold, the infrastructure supports like emergency services, traffic, noise, beach usage, affordable housing for those working at the Enclaves. Issues that weigh the balance between benefit and detriment for the local residents and the town's economy. The corporation did a decent job of trying to address the concerns that were raised. The mock up pictures look pleasant enough, if not also like a fairy tale (roof top dining? not in the pictures. Lots of parking? not in the pictures.) On paper the models and the accommodations look hopeful, if not realistic. Time will tell if it thrives or falls empty like the Shady Lady Inn or Caci restaurant. It makes me sad on a couple of fronts: (1) the environment of the North Fork (2) the town's economy (3) the safety and quality of life of the folks that live in Southold The Environment. (1) The North Fork is dependent on an aquifer of fresh water floating on top of brackish salt water. A business of this magnitude with its food prep, linens to wash, spas and pools to fill and chlorinate, and run off from the pavement that covers the parking areas will stress the area. '1,�, o / The beaches this past summer were inundated with day visitors and their trash. How J will they be assessed a fair cost for wear and tear on the beaches, the parks, the roads? Southold Town's Economy. (2) 44 rooms - 80-100 visitors at capacity, restaurant dining for another 75 people, up to 250 people for special events plus all the folks supporting the place to make that happen. The chambermaids, waiters, maintenance folks, landscapers, hospitality crew will add an additional loadina. Where do those folks live? In Southold's abundant affordable housing? Or are they coming from up Island adding traffic on a daily basis as they come to work? Where will they park? What mode of transportation will they use? Maybe the visitors drive to Greenport or walk to the couple of shops in downtown Southold and maybe they spend money -- that could be a good thing. Will they spend enough to benefit the local townspeople who live in Southold? What of the staff? if there are already help wanted signs up in the other restaurants and hotels/motel/vineyards - where will the help come from? Robbing Peter to pay Paul? Will the Enclaves offer benefits? housing? health insurance? Safety and Quality of Life (3) What happens when the firehouse gets a call? - how do we envision the small-town volunteer fire department members_ negotiate the added traffic?' (If I recall correctly, the firehouses are desperate for more members....) Imagine: Some car heading west from the 7-11 and other cars of tourists coming out of the Enclaves-who don't know about volunteer fire departments --planning to take their left hand turns to Greenport while at the same time beach goers coming from Town Harbor Lane wait to turn left toward Southold village. Picture all the fire department volunteers aiming to speed through traffic to get to the firehouse to prepare to respond to a fire ---blue lights in regular cars prompting people to move to let them through -- but now you have people who know nothing of volunteer fire departments-impatient with what is already slow traffic- Whose life might be_put_at.risk? A smaller scale operation might be manageable. This just seems too big, too problematic, too potentially dangerous. Respectfully submitted Anita Lynne Albert n (I am a Sterling/Stirling Baby - born in Greenport- side by side with 3 kids I graduated SHS with). My brother and I maintain one apartment and rent out a second apartment at Colonial Village. My full time residence is Maryland.) Fuentes, Kim From: Jeanine <rkr@cox.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 5:15 PM To: Fuentes, Kim # Subject: [SPAM] - Enclaves project Hello -- - _ - We wanted to submit a formal comment regarding the proposed Enclaves project. We are homeowners in Southold and vehemently oppose the project. We purchased our home two years ago and upon purchase, we paid an additional $14,000.00 to the Peconic Land Trust. As we understand, and as per their website states, the purpose of this trust is to: " ... conserve Long Island's working farms, natural lands, and heritage for our communities now and in the future." That said, we believe the Land Trust helps Southold to maintain a sense of "small town community" that will surely be diminished by the increased commercialization this project will force upon its residents. When we bought our home, we were not given a choice in paying this hefty fee, yet we gladly did so in order to ensure our beautiful town would be protected from increased commercialization. Southold residents pride themselves on the quaint, country feel of our town. In fact, that is exactly what drew us to Southold above any other town on the North Fork. Rooftop decks and venues for large affairs do not fit into our our daily lives nor do they fit into our bucolic setting. This project does not belong in Southold. It is better suited for a more commercial area such as Greenport or the South Fork. Therefore, we urge you to reject this plan and help ensure our town maintains its peaceful and pastoral character. Best, Jeanine Fitzgerald Richard Rogg 285 Ripple Water Lane PO Box 364 Southold, NY 11971 i OCT 2 2 2021 � A �— —oz, �a (�c�� oho ✓mac-cam. � �`-`- ��/r i • s --- RECEIVED lt��Jcc 6 OCT 2 5 2021 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS October 1,2021 Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit(the "Application")to the Town of Southold(the"Town")Zoning Board ofAppeals("ZBA")by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant")in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa("Project")at the property located at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C. Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: 2iSS wo4-ttP,o6rit,1P- cj�'Z [I/We] currently [own/occupy] the property located at M SquWd, New York 1,W71. [I/We]understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA on October 14, 2021,requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and R/we] support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district: [I/We]have reviewed(i)the Draft Environmental Impact Statement("DEIS"),prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii) the Final Environmental Impact Statement,prepared by PW,dated April 2020,and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and(iv)the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. [I/we] concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further,the FEIS analyzed,in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, [I/We] support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. [I/We]respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Very truly yours, [Name] [Address] SZ 2, vtR(e, ilk C RECEIVED IM10=679 I—1—N OCT 25 2021 Ho.E II.—s.. M,Rd ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Who determines what homes are on the list? How is this project in any way appropriate to the goals of historic preservation? 2. They proposed to buffer the noise generated from the property by planting trees around the perimeter, after they knock down all the existing trees to build the hotel. There will be a rooftop lounge, which will undoubtedly be lit, contributing to light pollution. Noise from the lounge will most assuredly be carried above the trees.They estimated that the decibel level would be low (which I don't understand how that can be predicted since humans are unknown variables) 3. There will be a large paved parking lot to accommodate guests. Did the planners take into account where employees would park? The traffic report was conducted in 2018 before the covid exodus. There is a shortage of workers who live in the area, due to the high cost of housing which indicates that many will be commuting from other towns, contributing to a 'trade parade' similar to the Hamptons, adding to the already troubling traffic concerns. Did they also take into account the pedestrian traffic crossing the street? Who will monitor the crossings? Will there be a traffic light installed? .4 !n y y� MY y s the town's infrastructure capable of handling this added traffic? Wh' about fire and medical emergencies? We have a Volunteer fire department : that is already looking for people to join now. Dq II i 5. This will be an exclusive (expensive) compound that will provide shuttle busses to take people to Founders Landing beach which is in the Southold Park District. To paraphrase the Southold Park District webpage: "The Southold Park District is NOT under the jurisdiction of the Town of Southold. Residents of Peconic, parts of the Bay View area and other outside hamlets of the Town of Southold DO NOT pay specific Southold Park District taxes. The use of the grounds is limited to tax paying residents of the Southold Park District only.' It is likely that none of the guests using this hotel will meet this criteria. 5. Is there a shortage of overnight accommodation? Residents who live in Southold have seen their property values rise; and to many, their land is their largest asset. Yet the Town of Southold has restricted residents from renting out their homes for short term rentals. Having stayed in many Airbnb and VRBO homes while traveling, it is often a more desirable and less expensive option. They present the opportunity for visitors to actually be a part of the community. When properly monitored, residents can capitalize on their biggest asset. This hotel will have no such time limit restriction. ' This hotel cannot be, by its very design, part of the community. The project is essentially creating a 'hotel zone'. It is too large, too exclusive and totally out of character for the Southold Hamlet. w = To preserve the historic, small town character of the village; I implore the Zoning Board of Appeals to reject is Special Exception application. RECEIVED _ - [ OCT 2 52021 tOx ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS October 25, 2021 ocT 2 6 2021 Southold Town �°� �` Zoning Board of Appeals c l Southold, NY Ref: Enclaves My name is Jan L Jungblut and I live in the Southold Hamlet. I object to approving the Enclaves special use permit for the following reasons: 1 . There is presently a large number of rooms available for visitors considering the number of local hotels, motels, B&B's and rental homes. So the need for additional accommodations is not mandatory. 2. The design of the proposed hotel and additional buildings do not comply with the historic character of Southold, especially if landscaping is required to hide them from public view. 3. Most use of both the hotel and restaurant would be on weekends, especially during warm weather, which would greatly impact the already crowded Main Road traffic and adjacent roadways. 4. The cost of living and housing is very high in Southold township. Hotel and restaurant workers are generally on the lower scale of wages which would force them to live further west and would further increase daily traffic on the North Fork. 5. Beaches are very crowded during the summer months and often present a logistical problem for the Southold police force. There could conceivably be an additional 100 plus people from the hotel trying to use the crowded Southold town and Southold Park District beaches. This could make Southold taxpayers avoid using their tax supported beaches due to overcrowding. (We also are aware of the litter, unsanitary disposals, parking and other problems at the beaches often caused by non-residents.) lvgb�6 6. We all know that the present labor market, especially for the skills required, are very limited. If the hotel and restaurant cannot keep the necessary staff, it would need to cut back and perhaps close like some other places. This would then leave the property empty and subject to decay and perhaps vandalism. 7. Furthermore granting this special use permit would leave the door open for granting special permits for many other similar or larger projects such as the one being planned by Stacey Soloviev for the Peconic Bay Vineyard. This would have a major impact on the entire town of Southold. Southold of 2025 would not be the Southold of earlier days and even 2015. Main Road would become a Eastern Jericho Turnpike. For these and for the reasons presented by fellow Southold residents strongly recommend that the application for special use exception permit be turned down. Thank you. Sincerely 961"t_��' � Jan L. Jungblut Southold, NY Dear Chairperson Weisman and Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals, OCT 2 6 2021 My name is Stephanie Licciardi. I am a resident of Southold Town. I am 24 years old and have spent the majority of my life living in East Marion. I work in Greenport and=hbe°a'rd&'"I"' understanding and love for the North Fork and the people who live here. �05 - I am writing to oppose the Enclaves request for a Special Exception Permit. We are a town who encourages growth and success for our neighbors, but we do not let this happen without regard for the unique character of this place. In 2020, Southold Town finally passed the Comprehensive Plan. The overarching goals of the comprehensive plan indicate a push for preservation of Southold's rural and historic character, traffic mitigation, decreasing noise pollution, and decreasing light pollution. In what ways does approving the Enclaves request for a Special Exemption Permit promote these ideals? Light pollution, noise pollution, and traffic are all on the rise. As many other locals do, I avoid driving through Southold and Greenport on the weekends because it is dangerous. Anyone could see that this development would make the traffic in an already dangerous area even worse. For this permit to be granted, there are 7 criteria that must be met. To name a few: the development will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties, will be in harmony with the community, will be compatible with its surroundings in scale, and that the safety,the health, the welfare, the comfort, the convenience, or the order of the Town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location. In what ways does this project meet the standards of the Special Exemptions permit? I do not believe it meets these criteria in any way. I am confident in this Zoning Board of Appeals. You work hard to ensure the character of the Southold Town. I believe that allowing this permit to go through will be a huge mistake. You are working in the government to listen to and protect the concerns of the people who live here. You are in this amazing position that allows you to stick up for local residents in cases where developers want to take away what makes this place so special. I know you love Southold Town as much as I do. The rapid changes and influx of development is staggering and terrifying. What will be left of Southold Town if we let developers call the shots? I don't think it is someplace I would want to call home. Please listen to those who live and work in Southold Town by denying the Enclave's request for a Special Exemption Permit. Thank you for your consideration of my comments. All my best, Stephanie Licciardi 50 Cleaves Point Rd East Marion,NY 11939 Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Annex Building OCT 7 202' 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 7)J"fiNG;IOA G04-'0PEAH 10s� October 26, 2021 Request for Special Exception Use Permit for Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant I To the ZBA: I live in the Founders Landing neighborhood, the area that would be the most effected if the proposed resort is built. There are approximately 200 homes on this peninsula, with the three streets that directly face the Enclaves our only egress. As you have heard many times, turning onto Main Road from Town Harbor Lane, Locust Lane or Cottage Place is already challenging during the summer season. If built, the safety of my neighbors would be seriously compromised, including the ability of first responders to quickly access any emergency. The town must not choose unchecked growth over safety. Protecting its citizens is the first responsibility of government. Having attended the October 14 ZBA meeting, I found the closing remarks of Attorney Altman to be offensive and demeaning. The idea that our community is not dealing with facts is a gross misrepresentation of our engagement. We have read the FEIS and believe that their assessments of traffic to be inaccurate. The civic participation of our community cannot be so easily dismissed —over 500 people have signed our petition to halt this project before irreparable damage is done: https://www.gopetition.com/petitions/opposition-to-the-enclaves- hotel-in-Southold-ny.html On another note, Town Attorney Bill Duffy' s statement that "this is not a popularity contest" seemed designed to cast aspersions on our efforts to protect the community, as if our arguments were superficial and not sound and justified. He then emphasized only the four criteria for the permit that spoke IN FAVOR of the project, concerning lot size and public water. It was only later in the meeting when Sally Kahn, on Zoom, pointed out the other criteria for granting the permit that Mr. Duffy' s remarks appeared inadequate and misleading. On page 2 of the application for special exception, items A,B,C,D, and E all speak to the health, safety, welfare, compatibility and character of the community. Mr. Duffy' s comments seemed inexplicably prejudicial and demoralizing for those of us who pay his salary. I ask you to vote no on the permit. Sincerely, 3 i Nancy Butkus 655 Town Harbor Lane Southold, NY 11971 Fuentes, Kim �. From: Dan Sullivan <dan.su1livan283@gmail.com> pP��y� Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 2:24 PM To: Fuentes, Kim Ott 2 Subject: [SPAM] -The Enclaves, Special Exception Permit 1, Dear Chairperson Weisman and Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals, My name is Dan Sullivan, and I am a twenty-four-year-old resident of Southold Town. I grew up sailing and later teaching for 7 years at the Southold Yacht Club and have lived here since my college graduation in 2019. My mom works at a local small business in town. My family and I are active in the community, love and deeply care about Southold, and want the best for local residents and business alike. While I make a habit to vote in every local election, I rarely engage in local advocacy and instead entrust town officials to make decisions that benefit the community. In this instance,though, I write to strongly oppose the Special Exception Permit for the Enclaves Project under consideration by the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA). At the hearing on October 14, Town Attorney Bill Duffy "emphasized...that the ZBA is bound by town code" when considering the permit. §280-142: General Standards of Article XXV of Southold Town Code ("Special Exception Uses") states: "No special exception approval shall be granted unless the [ZBA] specifically finds and determines" certain stipulations regarding a Special Exception Permit application. I would like to offer my opinion on how the proposed Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant directly contradict some of these stipulations. • A. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or properties in adjacent use districts/ C. That the safety, the health, the welfare, the comfort, the convenience or the order of the Town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location.Nearly every morning, I drive to North Fork Roasting Company on the corner of Boisseau Avenue and Main Road/Rt-25. Even in the supposed"off-season,"turning out of that parking lot onto the Main Road is difficult—in the peak months, it's a death wish. The 7-11 parking lot across from the proposed lot is unfortunately not much better. I cannot imagine what the effect of a 40-room hotel, 74- seat restaurant, and 250-person event hall presumably near capacity in the already-mobbed summer months—would have on traffic in that part of Southold. Simply put, the infrastructure of the town is not meant to safely support higher capacity than it currently sees (and common-sense alone casts doubt on the conclusion of the environmental review of no traffic impact). • D. That the use will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes and intent of this chapter. §280-139 ("Purpose") states that Special Exception Permits are designed to "assure compatibility [of projects] with existing land use patterns, community character, and the natural environment." I cannot think of anything more contradictory to the "community character" of Southold hamlet than a large hotel in the town designed exclusively for non-residents. The Enclaves Proiect will alter the feel of the hamlet from a sleepy village town to bustling center for out-of-town visitors at the expense of locals, increase traffic to an intolerable point for residents who live and work in Southold like my family and I, and establish a slippery slope for Special Exception Permits for other large hotel projects (is one hotel okay, but not two? Three?The approval of one makes difficult the rejection of others.) The Town instituted restrictions on rental properties less than two weeks because they did not want create a just another Hamptons in our backyard—people with no connection to the community trashing the town at the expense of those who love here. The Enclaves permit should be rejected on similar grounds. • E. That the use will be compatible with its surroundings and with the character of the neighborhood and of the community in general, particularly with regard to visibility, scale, and 1 0 ft overall appearance. A 6.75-acre property with a 40-room hotel, 4 additional guest cottages, a 74-seat restaurant, a 250-person event hall, rooftop lounge,pool, spa, and 122 parking spaces is strongly misaligned with the "visibility, scale, and overall appearance...of the character of the neighborhood." I urge the ZBA to reject the Enclaves' request for a Special Exception Permit on its many shortcomings, including those stated above. Thank you for consideration of my comments. Best, Dan Sullivan Southold,NY 2 r RECEIVED October 24, 2021 -i o06 � OCT 2 8 2021 Dear ZBA Members, ZNING BOARD OF APPEALS lt I feel the need to send my comments in to you regarding the Enclaves project after reading the article in the recent Suffolk Times. I was unable to attend the meeting. In particular, some of the comments made by business owners. The North Fork Table Restaurant and Einstein Square are both assets . However, they are existing sites that needed to be re worked and restored. The key word here is existing. They have not affected the village and it's residents in negative, quality of life ways, because they were already here! Most of the Enclave project is new build. If these Local business owners see the need for a hotel I can understand that. What I don't understand is thinking that a 44 room hotel with a pool and spa and event space for 250 people is what our village and Southold town needs. There are places already existing in the town of Southold for events. There are also existing places that offer spa services in Southold town. These are established local small businesses, run by owners who work hard to offer these services. That stretch of the main street in Southold also has established businesses and residences. How unfair to them. On my street we are living through construction of a gas station only a few feet away from a residential section of Youngs Avenue. Believe me it is not pleasant,is affecting our quality of Life and will continue to do so. The Town Board has not addressed any upgrades in infrastructure as these projects wind their way through planning and zoning boards. Just because the property is zoned for something does not make it a good fit. This project, if it's approved at this size will affect many residents especially those living to the south of the main street, as well as those Living near this project on the north side. The Menhaden in Greenport is a good example of the right way to do things. It fits seamlessly into Greenport village, you really have to look carefully to see it's a hotel. The residents living near and in Southold village were here first. They should be listened to, their voices should count the most-. They know what it's Like to get around my their village. Sincerely, Cheryle Amara, resident of Southold fOAN LOVE PO BOX 998 L I ) SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 To Whom It May Concern: OCT 2 c) 2021 � I am writing in regards to a plan that the town officials are contemplating about a hotel on Main Street. With all do respect, I can't help but wonder why our community has not been considered in this decision since we far outnumber the town officials choosing such a project that will affect all of our lives who live here. You must already know why we,AND YOU, live in the Town of Southold. Surely you are aware It's the only GEM left to live in on the East End. It is a beautiful,tranquil, historic, New England like Setting that is a GIFT to us all. We live here because of the calming effect, a step back in time to be Embraced with many homes dating back to the 1800,s and 1900,s. We don't want to live like the life Up-Island. Whatever happened to only allowing B& B's in order to keep the character Southold Town? Whatever happened to "SAVE WHAT'S LEFT"? Rumor has it that the Developer and Lawyers are encouraging the town. How shameful it would be that someone could be so influenced at the expense of their neighbors. Somehow Burt's seems very encouraged! I hope that isn't true. Why are the officials thinking of changing something that doesn't need to be changed. This town has a calming effect.We like it the way it is. Do we need a shuttle bus invading a quiet neighborhood going to the smallest beach on the North Fork which is already overcrowded? The traffic study must be from 20 years ago. It has grown disturbingly in the last 4 years since we have been discovered AGAIN! On any given weekday,there is now heavy traffic in both directions. It can now take up to 45—50 minutes to Riverhead! What about the Environmental Impact to this small town? Light pollution from all the exterior lighting. AND recently we got flyers stating we should turn off outside lights early because it causes confusion to the birds, butterflies,etc. Noise pollution from activity, pool, parties etc. X�t 4 5, 6 Soil and Water pollution from the landscapers applying chemicals onto the grounds of the property. AND cleaning detergents used by the cleaning staff. Air quality would be compromised from up to the 88 cars that would be in the parking lot when booked to capacity. 