Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
TR-9745A
Glenn Goldsmith,President *V sorry Town Hall Annex Michael J.Domino ,`O� ��� 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 John M.Bredemeyer III [ Southold,New York 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski G Q Telephone(631)765-1892 Greg Williams '�� �� Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Permit No.: 9745A Date of Receipt of Application: September 30, 2020 Applicant: Jeffrey R. Lemler & Anca Lemler SCTM#: 1000-104-10-6 Project Location: 320 Broadwaters Road, Cutchogue Date of Resolution/Issuance: November 18; 2020 ; Date of Expiration: November 18, 2022 'Reviewed by: A. Nicholas Krupski, Trustee Project Description: Create an 11'x80' beach area with sand and to plant native vegetation; all existing trees to remain; create a,100'x70' path from house to,dock using Long Island pea gravel.' Findings: The project meets all the•requirements,for issuance of an Administrative Permit set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The issuance of an Administrative Permit allows16r the operations as-indicated on-the-site�plan prepared by. . . Erich Urs Schoenenberger, RA, dated September 16, 2020 and'9tamped-appr6ved on November 18, 2020. Special Conditions:. None Inspections: Final Inspection. If the proposed activities do not meet the requirements for issuance of an Administrative Permit set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, a Wetland Permit will be required. This is not a determination from any other agency. Glenn Goldsmith, President Board of Trustees SAND NOTES REVISIONS 1-NO LANDSCAPE WORK IN CONTRACT NO. DESCRIPTIONS DATE 2-MAINTAIN AND PROTECT EXISTING ELECTRICAL LINE AND WATER LINE GRAVEL FROM HOUSE TO DOCK DURING CONSTRUCTION,ANY DAMAGES MUST BE REPAIRED 3-PAVING AROUND POOL NOT IN CONTRACT. NO PATIO WORK IN CONTRACT OTHER THAN WOOD DECKING 4D TWOOD CHIPS Co ........ " EXTING PLANTED AREA 0 DECK LONG ISLAND PEA GRAVEL ° *ALL EXISTING TREES ARE REMAINING V / N � *LANDSCAPE WORK BY OWNER M P �0 0� \ � P cul -4 _ -_ -_- /� -- - ------- ---- - --- _ O, -_ __ ____ ++ ; --- r ,- -��; - __ - - - _ - - + + ----7 - - - - ---_\ - --- --- - - - --_-_ =_Tr== _ ++++ ____ /--_ - _--_- -_-•\ PLANTING BEDS WITHIN ! --__-� _- _2 =__-__-_ + _ _ _ _ _ _- _-_ �-- -_:'\ CRUSHED OYSTER SHELL AREA - _ 1,,17_7_7___ + + 7-7---- -_ _ _-_ CONTAINED WITHLANDSCAPE EDGING / NATIVE PLANTS/VEGETATION NO CHANGE ` -_ - _ - r, _-_- -- _ + ++ _ - _- _ 4 ___- /-�- _ CIVIL ENGINEER = LONGISLAINDPEAGRAVEL _ _ - - + ---_+ ++ ___ - _ - BUSHES ALONG FENCE MECHANICAL ENGINEER _ + + 7 7- __ _-_-_-_-_- - - - - - = - �_-__ - -_ -_-_ -_- _____________ + -7'-7-7,---7-7-\----7- - - ---__- - t ELETRICAL ENGINEER Cy - -j_ _ - --'7-7-7-7-7 ++++ ____________ ___ - _- - - - y 4'0"GRAVEL PATH - __ - - -- ___--_ _ _____=___=_- +++ _____________ \ ___-- - - - - - __ CONTAINED WITH -- _ - - ' __-_-_-_ __ .__.- - - - - - _ �____ t LANDSCAPE EDGING /C .__ '� _ \ - +++ ______________� ___7 7 APPROVED � �-y _ _ -- --=--7 ___- + + ----=--------- ---- -- =-= --=--- -_ LANDSCAPE STEEL EDGE (�G� /�P ROVED BY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER / ♦ \_-\19 �` + +_ - + _______ - TO CONTAIN SAND AREA+ + --- - - - - - - - --- -7-7-7- ,7 +---7-7-7-7- ago TO\Nh3 OF SOUTHOLD Q) -_ __ -__--___=_ +++ -___-_-___ ---_ �� NDI/�i►1 M It I 2020 + + -_-_-_-_-_ _-_ _=_-�____ ___ _ _-_ NEW STONEWALL -- - - 181 North 11th Street,Ste.406 _�_____ ___ ______ ' ' Brooklyn, Y - --- - - ------------- + + - - - - - - - - - - /y (HALF HEIGHT OF EXISTING STONE WALL) i NewYork 11211 - - --- - - - --- - --- - - - - - -- + _ _ - _-- _ _ _-7---_ _-� a�- _\ .�„'� — t.(212)941-6494 - -_ _________________ + + -_________=- _==________ _____ __=_=_ :-�- architecture+design \ _ - - ------------ -------- + ---------------- --_-_-_- -_-_-_- — _ — -- \- _ _________ _ _____ _______ + + _-_-_-_-_-_-_---_-_- - \ All rights reserved. The above drawings, designs and ------------- + +__—_—_—_ — _ — —/ _ `� + + - - -_�_--- ideas embodied therein are the property of su 11; and - ------ -------------- + --_-_-_- -_ -=-- -'-7--_ '--=- shall not be copied, reproduced, disclosed - - _ _ p p to others or ___ _ _ - - -_ \ used in connection withany work other than the _-__-_ \ specified project for which they have been prepared, in _ _ _ _ _ _ _- _ _ _ _ \ whole or in part, without the prior written authorization \- - _ + + -_-__- ____-_ _ _ _- -_-_- \ ofsu11. c0 copyright sul1 2012 BUSHES ALONG FENCE l }J= ____ ____ ____.+ + + -_-_---_-_- ---------- ----- -- ------------- + \�-.__-_____- .�Q '/, '/, ' \ /, i EXISTING STONE WALL ---7---7- , J SHEET TITLE: ________________________ _ o -- - \ \ , ', ' ------ -- = --= p,� 5 , AREA OF SAND — _ _ �:___-__- , SITE PLAN- . 'EyAl NEWFIELD STONE WALL \ Pob�' DATE: 9.16.2020 -\ . . . �U Alq PROJECT NO:'t�'�SGHOE Cy/ DRAWING BY: a p° Ivo s �JRy CHK-BY: DWG-NO.: Z SEP 3 0 2020 UJ T-001 .00 CADO FILE No: 1 OF 7 Glenn Goldsmith, Pre r( ` ',nf �ag0FF0(��0 Town Hall Annex Michael J. Domino, Vice-P!:. ,Jent ,��� G��,q -_J 54375 Route 25 John,M. Bredemeyer III o '` P.O. Box 1179 A. Nicholas Krupski o Southold, NY 11971 Greg Williams y O� Telephone (631) 765-1892 ��l Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date/Time: t0 FAQ o0 Completed in field by: P' -n Erich Schoenenberger on behalf of JEFFREY R. LEMLER & ANCA LEMLER requests an Administrative application to create an 11'x80' beach area with sand and to plant native vegetation; all existing trees to remain; create a 100'x70' path from house to dock using Long Island pea gravel. Located: 320 Broadwaters Road, Cutchogue. SCTM#: 1000-104=10-6 CH. 275-3 - SETBACKS WETLAND BOUNDARY: Actual Footage or OK=q Setback Waiver Required 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 50 feet 3. Sanitary Leaching Pool (cesspool): 100 feet 4. Septic Tank: 75 feet 5. Swimming Pool and related structures: 50 feet 6. Landscaping or gardening: 50 feet 7. Placement of C&D material: 100 feet TOP OF BLUFF: 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 100 feet 3. Sanitary leaching pool (cesspool) 100 feet: 4. Swimming pool and related structures: 100 feet Public Notice of Hearing Card Posted: Y / N Ch. 275 / Ch. 111 SEQRA Type: I II Unlisted Action Type of Application: Pre-Submission Administrative Amendment Wetland Coastal Erosion Emergency Violation Non-Jurisdiction Survey <_ 5 years: Y/N Wetland Line by: C.E.H.A. Line Additional information/suggested modifications/conditions/need for outside - review/consultant/application completeness/comments/standards: l I have read & acknowledged the foregoing Trustees comments: Agent/Owner: Present were: J. Bredemeyer M. Domino G. Goldsmith N. Krupski G. Williams Other mss,-�'rr.,r .