Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Bertault - 95 Navy St (2)
`J`�g pur Unique y�� Edward Webb,Chairperson � Town Hall Annex Anne Surchin,Vice Char ; SOLlTHOLD 54375 Route 25 Robert Harper PO Box 1179 Joseh McCarthyp � { o Southold,NY 11971 = f,. z Mariella Ostroski �o , ��� \�� Fax(631)765-9502 Tracey Dwyer,Administrative Assistant �'c AGo�� Telephone: (631)765-1802 RFSFRVA ri www.southoldtownny.gov Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commission January 4,2021 RESOLUTION #10.22.20.2 Certificate of Appropriateness RE: 95 Navy Street,Orient,NY SCTM#1000-26.-1-12.2 Owner: Vincent Bertault RESOLUTION: WHEREAS, 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY is on the Town of Southold Registry of Historic Landmarks, and building lies within the designated Orient Historic District according to the National Register of Historic Places and the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 170-8 of the Town Code(Landmarks Preservation Code) of the Town of Southold, all proposals for material change/alteration must be reviewed and granted a Certificate of Appropriateness by the Southold Town Historic Preservation Commission prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, and, WHEREAS, the applicants representative Gary R. O'Connor submitted a proposal to construct a rear addition to the structure, replace the windows, doors siding and roof on the entire structure, the reconfiguration of the front entry, conversion of an existing shed to a cabana and installation of a covered porch, and, WHEREAS, a pre submission hearing was held on August 18, 2020, where the applicants representative submitted drawings of the scope of work and outlined the project for the commission, and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on October 22,2020,where the applicants representative submitted the final proposal of the project for the commission, and, WHEREAS, the property is currently in use as single family home and under the proposed plan that single family use remains. Therefore, the analysis of whether the proposed alteration is consistent with principles of adaptive reuse, whereby the principal historic features of the landmark are maintained while permitting the use of the landmark for new uses other than its original use is not applicable to this proposal. WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission considered similarity in design, architecture and appearance of the proposed alteration with the historic design, architecture and appearance of both the original structure and those in the surrounding historic district and determines as follows: 1. The proposed alteration will significantly change the appearance of the Navy Street facade since the front door and steps leading to the porch will be centered under the large dormer, The proposed 1-story addition facing to the rear of the Structure, composed of a summer/dining room (15'-8" long x 14' deep)rising 19' in height from the first floor elevation to the ridge, is in fact equivalent to a two-story house. Also proposed is a rectangular cupola adding another 3'-11" to the overall height of the structure. Part of the wing facing Willow Street also includes a new bedroom, 20' long stepped back 12" from the summer/dining room, running parallel to Navy Street. 2. The addition is not subservient to the principal building. While its ridge is 15" lower than the original house the new cupola of the addition is actually higher than the house ridge. The massing of the rear dwarfs the scale of neighboring houses. The three wings together don't relate to one another or the neighbors and the inchoate and conflicted forms of the proposed alteration and addition just aren't compatible with the general historic character of the National Register Historic District. WHEREAS, the proposed construction is not necessary for compliance with the applicable building codes or other federal or state regulations, and, WHEREAS,the proposed construction is not necessary to allow for a use of the property permitted by the Town Code in the applicable zoning district; WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to preserve the historic features of the landmark and its relation to the historic character of the community and Town as the subject property although altered over the years to be relevant for its time, still represents a fine example of the rural regional vernacular style typical of Orient cottages in the 19th century. This cottage, with it existing front door offset from an axial stepped entrance, includes two dormers, one small and one large, puncturing the roofline but extending straight up in the same plane as the front wall, and along with an amalgam of small additions at the rear constitute the major features of this structure, all of which are visible from Navy Street, and, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the Southold Town Historic Preservation Commission determines that the proposed work detailed in the above referenced application fails to meet the criteria for approval under Section 170-8 (A)of the Southold Town Code and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the Commission denies the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, Pursuant to §170-7(C)(3) the Historic Preservation Commission makes the following recommendations: 1. The linear link between the structures on Navy and Willow streets shows first floor fenestration east elevation composed of three casement windows sitting under a dormer, which is the same width as the window ensemble below. This elongated dormer with three awning windows awkwardly mimics the roof pitch of the side gable of the house on the east side of the cottage. If it had punctured the wall plane like the dormers on the front of the house or been designed as a shed dormer, the result would be more historically accurate. 2. If the scale of the addition were reduced and made sympathetic to the original existing house then the project might be viable. 3. Retain the off-center entry as such a design element is typical for Shingle era houses built during the 1880s-90s, MOVER: Commissioner Harper SECONDER: Commissioner Surchin OPPOSED: Chairman Webb, Commissioner Surchin, Commissioner Harper, Commissioner McCarthy, and Commissioner Ostroski. AYES: 0 r ABSTAINED: Commissioner Santana RESULT: Denied Signed: i1MA Tracey L.Dwyer,Application Coordinator for the Historic Preservation Commission Date: January 5,2021 HISTORIC IMAGES PERINCHEF COTTAGE 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT NY Mm OR, mmo, Ma ! E`I'inoiwj, R IFAT. I.- I a: ' � �'• rya�� �'� � aak� fi $ �' j° � •+�F $s/ mac•"' _.�d •@J n'••.; nzy�" '�.^R :,,,rod- .Tr r _ 5." � : ; c e — * < P:. te' Abk 9„ . . < n a x F' x y R � ^M m w£ E r r. y� ' a = ,, i .r ;..:.,:«_...- ,.. �,as ;.:ate- .,G.y wrY 'ds ±•.. ., .x- � ... .,..,.- -. ,}� .* �:,j:. ��,..��-- -.� .. ....:.. =.:.. ,.y-. "�', �.* d�" a w. .'��'fit m@•r -,.....�,,,..,.w,� �u<v .....-. ...<:�. '" .a�+"-ego-'�5..<a' ....:: .:.,`�,, a @ �,^.tas;. .• :- �;. . ,,.:.. '"�:." <.=a'. - - .,.: �„'^"` .,r .,. .,:. ... ,�.', ,.. .<:. ;,•..: .,.::..- „a i •.�� .{� ":mss o. - a < - WILLOW STREET GARY R. O'CONNOR EL.4.2' N85°28'30"E 65.93' EL 5 2' ARCHITECT,AIA ' -----------,`'_, -------- - -------- -------- 1 8 CORN ELL STREET NY LIC 020554 ! EXISTING WILLOW LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 TREETRUNK7rrt 1 4� N PHONE 609 397 3635 a �__� =ti ;_ Y _ ZONING COMPUTATIONS ZONING DISTRICT R-40 REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED I 1-w-1 4'-0'HIGH WD ' O _=T i i=- r sL"z_-=__- -,i ' LOT REQUIREMENTS. VERTICAL SLAT FENCE Ir=_s; s =_3 .7=r=_=x F=z __' MIN LOT SIZE 40,000 S F 19,905 S F NO CHANGE _'==�=_c= MIN LOT WIDTH 150 FT 104 FT NO CHANGE Tr � MIN LOTDEPTH 175 FT 207 FT NO CHANGE N PRINCIPAL BUILDING MINIMUM YARD/HT REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED T FRONT YARD 50' 108' NO CHANGE SIDE YARD 15' 166'&55' 166'&4064' �>t EXISTING 1 1/2 STY. REAR YARD SD' 1065' 90' O ��"* -__ OIs FRAME BARN j _ _ _ MAX HEIGHT 35FT 21' NO CHANGE c R i EXISTING FLR EL=B' 2112 STY, 2STY NO CHANGE C 4'-0'HIGH WD C I VERTICAL SLAT FENCE i GATE LARGEST FLOOR AREA(INCLUDING COVERED PORCH, 2001 SF s i EL-4.9' (v890 - NEW BUILDINGAREA 613 S F 4'-0"HIGH HEDGEROW W! ; ---_. _ ,Y 56'00"E FLOOD HAZARD ZONE AE-ELEVATION-6' HIDDEN WIRE FENCING ;, AWN --—-_ __— 54 53' EXISTING FLOOR ELEVATION 6 5' PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION 8' .6.6'— ,_j���" 'a°��"a° ��� ,��;,•'-•� '�' _ _k��% � - ��� '�'�t.�,,- � (ELEVATION 80' COVERAGE. EXISTING PROPOSED _ -\�' ,, z EXISTING DWELLING 950 S F s � �- �, EXISTING COVERED PORCH 210 S F (n ��„ `�` 5' EXISTING SHED 184 S.F PROPOSED LOW o � '�`: y• ,, EXISTING BARN 930 S F _ -+ "'-.='-'-;:”` ';��� 3- -� PROPOSED NEW ADDITION 613SF PROFILE CHAMBER -+.- I I T'>"- r ;_'� -;%y V� ( � :'�,",„� �w h'�'�` PROPOSED COVERED PORCH 2285E LEACHING SYSTEM A "7 DN I I I N) PROPOSED POOL 220 S F p DN PROPOSED i I I m PROPOSED SHED ADDITION 96 S F [WASTEWATER t ' TREATMENTSYSTEM I I TOTAL DWELLUNG 950SF 6138F 1.5635 F. OEX 22• ROUND POOL 0I I I I TOTAL BUILDING AREAS 2,274 B F 1,157 S P 3131 S F. eos- 0 EXISTING BARN ELEVATION W/PROPOSED FENCE SCALE.114'=1'-0' PROPOSED T _ ! MAX LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED EXISTING PROPOSED ' e' 1134' SEPTIC TANK - i '1 SHED -r'�- 14DRIZONTAL I I F7iENLARGEMENTTO HOUSEPOWDEW F✓`., d_- _ z o� EXISTING ' ,r.�..� . -.rte,",-,�,.„-° T; -_. _ ( SHE ROOM&WET BAR I~ f 'K"""V" �^„--:' �.'_''rj'3 �I NEW CA6ANA I I PROPOSED LOW O ' ( I - PROFILE CHAMBER ' 4'-T HIGHHEDGE OW W7 � t - ' R I I LEACHING SYSTEM ' HIDDEN WIRE FENCING G RAIN ATE�{"" GARDEN i POND DOWN FR.GAR I Z 356T_ 40 64' 0___ _ _ -- EDAR WD VERTICAL SLAT FENCE.CWEATHER NATURALLY- UP LL- cn " PR P D 1 EADDITION =.- PROPOSED FLR EL D"G I rn 1JJ�/ I a PROPOSED LOCATION i9EXIU STING 1 I i OF CONDENSING UNITS-+' FASTENED TO WALL -' . 1 EXISTING Q 0 ' nl MECHANICAL/ ' iMUD ROOM D I c EXISTING KITCHENI - I NO DATE BY DESCRIPTION FI ,k�s? xt yn.,,; I REVISIONS 'Z" HIT HHHHHHHHUH fflstw ���;s+reyeic•`,•�"r�;i"`._�_,.,7,g OT iANRNmn NsmolN, ar o R mucra )OCUMOTSS167TOVERRALLOmoNSANDC EORECOTHEw WENCNG ACTNESERRORS, �SSORAYOTR"'R51GES TOxEwerDISCOVERED SNUL 9e¢AEYRBVRTEOUP Ir EXISTGFRAME HOUSE PR FLR EL=B') PRINCIPLE DWELLING ADDITION&ALTERATIONS tl& 16 6' ' VINCENT BERTAULT 95 NAVY STREET.ORIENT,NEWYORK 11957 s �aPROPOSED j - I COVERED PORCH GRAw nr E PROPOSED FULL SITE I 86, E L.4.6': UP DATE 0915.20 DRAWING NO UP 778' JOB NO 1950.9' ' S82°49'40"W 17.86' EL 5DRAWN D5 SCALE AS SHOWN A_2 NAVY STREET 85.71' ------- ( PROPOSED FULL SITE PLAN SCALE 1'=10'0' FENCE ELEVATION DETAIL SCALE 1'=1'-0' gRYEV EY/E0 GRO'0 GARY R. O'CONNOR 717""1 ARCHITECT,AIA g "'M 8 CORYELL STREET NY LIC 020554 LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 PHONE 609 397 3635 mIm an IIS �" R, MM VIEW OF HOUSES ALONG NAVY STREET -2, Ag A ,kkq zft, o At, N� 1, is eq, oA al", f 0 . ... ...... Ell 3 i P111-f" 71-17"7-1 0 ZD ADJACENT NEIGHBOR TO EAST W/ADDITIONS HOUSE ON VINCENT&FLETCHER WITH WRAP AROUND PORCH HOUSE ON SKIPPER LANE W/ADDITION LARGER THAN PRINCIPLE BUILDING U) Z: O 77-71TIM71a.1117�-Fal & �4 7"t —n �lv q., S LL- 'g" 2 *1 0 '2e" A- S s11 'n "IK —I 5wze' " v—, "j, NO DATE BY DESCRIPTION REVISIONS B COIQ24CMACTMTES ERRORS, Ov9ss`ONsORANYOR`EPNcO sm`cEs Di�SRMILMILWATELYBEREPORTEI) CTW% P PRINCIPLE DWELLING ADDITION&ALTERATIONS VINCENT BERTAULT 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT,NEW YORK 11957 EXAMPLES OF ORIENT HOUSES DATE 0915.20 DRAWING NO JOB NO 1950 DRAWNA-3 DS SCALE AS SHOWN BY HOUSE WITH CUPOLA&3 SIDED PORCH HOUSE WITH CUPOLA ON ORCHARD STREET FACING NAVY HOUSE WITH CUPOLA ON FLETCHER STREET MfIEWED By 'ROC GARY R. O'CONNOR 4 4 ARCHITECT,AIA C 4 k t-, 8 CORYELL STREET NY LIC 020554 LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 PHONE 6093973635 +-�—w 5 ' EXISTING EXISTING UTILITY ROOM MECHANICAL 5 l MUD ROOM r I ❑ N o-> EXISTING KITCHEN I < ON EXISTING BASEMENTACCESS ! I � 3 3 UP I I EXISTING OFFICE 2 DN `I-------- 2 ep DN. EXISTING BATHROOM Q / j EXISTING DEN EXISTING LIVING ROOM EXISTING MASTER BEDROOM EXISTING BEDROOM ------ ---,- r-- I I I Z o U EXISTING COVERED PORCH N� I..L (n i Z O ' U �h"W,.diP O �- O Z EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE 114•=1'-0' EXISTING SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 174•=I'-o• d � 717 __ _7"__ „8•` '•: '`�s fe :4�' n� s{,. �'' :'b aNO DATE BY I DESCRIPTION REVISIONS ,. rt Is Tiff RESPDxsisum oP TWE CONTRACTOR x ;�is.=: .'Y•-'�a�, ..`C�: S. an"'' -- �:- g •�, rr�vnrxn�caumucmxoocuemms —c'..--e5,- �£.=_''_ �'– :_�. '> - :.,. i'`z zF '<'E .��u, mas """""a..<_• ', ,,�` :e-; 5$;,.m�.. ;:' "',q.., V 860RE Wl0RMANiGACTNITES,ERRORS. ^ oua�cw SSww.)MEMJUvBEREMRIM .� . • - POEGT4IE PRINCIPLE DWELLING ADDITION&ALTERATIONS VINCENT EERTAULT 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT,NEWYORK 11957 ONEXISTING DWELLING PLANS �- DATE C91S20 DRAWING NO i 10S N0 1950 DRAWN DS SCALE ASSHOWN A BY !)SOUTH VIEW(NAVY STREET) 2)EAST VIEW(FACING SOUTH-WEST) ( EAST VIEW(FACING NORTH-WEST) ®WEST VIEW(FACING SOUTH-EAST) )5 WEST VIEW(FACING SOUTH) AY FEMEWED GROL GARY R. O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA n 8 CORYELL STREET NY LIC 020554 LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 PHONE 6093973635 �r� w 4'4' 35'-8' WALL LEGEND 20'-0' ' 75''8° —� EXISTING WALLTO REMAIN v_ ----- - — — --- NEW WALL °N 12'-0°X6'-0"DOOR M a ZONING COMPUTATIONS _ I a4�,- ° ,,"n°' ZONING DISTRICT R 40 NEW SUMMER ROOM +'"a '"� ' ^ �I 1 r �_^ ti:.{�k„", � REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED i I �'1 .�« P.`�;'% ' ' LOT REQUIREMENTS O@a- �, ' MIN LOTSIZE 40,0005 F 19,905 S F NO CHANGE o �� I - „'., a^s 5°°,}a. g,'.c.�^•�,s -*` ys ye, u'Y MIN LOTWIDTH 150 FT 104 FT NO CHANGE I ,yge _ I q' ,. a �a ° MIN LOT DEPTH 175 FT 207 FT NO CHANGE NEW BEDROOM u+,;,", N - -....- ^,,.- .? 3;Lt' . `^" � I � 1 YZ: �1i �,§°x.�ra'".'?4°•°„„,-”S,w°'`"+"`I"a -,�='s'' *= \$rt�, k'4M >,"' _,f..,. #' PRINCIPAL BUILDING MINIMUM YROIHT REOUIREMENIS-�k % GARY R. O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA i EXISTING NEW E-------N-------- 8 CORYELL STREET NY LIC 020554 613SF ` ® ' LAMBERTVILLE NJ 06530 ® PHONE 609 397 3635 " ® TOP OF CUPOLA 124'-3' v - -------------------------------I--------�,`--------------------� SPECIFICATION OUTLINE TOP OF EXISTING RIDGE HEIGHT 121'-7" _ >< ® �` } ROOF --------------'--------- CEDAR SHINGLES,WEATHER NATURALLY (MEAN HEIGHT OF EXISTING RIDGE 122'-4") �:�" -' -. -�" ,tet, SIDING �,� }'T- ` TOP OF NEW RIDGE 120'-4" _—_—_— -'� ,ram f ' CEDAR SHINGLES,WEATHER NATURALLY ` - 6 F_ �T_Eln'�,Cms . EXPOSED FOUNDATION' REPLACE K-STYLE GUTTERS SMOOTH STUCCO NEUTRAL EARTH TONE COLOR T B D ^<�%" , .I' ., ,,� COPPER HALF ROUND GUTTERS Y r EXISTING HEIGHT OF TOP PLATE FROM SECOND FLOOR 4'-5—_—_ I '3��, -�'�,',° -- 'r,^ _ _ _- _ r _ -s, i TI f WINDOWS �' IL CUSTOM WOOD WINDOWS TO MATCH EXISTING S D L -H k"yi MUNTIN BARS WI SPACER BAR "' yg/�,�/..a `�'•"�-- rY"'�y NEW COPPER HALF WALKWAYS ns x° ,:T' xs� , , `, : y"\ cSi1 ROUNDGUTTERS BLUE STONE OR SIMILAR NATURAL STONE " !Rwal jjI_5 FIRST FLOOR 101'-11" (6'FLOOD COMPLIANTELEVATION) TERRACE GRADE 101.4"-- NE_W GRADE 100'-11" W -- } 0 - NEW GRADE 100'-11" EM fA t00YEARFLOOD �' - _—`-------- u_h� „t• f°:% _ ��a.awi,� <»se`s%=' __ �yir .. "/� ;.�`t„ 'a >,',r's,-��.,..� , „ r ..r�..�x`,.�� _NAW STREET 100'-0"_ _ _ —'— k 6`ELEVATION "«n< �c°• <� �y a �^x F ,�. �/,,, Vis, > .:/a •e9 ,�i '.;�, 'i, 2', 4r ,� � min ff' i' I i 0 EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/4'_1.0- z O U U) TOP OF NEW RIDGE 120'4' O Ll. TOP OFNEW BEDROOM RIDGE tt3'-7" AE ^ = n— O ~�-�'� �-TAT-�'�-"-r_-�*�r`� � 7:��t ^ s-!'`;.,•." } _ > ."• . Y - '-_ j I ____ -:- I. 4t M NO GATE 9Y DESCRIPTION •. . . i - i 3--II�_ ;-'j- _......jkkk "- ", REVISIONS , 6F'IRE�Si�1T"�'A•TO'•.�OR 'r"v".�+y,5�'��"�,.✓,,`°a�'✓,��°'S�§�...a...rr�....�.<.\`�>-,=af",M�y%nr'>,an�C""ne�y,�'_��°���„�^�"�;,.,°.°""it.�•��f>-��........,�✓i'i`R°.5,!^.,""'�/fi/'lr✓�s;,��.2-�,�$;-��' .. .::."-..„m✓ifv/,”,".�ws¢�;a"�;�s,,"S,,"�\;w'�,�.>,o�,�",..,���,�.t'<a..T.,�`v.,°�ka,�"t,°�''���y'��'',Y;„y✓,�.'—°F f_J._>��e_.,:�,3—.:.3'cn°°_"a_"s^°_:_�yn�,�"," _—_—.,_—,> _—_`��—<','�_'<-—�z%.-'_i�-r<.'x'--��-ry2',1_. . _„ t-T°--a-r--^a.�.Mw,.&�: _�,.,.,T.�;_sa�:.-.z_�'.?;�;<re^-_txs"�^ �T'a�e�<,�-,��y? GARY R. O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA NEW EXISTING e. 613 S F -� . 8 CORYELL STREET NY LIC 020554 LAMBERTVILLE,NJ 08530 TOP OF CUPOLA 124'-3' , PHONE 609 3913635 _—_—_—_—___—_—_—_—_—___—_—_—_—_—_ _—_—___—_'__—_—_—___—_—_____—_______—_—_—__ tam;-1 SPECIFICATION OUTLINE _TOP OF EXISTING RIDGE HEIGHT 121_'-7' ROOF TOP OF NEW RIDGE 120'A' �. , ;n t< "[ (MEAN HEIGHT OF EXISTING RIDGE 122d� CEDAR SHINGLES,WEATHER NATURALLY __—_—___—_—_—_—_—___—_—___—___— -. e'> # ''px<-7 SIDING CEDAR SHINGLES,WEATHER NATURALLY EXPOSED FOUNDATION SMOOTH STUCCO NEUTRAL EARTH TONE COLOR TBD WINDOWS CUSTOM WOOD WINDOWS TO MATCH EXISTING S D L -A MUNTIN BARS W!SPACER BAR WALKWAYS I -- -,, BLUESTONEORSIMILARNATURALSTONE IL L _ > " FIRST FLOOR 101'-11• •TERRACE 101'-0'-.—.—. —. a'>a> '�-'-*A>.,'.s 'a a.,'j$�t"�i<.'. �8=LOO=CO=PLANT ELEVATION)—. �-------------- .t -N -V ,,.a<;,;sd^ON-1 ,� �Y,- NAW STREET GRADE 100'-0• a' .`',7"'�-`ga "a A� < -Fy "�'' ��'"' •°f�Tb�^>t`a��""�.�, r'`�`.T. �.I:iia y'i �%:'a"ais;,`";-, N"; `>N FEMA 100 YEAR FLOOD "-�"'� _ e ""'<s �°>u-� "a" �`u�a—•`f+, ^v >�s-a;,_xe::+°ev<`-r,�.�.:.'aoh,`3.,TY��>>�-'"t,tad3°>.,fi"yx+"„> .fir �F:_ "�-`'`�.a af,>fAf,r,c.swe.�f�:a f. -§"a"s�°�,R�"+.�.`«""`>ver”<,<.a°.'a�`"a�,>�a,, `°'-'S"�.•,•'9.;Fw°'��'fia°f a`•'a,A.�'a�.< W?`avb,L 8',>:` ^: .,, ^'^e'w.r,s-r, :'�-:ag->4a�P2 _•�°-te �a"s�_;k— `F_—_a s—_:— "k_— _`T—ak_—_� —_ �a�">a'°a"",�t.,�.>kg`s•sa<' — _aN-A>W.:_ST-<R-?,E.�<1.E<<�^T fi1d00-0- "—_EM_R�' "00<dS.g4_<iQAR VqrA�_TxsOO.+ _ t�� •pi": > 6ELE� tat `' 0 �, p "� � _ '°ao` b :6 II �.�.....,w°ra ,aw�....,,.�>. ^�'va.",e` 2c�``� n.r„c..,. a�.i4x''d".�A:�wi>�" ° .rr....a F..ssna amu. '">mk✓>aa `T°. o<'-�e I TWEST ELEVATION SCALE 114•=r�0• O_ F- U ZD Ir F-- TOP OF EXISTING RIDGE HEIGHT 121'-7" I )I O (MEAN HC.T.F EXISTING RIDGE 7224') L.L. __—_______—_________— TOP OFNEVJBEDROORI MDGE113'-7', O -7,-T'' NO DATE BY DESCRIPTION T--- _ i 4 j� " �' �`� � � .__.._,.. REVISIONS i (6•' _ — — _°..r- Y �ry}jI I °.-•- -�i,_-_ _-_-----:- ---`- -- rteTx�uaaeoIlnsHxssExNALLF FIRST FLOOR 101-11' FLOODOMPLI•T%EVATO) __E—R_CE 10_1 o ___—____ � . NEWGRADE100-17' mwrRxeRsSslwRPaEOeRrNcUm9oW1arv9lsoRtRnnu�ocJwRTenwTrtrve1FEsooOe,oE0scaNlusa1muoReAe+C+sarr, sEo sR mscwalED SIML RAWAmv9E REvaRtra FEMA 100 YEAR FLOOD NAW STREET 100'-0' -^` - - i' 3-:-.,I,.T:, rt: .r- ' - roi�aR°arEcr 8 V ELEVATION — '—-—-Q5. ' ._ ____—.—. 4-_'w+..�- `�`..,+.;,.-,..v7`"._1�_ s as. -—-—- NAW STREET 100'-0•=.:r - - _,.*- _�_'S-�-.y.''z""rq-'' I ..�'e, .>.., _ �` _ °a•'°'�3�a^a..,.,;a, �.��� ranlEcrwm,E N'��':°6" a'"'�c''�''T�'' "?°' �•^,3�" `��'"���`�"a-,a" a ,"^'�"M "t`a'i;^ 'S PRINCIPLE DWELLINGADDRION&ALTERATIONS -;-a.` »� ,At Z' f "a:n ^+ ..v`v '�•^ - :`y��'3` �i>. a�, Caa`� ` � <m" €±. e .c �"t &R, .��;;.:° e-k' °vm •,�°"a,' �m�.� -�� �� r as _,�,> °_«> ��a, t�< .��`�" e>< -� :%'-: ` 2 ".. , �, °� ,, <a, °a' TB VINCEN ERTAULT -•'z � �R4+ a�€T,vS.,� sy 9'a T ,pC< „> \Ss`,- 95 A Y TREETORIENr NEW YORK 11957 DWELLING ELEVATIONS DATE 991530 DRAWINGNO JOB NO 1959 i 6RAWN DS SCALE AS SHOWN - ®SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 114-=1'-O' BRVEIEWE°GROG GARY R. O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA TOP QF SHED RIDGE 111 6• 8 CORYELL STREET NY LIC 026554 - a7 ------------ LAMBERTVILLE NJ 08530 PHONE 6093973635 v WALL LEGEND x EXISTING WALLTO REMAIN - - NEW WALL ZONING COMPUTATIONS ZONING DISTRICT R-40 REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED _ •' 24'-2'x' --- - LOTREQUIREMENTS - =✓ 1 Y MIN LOT SIZE 40,000 S F 19,905 S F NO CHANGE 3'-0" 18'-2— 3'-0" PROPERTY GRADE 100'-0' MIN LOT WIDTH 150 FT 104 FT NO CHANGE F,q� �� �� �" �°;, �:•� �°�"��- „°�<< ,' �� .M 3��\:. 1�, MIN LOT DEPTH 175 FT 207 FT NO CHANGE� - `, ~� N PRINCIPAL BUILDING MINIMUM YARD HT REQUIREMENTS -- ",. .�y v:?. -- 4" �o'• o:.,�' ,u`?d§w,,,'^mss t ","� .e. _ REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED ' FRONT YARD 50' 108' NO CHANGE "y - ,sy9'"_-`" SIDE YARD 15' 166'855' 166'84064' REAR YARD 50' 106.5' 90' , MAX HEIGHT 35 FT 21' NO CHANGE _ m 2 12STY 2STY NO CHANGE EXISTING SHED " E; 2 co PROPOSED CABANA `�;r a�, LARGEST FLOOR AREA(INCLUDING COVERED PORCH( 2,001 SF^ I' - Ab NEW BUILDING AREA. 613SF 2� NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 114'=1'-0' FLOOD HAZARD ZONE. AE-ELEVATION-6'.: EXISTING FLOOR ELEVATION PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION 8' COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED - o EXISTING DWELLING 950 S F , 17 EXISTING COVERED PORCH 210 S F EXISTING SHED 184 S F EXISTING BARN 930 S F PROPOSED NEWADDITION 613S PROPOSEDCOVERED PORCH 2283F -.jT, PROPOSED POOL 229SF DN. ,! 1, .ITL-TL._ PROPOSED SHED ADDITION 96SF I5 j• .,-.,.— �`j TOTAL 3•-0• 4'-0° 10'-21€r 4'-0" X-0" DWELLLING 950 S.F. 613SF 1,5635E • "' �+ `_ = - ,I TOTAL BUILDING AREAS 2.274 S F 1,157 S R 3.431 S F _ _IuL ; ALLOWED EXISTING PROPOSED ' I-L i i(y� _ MAX LO7COVERAGE 20% ..114k 172% A- �- � ` " SPECIFICATION OUTLINE >` ROOF '` "- s���, -� y" `�' a � ®a,+�\ �,� �a a � CEDAR SHINGLES,WEATHER NATURALLY SIDING' CEDARSHINGLES,WEATHER NATURALLY. EXPOSED FOUNDATION SMOOTHSTUCCO NEUTRAL EARTH TONE COLOR T B 0- WINDOWS CUSTOM WOOD WINDOWS TO MATCH EXISTING S D L.MUNTIN BARS W!SPACER BAR WALKWAYS BLUE STONE OR SIMILAR NATURAL STONE PROPOSED SHED FLOOR PLAN SCALE 114•=1--0• WEST ELEVATION SCALE 114•=1-0- 1 ` -^-----TOP OFSHED RIDGE 112-6 Q Q BY DESCRIPTION- "'- a�- re r € I ?�r;�? � ---•- I REVISIONS - ITIS TNERESPCNSM3TIYOFTHECONTRACTOR TOVE2FYAlLFC TRUCTIONSpNOCOM SARE BF.fORE CONMENC Na ACTNBES,ERRORS, ..�„- _ - — -- --- -- 0MMi551ONSORA OTRERINCONSISTENL`ES `. '� '- [ -r _ "_• ' _ • { nlsw ET�D�SHA11'XlkE TELYBEREPoRTEO CT ". ,:x °',m.".,,S�yz ii PROTECT NNIE - PROPERTY GRADE 700'-0' ="`%- - a - " " - - r ,, �-_ - PRINCIPLE DWELLING ADDITION 8 ALTERATIONS",-•aT - 4 �F;°\^'' P,,r� "-ss t �ti` s� �.I'P r.. „; ";; ,v,gew< i=:--�.,�.-:"e ,�,:�;i" 4,c .ate- ""y �• - tom.,. ,e (� - *i', VINCENT BERTAULT � 95 NAVY STREET. x ,���to e:ry � �",r, °��,, .a€ 'r •-�"a"�' �'.��. ��rF� ':� >. ..� -�£' �°s ta�y�. �;xs-' �'� '; ;�� . v �a" `c ;� ,^�� _r`�"; r-� ORIENT,NEW YORK 11957 SHED PLAN 8 ELEVATIONS DATE 091520 DRAWINGNO T 10B NO 1950 d DRAYM DS SCALE AS SHOWN A_R BY v 1�EAST ELEVATION SCALE 114•=1-0 ®SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 114=r-o REVIEWED GRDC TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST BUILDING DEPARTMENT Do you have or need the following,before applying? TOWN HALL Board of Health SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 4 sets of Building Plans TEL:(631)765-1802 Planning Board approval FAX:(631)765-9502 Survey Southoldtownny.gov PERMIT NO. Check Septic Form N.Y.S.D.E.0 Trustees C.O Application Flood Permit Examined 20 Single&Separate Truss Identification Form Storm-Water Assessment Form Contact: Approved 20 Mail to: Disapproved a/c Phone Expiration —20 Building Inspector APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date October 5, .20 20 INSTRUCTIONS a.This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4 sets of plans,accurate plot plan to scale.Fee according to schedule. b.Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas,and waterways. c.The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d.Upon approval of this application,the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant.Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e.No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f.Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date.If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim,the Building Inspector may authorize,in writing,the extension of the permit for an addition six months.Thereafter,a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold,Suffolk County,New Yor and other applicable Laws,Ordinances or Regulations,for the construction of buildings,additions,or alterations or for re oval or demolition as herein described The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws,ordinances,building code, ousing code,and re tions,and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. ( ' ture of apliclLpt or name,if a corporation 95 Navy St.,PO Box 51,Orient,NY 11957 (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner,lessee,agent,architect,engineer,general contractor,electrician,plumber or builder Owner Name of owner of premises Vincent Bertault (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation,signature of duly authorized officer (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. Plumbers License No. Electricians License No. Other Trade's License No. 1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: 95 Navy Street Orient House Number Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 26 Block 01 Lot 12.2 Subdivision John H.Woodhouse& Filed Map No. 11245 Lot 2 Jeryilyn B Woodhouse 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy b. Intended use and occupancy 3. Nature of work(check which applicable):New Building X Addition Alteration Repair Removal Demolition Other Work Accessory swimming pool. 4. Estimated Cost tbd. Fee (To be paid on filing this application) S. If dwelling,number of dwelling units Number of dwelling units on each floor NA If garage,number of cars 6. If business,commercial or mixed occupancy,specify nature and extent of each type of use. 7. Dimensions of existing structures,if any:Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories 8. Dimensions of entire new construction:Front_= Rear22' Depth 10' Height NA Number of Stories NA 9. Size of lot:Front 85.71' Rear 65.93.54.53' Depth 207.70' 10.Date of Purchase 6/24/05 Name of Former Owner Mr-&Mrs. John H.Woodhouse 11.Zone or use district in which premises are situated R-40 12.Does proposed construction violate any zoning law,ordinance or regulation?YES_NO X 13.Will lot be re-graded?YES X NO Will excess fill be removed from premises?YES NO X 14.Names of Owner of premises Vincent Bertault Address 95 Navy Street Phone No. 917-667-4166 Name of Architect Address Phone No Name of Contractor Address Phone No. 15 a.Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland?*YES NO X *IF YES,SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES&D.E.C.PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b.Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland?*YES NO X *IF YES,D.E.C.PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16.Provide survey,to scale,with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17.If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below,must provide topographical data on survey. 18.Are there any covenants and restrictions with respect to this property?*YES NO X *IF YES,PROVIDE A COPY. STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY Vincent Bertault being duly swom,deposes and says that(s)he is the applicant (Name of individual signing contract)above named, (S)He is the Owner (Contractor,Agent,Corporate Officer,etc.) r of said owner or owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have ormed the said work and to make and file this application; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of is knowledge and belief and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Swomi.o before me this day of X20 MAY KWAN CHEUNG No 01CH6020405 ublic.State of New Yo b'cOuahfied.n Queens County Signa a of Applicant My commission Expires 03/01/^1-9. GARY R.O'CONNOR ARCRrrECLALA �heey V lCOU isin_ST rruc.pms� wleEaivute. 22 ettoh�spvsraals WALLLEGEND _ oumpx.ISrorswn hflr roll °a'°sw�rasa�ee � - � �llmseena � i�'";���'�>>i�;�,x�;'y,a�r>,''��a•�;�':'�'�.qt".�, $ ' .�;;,�.-.... �� I `` 1-"`"+s°`)c'"'�"'<`"ti'dkSy4�vx'�`-4;'•r: �°z!r =a': y'l"»"c''<-°r-..f'" »yt3 .* ,.r+"F'':PuF PVEFOR0n4 k%f _.,+^':... ?v''�.•sNe3Ykw�i..,.^.rv'd B-a4 aG �acxiaitels�`�.41 ' <�`x � - - I ��`. ��*;�„��� „,fir_.�.•A"._:� mlmna�a L��' r ;:�;.•; 4 hk�%; t Mi; =?;��4,.���:+��.:V,��.;�;��#of z •\•\ rra r>...___r ----i`��` z;"!'',:=f�s'r"$'�":j:# r"� is ,..-Au�,.'a`=.r'g'p�•.. C3 Sm Cf co '`fid}'"- % I` <�,•�:�:�;b I,;_ ; �;1u" """'i;a"i" :•'t'a' q,mykv ,°k`'�...'„�#"^°":'�*, Z V ce y I pasean :�.' tea . %2 eeT 3` t z yt syy^ O 3 E`er' I 1 =; �( FUSrt+eE Yw516tB10.R9DY Eyljlg_B®ROp4 z� x���� ee�m�sllnnaevav ' l FEVWM -HE-'T'i�. �';, i>�#:s�v....X.�,".�L'��"4��'>t'.^k$�r A$^'3�3u>x"•�''�'`3�X3.5; �Y�i oao�w•.a Ph W CB'IEOM91a41id.1fgN h/ilpn111n11r 1 w�sxrxsr nxsttrr�rer omean�pxcllm i PROPoSED%ANS A-5 ! PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN wlr•x.ra PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR I ROOF PLAN srdGw.ra m`"°lea_ 1 t our Unique 1l�axiella Qstrosia,Chairperson vc,��g trey Town Hall Annex Anne Surchin,Vice Chair `�,`'Q �rw,� 4375 Route 25 JosephMecarthy N P. O. Box 1179 Fabiola Santana SLLMGUTHCLD Southold,NY 11971 AllanAR�exla = _ Z ;„ Fax: (631) 765-9502 Fa Cd yo Telephone: (631) 765-1802 Tracey Dwyer,:�dminisfixati�=e Assistant Qp www.southoldtownnygov 9FSERVATION June 8,2021 Ms. Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chair Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road P. 0. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms.Weisman and members of the Zoning Board of Appeals, RE: 95 Navy Street, Orient,SCTM #1000-26-1-12.2 Owner: Vincent Bertault I am writing with reference to the Laserfiche number 7468SE available on the ZBA website. The exterior elevations dated 12.15.2020 show two garage doors on the north elevation. As of this writing the HPC has issued a 2014 Certificate of Appropriateness based on the relocation of this historic barn with conditions that include"the proposed relocation of the historic barn and shed,according to the plans submitted,will result in the structures being restored and preserved as is,and the proposed relocation of the barn and shed will afford the applicant the ability to maximize the use of his property while preserving the character of the structures." This 2014 Certificate of Appropriateness was based on October 2013 plans depicting elevations that would preserved facades as is (2013 elevation copy attached). The 12.15.2020 elevations in Laserfiche number 7468SE indicate an intent to seek approval from the Zoning Board for something that will not fulfill the obligation of the HPC 2014 Certificate of Appropriateness. In addition,there is a notation on these plans indicating that the applicant is awaiting approval from the ZBA for a rendering of a Special Exception. It should also be noted that the 12.15.2020 plans are subject to HPC approval. The recent Building Department permit for the 4'wall/retaining wall/fence bypassed the HPC and has resulted in our inability to issue a stop work order for something that was never brought before the HPC. I have come to learn that the Building Department does not issue permits for fences that are 4'or less. Perhaps the form and foundation work involved with the concrete structure being used by this applicant may be why a permit was issued by the Building Department. This does not change the fact that a Certificate of Appropriateness was never sought or given. In question is the height to the peak of this structure. You'll note the elevation indicates the height at the peak as 119'-7"and shows the finish floor at 100'on the Laserfiche number 7468SE. During a 6.7.2021 field inspection,it was discovered that the foundation wall sits at 45" above the natural grade at the front of the building now located at Willow Street, where the only natural grade remains. The height of the roof peak from the natural grade currently measures 23' 5". (Photographs to support these facts are provided here). The maximum height for a lot sized of 19,904 square feet,as indicated that this property is on John Ehler's survey of 11.4.02,the accessory structure should be no greater than 20'for a 15'side yard setback or 22'for a 20'side yard setback. Please note on the 12.15.2020 site plan by Gary O'Connor,both the top of wall and bottom of wall measurements are indicated to be 6'8" illustrating more inaccuracy. (copy attached) Given these circumstances,that this building was raised without the applicant coming before the HPC,and a history of stop work order actions plus the numerous inaccurate figures reported on the site plans, I have no confidence that the HPC 2014 determination has been or will be adhered to or that it will result in the barn being built as presented. This letter is intended to assure you and the members of the ZBA that I am committed to the vision and mission that established the Historic Districts but think it would be fair to all concerned to have complete, current and up-to-date corrected plans prior to further work being done at this property. Thank you,in advance,for your consideration of these issues. Sincerely, Mariella Ostroski, Chair Historic Preservation Commission cc: Anne Surchin,Joe McCarthy, Fabiola Santana,Allan Wexler; Commissioners, HPC Mike Verity, Building Department NOTE M Pur DXONINMUTTS OATAFNOM Eu vxEnAxeoU PECCAICSIIf[.4YMSP.C- WILLOW STREET % GARY R.O'CONNOR salmwan xEwrawcnnl -_—_.—__—_ EL43' I DF<EI®EA I;Nll N65°Ta'30•E 6593' % ARCHITECT AIA xamlaEna xio ° _ az IT.-wTNE1 Icmo:>r IA ERT T.11 1 w PNCNE fi49]91}61! PROJECT DATA h __, _ _ N p�ySp�Nw.2P[oorou mrxsnxalen rawPNnrtw •P ';u E149'.w T _ __ aausmwcPToww N89°s6'06°E _ 54 53' _ `-. a. r,w 6"--•—•- ZONING COMPUTATIONS '- ��EL 66' esmeen vsm m���E¢ ITT m uN.�Nlvati¢a�Pm eea9nE2 ____s"w'• :E,�«Faa,R„ NST s� w lk � a�T�m�I��.IT�IMPmP�rP Aw �N�,fiarPNt� FR GARIN. T w d¢ m w i v�- IyyY j �1S' _PS iY FR HSE. I< ��' I � �///e rY-).t" O 7TI�9tr.`,..a oaauAws Damn IEem'm momuc TO ! Q f o f mo Y i ___ _ _____-y I_an%vx rm ,,.rnr&oofyx NEVILOr9 UI aw ss PxoPosmrtwu.n- i � ���.„ Pna�n '•rt3 _ (mt� 166 ANcMGEEETBxtx ON NAWaiNFET ITS �EOOxffCCNCEWTtYCRS,P.C. N:¢i"vmut� 1 I � PL3a MI) nrunaRxn 6uf ttnrt4mn J FYI Bb �. xirT O SIIERAN Pp[1�tipAtA6IDNMG COMMATI0N9 - aw ae I ---_-----_---126 23' EL 4 6'1 rove r Pw -- ------•----------•---- — — - ---•--- awaP � _ I saz°as'4o w n as'NAVY STREET sa6°�e'zotiv" - as iters o__.—_.-- SITE PLAN I. °m A-1 GARY R.O'CONNOR ARCHRECT AIA euavEusiaEEr xruc.a�vs. w�aEaimic x�sesw p,r V axoxE.sosnias�s I ----- ------ ----T -- --;T'.j _ ..L1 mimmm I e I I I 4 ----- ------- ---- "' -= �" ---- -- — --—— ——————— ,axEW xmert -- ae�iuQK�c,Hr_ Y 1 xi n weEO Ls I A-2 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN swew.: PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN.wew•.: GARY R O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA .. .. ... ... .. . . . . . .... . ... . . .... I uj I J I A, (I)NORTH ELEVATION q)WEST ELEVATION . . .. . ........ EH "T il"' 7 p'T -""' -FA-3 A-3 (3)SOUTH ELEVATION-. (24)EAST ELEVATION F March 2018 photograph at Willow Street on the original foundation 2020 photographs at Willow Street on raised foundation,still showing natural grade. illustrating natural grade. NO MIR �aN �q- 4,C r,�a`�"�,,�n�.'�'' _ ,>k - '"'� r,.:,.�"�"„^, - a E•-;�;� � ter,�` -.\_�;-,_,���,�.. °Y °�� °,•t��w1�1�`�"�, e`k �.i'. ;� y����I..,>".x*� ,4'' .rte ��'� - +,!``- ,+�i tk 'z ?: orf 5q - dj,All A; .°` t ���N, 06.07.2021 Willow Street side of barn with much of the natural 06.07.2021 Measurement of 45"from sill to natural grade at Willow grade disturbed. Street with inset for reading purposes. . 99 Ira 2 hftp://24.38.28 228*2040/webl in k/O/d oc/999897/Page 1.asp Elevations on the 10.18.2013 site plan. Gay K 17 c F �M4 7; exsnecEww FLOORPLAN iT 'T 11111111 P.t ;LDEAili 1N5T UVAM" FIRM FLOOR FLM Aj L4O�ELEVMON 6/11/2021 Bertault-95 Navy St-Laser fiche WebLink Laserfiche WebLink My WebLink I Help I About I Sign Out Home Browse Search TownOfSouthold > Historic Preservation Commission > Certificate of Appropriater Metadatal Thumbnallsllnnotatlons ,Q 80 /48 Go PDF Entry Properties ' Last modified 1/25/2019 8:26:29 AM � Creation date 1/24/2019 12:15:32 PM 1 lfW OF PROF05ED BARN,LOCATIONl FROM VINCENT 5TRFFT :2 Metadata Fields Template: Historic Preservation Commission Tax Map Number ' 1000-26.-1-12.2 Hamlet tn �A Orient FRONT VIEW OF BERTAULT DARN AND PRECEDENCE OF BARN CARNAGE HUUHS Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9©1998-2015 Laserfiche.All rights reserved. 24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/0/doc/999897/Page1.aspx 1/1 6/11/2021 Bertault-95 Navy St-Laserfiche WebLink Laserfiche WebLink My WebLink I Help I About I Sign Out Home Browse Search TownOfSouthold > Historic Preservation Commission > Certificate of Appropriater Metadata Thumbnails Annotations4 ♦ 30 /48 Go PDF A Entry Properties L Last modified 1/25/2019 8:26:29 AM Creation date 1/24/2019 12:15:32 PM Metadata Fields Template: Historic Preservation , Commission Tax Map Number 1000-26.-1-12.2 Hamlet Orient r I �tR S., J ,FLSr Say BARN 1�ARR3AGE f15E, #3 F;.fCrfi$TK�R,'34d_liT,Nr h lX3:N7GL f 6J(:Id?r"F,�t��L 5r�L7 w I C'17 Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9©1998-2015 Laserfiche All rights reserved 24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/0/doc/999897/Page1.aspx 1/1 6/11/2021 Bertault-95 Navy St-Laserfiche WebLink Laserfiche WebLink My WebLink I Help I About I Sign Out Home Browse Search TownOfSouthold > Historic Preservation Commission >Certificate of Appropriater Metadata �Thumbnai s Annotations [::K/ Go PDF - pan my.�—z'trrc.-r�rww.w�x—M�� - ---• 2 Entry Properties a AW 4 M Grf"%eg NS MIeYwIS mo rin �Ep � nt C e" cr w ♦� n Last modified �r` ' 1/25/2019 8:26:29 AM 5 a a ruotra®a �� f ct Ccrcx! 58iL Sar to:rsc Creation date o 1/24/2019 12:15:32 PM 6 eua9 om 5 a lG�r�ete,� kaYS d A c �p� C� arzror�r hp aar .. Metadata dEssn RT �t MlebJaO. Fields 'IFT > A " 1'V &d csrTemplate: Historic Preservation Commission „Tax Map Number1000-26.-1-12.2Rik Hamlet Yea r r� Orient a ( fr` ��,,,,�, a u RA In [ D I q ¢asa k gui2r�g Dada [A” faKrC.e �`ishe'w44 000 m 9 F Ok"Tac v SQ ra F N R W ! yr Q�1 +g Ilk l K rs I�Pum aapn P is Ca"ape 4uoi read Rot Wj�'9 N w C r POW imp ad YrrA 'el on�N+sh+cYo rd I.acat�rs Yo Yud Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9©1998-2015 Laserfiche All rights reserved 24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/0/doc/999897/Page1.aspx 1/1 6/11/2021 Bertault-95 Navy St-Laserfiche WebLmk Laserfiche WebLink MyWebl-ink I Help I About I Sign Out Home Browse Search TownOfSouthold > Historic Preservation Commission > Certificate of Appropriater MetadataThumbnails Annotations �. ,+, 31 /48 Go PDF Entry Properties MTFR � —::�---- �—to R�SfRd�CeA �COhL fl00R8 0'�--_ Last -- modified 1/25/2019 8:26:29 AM Creation date 1/24/2019 12:15:32 PM � cwwaa rata a Metadata Fields r17 Template: Historic Preservation L�__ Commission Tax Map Number 1000-26.-1-12.2 Hamlet Orient a s BARN FLOOR PIAP! score IMI-nrn Document management portal powered by Laserfiche FdmurPMja 9•e Webl-ink 9©1998-2015 Laserfiche All rights reserved. 24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/0/doc/999897/Page1.aspx 1/1 LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER& GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD, P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565 r" ebressler@wbglawyers.com ® [V 0 � October 21, 2020 I J Hand Delivered OCT 2 2 2020 ���✓✓✓ Historic Preservation Commission SULDMIG DEPT. Edward Webb, Chairman TO 57'T ru'F J jTJTHOLD Town of Southold 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Vincent Bertault 95 Navy St., Orient,NY SCTM#1000-26-1-12.2 Dear Mr. Webb and Board Members: We are the attorneys for Vincent Bertault, ("Bertault"), and write in furtherance of his application to renovate and expand his house and shed on his property, ("Project") and in response to the October 19, 2020 letter, ("Letter") from Evan and Lynn Lewis, (" Lewis") regarding the Project. The contents of the Letter provide no basis for denial or modification of the Project. Thus, we ask that the Project be approved as applied for. At the outset, we note that the Letter raises no substantial issues with respect to the Project. Rather, it supports the Project. Indeed, Lewis concedes that when weathered the Project will be "very in keeping"with other properties in and around the Village. The thrust of the Letter is directed toward issues which are not before the Committee and, in part, will never come before the Committee. As noted in our earlier letter of October 19, 2020, the barn is not a part of the Project before the Committee. Thus, any issues regarding the barn which fall within the Committee's jurisdiction will be addressed in connection with any subsequent application as to the barn. Thus, the comments in the Letter concerning the barn are irrelevant. The comments in the Letter concerning the proposed pool are similarly irrelevant to the Project. Moreover, issues concerning the pool will not be before the Committee at any time, as they do not fall within Section 170-6 of the Southold Town Code. We are constrained to note, however, the location of Lewis' recently built shed virtually on top of the mutual property line. Finally, the comments in the Letter concerning the nature and timing of work are a matter for neighborly discussion, as they are plainly without the jurisdiction of the Committee. It is evident from the Letter that Lewis does not fully understand the purpose and charge of the Committee. This application is not a forum for discussions of matters extrinsic to the Project. Such irrelevance notwithstanding, our client is always available to discuss neighborhood issues in a non-adversarial manner with interested parties. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Very trul yours, Eric ressler EJB/cs LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER& GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD, P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 ` .17 TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565 V ebressler@wbglawyers.com DD October 19, 2020 OCT 2 0 2020 Hand Delivered BS I Dzn- Historic Preservation Commission Edward Webb, Chairman Town of Southold 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Vincent Bertault 95 Navy St., Orient,NY SCTM#1000-26-1-12.2 Dear Mr. Webb and Board Members: We are the attorneys for Vincent Bertault, (`Bertault"), and write in furtherance of his application to renovate and expand his house and shed on his property, ("Project") and in response to the written objections of Ellen McNeilly, ("Objectant") dated September 26, 2020, ("Objections"). We do not believe that the Objections are relevant to the Project or based in fact and law. Accordingly,we ask that the Objections be disregarded and the Project be approved. The Objections raise five arguments in opposition to the Project. Each of these arguments is addressed in detail below and is shown to be without merit. The Objectant first asserts that there exist violations of the Historic Preservation Commission Resolution#6.17.14.1 dated June 18, 2014, ("Resolution"). This assertion should be rejected for four reasons. First, the Resolution is irrelevant to the approval of the Project. The Project must be measured by Southold Town Code §170-8, "Criteria for approval of alteration of fagades of historic landmarks". A resolution on a different application is not within the factors set forth in Southold Town Code §170-8. Second, assuming, arguendo, that the Resolution is relevant (which it is not), it did not impose any conditions or obligations on Bertault with respect to the Project or otherwise. Rather, it reflected in its recitals only Bertault's good faith intentions as to flora. Third, again assuming, arguendo, the relevance of the Resolution(which it is not), it speaks only to events occurring and during relocation of the barn. Damage to the willow tree occurred long after such relocation. Indeed, during such relocation of the barn, Bertault expanded considerably extra expense in ensuring the integrity of the willow tree's root system by having much of the excavation work performed by hand. Finally, again assuming, arguendo, the relevance of the Resolution(which it is not), Bertault has justified the treatment of the then 1 existing trees and shrubs during the relocation of the barn, to wit: the economic justification for not relocating the hollies Thus, the Resolution is irrelevant to the Project and, in any event, no violation thereof occurred. The Objectant next asserts that the Project should be limited to the house only and should not include the shed and barn. This assertion should be rejected for three reasons. First, the assertion is superfluous since the accessory barn is not the subject of the Project. Second, the accessory shed is subject to review by the Committee only under Southold Town Code §170-8. We note, however, the use and location of the shed are "of right"under the Southold Town Code Zoning Code since the use of the shed as a pool cabana is permitted in the zoning district and the location of the shed is permissible in the rear yard, no variances are necessary. Sanitary issues are for the Suffolk County Health Department, not the Committee. All necessary approvals will be obtained in connection with the Project. Finally, the plans for the shed are entirely consistent with requirements of Southold Town Code §170-8. The Objectant next asserts the existence of a"misleading" incremental approach to obtain permits for the Property. These assertions should be rejected for four reasons. First, there is nothing inherently misleading or improper in addressing issues with respect to a particular property in an incremental manner. Indeed, where multiple structures are involved, it is a generally accepted approach. Second, an incremental approach does not diminish the ability of the Committee to apply the factors set forth in Southold Town Code §170-8 to each applicable action. Third, whatever Bertault's "vision" for the property may entail, implementation of that "vision"may be obtained incrementally and is nonetheless subject to all necessary approvals, which Bertault has diligently sought and now seeks. Finally, the Objectant implies that"owner enjoyment" is somehow an impermissible motivating factor. This astounding proposition is patently false, as recognized by both the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals in its April 17, 2014 determination (finding#6) and by this Committee in Resolution#6.17.14.1 (7`h recital). Owner enjoyment is one of the principal aspects of property ownership and should be denigrated. The Objectant next asserts that the potential existence of other regulatory approvals somehow should negatively impact the Committee's review of the Project. This assertion is without basis and only serves to confirm the Objectant's concession that she is not"well versed in code compliance". The Committee is charged with a specific review function, as are other regulatory agencies. Each should discharge only its responsibilities. Finally,the Objectant asserts in a generalized manner that she is unhappy with the architectural aspects of the Project. Respectfully, the Committee should be guided by the dictates of Southold Town Code §170-8 and not the personal tasks of the Objectant. The Objectant raises only one factual objection to the Project, albeit false. Specifically, Objectant erroneously asserts that the proposed addition to the residence involves "double height". In fact, the proposed addition is lower than the existing two-story structure at only one and one-half stories. Objectant opines as to the "modern" approach is not based in fact and is belied by the similar architectural features and lines shared by existing residence and proposed addition. Similarly, Objectant opinion that the modest addition to the shed somehow renders it"unshed like" is not based in fact. The Objectant's opposition to the Project taken as a whole is reflective of nothing more than the continuing desire of a neighbor to limit Bertault's use of his property and impose her vision on the property. No cognizable basis for denial of this application is set forth. Accordingly, we ask that the Project be approved. Thank you. Very truly yours, Eric J. ressler EJB/cs LzI JUN 1 3180 Orchard Street 6 2021 PO Box 473 Orient,NY 11957 °' ' 631-323-3501; 631-276-8958 q June 13, 2021 To: Southold Town Board of Appeals Re: 95 Navy Street—Bertault Application The Orient Historic District was officially designated in 1976, aligned with the celebration of the Bicentennial. It has been a source of pride and has offered a sense of participation in the rich history of this small place at the end of Long Island for generations of Orient residents, whether descendants of the founding families or "incomers" who have made Orient home. Like all historic districts it is also fragile, and its preservation has had to rely over the years not only on the dedication of those who chose to live in and preserve the historic structures, but also on a patchwork of legislations rethought and revised over the years, to greater or lesser success, as development pressure has increased throughout the East End. The community has confronted two very troublesome applications within the last year, both of which would have unalterably transformed the integrity of the District. Thankfully, the first has been resolved, but only after much anxiety and activism on the part of the community, which had been brought much too late into the discussion, defying a significant element of the relevant Town law. The same appears to be true with this application, which presents perhaps the greatest threat to the cohesion and sense of place that the district has faced. Whether with the approval of various committees or without it, work has been proceeding which, if allowed to stand,will create the greatest intrusion into the atmosphere of the district that we have seen. It should be stopped. The application has revealed one issue related to the district which must be addressed up front in a unified way. That is the means of dealing with a potential rise in the waters of the bay without elevating the buildings. Such elevation would completely destroy the integrity of the historic landscape, and the issue cannot be addressed piecemeal. As I have pointed out during the discussion of the house on Skipper's Lane, Orient (formerly Oysterponds) was a community of working people. The owners of large farms and the successful whaling captains built relatively large homes on the Main Road,but the village itself consisted of relatively modest homes of carpenters and shopkeepers, seamstresses and innkeepers, fishermen and shoemakers.Needless to say there were no swimming pools; whether they should have been permitted at all in the district is a serious question, but at least the insistence on placement in the rear of the house lends some visual protection, and certainly no variances should be given. There are no walled properties in the district; but the installation of a major wall around this property is in progress. If it has been approved by Historic Preservation, I think the community deserves an explanation. If there has been no permission, a stop work order should be issued. It is an entirely alien element and destroys the cohesion of the district. There should be no approval of a ramp to a garage or other alterations to the existing ground level. The Historic District is no place for an elaborate vacation home (with a "cabana"!),two pools (?), and a ramped parking garage; it is a mockery of the integrity of the district. A comparison with the old photograph of the simple house and its tree is poignant. There is plenty of land in Orient available for the sort of development this application proposes. There is no justification for permitting it in the designated Historic District. There will continue to be the kind of pressure on the district that we are seeing if the Town and its agencies do not agree on meeting it with not only strong regulation but also strong resolution. Also, the community should have an opportunity for early input on all committee decisions, as per the legislation. It might also be a good idea for the Town to create a clearly written guide laying out the specific restrictions of the district, which realtors would be required to give to potential purchasers. The Town should also consider more collaboration between the various committees in addressing all of the contributing factors in a coherent and unified way rather than piecemeal. The problem will only become worse, and we are in great danger of losing an invaluable and irreplaceable sense of place. Sincere FN Fredrica Wachsberger cc. Historic Preservation Committee; Planning Board Ellen McNeilly PO Box 314 Orient NY 11957 631-323-3989 eimcneillVCD_earthlink.net October 20, 2020 Historic Preservation Commission Edward Webb, Chairman Town of Southold Town"Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 - P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Application Dated 7/15/2020 95 Navy Street, Orient NY SCTM # 1000-26-1-12.2 Supplemental Submission Dear Chairman Webb and Board Members: The following serves as a supplemental submission to the letter and materials dated September 26, 2020 providing key documents to support my position on the above application. As of today, the second amended application that was provided solely in hard copy by the applicant has yet to be made available for public view.' Prior to the public hearing on Oct. 22nd, I hope to be able to review what will be discussed and modify any comments made below I strongly urge the Commission to rely on the 2014 decision to inform the review of the current application, as the same concerns relating to architectural appropriateness and restoration as well as the preservation of historic landscape features are at the heart of this amended application. Public Records request was made on Oct 1, 2020 for the following and to date, have not been provided: BUILDING DEPT: Building Permits Issued-#39186-Z(9/15/2014);#41328-Z(1/30/2017),#44198-Z(9/23/2019)and subsequent permits issued as result of any approvals by HPC and ZBA of current applications under review.; Copy of Johnson Tree Co. letter dated July 30,2014 as part of HPC Cert. of Approp June 18 2014; If applicable-Notice of Disapproval of Amended Plan under current review at HPC dated 9-15-2020, Certificate of Occupancy subsequent to current dated June 15,2005-CO nbr Z-30982. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Copy of covenant referred to in SC Dept Health Envir. Quality letter dated Nov 18, 2004 associated with ZBA#5218; Any permits and/or code violations relating to environmental quality, particularly sanitary systems, given that infrastructure work has been performed at the subject site. CODE ENFORCEMENT- Online"Town Code Complaint Form" notification made March 12,2020, but received no reply nor action,All Code Enforcement Reports: (1)specifically relating to 2014 HPC Cert Appropriateness on or about 9-11-2020, (2) Code violation reports since 2005. Ellen McNeilly 1 The Applicant's disregard to the directives in the 2014 decision and the strength of the Commission's authority matter greatly to the community and its trust in the Town's advocacy for the people they serve. Simply put, non-compliance "bad" behavior should not be rewarded. Architectual Integrity and Significance N?HEREAS, the proposed relocntj,riri of the historic baric andshed, t1le plirris submitted,Kill result,in--dxe strCiewres`bpi iOstpr �d`and pres ived as is;dnd The single-family house, the accessory shed and the accessory barn can all be viewed from either Navy Street or Willow Street and therefore are the Commission's concern. �Xl_Te A a � Single Family House: As has been pointed out by the Commission, the enlargement expressed by the tower element with cupola for a dining area shows little historical reference or inspiration. The Applicant's priority for a first floor bedroom is achieved without this unnecessary double height "dining room". 4;sTa�PiuYR'u••� .. a -� Accessory Shed: Although the recently adopted Town Code :may '`=_' may allow for a change of use to a pool-cabana with other enhancements;°the existing 180-+ square foot shed is sufficient for that purpose. The proposed enlargement alters the building envelope making it unrecognizable as as a historic, accessory shed. Again, I urge that the Commission should stand firm to its 2014 decision that the accessory "...structures be restored and preserved as is." � Accessory Barn: It is clear that the Applicant's desire is to z convert the Accessory Barn to an accessory apartment with the anticipation that the building would undergo an extensive renovation, not restoration. Since 2014, the Applicant has subjected the Accessory Barn to a level of self-created disrepair. The long delay in restoring the roof framing and cover and the unfinished restoration puts the building in further jeopardy of being lost. Whether or not the ZBA will permit a change of use, 1 urge the Commission to re- state its directive to restore the existing,structure. The fenestration system of the existing Barn provides ample opportunity to satisfy any use. Historic character will be lost if continued neglect leads to a future request for a dramatically different architectural treatment, rendering it essentially a new building. Ellen McNeilly 2 Laridscape Features Holly Trees Destroyed — Need Replacement WHEREAS, the applicant has agreed to make a good faith effort to preserve the property's existing trees and shrubs(particularly the holly trees)during the relocation, process,and No "good faith effort" was made to preseve and relocate two, large, 4.IRM, mature Holly Trees due to the approved relocation of the accessory barn as directed in the 2014 decision. 16'kML CHF£IRT k I urge the Commission to require a modification of the amended plans to show Holly tree replacements on the subject site, i specifying a mature size, planting plan, and a timeline for planting. Willow Tree to be Preserved S' UREAS, a letter was submitted to the Landmarks Preservation Commission on July 30, 2014,by Mchael Johnson,of Johnson Tree Co,,Orient,outlining how to protect the willow tree adjacent to the proposed location of the Darn structure.The letter will be part of the applicants final building permit application and,it appears that the project requires no further review, The amended plans note that the mature, historic Willow tree as "Existing Willow Tree Trunk" suggesting the tree is dead. It is well documented t that the Applicant has neglected and made multiple attempts to destroy, not "preserve" as directed in the 2014 decision. Jonathan Shipman, a Certified Master Arborist, in the letter dated September'14, 2020 verifies that is "thriving". The Town's Code Enforcement has addressed the issue, but to date, the report has not been made available. I urge the Commission to require a modification of the amended plans to show an accurate depiction of the historic Willow Tree, and reiterate the important of preserving it. Any future use of the Accessory Barn may require some pruning, but not full destruction. Ellen McNeilly 3 Evergreen Screening for Proposed Pool Evergreen screening along the property line should be required in order to block the view and buffer the noise associated with the proposed pool, particularly as it relates to Mr. Lewis' adjacent property. Thank you very much for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, .e 2z Ellen McNeilly Resident and Owner: 205 Willow Street (Taxlot 26-1-4) . 70 Vincent Street (Taxlot 26-1-5) Ellen McNeilly 4 LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER& GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD, P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565 -.,y :� ,__„ ebressler@wbglawyers.com ,�1 t February 3, 2021 1� F E B - 3 2021 Town Board of the Town of Southold Attn: Elizabeth Neville Southold Town Clerk 53095 Route 25, P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Appeal of Vincent Bertault 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY Dear Ms.Neville: We are the attorneys for Vincent Bertault and submit herewith his appeal from the determination of the Southold Town Historic Preservation Commission denying his application for a Certificate of Appropriateness. Please advise as to when this matter will be calendared for a hearing before the Board. Thank you for your cooperation. Very t yours, Eric J. Bressler EJB/cs Ends. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION : FEB 3 2B�to�oS:- IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF Southold -own Clerk, VINCENT BERTAULT - 9 NAVY STREET ORIENT,NEW YORK 11957 NOTICE OF APPEAL_ ; i TO: THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: Vincent Bertault,by his attorneys Wickham, Bressler& Geasa,P.C.,hereby appeals to the Town Board of the Town of Southold pursuant to Southold Town Code 6 from the following action of the Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commission: E Resolution# 10.22.20.2 dated both December 17, 2020 and January 4,2021 which ` t denied Vincent Bertault a Certificate of Appropriateness for proposed renovations and expansion ' of his residence at 95 Navy Street, Orient,New York and each and every part thereof, :s ("Resolution"). A copy of the Resolution is annexed hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. The basis for the appeal is set forth in detail in the Statement In Support Of Appeal annexed hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B. E Dated: February 3, 2021 Mattituck,New York ; WICKHAM, B -$SLER&GEASA,P.C. ; ;PJric.rAincis Attornefont Bertault 13015 Main Road,P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck,New York 11952 631-298-8353 1 \,tl avkK,rk,.s S�C( To: William M. Duffy,Esq. Town Attorney for the Town of Southold 54375 Main Road,P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 5 Town Board of the Town of Southold Attn: Elizabeth Neville Southold Town Clerk 53095 Route 25,P.O. Box 1179 F Southold,New York 11971 Southold Town Historic Preservation Commission 53095 Route 25,P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 2 i s; LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER&GEASA, P.C.-, 13015 MAIN ROAD, P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) ; MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND < ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 , ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM s JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565All ebressler@wbglawyers.com February 3, 2021 s Town Board of the Town of Southold Attn: Elizabeth Neville Southold Town Clerk e °53095 Route 25,P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 V Re: Appeal of Vincent Bertault 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY Dear Ms.Neville: ' We are the attorneys for Vincent Bertault and submit herewith his appeal from the determination of the Southold Town Historic Preservation Commission denying his application for a Certificate of Appropriateness. Please advise as to when this matter will be calendared for a } hearing before the Board. Thank you for your cooperation. Very: -yours, -71 x Eric,.Bressler EJB/cs Ends. s i� i f k x i 3 i z 2 •N .. �.t } F i _. ._. .. a i i i s s 's s i i t 5 our t!hk Edward Webb,Chairperson ' Town Hall Annex Anne Surchin,Vice Chair 54375 Route 25 Robert Harper ur= '. PO Box 1179 Joseph McCarthy ; Southold,NY 11971 Mariella Ostroskif Fax(631)765-9502 Tracey Dwyer,Administrative Assistant Telephone:(631)765-1802 )bft southoldtawnny.�ov Town of Southold Historic Preservation Commission December 17,2020 RESOLUTION#10.22.20.2 ' S extifcateofnpro»�rtte>rtess - - REi11 95 Navy Street,Orient,NY SCTM#1000-26.-1-12.2 Owner: Vincent Bertault RESOLUTION; WHEREAS, 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY is on the Town of Southold Registry of Historic Landmarks, and building lies within the designated Orient Historic District according to the National Register of Historic Places and the State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO). WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 170-8 of the Town Code(Landmarks Preservation Code)-of the Town of Southold, all proposals for material change/alteration must be reviewed and granted a Certificate of Appropriateness by the Southold Town Historic Preservation Commission prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, and, WHEREAS, the applicants representative Gary R. O'Connor submitted a proposal to construct a rear addition to the structure,replace the windows, doors siding and roof on the entire structure, the reconfiguration of the front entry, conversion of an existing shed to a cabana and installation of a ' covered porch, and, WHEREAS, a pre submission hearing was held on August 18, 2020, where the applicants representative submitted drawings of the scope of work and outlined the project for the commission, and, s 2 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on October 22,2020,where the applicants representative submitted the final proposal of the project for the commission, and, S i WHEREAS, the property is currently in use as single family home and under the proposed plan that single family use remains. Therefore, the analysis of whether the proposed alteration is consistent with principles of adaptive reuse, whereby the principal historic features of the landmark are maintained while permitting the use of the landmark for new uses other than its original use is not applicable to this proposal. f WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission considered similarity in design, architecture and appearance of the proposed alteration with the historic design, architecture and appearance of both the original structure and those in the.surrounding historic district and determines as follows: 1. The proposed alteration will significantly change the appearance of the Navy Street facade since the front door and steps leading to the porch will be centered under the large dormer, The proposed 1-story addition facing to the rear of the Structure,,composed of a summer/dining room (15'-8" long,x 14' deep)rising 19' in height from the first floor elevation to the ridge, is in fact equivalent to a two-story house. Also proposed is a rectangular cupola s - adding another 3'-11"to the overall height of the structure. Part of the wing facing Willow Street also includes a new bedroom, 20' long stepped back 12" from the summer/dining room,running parallel to Navy Street. s f 2. The addition is not subservient to the principal building. While its ridge is 15" lower than the original house the new cupola of the addition is actually s higher than the house ridge. The massing of the rear dwarfs the scale of neighboring houses. The three wings together don't relate to one another or the neighbors and the inchoate and conflicted forms of the proposed alteration and addition just aren't compatible with the general historic character of the National Register Historic District. { r WHEREAS, the proposed construction is not necessary for compliance with the applicable building codes or other federal or state regulations, and, f WHEREAS, the proposed construction is not necessary to allow for a use of the property permitted by the Town Code in the applicable zoning district; WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to preserve the historic features of the landmark and its relation to the historic character of the community and Town as the subject property although altered over the years to be relevant for its time, still represents a fine example of the rural regional vernacular style typical S of Orient cottages in the 19th century. This cottage, with it existing front door offset from an axial stepped entrance, includes two dormers, one small and one large, puncturing the roofline but extending straight up in the same plane as the front wall, and along with an amalgam of small additions at the rear constitute the major features of this structure, all of which are visible from Navy Street, and, 2 F t "'OW`T tL +D $ t)I, ;>#lia'tlze`Soiitl�old Vii(` p cPis 1? Com�m�ssio rtlie r worlc_d e:�i�oye<xefet�ne�8:�a ; ':p led�.rn..th pPlca�iaxi ° #`pits to ri�+eet�ie:c�t��ia�o�a�g��Wa�ru��er'S��i4bN�7fl�& �'a�tiie Sot�tliold,�'owri�Coclesand, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the Commission denies the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, Pursuant to §170--7(C)(3) the Historic Preservation z Commission makes the following recommendations: 1. The linear link between the structures on Navy and Willow streets shows first floor fenestration east elevation composed of three casement windows sitting under'a dormer, which`-is the same width as the`window-ensemble below. This f elongated dormer with three awning windows awkwardly mimics the roof pitch of the side gable of the house on the east side of the cottage. If it had punctured the wall plane like the dormers on the front of the house or been designed as a shed dormer,the result would be more historically accurate. 2. If the scale of the addition were reduced and made sympathetic to the original existing house then the project might be viable. 3. Retain the off-center entry as such a design element is typical for Shingle era houses built during the 1880s-90s, f MOVER: Commissioner Harper SECONDER: Commissioner Surchin AYES: Webb, Surchin, Harper, McCarthy and Ostroski S ABSTAINED: Commissioner Santana RESULT:De Signed: Tracey L.Dwyer,Application ;p irdinator for the Historic servation-Commission Date: January 4,2021 4 4 F 7 3 S i f S i i t -loom%, t TOWN OF SOUTHOLD f HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ..n.......X x IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF VINCENT BERTAULT 9 NAVY STREET STATEMENT IN ORIENT,NEW YORK 11957 SUPPORT OF APPEAL TO: THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: Vincent Bertault, ("Vincent"), by his attorneys Wickham, Bressler& Geasa,P.C.,hereby submits this Statement in Support of his appeal from the denial by the Southold Town Historic 3 Preservation Commission, ("HPC"), of his application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for ' renovations and expansion of his residence at 95 Navy Street, Orient,NY, ("Project"), i Resolution#10.22.20.2 dated both December 17,2020 and January 4,2021, ("Resolution"). This statement sets forth the procedural history of the matter before the HPC,the facts concerning the { Project,the description of the Resolution, and the bases for appeal. For the reasons set forth x below the Resolution should be reversed and the Application granted. A. PROCEDURAL,HISTORY.. Vincent made application by Gary O'Connor,Architect, to the HPC for a Certificate of f Appropriateness for the Project on July 15,2020. A copy of the application is annexed hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 1, ("Application").An amended Application bearing even date was submitted on October 5, 2020. The amendment only removed from the Project a f F f proposed accessory apartment. A copy of the amended Application is annexed hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 2. Thereafter,Vincent attended two pre-submission conferences on August 4, 2020 and August 18, 2020 at which the drawings of the Project were discussed. The first pre-submission conference was extremely brief,to wit, approximately 10 minutes, and HPC 1 provided no useful feedback. At the second pre-submission conference, HPC raised the issue of the height of the proposed addition. In response thereto,Vincent lowered the height of the proposed addition so as to be less than that of the existing house. A public hearing was held on the Project on September 29,2020.At the public hearing, certain neighbors made largely irrelevant continents and objections and memorialized same in { writing. Although the hearing was closed on September 29,2020, HPC afforded a neighbor additional time to submit written comments.Vincent responded to all of the public comments. Copies of the comments are annexed hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 3. Vincent's responses to the comments are annexed hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 4. The matter L then appeared on the HPC calendar for October 22, 2020 but no action was taken and the matter was further adjourned. x Despite the closing of the hearing on September 29,2020,no determination on the s Application was made within 60 days thereafter as required by Southold Town Code ("Code") f §170-7(c)(1).Rather, on January 4,2021 the Project next again appeared on the HPC calendar and at that time a motion to grant the Application was made and seconded and thereafter unanimously disapproved with one abstention. There was no motion made as to any particular reason for denial and no vote taken on any particular reason for denial. The HPC Coordinator 3 was instructed to"write a letter"concerning the motion. When Vincent had not received anything in writing from HPC, his counsel contacted HPC counsel to ascertain the status of the matter. On January 15, 2021 a copy of the Resolution was e-mailed to Vincent's counsel. Copies of the recordings of the meetings have been requested but have not yet been received. Vincent now appeals to the Southold Town Board from the Resolution pursuant to Code §170-11. 2 B. THE PROJECT The house at 95 Navy Street is a single-family residence in the Orient Historical District approximately 181 years old. The Project involves replacement of windows, doors, siding and roof and construction of an addition to the rear of the house and a porch extension, all utilizing materials consistent with those of the existing structure. The house is to be raised for FEMA ; compliance and a failing foundation replaced. The lines of the proposed addition closely match those of the original house and are consistent with other structures in the neighborhood. C..,THE RESOLUTION. The Resolution dated both December 17, 2020 and January 4,2021 denied the Application on the following stated grounds: (1) The front door was centered underneath a second-floor dormer; F (2) The proposed addition is too high,without otherwise specifying an acceptable height. (3) The addition is too large and the style not consistent with neighborhood character. The Resolution made the following recommendations,presumably pursuant to Code §170-7(c)(3) (although the recommendations do not comply with Code requirements): (1) Convert the proposed gabled dormer on the east elevation fagade to a shed dormer or a greatly elongated gabled dormer because it would be"more historically t accurate". (2) Reduce the scale of the addition in an unspecified manner and unquantified amount so that the Project"might be viable". (3) Retain an off-center front door entry because same was typical for homes of the 1880-90's. 3 D. BASES FOR RELIEF The Resolution is deficient procedurally in five respects and substantively in six respects and therefore should be reversed and a Certificate of Appropriateness issued for the Project. a Each of those deficiencies is set forth below. t 1, PROCEDIIAlI T E I CIE1` CIES. i The Application was plagued by procedural deficiencies from the outset. These procedural deficiencies continued through the Resolution. These procedural deficiencies include: (a) The initial pre-submission conference was utterly devoid of substance as HPC gave the Application virtually no attention. As a result, a second pre-submission conference was required. (b) At the public hearing the stated grounds upon which the Application was denied x were either not discussed at all as in the case of the front door, or were not discussed with such • 3 specificity that Vincent could appropriately address them. `a (c) The HPC failed to comply with requirements of Southold Town Code §170- 3 9 7(c)(1)and render a determination on the Application within 60 days of the conclusion of the public hearing on October 22, 2020. (d) The HPC failed to comply with the requirements of Southold Town Code §170- ; 7(c)(3)by omitting from the Resolution specific recommendations to Vincent regarding the Project such that he could receive approval. (e) The Resolution failed to recite the correct dates of the two pre-submission hearings and the two public hearings. 