50 plus toilets, how disgusting! In addition,the heavy impact of non recylcled trash going to the dump! Maybe a 10 room B& B proposal from a developer who showed respect for this historic town and residents would not have been met with such opposition and negativity. Honestly, if we wanted to live with a huge HOTEL,we would move to Riverhead, Nassau or any other over developed area. We've seen enough changes. Shame on the wealthy Developers that may be permitted to steal our life style. Totally Distraught and Disturbed over my beautiful Town's invasion. Joan Love cz /-v AK 44 � %n V l . &'`' z,&,,zW 4 Q ,Z.v a,0-7Z � � o ��- Ivan Kaplan 725 Hobart Road Southold NY 11971 November 1, 2021 400 X Re: Enclaves Project Dear Members of the Zoning Board, e �� As a homeowner and taxpayer of Southold I am extremely concerned and disappointed in the most recent events related to the proposed Enclaves project and the overall current flurry of land acquisitions and properties in Southold. I attended the most recent October 141hmeeting of the Zoning Board and was dismayed at the overall "fait accompli" attitude of the Board. You have the ability to STOP this project and not allow any concessions or variances. To hear our Town lawyer talk about how"this is not a popularity contest" was frankly insulting. When did Southold go up for sale? When did the Town and Zoning Board stop listening to the public? Especially the residents of Founders Landing who actually live here-and will have to deal with the endless traffic, hotel guests at our local beach, added noise and light pollution. It seems like there are other factors at work here and I question why this Board is continuing on a path that is so opposed by the local residents. I've read and the seen the articles in the-paper and know that scores of residents that are against this project. It is no surprise that no one on the Zoning Board actually lives in Founders Landing, if you did you wouldn't be for this project. My wife's family has owned property in the Founders Landing area for more than 80 years. This is not the place for a 44-room hotel. The reality that this specific piece of property was zoned for a hotel based on the original owner's need to rent out a room in the 1930s to make money to feed her family and that it has now somehow morphed into a 44- room Hotel is unbelievable. Not only that, but a 75-person restaurant, a potential 250-person event space, rooftop bar, pool, associated parking and a green space suitable,by their own admission at the meeting, "for fundraisers" etc. is totally absurd. The traffic, loud music and noise coming off the Main Road from the surrounding businesses is already unbearable at our home on Korn and Hobart.Why does the Town need to add to this? Traffic this past weekend, in October, was terrible and it's not high season yet you tell us that by adding this Hotel and support spaces it will have little or no affect on us. It is just insulting. Is Southold town in such need for tax revenues that everything is up for sale including our quality of life? Why should we as tax payers and homeowners believe these developers at all?What is the recourse when they say they will provide traffic control, keep the noise down and have no plans for our beach?Are our Police and other public service departments equipped to handle the complaints? This project started with 22-rooms and now it's at 44. When and why would they stop until they buy up additional properties and add on or decide they can't make it with 10 events a year and decide to do additional events or parties for 100 people or more every day. We as a community don't want this. Stop it now. Don't grant any variances. Make them revert to the original plan of 22-rooms or better yet withdraw their plans altogether. Either way, insist that the entrance be moved from the Main Road. Make them build a new entrance and exit from another location if this must move forward. Why add more traffic to our overburdened road. I think the overall question is WHY. Why does the Zoning Board and the Town need this so badly when its citizens don't. Just Say No. Respectfully, bl Cia'L /1 Ivan Kaplan Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 October 28 2021 RE: Request for Special Exception Use Permit for Enclaves Hotel&Restaurant r To the ZBA, My husband and I attended the October 14 ZBA meeting at Town Hall re the construction of the proposed hotel, "The Enclaves". We realize that hotels are needed in the area but the size(44 rooms plus) and the particular location will have a negative impact on this quiet town.The traffic on Rt 25 —alreddy congested in the summer will only magnify. Apart from the increased traffic the following proposals will make living very unpleasant for local residents: *A shuttle bus for guests to the 2 quite small local beaches *The strain on local emergency services,fire,police, ambulance and garbage pickup. *Noisy late weddings or events will disturb the area.The developer quoted"10 large events per year" but what about other events at ..'North Fork Table&Inn(next door), • The Southold Venue, • and two (as yet unnamed commercially zoned properties) • The Shoals All owned and managed by the same company. Southold is a small quiet town with charming small shops and gentle foot traffic.The concept of huge buildings, bringing in a constant flow of tourists right in the middle of it will be disastrous. This project will be very detrimental to the town and its residents. We are very distressed at the sound of this hotel and event center,and the likely prospect of several others along- side it. Please vote no to this Special Exception Permit! Sincerely, rd�VJ rCl Caroline Bowyer and Murrareenfield 2615 Bay Avenue, - Mattituck NY 11952 Westermann, Donna From: Fuentes, Kim Sent: Monday, November 01, 2021 8:55 AM To: Westermann, Donna Subject: FW:The Enclave NOV 0 � X021 From: Connie Monteforte [connie.monteforte@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, October 30, 20211:54 PM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject:The Enclave I am writing to protest this project. If any of this proposal is approved, it would definitely set a precedent for any future projects in our lovely town. I live in Cutchogue and there is another proposed hotel and spa in our little town. You must dig your heels in and put a stop to this.The people proposing these projects don't even live here and the majority of people do not want a Disneyland atmosphere for adults. People fall in love with the Northfork because of its low key country atmosphere. Please do not approve! Connie Monteforte Sent from my Wad ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 1 4 Westermann, Donna From: Fuentes, Kim Sent: Monday, November 01, 2021 8:55 AM To: Westermann, Donna Subject: FW:The Proposed Enclaves �� � From: Emily Geiger [emmsesq@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, October 30, 20212:11 PM t To: Fuentes, Kim Subject:The Proposed Enclaves I am sending this email to the members of the Zoning Board of Appeals. I was present at Town Hall on October 14 for the first hour of the presentation to the Board by the applicants representing The Enclaves.As you know the room was entirely filled and many were standing out in the hallway. It really was a movie scene of the villagers come to town waving pitchforks and torches. I encountered no one in favor of this overblown project. I knew both Al and Rita who lived in the house and had a small b and b,The Hedges. One of the applicant speakers insisted that Rita was"just delighted"that her house would remain.Well hardly. The "renovated" house/restaurant is completely unrecognizable as The Hedges. Aside from the nightmarish traffic,the expensive restaurant ala The North Fork Table,the rooftop lounge/bar, the lavish cottages behind the hotel,the entertainment venue-really what is proposed is a Sandals Resort. Add a putting green and a tennis court and The Enclaves is a resort. Minimizing it's impact by calling it a hotel is plainly silly and dishonest The whole thing is shockingly out of character for Southold Town. And while it may very well have met every condition needed for a variance approval it certainly does not have a quality of life stamp of approval from the majority of the community. Sincerely, Emily Geiger PO Box S02 Southold Sent from my iPhone ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. Nov 2921 October 30, 2021i,i �j�a� ;�� To the members of the Southold Town ZBA, After growing up in Orient, and my husband growing up in Southold, we knew we wanted to eventually buy a home somewhere on the North Fork. In 2016 that dream became a reality and we purchased our home just east of the proposed Enclaves location. As I read through the plan for "Then Enclaves" and scrolled through the images of what is being proposed I thought to myself "there is no way the town will approve this." This project would completely change the nature of our little North Fork town and cause numerous issues for the residence who call Southold "home" year round. After reading through the Final Environmental Impact Statement it seemed that some things are not being considered completely or to the extent they should be. * Increased traffic - it is already dangerous to make a left hand turn out of our driveway to head west. The FEIS only states that "no significant adverse traffic impacts on or off-site will occur". I am unsure of the "study" performed however a busy weekend evening of cars coming from Greenport and North Fork Table already cause traffic situations. Additionally the intersection of the Main Road and Boisseau Ave is already dangerous, I cannot imagine what a weekend event would do to that intersection. *.The FEIS also states that the summer traffic count was done in July 2018. Now, three years, and a pandemic, later the number of people on and visiting the North Fork has grown exponentially. Those 2018 counts should hardly hold any weight. * Finding staff for this project will be a huge hurdle. The hotel, restaurant, and events would all require part and full time employees however where will those employees live? There is already a lack of affordable housing on the North Fork and a project of this scope will draw in employees from out of town directly adding to the traffic issue. Have you driven to Southampton between May and September? Do we really want that line of traffic through the town of Southold? * The plans mention offering a shuttle service to allow hotel guests to visit our beaches. Our beaches are already maxed out, not enough staff to man the life guard stations, and the trash that piles up is horrendous. The project and shuttle service would push local families away from out beaches and possibly off of the North Fork all together. * A hotel of this size with a restaurant that seats 70+ people seems very similar to the Shoals just a mile or so east of this proposed project. Does Southold need another hotel/venue in such proximity? * The Shoals, North Fork Table & Inn, 57125 Main Road, 56695 Main Road, The NOV 0 1 proposed Enclave location, and the Southold Venue (formerly Caci) are all now owned, by Jonathan Tibbett &friends. In addition to Southold General, thean � former Rothman's. Each of these are commercial properties, and that stretch of the Main Road in Southold are almost a continuous stretch of land owned by the same person/group. Is there anything in Southold town code that prevents each of these locations from having one event per week? In other words, a wedding at the proposed Enclaves Thursday, a wedding at the Shoals Friday, a wedding at the Southold Venue Saturday, and another wedding at the North Fork Table Sunday? Each individual business would be holding to this "one event per week" but the community would be setup for disaster. It makes sense for these investors to maximize the return on their investment with all of these properties, however it will be at the expense of the people who call this area home. Ultimately the request for this special exemption goes against everything Southold Town recently adopted and put forward in it's "Comprehensive Plan" that came out in early 2020. Protecting our "small town quality of life" is mentioned several times in the Comprehensive Plan, now is the time for the ZBA to do just that. Please protect our small town, people want to come here because of how it is now. If the Enclaves is approved as is it will not just open the door to hotels all over the North Fork, it will blow the door right off the hinges. Sincerely, Katie Peters Westermann, Donna From: Fuentes, Kim Sent: Monday, November 01, 2021 8:56 AM To: Westermann, Donna Subject: FW: Enclaves Hotel and Spa From: Noah Doyle [noah.doyle@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, October 30, 20219:22 AM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: Enclaves Hotel and Spa October 30, 2021 Town of Southold Chairperson Weisman and the Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Application for a Special Exception Use Permit(the "Application")to the Town of Southold (the "Town")Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA") by 56655 Main Road LLC ("Applicant") in connection with the proposed development of the Enclaves Hotel and Spa ("Project") at the property located at 56655 Main Road,Southold, New York 11971 a/k/a S.C.Tax Map Identification No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the "Property"). Dear Chairperson Weisman: I own a property located at 7 Stirling Cove, Greenport, NY 11944. 1 understand that the Applicant will be presenting the Application before the ZBA, requesting a Special Exception Use Permit to develop the Project and I support the Project and ask that it be granted. The Project is a carefully considered, responsible development that is needed in the Town's business district. I have reviewed (i)the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS"), prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. ("PW"), dated April 2019, and last revised October 2019, (ii)the Final Environmental Impact Statement, prepared by PW, dated April 2020, and last revised July 2021 ("FEIS"), including the Special Exception Use Permit Analysis in Appendix 1 (iii)the relevant parts of Southold's Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), adopted in November 2020 and (iv)the August 19, 2021 ZBA Resolution accepting the FEIS. I concur with the ZBA's adoption of the FEIS and believe that the Project is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Further, the FEIS analyzed, in great detail, how the Project meets the criteria for the issuance of a Special Exception Use Permit pursuant to the Town of Southold Code. Therefore, as the Application before the ZBA is for a Special Exception Use Permit and this analysis has already been reviewed and adopted by the ZBA as part of the FEIS, I support the issuance of the Special Exception Use Permit for the Project. As Founder of the North Fork TV Festival, our team recently held a meeting to discuss the future direction of the TV Festival. The top issue that concerns the stakeholders of the TV Festival is the short supply of hotel rooms on the North Fork. If our community wants to be a community that can host events that support the Arts, our community needs more hotel rooms. Secondly, there is a difference in projects that are building massive Hilton, Marriott, or other chain hotels, versus the charming and elegant plans thatI ave seen from the Enclaves Hotel and Sp I/respectfully request that this Letter of Support be included in the Town's file for this matter. I believe the majority of our community, support this type of thoughtful development. Thank you for your attention in this regard. NOV Very truly yours, Noah Doyle Greenport, NY ATTENTION:This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. z t ' r t Westermann, Donna From: Fuentes, Kim S� Sent: Monday, November 01, 2021 8:58 AM V To: Westermann, Donna Subject: FW: [SPAM] - Enclaves Project NOV 01 From: c spornberger [cspornberger@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, October 29, 20215:13 PM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: [SPAM] - Enclaves Project Hi Ms. Fuentes, I would like to have the letter (below) read and considered by all the ZBA members. Yours was the only email listed on the website, so I am sending this to you. As such, please forward it on to all of the other ZBA members on my behalf. Please copy me on the email distribution to those other members. Thank you in advance for all your help. Dear Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals: I am deeply disturbed by the Enclaves situation on many levels. The additional traffic issues, the Hamptons style change, staffing issues, noise, disturbances to neighborhoods...just to name a few. These are all very valid points and concerns that those in the community who are against this project have raised, and I wholeheartedly support and echo my neighbors in their concerns on each of those issues against the Enclaves project. Those points have all been brought to your attention, and I hope you consider them all. But I would also like to bring a few other issues to your attention that I hope you will also consider when making your decision. ' I grew up in the Founders Landing area, graduated from Southold High School. I moved away for a short time, went to college, married, and started a family. At the first chance we could afford, my husband and I bought a second home out here to allow our children to have roots in this area. We respectfully and lovingly summered and spent every holiday and available weekend throughout the rest of each year out here for 20 years to enable our children to live a simpler life that focused on what is important in the world. Every one of those 20 years, as our family enjoyed Founders Landing beach, my husband and I would dream of the day we could be out here full time. When our youngest graduated high school, we did just that. We moved out here full time. Our dream came true. I am not averse to progress. I am also not averse to people coming here to enjoy the same experience that I wanted and have for my own family. What I am averse to is the blatant disregard for the community and the individual neighborhoods that many bring. That is and will always be my biggest concern. And that is what I feel is happening with those representing the Enclaves project. The fact that Mr. Giambertone, a representative for the Enclave project, said in the October 21, 2021 article in the Suffolk Times, "We have not given serious consideration to how Founders Landing may or may not fit into the business" but then stated conversely and contradictorily, "We were under the impression that as taxpayers in the community, the people who came to the hotel had the right to use it..." should speak volumes to you as to their intent for the community, the individual neighborhoods and neighbors, the local beaches, and the local resources. This doublespeak and blatant disregard i ' -1 concern me and, quite frankly, should concern each of you. And this is most- likely NOT the only thing they are doublespeaking or being deceptive about. (For another example, Mr. Giambertone's further comment in the article, "We've developed an extensive outdoor entertainment area..." Which;,,§ doublespeak for the parties will be loud and endless, disruptive to anything and anyone in the area.) So please consider that what they say and what they mean are two very differlgvt�tbinl 255 hen you are contemplating the decision requested before you. � My concern is also for both Founders Landing and the beach access at the end-of Town Harbor Lane (maybe more so, Town Harbor, because access is not adequately monitored). These are both already very crowded in the summertime. Now add in the patrons of a 44-room hotel with conservatively an average of at least 2 people per room, and you could conceivably have 88 more (plus) people with now a "right" to those beaches and waters on any given day. You are talking a "Jones Beach" type crowding as the beach square footage is limited already. Additionally, more lifeguards would need to be employed in that scenario. Parking is already limited and overflowing into the neighborhood streets. That many more people will add that much more of a problem for parking. And that is also 88 more people per day who will put pressure on the bathroom facilities at Founders Landing Park (just to name one other thing of many being pushed to the limit) ...or if at the beach at the end of Town Harbor Lane, potentially relieve themselves in the water due to the lack of facilities down there. Not right, but it does happen. And will it happen more often if there are more people who are given access who don't have any concern for the community, the neighborhoods, the natural resources in the area, etc? It must be considered as a possibility/probability. What