Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLewis, Brion & Leslie Simitch F Michael J.Domino,President �Of SDUJy _ Town Hall Annex 54375 Route 25 John M.Bredemeyer III,Vice-President P.O.Box 1179 Glenn Goldsmith [ Southold,New York 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski G Q Telephone(631) 765-1892 Greg Williams '0% Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 21, 2019 Brooke Epperson AMP Architecture 15400 Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: BRION LEWIS & LESLIE SWITCH 62615 COUNTY ROAD 48, GREENPORT SCTM# 1000-40-1-8 Dear Ms. Epperson: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, November 13, 2019 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, AMP Architecture on behalf of BRION LEWIS & LESLIE SWITCH applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, and Chapter 111 of the Southold Town Code, Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas, application dated August 1, 2019; and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations; and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator recommended that the proposed applications be found Inconsistent with the LWRP, and specifically Inconsistent with the following coastal policies: Policy 4.1 - Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards, Policy 6.3 — Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands; and, r/� Y 2 WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on September 18, 2019 and November 13, 2019, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the structure, as applied for does not comply with the standards set forth in Southold Town Code Chapter 275-11(A)(6)(b) Platforms may not exceed 200 square feet and must be landward of the top of bluff, and WHEREAS, the proposed structure, as applied for, is located in a nearshore area as per Definitions in Chapter 111 Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas of the Town Code and governed by Section 111-11C. All development is prohibited in nearshore areas unless specifically provided for by this chapter; and as per Chapter 111-6 Definitions - Unregulated Activity— docks, piers, wharves or structures built on floats, columns, open timber piles or other similar open work supports with a top surface area less than 200 square feet or which are removed in the fall of each year, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the request, as applied for, will have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, and, adversely weaken or undermine the lateral support of other lands in the vicinity -NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that for foregoing reasons, and because the proposed action is located entirely within the coastal erosion hazard area and in a nearshore area, and because the proposed action is not permitted in such areas pursuant to Chapters 275 and 111 of the Town Code, that the Trustees deem the proposed project to be impermissible under Chapter 275 and Chapter 111, and, - } 3 - BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that for the foregoing reasons, the Board of Trustees DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Wetland and Coastal Erosion Permit application of BRION LEWIS & LESLIE SWITCH for a revision to existing wood deck at top of bluff; portion to remain, 199 square feet seaward; wood landing to remain, 98 square feet seaward; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by AMP Architecture, LLC., dated July 30, 2019. This determination should not be considered a determination made for any other Department or Agency, which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. Very truly yours, O Michael J. Domino, President Board of Trustees MJD/dd '22OJrGT;J"ZC7N{NC ?,4TA SITE LAYOUT NOTES: , LOT Gt7VR,4C ".-' X15TING I. THIS 15 AN ARCHITECTS SITE PLAN $ IS _ TAX MAP # 1000-40-1-8 SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION BY A LICENSED DESCRIPTION AREA % LOT SURVEYOR. THE INFORMATION COVERASE ZONING DISTRICT R-80 NON-CONFORMING REPRESENTED ON THIS SITE PLAN IS TO THE _ EXIST. ARGHITEGT'S BEST OF KNOWLEDGE. TOTAL LOT AREA 4-1,465.0 S.F. 2. SURVEY INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED BRICK LOT AREA 47,465 S.F. FROM A SURVEY DATED APRIL 10, 2019 EXISTING HOUSE 2,211.0 S.F. 4.790 FEMA FLOOD ZONE X AND PREPARED BY: EXISTING SHEDS @ FRONT OF PEGONIG SURVEYORS, P.G. PROPERTY 311.0 S.F. 0.790 WETLANDS DISTRICT WOOD DECK P.O. BOX 909 BLUFF ONLY SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 EXISTING GARDEN SHED 118.0 S.F. 0.490 135' XIST. EXIST. FR. GARDEN TELEPHONE: (631) 765-5020 OF PROPER BRICK SHED_ DEG DISTRICT NON-JURISDICTION EXISTING WOOD DECK ® BLUFF 525.0 S.F. 1.190 7Y HOU51 :1=LOOK"AREA PLEASE REFER TO SURVEY PROVIDED WITH D o THIS APPLICATION FOR THE OVERALL EXI5TIN5 GARAGE INCL WOO 555.0 S.F. 129' EX15TIN5 PROPOSED LAYOUT OF THE PROPERTY. DECK 4 OUTDOOR SHOWER TOTAL AREA OF ALL STRUCTURES 3,836.0 S.F. 8.190 FIRST FLOOR AREA 2211.0 S.F. 2211.0 S.F. SECOND FLOOR AREA 840.0 S.F. 1557.0 S.F. LOT GO�IERfi,�I!"= �'RC7P45E1�" w BEDROOM COUNT 5 4 90 LOT DESCRIPTION AREA COVER T ~ U w H TOTAL LOT AREA 47,465.0 S.F. v J EXI5TIN5 HOUSE 2,211.0 S.F. 4.790 a : PROPOSED ACCESSORY BUILDING 772.0 S.F. 1.6% , EXISTING GARDEN SHED 198.0 S.F. 0.4% W, EXISTING WOOD DECK ® BLUFF (PROP. REDUCTION SIZE) 2x6.0 S.F.-T 0.6% EXI5TIN5 GARAGE INCL. WOOD 583.0 S.F. 1.2% A57',PI ST BLuF DECK 4 OUTDOOR SHOWER H�Lr NE� TOTAL AREA OF ALL STRUCTURED 4,060.0 S.F. i5b% � Y MAXIMUM GOVERASE ALLOWED = 20% ma oa ww w�yZa ~^ ~V Z m U Lu m a-a:0 O ARDEN SHED S 1 TE PLAN Z ao W a c EXIST. 0 TDOOR t i? W W HONE XIST. 2ND STO Y SCALE: 1'-0" = 15'-0" N U,o a o 0 o a wow U EGKREG2UIRE17.REOULATIONS - ",4GGE55URY; C,�R1� N-"SHED.:, a W z z :.. . .. ,, " �WaQ�o z SwF' _ 100' TRUSTEES I G�{-I?• 25' SGTM# 1000-40-1-8 LOT AREA = 47465 S.F. R-80 NON-GONFORMINO 003':0-ou'- JURISDICTION I I N W m w= oz 'w- CL EX(ST. 2 STORY\ EX. BRICK ` _ I f W z o 2 / FRAME l PATIO I I - E::IST. PROP. COMPLIES z a a zix y (5ARAOE I I 0 = zaF MAX. HEIGHT 18.0' 11.01 11.01 YES Z o w Z a z 0.z w �pa �aYw _ _ I MIN. SIDE YARD2 ,���pJ/� I y SETBACK 15.0 3.6 3.6 NO w Z Q 3 W (.� MIN. FRONT YARD 22<;i s g a s w GONG. �G����� - II 37 2 I ► SETBACK 50.0 155.0 155.0 YES o a=w W�w'x 0 Lu - ¢ MAX. SQUARE 1,200 S.F. 198 S.F. 118 Z U F Q S.F. YES w _ _ ~=i FOOTAGE ,=-c0i a a Ir U- - I LINE OF EXIST. 1:XIgIL T. SLATE WOOD DECK STORY FRAME HOUSE; PROP.NNOAREA OF � rn I F---- ��.D A�';C� 2ND FLOOR X WOOD DECK ��� a `✓,� EXIST. BLUESTONE 4 ADDITION; tr N I EXI T. SLATE I TO REMAIN ASPHALT DRIVEWAY EXIST. � z N Io.o� 1 �i-�,� r p r, � � • � ��$` PROP. HEIGHT - I I \ \?.4 23.1' O EXIST. SLATE X o LO T 2 9 2019 Dept copy from ZBA _ ARE OF PRO I Finalrevieweddocuments '9J. 0374 EXIST. -7�3A- '� p Son:; ;d ern 0 ND FLOO EXIyST. SLATE I I wooer Date:IJ/ /, � � ADDITIO I 5TEP5 tue PROP. 96 S.F. COBE --- -- J I WOOD LANDING SIMITC LEWIS c�zsrpNE D SIDS -` REA OF PROP. 1 REWIRED REGUl A' TIONS -`HUUSE " ° '::,; < ':;;;:: I-I� -:r RB S�r�A�K I 2ND FLOOR OPE oP.l2oo S.F. PROPERTY IS WITHIN EXIST. DECK. PROP. DE K WOOD I DECK SGTM# 1000-40-I-8; LOT AREA = 47,465 S.F. ; R-80 NON-GONFORMIND FIRST FLOOR 62615 CR 48 AREA OF PROP. / I Q~ 2ND FLOOR _ I F RINT ADDITION -�, Q ENS, EXIST. PROPOSED COMPLIES GREENPORT, N.Y. 11944 Lu i MINIMUM REQUIRED / I I DRAWING TITLE: FRONT YARD 50.0' 3013.0' 313.0' YE5 HOUSE,WOOD DECK& / I I GARAGE SITE PLANS I A X I SIDE YARD 20.0' 12.2' 12.2' NO i PROJECT DATA BOTH 51 DE YARDS 40.0' 25.0' 25.0' NO PAGE: 100' TRUSTEES I I REAR (FROM TOP OF 1' 3 0' 32 . . 2.1' NO A-1 �A�1 I� OO JURISDICTION I BLUFF) 100 I I GEH,q MAXIMUM PERMITTED � EDAM /21/19 10F 3 BUILDING HEIGHT 55.01 23.11 25.11 YES MOUSE, OARAOr MOOD DEOK SITE PLAN NUMBER OF STORIES 2 1/2 1 1/2 2 YES SCALE: 1'-0" = 15'-O" 1 i 51TE LAYOUT NOTES: fi G2Uli' L? R C�UI..AT1bN5 -`ArrT=550R*-( 5UfiL.D11�G. I. TH15 15 AN ARCHITECTS SITE PLAN B IS IO.. o' O" 5UBJEGT TO VERIFICATION BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR. THE INFORMATION 5GTM# 1000-40-1-8; LOT AREA = 47,465 S.F.; R-80 NON-CONFORMING REPRESENTED ON THIS 51TE PLAN IS TO THE ARGHITECT'5 BEST OF KNOWLEDGE. 2. SURVEY INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED EXIST. PROP. COMPLIES FROM A SURVEY DATED APRIL 10, 2011 AND PREPARED BY: MAX. HEIGHT 18.0' 12.a' 15.5 YES _ PEGONIG SURVEYORS, P.G. EX15T.SHED P.O. BOX aoa MIN. SIDE YARD 15.0' 2.a' 2.a' NO SOUTHOLD, N.Y. IIci71 SETBACK TELEPHONE: (631) 165-5020 MIN. FRONT YARD 50.01 37.1' 3a.3 NO SETBACK PLEASE REFER TO SURVEY PROVIDED WITH MAX. 50UARE 11 THIS APPLICATION FOR THE OVERALL LFOOTAGE 1,200 S.F. 140 S.F. 74a S.F. YES 3_p LAYOUT OF THE PROPERTY. I I W O 1 SaXD¢BARN W DOOR 0_' NEW ACCESSORY M BUILDING �U � UNCONDITIONED UNFINISHED SPADE 0 = J N3 o 5aXb BARN J 4 11�pjv o a 39.3, 1�GGE55. BLDO. FLOOR PLAN � EXIST. SHED TO BE ——___ SCALE: I/8" = I'-O" y � P � PROPOSED ACOE55ORY EXIST. SHED TO a / BUILDING REMAIN AND BUILT o¢ w w Q INTO NEW ACCESSORY BUILDING N �Z m a h °F° nW.3:sga Za(pw�CD In0 �Q �� O z¢F w Q 1 ¢ w v Lz OZ z Lu L2 Ox = �F ypOO W w W J 0 0 o 0;E =1" N W o / A aWOxxr- AGGE55. BL l70. FRONT ELEVATION ,�GG�55. �'L1�0. RI O HT ELEVATION ON a a J a =r 9 2!?O a a w SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-O" SCALE: I/8" = I'-O" N W`�—'o z 0 J ~ O w Z¢Z -'z w p Q Q Y w =U O y O w U ~-j LL w w V w �0/,z x F ZUf.~ Lu w~~OW �x W Z U O F U Agp �AL R/ FGy� Y x0cr Elo � o�N M p0'�' V,C� ELL AGGF-55. BLDG. SITE PLAN SCALE: 1'-0" = 15'-0" ACCESS. E3L170. REAR ELEVATION ACCESS. BLDO. LEFT ELEVATION ^ SCALE: I/8" = 1'-0" SCALE: I/8" = 1'-0" �,9�,� 037405 OF tE PROJECT: C(,7 rC. `i _ SIMITCH/LEWIS�Z PROPERTY 292019 � j MODIFIED WOOD in — 62615 CR 48 LANDING 1 I GREENPORT, N.Y. 11944 I r I I s 3'-0" I � Bard of�Tr este DRAWING TITLE: ACCESSORY BUILDING PLANS I I I & ELEVATIONS PORTION OF DECK MODIFIED WOOD O I I STRULGOvMI WOOD DECK @BLUFF TURER DEG 1 I uNDER1CATH TO p I I I I REMAIN j �rAS�QLD S PAGE: 201-0 r3tDept copy fromZBA mm mnt A-200 exlsrlrrs vEK tv(na+!reviewed Qocurrrents FRAMING 5TRCJOTURE TO REMAIN PROP. NOOD PF—GK M01�I F I OATI ON DATE:5/21/19 2 OF 3 SCALE: 1/5" = 1'-0" I O 5 ROOM I DECK IMODIFIED NEW DEN I BATHROOM ---------------------------------- I I EXIST.DINING MODIFIED �i EXIST. MASTER ROOM BEDROOM i BEDROOM I i _ 7 E0 �4 r­r2 - - = m EX15T, KITCHEN I O ' im EXIST.LIVING EXIST. MODIFIED MODIFIED ri I BEDROOM m BEDROOM 8'-3" 3'-II" W� EX, ROOM BATHROOM ;f 17N. INEN EXIST, _j O w ®® C-L Ex fn m - _ NEN EX15T,FOYER TAT 3' q vr+. to Q O I O EXE LIP NEN LAUNDRY I (D BAT R OM r- ASTERT O L ————— BATHROOM I I I -.151-611 L-------------------------------------� PROP05ED HOUSF_ F I RST FLOOR FROP05ED HOUSE SF-GOND FLOOR EXIST. PROPOSED AREA: 2,211 S.F. SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" EXIST. AREA: 835 S.F.; PROPOSED AREA: 1,54-7 S.F. SCALE: 1/8" = I'—O" �a oQ ww wOp} zQx�: 7 F Z m U mw agQ 0 z w a p Z a o w a m LL v=iwLLo zarw- W `�"a _ _ z o .,,..,.,�,_.............».r.,_.,,.re„,,,r«„ ':�:;:,.n^:M::;z ,..