2. SUBSTANTIVE DEFICIENCES The Resolution is similarly plagued by substantive deficiencies, each of which separately, 4 and all of which taken together evidence arbitrariness and capriciousness. In particular: (a) The Resolution incorrectly asserts that the proposed front entry is not off-center. In fact, it is to the right of center as appears from the drawings. There is no evidence in the record that the door, as proposed, is inconsistent with those in the neighborhood. Moreover, the 4 issue of the front door was never brought to Vincent's attention at either of the pre-submission hearings or either of the public hearing dates. Surely raising this issue on January 4,2021 at a f time when Vincent could not respond is patently inequitable and entirely arbitrary and capricious. Finally, raising of the home to meet FEMA requirements necessitated extended steps ; to the porch. In order to remain within the property line these steps were moved and the front door moved to a location opposite the steps. (b) The Resolution incorrectly asserts that the proposed addition to the rear of the ` existing structure is two stories high when,in fact, it is only one and one-half stories. Moreover, z the height was reduced from the original proposal at the request of the HPC and was never subject to further request for reduction. i (c) The Resolution incorrectly asserts that the proposed addition is not subservient to the original structure. In fact, the proposed addition is of lesser height and, therefore, subservient to the original structure. The original structure is a two-story house and the proposed addition is a combination of a one-story and one and one-half story construction. Under Code 170-8 subservience is not one of the approval criteria. (d) The Resolution, in purported Recommendation No. 2 asserts that the"project s might be viable" if the scale of the addition were revised and made sympathetic to original existing house without specifying or quantifying the changes deemed to be necessary. Thus, any reapplication to the HPC would entirely be made blind. In this regard, its bears repeating that the 5 height of the Project was already reduced at the request of HPC and Vincent was never advised that such a reduction'was not acceptable. Thus,Recommendation No. 2 fails to comply with Code §170-7(c)(3). (e) The Resolution in purported Recommendation No. 1 references a shed dormer as E opposed to the proposed gabled dormer as historically more accurate. This purported recommendation is entirely irrational since the existing structure has gabled dormers whose lines were substantially adopted in the Proposal for the new dormer. Thus, Recommendation No 1 is 5 irrational. (f) The Resolution in purported Recommendation No. 1 references a gabled dormer which would pierce the plane of the extension wall as historically,more accurate than the j proposed.This purported Recommendation is irrational and unsound in that such a s recommendation would result in an unacceptably elongated dormer,dissimilar to existing dormers. Significantly,HPC approved a gabled dormer similar to Vincent's proposed gabled dormer on the house immediately to the west.'Thus, Recommendation No. 1 is irrational. s E. CONCLUSION L k The entire process before the HPC from initial submission-ofthe Application to the Resolution was inconsistent with Code Article 170 both substantively and procedurally,thus prejudicing Vincent. After extensive impermissible delays,HPC denied the Application on bases which were never discussed, simply incorrect on the facts, and/or arbitrary and capricious. The entire process appears to have been driven by personal preferences of the HPC Committee members and the evident hostility of certain of the members and irrelevant comments from a few members of the community on the Project which was not based upon the Code or upon fact. Confirming the deficiencies in the process,HPC has failed to provide guidance as to 6 3a approvability of the Application. Under these circumstances the Resolution should be reversed, , the Application granted, and the Certificate of Appropriateness issued. 0 Dated: February 3,2021 Mattituck,New York WICKHAM,BRESGEASA,P.C. ru, By. Eric J.Bressler' Attorneys foriiic `xut 13015 Main Road,P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck,New York 11952 631-298-8353 zL zj To: William M. Duffy, Esq. Town Attorney for the Town of Southold 54375 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 a, s� =a 7 3 4 3 5 l~ % yy 1 L jf t"' ' "'1 j« � � ., ,.. ,- g x � f . �i t' .n — S i t z 3 f 4 4 L t k � F z f TOWN OF SOUTHOLD HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Instructions for "CERTIFICATEOF APPROPRIATENESS" Application { required for Building `Permit on Registered Landmarks ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED: f ® 1., Application: (1 page) ❑ 2. Notice of Disapproval: issued by the-Building Department, dated within sixty(60) days, z ® 3. Agent Authorization Letter: for Owner's consent when using a representative. , 4. Submission Materials: provide 3 copies of each of the following, to present the overall plan and details of the proposed project for review by the HPC Commission- ❑ 5. Building Checklist: to be completed with all applicable items marked} 6. Photos of building, surrounding area and adjacent buildings, labeled; 46, attached to copy paper. (Photo images imbeded on the drawings with Plans.) n 7. Property Survey and Site Plan: showing existing structures and proposed addition. ; 8. Drawi+lags' (3)sets of ©poseiord imp�'% B1ef►ts.� `"fa s'o1�,`to{itWte rr Flddff Plans (if applicable) of existih s r�ci tr aiad.p ci used ilii r !ments, t , E?...: p.QY Building Elevations of all sides affepted,uitkt=,buitlri =jr�igftt a_ rlf;exterior finish materials; include construction and ornamentation details; Outline Specifications: Window & Door Schedule, or references shown on drawings to include- manufacturer, exterior finish, style, types of sash lites & muntins, door i designs, profile, trim casing, notes & details. (Electronic PDF submission as requested.) f 9. Samples, supporting materials: may be requested. z All Submission Materials to be included with application. Failure to submit drawings and materials may result in delays in the approval process ; F It is;s#t 0gly�.sug ste tll t+#k eofp 1 ; pt revie*41% HPC Handbook and request a Pre,Apn :l re tibip#tin a foo,a ; PPlication. Y t -Meetings are on the third Tuesday of each month at.&'00-pm In.Town,Hall Annex Executive `Bflaid Room. All applications must have a represerliativ#,at;the:hearing in order to be reviewed, s Sections of local laws authorizing review by the Historic Preservation Commission of proposed work on designated town landmark properties are in Chapter 170 of the Southold Town Code. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPLICATION OWNERS NAME Vincent Bertault_.w _ D/'FE , 71151251 ADDRESS 5 Iitfre _ f } PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE 609-397-3635 iL d - PHONE - TAX MAP NO, 2'1tlt7b: 6�t}-1'- '2: :-DATE ACQUIRED .220.3 STATUS: LOCAL LANDMARK .- IN LANDMARK DISTRICT.X NATIONAL HISTORIC REGISTER PROPERTYZONE :R-4,0 fi EXISTING USE• t - e' y PROPOSED USE Sbftj;t;Family Resi�zic W,t accessory apartment.` s PROPOSED WORK: REPAIR - ADDITION , X. RENOVATION x,NEW WINDOWS. x• NEW DOORS._ REPLACE SIDING x REPLACE ROOFING NEW FENCE... x, NEW SIGN, ` APPROVALS REQUIRED: ZBA x TOWN TRUSTEES PLANNING BOARD SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE,,-_-_- - CHEDULE„_.__"i'iii`:}S 'desiha�itied-based approval process. I understand and agree that no work on this request shall commence until written approval has been given by the Building Department if a Building Permit is required. If no permit is required (such as replacing fagade materials or new fence), written approval must be received from the Historic Preservation Gommissl'ort. ... r7 OWNERS SIGNATURE ,� _ Btzijd!nLr Department Application. AUTHORIZATION (Where the Applicant is not the Owner) t Vincent Bertault a 95 Navy_Street -,g (Print property owner's name) (Mailing Address) do hereby authorize 10 ft,R. 0!C61460;AIA (Agent) to apply on my behalf to the Southold Building Department. 7/15/20 (Owner's Signature) (Date) Vincent Bertault (Print Owner's Name) • • �. '� �' aq. ,..,.-•'^"-'-'�.""�' �,�, x�a'-.��..n..� �.a"h 'kb"!i "�3�-�.•t4',�r, i"»"+z�:'�sy"^`4 , .x MIR x fi �•.c^9��'`�vj}ry�, 1{ b�1 a,��5�„•rt'?S"!«'�.��! i 7n �« w:.�. Ste' I t....•'� ,•�,ac�t'rs;��v ��+; r �p , ;.'�. f+� � "i dr, �`rr� r `Ht 6-4 q t le. ak.= � ,�y 'r aL.. S1t�*a'•-..`*•,�;erY�:. a:cs;+,.w..�'•�•tpr a �Y v'Y't+�/r�•tY r � f` r t. .•� �I{ !r-v.yi 77i".. � ^.i iS�+ r����_ "y.,F.. `...!'ttcx�c :�'�r�n.�a-+e �(�} .,'f 'r'ir B� A(]^ tM1tE Z'•ti...,H. t�.`..ta.{?,� 2- _ r.;r� r >I:�`;i .�iT' :, •;,Y+ "?:�r ,,.s,:w ."',;,.,; .Sa.a,. r .v'=`-aw,a:: ..�.}.a#s'. � r«. Rr�% n � �.. c _17�+, i �t•, r�� ^r �� x •.t� :.,w,.�, 4 a'f.x✓s 1�T«. �°al. .�...".m�....^. _ r.• _t�,.r. -��:cwu fir.. ,:,�,,' ry�. �� r,3„ q '.?qf : ., �� ,^t, rs'�;;n ;�r"�' .4'�`:^��'t- X.ah"`-"�,.f ..-.-w'. x.��."_;,rz m_ «...e-:lr•r•^i•t �ry4+ •.i�^j: Y i�•i ifs �}, Ny� i � y �,•t�� Jp'�v!r.'•¢�'.'::s.s.. M)R..:t,�,.,3'y �;yJ'., -F_ { �t�•� � Tti r'"J- R •%� ('•__-•• ....r^J,t.Zlitr'1,��a�+�z, � j ��:7• •�. R `�.� `t �d=�..rr� „•('3x�'+ r:y�� 1.�_..- 'Y'�',��:% Ulu y `:.rfi �}t btu �e 'SS,r wl :�{SL 5•r ?..., ,� !#{ r.a .•.'9, .{*�'7�.. -.. •_:' .-•t,.-. A .r :'fit �; _ [C.'1' `j €{ �t' � 3 ° •�:5 •T. R r ss ! t.,".. ����''°rt �2.1:RBONN'� � � ✓ .,,,�'� f '.� ...�•'Y ••�V ;� ��{ "x [. f"„ _ ` :r r pp III .«:•YF i tij-I I a.• »,.. _._ ,;" «t. ..:rz r.. ..'FI,I rp' r� "•J f F.:. .t, . s• ,I.. ,,,..,= rr r.m. �. �E, xw f 3.{ € ,. •t •rte. -m All? c S" r Y t ` a s•y- s.. it{�l�S�f�7�tl����F!" r2 4 ',s w^.'•`,.e.:.ti-a> �.—=_Y' -€!3 .�.tdr€. �<'r" Qc rr# .C�. k.° `ia e .^ f'r't.Z-t •3 § p �-. {,�:►4 a^�{ .�. .rf�y t:' ..._{ %' w ��..,sr. t••::;r.!+�.•.�►"`-,-.. r.; Ft'}-,i b� ..1 `z ?'r, ."z' � •=.:.ate- .:1:. t .•��Sr 1 :�5�, wxr,?9�J .Kv}T.r�^. ,'.;,�.,fi:;;...< :a:r,• "rti.i�:Ft.•,- t��sy.'y.y ^;5 c}ttP"y.:�'•`... •,Wit*:^.;t�Pt�. L..:.^,� � .�,•`. r't`+�"•• nr`- t }'i ..-- t ,;yx"��C-:!�7°,{_��r,.�L7g � +,6 .tom.. �`Zr zx-;• «.!'•,',:,; .z-=c--^"�:��Tt`•� .:.?..,,.,::� - .}:I' r°;w:s.r� ,f.• R'•":;f., �rr -:F. --^^'�,�,=••s�:';. ys i"'•!4- ��i�r 1``'•�'' 2�'n 3�r ,;�j,�' -Iy 's`' rnX_rs.-r-•Y t�r���}�}�.�TS-•.'�°•v,�.�,w•„ r..: r-c-. s,,;,�, ;s- ��,,, �'�.,�w ^�`�rT�t�A'' .•�.r'�+w.y� �• J„?%«�a,�-`;c ��,` =ay'• f. '� h �"}. w� ...*�` � "5� sw� �G�`T''"` ''`'�r'°' a'�, r��' t �, y -.-y. .�- -�.-a•.+.rs�•i,,.ti;;ir t.r:e! � ...r ':,"'7•.. -.� r epq k-;aal._.r -a c,...: .r' +'Y.^„`^j•..'"atv'e-,`S �'"-a4• "° �,�;' ¢ r:x•�•'. ,,a 'Et.?".-^.2• s a.�.•.;.m...=*'r _� .:,•:' �t, '..1. •..�•�,,.`Y.' '''�L. -,-:cc-f�'r�`'•;+'.`��^,tt��'�'SL��'w€'v��+=z w� '�,� ,x .r•r^..,•_ .+`° "�'!i°'^". si .'•uw.- ,." �tl`?k��'•:.3�.Y`t"ara�•t".�:,T:xia-"•a ..,c, .-+ z!''r�yiy"�°a .y+ 'r ^,:...`a.,��. S Gl, y„ r .'w"yt ,.c+.•".^'S ,x4 •- ; t.....R^n z. as z <.. �s•Y,:..,s�.. ,',per,.?.:�'.5..: - `•'^t .;`, `, r-.::.i;Y''��+ '`-�as'*• tirY:��� ri.'*,:..^..a„•.,+.7•. a .4z 'lyr,... 1i`'.�� •u^�"✓,tir•a.- y�, t•.-:' �is s--;i: te,h,rr�l''`'";i�. .0'^+ k' F,4 ` s -"= < _ C•'Y,iSh-...rte _f a-„m•! '�r'`',•,N .h r..ez. t 'tL .,1• ,,,.,t. .++�~7���m�-`�3' � r -e°+,�K .a• `.:. `"»^� s;-�. :.:n> mac.,:•� �`•�' .,iS,;.,.�c:�3 r`F Y,:._1,.�,�„_,,�.^;...1 x�� *+•r,wa?�.::5�ru.e u '�^.:'w•,<'' ...�...-k '�-.-,., vR'-•„sem t«.��.aa• .-^v t xv, x a,<z h'a''��wc :?�3,..+, -..o��,�+.='`. .,�,t�f�,....,c'r''''`-tc..�."'�'-t `F�'n:�..y -'-;� .^r--rr' e'Z-t�„ti'7., ! a .,.�•yl •a' 9.`,«*»` ^ r S tt.: `g` "j.+ . 1..,,.,,. ,. -.--F ...�i.5;.�. ''Ye',:,^ -^y E a,- _c,t 1' •,!'s.. -C d•.y� .�"�`'���'.�°�?2#14:34-��i'�4,�'r•'X'zi�:•,....�'',�” � -�?` "�X:� ;0n,'�';,�-�� €.��v.�'•„�,:�;;'� .",:•-"., �• 3� -'4:.1`w _,:_--r- '•.s=stn^;•w a. •t" �:: ,�?'S,.<, .,.,,;�"�'K+",� •.r. .�, '�,`..:?,,�y''''��-i�'=c•�.rk�:sty"�yri _�� ;•}�.r -'-r;'.,.,Y+--•• -a. -`$ a-Y$� ""���r!!.y��y„�,�.,-c ..t<'^,j a r3Y N;:: •,+ =Ls- .'�Y�"�" W-1, y ,,•t y".qg`• ` is y _ ..a--•4:5• e...:.v•'s•"rx-f3. c' .'•=`e'.-�.s}' .;=..v^:... •, A i•tF R� ri�•z rer GARY R.O'CONNOR RCH SURVEY OF PROPERTY OCORYELLSTREEr AT ORIMM TOWN OF SO=OLD SUFFOLK'COUNTY, N.Y r r r r ip 50' Zr~ xr R,.•u . WIT .ea. .•air i • Ml o #w- ;MQ .te„ } r c ' `iik�•Jy k. MAIr Jamw T. MlAft O • • r• r :€ A Mi #. q srs.�e � x „• � n -; ti L aK,• �w azti.. .t • 5 Y # �c ;.,. i ii •x ai tl ?*• tea 4 .. ., EL, a is L 5 , C 0 `+i"`pe�.t,�. �+'f7. q Q..t Z �� :af.�•�`1 s•r as c� STREET NAVY tit a` �� ��+• ,.a-�.-•^ will WAcm_ . 4' Tr4L'� .a a.a... •� k a }3i k i 'I- j1 i Cjpp2y p. �� }( old �w ARC V94 SAO Aw at a�3�' �.`.rs�`�4}t�Si?R•�� ,yH �W {,' i�"'-'y,� aid ?•y.Y wa 1. ..XP"x.�+�-3 i-:,•�.G�+a'•tiau„�,r:fs�k"•""�;5r�n?.;?�..a..�at!dt.�'�3..?.is Y .M-<5•' F ,moi GARY R.O'CONNOR scommsTrIm au .19 r° <rKki aw ,�[[�s'sw�.� }. # q°.,z*�^s`"raA�k" p,•. s .a, r, 's r a "� ^`vr .�e�e s.' : I � �y°es^�..�.�a�I".+3�a`" '•.'t.,� -`�"' `'�•'�„�.'+t"^r„n�.� � 4�'wca � 's�"'^•�"'^' ��4 _ ..._ " �^�r, f'` `'"� w'�r�l�✓�,:�«v�i;^�?'�'s'��s�ar.,, fg,��.,„ '�s:� � � r � ' : e,—.v .sgra <+ a«' F �,,"`"'�`",�`�4.yr�1?".�y T3/'"+",�-2�T�Y t4"•t.' ',•-�i�"«;,.Gti:..xi+..,i<.'rf�...�i� t,..a:�` �. :-t.-..a.Pr�a a''a+.a�;�u.`,',r. II �1 F' fi T �'�+• _ s^ 3. 4 ..a.r% i✓ x•J 'L y#K Jar ,.1•fr,•d <�." t # ..�! � � r�f � s ST IZ,RI "*sae=. G==-g�3 aT,... • a+"'$ ».%��,.-. .n ti,». 2 � : r a $.�'x'�,�, G ht�'"•'s t xsvg n ,.FT ti 'k✓e's .:.��.,..,>v-_t a ,hu 4 yna,�. /'.�'�asc�- t n 't�fr r >�i�= � v �-rf�^"''•pmt tP„ � s,�..� �., ""L�xt.s�, ,,y:a*�' � �,,,,� +t n»::a �1�+,,, ,t�wux,,,. } 1 t'� r. t,� a''"^. "''� rr.� �.. ,�: • ,»"�/� r:?=�.��,���s"A.xfy,y�rM`# $° ,� r•�t✓,;�.��.tga„�^�s.az^''t��%""'�.3�*.�x...'�"a.�,.•�a'�7�'�ar '^'. }e.ry '�SYhI,�'r q yT'1 � L'Y« a t x�,.LL. '"^��, C a�? 5�3'C .bv^ A8�'T'N+., ry✓' :__�� Ya gt., #�tw}f+� z�Y x�,�,,y{. M"..TF«: �xY{Y..:: .y �S/+.r..v'Y.^•:2_.Y'aO�".Sj�"Y` ..C36R'•,:f,�f � • � aT.Sc b '+�` � 7a ��ti"�Trf�i r'T7� I �f`r� t �_ °+�+� �.a..�.x t • �+r�d 1'tn +•'4i�1,1 �rl�4`y/i� t # � ��g `C"' QY�R�1� 15-_....11�",q� i1y" ,c*�a• <w'o 1 t rf�,F�.e�•#r �r'� P�. -.w.. 9( r a'r WA Mi G��.�►_' ri�� `y'y\ A\ti 4l1 1 u �, J_, ^.. ... *" '6:.. �3{f §s, �: C�b1l61�� mgi �y ��'" t "��, T f � T �•Y-Q�� �eiw a f^v'k+aF 'M S 3' j„i <� '� �.� �'rt^�-.',-' - F GTS 1 vim#q• �-�.a• �°"'. ) a,+'�v. �tpyjds�1 - - p� 'GARY R.O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,M jn71.� �.�,�_'` €t * g �y;'r� dy,��*��1.''?�0����jjy...,,,���4�ss§�'..'����`yl�•` ® tel �r JrA ash` �r�+y� t t�' a�.�x. � +�+h �• '�' aa�4y, - �'� .:r. ✓:a �„�5}i s� ^.��, a-«i Z >5;-'i+i" nao-«�.. "r. �• �*+a', • i iia" v tem �, �. k newwiw�•ww® � .� , '.� � •,, r r.�ww�weesa a� ' r r. � 7 '•r -- � v�Y tut' h. u„ s.. q� Y W �I IIIAAA WAIew 'fin +''•sa h F r }'. 'hrt !� ?,% "„� ✓ ,� S e �,� ste a �� n �. � 4�{ ,� ,p ,' �$ ,�I•,4b1{"SIf�.�ti#[i •�sGi ti 50 ''K r '4;fit ^4 p r ±-:�� �. { ,,,;,•�.. s :i Yr` ,&" c� za '(,� Wit:"•. "'�t a'"..�tx� .. ! �.��'.a'.'a,.R ''^`r"`"�'z�''' '^`� ,� `�""'� "a � ...--'-- z _x ..I' I' 2-•'t:_•a6 '. tW g i •'i ,� t� '�k:..m.'� �,t°3"' °^� �,s �mC�. � r" �.'"'�ix �'"''T wi�•F? ,�' 3, ��a,'�x� ,x. ,.l� yr a �'t +� #�" .r.+• ;z, Qa..'.'� f: �.° ..�"."'°'"�"d '��-� r.'ka 33 j.��,t;Y��' i�va}�b". s KK.sl� � s�'' zFw- ,�,e §i, ill i~� ai,_ :.�S, '';.'`F, yt .h�„°^^gw°7'1 i{�",as :.{; €x""'u �, `,"`°^r,,,�° ,,,.-„,:., t� ..,f ^y"ww"6 c,. :>4.ai„x �.,•"`"g = ' y, a .^'z'' .--^_`-�,"'c�+�.: 4s ;vim w��. 3'x..1., � ��fr ":�, y - �'�'Rs a�"•2 �:�t�r.T.��a,,.ui.cis:���„:� r�. ��"-:. -+�"yy.N ”�,p.,^5s-<-r, sn x r ti - p..%,w � R � 'ham ^•�2 C'«=`��`-t��'y s... ��-.�-.-.. s iit"i°�Y f , '*✓ N �xs.�... .-_2,�sq'. - 4• �' a.nws.�.�?"m, ,a...+a, �...>:af".,;� u . +,_ .._.y-• "'�•. ,4f. ,:« �*• GARY R.O'CONNOR ARCHITECT.AIA g 8 SCORM STRW muam8m. IAIMMME wcam aForaEme�r�ms WALLLEGENO '" Y �1 OOS(MFNL10 fQLLW tl� zO H 0 Z y r 5` - - waasmicanailomwu�n i •, �.mrtlarwl �� s�ruvrsrtesl,oepl,rWma�.m � I 41, PilOP65m OWII1NGMH5 yr � H A-6 PROPOSED FPM FLOOR PLAN lwc�r.ra PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR!ROOF PLAN sxr�r.rr r— GARYR.�6• O• C>� "`"`!'+^^�►�'Y�����•®�R—rR.ii!!))'p} � fi 'l"-f,X•a�'r.. t '`,7� .� i�"x r� ARCHUECT,AK SCORVMLSTREEr w, s� •> .. yrs + mSPECIFICATION OUTLIN a`,sfsh`+�� _ ;��?''��^''��`` '_ ^�. t Pal dr^anq cr rjo poll j:.L� I.L ., Ell *< J rt G r��•,k s a tti" ..rhy"+.�,?'tt F3t`''z'eA 4 w,. i4'ff �P^. tt ,,.tt:� ,fit.:-��:��7;,� a : sr cr$h:r�?•., .a+,. '� w,,..,;...,�, `�3, � :rr�#�>Z� � zc _ � 1 "T g� ��S y��� s ��'mac"" '•�°�csi L����'i��;`cs�X X,.y � q. � .��� ilim� ,• x . 5,� ,{ ......dt � � r l�i.���i6 7 Y,s..,�-,v". c � r &XF, �3 i :tea ✓* r�y �^r� `�''wX ..xs4 w, t,,-tti,,��,`_""^" r'r�-;x, �- � ,�+s+ (f Ls x �,_. i t._. �,..+ n3Y 4 -•L /.-x �T 1 t rFj} `L.:� � `r P �� .s-.r 1�+-.0 ..T'Y ,�•'r-�..f `�.—_��a� � .. ,. .... ... i 's3.x.s x ,.,.��,£``++�aa� � � w+'sL .� ,�,.pn•,•._..-.--^^_.'r�-r .: 2 S, tM`v,k cs^iv`�:,.�'b.+• yr�,k �S}`u.�"r-aY y,.+"`x:�� tom.. Tr° <�"� . ni,.+ a�,2�,,wx:...Jm�°.�°" :+b 3"r�t�.s� v���"Fhk, .,t,F&+u,,r.RM''" �'n•t�d 3,.4'}i F,} .- _ GARY R.O'CONNOR ARCHRECT,AIA d CORML STREET Nf uc mmei i LAMIERNUE NJ osx s OWO SPECIFICATION OUTLINE roa a emr..o nooc m.r 0 ti£AfpSDC FE�RfsIT___—"_______-- CEM SMWES CEDARCEDAR SHINGIES i '.�.' fJPO5ED E LPCCO TON 3400T115T000O�NEUfPAL EARTH TONE COLOR TBO•I� riLMmmSRS 15, f}f} WACEX00 SERIES WISDLI✓1MIW EARS W! EAACFR B �u VI IcneTz ` Y BufE STONE ORSNM1ARNATURALSfONE T -I;gpB:i hit �I' p rk°,'",. ry«.. �` r,§� ^�, P�;, ,,,.p v'EM+ "' •* ""'�,�;=-"..x, j'j �;"3-'*�a •' Fa�»' •`? �;'`'F `�,§ � "s�'"'� 3 4" ��� �n��a + �;`� a� °n"�'� a :�` -';�; � r*�r.�ate=^... ��.� 5• 4 ,�� f— ,�tS a✓,? .uiE`t-s r'.'y g _`'•`"�.'..'",T_7'sw„�k a�%«i '�S` !t�,, ra• t ry.;' y y r�+� .x. iS�., £ ''°is .;'� (A �: 4�7a'wF`°ra .+�' �V�p��,C``��w °'n. s'd,�»'"'-rr"8 x, � i'; •x T+6 k ' & S, ',�za,^k" ^R"''�.n,.`^s, s Z O U O LL- 1 EASTELEvATION.-.ro ~O Z fi 1 I �t q OW h Filr 4K t r _ - , - lERRt4EnrtA0Eta/•t1` 1 Via:nc '� ���. .d°q�-���:{ ;a r t�"�ai�'"s'..r:�' °�m �. �°�-'"'�:�`��yl' ,"x.S,. ',�'� ,��P ��'{l��au�.,���a"�t��*�•w,�rr. �` 4,� kriz++.B . � i c �.`�,d"x Mr;'a.4` �' ,.f.""�'z`s"rv,A 4 ti ,� w3 "� ,M'st"'• ta. "���,' � �, a' •1�" -��'`'��"��"�'��` �.y �w maamuariwmoxfluc �'.T S —� "`,� `:,ua •: . +;zx °�+,"`�`^_ ,:r,:�r.+".,',� "''°aka,;«, ,, ; T,: '°�s. ' €" �"��x �'�^ p�,.��°,",,'�* r�, � #-;.M:^�.,�[m � � � as ��r �i�„. �'." � s E•"+��� r� " rw� '§ t',i�.L�?�.; '„x ?;` ,` ii.. �s ,#"a•��.«';",�'�"'�...> ."�",4t"sup '�_. k« cy ,� �' � t�= '�:,r•o" #,'�g�, .� t .enrw.nmr�morA.e.mr,eirm � OW4llNG F1LYATWl6 F n •DE,— yw.a.r A_g xa 2 NORTH ELEVATIONiw..e _ — ""mffi_ GARY R.O'CONNOR ARCHITECT,AIA a ACORYEUSTREEF xrtt,mmtl - LANBFJOYGlE.lu o6flo O,�v FtgAE ras�v»ms TOOOf ^� !aS SPECIFICATION OUTLINE m — — — — — — — — — — — — — — aOL �wsuxra c� Cava SK"GM re ra ra SLOOiHS71X[A,NEIRR11FM7x l01ELOLOR iHO. r> .•� a � umensex _ aOp, S`,?Y!SL1:kFYR16iALri! `�f ?(• Nyl ,��, �Y '� ' 1YdIlOY6CL &LES70NEORSIY6IA NATIIULSIONF Y Fig eppn =eF�;I:Zf°'*. `3�„R"f'.: ...w.Y.. °a%' ' a ',a:: +,� ,„ � .' ,"'" „ ..•,}„>`"' ;a yr.'s ° dY �'J "`,5• ' : '«'~ 'qr,?".a' .,. <' U g '"F.`: ,} F— Fs U) Z O U � E = O) 3 i rm oc r arw aox nr r ��ttaar>RJonrti7Y—_—_—.—_—_—_—__ I FT ' nvr �md+m° `0 wzro�rgr--------•.....�..� + . t � .J� � �-..a-°..�'{..—� ".+.. .'ram= �o-(fSFa rorb�:i- ---�,.. _ > :�•'��'"'',X�°. y`��^,�`> ".�'�` „�t",✓ ,:'.""S,� ? ""„ A%'i,",: �r`��}'�' " �:i�""_:� t'i`"'�`s'�+ y.�,`-�,a.'•.�f"":�•�7�5�°� +�` �P "'`� ��^7�°�,'�.�`.r��;� "�},� "���°<=�5� vacoa•.m�mnwroo„eune x��'"���°�',. .�&'ca ;>,;£`f�f��:<`�'`.•�."n'� :a^&�'�j'�: ��.. $�9 P'�'�'A°�r_ � � '�^� # B±'"�w� zt..,� ,,�p `9",�< r�, v'z,.,. S, r,�7F-v ;.�'��,�.,.�,�.�.„�.�� ��x� ---` � ' n w IUll ILEVIT as a3'1"•' Ek `''�����.9�a�=�f�'� e -.�_�� %� y.�k#,� 5r ���",f� °� � ,i a�is�^.3£' c> §� �. ''°� � "'�y��Yi':� "��'<.� ��,re� , n + '+ A-9 _ __ 4 SOUTH ELEVATIONr; dmYk O,CO,NNOR t: EASTING rr ■.:9r �i re rr rr ger rw wwwrr • • • • I w are• ®1 •O•PLAN EXISTING SECOND •••PLAN � ��P}� � ��t."Ti•+ k a*,, s' '�r%y ---. � rt_ � � Y>' ��. .r' �+ sic. •:4�illlw . ��'-��i e'1'. �•���i,i ;�l'f 1���. T h.='. �'+/h''* �* y�, i�\•�rffi.'ttst g' .r ,f.y...rd ti, e. v i > ,r.± "..w ;\� .• � '.tie I � r si \�1► � Y � y,. �'_:�' y 4 -.:�� tl ••„o ^..� � n� �•ax',�`,. k�,., i`� ,��x..�.° lir i���.�.`M%��}'2;�-Z.a- w r� \•..., 3A L' � •�I.f" (� <s} # Vie, r sl .. ,�; ,u �� ^" I V '11! n� ski k L,t X'G tt--ss5 ' j/etv -., j ..a"M':. sw ice. ...ram;,�" •°' ,t� -,i ' sYt E �. 4"11. ri::' a..`k�"." ^^?^,�.�. .,i �, ^sy::-�,.,s'�3:s.'�.S,.,,-^` ..,'^ ia ..c�+�•;-.-�`^'.> {u. .,a.a Ffi u�" -.,� �s- "`:- Y z4 •`'^.A'"..n'` "" ;'�.. t` -.i'i"c-r�`�f =iG• ,� c. � i^v.. y-'N" . . +'y. a. ,„•,,� - "^'7.-r r GARY R.O'CONNOR ARCHrrEer,AIA � eCGNYF715Rb£T •'Ytti/�Cyii� f � RIOIQB2]�l]6S :�r tr - 0 �{ fn •- eae ( z O —•---•*------5 g f 0 • f tea . tel, • 4� [! ( j _ _ w AfV6d6 - ' ik� �! [ +• •ii r s 't MP4w�m�aMA - -— — ma�nwafurteama r � vr� gWlff oN _ PROPOSEDFIRSTFLOORPLAN.6m—ra_ _ PROPOSED SECOND - `"��— ARCHfMCT.Alk R.• • •- a° *� c„g 4 `^^gg 4 JI e �s ,xj$a' wit an "d Itt¢ d x FK". I•`vF �(I� WILLow EL4. N851 8130-E STREET OM,,,�{ x" . • `,p��j� (�� '� +� + 4a'!+�E tis`a, .r� • ci 53, U2 NN nwn �R ���� _ `'�YY�. t F(Y7Sr.�` 'G `�"� ��,„��..'5�.�,gkfF*veOz,..��.w�Y`4�„✓^,y.',�. r ,. azyu?.a yse r >w,; .-• .?r.,a'._� a ,.d'S' >c-s ,,t�'z`+1�3 v..x-a'� Te r SSP x s: m �� j rel, o#ter it=xpa� � �� �uf Q1M�i/� Y ' M��� ' ::' j i i 1 .04 .ra-. ..-z -,z .-r.-ane�.•m .. xi_.wo-v-„aa-v-v.>aa�x- a w � ,�r x1� 4 'GARY R.O'CONNOR ' ARCHR•ECT,AW i Sc YUSrRUTT umr.+n UAMTV61ER7OSAO SPECIFICATION 0UTLINE ------------------------- YFRIIULCF➢MBOAROS r Fnouo Famm�ndr SYOOlMM=U.M"AEEM NMHEOOEORM WDERSMQ0 SERIES cAAssOBAVP= • AVEr>s i� g i• '- ( rZ �.nasurnmw--_._...__.::.,.:a- ,rte,.»• '',".�"':^.�C., .��,w', 'i6.;y"'" n'' w4�"h'" y�' ;•a } �`"�I » 'R a ' s ! �}} fi NO. e a. , .� i "7,! �.;. .' AI„,+1,,.' "� x- �" $5`�R;S„ i .: i. ' '+� G .°. , F" " S�" ,r "1.�' a,„; ' .,• `*s` ^f �' '` + re"3 �' � + U i,O LL. 1 NORTH ELEVATIONrlu d.re 2 YVEST ELEVATION roc r.x _ _ __ __ _ _ loi ---------------------------- f _ - I rn, ra gra � �-•,- - _ d M,"A*^zk^� ^?@,�:, ,aa `✓`` '., "7c: :• ;»t'c.`'f°-'� =9ss .G,�ciB F .','2 - _ .�..�..�..�..— ' _ s, .•:••pap,G1gi11pd 3 gyn�{y�_ i. x .jI --PR�I6L7�1nV- I m^�R��R�b%O�eIDlq �, m r, � ` " .�rz."P d( �" `~ t� �flri�flt7Rf ops>P�tYr�.m ' ti x ^y ^a.s�ct ���sa "�� woroamauwutEa�rcw �4 .� Kik 'g �i '¢°N RiA e n 3 _ MNMkRUCGgIp.KM1CtaVb EXfEAgR E1FYARQVS art ✓^x” Lp..an T SOUTH ELEVAT10N4 EASTELEVATIONsduw•.a v, —, HISTQRICIMAGES PERINCHEF COTTAGE 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT NY ° ,u,'lti-re .. ` `„� r'.p'�, m''"'.,4"P*x",t".•_^.` ,k „ i s �`^2�.:;=�:..<'� µ>..a; �°'�""''fifi�,.,'„��.T�Ca” �' �; "���°` ,�, ",,,,.� »" a .� ,u_s"�af...od �\j ,r t �R�"• :fid ';-„ '�' ,.a^, z.,,..ae,,3�*'` st `sa”%t;,;. a °k t .•' .r .,._ r ;a _ � =�;: �''"'m�::�'`:_-'-''p�,>.�, „tr< �;=aw, )"", f�^, ?•:�`,�'���ra'' - of lege Pc a: ,#,M ;_„;•_ `i� ,,oma^ "';=�'?a?•" �'< s ..x°�„ ;€M,�<`,,, gid. •� ^,a r1 C. A.` rineLcl;^.�., ,w, »,<,,r, 8a �p?>,��,"y,r� -N `X;� Y" .,.'�.� •� �a %.*Y ar�'y'�W� .� , "^ s �, ! .,�, Ngo- •« a '"�.�✓"^ .t^'.".�� ;�,;.tee°%�`> �°"` (,.Ai �,`Pi;="'�,�,. ` i ;«;Asa- sF« ch e£',�':i ."_.-'� _ "s.• > M" n- +za-v,�."„s <” "��,'irF�'' .�-a. `; R`I£d ,. y ate. .ya�-ay ..s '• , `�i, „`;<' � s°X:�«�; �s�, �„;�a��g ,..,� ,!�'�`kik..a��>ti ..�y�.»��Sry �... '�' •� A'�s a�{ $;� Me, d *,I�. a: °,,,,1,,,;,,a+ ri',�'`s,o {�y y."cf." P yS 'k..'^• haw � �„ '� R 't . �#>„ e' �'rtA4 rs�n3�° �=4.�� ham•-.,�a"�,�T2�t�.,�',<i� ;'. -a� ':i;S `"� " �ti°&., ,rc -` ��xyy;�,,��,�,'�s2&,+ �a� �,..�i �� d f ,`>� KQ�,#:r:. � � � 'r'�,�,€. ,�,I;.7r�+�'£�`r"• "€ •°�,?"�." 3n`;zr ,v',&i^*�a.`^ 'i;,.�"t �--r<a `` t'"^ �� a wia' �" ."; -•,`;� n `�;�aa"�" x.� .tk" t"��'�,r°sr�"` °' �s �;°.`•4 �,�', •:.F'�.x���," �<� �� w xsMQ5, iQHt ,t;�'-`w ��a a4."e.''t•_'y ,i •�" «a "•'s;.»�V° d:°Ws«,�Sr„�� � i£,`�«Ia'..xe�' �x au�#°pp Via, 1,�a'',`^fij5,, CCi�wlir "", �3 vA s JIM `x -~ "$ te + :'' `k d w1"64 :7",a A'fti>- ,._'�'4.�C'_f"� xr �wiu��..1'S+iSe%s�t='9.S'sE .n`e4Y..ae�7X nm�{U'u �i..M� F*s�re > WILLOW STREET GARY R.O'CONNOR .EL4.7 N85`28.30'E 65,93' EL52 MCHRECT,AIA .r N ICMYMsrRW wteozaa tR :' !t• a '^ZONING COMPUTATIONS i* zraowmmafP EMM ECM Mm .,'a ;rr acNr.aa •trPr. ,art. 'foaw � N tK10fR3;M Inn, aln `pgiyCf Z-o i �, h ., iaiiedi>.Prcr>tvoeuuJnuas .�._ EtEYSRf;` vne (tsimrr O K iC[MQ110.Ct+rt• �' 41T m: n V rclfor�enaa�oxw •ry$5'pp! ,. ei5ha`t�a6it Inu w r,.ic renoo 54,53' w�wr.le.rn wst>awvMw" nfv mm"em lufr •7 '{ w�DlOw r1_1,•:1 OCfTK3iLp' mis ' tflp({[CNLeeA '"1'yi {', I•.•• I�'S7jp101(00f110� Inif 1 i vro _ rW�N3D�+NY✓r mfr P`1 e ' Nv[r'aalp.; IsA�.4 1} -tow. , X l &' I,r,'1 -_„ -- t5+raura:3r.'oi• urlss unar talu roxn '� � ','��� 1f �:•-�: .'� EXISTING BARN ELEVATION WlPROP,OSEDFENCE !If IIA T FR GAR ( t, �'•s O SLAT V fT;$�PClr,,`WEAT}iER NATURALLY. O LL- 00 rr °f+cw`,'�'9ncns`cs"wu%' � f rxmrw _ QQ (, i , ;- All i r A�,f�II[991 �M I ,M 6,r'�•.�( �. 1 faT uw a o- �1/`i fYt Y� `�� fMOC°YwVNi�r MP%aMf MW�I f [Baano - ♦ ^ l'.�.•tfl.r• �~~'Il q�,,-� - ��' fYKA1ECAFLpG/DDTOMfNRMid" �' ► ! i PROP=ML6RE li..F. sez°as'ao-ni Ti 's!'NAVY ST _ PROPOSED FULL SITE PLAN fwcr.ae `._ FENCEMA11ONDETAIL r.cr.o W— GARY R.• • OR S`�` � ,.�...-,.=.-r°"° r• r _r+v --'ter v,. t ;,c.•ra,"'f I � z 4� 1,p�` e� _,-«?�...Y`. ?,:c ..�r. t-ri.''� "'. - x 7'tw" 1_'<;,t«�. ...a..esr tisg''"S :.L;� fi. Is�sN f ,�` k r' >.� '"Y.3-tL"�j,�`'^ e ?, a 3,* 4 ,'Y:.g 4: p�3==Yti.'*:;s s'Y.���' -L i.���^•< ,.;:r,.-�j"U}.:,-' iee:..�.•m.. :.,.nb+r � �...s __ ..�.., X, ,�•�aw-�. a,r,".y.;��;.r,'a..�{.�.r,*�;,�•.s....+...,..;xc5.M�'a"rr¢.�s.Fe.�^t.'.ff.„µ,.r„„.�m�.;-c.,-y v,�„x.�at:d��t.�_,:•.,.,'.s.?..-:.:,.,r.::<;..s.�..„a,�.',,M-..��,.«.:'���'��,.,.",.,ea52.t.,.. 4Ers:..'.�}.-^F...."E>.">�-'�d;,:"+t:ar^r�x'.�s.m�.;r,rarr<r�-r✓�,^.,":-.2..•"�f s-..�a��,•�.,a�•«..�+�<t”.,skr�,sis .4F•az�s*.,s::::,,�.r.;a.....,.,,*.„.. X�..:,y•+,�.y*�_,�:.:".��.,...s.�e�4-�'��_^Ys'...:�.z;-.a;e-•.'.0x',3 s...��.fi:r,?,^"���3'ax>�,.�.r,r:x...�.�'.,'.a,�..41I .1 a,t�r..;.:;-..1,++>.,'��xt1�.�t'rx,.«Yt,.>:•,L.X,3,".e'�,�•'�•.��:,a�c•�;.r-^z"�,.,:';'�,.,,-�°�-'ss'�x irKr.-.:.n..^w"aHX^..#s'1"asa u�#y�"„�'.s�.'�,n.'a.wN,*':;d”. x,�:r�✓?y. ; ;Nn.» e t�.�';;�.'�� "�:^:,�,+ ��""�r;�"?�r_�:��e ,»..•�:! • • tea ' par --- x�'.c'tilk pyx i a _.r.,r s� r� � 4rr '• v Y "`'/ 't I � "T ty+'''�, S y# 4�?, �!F,��''"- "?�i ;'moi, d�<;:' i"a, '�r~^�`< :,",• z er§�"^,x;; ;��`Ft,R. ,r : � r`• n x"•. „w,w,•t*^ - r �. :` ",r+s€" ;a� .� 4l" y'^. • ' �` ... r '� -•-.�- 'rr,,:.0 '. ,. �.+ r ^`c< k sr; v^"' ,&...:,rt.� y* ak� 1E r'G`f` '" T r :n• rry" "q yg �c [ 's. �.A ' e '� tai. �'; "".��w � s , -�°� ,? � ,• '�C ",,�rt €�;,�, " � �n ,� ty,,�,� n a ?<Fi� aw � C^C '�i's"`` /r�°�_�..�.�'"' �L ,�".- c�i 5.�.,��. g t..-sk� v.`�"`''�.�is_`-a�7; �'� ,�� E � x,.�',�`�y a`� r 'b ��gr'ri�„r•t`e'*'�; �. r ---- 3.td^i,ar.�'-'' x �i*4`. ,;R;-:1'�; 13•. °'�' � xt�.x" .