The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutExpanded Environmental Assessment - 2017 UEC� SI OCT 3 1 2017 r uold Town WPlanng Board Southold Town Expanded Environmental Assessment Planning Board Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York Silver Eel Cove OL CA i- 0 201C G 1 Google September 2017 o ECS [ flMC Fishers Island Waste Management District D P.O.Box 22 JUL 0 12011 Fishers Island,NY 06390 Tele 631-788-7455 Southold Town Fax 631-788-7451 Planning Board fiwastemanaeementClemail.com Gregory Thibodeou, Chair Robert Goodwin, Treasurer Sarah Malinowski,Secretary John Patterson Bruce Hubert VIA OVERNIGHT CARRIER Date: July 5,2017 To: All Potentially-Involved Agencies and Interested Agencies/Parties From: Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District Re: State Environmental Quality Review Act-Lead Agency Coordination Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island,Town of Southold,Suffolk County The Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District(Board of Commissioners or FIWMD) is a special district established by the Town of Southold for the purpose of providing solid waste management services to the residents and businesses on Fishers Island. The FIWMD currently operates two facilities on Fishers Island,including:(1)a transfer station located at 58 Town Road,and(2)a compost station and receiving facility located at 2760 Whistler Avenue. It is the intent of the FIWMD to consolidate the two facilities on the site of the compost station and receiving facility. As part of the proposed action,the FIWMD would undertake site improvements to accommodate the transfer operation, as well as modernize its current composting and receiving operations. Part 1 of the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) with a detailed description of the proposed action, as well as project plans, are enclosed. ' In accordance with 6 NYCRR§617.6(b)(2)and(3),the Board of Commissioners has reviewed this proposed action and has preliminarily determined that same is an Unlisted Action. The Board of Commissioners is undertaking coordinated review and has identified the potentially-involved agencies and interested agencies/parties (listed herein on page 2). If no objections or responses are received from the potentially- involved agencies, it is the intention of the Board of Commissioners to declare lead agency status on or about August 8, 2017. Therefore, please review the enclosed materials and advise in writing, of any objection to the Board of Commissioners serving as lead agency,no later than 4:00 p.m.on August 7,2017. All communications should be addressed to Beth Stern, Fishers Island Waste Management District, P.O. Box 22,Fishers Island,New York 06390. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact the FIWMD or Patricia C.Moore,Esq.at 631-765-4330,as special counsel to the Board of Commissioners. cc: P.Moore,Esq. List of Potentially-Involved Agencies and Interested Agencies/Parties Mr. Jim Wade, P.E., Environmental Engineer 2, Division of Materials Management, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation,SUNY at Stony Brook,50 Circle Road,Stony Brook,New York 11790 Ms.Carrie Meek Gallagher,Director,New York State Department of Environmental Conservation,SUNY at Stony Brook,50 Circle Road,Stony Brook,New York 11790 Suffolk County Planning Commission, H. Lee Dennison Building - 11th Floor, 100 Veterans Memorial Highway,P.O.Box 6100,Hauppauge,New York 11788-0099 Town of Southold Town Board,P.O.Box 1179,Southold,New York 11971 Town of Southold,Office of the Town Attorney,P.O.Box 1179,Southold,New York 11971(interested party) ,I Town of Southold Planning Board,P.O.Box 1179,Southold,New York 11971(interested agency) i I I i I II Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 -Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information;indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor;and,when possible,generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A&B. In Sections C,D&E,most items contain an initial question that must be answered either"Yes"or"No". If the answer to the initial question is"Yes",complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is"No",proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part lis accurate and complete. A.Project and Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities-Fishers Island Waste Management District I Project Location(describe,and attach a general location map): 2760 Whistler Avenue,Fishers Island,NY 06390 Brief Description of Proposed Action(include purpose or need): The FIWMD is proposing to relocate its transfer station operations and equipment from a Town-owned parcel located at 58 Town Road to its existing compost station and receiving property located at 2760 Whistler Avenue. The proposed action would allow for the consolidation of staff and facilities on one property. As part of the proposed action,the FIWMD would undertake site and facility upgrades to modernize its current operations,including an improved composting operation to decrease the amount of solid waste being transported and disposed of at facilities off-island(as there is no waste disposal on Fishers Island). See the attachment to this EAF for additional information. Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone:631-788-7455 Fishers Island Waste Management District E-Mail: fiwastemanagement@gmafl.com Address:P.O.Box 22 City/PO:Fishers Island State:NY Zip Code:06390 Project Contact(if not same as sponsor;give name and title/role): Telephone:516-522-2645 KGO Consulting,Inc.,as environmental consultant,attn:Kim Gennaro-Oancea,M.S.,President E-Mail:kgennare@kgoinc.eom Address: 626 RXR Plaza City/PO: State: Zip Code: Uniondale NY 11556 Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Page 1 of 13 B.Government Approvals B.Government Approvals,Funding,or Sponsorship. ("Funding"includes grants,loans,tax relief,and any other forins of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a.City Council,Town Board, ®Yes❑No Execution of leases TBD or Village Board of Trustees b.City,Town or Village ❑Yes®No Planning Board or Commission c.City Council,Town or ❑Yes®No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d.Other local agencies ❑YesmNo e.County agencies mYes❑No Suffolk County PIanning Commission-239 Referral TBD f.Regional agencies ❑YesmNo g.State agencies ®Yes❑No NYSDEC-SPDES General Permits and Facility Registration, See bottom of page. h. Federal agencies mYes❑No FAA-Notice of Proposed Construction(FAA Filed 9/2016.Determination of No Hazard to 7460-1 Review) Air Navigation issued by FAA on 11/7/2016. i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area,or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? ®Yes❑No ii. is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? ®Yes❑No ill. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? ®Yes❑No C.Planning and Zoning C.I.Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption,or amendment of a plan,local law,ordinance,rule or regulation be the ❑Yes®No only approval(s)which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • if Yes,complete sections C,F and G. • If No,proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2.Adopted land use plans, a.Do any municipally-adopted (city,town,village or county)comprehensive land use plan(s)include the site ®Yes❑No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes,does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action ❑Yes®No' would be located? "The subject property is a municipal solid waste management facility operating on the subject property since 1987. b.Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district(for example: Greenway ®Yes❑No Brownfield Opportunity Area(BOA);designated State or Federal heritage area;watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes,identify the plan(s): LWRP and 2 CEA's(Fishers Island and Peconic Bay and Environs) c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, ❑Yes®No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes,identify the plan(s): Required NYSDEC Approvals:(1)SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit for Stormivatcr Dischaiges from Industrial Activities(GP-0.12-001)(filing date is permit dependent),(2)SPDES General Permit for Stormwalei Discharges from Construction Activity(GP-0-15-002)(filing date is permit dependent),and(3)General Permit Registration-Consolidation of Facilities(Received Jan 2017), Page 2 of 13 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. ®Yes❑No If Yes,what is the zoning classification(s)including any applicable overlay district? Residential Low Density(3 acre)(R-120) b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ®Yes❑No c.Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? ❑Yes®No If Yes, L What is the proposed new zoning for the site? CA.Existing community services. a.In what school district is the project site located? Fishers Island School District b.What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? New York State Police c.Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? Fishers Island Fire Department d.What parks serve the project site? NIA-Municipal solid waste managemantfacility D.Project Details D.I.Proposed and Potential Development a.What is the general nature of the proposed action(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial,recreational;if mixed,include all components)? Municipal waste handling and management facility(improvements to existing facility) b.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 10.76' acres "Represents 9.33-ac FIWMD-owned parcel,plus +/-2.40 acres 2.7 ac,lease area(from Town),less the 1.27 ac b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned area to be leased to Town. However,project site or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 9.33" acres is limited to 3.23 ac. c.Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? ®Yes[:]No i. If Yes,what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units(e.g.,acres,miles,housing units, square feet)? % 418+/-(square footage)* *see Below Units: d.is the proposed action a subdivision,or does it include a subdivision? ❑Yes®No If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision?(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial;if mixed,specify types) ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? ❑Yes❑No iii.Number of lots proposed? iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum Maximum e.Will proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? ❑Yes®No L If No,anticipated period of construction: 5 months ff. If Yes: • 'Total number of phases anticipated • Anticipated commencement date of phase I (including demolition) month year • Anticipated completion date of final phase month wear • Generally describe connections or relationships among phases,including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: 'Item D.l.c: Proposed action includes an additional 6,900-sf of building area(existing building area:1,650 so for the mixing and maintenance buildings. However,the mixing building accommodates a composting operation that currently takes place and the maintenance building accommodates the current practice on-site. Page 3 of 13 f.-Does the project include new residential uses? ❑Yes®No If Yes,show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Famil four or more Initial Phase At completion of all phases g.Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction(including expansions)? ®Yes❑No If Yes, i.Total number of structures 2 ii.Dimensions(in feet)of largest proposed structure: 25 height; 50 width; and 90 length M"ng Building iii.Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: 2,400 square feet New Maintenance Building h.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any ❑Yes®No liquids,such as creation of a water supply,reservoir,pond,lake,waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, L Purpose of the hnpoundment: fl. if a water impoundment,the principal source of the water: ❑Ground water❑Surface water streams❑Other specify: iii. if other than water,identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: million gallons;surface area: acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: height; length _width vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure(e.g.,earth fill,rock,wood,concrete): D.2. Project Operations a.Does the proposed action include any excavation,mining,or dredging,during construction,operations,or both? ❑Yes®No (Not including general site preparation,grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i.What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? U. How much material(including rock,earth,sediments,etc.)is proposed to be removed from the site? • Volume(specify tons or cubic yards): • Over what duration of time? W. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged,and plans to use,manage or dispose of them. iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? ❑Yes❑No Ifyes,describe. v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? ❑Yes❑No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: b.Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of,increase or decrease in size of,or encroachment ❑Yes®No into any existing wetland,waterbody,shoreline,beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected(by name,water index number,wetland map number or geographic description): Page 4 of 13 H. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland,e.g.excavation,fill,placement of structures,or alteration of channels,banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities,alterations and additions in square feet or acres: iii. Will proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? ❑Yes❑No If Yes,describe: iv. Will proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: • expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion: • purpose of proposed removal(e.g.beach clearing,invasive species control,boat access): • proposed method of plant removal: • if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used,specify product(s): v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: c.Will the proposed action use,or create a new demand for water? mYes❑Ifo If Yes: "Based upon water bills for the 2 existing L Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: 55t gallons/day facilities. H. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? ®Yes❑Ko If Yes: • Name of district or service area: Fishers Island Water Works Corporation • Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? ®Yes[:]No • Is the project site in the existing district? ®Yes❑No • is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes®No • Do existing lines serve the project site? ®Yes❑No iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? ❑Yes Olo If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: • Source(s)of supply for the district: iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? ❑Yes®No If,Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • Proposed source(s)of supply for new district: v.If a public water supply will not be used,describe plans to provide water supply for the project: vi.If water supply will be from wells(public or private),maximum pumping capacity: N/A gallons/minute. d.Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? ®Yes❑No If Yes: i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: 55t gallons/day "Based upon water bills for the 2 facilities. A Nature of liquid wastes to be generated(e.g.,sanitary wastewater,industrial;if combination,describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): Sanitary wastewater iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? ❑Yes®No If Yes: • Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: • Name of district: • Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No • Is the project site in the existing district? ❑Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes❑No Page 5 of 13 tq do Carntsost Stat4ola \ � Fisla hers Isn n `n tgg- r T. s ,d 2 C1,;co. Google Earth 111 • :11 Fishers Island Waste Management District-Som Waste management Facilities Q |e Earth � � t5 800 Imagery Date:,oQ6 Expanded Environmental Assessment Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York p EC 0 �] T 20 7 thoId T P anning Boa d p E �J E UL ► 3 ! 2Ui� Southold Town Planning Board September 2017 C i' Expanded Environmental Assessment Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York Project Location: Compost Station and Receiving Facility 2760 Whistler Avenue Fishers Island,NY 06390 SCTM No: 1000-12-1-1.1 Prepared for: Fishers Island Waste Management District P.O.Box 22 Fishers Island,NY 06390 Contact: Beth Stern (631)788-7455 Prepared by: (Environmental Analysis and Planning) KGO Consulting, Inc. 626 RXR Plaza Uniondale,NY 11556 Contact: Kim Gennaro-Oancea,M.S.,AICP CEP (516)522-2645 (Legal) Moore Attorneys 51020 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 Contact:William Moore,Esq. (631)745-4330 (Facility Planning and Operations) Project Management Associates,LLC PO Box 271777 West Hartford,CT 06127 Contact: David S.Brown (860)756-0302 (Site Engineering and Design) Anchor Engineering Services,Inc. 41 Sequin Drive Glastonbury,CT 06033 Contact: Matthew N.Brown,P.E. (860)633-8770 (Environmental Investigations) P.W. Grosser Consulting,Inc. 630 Johnson Avenue, Suite 7 Bohemia,NY 11716 Contact: Andy C.Lockwood,LEP (631)589-6353 Date of Preparation: September 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................1 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ........................................................3 2.1 Site and FIWMD History................................................................................. 2.2 Existing Site Conditions................................................................................... 2.3 Project Layout and Design ............................................................................... Description of the Proposed Improvements.......................................................4 Gradingand Drainage............................................................................... Water Supply and Sanitary Waste Generation ...................................................9 Site Security and Lighting..................................................................................9 Transportation,Parking and Circulation........................................................10 2.4 Construction and Operations ........................................................................... 2.5 Project Purpose,Needs and Benefits .......... .............. 2.6 Required Permits and Approvals ...................................................................... 19 3.0 IMPACT ISSUES 3.1 TOPOGRAPHY......................................................................................... 21 21 3.1.1 Existing Conditions ....................................................................... 21 3.1.2 Potential Impacts .......................................................................... 23 3.2 WATERRESOURCES ................................................................................. 3.2.1 Existing Conditions................................... ..................................... 23 26 3.2.2 Potential Impacts........................................................................... 3.3 LAND USE AND PLANS ............................................................................. 4 3.3.1 Existing Conditions........................................................................ 44 3.3.2 Potential Impacts........................................................................... 5 3.4 NOISE AND ODOR.................................................................................... 52 52 3.4.1 Existing Conditions ........................................................................ 3.4.2 Potential Impacts ......... ............•••• 52 3.5 AESTHETIC RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY CHARACTER .............................55 3.5.1 Existing Conditions ....................................................................... 55 3.5.2 Potential Impacts .......................................................................... 55 3.6 CONSTRUCTED-RELATED IMPACTS ............................................................ 5 3.7 CULTURAL RESOURCES............................................................................. 64 64 3.7.1 Existing Conditions ....................................................................... 3.7.2 Potential Impacts ..........................................................................64 FIGURES (see page ii) APPENDICES (see page ii) Table of Contents-Page i of ii LIST OF TABLES Table 1 -Site Data for Existing and Post-Development Conditions ................................................7 Table 2-Slopes within Project Area...................................................................................8 Table 3 -Traffic/User Logs(Peak Days in July and September) .................................................10 Table 4—Required Permits and Approvals ..........................................................................20 Table 5 -Analysis of Proposed Stormwater Management Plan ..................................................40 Table 6-Consistency Analysis with the Town of Southold LWRP .............................................49 Table 7-Soil Sampling Summary ....................................................................................61 LIST OF FIGURES (Following Section 3.7) Figure 1 - Site Location Map Figure 2- Excerpt of the Suffolk County Tax Map Figure 3 - USGS Topographic Map,New London Quadrangle Figure 4- Groundwater Contour Map Figure 5 - SCDHS Fishers Island Watershed Protection Zones Figure 6- NYSDEC Freshwater Wetlands Map—No. 1 of 39 — Figure 7- NYSDEC Tidal Wetlands Map—Sheet No.748-570 Figure 8- NYSDEC Environmental Resources Mapper application Figure 9- National Wetland Inventory Figure 10 -FEMA Map Panel No. 36103COO 18H Figure 11 -Fisher's Island CEA Figure 12-Peconic Bay and Environs CEA Figure 13 -Land Use Map LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A- Part 1 -Environmental Assessment Form Appendix B- Topographic Map and Proposed Site Improvement Plans Appendix C- Consolidated Facilities Planning Report and Waste Control Plan Appendix D- Site and Surrounding Area Photographs Appendix E- NYSDEC General Permit Facility Registration and FAA Determinations Appendix F- Prior SCDHS Plans and Documentation Appendix G- Pre-Construction Environmental Investigation Report and related documents Appendix H- Correspondence and documentation from the NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation Table of Contents-Page ii of ii Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document is an Expanded Environmental Assessment(Expanded EA)prepared to address the relevant environmental and planning issues associated with the proposed consolidation of waste management facilities operated by the Fishers Island Waste Management District(FIWMD). The FIWMD is a special district established by the Town of Southold in 1952(then known as the"Fishers Island Refuse and Garbage District") for the purpose of providing solid waste handling and management services to the residents and businesses of Fishers Island. The FIWMD currently operates two facilities on separate properties—(1) a transfer station,and(2)a compost station and receiving facility for bulky wastes,logs and brush,and select reusable items available to the community. It is the intent of the FIWMD to consolidate these facilities on the site of the compost station and receiving facility, which has been owned and operated as a solid waste management facility for 30 years. The transfer station is located at 58 Town Road, Fishers Island and is part of an overall 178E-acre, Town of Southold-owned property (Suffolk County Tax Map [SCTM]No: District 1000—Section 12—Block 1 — Lot 18), which includes the Elizabeth Field Airport. The transfer station facility is located on approximately 1.44 acres at the eastern portion of the Town-owned land(see Figures 1 and 2). The transfer station receives municipal solid waste(MSW)and recyclables, such as corrugated cardboard,bottles,cans, plastic containers, and mixed recyclable fibers, from residents and the limited commercial/business facilities on Fishers Island. The compost station and receiving facility for other wastes is located on an approximately 9.33-acre parcel of land located at 2760 Whistler Avenue(SCTM No: District 1000—Section 12—Block 1 —Lot 1.1) (see Figures 1 and 2) (hereinafter, the "compost station" or "subject property"), but also occupies a portion of the above-described Town-owned land. Solid waste management activities at the compost station include the following: (1) processing (grinding/chipping) and then composting of brush, logs and yard waste in open windrows(which is then made available for purchase by landscapers and residents); (2)receiving of construction and demolition(C&D)debris,bulky wastes(e.g.,furniture,mattresses,etc.),electronic wastes (referred to as"e-wastes")and scrap metals,all of which are then transported off-Island via licensed carters to various disposal and management facilities in the State of Connecticut;and(3)operation of a swap/reuse area where residents can dispose of unwanted household items for reuse by others(e.g.,bicycles,furniture, and other similar items). The FIWMD shared office/maintenance building is also located on the subject property. There is no public collection of refuse or recyclables on the Island. All residents and businesses are responsible for delivering wastes to the FIWMD facilities. Other than the FIWMD facilities,there are no other waste handling or disposal sites currently active on Fishers Island. The only local waste processing activity is the composting program and the compost is then made available to the community. All other wastes and recyclables require transport off-Island, via licensed carters, to permitted facilities in the State of Connecticut. r� The proposed consolidation would allow for the FIWMD to manage all of its services and operations on one property (the compost station), and as part of the proposed action are improvements that would Page I Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 modernize its current operations to industry standards, including certain forward thinking changes to how solid wastes should be managed to reduce disposal volumes. Such changes include the implementation of single-stream recycling and diverting organic materials to an improved composting program,thus taken out of the disposal stream. Also included are safety and site repairs,drainage improvements,and improvements to site security. As a portion of the current facility is situated on Town-owned land, including the site access,the internal paved driveway, attendant shed, a concrete pad and portions of the receiving area, the proposed action includes entering into a lease for that area. The proposed lease area is 2.7± acres, although much of this area is and would not be improved as part of the proposed action. In exchange for the lease of 2.7± acres from the Town,the FIWMD would lease an area of approximately 1.27±acres at the northern extent of the subject property to the Town as such area contains a Town-operated sewer pump station. Upon implementation of the lease agreements, and for the purpose of this environmental review, the FIWMD compost station and receiving property would consist of currently-owned, 9.33±-acre parcel, less the area to be leased to the Town of Southold(1.27±acres),plus the area to be leased from the Town(2.7± acres),which totals 10.76±acres. However,the actual facility or operational area would occupy only 3.23± acres(hereinafter the"project site"). The implementing regulations (6 NYCRR Part 617) of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA)"requires that all agencies determine whether the actions they directly undertake,fund or approve may have a significant impact on the environment..." (§617.1(c)). As a special district of the Town of Southold, the FIWMD caused to be prepared a Part 1 — Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) (see Appendix A) and this Expanded EA to address the following topics: • Topography • Water Resources • Land Use and Plans • Noise and Odor • Aesthetic Resources and Community Character • Construction-Related Impacts This Expanded EA is divided into three sections. Section 1.0, of which this is a part, is the introduction to the proposed action. Section 2.0 contains the history of the site and the operations of the FIWMD, as well as a detailed description of the proposed action, including the purpose, needs and objectives of its implementation. Section 3.0 includes a discussion of the above-referenced potential environmental and planning impacts of the proposed action. Figures are included after Section 3.0. Page 2 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT 2.1 Site and FIWNID History Site History The subject property has operated as a solid waste management facility for approximately 30 years. Prior to its use by the FIWMD, the subject property was utilized for military purposes as part of the larger Fort H.G.Wright. An approximately 412-acre,U.S.military training and coastal defense facility established in the late 1890's,Fort H.G.Wright included 12 gun emplacements,small arms ranges,administration buildings,housing,and an airfield. The subject property was part of a larger coastal artillery station located along the westernmost portion of Fort H.G. Wright. Five batteries for various types of artillery were placed on the subject property.' These batteries included gun emplacements, subgrade concrete bunkers for the purposes of resource movement and communications, and lookout posts. Remnants of three batteries (Butterfield, Barlow and Hamilton)and one lookout post exist today. In the mid-century, Fort H.G. Wright was closed as a coastal defense facility and the land was transferred to various entities, including the U.S. Coast Guard, the U.S. Navy, the Fishers Island Union Free School,and the Town of Southold. In 1987,the subject property was transferred to the FIWMD for the purpose of providing solid waste management operations to the Island's residents and businesses. At the time of acceptance of land from the Town of Southold,the Butterfield and Barlow batteries were used for the burning of brush, construction debris and other materials(other than household garbage). In the 1990's, the burn practices ceased and the subject property transitioned to a receiving and composting facility. FIWMD History In 1952,the FIWMD(which was then known as the"Fishers Island Refuse and Garbage District") was established by the Town of Southold to provide solid waste handling and management to the residents and businesses of Fishers Island. At that time, solid waste was disposed of at the former Fishers Island landfill located between Oriental Avenue and Ferry Road. In 1987,the subject property was transferred to the FIWMD and its purpose was to provide waste management services that could not be landfilled or accommodated at the former landfill properly. Brush and logs, and eventually bulky wastes (such as appliances and furniture) and C&D debris, were handled at the facility. As the former(early 1900's)batteries existed in partial form and the cost of removal was not financially feasible,the FIWMD adapted the structural remnants of select batteries into its operations. Specifically,the concrete bunker walls serve as elevated platforms for its receiving areas and the concrete foundations house its roll-away dumpsters and bulky wastes. Over the years,the receiving facility began to accept e-wastes and provided an area for residents to 'US Army Corps of Engineers,Archives Search Report for the former Fort H.G.Wright,February 14,2007. Page 3 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 bring reusable items. The composting operations also began as a useful way to reduce disposal volumes and to provide compost to the community. In 2000,the FIWMD constructed the existing office/maintenance facility at the compost station. The Fishers Island landfill operated for some 40 years, until its closure in 1991. After a plan to construct incinerators and an ash landfill on the Island was rejected, the FIWMD proceeded with the construction of the current transfer station on Town-owned land. Now at 26 years in age, the transfer station continues to accept MSW and recyclables, while the subject property serves the variety of purposes described above. None of the facilities receive or handle hazardous wastes. Rather, once per month, the FIWMD coordinates with licensed carters to pick up household hazardous wastes for appropriate handling and disposal. The proposed project has been contemplated by the FIWMD for well over a decade, as acknowledged in the Fishers Island Strategic Plan 2007-2017 (see Section 3.3 of this Expanded EA). As the costs of disposal increase and the necessity to reduce disposal volumes has been identified as a goal by communities and solid waste management facilities throughout the nation, the proposed consolidated facility could achieve this goal for the wastes generated on Fishers Island. 2.2 Existing Site Conditions The subject property is located on the west side of Whistler Avenue,at its junction with Fox Lane. It includes approximately 1,200± feet of frontage on the Fishers Island Sound along its western property boundary. The facility entrance is approximately 0.2 mile from the Fishers Island ferry dock and is developed with the following: an access/internal roadway, attendant shed, elevated locations where users deposit waste into containers for off-Island shipment, shredding and composting equipment, as well as an area of the site used to manage yard waste, brush and other organic materials delivered by users to the facility, and a combined administrative and equipment maintenance facility. As indicated in Section 2.1, the subject property contains remnants of structures associated with its former use as a coastal artillery station, including two batteries (Butterfield and Barlow) and a concrete lookout post within the project site and a former battery (Hamilton) located in the northern portion of the subject property. 2.3 Proiect Design and Layout Description of the Proposed Improvements The proposed improvements are to modernize its current operations, including the implementation of single-stream recycling and an increase in wastes that can be composted and taken out of the disposal stream. Also included are site repairs, drainage improvements, as well as improvements to site security. Below is a description of the proposed improvements as they relate to function, with further details provided in the Consolidated Facilities Planning Report, last revised February 2016 and the Waste Control Plan dated May 2016, both of which were prepared by Project Page 4 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District Septen:her 2017 Management Associates,LLC and attached hereto in Appendix C. The proposed site development plans prepared by the site engineer, Anchor Engineering Services Inc., are included in Appendix B. (A)Transfer Station and Receiving Areas The proposed relocation of the transfer station and site improvements to accommodate such activities,as well as improvements to the receiving areas include: 1. Installation of four compactor boxes for MSW, cardboard, and single-stream recyclables. 2. Addition of portable bins to receive food/organic wastes. 3. Installation of five open top boxes (roll-off containers) for scrap metal and bulky wastes. 4. Relocation of a 240-square-foot(sf)modular building from the existing transfer station to the project site for use in collecting residential e-waste,discarded small maintenance equipment[e.g.,trimmers,hand tools],and similar wastes. 5. Placement of a 600-sf pre-engineered storage shed for use by the community to dispose of unwanted items for reuse by others (a"swap shop"). A swap area currently exists at the subject property, but items are placed outdoors and susceptible to weathering and damage(which results in reusable items having to be carted off-site for disposal). The swap shop would serve to store and protect reusable items. (B) Composting Operations The composting operations at the subject property are proposed to be improved as follows: 1. Construction of a 4,500-sf pre-engineered building for the purpose of indoor processing and mixing of organics for composting(hereinafter,the"mixing building"). The proposed mixing building would be located on the southwest side of the internal roadway,opposite the MSW receiving areas.Within the mixing building would be one or more grinders with hopper and stand to grind food waste,cardboard and other fibers, and a reinforced concrete bin'wall area to temporarily hold and mix organics before they are added to the composting process. 2. Installation of two concrete pads with a cover system for the enclosure of the compost heaps. The proposed cover system would provide for controlled aeration and moisture, as well as leachate collection. A mobile control box would be used to monitor the temperature of the composting material while maintaining adequate air supply to Page 5 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 maintain ideal composting conditions and to insure the heap does not convert to anaerobic activity. Collected leachate, if any, would be recirculated into the compost program to minimize discharges. A finished concrete compost pad would also be constructed. (C) General Facility and Site Improvements The proposed action includes improvements to address select needs of the FIWMD and to improve the overall functionality and security of the facility. Such improvements include: 1. Construction of a 2,400-sf pre-engineered building adjacent to the existing office/maintenance building for the purpose of providing adequate maintenance,repair and equipment storage space. Upon construction of the new maintenance building,the existing office/maintenance building would be converted to serve only as administrative space. Interior renovations and the replacement of select windows are also proposed. 2. Replacement and/or reinforcement of the bunker walls, including the installation of pedestrian guardrails along the elevated disposal platforms in accordance with OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) standards. 3. Demolition of deteriorating ceilings of concrete structures in two locations and the backfilling of these areas with soil. 4. Installation of a truck scale to use in weighing in-bound and out-bound materials. 5. Improvements to site security, including the installation of chain link fencing around the facility perimeter, swing gates at the entry, site lighting and security cameras. 6. Installation of a new, one-way, paved loop driveway extending from the existing access and the construction of 12 formal parking spaces adjacent to the attendant shed near the waste drop-off areas. 7. Installation of a stormwater detention basin,stormwater infiltration units,as well as a pump system and holding tank for on-site stormwater reuse. Rain barrels adjacent to the mixing building are also being considered for the collection of water for reuse in the composting operation. Page 6 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 t. As indicated in Section 1.0 of this Expanded EA, a portion of the current facility is situated on Town-owned land, including the site access,the internal paved driveway, attendant shed,concrete pad and portions of the receiving area and,therefore,the proposed action includes entering into a lease for that area (see Proposed Lease Limit in Appendix B). The proposed lease area is 2.7± acres, although much of this area is and would not be improved. In exchange for the lease of 2.7± acres from the Town,the FIWMD would lease an area of approximately 1.27±acres at the northern extent of the subject property to the Town as such area contains a Town-operated sewer pump station. As noted, upon implementation of the lease agreements, and for the purpose of this environmental review, the FIWMD compost station and receiving property would consist of currently-owned, 9.33±-acre parcel, minus the area to be leased to the Town of Southold (1.27± acres),plus the area to be leased from the Town(2.7±acres),which totals 10.76±acres. However, the actual facility or operational area would occupy only 3.23± acres and is herein, referred to as the"project site." Upon implementation of the proposed action,the land use and cover type(e.g.,impervious surface, planted lawn or landscaping, etc.) would be modified. Based upon the Proposed Overall Layout Plan (see Appendix B) and site data, as provided by the project engineer, Anchor Engineering Services,Inc,the land use and cover types would be modified,as indicated in Table 1 below. Table 1 -Site Data for.Existing and Post-Development Conditions Land Use/Cover Type Existing Post-Development Change Area of Buildings,Pavement or other 0.65±ac 1.44±ac +0.79E ac Impervious Surfaces Total Area of Lawn and 0.27±ac 1.15±ac +0.88±ac Landscaping/Planted Vegetation Wooded Area 0.51±ac 0.51±ac No change Area of Meadow,Grassland,and/or 4.79±ac 4.79±ac No change Brushland Non-vegetated(earth and/or fill) 3.50±ac 1.83±ac - 1.67±ac Wetlands 1.04±ac 1.04±ac No change Total 10.76±ac 10.76±ac N/A As indicated in Table 1 above,upon implementation of the proposed action,the area of impervious surfaces would increase by 0.79± acre. The total area of lawn and landscaping (includes the proposed stormwater basin) would increase by 0.88± acre, with approximately 0.7 acre to be revegetated with an appropriate non-invasive,native groundcover seed mix and left unmaintained. The remaining 0.18±acre would include an area of evergreens at the northern portion of the project site to serve as additional buffering to adjacent residential properties. The non-vegetated areas (comprised of exposed soils,primarily compacted)would decrease by 1.67 acres. There would be no disturbance or alterations to the areas of natural vegetation or wetlands found on the overall subject property. Page 7 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 Grading and Drainage The proposed action would include the regrading of select areas for the internal roadway, mixing building and associated composting pads, as well as for drainage and the creation of a stormwater detention basin. To the west of the proposed mixing building, slopes are proposed to be modified to stabilize unvegetated areas that are susceptible to erosion., As part of the proposed action, the area would be seeded with native,non-invasive grass mix and an erosion control blanket would be used as a protective covering to provide erosion and sediment control,to slow runoff and to protect and promote seed establishment. A gravity retaining wall is also proposed. The grading necessary to implement the proposed improvements would result in a redistribution of the excavated soils within the site, with no material expected to be removed. The existing deteriorated concrete proposed for replacement would be crushed and utilized as base material in the proposed internal roadway. According to the project engineer,approximately 2.4 acres of the 3.23±-acre project site would be disturbed, with modifications to the existing slopes primarily due to the construction of the stormwater detention basin, mixing building and internal loop driveway. As indicated below,the area of slopes of zero-to-10 percent would increase by 15,289± sf (0.35±-acre), with a corresponding decrease of 8,266± sf(0.19± acre) for slopes of 10-to-15 percent and 7,023± sf (0.16±acre)for slopes greater than 15 percent. Table 2-Slopes within Project Area Slope Percentage Existing Proposed Change 0—10 percent 94,055±sf 109,344±sf + 15,289±sf 10—15 percent 13,326±sf 5,060±sf -8,266±sf Greater than 15 percent 33,269±sf 26,246±sf -7,023±sf The subject property is without a stormwater management system. Upon acceptance of the property in 1987, the FIWNM made beneficial use of the existing batteries and tunnels with limited alterations. Precipitation that falls on the site infiltrates downward through soils (except that portion which is subject to evapotranspiration) or flows along the land surface downslope in a direction perpendicular to the topographic contours of the property and adjacent lands. In portions of the subject property, stormwater flows in to an abandoned tunnel system and is presumed to discharge off-site in an unknown location. As the proposed project would not result in a significant increase in impervious surface area(i.e., an increase of only 0.79± acre), there would not be a substantial increase in stormwater runoff. However, the proposed action includes the installation of a stormwater detention basin at the southern portion of the project site, adjacent to the site access and partially within the right-of-way of Whistler Avenue. According to the project engineer, stormwater from an area of approximately (' 45,000 sf(1.03±acres)would be collected in proposed catch basins along the internal roadway and then piped to a StormceptorO (or similar) system for pretreatment before discharging to the Page 8 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 proposed basin. The StormceptorO (or similar) system would filter suspended solids, free oils, floatable debris and other pollutants in stormwater runoff before entering the basin. According to the site engineer,the proposed basin has been designed to be the largest that can be accommodated on the site due to the existing concrete structures,foundations and subgrade tunnels, as well as the existing topography and natural areas that are to remain undisturbed. The proposed stormwater detention basin is partially situated within the roadway right-of-way, and thus, requires approval from the Town of Southold. Also proposed are stormwater infiltration units to collect roof runoff from the proposed mixing building. Stormwater runoff from all remaining areas within the project site would continue to infiltrate on lawn or vegetated areas. The FIWMD is also considering the reuse of stormwater collected in rain barrels and in cases where significant rainfall occurs,from the proposed detention basin. Water collected in rain barrels at the mixing building would be used in composting. A pump system within the detention basin would allow the FIWMD to use collected and treated stormwater for the wash-down of surfaces. Finally, leachate from the compost heaps would be captured for recirculation and use in the composting process. Water Supply and Sanitary Waste Generation Potable water is provided by the Fishers Island Water Works Corporation. Review of water bills from July 2015 through May 2016 indicates that the total combined water usage at the two facilities r was 20,101 gallons or an estimated average of 55 gallons per day(gpd). Upon implementation of the proposed action, the consolidated facility would be expected to use the combined volume of water(i.e., 55 gpd) with no projected change to the water demand. There are also no new water connections to the proposed maintenance or mixing buildings. Sanitary waste is and would continue to be accommodated on-site via an existing subgrade, individual septic system located on the west side of the office/maintenance building. The existing sanitary system was installed in year 2000. Based upon the "Project Density Loading Rates & Design Sewage Flow Rates" set forth by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS),the design flow factor for the existing 1,650 sf office/maintenance building is 0.06 gpd/sf (non-medical office space),thus resulting in a calculated generation volume of 99±gpd. However, the actual volume is less, based upon the reported water usage in the aforementioned water bills. There is no projected change in sanitary discharge as there are no increases in staff and no new systems proposed. Site Security and Lighting The subject property is currently without adequate site security measures. As part of the proposed action, the facility area would be enclosed with chain link fencing. The main access road would have a gate that would be closed when wastes and recyclables are not being received at the facility. r Fixed lighting would be installed on the proposed maintenance and mixing buildings, and pole lighting on select perimeter areas. To mitigate light trespass and glare, all lighting would be Page 9 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 shielded and directed downwards, at an intensity compliant with Chapter 172 of the Town Code (Outdoor Lighting). The proposed lighting would comply with the lighting standards set forth in §172-5, and would be subject to the review and approval of the Town of Southold Building Department. r Transportation,Parking and Circulation Currently, hauling trucks visit both the transfer station and composting station. From the Fishers Island Ferry pier, trucks travel approximately 0.75 mile to the transfer station. Upon implementation of the proposed action, hauling trucks would travel the approximately 0.2 mile distance from the pier to the subject property, thus removing truck traffic on Whistler Avenue to the transfer station. The FIWMD maintains user logs at both facilities. In response to comments received by Town Board members at a work session held in March 2016,the FIWMD identified the peak days at the two facilities in both July 2015 and September 2015 and the following table indicates the activities on these days. Table 3—Traffic/User Logs(Peak Days in July and September) July 3,2015 July 24,2015 September 25,2015 September 9,2015 (Friday) (Friday) (Friday) (Wed nesda ) Transfer Station Log Compost Station Log Transfer Station Log Compost Station Log 7:30-8:30 AM 9 7:30-8:30 AM 8 7:30-8:30 AM 11 7:30-8:30 AM 13 8:30-9:30 AM 13 8:30-9:30 AM 6 8:30-9:30 AM 12 8:30-9:30 AM 20 9:30-10:30 AM 17 9:30-10:30 AM 7 9:30-10:30 AM 15 9:30-10:30 AM 18 10:30-11:30 AM 18 10:30-11:30 AM 6 10:30-11:30 AM 13 10:30-11:30 AM 22 11:30-12:30 PM 11 11:30-12:30 PM 16 11:30-12:30 PM 6 11:30-12:30 PM 19 13:30-14:30 PM 6 13:30-14:30 PM 11 13:30-14:30 PM 11 13:30-14:30 PM 12 14:30-15:30 PM 12 14:30-15:30 PM 9 14:30-15:30 PM 4 14:30-15:30 PM 7 15:30-16:30 PM 9 15:30-16:30 PM 10 15:30-16:30 PM 2 15:30-16:30 PM 5 TOTAL 95 TOTAL 73 TOTAL 74 TOTAL 116 Based upon the user logs,the relocation of the transfer station may result in an additional 9-to-12 vehicles per hour at the combined facility(based upon the total number of users averaged over the daily operating hours). However,the user logs do not account for a resident or business delivering to the two sites on the same day. It can be expected that a resident or business selects a waste drop day when they travel to both the transfer station and compost station for disposal. For example,on July 3, 2015, some of the 18 users logged between 10:30 am and 11:30 am at the transfer station may have then visited the compost station within the same hour. Upon implementation of the proposed action,this user would only need to visit one facility, i.e.,the subject property. It is also noted that the transfer station is open only half-days on Tuesday, Saturday and Sunday, and closed on Thursday. The proposed consolidated facility would result in the availability of the transfer station services to full days during the week and half-days on the weekend at the subject Page 10 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 property. As such,the maximum projected traffic increase would be expected to be less than 9-to- 12 cars in a peak hour. Furthermore, upon implementation of the proposed action,there would be a reduction in the volume of waste to be transported off the Island, which would result in a corresponding decrease in the number of trucks having to visit the Island for waste pick-up and container drop-off. There are no formal parking areas on the subject property. Upon implementation of the proposed action, 12 formal parking spaces would be created for patrons to safely park and unload materials. It is noted that the adjacent roadway does not include formal areas for pedestrians and bicyclists. While the number of trucks (for MSW and recyclables) entering and existing the subject property would increase upon implementation of the proposed action, these trucks currently pass by the subject property when traveling to the transfer station. As such,there would be no new truck traffic introduced to the roadway. As indicated above, the proposed action is expected to decrease the volume of waste requiring transport off-Island, and thus, the number of trucks on the roadway would decrease. Regarding vehicular traffic to the combined facility, the maximum projected 9- to-12 vehicles in a peak hour on a peak day, assuming these vehicles do not already visit the site (as described above),would not be expected to result in significant adverse impacts. It should be further noted that, in 2016 and 2017, the full-time population on Fishers Island was 236 residents in 120 occupied homes,' and thus, the vehicular and truck traffic in the off-peak tourist season (from October through June) would be considerably less. As such, the 9-to-12 vehicles in a peak hour represents activity during the tourist season. 2.4 Construction and Operations Construction The proposed improvements and consolidation of the facilities are expected to be completed in five months. As provided by the project engineer,the FIWMD proposes to commence construction in the spring months and only after the site improvements are completed would the activities now conducted at the transfer station be relocated to the subject property under the consolidation program. Operations The compost station and receiving facility is open five days per week (closed on Thursday and Sunday) between the hours of 7:30 am and 4:30 pm (with the exceptions of Tuesday when the facility opens at 1:30 pm and on Saturday when the facility closes at 12:30 pm). Upon implementation of the proposed action, the combined facility would be open from 7:30 am and j 4:30 pm on all weekdays, and from 7:30 am to 12:30 pm on the weekend. From time-to-time,the l - 2 https://suburbanstats.org Page 11 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 FIWMD may elect to close the facility one or more days in a week based upon seasonal and other usage patterns. Waste Handling and Management Based upon records of materials removed from the Island and estimates of materials used in the compost operation(i.e.,brush and yard waste),the FIWMD's facilities handle approximately 792.5 tons of solid waste per year. Upon implementation of the proposed action, there is no projected change in total volume handled. Any changes in the amounts handled in the future would be attributed to packaging and disposal trends,population changes, and similar factors. A summary of the existing and post-development waste handling and management procedures is included below, as provided by the FIWMD and excerpted from the Waste Control Plan included in Appendix C of this Expanded EA. • MSW: MSW is currently received at the transfer station. Upon implementation of the proposed action,MSW would be deposited into a fixed position hopper and then fall into a chamber where it would be pressed and compacted hydraulically in the self-contained roll-off box. When full, the box would be picked up for transportation and disposal off- Island. FIWMD would use two compactor-box positions for this purpose, which would rotate as each fills up. Once the site improvements are complete,residents and businesses will be asked to source-separate food waste and similar compostable organics from the MSW stream prior to delivery to the facility. As a result, the amount of MSW received and disposed of in this manner, is expected to decline over time. • Mixed Recyclables (Single-Stream): Single-stream recycling is a system in which all recyclables are handled in a single bin. The FIWMD does not offer single-stream recycling to its customers because of inadequate space at the transfer station to add an additional compactor box. Currently, the FIWMD residents and businesses source-separate recyclables into three different streams:(1)paper and mixed fibers;(2)mixed bottles,cans, and jars;and(3)corrugated cardboard. Users place these three waste streams into separate containers at the transfer station. With the proposed consolidated operations,the recycling program would be modified such that clean, uncontaminated paper and fiber materials that can be shredded and introduced into the composting program (e.g., pizza boxes, egg cartons, coffee grounds and filters, paper bags, paper towels and rolls, paper cushion packaging, shredded paper) would be separated from the waste stream. All other recyclables (bottles, cans, plastic food containers,non-compostable paper,and similar materials)would be disposed as one single- stream and placed into a hopper connected to a compactor roll-off box. When full,the roll- off box would be removed by trucks and delivered to off-Island recyclables processing and " recovery facilities. Page 12 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 • Source-Separated Food Waste&Other Recyclable Organics: The FIWMD will encourage residents and users to source-separate and deliver to the site this new stream of uncontaminated food waste and recyclable organics for processing and introduction into the composting program. Portable bins would be located at the upper, resident parking area to receive these materials from residents and businesses. The FIWMD would use on- site equipment to move the bins into the organics processing building on a daily or more frequent basis. Larger deliveries, such as those from the restaurants at the two golf clubs, would be deposited directly into the organics mixing building by the inbound truck. Inside the organics mixing building, operating staff would introduce the organic materials into a grinder designed to process: (a) food wastes; and, (b) paper, cardboard and other fibrous materials. Once the organics are reduced in size,they would be mixed with other materials (chipped brush,logs and yard waste)in a concrete storage area within the mixing building. Staff may also add water to the mixture at this point to insure the composting mass is optimal for biological activity and decomposition. Staff would periodically add the fresh mixture to the compost heap by pulling back the cover and adding to the heap. Composting is now conducted in open windrows, which are periodically turned. With the proposed improvements, all mixing would occur indoors and the compost piles would be managed on concrete pads equipped with a cover system. As indicated earlier in this Section of the Expanded EA,the proposed system contains the compost heaps and includes an integrated air supply system and leachate collection system. A mobile control box is included with the cover system to monitor the temperature of the composting material while maintaining adequate air supply to insure the heap does not convert to anaerobic activity. Details on the proposed cover system are included in the Consolidated Facilities Planning Report(see Appendix Q. Logs and brush are also processed on-site with a mobile shredder and screener and such activity would continue upon implementation of the proposed action. • Bulky, Oversized Wastes: This category of waste includes a range of oversized waste materials including carpets, chairs and other furniture, mattresses and box springs, appliances, tires and other similar materials. Such materials are placed in a bin. Mixed C&D materials(other than wood)are also placed in this container. Metals are placed in a separate box for recycling. Once full,the boxes of recyclable and non-recyclable materials are picked up by truck and taken by ferry where they would be delivered to recycling and processing facilities. There would be no change in how these wastes are received and managed upon implementation of the proposed action. • C&D Wood Waste: Waste wood is placed into a dedicated container for transportation to off-Island processing facilities. There would be no changes in how this waste stream is managed upon implementation of the proposed action. Page 13 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 • Reuse of Discarded Items: There is currently an informal process at the compost station where residents can leave usable items, such as furniture, bicycles and similar unwanted items. The installation of a small modular building would allow the FIWMD to store and protect these items so as to encourage reuse of items in good condition. • Electronic or"e-wastes": The FIWMD receives e-wastes on-site and upon implementation of the proposed action,such wastes would be placed in a storage building near the entrance to the site. FIWMD would then periodically arrange for the removal and recycling of items received and stored at this location. • Managing Unauthorized Wastes: All loads of incoming waste material are inspected by a representative of the facility who has been trained in the methods and procedures of solid waste management and handling. FIWMD's staff has been effective in identifying unacceptable materials at the point of delivery since users are supervised during much of their on-site activity. Whenever this occurs,the item is rejected and the user is not allowed to deposit the item at the facility. However,unacceptable items may be discovered where it is not possible to reject the material prior to delivery and FIWMD will therefore be responsible for its storage and proper disposal. In these instances,the Operations Manager assesses the potential risk associated with handling the waste. If safe to do so, such waste is placed in the maintenance building until arrangements can be made for its safe disposal. _ If the Operations Manager cannot identify the material, or it does not appear to be normal material of the types accepted, then the material is promptly removed and handled by a licensed contractor/carter. Upon implementation of the proposed action, material on the organics building tipping floor would be inspected a second time by FIWMD staff as it is being processed. The staff are responsible for removing unacceptable materials from the tip floor and placing into a waste container to be located in a designated storage area inside the mixing building or into the MSW compactor unit. In most cases, unacceptable materials discovered in this area would not be expected to be hazardous, but rather they are not suitable for composting (e.g., plastic bags). FIWMD staff would also inspect material located in the unprocessed brush/yard waste storage area during processing. All procedures for managing unacceptable wastes would remain the same. 2.5 Proiect Purpose,Needs and Benefits As noted in the Introduction (Section 1.0) to this Expanded EA, it is objective of the FIWMD to concentrate its operations and resources, but also to improve its practices to reduce the amount of waste being transported off-island and to increase compost material for the community. The Consolidated Facilities Planning Report included in Appendix C of this Expanded EA includes a discussion of the purpose,needs and benefits of the proposed action and a summary follows. Page 14 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 1. Site Repairs for Improved Safety and Access-At the time of acceptance of land from the Town of Southold,the two batteries were used for the burning of brush,construction debris and other materials (other than household garbage). In the early 1990's, the burning of materials was phased out and the FIWMD invested in cleaning out the batteries, which included the backfilling of one bunker,rooms and tunnels in the lower levels ofthe batteries and the removal of a former railway track. The past practice of open burning in the bunkers in combination with routine operations has weakened the concrete walls and upper structures of the bunkers to the point of risk of failure in select areas. Since the facility is needed to serve residents of the Island,the planned wall improvements and other work would reduce the risk of injury as well as bring the site into compliance with OSHA(Occupational Safety and Health Administration) standards. The FIWMD would continue to utilize the current "bunker" footprint, but with newly constructed retaining walls and fall protection for the waste drop areas. The creation of parking areas also permits for safe unloading and circulation to the waste drop areas, which currently does not exist on the property. 2. Utilization of Current Infrastructure — The subject site has been a solid waste management facility for 30 years and contains the infrastructure that can accommodate the transfer station operation. Specifically,the existing batteries provide waste drop areas and the operational area can accommodate the proposed upgrades without the removal of vegetation or significant regrading. The site location is also well suited for the facility operations, given its general isolation from the balance of the Island to the east, which is primarily residential in nature. Finally,the proximity of the ferry dock allows for minimal use of Island roadways by arriving and departing hauling trucks. 3. Improved Functionality and Operational Cost Savings—The proposed consolidation allows for residents and businesses the convenience in delivering wastes to one facility. It also allows the FIWMD to consolidate its staff on one property and to implement waste reduction programs, thus reducing its operational costs. 4. Improved Availability of Services to the Community—The transfer station is currently open and available to the public six days per week(closed on Thursday)between the hours of 7:30 am and 4:30 pm(with the exceptions on Tuesday,Saturday and Sunday when the facility closes at 12:30 pm). The compost station and receiving facility is open five days per week(closed on Thursday and Sunday) between the hours of 7:30 am and 4:30 pm (with the exceptions of Tuesday when the facility opens at 1:30 pm and on Saturday when the facility closes at 12:30 pm). Upon implementation of the proposed action,the combined facility would be open from 7:30 am and 4:30 pm on all weekdays,and from 7:30 am to 12:30 pm on the weekend. 5. Reduction in Disposal and Increased Material to be Composted—Single-stream recycling and the improvements to composting facilities would result in an increase in the amount of waste that can be composted, thus reducing the amount of waste required for transport and disposal off-Island. The FIWMD is estimated to handle less than 800 tons/year of all materials at both �+ of its facilities. It is estimated that an additional 100±-to-150±tons of cardboard material,food Page 15 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 waste,paper and MSW could be composted each year,which represents an approximately 14- to-20 percent waste reduction from the FIWMD. The benefits of composting reduces disposal volumes, thus mitigating the associated impacts with hauling and disposal (e.g., trucking and disposal costs, truck trips, etc.), but also provides significant benefits to soils. According to the US Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA),composting"enriches soil,helping retain moisture and suppress plant diseases and pests, reduces the need for chemical fertilizers, encourages the production of beneficial bacteria and fungi that break down organic matter to create humus, a rich nutrient-filled material, [and] [r]educes methane emissions from landfills and lowers your carbon footprint."' 6. Improved Composting Practices-Upon implementation of the proposed action,the composting activities would be conducted on a concrete pad with a special cover system. The concrete pad with cover system will have in integrated air supply system and leachate collection system. The proposed cover system also provides for moisture control by protecting the piles from stormwater. A mobile control box would be used to monitor the temperature of the composting material while maintaining adequate air supply to insure the heap does not convert to anaerobic activity. Collected leachate, if any, would be recirculated into the compost program to minimize discharges. Details on the proposed cover system are included in the Consolidated Facilities Planning Report(see Appendix Q. 7. Reduced Truck Trak and Costs—As the proposed action would result in a reduction in the volume of waste to be transported off the Island, there would be a decrease in the number of trucks having to visit the Island for waste pick-up and container drop-off. As such,there would be a corresponding reduction in hauling and disposal costs. Currently,hauling trucks visit both the transfer station and composting station. From the Fishers Island Ferry pier, trucks travel approximately % mile to the transfer station. Upon implementation of the proposed action, hauling trucks would travel the approximately 0.2 mile distance from the pier to the subject property,thus removing truck traffic on Whistler Avenue to the transfer station. Currently, the Island generates approximately 50 tons/year of corrugated cardboard, at an approximate cost of$170 per ton. Upon implementation of the proposed action,the FIWMD would be able to incorporate corrugated cardboard into the composting program. The volume of MSW is currently 300 tons/year, at an approximate cost for shipping and disposal of$130 per ton. It is estimated that approximately 20 percent of this volume, or 60 tons, comprises food waste. The proposed project would allow for the use of this food waste material in its composting operation. Paper and fiber-based materials could also be composted,thus further reducing the amount of material to be hauled off the Island. Overall, it is estimated that an additional 100-to-150 tons of material could be composted, thus reducing costs, while also providing compost to residents and businesses on the Island. s https://www.epa.gov/recycle/composting-home Page 16 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 8. Stormwater Management and Reuse-The proposed action would improve site conditions with the installation of a stormwater management system that would collect, filter and recharge stormwater from a combined surface area of 45,000±sf(1.03f acres),which includes portions of the existing facility. The proposed action also considers methods for stormwater reuse, including (1) the installation of rain barrels adjacent to the mixing building for reuse in the composting operation, and (2) a pump system to use excess water in the proposed detention basin for the wash down of surfaces. Further, leachate from the compost heaps would be captured for recirculation and use in the composting process. Such measures would be expected to reduce the demand for potable water. 9. Improved Site Conditions - The proposed action would improve site-security with the installation of chain link fencing,lighting and cameras to protect entry by trespassers when the facility is closed. The proposed planting of evergreens along the northern boundary of the project area would also enhance visual screening. l 10. Consistent with the Goals and Recommended Practices for Solid Waste Management — In December 2010,the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation(NYSDEC) published "Beyond Waste. A Sustainable Materials Management Strategy for New York State"(2010 Beyond Waste Plan). Its purpose was the following: "New York State's Beyond Waste Plan sets forth a new path for solid waste management. The plan shifts from a perspective of focusing on "end-of-the- pipe"waste management techniques to looking "upstream"and more comprehensively at how materials that would otherwise become waste can be more sustainably managed through the state's economy. This shy is central to the state's ability to adapt to an age of growing pressure to reduce demand for energy, reduce dependence on disposal, minimize emission of greenhouse gases and create green jobs."(pg. 1) The 2010 Beyond Waste Plan seeks to create a sustainable materials management (SMM) economy that relies not only upon waste prevention by the individual generators,but improved methods by local governments and waste handling facilities to reduce disposal volumes, including the implementation of reuse, recycling, and composting and organic materials recycling programs. Reuse,as defined in the 2010 Beyond Waste Plan(page 124),is"the recovery of materials and products for the same or a similar use for which they were originally produced.It involves the collection and distribution of useful products, such as household and office furniture, food, building materials,books, sporting equipment and appliances, from those who no longer want or need them to those who can put them to use." As stated on page 125 of the 2010 Beyond Waste Plan,"[o]n the community level,reuse can be a low-cost, low-effort waste management strategy that provides great environmental gains. Because local transfer stations often already serve as drop-off sites for recyclables and waste, many communities have added structures at these facilities to allow residents to drop off products and materials they no longer need and Page 17 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 i take,at no cost,items they can use." The FIWMD currently maintains an area where residents can dispose of household items for reuse by others, but this area is outdoors and exposure to the elements (e.g., rain, snow) often affects the usability of the items. The proposed action would allow for indoor storage with the installation of a swap shop building so that items are protected and reusable. Single-stream recycling is included in the 2010 Beyond Waste Plan as an effective method to increase participation in source separation and reduce collections costs. Specifically,as stated on page 144 of the Plan,"[b]ecause sorting is easier for residents and large recycling containers are usually provided, single-stream programs have greater participation rates. Some single- stream system operators report that recovery rates increase by 20 to 40 percent above prior dual or multiple-stream performance when these programs are launched..." Also, "[b]ecause the systems usually involve semi-automated collection, larger volumes of materials and only one recycling truck(with one compartment), collection costs—one of the most expensive steps in the recycling process—are reduced." As previously described, one of the main objectives of the proposed action is to implement single-stream recycling and the subject property allows for the placement of required equipment for such program. Finally, composting and organic materials recycling is another recommended strategy for materials management. As stated on page 155 of the 2010 Beyond Waste Plan,"[a]s New York State moves to further reduce the amount of waste going to disposal, organics diversion offers an enormous opportunity toward that end....preventing organic waste through the redistribution of usable food,changing processes and practices to reduce residual organics,and other means provide greater social and environmental benefits than organics recycling." Key stated points with respect to composting and organic materials recycling are as follows: • "Organic materials in the state's waste stream contain rich nutrients that, when captured through composting or other recovery methods, can play an important role in rebuilding the state's soil structures.According to the US Composting Council,compost's useful properties lead to healthier soil and plants, better nutrient cycling and greater fertility and also aid in erosion control and storm water management...."(pg. 156) • "Organics recycling also plays an important role in combating climate change. Once in a landfill, organic residuals degrade and generate methane—a potent GHG. Because these materials start to create methane within days of disposal, some of the methane escapes before it can be captured by a landfill gas destruction system. Research compiled by the University of Washington's Dr. Sally Brown confirms that every ton of food waste generates an average of 6 tons of carbon equivalent, and that generation happens in the first 28 to 100 days—well before large landfills are required by federal regulations to begin capturing gas. By contrast, a Page 18 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management Distract September 2017 well-operated composting system will generate little if any methane." (pg. 156) • "When used to enrich soil, the application of compost increases soil's carbon storage capacity by increasing the formation of stable carbon compounds that remain bound in the soil for long periods. This storage also provides a GHG benefit."(pg. 156) • "...expanding composting to capture the substantial volume of food scraps and non-recyclable paper that are still being thrown away would significantly decrease the overall disposal rate in New York State." (pg. 158) As previously described,the proposed improvements would allow for the F1WT*M to compost organics that are currently leaving the facility for disposal. Overall, the proposed action responds to the goals and recommended practices set forth in the 2010 Beyond Waste Plan. It is to be noted that SMM is being addressed in solid waste management plans throughout the country. The "U.S. EPA Sustainable Materials Management Program Strategic Plan. Fiscal Years 2017 — 2022," published in October 2015, includes two of its four objectives as: (1) Objective 1: Decrease disposal rate - This objective focuses on tracking and reducing the overall amount of materials disposed, which would encompass activities targeting source reduction,reuse,recycling and prevention;and(2)Objective 4: Increase capacity of state and local governments,communities and key stakeholders to adopt and implement SMM policies, practices and incentives - This objective involves increasing the number of states and communities where SMM capacity has been expanded as a result of EPA's technical assistance and support. This objective also involves increasing the per capita quantity and/or quality of recyclables recovered for manufacturing and increasing the number of households with access to organic collection and recycling." The proposed action would provide an improved facility consistent with the USEPA's strategies to reducing waste volumes and capable of implementing single-stream recycling. As such, the proposed action is consistent with both state and federal recommendations for solid waste management. 2.6 Required Permits and Approvals As provided by the FIWMD,the proposed action is subject to the review and approval by the Town of Southold Building Department, as well as the following: Page 19 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 Table 4—Required Permits and Approvals Agency Approval/Permit Town Board Lease Execution NYSDEC NY State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(SPDES)General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity(NYSDEC GP 0-15- 002); SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Industrial Activities(GP-0-12-001);and NYSDEC General Facility Registration-Registration processed(1/31/2017)(see below) Suffolk County 239 Referral Planning Commission FAA Aeronautical Study—Filed September 2016—FAA Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation Received 11/7/2016(see below) In regards to the General Facility Registration, the NYSDEC has adopted the general permit program to simplify permitting and regulation of solid waste facilities. Under this program, the regulations specify operating and design conditions that the registrant must follow at the site, thereby eliminating the need for each registrant to re-create a full operation and management plan. A facility registration for the proposed consolidated facility was filed with the NYSDEC pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 360-11.1(b)(i). In correspondence dated January 31,2017,4 the registration was processed(see Appendix E). As the subject property borders the Elizabeth Field Airport, the project engineer submitted the preliminary plan to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in September 2016. In correspondence dated October 24, 2016, the FAA determined that the four building corner elevations for the proposed mixing building are not to exceed the following: Northeast Corner- 31 feet above ground level(58 feet above mean sea level);Northwest Corner-39 feet above ground level(66 feet above mean sea level); Southeast Corner—25 feet above ground level(52 feet above mean sea level);and Southwest Corner-32 feet above ground level(59 feet above mean sea level). In accordance with the FAA's determination, the building elevations were modified and refiled with the FAA. In correspondence dated November 7, 2016, the FAA determined that "...the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not have a hazard to air navigation..." (see Appendix E). In accordance with the requirements set forth in the FAA's November 7, 2016 correspondence,the FIWMD will e-file Form 7460-2,Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, within five days of completing the exterior building shell. It is noted that the NYSDEC letter includes the incorrect year of 2016. Page 20 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 3.0 IMPACT ISSUES 3.1 Topo2raphy 3.1.1 Existing Conditions Based upon the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map, New London Quadrangle (see Figure 3) and a site-specific Topographic Map prepared by CME Associates Engineering,Land Surveying&Architecture,PLLC(see Appendix B),the elevation of the subject property ranges from 4±feet(along the westerly border)to 28±feet above mean sea level(amsl). The facility,or project area of the subject property,is at 28±feet amsl at its highest point and where the elevated platforms and receiving areas are located,to 14±feet amsl at its lowest point and where the facility meets Whistler Avenue. The first floor elevation of the existing office and maintenance building is 16.9 feet amsl. Slopes range from relatively steep at the westernmost portion on the subject property to relatively flat in the central portion (in the area of the existing development). As indicated in Table 2 of this Expanded EA,approximately 67 percent of the project site contains slopes of zero-to-10 percent,nine percent consists of slopes of 10-to-15 percent and the remaining 23 percent consisting of slopes greater than 15 percent. 