�.;�:-;,".;�».r,.�.y.._,,.,,r.-»za,;•:;».„^'^,;��:�:�;zz;^aM..;.9- ;r..�:s^^,_a m•,,,:^�A--.,,.._............r_r .-,..,- ,r.w,,,.,,,�,,,..,,..,,,..,..,,,»,r.,r.,,.-_,.».,.,,..,.,w,,,,,«,.ww,.,,...,r„,,,.,.,, ¢ Q w - -�O Li 0 Zwa� w 11 111 HIM Q km WW W J W O E o Zwa �Hli 11 11 IT 0, F1 F1 1 ' ! Cruz=�s a W a r _ . Z W Q Q Q Y w w W F- LUlii Z � ❑ �' 4- DDin N W Q p 11 11 WIN III 1 777t o W Z U F O U U Q Q d Q 1 11 11 IT 11 11 IT 11 111 FROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION FROFOSF_ID RICHT ELEVATION �ipF-DA ,O 50ALE: 1/8” = 1'-0" SCALE: I/V' = 1'-0" �e5� pO .A �n w'' �r 037405 Q� FOf NE�y _ PROJECT: - m - IT LEWIS PROPERTY MA� I 62615 CR 48 ""........ ..rr.. .�e.arw I �a I : OCT 2 9 2018 GREENPORT, N.Y. 11944 v�+f1.'* , %Yf I.TT�rFr '�'FX3��✓io,��, j1 :.:- .. , rIDa , ..,„vrr.,nn.,.,enn.n,�wrs,n✓xrwn. aPe9, _- aoaPfJP.*AroYrA^ - Tep •::i::• +*�Av„';R-A.,sS ,:Y,9, SS k� .z-ww,une✓srowrrsrrmr,wrrw,vrrr ”' �r,�,.q�-„-,.•r �„- anmanw„n»wwr.rrrw„«<,ww,n�^,.vr.,eer+w�vr»nn.wnxvm»+esaw-wnrrrrn<»n.,sr,rrvrrrrrrw»,r�rrrsr,«,e„r,rv. -. ... - DRAWING TITLE: Soot,Gl a Tnv n -- �^ar ofTrl-�stee PROPOSED HOUSE PLANS 0 & ELEI Iij HII VATIONS ooa PAGE: A-300 PROP05ED REAR ELEVATION I' = I_ ,I FROi�OSED LEFT ELEVATION - ����� SCALE: I/&ll O SCALE. I/8" - 1'-0” IAS©apt ®Qy from ZBA DATE:5/21/19 3 OF 3 Final mvi,:�wed ocuments ZBA File# Date• L 11 PROJECT I ZON I NIS7 17ATA TAX MAP # 1000-40-1-8 ZONING DISTRICT R-80 NON-CONFORMING LOT AREA 47,465 S.F. FEMA FLOOD ZONE X WETLANDS DISTRICT YES DEC DISTRICT NON-JURISDICTION HOUSE.FLOOR"AREA". ' EXISTING PROPOSED PROPOSED 2ND STORY ADDITION; FIRST FLOOR AREA 2211.0 S.F. 2211.0 S.F. EXISTING RIDGE HEIGHT ELEV. +43.5' TRUSTEES AREA O REMAINING SECOND FLOOR AREA 840.0 S.F. 1557.0 S.F. NON-JURI SD 1 GTI ON TOP OF WOOD DECK BEDROOM COUNT 5 4 11 11 IT 11 111111 111111 111 1 111111 G.E.H.A. BLUFF BOTTOM OF MEAN HIGH L11 BLUFF WATER MAR< 4 SITE LAYOUT NOTES: TIE LINE EXISTING SECOND FLOOR = 1. THIS 15 AN ARCHITECTS SITE PLAN 15 ELEV. +31.2' m SUBJECT TO \/ERI F I CATI ON BY A LI LENSED uj« ' SUR\/EYOR. THE INFORMATION REPRESENTED ON THIS SITE PLAN 15 TO THE U EXISTING FIRST FLOOR ARCHITECT'S BEST OF KNOWLEDGE. H ELEV. +21.4' 11 I _______NORTH ________�_ I 1 2. SUR\/EY INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED = EEV• +:20.4 VATION GRADE FROM A SUR\/EY DATED APRIL 10, 201cl -' AND PREPARED BY: a �� EXISTING EARTH PECONIC SUR\/EYORS, P.G. P.O. BOX cf OOf , . EXIST. WOOD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. Ile-1-71 I I STAIRCASE I TELEPHONE: (631) -765-5020 I I I j�A MEAN HIGH WATER MARK NU ELEV. +0.0' I I I I I I I I LONG ISLAND SOUND I I I I SITE ELE\/AT10N SCALE: I'-O" = 10'-O" ui _ o � _ F EXIST. Z SHED ► w EXIST. y SHED _ T ' (NOT PART OF U / THIS FILLING) _ / BRICK ` Ty0lygs ZolT�s p d EXIST.FR. _ BRICK 6ARDEN NOT PART OF _ / SHED THI5 FILLING) !(, 100' TRUSTEES r1 _ JURISDICTION; (b / MEASURED FROM I� I DAP TOP OF BLUFF t AUG 1 2019 M. � ►_ .�! � _ IGENA 12B Pn r(Lo rTt �s _ 3740 y0 E BRICK � � EXIST. 2 STORY PATIO 53.2o��20' FRAME A XII HT ,UEgTO GARAGE Q F N --I_ B ALT b�lY (NOT PART OF TH15 FILLING) GONG. {GAP���� II II •� O� I� PHOTO 04 0 _.� 5�$o� PROJECT: SLATE II 11 LINE OF EXIST. _ WOOD DECK SIMITCH/LEWIS I • RENOVATION — ' WOOD LANDING EXIST. BLUESTONE d I EXIST. I N. I TO REMAIN;q8 STORY FRAME 1 N SLATE I S.F. I I ASPHALT DRIVEWAYI O HOUSE;PROP. 2ND FLOOR ADDITION; O I a I N SLATE EXIST. 4 3 PHoro PROP. HEIGHT rn 62615 CR 48 •�'_ Nr0 I \ SLATE ` III "' GREENPORT, N.Y. 11944 k�NNzT y /AREA OF PROP. I L------- I I AREA OF . " ¢ ALEX oBBLEST ADDITION; FL A R \` I WOOD DECK 1 r DRAWING TITLE: `;Nb qL8 cu) O/� / ALL \ \ I PHoro Kv 1 TO REMAIN;Icl LOT COVERAOE �cyT % IS PROPOSED EXIsrOirRi6 ,\ � � I S.F. II � \ SITE PLAN & ZONING DATA HOUSE FOOTPRINT; DESCRIPTION AREA 90 LOT TRUES J \ \� () COVERAGE ' ' li PROPERTY ELEVATION NON-JURISDICTION I I I TOTAL LOT AREA 47,465.0 S.F. Z 100'TRUSTEES I I d JURISDICTION; EXISTING HOUSE 2,211.0 S.F. 4.790 MEASURED FROM N TOP OF BLUFF 'II, PHoro•2 I / PAGE: PROPOSED ACCESSORY BUILDING 772.0 S.F. 1.6% I I b I I MODIFIED WOOD DECK ® BLUFF 2x7.0 S.F. 0.630 _�® EXISTING GARAGE INCW L. OOD 583.0 5.F. 1.2% I 0 i / Z 0 DECK 8 OUTDOOR SHOWER ti� GEH �� / EXISTING GARDEN SHED IQ8.0 S.F. 0.490 TOTAL AREA OF ALL STRUCTURES 4061.0 S.F. 8.630 DATE: 07/30/19 101171 MAXIMUM COVERAGE ALLOWED = 20% z ' 3• SITE PLAN SCALE: 1'-0" = 20'-0" Michael J. Don 'resident �Qs>JfrF�( Town Hall Annex John M. Bredemeyer ui, v ice-President 54375 Route 25 Glenn Goldsmith c P.O.Box 1179 N Z A.Nicholas Krupski Southold,NY 11971 Greg Williams Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES / TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date/Time: l d�l°1 ��f� Completed in field by: 7`0 AMP Architecture on behalf of BRION LEWIS & LESLIE SWITCH requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit for a revision to existing wood deck at top of bluff; portion to remain, 199 square feet seaward; wood landing to remain, 98 square feet seaward. Located: 62615 County Road 48, Greenport. SCTM# 1000-40-1-8 CH. 275-3 - SETBACKS WETLAND BOUNDARY: Actual Footage or OK=� Setback Waiver Required 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 50 feet 3. Sanitary Leaching Pool (cesspool): 100 feet 4. Septic Tank: 75 feet 5. Swimming Pool and related structures: 50 feet 6. Landscaping or gardening: 50 feet 7. Placement of C&D material: 100 feet TOP OF BLUFF: 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 100 feet 3. Sanitary leaching pool (cesspool) 100 feet: 4. Swimming pool and related structures: 100 feet Public Notice of'Hearing Card Posted: Y / N Ch. 275 ✓ Ch. 111 SEQRA Type: 1 II Unlisted Action Type of Application: Pre-Submission Administrative Amendment Wetland Coastal Erosion Emergency Violation Non-Jurisdiction Survey <_ 5 years: Y/N Wetland Line by: C.E.H.A. Line Additional information/suggested modifications/conditions/need for outside review/consultant/application completeness/comments/standards: �eG� Stt,� exp C 2-OO � �. I have read & acknowledged the foregoing Trustees comments: Agent/Owner.- Present gent/Owner:Present were: J. Bredemeyer Domino `/'/G. Goldsmith ✓ N. Krupski �,//G. Williams Other r V`., • y n - o V .. L f L F .. a •, _• `'; NC'W Ofk Sea �CaClt i46 Suffolk Hall•Stony Brook University,,,.,,,,, Bringing Science Stony Brook,,NY' Y,',11794-5002: New York to the Shore 631.632.8736•SGS,tonyb@a cornell.,edu www.nyseagrant.org ` Dear Brion, Thank you for inviting me out to your property at 62615 County Route 48 in Greenport on September 18th to discuss the stability of the bluff. In this letter I provide a brief summary of my technical observations of the coastal processes occurring at the property. ' While there is a sizeable wooden deck that sits at the bluff crest,the overall stability of the coastal feature appears well. Typically large structures on top of bluffs will add substantial weight and increase the chance of bluff slumping and erosion. However,multiple factors at work on this particular property seem to be countering this force.This is not to say that failure of the structure and bluff face cannot/will not happen,just that currently it is not occurring. The deck is built upon substantial footings that appear in good condition and have likely contributed to the structure's longevity.Removing these footings could potentially result in major shifting and possibly slumping of the internal sediment composition of the bluff.The bluff face, while very steep, is well-vegetated,which further stabilizes the formation by binding sediment grains and holding them in place with extensive root systems.At the time of the site visit,there were no visible signs of erosion on the bluff face.Any construction work to remove the deck and footings would damage the current vegetation increasing the quantity of water runoff and risk of erosion.Additionally the toe of the bluff is in good condition and protected from erosive wave attack by large boulders along the shoreline. This area appears to have remained fairly stable through time and the width of the beach acts as a buffer zone preventing undercutting at the toe which would result in bluff face slumping.The shape of the shoreline and naturally occurring large glacial deposits have protected much of this shoreline from destructive wave attack.Through observing aerial imagery from Google Earth,the deck has existed in its current state since 1994(this is the farthest aerial image record available to me)withstanding multiple large storm systems such as nor'easters and in particular, Superstorm Sandy;further speaking to the stability of the built structure and natural coastal feature. Overall, while the risk of erosion will always be present, currently the bluff is stable and any constructed work could increase the possibility of erosion occurring.A best management practice would be to leave the property as-is as nature continues to take its course. If and when the deck structure becomes a hazard to the property it should be removed and the bluff restored to its natural state. If coastal construction is to be undertaken at this property, an experienced contractor and/or consultant should be hired and it is important to confirm with all local, state, and federal regulatory agencies that the proper permits have been submitted and approved before work commences.If you have any further questions feel free to reach out to me. i Sincerely, FFF- - Kathleen M.Fallon PhD Coastal Processes and Hazards Specialist ®CT 4 2019 i Kmf228@cornell.edu Snuihoid h,vrn New York Sea Grant New York Sea Grant(NYSG) is a federally and state funded program between the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association, State University of New York, and Cornell University. Our non-advocacy extension program works with a wide-range of stakeholders to provide science-based information so that the most educated decisions can be made regarding the management of our coastlines. U E C _� Z 011f OCT 4 2019 SCFc,Fo_21-To-vin Boar of Trusiue l Suffolk County SWCD ®�K CC Corey Humphrey,CPESC 423 Griffing Avenue {� C�j], District Manager Suite 110 (631)852-3285 Riverhead,NY 11901 I www.SuffolkSWCD.org Rob Carpenter g Chairman S CONSEM September 13, 2019 Leslie K.Weisman 1� (r? ( A i' Chairperson Board of Appeals i� j� �lu Town of Southold �J ll OCT 4 2019 