Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
7472
� 7 Csn r6-fci Ste ��o- layRril Xu L � , _� PR 1 41� f�. 00 lbw Oft%A r r In Ali e. non, r+ tan e AA- .'47 jo it o <ec °` �2q /] Co-) l .� i ',� CHECK BOXES AS COMPLETED ( ) Tape this form to outsi __--r-` ( ) Pull ZBA copy of ND CO a a j ( ) Check file boxes for pri 3 N ( ) Assign"next number or o outside of file folder ( ) Date stamp entire orig m -n -u z -u G) co 0 i v = O v W Cn O file number x o o m o ,y T. C W o -� v E, ( ) Hole punch entire orifi v m 77 c x � m i= i O N) 5- CL 0 (before sending to T.C. Cn ( ) Create new index card Z ( ) Print contact info & tal �- -< C Q CD ( ) Prepare transmittal to m n c ( ) Send original applicatic C 0 rn to Town Clerk n. co CD ( ) Note inside file folder N c c and tape to inside of f(. b ' CL "o CD ( ) Copy County Tax MW-8 3: cD ( Make 7 copies and put ( ) Do mailing label -4 - N ' No i" i i BOARD MEMBERS ���f $0 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 Southold Town Hall (/r Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson yo Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lennert,Jr. • a� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento IyCoUNT`l Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.govRECEIVED Q�p ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS & (l� 6 9:S MM TOWN OF SOUTHOLDAUG 7 2022 Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION outh0ld Town Clerk MEETING OF AUGUST 4, 2022 ZBA FILE# 7472 -AMENDED PER COURT ORDER August 4,2022 NAME OF APPLICANT: Cottage on Third LLC PROPERTY LOCATION: 850 Third Street,New Suffolk SCTM No. 1000-117-8-7 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was not required to be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23. LWRP DETERMINATION: The relief, permit, or interpretation requested in this application is listed under the Minor Actions exempt list and is not subject to review under Chapter 268. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The subject 8,420.6 square foot, non-conforming rectangular parcel located in the R40 zoning district measures 96.71feet fronting on Third Street with a northern lot line of 86.13 feet shared with a residential neighbor, an eastern lot line of 98.94 feet along a second residential neighbor and a Southern lot line of 86.10 feet shared with a third residential neighbor. The site is improved with a 2-story frame house and an in-ground swimming pool. All is shown on a survey prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin L.L.S. last revised December 15, 2019 and a Site Plan drawing prepared by John J. Condon P.E. dated May 10,2019. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variance(s) from Sections 280-124 and the Building Inspector's January 13,2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct a new accessory pool house/garage; at 1)more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20% located at: 850 Third Street,New Suffolk,NY RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a variance to construct a garage/pool house that will result in lot coverage of 22.91%where code permits a maximum lot coverage of 20%. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The subject parcel previously received variance relief in ZBA decision # 7193 for a non-conforming front yard setback of 4.1 feet. In that decision the ZBA denied the variance request for non- conforming lot coverage of 25.47%. In support of the application the applicant submitted prior ZBA decision's # 6931 for a parcel located at 865 Second Street,New Suffolk # 7272 for a parcel located at 16500 Main Street,New Suffolk # 6270 1175 First Street,New Suffolk Page 2,August 4,2022 #7472, Cottage on Third SCTM No. 1000-117-8-7 # 6020 and 6127 for a parcel at 735 Jackson Street,New Suffolk # 7392 for a parcel located at 1175 Second street,New Suffolk # 6595 for a parcel located at 1060 Second Street,New Suffolk # 6462 for a parcel located at 2395 Jackson street,New Suffolk The subject application is distinguished from the variance relief granted in ZBA application 6931 located at 865 Second Street,New Suffolk because the applicant in appeal 46931 was working with an existing house and parcel's structures had code conforming front yard setbacks and were screened from the street by existing mature plantings so they would not be visible from the street. The subject applicant's home is 4.1 feet from the front property line and there is insufficient area to plant vegetative screening that would be in character with the neighborhood. The subject application is distinguished from ZBA appeal # 7272 for a parcel located at 16500 Main Street, New Suffolk because the parcel was developed prior to zoning and had a history of being a boarding house/hotel and a five-family residence. The variance alterations and additions made to the parcel over the years brought the parcel into greater conformity with the code in that it is now a code conforming use as a single-family residence. The subject application is distinguished from ZBA appeal # 6270 located at 1175 First Street in that the variance required was for a de minimus 8.11-foot x 9.2-foot addition to the house to accommodate a bilco door and small additional living space. The subject application for non-conforming lot coverage will add an additional structure to the property. The subject application is distinguished from ZBA appeal # 6020 and #6127 for a parcel located at 735 Jackson Street because the excessive lot coverage in#6020 was created by the construction of a pergola which is a visually and physically open structure as opposed to a solid, enclosed structure as proposed by the subject applicant. The granting of non-conforming lot coverage for a swimming pool granted in ZBA appeal #6127 was mitigated by the planting of evergreen screening. The subject parcel has a non-conforming front yard setback of 4.1 feet and there is insufficient area to plant vegetative screening that would be in character with the neighborhood. The subject application is distinguished from ZBA appeal# 7392 located at 1175 Second Street because that appeal was primarily for a second story addition over an existing structure. The subject application is distinguished from ZBA appeal # 6773 because that parcel is located in an MII zoning district, in contrast to the subject parcel which is zoned R-40 The subject application is distinguished from ZBA appeal# 6595 for a parcel located at 1060 Second Street because that variance request was for a porch addition that would be open and unenclosed and did not propose to locate an additional structure on the property. The subject application is distinguished from ZBA appeal # 2395 Jackson Street, New Suffolk because in that application the applicant demolished an existing accessory garage and built a garage attached to the existing house. Several neighbors spoke against the application at the hearing. AMENDED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: An Article 78 proceeding was filed by the applicant/petitioner (Cottage on Third LLC) against the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals(respondent) requesting that the denial by the ZBA of the relief requested for an area variance for 22.91% lot coverage by annulled and reversed.In a judgement dated September 14,2021 by Hon.Kathy G.Bergman, Supreme Court-State of New York,Part 6 Suffolk County,the court upheld the petitioner's request and ordered the ZBA to grant the area variance. Page 3,August 4,2022 #7472,Cottage on Third SCTM No. 1000-117-8-7 FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on March 4, 2021 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law X267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variance will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. While New Suffolk is densely developed and many small lots feature a primary residence and accessory structures, few small lots enjoy the benefit of both accessory structures and an inground swimming pool. 2. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue,other than an area variance. The applicant has improved the subject property with a new dwelling and in ground swimming pool which together create 18.7% lot coverage. Any application to construct an accessory garage/pool house will require the benefit of an area variance. 3. Town Law§267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance applied for herein is mathematically substantial, representing 14.55% relief from the code. 4. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(4). No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. 5. Town Law X267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant is currently developing the parcel as "new construction." The applicant removed the existing structures on the parcel and had a blank slate to build within the code permitted lot coverage. The applicant's request for non-conforming lot coverage was previously denied in ZBA appeal#7193 dated September 20,2018 and the applicant choose to use the code permitted lot coverage for the swimming pool and two-story residence instead of an accessory garage as originally proposed. 6.Town Law§267-b. Grant of the requested relief is not the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of an additional structure while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Weisman(Chairperson), seconded by Member Dantes, and duly carried, to DENY., plied for-, ver , AMENDED DECISION TO GRANT THE REQUESTED RELIEF AS APPLIED FOR PER COURT ORDER DATED SEPTEMBER 14,2021 Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Weisman(Chairperson)Dantes,Planamento,Acampora, and Lehnert. This Resolution was duly adopted(5-0) e ie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson pproved for filing / % /2022 t =WEST CREEK ' PLAN I DESIGN I BUILD �� July 11, 2022 Town of Southold Building Department Town Hall Annex 54375 Route 25, Southold, NY 11971 RE: Construction of Detached Garage/PoolHouse '.•a �Dd��' 850 Third Street, New Suffolk, NY 11956 SCTIVI # 1000-117-8-7 Building Department Enclosed is a Building Permit Application package for the construction of a detached Garage/Pool House at 850 Third Street, New Suffolk NY, 11956. Please note that Zoning Board of Appeals request for Area Variance #7472 for this structure . was denied and then subsequently granted through an Article 78 proceeding; a copy of which is attached, filed with the Suffolk County Clerk, and Town of Southold Attorney. If you require additional information or have any questions, please contact me at 631-334-9205 or gary(a)-westcreekbuilders com. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Sincerely, Gary Steinfeld West Creek Builders, LLC Agent for Applicant P.O. BOX 256, NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 TEL 631.334.9205 [FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 9971-67-2621 03 : 18 PVA INDEX NO. 607301/2021 NYSqE�F DOS. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/16/2021 SUPREME COURT- STATE OF NEW YORK ..RART,!'6!--SUFF0LK COUNTY PRESENT: HON.-KATHY G., BERGM-ANN Supreme Court.-justice COTTAGE ON THIRD LLC, INDEX N 0.: .40.710112.02 MOT. SEQ, 90,1: (p)3-24-2.1 PetitioneIri -8 0) -2421 MG Againsf- SOUTHOLD-TOWN ZONING.B.. DECISION AND ORDER. OYAPPEALS Respandenta This.is an article 78 proceedift&6ek-1ng--r.'evicw. of adete muhnation of the respondent. 'I . I under appeal#7472.("thede6isioii")BW'3-24�--21 ca �:Sppcifi lly;petitioner requests that the decision denying its,'requett'..for.afi..-greOVO.lanCe be ianhulled and-reyet8dd as arbitrary and capricious; petitioner also allegesthe decision is the.subject.of 5'a standard-of review that is Unlawful.and discriminatory" (petitiolliqt, ispx4e4reaMeni of re st 7!"4")..in ih es-d" at it involves ..quq s for area variances:.for improved-parcels".:(such as.petitioner's)and"requests for variance,of improved parcels. The hearing Ieading to the:deois'.1idIny undetie*wag-held-on March 4j-202 1. The revi -decision notes ihai neighborhood resid6nts.'were-heard.who.opposed the application tion before- yespondeftt. Petitioner owns a1ot-improvedlby!a I faiijilk.ros�dence-and.in-gro�Md swiniming-pool. 'The-decision:iecites that the subject prqpar.`ty is:ah 8;420.6 square fo0 , t..noricomf6rhiMi & rectangular parcel fronting on Third:S_ b'*tJn NeW Suffolk,New Yoik-. 'The-subj'cct parcel-is bordered by 3.other residential' 'lots- Itis in the.R40 zoning.district which provides.for-maximum lot coverage of 20%. PefifiohWs exist' .tnk brie fimily residence and pool.together cover 1-8.7%of petitioner"slot. Essentially; in-the.ap 11ca on 4fid: pli or review herein,the petitioner proposed to -add a.combihed pool house/garage -a - 1%of ol . so/ WW&would result in lot coverage-of 22 .9 Petitioner's lot. C06iderifig of the factors-under Town Lhw;.§267-;d,'this.Court finds that the decision"m application#7471 was.arbitrary and diicnm miato'ry,as claimed by petitioner:petitioner: t The.Court observes as alleged in 1h.c.-instant:petition,ihatNe $40ik contains.a--densely-populated residential region- _ ............ FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 09/16/2021 03 : 18 P INDEX NO. 607301/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 i RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/16/2021 consisting:of small parcels with avera , size of about 10;40 square I feet'(see petition herein at. "F). 'The adjoining residential-lot(next a petit oner's)in-2016 Guider respondent's-dedision #6931)received an"area variance-to pe> dt lot'coverage.of 23.7% (to`-convert:ari:existin:g garage: to habitable living.-space and to build Am"ew,;sep' ate,-accessory garage): Underthe:facts existing here.the decision under review is arbitt' 'an .:capric ous and is theTefore'anaulled and petition er:'s.requestfor an area variancetb perimt 22.91%lot coverage(based upon the.proposal as ptesented to respondent)is granted: -Settle judgment. s ' go.ordered: + ENTER Dated: September:14, 2021 ' .. '. Riverhead,New York mi . THY GZ.tRGMANN, J.S.C. f HON.KAT H'y G.BERGMANN _A—FIIVAL DISPOSITIOri _ NON-FINAL,DISPOSITION i i i :E •t S ' E .1 As noted in the:decisiori.under*revi&v,.the petitioner rimade.a.prior different.application to respotiderit in 2018-(ZBA appeal#7193)�eekng approval.of the re constructioim,of the then existing dwelling, installation o£a,pool and accessary pool:houselgarage all of which would.have resulted.ih. coverage of 25.4.734 ofthe lot;that prior application' or•ati area variance was denied;petitioner then proceeded with.eonstrucfion of.the two story residence and pool. "f i i i ._ .,._ _,_,_.._-.,.,.-.. .., SSSS._.. ..........................,.._ . _SSSS ............. :2...a£_2..W, __- _ _«. _SSS S. .. ...._......._....._SSSS_.... BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson 53095$®��iy®l 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 p Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patriciara Office Location: Erricc Danantes tes y� Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento ®f�C®U N Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ly ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS RECEIVE® TOWN OF SOUTHOLD #t,'4IZ:01Tel.(631)765-1809 •Fax(631)765-9064 AR 2 4 2021 FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATI /[¢ �'�n�A 0. MEETING OF MARCH 18,2021 S®ui ®Id Town Clerk ZBA FILE# 7472 NAME OF APPLICANT: Cottage on Third LLC PROPERTY LOCATION: 850 Third Street,New Suffolk SCTM No. 1000-117-8-7 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type 11 category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was not required to be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23. LWRP DETERMINATION: The relief, permit, or interpretation requested in this application is listed under the Minor Actions exempt list and is not subject to review under Chapter 268. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The subject 8,420.6 square foot, non-conforming rectangular parcel located in the R40 zoning district measures 96.71feet fronting on Third Street with a northern lot line of 86.13 feet shared with a residential neighbor, an eastern lot line of 98.94 feet along a second residential neighbor and a Southern lot line of 86.10 feet shared with a third residential neighbor. The site is improved with a 2-story frame house and an in-ground swimming pool. All is shown on a survey prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin L.L.S. last revised December 15,2019 and a Site Plan drawing prepared by John J. Condon P.E. dated May 10,2019. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variance(s) from Sections 280-124 and the Building Inspector's January 13,2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct a new accessory pool house/garage; at 1)more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20% located at: 850 Third Street,New Suffolk,NY RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a variance to construct a garage/pool house that will result in lot coverage of 22.91%where code permits a maximum lot coverage of 20%. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The subject parcel previously received variance relief in ZBA decision # 7193 for a non-conforming front yard setback of 4.1 feet. In that decision the ZBA denied the variance request for non- conforming lot coverage of 25.47%. In support of the application the applicant submitted prior ZBA decision's # 6931 for a parcel located at 865 Second Street,New Suffolk # 7272 for a parcel located at 16500 Main Street,New Suffolk # 6270 1175 First Street,New Suffolk # 6020 and 6127 for a parcel at 735 Jackson Street,New Suffolk #7392 for a parcel located at 1175 Second street,New Suffolk # 6595 for a parcel located at 1060 Second Street,New Suffolk Page 2,March 18,2021 #7472,Cottage on Third SCTM No. 1000-117-8-7 # 6462 for a parcel located at 2395 Jackson street,New Suffolk The subject application is distinguished from the variance relief granted in ZBA application 6931 located at 865 Second Street,New Suffolk because the applicant in appeal#6931 was working with an existing house and parcel's structures had code conforming front yard setbacks and were screened from the street by existing mature plantings so they would not be visible from the street. The subject applicant's home is 4.1 feet from the front property line and there is insufficient area to plant vegetative screening that would be in character with the neighborhood. The subject application is distinguished from ZBA appeal # 7272 for a parcel located at 16500 Main Street, New Suffolk because the parcel was developed prior to zoning and had a history of being a boarding house/hotel and a five-family residence. The variance alterations and additions made to the parcel over the years brought the parcel into greater conformity with the code in that it is now a code conforming use as a single-family residence. The subject application is distinguished from ZBA appeal # 6270 located at 1175 First Street in that the variance required was for a de minimus 8.11-foot x 9.2-foot addition to the house to accommodate a bilco door and small additional living space. The subject application for non-conforming lot coverage will add an additional structure to the property. The subject application is distinguished from ZBA appeal # 6020 and #6127 for a parcel located at 735 Jackson Street because the excessive lot coverage in 46020 was created by the construction of a pergola which is a visually and physically open structure as opposed to a solid, enclosed structure as proposed by the subject applicant. The granting of non-conforming lot coverage for a swimming pool granted in ZBA appeal #6127 was mitigated by the planting of evergreen screening. The subject parcel has a non-conforming front yard setback of 4.1 feet and there is insufficient area to plant vegetative screening that would be in character with the neighborhood. The subject application is distinguished from ZBA appeal#7392 located at 1175 Second Street because that appeal was primarily for a second story addition over an existing structure. The subject application is distinguished from ZBA appeal # 6773 because that parcel is located in an MII zoning district, in contrast to the subject parcel which is zoned R-40 The subject application is distinguished from ZBA appeal# 6595 for a parcel located at 1060 Second Street because that variance request was for a porch addition that would be open and unenclosed and did not propose to locate an additional structure on the property. The subject application is distinguished from ZBA appeal # 2395 Jackson Street, New Suffolk because in that application the applicant demolished an existing accessory garage and built a garage attached to the existing house. Several neighbors spoke against the application at the hearing. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on March 4,2021 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variance will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. While New Suffolk is densely developed and many small lots feature a primary residence and accessory structures, few small lots enjoy the benefit of both accessory structures and an inground swimming pool. Page 3,March 18,2021 #7472,Cottage on Third SCTM No. 1000-117-8-7 2. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue,other than an area variance. The applicant has improved the subject property with a new dwelling and in ground swimming pool which together create 18.7% lot coverage. Any application to construct an accessory garage/pool house will require the benefit of an area variance. 3. Town Law.4267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance applied for herein is mathematically substantial,representing 14.55% relief from the code. 4. Town Law X267-b(3)(b)(4). No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. 5. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant is currently developing the parcel as "new construction." The applicant removed the existing structures on the parcel and had a blank slate to build within the code permitted lot coverage. The applicant's request for non-conforming lot coverage was previously denied in ZBA appeal#7193 dated September 20,2018 and the applicant choose to use the code permitted lot coverage for the swimming pool and two-story residence instead of an accessory garage as originally proposed. 6.Town Law X267-b. Grant of the requested relief is not the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of an additional structure while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B,motion was offered by Member Dantes, seconded by Member Acampora, and duly carried, to DENY as applied for, Vote of the Board. Ayes:Members Weisman (Chairperson), 4campora, Dantes, Lehnert, and Planamento This Resolution was duly adopted(5-0). Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing /(� /2021 ti SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITUATE N/0/F NEW SUFFOLK WALTER & GARANCE WERT,HVULLER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD o & CIL & ELLEN GOLDSTEIN W SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Z DWELLING o S.C. TAX No. 1000-117-08-07 w USES PUBLIC WATER z SCALE 1"=20' �z 3 S 87° 14'0077 r �� E 8 6. 1 3' NOVEMBER)23, 2019ARY 1STAKE01FOUNDATION ° ° DE NCE DECEMBER 15, 2019 FOUNDATION LOCATION KA r ° I CONC. M .5'Oww .N. ) TOTAL LOT AREA = 8,421 sq. ft. I`C'I d �p 2.5's. o W 0) I Q0.193 ac. C) :r o a pi I ° MI 00 N I � NOTES: 1. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.A.V.D. 1988 DATUM LIZ ° �p RECf-IVED' H 04 U d WZ N �z1j+ 3-:, \--IS �41� D a WOW �w w JAN 14 Z02i 2 y Q. o ` `d Q C3 LU �z U o o Zoning Board Of Appeals , as " 09 W C ' ° 4 O - Uli No ° W U d � W O � 10.9 24.0' O d 4 ° Z �I O N MI ^ • I NI ''O/ e Z O v/ PREPARED I '1RTi{3FIE MINIMUM NCE STAND OR,iTfEFi6S A94kWAguSHEO ° 00 0.8'S. Gt ANDrAP g(V1 MI PICKET FENCE FO u I E�W.lil F YQRK@STATE,LAND ADOPTED d 6' N 850459009' W 3"sE y"^cAle ® C3 �� 86. 10' ,/ ��' '% DWEd USES PUBLIC WATER N/0/F °p KEITH HABER oA HABER o & ANIT Y.S. Lic. No. 50467 UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION Nathan -aft Corwin III TO THIS SURVEY Is A VIOLATION OF O SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE �0: EDUCATION LAW. Surveyor op COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING W INKEDTHE LAND SURVEYOR'S EMBOSSED SEALL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY. CERTIFICATIONS INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN Successor To: Stanley J. Isaksen, Jr. L.S. ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY Joseph A. Ingegno L.S. MAIN �" ��1 1� T Ti PREPMED,AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE 1\CCC/JeL L/�iL 1 STREET ILL ' �j TITLE COMPSTIT GOVERNMENTAL EON'AGENCY AND Title Surveys —Subdivisions — Site Plans — Conshucfion Layout I`J JL -01 IJ. L LENDING ASSIGNEES LISTED HEREON,AND TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INFER PHONE (631)727-2090 Fax (631)727-1727 TUITION.CERTIFICATIONS ARE NOT 777ANSFERABLE. THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS OFFICES LOCATED AT kWUNG ADDRESS AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, IF 1586 Main Road P.O. Box 16 ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. Jamesport, New York 11947 Jamesport, New York 11947 t SITE DATA SCTM# 1000-117-8-1 PROPERTY: 850 THIRD STREET POOL ENCLOSURE NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 OWNER: THIRD STREET COTTAGE,LLC ZONING: Roo 2Z4 --_ _-__ -Sb.13' — — -- —_ RECEIVED 5 7° 14'E -7 1-f -7 LOT AREA � rh y 2I --- ---------- 1 TOTAL LOT AREA 8,420.b 5F 0.193 AG II /e x iI JAN 14 ?021 Lu C; 1 �p PROPOSED LOT COVERALL GE LLL. I1 15E125OGAL K/ � _/ i Zoning Beard Of Appeals EXISTING HOUSE 1,0685F Z) i ST t :' T�o� e i EXISTING POOL 512 5F PROP05ED GARAGEIPOOLHOU5E 349 SF �. N I TOTAL PROPOSED 1,929 5F 22.91% w I ENTRY \ PROPSED PATIO it I 5TEP51 �— DE -- ON- , e ti Ili 11.7' SITE PLAN BASED ON SURVEY BY; zU 16' I NATHAN TAFT COR 41N III LAND SURVEYOR Q I �s i Q 1 b8 F p 1586 MAIN ROAD,JAMES FORT, NY 11941 20.4' 216 14;' DATED JANUARY 1-1,2019 WES Lu T CREED o _ Iw i Lu I N ; I i I a ° o z _ I PLAN DESIGN BUILD w I b—I N 44. NT x 32' I N DRAWING5 RY STEPS I WEST GREEK BUILDERS PO BOX 256 NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 LOCATION MAP --------- ',� ---------- ENTRY PORCH I N.T.S. ISSUE/REV151ON5 �9 PENCE' 05.10.1 qO T - -------CoA`d - -•--- '••. •� OST I ............. ` ------- - DW lA N I POOL �o ry DINN 15.5 5 EMIRPROJECT �o I i Z' �., STONE DRIVE ° o I POOL ENCLOSURE COTTAGE ON THIRD ------ - 850 THIRD STREET (4'HIGH) __ - -- - ----- --------- - --- �22.5' I — — 8b T' _ NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 w _ _ ---------------------- :3 _ _ pF�oNlcegY N8— W -- — -----� I : ---' 1000-111-6-1 ra Ln g DR,4WIN SITE PLAN GARAGEMOOL HOUSE PROJECT NORTH SITE PLAN - PQOL � SCALE : 1" = 15' 051684 �� 5 ��C tVED JAN � 4Z®Z .ZO61n9 Board Of APPea1s in 21'-11" I ui r r I WEST CREEK PLAN I DESIGN I BUILD Ln CIADR,4ldlNGS WEST GREEK BUILDERS 2266 i p"- 6ARAC7E $ PO BOX 256 MULTI-PURP05E NEW 5UFFOLK, NY 11 q56 Q ROOM in �j - � ROOM c`V 155UE/REVISIONS 05.10.1 q PROJECT 12' COTTAGE ON THIRD 850 THIRD STREET NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11 q56 1000 FLOOR PLAN ).sEW SCALE : 1/4 - 1 GARAGE/POOL HOUSE s � , FLOOR PLAN Al l REEC]EIVED /'f 7Z JAN 2 4� 2021 Zoning Burd Of Appeals WEST CREEK :�.. PLAN � DESIGN � BUILD DRAWING5 Ln WEST GREEK BUILDERS PO BOX 256 NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11856 15SUE/REVISION5 05.10.1 q PROJECT COTTAGE ON THIRD 850 THIRD STREET �r `S p W NESUFFOLK, NY 11 g5b NORTH ELEVATION v t 4 SCALE ■ 1/4" = 1' 1000-111-8-7 -�4_ � = DR�4WING t �' - GARAGE/POOL HOUSE GFES ELEVATION r, • 2 RECEIVED --I Li 77 JAN 14 2021 Zoning Board OfAppeals WEST CREEK PLAN I DESIGN I BUILD DRANINC75 in WEST GREEK BUILDERS PO BOX 256 NEW 5UFFOLK, NY 11856 1551JE/REVISIONS 05.10.1 q PROJECT COTTAGE ON THIRD 550 THIRD STREET SOUTH ELEVATION NEW 5UFFOLK, NY 11856 SCALE : 1/4" - 1' - ; 1000-111-a-1 2RAVgIN6 GARAGE/POOL HOUSE "f ELEVATION U A3 ESSI r ' RECEIVED JAN ��7 z 021 Zoning Burd Of q ppear5 WEST CREED PLAN I DESIGN I BUILD m •- DRAV41NG5 I WEST GREEK BUILDERS 111111 PO BOX 256 NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 ISSUE/REVISIONS ly- L] Li I Li 1j Sz 05.10.19 PROJECT COTTAGE ON THIRD 550 THIRD 5TREET WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 11 SCALE : 1/4" = 1' SCALE : 1/4" = 1' " 1000-11 -b-17�F DRAWING q RANGE/POOL HOUSE ELEVATION5 05 '° of�ssto�°"' A4 .:S i ✓:4- r - 1 � - 1 FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: October 26,2020 RENEWED: January 13,2021 TO: Gary Steinfeld(Cottage on Third LLC) PO Box 256 New Suffolk,NY 11956 R1=C:= O Please take notice that your application dated October 16, 2020 74-7,)- For 4-7For permit to construct a new accessory pool house/garage at JAN 14 2029 Location of property 850 Third Street,New Suffolk,NY Zoning Board Of Appeals County Tax Map No. 1000- Section 117 Block 8 Lot 7 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this non-conforming 8,420 square foot lot in the R-40 District is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII, Section 280-124,which states that on lots measuring less than 20,000 square feet in total size, a maximum lot coverage of 20% is allowed. Following the proposed construction,there will be a total lot coverage of 22.91%. A�it orized Signatu CC: file,Z.B.A. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require additional review from the Southold Town Building Department. ,1 I FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: October 26, 2020 TO: Gary Steinfeld(Cottage on Third LLC) PO Box 256 New Suffolk,NY 11956 Please take notice that your application dated October 16, 2020 For permit to construct a new in-ground swimming pool and a new accessory pool house/garage as at Location of property 850 Third Street,New Suffolk,NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 117 Block 8 Lot -- 7 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this non-conforming 8,420 square foot lot in the R-40 District is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII, Section 280-124,which states that, on lots measuring less than 20,000 square feet in total size, a maximum lot coverage of 20%is allowed. Following the proposed construction there will be a total lot coverage of 22.91%. RECEIVED N 14 2B21 Authorized Signature Zbt16 �a ��pf�P�ea�s` CC: file, Z.B.A. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require additional review from the Southold Town Building Department. Fee:$ Filed By: Assignment No. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE House No. 850 Street Third Street Hamlet New Suffolk SCTM 1000 Section 117 Block 8 Lot(s) 7 Lot Size 8420.6 SF Zone R40 I(WE)APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATEDOctober 26, 2020 BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED May 10, 2019 . Owner(s): Cottage on Third LLCrR Mailing Address: 26 Remsen Street Brooklyn, NY 11201 Telephone: 917-568-6525 Fax: Email: W14-2021_ L33f) arr+ r f NOTE:In addition to the above,please complete below if application is signed by applicant's atter�� ,"a ZiB(14® �a�peafs builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person who agent represents: - Name of Representative: Gary Steinfeld for( )Owner()00ther: Agent Address: West Creek Builders, PO Box 256, New Suffolk, NY 11956 Telephone: 631-334-9205 Fax: Email: garyCcD_westcreekbuilders.coim Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to,from the above names: ( )Applicant/Owner(s), 00 Authorized Representative, ( )Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED-1 0-26-20 and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 10-16-20 FOR: (�Building Permit ( )Certificate of Occupancy ( )Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ( )Change of Use ( )Permit for As-Built Construction ( ) Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article,Section,Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers.Do not quote the code.) Article: XXIII Section: 280-124 Subsection: Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: ()o A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( )A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ( )Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ( )Reversal or Other A prior appeal 0()has, ( )has not been made at any time with respect to this property,UNDER Appeal No(s). 7193 Year(s). 9018 .(Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our officefor assistance) Name of Owner: ZBA File# Cottage on Third, LLC 7193 REASONS FOR APPEAL (Please be specific, additional sheets may be used with preparer's signature notarized). 1.An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted,because:The neighborhood contains numerous existing principal and accessory structures with non-conforming lot coverages due to the relatively small parcel sizes. There is a grassy buffer of 15-16 feet between the edge of road pavement and the property line. A garage/pool house and swimming pool are customary structures to a single family dwelling and will be sited with conforming side and rear yard setbacks. 2.The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance,because: Available lot area for the detached garage/pool house is limited by the relatively small size of 8,421 sq. ft. parcel. 3.The amount of relief requested is not substantial because:The accessory garage/poolhouse structure will maintain code conforming setbacks and building heights. Parcel is one of the smaller lots in the area and will have similar levels of non-conformance of lot coverage to many of the neighboring properties. Existing dwelling has a modest 1888 SF habitable space. 4.The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: There is no evidence to suggest that the requested variances in this community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood. The proposed project will comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. RECzIVED � �q� 5.Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? {X}Yes,or{ }No Why: JAN 1 4 Z02I Applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect. Zoning Beard Of Appeals Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land? {x}No { }Yes(please furnish a copy) This is the N [NLVfUM that is necessary and adequate,and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. Signature of A scant or Author' ed Agent (Agent must sub rt written Authorizati n from Owner) Swo to before me this !� day of 20__'�A. Notary P lic' LYNDSEY BARKER NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK No. 01 BA6156676 Qualified in Suffolk County 'a, Commission Expires November 27,20� APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: Cottage on Third LLC DATE PREPARED: April 25, 2018 1.For Demolition of Existing Building Areas RECEIVED Please describe areas being removed: 7L�10- A _ 71 H.New Construction Areas(New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Zoning Board Of Appeals Dimensions of first floor extension: 15.5'x 22.5'Accessory Garage/Poolhouse Dimensions of new second floor: Dimensions of floor above second level: Height(from finished ground to top of ridge): 15'-1 1/4" Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed?If yes,please provide height(above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: IH.Proposed Construction Description(Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary).Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: Existing 2 story single family dwelling & 16'x 32'Swimming Pool Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: Addition of accessory garage/poolhouse 15.5'x 22.5' IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage(from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: 1068 SF Proposed increase of building coverage: 349 SF Accessory Garage/Poolhouse Square footage of your lot: 8420.6 Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: Existinq 18.76% Proposed 22.91% V.Purpose of New Construction: New accessory garage/pool-house VI.Please describe the land contours(flat,slope%, heavily wooded,marsh area,etc.)on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): Flat Please submit 8 sets of photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction,and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 f QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION 7JAN VED A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? �_7�Yes X No 2021 B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? X No Yes please explain on attached sheet. Zoning Board Of Appeals C. 1.)Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? No 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? 3.)Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? 4.)If your property contains wetlands or pond areas,have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: - and if issued,please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? No E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting? No Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? Yes If yes,please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: New Single Family Home (BP44406) & Swimming Pool (BP44794) G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking, please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? No If yes,please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. 1. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel Single Family Residence and the proposed use single family residence with accessory garage/pool-house (ex: existing single family,proposed: same with garage,pool or other) Authorized 4fnatuie and Xate ACKNOWLEDGEMENT COPY RECEIVED ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION MAY 10 2018 OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS COTTAGE ON THIRD, LLC RECEIVED Under Section 203 of the Limited Liability Company Law JAN 14 2021 FIRST: The name of the limited liability company is: COTTAGE ON THIRD,LLC Zoning Board Of Appeals SECOND: The county,within this state,in which the office of the limited liability company is to be located is SUFFOLK. THIRD: The Secretary of State is designated as agent of the limited liability company upon whom process against it may be served.The address within or without this state to which the Secretary of State shall mail a copy of any process against the limited liability company served upon him or her is: COTTAGE ON THIRD,LLC 26 REMSEN STREET BROOKLYN,NY 11201 FOURTH: The limited liability company is to be managed by: ONE OR MORE MEMBERS. FIFTH: The existence of the limited liability company shall begin upon filing of these Articles of Organization with the Department of State. SIXTH: The limited liability company shall have a perpetual existence. I certify that I have read the above statements, I am authorized to sign these Articles of Organization, that the above statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and that my signature typed below constitutes my signature. DONALD BRENNAN,ORGANIZER (signature) DONALD BRENNAN , ORGANIZER 26 REMSEN STREET BROOKLYN,NY 11201 Filed by: DOS CORPORATE RECORDS LLC 41 STATE STREET ALBANY,NY 12207 DOS-1239-f-11(Rev.02/12) Page 1 oft � --7q -72L Cottage on Third RECEIVED 850 Third Street, New Suffolk MAY I R 2018 1.000-117.-8-7 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LLC Documentation RECEIVED JAN 14 2021 Zoning Board Of Appeals PON%- 6' MAY 10 2018 PLATINUM FILINGS LLC (MF) ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DRAWDOWN CUSTOMER REF# 231466527 REcEvED JAN 14 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals ACKNOWLEDGEMENT COPY Page 2 of 2 N.Y.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE ' DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS AND STATE RECORDS ALBANY, NY 12231-000 ARE FIVE_ ONLINE FILING RECEIPT ---------- ________MA=—&2018 ENTITY NAME: COTTAGE ON THIRD, LLC ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DOCUMENT TYPE: ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION (DOM. LLC) COUNTY: SUFF FILED.:03/07/2017 DURATION:********** CASH#k:170307010299 FILE#:170307010299 DOS ID:5097604 FILER: EXIST DATE ------ ---------- DOS CORPORATE RECORDS LLC 03/07/2017 41 STATE STREET ALBANY, NY 12207 ADDRESS FOR PROCESS: RECEIVED COTTAGE ON THIRD, LLC 26 REMSEN STREET BROOKLYN, NY 11201 JAN 14 2021 REGISTERED AGENT: ----------------- Zoning Board OfP.ppPals *600 d. oil Ike Y! 'r ■ ri The limited liability company is required to file a Biennial Statement with the Department of State every two years pursuant to Limited Liability Company Law Section 301. Notification that the Biennial Statement is due will only be made via email. Please go to www.email.ebiennial.dos.ny.gov to provide an email address to receive an email notification when the Biennial Statement is due. SERVICE COMPANY: PLATINUM FILINGS LLC-MF SERVICE CODE: MF FEE: 200.00 PAYMENTS 200.00 ---------- -------- FILING: 200.00 CHARGE 0.00 TAX: 0.00 DRAWDOWN 200.00 PLAIN COPY: 0.00 CERT COPY: 0.00 CERT OF EXIST: 0.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 231466527 DOS-1025 (04/2007) Authentication Number: 1703070311 To verify the authenticity of this document you may access the Division of Corporation's Document Authentication Website at http://ecorp.dos.ny.gov BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson, �®� $��,� 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 � ®!® Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. ® a0 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento °��COU SouthoEzoningBoard http://southoldtownny.govZONING BOARD OF APPEALSTO`VVN OF SOUTHOLD eats Tel.(631)765-1809®Fax(631)765-9064 App ECE VED , , FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION of 1.,5q MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 20,2018 01LEP 2 62018 ZBA,FILE: #7193 S thold Town Clerk NAME OF APPLICANT: Donald Brennan, Cottage on Third,LLC PROPERTY LOCATION: 850 Third Street,New Suffolk,NY SCTM: 1000-117-8-7 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was not required to be referred under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23. LWRP DETERMINATION: The relief, permit, or interpretation requested in this application is listed under the Minor Actions exempt list and is not subject to review under Chapter 268. PROPERTY FACTSMESCRIPTION: The subject, 8,420.6 square feet, non-conforming rectangular lot located in the R40 Residential Zoning District measures 100.81 feet fronting on Third Street, with a northern lot line of 86.13 feet shared with a residential neighbor, an eastern lot line of 98.94 feet along a second residential neighbor and a southern lot line of 86.10 feet shared with a third residential neighbor. The site is improved with a two--story, wood frame dwelling with an attached, one-story wood frame enclosed front porch, a one-story wood frame addition to the south, a frame garage and rear wood patio. There is a stone curb asphalt driveway,wood shed and 6 feet high stockade rear fencing along with 4 feet high side fencing, as shown on the survey by Donal A. O'Buckley,Professional Land Surveyor and dated March 27,2017. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for two Variances from Article XXIII, Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's April 19, 2018, Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a building permit to demolish an existing dwelling and to construct a new single family dwelling, accessory pool house and an accessory in-ground swimming pool; at; 1)single family dwelling located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet; 2)proposed improvements more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20% at: 850 Third Street, New Suffolk,NY. SCTM#1000-117-8-7. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to demolish the existing site improvements, totaling 1,658 square feet(19.62% lot coverage) consisting of a single family residence with an attached deck and garage and detached shed, located at the closest point 4.1 feet from the front lot line, where the Code requires such improvements to have a minimum front yard set-back of 35 feet and to build in its place a two-story, single family residence measuring 47.5 feet by 22.5 feet for a total first floor footprint of 1,069 square feet with an attached front I ED -72 Page 2, September 20, 2018 X021 #7193, Cottage on Third LLC—Brennan SCTM No. 1000-117-8-7 eats [zonin:g )ard Of App porch measuring 7 feet by 12 feet for an additional 84 square feet, along with a proposed 16 feet by 32 feet in- ground swimming pool of 512 square feet and a proposed 20 feet by 24 feet garage pool house of 480 square feet, for a total of 2,145 square feet (25.47% lot coverage) where the Code limits such improvements to 20%, necessitating the need for a second, lot coverage,variance. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The applicant's agent provided the addresses of four area residences with less than Code conforming front yard setbacks and five variances in the immediate vicinity for similar relief relative to front yard setbacks or lot coverage for existing structures,and accessory structures,including files: #6708 granted January 23,2014 for front yard setback and garage in partial front yard #3873 granted December 19, 1989 for excessive lot coverage #6462 granted May 18,2011 for excessive lot coverage #6931 granted March 17,2016 for excessive lot coverage and construct garage located in other than rear yard #6270 granted June 16,2009 for front yard setback relief and excessive lot coverage A neighbor spoke during the public hearing against this application citing change in community character and identity. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on September 6,2018 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law _267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variance relative to the front yard setback will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The site is presently developed with a single-family residence built prior to zoning, characteristic of most of the `village grid' of New Suffolk,which contains numerous principal and accessory structures with non-conforming setbacks, due primarily to the small lot sizes and historical development of the area. The applicant proposes to maintain the existing footprint of the residence slated for demolition, however shifting it slightly to the north allowing for widening of the driveway, and placing accessory structures in Code conforming locations. Further reducing the relief requested relative to the front yard setback is a grassy buffer approximately 16 feet wide, owned by the Town of Southold, along the street creating a visual front yard of approximately 20 feet. Grant of the variance relative to lot coverage will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. While New Suffolk is densely developed and many small lots feature a primary residence and accessory structures, few small lots enjoy the benefit of both accessory structures and an inground swimming pool. 2. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant regarding the front yard setback cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The existing residence has a non-conforming front yard setback and any alteration or addition will require a variance. Moreover, the existing residence is old, in a state of disrepair, and built on a poor foundation. It would be too costly for the applicant to completely renovate the existing home and to bring it up to modern standards relative to high wind building codes and modern comfort. The benefit sought by the applicant regarding the lot coverage can be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue,other than an area variance. The applicant can build a smaller house or choose between accessory structures to conform to the Code limitations. 3. Town Law§267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial,representing 88.3% relief from the Code relative to the front yard setback and 27.35% relief from the Code relative to lot coverage. RECEIVED Page 3, September 20, 2018 4�a. #7193, Cottage on Third LLC—Brennan 4 X021SCTM No. 1000-117-8-7 [:JAN rd Of Appeals The proposed structure utilizes the existing footprint with the non-Conforming front yard setback remaining the same. As a result of the overall proposed improvements, excessive lot coverage exists and while the hamlet of New Suffolk is noted for higher density of development relative to lot size, the proposed improvements should be viewed as new construction and more closely mirror current zoning requirements. No residential property of similar lot sizes in the immediate area enjoys the benefit of an accessory garage pool house and in-ground swimming pool with non-conforming lot coverage. Moreover,the applicant failed to provide proof that residential properties in the immediate area on similar lot sizes had received variances that contain both accessory garages and swimming pools with non-conforming lot coverage. 4. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(4) Evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. The proliferation of in- ground swimming pools with accessory pool house/garages on small lots, where lot coverages is exceeded,would change the character of the neighborhood. 5. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(Q. The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6. Town Law_ §267-b. Grant of the requested relief, relative to the front yard setback, is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a 47.5 feet by 22.5 feet, 1,069 square feet footprint, two-story residence with a 7 feet by 12 feet, 84 square feet open air porch while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. Grant of the requested relief, relative to lot coverage for accessory structures including a garage pool house measuring 20 feet by 24,feet and an in-ground pool measuring 16 feet by 32 feet is not the minimum action necessary to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of an accessory structure(s) while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Planamento, seconded by Member Acampora, and duly carried,to GRANT the variance for a front yard setback as applied for, DENT'the variance for excessive lot coverage as applied for, and shown on the survey by Donal A. O'Buckley, Professional Land Surveyor and dated March 27, 2017 and the site plan by West Creek Builders and stamped by John J. Condon,Licensed Professional Engineers and dated March 12,2018 and the construction drawings by West Creek Builders labeled Al —Al l and dated March 27,2018. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible dental by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variances)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. RECEIVED Page 4, September 20,2018 ���� #7193, Cottage on Third LLC—Brennan JAN 4 X029 SCTM No. 1000-117-8-7 Zoning Board of Appeals The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Pursuant to Chapter 280-146(B) of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured, and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three (3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may,upon written request prior to the date of expiration, grant an extension not to exceed three(3) consecutive one (1)year terms. Vote of the Board: Ayes:Members Weisman(Chairperson),Dantes,Acampora,Planamento and Lennert. This Resolution was duly adopted(5-0). 11 N. Leslie Kanes Weisman Chairperson Approved for filing / / -?�4/2018 1 R ECEIVED ' SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP #1000-117-8-7 1_ f ��3 ADDRESS: 850 THIRD STREET, NEW SUFFOLK, NY .4 ���1 RECEIVED OWNER: THIRD STREET COTTAGE, LLC I [Zoning Of Appeals MAY 10 2010 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SITE AREA: 8420.6 SF ; $�+,� � LOT COVERAGE: 1658 SF = 19.62% EXISTING C,S7o 141E , 2145 SF = 25.47% PROPOSEDIL PROPOSED HOUSE = 1069 SF j sEltrlc PROPSpD PATIO PROPOSED COVERED ENTRY PORCH = 84 SFaD '- !-` ON GRADE ,t PROPOSED GARAGE/POOL HOUSE = 480 SF PERVIOUS PAVER., s '• PROPOSED SWIMMING POOL = 512 SF �.- uI �• e egg 1JTIE OF�JC15TlNG , ,STRUCTURE ,� ' rfig► ZONING: R40 W 27 SITE PLAN DATA BASED ON SURVEY BY DONAL A. OBUCKLEY LAND SURVEYOR to x '5 DATED MARCH 27, 2017 STING CD am. rURF! 10' BE R OVER, b I •� i TO_ WEST CREED ~ u�1 �11 z I I DESIGN BUILD REMODEL O -_^EXISTING ze US Kru roeREMOVEDe1 !L I DRAlIVIIVGs• _ I _ ► Ln West Creek Builders,u.o GRASSYBUFFER OP APPROX z47.5' i ! I PO BOX 256 F _ I&FROM EbGE OF ROAD _ N �L© - ' ci,� aT- Xio 4 3'I PAVEMENT To PROPER I 1 New Suffolk,IVY 11956 p Q G LINE INE TY _ -- z I I T 631.734.8416 5E5 � 1 1 PERGIEVED`-+ETSAG r l n I kI 1 t u TO 27.5' ---- ---- 1 REVISIONS/ISSUE: 03.12.19 F Mi 10.7'Lr n p UNEOF STING` G ' O'' 5 UGTURE FTRUGTURE , QUIP. STONE DRIV a• N ' EYRfAY �, TO BE REMOVED PROJECT: - LOCATION MAP _ Cottage on Third,LLC - -" - - - - _ _ N.T.S. — ` - +_ _ _ J 24, 850 Third Street IL '-,n New Suffolk, NY LL N650 EASTING SHED TO BE REMOVED j DRAWNG: ��� Proposed Site Plan N . � •� OS D ITE L PROJECT ORTH rr = SCALE:. 1 1 REVIEWED BY ZBA SEE DECISION # -ItQ3 S1 DATED .t nj FORM NOAJANTOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZOninggeTown Clerk's Office a Southold, N.Y. Certificate Of Occupancy No. . . .?98 9. . . . . . . . Date . . . MarAh .3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 19 .8} THIS CERTIFIES that the building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Location of Property M., Third, Street. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . New. Suffolki .N..X. House No. Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section . . . 11.7. Block . . .Q8 . . . . . . . . .Lot . . . . . OQ7. . . . . . . . Subdivision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Filed Map No. . . . . . . . .Lot No. . . . . . . . . . . . . building built prior to Certificate of Occupancy . . . . .APOA .23. . . . . . , 1957. pursuant to which . . . 29889 . . . . . . . . . . dated . . . . .11"ph .3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 8Q,was issued, mwawa 9meeNXIMThe occupancy for which this certificate is issued is . . . . . . . . . . . Dwelling. . - unfit for.habitation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . The certificate is issued to . . . . . . . .Helen.Aponika. dec . (owner of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval . . . . . . . . .NIR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .N�R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Building Inspector Rov 4no FORM NO.4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JAN7// 7k BUILDING DEPARTMENT ,Office of the Building Inspector Zonin Town Hall 9 Board Board Southold,N.Y_ Certificate Of Occupancy No. .Z 16.259. . . . . . . . . Date . . . .October. 