3.1.2 Potential Impacts The proposed action includes regrading for the internal roadway, mixing building and adjacent composting area, and the proposed stormwater detention basin. As indicated on the proposed Grading & Drainage Design plan (see Appendix B), the current internal roadway rises from approximately 14 feet amsl to 26 feet amsl with an area where slopes are greater than 15 percent. As part of the proposed paving of the internal roadway, the slope would be altered; however, the top elevation of 26±feet would be only slightly altered to 26.5±feet. The proposed action includes the alteration of grades on the western portion of the project site for the placement of the mixing building and composting pads. The topography of this area varies from slightly sloping to steep, declining from east to west, from approximately 24 feet amsl to 15 feet amsl. Its condition is unvegetated and susceptible to erosion during periods of heavy rain. The proposed Grading&Drainage Design plan(see Appendix B)includes regrading for the foundation of the mixing building and placement of the concrete pads. This area currently ranges from approximately 18-to-22 feet amsl. The grading program would modify the elevations to approximately 24-to-27 feet amsl such that the building and composting pads would be level with the internal roadway and receiving areas. To the west of the mixing building and composting area, the elevations would largely remain consistent with the existing conditions,but the topographic contours would be altered such that the contours would run parallel to the building line for the purpose of stabilization. These areas currently consist of exposed soils and are,therefore,susceptible to erosion. As indicated in Section Page 21 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 2.3 of this Expanded EA,the proposed action includes seeding with native,non-invasive grass mix and the placement of an erosion control blanket to serve as a protective covering,providing erosion and sediment control, to slow runoff and to protect and promote seed establishment. A gravity retaining wall would extend approximately 36 linear feet in a select area of steep slopes. The proposed stormwater detention basin would include the modification of an area of the site which currently rises from 14± feet amsl proximate to Whistler Avenue to 22± feet at its highest point, which runs along the internal roadway. The creation of the basin involves regrading for a top elevation ranging from 14±-to-16±feet amsl,to a base elevation of 7 feet amsl. The designed base and top elevations support a basin that can accommodate surface runoff from the largest possible area(45,000 sf, as discussed in Section 3.2.2 of this Expanded EA). The proposed basin would include a minimum topsoil cover of six inches on the side slopes and 12 inches along the base. Erosion control matting would be installed and the basin planted with a non-invasive,native groundcover seed mix. There are little changes to the topography at the location of the proposed maintenance building, as the current elevation within the building footprint ranges from approximately 18-to-21 feet,and the proposed first floor elevation is 18.3 feet. Due to the existing concrete foundations and platforms, the topographic elevations of these areas would remain unchanged. Upon implementation of the proposed action, the area of slopes of zero-to-10 percent would increase by 15,289± sf(0.35±-acre), with a corresponding decrease of 8,266± sf(0.19± acre) for slopes of 10-to-15 percent and 7,023±sf(0.16±acre)for slopes greater than 15 percent. However, the proposed grade changes would occur within the existing development footprint and would not result in changes that could create the potential for runoff to surrounding areas of lower elevation. The proposed seeding and erosion control blanket on the western portion of the project site would provide a permanent protective covering in an area that is currently devoid of vegetation. The proposed regrading would also allow for the creation of the stormwater management basin,which would result in the beneficial impact of containing stormwater from a large area of the existing facility. Based upon the above analyses, no significant adverse impacts associated with the proposed grading and topographic alterations would be expected. f Page 22 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 3.2 Water Resources 3.2.1 Existing Conditions Groundwater Hydro eog logy Fishers Island is dependent upon a sole source aquifer for its water supply with numerous ponds serving as catchment and recharge areas. There are three surface water reservoirs that provide a backup water supply to the Island: Barlow Pond,Middle Farm Pond, and Treasure Pond. A Hydrogeologic Report was prepared for Fishers Island in 1990 to"development an understanding of the aquifers on Fishers Island and their hydrogeology"and"to characterize the nature and present extent of man-induced alterations to.the quantity and quality of surface and freshwaters."' As described in the Hydrogeologic Report,the total area of Fishers Island is approximately 4.25 square miles and its hydrogeology is such that recharge to the aquifers primarily occurs within the center of the Island,at four identified groundwater mounds. The Hydrogeologic Report estimates the total recharge area on the Island to be roughly half or 2.15 square miles. i At thinner parts of the Island and areas close to the shoreline,the Hydrogeologic Report indicates that there is not a significant recharge to the aquifers. The Hydrogeologic Report considered recharge areas for the Island as being defined by elevations of 5-feet above mean sea level(amsl) and higher, as "groundwater below this contour begins to show signs of quality degradation and pumping in this area can quickly cause salt water intrusion problems." Based upon the groundwater depth map included therein (see Figure 4), the subject property is within a location where groundwater is less than 5 feet amsl. Depth to Groundwater Based upon the groundwater studies within the 1990 Hydrogeologic Report, the depth to groundwater at the subject property is less than 5 feet amsl (see Figure 4). According to soil borings performed in 1999,groundwater beneath the site was determined to be approximately 2.5- to-3 feet amsl. Specifically,as part of the application for installation of the current sanitary system located to the west of the office/maintenance building (see Appendix F), four soil borings were performed. Two borings (B-1 and B-2) occurred in the areas of the current office/maintenance building and sanitary system and the remaining two borings were within areas proximate to the proposed swap shop building(B-3)and the proposed stormwater detention basin(B-4). At Borings r s GroundWater,Inc. Hydrogeologic Report(1990) Page 23 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 B-1 and B-2, where ground elevations were 21 feet amsl and 20.5 feet amsl, respectively, groundwater was encountered at 18 feet bgs, or approximately 2.5-to-3 feet amsl.6 In Borings B-3 and B-4, at elevations 25±feet amsl and 19f feet amsl,respectively,no water was encountered at 13 feet and 14 feet bgs,respectively. However,based upon the findings at B-1 and B-2, as well as the Hydrogeologic Report,the depth to groundwater is approximately 2.5-to-3 feet amsl within the area of the facility. Potable Water Supply and Sanitary Waste Generation As published by the Fishers Island Water Works Corporation,the water purveyor on Fishers Island, the source of public and domestic water supply on Fishers Island is groundwater pumped from two wells located in the Middle Farms area that are drilled into the Glacial aquifer beneath Fishers Island. A backup water supply to the wells is surface water from Barlow, Middle Farms and Treasure Ponds utilized during dry weather periods. Based upon water bills from July 2015 through May 2016,the total combined water usage at the two facilities was 20,101 gallons or an estimated 55 gpd. Sanitary discharge is accommodated on-site via one individual sanitary system located adjacent to the office/maintenance building. The existing sanitary system was installed in 2000, when the FIWMD built its current office/maintenance building. Based upon the prior SCDHS application f and approved plan (see Appendix F), the calculated sanitary flow was estimated at 99 gpd. However,based upon the FIWMD's current water bills,the combined volumes at the two facilities were approximately 55 gpd. Article 4 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code - SCDHS Fishers Island Watershed Protection Standards Article 4, Section 760-452(B) of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC)establishes watershed protection measures for the Fishers Island Water Supply in order to minimize impacts of pollution on surface water quality and groundwater recharge. The SCDHS Fishers Island Watershed Protection Standards,effective July 31, 1997, includes measures for all land areas of Fishers Island divided into primary and secondary protection zones. The primary protection zone consists of the contributing watershed areas of the Barlow, Middle Farms and Treasure Ponds, the existing wellfields,the infiltration gallery to Barlow Pond and any future water supply sites. The secondary protection zone includes the remainder of Fishers Island. e According to the project engineer, the SCDHS septic design plan was based upon a presumed datum, with a correction factor of 77 feet to the NAVD88 vertical datum. B-1 and B-2 show starting elevations at 98 feet and 97.5 feet with groundwater at 18 feet bgs at both locations,thus resulting in in water elevations at 80 feet and 79.5 feet, respectively on the presumed datum. Applying the correction factor of 77 feet, as noted above, the groundwater elevation would be approximately Elevation 2.5-to-3 on the NAVD 88. Page 24 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 Pursuant to the SCDHS Division of Environmental Quality Map of Fishers Island Watershed Protection Zones,the subject property is located within the secondary protection zone(see Figure 5). Section 4.0 of the SCDHS Fishers Island Watershed Protection Standards sets forth requirements for land use and development activities within the secondary protection zone. Such requirements and the proposed action's consistency therewith are included in Section 3.2.2 of this Expanded EA. Stormwater Runoff and Drainage The subject property is without a stormwater management system. Precipitation that falls on the site infiltrates downward through soils(except that portion which is subject to evapotranspiration) or flows along the land surface downslope in a direction perpendicular to the topographic contours of the property and adjacent lands. In portions of the subject property, stormwater flows in to an abandoned tunnel system beneath the site and is presumed to discharge off site in an unknown location. Surface Water,Wetlands and Floodplains Published maps and information by the NYSDEC, including the Freshwater Wetlands Map—No. 1 of 39 (see Figure 6), Tidal Wetlands Map — Sheet No. 748-570 (see Figure 7), and the Environmental Resources Mapper application (see Figure 8), were examined to identify the presence of mapped wetlands on the subject property. The US Fish and Wildlife Service-National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), through its NWI mapper application, was also examined (see Figure 9). Pursuant to the NYSDEC published maps and information,there is a mapped freshwater wetland, designated NL-13 with an approximate size of 1.1 acres, located at the southwestern portion of the subject property, and straddling the border of the property to the south (Elizabeth Field Airport). Also mapped to the west thereof, is an estuarine and marine wetland,of approximately 0.76 acre in size, and is classified as "B2EM1N" (estuarine, intertidal, emergent, persistent and regularly flooded). The NWI also maps this wetland. As with the freshwater wetland, this estuarine and marine wetland also extends into the property to the south. As the subject property is bordered on its westerly side by the Fishers Island Sound,the NYSDEC Tidal Wetland Map confirms this State-designated tidal wetland, classified as Littoral Zone(LZ). A wetland inspection was undertaken by Richard Canavan,Ph.D.,PWS in May 2016. As indicated on the Topographic Map in Appendix B, the easterly boundary of the mapped wetlands at the southwest portion of the subject property were delineated by Dr. Canavan to identify the nearest extent of the wetland to the project site. Also identified by Dr. Canavan was a small area (approximately 580 square feet)of tidal wetland vegetation located in the northwest portion of the subject property. Based upon the delineations by Dr. Canavan and examination of the published maps, the project engineer has identified the subject property as containing approximately 1.04 Page 25 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 r acres of total wetland area. It is noted that there are no mapped or delineated wetlands within or adjacent to the project site. The Flood Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 36103C0018H was examined as to the flood zone in which the subject property is located (see Figure 10). Pursuant to the FEMA Map, the subject property is primarily located within Flood Zone X,which includes the entire solid waste facility area. Flood Zone X are areas determined to be out of the 500-year flood plain. Areas surrounding the developed portion of the subject property are mapped as being located in Flood Zone AE 10,AEI I and AE 12,which are special flood hazard areas inundated by 100-year floods. Critical Environmental Areas The Town of Southold contains twenty-three(23)NYSDEC Critical Environmental Areas(CEA), of which the subject property is located within two--Fisher's Island CEA and the Peconic Bay and Environs CEA (see Figures 11 and 12). To be designated as a CEA, an area must have an exceptional or unique character with respect to one or more of the following: a benefit or threat to human health; a natural setting (e.g., fish and wildlife habitat, forest and vegetation, open space and areas of important aesthetic or scenic quality); agricultural, social, cultural, historic, archaeological, recreational, or educational values; or an inherent ecological, geological or hydrological sensitivity to change that may be adversely affected by any change. Both CEA's have { their designations, as defined, "due to benefit to human health&protect drinking water." The Peconic Bay and Environs CEA encompasses the bays east of the mouth of the Peconic River to and including Block Island Sound, the land beneath the bays, and all land immediately within five hundred feet of the shoreline of the bays.' For properties within the Peconic Bay and Environs CEA, the Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan for the Peconic Estuary Program (PEP COMP) is consulted to identify the issues of concern and recommended actions to protect aquatic and terrestrial resources within the Peconic Bay Estuary. It is noted that the Peconic Estuary Program does not include Fishers Island.$ 3.2.2 Potential Impacts Groundwater Potable Water Supply and Sanitary Waste Generation Upon implementation of the proposed action, there are no anticipated changes in water use or sanitary discharge. As provided by the project engineer, there are no new water connections or I Resolution No. 869-1988 of the Suffolk County Charter. Adopted September 14, 1988. 8 Peconic Estuary Program. 2001. Peconic Estuary Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan. 866 pp. Sponsored by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under Sec. 320 of the Clean Water Act. Suffolk County Department of Health Services,Program Office Page 26 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 sanitary systems proposed. As described in Section 2.3 of this Expanded EA,the proposed action includes measures for the reuse of collected and filtered stormwater for on-site composting operations and the wash down of surfaces,which would reduce water usage on the subject properly. As such,the proposed action would not result in significant adverse impacts associated with water usage or sanitary discharge. Article 4 of the Suffolk CoupSanitary Code - SCDHS Fishers Island Watershed Protection Standards As indicated in Section 3.2.1 of this Expanded EA,the SCDHS Fishers Island Watershed Protection Standards set forth requirements for land use and development activities within the secondary protection zone. A consistency analysis with the relevant standards is included below. There shall be no manufacture, use, storage or discharge of any products, materials, or by-products, in a manner which may adversely affect the quality of water supply sources - The FIWMD does not manufacture or discharge any wastes on the subject property. The FIWMD stores MSW,recyclables,bulky wastes and C&D materials in dedicated bins,and licensed carters are responsible for the hauling and disposal of such wastes. The only material processed on-site is the composting of logs,brush and yard waste, which is mixed and stored on concrete pads awaiting use by the Island's residents and businesses. All wastes are and would continue to be handled in such a manner protective of water resources,which includes preventing precipitation and surface runoff from coming into contact with waste materials. MSW would be deposited into a fixed position hopper connected to compactor unit, where it would be compacted hydraulically in a self- contained roll-off box. Uncontaminated food waste and recyclable organics for processing and introduction into the composting program would be placed in bins located at the upper, resident parking area and the FIWMD would use on-site equipment to move the bins into the organics processing building on a daily or more frequent basis. Larger deliveries, such as from the restaurants at the two golf clubs, would be deposited directly into the organics mixing building by the inbound truck. The concrete pad with cover system would have an integrated air supply system, as well as a leachate collection system to recirculate leachate (if any) into the compost program to minimize discharges. Bulky, oversized wastes as well as C&D materials are and would continue to be placed into dedicated containers for transportation to off- Island processing facilities. E-Wastes would be placed in a storage building near the entrance to the site. Finally, the repair of equipment would continue to occur inside the maintenance building. As such, the FIWMD practices are consistent with this standard. Page 27 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 • The discharge or disposal of any hazardous materials or radioactive material except as may be authorized pursuant to a permit issued by the[NYSDEC]or the Department is prohibited-No hazardous or radioactive materials are discharged or disposed of by FIWMD. As indicated in Section 2.4 of this Expanded EA, there are procedures in place should FIWMD suspect a material to be hazardous such that the material is contained and is disposed of properly by a licensed carter. As such,the FIWMD does and will continue to comply with this standard. • The discharge, land application, burial or disposal of any septage, sludge, animal waste, animal remains or human excreta within 100 feet linear distance of any fresh water body is prohibited, except as permitted by this article - This standard is not applicable as no such materials are generated, stored or handled by the FIWMD. • The open storage of agricultural chemicals,pesticides and chloride salts is prohibited - This standard is not applicable as no such materials are stored or handled by the FIWMD. • Storage of toxic or hazardous materials shall be done in compliance with the requirements ofArticle 12 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code-The FIWMD does not store toxic or hazardous materials at its facility. Based upon the above analysis,the proposed action complies with the relevant watershed protection measures set forth in Article 4, Section 760-452(B)of the SCSC. Stormwater Runoff and Drainage Site Alterations The proposed design situates new structures and operational areas within the existing developed portion of the subject property, thus resulting in a minor increase in impervious surface area(i.e., 0.79E acre). Upon implementation of the proposed action,the area of lawn and landscaping would increase by 0.88±acre and the non-vegetated areas,which are primarily compacted soils or earth, would decrease by 1.67 acres. Based upon the changes to site coverages,the proposed action would not result in a significant increase in stormwater runoff. New York State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(SPDES)General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity(NYSDEC GP 0-15-002) The SPDES General Permit requires that a SWPPP for the proposed development and such SWPPP is to include a detailed erosion and sediment control plan to manage stormwater generated on-site during construction activities, as well as for post-construction stormwater management. In accordance with said regulations, a SWPPP would be prepared to ensure compliance with erosion and sediment control practices set forth in the New York Standards and Specifications for Erosion Page 28 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 and Sediment Control(NYSDEC,2016),as well as the water quality and quantity requirements set forth in the New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual (NYSDEC, 2015). Such SWPPP would also consider the requirements of the SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities, as discussed later in this subsection. Prior to the commencement of any construction activities on the subject property, the Notice of Intent(NOI)would be filed in accordance with NYSDEC requirements. Post-Development Stormwater Management Plan The proposed stormwater management plan(see Grading&Drainage Design plan in Appendix B) includes the construction of a stormwater detention basin and the installation of stormwater infiltration units, as well as methods for stormwater reuse. As provided by the project engineer, due to the existing infrastructure, including the concrete batteries and tunnels, as well as the site topography,the proposed stormwater detention basin is the largest basin that can be accommodated on the site, and is required to be partially situated within the roadway right-of-way. The proposed basin would accommodate stormwater from a surface area of approximately 1.03 acres (45,000± sf), or one-third of the overall project site. The proposed stormwater infiltration units would accommodate roof runoff from the proposed 4,500 sf mixing building. Overall, the proposed drainage plan would accommodate stormwater generated from all new areas of impervious surface and portions of the project site that flow to the tunnel system. As indicated on the Grading&Drainage Design plan(see Appendix B),the proposed stormwater detention basin is located at the southern portion of the site, adjacent to Whistler Avenue and the existing entrance road. Catch basins would be installed along the internal roadway and all stormwater would be filtered with a StormceptorD(or similar)system before entering the proposed detention basin. The StormceptorD (or similar) system is an oil-grit separator designed to filter suspended solids, free oils, floatable debris and other pollutants. As a pretreatment for detention systems, it functions to prevent non-point sources of pollution in stormwater runoff. The proposed stormwater detention basin is to be designed to an approximate top elevation of 14±- to-16± feet amsl and a base elevation of 7 feet amsl, thus providing four feet of separation to groundwater(based upon a groundwater elevation of 3 feet amsl). A riprap splash pad would be installed at the inlet to dissipate energy and for erosion control. The proposed stormwater basin would include a minimum topsoil cover of six inches on the side slopes and 12 inches along the base,and planted with a non-invasive,native groundcover seed mix. Erosion control matting would be installed along the side slopes. The proposed basin also includes overflow protection with a riprap spillway at Elevation 10. In cases of heavy storm events, stormwater would flow from the spillway to the existing municipal stormwater system located along the adjacent roadway. �. Based upon soil profile data obtained from borings performed in 1999(see Appendix F),one boring was performed(Boring B-4)within the area of the proposed stormwater basin. The recorded soil Page 29 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 profile from zero-to-14 feet indicates topsoil in the upper six inches,fine sand, some silt, little fine gravel and few cobbles to five feet, and fine sand and silt, little fine gravel and cobble from five- to-14 feet. Prior to construction, additional test borings would be performed to confirm suitable soil conditions and, if required, soil mixing or soil removal would be undertaken. The proposed drainage improvements also include the installation of subgrade infiltration units to accommodate roof runoff from the proposed mixing building. The preliminary design includes the use of Stormtech SC-740° collection chambers, which allow for optimal storage volumes in relatively small footprints, thus minimizing excavation. As explained in Section 3.2.1 of this Expanded EA, groundwater is expected to be located at approximately 2.5-to-3 feet amsl. According to the project engineer, the proposed infiltration units would be located at a ground elevation of approximately 21 feet amsl with the bottom of the infiltration units set at approximately 17 feet amsl. As such, there would be an approximate separation distance of 14 feet between the base of the units and groundwater, which is more than adequate for the filtration of stormwater. Prior to construction,additional test borings would be performed to confirm suitable soil conditions and, if required, soil mixing or soil removal would be undertaken. As indicated in Section 2.4 of this Expanded EA,the consolidated facility would receive and store wastes in designated containers or enclosed areas such that there is no potential for rainfall or surface runoff to interact with waste products. Compost piles would be placed on concrete pads and the proposed cover system would protect the piles from stormwater. Leachate collection for recirculation into the composting program is also proposed. Overall, the waste management practices at the facility are expected to mitigate the potential adverse impacts associated with surface flow and waste areas. Based on the current condition of the site (i.e., without a stormwater management system), the proposed drainage improvements would result in beneficial impacts associated with stormwater control and treatment. As noted throughout the Expanded EA,the existing infrastructure,including concrete batteries and tunnels, as well as the site topography and natural areas, restrict the ability to regrade all areas of the project site to provide for stormwater control. The proposed stormwater detention basin has been designed to accommodate the largest possible surface area and includes the areas where additional impervious surfaces are proposed. Stormwater infiltration units are also proposed to be installed for roof runoff. Finally,the proposed action includes the seeding of areas on currently exposed soils susceptible to erosion. Overall, implementation of the proposed action is not expected to result in any significant adverse impacts associated with stormwater runoff. Chapter 236 of Town Code—Stormwater Management The Town of Southold regulates stormwater management and discharge associated with land- disturbing activities and projects that involve a replacement of or addition to impervious surfaces. Pursuant to §236.16(A), all development, construction, excavation and landscaping activities regulated under Chapter 236 are to be conducted in accordance with an approved stormwater Page 30 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 management control plan. The performance standards for a stormwater management control plan, as set forth in §236-18,and consistency of the proposed plans therewith are evaluated below. (A) The site erosion, sedimentation and stormwater runoff control measures shall be appropriate for existing topography, vegetation and other salient natural features of the site. The plan shall indicate that the development will preserve natural features, minimize grading and cut and fill operations, ensure conformity with natural topography, and retain natural vegetation and trees to the maximum extent practicable in order to create the least erosion potential and adequately handle the volume and rate or velocity of surface water runoff. The project site is developed and used as a composting and receiving facility. The current infrastructure includes former batteries and tunnels,and a site topography established from its historic use. The proposed action situates a loop roadway, mixing building, maintenance building,accessory sheds and equipment on areas that are currently paved or within operational areas that are unvegetated. There would no removal or disturbance of existing natural areas. Upon implementation of the proposed action,the area of vegetation would increase by approximately 0.88 acre, including 0.70E acre of native, non-invasive plantings. Prior to and during construction, erosion and sedimentation controls would be undertaken to minimize the potential impacts associated with land disturbance activities. Pursuant to the preliminary Erosion & Sedimentation Control Plan and Details Plan prepared by the project engineer(see Appendix B), such controls would include stockpile protection, inlet sediment control devices for storm structure protection,silt fencing, and anti-tracking pads to prevent off-site sediment tracking from construction vehicles. On the west side of the facility,upon regrading for the proposed mixing building within an area that is currently is comprised of exposed soils as ground cover,that area would be seeded with a native,•non- invasive grass mix and an erosion control blanket would be placed thereon to serve as a permanent protective covering. The proposed work would provide long-term stabilization of an area that is currently devoid of vegetation,thus having the potential to carry sediment in overland flow. In accordance with the NYS Erosion and Sedimentation Control Manual, the blanketed areas would be inspected weekly and after each runoff event until vegetation is established to a minimum uniform 80 percent coverage throughout the blanketed area. The proposed action includes the construction of a stormwater detention basin and regrading is required in order to construct such basin. The proposed stormwater basin would include a minimum topsoil cover of six inches on the side slopes and 12 inches along the base, and planted with a non-invasive, native groundcover seed mix. Erosion control matting would be installed along the side slopes. Finally,the proposed action includes the seeding of areas on currently exposed soils susceptible to erosion. Page 31 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 Regarding cut and fill, the grading necessary to implement the proposed improvements would result in a redistribution of the excavated soils within the site, with no material expected to be removed. Also, the existing deteriorated concrete would be crushed and utilized as base material in the proposed internal roadway. (B) Site grading, excavation and filling shall minimize destruction of natural vegetation, the potential for erosion, sedimentation and stormwater runoff and the threat to the health, safety and welfare of neighboring property owners and the general public. As indicated in the analysis of(A) above, erosion and sedimentation controls would be undertaken in accordance with the practices set forth in the New York Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control (NYSDEC, 2016). The proposed drainage plan requires a portion of the stormwater detention basin to be partially situated within the right-of-way,due to existing site infrastructure and topography. All stormwater would be filtered prior to entering the basin and overflow protection is provided through a riprap spillway. In events of overflow, stormwater would be required to enter the municipal system. (C) Erosion, sedimentation and stormwater runoff shall be controlled prior to, during, and after site preparation and construction. During grading operations, appropriate measures for dust control shall be undertaken. As indicated above, erosion, sedimentation and stormwater runoff controls would be implemented. During construction,dust control measures would be undertaken. (D)Areas exposed by site preparation shall be protected during site construction with hay bales, silt fencing, temporary vegetation and/or mulching to meet the requirements of the NYSDEC Erosion Control Manual. As part of the Erosion and Sedimentation Control plan (see Appendix B), silt fencing, stockpile protection and seeding of areas on the west side of the facility would be undertaken. (E) Natural drainage patterns shall be protected and incorporated into site design. Where natural drainage patterns are demonstrated to be adversely affecting a beach or surface waters of the State of New York, as defined herein, drainage patterns may be altered in a manner which reduces the threat to such beach or surface waters of the State of New York, as defined herein, and does not create other flooding or erosion problems. The proposed action would slightly alter drainage patterns;however,stormwater would be directed to a proposed stormwater detention basin or infiltration units, to the extent possible. The proposed stormwater detention basin would include a riprap splash pad and riprap spillway for overflow protection. As indicated in the analysis of(A)and(B)above, Page 32 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 the proposed action includes erosion and sedimentation controls. The proposed action would not alter drainage patterns such that stormwater would flow to surface waters. (F) Site preparation, including stripping of vegetative cover and grading, shall be undertaken so that no individual building site is stripped of its vegetation cover more than 30 days prior to commencement of construction. Soils exposed or disturbed by site preparation shall remain so for the shortest practical period of time during site clearing, construction and restoration. As part of the proposed action, areas that are currently devoid of vegetation would be seeded with native, non-invasive ground cover. In sloped areas, the use of an erosion control blanket would be expected to provide effective erosion and sediment control. Also, during construction of the stormwater detention basin, upon excavation and grading, the area would be seeded and erosion control matting would be installed. In other areas where soils may be exposed, the construction activities would be undertaken to limit exposure time. (G)Disturbed soils shall be stabilized and revegetated or seeded as soon as practicable. During the interim, erosion protection measures such as temporary vegetation, retention ponds, recharge basins, berming, silt traps and mulching shall be used to ensure that sedimentation is minimized and mitigated. The proposed action includes seeding with native, non-invasive plantings and erosion control blankets on the west side of the facility,thus providing long-term stabilization. The proposed stormwater detention basin also includes erosion control matting along its side slopes. Also,as discussed throughout this Expanded EA,proper erosion and sedimentation controls would be undertaken in accordance with practices set forth in the New York Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control (NYSDEC,2016). (H)In no case shall stormwater be diverted to another property either during site preparation or after development. In appropriate cases, with the approval of the Superintendent of Highways, drainage control measures may be implemented in the right-of-way attendant to an adjacent Town highway, at the applicant's expense. Due to the existing infrastructure, subgrade tunnels, utilities, site topography and existing natural areas, the proposed stormwater detention basin is the largest that can be accommodated on the site, and requires a portion of the basin to be situated within the Town right-of-way. (I) During the construction period, disposal of stormwater runoff generated by development activity shall be handled on site. Baling, mulching, debris basins, silt traps, silt fencing, use of fibrous cover materials or similar measures shall be used to contain soil erosion on the site. Page 33 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 According to the project architect, the proposed stormwater detention basin would be constructed early in the development phase in order to accommodate stormwater runoff during construction. Proper erosion and sedimentation controls would be undertaken in accordance with practices set forth in the New York Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control(NYSDEC,2016),and would include silt fencing,stockpile protection, and inlet sediment control devices for storm structure protection. (J) All projects, regardless of the area of groundwater removal and/or grading, shall retain a natural vegetative buffer zone along water bodies, including wetlands and marshes... The proposed action would affect areas that are currently developed or areas that are currently cleared and used for composting practices. There would be no natural vegetation removed. Also, with the proposed erosion and sedimentation controls, as well as slope stabilization measures,the proposed action would comply with the intent of this standard to protect the natural areas adjacent to a freshwater wetland situated at the southwest portion of the overall property and the tidal wetlands associated with Fishers Island Sound. (K) Natural land features such as shallow depressions shall be used, wherever possible, to collect stormwater on site for recharge. The subject property is already developed and it is the intent of the proposed action to create an area for stormwater recharge. (L) Site designs shall minimize impermeable paving. As a developed site, the proposed action situates facility improvements within areas that are currently paved and in areas that are primarily compacted soils, thus minimizing the creation of impervious surfaces. Upon implementation of the proposed action,the area of impervious surface would increase by 0.79E acre, while also increasing the area of lawn, landscaping and native plantings by 0.88±acre. (4 Stormwater runoff shall not be directly discharged to surface waters of the State of New York, as defined herein. Stormwater pollutants shall not be discharged directly into a surface water of the State of New York, as defined herein, but shall be attenuated by using holding ponds, sedimentation basins,perimeter berming, vegetated buffer areas and other measures that reduce flow velocity and increase storage time. Pollutants shall not be discharged into wetlands. In addition, any filtering devices constructed as part of the drainage system must be adequately maintained in order to function properly. The proposed Grading & Drainage Design plan (see Appendix B) does not include the discharge of stormwater to surface waters. Stormwater runoff would be accommodated in a proposed stormwater detention basin,but would first be filtered through a Stormceptor© (or similar) system before discharge. A regular maintenance schedule of the filter system Page 34 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 would be established. There are also stormwater infiltration units adjacent to the mixing building to accommodate roof runoff. The proposed seeding of slopes and placement of erosion control blankets on the west side of the facility. (N)All wetland vegetation shall be maintained. Dredging and site construction should not disturb wetlands either by direct removal of vegetation or substrate or by the alteration of adjacent slopes that would undermine the stability of the substrate unless permitted by Chapter 275. Grading equipment shall not be allowed to enter into or cross any watercourse or wetland without an approved SWPPP, Department approval, or in compliance with Chapter 275. The proposed action would not disturb wetland vegetation or slopes within the adjacent area,thus complying with the standard. (0)Subsurface sediments shall be maintained to provide structural support for the soils of the wetlands. There is no proposed work within or proximate to wetlands, and thus,this standard is not applicable. (P) The elevation of a wetland shall not be altered unless it is part of a wetland restoration project approved by the Town and/or the Department. The proposed action does not include the alteration of wetlands. (Q)No vegetation required by any agency as a buffer to a natural protective feature shall be disturbed by grading, erosion, sedimentation, or direct removal of vegetation. The proposed action would affect only those areas that are currently developed, cleared and part of the overall facility. There would be no natural vegetation removed. (R) Fill shall not encroach on natural watercourses, constructed channels, wetlands, or floodway areas. All fill shall be compacted at a final angle of repose which provides stability for the material, minimizes erosion and prevents settlement. All temporary stockpiles and/or graded areas shall be protected with erosion control measures to include, but not be limited to, hay bales, silt fencing, and vegetation to meet the minimum requirements of the New York State Stormwater Design Manual. The grading program does not include the use of fill. All excavated soils would be used on-site. The proposed erosion and sedimentation controls would include silt fencing, soil stockpile protection, as well as the seeding and placement of erosion control blankets for stabilization on the western portion of the facility. Page 35 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 (S) Trails and walking paths along water bodies shall be sited and constructed so they are not a source of sediment, as maybe required by Chapter 275C21 and/or as part of an approved SWPPP. As an existing solid waste management facility, there are no proposed trails or walking paths, and thus,this standard is not applicable. (T) The amount and velocity of runoff from a site after development shall approximate its predevelopment characteristics. However, if the site is adjacent to coastal waters, stormwater shall be contained on site, to the maximum extent practicable, to prevent direct discharge of runoff to coastal waters. The proposed action would increase the areas of impervious surfaces by 0.79±acre,while also increasing the area of lawn, landscaping and native grasses and plantings, by 0.88± acre. Areas of exposed soils would decrease by 1.67 acres. At present, precipitation that falls on the site infiltrates downward through soils or flows along the land surface downslope in a direction perpendicular to the topographic contours of the property and adjacent lands. In portions of the subject property, stormwater flows to an abandoned tunnel system and is presumed to discharge off site in an unknown location.The proposed Grading&Drainage Design plan(see Appendix B)would improve conditions on the site by capturing and filtering stormwater before discharge to a proposed detention basin. As noted, the proposed basin has been designed to be the largest that can be accommodated on the site due to the existing concrete structures, foundations and subgrade tunnels, as j well as the existing topography and natural areas. Roof runoff from the proposed mixing building would be accommodated in subgrade infiltration units. Three is no proposed direct discharge of stormwater to any surface waters. Finally,the proposed erosion control blanket would be placed as a permanent protective covering to aid in controlling erosion and withstand overland flow as well as to protect and promote seed establishment. (U)Natural floodplain and drainage swales shall not be altered or disturbed in a manner which decreases their ability to accommodate and channel stormwater runoff and floodwaters. If no practicable alternative to the location of development, roadway, driveways, and similar surfaces within these areas exists, such facilities shall be sited and constructed to minimize and mitigate the amount and velocity of stormwater entering the channel,floodplain or Swale and to approximate the original functions of the undisturbed condition. The proposed action does not include the alteration or disturbance of natural floodplains or drainage swales. All improvements would occur within the existing developed area located outside of the 500-year floodplain. Page 36 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 (V) No land having a slope equal to or greater than 20%shall be developed or disturbed except for conservation measures or measures intended to remove debris which inhibits the functioning of natural or engineered drainage and erosion control measures except access ways to shorelines permitted by Chapter 275. Natural vegetation and topography shall be retained to stabilize soils and reduce the volume of stormwater overflow. The proposed action would not affect slopes equal to or greater than 20 percent. (W)On lands having slopes of less than 20% but composed of highly erodible soils, development proposals shall include consideration of the load-bearing capacity of the soils. Unless it can be demonstrated that the soils can be stabilized with a minimum of on- site disturbance and no adverse impacts to the stability of neighboring properties, the development proposal shall not be approved as submitted. Slope stabilization measures are proposed to the west of the mixing building with regrading and plantings, as well as the installation of a gravity retaining wall. The stabilization of the side slopes within the basin would be achieved with erosion control matting and a similar native, non-invasive seed mix. In select areas,retaining walls would be replaced, with no changes to the slopes. As such, the proposed action complies with the intent of this standard. (X)All permanent and/or final vegetation and mechanical erosion control measures called for in approved plans shall be installed within the time limits specified by the Stormwater Management Officer, and no later than the time limits specified by the Stormwater Management Officer or noted in the stormwater management control plan. The proposed action would comply with this standard. Based upon the above analyses,the proposed development plans are consistent with the goals and standards set forth in Chapter 236 of the Town Code. SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities(GP-0-12-001) The consolidated facility is a regulated land use under Sector N [Scrap Recycling Facilities, Including Transfer Stations Accepting Household Recyclables]of the SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit for stormwater discharges associated with industrial activities. Prior to filing for coverage under this General Permit, the NYSDEC requires that a SWPPP be prepared. The SPDES Multi- Sector General Permit sets forth best management practices (BMPs)for inclusion in SWPPPs for all Sector N uses as they relate to an appropriate inbound waste control program; as well as to minimize the contact of surface runoff with particulate matter (stored indoors or under cover), stockpiled materials, processed materials and non-recyclable wastes, and residual liquids and fluids. There are additional S WPPP requirements for the FIWMD facility,as a transfer station with Page 37 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 recycling activities, with respect to the inbound waste control and recyclable programs, residual fluids, spill and leak prevention, and effluent limitations for facilities that operate a shredder. As indicated in this section as well as in Section 2.4, the consolidated facility would receive and store wastes in designated containers or enclosed areas such that there is no potential for surface runoff to interact with waste products. With the proposed improvements, all mixing would occur indoors and the compost piles would be managed on concrete pads equipped with a cover system. Leachate collection for recirculation into the composting program is also proposed. All maintenance activities would occur inside the proposed maintenance building. Finally, the FIWMD does not handle or store toxic or hazardous wastes and has strict procedures in the event such materials are inadvertently received. Regarding stormwater management, the proposed stormwater management system includes a Stormceptor© (or similar) system to filter suspended solids,free oils,floatable debris and other pollutants in stormwater runoff before entering the basin. Accordingly, the proposed improvements and waste management procedures are consistent with the required elements of the SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit. Prior to the commencement of any construction activities on the subject property, the Notice of Intent (NOI) would be filed in accordance with NYSDEC requirements. New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual,NYSDEC(January 2015) The 2015 Stormwater Management Design Manual provides a general overview on the planning and design of stormwater management practices (SMPs) that comply with NYS stormwater performance standards. Its stated purpose is threefold: 1. To protect the waters of the State of New York from the adverse impacts of urban stormwater runoff 2. To provide design standards on the most effective stormwater management approaches including. • Incorporation ofgreen in achieved by infiltration, groundwater recharge, reuse, recycle, evaporation/evapotranspiration through the use of green infrastructure techniques as a standard practice • Design and implementation of standard stormwater management practices (SMPs) • Implementation of a good operation, inspection, and maintenance program 3. To improve the quality of green infrastructure and SMPs constructed in the State, specifically in regard to their performance, longevity, safety, ease of maintenance, community acceptance'and environmental benefit Page 38 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 -1 the 2015 Stormwater Management Desi Manual " the first step in As stated on page 5 of g Design [] p planning for stormwater management using green infrastructure is to avoid or minimize land disturbance by preserving natural areas. Development should be strategically located based on the location of resource areas and physical conditions at a site." The"[p]reservation of natural features includes techniques to foster the identification and preservation of natural-areas that can be used in the protection of water,habitat and vegetative resources. Conservation design includes laying out the elements of a development project in such a way that the site design takes advantage of a site's natural features, preserves the more sensitive areas and identifies any site constraints and opportunities to prevent or reduce negative effects of development." The techniques for the preservation of natural features and conservation, as outlined in Table 5.1 of the New York State Stormwater Manual,include:preservation of undisturbed areas;preservation of naturally vegetated buffers; reduction of clearing and grading by limiting the minimum amount needed for the development function, road access and infrastructure (e.g., utilities, wastewater disposal, stormwater management), thus resulting in the disturbance to the smallest possible land area; locating development in less sensitive areas; open space design; and soil restoration. As the project site contains a use regulated under Sector N [Scrap Recycling Facilities, Including Transfer Stations Accepting Household Recyclables] of the SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit (GP-0-12-001) for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities, such use is classified as a "stormwater hotspot." As defined in the 2015 Stormwater Management Design Manual, a stormwater hotspot is considered "a land use or activity that generates higher concentrations of hydrocarbons, trace metals or toxicants than are found in typical stormwater runoff.... If a site is designated as a hotspot, it has important implications for how stormwater is managed. First and foremost, stormwater runoff from hotspots cannot be allowed to infiltrate untreated into groundwater, where it may contaminate water supplies. Second, a greater level of stormwater treatment for hydrocarbons, trace metals or toxicants of concern is needed at hotspot sites to prevent pollutant washoff after construction. This treatment typically involves preparing and implementing a stormwater pollution prevention plan that includes a series of operational practices at the site that reduce the generation of pollutants from a site or prevent contact of rainfall with the pollutants." The 2015 Stormwater Management Design Manual includes requirements and restrictions on SMPs for hotspot uses. As excerpted from Chapter 6,the required elements and design guidelines for the proposed stormwater detention basin and infiltration units are included in Table 5 herein. Page 39 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 Table 5-Analysis of Proposed Stormwater Management Plan Required Elements Proposed Action Stormwater Infiltration—Feasibility Underlying soils shall have Prior to undertaking any construction activities and filing for the General Permit, an infiltration rate(fc)of at soil borings would be performed to confirm suitable soil conditions. least 0.5 inches per hour... Soils shall have a clay Based upon soil borings performed in 1999,there is no clay present. Soils are content of less than 20% comprised of fine sand,some silt,fine gravel and few or occasional cobbles. Prior and a silt/clay content of to construction of the stormwater detention basin,additional borings would be less than 40%. performed to confirm suitable soil conditions. Cannot be located on areas The proposed stormwater detention basin would require the regrading of areas where with natural slopes greater slopes are greater than 15 percent;however,according to the project engineer,there than 15%. is no alternate location available. At present,there is no stormwater treatment,and thus,the creation of the proposed basin would improve the existing condition. Cannot be located in fill No fill soils are proposed to be imported. soils,except the top quarter of an infiltration trench or dry well. To protect groundwater The subject property has been used for solid waste management for 30 years with no from possible stormwater management controls. Stormwater enters an abandoned tunnel system contamination,runoff from that runs throughout the site and discharges at unknown locations. The proposed designated hotspot land uses drainage plan includes stormwater infiltration units for roof runoff,as well as an or activities must not be integrated system of catch basins with a pretreatment system before discharge to a directed to a formal proposed stormwater detention basin. The proposed basin is designed with a topsoil infiltration facility. In cases cover of six inches(minimum)on the side slopes and 12 inches along the base,and where this goal is planted with a non-invasive,native groundcover seed mix. According to the project impossible...redundant engineer,there would be a separation distance of 4 feet between the basin and pretreatment must be groundwater. provided by applying two of the practices listed in Table The proposed action would not impact naturally vegetated areas,situates all 5.1 in series,both of which improvements on areas that are currently developed or within the operational areas are sized to treat the entire of the facility,and proposes slope stabilization measures along the west side of the WQv. facility to protect natural areas beyond the facility. The waste control practices at the facility would also ensure that wastes are contained to protect these areas from rainfall or surface flow. Bottom of the infiltration The subject property is located within a designated sole source aquifer,and thus,the facility to be separated by at proposed stormwater detention basin would be designed such that there is a four- least three feet vertically foot separation distance to groundwater. from the seasonally high water table or bedrock layer, as documented by on-site soil testing.(Four feet in sole source aquifers). Page 40 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Fac:hhes Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 Storinwater Infiltration—Design Guidelines The maximum contributing The proposed stormwater detention basin would accommodate an area of area to infiltration basins or approximately 1.03 acres. trenches should generally be less than five acres. The maximum drainage area The proposed stormwater infiltration units would accommodate roof runoff from the to dry wells should mixing building only. generally be smaller than one acre,and should include rooftop runoff only. Overall, the proposed stormwater management plan has been designed to pretreat and accommodate stormwater from an existing facility that currently does not have formal areas for recharge. The abandoned tunnel system that predates the use as a solid waste management facility is currently receiving stormwater,which would cease upon implementation of the proposed action. Also,the consolidated facility is designed to receive and store wastes in designated containers or enclosed areas such that rainfall does not come into contact with waste products. Compost piles would be placed on concrete pads and a cover system with leachate collection is proposed. All maintenance activities would occur inside the proposed maintenance building. Finally, the FIWMD does not handle or store toxic or hazardous wastes and has strict procedures in the event such materials are inadvertently received. Accordingly,no significant adverse impacts associated with stormwater runoff would be expected. Notwithstanding,the FIWMD would file a Notice of Intent(NOI)for coverage under the SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit,thus ensuring a plan protective of water resources. Surface Water,Wetlands and Floodplains Pursuant to the implementing regulations of the Tidal Wetlands Act, at 6 NYCRR §661.4(b)(1), the NYSDEC-regulated"Adjacent area"is that area"immediately adjacent to a tidal wetland within whichever of the following limits is closest to the most landward tidal wetland boundary...(i)300 feet landward of said most landward boundary of a tidal wetland...; or(ii)to the seaward edge of the closest lawfully and presently existing(i.e., as of August 20, 1977),functional and substantial fabricated structure...which lies generally parallel to said most tidal wetland landward boundary and which is a minimum of 100 feet in length as measured generally parallel to such most landward boundary,but not including individual buildings...;or(iii)to the elevation contour of IO feet above mean sea level, except when such contour crosses the seaward face of a bluff or cliff, or crosses a hill on which the slope equals or exceeds the natural angle of repose of the soil, then to the topographic crest of such bluff, cliff, or hill..." (Emphasis added) As indicated in the Overall Layout Plan(see Appendix B),the project site is located landward of the 10-foot elevation contour, and thus,no activities would occur within the regulated adjacent area. Page 41 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 wetland exists at the southwest portion of the subject roe A freshwater w p � property.rty. Pursuant to the implementing regulations of the Freshwater Wetlands Act, at 6 NYCRR §663.2(b), the regulated "Adjacent area" means "those areas of land or water that are outside a wetland and within 100 feet..., measured horizontally, of the boundary of the wetland. Based upon the proposed Overall Layout Plan and Drainage&Grading Design plan (see Appendix B),the limit of disturbance and grading is the gravity retaining wall, which would be located approximately 125 feet from the mapped boundary of the freshwater wetland. The location of the proposed gravity wall is currently cleared, and thus, does not require the removal of any vegetation. Also, the proposed project incorporates erosion control blankets to stabilize soils and enhance re-vegetation on the sloped areas. Pursuant to§275-3(C),areas that are subject to the Wetlands Law of the Town of Southold(Chapter 275 of Town Code)are lands within 100 feet of any freshwater wetland,tidal wetland,beach,bluff, dune,flat,marsh, swamp,wet meadow,bog,vernal pool, creek, estuary, stream,pond,canal,lake, land under water, or land subject to tidal action; as well as all Town Waters. The proposed action does not include any disturbance or activities within 100 feet of any of the wetlands, waterbodies or areas above. Although the proposed action would not occur within the regulated adjacent areas, the proposed action includes measures that would improve the existing site conditions. Currently, there are no stormwater management controls to contain stormwater on-site and to prevent runoff to the vegetated areas surrounding the facility. Upon implementation of the proposed action, stormwater would be captured and directed to stormwater infiltration units as well as collected,pretreated and discharged to the proposed detention basin. The placement of erosion control blankets at select areas would control erosion and sedimentation as well as slow runoff on areas that are currently devoid of vegetation. Furthermore,because the proposed concrete block gravity wall relies on the weight of the blocks for stability, the space required for a gravity wall is less than other systems. Overall, therefore,the proposed action would result in beneficial impacts to the natural areas and wetlands outside of the facility footprint. The project site is located within Flood Zone X, thus outside of the 500-year flood plain. Accordingly,no significant adverse flooding impacts are expected. Page 42 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 Critical Environmental Areas The subject property is located within two--Fisher's Island CEA and the Peconic Bay and Environs CEA. Both CEA's have their designations, as defined, "due to benefit to human health&protect drinking water." As indicated above, the proposed action would comply with SCDHS Article 4, Section 760-452(B)of the SCSC,which was established in order to minimize impacts of pollution on surface water quality and groundwater recharge. As an established facility for 30 years, the proposed action would establish stormwater controls with the construction of a stormwater detention basin and the installation of stormwater infiltration units, thus mitigating the impacts associated with stormwater runoff. Also,the proposed action includes methods to reuse stormwater such that the demands for additional water from the public water supply would be reduced. The proposed action situates improvements on the existing developed or disturbed areas,thus no natural vegetation would be removed. Overall, the proposed action is not expected to result in any significant adverse impacts to the critical environmental areas. Page 43 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 3.3 Land Use and Plans 3.3.1 Existing Conditions The Compost Station and related solid waste management activities have been operating on the subject property for 30 years. The operating areas of the facility are directly accessed via the entrance roadway on Whistler Avenue. As explained in Section 2.1 of this Expanded EA, the FIWM D took advantage of the batteries located in the central portion of the site to serve as elevated platforms for its receiving areas and the concrete foundations housing its roll-away dumpsters. A combined office and maintenance building is located at the eastern portion of the site,proximate to the access road. The northern portion of the subject property contains the remnants of a former battery as well as the Town sewer pump station; however, it is largely overgrown and entirely outside the functional area of the FIWMD facility. Photographs of the subject property, as described, are included in Appendix D of this Expanded EA. The transfer station consists of one household trash container,one corrugated cardboard container, four recyclable bins and accessory facility building(see Appendix D). The properties surrounding the subject property are of various uses (see Figure 13). To the north and east of the subject property are industrial buildings used by contractors on the Island. The Fishers Island Ferry District developed with the Island's ferry dock is also located to the north, which is used for all vehicle travel to/from the Island. To the east of the subject property, at its northern extent, are residential uses, including a parcel proposed for redevelopment for workforce housing. To the east thereof is the Fishers Island community center,various commercial uses and the Fishers Island School (on the east side of Fox Lane). To the south and east of the subject property is the Town-owned Elizabeth Field Airport. The Fishers Island Sound is located to the west of the subject property. Fishers Island Strategic Plan 2007-2017 The Fishers Island Strategic Plan 2007-2017 (FISP 2007) provides a planning framework for the Island setting forth community-based recommendations. As stated in the FISP 2007, "[i]n 2004, as a sequel to adopting its Comprehensive Implementation Strategy,the Town of Southold initiated a series of hamlet studies during which residents were asked to create micro-templates for land use and other public policy or administrative decisions within their respective hamlet centers.However, the template for these studies did not fit the particular circumstances of Fishers Island.Unlike other Southold hamlets which were struggling with problems related to population growth and new development, Fishers Island was fearful of further declines in its already small year-round population; to name just one of the issues of concern. Its geographic distance and isolation from the rest of the Town coupled with its closer physical proximity to Connecticut meant the business of government(as well as living)was somewhat awkward and complicated.Although the Islanders' had assumed an enormous degree of responsibility for protecting and enhancing their own public health, safety and welfare, some issues required a more cohesive leveraging of public as well as Page 44 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 private resources.A different template was needed."(pg. i) The FISP 2007"is intended to provide a visionary focus for decision-making at the community and governmental levels, as well as a practical listing of actions or strategies whereby the community's Vision could be realized." (pg. 2) As recognized in the FISP 2007, "[t]he composting station is operated on land owned by the FIWMD.The transfer station is operated on land leased from the Ferry District. The transfer station handles all household wastes including recyclables.The district does not dispose of junked cars or boats. The FIWMD would like to move the transfer operation onto its property in order to reduce operating and staffing costs and improve efficiency." (pg. 25) The FISP 2007 further recognizes that, "[p]ursuant to State regulations designed to protect sole source aquifers (sources of potable drinking water)from contamination,all household garbage generated on the Island must be shipped off the Island.The expense of shipping garbage via ferry is five hundred dollars($500)per 30 cubic yards of material. During the summer months, the District spends between eight- and twelve- thousand dollars($8,000-$ 12,000)per month to ship garbage to New London.In order to reduce this expense, the district is looking into ways of reducing the volume of garbage that must be shipped off the Island." (pg.25) The FISP 2007 included a vision plan and relevant to the FIWMD operations is to "[m]inimize environmental degradation from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes."It is to be noted that this policy is also included as a Town-wide goal and included in the Town of Southold's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program(LWRP). The LWRP is fully described in Section 3.3 of this Expanded EA. 3.3.2 Potential Impacts The proposed action would not change the current land use as a local solid waste management facility, but would expand the services to be provided by relocating its transfer station activities situated at 58 Town Road. As detailed in Section 2.5 of this Expanded EA, the proposed consolidation would also allow for the implementation of improved programs to, among other things,reduce solid waste disposal volumes. The relocation of the transfer station activities to the subject property would also eliminate the need for residents and businesses to visit two facilities for waste disposal. The proposed single-story, 4,500-sf pre-engineered mixing building would be located on the western portion of the facility in the area where materials management currently occurs. Such changes to the composting program, i.e., proposing to conduct its composting operations indoors, would eliminate the outdoor activities of managing the piles. The proposed installation of a cover system for the compost heaps would also provide for controlled aeration as well as leachate collection, and the effects of which would prevent odors that could be generated from exposed compost piles. r Page 45 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 The proposed maintenance building is to be located adjacent to the current office/maintenance building. Upon construction of the new building,the FIWMD would undertake interior renovations at the current office/maintenance building to provide for necessary administrative space. There are no staff increases projected upon implementation of the proposed action. Access to the subject property would remain in its current location. However,the internal roadway would be modified to a one-way,paved loop driveway. Twelve(12)parking spaces would also be created along the internal roadway in order to provide a formal and secure area for residents to unload wastes. A truck scale within the facility would allow the FIWMD to weigh in-bound and out-bound materials. The proposed site design considers the surrounding land uses by concentrating all improvements within portions of the site that are currently part of the existing compost station and receiving areas. The existing vegetation outside of the project site would not be disturbed. Also, as part of the proposed action,evergreen plantings would be placed along the project site that lies adjacent to the residential properties, one of which is being considered for workforce housing. As indicated in Section 2.6 of this Expanded EA,the FAA issued a Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation(see Appendix E). As such,the proposed action would not result in adverse impacts to the Elizabeth Field Airport. In accordance with the requirements set forth in the FAA's November 7, 2016 correspondence, the FIWMD will e-file Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration,within five days of completing the exterior building shell. Overall, based upon the above, the proposed action is not expected to result in any significant adverse land use impacts. It is expected that components of the proposed action, including indoor materials mixing and a cover system for the compost piles, would result in beneficial impacts associated with the current use of the facility for solid waste handling. Fishers Island Strategic Plan 2007-2017 The FISP 2007 recognized two main objectives of the proposed action; first, the desire of the FIWMD to consolidate its facilities on the compost station property in order to reduce operating and staffing costs and improve efficiency;and second,reducing the volume of garbage that is being shipped off the Island to reduce costs. No changes or alternatives to the use of the subject property for solid waste management were identified in the FISP 2007. The FISP 2007 included a vision and relative to the FIWMD operations is to "[m]inimize environmental degradation from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes." As indicated in Section 2.4 of this Expanded EA,the FIWMD does not handle hazardous wastes at its facilities and this practice would continue upon implementation of the proposed action. If FIWMD suspects that toxic or hazardous materials may have been inadvertently brought to the facility, such wastes are handled in accordance with standard procedures of placing such materials within indoor areas and arranging proper handling and disposal with the appropriate licensed carter. Also, the consolidated facility is designed to receive and store wastes in designated containers or enclosed Page 46 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 areas and all maintenance activities would occur inside the proposed maintenance building. Furthermore, compost piles would be placed on concrete pads and a cover system is proposed. It also to be noted that the proposed consolidation responds to the need to reduce wastes requiring traditional disposal by composting a portion of those wastes and improving its reuse area. Such consolidation and improved practices also reduces the number of trucks required for solid waste handling,thus reducing air emissions associated with transportation. As such,the proposed action is consistent with the intent of this goal. Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program(L)ARP) The Town of Southold LWRP document contains a complete inventory of the Town's resources, contains analyses of all existing land use conditions, and incorporates the goals of all existing planning studies and policies. In 2011, the Town of Southold Town Board adopted amendments to the LWRP,which were submitted to the New York State Secretary of State and the U.S. Office of Ocean and Coastal Management, respectively, in 2014. The LWRP was approved by the New York State Secretary of State on February 25,2014 and concurred by the U.S. Office of Ocean and Coastal Management on July 24,2014. The LWRP follows the Long Island Sound Regional Coastal Management Program Policies (LISCMP) in outlining 13 waterfront revitalization policies to specifically address the Town of Southold's resources. These 13 policies have been categorized into Developed Coast Policies, Natural Coast Policies,Public Coast Policies,and Working Coast Policies. The LISCMP describes a specific goal for each Coast,and these goals are identified within the Planning Framework section of the LWRP. In summary, as excerpted from the LWRP: • The Developed Coast-Enhance community character by improving the quality of existing development, promoting a sense of connection to the Sound, and focusing growth and investment to preserve the positive relationship between the built and natural landscapes and between existing and new development. • The Natural Coast- Reclaim the value and achieve sustainable use of the Sound's natural resources by improving the quality and function of ecological systems, respecting the dynamics of shoreline change, and providing high quality coastal waters. • The Public Coast- Connect people to the Sound and its public resources by improving visual and physical access and by providing a diversity of recreational opportunities. • The Working Coast-Reinvigorate the Sound's working waterfront, its jobs and products, at appropriate locations by protecting uses dependent on the Sound,furnishing necessary infrastructure, providing business and marketing assistance, and promoting efficient harbor operations. Page 47 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 The 13 policies implement the New York State Department of State(NYSDOS)44 coastal policies, and represent a local refinement of the Long Island Sound Regional Coastal Management Program Policies. Said policies and consistency therewith are included in Table 6. r' Page 48 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 Table 6-Consistency Analysis with the Town of Southold LWRP Coast Policy Description Analysis of Proposed Action Developed Coast Policy 1 Foster a pattern of The proposed action includes the consolidation of two waste management development in the facilities to a single parcel that is currently operated by the FIWMD as a Town of Southold that compost station and receiving facility. The subject property has been used enhances community for solid waste management for 30 years and is generally isolated from the character,preserves balance of the Island to the east,which is primarily residential in nature.The open space,makes proposed layout situates improvements within already developed portions of efficient use of the site,thus maintaining the surrounding vegetation and limiting ground infrastructure,makes disturbance.It is expected that components of the proposed action,including beneficial use of a indoor materials mixing and a cover system for the compost piles,would coastal location,and result in beneficial impacts associated with the current use of the facility for minimizes adverse solid waste handling. Also,a stormwater management system would be effects of development. installed to accommodate and reuse a portion of stormwater generated on- site. Accordingly,based upon the above,the proposed action would be consistent with the intent of this policy. Policy 2 Preserve historic Pursuant to the LWRP(Section 11—J Reach 10-30),there are no properties resources of the Town on Fishers Island listed on the State and National Registers of Historic of Southold. Places;however,there are structures within Fort H.G. Wright that are identified as being eligible for listing. The Fort H.G.Wright Fishers Island Historic District is also eligible for listing. According to the NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation(OPRHP)Cultural Resources Information System(CRIS),the subject property is also located within an archaeologically-sensitive area. To evaluate the potential for cultural impacts,consultations were undertaken with OPRHP. In correspondence dated June 29,2017(see Appendix H),OPRHP advised there are no archaeological concerns. As detailed in Section 3.7 of this Expanded EA, there are two Batteries within the current facility noted by OPRHP as being contributing resources to the eligible Fort H.G.Wright Fishers Island Historic District. However,in correspondence dated August 4,2017(see Appendix H),OPRHP indicated that"the proposed work will have No Adverse Impact upon historic resource[s]provided the following conditions are met: 1. Plans and specifications for the planned wall improvements to the Batteries will be submitted for our review and comment prior to the initiation of work on these Batteries; and 2. A construction protection plan will be put in place to protect the historic Batteries during the new construction. Our intention with the above conditions is to respect the historic footprint of these structures which has survived and contributes to the history of Fort H.G. Wright. The purpose of our review of plans and specifications for the planned wall improvements is to retain this historic footprint outline." In accordance with OPRHP's comments,the requested plans and specifications would be provided to OPRHP prior to the initiation of work on the subject property. As such,based upon the findings set forth by OPRHP,the proposed action would not result in significant adverse impacts to historic or cultural resources. Accordingly,based upon the above,the proposed action would be consistent with the intent of this policy. Page 49 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 Coast Policy Description Analysis of Proposed Action Policy 3 Enhance visual quality The proposed action includes the continued use of the subject property for and protect scenic municipal solid waste management and handling. All proposed resources throughout improvements would occur within areas that are currently developed and/or the Town of Southold. disturbed without any removal of surrounding vegetative buffers. The FIWMD is proposing to establish an area of evergreens along the northern area of the project site(adjacent to the operating area)for the purposes of a visual buffer.Accordingly,the proposed action would be consistent with the intent of this policy. Natural Coast Policy 4 Minimize loss of life, The existing facility and proposed improvement areas are located within structures,and natural areas outside of the 500-year floodplain(Flood Zone X),and therefore,no resources from significant adverse impacts associated with flooding would be expected to flooding and erosion. occur. Also,as evaluated in Section 3.6 of this Expanded EA,erosion and sedimentation controls would be undertaken prior to and during construction. Accordingly,the proposed action would comply with this policy. Policy 5 Protect and improve As indicated in the analysis of Policy 1,the proposed action includes the water quality and installation of a stormwater management system. A StormceptorO(or supply in the Town of similar)system would filter stormwater prior to discharge to the proposed Southold. stormwater detention basin. Such system also includes methods for the reuse of stormwater in operations,as needed.The proposed stormwater management plan would comply with the requirements set forth in the NYSDEC's NYS Stormwater Management Design Manual,NYSDEC's criteria and requirements for the SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit,and the Town of Southold's Stormwater Management regulations set forth in Chapter 236 of the Town Code. The proposed action also complies with the SCDHS Fishers Island Watershed Protection Standards. Further,the proposed action would not result in increases to the volumes of water supply or sanitary discharge. Accordingly,based upon the above,the proposed action would be consistent with the intent of this policy. Policy 6 Protect and restore the The proposed action is to occur within an operational area of an existing quality and function of solid waste management facility that has occupied the subject property for the Town of 30 years. The proposed action would not include the removal of any native Southold's ecosystem. or natural vegetation,and includes stormwater management controls to accommodate stormwater runoff generated from the project site. The proposed slope stabilization measures,including seeding areas with native, non-invasive plantings and installation of erosion control blankets,would protect areas outside the project site,including areas of natural vegetation, wetlands and surface waters. As such,the proposed action is consistent with the intent of this policy. Policy 7 Protect and improve air The improved composting operation replaces the current outdoor windrows quality in the Town of with a mixing building for indoor tipping,shredding and handling. Also Southold. proposed is a cover system,which would protect piles and control aeration to manage the biological process,thus minimizing the potential for dust and odors.Finally,the proposed action is anticipated to reduce the volume for disposal,thus reducing the number of waste disposal trucks. Such reduction would have a beneficial impact in reducing air quality impacts associated l' with vehicular emissions. As such,the proposed action is consistent with the intent of this policy. Page 50 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 Coast Policy Description Analysis of Proposed Action Policy 8 Minimize The proposed consolidated facility and its improvements would result in a environmental facility that(a)provides for solid waste management,(b)responds to the degradation in the need to reduce wastes requiring traditional disposal by composting a portion Town of Southold of those wastes,(c)improves the reuse practice,(d)reduces the number of from solid waste and trucks required for solid waste handling,thus reducing air emissions hazardous substances associated with transportation,(e)situates its consolidated facility within the and wastes. developed portion of the subject property,thus resulting in the protection of adjacent areas of native or natural vegetation,and surface waters,and(f) increases compost available to the Island's residents and businesses. Also, the proposed project includes the installation of stormwater management controls for stormwater runoff,including pretreatment measures. Finally, the FIWMD does not handle hazardous wastes at its facilities and this practice would continue upon implementation of the proposed action. With respect to the waste management practices,as detailed in Section 2.4 of this Expanded EA,the FIWMD maintains strict operating procedures in the receiving and storage of wastes. Based upon the above,the proposed action is consistent with the intent of this policy. Public Coast Policy 9 Provide for public The existing solid waste management facility has been operating on the access to,and subject property for 30 years. The FIWMD does not allow for public access recreational use of, through the facility,nor would such access be appropriate given the nature coastal waters,public of the land use. lands,and public resources of the Town of Southold. Working Coast Policy 10 Protect the Town of The subject property is an existing solid waste management facility owned Southold's water- and operated by the FIWMD,a special district of the Town of Southold. As dependent uses and such,this policy is not applicable to the proposed action. promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. Policy 11 Promote sustainable The subject property is an existing solid waste management facility owned use of living marine and operated by the FIWMD,a special district of the Town of Southold. As resources in the Town such,this policy is not applicable to the proposed action. of Southold. Policy 12 Protect agricultural The subject property is an existing solid waste management facility owned lands in the Town of and operated by the FIWMD,a special district of the Town of Southold. As Southold. such,this policy is not applicable to the proposed action. Policy 13 Promote appropriate The subject property is an existing solid waste management facility owned use and development and operated by the FIWMD,a special district of the Town of Southold. As of energy and mineral such,this policy is not applicable to the proposed action. resources. Based on the aforementioned analyses,the proposed action is consistent with the policies and goals of the LWRP, and thus,no significant adverse impacts to coastal resources would be expected. i Page 51 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 3.4 Noise and Odor 3.4.1 Existing Conditions Noise The existing noise generated at the subject property is primarily associated with the use of heavy equipment in moving materials and the shredding of logs and brush, and the removal of wastes by licensed carters. The FIWMD staff operate a wheeled loader at the facility,which is powered with a diesel motor. The loader has a muffler and is comparable to an over-the-road truck. Off-site noise impacts are limited,if any,as the current use has not resulted in any complaints. The FIWMD staff also operate a diesel-powered shredder outside to process logs and brush. Based upon FIWMD records,the shredder has not resulted in off-site noise impacts. A private trucking contractor removes full waste containers for transport to off-Island processing and disposal facilities. This activity generates noise as empty containers are deposited at the site and full containers loaded onto trucks. However, it is important to note that the FIWMD has not received any noise complaints in the past regarding truck activity. Odor The transfer station currently handles MSW, which contains putrescible material (such as food waste)that could generate odors over time. However,this waste is disposed in enclosed containers, which are removed from the site once determined to be full. Based upon FIWMD records, there have been no complaints related to odors at this facility. Regarding the composting operation, the FIWMD utilizes open windrows, which requires that FIWMD periodically turn the piles to maintain aerobic conditions. The potential source of odor arises under conditions where the digestive process becomes anaerobic due to poor management and operating practices. According to the FIWMD,trained staff perform the composting operation and there have been no odor-related complaints. 3.4.2 Potential Impacts Noise With respect to noise impacts after development,the subject property has been used for solid waste management for 30 years. Further,the subject property is adjacent to the Elizabeth Field Airport. Upon implementation of the proposed action,the facility would operate on weekdays from 7:30am to 4:30pm, and on weekends from 7:30am to 12:30pm. From time-to-time,the FIWMD may elect to close the facility one or more days in a week based upon seasonal and other usage patterns. Page 52 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 Upon implementation of the proposed action,the following noise sources would be expected: (1) on-site vehicle movements for disposal activities;(2)wheeled loader powered with a diesel motor; (3) diesel-powered shredder used to process logs and brush; and (4) loading and off-loading by hauling trucks. With respect to the on-site activities, and specifically vehicle-related noise,residents and business users would arrive at the site,park,and deposit waste and recyclables into on-site containers. These activities would not be expected to have off-site impacts. According to the FIWMD,the proposed project is expected to bring additional visitors to the facility(through consolidation of all activities at the site); however, neither the resident and small business traffic that use the facility, nor their site activities, are expected to result in measurable off-site adverse noise impacts. The FIWMD staff operate a wheeled loader at the facility,which is powered with a diesel motor. The loader has a muffler and is comparable to an over-the-road truck. Off-site noise impacts are limited, if any, as the current use has not resulted in any complaints. The proposed project is not expected to increase the number of hours of operation of this equipment and may actually result in a slight reduction in operating hours since the project would involve the implementation of a covered compost system to control the process. Currently,the open windrow composting approach requires periodic turning over of the pile to maintain aerobic conditions. It is further noted that the proposed mixing building and its internal operations are not expected to generate noise as the handling of all source-separated materials would be done inside the building, including shredding with a low speed electric powered grinder. The FIWMD staff also operate a diesel-powered shredder outside to process logs and brush, and this activity would continue with no changes as the proposed action would not increase the volume of logs and brush disposed of at the facility. A private trucking contractor removes full containers of waste and recyclables for transport to off- Island processing and disposal facilities. This activity generates noise as empty containers are deposited at the site and full containers loaded onto trucks. Overall, the proposed project is expected to result in a slight reduction in the number of off-Island truck trips (due to increased organics recycling) although all of the truck traffic would be concentrated at the compost station with the consolidation of activities previously conducted at the transfer station. According to FIWMD staff, each truck visit is of short duration. The established practice is that the inbound truck delivers an empty container and picks up a full container, and then returns on the same ferry to New London. Further, the trucks are required to be compliant with over-the-road noise limits and the FIWMD staff are on-site to address any potential issues. Additionally, the trucks would operate in the lower level of the facility site,where any noise impacts would be more contained to the site. It is noted that the FIWMD has not received any noise complaints in the past regarding truck activity. Based upon the above,the proposed action is not expected to result in any significant adverse noise impacts. Page 53 Expanded Environmental Assessment . Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 Odor As indicated above,there have not been any off-site odor complaints at either of the FIWMD's two currently operating facilities(the transfer station and the compost station) and the proposed action is not expected to generate odors. Upon implementation of the proposed action,the FIWMD would commence accepting source-separated organic waste from users of the facility, which would be placed in the proposed mixing building,ground up and added to the composting mass. This would result in an overall reduction of the amount of putrescible material in the outbound MSW containers. The proposed composting operation would occur inside the mixing building, which would automatically maintain aerobic conditions; thereby, further reducing any potential for odors to occur. Finally, the composting approach would include a full cover over the composting mass, with aeration of the pile automatically monitored and activated within. Overall, based upon the above, the proposed action is not expected to result in significant adverse impacts associated with odors. Page 54 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 3.5 Aesthetic Resources and Community Character 3.5.1 Existing Conditions The overall visual character of the subject property is that of a solid waste management facility. The subject property is currently comprised of an access roadway, attendant shed, elevated locations where users can park to deposit waste and recyclables into containers, shredding and composting equipment, an area of the site used to manage yard waste, brush and other organic materials, and a combined administrative and equipment maintenance facility. The remnants of a former lookout post are located within the project site. The remnants of a former battery are located in the northern portion of the subject property, within an area that is not used by the FIWMD and visible only from within the subject property. The office/maintenance building, constructed circa 2000, is situated along the eastern property line. A small paved parking area is located in the front of the building with a small,managed lawn area adjacent thereto. Views into the site from the adjacent roadway is generally restricted by dense vegetation, topography and the existing office/maintenance facility. As shown on the Topographic Map in Appendix B, when traveling from west to east, the elevations on Fox Lane, which then turns into Whistler Avenue, rise from approximately 8-to-14 feet amsl. At elevations 8f-to-10± feet amsl, there is an approximately 90-foot vegetative buffer between the roadway and project site, and a significant grade change to approximately 18 feet amsl. At the point of entry, the grade changes from 14f feet amsl at Whistler Avenue to approximately 28 feet amsl, leading to operational areas to the west. Due to the grade changes, the operational areas are largely obstructed from the roadway. With respect to adjacent properties, there is a significant amount of dense vegetation along the northern and eastern portions of the subject property,which limit the views in to the site. Photographs are provided in Appendix D of this Expanded EA. 3.5.2 Potential Impacts The proposed action would not alter the topography or vegetative buffers that exist between Fox Lane and the project site. As indicated in the Grading&Drainage Design (see Appendix B),the proposed maintenance building is situated in an area where elevations currently range from 18f- to-21±feet amsl and the area would be regraded for a first floor elevation of 18.3 feet amsl. It is noted that the adjoining office/maintenance building is situated at Elevation 16.9. With the height of the proposed maintenance building at 15 feet (see Appendix B) and the current vegetative screening and grade changes from Fox Lane to remain unchanged, significant visual changes are not expected. As an existing facility, the proposed design situates the mixing building and composting pads at the westerly portion of the facility,where there is adequate land area and is furthest from residential properties. As indicated on the proposed Grading&Drainage Design plan(see Appendix B),the average finished floor elevation would be 27 feet, thus the top of the building would range from Page 55 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 52-to-58 feet amsl. It is expected that portions of the mixing building would be visible from the site entrance;however,the visual changes are not expected to be significant. As indicated in Section 3.3.2 of this Expanded EA,the mixing building elevations do not pose an obstruction hazard to the Elizabeth Field airport. The FIWMD is also proposing to maintain the existing perimeter vegetation as well as to establish an area of evergreens along the northern area of the project site(adjacent to the operating area)for the purposes of providing a visual buffer from residential properties to the northeast of the facility. At the point of entry, the existing grade changes from 14f feet amsl at Whistler Avenue to approximately 26 feet amsl, leading to operational areas to the west, would largely remain unchanged. As part of the proposed paving of the internal roadway,the slope would be reduced; however,the top elevation of 26f feet would be only slightly altered to 26.5±feet. The proposed detention basin at the entry would be designed to a top elevation of 14t feet amsl at its northern point(adjacent to Whistler Avenue),and its southern extent would rise to 16f feet amsl. The proposed action includes the installation of fixed lighting on the proposed maintenance and mixing buildings, and pole lighting on select perimeter areas. To mitigate light trespass and glare, all lighting would be shielded and directed downwards, at an intensity compliant with Chapter 172 of the Town Code (Outdoor Lighting). The proposed lighting would comply with the lighting standards set forth in §172-5, and is subject to the review and approval of the Town Building Department. As such,the proposed action is not expected to result in significant adverse lighting impacts. Overall, based on the above, no significant adverse impacts to the character of the community or visual resources are expected. Page 56 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 >> 3.6 Construction-Related Impacts The proposed improvements and consolidation of the facilities are estimated to be completed in five months.As provided by the project engineer,the FIWMD proposes to commence construction in the spring months and only after the site improvements are completed would the activities now conducted at the transfer station be relocated to the subject property. Land Disturbance During construction activities, there is the potential for erosion and sedimentation with prolonged soil exposure and fugitive dust during dry periods. As indicated in Section 3.2.2 of this Expanded EA, erosion and sedimentation controls would be undertaken prior to and during construction and would include,at minimum,stockpile protection,inlet sediment control devices for storm structure protection, silt fencing, and anti-tracking pads to prevent off-site sediment tracking from construction vehicles. Seeding with a native,non-invasive grass mix and erosion control blankets are also proposed on select unvegetated areas to the west of the facility, which are susceptible to erosion. Such measures would provide long-term stabilization of this area, as well as mitigate the effects of runoff on an area that is currently devoid of vegetation. In accordance with the NYS Erosion and Sedimentation Control Manual, the blanketed areas would be inspected weekly and after each runoff event until vegetation is established to a minimum uniform 80 percent coverage throughout the blanketed area. Fugitive dust consists of soil particles that become airborne when disturbed by heavy equipment operation or through wind erosion of exposed soil after groundcover (e.g., lawn, pavement) is removed. To minimize fugitive dust emissions, a water truck will be utilized (as needed) during construction activities where land surfaces would be disturbed. All erosion and sediment control measures will be routinely inspected and maintained such that no sediment would be transported off-site. If any sediment escapes from the subject site, it will be swept back onto the site by manual or mechanical means (depending upon the amount of fugitive sediment) under the direction of the construction manager. The aforementioned erosion and sedimentation controls would minimize the potential impacts associated with construction activities. The proposed action would disturb approximately 2.40 acres of land for site preparation, grading and construction activities. As required under the SPDES General Permit and Multi-Sector General Permit Programs,as well as the Town of Southold,a SWPPP would be prepared and would include erosion and sediment control practices set forth in the New York Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control (NYSDEC, 2016), as well as the water quality and quantity requirements set forth in the New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual(NYSDEC, 2015). The Notice of Intent(NOI)requesting coverage under the General Permits would be filed ( with the NYSDEC and prior to the initiation of construction activities at the property. Page 57 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 Overall, with the implementation of the aforementioned mitigation measures, no significant adverse impacts associated with land disturbance would be expected. Air Quality With respect to construction-related air quality impacts, as indicated above, a water truck will be on-site during dry periods to dampen exposed soils to suppress dust. Also, the construction manager will oversee construction vehicles and equipment to ensure that they include and properly maintain their emission control equipment, and when appropriate, prohibit vehicular idling. Overall, air quality in the area of the subject property would not be expected to be substantially affected by construction activities because of fugitive dust control,emission control procedures and the temporary nature of construction activities. Emissions from the operation of construction machinery are also short term and not generally considered substantial. Overall, with the implementation of the aforementioned mitigation measures, no significant adverse construction- related air quality impacts would be expected. Noise With respect to potential noise impacts,the hours of construction are planned for 7:30 am to 5:30 pm during non-holiday weekdays. On a limited basis,construction activities would be undertaken on Saturday. No construction would take place on Sundays. The proposed development is expected to generate typical sound levels from construction activities, including foundation construction,truck movements,and heavy equipment operations. Heavy machinery, such as front- end loaders, graders, bulldozers, and backhoes, would be used intermittently throughout the proposed project's construction. To mitigate construction-related noise impacts, the construction manager would control the on-site idling of construction vehicles. Also, the construction equipment utilized on-site would be required to have installed and properly operating noise muffler systems. The construction manager will also work with the FIWMD staff, which will also be on- site to respond to any noise complaints during construction. Overall, the noise impacts during construction would temporary and with the aforementioned mitigation measures and on-site management of activities, no significant adverse construction- related noise impacts would be expected. Subsurface Investigations and Conditions The FIWMD site,as part of the overall Fort H.G.Wright,is currently in the Defense Environmental Restoration Program — Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) program. The FUDS program includes four categories, in which,based on available information,the FIWMD was determined to be investigated under two of the four categories: (1) CON/HTRW (Containerized Storage/Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste), and(2)MMRP(Military Munitions Response Program). Both of these investigations are being led and implemented by the US Army Corps of Page 58 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 Engineers(USACOE). Fort H.G.Wright is also listed as a New York State(NYS)Inactive Waste Site(#152241). With respect to the CON/HTRW investigation,the USACOE has advised the FIWMD of a planned removal of six abandoned underground storage tanks (USTs) and one transformer on the subject property. Based upon information provided by USACOE and included in Appendix G of this Expanded EA,the six USTs and one transformer are located outside of the project area. Pursuant to the USACOE in October 2016, this work was tentatively planned for FY2017; however, the FIWMD has not been advised of a specific date. With respect to the MMRP investigation,the USACOE completed an Archives Search Report dated February 14, 2007 and then followed by a Site Inspection. In September 2007, the USACOE published the Final Site Inspection Report (2007 Final SI Report), which recommended the performance of a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RDFS) on select areas of Fort H.G. Wright under the Comprehensive, Environmental Response, and Liability Act (CERCLA). In summary,with respect to the subject property,the 2007 Final SI Report concluded: • The FIWMD project area is part of the area designated as Munitions Response Site I (MRS 1). • Limited sampling was performed at the four batteries' located within the area to be re- developed by the FIWMD. • Sampling results exceeded NYSDEC Part 370 Unrestricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives (SCO)for several metals. • Limited geophysical reconnaissance was conducted along the western side of the former battery locations, with no subsurface anomalies noted in the vicinity of the Butterfield, Barlow, Hamilton, or Hoffinan batteries. • The report concluded a"low to moderate" risk for Munitions and Explosives of Concern (MEC)within MRS 1. • Recommended the performance of a RI/FS of the site to focus on MEC under CERCLA although no analytes associated with past munitions uses were reported at levels exceeding the USEPA Preliminary Remediation Goals(PRG)screening values or NYSDEC Part 375 Commercial Use SCOs. Several metals exceeded the NYSDEC unrestricted use SCOs. Based on the nearly 10 years since completion of the 2007 Final SI Report and no indication of any future work to be performed by the USACOE (i.e., the RDFS), as well as the Fort H.G. Wright's listing as a New York State (NYS) Inactive Waste Site (#152241), the FIWN l D retained PW Grosser Consulting, Inc. (PWGC) to conduct the additional investigations recommended by the USACOE. Specifically,PWGC performed an environmental investigation of MEC to evaluate the 'Former Battery designations within the FIWMD include:AMTB 913,Butterfield,Barlow,Hamilton,and Hoffman. Proposed development work is limited to the areas around Batteries AMTB 913, Butterfield and Barlow. Battery AMTB 913 is located south of Battery Butterfield and was reportedly buried during the Fort's closure activities and therefore was not investigated as part of the SI. The 2007 Final SI Report identified these three Batteries as using large caliber munitions(37 mm and larger). The location of the Batteries is provided in Figure 2 of the PWGC Report. Page 59 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District Septeniher 2017 likelihood of the presence of unexploded ordnance (UXO) in areas to be disturbed during site redevelopment as well as the potential for past site uses to have impacted soil quality. PWGC's work included a geophysical investigation of select areas of the project site as well as soil characterization(sampling). A summary of the PWGC "Pre Construction Environmental Investigation Report" (hereinafter, the "PWGC Report") findings and recommendations are included below, and the PWGC Report is included in its entirety in Appendix G of this Expanded EA. Geophysical Survey A geophysical survey was performed on December 13 and 14, 2016 to identify the potential presence of metallic anomalies that may be indicative of UXO. The investigation focused on detecting anomalies that were generally larger in size- 37 mm projectile and larger—based upon the data included in the 2007 Final SI Report. Three grids were set up in the areas of the proposed stormwater basin(Grid 1),truck scale and paved driveway(Grid 2),and the proposed maintenance building(Grid 3). A total of 376 targets and 5 saturated response areas were identified in the three areas (grids) that were investigated. Grid 1, located on the southern portion of the property contained the most anomalies and one saturated response area(associated with a building), Grid 2 included four saturated response areas,and Grid 3 contained the fewest anomalies and several areas j where the survey was not performed(wooded area). The locations of the individual anomalies and the four saturated response areas are identified on Figure 4 of the PWGC Report in Appendix G of this Expanded EA. Based upon the work performed, PWGC has concluded that the anomalies detected during the geophysical investigation are not likely to be associated with UXO and such conclusion is based upon the following: 1. The limited geophysical survey performed by the USACOE in the 2007 Final SI Report did not identify any subsurface anomalies in the vicinity of the former batteries associated within the site. 2. There is no reported history of UXO being found at the site. 3. There would have to have been an intentional or unintentional placement or loss of UXO in the vicinity of the batteries by military personnel,which seems unlikely, at least for any ,significant amount of UXO. 4. The past military use and the current use as a waste management transfer station could be the source of scattered metallic debris(unrelated to UXO) at the site and the cause for the anomalies detected during the geophysical survey. Notwithstanding the above findings, PWGC has recommended and the FIWMD will undertake additional activities prior to and during construction. Such action plan,as described in the PWGC Report, would minimize and/or limit the likelihood of encountering UXO during the site redevelopment and the risks associated with such UXO. The action plan would include conducting Page 60 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 test pits at the identified anomalies and/or saturated areas before beginning site redevelopment with a qualified UXO technician. Also,a qualified UXO technician will be on-site during the initial site redevelopment activities to provide excavation oversight and in the event any suspect material is found, would coordinate removal with the USACOE. The FIWMD will also coordinate with the regulatory stakeholders(NYSDEC and USACOE)prior to and during construction, as necessary. Based on the findings and recommendations of PWGC, as well as the actions that will be undertaken by the FIWMD prior to and during construction, the potential for UXO and the risks associated with same,would be managed. Soil Characterization Soil samples were collected from areas which would be disturbed during the site redevelopment (see Figure 3 in the PWGC Report)to determine if soils have been impacted by past site operations. Based on the proposed grading and drainage design plans, a total of eight samples were collected: two samples each were collected at the proposed maintenance building and stormwater detention basin; one sample each at the proposed swap shop and e-waste buildings; and two samples were collected in areas proposed for additional site grading. Samples were collected at various depths based upon the extent of excavation to be performed within each area. The table below, as excerpted from the PWGC Report, summarizes the sample locations and sample depths. Table 7-Soil Sampling Summary Sample Location Sample ID Sample Depth(feet) Analytical Parameters Sample Coordinates Water Storage Basin S-1 0 0-0 5 Explosive Residues(EPA 8330),Metals 1525122 257 402338 2962 Water Storage Basin 5-2 4 0-6 0 Explosive Residues(EPA 8330),Metals 1525109 67 402310 5184 Proposed Graded Area S-3 0 0-0 5 Explosive Residues(EPA 8330),Metals 1525083194 4022384698 Swap Shop Building 5-4 0 0-0 5 Explosive Residues(EPA 8330),Metals 1524929 548 402170 7614 Mixing Building 5-5 2 0-4 0 Explosive Residues(EPA 8330),Metals 1524731 198 402272 758 Proposed Graded Area S-6 0 0-0 5 Explosive Residues(EPA 8330),Metals 1524673 038 402329 1816 Maintenance Building S-7 0 0-0 5 Explosive Residues(EPA 8330),Metals 1524940 833 402384 7371 Maintenance Budding 5-8 2 0-4 0 Explosive Residues(EPA 8330),Metals 1524970 347 402370 4142 Samples were collected with a stainless steel hand auger at depths ranging from 0-6 feet below ground surface. Metals samples were collected as grab samples. Samples for explosive residues were 5-point composite samples. The composite samples were obtained from a 10-foot-by-l0-foot area around each sampling location (from the appropriate depth interval). An equal aliquot from each composite sample location was placed in a stainless steel bowl, mixed and then transferred into laboratory-supplied glassware. Page 61 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 Samples were analyzed for metals and munitions constituents, as follows: • Metals—TAL Metals by USEPA Method 6010 • Mercury—USEPA Method 7471B • Zirconium—USEPA Method 6020A ■ Explosive Residues—USEPA Method 8330 Soil sample data was compared to the NYSDEC Unrestricted Use SCOs and NYSDEC Commercial Use SCOs specified in NYSDEC 6 NYCRR Part 375 Environmental Remediation Programs, as well as USEPA PRGs. Analytical data are summarized in Tables 2 and 3 of the PWGC Report, and the laboratory analytical report is included in Appendix H of the PWGC Report. As indicated in the PWGC Report,the soils collected throughout the site consisted of light brown- to-brown coarse sands with gravel and some cobbles. UXO or metallic debris was not encountered in the material observed during the soil sampling. A summary of the soil sampling data follows: 1. Compounds indicative of explosives were not detected at concentrations exceeding their respective method detection limits (MDL) in any of the soils samples collected from the site and analyzed for explosives residue by USEPA Method 8330B. 2. Metals were detected at concentrations below NYSDEC Unrestricted Use SCOs and USEPA PRGs in all eight samples,with the exception of arsenic, lead,and mercury. • Arsenic was detected at concentrations slightly exceeding USEPA PRGs in samples S-1, S-2, and S-3, all of which were shallow sampling intervals (0— 0.5 feet). However, these concentrations of arsenic were well below NYSDEC Commercial and Unrestricted Use SCOs. • Lead was detected at concentrations exceeding NYSDEC Unrestricted Use SCOs in samples S-3 and S-7, both of which were shallow sampling intervals (0 — 0.5 feet). The concentrations of lead were well below USEPA PRGs and NYSDEC Commercial SCOs. • Mercury was detected at a concentration slightly exceeding the NYSDEC Unrestricted Use SCOs in sample S-3,which was a shallow sampling interval(0— 0.5 feet). The concentration of mercury was well below USEPA PRGs and NYSDEC Commercial Use SCOs. l � Page 62 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 3. No non-metal compounds indicative of munitions use were detected above MDLs in the samples collected. Several metals(arsenic,lead,and mercury)that may be associated with past munitions use were identified,although the levels detected are below the SCOs for the site's intended use and are within the range of typical background levels. Only lead (two samples) and mercury (one sample) exceeded NYSDEC Unrestricted Use SCOs. No sampling results exceeded NYSDEC Commercial Use SCOs. Based upon the results,PWGC does not consider chemical contaminants in the soil to be a concern and,therefore,indicates that there are no restrictions for reuse of soils on-site. PWGC also indicates that there are no concerns of exposure to elevated levels of chemical contaminants in on-site soils by construction personnel or users on the site. As such,PWGC recommends no further action for additional work related to site soils. With respect to the presence of UXO, PWGC's findings indicate that UXO is likely not present; however,prior to construction,test pits at the identified anomalies and/or saturated areas would be performed with a qualified UXO technician. During excavation, a qualified UXO technician will be available to provide oversight. Also, prior to construction (and as necessary, during construction), FIWMD will coordinate with the NYSDEC and USACOE. As such, given the activities performed by PWGC and the actions that will be undertaken by the FIWMD prior to and during construction,the potential for UXO and the risks associated with same,would be managed. As noted in Section 3.6,the USACOE is planning the removal of six USTs and one transformer in areas that are located outside of the project site. As such, the proposed improvements would not interfere with the USACOE's future work nor does this work impact the site redevelopment activities. Page 63 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 3.7 Cultural Resources 3.7.1 Existing Conditions Pursuant to the LWRP(Section II—J Reach 10-30),there are no properties on Fishers Island listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places; however, there are structures within Fort H.G. Wright that are identified as being eligible for listing. There is also the Fort H.G. Wright Fishers Island Historic District,which is eligible for listing on the State and National Registers of Historic Places. According to the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) Cultural Resources Information System (CRIS), the subject property is also located within an archaeologically-sensitive area. 3.7.2 Potential Impacts Consultations were undertaken with OPRHP to identify whether the proposed action would have potential impacts on cultural resources. In correspondence dated June 29,2017(see Appendix H), OPRHP advised that there are no archaeological concerns. Batteries Butterfield and Barlow(which are within the current facility)were noted by OPRHP as contributing resources to the eligible Fort H.G. Wright Fishers Island Historic District and requested additional information with respect to the potential impacts on the historic batteries and in particular, the proposed mixing building and compactors. A response to OPRHP's requests was submitted via CRIS on July 7, 2017 and in correspondence dated August 4,2017(see Appendix H), OPRHP advise of the following: "We have reviewed the additional information provided in the July 7, 2017 letter from KGO Consulting, Inc. Based upon this review, we understand that the proposed new construction will not directly impact the historic Butterfield and Barlow Batteries. Further that these Batteries will continue to be used for the current usage.As a result of this review, it is OPRHP's opinion the proposed work will have No Adverse Impact upon historic resource[s] provided the following conditions are met: 1. Plans and specifications for the planned wall improvements to the Batteries will be submitted for our review and comment prior to the initiation of work on these Batteries. 2. A construction protection plan will be put in place to protect the historic Batteries during the new construction. We recognize that these Batteries have been used for waste management purposes for over 30 years and the Battery structures have been impacted by this use. Our intention with the above conditions is to respect the historic footprint of these structures which has survived and contributes to the history of Fort H.G. Wright. The purpose of our review of plans and specifications for the planned wall improvements is to retain this historic footprint outline." l � Page 64 Expanded Environmental Assessment Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island Waste Management District September 2017 In accordance with OPRHP's request, all plans and specifications would be provided to OPRHP for review and comment prior to the initiation of work on the subject property. As such, based upon the findings set forth by OPRHP, the proposed action would not result in any significant adverse impacts to historic or cultural resources. Page 65 FIGURES f� p�f f�y kta 9 n c, •� ton"Raw Transfer Station Compost Station 0 275 550 FT Goocle Compost Station Figure 1 Transfer Station Site Location Map FIWMD Town-Owned/Proposed Lease Area(Approximate Boundaries) 2760 Whistler Drive Fishers Island, Town of Southold, NY Source(s)(1)Servke Um Cnd 00m.StrMMep(enE)co.tr tors CC-BY-SAEe HERE De Lorme Mepmylntl®OOpnSbeetMep mrmiEulora enE1M GIS user communiy �� ••;�' KGO Compost Station \ Transler Station �• OF samq a F� 8 �'p O' 6� F.D.27 ISLAND BLOCK JA N Figure 2 Suffolk County Tax Map FIWMD 2760 Whistler Drive Fishers Island,Town of Southold,NY Source:County of Suffolk Real Property Tax Service Agency,Tax Map Section No 012 KGO NEW LONDON QUADRANGLE NEW YORK (Unavailable) TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES (Unavailable) 072°02.20.4041"w Unavailable 072°01'20.3066"W 041'16'02.1177"N 041°16'02 1177"N 0 0000"W 072'02'00.0000"W 072'01 40.0000"W 072'01' 0 0 0 0 CD 9 1D - 0 st 'Beach , :•� ':? �' --� 6 a HalZ- f / / r '► ,, ' '� �` � urs { �w ioir io s N s Rver E � r�k�,I • �� 4. � (Unavailable) V S COAST G D' r b5 �' MY( srlc) STA o eject ! V r' •�� ♦• • � o �.- _ C) �"'Property r �r • • �,%�� ; i7 00 i Y •i two .(/ T AL !Elizabe Feld Z- � r�f/ z CD tlfiIbl��28 z` ,,. o o ��f o 0 0 POP Co n ht C 2009 M To 11 0.0000"W 072'02'00 0000"W 072'01'40.0000"W 072'01': 041°14'564041"N 1 . 041°14'564041"N onmea rn��oizon 072°02'204041"W Declination (Unavailable) 072°01'203066"W (PLUM ISLAND) * SCALE 1:10000 (Unavailable) MN( N 00 01 02 03 04 Miles NEW LONDON,NY 0 1000 2000 1984 Feet GN 1.95'E CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET Figure 3 MN 14.00°W NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM 1929 g FISHERS ISLAND WELL MONITORING NETWORK I Z. Subject Property—, yk. __•SPA t �7 S ' ,.r F.,�., ,, r 1 5..L...q�G.q\� � er i� i.y��` v� GROUND WATER, INC. -oma FISHERS ISLAND SUFFOLK COUNTY.NEW YORK "'•' •� GROUND WATER TABLE „,-••••�-••• CONTOURS wo.e . w �•'w rew.wonoeo -•�•.,•. PLATE 3 e.rwr riewrwa.e.r.vo co+srwrwwcr 9CI1LE: --fao0' BEVTE MBER�YSO Figure 4-Groundwater Contour Map FIWMD 2760 Whistlers Avenue,Fishers Island,Town of Southold,NY Source Groundwater Inc,Hydrogeologic Report(1990) FGl) MW Pono a Money Pond r w.�+e 1s Wade fam%Pond l 1 R 8~pow ° - Treasure Pond Suffolk County Department of Health Services Baa,.:Pare Division of Environmental Qualitv j' Map of Fishers Island Watershed Protection Zones wckv rd Pow ' F f Primary Protection Zone Subject . 0 Secondary Protection Zone Property Note:The specific boundaries of Protection Zones are describixi on the Otticialh,Adopted Maps. A ccipv of the maps are available * from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Figure 5 SCDHS Fishers Island Watershed Protection Zones Map FIWMD 2760 Whistler Drive Fishers Island, Town of Southold, NY �,,uni r+;ti.m+a r Mn n.w„m.�r.,w,nn w.�.nm,err..��a,.Mrw,r rw..,,er.�n vr►.wn nm.roo.rw.r pb ar.) •M� ••;•' KGO < 7y` A�<�c , y' �q.,%�� '�L<,r�i . `` � .•.. ky c • y y` ➢ 1 �� iP',•ds .b- :`��`:r r+ }aKs.z i yr Rfc ` :: • AWE— ra y a fi.'.- ',f'wFarT;-'4�,«•-<f'�, lac.`«ri�`j>*yY<�F.r�Fcy51 3� .'�z.ep#6,7<►w_�as^�.$i.Lr*•,c l,•�S�.7+?Lf�t7'�,hs'TtY`k a ..a.r {qi,, 2re`�„•s�> R.J. 4 kdr 0 �,'yr.FF�)~+']sr--�.`H;>�i3y°i l_}•,{F ,�,•.t ci �" SY3 q s sr ' t > ^� r x-•Mf�. •'�; ` +i.?1rx > .,;•t"�' 'Ill ,;:WIS >1rf %�!y.$y�^�axc•�xy .+4 s]7'{�y.�< �y�{ ]� .ij • �] +Cr04�+? � :2+�>'tr7R �F't'<�''�--lf`XyY '4 4"a1F-<=R y`�,Il� FOPL R (FSYS`<F •yM 'li' ` a <ro s+ •!"''Y ?q • ! ff�+✓✓ �i. rM f i sir. } }c b., k : 'b � < f' •�'h] Ys ?r �> a , �` °-^ ,� <yxY3x,apt r,i5t •p`•�ySJ, Y„r�2as > y•,o. a rw �y� ! sli yy r-'}.<k`,4c rr•`.. '`3''3�-''' 'y' ,F - \ +. �< aSfs,.r yis -YC 'y'q�,;( 'K �••> y R �,>^ F a� �T%-' r 5. ,•et°`r. r »i'V,' .....`` A 'PJ,.3 z 1SAPPHOb .ti <" ••:[., VIA—d {i' 3f]�.'- a},c , �<S. ? Y' �� 4��h � - t vs fifi z 'jri°� x Y�X ,�+ '1s � tw F:� a,,, r -.?�> • > t' 'Y :<,d7in. -sq < .c,�r"�r' •dc„M 3a r'" ` ` .• ` s "'.. 1 \•. •Rese <F3?Rbr< ' .:� ! - 3' "bay s tw vt ; a '4^• <! (��• n,...Y} >..,1,� < �'"; •'� 3"` ^A t�' p`a' Cc! �'+ ^+ '�3.,. < �as�, r: ' 1 • M: 's< (L, }?>>Z�Ot� >aiM Sa�.s .e t \n�°:g+i " �+ �}`£tom s•[ >}# 4z x�LI� 7:•. • •• t �` t��r�Y•p.,lf'�'^��,�y�ly��.�M�"T'�� `x� 4-t lam'•42 .� �Y_` �t< � i�•Y F. •• • • i �:�ya'�- sf y3A.+ f��t<.r ^>�C�k.,f z �c q�.�,,o s. 3c i<16- <,Pk' {t> • • ..- k a,b<•,t '...5 v,U-Y'¢Y "Ft•A;-r< '.c �✓- u"��i{<s� At€u�! _•^w ,t,< .rr� ^" i'SjFu•S• y. �t , ••• • + • 3> 4 *�•"^r+t � �. ' ��d-��'r<'j> �a� �, >f�stey rq++pnc" ]`a.<+�iT yi -s ,41i aR ,po.� �.r,,.••,`-.V 6}'F, ;�FA-s..i .'�<4fgr `FyL;,�Ci� wiz 'N;"L'• 2 Z i rk �,`�,+ +•,, � �?��.� Y,a��• `-r' »°rti+ FE .Yr a �I • y7! xl�,'�` ��.i�.'}'? < r' '`!• • fS7�S .S >•y ^ w> '.'. .• < t,�ny�a {yS?w3�.k r t4 .ty. y'f, 3D•,we�4• 'yam. r--- �'•�' �+:+�;i'2a'� K.. >:. >+af�`yf, a `� \, rc 4e*('`•4 «••' Se .�t <yf, . rl • • ;..],..,y�,� -.r z "",c�,.ti�< "►i}'A,ii; ♦-� ••'>•;»ii+' {` "3r ''A_,�, 7.,4 w • <fi:•�•,��xF tr J'c�4 y!.'a,,,t� y t '`_y '" Sr>> <y, yZ i . +�s ll� y`•,i'�'£F� is{>f `yt Y.y, > , �. z I� • 1—g. < '�'#"�C�. r,` � o K�sypfv:ve <j'k �c.�i ��t, 2�' �� •• s t i a� i.rY r 1 r Y •.y •• �.:'£..'.'. rCtr• •d kp�r` `9 ,�<�(1. <Y• _�' y3v'�a' • •� • F, >.s s2q�y4. x 'Y a ;� +9>� ,yhip•At: ;-:4.-: �'. "Pyi�t"''�k 'f"� , • 9."%; o • • t �"a i"A`.%� •y'' > am •IS } .�1,.,} ,r r` {��a • I ~ /' • �]KYZ'r� jpr '" <.• a y ;<` ° fr-f '"' �� t i"S • l • '`�EaC. - / rm T Y t ` #Sk 4,X•;r� ;F :� 1� •1 ` J • Al ft eea'ssyy!��+� w. '•.;r?e'�6`�S`�' `'^9„'� ri�,"w}�ti*<x kp'0�'o`h'� �� I'' • r r�•li• � .xas as a // '/. • • '` e • �E.lf�• 1`` �� *65 h5�v >. r;a • � • .]/`rx}i> ti b. a r 'r �z`t . ''qZ` � A'•Y:SC'tcX tr ;'y c,>. 'Jl'` •, 0.4 ."i h7iyc is y Ma? �+'<F>tir ,'c�'.7'. r ; x� .'�}�•jr�k¢,sR�� '�.K:%S. �>; s ,qt{ r s I :a,'7��y;,}rys�.t'3T�F Ffifyii'*43"°e `� xx ^'�g J•///y^�• ` .,g ,t'.t'-.•3i 'd7'j< ¢r< +•#•q�?�(3`, F.�`Lw;,,;P't►<�` 'r � � :� .TY A• j }< `!• Y`pyfiy t' lb `taY {.< aX•. •../ i2abeth Field ~ •.< <. ,��r ' �2'n .`f<'y r.>y--��;}^.i. Rae � i},r- F/'/ / � �-.-.- ---...`___` -•1 'BM/x•28 2'30" 2 540 000 Subject Property Boundary Figure 6 NYSDEC Freshwater Wetlands Map—No. 1 of 39 z� Town-Owned/Proposed Lease Area (Approximate Boundaries) FIWMD 2760 Whistler Drive Fishers Island, Town of Southold, NY Sours(.)(1)New YorF SNN 0.peMsnl of EmnonmeMel Lomerveeron SuIIOIF Counh Fresnwebr WetleMe MeD No 1 0l]S ••�' KGO I f I T N Figure 7 NYSDEC Tidal Wetlands Map 748-570 FIWMD 2760 Whistlers Avenue Fishers Island,Town of Southold,NY Source:New York State Department of Environmental Conservation KG O �1 31 ft �I 0 100 200 FT -� bject Property Boundary Significant Natural Community Figure 8 Su +Town-Owned/Proposed Lease Area(Approximate Boundaries) Natural Communities Near This Location NYSDEC Environmental Resource Mapper laterbody Classification for Lakes Rare Plants or Animals tate Regulated Freshwater Wetlands F I WM D tate Regulated Wetland Checkzone 2760 Whistler Driv Fishers Island, Town of Southold, NY Seurcelsl(1)Naw Yo State Enveon oil Resource Mapper 1hepny90 prs rm,)Acw—Jun.is 2017 ••�' KGO E1ABL-Estuarine and Marine Deepwater E1 UBL-Estuarine and w p Marine Deepwater j 01 - , i r - t E1ABL-Estuarine and ., Marine Deepwater to E2EM1 N - Estuarine and Marine Wetland >♦ 0 4 to i r .0 r r 0 100 200 FT Subject Property Boundary Figure 9 Town-Owned/Proposed Lease Area (Approximate Boundaries) NWI Wetlands MapFIWMD ■ NWI Wetland Boundary 2760 Whistler Drive Fishers Island, Town of Southold, NY S._(e)(1)Service Leger C.d. S..E.,D.I.GWNe G.Eye E,ft-,Ge pN CNES/A1NWe DS USDA USGS M.GRID IGN—M GIS U.,C....dy (2)U S FISN 6 WWINe S.1— NI-1 NEtle Inventory Wella Mapper(MM./Mvw Aye povrwe Wh 11✓napper M )AxesxO Jura 18 2017 ••;•' KGO LEGEND SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 1%ANNUAL CHANCE ROOD The 116 amsel Mood(100-yeer food),also known as the oou flood,is the flood that h.IS 1% marc.d beep equaled or wmeded,n ary glum year The Spedil Rood reTad AIM Is the sea ae)eet to foming by the 1%wrtha chance toad. Mead or Spadai Rood Hated Include luta A AE,AH,Aa,AR A99,V,and VE The Case Rood EJeveEcn is the rebs-arfae e#aton dtae 1%ffra ichance flood ZONE A No Bax Rood ElNalore derttn i n i ZONEAE We Rood BNabons deal ZONEAH Food depths of 1 to 3 res(LsWIV Meas of paroling),Base Food Swatoredetarri ZONE AO Road depths of 1 to 3 feet(usually sheet Bon on sl pre terran);average depths determined. For ares of aluua fan flooding,retocees also ZONE AR $aW Rood Hatad Arm f x—ty p'deded floor the 1%ari Nance flood b;a ilmd[aro'd systern drat vac ab5egxrtlVdeoYbllm Z.-AR rd QteS that the former ftnd mrthd sysWm is being restored to powde pot,rton from the 1%arcual daaDe or peas flood ZONEA99 Aral to be protemed horn 19b annual chance flood W a Federal flood poasol *sleet utde oxarudbn; ro Base Rood Besebora tl arl n ed ZONEV Cmslail Rood flare with vdodty hazard(wae adw):no One Food Baaoradednmired ZONEVE Cop"flood IDK wth LelocRV hazard (w aton); Bas!eralFood �J�� Borsdeternined WA FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE Project Site 12=•^`N The floodvey is the the"ofd artyrm pVsany dOJ pa tfpmpan areas MM mat be lept Mee d emoachrae sol that the 1%anwel dunce Mood can be Owned without sutctamal Irneass m fWd heghis. OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZO NE x Areas of 0.2%anal dunce food,areas Of 1%an,el chance Mad with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 sgLmm orae,and areas pmtecsd by levees Iran 1yi amual Nano,food OOTHER AREAS ZONEX Ar dctemmredmbeaut9dedr 0.2%amu3lcherrefooatan ZONED Areas in Mach flood handsae urdetrmrea,but pssole. ® COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM(CBRS)AREAS ONE- OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS(01 1` ZONE AE CEP5 areas and AAs are mmW N beard wain Or aijaort to SpaW Rom Ha1atl Areas :ter 7 (fL X27 t%am,el.ri—floodpan boundary • --GII o�, 0.2%armlel chenm flooltlam boLr'dary AA ZONE X Fbodvay boundary `LONE AE — — Zeno D boundary Sf�JE' ................ CiatS am OcA baed9y I'•� .414 r L =� Nas E i)arrdary dradnq S>e<d Road Hazard Nw nines and rboundary dMdng Spedal Flood d oad FWA Adit se rt a O'L ti/D 'lt.or Flrnnad rFloodBe<tba,koddep9a«load edotal bue h `3(,11813 �ZONEXLM dFtare Allow,Amin 513— Bast:Rood Beadwbmadva(ue;elelbonrnfeet' 20N + (�967) Base Rood Eovaan vaae o 'whm uNorm zone:withinzone:elevaDart _ in(flet. Referenced North the t9 Amenlan Vertkal Detun of 3988 ZO NA E E + I � �O Cross section line s---0 Lm[M detail vas xaon hoe ZONE ne ,.:{_ZONE VE as ------8 Trarsad lR 'EL f]) avdMes rCren206 Ve rth Amrtan De6rn f 87`0745'.37°7230" doNo i9M(N(NaD 83),Wesm-n ransplere _. l0 �� "76"�N IOaDnxter UdscsalTe minse htratorgra0 solo.;nave •t u9c 0004Oo"end __ _ "ae"'E ZONE X n•ars a- 600000 FT system spore(RVSZONE fipsmne). .rename prc*CbDr .i OINS 10.7t�rG� ZONE VE ZONE VE OX5510 x Bench Irak(See etplaeflon in Note t0 Users Section Of the FIRM panel) e M1 5 foie Me Figure 10 FEMA Map Panel No. 36103CO018H FIWMD 2760 Whistler Drive Fishers Island, Town of Southold, NY ._..... ..., .- L.r,ae•aa.N,9R.a•nre luoxoorw '�KG Fisher's Island Critical Environmental Area (CEA) Effective Date of Designation: 3-16-90 Designating Agency: Suffolk County o�tfy''�(jl�t.ryrs rn•a •� ��+� ,S 1��' ru, 'rev,• `'.� w,�"si"., -j�'� _:..� '�., �a � � •� ��„• • s�4r t{L+K N� �COQ I' '« « f .__.. y } �:�+rw .*.4j�h• N •� . D •rr'«v14.w s' .... { Y'l %• ` ti ps-tel-.'�� saure �• W • t t�i _ Aria. .y.-�__�. � M� ra� y poll Idt�Nn FOLdo...� Legend 0 2 4 =Fisher's Island CEA Mlles Base Map 1 24,000 DOT Plammetric Image 1 Inch equals 1 miles Disclaimer This map was prepared by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation using the most current data available.It is deemed accurate but is not guaranteed NYS DEC is not responsible for any inaccuracies in the data Please contact the designating authority for additional information regarding legal boundary descriptions Figure 11 Peconic Bay and Environs Critical Environmental Area (CEA) Effective Date of Designation: 11-13-1988 Designating Agency- Suffolk County "—Long Island Sound - - ( muuk V i• ATLANTIC OCEAN Legend 0 3 6 12 For Adjacent CEAs see map Peconic Bay and Environs CEA 1 inch equals 6.75 miles Miles Suffolk County CEAs [ Adjacent CEA Southold County CEAs Village of Lloyd Harbor CEA Base Map: DOT 1:250,000 Atlas Images Town of Brookhaven CEAs Long Island Regional Planning CEAs Disclaimer:This map was prepared by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation using the most current data available It is deemed accurate but is not guaranteed NYS DEC is not responsible for any inaccuracies in the data.Please contact the designating authority for additional information regarding legal boundary descriptions. Figure 12 I 04 7r ♦ I � 1 � I r / r / r � r � r � r • I • I I 0 250 500 FT Quarter-Mile Study Area Residential Figure 13 Use Transportation Land Use Map commercial Vacant FIWMD Institutional - waste Facilities 2760 Whistler Drive Fishers Island, Town of Southold, NY _ Recreation/Open Space S urce(s)111 Sarvia Lay,r Clddl Ear,,MERE NL,,.Mapmy—1®Ope Spp 1p..nt.b.t r a n4 IAe GIS...... ,ty M= 121 L_Iakntl I...Into —Map June 19 201 pl Tovm of SoulapM lmenMa Ta.Map llatp.�aps maps arcgis cpMappvSplumris�s2 Mml2appb=lbJEd6laMbcdAroa19E25e99b5Jh901.Axes d-125201) • KGO APPENDIX A Full Environmental Assessment Form Part I -Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part I based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information;indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor;and,when possible,generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A&B. In Sections C,D&E,most items contain an initial question that must be answered either"Yes"or"No". If the answer to the initial question is"Yes",complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is"No",proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part l is accurate and complete. A.Project and Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities-Fishers Island Waste Management District Project Location(describe,and attach a general location map): 2760 Whistler Avenue,Fishers Island,NY 06390 Brief Description of Proposed Action(include purpose or need): The FIWMD is proposing to relocate its transfer station operations and equipment from a Town-owned parcel located at 58 Town Road to its existing compost station and receiving property located at 2760 Whistler Avenue. The proposed action would allow for the consolidation of staff and facilities on one property As part of the proposed action,the FIWMD would undertake site and facility upgrades to modernize its current operations,including an improved composting operation to decrease the amount of solid waste being transported and disposed of at facilities off-island(as there is no waste disposal on Fishers Island) See the attachment to this EAF for additional information I Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone:631-788-7455 Fishers Island Waste Management District E-Mail: fiwastemanagement@gmail com Address:P O Box 22 City/PO:Fishers Island State:NY Zip Code:06390 Project Contact(if not same as sponsor;give name and title/role): Telephone:516-522-2645 KGO Consulting,Inc,as environmental consultant,attn•Kim Gennaro-Oancea,M.S.,President E-Mail: kgennaro@kgoinc com Address: 626 RXR Plaza City/PO: State: Zip Code: Uniondale NY 111556 Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: 1 , Page l of 13 B.Government Approvals B.Government Approvals,Funding,or Sponsorship. ("Funding"includes grants,loans,tax relief,and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a.City Council,Town Board, mYes❑No Execution of leases TBD or Village Board of Trustees b.City,Town or Village ❑YesmNo Planning Board or Commission c.City Council,Town or ❑YesmNo Village Zoning Board of Appeals d.Other local agencies ❑YesmNo e.County agencies mYes❑NO Suffolk County Planning Commission-239 Referral TBD f.Regional agencies ❑YesmNo g. State agencies mYes❑No NYSDEC-SPDES General Permits and Facility Registration See bottom of page h.Federal agencies mYes❑NO FAA-Notice of Proposed Construction(FAA Filed 9/2016 Determination of No Hazard to 17460-1 Review) Air Navigation issued by FAA on 11/7/2016 i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area,or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? ®Yes❑No U. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? m Yes❑No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? m Yes❑No C.Planning and Zoning CA.Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption,or amendment of a plan,local law,ordinance,rule or regulation be the ❑YesmNo only approval(s)which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • If Yes,complete sections C,F and G. • If No,proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2.Adopted land use plans. a.Do any municipally-adopted (city,town,village or county)comprehensive land use plan(s)include the site ®Yes❑No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes,does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action ❑Yes®No would be located? *The subject property is a municipal solid waste management facility operating on the subject property since 1987. b.Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district(for example: Greenway mYes❑No Brownfield Opportunity Area(BOA);designated State or Federal heritage area;watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes,identify the plan(s): LWRP and 2 CEA's(Fishers Island and Peconic Bay and Environs) c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, ❑YesmNo or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes,identify the plan(s): Required NYSDEC Approvals (1)SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Industrial Activities(GP-0-12-001)(filing date is permit dependent),(2)SPDES General Permit )for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity(GP-0-15-002)(filing date is permit dependent),and(3)General Permit Registration-Consolidation of Facilities(Received Jan 2017) Page 2 of 13 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. ®Yes❑No If Yes,what is the zoning classification(s)including any applicable overlay district? Residential Low Density(3 acre)(R-120) b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ®Yes❑No c.Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? ❑Yes®No If Yes, i What is the proposed new zoning for the site? CA.Existing community services. a.In what school district is the project site located? Fishers Island School District b.What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? New York State Police c.Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? Fishers Island Fire Department d.What parks serve the project site? N/A-Municipal solid waste management facility D.Project Details D.1.Proposed and Potential Development a.What is the general nature of the proposed action(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial,recreational;if mixed,include all components)? Municipal waste handling and management facility(improvements to existing facility) b.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 1076* acres *Represents 9.33-ac FIWMD-owned parcel,plus b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed. +/-2 40 acres 2.7 ac.lease area(from Town),less the 1.27 ac _ 7 c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned area to be leased to Town. However,project site is limited to 3.23 ac. or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 9 33* acres c.Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? ®Yes❑No i If Yes,what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units(e.g.,acres,miles,housing units, square feet)? % 418+/-(square footage)* *See Below Units: d.Is the proposed action a subdivision,or does it include a subdivision? ❑Yes®No If Yes, i Purpose or type of subdivision?(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial;if mixed,specify types) ii Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? ❑Yes❑No in Number of lots proposed? iv Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum Maximum e.Will proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? ❑Yes®No i. If No,anticipated period of construction: 5 months ii. If Yes: • Total number of phases anticipated • Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) month year • Anticipated completion date of final phase month year • Generally describe connections or relationships among phases,including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: *Item D 1 c• Proposed action includes an additional 6,900-sf of building area(existing building area 1,650 sf)for the mixing and maintenance buildings However,the mixing building accommodates a composting operation that currently takes place and the maintenance building accommodates the current practice on-site Page 3 of 13 f.Does the project include new residential uses? ❑Yes®No If Yes,show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family four or more Initial Phase At completion of all phases g.Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction(including expansions)? ®Yes❑No If Yes, i.Total number of structures 2 ii Dimensions(in feet)of largest proposed structure: 25 height; 50 width; and 90 length Mining Building W. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: 2,400 square feet New Maintenance Building h.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any ❑Yes®No liquids,such as creation of a water supply,reservoir,pond,lake,waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: ii. If a water impoundment,the principal source of the water: ❑Ground water❑Surface water streams ❑Other specify: ni If other than water,identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. iv Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: million gallons;surface area: acres v Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: height; length _width vi Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure(e.g.,earth fill,rock,wood,concrete): D.2. Project Operations a.Does the proposed action include any excavation,mining,or dredging,during construction,operations,or both? ❑Yes®No (Not including general site preparation,grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? 1 ii. How much material(including rock,earth,sediments,etc.)is proposed to be removed from the site? • Volume(specify tons or cubic yards): • Over what duration of time? iii Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged,and plans to use,manage or dispose of them. iv Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? ❑Yes❑No If yes,describe. v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? acres vi What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? acres vii What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? feet viii Will the excavation require blasting? ❑Yes❑No ix Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: b.Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of,increase or decrease in size of,or encroachment ❑Yes®No into any existing wetland,waterbody,shoreline,beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected(by name,water index number,wetland map number or geographic description): Page 4 of 13 H. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland,e.g.excavation,fill,placement of structures,or alteration of channels,banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities,alterations and additions in square feet or acres: iii. Will proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? ❑Yes❑No If Yes,describe: iv Will proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: • expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion: • purpose of proposed removal(e.g.beach clearing,invasive species control,boat access): • proposed method of plant removal: • if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used,specify product(s): v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: c.Will the proposed action use,or create a new demand for water? ®Yes❑No If Yes: "Based upon water bills for the 2 existing i Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: 55t gallons/day facilities. ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? ®Yes❑No If Yes: • Name of district or service area: Fishers Island Water Works Corporation • Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? ®Yes[]No • Is the project site in the existing district? ®Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes®No • Do existing lines serve the project site? ®Yes❑No id Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? ❑Yes Flo If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: • Source(s)of supply for the district: iv Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? ❑YesmNo If,Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • Proposed source(s)of supply for new district: v If a public water supply will not be used,describe plans to provide water supply for the project: vi.If water supply will be from wells(public or private),maximum pumping capacity: NSA gallons/minute. d.Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? 0Yes❑No If Yes: i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: 55t gallons/day "Based upon water bills for the 2 facilities ii.Nature of liquid wastes to be generated(e.g.,sanitary wastewater,industrial; if combination,describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): Sanitary wastewater iii Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? ❑Yes®No If Yes: • Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: • Name of district: • Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No • Is the project site in the existing district? ❑Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes❑No Page 5 of 13 • Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? ❑Yes❑No • Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: iv Will a new wastewater(sewage)treatment district be formed to serve the project site? ❑Yes®No If Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? v. If public facilities will not be used,describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project,including specifying proposed receiving water(name and classification if surface discharge,or describe subsurface disposal plans): The existing on-site sanitay system located adjacent to the existing office/maintenance building would accommodate sanitary waste vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture,recycle or reuse liquid waste: N/A e.Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff,either from new point ®Yes❑No sources(i.e.ditches,pipes,swales,curbs,gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater)or non-point source(i.e.sheet flow)during construction or post construction? If Yes: i How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? Square feet or 0 79 acres(impervious surface)(Total impervious area post-development 144 acres) Square feet or 10 76 acres(parcel size) ii. Describe types of new point sources. Stormwater would be collected in catch basins and piped to a proposed stormwater detention(infiltration) basin iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed(i.e.on-site stormwater management facility/structures,adjacent properties, groundwater,on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? A stormwater detention(infiltration)basin is proposed for construction Stormwater infiltration units for roof runoff from the Mixing Building are also Jproposed • If to surface waters,identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: I • Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? ❑Yes®No iv Does proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces,use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? ®Yes❑No f. Does the proposed action include,or will it use on-site,one or more sources of air emissions,including fuel ®Yes❑No combustion,waste incineration,or other processes or operations? If Yes,identify: i.Mobile sources during project operations(e.g.,heavy equipment,fleet or delivery vehicles) Delivery/carting trucks Existing diesel-powered wheeled loader ii Stationary sources during construction(e.g.,power generation,structural heating,batch plant,crushers) Construction vehicles and recycling of concrete for reuse iii Stationary sources during operations(e.g.,process emissions,large boilers,electric generation) Electric generation for grinder g.Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f(above),require a NY State Air Registration,Air Facility Permit, ❑Yes®No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: L Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet ❑Yes❑No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application,the project will generate: • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide(CO2) • Tons/year(short tons)of Nitrous Oxide(N2O) • Tons/year(short tons)of Perfluorocarbons(PFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Sulfur Hexafluoride(SF6) • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons(HFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Hazardous Air Pollutants(HAPs) Page 6 of 13 h.Will the proposed action generate or emit methane(including,but not limited to,sewage treatment plants, ❑Yes®No* landfills,composting facilities)?*Proposed aerated static compost piles under a cover system maintains an aerobic process If Yes: i Estimate methane generation in tons/year(metric): ii.Describe any methane capture,control or elimination measures included in project design(e.g.,combustion to generate heat or electricity,flaring): L Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes,such as ❑Yes®No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes:Describe operations and nature of emissions(e.g.,diesel exhaust,rock particulates/dust): j.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial ❑Yes®No new demand for transportation facilities or services?*Based on FIWMD activity logs for a peak day in July and a peak day to September,it is projected that If Yes: the proposed consolidation would generate an additional 9-to-12 cars during a peak hour i When is the peak traffic expected(Check all that apply): ®Morning ❑Evening ❑Weekend *Based upon FIWMD faahty logs ElRandomly between hours of to ii For commercial activities only,projected number of semi-trailer truck trips/day: N/A id Parking spaces: Existing no formal spaces Proposed 12 Net increase/decrease 12 iv Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? ❑Yes®No v. if the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads,creation of new roads or change in existing access,describe: Internal driveway to be modified to create a one-way loop driveway_to permit safe and efficient circulation around the facility. vi Are public/private transportation service(s)or facilities available within %mile of the proposed site? ®Yes❑No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid,electric ❑Yes®No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii.Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing ❑Yes®No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k.Will the proposed action(for commercial or industrial projects only)generate new or additional demand ®Yes❑No for energy? If Yes: i Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: 79,350 kWh/year ti Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project(e.g.,on-site combustion,on-site renewable,via grid/local utility,or other): Fishers Island Electric Corporation iii. Will the proposed action require a new,or an upgrade to,an existing substation? ❑Yes®No 1.Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. L During Construction: it During Operations: • Monday-Friday: 7 30 am-5.30 pm • Monday-Friday: 7 30 am-4 30 pm • Saturday: 7 30 am-5 30 pm(on limited basis) • Saturday: 7 30 am-4 30 pm • Sunday: No construction • Sunday: 7 30 am-4 30 pm • Holidays: No construction • Holidays: Closed Page 7 of 13 m.Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, ®Yes❑No operation,or both? If yes: L Provide details including sources,time of day and duration: ,Temporary noise during construction Construction would occur during non-sensitive hours(7.30 am-5 30 pm),over an estimated 5 month-period Operational noise would occur with the loading and off-loading by hauling trucks,and operation of equipment. ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? ❑Yes®No Describe: n.. Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? ®Yes❑No If yes: L Describe source(s),location(s),height of fixture(s),direction/aim,and proximity to nearest occupied structures: Fixed lighting would be installed on the proposed maintenance and mixing buildings Pole lighting is also proposed to serve as security lighting. All lighting would be shielded and directed downwards to minimize light trespass ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? ❑Yes®No Describe: o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? ❑Yes®No If Yes,describe possible sources,potential frequency and duration of odor emissions,and proximity to nearest occupied structures: p.Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum(combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) El Yes®No or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: i Product(s)to be stored H. Volume(s) per unit time (e.g.,month,year) iii. Generally describe proposed storage facilities: q.Will the proposed action(commercial,industrial and recreational projects only)use pesticides(i.e.,herbicides, ❑Yes ®No insecticides)during construction or operation? If Yes: i Describe proposed treatment(s): H. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? ❑ Yes ❑No r.Will the proposed action(commercial or industrial projects only)involve or require the management or disposal ® Yes []No of solid waste(excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i Describe any solid waste(s)to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: • Construction: o` tons per (unit of time)*proposed reuse of deteriorated concrete • Operation : 0* tons per (unit of time)*See bottom of page ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: • Construction: Areas of deteriorated concrete(proposed to be replaced)would be reused in the proposed internal roadway • Operation: The proposed action would increase the volume of materials composted thus available to the community Proposed action would also reduce the amount of wastes to be transported off-site for disposal. iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: • Construction: No construction materials are expected to be disposed of off-site • Operation: The FIWMD contracts licensed carters to transport waste to off-island facilities in the State of Connecticut *The FIWMD handles a total of approximately 800 tons/year of wastes generated and received from residents and businesses on the Island Page 8 of 13 s.Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? ®Yes❑ No If Yes: L Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site(e.g.,recycling or transfer station,composting,landfill,or other disposal activities): Composting and transfer station for MSW,recyclables,bulky wastes and wood/brush.(+/-800 tons/year) ii Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: +/-67 Tons/month,if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment,or • N/A Tons/hour,if combustion or thermal treatment iii. If landfill,anticipated site life: N/A years t.Will proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation,treatment,storage,or disposal of hazardous ❑Yes®No waste? If Yes: i Name(s)of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated,handled or managed at facility: ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: v Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? ❑Yes❑No If Yes:provide name and location of facility: If No:describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: E.Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.I.Land uses on and surrounding the project site a.Existing land uses. i Check all uses that occur on,adjoining and near the project site. ❑ Urban ® Industrial ® Commercial ® Residential(suburban) ❑ Rural(non-farm) ❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ® Other(specify):Airport,Institutional(School)and Community Center ii If mix of uses,generally describe: b.Land uses and covertypes on the project site.*see Below Land use or Current Acreage After Change Covertype Acreage Project Completion (Acres+/-) • Roads,buildings,and other paved or impervious surfaces 065 144 +0.79 • Forested 051 051 0 • Meadows,grasslands or brushlands(non- agricultural,including abandoned agricultural) 4 79 4 79 0 • Agricultural 0 0 0 (includes active orchards,field,greenhouse etc.) • Surface water features (lakes,ponds,streams,rivers,etc.) 0 0 0 • Wetlands(freshwater or tidal) 1 04 1 04 0 • Non-vegetated(bare rock,earth or fill) 350 1 83 -167 • Other Describe:Landscaping/Lawn 027 1 15 +088 *Upon implementation of the lease agreements,the compost station property(with the proposed transfer station operations)would be 10 76±acres(9 33±acres+2 7±acres— 1 27±acres),however,the actual facility or operational area would occupy only 3.23±acres,which consists of paved/impervious,non-vegetated and landscaping/lawn areas - Page 9 of 13 c.Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? ❑Yes❑✓ No L If Yes: explain: d.Are there any facilities serving children,the elderly,people with disabilities(e.g.,schools,hospitals,licensed ®Yes❑No day care centers,or group homes)within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i. Identify Facilities: The Fishers Island School is located approximately 500 feet to the east of the main entrance driveway to the subject property The Fishers Island community center is located across Fox Lane to the north and east of the subject property. e.Does the project site contain an existing dam? ❑Yes®No If Yes: i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: • Dam height: feet • Dam length: feet • Surface area: acres • Volume impounded: gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam's existing hazard classification: iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: f.Has the project site ever been used as a municipal,commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, ®Yes❑No or does the project site adjoin property which is now,or was at one time,used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i Has the facility been formally closed? [:]Yes® No • If yes,cite sources/documentation: ii Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: The subject property is an existing solid waste management facility used for composting and for receiving bulky wastes(construction debris, furniture,mattresses,etc.),electronic wastes,and scrap metals Wastes are then transported for handling/disposal at licensed facilities in Connecticut iii Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: N/A-The subject property is an existing solid waste management facility g.Have hazardous wastes been generated,treated and/or disposed of at the site,or does the project site adjoin ❑Yes®No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat,store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i Describe waste(s)handled and waste management activities,including approximate time when activities occurred: h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site,or have any ®Yes❑ No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site ®Yes❑No Remediation database? Check all that apply: ❑ Yes—Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ® Yes—Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): 152241 ❑ Neither database ii If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities,describe control measures: iii Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? []No ®Yes If yes,provide DEC ID number(s):152241 iv If yes to(i),(ii)or(iii)above,describe current status of site(s): Site 152241 is Fort H G Wright a 412-acre former coastal defense installation within which the subject property is located In 2007.the USACE completed a Site Inspection of the Fort under the Military Munitions Response Program and a Remedial Investigation(RI)in select areas of overall Fort H G Wright property was recommended to further investigate Munitions and Explosives of Concern s ,however,no MECs were tound on the site Also,the USAGE performed due diligence work under the Formerly Used Defense Sites(FUDS)program Six USTs and a transformer(not within the project area)are planned for removal by the USACE in FY2017 Page 10 of 13 v Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? ❑YesmNo • If yes,DEC site ID number: • Describe the type of institutional control(e.g.,deed restriction or easement): • Describe any use limitations: • Describe any engineering controls: • Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? ❑Yes❑No • Explain: E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a.What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? 300 feet b.Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? ❑YesmNo If Yes,what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? % c.Predominant soil type(s)present on project site: RhB Riverhead and Haven soils,Graded,0-8%) 18 % Remaining Fs(Fill land,sandy)-10%and Es(Escarpments)-3%. CuC(Cut and Fill Land,Sloping,8-15%) 53 % These soils are not within the development area P CuB (Cut and Fill Land,Gently Sloping, -8%) 17 d.What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: 18 feet*Below grade surface within the project area e.Drainage status of project site soils:® Well Drained: 100%of site ❑ Moderately Well Drained: %of site ❑ Poorly Drained %of site f.Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: ® 0-10%: 67 %of site Represents the slopes on 3.23 acres of the overall 10.76-acre site All areas outside ® 10-15%: 10 %of site of this project area would remain unaffected(no disturbance or development) ® 15%or greater: 23 %of site g.Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? ❑YesmNo If Yes,describe: h. Surface water features. i Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies(including streams,rivers, " ®Yes❑No ponds or lakes)? Not within Project Site. ii Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? ®Yes❑No If Yes to either i or ii,continue. If No,skip to E.2.i. iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, ®Yes❑No state or local agency? iv. For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site,provide the following information: • Streams: Name Classification • Lakes or Ponds: Name Classification • Wetlands: Name Federal Waters,Tidal Wetlands,NYS Wetland Approximate Size NYS Wetland • Wetland No.(if regulated by DEC) NL-13 in acres-1 1) v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired []Yes ONo waterbodies? If yes,name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: i.Is the project site in a designated Floodway? ❑YesmNo j.Is the project site in the 100 year Floodplain? *The areas of proposed improvements are located outside the loo year floodplain [Z]Yes❑NO k.Is the project site in the 500 year Floodplain? ❑YesW]No 1.Is the project site located over,or immediately adjoining,a primary,principal or sole source aquifer? [Z]Yes[--]No If Yes: i.Name of aquifer:Sole Source Aquifer Names Nassau-Suffolk SSA Page 11 of 13 in. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: Suburban and Coastal Wildlife and Avian Species n.Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? mYes❑No If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community(composition,function,and basis for designation): Marine Rocky Intertidal -Rarity G5,S1S2(Demonstrably secure globally,Critically Imperiled or Imperiled in New York) ii. Source(s)of description or evaluation: NYSDEC Environmental Resource Mapper iii Extent of community/habitat: • Currently: 63.0 acres • Following completion of project as proposed: 63.0 acres The proposed action includes site improvements within the • Gain or loss(indicate+or-): 0 acres' developed footprint of the subject property and adjoining lease area o.Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as m Yes❑No endangered or threatened,or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? However,the proposed action Includes site improvements within the developed footprint of the subject property and adjoining lease area Only existing impervious surface and earth/fill/cleared areas would be affected The proposed action would not Impact natural areas p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare,or as a species of ❑YesmNo special concern? y.Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting,trapping,fishing or shell fishing? ❑YesmNo If yes,give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to ❑YesmNo Agriculture and Markets Law,Article 25-AA,Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: b.Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? ❑YesmNo i If Yes:acreage(s)on project site? ii. Source(s)of soil rating(s): c. Does the project site contain all or part of,or is it substantially contiguous to,a registered National ❑YesmNo Natural Landmark? If Yes: i Nature of the natural landmark: ❑Biological Community ❑ Geological Feature ii. Provide brief description of landmark,including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: d.Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? mYes❑No If Yes: i. CEA name: Fishers Island,Peconlc Bay and Environs ii Basis for designation: Benefit to human health&protect drinking water,Protect public health,water,vegetation,&scenic beauty iii Designating agency and date: Date 3-16-90,Date•7-12-88,Agency Suffolk County Page 12 of 13 e.Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district ❑Yes®No which is listed on,or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on,the State or National Register of Historic Places? If Yes: i.Nature of historic/archaeological resource: El Archaeological Site ❑Historic Building or District n Name: iii Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: f.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for *®Yes❑No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory?*ConsultationswithSHPOwill be undertaken. g.Have additional archaeological or historic site(s)or resources been identified on the project site? ❑Yes®No If Yes: L Describe possible resource(s): h. Basis for identification: h.Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal,state,or local ❑Yes®No scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i. Identify resource: U.Nature of,or basis for,designation(e.g.,established highway overlook,state or local park,state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): iii Distance between project and resource: miles. L Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild,Scenic and Recreational Rivers ❑Yes®No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i. Identify the name of the river and its designation: h. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? ❑Yes❑No F.Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal,please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Fishers Island Waste Management District,prepared Applicant/Sponsor Name by KGO Consulting,Inc.,as environmental consultant Date June 29,2017 Signature Title President Kim Gennaro-Oancea,M S,AICP CEP I PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 Part 1 Environmental Assessment Form-Attachment Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Item A. Description of the Proposed Action The Fishers Island Waste Management District(FIWMD)is a special district of the Town of Southold created for the purpose of providing solid waste handling and management to the residents and businesses of Fishers Island. The FIWMD currently operates two facilities on separate properties,as follows: (1) The transfer station is located at 58 Town Road, Fishers Island and is part of an overall 178±-acre,Town of Southold-owned property(Suffolk County Tax Map[SCTM]No:District 1000-Section 12-Block 1-Lot 18), which includes the Elizabeth Field Airport. The transfer station facility is located on approximately 1.44 acres at the eastern portion of the Town-owned land. The transfer station receives municipal solid waste (MSW) and recyclables,such as corrugated cardboard,bottles,cans,plastic containers,and mixed recyclable fibers, from residents and the limited commercial/business facilities on Fishers Island. (2) The compost station and receiving facility for other wastes is located on an approximately 9.33 acre-parcel of land located at 2760 Whistler Avenue(SCTM No:District 1000-Section 12-Block 1-Lot 1.1) (hereinafter referred to as the"compost station"or"subject property"),but also occupies a portion of the above-described Town-owned land. Solid waste management activities at the compost station include the following: (1) processing(grinding/chipping)and then composting of brush,logs and yard waste in open windrows which is then made available for purchase by landscapers and residents; (2) receiving of construction and demolition (C&D) debris,bulky wastes (e.g., furniture, mattresses, etc.), electronic wastes ("e-wastes") and scrap metals, all of which are then transported off-Island via licensed carters to various disposal and management facilities in the State of Connecticut;and(3)operation of a swap/reuse area to receive unwanted household items for reuse by others(e.g.,bicycles,furniture,and other similar items). The FIWMD has owned and operated a solid waste management facility on the compost station property for approximately 30 years. Prior to this use,the subject property was utilized for military purposes as part of the larger Fort H.G. Wright and remnants of the batteries and one look-out post exist today. In the mid- century, Fort H.G. Wright was closed as a coastal defense facility and the land was transferred to various entities,including the U.S.Coast Guard,the U.S.Navy,the Fishers Island Union Free School,and the Town of Southold. In 1987,the subject property was transferred to the FIWMD. There is no waste collection or disposal on Fishers Island. All wastes,other than compost,requires transport off the Island via licensed carters to permitted facilities in the State of Connecticut. None of the facilities receive or handle hazardous wastes. Rather, once per month, the FIWMD coordinates with licensed carters to pick up household hazardous wastes for appropriate handling and disposal. It is the intent of the FIWMD to consolidate these facilities on the site of the compost station and receiving facility, which has been owned and operated as a solid waste management facility for 30 years. The proposed improvements would modernize the current operation,including the implementation of single-stream recycling and an increase in wastes that can be composted and taken out of the disposal stream. Also included are site repairs, drainage improvements,as well as improvements to site security. Upon implementation of the proposed action,the 1.44-acre parcel occupied by the transfer station would be vacated and the lease terminated. 1 Part 1 Environmental Assessment Form-Attachment Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Below is a description of the proposed improvements: (A) Transfer Station and Receiving Areas 1. Installation of four compactor boxes for MSW,cardboard,and single-stream recyclables. 2. Addition of portable bins to receive food/organic wastes. 3. Installation of five open top boxes(roll-off containers)for scrap metal and bulky wastes. 4. Relocation of a 240-square-foot(sf)modular building from the existing transfer station to the subject property for use in collecting residential e-waste, discarded small maintenance equipment [e.g., mowers,trimmers,hand tools],and similar wastes. S. Placement of a 600-sf pre-engineered storage shed for use by the community to dispose of unwanted items for reuse by others. A swap area currently exists at the subject property,but items are placed outdoors and susceptible to weathering and damage (which results in reusable items having to be carted off-site for disposal). The swap shop would serve to store and protect reusable items. (B) Composting Operations 1. Construction of a 4,500-sf pre-engineered mixing building for the purpose of indoor processing and mixing organics for composting. The proposed mixing building would be located on the southwest side of the internal roadway,opposite the MSW receiving areas.Within the mixing building would be one or more grinders with hopper and stand to grind food waste,cardboard and other fibers,and a reinforced concrete bin wall area to temporarily hold and mix organics before they are added to the composting process. 2. Installation of two concrete pads with a cover system for the enclosure of the compost heaps. The proposed cover system would provide for controlled aeration,moisture control by protecting piles from precipitation,and leachate collection for recirculation into the piles. A mobile control box will be used to monitor the temperature of the composting material while maintaining adequate air supply to maintain ideal composting conditions and insure the heap does not convert to anaerobic activity. A finished concrete compost pad would also be constructed. (C) General Facility and Site Improvements 1. Construction of a 2,400-sf pre-engineered building adjacent to the existing office/maintenance building for the purpose of providing adequate maintenance, repair and equipment storage space. Upon construction of the new maintenance building,the existing office/maintenance building would be converted to serve only as administrative space. Interior renovations and the replacement of select windows are also proposed.' 1 During site plan preparation,the project engineer submitted the preliminary plan to the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA) as the subject property is adjacent to the Elizabeth Field Airport. In correspondence dated October 24,2016,the FAA determined that the four building corner elevations for the proposed mixing building are not to exceed the following: Northeast Corner-31 feet above ground level(58 feet above mean sea level);Northwest Corner-39 feet above ground level(66 feet above mean sea level);Southeast Corner-25 feet above ground level(52 feet above mean sea level);and Southwest Corner-32 feet above ground level(59 feet above mean sea level). In accordance with the FAA's determination,the building elevations were modified and refiled with the FAA. In correspondence dated November 7,2016,the FAA determined that"...the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not have a hazard to air navigation. 2 Part 1 Environmental Assessment Form-Attachment -- Fishers Island Waste Management District j Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities 2. Partial replacement and reinforcement of the existing concrete bunker walls, including the installation of pedestrian guard rails along the elevated disposal platforms in accordance with relevant OSHA(Occupational Safety and Health Administration)standards. 3. Demolition of the deteriorating ceilings of concrete structures in two locations and backfilling of these areas with soil and compacted. 4. Installation of a truck scale to use in weighing in-bound and out-bound materials. 5. Improvements to site security, including the installation of chain link fencing around the facility perimeter, swing gates at the entry, site lighting and security cameras. All lighting would be designed in accordance with the standards set forth in Chapter 172 of the Town Code (Outdoor Lighting). 6. Installation of a new, one-way, paved loop driveway extending from the existing access and the construction of 12 formal parking spaces adjacent to the attendant shed near the waste drop-off areas. 7. Installation of a stormwater detention basin, stormwater infiltration units, as well as a pump system and holding tank for on-site stormwater reuse. Rain barrels adjacent to the mixing building are also being considered for the collection of water for reuse in the composting operation. As a portion of the current facility is situated on Town-owned land, including the site access, the internal paved driveway,attendant shed,concrete pad and portions of the receiving area,the proposed action includes entering into a lease for that area. The proposed lease area is 2.7±acres,although much of this area is and would not be improved. In exchange for the lease of 2.7±acres from the Town,the FIWMD would lease an area of approximately 1.27±acres at the northern extent of the subject property to the Town as such area contains a Town-operated sewer pump station. Upon implementation of the lease agreements,and for the purpose of this environmental review,the FIWMD compost station and receiving property would consist of currently-owned,9.33±-acre parcel,minus the area to be leased to the Town of Southold (1.27± acres), plus the area to be leased from the Town (2.7± acres),which totals 10.76± acres; However,the actual facility or operational area would occupy only 3.23±acres. The proposed action would result in an increase in the area of impervious surfaces by 0.79±acre as well as an increase in the area of lawn,landscaping and planted vegetation (includes the proposed stormwater basin) by 0.88±acre, of which 0.7±acre would consist of a native,ground cover seed mix,left unmaintained. The remaining 0.18±acre would include an area of evergreens at the northern portion of the project site to serve as additional buffering to adjacent residential properties. The proposed action would result in a decrease in the non-vegetated areas by 1.67 acres. There would be no disturbance or alterations to the areas of natural vegetation or wetlands found outside of the project area,but on the overall 10.76±acres evaluated herein. Overall,approximately 2.4 acres of the 3.23±-acre project site would be disturbed. Prior to and during construction, erosion and sedimentation controls would be undertaken to minimize the potential impacts associated with land disturbance activities, including stockpile protection, inlet sediment control devices for storm structure protection, silt fencing,and anti-tracking pads to prevent off-site sediment tracking from construction vehicles. On the west side of the facility,within an area that is currently is comprised of exposed soils as ground cover,the area would be seeded with a native,non-invasive grass mix and an erosion control blanket would be placed thereon to serve as a permanent protective covering during seed establishment. A gravity retaining wall would also be installed. 3 Part 1 Environmental Assessment Form-Attachment Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Based upon records of materials removed from the Island and estimates of materials used in the compost operation, the FIWMD facilities handle approximately 792.5 tons of solid waste per year and there is no projected change in the total volume handled upon implementation of the proposed action. It is important to note that the implementation of single-stream recycling and the improvements to composting facilities would,however,result in an increase in the amount of waste that can be composted,thus reducing the amount of waste to be hauled off-Island for disposal. Item D.2.e. Stormwater Management and Reuse The subject property is without a stormwater management system. The proposed action includes drainage improvements, including the installation of a stormwater detention basin, adjacent to the site access and partially within the right-of-way of Whistler Avenue, as well as the use of stormwater infiltration units for roof runoff. According to the site engineer,the proposed stormwater detention basin has been designed to be the largest that can be accommodated due to the existing concrete structures,foundations and subgrade tunnels,as well as the existing topography and natural areas that are to remain undisturbed. Based on the proposed design, stormwater from an area of approximately 45,000 sf(1.03±acres)would be collected in proposed catch basins along the internal roadway and then piped to a Stormceptor©(or similar)system for pretreatment before discharging to the basin. The proposed action also includes measures for stormwater reuse. Specifically,the proposed stormwater detention basin would also be designed to include a pump system to allow for the reuse of collected and pretreated stormwater, when available in heavy rain events. Such water can be used in the composting operation,if needed,as well as for the wash-down of surfaces, thus requiring no additional water from the public supply for its operations. Rain barrels adjacent to the mixing building are also being considered for the collection of water for reuse in the composting operation. The proposed stormwater management plan would be subject to approval of the Town of Southold Building Department. Item D.2.c.Water Supply Potable water is provided by the Fishers Island Water Works Corporation. There are no new water connections to the proposed maintenance or mixing buildings. Review of water bills from July 2015 through May 2016 indicates that the total combined water usage at the two facilities was 20,101 gallons or an estimated average of 55 gallons per day (gpd). For the purpose of analysis,it is assumed that,upon implementation of the proposed action,the consolidated facility would use the combined volume of water(i.e.,55 gpd)with no projected change to the water demand. Item D.2.d.Sanitary Disposal Sanitary waste is and would continue to be accommodated on-site via an existing subgrade, individual on-septic system located on the west side of the office/maintenance building. The existing sanitary system was installed in year 2000. Based upon the"Project Density Loading Rates&Design Sewage Flow Rates" set forth by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services,the design flow factor for the existing 1,650 sf office/maintenance building is 0.06 gpd/sf(non-medical office space),thus resulting in a calculated generation volume of 99±gpd. However,the actual volume is less based upon the reported water usage in the aforementioned water bills. There is no projected change in sanitary discharge as there are no new systems proposed and there are no increases in staff. 4 Part 1 Environmental Assessment Form-Attachment Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Item D.2.j. Traffic and Parking The proposed action would result in a reduction in the volume of waste to be transported off the Island,and would therefore result in a decrease in the number of trucks having to visit the Island for waste pick-up and container drop- off. Currently,hauling trucks visit both the transfer station and composting station. From the Fishers Island Ferry pier,trucks travel approximately 3/a mile to the transfer station. Upon implementation of the proposed action,hauling trucks would travel the approximately 0.2 mile distance from the pier to the subject property,thus removing truck traffic on Whistler Avenue to the transfer station.The proposed action may result in an additional 9-to-12 cars in a peak hour,based upon FIWMD records for the current operations. However,the transfer station is open only half- days on Tuesday,Saturday and Sunday,and closed on Thursday. The proposed consolidated facility would result in the availability of the transfer station to.full days during the week and half-days on the weekend. As such, the projected traffic increase is expected to be less than 9-to-12 cars in a peak hour. The proposed project would also create 12 formal parking spaces for patrons to safely park and unload materials. 5 J M M •-� '^ail. TA Aw -44 +�..-i „',.,r.. ., '•fir �- � w F ..,�'y}'�, Y f- ".s a .'tYaFii* � `� 1y L"'R i � s.:. tiyi+ ..-', ;:6 - ! Y✓ �J� 7 ,Y. _ as Omrr 1 ...N�� +"�,"r ��v,t'" 'X71, •� ' � � � � � • � e Go gle Earthfeet 500 meters 100 ' Approximate Boundary of Solid Waste Management Facility L - — - I Silver Eel Cove J (l� LZ Compost Station A 10o Q , SFishers IslanCll✓ •rnR A a 02016G6091e Google Earth s • I ' / xn DIWERr✓ A[NrcRvmeEs,WC. PROPOem EIIxE � � 4 p 3>+ B hs ;�,''�,,'•;'i` •; tt x..s"rz`nuiwc`m�xr ,' .,,..,,,.,�,. 4 ,%; f�;"fir,, `• ? ,��, -'!••--�s�'n o+ a0>n, --l-PROPE—INE g �*' 1 t,sca�_�,I�+ ,� wO• / ®`� �•4Y• ,i "��\�\.\`• ��\• \� ' °,�� _ _ / • P0.0POEEO LEASE LINE ANCHOR x� sueo°a / '�'^W i'�' ��Rqy Ill_• •�g�,,° �`,,,ii',� J ' 4n ENGINEERINGSERVICES ING u.as...•.vo m��...e.+. / __ 4 PROPOSEDSITEIMPROVEMENTS� two -..�""- fl91ER515lANo W EMENT DIETIxCI Jam/ sc,LEi=sa 1p0 PROPOSED LEASE LIMIT ux - Nene "n 1 9 / 1 60� \ �y iH ES DENDES R E TGS ! ^•, \PA;59 tf')� WSNOE FOU •<\�691854'E o,l /ii%.'.:� \\\ R�\)°g3 E9\°9 Jll 9500 :.\\�`\• _ \.093\10508 a53•' \'O Ea SO J , 9- - FROPEF 54 I I a r,'�'\\\•,1 1'r��; � XP9, LI A /`/ E _ .f ;0\yc .4 ;, \', `• 1Wp5tE MpN RETm\"n� __ \��;`.��'�\��;,,��\'= �/;;'./_ "��_ _ ��_ ° /'��" , w _ ;.'\ "/;; :,_ ->,_"l art cu •_fir'" ;I , 1 il__,__ L0�0.8ER �,�:��:�,•,��`\'\;\�j`\- �"" � Pp0.