P.O. Box 11791 Southold, New York 11971-0959 S^.Ui1�U1Q(QS7� Re:ZBA#7325 Lewis, Brion SCTM#1000-40-1-8 Board of laces Chairperson Weisman, Thank you for reaching out to the Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District and requesting technical assistance regarding the proposed improvements to the property located at 62615 CR 48, Greenport, NY. I conducted an inventory and evaluation of the site on August 27th, 2019 with respect to the proposed property improvements detailed in the Notice of Disapproval letter sent to the applicant on February 9th, 2019.The improvements include additions/alterations to an "as built" accessory building, legalize an "as built"accessory garden shed and an accessory deck and construct additions/alterations to an existing single-family dwelling. My evaluation focuses on the following grounds for disapproval: Article XXII Section 280-116A(1) "All buildings or structures located on lots upon which there exists a bluff landward of the shore or beach shall be set back not fewer than 100 feet from the top of such bluff."The site plan shows the as built deck at 0 feet from the top of the bluff. In addition,the proposed construction to the existing single-family dwelling is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII section which states that lots measuring 40,000-59,000 square feet in total size require a minimum side yard setback of 20 feet.The proposed construction has a side yard setback of 12.2 feet.Also,the construction is 32 feet from the top of the bluff. I observed the site and respectfully submit the following comments with respect to the matters listed above: 1) Observed Site Conditions and Bluff Evaluation:The waterfront residential property located at 62615 CR 48,Greenport, NY,is located atop a bluff that leads down to the Long Island Sound.The natural Office Hours:Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m.to 4:00 p.m. Friday 7:30 a.m.through 3:00 p.m. topography of the property slopes away from the bluff top,southward,towards the front entrance of the property on CR 48.The land atop of the bluff to the south is well vegetated with a mix of perennial grasses,trees, native plants and shrubs.The bluff face's angle of repose does not meet the recommended 3:1 ratio, however the bluff is still well stabilized with vegetation and there are no significant signs of erosion.The face of the bluff is steep and consists of several plant species that are stabilizing the bluff. It was noted that the predominate species on the bluff's face and top is Rosa rugose. The toe of the bluff is not supported by a hardened shoreline(bulkhead)and does not show signs of wind and water erosion.The toe of the bluff is however fortified with large boulders that span the length of the property as well as several of the neighboring properties to both the East and West.These boulders help to protect the toe of the bluff from strong tidal and storm driven erosive forces.The top of the bluff and the adjacent back yard of the property is well vegetated with a mixture of mature perennials. See attached images. A subterranean irrigation system was located on the property and appears to be in good working order (Note:the irrigation system was not checked for leaks or deficiencies). It is recommended that the irrigation heads located atop of the bluff should be relocated away from the bluff to ensure that negative impacts that may arise from the irrigation system are minimized.Sprinkler heads should be reviewed for adequacy and emitters should be replaced as necessary to limit any potential impacts to the bluff.All irrigation should be directed way from the bluff as not to create rill,sheet or channel erosion.See attached images. 2)Proposed Modifications:The current structure(single family dwelling) on the property is located very close to the top of the bluff(<32') and currently does not impact the bluff's stability.The proposed additions to the structure will likely have little impact on the stabilization and health of the bluff that is adjacent to the structure.The proposed additions do not exceed the current footprint and any increase in runoff that may be generated from the modification is inconsequential. Currently there is a gutter drainage system that discharges runoff into the ground and not over the soil. It should be noted that with any modification, adequate drainage systems must be redesigned to capture and responsibly discharge stormwater runoff so no negatives may result. With respect to the non-conforming deck that sits atop of the bluff with a 0'set back, it is my opinion that any modification to the deck's size,shape or orientation may create a series of negative impacts to the existing bluff.Although the as built deck does not follow local building codes, modification to the deck for the purpose of conforming to building codes may not be the recommended.The existing deck and structural footings appear to be in good condition and currently do not pose additional risks to the overall health of the bluff.The modification or removal of this structure,that will exposes unvegetated areas of the bluff,will likely result in significant erosion of the soils on site. Often times when a bluff has exposed soils,such as would be the case if the deck in question were to be removed, erosion will cause these soils to erode.This erosion not only damages the bluff at the exposed areas, but may also damage the well established vegetation that is currently stabilizing the rest of the bluff. Planting new perennial vegetation on a bluff face can often take several years to establlsh�b4forC6deyqualltefy'stabiliz�ng,the soils OCT 4 2019 SPt1ii`rir;io'rrn __.- Boaid ai iriicic s on the bluff. During this time,erosive forces from both wind and precipitation have a high likelihood of damaging the new plantings and any exposed areas of the bluff.In addition,areas of unstabilized bluff can quickly destroy vegetated areas by causing a chain of soil loss that spreads to other areas of the bluff overtime. 4)Additional considerations: • All ground disturbance activities have an impact. If soil disturbance is minimized the impacts associated with the activated are significantly decreased. Undisturbed and vegetated areas should be left undisturbed whenever possible. • Protection of existing vegetation is critical to ensuring the long-term stabilization of the property. Protected areas should be clearly identified with bright colored ribbon and/or fencing prior to the commencement of construction.Additionally,stockpile locations,staging areas and access points must be clearly defined to minimize impacts. • Any improvement that alters the natural course of drainage(ex:structures, impervious surfaces, conveyances,etc.)will increase the impact of stormwater runoff.Consideration should be taken to minimize the impact of runoff during and after construction. Erosion and sediment control measures should be implemented prior to ground disturbing activities. • All efforts should be taken to vegetate and stabilize disturbed soils as soon as possible.See NYS Standards and Specification for Erosion and Sediment Control (`Blue-Book")for additional control measures and considerations. • Construction and the use of heavy equipment may impact the stabilization of soils.Vibrations from machinery as well as soil compaction have adverse impacts. Machinery should not be left to idle and only running when in use.The location and storage of such equipment should be as far away as possible from critical areas such as bluffs and any unstable soils. • Although there may have not been any impacts from the irrigation found at the site, it is cautioned that all irrigation systems should be limited to protect the stabilization of the bluff and the surrounding soils.System components such as valves,controllers, pipes and irrigation head emitters should be reviewed periodically.The implementation of"smart" irrigation controllers are recommended where feasible.With all irrigation systems,annual maintenance by a qualified individual is recommended. Thank you for contacting the Soil and Water Conservation District for comments. It is recommended that the Zoning Board of Appeals carefully review all the factors related-to this decision. I am available to discuss this site in greater detail at your convenience if you should have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact our office. _ 1 Corey Humphrey,C.P.E.S.C. OCT 4 2019' 3 F _ i I f.. S. YP e Bluff is well vegetated and is in good condition. Photo taken from the shoreline facing south west. it 1Lb OCT 4 2019 t. _.. Board ;; 4 { I POO 15R ' `' > --a LSI '� r• ��,.. e , ` II 1 .: w4 Staircase the leads to the shoreline is stable and in good condition. Note the dense vegetation that surrounds the staircase. Photo taken from the shoreline facing south west. t I OCT 4 2019 jl " + I , { t2G':iii •�: 5 'W, Bluff is well vegetated and is in good condition. Note the large boulder that protect the bluff. Photo taken from the shoreline facing South East. OCT 4 2019 I 6 ' o r. '� Six ` Y ag V 5 ti A • IT rfON ° �5 �,4 i" - r Lk it -106 Irrigation system: pop-up style irrigation heads that irrigate the lawn/bluff. It is recommended that this irrigation system be relocated southward away from the bluff to minimize impacts from the bluff. Photo take on the deck facing West. OCT 4 2019 9 t$r ��. •� �1M' ..t� w� �r ti•_ o n URMF i s e IRMIMC t mow. r "540 _rte Existing deck. Note the current dense vegetation and the decks of neighboring properties'. Photo taken facing east. ' OCT 4 2019 11 le A: r � sar b d•` '"'. ��� ,•+�T �-+.; ..dam' Y,k�, .• -:�. I i s t 1 t sm Stormwater conveyance system.Gutters and downspouts are well maintained and functioning by capturing roof runoff and directing this volume into the black underground pipe. ,1 OCT 4 2019 { 13 o ap T r , r 4 n_ 1 s Wj y e,,-,:.I ,. ,�`f>' r� �4Yyk�rfGr "' r h►r ..r�. �s�' r - �� Y6 sa' !s �- •� � �:-, `� ,y' ;�` � ate' r'✓' S,$,lrff fi'fpg 1^jr1! k''� �`. +I�,'• y. l w°+ ,' �� - !G.f�c�TiLi4su^�.'ar3r ft.`� � :.` i� � �. ��t� 4P�•'P, i� t A b�«! s�' < m�`��J34�.`k•::►!., � !