6 : 1987 . . . . . . . . . . THIS CERTIFIES that the building . . . . Aad i r i on . . . . . . . Location of Property . , . $Sa ,Third . sCreet. , New Suffo.1k . Nouse No. Street Ffamler County Tax Map No. 1000 Section .l . . . . . . . .Block . . . . . . . 08. . . . . .Lot . . 0 0 7 , _ , , . , , , ,, Subdivision .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Filed Map No. . . . . . . . .Lot No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated D e c; .1.0 . .1.9.8 5 ptirsuant to which Building Pennit No. .1.4 5 3 3 Z , , , , , . , , , _ _ . dated F :. 7 , . 19 8 6 . : eb , , , was issued,and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law.The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is . . . . . . . . . occupancy, only. (no heat) :. . . . . . . . . . . . . The certificate is issued to . . NICHOLAS r4ANDUSIC , (owner,��"�� ��CXXXIC of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval . . . . . . . . . .V . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .183 2 131 9/ 18/87.. . . PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED: N/A Building Inspector iiev.7181 FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD E BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1-f Office of the Building Inspector JAN � Town Hall Southold, N.Y. peals CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No Z17206 Date AUGUST 18, 1988 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ACCESSORY Location of Property 850 3rd STREET NEW SUFFOLK House No. Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 117 Block 08 Lot 07 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated JULY 20, 1988 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 0172512 dated JULY 20 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy, for which this certificate is issued is ACCESSORY BUILDING AS APPLIED FOR. The certificate is issued to NICHOLAS MANDUSIC (owner, ) of the-aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE. NO. N/A PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED N/A 8dildfng Insp tor e Rev. 1/81 FORM NO. 4 . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �r BUILDING DEPARTMENT aIV ® office of the Building Inspector Southold, .Y.all JAN 4 202, Zoning 80"-d Ofgppoals CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: Z-25799 Date: 06/29/98 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ADDITION Location of Property: 850 THIRD ST NEW SUFFOLK (HOUSE NO.) (STREET) (HAMLET) County Tax Map No. 473889 Section 117 Block 8 Lot 7 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated OCTOBER 7, 1997 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 24494-Z dated NOVEMBER 18, 1997 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is GARAGE ADDITION TO EXISTING ONE FAMILY DWELLING AS APPLIED FOR. The certificate is issued to NICHOLAS J MANDUSIC (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. N456971 06/23/98 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED N/A u ld g Ins ector Rev. 1/81 ( 13EC-EVED AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT --74-7Z JAN fl 4 2021 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Zoning Board Of Appeals WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval, use variance, area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239m and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant: Cottage on Third, LLC 2. Address of Applicant: 26 Remsen Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201 3. Name of Land Owner(if other than Applicant): 4. Address of Land Owner: 5. Description of Proposed Project: Construct new accessory garage/poolhouse 6. Location of Property: (road and Tax map number) 850 Third Street, New Suffolk, NY 11956 1000-117-8-7 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? { } Yes {X} No 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? { } Yes {X}No 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s) of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff, it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office (765-1937) or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use the back of this page if there are additional property owners) 10 / 27 / 2020 Signature of Applicant Date Note: 1. The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2. Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3. Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. 617.20 DECEIVED Appendix B -74-7d, Short Environmental Assessment Form JAN R 4 2021 Instructions for Completing coning Board Of Appeals Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Cottage on Third Residence Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 850 Third Street, New Suffolk, NY 11956 Brief Description of Proposed Action: Construct accessory pool house/garage Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone:917-568-6525 Cottage on Third LLC E-Mail: Address: 26 Remsen Street City/PO: State: Zip Code: Brooklyn NY 11201 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that X may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: X Town of Southold Building Department 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 0.19 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.011 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0.19 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban ❑Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial X Residential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Aquatic ❑ Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 4 4tCC,?UED 1 4 o, 5. Is the proposed action, JAN 14 INNO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? X b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? Zoning Board Of Appeals 1 X 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? X 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: X 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES X b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? X c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? X 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: X 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: X 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: On-Site Septic System X 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? X b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? X b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? X If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: ❑Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland ❑Urban ®Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? X 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES X 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, X a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ®NO❑YES b.Wilbstorm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: 151 NO❑YES Page 2 of 4 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: X 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the to ation of araCcttuc o' NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: X iAN 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the s bye �od�iti �ng�an� r NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? P f If Yes,describe: X I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: Gary Steinfeld,West Creek Builders Date: 10/27/20 Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 RECEIVED 4072, No,or Moderate JAN � � 021 small to large impact impact may may Q Appeals occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the po ."6r-er�si� ,floo mg or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 Board of Zoning Appeals Application 17ECE&ED AUTHORIZATION 4 -7a (Where the Applicant is not the Owner) JAN 14 2021 Zoning Burd Of Appeals I, Donald Brennan for Cottage on Third LLCresiding at 26 Remsen Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201 (Print property owner's name) (Mailing Address) do hereby authorize Gary Steinfeld, West Creek Builders (Agent) to apply for variance(s) on my behalf from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. (Owner's Signature) Donald Brennan, Cottage on Third LLC (Print Owner's Name) i " APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics nrohibits conflicts of interest on the Dart of town officers and emnlovees The nurnose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME : Donald Brennan, Cottage on Third, LLC (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION:(Check all that apply) RECEIVED Tax grievance Building Permit -7c Variance X Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion JAN 14 2021 Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Zoning Board Of Appeals Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer nor employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 27 day of October ,20 20 Signature Print Name Donald Brennan, Cottage on Third, LLC AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees The purpose of this form is to Provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME : Gary Steinfeld, West Creek Builders (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Ewit Tax grievance Building Permit Variance X Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion 1 Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning peals Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a rele-o employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 27 day of October 20 20 Signature Print Name Gary Steinfeld, West Creek Builders RKEIVED Town of Southold I q -7a LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM .IAN 14 2021 A. INSTRUCTIONS Zoning Board Of Appeals 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes",then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to malting a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 117 _ 8 _ 7 The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board © Planning Dept. ® Building Dept. E Board of Trustees 0 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g.capital 0 construction,planning activity,agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit,approval,license,certification: Nature and extent of action: Town of Southold Building Permit for Construction of Accessory Garage/Poolhouse Zoning Board of Appeals-Variance Location of action: 850 Third Street, New Suffolk, NY 11956 Site acreage: 8420.6 SF 0.19 Acres RECi:IVED Present land use: Single Family Residential JAN 11 4 2021 Present zoning classification: R40 Zoning Beard ' peals 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Cottage on Third LLC (b) Mailing address: 26 Remsen Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201 (c) Telephone number:Area Code ( ) 917-568-6525 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No N If yes,which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. [—]Yes ❑ No ' Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable } F Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes 0 No ® Not Applicable RECEIVED -72 Attach additional sheets if necessary ' r Appeals NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages S through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes 0 No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes 0 No ®Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes E No© Not Applicable RECi=IUED Attach additional sheets if necessary Zoning Board Of Appeals Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No © Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ YeF-1 No® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORDING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No © Not Applicable RECLINED Bow Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No© Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes ❑ No © Not Applicable Created on 512510511:20 AM Cottage on Third LLC—850 Third Street, New Suffolk -1000-117-8-7 syw MIMM View South ECEIVED74 -72-, /`f �Z Proposed Garage/Poolhouse Location at Southeast Corner JAN 14 2021 ��u s card Of Appeals r �DPAQ• Stakes Showing Loclati on • Proposed Garage/Poothouse View Southest Proposed Garage/Poolhouse Location at Southeast Corner Cottage on Third LLC,850 Third Street, 10/27/20—Page 1 ti f PROPOSED GARAGE/POOLH - a ,:..: ECEIVED View South JAN �q 72- House, Pool, & Proposed Garage/Poolhouse Location 1 4 2021 Zoning Board OfgpPeals D „y 111 POOLHOUSE View East Driveway Location to Proposed Garage/Poolhouse Cottage on Third LLC,850 Third Street, 10/27/20—Page 2 .r!r � a � i r WEST CREEK PLAN I DESIGN I BUILD RECEIVED Cottage on Third, LLC 7Z 850 Third Street— New Suffolk - 1000-117-8-7 JAN 14 ZOZI Local Properties ZBA Data Zoning 6aard Of Appeals The following properties in both New Suffolk and other areas of the Town of Southold have been approved for lot coverages similar to or above that requested for this application. NEW SUFFOLK PROPERTIES 16500 Main Street (SE Corner Main Street & Fourth Street) — 1000-117-9-13 15,199 SF Lot ZBA#7272, 06/06/2019 Pool &Accessory Buildings Total Lot Coverage 1,662 SF 28.4% 2395 Jackson Street & Second Street— 1000-117-9-25 10,340 SF Lot ZBA#6462, 05/18/2011 Total Lot Coverage 26% 1300 Second Street (SE Corner Second,& Orchard) — 1000-117-7-22 6,060 SF Lot ZBA#3873, 12/19/1989 Total Lot Coverage 1,662 SF 27.4% 865 Second Street (Behind Cottage) — 1000-117-8-10 11,671.9 SF Lot ZBA#6931, 03/17/2016 18x22 Accessory Garage Total Lot Coverage SF 23.07% 1175 First Street (Across from Marina/Has Pool) — 1000-117-7-27 15,281 SF Lot ZBA#6270, 06/16/2009 Lot Coverage Increase 24.3% to 24.8% P.O. BOX 256, NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 TEL 631.334.9205 T ,. I SITE DATA +^� � PROJECT DESCRIPTION 'f p y D�NDrPp �ner— r,J FRPltup` tW1iLSURVEY SGTMN 1000.117.0 7 �w -DEMOLISH EXISTING RESIDENCE AND STORAGE SHED .fi, OftOUNDATIONLO�TlOy NASBEciJAFpgOYED PROPERTY, 050 THIRD STREET CONSTRUCT NEW 24'X 44 5'4 BEDROOM RESIDENCE V4/BASEMENT ' 5 t. NEW SUFFOLK,NY 11996 OWNER THIRD STREET COTTAGE,LLL -SBA VARIANCE FOR NEW HOUSE SETBACKS-APPROVED(07199) ! 4 > APP 0 AS NOTED ZONING: R40 -NEW SANITARY SYSTEM AS PER SGOHS APPROVAL E��jVp BP a -REMOVE ASPHALT DRIVEWAY(S)AND CONSTRUCT NEW PERVIOUS DRIVEWAY TON "c ( SE 1 LOTAR 8 aH TO PM TOR THE : TOTAL LOT AREA 0.42069P 0199 AG EJOSTING NJATER,GAS,ELECTRIC UTILITIES TO BE CONNECTED TO NEW r{�p a yaECT,:Ks STRUCTURE �+Hly �v tx,REaIaED I PROP03eDlATGOVE GE 202l ,,, REp-NOSPL pf 4•PFA1A.iG S P1U513aX1 PROPOSED HOUSE 1,068 SF 6----- w — ; kr-- 4 Y� Zonrrr9 Saar.1 ;� �� _1'W.ETE POF CO TOTAL 1,5809F 18.16% Of APPeals 1.1 55 TE 1�RESPONSIBLE�1rI(W Cts�.N cH=4511=110N ERRORS, SURVEYOR Ry€YaR SITE PLAN BASED ON SURVEY BY; NEW FENCE LOCATION MAP Must provide Manua �,c- COMPLY WITH ALL CODES OF N.T.S. D,J and S as per NATHAN TAFT CORWIN III LAND SURVEYOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL 1986 MAIN ROAD.JAMESPORT,NY 11441 POOL ENCLOSURE MEASURES DURING ,' ANS REQU?p STATE B TOWN CODES NYS Energy Code DATED JANUARY 17,2019 I (4'HIGH) CONSTRUCTION AND CONDRIONS OF All utcnor lighting I�LIMITS OF CLEARING 8 GROUND " j ;a � S�Uita0i0Avg/ Installed,replaced or 86.19' DISTURBANCE 44ppimdchaticonform ELECTRICATION L to erm �- -+�.11�✓ Dlthe7brmCoda w STORM WATER CONTROL ` j _arrs N LF tr�, e j SANITARY 4 6t CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES I SYSTEM M l ��% PROPSED PATIO n• Blower door j •t R,rJ •r e 1)INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES I I 1�' / ON GRAPE ( OCCUPANCY OR DATE r SOIL STOCK and duetwork 2)DEMOLITION OF EXISTING STRUGTURESAND BUILDING COMPONENTS } J J ST P I E AREA ��5 PAVERS USE IS UNLAWFUL testing required.9)EXCAVATION FOR NEW BASEMENT FOUNDATION TO DEPTH OF+I-V to j - / [ + i'` WITHOUT CERTIFICATE TRUSS rLACARDRIO RtEo BELOW FINISHED GRADE LI1 NE OFEIOS NO PLUMBER LEADCONTENT rOr; j ° OF OCCUPANCY 4)CONSTRUCTION OF NEW FOUNDATION AND PORCH STRUCTURES, , 6TIWc Re CERTIFICATE OF NT UPANC IJV ( e ' I 7E t7F OCCUPANL 5)CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESIDENCE Z �( f 1 ((, 4 F pPwNAOe xseccnoHs ule RCOU REO b)NEW SANITARY SYSTEM ANDUTILITI95 W i w ....... .......... _:y ' 1 ` J OWMAOBvroaam °o■Tss,ssa°°tae SUPPLvSYSTE r_4I (7- SOLDER USED 1NWA7ER ED 2/fO noridJL OR Enal�sra CwofHa4on SUPPLY SYSTEM CANM:JT r .. f �,' mntM aI=Vh+bW�:edweoa •' EAU 7)CONSTRUCTION OF NEW SWIMMING POOL AND PATIO W � _ --� '� CA 0)INSTALLATION OF NEW LANDSCAPING PLANTS AND LAWNS AS REQUIRED' QAu i EL21._. a q)REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURESZt 16' rA�1 DARKSNOwNtoA.iO. LL 1� r WEST CREEK 1 STORM WATER ANO POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES: .' - I W E7 IU ^i- 05nNb IC55PODL 1_•_ POL LUt10N MAINTAINED MEASURES BE MNTIdNED tN ACCORDANCE r• ;- ° TO eE"FD CLeAN 9)� w 1 riu a etaw.ol sax sAND sM VqT"TNEPROVIS101tSOF7HETOWNOF50UTHOLD,cHAFTER2Sb.` , ? _ :� ''; I . ' ^"D'EMO D ; i� T PLAN DESIGN BUILD k. MENT AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT, 4T fie' "r W t o { y 18 STORM L"MTER MANAGE „_ STRUGTU J W' O n• --;a o s" I CONTROL"A/EASURES: r TooEREMOVED a , I 9' sroHep46 I�o 92 � JN + rueeaoriwrrNes�NDsr DESIGN DRAWINGS 1)PItOTCGTCxl9T7H6 YE6ETATfON TO ATeAUIN ,%�.- - .p '� ewSnNb WATe$�! + f tt :;' ,JJ'�+y /x I/1( _ �eL�D" iT PLCrA�L„yG WESTGREEK 2 fZE HE LEN y - r, tkL MINtM T LENGTH AND TIME AREAS ARE EXPOSED DUE To ” _ OveRNeAD t - - �4rr� y-- uon ° t einr- swnre.wes'=a POBOX256 CLEARING AND GRADING.STABILIZE ALLAItEA5THATAREGRADEDAND' ELELTRIt uNe 'tIr II 1vri£CO:FtvO STRIPPED WITH TEMPORARY SEEDING. r�OSTING WATFJr�_ EwsnNa H,6�srpOeGTeDGRouuvwwreR NEW SUFFOLK,NY 11956 5)MEAT RUNOFF WATER FROM CLEARED SLOPES AND MINIMIZE LENGTH -"- _ uNE 4x4 a! 140D DECK I TFsr rrai■o usss+aYsomaroot stsaa t AND STEEPNESS. - LINE Orewgni+b'1- -Foee..J TO DEI�yypYep f TEST HOLE DATA N.T.S. 4)INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AT PERIMETER - t -••_•-• -_._ i J I TEST HOLE DUG BY MCDONALD GEOSCIENCE ENGINEER OFDISTURBANGEAREAPR40RTO5TARTOFGOIJSTRUGTIONAND TOEEIiEMWED FENCEI -t--•._ I NOOCIDBER 31, -..- _.1., LONDON ENG NEERING,P.G. MAINTAIN THROUGH PROJECT COMPLETION, TABLLsae ^••• ....--,•_ _ _ c I� OAT-3 _:; ST dIN6AREA 1 1755 51G5BEE ROAD �' ,:...f��' FAN Rom YiAsw -- FOOL 5)MAINTAIN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE E CON TwJDTDN +' �` r Ir eotnr � MATTITUGK,NY 11952 eNrRwcE Dw, PROPOSED b)RETANALL IiUNOFFONSITE AGGO1tDINGTOLOGA REGULATIONS. j (EMSTINSAS Town) I STONEDRIyEyYgY a �� ow I J EROSION&SEnTMENT CONTROL DETAILS 1)CONTROL DUST FROM CONSTRUCTION AGTIVITIE5. 6)CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR REGULAR MAINTENANCE AND j .•- "r m NOT TO SCALE "•""'�••- _ i Jt NEW FENCE '- INSPECTION OF ALL CONTROL MEASURES TO MAINTAIN PROPER I t Jam;^ ..... - - _ ` 1SSUEJ'REVISIONS PERFORMANCE — —,—,— GATE �. SPOOL ENCLOSURE alga .. W '---• — (4'HIGH) OFEaa■q t u -- _•_y%� ;1 PERMIT SET 10.25.19 9)DISPOSE OF ALL SOLID WASTE AND DEBRIS ACCORDING AS 14ELL A5 IL PERMANENT STORM $$° G:� � I eoKiloinrAVA srm ;i + TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS 5TE ACCORDING TO LOCAL REGULATIONS. 45�.— �� oo■tmomemor r"■L1 10)MAINTAIN TEMPORARY FENCING WHERE REQUIRED FOR SAFETY AND 1 ro �t WATER CONTROL O so RE weD— V n+arwoo�ea � MEASURE TO BE REMOVED DEBRIS CONTROL, ? 1 r� PR JE T wTurAwew■a A it)CONTRACTORTOREPORT AMY MODIFICATIONSDETALEQCONTROL GOTTAGE ON THIRD MEASURES. � � � I •1 ■� 850 THIRD STREET no■ NEW SUFFOLK,NY 11955 DRAINAGE SYSTEM GONSTRU�TION NOTES I •uar.r.�r■■n.eaea m6vlovatr:Na4r16r■® SCALE DNAGE SYSTEM GA!GUL�TION& NOTES �z PERMANENT STORM WATER CONTROL 1"-10' ROOF AREA■1,168 OF .EXISTING 1 AND 2 STORY HOUSE,GARAGE,PORCH,AND DECK TO BE REMOVED SITE PLAN, TYPICAL DRYWCLL DRAINAGE RING 1.160 OF X 0.17■199 GF •PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WRH BASEMENT 15 TO SCALE: 1,1 = 101-011 NOT TO SCALE QRAVj1N6 1991421■412 VERTICAL FT.OF V DW LIMACHING POOL REQUIRED Be EXCAVATED AND A CONCRETE FOUNDATION IS PROPOSED PROVIDE(2)0 DIA X5'DEEP DRYY4ELL5 FOR ROOF RUN-0FF DRAIR { SITE PLAN PROPOSED NAGE 17RYHMLS TO BE EXCAVATED DRNEVgAY AREA■1,000 SP -FILL TO Be PINE TO COARSE SAND AS PER TEST 14OLE _ `�:O1 Nfl► I 10005E X 0.17■110 OF -AREA OF GLEARINGJDISTURBANGE■7,500 5F J �omca ddccc. 170142 2■4 VERTICAL FT OF b'DIA LEACHING POOL REQUIRED Np TREES 70 BE REMOVED OUTSIDE OF LIMIT OF CLEARING 8 E i� '°e�x c r4yr m o c u "`�4�'^ ■ ' �` PROVIDE(1)B'DLA.X W DEEP pRYWELL FOR DRIVE~RUN-OFF � , 6ROIJND DISTURBANCE LINE AS SHOWN ao m a o o c+a a as + ' 1 raaaaua�r'cw �5 (ff x J auac4vo�cca f f _ t WEST CREEK PLAN I DESIGN I BUILD RECEIVED RECENT TOWN PROPERTIES j- ) I �' JAN 14 2021 325 Willow Point Road, Southold – 1000-56-5-26 18,217 SF Lot Zoning Board Of Appeals ZBA#7235, 01/17/2019 Total Lot Coverage SF 22.309% 1980 Sigsbee Road, Mattituck– 1000-144-1-15 18,217 SF Lot ZBA#7240, 02/21/2019 Total Lot Coverage SF 27.9% 3605 Camp Mineola Road, Mattituck– 1000-123-6-12.4 18,901 SF Lot ZBA#7296, 07/18/2019 Total Lot Coverage SF 23% 9955 Soundview Avenue, Southold – 1000-59-2-5 6,677 SF Lot ZBA#7300, 10/10/2019 Total Lot Coverage SF 26.2% 1170 Willow Terrace Lane, Orient– 1000-59-2-5 21,435 SF Lot ZBA#7334, 11/21/2019 Total Lot Coverage SF 33.76% 1055 Sound View Road, Orient– 1000-15-3-13 20,874 SF Lot ZBA#7336, 12/19/2019 Total Lot Coverage SF 33.3% 2400 Minnehaha Blvd., Southold – 1000-87-3-58 5,734 SF Lot ZBA#7348, 12/19/2019 Total Lot Coverage SF 34% 840 Marlene Lane, Mattituck– 1000-143-2-20.1 21,750 SF Lot ZBA#7354, 11/21/2019 Total Lot Coverage SF 21.8% P.O. BOX 256, NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 TEL 631.334.9205 ' X(7 7 TOWN OF SO'lJ'1'HO� - O.PER'TY R�E�ORD CARD IJP .J hyo•-O.O,_tom `/ V / .. `•� I . �' 111 OWNER ' STREET 1t :A.CE`'' DISTRICT SUB.! LOQ, /f i&e ei Ael � a FORM OWNER�GA4/�-5 cT N -m E - ACREAGE 0. 190 S �� ' � W �Nd t TYPE OF BUILDING &4->7;1' and uS�'G �o b° RES., jq SEAS. VL. FARM COMM. f IND. Co. I MISC. I Est. Mkt. Value i AND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS es �/� S3 Coni' ado P-acre r AkIW7110at 17 OOC9,0 0 6 (t> 22 0 Q 2, fe& f I - be n0 oariss. b 1 TG S ao ( Z gon 3 400 �o t g$ J/24 9 -co rcz f AGE BUILDING CONDITI V i NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE FRONTAGE ON WATER Farm Acre Value Per Acre Volue FRONTAGE ON ROAD � � � 'J�Ti Ti'- e 1 d BULKHEAD Tillable 2 ® DOCK Tillable, 3 ?,� `�; In 10e4 f�, I coG Woodland C ! �¢ Avo U 'c s & Swampland i� S I aC B,rushland2L."?,/017-:J22-,Rq manazic'ay House Plot ill Tota I i' �„ •^�� fi�r..r^hr K�. FJ .�5,�i`yrT y*!: 1�� Y $r.r,u 2kr a� P'�'..u�} 113, c.fir'.* J+. aAyt r'd,'`"'' r.^e �i•5" F• 1r r h..•r Ya fYa't au -✓. v 7 r M 15 ^�`c ujy S,Ir 'v�' X tarn y8�ai� _rt'Mry �1 M a :.,� r. n t'•j f 5 y W� � „ a�i�� F a7"���5 a��bt�'�( •r Rt` �(k".�,. � itis tS a•r r� q�,j '� k t�v�'+ ry fie f 4, r. �AR� %� `� .7 1�1 � SSC t Sf• 4 K V�1 4'A .. In �';' e;easluyF4a;4 *�x U c r 4^ro• F Jnr ! ccs y ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ CCf fC6pV a �rr �a tiYSra a FKi� d �• 7kd�ti ti.Y 't�4,? 1 1 a h�3ty ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ .ice ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ '_'_"1.�aap.ss—�....r..�.. ` � LYS•' ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ � � t ■■■■It■■I�!■1!�!■"ail■■■■■■ ■■■■IC-9, il■►v9 ■■ I000115911■■■■ I■■■■■■ NNOINIZZINNOWN l■■■■■■ ■■■■■■iriiii■�■■■■■■as Foundation NO IN1B WE■ I; Interior Finish • , v• Fire Place -• I _— / I _ fir_ • RoomsFloor 10 �• • a dry: � i r d� c� September 6, 2018 Regular Meeting CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : We certainly will. Alright so there's a motion to adjourn to the Special Meeting on September 201h. Is there a second? MEMBER LEHNERT : Second. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : All in favor? MEMBER PLANAMENTO : Aye. MEMBER ACAMPORA :Aye. MEMBER DANTES : Aye. MEMBER LEHNERT : Aye. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN :Aye. (See Minutes for Resolution) HEARING#7193— DONALD BRENNAN, COTTAGE ON THIRD, LLC CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : The next application before the Board is for Donald Brennan, Cottage on Third, LLC #7193. This is a request for variances from Article XXIII Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's April 19, 2018 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a building permit to demolish an existing dwelling and to construct a new single family dwelling, accessory pool house and an accessory in-ground swimming pool at 1) single family dwelling located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet, 2) proposed improvements more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20% located at 850 Third St. in New Suffolk. Is there someone here to represent this application? GARY STEINFELD : Gary Steinfeld, West Creek Builders 385 Grathwohl Rd. in New Suffolk representing the owner of the property. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Okay so this looks like a front yard setback as proposed at 4.1 feet from the property line where the code requires 35 feet and lot coverage of 25.4% where the code permits a maximum of 20% is that correct? GARY STEINFELD :That's correct. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : What would you like us to know? September 6, 2018 Regular Meeting GARY STEINFELD : We're essentially building rebuilding on the existing footprint so there's an existing single family residence on the same footprint that we're proposing other than a move of about two feet north to provide better access to the garage. There's currently a 10 by 20 shed structure located in the same area that we're proposing the new garage. As everyone is very familiar with this area in New Suffolk we're faced with small lots sizes there. This particular lot being 8,420 sq. ft. The front yard setbacks and the lot coverage issue is a very familiar situation with this area.Most of the houses in that area are on a reduced front yard setback if we take a look around that neighborhood. Also we're dealing with a lot of scenarios where we have a higher than a 20% lot coverage in that are also. The 4.1 foot setback that's being requested now is the same as the existing and that pertains to a 4.1 feet to a covered front porch. In the existing building right now it is a fully enclosed 7 by 18 porch area. That's now being reduced to 7 by 12 and it will be in an open format deck and roof above. The setback to the main house structure is significantly larger as you will see on the site plan that we submitted. Also a unique part of a lot of properties in this are in New Suffolk and this one in particular so we're anywhere from 11 feet to 12 feet on the setback to the main structure but as you probably noticed from your site visit there's about a 15 to 16 foot grassy buffer on the edge of the actual roadway to the property line so even with a non-conforming 4.1 and around a 10 to 12 feet to the main structure the proceed setback on how it matches into the character of the area is significantly larger than that although we are actually dealing with the exact code numbers here. The pool house and garage and the proposed swimming pool these are all customary accessories for the town and this neighborhood in particular. Both those structures will be sited on the land in a conforming location with a rear yard and conforming setbacks.The pool will be on grade so it's well screened by the house and the garage position. The garage is in a position where a existing structure slightly smaller than it existed so we're not changing in particular to the character of the area with the addition of that structure. If you walk around the neighborhood and I can provide you a list, there are numerous parcels that are over the 20% lot coverage and numerous parcels that have a less than the mandated front yard setback. So looking at that in whole I think that you know we believe the site plan that we proposed to the Board conforms very well with the character in this particular neighborhood and is not asking for any additional uses that are not customary being a garage, pool house and a swimming pool. If we just take a quick look around that neighborhood this house on 780 King St. that has under a 6 foot front yard setback, 1300 Second St. has a 27.4% lot coverage, 2395 Jackson St. which is on the corner of Jackson and then Second St. has a 26% lot coverage. All these that I'm speaking to you right now were offered variances to get to those coverages. 