�' ?`,O� � ,I" r r - E clow uNK r x I •__ I 1`rBR1R OONCRETE�_ ��- E1EM\f,R ____ sEaRtn swlnO OATS / (INERT MA3ERMLS"____ -MAINTENUtCE .1)L3\ � eua ea�,1 'ux ' ••. - I I ,i ,� \ 1 `�' 1�•__ %�� \: Eaj LR NVERT EXIST IN ru'rr xrs°st nOAL oAR,r DBouN/ fiB if^{)Lgi FETING SPACE RIAG'FOIPWOOV °0, �_ _ �( ,;',Ir - •. \ `te```=_�E,snwR\y / m�av .\a° [�� 6 � E ___ °ZNI,'em �0 1 1 0 Mt5 HfP1 GPNpNPN vN `�fl`-_ •`COMPOSING. -- I / £ p4 ,� °2 L,'G O PPO =2F t:�N ,PO° I /A - •.AREA O' 9 .Y a 1( r wRDJNO i 1\ r / y r� _S ATION 10, PaoPOseo LEwsELwE \ 1�1�•\:``\\ xEo con , , r; Hp.'AAIN LINK PEaIMErER / PExtE ♦ - \1111` l / _ GU0 ry / HD \`�.�``\```•�•'�__ _` _a,`1 ___ - - •s_' I Vim```•_F. •`_` _-'•`-,a-.__-__--_ .0— I O $EDRORANIARCONN CONETOPOOEDBUIDINBS- \ - --\i -- ' EZIsnxGttuxE3 AL LIGHTING TO BE DARK SKY COMPLIANT :j'/UB ° OUNDY o °NE ANCHOR f 1- ED SITE IMPROVEMENTS EMENTS ' M1 PREPARED— p20NE Pf'" B MNO FIS R8IEIANDWASTE MANAGEMENTDIETRICT OVERALL LAYOUT PLAN SCALE 1'=lo - ven5 NO 2 O° 9 c AND PAINTED SIOP dna �� ><�.�F •�i"I C� �� \\•-• w` -.,,F Lf/VE� c�.6G`F5�65 ' I' _ eavlwfnva D E f,/p /1� 1 ��``,\ - ELE wceGwa 0.d.•' Dr- WRE WPB �__,� ♦`, ,,,\��``.,;�„\, \,, /; __/ i�^_ _ ______ __ - _'4o BIT CURB \ .•/�;.. \”°°pWER 'I„:,\`��; `�':��'"- a_•p'' c��/ Sr _ •..,_:,tee.,,• .. ,, ,\,,,,____—__________ ___ "— ___ P O I / _ 'r,`• _ cmz`_`— , -- _ \ R s ' I BRIO•CONCRETE _'_ - __ _ - _'"1 UY-'_a , p' ' ' I r' INERT MATERML_B - � _"__. , __ `__ ('-• -'MAINTENANCE �` ,tT' `,MSR -------- `,I '/:-----;• '� ,1T CONVERT EXISTING ---_;_.�• .PPD � I G®RNLd�I�M[O '? f \\, ORESE 2388 E� A9.1 MEETING SPACE s•IEDNAN NN_- coT� ADS tF' PNr.A ... \ d _ GRINDER/SNREDDFJI�/ —b\\k; r �' \ SSON 5 � � I l`=•� o%'r '1, \\ :CONCRETE ^'tPy6j P\W P� •�\\, c a 1 --/ --- - -—- - _RRLV�xDn \/ ,r 1 ------------ V:;::`:?:;/ .-:.F=c, i„'-- o F' 128 rDd• wak'c a” — / \ _� `_-- _�• d/,/ `� FEN m \ / N/ ND _ �'•;� \\\ ----- •�r, f E o,�`- b'c /gga•• / R•. WES N PH '`, \ COMDOSTING , I u ,GZt 1 f / DO�UNQ , S\O CPNPVP AREA PRD 5 p I •`,�, \ '-\�' __ _______ _ _ ___ ______ ____ , �.\ 'I�I' ESE t�!I __ ______ / `, rp emE aolnexD' m - \ • -�lN?i \\ �`, i ,• E WASiE�MGE [�GSED I M • 6 , r GTjO __�C_ _ __ i \ \ \X.' / FRQM EL N•THAN MN I ' `:•"-- `•----�:\'; (\ '\ _ _ __„�— ----- abs "sdoA6Jl I ON 0 , e _ , , , _ \ P P S \ •., a /i =05 RUG 50.26pRCAM Dub FDR \� ---_-� 11 ---F---- connasryRcdEAR"-__ ', / `1�`. _� ...' /_ "_ \' .�• ��•`,, ' /, "':r �,moi"_ ` r — --_ -T _ ,,f1x�sNED COeNOST PAq ___ _ 'err'L// I, \1 `' ___ __—S0 \ ""__' _ _ ___ /i'.: :`• II I......PER—ERPENCE \ \ ANCHOR ENGINEER-SERVICEa -____ OPERir E.sa.m , / Sid - I A R6 c oT Nc '�•- _ — ` ` �, (� \ f PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS , \2 ------ " `-`.`o �— _-� \ / w�nRED FOR E kkf _________ - Y �l /: Plva¢Rs auwD renAxncEnEerr DlnRler DN - � VRDAOSED PARIUN45PACE RYP OFID --------- •• �/ _ f _ =� SITE LAYOUT&UTILITY PLAN ( / RFLOGpTFD E%IETMD ATn[NDAIiTBRED _ '`\\`\\`••'\,`,,`•\___—.,:r' '• , i ' \\\• \\./ •k" •'cDnraDErecaaaRD.Nles eou✓;¢noN' M'N'• _______ _ sxxuEcr �wre w � _ "" x .Y•`• ,suLe.l= /'.n wxoun ArE NdAs 3sNERs rs 9D 533- P 1 39'4 ' 91 69- ----------- w CONCR "TE �AND PH ,'RETAINING VV4LL F— 'AD S HOUSE OF' rsoNo 644 54 4454 p 22 'k�AjXCE MAINTME Mumma 4Wx5W FF-1&3 R PAVED PARKING IMR, % P/c Cc=Exi E 0 s ------------ I,STOP ---------—— 6' SIGN P vc INV-137 PAD Sz 13'0 1 'UCA: D—SH—FOR L- 17,*4o0' ..I- :R ROUN�NC—RE m 1� E_ M.—O A SOIL AND _M A.. -I IOR. (�. L04NGROOFunits bN - PP ------------- UK 26 ---------- / - \ FLOODk ONE x 0 —LE 1120 Ilk --------z -------- - --------- ------------------ ANCHOR 'LOODZO��E AE ANCHOR PR.POSE ------ FAMM M.— OFR—RE.FOR ;N ----------------- SITE IMPROVEM;N A GRADINGS DRAINAGE DESIGN All,�G' of Pts uN I oo ---STR s, z�. no 4 � 9 �uNCRETE B9 19, 1 LE L192 BY 040- [OWE, 'S 39*45-33,,E 9169' CONCRETE PAD NO L AL zz, 4�K vt AD 644 54 M, Afly ------------ ----------- –7– --- 0551 rF-- _-22 'NING �ls ' Ue, n 0 PAVED c PARKING o It --Op STOF 6- SIGN R i Don 3.o ROCKS Al� -40 Popc FLOG 'Y - ----------- ------ ANCHOR F'LO()D"- OPDSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS p ZONE A ---------- MNB f MNS PR i GO FE—ED FOR -------------- EROSIO SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOONG LF INA 5 9 X. mmw ADD Dxx.mNG. ma" STC 4501 Precast Concrete Stormceplor �DDNw m �.DD (450 U.S.Gallon Capacity) O P$ m.wxDa `�D.w — _ a Do.Dxl...a .Ia,aa / caermmoam ZRP — Oa°a ne�ina To - xowaeDa SA Faathed GretlD __ __Q_ _ __ 1 I roDTu+D xw•ex wxo xrxu, f xuv.x.v i AhV_Te Maml Grade CHAINLINK SWINGING GATEaPDn+ OWN See NDIe2 MNI78• Ig• RlIff Im : "`°a"''�°DDv"`".'.°.x"".'"w�`°�""v " D�° �»°.°�x".°,1"..a^°..a•DUGG. CHAINLINK FENCE o°mPge BY QIP HIn •ilml amN EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SLOPE INSTALLATION g POST DETAIL 1"'G'd01O ND roxG a xmm s nRaPmed " 3,-0' STOP BAR --I a• xD.m.GG �. Inmr»xare (tee Opemnp to Fm Sde Wd) a•Iaw NGNEamaa°m PEDESTRIAN RAILING EMBEDDED Sema Ibm Chamber PI=VIew 2'-O'IN S'O CONCRETE ANCHOR 0 1.'STO WEIGHT PIPE I TbeOxOfFleuble CoaormomuRerammmddat lLc laluaodOdlaWhae Apphra6le 2 N Cover S8odd6e P.M.d O-TSe Ide Omp Pipe®d78e OR Pad- 3 3@o5tom%eptorSyslemuprotectdhymeormomoflhefoaawmgUS Pa= a:awweo°Dlm �w mua;® #5753115,#5849181,#6068765,#6371690 97582116,0866303 3 DT l4Camacla CommePipeDlvmamreprtsmu6re fmfunhad9r l+ow4sW®Ihu dNwaiy Y Y'STDWEIGHTPIPE STOP SIGN awNDa Evuv"xrox POST®S'-O"O C MAX ° x - DGNTmalx'nq wpx°nluletpns avvGV"noxvuevww¢euecvrmx[mmFO °uvuua _ TOP OF PAVEMENT Ed Ic nnl � �PDvwix° � - eccaemscD J 7 qk ° >>of.o]'1L Is wxixuxixiow[sLOal O nu CON CRETE POST Lx nwNDwn I axe n®Dcaxo umwxwrw°axxwaG ANCHOR e w CONCRETE PAD II ♦ i � xovmaGufi CONCRETE BLOCK GRAVITY RETAINING WALL DETAIL xD.maGG � =1 B"° ^— Dax^ .,^... PEDESTRIAN GUARD RAIL DETAIL INLET SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE 1 PARKING STALL DETAILS TURF ESTABLISHMENT a I alp,D °� 6 : maw xmm G, •� - - - �le�a,� ;lel ANCHORI DxDw �xi_RI>m�mP�a x ELEVATION SECTION vcv . ANTI-TRACKING PAD DETAIL noNc "cPROF SED SITE IMPROVEMENTS vasmwra-Ruml xarm�^•• �RmTEAREDH�r"OG cmnx"ermamm.Dr. mwavmm>Manuarn+umowa��nrrtvevma^uns.crvvamw•we°. Fl9IENS ISLAND ENi aISINC! BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SILT FENCE DETAILS xm m acv nano Nu 6 0 9 I �I 77771\1 a � mn..F,mddaA.�a euw RgRRi 1A1 14• ,R• g EE �3�1 :c �w4P: aurePa 4 ma-= .r _ ,RFaao,eaR a. i• ca�.A<im DETAIL"A" Z SECTION A-A DETAIL A TYPICAL v v, aFYYoase...n PLAN RAIL MOUNTING v iNYYu a a°mxeumB1prrn°m WITHOUT CURBING ®�®doi rya rtF^L ,.wuuexcaux,om f f Vp aYNuvNm nmaxmveuuw oO°.rwoama �� mwn,m vms u mxu¢,Ewxa YYvnwYrYuvwim marwnD 6,mE�cm,m Nr,iewuiYm vFou irntas�aiavapxY wv®uemu om�M,w�TV GTMwm, x •_ __ ___ c �___ end TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL(WATER) eao«o°rnna -----FF�les_—_— —_—__�� _— --__ :, tr ]' _ 1 1 TRENCHING S BACKFILLING I `r I c SE6Otir'a� L � e� JO0A1 � ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS STORMTECH SC-740 CHAMBER SYSTEMS ` I I •r i vena¢. MAIERW.LL.m DUCRITION A wo MATERIAL LOMPALIION(oENsm 11 LLASSIFIGTIONS REOIIIREMENT . ea�mawnww rdumxvrtune I I Ywm.wweNna lNe „clVdraaururoramna ew � Wuulrvel,v®umY , v dI�IDPVMEMFnidW.VmFgw® �rss�a�aatMvnw't sBYv[TNemnvnar ,mac w,erwrnvu¢tt PLAN w. ,aawmwawa n....°na-a.Y.eu.nrenvumaureamuYAmx •' "a _ 6 ,rera.draa+rrmnr`"YmEiY arvumoaeam.aar:w cwmro.m R�u�u anrnsw-'"iam METAL BEAM RAIL WITH MULTIPLE BLOCKOUTS TO AVOID UNDERGROUND OR LOW PROFILE OBSTRUCTION A N.� R mvarmr aew�umaoxwwnmrtav n rmmvmnon�¢ae®. �.�/°YmwrRr°a I-YT l al � d.dromoer rarmreaamume maiaY,ana,we.®wru.ommnwvawwu°ma^m��wrvmx:m� °j�,warK P�I��I SIN I11 A SECTION A-A SECTION B- y Y.rNNnn Y.NwNR a°-0 al Y TYPE^C-L^CATCH BASIN(PRIVATE) __ 1w w; NYiroa�R m.�NPrtY,arm �N�dwlet' NOTES• amw �w,E,l arYwNasrwvwimaa�rndnamm• ELEVATION TOP VIEW RIGHTSIDEVIEW FRONTVIEW invnaninnuwavmoniw PARTY A B(aav) H L ww, v wmW>ilaEver.EvwmwrtmuNraimer�dmamrna,uuwmmse,wmrtmnnwnraaormammaaT uaru Ye:�N.a.°,,..a.Y°YNRroa*YNa.,rrYNaYY�Y�.x+r �du�r�-^rra � � STORMTECH SC-740 DETAIL HDPE-FLARED END DETAIL em,P,Y..aeY.mmnY .-Y.�m�.Y�w METAL BEAM RAIL DETAIL(TYPE R-B 3S0) A w�rtnrY w aurae°eN-,rN „m nYYYNmNYY N w �.. Y O ANCHORa ENG EERINGS—CES G msenawrrY�n.n v,o.souw� cPROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS SECTION A-A ox w,Na PLAN PREParsED FOR — PISNERs Isw+D wAsiE nnNnGENENr Dlsmlcr RIPRAP SPLASH PAD PROPOSED STORMWATER BASIN DETAILS CROSS-SECTION A-A' r.ro Np°,�eY Na 7 of 9 cLE-Nunn vnnoow wrtx ooueiealNu°Nc vxnNDows P GERO STORAGE ROOM PRO— FlLE ROOM dw ERL�A�OR M � TO FlPST ROOp GS Ii,.„�F^:r��iLW� LLLi "P® _ BAFAN FOOM rA j�• F_ BlE-HUNG WDNDOWG EX pYING�RY�ORRSTOSEREMOVED BIEIO�O,. TO {MiGSI OF 4j W NUOwi NEw I-RION�TO M-HEX—NGVetE-NUNG PROPOSER ROUBIE NUNG WINDOWS SOUTH FACE OF BUILDING SECOND FLOOR PLAN REMOVE EXI.srINa DooRs RR oouat�xxuGNa I-E.scW.— oiFlce Isi¢ Hyl' :i:�e?4 •.� . µIv :,,)N '•fibs" ❑ cLNASPos vn�OowMG t •5• 'Wi1h� N' f '1 ROOM {i4�Nt`V 41� iY�y ;�) "C ''��yr•`�N �, y`"� µ�fTi$+�I�,' L bl .W�`�h v I"^ v ; A .i) ^ }�II-•ad p.y�;{-off 1PROMSED tt((�{{ yN� 'vRG y WLLEwAY n TRROPEOSED STABI GSELEAOING LAND_R E PXOPOD CONFER A' FL^ t�"" N't# �o-h r vY •'�H vY �'�-3 *.'!�'r F 'd! ESTHS OOM ROCM E 51M�L CE EXISTINGSINGLENNNG WIxOOws (II�TH�DOUDIE-NUNG WINDOWS YPIGL OF]) REMOVE EXISTING WPLLS PROPOSED DOUBLE-xUNG WINDOWS NORTH FACE OF BUILDING FIRST FLOOR PLAN !® ANCHOR PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS kLB PRmAREO FOR FISHERS SLA IN MANAGEMENT—RIOT EXISTING BUILDING MODIFICATIONS NV sGLer r rcr ZB Nn 8 RF 9 G01 P06TN¢AP0LGW¢N wNGww,P�rwN. ov¢nN¢wo 000n mPiu�OP PNN¢¢, ° s O --- �PNOPGSEG SNNFDGfl1 NMoortYSMMO¢ MwTENw�51oMGEMEA I I STOPwG¢OP UN�PNaCCE55Ew¢G MwTEniwL W I I � I I I I I I � I PLAN ANCHOR ��. ---------------------------- PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS NORTH ELEVATION Pis"�"��`AND-MNN-ENT01$TF1C PROPOSED MIXING BUILDING Nees MO 9 pO 9 APPENDIX B r IL Maintenance Building 1 a ' - ,. _ 'fir �. _ - .• s ---------- D01"i'ERTY ...... ..... >> 0, ;7 OUNT)) MON, if L.:: ",ONTRACTOR ip C� ISLAND �Y DEV/L1_L(`fA,7 11 Al N CY), FLOOD"ZION" Af, ................ T/ 70 C E N S id PROPOSED LEASE LINE ;, \ /� £ � \,x�\ �� .�yi �//,� � // \ r,r' 61(\ NIF TH"' 0X A NE\ P ESIDIEN(I-ES NIF F LO�VDZOIIIE: A 1 1 FLOOD20NE X UNION FREE <1 001, T� 4 #31,19 ................... Ills" ................. ........ 17SATf-LUTE '�(tFOUND) ILDINC, 'IT rrr B31 K E ENTAL R 170,60' ei, 'U4,"Z ,�Z v_ R "l"IVA -92.83' f =5 39'45'33" E 91�69' U f N � e4 T� T W, ME p �D % \ \ \ \ p" P V p( IN, \ " It !t; - 1, '1 `•.,. - I . 0, if ip "n Z� I Al ....... 21 ✓ .......... PAD "N 4 R. IAIrIcV ' EW N WALL A ---a/1 _b7z, if fGR; z IV U!V:T'�3 OF TIDAL gz� EXISTING PROPERTY LINE jJ \VA F r-LEC V V-. 1 1,49' 1 S�o SIGN Ij, 19 STOP � r� 26 1-iia, N .3'0 ',EJ � FEE ff C, Ift/V iX PROPOSED LEASE LINE `>AD 01 Ocl/ Ti�r /61� f Ub,'!:)Z'Dt'E AAF.'2 4 VN w Irl -Ire 4 r " \ "p Ar Act, tt c� F'LOOD1FOf1§E X Ff ry IKM I!N1 __j ...... .... STRU"'Ti E ry �..._'..� J -/ 1 f I r { { t ,i' t + i t , t, \ ~ X J:\013\32\Design\PLOT_Fishers Island Transfer Station dgn �!A )Xk f,V 41 Sequin Drive Glastonbury, CT 06033 NCHO Phone: (860)633-8770 Fax:(860)633-5971 ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. www.anchorengr.com I LANDS vo/" BY RICHARD CANIAVAN, PHD, ................... .......................... ..................... pws W Civil Engineering 0, Erw;,onmental(con5LI1tiI)g Land Surveying 0 Construction manaqee rr" nt PROJ.ENGINEER MJP 141F _-1 "1 \ \ � -Z�Z�:/ / / PROJ.MANAGER PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS MNB FLO,)OZ()NE A E, 0 OFFICE REVIEW MNB j j '/ f / , 1 `. r; {\ PREPARED FOR FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT If -/ - - REVISIONS 50 0 50 100, 5/ 17 7 PROPOSED LEASE LIMIT /24/1 WHISTLER AVENUE FISHERS ISLAND, NY SCALE: V= 50' PROJECT DATE SCALE: 1"=50' 013-32 11/8/16 SHEET NO. 1 OF 9 6�)- '� p�,' _)0"J / / 1\ ......� , ,� I /,�' ", 11 \,, --.. I \ / //,14 I I ,�, `-,"\ ". I ,I \ , 11!" I /I ____N1 I ,\, - , �I 11 I / ,,, „,�� %�N, k-__ 11 ,,,I �' I 11, ., \ , A \ , i,, ), < �, , , !�) 51 -- ,\ 4a , _�. \ \ ,, , f /_C'*��, ”' e___ ,,3 - , /--,\\\ _:X_// i-� - I _-1 -*-I- A 5 rA �, \ I I 1, I � y-%_11 ---- __ _\ -) V\i,,�,, / / / I \\\ I ? - ,_ -_ `:� 6 / � __ X'/- ,// " 1,/ 17��__ ___-I -- I__ ,,.'-; - --- ,,,,, i _ ._ //,/ I / I _c�- , .... Jp� 1001// ( - -1- . , , --.Z' ! '.)....9_7 , ___ � / ",/, / -__ I I I , ,� 1;1, 16 % V""I"'," 1, , \ \ �, f 4 " td I � I I ( ��2\ \ .. I \ \ \\ " V\\,\ \ -� / , / "I. - - (I- /) -",I/ ,"� , L�i �P'�/ "-- I 2 I \ " , 11k, (? - � 11 �� ,I , F-1 -1 / __ " 1�14 . - 11 I j 11 ,` / / / i y--"' I , _ , )\1 �_ \ I \ I-�, / ) / / ! If \ I I ....... __, - -�_- :. - __.:-- , I 0, -_ \ I I � i / % I I , I" I \ \ \ I \�\ I\\\\\ " __11;1� i -- ________.._,__ \ �/ GARAGEJNTO 1 " ,I \ I/ �_L,K ....... - - v - , " (�_ 5 \ \ �11 11 V 1\1 \ J, f &`_, �,c I/ __._4_.___ ] __� , , - - , 'u-1 \ I I IN\\,� 11, ,", I Ij",/ " , ' _ 1. // � / V I 4 ! I \ _,; kll � , '�\ \ 3 _ .., ,, \ , , - — - / %�, - - 111; _,- ., - A )-",o ,�"/, / ':--,:�, I I 1, , 1 \ \ , , , ,'. 1_ ____-------- ) " (� , I ,I- ) I i I , . \i I , 11 \ \ """,,Z.- — , I/ V 7- I I —A � I �k-I ,j s 'Z��."J, 1( ' I ; I / \ \ \ 11 , 1, . 1, , -1--l-, --.--, .-,, .-,,--"" / 1, / ,f rl.% I 1" : 11 I '!� -- . /II I , . \, \ \\ \ I L, . — ] 1� �,_�-- ", � f / i _e " , � 60 \ - . - , ___, \ i / .e __ . / a) , ......... ".., I .,- , A 11 1w / "I , � 6 �, 11117 _11—........ k . \ " o�"__-, C./f , ,\1 I ".. I , 1, \ If If /, \ \... \ \ Ift ,p , , " t ----- ------- IT ,\\ . / '\ - - " T / -1, \1 \ \ 1 __ , __ - / / IbA ','� ,,,- / i / On ;�11 i, I "' - -1.-, I ,,, 11 , I , I \ - e - \ \ 1-1-; � , I - ,,,P -,-, / . \ k I I _,, - - - -- -- -1 -- , ' 40 1\ . I I I f'!""'I""161,1 ( / I D", .e_,4`� 11 n\'A". �11 \ r)////I \, ," - ._ -_ .__if / , N ", 11 V - ; \\ \ \ I., d; A/ \ 'w" ,// ,, \ 000 1� \,O, \ 1A . a p Glastonbury,CT 06033 - I /\,,, I \ %* 000 A HO -, � \"' / / \ \ I t "I \ � / Phone: (860)633-8770 ^ I ,� ,/ - (V _ " I --, \ (� � _1 I __ / I , _/ , , I *_�, ___ � - / 1, I ,I\ �,i I _____ � / J., ,________1, 11 - - .1 It "' \\\\\\ \\ \ � lo I I 1- 17" — , __ - _�. ____.-,� A ____ I 01 _. -, _11___11 11 I . I ;� \ ,I � �, ZIP 7)) _._�Z, �")0\11,-'- I /� / — ,n;il - , 10 111 ,_ .. I , ;;;;; \ .......�(.�:, �� i", ,�14>�� I'll 11- . ,,,,, ,,,/,;,/,/ \\ \ , \ , � - ,V ,b� �_, (TYP> , 1, ,� � \ I , ') 4 01" /M - \ ) �� i 10- \ 11 ', I., _ 11 _- ,-- ,\, I \ , \, \ \ \ , I / /� /I "11111. 11... " I I /" %,I _T' :_ __ , , W, I A, I I . I t" -1, . J ,\ j \ \\ \ V , /I j4X)"'.,\/, \ , ()�-,\'\-, \ \ I / I ** " I _ f , - -;;_- /, �, I " 1� I I I j I� \ '.1 ,, �\\ \ -1- -----_- -I-11. -_-- __ 1, ' 1� I I T Yi �a� \ ". / � .", -X,�_'_ I' - J! \ J ,_ 1'f_�i, \ I % ,� \ 1� ," " �/ \ t>,�y __) \ 0. I / ) I /I 11_� \ 4.11-1 " , " -_ .- -", " "I -_ - I I i - I- \ , -_ - i 11 , �) ___ , ______ , ��"- -- -- , , I -, 77 -,— ,, ,/ , -, — —,_'_ 11/111-1/1, ", i - _ �) . I '1� - ....._ /�` /11" �,_-- .,.- /I - ___ - \ I ) - 7U-_-_ -I— \ \ ....... - -- , // ,,, :" / \ .I I \ \ \ I f/ " t, I; ,,�-:�e- ,-- .... .....)_"' _� __ ,�� I \ I/ '__�11_��,_\ 19 I - - ,< ... -_ -:�I- I vlk - ! I -('/'^_ -, \\ 1 \ \ � , I \ 11� �, I- ---..I---- _'T, \ \ I // PAD F� k-'W' OOD i " _�� j '._\ *, I I-i i - / " \ /, __-Z . , �_ ; �, \ ,r - I \ \\' " __ I /*-_,, , "-- /V GRI NDER/SH REDDER! 1\ ,,.I,-- V - 1'- ,__- \ 11 --------\ \ I i \ \ I % P / / I / \ 1\ i , - - __ ,_ I / k Ik;i:::::::��-- , , C14 / ,; ._ , ,'i - 7 __m,ft 7 I I / \ , ', 11 \ % 1, Z/ / / I t:�: _- - __-,-- .-.._.._ —_ ...I . 0"', ., I ) t 1/1 NP \ Q- li\,r 1-1 11 \ 11, ,% "IN . 1 \ __ I I/ \ N .,\ ", , I , �,) I . - \ _.--1_--.-1___ -/ I - � 11� I ,( , I ! \\ 1' \ \ A\ \, , *- -, / / / / , , ,\ i�_') ,�,) 41 , *___ ("P) I ___ ____O" .- -- �,(/( \ " \ \ \\,\ ,\ ��, -. , - / / (", _� I - / \_ ,,'7 L� , f I kDkSTRIAN"�UAR0--RAI� : I ^ , -1 e\ \ , \ I 10? /_, -14 / / ------— '�� _:111_, / 1_� , r , \\ 1, \ . --_ -, ___ -_ _ , ), ) F N C I T � , , I �\\ 1-1 1' \ *% I I, , I e / 0 ;, I " I I/ . '' I �J V, .11,- I . , ! ..', \ I \. 1\ __ , , -, i . \ I I , ?\ \ ___ � \1\1 ', , � � ,\ 11-1 __ .1 " ,., 11 \ 11 I / — , `_ f X / 11 , " '_ �; � I 0 4i / � ) , I ,�', \ ,-, " I I / N"' \ ,\, \ ,, 11111., ,, ,1, \ \\I 111.1-1 " I , i\ I I.", , _/ I*-%- ; 0 / / ,"'fl, - , \\ I Qr A� _\1 1/1 , yN i \ 1 ,1�1` \1 \ r / -1\ �_i � \ ,' ' I I 1\ , 11 \ 11� ', \ ;, , \ \ r ,�' rj I (�_) I 0 r// , i , J,��, '\ \ \ \ k/ 1p\�" I\ \,; i'<, ___--___ - ," S-, I'll, 11, \ \ \\ \�L,:: ,\ 11V/ // ,_N ( - : I I 1<;�r %\ \ \ \ / """ I I I \ / , \ \ , , '11�I "I, ", 0 L _ , BO N111-9, ; , / \\\ ___ n ,%, \ \ / \ r-\ \\1 -,I,, N I_]V /\ 11", 11, / .Z�--- ------ - ::_�--- I If r ) / _- \\\ __ _- ) \ / / \_) - \ XING 6UILDIdG \ 11 I T " _ .-.-. -_�>___ I/ ,- _()1�t- - _ _._., . I I I / - -, �1,N, I 11 / , O ., I " 0 , ,- ,.--.--],/ , I " PSHOP/661L)DING,< )O , " "-,., ,,� --/ t "'""' - 1\ � "O A .0 r, k" \N1, , ", , \ ", , \ -�Av - X-' _... �, I "", \ [::: —1 - , , \ \ I ED � - , I"0� , 11 \\ - - I -. ..... " \ .�� -�/�`X, / / "( 1/11-1 " \ , __ , I 111, I I , 'Ir/I/" — `��J I? ,- 1 ) I/ 11 "r.,* O I ' :, ----I—:...... \ \ I I �4 0�i Tp "—,\ —_ V�i -11, _ I — " I '1 \ \" \ - I / _ _1 " _____- . : � th �,O�, I " I " — 0 �)\ I I � \\ \ __ _' / / " .—I".1111........ I ";, ,"I' * - ___�_�� ; " ;_ 't I EXISTING PROPERTY LI,NE \ . \ , I MA'p-, 111. / , , ., 11 — - I - I _� \ I Civil Engineering Env::ronrnentall Consu;ting 0 Land Surveying 0 Construction Management 11 I , - I'll 14, <) I ^ . I . I I � , V ,,-) j i () I ) .1 I I I " I I 1, ,,, t-,J,I\ f �I I -i- %�, � 1 I I Y�, / � 'I,' ; 11 . I I I \ I I \ I / ,�r / 141 �-) �I 11 11 4- � 1 ;; I ,i /" /-_�., 1 ; 0 ;I I : 7 I�,_ I . "\ I'll, \ \ �� L,tL-,!�,-, " -_ )-), "k, � \ ( / I I I I ! ! I 11\\ \ \ � \ /I I IN'N \ , , � / I i ) I I , \ \ X( I 11 \I, J , r) \ "" I \ 1101,1v�_ I-' 1; 1 // I P , / V I , ! I \ - \ `..i. zz: I . I I/ i \ - I - — I I . I " / , \ ; / ) -1 I \ � , , I I ,,, "t" 0 1 ",i I \ "_,� � %� 10t"'p/t , iw/ 5 lm'- I j I ? // / I 11 , I , ,N�, " , ""W'�' � 11 ' , I I ,I'll-!,I 1*01, 10"t, 1111!;�& I I 11 , ;I I ,,,, \ — , I I ; "',nn/ / � ,�� , I j I _/ I \ \ _ \ k% ,-_ /�, ! , \ \ �, \ , i ) , /. I- `Z , I_ , Irlille" -.---- 11 i I 1pglm \ 1 , /I '? I / I� i \ , \ , \ 11 I " / \"c' \�, I , I , ,,< \ "I I ; I 1 /I I I I I � -,---- -- \ \\ C_ _� > � / / 11 � �'),-, ........ , I I i I I ,_ — I , %. , I , , I , *, j . / I I I I It , \ �.\',,-' \ , , \ \ \ , \ k,I"- I ,w I I I I _' ____ \\ , '? 4 5 �,3,3 - ,-- - '� " I f, \ t 11 � ""'�' _ � - \--i"4 I i 1 / -I " �) .....___ I / \ \q ." , f 1;f/r,,,.1r1___ 11 I / 1 1 / I i C / , /1 p \ i / , 1. ', "I'll \ \\\ 91 1 \ " , K 17 /. '�_ I j L("t) C, -,-"-,,- _--l�. , \ __,` , \ / - 6 a ' ", � , // I/,t1,1.,g ,'I" I N I I I / \ 11 . �1,'/11;,'1,1V1,,,1,�,,11� \ \ ,�_,,,,./., I / " " f, F/I - " I \ I I I 01 I i , ,,;,,I/ �7 I / , . ,/ I ),�, , 1.]; \ / / , \\ , % I A " I" "t, J1 ��- . � I , /""11 , ,- -�" __ ,/ , ,,,i"54A , / / / , \ \ \\ \1 I I / I I \ I \ i ; () / I I I 1\ I'll, I N \ "" I, � I I "I , � / / I �, I . I / / i I \ / / \ �'. r. "' " - \ \ / \ \\ Jf 1 \ //'11 ,,\\,1.\,\ I . t.- ,,,'/, 11 t" " 1' 1; 11 \\ i t I If � , \ / J /1 �1, I I", ,� � .1i �I , I I /111- `�'1 f , I \ 1\ / I /1� I I � \ \ \\, / / It T I � t, I I / I_ I , " I 11, \\ , " \ I 11 " I , ,\ ; . i , \ 1, 11 I / \ \ \ ,�� 1111,�11/_1111//.:... A, I , \ / � \ \ / 11 " -- I ') ! H " � � � . , I , ,,' / I / / / \ ,/ , I , I\ ��,,_ �/ I � � , I ---,,,, \ � I : I !C� , / \ \ \ \ \ \ 1� " / / / "I i""" I I ; , 1-11 'It, I / j i � "I 'I I 1 - , \ 1 Ir i : i 'i" 11 --_ _.........._- t \" � i / � \ \ \ "//\, , I" I \ /1�1 .... 11 I, � � � I, 'It \ "�>, � ; - I� /\ � ). \ 1\ \ 'I, \ / I- - I, ", I �//,,,1/,". I, it, " It \ I li'l J_i !1` \110A. , , " , ! \ , 0 \ " ,I/ II -" p . ,A) // \1 , , -A, I VI/ N \ ; // \ - - I 1/1", , - 1, � - 1, 1% \ \, \\, I \ / I/ \ f //�, \ \ \ I � , v, / I , � I ;� /�_, , � I, N! I / i ." ,� \ " � �, \ 11 . i -��',' -" I \ , , I , \ \ \\ \1, "`� -_� ',_� ,/_=_....._.____,__ __ //"/,�'�' ,\ \ ij � � I � T�e �� I*k � "I J� / J� \1"', /// \\ \ \. \ !'� \,�, I I " ... /% \ \ 1 1 tr��, ,/ ,ji / 11 . 11 � 11 "� "", \ ..... -1. __ ( I I I \ , \ � , I �' , \ ^ f \ i \ \ " \ \\\ �, \ � \ I \ cl I � I � I I I I/-"",/11 i,i A \ \ / j I \ , 11 "I "I',-, "" 11"�) -, � , 1� � *-T " ; k�, �; li , / �- \ I\ "I, I / /// \ \(� .1 I ,___,__, , I 11 I � ? ___,�1�1/1 \ \ \ , \1 \\\\ ``s `\ I t 11 I I k . , .` I , • \ \ - - ", � I \\, \\,( k I I I; I -j,1� / \ -,� -, ", \ \ \ 1,� / ), \ I I . I "� 1. , I '>_ ---- \, '\\ ",\\\% \ I i " , \ 1, i N\ \ - ...11 "" " ,� � 1 \ , i \ \ \\, _X , �, I/ \ \ \ \ k I , , \ � . _,� " \ -- I- \\\ I \\1 I "Ilt 'r. ,qf� , I \ \ \ 11 ,,i I ,,, ,_i,/v,,,,�, , , I \ I \ - A , 1 � I � 11 I , 11, �11'I,Q;''_� - \ \, \ I ,,� \ I : - �� I I, - i <� " /` -, \ \\\, I I I 1; : ,�,� , \ \ \N \ ). ( , \ /%I) / i *1" I I,j"f �J 4:--7--_ /... / � , \,,,�N,I,I, \" I i� ( i� � 0 / !� \ ( / � I " I, � ,I I r , .;I j \ \ _)_�) \ �� / i \1 ,/ , I-," i I, , \ \'11\ U '' � � � � I i / I,/ , Vt�" �� \1 X \ - '6�� , , \ ____..____._.____- - \ , I 1 1�,5";-"��,, _"�, / A, -) /_ . , - ,t k , _� - " ( " j i -, , \ I '11� C'/' �, / IT-" I/ ,__ __ ) \\\\I, �_\� �,X I," � � t, \ � I',- � I i I ( I, \' /111 \ " ,(j j I _/ I.- ,�_`, \ N\\" " ,, ,�\\\ \ N" 1; I I - I - -, 'I, - ", \� \\ I NZ . ��', \ r I I ,/,/ 1, , "I. / ", 'X',,�,, � I,\ , \ / - A0 A,ZN \ I " 6, _'/��,-1,5......11 )11�\ if .-,) \ � /� ,/ 1) E _ - i I I �1/" f, , ,(- ,/ I \ 11 " 9e, - _. . I i 1, k I . ; I I N I '%., - - /'`, ; I I � I . . I t "i I "?, ;'I/ "".111 \ .1I� - I,-,- I I i \ ",.,, 1. I \ \ I , , \ � I I I I I �i I iI _1 \, / i I � ,\"\\ \ I, 'y " 1\ , - -, \\ \ \ , " \ , , 1 / f 1� � I %'. i ; I\ I \ ., \ \ , \ , I ; , / - t, , / "." ,�". " \\ , f I ,�, ,,, 'I', \ "\ I . _ - I \ \\ \I, \ \ \ \ I ", " / ; I-, I—— -11 \ / _ •11 , - I I I I ,/ e - " I, I ! ! I i i 1, i"t, I I I I _- -- I- \ 11 .%,� - , \, \I,\\\ \ . . I,�, 11 ',�, - ---- I, \ I If . $ ," ,/ '0 I I," 'I . ,\ , 71J3, ," " - -I \\ \ 1, / \ / //,,,,, ,"-- %�,, , " \ \ \ \ \N j, i ! I )I i / IV "y I , 1: I , / I \ 'i ,� � \\ \ I, 1 1 i /I I / \1 I I I I �\ \"\\\\\\ \,,'Ii,\ I, r �1, - /I-- , \ I , " I It : 1 I o i 1 , Y 11 / "/ I .." ,, -I, \ 11 � i I I p t i " P I 1i ) \ " -,\ \ 'j, ; 11 - 1 q / r e � I \,� i , i , , ij 11 / I - I I," I , I, \ , I I _0 I, � \\ / ; - 11 \ \ \ \ " It I I I i 'I/ '1111111111111 .". ,1-_-4-I. 11-% / \ \ / I I \\\\\ \\\,*\\ , I I ! I I I ,i /./" I ", _; " I - __ "'o /' '/ \ I \\ ."'.�, __ \\ �� , , �/ It \\ \ \\ /� / , ", I \\I /I..". I, , It I l, � I, \"\�\ , I , I 1 1�,7111 - / ( 1 1 1 \ i I\/`,_�� / 11, ,- � � \ I, t : I �, � - - , I/ '� I / \ \ \ \ I f J, \ ti,`a :"�_O, -, ,/-, � 11�� "�, I \ \ ,( \ I ,, _zz / '1�` \\ \ , , , ,,, I \ \ I-, ,� / - - - , 1, \ \\\\ \ \ I \ , \ \ t I , " �_ I \ \ k \ \ -'- I - - \, i - , , / I , \ \1 "\ \"\ '' A I, 'k , \ ,- t I, I t I \ \ V I, , �_/_*�N i...)�, i a ♦ \ - _T - -�- ,>-', - I \',\, \,\ III , \ \ \, . _1� 4 \ It \ " I , I /.1 I-A D i 1( \ \ . 11 \ 0 \'��\, \ ) \ \ \\ , \ ! � 1 1 ! ! 1 1, , k - I \ I \ I \ / -, \ \ " I \ 11 , 11 \ I� , , " I, \ \ " I /'// \ , \ /��_ \ \_ A 1"\ I / , \ \. , \, / \ \ \ \ , / �, / / /I \ \% \ 1� �X , " , \ \ N,\ \ , \ --,)\' `[)E / ,\\\-\ \`/ I I \ \ \ \ ♦1. , At IN I" . , \ , \ \\\� , *,� \\ \:4 1 _,� �,� / , N I I .. I \\ \\\, \1, \"\ , I 't- �-,'.-- - - I I I/ - , I \ _____ ",\-I, _._-, ,__\ , � \ 1�-,\� \ \ V " : _, 1-11, Ij . \ / I . : I I � ; , , " i i \ 11 .1,_ , \ / " ,`1" - \ \ I I �/,%\\ / I I I 1, \ I N � ! , I , * , ,��_ , - -,- - 11 - \\ " ', � \ \ 1 \\ , \\ \\ ,',\ \\ \ , 't` �,;,-`2�' , -_.-, - , I 1, \ \, -&/ \ \ "\ - I I I , , .-�K'1� "' " ,,, ___ ,,, �_ ; \ i , I , \ , \ �i I - " V", \ \ t-L PIA-) 1 , \ ""t'.11, 0111 \ I-)0 r" �4\ N " \1 \ \ ! - - " , � \ i 'r \ .,-- / \ " I , : ! ; I , , _,�\ ,\� \ I \ *1 I W/",,/ k_ `" 11 . , "�� , ",,, -- 11 \ ",7\1'� . � I I I I . , It \ 1, \ , \ I I i , k,�, --♦, , .� , ,��,r. - \'I ��, \, \ \ \ I / ,\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \*�\\ \ \ V \ ,, .� \\ 1� " .. I ` , I I \ \ I, I �I \-.11 %\ \ \\ \ , \ - \ \ J11 I I \ , 11� I I" I , I N - " . \ i I /' \ \ , \ \\\"� \ \,\ \\ \\ I ,'��,,_�r"."J ,,,, _ I, ---- "-, .,.-I%,,"'\ , D 11 ,% \ \ \ \ I, . \. ,�,'\ \ \ \" \\ I, I 't, I I , I 1, \I,--,\ ,\.�, - ,':, I \\ IN 11 `I - , 'm , \ I I� ",� , - � ,,, 1 _., 'I \ � \ '11, �,� , I I \ \ \ It \ \ \ � \ I \ , ��\,"'I'll,,-I - 1�?�,),,_�_, �, 'e,��7*�, 1� I / I 1 Is \ \ \ f �, I, \ \ � \ \\ \ . , \\ , k , ., , 4 __1 f ) -� ,-,,,\ \ I i N \ I '�_% \ \ � \ I, I \ \ I I \ FLARED END OUTLET (HDPE) I -,I \ \ \ I .....111-4.... ) \ \ \\ \ \�,0 \ , , -1.....- "'- ,��,1-';�) _� \ \ \ . .--- I, I 11 \ "' ,. �, -- .,, , \\, \ ,�() 0\ - - 1 f I I I I, \ \ , I I ) \ \ \\ \ \ \ 11 I---- \ \\ \, \ \ \ \ I \ I%I "",, "., " , �,4 ` ," " - ,,, -",-\\\ \,�.\ I, f WITH RIPRAP SPLASH PAD, _� I, I � ,, , '� 4 ; � \ i I ) ; \ \ I IN 11 - -� e-,0'3:,,, \ ,-�.,, \ \ \ \ \ _ I 1 I .- 1_� . \ \ \ " I� ( ,�� \\ III, \ \ '1 \ \ ,,\ I. I 1, "j" , " - "-, \ , , , , �, "" ......-- �7--"-JL `%�,I,6 "I 1\ il I . I .. `,"I I .4 " � r-4 N -,--,tif,)r- �,\,,-,�-��,, I ♦ I," I , -%. /; -,--- -,----,.-..y,.,". I 1, I 11 11 ' II I I / I , � , I,�I \/ � i /,-I 1 ) /// 1, _ _ , k \ .- I ", ,-,`\ ,I, , - - 11-1-1,�,-, I \' 11-Y I \ O/ . \ 1 7 11 Ili ; ...'. . . I . t,_ / I 1�1 1_� A � I � . (,/ \ - \ I t I ""N ,\ " ,\ - - _� ">-' %, 11 I I , 11�� _-,_,,,_�", It 1. " \ I - / I ! •� ; i/ , _�_, - ,It , I , � "" _ -, -, \\\ \�', "", / --I�_\\ \\\ I / / \ ______ \ \ \ � �l '\ I I I I I . I ""I � , "... 1��- U,.�11--, I 11,/ V \ -7 , 11 1-1-_- �_ ,� 7 -;� , I . �111 I. I .j7" j - I.N11% ,I I'-, 1 ...� 11 " I � .- __�-, \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\� I N � -,,,-- 1 rN.- - - \ \ \ I �19\� / INV.=10.0 - p " \ I I - ", " , N 1, I -_� \ , I . IN ,�,,� �...:- , - \\ " ------- I I I \ i /), \ I 11 ,,\\\ \ , \ I I, \ I 11 ,0,wr I I I ,0 �-,",', ,.,y _ , � \ \\* \ , \ I- 11 �, N<, - - I_jz I -\ \ \ , i , I " , ,f_-�,-� �;� \ I \ ; ! " \ , I , " 1, `/ , \ \ , \ I, \ \ , -- / X \ I I 1" \ -,,� - .')t . \ \ \ ; I I , , , I/ \ 2�,.� . " , / . ,,, / /,( \ \ \ \ \\ \ \� I /,? t It I 1! / I I --l-l"", � \ \,\,-I, -- ,� " , I�(�, � , �.//,,) S�\, / � z //� \,", ,% / I ; I I .1 \ \ I /" 'Y'\ I \ I \ / I i I S \ p", r, .1, I -- - , \ \ \ . I \ "`.i. 1. \ I \ " " I, I, i // - 1% , 4._ � .... ... t _�,. \ " \" %�,,"_-" \ \ r_1--- , , -i I A \ \ �N U11 -_-1 ,- -�, \ I / \ \ \ I "I �� \ , " __� .- � � _� / \ / `�;-t,S /, \ " " " , I \ \ / , I I \ \�,�, \ \ \ \ I I 1, \\ i \ \\ 11, , - , � \ : \ I , /I � i I �) -\)�\ I, I V 1-1 I i � I � / e " III I I I __ I / \ \ \ \_ "''T ��: _...."I , 1� I I , " " �, , /\\ , "." \ \ \ \ ��, , �f� � __ � 1, I , I \ . __ i . : r , 4 - \ I � --- I I f \ \\ - -.-- \ \ \ \ \\ I I It � / I/ \ .- -.1'.."...'__141", - , , 16- N1 .1q , \ i ') 0� ,�S`E_ I 1 ! \ \1\�, \ \I, \\ \\ ,�\ 1 1 i I \\ ,( \�\I, \ " I - I ,\\\� //<,\ />�,\ f \ 11 -0-1 - - - I . I - - , I I \ f \,-\, ,�,, \ It , %,�,,� -,I--.-.,- I . I ; -7- - i t ! \_*I I, I I, \ \ ; � 1D'dR!Gii60ND CONCRETE 1,� // /I, I \ - -. I --I'-- C, , - - _ , \,�, , 11 6 I- f � � �, - / � , \ I C \ \ I � \ -__"'_ "" __ - "" I . / - - I � I, - - Ir''4`\ / \\ i I . 1--)4 -1 \ \ \ � _11\ , , 1 , , , \ / \ \ _�! I \ \ \1 \ t : I \ /I 11\ \ - -1. -- c `6- " , - , I, \ / _", 11 \ \1 \ \ I - , "....- ,>\/, ,,�, �V. f , L_f \, ,N/ � — — — --,�/, 1 \ I , - -, ,-51,--- .....- I-- \ I , � % i__� \ " .�\ ",_,", —, .. ....-- '"' -_-_I (, ,��,I` - - - I \\ e_ 11 \ \ _\11 I \, \ -, \ 111%, , _�.- .- N" \ 5 , .\ N � \ ,- - I _ " 11, \ \ / \\ � : -------- - ..RAP, I � \ \ , \ \ _/ \\1, 1, \ I :� , "' / I---- - \ t CEILING OF , // f fr ,\ . , -, 17-�, �/ , STRVC TO,Bk DEMOLISHED.. , \ , \ , , , k, \\ I - - - ",,&yW,jt, f, t \ ,V I \ \\\\\\�-_, )� \\\ "I ,� ) \ 1\\- -.,- � ,"": I / j5-4tt,�K, �, 11TURO \ ,I 1- \ - / / / I, TO�gE BACK FILLED, , (/,, - __��'. I .. _ � 6 1 .- V " """, 1 \ \, � ,I 01 i1TI4,SOIL A i 1 \\ I \ \ , I \ �: 0 1 ___ , \ \ I 0 A� I -_ I /___,__j � . \ I , I 1 % , � \ "., J�_i r-- .-, I, \1 \ N I I ` V ,�.-___ \ ------- I � �� /X .- -- \\ I/ - - I.- .� " 11 \ I I , I ! _ ( _ \ -,�,,, 1, \\ %__i \ ) \ ---__ - �, -- , ---� �_, - -_ , Z:f - _. .� ��,. I, I i \ \\\, 11 "-( _ _ \ 1 11 - ,,X, / \ ___ ": - PILL WAY N„'" \ I � \ \ \ 1 3 � --" \ - I I, - \ \N / \ --- ,.--j ,"', � " \\ \ \ f COMPACTED. '� I iL I �I i I .'I___ _/� .. , \ , ,I-I \ \ / I . t� , I I I, \ \ T_ I, I \\\ - _ f i r, , `\ ; //v I , .. I __ \ , o, 4, 3 \ \ " f II' j,, " I -JA/ 1\ __- __ c " "_ "y _/ - /___._-- � - I f \ " \ \ I III , .- .- - ', \ 11 ,__...:�7\--------- , \ It I I SA" I / r I , �_ ____ \ \ \, co, \\ I, \ I I \ \ \ — " / � I,,, \ \ t \ I I N ! j '),,`i,- I -1 I `.I, \ 1, 11 ; - ill Ii. ........ " /-"- 1\"_I I 1,- I �I, \ " , , ,�, -, I, \'\\ I 1, \ - , , / , \ \ , , - I ", \\ \ \ ., \ i I I I \ \ \ \ \� \ , I i , ' ; , \ 11 _F___ 11 - , I �� ,�,I \\ ", \ I, \ 11 I I 1� ' ' 1' \, \ NA' 1___ / I - . 1 . I � I/ 11 . , 11 --- , \ \ \\ \/ i` I /, I _ _,�/, I "" , .I, '11� " � , , 11 , \ III\ \ ( \ " \ I It � \ \ , ' I , .1 I, ) : - - - , I \ 0 11 I, \ I I ,\ - - - \ tI, 1, ♦ , �, I I \ I I 11 - , ,,, /I _�11 _ __� -1 _ " "-- , -_, I I - \ .:. ....... , , --!!7 / , "k ,,.,-- , q 10, ' \ -, I, \ \ \. - _/ / , \ �. 7......., , \ - I I I I I \ I \ � . 1, "- *-- , I , 11� � � III', � \ - - /`1`1 \ I, I I \ ,\-,\ \ 11 , I, \ - % / � I \ \ I / / 22 \ 1� \ \ / I - \ 1A \ ;:� Y '� , ,I,, \ \1 \,I 1, \ \ , �\ T1 — / ,'- 11 I � 11� _ - - I:.,- � ,_ I - " �_9 I. I I\ I ----;-"-I � , \ I //1 -,"\ t � , ,a ,.\ `^- - ,". --"- - " -,,_,:` � 1, ( __ ',_11V1- "I'll \ \ .\ 1, ' ,I , \ _-, I \ \ \ ,,,- ,-,�, ,,, - " . \ ) \ I /1� ,\, '� I \ 11 I \ I _� \ \\ \" 1, ..,..I-- ___- �1 _-67, I I 11- I ,,, \�..... "I'll/,, I, ''I \ I I I \ \t," / I __ __, I IN, - I 11� ....... \ \ - 111',, . I I � . "-, \�� \ I I I,7. 11", 11"'I\ _ " \ ,\, 6I 11,I , , I --- - -_��\ I 11� I-. - -- 11 I I IN I I le 11 -", -" ,\, X --�_\ IN ,NI I, I, I/ - __ — ___ - ,7 " I - ", I i / I '\ v -,--I \U It-,,"-% _1% 11, 111-1 ./ ., � __� _- _� " "I r I i ... \� , - \ \ - I ell, ,_ \ 11� i '11111".., . I.I, ___ A, " 11 / t 1111111111'� I, �,, __A'� � ,'� \�_ K I I \\ 1\ I " 11 , / AY ,� ,I, . I---- ____ - - \ " I , j.::, i - ,.\.,,,,, " `I,�, '__1 ---.., 1� I \ \ %,,, - .0 ,,,N, If"I 1, / I -I--� ; / (" \ "I I r \ I I / L. `1111__ ... � I I it\ \ \ I !� � \ \ , \ \'I " , \ "'�,\ , -_ \ \ , - - __- , , (,/ I I I\ �,,, N , " ` I 11 . I ,,�, I, I I \, \_-, I- - __- ,I 20 , , \\ ♦" I Y)''\l , / I\ - - \N \ 1� � ,\_ I \ I \ , ., I , \ .�_ , I \ -, -,----,, ; \ : 1, \ It, \ II � "I 111-- ------- \�� \ I \ \ -- \♦I, 1\ ,, " -,---I-------- \ \ I , \ ,I 4 t It, , \, .,, ,� _;.�.... Z / _ " , .I--, �_ ___ __ --------- r__ ".� , / I , \\ , \ I I/ I � bc \ \ I ,!\,�_ i � I ) t I \ , -_ " I I,/ ...1-11,11' �. \ MAIN "I I V, ( � 1, , ------- � r I i: I -,\ \ -%�,\ I 1\ '\-" I v ,� - , I / ,I" , 1, - \t, '.I, \ " " I I ------- ' ,I, I \\ 1 4 \ _ " 'i I ---- ' �,-.I'n, 1, 11�1 ,\ -\_ _� / 1 - \,. \ , I................... 'I\, r \1. %, ., I ,,,." 7 I //", 1�1_z - __ ,I c-, __ ---------___--- " 1, t BUILDING' , , � , , , I \ . cy" 1 f� \ \ \ 1--,_".., , 0 , I _J�r_ _____----------___.___,___,.__ R, " \ , X .1 \ \ , , I I \ ,� i , , \ \ "\ . 7.3% \ \\ \ �� I � I 1� \ \ - I -,_ 18.2+ , 46' x 60 � 11 11 i -1 ,--- I - - - \ I, - _1-_,1 . j ". �I -, I // - I ______ I I I' ; I \\ - \ "I -11, N, I,,�.I I ___ t / -1-1 -_ _ \ \I I. \ . �, I I, \ \ \ -I,- .-- � \ /I IL \ _� I 11� " \ ........* �/ _,_ I I, , �\,\ , , , ,� , I, \ 1, \ )",Tle I "I 1, - 1-1 /FF=18.3 --,� ,,,, It I . �,VYII \ 1j 'I- - I - - J� \ \ .... % I., � 1, 1 (`6.......� I \\ ". I,,,I Z" Nli � -------- - , I 11, . ,) I-, / I I 1� /�!•'.,J �� 41 ��-—------------- _-, I\'\11\'t, "/' ',, \ � \ __\ " -- " , ____ _1\1_)I \ ___,__ \1\1 .P_� I � \ \ I, ,/ I __ I -1.4%1 ; �- -,-,,, - I _-, I - - 1, , I � �\ .1.7� \ I 11 I 11,I ,��-, I I I � , i \ ,\ \ \ 11 N 11 .11, .,,� I;. I _ -----, /� '�11< 0 I , . N�I -_ _"______,'__._: — , , - \ -_ - - / , , �yl I , 41-111-..----.,-.�-1-1---,-*'-"—'--^---""'""--"', ___, .� I I. " I �� .- "I ) \ \ \ \ /' - I .. '-,-.- _.'--.__ I ,--__ / I'll, ,-,i k , \ �......__-_____ __...._.____....._I-__'"'_„_„_--_1111.".__ --- ;;�, I � I \ \,pl, \ t . �r \ I - ,/, / '11, 1, ,I,- . Ovv ,".1111-1--, \ "I \ , �'.� \ o ., 1\ ,16 �. _. _ _A___.___ I �� I'll ,� ,� 11 \ "I, \ \ \1 p -Z L - -1 I " /I .- !, il I,I \\ , --- -, \_ -,-- 'e,' .1 - I. \ ��,_' �?�� -Z5- - \ 1-1 � - -�,� 4, \\' � ,,," , \ '11�,-�, - -.....�,, It 11 I f X,4�1' - - - _ , - .,�, I '\\ ,�/ "--,1, I IN, - !I I\/t, -- I 1, - ,.,`,,S� I ' 1,,I�. V \ I � I I" \ \ \ \ , �� e g" - - I -.1 / ; � \ � I i I 'j rz�!4TJ /� - I __ - /// , / + 4, ____ / I I I \ , '\ ,.t I / o %` - -- .....- '&_7 - k ,V; ,11 , "IN,, , I I \ lel_�, I I I -_-Z--'- ,.�� '.1.11.1 'I- , ,;�t, ; I \\ ,it I-,- ____I .I _- I............___7 C -.-/AV/--./ / � " \ - 7� \ ( ) \ ( \ i 1_.__1_--__._ I�, I "" I, ,, \ \ ;i�-. ____" - __�� I I // 1/ '-, I \ P AV L D 1 _:ti ) ./ , 41 ,/0'-, y \ \ \ I " . \ I \ \ �("�,3'.' 1 % '-�'- - , - ,_.♦ �� I V, ".�, /I ','��,; i I I /-1 ��, 0 "I - , /I ,/ 'I' ! ,,- ,,� \ '4t \ \ __� I - � 1�, " , / I / f-- I I N i IN .. -,_ \ � \ \ I \ I - ,- '. _",.,-�,,,,,,� I, I, V I i t I f7--, . ,\1 I 1 N,,._2 -_- -,-_- '\\ r-,,,t I \ \ I� - " - I- _. / ,I? r- f 11""i N I I �_ 1 -,, , I 1 7 \ I \ I , f\ i V It // 11 I ,I I I\ .\\ \ I _\ \It \ \ It \ ..If.* \\ .�, ---- -, - I \\ / )- -:-_-,- 1 .. , f \1 1 Na 4.;) _;11.111 I\ / -,,�"-,-,,,--,-�--,-,-1.1, I I __-,11 I / I - 11 �j�\ I \ I / I - I \ 1\ \ ,, \, \ \.\ 6 I, - ,:Z��-� --,-%,.�- --�_ - 1B 5 ,�,( -- , ,; ---, I A//L:--7-f-- " 11 ... I \ \ / \ . I ## -_ I'll ') , 1 / 11 .01 __..,", �NI - � \ V , \ \ \ \ I I .0 /"' I� \ _%��_- * + / /I \ /I 11 I � :� 'I - \ \ / 11 � , "//`/' � \ -"�'11_�) \ � I I --,?/ ---I, 1� 1/1R111 �1 I I ItI, \\ \ '\1 \ \\\ 'IN/_1 \ ` / \\ I, I I /!//,�_/ � �\ PAR D - ', I , Pit - k ,� �,-- 11 ,,,I -VP"- ? - #0 p I \ / ,- / / I I , , -_, \ ,, 1; 11 11 -------� It 11�1 - , ----,-- i \ 11 I I 11 IJ I . I , /-,/ I i i ;111' / 1'�31-- ,� 1z I "I - - \ Ilk \ \ . , . . ; I/ -;,,,,�,� -) \ - I 01 ) 1, , / , / '11-1/1-I, I/ . � , I I I, \ - ; - '(11 1 40 pw" -\ - -- - 'J�4,1 / , L_ V11/11� . I I "'" I �-,) \ \ X'�111 I -_____. -� "I's, I \ I � _/ / / __ -- �, , I \ \ N\ b , \ --- `\ ) /11 .. .* , 01t - �_��--�� / I I �,) N I I , I. .- -_ -- ,(,; I . \ , -- I - __" 1 .7 1 '/k , ' "' I / .11 1' \J, %\ III . \ \ i i F I 4* / .'� " V - -, U / , -, " 15 - - -- " \ - 1� ✓". 111....� \ \ , ,I I r � , ,,-, 1 ,; - _�_,) I - / �-, - I i \ \ I I, - " , , I i It �\ \ "oil� � \ 1 7, / /` \, � � - .",\I-----j )116 - \) \ \ , \ 0 ., \ , , 5�.__ .-_- �:7 ; STO?�m,l;i i �'S,T��R�Ml� TE 11 / , �, 10 � I I � , , 4, n 1, ...- Y, "I 11_.1/ i I \ - \ , , / , I � / \ , \ \ I, "/. -\ \ I � I \ � -S, / / .* ', \ \ ' �", "'I" I- ,/ I / - ,I , N, \\ , 1, � __�i,'Z6 � / I I% 1, � \ / . / I I " TREAT,,M_NT I I I \ I � \I I !/ r� -- :, - - � \\ - `!:� ........F ) � �,, / / , / 11 _�.,I - .-\ k , I IF I �� I I 1'�, %I V, , ------:�' _,I.� ") ) 'I \ \ \1 It \ - _ , /�-/-,,�,, , �\ , I � "'I - I p ,ol / 1)/ /" I, MODEL STC 450i �51`-, / *11�,,_ , ,\I \ - \1 / , I( __ � , � - " ,--- ,� -I� ,4. I'll 1. N - , / � 4____ - %`1. -,". ,� . 0.\ \ \ - \ , - - I -," \ / / \ .)') \ \ \ \ \ I I / .7 % i 1-i:...... _1-__--_-��\ I,�.'I . - � - ,I" _J, - r-I ; \ \ . \ 1 11 +4 "*11"_\�e1 _-,- _," , / ` T.P.:A6 �"_I, It _D � - j '' I / ,-. � /I \ \\ \ VD\ \ `\\,\,\ \\ \ \ � I \ �f A. i // / 11 ##.* \ �_ / \\"/ \ \\ \ , % \ \ \ I , t I I . \ -.". \ I -,- I , � / / ,_ \ \ \ � i � �/ -1 , -, I ----I—' I I , ", I -_ , �_)/b f I / I I I f i , \ \ � , , I 11 \ , " " \ , - \ '3 ) r\, I . I 1, / , , , - 11, I /I I/ , I/ ,,/ I - "I'll, " "I / i'' i cl \ , /___ \ ,& ," ,�, \ \, \ k .. \ \ / -ii INV�'=_11.4 ��, C-) \ _? 1__� /'/ - -111.1.,. 1, 11, I, .\ I . " -.1 I..... )j',--I, , '� I ,, / , \ \�, " / k / 'I_<11 - .. \\ / A�17 I �\, \1 I / % \ , , , - . "I.,. . t '/ - -"---- ., I � \1 / / I \ % . \ \ ') I /I I I \ \ �, I I f % 1� I , _ � '--, CB 163\ 'I / r, - COC( 'N / / Z, \ \ It I - , V ��.::7 1 ' 1, '011 -, \ \ I ., � \ - j " I ,,;, O/ \ , . . .- 11 11 \ /It- - I _ � 11 �r 1% ,\ \ \ \ I I �I j )NVFfZT EXISTING ' i� - .1 _�z / "/ , I .it % mv 1, \ / - ' I I _ I __ . \ , � I I, I'll. ; T " " � "I -1 11 71r ,//I . i__ :_.,_.,> I - � 11 � `15' I / 1� ,/ ,�;, - \ \ _ - � TI; i I/ / I � V-- .;.� -% \ - I \, ** ", I \ % 40\ - .- I I ", - , -. " . I I/ I \ 11 f �/! W. 1�. "",\ 1, %:- , I ; " / I 11�) 1 � "'. 1, \ - ." � I CE 14DPE , /, I \ / Z7 7 L7 A / , \ 1, 1, � I I % I%., , \ + 'I', � I, I, *'- ____ L__ , , I; / , C' /1 / / .., -- > . \ I % +,, \ - . I S=7:0 i I ,,�% .1 ,,�-,� 11 _211 I. � ." , ,,,, (,,,, f, I I I . I,_, ,,,//' / ,- ,�,e I I-I \, / , / � , -- I 1, too, I N \ \1� T__ \ \, 40 1/\I. \ I , 11 I "�-IFF=16.94V I I - I I 11, /? �/ I,/ L - - , '_'-',--MEETWd'�S,PA \ , j \r, I � ........ GAIRAGE INTO _ I20' \ \ '6 __ , I / � "/ - 1� 1/� ,/ , , ,F.=18. -, - - I N I , - 010 <... 11g,s V , , I. ,,_ I 1 � \ \ \ INV.-14b � �/ I ,/1�e \� - + I-I, � I 0�/- I f � I I// ,�, ✓e 1. ", i-, - L_j t A- 1�,-, ._,X, I 1, " 11 I \ ,,�, "", III \ \ __11 \ - ; ,,, / _ ,,. 77_& ... - I ___ - '-1111 "I\ ,, \ � \\ \. r_1 % I_ \ _i(,I '10 1� I,� � I I. 11 �(-1_ / . I \ I in�,Ia,�1, , , �, NI 2 . I " , -1....... N 110 1 , -,, I - -1 \ / i I , --1 - . I \ I"'I I 1-11',-, I,------ ___ I I/ I / f \ __ I . ",.�-, ! .1 '.11 /- -15" HDPE "'I, I \ ,*,�, 16 � I / \ - - 1, � -- '.* N\ I 1, /T , %I -_ 11 " 1/,I -lee � 11 I f V\ , , , %_. z t I ",,, \ I ".- - �� x \%, � , t I \ \ ,.\. I \ , #I � ",II "" 1-i --___-.--_-__ 1 4 - / /// / / I ING BUILDING . I \\ \ 1%, ,�-.- 1.01, f � - -, i��n A� __-, �,41 .///,,/' ,/ - , .. I // " "�\ I r i., . _ _ ,___/ / 1� // I I - tt�t, , , // ,�� --, - I r I . �\ S= �� 11 I I f", - 0',--- ,e I , ,/ ,/ , I soy X 00 11 \ 40 >I, iIt7-.,-I, A., 4.0% ;/ . CB 100" I I ,,I I. ,,, " T11' �i �/I// 11 '� ". I \ \ I // ,\ V % -1, �/, /_1 "Ir'l 1�. I/ . ..... _`,,�`,4�,_ �- / 11 " // / �_mz_ _ / T.F.T.F.=115�2 Z , ,;�,/ , - I "I � V_ V-,, ,/ _ - I - ", '/ I4- -"�f I I 11 ,;�/ o. , - 1-1 � -`._."_._w - I � I NV.=11.5 I \ ) 11 < 11, lk� ,//, / I \ It I 111�\ / I* 11 I/ � \ 11 I e `W ti', - - I 1`1� 11 � 1% V - / " _� I � I I / I I 4*4 \ 11y. I I I I I ��.�,,,// L - - - - , �, 1# I I . _ / /I It� / I, , -_ - "I 11 1 "\ %�� / �1, , I 'I,I ,", *1 \ 'Wj /� - 5=4.374� `<� \ I A -�,_,I I - 'k , I-, I �_ _- �, " 1, , , I - I , , '�' k, �;: ,\Eql. \ 1. \% illl .*- 1 27. ♦ -% 11-1// -, I - ' ' 1,11, 1� \/ - _o \ I FF=27 0 --I 11 I \\, - , - \ \N* % // 1-1, .11), 1��45"!/ I .* / \ //'I �. _HDPE , I //I�" I- - __ , \ .- I 1, . \_ �.... \ \ %O ",,If_1_,Q / 1I./ '__1' I I / I � . - I _' /k 0� I CB 101 / C) % _,AI , It I \ \ 1-1 � X �� / % � _— I " � ( \k \ \ - '" � � , -,-,- \ ♦% -------I, ,� - T.F.=16Z 1. f_/ I ( I'll 11-1 cr,- .- 11 I / N - 11� -, I/ --, " � 4k.r7_1 - _'Ie \, %, , - \ \ / -__"" "' _- -- ______�' , " 11 1, \ \ -\I \ / "11 �,t� - ...4 F /-I lc�/, . - - / 11% I i \ \ \ - , I'll- - - �- 40p� %J1 � I I / N r,-- - , / S FOP .00' U I % I , , I \ A ,- �� - , -, \\ \ \\ -, �) '_1 I I I / I - \ k ", \ ____ _1.��11., ,-,- � \ I % ", 12 1 1 � - - - I " I 7 , I - -I -) ", .- I % , � - / 101- I \\ " \ "--__,,.----_ "" ,I- -- 11 "I I\ 11, '\\, . () I'-_!" - 11 -1 0- X,, ".1 I � \\ 11 I .- . ! \0' , , I \ 27. I'll/ 2, 4 , i, "� \ �'Ili if-, . / _-11 -1, .1- \ \ I I I I \ - f , I/' ___ , _� 1� / / �� I I , I 11""r , ,1 11 11 ; \ -_ _____ ----, / --" , .— '108 -_ -e� \ 1. f -f , / � I \1 I \\\ \\ ,--/ 11...........�... ........� -------�.....11-1.... ...........�-- "I I 111, 1� � I A.F.=16.7 \ //16'-15" I—- \ I - / .1, � O I \ . it It I - � ... 0"fI - - I, I ; "I I \ , � I 1--___� __111.1 / I , *111, i I -, -)() - I,78 .- I ', "�\ ,� __ J-11I, _ � I. \ I I \� -1 -- ' 0_0 - ,/ 1 102 1, - , i- -------- / / I S/CN \\ ) �_, \ \ .- \111/ -, * . , """" _111110\_.---- N �p VC -----___VEM/1 ,1 f,�, \ --- 4� , I �, "I - I � _ \1 — — -_ I I ...1-1....� o - � I I � , I -1 11 -- \ I �......__ 1�1_1::, - ,I, ,,@,,0.1'��j . I 1 4p \.,. , *11� e,J_ 1�- R INV.=13. ' _.__.___ HDPE�,'� I / 'I" "-1 \ I� `�_ , I, I- IN, i (I I- , - '6o / i ___-_--I *'*- I I f , � \ \�\ \ � 'IL; ..4 - - I I I / ___ 1 \ 3�-fY,�, / '�.'� N, - I N, � � 1 '\ , I" , ., --. - - - 1. 11 ; I I / 1�4` , I _ , __ - , f I , 0 �---11,� Ili, ........ =0.6iko � \, -"��____ ............ /� ) 0 I �) �" I-) I ( / ,I I-_ / / 11 \ 'i , --,(. ,,-) Q, : 1 _4�_ � , - t / I -.I----- _ I \ / \ , 1'\ I I i, ., %_� --"\-, T/A,,I,,.,, � I, . � Iii--�;_ - 0 V "-- - I I "/ - . � // , 1,I I ",_ \ \ %�\ I ; 1) [,:-,%. " ,II 1, ; 1, I' / C)C/11 \ \ / " _,�.l I 11 I 'JI I X I ! \ " (",\ - - .__0 1/ / .#.* )r , ...... - - y � R , " f \ / \ 1__� ,0 � - �b __ / / ,�_ -*, I I 4v"t, , 0 1 .01-1 I-'s.- .1 .-- / I/ ,� - -, "I � ,__ 01 /I . " I, � 11 - N<1 '.\ /_ 11- � \ I I t_ /`LJ .#.0 %- - - - `_II I , I - i I - - I\ ,� - 1" I I -- ,,, I T�l _ - / -, -___ : DETAIL: SHEET FOR STd`RMWATER ��, I / Im ,/ - \ \ .01 I\ I \ / , -�, , ,_ - // \ _ / ;rm.=�.t.o - , It\ IXO " I I .*1 27 . - I ______ / �",' " ,� / � , , . ^ 4# - .I-, . , D --7-Z,'_Z ,�� - I " ;IN CROSS-SECTION , -_> I I I � \ i / .# I/ .." , , - , __ �. I - \ B.V,"=/214.0 \ ->" \ ## % 41 , , / - , \ , �, � \I, \I \ �, � / e.0 I .. -, -I / - __ - - e � / ," k N \ %w 40 I I ---_-_ I I / \ I I . , 0 .1 r i_:�� , : /)CO Y "I \ (-C I / � /' -, \ V'>) / ( (///, \\ / I, \ I \. 1'\ \ 27 � I .. % /ol -_ I-,", ' / , \ %�> , _ \ \ \ t . - 1_� .- I -, / // \ // 1, em,^;?,�,,,/ k / \� , \ t 1� � � -1, I �,. #4 18. 1 . - 1� , / I�,`,'�,t - - , \ \I #0 z 1_�"---,,,I - t:��_ - - IV-S, ./ I � / " .. - 11 11 \ "Il ,\\ /,\ . - ",-I, *1_1 I , .1 ,,,�-,' 0 .0 ", It / - - W., 1, 411 -)� I" /ISI - - N_ ,I.I / \\ / / , — — __� / ,� I \ " X I 11 / , - 1, 7 - 11 I // e ,4�.I \ 11`1�1� ) I I ,i.; 1". / , , "I �I / I /�� / , ,� , � -__I'll �/& ii 4', , \ \ I I ,/" \ " \-a- --_-- \ I \ 1, � / -I.- , � 1_- " "\ I �"\,, /- i N � "11 i / _-�....�.- -, ,, j . __1/ / \ /I "'� - \ - ! � - '-t-- ' - "- - ., " I 10 ;1 � I ,'I / _" / �� \ ,26.8 \\ \�-O� " , , 'r......��"11 / N - " ___ / I/...................._.- , 1, \ 11 11-1 __-, I--,-�� 11 �l 11-.. I --, / \ P_ / __ __ / 11 11� , I \ I \\ " 1\i�I 1 � 141)�, - , 11 _ , I N \1 'III I - 'T -1 1____"'_1 / --- - �/ i % I i I , " / / / / , 11 \ I \ , \\\ // I \ I 1 / \ , ) 11 / / I--1 i! / , k ""' - \ / (r�,, / - / 'I" _11- I/1 I (/ , "I \\ I / -_ / \ 0 / // /f/? I-, I _4 i I �; I I i _�. 11 -_ -_ """I, . � I'll ,/- -_�,I-', I, i ) / /, // /I '-' .o, I lf�j I f I, ,-.-, -_ I ,_ `11 / I V/ ( il r - I /�/-)__ __ - "I " I II116'z I _�' '� - / / ,� / ee / / , i �NC,f, -- .� 11 \ _,` / _,V I /�,,��, ,p'Q;%?,,',p, , I \ , -- 272 I I I_ / ,� \ - '0, I--,' -_ /-, I / \ �-- , _\_\ /,,�I\ / I , ,I ----,-.--/ " \ \ ��, ,- - " // , ^�k, , . = \ _ \ / I j� // / I , ' - - I *�11 \ � � \ -_ - I " - r / �l I /A Vill /I"i _/ -�_ __ I - ' i -,_ I, I__..._.._"�' _., I � /A � ,� I / -(r /, -Z- GX� � : til ! \ �_ -1 \ / / ((r ( 11 , I I / /I /I I - /-B.W.= 214 1 1 J <1 I /, II11�11 � ,....._____ -7? 1 /I /11 , , �_, I I 4- . � , / - / ; I " � I '/" 110t' 0-1/11 -11 ! I I I CEILING OF,LINDER ROUND CONCRETE � II / I )/ ,),'c # (�t �/0/ / " z, 11 , , :-, ,11`�Ill � 'If , I ," 11 :) -,\ - 3 9 / IV, , , / -,1 / / $A ,/ y I �_ � , / /I �� ✓ , , i , I / / ulpli,�P" - .-,. i �� / - / I � ( , , 11 , I-1'� \ I - ,_ I 'r , - I , 1 ,�A_ 1'--, f '-'U ! 1 , � STRUCTURE TO BE EMOLISHED. AREA �, - - .) , - \ I i / ��'fll - \ I I "I � I I I -1. . I ��-_ - _-,. -_ __��/ 11 I I) - ,W,,.�, A�-. / I i / I \ U - (/ �/, "/"_ /� 1/" �� I / 1. 4,�,ti�_ ! - I � . 'i,,:"e,' 0 \ �,�� I LLD WITH SOIL AND -, __77,__ I111 , I I I , �1? " i \ I/ �\ 11 1 7___11/ , \ \ I , I i TO BE BACK FIL � _*411Z�' 1. I _____ ,<:�� 11- \ \,, I 'i� \ I \ \ 'I 11,1, ,-I " " . I I ,�, " ,/,� , / "� -)I,j -"-_.- ) j/ .--* .1 /I kZ I...V W;,1�, -11 "e ", __ " / / 11142 411P, 'rs � - I \ I, f-, I , — , ft _. -A , / . ��_/ 0_1 / / 11 4 1. 1\ \\ I i lw,,-�?4, .11 I_- -1...... I I 1 -� � COMPACTED. � \ - /le I - ,"'11, IV 'r�\ \ \ \ \ \ I\ \ �/ 1/� I. 1011, I 11�- i \ 1, 11 I ---\A �0 / J//F / I __� i / 14/01-1 J I. ==� - it � ( " 11 \ \\ I, \ I It I I C, \ ,\, 11, , 'I---\-,- v 1_,h / - 0 -� ,--, , /1 I, � 11 - __-1-11", \ .......1�c / . \ \ 1; .� I I" \ �", - ,- ,'." .....:__--- .",\, I", ,,- " --, ,- , `I�' , I I � I , � r _ };,. :,•.i ,1 `�� - _, - / I I, I, \ \ I,, \ \ r I. 1�1, � 11N�, �. - \ --�, ., ,I " , " ,,,-1,✓/" __ \' I / \ \ \ 1\ \ FORPIXIIqG BUILDING ROOF i t I . \ , ". Z�� . , I ( I........11.,_�- � - _ - , I , I , \ \ \ -\ \ \ , ... 1. I I 'I 1111-, " I � I / / \ \ \ \ \" \ I 1 1 I �Ii, \ � . �_) ,\ '__I' I �........_�_____:_ '1�lr 11 \\ , , I I \/ t / ! I '� \ \I I, I \ 11, It 1. - � I �S_) 11 1 26.8 �� - .1. I., ,NN'V_ I 1____�", , \" \ y `�A I/ 7 / / / � \ \ STORMWAf iiqii�ILTRATION UNITS I , I/ . i f / /\ \ \\ , \ \ \ -_ ","" � 1 11 _", \ � 1, \ 11 . X I /'/ tf I \/1 1. �,�', \ 11 -1 1, " / i C. -, \ \ I \ \ \ ,,, 1 I , i I\ _V 1, 1. \ I I 11.% ,---, x / ."�!(,, I ---\ /�, I -__---- �,A I " \ " 11 � ,� � / V I 'T \ \ -, \ \ \ \ \ - , I ".., \ \ / __ / I.\I __ _____, - It PROPOSED LEASE LINE \ , lt�, \ I � 1*), \ \ \ I\\� \ \ \ - `,�:� I __�, ,, �_ � ." " - a� \ 11,�, / " " / / / / / \ \\ I \ / /I I� ___-, i \t�I-\�� \ (Y', \ , " . I, / , 4 \'k "_ � . I * 11, \ \ ,,, -- \ k,-", � \ 4__ ' 11 It - 11 , , -- , r -n- - __", \ I \ I \ . I/-..,.,., I - '_ , I \1 I `\ 6.8 ' -_........ -1 ------. i .-'--" \ I / / YNI" \ I 1\ \ \ \ .1 J - ( �_ I I _,�,,�'. -1 Z-1 --.,-- ...... ' I - I I 'll \ \ \ *_�- -__- 1)//�� \ I ' I I --- I I ..... \ \I. I ! I: I�/')t-�/, , I .1 I , 1, " \ I, \ ' \ I \ - I - - ___ -, NI. , -�, — \ \ -\— -26.5—�_ — _ — -./I/ / �'),�.r .1 /" I I I )) \ \ \ \\ \ \ ....... \1 � I \ _11 _/____-_-_-__-7......_ _;_'_1' / \\\ \ \ \ \\ \, \_ ,-/ \'1, __�_ __-.11.1 .... ..._. ,I,,�,_- ____ _�__ , I P� \ I/ - '__� ' I \� � , _ .�,� I- I I � ' ' , , - - � \ ) I -, ___ .-7 _p � _�::::: , \ I / I : , 1-4 I I.... ,,, �,'�',�/,,,,- I It )t , � 1 \ A I \ . .... .I \ �nll�,_ . ---, 'T -C \ \ � V .6;..�% ; � \ I _ f 11 I I" \ I 11 -_ .� 11 I ;; /I -� � / I "I\ I I , __ _ ,,,�,,,v4,ttto,�. N , _ - - - -,,, .. " ; f/ /11 , / , \ \ _�, \1\\ \I, \\ \ \ I , � '5.4% �, " i ` , / I�IX \ \ � X - \ 1\ �' I , �_ / / ; - � \ \ i 0 , � I-,�,(D / I 11 ,�', . � \ ; I 711' 1;110 f I , \ It � I \ \ \ \ 'j , , I 't , \ � . _ 11� - , I �,, I I I \ \ \ 11�').... ...'V�6\ 1- -_ 1111111`��"� I ...I I /1 \ _1'( / /\\\, I I \ \" \\ I.- Ir / / 0 V I \ \ /1, : 1." r I I 1 � 11 " i I "r). I \ _...I \ \ . , ... -�- - I ,;� 1 '.'' ... I / \ � I I I \ -, -, -- \ " t'� I I -_ -� ; "' / // / I \ , I I T 11111111111`� ) �I \ ",_ 1, I I% e 11 / � I � , , / , � I \ I.___ __-, \ \ ,&� , �,;,,,�;� , ,. , EXISTING PROPERTY LINE I \ \ I, ,� \ -, -1 ), I 1, 1, I I / A, " - I 1, I (* ! I I \ \ " \ 'I .....- __ \ __-, � \ 11 I ''I'll�1-11,111,11�� 11 I I IV;- \ �....- \ , -, I . /1"I I // 1 1 I \\ \ \ \ , - \ I � / I, 'I , - III , / I \ \ _ -, -_1�/ I I \ \ \ \ \\ I- - il / � I \ I 'I 11 I......, I / . ,I 'I \ \ \\ \ \ - � \ \ \ V- ; \ J_ " /j -, * � 11101 I/ / / I/ \ \ 1'-�_- \ \ I, . 1, I I I I ; -1 , I / / I ) \ --.___\' \, \ , " , \ I f_I - _ r� � It / `---,,� / I \ , \ '\1 , \ )�-� I i '111 \ _\ I 1, \ S-11 " I'-11 \\ \�\. / \, I-/ - I ,)/\V1�_- I / ! I i 1 20 0 20 40 **, .,- �,, \ 11 \ - - \*S )) /�, 1, \ f I I " " -\ \\ \\ \ I-. .-.-, ,%, "`'. -11, ,-�""-, / \ ;, Y\ / / / I I-,,/ SCALE: I"= 20' " - I/ / I \ 4 �, , ,�\\ \Z ,\ ....I.-I .- , ,-tlfl�,* \ / ! � " ,,,,, 'I, 111 ,,,_:� I ; / / // / ,✓ �, ,I-."\ 'X- Ill\ \\ 1,\ I �I \,I '1Z,I " f I v�,- �, -. � I / I/ �-, " I / I 1-11 OW-11 I,Y-N I, "I I, "', " " ,"�,// � ,) f / I / 111 " � Q" 11 I I "- I - --1 " \ I / Q / I / IJ.\ \\ Agn - ," P(�, \\ \\ 1. - 11 I� , \ _ I- I I I I \\ - - I, .� �N , 1:,_!.,.;,-, ,�)��, ? I I / , - -1 \ \ � : � l i I I / / J�-r� \ , I'll, / -�, . ; I� \ \\\ \\ _-_-___ I" ,I-. _�. `\ \ I, I I,, N """, � I, ,I ( '. / / I i / ( q " 41 Sequin Drive ,� np-,� \\,� \ '�......__-..---.",�... _, I., -11# --- - --/,— \ 1, \_ - ___- ". .� I, I 11 I I 11 ..I .1 I I I .1,11�, - 1, I, -1 I 1,111 _,�,_ I-- \ \ __- , "I I " I : �11 1( I I � \ 1, �_ , " Glastonbury,CT 06033 \�', � , , , � , / It U K _* 1-1") 1 _ , ,--, V .1 ' I 1r, I ,�r, ,_ 11�� - , 1, � U1. I Phone:(860)633-8770 1 ��_, - - - , - I, \ %', �,, _ / I � AN " HO " m,,�-,-� , , k \ \ / / I I / F L I / \\-"" "'-1.-� I I ,,, ,/I.,I ,';�f'� ", ; '�__� , , - 1�1..� lillul"%/�,�"I I � 0 / 1� _I .,_�) , ENGINEERING SIERVICES, INC. Fax:(860)633-5971 - I I -_.__ I\ / \0�,_!'.)1�.,,f4 11 -11 -, I\i: I`,.`�, -, ,�, I, \ �__ "(, , / I / ._1 11-1 www.anchorengr.com ,- I" 1- , w \ \ ,I I I ., , I ,5� \ - 11 � / , _�, �.................................._ / -()ODZON,,�7 \" I"" -, �/ , N \ \ "7,�",� ,4 \. Y� ( / _ I , I , , - " - _�, � 00 -,-I— ; - I t, _,; 11 k ._, .............I - - - " \ j , / AE ! I I -I I _�/t� � C/, � \ \I _" I - ,, , �/ , I to �,,-,i w ,,,, � I I \ ,, " -�\, , _ I----11 -,,,r, -- , .-I Civil Engin,tering 0 Environfrif,rital Cc>nSLfltJf!q 0 Land Surveym- Construction Ma?1 ,jefTnI,n)t " , �n I -.1 .,�_ "' . I .. , .,�i�) PAI-I� - ` . I, I, ----, .. ___-,_1-_ - 1_11? ",*,." I : , _:I 0 -11 J_ I I I. - _ _-- .- \ "I \ , \ f`�,,,� ,, - \ , I _( - I / () , I 11 , ��i;�,� "ljf55't 4-/ -- __� -- - - - - / I / Z.- ,!�_. -1 r"i. - - - - - 11111111111111111111111111111 �,*" --- \, ,,, .� I I I i�j1P'A4I?'j ", _c ,�_" . , , "N I-, 11 " .-.. \ " 11 I, , _,I"I, I ) PROD.ENGINEER I I , I -� , I 11"' MJP I, - �,, -,"t \ " ply"I � , I,, - / , "1111 f .. ."- ,/ // - vl`� _-r1___r_�_1 - PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS , , - - ------------� `,�- '� \ , 1 �, -_ �,__"�,_ ,- ,\% / / , I-_ -_ -_I'll"' , __.� / / MNB \ I 1 t;1113`17,,'�\ \ ,\ , I.. r, *11) I ! \ - " 1�1-�� f " -n ,-, -------------- - - � c , , , ,� 'J ....___ -, � \ , � I , � / ------------___ , _�,�,p,, 11,f \1, '1� I �c/,-,� I, '. - - -, I -- I 1, I -_ _-,-,-, -, OFFICE REVIEW MNB V_ '� 1. �1 - _� I?�_,� __-_ 1__1 * j -1 �,��,_11�111�_ \ , �11," 'o- I , - -� , __e� --I N z, , _� � r _ 1\ - - ;;�� ,- - -�A�rlll, , \ ry ,� 1'),?)�,_ V� , �,, � I -, .-,.__ -__- -- -- PREPARED FOR ------------__ ,X4�, J, 111�' 1, 1, �...... - - I- I � fT 0 �I/ , I--- __._ -t,f \ 1 t" t 11 1_. r _ \ I, \ Z", �,, I ,,., - " -_. ,z,\ _ � -11 \ ,"t,�,- -,- -- " I ," '�,, - - FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT \ ;��,� \ - ," ,�� I" ___--.--_...-I--___ \ I, I , �,� - -_ , - - �� ,, I REVISIONS �� - . 1. \ I, I \ ) I'll 11 11� 11-J, __1 " I I 1p" -__-77 �rmg'-.-.-.--.--,- -, - _ -1 - f I _____. - '7 -_._'_'- I 5.1. I - . I I.", 1, ..'. - - _� D 1 3/2/17 /2/1 GRADING & DRAINAGE DESIGN . _? _� - "\", I�A, -- \\ \ \ � I " I I - (ak- , y�,_ * \ �, \\\`c`- "', , \ ` , , " ""- " I , _�\ `� I -1 - \-11, I I � I \\ ,\,\\ `, , , , , I i i -1-0 I i I I I I I I \1 ,� ) \\ \ � ) \ �b \ \ -- I - tIt _ _ _ � \ --\_ _1�_\I,__", I I I I , \1\ < Z3 -, . I _�fl �" 1� 11 \ "� � � ,, I " i,/-/"\�,,,\ :"R _/,-,� !" \ \ ,\\ \\1 - I -F-1 I�__F' -I,)-, ;1 \I', I'l \" I till, - - 7 - - �__ ' - -- - -\ \___ '3— l � " -` I.-S \_ I I - - �� -_ --/ I I --I-7N , 11�,� __, "z`1 �111' .-�, 11111..............................- It ....� - , - - 1__1.11..-.. /i,/,!,Nv \ \ \, I It I \ / ,I -,", 7 _.- � I - - /VND 0IIV _ ,,, k'i, \ I \ ,,, '-, - I ,� .., � -_ .. .... N -.-; I It \ \ . - / I •11 "I------11 111 ",-, --,-, -11 I., 5/24/17 -I , - I 11 I - ,- -- -, (2 \ \ 11 � .;�_v - ,�_,,,, -'-- , _ N/� \ _. - - - I I _, �- % I, \ "-I __ � __� -_-.00 I , __. -- - I I \_ - 1Y%_y_), 11 .- - �_, I \ \ \ \,-, \ " ,I-1- $ "I - . -� I"� - .r�' I- ,_,____ __.... r, -1r" I - /,,,,' \ , I. -1 _..77 1-11 " .,_� - , "- ,,,--- I - _ /-", WHISTLER AVENUE FISHERS ISLAND, NY ." 11-1 I/ / \ \ I, , � I .1 - I \ \ \ I f, I I �') 1/,��, I ,,, I- I.,. I _ S -1-11111 ." .,- "--_, -- -- , k.�, -- 1/;'1111 -- -, .-- * - � I I \ i .1"')IL IN " - / R u 1,.- ; 1, . \ \, \ �� \ t .11 U. � U / I C�11 111 - -, -,- ,.v - � t,-� j, �- IN1. \ >. ,�-,( _- -_,�' 11111171111�1111 ,", - 1*1 - - -- _' - -" - - PRO)JECT DATE I , I - 2 L_ 4-11...... "I \ \ \ I, , Z� C. OF 9 / i 2 " SCALE: 11`1=20' 013-32 11/8/16 SHEET NO. 4 - : - --- -- --, ,--- --- - - - - I - - - - --- --- - 1. ---- - -------- ------------- - - - --- --- --- - ---- - . ; ��—j ! ; Ll- , � I \,-111... I I-n I it� ,\ --- -) � I I, I i I \ I ( U.1r.',"— \ -11 I ; \ \ I ,I i .-.-,. / �) i I 1, 171", s I , \ , .1 i ", — k . I \" --'It- . \ /, � \N I— I I 11 -: . �,— ; I I I I \ I I " 1. ,,,,,'- 11 Z— � I I-- 1 \, \ \ ", � t - , , ,,, '1� I I--,' 1,-- \ I I 1 \JrA.� �I -- I I 1 , I \ j I ;,e I)I , i- )I �7 , ", 4 -) , -- I , �' \ 111/ 1I i r- -- -�- I ;r , -)/ T. � I.- -- () I F .- /, , / I - \ ------- . , � I I I \ \ f / \ 1-1 ./, I X � I I I / I / i \ ,� I \ / ..\ \ , \ ---- \ \ \I -- ,,_, � f I . - I ', " I ; I , 11 //- I I I , 1-/fi-� , I 11 F \ i I \ \ "�', J I, / ./ I N1, . I / I I I / I , \ ..." \ � 1'-/ I ---� � I I /;i / / \ Ilk I""�' 11 L'/, 4 0 ', "I " ; I � \ \ I I � I I � , / -I I- IX I \ i" � / I i I I / I !\\ \ f , " I I I // \ I �, \� ( I I 1-1 i / I I / . ------__,_,, \ I -- \\,I , "I-,,, 1 I j I I /I "/I "j/, //'./ /I I/ 3 \11 -, " "i"1111..- \\ t;t �, \ - " S -) : / , , � \\ I I ; I I ,; I I ! I I; , - , , - ,� . / i I : / 1,I � I..\ ss�, , f 11 I ,- If,'I,- I / "' 11, i\ "�,--` \ \\ \ , \ -- . I ;I ,-,/I. "' ( \ I I/ - � �, - I I / , ) , \ -- ��, If `�Oli� ::z -:�9",4T,5 ' - " - il, I j / r I I . \ (")1,11� - \ \ , ,� \\, -- ,--- r �., I . V, , I 1-1 ------ \ -/ " f ; I 1, i ,,,, / " \ , \ .......... / I / ; I ! 11 _: \ \ --1 , D Z \ �,----"'\ me- , ' .......-,-.--, 1, I I I I I ( 1. •\ A,,�, Ar"r !m/mr-,", ,3,-,-, . I L---__-- , , I \ I I, It ,\ ! \ \ , / \ - \ F �. -. , ,,,, e;Ii, , 11 , >� \ - I i I , " - \ ,�' , F , I ; ,` � / , , \ - I I I -"".-...._.- / --i -,-, i I I 11 I \ " ,1h I I I ! ,R? -m',, ,, - I ;1 I I f \ ") _y I 1. / , ) -1 I , "!;. / " , I ,,�"\ ,\, \� \"%, , \ - ,/ /-`----------, '.1 /111, 11 / "' �/",v I I � , \ \ \ E 9 ,1 . co , : I I il \ / , 'v ,�// -- I A I - I'll " - - , /// , S,k,�,il - ......---, 51 - I . 11 - \ ...... i I /\ j -111, 11 ";1"......: I , �� ---.,- / i \ \ �1' I- , irm-1 � I ,/� " I - ) ' ' I 11 / , , " ''l, , 11 , I , ,� I ; " \ \ I I , , , ; \ \ ,7��, / . , 1 " I ,/-d . , I / ; I I 0W, ,,,,, " \ ! / I I / , I \ I I `� - M, , \ \\ \\ \ i4 k \ / \ \,\ \ , " / / I , , , / , , ') /,,// ! \ , �� / \ / / \ I "I'll � , 11I., \\ . I , ",� l N--a", ,11 k .�, ,� " I /"", - . - -----4 1 / " I I � -,_,;......... , i \ / - , - ,,� I I \ it\ ,-,',---/, / I . , , 111.1,` I I ,iO I I ., I I "m ,/ 1-1 , " , V t I . -', I . \\ , 1.1I I i I / / \ \ / / I 1, \ \ to \\ 1� I/1> I,-,,, 1- 11 / IX "-< I/ ) Ili \ I I I \ � , i',\\ � \ " \ 41; , i 1, \ , "I ", " .1. " - I/ ) , I % � i i ! 1, -.-I.I .------ � �,\ / I I j / \ \\/,\ I ", .�. I / / \ / , -- --.- ; lil \ l I I I / \ \ \ \�\ \\, I I i k \ \, \ \ , .,� 11 '\ 1-1.1 / " I � I .1 \\ / 10 \ ,/ "I , -,,,, \ � I. ,# 1�' \ ', It. ., / I - - 1. / V ,'/i/l/ � - 1! \ / \ \ --- I /11 , � 11 -.`� ! I dl--L : /, li / \ \ , ---" I I , , I / /\ \ , - i , or" / \ I \ � -- ,/- / ill; "\ " I ji, I �----,,: I -�' ' all/ \ \11� \, // I \ .\ / � I -- / � ( k I ll , 71111 \/, \ '\" \" ,\\' / ,,/// ,' \ \ � � I , I / \ \ \ I - 11 11 \ \ I(,• I " , � t i \ \ I , I --"""-----,,---- \ � 11 � � / \ - \ i I . I'll I ". 1/'11 - - ( i f , , - I ; 'k", I � Lf /- 'I'! / . / \ \ \ Ilk, \ I'll I I 11 1, � I !,,,,� -, I / I 1, \ 1, I . \ ( N 11 , -, I , , � " � I ,j, / It\ / \ \ \ / <,N �k, , 11 � N /I ......--(----------- -.-.,-- /11 I ; /, li, --( I " ",11,; I I- \\\.\\\"\, t 11 1 1 , � " , /! 11 11 . , , I I I , i - / \ \ I \11\ I / '1/ ,I \\\ 11 \ " \ 1\ " 1 \ ' \\ k 01 f . � 1 - I \ , . \4 \ -11- \\ - ! " " -...-'-fY It \ / I \\ 1� j � \ \ " , t I �\ \ i11 \ \ A \ "I" \ -",-,--, �,\\ \7 i \\ , \ I ( V --) \ 1-11 i II, 1\ ,\ \ i \ 11 , -11---- \N / i ( ---- ,\-O-" , . i -I -1\ \ , \ I �jwi` i ill 11 , I/ \ I \ \, \ , 1 \' \ � % ; , I I I 1i If 1"�91-1�1f');� �/A I \ -X I �-/�-I;jf'\l(�'/ )r- .1, \ \, \ , 11 " I 1 7 i- / \ - , � I I ( i ii '\,f�',�f'6 41�-',,,�/-�� \, \\ I / I le \ \ ,I-- "'. I - ,,, ! i I I I jj,j/vL,X,-j) V , ') , \,\'," \ \' \ \ \ \ . I I I t it I i, :U Vf� \\ I . ; / ,�, \ , ,,,\ \\\\ \ , " \ , � i � -1�,, \ '-- I /" --1 I , , I I . � / ( ,� - ( I /I /,Zl-- \ -- \\\ ., - \ \ , \ ," 5 1 - ,�-- I -1b \ X k1--1) -� ,; / .11 / /1) N �1 / ---- -_ v liy 4 � 1 i I, ,, I , \1 \ \ 1, ii,. i, - , / /-, -.11-... -,-"---,- \ ,,.,,�t,x \I. - 1 i I I . � V, pf , ,/\ \ � < \ \ \* I-X,-)�, \ - - � ,\\\\"', , X ; ! \ I � I i I \ I � 1. I \ r1l, ;-,,-- " / I I -- - -,-�,",I, / I \ \ \ -1,f/\ -, \ V � � i, � I I I 1 !I ) ilI'l I ,, ;",'�,,,l" , - -- , \ ) ,/" /3 I` - \ I ., - I \ � i 11 �, \ � I ,D \ "� " I I� \. \--- -- I -- \ \ \1 1.1�0 / ,� f"A --1- - -1-, ,\�,,\\\\" \\,,- " " � I , , - ,.-, \ � 1\ *,I I ! --4i \ \\.N� ",\ " , " / 1 1 1 / \ ,- I I /1 (._%/\ I \ \ / 1 11 - - ��,\ , � I I i" ii -�i / I ,`�-`-, \ I �,// ./ - - �\ I "\ \, I \ Ili I - , \ \ / , . \,\ \\ \ \� I i I , I I \ ,I/ , \ \ I \ \ \ If / \/, --- �'.. / . , I , "" \\"\ \ \ , \ \ Ill I 1 /I I 11 0", /k","- -I-,--- I- \ k,'� I I /.~,. /` if - - -, , / -I 11""', .I , " 1 I , / ",,� ill' / 11� *, -�, I 1\ ! , " , , / , / \,"'V,��,-, " 1\ --.* -- ,\ . 11 I / , \ i \ X "A' ,'� , ..., f! , t/,/E-- , \ � 11 , / I / \ \ A\\•\\ \, \ \" \, , : I 1 , \ I 1.-- -1b \ 1\ .- I " , ,\ /", - ',>� -, I \\ \ \ � � I / �el - , 'I \ ,\ .X ......� -11-11....... � \ ,� ,/ i 11 �: /" 00" '-, ,',� ,"" / \\ \ \ , \ \ \ \ I I I ,,, /, ! ; 'I \,� \--l- �%/ , ; \ 1'� \ "l- \ .11 " ,,,,� , \ \ 1, \'. \, \\ *, \ ,, I I I t f / ' , I \ /"-" / " � , 11 i \,�!.,;,;-1/ I , " I I . ,�" \ , " 1. 11 Ili I ii I ,,,r/,,,,-- "I , " I \ ')f I/ I _� , "�, \ . \ �, \ i 1 1 1 ` ; " � � \ I / � \ \ 1 . I" Jr. --- " " I , , , \ \ \ �\\ \\\\\ \ , \ \ Ir . i - - -, ) , \\ \ I , �' , ill I I I iA '!, 1-�,- ,�-Z�,' -.- --- \ // 11 I � , I ...;-:Y� f -,-- I i I , "I I I ,� \ \ . I \ , , , " . I "I", I I f / // .."/- r�,:5,i ri,�.- I , 11-% � , / " / \\ \\, , � , \ � N 1,-1/ /,/I-, ,�-1. I I \"\ \*, , , -- "N, 6 \ N -�\ ,.1 < \ \ I-- . --�ND 1 1 - I \ '---, I- )t / A'<"'" I I-- 1\\ " \ ,� I \ I \ 1, I I I ! I I I 1 11//,-- V - /'/ / \ -� \ \\ / L/ \---", \ I \ , / ) \\, 1\ / ,�V 4 \ 1� I \ \ I ---� -" --,-\"" -, � " I \ \ :Iu( I I ! I . % I I \ \ k 11/-,%, - �, .,, ,� I \ \-\\�,\\\\\ o\1 \, . / / I /\ 11 ,,, 1, \ \Z�\\, " � \ \ � \ -- ---:�,I'.;:� 41 / - , , Ii I , " I _ " `/ ,V, �'"y � - 1. , / -,,c I I � 1� " \ I P f 1-/ - S -� - ---- '\ � �� i, I lk �\ \ \A, \,�, \\ \ k, , , 11 ; , - -,, -- -, ,- ",/, \ I - I I , \ I A/N//'\,/G �" , � , , N, ,r,:)[-I I 1 \ , / � , ) �-, 'I-', \ j X , I I f 'e-r, , ,�\ N , , -" � . " , ,I, I- "'n-,", . " \ \ \\ \ \\ �,-, \ , , " \\ , ( � ill . I 11 . I 1\ 11 11 \ \ \ ! �, / I ,\\ \" \ \\" \. I I i I , " -"--, -,�Q�,--�!,-,t,r-",-,, \ I �\\ I l ,"� \ ----, , \ \ \ \ I \,\ I , 11 11-, - �',, - \ N, i ! I I \ \" \ \, , , - 11� \,�', / \ 1, 1\ \\ -k- I \ , T- ),\, , S , ! / m, . - ,,:-::��.. ..........�.....---,---. L L-' \ � I I I L \N \, I I I 1 �', \ \ \ , \\ , \\, \\ , I I t -- , I � _ 11 / I \ \ .1, `,,,r , \ %S1 I I , 1 � "i-11" ,I lil,r -, ,,, ,�, - I I I 1\ 4- 0 , � i\ \,,� " I -I" I - I e-? , I 11 If 1,\I I , - �, - , --- -\� , - 1, I, , ,� I�,,'4-- - , CE I \ \ / � " \�\1 -. -\ *1� \ , I\ I I \..\ - , � " r��,�'. "I - �,N I i, \\\ . I \ / -11 \ � * , \ I \ -X , I " I I I- \ \ \ I \ \\\\\\\\ \ 1 \1, \ \,\\ -�, \ ' '� \ , *✓ , " §IL,T� <, \ i 111-� 0 , , ,,� I - \ , \ \ ,; --- , \ , N I'll, \ \ i I -1 \ I \\\ \" \\ \ , I I / , \ \ , \ , , �, - .�- , 11 \ \ \ . , \,\, \ � I I ,"N't'),�,"; -,- - - - � \ ") 0\ . i , , ... 1\ - , I - I " - !,--'�j, I i '1� ; ;`-- I I \ \ I \.-��- ) \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ I ... �w. 11�"--�\ - ----- ) \ "", I \\ I � i� \ \ \ \ � : \ \V, \ " \ ""I, ,� , .11 I \ , \ \ i I I \I \ I I � . \ \ 1, \\\\\ \ , \ 1, ,, , - � -� , '-,� . � \ -- I I \ I , I f -(I'-- \ \ \ " , - \ �, .1 , Z�,P- ,� \ \ 1\��\ " , / \ / i i !I \ \ \ \, \ \ \ i 4 1 \ "I \ \ , k\1 I k,l\'\- - \ \ \ f---�\\\ � I I., \ \ \ I I , ) � I --�,,'.,, \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ ,\, - 1, ,I ,� 1?< "- ---I , --- I 1, �I \ --- p, ! \ 11/' " , I III-" ", 1:1,ic, I "I� \ " kl�) I , , -;� \ \\ \\, \ , \, - , -I I,-- I .�, -- I'll I-------- I -- \ " S, \ \\ 11\ ,\ ,�, / ,.% . / . " If ` ..1: I / \111' \ --- \ \ \ \1 I/ I ii I /1, / "I "Ill I I,,", , � - -`--�' \ 11 A I ------ I \ I i I 'f \ j ) , T) \ .."�- I . , NNI- �-1 -,,�-, -- 1% \ \ / 'l, I /. � Ill , '\,�"- -, --e\ \ I \\ --,.- ( I --, 11, , "I � .1 --�, - -I \ " I-N '- - V f -- 7 l 1 , I , 1-2"IlIX" \\ X-1-1 - r , I I 1� - / ,�- \ , / I't \ , I I i I .f " � \\ -,N / ) �, 11, , .,",�, 7 �N;i- - , 1, \1 �._� 1 /, - ,�\I N /I : -\ \ , \\ , Ikl- -1. " - , 0 - "/, \ \ \ � , II � I " \ , .. �. " --,4 — - ; . � \1 -, \�I / \ 1\ \ \ \ , 4,�; It . II.- ,,�, \ ,,\ , " -� \ , fi:,f �-s ' \\ , \ I - .\ \ / "' , ��,// \\ \ \ ,, � , 1' ,\ I N. -, \ � II .. I P-1I —� ) " \ %,�/ / \ - , - '71 - I c , , �1, \ I \ \ \ I I I % k , /- \, ---,,::--- I I I '�— " I , I ---- I I � 1, I , , I I � _11 r, �",\\\ •1,-,(I- \ � I \ � 11 , I - e I I I l I I l 1�,,-,I !""� I . I\ //fir''/ .11 I-, ---,,(-, 1, \ 11 - I - .- , \ � I \\ �\ \\ I 1, \,\ / / ,/' '/ I 1 ; 1 I I : � (1/ I \ , //' \ � I I 'll , 1-� ,.-, ��' , N\, \/ � i�- - \, ; , \�\\ \ � \ - -.--- I e \\ �111 , ` , \\ \ \ \ I I 1 t I 1 1 \\ 1' / " ",\,\\ \ 1 \ \ \ ---- ------I I , 1\1� 11� ----�I - /1,\\ ---------�- ------ U , k /// ,�-. " - - - \ \ \ ,I ! I'\ 1� , % 11 \ \ I - 1. 1, --,, \ - -,/--�,� ......... \ 4", 4 z - i , \ \, \ \\ \ \ \ I 1 i 'l I I' " ) I \ �11 / " ,/ \ " -- ------------ - -- ---. - \1 ��. " , - - I , , I I., I I N " I " \\ \ /I I ,::� Z, r -- , i 1 I I '! ...�, ,'\',\",\"\\\-�...... .....-- ,q�� '1� / , \ \ � : 11 \� ,I \ \ I N \\\ 4, -- , I �-/ \ I fjf,,�/ \\ // \,. , , \ ", 'N - - -. I I, I " X -, z .7 VAO I - r,'--- - - � I - -- I" I - , I \ \ \ � I -z-_- �- , -- , , � \ \ \ i I 11 , 11 \ \ \ /" --\\\ \ 1\ \ -1-1-11............. --, k, - � %""" 11 I . -1 6 1-. ,� ,� \ \ y/ //' I \ \ -.1 1--, I ,4 1 ,- I gril , , ,\ \ � -1.1--.....------ I- It I --,-, I � "\", , . \\ '- . 1, / 11 �) - / 11 \ -� " \ \ \_1 \ I � I � i 11 � . I'll I �� "! i i - \11 \ , \`,� / �1 \ ---" " I NI I - N f-I I .A�,, ,,,, I " 1, \ I I 1 I 1 � I I I 1 1, I 1 ) V1 , ;, f - �\ 11 �� , , \ %�., - \ '� I , -O-"-,-- I", , " - �i \ \ " \�, \�\\ \\ I \ I \ t'l.) � I / i � � , 1.f , V \ \ \� (,/� - �, ) , " - - - -, \\ -- I 1/1 I , , I I\ / / -/I-,-,---. 1 I i � i , X , 11 %�� \� ,\\\ 'k�.,� I - -'- I - I �- , -) 1-- ) , I . ,-14 ,/,,' , ,\, , \ - L-- -,r-1 , ., , - 1� -_ *"'_1 -1-1 I -6 r�- ,-- , -) I / I \ \, \ \ `,1 p I \\\ \\ - I - , \ / W ./---.--- ,- q 11 1. \ \ I I \ � \ \'\� - , -Y--- / " ---___ r, # - , \, .1, I/ I 1i k [-I I I i-- \ � I I . "IV �-��,_------ , ., -, , --- �,-�I \ I I \ CP i \ \I .\11\1 I " I \, ,A, j -, - , / \ ---- I --- I � I I --,-- - - -- -1 '\ - - - . ---- ' � I '/ -�, --" -- - - - \ , ,,W j " 11 � I I I / 1q, \ V, \ I Is � , \ , I -I, Q N; i -_-- �, � -- - \ �, \ I \ -1 \-, ,,, \1 /. \ / I \ \ -----/— , , I lam I/ \ \ I I 1 1 IN " I" ----- f 11 H I\ I \,� ,-- .. ) /- ,., \ k�\ I 11 11 " \ I I \ \ , I I I t, - - - ,� () 11 - - I \ \ \ - 1-� \ I�, --- ,\ \�\ I (" \\ \ I \ ! i )l I I \ I \ ,\ "1", / '1� - -- I I \- I I \ \ �11 \ , \ \ \ \. ,\ \ \ �I I 11 I I\ \ ,\ \ \ " , n\ \,- i I -F-.---- ? -� ( .", 01 I I I ') � /11/11 ," � , / . \ \ \ \ I /: I i \ � \ , I I \ , 1< i / - I \ ,�, / , -1 , \ \ -,--, , -- ------- -,- 22 , , \ \ .<v ,w , - \ \ \ \\ ,, \ 11 , 1-� - / �--- -.11. 11 '�-, 1, , \ ,.- I \ ,,, , , \ - j - " \ Ill \ I /11 "I I \ I \\ � ; 1010 k _.a` \ ,-- " .�� " ,------ (:1-01 "" \ -� \ , . ,\ \ 0--\,: I. I ,/ 11 , - ... � . I I I I 1. \ ! I � II .\ , �I... ....- 11 , - --- .,-' � --- I - \ - , I . / \ \ , -1,- , ; - --.--"- , - I -.O-A,*-7 , -)I-V,I- 11 \" I \ -- . \ '\ 9, ---.-/--(!�,- I "I I - I /' - \ I \ .. -,-------- . �, / �', I . eep \ \ , 11 lz ,----, , k',- I I 1 )" , \--- �i \ \ I 11r:,- ,L`\✓ � r- , \ I ii It -�, \ � " .. \ \ , " " "":,�f,-, / . 1. , �- �,/)I 111% I , "I \ ,/, k \ .1`0 \ \\ \"-. \ W""M�'- .,. I "111-l" \\ \ I .� -, \ , , , ,/ " - 11 I --,'\ --I ------- -,\ , , "" \ j L- , J k.- ,- \ \ w. 1,111 "I I I \ \ � I - " \ \ - - , "/, - ! i" --` I'll I % -�, -- , 1-1 /- I I " \ , I . \\ "I - .0e, -1 -.. 11 )! ( " --- - .. , I , , , , i \ \ I ( I \ : \ \ , 1\ 1, " ,;--- i Il - JjL - , 1 \1 11 , -1 " 'N \ \ I I -111, 1- , ----- -------- - I " i \ / , , \\ \\ \ \ , /, 11 -1 I 111`111 \ \ IN- ,�/1', -----"-'I----- , I.. - .1 r , i 11 I - 111D / --r, I I \\ I " I - \\ 1I - , , I \/I ', , - 1\1\ 11" I 1,�, \ I 0 I -I�11 - ""-",------/ I 11 I I - " � 11`i/ "', , , 1, \'- - / I \ I/ . 1, ; \i I-, /A I I . 1, '*, \ I 1, I/ - 1- I- , I � 11 ---- I I I - -, ,- 'I---------- -1-- " ---- \\ 11 I 0. , I I [..... -- '. ",jl " .1 -� I ,` i - W ,/-,- -�-, ----,-' \ , I 1 .40 11 ,,, I I , 1, , ... -��, , I --1 - � \ \ k I \ I I i j I \I 1 1 1,/' I 11 - 1, , ,� ---- I 1� \ - 11 Z�,, --, I--- I 1 \\ \" \ L, I i "', \, , I i f I'll / N� I �\ '1� / \1\ I � �� 11 I`-----II, \, i I� 11� 11 � \ l 'i, I I 1-"!U` ,�- "'; j /\ , , � \ � � ",�, , oe\ - ,I "Ill""' -\ \ I / )�r!") I '�-- / � I ,� " \ , I,- - i N11,-`�, 11:�\Vb I \ )" \ I !� I * \ \ - " , I -, "" 'I � -�-X / ----I__ -------- - , \ I\ \ -1-- -------,.-' � .\, \ *4, \� -, I / - � I - I� -- .- -:1 I ,, 11)irl" ",J� \ \ \\, \ -, � // ... ,�--- t I- ---- ------____ -------, \\ 4, \ " / --- '\\, i � \\ I ---------- \ \ 1 ,� -01 \ \ \ \ 1/!//! 1 1 ---I 11.1-11----, ... \ � 111. -- _1111.-- -,�-, --31 1 / / � 11---., �, , ) - / I , 1, \ ��. ; /- \, " "-.1.1-1- ....-- , I "///,/,/ .,-- I/ \ I I \�;� � I� i . .,,,'- - --- ---- / - / 1, �---- _ I "///, - / 1� � 11 - -) \ / 1--d I '. \ `�, - , / \ "I'll'," %I I I 11 � -.----.----.;; ",-------\/I`�-//- --- , --- - I I '7l&I , N - I \ I " I � , )" _�-, - .. --"---,--I- 1111�"" I � -�7 1� \ ,`I- , -'I\- - i ----- .......—------------------ - I --- � , k � / \ I \ "i-) A ,-�-�/ \ " - I , ....... l , , ,-, / ,\ I , Vi� --" \ , ,- -- ✓ \ ...... � f- , " \ \ �\ * \\ ', -,-, I i I ,-I / L-1. / � -�'- \ "-, "N" ---,, --.----- -- .� -- --� -y \11 � 't),� I /, -- , , , I I 1, I I � 1\ \ . I / , �,-1 , , — . " - - / 1,I", \ \ I / 11 ---..--.--.-------'---- - --, I "`l-,"--- ---_-.,-I.. � I I / - I \ -V-1---.----,.-.-....--.--11----...,----,---"","-,-,-,........i......-"--- -11-11---........... -,-- - \ \ , I - 11 � I ,l'i'll -.,..- - � I . I \ J-)� I �� I I �- �,", --A,- I � 0 ,� . "I -N " - - " , I ��--, t,"_.% ,� / . I \- \ \ , \,\ • . 100, , - -Nll, - ��---"%/ I , I I �',\�,) . � \ 1% \ "I ;-0 ,� ,I) . " 1, I \ \ �� "' 1.1, - �- I- ,� � ......... " I , y�-� �_-;�,� ........ \ I � \ ,-- ,�,,,,1,,�"U".'I \�, 'N", � ." \, N' ,-- I 1� ;, .... - 1-0� .-I \ \ "�/ 11 �1-1 N \ \ k\ (-i � 11 '°"q,`"•" " 1, .. � '/ I I'-�Z� �//-" l / . I \ � 1, - ---I- - - , \ "I I 11I?Pi - - ,?,;"-,�, - � I'll >\ 11 j \ \ , I'll I "6,"-,, I "N' \�, -, f . I I � -- -- I . i" � �, \\ \ A". V \ �-, k, \\ 1, z I " , -- - 11 -, " 'I '7�i' / \ � . ;Z�-- SILT FENCE ",-- L , "N' ,�� I /I N -- I - / :, I 1, , , ,-.1, --�', -1- -" -, 11 \ I 1- I \I- il I',;/- - �-�---,-- ,I - -�, - �- I I " '�i ,;�ii� .Z/ ---�,�, ��,' ----- -- // , � . I I \Q, , . I 11-1 - I 1. " - -'Z, ---- -1� "..... -Sil., ,-I---- I , ,\, \ p i,\ /E D �, \e!j(6&, g- -1-11-1----- --------- Z-;-� 0\ �at.,. Vo ,\ r \ ) \\ \ 40 \ \ \ - , ., \\ , - -,9 \ "- I , ,- Z:1 - I / / � :"- k' \ \ ,� -, . -- I *- I i S".--L-; . %�',- -%1%,-- - I-V 11 / I ) I "+'\ ,> -1%, - "\ 11 , \1 ,\ lv'c-)/r-, , , I/ � \ .. � \ . . \ - -", - - -- '� "'Y-Vp io-/ � --�,, i ,, , I ,/ - 13EGI SILT / : , ,11 �rlv'11, \1 \ I 10 , *,"-" \ I . I .., \ - --7, �, /- f , -/ r, ' - � \� 1, 1, - \ --I -,., I r \ , I I " ".1 I/ N , i \ I -- .) - R'z�i`V1- L I FEN 11 � , . "I \ A h' \ I ,,,, - I'- 01�1 , , P0, \ \ \ N-� � \ " - I '1�1'-I / /'/,,')--/ I I . � . I \ / ti \ V \ \ /) , . .. .... , -, /... I ; 1 K�,,,\,!G -111 1, I I \ , i I \ \ i / \ - , I ) --� ,;` -�- li Ec DR11 t /- I \ ; i I '. - . , "I . , 0110 1-- p\ 11 - :" ,--�%'- \ I I / , , I I i \ ,./[ - 1, \ .1 .1% 11 \ \ \ \ , �1 : . � 11 I r ,z� 7 " I ? \ i / " -7 " ! / I I \ \ \ \ - 1� \ It' %1p \ \ \ ) , / , Ic 2-- --�\ \ �, 011 . \ 1', -�-�. 11 � 7 if I T- \., - � / \ . , --� -�� .1 /I - - "-" ' I 1 , I 1, \ \ \ \ , - - - . L: - .., I , - I \, \ //("-" - - ; / / - I , / 11 " \ I \ . ,�� - --�-,- � \ 11 w // .. 7, ZjE) ,- , " ", ml I I / ..., > -- f I \ I '. I I I --N " I I i 04, 11 �- -\ \) 1> /\I / 11 // \ 11 I \ \ t� I I 10 I .1 .1 '� I I \ , \ \ \ I � -� / i,:) , "- ,---., , I, / / \ ` , f I ViI -, I -) i \ , ..---- " I- A -71 ,,,, ,-I I -I I � \ \ \ " I I/,�--i,� / 7 - �� I * - ,` .1"( --- 11 ;1 / I" --- I- le -0 -- 'I- ///-", I ,, " - V f ',- --y"i I i 11; I — -- I V\ \ / / ,---- 1- 1\ 1', �, I, - I Y111.I - � -.,/,, - I \ \ 001, r/ *f -1. \ \676 / �Z--�, f /-1 0 1- /'/ "\\, \ � �- / , — -I- � --I 1 .f, V> / \ .1. \ ... -- , 'I ;� ,/-o 1 \ --I , I\ \ \\ \1 \ I . I "', 1`,,, " I /I I II, \ \ 11 \ I ,/ , i r-,I 1,; I I ...... -- -�,4� - `�-j C) I // I \ - \ ) \ \ \ \ \\\\ 1�1 \ \ \ \ 0 � ;11 -�- �. I , \ �c', (_l',,� \ -,, -, � ,- N� " 'I -- ( --, I I 1/11?1** i , / \\ �\ / \ \ 11 � \ , 1� 11 \ , k � / ...N \,"'O", .,�� , I ./ ,, /I C,,`�, I --" ---,�--.� V, -I- , t '41 , — ,A -, / '\ \\ \ \ 411\\, \\\ \ \ --- � "I I \ \ \ — , - ,-,, --i, ,- j(�� 11 /I \ I J` , I 11 `,,�, --" --,, / - ---� 4 \ X \ \� / I \ \I 111% . /� \ \ \ \ , / I 1\11 ,I I.- " - --,., -\ - I I" � , 0. )-\\ --- S/ \ \ 11, \ \ ", I r / 1, Nk 11. I ( I � (" \ \ � \ I , - I I 11 11 , --- -<�Vri -) / IN I,/ / ,\ \ IN , \\ I � I � / \ 1. , 1, -/ \ \1, I \ I ,, I , " --- O�,;'. --) \ N \ I .1 ( 1 7 - \ '/ I I-1 I . #'.�, � i - - f I \ . I I � I I \ �,/� , 1, -1I , - -,, --,'X. . ". , --, "c/j, " /// rA, I / .1 11 I I . -/;�� I/C / .-.- , -1 -.) 1\�, I I \ \ \ ---- 1-,�I I -m-- I / /I I ., 1, I f I ,�, -- /�, /-, --"-- - ,,.Z-.;��-� ) -- I . f I- 11" I , I //, .11 I I 1\ I I \ 11 I\ ". "I 1, -- / � - 1, "" . / ,^,�%- %0 " I , , , N--", � - \ \ " \ ------_., " I -1-1- \ "/ ," Y , \ .111" , ' I '� -/ ,,, " I 4? , 1'\ \ / '/', , \'\ - I , -� -N<1---1 /)1 -,'�-" /'�)-,- ,� "of 1, \ . 4 ,\ / I 1\11 , , -,; \ I " ( / \ Z I I I / �c" V---, \ , ,\ ( , / - \� / \ , -�'��I- .-,-' / , r / ..4.....;f----,-------\ "---. 11 -1 \ ,, \ '% � \ \\ \ �`I, \, \,f /!/, ,- " , 0,-&�F; --��V------Z--- \ '\ \ � , ; I / , , , V -, I" ,�, \ , I V , \ I \ , I 11 jIl � , \' . 0 11-1 --- �- -/"V", / � \ -,- , , \ I I ', -> , . �/ - . --- � ------", , / --- , - m / \ , , 'A 1 �.... / I, I, ///' ., "I \ I \\ , . xv,/,-\ \ \., I", "I" \ 11� ." I -///V - . I ii / � I / "I . \ ,( I/ " -� , �11 N"" I \ ,I , �; \t-'-,, PROTECTION 1, *'�Sl-1-, ,�N�1� 1-1 ,-) -- �, I / I, \ \ , 1, \ , \ \N" -- I . �, \ 1\ I, - I -, ,/ , ", \ 1, ,"Q�, , INLET . 11 - , - , V, . I I 11 1, X, � ) � �,,I \, I'll, I I 11 I 1� i I ----_, -r-- I i / / / - ", ,� , \ �, h &-i-r- / ., - -", 1, ......��N�l .-,--... i ) [ , 11, ; � I I \ \ 1, N\ -/"-,T,,AV *1� I \ r 'ir, -1,��. , , / I ,� 1 4 1 ,/-V, ; \ 1'��" � 1, -- I - , .. ---- F " I \ / I \ - ", /',,,-///""', - '11, "I % 1-11 i- ; --- I , ,,i, I �, --. .1 1-IN "I -1111--", "----' /11 "--- L, , I -- -1\ \ �If / I - --' /' / / / -, , \ \ I "/ /11, I , I - D /;,�". I'\ 1 '��, - --r, I il/ , - -�� 4� \ \\� " 11\ (TYP.) \ 1<:------- , \ ,c0-;,,,�;//.,,� ,/ I I , t \ � V. 1%1�1.-1- ,, � 8 - I \ I / - / I . "- I , , 1, \ I ) \ /;" / , - '. // \ - ,\ ,,, k, A, \ , \\ ......, \ , \ -, , - I ti, I --w' \ \ , S - ,� I \ I' / \ -'�tl -, ,-, / / / .11 I I - \\ I 1, '. " "I \\\ "�\ " , 11 , \\ I '-, " - .111. ---- ""`�- - -, I / / -, // ,% ----- \ ? 4 X \ 11,�- 1, \ 1\1 . /' , /\ i -,, - 1. " ( I I ", \--- / /1111 I 1, , \\ I \ \N, \ � 1. I., -\%, " \ -:�,-," r/- I - - , ,----- --- I" , - V, I 11 If. � , . ,',�,- ", , I \ 1i / 1-. \ "I '-" .- .-- / -1- I I 11 , I / I ,, - 11 I -I . I / I , 1. e- 1, // I 1, I I �" � 11 ; -��111, / , - <� I ----111. \ / I ,"r,- ,00`,- I -,,,�,-,N, \ " I, , - -'/ / \ )� I l CIA -1...... 76 / I V ) I , / ,,qm-,�A�-, ,- / \ \ ) \ f&i �'t'A 17"//'/-/ / " / I ), \m, \ / IZI. , I 111i I - \ 41'%41,1101 , .11 /,bX 11 , 11\N, , - \ \ / Ilk, \ 1- V" � / I ", , / - I� / /( / -,-, N17 , 11 I I .-'\� \ : 1> , ,�� "" > I \ 1 7 -- 1. I " 1 , \-��,1\� \I / , \ T-r- / -- 1��\ I "';A, -"� - � ; " /;� / -, 1 "\, -%%,/z/ \ IQ I r - \ I , , , -- - " i�'; 11 - 1%. / , I I ,,, . I , - - ) /-�j I \ I ,�Z,r- /I - . I \ V .- =,; z I I I L-//----/ - 0---I t --.-, . � ''. I � ,,, --r--,,.-j I \ -, - - \ " 11., � - ----. ,'\ " . " I ," � I \ , , ----I. r-a ::,- I- I I "-- \\ \ ( \ -- -��, -�\ \ ,�� 1// \ \ - ,,;, " -- i�, , I I/ ,--- -111-1, ,-\-\ 11.\�"/ , 11�1 \ ,,--pl I i \ \ 11 \ " i 1/117 \ I / /' I � , �� '11, I \ I I\ , \ ....-1 , - I . , #0111)(.",/) �\ , , �11, ir I I I 1.,� \ ,//// . " \ �\ Ili,%, - jf--�- \ � \ `7� ",lP \ \ \ , , '---, / � � � E14b S�1614 CONTROL BLANKET \ \ , I I — �A , N I I I .; , 11 ---- � -\\\ S T(,)F- , I � -- I - "t, , "I \ / I I-- - / ,r- ----- I- /I / / i �1 � / ; .- -- -- -------- . 11 - -- V / ,0` wr , . 1k \ --,----1 I -- ./ I I .� I - , S-/('N -- 1 / - \ , - I - -,� -- I \ i I "I---I I) I - d / I � \ �%', \ ---,- , �\ I I " \1� ) I I '11� k '11, \ "/"/ 1` - / 11 \ I \ \ �-. / /,- � , \ 6 " 'i / , \ r� 1::))I/ -1� -- / -'? \\ X -�� - 2, * - I N , --- . \ L-1 / I I - \ I\% N \ I I I I 1111.1�', � I -, \ -- - I I Vc ---..---- //1- -1//V V- - ---- . � \ \ , \ , - 11 \ , \ N'�,\ '---" -�i '\ , / � / / / \7,6 \ - I - X \ \ I, \ I I zs: \ -0, I - i - I I / '\ \ , \ - ----1:7 --.--.I- -..... 1. I., I , - - � I -10r�- ,\, -I , \ I \ -.1-1- , I "I � "' 1\1 0(-)lr� .-f'. I, ()/-) , / ) I 11 / \ � ., � - - i 11, - -- - �7-5"�' / p `--I \ / , - , , , 1� / I . , - \ I \1 -- ........;.,,'- \�- . i \ --� \ Di \ \ - " �-, \ \ \ -, 1-� X I ) \ /,� ------.,--- " , I',,I I , � , / ---" i \ 1\ --- "�- ..........- " " I I I : I I \1 N , , 11-1 ; � ) � k 11 - - 11 ---.-- ---,N 0- -,1.11� 1-1�n I I - - C, ...- I /� \ ? � \ - , � ; "" / \ 1-- /- ,--- , II I �11, / -,---..----- , - , ,� � , / N�\ " `--1 11 ,,�) (--, - .-- I- I , \ "--,.-,.- \\ , , \\ 1, I 11-1\i, �- - 1-3) / ------- 11 I ... , \ 1 --__4 ,_ V-) i 11 / .. 111i� I I , , 11 I , -, / / I "I'll......e )/ (��,,. / / "' , - 11 \ A,. �, 1, I, - , I- I [:, j/ Lf-- � I , t f , / --1--,--" I -N t" I / 'It", A, I '\� I Q I- 11 I c I - -- !"/..�" I - � , , � // -- � R 0 -"-)--r - \,I� \, , / / 7 �, ., , '4`N, ,I:),- V, , -I / - -, -:�7�-� %- I F—; � I V ., ��/, / -.-......... - -, ,, " ) ,/ . " -1 ONC,r�r- -,-,--. ,'--�--,� � I �- *---- -1 -11.11-- \ T I -.1 -�-� I'll, I - %, I" ., '-,, ,,,� -, ��c / I ,,�".:;; 0 / -1 \N, - - *-�, , , --"-- -,,, I;, , - \ "I" , , \\ � ------, -, .. , , : ----- \ I - I I I , , - -/ -1 \1 ,- I I /, ,� --% \ / I �� I V I��.) , ) / -- / I �1'11,' - I i , 11 I - -1 'III", I I i /--�f-) t / - I vmoi ./11 -- -( \ ) \ I -1 *1N 1\ / - , 11�4 - \ '.� I , Q I-' -t--- >e,,, , -- 11� 1/1" I .1 / // /— I �- � , I / \ 1--/� 1/11�I /I \ I�, \.\ I \ - "- -- , I ,4 � '\ ", :,��' 111" I - 1, \ , 1 I " , — I ��-,�--- - - — I I - / I- I , 11 / -" / / t)" ,, 11 \\ I , i ." ,"', \ :: I I / / I / " . I I , ,I I ,\ 11 "I "-i , - --- I �I I I - - / 'I / / / )1�\ � 11 N 1\ \ I I., -'I,"- I � 'Nil --1 -1 ,/I I � .11 N \ \ 0/.. , '�*- " // \ I N - -7 I I / -- I\ \\ 7---�- ------- ------- - - I �)\" I- \ / N \ , 2/ / ;, " ),:.11,1, \ I/ \ 1, // \ \ .1 i -',6 -- "I / 11 \\1�-> /4�,�'It,�,d - \ , ... ...,�) \ 11� � --, -,ii� ( , I -1 � � / , I- \ I �\, / \ -�' - - -> // , � , ,N ',I I ) . , - \: - I /- I ,� -V,�, " --/, I , I I I \ I, / // I / I \ \ \ . .- ) I- \ I ", ,.� \i`11 - - k I I I . ., 1111.",Z -I I/ 11"k-', I -- I/ , - - � / \, ,/ I ,�,,,�, Ae, " \ \,\, X ,-- - - \ I / / V/ 117 -- *-% \ 1 )- / I \ \ \\\ /111 I, \ 11 \ %� I 11 11 / ,a 1-. 11! / , - /- ,(- I / 1-� I- I ./ I / .,''/./ . N, \ / . \N `11q .:�� / I -\� \ " \ / 1% It", - -, � - --- - - 11 ii I / -,- - - f '- \ 1-� I I I , 11 I \ I" "I . , ,/I/,, / I- " \ \ ,�,\\ " ., I / - ,-/ "","P -" \ --- "f . ,-- .. - ; / // , --- �.-. --- .1, ",\ 11 --I ---"� ,- --,,,, - I � / \ I ) \ I/ i I / -� - - / ." - -----------.1.---.: �. ,-, � I i ,I , \ I 111--, 1, - -.,�, �, ,,, -/ " 11 ---- / ,//"'..'.-I.... ", - I, 1-. � ;I � / I I \ , ¢v}",. ,\�,\�1-��- _ � K, / 11 / / 11 - - / / ,(, 1�� , , - •I I I 1, //' I ,N- I � I " I / / , - .1 / , /-1, - \ -,- !;; I , -,-�, /,- -- \\,\\'- , ....t""\ I/ 71-�-� / / , 1. ,i I 1". . , \ \ � / \,,�\ I I , / , / I \ / I I \ -- \ -- / , ,----` 'r / I i 11 � -- / / .- / / /l/ " , " -7_-, 'i / \, .-----_-/ I- \ I �-11- - 1---1 - - � / I I / I -- I , .�-I /;; I i � �-, � �\ \\ -- \ -�-�-) I /�/ I--- ,,\\,, .- -- ,( / �.---\- -141� � // I I / / ---- /-;"+,-,,A`,'-4 --'-�-, I I I"� >/ , ';\ 1, I --- , ,,,�,-I ,I 1, , / ".\ -, -11 )1 / / -- / / 1 i ; 1-- \ 1\ \ -- ,,� 7 j N2 I / I / / - f � i '-�k -'-\ \ -,I,---Z�.--- ✓, , �, / / I , ( I , i� / / X.:�X\ \")\ ; / \1 -_f I -, I 1 / "/ , ,` -f,-' - 11--- 1, 1i '�,--, \\\ 11 ., ,-.--.,- ,I, I------.-,--,-- 1.11 "i / / - -�A I� /) I 11 / ... -r / , // -1.1-.-.-.........", / ,/ 11 I 11 / �, - 1 Ii ! I , 'IN, I- . I "'., -"'�X� -1 1) . " / � �r,I`l k ( i, I - 11)- ) / /I/// " - -11, ./,�' - I-- � ..�- -� I I I , , 'N \ -- , ,\ I I ,-',,, "' , J j w/I - / / AN / A�r 7�',,'" `4, - I ��\ r - / � / - ,,%, :4 -0, , �', I l ( -r, / I'll, I , I I � ,� -1 - , , I I i , fu/1111�1 I j i I 11 N� 1, 3 - / - \/�/ AZ I y i i , - / / I I X ' 'I � -, Z, � \;- / I- I - / ,- -- . / / , t,ouj,,,r,,, - \ 1 i, I I N-1 \1 11 -1 -'- ,-�,-/ -";� -,\ I , , t: �/ ) / 0 -�� ) / / 11 4�11 I I'll, X .1-- I 1 i � " i N11 11 ,� -,-- 11, --_ / (Ay '' / �)\ - " - ---��1. -- I I / lz�141. 1 , , '�," k-,\ - - / / " � / --\ , -- �'�` \ I - / I / " / . I I i / -., 1.I /,, I ill,, 11 ��, - / I -11-t I � \ " - --- . (, / / I -,��,�, I I i I I- -11 /�,4\, / ,0 ;; / I I I/ , / /-- . , /, I 1111 \ -,3, 1 / I ), 't, )� � I I /, \ . I �-I \ I "It"", / \/ ;I!,15 / \ \ \ \I I I \ I I -- I . �'. - ----__--. f--,,J ,,� - /-/ / /--/- /I 11 1,,--,,-,---,T / /\ \ \ \ \ k ,/�1 �- ill 11 I�'.. . -, ,I I � -11 / , \ � I - , �, --jo /\ �- - ,i . � / 'i��h � I , . / 11 "I - - / szltl " , �,. I - ,%,Zz� .", I � , I - / I - " 'Sl- -�1�1 , , \. \ i , - ), \ I 5,p/��'? ',�,W-'- \ \ " I - � -- -.1 -� IT i i "I i I I ./, ( ,-----r,,--4, I / -"`;,, �) \ <P \ -1 I - - - --,,, \ \ \ \1, \ \ \ �/,`Nff/dw- \ f-" I 1� .- 1-11�11 ---I-- , P, --'I� \ / I ,. - I /- - / / 0/7�0141T 7/ / / IF I/ I \ \ \ \I \ \ V, I \ \ - \ \ ,\ I ."\A 111--,.� - I I \ \\1\11111% ;4--4----,-- 1w' `w-----1 -..................... , \ I/ . , '-111 I ,,, ,,- - / I/ �. / \ \ _-A , �-)U f I _ � I �-��-,/-� / / / / ,\ \ \ \ / I ; i \ 11, � �N�--� '---� (' -/, ,."--,K- \ \ \ \\ , \ \ .�,- " \ t I 11 - I ---.--.11--.- -.-I-,--- I I , " 11-1, � 11,41, 1 -..---..--"-4- // \ \ \ " \ 1\ - " it i \ �---) \ , I I I--,- ( / N -- -- ,--- ... / -Y -- ( /I \ , ,��-�, , � j . , . - - - 7------'--------7--T/.....................-F---\-- I : i I 1, ..... I I I II', -✓ - 1�<, � / � - I \ �,, \ \ \ I \ , ///' 11' , \ . \ �� - 1-. V I"A' " /,P/ -----, �- , , I -- / \ \ - " I \ � i I I \ cl.-� 1, ---,:�� --. \ X / -11,1 / �-.� \ ---- I I N , .. I - ""I , \ . I / --.------, I 1i \ \, \ " ) 1, I � - I - --.1--, V11 I \ , \ \ , \ . : L,,,, -- - \--,� ,- ., -1 -111-1 \\ I 11---- \ 1I --- , I <1 I � \ / 1, - , --- I 1 1:_---i ,N\�' --- ' I \", -,-� 11 �I : � ��i I , ,-- "�- / V / / \ , , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1. : I I , - \ '� \ , , \ 1"'. _,�,,--.---. , / / I \ f- - \ '\, \ \ \ \ \--....-- ""- I t $ \ \ I , (.5" -;/'11, 1\,� I " � ,� _ �,�-, \ / I ,-1) ( ., i . I I, e \ \ \ \ \ \ -� . . \ 1�- if \ . <1 \ \ \ \ \ \ I I \ 1�11'-�- '144 \ \ \' - - A,� -- 11 �- --z -, .1, -- I.......__--: .....-I------ \ & 1� I "'..........-.-- 1%�. - 1, - � \ , -- ------� - I , I - -- I ./ . , � "I - - ..��-� , f I , I / / / \ \ / � -1 '�-'- - \C) , \ - 1, -.-/ .. ......-.1.....-'------" \ \ \ \ \ \ " 11-- - .1 �-�� .I \ \ - , I / -1� \ \ I \\-"/, �,- I ,,--,,-,--,,,, \ \ 1�� .. \ , I \ / I ii ; \ , ., I 1I \ I - I , ----� 1-1.1 �,-- - 11 �. .�,-/��_ � /"I�, , "',/ 11 -� /'\ "/ -�, I ,1, , -, . 1%�N,� .../, , o �I \ \ \� I I, \I \ ,I\ /_,�i... - -- �,�-, 1-1- --1 "'' '�'7 -,, r'-�--, �, \ \- -26.5 - - - - -11/ I 11 / ," ; �), \ \ \ � \ \\ � I � 11 IX - ----- ,- , I I ) I \ \ \ \i ) I - - \ \ I I - 11 I 1, I I � ,�,,n� --y \ -� , �, , , T1-- \ , � , ( / / / j/ /I / \ i "\ -)r" I --.,----, I I i / I I 11- ; , ,",� - / � \ I , I' \ \ �,� ) � .. .1 ; ."w.» -� I . I ,/ , ,`1i I I , I \ \ 4 f1p,11 I .1/ \ 1. \ —---1.1 —1 --— I , , j{p,},,}� ,,�--'.,� . �, '�� ! -� __, A \,(,v , . \ � I I 1 41 "I 1. , —111 , I \ . IJL\.—tlfN 1 1 ,,, .— -- ----6-------'� i , —" I I � I'll, , . . ,-".—— ,.-/ 4 Z' ,—i� I I I '�, ... .I— "I tw- / I \ " ! I 1\ k \ \ 'V �, % , � , I ,.—,—. 11 11 I / / X i, ,/, . \ - - �, \ \ -- 11 11, - � , —— -------�/ °'^"" — 11 �, , I I \ \ � , ", I- 1'%��,, I 1, .7.," I ..", \ I-- --- N 41JA", '�11 I-- Ie . / / 1\ I \ \ , C*t! , - I I I 1) � I I \ I I -,--r, , -- -� I "n 1 1 1 1 \ I I I I \ \\ \ , I., `111�, �,,/I ,�" \ \ - / 11 1)" N i I I "\,\\\\\ -----, \ I . I I--,--- " I \ I 11 I � f e- fI - \ \ \\ \ \ -%�l I" \ � 1111111111 . : I �v , -,--' , � \ \ \ \ \, -- - \ \ --- ,,, 1'\ , (��, 1-11 I , I \\% 111.-- I - -11, \\ , \ \\ ,--. I t 1,Ie / /I I I �,-,:--- \ \ - \ I I I \I I I- ( (-) , , -, ,I / "-I' ii I 20 0 20 40 / ) \ ,--- \ \ \ �, \1 1; 11 j // -/5 --- -- I \ \ \ , \ - \ 1, I ','� , I / / / / / \ - \ \ - , /I -- � \ --- \ \\ \ 11" 11 I k\ / 'I( / / i ,I -\ \ I\ I -,�/ f.--. i 1, , I I / I I Al , I/ \ \ \ -�', \ \\ . , �,I I \ \ / 1i -- � ,---,, l - SCALE: I"= 20' / "� \1 \� �, '\ 11, \\ \ \'� I--- ,,-, �� 11 f- >/ I / "' ; I - -41V*, / \ I I �1. w , I I \ : / / " � I I " "I \- \ \ 1. , ,; , ---.7 -1 / 11 11 / / I i ,? r J-.\ \\ .dgn / , / 11 - , "�, -11, / . 11 - \ \ - 1, t "'� '� \ \ -, ,e 0 � - \ \ -,- '�N "., r,��-�, -. t,5, ....... - \ , , - , , - -- I - I I \ I 1,1�,�,,, i�,—* 11 / / / ".I \ )r, k \ , 1. - 11"'I-�----",N, ;\ r), I I / , / I/ I \ $? 1\ ...--1 \ \, `, N�l � , \ 5'. -51,11 : Q) / ....� 1- I I " I- . / 40 . , , . \ / �1 41 Sequin Drive . 11 \:\,\ -,�\--' 1. --- �\ --- -- -,. � I\ \ \- ------- I--,- -11Z 11 /� 1, I , " Glastonbury, CT 06033 \ "', -- I � � , 1-1 ,,�,,�� A C "r Y 0 -ff'% I"' ,\ I - 1\ � 1-"- \ � , I .I I I A N `-4 ri Phone:(860)633-8770 , / / -11 Z1111\ \l-,-11-1-11 ;,\11 , *%, ....... -I'll -11 - 1-� I // / // I // r4�>-e- I1)1%�, ,,, / 11-1. - --11I ",�, 11 / / ",�I -�.......... I.......I'll- 111-11....I , / / - I A - , \ I, , - - I / : �/� 11 I I KX I / / 11 I \ --1 I" \ 11 -I nl)r � i 11 . / I I / 11 Fax: (860)633-5971 i I � I \ \ I 11-1 --� I"N ,\."', , /- , , ENGINEERING SERVICES. INC. I I // " I \,\I \ -, -,-- --..I.......-I-1-1. - --jIII "11, "-,,, I — 1-- \ \1 \ --- --- -,-" i i ,I, i // � 1) / // I �' \ I'll . www.anchorengr.com ' ,f ,,�,). 1. / F-1 I 1�1 - - % I I / -- ,, 6-,�,Z-, 1--� \ \ - -.-,.- -- I.' ,11 �' I I N I I %.If -� -17-1r"Ir, \ - - ,rl, ' ,, , - / �-- I , I , \1-1." --, , ." , I --'11�11 \ � \ I \ , -.1 �� \ , . �,� i / -, - ,�",rf,,,�,,`-,� -,- ,�,q , - Civil Enginocring * Env,c>nmen�ai consuiting 0 Land 1�u�veyif)q 0 consi,ruction management , i-- I \ -1 --I- I z -\1'.K-'i - j, ,,\- , "k \ \ / / 11 — , � A 11 \ ,-,-, "?,'�, , C�, .1-e 11 - D/�'o[,�j,E / \ -,�4, ,,n "I'l \ --, I �?`.- � / rk-"n- . --- �-. L,__ , i , I" -1- - I/ " , ,i�,,f \, ,-,"- �, \ \ / - , I/rte' .�, - PROD. ENGINEER -- , - , , / " " - I Y-4 4,",--�,'-m 11 / . - MJP i .- ., I , " ) - I , �I-- i 11 .1 --- " "' -, " ,� , I--," -- PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS . _ / \ - -, I ,, - .r_� . iI '. _ , I ,;a `,,/fl/ -1--- -,.- ,:,� ?, I- - \ \\ I -, �'.Y�,-, e`�- � � - - I .-�, .......I % , I, 1"f -1,f,M, ��, -^ " --.-", I / - 11,- .- -- \ \\ � ,W� -t -, -1 I I I / 11 I �,��'V'&-lld I \ \ , - � , 7-� ,,-, / ---- . I--, MNB - - \ 11 ��', - .... , ----- --. ..... ---r- i�7p- \ ,,,og,�,;;;/�---; - --- -- 7-1 -i / � -- - �,I ., " -" -� ' --, - n , I \ / -, --- -- N- 7' . "I �A- - '-', `�J,"; - It I MNB I ! \ el "I' -j�,� , "") --Jy.�: '--" / . , ,p, ,, -- I I. .... ,4-�-, \ �, --� " , \ 11 - .1 I OFFICE REVIEW PREPARED FOR 7> - - -- - i;�,;6-'t \ \ IV,, ,,-I, I/ *1 I ,� I -11 � \ - , ,,, � - -1 -- " � ) /IV �;-,-, , - 1�111 � \ , \ - 11 - - / � "- I V 1"N I \ / �" -,.-.--, -) -----------__ \ *--� '�, \ I '0� , \ \�Y,�0�- I� 1-� , f -,V" / — — - - fl,c�, ,,4�,�,", \ ,-�N?l _,./ / proli/I ,N� K,� ,�P-� \-" , \ 1i ,rlllu,,��. f �, --- --, I I \ " '- .1.1 ---, FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT � � 4 . I I I,-v",� IV"O I. : , - � - ------ , �-'\,----------- --�-, -- � * %, , i - --,�� I \, I -- --- - -/ - i4�- - ,;1,11�. I> -� , , - - , I - "I I --� REVISIONS - : , , . \ �-,, !,��,T- 4 � \ --" ''I � -------- / , , , -, I - I --- .-- I � , � 1, - 11 �----------___ - - �,�-�--- - .11.........- U'v \\ � , - - ,\ -- - ---- -� - \ \ "" \ - -------L� - , ,-" , , --- -- /�- - - 3/2/17 , J, - \'\ \ A , , -- .,� -7/' 1�- ,,, - \ I , ,/,.,� , I. � � , - ," - ,.1 . I� I-�1117, ---- -...------ .1 \ i,� " - \ � " �- � EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL � \�\, �\�.,, \\ -,\\\ \ -\\ ,\ 11�-. " , \ � , \ k -�-, \ - I \\I�- " , -`�\, , I \ I I 'I, , 011, \ 1,/ I/ I-` - //1 `f �r//� �\ \ ,\ * \ \ \\ --\1 \ ) �� \,\x - \ ), -\�,- \\ "� )) I \ --- \ I- \ I �11 \ \ , - - , I \ ) , \ I\\`\'\,\" - - -\- --I,--, ) �N�\\\\\-,)--,\ -" , , /-�-4��", I \ ' '- '6E;\ \1 I \ ' �� _,,�-) 11 �, \ � , \ \/\O " , 1-`\\-�\11 -7 , --N , " , , _ , ,� , V� , , ,-��, �, \ \\ \\, z 1-4,�: Y , �\\- 1\�\ , , X- "' -, , - ", / , - I -I- -- "\ `,\\\\\`--1-\1\11 I-----\----,-�-`1 . I . \, \ : )"�-�) 5/24/17 1 \ \ i \ \ i - - - -------- I,- -\- \ � / \ '\\ - , � -- ...-1- ---.--. '�, 1-� - � \ s , I \ I I - — I I i --,��-� -\ \ , \ I I � , � .. - --1 -- — -.- - FISHERS ISLAND, NY 1 . \ \ I .11 - , , i \ ", W101 -- N , . , 1- I � 1, \ \ " � op ------ ...( ,- 11 WHISTLER AVENUE ', �r�-/I/�n, \ , - " ,% '7�—�,f -r� I I� I I \ / ,� - � oe -- , , - �� 1 lil*lr)�,-----,I-- I-I-- -i " \ 1, \ - - 11 \ / \11�, ,1�- ---- � 00 I- - ,- - -----�---'� J fA ', -- L) PROJECT DATE ---,.,.- -I ;-, - -) - : ..- f . , \ \ \ \ \ 11 I) �,I " ,-- --_---1`-- , '�- - A,INA � I- I - i -1 , \ \ \ - - --' ---------\" �-, 11-, "'. , �, .� �� --1--,-1-1-,�-- ,��,-r ��, d, ,- - - N%. \ \ "-,�- I ? SCALE: 1"=20' 013-32 11/8/16 1 SHEET NO. 5 OF 9 . ----- - 12" DOCK KEEPER GUIDE LOCK KEEPER TRUSS RODS ORNAMENTAL TOPS TENSION WIRE END CLAMP STC 450i Precast Concrete Stormceptor I F::� CORNER ELBOW TENSION WIRE END CIL MID PLUNGER ROD TOP HINGE (450 U.S. Gallon Capacity) TOP HINGE , FINISH GRADE(TYP.) STRETCHER BAR— r /,-Grade 511 Adjusters To zk FENCE POST L:j 611 FORK CATCH ........ CONCRETE LIGHT HALF HEAVY HALF 9 ROD CATCH ... ..... FOOTING SHALL BE CONCRETE PLUNGER INSTALLED PLUMB 911 Insert Oil Port NOTES: COMPACTED CHAINLINK SWINGING GATE 1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS(RECP'S), INCLUDING AND NECESSARY APPLICATION NOT TO SCALE Outlet See Note 2 OF LIME, FERTILIZER AND SEED. 2. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE RECP'S IN A 6"DEEP X 6"WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12"OF RECPIS Outlet EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH.ANCHOR THE RECO'S WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES .......... APPROXIMATELY 12"APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY L 1 17" 1611 1811 ............ Riser Pipe SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12"PORTION OF RECP'S BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE RECP'S OVER COMPACTED SOIL WRTH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKED SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12"APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE RECP'S. 3. ROLL THE RECP'S(A)DOWN OR(R)HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE.RECP'S WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST .......... THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL RECP'S MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPILES/STAKES IN APPROPRIATE T LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE. WHEN USING THE DOT SYSTEM,STAPLES/STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED 0.D.+12 THROUGH EACH OF THE COLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TO THE APPROPRIATE STAPLE PATTERN. 4. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL RECP'S MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 2"-S"OVERLAP DEPENDING ON RECP'S TYPE. O.D. All 60 S. CONSECUTIVE RECP'S SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END(SHINGLE STYLE)WITH AN APPROX.3"OVERLAP. -------- STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA,APPROXIMATELY 12"APART ACROSS ENTIRE RECP'S WIDTH. WHITE PAINT STOP BAR Inlet Outl Min. nlet Outlet CHAINLIONK FENCE Down Pipe Riser Pipe EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SLOPE INSTALLATION (Removable) 4. , i --------- & POST DETAIL A NOT TO SCALE SEE PLAN FOR WIDTH 48 110 14 NOT TO SCALE 511 If Required NOT TO SCALE 811 Insert Tee Here 8"LOW PERMEABLE SOIL -7 (Tee Opening to Face Side Wall) PEDESTRIAN RAILING EMBEDDED Section Tbru Chamber Plan View 21-011 IN 811 0 CONCRETE ANCHOR 24 T Notes: y I' STD. WEIGHT PIPE 24 M (RETAINED S 1. 4 STOP A- RAIL (TYP.) 1. The Use Of Flexible Connection is Recommended at The Inlet and Outlet Where f-'FPlicable. 24 M 2. The Cover Should be Positioned Over The Inlet Drop Pipe and The Oil Port. 39 M 12" DRAINAGE ZON 3. The Stormceptor System is protected by one or more of the following U.S. Patents: (3/4"CRUSHED ONE) BACKGROUND:RED #57531155 #58491815 #6068765� #6371690. #7582216, #7666303. LEGEND:SILVER 39 M 3.T6- 4. Contact a Concrete Pipe Division representative for further details not listed on this drawing. 