Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLoGiudice, Joseph Board of Trustees July 21, 2004 building retaining walls to stablize the situation; in fact, the retaining walls were built in order to build a platform to build a generic house on that platform, the developer's solution to the sloping problem. It had nothing to do with environmental considerations at all. it was to simplify construction of the house. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Do I have a motion to close the hearing? TRUSTEE DICKERSON: So moved. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Second. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: All in favor? ALL AYES TRUSTEE K-RUPSKI: I make a motion to deny the application for a set of stairs for Matine, Inc. because on the current condition of4an access stairs that's available to the applicant to reach Long Island Sound. 1 make a motion to deny without prejudice. If the access stairs ever becomes unavailable to the applicant at anytime, the applicant is more than welcome to reapply for access to the Long Island Sound, the b&eLch. TRUSTEE �,QLIWODA: Second. TRUSTEE kRU'PSKI: All in favor? ALL AYES. TRUSTEE RA-UPSKI: Opposed? TRUSTEE POSTER: I'll recuse myself. 26. Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. on behalf of JOSEPH LOGIUDICE requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 4' by 108' fixed timber catwalk with a boat lift. The catwalk is proposed to be elevated a minimum of 4 feet above the average high•water mark and will utilize four (4) 4' X 4' piles with a depth of penetration 6' plus, and (26) 6" diameter timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10 feet plus. The boat lift is proposed to be an Alum-A-Vator, utilizing (8) 10" diameter timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10 feet plus. Located: 10995 north Bayview Road, Southold. SCTM # 79-5-20.11 TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Is there anyone here who would like to speak in favor of this application? MR. BOWMAN: Chuck Bowman, very tired, if you have any questions, just ask me so we can all go home. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Have you done an environmental assessment 85 Board of Trustees July 21, 2004 of the water out in front of this property? MR. BOWMAN: What do you mean environmental assessment? As in eel grass beds? TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Did you find eel grass? MR. BOWMAN: No. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Or flora or fauna? MR. BOWMAN: No. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Or submerged aquatic vegetation? MR. BOWMAN: Not where the dock is going, no, and yes we did. We didn't find sostera beds if that's what you're asking. T.RUSTEE POLIWODA: The reason 1 asked that is because the ddy we inspected it, which was Wednesday, July 14th, we have pho.tos to back us up, there was 4 inches of eel grass on the shoreline, as you can see, tons of eel grass. M . BOWMAN: You mean on the rack line? TRUSTEE POLIWODA: On the rack line. In this photo, just behind,that rack line, approximately beginning 5 or 10 feet below the lbw mean water, we noticed extensive SAV. MR. BOWMAN: Most of that area, and again I'm talking about i the sostera, when I was out there, there was a lot of algae. It's' a rocky substrate, and that's where the dock was going. Now, I didn't do a whole story to see where those sostera beds are, if you want, I'm sure the water is clear en--ugh, 111.go out to the end of it, and I'll to the end of it and I'll -- If you want, I'll even have an underwater camera, we'll stick it under where the dock is going and shpw you a picture of where the dock is going, if that's what you like. But to answer your question, yes, we always look at that. When we put a dock out, we always look to see if there's eel 'grass beds. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: As far as the (inaudible) according to Town code. MR. BOWMAN: You have new plans, the boat lift has been eliminated. There was new plans sent to you, quite some time ago. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: That's about all my comments. I see a lot-.of eel grass here and this property off the location. MR. BOWMAN: I'll be more than happy to do what I volunteered to do, make you feel comfortable. This 86 Board of Trustees July 21,2004 application's been around for a long time; l have no problem. It's a legitimate question, if you will feel more comfortable, I will provide you with that. i TRUSTEE KRUPSKi: Why don't we bring everything up so we don't get to the next one. You had other questions about i the fish movement and sedimentation's TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Right. I figured it went all through this at a hearing. MR. BOWMAN: Understand you all approved the Miller dock. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: That was a different location, different bottom structure. MR. BOWMAN: It's fairly close by though. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Different code also. MR. BOWMAN,. I say it's a different code, absolutely, but it has very many of the similar characteristics. TRUSTS POLIWODA: I'd just like to point out in this locafton, it will abut a fish trap there. So right now there are no hard structures in that water that impede or prohibit certain fish. MR. BOWMAN,: But again I would ask you the question, what makes you think an open pile dock is going to impede fish? Usually open pile docks would attract big fish which may actually bring more fish into the area and not certainly impede their movement. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: To rehash the whole long scenario I drew up last time, you bring in hard structure, you bring in a change of species. You bring in black fish, you bring in bass, right now there's probably flounder, fluke. MR. BOWMAN: I would imagine those trap nets are there probably for bass, weakfish, they're not there for fluke. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: They're not meant to be inhabited areas. MR. BOWMAN: But you just said it's going to change species and bring in bass, that's what's there now, that's what the target species are there now. Probably weakfish are the target species now. It is certainly not fluke that are the target species or winter flounder that are the target species. So I don't see where that changes species are going to be, blackfish, I doubt if in the summer time, maybe in the wintertime, in the wintertime you might get some or 87 Board of Trustees July 21, 2004 i in the late fall when the water temperatures fall, but certainly in the summer time they're not going to be there, the water temperature's too warm. They're not going to be anywhere around. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: They probably catch all those fish you mention because they're migrating through the area; however, if you put a structure through the area, all of a sudden they become an inhabitant and they may chase away various species. They may chase out the squid. MR. BOWMAN-. Again, I would certainly not see where a pier is going to affect a migratory fin fish in the area there. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Any other consideration of sedimentation j from the piles? TRUSTEE POLIWODA: That's always a consideration as we've seen in the other locations in the bay. One great example would be off-Cleat's Point in Greenport. The sedimentation is incredible. MR. BOWMAN: Again, I'm going by my recollection, and I think that's a legitimate question, and I will certainly i . document-the ,bottom type to you. My recollection is that it was a rocky substrate. I will go out and again, it was a while ago because we started this whole process when actually, 1 think it was probably a couple years ago then it was put on hold because the house got sold. I will go and update that data for you. That's a legitimate question. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: l wanted to just bring everything up. MR. BOWMAN: 1 appreciate that. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: And depth of water at the end of the dock; will you provide that? MR. BOWMAN: Four feet. TRUSTEE POLiWODA: Four feet? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Can I make a motion to table this application? TRUSTEE KING: Second. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: All in favor? ALL AYES. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Did you see eel grass on the shore? MR. BOWMAN: I've seen eel grass there. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Probably the first time I've seen it there in 10 years. MR. BOWMAN: Let me take you down to Great South Bay 88 Board of Trustees July 21, 2004 sometime, and they're piled this high and they're not eel grass beds all over the bay. So you have to keep that in mind. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Thank you. 27. Catherine Mesiano, Inc. on behalf of DEBORAH DOTY requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 3' by 85' fixed walk at minimum 3' above grade, T by 12' ramp and a 6' by 20' floating dock. Located: 670 West Creek Avenue, Cutchogue.. SCTM # 103-1,3-5.3. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to speak-on behalf of the applicant? MS. MESIANO: That would be me. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI;: Any questions, comments? MS. MESIANO: Yes, Catherine Mesiano on behalf of the applicant. At the time of the site inspection, we had extensive canversation about alternative materials that might be in the construction of the structure. After discussing with Miss Doty, she is willing to consider the alternatives. I have contacted the company that Jim had recommended, I had, by the way, gone to North Fork Welding. They had no material. They really weren't sure what I was referring to. I got the information from Lauren and took it back to them. They still couldn't help me, so I contacted the company directly. They're sending me samples, which l hadn't received, grading material, and when l got that materia[, I'm going.to have this looked at by an engineer, so that they can give us an opinion as to the feasibility of using that type of material, and if the material is adequate structurally and has the type of life that you would expect that type of material in that type of an application, then we will be able to design a dock of a low profile, and we would then like to take that to the DEC. What I would like to ask of the Board in this instance is that you grant me an approval subject to my submission to you of a plan that is acceptable to you because 1 would like to take that plan then to the DEC with the Board's.endorsement. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Just did that about five hours ago. MS. MESIANO: Did I miss it? 89 o��SUfFO(�-c Albert J.Krupski,President QG Town Hall James King,Vice-President 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster o - P.O.Box 1179 y Ken Poliwoda Southold,New York 11971-0959 G Peggy A.Dickerson � � �� y�JQl Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631)765-1366 BOARD OF TOWNTRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MINUTES RECEIVED `O(� Wednesday, August 18, 2004 7:00 PM CA-��a. Present were: Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President OF Southoli Tovin Clerk James King, Vice-President Kenneth Poliwoda, Trustee Peggy Dickerson, Trustee E. Brownell Johnston, Esq. — Assistant Town Attorney for Trustees Lauren Standish, Secretarial Assistant Heather Tetrault, Environmental Technician Absent was: Artie Foster, Trustee CALL MEETING TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE NEXT FIELD INSPECTION: Thursday, September 16, 2004 at 8:00 a.m. TRUSTEE DICKERSON moved to approve, TRUSTEE KING seconded. All AYES. NEXT TRUSTEE MEETING: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. WORK SESSION: 6:00 p.m. TRUSTEE KING moved to Approve, TRUSTEE POLIWODA seconded. ALL AYES. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Public hearings, Number 5, William Goggins has been postponed. Number 6, Theodore Laoudis has been postponed. Number 11, Joseph Logiudice has been postponed. l Board of Trustees 65 Sept. 22, 2004 new retaining wall; place 1,500 to 1,800 pound boulders in front of new retaining wall; reconstruct existing 5.5' by 20' stairs; construct a new set of 5.5' by 20'stairs on the south side of the property; remove and dispose of a total of 107' of bulkhead and construct a total of 107' of bulkhead using C-Loc 4500 vinyl sheathing; remove and dispose of the most seaward 20' section of existing jetty and construct a new 20' section of jetty using C-Loc 4500 vinyl sheathing; remove and dispose of a 35' section of bulkhead and construct a new 35' section of bulkhead using C-Loc 4500 vinyl sheathing. Located: 405 Kimberley Lane, Southold. SCTM 70-13-20.3 and 20.4. TRUSTEE KING: Is there anyone here who would like to speak in favor of this application? MR. COSTELLO: George Costello, Senior, representing Mr. Laoudis. Back;,in August 30th of this year, I had a one line recommendation from the DEC and that was to restore the existing jetty to the original height, and I think that's what Mrs. Dickerson asked me at the last public hearing, that was all they said. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is that shown on the plans? MR. COSTELLO: Yes. TRUSTEE KING: If there's no other comments, I'll make a motion to close the public hearing. TRUSTEE DICKERSON: Second. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: All in favor? ALL AYES. TRUSTEE KING: I'll make a motion to approve the application as stated. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Second. TRUSTEE KING: All in favor? ALL AYES. 19. Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. on behalf of JOSEPH K. LOGIUDICE requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 4' by 108'fixed timber catwalk with a boat-lift. The catwalk is proposed to be elevated a minimum of 4' above the apparent high water mark and will utilize four 4" by 4"piles with a depth of penetration 6' plus, and (26) 6" diameter timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10' plus. The boat lift is proposed to be an "Alum-A-Vator" utilizing (8) 10" diameter timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10' plus. Located: 10995 North Bayview Road, Southold. SCTM # 79-5-20.13. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone who would like to speak on behalf of this application? MR. HALL: Yes, Dan Hall with Land Use. Boat lift has been removed from the project, just four 10"diameter tie-off Board of Trustees 66 Sept. 22, 2004 piles, and since the last meeting, which I guess had been tabled, we went out and did some site investigations on the bottom sediment and observations, and we submitted a letter to that on August 8th indicating there was a concern regarding some eel grass that washed up. And we looked around with masks. I went there a couple times, we couldn't find any eel grass growing on or near the site, and the sediment on the site was consistently coarse sand and rocks, had some algae and seaweed growing on it, which is not consistent with transporting sand in the area of the proposed dock. I'll answer any questions the Board might have regarding this. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: I guess we were mistaken. It-was codium grass that was growing out there, not eel grass. We assumed it was eel grass because there was about a 3 inch mound of eel grass up and down the shoreline, so we looked out and saw this massive vegetation, and it ended up being codium, which is equally important because it does provide sanctuary for scallops to set on. MR. HALL: We didn't observe anything other than sea lettuce on the bottom in the area of the dock. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: We had our environmental technician look at the site. She took 100 foot by 100 foot sample of the site, which she sampled and found several species there. She found codium fragile, filamentous red algae, channeled whelk, spider crabs, hermit crabs, sand crabs, lady crabs, crepidula fornicate, large shell clams, razor clams, large, schools of silversides (Menidia menidia), ghost shrimp, tube I worms. Sounds like quite a bit. MR. HALL: I'm sure in a 100' by 100' area anywhere in the bay you would find those species, I would imagine. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: That would probably be the area impacted by a vessel and a dock. TRUSTEE DICKERSON: My biggest concern in this particular application is that it's area of unaltered shoreline, and that it's very pristine, and there's not a lot of docks and that one of the main goals of the Peconic Estuary program is no net shore increase of hardened shoreline in the Peconic Estuary. Who looked at this? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I did. I'm just trying to move it along. MR. HALL: There's some groins associated with the inlet, to the west, and to the east there's another dock. I don't know how far away it is. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: There is one dock far down to the east, and that dock I fished out in those waters for the last 20 L Board of Trustees 67 Sept. 22, 2004 years. I've never seen a boat docked alongside that dock yet. That guy has a rubber dingy, when he comes in with his vessel, he anchors it probably 300 feet offshore, and he runs a rubber raft to that dock, which, in that case -- MR. HALL: There's four feet of water depth at the end of the dock. So at least two and-a-half feet separation between the boat there and the bottom. MS. TETRAULT: Just notice from what I gave you too just had some of the things to keep in mind is the location because there have been docks around the corner that in ice and storms they have just torn out and washed up down the beach. So its a pretty bad location as far as the northeast. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Some of those pilings from the docks around the corner are just east of Cedar Beach. They're sitting on the beach. MS. TETRAULT: They're still there from two winters ago. think that, and what Peggy said in the new code there's all kind's of things about keeping the beaches that don't have docks without docks. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: If there's no other comment. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: There's one other important comment to mention that there is a fish trap out there, and this dock will likely have an impact on the fishery of that fish trap. MR. HALL: It's pretty far to the northwest. I saw it. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Not that far away. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I make a motion to close the hearing. TRUSTEE DICKERSON: Second. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: All in favor? ALL AYES TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: We're going to reserve judgment on this. We're not going to vote tonight. Reserve our decision. 20: Land Use Ecological Service, Inc., on behalf of SKUNK LANE TRUST CIO BRADLEY AND MARY KRAUSE requests a Wetland Permit to construct a timber catwalk with ladder at the end of the catwalk. Located: 9105 Skunk Lane, Cutchogue. SCTM # 104-3018.1. TRUSTEE KING: Is there anyone here to comment? MR. HALL: Dan Hall of Land Use. I believe this is what was discussed on in the field. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: This is what we discussed, we met with Kelly in the field. TRUSTEE KING: If there's no other comments, I make a motion to close the hearing. . TRUSTEE DICKERSON: Second. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: All in favor? ALL AYES. Board of Trustees 14 September 21, 2005 SCTM#81-1-16.10 TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Board of Trustees approved the application of Paradise Point Association for a Wetland Permit for -repair of an existing rdocking facility with the following changes, and is subject to new plans approved before release of a permit. The existing 6'by 100'foot floating dock to be moved 10 feet to the northwest; the same dock will be shortened to the end of the third seaward finger float to approximately 76 feet in order to follow the code requirement for docks setting no more than one-third across the waterway. The finger at the end of the existing dock to the west will be removed. The fingers of the docks landward to seaward will be permitted at 3'by 20', 3' by 40', and 3' by 40'. The two docks to the west will be removed. TRUSTEE KING: Second. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: All in favor? ALL AYES 2. Catherine Mesiano on behalf of MARY ZUPA requests a Wetland,Permit to install a 4' by 30'fiberglass grid walk two and a half feet above grade, 3' by 6' ramp and a 6' by 20'float, two'8"piles. Located: 580 Basin Road, Southold. SCTM#81-1-16.7 TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: The Board of Trustees approves the Wetland Permit of Mary S. Zupa to install a 4' by 30'fiberglass grid walk two and a half feet above grade, a 3' by 6' ramp, and 6' by 20'float, two 8" piles parallel to the Paradise Point dock with the condition that the new plans be submitted that place the location of the dock 20 feet to the west of the proposed location. The new location must be staked and inspected before construction begins. TRUSTEE FOSTER: Second. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: All in favor? ALL AYES. MS. MESIANO: Can I expect a copy of that resolution in the future? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: You can go through the office tomorrow. 3. Patricia C. Moore on behalf of JOSEPH LOGUIDICE requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 4' by 108'fixed timber catwalk, with four tie-off piles. The catwalk is proposed to be elevated a minimum of four foot above the average high watermark and will utilize four 4" by 4" piles with a depth of penetration 6' plus, and 26 6"diameter timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10' plus, and four 10" diameter CCA timber tie-off piles. Located: 10995 North Bayview Road, Southold. SCTM#79-5-20.13. MS. MOORE: Can I start? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: We're just reading the resolution, there's no public hearing. MS. MOORE: Are you going to accept the LWRP recommendation? BROWNELL JOHNSTON: There's no discussion. 14 Board of Trustees 15 September 21, 2005 TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I don't think we have a choice but to accept it. It's just a recommendation. MS. MOORE: No. Let me put on the record for you, you have to decide what you're going to do, but-- TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Well, we have decided, that's why we have the resolution. MS. MOORE: If you're going to deny it and it's based in part on the LWRP, that LWRP report came after the close of the hearing, and it came after the consistency was already granted by the state. If, in fact, you're going to rely on it, then we would ask for an opportunity to respond to LWRP. LWRP has determined this to be inconsistent and they have made the statement, which I think is erroneous both under LWRP as well as I think anybody's knowledge of the Chapter 97, which is that you are permitted to have a dock in the bay. If this Board is taking the position that there are no docks permitted in the bay that people like my client who pays $38,000 in taxes a year will have a serious issue with the Town of Southold and everybody else who has a waterfront property, is a bay front property owner, is going to have a serious problem with this Board and the Town Board. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: First things first, the LWRP, if you have a problem with the LWRP consistency report, you have to take that up with the LWRP consistency report coordinator. MS. MOORE: We tried, I tried, and the LWRP coordinator said-- TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: No, let me finish, otherwise I'm not going to answer anything because this isn't a public hearing. We get the recommendation; if you have a problem with the recommendation, you talk to the coordinator, not us. It's not our recommendation, we didn't write it, we didn't research it. MS. MOORE: Then you're misunderstanding the procedure. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: You can talk to the Town Board. MS. MOORE: I'm sorry, you're wrong. The LWRP is a recommendation to this Board. There is no appeal procedure. There is no variance procedure. It is a recommendation by LWRP coordinator. If, in fact, it's a report to this Board, and you're going to rely on it in any way in coming to your decision, then an applicant has the right to respond and submit comments and response to the LWRP recommendation. Because otherwise it's a bunch of numbers and the following policy standard. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Let me read the resolution. Have you seen the resolution? MS. MOORE: In if it's an approval then I apologize. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: You got to let me read the resolution. MS. MOORE: I'm sorry. The only problem I have is if it's a denial, I have to put in a response because we'll be in court. 15 Board of Trustees 16 September 21,2005 TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Otherwise, you want what you want and that's it. MS. MOORE: No, no, what I'm trying to say is, if the Board is inclined to approve it then we have no issue. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Let me read the resolution. MS. MOORE: Fine, you read the resolution before you vote. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: It's there's no public comment. It's just a resolution. We had the public hearing. MS. MOORE: You've taken in documentation after the close of the public hearing. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: We understand completely what we did. MS. MOORE: All right, I guess my point is -- BROWNELL JOHNSTON: Pat, you also have the alternative if you don't like what they do to sue us under Article 78. MS. MOORE: That's what you will get. And what I'm trying to do is avoid that situation and establish a record. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Every time someone comes in here and wants something that we feel would damage the town environmentally, and just threaten us with a lawsuit, we can't roll over and say, do whatever you want. TRUSTEE FOSTER: It's my understanding whatever the LWRP decision is is binding on us that we don't have the opportunity to overturn it. Whatever the decision is we have to abide by it. " MS. MOORE: You're absolutely wrong. TRUSTEE FOSTER: We were told by our attorneys today that's the way it was. MS. MOORE: I'm sorry, LWRP is a recommendation. TRUSTEE FOSTER: It's a law from what I understand. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Let me read the resolution, so we can move on. There are a lot of people waiting here for things that are important to them, and this probably isn't one of them. "Whereas, the Land Use Ecological Service, Inc. on behalf of Joseph Loguidice applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated May 2004, and "Whereas, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and "Whereas, the,Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council resolved to recommend disapproval, and "Whereas, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on September 22, 2004 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and "Whereas, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and "Whereas,the Board has considered all the testimony 16 Board of Trustees 17 September 21, 2005 and documentation submitted concerning the application, and "Whereas, the dock as proposed is located in an area prohibited by Chapter 97 of the Town code specifically: "Wetlands and Shorelines, 97-27, C. In water. (2) Docks, (b) Dock Locations and Length: 1, no dock shall be erected if in the opinion of the Trustees such structure would adversely affect navigation, fishery, scenic quality or habitat areas; (c) Regulations for the Placement and Configuration of Docking Facilities: 1, residential docks: In determining the permitted length of.a proposed residential dock the Trustees shall seek to maintain length consistent with other docks in the waterway. (D) Review and Approval of Dock Applications: 1, before issuing a permit for a dock structure the Trustees shall consider whether the dock will have any of the following harmful effects: (d)Whether the dock will significantly impair the use or value of any property adjacent to or near the dock. (e) Whether the dock will cause degradation of the surface water quality and natural resources. (f)Whether the dock will cause habitat fragmentation and loss of significant coastal fish and wildlife habitats. (g)Whether the dock will result in the destruction of or prevent the growth of vegetated wetlands, sea grasses, including eel grass and widgeon grass or shellfish. (j)Whether the dock will be safe when constructed. (k)Whether the dock will adversely effect view, viewsheds and vistas important to the community. And "Whereas, it is found that the area of shoreline where the dock is proposed currently is not developed with docks and in following the stated intent of the town code, the Trustees are committed to preserving such sections of shoreline which still exist in the natural state into enhancing visual quality and protecting scenic resources of the Town, and, "Whereas, the proposed dock will cause fragmentation of'habitat and structural intrusion and change the continuity and configuration of the natural shoreline, and, "Whereas, the proposed dock will run contrary to the Trustees'efforts to maintain the natural resources and the ecological integrity of the contiguous and ecological community and maintain corridors to allow for the exchange of biological resources, and, "Whereas, the Trustees support the findings of the Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan for the, Peconic Estuary, which was recently approved by New York State and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and which plan's goals include a policy of no net increase of 17 Board of Trustees 18 September 21, 2005 hardened shoreline in the Peconic Estuary, and thus the permission of the instant application would run counter to that policy and the factors enumerated above and in Chapter 97, and, "Whereas aerial photographs of the surrounding area show the shoreline to be stable in areas in which there are no such structures and show significant erosion in areas in which there are docks,jetties and wave breaks, leading the Trustees to the conclusion that the installation of a dock in this area would adversely affect the shoreline, and, "Whereas the area consists of a significant and unaltered shoreline, a near shore shallow water habitat, a historical fisheries area with a fishing weir, a horseshoe crab nesting area, and contains healthy underwater vegetation, and, "Whereas, the dock as proposed is in very shallow water and will cause interference with navigation, with a fish weir and with boats traveling along the shore, and, "Whereas the proposed dock would face towards the northeast in such direction that area experiences very high winds and ice in the winter months, any such structure would not be safe from the wind,weather and ice conditions. Damage to the structure at that location would subject the shoreline downwind to significant harm in the event it breaks off, and, "Whereas, the proposed dock is inconsistent to the following Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Policy Standards: 1, 3, 3.1, (A) (D) (J) (K.3), 4.1 (A), 5.3 (C), 6.1 (A.2, A.3 and B.3), 8.3 (A, B and E), 9.1 (C-2, C-3 and E), 9.2 (A.1 and 3), 9.3 (A and E), 9.4 (A, B, E.1, E.2, E.3 and EA), 9.5, 10.3, 10.4 (A, B and C), 11.1 and 11.2, which are attached hereto, and is therefore inconsistent with the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan, and, "Whereas, the development of a dock in this area will interfere with public access to publicly owned lands and waters and is in an area that is undeveloped, highly valued open space a natural resource with visual and scenic views, and the LWRP includes policies that demand the protection of such characteristics and resources, and, "Whereas, the application for the proposed dock is contradictory to the findings of the Peconic Estuary Program's Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan and Nature Conservancy's Peconic Says Natural Shoreline Committee, and, "Whereas, the applicant currently enjoys reasonable, safe, convenient access to the waters of the Town as demonstrated by the stairs to the beach, boats on the beach, including a sailboat and a row boat, chairs, a table, and a 18 Board of Trustees 19 September 21,2005 fire box, and, "Whereas, 'reasonable access' is defined as the ability for riparian property owners to access the navigable waters of the Town, and, "Whereas, the land ownership of the applicant is to the high tide mark, and the Town may reasonably refuse to grant the proposed access over its property and rationally exercise its jurisdiction to deny the construction of a dock, and, "Now therefore, be it resolved that the Board of Trustees upon consideration of the application, personal inspection, review of the completed Consistency Assessment Form, the recommendation of the LWRP coordinator, policies of the LWRP, and the above enumerated factors, find the proposed action to be inconsistent with the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, and "Be it further resolved,that the Board of Trustees Denies the application of Joseph Logiudice to construct a 4' by 108'fixed timber catwalk with four tie-off piles, the catwalk proposed to,be elevated a minimum of 4'above the average high water mark and to utilize four 4" by 4"piles with a depth of penetration 6', and 26 6"diameter timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10 feet, four 10" diameter CCA timber tie-off piles are proposed, and, "Be it further resolved that this determination should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project." TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Second. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: All in favor? ALL AYES BROWNELL JOHNSTON: Because of the sensitivity of this application, could we do a roll call vote? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: All in favor? Ken? TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Aye to deny. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Peggy? TRUSTEE DICKERSON: Aye to deny. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Jim? TRUSTEE KING: Aye to deny. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Artie? TRUSTEE FOSTER: Aye to deny. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Aye. MS. MOORE: I still place my objections on the record that there was a consistency review done by the Department of State that that consistency issued a determination of consistency, which is what the LWRP based their legislation on. Also the fact that you have declared that docks are not permitted in the bay-- TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: We haven't done that, we said in this area. We didn't say Peconic Bay. We said in this area. MS. MOORE: We'll see what other ones you give in the bay. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: We review each site specific. 19 Board of Trustees 20 September 21,2005 MS. MOORE: This is an area where there are docks on either side. Both sides of this property looking up and down there are docks in the water. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Site specific. MS. MOORE: And this property owner pays $38,000 in taxes and deserves some consideration. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I'm not sure what everyone deserves. We're not here to grant everyone what everyone deserves, 1 don't think we're that powerful. Ken, would you like to make a motion on Scallop Season? TRUSTEE POLIWODA: I believe we were going to table the motion until October because Scallop Season is set by the DEC in the state waters, and we can't open Scallop Season prior to the setting of Scallop Season by the state. It looks like it's going to be after November 1st. I'll make a motion to table until the October meeting. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Second. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: All in favor? ALL AYES TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: We'll take a recess. There are a couple of public hearings that were postponed that won't be opened. 11, Alan Cardinale is postponed until October; 17, Vincent and Carol Manago has been postponed until further notice. Under Coastal Erosion, 4, Angelo Padavan and 5, Lewis and Helaine Teperman have also been postponed at the agent's request. BROWNELL JOHNSTON: Was it entered into the record that Jim was going to contact the state? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: It should be noted that Jim will contact the state to make sure we have an accurate opening date for scallops. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Make a motion to go off the regular meeting. (Recess was taken.) Vlll. PUBLIC HEARINGS: THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING IN THE MATTER OF THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER THE WETLANDS ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. I HAVE AN AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION FROM THE TRAVELER-WATCHMAN. PERTINENT CORRESPONDENCE MAY BE READ PRIOR TO ASKING FOR COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC. PLEASE KEEP YOUR COMMENTS ORGANIZED AND BRIEF. FIVE (5) MINUTES OR LESS IF POSSIBLE TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: For the Public Hearings we have about a dozen public hearings tonight. If you would like to comment please come up to the microphone and identify yourself so we have a clear record. 1. Docko, Inc. on behalf of COVE COTTAGE COMPANY, 20 Albert J.Krupski,PresidentQF S0Ufyo - Town Hall James King,Vice-President ,`O ��, 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster P.O. Box 1179 Ken Poliwoda South ,New York 11971-0959 Peggy A.Dickerson Q _ a Telephone(631)765-1892 cou Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES September 21, 2005 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Charles Bowman Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. P.O. Box 1060 Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: JOSEPH LOGIUDICE, 10995 NORTH BAYVIEW RD, SOUTHOLD SCTM# 79-5-20.13 Dear Mr. Bowman: The Board of Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday September 21, 2005 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS; Land Use Ecological Service, Inc. on behalf of JOSEPH LOGIUDICE applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated May 14, 2004, and WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council resolved to recommend disapproval, and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application,on September 22, 2004, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, 2 WHEREAS, the dock as proposed is located in an area prohibited by Chapter 97 of the Town Code, specifically: WETLANDS AND SHORELINE, 97-27, C. In Water. (2) Docks (b) Dock Locations and Lengths 1.No dock shall be erected if in the opinion of the Trustees such structure would adversely affect navigation, fisheries, scenic quality, or habitat areas. (c) Regulations for the Placement and Configuration of Docking Facilities 1.Residential Docks: ©In determining the permitted length of a proposed residential dock the Trustees shall seek to maintain lengths consistent with the other docks in the water way (d)Review and Approval of Dock Applications 1. Before issuing a permit for a dock structure, the Trustees shall consider whether the dock will have any of the following harmful effects: (d)Whether.the dock will significantly impair the use or value of waterfront property adjacent to or near the dock (e)Whether the dock will cause degradation of surface water quality and natural resources (f)Whether the dock will cause habitat fragmentation and loss of significant coastal fish and wildlife habitats (g)Whether the dock will result in the destruction of or prevent the growth of vegetated ,wetlands, sea grasses including eelgrass and widgeon grass or shellfish Q)Whether the dock will be safe when constructed (k)Whether the dock will adversely affect views, view sheds and vistas important to the community and, WHEREAS, it is found that the area of shoreline where the dock is proposed currently is not developed with docks, and in following the stated intent of the Town Code, the Trustees are committed to preserving such sections of shoreline which still exist in their natural state, and to enhancing visual quality and protecting scenic resources of the Town, and, WHEREAS, the proposed dock will cause fragmentation of habitat and structural intrusion and change to the continuity and configuration of the natural shoreline, and, _____WHEREAS, the proposed dock will run contrary to the Trustees' efforts to maintain the natural resources and the ecological integrity of the contiguous ecological community and maintain corridors to allow for the exchange of biological resources, and, WHEREAS, the Trustees support the findings of the Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan for the Peconic Estuary, which was recently approved by New York State and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and which Plan's goals include a 3 policy of "no net increase" of hardened shoreline in the Peconic Estuary, and thus the permission of the instant application would run counter to that policy and the factors enumerated above and in Chapter 97, and, WHEREAS, aerial photographs of the surrounding area show the shoreline to be stable in areas in which there are no such structures and show significant erosion in areas in which there are docks, jetties, and wave breaks, leading the Trustees to the conclusion that the installation of a dock in this area would adversely affect the shoreline, and, WHEREAS, this area consists of a significant and unaltered shoreline, a nearshore shallow water habitat, a historical fisheries area with a fishing weir, a horseshoe crab nesting area, and contains healthy underwater vegetation, and, WHEREAS, the dock, as proposed, is in very shallow water, and will cause interference with navigation, with the fish weir, and with boats traveling along the shore, and, WHEREAS, the proposed dock would face towards the Northeast, in such direction that area experiences very high winds and ice in the winter months, any such structure would not be safe from the wind, weather, and ice conditions. Damage to a structure at that location would subject the shoreline downwind to significant harm in the event it breaks off, and, WHEREAS, the proposed dock is INCONSISTENT with the following Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Policy Standards: 1, 3, 3.1 (A) (D) (J) (K. 3), 4.1 (A), 5.3 (C), 6.1 (A.2, A. 3 and B.3), 8.3 (A, B and E), 9.1(C-2, C-3 and E), 9.2 (A.1 and 3), 9.3 (A, and E), 9.4 (A, B, E.1, E.2, E.3 and E.4), 9.5, 10.3, 10.4 (A, B and C), 11.1 and 11.2, which are attached hereto, and is therefore INCONSISTENT with the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan, and, WHEREAS, the development of a dock in this area will interfere with public access to publicly owned lands and waters and in an area that is undeveloped, highly valued open space, a natural resource with visual and scenic views, and the LWRP includes policies that demand the protection of such characteristics and resources, and, WHEREAS, the application for the proposed dock is contradictory to the findings of the Peconic Estuary Pro-gram's Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan, and Nature Conservancy's Peconic Bays Natural Shoreline Committee, and, WHEREAS, the applicant currently enjoys reasonable, safe, convenient access to the waters of the Town as demonstrated by the stairs to the beach, boats on the beach including a sailboat and-a rowboaf,'chairs, a table, and a firebox;and, WHEREAS, "reasonable access" is defined as the ability for riparian property owners to access the navigable waters of the Town, and, WHEREAS, the land ownership of the applicant is to the high tide mark and the Town may reasonably refuse to grant the proposed access over its property and rationally exercise its jurisdiction to deny the construction off-a dock, and, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees, upon consideration of the application, personal inspection, review of the completed Consistency Assessment Form, the recommendation of the LWRP coordinator, the policies of the LWRP and the above enumerated factors, find the proposed action to be INCONSISTENT with the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees DENIES the application of JOSEPH LOGIUDICE to construct a 4' x 108' fixed timber catwalk with (4) tie-off piles, the catwalk proposed to be elevated a minimum of 4' above the AHWM, and to utilize (4) 4" x 4" piles with a depth of penetration 6'+, and (26) 6" diameter timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10'+. (4) 10" diameter CCA timber tie-off piles are proposed, and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this determination should not be considered a determination made for any other Department or Agency, which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. Very truly yours, 0,/ Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK: hkc Cc: Patricia C. Moore July 19, 2005 Field Inspect---- 4 _ July 19, 2005 Field Inspect---- t z r July 19, 2005 Field Inspe-*;^^, r rk'�N 'F c _ Telephonep Town Hall (63 1)765-1892 53095 Route 25_} Q P.O.Box 1'179 ��• a��� Southold,New York 11971-0959 CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL TOWN OF SOUTHOLD At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Tues., March 15, 2005, the following recommendation was made: Moved by Don Wilder, seconded by Jack McGreevy, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees DISAPPROVAL of the Wetland Permit application of JOSEPH LOGIUDICE to construct a 4'X 108' fixed timber catwalk with (4) tie-off piles: The catwalk is proposed to be elevated a min. of 4' above the AHWM and will utilize (4) 4"X 4" piles with a depth of penetration 6'+, and (26) 6" dia. timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10'+. (4) 10" dia. CCA timber tie- off piles are proposed. Located: 10995 North Bayview Rd., Southold. SCTM#79-5-20.13 The CAC recommends Disapproval of the application because of the following reasons: The installation of the structure would cause disturbance to the marine habitat. - The CCA pilings would have a negative impact on the environment. Excessive bottom coverage. The proposed dock is inconsistent with the present shoreline structures. There is a concern with the negative impact the docking facility would have on the neighboring shellfish hatchery. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried I Lan Use February 23, 2005 Town of Southold Board of Town Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold,N.Y. 11971 Attn: Heather Tetrault Re: Joseph LoGiudice/Proposed Dock North Bayview Rd., Southold SCTM# 1000-79-5-20.13 Dear Ms. Tetrault: Enclosed please find a copy of the NYSDEC Permit in regards to the above referenced proj ect. If there are any questions or if additional information is required please do not hesitate to contact our office. FEB 2 5 2006 Sincerely, Southold Town Board of Trustees Dan Tjf4l Land UsepAjRgjVptl Services, Inc. DH Enc. 209 West Main Street, 2nd Floor • P.O. Box 1060 • Riverhead, New York • 11901 631-727-2400 • FAX 631-727-2605 New York State Dep'. ''Hent of Environmental Conserv,,,_ _ n Division of Environmental Permits, Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 Telephone (631) 444-0357 Facsimile (631) 444-0360 Website: www.dec.state.ny.us -" -- Denise Sheehan Acting Commissioner February 17, 2005 i' Ba_ n rt,t— j Joseph LoGiudice 4062-72 Grumman Blvd. Calverton, NY 11933 RE: 1-4738-02467/00010 Dear Permittee: In conformance with the requirements of the State Uniform Procedures Act (Article 70, ECL) and its implementing regulations (6NYCRR, Part 62 1) we are enclosing your permit. Please read all conditions carefully. If you are unable to comply with any conditions, please contact us at the above address. Also enclosed is a permit sign which is to be conspicuously posted at the prof ect site and protected from the weather. Sincerely, , r` d usan V. Ackerman Environmental Analyst Bay d SVA/Is E FEB 2 5 2005 Southold Town Board of Trustees • NEW YO R?'�T+�TE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONQ-FRVATION DEC PERMIT NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE 1-4738102467/00010 February 17,2005 FACILITY/PROGRAM NUMBER(S) PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE(S) Under the Environmental February 17,2010 Conservatiori,Law TYPE OF PERMIT■New ❑Renewal❑Modification❑Permit to Construct ❑Permit to Operate ❑ Article 17,Titles 7, 8. SPDES ❑ Article 27,Title 9; 6NYCRR 373: ■ Article 15,Title 5: Protection of Waters Hazardous Waste Management ❑ Article 19:Air Pollution Control ❑ Article 15,Title 15 Water Supply ❑ Article 34: Coastal Erosion ❑ Article 23,Title 27:Mined Land Management I ❑ Article 15,Title 15:Water Transport 'Reclamation ❑ Article 36- Floodplain Management ❑ Article 15,Title 15• Long Island Wells ❑Article 24: Freshwater Wetlands ❑ Articles 1, 3, 17, 19, 27, 37; 6NYCRR ❑Article 15,Title 27: Wild,Scenic and ■ Article 25:Tidal Wetlands 380: Radiation Control Recreational Rivers ❑ Article 27,Title 7; 6NYCRR 360: ■ 6NYCRR 608:Water Quality Certifica- Solid Waste Management tion PERMIT ISSUED TO TELEPHONE NUMBER Joseph Lo Giudice (631)208-2933 ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE 4067-72 Grumman Boulevard, Calverton, NY 11933 CONTACT PERSON FOR PERMITTED WORK TELEPHONE NUMBER Land Use Ecological Services, P.O. Box 1060, Village Dock, Riverhead, NY 11901 (631) 727-2400 NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT/FACILITY Lo Giudice property, 10995 North Bayview Road', Southold SCTM#1000-79-5-20.13 COUNTY TOWN WATERCOURSE NYTM COORDINATES Suffolk Southold Southold Ba DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED ACTIVITY:, Construction of dock for existing residence, including 4' x 108' catwalk with four tie off piles. No ramp or float is included in this permit. All work must'be done in accordance with the attached plans by Land Use Ecological Services (sheets 1-3) dated 5/3/04, last revised 6/30/04 and stamped NYSDEC approved on 2/17/05. By acceptance of this permit,,the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict compliance with the ECL, all applicable regulations, the General Conditions specified (see page 2 & 3) and any Special Conditions included as part of this permit. PERMIT ADMINISTRATOR: ADDRESS Roger Evans SVA Region 1,Headquarters, Bldg. #40, SUNY, Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 AUTHORIZED SIGNAT E DATE Page 1 of 4 �� � February 17, 2005 NEW STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSE ON SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. Any debris or excess material from construction of this project shall be completely removed from the adjacent area (upland) and removed to an approved upland area for disposal. No debris is permitted in tidal wetlands and or protected buffer areas. 2. The storage of construction equipment and materials shall be confined to within the projectwork site and or upland areas greater than 50 linear feet from the tidal wetland boundary. 3. Dock or timber catwalk shall not exceed 4 feet in width and shall be a minimum of 3Y2 feet above grade*over tidal wetland areas (*as measured from ground to bottom of dock sheathing). 4. The use of wood treated with pentachlorohenol in the construction of structures that will be in contact with tidal waters is strictly prohibited. 5. No dredging,excavating or other alteration of shoreline or underwater areas is authorized by this permit, nor shall issuance of this permit be construed to suggest that the Department will issue a permit for such activities in the future. 6. No permanent structures may be installed on dock without first obtaining written Department approval (permit, modification, or amendment). 7. Pilings may not: (a)extend beyond property lines, (b) be placed so that docked boats extend over property lines, (c) interfere with navigation, (d) interfere with other landowners riparian rights. 8. No structures are to be constructed on pilings without further authorization of the Department. DEC PERMIT NUMBER PAGE 2 of 4- 1-4738-02467/00010 NEW-----,K STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ADDITIONAL GENERAL COQ' ,,IONS FOR ARTICLES 15 (TITLE 5), 24 34 AND 6NYCRR PART 608 (TIDAL WETLANDS) 1. If future operations by the State,of New York require an alteration in the position of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Department of Environmental Conservation it shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of said waters or flood flows or endanger the health, safety or welfare of the people of the State, or cause loss or destruction of the natural resources of the State,the owner may be ordered by the Departmentto remove oralterthe structural work,obstructions,or hazards caused thereby without expense to the State, and if, upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, the structure, fill, excavation, or other modification of the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be completed, the owners, shall, without expense to the State,and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may require, remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore to its former condition the navigable and flood capacity of the watercourse. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. 