•Lrm,�Wn - "nw— � ' r�.^•' ;`/ ��!' �`f p� •e�a `@� MWE Y •2d 2�r /'���M�b i \; • y w r t� �ay�ar+,,a'77. y��y-. A• rc-,`� A ., �` 3r � „"r' -*•t' �y. �.' � 1�iYr", d��RR,�}.� °� - yes. �` ". F�+�. J�''�.�q - v,y �° '♦ �.s. - +9 A ..ea �: 1 ,�� Y "' ql.� �•}tir F.. �r� h1� ,,.,� y k •• � G f� «.'.�,, ,1 � ` � I d���uny� �• ��;� v s k r, t= i�wMYn. �S ss <„1 i a Fs a i 9 1C n y�i�1a 'q bks X Y ♦ �. ti a �r ���y".9a �� ��� t m �� � f �4{�fy,�g�P r s` I, - ( z"gM"ydp +r 4 iiE s e r^ 14h l6 z e ^+g•4� ° t a►� _ • _ • ,��! - ' ; ♦ J , rte lm \ Y, - n �._ _ ♦ ...,, int,. '�°4.- � .• s�" "C�``iiii��iiiii aL1���� a -rS�� �.��J(� � s4 Ay ; • .. l s• '�u�� a ", •'.ALL ! 1 F WAI if as WA w • - - � yy4 .• d Y e In<� \ O��\ k � t � `� bA tg ol..q ✓^' 0 P A e ^ C i . e eo a :. • : , , ,. a .. . eoeeoee , :. eo a eo e f 1 � ... � �.,_•o eeeeoeeoeoeee , :. e , ee � e• , . neo ,, SCDHS REF# R10-17-0008 SU.R VE Y OF PROPERTY ---- AT .NASSAU POINT ` TOWN OF SCJ UTHOL.D SEP 3 0 2020 SUFFOLK V l' O L1.11TT Y, N. Y. _ _. ...., 4 1006 164--10-06 C 0ySCALE: V-- 40' 0 � JUNE 10, 2013 � SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 (B.O.H.) NOVEMBER 28, 20116 (REVISIONS) 7094' NOVEMBER 30, 2016 (REVISIONS) Nss"a9'as"E . APRIL 27, 2017 STAKEOUT MHWM_ r�HwM. IE LINE MAY 11, 2017 (FOUNDATION LOCA TION) COR CMF JULY 20 2018 (FINAL) 5.4"E• FECOR. X!-x7-_x _N—cL—x_—_ �_�,` AUGUST 28, 2018 (SANITARY LOC.) - ~� A>~ {e1.6),_-=- " FEBRUARY 25, 2019 (FINAL) ZONE: SEPTEMBER 17, 2019 (PROPOSED ADD!770N) OCTOBER 22, 2019 (PROPOSED ADDI TION) x � �wW ZONE X I o w O x� sANm O `U GRAVEL S.4' t PATH t`'� lx N` 101 SNONE SHEDS 1 PROPOSED 2 15.1 QPM ;' Z 1 l r STY. ADDMON. ,,,( �2 1 FF=16.1" o �� 1'.�L Y COTTAGE 1 RELOCATE Ow `` p yw 8 7 1 WITH EXWNG DRYWELL PRG , a p¢ z SEPTIC r PROP. 9.9. X bECx 2 i DECK CE 7's EL- DE Co eKW v�h t EL-27.FE.GOR .0 n 9`v DE i 16'F- DECK �a 17,0' 4' S (d bw 2 STY Fri 1 HOUSE + FFo DUNITS x'16 1 15. .EL. 18.27 SEPTIC LOCATION 13' 16.4'1 i "As .B, +f 407.( I 0.3 ;15.9. 7.31jn 'g• ,'GATE ST 19' 20' `"� w 1 PROPANE ri N 03.7 20.3' 1 ' '4C',q�r c••�1 /� 1 µ1D LOTl Lm 53' 56' ! �, / METAL oAPPRO* AREA LP2 s2' } � COYER � f�-•�l 1 53' � j 1 �\�. / t zf RCA Ln N OF st P�c `t 15.2, DRIVEWA 1EST v a GENERATOR HOLE 8.18.4' 1 a WELL y f ELECTRICAL UKKN01'Rd j METER j l UTILITY l 1 POLES 1 CO11C. l 1 l M'ALt. � t I ' 5ECK 1 1 - cop i 1 24-1 4_1- -- ----- ` 8? % •' C � c0r 6gar 1 Nc QD ` 1 `Y '3 6 BGc��yc ' n j 1 11-141. 1 f (k !'logo�� i A�1 LOT s REFER TO "AMENDED MAP OF NASSAU POINT, / OWNED BY NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES, INC." FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE ON AUG.16, 1922, AS MAP NO. 156 f 9 0 = WELL (S) = TEST HOLE 19 = SPOT ELEVA77ON ■ = MONUMENT TEST HOLE DATA McDONALD GEOSCIENCE 8/31/2016 FLOOD ZONES FROM FIRM. NUMBER 361030164H EL. 18' 0 SEPT. 25, 2009 ELEVA77ONS & CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCED TO NAVD 88 BROWN SILTY SAND SM aF NLtt s- A-REA = 38,567 SO. FT. ---- 16' BROWN FINE SAND SP (To Tie flee) - ...,..... 17' T1 CER77nED TO ANY ALTERATTON OR ADD177ON TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION JEFTERY R. LEMLER AND ANCA LEMLER OF SECTION 7209OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCA77ON LAW. WATER IN BROWN FINE SAND SP CHICAGO G 7 �INSSE URANCE N.A. ,LL EXCEPT AS PER SECTION 7209-SUBDIVISION 2. ALL CERTIFYCA77ONS LIC. NO. 49618r S, HEREON ARE VALID FOR THIS MAP AND COPIES, THEREOF ONLY IF 23' P.C. SAID MAP OR COPIES BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR NOTE: WATER ENCOUNTERED 17' BELOW SURFACE O FAX (SX) 765-1797 KHOSE SIGNATURE APPEARS HEREON. 348' TO NASSAU PT. RD. P.O. OX•go- -1230 7RAVELER STREET SOUTHO , N.Y. 11971 L -L2-165 M1 w Ln7LE Ib CREEKLD.11 b P W ' ,f o141t ,. P � ts. _.--_� �Or to go M9 02 ry4 T ,4 f w P 4 arc,\:• 4 4 14 4 10 © \ \ y4µ\ \ \ 7- It \e � BROADWATERS COVE \ n 0 a.btuIt es \'a9' , TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �. as • e? O -R '' \e \ \2 \' �a imva�.w to ° '� \O P 12 a O � ,..Ara &< 12 l f 2TA(a 9 Al q, (9 5 '• PO i Pe P * ^ \e ° P O ,. HAyWATER COVE � o d�N' � w�O fi19 3 i°04 p "i3 d' �� B w• 9 J` It 1 15 9 ut "O $ l� ,ow ov �U7l10L0 SECTION NO COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © K a NOTICEY _ _ ,,-- ,..•. --�-- � µ,� P., 4P Real Property Tax Service Agency a w>�� 104 L (2,) w O owu. ----- u.,.w--w-- aufcauccPw^ roAnon ovmo�wre0 A N a•rwc,rro 7000 MAP •r++..�w+ewu P PROPERT,' O...Wuu, __—___ u,... __-- P..,u. --•-- •"°" —•-- w,nafrw•,rvcroA•earios,•E .. --. or m �� ;,�. '°"'� w..m..0 aemAOEntt mwseax mera�e N ... a w. u1Hm•au u. ___ o.uu. --•-- _..__ Board of Trustees 21 December 11, 2019 to Deep Hole Creek. The cumulative impact includes potential adverse impact to water quality from dock construction, operation of the vessel and cleaning vessels with chemical cleaners entertaining the water body. And also private dock structures extending into the public trust lands and waters obstruct pubic use in the area where the dock is located and does not meet this policy. , The Conservation Advisory Council resolved to support the application using best management practices, installation of gutters, leaders and drywells and non-disturbance area landward of the shoreline. The Trustees conducted a field inspection on December 4th, noting that it was basically straightforward and that there was 30 or more inches of water at the proposed float. Is there anyone here that wishes to speak regarding this application? MR. HERRMANN: Good evening. Rob Herrmann of En-Consultants on behalf of the applicant. It is a very straightforward dock application. There is, as you saw in your site inspection, a series of floating docks that are present on the property now, that would be removed, and replaced with a catwalk, ramp and float, which would be situated entirely in 30 inches of water. If the Board has any questions, I can answer them. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: How about a buffer on this project? MR. HERRMANN: Typically the Board doesn't require non-turf buffers for dock applications. There really is no connection between the proposed dock and a non-turf buffer. I do expect that there will probably be renovations proposed in the future on the house, at which time we would propose, and I'm sure the Board would require, an appropriate buffer. TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: Anyone else here wishing to speak regarding this application? (Negative response). Any questions or comments from the Board? (Negative response). Hearing none, I make a motion to close this hearing. TRUSTEE WILLIAMS: Second. TRUSTEE DOMINO: All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE GOLDSMITH: 1 make a motion to approve this application as submitted, noting there is an existing dock already there and it's just a replacement, which would bring it into consistency with the LWRP. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: Second. TRUSTEE DOMINO: All in favor? (ALL AYES). MR. HERRMANN: Thank you. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Number seven, SU11 Architecture + Design on behalf of JEFFREY&ANCA LEMLER requests a Wetland Permit to install a new sand beach area on top of existing ground in a r Board of Trustees 22 December 11, 2019 25'x70' area and the sand filling will be 6" to 12", no deeper than 12"; the sand will be "Cemex, ARB Certified, washed/cleaned/kin dried" or similar brand that complies with this characteristic, approximately 50 cubic yards of sand will be needed; install a border of landscaping boulders that will be set to separate the current existing beach area from the new proposed beach area; 50 linear feet of stones will be needed; on the inland side of the proposed beach area steel garden edging will separate the laridscape from the beach area; general cosmetic landscape improvements are proposed: Additional native vegetation will be planted (26 medium shrubs and 40 small shrubs and plants approximately); all existing trees to remain; a new approximately 6'x60' gravel path is proposed from the beach area to the house which will be contained with flexible steel', gardening edges, as well as steps needed along the path and changes in height; approximately 4 cubic yards of gravel will be needed; areas of wood chips are proposed along the property lot line and around planting areas, approximately 9 cubic yards of wood chips will be needed; no structures need to be erected on site for this work, the sand will be deposited with a small bobcat; all material and plants will be locally sourced at a local landscaping installer who will execute and supervise the work. Located: 320 Broadwaters Road, Cutchogue. SCTM# 1000-104-10-6 The Trustees most recently visited this location on the 4th of December. The notes are as follows: Multiple trees removed without permit. Fence does not comply with Trustees as per habitat fragmentation.We need to see a side elevation of stone wall. Stone needs to be specified.And concerns that sand migration into wetlands. And again, habitat fragmentation. The LWRP coordinator found this application to be consistent. The Conservation Advisory Council resolved to not support the application. The Conservation Advisory Council does not support the application, there is a concern with the compliance of the chain-link fence and the potential negative impacts the placement of sand could have on the ecosystem. Is there anyone here that wishes to speak regarding this application? MS. MORENO: Hi, my name is Maia Muniz Moreno. So there is no sand replacement in the proposal. We are adding sand. There is, next to the water is an existing beach, and we are adding, like extending that part.We are not excavating. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: So I know the Board recognizes you are not replacing sand. But this particular location is, I mean it's a creek. Its not bay front with a beach.And typically this Board is not in the habit of creating a beach, especially within, you know, important environmental areas such as Broadwaters Cove. I don't know if the Board has any other comments from the inspection there. MS. MORENO: Is the Board concern the sand washes into the water? Is that the main concern? Because there is already sand by the Board of Trustees 23 December 11, 2019 water.We are not-- TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: The concern is that sand liberated toward the beach in that fashion is going to cover emergent wetland plants, that plants in that area in the summertime is various small phorb types of wetland vegetation which will be damaged and possibly destroyed, that certainly there are known consequences. MS. MORENO: Yes. And with this boulders and stone wall that we are creating, isn't that enough to hold sand and not, that's the idea,of the stone there. TRUSTEE WILLIAMS: The concern with putting the stone there is then it creates a habitat fragmentation.The native animals to the area won't be able to traverse the stone, as they already can't traverse the not-allowed fence that is there.We would like to see that fixed. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: The neighboring properties at that end of the creek are characterized by very shallow slopes, naturally vegetated and a natural evolution of vegetation to high marsh, and the properties on either side already have significant high marsh that this kind of alteration will prevent the high marsh from coming back into that area, which is most appropriate. It's a trap for nutrients coming off lawn areas as well as it provides vital habitat, as previously discussed by Trustee Williams. MS. MORENO: Okay, I understand. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: My inclination, and I'm just speaking as one Trustee, if you were to want to create a sand area, I can't call it a beach because we are essentially trying to put an artificial beach in an otherwise ecologically sensitive marsh habitat, it would have to be much further up to the house. As opposed to lawn, beach, water, if we are going to do that it would be house, beach, and then natural habitat, possibly a large non-disturbance or non-turf buffer. MS. MORENO: Okay, understood. And the chainlink fence that is existing, we didn't do that. It's there. So I'm going to look at it. You are saying it's not-- TRUSTEE KRUPSKI:We would typically n'ot issue a permit for any closed-type fence that close to the wetland, to allow for movement of different species as well as, you know, accounting for sea level rise, as the wetland sort of marches inland. MS. MORENO: Okay. And the gravel pad and native vegetation, that part of landscaping is approved? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: It would be a four-foot gravel path down to the water, yes, the Trustees typically allow for a four-foot natural path. So that would be acceptable. MS. MORENO: Okay. I don't know if at this time, do you want take our comments back to your client and come up with a new option? MS. MORENO: Yes, that's probably what we want to do. Otherwise we could amend this. But I think we would rather, we have a lot of changes to do.,So we would rather-- TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Right. So at your request we can table this for the following month. Board of Trustees 24 December 11, 2019 MS. MORENO: Yes TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: And just another comment based off the inspection. There were several trees removed on the site and we do, everything within 100 feet requires a permit otherwise violations can be issued. So that would have to -- MS. MORENO: I'll look at that. I don't know when or who did that. But I'll ask the owner about it. TRUSTEE WILLIAMS: They were removed during the house construction, which was very recent. MS. MORENO: Okay. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone else who wishes to speak regarding this application? (Negative response). TRUSTEE WILLIAMS: Gail, I see you just walked in. Are you here for this application? MS.WICKHAM: What is the name? TRUSTEE WILLIAMS: Lemler. MS.WICKHAM: Yes. Good evening, I'm Abigail Wickham, Wickham, Bressler&Geasa, 13015 Main Road, Mattituck, New York. I'm appearing as attorney for the adjoining owners to the west, AGM Associates, Inc. My client could not be here tonight because they are away until Friday, so they asked me-to appear for them. They don't like to be in a position of having poor neighbor relations, but the application before you is, really compels, I think, a response. The proposed beach-is admittedly so they can have a sandy beach on their property, and that is just not compatible with the shorefront of Broadwaters Cove, specifically this section. We are concerned about the change of grade from the street, all the way down to the road, at least 25 feet, change of elevation down to the shoreline, as well as the change of grade from the properties across the street, across the road and down. Its going to create, as it has already on the property, a washout on to the shore. The possibility of storm surge, which is quite likely at that low elevation where the beach will be, is going to scour out and put sand into the creek. I don't care what kind of retaining they may have in front of it.We are concerned about scouring from the rock revetment that will be in the front. And we are also concerned about water creating the runoff and the surge creating water entering our client's property and bringing with it sand. That is going to be devastating to their property, because they have a naturalized shore frontage with all native plantings, exactly as this property has always been, and most of these properties were originally in: We think it will have an adverse effect on, when you have sand washing in, and this designed, as I understand it, it's not sand. It's Cemex, a Mexican product,which not naturalized material, natural local material as the application tends to emphasize. And.there has also been a lot of vegetation including mature trees removed, which has further exacerbated the problem of runoff into the creek, and we think that should be restored. Board of Trustees 25 December 11, 2019 Because while sand can be a buffer area, they are not asking for a buffer area, they are asking for a beach.And sand, when you have it behind an elevated bulkhead and it settles down, it will be a buffer and filter. Where you have it'here, very close to the water, the creek edge and the creek elevation, and you get a big tide surge coming in or a big runoff and rain coming down, which we have seen a bit of lately, I'm very concerned it puts extra sand into the water, creating not only a different habitat in the water but also increasing the water depth, which is not good for boating. And many of these properties including this one, have a dock. Its a very--a friend of mine who does a lot of shellfishing said there is a very prolific shoreline for shellfish, so we would be concerned that might be impacted as well. There are also a number of inconsistencies in the proposal. So is the Board still considering making a decision tonight or closing hearing? Rather than prolong it? TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Prior to you entering, we were headed toward tabling at the request of the applicant this evening for a revision of plans. MS.WICKHAM: Okay. Then what I would like to do then is rather than continue,just submit my paperwork that I have here for the record. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Please do. MS.WICKHAM: And I would be glad to do that right now. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: We can review that at the next work session. MS. WICKHAM: Liz, if you would like me to e-mail it to you so you can circulate it to the Board. MS. CANTRELL: Either/or. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone else here that wishes to speak regarding this application? (Negative response). Just in brief summary, the Board takes issue with creating a beach area so close to a natural wetland area, especially in a very sensitive creek eco-system. Especially, as Trustee Williams pointed out, where we are looking to close off a small section in the future for a shellfish nursery,.essentially, to try to revitalize the clams and essentially oysters and other bivalves and mollusks in that area. So this is a really important place and not some place we want to take lightly any decision. So myself, I would recommend talking to your client and pulling back and maybe creating a natural buffer not to be touched, whether it's non-turf or non-disturbance between any basically useable area and the creek, which is the four-foot footpath through, which is pretty standard for that area. MS. MORENO: Okay. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI;-I make a motion to table this application. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: Second. TRUSTEE DOMINO: All in favor? (ALL AYES). SCDHS REF# RI0-17-0008 PROPOSED HOUSE SEP71C SYSTEM CROSS SEC77ON SURVEY OF PROPERTY FIN. FLR. EL.18.1' FINISH GRADE i AT NASSAU POINT EL.16.5' ,' i�i .,`i �I. Y EL.20.0' I J LE z' min. S e,pp TOWN OF SD UTHOLD EL.15.0 fi EP 3 2020 1O I.E. ST 2 CHIMNEY § EL.14.7' EL.114.2' DOME 8'0 I.E. a� � � � --- �' �• -� o�y�, SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. IMI 3' SAND 0 � 3' SAND o S 1000-104-10-06 COLLAR '0 COLLAR M 8'0 SCALE: 1�= 40' EL.8.0' JUNE 10, 2013 6' 70.94'' SEP TEMBER 28, 2016 B.O.H. SAND sw MH N86'09'06"E — ( ) DIG DOWN 8'0 WM. — MH NOVEMBER 28, 2016 (REVISIONS) TO SAND (SP) & IE LINE '^'"� NOVEMBER 30, 2016 (REVISIONS) BACKFILL WITH SAND (SW) SAND CMF FE.COR. APRIL 27, 2017 STAKEOUT EA1.0' 5.4"E. FE.E__ MAY 11, 2017 (FOUNDA TION LOCA TION) SAND SAND SP x X—X C —��(—X— _3,7�_�\ HIGHEST EXPECTE WATER SP �� 7 JULY 20 2018 (FINAL) ZONE AE (e1.6)�,-'' x AUGUST 28, 2018 (SANITARY LOC.) SEP77C SYSTEM = FEBRUARY 25, 2019 (FINAL) 3 BEDROOMS .., w 1w 0Z ZONE X i 1-PRECAST 1000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK 9 LOT 183 2-8' LEACHING POOLS 6 DEEP WITH 3' SAND COLLAR 3' MIN. ABOVE GROUND WATER NU a' I i x IA \\ SHEDS -WALL. 1.� I ,1Z' ��� RAIN RUNOFF CONTAINMENT W12.9I HOUSE = 21,75 sq.ft. z \\ �'� ,�O 0 1 I 21,75 x 1 x 0.17 = 370 cu.ft. z --12 QQ. 34 Z'2 DRIVEWAY (PERVIOUS) = 4,832 sq.ft. _ Poo[ Y �, I COTTAGE 1 4832 x 0.8 x 0.17 = 657 cu.ft. v Dw 8 2 1 WITH I 1072 -- a z SEPTIC 1072/42.2 = 25.4 VF 1 z 1 PROVIDE (4) DRYWELLS 8'0 x 6' DEEP ' CE 7'8 DECK _ GOVERED OR EQUAL FE941 DECK 1' L6E. / X 20.4' 1 io (o v 17.0' DW 1 15.0' I �. 2 STY. FR I Dw HOUSE o ouNITS \16 M•� F F.EL 18.27 SEP11 � C LOCATION ' • 18.4 o. _ 1 I VAS .B■ ' COT�8 ' ' 15.9. 7.3-jr) 'B' 4'GATE I 13.r 2o.s' ST 19' 20' V ¢ w 1 1 qC U 0 'A' MID LOTLpi I UC APPROX. AREA 53' 56' 1 T L_I PROPAN COVER o I LP2 53' S2' RCAN N I of SEPTIC r� 152,3 DRIVEWA TEST P 1 ' GENERATOR HOLE 8.1' 8.4' o 1 I ' I LA LP1 LP2 VIELL 3 SHED 1 UNKNOWN 1 ELECTRICAL I � MmEmrT I m I I I POLES / 1 I i :1E.CK 40". 1 T O I co 0 40T I ---24- 2 \ a 1 O•i�`7 i. I 3 ocgP H� F�F �F:' � 1 OD I b �O SFR O 1 1�� I y trA D 1 GB tis Gtio� �F cu 60 G��yq ��s3��a �j��\�\`\�� D I I O G I ;u 1 I b O Fr, D I I OQ��Y I F��s sSE; I 1 ' 1 I I 1 � �AUe4D i LOT O s REFER TO "AMENDED MAP OF NASSAU POINT, / OWNED BY NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES, INC." i FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE ON AUG.16, 1922, AS MAP NO. 156 x o ��Hc �t ® = WELL ® = TEST HOLE 0 = SPOT ELEVA nON N = MONUMENT = PROPOSED CONTOUR TEST HOLE DATA McDONALD GEOSC/ENCE 8/31/2016 FLOOD ZONES FROM FIRM. NUMBER 36103CO164H EL. 18' 0 SEPT. 25, 2009 ELEVATIONS & CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCED TO NAVD 88 BROWN SILTY SAND SM �" OF/~"El"/ AREA = 38,567 SQ. FT. --- 16' BROWN FINE SAND SP (To Tie line) _ 17 cERnFIED TO LEMLER AND ANCA LEMLER ANY AL TERA nON OR ADDI nON TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLA TION ✓EFFERY R. OF SECTION 72090E THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCAnON LAW. WATER IN BROWN FINE SAND SP CHICAGO 777LE INSURANCE SERWCES,LLC. `wFy� N.A. <w..,.....,`,...I�� �V.Y.S. LIC. NO. 49618 EXCEPT AS PER SECTION 7209-SUBDIVISION Z ALL CERTIFICATIONS JPMORGAN CHASE BANK 'SURIiEYORS HEREON ARE VALID FOR THIS MAP AND COPIES THEREOFF ONLY 23' PECONIC'_ , P.C. SAID MAP OR COP/ES BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR NOTE. WATER ENCOUNTERED 17' BELOW SURFACE (631) 765-5020 FAX (631) 765-1797 WHOSE SIGNATURE APPEARS HEREON. 348' TO NASSAU PT. RD. I.0 BOX 909 SOUTHSTREETAVELER D, N.Y. 11971 12-165 DiSalvo, Diane From: DiSalvo, Diane Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2020 9:01 AM To: Krupski, Nick Subject: Lemler- 320 Broadwaters Road Attachments: Lemler.pdf See attached transcript of minutes from this meeting held on December 11,2019 for you to review. As you can see the application was tabled. The agent, Eric Schoenenberger had called me on January 29, 2020—he was going to get back to us to advise whether he was going to submit revised plans or withdraw the application. He did neither. We have now received an Administrative application for work to be done along with plans, etc. I have left this with the "old" file for you to review. His"new" project description is still proposing a beach area 11'x80'with native vegetation, all existing trees to remain, a gravel path from house to the dock, using pea gravel (100'00"). When you come in please review and advise. And also note—should we accept this new project description and plans on behalf of the original Wetland application so that this is a public hearing— or can it be handled Administratively and in that event the agent should formally withdraw the original Wetland application. p'bam,e D�Sa Ivo 5ou.thoL� Towv,Trustees 54375T2oute 25 I>.0. 