11Y411 STD. WEIGHT PIPE APPROXIMATE LIM S OF EXCAVATION STOP SIGN 45 M NOT TO SCALE Y4"RADIUS 6x6-WlAx W1.4 WELDED WIRE 6"CONCRETE FABRIC 60 M APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF EXCAVATION VARIES WHERE SUBCUT IS REQUIRED 8"PROCESSED Emb.Varies(6" Min.) 60 B DRAIN TILE(4"MIN) GRAVEL BASE TOP OF PAVEMENT 1. ALL CONCRETE DUMPSTER PADS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE. 2. ALL PADS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE CURB OPENING WITH THE DETAILS&SPEC:IFICATIONS PROVIDED. 3. CONCRETE SURFACE SHALL BE A COARSE BROOM 'z_ FINISH,TRANSVERSE TO THE SLOPE OF THE PAD. UNREINFORCEID CONCRETE OR L SUBCUT TO DEPTH"D"AS REQUIRED AND REPLACE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED _� 11 LIFT STRAPS 4. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO ASSURE UNIFORM GRADE, STRUCTURAL FILL TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED BEARING CAPACITY AND SLIDING STORM GRA CRUSHED STONE LEVELING PAD FREE OF SAGS AND ABRUPT GRADE CHANGES. (FOUNDATION_��[L RESISTANCE AS DIRECTED BY THE SITE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. ALL STRUCTURAL FILL 9 CURB FILTER (6"MINIMUM THICKNESS) CONCRETE POST IS TO BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM 98%STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. ANCHOR OPTIONAL CONCRETE PAD OUTFLOW NOTES: SILT SACK PORTS NOT TO SCALE 1. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER 2. INSPECT PER EROSIONCONTROL NOTES OR AS DIRECTED. ACCESSIBLE EDGE OF CURB 3. REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN BAG SIGN(TYP.) IS HALF FULL AND DEPOSIT PER OR PAVEME NOT TO SCALE EROSION CONTROL NOTES. CONCRETE BLOCK GRAVITY RETAINING WALL DETAIL L NT 4. REPAIR OR REPLACE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF OBSERVED FAILURE. DUMPING STRAPS FINISH GRADE(SEE GRADING PLAN) 4"TOPSOIL(4"THICKNESS) (SEE GRADING PLAN) SCALE: 1"=11-011 bo BO EXISTING SUBGRADE 1 101-011 MAX. I"x 2"WOOD STAKE L1 INLET SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE STANDARD F-OF, _I 16F-011 SELF-SUPPORTING STALL ACCESSIBLE STALL VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL SILT FENCE FABRIC .... ........ ATTACHED TO WIRE NOTE:ALL STRIPING TO BE 411 WHITE PARKING, STALL DETAILS FINISH SEE PLAN FOR WIDTH TURF ESTABLISHMENT OAD PUBLIC R TACK COAT AS REQUIRED -1 BACKFILL JI I 17; T/ EXTEND 6"OF Ffil N Glastonbury, CT 06033 FABRIC BELOW 1111 1111=�1111:fiill =I III:-- Phone:(860)633-8770 GROUND u ::a NC OR Ll -5971 ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC, 6"DEPTH OF CTDOT 2"STONE www.anchorengr.com ELEVATION SECTION COMPACTED SUBGRADE 'a x NOTES: IF SOIL HAS LOW BEARING CAPACITY PROJ. ENGINEER Mip 8"PROCESSED GRAVEL 1. INSTALL SILT FENCE&WOOD STAKES AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER. PROJ.MANAGER MNB PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS 3"CLASS I BITUMINOUS 2. SILT FENCE SUBJECT TO HEAVY LOADS SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH FARM FENCING&STEEL ANTI-TRACKING PAD DETAIL PAVEMENT(2-1X2"LIFTS) (COMPACTED) POSTS(0.5#STEEL/L.F.). THE MINIMUM POST LENGTH SHALL BE 5'-0". OFFICE REVIEW MNB PREPARED FOR COMPACTED SUBGRADE 3. SILT FENCE FABRIC SHALL BE A PERVIOUS SHEET OF WOVEN PROPYLENE, NYLON, POLYESTER NOT TO SCALE OR POLYETHYLENE FILAMENTS AND SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER. REVISIONS FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT SILT FENCE 3/2/17 DETAILS BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NOT TO SCALE 5/24/17 WHISTLER AVENUE FISHERS ISLAND, NY NOT TO SCALE PROJECT DATE SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 013-32 1 11/8/16 SHEET NO. 6 OF 9 ' W6x8.5 POST NOTES: PIPE O.D.+24"OR 3'-0"MIN. LIMITS OF TRENCH PAY LIMIT VARY SEE OFFSET MAY RAIL ELEMENT B•�� SEE CONN.DOT STANDARD SHEET NO.507-1 (TYPE"C")OR TRENCH EXCAVATION (ROCK PAY LIMIT) NOTE 8. 507-J(TYPE"C-L"),WHICHEVER APPLIES, FOR: & BACKFILL r--2'MIN. A) DETAILS OF PRECAST TOPS SUBGRADE ELEVATION FINISH GRADE-%,,, BLUE WARNING TAPE ° B) DEPRESSED GUTTER DETAILS 5#8"POST BOLT (WITHOUT WASHER) CURB LINE FOR — — — — — — — — SHEET NO 507-K,GRATES SHALL BE GALVANIZED F .�� 7 BLOCKOUT ° ° TYPE"C" I— w N,+ BACKFILL PLACED AND ° I w� I Q COMPACTED IN 12" LAYERS A Q V A 1 yZrr 3„ 1}zr, > tr 27" ZBrr W6X8.5 I �� ( —� r GRANULAR FILL OR w II COMPLETE ENVELOPE OF TOP OF STEEL POST I Km I APPROVED NATIVE O FILTER FABRIC WITH 12 f on I ,. I MATERIAL COMPACTED U I OVERLAP REQUIRED WHEN PAVEMENT / I Zz I 1•--•I _ IN 12"(MAX.) LAYERS p _ �I CRUSHED STONE IS USED OF C.B ZQ ? AS BEDDING MATERIAL. 1 1 I aQ I Z \` �� FILTER FABRIC REQUIRED ° I OU ( < - IN ROCK AS DIRECTED BY p THE ENGINEER 1 I I- - - - - - - - - --� } EDGE OF m O I BEDDING MATERIAL SHALL PAVEMENT _ 3'-8" p w 0.25 O.D. w a � BE BANK GRAVEL(DOT U a aciGRADING C)WELL GRADED - EL O SAND OR%"TO-Ya"CRUSHED L_J DETAIL FFAFF a j \ STONE PLACED AND COMPACTED DETAIL A RECAST TOP i BEDDING IN 6 LAYERS B TYPICAL � MATERIAL 6"FOR EARTH EXCAVATION SECTIONA A 12"FOR ROCK EXCAVATION € -� GRAVEL FILL SHALL BE BANK GRAVEL PLAN 4" IN EARTH OR CRUSHED STONE AS DIRECTED BY 72"IN ROCKPIPE IA. ENGINEER WHEN UNSUITABLE RAIL MOUNTING 6"SPACER(NOT OR HORIZ.SPAN MATERIAL IS ENCOUNTERED WITHOUT CURBING REQUIRED) )OR Y ICK NORMAL FINISHED GRADING, OF ELLIPTICAL PIPE PRECAST TOP GRADING TO BE VARIED w CRUSHED STONE SHALL ONLY BE USED IN HIGH GROUNDWATER CONCRETE UNITS CONDITIONS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER " ADJACENT TO CATCH BASIN I.D.+2'FOR PIPE cr 6'-3" (TYPE"C-L" MAY BE USED AS TYPICAL POST SPACING SHOWN) ADJUSTMENT SPACER AS DIRECTED. UNDER 30", I.D.+3' j REFER TO PAVEMENT REPAIR AND TRENCH DETAIL FOR PIPE 30"&OVER& C — 1'-1" 1'-10" 1'-1" FOR HORIZ.ELLIPTICAL PIPE TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL (WATER) W6x8.5 POST(TYP.) I W' NOTES: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — — — — 1. ALL PIPE TO BE RCP CLASS IV UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 6"x 8"x 14" 2. USE WATERTIGHT RUBBER GASKETS IN ALL PIPE JOINTS. BLOCKOUT(TYPJ I ""- "--V-"""""--' NOT TO SCALE i � III w I I ri WELDED TRENCHING & BACKFILLING 2'-8 a" FABRIC NOT TO SCALE LAP IN DIRECTION ( -- I - v OF TRAFFIC TYPICAL RAIL MOUNTING ir, > MORTAR I I SEE DETAIL AJOINTS ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS: STORMTECH SC-740 CHAMBER SYSTEMS DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC I I C I I SEE I I Z DETAIL"A" MATERIAL LOCATION DESCRIPTION AASHTO MATERIAL COMPACTION / DENSITY 2: CLASSIFICATIONS REQUIREMENT FINAL FILL:FILL MATERIAL FOR LAYER'D'STARTS FROM THE TOP OF THE'C'LAYER TO THE BOTTOM ANY SOIUROCK MATERIALS,NATIVE SOILS,OR PER PREPARE PER SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S PLANS. DRAINAGE OPENING IN 4 D OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT OR UNPAVED FINISHED ENGINEER'S PLANS.CHECK PLANS FOR PAVEMENT N/A PAVED INSTALLATIONS MAY HAVE STRINGENT I WALLS AT OR IMMEDIATELY GRADE ABOVE.NOTE THAT PAVEMENT SUBBASE SUBGRADE REQUIREMENTS. MATERIAL AND PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS. ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF K 4 .. MAY BE PART OF THE'D'LAYER L - - - - - - - - - - - - - � THE PERVIOUS BACKFILL (KNOOCK OU W BEGIN COMPACTIONS AFTER 12"(300 mm)OF "MAX. QFLOW LINE AASHTO M145' MATERIAL OVER THE CHAMBERS IS REACHED. INITIAL FILL:FILL MATERIAL FOR LAYER'C'STARTS GRANULAR WELL-GRADED SOIL/AGGREGATE MIXTURES,<35% A-1,A-2 4,A-3 COMPACT ADDITIONAL LAYERS IN 6"(150 mm)MAX PLAN FROM THE TOP OF THE EMBEDMENT STONE('B' FINES OR PROCESSED AGGREGATE. LIFTS TO A MIN.95%PROCTOR DENSITY FOR WELL N C LAYER)TO 18"(450 mm)ABOVE THE TOP OF THE OR GRADED MATERIAL AND 95%RELATIVE DENSITY w CHAMBER.NOTE THAT FOR METAL B E M RAIL WITH MULTIPLE B LO C KO U TS �z r BE A PART OFF THE C LAYERMENT SUBBASE MAY MOST PAVEMENT SUB OF HASE IS LAYERS CAN BE USED IN LIEU AASHTO M43' ROLLER GROSSSVEHIC E WEIGHT NOT TO(EXCEED FLOW LINE PREVIOUS BACKFILL ABOVE N 2' MIN. 3,357,4,467,5,56,57,6,67,68,7,78,8,89, 12,000 lbs(53 kN).DYNAMIC FORCE NOT TO TO AVOID UNDERGROUND OR L® PROFILE OBSTRUCTI® THIS DEPTH3 BELOW -MAXIMUM 9,10 EXCEED 20,000 lbs(89 kN). DEPTH 3' BELOW THE TOP Z OF THE STRUCTUREo E Z EMBEDMENT STONE:FILL SURROUNDING THE AASHTO M43' z w B CHAMBERS FROM THE FOUNDATION STONE('A' CLEAN,CRUSHED,ANGULAR STONE 3,357,4,467,5,56,57 NO COMPACTION REQUIRED. 6'-3" A tV - LAYER)TO THE'C'LAYER ABOVE. T(TYP.) TYPICAL POST SPACING —� m W6x8.5 PO J�D AASHTO M43FOUNDATION STONE:FILL BELOW CHAMBERS ,� PLATE COMPACT OR ROLL TO ACHIEVE A FLAT io A FROM THE SUBGRADE UP TO THE FOOT(BOTTOM) CLEAN,CRUSHED,ANGULAR STONE 3,357,4,467,5,56,57 SURFACE.2 3 6"x 8"x 14" 31-0" 8" OF THE CHAMBER. BLOCKOUT(TYP.) { I 4'-O" 81 r SE NOTE: ZIII 5'-4" 4,_4„ 1.LE THE LISTED AASHTO DESIGNATIONS ARE FOR GRADATIONS ONLY.THE STONE MUST ALSO BE CLEAN,CRUSHED,ANGULAR.FOR EXAMPLE,A SPECIFIC:ATION FOR#4 STONE WOULD STATE:"CLEAN,CRUSHED, I ANGULAR NO.4(AASHTO M43)STONE". ale2. STORMTECH COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS ARE MET FORA'LOCATION MATERIALS WHEN PLACED AND COMPACTED IN 6"(150 mm)(MAX)LIFTS USING TWO FULL COVERAGES WITH A VIBRATORY COMPACTOR. 1 I I 3. WHERE INFILTRATION SURFACES MAYBE COMPROMISED BY COMPACTION,FOR STANDARD DESIGN LOAD CONDITIONS,A FLAT SURFACE MAYBE ACHIEVED BY RAKING OR DRAGGING WITHOUT COMPACTION LAP IN DIRECTION DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC A EQUIPMENT.FOR SPECIAL LOAD DESIGNS,CONTACT STORMTECH FOR COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. OF TRAFFIC PLAN SECTION A-A SECTION B-B ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ALL AROUND CLEAN,CRUSHED,ANGULAR STONE IN A&B LAYERS PAVEMENT LAYER(DESIGNED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER) rnt5PAY LIMIT MD-B PAY LIMIT METAL BEAM RAIL(TYPE R-B 350) OR IMPACT v �� II \ \\\\' \\\��\ \\C\\ \j TO BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT'.FOR UNPAVED ATTENUATOR W-BEAM RAIL ELEMENT TYPICAL RAIL MOUNTING TYPE P C-L CATCH BASIN (PRIVATE) PERIMETER STONE �1%�\ �o\? � .xD � `��yj� INSTALLATIONS WHERE RUTTING FROM VEHICLES MAY OCCUR, SEE DETAIL A (SEE NOTE 6) �rj `. ''f\\o?\ \. \ f \ �. \ \ �. \ \ �. \ 1(.IL 41(j�f�IIG>ft �f. {III //11��f/.'fh�f (; iclr /i,lr,' rrl�_i�{);�r/II ✓ri C II ffll�J/II ll)�f lI" '/f;•INCREASECOVERT024"(60fOmm),Ir�ff'I� 8' NOT TO SCALE i,_ ,.i–. .�� ..,�� _ (2.4 m) a (450mm) MIN' MAX 1 11 1 11 I I dl I 6"(150 mm)MIN I 11 I 11 II 11 I I I RAIL HEIGHT PE THREADED ROID NOTES: - 41 All EXCAVATION WALL MEASURED PE WING NUTS AND 1" PE THREADED ROD W/WING NUTS PROVIDED FOR (CAN BE SLOPED OR VERTICAL) © ' II I I- 30• 27" END SECTIONS 12"-24".30"&36"END SECTIONS SPACERS(SEE NOTE) s (760 m" FROM TOP OF REQUIRE TWO(2)THREADED RODS FOR ASSEMBLY. CURBING PAVEMENT 2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL. HMI L�IL SEE NOTE 4. --- 11-lli_ -1,11=III_ H I L-1 I L_. I ISI I II''=i I B I I.I 11-11 =I I L l i l-I A .I I I1-1 11=1 111=1 I I-I -Li-1 I I" f=-: - -=1 =1 ""I i-igi-.11 _—{ I _ IDEPTH OF STONE TO BE DETERMINED {1=I ' �11_�f1I I�.. IL...-{I— — I( BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER 6" (150 mrn) MIN 12 (300 mm) — —I 6 I 1111 �IIE i�11 i { _I 1�I 11111, I I I I I I 1 1 I I 1�' I I I I - i t 1=1I I-III-I 1-1 I I-III III III I I "III I,. I I_I I="'=" 51" 1295 num)_ _ 12•(300 mm)TYP 'ttt—TfT—_I rT—(((=�1_]�(_�(=)-ri=TTi .i i—m— (150 mull MIN i I I I (TYP) I I END CAP SUB SEE NO EI) NOTES: 1. SC-740 CHAMBERS SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2418"STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYPROPYLENE(PP)CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS", ELEVATION I A I W I A OR ASTM F2922"STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYETHYLENE(PE)CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 2 SC-740 CHAMBERS SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F2787"STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THERMOPLASTIC CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION GENERAL NOTES: TOP VIEW RIGHT SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW 1. MAXIMUM DESIGN DEFLECTION FOR R-B 350 AND MD-B 350 GUIDERAIL AT THE STANDARD 3. "ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS"TABLE ABOVE PROVIDES MATERIAL LOCATIONS,DESCRIPTIONS,GRADATIONS,AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS FOIR FOUNDATION,EMBEDMENT,AND FILL POST SPACING OF 6'-3" IS 4'-3". DEFLECTION REQUIREMENT IS MEASURED FROM THE MATERIALS. BACK OF POST TO THE FACE OF OBSTRUCTION. PART # PIPE SIZE A B (MAX.) H L W 2. FOR CURVES WITH RADII OF 150'OR LESS,ALL RAIL MEMBERS SHALL BE SHOP FABRICATED TO12" 6.5" 10.00" 6.5" 25.00" 29.00" 4. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSING THE BEARING RESISTANCE(ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY)OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS AND THE DEPTH OF FOUNDATION STONE THE PROPER RADIUS AND GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION. 121ONP (300 mm) (165 mm) (254 mm) (165 mm) (635 mm) (737 mm) WITH CONSIDERATION FOR THE RANGE OF EXPECTED SOIL MOISTURE CONDITIONS. 3. RAIL HEIGHT WITH CURBING SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF PAVEMENT. FACE OF RAIL 151ONP 15" 6.5" 10.00" 6.5" 25.00" 29.00" 5. PERIMETER STONE MUST BE EXTENDED HORIZONTALLY TO THE EXCAVATION WALL FOR BOTH VERTICAL AND SLOPED EXCAVATION WALLS. ELEMENT SHALL R (375 mm) (765 mlm) (254 mm) (165 mm) (635 mm) (737 mm) PLACED FLUSH WITH THE FACE CURBING. ON HIGH SPEED ROADWAYS 18" 7.5" 15.00" IS 6.5" 32.00" 35.00" 6. ONCE LAYEI PLACED,ANY SOILIMATERIAL CAN BE PLACED IN LAYER'D'UP TO THE FINISHED GRADE.MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE SOILS CAN BE USED TO REPLACE THE MATERIAL ROADWAYS(<50mph),6"CURBING BING MAY BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH GUIDERAIL. (>50mph),4"CUBING.SMALBE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH GUIDERAIL. ON LOW SPEED 1810NP (450 mm) (191 mrm) (381 mm) (165 mm) (813 mm) (889 mm) REQUIREMENTS OF LAYER'C'OR'D'AT THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S DISCRETION. 241ONP 24" 7.5" 18.00" 6.5" 36.00" 45.00" 4. THREE BLOCKOUTS MAY BE USE WITH DESIGN APPROVAL FOR ONE POST ONLY. TWO BLOCKOUTS MAY (600 mm) (191 mIm) (450 mm) (165 mm) (914 mm) (1143 mm) STO RMTECH SC-7 ® DETAIL BE USED FOR A SERIES OF POSTS. 30" 7.5" 12.00" 8.6" 58.00" 63.00" 3015NP (750 mm) (191 mm) (305 mm) (218 mm) (1473 mm) (1600 mm) S. COST OF ADDITIONAL BLOCKOUTS AND LONGER BOLT SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BID PRICE PER FOOT OF GUIDERAIL. 635 mm 3615NP 36" 7.5" )25.00" (218 m 473 mm) (1600 mm)8.6"m) (1 58.00" 63.00" NOT TO SCALE ) ( 6. WEATHERING STEEL POST WHEN SPECIFIED SHALL BE GALVANIZED A MINIMUM OF 4'TO ALLOW FOR (900 mm) (191 mm 1"EXPOSED GALVANIZED COATING ABOVE THE GROUND. 7. GUIDERAIL MAY BE PLACED 1 FOOT OR MORE FROM THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT ONLY ON SLOPES HDPE FLARED LARE D END DETAIL 10:1 OR FLATTER WITHOUT CURBING. IF THE RAIL IS INSTALLED WITHIN 2'OF THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT,THE RAIL HEIGHT IS MEASURED FROM THE SHOULDER SLOPE EXTENDED TO THE RAIL. IF THE RAIL IS INSTALLED NOT TO SCALE BEYOND 2'FROM THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT,THE RAIL HEIGHT IS MEASURED FROM THE GROUND DIRECTLY BELOW THE RAIL. EXISTING FACE OF BUILDING PROPOSED GRADING METAL BEAM RAIL D ETA I L (TY E R- 350, EXISTING GRADING A PROPOSED ROADWAY A PROPOSED EDGE LENGTH VARIES OF PAVEMENT - - - -- - SLOPE WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS o — — -- — — — ELEV.18 ELEV.16 � PAVED PARKING AREA <55 � w W w �� j J.\013\32\Design\PLOT_Fishers Island Transfer Station dgn I Err Q A D Z w A I \\ A 41 Sequin Drive 3 Z Z RIP-RAP i �� Glastonbury,12" RIP RAP = � O Q (AS SHOWN J l i e:; fix; Phone:(860)6330870 0 U= ON PLANS) 6"GRAVEL - IIII�I I� 3 � O U ELE�. _ _ _ _ _ ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. Fax: (860)633-5971 _ _ _ DETENTION BASIN SIDE SLOPES SHALL BE MATTED FILTER FABRIC �, m U_ -/ WITH EROSION CONTROL MATTING , www.anchorengr.com VARIES — — — — — — Civil Enl irlr�erin; 0 Environment,'l Con{suiting 0 !_.anti Survcying � C:an:;trt;;t.ic rt Management LAO 12"TOPSOIL COVER _ 6"TOPSOIL(MIN.) �k• ON BOTTOM( OF DETENTION PROJ.ENGINEER MJP BASIN(NO TOPSOIL COVER PROJ. MANAGER MNB PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS SLOPE IN SEDIMENT FOREBAY) SECTION A-A ON PLANS ERE SHOWN OFFICE REVIEW MNB PLAN PREPARED FOR NOTE:SEE SHEET 3 REVISIONS FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT RIPRAP SPLASH PAD PROPOSED ST00" RMWATER BASIN- 3/2/17 DETAILS CROSS-SECTION A A 5/24/17 NOT TO SCALE � � I WHISTLER AVENUE FISHERS ISLAND, NY PROJECT DATE SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 013-32 11/8/16 SHEET NO. 7 OF 9 REPLACE EXISTING SINGLE—HUNG WINDOW WITH DOUBLE—HUNG WINDOWS i PROPOSED 6 STORAGE ROOM 5 PROPOSED FILE ROOM s 4 r�m„r, . mmwa<ai��„�anm�,aaw�a,,,W,�i,. ._.. �,.a-r<a_....,.»<,�m �,,,,a,,,,,,,rn... . w,a.,<„aa�,�,�aa. '..• ,�„- aa,m�a,.<o< a, ma, aaaaa�awa��an.a ...a<a��„ ,�. .an> ,., a OPOSED /�m,�aamrnH��Yn�w>,,.,., » „.na,a Nr...ra ro.a,n,,>;. ... :. w, y ELEVATOR d, ; ,y• t 3 a>3�` , 77 SHAFT „n...��i, <•d�m ,„,,, aaaaw,�,.�,xaamadxa",a„an,a ., -'< . , a 'f 3 gg f +ot I a{% y {{ s G i” L#' 5 5 Lt a- y $ , h , 6 r, �: '•;,t•,.:.zF,,azj rPsrL•h,�'/ �:% "i4»f; mwraa-w�-Qaow�„na .,..an. ws,.,> -w. : ,,•+.y; .. "• awed .mna,w,• ,5,' ..,.:/".:a: {t'�y' s; , < 3 r� rmH„ .n,.,wx r s PROPOSED STAIR ;(j,: .y'?j; 7,.. „....._.. ... ._.,___.._.�_._,._...... .W ........_.__........_._._._.,.,.,_, _._ ....._......_ .,�..___.. .............._......_.......,....._..,,. 3 y + 'r n:t- Y.:;' f. a f-- N rr.3 3 :E P' E ! ; w. i� 7 ,a i CASE LEADING r , ,, ,,:,",:,a• ',;,.•.�.a" h..��•.}i�.+;4,/3i.!L,„H•..y;rajm:n,h•;3";rn.„.. .,tYr,,Y,•..,..'i <iszya•.ri.at aw..•r.+:-. _ nn<, .anarw,,,madr�yxvri,�ar dr,.rJ.Rt�.ad�.r,/RS.,a.„,,Ea'd,,3..,:�/.✓.t..,.wr . :R.•..'r ..eaiaN,�w.R•,v'�,a,.s..a„.Y.,.„.a,•,...«.'wya,r:rav anw.y._Y,w LQ'ak,{t•i,. :+a3,.m-ts:.,£ii:.h.{•tS,r�.,•": ,,Ya.Rvtl'-:aa,:.a.•”,E-?.w a;2asrY.'J,a3..:. .w-�sn,.ff:.r..,s.•.<:,.-..„.-..e,rar,.i..tr3. /,r+4n�.,.rxE.•:...y,"in.;,...'nwt„,:,.., aa6.:ia< s , a,�”.i.%.,'-$vda.:.rwa.8.af.•._,,ac.6.i..ar{,.._ N. ,.a,:...,...d�..'...,,,r�a".Sns>',.;af;E•,wam r ..•n<.y,.s�”gr: .°r <w '.ro.,m.Vir+ro „ .sf'a..„,wa•:..,.,,,-,rAa„,ww+ay.$r;:w-wYg,r .imWYn�,,•<.,..m,f�<rII$,i;,anii„ fsb-.v,•ra',an . ",,:, iS.x3...t3/rAFivby,sa. o •''.,awa�' ,,.sr,.•/as..�;r sif -.�,. r a'wd%�'k"Q•+„ai1%iw' ih/"�«aii'mdrar / wn,a f.,awi�iig3n?�I ,sn"frYY+m a, ,,,ra/mwr,s,.,ai,a,,,ay,ms„wa�aard„namawa+ w• ta,na, rvzzor aqjtaari'i.aYs. x�„'.rwtrsw'ro snro d<-xerllt,oa fa,a• aY. uY{;ar irfia/d'i.-a, aa,+r,w•,•a,i,mry r,dra,ro,a,ro/.,;nd,/•�fdE•as.', y.,..{ w,/d./ia.wwira„vwr awx.Nas rrr„sif ,,vaa,e.�,wn„wrww„„w n ....w.,.,, .. ,..r„nxEY y,r�r/�,...Mrpt`/%i•i EEiL 9/'Y«U2d,wis(Eid nmsdr,d.a dr dwdE�I�tdEI .U m/.y//g4ryi / .4�a�a�_aRvmdr�ory/rmi�d �EI EfE ry� � nio7�a90'g9& wr• •a.,., nn , . H w ,wT,a,/d/H, Odm d ,aiFu/aH,dIadR/rST.•rFLOOR OO, R , ..,.r,<...r, PROPOSED �f, BREAK ROOM PROPOSED DOUBLE—HUNG WINDOWS EXISTING BAY DOORS TO BE REMOVED. BUILDING FACE TO m � m'mdd �,, dd„d��G.pL�gm'sA m�,//Synwra�S d nD Oddd (TYPICAL OF 4) BE RECONSTRUCTED TO ACCEPT PROPOSED DOUBLE—HUNG WINDOWS. NEW EXTERIOR TO MATCH EXISTING PROPOSED D W SO, UB L E—HUNG WIND O{WS SOUTH FACE OF BUILDING SECOND FLOOR PLAN REMOVE EXISTING DOORS REPLACE E b588f'4y;Li44X` ..._.I.. S4iz6E TING SINGLE—HUN G WINDOW WITH DOUBLE—HUNG WINDOWS PROPOSED OFFICE E ISTIN O FICE _. ELEVATORPROPOSED SLIDING SHAFTUTILITY ROOM , PROPOSED HALLWAY PROPOSED STAIR CASE LEADING TO SECOND FLOORE (STING O FOOM ERENCE PROPOSED mwa✓3' ., -%„i,n.a.i,in.^.rad#err,•Rvx:.e,',.{ <,�,,.r' v,•.F�,,,r,Y.,i/+/„w'r},-i r✓6a*. ,<.,v.w,ae rr m�Y ,�, ... ,,,,'dc•r is :wnwadrmwaxr•.,va,n,{ aviat„Y. w arna,...in„as'st;• sEs, r avd„vro' va dEXISTING CONFERENCE RESTROOM REPLACE EXISTING SINGLE—HUNG WINDOWS WITH DOUBLE—HUNG WINDOWS (TYPICAL OF 2) REMOVE EXISTING WALLS PROPOSED 64` DqE�Oii UBL E—HU NG WINDOWS NORTH FACE OF BUILDING FIRST FLOOR PLAN J:\ dgn 41 Se quin Drive E fir Glastonbury, 0 Phone: (860)633-877 0 Fax:(860)633-5971=NG(N*LPIJCSERVICES, INC. www.anchorengr.com Civil Engimerin3 0 Env'ronmeniMl Consulting Land Surveying 0 Construction m anagem rit PROD.ENGINEER MJP PROJ.MANAGER MNB PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS OFFICE REVIEW MNB PREPARED FOR FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT REVISIONS 3/2/17 EXISTING BUILDING MODIFICATIONS 5/24/17 5 0 5 10 FISHERS ISLAND, T I NY SCALE: V= 5' PROJECT DATE W SCALE: 1"=5` 013-32 11/8/16 SHEET NO. 8 OF 9 COMPOST HEAP BLOWER 15' 30' 30' is, AND WATER TANK 12' (TYPICAL) OVERHEAD DOOR (TYPICAL OF THREE) PROPOSED SHREDDER BLENDED/SHREDDED I TIPPING AREA COMMODITY STORAGE o MATERIAL STORAGE AREA I STORAGE OF UMPROCCESSED MATERIAL Ln L 90, PLAN { i i ! , 4f i cq Ln 12' J:\ Agn 41 Sequin Drive Glastonbury, CT 06033 A N R Phone:(860)633-8770 ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. Fax:(860)633-5971 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - ---i__j www.anchorengr.com -- - - - - - - - - - - - - — — — — — — — — — — — - - - - - — — — — — — — — — — -- - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Civil 1:nc*pn,,)erinq Erw'eonrnental Consuitinq V I and Surveying, 0 Ccrstr <:t{onilr,7-ryrm,nY PROD.ENGINEER MJP PROJ.MANAGER MNB PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS OFFICE REVIEW MNB PREPARED FOR NORTH ELEVATION REVISIONS FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 3/2/17 PROPOSED MIXING BUILDING 5/24/17 FISHERS ISLAND, NY PROJECT DATE SCALE: 1"=5' 013-32 11/8/16 SHEET NO. 9 OF 9 EXISTING 8" SEWER LINE o, / \ \� / o I SEWER / / •� N o 0 I m. PUMP STATION _MON. / ,/' / •� o I- '' (FOUND) 0 S;I / Lu o ca aci IE �pp ��. CONTRACTOR I �� Q Q) w dp0 OFFICE// Q 06 C> / / I V J o N/F z \ FISHERS / � E� r W / / V/ � � � N .` ppo ISLAND / \ / T cn > ° c N w ' 1 DEVELOPMENT \ Q i N wcb00 p / % / co 00 �W (L �1p� ` \\ FLOODZONE AE12 CORP. LJ.I /cn M ca N / ( II �"''� °D COMMUNITY Ii..•i./� J CENTER / o F o. — \ \ / 0 J LOCATION MAP SCALE 1 " 400' � \ ' �s�+ • � N/F \ � / � LEGEND THE FOX LANE I \ RESIDENCES PROPERTY LINE ABUTTERS LINE N/F / EDGE OF PAVEMENT FLOODZONE AE11 \ S 69•� O / �\ �p� UNION FREE EDGE OF GRAVEL FLOODZONE X ' / 916l. �� EXISTING 00 / f ^d' SCHOOL DISTRICT 4 / STONE yyq CONTOUR ___ 20 ——— Q / RETAINING WALL ^ \ \ ,�YY'1,-,, r POLE � �y WF# / LIMITS OF FRESHWATER WETLANDS a TF=7.36 y, FENCE TREE LINE °o 41 / OVERHEAD WIRES I I I \ R.R.SPIKE SATELLITE NOW OR FORMERLY / I ' ' ' /I I / //\ \ \ \ \\ \ ,Q• 1 � N/F (FOUND) BUILDING UTILITY POLE -O- I BOUNDARY POINT O DRILL HOLE DIH 101- 01 O z •1 0 °Oo IRON MONUMENT l BIKE MERESTONE ® LL.I CC f`�� N/F <" R=170.60' BRENTAL UILDING WELL ® G � II FISHERS ISLAND _ I r--- WASTE MANAGEMENT �' ` \ L=92.83' M `('nJ WATER VALVE W APPROXIMATE / III "� \ �Z14 +� 0=31 1040 SOIL SYMBOL POLE CHORD=S 39'45 33 E 91.69 R h B HIGHWATER / /// I ' I \ \ / N 6� Ods #43 SLOPES 20% OR GREATER Q RETAINING WALL \ .- J/ 1 ) O (v CONCRETE CON ETE RETAINING 1 I \, \ -°,� Z >' LOOKOUT / J� Oo \\ ACK WA S I 1 D„ \ Q F`,Q Q LL.� W TOWER \ / > PAD i 10" �' / O W oLijI \ \ \ \ \ TREE\ Q Z TREE \ v 14.0 SSE U_ \ '� POL / a W < _I • 11 � 'I / I �� (\�� I \ \ \ r I WIN REE \ O9p1. _E <,:Z' TRES:644.54 15.0 O � —=� gn OWW.6551.92 TRE \ a- Q 2 �ll / \ \ \✓/ CONCRETE �� -"\ \ \\�\\\\ \ \� TR%E^�1 p \ STRIP �-� P \CONC, \ PAD I //� 1 \ \\\ \ \\ i \ c? �a� Z W / > RAF\ �1�\ \��\\ \\\�/ TREE�� -\� POLE \ (RETAINING sp \_ S 14- #49f/ SOIL CLASSIFICATIONSV) PAD \�--�' '� \ WALL �-�-- � \\ � \ ` �\ \_- S r� �\ / /N 1 � / / CuB - CUT AND FILL LAND GENTLY SLOPING CLIC - CUT AND FILL LAND, SLOPING 2 \ ^' ` \ °_ \ /i- GRAVEL / , / Fs - FILL LAND, SANDY > \ MH \\ �-,, \ \l �C'\ 6iT / RhB - RIVERHEAD AND HAVEN SOILS (GRADED V) / �v LIMITS HA TIDAL WETLAND , \ \ (/ \\ I N� �— TF=23.68' \ \\ \ \ 9�?`'\ CURe POLE — DRIVE / 0 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES BY RICHARD CANAVAN PH `I O �w PWS I I \- \ \ I 1 I MULCH 0`L \ \''` w� \ #90 �4 \ / FJ p \ \\ `( STONE / LL� PILES R 1� \ P R�C�NG \ \\\ I / ( I C��6� 43 7.42C PP 2 16---� SIGN J J•6400• r_^ E�ECTRIC \ 6„ ( y I) -�\ \ \ �\ ' I `�iF'\ �`�/ r �-——— cv�` • 1 FW 11.49' METER 16� Qd CHER �,TR 1 M l QINING 1/ /" 22� ��\l WALL AADS �� \ /sEWE�t MH N l I \\� _ I ( \\\ / / yy TF-ill 49' 1 \ MAP REFERENCES — 10 8„ — \ 10" � \ \ � \ \ � ' \ \� � � �\ 9 / _WOOD FENCE A TREE \ CHERRY\I� \ / \ \ \\ \ � \ / U�o�Nc ^\ CHE RY \. STOP 1. PLAN OF A PORTION OF THE FORMER FORT H.G. WRIGHT PROPERTY FOR m 8,. 8" I \ / / \ \ �, 6" �$ ��'/� G� RACE POINT CORPORATION FISHERS ISLAND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, ,NEW YORK TRE a / 10" °� d.A "A TREE \\\ ` / / /\�\ \ \ \ \ \ �� PVC C8 �-.1067 \ \\�✓/ / � ��P// \ ` g _ SCALE: 1"=40' DATE: DECEMBER, 1966 SHEET No. 6 BY CHANDLER & PALMER z v= \\ ✓ R'l vt . 1,� \ 1 CHEF ?Y ' / 3 ENG RS. NORWICH CONN. REVISED THROUGH AUG. 1970 o TREE \ ` \ � \ / �i \ � vvp � 1 ROCKS w 12" \ \_ \ o \ FIRM-FLOOD — o \ �o =�• i /a cA r- 1 2. RATE INSURANCE RATE MAP SUFFOLK COUNTY, NIEW YORK � 10" \6" �' CHERRT\ a \ ( CHI \ I \ l C D00 \� �'� "� RhB / l <`' 1 I ) / 1 / COMMUNITY: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NUMBER 360813 PANEL 18 OF 11026 MAP W TREE%; TREE PILE I CRETE �° 0B \ w \12" 8„ \ \ - l p �O TF=15.22 / \ 18 1 NUMBER 36103C0018H REVISED SEPTEMBER 25, 2009 - o z \\ c \ INV-12.89 o �- / MTREE-CHE TWIN / \ \ ` \ \\\ \ \ �- -_\\\\ \\ \ \ DOOR I PVC �_ No 3. SURVEY MAP PREPARED FOR FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT 2760 - W 10„ ,�°�, �6ERR�� \ \\ \ CEILFNCI STONE 20 1 / l WHISTLER AVENUE FISHERS ISLAND NEW YORK DATE: 07/24/2014 SCALE: > TREE 12" / \ �\ - _ \ \ \ \ 24 81 DOOR SLOPE ��_ ! / / 1"=50' PROJECT No. 2014818 SHEET 1 OF 1 BY CME ASSOCIATES ENGIN \ EERING, w \\ —\�� \ - I CONCRETE �- lu LAND SURVEYING & ARCHITECTURE, PLLC a CHERR'F-- /l CHEFZRY v `�' \ \ \ \ �\ • N PAD ____� `CHERRY 0 w N // \ I NCRETE rtNC 20 / O� ° a N \ \ CHE�Y// 6 \ \ \\\\ PAD I F / W # �� MAPF / NOTES � � ERS ---- � '`- 6, �\'�(- 9 20• L � / _ � Q/ �� \ � o I8" �/ / \ 1 \ \ \ 1 �,P� 32 v P �P \ 1. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED FOR THE PARTIES AND PURPOSE INDICATED o \ �' \ / P / FLOODZONE AE12 / 11 HERR\ / / �/ `\\��\ II \ \ \26\ O 20 �OF,� I HEREON. ANY EXTENSION OF THE USE BEYOND THE PURPOSED AGREED TO Z 12 RON O°J ) BETWEEN THE CLIENT AND THE SURVEYOR EXCEEDS THE SCOPE 0'F THE X " � 1 � o• \ —— \ 30p - WAL PO CHH ENGAGEMENT. CUB \ \ �CHERY \�`�\\\\\ �� 2�\ \ 24\ l� 6\ ` I 26.9 / Q rn 2. IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE STATE EDUCATION LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS 3 \ 1 ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, TO ALTER AN ~ ° �CHEIR ��_,moo �" ' ` 0 \\ \ \ \ \��-✓ I , / ITEM IN ANY WAY. Q CHER CHE��- \ ^\ ' 3. ONLY COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MARKED WITH THE LAND SURVEYOR'S 00 00 00 o o\ \ / ( < SIGNATURE AND AN ORIGINAL EMBOSSED OR INK SEAL ARE THE PRODUCT OF -- CHER -� P ` \o. I ` m c� 1 1 Y � I c� THE LAND SURVEYOR. 0 a' = 0 w ' I ° FLOOD ONE X ° / , / CHEF?R1 �� i \ I Qe / / 4. COORDINATE DISTANCES ARE MEASURED FROM U.S. COAST ANID GEODETIC 0 0 0 _w F \\\\ \\\ \ /1�""\,8 `�\\ __�o. \ \ z // SURVEY TRIANGULATION STATION "PROS" w z z z Y `` • F. I CHERRY `\ I / / � o w Of m 0 \,8" \\_6 TREE T E 1 V / _/ / o o in ¢ w 0 w TREE\ \ \ R `8" TRE_ A -'� \ / -- ABANDONED 5. SITE IS IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK TAX MAP 1000, a m 0 0 u 0 LL N 6?� F \ \ \� `�• /� /� \� \� \ TREE �-/� \-� >\ \ \� / / STRUCTURE SECTION 12, C AINAGE BLOCK 1, LOT 1. \ 10" _10 ° \ 4/11//�//j�y�% 6. TOTAL AREA = 9.33t ACRES. DATE: 04/13/2016 w \ \ / -TR_EE 6 TRE X12" » > i \` \ �70 .� TREE TREE \� // j//�i'�� 7. SITE IS LOCATED IN ZONING DISTRICT R-120. SCALE: 1 = 40 -"TRE TREE QUALITY CONTROL CERTIFICATION / \ z.\. ` 6» * \ TREE �� \ \ X14ij�7, 8. VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88 PROJECT: #2016805 O Y .�� EE \ \ G \\ /ry CHERR GROUP REVIEWED DATE LIMITS OF FRESHWATER l / I i''�—— \ \ \ 1/ TR /moi---��'B / PROJECT MANAGER WETLANDS FLOODZONE AE11 ` \__ _moi \ �� \ \ \ 1 I ( J I � ��CHE //// SURVEY BY RICHARD CANAVAN, PHD, --_ __ \ l I l\ / ?� 12 40 20 0 40 SHEET PWS \ \, \ \ \\ I t ` \,/ f�� ,'�� CHERRY ENVIRONMENTAL \\ 70 \ \ \\\\\ �� _ CIVIL I \ \ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1 OF 1 STRUCTURAL WF —_`\\ -J l / CH ARCHITECTURAL N/F \ \ ` /'J� CHERRY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD \\ FLOODZONE AE10 APPENDIX C ILl Updated Draft:February 5, 2016 Consolidated Facilities Planning Report Fishers Island Waste Management District Prepared By: Project Management Associates, LLC pma PO Box 271777 • West Hartford, CT 06127 860.756.0302 • Fax 866.483.8588 With: ANs"Ony Anchor Engineering Services, Inc. 41 Sequin Drive • Glastonbury, Connecticut 06033-2314 ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. (860) 633-8770 • Fax (860) 633-5971 r ~1 pma February 5,2016 Board of Commissioners Fishers Island Waste Management District P.O.Box 22 Fishers Island,NY 06390 Subject: Updated Draft; Consolidated Facilities Planning Report Honorable Commissioners: Attached is our updated version of the planning,prepared at your request and authorization. This report incorporates: - A summary discussion of daily operations at the proposed consolidated facility, as requested by NYSDEC; - Our most recent thoughts on organics processing; and, - In recognition that the District has determined it will pursue consolidation of its services at the current"compost" site; this version is focused upon that approach. We look forward to reviewing this with you in the near future and receiving your comments and suggestions. Thank you for this continuing opportunity to be of assistance to the District. Very truly yours, David S. Brown, P.E. President,PMA LLC PO Box 271777 • West Hartford, CT 06127 • (860)756-0302 • Fax(866)483-8588 Draft February5,2016 Consolidated Facilities Planning Report Fishers Island Waste Management District Facilities Planning Report Fishers Island Waste Management District Contents Purposeof Report..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background.............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Considerationof Alternatives...................................................................................................................................................2 Summaryand Conclusions.......................................................................................................................................................2 Limitations&Concerns Regarding Current Facilities.............................................................................................................3 Opportunities To Reduce Waste&Increase Compost Production...........................................................................................4 Improvements Considered&Conceptual Plans.......................................................................................................................6 Concept Plans—Combined Operations............................................................................................................................7 PreliminaryCost Estimate........................................................................................................................................................8 Est.Capital Cost;Improvements At the Compost Station....................................................................................................9 Table 1;Preliminary Estimate of Costs for Option A-Combined Operations at Compost Station................................. 10 Benefits of Consolidated Operations...................................................................................................................................... 11 How The Consolidated Facility Would Operate.................................................................................................................... 11 MunicipalSolid Waste("MSW")................................................................................................................................... 11 MixedRecyclables(Single-Stream)............................................................................................................................... 11 Source Separated Food Waste&Other Recyclable Organics........................................................................................ 12 Bulky,Oversized Wastes............................................................................................................................................... 13 Constructionand Demolition Wood Waste.................................................................................................................... 13 Re-Use of Discarded Items............................................................................................................................................. 13 Appendices: A: Sustainable Generation Company Quote of July 17, 2015 (Composting Technology) B: Site Improvement Concept Plans, Combined Operations at the Compost Site C: Concept Plan, Improvements to Existing Building i Draft Februaiy5,2016 Consolidated Facilities Planning Report Fishers Island Waste Management District Purpose of Report This report has been prepared at the request of the Fishers Island Waste Management District ("District")to assist in meeting the following goals: 1. The District desires to modernize its facilities and methods for how wastes and recyclables will be handled in the future and, where appropriate, processed on the Island. Its goal is to maximize the on-Island management of materials and thereby, to the extent possible, reduce reliance upon the Ferry District and corresponding hauling costs for off- Island transportation of waste and recyclables; 2. The District has determined that the most cost-effective means to provide future services is through consolidation of the services it provides to the Island at the property it now owns and which is generally referred to as "the compost site". Accordingly, this report also contains: a. A concept level plan that shows how upgraded and new structures and activities can be implemented at the property; and, b. An estimate of the capital costs of the improvements that would contribute to meeting the goals. This effort is the result of a collaborative effort by representatives of the District, Project Management Associates, LLC ("PMA"), and Anchor Engineering Services, Inc. ("Anchor"). Background Prior to 1990, landfilling was the key method of managing wastes generated on the Island. A primary landfill, now closed, accepted a range of household and commercial waste while another site was used to accumulate appliances and other scrap metals. The so-called "metals dump" on Town property has since been cleaned up. The site owned by the District and currently referred to as the compost station historically featured open-burning of brush and debris. After rejecting a plan to construct incinerators and an ash landfill on the Island to manage combustible wastes from residents and businesses, the District constructed a transfer station in 1991 on property owned by the Town of Southold.Now approaching 25 years in age,the transfer station continues to accept household and business wastes and recyclables. The District's other operation is generally referred to as the compost station; however that site currently provides several functions: 1. It includes a structure which houses the District's modest offices and a small maintenance garage; 2. Brush, logs and yard waste are received,processed and composted; 3. The District uses concrete structures built scores of years ago by the U.S. military as coastal defense facilities. The structures include walls that create a grade separation that is used to receive deliveries of bulky waste materials (construction debris, furniture, mattresses, etc.), electronic wastes, and scrap metals at the upper level by residents, with open roll-off containers at the lower level to receive waste materials, and, 4. It has a small unprotected area where, on an informal basis, residents can place useable items for reuse by others. 1 Draft February5,2016 Consolidated Facilities Planning Report Fishers Island Waste Management District While the District has attempted to steadily adjust its operations to meet the needs of the Island, factors both on-Island and in the waste management industry at large have now combined to support the need for improvements to the District's operations and facilities. For reasons unclear at this time, a decision was made some 25 years ago to construct the transfer station as a separate operation from the compost site (then referred to as the "burn dump".) As a result, the District has continued to operate two separate locations, dividing its staff and the opening times for each. In part, there may have always been two separate operations going back historically to the time when the District operated a landfill and the compost site was used to open-burn brush and logs. However, the transfer station was not designed to handle oversized wastes that cannot fit into the compactors or recycling containers and some of these were historically landfilled. Examples of this material include appliances, furniture and construction debris, all of which are now managed at the compost station. Therefore, the opening of the transfer station also took place at a time when the compost station became a more mainstream facility, handling not only brush and similar materials, but also bulky oversized wastes. Additionally, the importance of the compost station to manage logs, brush and similar materials appears to be increasingly an important function of the District; more so than the open burning once conducted at the site. Consideration of Alternatives During 2014-15,the District evaluated two approaches to implementing needed improvements to its facilities in order to achieve its long-range goals: 1. Improve both current facilities with respective upgrades; or, 2. Consolidate its operations at the current compost site,which the District owns. These options were considered in an earlier version of this report, which included a review of the costs and benefits associated with the two options. After consideration of the information in that report, the District determined that consolidation of its activities at the compost site is the best approach. Summary and Conclusions Following is a summary of the information considered and developed in the course of this effort; 1. It is estimated that between 100 and 150 tons per year of additional material could conservatively be added to the District's composting program with the proper equipment and facilities. This would represent a pound-for-pound reduction in the amount of material shipped off-Island for processing and disposal; 2. The District's facility plans that have been included in this review would, if implemented, transform its programs and the facilities available to the Island's residents and business community. At the same time, it will require a significant investment to; a. Repair and restore the structural integrity of the compost site for permanent use by the District and its customers; b. Implement stormwater collection and re-use at the compost site; c. Expand the organics composting program with a new mixing building and related processing equipment; d. Add a new equipment maintenance building; and, 2 Draft•Februaty5,2016 Consolidated Facilities Planning Report Fishers Island Waste Management District e. Renovate the current office/garage building for administrative and personnel use. 3. The preliminary estimate of cost prepared as part of this review indicates a total capital cost budget of approximately $4.35 Million is associated with implementation of these improvements at the compost site. Consolidation of the improvements at the compost site was previously determined to have a slightly lower capital cost and to also offer other service, operational, and environmental benefits. 4. The biggest cost component of the District's plans is the range of facilities and equipment allocated to composting, at approximately $2.16 Million in capital expense, including an allowance for contingencies and engineering services. 5. The District may be able to obtain some financial assistance for the composting program component from the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation under its "Municipal Waste Reduction and Recycling Program". From program materials: "Eligible projects are expected to enhance municipal capacity to collect, aggregate, sort and process recyclable materials. Recycling equipment includes structures, machinery, or devices providing for the environmentally sound recovery of recyclables including source separation equipment and recyclables recovery equipment." The amount of grant assistance is limited to 50% of eligible costs incurred. Ineligible costs include other aspects of the improvements considered in this review based upon this statement in the grant program language as being not fundable: "Solid waste transfer stations or construction or improvements of solid waste management facilities that are not directly related to waste reduction, reuse or recycling activities." The program has a pre- application process and the District has pursued this program's support in the past. 6. The overall preliminary estimates of capital cost provided in this report should not be interpreted to mean that a single contractor will be performing the work. While it may work out to be that way, it is our understanding that NYS law will require certain bid packages be separately issued by the district. Additionally, there may be certain advantages from further dividing the overall scope of work to better phase certain items and take advantage of the potential for engaging specialty and/or smaller contracting firms. Limitations & Concerns Regarding Current Facilities A review of the current facilities and operations has resulted in the following issues that should be considered in upgrading the District's operations: 1. The District has sought to maximize the amount of materials it composts with the available equipment and facilities. To perform this service, the District uses a shredder, screen, loader and related equipment. However, it does not have sufficient building space to store or maintain the composting equipment and it is unable to process and manage some organic wastes that could be potentially be compostable. 2. The metal chutes and closing systems at the transfer station are or have reached the end of their useful life; the closing system is increasingly difficult for staff to operate but essential to prevent a person from falling into the hopper when the station is unattended. 3. The nearly century-old concrete walls and related structures at the compost station show evident weakness in some areas and there is no available information on the design of the structures. In one area under regular use, rebar is exposed and plainly compromised. Also, Connecticut municipalities have had injuries at transfer stations and fall protection 3 Draft February5,2016 Consolidated Facilities Planning Report Fishers Island Waste Management District should be upgraded with OSHA compliant barriers at the positions where residents place bulky waste and other materials into the boxes; 4. For the first 10-15 years the transfer station was in operation, recycling in municipalities in the Northeast was conducted under a so-called"dual-stream" approach which involved separately handling mixed containers (bottles, cans and plastic containers) and fibers (newspaper, cardboard, mixed recyclable paper). These two streams were then separately transported to recycling plants that received and processed each stream separately. Beginning a decade or more ago, improvements in materials separation technology and collection (the curbside automated cart collection truck) combined to move the industry from that approach and there are no longer any dual-stream recycling plants in Connecticut or New England. Instead, the industry now uses a "single-stream" approach whereby recycling plants accept the two previous streams as one combined truck delivery. Additionally, these new processing lines take in material collected in compactor-trucks, which maximize the number of households they can serve on a route. If the District were able to transition to a compactor-box approach to handling single- stream recyclables it could reduce the number of off-Island truck trips. Unfortunately, the transfer station does not have space to accommodate another compactor box without sacrificing a slot historically used for trash or corrugated cardboard and reducing the flexibility the current three slots provide. 5. The District's modest administrative building has just two offices, no meeting space and no general employee break room or similar accommodations. 6. The transfer station is at low grade and subject to flooding during large storm events, as was the case during Hurricane Sandy. There is no way to effectively change this condition. Further, drainage at the station does not'properly manage seepage from the trash containers; 7. There is no engineered drainage at either facility, meaning that all stormwater from waste handling areas is released directly to the environment untreated. Common and cost effective treatment of stormwater from solid waste operations includes use of a device with oil/water separation and sediment removal. 8. The District cannot use a weight-based approach to charging fees for inbound or outbound material since there is no scale at either site; 9. The District has no way to control the composting process at this time. As a result, the process time is less predictable. There is also no means to introduce moisture into the composting material; essential to managing the biological process. Finally, the compost windrows must be turned regularly to keep the process aerobic and minimize odor production. Opportunities To Reduce Waste & Increase Compost Production The District's current waste management approach'satisfies the need to safely manage municipal solid waste ("MSW"), recyclables, oversized bulky waste, and•compostable wood and yard waste. However, opportunities exist to improve the amount of material diverted from disposal and reduce the cost of the program (such as the above mentioned single-stream recycling). 4 Draft.February5,2016 Consolidated Facilities Planning Report Fishers Island Waste Management District Importantly,the District has an opportunity to,reduce the amount of waste shipped off-Island and increase the production of compost materials for use on the Island. Specifically; 1. The cardboard material that is shipped off-Island is being recycled,however at considerable cost. The Island generates approximately 50 tons/year of corrugated .cardboard, which has a net cost of approximately $170/ton of hauling and ferry costs. This material could be composted if the District had the ability to incorporate it into the composting program. 2. USEPA and other parties estimate that food waste can represent up to 20%of the MSW stream. The District currently handles close to 300 tons/year of MSW, suggesting that up to 60 tons may represent food waste which remains unrecovered at this time. Capturing and diverting a portion of the food waste produced on the Island would save in tipping, hauling and ferry fees and reflect an excellent feedstock to the composting program. Shipping and disposing of MSW costs the District approximately$130/ton. 3. With a food and fiber-based composting program it is possible that some additional paper and fiber material that is currently disposed of as MSW could be diverted to composting. Examples include the following materials that are likely now part of the MSW disposed stream; a. Pizza boxes b. Paper egg cartons c. Coffee grounds and filters d. Paper bags e. Paper towels and rolls f. Paper cushion packaging g. Shredded documents h. Other similar uncontaminated organic wastes. These streams could be integrated into the Island's composting program with the proper approach to preparing and handling the material. Such an approach would include: a) Having separate bins at the compost station to receive food and organic waste from residents and businesses. The bins should have covers and be set up to be handled with existing equipment on-site at the compost station; b) Installation of a suitable size and capacity shredder to reduce the paper, cardboard and food waste to a size compatible with composting; and, c) Methods to mix the various materials being composted and manage the biological composting process by shortening the time associated with composting and produce a e quality product. i' While an exact calculation cannot be made of how much material can be diverted to the composting program in total, it is apparent that the latest records from the District show the following potential exists: - 46-50 tons of cardboard - Up to 40-50 tons of food waste (assuming a high capture rate)that would otherwise be sent off for disposal in the Preston Resource Recovery facility. - A meaningful portion of the approximately 35 tons now sent off-Island as paper(costing approximately$150/ton net at this time) - An additional portion-of the MSW now disposed of. 5 Draft-February5,2016 Consolidated Facilities Planning Report Fishers Island Waste Management District Based upon the above it is conservatively estimated that between 100 and 150 tons of additional material could be added to the District's composting program with the proper equipment and operating system. Improvements Considered & Conceptual Plans Following is a discussion of improvements considered for the compost site, which have been selected to meet the District's operating goals and needs discussed above: 1. Installation of composting pads and compost heap enclosures with blower control system. For conceptual design and pricing purposes the technology offered by Sustainable Generation has been considered,which is considered well suited to this scale of operation on the Island. Information about the company is located on the web at www.sustainable- generation.com, and the quote they provided to the District is included in Appendix A. There are several advantages of using a system of this type, including(expanded upon somewhat from the company's information): a. Increased process productivity; The system can produce a stable compost in 4-6 weeks b. Lower total cost of ownership; The system has modest capital costs and ongoing operational expenses c. Manage environmental compliance; The system minimizes dust and odor production,which can be present in composting programs; d. Reduce contaminants; Then company's technology(and similar)manages the composting activity within a membrane enclosure. This means that during extreme weather conditions,there isn't any leachate coming off the composting mass and moisture levels are kept constant.Also,the composting material is protected from high winds in the enclosure. , • e. Produce consistent/reliable high quality, high value output; The system features a blower that introduces oxygen to the composting mass,keeping the biological process aerobic. Also,the membrane protects the mass from the potential impacts of extreme weather events that can interrupt the process.. f. There are 20+Installations with+lM tons annual processing in North America g. The system has a small footprint, and is modular. Can be expanded in the future if needed. h. Low energy requirement;the only electrical item is the blower. i. Flexible;the system can process a range of organic feedstocks 2. Replace/reinforce the concrete walls along the perimeter of the grade elevation between the upper level (resident area)and lower-level (working area) and improved fall protection; 3. Locate new chutes and electrical connections for four compactor boxes (MSW, cardboard, single-stream recyclables) and five open top boxes (scrap metal, bulky waste, etc.); 4. Addition of a 40 by 60 foot Maintenance building. For planning purposes it has been assumed this structure would be a pre-engineered metal building; 5. Addition of an 80 by 100 foot building to process and mix organics including corrugated, food waste and similar materials. Inside the building-will be a grinder with hopper and stand to grind food waste, a shredder to process cardboard and other fibers, and reinforced concrete bin wall area to mix organics. For planning purposes it has also been assumed this structure would be a pre-engineered metal building; 6 Draft-Februhry5,2016 Consolidated Facilities Planning Report Fishers Island Waste Management District 6. Purchase of eight small bins to receive source separated organics and for use in the mixing building. The bins are expected to be a mixture of covered and uncovered, and of the type that can be easily moved with forks (attached to a skid steer loader); 7. Addition of a 40 foot scale to weigh single-unit trucks (not tractor-trailers)together with remote hookup and speaker system; 8. Addition of a 20 by 30 foot building for"swap shop"to allow residents to place useable items in for selection and taking by other customers. It is assumed this structure will be a modular unit fabricated off-site; 9. Relocation to the composting site of the existing modular building now located at the transfer station to receive a-waste and other items; 10. Rehabilitation of the current District building by converting the garage area to a meeting room and second floor employee area; and, 11. Associated site grading, fencing,paving, lights and site security and monitoring system. Concept Plans—Combined Operations Conceptual level plans illustrating these proposed improvements are located in Appendices B and C. Appendix B contains a Site and Utility Layout sheet,which provides an overview of the major improvements included in this review.As illustrated on the plan: 1. The existing entrance drive would be improved and widened.A scale would be located near the entrance for use in weighing either inbound or outbound vehicles; 2. Residents would enter the site, and proceed to the upper level to either of the two, new parking areas shown on the plan; 3. The attendant shed would be relocated so that it is adjacent to the parking areas. From the parking areas the residents could access any or all of the compactor area(trash, corrugated cardboard and single-stream recyclables), food/organic waste containers, and the containers for bulky oversized waste items. 4. Also accessible from those parking areas would be either the new swap shop modular building(where usable items can be left or taken by residents), or the relocated modular building for a-waste and similar materials can be left. 5. After depositing waste at the site, residents would continue to follow the access road around and past the maintenance building,to the site exit. This would create a one direction flow of traffic at the site. 6. Collectors and private companies also delivering waste or recyclable material would follow the same inbound traffic pattern as residents. 7. The lower level of the compost station would continue to function as the working level for trucks removing waste and recyclable materials, and delivery of empty containers. 8. The plan and other sheets in Appendix B illustrate the-other related improvements to the site, such as fencing, signage, gate, and drainage system with stormwater collection basin. 9. Collected stormwater and drainage from the composting system would be recirculated and used in the composting process. The following plan sheets are also included in Appendix B: - Grading and Drainage Design - Construction Details (2 Sheets) - Erosion& Sedimentation Control 7 Draft Februarys,2016 Consolidated Facilities Planning Report Fishers Island Waste Management District i Appendix C contains a plan illustrating the proposed improvements to the existing building at the compost station. Concurrent with construction of the new dedicated maintenance building, the existing garage area be converted as shown on the plan sheet to include: - First Floor; a meeting/conference room, office and utility room; - Second Floor; an employee break room, file room, and storage room. Along with installation of new windows in the building,the existing windows would be replaced to match, since those in the building are not the right design for the building materials of construction. Preliminary Cost Estimate This section provides conceptual plans and cost estimate for the improvements under discussion. Most of the Island's residents are well aware of the challenges of completing major construction projects. Unfortunately, large publicly funded projects such as those considered in this review are even more challenging due to additional special requirements that the District must comply with: - Due to size and the public nature of the work, contractors will be obligated to pay Suffolk County Prevailing Wages to the on-site workforce. Some contractors shy away from projects with prevailing wages since it results in pay scale differences within their pool of employees, some of whom are on the project and others that are not; - The work most likely will be done by contractors from Connecticut who will need to not only pay but also maintain NYS documentation associated with the prevailing wages. While not overly complex,this requirement can be intimidating to those unfamiliar with the process. These factors create a barrier to competition in the bidding process by discouraging parties from participating. The last significant public project on the Island we aware of was the school addition that was bid twelve years ago; PMA and Anchor assisted the School District in bidding that project. The school addition also involved prevailing wages and multiple bid packages. Every effort was made to generate interest in the bid packages (including direct contact and special mailing to Southeastern Connecticut contractors) however it was necessary to re-bid certain packages multiple times in order to obtain sufficient interest and a bid that could be awarded. Obviously, contractors doing work on the Island must face the productivity impact of the ferry schedule and costs,which creates another element of uncertainty to contractors that have not previously managed a construction project through to completion on the Island. These factors complicate the process of estimating the cost of construction under a public bid project, more so than what might otherwise be straightforward for a similar project at another site. To reduce the risk factor, an effort has been made to obtain preliminary quotes for certain items as part of this work. This has been possible for the supply of equipment, the modular buildings structures (swap shop and e-waste building), and the pre-engineered metal buildings. Final cost estimates can only be prepared after construction-level plans have been developed, which of course cannot be undertaken until the District selects an option it wishes to pursue. Yet, 8 Draft Februarys,2016 Consolidated Facilities Planning Report Fishers Island Waste Management District even if detailed plans for a chosen project were available,the unique circumstances of the Island and its connection to Connecticut add complexity to the effort of building a construction phase budget. For these reasons, we ask that the District consider the estimated costs in this review to be "budget" level projections. Where possible,this was based upon recent experience on similar projects in Connecticut plus an allowance for"Island factors". Est. Capital Cost; Improvements At the Compost Station Table 1, following, contains Anchor's preliminary estimate of costs for implementing the District's proposed scope of improvements and operations at the compost station site. Under this approach,the separate transfer station site would be discontinued from use. As noted above, while an overall estimate of cost has been provided, the project would be bid in more than one package to comply with NYS law, and to allow the District to phase work and also take advantage of specialty and smaller contracting firms. 9 Draft:Fehruary5,2016 Consolidated Facilities Planning Report Fishers Island Waste Management District Table 1;Preliminary Estimate of Costs for Option A-Combined Operations at Compost Station FISHERS ISLAND WASTE M ANAGEM ENT DISTRICT ------- - - - - - --- -- - - ------- -- ------ --- -- -- PROPOSED SI TEIMPROVMEN_TS__`_-. _ CON_SOOLI DATED FACI LI TI ES AT COM P_OST_SIT_E _ - PRELIM I NARY ESTIM ATE OF CONSTRUCTION COST NOTE:M ORE THAN ONE CONTRACTOR WILL BE INVOLVED UNDER NYS BIDDING REQUIREMENTS CONSTRUCTION ITEM QUANTITY PAYTOTAL_ UNIT COST COST MOBILI_ZATION(5%)----------- T 1 LS -----$177531 $_ 177,531 - - 99NSTRUGTIONSTAKEOUT(150/o)-_----___-,-- TOTAL GENERAL ITEMS ---------^-^_-'------------ ----- - '--- - $230790 _CLEARINGS GRUBBING(ACRES)__ _1 LSS 6000 -S®IMHJTATION CONTROLS(9 LT FB�1Cq -_--- ------_-_ --12_40__LF _DEMO EXISEINGETRU(M RES -0, 60 0T,040400 _ DHN OEXISTINGUTILITYPOLEANDOVERHEAD WIRES1 _S4WCUTFXISTI_NGBITUMINO(JSCONCREfE LF _ $ 5 _$Z000 _-CRUS INGS3RVICEB ON-STEMATERAL_ 1 _LS_ $_ 1,5000 PROCESSED SUBBASE(Road and Pais)__-_ _ 1170_ CY-_$_ 75 587,750 3(41CRUSHED a NE(Bdlmdwil) - _ 130 CY--$-- 75__!$9,750 RIPRAP _ _ _ _ _5 TON_ $ 100 $500 BITUMINOUSOONCRETEPAVING(Ct-ass l) - 841 TON $, 150 __$126,150 -E&S MATTING - - -- --------- ------ -------5 - --$---h- ---520,000 CATCH BASIN(IY I D'CLI-- ---- -_----_ - 2_ EA $_-. 3,100 __$6,200 LF _-ORA INA_GERPEFLA REED ENDS-_ _ _-- 1_EA _ $ 100 _ _ $100 _TOPSOILG-RADINGANDDISTRIBUTI_ON(MATERIALSUPPLI® FIM BYWD)__-i_ 9500_SY_ $_ 3 T $28,800 TURF ESTA BLISHM ENT _-__-- -- ----_-___- 9600 SY_ $ 100 59,600 _ M ETA L BEAM GJA RD RA I L 490 LF _ $_ 35__ S17,150 MASS S(CAVATI ON/GRADING- _ 7300 CY $ 15 ___ $109500 H(OUROF OPERATION SGV 1 EA FAGLITYSGV_ 1 EA $ 250 $250 DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE ------- --------- --- 1-EA $ - Z50 --' 5250 STCPSIGJ ---------------�----- ---3- -- $-------2.�Or------`- $750 _ HANDICAPSGV - _ --__ 1_EA $_ 250 _$250_ LINESTRIPING __-� -^- -1 LS $ 1,000-_-_$1,000 BOLLARD- _ __-- ___-- -- 11 EA $ 11000 $11,000 CONCRETE BLOCK RETAININGWALL 35Q5_ SF _ $ 70___SL45,350 CHAIN LINK FENCING _ 1300 LF $__-35 `$45,500 CHAINLINKSWINGCATE _ 2 LS F?EDESTRIANGJARDRAIL- _ __ - --__-410 LF� $µ_ 100 $41,000 _-aECTRICALIIAPROVE a4TS(3PI-IASES32ul_CE,SITELIG-ITING ETO) 1_LS- $7000 -2NBIVOOMPACTORS&4NEW HOPPERS 1_ LS _ $ 110190 ROLL-OFFS __-- 5_ EA_ S 9.000 54000 TRUCK SCALE___ _ 1 L S_ 75,000 OONCRETE PADS FOR ROLLOFF CONTAI NERSA ND SCALE 65_ CY $--- 600 539,000 STEEL GALVA NIZED RAILING _ 1 LS-- $_ 50000 59000 FIRE PROT�TION STANDPIPETO NEAROCEAN 400 FT- $_ 20 _58,000 MAINT5VANCEBUILDING_4M60 PREENGNEERM METAL BUILDING __2400_ SF $ - 135__W4,000 MAINTENANCE BU ILDINGFOOTINGSLAB _80 CY $ 850 SWAPSHOPBUILDING-20)WWOOD CONSTRUCTION 1 LS $ 21,000 $211000 SNAP SHOPCONCRETEFOOTINGSLAB __ 30 CY _ 5 850_- $25,500 EWASTESTCRAGEBUIrA LDING(Obstofreloinp aastmp building)__________ 1_ LS_ $-__ 1,500 -MODIRCATIONSTOB(ISfINGBUILDING ,___--_ 1600_ SF- $__ 75 SEFfICSYSTBIA MODIFICATIONS_ ,-____,__ __ 1 LS__ $ 15,000 __- $15,000 _MIXINGBUILDING_80X100'PREENGNEER®METALBUIL_DING-__„_---__ _T_8000_SF $ 110 -$880,000 MIXINGBUILDING FOOTINGSAB _--f _ _ 210_CY__ $_ 850__ $178,50D COMPOST HEAP SYSTEM S WITH COVER STORAGEWI NDERS_ 2`LS- $-160,000 5320,000 CONCRETE PA DS FOR COM POST HEA PSYSTEM S _ _ 50_ CY S 600___ $M.000 HEAP HEAT EXCHA NGE SYSTEM A S SUPPLEM ENTA LBUI LDING HEATER 1 LS_ $_25000--_ 525,000 ORGANICSGRINID HCPFER&STAND _1_LS $ 100000 5100,90 PA_P--OCCHROCESSNG/Si REDDER _ _ _ _ _ _ _1 LS--- $ 150,0011 __$150,000 _ PORTABLE HOPPERS FOR ORGA NILS&OTHER OOM FOSTABLES 8 FA 8(1D MONSOON DUST SUPPRESSION SYSTEM FORM OBILESHREDDING_� 1 LS__ $_2500_- §75,000_ PUMP&TANKFORCOMFOSTHEAP 1 LS $_ 10,000 $10,000 PUM P FOR STORMWATER POND _ 1 LS $ 2,50 _$z50 SITE DEVELOPMENT ITEMS $3.550.620 SUB-TOTAL GENERAL ITEMS SUB-TOTALSITEITEMS __$3,550,620 15%CCONTINGE7VCY ANDINCIDENTALITEMS_ -- � _ $_56721155 10%ENGINEERING DESIGN,BIDDING,CONSTRUCTION PHASESERVICES -__-__,( __ _ S__378,141 03 BONDING AND REFERENDUM COSTS TO REDETERMINED TOTAL OF ABOVE �---_--- --------- -- -- --�-- $--4348622 Pm aced by Anchor En meenn Semces Inc 10 Draft Februarys,2016 Consolidated Facilities Planning Report Fishers Island Waste Management District Benefits of Consolidated Operations Following is a summary of the relative advantages of consolidating operations at the compost site: - The capital cost was estimated to be slightly lower than attempting to make the same improvements at both existing sites; - The compost site could be open all hours that either one of the two present sites is open without any increase in staffing. The transfer station and compost sites each are now open only half-days on Tuesday; one in the morning, one in the afternoon. Also, the transfer station is open a part day on Sunday but not the compost station. Under a consolidated plan the facility could add to its current schedule all day Tuesday and part-day Sunday with the current attendant staffing. This would make the program more convenient for residents. - Centralizing the operations may allow an employee now providing attendant duties to begin helping perform composting tasks. - Slight reduction in operating cost. - Ease of managing and supporting operating staff. How The Consolidated Facility Would Operate Following is a summary of how the proposed consolidated facility would operate from the standpoint of receiving and managing key wastestreams: Municipal Solid Waste ("MSW") MSW is ordinary mixed refuse generated from households and businesses on the Island. At present, this waste is delivered to the transfer station site where it is deposited into permanently installed hoppers positioned over self-containing removable compactor boxes. Once full, the compactor boxes are picked up by truck and taken by ferry to a resources recovery facility in Connecticut for disposal. The only change that residents would experience with the consolidated facility is that the hoppers and compactor boxes would instead be located at the compost site. MSW would be deposited into the fixed position hopper, drop into the compactor unit on the box, and then compacted hydraulically in the self-contained roll-off box. When full, the box will be picked up for transportation and disposal off-Island the same as it is done today. Noteworthy, however, is that residents and businesses will be asked to source-separate food waste and similar compostable organics from the MSW stream prior to delivery to the compost site. As a result,the amount of MSW received and disposed of in this manner, would be less than presently handled. Mixed Recyclables (Single-Stream) The District does not currently offer single-stream recycling to its customers since it does not have space at the transfer station to install an additional compactor unit, which is the preferred method of receiving, storing and transporting these materials. At this time residents and the Island's limited business sector are asked to source separate recyclables into three different 11 Draft-Februarys,2016 Consolidated Facilities Planning Report Fishers Island Waste Management District streams; a.) paper and mixed fibers; b.) mixed bottles, cans, and jars; and, c.) corrugated cardboard. These separate streams are placed by the delivering party into the three containers. With consolidated operations at the compost site, recycling activity will change. First, residents and other users will be asked to separate clean uncontaminated paper/fiber materials that can be shredded and introduced into the composting program. Examples of uncontaminated materials that could be separately delivered to the site for composting include:pizza boxes, egg cartons (not the Styrofoam type), coffee grounds and filters, paper bags, paper towels and rolls, paper cushion packaging, shredded documents, and other similar uncontaminated organic wastes. Then, all other recyclables (bottles, cans, plastic food containers, paper, and similar materials) would be received by the District as one, single-stream and placed into a hopper connected to a compactor roll-off box. When full, the box would be removed by truck and delivered to off- Island recyclables processing and recovery facilities. Source Separated Food Waste & Other Recyclable Organics The District will encourage residents and users to source-separate and deliver to the site this new stream of uncontaminated food waste and recyclable organics for processing and introduction into the composting program. Bins would be located at the upper, resident parking area to receive these materials from residents. The District would use on-site equipment to move the bins into the organics processing building on a daily or more frequent basis. Larger deliveries, such as from the two golf clubs, would be dropped directly in the organics mixing building by the inbound truck. Inside the organics mixing building, operating staff would introduce the organic materials into one of two machines, each designed to process a portion of the stream: a.) a grinder will be used to process food waste rich material; and, b.) a shredder will be used to process paper, cardboard and other fibrous materials. Once the organics are reduced in size, they will be mixed with other materials (chipped brush, logs and yard waste) in a concrete storage area. Staff may also add water to the mixture at this point to insure the composting mass is optimal for biological activity and decomposition. Staff will periodically add the fresh mixture to the compost heap by pulling back the cover and adding to the heap. Composting is now conducted in open windrows, which are periodically turned. With the proposed improvements, all composting will be conducted on a concrete pad, and with a special cover system. The pad will have in integrated air supply system and leachate collection system. The composting activity will be controlled through monitoring the temperature of the composting material while maintaining adequate air supply to insure the heap does not convert to anaerobic activity. Collected leachate, if any, will be recirculated into the compost program to minimize discharges. The District has a large mobile shredder to process logs and brush, which activity would continue. The District also has a portable screen for use in maximizing the quality of the final product. 12 Draft February5,2016 Consolidated Facilities Planning Report Fishers Island Waste Management District Bulky, Oversized Wastes This category of waste includes a range of oversized waste materials that includes things like: carpets, chairs and other furniture, mattresses and box springs, appliances, tires and other similar materials. There will be no change in how these wastes are received and managed at the compost site. Metals will be placed in the metals box for recycling and the non-recyclable materials will be placed into containers. Once full, the boxes of recyclable and non-recyclable materials will be picked up by truck and taken by ferry where they will be delivered to recycling and processing facilities. Construction and Demolition Wood Waste There will be no changes in how this wastestream is managed; these items will be placed into a dedicated container for transportation to off-Island processing facilities. Re-Use of Discarded Items At present there is an informal process at the compost site where residents can leave usable items such as furniture, bicycles and similar unwanted items. One of the proposed improvements is the installation of a small modular building that can be used to store and protect these items so as to encourage re-use of items in good condition, commonly called a "Swap-Shop" at municipal drop-off sites. 13 Draft Februarys,2016 Consolidated Facilities Planning Report Fishers Island Waste Management District Appendix A Sustainable Generation Company Quote and Information 000GO e oa. Sustainab8e ° Generation VVWW.s- •- C, July 17, 2015 David Brown Project Management Associates LLC P.O. Box 271777 West Hartford, CT 06127 RE: Updated Quotation for Composting Project Solution Dear David: Sustainable Generation ("SG") is pleased to provide the updated Quotation for the Composting Project Solution for Fishers Island Waste Management District(" Fishers Island") compost project using scalable technology to grow as your business grows. The SG MobileTM System with GOREO Covers is a modular system that expands as your feedstock volume increases. It is a proven solution that is safe, simple, and scalable and will work in the Fishers Island environment. SG can customize this composting project solution to meet Fishers Island's needs. Based on our experience and knowledge of your site, SG could have a system delivered to your site within 8-12 weeks from an agreement. This Quotation is valid for 60 Days. Sustainable Generation proposes a SG MobileTM System with GOREO Covers as the solution at Fishers Island to provide a low cost entry point with the flexibility and scalability for future growth. This solution utilizes On-Floor aeration piping with an Option for In-Ground Trenching for increases leachate control. 0 The system is scalable and can be expanded and upgraded as the feedstock volume increase and more capacity is needed. The SG MobileTM System is configured to process 600 total tons of feedstock per year using the Standard 8-week GORED process (4 weeks+2 weeks+2 weeks). Item Description _ Price SG MobileTM System 1 Heap System: Standard Heap Design (600 TPY Capacity) $75,000.00 1 GORE®Cover (50 ft. length x 26 ft.width x 11 ft.height) SG SmartStartTM Services System Installation Supervision Service Included System Startup and Commissioning Service Included Compost System Training Service Included TOTAL $75,000.00 In-Ground Trench System* In-ground trench with water trap* Optional $6,480.00* Design&Engineering SG MobileTM System Construction Drawings Set Optional Tbd Cover Handling Machine Portable Winding Frame PFW Optional $85,000.00 Wall Mounted Winder WW Optional $72,000.00 ➢ Prices include Duty and Shipping delivered to project site. ➢ State and Local Sales Tax payable by customer ➢ Subject to Terms and Conditions in the formal Quotation *In-Ground Trench System requires concrete pad and leachate tank w/pump to be supplied by customer 1 Proprietary and Confidential Information Fishers Island Quote: July 17,2015 00000� �00000po� ;Sustainable o°O Generation °o • • pp06®Op Our Quotation provides information relevant to the scope of the supply of equipment and services provided by SG for the SG MobileTM System. Customer is responsible for construction. The project requirements and scope of work will need to be further refined as part of the design process. Any equipment and services (such as mixing, screening, front end loader, etc.)not related to the composting system shall be provided by the owner's project team or supplied by others. Sincerely, Brett Hoyt Sales VP Sustainable Generation 110 South Poplar Street Wilmington,DE 19801 Phone: 303.699.1585 Email: brett.hoytna,sustainable-generation.com Website: www.sustainable-generation.com 2 Proprietary and Confidential Information Fishers Island Quote: July 17,2015 ®sse® ®o 0 00o e 0 0 0• Generation o .o 0 •- 0. SG MobileTm System Composting Solution Quotation for Fishers Island ("CUSTOMER") Date:July 17,2015 Prepared by: Brett Hoyt/phone:303.699.1585 /email: brett.hoyt@sustainable-generation.com Prepared for: David Brown Project Management Associates LLC P.O.Box 271777 West Hartford,CT 06127 SG MobileTM System - Standard Heap Design TOTS stLro Ox}gan w CtmPiatm Prcfra arWl Hox 6 BSmmr l 111 li , 5. Mobile System Unit GORE®Cover On-Floor Aeration 3 Proprietary and Confidential Information Fishers Island Quote: July 17,2015 ®oor. so o��ooa• ®o,•• ro i eo�'Sustainable generation o° •o,•o•• c •- • • LEFT: In-Ground Trenching System is Optional upgrade for increased leachate control. A concrete pad surface is required as well as leachate tank and pump. 1. General 1.1. Input Materials and Volumes: Input Materials Green Waste/Yard Waste Food Waste—pre/post Consumer Source Separated Organics Volume:US Units': 8 Week Process Input ton/year: 600 Input ton/month: 50 Input ton/week: 12 Specific Weight[lbs./yard3]: 925 'Data provided to SG by CUSTOMER for the purpose of an agreed upon system sizing. 1.2. Number of windrows Phase 1—High Rate Composting 1 Covered Phase 2-Maturation 0 Covered Phase 3-Finishing 0 Uncovered Total 1 Batch Processing 4 Proprietary and Confidential Information Fishers Island Quote: July 17,2015 �w •o°sii0s°.m• ;iustalnable Generation WVVW ionxoCi 1.3. Heap Design and Windrow Dimensions Standard Heap Design Length 50 ft. Width 26 ft. Height 11.5 ft. Feedstock Mix Recipe Density 925 lbs./ 1.4. Compost Pad: Recommended Minimum Surface Areae Configuration* Total Windrows Length(ft.)x Width(ft.) On Floor Aeration Design 1 130 ft.x 32 ft. 2 130 ft.x 64 ft. 3 130 ft.x 96 ft. In-Ground Trenching 1 90 ft.x 32 ft. Design 2 90 ft.x 65 ft. 3 90 ft.x 96 ft. *Inclusive of Active Composting Pad,Driving Space and room to pull On Floor Pipe and using Cover Winder Machine to place and remove GORE®Covers. Distance Between Windrows 6 ft. 2Layout,configuration and driving space shall be confirmed by the CUSTOMER'S professional design engineer and according to local codes and regulations. 1.5. Cover Handling Method: (Optional Equipment) Item Quantity Description Portable Winding Frame Tbd Tow behind,Portable Winder 5 Proprietary and Confidential Information Fishers Island Quote: July 17,2015 �00 o°°° • °°a•. as°so O's ustainable o Generation 00.6... q ° ° ,°. . • • • °°gym®oo°•® 2. SG MobileTM System with GORE®Covers Scope of Suppler SG MobileTM System with Gore Covers includes the following: 0 Cover LEFT: SG MobileTM System with optional In- Ground Trenching O i Control system \ 2 PC 0 _4 System. 3 Rim weight 4 Temperature sensor 0 f 5 Oxygen sensor 6 Cover handlindevice g y, butt' 7 Aeration fan ra 8 GORB•CoverI. 9 Aeration and leachate system 30 Water trap �J 13 Leachate pipe 0 9]01]'N LGae Uuamiass LmbL G06LQi mCC�6mrcbil•�vkfdN LLmeaAsur.... 2.1 Installation Guide,which includes Specifications and Drawings for the Design Team: Layout and drawings provided by SG are for the purpose of guiding the design configuration and are not to be used for construction.Customer is responsible for construction. CUSTOMER agrees to consult with a professional engineer and design according to local code and regulations. • Basic Site Layout for the Phase I,Phase II and Phase III areas of the composting pad including the push walls,bunker walls,and driving area • Drawings and Specifications for the cover winding system provided. • Drawings and Specifications for the Aeration System • Basic wiring diagrams and power/electrical system drawing to be finalized according to local standards and regulations by a qualified and/or locally certified electrician. 2.2 GORE®Covers Item Quantity Description GORE®Cover 1 Batch Processing Tie Down Straps Included • Cover Perimeter Weighting System Included Proprietary and Confidential Information Fishers Island Quote: July 17,2015 B® ,o Sustainab6e O Generation O pop O D B•moa•°•• Dable • n erati,on.co D°OOq DBBD 2.3 Mobile System Units Item Quantity Description Portable Box Unit 1 Box Housing units for: • Control System • Power System • Blower with Motor 2.4 Aeration System Item: On-Floor Aeration System Per Heap Total Blower Unit with Motor: 240/480v,single or three phase 1 1 On-Floor Aeration Piping 1 set 1 set Cover Perimeter Weighting System 1 set 1 sets In-Ground Trench System(Optional Per Heap Total Equipment,Separately Quoted Line Item)* Trenching for 50 ft.heaps 2 Sets 2 Sets PVC Pipe and Angles 2 Sets 2 Sets Water Traps 2 2 Caulking/Sealant Included Included *In-Ground Trench System requires concrete pad and leachate tank w/pump to be supplied by customer 2.5 Control System Component Per Heap Total Process Control Unit(PCU) 1 1 Oxygen sensor(Phase 1 &2) 1 (Phase 1 and 2 only) 1 7 Proprietary and Confidential Information Fishers Island Quote: July 17,2015 e°°•e ®o:Susta1nab e Generation °000°o• Temperature Probes 1 1 Master Control Unit(MCU) 1 per site 1 Power System Junction Box 1 1 Cabling Analog/Digital/Fiber Optic or RF 1 Computer Laptop or Smart Device 1 Process Control Software Installed 1 Service Platform Software Installed 1 Process Control,Power System and cabling is a plug and play solution and will include the following features: • A Process Control Unit(PCU)for each windrow • Main power supply hook-up • Lockable power switch • Green control light for power on • Red control light for blower fail • Switch for blower manual ON/OFF/AUTO • 24 Volt transformer • 0 NEMA 4x weather/outdoor rated • Master Control Unit—Internet Ready 2.6 Spare Parts 1 Repair Kits for GORE®Cover including laminate 1 3 SG SmartStartTM Services 3.1 Technical Meetings,Site Supervision,Installation Guidance and Consultancy Meeting Description Pre-Design Included Pre-Construction Included Pre-Installation Included ® Operator Training(1,2) Included g Proprietary and Confidential Information Fishers Island Quote: July 17,2015 ®ease o®°e0000• ©•®•eeee•e°o "-tustainab e en10° eo • ° e o,eee••°, www.sustainable-generati °°me®° on.coC 0000:oo Start Up and Commissioning Included Service Platform: Technical Support Training Included Training for Operators Reference Plant Duration(Days) Description Training 1 Customer Site 3 During Commissioning Training 2 Customer Site 1-2 1-3 Months after Startup Consultancy On Site Technical Support No Charge for first 12 months On Site Technical Support $1000.00 per day per person plus travel/expenses CUSTOMER will allow SG or SG Partner to access the plant after reasonable prior notice 4 Operations Manuals • • Installation Manual for SG MobileTM System • Operation Manual on GORE®Cover including safe handling guidelines • Operation Manual on the Control system(O2 sensor,Temp probe,Process Control software,blowers,aeration piping) • Standard operation manual on the Portable Winder machine • All documents will be provided in English on paper 5 SG MobileTM System Design and Engineering-(Optional Service to be quoted separately,if needed. SG and CUSTOMER to define Scope of Work) The design and engineering services include drawings associated with compost facility pad as follows. • G001 Title Sheet,List of Drawings,Region&Vicinity Maps • G002 General,Civil and Mechanical Legends,Symbols • G003 Basis of Design&Process Flow Diagram • C001 Standard Details I • C002 Standard Details II • C100 Site Plan • C101 Grading and Paving Plan • C102 Grading and Paving Details • C103 Compost Heap Sections and Details • C104 Drainage and Leachate Piping Plan • C105 Drainage and Leachate Piping Details • C106 Blower Plan,Anchoring and Piping Details • C107 Blower Plan and Piping Details 9 Proprietary and Confidential Information Fishers Island Quote: July 17,2015 Sustainable Generation • S001 Structural Abbreviations and Symbols • S002 Structural Standard Details I • S100 Structural Slab Sections&Details • S 101 Structural Push Wall Sections&Details • E001 Electrical Legends,Symbols and Abbreviations • E100 Electrical Site,Power and Signal Plan • E101 Single Line Diagram • E102 Electrical Details • I001 P&ID Symbols and Abbreviations The SG MobileTM System Design and Engineering does NOT included: • Ancillary elements outside the compost pad including Tipping Building,or other ancillary structures,storm water and treatment systems,_leachate pump and storage system,odor control facilities and related. • Also,does not include any adjacent equipment such as front-end loaders,ganders/mixers,and screens. • Topographic and boundary surveying to be provided by other. • Geotechnical recommendations to be provided by other. 6 Cover Winding Machine:(separately quoted line item) Portable Winding Frame PWF: • The PWF is a portable machine moved into position by a frontend loader or vehicle using a standard trailer hitch mount. The operator must position the PWF in front of or behind the heap. The PWF is used to deploy the cover during heap construction and deconstruction. The PWF is designed and built specially for the GORE® Cover system for heaps 26 feet(8m)in width and up to 12 feet(3.5m)in height.Upon delivery SG will send technicians to construct the PWF at the compost site and conduct training on operations and maintenance.An Operating Manual will also be provided along with a troubleshooting guide. The PWF meets all California emission control standards and is capable to operate in extreme cold climates. For the purpose of calculating operating costs, it has been SG's,experience that the PWF can deploy a cover for heap construction and deconstruction within a 30 minute or less time period. The PWF requires additional labor and requires the use of cables and pulley and winch system to move the cover. The PWF uses a gas engine. Engine maintenance can be accomplished locally. BELOW: Portable Winding Frame:PWF:For use with GORE®Cover • 10 Proprietary and Confidential Information Fishers Island Quote: July 17,2015 a oa ewe o0 _ Sustdi1"9dbo Generation WWW •- Wall Mounted Winder WW: The Wall Mounted Winder(WW)is similar to the Portable Winding Frame except that it is not on wheels,but rather attaches to push-wall of the heap or support beam mounted. It uses a track and rail system to move the unit into position. A cable,pulley and winch system is used to deploy or uncover a heap in less than 30 minutes. Upon delivery SG will send technicians to construct the PWF at the compost site and conduct training on operations and maintenance.An Operating Manual will also be provided along with a troubleshooting guide. A Above: Wall Mounted Winder(WW):For use with GORE®Cover 1. CUSTOMER Responsibilities Customer is responsible for construction and installation. CUSTOMER agrees to consult with a professional engineer and design according to local code and regulations. 7.1 Installation Supply: • Provide a staging area for shipping containers and unloading the equipment into a secure and dry area(housing for the control system,space for the other parts). • Provide workspace and lay-down area for the partner companies including communication(telephone,fax and internet). • Provide access to standard hand tools(wrenches,hammers,screwdrivers,drill etc.)and temporary power • Provide front-end loader,forklift,crane and trained equipment operators. • Note:The Container holding the cover winder machine has to be unloaded to the ground without being opened or any parts removed.Container shall only be opened by SG or SG partner. 7.2 Site Construction,Installations,and Parts provided by CUSTOMER: • Site preparation as per permit requirements adapted to local specifications. • All concrete,mechanical,electrical work for construction and installation of compost pad,bunkers,push walls,and electrical power. 11 Proprietary and Confidential Information Fishers Island Quote: July 17,2015 eo; ustairlable Generati®n •o°o°ao • Installation of aeration system,including all relevant parts such as trenches,individual blowers and water traps,pipe, and fittings. • Facility shall adequate space for reception,storage,pre-treatment,mixing,screening and storage of the finished compost. • Impervious Surface for Compost Pad. Concrete,asphalt,or other SG approved surface. 7.3 Electrical Installations provided by CUSTOMER: • All electrical installations like electrical conduit,wiring,relays,starters,disconnects and final power hook-up to the Process Controller and Junction box and to the blowers to be provided and installed by CUSTOMER by a qualified and/or locally certified electrician. • Note:Installation of low voltage installations(control cable,data cable,probe cable)will be provided by SG or SG partner during Commissioning. 7.4 Process Supply by CUSTOMER: • Feedstock as specified for the start-up and the process • Provide machinery such as front-end loader,grinder,screen,turner and water supply. • A site supervisor and a main contact person to be provided by CUSTOMER,being knowledgeable about and held accountable for the operations being in compliance with all applicable safety and environmental regulations. 8. Terms ® 8.1 Confidentiality The content of this quotation and all other information in conjunction with SG MobileTM System with Interval Timer with GORE® Covers and its system components,which has been disclosed or will be disclosed by SG,is confidential.CUSTOMER may not communicate Confidential Information to third parties. CUSTOMER confirms to disclose Confidential Information to no more than those employees and contractors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for the operation of the Facility or for the evaluation of this quotation.The signing of this contract does not affect any existing confidentiality agreement. 