2. The State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused by or 'result from future operations undertaken by the State for the conservation or improvement of navigation,or for other purposes, and no claim or right to compensation shall accrue from any such damage. 3. Granting of this permit does not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of obtaining any other permission, consent or approval from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, U.S.Coast Guard, New York State Office of General Services or local government which may be required. 4. All necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude contamination of any wetland or waterway by suspended solids, sediments, fuels, solvents, lubricants, epoxy coatings, paints, concrete, leachate or any other environmentally deleterious materials associated with the project. 5. Any material dredged in the conduct of thework herein permitted shall be removed evenly,without leaving large refuse piles, ridges across the bed of a waterway or floodplain or deep holes that may have a tendency to cause damage to navigable channels or to the banks of a waterway. 6. There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the work herein authorized. 7. If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, the project hereby authorized has not been completed, the applicant shall,without expense to the State;and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may require, remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore the site to its former condition. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration 8. If granted under 6NYCRR Part 608,the NYS,Department of Environmental Conservation hereby certifies that the subject project will not contravene effluent limitations or other limitations or standards under Sections 301, 302, 303,306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act of 1977(PL 95-217)provided that all of the conditions listed herein are met. 9. At least 48 hours prior to commencement of the project,the permittee and contractor shall sign and return the top portion of the enclosed notification form certifying that they are fully aware of and understand all terms and conditions of this permit. Within 30 days of completion of project, the bottom portion of the form must also be signed and returned, along with photographs of the completed work and, if required, a survey. 10. All activities authorized by this permit must be in strict conformance with the approved plans submitted by the applicant or his agent as part of•the permit application. Such approved plans were prepared by Land Use Ecological Services(sheets 1-3)dated 5/3/04 and last revised 6/30/04. DEC PERMIT NUMBER PAGE 3 of 4 1-4738=02467/00010 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NOT ATION OF OTHER PERMITTEE OBLK )NS Item A: Permittee Accepts Legai mesponsibility and Agrees to Indemnif".aLmon The permittee expressly agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Department of Environmental Conservation of the State of New York, its representatives,employees,and agents("DEC")for all claims,suits, actions, and damages,to the extent attributable to the permittee's acts or omissions in connection with the permittee's undertaking of activities in connection with,or operation and maintenance of,the facility or facilities authorized by the permit whether in compliance or not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit. This indemnification does not extend to any claims, suits, actions, or damages to the extent attributable to DEC's own negligent or intentional acts or omissions, or to any claims, suits, or actions naming the DEC and arising under article 78 of the New York Civil Practice Laws and Rules or any citizen suit or civil rights provision under federal or state laws. Item B: Perm ittee's'Contractors to Comply with Permit The permittee is responsible for informing its independent contractors, employees, agents and assigns of their responsibility to comply with this permit,including'all special conditions while acting as the permittee's agent with respect to the permitted activities, and such persons shall be subject to the same sanctions for violations of the Environmental Conservation Law as those prescribed for the permittee. Item C: Permittee Responsible for Obtaining Other Required Permits The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits, approvals, lands, easements and rights-of-way that may be required to carry out the activities that are authorized by this permit. Item D: No Right to Trespass or Interfere with Riparian Rights This permit does not convey to the permittee any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of others in order to perform the permitted work nor does it authorize the impairment of any rights,title, or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a party to the permit. GENERAL CONDITIONS General Condition 1: Facility Inspection by the Department The permitted site or facility, including relevant;records, is subject to inspection at reasonable hours and intervals by an authorized representative of the Department of Environmental Conservation,(the Department)to determine whether the permittee is complying with this,permit and the ECL. Such representative may order the work suspended pursuant to ECL 71-0301 and SAPA 401(3). The permittee shall provide a person to accompany the Department's representative during an inspection to the permit area when requested by the Department. A copy of this permit, including all referenced maps,drawings and special conditions, must be available for inspection by the Department at all times at the project site or facility: Failure to produce a copy of the permit upon request by a Department representative is a violation of this permit. General Condition 2: Relationship of this Permit to Other Department Orders and Determinations, Unless expressly provided for by the Department, issuance of this permit does not modify, supersede or rescind any order or determination previously issued by the Department or any of the terms, conditions or requirements contained in such order or determination. General Condition 3: Applications for Permit Renewals or Modifications The permittee must submit a separate written application to the Department for renewal, modification or transfer of this permit. Such application must include any forms or supplemental information the Department requires. Any renewal, modification or transfer granted by the Department must be in writing. The permittee must°submit a renewal application at least: a) 180 days before expiration of permits for State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(SPDES), Hazardous Waste Management Facilities (HWMF), major Air Pollution Control (APC) and Solid Waste Management Facilities(SWMF); and b) 30 days before expiration of all other permit types. ' Submission of applications for permit renewal or modification are to be submitted to: NYSDEC Regional Permit Administrator, Region 1, SUNY Bldg#40, Stony Brook NY 11790-2356 General Condition 4: Permit Modifications,Suspensions and Revocations by the Department The Department reserves the right to modify, suspend or revoke this permit in accordance with 6 NYCRR Part 621. The grounds for modification, suspension or revocation include: a) materially false or inaccurate statements in the permit application or supporting papers; b) -failure by the permittee to comply with any terms or conditions of the permit; c) exceeding the scope of the project as described in the permit application; d) newly discovered material information or a material change in environmental conditions,relevant technology or applicable law or regulations since the issuance of the existing permit; e) noncompliance with previously issued permit conditions,orders of the commissioner,any provisions of the Environmental Conservation Law or regulations of the Department related to the permitted activity. DEC PERMIT NUMBER PAGE 4 OF 4 1-4738-02467/00010 i PROPOSED 4'X 108' FIXED TIMBER CATWALK y UTILIZING (4) 10" 0 CCA TIMBER PILINGS (DEPTH OF PENETRATION 10') SEE SHEET 2OF3 o - / , 0 NORTH BAYVIEW DRIVE REVISIONS VA�rO'"TI;� ZONE REV DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED COO REV x`x A. REMOVED BOAT LIFE 06-30-04 TID i� ALAN VIEW: PROPOSED TIMBER CATWALK PURPOSE SAFE RECREATIONAL MOORING SCALE: I" - 200' AT 10995N BAYVIEWRD.SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -SUFFOLK COUNTY N Y APPL CANT _AND USE ECOLOGICAL PREPARED BYOSEPH LAND SEIUDICE ECOLOGICAL SERVICES INC SERVICES INC. DATE; TAX MAP *INFORMATION ON THIS PLAN U BOX 1060 VILLAGE DOCK. 05-05-04 1000-79-5-20 013 REFERENCED FROM THE SURVEY , IVERHEAD.N'(11901 PREPARED BY FOX LAND SURVEYING ON HONE(631)-727-2400 FAX(631)-/27-2605 SHEET SHEET I C 3 7-03-02, LAST REVISED 7-29-02 _ 1 Y J -5 0' -4 0' -3 0' -2 0' OUTHOLD BAY -10MLW IDTH OF WATERWAY: 500' 5' 15' FLOOD EBB 10' NlF TEleanor tl-.Ker�sle� Jamal 17an,,,,h Q P.O.Dox 262 - - �` � Peconic,NY 11958 PROPOSED(4).10"0 CCA IMBER 24.0' - PILINGS (DEPTH OF PEN TRATION 10') STEPS 1 ' Z PROPOSED 'X 108' IXED IMB R -125.7' CATWALK I STAL TION 40 l NOTE: Tidal Wetlands Line is 0 synonymous with the AHWM as observed by Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. 12-03-02 REVISIONS ZONE I REV DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED A. REMOVED BOAT LIF 06-30-04 PLAN VIEW: PROPOSED TIMBER CATWALK 5' PURPOSE SAFE RECREATIONAL MOORING AT 10995N BAYVIEWRD,SOUTHOLD SCALE: I" = 40' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -SUFFOLK COUNTY N Y APPLICANT LAND USE ECOLOGICAL PREPARED BYO LAND UOSEECOLOGICAL SERVICES INC N/P Gliffo(d ff Pulh Cornell SERVICES INC. DATE: TAX MAP # P.O.DOx 9/0 / 1000-79-5-20 013 "INFORMATION ON THIS PLAN - PO BOX 1060 VILLAGE DOCK. 05-03-04 REFERENCED FROM THE SURVEY .5oulholdl,NY/197/ RIVERHEAD•N Y 11901 -- PREPARED BY FOX LAND SURVEYING ON PHONE (631)-727-2400 FAX(631)-727-2605 SHEET SHEET 2 OF 3 7-03-02,LAST REVISED 7-29-02 REVISIONS ZONE REV DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED REMOVED BOAT LIFE 6-30-04 PROPOSED (4)4"X4" TIMBER DOCK PILES (DEPTH OF PENETRATION 6'+) PROPOSED 4'X 108' FIXED TIMBER CATWALK PROPOSED (26) 6"0 CCA TIMBER DOCK PILES PROPOSED (4) 10"0 CCA TIMBER INSTALLATION (ELEVATED 4'ABOVE AHWM) (DEPTH OF PENETRATION 10) PILINGS (DEPTH OF PENETRATION 10') PROP. STEPS EXISTING AHWM GRADE - - - - - ALWM ^ 3 4 cl J 3I ¢ ---------- 101-1v ' =¢I 28, 46'- 851 108, PROPOSED: TIMBER CATWALK SECTION VIEW PURPOSE- SAFE RECREATIONAL MOORING SCALE:I"= S' AT: 10995 N. BAYVIEW RD.,SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -SUFFOLK COUNTY N.Y. APPLICANT:JOSEPH LOGIUDICE *INFORMATION ON THIS PLAN LAND USE ECOLOGICAL PREPARED BY: LAND USE ECOLOGICAL SERVICES INC. REFERENCED FROM THE SURVEY PREPARED BY FOX LAND SERVICES, INC. P O BOX 1060 VILLAGE DOCK DWG.# S.C.T.M.# - SURVEYING ON 7-03-02, LAST RIVERHEAD,NY 11901 B-024 1000-79-5-20.013 REVISED 7-29-02. (631)-727-2400-FAX (631)-727-2605 SCALE: AS NOTED I DATE 05-04-04 1 SHEET: 3 OF 3 LandUse January 12, 2005 Town of Southold Board of Town Trustees P.O. Box 1179 ! D l� Southold,N.Y. 11971 JAN g 2005 Attn: Heather Tetrault Southold Town ' Re: Joseph LoGiudice Proposed Dock BoasdTrustees North Bayview Rd., Southold SCTM# 1000-79-5-20.13 Dear Ms. Tetrault: As per your November 4, 2005 letter to our office enclosed please find the following information: 1. -(6) sets of project plans which indicate sounding depths in the area of the proposed dock. 2. -(6) sets of photographs of the project site with stakes representing the ends of the proposed dock 3. -(6)revised Full Environmental Assessment Forms (F.E.A.F). 4. -(6) aerial photographs of the project site and adjacent shoreline areas. Please note that page 4 of the F.E.A.F item#12 should remain checked no, an open beach area is not a unique or unusual land form. As seen in the enclosed aerial photographs there are several hardened structures present to the east and west of the project site, including a fish trap west of the project site not depicted in these photographs, and an existing dock east of the site. Some of the other structures present include bulkheads, groins, stone armoring, and walkways stairs for beach access. On page 6 of the F.E.A.F. item 14 should remain checked no,-the surface area of Southold Bay will not change by this project. The dock is proposed to be an open piled dock elevated a minimum of 4' above the AHWM and thus will not have an effect on the surface area of Southold 209 West Main Street, 2nd Floor - P.O. Box 1060 - Riverhead, New York - 11901 631-727-2400 - FAX 631-727-2605 � 1 Bay. Please be aware that the use for the proposed dock facility is for a recreational mooring, thus items 19 &20 on page 7 of the L.E.A.F. are checked correctly. The project will not produce odors or noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels. In regards to page 9 of the L.E.A.F. item#8 the proposed action is compatible with adjoining land uses within a 1/4 mile. There is an existing dock facility east of the project site and a basin with mooring facilities, west of the project site there is also an existing boat basin with several mooring facilities. The subject parcel is a waterfront site and a dock is a water dependent use. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if there are any questions or if additional information is required. Sincerely, -��4w Dan Hall Land Use Ecological Services,Inc. DH Enc. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NEW YORK DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS iAGOB-K.JAVITS-FEDERAL-BUILDING NEW YORK,N.Y. 10278-0090 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF. =E--ast-e--r-n=P-e-r.md:-t-s--Se- ti-on SUBJECT: Application Number 2003-00052-1-L2 by- Joseph LoGiudice The New York District, U. S . Army Corps of Engineers, has received a request for Department of the Army authorization for the following activity: • APPLICANT: Joseph LoGiudice —�-0P9_Y5�North-Bayviewr RtFaad Southold, NY 11971 ACTIVITY: Install a 4' x 108 ' fixed timber pier with access steps and a, 181 x 24' eight-pile boatlift as shown on the attached drawings . The purpose of this project is to provide a safe mooring facility. WATERWAY: Southold Bay LOCATION: Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York As this is minor in nature, authorization may be by Letter of Permission. This is in accordance with current Federal Regulations governing work in navigable waters of the United States . To accomplish the coordination required, prior to the 4 issuance of a Letter of Permission, your review of the enclosed drawings is requested. Pursuant to Section 307 (c) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 as amended (16 U. S .C. 1465 (c) (3) (A) ) , the applicant has certified that the activity complies with and will be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved state coastal zone management program. To allow for the timely processing of this application, your comments are requested within 20 days of the date of this letter. If you have any questions, please contact Zarife Koko Cronin, of my staff, at (917) 790-8555 . Sincerely, //iriel G&Vi�ssichelli Acting Chief Eastern Permits Section Enclosures I� ,I I I ' I I I I I N E J� 25 d S E 00 11971 �r SO UT ROLL 4UGAHING �" PROPOSED 4'X 108'FIXED P � i+ L. B TIMBER CATWALK WITH SEE SHEET ,e /f� b BOAT LIFT 2 OF 3 ' .` • (/s O o[[, aBAYVPE `I T N e, !: 01 HOG N GK BA �°_ F` �i 0, BAY �WAY�PRAT Nry P4R.Y NORTH BAYVIEW DRIVE I I I I I I I 51_414 VIEW: PROPOSED TIMBER CATWALK SBDAT LIFT PURPOSE SAFE RECREATIONAL MOORING CALE I" = 200' AT 1OWN BOUT OLD -SUFFOLK TOWN OF-OUTW D S SUFFOLKCOUNTYNY APPLICANT JOSEPH LoG-df c2 1 _ANU USE ECOLOGICAL PREPARED BY LAND USE ECOLOGICAL SERVICES INC 3ERACES INC DATE TAX MAP / 'INFORMATION ON THIS PLAN OL- 8011060 VILLAGE DN, 05-03-04 1000-79-5-20 013 REFERENCED FROM THE SURVEY =RHEAU N 1 11901t'ALIPARED BY FOX LAND SURVEYING ON AI [ ". G(651)fel-2400 FAA(LSU-7U-eM5 SHEET SHEET I OF 3 7-03-02,LAST REVISED 7-29-02 ----------- -- -- ------ ---------- -6 o' - i -5,0' 1 I , ' 40, i f -3 0' -2101 ' OUTHOLD BAY °. /MLW ! IDTH OF WATERWAY:500' / 5' 15' FLOOD EBB 10' PROPOSED B AT LIFT(AL M-A-V TO U " UTILIZING(8) 0"O CCA TI BER `�- NIF PILINGS WIT 4 CRADLE EAMS ND B CABLES( EPTH OF PE ETRA ION 0') Elcanor ti Kc]C4/C(S JOm/tlanaJ�h _ ���` PO DoxZGZ Pccon/c,NY 11958 24 0' _ 18.0 6.0' - `•```�`` • - - I ' STEPS PROPOSED 'X108' IXED IMB R -125.7' 3W CATWALKI STAL TION p NOTE Tidal Wetlands Line Is synonymous with the AHWM as �-\ observed by Land Use Ecological \ ( Services,Inc 12-03-02 wad, PROPOSED TIMBER CATWALK 860 AT UFT - �PLAN VIEW: PURPOSE SAFE RECREATIONAL MOORING nC)� S�(L 5' SCALE I = 40' AT 10995N BAYV EW RD SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY N Y APPLICANT 10SEPHLOGIUDICE �'�1�CLSU�.�Yhf,v� NIF - LAND USE ECOLOGICAL PREPARED BY LAND USE ECOLOGICAL SERVICES INC Clifford BRalhGoarl! SERVICES INC. DATE TAX MAP 8 V 'INFORMATION ON THIS PLAN P000X910 -BOX IOM VILLAGE UDCF 05-03-04 1000-79-5-20 013 REFERENCED FROM THE SURVEY :,ovlhold,W 1197/ _ 1 1 J,VERHEAD N]I19DI SHEET PREPARED BY FOX LAND SURVEYING ON LINNE(53U]21-CLOD FA%{03n R]-z«5 SHEET 2 OF 3 7-03-02,LAST REVISED 7-29-02 I ` I REVISIONS r ZONE REV DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED PROPOSED(4)4"X4"TIMBER DOCK PILES t (DEPTH OF PENETRATION 6'+) d PROPOSED(26)6"0 CCA TIMBER DOCK PILES PROPOSED 4'X 108'FIXED TIMBER CATWALK dPROPOSED BOAT LIFT(ALUM—A—VATOR) INSTALLATION(ELEVATED 4'ABOVE AHWM) (DEPTH OF PENETRATION 10') UTILIZING(8)10"0 CCA TIMBER PILINGS WITH 4 CRADLE BEAM&AND ,r 8 CABLES(DEPTH OF PENETRATION 10') PROP STEPS E ISTING, "GRADE ALWM 3 $ e 3I a —10— < 28' 46' 85' 108' , • '411�ctSur2vN-ev\f� as nv�� PROPOSED TIMBER CATWALK&BOAT LIFT SECTION VIEW PURPOSE SAFE RECREATIONAL MOORING SCALE:1^=S• AT 10995 N BAYVIEW RD,SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -SUFFOLK COUNTY N Y APPLICANT JOSEPH Le6°dCe- LAND USE ECOLOGICAL PREPARED BY LAND USE ECOLOGICAL SERVICES INC INFORMATION ON THIS PLAN REFERENCED FROM THE SURVEYSERVICES.INC. (I P O BOX 1060 VILLAGE DOCK S C T M# 7 PREPARED BY FOX LAND DWG# SURVEYING ON 7-0302,LAST RNERHEAD,NY 17901 8-024 100079-5-20 Ota REVISED 7-29-02 Lfiat)az7•zaoo-FAx 7 t6zt}7z7-z6M VAL AS NOTED DATE 05-04-04 1 SHEET 3 OF 3 `� 69ra 0 , 00 10401 Aerogrark;cs Cocp. ,¢mK JAN Southold Town �r. Board of Trustees v� y Yx r - .n e r s .z . �La 6;vA; POLrc��� • r Arc l� �, x °., �� •r : � �; is - r , s. Asa tY. _ ( - �. t Zlz 4rf a PO _ :F Ail - .�y. l }� s f R. A s y. y : r,. . k r 1��s1 a . I • w f " > 4. ` r • 4 i - • s r - �v. .;1�, : �. -'•'! �.•� ;..civ- �r �' - 7 > p . v , l JK ? 4f ti Mobil— _ th •d jp7 t�t�+�Go�a�l oo-N-� 1 PROPOSED 4'X 108' FIXED TIMBER CATWALK y UTILIZING (4) 10" 0 CCA TIMBER PILINGS (DEPTH J OF PENETRATION 10') SEE SHEET 2OF3 �> '\ � / 4 , 1, O i \ 1 AN 1 9 2005 Y IbmO' NORTH BAYVIEW Southold Town DRIVE Board of Trustees V REVISIONS 1 ZONE REV DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED REMOVED .80AT-.UF7:�,-., FAVIGWi R�2f3P0$ER TIMBER CATWALK �••' ' Pk�EzPb$E:,SAFE RECREATIONAL MOORING SCALE: I" = 200' AT-.10995N BAYVIEW RD,SOUTHOLD _ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -SUFFOLK COUNFY°N:Y f�pPIICANT;JOSEPHLpG1UDICE L'ANf) USE ECOLOGICAL PREPARED BY LAND USE ECOLOGICAL SERVICES INC - SERVICES INC. :; air: „ M •fAX MAP INFORMATION .ti• Pgt bx loeo VILE — — 'a_• 00=79-5-20.013 = TION ON THIPI�3N M@; AGE DOCK, ( 0.3 04 _ REFERENCED FROM T ,§ RVEY' _ - - RIVERHEAD,N Y,11901 { PHONE(631)-727-24 us_ - ;SHEET SH - PREPARED BY FOX LANDSGRVEYING ON 0o FAX ce3l)-727-2605 --� - SHEET I OF 3 7-03-02, LAST REVISED'?-2g=02 - - v , / '-601 v -5 0' e7 -4 0' -3 0' -2 0' OUTHOLD BAY -10' MLW IDTH OF WATERWAY: 500' 5' 15' ' FLOOD EBB � 10' Eleanor r sfer&Jana/Manassah = P,O,Dox 262 Q f econic,NY 1158 PROPOSED (4) 10"0 CCA IMBER 24,0' PILINGS (DEPTH OF PEN TRATION 10) STEPS 2 \� PROPOSED 'X 108' IXED IMB R125.7' 3 CATWALK I STAL TION o NOTE: Tidal Wetlands Line is O synonymous with the AHWM as observed by Land Use Ecological - Services, Inc. 12-03-02 REVISIONS ZONE REV DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED A. REMOVED B'OAT LIFT TIONAL 06-30-04 ERCATWALKROPOSED TIMB�T�N tlI6 ■: %IEEE J' PURPOSE: SAFE RECREA _s �'"" 3'S:•es,'t'. G:' i. :;iiYe:,' SCALE: I�� = 40' _ AT:10995 N BAYVIEW RD;SOUTHQG�. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -SUFFOLK'COUN7Y N•Y / , LAND USE EC:OL /� 1-CAL APPLICANT JOSEPH LO sw N�F ^ X71- AL PREPARED BY:LAND USE,EC(}; ( 1jL SERVICES INC. = __ _ _ _ •_ _ _ m _ _ d ff U - 'i P lh Orne/l - - 8-EV VICES E - S , INC"'N • wi'. . �DATE: _- TAX MAP #� - - -- -- -: - -- - :i� ,f,O,Dox 9/0 '; Po - _ _ '' _ "INFORMATIONiOi\F.`CHIS PLAN } �' `� BOX 1060 VILLAGE DOCK, --. 05 03 04 Tom'`_ 1000-79-5-20.013 - = - _ �ti; _ — REFERENC TH S,URVEY - - `�otilhold, lleY/l RIVERHEAD a a u _ Ea �3 w ,N.Y-11901 r'a F xX;+, • , _ ; SH'EE , PREPARED`& O LA1VD SURVEYING ON HONE(631)-727-2400 FAX`( 'f�l21 2605' __ SHEET f- H^ ' ;` & 63 x e aTy_. s OF 3 -oa-o2,�,srurs � -2s-o2 �fz - _ - -. ,- _:,'S`h(= - ^ --"^=Y'r'`- - -'G.•�Nrv_ _ - ,. -,- ''x31�'-a,iw�t. - _ __ __ a :F,..,-�4_M`•y,. _ r • REVISIONS r ZONE REV DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED REMOVED BOAT LIFE 6-30-04 PROPOSED (4)4"X4"TIMBER DOCK PILES (DEPTH OF PENETRATION 6'+) PROPOSED 4'X 108' FIXED TIMBER CATWALK PROPOSED (26) 6-0 CCA TIMBER DOCK PILES PROPOSED (4) 10"0 CCA TIMBER INSTALLATION (ELEVATED 4'ABOVE AHWM) (DEPTH OF PENETRATION 10') PILINGS (DEPTH OF PENETRATION 10) PROP, STEPS EXISTING AHWM GRADE ALWM 3 N 3 10' zl28' _461- 85'- 108, 6' 85'108' PROPOSED: TIMBER CATWALK SECTION VIEW PURPOSE: SAFE RECREATIONAL MOORING :. AT: 10995 N.$AYVIEYt=2D.F ,.'«x '•S YS:sr.`c.'�, ,1�;,,.�.'; ;,�•",._o,-c�.` c '+S �, .,. J.,'':, _ - .� •}°�J .��r;v 'S r;�;2,"xry SCALL 1.�,�,� � ,Sr.^,,•;Si4:„: r �_- : • :s,• •w'ft::�,.,o ; •. ” °. �,' TOWN OF`60UTHOLD ' FOLk COUNTY N.Y. _ _ f�- .>F - -f�- _ �z�„ - -�*-•� -_ - _ _ - _ - ,ts � _ �: �;:�.` APPLICANT:JOSEP'i�y'-k. ,t�l�lal,�E _ _• ',.,:., r` P�'-,� "INFORMATION ON THIS.P-LAN - LAND USE EC LOjoICd►L PREPARED BY:LAND•U.E-•ECOLOGICAL SERVICES INC. _ EFERENC-ED 1' � SOIRVEY_ _ , - __- - - - SM EPAREDB- _PRP EV _a .`E. DOCKDWG.# SURVEY0.603 f ylc 1 ,- T.N1 r t B-024 0.013 7 10, -_ r., rr :�i;. _ ��; =�;�:�.�• ,. ..�4o..�r ,, SHEET. 3 OF 3 SCALE:AS NOTED. =[ tlk• _ " _ r. �'=`_ -µs-•.'- lRu _ - - - ^::?: - - _`�b'A�ti=w=__ -iTt.�x..r!-�i.-' _ ..f� L"'^_•.:.t'a_- _ - .rf'. ' -t '3"�..•1.0 -n ..S'"`l :Ay �'Si� 'r'a:i:' .--i%:>;n"v.� • -n._ __r1S.:Ss3:'±Si:i. n_ JSijsC.Y:t'_.-� `.. .'.`rfi_.-Ai'y _ .. t5.v _ - �- - ^..M1•• zV�:`Y _ L;°` • a V..�.I=r.rwe S.. Y vi'.; %S._. 0tJ,4rF4u00 u�.in r0:.)0041 oLimmv ur imujir-r-.7 `rrut u� Board of Trustecs 6$ Sept. 22, 2004 new retaining wall; place 1,500 to 1,800 pound boulders in front of new retaining wall; reconstruct existing $.5' by 20' stairs; construct a new set of 5.5' by 201stairs on the south side of the property; remove and dispose of a total of 107'of bulkhead and construct a total of 107' of bulkhead using C-Loc 4500 vinyl sheathing; remove and dispose of the most seaward 20' section of existing jetty and construct a new 20' section of jetty using C-Loc 4500 vinyl sheathing; remove and dispose of a 35' section of bulkhead and construct a new 36 section of bulkhead using C-Lac 4500 vinyl sheathing. Located: 405 Kimberley Lane, Southold. SCTM 70-13-20.3 and 20.4. TRUSTEE KING: Is there anyone here who would like to speak in favor of this application? MR. COSTELLO: George Costello, Senior, representing Mr. Laoudis. Sack in August 30th of this year, I had a one line recommendation from the DEC and that was to restore the existing jetty to the original height, and I think that's what Mrs. Dickerson asked me at the last public hearing, that was all they said, TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is that shown on the plans? MR. COSTELLO; Yes. TRUSTEE KING: If there's no other comments, 191 make a motion to close the public hearing. TRUSTEE DICKERSON. Second. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: All in favor? ALL AYES. TRUSTEE KING: I'll make a motion to approve the application as stated. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Second. TRUSTEE KING: All in favor? ALL AYES, 19. Land Use Ecological Services, Inc, on behalf of JOSEPH K. LOGIUDICE requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 4' by 108'fixed timber catwalk with a boat-lift. The catwalk is proposed to be elevated a minimum of 4' above the apparent high water mark and will utilize four 4" by 4" piles with a depth of penetration 6' plus, and (26) 6"diameter timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10' plus. The boat lift is proposed to be an "Alum-A-Vator" utilizing (s) 10" diameter timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10' plus. Located: 10995 North Bayview Road, Southold. SCTM #79-5-20.13. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone who would like to speak on behalf of this application? MR. HALL: Yes, Dan Hall with Land Use. Boat lift has been removed from the project,just four 10"diameter tie-off nl l L(I Lr3C70 U7:"Jr] (0t)0041 nuFAmv Ur I rl=I mmn t iiUt bL Board of Trustees 66 Sept. 22, 2004 piles, and since the last meeting, which I guess had been tabled, we went out and did Some site investigations on the bottom sediment and observations, and we submitted a letter to that on August 8th indicating there was a concern regarding some eel grass that washed up. And we looked around with masks. I went there a couple times, we couldn't find any eel grass growing on or near the site, and the sediment on the site was consistently coarse sand and rocks, had some algae and seaweed growing on it, which is not consistent with transporting sand in the area of the proposed dock. I'll answer any questions the Board might have regarding this. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: I guess we were mistaken. It was sodium grass that was growing out there, not eel grass. We assumed it was eel grass because there was about a 3 inch mound of eel grass up and down the shoreline, so we looked out and saw this massive vegetation, and it ended up being sodium, which is equally important because it does provide sanctuary for scallops to set on. MIS. HALL: We didn't observe anything other than sea lettuce on the bottom in the area of the dock. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: We had our environmental technician look at the site. She took 100 foot by 100 foot sample of the site, which she sampled and found several species there. She found sodium fragile, filamentous red algae, channeled whelk, spider crabs, hermit crabs, sand crabs, lady crabs, crepidula fornicate, large shell clams, razor clams, large schools of silversides (Menidia menidia), ghost shrimp, tube worms, Sounds like quite a bit. I MR. HALL: I'm sure in a 104' by 100' area anywhere in the bay you would find those species, I would imagine. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: That would probably be the area impacted by a vessel and a dock. TRUSTEE DICKERSON: My biggest concern in this particular application is that its area of unaltered shoreline, and that it's very pristine, and there's not a lot of docks and that one of the main goals of the Peconic Estuary program is no net shore increase of hardened shoreline in the Peconic Estuary. Who looked at this? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I did. I'm just trying to move it along. MR. HALL: There's some grains associated with the inlet, to the west, and to the east there's another dock. I don't know how far away it is. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: There is one dock for down to the east, and that dock I fished out in those waters for the last 20 rpt I c e i zau6 u3.03 t6Ob64.i buHNU ut 1&U6 iLLL fHydL u,3 F� BoTrustees 67 Sept. 22,2004 years. I've never seers a boat docked alongside that dock yet. That guy has a rubber dingy, when he comes in with his vessel, he anchors it probably 000 feet offshore, and he runs a rubber raft to that dock, which, in that case-- MR. HALL: There's four feet of water depth at the end of the dock. So at least two and-a-half feet separation between the boat there and the bottom. MS. TETRAULT: Just notice from what I gave you too just had some of the things to keep in mind is the location because there have been docks around the corner that in ice and storms they have just tom out and washed up down the beach. So it's a pretty bad location as far as the northeast. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Some of those pilings from the docks around the comer are just east of Cedar Beach, They're sitting on the beach, MS. TETRAULT: They're still there from two winters ago. 1 think that, and what Peggy said in the new code there's all kinds of things about keeping the beaches that don't have docks without docks. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: if there's no other comment. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: There's one other important comment to mention that there is a fish trap out there, and this dock will likely have an impact on the fishery of that fish trap. MR. HALL: Its pretty far-to the northwest. I saw it. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Not that far away. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I make a motion to close the hearing. TRUSTEE DICKERSOW Second. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: All in favor? ALL AYES TRUSTEE kRUPSKI: We're going to reserve judgment on this. We're not going to vote tonight. Reserve our decision. 20: Land Use Ecological Service, Inc., on behalf of:SKUNK LANE TRUST C/O BRADLEY AND MARY KRAUSE requests a Wetland Permit to construct a timber catwalk with ladder at the end of the catwalk. Located: 9105 Skunk Lane, Cutchogue. SCTM # 104-3018.1. TRUSTEE KING: Is there anyone here to comment? MR. HALL: Dan Hall of Land Use. I believe this is what was discussed on in the field. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: This is what we discussed, we met with Kelly in the field. TRUSTEE KING: , If there's no other comments, I make a motion to close the hearing. TRUSTEE DICKERSON: Second. TRUSTEE POLIWODA: All in favor? ALL AYES. 7/15/04 Field Inspection v, 0 a 0 i ,� r • r �F.,. - •. ��-, r s' 1 .. Abb '»� �'-" ..+ � ' - '�. -• , .� ••� -� • fit �-.��� � • + • ,y f til++,� '' ol F fIQ I a ,�,_ •. np -�;` "F '• '� �b ___ �a�� '��-moi+ • y 3 y t .4* s R"�� ► a.. July 19, 2005 Field InspeclAlw' } , 7W I - _ 4 zr *, �n ................. ALI' Se C'D n O 7/15/04 Field Inspection a R . ? e a§ , ` a �� ,obi�� "��,,,,� "�^«u. ya � ,. •"� �a as t�, � �` � ,X '9�i $�• ""awd� � � r�.c �•,�„¢mss a ���� �. t '� ;� { � Fa�"� , " M r � a 7/15/04 Field Inspection � Y m �� - Oil r ,a. a "�" ✓ 3 a. t T` �� � '.„.� -"fir x��� �, $s".. +'�'� l / 1 1 Lan , se, August 8,2004 V E Town of Southold SEP - 9 2004 Board of Trustees 53095 Main RoadSOuthold Town P.O. Box 1179 Board of Trustees Southold,NY 11971 Attn: Albert J. Krupski,President Re: Joseph LoGiuduce,North Bayview Road, Southold SCTM# 1000-79-5-20.13 Proposed Dock Dear Mr. Krupski: Please note that our office has made several recent sub-tidal investigations at the above referenced project site and have made the following observations. There are no Zostera beds observed at or immediately adjacent to the area for the proposed dock. The bottom composition at and adjacent to the project site consists primarily of coarse sand and stones. As such,there was no evidence of sediment transport at or immediately adjacent to the project site as limited sand volumes were observed at the site. Sea Lettuce (Ulva sp.) and species of algae were observed colonizing the rocky substrate. Enclosed please find(3)photographs at the project site indicating existing bottom composition at the project site. If there are any questions or if additional information may be required please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Dan Hall Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. DH Enc. P.O. Box 1060 • Village Dock, Riverhead, New York • 11901 631-727-2400 • FAX 631-727-2605 wE LoGiudiee - Southold SEr - 9 X004 Southold Town Photographs of existing bottom: Board of Trustees LoGiudice - Southold Photographs of existing bottom: 0 0 LoGiudice - Southold 7-23-04 Looking west from project site. 7-23-04 Looking east from project site. x - LoGiudice - Southold 7-23-04 r - t Project site - looking south. 7-23-04 Project site looking north. LoGiudice - South' Bo 'Y of Trustees 7-23-04 Looking west from project site. 7-23-04 Looking east from project site. W;rr LoGiudice - Southold 7-23-04 ` Project site . looking south. 7-23-04 Project site looking north. _ . J ' I Telephone p Town Hall (631)765-1892 W 53095 Route 25 Q P. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL TOWN OF SOUTHOLD At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Tuesday, June 15, 2004, the following recommendation was made: Moved by Don Wilder, seconded by Doris. McGreevy, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees DISAPPROVAL of the Wetland Permit application of JOSEPH K. LOGIUDICE to construct a 4'X 108' fixed timber catwalk with a boat-lift. The catwalk is proposed to be elevated a min. of 4' above the AHWM and will utilize (4) 4"X 4" piles with a depth of penetration 6'+, and (26) 6" dia. timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10'+. The boat-lift is proposed to be an "Alum-A-Vator" utilizing (8) 10" dia. timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10'+. Located: 10995 North Bayview Rd., Southold. SCTM#79-5-20.13 The CAC recommends Disapproval of the application because boats-lifts are prohibited in Chapter 97 of the Wetland Code. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried D-9ev5a96 0 97 i2 I w-2o-9 N,BAYVIfW N ILLD ' t • RD. 1 0-2D-90 X3.9 �• CT00 z s Ll1lt J-05- /t LOA 16 73 J `YrJ -a l0 - -o1 e %D3-01 - LOA(C) �. ` e • q` v Hp 45 BAY O ♦ • 3 °° u a w ti 13 s ANC R al s 41 ) 9 � 39 .3 x.. 9isrot 9 $ lam o 1t30 ND oT .2 �? 6 �LSMEtMFiur---- W 2 7.4md 3.2 �2 29 v x` a yA. ') Iz o. 8 9 1.29.) Ie 2Mc1 371 m 37 r]6 20.10 0 ` 11 17 IJ f 11 10 75 .a o. LOA 20.9 NOTE. r ` 2e (So/ AN APPARENT OVERLAP 1 14 ' X32 ae E 49 IU )A( CORION EMTS I. 0 ..7 •17.9 3. • ` BETWEEN PARCELS • 27 17.2 17.11 • 33 079-02-00110 933 ax en 50 ' &07e-0a-021.11 15 A 12A(cl g a x a 67 -� R 16 JI ~17.e 51 20.11 20.e V • 17, 71 20.12 2.2A 2.2A 35 m 52 I 30 IMA zal 0 -N- w 3 67 1.3A(U I 1-OA 36 ae 9 +1 7 -7 O rt[bc 1uo las* a fO &. 17..♦ r 51 • 27 -J7 nn 0 28 C c s ; u o ss I.711c1 \ :n �17.6 27 66 1 20 - qr._ h, 'R ' Si M I7Y0 2, J9� 131 c7 � SO 5 Ia6u.. _ a 7 IS 17.17 y'� W I 1.2m.) LOA(cl E ISI r L1A • r 373A(U 0.0A ° ~ 27 r 2 a�m l42 A 42® 22 61 `u O 33 1.14.5 Ca 1&3 I 1 19 1.LA �1 1&7 ' LO r 22.1 1.01 r 21 62 a 12 1JAIcl ♦ 16.4 v ' 17 LIA(c) 3 .B I� 17 9 20 2 67 .e 211 1&6 163 i-- .3AIU ' w ' n 19 V 9 61 19'w �� 10 2.Mc1 - 11 r m a 11 O O I a w 7.1 O 20.13 s _ eirlio 16-, z/pA I i• N eAxvE9 19 65 66 L.MU L2AIU L2MU SOA _ 20.5 1&1 2.1 3.2 L. 16 r �• '• ` 10 tMEx soya A6Ey I1# 161(cl LSA(U I.SA(U L511c1 I.SAIcI L5Afc1 ` a1 1 2 ' r x " " " r • .0. 2)1 LIA(t) L02 7 1 6 6 )I °' en NE B I 9 io 11 12 B• 13 52 sl 51 r r w 7y20 RLI w 3.AA 12.2 9 'a © 29 o I ;3 a 11 91 2 w 18A 16 e L1 e o a7 v. m� 2-W.,LTY 7 1 ZJA 30 J A. ` + 'Y !9 75ry1 s rqa • J! 2+ 27 O IS _ +m m �m_ x1 yo 244 2s s u N0. ¢ 1B 21 28 ♦ 32 0. ♦ 19 `w !6 g 70.OMU FOR PCL x `� u pfr. u t) ¢ 26' O las /` L 27 oe Lr is 6 a• SEE SM III. -005 li 22 ¢ b ♦ 'WARD `'6 ♦ y NQ 4 61 13.1 F 25 Q ` y ♦ Ll�l ;I.I 07.1 17 ti0 12.. b 221 1L3A 4 R 11 e a 1B' 4t1 ♦ / 6 1j 62 4.1 12.3 ® / $ 73 M D z. v 3� � � m e., a6A l / ° RO 31 3. 9 • J I c Is'6 t/T 252 L' Js /1-I3 I'7• k IISMU $ >69 to �` .• 1RATCH-�- u4 0.66 tl a MATCH --� LINE SEE SEC.N0.Oe9 °•67 SEE SEC.N0.OOO .. _ -. . . -..,e,._.. ,_._ _._v...,:... ,....::...�,•. nc _ U 5 ,C,.--. RL _ .. .>, �.OF7HDLD - SECTION NO MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS * Southold, NY 119710 SO P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE Chair 4D OFFICE LOCATION:3 WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H.SIDOR (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) GEORGE D.SOLOMON couno, Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Town of Southold Board of Trustees E C E 0 U E From: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner LWRP Coordinator SEP 12 2005 Date: September 8, 2005 Southold Town Board of Trustees Re: Proposed Permit to Construct a Dock for Logiudice in Bay SCTM#1000-79-5-20.13 This proposal is to construct a fixed open walkway 4 x 108' with(4)tie-off piles. The catwalk is proposed to be elevated a minimum of 4' above the AHWM and will utilize (4) 4"x 4"piles with a depth of penetration of 6' and 26 (6") diameter timber piles with a depth penetration of 10' . Four 10" diameter CCA timber tie off piles are also proposed. The action is located within Southold Bay in REACH 7. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 95, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP)Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with the following LWRP Policy Standards; 1, 3,3.1 (A) (D) (J) (VL 3),4.1 (A), 5.3 (C), 6.1 (A.2,A. 3 and 13.3), 8.3 (A, B and E), 9.1(C-2 , C-3 and E), 9.2 (A..1 and 3), 9.3 (A, and E),9.4 (A, B, E.1,E.2,E.3 and EA), 9.5, 10.3, 10.4 (A,B and Q, 11.1 and 11.2 therefore INCONSISTENT with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan. The LWRP does not support the construction of docks or structures in Southold Bay and therefore, there is no opportunity for the proposed action to be modified and become consistent with the LWRP. Correspondingly the LWRP recommends the use of"alternatives to long piers or docks include use of dinghies to reach moored boats and mooring in nearby marinas". Pursuant to Chapter 95, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. TIaICIA C. 1VIOOI2E ® Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 JUL 2 7 2005 Tel: (631')765-4330 7 Fax: (631)765-4643 Southold Town Board of Trustees 11:�Q,; July 27, 2005 HAND DELIVERED Mark Terry, Southold Town Planner Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 RE: LOGIUDICE -LWRP PREMISES: 10995 N. BAYVIEW ROAD, SOUTHOLD Dear Mr. Terry: With reference to the above, please be advised that I have been retained by Joseph and MaryEllen Loguidice. I am enclosing a copy of their authorization for your files. I am also enclosing the following: 1. LWRP Consistency Assessment form, including Project Description 2. NYS DOS determination 3. NYS DEC Permit If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you. Very truly yours, PATRICIA C. MOORE PCM/bp C: Mr. And Mrs. Joseph Loguidice Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended ,to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer'of this form should review the exempt minor-action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront" Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as t6 its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this'form is'answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent, to 'the maximum extent practicable.-with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions;it shall not be undertaken.' A copy of the LWRP is available'in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net),the Board of Trustees Office,the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town,Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000 _ 79 . t _ 5 - 20.13- The 0.13-The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Dept. ❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees 0 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): 1 (a) Action undertaken directly'by Town agency(e.g. capital ❑ construction,planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) ❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan,subsidy] (c) Permit, approval, license,certification:, ❑ Nature and extent of action: ' Proposed Dock (Please See Attached Project Description,-_), 1 Logiudice - Southold Project Description: Applicant proposes to construct a recreational dock facility consisting of a 4'x 108'fixed timber catwalk with(4)tie-off piles. The catwalk is proposed to be elevated a minimum of 4' above the AHWM and will utilize (4)4"x4" piles with a depth of penetration 6'+, and (26) 6" Dia. timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10'+. (4) 10" Dia. CCA timber tie-off piles are proposed. Location of action: - 10995 North Bayview Rd. Southold, NY Site acreage: 8.00 Acres Present land use: Residential Present zoning classification: R-40 2. 'If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Joseph K. LoGiudice (b) Mailing address: 4062 Grumman Blvd., Bldg.74 Calverton, NY 11933-1502 (c) Telephone number:Area Code( ) (631 ) 208-2933 (d) Application number,if any: none- Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding, o approv y a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No❑ If yes,which state or federal agency? NYSDEC, NYSDOS, USACOE DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community,character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes ❑ No [:] Not Applicable This prolect complies with this policy, The proposed dock will enhance the community character as4la shoreline community and will be a beneficial use of this coastal location. This proiect is the minimal development required to provide safe and adequate access and storage of a recreational vessel, thus__ rservin_ _opej, space:__= Similar structures -as' -the proposed exist throughout Southold Bay and within close,PrOXIMUy to the jro3 e6 site. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III-Policies Pages 3 through•6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable This project will comply withitthis policy., Although not having a direct affect on the hist-nrin and archeolQgical m-,ources r -,ourof Southold Town, this project will preserve traditional usP� which t3PfinP i-hn maritima harnctpr of the area and iri orpprate a design which is in ch racl-Pr with trard;t;r n, e- Attach additional,sheets if necessai- , Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable This project complies with this- policv. This project is a traditional pattern of development, maritime activity, and is one of the mpQr'tan n; omWnents of the Town of Southold. This project is the minimal structure required for safe and adequate access-;o d storage of a recreational vessel The dock is an open pile deli le�mtea 41 above the AHWM to help preserve and protect the intertidal and benthic ecosystems Similar structures exist in Southold Bay and within close proximity of theproject site Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion: See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria © Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable This project will comply with this policy. The proposed dock has been designed to withstand any ti cial or wavc- ari-inn Thi r h mi q_bt be generated in theylClnl+-rClf the si to This proj ec`t wi 1 1 not muss an i ni.ro f Progi nn nr fl nnrli ng at nr a1-li anent to the protect site. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply_ in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes ❑ No ❑Not Applicable This project will not have any adverse impacts to the water quality and supply in Southold _Town_ Onlydigin rnng nT tion artivitiiaa might thara tw te_TnWora•_ minimal detrimental impacts to Southnl d Ray from siltation accninatPA with cont �i +-• 1, 7tS I Ll�l 1 1 Jl l 1 1 Yti This - impact would be temporary and localized to the project site vicinity. Thus, this project complies with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes [:] No[:] Not Applicable This ptoject complies 'witht his policy. The proposed dock will not have any megative effects on the ecosystems including the significant fish and wildlife habitats of Southold Bay and associated wetlands. The dock has been designed to reduce any impacts by being open pile design and elevated a minimum of 4' aboxam the AHEM Qnl,r imi ncr nnnGtru HOD activities does the ssihility exist for minimal tem orarV,_and Irv,=1 impartrA completed the dock will provide habitat for several marine flora and fauna. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy T. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation Criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No❑ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town,of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No © Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III=Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes❑ No❑ Not Applicable This project complies with this policy. This project allows for public access and t erex fare as the dockks =nr=nnstal to hPqin just landward of the AHWM This project will riot impede 11POn pu l;c aCe�ss in Southold Bay, and will not infringe upon navigation. Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See L'WRP Section III-Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No'❑ Not Applicable This Proiect is congirlt-rpa, _-j w,�4e_r dependent use and this paj:i:ey. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable This project complies with this policy. The project is an open pilewM6cM4elevated 4' above the AHWM and will not have any negative affect on the longterm maintenance and health of living marine resources. This project being a recreational dock aci i y will promote the use of marine resources Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through'65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ -No FX� Not Applicable 'Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No ❑x Not'Applicable Created on,5/25/0511:20 AM Town of Southold ' LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net),the Board of Trustees Office,the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000 _ 79 _ 5 - 20.13 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Dept. ❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees 0 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action.(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital ❑ construction,planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) ❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant,loan,subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: 0 Nature and extent of action: Proposed Dock (Please See Attached Project Description ) Logiudice o Southold Project Description: Applicant proposes to construct a recreational dock facility consisting of a 4'x108'fixed timber catwalk with(4)tie-off piles. The catwalk is proposed to be elevated a minimum of 4' above the AHWM and will utilize(4)4"x4"piles with a depth of penetration 6'+, and (26) 6" Dia. timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10'+. (4) 10" Dia. CCA timber tie-off piles are proposed. Location of action: 10995 North Bayview Rd. Southold, NY Site acreage: 8.00 Acres Present land use: Residential Present zoning classification: R-40 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Joseph K. LoGiudice (b) Mailing address: 4062 Grumman Blvd., Bldg.74 Calverton, NY 11933-1502 (c) Telephone number: Area Code( ) (631 ) 208-2933 (d) Application number,if any: none Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,o approval y a state or federal agency? Yes 0 No❑ If yes,which state or federal agency? NYSDEC, NYSDOS, USACOE DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable This project complies with this policy. The proposed dock will enhance the community character as°ia shoreline community, and will be a beneficial use of this coastal location. This project is the minimal development required to provide safe and adequate access and storage of a recreational vessel, thus-preserving-openspace. Similar structures as the_one -proposed exist throughout Southold Bay and within close proxuni y to the proTec site. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable This project will comply with.'-this policy. Although not having a direct affect on the historic and archeolo iral reso„rr-as of Southold Town, this project will preserve traditional ugpq whiRh define the maritime haractPr of the area and incorporate a design which is in character wi th tra(9i i-i onal ilea Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable .This project complies with this policy. This project is a traditional pattern of development, maritime activity, and is one of the impQrtant S=ic omnonpnt of the Town of Southold. This project is the minimal structure required for safe and adequate access and storage of a recreational vessel The dQck is an op r pied Ginn elevated 4' above the AHWM to help preserve and protect the intertidal and benthic ecosystems. Similar structures exist in Southold Bay and within close proximity of the project site Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria © Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable This project will comply with this policy. The proposed dock has been designed to withstand any tidal or wave action whi rrh Might hePa -rRtpCli n the vi cinityof the ci to This xxroj ec•t wi 1 1 not rano- an i nr-r pacr- of ernGi nn nr fl nodi nn at nr add ac-ent to the project site. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes ❑ No ❑Not Applicable This project will not have any adverse impacts to the water quality and supply in Southold Town- Onl v dllri nq �nnctr-iir.ti nn acti tai hoc mi gbt there he temporary minimal detrimental_ impacts tQ Southold Bay from siltation associated with con +-ruci-i c •+ This impact would be temporary and localized to the project site vicinity. Thus, this project complies with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section HI—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No❑ Not Applicable This project complies witht his policy. The proposed dock will not have anymegative effects on the ecosystems including the significant fish and wildlife habitats of Southold Bay and associated wetlands. The dock has been designed to reduce any impacts by being open pile design and 1yatpd a minimum of 4' ahmve tbt- pHW 0n1 V �d�ng r,onci-v.ucti nn activities does the txoSGi h;1 i t-V exi.-:t for mi ni mal f temporary, and 1 oral J-7 imparrt ori completed the dock will provide habitat for several marine flora and fauna. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No © Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑x Yes❑ No❑ Not Applicable This project complies with this policy. This project allows for public access and hE)rfare as the dock is pr zT sed to hagi n Just landward of the AHWM This prof ect will not imppdp11?Mpuhlir access in Southold £say, and will not infringe upon navigation. Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable This Project is considerx-A ;:, water dependent use and thus wjj:j compj_y with th,:s P01:4:ey. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable This project complies with this policy. The project is an open pile-'-ddck--::,elevated 4' above the AHWM and will not have any negative affect on the longterm maintenance and health of living marine resources. This project being a recreational doc face i y will promote the use of marine resources Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No E Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No ❑x Not Applicable Created on 5125105 11:20 AM PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Tel: (631)765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 July 27, 2005 HAND DELIVERED ® E C E Southold Town Trustees Main Road JUL 2 7 2005 PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 Southold Town Board of Trustees RE: LOGIUDICE - DOCK PERMIT PREMISES: 10995 N. BAYVIEW ROAD, SOUTHOLD Dear Sir or Madam: With reference to the above, please be advised that I have been retained by Joseph and MaryEllen Loguidice. I am enclosing their authorization for your files. Also enclosed please find the following: 1. Memorandum to Mark Terry 2. LWRP Consistency Assessment form, including Project Description 3. NYS DOS determination 4. NYS DEC Permit If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you. Very,truly yours, ,''PATRICIA C. MOORE PCM C. Mr. -Mrs. Joseph Loguidice Joseph&MaryEllen LoGiudice 10995 N. Bayview Rd. Southold NY 11971 July 22, 2005 �n Southold Town Trustess (; Q V Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971s, J U L 2 7 ?n05 C'01" ,"'1 T„^In RE: JOSEPH&MARYELLEN LOGIUDICE PREMISES: 10995 N. Bayview Road, Southold, New York SCTM: 10995 N. Bayview Road, Southold,New York Dear Sir or Madam: Please be advised that my husband and I have this date retained the legal services of Patricia C. Moore and is authorized to appear on our behalf and ask that all future correspondence be forwarded to her for her review and comment. Her name and address is as follows: PATRICIA C. MOORE 51020 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD NY 11971 TEL#765-4330 FAX#765-4643 Very truly yours, XX� Mary llen LoGuidice C: Land Use PATRICIA A.FINNEGAN 1 `�- JOSHUA Y.HORTON TOWN ATTORNEY ®SUF�D���O Supervisor patricia.finnegan@town.southold.ny.us Town Hall Annex, 54375 Route.25 KIIERAN M. CORCORAN y P.O. Box 1179 ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY v.-? Southold, New York 11971-0959 kieran.corcoran@town.southold.ny.us , • �� LORI HULSE MONTEFUSCO .