�. Possible pipe slope drain inlet that conveys any excess runoff over the bluff through this black pipe rather than discharging stormwater that would flow over the bluff and cause erosion. Confirmation of the pipe's should be determined. OCT 4 2019 E 14 ,S ♦u lot Black conveyance pipe found near the toe of the bluff.Source of pipe was not located, but may be a pipe slope drain. Further investigation may be warranted. Photo taken at shoreline, adjacent to the staircase. OCT 4 2019 s 15 Michael J. Domeesident rQ Q Town Hall Annex John M. Bredemeyer III,'*ice-President 4�Y�® 54375 1{oute 25 Glenn Goldsmith o "` P.O.Box 1179 CO � A.Nicholas Krupski Southold,NY 11971 Greg Williams 4,- Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN'TRUSTEES 1 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ' Date/Time:--TJ Completed in field by: J : 8fe—dCm '�, AMP Architecture on behalf of BRION LEWIS & LESLIE SIMITCH requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit for a revision to existing wood deck at top of bluff; portion to remain, 199 square feet seaward; wood landing to remain, 98 square-feet seaward. Located: 62615 County Road 48, Greenport. SCTM# 1000-40-1-8 CH. 275-3 - SETBACKS 'WETLAND BOUNDARY: Actual Footage or OK=� Setback Waiver Required 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 50 feet 3. Sanitary Leaching Pool (cesspool): 1,00 feet 4. Septic Tank: 75 feet 5. Swimming Pool and related structures:,50 feet 6. Landscaping or gardening: 50 feet 7. Placement of C&D material: 100 feet TOP OF BLUFF: 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 100 feet 3. Sanitary leaching pool (cesspool) 100 feet: 4. Swimming pool and related structures: 100 feet Public Notice of Hearing ,Card Posted: Y / N Ch. 275 Ch. 111 SEQRA Type: 1 II Unlisted Action Type of Application: Pre-Submission Administrative Amendment Wetland Coastal Erosion Emergency Violation Non-Jurisdiction Survey <_'5 years: Y/N. Wetland Line by: C.E.H.A. Line Additional information/suggested mod ifications%conditions/need for outside review/consultant/application comp)/etene!3s/c/omments/standards: )V eQA 0jF � /j Ic- Ale Al Lf YhAl� Z4 I have read & acknowledged the foregoing Trustees comments: Agent/Owner: Present were: J. Bred emeyer / M. Domino �G. Goldsmith N. Krupski G. Williams Other (Alli,i C 64A Zw StG ff �dr�✓ r�l�-f .� did L�� r �y4 I OL '+w .+ .* �- r .,,�� -" � - ,� lop Q s . !► _ off I w wk s , �O ..Y -1 CAP . vwmm 9 / 11 /201 ! -1024_ ' + Illi it r - .t 1 PHOTO • , , 1 M j �J PHOTO #3 PHOTO .4 i r. PHOTO #5 PHOTO#6 1.I i mr..,. ,..,N•I i�--- I..n..... --•--I � I -- - Aw TE 7 SEE SEc.xo. QbA U as .g a`�, wE �DeT s sP PO pE. Ida 0 -) / A2J J Qut,a�i1�0 SATS) a E1A ++e ,3 COUN-OF SUFFOLK T Ea.u[,cn.11 O SUNTY OF %• EILIA _! / L MAP OF MOORESUNO -'b __ 4 e.]A xaERSa 0 cUN TS SEEM +� 6, A p / CSUFFO E...nsa v® (FOR UNITS SEF SEC 1o.5 o qy 104A([) SEE SLE NO tJR / \G 15A I VA + an m 4`c y9' E 2«EM M p -%OWN O sE E GR ,oa 9 O _ ,eA °J d`O p i E iinwv $ SQ W"_n.Y QwiXns J�� / aJl S.OA(c) S O N \ aE Ei.pra ! .—GE OF 2a O 9.4 O gyp+ / GREENPORT 2.0A(c) c3 E�,.aT�,r "N j moo' 14H[`� > 21 a / Y 2Wy ]2 a1 [2,un�v ms 1 TMc) i 2.W[) y 1 NOH,H P S «E.ms.t, / IS 8$ 1.Wc) iiA y ser ,�.tvs1 / 15 I. 4ue m a / = ITA(c) 1]AAe) 1� ¢ 9�pTP S a �• GA.A.a.aA 2 O yO 5 ( E;-w— 1'W[) 1r r 1.Mf[ 1 N -f / 2.3Ald b e m•a.,N•E G) �^ Z ,n 11A[ m O . P 4u11TM O T e n1At[) 4.A1.as.s ,� s O O FOR PCL NO. T .= SEE SEC NO 0. 1 tAlc) kk Oa69T-005.1 o' O Ina.rmaA e O i ,.K[)p „ �� +� �'�a �Fx su � 4«EaaE« TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �m� c7�Q.aae ]tMU � O uA alem r rmE wR yVILLAGE OF GEENPORT aet --� m,m� AUTCX �—UN HUTCH uNE O & $ t AUTLN --LINE 1 SEE SEc.NO MS 4. Via. oqf SEE SEC.NO.M5 W ,..T e � COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © K O SOUTHOLo -`•`- .�r•1 r �1) �m NOTICE C-ww TY E tuaoE� SECTION NO _ _ Q _ _ __ ___ Real Property Tax Sernce Agency Y tao d CeuMy MMar 0.F NTEa/,NY,tAM O.0 2.1Nw>,au A w+Ne1 P y5 f000 PROPERTY AMP �U BOARD MEMBERS ����IV S0Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson 53095 Main Road •P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora = Office Location: Eric Dantes _ �� Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. O! 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento �Irou Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov RECEIVED OCT 2 9 2019 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS a, jilwUg q:58�}dl,�,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 6� OCT 2 8 2019 0 Southold Town Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax (631)765-9064 Board of Trustees l.L FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINA IW hold Town Clerk MEETING OF OCTOBER 24, 2019 r ZBA FILE: 7325 NAME OF APPLICANT: Brion Lewis PROPERTY LOCATION: 62615 CR 48, Greenport SCTM No. 1000-40-1-8 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated June 17, 2019 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated October 9, 2019. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. However, based upon the information from Soil and Water and the conditions imposed herein the Board finds the proposed actions are CONSISTENT with the LWRP. SUFFOLK COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT: This application was referred to- Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District (SCS&WCD) for review and comment and the SCS&WCD issued its reply dated September 13, 2019 indicating an inventory, evaluation and site visit occurred on August 27, 2019. Agency comments include: 1) The bluff is well stabilized with vegetation and there are no significant signs of erosion. All efforts should be taken to vegetate and stabilize disturbed soils as soon a possible. Irrigation system should be relocated away from bluff to ensure that negative impacts do not arise; 2) Although the dwelling is located very close to the top of the bluff, it does not currently impact the bluff's stability. Adequate drainage systems must be redesigned to capture stormwater runoff so that no negative impacts result. 3) The report's findings with respect to the non-conforming deck that sits atop the bluff state that any work to the deck to bring it into further conformance with the code is not recommended at this time, and any work to it would cause erosion damage to the bluff, 4) The location and storage of heavy equipment should be located far away as possible from critical areas such as bluffs and any unstable soils. Page 2, October 24,2019 #7325, Lewis SCTM No. 1000-40-1-8 PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The subject parcel is a non-conforming 47,465 sq. ft. property located in an R-80 Zoning district. The property has an 80.00 ft. frontage on County Road 48, then runs 525.07 ft. north to Long Island Sound, then runs east 98.69 ft, to then returns south 542 34 ft. back to County Road 48. The property is improved with a one-and-one-half story frame dwelling and an accessory garage. There is also a wood deck located along the top of the bluff and two framed sheds located in the front yard. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article III, Section 280-15; Article XXII, Section 280- 116A(1); Article XXIII, Section 280-124; and the Building Inspector's May 1, 2019, Amended May 31, 2019 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct additions and alterations to an "as built" accessory building, legalize an "as built" accessory garden shed and an accessory deck, and construct additions and alteration to an existing single family dwelling; at, 1) accessory building located less than the code required front yard setback of 50 feet; 2) accessory building located less than the code required side yard setback of 15 feet; 3) "as built" accessory garden shed located less than the code required side yard setback of 15 feet; 4) "as built" accessory deck located less than the code required 100 feet from the top of the bluff, 5) single family dwelling located less than the required side yard setback of 20 feet; 6) single family dwelling located less than the required 100 feet from the top of the bluff; located at 62615 County Road 48, (Adj. to Long Island Sound) Greenport, NY, SCTM No. 1000-40-1-8. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances for the following: 1. Legalize the as-built accessory buildings located in',the front yard, where in the case of a waterfront parcel such structures may be located in the front yard, provided that such buildings and structures meet the front yard principal setback requirements, and the side yard requirements for accessory buildings. 2. Retain an existing "as built" shed and remove an adjacent existing storage container and make new additions to the as built shed to construct a new accessory building in the front yard with a front yard setback of 39.3 ft where a minimum of 50 ft is required, and a 2.9 ft side yard setback where a minimum of 15 ft is required 3. Legalize an as built garden shed with a 3.6 feet side yard setback where the code requires a minimum of 15 feet 4. Legalize an "as-built" accessory deck which is not permitted within 100 ft from the top of the bluff. Existing deck has a 0 ft bluff setback. 5. Proposed second story additions with a side yard setback of 12.2 ft. where a minimum of 20 ft. is required. Also, the proposed construction is only 32.1 ft. from the top of the bluff where a minimum of 100 feet is required by code. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Testimony was given by the architect as to when the owner purchased the property in 201-8, and the existing_conditions of the site, with the disposition of the structures needing legalization. There was a pre-CO issued in 1985, #Z-13828 for a one family dwelling with accessory garage. The Pre-CO states that the existing house and garage are on a lot with insufficient width & area. The accessory garage is located in the front yard, and the dwelling has insufficient setback from the bluff. In April of 2002, a variance was issued granting a second-floor addition to the existing garage with the condition that the upper floor be used for storage only. In May 2002, a CO (#Z-28423)was issued for the completion of this project. At the hearing the Board asked he applicant and his agent if one variance could be removed by re-locating the proposed accessory building in the front yard to a conforming front yard setback. The agent subsequently submitted a survey showing the location of mature trees that would need to be removed or whose roots would be severely damaged in order to locate the proposed accessory structure with a conforming principal front yard setback on the subject property. The applicant indicated that he did not r f major damage to the existing mature trees. �l �� �'`1 T 2 9 2019 �oui;r,J ;,yvn l Page 3, October 24„2019 #7325,Lewis SCTM No. 1000-40-1-8 A report from New York Sea Grant was received on October 8, 2019 in reply to the applicant's request for technical observation and review which also stated that possible risk of erosion to the bluff face would likely occur if any work, other than the replacement of the top decking was to be done to the as built deck located at the top of the bluff. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: - The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on October 10, 2019 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: I 1. Town Law X267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The neighborhood consists of narrow and very deep lots all fronting on CR 48 and along Long Island Sound, similar to the subject property which is screened from the road, and neighboring properties by mature vegetation.The proposed accessory building in the front yard, as built garden shed and second floor additions to the existing house will not be seen form the other adjacent properties or the street. Decks on the rear/waterside of the properties and steps down to the beach in this neighborhood are commonplace. 2. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The existing dwelling has a non-conforming bluff and side yard setback so any additions within the footprint would require variance relief. The proposed accessory buildings in the front yard cannot meet the principal front yard and side yard setback without moving a pre-existing garden ,shed or removing a number of mature trees so variances are required. 3. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial. Setback for accessory buildings account for 20%, 80% and 76% relief from the code; setback for the deck is 100% relief and setback for the single-family dwelling is 39% and 67%. However, the proposed second floor additions to the existing dwelling are within the existing non-conforming side and bluff setback footprint and will not further reduce those setbacks. The proposed and existing accessory buildings in the front yard are allowable by code as long as they meet the front and side yard setbacks for a principle structure; but due to the narrow width of the property, and the existence of mature trees, setback variances are needed for these accessory structures. However, they are well screened from both the road, and neighboring properties by existing mature trees and evergreen screening. As for mitigating the impacts of the existing deck at the top of the bluff, both Suffolk County Soil and Water,-and NY Sea Grant came to the same conclusion in their included reports that the bluff face is currently fully vegetated and stable, and any relocation and/or removal of the existing deck structure would open the bluff up to erosion that would take years to mitigate with planting, and therefore do more harm to the bluff than leaving it in place and replacing the top decking and stair treads only 4. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(4). No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code and the conditions of the Suffolk County Soil &Water District, and the findings of the NY Sea Grant report. 5. Town Law t 267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or cons limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time f ur ea 0 n IF QCT 2 9 2019 SclA1,,,!J Tcvin Bo,ird 9f Tii,,s 2S i i r Page 4, October 24,2019 #7325, Lewis SCTM No. 1000-40-1-8 6. Town Law X267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a pre-existing waterfront deck, proposed second floor addition, pre-existing garden shed and proposed accessory storage building in the front yard, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Lehnert, seconded by Member Planamento, and duly carried, to GRANT the variances as applied for, and shown on the site plans and building plans (Pages A-100, A-200, A- 300) prepared Anthony M.Portillo,Architect, of AMP Architecture,LLC, and dated May 21, 2019. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The proposed accessory storage building in the front yard shall remain unconditioned and unfinished space as noted on the accessory building floor plan. 2. The proposed limited replacement in kind of the as built seaward top decking and stair treads shall be subject to the approval of the Board of Town Trustees Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. In the event that an approval is granted subject to conditions, the approval shall not be deemed effective until the required conditions have been met; and failure to comply therewith will render this approval null and void. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Pursuant to Chapter 280-146(B) of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured, and/or a subdivision map has-not been filed with the-Suffolk County Clerk, within three (3) years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may, upon written request prior to the date of expiration, grant an extension not to exceed three (3) consecutive one (1) year terms. V the Board: Ay : Members Weisman (Chairperson),Dantes, Acampora,Planamento and Lehnert. (5-0) l I ` E V'l(�n E 1 f � V E Leslie K nes Weis n, Chairperson L' Approved for filing/6 / /2019 OCT 2 9 2019 Soutiho'd Town Board of Trustees iL 11 s `� — RECEIVED 2 -73Q.0 OCT 092019 Zoning Board Of Appeals UM MEMORAND CMejmbers isman, Chair f the Zoning Board of Appeals OCT 2 9 2019 From: Mark Terry,AICP Assistant Town Planning Director , in LWRP Coordinator Southold ,T Board of Trusteste e Date October 9, 2019 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for ZBAile Ref BRION LEWIS#7325 SCTM No. 1000-40-1-8. BRION LEWIS #7325 - Request for Variances from Article III, Section 280-15; Article XXII, Section 280- 116A(l); Article XXIII, Section 280-124; and the Building Inspector's May 1, 2019, Amended May 31, 2019 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct additions and alterations to an "as built" accessory building, legalize an "as built" accessory garden shed and an accessory deck, and construct additions and alteration to an existing single family dwelling; at, 1) accessory building located less than the code required front yard setback of 50 feet; 2) accessory building located less than the code required side yard setback of 15 feet; 3) "as built" accessory garden shed located less than the code required side yard setback of 15 feet; 4) "as built" accessory deck located less than the code required 100 feet from the top of the bluff, 5) single family dwelling located less than the required side yard setback of 20 feet; 6) single family dwelling located less than the required 100 feet from the top of the bluff; located at 62615 County Road 48, (Adj. to Long Island Sound) Greenport,NY, SCTM No. 1000-40-1-8. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, the proposal is recommended as INCONSISTENT with the below LWRP policies. Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances conamarnity character,preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. The as-built accessory buildings were constructed without obtaining required review or permits. As- built development does not minimize adverse effects of development, sets precedent and reinforces a traditional land use pattern of the Town of Southold that is not supported. The proposed action does not meet this policy. Policy 4 Mmnnize the loss of life, structures, and natural resources fi-0777 flooding and erosion. J The as built 296 sq. ft. deck if not associated with the function of a stair is not permissible on the bluff Pursuant to Chapter l 11 Coastal Erosion Hazard Area of the Southold Town Code. The 32' setback from the top of bluff to the single-family residence poses risks to the dwelling from erosion and loss during storm events. Policy 6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands. The top of bluff line is not accurate (see Figure 1) and therefore the as built deck is not permissible. A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southold Town Board of Trustees laws and regulations for all Andros Patent and other lands under their jurisdiction. 1. Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth in Trustee permit conditions. The 296`sq. ft. deck located seaward of the top of bluff is not permissible and does not comply with statutory requirements pursuant to §275-11. Construction and operation standards: A. General. The following standards are required for all operations within the jurisdiction of the Trustees: a Platforms. Plmended 10-11-2005 bi,LL. •1'o. 17-2005.-JO-9-2012 by L.L. ATo. 12-2012) ( Platforms may not exceed 200 square feet and must be landward of the top of bluff. The deck extends seaward of the top of bluff. OCT 292019 DD, �7,r;y';�r."" 'a5;r.+' .G. :r'=,,;7 r`t•'y., f:...."tr'r,:;}a• T��_ 7,...,g,..: e°.3' .<` .a;,•+"K' '`�1` • rJ.' t s ,z,`. z �,'+_ N� tr �'«k"q c;^,_: ^tx.a�,1,'. ,��. :: ,�k .c;•�- � ..s-e'r�•x"„:f',.�`, ,, ”-f•,, '`�.,�r�� =z4t• :�;�:, .r• �t�:� ,;--�" �.�z-.�•., Y -f' t)K`,�;�,y,�M(3'. .. ,�i.ta Ff ,• uQe'' zt�t f`pn:!•S n �.�..' 3§ ..-e�f 1`�``.�fyt`x� r �p ,r. r�rl'�.f a. ;�;>,_r« �r"<r"��`'- .r ✓'9:.v :,.;, 3;F,,r`.:�,;;:..c;�:y,'s -x ,• .,�`-.:;� Y.'�r+t �: a'4 a.a�aR'� : C ,�' "��� .tr; .� P:'.<','r.ia , ,'f ,j,,,r Y.t^•�t,�� �,�,: ' �,,�s, ,, r,�,yr,, �4,�, '�• - ti= � g.�c.:r"S��=y�•,T=a`-fv'a .T.-sa= =��}�;`'��,-'l `�`+S�z�..sf n�-r��i.�i:':-''Lx"`�'r _v °�' :.-s`kyr. -;t� - tr 'A+s ,-dry:",sa :%.r .1 ;£ -.;.i��{..t`�•,r,,,.:.'"� �'a;k'.e.>�,y:.-=a4':'�''¢,'�'', '�'"` d3.�'���i3�t"• �,r- '-n. �,,�...::g',....,�„•.:,C zr,'.".. �:'.4w ,-(,r x :t»w.;a, u+{t^5,'', r,r' r [cam ar,+.+.`���+fit°4�, r', {r.,' ''t;::�i< ,iN^^ a;' 'd,.;F;g�r' P• °�[S "1t�. .�":}�. ..+:. C" s g '..:',..i ^�:lP >..aTY• ,..fir •`3•'Au .s ..,'�4,"E'3.r'�?.'SY•'x*:. ,aM1$tY .. p' •"4t`�*'s� rar _Y",:r'J'J'r''rJ,r 'je�":_'�:>;�. .,qr��,""_t'w-3 _ 'u p .:.;i Y;; !� 4M1rv�,rr•t#t..��.i,s;i Y ��( �' d .•I•,•`.'�•' ,t <�: j�4. - ' " T,-a 1.:.'t�' S�tt n« �.Y+"`r"� .... � �;.•_»"r: ,. r.. - - �' F. Ott � ,.4'4';.�'.=., „�_. f�, .�' � ':r'e" 's t3,r i- - "s ,.d 'v g" -.. x. Y,S "yr:y�•.�V-j '"'C. s y ..u:i .r,,a, .�. a`:d``a ..i ,°!*t'w"�":t"•r-t;`;,,. .e�'��.. ...,<.:'.:. ?T>�.`"" ��` - �tS�Li}�/ •aha r .�,tt +�'�. y.};.•.:." .-�s^� :i.n -- �<.. "J...,.•, L�(..S_ ARM,� r \• ".:gF.�;' ,�y,r*w�y`id;.;:R ^.�: ,::t`r'h • '-WC,}. ';s i_k •r3. _ _ 'f>^ •'�` >t..'.'e-;'°.:,z��;�'"y�-�'. •- .�,:e^:.�:•.s'':or;a _ 4jfn-.,t��'�`i;'�Y:`r '?.3`� `;,,•' >+Y.�,.N ��ryt,Y.S _',�;`, - '" .,�:-a',v�`.F:;, «cla•�'_ 'G�:; ,ih,='�� ;.�/n'. �'�',-,r. •.✓mac�K��' .,�{n^.•`�•�-• x='t -�r.�`x:�-,�..'i'a "���}a..;.,` j .ar. sr� o}:U�':e{k-` �'' ::y-.�"it; c;; Rs},a"ipa 1" i'^• n<;;''6, ..a'`'xA",•�c. r:1b.,;'(._ 'J'w ,t' ,y:'k',, ,'i•.i4.•3!:'t,•�7.i. ,r ^� �?;t:�.7.�:?�'%t',.�*k'i+4' ,L•.�t{ :a`":•a�}"e•;s�ni1 ''i �ir', °",a `ri'.z_,s'. .%'�;•�� �, 'f. `,� "•?�Yy''1.�"'""�"F�tz,T37�'_ii��;�"`a• i��y.Y!='�a�d�+• �.�i"ar 1�,. ::R,�+:?s.�''u.�t` ir;�� _a �', <��- ,•a r', 'trr'+ L` T. �,-,a. .�;T; •-,a i„ x.r-�,s�..�'^^ 3 r�•;.. "; ��3tg � ,'��Y c�,:`�� `c :.. _ :s,.