8.2 Pricing - ----- -- ------- -- --------- --- -- - --- -- ---- - - - - — - ----- - - -- - -- ----- --- -- Item Description Price SG MobileTM System 1 Heap System: Standard Heap Design (600 TPY Capacity) $75,000.00 1 GORE®Cover (50 ft.length x 26 ft.width x 11 ft.height) SG SmartStartTM Services System Installation Supervision Service Included System Startup and Commissioning Service Included Compost System Training Service Included TOTAL $75,000.00 In-Ground Trench System* In-ground trench with water trap* Optional $6,480.00* Design&Engineering SG MobileTM System Construction Drawings Set Optional Tbd Cover Handling Machine Portable Winding Frame PFW Optional $85,000.00 Wall Mounted Winder WW Optional $72,000.00 ➢ Prices include Duty and Shipping delivered to project site. ➢ State and Local Sales Tax payable by customer 12 Proprietary and Confidential Information Fishers Island Quote: July 17,2015 •a00000®o• _5ustainable °c Generation ®• °°moomo`®a www.sustainable-generation.coC� 8.3 Payment Terms Requirement Rate Action/Deliverable Invoiced Payment#1 50% Notice to Proceed/Production/Ship Upon Agreement Signing Payment#2 50% Shipment/Installation Commissioning of System 8.4 Time schedule: • SG and Customer will set a specific time schedule for:when,what,in which way Action Items/Deliverables will be received after this contract is signed. • Delivery date to be discussed. Customer will issue to SG a Notice to Proceed/Production;thereafter Customer should allow 8-12 weeks lead-time for the shipment to arrive on-site after receiving Payment#1. 8.5 General terms and conditions The Terms and Conditions of Sustainable Generation(attached)shall apply. All other terms are expressly rejected. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms and conditions of this Quotation and the Terms and Conditions of Sustainable Generation LLC,the terms and conditions of the Quotation will prevail. 8.6 Warranties and Guarantees • Sustainable Generation(SG)warrants that the system as specified in this quotation is designed to process a minimum amount of feedstock as specified in Section 1.1 for a period of 1 year,provided that SG MobileTM System with GORE®Covers was operated in accordance with all Operation Manuals,Trainings and all other relevant instructions or information provided by SG.Warranty will start from date of commissioning or at the latest 6 months after shipment.In the event of claims to this warranty CUSTOMER shall provide access to all available process data. • GORE®Cover Manufacture's Warranty. W.L.Gore&Associates(Gore)is liable for defects in material caused by failure of tensile strength of the GORE®Cover and all GORE®Covers which contain such defects have to be repaired,replaced or performed anew at Gore's option.This warranty shall be valid for a period of 4 years from date of commissioning of the defect GORE®Cover.For any claim to this warranty arising within 24 month of the warranty period the repair,replacement or performance anew is free of charge;for the remaining warranty period a pro rata warranty shall apply according to the following formula:remedial action=[(total warranty period of 48 month—service life reached)_(total warranty period)]x purchase price. • For all other supplies of SG MobileTM Cover system components which contain defects in material the statutory warranty with a warranty period of 12 month applies,provided that supplies were used in accordance with Operation Manual,Trainings and all other relevant instruction. • Any liability as set forth in this section is in each case limited to the value of the specific component project in connection with which the damaging event has occurred. • Under no circumstances shall SG or W.L.Gore&Associates be liable for indirect or consequential damages,loss of profits or loss of business opportunity • CUSTOMER is solely responsible to operate SG MobileTM System with GORE®Covers in compliance with applicable law. • Subject to pricing and terms&conditions as described in the formal Quotation 13 Proprietary and Confidential Information Fishers Island Quote: July 17,2015 Sustainab e ° Generation ° eowww.sustainable-geon.com °°momoa°� 9. Cancellation CUSTOMER may terminate or cancel the Order by written notice to SG. Orders cancelled prior to the issuance of a Notice to Proceed for production and shipment and will be subject to a cancellation charge based on the percentage of work completed.The cancellation charge may not exceed an amount of$25,000.00(Twenty Five Thousand Dollars)in total. Orders terminated or cancelled by CUSTOMER after the issuance of a Notice to Proceed for production and shipment will be subject to the Sustainable Generation LLC Terms and Conditions attached to this quote. 10. Applicable Law;Jurisdiction This Quotation is governed by the substantive law of the State of Delaware,without regard to its principles regarding the conflict of laws.The United Nations Convention for the international sale of goods shall not apply.The parties agree to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and the courts of the State of Delaware for the resolution of any litigation relating to this Agreement. • 14 Proprietary and Confidential Information Fishers Island Quote: July 17,2015 e °•'0't•°'ao•ien�s e,G,io 0 ''Useaboeatin ° °°•° °°o.00a.°°° V - - - -- - -- - I - - -- - OCI Contract partner and seller is Sustainable Generation,LLC of Wilmington,Delaware. Validity of this Quotation is 60 Days from date of offer. Please return approved quotation by: •Scan/email to: brett.hoyt@sustainable-generation.com •Mail original to: Sustainable Generation,LLC 110 South Poplar Street,Suite 400 Wilmington,DE 19801 Offered: July 17,2015 Quotation Accepted: Signature: Brett Hoyt Sales VP Print Name: Sustainable Generation LLC 110 South Poplar St.,Suite 400 Title: Wilmington,DE 19801 Company: Date: 15 Proprietary and Confidential Information Fishers Island Quote: July 17,2015 Sustainable ••o Generation 0 ° o•m•000a•. °°00000®°o APPENDIX: Sustainable Generation's Terms and Conditions (Page intentionally left blank) • • 16 x..00 .° . Sustainable °o. Gerteration TERMS AND CONDITIONS of Sustainable Generation,LLC 1. AMOUNT AND TYPE OF GOODS Seller agrees to sell and Buyer agrees to buy the quantity and type of products and/or services(the "Products")which are described in this Agreement. 2 ENTIRE AGREEMENT-This Agreement represents the entire integrated agreement between Buyer and Seller and supersedes all prior negotiations,representations or agreements,either written or oral These terms may be amended only by a written instrument signed by both Buyer and Seller. 3 INSPECTION,CLAIMS FOR DEFECTS OR LATE DELIVERY-Buyer shall have the right to inspect the Products after delivery Buyer shall give Seller prompt written notice of any damaged,defective or non-conforming Products and shall make all rejected Products available to Seller for inspection. Failure of Buyer to give written notice or rejection to Seller within sixty(60)days from the date of delivery constitutes Buyer's irrevocable acceptance of the Products.Buyer is entitled to inspect the Products at any stage of manufacturing,but Seller reserves the right to restrict access to certain machinery,processes,and information that Seller deems proprietary Seller shall have no obligation to replace or provide credit for Products claimed to be defective unless Seller receives representative samples of the Products and an opportunity to examine the Products at a place convenient to the Seller In the event that Buyer elects to accept a part of a delivery,it is agreed that the portion of Products rejected shall be returned to Seller within thirty(30)days following Seller's authorization 4. DELIVERIES:The delivery of the Products shall be made,in a single or in multiple lots,as specified in the Agreement,or within a reasonable time thereafter The delivery schedule shall be considered extended by a period of time equal to the time lost due to any delay for causes beyond Seller's reasonable control Seller's failure to make delivery of any item or to meet any delivery date shall not affect future deliveries or excuse Buyer from paying any installment when due Buyer's failure to pay any installment when due shall excuse Seller from making further deliveries. Buyer shall confirm the suitability of Seller's standard manufacturing lead times prior to placing orders.Seller reserves the right to charge expediting fees for deliveries requested in advance of Seller's standard lead-time.With respect to each delivery obligation contained in this Agreement:(i)Tender of a shipment to any licensed carrier shall constitute delivery to Buyer;(ii)Seller shall use its best efforts to deliver in accord with the schedule specified in this Agreement.Any delivery not in dispute shall be paid for in accordance with that order's terms by Buyer, regardless of any dispute as to other delivered or undelivered goods.Seller is not obligated to package goods for outside storage.Deliveries of up to ten percent(10%)above or below quantities specified in the order shall be accepted by Buyer and the invoice price will be adjusted accordingly. Unless otherwise specified by Seller,delivery terms are to be Ex Works(Incoterms 2000)Seller's manufacturing site. 5 TITLE;RISK OF LOSS-Unless otherwise agreed by the parties,risk of loss or damage to the Products shall pass to the Buyer upon delivery Buyer shall receive title to the Products upon Seller's receipt of payment in full for the Products delivered. 6 PRICING OF BULK PURCHASE ORDERS.Unless otherwise agreed by the parties,installment deliveries extending over six months from the original order date will be invoiced at Seller's then-prevailing unit price. 7. WARRANTY:Seller warrants that at the time of delivery,the Products are free from defects in materials and workmanship and conform to Seller's specifications,and,if applicable,acceptance criteria to which Seller has agreed in writing.Buyer retains sole responsibility for determining whether the Products are fit for the intended use,and for suitability of qualification and acceptance criteria Claims for defects must be received by Seller within one(1)year from delivery of the Product on which the claim is based. Buyer's remedy will be limited to repair, replacement or refund for those Products which Seller verifies are defective.This warranty is conditioned upon(a)proper storage,installation,use, operation,and maintenance of the Products,(b)Buyer keeping accurate and complete records of operation and maintenance during the warranty period and providing Seller access to those records,and(c)modification or repair of the Projects only as authorized by Seller. Failure to meet any such conditions renders the warranty null and void Seller is not responsible for normal wear and tear THIS WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE 8 INDEMNITY AGAINST INFRINGEMENT.Seller will,at its expense,defend Buyer against any claim by a third party that the products delivered hereunder infringe any intellectual property right and will pay all costs,damages,and attorney's fees that a court finally awards as a result of such claim.To qualify for such defense and payment,Buyer must give Seller prompt written notice of such claim and allow Seller to control,and fully cooperate with Seller in,the defense and all related settlement negotiations.Seller shall have no obligation with respect to any claim of direct or contributory infringement based upon modification of the products furnished by Seller or their combination,operation,or use.Buyer shall hold Seller harmless against any such claim arising out of compliance with specifications furnished by Buyer.This Article 8 states Seller's entire obligation to Buyer regarding claims of infringement,whether direct or contributory,involving intellectual property rights of third parties Neither party shall have the obligations set forth in this Article 8 if an infringement claim is brought against a party protected from such a claim pursuant to government regulations. 9 CHANGES-Either party may at any time propose changes to the specification or scope of Products All changes to the specification or delivery schedule will require a written agreement between the parties which will,at minimum,include the changes in the scope,delivery schedule and resulting change in price Seller reserves the right to improve and make changes to Products sold hereunder without notice or approval of Buyer,except for changes that materially modify the form,fit or function of the Product contained the specifications. 10. CANCELLATION: Except as otherwise provided in the Agreement,orders cancelled by Buyer other than for default of Seller will be subject to a cancellation charge based on the percentage of work completed as a percentage of the contract price or such other reasonable charge 00000 •o°iii°e• 0 0. o -S s %ioable Generation m o 0 o .°0000•° °®00000 as Seller may apply.Buyer will be entitled to receive any Products for which Seller has received payment in full Seller,in its sole discretion may waive its claim for the value of work in progress Buyer's cancellation request(s)must be in writing. 11 TECHNICAL DATA AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION.Seller has no obligation to provide technical data other than its standard finished Product inspection data.Seller has no obligation to perform,and this is not an Agreement for,research,developmental or experimental work Seller has no obligation to disclose,convey rights or allow access to technical,financial,or other information protected by it as proprietary or to indemnify Buyer for such refusal to disclose 12 PAYMENT:Buyer shall pay Seller for the Products by paying all invoiced amounts in U.S.Dollars,without set-off,reduction or adjustment within thirty(30)days from the invoice date. For each calendar month,or fraction thereof,that payment is late,Buyer shall pay interest computed at the rate of 1.5%per month,or the maximum rate permitted bylaw,on the overdue balance. If it is necessary for Seller to enforce any provision of this Agreement,Buyer agrees to reimburse Seller for all legal and other reasonable costs related thereto,including attorneys'fees,court costs, administrative time,and other collection costs,whether or not Seller initiates court proceedings. Buyer shall also pay all costs,attorney's fees,filing fees,and/or administrative fees in the event Buyer appeals any decision or order from a judicial proceeding against Seller. Seller reserves the right to alter Buyer's credit limit,if any,at any time,or to require payment in full for any order or prior order before delivery.If Buyer fails to pay any invoices when due,Seller may terminate this Agreement and cancel or delay all future deliveries without otherwise affecting Seller's rights hereunder As partial payment of sums due hereunder,Seller may accept any check or other tender of payment without entering into an accord and satisfaction and without prejudice to the Seller's right to the remainder due or to become due hereunder notwithstanding any terms or conditions endorsed on or stated in any communication related to such check or other tender.Seller may apply any amounts tendered by Buyer as Seller determines,in its sole discretion, whether under this Agreement or otherwise.All prices quoted are exclusive of taxes 13. FORCE MAJEURE:Seller shall not be liable for any delay in delivery or for non-delivery,in whole or in part caused by the occurrence of any contingency beyond the control either of Seller or suppliers to Seller,including but not limited to war(declared or not),sabotage,insurrection, rebellion,riot or other act of civil disobedience,act of public enemy,failure or delay in transportation,act of any government or any agency or subdivision thereof,judicial action,labor dispute,fire,accident,explosion,epidemic,quarantine restrictions,storm,flood,earthquake,shortage of labor,fuel,raw material or machinery or technical failure,where Seller has exercised ordinary care in the prevention thereof.If any contingency occurs,Seller may allocate production and deliveries among Seller's customers. 14 REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS.Seller makes no representations or certifications in connection with this Agreement except those which are expressly contained within these Terms of Sale and,if any,those provided separately which are signed and dated by the Seller and made exclusively applicable to this Agreement 15 CONFIDENTIALITY: Buyer acknowledges that the content of this Agreement and all other information provided in conjunction with GORE@ Cover and its system components,which has been disclosed or will be disclosed by Seller or Gore is Confidential Information Buyer agrees to use the Confidential Information only in connection with the use of the Products and take reasonable measures to prevent disclosure of the Confidential Information to third parties The Buyer also agrees that it will disclose Confidential Information only to those employees whom disclosure is necessary and will take the necessary steps to subject its employees to the terms of this provision. The Buyer's obligations hereunder shall not apply if Confidential Information is required to be disclosed by valid legal process,provided that the Buyer shall promptly notify Seller in advance of such disclosure and reasonably cooperate in Seller's attempts to maintain the confidentiality of the Confidential Information The terms of this Paragraph shall survive termination of the Agreement for any reason 16. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: The total liability of Seller for call claims of any kind arising from or related to the formation,performance or breach of this Agreement,or any Products or Services,shall not exceed(i)the Agreement price,or(ii)if Buyer places multiple order(s)under this Agreement,the price of each particular order for all claims arising from or related to that order. 17. SAVINGS CLAUSE If any provision of this Agreement is found to be void or unenforceable,the remainder of the Agreement shall not be affected The parties will endeavor to replace any such void or unenforceable provision with a new provision that achieves substantially the same practical and economic effect and is valid and enforceable. 18. COUNTERPARTS: This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts that together shall constitute one Agreement 19. APPLICABLE LAW,JURISDICTION This Agreement is governed by the substantive law of the State of Delaware,without regard to its principles regarding the conflict of laws.The United Nations Convention for the international sale of goods shall not apply.The parties agree that the US District Court for the District of Delaware or the Courts of the State of Delaware have exclusive jurisdiction over the resolution of disputes arising under this Agreement The parties hereby expressly agree to personal jurisdiction within the State of Delaware SG T&C's April 2014 Draft February5,2016 Consolidated Facilities Planning Report Fishers Island Waste Management District Appendix B Consolidated Facility Plans at Compost Station Site and Utility Layout Grading and Drainage Design Construction Details (2 Sheets) Erosion & Sedimentation Control osroP RAR \ \ m�SEEON �DEAMNR4L \ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \I _ °• >.E 1 CIOMMONICATION SEMCE MP) 1 \ 1 I \ I SF. PIPE / CONCRETE % \_— 4DAY• \\ \ \ \\ NERTMA=ERIALS/ / ' / ``��\ M INTENABUILDINOCE \ \ xa\wIDE CH• NR _� //, — —' / / ♦ �i Aw.:60' 1 EKISTING GARAGE INTO MEETINEi'SPACE \ PADFORiI/SH GRINDEEDOER \\gSjARJi�o1 _ —_—'„ 1\/ PE GROUNDRRUSH le. Tui UTY oo,E \ 1 PEDESTRIAN RD nuOO �•N� REs 1 1 a Ha Ti TcoR:vyRV \I 11 wAI�iD 1 b .k `q ---RwNGw.pD�uE✓ �{oAp� -O tom COMPOSTING\\ \ A EA 1A"EEW ANT SHED \ RE Rn _ IROM EEEST*ASE HSFERST-TOND \ \ HIKING DVILOViG �\ a m \ ` \ ENo MEr�t DEAR RUE \ FIwsMED COMPOST DAO ` O �? COMPS ERDWG ME.SETEP PAD FOR \' \ _ _ 20.30 SWAP ZHOPeuRDING REwSED PROPERTY GNE 5 NIGH CHAIN—PERIMETER—CE PDQ O ANCHOR APPROX—TEUIRTov GR•YRYwALLIOo NG / PROPOSED SI TE IMPROVEMENTS /i Fl PREPaRE wGEMEX.o PRDPosEn PARKING SPACE my of lx) ERSGIA 1—TEMgFOR STRIR sN SITE AND UTILITY LAYOUT REwwvo mNG arrENOANr sHEo nER I,.vo I AN /� roMUNERS Poo opWNlCs eOLLECi10N • m SCALE.1'= w0113x•Y yyyls Teiro ;sN PL st 6o I 1 1 1 1 ee \ 1 1 \ \ I I \\\ IN \ 1 1 1 \ 11 I I\+\ +\ \ i ` i 11 \I 1\ \\\ I it tz \ Do T ET \ \ \ f--� \ \ \\\ \\ \,♦ \♦ \ \ _ 1-50.� nrsousH PAD 11 II I j 1 c."D Fla'li�Ro6u°seio Rt— Feu \`\ —\ \\ \\ ❑ \ \\\�\ I I II I I 1 CO E Ci GIEDWItH saLAND 1 11 Oa \ \�\04 �\— \ \ ` \\ \``../ \� sotLLwwY J�1 I I I lr \ \ 'o' 02 -SON 40 PVC I I 1 I No 1 ` ` L� \ \ MAINTENANCE `I \ 1\ \ �\s 3 t\,� \\ X\ Vs d' Ks INVA9IQ I MEEUI�SPAC _ 93 O 11\ m109A `\\ \\\ �\� \��.. '•.p� ,'�•( \sE'-MOPE \-9G \\ omu.R.io epGp A. r0q ` \`\ COMVPCiE0.�LLED WITN s50R PNDaA rQz t 7 8 O ANCHOR / GINE[a1nG SEav103.1 C e / ,...H PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS r vREPAREo FOR ND w"sTE Ha.-E—T DISTRICT FlGRADING&DRAINAGE DESIGN wwsn ER-I. NY - w S-1--]0 ZSH SInGuD Asx E/sons ENO' '' ''' ''.. .... _ ® _ f, aeaan.a .x.a a...a,.xa.a.a.,a..aaax.xu. CONCRETE PAD CHAINLINK SWINGING GATE a • CHAINLINK FENCE _ _ _ .x...w.,•a.�w. &POST DETAIL EROSION°CONTROL BLANKETSLOPEINSTALLATION wrros... 3'-O' S°•ei s,•u . . v .anzme sr.0 sr°ex ae.r[ I tame nrtx ` ; I wn.us,vavaroea.rwra PARKING STALL DETAILS PEDESTRIAN RAILING EMBEDDED 2'-O'IN B'0 CONCRETE ANCHOR I cwwswtF•stE Sma I I IASTD WEIGHT PIPE I RAIL cTrPl O I IY'STD WEIGHT PI PE .rxws tL�awn° .evvo c uuv.n°x POST @ S'-O"O C MAK siiaxx6vd°�Rnen INLET SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE STOP SIGN TOP OF PAVEMENT xo,rosc.sa PauvrRa N'saM .ecvanrur[uxrts PV[s4vnPxvviFsvmsvE suacuruv[aalvso CONCRETE POST Y H I STOP BAR _ n•c[wrtxswi•u[taxo.ertP ANCHOR (( iii�c'isaawre.s i xo,rR c n suxwurtrwcex[sss ® 4•LmL i I` S .oe xb �. Riorazmtac�isocio�huoiamvsasrumsPorPxioRDsxsm L. P RETAINING WALL DETAIL r nE a l R Ll Ll PEDESTRIAN GUARD RAIL DETAIL ELEVATION ooa .ua SECTION sGLE 1'•1 b• __ _ Y1iiiW'iraWxix�un•etii i�s iixiwueEaoiie�x x sxnsx m.ot tsrs W.axart.w Re rocvnxruttnw+wn.xawul Oe csenRER ax,xE xwv,.crueceaefwnan SILT FENCE kpm i rEx.xra u uxOYS.nI rex••�row�.x.aa xr. — °��`% ©ANCHOR TURF ESTABLISHMENT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ¢weuRe m�sl ><Fx PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS _-FOR RsxDlsaur+P DETAILS� MDlsmlcr FtSIFIS SLA-. olaaz s n°nS svuses,ssa xo,o ,usi iwvms u.xoiw.a. ro°.s Exsv n•®..r �• �_ n J r.e.um.our. «C�af � 4.�.v..u• TOP VIEW RIGHT SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW v,vxr c w,>•,xu°unm .1— SECTION A-A oxwxa sxOW PLAN RIPRAP SPLASH PAD HDPE-FLARED END DETAIL °m.,.°.x ---------� r I I 11 n ,,,. TRENCHING&BACKFILLING xo,ra ••1L E� t I o�l J xoT,o ac.0 uc TYPICAL PLAN m.v.e"owm u,cm .x yi� .x.,xaT— om o ttx uzm q SECTION A-A DETAIL AEay�--___ J WITHOUT CURBING RAIL MOUNTING x ,r„cuv°i�»o •[ 1• � � ] ,rronww,e.c.v.,wx x.nwsusxrarxrt°s° s� ao,mT �,—____ ------—___-4 TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL(WATERo•,rur,v. I ,.nu°.vaxww,ma ,x..r.ow,°.an. „max � c I , e - ----------- - I I I ornx:raom.xc,o. PLAN METAL BEAM RAIL WITH MULTIPLE BLOCKOUTS TO AVOID UNDERGROUND OR LOW PROFILE OBSTRUCTION SECTION A-A SECTION B-B TYPE"C-L"CATCH BASIN(PRIVATE) PLAN A " —i��',- r..wawa,.caun unrtrn wsm, ers : sxro uuu°e sxee*ru.c„vre ,rrexw.r r on�,x slaw . orawx uvrovuroraxswz,°mr,wo m°aou,swr OANCHOR Ml " i ° .r. sx °.n�x �wEEawc ery as °max°PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS ELEVATIONnnED FOR FlSry O GEmErvT15 015T T METAL BEAM RAIL DETAIL(TYPE R-B 350) DETAILS M-TT.- 0-2 e/TDns cTxo 5 ov 6 I \-104 / lbe QnEx FRorEcno _ 1 EROSION CONTROL ELM,REr — -iD '/ / / / 94 © ANCHOR / Go�EERmG SERVIGFSIRC PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS --.—TE-tuGENENi O151RIGi EROSION 8 SEDIMENTATION CONTROL m suLE.i.m b woxc• O 3s ,,sr So Gwx wsns Draft February5,2016 Consolidated Facilities Planning Report Fishers Island Waste Management District Appendix C Concept Plan, Improvements to Existing Building aevucE ESImnG swcLE-xuno wwoow WnH ooUete-HUNG WINDOWS sTORAOE DOOM nlE ROOM �#�`��t�yt"A Lna '4�,ni �. d5 ELREVRTOv �;• � ^ ROPosED STAIR CASELEADING FIRsr noon �'3`I rTTt'��LW�'a�§=a®r-L � BReAN RODN BLE-INNG WINDOWS EASIING BAY DOORSTO BE REMOVE0.BU6DDIG FACE i0 mnuL ov:i BE aecoxsTRUCTEDTo AceEvr vaovosEo DouBLExIUNe wlNDows,xEwFxrERaRTo rwTcx EasnND aROROSED DOUBLExNNa W WDOWs SOUTH FACE OF BUILDING SECOND FLOOR PLAN REMOVE EYBTIN6 DOORS MM—D E EOSnNO SIxOLE-xuno WINDDW vOFFIC! D isn OFFICE y 5 O FILE e6N4RR OIASPS WWDOWING c'y �' kk ,it,•T'r�f•�t j4 {�lY �� YY bNkF� pei�.?t".r #y:ly',5�.'f" Yui �3'i: X r ,�.Z. � •� ( �.{� PRLLWPY V�yy'Y; •YSr, ui;. `r �1: {{i LSA Yk i r —C.. FLOOR MO. SE IEAOd6 sEO co'nRFce caliFLSTIN6 sINGLE-NUNa WW DOW' x o�alBla xuno wwoows mvlcu DF et BEHOVE EYnTIN6 WLLIS RROFOSFD DOUBIExNxG WINDOws NORTH FACE OF BUILDING FIRST FLOOR PLAN NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION O® ANCHOR ENGWEERDW SER•RCESI L e _•^syr PROPOS(D-SITE MP� TS �{t y�+ o�mIa EXIS I�G B IL73T�dbIFIC TIONS L sO^LE�-•s � waLcr vsn EIs AN I+s u-s: e/so/Ls rn ra 6 or 6 WASTE CONTROL PLAN FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT SOLID WASTE TRANSFER STATION & COMPOSTING FACILITY 2760 WHISTLER AVE,FISHERS ISLAND,NY 06390 May 2016 PIFTI%4 Project Management Associates, LLC PO Box 271777 • West Hartford, CT 06127 860.756.0302 f 866.483.8588 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 Introduction..................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Site Location................................................................................................................................................1 Figure 1:Location—FIWMD Facility...............................................................................................................2 2.0 Site Location And Traffic Flow...................................................................................................................2 2.1 Site Access...................................................................................................................................................2 2.2 On-Site Traffic Flow....................................................................................................................................2 3.0 Types and Quantities of Wastes...................................................................................................................3 Table 1:Types and Quantities of Wastes...............................................................................................................3 Table 2:Estimated Maximum Cubic Yards On-Site of Each Waste/Recyclable...................................................4 4.0 Waste Handling Activities............................................................................................................................5 4.1 Municipal Solid Waste(MSW)....................................................................................................................5 4.2 Mixed Recyclables(Single-Stream).............................................................................................................5 4.3 Source Separated Food Waste&Other Recyclable Organics......................................................................5 4.4 Bulky,Oversized Wastes.............................................................................................................................6 4.5 Construction and Demolition Wood Waste..................................................................................................6 4.6 Re-Use of Discarded Items...........................................................................................................................6 4.7 E-Waste........................................................................................................................................................6 5.0 Staffing&Employee Training.....................................................................................................................7 5.1 Staffing.........................................................................................................................................................7 Figure2:FIWMD Organization Chart...............................................................................................................7 5.2 Employee Qualification and Training..........................................................................................................7 6.0 Managing Unauthorized Wastes...................................................................................................................9 6.1 As-Received Inspections..............................................................................................................................9 6.2 Unacceptable Materials Discovered—Delivering Party Not Known...........................................................9 6.3 Storage of Unacceptable Materials.............................................................................................................10 7.0 Signage.......................................................................................................................................................10 8.0 Site Plan.....................................................................................................................................................10 9.0 Safety.........................................................................................................................................................11 9.1 Safety Procedures.......................................................................................................................................11 10.0 Record Keeping&Reporting.....................................................................................................................12 Attachments: Site Plan i FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Waste Control Plan 1.0 Introduction This Waste Control Plan has been prepared with respect to the solid waste transfer station and organics composting facility owned and operated by the Fishers Island Waste Management District("FIWMD")that is located at 2760 Whistler Ave,Fishers Island,NY 06390 The facility is comprised of: 1. An access roadway 2. Elevated locations where users park and deposit waste and recyclables into containers for off-Island shipment to licensed facilities in Connecticut; 3. Shredding and composting equipment and an area of the site used to manage yard waste, brush and other organic materials delivered by users to the facility; and, 4. Administrative and equipment maintenance facilities associated with the operation and equipment used to manage waste and recyclables received at the facility. The facility has been in operation for many years and was historically a coastal gun emplacement established during WWI. FIWMD is preparing to make certain improvements to the site which includes; 1. Relocation of MSW and recyclables transfer equipment and activity to the facility from a second transfer station FIWMD operates that is located on Town of Southold property; 2. Addition of building space for organics processing and equipment maintenance; 3. Improvements to the composting process including controlled aeration of piles. This Waste Control Plan addresses the facility features and method of operation planned to be put in place following the completion of the proposed improvements. 1.1 Site Location Figure 1, below, shows the location of the site on the western area of the Island. To the south of the facility is the airport which is used primarily by private craft visiting the Island. There are no commercial flights to/from the Island. Also visible in the image is the current facility configuration with the access road at the end of Whistler Avenue, and existing administration building and general limit of operating area for the facility, which is not planned to increase. Also visible in the upper portion of the image are industrial buildings used by contractors on the Island. Just off the image to the north is the ferry dock which is used for all vehicle travel to/from the Island. The site location is well suited for the facility operations, given its general isolation from the balance of the Island to the east which is primarily residential in nature. Also, this site is near to the ferry dock and therefore allows for minimal use of Island roadways by trucks removing waste and recyclables destined for the ferry dock, and by returning trucks bringing empty containers. Project Management Associates LLC 1 FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Waste Control Plan Figure 1: Location—FIWMD Facilitv R .,, Facility Location �r f. 2.0 Site Location And Traffic Flow 2.1 Site Access The operating areas of the facility are directly accessed via the entrance roadway on Whistler Avenue. The main access road will have a gate that will be closed when wastes and recyclables are not being received at the facility. 2.2 On-Site Traffic Flow Please refer to the attached Solid Waste Plan to review the features of the facility and in reference to this discussion of method of operations. FIWMD may elect to direct all or a portion of inbound traffic over the on-site scale to be located near the entrance gate. Whether inbound vehicles are weighed will be dependent upon the fee policy that may change from time-to-time. Once facility improvements are implemented, inbound vehicles will then proceed in a clockwise, circular, one-directional route into the site. Users delivering/removing waste and recyclables will proceed as follows [note; some users may be delivering more than one material type and may visit any of the designated areas and access the respective containers and storage areas]: a E-waste, oversized waste (furniture, etc.) or wood: proceed to the first station, park and unload in the respective areas. Project Management Associates LLC 2 FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Waste Control Plan • MSW, organics, or recyclables: proceed further into the site and park near to the waste/recyclables compactors. • Source Separated Organics: will be placed either in a small container near the MSW compactors, or directly onto the tip floor of the organics processing building if a larger quantity is being delivered. • Brush, logs or similar material: proceed along the access road past the organics processing building to the brush/yard waste receiving area where the material will be unloaded. • After depositing waste and/or recyclables, users will then continue clockwise through the site and approach the entrance/exit area. As appropriate, vehicles may be directed to again access the on-site scale before exiting the site. • Users may also deposit useful items in the "swap shop" building, or remove items placed there by other parties. • Trucks coming to the site to remove full containers and deliver empty containers will first cross the scale and then proceed to the lower working level of the facility where empty containers will be unloaded and full containers picked up for removal. Those vehicles will then proceed to the scale to obtain an outbound weight and proceed off the site and to the ferry dock for off-Island transportation. • Trucks and cars seeking to remove compost product may cross the scale and then proceed to the finished compost product storage pad where they will load the material and the proceed to the exit, after weighing as instructed by FIWMD staff. 3.0 Types and Quantities of Wastes The estimated annual amounts of waste handled at the facility relies upon recent records of materials removed from the Island for delivery to recycling and processing facilities. For those items not removed from the Island (brush, yard waste) an estimated generation rate has been used since a scale has not been in historical use. The following table summarizes waste types and estimated quantities. Table 1: Types and Quantities of Wastes Waste Type Est.Annual Tonsl Comments Note: Source separation of MSW (Excluding Bulky) 290 compostable organics will reduce the to shi ed off-Island to an RRF. May include non-wood C&D waste. Bulky MSW 80 Includes approximately 7 tons of mattresses. Wood Waste 150 From construction,demolition waste Household recyclables (glass, metal, Recyclables 160 plastic food containers plus paper and OCC)plus corrugated cardboard from all sources. 1 Where outbound weigh records were,these estimates incorporate that data.All amounts(except for eWaste)have been rounded up to nearest 10 tons. Project Management Associates LLC 3 FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Waste Control Plan Waste Type Est. Annual Tonsl Comments This estimate is on-half the amount derived from 4 lbs/capita/year using the peak estimated population of 2,500 people (Note: year-round eWaste 2.5 population is reported to be less than 250). Actual amounts handled in the past are less than 200 units, demonstrating that the seasonal population does not significantly contribute to this wastestream. Scrap Metals 50 No weigh records exist. This waste is processed and composted at the facility. Estimate assumes 50% Tree Debris and Brush Yard capture of all such waste produced Trimmings 60 on the Island since all private g contractors do not bring this material to the facility. From.234 lbs/capita/day times 2,500 eo le size of housing stock Total Handled: 792.5 Table 2, following, provides an estimate of the maximum volume of each wastestream that may be present at any time on the site. It should be noted that the maximum volume of all items would in the normal course not be realized at a single moment in time. For example, full containers of MSW would be removed when full however the amount shown is in excess of the amount contained in a full container. The same is also the case for other items to shipped off- Island. Therefore, it is expected that these maximums will be achieved individually, but not simultaneously for all streams. Table 2: Estimated Maximum Cubic Yards On-Site of Each Waste/Recyclable Est Max Waste/Recyclable Cubic Yards Unprocessed Brush/Logs, etc.: 150 Processed Brush/Logs, etc.: 75 Brick, Concrete, Inert Materials: 150 Organics in Mixing Building: 75 Compost in Windrows: 250 Finished Compost at Storage Pad: 75 MSW In Compactors: 35 OCC/SS Recyclables In Containers: 60 Scrap Metal: 40 Bulky/Oversized Waste In Containers: 60 Total Potentially On-Site: 970 Project Management Associates LLC 4 FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Waste Control Plan 4.0 Waste Handling Activities Following is a summary of how key wastestreams are to be handled at the facility: 4.1 Municipal Solid Waste(MSW) MSW is ordinary mixed refuse generated from households and businesses on the Island. MSW is to be deposited into the fixed position hopper, drop into the compactor unit on the box where it will be compacted hydraulically in the self-contained roll-off box. When full, the box will be picked up for transportation and disposal off-Island at permitted facilities in the State of Connecticut. FIWMD will use two compactor-box positions for this purpose,which will rotate as each fills up. Noteworthy, however, is that once the site improvements are complete, residents and businesses will be asked to source-separate food waste and similar compostable organics from the MSW stream prior to delivery to the facility. As a result, the amount of MSW received and disposed of in this manner, is expected to decline over time in comparison to historical records. 4.2 Mixed Recyclables (Single-Stream) The District does not currently offer single-stream recycling to its customers since it does not have space at the transfer station to install an additional compactor unit, which is the preferred method of receiving, storing and transporting these materials. At this time residents and the Island's limited business sector are asked to source separate recyclables into three different streams; a.) paper and mixed fibers; b.) mixed bottles, cans, and jars; and, c.) corrugated cardboard. These separate streams are placed by the delivering party into the three containers. With consolidated operations at the compost site, recycling activity will change. First, residents and other users will be asked to separate clean uncontaminated paper/fiber materials that can be shredded and introduced into the composting program. Examples of uncontaminated materials that could be separately delivered to the site for composting include: pizza boxes, fiber egg cartons (not Styrofoam type), coffee grounds and filters,paper bags, paper towels and rolls,paper cushion packaging, shredded documents, and other similar uncontaminated organic wastes. All other recyclables (bottles, cans, plastic food containers, paper, and similar materials) would then be received by the District as one, single-stream and placed into a hopper connected to a compactor roll-off box. When full, the box would be removed by truck and delivered to off- Island recyclables processing and recovery facilities. 4.3 Source Separated Food Waste & Other Recyclable Organics The District will encourage residents and users to source-separate and deliver to the site this new stream of uncontaminated food waste and recyclable organics for processing and introduction into the composting program. Bins will be located at the upper, resident parking area to receive these materials from residents. The District will use on-site equipment to move the bins into the organics processing building on a daily or more frequent basis. Larger deliveries, such as from the two golf clubs, would be dropped directly in the organics mixing building by the inbound truck. Project Management Associates LLC 5 FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Waste Control Plan Inside the organics mixing building, operating staff will introduce the organic materials into a grinder designed to process: a.) food waste rich material; and, b.) paper, cardboard and other fibrous materials. Once the organics are reduced in size, they will be mixed with other materials (chipped brush, logs and yard waste) in a concrete storage area. Staff may also add water to the mixture at this point to insure the composting mass is optimal for biological activity and decomposition. Staff will periodically add the fresh mixture to the compost heap by pulling back the cover and adding to the heap. Composting has historically been conducted in open windrows, which are periodically turned. Once the proposed improvements are complete, all composting will be conducted on a concrete pad, and with a special cover system. The pad will have an integrated air supply system and leachate collection system. The composting activity will be controlled through monitoring the temperature of the composting material while maintaining adequate air supply to insure the heap does not convert to anaerobic activity. Collected leachate, if any, will be recirculated into the compost program to minimize discharges. The District has a large mobile shredder to process logs and brush, which activity would continue. The District also has a portable screen for use in maximizing the quality of the final product. 4.4 Bulky, Oversized Wastes For FIWMD, this category of waste includes a range of oversized waste materials that includes things like: carpets, chairs and other furniture, mattresses and box springs, appliances, tires and other similar materials. Mixed C/D materials (other than wood) is also placed in this container. There will be no change in how these wastes are received and managed at the compost site. Metals will be placed in the metals box for recycling and the non-recyclable materials will be placed into containers. Once full, the boxes of recyclable and non-recyclable materials will be picked up by truck and taken by ferry where they will be delivered to recycling and processing facilities. 4.5 Construction and Demolition Wood Waste There will be no changes in how this wastestream is managed; waste wood will be placed into a dedicated container for transportation to off-Island processing facilities. 4.6 Re-Use of Discarded Items At present there is an informal process at the compost site where residents can leave usable items such as furniture, bicycles and similar unwanted items. One of the proposed improvements is the installation of a small modular building that can be used to store and protect these items so as to encourage re-use of items in good condition, commonly called a"Swap-Shop"at municipal drop- off sites. 4.7 E-Waste E-Waste will be placed in a storage building near the entrance to the site. FIWMD will then periodically arrange for the removal and recycling of items received and stored at this location. Project Management Associates LLC 6 FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Waste Control Plan 5.0 Staffing & Employee Training 5.1 Staffing The following chart illustrates the organization of FIWMD and its operating staff. Figure 2: FIWMD Organization Chart I 1• W - ® m • dftfes En 5.2 Employee Qualification and Training All loads of incoming waste material shall be inspected by a representative of the facility who has been trained in the methods and procedures outlined in this waste control plan. The Operations Manager is responsible for qualification and training of operating staff. These activities generally include: • Determining that prospective employees meet the minimum qualifications to perform the assigned position and; • Train all personnel to ensure that all personnel are given the opportunity and guidance to acquire the knowledge, skills, and experience necessary to perform their responsibilities in a safe manner and in keeping with FIWMD's operating requirements. While FIWMD's approach is intended to be flexible so as to accommodate qualification of personnel with various backgrounds, skills, and knowledge,while all personnel must meet certain requirements to ensure that they can perform the job adequately and safely with a high degree of mutual confidence. Project Management Associates LLC 7 FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Waste Control Plan Qualifications FIWMD insures that each employee is qualified to perform the assigned duties through: • Clearly identifying required qualifications for each position before hiring and managing the hiring process to determine that each candidate meets such applicable minimum requirements; and, • Provision of ongoing and specialized training. Ongoing training includes routine review of FIWMD's operating requirements and specialized training is provided whenever necessary such as to prepare the individual to operate unfamiliar equipment, new processes, to perform new responsibilities, or similar circumstances. Training The training program includes a combination of formal and informal training. Formal training may include an employee's review of documentation such as FIWMD's operations plans,permit requirements, and,where equipment operation and maintenance is involved, review of documentation related to the subject equipment. Informal training methods include the day-to-day, on-the-job training that is provided to individuals in the normal course of operations by the Operations Manager and other experienced staff. In particular,this includes: • Provision of guidance and assistance to users to insure safety procedures are complied with; • Insuring that unacceptable wastes are rejected or, if not rejected,properly separated from acceptable materials and stored safely until they can be properly managed; • Insuring that wastes and recyclables are placed in the proper locations; and, • Safe operation and maintenance of all on-site equipment. The Operations Manager is responsible to insure that any employee that is to operate equipment at the site or on behalf of FIWMD is properly trained and has the qualifications to perform the duties assigned in a safe manner and in accordance with all applicable laws. Employees will be trained in the operations of emergency equipment(i.e. fire extinguishers, spill response kit, first aid kits) at the facility. All employees at the facility will be trained in the recognition and the handling procedures for unauthorized and/or hazardous waste. Project Management Associates LLC 8 FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Waste Control Plan 6.0 Managing Unauthorized Wastes 6.1 As-Received Inspections There is a two-fold inspection process that will be used for materials delivered to this facility. Initially, FIWMD staff will observe all waste deliveries by residents and others delivering waste and recyclables. This observation process will accomplish multiple goals, including; - Insuring only acceptable materials are being deposited by users. Unacceptable materials discovered during the delivery process will be rejected. - Insuring materials are placed in the appropriate on-site location/container; and, - Monitoring users for compliance with safety procedures. Material delivered to the organics processing building will be visually inspected by the attendant as it is dumped onto the tipping floor. Unacceptable materials discovered at that time will be rejected and the delivering party must remove it from the site. FIWMD's staff has been effective in identifying unacceptable materials at the point of delivery since users are supervised during much of their on-site activity. Whenever this occurs,the item is rejected and the user is not allowed to deposit the item at the facility. However, unacceptable items may be discovered where it is not possible to reject the material prior to delivery and FIWMD will therefore be responsible for its storage and proper disposal. In some cases, waste may not be actually unacceptable for delivery to the facility, however it may be placed in a location that could contaminate other materials. 6.2 Unacceptable Materials Discovered—Delivering Party Not Known Following is a description of how unacceptable materials are to be managed: I. Unacceptable waste material discovered generally on the site will be brought to the attention of the Operations Manager, who will make an assessment of the potential risk associated with handling the waste. If safe to do so, such waste will be placed in one of the on-site buildings for safe-keeping until arrangements can be made for its safe disposal. Locations to be used for this purpose include the maintenance garage and also the residue storage area in the new organics building. If the Operations Manager cannot identify the material, or it does not appear to be normal material of the types accepted, then the material will be removed and staff will attempt to limit the potential spread of contamination (if any appears to be present). All personnel should exercise caution whenever handling abandoned,unknown, or potentially hazardous materials; 2. Material on the organics building tipping floor will be exposed and inspected a second time by the attendant and/or the loader operator as it is being processed. The operators are responsible for removing unacceptable materials from the tip floor and placing it in the waste container located in the designated storage area inside the building or into the MSW compactor unit. In most cases, unacceptable materials discovered in this area are not expected to present a hazard, but a potential source of contamination to the compost product(example; plastic bags); 3. Material located in the unprocessed brush/yard waste storage area will also be inspected by the loader operator as it is being processed. Project Management Associates LLC 9 FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Waste Control Plan The supervisor will be responsible for contacting qualified personnel or a hazardous waste management firm,to properly identify,remove and dispose of such wastes, as appropriate. 6.3 Storage of Unacceptable Materials All unacceptable materials that are discovered on the site and where it cannot be rejected during the delivery process or returned the delivering party will be placed in a container in either the maintenance garage or in the new organics processing building as shown on the site plan (unless deemed hazardous for this location). FIWMD will arrange for the proper management of any unacceptable materials that result from these activities. 7.0 Signage FIWMD will provide for the following signage at the facility: 1. Entrance: a sign will be erected at the entrance that shows the hours of operation and acceptable materials handled. A second sign will also show a list of typical kinds of unacceptable wastes that users may seek to deliver to the facility; 2. At each receiving location signs will identify allowable materials. At a minimum, the following locations will have signage: a. E-Waste storage shed; b. Swap-shop shed; c. Scrap Metal, Wood and Bulky Waste containers; d. Organics containers and organics building tip floor area; e. Recycling Containers (OCC and single-stream); f. MSW containers; and, g. Brush,yard trimmings and tree debris drop-off area. 3. Safety signage will also be installed as follows: a. At areas of the site available to users where particular risks may be present, such as fall risks. b. In operating areas where FIWMD staff may be subjected to workplace hazards. 4. Traffic Control Signage Traffic control signs will be strategically placed at the facility to enhance the safety of users and site operating staff. 8.0 Site Plan The attached site plan provides information on the operation of the facility and locations of waste materials on the site. Project Management Associates LLC 10 FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Waste Control Plan 9.0 Safety The operations manager is responsible for on-site safety and serve as compliance officer with respect to health and safety issues and help ensure that all on site operations are performed in accordance with OSHA regulations, including implementation of informational programs for employees with respect to on the job health and safety on an as needed basis. Appropriate safety equipment will be maintained on site, as necessary, including but not limited to the following types of equipment: • Personal Protective Equipment - Gloves, earplugs, overalls, safety glasses, steel-toed boots, hard-hats, etc. • Moving Equipment- Seat belts, backup warning buzzers, rollover bars, brakes, etc. 9.1 Safety Procedures Safety training will consist of the following information and practices: • The location of first aid and safety equipment; • The correct use of safety equipment, including, but not limited to, gloves, masks, eye protection, and safety boots; • Specific work place practices, specifically: o Hand washing. o Handling of sharp objects. o Working around moving equipment. o Routine examinations of equipment. o Disposal of contaminated materials. o Correct and safe operation of all on site firefighting equipment. o Procedure for reporting safety violations. All precautions to be taken to safeguard employee health and welfare shall be, at a minimum, in accordance with OSHA regulations and any applicable local rules and regulations. Physical hazards will be identified, listed, and marked in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.144. Protective equipment for personnel may include the following devices as applicable to individual tasks: • Respirators as required by 29 CFR 1910.134 • Safety boots/shoes as required by 29 CFR 1910.136 • Hard hats as required by 29 CFR 1910.135 • Safety glasses/goggles as required by 29 CFR 1910.156 • Gloves as required by 29 CFR 1919.156 (C) • Faces shields as required by 29 CFR 1910.133 • Emergency stop switches for machinery as required by 29 CFR 1910.216(e) • Hearing protection as required by 29 CFR 1910.95 (C) Project Management Associates LLC 11 FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Waste Control Plan 10.0 Record Keeping & Reporting FIWMD maintains records of all outbound materials by material type and destination. These records are currently based upon weigh data from the receiving facility but would be based upon weigh data produced at the facility once the new scale is installed and operational. To the extent inbound weights are recorded in the future, FIWMD will maintain records of inbound vehicles weighed in the database. FIWMD will rely upon these records to produce and file the facility annual reports in NYSDEC's prescribed forms. Project Management Associates LLC 12 D. / v R EA — 1 \ \ \ �_ BRICK,CONCR � ) 1 \ J / — �/ • \\\ _ _ — _ _ \ " MAINTENANCE 15D6Y.MAX./ ETINGSPACI:-- PAD FOR WpOD GRINDER/SHREDDER (UNPROCESSF,DBRUSH) �\ 160 G.Y.M% \ ` spurt /' \\ ,•%/ — \ 1 I GROUND BRUSH \11\\ / nDTREiesi—W'��' \ \\ \ \ \ \ ( \ AND LOGS \) RSD W 5 \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ )5 C Y AX /ai \ / / nEpA uW.oASTE Hoo"�`a`\1di�EAw_srE_ \\ C6kPjOSTING\\\ \\ `\\ `�� - <V' }�Y Of 'ii`/•. // 1 I I 1 EA <"� ' \ \ GRGANI nEklSTINGTRANSFERSTATION 1 ''MWNGB ING' �\ \ s )6NLY MAIL MPOSTPAD \ ATTENDANT SHE. O COMPOST—DA-1 Q \; _ ———— --- . X0.3—APSHOP BU—ING 250 REYIGEDPRDPER UNE 6 HIGH CHAIn LWN P-ETER FENCE �DNT FDRDR / pp aNEas GwNICSG.LLFGTIDN ANCHOR / J ul<PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS FREPPRE / FtsxEas ISwnsNn S ENT Orsr WASTE CONTT ROL L SITE PLAN Hy m " uP.re eel Na 1sx�sI'n. • snvls APPENDIX D R _ „„•� ..art,"': • -�. FIWMDStation > •tit `, t:rur .-'( [M- Ei oiiAx)NTEo 00 t IAIf `Y •... `tet ! ::')h r� _ — % i %`'y" \ )xJt,s .,v^y`r�• n ., — ,• iN } \� t. ,+�' .. f "Y -I i� � tt _ �y� / ,t^"\ "tt°,J._.'te^'�, i�.c \ `2'.:;, rACKrtr�4Ry t `''l• BRICK,CONCRETE /' `Lr•.f INERT MATERIALS H i >;- / •/ tt [/,/ t2;'S _ G� ME[TRISIAC[ t spy a°u:TeAll aN. D FOR WOOD , 1 GRINDER/SHREDDER .. � _ : ..,�,',. •. � ...__.. ', /- _ _ Y .t .\ GROUND BRVSN ,yy}J l .•. l AND , I, aEEon�w - abs .... } AND OVE E6 s \ r �, , `� / .•',� �' r 1\, ' F L ¢ � � .T..'f` INdMatA R\ �N 1 t tt \ / / coMroBTINB , / \,\.` / JJ J w«.r.D RPeO/ \\ •t' / i^/.. o- '� i \ -- �X• :I,_STIlG TRAM rATi'EDN /wx'sraao 9N.gINB 1 /,N', t �/ '/ / .n`•?Y"`:1 / 1,. C�.2'; \ttil / / ti\.`.. ♦.` / ` rRRSNm—1 rA4 f^lp:y{�(tr .! �/ ` } `\ ?.. •� f / I nevaeo crtoceRr,uHc 1 c401ARLIrEA11EF.K0E ,Y.- t/ J//^�erTJ•IMob Wut _'__r ,`� a '-13r `;,Ly,,,_,,. ..�� p✓.f ,::J E. « T�, ANCHOR _ 't5 ''y"'^ 'yP` '33• ,. �4 E[NTINc rpOOERnuME, _ �' � \ � -. \ -•k. )AMMO PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS 4E i. J�•yw�h.yr.._yG....f""+"`,,r"',,f. S .; / .`c.y'._ �'Y \ ^n. / ! A.DID. ^�Ji a'� S /M1o104ED NG snACE fT' v) /,�; J HS-5 s —5ISLAID WASTE IAUAGEMENT DISTRXT SITE LAYOUT&UTILITY PLAN ISLAND,11 �EocATEP ATTEND.NT ED / 7 �. g rn \ ,'.'�`.. l w. �wEAasen oRwNKs couEETroN i,M .� o.. Fishers Island Waste Management Facility 2760 Whistler Avenue,Fishers Island,Town of Southold,New York Site Photographs Photograph 1: Looking east-northeast at the central portion of the solid waste management facility and the receiving area for bulky wastes. (Photograph Date: 11-2016) 1 Fishers Island Waste Management Facility 2760 Whistler Avenue,Fishers Island,Town of Southold, New York Site Photographs .. t. Photograph 2: Looking east at the central portion of the solid waste management facility. (Photograph Date: 11-2016) z Fishers Island Waste Management Facility 2760 Whistler Avenue,Fishers Island,Town of Southold,New York Site Photographs Photograph 3: View of the location of the proposed maintenance building. Existing office/maintenance is visible on right side of photograph. Whistler Avenue is in the background. (Photograph Date: 3-2017) 3 Fishers Island Waste Management Facility 2760 Whistler Avenue,Fishers Island,Town of Southold,New York Site Photographs i Photograph 4: Looking north at the location of the proposed maintenance building. The proposed building would be placed on unvegetated area. (Photograph Date: 3-2017) 4 Fishers Island Waste Management Facility 2760 Whistler Avenue,Fishers Island,Town of Southold,New York Site Photographs Photograph 5: View of the northern portion of the existing solid waste management facility. (Photograph Date: 3-2017) 5 Fishers Island Waste Management Facility 2760 Whistler Avenue,Fishers Island,Town of Southold, New York Site Photographs i Photograph 6: View of the westerly extent of the existing solid waste management facility. (Photograph Date: 3-2017) 6 Fishers Island Waste Management Facility 2760 Whistler Avenue,Fishers Island,Town of Southold,New York Site Photographs Y' J Photograph 7: Looking west-southwest at the location of the proposed mixing building and concrete pads for compost material (within existing cleared and concrete areas). (Photograph Date: 3-2017) Fishers Island Waste Management Facility 2760 Whistler Avenue,Fishers Island,Town of Southold,New York Site Photographs t Photograph 8: Looking south-southwest at the location of the proposed attendant shed on existing cleared area. A runway at the Elizabeth Field Airport is visible in the background,beyond the tree line. (Photograph Date: 3-2017) s Fishers Island Waste Management Facility 2760 Whistler Avenue,Fishers Island,Town of Southold,New York Site Photographs y a 1 Photograph 9: View from Fox Lane towards the location of the proposed maintenance building. (Photograph Date: 3-2017) 9 Fishers Island Waste Management Facility . 1 Whistler Avenue,Fishers Island,Town of Southold,New York Site Photographs K Photograph V "cam._ -2�. •' � t�.$... � � � . 10: View from Fox Lane,looking southeast. Date: 1 Fishers Island Waste Management Facility 2760 Whistler Avenue,Fishers Island,Town of Southold,New York Site Photographs 4 u Photograph 10: Looking east at the Fox Lane/Whistler Avenue junction. Site access driveway is on the right side of the photograph. (Photograph Date: 3-2017) 11 APPENDIX E r ILt NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Division of Materials Management,Region 1 SUNY-C Stony Brook,50 Circle Road,Stony Brook;NY 11790 P:(631)444-0375 1 F:(631)'444-0231 www.dec.ny.gov January 31, 2016 Ms. Beth Stern Fishers Island Waste Management District 2660 Whistler Ave Fishers Island, New York 06390 Re: Solid Waste Management Facility Registration No. 52 R 13 R Municipally Owned/ Operated Transfer Station Uncontaminated Unadulterated Wood Processing Facility Yard Waste and Source Separated Organic Waste Composting Dear Ms. Stern: Enclosed is a validated copy of your registration form submitted to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 360. This letter only acknowledges receipt of your registration form and does not, in any way, verify that the information which you provided on the form is true or correct. Also, please be advised that the validation of this registration is contingent upon you being the owner or having legal authority to use the described site. In addition, you are responsible for obtaining any other permits and approvals that may be required; and for complying with all other applicable State and Federal laws, rules, regulations and all other applicable local ordinances including, but not limited to, zoning ordinances, building codes, Fire Marshal codes, etc. This registered activity shall in no way conflict with any mined land reclamation permit and approved reclamation plan. You are reminded that 6 NYCRR Part 360 contains various requirements that must be followed to warrant your facility's continued status as a registered facility. This information was provided in the registration package. If you have any questions regarding this matter or need an additional copy of the registration requirements, please contact James J. Wade, P.E. of my staff at the above telephone number. Sincerely, Syed H. Rahman, P.E. Regional Materials Management Engineer Enclosure cc: File NEW YORK Department of UPFORTUUNUY Environmental Conservation 47-14-020 (04/00) DEPARTMENT USE ONLY NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF SOLID & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AREGISTRATION FORM FOR A DEC REGISTRATION # lqw SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY DEC ADMINISTRATION # ase read and follow all instructions before DATE RECEIVED pleting this registration form PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY THIS IS NOT AN UPA PERMIT 1. FACILITY NAME AND LOCATION Transfer Station and Compost Facility 2. FACILITY OWNER'S NAME Fishers Island Waste Management District Street 2660 Whistler Ave Mai 1 i ng Addre PO Box22 C i ty/V i 11 a c Fishers Island Ci ty/T o w n/V i 11 i Fishers Island TOwr Southold Count`,Suffolk State/Zi p CO NewYork/06390 Telephone Numk(631)788-7455 Telephone Numt(631)788-7455 3. FACILITY OPERATOR'S NAME.Jif different) 4. SITE OW_NER_'S NAME (if. dif_fe_r_ent) See Owner See Owner Mailing Addrf Mailing AddrE City/Town/Vill City/Town/Vill State/Zip C( State/Zip Cc Telephone Num' Telephone Numl TYPE OF FACILITY REGISTRATION (check all a pl i cabl e) Waste Tire Stored for On-site Energy Recovery Li Energy Recovery Incinerators or Pyrof sis Units [360-13.1(d)(1)(ii )] [360-3.1(c)] ; ❑ Tire Dealers Selling Waste Tires [360-13.1(d)(Land Clearing Debris Landfills three acres or less ❑ [360-7.2(a)] ❑ Tire Manufacturing Facilities [360-13.1(d)(1)( Pi Transfer Stations (municipally owned/operated/contr❑tedrocessing Facilities Receiving Only Recogniza 1 receiving less than 50,000 cubic yards or 12,500 tons oUncontaminated Concrete,, Asphalt Pavement, Bri k household solid waste annually [360-11.1(b)(i )] Soil or Rock [360-16.1(d)(1)(i )] ❑ Transfer Stations (municipally owned/operated/cont ✓ ted0contaminated Unadulterated Wood Processing receiving less than 50,000 cubic yards or 12,500 t o€acilities [360-16.1(d)(1)(ii )] containerized solid waste annually [360-11.1(b)(2)] 0 Other Facilities not specifically described ab � ❑ Source Separated, Nonputrescible Solid Waste Recycllespecify type Handling a n d Recovery Facilities [360-12.1(d)] Yard waste and source separated organic waste composting In accordance with Part ❑ Waste Tire Retreaders [360-13.1(d)(1)(i )] 3605 3(b)(1)(i)and(in) 6. SOLID WASTE HANDLED 7. OPERATIONS SCHEDULE - Normal schedule of operation a. List wastes and/or materials to be accepted Daily 730AM to 430 PM Saturday&Sunday 730 AM to 1230 PM May close one MSW,source separatd recyclables and organic waste,yard waste,brush,wood waste,oversize or more days/week based on seasonal and other factors MSW,C&D debris,scrap metal and a-waste b. Quantity (specify Units - see instructions) 8. NAME(S) OF ALL MUNICIPALITIES SERVED d e s i g n c a p a c i Max 8,000 cv or 2,000 tons/year mcludi all materials Fishers Island,NY storage on si.Max 1,000cyor250tons 9. CERTIFICATION: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that information provided on this form and attach and exhibits was prepared by me or under my supervision and direction and is true to the best of my kti belief, a n d that I have the a u t h o r Business Manager Fishers Island Waste Management District to sign this registration form pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 360. By signing this registration form, I affil y. _ read the applicable regulations and will abide by all conditions of the registration requirements. I it )false statement made herein is punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the P l Pri nted/Typed N Beth A. Stern Signa�t�lr Mo. Day Ye r o v.Li� 5 20 16 REGIONAL OFFICE COPY - COPY #1 Instructions for Completion of a REGISTRATION FORM FOR A SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY GFNFRAL registration form is prescribed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) fo ,.gement facilities pursuant to the requirements of 6 NYCRR Part 360. Make every effort to enter the inrfo the spaces provided on this f or Mtthart additional sheets where space prohibits full and complete answers. For the purposes of this form, the term "facility" shall mean "solid waste management facility." The owner or operator must sign this registration form and must submit the completed registration form to th Hazardous Materials Engineer for the DEC region in which the facility is located or is proposed to be locate be submitted at least 30 days prior to undertaking the activity proposed for registration. ITEM NUMBER 1. Enter the name and address of the facility. Attach a United States Geological Survey Topographic Map, or a commercially available map of similar scale showing the exact location of the facility. 2. Identify the entity or person who owns the facility. 3. Identify the entity or person responsible for the overall management and operation of the facility. 4. Identify the entity or person who owns the site on which the facility is situated, or who will own the site on which the proposed facility will be situated, if different than the current facility owner. 5. Check all the appropriate boxes that describe the facility that is the subject of this registration. 6. a. Enter the specific types of wastes to be accepted at the facility. b. Facility design and storage capacities shall be indicated in units appropriate to the type of Registration Facility (i .e. , tire manufacturing facilities to indicate number of waste tires) . 7. Indicate the normal schedule of facility operation (i.e., Monday - Saturday, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., closed Sunday) . 8. Enter the name of all municipalities (counties, cities, towns and/or villages) in the existing and/or proposed service area of the facility. The certification block must be completed by the registrant. 10. Registrant retain Copy #4 and submit remaining copies to appropriate Regional Solid & Hazardous Mater REGIONAL SOLID & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ENGINEERS Regional Solid & Hazardous Regional Solid & Hazardous Regional Solid & Hazardous Materials Engineer Materials Engineer Materials Engineer NYSDEC - Region 1 NYSDEC - Region 2 NYSDEC - Region 3 SUNY Campus 1 Hunters Point Plaza 21 South Putt Corners Road Loop Road, Building 40 47-40 21st Street New Paltz, NY 12561-1695 Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 Long Island City, NY 11101-5407 (845) 256-3137 (631) 444-0375 (718) 482-4996 Regional Solid & Hazardous Regional Solid & Hazardous Regional Solid & Hazardous Materials Engineer Materials Engineer Materials Engineer NYSDEC - Region 4 NYSDEC - Region 5 NYSDEC - Region 6 1150 North Westcott Road Route 86 - P.O. Box 296 State Office Building Schenectady, NY 12306-2014 Ray Brook, NY 12977-0296 317 Washington Street (518) 357-2346 (518) 897-1241 Watertown, NY 13601-3787 (315) 785-2513 Regional Solid & Hazardous Regional Solid & Hazardous Regional Solid & Hazardous Materials Engineer Materials Engineer Materials Engineer NYSDEC - Region 7 NYSDEC - Region 8 NYSDEC - Region 9 615 Erie Blvd. West 6274 East Avon-Lima Road 270 Michigan Avenue Syracuse, NY 13204-2400 Avon, NY 14414-9519 Buffalo, NY 14203-2999 (315) 426-7419 (716) 226-2466 (716) 851-7220 Mail Processing Center Aeronautical Study No. Federal Aviation Administration 2016-AEA-9279-OE Southwest Regional Office Obstruction Evaluation Group 10101 Hillwood Parkway Fort Worth, TX 76177 Issued Date: 11/07/2016 Beth Stern Fishers Island Waste Management District P.O. Box 22 Fishers Island,NY 06390 ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations,part 77, concerning: Structure: Building Mixing Building - SW Corner Location: Fishers Island,NY Latitude: 41-15-14.89N NAD 83 Longitude: 72-02-03.82W Heights: 27 feet site elevation(SE) 32 feet above ground level (AGL) 59 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) _'his aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, is(are)met: It is required that FAA Form 7460-2,Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, be e-filed any time the project is abandoned or: At least 10 days prior to start of construction(7460-2, Part 1) X Within 5 days after the construction reaches its greatest height(7460-2, Part 2) Based on this evaluation, marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking/ lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis, we recommend it be installed and maintained in accordance with FAA Advisory circular 70/7460-1 L Change 1. The structure considered under this study lies in proximity to an airport and occupants may be subjected to noise from aircraft operating to and from the airport. Any height exceeding 32 feet above ground level (59 feet above mean sea level), will result in a substantial adverse effect and would warrant a Determination of Hazard to Air Navigation. This determination expires on 05/07/2018 unless: (a) the construction is started(not necessarily completed) and FAA Form 7460-2,Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, is received by this office. Page 1 of 4 (b) extended, revised, or terminated by the issuing office. (c) the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed, as required by the FCC, within 6 months of the date of this determination. In such case,the determination expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or the date the FCC denies the application. NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST BE E-FILED AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. AFTER RE-EVALUATION OF CURRENT OPERATIONS IN THE AREA OF THE STRUCTURE TO DETERMINE THAT NO SIGNIFICANT AERONAUTICAL CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED, YOUR DETERMINATION MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR ONE EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates , heights, frequency(ies) and power . Any changes in coordinates ,heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration , including increase to heights,power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. any failure or malfunction that lasts more than thirty (30) minutes and affects a top light or flashing obstruction _fight,regardless of its position, should be reported immediately to (877) 487-6867 so a Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) can be issued. As soon as the normal operation is restored, notify the same number. If we can be of further assistance,please contact our office at(404) 305-6531. On any future correspondence concerning this matter,please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2016-AEA-9279-OE. Signature Control No: 306897324-309430624 (DNE) Darin Clipper Specialist Attachment(s) Case Description Map(s) Page 2 of 4 Case Description for ASN 2016-AEA-9279-OE Construction of pre-engineered metal building Page 3 of 4 TOPO Map for ASN 2016-AEA-9279-OE 17n X _ Y"Mv 0-1 13 3' Aj 1-i.®r I 'TW Iowa at vi", -7 r .4v WTI ny QK Rook pzs- ZY! S.uGOON A&V . ......... lie QeA & mow Ta Man zs .rd' _r" , , K"s-1— , §�' " VO VU2 "tm lilt KA tg A in 1_161 tttJ.kir-Plrr:'A 2 Q 41k Tt� ,UK 141 4111- n 'KA 7, 1%. vr: WK 04 "r 'j kt�f -�'" ;K; !& - y is W!�Pf ri nw Y" MI. "S"') Page 4 of 4 Mail Processing Center Aeronautical Study No. • Federal Aviation Administration 2016-AEA-9280-OE Southwest Regional Office Obstruction Evaluation Group 10101 Hillwood Parkway Fort Worth, TX 76177 Issued Date: 11/07/2016 Beth Stern Fishers Island Waste Management District P.O. Box 22 Fishers Island,NY 06390 ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning: Structure: Building Mixing Building -NW Corner Location: Fishers Island,NY Latitude: 41-15-15.28N NAD 83 Longitude: 72-02-03.33W Heights: 27 feet site elevation(SE) 39 feet above ground level (AGL) 66 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) !''his aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, is(are)met: It is required that FAA Form 7460-2,Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, be e-filed any time the project is abandoned or: At least 10 days prior to start of construction (7460-2, Part 1) X Within 5 days after the construction reaches its greatest height(7460-2, Part 2) Based on this evaluation, marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking/ lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis,we recommend it be installed and maintained in accordance with FAA Advisory circular 70/7460-1 L Change 1. The structure considered under this study lies in proximity to an airport and occupants may be subjected to noise from aircraft operating to and from the airport. Any height exceeding 39 feet above ground level (66 feet above mean sea level),will result in a substantial adverse effect and would warrant a Determination of Hazard to Air Navigation. This determination expires on 05/07/2018 unless: (a) the construction is started (not necessarily completed) and FAA Form 7460-2,Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, is received by this office. Page 1 of 4 (b) extended, revised, or terminated by the issuing office. (c) the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed, as required by the FCC, within 6 months of the date of this determination. In such case,the determination expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or the date the FCC denies the application. NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST BE E-FILED AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. AFTER RE-EVALUATION OF CURRENT OPERATIONS IN THE AREA OF THE STRUCTURE TO DETERMINE THAT NO SIGNIFICANT AERONAUTICAL CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED, YOUR DETERMINATION MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR ONE EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates ,heights, frequency(ies) and power . Any changes in coordinates , heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights,power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc.,which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However,this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. any failure or malfunction that lasts more than thirty (30) minutes and affects a top light or flashing obstruction -ight, regardless of its position, should be reported immediately to (877) 487-6867 so a Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) can be issued. As soon as the normal operation is restored, notify the same number. If we can be of further assistance,please contact our office at(404) 305-6531. On any future correspondence concerning this matter,please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2016-AEA-9280-OE. Signature Control No: 306897325-309430623 (DNE) Darin Clipper Specialist Attachment(s) Case Description Map(s) Page 2 of 4 Case Description for ASN 2016-AEA-9280-OE Construction of pre-engineered metal building Page 3 of 4 TOPO Map for ASN 2016-AEA-9280-OE Ill 717-7, j- X, F-v 'l.F v �'Ua ri �'.�.°'� � R��!��a%' ,1- b �_ - i i-Ma �9 )cf;�7, g- MOM N5 A wV wk,, Y, S, iA 'M 'q� �R:"w -55i `47 NJ 4Z� Y� kA V", T-14.Al n;ia, YL 5, 44, -�5 5R, P K,p- rVby- �n 1, TKU., .ti "P "Ov:'I" d v2t� S., 4'1�`,JV t -il I VZ-- Q ll$ON. A� 6,iRti-, j re, W Nu•E—, Page 4 of 4 Mail Processing Center Aeronautical Study No. Federal Aviation Administration 2016-AEA-9281-OE Southwest Regional Office Obstruction Evaluation Group 10101 Hillwood Parkway Fort Worth, TX 76177 Issued Date: 11/07/2016 Beth Stern Fishers Island Waste Management District P.O. Box 22 Fishers Island,NY 06390 ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations,part 77, concerning: Structure: Building Mixing Building - SE Corner Location: Fishers Island,NY Latitude: 41-15-14.30N NAD 83 Longitude: 72-02-03.03W Heights: 27 feet site elevation(SE) 25 feet above ground level (AGL) 52 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) ,his aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, is(are)met: It is required that FAA Form 7460-2,Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, be e-filed any time the project is abandoned or: At least 10 days prior to start of construction(7460-2, Part 1) X Within 5 days after the construction reaches its greatest height(7460-2,Part 2) Based on this evaluation, marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking/ lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis, we recommend it be installed and maintained in accordance with FAA Advisory circular 70/7460-1 L Change 1. The structure considered under this study lies in proximity to an airport and occupants may be subjected to noise from aircraft operating to and from the airport. Any height exceeding 25 feet above ground level (52 feet above mean sea level), will result in a substantial adverse effect and would warrant a Determination of Hazard to Air Navigation. This determination expires on 05/07/2018 unless: (a) the construction is started(not necessarily completed) and FAA Form 7460-2,Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, is received by this office. Page 1 of 4 (b) extended,revised, or terminated by the issuing office. (c) the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed, as required by the FCC, within 6 months of the date of this determination. In such case,the determination expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or the date the FCC denies the application. i-TOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST BE E-FILED AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. AFTER RE-EVALUATION OF CURRENT OPERATIONS IN THE AREA OF THE STRUCTURE TO DETERMINE THAT NO SIGNIFICANT AERONAUTICAL CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED, YOUR DETERMINATION MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR ONE EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates , heights, frequency(ies) and power . Any changes in coordinates , heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights,power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. any failure or malfunction that lasts more than thirty (30) minutes and affects a top light or flashing obstruction ight, regardless of its position, should be reported immediately to (877) 487-6867 so a Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) can be issued. As soon as the normal operation is restored, notify the same number. If we can be of further assistance,please contact our office at(404) 305-6531. On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2016-AEA-9281-OE. Signature Control No: 306897326-309430625 (DNE) Darin Clipper Specialist Attachment(s) Case Description Map(s) Page 2 of 4 Case Description for ASN 2016-AEA-9281-OE Construction of pre-engineered metal building Page 3 of 4 TOPO Map for ASN 2016-AEA-9281-OE Q n sit :f -Y oil'I TINA - 41 06; OvalR Q ow Any? As Al lot NAM in _J SH" ni�, -�x 01- 2E g, A,'g -R nu ma his 4W WOMEN V2 AW 5- sw , R1 A,- f U; -qP '21 kiuv"05 'A5 w WW ��Ow;�S-.OS _ ; I �'N� Nj INN, AN,rTl our a "Pow, m gi -w-Q 00 a -MM""MA •- ---, - W wool nny NAM g MIN 0, NO .......... -MEMO Page 4 of 4 Mail Processing Center Aeronautical Study No. Federal Aviation Administration 2016-AEA-9282-OE Southwest Regional Office Obstruction Evaluation Group 10101 Hillwood Parkway Fort Worth, TX 76177 Issued Date: 11/07/2016 Beth Stern Fishers Island Waste Management District P.O. Box 22 Fishers Island,NY 06390 ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning: Structure: Building Mixing Building -NE Corner Location: Fishers Island,NY Latitude: 41-15-14.64N NAD 83 Longitude: 72-02-02.64W Heights: 27 feet site elevation(SE) 31 feet above ground level (AGL) 58 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) 'his aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, is(are) met: It is required that FAA Form 7460-2,Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration,be e-filed any time the project is abandoned or: At least 10 days prior to start of construction(7460-2, Part 1) X Within 5 days after the construction reaches its greatest height(7460-2, Part 2) Based on this evaluation,marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking/ lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis, we recommend it be installed and maintained in accordance with FAA Advisory circular 70/7460-1 L Change 1. The structure considered under this study lies in proximity to an airport and occupants may be subjected to noise from aircraft operating to and from the airport. Any height exceeding 31 feet above ground level(58 feet above mean sea level), will result in a substantial adverse effect and would warrant a Determination of Hazard to Air Navigation. This determination expires on 05/07/2018 unless: (a) the construction is started(not necessarily completed) and FAA Form 7460-2,Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, is received by this office. Page 1 of 4 (b) extended,revised, or terminated by the issuing office. (c) the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed, as required by the FCC, within 6 months of the date of this determination. In such case,the determination expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or the date the FCC denies the application. —NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST BE E-FILED AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. AFTER RE-EVALUATION OF CURRENT OPERATIONS IN THE AREA OF THE STRUCTURE TO DETERMINE THAT NO SIGNIFICANT AERONAUTICAL CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED, YOUR DETERMINATION MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR ONE EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates , heights, frequency(ies) and power . Any changes in coordinates , heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights,power, or the addition of other transmitters,requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However,this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. °,any failure or malfunction that lasts more than thirty (30) minutes and affects a top light or flashing obstruction ;fight, regardless of its position, should be reported immediately to (877) 487-6867 so a Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) can be issued. As soon as the normal operation is restored, notify the same number. If we can be of further assistance,please contact our office at(404) 305-6531. On any future correspondence concerning this matter,please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2016-AEA-9282-OE. Signature Control No: 306897327-309430622 (DNE) Darin Clipper Specialist Attachment(s) Case Description Map(s) Page 2 of 4 Case Description for ASN 2016-AEA-9282-OE Construction of pre-engineered metal building Page 3 of 4 TOPO Map for ASN 2016-AEA-9282-OE T 1441 W Aj MIR 'We 17 CIO C- 0, 1K A OWNS MAY ft .......... 74- "Fps Egd Wit KIN RA balm k Dow WIT, - Rfti-f. nm, Yost. INA -4, a OR T� , m i�v N RUM Ou ZI Te :'; N 3k 3"A BRA . .... Wl 01 Q m Page 4 of 4 APPENDIX F r IL SITE DATA SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESIGN CALCULATIONS TABLE OF ELEVATIONS SOIL TESTING RESULTS S.C.T.Y s.I000-t3-1-1.1 USE I UNA 5WtTAT't CPOI I AITCKN TOTAL I GMM TLrA Ol [i•T RTI[ 1lA1xG N.1 D' .u ln1 r,wo alr•n, a 1•q 1 t�•Q9•"• ral>;t rrw tLLr-.11r ...... SITE YRA•a.8 ACRES SEPTIC ta,1 I4CT BJ.eD' IE[' atr r nc nsr I unnsr •sal n Total GUILDING-1-Crl Sr tnG-0 SF GanAGCttRGtCE 1650 SF 1650.o ab.99 ( NT.•(E 9B ?--�s�J�T _,�]�^.r,r,r• B_�:I�jn•^•+ �`Fs, �Y .�� RAGoOSED.1650 Y [[e11C lav fYJRLi tJ.JO' `:S_i'.� 4+••!i: 1 - • L• .-..ut�Li!�. LEAOHw rm i,lCr e:.n •!lLlJt J '�al'•�c._t»<u!z._�•s_.1enu ¢,.Las�r,,,ase....r¢lu wrR-ta. , r SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESIGN Wiz. = -)'fl"'r"'•"` L_, ,I.a:s--..,• t•'• '--"'c' 2�!° ��''L �•csDua.r�.us ci +' •• SEPTIC TW(r � r rr• ALLOWABLE SANITARY FLOW (DENSITY) nianF,m w.-o I2-1s.c¢ S v .wlT•4�ALI�.;, L �L`iju`�-"�''' �1"' ' GRCAL'm•atER 4ANIEEIf+{T 2551+ PR 11,111 IOW GAL YIN CAPAOITY SCPTIE taro '0_IJ31[JC •• "' • ;,;- LEaCNWo'00-, .,rtr i,--teo•w :-:'-'B .... :.'.,,. ::�s'�[i`.i i:r,:^-n.Cr -V ar`.r,�,..-„ AtLOrAGLE ttD•rOm WTE,)oocPoJacnq CONNECT NEW WATER SERVICE TO CURB BOX. nDO CPotA(AiEI t leas ACREsI=tu.cP0 ISv1IRC0,199 GPDvu.S rX0lSFA=66 sc CURB BOX 70 BE INSTALLED BY FISHERS ISLAND 4INfNJ SYSTEM SIDE.•LL LEEACHINO lqEA•300 3F WATER COMPANY PROVIDE,III 10'DIA X 10'EFF.CEPTN-114 SF nNimp WALE 3NALL ai AIS A YIN 1.07•lUt 2.0 /90Yd TIP 6 Tw IMIc EEMINO r�RAD GENERAL NOTES N-2a t, 1 • a - PROPOSED 1'TYPE K YIN 6•s.a MT./ wTn zD'uIN.uwnaE Acccss PROPERTY LINE COPPER WATEfl SERVICE oven 7Rt1.01 Wne•016 CBT IRM IAPPROX. L=140 FTI TRAFFIC BE"1&&N.tOVEn rYm.rwe.m o-acmr moo m.oa c.r.oQ.o ao.mAoea,rtw / /�//• 11767-E.TO CRAG ` t IE •�_,�I\=_�_` yl+l. r - • _ NyFILTER FAONit FUTURE / �1'OR lB PYRIFE AR'A Nsize srext. ®m��.lrw.•n v��w vIr tLLiFam,cvowtavr,n.vaYo.n a•mv Po-mao4•tmaro,vraowatla mt..nwc vaAcsm.wNoa vIm4a.Pmarlow>.mm no.•na..a.-.alm,uooman..NTa•nnsouvwasHa a.aaan `f>M1 sP+••AOA roc.te.mw•r rv-a n n•Ory Ont �{' stcw[cMaar. �.rn nY N..av Nss ov..,a m vma m.maclm.•m,>oa+oo LEACH ING-PI \•�- - IN,AAI 40w Ps, ` y-„�dw.•a„yt SML�.4T•Jwmaeem m.on wwear J..nn. 110'DIAU.'X 10.1 _ - - t f3FIV(STRUiCil1 � •,,2f _ I• -_ - .-_ .l!--` 6 m�iaa.vr.�l:os�vmu mei a I��u siK.sna tr n^•""i Amo o+losi . > r`' _ - �dY-/i� p f- 10 6•PRECISi LYi PIXX,FD A`•. ;-- _ '_^;..f , fcailn ant At. `�d.s;o•w tPIxI Y,a,.or va+,ol am lx n+lova nnoa nE m..tn+a SOIL TESTING RESULTS LEACHING PIT I HYERT w 92.02' -- --''� `` r=-ti,- a•"' s^.ACEI x.r.s. A. •.''-'.Nwv Pv[sda®tPw fall M n.Ic n-.le lw a.Po.roz o-u rc.vNwt atom�vr'v'u E Pra�mw mx full rn+xs rvX u.m r ,, y TPty TI` s�=. . •' - _ ___ .rN w.. )'E-" m v na ar,e lr<,o Irvnnr too n,te Y,w I:rsX ; •1,X 4IN. SLOPE ricL.�yL�Lr�w�t�� mama w.'co�a.aam rs,a b.uvrvrsrn onP ox,wctn.o raa w�•o ra _ -'�•'e'r•CJ l w 1 ]y wt�iC bulbNfW 1 YNO O4K WLLL v r-9Z�iu;-{/-/{. -:�'">,- - �..•�:��_L.'Dr�,n WL,tn. �� Re.,,1•�o m �et.R 4T,Pato b.M1.,P P.aL a n.rm r / -TANKN '�/j ."" '• '�^Ti�*fra, I' .`•`ni• fool mw.vm a�+•wv.r nNm�r nmol wvcvanm.amt�c mlc ra EWER,LINEI2X-MIN:SLDPEIa,'.; 5 •• �� e�w1. 1fr.,nrw.aulanaaa,Tclx. w ' n leraun loxatz �` :m u"a0fawa rooa.rum v um u w w.0 YR INVERT =92.80' �j INVERr/m 93.10'�g`- :.i V - - v.•,Qy "!Xr t o o<acwrm n elw.I-- 2 neolrJ:u.Do.m2 ',I r _ .� ` •/;Int u�••�n' �- I.m a nw onto P`tvn�m To inn vu nrna m t iea a'am.•ne rum+. " i Iu ,• -wmaT wn• 'm oroaL�tt nn.rar Pn.w,r Pw�v tw P.L w uw OBI �'.J' I�' r-•rx'v(nra- omJiw SEWER TINE -�_ t- L.