( ��® Telephone (631) 765-1939 Facsimile (631) 765-6639 ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY lori.montefusco@town.southold.ny.us OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 6, 2005 ; ® E C E nn E. Mr. Dan Hall Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. JUL ® 8 2005 04 P.O. Box 1060 209 West Main Street, 2"d Floor Southold Town Riverhead, NY 11901 Board of Trustees Re: Joseph LoGiudice/Proposed Dock Premises: 10995 North Bayview Road, Southold, NY SCTM No. 1000-79-5-20.13 Dear Mr. Hall: Thank you for your correspondence dated June 30, 2005, with respect to the application of Joseph LoGiudice before the Southold Town Board of Trustees and its compliance with the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP). Please note that the Board of Trustees is prohibited by the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law from approving any project without making a determination that the proposed project is consistent with the LWRP. According to that law, found at Chapter 95 of the Town Code, an applicant must submit a Coastal Assessment Form to the relevant agency for a consistency recommendation by the Town's designated consistency coordinator. It appears that you were forwarded a copy of the appropriate form on May 31, 2005. If you have not done so already, please submit the completed form to the Trustees' office for processing. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at the above number. rr ly rsM. Corcoran nt Town Attorney KMC/lk cc: Board of Trustees ✓ Mr. Mark Terry, Consistency Coordinator Patricia A. Finnegan, Esq., Town Attorney Albert J.Krupski,President ��oF so�ryo Town Hall James King,Vice-President O l0 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster P.O. Box 1179 Ken Poliwoda Southold,New York 11971-0959 Peggy A. Dickerson Telephone(631)765-1892 COU , Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 28, 2005 Mr. Eric Bressler Wickham, Bressler, Gordon & Geasa, P.C. 13015 Main Street, P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck,NY 11952 Re: 10995 NORTH BAYVIEW ROAD, SOUTHOLD JOSEPH LOGIUDICE Dear Mr. Bressler: I am writing in response to your letter of June 16, 2005 regarding the above referenced Application. The application is before the Board of Trustees for review. The Board is currently waiting for the submission of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan Consistency Assessment Form from the applicant's agent, Dan Hall of Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. This office requested that the form be completed and submitted on May 31, 2005. When this office receives the Consistency Assessment Form it will be reviewed by the Town's LWRP coordinator, Mark Terry. The Board of Trustees will then review his determination,and pass a resolution on the application. In order to receive any more information on this file please send in to this office an authorization from the owner. Please contact this office with any further questions. Sincerely, �i 1, de�atherTeult Environmental Technician Cc: Joseph Logidice LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER, GORDON & GEASA, P.c. 13015 MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 MATTITLICK, LONG ISLAND ERIC J. BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 WILLIAM WICKHAM(o6-o2) ABIGAILA WICKHAM LYNNE M.GORDON MELVILLE OFFICE JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 275 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD TELEFAX NO. 631-298-8565 SUITE III wwblaw@aol.com MELVILLE, NEW YORK 11747 631-249-9480 TELEFAX NO.631-249-9484 D E C E � WE June 16,2005 JUN 17 2005 � Southold Town Town of Southold Board of Trustees Board of Town Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 RE: 10995 North Bayview Road Southold,New York Gentlemen: We are the attorneys for Joseph LoGiudice and are writing you with respect to his application for a wetlands permit. This application has been before you for a substantial period of time for determination. As you know, our client has been in possession of Department of Environmental Conservation permit since February, 2005. Demand is made that you issue a determination on the application so that our client may proceed with the project or otherwise take steps to protect his interest. Very truly yours, ERIC SSL R EJB/frd cc: Joseph LoGiudice Albert J.Krupski,President' �QF so James King,Vice-President' O� y�l j- Town Hall Q 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster P.O.Box 1179 Ken Poliwoda Southold,New York 11971-0959 Peggy A.Dickerson G 'p Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 31, 2005 Mr. Dan Hall Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. P.O. Box 1060 Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: PROPOSED DOCK JOSEPH LOGIUDICE 10995 NORTH BAYVIEW RD, SOUTHOLD SCTM#79-5-20.13 Dear Mr. Hall: On May 10, 2005 the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (2005) became effective as legislation. Please be advised that the above referenced action is now subject to Chapter 95, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code. Pursuant to Chapter 95, please complete the enclosed Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Consistency Assessment Form and submit it to this department. Please contact me at (631) 765-1892 if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Heather Tetrault Environmental Technician Enc. cc: Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney oSUFF �, Albert J.Krupski, President ®�. QG Town Hall James King,Vice-President �� 'yam 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster ti 4 P.O.Box 1179 Ken Poliwoda Z Southold,New York 11971-0959 Peggy A.Dickerson O'!'�® Telephone(631) 765-1892 1 `A Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES February 1, 2005 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD VIA fAx Zarife Koko Cronin Department of the Army New York District, Corps of Engineers Jacob K. Javits Federal Building New York,NY 10278 Attn: Eastern Permits Section Re: Application#2003-00052-1-L2, Joseph LoGiudice Dear Ms. Cronin: The Southold Board of Trustees has concerns regarding the above referenced application for a dock on Southold Bay. The following are problems with the location: 1. The fishing weir that has been historically located to the south of the proposed dock. There will be navigational problems with boats traveling the shoreline between the proposed dock and the fishing weir. 2. The shoreline there faces very rough winters with ice and high winds from the north and there is danger of a dock there breaking off pilings which will cause problems downwind. 3. There are erosion problems all along that shoreline wherever there are structures. The Town is following the Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan and the Nature Conservancy Study on Hardened Shorelines to protect stretches of undisturbed shoreline. 4. In following our Town Code the Trustees have concerns about the view sheds and vistas important to the community. 5. This is an unaltered shoreline with significant near shore shallow water habitat and a horseshoe crab nesting area. 6. It is very shallow in the area of-the dock. 7. The owner can use a mooring for boat access. Please contact our office if you have any questions. Sincerely, -Aka Heather Tetrault Environmental Technician OS�FFO�,� Albert J. Krupski,President ��. CQ y Town Hall James King,Vice-President �� G'y� 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster ti =6 P.O.Box 1179 Ken Poliwoda �y • Southold,New York 11971-0959 Peggy A. Dickerson �® Telephone(631) 765-1892 1 `t► Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 2, 2004 N.Y.S.DEC US Army Corp of Engineers N.Y.S. Dept. of State Re: Dock Application Joseph LoGiudice,North Bayview, Southold To All Concerned Agencies: The Southold Board of Town Trustees is in receipt of the above referenced application for a dock on Southold Bay, in Southold. We have begun the SEQRA process and requested a Full Environmental Form and would like to be Lead Agency and begin a coordinated review. Enclosed in the Full EAF. Please contact this office to discuss your concerns on this application. Sincer 1 , Heather Tetrault Environmental Technician os�FFot� Albert J. Krupski,President ��. CQG Town Hall James King,Vice-President �� 'yam 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster y -'� P.O.Box 1179 Ken Poliwoda �. • = Southold, New York 11971-0959 Peggy A. Dickerson Gy�Q aO� Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES December 2, 2004 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Charles Hamilton New York State Department of Environmental Conservation SUNY Building 40 Stony Brook,NY 11790 Re: Dock Application Joseph LoGiudice,North Bayview, Southold Dear Mr. Hamilton: The Southold Town Trustees are reviewing an application for the above referenced dock. The dock is located in an area that has been designated for no structures, due to historic fish traps, horseshoe crab nesting site, and aesthetic value. We have begun the SEQRA process and asked the consultant to provide us with the Long Environmental Assessment form. We have called Chris Arfsten in permits at NYSDEC to discuss this application and our concerns and he indicated,while DEC is still reviewing, that there are some other docks on that shoreline and a permit may be issued. We would like a coordinated review with our agencies on this project. Please contact our office. Thank you very much. Very Truly Yours, Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees �g�fFO�� Albert J. Krupski, President ��. CQ Town Hall James King,Vice-President h� G�� 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster =� P.O.Box 1179 Ken PoliwodaCa Southold, New York 11971-0959 Peggy A. Dickerson IS: Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 4, 2004 Mr. Dan Hall Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. P.O. Box 1060 Riverhead,NY 11901 Re: Joseph LoGiudice/Proposed Dock North Bayview Rd, Southold Dear Mr. Hall: The Board of Trustees is in receipt of the Environmental Assessment Form for the above referenced project. They have some questions about the accuracy of the responses and would like the following information and for the EAF to be amended to reflect these concerns: (1) Please provide this office with soundings in the area of the proposed dock (2) We would like to see a view shed analysis, showing photos of the area and the proposed dock superimposed on the area. Inaccuracies in the EAF: 1. The project description proposes a boatlift. The application before us was amended to remove the boatlift. Page 3. A. Site Description 2. # 1.Forest is checked. The proposed site of the dock is beach,bay front, and open water. 3. #10: No is checked. This is a Yes. There is a fish trap next to the proposed dock. 4. #11; Possible Least Tern and Piping Plover nesting area. 5. #12 This is a Yes. The unique land form here is a stretch of unimproved beach shoreline with no hardened structures. r-21 fl l( 6. #13 This is Yes. The area is used for Boating, Fishing and Walking. 7. #14 This is Yes. This is a scenic stretch of untouched beachfront. B. Project Description 8. #14 This is Yes. The existing water body surface area will.decrease:. 9. #19 and#20 Are you aware of the proposa ruse forthis_e6O ?.Please.= check with the owner ant include. `1 8 C. Zoning and Planning 10. #8. This is No. No docks in the area. Please send an amended EAF to reflect these corrections and the above 2 items. Thank you. Sincerely, ' Q Heather Tetrault Environmental Technician ' " I 1 "'t' .�( y x".Fw°.•,�4 r•-Yo—�_� )p,i d—tai `•' .��1''a'ii'�i�'^',�i'i ,,,�,�;��n�`m�morbld'aY�'4���d"�i''d',1;�'fVllq',�14PN�'iI,P,i'N�Fq�'!l'Bt�sF"9!""d���� ,"}�!�..•,`' ,'����r,,�;t ,i ,'•�� h 1 � u Y,i i il i ui � �uy 41 P��,di' � v,i �7�,1,�,:;+~r{�. „t - ~. OCT 1 9 204 Kim October 18, 2004 Southold Town Board of Trustees Town of Southold Board of Town Trustees _ P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Heather Tetrault Re: Joseph LoGiudice / Proposed Dock North Bayview Rd., Southold SCTM# 1000-79-5-20.13 J i— Dear Ms. Tetrault: As per your request enclosed please find(6) completed Long Environmental Assessment Forms in regards to the above referenced project. If there are any questions or if additional information is required please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Dan Hall Land Use Ecological Services, Inc DH Enc. PO Box 1060 • Village Dock, Riverhead, New York : 11901 631-727-2400 • FAX 631-727-2605 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently,there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: Part 1 ®Part 2 ®Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate),and any other supporting information,and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: RA. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ®B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ®C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions LoGiudice-Proposed Dock,Southold Name of Action 1pbarA 0-F fioiA)r-, �rc�S-}eeS Name of Lead Agency � ►uCS J JrC-e- der,� , �o��� �TnAjfeef Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer F d " Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signa re of Preparer If dlMrint fro responsible officer) 10-15-04 Date Page 1 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form,Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action LoGiudice-Proposed Dock,Southold Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) 10995 North Bayview Rd. Southold,N.Y. 11971 Name of Applicant/Sponsor Dan Hall/Land Use Ecological Services,Inc. Address P.O.Box 1060 City/PO Riverhead State NY Zip Code 11901 Business Telephone (631)727-2400 Name of Owner(if different) Joseph LoGiudice Address 4062-74 Grumman Blvd. City/PO Calverton State NY Zip Code 11933 Business Telephone (631)208-2933 Description of Action: Please See Attached Project Description. Page 2 L®gludlce - Southold Project Description: (7-1-04) Applicant proposes to construct a 4'x108' fixed timber catwalk with a boat lift. The catwalk is proposed to be elevated a minimum of 4' above the AHWM and will utilize (4) 4"x4" piles with a depth of penetration 6'+, and (26) 6" Dia. timber piles with a depth of-Penetration of 10'+. (4) 10" Dia. CCA timber tie-off piles are proposed. Please Complete Each Question--Indicate NA. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Useflrban Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban) ®Rural (non-farm) -F Forest ®Agriculture ®Other k i 2._, Total acreage of project area: 8.00 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0.00 acres 0.00 acres Forested 5.20 acres 5.20 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0.00 acres 0.00 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 0.40 acres 0.40 acres Water Surface Area 0.30 acres 0.30 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0.45 acres 0.45 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0.40 acres 0.40 acres Other (Indicate type) Lawn/Landscaping 1.25 acres 1.25 acres - Plymouth Loamy Sands - Carver & Plymouth Sands 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? - Riverhead Sandy Loam — Muck a. Soil drainage: ®✓ Well drained 87%of site ID Moderately well drained 5%of site. RPoorly drained 8 %of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? N/A acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ® Yes 17N No a. What is depth to bedrock N/A (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ®0-10% 98% ®10- 15% 1 % ® 15%or greater 1 % 6. Is project substantial) contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? F]Yes R No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Yes noo B. What is the depth of the water table? 0-12(in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ®Yes no No 10. Do hunting,,fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yes n No Page 3 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identifie�a ts�hreateneo or ndanger E]Yes i No According to. -- Several Site Visitations Identify each species n 12 Are there an unique or unusual land forms n the project site? (i.e , cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? .k Yes Describe- 13, Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? FYes No If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? WYes ENo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary N/A 16, Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Southold Bay,and un-named ponds b. Size (in acres): Ponds=0.30 Acre Southold Bay=500+Acres Page 4 i 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Fm]Yes F1No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? FYes No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Yes F*1No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ®Yes M No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL,' and 6 NYCRR 617? M Yes No H'k 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? MYes �No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project(fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 8.00 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 1.65 acres initially; 1.65 acres ultimately C. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 6.35 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. N/A f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 2-4 ; proposed N/A g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 2-4 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 1 N/A N/A N/A Ultimately 1 N/A N/A N/A i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 10'+/- height; 4 width; 108 length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? N/A ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.)will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards. 3 Will disturbed areas be reclaimed ®Yes 17,No no N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? N/A b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®Yes ®■ No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®Yes No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers)will be removed from site? 0 acres. Page 5 'r 5 Will any mature forest (over 100,___'3 old) or other locally-important vegetation be _..-Mored by this project? Yes No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: .45 months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a Total number of phases anticipated 1 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1. N/A month N/A year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase. N/A month N/A year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ® Yes No k 8. Will blasting occur during construction? F Yes 0 No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 3 ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ®Yes ®No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? 7 Yes FINo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc)and amount N/A b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged N/A 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ®Yes No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decreas\ y proposal? DYes`JrWlNo Ifex,esIain. Y P 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Yes MNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ®Yes M No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? N/A tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? M Yes -m- No c. If yes, give name N/A location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? RYes No Page 6 e. If yes, explain, N/A 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? FYes hml\lo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? N/A tons/month. i b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? N/A years. I i 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? FYes No I 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)?'FYesNO-\ 20 Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levelsT Yes N 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ®Yes Fill No If yes, indicate type(s) t N/A I i i I I I 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A I gallons/minute. I 23. Total anticipated water usage per day N/A gallons/day. I 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ®Yes No If yes, explain: i I I i I Page 7 i 25.Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date Southold Town Trustees 5-11-04 City, Town, Village Board M Yes No City, Town, Village Planning Board ®Yes FM] No City, Town Zoning Board M Yes ®- } No City, County Health Department ®Yes IE No Other Local Agencies M Yes F3 No New York State Department 5=12-04 Other Regional Agencies �Yes _ ® No of State NYSDEC 5-12-04 State Agencies IE Yes No USACOE 5-12-04 Federal Agencies ®� Yes ®No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ®Yes on, No If Yes, indicate decision required: ® Zoning amendment ® Zoning variance ® New/revision of master plan Subdivision ® Site plan ®Special use permit M Resource management plan M Other Page 8 2. •What is the zoning classifications) or the site? Residential R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? As developed 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? F1 Yes F1 No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/a mile radius of proposed action? R-40&A-C 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with_a A mile? F Yes No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? N/A Page 9 10. Will proposed action require any authorizations)for the formation of sewer or water districts? ®Yes 1E No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,fire protection? PlYes ® No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Yes No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Yes No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. 19Yes No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Dan Hall/Land Use Ecological Date 10-15-04 Signature Title Environmental Anslyst/Consultant If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information(Read Carefully) ! In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. ! The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But,for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds ma;" appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response,thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. `" ! The impacts of each project,on each site,in each locality,will vary. Therefore;the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. ! The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. ! In identifying impacts,consider long term,short term and cumulative effects. Instructions(Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example,check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large(column 2)does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moderate impact,also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO n YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15%or greater,(15 foot ® L.J Yes No rise per 100 foot of length),or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table 07 ® Yes No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more ® Yes ®No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or ® Yes ®No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or ® ® Yes'' ®No involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove ® Yes L=JNo more than 1,000 tons of natural material(i.e.,rock or soil)per year. Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. r7 ®Yes MNo • Construction in a designated floodway 0Yes rl No • Other impacts: El ®Yes No 2. Will there a an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? i.e.,cliffs,dunes,geological formations, etc.) O ®YES • Specific land forms: Yes No Impact on Water / 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? �\/ (Und icles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, E / b_*S s that would apply to column 2 • velopable area of site contains a protected water body. E3' 11 Yes No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of Yes No a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected waterYes No body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. dyes No • Other impacts: bes No 4. Will Proposed Action a ect any non-protected existing or new body of water? NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10%increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of El Yes M No water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface Yes El No area. • Other impacts: Li Ea/ Yes No Page 12 of 21 I 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affec surface o groundwater quality or quantity? ®NO ES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ® Yes No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not Yes 1:1No have approval to serve proposed(project)action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater ® ®Yes FINo than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ® Yes ED No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ® Yes EJJ No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which ® Yes nNo presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons ® Yes No per day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into ® Yes No an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or ® ®Yes No chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without ® Yes No water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses El Yes No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ® 11 ®Yes 11 No Page 13 of 21 i 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns,or surface water runoff? • �.a NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows ® ®Yes No • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. LJ ® ®Yes No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ® ®Yes ®No Proposed Action will allow development in a designated) E-1 ® 1:1Yes1:1 No floodway. T • Other impacts: ® ® ®Yes ®No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Prop sed Action affect air quality? , l O YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any ® ® ®Yes LrJ No given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton ® rl, ®Yes No of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs.per hour E-1 ® ®Yes -- No or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land ® El ®Yes LrJ No committed to industrial use. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of ® Yes No industrial development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ® Yes riNo IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? w> NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 1 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or ®Yes LJNo Federal list,using the site,over or near the site,or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 r� 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. El ® Yes No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more Than twice a year, � ® ®Yes MNo other than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: El Yes No 9. Will Proposed Action sub antially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species NO ES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident No or migratory fish,shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of 0____ ® ®Yes No mature forest(over 100 years of age)or other locally important vegetation. • Other impacts: ® El ®Yes 11 No ..............]I... IMP GST ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Prop ed Action affect agricultural land resources? O ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Proposed Action would sever,cross or limit access to 0 0 0 Yes 13 No agricultural land(includes cropland,hayfields,pasture,vineyard, orchard,etc.) • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ® ® ®Yes 0No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 ® Yes ONo acres of agricultural land or,if located in an Agricultural District, x„ more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 � Y � 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated'by Impact Impact Project Change • The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of ® []Yes ®No agricultural land management systems(e.g.,subsurface drain a lines,outlet ditches,strip cropping);or create a need for such measures(e.g.cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). • Other impacts: ® ® Yes 11 No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect-aesthetic resources?