Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
TR-9461
`gUfFat Michael J. Domino, Presidentoozy Town Hall Annex John M. Bredemeyer, III, Vice-Presidents 54375 Route 25 Glenn GoldsmithN C'•' P.O. Box 1179 rV7A Nicholas Krupski Southold, NY 11971 Greg Williams ��1 , , ��� '' Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE ACTIVITIES CHECKED OFF BELOW INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line/silt boom/silt curtain 1St day of construction �( % constructed /'' When project complete, call for compliance inspection; .,, ,+ •. -_ .1�:�,0•'r�`••. ,• .-'Q11''fll"' - '•1111••'1'111°• -- .•0401•ill%.• .\yll•'ill%j'' .''i111 Ili%"i - ` '!11 /%°r•.. 11 I%°;• y /Ir,: :� p'• :\ )•'• )r' __� - � � �., e wqo•... � Z _ '- � »nw...,'� e �;r., e �-\��i1. = -!!%� .'3>, _ fi- _t '•! , ""t e '�d -_ 1'- Ir""�\e. - µ4•- iF^�i, -- ,�� i'`lil � �;\�•' _ .r.....:a�.r�x:.�. .r�•�,,� .•rt rn,�,•..., „�x;,,,.�.tmm»»n•+,.,tml^�,,..rrc.�„�^'�,.,,,,,•,rym,.....,.,ern„n,,,•»»,mc..,�»,,.,,,.m',r.•n:.no•rn,:....,,,vr.:.•„-,,...;.,7'•».,-;,-�f..r._.JJ - '�.,en�. I •5'�f '� BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES ,> { = ,SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK `�. PERMIT NO. 9461 DATE: MAY 15,2019 :r ISSUED TO: LCMG FINY,LLC c/o LESLIE GOSS R °r 4; PROPERTY ADDRESS: 3773 CLAY POINT ROAD,FISHERS ISLAND ',�w F SCTM# 1000-2-1-14.1 ,r•' AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on MU 15, 2019, and in •r u� hil consideration of application fee in the sum of $250.00 paid by Leslie Goss and subject to the Terms and h `` ;oRyti Conditions as stated in the Resolution, the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following: r� Wetland Permit to retain and reconstruct±151 linear feet of existing 8' wide fixed wood pier i v with handrails on each side, of which±120 linear feet is seaward of the AHWL; replace h�' handrails on each side of pier and install new decking; all of the cribs will be removed, including timbers and half of the stone from site with removed stone to be disposed of offsite; ,3 si the remaining stable stone at each crib location will be left in a stable mound to preserve habitat with new 12 inch Class B piles to be utilized for support of the pier for its full length; ,r install Thru-Flow decking for the full level length of the structure over the water; construct a _ transitional slope section of the pier from the mainland bluff to meet standard 1:10 maximum _ w gradient in order to provide 5 feet of clearance for pedestrian access along beach; installl � ;s =:ss+ ladders at strategic locations along the length of the pier,and bumpers/fenders at the end of the pier; and to replace three(3) tie-off piles and install one (1) new tie-off pile; and as depicted on ` the site plan prepared by Docko,Inc., received on May 3,2019, and stamped approved on May ,/•,;� 15,2019. Y, t ! t IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, ! - r , and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of the 15t'day of May,2019. ''_ i 4 +.1.:1: ogpfFO(�- v r _ - •r E Cpl. coo ��,-.tet,.._ ..-r� - ":.�z.!/J:G, `��;��• /)7 f Fj / I 1„r'i•�!� i o � � [.'J /lir.,ffc;L`iG 4'7-L t�d.�•v i 1 a ., ,fikJ •�� a� •-. vu vvu.•uvw\u,viwi••v,_a v»,yvfi,(iiSvui SaL»,v iv eai i,v ii•v.'Q.uuu�i••w •.•1:•Wi)»_., '••Dw.u•i•••y.•wu:•:.u<iw..�';.w,:•iv,v.Lv(Yu•:•iv %�� _ - - ,�^\�vil•: a •,.yi- - . t - - \\•\�9' � � �' l�' � .. � '\,vqf a i \`tr _ v.�r:y.. ,.. r _ 1 `,„,,��� A��' � �..^`..�, - �:. •-.n,.r: '- `./ra '�A� _',��`..v�`a iii%(` �� �-^rtrrrnn,,•,•n,.,m^C'�'/ �t•T• tlrrn,.,r nr^^�f.C� / �;;�`�mm.••nmm� �nr...�!� ��»urmm....,.mJ_'^'�/ ✓ 1�n"�^;*'S^M1„�;/! Ir`•1�� . .droll 1�-"'.r�� 1�;r ..�� 1�.. _ a,ai 11,.. .� N. r;�• N.• - rr�i 11s. 'iii is 11 - - viii adi::” = - %.ii i:IV Ali 1i)1;:•' _ °::+. ::::='•• iiaii.:.•' :%•ii;:.. TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Permittee LCMG FINY LLC c/o Leslie Goss residing at 3773 Clay Point Road, Fishers Island,New York, as part of the consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and prescribe to the following: 1. That the said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any and all damages, or claims for damages, of suits arising directly or indirectly as a result of any operation performed pursuant to this permit, and the said Permittee will, at his or her own expense, defend any and all such suits initiated by third parties, and the said Permittee assumes full liability with respect thereto,to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold. 2. That this Permit is valid for a period of 24 months,which is considered to be the estimated time required to complete the work involved, but should circumstances warrant,request for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date. 3. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely, or as long as the said Permittee wishes to maintain the structure or project involved,to provide evidence to anyone concerned that authorization was originally obtained. 4. That the work involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its agents, and non-compliance with the provisions of the originating application may be cause for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. 5. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. 6. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along the beach between high and low water marks. 7. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in the location of the work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigation,the said Permittee will be required, upon due notice,to remove or alter this work project herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southold. 8. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee of the completion of the work authorized. 9. That the Permittee will obtain all other permits and consents that may be required supplemental to this permit,which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same. 10. No right to trespass or interfere with riparian rights. This permit does not convey to the permittee any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of others in order to perform the permitted work nor does it authorize the impairment of any rights, title, or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person nota party to the permit. b c, 41 t r y r:jQ r 50 :. a '.w FISHERS ISLAND & v zz SOUND 22 46 29 -ti jFI` CtaY Pk` p 34t If �? NII=PROPERTY OF < _2..-. JABSCO LTO.PARTNERSHIP SITE ,:A J. ;� c A�S� �k25ae '4e�2"Ta•:, (5PRCJJEG 1' L7G1CtC 0 0 20001N YARDS y`.F�"'y_ '•;y :> _,, ycy•"�."'_.��.- i:'SJ�^r yr.�, '.. J TRECONSTRLACWN NOTES 1.ELEVATION DATUM 6 MEAN LOW WATER(MLWX 2'IIdE DATE IS TAKEN FROM 2016 NQAATEDETABLEra �-,µ;,:�: •:: .�,,�r;-�, � ;�::_';:: . REFERENM 51-VER EEL COVE BASED ON NEW LONDON.CT �,-- :?3 ►G„ ''-^ ?:";_ „: ;`My , 3.PROJECT C RIP710N:RE PA N AND •POOP F� RECONSTRUCT"M+/--)LF OF EXISTING 8-FT WIDE '< ;+ 'ROCKY LEDGE :;a °✓=w»y, FDW WOOD PER OF WHICH 1 +J-)LF 19 a h••"'r #f WA•TIERWARD OF THE AHWVSPRNG HIGH WATER UNE.INCWPING THE INSTALLATION OF THIR`tY N [ J ;.} :, s ~•''y.,;' `` ` PER SUPPORTED PILES OF WHICH TWEINlY FOL! �.,� EP WA'TERWARD OFTHE APP Hr-,H L�H WATER U 1 E C O TO»✓N a�'�.�OUTf--IOLD`: REMCNE THE TIMBERS FRoH FIVE E ocs-nNla FlI LFD CRIBS AND HALF OF THE Exs nNG ETON " WTH REMAINING STONE TO BE LEFT IN A STA i MAY - 3 2019 -- MOUND FOR HABITAT RETENTION.REPLACE THRE ©ISTING TIE,-OFF PILES AND INSTALL ONE NEW - TII~-OFF RLE,A.L AT AND WATERwARD OF THE, L� APPARENT HIGf -WATER UNE ON THE OPEN WA OF FISHERS ISLAND SOUND. _ Boar tl of t YsM 200 too o 200 d-.PROJECT PURPO-ce-THIS IS A PI'J�/ATE DOCK FOR RECI P,T)C)NAl BOATING.GW6 I .MOVAL AND THRU /� R �/y } �/ �p�� �y y /yR p��±} 4 a 'G7.lW.fVll Vii'VV 1'RR/TG.-M1I 7 yNt',Vt�R . i t ,•�. FLOW DECKING ARE TO PROMOTE EEL GRASS NORTt k >, GROWTH A*ID.STABLE STONE MOUND RETEt-MN IS MR J GEDDIS PANS '.` SOUTH: TO MAINTAIN EXISTING HABITAT DIVERSITY. PARSONS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ING. ROCKY LEDGE PARTNERS LLG ' 5,THESE APPUCATION DRAWINGS R04MSEW A 10 WEYBO55ET ST.5TE 1000 PO BOX✓t COMPILATION OF SURVEYS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL p ENCS,RI 02903 MONTCP IANIN,DE 1971O-0091 PERMIT PURPOSFS.THEY ARE NOT'CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.A'T'O"BUILdNG PERMIT MAY BE REWIRED. PROJECT: DOCK RECONSTRUCTION REQ 12-12.18 T.O.S. LOCATkX--k FISHERS ELAND-TOWN of SOL! TOLD N PROJECT DESCRIPPUCANT ION - WATERWAY: FISHERS ISLAND��- UNDSUFFOLK CCUNTY NEW Y� �¢ EI7,y APT�tJGAN 1'NAME DATE JANUARY 812m U o c K p i r, �PZEV •11 ISED 4- -19 T.O.S. APPUGAN'T- 1.0-10 FINY.LLC ° r . k. rROJECOE5CRt MN n , t• REVISED5-2-19 T.O rte. ,AGflN> SI 1irEi 1 OF 8 e n • �.° PRtJJEGTDESG�lPP1C7N DOCKO, INC. a Q 08 Keith B.Nel wi+PE 8892' �c` Mystic,CT 00355 �DFESS10 p� 860 57.2 6939 FAX 860 572 756.9 I7WG 17-09-2876 EMAJU offim@docko=m Y-.ei"�S.D:rs_�^,:.7xt=q lec �1�.�.siF1�'2�JS�J'3 G�>�l�r,�r i•+ern:t-tc•,t9,w h _'APPROVEDW IKE,,; T ES 1'O / lwOF u � LD AREA S EEL 4D :® TE FDOSTWO 7TH-op Pfl—=To f } S 1,, /ARBO EEL RAS fA !'V TlelpFF / '' �£ .81�f �W `r'&L;d?.•.Ti9l��F4".Ya+� 4 -� E?s75YlNGSi1 'ORT \ f '� � � 1 I �T/pLE TO i �r t\1dv'LER HGN WATER 3.65 OF EEL r- m:- _ =£a SLOPED PER NEW PER StJPPDRTF�L,E `�, ,• / , 'Chf AHWL GATE DECIq� I r E TING 7 F�lI.ES rt r I ,f` `/ Jg WATER 25k {.� i 1 ► i PROPERTY'Of TO f i / / LCMG MY,LLC N RELOCAM OLrr OFi � � : � 4D W°Tt?'1/E EXSTP45 COS TIMSE KS Aw_xna Clf STONE ro REMA+N ( j (r Yp t MEQ LOW WA I ��.. e.� -L! OF EEL ' � 3 T>;4✓��3��m ! WIF P€�C31�.#��'"`P�C�F? 12 .;..: 30 aA To o .. . '. . D45TirtG RNtS FmBu LV(� N>� E>QStNC m SU oRr PILE Cm TARS TWD AT WAl'ERWiAQD WOOD PER BECK EL 62FT REPLACS with PLE ND OF PER caul 9ECON_S iR.JCT 5U 7S,(Typ of 4) � 25 0.0— fir- ...,.....,rc�,.-'.'. rk" ...,.u. ...,..,w..s�,.-.•k:-.wr.2.. P�Xw:xa�,. a d`'�', �"b��`•.. ,.H ._ '�'`� - •' `1."P.c i�f�+�'"7f'�f GAAFHC SCAE l'-20' 7-71 20 10 ol 20 SURVEY by JAMES BE(NARDO LAND SJRVEYW_-LLC EL EVAT0N5 ARE BASED ON APPAREW LOW WATER PROJECT DG CK RECONSTRUCWN RaV15ED 1212-Z TD_5 LC7CAlt{7,,t 5 ISLAND-TOWN of SClJTH:X D ( PRO-ea NAME SUFFOLK C.aK Y.NL V YOW WAT�/AY: ISLAND S KEf FMViSW4-fl-1 T.O.S. DATE: JANUARY8.2M o c K o EXSTogs PIER PROFILE APPLJCANT' Xt*FW.LLC # rs~ REVISED 5-2.19 T.0.5. AGENT: _=AiEET 2 OF 3 ° E C E L�pKO, INC. _ Q68692'4 Myst,CT 06--,55 R P CD'R 860 572 8939 FAX 860 572 75W VWt, V-09-2876 Tl,1 - n..e-hr B Nei Wm C:xk�, 25"S, :?°q 2 :r-'t i�.^�s.i�4rg F�•e"mtt-2V;r]nc Southold Town Roard of-1rus ee • _.- ' 66aFi'A!_lEFW PER -_ NOM-nE-OFF PILES NOT SHCN+VJ IN THS VIEW REMOVE Q;Z5'TJP'IBERS,RE)-IOVE BEGMNS DECK EL 14:T5mF•r FOR G.AWTY OF PER AND as COMPONENTSFA REMAIN!GNSfT EA O 7A�5 IN _EASTtNG RAfLS TO BE E?CISTING 8-FT V+1a?E FKM t � RETA NED aid P tAINTA NW M-9 }Zu WOOD PER TO BE RETAINED o �! NEW PIER`SUPPORT MAINTAINED with NEW-NZ PILE'TOP ELEVATION AND GRATE DECKING C� 4-FTABOVE DECK O'YP �_ �'���si-1 � r - - 4-^ - q—_v.`x'=tF-.ti�.'rz,`,•Y,-�•.,r,. •-::"'qEi,k..'.•<:2i`�y-as.3.-'�ti..73•r�':wttvf �{.5.•�1'd'a,,�Y«:e5.j',`x��'s::4v•:Lc ti�,ar`.;.°yF�`3e••n'i i 'r.. '�✓yi5.y'i�lt'��"lt-'R�%".:•��.v-F+/•,'�t�'L-sG'.fC�xw .a• RW 25 BOTTOM SED�aVJ 0.0 ( •�?r<' ga ,.-ar�P>' !.4' r. �,3sti,,.ti*x,.•3 :�'-,4-�e,z.,t.ry:'+�.�.�.' ,ic=,'w,t''=s:r:cti�*',.',�•'• 1��j}?��.'F�`'s>.`�z�','`-;; 'fir• ."•,y ..env}a;4; e-`rel:.=:;�•i�r5'�'r'..:Y:'S:.vt t 1:3`.?:":�>•pw��y:Kyxi •�s�i%i�'A,c'�:a'•-x.._'^ r:'��a5.>,•a.-;•• Ili ti t,';>aC:>v.- s�",>'•, �� 1 ", .ry ,.n k` -.aii^, x-.-i Y ...rb•:':avi'� tf;i`�i� i,.'.J.S...,,.i e1S;n.w.'ti d. ��II NEW PIER SUPPORT F.XLSTds*8-FT vADE FD-D E)GSTING R;AAS TO W f?ETAt 4W and MAINTAINED PILE rOPELEVATt N W00D Paz DECK Fq otpr 4-FT, BovE DECK j'TYPJ TO BE REMOVE COS 71MBER5,RH 5C�S DP ) arxi TONE FROM SrMAND LEAVE REt'IAtN?NG► MAWTA"ET7(fYFyj SrABLESTONEINPLACE(77P} i 1'7- S•!T•.'ifi�•^i. +e',•'6wiiN'`6^'ef�i}:n v�s'w�. �{`L1 I..�.L�11 SEDIMENTS:SAND l+, ms=s :;?:.�a;,Y,.., _ /.,��}�j�y��/+>���♦ ♦/.�• r.'ti•w!--;i'' i' Kr'-'*w. E>Q �w� 8 +�, i •.°��.'i ViY.Ti-41/r�L/Y.G I•S fiJ .�•�, . J�1`�'�%•rt'A:�e'«.�t:_ .•'"{Sffl.�•b�£�',.,Y.•�f,.-v ��••!i�.,�. 1 WOOD PIER TO BE izE rA?�W pClS tiNG PALS 7TE-DFP Ptl_E mid I-INWAINED(i1 Frj TO BE NEW RER SUPPORT I REPL LW Pl E'X P EL Ate- MAINTAIN FENDSIZNO (' TOP EL'T7tFF ASE DECK{fYP) AT END OF PIER t ._..HTL 3. —MHW25t — ji- - ._ — __ _ _ .-- - — — t ( f — MLW O.O- PLJT CLAMP eROSS ( EEL C GRAS ,�}?;� ` ` , <, ` „� I ;y, 1, '� I 't' ', _ ,;:, �',,• ',,,, "i,^ ,r :{ Y t,�•`•---f.. a:y--..--5>*i �<C.M iYr�;ems � � a.6ar;;>f=rr,(�:Y•s^;.`Zx��..lac`^yb..:�.r•.;,'rt c-k,.?t;+;•�"q^�'�-�"'•—^r- '`f'? r. l::n.�.'1�.•^.l1.��,;°4�s`:,,:�1`a.;`�'.::+f...S• ,'•�-a.',.�.�d'�:�T'.� f�St. "". "t�:��' APPrVINt t7PY"XJG, r i:� `�s.'• °n r':i y 4.: �I -V L...•" V�t� r� ...r'_ I. -....~.'cr`;°'-. •E�.. lo+ _ .,15. `}; s`, •.t;t,: v''t TIONS A1�)?ASED ON ATER cwc �o PRoEcr LOCK RECONSTRUCTION ReVSW 12-12-18 T.O.S. LOCATa,4.- FS4325 I -TOOM of SOUnJOLD PROJECT NAME ..t-UFFOLK,C XWTY,"NEW Y'OW � pc�x y WATEf2WAY FISHEIZS ISLAND SOUND co REVEA D 04-M-•19 T.OS. DA,TE� JANUA9Y 8,24Z D 0 C K 0 1 CR BS R�� �M� fPPL1GAW LGMG FIM:LLC r oc<o, INC. ? B.Nelms,PE a P Ucroawe '��fi sstoN�` MAY - 3 2019 FAX WO 572 DWG n -W76 k:rth B,Nc titn,f^.xkc^s 5f:J2,.g:'G4�i v=_"�.>:•,g pe'm-rL�=�,.•.� Southold Town BC;,,f(!Oi_f_jstpes Michael J.Domino,President 0fS01/T�O Town Hall Annex John M.Bredemeyer III,Vice-President O 1 54375 Route 25 O P.O.Box 1179 Glenn Goldsmith l Southold,New York 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski G Q Telephone(631) 765-1892 Greg Williams YO Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES May 15, 2019 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Keith Neilson, P.E. Docko, Inc. P.O. Box 421 Mystic, CT 06355 RE: LCMG FINY, LLC c/o LESLIE GOSS 3773 CLAY POINT ROAD, FISHERS ISLAND SCTM# 1000-2-1-14.1 Dear Mr. Neilson: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, May 15, 2019 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Docko, Inc., on behalf of LCMG FINY, LLC c/o LESLIE GOSS applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated December 26, 2018, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator recommended that the proposed application be found Inconsistent with the LWRP, and, WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has furthered Policies of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program to the greatest extent possible through the imposition of the following Best Management Practice requirements: the submission of revised plans for a dock similar in length and construction to others proven suitable for this coastal zone. Additionally shortening the dock was not an option as it could impinge upon eelgrass regrowth; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application March 20, 2019 and May 15, 2019, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, y - 2 WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and,-- - WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that for the mitigating factors and based upon the Best Management Practice requirement imposed above, the Board of Trustees deems the action to be Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program pursuant to Chapter 268-5 of the Southold Town Code, and, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees APPROVE the application of LCMG FINY, LLC c/o LESLIE GOSS to retain and reconstruct ±151 linear feet of existing 8' wide fixed wood pier with handrails on each side, of which ±120 linear feet is seaward of the AHWL; replace handrails on each side of pier and install new decking; all of the crib's will be removed, including timbers and half of the stone from site with removed stone to be disposed of offsite; the remaining stable stone at each crib location will be left in a stable mound to preserve habitat with new 12 inch Class B piles to be utilized for support of the pier for its full length; install Thru-Flow decking for the full level length of the structure over the water; construct a transitional slope section of the pier from the mainland bluff to meet standard 1:10 maximum gradient in order to provide 5 feet of clearance for pedestrian access along beach; install ladders at strategic locations along the length of the pier, and bumpers/fenders at the end of the pier; and to replace three (3) tie-off piles and install one (1) new tie-off pile; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Docko, Inc., received on May 3, 2019, and stamped approved on May 15, 2019. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is approved. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of$50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: $50.00 Very truly yours, o �dh Michael J. Domino President, Board of Trustees MJD/dd Michael J.Domino,President oOF S0(�TyOI Town Hall Annex John M.Bredemeyer I11,Vice-President 54375 Route 25 O P.O.Box 1179 Glenn Goldsmith Southold,New York 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski G Telephone(631) 765-1892 Greg Williams �O Fax(631) 765-6641 olyCOU ,� BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 15, 2019 Keith Neilson, P.E. Docko, Inc. P.O. Box 421 Mystic, CT 06355 RE: LCMG FINY, LLC c/o LESLIE GOSS 3773 CLAY POINT ROAD, FISHERS ISLAND SCTM# 1000-2-1-14.1 Dear Mr. Neilson: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, May 15, 2019 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Docko, Inc. on behalf of LCMG FINY, LLC c/o LESLIE GOSS applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 111 of the Southold Town Code, Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas, application dated December 26, 2018, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator recommended that the proposed applications be found Inconsistent with the LWRP, and specifically Inconsistent with_the following coastal policies: Policy 4.1 - Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards, Policy 6.3—Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands, and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on March 20, 2019, and May 15, 2019, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the"premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the proposed structure, as applied for, is located in a nearshore area as per --- -------Definitions in-Chapter-1-1-1--Coastal-Erosion..Hazar-d Areas of the Town Code and governed by Section 111-11 C. All development is prohibited in nearshore areas unless specifically provided for by this chapter; and as per Chapter 111-6 Definitions - Unregulated Activity— docks, piers, wharves or structures built on floats, columns, open timber piles or other similar open work supports with a top surface area less than 200 square feet or which are removed in the fall of each year, and, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that for foregoing reasons, and because the proposed action is located entirely within the coastal erosion hazard area and in a nearshore area, and because the proposed action is not permitted in such areas pursuant to Chapter 111 of the Town Code, that the Trustees deem the proposed project to be impermissible under Chapter 111, and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that for the foregoing reasons, the Board of Trustees DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Coastal Erosion Permit application of LCMG FINY, LLC c/o LESLIE GOSS to retain and reconstruct±151 linear feet of existing 8' wide fixed wood pier with handrails on each side, of which ±120 linear feet is seaward of the AHWL; replace handrails on each side of pier and install new decking; all of the cribs will be removed, including timbers and half of the stone from site with removed stone to be disposed of offsite; the remaining stable stone at each crib location will be left in a stable mound to preserve habitat with new 12 inch Class B piles to be utilized for support of the pier for its full length; install Thru-Flow decking for the full level length of the structure over the water; construct a transitional slope section of the pier from the mainland bluff to meet standard 1:10 maximum gradient in order to provide 5 feet of clearance for pedestrian access along beach; install ladders at strategic locations along the length of the pier, and bumpers/fenders at the end of the pier; and to replace three (3) tie-off piles and install one (1) new tie-off pile; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Docko, Inc., received on May 3, 2019. This determination should not be considered a determination made for any other Department or Agency, which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. Very truly yours, Michael J. Domino, President Board of Trustees MJD/dd �osulFock�\° Michael J. Domino,Presidents° �Gy� Town Hall Annex John M. Bredemeyer, III, Vice-President Z4 " 54375 Route 25 Glenn Goldsmith o ,z P.O. Box 1179 A Nicholas Krupskiy�j Southold, NY 11971 Greg Williams -�rY Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 9-- TO: -TO: DOCKO, INC., c/o LCMG FINY, LLC 1 Please be advised that your application dated December 26, 2018 has been reviewed by this Board at the regular meeting of May 15, 2019 and your application has been approved pending the completion of the following items checked off below. Revised Plans for proposed project Pre-Construction Hay Bale Line Inspection Fee ($50.00) — (Silt boom) 1St Day of Construction ($50.00) 'h Constructed ($50.00) xx Final Inspection Fee ($50.00) Dock Fees ($3.00 per sq. ft.) 30-Year Maintenance Agreement (complete original form enclosed and submit to Board of Trustees Office) The Permittee is required to provide evidence that the non-turf buffer condition of the Trustee permit has been recorded with the Suffolk County Clerk's Office as a notice covenant and deed restriction to the deed of the subject parcel. Such evidence shall be provided within ninety (90) calendar days of issuance of this permit. Permit fees are now due Please make check or money order payable to Town of Southold. The fee is computed below according to the schedule of rates as set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The following fee must be paid within 90 days or re-application fees will be necessary. You will receive your permit upon completion of the above. COMPUTATION OF PERMIT FEES: TOTAL FEES DUE: $ 50.00 y' BY: Michael J. Domino, President Board of Trustees S\1FFQI,I-: ry Michael J. Don President O 'r Town Hall Annex John M. Bredemeyer rml Vice-President `sem, 54375 Route 25 Glenn Goldsmith y z P.O.Box 1179 A.Nicholas Krupski %�5Southold,NY 11971 Greg Williams 'y pr Telephone(631)765-1892 ��� Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES q TOWN OF SOUTHOLD I Date/Time: S- I Completed in field by: � Docko, Inc. on behalf of LCMG FINY, LLC, c/o LESLIE GOSS requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to retain and reconstruct ±151 linear feet of existing 8' wide fixed wood pier with handrails on each side, of which ±120 linear feet is waterward of the AHWL; install 32 new pier support piles; maintain the landward most stone-filled timber pier support crib; remove the outermost four (4) support crib timbers; replace three (3) tie-off piles and install one (1) new tie-off pile. Located: 3773 Clay Point Road, Fishers Island. SCTM# 1000-2-1-14.1 CH. 275-3 - SETBACKS WETLAND BOUNDARY: Actual Footage or OK=4 Setback Waiver Required 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 50 feet 3. Sanitary Leaching Pool (cesspool): 100 feet 4. Septic Tank: 75 feet 5. Swimming Pool and related structures: 50 feet 6. Landscaping or gardening: 50 feet 7. Placement of C&D material: 100 feet TOP OF BLUFF: 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 100 feet 3. Sanitary leaching pool (cesspool) 100 feet: 4. Swimming pool and related structures: 100 feet Public Notice of Hearing Card Posted: Y / N Ch. 275 / Ch. 111 / SEQRA Type: I II Unlisted Action Type of Application: Pre-Submission Administrative Amendment Wetland Coastal Erosion Emergency Violation Non-Jurisdiction Survey <_ 5 years: Y/N Wetland Line by: C.E.H.A. Line Additional information/suggested modifications/conditions/need for outside review/consultant/application completeness/comments/standards: I have read & acknowledged the foregoing Trustees comments: Agent/Owner: l Present were: J. Bredemeyer �M. Domino G. Goldsmith f N. Krupski Z- G. Williams Other S�FFot, Michael J. Dor� esl ', O�Q. �r Town Hall Annex John M. Bredemeyer III,Vice-k&ie dent �� y�'� 54375 Route 25 Glenn Goldsmith $ P.O.Box 1179 A.Nicholas Krupski Southold,NY 11971 Greg Williams 4-, p! Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date/Time: vI Completed in field by: 1n Q Docko, Inc. on behalf of LCMG FINY, LLC, c/o LESLIE GOSS requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to retain and reconstruct ±151 linear feet of existing 8' wide fixed wood pier with handrails on each side, of which ±120 linear feet is waterward of the AHWL; install 32 new pier support piles; maintain the landward most stone-filled timber pier support crib; remove the outermost four (4) support crib timbers; replace three (3) tie-off piles and install one (1) new tie-off pile. Located: 3773 Clay Point Road, Fishers Island. SCTM# 1000-2-1-14.1 CH. 275-3 - SETBACKS WETLAND BOUNDARY: Actual Footage or OK=4 Setback Waiver Required 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 50 feet 3. Sanitary Leaching Pool (cesspool): 100 feet 4. Septic Tank: 75 feet 5. Swimming Pool and related structures: 50 feet 6. Landscaping or gardening: 50 feet 7. Placement of C&D material: 100 feet TOP OF BLUFF: 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 100 feet 3. Sanitary leaching pool (cesspool) 100 feet: 4. Swimming pool and related structures: 100 feet Public Notice of Hearing Card Posted: Y / N Ch. 275 Ch. 111 SEQRA Type: I II Unlisted Action Type of Application: Pre-Submission Administrative Amendment Wetland \ Coastal Erosion Emergency Violation Non-Jurisdiction Survey <_ 5 years: Y/N Wetland Line by: C.E.H.A. Line Additional information/suggested modifications/conditions/need for outside review/consultant/application completeness/comments/standards: I have read & acknowledged the foregoing Trustees comments: -� Agent/Owner: Present were: J. Bredemeyer im. Dominoy G. Goldsmith �-�N. Krupski G. Williams Other scan.c:xc:,-cwer.¢nu» s +unr.:.v�ro.w-+a-:•roax.«<,.:;..a.n-N:aw.-s>,a: x+rc_•.xwu.rrawwe.v-�xwm��.w+cuww<+,wr t� - �n :n.>ati,.ne;» •.mw�»+sr.-�.. �,.ams,:,=r.V,>,.w„.�w,r, m++��w.G•«A..-mw. +ser..ewsm�e.enw.,v>,.-, :,.:..,w>.r>..,n.w+�+..i�>,.�....�a, �s-rx-+.>uwmm+nm:.-rsea-mms.�muwas�xM....S�*>rY .amu mmmmm+.�wna xnww>xewwn:...a>,.saenr�v�n»rrowenw+Fs+-+ve+*�aa.0 —»mwvc - . --- /9 .,... 1 f i J,r �a i f / � r fir• � i 1 (t t t` t oa � � .- ' 99 %4`c.. 1 y. 1, *• �1 r i j 8 9 a (3, 9 o” 'TA) �i`4,'�o 6. !®5 �, � � ✓ .lei!A"��`� iJ�lw�S p/"`'"'.E'!t`� x�T�'°�s�""tft�/Y' "� ''r' �' � � . r � ' - 6 PL .194 JV' 7- ;or { j pp r n ' o a z U R V L:y JANeVLA .. �._,.__..�_.,..�..�...^.... .,... ��,�° ll ,.�"�� 4� �+ {pry p� pew �q s�1 �,.t ,P� +� �p-�^ �4 � .� 6 a a A CB � b.+ H O Ss O.4�"P O Y£FV 1 •j f s.�ca.mw.r•.w,�«sewvnum=:.....�-rr�;^>„ ...:;t�.r,om:«mn>+,�.�: "s 4 _..,'... . , _ � .... .-.,• .,...;.�..m.wM...,>.. ... e� � .-. � � � v,:� .. ,urFewae�w.em.-..,u .rsums„=.>w�+s.4+rt'�- , -. .�,••awe,�..,�.....,,,Q�...,,.�.:w..«..,,....�,.o:.�o�.�.w......,...N,..w•m..��:v�+..ra. w�vsw+.�wmves.n,�.;v�.-.x.�w.,m.,r..,-�,-.,,�..:.:..., ...cM_,.Y,.»,.,n..,.:....,.. ;��m« ,-».e......�,.m...•.,.„....�, „_,...,�„ ..,�qaw,„�„ .., � ,,.,sn,.,».:.m.-.. .::,.>..mM.�,.M.�:..,�.w�.>�,w..�>.,+�-.+n..�nw,.m.�x«, I ...., LCMG FINY,LLC c/o Leslie Goss 3773 Clay Point Road,Fishers Island SCTM#: 1000-2-1-14.1 2/28/19 Mr Aug z� a ♦y ��I - - ���=yam `+�� • , • / • LCMG ANY,LLC c/o Leslie Goss 3773 Clay Point Road,Fishers Island 5CTM#: 1000-2-1-14.1 2/28/19 qw I, low go . - _�._ -.. .,. •.mss-�-._ter.... 4+w -ra - Y LCMG FI NY,LLC c/o Leslie Goss 3773 Clay Point Road,Fishers Island - r � CTM#: 1000-2-1-14.1 2/28/19 ,. IF 44. 490 + � � Yom-; �` ,5�� � .T �' }x-:x• • r I SII, IL 04%. Y ` Ak t. r�. 7 � y r Pile' S ' 1 LESLIE GOSS PROPERTY Pier Maintenance T. .v- r! r�"f4G PROPERTY OF LCMG FINY LLC LESLIE GOSS EAST END ROAD, FISHERS ISLAND �1T=> � M• . CRCOG/State of CT USDA FSA,Mkrosofl Esri,HERE,PC Esn.HERE.Garmin,iPC PROPERTY OF LCMG FINY LLC LESLIE GOSS EAST END ROAD, FISHERS ISLAND ` N 71� it V jr 35611 earth : ti • • • TAX ASSESSOR'S 1000-2.1-14.1 PROJECT: "DOCK MAINTENANCE" WATERWAY: FISHERS ISLAND SOUND LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK APPLICANT: LCMG FINY,LLC I AGENT: DOCKO,INC. FISHERS ISLAND SOUND ERR O / 2 � 6 ? rL� 2 �, 11.3 - '*•'/ 3.DA 3.2A 3.1A(c) �r RI'1 O1 5.2 3.9A 11A J 7.3 ne 3 2A(c) 0. \I 9.1A 9 2.8A 3.6AIc1 d 12 2.1A - = O 7.4 3 34A 8.614 M1 ^ P,1 8 B 2 g 7.21.7A 4.24 171j 14.1 16 1 �7°T9p'f 1.14 4.BA 16.3 1 BA 18 2.2AIcI Uul 'G R� ]5.2 ' 1.5A mf 94 ° ——SCH R7,Di,,,LM1 ——X—— UNLESS DRAWN OTHERWISE, ALL PROPERTIES NOTICE ue COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © E 110 ARE WITHIN THE FOLLOWING' DISTRICTS. ��' pJ� E —F—— R.,..of f,,LIIW ——R—— SD.oDL < SEWER— nD MAINTENANCE,ALTERATION,SALE OR Wa6 _ ® Real Property Tax Service Agency Y —■—— m—"dow"I"Utr —HST—— FIRE 27 __ HrDRAHT—' DISTRIBUTION OF ANY PORTION OF THE P• 002 ° LIOxi WATER SUFFOLK COUNTY T4%MAP IS PROH181TED County Center Riverhead,N Y 119U1 M _L—— emdlm[e W,,,LM——A—— PARR REFUSE_ 81 :(y SCALE PI FEET. A —.—P—— °sfemfer Waf°kf Line —WW—— Au9ULAHCE WASTEWATEl WITHOUT WRITTEN PERIASSION OF THE �� ®$ 2N o 700 100 P a0 FERRY_ Bo REAL PROPERTY TAX SERVICE AGENCY. --5-— I ' 46 o\�} _NE I LkC DON-B cK,sw_?v&fEAW�. LOCATION MAP a PROJECT: "DOCK MAINTENANCE" 45 `� WATERWAY: FISHERS ISLAND SOUND - ------ -- --------------- , LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD G�ZC. %�I� SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK 53 ,..����.qpR�• APPLICANT: LCMG FINY,LLC tiJ � w AGENT: DOCKO,INC. 60 67 C 53 1 54`! �� V�3E._� c`ump 35 t \ 42 clu IMP ' .Rock Islands Br� � —q2 �J'��/ 27 PQoln�F o � � ji^ ''�. P\n"' .s � -'Eas �'116r, —30 ' /Point -�,�. �� � —�� o`' �/,�� r-'. -�-'�=_ �t±�� `�� ( / _- ✓ I V r� ,i r�oV • l �" ��/�- ��1��1 i. _tiii � � �,� c� 1 c,/� �in' \ !1 /'x %6—. ' N., r_~; �<� ,1` J � i �! .��' :- i��`!,•i\�'q� — 1 'r `, a °•�T�-''�1��,�7 " "�;r������ �j �1 �111`��.o���ie,� �l I ' , (i ' 1.;v` '� - I wl, �' 9-U�'�-'` �.•'! 11�> j MVV• o,vi• � - -- ' I �•,, '.^ ;' rte'V I II � k\\\ I�1�, /�; "\IAV ��� � � i • 1' 't✓. _:P�- v-� _J'�l �,��(��� J pT1, g 11,1`_ 50=;.L ✓ ° i1 '� �' l' ' :O•( '� i�� \\ T7�QS2G2E 1;�y eyPc�st 48 * 1 / �V�a 46 / Jlsland nd B81 RAI AS ,� 27 79 � 25 57 _/ i� Vi 96 60 So' I I '120f T37 i � � r I Y Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:office@docko.com September 13,2018 US Army Corps of Engineers New York District ATTN: Regulatory Branch, Room 1937 26 Federal Plaza New York,NY 10278-0090 Re: LCMG FINY, LLC Property, Fishers Island Dock Maintenance To Whom It May Concern: On behalf of LCMG FINY, LLC , we request a Department of the Army Permit for dock maintenance in Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island, New. York. We enclose herewith the following in support of this permit application: ❖ Two prints each of plans titled: Project: "Dock Maintenance" Location: Fishers Island,Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York Waterway: Fishers Island Sound Applicant: LCMG FINY, LLC Agent: Docko, Inc. ❖ Two copies of NYS DEC and Corps of Engineers Joint Application Forms, US ACOE Application Form, NYS DOS Federal Consistency Assessment Form, EFH Assessment Worksheet, Environmental Questionnaire, Narrative and Location Map,Tax Assessor's Map, and photographs. ❖ One copy of the NYS DEC Application Documents ❖ One copy of the NYS DOS Application Documents I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable; please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, DO O, INC. Keith B. Neilson, P.E. KBN: cb Enclosure CC: Ms. Leslie Goss NYS DEC: Environmental Permits NYS DOS File: 17-09-2876 GOSS r U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Form Approved- APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB No.0710-0003 33 CFR 325.The proponent agency is CECW-CO-R. Expires:30-SEPTEMBER-2015 Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 11 hours per response,including the time for reviewing instructions,searching existing data sources,gathering and maintaining the data needed,and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of information,including suggestions for reducing this burden,to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters,Executive Services and Communications Directorate,Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and Budget,Paperwork Reduction Project(0710-0003). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if It does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the Distnct Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT Authorities:Rivers and Harbors Act,Section 10,33 USC 403;Clean Water Act,Section 404,33 USC 1344;Marine Protection,Research,and Sanctuaries Act,Section 103,33 USC 1413;Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers;Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332. Principal Purpose:Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses:This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal,state,and local govemment agencies,and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law. Submission of requested information is voluntary,however,if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application(see sample drawings and/or instructions)and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned. (ITEMS 1 THRU 4 T BE FILLED BY THE CORPS) 1 APPLICATION NO. 2 FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE (ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BYAPPLICANT) 5. APPLICANTS NAME S. AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME AND TITLE(agent is not required) First- Leslie Middle- 0 Last- Goss First- Keith Middle-B Last- Neilson,P.E. Company- LCMG FINY,LLC Company- Docko,Inc. E-mail Address- E-mail Address- office@docko.com 6 APPLICANTS ADDRESS: 9. AGENTS ADDRESS: Address- 11888 SW Breyman Avenue Address- P,0 Box 421 City- Portland State- OR ZIP- 97219 Country- City- Mystic State- CT ZIP- 06355 Country- 7. APPLICANTS PHONE NOs.w/AREA CODE 10. AGENTS PHONE NOs.WAREA CODE a. Residence b. Business c. Fax a. Residence b. Business c. Fax 503-819-7818 860-572-8939 860-572-7569 STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION 11 1 hereby authorize, Docko,Inc. to act in my behalf as my a in the processing of this application and to fumish,upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit ap ation.1 A P't r I I. 4 SMNATURE OF APPLICANY DATE NAME,LOCATION,AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY 12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE(see instructions) Dock Mata-f5c ia.ade 13. NAME OF WATERBODY,IF KNOWN(if applicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS(if applicable) Fishers Island Sound Address 3773 Clay Point Road 15. LOCATION OF PROJECT Latitude--N 41 16'38" Longitude:-W 71 59'36" City- Fishers Island State- NY Zip- 06390 16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS,IF KNOWN(see instructions) State Tax Parcel ID 1000-2.-I-14.1 Municipality Section- Township- Range- ENG FORM 4345, DEC 2014 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 1 of 3 It 17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE Make your way to the New London Fishers Island Ferry Termianal.Take the ferry to Fishers Island.Leaving the terminal turn left onto Equestrain Avenue and then turn right on to Oriental Avenue. Turn left onto Clay Point Road. The house will be on your left. 18. Nature of Activity(Description,of project,include all features) The proposed project is to maintain 151(+/-)LF of existing 8-FT wide fixed wood pier,of whichl20(+/-)LF is waterward of the AHWL,including the installation of 32 support piles,maintain the landward most stone filled timber pier support crib,and remove the outermost 4 support crib timbers. Replace 3 tie-off piles and install 1 new tie-off pile,all at and waterward of the Apparent High Tide line in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. 19. Project Purpose(Describe the reason or purpose of the project,see instructions) This project is to maintain a pre 1968 pier for recreational boating. USE BLOCKS 20-23 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED 20. Reason(s)for Discharge There is no dredging associated with this project and there will be no discharge of materials. 21. Type(s)of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards: Type Type Type Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards No discharge of materials with this project. 22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled(see instructions) Acres There is no fill associated with this project. or Linear Feet 23. Description of Avoidance,Minimization,and Compensation(see instructions) ENG FORM 4345,DEC 2014 Page 2 of 3 24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete?❑Yes &�No IF YES,DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK 25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners,Lessees,Etc.,Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody(t more than can be entered here,Please attach a supplemental list) a.Address- 10 WeybossettSt.Ste 1000 City- Providence State- RI ZIP- 02903 b.Address- P.O.Box 91 City- Montchann State- DE ZIP- 19710 c.Address- City- State- ZIP- d.Address- City- State- Zip- e.Address- City- State- Zip- 26. List of Other Certificates or Approvals/Dentals received from other Federal,State,or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application. AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL` IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED NUMBER NYSDEC pending Town of Southold pending NYSDOS pending Would include but is not restricted to zoning,building,and flood plain permits 27. Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that this information in this application is complete and accurate. 1 further c 'fy th ssess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the applicant. Q ( � I� I RE AP ANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE The App1i tion must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity(applicant)or it may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed. 18 U.S.C.Section 1001 provides that:Whoever,in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies,conceals,or covers up any trick,scheme,or disguises a material fact or makes any false,fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both. ENG FORM 4345,DEC 2014 Page 3 of 3 tw 4EW ._�.�ue�r� ontof Woof D , _Pari lnt r+Qys q- yT WINnrrawrroll�rraiett tnerervlaf� ate +Cof ruat on uS.ar ca o�Enrteers� JOINT APPLICATION FORM For Permits for activities activities affecting streams,waterways,waterbodies,wetlands, coastal areas, sources of water, and endangered and threatened species. You must separately apply for and obtain Permits from each involved agency before starting work. Please read all instructions. 1. Applications To: >NYS Department of Environmental Conservation ® Check here to confirm you sent this form to NYSDEC. - Check all permits that apply: F—]Dams and impound- X❑Tidal Wetlands ❑ Water Withdrawal ❑Stream Disturbance ment Structures ❑Wild, Scenic and ❑ Long Island Well ❑ Excavation and Fill in ❑401 Water Quality Recreational Rivers ❑ Incidental Take of Navigable Waters Certification ❑ Coastal Erosion Endangered/ 0 Docks, Moorings or ❑Freshwater Wetlands Management Threatened Species Platforms >US Army Corps of Engineers 0 Check here to confirm you sent this form to USACE. Check all permits that apply: ❑Section 404 Clean Water Act ❑X Section 10 Rivers and Harbors Act Is the project Federally funded? ❑ Yes F0 No If yes, name of Federal Agency: General Permit Type(s), if known: Preconstruction Notification: ❑ Yes El No >NYS Office of General Services ❑ Check hereto confirm,you sent this form to NYSOGS.- Check all permits that apply: ❑ State Owned Lands Under Water ❑ Utility Easement(pipelines, conduits, cables, etc.) ❑ Docks, Moorings or Platforms >NYS Department of State ❑ Check here to confirm-you sent this form to NYSDOS. Check if this applies: 5�Coastal Consistency Concurrence 2. Name of Applicant Taxpayer ID if applicant is NOT an individual LCMG FINY,LLC Mailing Address Post Office/City State Zi 11888 SW Breyman Avenue Portland I LOR] 197219 Telephone 503-819-7818 Email Applicant Must be (check all that apply): Y Owner ❑ Operator ❑ Lessee 3. Name of Property Owner if different than Applicant Mailing Address Post Office/City State Zi Telephone Email For A enc ap Use.Onl'' A enc Application. Number.. � - `- j. 'M E -� JOINT APPLICATION FORM 08/16 Page 1 of 4 YP JOIE, 'PLICATION FORM—Continued. Submit th;, mpleted page as part of your Application. d. Name of Contact/Agent Docko, Inc. Keith B.Neilson, P.E. Mailing Address Post Office/City State Zi P.O.Box 421 Mystic LC T] 06355 Telephone (860)572-8939 Email Fofrice@docko.com 5. Project/Facility Name Property Tax Map Section/Block/Lot Number: dock maintenance 1 11000-2.-l-14-1 Project Street Address, if applicable Post Office I City State Zi 3773 Clay Point Road NY Fishers Island 06390 Provide directions and distances to roads, intersections, bridges and bodies of water Take the Fishers Island Ferry and leaving the terminal turn left onto Equestrian Ave.and then tum right onto Oriental Avenue. Tum left onto Clay Point Road. The house will be on your left. Town ❑ Village ❑ City County StreamlWaterbody Name Southhold I I Suffolk West Harbor Project Location Coordinates: Enter Latitude and Lon itude in degrees, minutes, seconds: Latitude: 41 16 38 Longitude: 71 59 36 6. Project Description: Provide the following information about your project. Continue each response and provide any additional information on other pages. Attach plans on separate pages. a. Purpose of the proposedproject: This project is to maintain longstanding wood crib supported pier with tie-off piles in support of recreational boating. b. Description of current site conditions: The site is a low coastal bluff along the east shore of West Harbor with a rocky,gravel beach lined with stone which is overgrown with bittersweet,various herbacious and small woody stem deciduous and coniferous trees with an access path from the pier to the house. c. Proposed site changes: There are no plannned changes to the site.The pier location and configuration will not change except for the maintenance wor and the change to pile supports. d. Type of structures and fill materials to be installed, and quantity of materials to be used(e.g.,square feet of coverage, cubic yards of fill material, structures below ordinary/mean high water, etc.): There is no fill to be placed in this project.The stone fill from the crib will be left on the seabed in accordance with pre- application coordination with the Director of the Marine Habitat Protection Bureau. e. Area of excavation or dredging, volume of material to be removed, location of dredged materialplacement: There is no excavation or dredging proposed at this site only the removal of deteriorated wood crib framing. f. Is tree cutting or clearing proposed? ❑ Yes If Yes, ex Iain below. IX No Timing of the proposed cutting or clearing (month/year): Number of trees to be cut: Acreage of trees to be cleared: JOINT APPLICATION FORM 08116 Page 2 of 4 y Jo1N PLIcarloN FORM—Continued. Submit th'ia �npleted page as part of your Application. g. Work methods and type of equipment to be used: TFie contractor will ave to use a marine construction barge with a deck mounted craneTo con uc maintenance work. Piles will be driven between the cribs at suitable intervals to support deck stringers,then the crib timbers will be removed.The barge mounted deck crane will also lift replacement timbers into position for connection with power tools. h. Describe the planned sequence of activities: Mobilization will be followed by pile driving along side the existing pier. Pile pairs will be connected by split caps then deck stringers will be installed.Crib timbers will be removed progressively as pile pairs are completed to support the pier. I. Pollution control methods and other actions proposed to mitigate environmental impacts: There is no planned excavation or removal of sediments or stone from the sea bed and cribs will no longer be used to support the pier. The water depths are adequate to accomodate the marine construction barge and pushboats without bottom contact. j. Erosion and silt control methods that will be used to prevent water quality impacts: ere are no Toreseeable wa er quaff i impac s WE is project only pie driving,Ine timber Traming and decking and removal o old derteriorated timber crib framing. k. Altematives considered to avoid regulated areas. If no feasible alternatives exist, explain how the project will minimize impacts: ere are no real alternatives o occasional replacement ot components on wood pie and timber piers. in early pre-application reviews of the project it was was agreed that removal of the crib timbers and replacement with piles would be preferable. I. Proposed use: M Private ❑Public ❑Commercial m.Proposed Start Date:I Permit reciept Estimated Completion Date: 12 months n. Has work begun onproject? Yes If Yes, explain below. Vy No o. Will project occupy Federal, State, or Municipal Land? :Yes If Yes, explain below. No p. List any previous DEC, USACE, OGS or DOS Permit/Application numbers for activities at this location: Permit searches were requested from the USACOE,Town and State;none were found. Maintenance permits for this pre-1968 structure have been applied for at the Town and the ALOE. q. Will this project require additional Federal, State,or Local authorizations,including zoning changes? Yes If Yes, list below. Z: No NYS DEC, NYSDOS and the Town of Southold Board of Trustees Maintenance permits. JOINT APPLICATION FORM 08116 Page 3 of 4 JOINT APPLICATION FORM—Continued. Submit this completed page as part of your Application. 7. Signatures. Applicant and Owner(If different) must sign the application. Append additional pages of this Signature section if there are multiple Applicants, Owners or Contact/Agents. I hereby affirm that information provided on this form and all attachments submitted herewith is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. Permission to Inspect - I hereby consent to Agency inspection of the project site and adjacent property areas. Agency staff may enter the property without notice between 7:00 am and 7:00 pm, Monday- Friday. Inspection may occur without the owner, applicant or agent present. If the property is posted with"keep out"signs or fenced with an unlocked gate, Agency staff may still enter the property. Agency staff may take measurements, analyze site physical characteristics,take soil and vegetation samples, sketch and photograph the site. I understand that failure to give this consent may result in denial of the permit(s)sought by this application. False statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the NYS Penal Law. Further, the applicant accepts full responsibility for all damage, direct or indirect,of whatever nature, and by whomever suffered,arising out of the project described herein and agrees to indemnify and save harmless the State from suits, actions, damages and costs of every name and description resulting from said project. In addition, Federal Law, 18 U.S.C., Section 1001 provides for a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both where an applicant knowingly and willingly falsifies, conceals, or covers up a material fact; or knowingly makes or uses a false, fictitious or fraudulent statement. Signat4r4,pf Applicant Date A.P6 licant Must be(check dil that apply): ® Owner ❑Operator ❑ Lessee Printed Name Title Leslie O. Goss for LCMG FINY,LLC Co-Owner Signature of Owner if different than Applicant) Date I L Printed Name Title Si natur f Contact/ ent Date Printed Name Title p Keith B. Neilson, P.E. Agent For Aggency Use Only DETERMINATION OF NO PERMIT REQUIRED Agency Application Number- (Agency Name)has determined that No Permit is required from this Agency for the project described in this application.",' ; Agency Representative: Printed _ Title Name - Signature Date JOINT APPLICATION FORM 08/16 Page 4 Of 4 J EFH ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR FEDERAL AGENCIES (modified 08/04) PROJECT NAME: DOCK Maintenance DATE: August 2018 PROJECT NO.: LOCATION: LCMG FINY, LLC Property, Fishers Island, NY PREPARER: DOCKO, INC., Keith B. Neilson, P.E Step 1. Use the Habitat Conservation Division EFH webpage,Guide to Essential Fish Habitat Designations in the Northeastern United States to generate the list of designated EFH for federally-managed species for the geographic area of interest(http://www.nero.noaa.gov/hcd/index2a.htm). Use the species list as part of the initial screening process to determine if EFH for those species occurs in the vicinity of the proposed action. Attach that list to the worksheet because it will be used in later steps. Make a preliminary determination on the need to conduct an EFH Consultation, ,,�.s=_'- v'ry -5i'v'-X.� '6t_ -,r�z::1,4b__ ,•�` _l - '^1��'.a ,35`4'" :+f_s _ �_ -__"aC=- R'�_-r- __ -r Ni'..",!a!zcir 1..-z�y,a-•�1?;:C=t:m5:,`;'-:' ' __ - �€",_--X7_•-4=' - =4�^ _V:.�,, INITIAL�.CONSIDEI�i4TION "C_'_ - EFH Designations = - Yes No Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for eggs? x Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for larvae? x Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for juveniles? x Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for adults? x Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for spawning adults? x If you answered no to all questions above,then EFH consultation is not required -go to Section 5. If you answered yes to any of the above questions proceed to Section 2 and complete remainder of the worksheet. Y a Step 2.In order to assess impacts,it is critical to know the habitat characteristics of the site before the activity is undertaken. Use existing information,to the extent possible,in answering these questions. Please note that, there may be circumstances in which new information must be collected to appropriately characterize the site and assess impacts. - ^_ '.' -'::S�a:;'•��;wt`.