�'rs � .,� �.'^$ t �'--;:p �.�R` r"'�, �• #^�*t at_...,..x � t. k � �`« is± � �.•a. ��. ,�+'� �f€' "+: Y :� '.�y"ix 4� X t5.6s1t 3 %+`d �t'i?i' :i F „'h.�es e9= P". r� iu'x't~ 'yt x+q z`;i•�,`r 4� L` .:15"1 ; °?Y': '- � ..*w. �.+ '"� w. t•. � �f� tl4 1t�. E!il��a.ti� 4 I..a3 WLY' x .i ✓t c;y'`a .a_ ` ` »,t't' a "» .; ..a-• w -t gra `.f+ t`75`'�t i e: t < � .•,p '� r r+�"Fa°*� °'4 .,.�, �� yam'"". iS q�*� .,••w; �L ar'..c.�.;� a r 7 i`y��'...w+'t� lye::# '".,ss •� ��,'. v •� � Y�.r11 1t 11S a x ar xi G+ �3s »�e« �4 ^^ u, 3°�,..x ,:.✓� i �. t i• .^3. �,LS ,e="* "- '� � � 't e"Y' ....:• �x ^+.�qz^•i r •s �r» 5' +t- e Pzs<+ i�" � � �-� C;,^.G..s •sy'{.a ,n' ,� s',.„�.� �,.>' • A,xr ,y ,,, Ly. ,',` -KKz^`vy Cr1' ." *es sndrs.'4 y .-rte »*•a '" t,.. :'�". R `-"'.k� •,�'•�3...:ra HOUSE ON VINCENT&FLETCHER WITH WRAPAROUND PORCH • 17, ¢fie � � � E t> ,r,€a�.��.�s � ; , � 5r A q • ccs ' GA ��." �• '1•-v".waxxESs;�:'?N."�'i'G ,r°, f{. i.. .,m „a.<..: j r e7 a � *r .lf�. W '."�•"'y'� e["` •, rs'tr`.,s rxi`£. •'S`a,MY -.°'s ^* �-#?rs.�l•?A` �i' _..."' a-., Xdi .�....���. �,,.,.�}� N .., ,� • �.sr a.:.»r:•..'•-•••�. .. �"z»:' S§-i�°i 4 j� �4w_�iC:r.�t F'�n r� jrn ��a'k�� ✓ °T��' ,..����� ,��#r�.;�.�",r SSC>;a •.,,... § "7,r; Prn' �*�:.�t «.'t"��sg �� 5 e�w�,�r a �r NUS4 ��' ^«•w.t ,a� .,s,'•^r 'Ls.•« ..�°"$y -�.A-.a 'fir,.t� 1 S.S` tsJ �e. a .'� 't s^:✓. yea X,2'.s}.. . �r�vT �� 3xT�.'.'-e ,�k�`'d`.M "al���� •g� ,}.: �\ }kr .iY : �!A 2 a` }.✓p �'�11 f.yg$, x^J"'���",,gg'!�l � '""`a `?X:<. �,t h"&#,�a y; ""Sx�-c,�,A",r .a5�,-t� "yV y �•�t�is�f 3���,. 7� ,��� 3''•: w`� �:>~� .a,:�:,�r��-.�"a•;:3�"''" :;� t a,«� L jl 1''�'l'�""�r r%' L�d�i,' i i� '�'�. t HOUSE •• X X ••• • •• • •• .•X • 1•• • ®� Il /yuu a �►vaeA v v EXISTING FIR .• EXtSTING .. • . ►ai®�I y } C•'111�0[�11- S7�SsrS p�Q� s'=.! «z t. �-'T '�. s°✓ -.,a„ r+' '.� a ,. ; s �'' ;• q �.� '" t .,.�` - .. 'x }1 i M k,•' 5 � Bald f. ,. w• A � ,'�1. I'. ��' s �-';z'�"5"..:."" � �� i c''`v�� j .,c<. it xx�� ;_ � t ,r{�•te;.. r S.:cz �i �€tIF'n€!€€ r l'l i �€s ,5,. (�2 ��- :- s��i a€ a:� };fig ,7< .��- ;*•�t�^,x��' x x,. -� % b " --.'�;.:,,�,�� .sr*�>�o�. s �,.�r"r�!� err c�sa�^" Kf°��: a;'�?,� ",# s.;'"�' z s;•1�'ks` �"k �£�s ,.p.,�' rYS �.>'«�,�t .'?'�"�:,,�;—..rr s"•s';a-'''1�cYdc�.= � -•::^;�Y'.+i. ia� �•a 4�+.r�' �`f;:z-. x 4.- -.LS x 2 t"r.;�<.,�� a .-�",<;.: "..-�•rl�r• rase.^3:'`S ! 'a... ..mak,,x,,� r .,-„ ...r.i.,ti a``"tTa. ...u. si ., '^�J �:.s,•... n,r.-,.. ,. !'��,��','', . ���1.. a ti GARY R.O'CONNOR ARCHfTECT,AIA 8' g ICORYEuernEEr wn,cmow WALLLEGEND E�iwOwgiro wpua f�ax� ZONIN&COMPUTA710NS t1 ;. , == cmau < n�, '4. 4 ro.vuwfomwwiNornec�max �><>•a 1 ..� �a� n, ,! ,++ . roquti �V to YOfX.fiOE ••k .1 i is `kz �� 'c 2Kplq a .�� :X3.` Yv `R ��. k•fl1V110. —-- 9 A.L d}aioYAlle�' a7v �y "" M�+a $rn DaitldtA5/ mu ftmmPwLV'b- 43 �>o+" rf»f M1l ;r "14 tit". lW V. W4,owtow", Xmit, two, Amts. MEN Waw .Nil 1]ft 0 } LL. �' 'Lp�7�1114'tA87 'IIE f� +7 f Q r'r 4 �wur�'"fafa.:w.v PRDK9{E DhIIlnq/DO�IKM10.1FMigW l ar�n mnwt* tl N..W IM6l,wmff,KM.tlw um '®' �' � PNOPOSm DwFllnlC PlN6 .on n a.- A-5 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN>w�r.rd" PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR 7 ROOF PLAN GARY R.• • •- • rr SII�r it�s{L312'u f`1sCCalgtsf-�rd+f'c^:i[J1lJIq"+'p6v,.:f ���� �,14tl3'f 'fIC.wG)• ® il:t®L3F11�,.. _ .. .,. . 1 IM 3 i UI fuss-t -.�� . mai SCa 1 S" - 3f3SS: ..2fmR AY ■twat1 { .... .._. _._.......___ ; - a. rxr�aasmss zrsf�fs- szrr'�•�,tm—a ■�rJ�� .�.�NI rr■ f I �llllllll IIIIIIII 1_I1II(1I111l!llEliilllilll -_v£� .f p{■{ .,r r� ® • L - - -�-".-� -: w•.w •w■mfw:fw.. su§'e+scc�fa �+v+A.+..+.u�..-F�.i" � {��,fa--��---- �F!' �-f•'7 {&749a�[S3il��T�~@' �1���� �i><.w,a�s� . '.�� Git+�� ®� �� � ��rsp�-----���i I`�IiY�ll•�� . ��� ��. � '�9� � 'd �?i�■lu! ta�:9�n�x ��' Lam..--:� .rr cwrar. utacswsm .. ... . Y y• egRM R.O'CONNOR ARCHMT.AK SCORMLOPEET E IN t�QtttQit/f•f[tQt/ �<�� 'L�,}',,�Ar»t p g. ••8 ��i �� � 8.r?�. ��� _ 3i i Pi" 4 ltl�ti `r a• - 'fit, ' I 1'.Yr -�.�mx«�.t.-•r � yr wp SIE«. ,.. �.. • � rul s('Ea @■y /iia IInns - l ctia��$z�i u�1+•��./�"py�i/II(� 'air"ra~i 0�'9�_i�_ f IIT Q • ON �� GARY R.6'C0NN0R ARCHnCT,M soa�.v�__ 1M91Rif M'tlex�m/ 'uva�zobNCOye•% WALLLEGEND �rur ' ZONING COMPUTATIONS ; &Uzi, sa>us'.estu� if''.r` - - - •� a 'I I fic�mnsu• �' .uwv, u�u tioc,..aE ` •rhidarb °'Whp 4T • - trr%Wo ✓o Irr R NORTH ELEVATION rwew.ra I"`'""�h��� r SIG � h6 rAL raaYMltrplpeDl }leu D%iMPim IML lr1�m�HSR.r0�6dr, rurr .I }'� rp�4pnMgnrOyw' alfr .nmwaawx met ur weitD!, •v. /,\ 3 .' rouawne.xu emu wu. rav 1 ief IA Itn SPECIFICATION OUTLINE , rmwo.nctnunwwlwur. rorc �'.®uwanunauwur '�V1OFDReetliR nmanuacalnmva[umfo.tmla ren '3 a�.®eemonromlw[mncsnt urlr we r,v�lwc '= IUEItO.fplsrLNYIWIRVG PROPOSED SHED FLOOR PLAN MWEST ELEVATION s rew.ra I tj f �� Rro�teontwmrmwleutouma rixtRta�4aayt.t%*>dat.m - rSWS-mT 3 � y � rwrii>aiv, A,8 1 EAST ELEVATION rw v...a _ - _ �SOUTH ELEV47ION ecuew.ra - I �xG►t TOWN OF SOUTHOLD HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Instructions for "CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS" Application required for Building Permit on Registered Landmarks ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED: . 2 1. Application: (1 page) f g ® 2. Notice of Disapproval: issued by the Building Department, dated within sixty(60) days, t. ® 3. Agent Authorization Letter: for Owners consent when using a representative. t; ± [] 4. S.,0§'! ssi+?ii i tetlals: provide copies of each of the following, to present the > oue l(plaft:attd details of the proposed 0166 t't`,for review by the HPC Commission.. [] S. Building Checklist: to be completed with all applicable items marked,,. s, 6. j0i?dtd&sbt`building,�s.sTraunding area and;', ao.p t uilclings,,pi ed; 4xGt;;ailaoh;`ed to copy°piper (Photo images�lmbeded an:th drawings with Plans.) Pq-7. Property Survey and Site Plan: showing existing structures and proposed addition. 31 ss M"!8. Draw sets o posed impravrrtetlts a#"`l4 scaf a t iricf ie IA as- (31 :; =pro Flo; sr Plans°.est �'Pl(a ie) of existhigKKs -ctutex,and pi'4 ) s almprents; Building Elevations of all sides affect�ti;*�iuith kiuitdifitrbo-g��s�a d alt'exterior finish materials; include construction and ornamentation details; Outline Specilric4tions: Wi- dW&.Doer:S�teduie,°or,references shown, wiings _ r fiftlsh st I etv �aah lites & muntins ,00r to include-, zanufcturer,:exterid w,, ,Y tYp j d. designs, profile, trim casing, notes &details. (Electronic PDF submission as } requested.) ]EJ 9. Samples, supporting materials: may be requested., All Submission Materials to be included with application. Failure to submit drawings and materials may result in delays in the approval process. F It is s{rarigly sug esteii thaniho a illeant review,1heyHPC Handbook and request a Pre.L1p)ii�atifln;;111lleet� igbef ;r' suimitting ftirittil applica#ion. Nlee#i gs are on the third Tuesday of each month at 4 OQ pm irtTbv`rt:Hall Annex Executive { "'board Room. All applications must have a representative,at-the hearing in order to be reviewed. Sections of local laws authorizing review by the Historic Preservation Commission of proposed work on designated town landmark properties are in Chapter 170 of the Southold Town Code. A TOWN OF SOUTHOLD HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPLICATION Viribenf>Bertaitlt.� DArE 7/14!?�l OWNERS NAME ' ADDRESS 9aia �t�re Q9ei�t 1JY t195T - w. PROPERTY ADDRESS 95 Slav V Sx OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE, GamCf' axmo , AIA-�k�rchxts1 �.° -- PHONE 69^3973635 -MAIL 3. --. TAX MAP NO, X4 '4"+� �1 _-_ DATE ACQUIRED -20.0341- STATUS: LOCAL LANDMARK IN LANDMARK DISTRICT.4�• NATIONAL HISTORIC REGISTER - PROPERTY ZONE Single FamilyDwellirig PROPOSED USE = `iii" e-'Fxntly3aelliz�, ; _ EXISTING USE , 4 .. y PROPOSED WORK: REPAIR ADDITION , X. RENOVATION NEW WINDOWS. NEW DOORS; REPLACE SIDING .-x .. REPLACE ROOFING ; NEW FENCE.. x. NEW SIGN.- APPROVALS IGN.APPROVALS REQUIRED: ZBA TOWN TRUSTEES PLANNING BOARD SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES To be determined based on \ ` CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE, _._ approval process. I understand and agree that no work on this request shall commence until written approval " has been given by the Building Department if a Building Permit is required. If no permit is required (such as replacing fagade materials or new fence), written approval must be received from the Historic Preservation Commission., OWNERS SIGNATURE -. -7- �� 4 i C 3firf(fti' ,o aarniltltAiipl)cifd6 i AUTHORIZATION (Wheie the Applicant is not the Owner) I, Vincent Bertault WiIidtt gat �c 95 Navy Street (Print property owner's name) (Mailing Address) s do hereby authorize 't3ar3%: :�' aincir; x (Agent) to apply on my behalf to the 3 Southold Building Department= Fx- i z 75 i f (Owner's Signature) (Date) Vi_ncent.Bertault (PaintOwner's Narrtej— _ f R t t f ,I � _ F < ''' '' ' �S 1 y Y�i { _ ...i f i 1 ��� t f 4 C 1 Historic Preservation Commission 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 } z Re:95 Navy Street,SCTM #1000-26-1-12.2:; To Whom It May Concern: I'm writing this on behalf of myself(Evan) and my wife (Lynn Lewis)This letter serves to address comments and questions regarding the proposal of V. Bertault and the renovation of his home and barn located at 95 Navy Street, Orient NY 11957 (SCTM #1000-26-1-12.2.). As context, we are Mr. Bertault's closest contiguous neighbor. Our house is located immediately to the West at 2395 Village Lane.We purchased the home on Village Lane in 2014 and I have been coming to Orient since the early 70s and have owned property in Orient Village for the last 13 years. As background,we believe strongly that it is every homeowner's right to improve and upgrade their property to make it more livable and extend its useful and comfortable lifespan.We support V. Bertault's desire to do this with his property,-all within the framework of renovation and € construction guided by the HPC. L 3 - Generally speaking, we have few substantive comments regarding the renovations to the main g house. We trust in the HPC's careful review and application of standards to ensure the renovated house is in keeping with its historical heritage and is sympathetic in its design to the surrounding aesthetic. Even with whatever design adjustments are made between the HPC and V. Bertault, my personal opinion is that once it has weathered, it will feel very in keeping with other properties in and around the village. We have more concerns with the barn towards the rear of the property that fronts Willow Street. t Among them: 1 r The current design of the barn does not seem to be in keeping with the house and the surrounding area. It is not an unattractive design but seems to be an extremely modern interpretation of a barn structure/shape. As a homeowner who has done smaller-scale renovations including a dormer and a small accessory structure, across several years we have answered dozens of very specific questions regarding the design and been held to a standard that ensured the end result would generally be in keeping-both in placement and overall design -with the surrounding structures and homes. In its current iteration, it does not seem that the 95 Navy barn is being held to the same standard. I cannot think of any other similarly modern aesthetic with the same degree of prominence (visible from several roads/frontages) in the village. 95 Navy Street Comments Page 1 of 3 10/19/20 i The placement of the pool is very close to the underlying root structure of a beautiful and very mature copper beech that is bisected by our Western property line (see page 3). While money can certainly buy many things, it cannot buy a tree as beautiful, healthy,and mature as this one. It should be imperative to the renovation process that every precaution is taken to maintain the health ` of this tree, particularly as digging a pool has the potential to significantly and negatively impact the beech. g The current plan has a pool at the rear of the barn structure and a hedge on the Western edge of our two properties. I am not sure the current code requirements but it will, in effect; mean that we are staring at their pool and in turn, they are staring at us and our backyard while they enjoy their pool with the proposed 4' hedge. While there is currently no separation between the two properties,the two areas are also not currently high traffic. It seems important that there be a more significant and possibly higher separation between the two areas if the proposed pool is built.As I am not an expert on any required code, if this is not a code issue, it-might simply be a conversation between us and V. Bertault. In a more general sense,there has been some degree of demolition/renovation in one form or another going on at 95 Navy Street for the last 5 years.At its worst, during the arhythmic flow of changing and moving the barkn, after each stint of construction we would find between 2 and 4 empty vodka bottles in our bushes. I use this as an illustration of two points: (1) Whether it is the purview of the HPC or the,Southold Building Department, I believe there should be a requirement to begin and end the project within a reasonable, agreed-upon timeframe.A long, drawn-out construction process takes a negative toll not only on the owner but certainly on the neighbors and the neighborhood and (2) It should be incumbent on V. Bertault or an authorized representative to make sure the site is being well managed and is considerate to his neighbors whether or not they are contiguous to the property. r I am happy to discuss any of these- or other- issues at the convenience of the NPC, Southold Bldg. s Dept. or V. Bertault. I hope he and the HPC are able to reach a reasonable compromise that allows Mr. Bertault to realize his renovation goals while meeting/exceeding the considerations of the HPC in an effort to maintain the building heritage and aesthetic of our historic neighborhood. f Regards, Evan and Lynn Lewis 95 Navy Street Comments Page 2 of 3 10/19/20 W44ow, STREET +715, y F f�eYh+uY' � > �er 4yna a As �„•r' els._S�j^:y: !�•Me . Tii clY .Ax ra;�. « �3v ewe ,u :...t r "'• y ':S,r” _- ' ILl6''MV—Y .C•., � t. ..,.r+er,..� TcLAV' '+S u i aF✓ . �r€ P.767�6EGP17L[CITEflti@FRIX Location.of ccipper beech highlighted above. f 95 Navy Street Comments Page 3 of 3 10/19/20 Ellen McNeilly PO Box 314 Orient NY 11957 631-323-3989 ,eRnenelliv,06arthiink.ne-t September 26, 2020 Historic Preservation Commission Edward Webb, Chairman Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Application Dated 7/15/2020 95 Navy Street, Orient NY SCTM # 1000-26-1-12.2 Dear Chairman Webb and Board Members: am the resident owner of 205 Willow Street, a corner property at Vincent Street, opposite the subject site's Willow Street frontage (Taxlot 26-1-4). 1 am also the owner of 70 Vincent Street (Taxlot 26-1- 5), approximtely 50 feet to the northeast of the subject site, as Vincent Street becomes Willow Street at the curve. l have been an active member of the Orient community for over 30 years. Based on the history of the subject site, its current Certificate of Occupancy, the actions by the Zoning Board, Preservation Commission, SC Department of Health Services, Town Code Enforcement, and a review of the Proposed Plan (July 2020) under consideration', I strongly urge the Historic Preservation Commission to undertake the Recommendations below: 1. °.R6to -Mz-9'.rand,#ddres's°'the violations of CoUnLnlssl2n:sjurte 2014 decisfon. Large, full grown Holly trees were removed, not'relocated; mature, historic Willow tree neglected, not preserved. Declared "dead" by Applicant, contrary to Certified Arborist evaluation that is "thriving". Multiple attempts to remove the Willow tree, as recent as this month, cutting of branches required notification of Town Code Enforcement. Proposed plan excludes the required "relocation" of Holly trees and "preservation" of historic Williow, as if they never existed, nor subject to conditions of the Commission's approval. 4 See Appendix: • May 22, 2003- ZBA# 5218—Subdivision by prior owner to prep for 2005 sale to Applicant (Mr. Bertault)for$725,000 • November 18, 2004- SC Department of Health Services—Environmental Review Letter • April 17, 2014 ZBA#6729— Relocate Existing Barn and Shed F • June 18, 2014—Historic Preservation Commission Cert. of Appropriateness—Relocate Barn and Shed • Building Permits Issued: #39186-Z(9/15/2014);#41328-Z (1/30/2017);#44198-Z (9/23/2019) • Violation Notifications and Code Enforcement(2020 & Prior) Ellen McNeilly t 2. 'Nrayv sco„ipe„ofreirfeir°'tci.only ffie_proposecl:enlargemenof the=siiigte-fafiriily',tic�us . The proposed change of use of the accessory barn to accessory apartment and accessory shed to pool cabana is not guaranteed an approval by the Zoning Board. The change of use informs all aspects of architectural function and design, as it seeks to satisfy occupant desires and building codes. F Accessory Barn: It is self-evident that the modernist design to the accessory barn is inappropriate, negatively impacts the character of the historic district, and is unnecessary given the existing fenestration system. If the accessory barn is not converted to habitable space, the restoration the existing structure can be achieved. Accessory Shed: No detailed plans are provided that show the proposed conversion and enlargement of the shed to a pool cabana use. Detailed plans are required not only for architectural evaluation, butalso for building code review, as the recently adopted Town code { relating to pool houses is very specific as to size (max 350 so, number of rooms (limited to a ; single bathroom—sink and toilet only), requirement that plumbing fixtures must drain to a Suffolk County Health Department-approved sanitary system in a conforming location, among other issues. Lastly, the proposed enlargement would alter the building envelope of existing 180-+ square foot shed structure, making-it unrecognizable as as a historic, accessory shed. Again, the change of use requires Zoning Board approval and is not guaranteed, and if denied, the f restoration of the existing accessory shed'structure can be achieved. { Therefore, it is reasonable to suggest that the Commission should reserve judgment relating to the accessory barn and shed structures until after the Zoning Board of Appeals makes a r determination as the proposed change of use dramatically impacts the treatment of facade, fenestration, roofline, among other items. I With the historical context in mind along with the added visual and verbal verifications by the Owner/Applicant, Mr. Bertault, the following outlines many serious concerns with the current proposed plan. Original Vision for Subject Site Misleading ? The incremental approach to seeking special permits has revealed that statements made in obtaining the 2014 approvals to relocate the accessory barn and shed structures misled the agencies and the public as to the Applicant's true vision which is now in full view as represented by the current proposed plan. For example: 1. The ZBA#6729 decision reflected the Zoning Board's understanding that: ” The Applicant wishes to preserve and restore both accessory structures and to relocated them to eliminate the current need to drive cars over the existing septic system and to create more open space for gardening and recreation in the center of his property" Ellen McNeilly 2 2. In response to Patricia Moore's opposition letter dated March 13, 2014, the Applicant's representative and project architect Gary R. O'Conner, states: x "As per the testimony at the public hearing, Mr. Bertault shared his vision of restoring the barn to its original integrity and character." ... "As discussed during the hearing, the barn shall be used to house a vehicle and maritime equipment." It is clear that the 2014 special permit applications to relocate the accessory barn and shed was the z first step towards a larger vision that generates significant impacts and is inconsistent with the Commission's mission and the purpose of the historic district. As such, the earlier statements made by the Applicant regarding the intent to preserve the "original integrity" and "character"were knowingly false and misleading. The proposed plan reflects the Applicant's pursuit of"owner enjoyment" and increased property value to offset the $725,000 purchase. The proposed plan is not a proposal to seek relief from a hardship inherent in the subject site. Upon purchase of-the property, Mr. Bertault was fully aware of its limitations and constraints. Since the 2014 approvals, work to relocate the accessory structures has taken place; however, not always in accordance with the approval conditions. Violation and Enforcement The Commission's Certificate of Appropriateness issued on June 18, 2014 clearly stated that: "the applicant has agreed to make a good faith,effort to preserve the property's existing trees and shrubs (particularly the holly trees) during the relocation process, and a letter ... by Michael Johnson of Johnson Tree Co., Orient, outlining how to protect the willow tree adjacent to the proposed location of the barn structure ... will be part of the applicant's final building permit application ... " x I , Holly Trees I No "good faith effort"was made to preseve and relocate two, large, mature Holly Trees due to the i I approved relocation of the accessory barn as shown on the December 12, 2012 property survey and l the Proposed Building Relocation—Sheet A1" dated 1/21/2020. They have been destroyed. When asked, the Applicant said that they were "too expensive" to relocate. In light of the improvements r j underway, the scope of the proposed plan, and the significant investment, using "cost" as a reason to > violate the Commission's decision is not credible. The majestic size and height of the Holly trees (as tall as the barn) played an important role in blocking winds and protecting the historic Willow tree. Their destruction put the historic Willow in jeopardy. 4. 1d' O>YW. a w� �. a'•.ek ,..a rd„ i. I I Ellen McNeilly 3 I C I Historic Willow Tree As recent as this month, attempts to remove the Historic Willow tree, prompted notification and a site visit from both the Town Code Enforcement department and the Town Attorney's office. The current proposed plan Sheet A-4 dated 7/23/2020 removes the existing Willow tree and proposes x a "new Willow tree", providing no details as to type or size, but rather, an unrealistic illustration of a very mature, healthy Willow tree canopy. 4 At R, 444 rr. ,t 1 .: x s > 3 s The Johnson letter as noted in the 2014 Commission's Certificate-ofiAppropriateness is not readily available in order to evaluate if any steps were taken to protect the Willow tree. At my request, Mr. Jonathan Shipman of Shamrock Tree Company, a t Board Certified Master Arborist on the North Fork, made a site inspection in September 2020 of the Willow Tree and concluded that: } it is alive and continues to show new growth ... I do not feel the tree is hazardous ... With proper maintenance, a new crown can r regrow allowing this historic tree to thrive." Even with damage due to the recent storm, the preservation of the Willow tree is possible. The recent cutting of branches to remove it entirely, and the assumption of its removal, as shown on the proposed plan is a violation and unacceptable. Environmental Quality Impact The Historic Preservation Commission application dated 7/15/2020 indicates that required additional approvals include the Zoning Board of Appeals; that is certainly true. However, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services is left blank. I am not well versed in Code Compliance as it relates to environmental review to know if the proposed plan requires additional approvals. However, based on the determination letter by the Suffolk county Department of Health Services dated November 8, 2004 in response to the ZBA# 5218 Lot Subdivision, it provided for two conditions: (a) ... recommended that the well on Lot 2 [subject site 95 Navy Street] be moved to a more optimum location"; and (b) "A covenant shall be provide ... and each lot is limited to a single-family residence only with accessory EIlen McNeilly 4 uses as may be approved by the Town of Southold." The suggestion is that the subject site should be fruther burdened by the impacts of additional habitable building areas. The proposed plan seeks the enlargement of the single family residence, adding a bedroom and a half-bath, and the conversion of the accessory barn to habitable living area;including a kitchen, full bath and bedroom. The enlargement of the accessory shed and conversion to a pool/cabana may also include a bathroom and associated plumbing which requires Suffolk County Dept. Health approval, and then there is the pool itself and its water management and treatment (no details shown ; on proposed plans). Visual site inspection and recent inquiries by sanitary system professionals has verified that infrastructure work has already been completed. Is there a permit for this_current work? Does it reflect the proposed plan yet to be approved or denied? Historicintegrity and Character Dismissed The architectural treatment to the existing buildings reflects a modernist approach not consistent with the preservation goals of the Commission, the Town and the community who are guided by the profile, use, and character of the original structures and its place within a historic district. f Single Family Residence Enlargement: The double height, voluminous space of the "summer dining"with its tower effect is a ,r modern approach that pushes the enlargement to the extreme, t Accessory Barn to Accessory Apartment: The entire "adaptive re-use" of the all the architectual elements of the structure is thoroughly against all historic building and historic district goals and principles. Furthermore, the visual impact is significant and evident from all angles— adjacent neighbors, Willow Street and Navy Street frontage. 