�,,,.a'.:�*�."s•� :s;:.. �..,.4�'¢`s:a,.a ert.� ,.�� .d;:�. a �� �,„l' r•3�',�,,:� :���,':: r�'',. �.�,`F' E a Vii' ed;�;.v-,'.,.... +•h-. ei'S`.,;. 'Y•*'.s 1y!},, i..Y•�M1i: .�::..r. ,t:r�....b"u:}•^ `p:"?:o' -°,�' ':1: •'��4' ',7 r . ,r~t,.i�., ti.4,a�7�,' "�•'�F�,�w,. -g k:.�a, q,�'^• C'�.., �e_ .ra ,d:;.,:.1(;e '�'•• ro• - °A m"a e. ,.'KSR..1'r' t, .•I„c:,., �Si`1A".at,... 7-' •S' <'''{;? `r•i 2-`"`",.tyri '^"�..y;. .t,f�?%7•,, r _4 y ,L• � •a'� •'� /% T•F:i`�.Y.f.�.�-�,`G. �iP�- � A -t�.,..'r,^_.�.�3”. ,�.„< r;.,• � e�"�t,'y�.. ;tom, _ ;4, j;,v 4,3• s3;.-. �4',M1�'r+P" o f :a, .:. a..rJfit" >i^S' "d: , �^"`*''l.: ,w s,,; cas.- rt<.:1p".'!,rw`�tc �,, <c�•a.:�3' y r �'p i' r'd%'C• ''A' '...t <'`a:°'a �rR •','t• // / ems.,. ;",S:,r,�t � •.` t«.p;'a, ^'A, ` r � ''>;'i',.;ur:!' � g .w F Ccsµ°' .`:yt-• y' g','.^'r :`®'' =o- 'S.••}}pp z „> :sF:,4 .Y„ �M x.Ri' .a'-". '),- A $' .kY Y v � a.,{• Zl P +�a-Y�r;�` ;a;;�;° ,_ :; `j� wr'f'.�a- .Va '• 'a>s.]�, "= '� r �`'(�3`;.;aT�.".a^`ti•,• �r'�;• .�, .^PjY4'Fh �"':., S,` •�. "y�7t �,'YK'S w.. 3.t4"r..Ys��+"L•'. `P.'a`F. y .,,y ap..• ���". .',�. +' 'e". ,4 a, -`*Ce„'k3 .�.J�•,z�,2„� .,;. �;�'•,�!„S,- t,nf r :���r..i.`•.::(.S n`�f, ,f£s•c :�,��f`”.fi' .,`E 4:r ','�,d;..` ,}rs�3:.: �'•.5j-',``y:.' a-s%;.'4.T.`�-�•ac $ -3,tdes'(.''j t y..�A"-14A. a�� fi >~•u:z. y $ /. q' ,y.� .,F.,.; &s,',,;•.:, :'�'r;:es ' .3'h'. n,''S3.. a-F F'•T' "' "'JJJ .f'." ',?•' �" :.a--'.A,'. `��s.-':,,'`, ,t, ' _ai`.' t"' ",i;`'M.r +°• ;i; ''r r`" -1 •�L4g �f .,t•', 'r/ .�'.,. Fp.? ��`. 7. - R y...," 8' PaeY,." ,�„'Y♦ - .. -r.tb. :-T;-xry �N � •rF •r:.',c�:. AAAtt�,.,,,� f, .JJ:'."",,.�a vC'. .,tS; ..... ..''�N. }} a�}'�f;3,y: ti ` 1 Jl�nfty.Y ' �'' .'.u•.':" .�.�. d `hw _:« t �a?~ y:i `SsweY,/ ��'•Go J, Y' ,��. •�.,�"•°!yry., dr a ^c. � �/' 'f"4`± :. 's2_r' k.-=1t%+•�� °r. 'ta�' .�±'•;, � les` a,*:. :x�:.•}r,�•i '•l:, ,� s�;2u��ta .:1� � '�y :t'yr w,.;,,v�`.k t�. ,."�2-cw. 'r'�'a�,ITr�.,��, . it. �a3�.jf^.:;Y• �`• _ i ,_�.'i �`:..."'R 'Z •4. :x.��^ 'r�,'`•.. yt, _,g 'v S.S' nY`';i-Y; }j 1 v'.' ::t.• �` 'a.,_ .,,ph,�'' •��- it .�' <rS+sad r •� ti Yw1 A i�} a jai �•,' Mi.-i.. ��:,Vi2:.w'`i: '4�- :4t=i•�{>C xs' �.yy yy , t1 Z:'�e `� .jt rs t. h.t.ts,}" •C±?'� .t ix.a .b':,n} d,'17tit ' .f'~t Sd .r»•s�'. `.,t�.- � � ,` N � . �a'�t•`a� �,'Y.>'••.,'�; :E�,�(:r' �'}mss->:`,+.•."'r^+.i.;:- �X+., •r_" .�;.* �S>„adi^ ..ta.�k. . r• <.: �.+,iCYPi L; t t. f f ter'• .»i` `»�,�.a:;:.,t�^ '�:• `C<v�w.'2.";ir`z..'i..l,.ai e�!r;i: ��':•°e•';:;F a'.'at`"` } /• '.a+a.,; .yj .:s<�'. �`;ya b�,_,''�,;A:, 3'�• "°tuf° -''aa c,+,�'”; � .M;z ''%. �""c'' 7^• Z q i"•'Y ,t ,�a'i. }.``7 '°_,ei.}^'K-<t t. r'.,yr.� s"�•'••� `` �a'i���j?s47- �y=•..o"e �^ �xg4�, m �� �`, +r• n •,�t ,T'= - jti'''°ti` ',..:" ,i' 'r' ' `; i`-i,'1 .,:d' `t �:•r"s'K�. .-'' r d�- t^`� •{`,f:Ai` ."D�'!r. ti'i'`- ,�*�r .ur„`�, '»5.. s.:ut::;: ark. _. t.,=7;j:7`j�'+t;•'.' r_•`�'='�T, 's Yi °r. F �. �• r,• :'� �,,°��s <..�^ a_ SCP' k�' .` s rr:"�' �s�,;":,`'.�.'-';'-�;.::'•' ,.,.' .:T��s•,'e:'��''C� -y,.7•��'t=aa�a-Z3 r d .v`? .�.�.'.: s�,,. f,�t:" fi3: r, �,rr tr:Y• �s ,s,.n"3, .a. .sYt'' tt,, �%,s> :°:.' r .a:t a:'p.•i'S^ 't 9 �,C X R M �" :'�?ti••` §°6".�•� � a> :,�..�' °,�',.. ,».�- 't Figure 1. Top of bluff in relation to I' topographical contours and deck. The side yard and front yard setbacks are Exempt from LWRP review. Pursuant to Chapter 268,the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: William Duffy, Town Attorney OCT 2 9 2019 Southold Town B ar of Tiustees OFFICE LOCATION: ®� S®Uj�®l MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold,NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) cis Southold,NY 11971 ® a� Telephone: 631 765-1938 ®lyc®U LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Michael Domino, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, AICP LWRP Coordinator Date: September 16, 2019 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for BRION LEWIS & LESLIE SWITCH SCTM# 1000-40-1-8 AMP Architecture on behalf of BRION LEWIS & LESLIE SWITCH requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit for a revision to existing wood deck at top of bluff; portion to remain, 199 square feet seaward; wood landing to remain, 98 square feet seaward. Located: 62615 County Road 48, Greenport. SCTM# 1000-40-1-8 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with LWRP Policies 4 and 6.3 and therefore, INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. This recommendation was made based upon the following: -AAA .a` ss�a> 'SE'S$;°!,� ..-'iB.,:F d+n °•`a '.' .. .-',. -d-a`p° �• >' ;"-�'_f is ; jj ,•D�"'< P .<" �.', � ".gib"' a�'�7 � �� 4.'t .��" �r, �',�4q',a�. €t.. ."3 "c, a'��'• 4'x:9 I r ';gt`- '• � �i,f' +. t� #«y- '# '�y :,` :%fi^,;Y'4'� 't "" .s,,: e ` 'f .' h'•�. � � � �-<g^ p, ,max s�'�'+,,. iF s' 4 .e 84 3+. I - � `•,d".""` '':. A#4`"t�, z�� to .�. -� ;ti.�"";.,�W,sv'`" ,'' Figure 1. Subject parcel showing 1' topographical contours and deck location. ArcGIS indicates that the deck is built on/over the bluff. All development is prohibited on the bluff other than walkways and stairways pursuant to Chapter 111. Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas Article Il. Regulations § 111-14. Bluff area. The decks are not permissible. The proposed action does not meet Policy 6.3. The deck structures were constructed without obtaining a Wetlands Permit and`Coastal Erosion Permit Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Damon Hagan, Assistant Town Attorney 1 gI)f FDE,��� Peter Young,Chairman Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Lauren Standish,Secretary P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Telephone(631)765-1889 Fax(631)765-1823 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., ' September 11, 2019 the following recommendation was made: Moved by Caroline Burghardt, seconded by Caroline Burghardt, it was RESOLVED to SUPPORT the application of BRION LEWIS & LESLIE SWITCH for revisions to the existing wood deck at top of bluff, portion to remain, 199 sf. seaward, and wood landing to remain, 98 sf. seaward. Located: 62615 CR. 48, Greenport. SCTM#40-1-8 Inspected by: Peter Young, John Stein, Caroline Burghardt Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried C Michael J.Domino,President �� � Town Hall Annex John M.Bredemeyer III,Vice-President 54375�� 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Glenn Goldsmith `z s' � Southold,New York 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski Telephone(631) 765-1892 Greg Williams �(� n �� Fax(631) 765-6641 9 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES' 2 f: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD n&utbld Q �� E This Seciion For Office Use Only Coastal Erosion Permit Application AUG _,X Wetland Permit Application _Administrative Permit Tawn -Amendment/Transfer/Extensi Trus es 7Received Application: ---�-b._�7.8 ' - -- Received Fee: $ 500. Completed Application: Incomplete: SEQRA Classification: Type I^ Type 11 ✓✓ Unlisted Negative Dec. Positive Dec. Lead Agency Determination Date: Coordination:(date sent): .-- LWRP Consistency Asse���t orm Sent:. _T -7_" _ - - - Date of Inspection: e __ Receipt of CAC Report: Technical Review: M 74�public Hearing Held: Ml ` - __ - Resolution: t BRION LEWIS&LESLIE SIMITCH Owner(s)Legal Name of Property(as shown on Deed): Mailing Address: 62615 CR 48, GREENPORT,NY 11944 Phone Number: 646-512-0177 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - SECTION 40 -BLOCK 1 -LOT 8 Property Location: 62615 CR 48,GREENPORT,NY 11944 (If necessary,provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT(If applicable): AMP ARCHITECTURE 15400 MAIN ROAD,MATTITUCK,NY 11952 Mailing Address: Phone Number: 516-214-0160 c } Board of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA 47,465 SQ.FT. Land Area(in square feet):, R-80 Area Zoning: 1 FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Previous use of property: - - -- Intended use of roe 1 FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Covenants and Restrictions on property? Yes X No If"Yes", please provide a copy. - Will this project require a Building Permit as per Town Code? X Yes No y If"Yes",be advised this application will be reviewed by the Building Dept. prior to a Board of Trustee review and Elevation Plans will be required. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals? X Yes No If"Yes", please provide copy of decision. Will this project require any demolition asper Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept.? ; Yes X No Does the structure(s) on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy? X Yes No Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date BUIDING PERMIT#42310 01/19/19 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY#Z-29544 06/25/03 No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? X No Yes If yes, provide explanation: N/A_ Project Description (use attachments if necessary):- __ -__ -- -REVISION TO EXISTING WOOD DECK @ TOP-OF BLUFF,PORTION TO _ REMAIN, 199 S.F.SEAWARD -WOOD LANDING TO REMAIN 98 S.F. SEAWARD Board of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: -REVISION TO EXISTING WOOD_ DECK @ TOP OF-BLUFF, PORTION TO REMAIN-, 199 S-.F:SEAWARD -WOOD LANDING TO REMAIN, 98 S.F.,-SEAWARD , Area of wetlands on lot:_ 6,448 square feet i Percent coverage of lot: .__ 13.5 Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands:_ 0_- feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 0 feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? No _ _ Yes If yes,how much material will be excavated? N/A cubic yards How much material will be filled? N/A_ cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: NSA. _ feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: < 1% Manner in which material will be removed or deposited N/A - - _ -- Statement of the effect, if any,on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason.of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): WETLANDS ON PROPERTY WILL NOT BE A_FF_E_CT_EDBY THE PROPOSED AREA OF. WOOD DECK TO REMAIN Board of Trustees Appi3.cation COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity:. -REVISION TO EXISTING WOOD.DECK @ TOP OF BLUFF,PORTION TO REMAIN, 199 S.F.SEAWARD -WOOD LANDING TO REMAIN, 98 S.F.,SEAWARD Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? _ No X Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? X No Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated? NSA (cubic yards) How much material will be filled?