+ecno-4r Poe >m.nr2tmP,Po..r.rPa Pmu„ay.e - IIFT STUB WITH CAPI : - rr -- �•��' l I rt• -_ - J v i ..e�� nL .LM•A+",e'ba• .xr,L fro T<mor r.4,n ,.moi mNgerw D M w}w16-Iw M IrKK•O M 4 rt4,G W41TO 'Unt IAL�fO ,w•la r,.rWL14rWc.nmf paaw PAt®oisYa,ln�NNauta J r , � � +m M P�ai��tm M wp�Y,nPP tnrw�rat focal O,l.te r••tm.00 lII[a OM1 w wIM1 M. ' - '1 m S,tla�n 1ROan N[RIL ti11�aW1�, •mnUl 140aC M. O:ina w,1ew•T w1 Ea oral w•+ear t.LL wSEPTIC TANK CROSS SECTION 'A"g ,m.,''91"`o,v�"".v aao-wtwnN•:cR%.Rlo. wu : �;�2 -�`_ _ '- _ - an[.wT wrlc owX ran nlrgrr..woo nnaww.Colt. / r! r -,bOj�-�"i •' �xotb`taeotum.r CEHFEIO./IE OF IQ'DIA. PROPOSED OWL, Y"'aa ,vruu+yoQ ms vrsromlr mrrnamtun nnsnn,nevV OY 1D'TILL LFAMINO PIT A NAIL"5%SLS SHALL 5E NAIMAIIED u•+Wu rw mvalm Pesci N9co(„Y,tJL i dtwto t 1 FOR A uINIAeAt U 2.'NOR tt-.LLY FR. wd�m'•r'a'' YIN.YIhHA.E ACCESS ThE NT MSI EDGE K IIIE LEA INO POOL. /.�� /34•DtA.CAST FMNI M�A wPco n Ona n•owe r+w enr aq-ow w.e nrra J t' r14Ff1E BGRINO Y.N. LLlmtaoo Fav M''ER INSTALLED TO OWL 6•YIJSALIN SOIL 0MTA / - 96 f to ,XF uaow a ural rv,vn•a mm m one alta P•smw tnzr 94 _1__ 94 n Ynv mmP no a ra>JnC v.ca 91 91 112 I 92 A ° 9I HAST INYFAz--r91 SC!!E F217 w 90 192.02.1 _ ___ _ PRfPOi£D WFTFS AND RDUNDS PRf1PFR7Y DfaCRIPTION - 89 _-- QWRLAA GENERAL FILLI"F) a9 at INNINv.1 0-1 OF 1M Int.neellol W Ms NQm,..1erIY Vb 01 F..LOTH •lth tha NCTItroOOt IY Aro OF..I..-10.-1 091m TSL 20 I-S-th oI. 01 OT LEGEND wm1 Mich 1.6sOf f..1...1 a.-1 eoalm the w,1s.51.1.1 Cwt(one ea ea GoOC.11.S-..y rrlmqul.rlm stoetwwl1 PROs'o,l - Ni 1-$-1 SO .r...AG EXISTINGmlrul.e Yot1,polo I-.1m 1M o+ld of mw rAi Lme to.nOtlnvNtl theneo 85 _`. Y- a9 Bib 301E fXF11N0 LOCATION -I-I Q s-50 O--.48 m1Mee e.et Moo.e.1 10 o wlntl Ince Soutn]9 N \\ WAGE84 /n1l'nLrl� O.Oreo9 12 mI--DO A-E-165.00 fel,1 .n Ira,.1- 1MCe s-,n 64 .9... 52- 61 /1\6jl':.1 •1•IJt le WM-S•.DOOM.C¢f1 95.00 fee11 IherlSo 8 Ih JO OeP.ee 31 mlrnloe 51 Oeew,61 Till+ TEST PIT LDCATIM Edl ID5.11 Int 10 0 Dolne, It-14 lh 61 OO.-02 mtruro.43..051St C.t1 as GO 1- 82 � _- \� Bz SP 1R.Of In+MSG -o,601.Far Lme M 0"MI-I c/o.Inv.to Me I f r ro+tm o � 51 I4TI5'E SANDY SOIL 61 ra.lu.a IT0.60 rw,otl M.mrwllm a levee rw,Yt..Ih.t Dolor..TIO I M.ewe., NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION Piro vurc.TEST LaATIM 02 vlMaa n eebvm[drt rnm,w Sw.thedlrnaly olort9 ell.rwe rol lo.lrq the ort or eD a5 1.-for o 41.1-O,92.15 leer 1.0 tOr,PtMil 1-Sou1h so OOT-Oa 57 19 T9 PRWDSED-w CQITC,DI I-EOA1 160 91 fe.f to o m'tts ttr thence S-M 22 Glome.47 nllUre.Ewt Got.OF LEACN FlT FL.52.OI' Is h-,EODIOQOf ARD$.r1.CCII• ITIS 123.00 Lwt 1.a+1-WIRo1 trace Salm 67 Oe(naee,J m:asr.a•.st 329 2 1-10 o JO i4•_., �� YA4 8N OF cngSAeATFrI 2a 75 Nvt"aD Lo'I. GId1wW/Y•CT 06 07] -- o.lnt,TMr¢e Not[2z Eepe..47 OIw11Ov W.e1 Ia. fpr f0 o wlntl ihm+O.SOY,.67 16 - "` -�•••. � / g'�D�SSLINGS 1 A 1 /Tr 6 S TEL IPE01.JJ•attP its 1060)62]+.9JL PROPOSED YINM CMTWbI oa�ao.is mlwlea rase 7,2.05 Feel fo 1'111 hole In I tM "of iM-Z-a F;~. J/ IeseM 5orPDl 17-.1e11.•ln.dM mov+oor1 or 0.10 cn 0-M th.f.11-In.11- -_ EXSRINO LWnI[RLTOUn No1n 12 1=.)6 alnutev Em1 MA 1-1 to.oil.note In.w.d-No,. IS - w• IS iJN FISN£R3 ISLAM GARBAGE d REFUSE DISTRICi� 57 Opera*1 mi-1..[m1 216.1 faet to a colp"Tarlo 15.00rem Ja mi-- EOa1 !4 ��••-'- �•�- r4 ' ' - BMKY WASTE TRANSFER FACILITY BUMOIP r 391.9 fol( o I w1nt,norm I epeoe AD mtmlea•ear st7.a Int too-11I wl.Ino CROSS SECTION OF LEACHING SYSTEM -_�• a Ek15TIN0 utNM CONiaae balder aM Norm It Oe0re.1 47 mlrwln.Ed1 221.5 1n1 10 o wMtt I--Swrh 62 SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN opyo.v 0a'mI-to E...210.61 foal to 0 ool- --o So-10 Opeee 14 mitvto9 SCALEI I'.S'ImRILMLLEII ECt1 54 OW!-28 e1 1"E.al 04.28 fast to TIM-t.t tho wint It bW;MIm. 1•.A' YICJL CISN[tS-AND TSO Y19iX wnl.InIm a.75 area.Doe o lata MA::r 10-1 Rot>wlce-Llb.rl 9}27 100o 701-SWIOIk CaNy Ot.txs MflFel 702.0) 9/9/99 sr¢T ND. SPT IS"10 CLIENT- ANCHOR ENGINEERING NEW ENGLAND BORING CONTRACTORS OF CT., INC. BORING No. B-1 129 KRIEGER LANE SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME: TRANSFER STATION GLASTONBURY,CT 06033 (860) 633-4649 -- (413) 733-1232 ARCHITECT/ PION: FISHERS ISLAND, NY FAX(8601 657-8046 ENGINEER DRILLER: J. Yarrow FILE NO ANCHORTR Casing Sampler Core Barrel I INSPECTOR. D. Garceau TYPE HSA SS SURFACE ELEV SIZE I.D. 4-114" 1-3/8" DATE START 4-9-98 HAMMER WT 140 LINE&STATION HAMMER FALL 30" DATE FINISH: 4-9-9 8 OFFSET SAMPLE CASING DEPTH BLOWS PER 6" BLOWS! Well Installation ON SAMPLER CORING FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS Cons. Details No. RANGE REC. TIMES IN FEET 0-6 6-12 112 18 18-24 PER FT. S1 0'-2' 4 4 4 5 3" Light Brown Silty Fine Sand, Trace of Fine Gravel . 3 Brown Fine - Coarse Sand and Gravel, Some S2 5'-7' 17 16 16 11 7" Cobbles, Little Silt S3 10'-12' 9 6 4 6 12" 11 Light Brown Silt, Some Fine Sand, Trace of Fine Gravel is S4 15'-17' 22 14 17 19 16" Gray/Brown, Fine Sand, Little Silt, Trace of Fine Gravel 20'-21'5" 13 16 100/ 6" -5� --- - 21.4 End of Boring @ 21'5" Water @ 18' +/- r NOTES: 1 I rhe stratification Innes represent the 2)Water lever readings have been made REMARKS: anprornmeta botrrdery between soli in the dull holes at times and under types Trenarlons may be gradual. conditions stated on the boring logs puctuahons in Iha laud of g—rd- NEW ENGLAND BORING CONTRACTORS,OF CT., INC. BORING No. B-2 CLIENT: ANCHOR ENGINEERING SHEET 1 OF 1 129 KRIEGER LANE PROJECT NAME: TRANSFER STATION GLASTONBURY,CT 06033 (860)633-4649 — (413)733-1232 ARCHITECT/ LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND, NY FAX(860)657-8046 ENGINEER FILE NO. ANCHORTR r%R11 LER: J. Yarrow Casing Sampler Core Barrel ,'ECTOR: D. Garceau TYPE HSA SS SURFACE ELEV. SIZE I.D. 4-114" 1.318" LINE&STATION DATE START 4-9-9 8 HAMMER WT. 140 HAMMER FALL 30" OFFSET DATE FINISH- 4-9-98 SAMPLE CASING BLOWS/ Well Installation DEPTH BLOWS PER 6- CORING FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS Cons. Details No. RANGE ON SAMPLER REC. TIMES IN FEET 0-6 1 6-12 12-18 18-24 PER FT. S1 0'-2' 8 10 6 4 8" Brown Fine Coarse Sand, Some Fine - Coarse Gravel, Little Silt, Occ. Cobbles, Boulders, Brick, Scrap Metal, etc. S2 5'-5'6" 100/ 6" 6" 10 S3 10'-12' 25 16 11 9 8" Brown Fine - Coarse Sand, Some Fine - Coarse Gravel, Little Silt, Few Cobbles S4 15'-17' 8 10 23 60 12" S5 20'-22' 32 11 11 12 12" 22 End of Boring @ 22' Water @ 18' +/ • I I I - I I I `I a NOTES: 1 I Tha sueuhoeuon Imes tnpresent the 2)water level teadings have been made REMARKS: j apptosimala bounda,y between sal to the drill hates et times end umfe, types Ttnnsnons may be gtedud eenditions stated on the batng Topa. 1 Flaewetlons to the level of ground 111 ..to may Dotal due to lectors otho tMn tMse p,esent et the 1—mens utements was made NEW ENGLAND BORING CONTRACTORS OF CT., INC. BORING No. B-3 ..i-IENT: ANCHOR ENGINEERING SHEET 1 of 1 129 KRIEGER LANE GLASTONBURY,CT 06033 ARCHITECT/ PROJECT NAME: TRANSFER STATION (8601633-4649 -- (4131733-1232 ENGINEER FAX(8601 657-8046 --"1oN FISHERS ISLAND, NY FILE NO. ANCHORTR A: J. Yarrow Casing Sampler Core Barrel SURFACE ELEV. TYPE HSA Ss INSPECTOR: D. Garceatl SIZE I.D. 4.114" 1-3f8" LINE&STATION HAMMER WT 140 DATE START: 4-9-9 8 HAMMER FALL 30" OFFSET DATE FINISH: 4-9-9 8 SAMPLE BLOW CASING G Well Installation DEPTH BLOWS PER 6" CORING FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS Cons. Details RANGE ON SAMPLER REC. TIMES No. IN FEET 0-6 6-12 12-18 18-24 PER FT. S1 0'-2' 5 8 9 7 10" Brown Fine - Coarse Sand an dGravel, Little Cobbles, Trace of Silt 5 S2 5'-7' 4 4 6 11 16" Gray Brown Fine Sand, Some Silt, Trace of Fine Gravel S3 10'-12' 3 5 11 17 13" 73 End of Boring @ 13', Refusal No Water I g 3. int+ s-= l I The matlflution line tepesent the 21 wet=level re"gs have been made REMARKS: aDpodmate bwndaty between foil In the drill biles at tunes and utile R,c types:Ttertaitmns may be gmdud. cundidens.rated on the bor lrq lops. •r jy'r- Ructuadom In the level of ptourd late,may o ,due to lwtas aha tiwsa p,esent at the time rneas- yt., u,aments wee made _ BORING No. B-4 NEW ENGLAND BORING CONTRACTORS OF CT., IN TSHEET 1 OF 1 CLIENT: ANCHOR ENGINEERING 12a KRIEGER LANE GLASTONBURY,CT 06033 ARCHITECT/ • PROJECT NAME: TRANSFER STATION -1232(ggp)633-4649 - (413)733 ENGINEER FAX 18601 857-8046 LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND, NY FILE NO. ANCHORTR Sampler Core Barrel Casing Sa DRILLER: J. Yarrow SS SURFACE ELEV. TYPE HSA INSPECTOR: D. GarCeau 4-114" 1-3/8" LINE&STATION SIZE I.D. 140 HAMMER WT. 30" DATE START: 4-9-9 8 HAMMER FALL OFFSET DATE FINISH: 4-9-9 8 CASING Well Installation SAMPLE BLOWS/ Cons. Details DEPTH BLOWS PER 6" CORING FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS RANGE ON SAMPLER REC. TIMES No. IN FEET 0-6 6-12 12-18 18-24 PER FT. Brown Fine Sand, Some Silt, Little Fine Gravel, S1 0'-2' 3 5 10 21 12" Few Cobbles 5 S2 5' 7' 18 13 14 16 16" Gray Brown Fine Sand and Silt, Little Fine Gravel, Occ. Cobbles S3 10'-12' 10 18 12 13 14" to t End of Boring @ 14', Auger Refusal No Water i I I t , 41 ,I 1 �4 t ,III al 'I I' w 1' r NOTES: 1 I The nrelihwtian buts tepasent ttn 21 whet I-el readings rove been made REMARKS: The w-tifio boundary between w,i In tha drill hdn at tunes and undal .w„� conditions sated on the baling lops NEW ENGLAND BORING CONTRACTORS OF CT., INC. BORING No. B-5 CLIENT: ANCHOR ENGINEERING SHEET 1 OF 1 129 KRIEGER LANE PROJECT NAME: TRANSFER STATION GLASTONBURY,CT 06033 ARCHITECTI (8601633-4649 -- (413)733-1232 ENGINEER LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND, NY FAX(860)657-8046 FILE NO. ANCHORTR LER: J. Yarrow Casing Sampler Care Barrel INSPECTOR: D. Garceau TYPE HSA Ss SURFACE ELEV. SIZE I.D. 4-1/4" 1-918" LINE&STATION DATE START: 4-9-9 8 HAMMER WT. 140 DATE FINISH: 4-9-9 8 HAMMER FALL 30" OFFSET SAMPLE CASING WS PER 6" BLOWS/ Well Installation BLOWS CORING FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS Cons. Details No. RANGE ON SAMPLER REC. TIMES IN FEET -07T&-L2 12-18 18-24 PER FT. S1 0'-2' 5 14 11 9 6" Gray Brown Fine Sand, Some Silt, Little Fine Gravel, Few Cobbles S2 5'-7' 2 3 3 5 2- S3 "S3 1,0'-12' 5 5 7 9 10" iz End of Boring @ 12' No Water I I 1 I I --- NOTES: 11 The stradlrcetian lines ralpnent threadye 21 Water lava! tqs neve been made REMARKS: approximate boundary between sal In the drill fides at tunes and undn types T,.—uons may be g,aduel conditions o wi ns stated atedin [o the WIN 1092 FluoI O Ward• may ay occur due to Ixlers othv than those present at the time meas• utartlents ware made SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES For Office Use Only OFFICE OF WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT SUFFOLK COUNTY CENTER - RIVERHEAD,NY 11901 Health Department Ref.No. (516) 852-2100 APPLICATION FOR SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES AND WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS FOR OTHER THAN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES 8-0863..8/96 This application is for(check all that apply): New Construction [, ] Addition to Building [ ] Extension of Existing Permit [ ] Food Establishment ] Change in Use [ ] Revision of Approved Plan ( ] Renewal of Expired Permit [ ] Other Briefly Describe the Proposal And Usc(s)of Building: 0(-DN Si R2C.';' A 3d X X51 GARA6E/6FF1(-F GbjLblAC-j(iI. 505F) )5.0,e !E5TMAGE- OF A &NLY lAoC ANS v�oc�c.Ntr Q�R SECTION 1 Business or Facility Name Hamlet Town 1=tS4AE7S =SLA:�:b GAR96C-,E gnlb REFUSE DtSTR1CY FSikr--!RS T-SLANG Sv0—' %A )L6 Property Location:N6VW side of Fo X LANE Feet N/S/E6of W14)ST1.-R ASF OR N/S/E/W Corner of and District(s) Section(s) Block(s) Lot(s) Tax Map No.: - , la�o l � Name of Applicant Telephone No. F�S'�-4ERS iS1A�1'J ( ARBAFiE A -eEFuSE bj5,P,1C-r TTawg ot= b� 78a 74 S.5 Address: PC), BOY- Z2 FISq-ERS �ESLAN!�, I Ny Name of Design Professional (If Not Applicant) Telephone No. 1�nIc1 R cN�,1�/cEQt�vii S>=�v,'ccs �c 1?60 633-9776 Address: 7� dUTME6 LAA/E , GLA S-I&AJ 8012- Name of Property Owner(If Not Applicant) Telephone No. lDWnl OF 660T1401-b NY (,516 )765-1861 Address: Pt), 8DX 1179 N y //qr? Name of Agent(If Not Applicant) Telephone No. /JCt va FQC,INF=i=L't/V s>=Rv►�CS 0160 ) 33- 8?` Address: Name of Industrial Park, ubdivision and/or shopping center(if applicable) Previous Health Department Reference No(s). NOT 1PPi.1 c ABt,E I A/A Gallons Per Day of Sewage Discharge Town'Zoning of Occupancy Rating as Total Area of Parcel Total Gross Floor Area of Building(s) O Parcel per Building Code (Acres) Existing Existing () Proposed 99 R_ I (SEE PAGEti) Proposed t✓5U St' Specify Method of Water Supply. Distance To Water Main&Name of Nearest Public Water District: 1 . Public [ ]Private Well IDD Ff F1 Sr4,ERS 5iLA,�b YVA'1F,e CO. `specify Method of Sewage Disposal. Distance To&Name of Nearest Public Sewer District or Treatment Plant: IN Subsurface Disposal(conventional) ( ]Public Scwers ( ]Other(explain) WWM-004 (Rev. 9/96) Pape 1 of.) SECTION 2 -- APP-164gc.l= FOR CHANGE 1N USE OF AN EXISTING BUILDING ONLY. Site & floor plans will be required for review. t'-cvious Name(s).'rype of Business and date last open. Floor Area of Proposed Business Date Building Constructed FOR FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS ONLY. Type of Seats Bar Restaurant Catering Outdoor Number of Seats Permitted in Previous Establishment Number of Seats in Proposed Establishment SECTION 3 FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STORAGE OR DISCHARGE YES NO 1. Is or will wastewater, other than sewage, be discharged into the ground? v If yes explain 2. Is or will oil be stored for heating purposes? If yes, indicate the number , size of oil tank(s) in gallons & year installed 6NF t ZSD C�ALt G� Dt� TANK �N -,nc AIQW AV)LbWC- Si=E P.4ue 3. Docs the business(es) require process tanks or petroleum storage tanks such as gasoline, kerosene, diesel, gasohol, motor oil, antifreeze, or waste oil? If yes, indicate number aboveground & number underground X Indicate materials that are being stored 4. Does or will the business(es) have more than 250 gallons of drum storage? If yes, indicate number of drums and amount of gallons 5. Does or will the business(es) have collection sumps, troughs, floor drains, boiler drains, etc.? If yes explain 6. Does or will the business(es) involve any manufacturing processes or use of any chemicals? if yes explain If the answer to any of the above questions in section 3 are yes, then permit(s) for hazardous material storage or discharge may be necessary in accordance with Article 7 and 12 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code and a separate report may be required. Contact the Office of Pollution Control (516) 854-2501. SECTION 4 OTHER PERMITS REQUIRED YES NO 1. Are any of the following permits required? a. Wild Scenic and Recreation Rivers Permit- NYSDEC b. Long Island Well/Water Supply Permit- NYSDEC �( c. Tidal Wetlands Permit d. Fresh Water Wetlands Permit X c. SPDES-D Permit, sanitary waste only - SCDI-IS/NYSDEC X( f. SPDES Permit - industrial Waste - SCDIIS/NYSDEC �( g. Toxic and Hazardous Materials Storage/Handling, Article 12, SCDI-IS X Page 2 of'4 WWM-004 (Rev. 9/96) SECTION 5 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND HEALTH REVIEW YES NO 1. Is the property located within or substantially contiguous to a locally or county designated Critical Environmental Arca (CEA) pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) and 6NYC121t 617 (SEQRA)? 2. is any portion of the subject property in a "Coastal Erosion llazard Arca" (pursuant to 6NYCRIZ Part 505) or subject to imnfinent erosion or flooding? X If yes, show area on plans and/or explain 3. Is the property located within the area designated Central Pine Barrens Core v Preservation Area pursuant to Article 57 of the ECL? 4. Has a determination of Environmental Significance (Negative or Positive Declaration) been issued by any other permitting :agency for this project? / ` If yes,provide copy of determination and/or details. 5. Has a determination been made by any other permitting agency that this project is a Type I action pursuant to SEQRA? If yes, explain 6. Will the completed project routinely produce odors, or operating noise which exceeds the local ambient noise levels? If yes, explain 7. Has the property ever been used for the disposal of solid waste or hazardous waste? •� If yes, show area on plans and/or explain /� 8. Are there any existing environmental factors which may affect the public health and safety of the completed project's occupants (for example, neighboring landfills, petroleum spills, toxic materials, noise sources, odors, etc.)? X If yes, explain 9. Is the subject property within 100' of any surface ivater(s) or wetland(s)? Y If yes, show on plans. w/14 IM' of L,'.L- -c;wg6, 5EG A-4ACIifR� mAP /` 10. Is the parcel subject to existing covenants or restrictions? If yes, explain 11. Does the project requite a change in zoning or a zoning variance? If yes, explain 12. Is there a public water wellfield within 1,500 feet of property boundaries? If yes, show on plans. APPLICATION 1S HEREBY MADE FOR A PERMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS APPLICATION, SURVEY(S AND PLAN(S) SUBMITTED. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION ON ALL THE PAGES OF THIS APPLICAT101, AND ALL THE ATTACHMENTS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY ME AND THAT, BASED ON MY INQUIRIES, S1Tl 1NVESTIGATION(S) AND/OR OTHER STUDY(IES), 1 BELIEVE THAT THE INFORMATION 1S TRUE, ACCURATI AND COMPLETE. I UNDERSTAND THAT FALSE STATEMENTS MADE HEREIN ARE PUNISHABLE AS A CLAS A MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO SECTION 210.45 OF THE PENAL LAW. Property Owner's Signature Print Name Date Applicant's Si�11nature Print Name Date Design Prolessional's SiOnanire Print Name AAP K �;l % c��,� License fi 'J'`l t-26Date `J i \VwM-004 liie% 9.961 RAT'Nc C,ArA5eIDFFt-CC 611—b%k ►'lAS 2 DFFrCES Or= TI�TAL Sr = 35S PF-F, BOCA USE 15 SF/P2fSc)AS FvR OFFICE_ W/TABLaS & CNA►PS 355 SF s sF/P �, 23 (Vc)pz r ASSUME a VQCpLE IA 44uujA/S / W-WRcO ( A 44q4�e -rkfEP-I-r- eE , 7-HE accupwcY Rorvt,6 As pee 86CA = 03 SFC-nm 3 - qUE Si la,4 2 • bnl 825)99 ANci4o2 �,uc;Inlc,E�?'�v� aXF w,rN PiegVb 1914je&',EL OF VE 5UrPOLK bEPA27-MFN7 6F 11�---4L7-771 -<�F)evIC'eS OFRCE of PouurloA CoMTRDL ® PFR `rte OFFIcr- 6F POLLI -MAJ Coni i RoL 1VD PR-M ITS ARE AIECE5 SAR`( FOR TIA=- 11VS?ALLATIOA) Anr b 1j5C of 14 IkA-r IAA� 0 IL T-A/v K �nl S r DC .�( av L D IN C-r Pi?bv,D EI) TN-9T SIS OF 7?jf 7AN 1C 15 NdT h lZE 7F P, T14AN 25D (34 LLD/J S TG1r Ski a-F .Tif--- a(L 5ivRA5F- -TANK AT r�-fC- NEW BLALb(M G (s 25a 64 LLav S 18-0863..8/96 This page intentionally left blank for additional comments WWM-004 (Rev. 9/96) Page 4 of 4 9-07-1999 1 0= 1 dAM FROM ANCHOR E.NC;)Nttld 1 N6 bb0b.:S 3b`d• / I r 16.16.$EP_07 199 09=54Art SWTHOLD TOWN HAL. 516 765 1823 P.2 NEW Vohs&STATE D1►ARTA4NT O/1NVIRONMENTAt CONSIRVATION NRO)ECT ID NUMR[R a DIVISION OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS nkat*tElnvormimal Quality Raises SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNUSTED ACTIONS Only PART 1 PtOj*ct lfftr*atlen(To be Colnp)etvd by Applicant or project sponsor) 1 App1:e.Ml+Oa we J rw cl Naas ' , _ 15+4E 5 15LA>,1D �iA��!'�QC-1� R£Fvic �tS BuLK WASTE 1?AN5i-ry j::AC,%L1TY guo t,JCj J. rroroct location: A%Ricbal;ty F%faVA ;T 4IUlD� caian SJ!-1=CL K a Is,pr ed actblr Ncw ❑ Eapalet{on ❑ Med�eead&nphrgtba S. D.ecrebe p.Oj.R b.tefty C,t�NS-rRvG'T 3D X:S51 hARAGEAFICE AND 1.NsT,4LL APP�KTEA Q'T RU1LbiA1C1 U-Ei1 i Vi 5 . Cwp sTpwcrj PAvr n PARKINC-j ARFAI CDAJCRF,1—E SiAIrWAQK AND PERFORM SITE (;RAN/46i • ►naiad Iocatl0n bond i(terxct.ont Prominenl landmarks.etc of Prov/&map) FtSV-F_9S ::GLAND 1DvT"N &AE OF FoX UTNE ! _�z) FEET WiFsT vF 1' ,4)STLEj; AvE F Amount of land.Hpc". 1 Ia.ually ..cyst U►bm.tOy Ara, a. w.n proposed aeteon eomolf.;t""'".o...ep or pthw errT;ne land mm restrkt mo _WY,. ❑ Nu if No.dncnbv bn&fly ACCEPT—wD BY larv)n1C-i GDARD TIARtx)GjH T6W tI EA6)A)j:-,FP f wjfa -101111101164 use m vec:n.W of pro)ety .0 Ra.tls"41 Q Iodul,Mil ❑ Cwwmrci l ❑ ARnituhuH ❑ r.Mdandlpp.r,.pin� ❑ Exher Desp;b&• 10 Does action Involve a tlapproval.a fuAdma,aow Of e.ltlrnatpy.Iron grey eller aovernn.enlal atf.aey LFeaera4 snu a teeAlp X Vet LJ No It Ya.list aSeMtG)end pehnitivP'.ab AN AFVi1CATlaJ WAS ScNi ,a lVysJ)rc wR FuPID'vVL`j" 1t Do14 oees gay aspect of&&.tt: sr ahove•cutr.rtty valid pasmit a aopfevOU Teo ❑ No N yes,list agmcV aame and prin.tlapproval tWw NysDF C S�I.,n u�4� E SRM 1-r 11 At atuh o1 act.wt WW t&Is"I panntl*WOVZl rpyire rrod;f:at•enl ❑ yes Ma I CIRTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION►ItOVIDED AbOv1 IS TRUE TO THE WST OF MT KNOWL•DCE A&ollcsnytporoy nares. _ M n.e K 1 ,• Z �s9,V � �"' t� /7 � /QNCf(l.� �nIG•NEfKl�( `>f�ZV., /NC . S:Vytu,e: Ml-4 n P, G(a SCLN b,r C-% J 1 _Q6C 6.77U It the 40jon It In IM CO"tal Area. and you M a state apsnryr oomoaft the Coastal Awoo went Porn: baba pEoam4n atth thin aaesaentent OVER 9-07-1999 1 O: 1 dAM FROM ANCHOR ENG 1 Nttl•11 NCS bbWb.3.35y/ 1 r SEp 07 •99 09:54AM SOUTHOLD TOWN HPLC 516 765 1823 P.3 PART II 9mr1ra "hist Assessment(To be completed by Agencyl A Doef Odra",scald ANY Typo I thrWhold In i NVCRIt,Pad 107121 It ypL tiwdL%y the 0010"aroau a"d yea 16 rULULOW.FOxM IAF. ❑ Yle ❑ Na 0.Wdi acUorr rKNre coordlnattd nrim at pror.ded fm Unlined Actions in i NyCRa.PSA 417.71 It NM a nagative dKlaratrvn A"V be sypNaded by avow mvoNtd acdon ❑ Y0 ❑ No C Coyld action rr►Y1t in ANY atvene efkCb P%eq OF ar:s;ng beer tae follawAS(Anr"erf may be>•and.r;nsan it 4abw C1. Errininr air oyahty.wAaea W atObnd"aWf Qyst;ly Or oyan{fty,nogg I&GI,edttiq traffic paltgrns wild.ensu production or dupeeal,poNntrai for erode", dramagr at 000d;ng p9blern0l rap)e;a britfy. Ca. Mistor;c,aichooloalcal,vmw or autaetic,Of Wirer natyral or cAWral refayrcm ar kwitwal dknrlctl or eommymty or r4ishborhow character)Lxela;n br'nily. Q Y011rtat:an of laune,me-er ant 91111%of VnldiNe,spec'm riendkant hab uo.Or Arratmed ot tnd MrW spot off!,plan bristly. Ca A commun>tyc eant;na pl►m or soars as orl.cr8117 3119060,Of a change.n rue Of;neOm1Y or use of lend or odyn natural rrimnssi IzOlain brkny CS Crv+rA sybseouent drreiopmp0t or rejaw ectrr:un iiady to be Ifi&wd b►the pmpwo agog!IaWln briny. C4.Secorkam cumulatwe.at other of Not not 1dem.f:N In Ctt4)tapls;n briefly C7. A change W u»of e;Iho quanstty ar lype Or errergvt teplalp briefly PARI 1)) DN MI11sltlon 018fp1111601M(To be completed by Asency) INSTRUCTION!, For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether it Is substantial, largo.Important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in coruwtion with its,(a)setting(i.e.urban or ruralk(b)probability of occurring; (c)duration;td)irreversibillty:(e)geographic scopes and(f)magnitude.If necessary,add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain wfficlent detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequateiy addressed ❑ Check this box it you have Identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAV occur.Then proceed directly to the FVILILONG FORM EAF and/or prepare a positive dedaretron ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information end analysis above and arty supporting documentation, that the proposed att.on WILL NOT mwit In any significant adverse environmental Impacts AND provide hero, and on attachments as necafary, the reasons supportng this determination. Aarrrey Nanh Agency pre'par'ars Name p^DarKf SlMaturrr1111! tea U t ' _DEC 04 1989 I '4�►o --------------------------- Robert J. Gaffney Suffolk County Executive Department of Health Services Clare B. Bradley,M.D., MPH Office of Wastewater Management Commissioner 516 852-2100 PERMIT Health Services Reference#L 1(q q Project Name f n/�&2 s The attached plan, when duly signed by a representative of the department, constitutes a permit to construct a water supply and/or a sewage disposal or collection system for the property as depicted.The applicant should take note of any conditions of approval,which may be indicated on the plan or enclosed herein. Construction must conform with applicable standards including "Standards for Approval of Plans and Construction for Sewage Disposal Systems for Other than Single Family Residences." Omissions or lack of detail on the plan do not release the applicant from the responsibility of having the construction done in conformance with applicable standards. The permit(plan)expires three(3)years after the approval date. Any modification which may affect the proposed sewage disposal or water supply systems requires submission of a revised plan and additional fees(if applicable) for reapproval prior to construction. No inspections will be performed by the department on expired permits. Permits may be renewed, extended, transferred, or revised in accordance with the procedures described in Instructions to Renew, Extend, or Transfer an Existing Permit for Other than Single Family Residences (Form WWM-018). It is the applicant's responsibility to call the department in advance to arrange inspections of the sewage disposal and/or water supply facilities prior to backfilling. These include inspections of the sewage collection and disposal systems, water supply system components and piping, and final grading as shown on the approved plans. In certain cases, inspections of the soil excavation may be required to determine the acceptability of the soils for sewage disposal systems. The department must be notified at least 48 hours in advance to schedule an inspection; and excavation inspections must also be confirmed by calling 852-2100 prior to 9:30am, the morning of the inspection. Final approval issued by the Department is necessary prior to the occupancy of new buildings, additions to existing buildings, or for the use of sewage disposal or water supply systems. WWM-016 (Rev.;/15/99) Page 1 of 2 Project Name pOH__ �-~�'jQ� Health Services.Reference# CONDITIONS FOR OBTAINING FINAL APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTED PROJECT As a condition of this permit to construct, the following items must be completed as a minimum, prior to building occupancy and use of the sewage disposal system or water supply facilities. For further information concerning this,refer to Instructions For Obtaining Final Health Department Approval Of Constructed Projects For Other Than Single Family Residences(Form WWM-19). Excavation Inspection by the Office of Wastewater Management prior to installation of any leaching pools to determine acceptability of soils. ( Call 852-2097 to schedule an inspection � and confirm by calling 852-2100 prior to 9:3 Oam, the morning of the inspection.) E /Satisfactory inspection by Office of Wastewater Management of the sewage disposal system (Call 852-2097 to schedule an inspection.) u Satisfactory'inspection of the water supply system by: u Office of Wastewater Management(Call 852-2097 to schedule an inspection.) Office of Water Resources, Water Quality Unit( Call 853-2250 for inspection.) El Satisfactory inspection by the Office of Pollution Control ( Call 854-2502 for inspection.) El Sewage treatment plant Storage tanks El Other: Q1Four 4 prints of an As-Built plan "Tap letter" from water district El-Certification from the licensed sewage disposal system installer "S-9 form"from Suffolk County Department of Public Works (SCDPW) El Sewer district approval of sewer line installation(for other than SCDPW districts) 13 Well drillers certificate El Water analysis El Design Professionals Certification of Constructed Works (form WWM-073) for: 11 Sewer lines and sewage collection system El Retaining walls (approved as part of the sewage disposal system) El Sewage pump station/valve chamber 11 Sub-surface sewage disposal system F1 Sewage treatment plant El Water supply system Abandonment of Preexisting sewage disposal system and/or water supply Other: El Other: f WWlVI-016 (Rev.;/15/99) Page 2 of 2 (1)EXCAVATE FOR LEACHING PIT. (2)HAND RAKE THE SIDES OF THE EXCAVATION TO ELIMINATE ANY SOIL SMEARS ON TRENCH WALLS BEFORE PLACING LEACHING PIT. (3)INSTALL 6'CONCRETE FOOTING BASE RING. LOWER IN-LEACHING PIT UNIT.AND BACKFILL LEACHING PIT WITH 2%'TO 4-STONE AROUND SIDES AND COVER AREA WITH A MIN.6'LAYER OF TOPSOIL. (4)FINE GRADE AREA TO THE PROPOSED GRADES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. It BACKFnAJM SYSTEM INSTALLATION PRIOR TO BACKFILLING,INSTALLED SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES AND SEWERS SHALL BE INSPECTED AND AUTHORIZED FOR BACKFILLING BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL BE NOTIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF SCHEDULED BACKFILLING.BACKFILLING PRIOR TO DEPARTMENT INSPECTION WILL RESULT IN AN ORDER BY THE COMMISSIONER TO REMOVE ALL BACKFILL FdW INSPECTION. THESE REOUIREMENTS WILL NOT BE WAIVED BY THE DEPARTMENT. 1L WATER SUPPLY- THE ONSITE BUILDING IS SERVEC BY A P:BL-C WATER LIP:: %'OWN ON THE PLAN. 12 NEIGHBORING WELLS THERE ARE NO WELLS WITHIN 150 FEET OF THE PROPOSED SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM EXISTING BUILDINGS ON ADJACENT PROPERTY ARE SERVED BY PUBLIC WATER. 13.FOOTING PERIMETER DRAIN r� r .-,` �s. ;�,'; by i�i O THE DNSITE BUILDING HAS NO FOOTING DRAINS. uter ffriCs m.3SI fie 1I _.ti::s Suffo4f; ©Ull"}Sf Grp. GS se!Aces. V r to sdf iedufe rl�;�;;?:� • °��,�::�. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION ONLY �r H.S. REF N0. C-10` Sal— /Z FLOW G� TYPE CL This approval is granted for the consIn-Uion of th© sm#fary %f` �`y,- disposal and water supply bcfflides pursuart to Auricles V3 and { ,T o 7 of ftSUfifatt COtWy Sardtary Cod?Md is not an e*ressad 4-�, z troz Wood appro%Tl to disctia..Te Brom or CCCUp'1+ U* WUTIUM(s) SI1(=. THIS APPROVAL EXPIRES THREE (3) YEAFROM THE DATE BELOW.LLJ IA)j GATE SItaNATUt;E rf��I��•�• . NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION Anchor Engineering Services., Inc. 75 Nutmeg Lane Glastonbury, CT 06033 TEL (860) 633-8770 FAX (860) 633-5971 n PR)J. ENGINEER DMD PRDJ. MANAGER LJM FISHERS ISLAND GARBAGE d REFUSE DISTRICT OFFICE REVIEW MMZ BULKY WASTE TRANSFER FACILITY BUILDING c• REVISIONS SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN FISHERS ISLAND NEW YORK PROJECT DATE cALE. AS NOTED 207-03 g/g/gg SHEET NO. SPT APPENDIX G FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT SITE REDEVELOPMENT FISHERS ISLAND, NEW • ' PRE CONSTRUMON ENVMONMENUAL NVESTMA70N REPORT PREPARED FOR: Fishers Island Waste Management District PO Box 22 Fishers Island,New York 06390 PREPARED BY: P.W.Grosser Consulting,Inc. 630 Johnson Avenue,Suite 7 Bohemia,New York 11716 Phone:631-589-6353 Fax:631-589-8705 Andrew Lockwood,LEP,Principal andrewl@pwgrosser.com Ryan Morley,Sr.Hydrogeologist ryanm@pwgrosser.com PWGC Project Number:FIW1601 JANUARY ' PWGC=& Strategic Environmental Engineering Solutions PRE CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION REPORT FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Site Description.............................................................................................................................1 1.2 Site Background ..................................................................................................................:.........1 1.3 Proposed redevelopment.............................................................................................................2 1.4 Standards,Criteria, and Guidance (SCG).......................................................................................3 2.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES........................................................................................................................................4 2.1 Geophysical Investigation.............................................................................................................4 2.2 Soil Characterization.....................................................................................................................5 3.0 FINDINGS....................................................................................................................................................7 3.1 Soil Characterization.....................................................................................................................7 3.2 Geophysical Investigation.............................................................................................................7 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................9 4.1 Conclusions...................................................................................................................................9 4.1.1 Soil Sampling Conclusions.................................................................................................9 4.1.2 Geophysical Survey Conclusions.......................................................................................9 4.2 Recommendations........................................................................................................................9 TABLES Table 1 Soil Sampling Summary Table 1 Soil Sample Analytical Results—Explosive Residues Table 2 Soil Sample Analytical Results—Metals FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Former Battery Locations Figure 2 Soil Sampling and Geophysical Survey Locations APPENDICES Appendix A Geophysical Report Appendix B Laboratory Analytical Reports P.W.Grosser Consulting•630 Johnson Avenue,Suite 7•Bohemia,NY 11716 i PH 631.589.6353•FX 631.589.8705•www.pwgrosser.com New York,NY•Syracuse,NY•Seattle,WA•Shelton,CT PWGC= Strategic Environmental Engineering Solutions ACRONYM ACRONYM DEFINITION AMTB Anti-Motor Torpedo Boat ASP Analytical Services Protocol CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensations and Liability Act COPC Contaminants of Potential Concern ELAP Environmental Laboratory Approval Program EM Electro-Magnetic FIWMD Fishers Island Waste Management District FUDS Formerly Used Defense Site GPS Global positioning System Hz Hertz ID Identification MDL Method Detection Limit MEC Munitions and Explosives of Concern mm millimeter my millivolt NYCRR New York Codes, Rules, and Regulations NYS New York State NYSDEC New York State Department of Environmental Conservation NYSDOH New York State Department of Health SCG Standards,Criteria, and Guidance SCO Soil Cleanup Objective Si Site Investigation TAL Target Analyte List USACOE United States Army Corp of Engineers USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency UXO Unexploded Ordinance P.W.Grosser Consulting• 630 Johnson Avenue,Suite 7• Bohemia,NY 11716 PH 631.589.6353• FX 631.589.8705•www.pwgrosser.com New York,NY•Syracuse,NY•Seattle,WA•Shelton,CT 1.0 INTRODUCTION P.W. Grosser Consulting, Inc. (PWGC) has prepared this Report to document the findings of our Environmental Investigation for the Fishers Island Waste Management District(FIWMD) in Fishers Island, NY. The scope of work was based upon PWGC's Pre-Construction Environmental Investigation Work Plan for the site dated December 2, 2016, and PWGC's proposal for services dated October 27, 2016. 1.1 Site Description The subject property is located on the western point of Fishers Island. The properties office is located on the western end of Whistler Avenue however, the site does not have a formal street address. The site is bounded by Fox Lane to the northeast, by the Long Island Sound to the northwest, and by Elizabeth Field Airport to the south. The subject property measures approximately 12.5 acres and is improved with a two story office house and garage,as well as the remnants of a US Army fort,including subgrade batteries and bunkers. The site is currently operated by The FIWMD, and is currently an operational waste transfer station. A Site Location Map is included as Figure 1. Figure 1—Site Location Map A PWGC SIMLOCAMN - WA3TE7E f IMNAG EMBIf [YSiRiCi 3Ae tlalNry 1.2 Site Background The planned development site is located within the boundaries of the former Fort H.G. Wright. The site is in the Defense Environmental Restoration Program for Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS). The site is currently listed P.W. Grosser Consulting • 630 Johnson Avenue, Suite 7• Bohemia, NY 11716 1 PH 631.589.6353 • FX 631.589.8705•www.pwgrosser.com New York, NY•Syracuse, NY•Seattle, WA•Shelton, CT as a New York State(NYS) Inactive Waste Site(#152241)and the Site Inspection (SI) Report prepared by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) recommended that a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) be performed under the Comprehensive, Environmental Response, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The Report Concluded: o The FIWMD re-development site is part of the area designated as Munitions Response Site 1(MRS 1). o Limited sampling was performed at the four batteries located within the area to be re-developed by the FIWMD. ® Sampling results exceeded New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Part 370 Unrestricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives(SCO)for several metals. o Limited Geophysical reconnaissance was conducted along the western side of the former battery locations. No subsurface anomalies were noted in the vicinity of batteries; Butterfield, Barlow, Hamilton,or Hoffman. ® The report concluded a "low to moderate" risk for Munitions and Explosives of Concern (MEC) within MRS 1. o Recommendation was made in the SI Report for additional investigation (RI/FS) of the site(focusing on MEC) under CERCLA. The RI/FS has not been completed. No analytes associated with past munitions uses were reported in the SI Report at levels exceeding the United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA)Preliminary Remediation Goals(PRG) screening values or NYSDEC Part 375 Commercial Use SCOs. Several metals exceeded the NYSDEC unrestricted use SCOs. Former battery designations within the FIWMD include batteries;AMTB 913, Butterfield, Barlow, Hamilton,and Hoffman. Proposed development work is limited to the areas around batteries; AMTB 913, Butterfield and- Barlow. Battery AMTB 913 is located south of Battery Butterfield and was reportedly buried during the Fort's closure activities and therefore was not investigated as part of the SI. The Final Site Inspection Report,USACOE, September 2007, identified these three batteries as using large caliber munitions (37 mm and larger). The location of the Batteries is provided in Figure 2. 1.3 Proposed redevelopment The development includes the construction of several new buildings (Maintenance Building, Mixing Building, Swap Shop Building, and two sheds), refurbishment of the existing concrete retaining walls, and installation of truck scales,storm water basin and re-grading of the site. Proposed site improvements and grading plans are included in Appendix A. P.W.Grosser Consulting•630 Johnson Avenue,Suite 7• Bohemia, NY 1.1716 2 PH 631.589.6353•FX 631.589.8705•www.pwgrosser.com New York,NY•Syracuse,NY•Seattle,WA•Shelton,CT Figure 2—Former Battery Locations PWGC B.e.ry FOBma � -" V en x.mnro � - _ :'j Mimerxss ar ) O.nery 3uterlielf u-1 R.ny.el lAOc t' Rah 1 I - •.2ro.ncs __ _ MB.nerY np.sr ~mss n o..a.ew. 6anery M.., erl.yBefoQrcc+mlRSBwrvaaY-eaeenessmriarn:weBe FORMER BATTERY e«.rv:1f i—_IFwSBau tlary LOCATIONS rv0ynanih nal.Anm R.npe Nl F"'frtYlwEpns FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Sowce'.S Insgc Repot b Fw HG" ANpn Gciaua a T-kW r.0 neve Z 1.4 Standards,Criteria,and Guidance(SCG) Based on previous investigations at the site, the primary chemicals of potential concern (COPC) to be encountered at the site are organic compounds and metals (e.g. arsenic, lead, antimony) associated with munitions use. Based upon the current redevelopment plans for the site (commercial), commercial use SCOs as specified in NYSDEC 6 NYCRR Part 375 and USEPA PRG screening values were used to evaluate soil quality. In addition to chemicals associated with past munitions use there is a potential for unexploded ordnance (UXO) to be present at the site. P.W. Grosser Consulting•630 Johnson Avenue,Suite 7• Bohemia, NY 11716 3 PH 631.589.6353• FX 631.589.8705•www.pwgrosser.com New York, NY•Syracuse, NY•Seattle,WA•Shelton,CT 2.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES Based on the historical usage of the property as an Army base, PWGC recommended an Environmental Investigation be performed to address the potential for past site uses to have impacted soil quality at levels in excess of its intended future use (commercial) and to evaluate the likelihood of the presence of UXO in areas to be disturbed during site redevelopment. The Scope of Work included the following tasks: 1. Geophysical Investigation 2. Soil Characterization Field tasks were performed on December 13 and 14, 2016. 2.1 Geophysical Investigation A geophysical survey was performed in effort to confirm the presence or absence of metallic anomalies which may be indicative of UXO. PWGC subcontracted NAEVA Geophysics Inc. (NAEVA) of Congers, NY to perform the geophysical investigation. The geophysical survey focused on areas which will be disturbed during site redevelopment. A site plan depicting geophysical survey areas is included on Figure 3. Figure 3—Soil Sampling and Geophysical Survey Locations PWGC GRID 1 y f GRD 3 a r _�' GRD 2 ;. 1 \; SO Sampliw Plan FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT o w m • Sampling Loratim n C-ophys"Surrey Area �. Y The geophysical survey was performed utilizing a Geonics EM61 MK2 sensor. The Geonics EM61 MK2 is a high- resolution time domain electromagnetic induction sensor that is capable of detecting both ferrous and non- ferrous metallic objects. A vertical separation of 40 cm from the ground surface to the bottom coil was P.W. Grosser Consulting . 630 Johnson Avenue,Suite 7• Bohemia,NY 11716 4 PH 631.589.6353 • FX 631.589.8705•www.pwgrosser.com New York, NY• Syracuse, NY•Seattle, WA•Shelton, CT maintained during data collection. Data was stored initially in a hand-held computer and then transferred to a laptop PC for initial evaluation and editing. At a minimum,geophysical data collected using the EM61 MK2 was recorded at a rate of 5 Hz. A Trimble 5700 Real Time Kinematic Global Positioning System (GPS) was used to provide accurate, real-time data positioning. The 5700 consisted of a GPS base station set over a surveyed monument that broadcasts real-time corrections to a mobile rover unit via radio a TRIMMARK 3 modem,a rover antenna, and a repeater radio. The rover antenna was mounted directly over the center of the sensor on a manufacturer-supplied tripod. GPS location data was collected in Geodetic Coordinates and then converted to WG84 UTM Zone 4. Satellite planning software was used to predict GPS performance and thereby minimize field work during times of inadequate satellite availability. Each GPS unit was checked every morning at one or more known points(reoccupation test)with day-to-day location offsets not to exceed,3 inches from the known locations. The UX-detect module within Oasis Montaj was used to identify responses of the frequency associated with,but not limited to, potential UXO. Each valid anomaly above the target"threshold of 8mV was identified with a unique ID number,in addition 4 areas of saturated response were identified. The Geophysical Report is included in Appendix A. 2.2 ' Soil Characterization Soil samples were collected from areas which will be disturbed during the site redevelopment. Sampling locations are included on Figure 3. PWGC collected soil samples from locations to be disturbed for the site redevelopment to determine if soils have been impacted by past site operations. Based on the site grading and drainage design plans,a total of 8 samples were collected,two samples each were collected at the proposed Maintenance Bay and recharge basin,and one sample each at the Swap Shop Building and E-waste Building. Two samples were collected in areas proposed for additional site grading. Samples were collected at various depths based upon the extent of excavation to be performed within each area. The table below summarizes the sample locations and sample depths. Samples were collected with a stainless steel hand auger at depths ranging from 0-6 feet below ground surface. Metals samples were collected as grab samples. Samples for explosive residues were 5-paint composite samples. P.W.Grosser Consulting•630 Johnson Avenue,Suite 7•Bohemia,NY 11716 5 PH 631.589.6353• FX 631.589.8705•www.pwgrosser.com New York,NY•Syracuse,NY•Seattle,WA•Shelton,CT Table 1—Soil Sampling Summary Sample Location Sample ID Sample Depth(feet) Analytical Parameters Sample Coordinates Water Storage Basin S-1 0.0-0.5 Explosive Residues(EPA 8330),Metals 1525122.257 402338.2962 Water Storage Basin S-2 4.0-6.0 Explosive Residues(EPA 8330),Metals 1525109.67 402310.5184 Proposed Graded Area S-3 0.0-0.5 Explosive Residues(EPA 8330),Metals 1525083.194 402238.4698 Swap Shop Building S-4 0.0-0.5 Explosive Residues(EPA 8330),Metals 1524929.548 402170.7614 Mixing Budding S-5 2.0-4.0 Explosive Residues(EPA 8330),Metals 1524731.198 402272.758 Proposed Graded Area S-6 0.0-0.5 Explosive Residues(EPA 8330),Metals 1524673.038 402329.1816 Maintenance Building S-7 00-0.5 Explosive Residues(EPA 8330),Metals 1524940.833 402384.7371 Maintenance Budding S-8 2.0-4.0 Explosive Residues(EPA 8330),Metals 1524970.347 402370.4142 The composite samples were obtained from a 10-foot by 10-foot area around each sampling location (from the appropriate depth interval). An equal aliquot from each composite sample location was placed in a stainless steel bowl mixed and the sample transferred into laboratory supplied glassware. Samples were analyzed for metals and munitions constituents. • Metals—TAL Metals by EPA Method 6010 • Mercury—EPA Method 7471B • Zirconium—EPA Method 6020A • Explosive Residues—EPA Method 8330 Non-disposable sampling equipment was decontaminated prior to and in-between sampling with a laboratory grade detergent,tap water rinse,and distilled water rinse prior to each sampling location. Samples were transferred to laboratory supplied glassware and packed in a cooler with ice and shipped under proper chain-of-custody procedures to Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. of Westboro, MA, a New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP) (ELAP# 11148) certified laboratory for analysis following NYSDEC Analytical Services Protocol(ASP)-Category B Deliverables. P.W.Grosser Consulting•630 Johnson Avenue,Suite 7• Bohemia,NY 11716 6 PH 631.589.6353• FX 631.589.8705•www.pwgrosser.com New York,NY•Syracuse, NY•Seattle,WA•Shelton,CT 3.0 FINDINGS The findings of the soil sampling and geophysical survey are presented below. 3.1 Soil Characterization Soil sample data is compared to the NYSDEC Unrestricted Use SCOs and NYSDEC Commercial Use SCOs specified in NYSDEC 6 NYCRR Part 375 Environmental Remediation Programs, as well as EPA PRGs. Analytical data are summarized in Table 2 and 3; a copy of the laboratory analytical report is included as Appendix B. Soils collected throughout the site consisted of light brown to brown coarse sands with gravel and some cobbles. UXO or metallic debris was not encountered in the material observed during the soil sampling. Compounds indicative of explosives were not detected at concentrations exceeding their respective method detection limits(MDL)in soils samples collected from the site and analyzed for explosives residue by EPA Method 83306. Metals were detected at concentrations below NYSDEC Unrestricted Use SCOs and EPA PRGs in all eight samples with the exception of arsenic, lead,and mercury.Arsenic was detected at concentrations slightly exceeding EPA PRGs in S-1,S-2,and S-3,all of which were shallow sampling intervals(0—0.5'). However,these concentrations of arsenic were well below NYSDEC Commercial and Unrestricted Use SCOs.Lead was detected at concentrations exceeding NYSDEC Unrestricted Use SCOs in samples S-3 and S-7, both of which were shallow sampling intervals (0—0.5'). The concentrations of lead were well below EPA PRGs and NYSDEC Commercial SCOs. Mercury was detected at a concentration slightly exceeding the NYSDEC Unrestricted Use SCOs in sample S-3, which was a shallow sampling interval (0 — 0.5'). The concentration of mercury was well below EPA PRGs and NYSDEC Commercial Use SCOs. 3.2 Geophysical Investigation A total of 376 targets and 5 saturated response areas were Identified in the three areas (grids) that were investigated. Grid 1, located on the southern portion of the property contained the most anomalies and one saturated response area (associated with a building), Grid 2 included 4 saturated response areas, and Grid 3 contained the fewest anomalies and several areas where the survey was not performed (wooded area). The investigation focused on detecting anomalies that were generally larger in size(e.g.37 mm projectile and larger). Overall, each of the three grids had a high concentration of anomalies detected. The locations of the individual anomalies and the 4 areas of saturated response are provided on Figure 4 and detailed in Appendix A. P.W.Grosser Consulting•630 Johnson Avenue,Suite 7• Bohemia,NY 11716 7 PH 631.589.6353• FX 631.589.8705•www.pwgrosser.com New York,NY•Syracuse,NY•Seattle,WA•Shelton,CT Figure 4—Geophysical Survey Results :f :..: Y: ; ..:. PW f – ±a' , _ ^s:«. I .....:mrd•: — '1;'`` /I 1 GRID "fir-•. I I I ".�.ti•�'• _,e.e� s�"_�1';•+;•-�- _-.;+tet -_'.-._:_'-~c.�', :;"•:t'�:;:r:,;---m%,:- _ 1 � ,, , `�� ':, •: .• --.�. r-•,,.._ x.�,��amu..�v ',-e;',.. ., , ; •,: . GRID 3 -- -.'�.;,,;.� � , vi–•< ; ' _� Q,�:.��u,:�.>« 5-7tier — ME Muir .__ eevo• orae .w.0 caw•.a . ' GRID 2 I l ouweo•.o•w oK '�,� ; - 4 +' - •'� I ... #l oa.: lasamr .S910MI APW+ A Y �.. _ •``` '.�.>.-_ –��- �T;`- ,�� j. _ I r' � -`,: '�' Geophysical Survey _ ,�!` .. Results t r k• �'. • , :: I t 7 - ;,;,.._!r."": .�.,�.•..�....... FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT • Sampling Location • Geophysical Survey Area 4 Feet O W 1W 15D 200 P.W. Grosser Consulting•630 Johnson Avenue,Suite 7•Bohemia, NY 11716 8 PH 631.589.6353•FX 631.589.8705•www.pwgrosser.com New York,NY•Syracuse,NY•Seattle,WA•Shelton,CT 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PWGCs conclusions and recommendations of the findings of our environmental investigation for the FIWMD on Fishers Island, New York are presented below. The scope of work was based upon PWGC's Pre-Construction Environmental Investigation Work Plan for the site dated December 2,2016. 4.1 Conclusions Based on the results of Environmental Investigation, PWGC offers the following conclusions. 4.1.1 Soil Sampling Conclusions No non-metal compounds indicative of munitions use were detected above MDLs in the samples collected. Several metals (arsenic, lead, and mercury)that may be associated with past munitions use were identified in soil samples collected from the site. The levels detected are below the SCOs for the site's intended use and are within the range of typical background levels. Only lead (two samples) and mercury (one sample) exceeded NYSDEC Unrestricted Use SCOs. No sampling results exceeded NYSDEC Commercial Use SCOs. Based on the results PWGC does not consider chemical contaminants in the soil to be a concern.The proposed re-development of the site can proceed with no restrictions on the on-site re-use of site soils. The results indicate that concerns of exposure to elevated levels of chemical contaminants in site soils by construction personnel or residents accessing the site for transfer station use is not present. 4.1.2 Geophysical Survey Conclusions PWGC believes that the anomalies detected during the geophysical investigation are not likely to be associated with UXO.This is based upon: • The past military use of the proposed re-development site as a battery vs. a firing range. There would have to have been an intentional or unintentional placement/loss of UXO in the vicinity of the batteries by military personnel,this seems unlikely, at least for any significant amount of UXO. • The past military use and the current use as a waste management transfer station could be the source of scattered metallic debris (unrelated to UXO) at the site and the cause for the anomalies detected during the geophysical survey. • No reported history of UXO being found at the site. • The limited geophysical survey performed by the USACOE in the 2007 SI did not identify any subsurface anomalies in the vicinity of the former batteries associated with the site. 4.2 Recommendations Based on the findings of this environmental investigation, PWGC offers the following recommendations. P.W.Grosser Consulting•630 Johnson Avenue,Suite 7• Bohemia,NY 11716 9 PH 631.589.6353• FX 631.589.8705•www.pwgrosser.com New York, NY•Syracuse, NY•Seattle,WA•Shelton,CT No recommendations are made for additional work related to site soils. PWGC has identified a range of options regarding the findings of the geophysical investigation and the potential for the presence of UXO at the site. PWGC offers three courses of action to address potential UXO. 1. No action. Proceed with site redevelopment with no further action. 2. Limited action. Conduct test pits ata number of the identified anomalies and/or saturated areas (number TBD) identified by the geophysical survey before beginning site redevelopment with a qualified UXO technician, or have a qualified UXO technician available during the initial site redevelopment activities to provide excavation oversight(duration TBD). 3. Complete anomaly clearance. Prior to site re-development all the anomalies identified during the geophysical survey would be investigated as UXO until cleared by a qualified UXO technician. The risk associated with encountering UXO during redevelopment at the site can best be categorized as: High consequence, low probability. PWGC has concluded that it is unlikely UXO is present in the areas to be redeveloped. Based on this, PWCG recommends implementing the limited action alternative in order to minimize/limit the likelihood of encountering UXO during the site redevelopment and thus further reduce the site risk associated with encountering UXO. PWGC also recommends that the regulatory stakeholders(NYSDEC and USACOE) be briefed on the proposed site redevelopment plans and the results and recommendations provided in this report. P.W.Grosser Consulting• 630 Johnson Avenue,Suite 7• Bohemia,NY 11716 10 PH 631589.6353• FX 631.589.8705•www.pwgrosser.com New York,NY•Syracuse,NY•Seattle,WA•Shelton,CT FIGURES P.W.Grosser Consulting• 630 Johnson Avenue,Suite 7 s Bohemia, NY 11716 PH 631.589.6353• FX 631.589.8705•www.pwgrosser.com New York,NY•Syracuse,NY•Seattle,WA•Shelton,CT r _ JNA{ • L iY �� ' i ✓ ., P.W.GROSSER CONSULTING,INC. a- t • i' * 41 ,.. ,ti` �. ♦ a ♦` ° t • DRAWING PREPARED FOR:r ter`, _ +� _ •- � � . ,,. 44 ! •� '�' •r l - ��.� , .r • • ^ .fie• .. DRAWING INFORMATION:• rk Designed by: AL 7,1 Site Boundary �e _ ` J tie r �� 7, r. • . � l t a 0 900 1,800 2,700 3,600 NPW C a.,.mqk br.ranm.nW wr EMkNOIa? M r- - 'I a.r�nr f �4Ill GROSSER •- r. R 630 Johnson Avenue..Suite 7 Bohemia•NY. 11716-2618 Phone:(631)589 6353•Fax:(631)589-8705 E-mad.INFOQPWGROSSER.COM a f i • F" I j ��• I ' Battery Clinton '. ON TO THIS Ammo Dump RELATED DRAWING AND RELATED DOC MD ALTERATION RENTTSIIISIAA VIOLATION 1 {• 2 ._�,• 1 •i•�•, OF SEC 7209 OF THE N.Y.S.EDUCATION LAW •,'•�• '� ' `, �'- i _—�" ��'+•� ' DRAWING PREPARED FOR: Battery Hoffman r Battery Hamilton Wilderness Point / r• :, Battery Barlow i' / Battery Hoppock Battery Butterfield Small Arms Range #2 IAOC 11 REVISION DATE NITIAL COMMENTS Parade Grounds ! � DRAWING INFORMATION: • ` � AA Battery -� '� K` ' Project: FIW1601 Designed by: AL ! ..•' \ ��\_.�' _ � � ry„ � Date: 1/24/2017 Drawn by: TS '+ •,�� Battery MarcyScale: AS SHOWN Approved by: AL 1 �' ANITB913 FORMER BATTERY Battery Dutton =• MRA/MRS Boundary- Batteries/Small Arms Range t •� - - ,f —_—j FUDS Boundary LOCATIONS Battery 215 Battery Dynamite Small Arms Range#1 a e f Facility Locations FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT Feet DISTRICT 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Source: Site Inspection Report for Fort H.G. Wright, Alion Science and Technology FIGURE NO: 2 Document Path G'\Projects\E-L\FIW\1601\mapfiles\FIG2_MunitionsResponseBoundarym.d � y \ 1 63 pr a� / a/4-WA °r I;•SCH.♦0 PVC PE --7— /�N . PWGC GRID 1 ECTRSERVICE ELc7YPJ PAVEMEPIT S Cj 1 \\ \\7 `\ \ \ \\ l it __- J - -_ `- p�\F //MTARyP'KINGS 630 Johnson Avenue..Suite 7 Fq / \\ \ J! 18 Phone:(6�m58"- 43-Fax.(636)589- 8705 r \ GRID 3 rc _ \1 ILITY SIGN E-mail:INFO@PWGROSSER.COM _ S-1 '4 _1�, •� 3 CURITY SWIIyrE / - 1 \ BRICK;CQjdCRETE S j„^ / ' -$ \ ` INERT MATERMIS` ��—��\ `�� // d \ ` i c \ \ GO / //�----\ —__ ERM • I CONVMMKISTING / S-2 \ MEETI_lN1�iD SPID�C! / / \ j \\\ \ z .-YYIDECIIMNLMK % t J/� �\\\� `� --1�� \MFa2g 6$ c �R 9 J O� �\ / 1 } \DATE / PAD FOR WOOD ( - \ _ r I _ / \, I UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS \ /11 �\ 1RTY , i� \ --- - _ S..f' j DRAWING AND RELATED DOCUMENTS IS A VIOLATION '' �_•_ •--YAM ___ \1 I OF SEC 7209 OF THE N.Y.S EDUCATION LAW DRAWING PREPARED FOR. \ \\ ) \\\ GROUND BRUSH \ ) )\ AND LOGS �_ ___ --- - - PED GUARDRAIL dICISTIN 1/TICITY LIF .6 \ ( / // 1 \ (SifrDiryyU A11D RHEAD IBES SE6 /� TO REMOVE - 1 It na1Na07 co PEBESTFit GUARDRAIL - '• L.v y`~ 1 `\ \ fS�E-DETA1Ly' I \jG ,r vC, � -_- O • / i `� `\ COMPOSTING ARE \ �\ P ��` / 2G•a \ O / ! 1 1 `\ \\ \\ I \ \ ♦ \ �-- FXISTINGATTF�/DANT SyGQfi. \ \ I \ \�\♦.\ -/ ' 70 BE RELOCATED `\ REVISION DATE INITIAL COMMENTS S-5 ---- - , DRAWING INFORMATION: _ --`` r - 'OMAIXI�TOQTESHEgRe A o Project: FIW1601 Designed by: AL WING BUIL �G \ .•___= --------- _ ,. TqN GRID 2 __=-�,�' i \' j Date: 1/24/2017 Drawn by: TS \ C \ FNDM�RAIL j Scale: AS SHOWN Approved by: AL FINISNE P, Soil Sampling and I'r 26'CONCRETE PAD FOR Geophysical Survey OHiMPOSTING H \\-----\! ', 'r, PROPOSED LEASE LINA Locations ch \YaxaaSWAP SHOP suILDE+G FISHERS ISLAND d'MGHCHAIN LINK PERIMETER FENC WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT I Feet o so too iso 200 • Sampling Location FIGURE NO: Geophysical Survey Area 3 Document Path G\Protects\E-L\FIW\1601\mopfiies\FIG3_$OiiSomplingPlon.mxd ., \ � -1 1)^ \Pay F _\ �_ ' �•6�J� z,._�..,....... ..1 �� p0 yr WA 1•SMUQ"CH. PVC PEoh�, PWGC NICATION'ISERVI -) I /6 fL• 1 1 1 ( I 1 ) `�_J - r^ -� � � _i•*scN:�D `PY¢�uar--� / e�F.•.�FF.nw.n.e aowrbr» L__--\ �� `.-, Pti ELECTRICALsdRvICECTYPJ /or GRID 1P.W.GROSSER CONSULTING,INC. \ ♦ .+\ \ \ \ \ / // ' J O 630 Johmm Avenue..Suite 7 GRID 3 ,I Bohemia.NY. 11116-2618 / r \l (( \ \ ♦ \ 1\\ \ \ / /- Fq o /' Phone:(631)6893 -Fax:(631)589-8705 E-mail:INFO@PWGROSSER.COM I \\ r, \ / INtRiiks 7 \ 1 Ci / / ��---'\=-�� .�»� •£R I CONYtI1Tf7<l•TMIO S'2 / \ 1 / / r ♦ ♦ 17 e�sw�il�o ` 1\\ \\ \ wlaaawNusc / / _ \♦♦ 136 _ a9I tlid•P1/Gce 1 \ % PAD FOR WOOD UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS 1 _ DRAWING AND RELATED DOCUMENTS IS A VIOLATION \ �\ /1 \\ "IIET AL{!/ i/ �• �''' / - -------------- --.—; OF SEC 7209 OF THE N YS EDUCATION LAW DRAWING PREPARED FOR: OROUND gem AND i/ ' - _ --- - --.- c _ i PED auARD a"- 1 y 22 c REravtP �� C;t'=tiffs �• ` . -�-/i- TRIAN GUARD RAIL \ JSErDETAIu \JG Nv C i COMPOSTING :" AREA ExisTims\ \ — \ --- \ 1 \♦ i I DANT TO BE RELOCATED 5V�6l S_5 /j REVISION DATE INITIAL COMMENTS \� ' / / `♦ , ��. GRID 2 /'' i DRAWING INFORMATION: \�� // \\ \`\ - —�,—__ _ `\ —I B•)"' ,� —_— FRE � GF MXINaRANRs�bT9" Project: FIW1601 Designed by: AL �\` l♦ \\ ` \ /�� \ ___--MING 61.11L. 0 SIX rI cr �) Date: 1/25/2017 Drawn by: TS \�` -__ '.\ \\\\\ '�/ \♦\ I ( �� PAIL Scale: AS SHOWN Approved by: AL -4- 0--'71 4 Geophysical Survey rx2s•coNC11,62PADFat //� / 7MPOSTING NEAP' L _—.— �/ �/ / /// / t - -_, , Results _ PROPOSED LEASE LIN / /� / l//�, •' �_ _ 1 \�\\ ` 2W JO'SWAP SHOP BUILDING FISHERS ISLAND /r I /// /// 1 \\\\\\ \\ �..-,T♦ /'1.-./� '— �/////ice��%�' 1 16114IGN CHAIN LINK PERIMETER FENC WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 6 12 3 6 S•t 111,9 10 12 14 16 12 20 22 N 28 W e9 32 N M M ♦D 42 46 b x 52 `.< 56 50 60 66 88 70 7e �9 K 1 M e6 se 90 tro '° • Sampling Location FIGURE NO: Geophysical Survey Area 4 Feet 0 50 100 150 200 Document Path.G\Projects\E-L\FIW\1601\mapfiles\FIG4_GeophysicalSurvey mxd TABLES 4 P.W. Grosser Consulting•630 Johnson Avenue,Suite 7•Bohemia, NY 11716 PH 631.589.6353• FX 631.589.8705•www.pwgrosser.com New York,NY•Syracuse,NY•Seattle,WA•Shelton,CT Table 2 Analytical Data Summary - Explosives Residues Fishers Island Waste Management District, New York Depth:Client Sample ID: USEPA Region USEPA Region Sample r Laboratory ID: Screening Screening Use(3) L1640950-01 L1640950-02 L1640950-03 L1640950-04 L1640950-05 L1640950-06 L1,640950-07 L1640950-08 Sampling Date: Value(1) Vanue(2) 12/13/2016 12/13/2016 12/13/2016 12/13/2016 12/13/2016 12/14/2016 12/14/2016 12/13/2016 Explosivesby 0: 2-Amino-4,6-Dinitrotoluene 1.2 12 NS 0.031 U 0.030 U 0.031 U 0.031 U 0.031 U 0.030 U 0.031 U 0.030 U 4-Amino-2,6-Dinitrotoluene 1.2 12 NS 0.045 U 0.044 U 0.045 U 0.045 U 0.045 U 0.044 U 0.045 U 0.044 U 3,5-Dinitroaniline NS NS NS 0.036 U 0.035 U 0.036 U 0.036 U 0.036 U 0.035 U 0.036 U 0.035 U 1,3-Dinitrobenzene 0.61 6.2 NS 0.033 U 0.032 U 0.033 U 0.033 U 0.033 U 0.032 U 0.033 U 0.032 U 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.72 2.5 NS 0.033 U 0.032 U 0.033 U 0.033 U 0.033 U 0.032 U 0.033 U 0.032 U 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 0.72 2.5 NS 0.045 U 0.044 U 0.045 U 0.045 U 0.045 U 0.044 U 0.045 U 0.044 U HMX 310 3,100 NS 0.031 U 0.030 U 0.031 U 0.031 U 0.031 U 0.030 U 0.031 U 0.030 U Nitrobenzene 2 10 NS 0.077 U 0.076 U 0.077 U 0.077 U 0.077 U 0.076 U 0.077 U 0.076 U Nitroglycerin 35 120 NS 0.42 U 0.41 U 0.42 U 0.42 U 0.42 U 0.41 U 0.42 U 0.41 U 4-Nitrotoluene 12 30 NS 0.065 U 0.065 U 0.065 U 0.065 U 0.065 U 0.065 U 0.065 U 0.065 U 2-Nitrotoluene 0.88 2.2 NS 0.025 U 0.025 U 0.025 U 0.025 U 0.025 U 0.025 U 0.025 U 0.025 U 3-Nitrotoluene 73 100 NS 0.036 U 0.035 U 0.036 U 0.036 U 0.036 U 0.035 U 0.036 U 0.035 U PETN NS NS NS 0.36 U 0.35 U 0.36 U 0.36 U 0.36 U 0.35 U 0.36 U 0.35 U RDX 4.4 16 NS 0.011 U 0.011 U 0.011 U 0.011 U 0.011 U 0.011 U 0.011 U 0.011 U Tetryl 61 620 NS 0.048 U 0.047 U 0.048 U 0.048 U 0.048 U 0.047 U 0.048 U 0.047 U 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 180 1,800 NS 0.024 U 0.024 U 0.024 U 0.024 U 0.024 U 0.024 U 0.024 U 0.024 U 2 4 6-Trinirotoluene NS I NS I NS 1 0.027 U 1 0.026 U 1 0.027 U 1 0.027 U 0.027 U 0.026 U 0.027 U 0.026 U Notes: All units are mg/kg(ppm). NS-No standard established. NA-Not analyzed. 1:Result is greater than or equal to the laboratory method detection limit(MDL)and the concentration is an estimated value. U:Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected. (1)-USEPA Region IX Preliminary Remediation Goals(PRGs)Table,USEPA,December 20004,For non-carcinogens,value shown is equal to 1/10 the residential soil PRG value. (2)-USEPA Region IX Preliminary Remediation Goals(PRGs)Table,USEPA,December 20004,For non-carcinogens,value shown is equal to 1/10 the industurial soil PRG value. (3)-NYSDEC Commerical Standards((6 NYCRR Part 375 Environmental Remediation Programs Document) Table 3 Analytical Data Summary - Metlas Fishers Island Waste Management District, Fishers Island, New York Laboratory ID: Inclusturial Commercial Unrestricted L1640950-01 L1640950-02 L1640950-03 L1640950-04 L1640950-05 L1640950-06 L1640950-07 L1640950-08 Standards Sampling D. i -Westborough16 Total Metals Aluminum,Total 100,000 NS NS 8,200 5,400 4,200 6,500 4,600 4,200 3,700 4,500 Antimony,Total 410 NS NS 0.54 J 4.4 U 0.52 J 4.5 U 4.3 U 5.5 U 4.5 U 4.3 U Arsenic,Total _ 1.6 16 13 1.2 1.4 1.1 1.2 0.59 J Barium,Total 67,000 400 350 25 21 43 29 23 40 26 20 Beryllium,Total 1,900 590 7.2 0.31 1 0.18 J 0.15 1 0.24 J 0.14 J 0.15 J 0.14 J 0.15 J Cadmium,Total 450 9.3 2.5 0.98 U 0.87 U 0.16 J 0.9 U 0.86 U 0.14 1 0.9 U 0.86 U Calcium,Total NS NS NS 630 490 940 1,300 860 3,100 750 500 Chromium,Total 450 NS NS 6.9 6.2 6.3 6.6 7.7 5.8 4.7 5.5 Cobalt,Total 1900 NS NS 2.8 3 2.7 2.6 2.8 2 1 2.3 2.9 Copper,Total 41000 270 50 7.7 6.5 29 31 10 18 51 5.6 Iron,Total 100,000 NS NS 8,900 7,800 11,000 7,800 6,900 5,500 5,300 6,900 Lead,Total 800 1,000 63 16 8.2 120 26 9.6 57 Magnesium,Total NS NS NS 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,400 1,300 1,100 1,100 1,200 Manganese,Total 19,000 10,000 1600 140 100 130 130 95 95 91 100 Mercury,Total 310 2.8 0.18 0.21 0.12 0.08 0.12 0.02 J 0.08 J 0.12 0.07 U Nickel,Total 20,000 310 30 4.6 4.3 4.2 4.5 5 3.7 4.1 4 Potassium,Total NS NS NS 580 540 710 700 880 580 580 720 Selenium,Total 5,100 1,500 3.9 2 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.8 U 1.7 U 2.2 U 1.8 U 1.7 U Silver,Total 5,100 1,500 2 0.98 U 0.87 U 0.86 U 0.9 U 0.86 U 1.1 U 0.9 U 0.86 U Sodium,Total NS NS NS 49 J 34 J 54 J 48 J 37 1 53 1 46 J 35 J Thallium,Total 67 NS NS 2 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.8 U 1.7 U 2.2 U 1.8 U 1.7 U Vanadium,Total 1,000 NS NS 14 12 12 13 1 11 1 9.9 9.5 it Zinc,Total 100,000 10,000 109 26 19 91 31 1 25 57 39 13 Zirconium Totla NS NS NS 1.7 J 0.7 J 0.61 J 1.4 1 1 0.32 J 1.7 J 0.35 J 0.3S J Notes: All units are mg/kg(ppm). NS-No standard established. J:Result is greater than or equal to the laboratory method detection limit(MDL)and the concentration is an estimated value. U:Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected. Bolded/Highlighted denotes exceedance of NYSDEC-Unrestricted Use(6 NYCRR Part 375 Environmental Remediation Programs Document) Bolded/Highlighted denotes exceedance of NYSDEC-Commercial Use(6 NYCRR Part 375 Environmental Remediation Programs Document)_ Bolded/Highlighted denotes exceedance of EPA-Industurial Standards APPENDIX A GEOPHYSICAL REPORT P.W. Grosser Consulting• 630 Johnson Avenue,Suite 7• Bohemia,NY 11716 PH 631.589.6353• FX 631.589.8705•www.pwgrosser.com New York, NY•Syracuse, NY•Seattle,WA•Shelton,CT N.A,:.'VAGEOPHYSICS INC. T H F F F A D F R I N S U B S U R F A C E D F T F ( T 1 0 N Subsurface Geophysical Surveys GPR MAGNETICS ELECTROMAGNETICS Geophysical Investigation Report SEISMICS RESISTIVITY UTILITY LOCATION Fishers Island, New York UXO DETECTION BOREHOLE CAMERA STAFF SUPPORT i Dates of Investigation: December 13 and 14, 2016 NEW YORK 225 N Route 303 Prepared for: Suite 102 PW Grosser Consulting Congers 630 Johnson Avenue, Suite 7 New York 10920 (845) 268-1800 Bohemia, New York (845) 268-1802 Fax VIRGINIA P.O. Box 7325 Charlottesville Virginia 22906 (434) 978-3187 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................I.............. 3 2 INSTRUMENTATION.......................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Geonics EM61-MK2........................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Data Logger...................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Trimble RTK GPS............................................................................................................ 5 3 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................. 6 3.1 EM61-MK2 Survey.......................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Data Processing................................................................................................................ 6 3.3 Analysis & Target Selection ............................................................................................ 7 4 QUALITY CONTROL........................................................................................................... 7 4.1 Static, Latency, Cable Shake and Personnel Tests........................................................... 7 4.2 Repeat Lines..................................................................................................................... 9 5 RESULTS............................................................................................................................... 9 List of Tables Table1 - Control Points.......................................................................................6 List of Figures and Plates Figure 1 -DGM survey grids, Fishers Island, New York................................................3 Figure 2 - Data Collection in Grid 3........................................................................5 Figure 3 - Example of EM61-MK2 static test data........................................................8 Figure 4 - Example of EM61-MK2 latency test data.......................................................9 Plate 1 - EM61-MK2 channel 2 contoured data for Grid 1 Plate 2 - EM61-MK2 channel 2 contoured data for Grid 2 Plate 3 - EM61-MK2 channel 2 contoured data for Grid 3 Appendix A - Quality Control Data and Images Appendix B - Processed Data and Images Appendix C - Predicted EM61-MK2 Response of Select Standard Munitions Items I INTRODUCTION NAEVA Geophysics, Inc. was contracted by PW Grosser to provide Digital Geophysical Mapping (DGM) services at a property located on Fishers Island, New York. The primary objective of the investigation was to locate potential unexploded ordnance (UXO) within three separate areas (see Figure 1). DGM was conducted on December 13-14, 2016 and consisted of approximately 0.6 acres of grids. The terrain conditions at the site consisted of mostly flat dirt and grassy areas, with some gravel and asphalt areas. Cultural obstacles included a chain-link fence, wood fences, a small building, wood signs, utility poles, and a few trees. A wooded area with thick brush precluded collection in parts of Grid 3. 'f Lv1 �+Ars»etnFrc9r�r. `I OVwi.l!!.lM1nYn 4vmF ti. Legend 3: OPUS GPS Base Station _lilt GPS Survey Point ^n. Grid 1 Grid 2 * ► Grid 3 N D 25 50 WD Peet P.W.GnnserConsulling 2-Acre UXO Site FshersIsland,New Yark Date:12J WDt0 Figure 1: DGM survey grids,Fishers Island,New York Geophysical Investigation Report Page 3 PW Grosser Fishers Island,New York 2 INSTRUMENTATION A Geonics EM61-MK2,a data logger, and a Trimble Real-Time Kinematic (RTK)Global Positioning System (GPS) were used to map the selected areas. The GPS base station was setup on point 602 (a survey nail placed by a previous contractor located in the concrete just west of Grid 1), and continuous data was collected for several hours. This data was then uploaded to the OPUS: Online Positioning User Service website to generate a control point (a service provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Geodetic Survey). 2.1 Geonics EM61-MK2 The geophysical instrument used for the investigation was a Geonics EM61-MK2 metal detector, (see Figure 2). The EM61-MK2 is a high resolution time-domain electromagnetic instrument designed to detect, with high spatial resolution, shallow ferrous and non-ferrous metallic objects. The EM61- MK2's transmitter generates a current pulse which results in a transient primary magnetic field. The primary field induces eddy currents in nearby metallic objects. These transient eddy currents in turn generate transient secondary magnetic fields that persist after the primary field has dissipated. During the time after the initial pulse,the receiver antenna measures the transient secondary magnetic field as an induced voltage at three distinct time intervals in the bottom coil and one time interval in the top coil, or four intervals in the bottom coil if no top coil measurements are recorded. Using only bottom coil data provides more time gates for analysis. No top coil was used for this survey, allowing for four bottom coil time gates to be recorded (channels 1 through 4). Secondary voltages induced in the receiver coil are measured in millivolts (mV). The arrangement of coils is such that there is a vertical separation of approximately 40 centimeters (cm) from the ground to the bottom of the bottom coil. For this project, channel 2 readings were used to create the final maps and target lists. Geophysical Investigation Report Page 4 PW Grosser Fishers Island,New York A 4 01 M Figure 2: Data Collection in Grid 3 2.2 Data Logger EM61-MK2 data were collected using Geonics Limited EM61-MK2 programs and temporarily stored in a Juniper Allegro CX data logger as a .R61 file prior to transferring to a laptop computer and being converted to a.XYZ American Standard Code for Information Interchange(ASCII)file. 2.3 Trimble RTK GPS System A Trimble 5700 Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) GPS base station and rover were used to establish grid boundaries and record the locations of cultural features such as fences and signs. The GPS base station was used in conjunction with a Zephyr antenna mounted atop a rover staff. Real-time corrections were broadcast to the roving GPS unit via a radio link using a Trimble TDL450 Ultra High Frequency (UHF) radio modem. Data quality derived from a satellite can depend on local topography, the elevation of the satellite in the sky,weather, and other factors. A GPS quality control (QC) check was performed at the beginning of each field day to ensure accuracy. All GPS points and map data are presented in New York State Plane Coordinate System,NAD83, US survey feet. Geophysical Investigation Report Page 5 PW Grosser Fishers Island,New York Point Name ID Easting Northing Base 602 1525020.09 402228.434 GPSQC 4004 1525109.9 402386.908 Table 1: Base Station and GPS QC point locations,New York State Plane,NAD83,US Survey feet 3 METHODOLOGY NAEVA used the GPS to insert grid corners for each area of investigation. Each grid was then collected using the line and fiducial method to aid in organized data collection and positioning. 3.1 EM61-MK2 Survey The EM61-MK2 bottom coil, operating in wheel-odometer mode, was hand-towed on manufacturer- supplied wheels and the orientation of data collection was such that the 1-meter axis of-the EM61- MK2 was perpendicular to the path of travel. Triggered by the wheel odometer, data was collected systematically by recording 4-channel data at 10cm intervals along each parallel linear survey line. Survey lines were spaced 2.5 feet apart, and their paths were oriented consistently for each grid, in either the north-south or east-west directions. Guidance ropes with marks every 2.5 ft were laid perpendicular to the path of travel at 25-foot intervals to create operator triggered fiducials(positional reference markers) in the data along the dataset lines. Measuring tapes were laid out parallel to the dataset lines in order to record the locations of grid boundary positions, and locations of obstructions, such as trees. Repeat dataset lines were collected for each dataset for quality control purposes. 3.2 Data Processing The geophysical data were temporarily stored in the instrument's data logger and then downloaded to a laptop computer for on-site review and editing. Raw data were converted to ASCII format using Geomar Software's DAT61MK2 program. Once in-field editing and review was completed, the data were electronically transferred to NAEVA's Virginia office for advanced processing, analysis/target selection, and final map production. Geosoft's Oasis Montaj software package was employed to process and contour the data, and to identify and characterize potential UXO targets through the following steps: • Conversion of geographic coordinates to projected state plane coordinates; • Evaluation of data coverage; • Evaluation of data density; Geophysical Investigation Report Page 6 PW Grosser Fishers Island,New York • Application of auto leveling and instrument drift corrections and refinement of auto leveling and instrument drift corrections through manual leveling; • Application of default lag correction and refinement of lag correction; • Additional digital filtering and enhancement,as necessary; • Generation of formatted ASCII file containing processed data by grid; • Identification of saturated response areas with polygons; • Selection of targets as explained in Section 3.3; • Generation of final maps for each grid containing contoured,gridded data and target locations; • Generation and formatting of target lists. 3.3 Analysis & Target Selection The UX-Detect module within Oasis Montaj identifies peak amplitude responses of the frequency associated with,but not limited to,UXO items. Anomalies may generate multiple target designations depending on individual signature characteristics. Each of the anomalies selected by Geosoft as a target was analyzed by a trained geophysicist, and evaluated as to its validity and position. Targets found to be invalid or incorrectly located were removed or adjusted. Additionally, anomalies that were not selected by the UX-Detect module yet deemed to represent a potential UXO target were manually selected. All anomalies at or above the targeting threshold of 8 mV in Channel 2 that were deemed valid were identified using a unique ID number. Large areas of significant response in which individual target selection was not possible were bounded by polygons and no individual targets were selected. Anomalies resulting from obvious surface culture were not targeted. Each target list provides a Target ID, Grid ID, Easting (x) and Northing (y) in State Plane coordinates, the recorded peak response in millivolts (mV), and a comment column for each target. The target IDs were prioritized by designating the highest amplitude response as the number one target in each grid. 4 QUALITY CONTROL To establish confidence in the data reliability, QC tests were conducted throughout the project. Tests were conducted prior to, during, and after all data collection sessions. All QC tests for the EM61- MK2 were conducted after a minimum 15 minute warm-up period for the electronics. 4.1 Static, Latency, Cable Shake and Personnel Tests A static test was performed each day prior to the start of data collection and again at the end of the day. Static tests were performed by logging background data for approximately one minute, followed Geophysical Investigation Report Page 7 PW Grosser Fishers Island,New York by measuring the response to a standard calibration item for one minute, and then again measuring the background for one minute. These tests are used to document the consistency of instrument response and to identify any abnormal instrument drift or noise. An example of static test data is located in Figure 3. Static Calibration Test A%e«RehmIsla",New Volk 1 Equipment EM-61 Mmk II Wbide r8nge Oyer-tr CCeo1 C1WLoc-tion:OC Are- ___ AcxptNk lmib Dale'1 2/1 32 01 6 L.(wahe�e ohi-t) Lo(wlme-1 ohjlr<t1 - H Ch1_lerel H ke»I - M mV mV a2 12 .2 $ 1P221232 1P222747 1022:42.n 102257.08 1031 1P22:1222 10:2227.47 10:224272 1P.2257.08 1P2 323 fjwi WP–A ---- tTa Lt(w-h all-eft - Y� µ h11we1 Amephgi p% -4 M2 1 Ao MV mV -2 a2 VA MMI-1-100011P FAA .2 _rti> —SOIL 1 P.23:W/ 10:23:52.00 1024:W.05 10:243330 10.233]44 1023:52.x0 1P.24N.05 10:243320 L2 twlmmn oepcq - m L2 hiawu[olei4-4 H h1 1- A..p�.5((V'4 h2_kvel e ' mV mV ..2 a2 2- 1p245195 10259120 10353245 10'25'3771 10'2 16N'5105 10'250720 tP233245 10'253771 1p2. 206 Dexabe-e-1Weva MNvYpInb1V-gklfa CNM1roW W Dn> %F&--W"M1GexmTOC1121318112135T1 om LM 11-11x.LO L1 L2 ape.1 Figure 3: Example of EM61-MK2 static test data A daily latency test was performed each day at the same location,just east of Grid 1 (see Figure 1). EM61-MK2 data was collected bi-directionally over an item placed on the ground. This was done to determine the amount of instrument lag during dynamic data collection. An example of latency test data is located in Figure 4. In addition to the static test each morning, a cable shake and personnel test were performed. The cable shake test was performed by monitoring the response as the operator shook each of the instrument's cables. This test is used to observe any noise that may result from faulty cables or connections. The personnel test was performed by monitoring the response as a team member walked in the vicinity of the coils. This test is used to observe any noise that may result from having personnel work in the vicinity of the coils during data collection. Geophysical Investigation Report Page 8 PW Grosser Fishers Island,New York Latency Test- 1213LT1 Fishers Island, New York �1 jt t,nwim i • Test 1J t t Iten 0 - 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 200 Corrected M2_levd_MJ J L1 4Y - 11.1 � 100 • Test Item 1 0 - 0 5 10 1s 20 25 30 35 40 r Oebibeee:1213LT1-Ob Figure 4: Example of EM61-MK2 latency test data 4.2 Repeat Lines Following the completion of each grid area, a percentage of the line footage for the surveyed area was recollected to demonstrate repeatability in the instrument response and positioning. Profiles of the repeat lines were plotted alongside the original lines,providing a direct comparison. Each profile was evaluated qualitatively for acceptable repeatability in the instrument's response and data positioning. All images and data for the QC tests and repeat lines are included in Appendix A. 5 RESULTS A total of 376 targets and 4 saturated response areas were identified in the three areas of investigation. NAEVA selected 8 mV in channel 2 of the EM61-MK2 data as the targeting threshold for this project. Appendix B contains all target lists and processed data for the three grids. With limited information on the size or type of potential UXO suspected in the areas of investigation, 8 mV was selected to detect smaller metallic objects that could potentially represent smaller ordnance items, such as a 37mm projectile. If more information becomes available on suspected ordnance onsite, the targeting threshold can be changed accordingly. For example, if the targets of interest are larger ordnance items closer to the surface, a higher Geophysical Investigation Report Page 9 PW Grosser Fishers Island,New York threshold could be used, thus lowering the total number of targets. Appendix C provides further information on predicted EM61-MK2 response of select standard munitions items as a function of depth. GRID 1 Grid 1 was approximately 16,615 square feet in size, and EM61-MK2 data was collected in the north-south directions (see Plate 1). There were some data gaps in the EM-61MK2 data due to a small building, a wood fence with a metal gate, some wood signs, two utility poles, and some trees. The actual area covered by the EM61-MK2 was approximately 15,363 square feet. A total of 252 targets were identified in the area of investigation. There was a large saturated response area located around the small building in the southwest corner of the grid. This was not selected as a target, as the response is likely due to the building,reinforced concrete sidewalk,and surface metal surrounding the building. It should be noted that this anomaly, and any anomaly attributed to above ground features, could be masking underlying anomalies. GRID 2 Grid 2 was approximately 5,179 square feet in size, and EM61-MK2 data was collected in the east-west directions (see Plate 2). There were no data gaps in the EM61-MK2 data for this grid. A total of 87 targets and 4 saturated response areas were identified in the area of investigation. The saturated response area along the eastern edge of the grid is likely due to a reinforced concrete pad. As with the building in Grid 1,this anomaly could be masking underlying anomalies. GRID 3 Grid 3 was approximately 4,870 square feet in size, and EM61-MK2 data was collected in the east- west directions (see Plate 3). There was a large data gap in the northwest portion of the grid due to a wooded area, and another data gap due to a wooden fence that ran through the grid. The actual area covered by the EM-61MK2 was approximately 2,977 square feet. A total of 37 targets were identified in the area of investigation. Geophysical Investigation Report Page 10 PW Grosser Fishers Island,New York — -- //X\�NAvL.VAaeorrrrs,cswc. SLbs�n yeop(yskalSurvays 1525020525030 1525040 1525050 1525060 1525070 1525080 1525090 1525100 1525110 1525120 1525130 1525140 1525150 1525160 15251701525180 e v hly�o>/ 0 100 ISI frr�.27 0 98 Ao 96 21 aavorras 94 / 124 134 roao°^an o A 153 92 \ '+9 \ 197 157 64 7 m 90\ i 50 Y 59 7 (1165 9Ga ^ 0 88 o w. M9 1 o 7Xj 184 21 24 86 1311 1 84 189, 17 1� � l „ i l20 y'rr B2 207 11y 3 sy4' g 4 2 ��o na,1„g°b�r 1 244_ \,lam,23 7 j 11 "neo3Pol nAol 80 a - ✓16 w..o 88 1 8 O 78 4'a'wwe 78 a v 1 76 116 1 72 w 16 114 70 Vib �21344 68 Ll "11 h 2 w°V 5 v -fr 66 1 ! I V ^ktaleale o 64 151 19 237 11 62 87 7 91 N 60 y 1 < ✓ 7 6283'.., 0 58 49 53 1 15 71 1 N 56 87 "� 22� 54 a 61 -ems 0 52 16,'j^� 248 225,E 50 I�.f 24 48 v 159 204® 233.� 1 0 46 9 8 44 © 132'1 25y 24 0 42 l.,/ 242 0 40 38 8� N 36 � g 34 32 7 N 30 28 � q 5 7 14S"' / 0 26 22 /105 110 94 oA 24 20JO �\ 1 54 c 22 2 22„, 20 ry \_ 19 '�' 18 0_\ 16 122_--�� 1 0 14 m 6 1 .125 169 \18 2 H 12 96 \\ 0 a 2150 0 1 65 89 �6 109 8 N a 103 oA 6 .201 5 \99 4 $ rot?ey I 1 3 2 98 1 tom' o 1 2 2 r,.. 1 ro 0 $ .nem 22`q�,Ji� 8 i 8 1 .� yy Channel 2 33 - / my 13 1 A �p602 9�. 73 18� N Legend Area of Investigation H a°Pron.o 52. ao V✓�" !a 250 1 N 247 " Saturated Response Area Nrw ( 1 113100 N brush w za s 41 A Culture(if noted) $ o 2 77 /L'/7 Base Station 602 0 32 ) o (1525020 09,402228.434) 1 "}} 8 , 12 ��1 3e 56 ti 2 Selected Target 5 148 28 8 p (see target list for ID and location) 26 82 1s zz a 40 0 I' oOD N . OJ 1525020525030 1525040 1525050 1525060 1525070 1525080 1525090 1525100 1525110 1525120 1525130 1525140 1525150 1525160 15251701525180 \� Plate 1 PW Grosser EM61 MK2 Bottom Coil-Person Portable Scale 1:200 eat 10 a 10 _ 20 30 Grid Area 1-Eastern Grid US wrvey row Fishers Island,New York wlaearww rarx tmvlawd(rtusl Date of Map Creation:December 19,2016 Dale of Survey:December 13,2016 /I�1 NA �GEOP9YSIC5INC. Subsurface§eoyhystcarSury ys 1524840 1524850 1524860 1524870 1524880 1524890 1524900 1524910 1524920 1524930 1524940 1524950 1524960 1524970 1524980 1524990 3 34 2 44932 !�!` 51 84g 31 rye $ --- 38c - 25 B (7�� pp//i4� __ 7 77 i 43 � 42 6 5341 8 7 35 76 2 1/I g i 3 14 40 7 9 y, 83 2(147 .5) s or _� 0 33 g1 50 --24 27 37 ♦ o e 82o 30 26 39 -. 16 - # 45 , 7 S90 13 (100 0) 7 47 5 Concrete Pad • g 0) 1524840 1524850 1524860 1524870 1524880 1524890 1524900 1524910 1524920 1524930 1524940 1524950 1524960 1524970 1524980 1524990 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 Chan 12 m �J Legend I < Area of Investigation — — LLL�� Plate 2 ❑ Saturated Response Area PW Grosser hoz brush Culture(1f noted) EM61 MK2 Bottom Coil-Person Portable e Base Station 602 Scale 1:150 Grid Area 2-Southwestern Grid ftft � (1525020.09,402228.434) 5 0 5 10 15 zo 25 30 2 Selected Target us survey foot Fishers Island,New York p (see target list for ID and location) NA083/New York Long Island(RUS) Date of Map Creation:December 19,2016 Date of Survey:December 14,2016 1524890 1524900 1524910 1524920 1524930 0 1524950 1524960 1524970 1524980 1524990 — .. yiy r I I i RI T r I i N I O I I I I I I I I I I Wooded Area I I O I � I O I I I 1 � � o I I Wooded Area � I I I I I I gI i I i r3 - Wooded Area I I I I / (8 p f0 6 I Wooded Area O 9 - Wooded Area 1 9 r� a 10 - WooA Ferjoe 13 29v pp � ,a t� 6 � 340 o i 19 7 3 -------- ------_ 0) I I , - ---- -r-------- ---- -- ------------------- q 1524890 1524900 1524910 1524920 1524930 1524940 1524950 1524960 1524970 1524980 1524990 Legend Area of Investigation Plate 3 Scale 1:120 ❑ Saturated Response Area PW Groser 5 0 5 10 15 US aurNeytool 802 brush EM61 MK2 Bottom Coil-Person Portable • Culture(,f noted) NAD83/New York Long 1,l dd(IIUS) 9 Base Station 602 Grid Area 3-Northwestern Grid s/I�1NA"'yA (1525020.09,402226.434) Fishers Island,New York r1V GEOPHYSICS INC. ��•• •• • Selected T 2 ecteTarget Date Map Creation:December 12016 srbf e§eopfiyswafs—w V (see target list for ID and location) Date of Survey:December 14,200 166 Fa tic Calibration Test eject: Fishers Island, New York QC 1 aipment: EM-61 Mark II Outside range Operator: Geo1 urld/Location: QC Area Acceptable limits Date: 12/13/2016 LO (without object) Mean:-0.021 (mV) LO (without object) Mean:0.028(mV) +4-Ch3level Acceptable range:5(mV) +4-Ch4 level Acceptable range: 5(mV) MV Failure points: 0% mV – Failure points: 0% +2 +2 Mean Mean -2 -2- -4- -4 Time-> Time-> 10:22:12.22 10:22:27.47 10:22:42.72 10:22:57.98 1023 10:2212.22 10.22:27.47 10:22:42.72 10:22:57.98 10:23 13.23 L1 (with object) Mean: 198.41 (mV) L1 (with object) Mean: 96.88(mV) +4-Ch3level Acceptable range:5(mV) +4-Ch4 level Acceptable range:5(mV) mV Failure points: 0% mV— Failure points:0% +2 +2- I can--i—, : - -2 -2- -4- -4 Time-> i I Time-> 10:23:37.44 10:23:52.69 10:24:07.95 10:24:23.20 10:23:37.44 10:23:52.69 10:24:07.95 10:24:23.20 L2 (without object) Mean:0.12(mV) L2 (without object) Mean: 0.0063(mV) +4-Ch3level Acceptable range:5(mV) +4-Ch4 level Acceptable range: 5(mV) MV Failure points: 0% mV— Failure points:0% +2 +2 Mean Mean -2 -2- -4- -4 Time-> I Time-> 1:51.95 10:25:07.20 10:25:22.45 10:25:37.71 10:25 10:24:51.95 10:25:07.20 10:25:22.45 10:25:37.71 10:25 2.96 Database: .\1213ST1.gdb Line Name: LO L1 L2 Page: 1 Static Calibration Test ►ject: Fishers Island, New York QC 2 jipment: EM-61 Mark II Outside range Operator: Geo1 and/Location: QC Area Acceptable limits Date: 12/13/2016 LO (without object) Mean:-0.79(mV) LO (without object) Mean:-0.36(mV) +4 Ch1_level Acceptable range:5(mV) +4-Ch2 level Acceptable range:5(mV) MV mV Failure points: 0% – Failure points:0% +2 +2 Mean Mean -2 -2- -4- -4 Time-> Time-> 13:27:34.71 13:27:49.94 13:28:05.16 13:28:20.39 13:27:34.71 13:27:49.94 13:28:05.16 13:28:20.39 L1 (with object) 9e_an�5V8d FmV� L1 (with object) Mean:329.85(mV) +4 Ch1_level Acceptable range: 5(mV) +4-Ch2 level Acceptable range:5(mV) mV Failure points:0% mV– Failure points: 0% +2 +2 Mean -2 -2 -4 -4 ——— ——— ——— Iime-> _ Time—> 13:29:21.24 13:29:36.47 13:29:51.70 13:30:06.93 13:29:21.24 13:29:36.47 13:29:51.70 13:30:06.93 L2 (W_ithout object) Mean:0.21 (mV) L2 (without object) Mean:-0.048(mV) +4 Ch1_level Acceptable range:5(mV) +4-Ch2 level Acceptable range: 5(mV) MV Failure points:0% mV— Failure points:0% +2 +2 can can -2 -2- -4- -4 1 a mime-> i i 2 i Time-> " "132.30 13:30:47.55 13:31:02.81 13:31:18.06 13:31113:30:32.30 13:30:47.55 13:31:02.81 13:31:18.06 13:31 3.31 Database: \\naeva-srv\virginia\virginia office\pw grosser\fishers island ny\Geosoft\QC\121316\1213ST2.gdb Line Name: LO L1 L2 Page: 1 Static Calibration Test eject: Fishers Island, New York QC 2 ,lipment: EM-61 Mark II Outside range Operator: Geo1 and/Location: QC Area Acceptable limits Date: 12/13/2016 LO (without object) Mean: -0.2(mV) LO (without object) Mean:-0.042(mV) +4-Ch3level Acceptable range: 5(mV) +4-Ch4 level Acceptable range: 5(mV) MV Failure points:0% mV— Failure points:0% +2 +2 Mean Mean -2 -2- -4- -4 Time-> Time->. 