effect does this all have on the environment? Another thought from my statement above, what is the proposed occupant level per room at the Enclave? Because this will further significantly and adversely impact all the aforementioned issues as well as many others! The public has a right to know the answer to that as well. Also, when Mr. Giambertone speaks of"guests right" to use the surrounding beaches does that also extend to guests of their 250-person event space, not just guests of the hotel accommodation? Where people attending the "event/parties" can first spend the day down at Founders Landing or the Town Harbor Lane beach access? Or continue their party at the beach after their party/event is over? Consider the controversial Vineyard 48 and all the issues that venue had in the neighborhood they were in. All these and similar should be considered by the ZBA for the Enclave property, hotel, outdoor space, and event space. And the people of this community have a right to have answers to these and similar questions. The town has spoken very loudly this past summer, taking many great steps to protect and preserve our local beaches by limiting town stickers for access. The town, and all its boards, need to be united and consistent in this approach when regarding access at our local beaches. Similarly, the town, and all its boards, also need to be united and consistent in how it treats individuals and businesses. Just as the town held the people with individual rental properties to a two- week minimum rental restriction to ensure that neighborhoods were not overcome with horrible living conditions and disturbances, you need to make sure businesses are not causing problems in the neighborhoods they seek to come into. And if you sense that they will cause these kinds of problems and/or they employ doublespeak, as has been brought to your attention in the comments by Mr. Giambertone referenced above, you must reject that project based on the harm it would do to the community and the neighborhoods. There are many beautiful resources out here that don't exist in many other places. The farmland, the beaches, the waters, the wildlife, the natural ecosystem —these all need to be preserved. And in making these decisions for a project like the Enclaves, and any other in the future, you are tasked 2 with the awesome duty of preserving all of that. I ask each of you to think\ long and hard on this, because the wrong decision will change the fabric of what makes this area so great. Thank you in advance. I truly appreciate your time, consideration, and service. Kind regards, l Christina Spornberger 3895 Wells Ave Southold, New York 11971 631-876-5559 � C 3 I 1 � _s -rawMi i I � �L�, �� • .til �►+L_,IJ�/ � F41 Em I ZEN SEA FPO, Elm,W-exy-1 I �_ _'iial. � � � :� ir1_�.L �� •' 4 i l.., �. IN I Oil;llll 1� I l IWIN , FEW I i r � t+ October 26, 2021 Millicent Persson 2675 Main Bayview Road NOV 01 2021 Southold,NY 11971 Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 119.71 Dear Leslie Weisman, Zoning Chairperson: The proposed Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant with a 74 Seat Restaurant and 44 room hotel, as well as pools, spa, out door event area in addition to parking for guest and employees on 6.75 acres sounds totally unrealistic. It would cause extensive traffic on this very very narrow main road in Southold. It could cause bikers,joggers and seniors walking in this area to be in danger. Parking on Route 25 would diminish visibility to drivers going east and west. Parking on side roads in the area would reduce the towns well being. Allowing 250 people to this space as well as staff would certainly increase noise. Since this project is variance-free and a special use permit is all but approved, why the charade of a meeting. If this project was for half of the size of the restaurant and number of rooms on this 6.75 acres it would be more in line with the cozy North Fork community of Southold and not a box style Hampton wanna be! Thank you for your tim Millicent Persson t ' Westermann, Donna From: Diane Niebling <dniebling@ymail.com> NOV Sent: Monday, November 01, 2021 11:32 AM To: Westermann, Donna Subject: [SPAM] - Fwd: Sincere request to the Zoning Board re: building of proposed large hotels Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Diane Niebling <dniebling(cr�ymail.com> Date: October 31, 2021 at 3:53:24 PM To Whom it May Concern. My husband & I, as homeowners in Cutchogue, as well as many of our neighbors &friends, are deeply disturbed to hear that 2 large hotels are being proposed to be built in Cutchogue & Southold. We purchased our home on the North Fork in 1989 for the small town values and it's similarity to New England, atmosphere &the type of community we wished to live in. We did not want the commercialization or glitz of the South Fork. The quality of our quaint, quiet towns will disappear if these larger hotels with their large capacity ball rooms & large parking lots are built. The traffic will increase exponentially on an already choked road system. Making a left out of King Kullen already means taking your life in your hands. With a hotel across the street it would be impossible to get in or out& sure many accidents would ensue. It could take hours longer to go anywhere. These hotels would change the very nature of why we wanted to live in an idyllic place in the historic town of Southold. The tranquility, the beauty &the wonderful town main streets we know& love. If we didn't, we would have gone someplace else. Every time I ride from Cutchogue to Greenport, I admire the beautiful historic homes, churches & tasteful &beautiful buildings. I appreciate all the beauty of this lovely area. I love the values they represent & for us, that is the American Dream of living in a small, quiet community. It will be disturbing and change the nature of our beautiful towns forever in a way that will be so detrimental to the North Fork's identity. We love all the vineyards & farm stands. I'm sure I'm not alone in voicing these concerns and thank you for giving us the opportunity to beseech the Zoning Board to reconsider this building project to save the things we love &value most about North Fork life. Respectfully, Diane & Laurence Niebling Sent from my iPhone i 0 20Z o -Fc&h4L Igo U Z_0e -�o �c , Coo h -i ht _12JA d in 4 aean-9 K, -i ucw t�q o--I- hAQ7A'C,'4 WY) Lw ( V)" A�g • " L vlkio — cis— �Ql+e_i'�� NF A'V 1 d UY , S mod\4 P� w aq a:1 :W".. A uo_�A 4gn5�,e_ L,!*,!n olf- c iv-cam Gz� ior )s -�o �wy', -V)%e ir nO cw g) Rco'Le- �a 1A)CIS 4m+eci +ho+ -a--+r- cr ed- c vn o c.,)y- -f-r a-C, /CL"Cl 'laa c r.A- u d � �ri t r-L cLkk Vu ct L cS c Lp r Cwt. -netr 9 �.J I O A �p-cl co- Wou IC4, ()L+,-ed 4n cL)v- n - z 1® AtGo w—Ka �o01d � --_------.-------------- i r �Ao�-a //y/'� ! 0 L2 e d vv Ste.(X �, clty c.- rid (A-) cl4+16 p OU, Jpjj o ug V `p'M1a",P' > 1 xY i Y -+ , p <{T T'�T ''�+e£ F l �'✓,� 1 F. i^'J+e>p V �-Yvn ... _-•w��fvsxnq��q��yy..-'-meq_` •�Y � -.. T,.v r• _V- .p\��__. - p9 -__ - • 3 _. - __. �y�+�-�{AJ j.�ry 9� ..D.f_«���¢�-'_•' ��. E`M Idd1�t�joU, ,8^°1'�, y 1���.,,,r�..,,.;4a�'1 K �• 4�{ �<'•� Ah t.g.+`"'�„_. ,€t`'`> •$ $ i `^�.JL.j u+ ! 3° - _'`" #s 'i a - 3`spt ••�,5 ° � v v � L �'s 1l'�-.�3 °rte �-«A � �.® i,� ` `a 9 i3 _.� .s `�� r• �z.,».,� �L � ,� y.. � f rE. a Ralf IF Ra,v w- -u rj{ i - i rte.• _ . _-1 - _ •_ - - - - of y - — 'Y F` .4� J'- ii d 1 •��`p _; lDt o Jf'' _ �: 'i S _ fo o )aw NY i FOR THE EAST END _ - , e<;3 j ^ n NOV 03ti, '. ^_ a November 1, 2021 .. ��` Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 44 Southold Town P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant Application for Special Exception Permit(56655 Main Road Southold, NY) Dear Chairperson Weisman, } • ' � ' On behalf of Group for the East End, please consider the following comments pertaining to The Enclaves Hotel and Restaurant request for a Special Exception WWAMMU � Permit. Group for the East End provided comments on the Draft Environmental Impact M d, mv Statement (December 9, 2019) and at the Zoning Board of Appeals hearing (October A 14, 2021). Our comments at this writing are specific to the subject applications non- " conformance with the Southold Town Comprehensive Plan and its inability to meet the standards and guidelines provided in Southold Town Code Section 280-142 &143, Special Exception Uses. General Statement In Opposition: r � �X � Group for the East End unequivocally opposes the subject application's request for a Special Exception Permit and implores the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals to reject the request. The Town of Southold and countless community members exerted ' enormous time, effort and funds to create a clear vision and planning strategy for Southold's future when it adopted the Southold Town Comprehensive Plan last year. p p � Y Through and through, the Comprehensive Plan defines the towns planning goals and objectives as aimed at preserving the town's historic community character and small- „ � town appeal. In fact, the plans Vision Statement exemplifies this strong sentiment as follows: .Our citizens cherish Southold's small-town quality of life and wish to preserve what we currently value while planning for a productive and viable future"(Chapter 1 - Vision Statement). Because of its scale and overall macinitude, the sub ect application is in obvious and direct conflict with the Comprehensive Plan's vision and established goals and, ,,.;; �,,,_1,,;,r-�„•,q$ r, objectives, and begs the question, why have a plan, if it's not going to bd;'adhered,to?�' Given the subject proposals conflict with the duly-adopted goals and�objectivess'of;the_ Comprehensive Plan which specifically speak to community character- small=scale p, °r appeal, the necessity of traffic calming measures, and preservationuality',,of-life,, the subject application cannot meet the Town Code Section 280=1.42-4143,'4hich..` were designed to ensure that like the Comprehensive Plan that,ne-W develo rnenf',,`p proposals are compatible and in harmony with the surrounding area.�r'q_:� �°.� pF""A! Protecting the natUre of theplace yon l- ', k Comprehensive Plan Excerpts In Conflict With Proposed Application: a , R Unfortunately, the Final Environmental Impact Statement concluded that due to the application's purported conformance with the economic goals of the Comprehensive Plan, the project ultimately conforms to the Plan in general. However, this is far from accurate. Numerous sections of the Comprehensive Plan were left out of the analysis and critical in helping the Zoning Board of Appeals understand whether or not the subject application can conform to the Special Exception Permit standards provided in Town Code. Please see below for excerpts that deserve considerable review. Chapter 3:Land Use and Zoning. Goals/Issue for Southold Hamlet(page49) Maintain and enhance our community's "sense of place"and our residential, rural, and historic character by encouraging mixed, small-scale, commercial and residential � development in our hamlet center,maintaining the viability of our Main Street as a ; ,X , business district for local entrepreneurs; (page 49) The Comprehensive Plan also includes the following, under Southold hamlet: 3sry A I Provide incentives for new businesses that favor adaptive reuse over new construction. This is discussed in more detail in Chapter 5 "Community Character."(page 49) eft �4 C I Improve traffic congestion and safety and pedestrian safety. Details from the Hamlet Stakeholders'recommendations are included in Chapter 4, "Transportation & Infrastructure."(page 49). � r Chapter 4: Transportation &Infrastructure ` Figure 4.7 Crash Locations and High Crash Intersections in Town of Southold(page 123). This figure lists the intersection of Boisseau Avenue and Route 25 - "High Crash rte , Location." This intersection is less than a quarter of a mile from the subject site. Goal 1: Reduce Traffic Congestion During Peak Tourist Season (page 126 Objective 1.1 Investigate ways to improve traffic circulation. (page 127) ` C Investigate traffic generation from special events and festivals. The Town � 9 g p fl" �c •� �° needs more data to better understand the impacts of special events and festivals, particularly how small events affect traffic congestion when,they occur simultaneously and even more so when they coincide with-larger,,;events.,, q N'.j� ` Goal 2:Reduce Future Traffic Congestion Due to Development(page,128)-�'\\,,,,"" 77 . Objective 2.2 Require multimodal traffic and transportation studies`of'laege,� " developments. By requiring applicants to conduct multimodal transp'ortatio,`n"studies'�for large commercial developments, the Town can leverage the reit PT traffic-calming, pedestrian safety, sidewalks, access management, and-tradltional-traffic improvements from the applicants. Rl , wt Protectinge nature of the place you `T'I pye x 4 staff �` Chapter 5: Community Character Goal 3 -Preserve Quality of Life in Residential Neighborhoods (page 154) Objective 3.3 Reduce Impacts from noise and light pollution. Identify incompatible ' actions and uses located within or near residential neighborhoods. Evaluate the effectiveness and enforcement of the relevant Town Code sections, including but not ° limited to lighting, noise, and special events, to control the impacts from those actions and uses (page 154). Special Exception Permit Standards In Conflict with Proposed Application: It must be clearly understood that a Special Exception Permit application as defined by the Town Code, shall be rejected if the subject application cannot conform to the . + provisions of the Zoning Code, and zoning codes must be consistent with a k{ Y community's Comprehensive Plan. The town's present planning goals must be recognized by all land-use boards in their decision-making. It is now the duly adopted policy of Southold Town to render land-use decisions that foster the protection of the town's historic, low intensity and rural community character. Given this, it is impossible to rationally argue that the proposed action could ever be p , ` r considered compliant with the numerous considerations that must be met to achieve the criteria for a Special Exception permit. At minimum, the subject application cannot meet the following guidelines and standards. 280-142 A. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts. Given the already heavy traffic volume in the immediate vicinity of the proposed action, � and the applicant's own admission that the project's operation will result in service level declines and require private traffic control to accommodate the increased traffic x w a N associated with events, the proposal by definition will clearly result in the imposition of additional traffic burdens and impositions on the reasonable use of adjacent properties. 280-142 B. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the district wherein the proposed use is to be located or of permitted or legally established uses in adjacent use districts. &280-143 C. The x effect that the location of the proposed use and location that entrances and exists� may- � have upon the creation or undue increase of vehicular traffic congestion on � p g streets, highways or sidewalks to assure the public safety. ' " � � '���, a '^=v n,3' As with the above-noted conflict, nearby businesses including 7-11,,�,Ivy,League, BI,Ue Duck BakeryThe Giving Room and nearby residential properties will ° , ,- �alhbe�forced;fo�r'2.` endure the additional traffic congestion, and increased accident potential``cre'ateii''b'y'� the proposed action, especially with respect to special events. `��='t •�.�'`' ,, ° ,ti�,�� a�:��°�,�(, i tv.ti_tlr'^ ��_ ' �,, -..yam nrr•y'J 280-142 C. That the safety, the health the welfare the comfort the_convenierice order of the Town will not be adversely affected by the proposed uits�loca'tioh. Protecting the nature of the place I 'y a d'tfOZ � r Mo •.F mt ; High volumes of traffic during peak traffic periods and seasons, in a project area that is « already identified as having a high crash site(Figure 4.7 Crash Locations and High Crash Intersections in Town of Southold, Comprehensive Plan, page 123), will inevitably compromise the present safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience and SPIN,Iorder of the surrounding area. xIM "g 280-142 D. That the use will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes and �•, � �,�,, � intent of this chapter & 280-142 E. That the use will be compatible with its surroundings and with the character of the neighborhood of the community in general. '; t.� y ., particularly with regard to visibility, scale and overall appearance. There is no question that the proposed action, with its expansive "footprint", rooftop lounge, spa, event space, restaurant and lodging units will consume the vast majority of the entire site and impart substantial human activity, noise, traffic, lighting and the mo-; •aEa� -;� �� , �;,� F� `� nearly complete elimination of existing natural areas on the property. ; x f •f 4 � ,30 Conclusion: The Special Exception Permit is not an as-of-right use, and the Zoning Board of Appeals clearly has discretionary authority to deny a special exception application if the proposal cannot conform to the duly adopted special exception standards outlined " = in the Town Code. ' ikkk - E Collectively, in Southold Town, the special exception standards are largely focused on the comfort, convenience, health, safety, and welfare of the community and the compatibility of the proposed use with surrounding land uses and neighborhood } wr. character. In the instant case, the proposed action is nothing less than a transformative proposal that will set a lasting precedent for the size and scale of new ' . and more intensive development within the hamlet of Southold. The subject application is not a minor commercial expansion, a modest commercial enterprise, or a proposal that is compatible with the hamlet's character, history, development intensity, or the hamlet's well recognized infrastructure limitations (most notably its roadway capacity or level of accident risk). To avoid the consequences of an arbitrary review, the subject proposal osal must be considered alongside Southold Town's numerous land-use recommendations and the municipality's unambiguous long-term vision for the town's future (as clearly articulated in the recently adopted Southold Town Comprehensive Plan, and ' overwhelmingly articulated by the testimony of town residents throughout the public, f*i; A, hearing process). .� f ;t= , •' ,; ,r�, � = To be clear, the substantial body of public hearing testimony provided to:the'ZBA-,has`,,.rz ' , $Y not been based on an emotional public reaction to the project as inaceurafel', o k ` p P 1 ( ,, by the developer), but rather, it reflects significant consistency with th'e tov_.,m s`-duly. ,'"y�,°�,�'����� J , i adopted comprehensive plan. On that point, the ZBA is reminded-that-under;Ne"w.York' State Town Law (Section 272-a) a municipality's comprehensive plan,must,all gb')with��t' f its land use regulation", including any zoning or special use permits"asset forth'iri'the r % pertinent part of the statue's definitions provided below: = : Protecting the nature of the place you Ove % ' ���``� b "land use regulation"means an ordinance or local law enacted b y f n e town for t regulation*� �� �, g n o any aspect of land use and community w' � � �. r . resource protection and includes any zoning, subdivision, special use ' 12t, permit or site plan regulation or any other regulation which prescribes the appropriate use of property or the scale, location and intensity of , Erol, r � development. As a result, the ZBA's consideration of the Town Code's special exception standards must be informed by the town's most current and duly adopted comprehensive plan. When considered in this light, we find no rational basis for the approval of an action of this size, scale and intensity and therefore recommend a rejection of the proposal as required under such circumstances by the Town Code. We believe the application should be denied or withdrawn and reconsidered prior to any resubmission. J,4 Thank you for taking the time to review our comments. Please contact me should you have any questions or concerns. I can be reached at �4fAn4,k4At` bdeluca@eastendenvironment.orci. ^ ,RS , Sincerely, Robert S. DeLuca President a y, Cc: Supervisor Scott Russell & Members of the Town Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Credentials of the Author _.,. � � Robert S. DeLuca has been a professional land-use practitioner focused on local and 'f ® o`ke ��.� regional planning and environmental assessment for the last 35 years. He holds B.S. act s: v ;^ s 'XI and M.S. degrees in Environmental Science and has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Group for the East End since 1992. DeLuca has also worked as a Biologist and Sr. Environmental Analyst with the Suffolk County Office of Ecology where he was responsible for the detailed review and agency commentary,rerlked-t"I s•,;~ fi,_ wr°4Ms,, l� the environmental review of hundreds of land use and development proposalsd­�,.j�.,-s�, `°` �'� " ` throughout DeLuca as taught continuing education-an •;ti . .