1179 Soutl aol, N`( 1197:L (�31) j X51892 OX lam- Glenn Goldsmith,President 0 soU�� Town Han Annex Michael J.Domino,Vice-President ;`O ���, 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 John M.Bredemeyer III = Southold,New York 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski a� <v @ Telephone(631)765-1892 Greg Williams ® Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD This Section For Office Use Only i '3 Coastal Erosion Permit Application r - N Wetland Permit Application 1 Administrative Permit Amendment/Transfer/Extensi I! L� Received Applic tion: •30,20 SEP 3 0 2020 Received Fee: $ 00.00 Completed Application: /d,/ ,2.0 So,ahe!cf lmvi Incomplete: Ro ird of SEQRA Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted Negative Dec. _ Positive Dec. Lead Agency Determination Date: —4Coordination:(date sent): LWRP Consistency Assessment Form Sent: ! CAC Referral Sent: Date of Inspection: Receipt of CAC Report: Technical Review: Public Hearing Held: 0.24,20 Resolution: Owner(s)Legal Name of Property(as shown on Deed): Jeffrey R. Lemler and Anca Lemler Mailing Address: 10 E 53rd St. 425, NEW YORK, NY 10022 Phone Number: 212-983-1080 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000- SECTION 104, BLOCK 10, LOT 6 Property Location: 320 Broadwaters Rd. , Cutchogue NY 11935 (If necessary,provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT(If applicable): Erich Schoenenberger Mailing Address: 96 Bogart St . , Brooklyn NY 11206 Phone Number: 212-941-6494 Board of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet): 38, 567 5 FT Area Zoning: R-4 n - Previous use of property: single family .house Intended use of property: single family house Covenants and Restrictions on property? Yes x No If"Yes",please provide a copy. Will this project require a Building Permit as per Town Code? Yes x No If"Yes",be advised this application will be reviewed by the Building Dept.prior to a Board of Trustee review and Elevation Plans will be required. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals? Yes x No If"Yes",please provide copy of decision. Will this project require any demolition as per Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept.? Yes x No Does the structure(s)on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy? x Yes No Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date Board of Trustees June 11, 2013 1 - No prior permits/approvals for site improvemenfs. Has any,permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? x No Yes If yes,provide explanation: Project Description(use attachments if necessary): i A beach area is proposed. The area would require sand filling (11'x80') Additional native vegetation will be planted. All existing trees to remain. A gravel_ path is 'proposed from the house to the dock, and Long Island pea gravel filling (1001x701) on the remaining area. Small landscape improvements are proposed. Refer to the attached plans and photos for layout, dimensions, amounts and details. Board of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: Landscape improvements, easy access to dock through gravel path, use of area next to dock with proposed beach area. Area of wetlands on lot: 0. 0 square feet Percent coverage of lot: 0. 0 % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 0. 0 feet existing dock Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 0. 0 feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? No X Yes If yes,how much material will be excavated? 0. 0 cubic yards How much material will be filled? 65 cubic yards of sand, 4 cubic yards of gravel Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: 1 feet max of sand deposit Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: 1: 12 max Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: No material will be removed Sand will be deposited with a small bobcat. Statement of the effect, if any,on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations(use attachments if appropriate): No impact to the wetlands are anticipated due to the project, meeting all typical environmental regulatory requirements (ie elevation over wetlands adequate water depth, use of non-treated materials) . Board of Trustees App: iation AUTHORIZATION (Where the applicant is not the owner) fimck CQ V TI/We, - - Q� (4444 faA_ ----------------- owners of theProPertY identified as SCTM# 1000- IZb 13 naAALUiC6 the own of cA-C�-.a -&Q. New York, hereby authorizes to act as my agent and handle all necessary work involved with the application process for permit(s) from the Southold Town Board of Trustees fib __ property. rty Owner's Signature 4ropertWyOwner's Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF . ST87fli 20_zo tow 9t7-- 1 - Notary Public DIANE DISALVO NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No. O 1 D1475593 Qualified In Suffolk County My Commission Expires April 30, 202 Board of Trustees App. ration _AFFIDAVIT BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S),IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES,THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES,INCLUDING THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL,TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS APPLICATION, INCLUDING A FINAL INSPECTION. I FURTHER AUTHORIZE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY AND AS REQUIRED TO INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ANY CONDITION OF ANY WETLAND OR COASTAL EROSION PERMIT ISSUED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES DURING THE TERM OF THE PERMIT. ; re of Property er Signature of Property Owner SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS_ __ _ DAY OF Notary Public DIANE DISALVO NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No. O1 D1475593 Qualified in Suffolk County My Commission Expires April 30, 202y APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officer.