_ NSA (cubic yards) -- ,i A Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: N/A ' Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts to the subject property or ! neighboring properties reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed, including erosion increase or adverse effects on natural protective features. (Use attachments if necessary) The proposed renovation to the existing wood,deck will result in a smaller surface area, decreasing the amount of impervious surface area on the property L 617.20 Appendix B .Short Environmental Assessment Form ,lttstr-uctions for.Completing Part 1 -Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part I-Project and Sponsor Information € Name of Action or Project: SIMITCH/LEWIS RESIDENCE Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 62615 CR 48, GREENPORT,NY 11944 -- ---------- ---^ - - Brief Description of Proposed Action: -- -REVISION TO EXISTING WOOD DECK @ TOP OF BLUFF, PORTION TO REMAIN, 199 S.F. SEAWARD -WOOD LANDING TO REMAIN,98 S.F.,SEAWARD F Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 516-214-0160 AMP ARCHITECTURE, PLLC. E-Mail:BEPPERSON@AMPARCHITE T.COM Address: - — - - - F 154_00 MAIN ROAD City/PO: -State: Zip Code: MATTITUCKNY 11952 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, -NO -, 'YES- administrative - 'YES_administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any-other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: SOUTHHOLD TOWN BUILDING PERMIT _� 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 0-02 __acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0.02 acres 4. Check all-land uses that-occur on;adjoining-and near the proposed action. E3 Urban El Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial WResidential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ]Aquatic ❑Other(specify): ❑Parkland Pagel of 4 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? D ID—Kil .❑ b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ❑ X❑ ❑ 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO , -YES, landscape? ❑ a 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES, If Yes,identify:' — -- - - ❑ 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO 1,YES a ❑ b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? F,-1 F] ' c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? ❑ 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES Ifthe proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? - NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: 'M FRI 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? V NO YES : If No,describe method forr p oviding wastewater treatment: X 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO !1, YES Places? b. Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? -� I ❑- 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? T-1 91 b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? n If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: ❑' 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply:' ❑Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ® Wetland ❑Urban R1 Suburban I5.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? gYES��_, l6. Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO If Yes, m a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ®NO E]YES b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: [:]NO ®YES STORMWATER DISCHARGE AS A RESULT OF THE NEW SECOND FLOOR -B I i - IAB-TO-NEW Mli�ATE1 LS Page 2 of 4 r 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of 'NO- YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size-. - Fx 1 ' 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed '-NO- ' YES- solid waste management facility? ` If Yes,describe: Fx�' ❑ 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: ❑' 1 AFFIRM-THAT-THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE-IS TRUE AN6 ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AMP ARCHITECTURE,LLC Applicant/sponsor e: Date: -- - - - - ----- - - -- - --- - -- Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the.following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part I and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur, occur I., Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning s regulations? El 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? ❑' _ 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate 1 _reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? ❑ _ 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: n a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? ❑ 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? ❑D 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? ❑` Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact ' may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage, rj( problems? El 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? a Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and ' cumulative impacts. 6 EJCheck this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Town-of Southold-Board of Trustees Name of Lead Agency �1 D eat c h y e l J. Domino _ President Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Respo ' 1e OfficerIn Ceifd Agency Signature of Preparer(if different front Responsible Officer) PRINT Page 4 of 4 5 . f , Board of Trustees App? ation AFFIDAVIT BRION LEWIS&LESLIE SIMITCH BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE TS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS)AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ' ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S),IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION,I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES,THEIR AGENT(S)OR REPRESENTATIVES,INCLUDING THE t . CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL,TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO ,INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS APPLICATION, INCLUDING A FINAL INSPECTION. I FURTHER AUTHORIZE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY AND AS REQUIRED TO INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ANY CONDITION OF ANY WETLAND OR COASTAL } EROSION PERMIT ISSUED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES DURING THE TERM OF THE PERMIT. L • igmture of Property Owner S a e of Prope weer SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS, C!A DAY OF -20 I Q1 OONNIE O.BUNCH - Notary Public,State of New York - '__.-Notary Public No:01 BU618S050 Clualffied in Suffolk County t;ommission Expires Aoril 14,2 Board of Trustees App] ation AUTHORIZATION (Where the applicant is not the owner) I I/We, BRION LEWIS&LESLIE SIMITCH owners of the property identified as SCTM# 1000-040-01-08 in the town of GREENPORT New York,hereby authorizes = F AMP ARCHITECTURE,LLC to act as my agent and handle all i necessary work involved with the application process for permit(s)from the Southold Town Board of Trustees for this property. t __L__ z Pro rty Owner's Signature Pr6peOwner's Sig ature : SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS__ 1 ' 1 DAY OF_ 120 V 1 Notary Public CONNIE Q.BUNCH ' Notary Public,State of New York No.01 SU6165o5o Qualified in Suffolk County ^ommission Expires April 14,2 r P \ APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the cart of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: 2XI on. Uj-.0 L (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION:(Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO 1 If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of-the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this &dayof�_3,)Li _,20 �l l Signature r Print Name - �1 (/ Ar Lu S APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM k The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: Leslie Simitch (Last name,first name,middle lnitial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.H so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION:(Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance Trustee Permit x Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP VA Submitted this ay.0 W,2Ll Signatu Print Name CONNIE D.BUNCH Notary Public,State of New fork No.01 BU6165050 l Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires April 14,2 U0 t i APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM ` - x The Town of Sotithold's Code of ' o ` l " s.Te: usc scot' iffnshw I form is to provide ieforination which can alertthe town'of possible conflicts of mteitst and allow tt-to take whnte_v_er action�s ncces-sary"to avoid same. 1 YOUR NAME: AMP ARCHITECTURE,PLLC (Last name,fust name,griddle-initial, �yyou nh ! m > - of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other f person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) e Tax grievance Building Variance = Trustee Change of Zone - " Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring - s Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other ; (If"Other,name the activity.) Do you personally(or through you'r'company, pduse,sibling,parent;or cliild)hove i relationship with'tCny:vfficeror,employee of the T.own";ofSouthold? "Relationship"lncludes,byblood,rgarringd bi-iusihdss interest.`-`Business;intcresr means a business, including a partnership,in which the town -oflicer or,ciifployee liras even a p5rtial owners p.of_(or employment`by)'a corpoi+don in which the town otficer,oremployeg'b% more than-5%,ofthe shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold_ Title or position of that person- Describ "the,rclationship between youtgelf(the dpplidantlagent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check 'tire appropriate'line A)througb.D)andlor describe m ji'the,space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): -A),ilic,owner-of gNwerthgn_5%of the"shares of ilie corporate stock of the applicpt (when:the applicanUs n corporation);- 13)ithe legal or bi:neticial:oWner of any-interest:in a;non-corporate entity(when the applicant is--nota corporaddii); C diioor,purinei, iwoffccr, or employee:of.the applicant;or ) . . _. _, "D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP ` Submitted this -lit day '00ttl 20'lei Signature _ Print Name Form TS I lr — U.S. Postal Service" CERTIFIED © RECEIPT■ 0 ■ L •• I I I• ■ r I Nru • ru • ' . - _ • i ru ASTQ}i i'�1Y�111 r ORt£ I rg NE g Llgt � y rl .