`�' .R;�;,; � � '' thht Sfflk CtDLhtht tiiducation ;,�w V"I 1 � T undergraduate coursework related to state and local land-use and erivironmentah �a._• '41 � � �° `' policy for nearly 20 years, as an adjunct professor of Environmental•`Studies'for_-Lorig�' Island University, and served as an expert witness for a number of"environmenta"l;' • ,,;,. n lawsuits and government investigations of environmental crimes.,DeLuca's work,hbL§' been recognized by a wide array of civic and environmental organizations-,-- d' ss wv z� �J the USEPA, The Nature Conservancy, the Press Club of Long Island 'longi, slang ��• � � University s Student Government Association. . �� ; � Protecting the nature of the play u , NANCY ORIENTALS 295 LOCUST LANEq0S& PO BOX 770 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 November 1, 2021 � `i 0 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals s Town Hall Annex Bldg PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Enclaves Project Dear Sirs/Madams; As a full time resident of Southold since 1968 I am hoping that the Southold ZBA will take in account the issues that will arise if the Enclaves Project is constructed and operated as such. I have lived in this neighborhood since 1968 when my parents moved from Queens and purchased The Southold Inn on the Main Road which is now North Fork Table. The Southold Inn was also our primary home until 1976, when we purchased a home at 295 Locust Lane not far from the Main Road. To my knowledge the Enclaves are zoned in the historical business section of the town, within a highly residential community. In no way would this project be harmonious with the rest of the neighborhood, for several reasons that I will point out. —TRAFFIC-This is a high traffic section as it is with Seven/11 located directly across the street. Many contractors, trucks, deliveries take place in this area. The Blue Duck Bakery is also in close proximity along with Mullen Motors. As one who travels and lives in this section of the Main Road I can tell you first hand how difficult it is at times to make a proper left hand turn to head west on to Route 25. Sometimes it is due to traffic and at times it is due to other vehicles parked along the road by 7/11 that are blocking the view coming from the East, as well as the west. I can only image and speculate how difficult it will be with a Hotel/Spa Event venue in place. The trade parade alone will clog up all of our main roads. I have also taken note that the principles involved in this project are not contracting with any local contractors, so yes, expect a huge Trade Parade heading onto our I I I North Fork Jin order to get this project built. I understand a traffic study was done that suggests a left hand turning lane but where WO that leave the sidewalks? And how will traffic on Locust Lane be handled, makes no sense. &2 —NOISE- This neighborhood is a mix of businesses and residence. A Event space so close to residential neighbors just would not fit in with the harmony of the neighborhood. As it is, the noise from recent events at North Fork Table is heard loud and clear at my residence and very disturbing. The recent private events are heard all over the neighborhood with bands, DJ, and announcers on loud speakers. Being that;the principle owners at North Fork Table will be the same as The Enclaves, I would expect the same disrespect to town noise codes. I also noted that they are planning a rooftop bar...that will have birdseye view of my home and property along with the neighbors which will !also carry the noise further out into the neighborhood. This is a major1concern, along with privacy issues. NMASTERPLAN- Is The Enclaves a project that is within the so called ""Masterplan of Southold Town. It appears that the principles involved with The Enclaves also owns the former Heron Suites and Caci location along wi,tk North Fork Table, property to the west of North Fork Table and Einstein Square. It seems as if they are using Southold Town as their own monopoly board and could be very detrimental to the characteriof Southold Town. Frankly, the design of The Enclaves does not fit into the character of the Village at all. I remember when 7/Eleven was built and there was an issue with the signage and it had to be of al certain look to fit in. The Enclaves does not in any way fit into to the look or Masterplan of Southold at all. It replicates the South Fork style. —ENVIRONMENTAL- How is this size project not going to impact the neighboring environment is my major questions. With increase traffic, additional water & electrical grid consumption, sewage issues. Parking lot drainage issues, pool waste. There is also the question of employees to run the facility. Where will they live or commute from. As it i's many businesses struggle with finding employees to run businesses that already exist. The North Fork only has two major roads that run East & west, we simply do not have the infrastructure to handle more cars, more tourist & more people. Founders Landing Beach is;also highlighted as a beach that the Enclaves believe they can take over by shuttling their guests over for the day. This is a small, very small, iconic, neighborhood beach. Shuttling people over will destroy this small bayside beach. I In summary, I along with many of my neighbors are not in favor of The Enclaves moving forward. I have pointed out the many issues. Along with the premise of once it is built, it will'be change the character of this small Village forever. It will also allow others to want to jump ons the chance to follow suit with more and more developments to mirror want has happened to the South Fork. There is already a proposal in the works for another very similar facility in Cutchogue�. I am hoping that the Board can take another good look at this project and realize that it is not a good fit for the Village of Southold. Sincerely, Nancy Ori I ntale NOV Q 8 2021 norientale@me.com 631-765-3985 i I � i i I I Fuentes, Kim From: Susan Boyles <billsueb@optonline.net> Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2021 10:14 AM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: The Enclaves My husband and I are very much against The Enclaves Project. It is too big a,nd;will-cause traffic issues, noise issues, staffing problems, and most importantly change the future of Southold town. Most of us live here and not on the South Fork or up the island because of the uniqueness and rural climate of our town. A project of this magnitude is absolutely not necessary or welcome. Thank you, Susan Boyles Sent from my iPhone ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. j s 11 � q �c odadweiki 14Ueilve SOuf dl NV [jq 7l MonAI of Move4ov- �OAy Eric, Pcv*5 hDO�� Pv 'oard of 4 ��lS ©�r,, K'►l91 U71, 5�3�s Rov+-e �5 Sov-rho Id !!4 :7/ I (' Paii 4-e S. �� y✓r'l�� *0 Sfax-e wl fo4AI4�,�?Q�fio7! PD-f- At f t-6 f cS'a( a-4 5� �7 �vU ,S ,Th P,po S`ed f,.A Wee/ VL/ -F6"Gve''Y A Vic I(c j e OF sa Aof �PleasC de,n pas'4. The. t-owt, o�- �du�-Ud (`s s�cve)-6gr 4/- Veal eslafe. ovr p, rjcujhral food is f�e m osf 6Xpe��ive of- any Sfq� 6ej-l-je.5- Pczv-q Yl MO auk' 4efe I'S iiaf- one hoose- l;s� - b,- ul7de(` f M I11;6l7 dof(01,5- jj I C044"I ve 5 i /1 0 U -d v- 60 ���✓ /04y r'es;den; ver e✓P17-4' ��y ��y � �� e , Vo� W'Ci Waa-F ©Vr Vrlto- G 4-a �la✓'e tea. �Ae[ s���c� I� a 47 Sed 1f� fi�a iS SGT Sv�e �i/I 'cc lel - i i I D, avAfswvd_ker 50Qfk61�� ` �q �� 140V D8 2021 iA16vem6er Ori cik ©� -M� p d r� 8oard uMp ea(S 10 4I( ` j�73�S go vte- aS - - - ocr o1� NY /III/ ACampgCa-, —(--wrr�f�i fv staff � � o�P®St i��_ f t�'►6 fj�cpaSQ�- ct4 �{O��j t"Yavfe,�S So vF�of .�'; (a�e . C pro��5� n &vs ( be-Pew( _ �6 a. Ic&/M, fesldwf, 4,01,pe du lea.---Is?Y ilea. i j �v eve/7t Space th15 -5-1-Z e M fie VI'llo- e o�P 5c V4-bc)1d iS ;flog CLCQ fable' a Wel 03 AI's- S% � �.0 A-e Uf l a -r-Q Id 1s P �- l y� d �� 1� aor aCcef,41e'= Va-f (eSJe4S ( I16641'fri�- fi��, ��1s c©�✓sf��cf%oma? f Bks ���,�-, o ver-C 0� 41r we l �"WZ 2/G//�� 0 So-vfAold (blou (d rule s� I -is ase � 6e, � domede o?ul' c i " � C1.� � �U � J f wi ���-_s��e� a�d� s e wl��+_fie -��I wo v ld _, �O /, r y v,4Ay 6mt Awl cerel y i _ t �Outl V(,- v 4\/m 0 Ao IdIRF IMP AN ��n 0 �� OG wo Nmv Ooddi�7 T i, -en avyl 1.✓Co n S'f�tfe Iny foW Qve"S 9Q/,-/ y `��]� ��a� `� �oaWaV((l�y�, vts-6o r� and /pct d i n Savik 1 f3l�l d ci,r(fnil y✓ol'r i �'e Gn iG Gift G/�.fa�1 �� a��G� ���Wrrt CC3 arL y } �rof®s4 MOtt- dF//I; r -- 'flaprMddl� D� oar 1r'(ay�,`l^G� iS pC�n Co u b al ar M y �O-f�b f pjoLW in o rtr f o ,✓n,, 6,)4- xl d -r7 0 u ����a Jc e- - a/?, ����'� Dpovydd- v6v� kvd pnenr %S a1r1d PX�s� kc ee �e vvc)u � w� e � l e�fs . ; near ��� w��lerr s rk Uery w ll � I t��- v , d ho d 3i r vt tJ p (n� wv Jia CC 4x4 b(cc2fe, y � 1 - jaY e (kel- NOV 0 3 2021 vem Le d4tw(61 �/y ffi c keu.r my tea . o dM *Ie- p1lopoSe -�Cllcl ayes Poilf "l QP- /' l ai l E�d f n �.U'l�a�G O-p a u f�ie f�.�q� D0�`� af7d /�'a r�e) In � �c��, ���-�,yh f�����, a I.Ld a ui-tlwly wads -t-F 6��17pali` oq,ov,lq Com P', co tv Pct yV4[(, �i�r�e/�� a 1,-? S-.v-f 4o fd, of n-d j C�T&,P- 4PG,4+ . ` x II cc r IS lG�n iS MUfC/ ocnd -COU bink 04' a.V✓ody-re � a �oF�l a� y����fS aCe f�;s S-�e. 7e valla e /`sIctce T nr) owe, d uf.T4af f A6 C( q d 6V )f m vS�- riel4a;n . Q prov e,)l W di' `/ �e Q lcl U �.n fo e.(ye rI. V lea tw i✓e one mall inch r,e d d1 t4 0-u(, �- wn � S��yd d �v� n 6 e 6uv yr i JqmaWAlkel- ilk d Viec✓ i�f�Sf r`e Kqo eS Vt;fm a IQwn IM71 Vvrofe, Lei -a p oSif i-o.�c -6e fike pro f 4davu �c�el V �C�-5. - ail- -- '- -- 2 VlTuye -,O�,fc of drk a-- fkl &Io-ca( 61)limP.ss 6r ee1n f 01+ N"A olr bre. i to G7m pa sly l Poly(,fo D(-$eV fi-a y e1 a,?d Wh 'sk-� Mod. Th-6 rowl1 �h_w 6-Fet1,`e) _�lea(f,ter:-,m r f y , _ f -- FtG�►'l to -� 6- Gditofn AiS p c-- 6S-q1 if JnctCc�P�Iab to tgIq ei�Q4fi-S�czc� In m 1 Me, Vi /1accr_foil %-f wog rs v er e a _ �✓h [," Fe CA P y y 9 . n rOap wo ul� _gUie asa �-�e, 6v �ssfifses tIC)d 1d cl6s, 1'5_ 0 e((,✓oL) �� t t�v .Aad v'e� -re . � Flo . - , j �►�_ �o der' fur' -6cd (e /f p ee, , Tie-, -5 -A 1 Vv,� iq Gorvolo� t k -�-gw - -ro r 0 4e, b.Cy� r y i " f �ouodv' tw Avenv& Motiday �St �� Nvvetll 1-3ca.l -ZO4i✓� goar'd oP �PpeAfs o�✓��ali as y Sdvt�old, �l� 1i9�� - C9 w6m 1f Yhati ConGPi o, �m �q tonsf�te -1j Orr oS%fion f6rf e, pr'opo.r �tdaUtsI afi65�5 Alk J� i n Svu vk a t�o(d Vf vel -�5 ffcfoa� j mj/ff (fie ( e/1 j o 6In eVerrf 5-pQee- OrAiS S,'Fe- �/.// lcla )ye 4e Viltoye forever. 6u;1d aid develo j> il,? a./"as tLa-f Cr/?, vikeft 41,5 ye, OF dvdormear - a1read� Tt 15 t7d�Al ar nev-er �-�a�- (AIX,, kc J e, w( at avl- f-avn uv l� 6e In fwf lq+y y e6vS, Flea,�e, do ,7 D¢ joke 100 lyl my S�Ef>y �e'bv'a/'d, ✓ w k ,eri we-'u��e -already c®, -,v�is- 4 r, 5;�C'erd 4 - MAN BROWN 53B BROADHOLLOW ROAD I SUITE 301 / MELVILLE, NEW YORK 1 1 747 ALTMAN & D I L E O , LLP TEL 516-222-0222 1 FAX 516-222-13322 KBDA@BROWNALTMAN.COM I WWW.BROWNALTMAN.COM November 1, 2021 Via Federal Express Leslie Kanes- Weisman, Chairperson Town of Southold,Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Hall Annex Building �\; 2021 54375 Route 25 Southold,New York 11791 Attn: Kim Fuentes, Secretary to the Zoning Board of Appeals Re: In the matter of the Special Exception Permit Application ("SEP") of 56655 Main St LLC to develop the Enclaves Hotel & Restaurant (the "Enclaves") @ 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York(the "Property"); S.C.T.M. No.: 1000-63-03-015 Our File No.: 100-513-001 Dear Kim: Following the October 14, 2021, public hearing (the "SEP Hearing") before the Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") concerning the Enclaves SEP, particularly the Board's determination to leave the record open until November 4, 2021, for written submissions, enclosed you will find the following: • October 29, 2021 correspondence from Giambertone & Associates Architects in reply to comments made at the SEP Hearing and in further support of the Enclaves SEP; and • November 1, 2021 Memorandum from Brown Altman & DiLeo, LLP, attorneys for the application, in reply to comments made at the SEP Hearing and in further support of the Enclaves SEP. Please submit the enclosures to the ZBA in advance of their decision regarding the SEP and we respectfully ask that the Board duly consider the same. Kindly contact the undersigned should you have any questions or require any further information from our office or the applicant concerning the SEP. Thank you, in advance, for your courtesy and consideration. Very truly yours, Brown Altman & DiLeo, LLP By: (Djd N. Altman Encls. cc.: 56655 Main St LLC (w/ encls; via electronic mail) PWGC (attn.: Kim Gennaro; w/encls; via electronic mail) tJ BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x In the Matter of the Application of MEMORANDUM IN FURTHER SUPPORT 56655 MAIN ST LLC, Applicant, MOI w/regard to the property k/a 56655 Main Road, Southold,New York(S.C.T.M.No.: 1000-63-03- 015), for a Special Exception Permit to operate a resort hotel pursuant to §§ 280-35(B)(4) and 280-45(B)(2) of the Southold Zoning Ordinance. ---------------------------------------------------------------x TO THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT APPLICATION OF 56655 MAIN ST LLC: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT It is respectfully submitted that the Special Exception Permit Application("SEP")filed by 56655 MAIN ST LLC ("56655 MAIN ST" or the "Applicant") to construct and operate a resort hotel, known as the "Enclaves Hotel & Restaurant", at 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York (S.C.T.M. No.: District 1000, Section 63, Block 03, Lot 015) (the "Property") should be granted. 56655 MAIN ST has met its burden of proof commensurate with the relevant provisions of the Southold Zoning Ordinance and New York State Town Law through uncontroverted, thoroughly vetted, expert testimony and documentation based on recognized empiric data (collectively, "Expert Documentation", unless otherwise referred to specifically). Those opposed to 56655 MAIN ST's SEP failed to submit any Expert Documentation contrary to the Expert Documentation submitted by the Applicant. 1 Opposition to the SEP consisted of personal anecdotal testimony, speculation and conjecture and, in certain instances, conspiracy-theory, wholly unsupported by Expert Documentation, sound empiric evidence or the record before this Board. The law in New York is well-settled that generalized community concern, unsupported by Expert Documentation, is insufficient as a matter of law. Moreover, at the commencement of the October 14, 2021 SEP public hearing(the"SEP Hearing")this Board stated that the SEP will be decided on the facts and the law and that this Board's decision is not based on a"popularity contest". The uncontroverted facts and the law warrant approval of 56655 MAIN ST's SEP Application. On August 19,2021,this Board accepted the Final Environmental Impact Statement ("FEIS")prepared by the Applicant,which was thoroughly reviewed and commented upon by this Board and its independent consultants, Nelson Pope & Voorhis ("NP&V"). Appendix I of the FEIS contained a detailed analysis of the SEP Criteria provided under §§ 280-142 (General Standards) and 280-143 (Matters to be Considered) of the Southold Zoning Ordinance. On October 7, 2021, this Board issued a Positive written Findings Statement ("Findings Statement") consistent with 6 NYCRR Part 617.11. This Board, therefore, found that 56655 MAIN ST's SEP will not have an adverse environmental impact and that SEP at the Property is preferable to "as- of-right" development permitted under § 280-45(A) of the Zoning Ordinance. STATEMENT OF FACTS , The Applicant incorporates by reference, as if set forth more fully herein at length, the facts, circumstances and Expert Documentation in the: (1)Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS"); (2) FEIS; (3) Findings Statement; (4) record from the SEP Hearing; and (5) written post-SEP Hearing submissions made by 56655 MAIN ST, all in further support of the SEP. 2 POINT I ZI b0l��1`J GENERALIZED COMMUNITY OPPOSITION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE In New York the law is well-settled that generalized concerns or expressions of opposition from local residents, absent Expert Documentation, does not constitute substantial evidence. Generalized and unsubstantiated complaints from neighbors, "unsupported by empirical or expert evidence, are generally insufficient for a zoning board to base its decision (citations omitted)." Caspian Realty, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Greenburgh, 68 A.D.3d 62 (2d Dept. 2009); Eddy v. Neifer, 297 A.D.2d 410 (3d Dept. 2002). "A denial of a special permit must be supported by evidence in the record and may not be based solely upon community objection (citation omitted)." QuickchekCorp. v. Town of1slip, 166 A.D.3d 982(2d Dept.2018). Moreover, a zoning board's decision cannot be predicated on mere conclusory statements without written findings supported by the record. See Gabrielle Realty Corp. v. Bd. of Zoning Appeals of Vil. of Freeport,24 A.D.3d 550 (2d Dept. 2005);see also, PDHProperties LLC v. Planning Bd. of Town of Milton, 298 A.D.2d 684 (3d Dept. 2002); Tobin v. Bd. of Zoning Appeals of Inc. Vil. of Manorhaven, 295 A.D.2d 254 (2d Dept. 2002). 56655 MAIN ST submitted uncontroverted Expert Documentation which was reviewed, vetted, and accepted by this Board and its independent consultant,NP&V,the result of which is a fifty-three (53) page Positive Findings Statement. Those opposed to the SEP proferred nothing more than visceral anecdotal testimony,based solely on personal concern(hereinafter,"Opposition Testimony"), without any offer of Expert Documentation or empiric data. This Board is well aware that review of the SEP under the State Environmental Quality Review ("SEQR') lasted more than four (4) years and in that time those opposed to the SEP did not offer into the record 3 any Expert Documentation. Simply because certain vocal residents do not like 56655 MAIN ST's SEP is, in and of itself, insufficient to deny the SEP. A. UNSUBSTANTIATED TRAFFIC CONCERNS CANNOT SERVE AS A BASIS TO DENY 56655 MAIN ST's SEP There is no basis in the record before this Board to support the denial of 56655 MAIN ST's SEP on the basis that the Enclaves Hotel will result in adverse traffic impacts on the adjacent road system. Unsubstantiated and unfounded claims of local residents that traffic and/or parking conditions will be exacerbated that are unsupported by empiric data or expert opinion cannot serve as basis to deny a special use permit application. See 7-Eleven, Inc. v. Inc. Village of Mineola, 127 A.D.3d 1209(2d Dept. 2105); 7-Eleven, Inc. v. Inc. Village of Mineola,289 A.D.2d 250 (2d Dept. 2001). Opposition Testimony at the SEP Hearing consists of nothing more than generalized, unsupported, concerns regarding traffic and compatibility with the neighboring community and, as such, does not constitute substantial evidence. See 7-Eleven, Inc. v. Inc. Village of Mineola, 127 A.D.3d 1209 (2d Dept. 2105). POINT II A RESORT HOTEL IS A SPECIALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE HAMLET BUSINESS DISTRICT The Enclaves Hotel & Restaurant is a Specially Permitted Use in Southold's Hamlet Business District. Section 280-45(B)(2)of the Southold Zoning Ordinance provides that a"hotel" use is subject to the issuance of an SEP from this Board and the provisions of§ 280-35(B)(4) of the Zoning Ordinance. Section 280-35(B)(4)provides, as follows: (a) Minimum parcel size shall be five acres. 4 (nSV (b) The maximum number of guest units shall be: Y (1) One unit per 6,000 sf of land without public water or sewer. (2) One unit per 4,000 sf of land with public water and sewer. (c) No music, entertainment or loudspeaker system shall be audible from beyond the property line. (d) The maximum size of a guest unit shall be 600 sf. 56666 MAIN ST's SEP complies with the standards set forth in § 280-35(B)(4). Further, as detailed in the FEIS and Findings Statement and as stated by expert testimony at the SEP Hearing the SEP does not require anv variance relief. As heretofore mentioned,the FEIS accepted by this Board, at Appendix I thereof, contains a detailed written analysis of the SEP Criteria provided under §§ 280-142 and 280-143 of the Southold Zoning Ordinance. Further,this Board's Findings Statement provides: The EIS included a review of the proposed use against the Special Exception Use Permit standards presented in Chapter 280, Article XXV, §§ 280-142 and 143, as well as the applicable policies and recommendations included in the 2005 Town of Southold Hamlet Study and its 2007 updates, the 2001 Scenic Southold Corridor Management Plan, 2005 Long Island North Shore Heritage Management Plan, and Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program("LWRP"). Based on these analyses and in consideration of project location,setting,site conditions,project use and design, and adjustments and mitigations to address identified concerns during the process, the proposed project was assessed for general consistency to the required standards and consistency with applicable long-range planning goals and policies. (See Findings Statement at p: 21.) This Board then states in Finding 4 of the Finding Statement that"[t]he project is not expected to result in significant adverse environmental impacts based on land use, zoning, special use permit standards, and public planning policies subject to strict compliance to identified mitigation and project design features and any further standards or 5 v requirements that may be imposed by other involved agencies or the ZBA in consideration of the Special Exception Permit Application." (See Findings Statement at p. 22.) "Unlike a variance which gives permission to an owner to use property in a manner inconsistent with a local zoning ordinance(citation omitted), a special exception gives permission to use property in a way that is consistent with the zoning ordinance, although not necessarily allowed as of right. The significance of this distinction is that the `inclusion of the permitted use in the ordinance is tantamount to a legislative finding that the permitted use in in harmony with the general zoning plan and will not adversely affect the neighborhood [citations omitted]. Thus, the burden of proof on an owner seeking a special exception is lighter than that of an owner seeking a variance, the former only being required to show compliance with any legislatively imposed conditions on an otherwise permitted use, while the latter must show an undue hardship in complying with the ordinance (citation omitted)." Retail Property Trust v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Hempstead, 98 N.Y.2d 190(2002);see Matter of North Shore Steak House v. Board of Appeals of the Inc. Vil. of Thomaston, 30 N.Y.2d 238 (1972). Based on the record before this Board, 56655 MAIN ST has met its statutory obligations under the relevant sections of the Southold Zoning Ordinance and New York State Town Law. POINT III THIS BOARD'S FINDINGS STATEMENT CONSTITUTES A SUFIFICENT "HARD LOOK" THAT THIS HOTEL PROJECT MEETS THE SEP CRITERIA UNDER THE SOUTHOLD ZONING ORDINANCE On October 7, 2021, this Board, as the Lead Agency under SEQR, issued a Findings Statement and, by rule, was required to: 6 (1) consider the relevant environmental impacts, facts and conclusions disclosed in the final EIS; (2) weigh and balance relevant environmental impacts with social, economic and other considerations; (3)provide a rationale for the agency's decision; (4) certify that the requirements of this Part have been met; and (5) certify that consistent with social, economic and other essential considerations from among the reasonable alternatives available,the action is one that avoids or minimizes adverse environmental impacts to the maximum extent practicable, and that adverse environmental impacts will be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable by incorporating as conditions to the decision those mitigative measures that were identified as. practicable. 6 NYCRR 617.11(d)(1 —5). The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation's ("NYSDEC") highly respected and well recognized treatise, The SEAR Handbook,4th Ed. (2020),provides with respect to a Lead Agency's written findings: 1. A findings statement is a written document, prepared following acceptance of a final EIS that declares that all SEQR requirements for making decisions on an action have been met. The findings statement identifies the social and economic, as well as environmental, considerations that have been weighed in deciding to approve or disapprove an action. A positive findings statement means that, after consideration of the final EIS, the project or action can be approved, and the action chosen is the one that minimizes or avoids environmental impacts to the maximum extent practicable. For an action that can be approved, an agency's findings statement must articulate that agency's balancing of adverse environmental impacts against the needs for and benefits of the action. If the action cannot be approved based on analyses in the final EIS, a negative findings statement must be prepared, documenting the reasons for the denial. 7 Each involved agency, not only the lead agency, must prepare its own SEQR findings following acceptance of a final EIS. Findings state the basis for substantive aspects of each agency's decision, including supporting any conditions to be imposed b theagency. p P Y Whether findings support approval or denial of an action, the agency's reasoning must be stated in the form of facts and conclusions that are derived from.the final EIS. See SEQR Handbook, 4th Ed. (2020) at p. 145. Given this Board's Findings Statement and the "hard-look" contained therein, this Board should grant 56655 MAIN ST's SEP. An adverse SEP determination by this Board is contrary to the Findings Statement and the findings contained therein. Should this Board deny the SEP or impose additional conditions not otherwise considered in the Findings Statement or at the SEP Hearing, respectfully, the same is without foundation or merit. (See Matter of WEOK Broadcasting Corp. v. Planning Bd. of Town of Lloyd, 79 N.Y.2d 373 (1992); see also,Matter of Veysey v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of Glens Falls, 154 A.D.2d 819 (3d Dept. 1989), lv. dnd. 75 N.Y.2d 708 (1990)). POINT IV "SMALL EVENTS" ARE A PERMITTED ACCESSORY USE AT A RESORT HOTEL AND THIS BOARD'S INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT DETERMINED THAT MITIGATION MEASURES ARE NOT REQUIRED This Board,through its Findings Statement,expressed for the first time concern with regard to the frequency of "small events" at the Enclaves Hotel,' (see Findings Statement at p. 22), however,the ZBA does not define a"small event". Further, at the SEP Hearing this Board again mentioned "small events", but failed to explain the same or to provide the Applicant with any "'Small events",a term yet to be defined by the Board,was not raised as a consideration during a four(4)year SEQR review process. 