1175 First St. has a 24.8% lot coverage and then we can just continue on and find examples of that you know throughout this grid of New Suffolk which is kind of laid out a grid with houses close to the front yard. There's also numerous examples of existing structures that predate the code that are sitting close to the lot lines and have high coverages. The ones I mentioned are 4:1 September 6,2018 Regular Meeting the ones that went through the variance process with your Board. I'll give you for a record the copies of those. So I can answer any questions or talk to you about your thoughts. We were careful to stay with the footprint of the existing house. From the point of view of character you know the only thing that's really being added to the property is the swimming pool. I mean obviously we're going on lot coverage but you know when you look at the nature of the structures on the property the garage is going exactly where the existing storage building is and the house is going exactly where the existing house is other than it'll just have a little larger presence due to the full second floor versus a partial that's there now and we tried our best to reduce the size of the structures that would be at the 4.1 setback from the property line. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : So the existing front yard setback is 4.1 and you're maintaining that? GARY STEINFELD : We're maintaining that so we're not changing that and we're trying to reduce that volume of that portion of the structure that's 4.1, the 7 by 18 structure that's now is a fully enclosed room. We're really just looking at a front stoop that's covered from the weather so it'll have a much more open feel up to the main portion of the house. When you try to design something in that neighborhood you're trying to stay within the character and you know the house is still a modest sized house. It's under 2,000 square feet the proposed house it's just four bedrooms. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN :Just four bedrooms. GARY STEINFELD : Well in today's day and age with children four bedrooms is CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : No I get it, I'm just saying it's a strange thing to be living in a situation where a four bedroom four bathroom house is now considered modest for the North Fork. GARY STEINFELD : I understand, I live in a 1,700 sq. ft. house and people look at me like I'm crazy with two kids in that but :record HAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Well we're all obviously very familiar with the area. It's helpful at you submitted the priors you know some priors for variance relief and so on. Just the sake is there any way you can reduce the proposed lot coverage? GARY STEINFELD : I mean we could reduce you know it also it kind of has to do with the feeling of the Board. I mean are we just doing that to meet numbers for precedent you know so we can definitely you know I think two things. I look at code and I look at character of the neighborhood and then you know I guess we can't only look at character of the neighborhood because the code has to not create precedent of you know going over larger numbers so if I was to look at his property and see what they can reduce we could certainly reduce the size of 42 September 6, 2018 Regular Meeting the front porch which at its size right now is being included in buildable area correct, so if we went down to 5 by 6 on that porch which would be 30 sq. ft. or less it would not be include in the buildable area. So we could reduce that which would probably bring our coverage down to I did make some notes we could reduce lot coverage down by you know I'm bringing it down to a 5 by 6 to a 24.83 MEMBER DANTES :That's a covered porch though isn't it? GARY STEINFELD :That's a covered porch but we could MEMBER DANTES : I think covered porches are always calculated. GARY STEINFELD : I think we'd have to get an interpretation on that but I don't know if the owner would be against taking the coverage off it. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Well I have to ask (inaudible) on the record cause I'm sure you know we have to grant when justified the minimal variance possible. So we're just looking to see if there's GARY STEINFELD : That's a definite, we can reduce that size to minimize it. They would like to include the roof on there so we can look into the (inaudible) of that. I'm very familiar with the code and you know the code doesn't seem to be specific on that. I mean there are cornices and things of that nature that can protrude 28 to 30 inches into the zone so I'm open to the Board with that if you feel strongly about no roof being over that step it can be. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : You know what's not on here there's no drywell for pool de- watering on your proposed site plan. GARY STEINFELD : We will fully be you know maintaining to the code. we're putting in a new sanitary system all new drywells. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : I saw that in the side yard but GARY STEINFELD : Yeah it's not on the site plan but we'll be doing that for the house structure itself for the pool and stone driveway as required. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Well looks like your proposed garage and pool house is pretty small. GARY STEINFELD : I tried to keep that as small as possible. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : It's only a one car garage and it's pretty small. GARY STEINFELD :And it's pretty tight. He has pickup truck that he stores over the summer. 4,31 September 6,2018 Regular Meeting CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : A 16 by 32 foot pool is pretty standard on a smaller side so I just wanted to see what well alright anything from the Board? GARY STEINFELD : I mean if the Board feel strongly that we're pushing the limit too much we can try to do something else but I don't think CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Well we'll take a look at the prior variances and you know compare them to what you're proposing for lot coverage. GARY STEINFELD : We tried to match up what other things were going on in the neighborhood you know swimming pool sized that were similar in the area, garages that were similar or smaller. You know there's a couple of other houses around the corner that you know did some new pool house garages that we tried to stay kind of within that character in that size also. I don't think we'd be reducing that garage size would be pretty difficult at this point. It would barely fit in the pickup truck. MEMBER PLANAMENTO : So you spoke a lot of the character of the neighborhood in New Suffolk specifically which is sort of a well small scale, smaller housing stock sort of environment. The massing of this house in my opinion when you look at it from the street fagade in its current condition sort of fits in to the community. Granted it's an older tired home in need of updating but the new fagade is really quite substantial. It's a full two stories, it runs the width of the lot, why are you not renovating the existing house and maintaining its charm versus demolition and building a new home. GARY STEINFELD : A couple of reasons, one the client would like to get a basement in the house, two about two thirds of the existing foundation is not up to standard building codes. If we go to put a second story on it there's a deteriorated crawl space area and there's mixed in rubble and brick on a good portion of the foundation there. So to reuse that and build we'd have to tear down most of the house anyway to rebuild that portion of it. MEMBER PLANAMENTO : And you couldn't elevate the house and work underneath it? GARY STEINFELD : Part of the house also was a garage structure now so I mean we did look at that cause the client is under a tighter budget to you know get a new structure up but it gets to the point it just doesn't make sense to renovate that. They'd still be looking to do the same mass to get an expansion of that second floor over the garage area anyway so I still think the fagade would still you know come across at that level. There are a number not a lot but there are some traditional colonial style you know two story facades in that New Suffolk area especially down New Suffolk Ave. that have that two story presence you know within right on the sidewalk which is in a couple of feet of the setbacks so it's not completely out of the character of the area to have that two story fagade. We're challenged here with an 8,400 sq. ft. 4,41 September 6,2018 Regular Meeting lot. It's just you know I would have loved to get a little you know if you could of got less of a full length house on that front yard you know it would be interesting to explore but on an 8,400 sq. ft. lot you're really very limited. MEMBER PLANAMENTO : I understand there's limitations and also because this is a demolition why aren't you pulling the house back a bit? GARY STEINFELD : Because we're trying to get a swimming pool in the rear yard also and a garage in the rear yard. MEMBER PLANAMENTO : When you look at the scale of the lot the back yard space and we're not dealing with a large (inaudible) GARY STEINFELD : If you look at it now the house right now is you know less than 20 feet from the garage which doesn't really give you much room to you know if the code speaks of this town isn't strict about it but the code even speaks of keeping 20 feet between accessory structures and a house. It's in the zoning code so we're you know we're tight on that right now. The garage is sitting right on the lot line so there's really no option to slide that back further. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Well the dwelling began as a seasonal unheated cottage thus the name I guess. GARY STEINFELD : Exactly. So that answers your question. There's really we don't have the depth of lot there to get that. If you look at the lot on the survey it's not much 85, 86 feet. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Is there anyone else in the audience wanting to address the application?Sure please come forward just take the podium and state your name for the record please. FRANK CASTELLANO : Frank Castellano 1275 First St. New Suffolk. This doesn't affect me directly but everybody talks about the character of New Suffolk. They build higher and higher and it affects neighbors drastically; they lose their privacy. Everybody knows New Suffolk and the building that's been going on there is quite crazy over the last couple of years and I don't understand why people buy pieces of property knowing there's limitations and then everybody wants to exaggerate it or go further. The character of New Suffolk is being lost period. I see it going on all the time. Everybody is pushing the envelope. Now granted I know there's non- conformity in New Suffolk. A lot of houses are close to the street. Those are the old ways yes, keep it that way. I'm not saying change it but all these variances within New Suffolk is quite crazy, you mentioned it. They build and they build to the point where New Suffolk is getting to be like almost like skyscrapers to the point. Everyone knows this. I'm sick of really seeing the character lost in New Suffolk and it's just getting worse and worse and this is not against him or 451 September 6, 2018 Regular Meeting J the people and it doesn't affect me directly but when I walk my dog it's just not the same anymore after buying my house twenty five years ago. Like I say everybody goes higher and higher and then the next person goes higher because they want their privacy and before you know it you know I don't know what else to say. I said to myself I'm not going to say anything I just came to hear but I just want to say that this nonsense that everything is in the character of New Suffolk is total nonsense. It's everybody is just doing as much as they can and I agree with you why if you're going to build you know build take the structure and just rebuild it and stay within the code. Okay you're five feet from the front line so that's acceptable in New Suffolk but not more and more and more because they are small plots in New Suffolk. I have one of the bigger plots but still they are small and I know that and I knew that when I bought the house twenty five years ago. There might be traffic because I'm on the corner but it's getting out of hand and that's all I wanted to say thank you. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN :Anyone else, anything more from the Board? GARY STEINFELD : Just I want to reiterate that from the edge of the street from the pavement this house is going to be at 27 %Z feet and the front porch will be 20% feet so I just in all this talk of 4.1 setbacks I just want everybody to understand and I know you guys have been out to the site that we do have those distances on this small lot from the roadway just at a nature of the wide grassy area that's within the town right of way so we're not looking at a house when you're walking on the street, walking a dog four feet, five feet, six feet or even seven feet from the roadway. We're talking at a house that's set back almost 30 feet from the pavement at 27 feet and that small front porch that we're proposing is setback over 20 feet from the road pavement and again the house we're not looking at a large house here. It's less than 24 feet wide or 22 feet wide and it's less than 2,000 sq. ft. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : I make a motion to close the hearing reserve decision to a later date is there a second? MEMBER ACAMPORA :Second. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : All in favor? MEMBER LEHNERT : Aye. MEMBER PLANAMENTO : Aye. MEMBER DANTES : Aye. MEMBER ACAMPORA :Aye. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN :Aye. WEST CREEK PLAN I DESIGN I BUILD RECEIVED October 27, 2020 JAN�4,7 2- 4 2021 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals zoning Bcard ofq 54375 Main Road, PO Box 1179 - Ppeals Southold, NY 11971 RCCEIilEp RE: SCTM #1000-117-8-7 JANE Cottage On Third LLC 850 Third Street, New Suffolk, NY 11956 Zoning_goaa=ofA Application to Southold Town Board of Appeals Area Variance - Ppeals Dear Zoning Board of Appeals, Please find enclosed One (1) original and Eight (8) copies of an application package for a Zoning Board of Appeals Area Variance for 850 Third Street, New Suffolk, NY. The following items are included: 1. Building Department Notice of Disapproval Dated October 26, 2020 2. Area Variance Application 3. Project Description Form 4. Questionnaire—ZBA Application 5. Previous Granted ZBA Variance #7193 6. Current Building Permit Site Plan BP#44406 7. Previous Certificates of Occupancy 8. AG Data Form 9. Short EAF Form 10.Owner's Consent 11.Transactional Disclosure Forms — Owner & Agent 12.LWRP Form 13.Site Photos 14.Site Plan 15.Current Survey 16.Building Plans — Proposed Accessory Garage/Poolhouse 17.Town Property Card 18.List of Comparative Properties Granted Area Variances 19.$500 Application Fee If you require additional information or have any questions, please contact me at 631-334-9205 or garyOD-westcreekbuilders.com. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Sincerel Gary S d West Creek Builders, LLC Agent for Applicant P.O. BOX 256, NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 TEL 631.334.9205 Ala ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE,MMC ��® l/y Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK ® P.O.Box 1179 C Z Southold,New York 11971 REGISTRAROF VITAL STATISTICS p • Fax(631)765-6145 MARRIAGE OFFICERy �► RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER �o,` ��O Telephone 765-1800 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER www.southoldtldtownny.gov OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Elizabeth A.Neville DATED: January 19, 2021 RE: Zoning Appeal No. 7472 Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeals No. 7472 West Creek Builders, LLC for Cottage on Third LLC: �Notice(s) of Disapproval The Application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Applicant's Project Description _Questionnaire Correspondence- Certificate(s) of Occupancy Building Permit(s) Misc. Building Dept. forms (Certificate of Compliance, Housing Code Inspection, etc.) _,,/Misc. Paperwork- C � Copy of Deed(s) Findings, Deliberations and Determination Meeting(s) Agricultural Data Statement _Short Environmental Assessment Form _Board of Zoning Appeals Application Authorization Action of the Board of Appeals Applicant/Owner Transactional Disclosure Form(s) ,/Agent/Representative Transactional Disclosure Form(s) —/LWRP Consistency Assessment Form ,,/ Photos Property Record Card(s) Maps- JJ Survey/Site Plan %/ Drawings Town of Southold P O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 01/19/21 Receipt#: 277470 Quantity Transactions Reference Subtotal 1 ZBA Application Fees 7472 $500.00 Total Paid: $50000 Notes: 117.-8-7(Cottage on Third LLC) Payment Type Amount Paid By CK#5091 $500.00 West, Creek Builders Inc Southold Town Clerk's Office 53095 Main Road, PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Name: West, Creek Builders Inc P O Box 256 New Suffolk, NY 11956 Clerk ID: JENNIFER Internal ID•7472 J Westermann, Donna From: Westermann, Donna Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 11:10 AM To: Eric Dantes; Leslie Kanes Weisman; Nicholas Planamento; Patricia Acampora; Robert Lehnert Cc: Fuentes, Kim Subject: 7472-Cottage on Third - comps Attachments: #7472-Cottage on Third comps.pdf Good morning, Eric-please see attached comps for file#7472 Cottage on Third LLC. Thank you, Donna Donna Westermann Zoning Board of Appeals Town Annex/First Floor 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 (631) 765-1809 i BEST CREEK PLAN I DESIGN I BUILD March 8, 2021 RECEIVED Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road, PO Box 1179 MAR 10 Z021 Southold, NY 11971 [zog Board Of Appeals RE: SCTM #1000-117-8-7 Cottage On Third LLC 850 Third Street, New Suffolk, NY 11956 Application to Southold Town Board of Appeals Area Variance #7472 Dear Zoning Board of Appeals, Thank you for the opportunity to discuss the application for 850 Third Street (#7472) at the March 4, 2021 Hearing. As per the Board's request, I am attaching additional information for comparable properties in the New Suffolk area that were granted lot coverage variances as well as a summary of applicable information. I had also requested from the Town Attorney Via email clarification on areas of the Town Law/Code referencing the different rights afforded the property Owner of 850 Third Street stated by the board as new construction vs. other owners of nearby properties that are not considered new construction. That request is being made in duplicate via this letter as well. Enclosed: 1. Summary Points of Variance Request 2. ZBA#6931 Cover and Decision — 865 Second Street 3. ZBA#7272 Cover and Decision — 16500 Main Road 4. ZBA #6270 Cover and Decision — 1175 First Street 5. ZBA#6020 & 6127 Cover and Decisions — 735 Jackson Street 6. ZBA#7392 Cover and Decision — 1175 Second Street 7. ZBA#6773 Cover and Decision — 1200 First Street 8. ZBA#6595 Cover and Decision — 1060 Second Street 9. ZBA#6462 Cover and Decision —2395 Jackson Street If you require additional information or have any questions, please contact me at 631-334-9205 or garypa westcreekbuilders.com. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Sincerely, 55: Gary St Zeld West Creek Builders, LLC Agent for Applicant cc: Bill Duffy— Southold Town Attorney P.O BOX 256, NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 TEL 631.334.9205 =WESTREEK RECEIVED PLAN I DESIGN I BUILD MAR 10 2021 Cottage On Third #7472 Zoning Board Of Appeals 850 Third Street, New Suffolk, 1000-117-8-7 Summary of Variance Request 1. Requested variance of 22.91% lot coverage is comparable to variances granted by the Board for other nearby properties as supported by the requested and submitted background material (e.g. #6931, #7272, #6270, #6020, #7392, #6773, #6595, #6462). 2. The requested garage/pool house is located in the rear yard, meets code required rear and side yard setbacks and is 56.1' from the front lot line and 79.1' from the edge of the street pavement. 3. The property has a 16' area of grass remaining from the front lot line to the edge of street pavement that functionally operates as the applicant's front yard increasing the public perception of the front yard setbacks as well as the distance the proposed garage/pool house is situated from the road. This train of thought has been referenced in other variance grants for larger than code approved lot coverage (e.g. #6595). The house sits 25.6' from the road at its nearest point; uncovered 4' x 7.5' porch is set back 21.6'. 4. The neighboring property sharing the rear lot line, 865 Second Street, was granted a variance for 23.07% lot coverage (ZBA#6931) for the new construction of an 18' x 22' garage located in the property's front yard. Minutes of the public hearing for#6931 state that the property already had a garage which was to be converted to living space to meet the Owners wishes of a larger home. The applicant for#7472 should be afforded the same rights to have a home that meets the size requirement for their family as well as a garage. Cottage on Third is requesting less relief with a variance for a smaller 15.5' x 22.5' structure and total lot coverage of 22.91% 5. This variance request is about lot coverage and how it compares to other variances granted in the area not whether the structure is a garage, garage/pool house, pool, or if construction is new or alteration/additions; this train of thought has been stated by the Board in other hearings resulting in granting of larger than code approved lot coverage. As a comparison and example, 16500 Main Road was granted a variance (#7272) for 28.4% lot coverage with the installation of a swimming pool on a property already over 20% lot coverage and now enjoys the benefit of both accessory structures and an in ground swimming pool. 735 Jackson Street similarly was approved for a lot coverage variance (#6020/#6127) with an in ground pool and accessory structure(s). Based on these and other comparable properties, the granting of the variance request will not produce an undesirable change in the existing character of the neighborhood. PAGE 1 OF 2 P.O. BOX 256, NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 TEL 631.334.9205 WEST CREEK PLAN I DESIGN I BUILD 6. The existing house has a significantly larger set back from the front lot line (10.8') than the previous house (4.1') which was demolished to allow for a financially feasible expansion of living space. Do to the poor foundation and older structure it was not prudent from a cost or engineering perspective to expand upon the structure. The new house also has a smaller foot print that the previous home. 7. The property is located in the `Village Grid' of New Suffolk which contains numerous properties with multiple accessory structures and with lot coverages over the code approved 20%. _ 8. The `modified' salt box architectural style of the existing house is in line with traditional homes on the east end of Long Island. Red cedar shingle siding has also been historically used throughout the area. Landscaping and plantings will be installed this coming spring to complete the site work. PAGE 2OF2 P 0. BOX 256, NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 TEL 631.334.9205 RECEIVED ZBA#6931 MAR 10 2021 865 Second Street, New Suffolk 1000-117-8-10 zoning Board of Appeals Variance was granted for 23.07% Lot Coverage for the new construction of an 18' x 22' Accessory Garage and alterations to existing home. NOTES: This property directly abuts 850 Third Street sharing a rear property line. The 850 Third Street variance request (#7472) is for 22.91% Lot Coverage for the new construction of a 15.5'x 22.5'Accessory garage/pool house. 865 Second Street was granted variance for 23.07°6 Lot Coverage for the construction of a larger 18' x 22'garage located closer to the street in the front yard. This property already had an attached garage but as recorded in the 3/3/2016 Hearing minutes, the Owner wanted additional living space. The granted structure was also referred to as being a small garage. The Owner of 850 Third Street, should be afforded the some rights to have the current amount of living space that fits their family size as well as a detached garage as applied for with a lower lot coverage as compared to the adjacent property of 865 Second Street. �r BOARD MEMBERS.- Southold Town Hall OF'S®UI' Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �� y® 53095 Main Road®P.O.Box 1179 _ �® �� Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantes Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Homing e ® �� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider, ��MUM,� -Southold,NY 11971 hit :/Isoutholdtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS !ARP22 2016 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1509®Fax(631)765-9064 Q. 6uthold Town Clerk FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETtRMI NATION MEETING OF MARCH 17,2016 ' ZBA FILE#6931 NAME OF APPLICANT:Michelle Roussan PROPERTY LOCATION: 865 Second Street,New Suffolk,NY SCTM#1000-117-8-10 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. ' LWRP DETERMINATION: The relief, permit, or interpretation requested in this application is listed under the Minor Actions exempt list and is not subject to review under Chapter 268. PROPERTY FACTSMESCRIPTION: Applicants parcel is non-conforming,consisting of 11,671.9 sq.ft.in a R40 residential district. The parcel has 98.92 feet on Second Street, 118 feet on the north property line, 98.94 feet on the westerly property line, and 118 feet on the south property Iine. It is improved with a one story frame ranch type dwelling with an attached two car garage. Shown on a site plan prepared by Thomas Samuels,Architect, dated January 27,2016. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article III Section 280-15 and Article XXIII Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's January 20, 2016 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a building permit to construct an accessory garage at: 1) proposed in location other than the code required rear yard, 21 lot coverage proposed at more than the code maximum allowed of 20%. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to locate a proposed accessory two car garage, in the front yard at a conforming front yard setback where the code requires a rear yard location,and lot coverage of 23.07%,where the code permits a maximum of 20%. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The applicant proposes to convert the space in the existing attached two car garage into habitable space,and to construct a new 18 ft.x 22 ft.accessory 1 '/a car garage. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on March 3,266 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: Page 2 oN--March 17,2016 ZBA#693I—Roussan SCTM#1000-117-8-10 1. Town]Law 4267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The subject parcel is similar in size and non-conformity to other nearby parcels. The present home takes up much of the width of this very wide parcel. The mature trees and plantings on the subject property will effectively screen the proposed accessory garage from view. 2. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Because of the existing location of the dwelling the applicant simply has no conforming rear yard and therefore can only place an accessory garage in the front yard area in a location adjacent to the existing driveway. 3. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial, representing 100% relief from the code for the front yard location and 15.4% for excessive lot coverage. However, the proposed accessory garage will be well screened from the road and neighboring properties by existing mature landscaping and the minimal size of the proposed accessory structure which is only 306 sq.ft. and 12 feet high. 4. Town Law $267-b(3)(b)(4) No Evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. 5. _Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(S1. The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6. Town Law 4267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a new 18' by 22' accessory garage in the front yard area while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Goehringer, seconded by Member Weisman (Chairperson), and duly carried,to GRANT the variance as applied for, and shown on the site plan prepared by Samuels and Steelman Architects and dated January 16,2016. Subject to the following condition; CONDITION: 1. The accessory garage shall only be used for storage. That the above condition be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Pursuant to Chapter 280-146(B) of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured, and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County CIerk,within three Page 3 of 3—March 17,2016 ZBA#6931—Roussan scrM#1000-117-8-10 (3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may,upon written request prior to the date of expiration,grant an extension not to exceed three(3) consecutive one (1)year terms. Vote of the Board.• Ayes: Members Weisman (Chairperson), Dantes, Horning, Goehringer, Schneider. This Resolution was duly adopted(5-0). Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson Approved for filing ,3 /al /2016 4 � V LOCATION MAP �,\�� OEOgOERp SITE DATA EECONIC\`M SCTM# 1000-117-08-10 \\ �P PROPERTY: 865 2nd Street No New SuHalk,NY 11956 � .\��•`��� �\��•• OWNER: Michelle Rouesan \� PBox 246 e ■■ ■ � � RONA De ��\•, New Suffolk,NY 11959 I,I,1 J� Tel.#6315215376 A O _ ❑❑P e �'\ Y SITE: 11,671.9 SQ.FT.=0.267 AC. _ ll Q \ ®®® ❑® \\ AREAgEpkll� MIrIN 0 N LOT EXISTING:2,297 SF-19.88% O I 1 ��\ kg-'\ ALLOWABLE 20%COVERAGE: uj NEW SUFFOLK AVE. ❑, 11 l❑ PROPOSED:2,893 SF•23.07% � �Ac PROPOSED INCREASE:396 SF-3.39% ZONING: R-40 z SURVEYOR: Roderick VanTuyl Greenport,NY 91944 Dated:Se f 7,1979 Lu LOT COVERAGE TABLE W NORTH/SOUTH ELEVATIONS EAST ELEVATION SITE AREA TOTAL. Iib92 sf w SCALE:1/4"=1' !4"-0" SCALE:9 =1'-0" STRUCTURES EXI9TIN6 PERCENTAGE PROPOSED PERCENTAGE HOUSE: 2,299 sf 19.65% 2"299 sf 19.68% Lu � Y.1 6ARASE: O sf 0% 39b of 5.59% YYY�ddd TOTAL: 2,299 sf 19.68% 2,695 sf 25.09% j L 22'-0" Q v v LL (p m ZO n w/J Lu 5 85.40'00" E — — — L� Z 35' e REAR YARD m SEMACK FMm ❑ R 5` f7k I ___ 1-1/2 CAR I EXISTING DRIVEWAY -a 2• ggg _ y a' p GARAGE p - I v Y GQUf?TYARD rI _ WEST ELEVATION � �W• �g SCALE:1/4"=1'-V I > EXIST O=R (a V)• NSAFLOOR PLAN - GARAGE ALrKAY a o E�Z`I�-:t yk• EXISTING STONE yr TERRACE 55'-0" PROJECT NO: 1517 FRONT YARD 5E76ACK I DRAWN UT 2 r • ? ? x J BY: TS FINAL MAP c D REVIEWED BY I Zn�B1A DATE: 1/27/16 SEE DETION#ti2� 3 sc ' As NOTED �, o DATED_1 rl 1 a-0IY $ F2E OVE EX IN6 Z �y — y SHEETTffLE: O RHEAD OR IDE vp suDIN POOR _ — _ - — 10202• SITE PLAN - --- ----- N 85'45'00"W N 66'40'00'W FLOOR PLAN f 5.s6' ELEVATIONS EAST ELEVATION - HOUSE pip ^ ^p10�31 0 T E P L np,,wry " E SHEET NO: SCALE:1/4"=T-0" SC G'V� Cl �A"2.91 8 SCALE:1"=10-'-O" 20HLNG BOPRO OF Fo p ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS RECEIVED MAR 10 2021 ZBA#7272 16500 Main Road, New Suffolk zoning D°ara Of/appeals 1000-117-9-13 Variance granted for 28.4% Lot Coverage for construction of in-ground swimming pool. NOTES: Meeting minutes of 5/9/2019 hearing reflect Chairperson stating that there are a number of other properties in New Suffolk near the property that were granted similar lot coverage variances. Chairperson also states regarding gathering information about previous variances granted that 'It's just a matter of giving for our record giving us background that we can enter into the decision about comparable lot excessive lot coverage in that area. It doesn't have to be a swimming pool. You could look at other pools but it's really about the size of the lot and the lot coverage cause that's what is before us. The requested Variance for 850 Third Street (#7472) if for a much lower lot coverage of 22.91%. ZBA #7272 and other comparable variances submitted for the Boards review should suffice to meet the Chairpersons need for proper background to substantiate the decision. Again, the Owner of 850 Third Street should be afforded the same rights of other properties in New Suffolk that have been granted lot coverage variances. BOARD MEMBERS ®���F S®(/ryD� Southold Town Ball Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson O 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 [ t Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Q Office Location: Eric Dantes • �O Town Annex/Fast Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. ly 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue Nicholas Planamento C�U{ '� Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov pREC E I VE D ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS a ��� 't 3:LIOAm TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JUN 1 2019 Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 a So h01'd'T®wn Clerk ]FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JUNE 6,2019 ZBA FILE:#7272 NAME OF APPLICANT: Whitecap North Fork LLC PROPERTY LOCATION: 16500 Main Street,New Suffolk NY SCTM: 1000-117-9-13 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions,without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was not required to be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23. LWRP DETERMINATION: The relief, permit, or interpretation requested in this application is listed under the Minor Actions exempt list and is not subject to review under Chapter 268. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The subject, non-conforming 15,199 square feet, .349 acre, rectangular parcel located in the R40 residential Zoning District measures 100 feet along Main Street,then runs south 151.97 feet along Fourth Street, then west 100 feet along a residentially developed lot, then north 152.03 feet along a second residentially developed lot. The site is improved with a two-story wood frame house with roofed porches, concrete and brick patios, a raised wood patio, and a two-story wood frame cottage with a small porch, concrete, slate and brick patios and a bilco cellar entrance, The property is fully fenced as shown on the survey prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin,III Land Surveyor, last revised March 14,2019. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for a Variance under Article XXIII, Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's December 6,2018 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct an accessory in-ground swimming pool, at; 1) more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%; at: 16500 Main Street,New Suffolk,NY.SCTM#1000-117-9-13. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a variance to install an accessory inground swimming pool measuring 14 feet by 30 feet for an additional 420 square feet, yielding a new lot coverage of 28.4% where the Code limits such improvements to a maximum of 20%. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: No member of the public or an immediate neighbor spoke in favor of or against this application. The original Notice of Disapproval written December 6, 2018 was Renewed March 18, 2019 and was Amended March 18, 2019 to reflect the revised survey last dated March 14, 2019 after it was discovered that utility lines including natural street gas,water and electric were buried at the original location of the proposed pool, V 3 3 Page 2,June 6,2019 #7272,Whitecap North Fork,LLC SCTM No. 1000-117-9-13 for service between the primary residence and the accessory structure. The site was developed prior to zoning and was previously used first as a boarding house/hotel and then later as a five-family residence. A pre-Certificate of Occupancy was offered as part of the application, along with multiple Certificates of Occupancy for other site improvements to the primary and accessory structure, which remains a seasonal two-unit residence. Prior Zoning Board of Appeals decision 95962 was issued November 9,2006 converting the primary residence from three rental units to two. Under Certificate of Occupancy #39406, issued December 14, 2017, the applicant converted the primary residence with two rental apartments to a single-family dwelling. The residence and accessory structure are visible reminders of the history, architecture and scale of the hamlet of New Suffolk. The applicant's agent indicated willingness to remove a small, ten feet by ten feet square, wooden platform abutting the proposed location of the pool, not counted in lot coverage. The agent stated that pool equipment will be located behind the primary residence, as shown on the survey, in a sound-deadening enclosure and that a dry well for pool dewatering will be installed. The agent did not offer prior Zoning Board of Appeal decisions supporting the application. During site inspection it was noted that all gates accessing the fully fenced and well landscaped property swing in and that an outdoor shower is located along the southern lot line, shared with a residential neighbor, and that there was no garage or other accessory structure at the site. The survey illustrates the following building coverage,for structures built prior to zoning: Existing House&Porch 3,039 square feet 20.0% Existing Cottage&Porch 853 square feet 5.6% Total Existing 3,892 square feet 25.6% Proposed Pool 420 square feet 2.8% Total Proposed&Existing 4,312 square feet 28.4% At the request of the Board,the applicant's agent submitted a prior ZBA decision(#6462 dated May 18, 2011) for a nearby residential property in which the applicant was granted relief for 26% lot coverage. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on May 9,2019 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The hamlet of New Suffolk was primarily developed in the late 19th and early 20th Century. Most homes are located on irregular shaped and undersized lots, many of which do not conform to current zoning. While the proposed pool increases the degree of non-conforming lot coverage, all structures at the site were built prior to zoning. A pool is a common accessory to a residence and the subject property is well screened by mature landscaping from adjoining residences and the public roadways. 2. Town Law 5267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue,other than an area variance. The total lot coverage for existing structures,all built prior to zoning, is 25.6°/x, greater than the maximum allowed 20% lot coverage. As a result of the pre-existing improvements on the property,any addition to the site will require an area variance for lot coverage. J Page 3,June 6,2019 #7272,Whitecap North Fork,LLC \ V SCTM No. 1000-117-9-13 3. Town Law✓x267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance granted herein is mathematically substantial,representing 42%relief from the code over the original, existing, Iot coverage. However,the 420 square feet of additional coverage for an accessory pool represents only 2.8%of the 15,199 square feet parcel. 4. Town Law :4267-b(3)(b)(4). No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. 5. Town Law 12267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6. Town Law 4267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of 14 feet by 30 feet inground swimming pool while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Planamento, seconded by Member Acampora, and duly carried,to GRANT the variance as applied for, and shown on the survey prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin, III, Land Surveyor, last revised March 14,2019. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Pool mechanicals shall be placed in a sound deadening enclosure. 2. Drywell for pool de-watering shall be installed. 3. The wood platform deck located in the west yard and measuring approximately ten feet by ten feet shall be removed. That the above conditions be written into the Building I'nspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variances)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. In the event that an approval is granted subject to conditions, the approval shall not be deemed effective until the required conditions have been met; and failure to comply therewith will render this approval null and void. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Pursuant to Chapter 250-146(B) of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Page 4,June 6,2019 97272,Whitecap North Fork,LLC SCTM No. 1000-117-9-13 / , (AV Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured, and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three (3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may,upon written request prior to the date of expiration,grant an extension not to exceed three (3) consecutive one (1)year terms. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Weisman(Chairperson),Dantes, Planamento, Acampora and Lehnert. (5-0) r fslies Weisman,Chairperson Approved for filing &/ 7 / QOl 1 . - ,6 TR OF CONc. ROADWAY SURVEY OF PROPERTY -., SIT UA TE RECerviop, S 850409,309'30 E 4 •+4 100.00 0 �` NEW SUFFOLK RAR �2019 3 �► L,NK �, „ .� A TOWN OF S 0 U T H C��DIc so. 4n,4 ft Cst` �C3,�C•4-W. ° a R ���� � SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK '9Ppls" cv • � r. 1.4E. ° _ 4 S.C. TAX No. 1000- 117-09-13 1f) ROOF OVER WOOD ORCH a37.1 r 14A' 40.4' 6 to f SCALE 1 =20 rI' 44 , %t AUGUST 3, 2010 ro p R a o N ° APRIL 18, 2018 ADD PROPOSED POOL 4 R JULY 13, 2018 RELOCATED PROPOSED POOL W ° MARCH 14, 2019 REVISED PROPOSED POOL O I 4 — s a ✓ AREA — 15,199 sq. ft. :.. w 29.z• / 0.349 ac. B. 10.-J. 4 CONC. o STEPS Al 7O BE BE ' • W �'� BUILDING COVERAGE "' N swiE°Opg $ /°4' DESCRIPTION AREA % LOT COVERAGE EXISTING HOUSE & PORCH 3,039 sq. ff. 20.0% PROP. 4'X8' UIELEPHONE v 4 O V DRY - D T r 4• EXISTING COTTAGE & PORCH 853 sq. ft. 5.6% ' C UNE W 4 TOTAL EXISTING 3,892 sq. ft. 25.6% _ csPooL f ° PROPOSED POOL 420 sq. ft. 2.8% � 44 ° h d©�❑ TOTAL PROPOSED &•EXISTING 4,312 sq. ft. 28.4% ' SLATE WAUC � W , P ° L►NE awl PCESOOL .1 as 4 E FINAL MAP �.4• � �l w •� � REVIEWED BY ZBA � + ; ° SEE DECISION # - 7 PREPARED� " "E W a aD w oz I O _7 �s DATED, I ® it g EO SLATE O `�` O 4 CESSPOOL 20.4' I' UNAUTHORDFD ALTERATION OR ADDRION Ur— No. 50467 CONC.M 11.16' -u^j y //,1 V f FFOFI 7HE1NY�U(STATE ■ —IY ���, , , ,o Nathan Corwin IN ��D•L.N. o.B'� CHaN UNIC FENCE ,°' THE,�D SURVEYOI�INI4:D SEAL DR Land Surveyor URB 3 3'S. BELGNNI B v '' EDGE ROW ,0.3 CE.4,& I EM60SSED SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED ° LOC4 K CURB 1.41 a I TO BE A VAUD TRUE COPY. FRAME Al n ®�� O�f a v ` ��ASPHAIT DRNEWAY a 4 '° 4 1 O R1ff�MOMS!VC6 lD HEatEDN SKALL 1UIN GARAGE �V a f• ONLY TO 1HE PERSON FOR WNW1 THE swwr �j ° ° 4 ' s 4 ! IS PREPARED.AND ON HIS 9E}"TO THE Successor To:StaMey J.Isaksan,Jr.L.S. 1 00.00 ° TIRE coatPANr GOVERNM NLMEOM AMUD AND Joseph A d>segrro L.S. N v 70�1gnE A OF 7lIE LF DION•Imm 'RHe Swvep—Mdjw&kns — Ste Plan — Cara*wffos LcD=! /0/F TWON.CERRNCAIMNS ARE NOT TRAHSERASM MICHA& E: DilLL4 7HE EIOSTENCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS PHONE (631)7272090 Fat (631)727-1727 & BARBARA BUMERWORTH 10 �' � EYRD OR EASE= OF RECO . tF OFFICES LOCATED AT AWUNG ADDRESS NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. 1586 Main Road f P.O.Bot 19 Jamesport, New York 11947 Jamespart.New York 11947 , i �- RECEIVED MAR 10 2021 ZBA#6270 zoning Board Of Appal, { 1175 First Street, New Suffolk 1000-117-7-27 Variance granted for 24.8% Lot Coverage for New Construction of a house addition in order to expand living space. 4 Office Location: rg oUTA Mailing Address:01 r� Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank � 53095 Main Road 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) 1 P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 • �O� Southold,NY 11971-0959 OUN1Y,N� http://southoldtown.northfork.net RECEIVED " Vl ed BOARD OF APPEALS /0 '. 60 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JUN 2 2 2009 Tel.(631)765-1809 Fax(631)765-9064 Southold Town Cleric FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS, DECISION MEETING OF JUNE 16,2009 ZBA FILE#6270—EFSTATHIOS and MARYANN KATSOULAS,Applicants PROPERTY LOCATION: 1175 First Street, New Suffolk CTM Parcel 117-7-27 SEQRA DETERMINATION:The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions,without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23,and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated December 5, 2008 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county- wide or inter-community impact. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The subject property is a non-conforming 15,271.61 square foot lot in the Residential R- 40 District, with street frontage along First Street. It is improved with a single-family, two-story frame house with attached garage and in-ground swimming pool with wood deck as shown on the architectural plot plan by Oyster Bay Drafting dated 4/22/08 page N-1. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances under Sections 280-122 and ZBA Interpretation#5039(R.Walz) based on the Building Inspector's November 12,2008 Notice of Disapproval concerning proposed additions and alterations to the existing dwelling, which new construction will constitute an increase in the degree of front yard setback and lot coverage non- conformances. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicants propose to add an 8.11ft x 9.2 ft one story addition and new Bilco doors to their dwelling in order to expand their living space.The addition will maintain the pre-existing non-conforming front yard setback of 4.40 feet. Pursuant to ZBA interpret6tion in Walz(#5039)such additions and alterations will constitute an increase in the degree of non- conformance. In addition,the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval noted the existing lot coverage of 24.8%will increase to 25.5% with the proposed additions while the code permits maximum lot coverage of 20%. These calculations were based upon plans by Oyster Bay Drafting dated 4/22/08. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: At the public hearing on April 23, 2009, the Board requested that the applicant submit a letter from Oyster Bay Drafting:and/or a licensed architect or engineer or a new surrey showing the existing and proposed lot coverage since it was not clear from the plans submitted. On June 3,2009 that Board received a letter dated May 27,2009 that was signed and stamped by Dennis Mele, licensed architect, noting an existing lot coverage of 24.3% and proposed lot coverage of 24.8°/x. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: • l 1 t �1 Page 2—E.and M.Katsoulas ZBA#6270—June 16,2009 n CTM 117-7-27 . 11 1. Town Law §267-b(3)(63)(1). Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The proposed addition in the side yard of the house will not be seen from the street because it is screened by another part of the existing house and is well screened from the neighbor along the side yard by an existing side yard fence. The proposed addition is small at only 74.61 square feet and only one story while the house itself is two stories. 2. Town Law 4267-b(3-)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicants cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue,other than an area variance because the construction is already over the permitted lot coverage and has a pre-existing non-conforming front yard setback,so any addition will require a variance. 3. Town Law 267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance granted herein in terms of the proposed lot coverage is not substantial because it is an increase of only 0.5%. The variance for maintaining the 4.40 ft. front yard setback is not substantial in so far as the proposed addition will maintain this pre-existing non-conforming setback and because it is a technical interpretation since the small addition is not proposed in the front but rather along the side of the house. 4. Town Law 267-b 3 b 5. The difficulty has been self-created because the applicants already enjoy the benefit of lot coverage beyond that which is permitted by code through a previous ZBA variance(#5522 June 3,2004). 5. Town Law 4267-b(36)(4). No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 6. Town Law$267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicants to enjoy the benefit of a slightly expanded living space in their dwelling, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B,motion was offered by Member Weisman,seconded by Chairman Goehringer,and duly carried,to GRANT the variances as applied for and shown on the architectural drawings by Oyster Bay Drafting (Sheets N 14) dated 4122108 and lot coverage calculations as confirmed by Dennis Mele,Architect in his letter dated May 27, 2009 received by the Board of Appeals on June 3,2009,and with an attached table of zoning calculations which amend the calculations that appear on Sheet N-1 of the architectural drawings. Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions,or demolitions which are not shown on the applicant's diagrams or survey site maps, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use,setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code,other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes: members Oliva(Chairwoman), Goehdnger, Di ' ' ,Simon and W sma i luti s duly adopted(4-0). RARD P.GOEHRINGER,CH RMAN Approved for Filing 61 120 .E a , �v Ir ��r '^D ' ZBA#6020&6127 MAR 10 2021 735 Jackson Street, New Suffolk Ii 1000-117-9-6 ZQR1nU � � c Of�,�f'eajs #6020 Variance granted for 21.4% Lot Coverage for New Construction and Alterations, #6127 Variance granted for 22.1% Lot Coverage for installation of a swimming pool. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS- S0UPy Mailing Address: JOV James Dinizio,Jr.,Chairman Southold Town Mall ti0 ��O 53095 Main Road o P.O. Box 1179 Gerard P.Goehringer Southold,NY 11971-0959 Ruth D. Oliva GOffice Location: Michael A.Simon :40 i0 Town Annex/First Floor,North Fork Bank Leslie Kanes Weisman l�Cf�U N 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net RECEIVED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD d.3`'�5 '°►s'° Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 IfAf 3 0 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATIONS®IJIthAId W11 Clet MEETING OF MAY 10, 2007 ZB File No. 6020— Paul and Maureen Cacioppo Property Location: 735 Jackson Street, New Suffolk CTM 117-9-6 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 13,055 sq. ft. non-conforming parcel in an R-40 District with 100 feet along Jackson Street and is improved with a single-family dwelling and accessory cottage building, as shown on Site Plan dated 2-23-07 prepared by Boulevard Planning P.C. and June 22, 1955 survey by Otto W.VanTuyl & Son. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances based on the Building Inspector°s February 7, 2007 Notice of Disapproval, amended March 6, 2007, stating: (1) under Section 280-15, the, side yard setback shall not be less than five feet, for the existing accessory cottage, approximately 16 feet in height; (2) under Section 280-15B, the existing accessory garage will result in a side yard location instead of a code-required rear yard, after the proposed construction; (3) the proposed additions to a nonconforming accessory cottage use are not permitted under Sections 280-13C and 280-121A; no enlargement, alteration, extension, reconstruction, or restoration, or placement on a different portion of the lot or parcel of land occupied by such use on the effective date of this chapter, nor shall any external evidence of such use be increased by any means whatsoever; and (4) under Section 280-124, the proposed additions and alterations to the single-family dwelling are not permitted for the reason that the new construction will be less than 35 feet from the rear lot line and the lot coverage will exceed the code limitation of 20 percent building coverage. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on April 26, 2007, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: Page 2—May 10,2007 ZB File No. 6020-Paul and Maur;,-A'acloppo - CTM No.117-9-6 1 A AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant proposes a second-story addition and extensions to an existing single family dwelling, as well as a five-ft. wraparound pergola attached to the existing nonconforming accessory building, as shown on site and architectural'drawings prepared by Boulevard Planning, P. C. dated 2-23-07 (SP1, Al, A2, A3, A4,A5, C1). REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of alternative relief will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The lot coverage requested by applicant is 2,946 square feet (22.5%) instead of the code limitation of 2,611 square feet (20%). Denial of the requested variances, and grant of alternative relief will provide for more conformity to the code, substantially reducing the lot coverage as requested (22.5%) to 21.4%. The alternative relief for a 6 ft. reduction in the size of the garage, from 24x23 to 18x23 would also increase the rear setback to substantially meet the code minimum setback, from the request of 27.75 feet, to 32 feet. The alternative relief will not produce an undesirable change or detriment to nearby properties because most of the homes in the immediate neighborhood are one-story buildings, while others on Jackson Avenue are much larger(although on larger parcels). 