-�:s=--'i.`v-» •'or,�'i:'�..vS�- .`-" =��'-' i';tiad r:- ��✓=ys': �'sv+L. rr-fi; _ �`'NTM!. ,*nr.v"��•.tt-i�.ti, �,m+aa __t r. -z •f,__ _ _ _ ;'2=_dc s- =�=-t��a ,RL air'_•z-+� __ _ "_-0, =�� e: •r=te 'r-�_ rr,"- .....�__*•_ z= �'-'Y�-•',�� -~_ - ;"'`''i=� �"=_ _ -__- >';Y.�='�Sii 1�s����.:.�::-=.:=Y.,_s`E,__ _ ___�<cn-�._-•-neat�=�a.� .=7��=�',�..�i-� =r-5�;�;=�1'� ;MKI �CHA"p- RI MC ,u R al:-"4z='4;;- - n�,.._.�_.,^._�:a'.:_ -- '�;.�..�-r?.'' -i�::1 r _;w�.,m�']Y�a__,.'_rte;s•,:aY,4=1Y;=``}i4;,,�wCcm_,��."-n•.+.,t�.�-=_��-�•��'3`P:��.,"5?e;.,_u-:�afi=",tea: Site Characteristics: Description--- Is escription;Is the site intertidal, sub-tidal, or This project is to maintain a pier, pilings replacing timbers with pile water column? supports. The project will encompass parts of the shoreline,the inter- tidal zone and shallow sub-tidal zone approximately 0.1 acres in size. See attached narrative What are the sediment The existing intertidal and shallow subtidal sediments are coarse sand characteristics? and approximately 5% gravel with exposed stone and 5 long-standing cribs which have deteriorated to the point requiring replacement. Is Habitat Area of Particular The site is an existing harbor exposed to prevailing climatic conditions Concern (HAPC) designated at wide open to north, northwest and west winds. The bluff is eroding due or near the site? If so what to exposure to normal tidal and climatic conditions and storm driven type,size, characteristics? waves from the northwest, despite the moderate to heavy vegetative cover. Is there submerged aquatic There is a 10 to 30-foot-wide strip of eel grass(SAV)in the shallow sub- )at or adjacent tidal waters out to 50 feet beyond the Mean Low Water line but there is vegetation (SAV) to project site? ) t describe no SAV detritus on the foreshore. The pier has existed at this site for the spatial extent. decades and no configuration changes are proposed and is configured to clear the SAV, at. a height of 8 feet or more above the bottom sediments. What is typical salinity and Salinity varies somewhat seasonally but is typically in the 25-30 ppt. temperature regime/range? Temperature varies seasonally from approximately 30 degrees in the winter to 70 degrees in the summer. What is the normal frequency of Occasional, seasonal, weather dependent boating access to and from site disturbance, both natural the dock facilities along this stretch of shore. Most boating activity is and man-made? between April and November and is attributable to recreational boating. Storm disturbances are 5 to 10 per year and are usually moderate, occasionally severe.Boating disturbances and construction are minimal. What is the area of proposed Approximately 1110 acre will be directly impacted by this recreational impact(work footprint&far dock project. afield)? i Step 3. This section is used to describe the anticipated impacts from the proposed action on the physical/chemical/biological environment at the project site and areas adjacent to the site that may be affected. - _ - _ ..i rit J='i:--5 :•4• T>__� -- -=i'Y:L'3 i-" '_ _ _ _v=S'5-._- __i===+'c,ts.-.y:_i;>"r=F••y._s=-u.�: =:,o`-:c-..-;a ��`+=..;=r�: _4_ 'T''af'-t='^i=.f'.r,. >-^:xa;=;1 .,,-knti=•':+.--acs NMI .—'`�^ .�r.:+__ "; • _ - _ �_+�,..> _:d._l-„-.r'C:��,r„.ci•_TM l,,: - tx.^� d�..,,. .,-k_ti• _�;+, cC ;”-est;•Kf,=�'`-,•ti'�s - _ - _"' 'i.=_-�._-w€�._*.r-+'_ �`�_3:' �=s•:+''.:_ -7�;�"s,�..-e^=_=- ^'` QE's•".T..€_ __ _ •;•`,_� _ __.�,-•'•:..r1= 3. bMCRIPTION`,O IIIIIPi4CTS �_v Y _ _ .-a :_J:= _ _5..._ •a -.;r'� .'a4 rT�t: i_�S..vs.,r�"_ --_:-vf -_:.t-c::.t::r.ks:une tom:s" = w;.n�,,:�:-....- _ _kuR�u' : 1$wi{�. Impacts: - Y, N= Description Nature and duration of X =' _ It is anticipated that the adverse impacts from this project will ={ F be small because of the nature of the work. The project can activity(s) p J = take place in as little as a couple of weeks but will likely take a =' =s months,tide and weather permitting. Barge access will be at high tide. The pier will remain an open wood pile and timber structure. Will benthic community be X The benthic community will be only marginally disturbed by disturbed? the marine construction barge and dock facility. No excavation or"in water"filling is proposed, only pile driving. Will SAV be impacted? X SAV, eel grass has been observed in the project area, but the pier has been configured to remain in the same foot print it has occupied for decades and the eel grass has grown in and around it. Will sediments be altered and/or X Sedimentation rates in the shallow subtidal zones will not sedimentation rates change? increase or change as a result of this project. Will turbidity increase? X Turbidity, on a day to day basis,will not change significantly from existing conditions. Bottom sediment disturbances are rare due to the rocky gravelly nature of the bottom sediments. This is a highly stressed shoreline due to wave dynamics most notably during low tide boating operations. (See attached Narrative Statement) Will water depth change? X No changes in water depth are proposed by or for construction equipment access or for boating operations. Will contaminants be released X Piles treated with CCA will release small amounts of arsenic into sediments or water and copper into the water column however the NYS DEC Study column? from 2000 finds those releases acceptable and warranted in view of the need to protect and preserve the marine construction timbers. Will tidal flow, currents or wave X No. The pier is of open-pile and timber construction. patterns be altered? Will ambient salinity or X This project will have no impact on water-flow and circulation temperature regime change? or drainage and will not affect salinity. Will water quality be altered? X Water quality should not change as to a significant extent as a result of this project beyond the bottom sediment disturbances resulting from marine equipment repositioning. Step 4. This section is used to evaluate the consequences of the proposed action on the functions and values of EFH as well as the vulnerability of the EFH species and their life stages. Identifywhich species from the EFH species list (generated in Step 1) will be adversely impacted from the action. Assessment of EFH impacts should be based upon the site characteristics identified in Step 2 and the nature of the impacts described within Step 3. The Guide to EFH Descriptions webpage(http://www.nero.noaa.gov/hcdilist.htm)should be used during this assessment to determine the ecological parameters/preferences associated with each species listed and the potential impact to those parameters. -- fi. - v:;S: nf:l.•�..Y.__ -x.� :.i 'T.L�i:Sic.l'-=`s'�=_ "r-"_�'a - - .^•r•_� .z_=`a,a. _ - '��~_'.---u_.a_>•i.�_-`�` — _ - __L-:]:__.-..zf=.ir'e ---- - -5..2?i 1+.crC •�T,'-'- _ _-_ 4 EFH_;ASSESSMENT'= _ -�`�4« - -.. -t`t Functions and Values Y N Describe habitat type,species and life stages to be adversely- impacted, dverselyimpacted; _ _ 4rtdi�` �z -_:Y-�_ :�i i�'�_3.itF._ Sy P`3^(f'-u- -c'2 =- .. S _ _ -;f'-'"..a _ ��iVt„. � }-- _ 'r:.%r:d.� xs`�Y_^- -i�tr'_z`S:v=4yc-r -_h l- 7r+�i�s ri��_�:`"r' Will functions and values of 4. -' -< rvs :- -a'a =-is T,�- = - = L ;, -� = a{ay*r-'e''_�^r z_ °-i��u q-•q'.i,,*ro„__ _ T ��_r_._:_;,� a����='�Sr: r� Tru�'� 3 Vii}1..+4i -�v`l'e!.'�s `�3'•' __ - --.}_" ,�:'• <==...' ”'m.•_xv - EFH be impacted for: _- _ 3=_� ,� _� rs ._ _ -A•��- _-,;}- ,rte:;.. ;_, ZRI, Spawning The shallow subtidal zone~and inter-tidal zone are currently sandy X gravel strewn with stones and boulders and will remain so without regard to this project. No alterations of the benthos or underwater habitat are proposed. This project should have no impact on submerged aquatic vegetation.This is a moderate energy wave zone. Nursery X The shallow subtidal zone and inter-tidal zone are currently sandy gravel with a linear, shore parallel eel grass fringe colony and will remain so as a result of this project. No alterations of the benthos or underwater habitat are proposed or anticipated except for driven piles. Nursery function should remain unchanged. Forage X The shallow subtidal zone and inter-tidal zone are currently sandy gravel and will remain so as a result of this project. No adverse impact to submerged aquatic vegetation is anticipated if it does exist in nearby waters. The pier structure plies spanning the water column should provide new habitat and foraging opportunities as barnacles and algae colonize the structure in the water column. Shelter X The shallow subtidal zone and intertidal zone are currently sandy gravel offering only shelter in amongst the crib stones which are to remain and will remain so as a result of this project. No adverse impact to submerged aquatic vegetation is anticipated. The pier structure and piles do provide shelter for small fish and habitat diversity. " It is envisioned that any construction impacts experienced as a result of Will impacts be temporary or this maintenance project will be temporary and not permanent but the permanent? new structures spanning the water column will be. The area of coverage ,A =5 P 9 of the proposed piles is small compared to the area of the cove and of ' no consequence compared to the overall fringe habitat and coastal shoreline of Fishers Island. Will compensatory mitigation be X No compensatory mitigation is proposed for this project. Approximately 500 SF of land is now and will be covered by a structure. used? Approximately 750 SF of intertidal and shallow subtidal,stony,gravelly sand sediments are now and will be covered by the pier. All of these features provide water column diversity and are similar to adjacent shoreline characteristics along Fishers Island's coastal perimeter. It is envisioned that the crib stone will continue to accumulate sediments and encourage submerged aquatic vegetation and red and green algae vegetation to grow, as opposed to the adjacent open waters and high beach with its wave damage tendencies. E a Step 5. This section provides the Federal agency--s determination on the degree of impact to EFH from the proposed action. The EFH determination also dictates the type of EFH consultation`that will be required with NOAA Fisheries. _ __ _ - `:•,__ __ _ -- __ -_ _ -__ _ _,.t: - =,_�.-,__ -- r�=*",--z��s _ _ _ ->�a-_._4<'�_•?.'`:;.-..:., :r:;_F�ti.='r:�-i-Y-:ss_x,;+�;.;T=tmY�^����j', _ _�-Yi. _rr� .=i;.=_-v—•`_-;��- _ ___- - - _ __ - v'7-s.='='-..rr..m-:..;�<�-'-�-r;�-�,.,,-�+.c._�'��-- - - -__ -rte_. �c�.�N r.: max,-: - - <r,:�w��r7f.�`F- .�-T-�"�. 5:�--�DETERMINi4T10N`vQ 1MPACT4~_-T, Federal Agency=s EFH_Determination : X There is no adverse effect on EFH Overall degree of EFH Consultation is not required adverse effects on EFH (not including The adverse effect on EFH is not substantial. compensatory mitigation)will be: This is a request for an abbreviated EFH consultation. This worksheet is being submitted to NMFS to satisfy the EFH (check the appropriate Assessment requirement. statement) The adverse effect on EFH is substantial. This is a request for an expanded EFH consultation. A detailed written EFH assessment will be submitted to NMFS expanding upon the impacts revealed in this worksheet. Step 6. Consultation with NOAA Fisheries may also be required if the proposed action results in adverse impacts to other NOAA-trust resources,such as anadromous fish,shellfish,crustaceans,ortheir habitats. Some examples of other NOAA-trust resources are listed below. Inquiries regarding potential impacts to marine mammals or threatened/endangered species should be directed to NOAA Fisheries' Protected Resources Division. ----- THEF NOAA=,TRUS'T:RESOURC_ ES IMPACTASSESSMENT <<, ° z z 4 _ _ Species known to occur-: Describe habitat impact type(i.e.; ENV/RONMENTA> Y 'JEST/ONNA/RE This is intended to supplement ENG Form 4345, Application for Department of the Army Permit, or the Joint Application for Permit used in the State of New York. Please provide complete answers to all questions below which are relevant to your project. Any answers may be continued on separate-sheet(s) of paper to be-attached to this form. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT The purpose of this form is to provide the Corps of Engineers with basic information regarding your project. This information will be used to facilitate evaluation of your permit application and for public dissemination as required by regulation. Failure to provide complete information may result in your application being declared incomplete for processing, thereby delaying processing of your application. GENERAL-APPLICABLE TO ALL PROJECTS 9. Explain the need for, and purpose of, the proposed work The proposed project is to maintain 151(+/-)LF of existing 8-FT wide fixed wood pier, of which 120(+/-)LF is waterward of the AHWL, including the installation of 32 new pier support piles, maintain the landward most stone filled timber pier support crib, and remove the outermost 4 support crib timbers. Replace 3 tie-off piles and install 1 new tie-off pile, all at and waterward of the Apparent High Tide Line in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. 2. Provide the names and addresses of property owners adjacent to your work site (if not shown on the application form or project drawings). Mr. J Geddis Parsons, Parsons Capital Management Inc., 10 Weybosset Street, Suite 1000, Providence, RI 02903. Rocky Ledge Partners, LLC., P.O. Box 91, Montchanin, DE 19710-0091. (Please note that depending upon the nature and extent of your project, you may be requested to provide the names and addresses of additional property owners proximate to your project site to ensure proper coordination.) 3. Photographs of the project site should be submitted. For projects in tidal areas, photographs of the waterway vicinity should be taken at low tide. Using a separate copy of your plan view, indicate the location and direction of each photograph as well as the date and time at which the photograph- was taken. Provide a sufficient number of photographs so as to provide a clear understanding of conditions on and proximate to your project site. See attached photos. 4.,Provi- copy of any environmental iml statement, or any other environmental report r:...::.h was prepared for your project. Attached are copies of the Short and long form Environmental Review Assessment for this maintenance project. 5. Provide a thorough discussion of alternatives to your proposal. This discussion should include, but not necessarily be limited to, the "no action" alternative and alternative(s) resulting in less disturbance to waters of the United States. For filling projects in waters of the United States, including wetlands, your alternatives discussion should demonstrate that there are no practicable alternatives to your proposed filling and that your project meets with current mitigation policy(Le-. avoidance, minimization and compensation). DREDGING PROJECTS Answer the following if your project involves dredging. 1. Indicate the estimated volume of material to be dredged and the depth (below mean low water) to which dredging would occur. Would there be overdepth dredging? There is no dredging associated with this project. Z You can apply for a ten-year permit for maintenance dredging. If you wish to apply for a ten-year permit, please provide the number of additional dredging events during the ten-year life of the permit and the amount of material to be removed during future events. 3. Indicate of your drawings the dewatering area (if applicable) and disposal site for the dredged material(except landfill sites). Submit a sufficient number of photographs of the dewatering and disposal sites as applicable so as to provide a clear indication of existing conditions. For ten-year maintenance dredging permits, indicate the dewatering/disposal sites for future dredging events, if known. 4. Describe the method of dredging(i.e. clamshell, dragline, etc.) and the expected duration of dredging. 5. Indicate the physical nature of the material to be dredged(i.e. sand, silt, clay, etc.) and provide estimated percentages of the various constituents if available. For beach nourishment projects, grain size analysis data is required. 6. Describe the method of dredged material containment (i.e. hay bales, embankment, bulkhead, etc.) and whether return flow from the dewatering/disposal site would reenter any waterway. Also indicate if there would be any barge overflow. MOORING FACILITIES Answer the following if yourproject includes the construction or rehabilitation of recreational mooring facilities. 1. It is generally recommended that any fixed piers and walk ramps be limited to four feet in width, and that floats be-limited to eight feet in width and rest at least two feet above the waterway bottom at mean low water. Terminal floats at private, non- commercial facilities should be limited to 29 feet in length. If you do not believe your proposal can meet with these recommendations, please provide the reason(s). The pier is 8-FT wide and 151(+/-)FT long with no floating dock complying with all of these conditions except width. The pier has existed in this configuration since before December 16, 1968. 2. Using your plan view, show to scale the/ocation(s), position(s) and size(s) (including length, beam and draft)of vessel(s)to be moored at the proposed facility,including those of transient vessel(s) if known. 3. For commercial mooring sites such as marinas, indicate the capacity of the facility and indicate on the plan view the location(s) of any proposed fueling and/or sewage pumpout facilities. If pumpout facilities are not planned, please discuss the rationale below and indicate the distance to the nearest available pumpout station. 4.,India- n your plan view the distance to " scent marine structures, if any are proxima__--nd show the locations and dime]—.:ns of such structures. See attached application drawings. 5.,Discu he need for wave protection at I,,- `,1roposed facility. Please be advised that if a pen:...- s issued, you would be requires-.,'recognize that the mooring facility may be subject to wave action from wakes of passing vessels, whose operations would not be required to be modified. Issuance of a permit would not relieve you of ensuring the integrity of the authorized structure(s) and the United States would not be held responsible for damages to the structure(s) and vessel(s) moored thereto from wakes from passing vessels. There is no good opportunity for wave protection at this site. Waves from the wave field northwesterly to northeasterly of the site are unobstructed in their approach, however, wave boards would tend to over stress the pier structure and so it was felt that the boat should be removed from the site when rough weather approaches and leave the pier supporting piles open and the wave path unobstructed. BULKHEAD/NG/BANK STABILIZA TION/FILLING ACTIVITIES Answer the following if your project inclues construction of bullfheading(also retaining walls and seawalls) with backfill, filling of waters/wetlands, or any other bank stabilization fills such as riprap, revetments, gabions, etc. 1. Indicate the total volume of fill (including backfill behind a structure such as a bulkhead) as well as the volume of fill to be placed into waters of the United States. The amount of fill in waters of the United States can be determined by calculating the amount of fill to be placed below the plane of spring high tide in tidal areas and below ordinary high water in non-tidal areas. There is no bulkheading/bank stabilizations or filling activity proposed in this dock maintenance application. 2. Indicate the source(s) and type(s) of fill material. 3. Indicate the method of fill placement(i.e. by hand, bulldozer, crane, etc.). Would any temporary fills be required in waterways or wetlands to provide access for construction equipment? If so, please indicate the area of such waters and/or wetlands to be filled, and show on the plan and sectional views. There is no fill to be placed. The for ing requests basic information,,— , the most common types of projects requinn;r department of the Army permits. intended to obviate or reduce the need for requesting additional information; however, additional information may be requested above and beyond what is requested in this form. Please feel free to add any additional information regarding your project which you believe may facilitate our review. Please see the attached narrative. LCMG FINY,LLC FISHERS ISLAND SOUND FISHERS ISLAND,NEW YORK NARRATIVE STATEMENT & SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR NYS DEC,NYS/DOS AND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATIONS August 2018 GENERAL LCMG FINY, LLC owns parcel 1000-2.-1-14.1 off Clay Point Road a private road, located along the west shore of Clay Point along Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island. The site is generally moderately sloped, sandy gravel ,soils, vegetated with grass, brush, landscaping ground cover and trees. The frontage of the property is approximately 400 feet along Fishers Island Sound at the east shore, abutted by the Mr. J Geddis Parsons property to the north and Rocky Ledge Partners, LLC to the south. The waterfront consists of a partially rock-covered beach with tidal wetlands vegetation at the base of the moderately sloped coastal bluff in the vicinity of the pier. It is LCMG FINY, LLC desire to maintain the existing fixed pier dock system but using driven wood piles to replace the deteriorated cribs. The pier will be at an end elevation of 6 feet above Mean Low Water (MLW), sloping upward and crossing over the boulder-strewn intertidal zone above the bottom sediments until reaching a finished elevation of about 10 feet to shore at that elevation, stopping short of the bank where it comes ashore with a ramped section of about 20 foot length which allows passage of the public on the rocky beach below; a rare event. Attached are application drawings prepared for this project showing this configuration and pertinent details. This supplemental narrative has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Town of Southold, Ordinance No. 6, 2004, and the Waterfront Revitalization Program related to docks and shorefront improvements. In addition, various coastal policies under the New York State Coastal Management Act are addressed herein for review by the New York State Department of State and Department of Environmental Conservation. This project is maintenance of a longstanding pier and dock facility. DESCRIPTION OF WORK As mentioned in the introductory paragraph, this project is to retain and maintain a fixed wood pile and timber pier changing the supports from cribs to piles along the shore out into Fishers Island Sound in accordance with existing guidelines set forth in the Town of Southold ordinance No. 6, 2004. It is envisioned that this structure will be built utilizing the following general sequence and methodology. ➢ The marine contractor will arrive by water with barge-mounted crane and push boats. ➢ The existing pier will be maintained, and all wood salvaged from the cribs for disposal in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and ordinances. ➢ New piles will be driven starting at the shore landing end of the pier and proceeding waterward at roughly 10-foot intervals to the waterward end of the pier. These piles will be driven by double-acting air hammer to a bearing capacity of 20 tons and pull-out resistance of approximately 10 tons. This generally requires about twelve to fifteen feet of embedment of the pile in the bearing stratum. Because of the exposure with the prevailing wind westerly 1 J � J wave field, these piles will be 12-inch'nominal diameter class B Southern Yellow Pine pressure treated to 2.5 pcf of CCA Type C. ➢ After the piles are installed, split caps (also referred to as split clamps) consisting of a pair of pressure treated Southern Pine timbers, 4 x 10 to 4 x 12 nominal dimension, will be bolted to the piles transversely forming a pile bent. Stringers will be then laid on the split caps parallel to the length of the pier. In all likelihood, five runs of stringers will be set and will probably consist of 3 x 10 pressure-treated Southern Pine. ➢ The outer stringer on each side will be bolted or spiked to the pile to secure it against wave uplift forces that this pier might be exposed to. ➢ After the stringers have been connected to the piles and split caps, the decking will be installed. In accordance with Town of Southold's Ordinance No. 6, 2004, this decking will not be CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine but rather oak, cedar hardwood or plastic / composite such as "Timber Tech" or similar synthetic, composite or plastic material with the brushed side mounted up. If composites or plastic are used, it will be either gray, brown or natural in color. Decking will be attached to the stringers utilizing galvanized nails or stainless-steel Phillips or flathead square-drive wood screws about 3 inches long and will be set with a V4" gap between deck planks. ➢ The over-water decking will run level at a height of up to eight feet above the existing bottom sediments in the shallow subtidal zone. See Sheet 4 of the application drawings for the pier profile. ➢ The piles will be about 42 inches above the deck surface and support horizontal rail members. ➢ The mid-rail can be timber or cable and both details are shown. ➢ A top rail of cedar, oak, hardwood or Timber Tech material will be installed for safety. ➢ Water and electricity will be run out on the pier in the space between the stringers so that trickle chargers on the boat may be powered during tie-ups. The water will allow boats to be rinsed off after usage. A power post with an internal light will be mounted to the end of the fixed pier with receptacles to provide power to the boats from extension cords. The power post will also have coiling arms for storage of the electric service cord and hose between uses. Because the dock may be used during the hours of darkness, low-intensity lights will be mounted on staggered piles or dock rail posts to illuminate the deck and the walking surface up the bank. This system will be manually, or radio controlled with a shut-off timer so that the lights will only be on when necessary for safety of the users. LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION POLICIES The Town of Southold, LWRP policies that are applicable to the dock proposal are a local refinement of the Long Island Sound Regional Coastal Management Program policies that apply throughout Long Island Sound. The Goss site is off Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island and is characterized predominately as undeveloped coast or natural coast. The undeveloped coast policies are applicable as follows: ➢ Policy I is to foster a pattern of development that enhances community character and preserves natural resources to the maximum extent and minimizes adverse impacts on the environment, ➢ Policy 2 is to preserve historic resources, ➢- Policy 3 is to enhance and protect scenic resources and visual quality. The pier maintenance and crib removal for LCMG FINY, LLC is consistent with waterfront development on Fishers Island and in coastal areas. The pier is made of suitably-sized timbers and utilizes the materials allowable under Local Law #6 with due consideration of climatic conditions at the site and replacement components will conform as well. This proposal is consistent with other 2 adjacent dock facilities and characteristics for the visual and scenic considerations. The encroachment is not significant, to be consistent with DEC policies, Southold Local Law #6, US ACOE policies and the structure is as low profile as possible, consistent with the safe and efficient use of the waters and consistent with the tidal and wave exposure of this site. Lighting will be minimal for operational safety and otherwise off, and lights will be utilized only when necessary for boating purposes so that during hours of darkness there will be no adverse impact NATURAL COAST POLICIES The Natural Coastal Policies are 4 through 8 and require consideration as follows: ➢ Policy 4—Minimize loss of life, structures and natural resources from flooding and erosion, ➢ Policy 5—Protect and improve water quality ➢ Policy 6—Protect and restore the quality and function of the eco-system, ➢ Policy 7—Protect and improve air quality, ➢ Policy 8 - Minimize environmental degradation primarily from solid waste and hazardous substances. The pier maintenance crib removal for LCMG FINY, LLC recreational boating facility has been laid out and configured so as to be the same footprint as the pier which has been here for decades, consistent with the DEC permit requirements for such structures and in accordance with recommendations of the Marine Habitat Protection Bureau offered during the workshop pre- application. There was no tidal wetlands vegetation on the beach where the pier begins. The pier has been configured high, over submerged aquatic vegetation which has grown around the pier in the shallow subtidal waters. As such, it provides adequate height to clear environmental resources of concern and the materials to be utilized are consistent with Town of Southold's Local Law #6 regarding environmental quality and the use of pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine timber components in particular. Pier maintenance work will have no adverse impacts on air quality as a result of this structure and the work on the dock should not diminish overall environmental considerations in Fishers Island Sound. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9 sets forth a priority to provide for public access and recreational use of coastal waters, public lands and public resources of the Town. This project maintains a longstanding (decades old) recreational boating facility for the LCMG FINY, LLC property and so is consistent with this policy. WORKING COAST POLICIES The policies of this section relate to the following: ➢ Policy 10 — Protection of the Town's water-dependent uses and promoting new water- dependent uses in suitable locations, ➢ Policy 11 —Promoting sustainable use of living marine resources, ➢ Policy 12—Protect agricultural lands, ➢ Policy 13 —Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. While most of the Working Coast Policies are not applicable to this site or this type of project, Policy 10, promoting water-dependent uses and the siting of water-dependent uses in appropriate areas is applicable. The proposed maintenance project makes the most beneficial use of the land and keeping the dock facility in the most appropriate, historic point of the land where access down the 3 4 bank will not require changes in structural facilities and can be accommodated with path work rather than formal stairs and so on. This project has been laid out with specific reference and review of the Waterfront Revitalization Program policies and is considered to be consistent. In summary, the dock is typical of recreational boating facilities throughout the area and all along coastal New England. The pier structure maintains the same length, width,height, and structure so as to be consistent with other facilities of a similar nature and the minimum necessary components to accommodate safe and efficient boating operations from this site safely in a variety of climatic conditions. Pile supports will be utilized instead of cribs and old crib timbers will be removed leaving the stone on the bottom for habitat diversity. This project does not interfere with public access or use of public trust waters and lands of the State, it does not interfere with navigation, it will not create soil or sedimentation erosion problems, it does not adversely environmental resources and in the area where the facility must span the intertidal zone at the shore line, the facility will be maintained in the area of rocks where environmental resources have already acclimated to the pier and boating activity so as not to worsen any of these conditions. The height of the structure has been specifically addressed so as to maintain clearance above the shoreline tidal wetlands plants if other conditions are conducive to such growth. The dock facility maintenance reach out to 4 feet of water in Fisher Island Sound so that dredging will not be an issue in the future, thus further minimizing adverse environmental impacts. More than 95% of the LCMG F1NY, LLC shoreline will remain in a natural state as a result of these considerations for design. There is no loss of valuable marine and wetland habitat and no water quality degradation as a result of this project. No natural protective features or processes will be adversely impacted as a result of the maintenance work on the docking facility. Dense growth areas of submerged aquatic vegetation in the proposed dock or berthing area have been avoided. Reference is made to the NYS DEC study from 2000 indicating the suitability of pressure- treated Southern Yellow Pine piles and super-structure components for this type of purpose. The piles must be 12-inch diameter due to site exposure. In accordance with Local Law#6, decking for the pier and the approach ramp will be of woods other than Southern Yellow Pine or plastic. This project is consistent with zoning policies and ordinances for the Town. The dock facility will be an accessory to the home located at this site. There will be no development of the upland related to this dock facility that will create point sources of pollution or drainage. This project is providing recreational boating and water usage opportunities compatible with the natural resource values and characteristics of the site. The dock is existing sized for stability considerations especially acknowledging that waves from the north can come in from Fishers Island Sound and the dock is angled more or less into those waves. REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 97-25 OF THE WETLANDS LAW 6,2004 The permittee acknowledges that the validity of this permit is subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. The permittee does, by the acceptance of this permit, assume all responsibility for operations undertaken pursuant to this permit, and shall take all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property resulting from such operations. By such acceptance, the permittee also agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Town and its officers. The permittee gives consent to the Town and its officers, employees and agents to enter upon the premises where such operations are being conducted to make such inspections to determine whether said operations are being conducted in conformity with the permit. 4 `i he permittee will notify the Trustees in writing one week prior to initiation of any and all operations. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing upon completion of operations such that the site can be inspected for issuance for a certificate of compliance. In response to Sub-section 2a and the General Rules for Standards of Residential and Commercial Docks,the following additional information is offered. 1. Permits for the work are being applied for through the Town, US ACOS, NYS DEC and a coastal zone consistency determination by the NYS DOS. 2. The new piles to be installed will be of sturdy, durable and stable materials; in all likelihood, Greenhart, Kakaralli or CCA Type C pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine (SYP) 12-inch diameter class B piles with new split caps and braces of pressure-treated SYP materials. These members will be a minimum of 3 x 8's and more often, 3 x 10's and 4 x 10's with at least one 1-inch bolt per connection, and in other cases, two 3/ inch bolts per connection. This pier is a fixed, pile-supported timber structure and therefore will not adversely affect the free circulation of water or reduce the effects of fluctuating water levels in Fishers Island Sound or West Harbor. In addition,the pier does not present any adverse modification of the shoreline. The pier's end elevation is such that in extreme high flood tides the structure will be inundated. The structure's SYP timber materials represent the standard of the industry being specifically grown a renewable resource for this type of usage and are capable of withstanding full immersion. With the connections described above, this structure will be able to survive repeated inundations and even direct waves at high tide elevations with a structural life of approximately 20 years. 3. The pier support will include driving new 12-inch diameter piles at 10-foot intervals to the maximum extent possible in order to obtain the desired pier alignment and support intervals. The pier is situated toward the northerly line of West Harbor, however this part of the shoreline would be more accurately characterized as Fishers Island Sound from the wave exposure design perspective. While Southold Local Law 6 dictates smaller piles sizes, such piles would be inadequate in,this location. Waves of 2 to 3 feet are not uncommon at this site, hence the ravaged shoreline features. Clay Point extends out to the north beyond Osprey Point on the west edge of West Harbor. Waves from Long Island Sound can be influenced by a fetch of a hundred miles. These waves can defract and refract around North Hill and come right at this site. The piles proposed for this project will need to be 12-inch Class B piles with 8-inch tips in order to withstand the sea conditions and driving conditions. The use of CCA pressure-treated timbers and Class B 12-inch piles can thus be approved for this project in accordance with Local Law 6. 4. The pier will not be decked with CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine. This pier/ walkway provides a safe pedestrian surface for access to the berthed boat. Rails shown to may be installed on the pier for safety. 5 it l �. The pier is located near the centei-of the property line. The 15-foot clearance specified in this paragraph has been honored and should not be an issue because the proposed pier does not represent a significant encroachment into the boating operation area of the property to the south or to the north nor does it project into the navigation way for other boaters in the Harbor. 6. Upon receipt of the permit for this project, appropriate permit numbers and a Town permit placard will be affixed to the most seaward face of the pier for identification from the water. 7. . There are no permanent structures located above the pier decking, nor are any planned at this time, other than the power post and railing which are fixed by function. 8. It is currently possible to provide a five-foot passage way beneath this pier and that access ability will be retained landward of the apparent high-water line. There is only minimal room to walk under the pier at high tide, however, foot traffic in this area is rare, if at all and so the additional structure of an up and over stairway has been left out of this pier layout. NEW YORK STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM These application documents include a copy of the Federal Consistency Assessment Form utilized for the New York State Coastal Management Program under the jurisdiction of the New York State Department of State. The following policies have been identified as pertinent to this application and the reason for consistency associated with this project is outlined in each respective case. Policy 2 Water Dependent Uses—This project is to maintain a fully functional water dependent use, a recreational boating dock facility at this site in support of recreational boating. Policy 5 —Use of Existing Developed Shorefront—There is no developed shoreline on this site. This project utilizes natural existing shorefront which is dominated by an accumulation of stone which has abundant vegetative resources such as bittersweet, poison ivy and junipers with only sporadic patches of tidal wetlands vegetation or individual plants. The project will be to rebuild the pier and remove crib timbers to the existing shoreward terminus to make it safe and reliably usable in most weather conditions without impeding shoreline public access. Policy 7 — Significant Fish & Wildlife Habitat— Protection of significant fish and wildlife habitat has been considered in the development of this project layout. The pier, to the shoreward point of beginning, has avoided the shoreline spartina patches and runs 4 to 5 feet above the rocky intertidal sediments and should not jeopardize the health of any shoreline vegetation. Typically, there is a slight environmental benefit to a pier project because of the creation of structure in the water column where barnacles, algae and crustaceans will colonize and grow. The alignment of the pier remains as is so as not to adversely affect the eel grass fringe strip that follows the 3 to 4 contours around the existing pier. Policy 8 —Protection & Preservation of Habitat— Protection and preservation of habitat has also been considered in this project and the dock structure is being kept to its longstanding configuration and of materials consistent with standards of the industry and restrictions set forth in the Wetlands Law, No. 6, 2004 set forth by the Town of Southold and standards of the NYS DEC. The pier point of origin will remain over a stony part of the beach to make use of the least habitat and minimize damage to natural resources. 6 Policy 11 —Minimize Damage to Natural Resources - The dock construction project has been laid out in such a way so as to minimize damage or impact to natural resources as identified in Policy 7 above. The dock facility will remain in its longstanding location where stone on the beach has already impacted shoreline vegetation and the length is the minimum practical length for the slip to reach 4 feet of water depth at MLW. Policy 14 — No Measurable Increase in Flooding - This project consists of construction of an open wood pile and timber pier which in no way adversely affects waterflow and circulation in West Harbor or Fishers Island Sound or flooding potential of the area. Flood levels all around Fishers Island are dictated by water levels in Long Island Sound, Fishers Island Sound and Block Island Sound and this structure will have no adverse influence or in any way impact on those levels. Policy 15 —No Dredging—Dredging is not required in this project. The dock will be maintained out in its current location and configuration to avoid any dredging requirements. The depth of 4 feet, as generally recommended by the NYS DEC and US ACOE, has been reached. The waters are not protected enough that boats can be berthed bow to shore but rather bow out in the deeper water. The boat will not ground out at low tide. Policy 19 — Impact on Public Access —Public access will not be jeopardized or impeded as a result of this project. As a matter of fact, there is almost no public access usage of the public trust lands or waters at this site except kayaking and canoeing and that is rare. The intertidal zone is significantly covered by stone and boulders and that is common on adjacent properties. The shallow sub-tidal waters do not present any opportunity or enticement for public access in the area. The pier stops well short of the landward 25% of the waterway width in accordance with US ACOE policies. West Harbor is more that a mile wide at this point. Thus, public access to the State's lands and waters will not be adversely affected by the project. Policy 20 — Public Trust Compatibility with Existifi�z Adjoining Properties and Land Uses- Public Trust compatibility with existing adjoining properties and land uses have also been considered in this project. Several nearby properties have docking facilities similar to this one and this docking facility will not interfere with existing or the likely configuration of future facilities on immediately adjoining properties or the logical allocation of littoral development rights. Policy 21 —Water Dependent Recreation—This project is consistent with water-dependent recreational opportunities policies set forth in this section. Policy 24 —Scenic Resources, Impairment or Loss - This policy is designed to prevent impairment or loss of scenic resources. The length, height and width of the fixed wood pile and timber pier will not represent such an extent of encroachment or structure which would create a loss of scenic resources on adjacent or nearby properties or views from the water. Policy 25 — Enhance Overall Scenic Quality= The maintained dock structure will be consistent with the scenic quality of the area and prevent loss of scenic resources as described in Policy 24 above. Policy 44 — Preserve and Protect Tidal Wetlands — It is acknowledged that the spartina alterna flora exists sporadically in very small patches along the shorefront. The maintenance of the fixed wood pile and timber pier will take advantage of the un-vegetated strip of the shoreline caused by the longstanding pier landing over stone in order to avoid adverse wetlands vegetation impact. The height of the pier should allow opportunities for the growth of the spartina fringe marsh naturally up to, and to an extent, beneath the wood pier if other conditions are suitable, and the same with submerged aquatic vegetation. 7 SUMMARY This project is for pier maintenance for recreational boating access at property of the LCMG FINY, LLC on Fishers Island. A copy of all US Army Corps of Engineers, NYS DEC and Town of Southold applications are attached as substantiation for this project. This project complies with applicable standards of the New York State Coastal Management Act, NYS / DEC Tidal Wetland Regulations and criteria for approval, the Town of Southold Waterfront Revitalization Program and Local Ordinance No. 6, 2004 and its approval is thus respectfully requested. Respectfully submitted, DOCKO, INC. e Keith B.Neilson, P.E. 8 i mai s N 41 FISHERS ISLAND 50 _ - SOUND 20 22 y't 123 �� �~ qg --•.:r v.-•.�_ 8^v31 38 ' �Wr rFVrGI�I 1 Vr , 34 F C p JABSW LTD.PARTNERSHIP24 ;1$ SITE "_C��;1ft+=,-`:: �iJ-.$`t'•t�,�.y�;:t.t,;. ,, g �`•-•Y�fii�L;�.y�: 't:";�4�,�r��,'_�i;�,-''.;,:�.,•�:z+:,, ,so ; FI.SF-IEF� ISLAND - •--:�:�::� - ':.., :�$�;�.�: �,,�• �,=:':�;�=•�'jt';;�h.<��,� :e�,s�. „'o SOUND - • _ ' ' ' - ah, •�,,:,Vy*y.; �, 'ara�� '13...rit' --SITE':•.. - • •� ��% h, }}��jr� 'r/VVO)'�^�r •s T �� :PROPERTY:. �� i':'�u5'r�i`E'��"`'�'r!¢^`F�-'R'�t �_•�`�f;.�r YµS":^,,• � �,j�,_4, .. ,'• •_ SPIZAPHIC SCALE PROJECT DOCK 220000 2.NY is=�-•` RECONSTRUCTION NOTES 1.ELEVATION DATUM IS MEAN LOW WATER(MLW� �; '`_":• �;~' '' `y`• fid.-. •ri.r M' � ,;s• r ;.. t:'i;.:•*: 2 TIDE DATA LS,TAKEN FROM 200 NOAA TIDE TABLES REFERENCE:SB.VER EFi COVE BASED ON `�`=:z:; r��+; ti :�:;` ��:°'' NEW LONDON.GT :`�,� i'•„' r,°r r'" ,;.. 11Y._tL';'-.� 3.PROJECT DESCRIPTION:MAINTAIN VLF OF a':"`- _ "'` ,;•„ e.: EXISTING 8-FT WIDE FD®WOOD PIER OF WHICH .ROCKY L-6031F G WATERWARD OF THE AHWI.,INCLUDING THE _ �':,;PARTNERS INSTALLATION OF THIRTY TWO NEW PIER SUPPORT PILES,MAINTAIN THE LANDWARD-MOST r•.,. STONE491 1 11MBER PER SUPPORT CRIB,AND REMOVE THE OUTERMOST FOUR SUPPORT CRIB _x�J:* •;;;�- '"'�a}- =cr: =_'•` TIMBERS.REPLACE THREE ME-OFF PILES AND INSTALL ONE NEW TIE-OFF PILE,ALL AT AND WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH TIDE UNE IN OPEN WATERS OF F SHER9 ISLAND SOUND. : 4,PROJECT PURPOSE FISI--IERs I�LANI� ' _ THIS 6 A PRIVATE DOCK FOR RECREATIONAL TOWN of SOUTHOLD BOATING. 5.THESE APPLICATION DRAWINGS REPRESENT A COMPILATION OF SURVEYS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT PURPOSES.THEY ARE NOT CONSIRUCTION 6.ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERSc CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.A TOWN BUILDING PERMIT MAY BE REGIUIR D. MR J GEDDLS PARSONS SOUTR PARSONS,CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC. ROCKY LEDGE PARTNERS LLC �v4LL 10 WEYB05SET 51 57E 1000 PO BOX 91 PROVIDENCE,RL 02903 MONTCHANIN,DE 19710-0091 GRAPHC SCALE 1'■200' 200 100 0 20o PROJECT- DOCK MAINTENANCE OF LOCATION: F&iERS ISLAND—TOWN of SOUT1-IOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK KEI r WATERWAY: FI5H13RS ISLAND SOUND DATE JANLIARY 86 2M D 0 CYC 0 * APPUGWI11- LCMG FWY.LLC .f n AGENT: SHAT 1 OF 3 l _ 06869 � DCS O, INC.KaM B.NabM PE 90F SSIO�AV Myst1G CT 00900 R P 0 $ &► 860 5715939 FAX 860 512 7569 DWG 17-09-2876 EMA L-olicagdodw=m kerth 5 Neilson,Docko Inc 9/19/2018 255 PM Ooss_Plorg Permff 0 dw9 AS r J N FISHERS ISL l) SOUND 0 172 XV 4fx05 x1¢ I I II EXISTING T1E.0�P1L.E TO \ Q t \\1 O I I I I 1RG!• f�I WlW71MCG �I r-.eAI;EAO x_,+ x_51 F EEL GRA55X ! I I t o D45T ANG B-FT WIDP ASD I \\ \\ NEW ,�NTAIN®(`11'p) TO 1E I )OSTING SUPPORT POSTAlLP P 1 TO BE REPLACED ,� 5 AVFSiAGE HIGH' I I I I x26 x-rf2 -+ WATR3. s-2 4{/ / I 160 ` x-13 �...�.� /AREA OF x-116 I / 1 xt5 Jpq\ \ 1 � _ r 1 . s / 5 s� GRASS ` 1 147 1 �lNEEyW RM \ /x fs6 r/ WF VR PILE - A 1 xq5 I / •� �}yp0 L REMAIN/REPLACE TO r I Q' -W�25t I I i I POF ROPERTY / 9X9VN6 STONE F LLED I I I I I GO55 1 TIMBER CRIB TO BE I I I S6 REMOVE 9NSTING STONE RL LLV--4 �G CRIB T1MBEIPM� SUPPORTS LAZE VA*�ALE i _ MAINTAINED I I I \ \ /w....� S `T/r OF 1 -29 T I'.1 MEAN LOW WATM---j KATP- .. -t9 I �� N I _ `I ���-'r: + '=� •, UNE x_21 _ ARTA x_,. xa4 I l = :{~' :a,= i I II 1 OF EEL x-�(' I � ;`I'. +k; . 'z : X-92 Ix 8y�// I x65Q a :: F KEY //j ` x_1.t .129. f=~•�'Y-:'Y.- - AREA OF EEL G5 NVF PROPEKIY OF PL_AlV �/I EVA/ SURVEY by-W-ES BERNARM LAND SURVEYING LLG GRAPFIC-*C*6LE i30' ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON MEAN LOW WATER '■ PR 30 0 30 ma.