�? Mx 1.1,a +€ Certified ` t` �z°d7 • j €rte I p Certified Mail Fes $3 s t J - , Maf(Fee s tti 11971 Iv $ _ 02 -t,! _ 1971 EXtra SeNICeS&Fees(check box,,add fee 1 Extra SONIces&Fees(checkbox 7 i ;''a 1 j- ❑ Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ §�dP.rpLWAte) C3 ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) a$fefte ' ��- 02 Q ❑Return Receipt(electronic - �Retum Receipt(electronic) Q ) $_ $r_ t,4� Po �`\ C3 ❑CertlfledMa,IR $ - I .r� ��p\�b� I r ❑Certified Meil eReRestRequired Delivery $ �k_ fj (yft / , p 1 estquied Delivery $ Ia BA.o�I. �'"'�n I-- � �ti979 ��I DAdult Signature Required 3 ❑Adult Signature Regwred $ •r;� � v $' Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ I•i ❑Adult Slgnature Restricted Delivery$ C3 Postage �' Q w OO Postage Er $�■$C \ � /1 fy,,,,,1�� I 'O Tota,Postage and F Total Postage and Fes \•� -t+f21J1 J $ •$ 09/1Y1rr +719 Iti Sent To Sent To ThOmC ----- Box an A' ry£ o;;or P�e� Street andApG No.,or Pd Box N. �'""'�' x o. "" t- ?0 ---------- rn - --------- N I Crb S---------" a- ><� .SIS+- �nu� u►�e + ------- HQ ----s�'� cr ,ware,zrP+ate ____ _-___ I p� ----------- :r r ., Iv �I0 ----------- f I j ■ a -- CO o ■ cc ®. • rti ru Q— Certified Mall Fee }ti $ $3.Sd 0971, lExtra Services&Fees(checkbox,add fee t12 ❑Return pA Receipt(hardcopy) $ j V:7"ta) O ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ 11Certdled Mail HeaMcted Delivery $ Postmark I IC] ❑Adult signature Required $ k Lam+-- Here ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ Q Postage Q- $ Qtotal Postage and F h1 M1 Sent To E3 D StreetandpAPt.NoeQo—OBox-lU---------- --------------,—,-`-c `o B.0x OV ---------- c)iysreC:ziP+4� ----------- f I PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: STATE OF.NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK residing at being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the day of , 20 , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names-, that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTI - +D MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. Sworn to before me this Day of , 20 Notary Public Michael J. Domino,President �y�S�FFO( y Town Hall Annex John M. Bredemeyer II1,Vice-President 61,`�� G$��� 54375 Route 25 Glenn Goldsmith y ;' P.O Box 1179 A.Nicholas Krupski 0 � Southold,NY 11971 Greg Williams yp Telephone(631)765-1892 U Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD --------------------------------------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of BRION LEWIS & LESLIE SIMITCH COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING THIS FORM IS TO BE COMPLETED AFTER POSTING REMAINS IN PLACE FOR AT LEAST SEVENDAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE SCVCN'CAf1 , residing at/dbaW-��g OQ / O4O (I J being duly sworn, depose and say: That on the k I day of 5 "P-1- , 2011 , I personally posted the property known as do �--rte: vl Pd(4 by placing the Board of Trustees official poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wednesday, September 18, 2019. Dated: q -f�-)� (signature) Sworn tobef re me this )911-day of ScP 20 I� CAROLINE M MACARTHUR 7 NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No.01 MA6384635 Qualified in Suffolk County otary Public My Commission Expires 12-17-2022 C PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS ® Complete items 1,2,and 3. Ign [3 Agent Nam Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ❑ dDeliv ee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailplece, dre B• ec ed' ( ' ted Name) C. f Delivery or on the front if space permits. l Z- 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is de res different from item 1? Yes �� If YES, ag1g,,eliver a)res5 below: ❑No 1gss6ON IIIIIII III III�I�II�I I�IIIII 'llllllllll ❑dul3. t8gnature� r`/ ❑Registered Mail— pre ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted 9590 9402 4483 8248 9784 83 ❑Certified Mails Delivery Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise _2._Article Number(transfer from service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTm ❑Insured Mail ❑Signature Confirmation STA ,17 0190 0000 2791 2288 I ❑Insured Mail Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery (over$500) Ps Form,3811,July 2015 PSN,7530-02;000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt COus 1 i residing at G ``0 0 0 0�-100r"Q &� being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 0)4'y\ day of , r, 20 101, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set torth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office ati d , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. Sworn to before me this Day of S1°(?kmb&, 20__19—. Lori T McBride NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK �n Registration No.Suffolk ountY 7 `'bLtn.C/"r '� Qualified in Suffolk County Notary Public Commission Expires December 11,2021 I / _)ARCHITECTURE Operating Business Address:1075 Franklinville Road,Laurel,N.Y.11948 Brooklyn Office:204 251'Street,Suite 203,Brooklyn,NY 11232 LLC Business Phone:(516)214-0160 1000-40-1-9 Kenneth Friedman 203 E 13th Street APT.4A New York, N.Y. 10017 1000-40-1-7 Thomas Zoitas 21-16 31St Avenue Suite 1 Long Island City, N.Y. 11106 I 1000-40-3-1 Kace Li LLC PO Box 67 Greenport, N.Y. 11944 NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the Southold Town Board of Trustees at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. OWNER(S) OF RECORD: BRION LEWIS & LESLIE SIMITCH SUBJECT OF PUBLIC HEARING : For a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit for a revision to existing wood deck at top of bluff; portion to remain, 199 square feet seaward ; wood landing to remain, 98 square feet seaward. Located : 62615 County Road 48, Greenport. SCTM## 1000-40-1 -8 TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING : Wednesday, September 18, 2019 — at or about 5 :30P. M . If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are available for inspection prior to the day of the hearing during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. BOARD OF TRUSTEES * TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631) 765-1892 Town of Southold LWRP-CONSISTEMMASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1.. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This F assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and'other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town,of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. .A :pioposetl ,,acdoxr-will'-lie--evaluated" as, la its-,sianificant I lieneficialrancl=adverse,effects:uporLtliecorital area(wl5icliinclucles:all:of SoiitholdTov►►n):.. - - - --- _ ---- _,,v I 3; If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Tlws, eiich answerFYmust be exnlaine-&-in_detail lis'ting'lioth.suunortinF:an&a%on suonor mg.h cts. If an action cannot be-certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it-Adll riot'be'dfidertakdJr. w , A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website(southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees`Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF STTE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM#040 = - 8 t PROJECT NAME, _._'SIMITCH/LEWIS RESIDENCE The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees .❑! 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate'response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g.capital = construction,planning activity,agency regulation,land transaction) (b) Financial assistance(e.g.grant,loan,subsidy) (c) Permit,approval,license,certification: a' Nature and extent of action: -REVISION TO EXISTING WOOD DECK @ TOP OF BLUFF, PORTION TO REMAIN, 199 S.F. SEAWARD-- WO ' -WOOD LAND ING�TO REMAIN, 98 S.F.,SEAWARD Location of action: 62615 CR 48,GREENPORT,NY Site acreage:. 1.1 Present land use:-R-80,SINGLE FAMILY USE Present zoning classification:. R-80 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: - (a) Name of applicant: AMP ARCHITECTURE,LLC (b) Mailing address: 15400 MAIN ROAD,MATTITUCK, 11952 , (c) Telephone number:Area Code( ) 516-214-0160 (d) Application number,if 44: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes E. No-0, If yes,which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. ME,VE-LOPE D'COAST POLICY: Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space,makes efficient use of infrastructure,makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and - minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. WJ;Yes F! No F-1 Not Applicable THE PROPOSED DECK REVISION MAINTAINS THE COMMUNITY-CHARACTER,_PRESERVES -- OPEN SPACE,MAKES-EFF-ICIENT USE OF INFRASTRUCTURE,AND GOOD USE OF THE _._COASTAL LOCATION AND MINIMIZED ADVERSE EFFECTS OF DEVELOPMENT Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria 0, Yes .0 No © Not Applicable THE PROPERTY HAS NO HISTORIC OR ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOUCES. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria .❑ Yes Q No 0 Not Applicable THERE ARE NO-SCENIC-RESOURCES ON THF PROPERTY TO -- - ` PROTECT Attach additional sheets if necessary - NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages S through 16 for evaluation criteria -l Yes'E]'No 1:1 Not Applicable - REDUCTION OF EXISTING DECK ON WATERFRONT SIDE OF THE PROPERTY 227 - SQ.FT.LOCATED AWAY FROM FLOODING HAZARD PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE X• EXISTING-WOOD-DBCK T-S IN A-DESTGNATED CEHA AREA REDUCTION OF DECK SIZE WTT.T__RF.DUC R ADVERSE AFPFCTSTQ THE .BLUFF Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria • ©` Yes F1' No F1 Not Applicable -PROTECTION OF WATER QUALITY TH-ROTTC;r4.g coRmwATEg nISCI-IARGE,RELOCATION- Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. M o o: i Yes No Not Applicable -PROPERTY IS NOT T.00ATED TN THE WETLANDS N(_�R_ WTT_.T.WORK — TNTFRITPT. COASTAT.FTSFi-A--NDS WTT.D T.TFF. Attach additional sheets if necessary - - Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑_Yes '❑ No❑ Not Applicable -PROPOSED WORK WILL NOT AFFECT AIR QUALITY. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluatiop criteria. Kl Yes 0,No ❑ Not Applicable -ALL WASTE IS CONTROLLED AND ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRI WILL BE DISPOSED-OF PROPERLY PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. 0. YesCl No© Not Applicable -THIS IS A PRIVATE PORPERTY THAT HAS NO PUBLIC ACCESS OR R_AFFECTS PUBLIC SPACES,NOR ITS NEIGHBORS Attach additional sheets'if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. .Q Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable -EXISTING DECK REDUCTION IS AT A PRIVATE-RESIDENTIAL SITE Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes . ❑ Not Applicable ` ❑ No -EXISTING WOOD DECK REDUCTION WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH MARINE F RESOURCES- Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. .Yes Q No❑ Not Applicable - PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL SITE THAT HAS NO AGRICULTURAL LANDS Attach additional sheets if necessary - - - - Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable -F.XSITING WOOD DECK REDUCTION DOES NOT APPLY TO ENERGY CODES- PREPARED ODES PREPARED BY:_AMP_ARCHIECTURE,=PLLCi :Tq—,t AGENT DATE � �o