8 objective criteria or conditions regarding "small events". Respectfully, the Board's Findings Statement and the recommendations made by NP&V foreclose the regulation of"small events".2 The Southold Zoning Ordinance permits weddings, anniversary parties, conferences and similar events as an accessory use to the hotel. Weddings and similar private gatherings, limited to the Property, are permitted accessory uses under the Ordinance. Chapter 280, Art. 1 (General Provisions), § 280-4 defines a"resort hotel" as: A building or ground of buildings,whether detached or in connected units, containing individual guest units consisting of a room arranged or designed to be available for use as sleeping quarters for transient on a daily rental basis or for vacationers or other persons on a weekly basis,provided that one such unit may connect directly with not more than on other such unit. Each unit shall have a door opening on the exterior of the building or on a common hallway leading to the exterior. A `resort motel' may include such accessory uses as a beach cabana, private dock, dining room, restaurant or swimming pool, conference and meeting facilities or an accessory convenience shop, office or personal service facility, provided that such facility or shop is located within the building without any external sign or display and off-street parking facilities. The term `resort motel' shall not be construed to include a`transient motel' or `mobile home park."' Southold Town Code; Chptr. 280, Art. 1 (General Provisions; Definitions). Given the definition of"resort hotel", set forth above, weddings and similar events are contemplated as accessory uses or functions, wherein "dining rooms", "restaurants", "swimming pools" and "conference and meeting facilities" are permitted as part of the principal hotel use. (See Brophy v. Town of Olive 'Although the ZBA's Findings Statement did not define or otherwise clarify the term"small event", for purposes of this Memoranda a "small event" is a wedding, anniversary, conference or similar event of less than 100 persons. During the FEIS review process the Board's independent consultant, NP&V, determined that a "large event" is attended by 100 persons or more, not to exceed 250 persons. This determination was arrived at by the ZBA's independent traffic consultant and accepted by this Board as an objective threshold criteria for mitigating potential traffic impacts from"large events". Events of less than 100 persons were,therefore, deemed not to have an adverse traffic impact and the Findings Statement is bereft of any fact-based discussion requiring the need for mitigation measures regarding events of less than 100 persons. 9 (� r Zoning Board of Appeals, 166 A.D.3d 1123 (3d Dept. 2018). See also December 8, 2020 correspondence from Brown Altman&DiLeo, LLP, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "1). The Southold Zoning Ordinance's definition of an accessory use mirrors Brophy, supra, stating that an accessory use is "a use customarily incidental and subordinate to the main use on a lot, whether such `accessory use' is conducted in a principal or accessory building." Historically, weddings and similar events are customary and incidental functions at a hotel use. In addition, Southold's Zoning Ordinance does not limit the number of accessory events, such as weddings, anniversary parties, conferences. Since this Board and its independent consultants did not find that "small events" have an adverse impact and the Applicant testified at the SEP Hearing that events will be accessory to the hotel use, the imposition of additional conditions restricting or otherwise limiting "small events" constitutes an impermissible regulation of business activity through zoning. Conversely, zoning boards may not impose conditions which are unrelated to the purposes of zoning. (See St. Onge v. Donovan, 71 N.Y.2d 507, 516-17, 527 N.Y.S.2d 721, 725 (1988) citing 2 Anderson, New York Zoning Law and Practice § 23.55 [3d ed.]; and Matter of Dexter v. Town Bd., 36 N.Y.2d 102, 105, 365 N.Y.S.2d 506 (1975)). Such conditions are invalid because they do not seek to ameliorate the effects of the land use at issue and are, thus, unrelated to the legitimate purposes of zoning. (See Old Country Burgers Co., Inc. v. Town Bd. Of Town of Oyster Bay, 160 A.D.2d 805, 806. (2d Dept. 1990) (holding that a condition of a special permit for a fast food restaurant that prohibits the use of the drive-thru during certain hours was an"impermissible attempt to regulate details of the operation"). The Court further held that the conditions of approval"must relate directly to the proposed use of the real property, and not to the manner of the operation of the particular enterprises conducted on the premises." Id. 10 The unwarranted imposition of conditions limiting or otherwise regulating"small events", absent a rational basis in the record based on fact and empiric data, is contrary to applicable law and the Southold Zoning Ordinance. CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth herein, as well as the FEIS, Findings Statement, and the record before this Board, 56655 MAIN ST's SEP should be granted. 56655 MAIN ST demonstrated, by uncontroverted Expert Documentation,that the SEP complies with and,in many instances,exceeds the applicable requirements of the Southold Zoning Ordinance and New York State Town Law. Conversely, those opposed to the SEP have offered nothing more than anecdotal evidence, based solely on personal considerations, without any offer of Expert Documentation. This Board acknowledged, and properly so,that its decision must be based on the law and the facts. In this instance, the law and the facts in the record warrant issuance of the SEP to 5665 MAIN ST. Dated: Melville,New York November 1, 2021 Yours, etc., tidkn Altman&DiLeo, LLP Attorneys for 56655 Main St LLC Office &P.O. Address 538 Broadhollow Road, Suite 301 W Melville,New York 11787 (516) 222-0222 daltmang bro wnaltman.cons TO: Leslie Kanes-Weisman, Chairperson Town of Southold,Zoning Board of Appeals Office &P.O. Address Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 11 EHIBPI' 1 ®NAL B R O W N 538 BROADHOLLOW ROAD I SUITE 301 MELVILLE, NEW YORK 11747 ALTMAN & D L E 0 , LLP TEL 51 6-222-0222 ! FAX 51 6-222-0322 KBOA@BROWNALTMAN.COM WWW.BROWNALTMAN.COM V December 8, 2020 V Via Electronic Mail Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold • Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 Attn: Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Re: Special Exception Use Permit application and State Environmental Quality Review Act("SEQRA")review(collectively,the"Application")to the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") by 56655 Main St LLC ("56655 LLC") in connection with the hotel project (the "Development Project") to be located @ 56655 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971; SCTM No.: 1000-63-3-15 (the"Property") Our File No.: 100-513-001 Dear Chairperson Weisman and Fellow Board Members: We are counsel to 56655 LLC and offer this correspondence in response to the October 30, 2020 comment memorandum(the"Memo")from the ZBA's consultant,Nelson,Pope&Voorhis, LLC("NPV"),concerning the draft Final Environmental Impact Statement("FEIS")regarding the Development Project. The Memo,respectfully,is a rehash of two(2)themes that appear to remain a concern of the ZBA, namely,noise and traffic. As more fully set-forth hereinafter, 56655 LLC and its project team have thoroughly addressed comments from the ZBA and the public regarding noise and traffic through the submission of uncontroverted expert testimony and documentation. The Memo, absent fact-based comment or empiric data, seeks to have 56655 LLC unnecessarily revisit and reconsider questions/comments that have already been asked and answered. The ZBA is well aware of the extensive time, effort and serious consideration that 56655 LLC and its project team has made since 2017 regarding the Development Project,yet,there seems to remain a misconception regarding the same. As such, 56655 LLC requests a Work Session Meeting on December 17, 2020, with the ZBA to review and discuss the Memo and the Development Project. At the ZBA's November 7, 2019 meeting("11/7 Meeting") 56655 LLC,together with the ZBA,reviewed and discussed Traffic Studies and Noise.Studies performed,in advance of the 11/7 Meeting,by 56655 LLC. These very same topics were subsequently considered through additional Traffic and Sound studies (performed at the ZBA's request). Recently, on October 30, 2020, NP&V requested (as set forth in the Memo)that 56655 LLC perform and provide a Traffic Gap � @ X-A, BR❑WN I ALTMAN ® DILEO , LLP Study during "peak season" and, with little time, left, 56655 LLC performed the Gap Study at significant expense. In summary, 56655 LLC has met and complied with the ZBA's reasonable requests for information, throughout,regarding the Development Project. TRAFFIC STUDIES 56655 LLC's Development Project Traffic and Parking Studies ("Traffic Studies") were prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates and Stonefield Engineering, respectively (collectively referred to as, "DEA"), utilizing, among other well recognized data sources and methodology, Institute of Transportation Engineers ("ITE") Trip Generation Manual and actual field studies/vehicle counts.' DEA's Traffic Studies.concluded that the impact to the surrounding road system and traffic volume was negligible and on-site parking sufficient, even finding that"the 7- Eleven across the street generates twice the amount of traffic" than will be generated by the Development Project. Neither the Memo nor any other submission made to this Board offers any recognized empiric data or study disputing DEA's Traffic Studies. Community objection has been nothing more than generalized claims and, as a matter of law, generalized community objection is insufficient to rebut expert testimony and/or analysis based on empiric data. SOUND STUDIES Further, 56655 LLC submitted noise analysis and sound attenuation studies ("Noise Studies")prepared by Sound Sense LLC("SS"). The Noise Studies objectively measured,without limitation: (i) the impact of potential vehicular noise produced by the Development Project; (ii) sound levels produced on-site by groups of individuals; and (iii) amplified sound (i.e., music) occurring at outdoor accessory events. With the aid of the Traffic Studies,the Noise Studies found that there will be no significant impact to neighboring properties or the surrounding community from the Development Project. Further, analysis was done in connection with sound levels generated outdoors by groups of people, on-site, determined that there will be no significant adverse impact to neighboring parcels and the Development Project will comply with the Town's Noise Ordinance. Concerning utilization of amplified sound, SS offered the use of movable sound barriers and,in addition,electronic sound limiters,that are integrated into the public address system effectively reducing the sound produced to 65 dba, consistent with §180 of the Town Code. Similar to the unsubstantiated concerns voiced regarding Development Project traffic, concern raised regarding noise is without merit. No empiric data, study or expert report has been submitted contrary to the expert documentation submitted by 56655 LLC. For example,the Memo states, in relevant part, that to mitigate sound coming from the Development Project that the Applicant should use "passive mitigation" measures rather than "active mitigation" measures, however, the Memo's author does not provide rational support for this premise nor any objective study or data which demonstrates that "passive mitigation" is more effective than "active mitigation."2 The goal of the noise mitigation should be just that,the mitigation of noise regardless The ITE manual is the industry standard source for traffic engineers when preparing traffic and parking studies, including trip generation estimates. Z The Memo's author conveniently fails to acknowledge the evident shortcomings of"passive mitigation"measures, which typically remain static, not subject to adjustment based on circumstances. Whereas, "active mitigation" 2 r BROWN ALTMAN Sc ®� DILE❑ , LLP of the methodology and 56655 LLC has indicated its intent to meet the Town's Noise Ordinance requirements. Whether this method used is "passive" or"active"is irrelevant.3 ' 4ALONE, Jv THE ZBA S RELIANCE ON §280-35(B)( )(c), o T IS CONTRARY TO LAW Contrary to the position taken by NP&V in the Memo,mere "audibility", alone,is not the legal standard by which on-site noise is measured under the Town Code. Town Code §280- 35(B)(4)(c) provides that in connection with a hotel use, "no music, entertainment or loudspeaker system shall be audible beyond the property line. ,4 (Emphasis supplied.) As such, the Memo's author erroneous claims that any sound that is capable of being heard at the property line is, therefore, impermissible. Respectfully, such a standard of measure is, on its face,, flawed because it is vague, subjective and incapable of quantitative measurement.5, The aforementioned provision of the Ordinance does not provide any methodology,procedure or verifiable criteria for determining whether noise is audible"beyond the property line." Moreover,to determine whether noise produced from the Development Project is "audible"beyond the"property line" effectively requires 56655 LLC and/or its representatives/employees to trespass onto adjacent property(ies) to measure sound levels, something 56655 LLC cannot do. In addition, it is a well settled principal of legal construct that when an ordinance contains both subjective general standards and objective specific standards regulating a specific use, then, the entity with jurisdiction must look to the specific objective standards of the Ordinance. Chapter 180 (Prevention of Noise) of the Town regulates noise pollution in the Town and is controlling herein. Chapter180 contains, among other things, an: (i) objective stated purpose; (ii) defined terms;(iii)objective and quantifiable criteria for measuring sound; and(iv) and specified uses that are exempt from the provisions of Chapter 180.6 Chapter 180 provides objective and distinct guidelines regulating noise, while §280-35(B)(4)(c) offers, literally, no guidance at all. As such, Chapter 180 of the Code governs the control of noise generated on-site by the Development Project. WEDDINGS AND SIMILAR EVENTS ARE PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES The Memo's author, at several points throughout, suggests that noise impacts from "special events" can altogether be mitigated by eliminating such"special events"at the Property. measures can be adjusted and relocated to address changes in circumstance. Moreover,the Memo's author implies, without a good faith basis,that"active mitigation"measures will be less effective because the same can be manipulated by the operator. 3 In addition, it bears mention that the Development Project architect designed the hotel building with the residential neighbors to the east in mind,as the building itself provides an ample buffer from on-site generated noise by directing the same within the hotel courtyard. a Section 280-35(B)(4)(c)applies to"music,entertainment or loudspeaker systems",only,and does not,by the express terms of the statute,apply to any other sound generated on-site. s See December 7,2020 Sound Sense Report. Art.VII of the Ordinance does not contain any provision which expressly states that Chapter 180 of the Code does not apply to hotel uses, such as that contemplated by 56655 LLC. Similarly, there is nothing in Chapter 180 of the Code that expressly states its regulatory framework does not apply to Chapter 280,Art.VII 3 BROWN ALTMAN & � � �. Di LEO , LLP Respectfully, weddings and similar .events (i.e., birthday parties, Bar and Bat 'Mitzvahs, Anniversaries, etc.) are not "special events" as that term is defined under § 205-2 of the Town Code(Public Entertainment and Special Events). Section 205-2 defines a"special event"'as: As used in this-chapter,the following terms shall have the meanings indicated: SPECIAL EVENT — Any temporary gathering, demonstration, performance, exhibition, amusement or' activity that is not currently a permitted use of the property in the applicable:zoning district or which requires a parking area to accommodate all vehicles transporting attendees to the event that is larger than the existing parking capacity of the site that is conducted or sponsored by a person, organization, entity or association, including, but not limited to, carnivals, circuses, fairs,,bazaars, outdoor shows and concerts, parades, walks, runs, marathons, bicycle races or motorcycle rallies, which may involve one or more of the following: A. The closing of.a public street. B. The use, blocking or restriction of Town property, roads or rights-of-way; C. The use of amplified sound exceeding the standards set forth in Chapter 180 of the Town Code. D. The sale of merchandise,that is not ordinarily sold in the normal course of the applicant's business. E. The sale or service of food to the public with the exception of the following: (1) On land used in agricultural production, the sale or service of food products composed primarily of ingredients produced on site; or (2') On land used in agricultural production that maintains a winery or farm winery license issued by the New York State Liquor Authority, the sale or service of food items which customarily complement wine tastings and that are ordinarily consumed while standing or walking and without the need for utensils. F. The substantial increase or disruption of the normal flow of traffic on any street or highway. G. The placement of portable toilets. H. The placement of temporary no-parking or directional signs or banners. 4 f • . Y ti BROWN I ,� I ALTMAN & + � J DiLEo , LLP The use of any Town services that would not be necessary in the absence of such an event. Southold Town Code; Chptr. 205, Art. 1 (General Provisions; Definitions). It is evident that weddings and similar events,,as generally described above, are not "special events" within the definition of the Code. Weddings and similar private gatherings, limited to the Property, are permitted accessory uses under the Ordinance. Chapter 280, Art. 1 (General Provisions), § 280-4 defines a "resort hotel"as: A building or ground of buildings,whether detached or in connected units, containing individual guest units consisting of a room arranged or designed to be,available for use as sleeping quarters for transient on a daily rental basis.or for vacationers or other persons on a weekly basis,provided that one such unit may connect directly with not more than on other such unit. Each unit shall have a door opening on the exterior of the building or on a common hallway leading to the exterior. A`resort motel' may include such accessory uses as a beach cabana, private dock, dining room, restaurant or swimming pool, conference and meeting facilities or an accessory convenience shop, office or personal service facility, provided that such facility or shop is located within the building without any external sign or display and off-street parking facilities. The term `resort motel' shall not be construed to include a`transient motel' or `mobile home park."' Southold Town Code; Chptr. 280, Art. 1 (General Provisions; Definitions). Given the definition of"resort hotel", set forth above, weddings and similar events are contemplated as accessory uses or functions at the Development Project, wherein "dining rooms", "restaurants", "swimming pools" and "conference and meeting facilities" are permitted as part of the principal hotel use to facilitate the same. See Brophy v. Town of Olive Zoning Board of Appeals, 2018 WL 5669734, 2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 07388 (3d Dept). In Brophy, the Town of Olive Zoning Board of Appeals ("TOZBA") found, following a public hearing, that weddings were a permitted accessory use, customary and incidental to a bed and breakfast use (`B&B Use"). Both the TOZBA and,thereafter,the Court found that weddings were, in fact,,accessory to the B&B Use. Weddings were held on a seasonal basis between May and October, the number of weddings were limited to approximately 12 per season, and the B&B Use operated year-round. Here, 56655 LLC seeks to limit weddings and similar events to a 'The Court went further in stating that"determining whether a proposed accessory use is incidental and customarily found in connection with the principal use of the property is,to a great extent,fact-based. Resolution of the accessory use question depends upon an analysis of the nature and character of the principal use of the land in question in relation to the accessory use, taking into consideration the over-all character of the particular area in question." 5 BROWN ar X14 kohl - — ---- ALTMAN & WiNs, DILEO , LLP seasonal basis,between April and October and the number of such events from 10—12 per season, while the hotel will be operated on a year-round basis. In addition;the author of the Memo fails to take into consideration other hotels and similar facilities operating in the Town of Southold or elsewhere on Long Island',s North Fork that hold weddings and similar events that are customary and incidental functions to their principal uses. The Town Code's definition of-an accessory use mirrors Brophy, stating_that an accessory use is "a use customarily incidental and subordinate to the main use on a lot, whether such `accessory use'is conducted in a principal or accessory building." Historically,weddings and similar events are customary and incidental functions to a hotel use.' As such,claim made by the Memo's author that weddings and similar events should be eliminated from the Development Project appears to be an impermissible attempt to regulate otherwise permissible business operations. Further, NPV's recommendation,arguably,reaches beyond the purview of the SEQRA process and,likely, the ZBA's jurisdiction. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Many of the recommendations contained in the Memo also cut against the Town's stated objectives in its recently updated Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"). In particular Chapter 7—Economic Development, expressly supports the development of commercial property in the Hamlet Business ("HB") District, stating that one of the many objectives of the Comprehensive Plan is to "promote a blend of commercial and residential use in the HB zoning district; all residential use would create a school district deficit in educating the children that would resultfrom an all-residential scenario, and would also result in a loss ofbusiness use in,the hamlets within a zoning district speciftcally created for hamlet businesses. In addition, such an outcome would add schoolchildren and would not achieve a tax positive situation for school districts." Respectfully, 56655 LLC's Development Project addresses many of the stated objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, as the project: (i) brings new commercial use into the HB zoning district; (ii) brings business to the Property and promotes foot traffic to businesses in the HB District;(iii)will boost tax revenues to the Town through,among other things,hotel occupancy taxes, sales taxes and increased property taxes; and (iv) avoids an underutilization of the Town's HB District and a further degradation of the Town's limited economic base. In addition, benefits that will be realized by the Town's residents include the creation of full-time and part-time jobs in the service industry which, according to Chapter 2—Demographics of the Comprehensive Plan, is one of the most under-represented business sectors in the Town making up only nine-percent (9%) of the recognized occupations in the Town. In addition to creating jobs in the service industry, 56655 LLC's business operations will help bring down the unemployment rate in the Hamlet of Southold which, according the Comprehensive Plan, has the fifth(5`")highest rate of unemployment(7.3%) in the entire Town. a Here,weddings and similar events are,unquestionably,an"accessory use"due to their seasonal nature and the hotel is the principal use based on, among other things, its year round operation. By their seasonal nature,weddings and similar events can only be considered an accessory use. 6 BROWN ALTMAN & i DiLEO , LLP CONCLUSION We respectfully request that the ZBA adopt the draft FEIS as final and complete and we ask to be heard a Work Session Meeting at ZBA's December 17, 2020 meeting or, in the alternative, that a public hearing be immediately ,scheduled regarding 56655 LLC's pending Special Exception Application. We look forward to your prompt response. Thank you, in advance, f6r your courtesy and anticipated cooperation. Very truly yours, Brown Altman&DiLeo, LLP By: A'at 'AQP�' (Dzvj)lN. Altman cc.: Southold Town Attorney(attn.: William Duffy, Esq., Southold Town Attorney; via email) 56655 Main Road, LLC(via email,only) PWGC (attn.: Kim Gennaro-Oancea,AICP CEP and Bryan Grogan, PE; via email, only) 7 ,�v -V, October 29, 2021 Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Town of Southold, Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 Re: In the matter of the Special Exception Permit Application of 56655 Main St LLC to develop the Enclaves Hotel& Restaurant @ 56655 Main Road, Southold, Neu, York(S.C.T.M. No.: 1000-63-03-015) Dear Chairperson Weisman, and Members of the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals, First, I'd like to commend the Board and in particular the Chairperson on your efforts at the October 14, 2021 hearing (the "Hearing") to maintain a sense of decorum with the attendees and I thank you for your collective patience. Further, I thank you for recognizing my right, as an applicant, to be heard without interruption and the opportunity to complete my presentation as it was important to have my presentation, in its entirety, on the record. Second, there are a few items I would like to add as the record remains open until November 4, 2021 for written submission. Founder's Landing: With respect to the use of the Founder's Landing Beach, we will contact the Board there to determine if there is a way, in terms of limited day passes etc., where hotel guests can use the beach. Contrary to certain claims made at the Hearing, I do not envision hotel guests ever turning into "500 drunken partiers who will whoop it up through all hours of the night". In fact, that is not physically possible because the hotel cannot and will not accommodate that many guests. Nonetheless, if it is the desire of the Founder's Landing Association to prohibit use the beach by hotel guests, then, we will respect their wishes. 62 Elm Street, Huntington, NY 11743 Tel, (631) 367-0050 o Fax(631) 367;6636 o AVCS@DGiambertoneArch1tects.corn P 2 C • Comments relating to Noise from other establishments: There were a number of comments raised by speakers at the Hearing,and one in particular that comes to mind was Nancy from Cutchogue who cited the noise emanating from the"Roadhouse"bar and grill. Understanding that this is the frame of reference most of the residents have is important. It was evident from the residents' testimony at the Hearing that they were either unaware or simply did not appreciate the extensive and costly noise attenuation factors that we have made to this development project. I can only surmise that had other businesses in Southold been required to implement the noise attenuation measures incorporated into this development project that their concerns would have been far less. • Business Environment/ Financial Viability: One of the residents raised the issue of whether or not this was considered a financially viable project in light of escalating Construction costs and, if it was not, would the Hotel end up as Section 8 Government Housing. What I can say in response to this was we embarked upon this project only after having done several feasibility studies,all of which indicated that this project is financially sound. Even with a 50%occupancy rate we can sustain the viability of this development project. Moreover, a dear friend of ours recently built a 20-room boutique Hotel in Riverhead(The Preston House). He also was told it would never be financially viable,yet he saw the need for Hotel space on the North Fork and built it. Today he enjoys 100% occupancy in the summer months and near 85%occupancy in the winter months. The same holds true for many of the hotels in Greenport. We would not embark on an investment of this magnitude without conducting the requisite due diligence to assure ourselves of the success of the project, in the context of a very conservative analysis. Further, with regard to potential large events (i.e., 100 — 250 persons), in the context of what has been proposed, remember, the purpose of such events is to help offset the anticipated off-season reduction in business. While there are likely to be events during the summer months, the focus is to augment income in the off season through holding such events and, respectfully, the fears related to large events are unfounded. Moreover, the target demographic for this hotel project is different from that of the local Bed and Breakfast establishments or Air B&B's (collectively, "B&B's"). We do not believe that there is any appreciable concern for competition between this hotel project and B&B's in this demographic. (I am advised by our attorneys that economic competition is not valid basis for rendering a zoning decision.) Respectfully,we believe the opposite to be true,that spill over from this hotel project will help boost the occupancy B&B's, in particular when the hotel is fully occupied for some of the events at the hotel. • Hotel Guest Spa, Proposed Enclosed Event Space: In addition,I believe that there may be a misunderstanding by this Board and, possibly, the public with regard to the potential enclosed 6,600 sf Event Space (hereinafter, "Event Space") and the basement level guest spa("Guest Spa"). First, we never sought to develop the basement level of the hotel with an accessory use other than the Guest Spa. We intend,and the floor plans before this Board (and part of this Special Exception Permit Application) reflect, that the basement will be developed with a Guest Spa. It was at this Board's insistence that the Guest Spa be limited to hotel guests,only, and we have agreed to the same. flyA" I1a � 3 Moreover, with respect to the Event Space, this Board, along with the public, knows that we initially sought to hold events (i.e., weddings, anniversary parties, birthday parties (collectively,"Events"))outdoors,during the warm weather,on the lawn(south side of the hotel)and/or pool area. In response to comments from this Board and the public regarding noise concerns and in consultation with the Board's independent consultant, Nelson Pope &Voohris("NP&V")following our December 8,2020 FEIS submission,we modified our plan for outdoor Events. During this Board's February 4,2021 Work Session Meeting we were asked by NP&V to hold Events indoors to mitigate concerns regarding noise and it was this recommendation that resulted in the Event Space. In subsequently accepting our FEIS and, thereafter, on October 7, 2021, issuing a positive SEQRA Findings Statement this Board found the future Event Space to be a reasonable and acceptable means of hosting events at the hotel, while mitigating noise concerns. Further, our sound consultant, SoundSense,following consultation with this Board's independent consultants, found that the future Event Space adequately mitigates noise concerns and there has been no expert testimony, documentation or empiric data offered to the contrary. The Guest Spa and the Event Space will be distinct parts and house different use at the hotel. Although I did not appreciate the tenor of some of the residents' comments rendered at the hearing, I do appreciate where they are coming from,and the fact that they are largely based upon fear of the unknown. Unfortunately, most of that fear was generated by misinformation, speculation, and a conscious desire to ignore the extensive factual findings, expert testimony and expert studies contained in the record before this Board. Those opposing the Enclaves Hotel application did not offer or submit any expert testimony, expert witness reports or controvert the empiric data reviewed, scrutinized and accepted by this Board and its independent consultants to arrive at the findings in the October 7, 2021 SEQRA Findings Statement ("Findings Statement"). In my 35 or so years of practice as a licensed architect I have been involved in a number of substantial development projects and I have never seen a document as substantial and thorough as the FEIS accepted by this Board for this project.At the Hearing there was no one who offered any acceptable,quantifiable or verifiable evidence andlor data as we have presented to this Board, has been accepted by your experts, and incorporated in the Findings Statement. We genuinely appreciate the fact that many Southold residents would like to capture and preserve the essence of what life was like in the 1950's or 1960's. Every year that goes by they see the advance of new development carrying them further away from that ideal. We understand that, but, we are genuinely different because we are a truly involved part of the community that is Southold. My Partner came to Southold 12 years ago and was mesmerized by the charm and bucolic ambiance that Southold embodied at the time and he convinced me of the same when we decided to buy the subject property. Nonetheless, through our respective relationships with many different people in Southold we encountered multi-generational residents who realize that, although quaint,many of the prime staples of downtown Southold were quite literally falling apart. Individually, they recognized that they did not have the financial ability to address the degradation of downtown Southold's business community,however,collectively they believed that they could make an impact. The North Fork Table is a prime example of people in this community uniting to create a successful business that provides jobs and a better place to live and work.The building that houses the North Fork Table was in terrible physical condition, in danger of imminent collapse. Regardless, this group of investors spent considerable sums of money to bring the North Fork Table back to its Glory as one of the pre-eminent Restaurants on Long Island. In speaking about this "Group of Investors", it is a group of people who bring their individual talents and passions together to genuinely make a difference in the community they all call home and love so much. rige 14 This group includes a Multi-generational Building Company, who have been born and raised in Southold. It also includes a multi-generation family of marina owners, also long-time hard- working residents, who have made and continue to make a vested interest in this community. Rounding out the group is a multi-generational family of Cabinetmakers, who now also do large scale renovation projects but have been a presence in Southold since the 50's, and have several generations of their extended family residing full and part time in Southold. These people have a sincere passion for what Southold is all about and are willing to step up and to try to improve the Southold community and I am honored to be a part of this contingent. Take a look at the before and after images of Heron Suites, Einstein Square, the North Fork table and you will see the tangible benefits of their extensive efforts. In summary, the property that is the subject of this Special Exception Application it is a 6.75-acre parcel of land in the Hamlet Business District. A hotel is identified by the Comprehensive Master Plan and the Zoning Code as a permitted use, with a Special Exemption Permit from this Board in this Zone.The development of this hotel project, as proposed,complies with and in many instances exceeds the guidelines set forth in the Southold Zoning Code. This Board, following more than 4 years of extensive and carefully considered review, determined in its Findings Statement that the Enclaves Hotel project will, on balance, be beneficial to Southold and, in fact, is preferable to "as-of-right"development permitted in the Hamlet Business District. The analysis and scrutiny that the Enclaves Hotel project was subject to sets a very high- bar for future projects in Southold. Imagine if some of the nuisance establishments cited by the opposition at the Hearing had been subject to the same level of scrutiny, required the same extensive and costly mitigation measures as this project? We respectfully ask this Board to look beyond the conjecture, fear, speculation and raw emotion and consider the evidence and facts, as you have done in your Findings Statement. As such we respectfully request that you approve our application for a Special Exemption permit for the Enclaves Project. Sincerely, 56655 ain St By: ndrew . iambertone ember Southold Zoning Board 1 54375 Main Rd. P.O. Box 1179 �� �. h Southold,NY 11971 November 3, 2021 /1 0466 Dear Chairperson Leslie Weisman and Members of the Southold Zoning Board, I hope this finds everyone well. In a letter to you a month ago, I voiced my opposition to the Enclaves Hotel and Spa project in Southold. After attending the Town Hall meeting on Oct. 14, where I listened, learned and asked questions at the podium, I write again to reiterate my stance. I am a third generation homeowner on a street that is just a few minutes walk to this proposed project site. My family has been paying property taxes on a home and/or homes on the same street since 1940 - 81 consecutive years since my grandparents bought;their cottage here. I have known Southold my whole life. I love this area and think I understand the rules that govern it, and it seems clear to me that the Enclaves project is not in keeping with development for our hamlet. It is overbearing, out-of-scale and out-of-character in its appearance, compared with existing development in our vicinity - notwithstanding its sibling "Southold General,"which made its debut recently. (This is the only section of this letter that is an opinion, promise. I was excited for the unveiling of"Einstein Square" and wandered into the store enthusiastically. It appeared clean and white. It brought to mind Dean &Deluca from 1980s Soho/New York City, and I thought, "This aesthetic in Southold?" Despite its old timey name"Southold General"the store/cafe does not in any way feel "Founded in 1640,"rather, "Wannabe Anywhere." The Rothman buildings that were "renovated" are gone forever, though the developers were kind to leave some original shingles on the sides. The space is a glorified "Ikea"with its chintzy windows and facade wrapped in white and black plastic. Despite its sweet origin story, the Andy ;Warhol-like facsimile picture of Rothman and Einstein feels gimmicky. I assume that in the hands of the same developers, The Enclaves project will perpetuate this charmless aesthetic on steroids. Will the Albertson house/soon-to-be restaurant also be restored in plastic? Where is the "country" ambiance or North Fork aesthetic?As our Zoning Board, do you want this kind of soulless development to be your legacy?) But let's get to the facts - traffic for instance. The Enclaves project traffic surveyor (from West Hampton was it? Yes, I'm sure the traffic on the NoFo is better than on his Fork, so apparently case closed), argued that this development would not adversely affect safety on the Main Road and the convenience of road users. WHAT? There is one direction in and out of Founders Landing by road -the Main Road. We who live here already have a hard time making a safe left or right hand turn out of Cottage Place, Locust and Town Harbor Lanes to the Main Road, especially in high season. Yet everything this hotel compound is to become, every move it will make,will involve more vehicular traffic on the Main Road - the road we use to get to and from our homes. Imagine the dizzying whirl of Page 2 cement mixers, fork lifts, bull dozers, flatbed trucks, and later,the year-round barrage of laundry services, sanitation trucks, landscapers and leaf blowers, food and beverage deliveries, taxis, wine tour and beer barn limos, shuttle buses and employees and guests coming and going. Driving in this neighborhood is already treacherous, especially in high season, due to the unbelievable activity in our streets. The Enclaves will further squeeze us in and exacerbate this problem in an area already out of control. It is unfathomable to me that this project got as far as it did without insisting the property have a service and guest entrance and exit from the back of its grounds on the North Road! How could you conscionable green light this knowing it will most definitely strangulate the Main Road and directly impact those of us in this neighborhood, a number of whom are elderly? What is our Town Supervisor going to do? What is the Department of Highways going to do? What is the Zoning Board going to do? Will the town create sidewalks and bike lanes for the residents of our Founders Landing community to safely walk and pedal and roll to the IGA and Post Office? We should all be walking more. That would be progress. But it's not just road traffic. The adverse effect of building this project in this unacceptably high density location which constitutes over-development also promises noise, loss of privacy and potential overcrowding of our local beaches, including the beach at Founders Landing. Why did our Town Supervisor Scott Russell recently sell off our community beach rights to hotels and other lodgings? The timing of this move is curious, as now the Enclaves project will have legal access to our community beaches. One wonders what the developers will dream up as concerns, despite their lawyer stating in public at the Town Hall Meeting "It is not their intention to use Founders Landing beach."Meanwhile, Founders Landing beach is a small, shallow-watered beach frequented by parents, grandparents and young children. The bulk of it has swing sets and a slide, for heavens sake. It is not a resort hotel beach right for roped off Campari-branded umbrellas and chaise lounges reserved for patrons. This is just one example of one beach. The Enclaves developers will forever change the nature of all of our beaches if we let them. Please the generations of residents who have worked their whole lives to be here. Why would the town alienate its core constituency in this way? And who are these generations of neighbors? Founders Landing community is one of modest cottages with a rich history, many owned by women heads of household, a significant portion of whom are elderly/have outlived their spouses. Along Hobart Road alone there are seven such women I know of. mothers, grandmothers, nurses, teachers, professionals, retirees, artists and widows. (My own grandmother and mother were also widows here.) Their homes are on Hobart Road, Korn Road, Cottage Place, Founders Path, Daly Lane, Hoey Lane, Locust Lane, Town Harbor Lane, and Town Harbor Terrace and their names are Julie, Val, Eileen, Terry, Kathryn, Hannah,Nancy B, Eleanor, Joanne, Dawn, another Nancy B, Marilyn D, Marilyn M, Eve, Laura. Who are they?They are the backbone of a community that suddenly finds itself in a fight with a hotshot developer, that's who. Do you know what else these women are? "Discerning" -the curious term used by the lawyer for the Enclaves project when he spoke at the Town Hall Meeting on Oct. 14. He was referring to the intended clientele of the hotel complex. What he neglected to mention is that the lovely Founders Landing area he sees ripe for the plundering is brought to you by discerning women who have cared for their cottages and families for decades. I guess they/we did a nice job, because these developers are coming in to eat our lunch. We have made living here attractive, 1 Page S and the equivalent of a hyena Hotelier is stealing from us what has been hard won. (What woman hasn't worked her fingers to the bone for what she has?) In fact,the location of this project and its underhanded roll out feels conspiratorial, as though there was an assumption the Founders Landing community of women, widows, the elderly, seasonal home owners and some new to the neighborhood would be an easy mark and easily railroaded. This reeks of misogyny and ageism. Call it whatever. It is heartless. Where is the justice? It is 2021, and the world is emerging into the light from a modern-day plague. We are recalibrating. As Southold makes its way forward, I dream that we put our minds to a truly progressive future, including guarding our natural resources - fresh air, clean drinking water, the well being of what lives in our waters,the well being of those who live and work and visit here, access to fresh food, fewer toxic pesticides, safe roads, walkable, bikeable pathways, healthy trees and flora and fauna, healthcare,tolerance of each other. Kindness. What we do not need more of in our small, congested town in this location is construction, traffic, chaos, light and noise pollution compliments of a new hotel and spa compound that is not in the interest of its own citizens. We are on the brink, but it is still livable here. We can still salvage any wreck. But, if the Enclaves project goes forward, it will change our town forever. And its footnote will include your names. We have work to do and the resources to do it. Our friends and neighbors are our greatest asset. Street by street in our Founders Landing neighborhood, we have each other's back. For generations we have cared about Southold, and in return, we hope that our town leaders will have our backs and listen to us. Please, reconsider the Enclaves. Vote to cease and desist on this project. Sincerely, MJ Brennan Citizen/Homeowner 725 Hobart Road Southold,NY 11971 i s avEr) October 29,2021 (Nov 0 4 2021 PO Box 105 Southold,NY 11971 ZONAIC,IBOARD OF qpp A� Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Rd P.O.Box 1179 ns6z- Southold, NY 11971 `C Dear Board Members, I am writing today to express my great dismay concerning the project called The Enclaves.I grew up in Southold and have now retired on the North Fork. The character of this town,expressed by both its physical beauty and its local people, is why I choose to be here.This project is in direct conflict with that character. The architecture of the proposed building is not at all in keeping with the rest of the town.It truly looks like something one would find in Arizona or southern California. The size of the hotel is enormous in light of the lot it is planning to use, perhaps not in