-;and emnloyees.'The rimose of this form is to-provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOURNAME: SCHOENENBERGER, ERICH U. (Last name,first name,.gtiddle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee x Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other",name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,rnarriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title br position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal orbeneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(wheat the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 26ZG Signature Print Name Form TS 1 1 ) 61Z20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Completing Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part l based on information currently available. if additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS 320 BROADWATERS Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 320 BROADWATERS RD. , CUTCHOGUE NY 11935 Brief Description of Proposed Action: - Sand filling 111x80' area for proposed beach area - proposed gravel path - long island pea gravel filling (1001x701 ) - planting of native vegetation - all existing trees to remain - small landscape improvements Name of Applicant or Sponsor. Telephone: 212-941-6494 Erich Schoenenberger, SU11 Architecture E-Mail: es@sull.com Address: 96 Bogart St. City/PO: State: Zip Code: Brooklyn NY 11206 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that F] may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: a 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 0.88 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? n-2 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0.8 8 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban []Rural(non-agriculture) [_-]Industrial ❑Commercial ®Residential(suburban) ❑l:orest ❑Agriculture ❑Aquatic []Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 4 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ ❑ ❑ b_Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ❑ ❑ 6. is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? ❑ 0 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: O ❑ 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES Fil EL b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? ❑ c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? ❑ X❑ 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: 0 P 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: ❑ ❑ 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ❑ ❑ 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? ❑ ❑ b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? ❑ ❑ 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ❑ ❑ b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? 0 ❑ If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: ®Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland El Urban ❑Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? ❑ ❑ 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES X 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? 0 NO []YES © ❑ b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: 0 N []YES Page 2 of 4 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: 7X 7 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: ❑ ❑ 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: ❑ ❑ 1 AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMA ION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGEtJ ��2, 'f/C�g"L Applicant/sponsor name: Date: V �j Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part I and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning 1:1 ❑ regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? ❑ ❑ 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? ❑ ❑ 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the El E]establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or ❑ ❑ affect existing infimtructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate ❑ ❑ reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a.public/private water supplies? El E b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? ❑ ❑ 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, ❑ 1:1architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, ❑ Elwaterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage ❑ Elproblems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Town of Southold-Board of Trustees Name of Lead Agency Date President Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT Page 4 of 4 Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1., All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies,.shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are-subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used-by a Town of Southold agency in making.a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. { 2.; 'Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparei of this form should review the exempt minor action list,policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town"of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed-action_will be._,evaluated' as to its sigacant, beneficial andadwgrse effects upon the coastalarea fwhich.includes.all of Southold Town):, 3;_ If any question in Section C on this form is answered"yes" or"no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency ' review law. Thus.-each answer._must:be.explained.in_detaf.-listins;"both-suptaorting and non- Afi �rtiu acts: If ani action cannot be certified as consistent wi61e LWRP policy standards and conditions,-it shall,not be•undertaken. ------_-.- r A copy of the LWRP is available in the-following places: online at the Town of Southold's website(southoidtown.northfork.net),the Board of Trustees Office,the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B.. D-9SCliWnON OF 91TE-AND PROPOSED ACTION i SCTM#_ 104 _t 10 . _ __06_. _ a PROJECT NAME. _._LANDscAPE IMPROVEMENTS_320_:BROADWATERS. The'Applicationhas been submitted to(check appropriate response): t Town Board © Planning Board❑ Building Dept. F] Board of Trustees 1. Category of Town of Southold-agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g.capital' construction,planning activity,agency regulation,'land transaction) ;0 (b) Financial assistance(e.g.grant,loan,subsidy) (c) Permit;approval,license,certification: Nature and extent of action: ' Applicant proposes a new sand area 111x80' filled with sand, a new gravel path, new Long ; Island pea gravel filled-area 1001x701 , plant native vegetation,- keep all existing trees. P Location of action'. 