3,;914 (I)SOOMWOMEWREN EW _- - .,_(�)SOUtlifi4TVEYIfiEi0Ef4VG --`-- '- 't�)S S1111ESiV+�I'tltflAERA'3NACtbNStAEET}__ Ellen McNeilly 5 _ f 1,��.. k•4Y. ji Y`•kw` Accessory Shed Enlargement to Pool/Cabana: Again, the change of use and enlargement of the 180 -+ sf shed alters the building's envelope to be € r .. unrecognizable as a shed and generates concerns regarding sanitary systems ' ;°.f 4 requires additional approvals. Comment is limited as no plan nor fagade details are provided for review. �4 1 Proposed Plan: Change of Use Impacts All Architectural Elements Every element of the the proposed plan requires approval by the Zoning Board of Appeals, as it increases the scope of the existing non-comformance of the subject site and contains multiple variance requests represented by the use change; front and rear yard requirements, lot coverage, floor area increases in multiple structures. The determination by the Zoning Board will significantly ' impact the proposed architectural treatment of the barn and shed. The change of use inherently triggers both desires of the occupant and building code requirements for light and air among other issues that require changes in the fagade and fenestration treatment as well as the roof line (plumbing vent stacks) Therefore, the,Historic Preservation Commission should reserve review and judgement on the accessory shed and barn structures, as it is not guaranteed that the change of use will be approved, a!§there is no justification for it. If change of use is denied, a full restor-ati611 of the accessory barn and shed structures can be a proposed plan that is deemed appropriate. s Thank you very much for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, Ellen McNeilly f Enclosure Appendix Ellen McNeilly 6 APPJENDIX TO ELLEN IMC, 'P-I,LLY .,S"UPMJSSI -N, DATED SE PTEMSER 26, 2020 P-H A PL(CATIO'N IC, 7/1 /22 . 95 NAVY STREET Historic Preservation Commission Application — July 15, 2020 95 Navy Street, Orient NY 11957 Selected Pages .- a ���#,� ..z � - may"y � �� �A•� _ `3r.,• .f _sal S��'e� a-. Y -^4ii}# �3C • a ' - m0. � �• t FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ' BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall q Southold. N.Y. �y��o2 i PRE EXISTING ; CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY JAN G R i C -- �. Dat =,.,, _, THIS CERTIFIES that the bui 1 ding._. Location of Property _ ,Hvyse,. o, p-n SCpeet ,Rao County lax Map No. 1000 Section 2�6_ 61ock___1 Lot 12.2 Subdivisi_4n led Map No.-Lot No -- conforais substantially to the Requirements for a Seasonal Dwelling built r Prior to: APit .,4 1957_.._ pursuant to which CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NUMBER °� ' 09I - . ;tlated JUNE 15 was"`issued. and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions, of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is s issued is":5 NAS:, -F. CURAGE Nd The certificate is issued Owners')_ of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO..�--_ - PLUMBERS CERTIFICATIONrDATEV_ Ft1A *PLEASE SEE ATTACHED INSPECTION REPORT. _ I Rev. 1/81 ZO/TO 39tid S33isnN1 aioFunos 179999LTE9 9T:TT 7TOZ/LZ/10 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPLICATION OWNERS NAME Vincent Bertault _ DAI-E 7115120 'f ADDRESS :95 . 11C) 4 ? PROPERTY ADDRESS `95. vy OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE - =R.°Q�Gcxin'°r�Af `.• Saltiltet: it 3 PHONE 609x_397-3635 - _ jjp�jL w_ 09':y' `"'rbdfec6mntl , 1000-26-0,1-12.2 DATE ACQUIRED TAX MAP N O, - - STATUS: LOCAL LANDMARK IN LANDMARK DISTRICT,X _ 4, " NATIONAL HISTORIC REGISTER PROPERTY ZONE EXISTING USE �Srii�Ie'FariiiT ` 'es' E'122' PROPOSED USE P rrr le,1~a= tesfaenae r .. - with aacessoz =apatzrzont.' r PROPOSED WORK: REPAIR ADDITION : x RENOVATION x,NEW WINDOWS NEW DOORS REPLACE SIDING x REPLACE ROOFING ; .x- NEW FENCE , x, NEW SIGN: :s APPROVALS REQUIRED: ZBA x TOWN TRUSTEES — PLANNING BOARD ; SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES— To be determined.based on - . CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE _ _ - . _ _. approval process. I understand and agree that no work on this request shall commence until written approval :r has been given by the Building Department if a Building Permit is required. If no permit is required (such as replacing fagade materials or new fence), written approval must be received from the Historic Preservation Commission. OWNERS SIGNATURE �� °�•. k *ei �, v�'+S�`i•v'i. 5r�itf -'i rW$ .:�l1rt+Jni§'t'�'R= 1�v,�}� ��'.• a;��,�£f}�4 :�.-•mom ON 4�• x#�}t t .tilt c�r i '•`�'- 3.•,w `� Z. '��X z. ��'�',�j^ ..�a�css— 0'i�.uA :��_--�`�"x,u`�,xw.�� i d.��,y-�. act,�t r!'" S��`;�`t "=aS• { "3�i f, n., yam',`"' .� �. �",,,.•,.i,€.�• _'t- q x ^F�� R tit `y t ��f.. _ i, o».. r „•r""" �.,y.::t tj��`+ a.x.�Y...- .r t[qf ;F f� T'�.�. f r ...-.� ��t��': �v. �< /� € s Vin'=�:,.wse-•a,.wx.� ' }t'«�k°��_ �.e t' •��f `� §� ��pbx K.44 •t I "E. ..,; ��� -� x' t E' +aS'Y,• p%F �4''-.h rti 'nrz r +,�, ,1 ^� -'tt'� r� atco..,.` xr t r„'. ig}j I�`' °a.�c��" "r.1 `�z.. �:• s.,a,'k€t+'«',�'�"'39"`, '€ r aF.� .,rev r�3 ±:'„if �"!'�y�.€' ,ick"'�-•;.s',.'-.4t^:. ,,,x✓` *`"�,"',� t +:N..� .w. + � 6 5��.. ,� 1 dr_s ..�. .€, 1 Y. .fix � i �+ �.S `•rv.•..t• s 1 r� ';•s-: 1 :.4 ��' i , .� gyp, Si,. �. m .:,roar a oc✓x;.3., •`a'»a,.' kT '.. .li': ,� }: .y ;_.. "C: ^, � .•'kvm•®. '+ . SII i 5 �. {}<- E ,..,,i,€xr x3� •-I+.r iaA€+- 7''(C;lr.'`41�. k 'ac .f� :w ''�` at•3"-�.:i~''-°�'c4••v'ti.- 4 F: 7 :,� rr•-1 + :,�•..�. ,€ - .X,`Y" n*v^• ,^r. s-g �T. i. o i _Y. �h.:fi+ rv, �C:= ,fit ,,. 't .'•s”. „vs ,,.v,t..s,,<„K„•,Kt..yv..}yz ppb�.z ..F .,:. ,..„',"�E+..d e^>� s'"-�. F `" � �A: '�sx .,,i': :e^. .S^}..,� S°'L,, ��,.. _ ...,�;�x`t + •'ytt 1•'"�.Ld .^li;�rexv ,• y,; 5. �^p .a „v.� „..' `r _s=„ y »,3'` ,.€ +f," ib s .Vt r'�' .><,> rwr z td. }�Y, •� dot^€ c r € 3 .. � � a _��,�"� •x,'�:.�d' 4 •h�,,..: Taq� .��. .,a �;g' az.s :^w;;-`- .f ."'.-s".a^a°" '�y,.�.�.,h�� ��t. y, _ � ��c•�•.t�'"Z^a^,�;.`.°sz`'«P�,�,§!� r S x,{. boo ..w ' ', .".."�'`�, c-. c`� m. w^'�•> ,'.._'f,,`.z•air"'i'".°, "'.B,^^M'L`^`�^ °•w �°S`�- ,t '* ;y '�s..`zf' '°.., .� "�Y 'd' s- `':'=;"- :1 " i s gv^e a •^:%: * a� t r iso wr _?rid aS q r wcr�C _ ;: / ^ri^turf•tea o < -� i�: .�= "++s`i,.t:_.. .r" •;.t '.,:r . "' mac. .-^' '*sl,sk^„ -`a° ''1Y „ -.i-�;,,�. •`:- } •`' >o :..,.,KJ�-�•a�*`` ": -3'r ``.r�,:�"`r x v...r°.,t, .a s :� :,.y..,,'�., x '`- � .z..�'^� •'"" -Ss:.'• v�cr ��•.�.• "r"'�" c� ,�`''.�, ,�-� t-a�.,.e^•. .,.. ;.. .y... �-'�• .� irEmlll �s"` ". ¢" r g. 4 AREA=19,M SaFT GARY R.OVONNOR ARCfi=,M SURVEY OF PROPERTY AT ORIENT z eoanreimaEr ,�,n TOWN OF SOUTHOLD t7wx�Eere�ar"r� �:—v SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY. } 1000-26—M-122 SCAL&1'—30' ° s OEMIM M 2012 uwr.A 2M3(Loans WALL) WILLOT H/0/1'im*m L& WWA4 K GffiL x7or. 'H6Y36'00"E Sr.57' - - SOUTfiV[EWOFSHEDAND-BARN=__ n¢ ! O U *156 low cl� y. U) cr LL - 27 `" z � ,yin' y 12Q212&2.Y , ?''„_ `� 2 EASTVIEWOFMECHANICALROOM&SHED " ^ STREET NAVY an�ros.uc�om,�m r�.�vn ,•�,t°�"�'h}� '� +,�: `:1� ��.w.arw.a maa+ tar 0 i nM b senrmov WP mo.aw N Ot Hmx a. xw a ocAwst am x vc saran oowry awns a 7w or ura rq w.� 70n4 As riE/bn2.a � •' ,< �, {"�az WM'veoorntr U=M wa,ar W ae mrrc "eMw��hk�'a16107W63M 0�IJC9aP. � r� c ,,, � � -_._ 'tl�fta�tR,YtATle4serLE' .wrx�arxnisra�arpviobes'sudirr+s`eiuziagt ' p� � �'�� ` ei>a±nsau+.Wa+6�•a.��m < +X'aetnorrauor nat�e►'+b�isFtstiC�e+aartur +� '��� .,°;, rn177..ttYDf;SYC+kv'97tle-S+dRM9dA 2:iHL tDfR>r+tAdW()765-1797 1 ' t,�' aa. lsxmt Irv»Aot Ats Kv!,woatrrtstNu[os glYi'- ;l+A`80X� aRoeEmrraoaTouovE scafwor<m+rs�x a,n#�cmT= r2J0,nt(tEi�.s�rr - '!""� "'"4"^ f NOOK 5o�ti Haa Act�197c. 12.27,9 - _ _ — ter• A-2 SITE PLAN PRIOR TO BUILDING RELOCATIONscuc..s a EASTVIEWOFSHEDANDBARN ""°�_ Wl LOW; STREET - EL42' N85°28''30•E GARYR.OrCONNOR ..�., 65.93' ,EL 5.2' , ARCH TECTA ALA EEoa18ISTREEr LSMO .�„ �p rn.ss orv[cs `i j mosm s -' 2'r 05 N pp ZONING COMPUTATIONS ._ N � ��e� .e•``'��:�. n»s"3•' � YrlEalrmM anmas. vara, ww.we h . i � Y°LlQ[fEFra >1bR nrrt MGw�' 'iEL.4,9' N89°5 6 ` 'a`" t ,�.,' " `s`�$ t^ilu�ma 6'00'E 54.53' � '<s•* d'` tam. „`. M t E�+a �, uofsnrr. Ed6R43 em= I011!t r ~ t's'�t 1�n{ >i:�r '�" "� 1¢ � �s ?`•, + w�' rm u. my ��/�r rrt � li • b` -�,�" �K� y� ` "�^ �' tr�tl�M�E+'s:<> sr�w �°owm:..��i r<ry� f ( :��; ;�=„,y:•” �; r �yg tf7�,�'` ews u; a.o ;w. it q¢ao7m I" t`. '1 .rrri 1`' Napt{FNrp o'F",i-y dr_canavai*nur- ', 'rk Lj Z l r,• s 'FR LL- p a'..fl¢i� <'� �± � .3' �tu, Y,�� fir#'.=�, �.•'�v�e,,•' 5 � ? Via... k` s t.`_ Wn f 6'px� �u� M e W£ w S' 4 3X° •°���n�6$ i '�, "rs"'°�o_uau. � �`� s s.&r;�i'., ,�•°3 �� ;,�.. „���'����i"fit � ��'S� � - o ..SEr� ,;���' _. Q�©�QI, ,� ,1. .•, �e�' ..�� �a r,�p ,a 'r�;a;„.�°3 �� e� Owl — _ nEsuars, � �riG.roNc e • r4 ^.eaa,.,n��.M:'n.ta;:.: - `'� 14.' � ^' t 't �� }y' �.,� '��i t �i�! �9 ���� sf�.�� �t#fir' gN� Or.u��esanwie 3'r PINN6m EM V° � y S 0°ERn UVEaIDE 1.61 PRWOSWnU 'aoq&�v nes' :83_ .cnsrm �'AQ t PROPOSED FUL9:SREPLANrc ,t .zoc _'ZO WPDSp I I RITERENDMa i ' t •- t RESOLUTION#6.17.14.1 June 18,2014 gVEd-ana enes-sr RE: 95 Navy Street, Orient,SCTM#1000-26-1-12.2 Owner: Vincent Bertault WHEREAS, 95 NkNT:$jrqet,,0'if s on the Town of Southold,New York State and Nati nl hk Places,mid WHEREAS, 66 T6wqJL'A:WJ1 % An in ti6 'edd-0 and WHEREAS, an applicaddh:tvis;§uVM,,--tt6d to relocate an existing accessory barn and an accesso —28,2014 and WHEREAS Commissioners met with the applicant to review the proposed project on April 15, 2014,and WHEREAS, a public liearirjg for the purpose of considering approval of die proposal was held on June f7,j2014,and WHEREAS, tlic,'P!t)pbsed relocation of the lifstoilic Barn and shed,accc4rdifig'fi,the plans submif 4'will result in the strtid0cs bm-4 idstored and pr'escrvcd as is,and WHEREAS, thq:proposed;,Mlocation of the barn and shdc'(',AQ I afford the an pircant the ability to fnWX66 thd use of his property while pmscrvJP9,thc,character bf the WHEREAS, the relationship between the existing bam structure and the main dwelling was significantly altered when the property was previously subdivided with Southold Town Planning Board approval,and WHEREAS, there are longstanding precedents for relocating such historic structures throughout the Hamlet of Orient and the Town of Southold,and WHEREAS, the new front yard location of the barn structure(facing Willow Street)is in keeping with other properties in the surrounding area,and WHEREAS, the proposed relocation of the bam structure was approved by the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals(#6729)on April 17,2014,and i WHEREAS, the applicant has agreed to make a good faith effort to preserve the property's existing trees and shrubs(particularly the holly trees)during the relocation ' process,and ' WHEREAS, 41eikry ;stibrr W'la- is Landitt'arks Prese'rvati ri,Commi§d&on J 2114'b `litlihael7' O; Y y- oMisoia;;a£Irhitsen`Tree Co:ryUieht,outlinm ;how to pt ,ct 0111WRllQi :t `:a 1 ab #a; posed location of the bam stra tore.The letter will'be part of the applicant's final building permit application and,it appears that the project requires no further review, F NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the Southold Town Landmarks Preservation i Commission;determines that the proposal as outlined in plans dated October 18,2013,and } nec1 oir Iaauarf,21,2014,,..on 1vy; 8 20i4aIast atiiztded on June 11,201t4,,b ;i}' nirer ai�cliile .meetthe�ciz ct, a fir approval;uriler.S$ctisn 170-8(A)of the S.otithbld'•1`6ft,- -roe BE IT FURTHER,RESOLVED,that the Commission approves the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness. MOVER:James Grathwohl,Chairman SECONDER:James Garretson,Commissioner AYES: Surchin,Parker,Feiler, Garretson,Grathwohl NAYES:Harper ABSTAINED:Webb RESULT:,AI?)?lt()'S�E17 Please note that any d,,e kdaa from the approved plans referenced above may require further review from the commission. Signed: James F.Grathwohl,Chairman,Landmarks Preservation Commission Date:TBD f t t Violation Notifications and Code Enforcement r r 'R T 44 I Ma nag V 14,tt MOR '4341041 ........................... ............... .......... OM:Irl IF Puts --X;�,KRNM' S t, "j, If's A, ; ON 0A............ . v ; W. R q q! KIM j g,W!i&'Y M�t� M!, 1&*'SM7 9i; M, .15"`7 SUE -N. -lit "M, N 7� % _35W 4 Fzr,_U 4 X11 1W.", t "g, M_nr ;Rl� h 0;,-gg "i, lk"WtJjji�4 go WY -VA WMA4 WIN WeMT& NEON T 44 _jp g ek A:f�:��r"i;",P,�""i�*�,.:��!; ,F�J I 1w -F 07P'Vfth' �, 011 0,M R id" 9A nq� ;r-Ail, e N U Q ,k R M111-Ak VWI_11111�, F My Q 01__�1, N W." tool (W WZ*"� k 4,4".tog wp� Joe 5% Wd "R, M M Offil ggM;W 'f ON 4 hg" INN k Q'W I Kv T7, mg 0 TMM peg WK V �;en AMM-a ij4 VIRNM i M j -U 0oR-,_-0�'4MR Alf, M v'R R NN z B i�-14 R P -, '_", -V-� , ._-, v -5 K 1: 1 iffiP,M15"M my n 4- Ye �-KIM' W, mom NINO Zvli P, ------------------ ——---------------- - - — - ---------- ......... ........ < _', '.� `.`n CSR ". '�'1"nµ •..;+? x n c'�t €mss. 3 - a„ r x ..yi�,.'3.��Y �v'P- {�,i�`£>• "9x'8 _ ...3� >'P,* � n '-'.+�n,Y m:'a�.3,txrm`.s �Axe„ .tx},r<��9 sy�:� <a ,Y,<�t> .� mkt�y�e,;;E ,"s�, --.'i"*E:3�'s,�,- aa-n,w•t��.z t - � . "�:���� :{,.;.«.'-��:.g`s; +�'�,ii'va�_ -s`..L°ar.f`�..•;�45% _ �rs�, ��'."�. rr:.',f°��%+x � < ' "n+Fs•``4 a°a E?Yy':,' �'.g J':i Yk %;+Ai' -` i ,�,s,'.,4-..� �� S�.Y#�.�a - "`r ,we:K,r"x'�za,,.,,YZ�&`.�«I;P;YX""J-id= ��'; ""'�`r"al�,-.�.qy'z Ja''Z�',"est ,F"'7�&'.:<gaµ.."`t�, - ".�>. ems,• , _ dP" °'j,' ��•i`k�"is i?.N?rn '4".'.- .'•aE �`E � L"yrs i*a.£,P';,', ti��,r i�s�.� �'i������t,�C.�� �.4�GXJt,4` t1:6���5&&�+++ ��b-B��>�1,U�a@PR�`L'�"•.�,.. -?"�i%�;i,,; .>"e��k x. -, . , All `�°iSiyy,="` '.:aexg<U�,r4$1.�Qtlf,�J,�V?p.-?'S6wvd Qn,v£,."ka•w[.;ia«>v',r{1;_�'.<tS��'V`�'`"eps�w;.Y5R➢' `WM4yv•.�>?.,'u""iS`r£�.�G..u,��-,G.,y`rt,"°jvrEb�T^�"''�_-�%a/�µ�s��`a.5'k5»a-.,x:.�"-'..:C->"�L"--".X°.�'g t ` In uo „ - L3;' ';.L ; � < 3�I5 °.r �s �ry�` ..'".^;"f;�"> ���i ,,.. .�.v� a�.,�s., .�-,„�>s:a`•r•, �,�, '4i�x,�,•,<<9 i' "_ x F .d' 4 mx �,.v 4� � i u✓ a# �<;�`" „i.3-'��,fwaa;�*«.�4 ,� Y +�.' •�-���}�•.� ,t. •-� � i'' ,w to ea� s� cs � � m y�� � ��, •,�� - �» �,„"s*� g'�'�I�� ea,-� � `f-�^ �_�� _ s '`�``�, ' `fig ,r�� x'<' �" •c '�+���' ., _?'.n5"x�,�;4 .%a'bi: �a,'"�*��a„�- 't�.. x&,�7a ��°��°;X,�t;�;F-t ,�a��n.:.•>',`i=��.�€&:.r�`-;��,� `r?_E«."'��—��,'1±�e.� �t�>:� `��.r;C »,� ry ; <, �. r:E ^"%'`` °a ^, ', :`n �^C:^ .'�. ""-`s;;r- " » r '`•`=,'`' ; �;�:J:� »`�� �fn"I`nA `�a.,. .'"sri� € 1 e=u-�"�i>'.•`'e Y,z.^> q.».„ _� - 5, -n {V �, � a g,� g, g; , y .�.y�; 3Fa� a,W y gkp °.r g¢,' 3„ � g° 4, "t, 3 h ,- k ASI ,.,.:' ax T� "$�,,�� "^`,�^ .. px r_ ^°s*z.,,9'a�' s` S'r '"=="`,iqq-`a"�.. 9; .:, .—....—•..,;L'....A# v's..�` :,mr^i4..9 ;s pa.zxa,�" ...w4- '2' , � � � z,,,•rz-,s".�y<x,--!" 2':�• �"^.fit ,xw,�3: ;h. *.e�?- ' �{ ,�ti;S z..� � .� 54x.- �` <.; „ =5:.,. <s= "if t _ a.¢t 3i: } 's'-- aq .r�,_1a�x.,; `" �-C,"z»d'^'�. d•; a s:.€` A,< •irti ' y -�j,. f— •.y.,w .7. Ear< C,i s3 wka- s`y �����Y�„T.�.*z°�'e x +,e s���;�i�3 �lT�I ".'Y;_�h.�. �.k.°yr?^'.'°us�N a",',".%•P y,..;s�`-`Y'Ne is3�'�s� .;�"�6� }+se"-'ek���A,iS n::$s' e " -Ka'*x<.•e rvp t�' x`" 3 ? 3t ^a "'�w .�i" s �' =z` g �°.a;� �? (�h >�• .��+y`- *.�k;y `�ti'i".;r><'� €`� �+a�,�'.,..e,''_ �t�'1`h^;�°"�*. ,mss:��e_>.?7 ,�� a<ss�,r.%,„ , 5, "`�'�t^^.�. �r,�b�'v��' t:c�°:.� �' ":i'er�-f� "z ',r'�p ex„°r5"9v o,skv $...,.��<<v , r gs yMs "�n f•� � �,S\ R%i f. L n 'tc �s.«,v.Y•' 1 .:,off= R3 w�:�� �3'^',.a<�.' ��kTr�^�c �.w. `�.'e4�:' � :iia -���as�� -'�`a.,,�a.*°"s"�""""'��">•. _ �`SLe$€>-<< <�;�.�,��' �s; :-�;».`Ai" ' rY de' $, WJE did _fir - "q� � x�✓,�p'.r�e�+ `A o �, �v`� .-& ,}.% kik �� �i # s� � � � ® � i vs$ r � ,G7' n s � x , '`i�"'»s -s£f` _ - � °• � �'r �_�,�+,�'f„-'"8�i'^S:'�sy„xa. `�F�.r� ';MSF”R&��.�i�. �;1$.:W:W'�1.Cw`3��e:.d'"�`"5,., fi�;.&."A`•AM �-��i,4.�^.agkY..,�,w e Shainrany � lt:E F Board € SA IVY#xz59� ° , 1 aso Waw '* ' Ma= i„ r10 i95-z, K 631-2962175 September 14, 2020 To whom it may concern, 1,Jonathan M.Shipman,owner of Shamrock Tree Company and Board Certified Master Arborist was asked to inspect a tree at the rear of 95 Navy Street in Orient.This large Willow has been d��iOgdd°in the pag by,storms. Despite losing the canopy and, Qr(tinues to push new9roW0,:,Pro _m thepg,Und inspection I conducted, l do notfoeltlie;tree is hh'zardous g or in the need of removal for any reason at this time.With proper maintenance a new crown could regrow allowing this historic tree to continue to thrive.Any questions you can reach me at 631-298-2175. t STttcere i Jonath dM.Shipman BCMA NY#11598 a September 12, 2020 Email to Edward Webb, Chair of Historic Preservation Commission ; G From: Ellen McNeilly<ejmcneill' eartkilinknet Subject: Shamrock Tree Gompariy he Date: Date: September 12, 2020 at 3:34:03 PM EDT To: Webb Edward�ted�V�lb:�Ccoptarrline:i�et> Good morning,Ted— Jonathan Shipman, Shamrock Tree Company, came by just now in response to my pleas for his expert opinion. As you,may know, Jonathan is the only Master Arborist, by certification, on the North Fork. He has taken care of many historic trees, including the one at the foot of Youngs Road, throughout Southold and beyond. He told me, and will write an email or letter to me within the next day or two confirming his assessment, that, with proper care, that tree could easily live another 50 years!! Having reviewed the site and tree in 2014, Mr. Shipman was shocked to see how it had been mishandled after the 2016 storm that damaged it—damage which had been partially caused by the non-permitted prior removal of large Hollies providing a wind break. Mr: Bertault had been enjoined in his 2014 Building Permit,'to retain tho'se`trees as well_ I will forward Mr_ Shipmari s letter to you and to Mr. Duffy as soon as it arrives. Thank you for your assistance in ttiis urgent matter. f FYI, Jonathan has been taking care of my trees at both my houses, including my own massive Willow, for at least 10 years, and is very familiar with the neighborhood. 14 From: tedwebbi te:r-aub;4-,OPlC,11Xe:1a: Subject: RE:Shamrock Tree Company review of tree Date- September 12,2020 at 10:34 AM To: Ellen McNeilly nc! Thanks. Sent from my Verizon,SamstM Galaxy smartphone ........Original message-------- From:Etten McNeilly 41% r5 bate;9/12/20 10:27(G 'to:Webb Edward Subject:Shamrock Tree Company review of tree Good morning,Ted- Jonathan Shipman,Shamrock Tree Company,came by just now in response to my pleas for his expert opinion. As u may kawiJ6niUmrt4s:ite-onLy'Moiter-Arbarist, �y',;erttfiiattoft,on the,;4orth Fork. He has taken care of many historic o6t ofYam'-'Road, h and U - a* PE; oa , t�rpqgh*, ft ond. He told me,and will write an email or Letter to me within the next day or two confirming his assessment,that,with proper care, that tree could easily Live another 50 yearsll ishandW after the 2016 iikoiM that da large Hollies providing a*016reak. _g I will forward Mr.Shipman's letter to you and to Mr.Duffy as soon as it arrives. Thank you for your assistance in this urgent matter. FYI,J6nat�Anlkas been iilafte.of my trees at both my houses,including my own massive Willow,for at least 10 years,and is very fAmtffar�*ith the noOtC&j6�g4. R A •+r 1. ! ' ''�.l���s� ..Yes �^t<a .t .::ti/ - x�. �f rl► � >t Z Alp a •-�" t ..'J-''i ria v: .,> ,.,'k A7". ..< - .;e „ •� 14., w:Fk- a..�a„� 4,"'*+�' i'"r �,<':�w'�.^•^.�,z6 NO- "R, `";Ek'��- Ty.-'�.�"y;�`}„'.r,�, t"''.r��w x *X -•-�,`; �`��a.h`��",�a.a-,P�`ar� Pw' „�-+. ..-r:',<,{•^""�`s �'"' '"may' 'r.'--"`'.' ': , �k"..x`.. ,' ..�ct` "`'�' '. FR` �'`'-ti-- .4�..'"�.. -�`"`, �.r� Irl -II', �`i f _r_. 9{�g-�.� e,�yr.��' � �-'�."'�i�;'-•, j'�,,.,�•w r ...C` �xv..�s..s�.w•.�r"��, .t x-� ..y-'riy" �,•w,>�,.7" ���, a���a�.•,. on.��''-r'�t` � ,r ..9.;.'.se,�.,s•. �;..,��, 7.<d;.-,>'^� r '*t- 41a.:-f,.-t*+ u.,3"�l` 's �«�� �„s 4 .,, `u.�"'t� y'G it � � = .. 4 t• s '� " y..` a;s e..�-^„,�`r"°.r ,^ ^`� .. ,,....,...�, e;,.. `r""'"'��'' �,aR'i. ,rr u..,,+ � '�"...,.'�"-r,�,,,-•�•• r V -'s�a.;.„"°"rk=C`�a s» �r �r't. �.� ' }..,P;��✓ -r'---. �`r�.�.ri� '� �,�.. �.�'-'�,"fir+ .: �t...�a€ .�,,, at if7Yi ftrJ•rT'" ��f•*.s.rt ro'3�.v�^e �ss r t � "".. Wyk "`&'�4�a`��' a,� :..x--ri`" L"`""��., �.,��.-ice•.=+.l..+�..&'3.�. � �7Ftii,.': g'yj:Yx } ^� ,.'g 1• �`y• i'+. s';.,w [^� yiv'�*'C�'�>„r�'er•`�g'Y' .r ^'� ifi� "i a x ,;..., �" .J .✓•�y° ..._„�-n.-� t...-..r "`h,,,,,�..��. ,. } .a,�,..�_.,....a�^- �1,�..�- � :,..�,� .t, .a.r•^.... ,,,,,. � t..+�, ""'-�_....-m»^� ��. y r.-��"* :..max MONS Y a'= `� a».�.�"k..•sz a "e„ "���"y`.Y.�"''�. ear x .d � ?` -) r,. x� .r >.<°^•� �" "� �"-�'° .'� .t _^x5' r'"`„'.y 4a?�'aV, .a'�'r"J" QV wra ! s "'" � �.^:�..,.._. �; .w is"�-... -�'. �..,, rx >q.`fes. •f"< ra'aw..r ' 't a», x�x--� & s r `moi ,bxtOLI1402 7 ; . z , T MIN _. ,� ,r �h�x s b•�.z ��rs. �r-'c " k'» �' � .? r Y '% €M,�4 Oytd�� Sh QW. w, Map wfa k s� �< t-t"� ": a t, till s 4 ;�, 3�` e - aw� a i ark�. 'l�i� -•,:,,�` x k,E, Y�.,. Yi � � as6:. � x k a " ..�� p � `� ♦ems 7�jrk � P�F.y+` )� r- N .: L * r iD From: blllgeselll @gmall.com Subject: SEATAULT96729 Date: April 2.20151:03:38 PM EDT To: <PeterD@town.southold.ny.us> 1 Attachment,44.4 KB Peter, I have been in contact with Damon and he suggested 1 contact you with my concerns. I own the property located at 20 Vincent SL,Orient.My property adjoins the Bertault property located at 95 Navy St. i Yesterday my neighbor informed me that a tree service company was in the process of removing two holly trees.The holly trees and the willow tree,For which Willow street is named,were topics of discussion at several Zoning Board and Landmark Preservation meetings last year.Mr Bertault stated that he would preserve the willow tree and relocate the holly trees.The drawings used to,get the building permit reflect this. Yesterday,my neighbor,asked the tree service representative,who was in the process of removing the holly trees,why he was removing the trees:My neighbor was Informed that Mr'Bertault was provided with a quote for relocating the holly trees and Mr Bertault decided that this was to expensive and the trees should be removed. My concern Is what will Mr Bertault do next.Doesn't he have an obligation to follow the plans the town approved? ; To be open with you 1 opposed Mr Bertaults request for a variance and relocation of barn forthe following,reasons. 1. 1 felt that relocating barn would change,the historic character of orient.The barn has been in its.current location since late 1800.Over 50 Orient residents agreed with me and they signed a statement to this effect which I submitted to the Landmark Preservation Committee. Bottom line is that the Landmark Commission approved relocation so this-issue s is closed, y 2.My property is a corner lot with limited,access to street.Relocating barn and providing access to Mr Bertauies property from Willow St.will restrict vehicular access to my property.If Mr Bertault parks a car at the end of his driveway I will not have vehicular access my proper.Mr Bertault said he would not do this but only time will tell. 3:The latest drawing I obtained show that-the relocated barn height will exceed code and will not comply with required } side yard set back.The Zoning Board of Appeals did not address these issues. The ZBA only addressed the relocated barn setback from Willow St.,which was the reason the Building Department originally rejected.permit.l might point s out that the plans approved by the ZBA are not the same plans used by the Landmark Preservation Commission.The major difference is the floor elevation of the relocated barn was raised from 7 to 8 ft.See attached for details.I had an architect review plans and she agreed with my concision that the maximum code height will be exceeded if foundation is raised to 8 ft. I request that you review plans and reach your own conclusions regarding height and side yard set back issues mentioned in 3 above.Please let me know what you conclude and what can be done to insure compliance with all applicable codes. I also do not understand why the Town feels a decision is valid when the information used by each group involved In the decision process is different. Thanks for your attention to this matter. Bill GesejP `73Z g16-91305= . Ani.«.�pAt4j4A t:sa T> 1 online Form Submittal:Town Code Complaint Form Oni March 10,2020 at 5:07 PM Town Code Complaint Form Please use this form to report alleged Town Code violations to Code Enforcement;; Such violations include but are not limited to noise, transient rentals, property ; maintenance, zoning or other issues. Be thorough in describing your concern and provide as much information as you can to assist us in resolving this issue expeditiously. New York State Committee on Freedorn_of Inforniation Law Open Government Violation Address: Street Number 95 Street Name Navy Street Southold Town Hamlet Orient i Closest Cross Street Willow Street Name oUOwner%Tenant,if Vincent Bertault ; known. Brief Description of Complaint Significant trenching being done, following perusal by septic in- staller to ascertain location of nearby wells.This complainant was given to understand that a well location for the barn was also to be determined; neither included on plans submitted with 5 application. Owner is alleged to have stated intent for barn to be used as a residential rental upon completion. What is the best time of day or Any time. day of the week to observe the Violation? Have any previous complaints Yes been made? If yes,when was the last date Field not completed. submitted. „ Is the location of the complaint Yes occupied by tite owner? Does this involve an alleged Field not completed. transient rental? If yes,which site is the rental Field not completed. listed on (if known). If Other, then please list here. Field not completed. I affirm that all information pro- Yes vided in this complaint is true fr and factual. } Your First Name Ellen Your Last Name McNeilly Address 70 Vincent Street, PO Box 314 City Orient State NY Zip 11957-0314 Phone Number 631-323-3989 Email Address ejmcneilly@earthlink.net Would you like to be contacted yes x about the complaint? Today's Date 3/10/2020 By submitting this Win, !affirm under penalty of perjury to the truth and accuracy of the statements contained herein. 