exact measurements,but certainly in the way it will feel to guests, sandwiched between a very busy road and the railroad tracks with only one road in or out.I also question the safety of this arrangement—one way out while fire trucks and police are trying to get in to help a situation? The traffic the hotel will create will bring gridlock and a very unsafe situation at a place that is already busy enough and will create back ups of cars wanting to turn east from the bakery,juice bar, coffee place and 7- Eleven. None of the perks of having a hotel in the village will be extended to community members.It will be exclusively by,for and about out of town guests. That is not a good nor fair use of a prime village location. Unfortunately,if the builders changed that policy they would have no extra parking for locals to use the facilities anyway.They are already shoehorning in all they can and yet still do not have enough parking for the many workers who will need to drive in from points west where they can barely afford to live on the low salaries they will receive in this kind of establishment.It's not a place that will in any way help the economic development of our village. The builders of this project have the right to build a hotel if that's what they see would be a good business.However,I disagree with the need for a hotel in the village because I feel people exploring the North Fork would rather stay in an AirBnB type of room or a regular B and B or a room on a working farm or vineyard.If they want to stay in a high end place like this proposal, they can go to the Hamptons or a number of other places on the island.We do not need to become what already exists elsewhere. Indeed, we have a responsibility to cultivate the ways we are different and to engage visitors in our uniqueness. We need to pass laws encoura�- local people to re-imagine their dwellir'��% and provide low cost housing for locals and workers as well as intimate places to stay for visitors. If the builders of this project truly want to offer something that would be exciting for visitors as well as adding to the community for locals,they would design this project to be more in keeping with the character of the /nu town and also find a better spot for its construction—like on the North Road or elsewhere in town with room for safer access. Thank you for considering my thoughts and for taking on this very difficult task of finding the best way forward for our town. Lisa Michel 831-234-3693 f R��EIV c0 NANCY ORIENTALE, 0� 0 4 2029 295 LOCUST LANE PO BOX 770 , gotl,K�a0ARD of APS .t: SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 � November 1 2021 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Annex Bldg PO Box 1179 Southold', NY 11971 RE: Enclaves Project Dear Sirs/Madams; As a full time resident of Southold since 1968 I am hoping that the Southold ZBA will take in account the issues that will arise if the 'Enclaves Project is constructed and operated as such. I have lived in this neighborhood since 1968 when my parents moved from Queens and purchased The Southold Inn on the Main Road which is now North Fork Table. The Southold Inn was also our primary home until 1976, when we purchased a home at 295 Locust Lane not far , from the Main Road. To my knowledge the Enclaves are zoned in the historical business. section of the town, within a highly residential community. In no way would this project be harmonious with,the rest of the neighborhood, for several reasons that I will point out. —TRAFFIC-This is a high traffic section as it is with Seven/11 located directly across the street. Many contractors, trucks, deliveries take place in,this area. The Blue Duck Bakery is also in close proximity along with Mullen Motors. As one who travels and lives in this section of the Main Road I can tell you first hand how difficult it is at times-to make a proper left hand turn to head west on to Route.25. Sometimes it is due to traffic and at times it is due to other vehicles parked along the road by 7/11 that are blocking the view coming from the East, as well as the west. I can only image and speculate how difficult it will be with a Hotel/Spa Event venue in place. The trade parade alone will clog up all of our main roads. I have also taken note that the principles involved in this project are not contracting with any local contractors, so yes, expect a huge Trade Parade heading onto our North Fork in order to get this project built. I understand a traffic study was done that suggests a left hand turning lane but where would that leave the sidewalks? And how will traffic on Locust Lane be handled, makes, no sense. —NOISE- This neighborhood is a mix of businesses and residence. A Event space so close to residential neighbors just would not fit in with the harmony of the neighborhood. As it is, the noise from recent events at North Fork Table is heard loud and clear at my residence and very disturbing. The recent private events are heard all over the neighborhood with bands, DJ, and announcers on loud speakers. Being that,the principle owners at North Fork Table will be the same as The Enclaves, I would expect the same disrespect to town noise codes. I also noted that they are planning a rooftop bar...that will have birdseye view of my home and property along with the neighbors which will also carry the noise further out into the neighborhood. This is a major concern, along with privacy issues. NMASTERPLAN- Is The Enclaves a project that is within the•so called "Masterplan of Southold Town. It appears that the principles involved with The Enclaves also owns the former Heron Suites and Caci location along with North Fork Table, property to the west of North Fork Table and Einstein Square. It seems as if they are using Southold Town as their own monopoly board and could be very detrimental to the character of Southold Town. Frankly, the design of The Enclaves does not fit into the character of the Village at all. I remember when 7/Eleven was built and there was an issue with-the signage and it had to be of a certain look to fit in. The Enclaves does not in any way fit into to the look or Masterplan of Southold at all. It replicates the South Fork style. —ENVIRONMENTAL- How is this size project not going to impact the neighboring environment is my major questions. With increase traffic, additional water & electrical grid consumption, sewage issues. Parking lot drainage issues, pool waste. There is also the question of employees to run the facility. Where will they live or commute from. As it is many businesses struggle with finding employees to run businesses that already exist. The North Fork only has two major roads that run East & west, we simply Ao not have the infrastructure to handle more cars, more tourist & more people. Founders Landing Beach is also highlighted as a beach that the Enclaves believe they can take over by shuttling their guests over for the day. This is a small, very small, iconic, neighborhood beach. Shuttling people over will destroy this small bayside beach. I 1 i I In summary, I along with many of my neighbors are not in favor of The,Enclaves moving forward. I have pointed out the many issues. Along-with the premise of once it is built, it will be change the character of this small Village forever. , It will also allow others to want to jump on the chance to follow suit with more and more developments to mirror_want has happened to the South Fork. There is already a proposal in the works for another very similar facility in Cutchogue. I am hoping that the Board can take another good look at this project and realize that it is not a good fit for the Village of Southold. Sincerely, N,ancy7nktale r orientale@me.com 631-765-3985 Fuentes, Kim l From: Noncarrow, Denis Sent: Thursday, November 4, 2021 8:09 AM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: FW: [SPAM] - Fwd: Sincere request to the Zoning Board re: building of proposed large hotels FYI if you didn't get this. Thanks Kim NOV 4 2021 Denis Noncarrow Government Liaison Officer Town of Southold, New York J ' www.southoldtownny.gov denisn @southoldtownn y,gov 631-765-5806 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication with its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication. From: Diane Niebling [mailto:dniebling@ymail.com] Sent: Monday, November 1, 202112:25 PM To: Noncarrow, Denis<denisn@southoldtownny.gov> Subject: [SPAM] - Fwd: Sincere request to the Zoning Board re: building of proposed large hotels Hi Denis, thank you for returning my call. I did find the email address but will also forward this to you as well. Thx so much! Diane Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Diane Niebling<dnieblingCz��inail.com> Date: November 1, 2021 at 11:31:42 AM EDT To: donnawa,southoldtownny.g�ov Subject: Fwd: Sincere request to the Zoning Board re: building of proposed large hotels Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Diane Niebling <dluebling(ivymail.coin> Date: October 31, 2021 at 3:53:24 PM To Whom it May Concern. i My husband& I, as homeowners in Cutchogue, as well as many of our neighbors &friends, are deeply disturbed to hear that 2 large hotels are being proposed to be built in Cutchogue & Southold. We purchased our home on the North Fork in 1989 for the small town values and it's similarity to New England, atmosphere & the type of community we wished to live in. We did not want the commercialization or glitz of the South Fork. The quality of our quaint, quiet towns will disappear if these larger hotels with their large capacity ball rooms & large parking lots are built. The traffic will increase exponentially on an already choked road system. Making a left out of King Kullen already means taking your life in your hands. With a hotel across the street it would be impossible to get in or out& sure many accidents would ensue. It could take hours longer to go anywhere. These hotels would change the very nature of why we wanted to live in an idyllic place in the historic town of Southold. The tranquility, the beauty & the wonderful town main streets we know& love. If we didn't , we would have gone someplace else. Every time I ride from Cutchogue to Greenport, I admire the beautiful historic homes, churches &tasteful & beautiful buildings. I appreciate all the beauty of this lovely area. I love the values they represent& for us,that is the American Dream of living in a small, quiet community. It will be disturbing and change the nature of our beautiful towns forever in a way that will be so detrimental to the North Fork's identity. We love all the vineyards & farm stands. I'm sure I'm not alone in voicing these concerns and thank you for giving us the opportunity to beseech the Zoning Board to reconsider this building project to save the things we love & value most about North Fork life. Respectfully, Diane&Laurence Niebling Sent from my iPhone i 2 November 4, 2021 To the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals: PLEASE VOTE NO AND DISALLOW THE ENCLAVES It is that simple! Voting NO to the Enclaves means YES to so much more. p g I cannot claim being a founding family member, or being born or raised here, but I love it here no less. My wife,a long-time resident, introduced me to Southold and the North Fork in September 1996. 1 remember it so clearly. A glorious September day.There is no need to explain because I know that you know what I am talking about. My eyes widened and my heart melted at the beauty.The beauty of seemingly little-touched nature,fresh salt air and the ever presence of civility—now known to fewer and fewer towns and cities. At that moment, I confessed my desire to live here.We planned, we saved and happily purchased our first house here in 2000.And,for 20 summers our children grew up here and learned to love, appreciate and respect this special place.We moved here permanently in 2020, not because of the pandemic, but because that was the plan. My family and I recognized and honored the efforts of Southold predecessors who had the courage and conviction to vote NO countless times.Their NO votes to unneeded, unwanted and unwarranted "development" represented YES votes to the values rooted here hundreds of years ago. A simple life filled with love, family,friends and community—and in concert with nature and our obligation to protect it. It's an easy recipe. Permitting the Enclaves, or other similar projects will erase years, decades and centuries of hard work, hard thought and hard decisions,that in hindsight were right decisions. Voting NO to the Enclaves is voting YES to those who made the hard decisions for and before us to mold this special place. Kind Regards Joseph Buczek 3895 Wells Ave Southold NY 11971 631-876-5559 Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 11/4/2021 �I Town Hall Annex Building U� 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 I e . , Emailed: kim.fuentes@town.southold.ny.us NOV 42021 Subject: Enclave Hotel—Another Overcrowded LI Drunkfest Now Ruins Southold .JI:cUI Dear Zoning Board of Appeals, Enclave Hotel will destroy the quaint, quiet and rural character of Southold hamlet.The developer's document submittals/statements grossly understate the total Enclave population and ignores the adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood, especially Rt. 25 traffic, and the Founders Landing neighborhood to the south. Enclave's impact statements fail to assess the adverse impact(e.g.,economic,overcrowding,quality of life,etc.) to the adjacent Founders Landing neighborhood and beaches. Based on similar east-end hotel occupancy trends, it is realistic that Enclave hotel rooms will be overcrowded with 8 to 10 guests per room. As such,44 rooms translates to 440 transients,74 seat restaurant(plus standing patrons is over 100 guests) plus employees, deliveries, and distracted drivers plus Enclave's proposed catering hall. This is out of character for the Southold business hamlet and violates the stated intent of Town's Code for general character. There are—200 homes in Founders Landing to the south of Enclave. Enclave is increasing our neighborhood with the equivalent of adding—100 new homes on their 6.75 acre lot. Enclave's proposal is inconsistent with the business hamlet's historical character that is currently more comparable to Northport,Cold Spring Harbor or Stony Brook Village. Enclave belongs in Long Beach. Overcrowding Southold hamlet with hundreds of party-goers is lucrative for the Enclave owners but will ruin the residents'quality of life as it has in so many LI business districts,especially Founders Landing neighbors. The technical content of the Enclave impact statements are,typically, not understood by bureaucrats and they rely on the consultants'summaries. The consultants'statements &reports, including Enclave's,are highly subjective and biased and based on the acceptable practice of professional discretion and assumptions and avoids alternate scenarios that conceal legitimate, undesirable concerns. In particular,the sound (noise) impact statements and traffic studies grossly minimize the negative impact. Even the occupancy is grossly understated, per Code,with 2 occupants per room. Enclave guests will chronically overwhelm Founders Landing beaches and neighborhood with hundreds of transients every day, all summer&fall. According to Code, "No music, entertainment or loudspeaker system shall be audible from beyond the property line." Enclave's impact statement claims that a restaurant with a roof top bar and several hundred transient hotel guests complies with the Town noise code is technical fraud. It is well known that active and passive noise controls are ineffective as the Nelson and Pope's study confirms. A one hundred foot deep vegetative sound buffer provides an adequate sound buffer between neighbors, not the few feet of trees as proposed by Enclave. The Enclave impact studies/statements do not consider the impact of: 1. The economic impact(loss)to Founders Landing home values. 2. Adverse effect on Founders Landing neighborhood due to large influx of Enclave transient beach and park visitors. 3. The town end beach on Town Harbor Lane has—12 parking spaces. As such,the Town Harbor Lane road end beach was not intended to, nor could it,accommodate hundreds of chronic,transient hotel beach guests. Enclave will chronically overcrowd this beach and Founders Landing with hundreds of transients. -The Town and developer has completely failed to adequately evaluate the impact of the chronic surge of Enclave hotel transients that will overcrowd southward into Founders Landing neighborhood and beach. Enclave plans to hold 8 to 12 special events per year and more to come. Tourist season is—4 months. This translates to 3 events per month as another example of quality of life decline for residents such as road closures. According to Town Code, residents will expect the following traffic hardships during special Events several times per month on Rt 25 (quoted in part): vz "A.The closing of a public street. jtx,."t�5 B.The use, blocking or restriction of Town property, roads or rights-of-way; C.The use of amplified sound exceeding the standards set forth in Chapter 180 of the Town Code. D.The sale of merchandise that is not ordinarily sold in the normal course of the applicant's business. E.The sale or service of food to the public with the exception of the following:.............. F.The substantial increase or disruption of the normal flow of traffic on any street or highway. G.The placement of portable toilets. H.The placement of temporary no-parking or directional signs or banners. I.The use of any Town services that would not be necessary in the absence of such an event." Ironically,Code Article 1 Para 280-2 D."The prevention and reduction of traffic congestion so as to promote efficient and safe circulation of vehicles and pedestrians."is supposed to prevent the traffic problems Enclave will create. However,the Town may allow Enclave to intentionally create avoidable traffic problems. Regarding beach overcrowding: During Covid,June 23, 2020, an Executive Order approved beach passes as follows: ".....Hotel-motel passes are now accepted for entrance and those who operate businesses in the hospitality industry should contact the Clerk's Office at(631)765-1800.....". The Enclave impact studies and Town fail to identify how Founders Landing beaches can accommodate the chronic overcrowding of Enclave transients. This includes the Founders Landing road end beach and Founders Landing District Park. What is the Town doing to protect our home values and quality of life? Recent North Fork development is increasingly becoming more of the same South Fork&western LI trash that many came here to avoid. The deep, rural history of the North Fork's character is being quickly erased, rather than embraced,with focused intent towards another overcrowded, money greed fest. Enclave is forcing itself into an inappropriate location with biased engineering studies that have failed other downtown areas on U. Their biased impact analysis of traffic, noise,etc. deceptively conceals the adverse quality of life decline to be revealed only after it is built. How many more villages do we have to ruin before we admit this broken business model only benefits developers and merchants? It is Long Island's ubiquitous business model that is a nightmare for residents. Worship of money is their priority over quality of life for others. Enclave developers have property rights but not if it is at the expense of their neighbors' property rights. A crammed,dense-occupancy resort hotel out of the character for our hamlet business district and surrounding neighborhoods. When any such project is "jammed in" with congestion, inadequate buffers and roads,the local quality of life declines significantly for residents. We should not expect anything different from Enclave. To quote Einstein,the patron saint of Southold: "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." Enclave'overcrowded drunk-fest will destroy our quality of life as it has el ew re on Ll. During a 1939 Cutchogue summer rental, it is reported that a humble Einstein sailed a 17 foot sailboat and wore shorts supported by a rope for a belt. Enclave developers and Einstein Plaza co-owner should honor Einstein's humble intellect with hamlet development that promotes human intellect and a human quality of life that Einstein loved here. Einstein must be rolling over in his grave with this cheap commercialism &overcrowded Enclave drunk-fest. Our Town government representatives are missing an opportunity to adequately plan the Hamlet Business district: 1. Use Eminent Domain to create a road adjacent&parallel to the LIRR tracks to divert Enclave and future business traffic off of Rt.25. Eminent domain has been used elsewhere in the Town with the Dept.of Transportation.Also,a bike path should be created adjacent to the LIRR tracks through the business district continuous from Southold to Greenport. 2.Our government representatives must declare a moratorium on the Business Hamlet to assess the impact of future development. If Enclave is approved,our representatives have failed the residents and future of Southold and does not comply with Zoning, Article1, Para 280-2 E) The maximum protection of residential and historic areas. [Amended 1-10-1989 by L.L. No. 1-1989]" Why hasn't the Town pursued a moratorium in Southold hamlet similar to Mattituck? A moratorium was enacted for Mattituck on Rt. 25 business district in 2020 as follows (partial quote): "LOCAL LAW NO. 2020 A Local Law entitled, "A Local Law in relation to the Restoration and six(6) month Extension of a Temporary Moratorium on the issuance of approvals and/or permits for the parcels of property in "The State Route 25 Love Lane Intersection and surrounding area" BE IT ENACTED by the Town Board of the Town of Southold, as follows:.." In light of the issues presented above,Enclave fails to meet the Environmental Quality review requirements highlighted below: "§ 130-15 Required findings in written determination. [Amended 4-2-1996 by L.L. No. 1-1996] When the Town agency decides to carry out or approve an action which may have a significant effect on the environment, it shall make the following findings in a written determination: A. Consider the relevant environmental impacts, facts and conclusions disclosed in the final EIS. B. LC "i�iY We"Igh-'cand °ba�larrice"k relevant environmentalimpacfsR,Pvviths asocial `;Yecon9rt ic;: atitl;'°other C6nSid@t atlal l`S: C. Provide a rationale for the agency's decision. D. Certify that the requirements of this Part have been met. E. Certif t:-bon$i8teht,­' orisiderati0"nsf ioh­g;Jh6 sp,,,aVaIIabI6,­­t -,666"Ahat ids' or minimizes,,,,., I M , alternative h - avo _ppvers t, il exteh' ronmen nt6F`irh06c he,,'miax­i m u rr tal g - "ill­be­�.'a-Vbnd e-d"',"o'r- -or;itih ,,as to b g' !ye, R gt�� The Zoning Board of Appeals rules on variance or special use permits: The applicant must prove that the property is unable to achieve a reasonable return for any use allowed in that zoning district. 2) The applicant must prove that unique circumstances apply to the property for which the variance is requested. 