- DOCK MAINTENANCE Q 4, LOCATION: SLAW-TOWN OFS UlI}iO D yt`Q� ON KE y ~� SUFF=COUNTY,NEW YOM WATERWAY: FISHERS fSLAND SOUND DATE JANLtARY&2018 0 C Y{ 0 t �0 1c APPLICANT LO*IG FINY.LLC w AGBV f SHAFT 2 OF 3 f OA_ �88892.1 �� O 0, INC. �DO �FESS1 BOO 672 89W FAX SW 512 7569 DWG V-0-0-2876 EMAIL:odadcorcm Keith B Neilson,Oocka Inc. 9/13/2018 25.4 PI-1 Goss Plling Permit 2B.dwg Nam mE-oF:F Pus Nor SHOWN IN mqs viEw PROFILE FOR CLARITY OF:PER AND ITS,GOMPONENT5GPAFHC SCALE 1 10 0091 IG PALS CrYP) 10 3 0 10 NEW PIER SUPPORT PILE TOP all,EX/4,-FT ABOVE DECK(T-rP) U_%SL.Om ML 3.&- IA=1 smcns BE MAKrAffSW -Lw 01 4Tq0)W-1A1E • 4 AM FWOR-F-' NEW PER SUPPORT FXED WOOD AER REMOVE STONE F7LI-W CRS MIZ TOP 0"AT712N TO BE FMTANED old TIMBERS REPLACE with PILE 4d,FT ABOVE DECK(rYP) FL=rz(TYP oF4) MLwo.o ,I � ( r•}-•�•F.�:y ( vi:..'•2:�: 'S�~ i (I.+:•: .. ...a.b^<N� I fl.�•, Ah!"ti"( I •�:L";'.�•yirr w.r.1,4 "Y:,."G 4»gip. NOTE OWS) EXISTING 8-Fr WIDE MED NOT SHOWN IN THS FIN WOOD PIER TO BE RETAINED NG PALS 716iiiiOFF CLAJRITYOF and MAINTAINED(TYP) PIL=_ TO BE PERANDITS MAINTAIN C40MPONENTS NEW PIER SUPPORT-' REPLACED PILE TOP EL 4&F-T 11FENDEANO AT I 7,op EL. END OF PIER 17:W-T(nIP) ABOVE DECK Ml:� 1 _HTL3.&- HHW 2-06 —MLW0.0- sl GIMP EEL GRA99 GROSS BRlN0N9v 7 �j MATE ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON MEAN LOW WATER(MM4 GOPICSCALE 1*=10' PPMECT. DOCK MAINTENANCE LOCA110M FRSHERS,S.AM-TOWN VFSOUTI-IOID SUFFaX COUNTY, F94ERS ISLAND SOUNDNEWYORK 0.0 ,O.E WATERWAY. DAM JAN.LW 86 2018 1 c K APPLICANT: LCM FINY,UZ Lu AGENT SHEET 3 OF:3 uj DOCK0, INC. 4A I KOM&Negm%PE 692 . o myeft cr 06-go j?Jy? p P 0 8,005M,89W FAX 8603M7569 DWG 17-09-2876 EMAJL-offlaedbrdozom Ke-th 8 Nellsor%Docka Inc 9/3/2015 253 PM Gvo5o__P11lng PemM-3B dwg Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:office@docko.com September 13, 2018 NYS Department of State Office of Planning and Development Attn: Consistency Review Unit One Commerce Plaza-Suite 100 99 Washington Avenue Albany,NY 12231 Re: LCMG FINY,LLC Property, Fishers Island Dock Maintenance To Whom It May Concern: On behalf of LCMG FINY, LLC, we submit the attached Federal Consistency Assessment Form for dock maintenance in Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island, New York. We enclose herewith the following in support of this permit application: ❖ Two prints each of plans titled: Project: "Dock Maintenance" Location: Fishers Island, Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York Waterway: Fishers Island Sound Applicant: LCMG FINY, LLC Agent: Docko, Inc. ❖ Two copies of the NYS DOS Coastal Management Federal Consistency Assessment Forms with Narrative, Location Map, Tax Assessor's Map, and photographs. ❖ One copy each of USACOE and NYS DEC application packages. I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable: please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, DOCKO, INC. 4�6JZ,_-,1u Keith B.Neilson, P.E. KBN: cb Enclosure CC: Ms. Leslie Goss NYS DEC: Regulatory Affairs ACOE File: 17-09-2876 GOSS NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Federal Consistency Assessment Form An applicant,seeking a permit,license,waiver,certification or similar type of approval from a federal agency which is subject to the New York State Coastal Management Program(CMP),shall complete this assessment form for any proposed activity that will occur within and/or directly affect the State's Coastal Area. This form is intended to assist an applicant in certifying that the proposed activity is consistent with New York State's CMP as required by U.S. Department of Commerce regulations(15 CFR 930.57).It should be completed at the time when the federal application is prepared. The Department of State will use the completed form and accompanying information in its review of the applicant's certification of consistency. A.APPLICANT (please print) 1.Name: LCMG FINY,LLC, Leslie O. Goss 2.Address: 11888 SW Breyman Avenue, Portland, CT 97219 3.Telephone: Area Code( ) 503-819-7818 B.PROPOSED ACTIVITY 1.Brief description of activity: hilaintain 151(+/--)1 E of existing A-El wide fixed wood pier,of which 190(+I-)l E is watenuard of the AHAA11 including the installation of 32 new pier support piles,maintain the landward most stone filled timber pier support crib,and remove the outermost 4 support crib timbers.Replace 3 tie-off piles and install 1 new tie- off pile,all at and waterward of the Apparent High Tide line in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. 2.Purpose of activity- This ctivi This is a private dock for recreational boating. 3.Location of activity: Suffolk Fishers Island,Town of Southold 3773 Clay Point Road County City,Town,or Village Street or Site Description 4.Type of federal permit/license required:Town of Southold, NYSDEC, US ACOE Rivers and Harbors Act 5.Federal application number,if known:pending 6.If a state permit/license was issued or is required for the proposed activity,identify the state agency and provide the application or permit number,if known: C.COASTAL ASSESSMENT Check either"YES"or"NO"for each of these'questions. The numbers following each question refer to the policies described in the CMP document(see footnote on page 2)which may be affected by the proposed activity. 1.Will the proposed activity result in any of the following: YES/NO a.Large physical change to a site within the coastal area which will require the preparation of an environmental impact statement? (11,22,25,32,37,38,41,43). .. . . .. . . .. .. .. . ❑ b.Physical alteration of more than two acres of land along the shoreline,land under water or coastal waters? (2, 11, 12,20,28,35,44).. .. .. .. . . .. .. . ... .. .. . . . . c.Revitalization/redevelopment of a deteriorated or underutilized waterfront site? (1). . .. . . [L d. Reduction of existing or potential public access to or along coastal waters? (19,20) .. .. .. Q JZ e.Adverse effect upon the commercial or recreational use of coastal fish resources? (9,10). .. ❑- f. Siting of a facility essential to the exploration,development and production of energy resources in coastal waters or on the Outer Continental Shelf? (29).. ...... .. ... . .. .. . ❑_ g. Siting of a facility essential to the generation or transmission of energy? (27).. .. . . . . . . . a -0 h.Mining,excavation,or dredging activities,or the placement of dredged or fill material in coastal waters? (15,35).. .. . . . . .. . . .. .. .. .. . . .. . . .. .. .... . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Q i.Discharge of toxics,hazardous substances or other pollutants into coastal waters? (8, 15,35) Q j.Draining of stormwater runoff or sewer overflows into coastal waters? (33).. .... .. .. .. ❑. -0 k. Transport,storage,treatment,or disposal of solid wastes or hazardous materials? (36,39). Q. J0 1.Adverse effect upon land or water uses within the State's small harbors? (4).. . .. . .. . .. . Q -0 2.Will the proposed activity affect or be located in,on,or adjacent to any of the following: YES/NO a. State designated freshwater or tidal wetland? (44) .. .. .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . .. . .. . .. .. . . . ❑ to b.Federally designated flood and/or state designated erosion hazard area? (11, 12, 17,) . . . . . GF c. State designated significant fish and/or wildlife habitat? (7)... . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . ... . . . d. State designated significant scenic resource or area? (24). . ... .. . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . _ e. State designated important agricultural lands? (26). .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. . . . . .. g f.Beach,dune or barrier island? (12). .. ...... . . .. .. .. .. .. .. ❑_ . .. .. . ... .. .. ... . . . . g.Major ports of Albany,Buffalo,Ogdensburg,Oswego or New York? (3). .. .. .. . . .. .. .. ❑_ h. State,county,or local park? (19,20).. ... .. .. . . . .. .. . i.Historic resource listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places? (23). .. .. .. . Q 3.Will the proposed activity require any of the following: YES/NO a.Waterfront site? (2,21,22). . . . .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . ... .. .. .. b.Provision of new public services or infrastructure in undeveloped or sparsely populated sections of the coastal area? (5) . ... . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. . ... .. .. .. .. .. .. ❑ c.Construction or reconstruction of a flood or erosion control structure? (13, 14, 16).. . . . . . Q d.State water quality permit or certification? (30,38,40) .. . .... . ... . .. .. . .... . .... . . �❑ e. State air quality permit or certification? (41,43). .. . ..... .. .. .. .... .... .. .. .. .. .. Q 4. Will the proposed activity occur within and/or affect an area covered by a State approved local waterfront revitalization program? (see policies in local program document). . . . .. .. .. .. .. ❑ r~` i D.ADDITIONAL STEPS 1.If all of the questions in Section C are answered"NO",then the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the documentation required by Section F. 2.If any of the questions in Section C are answered"YES",then the applicant or agent is advised to consult the CMP,or where appropriate,the local waterfront revitalization program document*.The proposed activity must be analyzed in more detail with respect to the applicable state or local coastal policies. On a separate page(s),the applicant or agent shall: (a) identify,by their policy numbers,which coastal policies are affected by the activity,(b)briefly assess the effects of the activity upon the policy; and,(c)state how the activity is consistent with each policy. Following the completion of this written assessment,the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the documentation required by Section F. E.CERTIFICATION The applicant or agent must certify that the proposed activity is consistent with the State's CMP or the approved local waterfront revitalization program,as appropriate. If this certification cannot be made,the proposed activity shall not be undertaken. If this certification can be made,complete this Section. "The proposed activity complies with New York State's approved Coastal Management Program,or with the applicable approved local waterfront revitalization program,and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program." LCMG FINY,LLC �—eAi( . � C+ Applicant/Agent's Name: Address: 11888 SW Breyman Avenue,Portland,OR 97219 Telephone: Area Code( 503 )819-7418 Applicant/Agenfs Signature: Date: F.SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS 1.The applicant or agent shall submit the following documents to the New York State Department of State,Office of Coastal,Local Government and Community Sustainability,Attn:Consistency Review Unit, 1 Commerce Plaza,99 Washington Avenue-Suite 1010,Albany,New York 12231. a. Copy of original signed form b. Copy of the completed federal agency application. c. Other available information which would support the certification of consistency. 2.The applicant or agent.shall also submit a copy of this completed form along with his/her application to the federal agency. 3. If there are any questions regarding the submission of this form,contact the Department of State at (518) 474-6000. *These state and local documents are available for inspection at the offices of many federal agencies,Department of emironmental Conservation and Department of State regional offices,and the appropriate regional and county planning agencies. Local program documents are also available for inspection at the offices of the appropriate local government. NEW I'_ �irlrYl'ont of Office of OD;L :`tment M YT STAT i,-n ill nmentat General Services cif tat se nratili►n Us anm corm of tnglneersat .JOINT APPLICATION FORM For Permits for activities activities affecting streams,waterways,waterbodies, wetlands, coastal areas, sources of water, and endangered and threatened species. You must separately apply for and obtain Permits from each involved agency before starting work. Please read all instructions. 1. Applications To: >NYS Department of Environmental Conservation ® Check here to confirm you sent this form to NYSDEC. Check all permits that apply: ❑Dams and Impound- 0 Tidal Wetlands ❑ Water Withdrawal ❑ Stream Disturbance ment Structures ❑Wild, Scenic and ❑ Long Island Well ❑ Excavation and Fill in ❑401 Water Quality Recreational Rivers Navigable Waters Certification ❑ Incidental Take of ❑Coastal Erosion Endangered/ ❑X Docks, Moorings or ❑Freshwater Wetlands Management Threatened Species Platforms >US Army Corps of Engineers 0 Check here to confirm you sent this form to USACE. Check all permits that apply: ❑Section 404 Clean Water Act ❑X Section 10 Rivers and Harbors Act Is the project Federally funded? ❑ Yes R1 No If yes, name of Federal Agency: General Permit Type(s), if known: Preconstruction Notification: ❑Yes ❑ No >NYS Office of General Services ❑ Check here to confirm you sent this form to NYSOGS. Check all permits that apply: ❑ State Owned Lands Under Water ❑ Utility Easement(pipelines, conduits, cables,etc.) ❑ Docks, Moorings or Platforms F>NCheck YS Department of State ❑ Check here to confirm you sent this form to NYSDOS. if this applies: ® Coastal Consistency Concurrence 2. Name of Applicant Taxpayer ID if applicant is NOT an individual LCMG FINY,LLC Mailing Address Post Office/City State Zi 11888 SW Breyman Avenue Portland OR 97219 Telephone 503-819-7818 Email Applicant Must be(check all that apply): [ Owner ❑ Operator ❑ Lessee 3. Name of Property Owner if different than Applicant Mailing Address Post Office/City State Zi Telephone Email For Agency Use Only Agency c F ' k� �::.t�� Y APPlication Number. � - . _ p ; JOINT APPLICATION FORM 08/16 Page 1 of 4 JOW PLICATION FORM—Continued. Submit th'. mpleted page as part of your Application. 4. Name of Contact/Agent Docko, Inc. Keith B. Neilson, P.E. Mailing Address Post Office/City State Zi P.O.Box 421 Mystic LCT 06355 Telephone (860)572-8939 Email office docko.com 5. Project/Facility Name Property Tax Map Section/ Block/Lot Number: dock maintenance 1 1100072.-1-14-1 Project Street Address, if applicable Post Office/City State Zi 3773 Clay Point Road NY Fishers Island 06390 Provide directions and distances to roads, intersections, bridges and bodies of water Take the Fishers Island Ferry and leaving the terminal turn left onto Equestrian Ave.and then tum right onto Oriental Avenue. Tum left onto Clay Point Road. The house will be on your left. _ Town ❑ Village ❑ City County Stream/Waterbody Name Southhold I I Suffolk West Harbor Project Location Coordinates: Enter Latitude and Lon itude in degrees, minutes, seconds: 41 Latitude: ° 16 38 Longitude: 71 ° 59 36 6. Project Description: Provide the following information about your project.Continue each response and provide any additional information on other pages. Attach plans on separate pages. a. Purpose of the proposedproject: This project is to maintain longstanding wood crib supported pier with tie-off piles in support of recreational boating. b. Description of current site conditions: The site is a low coastal bluff along the east shore of West Harbor with a rocky,gravel beach lined with stone which is overgrown with bittersweet,various herbacious and small woody stem deciduous and coniferous trees with an access path from the pier to the house. c. Proposed site changes: There are no plannned changes to the site.The pier location and configuration will not change except for the maintenance wor and the change to pile supports. d. Type of structures and fill materials to be installed, and quantity of materials to be used(e.g.,square feet of covers e, cubic yards of fill material, structures below ordinary/mean high water, etc.): There is no fill to be placed in this project.The stone fill from the crib will be left on the seabed in accordance with pre- application coordination with the Director of the Marine Habitat Protection Bureau. e. Area of excavation or dredging,volume of material to be removed, location of dredged materialplacement: There is no excavation or dredging proposed at this site only the removal of deteriorated wood crib framing. f. Is tree cutting or clearing proposed? ❑ Yes If Yes, ex Iain below. I/V No Timing of the proposed cutting or clearing (month/year): Number of trees to be cut: Acreage of trees to be cleared: JOINT APPLICATION FORM 08116 Page 2 of 4 JOII; 'PLICATION FORM—Continued. Submit th,, mpleted pagms put of your Application. g. Work methods and type of equipment to be used: e contractor will ave to use a marine construction barge with a deck mounted crag toconduct maintenance work. i es wi be driven between the cribs at suitable intervals to support deck stringers,then the cig tubers will be removed.The barge mounted deck crane will also lift replacement timbers into position for connection wdtpow tools. h. Describe the planned sequence of activities: Mobilization will be followed by pile driving along side the existing pier. Pile pairs wilt*conected by split caps then deck stringers will be installed. Crib timbers will be removed progressively as pile pairs armon#eted to support the pier. i. Pollution control methods and other actions proposed to mitigate envirommtc�*m acts: There is no planned excavation or removal of sediments or stone from the sea bed ad dips will no longer be used to support the pier. The water depths are adequate to accomodate the marine construction bad ad pushboats without bottom contact. j. Erosion and silt control methods that will be used to prevent water ual' aft: ere are no foreseeable water quaff i y impacts with is project only pie driving,thimmix framing and decking and removal o old derteriorated timber crib framing. k. Alternatives considered to avoid regulated areas. If no feasible alternatives explain how the project will minimize impacts: ere are no real alternatives o occasional replacement of components on wood pikantumber piers. In early pre-app ica ion reviews of the project it was was agreed that removal of the crib timbers and replaceiefibith piles would be preferable. I. Proposed use: ® Private [-�Public ❑Commercial m.Proposed Start Date:I Permit reciept = Estimated Complefm ate: 12 months n. Has work begun onproject? ❑ Yes If Yes, explain below. 9NO o. Will project occupy Federal, State, or Municipal Land? 0 Yes If Yes m "'n below. 1.71Y No p. List any previous DEC, USACE, OGS or DOS Permit/Application numbeefotactivities at this location: Permit searches were requested from the USACOE,Town and State;none were food."maintenance permits for this pre-1968 structure have been applied for at the Town and the ACOE. q. Will this project require additional Federal, State,or Local authorizations,bduing zoning changes? 9 Yes If Yes, list below. ❑ No NYS DEC,NYSDOS and the Town of Southold Board of Trustees Maintenance pends. JOINT APPLICATION FORM 08116 Page 3 of 4 JOiNt'APPucATION FORM—Continued. Submit this completed page as part of your Application. 7. Signatures. Applicant and Owner(if different) must sign the application. Append additional pages of this Signature section if there are multiple Applicants, Owners or Contact/Agents. I hereby affirm that information provided on this form and all attachments submitted herewith is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. Permission to Inspect - I hereby consent to Agency inspection of the project site and adjacent property areas. Agency staff may enter the property without notice between 7:00 am and 7:00 pm, Monday- Friday. Inspection may occur without the owner, applicant or agent present. If the property is posted with "keep out"signs or fenced with an unlocked gate, Agency staff may still enter the property. Agency staff may take measurements, analyze site physical characteristics, take soil and vegetation samples, sketch and photograph the site. I understand that failure to give this consent may result in denial of the permit(s)sought by this application. False statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the NYS Penal Law. Further, the applicant accepts full responsibility for all damage, direct or indirect, of whatever nature, and by whomever suffered,arising out of the project described herein and agrees to indemnify and save harmless the State from suits, actions, damages and costs of every name and description resulting from said project. In addition, Federal Law, 18 U.S.C., Section 1001 provides for a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both where an applicant knowingly and willingly falsifies, conceals, or covers up a material fact; or knowingly makes or uses a false, fictitious or fraudulent statement. SignatyrR,pf Applicant Date auj 4"AI76 licant Must be (check All that apply): ® Owner E Operator ❑Lessee Printed Name Title Leslie O.Goss for LCMG FINY,LLC Co-Owner Signature of Owner if different than Applicant) Date Printed Name Title Si nat �e`ooff Contact/Agent Date Printed Name Title Keith B. Neilson, P.E. Agent -."` .' fr" For Agency Use Only DETERMINATION-OF NO PERMIT REQUIRED 'Agency Application Num6er . (Agency Name)has determined that No Permit is required from this Agency for the project described in this application. ' Agency Representative: Printed T'itie Name Signature Date JOINTAPPUCATION FORM 08116 Page 4 of 4 LCMG FINY,LLC FISHERS ISLAND SOUND FISHERS ISLAND,NEW YORK r NARRATIVE STATEMENT & SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR NYS DEC,NYS/DOS AND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATIONS August 2018 GENERAL LCMG FINY, LLC owns parcel 1000-2.-1-14.1 off Clay Point Road a private road, located along the west shore of Clay Point along Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island. The site is generally moderately sloped, sandy gravel soils, vegetated with grass, brush, landscaping ground cover and trees. The frontage of the property is approximately 400 feet along Fishers Island Sound at the east shore, abutted by the Mr. J Geddis Parsons property to the north and Rocky Ledge Partners, LLC to the south. The waterfront consists of a partially rock-covered beach with tidal wetlands vegetation at the base of the moderately sloped coastal bluff in the vicinity of the pier. It is LCMG FINY, LLC desire to maintain the existing fixed pier dock system but using driven wood piles to replace the deteriorated cribs. The pier will be at an end elevation of 6 feet above Mean Low Water(MLW), sloping upward and crossing over the boulder-strewn intertidal zone above the bottom sediments until reaching a finished elevation of about 10 feet to shore at that elevation, stopping short of the bank where it comes ashore with a ramped section of about 20 foot length which allows passage of the public on the rocky beach below; a rare event. Attached are application drawings prepared for this project showing this configuration and pertinent details. This supplemental narrative has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Town of Southold, Ordinance No. 6, 2004, and the Waterfront Revitalization Program related to docks and shorefront improvements. In addition, various coastal policies under the New York State Coastal Management Act are addressed herein for review by the New York State Department of State and Department of Environmental Conservation. This project is maintenance of a longstanding pier and dock facility. DESCRIPTION OF WORK As mentioned in the introductory paragraph, this project is to retain and maintain a fixed wood pile and timber pier changing the supports from cribs to piles along the shore out into Fishers Island Sound in accordance with existing guidelines set forth in the Town of Southold ordinance No. 6, 2004. It is envisioned that this structure will be built utilizing the following general sequence and methodology. ➢ The marine contractor will arrive by water with barge-mounted crane and push boats. ➢ The existing pier will be maintained, and all wood salvaged from the cribs for disposal in accordance with applicable laws,regulations and ordinances. ➢ New piles will be driven starting at the shore landing end of the pier and proceeding waterward at roughly 10-foot intervals to the waterward end of the pier. These piles will be driven by double-acting air hammer to a bearing capacity of 20 tons and pull-out resistance of approximately 10 tons. This generally requires about twelve to fifteen feet of embedment of the pile in the bearing stratum. Because of the exposure with the prevailing wind westerly 1 wave field, these piles will be 12-inch nominal diameter class B Southern Yellow Pine pressure treated to 2.5 pcf of CCA Type C. ➢ After the piles are installed, split caps (also referred to as split clamps) consisting of a pair of pressure treated Southern Pine timbers, 4 x 10 to 4 x 12 nominal dimension, will be bolted to the piles transversely forming a pile bent. Stringers will be then laid on the split caps parallel to the length of the pier. In all likelihood, five runs of stringers will be set and will probably consist of 3 x 10 pressure-treated Southern Pine. ➢ The outer stringer on each side will be bolted or spiked to the pile to secure it against wave uplift forces that this pier might be exposed to. ➢ After the stringers have been connected to the piles and split caps, the decking will be installed. In accordance with Town of Southold's Ordinance No. 6, 2004,this decking will not be CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine but rather oak, cedar hardwood or plastic/ composite such as "Timber Tech" or similar synthetic, composite or plastic material.with the brushed side mounted up. If composites or plastic are used, it will be either gray, brown or natural in color. Decking will be attached to the stringers utilizing galvanized nails or stainless-steel Phillips or flathead square-drive wood screws about 3 inches long and will be set with a '/" gap between deck planks. ➢ The over-water decking will run level at a height of up to eight feet above the existing bottom sediments in the shallow subtidal zone. See Sheet 4 of the application drawings for the pier profile. ➢ The piles will be about 42 inches above the deck surface and support horizontal rail members. ➢ The mid-rail can be timber or cable and both details are shown. ➢ A top rail of cedar, oak,hardwood or Timber Tech material will be installed for safety. ➢ Water and electricity will be run out on the pier in the space between the stringers so that trickle chargers on the boat may be powered during tie-ups. The water will allow boats to be rinsed off after usage. A power post with an internal light will be mounted to the end of the fixed pier with receptacles to provide power to the boats from extension cords. The power post will also have coiling arms for storage of the electric service cord and hose between uses. Because the dock may be used during the hours of darkness, low-intensity lights will be mounted on staggered piles or dock rail posts to illuminate the deck and the walking surface up the bank. This system will be manually, or radio controlled with a shut-off timer so that the lights will only be on when necessary for safety of the users. LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION POLICIES The Town of Southold, LWRP policies that are applicable to the dock proposal are a local refinement of the Long Island Sound Regional Coastal Management Program policies that apply throughout Long Island Sound. The Goss site is off Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island and is characterized predominately as undeveloped coast or natural coast. The undeveloped coast policies are applicable as follows: ➢ Policy 1 is to foster a pattern of development that enhances community character and preserves natural resources to the maximum extent and minimises adverse impacts on the environment, ➢ Policy 2 is to preserve historic resources, ➢ Policy 3 is to enhance and protect scenic resources and visual quality. The pier maintenance and crib removal for LCMG FINY, LLC is consistent with waterfront development on Fishers Island and in coastal areas. The pier is made of suitably-sized timbers and utilizes the materials allowable under Local Law #6 with due consideration of climatic conditions at the site and replacement components will conform as well. This proposal is consistent with other 2 adjacent dOCK facilities and characteristics for the visual and scenic considerations. The encroachment is not significant, to be consistent with DEC policies, Southold Local Law #6, US ACOE policies and the structure is as low profile as possible, consistent with the safe and efficient use of the waters and consistent with the tidal and wave exposure of this site. Lighting will be minimal for operational safety and otherwise off, and lights will be utilized only when necessary for boating purposes so that during hours of darkness there will be no adverse impact NATURAL COAST POLICIES The Natural Coastal Policies are 4 through 8 and require consideration as follows: ➢ Policy 4—Minimize loss of life, structures and natural resources from flooding and erosion, ➢ Policy 5 —Protect and improve water quality ➢ Policy 6—Protect and restore the quality and function of the eco-system, ➢ Policy 7—Protect and improve air quality; ➢ Policy 8 - Minimize environmental degradation primarily from solid waste and hazardous substances. The pier maintenance crib removal for LCMG FINY, LLC recreational boating facility has been laid out and configured so as to be the same footprint as the pier which has been here for decades, consistent with the DEC permit requirements for such structures and in accordance with recommendations of the Marine Habitat Protection Bureau offered during the workshop pre- application. There was no tidal wetlands vegetation on the beach where the pier begins. The pier has been configured high, over submerged aquatic vegetation which has grown around the pier in the shallow subtidal waters. As such, it provides adequate height to clear environmental resources of concern and the materials to be utilized are consistent with Town of Southold's Local Law #6 regarding environmental quality and the use of pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine timber components in particular. Pier maintenance work will have no adverse impacts on air quality as a result of this structure and the work on the dock should not diminish overall environmental considerations in Fishers Island Sound. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9 sets forth a priority to provide for public access and recreational use of coastal waters, public lands and public resources of the Town. This project maintains a longstanding (decades old) recreational boating facility for the LCMG FINY, LLC property and so is consistent with this policy. WORKING COAST POLICIES The policies of this section relate to the following: ➢ Policy 10 — Protection of the Town's water-dependent uses and promoting new water- dependent uses in suitable locations, ➢ Policy 11 —Promoting sustainable use of living marine resources, ➢ Policy 12—Protect agricultural lands, ➢ Policy 13 —Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. While most of the Working Coast Policies are not applicable to this site or this type of project, Policy 10, promoting water-dependent uses and the siting of water-dependent uses in appropriate areas is applicable. The proposed maintenance project makes the most beneficial use of the land and keeping the dock facility in the most appropriate, historic point of the land where access down the 3 bank will not require changes in structural facilities and can be accommodated with path work rather than formal stairs and so on. This project has been laid out with specific reference and review of the Waterfront Revitalization Program policies and is considered to be consistent. In summary, the dock is typical of recreational boating facilities throughout the area and all along coastal New England. The pier structure maintains the same length, width,height, and structure so as to be consistent with other facilities of a similar nature and the minimum necessary components to accommodate safe and efficient boating operations from this site safely in a variety of climatic conditions. Pile supports will be utilized instead of cribs and old crib timbers will be removed leaving the stone on the bottom for habitat diversity. This project does not interfere with public access or use of public trust waters and lands of the State, it does not interfere with navigation, it will not create soil or sedimentation erosion problems, it does not adversely environmental resources and in the area where the facility must span the intertidal zone at the shore line, the facility will be maintained in the area of rocks where environmental resources have already acclimated to the pier and boating activity so as not to worsen any of these conditions. The height of the structure has been specifically addressed so as to maintain clearance above the shoreline tidal wetlands plants if other conditions are conducive to such growth. The dock facility maintenance reach out to 4 feet of water in Fisher Island Sound so that dredging will not be an issue in the future, thus fiuther minimizing adverse environmental impacts. More than 95% of the LCMG FINY, LLC shoreline will remain in a natural state as a result of these considerations for design. There is no loss of valuable marine and wetland habitat and no water quality degradation as a result of this project. No natural protective features or processes will be adversely impacted as a result of the maintenance work on the docking facility. Dense growth areas of submerged aquatic vegetation in the proposed dock or berthing area have been avoided. Reference is made to the NYS DEC study from 2000 indicating the suitability of pressure- treated Southern Yellow Pine piles and super-structure components for this type of purpose. The piles must be 12-inch diameter due to site exposure. In accordance with Local Law#6, decking for the pier and the approach ramp will be of woods other than Southern Yellow Pine or plastic. This project is consistent with zoning policies and ordinances for the Town. The dock facility will be an accessory to the home located at this site. There will be no development of the upland related to this dock facility that will create point sources of pollution or drainage. This project is providing recreational boating and water usage opportunities compatible with the natural resource values and characteristics of the site. The dock is existing sized for stability considerations especially acknowledging that waves from the north can come in from Fishers Island Sound and the dock is angled more or less into those waves. REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 97-25 OF THE WETLANDS LAW 6,2004 The permittee acknowledges that the validity of this permit is subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. The permittee does, by the acceptance of this permit, assume all responsibility for operations undertaken pursuant to this permit, and shall take all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property resulting from such operations. By such acceptance, the permittee also agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Town and its officers. The permittee gives consent to the Town and its officers, employees and agents to enter upon the premises where such operations are being conducted to make such inspections to determine whether said operations are being conducted in conformity with the permit. 4 The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing one week prior to initiation of any and all operations. l The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing upon completion of operations such that the site can be inspected for issuance for a certificate of compliance. In response to Sub-section 2a and the General Rules for Standards of Residential and Commercial Docks, the following additional information is offered. 1. Permits for the work are being applied for through the Town, US ACOE, NYS DEC and a coastal zone consistency determination by the NYS DOS. 2. The new piles to be installed will be of sturdy, durable and stable materials; in all likelihood, Greenhart, Kakaralli or CCA Type C pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine (SYP) 12-inch diameter class B piles with new split caps and braces of pressure-treated SYP materials. These members will be a minimum of 3 x 8's and more often, 3 x 10's and 4 x 10's with at least one 1-inch bolt per connection, and in other cases, two 3/ inch bolts per connection. ` This pier is a fixed, pile-supported timber structure and therefore will not adversely affect the free circulation of water or reduce the effects of fluctuating water levels in Fishers Island Sound or West Harbor. In addition,the pier does not present any adverse modification of the shoreline. The pier's end elevation is such that in extreme high flood tides the structure will be inundated. The structure's SYP timber materials represent the standard of the industry being specifically grown a renewable resource for this type of usage and are capable of withstanding full immersion. With the connections described above, this structure will be able to survive repeated inundations and even direct waves at high tide elevations with a structural life of approximately 20 years. 3. The pier support will include driving new 12-inch diameter piles at 10-foot intervals to the maximum extent possible in order to obtain the desired pier alignment and support intervals. The pier is situated toward the northerly line of West Harbor, however this part of the shoreline would be more accurately characterized as Fishers Island Sound from the wave exposure design perspective. While Southold Local Law 6 dictates smaller piles sizes, such piles would be inadequate in this location. Waves of 2 to 3 feet are not uncommon at this site, hence the ravaged shoreline features. Clay Point extends out to the north beyond Osprey Point on the west edge of West Harbor. Waves from Long Island Sound can be influenced by a fetch of a hundred miles. These waves can defract and refract around North Hill and come right at this site. The piles proposed for this project will need to be 12-inch Class B piles with 8-inch tips in order to withstand the sea conditions and driving conditions. The use of CCA pressure-treated timbers and Class B 12-inch piles can thus be approved for this project in accordance with Local Law 6. 4. The pier will not be decked with CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine. This pier/ walkway provides a safe pedestrian surface for access to the berthed boat. Rails shown to may be installed on the pier for safety. 5 5. "i he pier is located near the center of ine property line. The 15-foot clearance specified in this paragraph has been honored and should not be an issue because the proposed pier does not represent a significant encroachment into the boating operation area of the property'to the south or to the north nor does it project into the navigation way for other boaters in the Harbor. 6. Upon receipt of the permit for this project, appropriate permit numbers and a Town permit placard will be affixed to the most seaward face of the pier for identification from the water. 7. There are no permanent structures located above the pier decking, nor are any planned at this time, other than the power post and railing which are fixed by function. 8. It is currently possible to provide a five-foot passage way beneath this pier and that access ability will be retained landward of the apparent high-water line. There is only minimal room to walk under the pier at high tide, however, foot traffic in this area is rare, if at all and so the additional structure of an up and over stairway has been left out of this pier layout. NEW YORK STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM These application documents include a copy of the Federal Consistency Assessment Form utilized for the New York State Coastal'Management Program under the jurisdiction of the New York State Department of State. The following policies have been identified as pertinent to this application and the reason for consistency associated with this project is outlined in each respective case. Policy2 Water Dependent Uses—This project is to maintain a fully functional water dependent use, a recreational boating dock facility at this site in support of recreational boating. Policy 5 —Use of Existing Developed Shorefront—There is no developed shoreline on this site. This project utilizes natural existing shorefront which is dominated by an accumulation of stone which has abundant vegetative resources such as bittersweet, poison ivy and junipers with only sporadic patches of tidal wetlands vegetation or individual plants. The project will be to rebuild the pier and remove crib timbers to the existing shoreward terminus to make it safe and reliably usable in most weather conditions without impeding shoreline public access. Policy 7 — Significant Fish & Wildlife Habitat—Protection of significant fish and wildlife habitat has been considered in the development of this project layout. The pier, to the shoreward point of beginning, has avoided the shoreline spartina patches and runs 4 to 5 feet above the rocky intertidal sediments and should not jeopardize the health of any shoreline vegetation. Typically, there is a slight environmental benefit to a pier project because of the creation of structure in the water column where barnacles, algae and crustaceans will colonize and grow. The alignment of the pier remains as is so as not to adversely affect the eel grass fringe strip that follows the 3 to 4 contours around the existing pier. Poligy 8 —Protection & Preservation of Habitat—Protection and preservation of habitat has also been considered in this project and the dock structure is being kept to its longstanding configuration and of materials consistent with standards of the industry and restrictions set forth in the Wetlands Law, No. 6, 2004 set forth by the Town of Southold and standards of the NYS DEC. The pier point of origin will remain over a stony part of the beach to make use of the least habitat and minimize damage to natural resources. 6 Policy 11 —Minimize Damage to Natural Resources - The dock construction project has been laid out in such a way so as to minimize damage or impact to natural resources as identified in Policy 7 above. The dock facility will remain in its longstanding location where stone on the beach has already impacted shoreline vegetation and the length is the minimum practical length for the slip to reach 4 feet of water depth at MLW. Policy 14 — No Measurable Increase in Flooding= This project consists of construction of an open wood pile and timber pier which in no way adversely affects waterflow and circulation in West Harbor or Fishers Island Sound or flooding potential of the area. Flood levels all around Fishers Island are dictated by water levels in Long Island Sound, Fishers Island Sound and Block Island Sound and this structure will have no adverse influence or in any way impact on those levels. Policy 15 —No Dredging—Dredging is not required in this project. The dock will be maintained out in its current location and configuration to avoid any dredging requirements. The depth of 4 feet, as generally recommended by the NYS DEC and US ACOE, has been reached. The waters are not protected enough that boats can be berthed bow to shore but rather bow out in the deeper water. The boat will not ground out at low tide. Policy 19 —Impact on Public Access—Public access will not be jeopardized or impeded as a result of this project. As a matter of fact, there is almost no public access usage of the public trust lands or waters at this site except kayaking and canoeing and that is rare. The intertidal zone is significantly covered by stone and boulders and that is common on adjacent properties. The shallow sub-tidal waters do not present any opportunity or enticement for public access in the area. The pier stops well short of the landward 25% of the waterway width in accordance with US ACOE policies. West Harbor is more that a mile wide at this point. Thus, public access to the State's lands and waters will not be adversely affected by the project. Policy 20 — Public Trust Compatibility with Existing Adjoining Properties and Land Uses- Public Trust compatibility with existing adjoining properties and land uses have also been considered in this project. Several nearby properties have docking facilities similar to this one and this docking facility will not interfere with existing or the likely configuration of future facilities on immediately adjoining properties or the logical allocation of littoral development rights. Policy 21 —Water Dependent Recreation—This project is consistent with water-dependent recreational opportunities policies set forth in this section. Policy 24 —Scenic Resources, Impairment or Loss - This policy is designed to prevent impairment or loss of scenic resources. The length, height and width of the fixed wood pile and timber pier will not represent such an extent of encroachment or structure which would create a loss of scenic resources on adjacent or nearby properties or views from the water. Policy 25 — Enhance Overall Scenic Quality - The maintained dock structure will be consistent with the scenic quality of the area and prevent loss of scenic resources as described in Policy 24 above. Policy44 — Preserve and Protect Tidal Wetlands — It is acknowledged that the spartina alterna flora exists sporadically in very small patches along the shorefront. The maintenance of the fixed wood pile and timber pier will take advantage of the un-vegetated strip of the shoreline caused by the longstanding pier landing over stone in order to avoid adverse wetlands vegetation impact. The height of the pier should allow opportunities for the growth of the spartina fringe marsh naturally up to, and to an extent,beneath the wood pier if other conditions are suitable, and the same with submerged aquatic vegetation. 7 i SUMMARY This project is for pier maintenance for recreational boating access at property of the LCMG FINY, LLC on Fishers Island. A copy of all US Army Corps of Engineers, NYS DEC and Town of Southold applications are attached as substantiation for this project. This project complies with applicable standards of the New York State Coastal Management Act, NYS / DEC Tidal Wetland Regulations and criteria for approval, the Town of Southold Waterfront Revitalization Program and Local Ordinance No. 6, 2004 and its approval is thus respectfully requested. Respectfully submitted, DOCKO, INC. 4- &J�J Keith B.Neilson, P.E. 8 _ r � .r�',-���-��'�},,,i�Jnr-'+,,. - •--�� �;^r"'�'•"�—:a,,. x.": _ .=� •�' 3�r � ,�� �,a,�+i�a4. Y a '��3� .ori k � _`- J 3 r? 1 S y i Ask TAX ASSESSOR'S 1000-2.1-14.1 PROJECT: "DOCK MAINTENANCE" WATERWAY: FISHERS ISLAND SOUND LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK APPLICANT: LCMG FI Y,LLC AGENT: DOCKO,INC. FISHERS ISLAND SOUND . -0r x e x M ERR 6 t•' ry1 2 �. 11.3 S.OA p�Q. 3.2A 3.1AFcl w - S.2 O 119A 1.SA •2�•16 n ]b n •^� /�O• P�' * fp a r^LpOYa � •J 7.3 hr 3.2Atc1 ff]r �� •J` lA ; s \I 9.1A 9 S�11.1 2.8A 3.6A(c) r y 12 7.4 2.SA O s 3.4A 8.1 ti LSA :a RV7, Y33.3a r pow B.2 +E 7.� m ,u L7A 4.2A st ff0 � a` c 14.1 . 16.3 17 rb rr0, S.lA ; 4.BA 16.1 is L.BA - 2.2Afc1 i >c7 'f QQ. � 15.2 1.5A --AC — „o-P.+.,..,_.L. --•-- "LESS r-_.N CT-ER.SE. ILL . oEPfES NOTICE arf COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © E 10 TRE .IT4-N TSE GOLLOIIWG OSTRICTS, y�" r —-c—- P-1-0111""Lti —-R—- SC�OCL HIS__t.] 4A,NTENANCE,ALTEPA-.J SALE 0- ��° Real Property Tax Service Agency Y _f—- vaktlCffrlc.If•. —.lif - FP 77 -TORAVT_ CS MBU7NN OF ANY PC;IIJN OF TSE 4 County Center Riverheod,N Y 11901 -A—- LIC41 REFUSE !, SVFOLR COUNTY 1.7 VA.'S P-r'15 T:O �o SCALE e.FEE, A .15fEYATTI 1+TPOUT 1PITEN PEAVISS10 OF reE � $�$ a] a 7='7 .a P ]ER.r PEAL PFOPEPTY TAA SERVICE A:E\_' 30 ___� HELY LONOQN-B[OCK/SL,gN6FERtW i LOCATION MAP ` PROJECT: "NEW PIER AND FLOAT" - _ WATERWAY: FISHERS ISLAND SOUND ---------------_--- _ - 45 i LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD T SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK s3 GOIA ' g1� ' APPLICANT: DONALD YOUNG a/1yEw AGENT: DOCKO,INC. 67 y --7?` 7 53 ' 35 r-60— IS' f\\ \ °• GG '; -;$F• wens- _.- `` ,•'�) =�-�f --.x ,,\ 42 ---- l So' f11*af- *\Clump P�d=�`\ _- - - " 1•,\ , , ; .��• `__' �; i'. ,` *�1i i •• �` '-78.`s_ 17. *iL �E Rock I a '•\ l�•(\ Ij 1 * �. lands _12" ':().� 'ice / 27 B F�o -)(• * � i(-� *, L"L4nr�9ry .6., \.Eas o \- Pmt Harb ' Fou Cra x-72— - d* 1 J ,�r.'' i�1 ._-'�i\i.�j�^ �x i� �1� '•i O l (, ��`J �y�-'1_.a.i f,`�\1 i� ri�C /� •� L•� ^q�`. (//��Ir 1 �Ir �\�' ��= 'ti. _J,50��` _{l\QJ:.\'.` 'roo` i1';\ -JL _ �a.--.f,f, r`.i4 t L — y /fir., -:� �w 110' _`,` .�.• _/: O` ! :�, ; •_;v'• F4j y i —`� p w: ^Jv."` ;�) \tom S\' � 7 �i �} ii\\\ ` '•fit * . 1 L`-= \\ ,ju�'„��'-_ AC.� yL,V (/�� ` �p\ .n�i•. r II �• `_ ? _ -� \'ISS 1t it�i�� u` S I�\�`>�J r,) \ i _ ( ... 1 {� N6 * , / `� �;-. l;-y-_a, — ...� n,ur�,(. ,• J �a�L�' ��it -\r�xr:��� �-.' • '•e -._, - r,�`?�-. o* .�j (^ ( "�= •�, .� -art.+ ,, 00. �•� rr' ' oar t 0� ey P st 48 Ida) /• FI t`r 'kif• / r' 9•r ``. \,�eaR�_'•" ��l r•r� �i �3gi _' /,, IXA ' /� e 46 _ PG nd yu •� U / 79 , � r Vil tT -I i moo•! 25 Ii 57 _ ' 96 131 ' 1 , - I • - - j Goo gte:earth e zGi cooglo .� 1356 6 `L ,.._.. _ 'ln.7n"II 71'59'37.0 i"W 11oye A 153711 C T,w,jjry Date:10!10!7016 41-16 ::';.lour Gtidc 1997 *114 .. �.. �t s i � � � �'�y h ,Ly r 'T"7 ."Jt,#+`.��.•�" x•t. r 4 �r �k zNit 'r.'� i•�3. •k- t+ ^'' f - 'fY •` i;�Rs E .•� 'E�.i.; yrwa'y."' '}- ,lig. !. t ;»s .FL'9.` '�'�' •- M a` '+•{ } S� i t !FY y-$_�1 �v`�' ",f _ _r�f. •. t2-'i$ _ � y� 'r �y - - t Yi l; .11'1 t YK � F1R R t O, l 74 My AM- v .�•Liq'q. .E.4.` �'^�]•>7"ir '�=.i.it .0 en �S1 Y _ ..� � "_ 5 r ; r �K; ��r•�, C`�,.� y �� si {rt "1,E,,. ,'k 4"I � S ,..fit tn Mrd .,.+ s •{ 'ms's^ a}xE .JS'" s"�2 Vt �a�r., ^sfs."r.� ,�.a",':ta'+ �7.' •^...�.�. ..K .:s- N.:.E,9? al ..._+ 1•�.. _ Jr. ®ocko Inc. ! Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421, Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:office@docko.cC,,- September 13, 2018 NYS DEC Environmental Permits Building 40, SUNY Stony Brook,NY 11790-2356 Re: LCMG FINY, LLC Property, Fishers Island To Whom It May Concern: Dock Maintenance On behalf of LCMG FINY, LLC, we request a Tidal Wetlands Permit including Water Quality Certifications, as necessary, for dock maintenance in Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island, New York. We enclose the following in support of this permit application: ❖ Four prints each of plans titled: Project: "Dock Maintenance" Waterway: Fishers Island Sound Location: Fishers Island, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York Applicant: LCMG FINY, LLC Agent: Docko, Inc. ❖ Four copies of the NYS DEC and USACOE Joint Application, including the Short Environmental Assessment Form, Full Environmental Assessment Form (SEQR Part 1), EFH Worksheet, Permission, to Inspect Form, Narrative, Location Map, Tax Assessor's Map, and Photographs. ❖ Two copies of the Property Survey ❖ One copy of each application submitted to the USACOE and NYS DOS ❖ One check in the amount of$200 made payable to the NYS DEC. I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable; please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, DO KO, INC. C KBN: cb Keith B.Neilson, P.E. Enclosure CC: Ms. Leslie Goss USACOE NYS DOS File: 17-09-2876 GOSS �-q- v'T Al4d fit ' ff C.@Lf, !' N, ATS t l�l't?Titi1@t1t ', ts�t1@I a#'!lltaiC :Dfs" _. Ct it: w~ry tion as A"" of englq JOINTAPPLICATION FORM For Permits for activities activities affecting streams,waterways,waterbodies,wetlands, coastal areas, sources of water, and endangered and threatened species. You must separately apply for and obtain Permits from each involved agency before starting work. Please read all instructions. 1. Applications To: >NYS Department of Environmental Conservation ® Check here to confirm you sent this form to NYSDEC. Check all permits that apply: F–]Dams and Impound- [—)<]Tidal Wetlands ❑ Water Withdrawal ❑ Stream Disturbance ment Structures ❑Wild, Scenic and ❑ Long Island Well ❑ Excavation and Fill in ❑401 Water Quality Recreational Rivers ❑ Incidental Take of Navigable Waters Certification ❑Coastal Erosion Endangered/ © Docks, Moorings or ❑Freshwater Wetlands Management Threatened Species Platforms >US Army Corps of Engineers 5R]",Che6k,here toyconfrrri°you sent this fomi`to USACE:«: ;:;' Check all permits that apply: ❑Section 404 Clean Water Act ❑X Section 10 Rivers and Harbors Act Is the project Federally funded? ❑ Yes rZ No If yes, name of Federal Agency: General Permit Type(s), if known: Preconstruction Notification: ❑Yes ❑ No >NYS Office of General Services ❑1' h'eck;tiere to conf�m you sentjhiis.form;to°NYSOGS':- Check all permits that apply: ❑ State Owned Lands Under Water ❑ Utility Easement(pipelines, conduits, cables, etc.) ❑ Docks, Moorings or Platforms >NYS Department of State ❑'Ch'eck-Here to.confirm you',sent this form to'NYSDOS.; ,' Check if this applies: ❑X Coastal Consistency Concurrence 2. Name of Applicant Taxpa er ID if applicant is NOT an individual LCMG FINY, LLC Mailing Address Post Office/City State Zi 11888 SW Breyman Avenue Portland OR 97219 Telephone 503-819-7818 Email Applicant Must be (check all that apply): �Owner, ❑ Operator E] Lessee 3. Name of Property Owner if different than Applicant Mailing Address Post Office/City State Zi I L Telephone Email a,<>'�s.'t '� '" �'.,'�yo-izgza �,;x,'�,�,:,t',3'k::Nl•.wr:tS:{;.�,; 5�i For Agencv Use Only Agency Application Number." rye' R M, > <f.,• 7 Tm•1. sU.d: :S 1. rta +,?.='." ..""€•:.,s-�`' '.ra 2'�'w'{'S' sr§1�•'c JOINT APPLICATION FORM 08/16 Page 1 of 4 ti 4 JOINT fi CATION FORM—Continued. Submit this c eted page as part of your Application. 4. Name of Contact/Agent Docko, Inc. Keith B.Neilson, P.E. Mailing Address Post Office/City State Zi P.O.Box 421 Mystic LC TJ 06355 Telephone (860)572-8939 Email office@docko.com 5. Project/Facility Name Property Tax Map Section/ Block/Lot Number: dock maintenance 1 11000-2.-1-14-1 Project Street Address, if applicable Post Office/City State Zi 3773 Clay Point RoadNY Fishers Island 06390 Provide directions and distances to roads, intersections, bridges and bodies of water Take the Fishers Island Ferry and leaving the terminal turn left onto Equestrian Ave.and then turn right onto Oriental Avenue. Tum left onto Clay Point Road. The house will be on your left. Town Village 0 City County StreamNVaterbody Name Southhold I I Suffolk West Harbor Project Location Coordinates: Enter Latitudeand Lon itude in degrees, minutes, seconds: Latitude: 41 [j:=' 38 Longitude: 71 ° 59 36 6. Project Description: Provide the following information about your project. Continue each response and provide any additional information on other pages. Attach plans on separate pages. a. Purpose of the proposedproject: This project is to maintain longstanding wood crib supported pier with tie-off piles in support of recreational boating. b. Description of current site conditions: The site is a low coastal bluff along the east shore of West Harbor with a rocky,gravel beach lined with stone which is overgrown with bittersweet,various herbacious and small woody stem deciduous and coniferous trees with an access path from the pier to the house. C. Proposed site changes: There are no plannned changes to the site.The pier location and configuration will not change except for the maintenance wor and the change to pile supports. d. Type of structures and fill materials to be installed, and quantity of materials to be used (e.g., square feet of coverage, cubic Vards of fill material, structures below ordinary/mean high water, etc.): There is no fill to be placed in this project.The stone fill from the crib will be left on the seabed in accordance with pre- application coordination with the Director of the Marine Habitat Protection Bureau. e. Area of excavation or dredging, volume of material to be removed, location of dredged materialplacement: There is no excavation or dredging proposed at this site only the removal of deteriorated wood crib framing. f. Is tree cutting or clearing proposed? ❑ Yes If Yes, explain below. 19 No Timing of the proposed cutting or clearing (month/year): Number of trees to be cut: Acreage of trees to be cleared: JOINT APPLICATION FORM 08/16 Page 2 of 4 JOINT _ICATION FORM—Continued. Submit this pleted page as part of your Application. g. Work methods and type of equipment to be used: e con rac or will ave to use a marine construction barge with a deck mounted crane to conduct maintenance work. Piles will be driven between the cribs at suitable intervals to support deck stringers,then the crib timbers will be removed.The barge mounted deck crane will also lift replacement timbers into position for connection with power tools. h. Describe the planned sequence of activities: Mobilization will be followed by pile driving along side the existing pier. Pile pairs will be connected by split caps then deck stringers will be installed.Crib timbers will be removed progressively as pile pairs are completed to support the pier. i. Pollution control methods and other actions proposed to mitigate environmental impacts: There is no planned excavation or removal of sediments or stone from the sea bed and cribs will no longer be used to support the pier. The water depths are adequate to accomodate the marine construction barge and pushboats without bottom contact. j. Erosion and silt control methods that will be used to prevent water quality impacts: There are no foreseeable water quaility impacts with is project only pie driving,the timber framing and decking and removal o old derteriorated timber crib framing. k. Alternatives considered to avoid regulated areas. If no feasible alternatives exist, explain how the project will minimize impacts: ere are no real alternatives o occasional replacement of components on wood pie and timber piers. in early pre-application reviews of the project it was was agreed that removal of the crib timbers and replacement with piles would be preferable. I. Proposed use: ] Private Public ❑Commercial m.Proposed Start Date:I Permit reciept Estimated Completion Date: 12 months n. Has work begun on project? E-1YesIf Yes, explain below. � No o. Will project occupy Federal, State, or Municipal Land? Yes If Yes, explain below. 1/y No p. List any previous DEC, USACE, OGS or DOS Permit/Application numbers for activities at this location: Permit searches were requested from the USACOE,Town and State;none were found. Maintenance permits for this pre-1968 structure have been applied for at the Town and the ACOE. q. Will this project require additional Federal, State,or Local authorizations, including zoning changes? 0 Yes If Yes, list below. ❑ No NYS DEC, NYSDOS and the Town of Southold Board of Trustees Maintenance permits. JOINT APPLICATION FORM 08/16 Page 3 of 4 t t l JOINT APPLICATION FORM—Continued. Submit this completed page as part of your Application. 7. Signatures. Applicant and Owner(If different)must sign the application. Append additional pages of this Signature section if there are multiple Applicants, Owners or Contact/Agents. 1 hereby affirm that information provided on this form and all attachments submitted herewith is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. Permission to Inspect- 1 hereby consent to Agency inspection of the project site and adjacent property areas. Agency staff may enter the property without notice between 7:00 am and 7:00 pm, Monday- Friday. Inspection may occur without the owner,applicant or agent present. If the property is posted with"keep out"signs or fenced with an unlocked gate, Agency staff may still enter the property,Agency staff may take measurements, analyze site physical characteristics,take soil and vegetation samples,sketch and photograph the site. I understand that failure to give this consent may result in denial of the permit(s)sought by this application. False statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the NYS Penal Law. Further, the applicant accepts full responsibility for all damage,direct or indirect,of whatever nature, and by whomever suffered,arising out of the project described herein and agrees to indemnify and save harmless the State from suits, actions, damages and costs of every name and description resulting from said project. In addition, Federal Law, 18 U.S.C., Section 1001 provides for a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both where an applicant knowingly and willingly falsifies, conceals, or covers up a material fact;or knowingly makes or uses a false, fictitious or fraudulent statement. Si nat f Applicant Date '--A �IicaJMust be (check 'II that apply): ] Owner ( ,'Operator Lessee Printed Name Title Leslie 0.Goss for LCMG FINY,LLC Co-Owner Si nature of Owner if different than Applicant) Date C � Printed Name Title Signature of Contact I Agent Date Printed Name Title Keith B.Neilson,P.E. Agent For Agency Use Only DETERMINATION OF NO PERMIT REQUIRED Agency Application Number (Agency Name)has determined that No Permit is required from this Agency for the project described in this application.'",- Agency pplication.`,Agency Representative: PrintedTitle1 Name 7 71 Signature Date JOINT APPLICATION FORM 08116 Pa-e 4 Of 4 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 -Project Information Instructions for Completins Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information LCMG FINY,LLC Name of Action or Project: Dock Reconstruction Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 3773 Clay Point Road Brief Description of Proposed Action: The proposed project is to maintain 151(+/-)LF of existing 8-FT wide fixed wood pier,of which 1202(+/-)LF is waterward of the AHWL,including the installation of 32 new support piles,maintain the landward most stone filled timber pier support crib and remove the outermost 4 support crib timbers. Replace 3 tie-off piles and install 1 new tie-off pile,all at and waterward of the Apparent High Tide Line in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: (503)819-7818 LCMG FINY,LLC E-Mail: Address: 11888 SW Breyman Avenue City/PO: State: Zip Code: Portland OR 97219 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: ElNYSDOS,LISACOE,NYSDEC,Town of Southold 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 1.09 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? n1 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 1.09 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban 10 Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial IRResidential(suburban) (Forest ❑Agriculture 5aAquatic ❑Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 3 5. Is the proposes action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ ® ❑ b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? 1 ® ❑ 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? ❑ M 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify:There is eel grass growin-g around the existing pier as shown in the application Eldrawings/surveys. 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES ® ❑ b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? ❑ c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? ❑ 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: ❑ This project will not have significant energy demands even with electric utilities and lights. 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: ❑ A water line(conduit)maybe run out the pier. LOMJ 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ❑ No water treatment, none required. 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? ❑ b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ❑ 9 b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? D If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: The exising longstanding.crib supported wood timber per has existed at this site since the 1950's and will be maintained in its current length width,and height or usage. 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: W Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands El Early mid-successional Wetland ❑Urban 12 Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered?There is eel grass growing along in a band along the shore and around the pier ❑ 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES Yes,the dock is in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, ® D a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑NO DYES b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: D NO DYES Page 2 of 3 14 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: 2 ❑ 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: ® ❑ I AFFIRM TiIAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE p Applicant/spon name: LC71G N LLC L j 0$S Date: OC 6ber 2 zd1U Signature: Page 3 of 3 r , + � 617.20,, Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a projector action may be significant. The question of whether Ian action maybe significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. Thefull EAFis intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluatewhether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE-- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ®Part 1 17 Part 2 ®Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: K7A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ®B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Actior1 because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* 17C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Dock Maintenance Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) w ebsite Date PART 1--PROJECT INA- IATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Dock Maintenance Location of Action(include Street Address, Municipality and County) 3773 Clay Point Road,Fishers Island, NY Name of Applicant/Sponsor LCMG FINY, LLC Address 11888 SW Breyman Avenue City/PO Portland State OR Zip Code 97219 , Business Telephone (503)819-7818 Name of Owner(if different) Address City/PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: The proposed project is to maintain 151(+/-)LF of existing 8-FT wide fixed wood pier,of which 120(+/-)LF,is waterward of the AHWL, including the installation of 32 new pier support piles,maintain the landward most stone filled timber pier support crib,and remove the outermost 4 support crib timbers. Replace 3 tie-off piles and install 1 new tie-off piled,all at and waterward of the Apparent High Tide line in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. L T Please Complete E__,,<<i Question--Indicate N.A. if not a ;icable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. I. Present Land Use:❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial R Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ®Other Coastal Shoreline 2. Total acreage of project area: 0.03 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0.5 acres 0.5 acres Forested 0.6 acres 0.6 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Gravel a. Soil drainage: Well drained 100% of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site. ❑Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑ Yes No a. What is depth to bedrock 8n (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: MO-1 0% % ❑10- 15% % ❑ 15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially-contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? I Yes No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes RNo 8. What is the depth of the water table? 10(in feet) g. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes ® No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ®Yes �No 11?Does project site coi any species of plant or animal life that is ici ped as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes ®No According to: Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? ❑Yes ®No Describe: The site is a wooded lot with an open meadow in the middle.The shoreline is a coastal bluff, heavily vegetated with a moderately steep slope shore into the gravely, rocky intertidal and shallow subtidal waters. 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Yes ®No If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes RNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Not Applicable 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: No lake, pond or wetland within the project area. b. Size(in acres): t K � 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ®Yes No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ®Yes r No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ®Yes ❑No 18. Is the site located inffYes gricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? R No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes No KZNJ 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ®Yes �No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 1.09 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 0.01 acres initially; 0.01 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 1.08 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: 150FT(if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. 0% f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0; proposed 0 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 0(upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially No house on site Ultimately No house planned L Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 6-FT height; 8-FT width; 151(+/-)length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? N/Atons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed 0Yes 11No ®N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Site reclamation is not a part of this project. b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 17 Yes ®No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®Yes ® No 4 How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers)will be removed from site? N/A acres. 4 r' 5. Will any mature fore, Ever 100 years old) or other locally-importar, letation be removed by this project? ®Yes pj No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 1 months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 1 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: 04 month 2019 year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: 05 month 2019 year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑ Yes r%7 No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes �No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 3; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project N/A 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?❑Yes 0 No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? 0 Yes �No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes rN7 No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes oNo If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? R7 Yes ❑No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes to No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ❑ No e. ' If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? FiYes RNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? 3 tons tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ®Yes 9 No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ®Yes No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? RYes ONo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? []Yes ® No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day N/A gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ®Yes 9 No If yes, explain: t L - 25. Approvals Required., f ,' Type Submittal Date Town of Southold City, Town, Village Board Yes ❑ No Board of Trustees City, Town, Village Planning Board ❑Yes ❑ No City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ❑ No City, County Health Department ❑Yes ❑ No Other Local Agencies ®Yes ❑ No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ❑ No NYSDEC August 2018 State Agencies �Yes ❑ No US ACOS August 2018 Federal Agencies r%7Yes ❑No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ❑Yes ® No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑ Zoning amendment ❑ Zoning variance ❑ New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision ❑ Site plan 17 Special use permit ®Resource management plan ❑ Other 2. What is the zoning 6, ficatlon(s) of the site? Residential 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Single Family Residence 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? Residential 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Not Applicable 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ®Yes ©No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/4 mile radius of proposed action? All the land use to the east, north and south of the site is residential. 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a'/4 mile? Yes ®No g. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10.E Will proposed actioi fiuire any authorization(s)for the formation 6_ _ fer or water districts? Yes 9No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? Yes No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? 0 Yes ©No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes 0 No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. ©Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name LCMG FINY, LLC Date Signature Title Applicant/Co-Owner If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. EFH ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR FEDERAL AGENCIES (modified 08/04) PROJECT NAME: DOCK Maintenance DATE: August 2018 PROJECT NO.: LOCATION: LCMG FINY, LLC Property, Fishers Island, NY PREPARER: DOCKO INC Keith B.Neilson, P.E Step 1. Use the Habitat Conservation Division EFH webpage,Guide to Essential Fish Habitat Designations in the Northeastern United States to generate the list of designated EFH for federally-managed species for the geographic area of interest (http://www.nero.noaa.gov/hcd/index2a.htm). Use the species list as part of the initial screening process to determine if EFH for those species occurs in the vicinity of the proposed action. Attach that list to the worksheet because it will be used in later steps. Make a preliminary determination on the need to conduct an EFH Consultation. -SG-•^-.•,.+5:-_..__.`s,t.:—`.- R±.:r_.�•=;;.-'.��,.a•,-;-.�;i„-• _ `,�';' r =':= _�=fY--:,:�^l""i"..".arc .,I�;,-+a�,�`'`'>i,tc";:'_,;�:3�:i�" c5;'i;_�'�.'-':'':r.tJ .'wd�^",y=' .fi.. =„t-„6_i ,,+.:F"r':'=_-T� ;1�_+:'-,-:x_=_ „ ;H:1•”:=x�i. �':r'4;.r. may;.-'�:-s= _ __'=�ti=€�t� _=_rtr.,,�-�-✓>,�,�'4;��tS�:x��';:;_:>�,�. #•�:7_:.��='r„ �+�,* kyr-+ "'7'' �4. F •`_ ..F;.o '�-"-_+' a'+�'_ 1� __~INlTIi4�.COIVSIDE1�i4T1 zsP` .�___�:�� _ _ _ _ �t_._R�--_ :n�:.. �:};u•-�•�_-=:���; EFH Designations' - Yes No_ Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for eggs? x Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for larvae? x Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for juveniles? x Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for adults? x Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for spawning adults? x If you answered no to all questions above,then EFH consultation is not required -go to Section 5. If you answered yes to any of the above questions proceed to Section 2 and complete remainder of the worksheet. Step 2.In order to assess impacts,it is critical to know the habitat characteristics of the site before the activity is undertaken. Use existing information,to the extent possible,in answering these questions. Please note that, there may be circumstances in which new information must be collected to appropriately characterize the site and assess impacts. l: f.'.:� yfi�1Q��N i� - .v''4--''.�' _ _ _�4- - '4'41S=j'':.:1:f "'4%•.___- - '41.M_,'-.r}i2 ':li uj'. +Y�4� .'.�^.'=^,.>Ta -"5::_Y'=e.-.", `•;-Yr:�,'-=d� _lz ���.r Wi=t 4.:ic^.,- i x:�f._-;-'x-vr2�'�_��-- -�� '=._i� :6•=.Y=.?�2;;_-�5-.,'K`�s ���z'_�i.-� -s-- +�-'.... -r+i» Tf=CHAMCITER s l ',�..-'''-}_;-.=?'rte: Site Characteristics: Description- - Is the site intertidal, sub-tidal, or This project is to maintain a pier, pilings replacing timbers with pile water column? supports. The project will encompass parts of the shoreline,the inter- tidal zone and shallow sub-tidal zone approximately 0.1 acres in size. See attached narrative What are the sediment The existing intertidal and shallow subtidal sediments are coarse sand characteristics? and approximately 5% gravel with exposed stone and 5 long-standing cribs which have deteriorated to the point requiring replacement. Is Habitat Area of Particular The site is an existing harbor exposed to prevailing climatic conditions Concern (HAPC) designated at wide open to north, northwest and west winds. The bluff is eroding due or near the site? If so what to exposure to normal tidal and climatic conditions and storm driven type,size, characteristics? waves from the northwest, despite the moderate to heavy vegetative cover. Is there submerged aquatic There is a 10 to 30-foot-wide strip of eel grass(SAV)in the shallow sub- vegetation (SAV) at or adjacent tidal waters out to 50 feet beyond the Mean Low Water line but there is to project site? If so describe no SAV detritus on the foreshore. The pier has existed at this site for the spatial extent. decades and no configuration changes are proposed and is configured to clear the SAV, at a height of 8 feet or more above the bottom sediments. What is typical salinity and Salinity varies somewhat seasonally but is typically in the 25-30 ppt. temperature regime/range? Temperature varies seasonally from approximately 30 degrees in the winter to 70 degrees in the summer. What is the normal frequency of Occasional, seasonal, weather dependent boating access to and from site disturbance, both natural the dock facilities along this stretch of shore. Most boating activity is and man-made? between April and November and is attributable to recreational boating. Storm disturbances are 5 to 10 per year and are usually moderate, occasionally severe.Boating disturbances and construction are minimal. What is the area of proposed Approximately 1/10 acre will be directly impacted by this recreational impact(work footprint&far dock project. afield)? Step 3. This section is used to describe the anticipated impacts from the proposed action on the physical/chemical/biological environment at the project site and areas adjacent to the site that may be affected. ••4%= �..T :s.: '-i' czz. ��� .'-.. - Y'i• 7e, __ •�,2.> i+,:ems. tit4.`.�d.�..'s - =-�1�:F, - = - - �;.'_+ = _ -.�£"=� �T--'-����_:�z'=._r:_6 r=vt.j,'�A'a�='v.�<�:�s•.i-_'�"*�"� - _ - _+-.r"i.sem-'-" .=+s,.�:T'z..k.,` �,-_b•V•� '_ '—— •'s'-"'-_" -w,'s`_t.=.. ,o-s'v��," '�-= x:;s, _QESCRIP ION'.0F IMPACT i-: = � r�5- _� - r ���_ w �s. - 4 i _te r_ .'f :::-' -.tom � _ +�._.F-` s:,c:�._::- -_�.t_•,-4a":•,c��;:+:i' 4.�t'�Zw:: Impacts. Y N Description" _ ag Nature and duration of X ` It is anticipated that the adverse impacts from this project will activity(s) ==_ t= be small because of the nature of the work. The project can = '?z take place in as little as a couple of weeks but will likely take a :Y=A=P months, tide and weather permitting. Barge access will be at -L �'1 high tide. The pier will remain an open wood pile and timber structure. Will benthic community be X The benthic community will be only marginally disturbed by disturbed? the marine construction barge and dock facility. No excavation or"in water"filling is proposed,only pile driving. Will SAV be impacted? X SAV, eel grass has been observed in the project area, but the pier has been configured to remain in the same foot print it has occupied for decades and the eel grass has grown in and around it. Will sediments be altered and/or X Sedimentation rates in the shallow subtidal zones will not sedimentation rates change? increase or change as a result of this project. Will turbidity increase? X Turbidity, on a day to day basis,will not change significantly from existing conditions. Bottom sediment disturbances are rare due to the rocky gravelly nature of the bottom sediments. This is a highly stressed shoreline due to wave dynamics most notably during low tide boating operations. (See attached Narrative Statement) Will water depth change? X No changes in water depth are proposed by or for construction equipment access or for boating operations. Will contaminants be released X Piles treated with CCA will release small amounts of arsenic into sediments or water and copper into the water column however the NYS DEC Study column? from 2000 finds those releases acceptable and warranted in view of the need to protect and preserve the marine construction timbers. Will tidal flow, currents or wave X No. The pier is of open-pile and timber construction. patterns be altered? Will ambient salinity or X This project will have no impact on water-flow and circulation temperature regime change? or drainage and will not affect salinity. Will water quality be altered? X Water quality should not change as to a significant extent as a result of this project beyond the bottom sediment disturbances resulting from marine equipment repositioning. I Step 4. This section is used to evaluate the consequences of the proposed action on the functions and values of EFH as well as the vulnerability of the EFH species and their life stages. Identify which species from the EFH species list (generated in Step 1) will be adversely impacted from the action. Assessment of EFH impacts should be based upon the site characteristics identified in Step 2 and the nature of the impacts described within Step 3. The Guide to EFH Descriptions webpage(http://www.nero.noaa.gov/hcd/list.htm)should be used during this assessment to determine the ecological parameters/preferences associated with each species listed and the potential impact to those parameters. - - - - ::� ..•fa-- lv.ii`__t t_`-4.T:R-S_. - "':y�.zl�?..,'�'8 - - 'u.1a`s - _rlYt`.: - - Vt'G A-' _ - >�..Yi�•�h•5�LX•> _ Ytiai'=:''�'�i�i __ ''i - Y�_r__ � . `r'_.J.-.,'T+"`, :ra^•�,s-' z.t_''4�.�'yxr.v`= "'''L'�t 4'zw"" - - .i`,. }'-';�aJ..'•+,`.s•�,a', ~4_ _ y?. r.'ice _✓-_,. E __ •`'... ASSESSMENT . , •_�y�. � :_;_,r�--r : r _•. :=w:-: r_=rK = , ,;am 'r, Functions and Values Y N Describe habitat type,species and life stages to be adversely impacted'- =' _ _ _•_'s Y.',.!•i`'•�,-it`_ .3_G':.':-sem.'` k5"':''�_ '+=l,la.?Kik'-'-z.-.� •F Will functions and values of =-- = iuyra' - _• =,V- -=- = �a =- ri - =>_- t ` M;� �===P�: l:'e.>::=-:�E• t=^�-_�a_�---�— EFH be for:impacted m., i_'YihaH Lr _'.S:I G\.f =3nn� -;7 �L,. ;r,• e, - =.i P - � -,7r��.,-�i1r�P��� - ..s,t,:' - - r- _' _i ''- •err,•-.,L+s..'"t spa`sia_1-}_>�s`-';_ '-,'r:,. =�y=,i..1't:�-i>`w'F-,"�y..v-qr•- _';,dk�',°'^.',�__=[°-`:_L•.,ai,�en',ai�.'-: #iP-i''..'--:t;,?'•:3`::-lv�ct�-c: ICY:..,'. Spawning The shallow subtidal zone and inter-tidal zone are currently sandy X gravel strewn with stones and boulders and will remain so without regard to this project. No alterations of the benthos or underwater habitat are proposed. This project should have no impact on submerged aquatic vegetation.This is a moderate energy wave zone. Nursery X The shallow subtidal zone and inter-tidal zone are currently sandy gravel with a linear, shore parallel eel grass fringe colony and will remain so as a result of this project. No alterations of the benthos or underwater habitat are proposed or anticipated except for driven plies. Nursery function should remain unchanged. Forage X The shallow subtidal zone and inter-tidal zone are currently sandy gravel and will remain so as a result of this project. No adverse impact to submerged aquatic vegetation is anticipated if it does exist in nearby waters. The pier structure piles spanning the water column should provide new habitat and foraging opportunities as barnacles and algae colonize the structure in the water column. Shelter X The shallow subtidal zone and intertidal zone are currently sandy gravel offering only shelter in amongst the crib stones which are to remain and will remain so as a result of this project. No adverse impact to submerged aquatic vegetation is anticipated. The pier structure and piles do provide shelter for small fish and habitat diversity. Will impacts be temporary or - _-' It is envisioned that any construction impacts experienced as a resultof this maintenance project will be temporary and not permanent but the permanent? new structure spanning the water column will be. The area of coverage _- of the proposed piles is small compared to the area of the cove and of no consequence compared to the overall fringe habitat and coastal ==`�= shoreline of Fishers Island. Will compensatory mitigation be X No compensatory mitigation' is proposed for this project. Approximately 500 SF of land is now and will be covered by a structure. used? Approximately 750 SF of intertidal and shallow subtidal,stony,gravelly sand sediments are now and will be covered by the pier. All of these features provide water column diversity and are similar to adjacent shoreline characteristics along Fishers Island's coastal perimeter. It is envisioned that the crib stone will continue to accumulate sediments and encourage submerged aquatic vegetation and red and green algae vegetation to grow, as opposed to the adjacent open waters and high beach with its wave damage tendencies. Step 5. This section provides the Federal agency--s determination on the degree of impact to EFH from the proposed action. The EFH determination also dictates the type of EFH consultation that will be required with NOAA Fisheries. �-;�.�- -��'^•. ---fit,:' - ��;3.xi,-'.���.�.�_=��'n`� ar:::^�,^�.�y-+ � � fir,DETERMINaT10N OE'IIIIIPACT; �_*mss-t� = � .,:3;. ;� x _�. _, .; , Federal Agency=s EFH Determination _ X There is no adverse effect on EFH Overall degree of EFH Consultation is not required adverse effects on EFH (not including The adverse effect on EFH is not substantial. compensatory mitigation)will be: This is a request for an abbreviated EFH consultation.This worksheet is being submitted to NMFS to satisfy the EFH (check the appropriate Assessment requirement. statement) The adverse effect on EFH is substantial. This is a request for an expanded EFH consultation. A detailed _ written EFH assessment will be submitted to NMFS expanding upon the impacts revealed in this worksheet. Step 6. Consultation with NOAA Fisheries may also be required if the proposed action results in adverse impacts to other NOAA-trust resources,such as anadromous fish,shellfish,crustaceans,or their habitats. Some examples of other NOAA-trust resources are listed below. Inquiries regarding potential impacts to marine mammals or threatened/endangered species should be directed to NOAA Fisheries' Protected Resources Division. PAC IV ATRU ST RESOURCES IMP%CCT ASSESSMENT; Species known:to occur Describe habitat impact type(i.e., physical,chemical,or biological'. at site(list others_ that_- disruption of spawning and/or egg'development habitat,juvenile nursery may apply)= _and/or adult feeding or migration habitat): : alewife blueback herring rainbow smelt Atlantic sturgeon Atlantic menhaden American shad American eel Physical Changes, not disruptive American lobster Physical Changes, not disruptive blue mussels Physical Changes, not disruptive soft-shell clams quahog Ph sical Changes, not disruptive,no adverse impact Otherspecies: New k.,..:' State Department of Environmental Conservation' Y tt! �A PERMISSION TO INSPECT PROPERTY By signing this permission form for submission with an application for a permit(s) to the Department of Environmental Conservation("DEC'),the signer consents to inspection by DEC staff of the project site or facility for which a permit is sought and, to the extent necessary, areas adjacent to the project site or facility. This consent allows DEC staff to enter upon and pass through such property in order to inspect the project site or facility,without prior notice, between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. If DEC staff should wish to conduct an inspection at any other times, DEC staff will so notify the applicant and will obtain a separate consent for such an inspection. Inspections may take place as part of the application review prior to a decision to grant or deny the pennit(s) sought. By signing this consent form, the signer agrees that this consent remains in etTect as long as the application is pending, and is effective regardless of whether the signer,applicant or an agent is present at the time of the inspection. In the event that the project site or facility is posted with any form of"posted" or"keep out" notices,or fenced in with an unlocked gate, this permission authorizes DEC staff to disregard such notices or unlocked gates at the time of inspection. The signer further agrees that during an inspection, DEC staff may, among other things, take measurements, may analyze physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, soils and vegetation (taking samples for analysis), and may make drawings and take photographs. Failure to grant consent for an inspection is grounds for, and may result in, denial of the pen-nit(s) sought by the application. Permission is granted for inspection of property located at the following address(es): 3773 Clay Point Road,Fishers Island, NY 06390 By signing this form, 1 cJ1u•rn under penalty u1•perjwy that I am uttthcrrizecl to give consent to entry by DEC staff'as described above. 1 understand that false statements made herein are Punishable as a Class A rnisdetneanor purstr int to Section 210 1S c �t e Pencil Latin " Leslie Goss for LCMG FINY, LLC /� u Print Name and Title Signature Date *'rhe signer of this form must be an individual or authorized representative of a legal entity that, • owns fee title and is in possession of the property identified above, • maintains possessory interest to the property through a lease,rental agreement or other legally binding agreement:or • is provided permission to act on behalf of an individual or legal entity possessing fee title or other possessory interest in the property for the purpose of consenting to inspection of such property. Permission to Inspect Property:\pplication Supplement 12/08 1 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Federal Consistency Assessment Form An applicant,seeking a permit,license,waiver,certification or similar type of approval from a federal agency which is subject to the New York State Coastal Management Program(CMP),shall complete this assessment form for anyproposed activity that will occur within and/or directly affect the State's Coastal Area. This form is intended to assist an applicant in certifying that the proposed activity is consistent with New York State's CMP as required by U.S. Department of Commerce regulations(15 CFR 930.57).It should be completed at the time when the federal application is prepared. The Department of State will use the completed form and accompanying information in its review of the applicant's certification of consistency. A.APPLICANT (please print) 1.Name: LCMG FINY,LLC, Leslie O.Goss 2.Address: 11888 SW Breyman Avenue, Portland, CT 97219 3.Telephone: Area Code( ) 503-819-7818 B.PROPOSED ACTIVITY 1.Brief description of activity: 1�4aentnln I-r-1(+I--)I E of exostinq R-El%�irle fixed marl pier of wbich 19001--)l E is watevAlard of the AHINI including the installation of 32'new pier support piles,maintain the landward most stone filled timber pier support crib,and remove the outermost 4 support crib timbers.Replace 3 tie-off piles and install 1 new tie- off pile, all at and waterward of the Apparent High licle line in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. 2.Purpose of activity: This is a private dock for recreational boating. 3.Location of activity: Suffolk Fishers Island,Town of Southold 3773 Clay Point Road County City,Town,or Village Street or Site Description 4.Type of federal permit/license required:Town of Southold,NYSDEC,US ACOE Rivers and Harbors Act 5.Federal application number,if known:pending 6.If a state permit/license was issued or is required for the proposed activity,identify the state agency and provide the application or permit number,if known: C.COASTAL ASSESSMENT Check either"YES"or"NO"for each of these questions. The numbers following each question refer to the policies described in the CMP document(see footnote on page 2)which may be affected by the proposed activity. , 1.Will the proposed activity result in any of the following: YES/NO a.Large physical change to a site within the coastal area which will require the preparation 13 10 of an environmental impact statement? (11,22,25,32,37,38,41,43).. ... .. .. . .. . . . . b.Physical alteration of more than two acres of land along the shoreline,land © 10 under water or coastal waters? (2, 11, 12,20,28,35,44).. ... ..... .... .... . .... . . . c.Revitalization/redevelopment of a.deteriorated or underutilized waterfront site? (1). . .. .. a d.Reduction of existing or potential public access to or along coastal waters? (19,20) .. .. .. Q J0 e.Adverse effect upon the commercial or recreational use of coastal fish resources? (9,10). . . Q f. Siting of a facility essential to the exploration,development and production of energy resources in coastal waters or on the Outer Continental Shelf? (29)........ .... ....... 11 g. Siting of a facility essential to the generation or transmission of energy? (27).. .. . . .. . . . EL -0 h.Mining,excavation,or dredging activities,or the placement of dredged or fill material in coastal waters? (15,35). ... .. .... . ... ..... . . . .... .. ...... .. .. ...... .. .. .. .. Q 10 i.Discharge of toxics,hazardous substances or other pollutants into coastal waters? (8, 15,35) Q J0 j.Draining of stormwater runoff or sewer overflows into coastal waters? (33).. .. .. .. .. .. Q -0 k. Transport,storage,treatment,or disposal of solid wastes or hazardous materials? (36,39) . . Q 1.Adverse effect upon land or water uses within the State's small harbors? (4).. ... ..... . . Q 2.Will the proposed activity affect or be located in,on,or adjacent to any of the following: YES/NO a. State designated freshwater or tidal wetland? (44) .. ...... . ..... ....... ... .... . ... 0 b.Federally designated flood and/or state designated erosion hazard area? (11, 12, 17,). .. . . c.State designated significant fish and/or wildlife habitat? (7). .... ...... .. .. . . .. . . . . . 13 I State designated significant scenic resource or area? (24).... .. .... .... .. .. . ...... .. . _ e. State designated important agricultural lands? (26). .. .. .. .. ... . .... ...... .. .. . . . . g f.Beach,dune or barrier island? (12)... . . .... .. . . .. .. .... .. .... :... .. . ... ... . .. g.Major ports of Albany,Buffalo,Ogdensburg,Oswego or New York? (3). .. .. .. .. .. . . .. h.State,county,or local park? (19,20).. .. . .. .. . ... .. .... . ... . . .... ..... ... . . . . . i.Historic resource listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places? (23)... .. . . . 3.Will the proposed activity require any of the following: YES/NO a.Waterfront site? (2,21,22).. .. ... .. .. .. .... .. .... .. .. .. . ..... .. ...... .. . . . . b.Provision of new public services or infrastructure in undeveloped or sparsely populated sections of the coastal area? (5) .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .... .. .............. ... . ... . C.Construction or reconstruction of a flood or erosion control structure? (13, 14, 16). . ... .. Q d.State water quality permit or certification? (30,38,40)... . .... ....... . . .... .. . .. .. �� e.State air quality permit or certification? (41,43). .. .... .... .. .......... ...... .. .. _ _ 4. Will the proposed activity occur within and/or affect an area covered by a State approved local waterfront revitalization program? (see policies in local program document)........ . . . . . . 61 13 D.ADDITIONAL STEPS 1.If all of the questions in Section C are answered"NO",then the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the documentation required by Section F. 2.If any of the questions in Section C are answered"YES",then the applicant or agent is advised to consult the CMP,or where appropriate,the local waterfront revitalization program document*.The proposed activity mustbe analyzed in more detail with respect to the applicable state or local coastal policies. On a separate page(s),the applicant or agent shall: (a) identify,by their policy numbers,which coastal policies are affected by the activity,(b)briefly assess the effects of the activity upon the policy; and,(c)state how the activity is consistent with each policy. Following the completion of this written assessment,the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the documentation required by Section F. E.CERTIFICATION The applicant or agent must certify that the proposed activity is consistent with the State's CMP or the approved local waterfront revitalization program,as appropriate. If this certification cannot be made,the proposed activity shall not be undertaken., If this certification can be made,complete this Section. "The proposed activity complies with New York State's approved Coastal Management Program,or with the applicable approved local waterfront revitalization program,and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program." Applicant/Agent's Name: LCMG FINY,LLC \-�;(L Address:11888 SW Breyman Avenue,Portland,OR 97219 Telephone: Area Code( 503 )819-7918 Applicant/Agenes Signature: 10 Date: ' �Z F.SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS 1.The applicant or agent shall submit the following documents to the New York State Department of State,Office of Coastal,Local Government and Community Sustainability,Attn:Consistency Review Unit, 1 Commerce Plaza,99 Washington Avenue-Suite 1010,Albany,New York 12231. a.Copy of original signed form. b.Copy of the completed federal agency application. c.Other available information which would support the certification of consistency. 2.The applicant or agent shall also submit a copy of this completed form along with his/her application to the federal agency. 