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance due to the nonconforming size of the property and buildings. 3. The variances requested are substantial. The code requires a minimum rear yard setback at 35 feet, minimum 5 ft. side yard setback for the addition to an accessory cottage, and maximum lot coverage of 20%. The applicant requested a 7.25 ft. reduction to allow additions to the dwelling 27.75 feet from the rear lot line, 4.5 ft. side yard setback for the accessory building, 22.5% lot coverage for an increase of 326 square feet (2.5% of the lot size, or 12.5% of the code allowance. 4. The difficulty was self-created as the applicant knew the conditions that were present when the property was purchased. 5. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance (alternative relief) in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 6. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of additions and pergola, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 3—May 10,2007 ZB File No. 6020-Paul and Maur'',_,, t wacioppo CTM No.117-9-6 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-13, motion was offered by Member Oliva, seconded by Member Weisman, and duly carried, to Deny the relief as applied for, and to Grant alternative relief: 1) by reducing the length of the garage by 6 feet to allow a reduced size of 18x23 feet (instead of 24x23 feet), increasing the rear setback to 32 feet (and conforming side yard of 12 feet); 2) allowing the 5-ft. wide pergola shown on the 2/23/07 site and elevation drawings prepared by Boulevard Planning P.C. at 4.5 feet from the side yard and 6 feet from the rear yard, with the condition to pergola remain open, not enclosed; 3) reducing the overall lot coverage to a maximum of 21.4%. That these ZBA conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions, or demolitions which are not shown on the applicant's diagrams or survey site maps, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Dinizio (Chairman), Oliva, Goehringer, Simon, and Weisman. This Resolution was dull dopted (5- ' aures Dinizio Jr., Ch an 5-3a -2007 Approved for Filing RECEIVED ; AY &Z Southold Town Cleric {r - APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS,_.� �0�So Mailing Address: Gerard P Goehringer,Chairman hp� ��® Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 Ruth D.Oliva Southold,NY 11971-0959 James Dinizio,Jr. �' • Q Office Location: Michael A. Simon0 ,mai Town Annex/First Floor,North Fork Bank Leslie Kanes Weisman COU , 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RECEIVED �- Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 tA'Y 2 2 2008 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATIONm MEETING OF May 8, 2008 Southold OWn CleIrk ZBA#6127—PAUL and MAUREEN CACIOPPO Property Location: 735 Jackson Street, New Suffolk CTM 117-9-6 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further review under SEQRA. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicants' 134,055 square foot nonconforming parcel is located in an R-40 Low-Density Residential Zone District with 100 feet along Jackson Street. The property is improved with a single-family dwelling and accessory cottage building. BASIS -OF APPLICATION: Requested are variances based on the Building Inspector's Section 280-124, based on the Building Inspector's December 27, 2007 Notice of Disapproval concerning the location of an accessory in-ground swimming pool, which will exceed the code limitation of 20% lot coverage. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The property is improved with a house and accessory cottage building, which were the subject,of variance under#6020 dated 5- 30-2007. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on February 28, 2008 and April 24, 2008, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The Applicant's original application proposed an accessory 18' x 30' in-ground swimming pool, which was denied for the Page►2-May 8,2008 ZBA#6127-P.and M.Cacioppo CTM 117-9-6 reason the lot coverage would be 23.4% instead of the 20% code limitation under Section 280-124. AMENDED VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: On March 19, 2008, the applicant by their agent submitted an amended plan dated March 12, 2008 as an alternative, showing a reduction in the size of the swimming pool from 18' x 30' to 15' x 25', and reducing the lot coverage percentage for more conformity with the code requirements. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: . 1. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(3)(1). Grant of the alternative relief, as amended by applicant, will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. In discussions with the applicant over the excess lot coverage and neighboring concerns, the applicant made the following amendments to their proposal: Evergreen scrubs will be planted and maintained along the rear fence and at least 15 feet along the wood fence, along the east wall of the pool. The pool heater and pump equipment will be placed at the east side of the pool and will be soundproofed. The water to fill the pool will be brought from an outside contractor. There will be an overflow well for drainage of the pool water. The pool size will be reduced from 18' x 30'pool to 15' x 25'. The lot coverage as amended will result in a maximum of 22.1%. This alternative reduces the variance relief and screening will provide visual buffers so that it is not easily visible from adjacent properties. The 22.1% lot coverage is the maximum the Board will approve. 2. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(2)-. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than as area variance. 3. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(M. The relief that was requested for 23.4% lot coverage is substantial. The amended requested for 22.1% lot coverage is less and will provide greater conformity to the code requirement, and will result in a smaller pool of 375 square feet, of which 274 square feet is over the code limitation of 20% by 2.1%. 4. Town Law 267-b 3 5 . The difficulty has been self created insofar as the applicant desires to build an accessory swimming pool. 5. Town Law §267-b(53)(b)(4). No evidence has been submitted to suggest that the relief as granted for alternative relief will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. Nti .f Page13—May 8,2008 ZBA#6127—P.and M.Cacioppo CTM 117-9-6 ,l� 6. Grant of the alternative relief, as amended, is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a swimming pool, while preserving the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Oliva, seconded by Member Weisman, and duly carried, to Grant the variance as amended, as shown on Map SP-1 (Project No. 0643) last- dated March 12, 2008, prepared by Peconic Permit Expediting, subject to the following Conditions: 1. The existing stockade fencing shall be maintained at a height as exists of 6 feet tall, and evergreen scrubs shall be planted at 4 ft. separated intervals, 6' to 8' tall, continuously maintained along the west and north borders. 2. The pool shall be open to the sky (not roofed over or enclosed). 3. The pool shall be fenced in, as per Codes. 4. No outdoor lighting of the pool for nighttime use. 5. The landowner shall plant evergreen scrubs along the northern border and at least 15 feet along the eastern fence wood fence near the east wall of the pool. 6. The pool equipment (pump/heater/filter) shall be placed at the east side of the pool and shall be soundproofed. 7. The water for the pool will be brought from another location by truck or other contracting service, and shall not be from the owner's premises or a well. 8. There shall be a drywell for overflow of pool water and proper drainage. 9. The pool size shallbe reduced from 18'x30' to 15'x25'. 10. The lot coverage is limited to a maximum of 22.1%. That the above ZBA conditions shall be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. .Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions, or demolitions which are not shown on the applicant's diagrams or survey site maps, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This � t - Pageh—May 8,2006 ZBA#6127—P.and M.Cacioppo CTM 117-9-6 action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Mote of the Board: Ayes: Mem ehrin Chairman), Oliva, Dinizio, Simon, and Weisman. This Resol i n w, my opted GERARD P. GOEHRING , CHAI MAN 5/2-0/2008 1 Approved for Filing MAR 10 2029 ZBA#7392 1175 Second Street, New Suffolk 1000-117-7-20 Variance granted for 23.9% Lot Coverage BOARD MEMBERS -- OF SOUj - Southold Town Hall 'Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �� 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 'tom l0 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes G Q Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. .1% • �O 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento O�ij�`,O Southold,NY 11971 NIV http://southoldtownny.gov C E IV ED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD + Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 A U G 2 5 /n2020 . 0, nu FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATIOJL S®utold Tows Clerk MEETING OF AUGUST 20, 2020 ZBA FILE: 7392 NAME OF APPLICANT: George &Lynn Krug PROPERTY LOCATION: 1175 2nd Street,New Suffolk,NY SCTM No. 1000-117-7-20 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type H category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated February 6, 2020 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: The relief, permit, or interpretation requested in this application is listed under the Minor Actions exempt list and is not subject to review under Chapter 268. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The subject property is a 5,500 square foot property located in an R-40 Zoning District. The property has a 50-foot frontage along Second Street, then runs west 110 feet to the rear property line. The property then runs south 50 feet before returning 110 feet to Second Street. The property is improved with an existing one- and one-half story single family residence with a shed in the rear yard as shown on the survey prepared by Michael W.Minto,L.S., Iast revised January 2020. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XXIII, Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's December 16, 2019 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling; at 1) located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet; 2) located less than the code required minimum side yard setback of 10 feet; 3) located less than the code required minimum combined side yard setback of 25 feet; 4) more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%; located at: 1175 Second Street,New Suffolk,NY. SCTM No. 1000-117-7-20. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances for a proposed front yard setback of 22.1 feet where a minimum 35 foot setback is required by code; a proposed single side yard setback of 3 feet where a minimum of 10 feet is required; a combined side yard setback 11.1 feet where the code requires a minimum of 25 feet; and a proposed lot coverage of 23.9%where 20%maximum is,permitted by code. Page 2,August 20,2020 37392,Krug SCTM No. 1000-117-7-20 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Testimony from the applicants/homeowners and from an adjacent neighbor in support of the application was taken during the public hearing. Letters from two of the neighboring property owners in support of this application have been received. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on August 9,2020 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law X267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. Many of the residential structures in this neighborhood have pre-existing non-conforming setbacks and lot coverage. The majority of this application is for a second-floor addition that falls within the existing footprint of the house. The first floor Iiving space addition on the rear of the existing dwelling is only 12.5 square feet, will not be seen from the street and maintains the pre-existing non- conforming setbacks of the subject dweIIing. The proposed pergola addition in the side yard is an open structure and is not habitable space. Therefore, an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood will not happen. 2. Town Law $267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Any alteration to this pre-existing non-conforming house will need variance relief, even for additions to the second floor over the existing footprint. 3. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial, the Iot coverage variance request represents 19.5% relief from the code; the front yard setback variance represents 36.85% relief from the code; the single side yard setback represents 70% relief from the code; and the combined side yard setback represents 55.6% relief from the code. However, the majority of the variance relief is for second floor additions that fall within the existing footprint of the residence. The side yard setback relief is for an open-air pergola that is not living space, but an overhead covering. 4. _Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(4). No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with,Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code and the conditions of this board. 5. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6. Town Law §267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of first and second floor additions and alterations and an exterior pergola while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Lehnert, seconded by Member Acampora, and duly carried,to Page 3,August 20,2020 _ -97392,Krug SCTM No. 1000-117-7-20 GRANT the variances as applied for, and shown on the survey prepared by Michael Minto, Land Surveyor, last revised January 2020, and Architectural Plans prepared by Charles Thomas, Architect, last revised January 22, 2020. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: 1. The proposed pergola shall remain,unenclosed and non-habitable space. That the above condition be written into t/ie Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. In the event that this is an approval subject to conditions, the approval shall not be deemed effective until such time that the foregoing conditions are met; and failure to comply therewith will render this approval null and void. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Pursuant to Chapter 280-146(B) of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured, and/or a subdivision map has'not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three (3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may,upon written request prior to the date of expiration, grant an extension not to exceed three(3) consecutive one (1)year terms. Vote of the Board: Ayes:Members Weisman(Chairperson)Acampora,Dantes,Lehnert, and Planamento(5-0). Ilese Kane, Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing / /2020 7 r� l ZBA#6773 1200 First Street, New Suffolk MAR I O 2021 1000-117-7-30 New Construction with Area Variance granted for 38.2% Lot Coverage with Maxirn&nlot c"'� ''� °Pf� , -E . Coverage allowed at 30% (Mil Zone) BOARD MEMBERS - Of soar Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �� y0 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantes Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Homing '�'c+� ® �O 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider `yCo� Southold,NY 11971 ��Ny http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS RECEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 _ NOV 1 3 2014 Southold Town clerk FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMWATION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 6,2014 ZBA FILE: 6773 NAME OF APPLICANT: William F. Grella and Gary D.Osborn SCTM: 1000-117-7-30 PROPERTY LOCATION: 1200 First Street(adj.to Great Peconic Bay)New Suffolk,NY SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type 11 category of the State's List of Actions,without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated June 27, 2014, stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268,Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated Aug. 21, 2014. Based upon the information provided' on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed request for less than the required front yard setback of 35 feet,less than the code required rear yard setback of 35 feet,less than the code required single side yard setback of 10 feet, and less than the code required combine side yard setback of 25 feet are EXEMPT from Coastal Consistency Review.Furthermore,the request for proposed lot coverage of 38.2%where 30% is allowed by Code, and the proposed bulkhead setback of 21 feet where 75 feet is required by Code is INCONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. On September 16, 2014, the Board received an amended Notice of Disapproval, correcting the Zone District from R40 to MR. Based on the new Notice of Disapproval the setbacks and lot coverage changed as follows; a front yard setback required of 35 feet, minimum side yard setback of 25 feet, combined side yard setbacks of 50 feet and maximum permitted lot coverage of 30 percent. The new side yard setbacks are still exempt. However, the applicant has proposed a reduction of lot coverage from the existing 66.9% to a proposed 3 8.2%where 30%is allowed by code, an increase of the bulkhead setback from the existing 2 feet, to the proposed 21 feet, and the relocation and construction of a new county- certified septic system. Based upon these mitigating factors it is our recommendation that the proposed request for proposed lot coverage of 38.2% and the proposed bulkhead setback of 21 feet are therefore CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards, and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. Furthermore, the proposed construction of more than the code permitted 2.5 stories is proposed to render the structure FEMA flood zone compliant, and is therefore CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards, and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property is a 3621 sq. ft. parcel in the MII Zone. The property has 3512 sq. ft. of buildable land. The northerly lot line is adjacent to a single-family dwelling similarly Page 2 of 3—November 6,2014 ZBA#6773—Grella/Osborn SCTM#1000-117-7-30 located in the MII Zone. The easterly lot line abuts the waters of Great Peconic Bay. The southerly lot line is adjacent to a larger property currently serving as a boat yard also located within the MR Zone. The westerly lot line lies along First(1") Street.A large portion of the property is located in FEMA flood zone VE eI 8,with almost all of the rest of the property located in FEMA flood zone AE el 6. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Articles XXIII,XXII and III, Sections 280-56,280-116B and 280-14(Bulk Schedule)and the Building Inspector's August 7,2013, amended and renewed May 19,2014, amended June 2,2014,amended July 14,2014,Amended September 16,2014 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for partial demolition,reconstruction, additions and alterations of an existing single family dwelling,at; 1)less than the code required front yard setback of 35 feet,2)less than the code required single side yard setback of 25 feet,3)less than the code required combined side yard setback of 50 feet,4)more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 30%,.5)less than the code required bulkhead setback of 75 feet, 6)more than the code permitted 2 stories. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests Six (6) variances to partially demolish, reconstruct, and make additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling with 1) a proposed front yard setback of 3 feet, where 35 feet is required by Code; 2) a proposed 2.7 ft. side yard setback where 25 feet is required; 3) a proposed combined 13 feet side yard setback where 50 feet is required; 4) a proposed lot coverage of 38.2%, where a maximum of 30% is allowed; 5)a variance for a proposed bulkhead setback of 21 feet where 75 feet is required by code; and 6) a proposed building height of three (3) stories, where no more than two (2) stories are allowed by Code. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The file contains a document published Dec. 19, 2013 by the NYS Dept. of State,Division of Building Standards and Codes, and designated as a Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code Technical Bulletin titled "Determination of Stories Above Grade in elevated One- and Two-Family Dwellings in Flood Zone Hazard Areas,"which was deemed to be inapplicable to this application in a related code interpretation (see ZBA File 46789).The file contains a Letter of Non-Jurisdiction from the NYSDEC dated Aug. 16, 2013.The file also contains a letter submitted from a neighbor living on the opposite side of 1st St. who is objecting to the applicant's proposed project. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on Sept.4,2014,and on Oct.2,2014,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law W7-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. A single family dwelling is a permitted structure within the ME zone. The existing dwelling was constructed in 1962,without the need for any variances. The structure has a valid CO. The proposed partial demolition, reconstruction, additions and alterations to the existing single family dwelling will substantially reduce the current degree of non-conformance on this small lot. The subject structure must be elevated to FEMA requirements to protect the property. 2. Town Law X267-W)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than with the grant of area variances. The existing structure was constructed in 1962' and is located on a small non-conforming parcel. There is no feasible conforming area on the parcel available to move the structure, even if it was feasible to move it. The new construction required to make the structure FEMA flood zone compliant cannot be done without the grant of variances. 3. Town Law $267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance granted herein for a front yard setback of 3 feet where 35 feet is required is mathematically substantial, representing+91% relief from the code. The variances granted herein for a single side yard setback of 2.7 feet where a minimum of 25 feet is required, and a combined side yard setback of 13 o Page 3 of 3—November 6,2014 ZBA 110 0 Gre-7-30 orn 1 / SCTM#1000-117-7-30 1 feet where a minimum of 50 feet is required are substantial, representing 89% and 74% relief from the code. The variance granted herein for lot coverage of 38.2% where 30% is allowed by code is substantial representing 27% relief from the code. The variance granted herein for a bulkhead setback of 21 feet where 75 feet is required by code is substantial representing 72% relief from the code. However, with the removal of the nonconforming decking and concrete planters, total lot coverage will be decreased from the current 66.9%, and the distance to the bulkhead will be increased from the current 2 feet. Moreover,there is no conforming area on this small parcel that is outside of the flood zone areas, or that is available to relocate the existing or the proposed reconstructed structure. In accordance with a related ZBA code interpretation in File#6789,dated Nov. 6,2014, a variance for a proposed non-conforming third story required to make the existing single family dwelling FEMA compliant, is no longer required. 4. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant will construct a new, county certified septic system. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code,and the applicable regulations of other Town, county,and state agencies. 5. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6. Town Law X267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a newly reconstructed FEMA compliant single family dwelling,while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Horning, seconded by Member Weisman (Chairperson), and duly carried,to GRANT, the variances as applied for, and shown on the survey drawn by John T. Metzger, Licensed Land Surveyor,last revision dated May 28, 2014. Subject to the following conditions; CONDITIONS: 1.The stone and concrete retaining wall planters in the front yard shall be removed. 2.AC equipment will be relocated to the southern side of the structure,adjacent to the marina. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase`the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes. Members Weisman (Chairperson), Schneider, Horning, Dantes, Goehringer. This Resolution was duly adopted(5-0). Leslie Karies Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing /2014 MAR I ® 2021 v i v ZBA#6595 1060 Second Street, New Suffolk 1000-117-7-25 Variance granted for 21% Lot Coverage for New Construction and Alterations BOARD MEMBERS O�soy Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson O�� jif�l 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 James Dinizio,Jr. Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer A Nc Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning • ,^�aa�O 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider `yCOU ��` Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net Av ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RCE J32012 Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 '31F OC 2 FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION C� MEETING OF OCTOBER 18,2012 So &olown Jerk ZBA FILE: 6595 NAME OF APPLICANT: Solution East LLC PROPERTY LOCATION: 1060 2nd Street(corner King Street)New Suffolk,NY SCTM: 1000-117-7-25 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated September 17, 2012 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: The relief, permit, or interpretation requested in this application is listed under the Minor Actions'exempt list and is not subject to review under Chapter 268. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The Applicant's property is a 6,642 sq. ft. parcel in the R-40 Zone. The northerly lot line measures 101.35 feet along an adjacent parcel. The easterly lot line measures 65.51 feet along another parcel. The southerly lot line measures 101.22 feet along King St., and the westerly lot line measures 65.51 feet along 2nd. Street. The parcel is a corner lot and has two front yards. The property is improved with a single family dwelling, as shown with proposed new construction, on the survey drawn by Elizabeth Thompson, Architect,dated June 22,2012. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XXIII Code Section 280-124, based on an application for building permit and the Building Inspector's August 9, 2012, amended August 30, 2012 Notice of Disapproval concerning proposed addition and-alteration to a single'family dwelling, at; 1) less than the code required front yard setback of 35 feet for both front yards on this corner lot, 2) more than the code permitted lot coverage of 20% maximum. RELIEF REOUESTED: The Applicant requests two variances to construct a porch/deck addition with one front yard setback of 16.58 feet,and the other front yard setback of 14.75 feet,where Code requires a 35 feet setback. The Applicant also requests a variance for proposed lot coverage of 21%,where Code allows 20%. . FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on October 4,2012,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation, personal inspection of the property Page 2 of 3—October 2012 ZBA File#6595—Solution East LLC � 11 CTM 1000-117-7-25 and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law 5267-b(3Nb)(1). Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. This long established residential neighborhood has many buildings with non-conforming setbacks from the streets. The non-conforming front yard setback on 2°d.St.iS pre- existing, and will not be changed. A wrap around porch is customary to many single family dwellings, and the porch will enhance the appearance of the building and also the neighborhood at this corner street location. 2. Town Law 267-b 3 b 2 .The benefit sought by the Applicant cannot be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The two non-conforming front yard setbacks on 2nd St. and on King St. are pre-existing, and therefore any construction in those areas requires variances. 3. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial; representing +54% variance relief from the Code required 35 feet for the front yard setback on 2"d. St., and+53%relief from the Code required setback of 35 feet for the front yard setback on King St. However,the non-conforming setback on 2"d St. is pre-existing, and will not be reduced by the porch construction. The non-conforming setback on King St. is also pre-existing, and although the proposed porch will further reduce this setback as it is measured to the lot line, a 16.7 foot area of grass remains in what functionally operates as the applicant's side yard and which is screened from the street by an existing mature hedgerow. 4. Town Law 5267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The property has an established hedgerow on the lot line along most of King St. and along the length of the easterly lot line. The Applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. The Applicant will comply with all of the conditions stated below. 5. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6. Town_Law X267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of additions and alterations, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE .BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Horning, seconded by Member Weisman (Chairperson), and duly carried,to GRANT, the variances as applied for, and shown on the site plan submitted by Elizabeth Thompson, Architect, and dated June 22, 2012 as amended and attached to an a mail from Elizabeth Thompson RA dated October 11,2012 to show the relocation of the outdoor shower from the side yard to the proposed open deck, and architectural drawings by Elizabeth Thompson RA dated 6/22/12 an labeled first floor plan, second floor plan, roof plan, north elevation(amended to remove the outdoor shower),east elevation, south and west elevations. CONDITIONS: 1. The Applicant will install a silt fence and hay bales along the work area adjoining the adjacent northern property to contain all soils and debris on site. 2. The Applicant will comply with the asbestos removal regulations in New York State per copy of same received by the Zoning Board dated October 11, 2012. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. I Page 3 of 3—October 18,2012 �1 , ZBA File#6595—Solution East LLC • CTM- 1000-117-7-25 Any deviation from the survey,site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed to this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de mintmis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes-Members Weisman(Chairperson),Dinizio,Schneider, Horning Absent was. Member Goehringer This Resolution was duly adopted(4-0). a Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing f0/= /2012 ZBA#6462 MAR 10 2021 �I 2395 Jackson Street &Second Street, New Suffolk 1000-117-9-25 ;twrri 7.1i Variance granted for 26% Lot Coverage for New Construction Additions/Alterations i� ' BOARD MEMBERS SO Southold Town Hall L� Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �0��0 UryOIO 53095 Main Road a P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 James Dintzio,Jr. Office Location: Gerard R Goehringer G Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Ken SchneiderOU Southold,NY U 97�(� http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ;Z2 EIY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 3 $ Tel. (631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 3 FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINA #hold Town Clerk MEETING OF MAY 18,2011 ZBA FILE: 6462 NAME OF APPLICANT: Barry and Carol Sweeney PROPERTY LOCATION: 2395 Jackson St.and Second St.,New Suffolk,NY STM#1000-117-9-25 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated March 15, 2011 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued his reply dated April 26,2011.Bas ed upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department,as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is EXEMPT from Coastal Consistency Review. Regarding the 6% over the 20% lot coverage variance request is consistent in'this instance; the action would not be discordant with existing natural scenic components and character. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject property is a non-conforming 10,340 sq. ft. lot improved with a two story dwelling and accessory garage it is a corner lot with two front yards. It has 101.98 feet of frontage on Jackson St., 101.40 feet along Second St., 101.90 feet on the north property line and 101.47 feet along the west property line as shown on the site pian dated 2/22/11 prepared by Garrett Strang,Architect. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variance from Article XXIII Code Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's February 22, 2011 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a building permit to construct additions and alterations, including raising the dwelling for FEMA compliance, to a single family dwelling at 1) rear yard setback of less than the code required 35 feet,2) lot coverage of more than the code required 20%. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant proposes to construct additions/alterations, including raising the dwelling to FEMA regulations,requiring variances for a rear yard setback of 24 feet where the code requires 35 feet and lot coverage of 260/6 where the code permits a maximum of 20%. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: During the Hearing, the Board asked the agent to provide lot coverage of surrounding neighbors. In a letter, dated May 16, 2011 the agent for applicant provided a list of nine properties within 500 feet of the subject property with lot coverage above the 20%allowed by code and the information was �•, Page 2—May 18,2011 ZBA Filett6462-Sweeney CTM: 1000-117-9-25 obtained from Southold Town records. The average lot coverage among the nine properties, which varied from 21%to 55% is 31.9%,is more than the applicant is requesting. �,(�� FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: 1\A11 The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on May 5,2011,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variance of will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. This area of New Suffolk consists of many non- conforming lots with non-conforming setbacks. The applicant is removing the existing accessory garage and incorporating an attached garage into the proposed additions and alterations. 2. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Due to the location of the existing dwelling on a small lot of 10,340 sq. ft. with two front yards,any renovations/additions to the dwelling will require variances. 3. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial. The rear yard setback represents a 31%relief from the code and the lot coverage represents a 30%relief from the code. However in comparison to other older improved lots in the area they are not substantial since there have been several variances granted in the area for rear yard setbacks and lot coverage. 4. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact,on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The subject property is relatively flat and the control of drainage on site is proposed as per code. 5. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty is self created in that the applicant chooses to increase non- conformities on the subject property but the proposed non-conformities are in keeping with the nature of the existing non-conforming neighborhood. 6. Town Law §267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a renovated home while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Goehringer, seconded by Member Schneider, and duly carried,to GRANT, the variance as applied for, and shown on the site plan dated 2/22/11 and construction drawings labeled SK-14 dated 2/1/11, SK-15 & SK-16 dated 2/22/11 prepared by Garrett Strang,Architect. Any deviation from the survey,site pian and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit,and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions,or demolitions which are not shown on the applicant's diagrams or survey site maps,are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code,other than such uses,setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. o�. Page 3—May 18,2011 ZBA File#6462-Sweeney CTM: 1000-117-9-25 Vote of the Board. Ayes:Members Weisman (Chairperson), Horning, Goehringer, Dinizio, Schneider. This Resolution was duly adopted 5-0) Leslie Kanes Weisman,Ch 'rperson Approved for filing ,S /�� /2011 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Suffolk Times LEGAL NOTICESOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALSTHURSDAY, MARCH 4,2021 at 10:00 AMPUBLIC HEARINGSThis PUBLIC HEARING will be held virtually via the Zoom online platform, Pursuant to Executive Order 202.1 of New York Governor Andrew Cuomo in-person access by the public will not be permitted.The public will have access to view,listen and make comment during the meeting as it is happening via Zoom Webinar. Details about how to tune in and make comments during the meeting are on the Town's website agenda for this meeting which may be viewed at http://www.southoldtownny.gov/agendacenter. Additionally,there will be a link to the Zoom Webinar meeting at http://www.southoldtownny.gov/calendar.aspx.10:00 A.M.-JIM BRODSKY#7466-Request for a Variance from Article III,Section 280-15 and the Building Inspector's December 2,2020,Amended December 8,2020 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct an accessory garage in conjunction with a new single family dwelling;at 1)located In other than the code permitted rearyard;located at:1895 Pequash Avenue,Cutchogue,NY.SCTM No.1000-103-7-15.10:10 A.M.- VINCENT BERTAULT#7467-Request for Variances from Article III,Section 280-15;Article XXIII,Section 280-124;and the Building Inspector's October 22,Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling,and construct an in ground swimming pool;at 1)proposed additions located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet;2)the accessory swimming pool is located in other than the code permitted rear yard;located at:95 Navy Street,Orient,NY.SCTM No.1000-26-1-12.2.10:20 A.M.-VINCENT BERTAULT #7468SE-Applicant requests a Special Exception.under Article III,Section 280-136(13). The Applicant is owner of subject property requesting authorization to establish an Accessory Apartment in an existing accessory structure;at:95 Navy Street,Orient,:NY.SCTM#1000-26-1-12.2.10:30 A.M.-SAMUEL J. DIMEGLIO,JR. #7469-Request for Variances from Article XXIII,Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's November 17,2020,Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct a front porch addition attached to an existing single family dwelling;at 1)located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet;2)located less than the code required minimum combined side yard setback of 25 feet;located at:2280 Deep Hole Drive,(Adj.to Deep Hole Creek) Mattituck,NY.SCTM No.1000-123-4-6.10:40 A.M.-MICHAEL KREGER#7470-Request for a Variance from Article III,Section 280-13 and the Building Inspector's January 6,2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling; at 1)more than the code permitted maximum two and one-half(2-1/2)stories;located at:985 Bay Shore Road,(Adj.to Pipe's Creek)Greenport,NY,SCTM No.1000-53-3-13.1.10:50:A.M.-ROBERT AND DONNA DRUMMOND #7471-Request for Variances from Article III,Section 280-15;Article XXIII, Section 280-124;and the Building Inspector's December 16,2020,Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to legalize an"as built"deck addition with hot tub attached to a single family dwelling,and to legalize an"as built"accessory shed;at 1)"as built"deck is located less than the code required minimum side yard setback of 10 feet;2)"as built"shed is located in other than the code permitted rear yard;located at:675 Private Road#12,(Adj.to Corey Creek)Southold,NY.SCTM No. 1000-87-4-7.1:00 P.M.-COTTAGE ON THIRD,LLC#7472-Request for a Variance from Article XXIII, Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's January 13,2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct a new accessory pool house/garage;at 1)more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%;located at:850 Third Street,Greenport,NY,SCTM No.1000- 117-8-7.1:10 P.M.DAVID ZAPPULLA#7473-Request for Variances from Article XXIII,Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's December 23,2020,Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to demolish and reconstruct a new single-family dwelling;at 1)located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet;2) more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%;located at:810 Linnet Street,Greenport,NY.SCTM No. 1000-48-3-13.1:20 P.M.- JAMES AND LAURIE CARNEY #7474-Request for Variances from Article XXIII,Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's December 15,2020 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to 377e8c50-e53d-42ee-95fb-6d18cb3aafee kimf@southoldtownny.gov SOUTHOLD TOWN BD OF APPLS 370 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Suffolk Times construct additions-and alterations to existing single family dwelling;at 1)located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet;2)located less than the code required minimum rear yard setback of 35 feet;located at:No#Equestrian Avenue,Fishers Island,NY.SCTM No.1000-9-6- 3.1:30 P.M.,-CHRISTOPHER AND MARIAN BRIGGS#7477-Request for Variances from Article III,Section 280-15;Article XXIII,Section 280-124;and the Building Inspector's January 25,2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to legalize"as built"deck additions to an existing single family dwelling and to legalize an "as built"accessory shed;at 1)as built shed is located in other than the code permitted rear yard;2)as built deck is located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 40 feet;3)as built deck is located less than the code required minimum rear yard setback of 60 feet;located at:320 Oceanic Avenue,Fishers Island,NY.SCTM No.1000-9-7-9.1.1:40 P.M.- KONSTANTINOS DIAKOVASILIS#7465SE—(Adjourned from February 4,2021)Applicant requests a Special Exception under Article III,Section 280-13B(13). The Applicant Is owner of subject property requesting authorization to establish an Accessory Apartment in an existing accessory structure;at: 2095 Ruth Road,Mattituck,,NY.SCTM#1000-106.-7-6.1:50 P.M.-SUFFOLK COUNTY ENERGY STORAGE II,LLC#7463SE—(Adjourned from February 4,2021)Request for a Special Exception-pursuant to Article XV,Section 280-626(5),the applicant Is requesting permission to construct and allow for-public utility structures and uses;i.e.,battery energy storage system facility;located at 69430 Main Road(NYS Route 25),Greenport,NY SCTM No.1000-45-5-1.The Board of Appeals will hear all persons or their representatives,desiring to be heard at each hearing,and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for,review on The Town's Weblink/Laserflche under Zoning Board of Appeals(ZBA)\Board Actions\Pending. Click Link:http;//24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0. Contact our office at(631)765-1809,or by email:kimf@southoldtownny.govDpted: February 16,2021ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,LESLIE KANES WEISMAN,CHAIRPERSONBY:Kim E.Fuentes54375-Main Road(Office Location), P.O.Box 1179,Southold,NY 11971-0959 377e8c50-e53 d-42ee-95fb-6d 18cb3aafee kimf@southoldtownny.gov SOUTHOLD TOWN BD OF APPLS 371 ;M9y file -Is-r 11-vAFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Suffolk Times State of New York, County of,Suffolk, The undersigned is the authorized designee of Andrew Olsen,the publisher of The Suffolk Times,a Daily Newspaper published in Suffolk County,New York. I certify that the public notice,a printed copy of which is attached hereto,was printed and published in this newspaper on the follow!ng'dates: February 25,2021 This newspaper has been designated by the County Clerk of Suffolk County,as a newspaper of record in this county,and as such,is eligible to publish such notices. Signature Eliot T.Putnam Pfinted•Name - - Subscribed and sworn to before me, This_t1__day of ' 200, Nota- Signatu •, �y� i` � un:errhpr, S•I'.4TE "OF NES','YORK ' _ 7 :h0 ARF PUBLIC_: � 1 AL13 ANY j (ti OIRF6613,98443 TC Notary Public Stamp ��'�•,,�fiSS/p�EXy����.�,�`�`,` 377e8c50-e53d-42ee-95fb-6d18cb3aafee kimf@southoldtownny.gov SOUTHOLD TOWN BD OF APPLS 369 i� 'JI BOARD MEMBERS ®F so Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson y® 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 h® l0 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acamporat Office Location: Eric Dantes u' Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. ® aQ 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento ®U \� Southold,NY 11971 9 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809 -Fax(631)765-9064 LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, MARCH 4, 2021 PUBLIC HEARING Due to public health and safety concerns related to COVID-19, the Zoning Board of Appeals will not be meeting in-person. In accordance with the Governor's Executive Order 202.1, the MARCH 4, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting will be held via video conferencing, and a transcript will be provided at a later date. The public will have access to view, listen and make comment during the meeting as it is happening via Zoom. Details about how to tune in and make comments during the meeting are on the Town's website agenda for this meeting which may be viewed at http://www.southoldtownny.qov/agendacenter. Additionally, there will be a link to the Webinar Zoom meeting at http://www.southoldtownny.qov/calendar.aspx. If you do not have access to a computer or smartphone, there is an option to listen in via telephone. 1:00 P.M. - COTTAGE ON THIRD, LLC #7472 - Request for a Variance from Article XXIII, Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's January 13, 2021 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct a new accessory pool house/garage; at 1) more than the_,code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%; located at: 850 Third Street,'' 1V NY. SCTM No. 1000-117-8-7. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons or their representatives,desiring to be heard at each hearing,and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review on The Town's Weblink/Laserfiche under Zoning Board of Appeals(ZBA)\Board Actions\Pending. Click Link: http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0. If you have questions, please telephone our office at(631)765-1809, or by email:kimf@southoldtownny.gov Dated: February 18, 2020 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LESLIE KANES WEISMAN, CHAIRPERSON By: Kim E. Fuentes 54375 Main Road (Office Location) 53095 Main Road (Mailing/USPS) P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Town Hall Annex, 54375 NYS Route 25 p�q P.O.Box 1179 �- nY Southold,New York 11971-0959 Fax(631) 765-9064 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AL'�y DATE: February 1, 2021 RE: INSTRUCTIONS FOR PUBLIC HEARING The following policies are required by New York State Law Dear Applicant; Due to public health and safety concerns related to COVID-19, the Zoning Board of Appeals will not be meeting in-person. In accordance with the Governor's Executive Order 202.1, the MARCH 4, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals Regular Meeting will be held via video conferencing (Zoom Webinar), and a transcript will be provided at a later date. The public will have an opportunity to see and hear the meeting live, and make comments. . h xxy "dexo `r .� ksi ?'.y,..#. ktn; - v "`� .r"3's;.c ,f:-:P,,�.+;x. ac,: tv„c� �+. 4am t 1 !M`:•�: .�.�°` `, 2�'��(�(+�( �ti lµ £” .4 1. Yellow sign to post on your property a minimum of seven (7) days prior to your hearing, to be placed not more than 10 feet from the front property line (within your property) bordering the street. If you border more than one street or roadway, an extra sign is supplied for posting on both street frontages. Posting should be done no later than February 24, 2021. To avoid weather damage to your sign please affix it to a sturdv surface such as plywood. If your sign is damaged please call the office and we will provide you with another one. Prior to your public hearing, members of the Board of Appeals will each conduct a personal inspection of your property. If a Board member reports that there is no signage visibly on display as required by law, your scheduled hearing will be adiourned to a later date to ensure compliance with Chapter 55-1 (B) 1 of the Town Code. 2. SC Tax Map with property numbers. 3. Legal Notice of video conference meeting. Instructions for participation will follow, and will be posted on the Town's Website under the meeting date, and the Legal Notice section of Suffolk Times Newspaper. 4. Affidavits of Mailings and Posting to be completed by you, notarized, and returned to our office by February 25, 2021, verifying that you have properly mailed and posted. Please attach a photograph of the posting on your property with your affidavit of posting. 5. Instructions for Laserfiche/Weblink to view application. Instructions for ZBA Public Hei-_.2 Page 2 Please send by `} e _el Reikurri.` `eei : the following documents to all owners of property (tax map with property numbers enclosed) vacant or improved, which abuts and any property which is across from any public or private street. We ask that you send your mailings promptly so that if any piece is undeliverable, you can reach out to your neighbors to request their mailing addresses, and re-mail. Mailing to be done by February 19,2021. a. Legal Notice informing interested parties of meeting being conducted via video conferencing. (Enclosed) A WEBLINK to the meeting will be provided on the Town's Website under,the date of the meeting. b. Your Cover Letter which should include your contact information, date and time of hearing, procedures for submitting written comment via email or USPS to our office. Recipients should be able to contact you for additional information. Furthermore, if recipients need to contact the ZBA staff, they may telephone 631-765-1809 or email us at kimMsoutholdtownn . ov or elizabeth.sakarellos@town.southold.ny.us c. Instructions for Laserfiche/Weblink to view all pending applications. (Enclosed) Link to view pending applications: http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0. d. Survey or Site Plan depicting "as-built" and proposed improvements requiring ZBA relief. The Town's Laserfiche/Weblink files provides both location addresses and mailing addresses in their current Assessment Roll listing. (See Link Below). Also, the Town'Assessor's Office can be reached at 631-765-1937. Contact us via email or by phone if you need further assistance. TownOfSouthold>Assessors >Assessment Books/Tax Rolls > 2010-2019>2019 http://24.38.28.228:2040/weblink/O/doe/1022250/Pa eg l.aspx. .5 .« yr.� ..,` -s -*c..Srv�-_[•,,•�x , .. "-Y�5�`?�fi �n x ^^d d ,€y. �.A'•'`.:rx' ,�„?, - ix,�. ,u..,rf:,+.� ,-.taj:'-i -,y.:r*rc-�•,;.>'L?�..ik,,, ,�y Jai.;,.:' #�.K'- :.:'F>'€,'ai-^; ,,s +v -�S%s,', :''s�-Y'c•:. a'v.,:,�- .:'- ' t .Mw" r d;•�` .;ai,r ,�W ''„`�"kii; h`'4 1`46t.,aa ,• „�`v ,. .f,s',-;.�+' '�s•�'� J' 4s ,✓;,4 sz �„ c' �`"t .� �; ^'s m a„`d',- `>hk`�,}.r �*,,;,:s'•` �••,.^± ",�'r„ ,ax p � *.SS_ a;4ntw;r,��2`c" UM ±k'?,F �•�+.' - k� � - 4'cir'�� µ �` a1 �n t ,fir .id",Rs ,y'V5 `� ^Karl i-• R ux-'^�•k`� NV.:y..�, :'�X"Nn ',l f.,ub, 4:16'.'.i:4� ` � .SSS�i`w�'`'ea� �.?.'«:�+iri_.] +�r'SS �7�'"�^ ' ' " t"� J" �rw .•._°"��u. d+ f”'an'� 1�C; r 1 Y�'^ <}«`t d..J a"U _c .�.% :3:a a...... 4 :qi�•"��' �i+.�^G�w�``�'� 5:..h%" rr�, k r �''4"'J' „'k�:::i'-^Y'• '1=t:.; ��%' i ,v C' uz°a,, f;^ A �� - XM>�j ;s�,t:��ti. a^as. _- - =;�;-h.-s r�,�€sri,a s�'S:K"..,.�. '�_+=Vii:;., t' r„�ss'•H��;u�'��i;L _..3;• ;•' ns'r g�:;:- - "�' "'<< r;'��:'� `''"4- ':,,"•``°r"w,rn'-i£i *",�" of s"�e,t.:.`�-•�x:`f'°v:%" a`s-"'•.'z;.�„ .����;;�.. ;z''.i �^,3•"�s •�ra��^ t��s„'�;R>i;= ~*"r> ;"�'' 'i,�°�-•�� 11 � _ n -'-..,F;��c� `�`;��",h`a� ,�R,.3x f �z�"��',a ,,qqurs'7� �t,�,x,;;'ri�s2'- �c*,*" ..., .✓',t�aau^r:'r , eRR <`3.,�,4� �i "'y-' „_� ,F�4-�i�T. "F-+"-•i�'^µ.. ?'• Ye N• '. j S• ''S��`..'1,.�:`^�` Y�'4'�."y,e��' �,R -6Y �"'';a7T e,,r.;� •fir>•�:j.:�,�r,�7t o-��y�,•�,"uJ,:,r�,e�-�. ��,:a';""n ;L� '«'E�yy��, hE�ax r�-`r"�;`rrrc_,"':v� ":".;; .,"�F �,`A`Y:.a,�"`a,�„+,,?z��sh..�a.,vd`;�.t:,+ #;;C' t �.� .fi � o'.si�, .,`,' _�•nrs- '"''- ..€`i�:Frs,' ^,'�,`c�r`'s -Ri-,A „4`s ac',�'` - Please note that without your mailing receipts, the ZBA will be prevented from conducting your hearing,pursuant to Chapter 55 of the Southold Town Code and New York State Law. Please be reminded that New York State Law requires the ZBA to follow the above specific policies. If for any reason, you are unable to prepare for your public hearing as instructed, please let us know. Kim E. Fuentes Board Assistant • 55�„„,,�� t 5 t T OSWh OrF'L ; 4.wT 4 N r a ?t' 4 i +.x Yk{��},t y�ey Cllr - �t'a+ e' S �eY` � ��Y!'�.h. `r;arc .ts� [j�� ��'T/(/�] 1 ^v, .� .s+:. .-o, ou. Z 1 V'O k"' `y'" ., SQL i 4-x,z�' J 1;,+}''rea"-r��#`" n's✓'' .tG,'.n.rs.-> ��5, 3s AM s y S R NEN Y6 A K VI +.»* �n�txt s�� a� r �N K° } . c .r'�`i> "7"}._^�-��,?py�p >. • x� �'`�'.. �q MR. corrrrcr/ n :k _s_ vv � �US,,.��,t �.4,v+� ; � � a,-�. � t ,y. '��,n. �,. � ,�, �„i y� i;z '� �r `tE•' �i '�'�5. .v�.tsf�''�-s�'' q ''sn' kip WIN m pill kt,'+AS �", .,y},a�ys, °� � '.�'. �*_ Em r Fk..t �, YA.S.. 1 t `-cS.:^. i '.. ' `�tf .