3) The applicant must prove that the hardship is not self-created. As discussed above, Enclave's has other options that provide reasonable return that provide improved Code compliance and the impact statements that fail to meet this standard for Special Use. Enclave is creating their own hardships on Rt. 25 that are avoidable. Therefore, their current application should be denied since Code prohibits approval for hardships created by the applicant. Enclave's impact statements ignore the hardships imposed on residents of Founders Landing. At least one Code provision requires Enclave's impact statement to evaluate 500 feet from Enclave property. Portions of the Founders Landing residential neighbor are within 500 feet of Enclave and it is not adequately addressed as required by Code in Enclave's impact statements. The bottom line on Enclave? I paraphrase the Supreme Court's attempt to define pornography as it relates to Enclave, "It's hard to define but you know it when you see it." Enclave is an overcrowded, low grade drunk-fest that will ruin the residents' quality of life and set the precedent for future hamlet decline as witnessed in many LI towns. However, Enclave has a huge opportunity to create a high profit business model but creative thinking is needed. In the meantime, hopefully, our government will protect the residents' quality of life and enforce responsible merchants' development. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Ken Campanelli Resident, Founders Landing (Background: Engineering profession for -40 years, (Bach. of Eng'g and MBA-top 10% of class). =Lead nuclear Test Engineer, =Senior Energy Trading Analyst, =CUNY Manager of Energy Conservation programs, =Energy Performance Contracts Engg Mngr.(NY Metro area- Fortune 100), =power industry projects engineer, =Lead Cogeneration Engineer, =Executive Director - Facilities Mgmnt. & Planning (CUNY), =Statewide Director of Construction Oversight and QA for NYS Energy Research and Development Authority program.) BOARD MEMBERS OF SU�r Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �o�� yQIO 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantes Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Q Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning �Q �� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider �ycQ�(,�(,N Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net _ ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS D E C E � 11 ppE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 FEB ® 1 2017 MEMO Southold Town Planning Board TO: Planning Board FROM: Leslie K. Weisman, ZBA Chairperson DATE: February 1, 2017 SUBJECT: Request for Comments ZBA# 7046 56655 Main Rd. LLC (The Enclaves) The ZBA is reviewing the following application. Enclosed are copies of Building Department's Notice of Disapproval, ZBA application, current map on file. Your review and comments are requested at this time. The file is available for review of additional documentation at your convenience for reference if needed. APPLICANT TAX# ZBA# HEARING CODE DATE OF PREPARER ZONE DATE SECTION STAMPED OF SURVEY DIST SURVEY/SITE PLAN 56655 Main 1000-63- 7046 May 4, Art. X Sec. 7/8/16 John Minto Rd. LLC (The 3-15 2017 280-45 B (2) L.S. Enclaves) 8/23/16 PWGC Engineers Your comments are requested 1 week prior to hearing date. Thank you. Encls. BOARD MEMBERS ®f SOP Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ®�� y®� 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 ® Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantes Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning �o �® 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider - l�C®me� Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631) 765-1809•Fax(631) 765-9064 MEMO TO: ENGINEERING FROM: Leslie K. Weisman, ZBA Chairperson DATE: April 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Request for Comments ZBA#7046 — 56655 Main Street LLC (The Enclaves) "STORM WATER MANAGEMENT" The ZBA is reviewing the following application. Enclosed are copies of Building Department's Notice of Disapproval, ZBA application, current map on file. Your review and comments are requested at this time. The file is available for review of additional documentation at your convenience for reference if needed. APPLICANT TAX# ZBA# HEARING CODE DATE OF PREPARER ZONE DATE SECTION STAMPED OF SURVEY DIST SURVEY 56655 Main 1000-63.- 7046 Yet to be Art X Sec 280- 4/18/17 John Minto Street LLC 3-15 determined 45 13(2) (The Enclaves Your comments are requested 1 week prior to hearing date. Thank you. Encls. BOARD MEMBERStirf Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �O��OF SOUT�oI 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantesc Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Q Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning �� Y� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider lyevuffN, Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax (631)765-9064 February 1, 2017 Ms. Sarah Lansdale, Director Suffolk County Department of Planning P.O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 t Dear Ms. Lansdale : Please find enclosed the following application with related documents for review pursuant to Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code: ZBA File # 7046 Owner/Applicant : 56655 Main Rd. LLC (The Enclaves) Action Requested: Construct a two story 22 room hotel. Within 500 feet of: (X) State or County Road ( ) Waterway (Bay, Sound, or Estuary) ( ) Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State, Federal land. (X) Boundary of Agricultural District ( ) Boundary of any Village or Town If any other information is needed, please do not hesitate to call us. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman ZBA irperson By: Encls. BOARD MEMBERSS�FFU(� Town Hall Annex Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �y.0�o COGy` 54375 Route 25,Main Road Patricia Acampora,Member c P.O. Box 1179 Eric Dantes,Membery ,? Southold,NY 11971 Gerard Goehringer,Member %OS i �� Telephone(631)765-1892 Nicholas Planamento,Member �a0 Fax(631)765-6641 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 25, 2017 Suffolk County Department of Planning P.O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Attn: Ted Klein Dear Mr.Klein: Please find enclosed the following application with related documents for review pursuant to Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code: ZBA File #7046 AMENDED Owner/Applicant: 5665 Main Rd. LLC (The Enclaves) Action Requested: Construct deer'fence in front yard - height Within 500 feet of: (X) State or County Road ( ) Waterway (Bay, Sound, or Estuary) ( ) Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State, Federal land. (X) Boundary of Agricultural District ( ) Boundary of any Village or Town If any other information is needed, please do not hesitate to call us. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman ZBA Chairperson Bye Encls. d- BOARD MEMBERS ®f S®fir Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairpersons y �® 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 ® �® Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes C Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank Gerard P.Goehringer ® �� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento �i�c®� Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 May 17, 2017 CORRECTED Ted Klein Suffolk County Department of Planning P.O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Dear Mr. Klein; Please find enclosed the following application with related documents for review pursuant to Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code: ZBA File: #7046 — AMENDED Owner/Applicant: 5665 Main Road, LLC —The Enclaves (Hotel) Action Requested: Special Exception, pursuant to Section 280-45 B (2) of the Southold _ Town Code Within 500 feet of: (X) State or County Road ( ) Waterway (Bay, Sound, or Estuary) ( ) Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State, Federal land. (X) Boundary of Agricultural District ( ) Boundary of any Village or Town If any other information is needed, please do not hesitate to call us. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman ZBA V n By: tE BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson O'of so�ryol 53095 Main Road• P.O. Box 1179 Patricia Acampora Southold,NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. �O� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento �l,YcoUf Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631) 765-1809•Fax (631) 765-9064 December 8,2021 Andrew V. Giambertone, AIA President Andrew V. Giambertone&Associates,Architects 62 Elm Street Huntington,NY 11743 And David N.Altman, Esq. Brown Altman&DiLeo,LLP 538 Broadhollow Road, Suite 301 Melville,NY 11747 Re: ZBA Application#7046SE The Enclaves Hotel, 56655 Main Road, Southold, NY SCTM No. 1000-63-3-15 Dear Sirs; Enclosed please find a copy of the Zoning Board of Appeals determination rendered at their December 2, 2021 meeting, granting a Special Exception Permit to establish a 44 Unit, Two Story Hotel in the Hamlet Business Zoning District upon the above referenced premises in accordance with Article VII, Section 280-35B(4); and Article XI, Section 280-45B(2) of the Town Code. Before commencing any activities, site plan approval and a building permit is necessary. Please submit a copy of the enclosed decision to the Building Department so that they may make the necessary determination. If you have any questions,please feel free to call the office. Since , Kim E. Fuentes Zoning Board Assistant Encl. CC: Building Dept. Planning Dept. --.---- AREA 294,202 50. f DRAWN BY." ✓M DATE' 07108116 CHECKED BY,' /M DRAWNG NO.: Main Rd OR 6175 ACRES 10S NO: Main Rood SH£Er 1 OF 1 __. UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION NO. GATE DESCRIPTION BY TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF ---- –-- SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING THE LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED //�� �� TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY. � 10 GUARANTEES INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY �Q IS PREPARED, AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE ------ TITLE COMPANY, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND ONG S�J,i► LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON, AND 111 "' �a"" .``" TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTI- TUTION. GUARANTEES ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE. Lttf Jy r 0 N0. oo 1 .+ 8 birch 4 birch .0 3 6 cedar t'11v ,,ttP7'r,} 61 \ 8 cedar ` B cedar 8 cedar 1 r,,.t.-''�.,' !•`- 'ry cedar 6 cedes 8 ,.ro., 10 cedar ^"" ✓' twin 12 beech O 8 cedar 11 cam r^ "�' ..,�s'".',-' ' ✓._'r' 10 cedar � ti:, twin 8 birch g cedar 6 cedar .T (�- , �,,..w•,^'•.,p1", .�`k...- l. Min 10 bitch 6 ceda a Jf( B birch �,p 10 cedar 8 cedar 8 cedar ri' �' 6 cedar / �.,. 1 j 8 birth 8 cede /O 0--6 cedar 1 1.-'6 birch ) I 6 tear 6 birch O_ r 10 cedar b 6 d 8 m q' p ' 6 cedar—O 8 cedar 0-- 6 cedar �, ,5 g re � __,�-^ r y 8 cedar 6 cedar1 9 ._8 cedar -108 cedar duster 8 War T 1 6 ccedarf�. 8 cedar 8 birch / 8 cedar _/ O,/ 6 cedar yl,J 6 cedar � ` O--6 cedar � �! twin 8 birch 6 cedar 6 cedar 6 cedar ! � Z 6 cedar 6 cedar 06 birhbP` per- Q „,,. 'j-' ^'•"'� G-- 5 6 cedar 6 cedar 06 cedar 6 birch "o 6 cedar--0 � �-6 cedar �.A� Q �+► \ 10 birth tet\ B birch it cedar 6"do, d �i} V O 10 cedar 06 cedar � 6 cedar G�twin 8 fifth � 11 cedar ' 06 cedar twin 8 birch 6 birch 6 birch .4 8 birch---'� 6 cedar ,0 1`Lr�1;`'r, ! 0 .y.,..--' 8 odor 6 birch 6 coda 8 birch / � / fJG� Q � 8 tech p p- _�•6 c� Q 8 cedar 12 cedar 11 cedar " CI 8 cedar 6 birth \ I Q 6 cedes 6 birch pct 6 birch 08 cedar cluster �-0 6 birch 10 come I i ) 6 odor 8 beech 8 birch O/ d G- /0 8 cedar \ 8 cedar r ,, 6 birch 6 birch 08 birch Nin 6 brch 6 birch---.�Q 6 ceder� 6 birch 6.birch a`~• p` Q 1 Q I0 birth 'l', O 8 cedar "` 6 cedar cluster \ 6«or Q Q / twin 8 birth 6 cedar 6 birch 0-- 4 Q ((( Z W /�`� Cil a alar (+ / Min 10 birch 8 cedar P 6 birch \ \ f 11 1 1 / O f - ? O' triple 8 birch 10 cedar � r(' 10 0000 9 10 mo e YJ. (6 Iotrol b� O 8«dor Cd--8 cedar 6 alar (,1� O-6 cedar `� 1 6 ceded. Q p- 010 cedar / twin 6 birch 6 cedar 010 birth \ (� \ Mm 8 birch ,T � _.„ A:ti i. nae rl.{:•i3 b 1 birch 8 cedes 0---6 cedar I O 8 cedar 10 cedar (win 6 birch ,p b ;cedor 6 cedar 6 cedar 12 birch (0 6 birch 12 birch �•� 6�r �O'- (/ 8 birch 08 birch G�12 cedar 6 cedar 6 ceda p (,Z ,(}�.6 cedar 10 birch 88 coda, 8 cedar""'8 coda.. mar 06 cedor triple 8 birch 10 birch 8 cedar 6 cedor \ "� Og cedar per- � 6 birch 6 cedar 10 cedar cedar �d/, (3 6 birch O 0 6 redar 8 cedar g cedar t 06 birch 6 cedar (� 8 cedar 6 cedar S 59.77 �•�� O B birth r C�8 coda / /d O6 cedar � 8 oder 1 �e 8 cedar 10 cedar-O (}--6 cedes 10 order 6 r OB cedar Q / •j 010 birch 8 cedar 6 cedar � 6 birch 6 ceda 6 birch 8 birch O10 birth ---.y� 6 cedar 8 cedar / O 6 candor 6 cedar 6 hch len 6 birch Q�J 8 testa O� + 08 birch 06 cedar 8 birch 6 cedar O� \ 06 alar P\6 birch 8 tear O6 birth p.-- a 6 testa� C� 6 birch 10 birch'I twin 8 cedar I "�► 06 cedar O6 birch \ C-6 birch p.� 8 cedor q 6 cedar r 014 cedar 6 cedar 8 cedar 6 eaar-•"O 08 cedar "'4 B cedar ` twin 6 birch t 06 birch fi cedar � o-_ 6 birch 6 maple ^� + 8 birch 8 birch B cedar 6 cedar OB color 6 birth 12 birch 6 ad p 6 birch P �' 8 cedar 8 birch � O• G'--8 cedar} 06 birch A,� p�y.�A 6 cedar O,/ �` 6 birth 0---, 6 birch 12 birch 1 �r(ry L•�� � 6maple '�. 16 birch / OMin 8 birch (3 06 cedar 08 birch �j[ two 8 birch 0""8 cedarr ,_ +t G Os cedar O6 birch 012 maple g ceder 8 cedar dm ,-Y 6 cedar O6 birch p 8 cedar 6;e (i' ,\ ! 14 birch 06 birch �R. -8 birth cluster I�6 cedar�, '}} '♦ O6 ceder ST v f 06 cedar OB birch 0 twin 8 beech ;'& 10 birch_�,O 6 War 6 birch "„ \ •,T 6 cedar P 1a birch B c r f( > 4, 6 birch 6 cedar cluster G i<',r•:5r B birth0 6 birch 06 cedar O8 ceda `"b �,•♦'�'' / } 6 cedar 012 birch 08 birch 0 10 cedar 16 birch 8 cedar 010 Bich 6 birch ^6 irch ` f V- Min 8 cedar O,� `♦, ! 8 birch C7 (I O/ Min 6 birch 4`6 holy 14 b;mh + 06 cedar 12 cedar C3.� � `. 06 birch 10 birch r r 12 cedar Q C� 12 firth i -t✓! 010 birch O O twin 6 birch ` q la,- ��-10 birch +�i O6 cedar Orwin 8dreh 1 \� 08 beech 08 cedar 8[ 8 cedar triple 14 birth oder 6 cedar P- --twin 8 birch O 6 birch 10 6 cedar t J r birch 8 birch w 08 birch 0..-8 birch 08 cedar 010 birch ` r'7('I)TV(={],,'• ft 06 cedor B"dot ^IOhirch 1 t ` 10 birch 12 birch � t (3 C-6 birch rch 6 birch 06 cedar O1C birch rC - 06 birch 06 birch �6 oder C�10 cedar Me* al t+ 1)I 12 birch 6 cedar 10 CarterI ` 1 Min 8 birch 1 ' ...,. __ 08 cedar 6 maple p---8 cedar 08 cedar 6 cedar p-- 8 birch Gl ' 16 birch 6 cedar 6 ceder g birch Q 8 cedar Q\ 8 maple / Og tear 08 drrh 6 D'�rch \ \ 8dreh c3 ,0 birth �'�6 cedar 8 cedar r? 12 birch O 8 cedar 6 birch 10 birch twin 8 cedar 12 brch 12 Doth t 8 cedar q C'� 10 Nreh 0--twin 6 birch 010 brcb O 8 cedar ;4k'u1ti1t EL ARIA �`' � \ "� \ 1 0 10 cedar O Min 8 birch 12 Dine 18 pine 8 cedar 8 cedar 8 maple Q j o--'--6 maple 06 birch 6 beech g cedor 'i 12 birth 08 cedar O6 birch 6 cedar 8 cedar 10 ceda 8 firth � triple 6 cedor � - 6 06 maple 06 locust +� f0 birth G-1 twin 12 birch Q ,p 0�0'� G 8 cedar, 6 cedar ,� Q •�� Q •rvo-_8 birch 08 ceda, / Otwin 6 birch 1D cedar y 1f++ 12 dead tree i cedar 8«dor 6 cedar ` Q Q Min 6 birch 8 ma \ P �"'-12 birch 06 birch 06 birch OMin 8 birch 6 cedar (3" 01 b p� t ori?'t` GL 06 Pine 6 birch 6 cedar 8 cedar 6�r 6 cedar 6 cedar di-k ` \ 010 birch p /d' twin B birth D,i 10 birch 6 cedar twin 10 birch `j? m (� 06 cedar twin 6 birch / 10 birch / / Q 6 birch (7 d' 8 mopk {¢+y 1 06 birch Q fi cedar 10 b4dh 10 mapleed / J/ 6 oda 6 code, 10 cedar Qf p`8 birch y OB birch 08 birch 10 birch �¢ G7 � 6 map] (A� triple 8 birch 08 birch ///--- �6 cedar 0. Q._--6 cedar ,,,,/' 6 cedar 6 birch p- 6 cedar O6 birch OB birch (3'_'8 cedar 6 cedar\`- g cedar 6 coder 6�m 6 birch B maple et" y- O 1 • 10 cedar O 6 ceda g 6 cedar g[oda 6 droh p�6 cedar 6� 8 cedar "1y r Iwin 10 birch 06 birch 6-10 oda / (3-- OO ,odor ,gam 6 cedar 6 cedor 08 r '^ pp.--6 car 6 birch 16 bird' (.-6 birch 6 cedar / 8 cedar 8 cedar j 6 cedar ) 6 firth � Cly 012 b'vch 6 cedar /� �6 cedar �, T(?- 6 birch q Q� 16 bird 6 moo' �10 birch 6 birch 6 birch OMin 6 birch -r twin 6 birch 8 cedar ('/p 8 cedar "� 6 birch 8dreh Irl _ 6 cedar \z d 6 birch 06 birch OB oda 'F' :S 6 cedar y � � 6 birch 06 cedar � �� 6 ceda �""6 cedar 8 cedar O 6 birch 0�Mi,6 birth O 10 cedar O� ! �. 06 birch g cedar p 6 birch �_10 cedar �j 6 cedar 06 cedar 12 birch 06 cedar - \ 6 birch Wad 8 beech G- 10 birch 1� p O-- cedar 6 birth / i y0 •(�16 birch 012 birch G 6 birch �`h r 6--6 birchroh a,_-10 cedar O8 0--8 birch � 6 cedar p._8 cedar G., 07 6 odor r 12 maple ��6 cedar 6 cedar e,--10 birth G-8 cedar 6 cedar tw'm 6 odor N 6 birch Q r triple 6 birch 6 birch � a"?, P� d` G` 6 cedar 6 birch 0}---6 alar 01 . 6 birch i "}'� ,,.. �O G>\ ((� 8 cedar G� 0. 10 droh 6 birch ' 6 birth twin 6 birch 8 cedar 8 cedar B cedar 10 birch 0` P-B birch f o 6 calor 12 birch � 10 birch 06 coder 6 odor ' Q 8 cam a3-�_ P �6 birch ;-,11 Mn 6 birch 8 cedar (� hrin 6 cedar G� 6 cedar \ �6 birch OB cedar.�:_��; � I� 6 birch OO O\ 6 cedar p O 12 cedar 6 cedar \ 6 cedar 6 birch 6 ceder N 8 ceda �- B cedar i O 11'x'1 O 1 6 cedar - •4 ceda ii birch f (`-12 birch 6 odor (3--10 ode, + 10 with 8 cedar • a�-6 cedar ,M1 w X1'1 O 8 birch 8 birch�4 6 cedar-O 8 cedar 6 cedar 1 Q (}-^ 10 birch 0}1 / 6 / 6 odordodorcedar 6 birch _„{ 6 cedar 6 cedar \ 6 cedar C}.--8 cedar O8 cedar Cf p.-6 cedar 6 cedar \ 8 birch A O 6 cedar \ ,.,, 8 cedar D 6 birch ti cedar / 6 ma e 6 cedar 6 cedar J 8 odor 6 birch � �/6 cedar 12 birch (}- ) \ 8 Ledo' 6 birch a M1••- F7 6 War ,� 6 both � 10 cedar � d� O--8 birth r. 4 ''�:,� �,--•..--�,ti � 6 cedar �_ 12 birh 8 ceder 010 birch 12 birch\Q (� 6 birch� 6 brch 6 birch C)" 6 maple 6 cedar,z terka 8 birch p` 10 birch 6 cedar 0 ' 10 birch 8 cedar B 6 cedar 8 odor 6 birch 6 with 08 birch 6 cedar 6 cede 6 maple 06 maple �'�12 10 oder birth 10 birch 6 ceda 6 birch 0 fripk 6 maple Q -„�� 6 birch 06 cedar 5 cedar ,win 6 maple�� 0 + 8 cedar S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-03— z 06 cedar �-8 birth 6 tear 10 cedar 6 birch C� 6 maple 0'--6 ceda 6 maple/ 1 1.. - � -8 brch 6 birch g cedar 6 mak B cedar 8 birch e C3--6 birch 8 birch Cj' OB birch 10 Irch P �_twin 8 maple 8 birch (3^--10 birch y v 6 birch Q 6 birch Orwin 6 brch 0' 6 mople 8 birch 8 locust 6 teder 06 birch <birch coda 0'' I 1 10 birch / 6 cedar /0 ��• 6 cedar 6 adar� 8 birth 6 bhch G�0 8 cedar B cedar O 6 cedar 8 more 1 O 6«dor 8 birch 6 birth twat 6 bitch g cedar P 8 birch ^� Q ' 26 birch �� O 6 birch 6 brch 6 birch 8 ma �-- C ~` �� �` Q _-, �O 8 cedar ?,- twin 8 birch '� maple � 6 maple d/ �. �y 6 cedar '�-�,,� 5 6 birch \ 6 birch 01'• 6 tear y( '�tr-� �t r 8 birch D 10p birth �� < 6 cedar 6 6'rcch 8 cedar ♦ B maple 8drch �'Y 17vlr- 'ry"L'�A -.�firth 6 locust �` �- 12 birch r_r-.^..�`- .... Q 6 cedar Com' O P- 6 birch 8 mo ...,., „ 20 birch 6 birch 6 birch or-�6 birch -.E1 I � „_,i-!8 - N 6 cedar O� 6 birch p 6 birch p\ 10 dead 16 birch 1 �j (�-6 cedar 6 birch �­ 6 cedar B cedar 6 mopk „-,.12 birch B cedar I iV C O C� 6 birch / q 6 cedar '� 6 y� C�-'6 birch 8 cedar -_.;'� �/ 6 locust `- 6oda 8 cedor \ Min 6 birch i 8 maple 6 cedar 6 birth p_ 6 cedar 8 obi i� P—12 birch \ ! _ 6 bircl r G'�-6 birch 6 birch 6 cedar B cedar \ Q 6 cedar 8 cedar +�6 birch 6 cedar p ---- 6 cedar l f13� 8 birch twin 14 maple �O �6 cedar 6 birch / ) 10 locus) t .. ,f P Min 8 birch 6 locust ..,� I6 ma6 birch ` 16 ma e 8 cedar 6 birch { tr le 10 apple tree D]t1f 6 birch6 cedar 6 brch �- 'P PP 6 booth /C� ,Nin 10 mopk 6 birch Q 16 karst `' CIA 1_ 28 maple / 18 maple 0. d \ IB maple t rn'r't_A �4�, Min 8 birch 16 mopk 08 cedar ;, '`+ •� i„� le cluster 6 birch 14 maple 6 cedar 8 maple E J 6 ccedar ".I p 6 birch d _-{ } \'♦18 oak 6 maple CCLG�. O 12 cedar �8 moo, Q 6 birch 1 1� _ o r 10 cedar,:. \ 8 maple 0--t6 birch ? 1, `• t',::'?7.� n,-i^,';', 10 beech 8 mopk G,.-8 cedar 8 center 06 oak 1, ��! i;' :i;'{:J ' 14 oak 1 twin 6 Sycamore 10 oak r quad 14 oak 0. 8 cedar C�-8 cedar � O - 14 oak"A ,�-.- 6 birch 6 oak •t 10 birch-� O�6 maple 8 locusl 8 oak 6 mopk 4 1 ^" 1 12 oak i ,0 0-6 maple 11 oak 8 birch •1 ' .=,1 a' 6 maple 10 oak 0.. 6 brch 10 ma D] IO mopk l 10 oak p---10 maple V 8 oak �6 maple 0 quad 14 ook C� 10 oak 24 oak � Q ' \ Q -t Q` 10 oak � t0 ♦f 'r 6 maple Min 10 oak O i r A O p Min 18 oak 6 latest ? T ♦�*,, w I`a 10 made 12 map] 8 maple \ / 1�'{1�j� AP A / 8 brch: 8 maple / 74 oak � F / 112 locust d 6 maple 6 oak 8 beech 10 oak QQQ �• .. y � 10 maple (:).-- 1 twin 10 karst ••ma�yy 0 p'14 ook C� 6 wed ( � ♦ Iy "" &-8 maple IB dead 3' 12 birch uad 24 oak / 6 beech d•v', !. "' Ig maliks i f q 10 spruce C! 0 k 14 oak 1.)8 birch f \ 16 dead 6 sycamore Cir 26 oak lees 0� !r 10 oak O lain 10 decd \ \ 6 maple 8 maple ., c (a twin 6 maple q �[ o (9 / b --i-. -. ! 14 cedar 36 oak > 11 10 maple � 8 oak 8 ole 6 maple /s O ,. ,. ,,,-.- _ 18 ..? r� ..mopk Bbeedh C,,l t 24 oak ,, 14 oak triple t� ._-�:... .,.,. _ ,..r ..,r•^.._.!--� .yi„ X28.$ d _ oak /. 11 .". ,^ k-- .... ,.'.^:" 14 ruce 20 beech cluster i �•/ 6 ark 12 birch .. i / ( 8 oak ..-....... t! .;r'•,r a'. ,^rr I C,) ? - .,. I " f0 evergreen 1 \jry ... 16 cedar � N 6 oak 14 maple 0 26 maple " f I V 16 moble 14 spruce (xi 12 birth\ ._�, Z :�t,'.t' ' S�� _ --O Q_om-0(}�\♦' '•a1,� ;_ 1t. };10 spruce �03.0O O B oak 12 beech ; 6 birch90.1010 beech5°�4140 W - Min 6 beach t}ri { l d _ r 'II, twin 18 birch 1 G` \ 8 birch .t O p� 14 beach 12 cedar j r 14 beech S.C.T.M. N0. t 17^1 14 cedar 26 dead }' f000-63-0346 ...._.. -,.._._ N birch ff r `\♦ ' i t -,r ----f F "�6£'.v:.1k C O ;o- 8 maple 24(nwpk < 8 mopk70 O' -t •. _, ._ =- r -"t 51 � " #' 14 bre... ne 020 maple .st r p ��. ^�^ '-- ...•.._ 17.7 In" c G_-6 mopk . ,. ,. . r.. .. 6 karat S.C.T.M. N0. S.C.T.M. N0. 1000-63-0342 1000-63-0343 'r'+ 6 birch bin 6 dogwood_4 't t'?5t 49.6' ; y O 831.0 „ „ ; i O ..... S.C.T.M. N0. - — — _ — 1000-63-03-14 INS_ 1, , 22.3 22.7 ; I �i, utility Pole�.�..��� hydrant LINE TRAFFIC Catch - _--- __ UBLE 111 - • ---"---'--' - �° TRAFFIC LINE basin (EL 01 ole DO LOW utility p catch (� asphalt curb bosh WHITE TRAFFIC LINE INEsnO�/�/ �r /y catch- UND ANF asphalt WHITE TRAFFIC LINE ✓J + - bosin pavement DOUBLE YELLOW TRAFFIC LINES EAST[MOUND LANE 1 WHITE TRAFFIC LINE utility SIGN R.ECEJVFr- CURBING pole .Z end of white lines basin uti' y catch CONCRETE SIGN botch �s basin Z � ,.,F`t'r �/ \ curb 11.1 !' 1,. () Fs 1 i j utility \` torch basin poly-_ drop SIGN \i pole �? n drop curbs < wal� 991.30 Q ' ROA 584°04'50"W �, ZONINGBOAR[)OF11PFEAi� CtT— D MAIN NYS R- 25 TREE I SURVL;"IrY OF PROPERN - SI TUA TED IN SOUTHOLD LAND SURVEYING ; TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. SUBDIVISIONS f , � '� S.C.T.M. NO. 1000-63-0345 TITLE & MORTGAGE SURVEYS ,/ 1 40/� TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS j LAND PLANNERS SCALE f — ' JAN. 30, 20/7 SITE PLANS N 0 GRAPHIC SCALE �F 4 0 86rO 40 0 20 40 80 160 JOHN MINTO, L.S. PHONE: (631) 724-4832 LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NEW YORK STATE LIC. NO. 49866 FAX: (631) 724-54553 93 SMITHTOWN BOULEVARD SMITHTOWN NY 11787 ( IN FEET ) I inch = 40 ft. a � kECEIVE[ APR 18 2017 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - 1 MAII A ¢... -_ - ._ _- SEE SEC.NO.055 LINE - ---- B MATCH _ LINE w N 333792 T3 254 ss 8.3A(c) .: y 21 � + :3 3 1.1 115A(0) 10.8A(c) `T 3 clp N N fn 18.1 $ 16 2 +,P t 57A(c) 'L o 9L Y •� 28.1 ,8A +9. ' c 2-SA(c) _ 17.2 fa 1 9 26 ( ',6 1.tA(c) .Ee �•2 5.9A(c) ai 4 1.9A(c) 1-6A( � ,o �• 5.5 * ,fa '� o ,4 a ,°` • � •o ^�— l0 f 0 P t o � /'� lb rs IN i g � 1 �]^� 66(c,55 M401 I b3 1 3--39 - TONT/OF I� a- 3-- 3 JL" 3s 2.7A(c) ,m 30., s -• ... �) 3 s m I +1;1 v1 O aI° 31.1 � y� '..�� ••� ' � (OPEN Y6/J ,920 / ,ti u 13 1.OA(c) a 23 Im a 11 - -2s FOR`�s` d'� FOR PCL.NO. ?2 F @ SEE SEC.NO. 24 R 3� * 1 070-06-034 RI 7__ N329 / au ne m 8 RD.° ! eO `i'9 r MATCH Z ———— LINE 3 JyEST HILL RD. e J K TOMMOF SECTION NO NOTICE C � COUNTY OF SUFFOLK C 063 SOUTHOLD E ass MNNTENANCE,ALTEMTION,SALE OR �3 Real Property Tax Service Agency r 01STRIBUTION OF ANY PORTION OF THE b VILLAGE OF �� SUFFOX COUNTY T--IS PRONIBITEO F County Center Riverhead,N Y 11901 061 064 -Our N�ITTEN PERMISSION OF THE ��� SCALE IN FEET. A 067 p� P O]O 133 DISTRICT NO 1006 PROPERTY MAP