3. If there are any questions regarding the submission of this form,contact the Department of State at (518) 474-6000. *These state and local documents are available for inspection at the offices of many federal agencies,Department of environmental Conservation and Department of State regional offices,and the appropriate regional and county planning agencies. Local program documents are also available for inspection at the offices of the appropriate local government. k LCMG FINY,LLC FISHERS ISLAND SOUND FISHERS ISLAND,NEW YORK NARRATIVE STATEMENT & SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR NYS DEC,NYS/DOS AND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATIONS P, k August 2018 GENERAL LCMG FINY, LLC owns parcel 1000-2.4-14.1 off Clay Point Road a private road, located along the west shore of Clay Point along Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island. The site is generally g moderately sloped, sandy gravel soils, vegetated with grass, brush, landscaping ground cover and trees. The frontage of the property is approximately 400 feet along Fishers Island Sound at the east shore, abutted by the Mr. J Geddis Parsons property to the north and Rocky Ledge Partners, LLC to the south. The waterfront consists of a partially rock-covered beach with tidal wetlands vegetation at the base of the moderately sloped coastal bluff in the vicinity of the pier. a It is LCMG FINY, LLC desire to maintain the existing fixed pier dock system but using driven wood piles to replace the deteriorated cribs. The pier will be at an end elevation of 6 feet �. above Mean Low Water(MLW), sloping upward and crossing over the boulder-strewn intertidal zone above the bottom sediments until reaching a finished elevation of about 10 feet to shore at that ielevation, stopping short of the bank where it comes ashore with a ramped section of-about 20 foot length which allows passage of the public on the rocky beach below; a rare event. Attached are application drawings prepared for this project showing this configuration and pertinent details. di P This supplemental narrative has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Town of Southold, Ordinance No. 6, 2004, and the Waterfront Revitalization Program related to docks and shorefront improvements. In addition, various coastal policies under the New York State Coastal Management Act are addressed herein for review by the New York State Department of State and Department of Environmental Conservation. This project is maintenance of a longstanding pier and dock facility. DESCRIPTION OF WORK ` As mentioned in the introductory paragraph, this project is to retain and maintain a fixed wood pile and timber pier changing the supports from cribs to piles along the shore out into Fishers Island Sound in accordance with existing guidelines set forth in the Town of Southold ordinance No. 6, 2004. It is envisioned that this structure will be built utilizing the following general sequence and methodology. ➢ The marine contractor will arrive by water with barge-mounted crane and push boats. ➢ The existing pier will be maintained, and all wood salvaged from the cribs for disposal in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and ordinances. ➢ New piles will be driven starting at the shore landing end of the pier and proceeding waterward at roughly 10-foot intervals to the waterward end of the pier. These piles will be driven by double-acting air hammer to a bearing capacity of 20 tons and pull-out resistance of approximately 10 tons. This generally requires about twelve to fifteen feet of embedment of the pile in the bearing stratum. Because of the exposure with the prevailing wind westerly 1 wave 1, these piles will be 12-inch nom- diameter class B Southern Yellow Pine pressure treated to 2.5 pcf of CCA Type C. ➢ After the piles are installed, split caps (also referred to as split clamps) consisting of a pair of pressure treated Southern Pine timbers, 4 x 10 to 4 x 12 nominal dimension, will be bolted to the piles transversely forming a pile bent. Stringers will be then laid on the split caps parallel to the length of the pier. In all likelihood, five runs of stringers will be set and will probably consist of 3 x 10 pressure-treated Southern Pine. ➢ The outer stringer on each side will be bolted or spiked to the pile to secure it against wave uplift forces that this pier might be exposed to. ➢ After the stringers have been connected to the piles and split caps, the decking will be installed. In accordance with Town of Southold's Ordinance No. 6, 2004, this decking will not be CCA pressure-treated Southern-Pine but rather oak, cedar hardwood or plastic / composite such as "Timber Tech" or similar synthetic, composite or plastic material with the brushed side mounted up. If composites or plastic are used, it will be either gray,brown or natural in color. Decking will be attached to the stringers utilizing galvanized nails or'stainless-steel Phillips or flathead square-drive wood screws about 3 inches long and will be set with a '/a" gap between deck planks. ➢ The over-water decking will run level at a height of up to eight feet above the existing bottom sediments in the shallow subtidal zone. See Sheet 4 of the application drawings for the pier profile. ➢ The piles will be about 42 inches above the deck surface and support horizontal rail members. ➢ The mid-rail can be timber or cable and both details are shown. ➢ A top rail of cedar, oak,hardwood or Timber Tech material will be installed for safety. ➢ Water and electricity will be run out on the pier in the space between the stringers so that trickle chargers on the boat may be powered during tie-ups. The water will allow boats to be rinsed off after usage. A power post with an internal light will be mounted to the end of the fixed pier with receptacles to provide power to the boats from extension cords. The power post will also have coiling arms for storage of the electric service cord and hose between uses. Because the dock may be used during the hours of darkness, low-intensity lights will be mounted on staggered piles or dock rail posts to illuminate the deck and the walking surface up the bank. This system will be manually,or radio controlled with a shut-off timer so that the lights will only be on when necessary for safety of the users. LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION POLICIES The Town of Southold, LWRP policies that are applicable to the dock proposal are a local refinement of the Long Island Sound Regional Coastal Management Program policies that apply throughout Long Island Sound. The Goss site is off Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island and is characterized predominately as undeveloped coast or natural coast. The undeveloped coast policies are applicable as follows: ➢ Policy 1 is to foster a pattern of development that enhances community character and preserves natural resources to the maximum extent and minimizes adverse impacts on the environment, ➢ Policy 2 is to preserve historic resources, ➢ Policy 3 is to enhance and protect scenic resources and visual quality. The pier maintenance and crib removal for LCMG FINY, LLC is consistent with waterfront development on Fishers Island and in coastal areas. The pier is made of suitably-sized timbers and utilizes the materials allowable under Local Law #6 with due consideration of climatic conditions at the site and replacement components will conform as well. This proposal is consistent with other 2 adjacent dock _-,ilities and characteristics for thy:1 usual and scenic considerations. The encroachment is not significant, to be consistent with DEC policies, Southold Local Law #6, US ACOE policies and the structure is as low profile as possible, consistent with the safe and efficient use of the waters and consistent with the tidal and wave exposure of this site. Lighting will be minimal for operational safety and otherwise off, and lights will be utilized only when necessary for boating purposes so that during hours of darkness there will be no adverse impact NATURAL COAST POLICIES The Natural Coastal Policies are 4 through 8 and require consideration as follows: ➢ Policy 4—Minimize loss of life, structures and natural resources from flooding and erosion, ➢ Policy 5 —Protect and improve water quality ➢ Policy 6—Protect and restore the quality and function of the eco-system, ➢ Policy 7—Protect and improve air quality, ➢ Policy 8 - Minimize environmental degradation primarily from solid waste and hazardous substances. The pier maintenance crib removal for LCMG FINY, LLC recreational boating facility has been laid out and configured so as to be the same footprint as the pier which has been here for decades, consistent with the DEC permit requirements for such structures and in accordance with recommendations of the Marine Habitat Protection Bureau offered during the workshop pre- application. There was no tidal wetlands vegetation on the beach where the pier begins. The pier has been configured high, over submerged aquatic vegetation which has grown around the pier in the shallow subtidal waters. As such, it provides adequate height to clear environmental resources of concern and the materials to be utilized are consistent with Town of Southold's Local Law 46 regarding environmental quality and the use of pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine timber components in particular. Pier maintenance work will have no adverse impacts on air quality as a result of this structure and the work on the dock should not diminish overall environmental considerations in Fishers Island Sound. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9 sets forth a priority to provide for public access and recreational use of coastal waters, public lands and public resources of the Town. This project maintains a longstanding (decades old) recreational boating facility for the LCMG FINY, LLC property and so is consistent with this policy. WORKING COAST POLICIES The policies of this section relate to the following: ➢ Policy 10 — Protection of the Town's water-dependent uses and promoting new water- dependent uses in suitable locations, ➢ Policy 11 —Promoting sustainable use of living marine resources, ➢ Policy 12—Protect agricultural lands, ➢ Policy 13 —Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. While most of the Working Coast Policies are not applicable to this site or this type of project, Policy 10, promoting water-dependent uses and the siting of water-dependent uses in appropriate areas is applicable. The proposed maintenance project makes the most beneficial use of the land and keeping the dock facility in the most appropriate, historic point of the land where access down:the 3 bank will not �_.ire changes in structural facilities anL: be accommodated with path work rather than formal stairs and so on. This project has been laid out with specific reference and review of the Waterfront Revitalization Program policies and is considered to be consistent. In summary, the dock is typical of recreational boating facilities throughout the area and all along coastal New England. The pier structure maintains the same length,width,height, and structure so as to be consistent with other facilities of a similar nature and the minimum necessary components to accommodate safe and efficient boating operations from this site safely in a variety of climatic conditions. Pile supports will be utilized instead of cribs and old crib timbers will be removed leaving the stone on the bottom for habitat diversity. This project does not interfere with public access or use of public trust waters and lands of the State, it does not interfere with navigation, it will not create soil or sedimentation erosion problems, it does not adversely environmental resources and in the area where the facility must span the intertidal zone at the shore line, the facility will be maintained in the area of rocks where environmental resources have already acclimated to the pier and boating activity so as not to worsen any of these conditions. The height of the structure has been specifically addressed so as to maintain clearance above the shoreline tidal wetlands plants if other conditions are conducive to such growth. The dock facility maintenance reach out to 4 feet of water in Fisher Island Sound so that dredging will not be an issue in the future, thus further minimizing adverse environmental impacts. More than 95% of the LCMG FINY, LLC shoreline will remain in a natural state as a result of these considerations for design. There is no loss of valuable marine and wetland habitat and no water quality degradation as a result of this project. No natural protective features or processes will be adversely impacted as a result of the maintenance work on the docking facility. Dense growth areas of submerged aquatic vegetation in the proposed dock or berthing area have been avoided. Reference is made to the NYS DEC study from 2000 indicating the suitability of pressure- treated Southern Yellow Pine piles and super-structure components for this type of purpose. The piles must be 12-inch diameter due to site exposure. In accordance with Local Law#6, decking for the pier and the approach ramp will be of woods other than Southern Yellow Pine or plastic. This project is consistent with zoning policies and ordinances for the Town. The dock facility will be an accessory to the home located at this site. There will be no development of the upland related to this dock facility that will create point sources of pollution or drainage. This project is providing recreational boating and water usage opportunities compatible with the natural resource values and characteristics of the site. The dock is existing sized for stability considerations especially acknowledging that waves from the north can come in from Fishers Island Sound and the dock is angled more or less into those waves. REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 97-25 OF THE WETLANDS LAW 6.2004 The permittee acknowledges that the validity of this permit is subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. The permittee does, by the acceptance of this permit, assume all responsibility for operations undertaken pursuant to this permit, and shall take all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property resulting from such operations. By such acceptance, the permittee also agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Town and its officers. The permittee gives consent to the Town and its officers, employees and agents to enter upon the premises where such operations are being conducted to make such inspections to determine whether said operations are being conducted in conformity with the permit. 4 The pc'- tee will notify the Trustees in writing_ _<<e week prior to initiation of any and all operations. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing upon completion of operations such that the site can be inspected for issuance for a certificate of compliance. In response to Sub-section 2a and the General Rules for Standards of Residential and Commercial Docks, the following additional information is offered. 1. Permits for the work are being applied for through the Town, US ALOE, NYS DEC and a coastal zone consistency determination by the NYS DOS. 2. The new piles to be installed will be of sturdy, durable and stable materials; in all likelihood, Greenhart, Kakaralli or CCA Type C pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine (SYP) 12-inch diameter class B piles with new split caps and braces of pressure-treated SYP materials. These members will be a minimum of 3 x 8's and more often, 3 x 10's and 4 x 10's with at least one 1-inch bolt per connection, and in other cases,two % inch bolts per connection. This pier is a fixed, pile-supported timber structure and therefore will not adversely affect the free circulation of water or reduce the effects of fluctuating water levels in Fishers Island Sound or West Harbor. In addition,the pier does not present any adverse modification of the shoreline. The pier's end elevation is such that in extreme high flood tides the structure will, be inundated. The structure's SYP timber materials represent the standard of the industry being specifically grown a renewable resource for this type of usage and are capable of withstanding full immersion. With the connections described above, this structure will be able to survive repeated inundations and even direct waves at high tide elevations with a structural life of approximately 20 years. 3. The pier support will include driving new 12-inch diameter piles at 10-foot intervals to the maximum extent possible in order to obtain the desired pier alignment and support intervals. The pier is situated toward the northerly line of West Harbor, however this part of the shoreline would be more accurately characterized as Fishers Island Sound from the wave exposure design perspective. While Southold Local Law 6 dictates smaller piles sizes, such piles would be inadequate in,this location. Waves,of 2 to 3 feet are not uncommon at this site, hence the ravaged shoreline features. Clay Point extends out to the north beyond Osprey Point on the west edge of West Harbor. Waves from Long Island Sound can be influenced by a fetch of a hundred miles. These waves can defract and refract around North Hill and come right at this site. The piles proposed for this project will need to be 12-inch Class B piles with 8-inch tips in order to withstand the sea conditions and driving conditions. The use of CCA pressure-treated timbers and Class B 12-inch piles can thus be approved for this project in accordance with Local Law 6. 4. The pier will not be decked with CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine. This pier/ walkway provides a safe pedestrian surface for access to the berthed boat. Rails shown to may be installed on the pier for safety. 5 5. pier is located near the center of tf,_ _,,operty line. The 15-foot clearance specified in this paragraph has been honored and should not be an issue because the proposed pier does not represent a significant encroachment into the boating operation area of the property to the south or to the north nor does it project into the navigation way for other boaters in the Harbor. 6. Upon receipt of the permit for this project, appropriate permit numbers and a Town permit placard will be affixed to the most seaward face of the pier for identification from the water. 7. There are no permanent structures located above the pier decking, nor are any planned at this time, other than the power post and railing which are fixed by function. 8. It is currently possible to provide a five-foot passage way beneath this pier and that access ability will be retained landward of the apparent high-water line. There is only minimal room to walk under the pier at high tide, however, foot traffic in this area is rare, if at all and so the additional structure of an up and over stairway has been left out of this pier layout. NEW YORK STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM These application documents include a copy of the Federal Consistency Assessment Form utilized for the New York State Coastal Management Program under the jurisdiction of the New York State Department of State. The following policies have been identified as pertinent to this application and the reason for consistency associated with this project is outlined in each respective case. Policy 2 Water Dependent Uses—This project is to maintain a fully functional water dependent use, a recreational boating dock facility at this site in support of recreational boating. Poligy 5 —Use of Existing Developed Shorefront—There is no developed shoreline on this site. This project utilizes natural existing shorefront which is dominated by an accumulation of stone which has abundant vegetative resources such as bittersweet, poison ivy and junipers with only sporadic patches of tidal wetlands vegetation or individual plants. The project will be to rebuild the pier and remove crib timbers to the existing shoreward terminus to make it safe and reliably usable in most weather conditions without impeding shoreline public access. Policy 7 — Significant Fish & Wildlife Habitat—Protection of significant fish and wildlife habitat has been considered in the development of this project layout. The pier, to the shoreward point of beginning, has avoided the shoreline spartina patches and runs 4 to 5 feet above the rocky intertidal sediments and should not jeopardize the health of any shoreline vegetation. Typically, there is a slight environmental benefit to a pier project because o�the creation of structure in the water column where barnacles, algae and crustaceans will colonize and,grow. The alignment of the pier remains as is so as not to adversely affect the eel grass fringe strip that follows the 3 to 4 contours around the existing pier. Policy 8 —Protection & Preservation of Habitat Protection and preservation of habitat has also been considered in this project and the dock structure is being kept to its longstanding configuration and of materials consistent with standards of the industry and restrictions set forth in the Wetlands Law, No. 6, 2004 set forth by the Town of Southold and standards of the NYS DEC. The pier point of origin will remain over a stony part of the beach to make use of the least habitat and minimize damage to natural resources. 6 Policy 11 —Minimize Damage to Natural Resources - The dock construction project has been laid out in such a way so as to minimize damage or impact to natural resources as identified in Policy 7 above. The dock facility will remain in its longstanding location where stone on the beach has already impacted shoreline vegetation and the length is the minimum practical length for the slip to reach 4 feet of water depth at MLW. Policy 14 — No Measurable Increase in Flooding - This project consists of construction of an open wood pile and timber pier which in no way adversely affects waterflow and circulation in West Harbor or Fishers Island Sound or flooding potential of the area. Flood levels all around Fishers Island are dictated by water levels in Long Island Sound, Fishers Island Sound and Block Island Sound and this structure will have no adverse influence or in any way impact on those levels. Policy 15—No Dredging—Dredging is not required in this project. The dock will be maintained out in its current location and configuration to avoid any dredging requirements. The depth of 4 feet, as generally recommended by the NYS DEC and US ACOE, has been reached. The waters are not protected enough that boats can be berthed bow to shore but rather bow out in the deeper water. The boat will not ground out at low tide. Policy 19 —Impact on Public Access—Public access will not be jeopardized or impeded as a result of this project. As a matter-of fact, there is almost no public access usage of the public trust lands or waters at this site except kayaking and canoeing and that is rare. The intertidal zone is significantly covered by stone and boulders and that is common on adjacent properties. The shallow sub-tidal waters do not present any opportunity or enticement for public access in the area. The pier stops well short of the landward 25% of the waterway width in accordance with U&ACOE policies. West Harbor is more that a mile wide at this point. Thus, public access to the State's lands and waters will not be adversely affected by the project. Policy 20 — Public Trust Compatibility with Existing Adjoining Properties and Land Uses- Public Trust compatibility with existing adjoining properties and land uses have also been considered in this project. Several nearby properties have docking facilities similar to this one and this docking facility will not interfere with existing or the likely configuration of future facilities on immediately adjoining properties or the logical allocation of littoral development rights. Policy 21 —Water Dependent Recreation—This project is consistent with water-dependent recreational opportunities policies set forth in this section. Policy 24 —Scenic Resources, Impairment or Loss - This policy is designed to prevent impairment or loss of scenic resources. The length, height and width of the fixed wood pile and timber pier will not represent such an extent of encroachment or structure which would create a loss of scenic resources on adjacent or nearby properties or views from the water. i f Policy 25 — Enhance Overall Scenic Quality - The maintained dock structure will be consistent with the scenic quality of the area and prevent loss of scenic resources as described in Policy 24 above. Policy 44 — Preserve and Protect Tidal Wetlands — It is acknowledged that the spartina alterna flora exists sporadically in very small patches along the shorefront. The maintenance of the fixed wood pile and timber pier will take advantage of the un-vegetated strip of the shoreline caused by the longstanding pier landing over stone in order to avoid adverse wetlands vegetation impact. The height of the pier should allow opportunities for the growth of the spartina fringe marsh naturally up to, and to an extent, beneath the wood pier if other conditions are suitable, and the same with submerged aquatic vegetation. 7 SUMMARY This project is for pier maintenance for recreational boating access at property of the LCMG FINY, LLC on Fishers Island. .A copy of all US Army Corps of Engineers, NYS DEC and Town of Southold applications are attached as substantiation for this project. This project complies with applicable standards of the New York State Coastal Management Act, NYS / DEC Tidal Wetland Regulations and criteria for approval, the Town of Southold Waterfront Revitalization Program and Local Ordinance No. 6, 2004 and its approval is thus respectfully requested. Respectfully submitted, DOCKO,INC. e Keith B.Neilson,P.E. 8 TAX ASSESSOR'S 1000-2.1-rf.i PROJECT: "DOCK MAINTENANCE" WATERWAY: FISHERS ISLAND SOUND LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK APPLICANT: LCMG FINY,LLC AGENT: DOCKO,INC, FISHERS ISLAND SOUND C z — ERR f ti^ 2 11.3 r•. 3.0A 3.2A MIAlc1 6 `O- V 3 5.2 '0 39A a� ,p 1.1A jO• )M � � v 7.3 as MAW b x = 9.SA g MA 3.6A1e1 123 2.1A7.4 O b T.4 3.4A 8.1 ; 1.6A v pt,r. 13.1 n) 0.2 ,^ u7.2 x a sse r�J 1.7A 4,2A s 16.3 17 14.1 MA ^ypF ' S.lA 16.3 { a S.BA 1B MAW CII s T•a` a 15.2 b 1.5A P)}Ac.Lhe —M—' UNLESS ORA— OFNERY�SE� ALL PROPER1,E5 NOTICE az, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Q K ARE w�—ruH i�E FCLLOWP.0 Ops TRICr S, iD kj� E SCe OCL SEER_ ..0 4AiNTEN6N:E,ALTERATION.SALE OR ° p Real Property Tax Service Agency Y .rvlco0!).ric.lM —NSf — FOE_711 MYORa4i DSTRIBUTION OF ANY PCR TION OF 7,IE 9• `b —_L_ ',p)rk L�— •— L,cq, — pc, `= County Center Riverhead,N Y 1]961 eT SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX VAP 5 FPON1E SCALE V FEET A —_ .........e.bs..k.LW —YA—— AudUVNCC usTE-Es lITHOUT (OFTEN FEWASSIOv CF INE 3O'i� - a na sm P cEPRr e7 REAL PROPERTY FIX SERVICE ACENtr NecvtoNnan�8tocalsuNcr77rrri LOCATION MAP I 1 j PROJECT: "NEW PIER AND FLOAT" :�5 ! WATERWAY: FISHERS ISLAND SOUND - -- ____________ LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 53 GT ICUT y^ SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK i J ��E g1 co � APPLICANT: DONALD YOUNG t art `N AGENT: DOCKO,INC. .--_EO, 67 ^�\ ��' 53 54 `� clump � 35 _ �71 42 West, clump PolpI' j• , -, - 1. -\Z L, _ _��-�,� ,. �� �__ I^j• .x''S i _Rock 9 �• 7 •.�- �1 x k it Pine r lRiands Brgloki�—. Point �` Hungry 6: ��•_Eas 27 J 'Ii• �� i Pain; Ha'I�b �* * ���:��-�; ��•�• Fou ( ,:. x-30 /,�------_ '-_� —' \\��:. � / 1 •t►. > 11� , .� 7�� ..lN11 / C•tto- r f � � '�••)Y�:; '`�r. '� 'i i`���hlT Ill• -'w -' 11'j Jh-'• �:: "" _ r.' �,1 I •x•Ch / � _` '�7r,'_'(r -`.�1 18 �U• ��- J'tQj;! `"� ' - f cv.,�,I 6=-- II• 5 ���r J ', Jp ♦�� •?!• � is�'��+j(� I `'�;'4✓ •t� �"�` \ f11\ `" /'-. .,•.•t�'1�: •L d J✓ D} - - \ � is .\,.�Ji `^IOM •.,." � p^.� --a�.-i7 i�_111�����1_l-j'�•_a/:I)I. .•. ? I *1/i• 1 1 �I ) >\�r.•;F �r - l,Y •Y t?J Ou \ ,i� \` o^ i ..���``\ j x j .l ti0 _ tv i ! I t =`/_ _ •1� II r �_\. (c}\ rc.� `�\; ' - tie 6 1 �' .I �` - _ _- ' _- �a 11 u:-. ��, 8 'i\.e`^1't ;"�r% � \� � •,, _ --- -1 Q,'G._,fv'p� n .�P,^ - �;r �'• {,�� e ,I�_ III �(�J'�,1 _ ,,t e• - �/ �a--''wig •i•.;�:• �-• _II `� �' C / �. .� 0 �1l`� -•�. Qf-- �c/j`� 'F"�' -k• '���-� O r ry' � _- r;__:• -� - II ,�,(1�'0� l i 4 ,�� jnl' �'~ F,�12—i- (I# •,�_�=1�50`tL" !' ^o' 'l\� Y IF-, J Sp_•�,�ll,'1 ' off i • IS \ 1 'I ` I _ •ll• - -{� - _/'r�'\'' IIC_ Post 1% �. J8 i� o\ f��\�•`,i�T�0:3'Al'nG%y-%a•�'k + %�"" -�~ Fla '" tt'- _3"- Pon 46 Isl nd P� nd �; (i / �� I-fie/\Tye.-?_•:i lfCl., '�F/./ / � / 21 79 .�j•f+s- � 11: -•'I' I'I _!,^ ..-_ -% I - ,. ,,, � / � �`G o�~ -)fes -51' �I _ __t I, / • C 57 96 25 t S,, 3: • II ;� " tiNoilh bulnphng I O FI4/Flant ntn,k .s''• rJiq `� � d^ ars o° 11 � .t.: 1�` 1 ��c,pa,ry.d9 .. -... r/ :Clay Point Rd,--' '19F-is 0: 1 GatanbyRuch ,�-- " ° :� � Fishers Island r 4 i r� J t,fti -1+•- l Fox-A,ve t . v C.•^ .� .+p' "AVC:_\.;��Et``1' 'a.� l�� \ C Otri Google. � .y r 1 t Goose earth j(' /•Imo, dfff� 332711 M8 I I._- _ ....� / -� / Image w'ta1Y fmraMeurcs J _i ✓ / /^'Y , ~! i Ininl�er/r)nl�':1fli;il!!UIn X11=Irr'.i•i.'/u'll /t '�'+J!.Irl'.'I 4�Ir•. t/II oy",It 1-1 0 17-7 P99 .a,ia�-._-_ - •�r" n'�h,�a:} -1 a X r �.+r�-"Tr�`„�" xh t j 07 T ,z �' l �'. '• .. � .. _ ate` .- rte .. " � =n���'.3�'.'�'r� .. ��",•--�,.�` A -,mss '•i a No lor WAR a ar y �5 y f 1' s �• f ZZ- Z r _ � '�..:� r� �1;-,�� s��u7T7s3' s� t�','^✓'�'sN r`"�"ii�+� "'�z ;�t,,,y''6�� � S z+'� .,���F�,:-• ���'ss'�ict�i i s m .s,��, -t t7 Ott r Y t ��` l�`���1-?' . • ti �`Ai. YS'. `� �r K '� ; _;Cz�_yJ¢�f { *,an�` u C•r �* •�, � SSS t �' S' ' r moi^ a y 1 c^al+,��� �.'••f-,tyL`a�.,a�ti�,-'[t yr k � ` � to �+`• ?, ; r` ��� r ���' ��� .�7 ems; '� * i�L �r `t�r � a.I t� F �n �w ."�,✓y �� p�� "�`i!y��'s-y'� � a",.� y, jy't;- #^L � � ��� �* -'�� r �t� ', Vii. r �E t `•i {wy �� x� �j� +-� M i� c,. •r ��-` r� r� ;h y. t '•�} �:' �fh i• :a � L'S'D r s �n �'{� � €x.'" -� �� �:� �. � ' f� •n,.fika.`F�tb'��� � 'r t-',Fy' r. T h �� � ✓. ,*'�rlat i k..a�� c �;. of �.ti 4 - .•y:s^�`t t { } - i' L fa F��� �•Ai„�'l.. y e .s is ,� -e;i• �'� '�° t �, �e ��. K^`. t r �'�a1✓a � ` r'� ' ; 4 � k �. � �, rye � > 'SF st )� �t '.. �r t�-���. 7 t yi 1 i � "f `�-� t •.,��.�tr/���,'t�� �z L � �t � ' yr-Y � � "F'i ,� y r k � . r;j-a� ✓� � _ ��x�.. L � IRwt. � f`. Y ,` � ski +,' + FISHERS ISLAND 50 22 SOUND22 34 29 46 28 31 36 _�1 WF PROPERTY OF 3+ e .JAB9W LTD.PARTNERSHIP24 at S ;A 4o Com' 1 f...�r� ,o •,�•.-F! .rG:;>;, .^,1'tt`�",..t' ,,14,.:.��t�°'C=i{v���ii � �'i3 5 UND •',- .;\ j ` � .........� '•rwrGl�l 1••'• uo j '�'.. f.,C. ;- .0.055. ...''•';. •.... ..:......CKAFtr:13214 :::::•. :. _ GRAPHIC SCALE ^PROJECT•DOCK 2000 O9J YARDS REGONSTIZLJCTION "�"�':~ ''•;�`'�'-'"sf, y 1.ELEVATION DATUM IS MEAN LOW WATER(MLW} 1 TIDE DATA 15 TAKEN FROM 2018 NOAA TIDE 17 TABLES, :S1-VER E COVE BASED ON NEW LONDON.Cr. ?;,YS i ~!f • .rr��<' S.PROJECT DESG'RIPnOM MAINTAIN ViL•F OFPfc/r 1 .r !te. �Vrrin-�x;'d.::R oars,8-FT WIDE FD® IES,WOOD POF WHICH -�,' `r �1..�� ;t �-J• f; 120:LF 15 wATERWARD OF THE AHWINCW L. DING THF- INSTALLATION HEINSTAL ATION OF THIN TWO NEW PIER SUPPORT PILES,MAIN'TA1N THE LANDWARD-MOST ,� •s �F;�.,-f��°; r`�.:.,.� ti;� :`���+ STTO,�N1349LILIED�yTIMBER /P�II�RSSUyP�PGOIR�TGyR�I�BT�AND r�� �:,-.. :�� •••�tr��^=�. �.�` ,'`'" IBJ avis THE OUTM 10ST FOUR SIJPPOIZ CRIB �•',,,••�t.•••.•�'t•'tit•S�s�Z�r••'�i•:�a'.�.f:a-ti w°i"•i�•t TIMBERS.REPLACE THREE TE-CM PILES AND INSTALL ONE NEW T16-OFF PLF,ALL AT AND WATERWARD OF y" THE APPARENT HIGH TIDE UNE IN OPEN WATERS OF FSHERS LOA-AND 50UND. 4,PROJECT PURPOSE FISHL�R� ISLAND THIS IS,A PRIVATE DOCK FOR RECRFATK NAL TOWN of 4=(=)Lj LLQ BOATING. 5.THESE APPLICATION DRAWINGS REPRESENT A COMPILATION OF 5URV1=YS,FOR ENVIRONMENTAL " - PERMIT PIJRP09E5-THEY ARE NOT CONSTRUCTION 6.ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: . . CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.A TOWN BUILDING PERMiT NORT}# y MAY BE REQUIRE. MR J G®DIS PARSONS sount PARSONS CAPITAL MANACvE'•IENT INC. ROCKY LEDGE PARTNERS LLC: 10 WE`(BOSSET ST.SM 1000 PO BOX 91 PROVIDENCE.M 02903 MONTGHANIN,DE 19710.0091 OWPM SCALE 1'■200' pRouEm DOCK MAINTENANCE 200 100 0 200 0� L.00A110M FS IIERS BLAND-TOWN oFSOUT•COLD SUFFOLK,COUNTY,NEW YORK, KEI r � WATHZN/AY: �50UNDCATM O C I O - �} p APRJGAM LO-19 FINY.LIZ .r n w AGENT- SHIFT 1 OF 3 _ ,q 0e8692.% �� O ®, INC. ��,O �9oF� r cow SS10aAV �8939 FAX 860 572 7569 DWG-09-2876 E`1AIL•coram kerth 13 Neilscn Drxl:e Inc 9/13/2018 255 PM Gcs5-PUrg PermtrAB dMg A mom N F'm'�mmN FISHERS ISLAND SOUND 0 172 x_1.6 x2! 4f xna xl¢ ► I I I I 1 � � E 49TING Tr*CF:F RLE TO 1 x_T, x_SI oFE9.GRASG/` 1 \ NEW MST1NG& WfDE FD® I Fi'i WOOD PER w0h RAMS TO 66 j _2 BE MAMANED Mlq I I I COSTING SUPPORr POST/ LE x_,. P N r l I I 11 1 rO BE REPLACED / \ s AVERAGE HIGH ! I I I I 1 x_T6 �/� , �I r x_2 ,/` x_1� WATE�i3.6s1 J ( i r Iso 11 /AREA x_"1 Y I-z6 r I/ / 1,6 \ M OF E8. _ 1 1 I . / x.s s S B; 1 lZe I GRASS 1// � l71 NEWPIER \ /-ISO VPFC*RTPILE - xas I / (n'p1 I ZlntFr � MEAN k� I I r • �� DaSTIIVG ro-ow RLE55 r0 I �w`►►TER 25t 1 I I P REr�vwRERLACE 1 I 'E4257M STONE FILLED I I I ' j I C-1099 RB4avVs9 ( ; TBNmR GRB ro BE E�5TlIYG STONE Fltl®'-� ► I I ► � �, I C;w TMBBR ,SCE wrt ALE I '°� � 1 SUPPORM(TYPaf -�' 1- �, I 1 IV MEAN LOW WA1MA l I ,ApPRO�MATE -t9 X_ , xat -: -� AREA x_ , -2� x_I, I I jOF r�19 x-92 I I I CRASS I 111 "- ''•e ., `;• =.•. / 1 xa5KEY X-14 Q E' , •• - AREA OF EEi El CRASSROCKY USE;�N/F PROPEIZIY OF• I:PAI�1Nr� . I.M. PL.AIV �/1LG�7e/ SURVEY by.1N'M BB2NARD0 LAND SURVEYNG LLC -GRAA'IC.SGN.b 1'■30' ELFVAMONS ARE BASED ON MEAN LOW WATB2(M " 30 s I musrcm DOCK MAINTENANCE 1AALOCAMN: Fla ERBFSLAP-V-TOWN ofSOUTHOLA KE H WATERWAY: RSFMS fSLAND SOUND DATE .1PNLIAR a.M 9 0 C X 0 p ¢ APPUC.APdT L 0'V9 FINY.LLC .r n 1 w AGETR�+V SHEET 2OF3 088692. `a DOCKO, INC. '�►^ wo A`�OFESSIO��� 0 R Po R Q► 860 572 8939 FAX 860 572 7569 DWG 11-09-2570 EMAL oftogdock0imm Keith B Nelson.0ccko Inc 9/13/2018 254 PM Goss Kling PermFt-2B dwg IN TS\&W FOR CL.ARrY OF FM AM ffS COMPONa4M EASTNG PALS CM') 3 o io NEW PIER 5UFP0)Zr PILE MP BLEV4&FTABOVE DECK Mop) FLL M 11 IGSMR IRA TO BE MAWAWW w 0.0 NEW PER SUPPO)Zr r FDW WOOD PER REMOVE STONE FLJ-W CRS TO BE MTANW GM i PILE 70Pa.EVA'nCN WASIM MV) 77MBER5REPLACE v#ft PILE 4*FT,ABOVE DECK (n'P of4) I t =-= I, W 251s i --- i, ! - _ .W OA --st'k -41 N01M CFAXS) ry NarSHOWN INEMSTING 8--PT WIDE THIS VEW FOR WOOD PIER TO BE RETAINED NG PALS 70-OFF CLAWYCIF ad MAJNTAPED MriF) PILE TO BE PERAND ffS I-WINTAN C421PONENM NEW PIER SUPPORT FENCEMM;AT -roREPLACEDp EL PILE TOP EL 4dkFT- END OF PER i 17*Fr(nl:) ABOVE DECK —HTL302— MFW 2-% —MLWo.o- — SpLrr CLAMP aid epAss ......... BRACING M-P) MATE GRADE--�`, 8 VATK)vGARESAaDori MEM LOW WATER (ML\" MAPHCSCALS 1"=10* PRojrzcr- COCK MANTOWWCE LOCAMON: FSHERSsAo-TOWN OFSOUTHOLD SLFFaX COUNM NEW �4 0 heY KE WATERWAY- F&IMS SLAW SOLND YOFIK CXAM JANUARY a 2018 AppLjCANT- Lcmrvpwluz Lu o SHEETIVIG. cKa, Ka%&NebM FE 0 Po 8572 cr oas!5 8W 89W FAx eeo57:2 75W DWG V-0-0-2870 EMAIL-offlce9dodw4am ke-th B Neilsom Docks Irc 9/13/20143 253 PM Ocss_Rlirg Permrr-3B dg D O c ko! Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:office@docko.com May 3, 2019 i Mr. Michael J. Domino, President �{! �i, NA - 2019 1>> Town of Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall Annex -- -- ---- ----�-- Soutf:r.'�i Y,!•gin 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Re: Goss Family Dock LCMG FINY, LLC Application Dear Mr. Domino: r We are pleased to transmit herewith revised application drawings for the maintenance and reconstruction of the Goss family dock facility in West Harbor on Fishers Island. These drawings have been revised to reflect the terms and conditions of our recent discussions with you and with the New York DEC. The following revisions are reflected in these drawings: • The cribs will be removed, including timbers and half of the stone, and be disposed of offsite. • The remaining stone at each crib location will be left in a stable mound to preserve habitat. 12-inch Class B piles will be utilized for support of the pier for its full length. • ThruFlow decking will be installed for the full level length of the structure over water. This will enhance the suitability of the benthos and water column to support growth of eelgrass. • The transitional slope section of the pier from the mainland bluff will be extended to meet standard 1:10 maximum gradient. This transitional slope modification will increase the clearance between the deck support stringers and the rocky beach over which the transition section passes. This will provide 5 feet of clearance, adequate for pedestrian access along the beach as discussed during our field visit in February. • Rails are shown to be installed along the edge of the 8-foot wide pier with ladders at strategic locations along the length of the pier and bumpers/fenders at the end of the pier, as before. Mr. Michael J. Domino Page 2 May 3, 2019 • One existing tie-off pile will be relocated from eelgrass bed to an area devoid of eelgrass as depicted in our survey. I believe that this takes care of all of the issues that we had discussed in our site visit and that arose during my presentation of the project to the Board in the March meeting. I have spoken with Mr. Mark Terry regarding the LWRP criteria with specific regard to criteria for the coastal erosion zone. This pier is more than 200 square feet in coverage and that should not have to be changed. This dock facility has existed since 1956 and pre-existed all current regulatory permitting programs except the US ALOE, however, the pier does pre-exist the 1968 "grandfather" date and so is considered compliant as if it was permitted. The modifications that we have made herein otherwise comply with current federal policies. I trust that all of this will prove acceptable during your field visit review next week. Please let me know if the need for any further discussion arises. Your assistance, as always, is greatly appreciated. Yours truly, DOCKO, INC. AeithB. eilson, P.E. KBN:ls Enclosures File: 17-09-2876 GOSS VIA FEDEX Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Docko Office <Office@docko.com> Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 4:16 PM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth Subject: FW: Goss Family Dock, LCMG FINY, LLC Application Attachments: img-190502154607.pdf From: Keith Neilson<keithbneilson@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, May 02, 2019 3:44 PM To: Docko Office<Office@docko.com> Subject: Goss Family Dock, LCMG FINY, LLC Application Dear Mr. Domino, We are pleased to transmit herewith, revised application drawings for the maintenance and reconstruction of the Goss family dock facility in West Harbor on Fishers Island. These drawings have been revised to reflect the terms and conditions of our recent discussions with you and with the New York DEC.The following revisions are reflected in these drawings: *the cribs will be removed, including timbers and half of the stone, and be disposed of offsite. *The remaining stone at each crib location will be left in a stable mound to preserve habitat. 12 Inch Class B piles will be utilized for support of the pier for its full length. *Thru-flow decking will be installed for the full level length of the structure over water.This will enhance the suitability of the benthos and water column to support growth of eel grass. *The transitional slope section of the pier,from the mainland bluff will be extended to meet standard 1:10 maximum gradient.This transitional slope modification will increase the clearance between the deck support stringers and the Rocky beach over which the transition section passes.This will provide 5 feet of clearance, adequate for pedestrian access along the beach as discussed during our field visit in February. *Rails are shown to be installed along the edge of the 8 foot wide pier with ladders at strategic locations along the length of the pier, and bumpers/fenders at the end of the pier, as before. *One existing tile off pile will be relocated from eel grass bed to an area devoid of eel grass as depicted in our survey. I believe that this takes care of all of the issues that we had discussed in our site visit and that arose during my presentation of the project to the Board in the March meeting. I have spoken with Mr. Mark Terry regarding the LWRP criteria,with specific regard to criteria for the coastal erosion zone.This pier is more than 200 square feet in coverage and that should not have to be changed.This dock facility has existed since 1956 and pre-existed all current regulatory permitting programs except the US ACE, however, the pier does pre-exist the 1968 "grandfather" date and so is considered compliant as if it was permitted.The modifications that we have made herein otherwise comply with current federal policies. 1 I trust that all of this will prove acceptable during your field visit review next week. Please let me know of the need for any further discussion arises.Your assistance as always is greatly appreciated. Very truly yours, Docko, Inc, Keith Neilson, P E 2 OFFICE LOCATION: � MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex ® P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Aw Southold,NY 11971Telephone: 631 765-1938 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Michael Domino, President :- Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Date: March 19, 2019 Re: Request for a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit for LCMG FINY, LLC, c/o LESLIE GOSS SCTM# 1000-2-1-14.1 Docko, Inc. on behalf of LCMG FINY, LLC, c/o LESLIE GOSS requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to retain and reconstruct±151 linear feet of existing 8' wide fixed wood pier with handrails on each side, of which ±120 linear feet is waterward of the AHWL; install 32 new pier support piles; maintain the landward most stone-filled timber pier support crib; remove the outermost four (4) support crib timbers; replace three (3) tie-off piles and install one (1) new tie-off pile. Located: 3773 Clay Point Road, Fishers Island. SCTM# 1000-2-1-14.1 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the action is INCONSISTENT with the below listed Policy Standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with LWRP. 4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards. The following management measures to minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards are suggested.- A. uggested.A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding and erosion hazards. The proposed dock structure is within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area (CEHA). All development is prohibited in the nearshore area pursuant to § 111-11. unless specifically provided for by Chapter 111, COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREAS. Pursuant to § 111-6, allowable activities in these areas may include open timber piles or other similar open work supports with a top surface area of less than 200 square feet which are removed in the fall of each year. The proposed action is prohibited in the nearshore area pursuant to Chapter 111, COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREAS as it is not removable. § 111-6. Definitions. UNREGULATED ACTIVITY --Excepted activities which are not regulated by this chapter include but are not limited to elevated walkways or stairways constructed solely for pedestrian use and built by an individual property owner for the limited purposes of providing noncommercial access to the beach; docks, piers, wharves or structures built on floats, columns, open timber piles or other similar open work supports with a top surface area of less than 200 square feet or which are removed in the fall of each year;normal beach grooming or cleanup; maintenance of structures when normal and customary and/or in compliance with an approved maintenance program;planting vegetation and sand fencing so as to stabilize or entrap sand in primary dune and secondary dune areas in order to maintain or increase the height and width of dunes; routine agricultural operations, including cultivation or harvesting; and the implementation of practices recommended in a soil and water conservation plan as defined in § 3, Subsection (12), of the Soil and Water Conservation Districts Law;provided, however, that agricultural operations and implementation of practices will not be construed to include any activity that involves the construction or placement of a structure. 6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands. A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southold Town Board of Trustees laws and regulations for all Andros Patent and other lands under their jurisdiction 1. Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth in Trustee permit conditions. It is recommended the Board assess the dock structure to § 275-11 Construction and operation standards C. 2 (d) of the Southold Town Code; in particular: [6] Whether the dock will cause habitat fragmentation and loss of significant coastal fish and wildlife habitats; The dock structure is proposed in the New York State Significant Coastal and Fish and Widlife Habitat Area/ NYSDEC Critical Environmental Area. At the discretion of the Board of Trustees, any operations proposed in critical environmental areas (§ 275-2) may be subject to more stringent requirements than detailed in this section. Such requirements may include, but are not limited to, denial of certain operations, shortening or reducing the size of structures, and increasing the width of non-disturbance buffers. Alteration of tidal patterns in the Fishers Island Beaches, Pine Islands, and Shallows habitat could have negative impacts on the fish and wildlife communities present. Construction of shoreline structures, such as docks and piers in areas not previously disturbed by development may result in the loss of productive areas which support the fish and wildlife resources of the Fishers Island Beaches, Pine Islands, and Shallows habitat. Unrestricted use of motorized vessels including personal watercraft in the protected, shallow waters of this habitat can have adverse effects on aquatic vegetation and fish and wildlife populations. Use of motorized vessels should be controlled (e.g., no wake zones, speed zones, zones of exclusion) in and adjacent to the area's shallow waters and vegetated wetlands. Eelgrass beds are particularly sensitive to alterations in water quality parameters including temperature, salinity, light penetration, organic matter concentration, and the presence of pollutants. Docks may be detrimental to eelgrass beds because of shading, and review of any proposed new docks in this habitat area should be conducted with potential impacts to eelgrass beds fully considered. (NYSDOS) [7] Whether the dock will result in the destruction of or prevent the growth of vegetated wetlands, seagrasses including eelgrass (Zosters marina) and widgeon grass (Ruppia maritima) or shellfish; The occurrence of eelgrass is documented in the area where the dock structure is proposed. [11] Whether the cumulative impacts of a residential and commercial dock will change the waterway or the environment and whether alternate design, construction, and location of the dock will minimize cumulative impacts, and The continued construction of dock structures within a Significant Fish and Wildlife Habitat/Critical Environmental Area will affect the public use of the area and degrade the ecological quality of the area through introduction of contaminants, disruption of marine life habits etc. .... Correspondingly, physical and functional loss to wildlife has been found to occur through the loss and/or impairment of habitat, disruption of habits and migration patterns (structure and activity) and introduction of harmful contaminants. The most common contaminant associated with docks is wood preservatives impregnated into the wood used to prolong the life of a dock. Three trace metals; arsenic, chromium and copper are the most common. These three metals have the greatest potential to increase in estuarine environments from docks (Sanger and Holland 2002). The use of treated materials should be minimized. In the event the action is approved, it is recommended that: 1. That a vegetated buffer be established to mitigate the local impacts from the dock structure to public surface waters and bottomiands. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Damon Hagan, Assistant Town Attorney Peter Young,Chairman ti Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Lauren Standish,Secretary P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 ��/Q1 �` Telephone(631)765-1889 Fax(631)765-1823 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., December 5, 2018 the following recommendation was made: LCMG FINY, LLC C/O Leslie Goss to maintain 151 If. of existing 8' wide fixed wood pier of which 120 If. is waterward of the AHWL, including the installation of 32 new pier support piles, maintain the landward most stone-filled timber pier support crib, and remove the outermost 4 support crib timbers. Replace 3 tie-off piles and install 1 new tie-off pile, all waterward of the apparent high tide line. Located: 3773 Clay Point Rd., Fishers Island. SCTM#2-1-14.1 The CAC did not make an inspection, therefore no recommendation was made. r� A � BOARD OF TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only gFN/ ,. Coastal Erosion Permit Application Wetland Permit Application nDj Administrative Permit i DEC 2 6 Received Application JL1TAp�/� Received Fee: $6 South0d Town Completed Application Incomplete . _ SEQRA Classificat,i/o� Type I_ Type II-1L Unlisted _ Coordination Date:(Date Sent) LWRP Consistency Assessment Form CAC Referral Sent / Date of Inspection Z Receipt of CAC Repo _ Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: X Public Hearing Held: 2-7-1-?Jmjf Resolution: Name of Applicant: LCMG FINY, LLC c/o Leslie Goss Address: (Mailing) 11888 SW Breyman Avenue, Portland, OR 97219 Phone Number: (503)_819-7818 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000-2.-1-14.1 Property Location: 3773 Clay Point Road Fishers Island,NY 06390 (provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: Docko Inc. (If applicable) Address: P. O. Box 421 Mystic Mystic, CT 06355 Phone: (860) 572-8939 1 �5AA C� a�� Board of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet) : 1.1 ACRES Area Zoning: RESIDENTIAL Previous use of property: RESIDENTIAL Intended use of property: RESIDENTIAL Covenants and Restrictions: Yes X No If"Yes",please provide copy. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals Yes X No If"Yes",please provide copy of decision Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? _X No Yes If yes,provide explanation: Project Description(use attachments if necessary) : Retain and reconstruct 151(+/-)LF of existing 8-FT wide fixed wood pier of which 120(+/-)LF is waterward of the AHWL, including the installation of 32 new pier support piles, maintain the landward most stone-filled timber pier support crib, and remove the outermost 4 support crib timbers. Replace 3 tie-off piles and install 1 new tie-off pile, all at and waterward of the Apparent High Tide line in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. Board of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: The project is to retain and reconstruct a pre-1968 pier for recreational boating. Area of wetlands on lot: 1 000 square feet Percent coverage of lot: 1 % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 0-feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 0-feet Does the project involve excavation or filling: —X—No Yes If yes,how much material will be excavated? cubic yards How much material will be filled? cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations:_ Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Statement of the effect,if any,on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations(use attachments if appropriate): Stone from the existing cribs is resting on the bottom at this time and will continue to do so. The removal of the crib timbers will diminish shading and make way for improved waterflow and circulation,however,the lesser profile of the pile supports means that there will be less wave protection for the shore. E DEC 2 6 26 Southold TOM Board of Trustees Board of Trustees Application ®EC 26 20*2 L COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA ia,;r:,a FI;i�la;t�es Purposes of proposed activity: The project is to retain and reconstruct a pre-1968 pier for recreational boating. Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? No X Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? _X No Yes If Yes,now much material will be excavated? (cubic yards) How much material will be filled? (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts to the subject property or neighboring properties reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed, including erosion increase or adverse effects on natural protective features.(Use attachments if necessary): The pier retention, repair, reconstruction and crib removal for the LCMG FINY, LLC recreational boating facility has been laid out and configured so as to_be the same footprint as the pier which has existed for decades, consistent with the DEC permit requirements for such structures and in accordance with recommendations of the Marine Habitat Protection Bureau offered during the workshop pre-application. There was no tidal wetlands vegetation on the beach beneath the pier; there is very little tidal wetlands on this rocky beach, in any case, because of the open exposure to waves and abrupt toe of the bank which is overgrown with vines and brush. The pier has been configured high, over submerged aquatic vegetation which has grown around the pier in the shallow subtidal waters. As such, it provides adequate height to clear environmental resources of concern and the materials to be utilized are consistent with Town of Southold's Local Law #6 regarding environmental quality and bot using pressure- treated Southern Yellow Pine timber decking components in particular. Pier reconstruction and maintenance work will have no adverse impacts on air quality as a result of this structure and the work on the pier should not diminish overall environmental considerations in Fishers Island Sound. The area of pile contact on the bottom sediments is less than 30 SF. t � t Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 -Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information LCMG FINY,LLC Name of Action or Project: IN ED 2 6M Dock Reconstruction Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): Southold Tmni 3773 Clay Point Road Brief Description of Proposed Action: The proposed project is to retain and reconstruct 151(+/-)LF of existing 8-FT wide fixed wood pier,of which 1202(+/-)LF is waterward of the AHWL, including the installation of 32 new support piles, maintain the landward most stone filled timber pier support crib and remove the outermost 4 support crib timbers. Replace 3 tie-off piles and install 1 new tie-off pile,all at and waterward of the Apparent High Tide Line in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: (503)819-7818 LCMG FINY,LLC E-Mail: Address: 11888 SW Breyman Avenue City/PO: State: Zip Code: Portland I OR 97219 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that ® ❑ may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: Fo NYSDOS, USACOE, NYSDEC,Town of Southold 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 1.09 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 01 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 1.09acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban �Z Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial RResidential(suburban) [>�Forest ❑Agriculture 5aAquatic ❑Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 3 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES I N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ 2 1 ❑ b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ❑ ® ❑ 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? ❑ 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify:There is eel grass growing around the existing pier as shown in the application ® F-1drawings/surveys. 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? 9 ❑ c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? ❑ 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: F]This project will not have significant energy demands even with electric utilities and lights. 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: ❑ A water line(conduit)maybe run out the pier. 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ❑ No water treatment, none required. 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? ❑ b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ❑ b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? ❑ If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: The exising longstanding,crib supported.wood timber pier has existed at this site since the 1950's and will be maintained in its current length,width, and height or usage. 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: 5a Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional 5a Wetland ❑Urban to Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered?There is eel grass growing along in a band along the shore and around the pier ❑ 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES Yes,the dock is in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑NO ❑YES ❑ b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,;biief -.- scn e: { ii: ❑NO []YES (j Page 2 of 3 Soutiiaid (own and of 1r s ees 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: ® F] 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: 20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: ® ❑ I AFFIRM TIIAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ]�'`,,,, p ApplicantJspon name: LCMG N LLC L£S j d$S Date: QC`�oqf- Signature: t' W F ' E0 �1E ID 26 2018 Page 3 of 3 - Board' o,Id iosm Board'of 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: ❑ ❑ 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: ❑ ❑ 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: ❑ ❑ I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: Date: Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part I and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning El Elregulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? ❑ ❑ 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? ❑ ❑ 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the ❑ ❑ establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse•change in the existing level of traffic or ❑ ❑ affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate ❑ ❑ reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: ❑ ❑ a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? ❑ ❑ 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, ❑ ❑ architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, ❑ ❑ waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage ❑ ❑ problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. F1Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Town of Southold-Board of Trustees Name of Lead Agency Date President Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT Page 4 of 4 i 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full FAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action maybe significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. Thefull EAFis intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE— Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 17' Part 1 17 Part 2 Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: 17 A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ®C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may h sla si�nifi,FantiitppLctkbn environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. i �i ` *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions DEC 2 6 2018 i Dock Reconstruction i Name of Action SoutlorldTown B ar of Trusty s Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) website Date PART 1--PROJECT INFORM ATL__.2l Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Dock Reconstruction Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) 3773 Clay Point Road, Fishers Island, NY Name of Applicant/Sponsor LCMG FINY, LLC Address 11888 SW Breyman Avenue City/PO Portland State OR Zip Code 97219 Business Telephone (503)819-7818 Name of Owner(if different) Address City/PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: The proposed project is to retain and reconstruct 151(+/-)LF of existing 8-FT wide fixed wood pier, of which 120(+/-)LF is waterward of the AHWL,including the installation of 32 new pier support piles, maintain the landward most stone filled timber pier support crib,and remove the outermost 4 support crib timbers. Replace 3 tie-off piles and install 1 new tie-off pile,all at and waterward of the Apparent High Tide line in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. J "0 EC 2 6 2018 II3 L _--- Sout�,aid Town Board of Trustees lI Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use:[:]Urban ©Industrial F1 Commercial Residential (suburban) ®Rural (non-farm) ©Forest ®Agriculture &Other Coastal Shoreline 2. Total acreage of project area: 0.03 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0.5 acres 0.5 acres Forested 0.6 acres 0.6 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads,,buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other(Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Gravel a. Soil drainage: Well drained 100% of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site. ®Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil p"hrflugla-4-of-tlie Al _ Classification System?_acres see 1 NYCRR 370 . " } V 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ® Yes ® No J � DEC 262018 a. What is depth to bedrock 80 (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 5oRmid To-,yn boar ofli'fstees ®0-10% % M10- 15% % ® 15% or greater 6. Is project substantiall contiguous to or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes 9 No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ®Yes RNo g. What is the depth of the water table? 10(in feet) g. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ®Yes W No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ®Yes No { r 11. Does project site contain any .N iies of plant or animal life that is identified as�,ui{_ylitened or endangered? 17Yes No According to: Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? E]Yes ®No Describe: The site is a wooded lot with an open meadow in the middle.The shoreline is a coastal NO, heavily vegetated with a moderately steel slope shore into the gravely, rocky intertidal and shallow subtidal waters. 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Yes ®No If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? E]Yes RNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Not Applicable 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: No lake, pond or wetland within the project area. rte= I ; � fl DEC 2 6 2018 ID b. Size (in acres): Board of Trustees 17. Is the site served by existing'public utilities? ®Yes ❑No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? RYes rNo b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? riYes E]No 18. Is the site located inan agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ®Yes to No 19. Is the site located in or substantial) contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ©Yes to No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Yes No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 1.09 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 0.01 acres initially; 0.01 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 1.08 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: 150FT(if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. 0% f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0; proposed 0 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 0(upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family, Multiple Family Condominium Initially No house on site Ultimately No house planned i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 6-FT height; a-FT width; 151(+/-1 length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.)will be removed from the site? N/Atons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed ®Yes ®No ®N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? r1 �� ,r_ Site reclamation is not a part of this project. E y I i E DEC 2 6 2018 I b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®Yes No Soutlold T�,vn __ )�rf101_IILStF9S c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®Yes No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? N/A acres. l 5. Will any mature forest (over 1 UV,years old) or other locally-important vegetatio.-.-oV'removed by this project? Yes 1;7 No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 1 months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 1 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: 04 month 2019 year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: 05 month 2019 year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 0 Yes iz No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes rN7 No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 3; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project N/A 11 . Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?©Yes to No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ®Yes �No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? M Yes M No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal?®Yes r%7 No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ®Yes ®No —, ��((� � 7 PD, ��J ori-, �L� � 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ®Yes 1 No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons DEC 2 6 201 b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ®Yes 17 No i Southold Town c. If yes, give name location Board of Trustees d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ®Yes 0 No e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes &No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? 3 tong tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes RNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ®Yes No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ®Yes MNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ❑Yes 2 No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total per usage anticipated water da i I i p 9 P Y N/A gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ®Yes R No DEC 2 6 2018 i If yes, explain: Su�tl�i��lu'T,n Brod lruslees 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date Town of Southold City, Town, Village Board &Yes ❑No Board of Trustees City, Town, Village Planning Board ❑Yes ❑ No City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ❑ No City, County Health Department 17 Yes ❑ No Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ❑ No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ❑ No NYSDEC August 2018 ' State Agencies Yes ❑ No US ACOE August 2018 Federal Agencies �Yes ®No 11 DEC 2 6 2018 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Yes � No �__._.____ Scuiii:�la Tavan If Yes, indicate decision required: Ua_1 ofLULLOes ® Zoning amendment ® Zoning variance ® New/revision of master plan ® Subdivision ® Site plan 17 Special use permit ❑Resource management plan ® Other 2. What is the zoning classific�...;'E(s) of the site? Residential 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Single Family Residence 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? Residential 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Not Applicable 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? MYes MNo 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a'/a mile radius of proposed action? All the land use to the east, north and south of the site is residential. DEC 2 6 2018 5outtiold Ter, Boar of Trustae S. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a'A mile? DQYes ®No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? 0 Yes 0 No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? MYes R No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? 0 Yes r7 No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes R No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. E]Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name LCMG FINY,LLC Date Signature C l�/ �' (,�G p�<<f- Lc rl N LZG Title Applicant/Co-Owner If the action Is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. � E EQ � D EC 2 6 2018 Sou`ha(d Town Board of Tristees ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONA tE This is intended to supplement ENG Form 4345, Application for Department of the Army Permit, or the Joint Application for Permit used in the State of New York. Please provide complete answers to all questions below which are relevant to your project. Any answers may be continued on separate-sheets) of paper to be-attached to this form. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT The purpose of this form is to provide the Corps of Engineers with basic information regarding your project. This information will be used to facilitate evaluation of your permit application and for public dissemination as required by regulation. Failure to provide complete information may result in your application being declared incomplete for processing, thereby delaying processing of your application. GENERAL-APPLICABLE TO ALL PROJECTS 1. Explain the need for, and purpose of, the proposed work. The proposed project is to retain and reconstruct 151(+/-)LF of existing 8-FT wide fixed wood pier, of which 120(+/-)LF is waterward of the AHWL, including the installation of 32 new pier support piles, maintain the landward most stone filled timber pier support crib, and remove the outermost 4 support crib timbers. Replace 3 tie- off piles and install 1 new tie-off pile, all at and waterward of the Apparent High Tide Line in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. 2. Provide the names and addresses of property owners adjacent to your work site (if not shown on the application form or project drawings). Mr. J Geddis Parsons, Parsons Capital Management Inc., 10 Weybosset Street, Suite 1000, Providence, RI 02903. Rocky Ledge Partners, LLC., P.O. Box 91, Montchanin, DE 19710-0091. DEC 2 6 2018 Souti dal Tai n Boat 0.of Trustees (Please note that depending upon the nature and extent of your project, you may be requested to provide the names and addresses of additional property owners proximate to your project site to ensure proper coordination.) 3. Photographs of the project site should be submitted. For projects in tidal areas, photographs of the waterway vicinity should be taken at low tide. Using a separate copy of your plan view, indicate the location and direction of each photograph as well as the date and time at which the photograph- was taken. Provide a sufficient number of photographs so as to provide a clear understanding of conditions on and proximate to your project site. See attached photos. 4. Provide a copy oi,, M'V environmental impact statemei, ,r any other environmental report which was prepared for your project. Attached are copies of the Short and long form Environmental Review Assessment for this maintenance project. 5. Provide a thorough discussion of alternatives to your proposal. This discussion should include, but not necessarily be limited to, the "no action" alternative and alternative(s) resulting in less disturbance to waters of the United States. For filling projects in waters of the United States, including wetlands,your alternatives discussion should demonstrate that there are no practicable alternatives to your-proposed filling and that your project meets with current mitigation policy(i.e-. avoidance, minimization and compensation). DFS' 2 6 2018 DREDGING PROJECTS Answer the following if your project involves dredging. 1. Indicate the estimated volume of material to be dredged and the depth (below mean low water) to which dredging would occur. Would there be overdepth dredging? There is no dredging associated with this project. 2. You can apply for a ten-year permit for maintenance dredging. If you wish to apply for a ten-year permit, please provide the number of additional dredging events during the ten-year life of the permit and the amount of material to be removed during future events. 3. Indicate of your drawings the dewatering area (if applicable) and disposal site for the dredged material(except landfill sites). Submit a sufficient number of photographs of the dewatering and disposal sites as applicable so as to provide a clear indication of existing conditions. For ten-year maintenance dredging permits, indicate the dewatering/disposal sites for future dredging events, if known. 4. Describe the method of dredging(i.e. clamshell, dragline, etc.) and the expected duration of dredging. 5. Indicate the physical nature of the material to be dredged(i.e. sand, silt, clay, etc.) and provide estimated percentages of the various constituents if available. For beach nourishment projects, grain size analysis data is required. 6. Describe the method of dredged material containment (i.e. hay bales, embankment, bulkhead, etc.) and whether return flow from the dewatering/disposal site would reenter any waterway. Also indicate if there would be any barge overflow. MOORING FACILITIES Answer the following if your project includes the construction or rehabilitation of recreational mooring facilities. 1. It is generally recommended that any fixed piers and walk ramps be limited to four feet in width, and that floats be-limited to eight feet in width and rest at least two feet above the waterway bottom at mean low water. Terminal floats at private, non- commercial facilities should be limited to 29 feet in length. If you do not believe your proposal can meet with these recommendations, please provide the reason(s). The pier is 8-FT wide and 151(+/-)FT long with no floating dock complying with all of these conditions except width. The pier has existed in this configuration since before December 16, 1968. DEC 2 6 2018 Saudn,id Tuvrn Rno rdoFTr,+t 2. Using your plan view, show to scale the locatfon(s), position(s) and size(s) (including length,beam and draft)of vessel(s)to be moored at the proposed facility, including those of transient vessel(s) if known. 3. For commercial mooring sites such as marinas, indicate the capacity of the facility and indicate on the plan view the location(s) of any proposed fueling and/or sewage pumpout facilities. If pumpout facilities are not planned, please discuss the rationale below and indicate the distance to the nearest available pumpout station. 4. Indicate on your p" ')view the distance to adjacent ma' structures, if any are proximate and show me locations and dimensions of such-structures. See attached application drawings. D E ril ' DEC 2 6 2018 Sout�o!d Toavn B ar of Trustees 5. Discuss the need(___ eed( ;wave protection at the proposed, )lity. Please be advised that if a permit is issued;';_'u would be required to recogniz���:,at the mooring facility may be subject to wave action from wakes of passing vessels, whose operations would not be required to be modified. Issuance of a permit would not relieve you of ensuring the integrity of the authorized structure(s) and the United States would not be held responsible for damages to the structures) and verse/(s) moored thereto from wakes from passing vessels. There is no good opportunity for wave protection at this site. Waves from the wave field northwesterly to northeasterly of the site are unobstructed in their approach, however, wave boards would tend to over stress the pier structure and so it was felt that the boat should be removed from the site when rough weather approaches and leave the pier supporting piles open and the wave path unobstructed. BULKHEAD/NG/BANK STABILIZA TION/FILLING ACTIVITIES Answer the following if your project inclues construction of bul/fheading(also retaining walls and seawalls) with backfill, filling of waters/wetlands, or any other bank stabilization fills such as riprap, revetments, gabions, etc. 1. Indicate the total volume of fill (including backfill behind a structure such as a bulkhead) as well as the volume of fill to be placed into waters of the United States. The amount of fill in waters of the United States can be determined by calculating the amount of fill to be placed below the plane of spring high tide in tidal areas and below ordinary high water in non-tidal areas. There is no bulkheading/bank stabilizations or filling activity proposed in this dock maintenance application. Z Indicate the source(s) and type(s) of fill material. 3. Indicate the method of fill placement(i.e. by hand, bulldozer, crane, etc.). Would any temporary fills be required in waterways or wetlands to provide access for construction equipment? If so, please indicate the area of such waters and/or wetlands to be filled, and show on the plan and sectional views. There is no fill to be placed. D E CC& E V DEC 262018 Southold Town Board of Trustees The foregoing requi "l basic information on the moi' )moron types of projects requiring Departmene the Army permits. It is intended obviate or reduce the need for requesting additional information; however, additional information may be requested above and beyond what is requested in this form. Please feel free to add any additional information regarding your project which you believe may facilitate our review. Please see the attached narrative. f_JIF) i � N DEC 2 6 2018 Southold T—OT% Board of TrusfceS Board of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York LCMF FINY, LLC-BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE / SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVE(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME Ti S DAY OF 20 L OFFICIAL STAMP VAMEGANMAME WASER NOTARY PUSUCOREGON Nota P lic COMMISSION NO.977033 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 23,2022 to 40 Board of Trustees application AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) I,LCMG FINY,LLC c/o Leslie Goss residing at 3773 Clay Point Road (print owner of property) (mailing address) FISHERS ISLAND, NY do hereby authorize DOCKO, INC. , (Agent) MYSTIC, CT to apply for permit(s) from the Southold Board of Town Trustees on my behalf. /6 - 2 -10 (Owner' s si ature) APPLICANT/AGENTMEPRSENTAAUV9 , TRANSACTIONAL PISCLOSiTRT bRM ' Pup- -,.. eI: ,• -I.._ri - :ni f bt 'co ;�~ _i . °� , �. - pfe�gs;�aila ra itwiii!gamo. ] � , YOUR NAM_ E_ ` (Last Mine,first name,#Oddle initial,unless you are applying lit themime:of i someone else or other entity;^such as a company.if so,indicate the other a person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) ; o Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change ofZone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning. Other (If"Other",name the activity:) ' Do you pers6nidly,(or,through yiiuf`eompany,Spot ,sibling,patent,or chi'Id)have u relafivmsf ipw,ith aqy offii�or cmpinye< ofthe'rown 6ffSouttiald? "Rellt{#on hip"inctud s;by blood,.t arrra oc6usixi fyleirsE"T�Kisincssi►tiet '.1tD a»s,o.fJusliu s; including a partnership,in which the io%wi offa6tor•emp(byee l veil pattipl ojviiet trip"of, t ctnpio tneoEl3y).0 eotiaorati9n' in which the town officer or employee owns,nlorc tlioq, �ti.of th hares. YES NO c If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where Indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title gr position of that person. Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicahtlagent/representative)and the town officer or employee.,Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,-or child is(check all that apply): A),the owner-of greater than:5%ofthe'shnf of die corporate stock of fti;i)p)icnnt (when the applicant is a'aofpo`r-adon); B)the 104 or beneficial' ler of any interest in a non-corporate entit ,(;vhett the appirda nt is not g¢rpt'ration); C)an officer,dlrector,.partnec,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this ay ofW65345 Print Name Form'TS 1 Le "PLICANUAGENUREPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and emgllgyees The purpose of this form is to provide inforination which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. ' YOUR NAME: 6-6 &M '" (Last name,first name,griddle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other'',name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,[marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicantlagcnt/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicerrt (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submittedth' a of 20# Signature , Print Name eA+h$ ne4ISM PL% Form TS 1 1 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Map No. Jabsco Limited Partnership 2.4-13.1 Mr. J. Geddes Parsons 2.4-16.1 Parson Capital Management 10 Weybosset Street, Ste 1000 Providence,RI 02903 LCMG FINY, LLC 2.4-16.3 978 Oyster CT. P.O. Box 1139 Sanibel Island, FL 33957 Rocky Ledge Partners, LLC T-1-1 P.O. Box 91 Montchanin, DE 19710-0091 STATE OF CONNECTICUT COUNTY OF NEW LONDON _DOCKO, INC. , residing at 14 HOLMES STREET, MYSTIC, CT 06355, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 3o4il day of , 20_4, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees App cation, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at MYSTIC, CT, that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (registered)mail. Sworn to before me this of s'f Day of �%�iUC//�/t f , 20 /y Notary Public ' V + , f NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: LCMG FINY, LLC SCTM# 1000-2-1-14.1 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: Retain and reconstruct 151(+/-)LF of existing 8-FT wide fixed wood pier of which 120(+/-)LF is waterward of the AHWL, including the installation of 32 new pier support piles, maintain the landward most stone-filled timber pier support crib, and remove the outermost 4 support crib timbers. Replace 3 tie-off piles and install 1 new tie-off pile, all at and waterward of the Apparent High Tide line in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. 2. That the property which is the subject of Environmental Review is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: 3773 Clay Point Road, Fishers Island, NY 3. That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 32, 37, and/or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment on: DATE: Wednesday February 13, 219 at or about 5:30 am You may contact the Trustees Office at 765-1892 or in writing. The above-referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of ------Southold--and-does-not-reference-any-other-agencythat-might-ITave-to-reviev r-same ---- proposal. PROPERTY OWNERS NAME: LCMG FINY LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 11888 SW Brevman Avenue, Portland, OR 97219 PHONE #: 503) 819-7818 AGENT: Docko, Inc., Keith B. Neilson, P.E. MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 PHONE#: (860) 572-8939 Noonan- T F�,%Srji/(1� i •el`p3 IIS y;.i'{'Wcjy 17 1 'i'9 i•l rr�fY.PC'"l i ���r11.�y _ _ _ ---'_'— NG NU t ICE E A r 1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the Southold Town Board of Trustees atthe Town Hall,53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. OWNERS) OF RECORD: LCMG FINY, LLC, C/o LESLIE GOSS 1 . SUBJECT OF PUBLIC HEARING: For a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to retain and reconstruct±151 linear feet of existing 8' wide fixed wood pier with handrails on each side, of which ±120 linear feet is waterward of theme AHWL; install 32 new pier support piles; maintain the landward most stone-filled timber pier support crib; remove the outermost four (4) support crib timbers; replace three (3)tie-off piles and install one (1) new tie-off pile. Located: 3773 Clay IPoint Road, Fishers Island. SCTM# 1000-2-1-14.1 TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 — at or about 5:30P.M. 1 if you have an interest in this project,you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are 4 available for inspection prior to the day of the hearing during normal business days between t the hours of 8 a.m.and 4 .m. BOARD OF TRUSTEES*TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631) 765-1892 r' ,yd'g�FFD(,� Michael J Domino, President iJ1p�Q �'p�: Town Hall Annex John N1. Biedemeyer III, Vice-President ty'�� Gy�,E� 54375 Route 25 Glenn Goldsmith cm P.O. Box 1179 A.Nicholas Krupski q Southold, NY 11971 Grey Williams y4 pt .r Telephone(63 1)765-1392 Fax (63 l)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUS'T'EES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD --------------------------------------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of LCNIG FINY, LLC, c/o LESLIE GOSS COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING THIS FORM M TO BE COMPLETED AFTER POSTING REMAINS IINr PLACE FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DA YS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DA TE, I, .-.���f)�( / �.Jd�zS>�residin at/dba � �� L,;-S�, L) t'�l� )ZtC,j F7 being duly sworn, depose and say: That on the Q S day of {���00— , 220111 personally posted the property lUlowil as 77 - Z_C9 > --'t 514L--'\-L_1> I__S L,-1,4/ by placing the Board of Trustees official poster where it can easily be seen- and that T have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wednesdav, February 13, 2019. Dated: 2 J 9 l J (si ur Sworn to before me this 12A day of Thi, 2019 ary Public` ' -� Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:office@docko.com February 12, 2019 Mr. Michael J. Domino, President Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall Annex 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: LCMG FINY, LLC Property, Fishers Island Burnham III Property, Fishers Island Dear Mr. Domino: We are transmitting herewith the affidavit of posting for LCMG FINY,LLC and the Burnham project for your file.In addition,I have also included another green return receipt card for the Burnham project. Yours truly, DOCKO, INC. Cindy Bayreuther Administrative Assistant _ SECTIONSENDER;: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS ON DELIVERY 7MPrint plete items 1,2,ai 3. A. Signature v<'�-Gf/Ir ❑Agent your name and adv •ss on the reverse X ?-y/ dr ssee hat we can return the, trd to you. { ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, %bbhe eived by(Printed e) C. ate f D Iivery or on the front if space permits.1. Article Addressed to: is delivery addr s different from item 1 Y s If YES,enter d N ery address below: o 1x15. S�,t�.ce.n C�cu.z.. Scd�csn�1,�lUas;} �,•._ LT` l KBN: cb Enclosure r t mgtm CC: Ms. Leslie Goss I Mr. John Mealy I IIIllill IIII IIIIIII II I II II II III 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Expre ss® El Adult Signature ❑Registered MaFile: 17-09-2876 GOSS � II llil I III ❑Adyt Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mal Restricted 10-10-2239 BURNHAM 9590 9402 3312 7196 3467 53 0<e-rtifedMail@ j Delivery , ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for Cl Collect on Delivery Merchandise ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ElSignature Confirmation""' 2. Article Number("ranter from SBN/Ce 126e1)_ - --_ ---- 0 Insured Mail ❑_Signature Confirmation ,7®18 1,13 0 0000 8475 2975 1:1Insured Mail Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery I (over$500) l PS,Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000,-9053, Domestic Return Receipt nmrwiili� 1111rr-U • �Ln • i �k I[� Certified Mad Fee I%- Certified Mail Fee $ � ^ F-xtra$ervices Fees(check box,ed$d lee es • are $ nate l ":.turn Recelpt(hardcopy) Extra Services&Fees(cheek box,a$fee ) �gp ❑Retum Receipt(electronic) $ Here Q alum Receipt(hardcopy) " zF--tmark Q ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ C3 ❑Return Receipt(elecWnic) $ dTT�1., 11 cc Mag Restricted Delivery $ Q✓"qre tJ� IC3 ❑Adult Signature Required $-� 0 []Adult Signature Required $ r I� Ch ❑Adult Signature Restricted Dellvery$ �cnc 7 Cl Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ eY Postage J 1!' C3 Postage J 1 •r Total postage and FeesIM $ ll IiC •OV � Total postage and Fees U. `q geR4Tn° L --------------------------- cc S t T J--_ e w O et and A .A(o.,or Box No• ------- c ,��-. Sand�p:a r P B ° ------------------------ 4 s 71 -car a A Ct ,Mate,ZI + Ci ate 4 r ^� :ee a eee•, En �' as a ' W o 00 — N m U y `ot¢ v� 1 E c • Q Q O }Z I m p o . c Et n ®� � ° . � � ❑ ❑ � ❑ grim �a��d � .MNydE�mmc U gI'L 65 cc d�mddrnrn N I 01-111 ❑ ❑❑ o ru 0 dr f- Certified Mail Fee e� 3 �I\� TLr rico f- � $ � o c0 ro date J• 1 , a Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee as app ) _ I v m �Retum Receipt(h COPY) $ ,a-) '0 Return Receipt(electronic) $ mark (71❑ Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ -p -'��»•� d O T• ' $a� �w w2� S 0 0 Adult Signature Required $ ®y� y D "c�^- ;"'��'+•✓�' a m m c ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ ! 0 Postage S m d w rn m o o g o Total postage and Fees ren'Qv' rn.W d (�rSU553 $ vc ru ci❑❑[�❑❑❑❑❑- !cc Sento ' C rI1N ��-- ---------n-------------------------------- 17-9 5 C3 St et and A No.,pr PO OR 0. �� I7Q x 1 M U a) (� Q ul (�/® T I fU 0 r e® cq C� _ bELIVERY Ln co O NI A Signa r — T- "' CEICD ® Complete items 1,2,and 3. Agent _— (.0 LSi D-C3 LID _ ® Print your name and address on the reverse X ❑Addressee I o so that we can return the card to you. B. Received by(Printed Name) ateo ive P p >. 1 ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, �I v -, or on the front if space permits. o 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes[3C-® o ,fY 1 �I If YES,enter delivery address below: No a� Q7 V (a, — c 39 c�l r3 - �'- nt Imo. �tC��-•r 4='� ��S'1 �- ------ __�-- II illill IIII I!I I III I II I I II i!III I I II III I II I III 3.❑AdulService gna urre ❑Rg Priority Mail ail TM Exp—s@ ❑Registered Mail TM ❑/ fit Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mall Restricted Berttfied Mall® Delivery 9590 9402 3312 7196 3616 57 ❑Certlfied Mail Restncted Delivery ElR Return Receipt Merchandise for ❑Collect on Deh ❑Signature ConfirmationTM' 2.-Artiole Number_ITransfer_from-service-bbelL ❑Collect an-belivery Restricted Delivery C1nnnture '-r'7abon Aecelpt :PS Foam: I — PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK residing at . being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the day of , 2Q_, deponent mailed a-true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. i Sworn to before me this Day of , 20 I Notary Public NUT-ILL Uim Ht: ARING _ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the Southold Town Board of Trustees at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. OWNER(S) OF RECORD: LCIVIG FINY, LLC, c/o LESLIE GOSS SUBJECT OF PUBLIC HEARING : For a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to retain and reconstruct ±151 linear feet of existing 3' wide fixed wood pier with handrails on each side, of which ±120 linear feet is waterward of the AHWL; install 32 new pier support piles; maintain the landward most stone-filled timber pier support crib; remove the outermost four (4) support crib timbers; replace three (3) tie-off piles and install one (1 ) new tie-off pile. Located: 3773 Clay Point Road, Fishers Island. SCTM## 1000-2-1 -14.1 TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING : Wednesday, February 13, 2019 — at or about 5 :30P. M . If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are available for inspection prior to the day of the hearing during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. BOARD OF TRUSTEES * TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631) 765-1892 Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS I 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for i proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. f 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local t Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Towns 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or"no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website(southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. �4( 1cull _ V B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000 - 2.1 - 14.1 DEC 2 6 2018 PROJECT NAME Dock Reconstruction SoO o?d To-An In The Application has}leen submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees I. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g.capital ❑ construction,planning activity,agency regulation,land transaction) ❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g.grant,loan,subsidy) i (c) Permit,approval,license,certification: ❑ Nature and extent of action: Retain and reconstruct 151(+/-)LF of existing 8-FT wide fixed wood pier of which 120(+/-)LF is waterward of the AHWL,including the installation of 32 new pier support piles, maintain the landward most stone-filled timber pier support crib,and remove the outermost 4 support crib timbers. Replace 3 tie-off piles and install 1 new tie-off pile, all at and waterward of the Apparent High Tide line in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. Location of action: 3773 Point Road, Fishers Island NY 06390 —" Site acreage: 1.1 Acres Present land use: Residential Present zoning classification: Residential 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: LCMG FINY, LLC c/o Leslie Goss (b) Mailing address: 11888 SW Breyman Avenue, Portland. OR 97219 (c) Telephone number:Area Code( } 503-819-7818 (d) Application number,if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes X❑ No❑ If yes,which state or federal agency? NYSDEC and U.S.ACOE C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy I.. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space,makes efficient use of infrastructure,makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. �X Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable The project is to retain and maintain the current dock facilities which have existed at this site since the 1960's. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria 0 ❑ ❑ Not Applicable Yes No �1 DEC 26 2018 J SouiSoid Town —BoardTrustees The dock facility and recreational bc, " ;age and essential transportation to and from .nainland has existed at this site since the 1960's. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation*criteria X❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable The project will maintain the use of the property for recreational boating purposes and maintain the aesthetics of the facility. Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LNM Section III—Policies Pages,8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes F' No 21 Not Applicable Attach additibnal sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold.See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No N Not Applicable The project will not have any affect on suitability of or availability of drinking water on Fishers Island.This project will reduce impacts on water flow and circulation and therefore be considered an improvement to the quality of coastal wa ers. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ® ❑ 'J ❑ �: �, d DEC 2 6 2018 Soufhokl Town Board f Trustees X'Yes No Not-'- Ilicable The proiect does not include any excavation. Existing crib stone will remain and continue to provide water column diversity,shelter for fish and shellfish and wave attenuation for proetecting and preserving existing habitat diversity. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the a Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —PoIicies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ NoX❑ Not Applicable There are no air quality issues related to this prosect. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LAW Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No F)]( Not Applicable There is no solid waste or hazardous substances to be generated from this project. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Ye❑ No© Not Applicable The project is being conducted on private land of the Goss family. The Public Trust Lands and Waters constitutes the area between the Mean High Water line and Mean Low Water line and t e resources are from the High Tide line,out.These environmental resources are being protected by the esignis andatds dictated by the NYSDEC and the U.S.ACOE.This project is consistent with environmental standards set forth in the NYS CAM Act. Attach additional sheets ifnecessary DEC 2 6 2018 1 Southc1d Town Q and of Tr s pe WORHING COAST POLIC; Y Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III,—Policies;Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Q Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable ' l The project and the use of the site are a high priority water-dependent use and have been so since the 1960's and provide a boating ? access point for the Goss family. i 1 Attach additional sheets if necessary ' 1 Policy 11. Promote sustainable, use of living marine resources in Long Island,Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters.See LWRP Section III—Policies;Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. i ❑Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable 4 Please see attached supplemental narratives regarding preservation of the benthos ecosystem for this site and the expected short ; and long-term impacts. The crib filler stone will not be excavated or removed from the site but will remain to foster benthic community ' diversity provIMng r-eYuge for small i n s r Attach additional sheets if necessary ; Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands-in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. j ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable There is no agricultural or aquaculture use at this time and dock maintenance will not create new impacts for shellfish at the site. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Q Not Applicable There are no energy or mineral resources on the site and no adverse impact to any adjacent resources,areas will be avoided by the current industry standards for dock construction sothere will be no new or significant adverse impacts, in any case. are r-- — sp- PREPARED 13Y Keith B.Neilson.P.E. TITLE A gentD cko In�' It, !� �A�'�Ocjobe 3, 2018 u DEC 2 6 201 56f5ld Toyan raw,l of Trwztppk LCMG FINY,LLC FISHERS ISLAND SOUND DEC 2 6 2018 FISHERS ISLAND,NEW YORK NARRATIVE STATEMENT & SUPPLEMENTAL INFO} MATIONSouth.Dld Town FOR NYS DEC,NYS/DOS AND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPJJCATIQZES,f Tru tees August 2018,Revised December 17,2018 GENERAL LCMG FINY, LLC owns parcel 1000-2.-1-14.1 off Clay Point Road a private road, located along the west shore of Clay Point along Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island. The site is generally moderately sloped, sandy gravel soils, vegetated with grass, brush, landscaping ground cover and trees. The frontage of the property is approximately 400 feet along West Harbor at the east shore, abutted by the Mr. J Geddis Parsons property to the north and Rocky Ledge Partners, LLC to the south. The waterfront consists of a partially rock-covered beach with tidal wetlands vegetation at the base of the moderately sloped coastal bluff in the vicinity of the pier. It is LCMG FINY, LLC desire to retain and reconstruct the existing fixed pier dock system but using driven wood piles to replace the deteriorated cribs. Wood cribbing will be removed. The pier will be at an end elevation of 6 feet above Mean Low Water (MLW), sloping upward and crossing over the boulder-strewn intertidal zone above the bottom sediments until reaching a finished elevation of about 10 feet to shore at that elevation, stopping short of the bank where it comes ashore with a ramped section of about 20 foot length which allows passage of the public on the rocky beach below; a rare event. Attached are application drawings prepared for this project showing this configuration and pertinent details. This supplemental narrative has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Town of Southold, Ordinance No. 6, 2004, and the Waterfront Revitalization Program related to docks and shorefront improvements. In addition, various coastal policies under the New York State Coastal Management Act are addressed herein for review by the New York State Department of State and Department of Environmental Conservation. This project is restoration of a longstanding pier and dock facility which has existed since the 1960's before the Town and State permitting programs and before the December 16, 1968 "grandfather"date of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. DESCRIPTION OF WORK As mentioned in the introductory paragraph, this project is to retain a fixed wood pile and timber pier changing the supports from cribs to piles along the shore out into Fishers Island Sound in accordance with existing guidelines set forth in the Town of Southold ordinance No. 6,2004. It is envisioned that this structure will be repaired and rebuilt utilizing the following general sequence and methodology. ➢ The marine contractor will arrive by water with barge-mounted crane and push boats. ➢ New piles will be driven starting at the shore landing end of the pier and proceeding waterward at roughly 10-foot intervals to the waterward end of the pier. These piles will be driven by double- acting air hammer to a bearing capacity of 20 tons and pull-out resistance of approximately 10 tons. This generally requires about twelve to fifteen feet of embedment of the pile in the bearing stratum. Because of the exposure with the prevailing wind westerly wave field, these piles will be 12-inch nominal diameter class B Southern Yellow Pine pressure treated to 2.5 pcf of CCA Type C. ➢ The existing pier will be disassembled, and wood salvaged for disposal in accordance with applicable laws,regulations and ordinances. 