1 understand that false statements made here- in are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law. p t Scott Russell, Supervisor Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 February 9,2017 Re: Violation of law and destruction of a historically preserved building at 95 Navy Street, Orient Dear Supervisor Russell:;, I write to seek your help in enforcing Town ordinances and the decisions,of the Zoning Board of Appeals,the Historic Preservation Commission and the Building Department in connection with a project that is in violation of all of them. The property at 95 Navy Street is part of the Historic District in Orient.Beginning around 2012, the owner of that property,Vincent Bertault, sought to relocate a barn that is protected under the Historic Preservation laws of Southold. Many in the immediate neighborhood opposed this project,concerned that the historic nature of the property was being compromised, and that the proposed changes were unnecessary and would create other burdens on neighboring property.Many of these neighbors submitted a petition seeking to have the proposed changes rejected. Despite these objections,the Zoning Board of Appeals decided to allow the moving of the barn, but specified conditions on the project,including conforming with the requirements of the Historic Preservation Commission,and the preservation of several holly trees and the historic willow tree that gave its name to the street bordering-this property. The Historic Preservation Commission also allowed the project to proceed,with the requirements of preserving the building in substantially the same form, and conforming to the criteria proposed in the plans submitted to the Zoning Board and the Commission. Despite the accommodations granted,the owner has failed to preserve the building, has destroyed two trees that he specifically agreed, and was ordered to protect, and has created a condition that now threatens to kill the massive historic willow tree, a defining fixture of this community. Despite his obligation to preserve the historic barn,the owner left a gaping hole in the roof of the structure for an extended period of time. That lead to serious water damage and compromise of the what remained of the structure.Because of the damage he caused, it appeared that the building was more difficult to move.Rather than reinforcing the structure before moving it intact,he stripped off the remaining roof,cut the,building into sections, and then moved those s- qcnc . nhe pinubC6rib adWAngPA buiildiiagttai�iill=uvu+ ia ;,iiiu'tdinht`lm forts,a t :b ;#li :; BA. After the move of the sections to the new foundation,the owner left the building without a roof, F further dawn-g%ng the remaining structure. The barn door had been knocked from its frame and la;ii'hai£in atid�ialrtstrtrival► t. ciie girt tle.untahed'anil uncv +d 3 iatlrip=,t Ging :o er ct apst::incl:ih ; idie: orcemMo. pa ridn placetl a. warning notice on the structure. Since then, sdin6 amm"..terb660added,butIhe-btW" & remains roofless and open to the elements. This the t*"'40 ru 611 Of this historic structure. '�-�piatrs submittert,anti,-"ed' *O ce,�t�a i rB ai ara`F ist.0001 es rvat vp. Commi cion fi quu�edst i p s # a ii +e pi w<a t t3 e;c± oca io�i;,of tOdImature holly trees(16 and 18 feet tall)io locations on either side of the willow.The repositioning of these•trees would thea provide wind buffers to the mature willow. The owner removed the holly trees, but destroyed tl;em rather than relocating them.When questioned about this,he responded that there were no local arborists who could do the work. When that was disputed,he said that he decided it would be too expensive to relocate them. } The failure to preserve these trees and relocate them may have played a significant role in the damage that the willow received in recent storms. One of the-branches that fell from the willow further damaged the already compromised barn structure.The willow,which gave Willow Street its name,now appears to be in danger of dying. While I and many of my neighbors opposed this project;we held out hope that the Town would at least ensure that the owner complied with the zoning and preservation requirements set down in the decisions that let him proceed. The opposite has happened. } Ther mer's nctior gird' ` a,tii:a A00 don rwv-Ot bu ling, ode;Zoning Board a�afstric pieand :. btiidiri�.pieserv�ati 'riilea. l��ii: t�� tiit• , The Town must take immediate action to ensure that • no further damage is done to the historic structure, • immediate steps are taken to secure and preserve the building, • it promptly be permanently restored in accordance with the rules of historic preservation, • the willow tree is txda# cl by an arborist to attempt to save it, • that replacement holly trees of a comparable size be obtained and planted as required under the approved plans. It is my understanding that the project may soon need an extension of its'building permit to proceed_ This should be granted only if there is immediate and substantial progress in meeting the above obligations.And it should be conditioned on swift completion of the overall restoration. 1 , Decision - ZBA # 6729 — April 17,. 2014 — Relocate Existing Barn and Shed k n 4 BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson � � ' 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 . Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantes OtcekLtcntiait; Gerard P.Goehrin er g sr+ �� Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Homing " "�► ,�y,d 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider ' "" Southold,NY 11971 F http://southoldtown.northfork.net }• ` R' 'f 5 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 la =7+ trr . FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF APRIL 17,2014 ZBA FILE:6729 NAME OF APPLICANT: Vincent Bertault PROPERTY LOCATION: 95 Navy Street(adj.to Willow Street)Orient,NY. CTM#1000-26-1-12.2 s SERiA IETI1IFA'l`ION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the,State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. 1:y', `I''11FI'E1R+Il +IA'I`1r?N The relief, permit, or interpretation requested in this application is listed under the Minor Actions exempt list and is not subject to review under Chapter 268. F ,I' T-Y."EAS /DFgCRI TION :The applicant's property is a 1-9,905 sq. ft. in the R-40 Zone.The northerly lot line measures 65.93 feet along Willow St., plus 54.53 feet along an adjacent residential parcel.The easterly lot line measures 154.15 feet along a residential parcel. The southerly lot line measures 103,57 feet along Navy St., and the westerly lot line measures 207.70 feet along another parcel. The property is improved with a single family dwelling, and two accessory structures (a barn and a shed), as shown with the existing, and the proposed, new accessory structure locations, on the survey drawn by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. dated Dec. 12. 2012, and the site plan A.1 drawn by Gary R.O'Connor,dated Oct. 18,2013. :BASIS.C} A?1IeATI4I. Request for Variance from Article III Section 280-15 and the Building Inspector's October l5,2013,Renewed January 24,2014 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for relocation of existing accessory barn and shed,at; 1)accessory barn and shed proposed in a location other than the code required rear yard. :RELIEF -RE+<UESTED; The applicant requests variances to move two accessory structures from existing nonconforming front yard locations, to a new nonconforming front yard location. The code requires all accessory structures,except in the case of waterfront parcels, be located in the rear yard. AI7DI+I'IC) AGIA'fTC3N.'-The applicant's property is a through lot with frontage on two streets, and therefore has two front yards and no rear yard. The subject barn is estimated to have been built at sometime in the 1920's, and the shed was also built at some time prior to the enactment of the Town Zoning Code. The applicant wishes to preserve and restore both accessory structures and to relocate them to eliminate the current need to drive cars over the existing septic system and to create more open space for gardening and recreation in the center of his property. The file contains two letters of objection submitted by an agent of adjacent neighbors stating some concerns regarding the applicant's proposed project. The neighbor's agent submitted written information on the history of the subject property.The applicant's proposed project is subject to the review and approval by the Town Page 2 ot3 April 17,2014 ZBAN6729—Bertault SUMN1000.26-1-12.2 Landmark Preservation Committee. The applicant submitted a letter dated March 13, 2014 proposing to relocate the barn with a 25 foot front yard setback from Willow Street instead of the 20 feet setback as originally proposed. FINDINYGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BQARRD ACTION. The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on March 6, 2014,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal'inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1i_QJML.Jk. Grant of the variances to relocate two accessory structures,an existing,historic barn and shed from pre-existing, non-conforming front yard areas into new, non-conforming front yard locations will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant's property is located in an historic district that includes numerous buildings, including both principal dwellings and accessory structures, with non-conforming setbacks; all situated in locations that pre-date zoning. Many accessory structures are located in front yard areas.The average building front yard setback on Willow St. is estimated to be approximately +4 feet. The. average front yard setback on Navy St. is estimated to be approximately+17 feet. The applicant proposes to re-locate the barn with a front yard setback from Willow Street of 25 feet and the shed with a front yard setback of 39.6 feet, and a,15 foot side yard setback on this irregularly shaped lot. The subject structures have valid pre-existing CO's,and the applicant's project must have the approval of the Town Landmark Preservation Committee. 2. %i*Ji,.l€: tvi!` Z6'�=lfi'3% .The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The applicant's property is located between two streets, creating two front yards and the parcel has no conforming rear yard area. Therefore,the re-location-of the two pre- existing accessory buildings to any other on-site location requires the granting of variances. 3. "fir`"rwv'° 67 '; The variances granted herein are mathematically substantia(, representing 100% relief from the code for the accessory structures proposed front yard locations, instead of code required rear yards_ locations. However, this is mitigated by the fact that these two structures already exist in non-conforming front yards because this property has two front yards and no rear yard location in which to move the structures,and also because of the pre-existing non-conforming status of these two structures each with a valid CO. 4. 'T,0*ii'li*1267 11jr 3 M(4,:0-0 evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. 5.;�'own;IGawZ;6 �ii3�,% Il:, The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel in 2005, affer the Zoning Codervwas in effect, and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6. 'T°civYA'Law ti 67-1y: Grant of the variances is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of moving two pre-existing, non-conforming accessory structures to new non- conforming locations,while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Horning, seconded by Member Goehringer,and duly carried, to GRANT,the variance for the shed as applied for and shown on the survey drawn by Peconic Surveyors,P.C.dated Dec. 12.2012,and the site plan A.I drawn by Gary R. O'Connor,dated Oct. 18,2013,and Page 3 of 3 April 17.2014 13A#6729—Bertault SCTM#1000-26-1-12.2 DENY,the variance request for the barn as applied and, GRANT ALTERNATIVE RELIEF. for a 25 foot setback from Willow Street for the accessory barn relocation,as proposed by the,applicant in a letter dated March 13,2014,subject to the following condition; CONDITION: 1. The granting-of the variances are contingent upon the applicant securing the approval by the Town Landmark Preservation Committee for the proposed project, if the application is denied by the Landmark Preservation,Committee then this decision shall become null and void. That the above conditions be written into the'Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. ivgeTanulr> i; or nrtl!' �; er � the applicant or.agent must submit to the Board of Appeals for approval and filing, two sets of the final site plan or survey conforming to the alternative relief granted herein..The ZBA will forward one set of approved, stamped drawings to the Building Department.Failure to follow this procedure may result in the delay or denial of a'buildiY,tpermit,and may require a new application and public hearing before the ' Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result In delays and/or a possible denial by-the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings,site plan and/or survey cited above, such as 'alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future' ,use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, 'other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this-action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is'de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity.- Vote of the Board.• Ayes: Members Weisman(Chairperson), Schneider,horning, Goehringer, Dames. This Resolution was duly adopted(5-0). C�6LL �lr7�_ Leslie Kanes`Weistiian,Chairperson` Approved for filing 144 /2014 Gary R. O'Connor-Architect,LLC 8Coryell Street Lambertville,New Jersey 08530,609-397-3635 March 13,2014 "F INALA ' F N� __V �R�E RE Zoning Board of Appeals- _, ,- VIEWEI) i'S V,,x-- , � - - - Town of Southold bE r I Town Hall AnnexPAT ?1':1450, 171, 53095 Main Road 1 Southold,NY 11971 Re: -46729-Bertault Residence Accessory Building Relocation (VIA EMAIL and US,MAIL) Dear Chairperson Weisman and Board, Mr. Bertault and-I have received and reviewed testimony (pages 26-32 of 33) from the J, and J.Woodhouse#5218 Sub-Division hearing as forwarded from the office of Patricia C.Moore. We respectfully fail to see the relevance of this testimony as it pertains to our particular case. We understand-there.is concern for-the well-being of all existing structures on this property. As per the testimony at the hearing,Mr. Bertault shared his vision of restoring the barn to its original integrity and character. "h is not uncommon in preservation,history for older structures to be repurposed and/or relocated. As such, you can see on the website of The Oyster Point Historical, Society, the stories-of several buildings which have been relocated for various reasons over the years. In refdrence to Ms.Moore's letter of March 5,.2014,we would like to comment as follows: I Comment: Setback variance from a"front yard"which requires a minimum of 35' when 20' is requested. Response: It was reviewed during the hearing that the survey indicates an average setback of buildings 'along Willow Street to be 4.1' where we provide, 20' which we believe to be a reasonable distance given the location of similar structures in the neighborhood. 2. Comment: Accessory Building Exceeds maximum size permitted of 660 S.F. and exceeds 18' in height. The barn is 850 S.F.and the height is not provided. Response: The barn is a pre-existing non-conforming structure. The height of the building appears in two locations. On Drawing A-1, under Zoning Computations the Existing and proposed height is indicated. Additionally, on Drawing A-3 the height is indicated on the Building Elevations. 3. Comment: The Flood Zone may affect the height of the existing structure. The Flood Zone is AE 6 which requires the finished flood elevation to be a minimum of 8'. It is not clear what the owner intends to do with the relocated structure and at what height the foundation will be built. 40 Zoning Board of Appeals 1� March 13,2014 Page 2 of 2 Response: As discussed during the hearing,the barn shall be used to house a vehicle and maritime equipment. The proposed finish floor elevation is 7' where it is presently b.l'. While 7' conforms to FEMA regulations,it does not conform to local regulation requiring (2)foot of freeboard. It is my understanding following a conversation this week with Mr. Michael Verity of the Building Department that a 7' floor elevation would be permissible provided the building walls received flood vents. Mr. Bertault prefers not to have flood j vents on the barn walls,and would prefer to amend the proposed finish floor elevation to 8'. In doing so, we also propose the adjustment of the street line setback to be a more favorable 25' in lieu of 20' originally submitted. The adjusted barn height will be 18'-9" above finish grade to-the ridge for the elevation facing Willow Street.The top plate of the barn side wall is an average 13.9' from grade as grade_varies from east to west. In closing, I would like to reiterate that the rational to relocate the barn resides with the Owner's stated goal of restoring the barn, eliminating vehicular traffic adjacent to the house/across the septic system and for the'simple pleasure of creating quality open space in the center of the property for gardening and the Owners enjoyment. x f We trust the,Board finds this request for relief to be just and`reasonable. Sincerely, Gary R. O'Connor,AIA Architect Cc: File Mr. Vincent Bertault,Homeowner P L mA_P' RETE 6A B i, 2 . SEE ,�,� I� E, , , DATED' 11: 11�. Gary R.O'Connor PROPOSED BUILDING RELOCATION AKWE� .02 f1aM I,Ilo15Lreet �` :�', �s.tcrt..o�fuoas�p ? , for the ter,sissy • f ' BERTAULT RESIDENCE pROIEcrDAT'A � aW dllme., wv 95 NAVY STREET,ORIENT,NY 11957 Im.v. n�T.wrMnm Iprk+.;•'r{R>•s}Wil{dulAWLwm„u ABBREVIATIONS ARCHITECTURAL LEGEND a;M�a.tl Naor N4po,M AREA= 19„905 SQ.FT � t�ELr ; WILLO W 15 S,TREEF wmlclu.c v,.�oal"'i.®aiu rlmilwa ".�:m.”' �N.,.. " �_o�,'p..- �� w�e�mmr.ou �vY• rtk" __ .'',f'�• � +• tl �ft t -•. C` �+-1 M°rx•` .arooT,ww - `R'"' 'b `'"z` o +• ZONING COMPUTATIONS _ :� IIS: m �./®.,>ar�f �. ''"' �r•' o�: .pG u� m wM.a.�a' u •�tll ` -"!�� �,�, v "w m u �au u wouc,� Q w.m.nlpo. x r"., a?�A..' A. namcrauea.mm,w..w+rt.uwamm�s R N.9'S6'UU"c' Sa,53' vQf.¢YN ,_rai... ti ti Sri 'iaA•+1 �\ �, AFv`x! '�C:N9"SraWCEK ' lA1i.`�. Z; _ r. aeca + H) u...,uNumnQ - �y Nj '&5• mr num % un+ .�nouml , •naunuanenaruuNrummualmm.n i pp ''A f n�. ••` r NN Q KN mgfIX.m \J 30�, 33 ,Mb IWI N[\ IbV IIv11V el Iiso SHEET INDEX KL •.- v ,iC> r�+iM ,ja[ /� xvCleb T.vlpY qs N N+.• ',� pwr l t LLvv.IDwulS Tm � f ' ,."'. � 14)�•_ '" �i,+� '�ir '_—"i_'. m40Mfm r=� ,�,E,� +vryi�n:. -� �t tl•[w1aE�N" if'-���r�[5�4;�I`l?.5r, l�piz�5' ti munm.rwlawrA m' �'r'' ":1. ri„ w.tc� 'r, �•a'w+`, i�--.�--y--�f .9 I r. �1= �veM 1' ., ur�tlol/rlomua 3, urao �`S at j N .o d =i! .".al.. p. ,■,,••. P :�:�'ri7iit��' 4 m ai av .� � ''^eJ..w � `w.+"-' I mon..lm `� ,' `•^•'!;�8�: � `SEED ti' a txsv 7r ,r3cnt9NAM AA 1 eiml Ali.. IRw. � 't4n^t`"`Mtm"w.•.r ywF,w.. ,vo,wr .an,amo yy � ,,. . s: .v , �' ��' Ir:»da.ruin, , o.-r rtraw�r �wTe' O per,. N m Wui�mfu pY pa•,TY vT tHA 1p �' In - ira 13 E .. a.,..... trj Zk IwIy..+a..� •, ° ow .lan y " " Ii1,wr1n uI t4', 4.r4% �.�." IIlJLd ® 1- ', '�` * ,: i : 33•iRCE u .a, r�e*,���+..•• a �' Cn 3i r''' tz6.23' ,y''*., "•� naewku�°' w• `w�s„;,w�.pi b `€"`� gp2T FE.`,` , {�.,�„) � � �h•3.4 am�ilne�P9Mm4ME+%+aW .2 06M - p, 'ear" "�". �� �w ai*,r•�,,.„`sEwa M6 ?'.J C=1 582'a197'+.2�'}= C EL LE7_1R s �Rd B d1+wcnnoN fl larcaca ttE ap NAVY ort, .4 WMAR4iFWAW wt. A: TIIIEptd,Rl[IV1LtpODaT. ttm1,C5ViKtOrS,fL J i.51 if n ww aay,p 5DUr4NY 1191 ax A.1 �` snE PUNwuuw-to =8..�..-.--• PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Tel:(631)765-4330 Fax:(631)7654643 March-5, 2014 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex 53095,Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re:Vincent Bertault#6729 Dear Chairperson Weisman and Board: Irepresent William Gesell and his family, they are an.adjacent property owner and would be adversely impacted by the relocation of-the barn to Willow Street. They oppose this application. In my review of the application the following Variances are re4uired'but'have not been included in this application: (1) Setback variance from a "front yard"which requires a minimum of 35'when 20'is requested. (2)Accessory Building exceeds maximum size permitted of 660 sf. ft, and exceeds 18' m. in height. The barn is 850 sq.ft and the heigh is not provided. (3),The,Flood Zone may affect the height of the existing structure. The Flood Zone is AE 6 which will require the finished flood elevation to be a minimum of 8'. It is not clear what the owner intends to do with the relocated structure and at what height the foundation will be built. The property was previously owned by Mr. And Mrs. Woodhouse who obtained area variances to subdivide this and the adjacent parcel on Bay Avenue and Navy Street. Attached are the transcripts of the Zoning Board hearing, appeal #5218 of 2003. There was impassioned testimony at the hearing on the historic nature of the property and the existing structures. The subdivision supported the owners desire to maintain the existing historic barn which was built between 1906 and 1920. s. The subdivision was supported by the neighbors because it preserved the integrity of the existing structures. The location of the structures is as important to the preservation of Orient Village as the structures themselves. Moreover, moving the barn could compromise the structural integrity of the existing structure, The applicant's reason to relocate the barn is not rational. it is much less expensive to place "traffic bearing"covers on the existing sanitary system then to < relocate the barn. Finally, the notice of disapproval was revised to include approval of the Landmark Preservation Commission. This hearing should be postponed until'thp Landmark Preservation Commission reviews this application. This application needs a coordinated review. It is unlikely that the Landmark Preservation Commission will approve this application. Relocation of the barn should be denied. <n , .cfa C. Moore i i encls. F Y { n r r ' , Patricia C. Moore , f Attorney at Law i;C�rIV`'!; 5I020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 MAR 21 2014 Tel:(631)7654330 Fax:(63 l)7654643 i Ul 4 x March 21, 2014 k Ms.Leslie Weisman, Chair and Members of the Southold Town Zoning Board Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals ' PO,Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 s Re: Appeal 46729/Vincent Bertault E Dear Chair Weisman and Board Members: s f Please accept these written comments into the record in the above-referenced appeal. Objections and Concerns: z k Relocation of the barn is unnecessary. The frame barn in its existing location can serve { as a garage using access to Navy Street. A pervious driveway and/or sanitary covers over the existing septic system make the requested variances unnecessary. The applicant's objective[refurbishment and use of existing barn] can be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Relocation of barn is detrimental to character of neighborhood and neighboring property. Enclosed please find Google Earth photographs of the subject property and surrounding area.' Vincent and Willow Streets are quiet, tree lined residential properties. The applicant's property abutting Willow Street is wooded. The relocation of the barn and placement of a driveway on Willow Street as proposed is unsafe. The Gesell's existing driveway is located on a curve. The proposed location of the barn and driveway would create conflicting access of the two driveways on the curved road. There is no reason to knowingly and intentionally create such an unsafe condition. Nonconforming Structure cannot be altered without creating new non-conformity. The frame barn is already a non-conforming structure. It exceeds 660 square feet. The ' Exhibit I [aerial photos of Willow Street and Vincent Street] Exhibit 2 [Gesell house and driveway showing applicant's barn in present location 82 feet from Willow Street Patricia C. Moore Attorney at Law MAR 21 2014 March 21, 2014 OF APPEALS Re: Appeal#6729 Bertault k proposed relocation of the structure necessitates variances. Section 280-122(A)prohibits the alteration of a non-conforming structure if such alteration creates new or increased non-conformity. The application to relocate the non-conforming barn is prohibited by this section of the Town Code because the applicant seeks a front yard variance which ` constitutes a new non-conformity with the Code. Accessory structure in front yard requires 35 foot setback. The proposed re-location of the barn at 20 feee in the front yard violates the 35 foot setback requirement for front yard structures. The applicant cannot use,average setbacks of principal structures within 300 feet to justify location of the accessory structure. * Height of Relocated Barn violates height requirements. The applicant has suggested to relocate the barn with a 25 feet setback with an"adjusted barn height" of 18 ft. 9 inches above "finish grade to the ridge" As stated above,the setback requirement is 35 feet and ` the proposed height violates the zoning code height limitations. Building height is defined and measured from the "natural grade" [Southold Town Code§280-4] not,as proposed by the applicant above a"finished" grade. ' Application fails to meet legal standards to justify variance. r New York Town Law§276-b(3)(b)set forth the criteria the Board must consider before granting an area variance. The applicant has not satisfied these criteria. The applicant's stated rationale'for the variance is [1] restore the barn; [2] eliminate vehicular traffic adjacent to applicant's home/across the septic system and [31 simple pleasure of ` creating quality open space in the center of the property for the Owner's enjoyment. Respectfully,the stated rationale does not satisfy the legal criteria to justify issuance of the requested and necessary variances. The barn can be restored in its present location without variances. The applicant should not transfer his own vehicular traffic and the impacts associated with it upon the adjoining property owner. And owner enjoyment does not justify altering the character of s By letter dated March 13,2014, the applicant's architect has amended the proposed setback to 25 feet which still violates the required 35 foot setback in the Code. 