(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Adden dm in Section 617.20,Appendix B.) ®NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses,or project components obviously different Yes No from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns,whether man-made or natural. / • Proposed land uses,or project components visible to users of ® L Yes ®No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or ® Yes ®No significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ® ® ®Yes No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Propospd Action impact any site or structure of historic, preh'stor' or paleontological importance? O YES Examples that would apply to column 2 El • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or Yes No substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within Yes No the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive ® ® D Yes No for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Other impacts: El 0 DYes 0 No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affe t the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recrea 'onal opportunities? ® NO ES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. Yes No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Yes rl No • Other impacts: Yes No IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique character' tics of a critical environmental area(CEA)established pursua to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? NO Imi ®YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? ® ® Yes ®No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the ® ®Yes No resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the ® Yes 0No resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use,function or enjoyment of the ® Yes ri No resource? • Other impacts: ® ® ®Yes Eho Page 17 of 21 0 c ILAVI V r 1 I C J r —h�� 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change I /existing ORTATION 15. Will there be an efsportation systems?rl NO Examples that would apply to column 2 _ • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or FlYes No goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ®Yes No • Other impacts: ® ® D Yes El No IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed'Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy su Ip y? NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5%increase in the ® El 0 Yes El No use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ® ® MYes No energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • -Other impacts: ® Yes No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be ob'ectionable odors,noise,or vibration as a result of the Propos Action? NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital,school or other sensitive ED Yes No facility. • Odors will occur routinely(more than one hour per day). Yes No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the ®Yes U No local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a Yes No noise screen. • Other impacts: ®Yes El No Page 18 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. WillPro sed Action affect public health and safety? NO YES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of ® El ®Yes RNo hazardous substances(i.e.oil,pesticides,chemicals,radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions,or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes" ® ®Yes ®No in any form(i.e.toxic,poisonous, highly reactive,radioactive, irritating,infectious,etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied ® ®Yes nNo natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other ® ®Yes FINo disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ® ® ®Yes No E IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action a ect the character of the existing community? NO ES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city,town or village in which the n ®Yes ®No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. \ • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating ® ®Yes ®No services will increase by more than 5%per year as a result of this project. Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or ® Yes No goals. tt Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. El ®Yes ®No Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, ®Yes1:1 No structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community ® ®Yes ®No services(e.g.schools, police and fire,etc.) Page 19 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Moderate Large Mitigated y Impact Impact Project ange • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future es No projects. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. Yes No • Other impacts: ®I ® Yes No 20. Is there,or is there likely o be,public controversy related to potential adverse environment' pacts? ®NO YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 � f �- 697.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT�FOR OCT 19 2004 Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manta w they a project or action m y be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to ans Fr b of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine sigance mai 4 Ar formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. rin have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. w A Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: M Part 1 ®Part 2 ®Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate),and any other supporting information,and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is,reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ®A. The project will not result in any large and important impacts) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ®B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ®C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions LoGiudice-Proposed Dock,Southold Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer a Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signa ure of Preparer If cliftbrEint frorh responsible officer) 10-15-04 Date Page 1 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form,Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and maybe subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action LoGiudice-Proposed Dock,Southold Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) 10995 North Bayview Rd. Southold,N.Y. 11971 Name of Applicant/Sponsor Dan Hall/Land Use Ecological Services,Inc. Address P.O.Box 1060 City/PO Riverhead State NY Zip Code 11901 Business Telephone (631)727-2400 Name of Owner(if different) Joseph LoGiudice Address 4062-74 Grumman Blvd. City/PO Calverton State NY Zip Code 11933 Business Telephone ,(631)208-2933 Description of Action: Please See Attached Project Description. Page 2 Logi dice -- Southold Project Description: (7-1-04) Applicant proposes to construct a 4'x108' fixed timber catwalk with a boat lift. The catwalk is proposed to be elevated a minimum of T above the AHWM and will utilize (4) 4"x4" piles with a depth of penetration 6'+, and (26) 6",Dia. timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10'+. (4) 10" Dia. CCA timber tie-off piles are proposed. Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: ®Urban ®Industrial ®Commercial Residential (suburban) ©Rural (non-farm) Forest ®Agriculture ®Other 2.- Total acreage of project area: 8.00 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0.00 acres 0 00 acres Forested 5.20 acres 5.20 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0.00 acres 0.00 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 0.40 acres 0.40 acres Water Surface Area 0.30 acres 0.30 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0.45 acres 0.45 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0.40 acres 0.40 acres Other (Indicate type) Lawn/Landscaping 1.25 acres 1.25 acres - Plymouth Loamy Sands - Carver & Plymouth Sands 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? - Riverhead Sandy Loam — Muck a. Soil drainage: Fe]Well drained 87% of site Moderately well drained 5% of site. RPoorly drained 8 %of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of sod are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? N/A acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ® Yes M No a. What is depth to bedrock N/A (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ®0-10% 98% F110- 15% 1 % ® 15%or greater 1 % 6. Is project substantialiv contiguous to, or contain a budding, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes Fm! No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 0 Yes M N o 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0-12(in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? E]Yes M No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ®Yes Fm—]No Page 3 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? E]Yes F No According to. Several Site Visitations Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? rc'k ®Yes r0l No Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? FYes RNo If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? E]Yes MNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A 7 - - - - -- --- - - - - - - - i a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary N/A 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Southold Bay,and un-named ponds b. Size (in acres): Ponds=0.30 Acre Southold Bay=500+Acres Page 4 17., Is the site served by existing public utilities? Fm]Yes No a If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? FE]Yes [7]No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ®Yes ENo 18. Is the site located in[!Yes gricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? no No 19. Is the site located in or substantial) contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Yes No 'k 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ®Yes �No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project(fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor. 8.00 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 1.65 acres initially; 1.65 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 6.35 acres d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. N/A % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 2-4 ; proposed N/A g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 2-4 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 1 N/A N/A N/A Ultimately 1 N/A N/A N/A i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 10'+/- height; 4 width; 108 length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? N/A ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.)will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards. 3, Will disturbed areas be reclaimed ®Yes R No n N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? N/A b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®Yes 17W No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®Yes R No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers)will be removed from site? 0 acres. Page 5 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 __._ old) or other locally-important vegetation be n.;.. ,'.ted by this project? 0 Yes E No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: •45 months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 1 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1. N/A month N/A year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: N/A month N/A year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ® Yes M No k 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ®Yes M No 9. Number of jobs,generated: during construction 3 ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes FE]No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ®Yes I —A No a. If yes, indicate type of waste(sewage, industrial, etc)and amount N/A b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged N/A 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes On No Type i 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ®Yes No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? M Yes No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ®Yes O No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? N/A tons b. If yes, will,an existing solid waste facility be used? M Yes FE1 No c. If yes, give name N/A location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? MYes FlNo Page 6 e. If yes, explain: Y N/A 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ®Yes RM No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? N/A tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? N/A years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ®Yes R No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ®Yes No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ®Yes FiNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ®Yes R No If yes, indicate type(s) N/A 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day N/A gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? R Yes No If yes, explain: Page 7 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date Southold Town Trustees 5-11-04 City, Town, Village Board �Yes No City, Town, Village Planning Board D Yes No City, Town Zoning Board Yes No City, County Health Department Yes L--j No Other Local Agencies D Yes •1 No New York State Department 5-12-04 Other Regional Agencies �Yes No of State State Agencies IF]Yes El No NYSDEC 5-12-04 USACOE 5-12-04 Federal Agencies FE Yes ElNo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ®Yes No If Yes, indicate decision required: ® Zoning amendment Zoning variance ® New/revision of master plan ® Subdivision ® Site plan ®Special use permit Resource management plan Other Page 8 2. What is the zoning classification ksq-u i the site? Residential R-40 i 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? As developed 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ME, Yes ®No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/a mile radius of proposed action? R-40&A-C 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a 'A mile? M Yes ®No 9, If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? N/A Page 9 10. Will proposed action require any authonzation(s)for the.formation of sewer or water districts? 0 Yes F No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? 1 7M Yes FlNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? -®- Yes No 12, Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Yes No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. MYes E]No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Dan Hall/Land Use Ecological Date 10-15-04 Signature Title Environmental Anslyst/Consultant If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information(Read Carefully) In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question- Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But,for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response,thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. The impacts of each project,on each site,in each locality,will vary. Therefore,the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. ! In identifying impacts,consider long term,short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2 Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example,check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large(column 2)does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moderate impact,also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO ® YES VW Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15%or greater, (15 foot ® ® Yes No rise per 100 foot of length),or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10% • Construction on land where the depth to the water table ® ® Yes No is less than 3 feet • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more 11 Yes ®No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or U6 ® ® Yes R No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or ® Yes ®No involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove ® ® Yes ®No more than 1,000 tons of natural material(i.e., rock or soil)per year. Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. ® ® ®Yes r7No • Construction in a designated floodway. ® ®Yes ®No • Other impacts: ® El DYes ®No 2. Will there bean effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e,cliffs,dunes,geological formations,etc) ®NO ®YES • Specific land forms: ® 0 0Yes [D No Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ®N O ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. R Yes EINo • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of � 11 Yes 0 No a protected stream • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water �' ® ®Yes ®No body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ® Yes rill No • Other impacts: ® Lyes ®No 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ®NO JOYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10%increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of Yes ®No water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface ® I Yes No area. • Other impacts: ® EV Eyes ®No on OX-kr use I CA,,�a,.�� `.,A ��u,� s��c,t Page 12 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affec surfac or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Er F Yes 0No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not Ud F Yes n No have approval to serve proposed(project)action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater 10 ® Yes FINo than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water r-71' Yes1:1 No supply system. 1IV • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. LA F-1 Yes No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which ® ®Yes No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons �j ® 1:1Yes nNo per day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into ®Yes ®No an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or Yes RNo chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without ® 1:1Yes No water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses ® ® Yes 11 No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: E ® DYes 1:1 No CAc.} du'rTnj SAhA�kor Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns,or surface water runoff? 0 N ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows E ® ®Yes ONo • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. W ® ®Yes1:1 No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. r-3" ® ®Yes 11 No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated L21 11 Yes ®No floodway. • Other impacts: ® ®Yes1:1 No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Prop sed Action affect air quality? N O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any ® ® ®Yes ®No given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton ® ®Yes ®No of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs.per hour 1 ®Yes nNo or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land n ® ®Yes FINo committed to industrial use. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of ® M ®Yes ri No industrial development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: Ell, ® ®Yes No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? N O LES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or ® ®Yes E]No Federal list,using the site,over or near the site,or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. [;J ®Yes FINo • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, ® ®Yes No other than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: U El E]Yes ®No �c�Ss;L\e I�e��1. res �� c rc - - trvcr 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? ®NO ` YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident ® V1 ®Yes ®No or migratory fish,shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of ® ®Yes No mature forest(over 100 years of age)or other locally important vegetation. • Other impacts: ® ® ®Yes No an Uar,cru, Sp-eGce-_j IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? 01 NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Proposed Action would sever,cross or limit access to ® ® Yes No agricultural land(includes cropland,hayfields, pasture,vineyard, orchard,etc.) • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of n n Yes ®No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 El 11 Yes 13 No acres of agricultural land or,if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of ® ®Yes ®No agricultural land management systems(e.g.,subsurface drain lines,outlet ditches,strip cropping),or create a need for such measures(e.g cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). • Other impacts: ® ® ®Yes ®No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources?(If necessary,use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20,Appendix B.) 11NO ElYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses,or project components obviously different ay-es m No from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns,whether man-made or natural. / • Proposed land uses,or project components visible to users of ® Uff Yes ®No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or ® �3 &es ®No significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ® ® ®Yes 11 No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? N O ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or ® ® ®Yes ® No substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within Yes ®No the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive ® ®Yes ri No for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Other impacts: ® ® ®Yes El No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? El NO CKYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ® Yes No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Yes ®No • Other impacts: ® ® E]Yes ®No IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area(CEA)established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? D40 ®YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? ® ® r1yes ®No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the ® ®Yes ®No resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the F Yes ®No resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use,function or enjoyment of the ®Yes ®No resource? • Other impacts: Q ®Yes ®No Page 17 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? rl NO b�zS Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or Yes []No goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ® M!Yes ®No • Other impacts: ® ]Yes ®No IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? 'NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5%increase in the ® ® 17Yes ®No use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ® ® ®Yes ®No energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ® ® ElYes ®No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise,or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? E2<0 ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital,school or other sensitive ® ®Yes ®No facility. • Odors will occur routinely(more than one hour per day). ® ® ®Yes ®No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the ® ® ®Yes ®No local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ® ® EJYes ®No noise screen. • Other impacts: ® ® ®Yes ®No Page 18 of 21 1 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? NO ®YES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of ® ® ®Yes ®No hazardous substances(i e,oil, pesticides,chemicals,radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions,or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes" El ® ®Yes ®No in any form(i.e.toxic, poisonous,highly reactive,radioactive, irritating,infectious,etc) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied ® ®Yes r7No natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other ® El ®Yes ®No disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ® 17, ®Yes ®No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Actiop affect the character of the existing community? ®NO FANYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city,town or village in which the ® ® ®Yes ®No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating ® F1 ®Yes ®No services will increase by more than 5%per year as a result of this project. • Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or ® p Eyes ®No goals. • Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. ® El ®Yes ®No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, ® ®Yes ®No structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community ® ® ®Yes ®No services(e.g.schools, police and fire,etc.) Page 19 of 21 f 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future ® ru/ Yes ®No projects. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ® El ®Yes No • Other impacts: El ® Yes No 20. Is there,or is there likely to be,public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? NO ES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s)is considered to be potentially large,even if the impact(s)may be mitigated. Instructions(If you need more space,attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. , 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available,decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance,consider: ! The probability of the impact occurring I The duration of the impact ! Its irreversibility,including permanently lost resources of value I Whether the impact can or will be controlled ! The regional consequence of the impact ! Its potential divergence from local needs and goals ! Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 21 of 21 I j 14-12-8(3/99)-9c SEQR State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Determination of Significance Project Number Date: 1000-53-01-09 Date: May 13, 2002 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The Town of Southold Planning Board as lead agency,has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant impact on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Name of Action: Minor Subdivision of John&Rose Milazzo SEQR Status: Type 1 Unlisted X Scoping: No_ Yes X If yes, indicate how scoping will be conducted: Public scoping sessions will be conducted at the Town of Southold Town Hall located at P.O. Box 1179, 53095 State Road 25, Southold,New York Description of Action: The proposed action is to subdivide a 12.54 acre parcel into 3 single family residential lots. The site consists of woodlands and extensive freshwater and marine wetlands. Location: The site is located on the Pipes Neck peninsula in Greenport. The parcel is located on the north side of Pipes Neck Road,the southern and eastern property boundary abuts Pipes Creek. A location map is enclosed. _ 617.20 - Appendix A State Er1ilronmental Quality Review' _ FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT-FORM Purpose; The full,EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether,a project or action'may be signifcar>t. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always'easy to,answer. Frequently,there ate aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part,2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: Part 1 E Part 2 ,Part 3 L Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate),and any other supporting information,and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ®A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ®B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* FIC. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions LoGiudice-Proposed Dock,Southold Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer 1 , Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signa ure of Preparer If f rent fro responsible officer) l� - 04 Date Page 1 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on,the environment Please complete the entirb'form,Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered.,as part of the application for approval and may,be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional informtion you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2'and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action LoGiudice-Proposed Dock,Southold Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) 10995 North Bayview Rd. Southold,N.Y. 11971 Name of Applicant/Sponsor Dan Hall/Land Use Ecological Services,Inc. Address P.O Box 1060 City/PO Riverhead State NY Zip Code 11901 Business Telephone (631)727-2400 Name of Owner(if different) Joseph LoGiudice Address 4062-74 Gnunman Blvd City/PO Calverton State NY Zip Code 11933 Business Telephone (631)208-2933 Description of Action: Please See Attached Project Description Page 2 Log udice - Southold Project Description: Applicant proposes to construct a recreational dock facility consisting of a Tx 108' fixed timber catw4vyItlt (4)tie-off piles. The catwalk is proposed to be elevated a minimum of 4' above the AHWM and will utilize (4) 4"x4" piles with a depth of penetration 6'+, and (26) 6" Dia. timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10'+. (4) 10" Dia. CCA timber tie-off piles are proposed. Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use. ®Urban Industrial El Commercial M. Residential (suburban) Rural (non-farm) ® Forest ®Agriculture F Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 8.00 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0.00 acres 0.00 acres Forested 5.20 acres 5.20 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0.00 acres 0.00 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 0.40 acres 0.40 acres Water Surface Area 0.30 acres 0.30 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0.45 acres 0.45 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0.40 acres 0.40 acres Other (Indicate type) Lawn/Landscaping 1.25 acres 1.25 acres - Plymouth Loamy Sands - Carver & Plymouth Sands 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? - Riverhead Sandy Loam — Muck a. Soil drainage: F✓ Well drained 87% of site Moderately well drained 5%of site. F--']Poorly drained 8 %of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within sod group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? N/A acres (see 1 NYCRR 370) 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? 0 Yes Ff No a What is depth to bedrock N/A (in feet) 5 Approximate percentage of proposed project site-with slopes IVJ0-10% 98% M10- 15% 1 % F1 15%or greater 1 % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, o contain a budding, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? LJ Yes No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Yes MNo 8. What is the depth of the water table?_ 0-12 (in feet) 9 Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes If No 10 Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yes No Page 3 11. Does project site contain any species or plant or animal life that is identified as threate—-r endangered? ©Yes M No According to: - Several Site Visitations. Identiffy,each species. 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? ©Yes FE]No Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? 1E Yes ®No If yes, explain: The project site and adjacent areas are utilized for boating,fishing,and associated recreational activities. 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? EYes ElNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary N/A 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Southold Bay,and un-named freshwater ponds/wetlands areas. b. Size (in acres). Ponds=0.30 Southold Bay=500+Acres Page 4 17 Is the site served by existing public utilities? no Yes F'No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? RYes ®No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Yes r '18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ®Yes M No 19 Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? M Yes In INo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? F17Yes ®i No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project(fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor. 8.00 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 1.65 acres initially; 1.65 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 6.35 acres. d. Length of project, in miles. N/A (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. N/A % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 2-4 ; proposed N/A g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 24 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential- Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 1 N/A N/A N/A Ultimately 1 N/A N/A N/A i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure. 10'+/- height, 4 width, 108 length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? N/A ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.)will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed F]Yes Do rm�N/A a If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? N/A b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Yes ■N No c Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes no No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers)will be removed from site? 0 acres. Page 5 5. Will any mature forest(over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? 0 Yes ; ', No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: .45 months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 1 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 N/A month N/A year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: N/A month N/A year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? M Yes M No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? r Yes OF No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 3 ; after project is complete 10 Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?®Yes M• No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? D Yes • No a If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount N/A b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged N/A 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? M Yes F1 No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Yes No If yes, explain: The dock is proposed to be an open piled dock elevated a minimum of 4' above the AHWM and thus will not have an effect on the surface area of Southold Bay. 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? FE]Yes FINo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes • No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? N/A tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes M No c. If yes, give name N/A location N/A d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? E]Yes E No Page 6 e. If,yes, explain: N/A' v 17. Will the project involve the'disposal of solid waste? F]Yes FE No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? N/A tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? N/A years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ®Yes R No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ®Yes No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ®Yes No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ®Yes F No If yes, indicate type(s) N/A 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day N/A gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? F]Yes F No' If yes, explain. Page 7 25. Approvals Required: Type -, , Submittal Date Southold Town Trustees 5-11-04 City, Town, VillagO,Board Fm-]Yes ❑�No City, Town, Village Planning Board ❑Yes No City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes M No City, County Health Department ®Yes No Other Local Agencies ❑Yes M No New York State Department 5-12-04 Other Regional Agencies M Yes ❑ No of State NYSDEC 5-12-04 State Agencies 0 Yes ® No USACOE 5-12-04 Federal Agencies M Yes r-1No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ❑Yes ❑■ No If Yes, indicate decision required: 0 Zoning amendment © Zoning variance ❑ New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision ❑ Site plan ❑ Special use permit ❑Resource management plan ❑ Other Page 8 2. What is the zoning classifications) of the site? Residential R-40 3. What is.the maximum potential developrtterit of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? As developed 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? F Yes ®No 7 What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? R-40&A-C 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a '/4 mile? Yes No 9, If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? N/A Page 9 10. Will proposed actlon"require any authorization(s)for the formation of sewer or water districts.'•-`T=Yes N No 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? Yes ® No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Yes ®No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? E]Yes No a. If yes, is the existing-road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. no No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Dan Hall/Land Use Ecological Date Signature Title Environmental Anslyst/Consultant If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 6 a 7.20 'Appendix A I� ' _tate-Environmental��Qualit Y—OView; l� �" �* Y,. FULL'ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT',FO i JAN -.1 Purpose, The full EAF is designed,to help applicants and agencies idetermine, in,an orderly m e , ether a project or action may fie'significant, The question of wW&r ati action may be significant is_'66t alvu'ays easy to an wer. Frequently,there are as a is of a,project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine s nificance mayOWMWIi ldior no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. Ir addition, mflnyrdMid'laV@skno in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of signs icance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: ' Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,it assists' a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate-or whether it-is a potentially-large impact: The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type-1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF,completed for this project: Part 1 0 Part 2 - 00art'3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and,2 and 3 if appropriate),and any other supporting information,and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ®A. The project will not result'm any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ®13: Although the project could,have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3,have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* MC. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the ' environment, therefore a,positive declaration will be prepared *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions LoGiudice-Proposed Dock,Southold Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signa ure of Preparer If dIfftEint frorh responsible officer) Date Page 1 PART'1--PROJECT INFORMATION- y ' -Prepared by Project Sponsor: NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the,, environrnb . Please complete the entire•fo'r'mr Parts A through E. Answers to.these,questions will be considered as=part... the' t application'for approval and may be subject to further verification and public•review.-,Provide any additional information you believe will tie ridded to complete Parts 2 and 3: " It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action LoGiudice-Proposed Dock,Southold Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) 10995 North Bayview Rd. Southold,N.Y. 11971 Name of Applicant/Sponsor Dan Hall/Land Use Ecological Services,Inc. Address P.O.Box 1060 City/'PO kiverhead State NY Zip Code 11901 Business Telephone (631)727-2400 Name of Owner(if different) Joseph LoGiudice Address 4062-74 Grumman Blvd. City/PO Calverton State NY Zip Code 11933, Business Telephone (631)208-2933 Description of Action: Please See Attached Project Description Page 2 1 Log udioe - 'Southo�d- Project Description: Applicant proposes to construct a recreational dock facility consisting of a 4'x108'fixed timber catwalk vy+th(4)tie-off piles. The catwalk is proposed to be elevated a minimum of 4' above the AHWM and will utilize (4)4"x4" piles with a depth of penetration"6'+, and (26) 6" Dia. timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10'+. (4) 10" Dia. CCA timber tie-off piles are proposed. ; 1 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use. ®Urban "Ind6stnal ElCommercial Residential (suburban) 12ural"(non farm) ® ElForest ®Agriculture 1-1 Other 2. Total acreage of project area. 8.00 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0.00 acres 0.00 acres Forested 5.20 acres 5.20 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0.00 acres 0.00 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 0.40 acres 0.40 acres Water Surface Area 0.30 acres 030 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0.45 acres 0.45 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0.40 acres 0.40 acres Other (Indicate type) Lawn/Landscaping 125 acres 1.25 acres - Plymouth Loamy Sands - Carver & Plymouth Sands 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? - Riverhead Sandy Loam — Muck a. Sod drainage: ®✓ Well drained 87% of site F Moderately well drained 5%of site. Poorly drained 8 %of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? N/A acres (see 1 NYCRR 370) 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? E] Yes 9 No a. What is depth to bedrock N/A (in feet) 5 Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes 1\/10-10% 98% M10- 15% 1 % F6 15%or greater 1 % 6 Is project substantial) contiguous to, o contain a budding, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? F]Yes No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 0 Yes [FfNo B. What is the depth of the water table? 0-12(in feet) 9 Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? FlYes lyf No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Fv�Yes 0 No Page 3 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threat': or endangered? ®Yes No Accordin to: Several Site Visitations. Identify-each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? 'Yes No Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Yes ©No If ye"s, explain: The project site and adjacent areas are utilized for boating,fishing,and associated recreational activities 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? EYes ONo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary N/A 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Southold Bay,and un-named freshwater ponds/wetlands areas b Size (in acres) Ponds=0.30 Southold Bay=500+Acres Page 4 1. . • 17.-Is the site served,by existing public utilities I Yes ©"No a. ,.IPYES,'does sufficient capacity exist-46 allow connection?' Yes` El"No , .b. '.1f-YES, will improvements be'necessary to allow connection?' Yes �No 18: is the site located in an agricultural'district certified pursuant to Agriculture acid\Markets Law, Article 25-AA,-Section 3b3 and 304? ©Yes No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the'ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? F�Yes No 20'. Has the site ever been used'for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes RYes ®i No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions"and scale of project(fill in dimensions•as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 8.00 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 1.65 acres initially; 1.65 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 6.35 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent,of expansion proposed. N/A f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 2-4 ; proposed N/A g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 2-4 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential. Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 1" N/A N/A N/A Ultimately 1 N/A N/A N/A i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure. 10'+/- height, 4 width; 108 length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? N/A ft 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.)will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed Yes F1No 101N/A Fl a. If yes,,for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? N/A b., Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ©Yes ■0 No C Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation?` Yes No -4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. Page 5 5. Will any mature'forest (over 100 years old)-or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ®Yes ®■ No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: .45 months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-pliii,5ed: „ a. Total number of phases anticipated 1 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 N/A month N/A year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: N/A month N/A year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? M Yes No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? 0 YesE No 9 Number of jobs generated. during construction 3 ; after project is complete 10 Number of jobs,eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ©Yes ENo If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ©Yes 1■ No a If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc)and amount N/A b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged N/A 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ©Yes M No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ®Yes FM]No If yes, explain The dock is proposed to be an open piled dock elevated a minimum of 4' above the AHWM and thus will not have an effect on the surface area of Southold Bay. 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? 0 Yes E]No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? 0 Yes No a If yes, what is the amount per month? N/A tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? E]Yes lil No c. If yes, give name N/A location N/A d Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? QYes F No Page 6 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? F]Yes RE No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? N/A tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? N/A years; 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? MYes R No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ®Yes R No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? MYds P�No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ®Yes No If yes, indicate type(s) N/A 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23 Total anticipated water usage per day N/A gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? F-]Yes M No' If yes, explain. Page 7 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date _ Southold Town Trustees 5-11-04 City, Tow Cl,.Village Board Yes, No City, Town, Village Planning Board ©Yes FM] No City, Town Zoning Board M Yes M No City, County Health Department ®Yes � No Other Local Agencies ©Yes M No New York State Department 5-12-04 Other Regional Agencies T Yes © No of State NYSDEC 5-12-04 State Agencies T Yes ® No USACOE 5-12-04 Federal Agencies F—m]Yes ©No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? F]Yes Fm] No If Yes, indicate decision required. E] Zoning amendment © Zoning variance E] New/revision of master plan Subdivision 0 Site plan Special use permit Resource management plan Other Page 8 2. ' Whans the zoriing`,classification(s) of the,site?"' Residend'if R r' , 10. Will proposed action-require any authorization(s) fcr.�the.formation of sewer or water Yes ®■ No - 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? Yes ® No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Yes No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? E]Yes F No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. FlYes No 17 D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Dan Hall/Land Use Ecological Date Signature Title Environmental Anslyst/Consultant If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. i Page 10 697.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently,there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action: Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large,then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is _ actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: M Part 1 ®Part 2 ®Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate),and any other supporting information,and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ®A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. RB. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* MC. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment,therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions LoGiudice-Proposed Dock,Southold Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signa re of Preparer Ilf diffbirdnt frorh responsible officer) 10-15-04 Date Page 1 -• 6/7.2D Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a projector action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently,there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert to environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is _ actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: M Part 1 ®Part 2 ®Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate),and any other supporting information,and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ®A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ®C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions LoGiudice-Proposed Dock,Southold Name of Action Name of Lead Agency _ Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer a Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signa re of Preparer If diffbirdirit frorh responsible officer) 10-15-04 Date Page 1 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently,there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no'formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: 'Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is _ actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: M Part 1 1:1 Part 2 F]Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate),and any other supporting information,and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ®A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. _ ®B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3`have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* MC. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions LoGiudice-Proposed Dock,Southold Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer I& Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signa ure of Pre Mer If ent froM responsible officer) 10-15-04 Date Page 1 --TART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form,Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action LoGiudice-Proposed Dock,Southold Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) 10995 North Bayview Rd. Southold,N.Y. 11971 Name of Applicant/Sponsor Dan Hall/Land Use Ecological Services,Inc. Address P.O.Box 1060 City/PO Riverhead State NY Zip Code 11901 Business Telephone (631)727-2400 Name of Owner(if different) Joseph LoGiudice Address 4062-74 Grumman Blvd. City/PO Calverton State NY Zip Code 11933 Business Telephone (631)208-2933 Description of Action: Please See Attached Project Description. Page 2 L® ludlce -- Southold Project Description: (7-1-04) Applicant proposes to construct a 4'x 108' fixed timber catwalk with boat li he catwalk is proposed to be elevated a minimum of 4'above the AHWM and will utilize (4)411 x4" piles with a depth of penetration 6'+, and (26) 6" Dia. timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10'+. (4) 10" Dia. CCA timber tie-off piles are proposed. Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1, Present Land Use:R Urban ®Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban) ®Rural (non-farm) Forest s Agriculturether 1010 2._ Total acreage of project area: 8.00 acres. �U APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0.00 acres 0.00 acres Forested 5.20 acres 5.20 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0.00 acres 0.00 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 0.40 acres 0.40 acres Water Surface Area 0.30 acres 0.30 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0.45 acres 0.45 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0.40 acres 0.40 acres Other(indicate type) Lawn/Landscaping 1.25 acres 1.25 acres - Plymouth Loamy Sands - Carver & Plymouth Sands 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? - Riverhead Sandy Loam — Muck a. Soil drainage: Well drained 87%of site FiModerately well drained 5%of site. FlPoorly drained 8 %of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of sod are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? N/A acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ® Yes 170- No a. What is depth to bedrock N/A (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: M0-10% 98% 010- 15% 1 % ® 15%or greater 1 % 6. Is project substantialiv contiguous to, or contain a budding, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes FE I No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? FlYes F1No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0-12(in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ®Yes F No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ®Yes F No Page 3 I 11. Does project site contain any species or plant or animal life that is identified as threate.— -r endangered? ©Yes ENo According to. Several Site Visitations Identify each species. 