1 ➢ After the piles�__, installed, split caps (also referred to u&-.j;lit clamps) consisting of a pair of pressure treated Southern Pine timbers, 4 x 10 to 4 x 12 nominal dimension, will be bolted to the piles transversely forming a pile bent. Stringers will be then laid on the split caps parallel to the length of the pier. In all likelihood, five runs of stringers will be set and will probably consist of 3 x 10 pressure-treated Southern Pine. ➢ The outer stringer on each side will be bolted or spiked to the pile to secure it against wave uplift forces that this pier might be exposed to. ➢ After the stringers have been connected to the piles and split caps, the decking will be installed. In ,accordance with Town of Southold's Ordinance No. 6, 2004, this decking will not be CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine but rather oak, cedar hardwood or plastic / composite such as "Timber Tech" or similar synthetic, composite or plastic material with the brushed side mounted up. If composites-or plastic are used, it will be either gray, brown or natural in color. Decking will be attached to the stringers utilizing galvanized nails or stainless-steel Phillips or flathead square-drive wood screws about 3 inches of stringer penetration and will be set with a 1/" gap between deck planks. If necessary Thru-Flow decking may be used for this project. ➢ The over-water decking will run level at a height of up to eight feet above the existing bottom sediments in the shallow subtidal zone. See Sheet 4 of the application drawings for the pier profile. ➢ The piles will be about 42 inches above the deck surface and support horizontal rail members. ➢ The mid-rail can be timber or cable and both details are shown. ➢ A top rail of cedar, oak,hardwood or Timber Tech material will be installed for safety. ➢ Water and electricity will be run out on the pier in the space between the stringers so that trickle chargers on the boat may be powered during tie-ups. The water will allow boats to be rinsed off after usage. A power post with an internal light will be mounted to the end of the fixed pier with receptacles to provide power to the boats from extension cords. The power post will also have coiling arms for storage of the electric service cord and hose between uses. Because the dock may be used during the hours of darkness, low-intensity lights will be mounted on staggered piles or dock rail posts to illuminate the deck and the walking surface up the bank. This system will be manually, or radio controlled with a shut-off timer so that t wr o y b—e ona w ep necessary for safety of the users. �j 1 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION POLICIES DEC 2 6 201 The Town of Southold, LWRP policies that are applicable t the dock 4'f�9bgff�are a loca refinement of the Long Island Sound Regional Coastal Managemen a f T es throughout Long Island Sound. The Goss site is on the east shore of the West Harbor off Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island and is characterized predominately as undeveloped coast or natural coast. The undeveloped coast policies are applicable as follows: ➢ Policy 1 is to foster a pattern of development that enhances community character and preserves natural resources to the maximum extent and minimizes adverse impacts on the environment, ➢ Policy 2 is to preserve historic resources, ➢ Policy 3 is to enhance and protect scenic resources and visual quality. The pier reconstruction and cribbing removal for LCMG FINY, LLC is consistent with waterfront development on Fishers Island and in coastal areas. The pier is made of suitably-sized timbers which will be replaces with materials allowable under Local Law#6 with due consideration of climatic conditions at the site and replacement components will conform as well. This proposal is consistent with other adjacent dock facilities and characteristics for the visual and scenic considerations. The encroachment is not significant, to be consistent with DEC policies, Southold Local Law #6, US ACOE policies and the structure is as low profile as possible, consistent with the safe and efficient use of the waters and consistent with the tidal and wave exposure of this site. Lighting will be minimal for operational safety and otherwise off, and lights will be operational only when necessary for boating purposes so that during hours of darkness there will be no adverse impact 2 4 NATURAL COAST f �`.�[CIES The Natural Coastal Policies are 4 through 8 and require consideration as follows: ➢ Policy 4—Minimize loss of life, structures and natural resources from flooding and erosion, ➢ Policy 5—Protect and improve water quality ➢ Policy 6—Protect and restore the quality and function of the eco-system, ➢ Policy 7—Protect and improve air quality, ➢ Policy 8 - Minimize environmental degradation primarily from solid waste and hazardous substances. The pier reconstruction and cribbing removal for LCMG FINY, LLC recreational boating facility has been laid out and configured so as to be the same footprint as the pier which has been here for decades, consistent with the DEC permit requirements for such structures and in accordance with recommendations of the Marine Habitat Protection Bureau offered during the workshop pre-application. There was no tidal wetlands vegetation on the beach where the pier begins. The pier will remain high over submerged aquatic vegetation which has grown around the pier in the shallow subtidal waters. As such, it provides adequate height to clear environmental resources of concern and the materials to be utilized are consistent with Town of Southold's Local Law #6 regarding environmental quality and the use of pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine timber components in particular. The us of"Thru Flow" decking will allow approximately 60% of sunlight on the pier to reach the waters below. Pier work will have no adverse impacts on air quality as a result of this structure and the work on the dock should not diminish overall environmental considerations in Fishers Island Sound. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9 sets forth a priority to provide for public access and recreational use of coastal waters, public lands and public resources of the Town. This project maintains a longstanding (decades old) recreational boating facility for the LCMG FINY, LLC property and so is con 'n n r ' , ' y Z WORKING COAST POLICIES The policies of this section relate to the following: DEC 2 6 2018 ➢ Policy 10 — Protection of the Town's water-dependent uses and pro oting new Swat&. epen ent uses in suitable locations, Board of Tri tees ➢ Policy 11 —Promoting sustainable use of living marine resources, ➢ Policy 12—Protect agricultural lands, ➢ Policy 13—Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. While most of the Working Coast Policies are not applicable to this site or this type of project, Policy 10, promoting water-dependent uses and the siting of water-dependent uses in appropriate areas is applicable. The proposed pier reconstruction project makes the most beneficial use of the land and keeping the dock facility in the most appropriate, historic point of the land where access down the bank will not require changes in structural facilities and can be accommodated with path work rather than formal stairs and so on. This project has been laid out with specific reference and review of the Waterfront Revitalization Program policies and is considered to be consistent. In summary, the dock is typical of recreational boating facilities throughout the area and all along coastal New England. The pier structure maintains the same length, width, height, and structure so,as to be consistent with other facilities of a similar nature and the minimum necessary components to accommodate safe and efficient boating operations from this site safely in a variety of climatic conditions. 3 f Pile supports will be uti _=�d instead of cribs and old crib timbers win be removed leaving the stone on the bottom for habitat diversity. This project does not interfere with public access or use of public trust waters and lands of the State, it does not interfere with navigation, it will not create soil or sedimentation erosion problems, it does not adversely environmental resources and in the area where the facility must span the intertidal zone at the shore line, the facility will be maintained in the area of rocks where environmental resources have already acclimated to the pier and boating activity so as not to worsen any of these conditions. The height of the structure has been specifically addressed so as to maintain clearance above the shoreline tidal wetlands plants if other conditions are conducive to such growth. The dock facility reaches out to 4 feet of water in Fisher Island Sound so that dredging will not be an issue in the future, thus further minimizing adverse environmental impacts. More than 95% of the LCMG FINY, LLC shoreline will remain in a natural state as a result of these considerations for design. There is no loss of valuable marine and wetland habitat and no water quality degradation as a result of this project. No natural protective features or processes will be adversely impacted as a result of the maintenance work on the docking facility. Dense growth areas of submerged aquatic vegetation in the proposed dock or berthing area have been avoided. Reference is made to the NYS DEC study from 2000 indicating the suitability of pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine piles and super-structure components for this type of purpose. The piles must be 12-inch diameter due to site exposure. In accordance with Local Law #6, decking for the pier and the approach ramp will be of woods other than Southern Yellow Pine or plastic,. This project is consistent with zoning policies and ordinances for the Town. The dock facility will be an accessory to the home located at this site. There will be no development of the upland related to this dock facility that will create point sources of pollution or drainage. This project is providing recreational boating and water usage opportunities compatible with the natural resource values and characterist _e e. a otcs existing sized for stability considerations especially acknowledging that waves tlemrlh�can�com from Fishers Island Sound and the dock is angled more or less into those waves. LWRD-SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS DEC 2 6 201 'J • Navigation: The proposed dock meets standards of the industry and d es not exten'i']�A'"&ffa 1/3 across the water body. Depths for the dock terminus are within ar of r.. e s York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and United States Army Corps of Engineers guidelines and there is no recognized Federal/New York State/Town navigation channel in the immediate vicinity of the proposed structure. • Scope: The proposed dock is comparable to docks on neighboring properties in an area where docks historically are used for transportation and recreational purposes. • Toxicity:The proposed dock decking shall be constructed entirely of non-toxic materials. • Scope in relation to theriparian rights of shell fishers: The plan promotes a standard full- length fixed pier design that will not impede access for small vessels at low tide, and those seeking shellfish and crustacea on foot or in boats in season. • Scope in relation to the rights of small human powered water craft to navigate the waters adjacent to the proposed structures:At low tide a kayak would be able to paddle beneath the pier and at higher tides paddle at or around this proposed structure at it projects only a hundred feet into the waterbody. • Scope in relation to view sheds: This project is to rebuild a pier that has existed at this site for more than half a century and its length width and height will not change.The seaward end of the proposed dock lies landward of nearby existing docks that frame the view shed. As such the perspective will not be discernibly different from the existing view. • Environmental upkeep: The dock design projects a lifespan of 30 years, and with pile replacement minimizes bottom disturbance. 4 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 97-25 OF THE WETLANDS LAW 6,2004 The permittee acknowledges that the validity of this permit is subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities.- The permittee does, by the acceptance of this permit, assume all responsibility for operations undertaken pursuant to this permit, and shall take all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property resulting from such operations. By such acceptance, the permittee also agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Town and its officers. The permittee gives consent to the Town and its officers, employees and agents to enter upon the premises where such operations are being conducted to make such inspections to determine whether said operations are being conducted in conformity with the permit. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing one week prior to initiation of any and all operations. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing upon completion of operations such that the site can be inspected for issuance for a certificate of compliance. In response to Sub-section 2a and the General Rules for Standards of Residential and Commercial Docks,the following additional information is offered. 1. Permits for the work are being applied for through the Town, US ACOE, NYS DEC and a coastal zone consistency determination by the NYS DOS. 2. The new piles to be installed will be of sturdy, durable and stable materials; in all likelihood, Greenhart, Kakaralli or CCA Type C pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine (SYP) 12-inch diameter class B piles with new split caps and braces of pressure- treated SYP materials. These members will be a minimum of 3 x 8's and more often, 3 x 10's and 4 x 10's with at least one 1-inch bolt per connection, and in other cases, two 3/ inch bolts per connection. This pier is a fixed, pile-supported timber structure and therefore will not adversely o r affect the free circulation of water or reduce the effects of fluctuating water levels in Fishers Island Sound or West Harbor. In addition, the pier does not present any t adverse modification of the shoreline. The pier's end elevation is such that in c j extreme high flood tides the structure will be inundated. The structure's SYP timber o materials represent the standard of the industry being specifically grown a renewable resource for this type of usage and are capable of withstanding full immersion. With the connections described above, this structure will be able to survive repeated inundations and even direct waves at high tide elevations with a structural life of approximately 20 years. 3. This site is exposed to rough sea conditions on a regular basis. The pier support will include driving new 12-inch diameter piles at 10-foot intervals to the maximum extent possible in order to obtain the desired pier alignment and support intervals. The pier is situated toward the northerly line of West Harbor; however, this part of the shoreline would be more accurately characterized as Fishers Island Sound from the wave exposure design perspective. While Southold Local Law 6 dictates smaller piles sizes, such piles would be inadequate in this location. Waves of 2 to 3 feet are not uncommon at this site, hence the ravaged shoreline features. Clay Point extends out to the north beyond Osprey Point on the west edge of West Harbor. Waves from 5 Long Is____ Sound can be influenced by a fetch of idred miles. These waves can defract and refract around North Hill and come right at this site. The piles proposed for this project will need to be 12-inch Class B piles with 8-inch tips in order to withstand the sea conditions and driving conditions. The use of CCA pressure- treated timbers and Class B 12-inch piles can thus be approved for this project in accordance with Local Law 6. 4. The pier will not be decked with CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine. This pier / walkway provides a"safe pedestrian surface for access to the berthed boat. Rails shown to may be installed on the pier for safety. 5. The pier is located near,the center of the property line. The 15-foot property line clearance specified in this paragraph has been honored and should not be an issue because the proposed pier does not represent a significant encroachment into the boating operation area of the property to the south or to the north nor does it project into the navigation way for other boaters in the Harbor. 6. Upon receipt of the permit for this project, appropriate permit numbers and a Town permit placard will be affixed to the most seaward face of the pier for identification from the water. 7. There are no permanent structures located above the pier decking, nor are any planned at this time, other than the power post and railing which are fixed by function. 8. It is currently possible to provide a five-foot passage way beneath this pier and that access ability will be retained landward of the apparent high-water line. There is only minimal beach width to walk under the pier at high tide, however, foot traffic in this rocky shoreline area is rare, if at all and so the additional tui-r� anfaper stairway has been left out of this pier layout. �----- --�' DEC 26 2018 NEW YORK STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM These application documents include a copy of the Federal Con istency As e��'�6&'Form utilize for the New York State Coastal Management Program under the juns is ion o ° of r s , s Department of State. The following policies have been identified as pertinent to this application and the reason for consistency associated with this project is outlined in each respective case. Policy 2 —Water Dependent Uses= This project is to maintain a fully functional water dependent use, a -recreational boating dock facility at this site in support of recreational boating. Policy 5 — Use of Existing Developed Shorefront — There is no developed shoreline on this site. This project utilizes natural existing shorefront which is dominated by an accumulation of stone which has abundant vegetative resources such as bittersweet, poison ivy and junipers with only sporadic patches of tidal wetlands vegetation or individual plants. The project will be to rebuild the pier and remove crib timbers to the existing shoreward terminus to make it safe and reliably usable in most weather conditions without impeding shoreline public access. If greater clearances are required the sloped section can be lengthened. Policy 7 — Significant Fish & Wildlife Habitat — Protection of significant fish and wildlife habitat has been considered in the development of this project layout. The pier, to the shoreward point of beginning, has avoided the shoreline spartina patches and runs 4 to,5 feet above the rocky intertidal sediments and should not jeopardize the health of any shoreline vegetation. Typically, there is a slight environmental 6 benefit to a pier project,___ause of the creation of structure in the wa«t column where barnacles, algae and crustaceans will colonize and grow. The alignment of the pier remains as is so as not to adversely affect the eel grass fringe strip that follows the 3 to 4 contours around the existing pier. Policy 8 — Protection & Preservation of Habitat— Protection and preservation of habitat has also been considered in this project and the dock structure is being kept to its longstanding configuration and of materials consistent with standards of the industry and restrictions set forth in the Wetlands Law, No. 6, 2004 set forth by the Town of Southold and standards of the NYS DEC. The pier point of origin will remain over a stony part of the beach to make use of the least habitat and minimize damage to natural resources. Policy 11 —Minimize Damage to Natural Resources -The dock construction project has been laid out in such a way so as to minimize damage or impact to natural resources as identified in Policy 7 above. The dock facility will remain in its longstanding location where stone on the beach has already impacted shoreline vegetation and the length is the minimum practical length for the slip to reach 4 feet of water depth at MLW. Policy 14—No Measurable Increase in Flooding- This project consists of construction of an open wood pile and timber pier which in no way adversely affects waterflow and circulation in West Harbor or Fishers Island Sound or flooding potential of the area. Flood levels all around Fishers Island are dictated by water levels in Long Island Sound, Fishers Island Sound and Block Island Sound and this structure will have no adverse influence or in any way impact on those levels. Policy 15—No Dredging—Dredging is not required in this project. The dock will be maintained out in its current location and configuration to avoid any dredging requirements. The depth of 4 feet, as generally recommended by the NYS DEC and US ALOE, has been reached. The waters are not protected enough that boats can be berthed bow to shore but rather bow out in the deeper water. The boat will not ground out at low tide. Policy 19—Impact on Public Access—Public access will not be jeopardized or impeded as a result of this project. As a matter of fact, there is almost no public-access usage of the public trust lands or waters at this site except kayaking and canoeing and that is rare. The intertidal zone is significantly covered by stone and boulders and that is common on adjacent properties. The shallow sub-tidal waters do not present any opportunity or enticement for public access in the area. The pier stops well short of the landward 25% of the waterway width in accordance with US ACOE policies and the 30%width of the Town. West Harbor is more that a mile wide at this point. Thus, public access to the State's lands and waters will not be adversely affected by the project. This project is to rebuild a pier that has existed for more than half a century. Policy 20 — Public Trust Compatibility with Existing Adioining Properties and Land Uses- Public Trust compatibility with existing adjoining properties and land uses have also been considered in this project. Several nearby properties have docking facilities similar to this one and this docking facility will not interfere with existing or the likely configuration of future facilities on immediately adjoining properties or the logical allocation of littoral development rights. Policy 21 —Water Dependent Recreation —This project is consistent with water-dependent recreational opportunities policies set forth in this section. Policy 24—Scenic Resources,Impairment or Loss-This policy is,designed to prevent impairment or loss of scenic resources. The length, height and width of the fixed wood pile and timber pier will not represent such an extent of encroachment or structure which would create a loss of scenic resources on adjacent or nearby properties or views from the water. �--' E � V E 7 DEC 2 6 203 Southold Town Policy 25 — Enhance 'all Scenic Ouality - The restored p���'and dock structure will be consistent with the scenic quality of the area and prevent loss of scenic resources as described in Policy 24 above. Policy 44 — Preserve and Protect Tidal Wetlands — It is acknowledged that the spartina alterna flora exists sporadically in very small patches along the shorefront. The reconstruction of the fixed wood pile and timber pier will take advantage of the existing un-vegetated strip of the shoreline caused by the longstanding pier landing over stone in order to avoid adverse wetlands vegetation impact. The height of the pier should allow opportunities for the growth of the spartina fringe marsh naturally up to, and to an extent, beneath the wood pier if other conditions are suitable, and the same with submerged aquatic vegetation. SUMMARY This project is for pier restoration for recreational boating access at property of the LCMG FINY, LLC on Fishers Island. A copy of all US Army Corps of Engineers, NYS DEC and Town of Southold applications are attached as substantiation for this project. This project complies with applicable standards of the New York State Coastal Management Act, NYS / DEC Tidal Wetland Regulations and criteria for approval, the Town of Southold Waterfront Revitalization Program and Local Ordinance No. 6,2004 and its approval is thus respectfully requested. Respectfully submitted, DOCKO, INC. Keith B.Neilson, P.E. E � 7 DEC 2 P]D 6 2018 So�t,ioid Tovn Board of Tr�siecs 8 �dvs131FQk Town of Southold Erosion, Sedimentation & Storm-Water Run-off ASSESSMENT FORM PROPERTY LOCATION: S.C.T.M.#: THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS MAY REQUIRE THE SUBMISSION OF A Ol d,�,�n j t STORM-WATER,GRADING,DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN D s c= ecST tT -Iy oc-rc c- of CERTIFIED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK. SCOPE OF WORK - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ITEM# / WORK ASSESSMENT Yes No a. What is the Total Area of the Project Parcels? 1 Will this Project Retain All Storm-Water Run-Off (Include Total Area of all Parcels located within Generated by a Two(2")Inch Rainfall on Site? the Scope of Work for Proposed Construction) (S.F.!Acres) (This item will Include all run-off created by site b. What is the Total Area of Land Clearing clearing and/or construction activities as well as all and/or Ground Disturbance for the proposedj i a 11Q Site Improvements and the permanent creation of construction activity? impervious surfaces.) (S.F./Acres) 2 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey Shaw All Proposed PROVIDE BRIEF PROJECT DESCRUMON (ProvideAddidonalPegesasNeeded) Drainage Structures Indicating Size&Location?This Item shall include all Proposed Grade Changes and Slopes Controlling Surface Water Flow. 3 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey describe the erosion and sediment control practices that will be used to control site erosion and storm water discharges. This item must be maintained throughout the Entire Construction Period. 4 Will this Project Require any Land Filling,Grading or Excavation where there is a change to the Natural F1ti Existing Grade Involving more than 200 Cubic Yards of Material within any Parcel? 5 Will this Application Require Land Disturbing Activities Encompassing an Area in Excess of Five Thousand (5,000 S.F.)Square Feet of Ground Surface? 6 Is there a Natural Water Course Running through the Site? Is this Project within the Trustees jurisdiction General DEC SWPPP Requirements: or within One Hundred(100')feet of a Wetland or F] Submission of a SWPPP Is required for all Construction activities Involving sol Beach? disturbances of one(1)or more acres; including disturbances of less than one acre that T Will there be Site preparation on Existing Grade Slopes are part of o larger common plan that will ultimately disturb one mora acres a land; which Exceed Fifteen(15)feet of Vertical Rise to F inciudfng Construction activities involving sol disturbances of lesss than one(1)acre where One Hundred(100')of Horizontal Distance? the DEC has determined that a SPDES permit is required for storm water discharges. (SWPPP's Shall meet the Minimum Requirements of the SPDES General Permit 8 Will Driveways,Parking Areas or other Impervious for Storm Water Discharges from Construction activity-Permit No.GP-0-10-001.) Surfaces be Sloped to Direct Storm-Water Run-Off 1.The SWPPP shall be prepared prior to the submittal of the Not.The NOI shall be into and/or in the direction of a Town right-of-way? submitted to the Department prior to the commencement of construction activity. 2.The SWPPP shall describe the erosion and sediment control practices and where 9 Will this Project Require the Placement of Material, required,post-construction storm water management practices that will be used and/or Removal of Vegetation and/or the Construction of any F]constructed to reduce the pollutants in storm water discharges and to assure Item Within the Town Right-of-Way or Road Shoulder compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit In addition,the SWPPP shall Area?(min Item will NOT include itis istairaaon or Driveway Aprons.) Identify potential sources of pollution which may reasonably be expected to affect the quality of storm water discharges. NOTE: It Any Answer to Questions One through Nine is Answered with a Check Mark 3.All SWPPPs that require the post-construction storm water management practice In a Boz and the construction site disturbance Is between 5,000 S.F.6I Acre In area, component shall be prepared by a qualified Design Professional Licensed In New York a Storm-Water,Grading,Drainage 3 Erosion Control Plan(s Re uired the Town of that is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of Storm Water Management Southold and Mus eviePrtOfTQQ—►you sanies of ilding PerntL (NOTE A Check Ma a An far ayh esnorl is Required r mpiete Application) SPATE OF NEWY I &0ila.ec4taLf- - COUNTY OF.. -.. a?4-A..........SS DEC 2 6 2018 That I,..DAaw� 5w .0.•.. „� ?e'1 1..�s... Pf.� t1.�:CL being duly swum,deposes d s ys that he/she is the applic t for ermit, (tfame of Individual signing Document) And that he/she is the f n / /p} Southold Town .....:ti+n.K�, .a ........ ...J..::.":.`:.. ...........9..4....�......... ..............{;. r T tic .......... er,Contractor,A en Co orate Ofit r stew O 1V f ' Owner and/or representative of the Owner or Owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application;that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief;and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed herewith. Sworn to before me this; ......:..`3 .....day of.....ZD Lo(-PM ..... V20.T NotaryPublic: ... ............ .........................................�� ...................... ' (Signature of Applicant) FORM - 000 1000-2.-1-1-14.1 Town of Southold Erosion, Sedimentation& Storm-Water Run-off Assessment Form Retain and reconstruct 151(+/-)LF of existing 8-FT wide fixed wood pier, of which 120(+/-)LF is waterward of the AHWL, including the installation of thirty-two new support piles, maintain the landward-most stone-filled timber pier support crib, and remove the outermost four support crib timbers. Replace three tie-off piles and install one new tie-off piles, all at and waterward of the Apparent High Tide Line in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. � EOE � : E u DEC 2 6 2018 Sou:hn!d Town Board cf Tr�stces ®O c ko! Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421, Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:office@docko.com L 9 � December 20, 2018 26 20E Mr. Michael J. Domino,President Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall Annex 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: LCMG FINY, LLC Property, Fishers Island Dock Modifications-Revised application package Dear Mr. Domino: On behalf of LCMG FINY, LLC, we enclose herewith a revised permit application package for dock modifications in Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island,NY. I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable;please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, DO c ,0,, INC. Keith B.Neilson, P.E. KBN: eb Enclosure CC: Ms. Leslie Goss File: 17-09-2876 GOSS Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Docko Office <Office@docko.com> cent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 1:57 PM 7o: Cantrell, Elizabeth :Subject: Goss Project (LCMG FINY LLC) Dear Ms. Cantrell, Due to the modifications to the Goss project (LCMG FINY LLC )discussed, we believe that it would be best to postpone our presentation to the Board of Trustees until the January meeting. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Please let us know if the need for further information or discussion arises. Christina Lopes Docko Inc. 14 Holmes St Mystic CT 06355 Tel(860) 572-8939 Fax (860) 572 7569 Office aWocko.com i r BOARD OF TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only Coastal Erosion Permit Application Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit � --- Io.l7l� Received Application Received Fee: $ 506 Completed Application (I.57,15 t-- '- --- =--=--- Incomplete ( a�11y( _ SE RA Classiflcatidn i (_ ' Type I_ Type II_ Unlisted OCT 1 7 2018 Coordination Date:(Date Sent) �- LWRP Consistency Asses sine t Form II, CAC Referral Sent Date of Inspection p Bo'-f'(I__-__� Receipt of CAC Report Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review �%I ZI Z6I��12 Public Hearing Heldp�isial�S@Ji53'Ol1S Resolution: Name of Applicant: LCMG FINY, LLC c/o Leslie Goss Address: (Mailing) 11888 SW Breyman Avenue, Portland, OR 97219 Phone Number: (503)_819-7818 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000-2.-1-14.1 Property Location: 3773 Clay Point Road, Fishers Island,NY 06390 (provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: Docko, Inc. (If applicable) Address: P. O. Box 421, Mystic Mystic, CT 06355 Phone: (860) 572-8939 1 J � Board of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet) : 1.1 ACRES Area Zoning: RESIDENTIAL Previous use of property: RESIDENTIAL Intended use of property: RESIDENTIAL Covenants and Restrictions: Yes X No If"Yes",please provide copy. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals Yes X No If"Yes",please provide copy of decision Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Amy Date No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? —X—No Yes If yes,provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary) : Maintain 151(+/-)LF of existing 8-FT wide fixed wood pier of which 120(+/-)LF is waterward of the AHWL including the installation of 32 new pier support piles, maintain the landward most stone-filled timber pier support crib, and remove the outermost 4 support crib timbers. Replace 3 tie-off piles and install 1 new tie-off pile, all at and waterward of the Apparent High Tide line in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. Board of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: The project is to maintain a pre-1968 pier for recreational boating. Area of wetlands on lot: 1,000 square feet Percent coverage of lot: 1 % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 0-feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 0-feet Does the project involve excavation or filling: _X No Yes If yes,how much material will be excavated? cubic yards How much material will be filled? cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Statement of the effect,if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations(use attachments if appropriate): Stone from the existing cribs is resting on the bottom at this time and will continue to do so. The removal of the crib timbers will diminish shading and make way for improved waterflow and circulation,however,the lesser profile of the pile supports means that there will be less wave protection for the shore. Board of Trustees Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: The project is to maintain a pre-1968 pier for recreational boating. Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? No X Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? —X—No Yes If Yes,now much material will be excavated? (cubic yards) How much material will be filled? (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts to the subject property or neighboring properties reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed, including erosion increase or adverse effects on natural protective features.(Use attachments if necessary): The pier maintenance and crib removal for the LCMG FINY, LLC recreational boatingfacility has been laid out and configured so as to be the same footprint as the pier which has existed for decades, consistent with the DEC permit requirements for such structures and in accordance with recommendations of the Marine Habitat Protection Bureau offered during the workshop pre- gpplication. There was no tidal wetlands vegetation on the beach beneath the pier; there is yM little tidal wetlands on this rocky beach, in any case, because of the open exposure to waves and abrupt toe of the bank which is overgrown with vines and brush. The pier has been configured high, over submerged aquatic vegetation which has grown around the pier in the shallow subtidal waters. As such, it provides adequate height to clear environmental resources of concern and the materials to be utilized are consistent with Town of Southold's Local Law #6 regarding environmental quality and bot using pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine timber decking components in particular. Pier maintenance work will have no adverse impacts on air quality as a result of this structure and the work on the pier should not diminish overall environmental considerations in Fishers Island Sound. The area of pile contact on the bottom sediments is less than 30 SF. r,- Board of Trustees Application AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) I,LCMG FINY,LLC c/o Leslie Goss residing at 3773 Clay Point Road (print owner of property) (mailing address) FISHERS ISLAND, NY do hereby authorize DOCKO, INC. , (Agent) MYSTIC, CT to apply for permit(s) from the Southold Board of Town Trustees on my behalf. /D • Z -(� (Owner' s sigKiature) Board of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York LCMF FINY, LLC BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE / SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTIiOLD AND TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND'CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVE(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. fr v Signature SWORN TO BEFORE MET 1S DAY OF 20L� OFFICIAL RTAMP MEGAN MARIE WASER NOTARY PLEW-01REQON vv v Notaiv P Iic COMMISSION NO.977033 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 23,2022 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part I -Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information LCMG FINY,LLC Name of Action or Project: Dock Reconstruction Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 3773 Clay Point Road Brief Description of Proposed Action: The proposed project is to maintain 151(+/-)LF of existing 8-FT wide fixed wood pier,of which 1202(+/-)LF is waterward of the AHWL,including the installation of 32 new support piles,maintain the landward most,stone filled timber pier support crib and remove the outermost 4 support crib timbers. Replace 3 tie-off piles and install 1 new tie-off pile,all at and waterward of the Apparent High Tide Line in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: (503)819-7818 LCMG FINY,LLC E-Mail: Address: 11888 SW Breyman Avenue City/PO: State: Zip Code: Portland OR 97219 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that ❑ may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: ❑ NYSDOS, USACOE, NYSDEC,Town of Southold 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 1.09 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? n, acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 1.09 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban 15a Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial [_]Commercial 5aResidential(suburban) EaForest ❑Agriculture RAquatic [I Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 3 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ ® ❑ b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ❑ ® ❑ 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? ❑ 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify:There is eel grass growing around the existing pier as shown in the application 1:1drawings/surveys. 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES VNJ b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? 9 ❑ c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? m ❑ 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: ❑ This project will not have significant energy demands even with electric utilities and lights. 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: ❑ A water line(conduit)maybe run out the pier. 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ❑ No water treatment, none required. 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? � ❑ b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? ❑ 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ❑ b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? � [:]If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: The exising longstanding, crib supported,wood timber pier has existed at this site since the 1950's and will be maintained in its current length,width, and height or usage. 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: R Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional [0 Wetland ❑Urban [a Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered?There is eel grass growing along in a band along the shore and around the pier � ❑ 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES Yes,the dock is in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑NO [—]YES 9 ❑ b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ❑NO ❑YES Page 2 of 3 I l 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: ® ❑ 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: ® ❑ 20.Has the site of the°proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject-of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: ® ❑ I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE 1 _ _ Applicant/spon name: LCMG N LLC � j e a�3S Date: OC 6 IaQr 2 zd)� Signature: Page 3 of 3 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action maybe significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. Thefull EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full FAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE— Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of FAF completed for this project: Part 1 Part 2 ®Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: EA. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ®B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ®C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Dock Maintenance Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) website Date PART 1--PROJECT INFORMh►i-iON Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Dock Maintenance Location of Action(include Street Address, Municipality and County) 3773 Clay Point Road, Fishers Island, NY Name of Applicant/Sponsor LCMG FINY, LLC Address 11888 SW Breyman Avenue City/PO Portland State OR Zip Code 97219 Business Telephone (503)819-7818 Name of Owner(if different) Address City/PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: The proposed project is to maintain 151(+/-)LF of existing 8-FT wide fixed wood pier,of which 120(+/-)LF is waterward of the AHWL, including the installation of 32 new pier support piles, maintain the landward most stone filled timber pier support crib,and remove the outermost 4 support crib timbers. Replace 3 tie-off piles and install 1 new tie-off piled,all at and waterward of the Apparent High Tide line in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. Please Complete Each 46-estion--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: Urban ®Industrial ❑CommercialV%JResidential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) 17 Forest ®Agriculture R Other Coastal Shoreline 2. Total acreage of project area: 0103 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0.5 acres 0.5 acres Forested 0.6 acres 0.6 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per)rticles 24,25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved su aces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Gravel a. Soil drainage: Well drained 100% of site ®Moderately well drained % of site. ®Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ® Yes to No a. What is depth to bedrock So (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: F10-10% % F110- 15% % M 15% or greater_% 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes W No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ®Yes IoNo 8. What is the depth of the water table?? 10(in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ®Yes No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ®Yes �No 11. Does project site contain arty-species of plant or animal life that is identified dzi-ihreatened or endangered? 17Yes ®No According to: Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? ®Yes ® No Describe: The site is a wooded lot with an open meadow in the middle.The shoreline is a coastal bluff, heavily vegetated with a moderately steep slope shore into the gravely, rocky intertidal and shallow subtidal waters. 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? rYes &No If yes, explain: 14., Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ®Yes RNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Not Applicable 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: No lake, pond or wetland within the project area. b. Size(in acres): 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ®Yes Fl No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Yes No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? nYes ®No 18. Is the site located inan agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? UYes M No 19. Is the site located in or substantial) contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? [:]Yes KA No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ®Yes MI B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 1.09 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 0.01 acres initially; 0.01 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 1.08 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: 150FT(if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. 0% f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0; proposed 0 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 0(upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially No house on site Ultimately No house planned i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 6-FT height; 8-FT width; 151(+/-)length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? N/Atons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed 0Yes ®No ®N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Site reclamation is not a part of this project. b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®Yes ® No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? FiYes ® No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers)will be removed from site? N/A acres. 5. Will any mature forest (ovei _ D years old) or other locally-important veget _'i be removed by this project? ®Yes r%7 No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 1 months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 1 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: 04 month 2019 year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: 05 month 2019 year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? FiYes M No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ®Yes 10 No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction, 3; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project N/A 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?E]Yes 1;7 No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ®Yes No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? F1 Yes 9 No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? 1711 Yes No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? MYes ®No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [D Yes r%7 No - a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? 17 Yes ®No c. If yes, give name location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? E]Yes ® No e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? FYes RNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? 3 tans tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes R No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes RNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? RYes ®No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? F Yes R No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day NIA gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? 0 Yes R No If yes, explain: 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date � Town of Southold City, Town, Village Board W Yes ®No Board of Trustees City, Town, Village Planning Board ®Yes ❑ No City, Town Zoning Board Yes M No City, County Health Department ®Yes ® No Other Local Agencies ®Yes ® No Other Regional Agencies O Yes Fi No NYSDEC August 2018 ' State Agencies r%7 Yes F1 No US ACOE August 2018 Federal Agencies WO Yes ®No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Yes 9 No If Yes, indicate decision required: 1-7 Zoning amendment Zoning variance ® New/revision of master plan Subdivision 17 Site plan ® Special use permit ®Resource management plan ® Other 1 2. What is the zoning classific4icf (s) of the site? Residential 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Single Family Residence 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? Residential 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Not Applicable 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Yes No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a'/a mile radius of proposed action? All the land use to the east, north and south of the site is residential. 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a'/a mile? K7 Yes ®No g. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require=v nauthorization(s) for the formation of sewer u, water districts? ® Yes No , 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? ®Yes No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Yes No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ®Yes R No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. E]Yes ®No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name LCMG FINY, LLC Date Signature Title Applicant/Co-Owner If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. LCMG PINY,LLC FISHERS ISLAND SOUND FISHERS ISLAND,NEW YORK NARRATIVE STATEMENT & SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR NYS DEC,NYS/DOS AND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATIONS August 20,18 GENERAL LCMG FINY, LLC owns parcel 1000-2.