[`t`x'•,,Ay, r+ytic !K_ x �i'a� ��,,�,� i}"`c'r:nf �`�a�bb'�`-i� •••'���:#""+�x1"x� r r %`� - �#- "_�: t' *� s. AGO 0 of s, m =.i• r a .s fl — 0 9 0 • . r . 4. _ 4 - c _ Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files u Page 2 Lasertkhe Webunk m i t�eip 1` 4 !3?w ,.Home. Brame' Search'" "TownOf ilf id-ZoNr88aardbf4oak-aBAt _. • .s �i=,�.,. _ _ Zoning BoardofA eels +n8 PP (ZBA) MAphabeficat index 13 tasesfufie Search Guides ( Path 6leetlngSchedutes of Appeais 2P V ;• Mtnuteuagendas/legat NobcesMeanngs Creation date ,i MPendblg 71 OrIM tZ.tT.t6Ptv3 + .�i123fZOtJ1197:14 MA •4 �Speast Event Permlfs MZBAPoktles No metadati assigned {- V1 OwPftonsListCode2M1oCpl i i la jurisdiction Listing + [ "J 3 ZBA Boak of Mapped 1977 Existing lots - . 799 BUBc Schedules ...—_.._. g......_...._._._.._.....-Rgrewnenta CorNacts&Leases—.-.---V. i ( i Page 7 of t - f4 Entries Above: Listed are types of records under ZBA Folder. ZBA Decisions can be found under Board Actions. Click on "Board Actions"folder to open. yds.•q /wwy�_1 4.* "IR.a - - - 53?Y.aa:".�'M k'S'-.*x u4�r.`.">3."1W�s5"'-�'a'�as"d,s =:'�.¢:t-i�' + -4 - ��'� v;l.t . •y��` � a'"'rz� -,f-,��3*".'i'4 ss�".,{vuxx•-n �(f {+`� _ Hosiye. 1Brc +sech > tisififriaist B'zd', Sna ? �i?,g 4":je%; _ Pendin I } `` w♦�x�_i��} y e` L a'.} +�' •"�X�-''I 3`i.)SI�VFS.�It'�, Mv 4i-ti.4'�.:.+R./jN�C.i. v� 00 t 0 it Os P ta7lfct:Eev f r tIK' - - ---- --- - - ---- IrAff3i�if OXiM f i ' ��374REntt��DOfZ866 � _, — g � ( Glt3tt02G4�8 Ptai � ! #7383-SPil�er sUit,6.59^5•s.3 .- . #739456N Rs,lV4y' esa z- p roumt-'itlbY►=�id- ,A F;tteso dant Carr1 3 5' _ - - ' �X�SSEried';t000.54"1-1,3Y ? No metadata assigned #73W880Aaylr1ew Drive-LLC 7040-87:5-10.1 #73870ardtomer'1000,01-4=1 f f *7U77iard Comer-SITE PLAN--Arch Pfans 7000.61-4-1 �'#7388 FAfntor+lirev.FYust t0a0 128.2�0 i73898enft1000-77 S-t #7406;N2Ppa 1000 98 1-7.5 f Page t of 9 Above, Lists all Pending Applications under Board Actions/Pending URL Address, Link is http://24,38.28.228:2040/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0 Laserfiche Instructions *A(y ZBA Files Page 3 Laser`fiche WebUnk _ _ .y _ _ _____ __ bty WEbLt9k'I-flelpil,cAtptit`I-sigr+bilt�• .^Home' Bio3ise _search Trnm6fsouthol4i7.oning BoardofAjieals2BA1>Board Actions', - _ - _- �-^ L •�-- _-----=LL-''.=_' --;; Board Actions ------`! ( Name i Page count i' - "'^--'w'-"i ,.,l,>a"• M 1957.1979 ` r23 1980-1999 Path RD 2000 TostnMouthold¢oNng Board i i ---- --'------- ----- o( eats � _� �i 2001 APP QB.A)1BOaM Actiore �.,, creation date p n 2002 -- �a 7/102001122155 PM i M 2003 Last modified r - ---- -'---- ---• -- [2 2004 3IM01711.36ro7AM - M3 ---------- ---'------ - ------------------------- -- ----.._.----- -----------'------ I.r• "^-•-•cw;;r.•5,,-' ,.�'- ---2005-- —"----'-----'----------`----- --------------'------- X2006 00 No metadata assigriW ! 1 102 I. �3 200 &Results 2010 sLmrPeP'firk'.b+l >s.' 2011 2012 't R1 2013 (3 2014 j 2016 Pon - --T — — -- - - :c fwending o.,.a,..r, Above: Boaed`Actions are listed by year: Click folder to-open. All Special;Exception. applications that-require-Coordinated SEQRAAnalysis ate stored in'"Pending".', m ;:9,r As<ar41 To;x?�P, '!4e1?72d�no800raofMFsRdsf> MArtlors'r2ot3,-' - _ ?;'„�;>'...a `iii - - 2017 .__._,ii-,1�Mana” �1t Ev,6 ,j�•�:T- i�-`_ Beeae- >a> OnaAW- on � vam I awl sn oo.caan -- yApp.hQep+gm,a66 100+ +ao Oore.+nivm H.1Ma12aIT °i >eo9 • -_ -' - ---•- -- eovdAmam-'- --'. _-- ---'- Geel 7TIT 1 ro++ ss eaa.aanso0s 75 eovd,ssnore LM ®lou tie eoa.d.w0s N. dlV" ii u>o+a w eoa<asmon: rocs se O d.nw,a e9 D d-a I���>023 3•is eosmxe0m :0» 218 Oond�. - - ' uy ro2e 13 eovd uno+s 7= s3 Oos.d-- �J m29 3 e ,d.cVaO ' R'M,eei 1 oe,.M 4am. Above: See listed File Numbers. Click on file you are searching. Laserfiche Instructions ZBA Files Page 4 cashel , • - . __ , '_ - _ }', _ _ `II.µ __ =/t Above: In addition searching by file no.You can also use the above search tool by typing the name or title of the applicant. laserBcheMeb Ink; _ ; 'koyei Home -grratise Search Ir —.-_ Cu.Romue Search � Sort results v Rswrds Management Search "�� —J- 1 7016 1 nNtl name I Board Actions-83 page(s) Lchease field _ ,,,I Page count 83 Template name:Board Actions 1 'I Page 3_:Colin and Kristen Cashel PROPERTY LOCATION.162 Lowl rShingle Hill,Fisher_ Page 4. 19.2017 97016,Cashel SCrM No.1000.9.1.26 minimus approval to renes_. Page 5y 19.20171r70I&Cashd SCTM No IMO-9-1-26 GRANT.the variances as-. Searrhsema Page 9..COUN&KRISTEN CAMEL SECTION 009 BLOC_ Page 20.Thomas Ahlgren(Cashel).PO Boz 342 Fishers lsland.NY... ��—_-^-- !V Show more Information-. 11 yl :I 97018 Board Actions-56 page(s) Page moot 56 Template name.Board Actions Page 48_.730 A,M.-SOUN CASHEL AND Variances under Article ld—<ec6on ANN— Page 48..ance(s)KRISTEN CASHEL87O16-Request proposed trellis located In othertha... Showmore)nfonnation— Above: Shows you files that can be fouhd.using a phrase, name or title. br you can search by Tax Map No. (District, Block and Lot) using the format 1000-111.4-1. LaserficffeWeKink — - - - - ;: htjl4ebLlnl[hFfelp rg6o r l sq ✓-Home, Browse.-Search Tai OlSbathoii ZopingeoardofAppea)s(EBpJ;1l1;'fe5lNgenAaS/LggalNQlkCsdtlearings 4_'� f Mmutes/Agendas/Lega 'r Name �murt_r... F 7�rr'�. 1 Notices/Hearings ,. G,T 1957-1979 EntiyPidpen)e5" :) t 19aP1999 �_,.. -- -=- 12000,2009 - - J Path Tavn0fSoutho1dZodng Board < ft'�1- 20/0 of Appeals EM 2011 - i (ZMApMinuteVAgendas/Lega) NoOcesMeadngs ) M 2012 Creation date , tR 2013 7/10/2001 2:57.40 PM i 2074 ;a Last modified _ ED 2015 17J)612O1621514 PM 1 232016 Metada[a• 1 ea 2017 No metadata assgned i Pagel of 1 11 Enb I Above:Also, Minutes,Agendas, and Hearing Transcripts can be viewed. Las&fiche Instructions ZBA Files 1! Page 5 La;erflehe WebUnk - _ `, j iic6ut 1'rtetp t',ticui t Home"'-ar.Wse 'search` toT_YnQi ou?holdx;Zoning8 ald ofApP�a;s1ZHA)>Mriutest ndas/t_egai NaHeC++tledri s'a 2s717r, .'-.'� - 4� 2017 _.,..---'--'----------i- f Name zeXOtrosrzot7 7 26A-Otl09J2A17 Agenda 4 Path �..q za"110512017 Hearing 40 E TmvnGfSOutWdOon(ng Board CfA.ppeaiS C;, 01ZBArOVOMXH1 LN 3 ` 0p1A#nutestAgeatdasllegal { NOGOeslSiea11ng512017 �, Ek ZBA-011192017 2 a[�'ZBA-01!19/2017 Age;Wa 2 _I CreAtton date 1,. .. 1211612M62'15:14PM } L)ZBAA2l0212017 7 ' Last modMed i '(3 ZBA-0210=0t7Agenda a - -- - -------_ ----- - '--- i 6119IM74S.'69 PM Z k4=212017 Hearing -49 , ii Y ZBA-021022017 LN 3 ZB.A-07/7512017Agenda 3 V NO metadata assigned zap�m. ed"175Pa1 - 3 -- -s r ZaA4)3/02t2017 7 E)ZBA-03102=17Agenda 4 x 1 ZBAA3102=17 Hearing 65 fA Z8A-03 Wn017 LN 3 ! t 1 28A-041762017Agenda - 3 - ! i ZBA-OW1WW175Peda1 . 3 ZHA4VOW2017 5 _ i,� �ZBhMI06,Q017 Agenda 4 }'i t ZBA44/062017 Hearing 44 Above:,Agendas, Minutes and Transcripts are in chronological order. Revised 6/15/2020 i4CjTlk'. E U' F HEARIi4o' The following application will be heard by the Southold Town Board of Appeals VIA ZOOM WEBINAR - REFER TO ZBA EBSITE FOR AGENDA on h-ttiomm southoldtownny. gov . 'AME : COTTAGE ON THIRD , LLC # 7 ,472 CTM # mE 1 000- 1 1 7-8-7 ' VARIANCE : LOT COVERAGE F EQUESTo CONSTRUCT AN ACCESSORY POOL HOUSE C ATETHURSDAY, MARCH 4, 2021 1 :00 PM You may review the file(s) on the town ' s website under Town F1, ecords/Weblink: ZBA/ Board Actions/ Pending . IBA Office telephone (631 ) 765-1 809- - I � o ��51 Sakarellos, Elizabeth From: Michelle Roussan <mroussan28@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 12:26 PM To: Sakarellos, Elizabeth Subject: Variance#7472 RECEIMED Thank you for letting me know you have received this important email. MAR 0 2 2021 Michelle Roussan Zorning Board Ofq mroussan28@gmail.com ppeals 631 521 5375 Dear Members of the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals, I am writing to you about the variance application submitted for 850 Third Street,New Suffolk requesting to exceed the permitted lot coverage. I, as well as all of the adjacent neighbors and those in close proximity to this property, strongly object to the request and ask that you deny this variance. The new owners,whose identity is hidden behind a corporation name (Third Street Cottage, LLC)have previously requested a variance for the pool house structure and were denied. If the new owners clearly knew what they wanted to build from the start, then they should have shopped for a lot of appropriate size with reasonable setbacks. The new house built on the site already dominates the surroundings,with a pool in the backyard covering a significant portion of the lot and little room for sound buffering or privacy. The addition of a large second structure 15 feet tall and only 3 feet from from neighbors blocking light and airflow on two sides, is simply unacceptable. While it is not a legal requirement to do so, it is hard to understand how someone is trying to shoehorn such a large construction project into such a tiny space in a community like ours and wouldn't even attempt to talk things over with neighbors... which raises the concern that this house may not be a residence at all, but yet another short-term rental "party house" as several other properties in the immediate vicinity have become.New Suffolk as we know it is under assault,',being pushed by new outside money, COVID transplants, and real estate speculators. Given its proximity to the;Whitecap property on the corner of Fourth and Main -- an Air B&B nightmare regularly filled with loud, drunk, and obnoxious "guests" who break our town noise ordinances --we feel compelled to hedge against this possibility and ask that you curb the footprint of this project. Michelle Roussan 865 Second Street, New Suffolk NY 11956 Proximate property owners strongly opposed to this variance application: Garance Werthmuller 600 King Street, New Suffolk NY 11956 Ellen and Gil Goldstein 965 Second Street New Suffolk NY 11956 Anita and Keith Haber 16995 Main Street i New Suffolk NY 11956 Jackie and Andrew Uterano 17095 Main Street New Suffolk NY 11956 Joseph Mc Kay 16740 New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk NY 11956 Yvonne Boutges Duffy 1320 Fourth Street, New Suffolk NY 11956 Stephan Clarissa Roussan 415 Third Street, New Suffolk NY 11956 Susan and David Noonan, 150 King Street NewSuffolk N'y 11956 Doris Brautigan Robert Eisenstat 1305 Third Street, NewSuffolk NY 11956 Lucy and Angus Maitland 375 King Street, New Suffolk NY 11956 Michael and Shannon Simon 17130 Main Street, New Suffolk NY 11956 Joyce and Bob Barry, 7400 New Suffolk Avenue 305 King Street, New Suffolk NY 11956 Dominic and Kris Randolph 315 Fourth Street, New Suffolk NY 11956 Sent from my iPad Sent from my iPad Sent from my iPad Sent from my iPad 2 r i ATTENTION: This email came fron'�-u i external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. y 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT, OF , In the Matter of the Application of: MAILINGS (Name of Applicant/Owner) POQ S-, AV. . SCTMNo.,1000- (Address of Property) (Section,Block&Lot) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK 1, ( ) Owner, (/<) Agent � , � /�� ' � . �✓ ��, G residing at �B/ ��L sd✓ -� Wee<-- New York, being duly sworn, deposes and says that: On the _day of 20;?//, I personally mailed at the United States Post Office in ✓ � New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in Prepaid envelopes addressed to current property owners shown on the current assessment roll Verified from the official records on file with the Assessors, or( ) County Real Property Office, for every property which abuts and is across a public or private street, or vehicular right-of-way of record, surrounding the applicant's property. (Signat ) Sworn to before Me this LYNDSEY BARKER day of 20-2-11 NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK No,01BA6156676 Qualified in Suffolk County ary otlic) Commission Expires November 27,20 cl PLEASE list on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next - ---to-tfie-owner-names-and-addresses forwhich-notir,es-were-mailed ---- — All original USPS receipts and mailing confirmations to be submitted to the ZBA Office along with this form completed, signed and notarized. - Postal Postals Service ■ ® e o . TIMED o . C t` s. e '� Xpo�eSit Mill bn y. Er 111 Ln 1119.111.113 • , f t�1C Yg -� • ,01 e�ot�r 17Q C3 New Xep Certified Mail Fee 6�1 -1 c� cO Certified Mall Fee $� 60 cb Cr $ V F 0 (1 O- J s $ ��IF-OL - Q' Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add tee p nate)Er C'� i Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add fee � ate) Pry !!e ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ ''t I ' Q ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ `'' 'YdG' C ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ Postmark ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ $171 (J(J Postmark } C3 ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ F B Here E]Certified Mall Rastdcted Delivery $, $11 Aduk Signature Required $ LU � E:3 ❑Adult Signature Required $ $'�'I.�Jn— FFg �20'Z, O E]Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ - Z�Z� ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ O Postage 5 Q) .11 Postage $171.75 .fin $ $f1,7+ - �� �1 ..D Total Postage and F s ��( TotaIPostageandQgs,�(� 3 $ $x.211 $ ( C`- Sent NO /• !~ SentTo r9 / ! H '_______-•I, O , `" O SVeet an� No.,or PO box No. - ----- -------------------------- SVeerandA o.,o�,P BoxNo.��� [`- � — % S c ty,siaYe,z P+a` ". ------------ ----------- y ` �f/j 7 Postala TM ■ • ■TIFIED oRECEIPT' S , I-CE ly ..G e, ply e Ln ._ -. - •- - Y (abrVipt OT 6A L U .� S c ra Certified Mail Fee $3.60 -0956 � .16 Certfied Mail Fee $3.60 i p" $ pt 70 Q' $ date) !� fT 6 Services&Fees(check box,add tee Pt-Gr ate) _a If 179 E• Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee P(({ Extra1 '0�L Retum Receipt(h--PY) $ t 1 Q ❑Return Recelpt(hardcoPY) $ ' S� ❑ $ *' Q (re I 1_I t(( POSt 0 Ratum Receipt(electronic) `7 0 ❑ Return Receipt(electronic) $ $ ®) ❑ +t1 rift 1, O ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ d.�,!�-!7� C3 [3 Certified Mali Restricted Delivery $—` :� C3 []Adult Signature Required $ t ❑Adult Signature Required :p�_�n�.+�• ` y ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ ��•)� C3 Postage $1.7: vj b f p Postage $0.75 n,0 $ OR 1 O l Postage end Fees Postage and Fee O $ $7.'0 $ $ �I '2 [%- sCdy,ro �- d/1os57 � SentTo +✓�- Sl� --v------ --- L ------- _------ reedApNP� .,oO[] S �` ----- ---------------- ----------------------- taex S-ta-te-,Z-P Ctry - - � r ems' _.,•�— , COMPLETET14IS SECTIONCOMPLETE THIS SECTIONON 6ELIVERY r' ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Sig at e i ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X [3 Agent so that we can return the card to you. E3 Addressee &U ■ Attach this'card to the back of the mailpiece, Recei ed by(Printed Name) ate of elivery or on the front if space permits. r-4 f 1. Article Addressed to: Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Ye 3 _ ��( mm C�W/ M X� ,�III If YES,enter delivery address below: �IQo II I III II IIII II I III III I II I I I II I II I I I II III I III Mo 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mall Expresso ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MaIITM ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restrictedi ❑Certified Mail@ Delivery 1- 9590 9402 5869 0038 4104 73 ❑Certified Mal Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTM" 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label) ❑Signature Coniirmation _ — - ❑Insured Mail Restricted Delivery 017• '0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 8 6 0 5 6 6 ❑insured Mall Restricted Delivery (over$500) PS Form 3811,July 2 115 PSN 5530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt,' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT u OF In the Matter of the Application of: POSTING L SCTM No. 1000- (Name of Applicants) (Section, Block&Lot) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK residing at 3-XIS GA01'G�I/f, New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: I am the ( ) Owner or ( Agent for owner of the subject property On the day of , 20 Z%, I personally placed the Town's Official Poster on subject property located at: indicating the date of hearing and nature of application noted thereon, securely upon subject property, located ten (10) feet or closer from the street or right-of-Way(driveway entrance)facing the street or facing each street or right-of-way entrance,* and that; I hereby confirm that the Poster has remained in place for seven (7) days prior to the date of the subject hearing date,which hearing date was shown to be Owner/A Signature) Sworn to before me this Day of �&VqgA4 , 20 LYNDSEY BARKEPJ NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK No. 01 BA61�6676 -- Qualified-►n suffo+k C ttrrtq — Commission Expires November 27,20_0" * near the entrance or driveway entrance of property, as the area most visible to passerby Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Request for Varia -#7472 850 Third Street, New Suffolk, NY, SCTM# 1000-117.-8-7 Mailings List: New Suffolk Common School PO Box 111 New Suffolk, NY 11956 1000-117.-8-5 Garange Werthmuller Gil Goldstein PO Box 343 New Suffolk, NY 11956 1000-117.-8-6 Keith Haber Anita Haber 80 Warren Street New York, NY 10007 1000-117.-8-8 Michelle Roussan PO Box 245 New Suffolk, NY 11956 1000-117.-8-10 F �'� �.. moi\ / "'�' `a 4 .moi+.., '#�' ._, ._R USPS Tracking® ��� FAQs ' Track Another Package + LAY Tracking Number:70170660000099860597 Remove x Your item was delivered at 12:26 pm on February 19,2021 in NEW SUFFOLK,NY 11956. C✓Delivered February 19,2021 at 12:26 pm Delivered NEW SUFFOLK,NY 11956 Get Updates\o, Text&Email Updates u Tracking History u m Product Information CD CL Q n x See Less Can't find what you're looking for? Go to our FAQs section to find answers to your tracking questions. FAQs USPS Tracking® `' FAQs > Track Another Package ♦ Tracking Number:70170660000099860580 Remove x Your package is moving within the USPS network and is on track to be delivered to its final destination.It is currently in transit to the next facility. In-Transit February 25,2021 In Transit to Next Facility Get updates\/ Text&Email Updates u Tracking History u Product Information uCD a Cr x See Less Can't find what you're looking for? Go to our FAQs section to find answers to your tracking questions. FAQs /1`I 1--� USPS Tracking® �' � FAQs ' Track Another Package ♦ A/ A(k Tracking Number:70170660000099860573 Remove x Your item was delivered at 12:30 pm on February 19,2021 in NEW SUFFOLK,NY 11956. G Delivered February 19,2021 at 12:30 pm Delivered NEW SUFFOLK,NY 11956 Get Updates v Text&Email Updates u Tracking History u T Product Information a v 0 See Less Can't find what you're looking for? Go to our FAQs section to find answers to your tracking questions. FAQs USPS Tracking® ~' FAQs ) Track Another Package + Tracking Number:70170660000099860566 Remove x Your item was delivered at 1:47 pm on February 22,2021 in NEW SUFFOLK,NY 11956. C✓Delivered February 22,2021 at 1:47 pm Delivered NEW SUFFOLK,NY 11956 Get Updates u Text&Email Updates u Tracking History u Product Information v On CD a Q See Less Can't find what you're looking for? Go to our FAQs section to find answers to your tracking questions. FAQs 0 USPS Tracking' FAQs ' Track Another Package + Tracking Number: 70170660000099860573 Remove X Your item was delivered at 12:30 pm on February 19, 2021 in NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956. G Delivered February 19, 2021 at 12:30 pm Delivered NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 Get UpdatesCD u Q 0 Text& Email Updates u Tracking History February 19, 2021, 12:30 pm Delivered NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 Your item was delivered at 12:30 pm on February 19, 2021 in NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956. February 19, 2021, 7:56 am Available for Pickup NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 February 19, 2021, 7:54 am Arrived at Post Office NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 February 19, 2021, 12:59 am Departed USPS Regional Facility MID NY DISTRIBUTION CENTER February 18, 2021, 6:12 pm r Arrived at USPS Regional Facility MID NY DISTRIBUTION CENTER February 18, 2021, 10:56 am USPS in possession of item NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 Product Information u See Less m m Q Can't find what you're looking for? Go to our FAQs section to find answers to your tracking questions. FAQs -4 USPS Tracking' FAQs > Track Another Package + Tracking Number: 70170660000099860597 Remove X Your item was delivered at 12:26 pm on February 19, 2021 in NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956. G Delivered February 19, 2021 at 12:26 pm Delivered NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 m Get Updates m Q Cr M 0 Text & Email Updates u Tracking History February 19, 2021, 12:26 pm Delivered NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 Your item was delivered at 12:26 pm on February 19, 2021 in NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956. February 19, 2021, 8:16 am Available for Pickup NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 February 19, 2021, 8:16 am Arrived at Post Office NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 February 18, 2021, 10:34 pm Departed USPS Regional Facility MID NY DISTRIBUTION CENTER - February 18, 2021, 6:12 pm Arrived at USPS Regional Facility MID NY DISTRIBUTION CENTER February 18, 2021, 10:56 am USPS in possession of item NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 Product Information u See Less CD CD 0- Can't Can't find what you're looking for? Go to our FAQs section to find answers to your tracking questions. FAQs �l USPS Tracking° FAQs > Track Another Package + oAV Tracking Number: 70170660000099860566 Remove X Your item was delivered at 1:47 pm on,February 22, 2021 in NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956. OV Delivered February 22, 2021 at 1:47 pm Delivered NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 Get Updates u m Q v 0 Text & Email Updates u Tracking History. February 22, 2021, 1:47 pm Delivered NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 Your item was delivered at 1:47 pm on February 22, 2021 in NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956. February 19, 2021, 8:16 am Available for Pickup NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 February 19, 2021, 8:16 am Arrived at Post Office NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 February 18, 2021, 11:51 pm Departed USPS Regional Facility MID NY DISTRIBUTION CENTER ' February 18, 2021, 6:11 pm Arrived at USPS Regional Facility MID NY DISTRIBUTION CENTER February 18, 2021, 10:56 am USPS in possession of item NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 Product Information u See Less m CD m Q Can't find what you're looking for? Go to our FAQs section to find answers to your tracking questions. FAQs USPS Tracking' FAQs > Track Another Package + Tracking Number: 70170660000099860580 Remove X Your package is moving within the USPS network and is on track to be delivered to its final destination. It is currently in transit to the next facility. In-Transit March 2, 2021 In Transit to Next Facility Get Updates u m 0- Cr v n Text& Email Updates u Tracking History March 2, 2021 In Transit to Next Facility Your package is moving within the USPS network and is on track to be delivered to its final destination. It is currently in transit to the next facility. February 26, 2021, 9:59 am Departed USPS Regional Facility NEW YORK NY DISTRIBUTION CENTER February 20, 2021, 8:44 am Forwarded NEW YORK, NY February 19, 2021, 10:50 am Arrived at USPS Regional Facility NEW YORK NY DISTRIBUTION Gl V--1)ER February 18, 2021, 6:12 pm Arrived at USPS Regional Facility MID NY DISTRIBUTION CENTER February 18, 2021, 10:56 am USPS in possession of item NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 Product Information u See Less CD CD Q Can't find what you're looking for? Go to our FAQs section to find answers to your tracking questions. FAQs BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ��oF so Southold 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 h0 1p Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. • COQ 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento �ly�,oU Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 22, 2021 Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 Gary Steinfeld/West Creek Builders P. O. Box 256 - New Suffolk, NY 11956• - - - Re : ZBA Application #7472 Cottage on Third, LLC 850 Third Street, New Suffolk SCTM No. 1000-117-8-7 Dear Mr. Steinfeld, Transmitted for your records is a copy of the Board's March 18, 2021 Findings, Deliberations and Determination,the original of which was filed with the Town Clerk regarding the above variance application. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Sin ely, Ki E. entes Board Assistant Encl. cc: Building Department I I OI 4 c 5 A LINE I r --- R MATCH o .6s --_ --FOR PCL.NO. i - +' 'n ,a s x$ 7 SEE SEC.NO. 710-6-034 as C1/ i y 1.1A(c) 8 _ 3.1 Q/ti �� 1.1A(c),w Z u / TUTHILL m 1.9A(c) % u Z x RD. (50) y/y 3Y 10 a 20.1 20.2 "1 OCQ 42 a j Ci 71 8 O _ 19 fl + 1.3A 4.1 ,1 r 1.B1 12 2 O o aN 72 j ,♦• \y,• 13'w 8^ 17.4 FOR PCL.NO. leo m 1.tA(c) 1.1A(c) p s 3 �I SEE SEC.NO. �' a las a x 1°4 6 Q 116-03-001 14'w a % x 5 s K m 2.6A 1L' 17.3 E 8 11175 �6 7 4 ,w �7 s s 8. t 0an GEORGE IELSIE) RD. ,.s ,s6 O ,Inn a6 6 9 16 x 17 s aw 35 ;,25 v 14A(cl n 51.1 " ^ 18.7 w ,n aa. 1.7A 10' 18 R y 2.5A 162 34 CUTCHOGUE i C 18.6 14_ a3 s ss a 6 1s6 14.1 1.54(c) $ � 27 ' 'R 22 1.♦ rn 28 ' \� 7 a.a h 8b g r�13_ 20 s ® n - •x 29.1 \ 21.2 '0 50 @ w5 w �,1 HARBOR g 1B8 71m 12 1 a w ss 'a a '31 A a 2.2Alc) \ i 7.6A(cl \\�t'•Q$ d 1T 11 '25 S 26 27 xm. �.._-oF- M � a 44• _ V, ,u 3 a �,.. H°'°e CraeM a x i f x 2 IES ut B mn 47 z M IcsIpRL --. 2.290 v+ 46.4 46. I� 9 us a a06 34 8 10 33 S - 30 8 1.6A1c1 -a� FIe o n w ,ss 3' a 7 1 u SHER 31 $sR36 x X 3g X40 8 44 4 - sN t 2 3 1.6A1c) s" � � 34 xiz3 8 32w `,s. 57. 29 a :nm1. ORCHARD 22 x a_28 m +b 3 4A(c) 39 ssx 1'1 'ot t w In 172 ,w O �° �x4w a' tps sx'20 (11M24 x�V �•, 8 41 13.2 = 13.1 s 12 811.1 70 a ms �x,' C,Tw „° 26a, --I' 30 t 8.2 of s = tp O x 32 RD. iCOURO'S � � �W 9JFF4Lx =>,,.v's. 9 � i°° p tp Isa'1 x.. Q 17_ 119.3 79.1 w 20.2 C- 28.1 5'•Roao61' s"7m SD ST. ,+ r>. .°"m , -. j41 = 162 16.6 e n Z m° 31 KING 8. a 111 16 23 ,as 2.7A1c) r 5 w $ 1 s-<_ 28 xY 18.1 6 ,°,+ a 20.1 s 4 - smy`+r •,at• a y ss R$ 1 32.3 7 ,w 1.4A(c) •-� _ 27 •• t 6 X21 T00 ''` m' w t; ,m _t, N 142 ars 8 + 16.3 a- n .a32.2 32.1 C 2 -1 am. m ST. 16.5 $26.3 N- m 114 823 26.1 29 X30 v 1 6A _Ip D 14.2 '1F 164 1.11Ay 22 23 24 X26.5 w ' , _162s PEc4McATW w 13 1m n 2t a n s;p BEO Ip It "T7 12 4 j AT 35A1c) 41 1 �2, oAlc) T x 15� 19. 26 '3t N Z 14 -15. 79. sz I•' x-.i-A lL i /� _1T 20.2 A 22 ilk I vzk LJ_ p0 'EI, 1.31(c) \8 M^ n �2D W I .m 18.1 182 1-7-& 4 � --7124 X23 �-I 14.1 4 209 ,a w g 16 0 '� w _ as OA tS P.D. „ x it rn a 12 3 122 "� ,a 20.8 /.. v 15 z i-...�- � BA Y s_ ACONIC w 11.7 S- S� NOTICE su;�� COUNTY OF SUFFOLK L�2 MNNTENANCE,ALTERATION,SALE OR �'_ gs ._.` Real Property Tax Service Agency pSTR18UTION OF ANY PORTION OF THE l� SUFFOLK COUNTY TAA MAP IS PROHIBITED •�' County C6f11lf RIV�rRBitl,N Y 11901 --- WTHOUT NRI TTEN PERMISSION OF THE � ��yyy� pp FEET: I REAL PROPERTY TRK SERVICE AGENCY. � yi" I� J