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e , cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? ©Yes rol No k Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ®Yes No If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? E]Yes ■®No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area. F A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary N/A 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Southold Bay,and un-named ponds b. Size (in acres): Ponds=0.30 Acre Southold Bay=500+Acres Page 4 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? PE Yes F]- No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? R Yes No b If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Yes �No 18. Is the site located inan agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ®Yes �No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Yes No �x 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Yes FulNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project(fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 8.00 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 1.65 acres initially, 1.65 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 6.35 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. N/A % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 2-4 , proposed N/A g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 24 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units. One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 1 N/A N/A N/A Ultimately 1 N/A N/A N/A i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure. 10'+/- height; 4 width, 108 length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? N/A ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.)will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed ®Yes E]No R N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? N/A b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®Yes ®■ No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®Yes No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers)will be removed from site? 0 acres. Page 5 5. Will any mature forest(over 100 old) or other locally-important vegetation be re �d by this project? F7 Yes Ei] No 6 If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: .45 months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a Total number of phases anticipated 1 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: N/A month N/A year, (including demolition) c Approximate completion date of final phase- N/A month N/A year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ® Yes F1 No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ®Yes M No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 3 ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?®Yes M No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ®Yes M No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc)and amount N/A b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged N/A 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? F-1 Yes M No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ®Yes M No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? M Yes FINo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ®Yes M No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? N/A tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ®Yes E No c. If yes, give name N/A ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ®Yes FE l No Page 6 e. If yes,-explain. N/A 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ®Yes FE No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate,of disposal? N/A tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? N/A years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ®Yes `' No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? F Yes R No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ®Yes No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? F Yes El No If yes, indicate type(s) N/A 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day N/A gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? F]Yes ®M No If yes, explain: Page 7 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date Southold Town Trustees 5-11-04 City, Town, Village Board Yes 7 No City, Town, Village Planning Board FlYes M No City, Town Zoning Board 0 Yes No City, County Health Department ®Yes M No Other Local Agencies ®Yes M No New York State Department 5-12-04 Other Regional Agencies M Yes ® No of State NYSDEC 5-12-04 State Agencies M Yes No _ USACOE 5-12-04 Federal Agencies M Yes ®No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ®Yes ■® No If Yes, indicate decision required: ® Zoning amendment ® Zoning variance ® New/revision of master plan M Subdivision ® Site plan M Special use permit M Resource management plan M Other Page 8 2. What is the zoning classification(sj of Lhe site? Residential R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? As developed 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Yes "No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/a mile radius of proposed action? R-40&A-C l g. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a A mile? ®i Yes ®No, 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? N/A Page 9 10. Will proposed action require any authorizations) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ® Yes MW No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,fire protection? M Yes ri No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Yes No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? E]Yes M No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. Yes ®No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Dan Hall/Land Use Ecological Date 10-15-04 Signature Title Environmental Anslyst/Consultant If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency,complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 �SUFFo1�-�, Albert J. Krupski, President ��. Q� Town Hall James King,Vice-President �� '�� 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster o 1 P.O.Box 1179 Ken Poliwoda * Southold,New York 11971-0959 Peggy A. Dickerson Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 �G� S Z o 0 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Dan Hall Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. P.O. Box 1060 Riverhead,NY 11901 Re: Joseph LoGiudice/Proposed dock North Bayview Rd, Southold SCTM#79-5-20.13 Dear Mr. Hall: The Board of Town Trustees has reviewed the above referenced application. After a series of investigations into the proposal they have determined that they need more information. They are requesting a completed Long Environmental Assessment Form, as part of the SEQRA process, in order to obtain more information on the site. Please send a completed form into this office at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Heather Tetrault Environmental Technician i f LanJ M,i+Ny'a112e8i7V',`�^ September 28 2004 Town of Southold Board of Trustees 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 j9 E C E W E Southold,NY 11971 lu Atte: Heather Tetrault SEP Z 0 2004 Re: Joseph LoGiuduce,North Bayview Road, Southold Southold Town' SCTM# 1000-79-5-20.13 Board of Trustees Proposed Dock Dear Ms. Tetrault: As per your request enclosed please find(3)project descriptions in regards to the above referenced project. If there are any questions or if additional information is required please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Dan Hall Land Use Ecological Services,Inc. DH Enc. PO Box 1060 • Village Dock, Riverhead, New York • 11901 631-727-2400 • FAX 631-727-2605 Logiudice - Southold Project Description: Applicant proposes to construct a 4'x 108'fixed timber catwalk with(4)tie-off piles. The catwalk is proposed to be elevated a minimum of T above the AHWM and will utilize (4)4"x4" piles with a depth of penetration 6'+, and(26)6"Dia. timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10'+. (4) 10" Dia. CCA timber tie-off piles are proposed. ® EC � o � SEP 2 9 2004 Southold Town Board of Trustees 08/18/0¢ WED 10:00 FAX 631 7272605 LAND USE ECOLOGICAL 0002/002 Landuse MEM DATE: August 18, 2004 TO: Southold Town Trustees A,TTN: Lauren FROM: Dan Hall Re: Joseph Logiudice,North Bayview Rd., Southold SCTM# 1000-79-5-20.13 Proposed Dock Please utilize this correspondence as a request to postpone the above referenced matter scheduled for the trustee meeting this evening until next months(September's)meeting. Our office is in the process of obtaining and putting together the information for a report on the existing bottom(benthic) conditions at the project site. If there are any questions please do not hesitate to contact this office. Thank You. DH FAX P.O. Box 1060 - Villoge Dock, Riverhead, New York - 11901 631-727-2400 - FAX 631-727-2605 -/,18/04 WED 09:59 FAX 631 7272605 LAND USE ECOLOGICAL 1@001/002 a Use Fax TRANSMISSION SHEET DATE: August 17,2004 TO: Town of Southold Trustees ATTN: Lauren FROM: Dan Hall RL: Joseph Logiudice,North Bayview Rd.,Southold SC:TM# I000-79-5-20.13 Proposed Dock FAX#: (631)765-1823 #OF PAGES: (2) (including FAX transmission sheet) REMARKS: If there are any questions please don't hesitate to contact our office. DE � E AUG seothold Tovm Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1060, Village Dock, Riverhead, NY 11901 Phone: (631)-727-2400 • Fax: (631)-727-2605 w anL 'd se i July 1,2004 D U -IRI Town of Southold JUL - Z LA Board of Trustees 53095 Main Road Southold Town P.O. Box 1179 Board of Trustees Southold,NY 11971 Attn: Lauren Re: Joseph LoGiuduce,North Bayview Road, Southold SCTM# 1000-79-5-20.13 Proposed Dock Dear Lauren: Enclosed please find(6)revised plans and project descriptions in regards to the above referenced project. Please utilize these revised plans in conjunction with the trustee meeting scheduled for July 21, 2004. These plans have been revised to eliminate the boat lift and now proposes (4)tie off piles. If there are any questions or if additional information is required please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, 711Hall Use Ecological ervices, Inc. DH Enc. PO Box 1060 • Village Dock, Riverhead, New York • 1 1901 631-727-2400 • FAX 631-727-2605 t L® iudicc - Southold Project Description: (7-1-04) Applicant proposes to construct a 4'x108' fixed timber catwalk with a boat lift. The catwalk is proposed to be elevated a minimum of 4' above the AHWM and will utilize (4)41T x4" piles with a depth of penetration 6'+, and (26) 6" Dia. timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10'+. (4) 10" Dia. CCA timber tie-off piles are proposed. Logi dice - Southold Project Description: (7-1-04) Applicant proposes to construct a 4'x108' fixed timber catwalk with a boat lift. The catwalk is proposed to be elevated a minimum of 4' above the AHWM and will utilize (4)4"x4" piles with a depth of penetration 6'+, and (26) 6" Dia. timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10'+. (4) 10" Dia. CCA timber tie-off piles are proposed. C U J U L - 2 2004 L__77GUFh_OId Town B02iC� Jf Tmshes STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE 41 STATE STREET ALBANY, NY 1 223 1-0001 GEORGE E. PATAKI June 18,2004 RANDY A. DANIELS GOVERNOR SECRETARY OF STATE Mr.Dan Hall Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. 2576 Sound Avenue Baiting Hollow,NY 11933 Re: F-2003-0039 -(Modification) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/New York District Permit Application-John Hurtado, Sr-Construct 4'x 108'fixed catwalk; proposed to utilize(4)4"x 4"timber dock piles and(26)6"dia CCA timber dock piles Southold-Bay,Town of Southold. Suffolk County General Concurrence-Modification To Previously Reviewed Activi Dear Mr. Hall: The Department of State received your proposed modification of the above-referenced activity on May 17,2004. The Department previously reviewed the original proposal and concurred with a consistency certification for it;-or otherwise indicated it had no objection to authorization of the proposed activity. The proposed modification involves a 4'x 108'fixed timber catwalk with a boat lift. The Department of State has determined that this modification of the activity previously reviewed by this Department would not result in coastal zone effects that would be substantially different than those originally reviewed by the Department,and that the modified proposal meets the Department's general consistency- concurrence criteria. Therefore,further Department of State review of this modification to the previously reviewed activity; ?-nd the Den run=t? .,c Tic- t , .a r2...,.,... 3 :?�vL.Ii:.:vv'v':Lu.iia lilui iuiiai LviisiSiGLcy GCIdfivaiiun, are nol required. When communicating with us regarding this matter,please contact'Vance A. Barr at(518)402-3399 and refer to our file#F-2003-0039. Sincerely, William Feldhusen Coastal Resource Specialist 2 Consistency Review and Analysis c: COE/New York District-Michael Vissichelli' NYSDEC/Region 1-John Pavacic WWW.DOS.STATE.NY.US E-MAIL: INFO@005.STATE.NY.US RECYCLED PAPER L c L �I x f i' STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE 41 STATE STREET ALBANY, NY 1 223 1-000 I GEORGE E. PATAKI June 18,2004 BANDY A. DANIELS GOVERNOR SECRETARY OF STATE Mr. Dan Hall Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. 2576 Sound Avenue Baiting Hollow,NY 11933 Re: F-2003-0039 (Modification) U.S.Army Corps of Engineers/New York District Permit Application-John Hurtado, Sr-Construct 4'x 108'fixed catwalk; proposed to utilize(4)4"x 4"timber dock piles and(26) 6"dia CCA timber dock piles Southold Bay, Town of Southold. Suffolk County General Concurrence-Modification To Previously Reviewed Activi Dear Mr. Hall: The Department of State received your proposed modification'of the above-referenced activity on May 17,2004. The Department previously reviewed the original proposal and concurred with a consistency certification for It, or otherwise indicated it had no objection to authorization of the proposed activity. The proposed modification involves a 4'x 108'fixed timber catwalk with a boat lift. The Department of State has determined that this modification of the activity previously reviewed by this Department would not result in coastal zone effects that would be substantially different than those originally reviewed by the Department, and that the modified proposal meets the Department's general consistency concurrence criteria. Therefore,further Department of State review of this modification to the previously reviewed artii ty ?r- the D--artI'I e t'S concurrence- aL 1' •-a - �' r J.iu.iii iituliatvi7i1n1.;lG1Zty C.eI"Lllll%tli1fS1I, are not required. When communicating with us regarding this matter,please contact Vance A.Barr at(518)402-3399 and refer to' our file#F-2003-0039. Sincerely, l William Feldhusen Coastal Resource Specialist 2 Consistency Review and Analysis c: COE/New York District-Michael Vissichelli NYSDEC/Region 1-John Pavacic WWW.DO5.5TATE NY.US ' E-MAIL: INFO@DO5 STATE.NY.US RECYCLED P.V EP Lan Use June 15,2004 Town of Southold Board of Trustees 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 ® E � � Q Attn: Lauren JUN 16 2004 Re: Recreational Dock Application Joseph LoGiuduce,North Bayview Road, Southold Southold Town Board of Trustees Dear Lauren: Enclosed please find the additional $50.00 fee due in regards to the above application. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if there are any questions or if additional information is required. Sincerely, Dan Hall Land Use Ecological Services,Inc. DH Enc. P.O. Box 1060 • Village Dock, Riverhead, New York • 11901 631-727-2400 • FAX 631-727-2605 Albert J Krupski, President O��SUFFO(�-C� Town Hall 53095 Route 25 James King, Vice-President P O. Box 1179 Henry Smith c Southold, New York 11971-0959 Artie Foster N � Ken Poliwoda Oy �� Telephone (631) 765-1892 if+ol � �aQ Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only CwIL4 not to En _Coastal Erosion Permit Application plow etland Permit Application Major Minor _Waiver/Amendment/Changes /"Received Application: Received Fee:$ !!! lTompleted Application _Incomplete _SEQRA Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted MAY 1 4 2004 C Coordination:(date sent) ECAC Referral Sent t`� Southold Town ate of Inspection: ® , Board of Trustees _Receipt of CAC Report. _Lead Agency Determination: r _Technical Review: ,public Hearing Held: Resolution- Name of Applicant Joseph K. LoGiudice AddreA062 Grumman Blvd. Bldg 74 Calverton, NY 11933-1502 Phone Number:( ) (631 ) 208-2933 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000- 79-5-20.13 Property Location: 10995 N Bayview Rd. Southold, NY 11971 (provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: Dan Hall / Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. (If applicable) Address. PO Box 1060 Riverhead, NY 11901 Phone (631 ) 727-2400---- Board of `trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet) 348,209 s.f. Area Zoning Residential Previous use of property. Residential Intended use of property. Residential Prior permits/approvals for site improvements* Agency Date e No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Inas any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? X No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary) Please See Attached Project Description. L®giudiee ® Southold Project Description: Applicant proposes to construct a 4'x 108' fixed timber catwalk with a boat lift. The catwalk is proposed to be elevated a minimum of 4' above the AHWM and will utilize (4) 4"x4" piles with a depth of penetration 6'+, and(26) 6" Dia.timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10'+. The boat lift is proposed to be an"Alum-A-Vator"utilizing (8) 10" Dia. timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10'+. Board of Trustees Appiicatzon WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations. Recreational mooring Area of wetlands on lot 0 square feet Percent coverage of lot 0 % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 125+/- feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 0 feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? X No Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? N/A cubic yards e How much material will be filled? N/A cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: N/A feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: N/A Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: N/A Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): This project will not have any effect on the adjacent wetland areas. Only during construction activities night there be minimal effects from siltation etc. PROJECT ID NUMBER 61720 L SEQR APPENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART 1 -PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 1 APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2.PROJECT NAME D Hall/Land Use for J. LoGiudice LoGiudice-Southold 3 PROJECT LOCATION- Southold Suffolk Municipality County 4 PRECISE LOCATION: Street Addess and Road Intersections, Prominent landmarks etc -or provide map 10995 N. Bayview Rd. Southold, NY SCTM# 1000-79-5-20.13 5.IS PROPOSED ACTION ❑1 New ❑Expansion ❑Modification/alteration 6 DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY Please See Project Description. 7.AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED, Initially 8+/- acres Ultimately 8+/- acres 8.WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? ❑✓ Yes ❑ No If no,describe briefly: 9 WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply.) RResidential ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Agriculture ❑Park/Forest/Open Space ❑Other (describe) 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (Federal, State or Local) RlYes ❑No If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: NYSDEC, NYSDOS, USACOE, and Southold Trustees 11.DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ❑Yes -1No If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: 12 AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? []Yes ❑✓ No 1 CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant / Sponsor Name Dan Hall / Land Use Ecological Services, Inc Date:May 11,2004 Signature_ If the action is a Costal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment PART If- IMPACT ASSESSMENT To be completed by Lead Agency A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617 4? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF DI Yes 1:1 No B WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617 6? If No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency 0 Yes ❑ No C COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING.(Answers may be handwritten,if legible) C1 Existing air quality,surface or groundwater quality or quantity,noise levels,existing traffic pattern,solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly Ies J C rb5,-Qn 4SS Ue S WTI- C2 ice+C2 Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological,historic,or other natural or cultural resources,or community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly J@SJ f�eSe�-,c d� ,,.,z re Sov� J Sl,o�tcne a-Coi ca d,�lea. C3. Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species?Explain briefly. S) LA, �Cr 014 4Lz- Ve.C4w-�J n f c Y'iy�zr�.y -C-S� r a-t+-n S, h n rSe S L'--e CA-ctl- . C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly. Cr- h c-l- k0,4c ¢ . C5 Growth,subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly h CrcAs'P �n C6 Longterm,short term,cumulative,or other effects not identified in C1-05? Explaiin�briefly: 11 T,r G,C'VS O n all -+N rr. c c( ��'4a l 0 1--1 W Cz- a a M uy c C7 Other impacts including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy? Explain briefly F- - D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON✓✓THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA(CEA)? If es,ex Iain briefl R1 Yes ®No F- E IS THERE,OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE,CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? If yes explain Yes El No PART III-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE(To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large,important or otherwise significant Each effect should be assessed in connection with its(a)setting(i.e.urban or rural),(b)probability of occurring;(c)duration;(d)irreversibility;(e) geographic scope;and(f)magnitude. If necessary,add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question d of part ii was checked yes,the determination of significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur.Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation,that the proposed actio WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide, on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting thi determination (4 (U—c.cf Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) r 7 Logiudice - Southold Project Description: Applicant proposes to construct a 4'x108'fixed timber catwalk with a boat lift. The catwalk is proposed to be elevated a minimum of 4' above the AHWM and will utilize (4) 4"x4" piles with a depth of penetration 6'+, and(26) 6" Dia. timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10'+. The boat lift is proposed to be an"Alum-A-Vator"utilizing(8) 10" Dia. timber piles with a depth of penetration of 10'+. .1 Albert J. Krupski,President ��OFC� Town Hall James King,Vice-President h`� G�f. 53095 Route 25 Z 1 P.O.Box 1179 Artie Foster ep Ken Poliwoda Z Southold,New York 11971-0959 Peggy A.Dickerson Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD --------------------------------------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of %Aac�-------------- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING f 1 , residing at &-ezi 2)r PvW91z7_ /v_ being duly sworn, depose and say: YX That on the I�day of (J N 200 , I personally posted the pro e known as 10�� 5 v e c5u �7 by placing the Board of Trustees Official poster where it can easily be seen, dnd that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight da s prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held llr�r, �� ®� low Dated: a e) Sworn to before me this '241 d o e200 CYNTHIA ALVAREZ NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK No.01AL6080878 t Public QUALIFIED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY MYCOMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.23,20 " PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address : Daniel&Janice Scotto 11045 N Bayview Rd. Southold,NY 11971 George J. Berry 10007 N. Bayview Rd. Southold,NY 11971 Robert&Joan Rocchetta PO Box 1704 Southold,NY 11971 James C. III&Patricia Boyle 10205 N. Bayview Rd. Southold,NY 11971 Peconic Land Trust 296 Hampton Rd. Southampton,NY 11968 �7 Clifford, Jr. &Lorraine Cornell 22 Wright Rd. Rockville Center,N.Y. 11570 Clifford&Ruth Cornell PO Box 910 Southold,NY 11971 Michael&James Collura 26 Heather Lane,New York,NY 10040 Virginia Principi 10947 North Bayview Rd. Southold,NY 11971 ,., STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK residing at being duly sworn, de oses and says that on he ay of deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth i.n the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at 1r�<'/ceza/ , that said Notices were mailed- to each of said persons by (certified), (registered) mail . 1 Swor o before me this CYNTHIA ALVAREZ d O NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK QUALIFIED N SUFFOLK COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT:23,20 y N ary Public �� Board of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York Dan Hall/Land Use Ecoloai ra 1 se vi rA� T�_BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S)AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S)OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 1200 CYNTHIA ALVAREZ NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK -� No.01 AL6080878 QUALIFIED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY taryPublic MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.23,20U _'i-111,1 •11 1 -1 11;- 'i- - - I-U r_ 11 i_f- ka, ;;,t t 7 . 3u5 I_.,0:I i tiL c,11C.M,(c U. 0o uu,: Duma of Tru.stces ri�ptj<-'at -Lura 4 AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant; is not the owner) I Joseph LoGiudice residing at 4062 Grucr¢n m Blvd. (print owner of property) (mailing address) Bldg. 74 C alverton., NY 11933-1502 do hereby authorize Dan Hall (Agent) Land Use Ecological Service-5, Ync, to apply for permit(s) from the Southold Board of Town Trustees on my behalf. er s signature) e s 05.10.04 WIN 08: 26 [TX/RX NO 76141 X1002 1 LandUse May 11, 2004 Town of Southold Board of Town Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 C 0 I Re: LoGiudice - Southold D Proposed Catwalk with Boat Lift MA l 14 2004 To whom it may concern: ! Southold Town Enclosed please find an application packag which irid dd - (1) original, (2) copies of the completed application form. - (1) original, (2) copies of a Short Environmental Assessment Form - (3) sets of Plans. -Application fee ($200.00). If there are any questions, or if you require additional information please don't hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Dan Hall Land Use Ecological Services, Inc. DH Enc. PO Box 1060 • Village Dock, Riverhead, New York • 11901 631-727-2400 • FAX 631-727-2605