320 Broadwaters Rd., Cutchogue NY 11935 Siteacreage: 0.88 Present land-use: sincile family use, ,.residential_.. Present zoning classification:._ R-40 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: F _ i Y " (a) Name of applicant:. Erich Schoenenberger (b) Mailing address: 96 Bogart St., Brooklyn NY 11206 ` (c) Telephone number:Area Code( ) __ ' 212-941-6494 r r (d) Application number,if any it x Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by astate or federal agency? Yes No If yes,which state orfederal agem ar' C. -Evaluate the project to the following policies:by analyzing.how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the-form be returned for completion. -DEVELOPED_COAST POLICY x Policy 1. Foster a pattern of.development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space,makes efficient use of infrastructure,makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Ul Yes 0 No --].Not Applicable subject proposal is consistent with the character of the surrounding,neighborhood, .which currently consists_of many similarly improved residential lots. Additionally, subject proposal will be in harmony with the_"residential" use_of.coastal. location". . -Attach-additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through,6 for evaluation criteria El Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable J Subject proposal is not applicable to this policy in that it will have no impact to any potential historic and/or archeological resources within the surrounding area. Attach-additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the.Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages,6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes;❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Subject ,proposal will not .adversely,impact the visual quality of the, surrounding area,. Accordingly, this project will comply with Policy 3. - - - - - -- - - Attach additional sheets if necessary -_ .--- _ i NATURAL COAST POLICIES f Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria r �E' Yes ❑ No 1:1 Not Applicable Subject proposal will -fully comply with policy 4 in that the proposed landscape improvements --r-- ible - _ � -- _ s are compatible in design, scope and species 1native species plants) as the surrounding = landscapes will have not resulted in loss of life, structures -arid-nattiral resources-UithiYi ' this area. Accordingly, 'this _ ro os;T will -comply faith- y Polic p p - 4. `s Attach additional sheets if*necessary,- a Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Bouthold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ❑J Yes ❑, No L"J Not Applicable Subject proposal is not applicable to this policy in that it will have no effect to the, water c;utility/supply_within,.the._surroundig area._ Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 . throng] _32 F r-eyaluation_criteria—T_—___ o ❑ ❑ i Yes No Not Applicable Subject proposal will maintain the quality of surrounding ecosystems' in that the proposal is typical of this section of Broadwaters Cove, which has not resulted in significant effects to the surrounding ecosystem. Accordingly,_this proposal will Attach edditioiial sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality.in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III— Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. E V i � Yes D�No• it Not Applicable I Subject proposal is not applicable to this policy in that it will have no effect to 1 the air. c�uality within the surrounding area. :r i Attach additional sheets if necessary i - Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous { substances and wastes. See LWRP'Section III—.Policies; Pages 34 through 38-for evaluatiou criteria, (�$ 1 O Yes a No U'Not Applicable Subject proposal is not applicable to this policy in that it will have no solid waste nor hazardous subs-tances, therefore` wi11 have no effect in environmenta egra atiin. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public-access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies;Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Ye < No 0 Not Applicable Subject proposal is not applicable to this policy in that it will not provide public access nor public use since the affected area is in private property and won'-t affect any surrounding public area. - Attach additional sheets if necessary- i WORIONNG COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect-Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water4ependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III•—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. [],Yes '0 No Q Not Applicable Subject proposal is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve any form of water-dependent-uses Attach additional sfieets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the-Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes No❑ Not Applicable elect nronosal is_not a=lisable -to this__policy .in-that the proposal does..not _c mme cial fisheries, recreational fisheries araaculture etc 1 Attach additional sheets if necessary -" - i Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the_Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages j 62 through 65 for r evaluation-criteria. Yes No El Not Applicable Y Subject proposal is not applicable to this policy in that the proposal does not involve agricultural. lands (ie. the conversion of farmland, the establishment and/or maintenance of new coastal agricultural 'product ion.-etc..) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies;Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Q Yes 'n No 0 Not Applicable Subject proposal is not applicable to this policy in that the_propos_al does not involve thye conservation of energy resources on a commercial level and/or the promotion of alternative energy sources,.__proper maintenance of fuel storage facilities and/or the extraction of minerals) . PREPARED BY-- -- -— — TITLE. � � _ DATE � �