-1-14.1 off Clay Point Road a private road, located along the west shore of Clay Point along Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island. The site is generally moderately sloped, sandy gravel soils, vegetated with grass, brush, landscaping ground cover and trees. The frontage of the property is approximately 400 feet along Fishers Island Sound at the east shore, abutted by the Mr. J Geddis Parsons property to the north and Rocky Ledge Partners, LLC to the south. The waterfront consists of a partially rock-covered beach with tidal wetlands vegetation at the base of the moderately sloped coastal bluff in the vicinity of the pier. It is LCMG FINY, LLC desire to maintain the existing fixed pier dock system but using driven wood piles to replace the deteriorated cribs. The pier will be at an end elevation of 6 feet above Mean Low Water (MLW), sloping upward and crossing over the boulder-strewn intertidal zone above the bottom sediments until reaching a finished elevation of about 10 feet to shore at that elevation, stopping short of the bank where it comes ashore with a ramped section of about 20 foot length which allows passage of the public on the rocky beach below; a rare event. Attached are application drawings prepared for this project showing this configuration and pertinent details. This supplemental narrative has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Town of Southold, Ordinance No. 6, 2004, and the Waterfront Revitalization Program related to docks and shorefront improvements. In addition, various coastal policies under the New York State Coastal Management Act are addressed herein for review by the New York State Department of State and Department of Environmental Conservation. This project is maintenance of a longstanding pier and dock facility. DESCRIPTION OF WORK As mentioned in the introductory paragraph,,this project is to retain and maintain a fixed wood pile and timber pier changing the supports from cribs to piles along the shore out into Fishers Island Sound in accordance with existing guidelines set forth in the Town of Southold ordinance No. 6, 2004. It is envisioned that this structure will be built utilizing the following general sequence and methodology. ➢ The marine contractor will arrive by water with barge-mounted crane and push boats. ➢ The existing pier will be maintained, and all wood salvaged from the cribs for disposal in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and ordinances. ➢ New piles will be driven starting at the'shore landing end of the pier and proceeding waterward at roughly 10-foot intervals to the waterward end of the pier. These piles will be driven by double-acting air hammer to a bearing capacity of 20 tons and pull-out resistance of approximately 10 tons. This generally requires about twelve to fifteen feet of embedment of the pile in the bearing stratum. Because of the exposure with the prevailing wind westerly 1 wave field,nese piles will be 12-inch nominal diameter class B Southern Yellow Pine pressure treated to 2.5 pcf of CCA Type C. ➢ After the piles are installed, split caps (also referred to as split clamps) consisting of a pair of pressure treated Southern Pine timbers, 4 x 10 to 4 x 12 nominal dimension, will be bolted to the piles transversely forming a pile bent. Stringers will be then laid on the split caps parallel to the length of the pier. In all likelihood, five runs of stringers will be set and will probably consist of 3 x 10 pressure-treated Southern Pine. ➢ The outer stringer on each side will be bolted or spiked to the pile to secure it against wave uplift forces that this pier might be exposed to. ➢ After the stringers have been connected to the piles and split caps, the decking will be installed. In accordance with Town of Southold's Ordinance No. 6, 2004, this decking will not be CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine but rather oak, cedar hardwood or plastic / composite such as "Timber Tech" or similar synthetic, composite or plastic material with the brushed side mounted up. If composites or plastic are used, it will be either gray, brown or natural in color. Decking will be attached to the stringers utilizing galvanized nails or stainless-steel Phillips or flathead square-drive wood screws about 3 inches long and will be set with a 1/" gap between deck planks. ➢ The over-water decking will run level at a height of up to eight feet above the existing bottom sediments in the shallow subtidal zone. See Sheet 4 of the application drawings for the pier profile. ➢ The piles will be about 42 inches above the deck surface and support horizontal rail members. ➢ The mid-rail can be timber or cable and both details are shown. ➢ A top rail of cedar, oak, hardwood or Timber Tech material will be installed for safety. ➢ Water and electricity will be run out on the pier in the space between the stringers so that trickle chargers on the boat may be powered during tie-ups. The water will allow boats to be rinsed off after usage. A power post with an internal light will be mounted to the end of the fixed pier with receptacles to provide power to the boats from extension cords. The power post will also have coiling arms for storage of the electric service cord and hose between uses. Because the dock may be used during the hours of darkness, low-intensity lights will be mounted on staggered piles or dock rail posts to illuminate the deck and the walking surface up the bank. This system will be manually, or radio controlled with a shut-off timer so that the lights will only be on when necessary for safety of the users. LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION POLICIES The Town of Southold, LWRP policies that are applicable to the dock proposal are a local refinement of the Long Island Sound Regional Coastal Management Program policies that apply throughout Long Island Sound. The Goss site is off Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island and is characterized predominately as undeveloped coast or natural coast. The undeveloped coast policies are applicable as follows: ➢ Policy 1 is to foster a pattern of development that enhances community character and preserves natural resources to the maximum extent and minimizes adverse impacts on the environment, ➢ Policy 2 is to preserve historic resources, ➢ Policy 3 is to enhance and protect scenic resources and visual quality. The pier maintenance and crib removal for LCMG FINY, LLC is consistent with waterfront development on Fishers Island and in coastal areas. The pier is made of suitably-sized timbers and utilizes the materials allowable under Local Law #6 with due consideration of climatic conditions at the site and replacement components will conform as well. This proposal is consistent with other 2 adjacent dock face nes and characteristics for !the visual and scenic considerations. The encroachment is not significant, to be consistent with DEC policies, Southold Local Law #6, US ACOE policies and the structure is as low profile as possible, consistent with the safe and efficient use of the waters and consistent with the tidal and wave exposure of this site. Lighting will be minimal for operational safety and otherwise off, and lights will be utilized only when necessary for boating purposes so that during hours of darkness there will be no adverse impact NATURAL COAST'POLICIES The Natural Coastal Policies are 4 through 8 and require consideration as follows: ➢ Policy 4—Minimize loss of life, structures and natural resources from flooding and erosion, ➢ Policy 5 —Protect and improve water quality, ➢ Policy 6—Protect and restore the quality and'function of the eco-system, ➢ Policy 7—Protect and improve air quality, ➢ Policy 8 - Minimize environmental degradation primarily from solid waste and hazardous substances. The pier maintenance crib removal for LCMG FINY, LLC recreational boating facility has been laid out and configured so as to be the same footprint as the pier which has been here for decades, consistent with the DEC permit requirements for such structures and in accordance-with recommendations of the Marine Habitat Protection Bureau offered during the workshop pre- application. There was no tidal wetlands vegetation on the beach where the pier begins. The pier has been configured high, over submerged aquatic vegetation which has grown around the pier in the shallow subtidal waters. As such, it provides adequate height to clear environmental resources of concern and the materials to be utilized are consistent with Town of Southold's Local Law #6 regarding environmental quality and the use of pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine timber components in particular. Pier maintenance work will have no adverse impacts on air quality as a result of this structure and the work on the dock should not diminish overall environmental considerations in Fishers Island Sound. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9 sets forth a priority to provide for public access and recreational use of coastal waters, public lands and public resources of the Town. This project maintains a longstanding (decades old) recreational boating facility for the LCMG FR-;Y, LLC property and so is consistent with this policy. WORKING COAST POLICIES The policies of this section relate to the following: ➢ Policy 10 — Protection of the Town's water-dependent uses and promoting new water- dependent uses in suitable locations, ➢ Policy 11 —Promoting sustainable use of living marine resources, ➢ Policy 12—Protect agricultural lands, ➢ Policy 13 —Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. While most of the Working Coast Policies are not applicable to this site or this type of project, Policy 10, promoting water-dependent uses and the siting of water-dependent uses in appropriate areas is applicable. The proposed maintenance project makes the most beneficial use of the land and keeping the dock facility in the most appropriate, historic point of the land where access down the 3 bank will not require cnanges in structural facilities and can be accommodated with path work rather than formal stairs and so on. This project has been laid out with specific reference and review of the Waterfront Revitalization Program policies and is considered to be consistent. In summary, the dock is typical of recreational boating facilities throughout the area and all along coastal New England. The pier structure maintains the same length, width,height, and structure so as to be consistent with other facilities of a similar nature and the minimum necessary components to accommodate safe and efficient boating operations from this site safely in a variety of climatic conditions. Pile supports will be utilized instead of cribs and old crib timbers will be removed leaving the stone on the bottom for habitat diversity. This project does not interfere with public access or use of public trust waters and lands of the State, it does not interfere with navigation, it will not create soil or sedimentation erosion problems, it does not adversely environmental resources and in the area where the facility must span the intertidal zone at the shore line, the facility will be maintained in the area of rocks where environmental resources have already acclimated to the pier and boating activity so as not to worsen any of these conditions. The height of the structure has been specifically addressed so as to maintain clearance above the shoreline tidal wetlands plants if other conditions are conducive to such growth. The dock facility maintenance reach out to 4-feet of water in Fisher Island Sound so that dredging will not be an issue in the future, thus further minimizing adverse environmental impacts. More than 95% of the LCMG FINY, LLC shoreline will remain in a natural state as a result of these considerations for design. 'There is no loss of valuable marine and wetland habitat and no water quality degradation as a result of this project. No natural protective features or processes will be adversely impacted as a result of the maintenance work on the docking facility. Dense growth areas of submerged aquatic vegetation in the proposed dock or berthing area have been avoided. Reference is made to the NYS DEC study from 2000 indicating the suitability of pressure- treated Southern Yellow Pine piles and super-structure components for this type of purpose. The piles must be 12-inch diameter due to site exposure. In accordance with Local Law#6, decking for the pier and the approach ramp will be of woods other than Southern Yellow Pine or plastic. This project is consistent with zoning policies and ordinances for the Town. The dock facility will be an accessory to the home located at this site. There will be no development of the upland related to this dock facility that will create point sources of pollution or drainage. This project is providing recreational boating and water usage opportunities compatible with the natural resource values and characteristics of the site. The dock is existing sized for stability considerations especially acknowledging that waves from the north can come in from Fishers Island Sound and the dock is angled more or less into those waves. REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 97-25 OF THE WETLANDS LAW 6,2004 The permittee acknowledges that the validity of this permit is subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. The permittee does, by the acceptance of this permit, assume all responsibility for operations undertaken pursuant to this permit, and shall take all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property resulting from such operations. By such acceptance, the permittee also agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Town and its officers. The permittee gives consent to the Town and its officers, employees and agents to enter upon the premises where such operations are being conducted to make such inspections to determine whether said operations are being conducted in conformity with the permit. 4 The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing one week prior to initiation of any and all operations. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing upon completion of operations such that the site can be inspected for issuance for a certificate of compliance. In response to Sub-section 2a and the General Rules for Standards of Residential and Commercial Docks,the following additional information is offered. 1. Permits for the work are being applied for through the Town, US ACOE, NYS DEC and a coastal zone consistency determination by the NYS DOS. 2. The new piles to be installed will be of sturdy, durable and stable materials; in all likelihood, Greenhart, Kakaralli or CCA Type C pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine (SYP) 12-inch diameter class B piles with new split caps and braces of pressure-treated SYP materials. These members will be a minimum of 3 x 8's and more often, 3 x 10's and 4 x 10's with at least one 1-inch bolt per connection, and in other cases, two 3/ inch bolts per connection. This pier is a fixed, pile-supported timber structure and therefore will not adversely affect the free circulation of water or reduce the effects of fluctuating water levels in Fishers Island Sound or West Harbor. In addition, the pier does not present any adverse modification of the shoreline. The pier's end elevation is such that in extreme high flood tides the structure will be inundated. The structure's SYP timber materials represent the standard of the industry being specifically grown a renewable resource for this type of usage and are capable of withstanding full immersion. With the connections described above, this structure will be able to survive repeated inundations and even direct waves at high tide elevations with a structural life of approximately 20 years. 3. The pier support will include driving new I2-inch diameter piles at 10-foot intervals to the maximum extent possible in order to obtain the desired pier alignment and support intervals. The pier is situated toward the northerly line of West Harbor, however this part of the shoreline would be more accurately characterized as Fishers Island Sound from the wave exposure design perspective. While Southold Local Law 6 dictates smaller piles sizes, such piles would be inadequate in this location. Waves of 2 to 3 feet are not uncommon at this site, hence the ravaged shoreline features: Clay Point extends out to the north beyond Osprey Point on the west edge of West Harbor. Waves from Long Island Sound can be influenced by a fetch of a hundred miles. These waves can defract and refract around North Hill and come right at this site. The piles proposed for this project will need to be 12-inch Class;B piles with 8-inch tips in order to withstand the sea conditions and driving conditions. The use of CCA pressure-treated timbers and Class B 12-inch piles can thus be approved for this project in accordance with Local Law 6. 4. The pier will not be decked with CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine. This pier/ walkway provides a safe pedestrian surface for access to the berthed boat. Rails shown to may be installed on the pier for safety. 5 5. The pier is located near the center of the property line. The 15-foot clearance specified in this paragraph has been honored and should not be an issue because the proposed pier does not represent a significant encroachment into the boating operation area of the property to the south or to the north nor does it project into the navigation way for other boaters in the Harbor. 6. Upon receipt of the permit for this project, appropriate permit numbers and a Town permit placard will be affixed to the most seaward face of the pier for identification from the water. 7. There are no permanent structures located above the pier decking, nor are any planned at this time, other than the power post and railing which are fixed by function. 8. It is currently possible to provide a five-foot passage way beneath this pier and that access ability will be retained landward of the apparent high-water line. There is only minimal room to walk under the pier at high tide, however, foot traffic in this area is rare, if at all and so the additional structure of an up and over stairway has been left out of this pier layout. NEW YORK STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM These application documents include a copy of the Federal Consistency Assessment Form utilized for the New York State Coastal Management Program under the jurisdiction of the New York State Department of State. The following policies have been identified as pertinent to this application and the reason for consistency associated with this project is outlined in each respective case. Policy 2 Water Dependent Uses—This project is to maintain a fully functional water dependent use, a recreational boating dock facility at this site in support of recreational boating. Policy 5 —Use of Existing Developed Shorefront—There is no developed shoreline on this site. This project utilizes natural existing shorefront which is,dominated by an accumulation of stone which has abundant vegetative resources such as bittersweet, poison ivy and junipers with only sporadic patches of tidal wetlands vegetation or individual plants. The project will be to rebuild the pier and remove crib timbers to the existing shoreward terminus to make it safe and reliably usable in most weather conditions without impeding shoreline public access. Policy 7 — Significant Fish & Wildlife Habitat— Protection of significant fish and wildlife habitat has been considered in the development of this project layout. The pier, to the shoreward point of beginning, has avoided the shoreline spartina patches and runs 4 to 5 feet above the rocky intertidal sediments and should not jeopardize the health of any shoreline vegetation. Typically, there is a slight environmental benefit to a pier project because of the creation of structure in the water column where barnacles, algae and crustaceans will colonize and grow. The alignment of the pier remains as is so as not to adversely affect the eel grass fringe strip that follows the 3 to 4 contours around the existing pier. Policy 8 — Protection & Preservation of Habitat— Protection and preservation of habitat has also been considered in this project and the dock structure is being kept to its longstanding configuration and of materials consistent with standards of the industry and restrictions set forth in the Wetlands Law, No. 6, 2004 set forth by the Town of Southold and standards of the NYS DEC. The pier point of origin will remain over a stony part of the beach to make use of the least habitat and minimize damage to natural resources. 6 Policy 11 —Minimize Damage to Natural Resources - The dock construction project has been laid out in such a way so as to minimize damage or impact to natural resources as identified in Policy 7 above. The dock facility will remain in its longstanding location where stone on the beach has already impacted shoreline vegetation and the length is the minimum practical length for the slip to reach 4 feet of water depth at MLW. Policy 14 — No Measurable Increase in Flooding= This project consists of construction of an open wood pile and timber pier which in no way adversely affects waterflow and circulation in West Harbor or Fishers Island Sound or flooding potential of the area. Flood levels all around Fishers Island are dictated by water levels in Long Island Sound, Fishers Island Sound and Block Island Sound and this structure will have no adverse influence or in any way impact on those levels. Policy 15—No Dredging=Dredging is not required in this project. The dock will be maintained out in its current location and configuration to avoid any dredging requirements. The depth of 4 feet, as generally recommended by the NYS DEC and US ACOE, has been reached. The waters are not protected enough that boats can be berthed bow to shore but rather bow out in the deeper water. The boat will not ground out at low tide. Policy 19 — Impact on Public Access —Public access will not be jeopardized or impeded as a result of this project. As a matter of fact, there is almost no public access usage of the public trust lands or waters at this site except kayaking and canoeing and that is rare. The intertidal zone is significantly covered by stone and boulders and that is common on adjacent properties. The shallow sub-tidal waters do not present any opportunity or enticement for public access in the area. The pier stops well short of the landward 25%'of the waterway width in accordance with US ACOE policies. West Harbor is more that a mile wide at this point. Thus, public access to the State's lands and waters will not be adversely affected by the project. Policy 20 — Public Trust Compatibility with Existing Adjoining Properties and Land Uses- Public Trust compatibility with existing adjoining properties and land uses have also been considered in this project. Several nearby properties have docking facilities similar to this one and this docking facility will not interfere with existing or the likely configuration of future facilities on immediately adjoining properties or the logical allocation of littoral development rights. Policy 21 —Water Dependent Recreation—This project is consistent with water-dependent recreational opportunities policies set forth in this section. Policy 24 —Scenic Resources, Impairment or Loss - This policy is designed to prevent impairment or loss of scenic resources. The length, height and width of the fixed wood pile and timber pier will not represent such an extent of encroachment or structure which would create a loss of scenic resources on adjacent or nearby properties or views from the water. Policy 25 — Enhance Overall Scenic Quality - The maintained dock structure will be consistent with the scenic quality of the area and prevent loss of scenic resources as described in Policy 24 above. Policy 44 — Preserve and Protect Tidal Wetlands — It is acknowledged that the spartina alterna flora exists sporadically in very small patches along the shorefront. The maintenance of the fixed wood pile and timber pier will take advantage of the un-vegetated strip of the shoreline caused by the longstanding pier landing over stone in order to avoid adverse wetlands vegetation impact. The height of the pier should allow opportunities for the growth of the spartina fringe marsh naturally up to, and to an extent, beneath the wood pier if other conditions are suitable, and the same with submerged aquatic vegetation. 7 SUMMARY This project is for pier maintenance for recreational boating access at property of the LCMG FINY, LLC on Fishers Island. A copy of all US Army Corps of Engineers, NYS DEC and Town of Southold applications are attached as substantiation for this project. This project complies with applicable standards of the New York'State Coastal Management Act, NYS / DEC Tidal Wetland Regulations and criteria for approval, the Town of Southold Waterfront Revitalization Program and Local Ordinance No. 6, 2004 and its approval is thus respectfully requested. Respectfully submitted, DOCKO, INC. Keith B.Neilson, P.E. 8 ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIC'_'FAIRE This is intended to supplement ENG Form 4345, Application for Department of the Army Permit, or the Joint Application for Permit used in the State of New York. Please provide complete answers to all questions below which are relevant to your project. Any answers may be continued on separate-sheets) of paper to be-attached to this form. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT The purpose of this form is to provide the Corps of Engineers with basic information regarding your project. This information will be used to facilitate evaluation of your permit application and for public dissemination as required by regulation. Failure to provide complete information may result in your application being declared incomplete for processing, thereby delaying processing of your application. GENERAL-APPLICABLE TO ALL PROJECTS 1. Explain the need for, and purpose of, the proposed work.The proposed project is to maintain 151(+/-)LF of existing 8-FT wide fixed wood pier, of which 120(+/-)LF is waterward of the AHWL, including the installation of 32 new pier support piles, maintain the landward most stone filled timber pier support crib, and remove the outermost 4 support crib timbers. Replace 3 tie-off piles and install 1 new tie-off pile, all at and waterward of the Apparent High Tide Line in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. 2. Provide the names and addresses of property owners adjacent to your work site (if not shown on the application form or project drawings). Mr. J Geddis Parsons, Parsons Capital Management Inc., 10 Weybosset Street, Suite 1000, Providence, RI 02903. Rocky Ledge Partners, LLC., P.O. Box 91, Montchanin, DE 19710-0091. (Please note that depending upon the nature and extent of your project, you may be requested to provide the names and addresses of additional property owners proximate to your project site to ensure proper coordination.) 3. Photographs of the project site should be submitted. For projects in tidal areas, photographs of the waterway vicinity should be taken at low tide. Using a separate copy of your plan view, indicate the location and direction of each photograph as well as the date and time at which the photograph- was taken. Provide a sufficient number of photographs so as to provide a clear understanding of conditions on and proximate to your project site. See attached photos. 4. Provide a copy, my environmental impact staten{- "J; or any other environmental report which was~.-pared for your project. Attached are copies of the Short and long form Environmental Review Assessment for this maintenance project. 5. Provide a thorough discussion of alternatives to your proposal. This discussion should include, but not necessarily be limited to, the "no action" alternative and alternative(s) resulting in less disturbance to waters of the United States. For filling projects in waters of the United States, including wetlands,your alternatives discussion should demonstrate that there are no practicable alternatives to your proposed filling and that your project meets with current mitigation policy(i.e-. avoidance, minimization and compensation). DREDGING PROJECTS Answer the following if your project involves dredging. 1. Indicate the estimated volume of material to be dredged and the depth (below mean •low water) to which dredging would occur. Would there be overdepth dredging? There is no dredging associated with this project. J 2. You can apply for a ten-year permit for maintenance dredging. If you wish to apply for a ten-year permit, please provide the number of additional dredging events during the ten-year life of the permit and the amount of material to be removed during future events. 3. Indicate of your drawings the dewatering area (if applicable) and disposal site for the dredged material(except landfill sites). Submit a sufficient number of photographs of the dewatering and disposal sites as applicable so as to provide a clear indication of existing conditions. For ten-year maintenance dredging permits, indicate the dewatering/disposal sites for future dredging events, if known. 4. Describe the method of dredging(i.e. clamshell, dragline, etc.) and the expected duration of dredging. 5. Indicate the physical nature of the material to be dredged(i.e. sand, silt, clay, etc.) and provide estimated percentages of the various constituents if available. For beach nourishment projects, grain size analysis data is required. 6. Describe the method of dredged material containment (i.e. hay bales, embankment, bulkhead, etc.) and whether return flow from the dewatering/disposal site would reenter any waterway. Also indicate if there would be any barge overflow. MOORING FACILITIES Answer the following if your project includes the construction or rehabilitation of recreational mooring facilities. 1. It is generally recommended that any fixed piers and walk ramps be limited to four feet in width, and that floats be-limited to eight feet in width and rest at least two feet above the waterway bottom at mean low water. Terminal floats at private, non- commercial facilities should be limited to 29 feet in length. If you do not believe your proposal can meet with these recommendations, please provide the reason(s). The pier is 8-FT wide and 151(+/-)FT long with no floating dock complying with all of these conditions except width. The pier has existed in this configuration since before December 16, 1968. 2. Using your plan view, show to scale the location(s), position(s) and size(s) (including length,beam and draft)of vessel(s)to be moored at the proposed facility, including those of transient vessel(s) if known. 3. For commercial mooring sites such as marinas, indicate the capacity of the facility and indicate on the plan view the location(s) of any proposed fueling and/or sewage pumpout facilities. If pumpout facilities are not planned, please discuss the rationale below and indicate the distance to the nearest available pumpout station. 4. Indicate on your in view the distance to adjacent n, `ine structures, if any are proximate and shat_ .he locations and dimensions of s?Fl. structures. See attached application drawings. 5. Discuss the nee;-""--rr wave protection at the proposc -'3cility. Please be advised that if a permit is issuE'__, you would be required to recogm- that the mooring facility may be subject to wave action from wakes of passing vessels, whose operations would not be required to be modified. Issuance of a permit would not relieve you of ensuring the integrity of the authorized structure(s) and the United States would not be held responsible for damages to the structure(s) and vessel(s) moored thereto from wakes from passing vessels. There is no good opportunity for wave protection at this site. Waves from the wave field northwesterly to northeasterly of the site are unobstructed in their approach, however, wave boards would tend to over stress the pier structure and so it was felt that the boat should be removed from the site when rough weather approaches and leave the pier supporting piles open and the wave path unobstructed. BULKHEAD/NG/BANK STABILIZA TION/FILLING ACTIVITIES Answer the following if your project inclues construction of bullfheading(also retaining walls and seawalls) with backfill, filling of waters/wetlands, or any other bank stabilization fills such as riprap, revetments, gabions, etc. 1. Indicate the total- volume of fill (including backfill behind a structure such as a bulkhead) as well as the volume of fill to be placed into waters of the United States. The amount of fill in waters of the United States can be determined by calculating the amount of fill to be placed below the plane of spring high tide in tidal areas and below ordinary high water in non-tidal areas. There is no bulkheading /bank stabilizations or filling activity proposed in this dock maintenance application. 2. Indicate the source(s) and type(s) of fill material. 3. Indicate the method of fill placement(i.e. by hand, bulldozer, crane, etc.). Would any temporary fills be required in waterways or wetlands to provide access for construction equipment? If so, please indicate the area of such waters and/or wetlands to be filled, and show on the plan and sectional views. There is no fill to be placed. The foregoing re(----sts basic information on the m " common types of projects requiring Departm, of the Army permits. It is intend ;o obviate or reduce the need for requesting additional information; however, additional information may be requested above and beyond what is requested in this form. Please feel free to add any additional information regarding your project which you believe may facilitate our review. Please see the attached narrative. Town of Southold lr s n,. i t . ' 1 > I - - PRQPEwy - 34=11* tOaa 111 l SUBMISSION OF t. 1000 2 1 14.1 SfORIWWATER,GRADING, GE AND EROSION CCS RtOL PLAN -mmTet- IFiSG BY A DR-8 0 —PROPESSIONAL.114 Trig-STATE OF R 'ytr SCOPE.OP'WO _ PROPos ct)11T to w / ( des + a. What is the Total Area of tha3 Pcaject i?a"Is? «� Will this Project Retain Ail Stbrm-Water Butt-C'ff (Include Totaal Area of all Parcels located Within 1.1 Acres Generates!by dTwo ")Inch RaInfall on S7te?' lite Scope of Wo*for Proposed Donstru an} (This Item will include all run-o#t created-by site b. What Is the Total Area of Land Glaartng ts. tom} dearing and/or constructIon �cllvitles as well as all -- and/or Ground Disturbance for the proposed Site Improvements and the petmandrtt creation of construction acW Impervious surfaces.) (S.F.t AMs} less the Site Plan andlor,Survey, " Al PrdposW FROVIIN9 FIRMFXROJECT DEStRHMOX .. Drainer Structures.InglicaUng Size location?This Item shall Include all Proposed Grade Cftanges and ---+ Maintain 151(+/-)LF of existing 8-FT wide fixed wood pier of slopes dxitrolitng Surface.Wa*MVM Does the Site Flan and/or Survey describe the erosion. which,120 +/-LF is waterward of the AHWL including the and sediment control practices that wilt be used to a installation of 32 new support piles; maintain the'landward controlsite erosion and storm water discharges. This T Item trtust be malritalned"throughout the Entire most stone-filled timber pier support crib,and remove the Construction Perm. 4 Will this Pmject Rdquire any Land Filling,Grading or outermost 4 support crib timbers. Replace 3 tie-off piles and M46tvialion where there is a ftnge to the Natural Existing Grads Involving more than 200 Cubic Yards install 1 new tie-off pile,all at and waterward of the Apparent of Material within any Parcell 5''Will this Application Res)tilra Land Disturbing Abtivilie Encompassing an Area In Excels of Five Thousand Q/ (5,000 S,F,)Square Feet of GroundSurface? Is there a Natural Water Course Running through the Site' is this project within the Trustees Jurisdiction General DEC SwPPP Rertuiremsnts: or within One Hun. (100.)feetofa Wetland or El Submission or a SWI)PP Is required for all Gorebuclion adMtles Invot0niti and Beach? d turiratace7s oYone t1}rrr aeras; dts ortess,ttuaa nr that 7 Will there be Site preparation on Eosting Grade Stopes are pea of a larger cor6rm pin that wM utswatoly disturb otic or mars Adma of land; which Exceed 1 I n(15)feat of Vertical Rita to PJ Inciuding Contstmaotion amides involving sod.disturbances of lose theta one(1)scar whom . El the DEC has determined that a SPOES poTs mqufmd ror stone water dlachargaa One Hundred(1 C6 )of Horizontal Dls nce? nd* ( P's Slial!mod*iia minimum Roquiremotats of#as SPOES ctsnetal Permit 8 Will DrIow ays,Parl klg.Amas or other Impervious fs for Storni water Discharges from Construction activity-pit".it ft GP4-1 1.) Surfaces be sloped to Direct Storni-Water Ron-Off 1."7hh9.SWPPP shell be pmpmd pf to deer submittal of the.NCN."neo HOI shall be Into endler in the df ort of a Town -of- ' submittid to the *rtm ant prior to ttsas tit of pis scd+rAy. 2.The SWPPP sad desoibe the oroslon and sit pmotlow and where 9 "It this Pmject Require the Placement of Material. requwd.post-;ensu 0Wn storrawatermanagententproeticas thaat vA to used andtor Removal of Vegetatfon.andlor the C:on huctiota of arty committed to reduce the nta In storm tsrdischaagss end to ra item ti�Ithtn the Town Right-of-Way or Roth Should�tr — cwrdatPeaico with the terms and oondlWhs of thus pera t;to add%*the SWPPP shad. Area?two Itam war Hw kwu&tam imuwan oto ) Comntary of PoWtIon atatcta rrray,mossonably be w9ected to affect the qua*of storm water discltsrges. ; NMy Anowerta Questions one throe h tribe is An with d Cheri In a nem and ctton sib die to too !.M S.P.&fi Aomln , .Rd SWPPP9 t tegssv€a title eorasttttra atormwefiraatzaljottaatatOradeart storm haat Sssairsg.otstnttge$Evaataic control Ptah Is Recµt byttaaTa;va.ar Herat sham be preptirccl by g Ruadii7 i ii Ptaftt kasal i! in Mw Yash Southold and Must be Sub m d for Prior to Issuanceof auttdtng it. that k dgss4 in.bto pttndpigs andd pre of Stam Water Management. INCrE A Lacca Assrh(T} rar rash tt fares tote Ap } S I ATE OF Z ,� Car a�a�x ti, QuG" �'{� '3f ��. All. . SS "l hat I Docko, Inc., Keith B. Neilson, P.E. ...<............................................................................beim duly swum,deposes and'says that-he/she is the applicant rias Permit, ( a1 st ,tngMoment) And`thathe/she is the ..,Rent.DockoInc..,.... .. ......................... .. ............... ,.... ..'( .r.. ..r,Ageu!Catg�otalt3Z ..ie ) Owner and/or representative of the Owner or Owners,and is duly authorized to perform lir have performed the said work and to /Hake and rale this applicaticsn;that all statements contained in this applicdoon are trite to the/,best of his kuowled .and Relief;and that the work will be.perforrned in the niantier set forth in the application filed herewith. Sworn to be`fore'rne this; �9 .....,.��,T .-*lay.of•. �,. ...... 20/? 1+Tatargr Pttblsc: .. (�1.. .. .. . ....,....>... ..»............... .. , ....,....,.. ,. - (f aetureofAppat) New York Sty',, Department of Environmental Conservation PERMISSION TO INSPECT PROPERTY By signing this permission form for submission with an application for a permit(s) to the Department of Environmental Conservation("DEC"),the signer consents to inspection by DEC staff of the project site or facility for which a permit is sought and, to the extent necessary, areas adjacent to the project site or facility. This consent allows DEC staff to enter upon and pass through such property in order to inspect the project site or facility,without prior notice, between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday- If DEC staff should wish to conduct an inspection at any other times, DEC staff will so notify the applicant and will obtain a separate consent for such an inspection. Inspections may take place as part of the application review prior to a decision to grant or deny the pen-nit(s) sought. By signing this consent form,the signer agrees that this consent remains in effect as�long as the application is pending, and is effective regardless of whether the signer,applicant or an agent is present at the time of the inspection. In the event that the project site or facility is posted with any form of"posted"or"keep out" notices, or fenced in with an unlocked gate, this permission authorizes DEC staff to disregard such notices or unlocked gates at the time of inspection. The signer further agrees that during an inspection, DEC staff may, among other things, take measurements, may analyze physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, soils and vegetation(taking samples for analysis), and may make drawings and take photographs. Failure to grant consent for an inspection is grounds for, and may result in, denial of the permit(s) sought by the application. Permission is granted for inspection of property located at the following address(es): 3773 Clay Point Road,Fishers Island, NY 06390 By signing this form, 1 c ffirrn under penalty of perjury that lam authorized to give consent to entry by DEC staff as described above. I understand that false statements made herein are punishable as a Class A nzisdemeanor pul-su mt to Section M45, PenalLatin.x Leslie Goss for LCMG FINY, LLC � Print Name and Title Signature Date ' 'rhe signer of this form must be an individual or authorized representative of a legal entity that: • owns fee title and is in possession of the property identified above; • maintains possessory interest in the property through a lease,rental agreement or other legally binding agreement;or • is provided pennission to act on behalf of an individual or legal entity possessing fee title or other possessory interest in the property for the purpose of consenting to inspection of such property. Permission to Inspect Property Application supplement 12/08 Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS r 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for i proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. - I 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local i Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Towns 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or"no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency i review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, Iisting both supporting and non- supportin facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. F A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website(southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1 o00 - 2.1 - 14.1 i PROJECT NAME Dock Maintenance The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees 0 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate'response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g.capital construction,planning activity,agency regulation,land transaction) ❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g.grant,loan,subsidy) (c) Permit,approval,license,certification: Nature and extent of action: Maintain 151(+/-)LF of existing 8-FT wide fixed wood pier of which 120(+/-)LF is waterward of the AHWL, including the installation of 32 new pier support piles, maintain the landward most stone-filled timber pier support crib,and remove the outermost 4 support crib timbers. Replace 3 tie-off piles and install 1 new tie-off - 3 pile,all at and waterward of the Apparent High Tide line in open waters of Fishers Island Sound. Location of action: 37; ,::lay Point Road Fishers Island NY 06390 Site acreage: 1.1 Acres Present land use: Residential Present zoning classification: Residential 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: LCMG FINY, LLC c/o Leslie Goss (b) Mailing address: 11888 SW Breyman Avenue, Portland. OR 97219 (c) Telephone number:Area Code( ) 503-819-7818 (d) Application number,if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes 0 No❑ If yes,which state or federal agency? NYSDEC and U.S.ACOE C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space,makes efficient use of infrastructure,makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LNVRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. XJ Yes ❑ No [:] Not Applicable The project is to maintain the current dock facilities which have existed at this site since the 1960's. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LNM Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes 11 No 0 Not Applicable The dock facility and recreational 4 usage and essential transportation to and frog". mainland has existed at this site since the 1960's. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria X❑ Yes [:] No ❑ Not Applicable The project will maintain the use of the property for recreational boating purposes and maintain the aesthetics of the facility. Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No -x❑ Not Applicable Attach additibnal sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes 1:1 No 0 Not Applicable ' - - i The project will not have any affect on suitability of or availability of drinking water on Fishers Island.This project will reduce impacts on water flow and circulation and therefore be considered an improvement to the quality of coastal waters. F Attach additional sheets if necessary ! 1 f Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. R ❑ ❑ i �(Yes No Note ;plicable The project does not include any excavation. Existing crib stone will remain and continue to provide water column diversity,shelter for fish and shellfish and wave attenuation for proetecting and preserving existing habitat diversity. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy ,7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No[R] Not Applicable There are no air quality issues related to this prosect. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No H Not Applicable There is no solid waste or hazardous substances to be generated from this project. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ YeO No© Not Applicable The project is being conducted on private land of the Goss family. The Public Trust Lands and Waters constitutes the area between the Mean High Water line and Mean Low Water line and the resources are from the High Tide line,out.These environmen a resources are being protected by the design standards dictated by the NYSDEC and the U.S.ACOS.This project is consistent with environmental standards set forth in the NYS CAM Act. Attach additional sheets ifnecessary WORKING COAST POLI —'4S ' Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in ' suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Yes [:1 No ❑ Not Applicable I The project and the use,of the site are a high priority water-dependent use and have been so since the 1960's and provide a boating ! access point for the Goss family. i Attach additional sheets ifnecessary f Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island,Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No F] Not Applicable Please see attached supplemental narratives regarding preservation of the benthos ecosystem for this site and the expected short and long-term impacts. The crib filler stone will not be excavated or removed from the site but will remain to foster benthic community i diversity providing a uge for sma TISh and shellfish.. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands-in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies; Pages : 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ NoF)<] Not Applicable There is no agricultural or aquaculture use at this time and dock maintenance will not create new impacts for shellfish at the site. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No [X] Not Applicable 1 There are no energy or mineral resources on the site and no adverse impact to any adjacent resources,areas will be avoided by the current industry standards for dock construction so there will be no new or significant adverse impacts, in any case. I i t PREPARED BY Keith B. Neilson,P.E. TITLE Agent, Docko, Inc. DATE October 3,2018 ' O C ICO, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,[Nlystic,C C 68939•Fax:(860)572-7569,email:office@docko.com E I_, 1 October 5,2018 9 Michael J. Domino,President Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall Annex OCT 1 7 2018 54375 Route 25 L_ P.O. Box 1179 Sari+arc la,en Southold,NY 11971 Re: LCMG FINY, LLC Property, Fishers Island Dock Modifications Dear Mr. Domino: On behalf of LCMG FINY, LLC, we enclose herewith the following in support of his permit application for dock modifications in Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island,NY. ➢ Two prints each of plans titled: Project: "Dock Modifications" Location: Fishers Island,Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York Waterway: Fishers Island Sound Applicant: LCMG FINY, LLC Agent: Docko, Inc. ➢ Two copies of the Southold Board of Trustees permit application, Transactional Disclosure Form, Erosion, Sedimentation & Storm-Water Run-off Assessment Form, Short Environmental Assessment Form, LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, Full Environmental Assessment Form (SEQR), Environmental Questionnaire,Narrative,Location Map, Tax Assessor's Map and Photographs. ➢ One copy of the Property Survey. Two checks in the amount of$250.00 payable to the Town of Southold. One copy of each of the other applications to regulatory agencies (USACOE, NYS DOS,NYS DEC). I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable;please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, DO KO, INC. Ic Keith B.Neilson, P.E. KBN: cb Enclosure CC: Ms. Leslie Goss US ACOE NYS DEC: Environmental Permits NYS DOS File: 17-09-2876 GOSS