'Letter of Gary R. O'Connor, AIA dated March 13,2014. Patricia C. Moore Attomey at Law March 21,2014 Re:Appeal#6729 Bertault x the existing neighborhood, imposing the burden of a non-conforming structure in a non- conforming location on the property on the neighbor simply for the owner's"enjoyment. It is respectfully requested that the Board deny the requested variances. Sincerel ;Y -= atrcia C. Moore PCM/mr T'' �iII'� z. cc: William Gesell Zlz14, -S CO NAME DATE DP# TYPE ADDRESS HAM R SHIDELER,S 1/19/17 41296-Z WINDOW 175 LAUREL AVE 50 R CORITSIDIS,G 1/19/17 41297-Z ADDS/ALTS 265 ORCHARD LA SO , R HAUSER FAMILY " 1/19111 ' '41298-Z 'ND '1130 STROHSON RD 'Cu R PRAETORIUS,R 1/19/17 41299-Z ND 975 WESTVIEW DR MA R ,AKSELRAD,I 1/20/17 , 41300-Z- ADDSIALTS� --4125 4125 MASS PT RD 'CU-"— _ Y R CLARK,S 1/20/17; 41301-Z ELECTRIC 4845 S HARBOR RD i SO R FEENEY,S 1/23/17 41302-Z ISP 2940 WELLS AVE' SO R FROEHLICH `1/23/17 41303-Z ACCY GAR 6130 PEC BAY BLV LA R SINHA,H " ' ,1123/17 41304-Z SOLAR 195 NINTH ST 1 GR ' `R- SHALKRY,J " _ 1123/17 ' `41305-Z ND2361INDA111) 1NA R KLODNICKI 1/23/17 41306-Z ELECTRIC , 1415 HARBOR LA CU R - PECONIC LANDING 1/23/1-7 ' 41307-Z-;;,GENERATOR f1205 ROUTE.25 SO' _ R FUHRMANN,B 1/23/17' 41308-Z i GENERATOR 2620 ORCHARD ST a OR - - RT DELLAQUIL9,G - "" `I/23/17' 41309=Z` 'ALTER'-"- `4725 NEW SUFF AVE` MA'--" ( 'R KAPP,H ]124117 -41310-ZINT ALTER 1305 THIRD ST NS R FICNER,S 1/24/17 ' 41311-Z .ALTERS 7990 OREGON RD Cu j R FUJITA,D 1/24/17 41312-Z` ISP 1`655 PARK WAY SO (' R MCPIKE,K 1/24/17 ' 41313-Z ISP 795 GRANDVIEW DR OR i -R " ; S�ICEGGS,F - ' _ 1124117 ;4131,4-Z HOT TUB ]2990 SOUNDVIEW AV SO� R TINTLE,C 1/24/17 41315-Z 'j ,ALTS/ADDS 1235 LUPTON PT RD MA R_,_" -YOUNG,D ` " _ 1/25/17 , 413164 ADDSIALTS m` -OFF EAST ENDV RD FI R DEXTER,D 1/25/11 41317=2 WINDOW— o, , ]MONTAUK AVE FI C GOBIL LLC l%25/17 41318-Z E WIRELESS '415 ELIJAH3 LA MA R' OLIVER,K 1/25/17 41319-Z -INT ALTER 1255 BA'Y SHORE RD -GR R LADUCA,R 1/26/17 , 41320-Z ; DECK 685 GREENWAY W E OR R RODRIQUEZ - 1/26/17 ' 41321--Z7,'ELECTRIC - r'1338 R 48 OR-- R CASHWELL,J 1/26/17 41322-Z ELECTRIC 515 HARBOR LIGHTS SO R .. LOVE,]P 1/27/17 41323-Z ISP - 920 CEDARFIELDS DR ` ` GR R BOYLE,J 1/27/17 41324-Z BARN 24435 RTE 25 OR R HICKEY,D 1/27/17 41325=Z'_ '_XI ERS 175 CLEARWATER LA CU R GIACONE, W 1/27/17 41326-Z DEMO/ND 1130 LITTLE PEC BAY CU R` KOUTAVAS,P 1/27/17 41327=Z FIRE REPAIRS' =2980 PECONIC LA- PE__ R BERTAULT,V 1/30/17 41328-Z MOVE,BARN 95 NAVY ST OR R ;DEMCHAK,A 1/30/17 41329-Z -ISP 900 THERESA DR MA R HARTE, E 1/30/17 41330-Z DECK 1980 STARS RD EM R MAZZE LLA,S 1/30/17 41331-Z ADDS/ALTS ' 90 SHORE LA PE R FULLER,G 1/30/17 41332-Z GENERATOR •545 SOUTH LA EM R POLASHOCK,J 1/31/17 41333-Z ND 2625 JACKSON ST NS CO NAME DATE BPH TYPE ADDRESS HAM R -PAGE,D 919114 39165-Z ND 1654 N BAYVIEW`RD SO - R MACNISH,E 9/9/14 39166-Z SHED 35995 RTE 25 CU R - SAVARESE _ `9/10%14 39167-Z° NEWFOUND— 2575 OLD ORCHARD -EM', R MUELLER, 9/10/14 39168-Z ELECTRIC 990 GRAND AVE 'TMA ` C CRESCENT BEACH 9/11/14 39169-Z. ACCY GAR 1985 MAPLE LA MA C `GOBIL 9/11/14 39170-1 INT ALTER-' 19625 RTE 25 1VIA R SANTOS,A 9/11/14 39171-Z ACCY APT 933 NORTH SEA RD CU R BERGMANN 9/11/14 39172-Z ADD - 26915 CR 48 TCU R LANDMARK PROP 9/11/14 39173-Z ISP 380 WELLS RD LA 'C PERSEVERA-PROP' 9/11/14 39174-Z FIRE SUPP 170LOVE'LA MA R SZYMCZAK 9/12/14 .39175-Z DEMO DWLG �! 3500 GRATHWOHL ; NS R MCGOEY;D 9/12/14 3§176-Z ADDSIALTS -_ 1050 OAK`AVE_ SO R BAMBRICK 9/12/14 39177-Z ALTER 1655 LAKE DR SO R` `HARMON,J 9112/14 391.78-Z INT ALT1175 CEDAR PT DR SO PHINNEY,-J 9/15/14--39179-Z DEER FENCE 12975 MAII'BAYVIEW so--- - R O -R GOGGINS,WM '9115114 '39180-Z ACCY APT 1780 JACKSON ST NS R CORRELL,C LL9115114 S9181-Z. TSP- 350 STIRLING WOODS, j SO R BUTKOVICH 9/15/14 39182-Z ALTER 75 DEER RUM j SO t 'R R PELLEG_RINI 9/15/14' 39183-Z 'AI;TS/ADDS ry 4515 STILLWATER E F CU- - F R MANGINI 9/15/14 39184-Z DEMO BARN 12935 RTE 25 EM R PATANE A 9/i5/14- '39185-Z_'ND' - '4430 THE LONG WAY EM R BERTAULT 9/15/14 .391864, MOVE BARN ( 95 NAVY ST 'OR 'R MANGINI,M _ 9/16/14 139187-Z 'ALTER ? 12935 RTE 25 EM R SOUTHOLD LLC 9/16/14 39188-Z �HOT TUB 2350-CLEARVIEW — ', -SO C SKUNK&MAIN 9116/14 39189-Z ALTERS 55 SKUNK LA CU C PECONIC LAND 9/17/14 39190-Z TENNIS CTS 1205 RTE-25 GR C T/O SOUTHOLD 9/17/14 39191-Z STG BLDG 165 PECONIC LA PE _R CHHSOLM'_ 9/17/14 39192-Z ADD 4170 PEC'BAY BLV" _m X LA R NARDO;M 9/17/14 39193-Z ISP. 470,MOOSE TRAIL CU NOT USED 39194-Z NOT USED NOT USED R PAD FAM 9/18/14 39195-Z 'ND 530 SOUND BCH DR MA R MASTRO,E 9/18/14 39196-Z ND 1595 BAYVEW AVE GR R BEARD 9/18/14 39197-Z. ISP PVTE RD FI R ZANG 9/18/14 39198-Z DEMO/ND 370 TAKOPOSHA RD SO R BREEZY SHORES 9/19/14 39199-Z ALTERS 65410 RTE 25 GR R MCCARRICK,T 9/22/14 39200-Z PORCH 295 OSSEO AV- SO R FREED,T 9/22/14 39201-Z ND 12400 NEW SUFF AVE CU R GOOSE ISLAND 9/23/14 39202-Z ELECTRIC CENTRAL AVE FI CO NAME RATE BP# TYPE ADDRESS HAM R PORT,`G 9/16/19 44167—Z DECK 1015 SOUND DR GR R PORT,G 9116/19 44168-Z ISP 1015 SOUND DR GR R FRANCO,E . '9/16/19 44169-Z ,ADDS/ALTS 15919 ROUTE 25 V 3 EM R TUMMINELLI,E -9/16/19 44170-Z ' ACCY APT. `310 BAILEY9CH AD Nt R `MURPHY,IG1 9/16/19 44171-Z ELECTRIC ;225 HORTONS LANE SO 7F' 7gBbRE,D 9/16/19 44172-Z DEMO ISP 24806 ROUTE 25 - OR R"" MARKEY,L 9/16/19 44173-Z HOT TUB 610 RICHMOND RD "SO RMONFORT,D 9/16/19 44174-Z , ADDSIALTS 7010 HIAWATHAS PA SO ,'R ISLE OF CEDARS 9/17/19 + 44175-Z E ADDS/ALTS 2450 PETERS NECK RD OR M R AGRUSA,`I 9117/19. a 44176-Z$ ADDS/ALTS 275 MAJORS PATH SO C PIRATES COVE A9ARINE` 9/17/19 44177=Z ' ELECTRIC 'PENINSULA RD FI R °E KUBETZ,J " 9f17119 44178-Z SOLAR PANELS 1600'N OAKWOOD DR L'A 9 •R /17/19 44179-Z ` ISP 1665`MILLOAD MA R 9/18/19 44180-Z ` SOLAR PANELS' 2015,`PINE NECK RD SO _ _ t R `` '-JOHNSTON,M` 9/18/19 "'44181-Z ELECTRIC 235 BRIDGE ST GR R ' PEYTON,E 9/18/19 44182—Z' ISP �-3701vIUNN LANE �, OR JOHNSON,D 9/18/19 ,44183-ZSHE OFF EAST END RD- FI R FOUR WINDS FI 4/18/19 44184=Z-'ISP HALSYON AVE FI R ARCO,E` - .9/18119 44185-2;� ,ADDS/ALTS 1300 BR'OADWATERS CU R COOPER FAMILY ;911$119 44186-Z ! DECK 4140 BREAKWATER RD E MA R NICIIOLSON,B ' 9/18/19 ; 44187Z t _ISP 360 FLINT-STREET GR R MURPHY,R =9/18/19 44188-Z,=, HVAC 21695SOUNDVII WAVE SO R C 'HILL,T- � 9/18/19 -44189-Z ' ADDS/ALTS' 835 MARRATOOKA MA FOYLE;L 9118/19 44190-Z ALTERS , ORIENTAL AVE FI R P-ACQUADIO,P 9/19/19 44191-Z ISP 1045-TASKER LANE EN� R RIMOR DEV LLC 9/20119 44192-Z TENNIS COURT 51 MILLSTONE LANE C KIMOGEINOR POINT 9/20/19 -44193-Z REPAIRS 50 JACKSON ST R DORF,E 9/20/19 '44194-Z ADDS/ALTS 620 NORTH DR MA R BRUDIE,D -'9/20/19 44195-Z DECK 900 N SEAbRIVE OR R -MANCAN, M 9/20/19 44196-Z ADDS/ALTS 350 BLUE MARLIN DR GR R �fA: lricrrcr 9/23'/19 44197-Z ELECTRIC 4200 DEPOT LANE CU R BERTAU LT,V 9/23/19 44198-Z MOVE ACCY 95 NAVY STREET OR R KOCKOUDAKIS 9/23/19 44199-Z ACCY GARAGE 955 INLET LANE MA ;C 80 LOVE LANE ASSOC 9/23/19 44200-Z FIRE REPAIRS 80 LOVE LANE , MA R KERRONKOHL 9/23/19 44201-Z HOT TUB 65 PLEASANT PLACE -SO Decision - ZBA # 5218 — May 22, 2003 — Subdivision by Prior Owner E E } S APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Lydia A.Tortoni,Chairwoman 53095 Mala Road Gerard F.Goahringir P.O.Box 1179 George Homing Somhold,New York 11971-0959 Ruth D.Oliva ZBA Fax(631)765-9064 J Vincent Orlando Telephone(631)765-1809 - 0 bttp-./IsouLboldtown.nortbfoi-k.net li6A=OFAWFAXs RECEIVED to,440 so,M, olIJJ� MEMBER I AlIONSAND I DEVRMINAT16M, AWY '4'pL Na.,afo'-t0J JN A' M,- 'YNWdl 'D "'Ott, 5Pq** cWi 94,4* 1 - YAJrtO� ab,� CTW 0W0- - -12 e S-WRA be77M The Zoning ha"sbbd the pfbo - 11 1 .i*'6ri4er I 'popoo ' 43, ijs under. sl, In,thl%�,,40110itlon and category of the State's List of Actions,without,W,,;,V d-p"-p1W,,)b0 the if the project is Implemented as planned. q PKOPERYYJ*�s-� JPT46N: T,liNfit Pmorty,W ,2,1 64,s�qift _4,: _ , � ;b 4 p 10 a OTA, fiest'0471.3i'66 f4�t; ealiNcle, -OwL -"JiJo ity dho0se and accessory kar-he garage on wthe ' frame house and accessory frame e'Oy Paw �and *"Iwy p prepared 9-22-98,revised 11-04-02 Building 06061imerits August 15, 2002 No#t 6 of D160'pprdyalliar—dod,116tir 16,26O� i0becember 24,2002.citing SoWdq100- ,30k',W ltsdenl mf* 'W, -90 -1110h� The' d', A _4 04 .9, ca :1re6soWsteb In ft .0 !,:,tMcau*,JfiB rig noted in the previous dlsapprovals: ` FINDINGS OF FACT ARRA,VAf 11ANC—P-FfSL49F_kFzi-bur;kirl4Dr- cat of- M!" �2 id width'o 'W6hg,N4,W 'elf' 'Street. of 19,904 sq-t a'ntflot width 71 the applicants -ant6ned an ADDITIONAL n, Ap41 3; for ie a rninoriub&1sIon ap Page 2—April 17,2003 ,APP,1.No.5218—J.and J.Woodhouse '26-i-12 at Orient suE mit art ........ ...... 01,-thiCtftfs Of ld�*Ony,presented, materials llftj the Wojrd' T*s findings: J: GfraRi of elf ar#a` j nce, jjA0 A_A P 7ri 'or A PZ 'Inff pro "10 dslasity ot'= OC as,l re.qu e rel fi' cThonfbrmlng,,, f°_aV r"nested is du6i*ital. A0ftURfi'_*0 lot sizes are less than r-16 than lots,etasDttsg in ih0*4hbDdidod. A, NixeW'"40 h We 'Wavagest'Quilherp -8 -" wig –0— Mop-do-'Idt 'v 7* o35. a _*,qQqged difficulty for-the applicants litelf-created, since the applicants seek 10 M806166 I and 2 with nonconforming lot S14,03," Ai I'WMJ0#Mm necftsajy�fiv, one tbr'- le rid U,�;ap M- emoy 0 111c#i Pli ts,,tov, 4�satria 6" eilsi Rtii no fiberhood M all oifjhqabOV Ltors-grjd - 'I ing the app y YM 44W ndifLI' '� by'- 'Ll 'i 'balA :1 r bft �st IW ar N mo pman Page 3—April 17,2003 ` o (� Appl.No.521a—J.and J.Woodhouse � .26-1-12 at Orient 1 Tortora,seconded by Member Goehringer,and duly carried,to ,GFtA ,IT tho.Varia4ces.3n i ls;PrvwedrrInrtr stibdtviston,W shdwi�,on the map , prepaC®�i;by`John b.�Wrs,L.B:Ydatedd9= 99,atrteiidi�d'1 t�4=C3 ., 'Thls a3ction.dc ss or fti#ilr�'t#s�,s ck orOw f�i#t?+e'of s` tbjdct�+r +l#r l tf►ay�tvtate=#i antng:t ax oih8r, ri'such uss , setbacks;aril;ottaFfftrres,aar ;spressty:addissiei in�.l`ttts t€ira. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Tortora (Chairwoman), pGoehringer, Horning, and Orlando. (Absent was Member Oliva.) This Resolution',' ted(40). 'Gy, attoia�= (rWoi7t"40, `A F,tcirred-for Filing 51; .103 s t Authorized Signature CC:file,Z.B.A. [17_woxmjrvam� .. tipfrFkpi�N3411,�eQ C.� _ _ .�Mh1''•r�PRca�+G�.��BOUNDAr.�'11i�E. - -.,. ,.; . _ , .. � -- ,TZM'CF " Street `•� o�*+ ?�?a' oXt y = e•z �. t °i, 52.A`w i'..65.g3' �:.� Q s = . ,r_ •t 5f1FJ tltK: x -� 1DGR=zc,.�ir, rnx! ,'� 00 0 �`�`' �•,',aG��,C`+l �47d ' Hall a sopLIL bLOWM uPW OH^ Y :ice ? 1• LOT 2 LOT l � 13 ` 'N, 1 y -' 9 F4 lf2'5t-9 1 i b`s' yrAt9 O i?z ,`, }, ;soot� >. ^ 2• ,FFOUND �..+1' ' '4 • :sablID yj cr t-ccm1HEPC•.E A , ` . • �V avY 1J a.., " !, AR-A s 47J54 5F DR OR7 ACAE9 %e..,rG.... +�,.� E DEED.L IM.Z5 P.547 tom""•" _ .v - . +.w•.y'.•r�,^,,J, _ .«r C-PAPHIC,SCALE D1S7ANCES SHOWN SUCH-16& 7OFLY C.EHLERS LAND SURVEYOR 6E=KAWSMM it My-&=No x i F Suffolk County Department of Health Services — Division of Environmental Quality Letter r November 18, 2004 { i f a f 1 I • SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALT RVICE DIVISION OF ENVIROnfENTAL QUALITY BOARD OF REVIEW ARTICLE 2, SECTION 220, SUFFOLK COUNTY SANITARY CODE To: Brian L. Harper,M.D.,M.P.H.,Commissioner 1 From: Stephen A.Costa,P.E.,Chairman,Board of Review Subject: Findings and Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: S 10-02-0014— Woodhouse Residence,s/e/c Bay Avenue,alta: Village Lane, and Navy Street,Orient—tlo Southold—SCTM: 1000 02600 0100 012000 Hearing Date: November 18,2004 a 'i�itearte�tf:rif'Erisiil'etrri, - 'Parcels served by individual sewage systems and private drinking water wells in Groundwater Management Zone 4 must have a minimum lot area of 40,000 square feet in accordance with Article 6, §760-606, paragraphs A.5 and C.] of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. The applicant is proposing lot sizes less than 40,000 square feet. s Construction standards require that the distance between sanitary systems and shallow private wells be at least 150 feet. The applicant is proposing a subdivision with existing conditions where the sanitary system is less than 150 feet from a private well. e l a �* 1:"" Thc'parcel to be subdivided is located in Groundwater Management'Lone 4. 2. The parcel is depicted as one lot on the 1981 tax map. i f 3. The parcel size is 42,154 square feet (so. It is proposed to subdivide the parcel into two lots at 19,904 sf and 22,250 sf. Average lot size is 21,077 sf. 4. The average lot size is 53% of the required lot size. The yield at density ; would be one residential lot. 5. Sewage disposal will be via septic tank and leaching pools. 6_ Depth to groundwater is 2.2 feet below existing grade according to the submitted test hole. 7. Soils are acceptable with sand and gravel at 1 1 feet below existing grade. 8., The proposed lots will have water service via private drinking water wells. E • Brian L. Harper,M.D.,ItGP.H.,Commissioner Hearing Date: November 18,2004 ' ! Subject: Findings and Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: ; 510-02-0014—Woodhouse Residence,s/e/c Bay Avenue,aka: Village Lane, and Navy Street,Orient--Ito Southold—SCTM: 1000 02600 0100 012000 z 9. The proposed lot No. 1 is improved with a single-fancily dwelling and accessory structures. The dwelling on this lot was constructed prior to 1957. The water supply for the dwelling consists of a private well located in the cellar. ' 1 10. The proposed Iot No. 2 is also improved with a single-family dwelling constructed prior to 1957 and accessory structures. There is also an existing ' z well on this lot that is center of the;60ft ,lot. This well was installed ki 10" and last ` t jed by the d i rc nl'on October 20,2003. The well met water quality standards. The well has a total ; depth of 25 feet with a static water level of 4.5 feet, 11. Each dwelling has a sewage disposal system consisting of a septic tank with one block leaching pool and one precast leaching pool. The septic systems { have been certified by an engineer to be in good working order. F 12. In each case, the existing well is located approximately 20 feet to 25 feet to the northwest of the existing sewage disposal system. , v- 13. Direction of groundwater flow is presumed west toward the harboi. i 14. The project has approval from the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals issued on April 17,2003. 3 S z 1<3eternrifnatlrr�tt' The Board will grant the request for a variance for the 2-lot subdivision, based on the existing approved uses subject to the following conditions: r 4 The well located on lot 1 shall be removed from the-cellar and replaced with a well in a more optimum location that maximizes the separation distance from sewage disposal systems taking into account the direction of groundwater flow. It is also recommended that the well on lot 2 be moved to a more optimum location. ' a « A covenant shall be provided, in language acceptable to the County Attorney,that the approved lots shall not be further subdivided and each lot is limited to one ` single-family residence only with accessory uses as may be approved by the Town of Southold. Brian L. Harper,M.D.,1PP.H.,Commissioner [ ~ Hearing Date:November 18,2004 `f! Subject: Findings and Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: S10-02-0014—Woodhouse Residence,s/e/c Bay Avenue,aka: Village Lane, and Navy Street,Orient—t/o Southold—SCTM: 1000 02600 0100 012000 Granting of the variance in this case will have no effect on water quality because the density will be equivalent to development on the parcel that is preexisting and legally occupied. As per §760-609 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (Sanitary Code), the approval of the,variance for two lots under the conditions mentioned is in harmony with 3 the general purpose and intent of the Sanitary Code to protect groundwater and drinking water supplies, surface water and other natural resources, and public health, safety and welfare. k November 22,2004 Costa,P. - Chairman—Board of Review fJ` - 3 i 2 ' • S F Y } e s 3 "s �T i z S > f t S t S i S 1 Q I f 3 LAW OFFICES WICKHAM,BRESSLER&GEASA,P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD, P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565 ebressler@wbglawyers.com October 21,2020 .�ialnil-]D"eliyer'"ec�" j Historic Preservation Commission Edward Webb, Chairman Town of Southold { 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 4 Southold,New York 11971 Re:. Vincent BertauIt, 95 Navy St:; Orient,NY SCTM#1000-26-'1-f2.2 s ' Dear Mr.Webb and Board Members: F f We are the attorneys for Vincent Bertault,("Bertault"), and write in furtherance of his ` application to renovate and expand his house and shed on his property,,("Project") and in response to the October 19,2020 letter, ("Letter")from Evan and Lynn Lewis, ("Lewis") regarding the Project, s The contents of the Letter provide no basis for denial or modification of the Project.Thus,we ask that the Project be approved as applied for. At the.outset,we note that the Letter raises no substantial issues with respect to the Project. Rather, it supports the Project. Indeed,Lewis concedes that when weathered the Project will be "very in keeping"with other properties in and around the Village. The thrust of the Letter is directed toward issues which are not before the Committee and, in part, will never come before the Committee.As noted in our earlier letter of October 19,2020, the barn is not a part of the Project before the Committee. Thus, any issues regarding the barn which fall within the Committee's jurisdiction will be addressed in connection with any subsequent application as to the barn. Thus,the comments in the Letter concerning the barn are irrelevant. The comments in the Letter concerning the proposed pool are similarly irrelevant to the Project. Moreover, issues concerning the pool will not be before the Committee at any time, as they do not fall within Section 170-6 of the Southold Town Code. We are constrained to note, however,the location of Lewis' recently built shed virtually on top of the mutual property line. PinlilINA60-6nIffiehts in the Letter concerning th-' e,a matter for g, Ojfp neig46rf��,djs u�-!on",as they arepj ps _4Wy� IQU( ejur-Isdictibii Of the Gornzr�i�tee: d e,�argp,.of "anc `UC f _M14 veraan Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Very_tail yours, Eric,. I EJBIcs LAW OFFICES WICKHAM,BRESSLER&GEASA,P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD, P.O.BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06-02) a MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J.BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 ABIGAIL A.WICKHAM JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO.631-298-8565 ebressier@wbglawyers.com October 19,2020 Historic Preservation Commission Edward Webb, Chairman Town of Southold 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Vincent Bertault • •�; �-�- —95-Navy'St.-,-Orient;NY-SCTM#1000-26=1=-1'2:2= Dear Mr.Webb and Board Members: i i 4 =a p-=lcatailoe' zo:'rert�vaarufivcTk°e.�aridii'' eaiuis€fe=,an("Bd teutfilt") a &*. i �n_ u4J 11 1 ._.f.. ,toreysrt fitati , lc s apertzonhiis z P�o'ect=-�.��1icl:Ynu. response to the written objections of Ellen'McNeilly,("Objectant")dated September 26,2020, ("Olijectigns" .<: e do 1a�ot, i �ee tl;at'flip,0bjeetions'a'r`exelevart;ta the Project orb In fact and.�aw;A&roPilifiy,' k'tkiat;t7ia:�flBj*W a - l� �'� ,1 c +,ans;be di5rega�dei�'axicl the Project be, zoved. ThQbJt? auierits in opposition to the Project.Each of these arguments is addr ssesl ui{el t iaw acrd s,: hor tri to`bii-iA thout merit. The Objectant first asserts that there exist violations of the Historic Preservation Commission gerso1ution46.17.14.1 dat`edJA M618,2014,(`%6solution"). This assertion should be rejected for � fottr;fea"s_oris.b First,the ZEkilutiou is irrelevant . � , ; LIt'_" `�or;appraVar ofalter�tez�lr:,of �acles;iif .1�sto�4: dniaiks".,4,az'esc�Iiition:on'�;cliffexent;u V licatiori�ais-riot:v4)i '' < PP tliirithe:factir; se�fiirtC;i�n; Sarithold'Town`Coile 1r' U=$ ;Seooncl,asstmiing; that the Resolution is relevant (}?vjudk` is nod);i--, 4 riot;impase,any;eondifibns or obligations on Bertault with respect to the Project or otherwise. Rather, it reflected in its recitals only Bertault's good faith intentions as to flora.Third,again assuming, arguendo. the relevance of the Resolution(which it is not), it speakV9Aly,to,eyen6,occurring and a#hiig relocation;of tlie,barn;14mage,%Ahew..i1low tree occurretl;loiig aftcitsuch; �1 cation. 'nd+eed, during such relocatiari=of the baro;$er a4ilt expanded considerably,:extra•eilpentte:in ensuring the integrity of the willow tree's root system -by having ihlff6h'of the exc4ria#i 4 work performed by hand. Finally,again assuming,,arpeii j the relevance of the Resolution(which it is not),Bertault has justified the treatment of the then existing ttees and shrubs during,,t &relddation of the,barn,to wit: the economic justification for notrrelocating the,ho&s Thus,the:gesolution is:irrelevaritto the Project and, in any event, no violation thereof occurred. The Objectant next asserts that the Project should be limited to the house only and should not include the shed and barn. This assertion should be rejected for three reasons. First,the assertion is superfluous since the accessory barn is not the subject of the.P.rojec't. eeond,.the"accessory ' shedfissub'ect to review liy: ' J ihe::Cominittee,gnly Imder.:Soutlidld T'6w 'Cod&,§'°170-8` 'W`a no'ie; however;the use and location ifftI e:shezi are"ofrigt-"i�idetIh6,`Sguthold'Town,Code Zoriii J Code since the use of the she,I•as a: ciof canaria-is ermtl'in_the zoniri P 1 . '_.ntte._ g sarct and tiie location of the shed is permis6ible iii t ie;rear:yardk no;vari##! are necessary. Sanitary issues are;fox the Suf ollc.Coutity-UWth Department,not the Committee. All necessary approvals will t alit�inecZ,in<coru ctidz with`tYie`Pioject. Fif ty,the plans for the shed are entirely consistent with requirements of Southold-T vn Code §,:171x1-8. �`lieCllajec#azit; etasserts-the`estrtce:ofa<` %isleadiii ''ancr ental: em_ approadh`p obtain ,Pezmits_fo :t e;Piopefty,. Thdse,a� a tioiis,s oaiitl'3�ex ecYe :nothin' :uthcrentlfour,r�assins.,,First ,tl�ere--is;. y inisleacliaig or'iuproper Ina'ddressirg; ssizs withrespect to"a particcilair prgpertyiii;aid."irierem�eztalrta�uieit Indeed; emu Ie struc3urea a `weer •._.:: tlp- re.invtived;rifis�< ; generally accepted approach. S ;cord,Fa inexernenfal•appxgactr: oes not dimin sit;the•abilityy of R the Committee to apply the factors set forth in-Southold Town Cvcl'cR§170-8 to.eaci; pplicalile x acti6iThird, whatever Bertau is"vision"; oar,thep�roperty may entail, implementation of that « : . vision may be obtained incretiaenfially:'ani-Is;nbff6th6less-,stibject to all necessary approvals, hichB,ertault;hs`s.ciiligenfly""soiiit and,iiowee linall - - 4 des. y,";tho—Objectant implies that"owner _ enjoytrzerit"is soizie iow;au•ii iperm s$il;16did ivat lux,, is astoundingnproposit' teritI .l'al a "= ion is 1?u_ y4 s ;,4s,iecpgwzodby•l bth:;tlidSoiftbol i;Tawn!2onin c�arii,of, 17 241 detriniriatia g° Appeals in its April n�( riiiing# anal'bythis:Coinrriitteein;Rtieolutiort #6..1'7.,14.1 (71h ret Owrieir=erij`oment,is one of the principal aspects of property ownership and should be f denigrated. } The Objectant next asserts that the potential existence of other regulatoryapprovals somehow should negatively impact the COtmnittee's fsvfetiv of the Pri*t.This asserddu is without;basis and only serves to confirm the Obj, s,,ggA ession that the is not"wellversed in,;catio, compliance". The Committee is charged with a specific review function, as are other regulatory agencies.Each should discharge only its responsibilities. Finally, the Objectant asserts in a generalized manner that she is unhappy with the sarchitectural aspects of the Project:Respedfully,the Committee should be guided by the dictates of SoutholdTown Code §170=85"zaiid;iib tfie,personal tasks of the-Objectant. The Objectant raises only one`factual obje+eticiii to the Project,,alli 'klf lse:�SpeoificaIly, Qbjectant erxoneou`sl `asseits" thatthe proposed'addition:to the residence'involves"d'oubte Height".In Eact;{the,p'roposed addition is.loiver`than'the stirig;two-storystructureat-only one:atid-one-half,stories,O.Iijectarit` opiries:as to_the"modern"`approach is not based iii fat#and is belied by the similar architectural features and Imes sharez3 byexisting residence and proposed addition. Similarly, Objectant opinion that the modest addition to the shed somehow renders it"unshed like" is not based in fact. S f S s ; The Objectant's opposition to the Project taken as a whole is reflective of nothing more than the continuing desire of a neighbor to limit Bertault's use of his property and impose her vision ' on the property.No cognizable basis for denial of this application is set forth.Accordingly,we ask that the Projecfbe approvecl. Thank you. Very truly yours, EJB/cs f Z 1? Y n S 2 J