13:27:34.71 13:27:49.94 13:28:05.16 13:28:20.39 13:27:34.71 13:27:49.94 13:28:05.16 13:28:20.39 L1 (with object) Mean:201.14(mV) L1 (with object) Mean:98.42(mV) +4-Ch3level Acceptable range:5(mV) +4-Ch4 level Acceptable range: 5(mV) MV Failure points: 0% mV— Failure points: 0% +2 +2- I Mean -2 -2- -4- -4 Time-> I Time-> 13:29:21.24 13:29:36.47 13:29:51.70 13:30:06.93 13:29:21.24 13:29:36.47 13:29:51.70 13:30:06.93 L2 (without object) Mean:-0.21 (mV) L2 (without object) Mean:-0.12(mV) +4Ch3level Acceptable range:5(mV) +4-Ch4 level Acceptable range:5(mV) _ MV mV Failure points: 0% — Failure points:0% +2 +2 Mean can ANIVIA -2 -2 -4 -4 Time-> Time-> "132.30 13:30:47.55 13:31:02.81 13:31:18.06 13:31113:30:32.30 13:30:47.55 13:31:02.81 13:31:18.06 13:31 3.31 Database: .\1213ST2.gdb Line Name: LO L1 L2 Page: 1 Latency Test - 1213LT1 Background Line Fishers Island , New York 200 � Uncorrected a� i ch2_level N — LO 100 - 1-0.1 • Test Item 0 "- ' ` ------ -- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 200 Corrected o, ch2_level_Ig a� — LO a� -- 1-0.1 tl 100 • Test Item U 0 i ---- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Y Database: 1213LT1.gdb Latency Test - 1213LT1 Fishers Island, New York 200 - 75 00 Uncorrected ch2_level 100 i i L1 1-1.1 / • Test Item r � 0 -- 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 / / 200 Corrected ch2_level_Ig 75 L1 >� -- 1-1.1 C14100 • Test Item U I / 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Y Database: 1213LT1.gdb Latency Test - 1213LT2 Background Line Fishers Island , New York 200 - 1-5 Uncorrected a� —� Ch2_Ievel U 100 LO _- LO.1 • Test Item 0 - - 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 200 Corrected o, Ch2_Ievel_Ig m — LO >� -- 1-0.1 sl 100 • Test Item U 0 - ----- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Y Database: 1213LT2.gdb Latency Test - 1213LT2 Seeded Line Fishers Island , New York 1 , 1 , 200 ' 1 , I i 1 > 1 i Uncorrected Ch2 level N 1 U 100 L1 1 L1.1 1 i • Test Item 0 --- ---- - - _ -- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 200 Corrected o, Ch2_Ievel_Ig ' m — L1 � 1-1.1 04 100 • Test Item U 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Y Database: 1213LT2.gdb Fishers Island - EM61 MK2 Bottom Coil 121316_Grid 1 Repeat Line 110 70 60 - 50 - Ch2_level_lg — Original 40 Une(s):L110.2 30 — Repeat Une(s):L110.3 20 - 10 - 0 - 150 0100150 155 160 165 170 175 180 Y (ftus) Database: Grid1_Repeat.gdb Fishers Island - EM61 MK2 Bottom Coil 121316_Grid 1 Repeat Line 112 70 60 50 Ch2_level_lg 4Original 0 Line(s): L112.52 30 — Repeat Line(s):L112.53 20 10 0 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 Y (ftus) Database: Grid 1_Repeat.gdb Fishers Island - EM61 MK2 Bottom Coil 121316_Grid1 Repeat Line 177.5 70 - 60 - 50 - 0605o Ch2_level_lg 40 — Original Une(s): L177.50 L177.51 30 — Repeat Une(s):L177.52 L177.52 20 10 0 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 Y (ftus) Database: Grid 1_Repeat.gdb Fishers Island - EM61 MK2 Bottom Coil 121316_Grid 1 Repeat Line 180 70 - 60 - 50 0605o Ch2_level_lg 40 — Original Line(s):L180 L180.1 30 — Repeat Line(s):L180.2 L180.2 20 - 10 0 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 Y (ftus) Database: Grid 1_Repeat.gdb Static Calibration Test ject: Fishers Island, New York QC 1 jipment: EM-61 Mark II 4 Outside range Operator: Geo1 u,id/Location: QC Area Acceptable limits Date: 12/14/2016 L0 (without object) Mean:-0.22(mV) LO (without object) Mean:-0.044(mV) +4 Ch1_level Acceptable range:5(mV) +4-Ch2 level Acceptable range:5(mV) MV Failure points:0% mV- Failure points:0% +2 +2 Mean Mean -2 -2- -4- L_ 2 -4 -4 - Time-> 09:01:27.67 09:01:42.90 09:01:58.13 09:02:13.35 09:02 09:01:27.67 09:01:42.90 09:01:58.13 09:02:13.35 09:02 8.58 L7 (with object) ( j ) Mean:327.88 mV Mean:457.02 mV L1 with ob ect ( ) +4 Ch1_level Acceptable range:5(mV) +4-Ch2 level Acceptable range:5(mV) MV Failure points:0% mV- Failure points:0% +2 +2 i can -2 -2 -4 -4 -- I Time-> 09:04:42.54 09:04:57.79 09:05:13.04 09:05:28.30 09:04:42.54 09:04:57.79 09:05:13.04 09:05:28.30 L2(without object) Mean:-1.95(mv) L2 (without object) Mean:-0.63(mV) +4 Ch1_level Acceptable range:5(mV) +4-Ch2 level Acceptable range:5(mV) mV Failure points:0% mV- Failure points:0% +2 +2- M e a n 2Mean can -2 -2- -4- -4 Time-> I Time-> "102.06 09:06:17.29 09:06:32.51 09:06:47.74 09:07109:06:02.06 09:06:17.29 09:06:32.51 09:06:47.74 09:072.97 Database: \\naeva-sry\virginia\virginia office\pw grosser\fishers island ny\Geosoft\QC\121416\1214ST1.gdb Line Name: LO L1 L2 Page: 1 Static Calibration Test ject: Fishers Island, New York QC 1 ipment: EM-61 Mark II Outside range Operator: Geo1 rid/Location: QC Area Acceptable limits Date: 12/14/2016 LO (without object) Mean:-0.059(mV) LO (without object) Mean:-0.0063(mV) cce tale range:5 mV Acceptable e:5mV cce ae ran +4 Ch3_level Ab p 9 ) +4 Cho level p g mV Failure points: 0% mV- Failure points:0% +2 +2 Mean can -2 -2 -4 -4 Time- Time-> 09:01:27.67 09:01:42.90 09:01:58.13 09:02:13.35 09:02 09:01:27.67 09:01:42.90 09:01:58.13 09:02:13.35 09:02 8.58 L1 (with object) Mean: 199.61 (mV) L1 (with object) Mean:97.49(mV) +4-Ch3level Acceptable range: 5(mV) +4-Ch4 level Acceptable range: 5(mV) mV Failure points:0% mV- Failure points:0% +2 +2 Mean -2 -2- -4- -4 Time-> I I Time-> 09:04:42.54 09:04:57.79 09:05:13.04 09:05:28.30 09:04:42.54 09:04:57.79 09:05:13.04 09:05:28.30 L2 (without object) Mean:-0.44(mV) L2 (without object) Mean:-0.2(mV) +4-Ch3level Acceptable range: 5(mV) +4-Ch4 level Acceptable range: 5(mV) mV Failure points:0% mV- Failure points:0% +2 +2 Mean~vW4 Mean -2 -2- -4- -4 Time-> Time-> 6:02.06 09:06:17.29 09:06:32.51 09:06:47.74 09:07109:06:02.06 09:06:17.29 09:06:32.51 09:06:47.74 09:07 2.97 Database: .\1214ST1.gdb Line Name: LO L1 L2 Page: 1 Static Calibration Test yect: Fishers Island, New York QC 2 aipment: EM-61 Mark II Outside range Operator: Geo1 uiid/Location: QC Area Acceptable limits Date: 12/14/2016 LO (without object) Mean:0.23(mV) LO (without object) Mean:0.14 (mV) Acceptable range: 5(mV) + Acceptable range:5(mV) +4 Ch1_level 4 Ch2 level mV Failure points:0% mV Failure- points:0% +2 +2 Mean Mean -2 -2- -4 -4 Time->. Time-> 11:21:50.65 11:22:05.90 11:22:21.16 11:22:36.41 11:21:50.65 11:22:05.90 11:22:21.16 11:22:36.41 L1 (with object) Mean:458.48-(mV) Z�wjth 615j ct) Mean:328.16 UmV +4mV Ch1_level Acceptable range:5(mV) +4 Ch2_level Acceptable range:5(mV) MV Failure points: 0% Failure points:0% +2 +2 , V4 & AIVV "VrvyAhAAAIAMean - - h AA L IJ -2 -2 -4 -4- 1 1 Time-> Time->- 11:23:07.22 11:23:22.49 11:23:37.77 11:23:53.05 11:24 11:23:07.22 11:23:22.49 11:23:37.77 11:23:53.05 11:24 08.33 C2-(w-ithout object) Mean: 1.11 (mV) L2 (without object) Mean:0.48(mV) +4 Ch1_level Acceptable range:5(mV) +4-Ch2 level Acceptable range:5(mV) MV Failure points:0% mV- Failure points: 0% +2 +2 Mean Mean -2 -2- -4 -4 _Sime->_ Time-> 1:20.38 11:24:35.60 11:24:50.83 11:25:06.06 1 11:24:20.38 11:24:35.60 11:24:50.83 11:25:06.06 Database: \\naeva-sry\virginia\virginia office\pw grosser\fishers island ny\Geosoft\QC\121416\1214ST2.gdb Line Name: LO L1 L2 Page: 1 Static Calibration Test eject: Fishers Island, New York QC 2 .iipment: EM-61 Mark II Outside range Operator: Geo1 and/Location: QC Area Acceptable limits Date: 12/14/2016 LO (without object) Mean: 0.08(mV) LO (without object) Mean:0.077(mV) +4-Ch3level Acceptable range: 5(mV) +4-Ch4 level Acceptable range: 5(mV) MV Failure points:0% mV— Failure points:0% +2 +2- M e a n 2Mean a Mean -2 -2- -4- -4 Time-> I Time-> 11:21:50.65 11:22:05.90 11:22:21.16 11:22:36.41 11:21:50.65 11:22:05.90 11:22:21.16 11:22:36.41 L1 (with object) Mean: 199.86(mV) L1 (with object) Mean: 97.64(mV) +4-Ch3level Acceptable range: 5(mV) +4-Ch4 level Acceptable range:5(mV) MV Failure points:0% mV— Failure points: 0% +2 +2 ov P1 Am Mean V IV -2 -2 -4 -4 mme_-> Time-> 11:23:07.22 11:23:22.49 11:23:37.77 11:23:53.05 11:2411:23:07.22 11:23:22.49 11:23:37.77 11:23:53.05 11:24 8.33 L2 (without object) Mean:0.22(mV) L2 (without object) Mean:0.068(mV) +4-Ch3level Acceptable range: 5(mV) 1 +4-Ch4 level Acceptable range: 5(mV) mV Failure points:0% mV- Failure points:0% +2 +2 Mean can -2 -2- -4- -4 Time-> Time-> " -1:20.38-1:20.38 11:24:35.60 11:24:50.83 11:25:06.06 11:24:20.38 11:24:35.60 11:24:50.83 11:25:06.06 Dat abase: .\1214ST2.gdb Line Name: LO L1 L2 Page: 1 Latency Test - 1214LT1 Background Line Fishers Island , New York 200 Uncorrected a� —i Ch2_level s LO U 100 • Test Item p --- ---- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 200 Corrected o, Ch2_level_Ig a� — LO > -- LOA 04 • Test Item U 100 0 - 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Y Database: 1214LT1.gdb Latency Test - 1214LT1 Seeded Line Fishers Island , New York 200 i Uncorrected Ch2 level r — L1 U 100 1-1.1 i • Test Item 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 i 200 Corrected Ch2_level_Ig L1 i -- 1-1.1 N� i • Test Item U 100 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Y Database: 1214LT1.gdb Latency Test - 1214LT1 Background Line Fishers Island , New York 200 Uncorrected a� —i Ch2_level s — LO U 100 _ -� L0.1 • Test Item NN p -- --- _ -- --- - 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 200 Corrected Ch2_level_Ig a� — LO > -- 1-0.1 cv� • Test Item U 100 -- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Y Database: 1214LT2.gdb Latency Test - 1214LT1 Seeded Line Fishers Island , New York 200 i i Uncorrected N� Ch2_level s --� Ll U 100 L1.1 i • Test Item 0 - -' ------ --- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 i 200 Corrected Ch2_level_lg — L1 > -- 1-1.1 C14 • Test Item j 100 `. ------ 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Y Database: 1214LT2.gdb Fishers Island - EM61 MK2 Bottom Coil 121416_Grid2 Repeat Line 2.5 600 500 Ch2_1eve1_Ig 400 Original Line(s): L2.50 300 Repeat Line(s):L2.51 200 100 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 X (ftus) Database: 121416_Grid2_Repeat.gdb Fishers Island - EM61 MK2 Bottom Coil 121416_Grid2 Repeat Line 5 600 500 Ch2_level_lg 400 — Original Une(s): L5 300 - — Repeat Une(s): L5.1 200 - 100 - 0 001000 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 X(ftus) Database: 121416_Grid2_Repeat.gdb Fishers Island - EM61 MK2 Bottom Coil 121416_Grid3 Repeat Line 0 100 - 90 80 Ch2_level_lg 70 60 — Original Line(s): LO 50 40 — Repeat Line(s): LO.1 30 20 10 - 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 X(ftus) Database: 121416_G rid 3_Re peat.gd b Fishers Island - EM61 MK2 Bottom Coil 121416_Grid3 Repeat Line 2.5 100 90 80 70 Ch2_level_lg 60 — Original Line(s): L2.50 50 40 — Repeat Line(s):L2.51 30 - 20 - 10 - 0 - 0 0201000 20 40 60 80 100 X (ftus) Database: 121416_Grid3_Repeat.gdb T/INA�VAI �9Q4� Svbsu�.6royl�ysiru(Smryt 1525020525030 1525040 1525050 1525060 1525070_ 1525090 1525090 1525100 1525110 1525120 1525130 1525140 1525150 1525160 15251701525180 00" _ 100 o98 g 98 n�,7: �.., ----- 49 j aareea 124 1 ` 153 92 ry 3964 7 90 v o 66 �9 7 165 1 9 86 . 82 184 21 24 4�1 a .. J89CX 84 2070� 11 3 90 ryyZ v % 244 ]4.23 11 -'ar7 80 78 1 30' fl6 1 ,8 e 11-10 18 47',.' 21 0 76 r 74 47 1 `-,hmv/-�Ile 4 �++ 72 0 y 8 a 1 70 2 - 7 4 4 VVV 44 � 68 v' _1 'boy v -1 66 - - _ -; 64 0 15 1 237 179 S 62 60 89 0 58 �j54 15 71 49 56,I 19Y/ L �( 52 8- 2 25 C 52 2 16P } 248 225_s 50 V240 N 48 $ 1 204 233 �� 010 ,30 46 (+,� 241g:0192J� } 44 10 ,30 2M1 �� - +o J 42 o as 1 1 A t Y 242 0 40 Y a ZW 38 e ro 8 N 36 $ 34 18 �' 32 30 4t 28 14f* 26 0 9iara.. _ 110 94 $ 2 u 22 _ 105 24 50 22 2 2 ,ao?q o 20 9 8 r ° 2....-6 Q42 t 14 1 125 169 .18 2 )) 96 0 10 2150 8910936 8 awl 103 v 6 $ u =•y 39 99 2 98 7t 0 2 2 1 0 0 2 4� a 76 e 7 Channel2 i 33 my r � 1 602o Legend n . s 3 1a o �y H 52. 9Area of Investigation o a�oa o 250 1 o 247 2110 Saturated Response Area '0p iso, - '��►rJ1 20. Y `1 47 11 a 00 S ""0 Culture(if noted) % _ - Base Station 602 2 0 S (1525020 09,402228.434) tz 3ess 2 Selected Target 26 82 146 za 8 p (see target list for ID and location) � $ 22 �1pp $ C O � O 1525020525030 1525040 1525050 1525060 1525070 1525080 1525/0900 1525100 1525110 1525120 1525130 1525140 1525150 1525160 15251701525180 o - _ Plate 1 PW Grosser EM61 MK2 Bottom Coil-Person Portable Scale 1.200 602 10 0 10 20 30 S Grid Area 1-Eastern Grid US s0rveyroa Fishers Island,New York NaoH3-N».nt«aamus Date of Map Creation.December 19,2016 _ _ Date of Survey December 13,2016 State Plane Coordinates based on Base Station 602:(1525020.06,402228.434) Project_ID Target ID Polygon Target KnownSource Location X_Local Y_Local X_SP Y_SP Chl_Final Ch2_Final Ch3_Final CM-Final Comments C1612131X 1 0 0 Gridl 147.5 69.5 1525095 402259.9 2427.843994 1710.557861 978.1983032 501.0600891 C1612131X 2 0 0 Gridl 178.7092 202.8206 1525172 402373.5 2306.414218 1654.917921 935.050712 507.6539913 C1612131X 3 0 1 Gridl 148.8632 190.8369 1525139 402373 1930.368288 1328.419434 938.7167229 471.1073754 Possibly associated with sign C1612131X 4 0 0 Gridl 175 201.05 1525167 402373.2 1617.604274 1138.07486 579.6039629 230.5555341 C1612131X 5 0 0 Gridl 127.5 2.25 1525053 402204 1623.690308 1060.781372 531.4822388 198.4087067 C1612131X 6 0 0 Gridl 147.25 74 1525096 402264.2 1457.337769 1039.21814 571.1266479 256.5914307 C1612131X 7 0 1 Gridl 152.5 188.81 1525142 402369.8 842.3111105 615.5681402 378.8355883 207.7382294 Possibly associated with sign C1612131X 8 0 0 Gridl 178.5496 196.8363 1525169 402368 837.2574295 560.3601397 366.0415803 176.4039777 C1612131X 9 0 1 Gridl 177.75 174 1525160 402346.9 967.555603 548.6742554 572.8723755 248.7690735 Associated with metal gate C1612131X 10 0 0 Gridl 152.5 182 1525140 402363.4 748.5969238 546.4633789 327.2355347 180.1573029 C1612131X 11 0 1 Gridl 146.1717 193.6664 1525138 402376.6 746.0638526 532.9954894 342.606606 178.852581 Possibly associated with sign C1612131X 12 0 0 Gridl 142.5 73.08 1525092 402265 654.4296816 485.9644527 275.5605185 128.8449426 C1612131X 13 0 0 Gridl 136.1297 35.64992 1525072 402232.3 661.442337 414.9406198 185.3952366 72.40456454 C1612131X 14 0 0 Gridl 140 185.25 1525129 402370.9 529.3614502 403.8748779 243.3460236 140.9517822 C1612131X 15 0 1 Gridl 162.5 172.5 1525146 402350.9 486.6495056 393.2592773 257.9005432 169.0884705 Associated with metal gate C1612131X 16 0 0 Gridl 155 184 1525143 402364.4 482.2628174 359.1109009 204.2341156 101.7037964 C1612131X 17 0 1 Gridl 151.4856 196.3578 1525144 402377.2 462.3068203 330.2895844 214.9904755 109.1554572 Possibly associated with sign C1612131X 18 0 0 Gridl 170 79.75 1525120 402261.5 406.1725464 289.1520386 161.6074524 84.14694214 Target on linear feature C1612131X 19 0 0 Gridl 167.5 1.5 1525090 402189.2 386.742981 281.4169617 150.9838409 73.55196381 C1612131X 20 0 0 Gridl 157.5 94.25 1525113 402279.5 325.9733887 247.1907806 147.4438782 81.92499542 C1612131X 21 0 1 Gridl 167.5 187.5 1525156 402363.2 527.6432495 232.4035492 44.76032639 3.563158512 Quick decay;Possibly associated with sign C1612131X 22 0 0 Gridl 172.5 2.25 1525095 402188.2 345.1013794 228.952179 121.2318039 45.73171616 C1612131X 23 0 0 Gridl 143.5492 185.73 1525132 402370.1 317.0492093 227.4659555 142.1571352 75.14169655 C1612131X 24 0 1 Gridl 147.5 198.3 1525141 402380.4 463.0350321 218.1840399 60.48434803 13.88847872 Possibly associated with sign C1612131X 25 0 0 Gridl 150 173.5 1525134 402356.3 334.0910645 215.7225647 106.7893143 42.91271973 C1612131X 26 0 0 Gridl 176.2491 9.424779 1525101 402193.5 339.4691229 213.496105 106.4746388 32.72123289 Target on linear feature C1612131X 27 0 0 Gridl 100 200.86 1525097 402399.8 280.9183653 200.5834947 118.9378805 66.45845168 C1612131X 28 0 0 Gridl 167.5 8.25 1525092 402195.5 275.6857605 182.4758301 88.16150665 34.66967773 Target on linear feature C1612131X 29 0 1 Gridl 170 175.75 1525154 402351.3 228.688736 174.8682404 108.6588364 65.86764526 Associated with metal gate C1612131X 30 0 0 Gridl 150.0364 183.8667 1525138 402366 228.8001704 174.0975032 112.8026977 66.94037315 C1612131X 31 0 0 Gridl 137.5 15.75 1525067 402213.1 308.7181702 170.6870728 49.1668396 7.859603882 Quick decay C1612131X 32 0 0 Gridl 174.75 18 1525102 402202.1 293.3734741 168.4164429 68.10814667 20.67798042 Target on linear feature C1612131X 33 0 0 Gridl 130 37.5 1525067 402236.2 230.8322601 162.6026764 91.81305695 46.64129639 C1612131X 34 0 0 Gridl 130 31.25 1525065 402230.3 292.4493713 158.4821472 62.19343185 23.65184975 C1612131X 35 0 0 Gridl 152.75 1.75 1525076 402194.7 224.2676239 150.9579926 85.10453796 36.83730698 C1612131X 36 0 0 Gridl 157.5 66.25 1525103 402253.3 193.0724945 149.755249 84.07345581 38.31197357 C1612131X 37 0 0 Gridl 125 194.25 1525118 402384.7 368.9300537 148.5606995 28.93375969 3.614206076 Quick decay C1612131X 38 0 0 Gridl 172.5 15.25 1525099 402200.3 266.1138 138.7425385 52.27878189 14.21193314 Target on linear feature C1612131X 39 0 0 Gridl 100 189.22 1525093 402388.9 191.5983653 138.0834947 73.47788052 31.58845168 C1612131X 40 0 0 Gridl 177.5 2.15 1525099 402186.3 209.0116518 132.9873414 66.95335289 24.89809033 C1612131X 41 0 0 Gridl 172.5 27.5 1525104 402211.8 187.2136993 132.7250061 79.93896484 43.99470139 Target on linear feature C1612131X 42 0 0 Gridl 180 77.22 1525128 402255.6 203.4037881 129.3655378 49.31680222 11.08910681 C1612131X 43 0 1 Gridl 180 179.14 1525164 402350.9 182.1073106 124.7284108 64.9970639 32.0551428 Associated with metal gate C1612131X 44 0 1 Gridl 175 178.19 1525159 402351.8 173.5542743 122.8148596 65.67396295 33.94553412 Associated with metal gate C1612131X 45 0 0 Gridl 135 62 1525081 402257.3 158.5987396 122.4498215 73.52441406 44.39279938 C1612131X 46 0 1 Gridl 107.5 55.75 1525053 402261.2 169.382019 121.5250092 69.04159546 37.89278412 Possibly associated with building C1612131X 47 0 1 Gridl 160.25 186 1525148 402364.4 155.4998627 119.7893753 84.84217834 47.52613449 Possibly associated with sign C1612131X 48 0 0 Gridl 120 0.25 1525045 402204.8 162.7155762 114.3480759 61.20607376 26.94106865 C1612131X 49 0 0 Gridl 102.5 197.27 1525098 402395.6 163.2238528 111.3891965 62.47543138 33.04535434 C1612131X 50 0 0 Gridl 147.5 205 1525143 402386.7 166.9377136 110.5198441 62.65967941 30.26808548 C1612131X 51 0 0 Gridl 170 32.75 1525103 402217.6 190.7528839 105.6174927 50.52532959 25.11440659 Target on linear feature C1612131X 52 0 0 Gridl 170.25 37.75 1525105 402222.2 159.2299347 105.3987045 60.97080231 32.21687317 Target on linear feature C1612131X 53 0 1 Gridl 165 177.5 1525150 402354.7 151.4913788 103.4138641 51.75776672 24.77363968 Possibly associated with metal gate C1612131X 54 0 0 Gridl 163.6273 94.43382 1525119 402277.5 153.9607423 102.5330322 51.22604497 22.90395602 C1612131X 55 0 1 Gridl 162.75 176.5 1525147 402354.6 150.1557159 100.3552933 45.06243134 12.65547276 Possibly associated with metal gate C1612131X 56 0 0 Gridl 177.5 14 1525103 402197.4 149.8266449 100.1426697 55.54901123 29.87889099 Target on linear feature C1612131X 57 0 0 Gridl 170 19.34 1525098 402205 146.9068636 97.50960277 57.51091759 31.12619359 Target on linear feature C1612131X 58 0 0 Gridl 102.5 134.75 1525076 402337 143.0471802 96.93413544 46.74353409 14.68011856 C1612131X 59 0 0 Gridl 102.5 186 1525094 402385 144.2154694 96.73082733 52.18479538 23.51633835 C1612131X 60 0 0 Gridl 150 80 1525101 402268.8 129.30896 96.29253387 57.70131302 30.7986927 C1612131X 61 0 0 Gridl 100 122.88 1525069 402326.7 141.1488854 95.64764831 46.40862911 15.81673648 C1612131X 62 0 0 Gridl 147.5 152 1525124 402337.1 127.9881744 95.44966888 55.10007095 30.58891869 C1612131X 63 0 0 Gridl 102.5 130.5 1525074 402333 137.3723297 93.31761169 44.15925598 13.26868916 C1612131X 64 0 0 Gridl 115 193.25 1525108 402387.3 120.3563232 90.32205963 54.87240601 31.69713974 C1612131X 65 0 0 Gridl 145 62.75 1525090 402254.5 132.7267914 88.81220245 45.92301559 21.36066437 C1612131X 66 0 1 Gridl 180 163.8 1525159 402336.6 132.7395602 87.95911711 46.25572682 22.10229891 Associated with metal gate C1612131X 67 0 0 Gridl 157.75 83.25 1525110 402269.1 148.7039337 87.05112457 32.66489029 7.281902313 C1612131X 68 0 0 Gridl 166.2256 55.31107 1525108 402240 149.558613 86.78393037 36.80086345 13.40726982 Target on linear feature C1612131X 69 0 1 Gridl 100 51.67 1525044 402260 134.9327456 83.2701567 42.44857345 17.34908057 Possibly associated with building C1612131X 70 0 0 Gridl 135 43.5 1525074 402240 108.4726486 82.68481445 55.01824188 35.11932755 C1612131X 71 0 0 Gridl 141.2971 144.0956 1525116 402331.9 111.4928553 82.52747613 48.80420397 27.69572107 C1612131X 72 0 0 Gridl 172.5 182 1525158 402356.3 113.5699081 81.37310791 47.8072052 26.1020565 C1612131X 73 0 0 Gridl 170 46.75 1525108 402230.7 116.3156204 80.9108429 49.83342743 28.20242691 Target on linear feature C1612131X 74 0 0 Gridl 102.5 147.75 1525080 402349.2 121.2248306 80.29399109 35.17181778 10.47039604 C1612131X 75 0 0 Gridl 169.75 53.75 1525110 402237.3 115.5042496 79.17011261 49.11589813 27.6836338 Target on linear feature C1612131X 76 0 0 Gridl 122.5 164 1525105 402357.3 124.8517838 75.78149414 30.99990082 7.768157005 C1612131X 77 0 0 Gridl 160 17.25 1525088 402206.6 123.3407974 75.43225098 35.26285172 12.43061543 C1612131X 78 0 0 Gridl 102.5 152.75 1525082 402353.8 109.7295456 75.25941467 33.96041107 10.84042931 C1612131X 79 0 0 Gridl 105 181 1525094 402379.4 101.7014542 70.02272797 30.66472816 9.244645119 C1612131X 80 0 0 Gridl 160 13.25 1525087 402202.9 108.5797729 68.41946411 28.43504906 8.043310165 C1612131X 81 0 0 Gridl 162.5 180.75 1525149 402358.7 85.98375702 66.05673981 33.47606277 16.08899117 C1612131X 82 0 0 Gridl 162.5 2.15 1525085 402191.6 94.85220354 63.44866849 35.76771738 16.46904229 C1612131X 83 0 0 Gridl 150 150.25 1525126 402334.6 83.74505615 62.60597992 38.85408783 22.55586243 C1612131X 84 0 1 Gridl 105 53.56 1525050 402260 91.39227702 61.95365213 36.31466918 18.35056952 Possibly associated with building C1612131X 85 0 0 Gridl 175 123 1525140 402300.2 92.91377258 61.62792206 32.06307602 16.81784058 C1612131X 86 0 0 Gridl 100 101.27 1525062 402306.5 132.2188854 61.38764831 13.65862911 1.506736476 Quick decay C1612131X 87 0 0 Gridl 138.809 139.9773 1525112 402329 101.7797281 60.79228858 25.3336016 8.709337771 C1612131X 88 0 1 Gridl 165 190.53 1525154 402366.9 79.87914142 60.48871007 40.14959132 21.95942014 Possibly associated with sign C1612131X 89 0 0 Gridl 149.75 64 1525095 402254 91.90938568 60.11503601 33.11945724 16.25388336 C1612131X 90 0 0 Gridl 155 192.25 1525146 402372.1 80.95101929 58.99702454 34.46792984 18.50311279 C1612131X 91 0 1 Gridl 177.5 166 1525157 402339.5 94.50096784 58.54005453 36.51519599 15.94648369 Associated with metal gate C1612131X 92 0 0 Gridl 152.5 204.92 1525148 402384.8 84.90844778 57.63743511 31.65690105 16.54438081 C1612131X 93 0 0 Gridl 180 42.5 1525116 402223.1 82.60725279 57.46571071 30.3045782 14.84200551 C1612131X 94 0 0 Gridl 180 106.49 1525139 402283 90.83221101 57.32866025 28.44114437 12.22474532 C1612131X 95 0 0 Gridl 150 38.25 1525086 402229.8 106.1735916 57.05215836 16.77740479 3.418481588 C1612131X 96 0 0 Gridl 167.5 74 1525115 402257 82.64051056 56.26241302 32.88782501 17.93501663 Target on linear feature C1612131X 97 0 0 Gridl 142.5 204.15 1525138 402387.7 88.53456829 56.14617737 27.91734843 11.4870742 C1612131X 98 0 0 Gridl 169.9558 63.82448 1525114 402246.6 79.66508245 55.26726581 33.98166791 19.1994437 Target on linear feature C1612131X 99 0 0 Gridl 153.6171 59.13074 1525097 402248 75.98294217 54.50080847 34.74401474 17.15412331 C1612131X 100 0 0 Gridl 180 28.48 1525111 402210 88.84266382 53.59849046 22.40798351 7.004478813 C1612131X 101 0 0 Gridl 167.75 12.5 1525094 402199.4 79.90773773 50.34109116 26.71807861 13.24527359 Target on linear feature C1612131X 102 0 0 Gridl 145 149.25 1525121 402335.4 72.02970123 50.25900269 26.0268383 12.58372021 C1612131X 103 0 0 Gridl 162.5 65.75 1525108 402251.1 80.83370972 50.15325928 21.03281403 5.975050449 C1612131X 104 0 0 Gridl 142.5 166.5 1525125 402352.5 73.55462646 49.68110275 25.86741066 11.57704353 C1612131X 105 0 0 Gridl 172.5 101.75 1525130 402281.2 101.7096863 48.37120819 12.33709145 1.158093452 C1612131X 106 0 0 Gridl 110 104.75 1525072 402306.2 66.27009583 48.07138443 27.06066513 15.36667538 C1612131X 107 0 0 Gridl 175 107.75 1525134 402285.9 74.12680054 48.00706863 25.35656929 11.73082066 C1612131X 108 0 0 Gridl 140 198 1525133 402382.8 77.26251221 47.62501526 20.26770592 7.233128071 C1612131X 109 0 0 Gridl 169.75 71.5 1525117 402253.9 69.3981781 47.48203659 28.64888763 16.06443405 Target on linear feature C1612131X 110 0 0 Gridl 177.5 104.5 1525136 402282 68.50580597 47.23303604 25.87929726 12.19900608 C1612131X 111 0 0 Gridl 102.5 144.25 1525079 402345.9 74.1414566 47.00363541 21.58924675 6.390295506 C1612131X 112 0 0 Gridl 160 8.5 1525085 402198.4 67.04798889 46.94112015 27.10982513 13.58679295 C1612131X 113 0 0 Gridl 177.5 28 1525108 402210.5 79.43920135 46.83900833 21.40390205 7.985899448 Target on linear feature C1612131X 114 0 0 Gridl 110 160 1525092 402358 66.62355042 45.67304611 22.07108307 6.81154871 C1612131X 115 0 0 Gridl 105 98.5 1525065 402302.1 65.33576965 45.66326141 21.7154274 7.342098713 C1612131X 116 0 0 Gridl 165 183 1525152 402359.9 63.58628698 45.23395202 28.2910911 11.73059369 C1612131X 117 0 0 Gridl 157.5 191.32 1525148 402370.3 63.15587639 45.07355536 26.97058981 14.51384075 C1612131X 118 0 0 Gridl 135 186 1525124 402373.4 64.65293884 45.00972748 21.5722847 7.82778883 C1612131X 119 0 0 Gridl 167.5 89.5 1525121 402271.5 68.18256378 43.63922501 24.46181488 12.88864422 C1612131X 120 0 0 Gridl 177.5 187.25 1525165 402359.4 67.32084656 42.97374344 20.08950233 8.760293007 C1612131X 121 0 0 Gridl 162.5 102.75 1525121 402285.7 62.3837204 41.64575958 19.04627419 5.669129848 C1612131X 122 0 0 Gridl 165 110.25 1525126 402291.8 62.58669281 40.48981094 16.9846077 5.095881939 C1612131X 123 0 0 Gridl 110 170.75 1525096 402368 61.05844498 40.42518234 19.99197578 8.603539467 C1612131X 124 0 0 Gridl 110 197.81 1525105 402393.4 56.58113142 39.80617498 23.85852023 13.57762943 C1612131X 125 0 0 Gridl 157.5 73.75 1525106 402260.3 62.7491951 39.24449921 19.15451241 7.149982452 C1612131X 126 0 0 Gridl 102.5 94.5 1525062 402299.3 55.84461975 38.83264923 17 49393082 4.708216667 C1612131X 127 0 0 Gridl 107.5 135.5 1525081 402335.9 59.24819183 38.54759598 17.46158028 4.585151196 C1612131X 128 0 0 Gridl 115 136.75 1525088 402334.4 57.08545303 38.51314545 17.32527924 5.527320385 C1612131X 129 0 0 Gridl 105 102.75 1525067 402306.1 60.0835762 37.84592438 17.84462738 5.955129147 C1612131X 130 0 0 Gridl 170 204.25 1525164 402378 52.15991592 37.49431229 22.1301918 14.22702885 C1612131X 131 0 0 Gridl 155 199.5 1525148 402378.9 48.92630768 36.93888092 20.17732811 10.41777515 C1612131X 132 0 0 Gridl 115 112.25 1525080 402311.5 51.67457962 36.50674438 16.64816666 5.072074413 C1612131X 133 0 0 Gridl 125 190.25 1525117 402380.9 69.68083954 36.33355331 15.18660069 5.354847908 C1612131X 134 0 0 Gridl 117.75 200.5 1525113 402393.1 54.1350174 35.98490143 19.81853294 9.793582916 C1612131X 135 0 0 Gridl 140 3.5 1525065 402200.8 51.31279755 35.91246033 21.8722477 12.28321648 C1612131X 136 0 0 Gridl 152.5 171.75 1525136 402353.8 55.16889572 35.87586594 17.3488121 5.919537067 C1612131X 137 0 0 Gridl 162.5 160.5 1525141 402339.7 51.69320297 35.70127869 19.02872658 9.734734535 C1612131X 138 0 0 Gridl 117.5 164 1525100 402359 54.32859398 34.25259724 16.05489355 6.736533625 C1612131X 139 0 0 Gridl 136.4243 84.72889 1525090 402278.1 49.12627724 33.32425469 15.47179454 6.129261694 C1612131X 140 0 0 Gridl 167.5 136.75 1525138 402315.7 56.90341568 33.0607872 11.31959152 2.236452341 C1612131X 141 0 0 Gridl 120 159 1525101 402353.5 44.45248795 32.89538574 19.91825104 10.78624821 C1612131X 142 0 0 Gridl 155 76.5 1525105 402263.8 52.80257797 32.87098312 15.08786488 5.248310566 C1612131X 143 0 0 Gridl 160 51.5 1525100 402238.6 44.75122452 32.26448822 16.68104553 8.515507698 C1612131X 144 0 0 Gridl 139.75 150.75 1525116 402338.7 47.86169815 31.74687958 14.99825764 4.675690174 C1612131X 145 0 0 Gridl 167.5 105.25 1525126 402286.3 56.12202072 31.52681351 14.32860851 6.121767044 C1612131X 146 0 0 Gridl 160 100.65 1525118 402284.6 42.52937868 30.6868407 18.22238489 9.880689881 C1612131X 147 0 0 Gridl 105 160 1525087 402359.7 45.8965416 30.63928223 15.91901112 5.735635281 C1612131X 148 0 0 Gricil 157.6495 4.333197 1525082 402195.3 49.66175953 30.62533076 15.17748832 5.467498251 C1612131X 149 0 0 Gridl 115 167 1525099 402362.7 41.79771805 29.16840172 12.15611553 3.363761902 C1612131X 150 0 1 Gridl 128.3452 58.17763 1525073 402256.1 46.09120536 29.13051069 14.74890593 6.00224 Possibly associated with building C1612131X 151 0 0 Gridl 137.5185 152.6552 1525115 402341.3 43.47709455 28.78791916 13.28433073 3.880307202 C1612131X 152 0 1 Gridl 125.25 57 1525070 402256.1 46.07785416 28.36327171 14.09055805 5.859535217 Possibly associated with building C1612131X 153 0 0 Gridl 115 197.18 1525110 402391 38.82209043 27.8955328 17.9556183 9.657265075 C1612131X 154 0 0 Gridl 112.25 106 1525075 402306.6 40.51835632 27.82559586 13.35177994 4.137695789 C1612131X 155 0 0 Gridl 157.5 123.25 1525123 402306.6 37.53012848 27.385252 14.7493 5.445095539 C1612131X 156 0 0 Gridl 157.5 106 1525117 402290.5 41.1319313 27.26597977 12.91416073 4.767771244 C1612131X 157 0 0 Gridl 132.5 201.25 1525127 402388.6 41.55823898 26.6503849 13.62829494 5.899084568 C1612131X 158 0 0 Gridl 127.5 138.5 1525101 402331.6 44.2623558 26.53066635 11.80894089 4.885914803 C1612131X 159 0 0 Gridl 102.5 112.75 1525068 402316.4 37.43221664 26.18454742 11.90758324 3.767221212 C1612131X 160 0 0 Gridl 107.5 162.75 1525090 402361.4 40.86206055 26.08882523 11.99131298 3.071572304 C1612131X 161 0 1 Gndl 122.5 61 1525069 402260.8 41.94366837 25.96378517 12.06262207 4.371852398 Possibly associated with building C1612131X 162 0 0 Gridl 142.5 51.25 1525084 402244.6 33.33753204 25.34285736 15.91053772 9.517905235 C1612131X 163 0 0 Gridl 112.5 123.75 1525081 402323.1 38.49139404 25.34086037 10.81560802 2.434403419 C1612131X 164 0 0 Gridl 177.5 85.25 1525129 402264 37.19224167 24.83493614 12.83848572 6.423509121 C1612131X 165 0 0 Gridl 135 197.25 1525128 402383.9 35.33586502 24.69535065 13.92061234 7.155644417 C1612131X 166 0 0 Gridl 107.5 130.25 1525079 402331 37.6424408 24.46119118 10.79281139 2.983299494 C1612131X 167 0 0 Gridl 172.5 193.5 1525162 402367 35.91302109 23.77941132 11.32001305 5.637063026 C1612131X 168 0 0 Gridl 102.5 156.5 1525083 402357.4 40.90192413 23.74474335 10.5983305 2.655714273 C1612131X 169 0 0 Gridl 162.5 75.64 1525111 402260.3 41.3800865 23.70734218 12.03693978 5.742886112 C1612131X 170 0 0 Gridl 110 97.25 1525070 402299.2 34.52679825 22.90617752 10.12634087 2.967880249 C1612131X 171 0 0 Gridl 122.5 151.75 1525101 402345.8 37.74905777 22.8987236 13.31794739 5.947448254 C1612131X 172 0 0 Gridl 115 172.5 1525101 402367.9 32.46123886 22.67020416 9.528708458 3.154024124 C1612131X 173 0 0 Gridl 102.5 175.75 1525090 402375.4 57.33494949 22.65534973 4.589959145 0.615042567 Quick decay C1612131X 174 0 0 Gridl 152.5 40 1525089 402230.5 45.460392 22.49645424 6.154344082 1.238534331 Possibly related to nearby larger anomaly C1612131X 175 0 0 Gridl 115 156 1525095 402352.4 33.90795517 22.47241211 10.40602112 2.590873241 C1612131X 176 0 0 Gridl 157.5 54 1525099 402241.9 34.00378799 22.29491997 11.55657387 4.869504929 C1612131X 177 0 0 Gridl 140 49.75 1525081 402244.1 28.49428177 21.50974846 12.47503567 7.22069025 C1612131X 178 0 1 Gridl 127.25 63.25 1525074 402261.2 34.27657318 21.33145714 10.20083618 3.863533258 Possibly associated with building C1612131X 179 0 1 Gridl 172.5 166 1525153 402341.3 30.3535506 21.23502528 15.22894362 7.984650023 Associated with metal gate C1612131X 180 0 0 Gridl 107.5 90.75 1525065 402294 29.76688004 20.82028008 8.986555099 2.062977791 C1612131X 181 0 0 Gridl 180 49.67 1525118 402229.9 33.04448435 20.76754433 7.062138282 0.737484278 Quick decay C1612131X 182 0 0 Gridl 142.5 161.75 1525123 402348 35.06071472 20.65082169 9.767295837 3.810836077 C1612131X 183 0 0 Gridl 117.75 153.75 1525097 402349.3 28.17188454 20.16255569 10.74034214 5.341985226 C1612131X 184 0 0 Gridl 132.25 192 1525124 402380 32.63771057 19.98119354 10.25362873 4.823683262 C1612131X 185 0 0 Gridl 147.5 58.08 1525091 402249.2 35.55907417 19.59657352 8.477684734 3.081820058 C1612131X 186 0 0 Gridl 107.5 4.5 1525035 402213.2 32.13982773 19.41842079 8.781074524 3.881620169 C1612131X 187 0 0 Gridl 117.5 144 1525093 402340.3 30.42051125 19.31928444 9.030374527 3.138932943 C1612131X 188 0 0 Gridl 107.5 111.5 1525072 402313.4 28.13546753 19.29069138 8.28630352 1.847762465 C1612131X 189 0 0 Gridl 112.5 181.5 1525102 402377.2 27.88436699 19.12152672 7.609906197 2.019632578 C1612131X 190 0 0 Gridl 102.5 171 1525089 402370.9 38.59877014 19.09536552 6.150903225 1.288276315 C1612131X 191 0 0 Gridl 173.9002 154.9919 1525150 402330.5 35.96391871 18.88293793 5.155533862 0.219830874 Quick decay C1612131X 192 0 0 Gridl 165.25 134.75 1525135 402314.6 33.73716736 18.58006096 6.045127392 0.929197252 C1612131X 193 0 0 Gridl 120 155.5 1525100 402350.2 28.39823341 18.57203484 11.17091942 5.696233749 C1612131X 194 0 0 Gridl 180 68.51 1525125 402247.5 27.54718574 18.53146932 9.246614852 4.296473771 C1612131X 195 0 0 Gridl 137.5 131.5 1525108 402321.5 31.858675 18.49279976 6.857890606 1.784419298 C1612131X 196 0 0 Gridl 142.5 155.25 1525121 402341.9 28.03342819 18.47631836 9.443419456 3.31447053 C1612131X 197 0 0 Gridl 127.5 200.75 1525123 402389.9 26.30303383 18.15380096 9.777658463 4.979081631 C1612131X 198 0 0 Gridl 145 169.5 1525128 402354.4 17.70452881 17.94170189 9.223930359 4.031972408 C1612131X 199 0 0 Gridl 132.75 194.75 1525125 402382.4 26.13492584 17.82587624 10.02613831 4.918616772 C1612131X 200 0 0 Gridl 175 113.75 1525137 402291.5 31.38077927 17.74091721 8.629650116 3.990147114 C1612131X 201 0 1 Gridl 127.5 50.63 1525070 402249.3 32.37193552 17.69309038 6.497455959 1.45821687 Possibly associated with building C1612131X 202 0 0 Gridl 102.5 74.75 1525055 402280.8 27.36067963 17.53060532 6.087897301 0.911212623 Quick decay C1612131X 203 0 0 Gridl 130 45 1525070 402243.2 28.55592346 17.4724102 7.656175613 2.56964469 C1612131X 204 0 0 Gridl 110 116.25 1525076 402317 26.75379944 17.41808128 7.505587578 2.142418385 C1612131X 205 0 0 Gridl 115 5.75 1525042 402211.7 38.14995193 17.33554077 4.318086624 1.7886163 C1612131X 206 0 0 Gridl 132.5 156 1525112 402346.2 33.366262 17.30617971 7.319247087 1.819099739 C1612131X 207 0 0 Gridl 112.5 176.75 1525100 402372.8 24.06729889 17.27647018 6.819348812 1.559314609 C1612131X 208 0 0 Gridl 160 126.25 1525127 402308.6 30.93974495 17.12222672 6.112182617 1.306444407 C1612131X 209 0 0 Gridl 109.75 155.25 1525090 402353.6 26.10776901 16.91865349 9.100996017 3.682629347 C1612131X 210 0 0 Gridl 162.5 27.5 1525094 402215.3 24.694664 16.71105576 10.04005814 5.993876934 C1612131X 211 0 0 Gridl 120 205 1525117 402396.5 27.35150146 16.56886292 7.918404579 3.712867737 C1612131X 212 0 0 Gridl 107.456 153.5704 1525087 402352.8 25.41566766 16.23195967 8.290596004 3.612834876 C1612131X 213 0 0 Gridl 157.5 173.4 1525141 402353.6 29.02587639 16.21355536 6.170589806 2.413840747 C1612131X 214 0 0 Gridl 109.75 150.75 1525088 402349.4 23.51169205 16.17677689 7.338315487 2.015230179 C1612131X 215 0 0 Gridl 144.9168 8.739414 1525071 402204 30.8996078 16.05707809 6.906954607 2.695051181 C1612131X 216 0 0 Gridl 107.25 148.5 1525085 402348.2 23.33534622 15.86611366 6.706511974 1.559172034 C1612131X 217 0 0 Gridl 130 204 1525126 402392 25.73765373 15.59734344 6.663878918 2.991688013 C1612131X 218 0 0 Gridl 137.5 193.45 1525129 402379.5 21.77283928 15.55952928 8.084243747 3.898450532 C1612131X 219 0 0 Gridl 160 201.25 1525153 402378.7 23.53780174 15.49219322 7.474982262 3.687083006 C1612131X 220 0 0 Gridl 150 49 1525090 402239.8 25.68231201 15.3382473 7.038268566 3.429817438 C1612131X 221 0 0 Gridl 135 123 1525102 402314.4 26.9375248 15.30944061 5.289773464 1.128013611 C1612131X 222 0 0 Gridl 180 155.96 1525156 402329.2 22.85270612 15.16794255 8.292590371 3.85652758 C1612131X 223 0 0 Gridl 180 96.52 1525135 402273.7 27.07611199 15.04880379 5.286855165 0.998388863 C1612131X 224 0 0 Gridl 145 91.5 1525101 402281.4 20.24268913 14.53268337 6.819050312 2.845358372 C1612131X 225 0 0 Gridl 152.5 140.25 1525125 402324.3 21.7387085 14.51402473 6.381115913 3.557683945 C1612131X 226 0 0 Gridl 157.4896 179.2429 1525143 402359 21.75003284 14.49396503 7.744201157 4.016478249 C1612131X 227 0 1 Gridl 130 22.21 1525062 402221.8 23.39452403 14.35167896 6.485019692 1.8800165 Possibly associated with building C1612131X 228 0 0 Gridl 137.5 22 1525069 402219 22.07072449 13.79884148 6.802182674 3.323642254 C1612131X 229 0 0 Gridl 130 159.25 1525110 402350.1 21.19795799 13.17151451 6.042720318 1.44098413 C1612131X 230 0 0 Gridl 155 176.5 1525140 402357.4 21.08882904 13.15645027 3.812338591 0.987775564 C1612131X 231 0 0 Gridl 110.8938 89.32391 1525068 402291.4 19.00320573 13.14372234 7.031627051 3.176417949 C1612131X 232 0 0 Gridl 135 130.33 1525105 402321.3 23.32943103 12.55410854 5.964146041 2.503527227 C1612131X 233 0 0 Gridl 160 136.25 1525130 402317.9 19.11722946 12.54521465 5.873625278 2.849838257 C1612131X 234 0 0 Gridl 150 12 1525077 402205.2 22.85204506 12.45408249 4.986819744 2.205607414 C1612131X 235 0 0 Gridl 127.75 160.75 1525109 402352.3 19.20740318 12.29283428 4.655058861 0.709386766 Quick decay C1612131X 236 0 0 Gridl 112.25 132.25 1525084 402331.2 19.31770134 12.27960205 5.639401436 2.337502003 C1612131X 237 0 1 Gridl 167.5 165 1525148 402342.1 22.57744836 12.16924961 6.00677655 2.463638406 Associated with metal gate C1612131X 238 0 0 Gridl 177.5 59.5 1525120 402239.9 16.96254158 11.18963337 4.868218422 1.220208526 C1612131X 239 0 0 Gridl 137.5 51.28 1525079 402246.4 23.82666029 10.94111242 3.408769711 1.388329879 C1612131X 240 0 0 Gridl 180 145.25 1525152 402319.2 22.76698461 10.86874514 2.732724796 0.239878568 Quick decay C1612131X 241 0 0 Gridl 131.8541 122.558 1525099 402315.1 15.16765146 10.55248696 5.122421267 1.717013815 C1612131X 242 0 0 Gridl 172.5 128.75 1525139 402306.5 13.88018417 10.51412296 5.56350565 1.874658227 C1612131X 243 0 0 Gridl 174.75 95.5 1525130 402274.6 19.41954994 10.02328491 4.540313721 2.779210567 C1612131X 244 0 0 Gridl 125 179.25 1525113 402370.6 13.38722229 9.982906342 4.846124649 3.059894562 C1612131X 245 0 0 Gridl 132.25 52 1525075 402248.9 16.11248207 9.788309097 4.640208244 1.822806954 Possibly noise C1612131X 246 0 0 Gridl 177.25 81.5 1525127 402260.6 15.12132549 9.649341583 4.476563454 1.303598285 C1612131X 247 0 0 Gridl 112.75 8 1525041 402214.6 20.83536911 9.25860405 3.480504274 0.89680928 Quick decay C1612131X 248 0 0 Gridl 130.25 129.5 1525100 402322.2 12.83228111 8.7458601 5.134750843 3.087204695 C1612131X 249 0 0 Gridl 160 152.75 1525136 402333.4 12.98233986 8.655734062 4.094101429 1.045255065 C1612131X 250 0 0 Gridl 157.5 29 1525090 402218.5 12.83693886 8.251610756 4.541465759 3.198564529 Suspected noise C1612131X 251 0 0 Gridl 127.5 116.75 1525093 402311.2 19.07880592 8.060445786 2.276915789 0.47160235 Quick decay C1612131X 252 0 0 Gridl 159.75 59 1525103 402245.7 11.827672 7.967743874 3.655791044 0.827407837 Quick decay /I�NA 1 �GEOPFIYSICS IIVC. Subsurface feoylysxa(Su—ys, 1524840 1524850 1524860 1524870 1524880 1524890 1524900 1524910 1524920 1524930 1524940 1524950 1524960 1524970 1524980 1524990 N N a 12 49 32 j 55 f 51 g 84 < ffii 79- 31 9%31 61 8 �t3 25 38 IC 2s 100.34) 44 X 7 17� 43 53 35 L6 8A �1 14 40 9 4W) 0 I 70 33 24 61 - 50 _ R N gi 37 t o 82;t 16 30 26 - f � 45 pNp�� O C 5 Concrete Pad N_ f i g .o) 1524840 1524850 1524860 1524870 1524880 1524890 1524900 1524910 1524920 1524930 1524940 1524950 1524960 1524970 1524980 1524990 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 Channell my Legend O Area of Investigation — — Plate 2 Saturated Response Area --. PW Grosser 602 brush Culture(if noted) EM61 MK2 Bottom Coil- Person Portable e9 ` Base Station 602 Scale 1:150 Grid Area 2-Southwestern Grid 9 (1525020.09,402228.434) s o s to is zo zs 30 Selected Targetus survey foot Fishers Island,New York 2 p (see target list for ID and location) NAD83 r New York Long IsWnd(n US) Date of Map Creation:December 19,2016 Date of Survey:December 14,2016 State Plane Coordinates based on Base Station 602:(1525020.06,402228.434) Projed_ID Target_ID Polygon_Target KnownSource Location X_Local Y_Local X_SP Y_SP Chl_Final Ch2_Final Ch3_Final CM-Final Comments C1612131X 1 0 0 Grid2 131.15 0 1524963 402145.4 1292.184983 846.6897115 438.0247617 211.2284386 C1612131X 2 0 0 Grid2 36 12.5 1524876 402184.7 812.6257935 528.8877563 263.7723083 118.8539658 C1612131X 3 0 0 Grid2 42.5 2.5 1524879 402173.4 596.0499878 525.7744141 360.502594 250.5278931 C1612131X 4 0 0 Grid2 131.9497 4.996045 1524965 402149.8 539.907637 484.8532338 190.4692902 87.76443803 C1612131X 5 0 0 Grid2 119.48 0 1524951 402148.8 635.6517145 408.7901067 192.1212806 65.37579652 C1612131X 6 0 0 Grid2 60.75 15 1524900 402179.8 415.0239868 274.8483887 141.8236694 65.42932892 C1612131X 7 0 0 Grid2 125 7.5 1524959 402154.2 356.5736084 264.348114 158.9119263 92.79767609 C1612131X 8 0 0 Grid2 19.64159 1.653042 1524857 402179.2 380.3894964 262.4417682 150.2082787 76.94970614 C1612131X 9 0 0 Grid2 98 20 1524938 402173.7 413.6689148 249.004425 99.27052307 31.89913368 C1612131X 10 0 0 Grid2 119.25 5 1524953 402153.5 372.5057983 235.633255 111.6183548 39.48572922 C1612131X 11 0 0 Grid2 0 35 1524849 402216.3 334.6493441 233.1011879 160.1896775 86.16214346 C1612131X 12 0 0 Grid2 2 25 1524847 402206.3 286.8641968 190.8245239 89.15792847 29.98973465 C1612131X 13 0 0 Grid2 125.2924 10.11699 1524960 402156.6 277.3660954 186.7498039 106.0850813 50.6874129 C1612131X 14 0 0 Grid2 46.25 2.5 1524882 402172.3 209.2244263 164.5687408 110.448967 69.83063507 C1612131X 15 0 0 Grid2 127.414 5.142358 1524961 402151.3 200.2946371 137.7370552 67.74866757 28.15995062 C1612131X 16 0 0 Grid2 81.77223 5 1524917 402164.4 188.3713072 129.1444472 68.21289228 31.6134711 C1612131X 17 0 0 Grid2 19.88637 5.161514 1524858 402182.5 186.6139217 118.3450315 67.86810689 33.11093977 C1612131X 18 0 0 Grid2 108.5 10 1524944 402161.3 159.3521576 113.8777695 61.84952164 25.77108574 C1612131X 19 0 0 Grid2 94.48 35 1524939 402188.8 171.2943441 108.1361879 48.38967753 15.73214346 C1612131X 20 0 0 Grid2 96.05 22.5 1524937 402176.6 175.5684294 105.3410399 41.28727855 12.07136299 C1612131X 21 0 0 Grid2 17.95 35 1524866 402211 179.6893441 101.7411879 41.83967753 11.58714346 C1612131X 22 0 0 Grid2 19.25 32.75 1524866 402208.6 172.8325958 99.61741638 41.91817856 13.15703201 C1612131X 23 0 0 Grid2 145 35 1524987 402174.2 125.8643441 83.92118792 43.97467753 20.91214346 C1612131X 24 0 0 Grid2 106.75 17.5 1524945 402168.9 118.7331772 80.95516205 41.93535995 16.50162697 C1612131X 25 0 0 Grid2 24 12.5 1524864 402188.2 113.4812546 79.21175385 44.02109146 23.53142166 C1612131X 26 0 0 Grid2 108.75 15 1524946 402165.9 130.3007965 77.74982452 35.05757141 11.23464775 C1612131X 27 0 0 Grid2 100.75 15 1524939 402168.3 104.6890564 71.51159668 40.12536621 22.10578728 C1612131X 28 0 0 Grid2 5.13 35 1524854 402214.8 117.8493441 70.41118792 31.30467753 11.58714346 C1612131X 29 0 0 Grid2 93.25 32.75 1524937 402187.1 121.5500031 67.11573029 21.74140167 5.310642242 Quick decay C1612131X 30 0 0 Grid2 102.75 12.75 1524940 402165.6 93.48033905 65.21891785 36.78503799 20.04665756 C1612131X 31 0 0 Grid2 12 15 1524854 402194 98.63851929 63.11177826 30.84407234 11.99584675 C1612131X 32 0 0 Grid2 22 30.25 1524868 402205.4 93.88420105 62.52994537 33.72512436 16.94808769 C1612131X 33 0 0 Grid2 76.5 10.25 1524914 402170.8 87.36988068 61.75875092 34.99393082 17.9123745 C1612131X 34 0 0 Grid2 4.88 27.5 1524851 402207.8 98.75651381 61.68152775 28.70315939 11.40738924 C1612131X 35 0 0 Grid2 89.75 22.5 1524930 402178.5 97.50792694 61.25250244 31.46662903 13.39482594 C1612131X 36 0 0 Grid2 13.34642 33.90392 1524861 402211.4 91.30541018 58.09950378 29.9166058 13.6531489 C1612131X 37 0 0 Grid2 119.75 20 1524958 402167.4 89.59757233 53.47052002 21.20180511 6.471133232 Quick decay C1612131X 38 0 0 Grid2 25.5 14.75 1524866 402189.8 80.41597748 52.74666595 29.55233765 14.72609043 C1612131X 39 0 0 Grid2 141.5 25 1524981 402165.8 83.84408569 51.13199997 24.40618896 9.433615685 C1612131X 40 0 0 Grid2 48.75 4.75 1524885 402173.7 68.22421265 47.59185028 27.6737175 14.56914711 C1612131X 41 0 0 Grid2 122.73 35 1524966 402180.6 58.86434406 44.88118792 23.95467753 11.67214346 C1612131X 42 0 0 Grid2 109 32.5 1524952 402182.3 71.10243225 44.76709747 18.0788002 6.125229836 C1612131X 43 0 0 Grid2 90 27.5 1524932 402183.1 68.2751236 44.66128922 23.47257996 10.26300335 C1612131X 44 0 0 Grid2 31.5 10 1524871 402183.6 71.43013763 42.19832611 16.11235809 4.066301346 C1612131X 45 0 0 Grid2 117.25 15 1524954 402163.5 73.21009827 41.14861679 17.23689842 5.332098484 C1612131X 46 0 0 Grid2 132.08 35 1524975 402177.9 56.13934406 38.03618792 17.37467753 6.492143458 C1612131X 47 0 0 Grid2 132 10 1524967 402154.5 60.47336423 37.74711532 17.23723341 5.701330107 C1612131X 48 0 0 Grid2 84.42 3S 1524930 402191.7 47.39434406 36.22618792 22.28467753 14.24714346 C1612131X 49 0 0 Grid2 11.75 27.5 1524858 402205.8 51.31092453 34.694561 18.34851837 8.903736115 C1612131X 50 0 0 Grid2 140.5 29.75 1524981 402170.6 53.11250687 33.56584549 16.13012886 5.985202789 C1612131X 51 0 0 Grid2 6.75 22.75 1524851 402202.8 56.32264709 32.80545044 14.53768539 5.269834995 C1612131X 52 0 0 Grid2 136 20 1524974 402162.7 44.74846268 30.63780594 16.59729385 9.476461411 C1612131X 53 0 0 Grid2 93.37173 25.89408 1524935 402180.6 49.17640477 30.3974562 13.8011592 4.703665996 C1612131X 54 0 0 Grid2 94.75 30 1524938 402184.1 58.99718475 30.23246193 7.608467579 0.841864884 Quick decay C1612131X 55 0 0 Grid2 31.55717 32.67263 1524878 402204.9 43.50835667 29.49261115 17.73911688 6.350635796 C1612131X 56 0 0 Grid2 136.5 14.75 1524973 402157.7 45.77787399 26.44355392 13.21163559 6.223140717 C1612131X 57 0 0 Grid2 108.1759 22.46124 1524948 402173.1 40.21053591 26.39386454 13.48719001 6.106416 C1612131X 58 0 0 Grid2 131.25 30 1524973 402173.5 36.87321854 25.30288887 13.15229893 6.186057091 C1612131X 59 0 0 Grid2 3.25 7.5 1524843 402189.5 36.54245377 23.93878365 12.59491634 5.773835659 C1612131X 60 0 0 Grid2 38.75 17.5 1524880 402188.6 35.49052048 23.04685211 11.477211 5.452096939 C1612131X 61 0 0 Grid2 111.5015 19.99388 1524950 402169.8 42.71456566 22.39322849 8.661399217 2.497859512 C1612131X 62 0 0 Grid2 34 22.5 1524877 402194.6 30.0334301 20.73604012 10.08227825 3.051362991 C1612131X 63 0 0 Grid2 39.5 19.75 1524882 402190.5 33.83125305 20.7050724 7.932728767 2.38174963 C1612131X 64 0 0 Grid2 93.60291 17.62499 1524933 402172.8 33.22742072 20.22887728 10.02899714 3.827784005 C1612131X 65 0 0 Grid2 74.25 2.5 1524909 402164.2 23.0637188 17.3764534 8.846014977 4.409116268 C1612131X 66 0 0 Grid2 86 12.5 1524924 402170.2 24.30381012 17.18216515 8.114242554 4.645410538 C1612131X 67 0 0 Grid2 20.75 19.75 1524864 402195.9 27.76823425 16.05874443 5.834401131 1.458781242 C1612131X 68 0 0 Grid2 31.75 22.5 1524875 402195.3 23.02690125 15.89268494 9.044007301 2.996819258 C1612131X 69 0 0 Grid2 7 10 1524847 402190.8 21.86435318 15.8677845 8.690190315 4.494505882 C1612131X 70 0 0 Grid2 50.75 10 1524889 402178.1 22.2464695 15.6493721 7.867516041 3.755595922 C1612131X 71 0 0 Grid2 57.53145 5 1524894 402171.4 21.6990927 15.27624106 7.969264969 4.242017911 C1612131X 72 0 0 Grid2 42.25 10 1524881 402180.5 18.97711563 14.60125637 9.156729698 4.782140732 C1612131X 73 0 0 Grid2 11.25 2.5 1524849 402182.5 21.42187119 13.83772373 5.998403549 2.351418257 C1612131X 74 0 0 Grid2 131.25 25.25 1524971 402169 25.03809547 13.65959358 4.3323946 0.698280215 Quick decay C1612131X 75 0 0 Grid2 126.5 15 1524963 402160.8 28.7592907 13.44015884 4.213759422 1.21552217 C1612131X 76 0 0 Grid2 119.75 32.5 1524962 402179.1 18.34218788 13.09277821 6.431267262 3.452661514 C1612131X 77 0 0 Grid2 4.25 12.75 1524845 402194.1 20.23804474 12.92108917 6.860985279 2.93035984 C1612131X 78 0 0 Grid2 4.266631 15.11088 1524846 402196.3 22.05733445 12.09629356 6.914960384 3.098228931 C1612131X 79 0 0 Grid2 23.5 22.5 1524867 402197.7 16.15777016 11.31736565 5.84728241 2.913700104 C1612131X 80 0 0 Grid2 3.25 2.75 1524841 402185 17.60577393 11.17819214 4.810565472 1.516718984 C1612131X 81 0 0 Grid2 27.75 2.25 1524864 402177.5 17.82784081 11.01047134 4.712079048 2.260765076 C1612131X 82 0 0 Grid2 66 2.5 1524901 402166.6 15.84332752 10.56644917 5.254702091 3.205807924 Quick decay C1612131X 83 0 0 Grid2 115.5 24.75 1524956 402173.1 18.15725136 10.38990498 3.545837164 0.867553592 C1612131X 84 0 0 Grid2 24.5 25 1524869 402199.8 11.61495209 8.963294029 5.204917431 2.980613708 C1612131X 85 0 0 Grid2 127.25 29.75 1524969 402174.4 14.56741619 8.754872322 3.18875432 0.959299564 C1612131X 86 0 0 Grid2 1.25 15 1524843 402197.1 16.95967484 8.504912376 4.174441814 1.57913661 C1612131X 87 0 0 Grid2 10 5 1524848 402185.2 14.112813 8.224629402 3.477693796 1.166721225 C1612131X 88 1 0 Grid2 42.95135 25.36359 1524887 402194.7 999 999 999 999 Saturated Repsonse Area C1612131X 89 1 0 Grid2 67.5026 12.48188 1524906 402175.5 999 999 999 999 Saturated Repsonse Area C1612131X 90 1 0 Grid2 86.64919 0.055622 1524920 402158.3 999 999 999 999 Saturated Repsonse Area C1612131X 91 1 1 Grid2 137.4954 0.119021 1524969 402143.7 999 999 999 999 Saturated Repsonse Area;Concrete pad State Plane Coordinates based on Base Station 602: (1525020.06,402228.434) Project_ID Location Polygon_ID Point-ID Easting Northing C1612131X Grid2 88 1 1524879.961 402206.9 C1612131X Grid2 88 2 1524879.961 402199.3 C1612131X Grid2 88 3 1524886.654 402194.8 C1612131X Grid2 88 4 1524902.137 402196.9 C1612131X Grid2 88 5 1524905.6 402199.1 C1612131X Grid2 88 6 1524879.961 402206.9 C1612131X Grid2 89 1 1524907.66 402198.5 C1612131X Grid2 89 2 1524898.512 402187.8 C1612131X Grid2 89 3 1524905.83 402175.7 C1612131X Grid2 89 4 1524915.773 402172 C1612131X Grid2 89 5 1524928.183 402177.1 C1612131X Grid2 89 6 1524926.83 402192.7 C1612131X Grid2 89 7 1524907.66 402198.4 C1612131X Grid2 89 8 1524907.66 402198.5 C1612131X Grid2 90 1 1524920.148 402158.3 C1612131X Grid2 90 2 1524926.194 402163.9 C1612131X Grid2 90 3 1524940.433 402160.8 C1612131X Grid2 90 4 1524940.831 402152.1 C1612131X Grid2 90 5 1524920.069 402158.4 C1612131X Grid2 90 6 1524920.148 402158.3 C1612131X Grid2 91 1 1524989.673 402173.6 C1612131X Grid2 91 2 1524981.798 402167.9 C1612131X Grid2 91 3 1524981.718 402164.3 C1612131X Grid2 91 4 1524975.036 402157.7 C1612131X Grid2 91 5 1524971.377 402151.2 C1612131X Grid2 91 6 1524968.672 402143.7 C1612131X Grid2 91 7 1524979.65 402140.2 C1612131X Grid2 91 8 1524991.264 402173.2 C1612131X Grid2 91 9 1524989.673 402173.6 1524890 1524900 152 80 _4910 1524920 1524930 1524950 1524960 1524970 1524980 15249 -- ------------------------------ ------- yi� I 7f5 I I I I ' I I I I I N aO I f I I I _ N I I I I I I ' I I Wooded Area •I , ' I I ~ O I I I I I Wooded Area I I I I I I i 1 I I I , I I , I Wooded Area I t (0 Wooded Area 8) p 9 1.+ Wooded Area I N z=` I 0 001 • i sA D woaa F®rte I 29, f I aa 2 I O A, 1 I J O 19 I Mfr I `7 0) 1 -- -1--------- 1524890 -------1524890 1524900 1524910 1524920 1524930 1524940 1524950 1524980 1524970 1524980 1524990 Legend Area of Investigation Plate 3 Scale 1:120 El Saturated Response Area PW Groser 5 0 5 10 15 EM61 MK2 Bottom Coil-Person Portable US sumy foot 602 brush Culture(if noted) NADe3)—Yak Lag I-M(IIDS) Base Station 602 Grid Area 3-Northwestern Grid S�NA�VA & (1525020.o9,4ozzz8.4sa) Fishers Island,New York GEOPHYSICS INC. ysicaCSurveyr Selected Target Date of Map Creation:December 19,2016 Subsurface G zp (see target lost for ID and location) Date of Survey:December 14,2016 State Plane Coordinates based on Base Station 602:(1525020.06,402228.434) Project ID Target_ID Polygon_Target KnownSource Location X_Local Y_Local X_SP Y_SP Chl_Final Ch2_Final Ch3_Final CM-Final Comments C1612131X 1 0 0 Grid3 10 27.5 1524904 402402.2 457.4453125 353.81427 228.4778442 149.315918 C1612131X 2 0 0 Grid3 25.5 15 1524914 402385.3 231.3433533 163.0522156 87.54110718 38.08467865 C1612131X 3 0 0 Grid3 4.090611 16.06576 1524894 402394 407.9908582 156.2520718 26.9235564 1.368294737 C1612131X 4 0 0 Grid3 12.13925 25.12048 1524905 402399.3 332.3194215 142.0351141 45.24579409 15.03422074 C1612131X 5 0 0 Grid3 56.75 5 1524939 402364.5 154.5197449 120.1615982 72.79083252 44.23136139 C1612131X 6 0 0 Grid3 34.75 2.5 1524918 402370.5 155.6041107 95.05397797 41.2456131 12.76418495 C1612131X 7 0 0 Grid3 3.85 0 1524888 402379.8 152.1982265 94.45006481 38.96655084 12.0873008 C1612131X 8 0 0 Grid3 0 5 1524886 402385.7 120.2124649 76.88674159 39.44970261 10.53968544 C1612131X 9 0 0 Grid3 9.75 2.5 1524895 402379.8 98.46696472 74.91251373 45.67327881 27.85063744 C1612131X 10 0 0 Grid3 69.5 25 1524958 402378.1 87.12744904 63.19483948 36.59435654 21.17583656 C1612131X 11 0 0 Grid3 85.11 0 1524963 402349.3 86.40645161 61.11903226 32.35958695 14.24890988 C1612131X 12 0 0 Grid3 1.52 7.5 1524889 402387.3 77.84754894 51.76163494 25.40291342 7.192320885 C1612131X 13 0 0 Grid3 96.75 35 1524987 402377.2 68.64293671 41.48791122 18.8121109 6.676494122 C1612131X 14 0 0 Grid3 97.75 32.75 1524987 402374.8 62.40124893 37.76571655 18.22896576 7.670619488 C1612131X 15 0 0 Grid3 53.9 0 1524934 402361 57.80180386 35.50508749 15.67193235 5.703862161 C1612131X 16 0 0 Grid3 36.25 22.5 1524927 402388.2 41.47836304 32.08865356 19.36909294 10.27528381 C1612131X 17 0 0 Grid3 94.75 20.25 1524980 402364.4 41.5134697 26.98158264 12.69993496 4.494771004 C1612131X 18 0 0 Grid3 4.17 10 1524892 402388.6 40.45273033 26.95955831 12.70546675 3.746116495 C1612131X 19 0 0 Grid3 94.75 22.25 1524980 402366.2 39.56261444 25.36230659 11.27693367 3.761931658 C1612131X 20 0 0 Grid3 93.25 25 1524980 402369.3 33.51205444 21.83633041 12.20843983 5.823660851 C1612131X 21 0 0 Grid3 96.25 30.25 1524985 402373 33.05263519 21.79338264 12.28314495 5.43603754 C1612131X 22 0 0 Grid3 78 25 1524966 402375 28.80492401 21.52434731 12.81673717 7.289400101 C1612131X 23 0 0 Grid3 93 30 1524982 402374 25.06031799 16.75980568 8.706762314 4.116091251 C1612131X 24 0 0 Grid3 28.25 19.75 1524918 402388.6 28.41228294 15.89396954 6.796867847 2.297128439 C1612131X 25 0 0 Grid3 94.25 12.5 1524976 402357.4 22.31648827 13.7239542 5.869173527 1.636340499 Likely EOL tree bump C1612131X 26 0 0 Grid3 88.5 32.5 1524978 402378 18.86797142 12.73666954 6.691421032 2.128191233 Likely EOL tree bump C1612131X 27 0 0 Grid3 85.25 25 1524973 402372.3 17.35498238 12.53983974 6.431304455 3.765775442 C1612131X 28 0 0 Grid3 99 47.5 1524993 402387.9 21.46919572 12.39209475 5.464563392 1.879292923 Likely EOL tree bump C1612131X 29 0 0 Grid3 85.25 29.25 1524974 402376.2 18.49935341 12.11788273 6.814198971 2.811933517 C1612131X 30 0 0 Grid3 65.26 0 1524945 402356.7 16.63593086 12.0972073 6.83088936 3.777824001 C1612131X 31 0 0 Grid3 66.25 4.75 1524948 402360.7 16.26766396 12.03972626 7.017581463 4.288187504 C1612131X 32 0 0 Grid3 70.25 7.5 1524952 402361.8 28.74345207 11.95341682 2.226017237 0.052557074 C1612131X 33 0 0 Grid3 91.75 47.5 1524987 402390.6 15.62919617 11.78209496 6.424563408 3.879292965 C1612131X 34 0 0 Grid3 45.5 5 1524929 402368.4 15.94491959 11.12067699 5.600598335 2.253893852 C1612131X 35 0 0 Grid3 26.25 5 1524911 402375.9 16.92201614 10.33300591 5.247108459 2.53699398 C1612131X 36 0 0 Grid3 385 20 1524928 402385 13.85774231 10.00293732 5.370318413 2.427783966 C1612131X 37 0 0 Grid3 90.75 45 1524985 402388.7 13.83261204 9.376651764 5.376991749 2.874569893 Appendix C Predicted EM61-MK2 Response of Select Standard Munitions Items The content below is summarized from the publication: Authors: H.H.Nelson, T. Bell,J. Kingdon,N.Khadr, and D.A. Steinhurst Title: EM61-MK2 Response of Standard Munitions Items ESTCP Report Number:NRL/MR/6110--08-9155 Date: October 6,2008 One approach to selecting a minimum response threshold for selection of targets from the EM61 MK2 response is to consider the predicted sensor response of potential munitions that may be encountered at the site. The response of several standard munitions items have been modeled and predicted response values for the least favorable orientation at various depths are tabulated, Table 1. This allows an estimate of the maximum depth of reliable detection for the selected munition items. Predicted response for select munitions plotted as a function of depth is presented in Chart 1. The number of selected targets with relation to the selected minimum response threshold is presented in Chart 2. Photos of the select munitions items,which represent a range of sizes from small to large, are included in Figures 1 through 4. Table 1 -Predicted depth of detection for select munition items in their least favorable orientation for the sensor deployed on its standard wheels which correspond to the bottom coil 42 cm above the ground. Gate 2 Dept of Detection inches below surface Selected Threshold 37-mm 60-mm 81-mm 155-mm Targets above (m —projectile mortar mortar projectile Threshold 8 9.1" 20.1" 21.7" 53.1" 376 10 7.5" 18.5" 20.1" 50.4" 362 15 5.1" 15.7" 16.9" 45.7" 318 25 2.8" 12.2" 13.4" 40.2" 240 50 - 7.9" 9.1" 33.1" 154 100 - 3.9" 5.1" 27.2" 82 Chart 1 - Predicted EM61-MK2 Signal at the Second Time Gate as a Function of Depth 10000 Legend — — — 8mv target selection threshold 37mm least favorable orientation 60mm least favorable orientation 1000 81 mm least favorable orientation 155mm least favorable orientation 100 E c ca 10 \ _ 1 0.1 —T T 0 20 40 60 Depth below surface (inches) Chart 2 - Number of Selected EM61-MK2 Selected Targets vs. Minimum Threshold Response 200 Legend Target Count 8mV Threshold 10mV Threshold 160 15mV Threshold 25mV Threshold 50mV Threshold 100mV Threshold E a, 120 CO CO a) a a� c� a) E i= 80 0 C 0 U a) U) 40 0 100 200 300 400 Number of Selected Targets Figure l —A 155-mm projectile Figure 2 —81-mm mortar Figure 3 —A 60-mm mortar Figure 4—A 37-mm projectile APPENDIX B LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS P.W.Grosser Consulting•630 Johnson Avenue,Suite 7• Bohemia, NY 11716 PH 631.589.6353• FX 631.589.8705•www.pwgrosser.com New York,NY•Syracuse, NY•Seattle,WA•Shelton,CT Serial No:01061717:14 k �} ANALYTICAL REPORT Lab Number: L1640950 Client: P.W.Grosser 630 Johnson Avenue Suite 7 Bohemia, NY 11716 ATTN: Ryan Morley Phone: (631)589-6353 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 J The original project report/data package is held by Alpha Analytical.This report/data package is paginated and should be reproduced only in its entirety.Alpha Analytical holds no responsibility for results and/or data that are not consistent with the original. Certifications&Approvals. MA(M-MA086),NY (11148),CT(PH-0574),NH(2003),NJ NELAP(MA935),Rl(LA000065),ME(MA00086), PA(68-03671),VA(460195),MD(348),IL(200077),NC(666),TX(T104704476),DOD(1-2217),USDA(Permit #P-330-11-00240). Eight Walkup Drive,Westborough, MA 01581-1019 508-898-9220 (Fax)508-898-9193 800-624-9220-www.alphalab.com /`�Ll1 HA Page 1 of 60 Serial No:0106171 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 Alpha Sample Collection Sample ID Client ID Matrix Location Date/Time Receive Date L1640950-01 S-1 (0-0.5) SOIL FISHERS ISLAND, NY 12/13/16 09:10 12/15/16 L1640950-02 S-2 (4-6) SOIL FISHERS ISLAND, NY 12/13/16 11:20 12/15/16 L1640950-03 S-3 (0-0.5) SOIL FISHERS ISLAND, NY 12/13/16 11:40 12/15/16 L1640950-04 S-4(0-0.5) SOIL FISHERS ISLAND, NY 12/13/16 12:20 12/15/16 L1640950-05 S-5(2-4) SOIL FISHERS ISLAND, NY 12/13/16 15:00 12/15/16 L1640950-06 S-6 (0-0.5) SOIL FISHERS ISLAND, NY 12/14/16 08:30 12/15/16 .J L1640950-07 S-7 (0-0.5) SOIL FISHERS ISLAND, NY 12/14/16 09:15 12/15/16 L1640950-08 S-8 (2-4) SOIL FISHERS ISLAND, NY 12/13/16 11:00 12/15/16 Page 2 of 60 1/ HA Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 1 01/06/17 Case Narrative The samples were received in accordance with the Chain of Custody and no significant deviations were encountered during the preparation or analysis unless otherwise noted.Sample Receipt,Container Information,and the Chain of Custody are located at the'back of the report. Results contained within this report relate only to the samples submitted under this Alpha Lab Number and meet NELAP requirements for all NELAP accredited parameters unless otherwise noted in the following narrative.The data presented in this report is organized by parameter (i.e.VOC,SVOC,etc.).Sample specific Quality Control data(i.e.Surrogate Spike Recovery)is reported at the end of the target analyte list for each individual sample,followed by the Laboratory Batch Quality Control at the end of each parameter.Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICS),if requested,are reported for compounds identified to be present and are not part of the method/program Target Compound List, even if only a subset of the TCL are being reported.If a sample was re-analyzed or re-extracted due to a required quality control corrective action and if both sets of data are reported,the Laboratory ID of the re-analysis or re-extraction is designated with an"R"or"RE", respectively.When multiple Batch Quality Control elements are reported(e.g.more than one LCS),the associated samples for each element ,are noted in the grey shaded header line of each data table.Any Laboratory Batch,Sample Specific%"recovery or RPD value that is outside the listed Acceptance Criteria is bolded in the report.All specific QC information is also incorporated in the Data Usability format of our Data Merger tool where it can be reviewed along with any associated usability implications.Soil/sediments,solids and tissues are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted.Definitions of all data qualifiers and acronyms used in this report are provided in the Glossary located at the back of the report. i In reference to questions H(CAM)or 4(RCP)when"NO"is checked,the performance criteria for CAM and RCP methods allow for some quality control failures to occur and still be within method compliance. In these instances the specific failure is not narrated but noted in the associated QC table.The information is also incorporated in the Data Usability format of our Data Merger tool where it can be reviewed along with any associated usability implications. Please see the associated ADEx data file for a comparison of laboratory reporting limits that were achieved with the regulatory Numerical Standards requested on the Chain of Custody. HOLD POLICY For samples submitted on hold,Alpha's policy is to hold'samples(with the exception of Air canisters)free of charge for 21 calendar days from the date the project is completed.After 21 calendar days,we will dispose of all samples submitted including those put on hold unless you have contacted your Client Service Representative and made arrangements for Alpha to continue to hold the samples.Air canisters will be disposed after 3 business days from the date the project is completed. Please contact Client Services at 800-624-9220 with any questions. I L11:PHA Page 3 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 Case Narrative(continued) Report Submission This final report replaces the partial report issued December 23,2016 and includes the results of all requested analyses. The analysis of Explosives was subcontracted.A copy of the laboratory report is included as an addendum. Please note:This data is only available in PDF format and is not available on Data Merger. All non-detect(ND)or estimated concentrations(J-qualified) have been quantitated to the limit noted in the MDL column. Metals L1640950-01 through-08:The sample has elevated detection limits for all elements,with the exception of mercury,due to the dilution required by matrix interferences encountered during analysis. The WG962161-3 MS recoveries, performed on L1640950-01, are outside the acceptance criteria for magnesium (71%)and potassium (73%).A post digestion spike was performed and was within,acceptance criteria. The WG962161-3 MS recoveries for aluminum (611%)and iron (815%), performed on L1640950-01,do not apply because the sample concentrations are greater than four times the spike amounts added. The WG963175-3 MS recovery, performed on L1640950-01, is outside the acceptance criteria for zirconium (28%).A post digestion spike was performed and yielded an unacceptable recovery for zirconium (137%).This has been attributed to sample matrix. The WG962161-4 Laboratory Duplicate RPD, performed on L1640950-01, is outside the acceptance criteria for potassium (58%).The elevated RPD has been attributed to the non-homogeneous nature of the native sample. I,the undersigned, attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, to the best of my knowledge and belief and based upon my personal inquiry of those responsible for providing the information contained in this analytical report,such information is accurate and complete. This certificate of analysis is not complete unless this page accompanies any and all pages of this report. Authorized Signature: Melissa Cripps- Title: ripps-Title: Technical Director/Representative Date: 01/06/17 Page 4 of 60 �� Serial No:01061717:14 METALS ZA Page 5 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: - L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 SAMPLE RESULTS ;Lab ID: L1640950-01 Date Collected: 12/13/16 09:10 Client ID: S-1 (0-0.5) Date Received: 12/15/16 Sample Location: FISHERS ISLAND, NY Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil Percent Solids: 81% Dilution Date Date Prep Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Method Analyst L.Total Metals-Mansfield'Lab,�. � - --- : : _.,..., __ _ Aluminum,Total _ 8200 mg/kg _ 9.8 2.6 2 12/16/1620:0012/19/1623:38 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Antimony,Total 0.54 J m /k _ 4.9 0.37 2 12/16/16 20:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC -- - - - --- --- -g g - --- - - Arsenic,Total 1.6 _ mg/kg 0.98 0.20 2 12/16/16 20:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Barium,Total 25 mg/kg 0.98 0.17 2 12/16/1620:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 30506 1,6010C MC Beryllium,Total 0.31 J mg/kg 0_49 0.03 2 12/16/16 20:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Cadmium,Total ND mg/kg _ 0.98 0.10 2 12/16/16 20:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Calcium,Total 630 9.8 3.4 2 12/16/16 20:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 30506 1,6010C MC, Chromium,Total 6.9 mg/kg 0.98 0.09 2 12/16/16 20:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Cobalt,Total 2.8 mg/kg 2.0 0.16 2 12/16/16 20:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Copper,Total 7.7 mg/kg 0.98 0.25 2 12/16/16 20:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Iron,Total 8900 mg/kg - 4.9 0.88 2 12/16/16 20:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Lead,Total 16 mg/kg 4.9 0.26 2 12/16/16 20:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC lagnesium,Total 1300 mg/kg 9.8 1.5 2 12/16/16 20:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Manganese,Total 140 mg/kg 0.98 0.16 2 12/16/16 20:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 30506 1,6010C MC Mercury,Total 0.21 mg/kg 0.08 0.02 1 12/16/16 09:0012/17/16 19:09 EPA 7471 B 1,7471 B BV Nickel,Total 4.6 mg/kg--- 2.4 - 0.24 2 12/16/16 20:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Potassium,Total 580 mg/kg 240 14. 2 12/16/16 20:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Selenium,Total ND mg/kg 2.0 0.25 2 12/16/16 20:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Silver,Total ND mg/kg_ 0.98 0.28 2 12/16/16 20:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Sodium,Total 49 J mg/kg 200 3.1 2 12/1-6/16-20:00-1-2/19/1-6 23.38 EPA 30506 1,6010C MC Thallium,Total ND mg/kg 2.0 0.31 2 12/16/16 20:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Vanadium,Total 14 __mg/kg _ 0.98 0.20 2 12/16/16 20:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Zinc,Total 26 mg/kg 4.9` 0.29 2 12/16/16 20:0012/19/16 23:38 EPA 30506 ' 1,6010C MC Zirconium,Total _ 1.7 _ J mg/kg 2.0 0.24 10 12/20/16 20:1612/23/16 14:17 EPA 3050B 1,6020A TT Page 6 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 SAMPLE RESULTS )Lab ID: L1640950-02 Date Collected: 12/13/16 11:20 Client ID: S-2(4-6) Date Received: 12/15/16 Sample Location: FISHERS ISLAND, NY Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil Percent Solids: 90% Dilution Date Date Prep Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Method Analyst Total Metals-Mansfield Lab Aluminum,Total 5400 _ _ mg/kg 8.7 2.4 _2 12/16/16 20:0012120/16 01:39 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Antimony,Total ND _ mg/kg 4.4 0.33 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01.39 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Arsenic,Total 1.2mg/kg 0.87 0.18 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01.39 EPA 305-- 1,6010C MC Barium,Total 21 _ mg/kg T 0.87_ 0.15 2 12/16/16 20:0012120/16 01:39 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Beryllium,Total 0.18 _J _ mg/kg 0.44 - 0.03_ 2 _12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:39 EPA 3050B 1,6010C T MC Cadmium,Total ND mg/kg 0.87 0.09 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:39 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Calcium,Total 490 mg/kg 8.7 3.0 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:39 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Chromium,Total 6.2 _ m /k 0.87 0.08 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:39 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Cobalt,Total 3.0 mg/kg _ 1.7 0.14 2 12/16/1620:00 12/20116 01:39 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Copper,Total 6.5 mg/kg 0.87 0.22 2 _ 12/16/16 20:0012120/16 01:39 EPA 30508 1,6010C----- MC Iron,Total 7800 mg/kg _ 4.4 0.79 2 12/16/16 20:0012120/16 01:39 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Lead,Total 8.2 mg/kg 4.4 0.23 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:39 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC lagnesium,Total 1300 mg/kg 8_7 1.3 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:39 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Manganese,Total_ 100 m /k 0.87 0.14 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:39 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC - - - - - - -- -- -g-9- Mercury,Total 0.12 mg/kg 0.07 0.02 1 12/16/1600012/17 9: 116 19.15 EPA 7471 B 1,7471 B BV Nickel,Total 4.3 mg/kg 2.2 0.21 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01.39'EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Potassium,Total 540 _ mg/kg 220 12. 2- 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:39 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Selenium,Total ND mglkg 1.7 0.22 2 12/16/1620:0012120/1601:39 EPA-3050B----1,601-OC---- MC Silver,Total ND mg/kg_ 0_87 0.25 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:39 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Sodium,Total 34 J mg/kg_ 170 2.7 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:39 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Thallium,Total ND mg/kg 1.7 0.27 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:39 EPA 30508 1,6010C _MC Vanadium,Total 12 mg/kg 0.87 0.18 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20116 01:39 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Zinc,Total 19 mg/kg 4.4 0.26 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:39 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Zirconium,Total _ 0.70 J mg/k%__ 1.7 0.20 10 12/20/16 20:16 12/23/16 14 22 EPA 3050B 1,6020A TT Page 7 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 SAMPLE RESULTS iLab ID: L1640950-03 Date Collected: 12/13/16 11:40 Client ID: S-3,(0-0.5) Date Received: 12/15/16 Sample Location: FISHERS ISLAND, NY Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil Percent Solids: 91% Dilution Date Date Prep Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Method Analyst ... .._.__.r..__.___....,----------...___� ---._.. --- Total Metals-Mansfield,Lab Aluminum,Total 4200 mg/kg_ 8.6 2.3 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:43 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Antimony,Total 0.52 J ,_mg/kg 4.3 0.33 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:43 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Arsenic,Total 2.7 mg/kg 0.86 0.18_ 2 12/16/16 20:0012120/16 01.43 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Barium,Total 43 mg/kg 0.86 0.15 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:43 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Beryllium,Total 0.15 J mg/kg 0.43 0.03 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01.43 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Cadmium,Total __O._16___ J mg/kg -0.86- 0.08 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:43 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Calcium,Total 940 mg/ 8.6 3.0 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:43 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Chromium,Total 6.3 mg/kg 0_86 0.08 2 12/16/16 20:0012120/16 01:43 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Cobalt,Total _2.7 mg/kg 1.7 0.14 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:43 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Copper,Total 29 mg/kg 0.86 0.22 2 12/16/16 20:0012120/16 01.43 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Iron,.Total 11000 _ mg/kg 4.3 0.78 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:43 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Lead,Total 120 mg/kg 4.3 0.23 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:43 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC lagneswm,Total 1300 mg/kg 8.6 1.3 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01.43 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Manganese,Total 130 mg/kg 0.86 0.14 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:43 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC - - - - Mercury,Total 0.08 mglkg 0.07 0_.02 1 12/16/16 09.0012117/16 19:16 EPA 7471 B 1,747113 BV Nickel,Total 4.2 m !k _2.2 0.21 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:43 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Potassium,Total 710 mg/kg 220 12. 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:43 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Selenium,Total ND mg/kg 1.7 0.22 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:43 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Silver,Total ND mg/kg 0.86 0.24 2 12/16/1620:001212011601:43 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Sodium,Total 54 J mg/kg _170 2.7 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:43 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Thallium,Total ___ ND mg/kg 1.7 0.27 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:43 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Vanadium,Total 12 mg/kg 0.86 0.17 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:43 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Zinc,Total _ 91mglkg 4.3 0.25 _ 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:43 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Zirconium,Total 0.61 J mg/kg 1.7 0.20 10 12/20/16 20:1612/23/16 14.25 EPA 3050B 1,6020A TT ��?HA Page 8 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: . FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 SAMPLE RESULTS ;Lab ID: L1640950-04 Date Collected: 12/13/16 12:20 Client ID: j S-4(0-0.5) Date Received: 12/15/16 Sample Location: FISHERS ISLAND, NY Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil Percent Solids: 88% Dilution Date Date Prep Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Method Analyst Total Metals-Mansfield Labe � r Aluminum,Total 6500 _ mg/kg 9.0 2.4 _ 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:47 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Antimony,Total ND _mg/kg 4.5 0.34 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:47 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Arsenic,Total 1.6 mg/kg 0.90 0.19 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:47 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Barium,Total 29 mg/kg 0.90 _0.16 _ 2 12/16/16 20_0012/20/16 01:47 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Beryllium,Total 0.24_ J mg/kg 0.45 0.03 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:47 EPA 30506 1,6010C MC Cadmium,Total ND mg/kg 0.90 0.09 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:47 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Calcium,Total _ 1300- mg/kg 9.0 3.1 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:47 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Chromium,Total V 6.6 mg/kg 0.90 0.09 _ 2 T 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:47 EPA 30506 1,6010C MC Cobalt,Total 2.6 mg/kg_ 1.8_ 0.15 ___2_____12116/_1620:0012120/16_01:47 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Copper,Total 31 mg/kg 0.90 0.23 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01.47 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Iron,Total 7800 mg/kg 4.5 0.81 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:47 EPA 3050B 1,6010C --MC Lead,Total 26 mg/kg__ 4.5 0.24 2 12/16/1620:0012/20/16 01:47 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC lagnesium,Total 1400 mg/kg 9_0 1.4 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:47 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Manganese,Total 130 mg/kg_ 0;90 0.14 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:47 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Mercury,Total 0.12 mg/kg 0.07 0.02 1 12/16/16 09:0012/17/16 19.18 EPA 74718 1,7471 B BV Nickel,Total 4.5 mg/kg -2_2 0.22 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01.47 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Potassium,Total 700 mg/kg_ 220 13. 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:47 EPA 30506 1,6010C MC Selenium,Total ND- __ mg/kg _ 1.8 0.23 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:47 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Silver,Total ND mg/kg 0.90 0.25 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:47 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Sodium,Total 48 J mg/kg 180 2.8 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 0147 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Thallium,Total_ ND mg/kg 1.8 0.28 2--,- 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01.47 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Vanadium,Total 13 mg/kg 0.90 0.18 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:47 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Zinc,Total _ 31 mg/kg 4.5_ 0.26 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:47 EPA 30506 1,6010C MC Zirconium,Total 1.4 J mg/kg_ _1.8 0.21 10 12/20/16 20:1612/23/16 14:27 EPA 30508 1,6020A TT ' L1L'?HA Page 9 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 - SAMPLE RESULTS ,Lab ID: L1640950-05 Date Collected: 12/13/16 15:00 Client ID: S-5(2-4) Date Received: 12/15/16 Sample Location: FISHERS ISLAND, NY Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil Percent Solids:' 91 Dilution Date Date Prep Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Method Analyst a Total Metals:Mansfield Lab Aluminum,Total 4600 mg/kg 8.6 2.3 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:52 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Antimony,Total ND mg/kg 4.3 0.32 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:52, EPA 30506 1,6010C MC Arsenic,Total 1.4 mg/kgT 0.86 0.18 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01.52 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Barium,Total 23 mg/kg_ 0.86 0.15 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:52 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Beryllium,Total 0.14 _ J mg/kg 0.43 0.03 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:52 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Cadmium,Total ND mg/kg0.86 0.08 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:52 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Calcium,Total 860 mg/kg 8.6 3.0 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:52 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Chromium,Total 7.7 mg/kg 0.86 0.08 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/1601:52 EPA 30506 1,6010C MC Cobalt,Total 2.8 mg/kg 1.7 0.14 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:52 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Copper,Total 10_ mg/kg__ 0.86 0.22 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:52 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Iron,Total 6900 - mg/kg 4.3 0.77 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:52 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Lead,Total 9.6 mg/kg 4.3 0.23 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:52 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC --- - ,,agnesium,Total 1300 mg/kg_ 8.6 1.3 2 12/16/1620:0012/20/1601:52 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Manganese,Total 95 mg/kg 0.86 0.14 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:52 EPA 30506 1,60109 MC Mercury,Total W 0.02 J mg/kg 0.07 '0.02 1 12/16/16 09:0012/17/16 19.20 EPA 7471 B 1,7471B BV, Nickel,Total 5.0 mg/kg2.1 0.21 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20!16 01-52 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Potassium,Total _880 __ ____mg/kg 210 12. 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:52 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Selenium,Total ND mg/kg 1.7. 0.22 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01.52 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Silver,Total ND mg/kg 0.86 0.24 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01.52 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Sodium,Total 37 J mg/kg 170 2.7 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:52 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Thallium,Total ND __ mg/kg 1.7 0.27 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:52 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Vanadium,Total 11mg/kg 0.86 0.17 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:52 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Zinc,Total 25 mg/kg 4.3 _ 0.25 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01.52 EPA'305013 1,6010C MC Zirconium,Total 0.32 _ J mg/kg 1.7 0.20 10 12/20/16 20:1612/23/16 15:02 EPA 30506 1,6020A TT Page 10 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 SAMPLE RESULTS ( ;Lab ID: L1640950-06 Date Collected: 12/14/16 08:30 Client ID: S-6(0-0.5) Date Received: 12/15/16 Sample Location: FISHERS ISLAND, NY Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil Percent Solids: 69% • Dilution Date Date Prep Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed' Method Method Analyst Total Metals-Mansfield Lab Aluminum,Total 4200 mg/kg 11 3.0 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:56 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Antimony,Total ND _ _ mg/kg 5.5 0.42 2� 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:56 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Arsenic,Total 1.1 mg/kg 1.1 0.23 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01.56 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Barium,Total 40 mg/kg_ 1.1 0.19 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16'01:56 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Beryllium,Total - 0.15 J mg/kg_ 0.55 0.04_ 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:56 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Cadmium,Total 0.14 J mg/kg 1.1 _0.11 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:56 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Calcium,Total 3100 mg/kg 11 3.9 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:56 EPA 3050B' 1,6010C MC Chromium,Total 5.8 mg/kg_ 1.1 0.11 2 12/16/1620:0012/20/1601:56 EPA 3050B' 1,6010C MC Cobalt,Total 2.0 J mg/kg_ 2.2 0.18 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01.56 EPA 30506 1,6010C MC Copper,Total 18 _mg/kg 1.1 0.28 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01.56 EPA 3050B _1,6010C MC Iron,Total__ �i 5500 mg/kg 5.5 1.0_ 2_12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:56 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Lead,Total• 57 _Mg/kg__ 5.5 0.30 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:56 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC lagnesium,_Total 1100 _ mg/kg 11 1.7 2 12/16/1620:00 12/20/16 01:56 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Manganese,Total '95 mg/kg 1.1 0.18 2 12/16/16-20:0012/20/16 01:56 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Mercury,Total 0.08 J mg/kg 0.09 0.02 1 12/16/16 09:0012117/16 19:22 EPA 7471 B 1,7471 B• BV Nickel,Total 3.7 mg/kg 2.8 0.27 _ 2 12/16/16 20:00 12/20/16 01.56 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Potassium,Total 580 mg/kg _ 280 16. 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:56 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Selenium,Total ND mg/kg 2.2 0.28 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:56 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Silver,Total ND mg/kg _ 1.1 0.31 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01.56 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Sodium,Total 53 J mg/kg 220 3.5 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01.56 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Thallium,Total ND mg/kg 2.2 0.35 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:56 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Vanadium,Total 9.9 mg/kg _1.1 0.22 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:56 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Zinc,Total 57 _ mg/kg 5.5_ 0.32 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 01:56 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Zirconium,Total 1.7 J mg/kg 2:3 0.27 10 12/20/16 20:1612/23/16 15:10 EPA 3050B 1,6020A TT F { /(/4PHA Page 11 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 SAMPLE RESULTS `Lab ID: L1640950-07 Date Collected: 12/14/16 09:15 Client ID: S-7(0-0.5) Date Received: 12/15/16 Sample Location: FISHERS ISLAND, NY Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil Percent Solids: 85%, Dilution Date Date Prep Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Method Analyst,- ______. Total Metals-Mansfield Lab Aluminum,Total _ 3700 Y mg/kg 9.0 2.4 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:00 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Antimony,Total ND mg/kg 4.5 0.34 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:00 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Arsenic,Total 1.2 mg/kg 0.90 0.19 2 12/16/1620:0012/2611602:00 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Barium,Total 26 mg/kg 0.90 0.16 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02_00 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Beryllium,Total _ 0.14 J mg/k% 0.45 0.03 _ 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:00 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Cadmium,Total ND -TR/KgL 0.90 0.09 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:00 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Calcium,Total 750 mg/kg LL 9.0 3.2 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:00 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Chromium,Total 4.7mg/kg 0.90 0.09 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:00 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Cobalt,Total 2.3 mg/kg 1.8 0.15 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:00 EPA:3050B 1,6010C MC Copper,Total 51 mg/kg 0.90 0.23 2 12/16/16 20:00 12/20/160200 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Iron,Total _ 5300 mg/kg 4.5� 0.82 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:00 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Lead,Total 70 mg/kg 4.5 0.24 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:00 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC lagnesium,Total 1100mg/kg 9.0 1.4 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:00 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Man anese,Total 91 mg/kg. 0.90' 0.14 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02.00 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Mercury,Total 0.12 mg/kg_ 0.08 0.02 1 12/16/16 09:0012/17/16 19:24 EPA 7471B 1,7471 B BV Nickel,Total 4.1 mg/kg 2.3 0.22 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:00 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Potassium,Total 580 mg/kg _ 230 13. 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:00 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Selenium,Total ND mg/kg 1.8 0.23 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:00 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Silver,Total ND mg/kg 0.90 0.26 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:00 EPA 3050B, 1,6010C MC Sodium,Total 46 J mg/kg 180 2.8, 2 12116/16 20:00 12/20/16 02 00 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Thallium,Total _ND mg/kg 1.8 0.28 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02.00 EPA 305013 1,6010C MC Vanadium,Total 9.5 mg/kg 0.90 0.18 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:00 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Zinc,Total 39 _ mg/kg 4.5 0.26 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:00 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Zirconium,Total 0.35 J mg/kg 1.8 0.22 10 12/20/16 20:1612/23/16 15:12 EPA 3050B 1,6020A TT Page 12 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 SAMPLE RESULTS Lab ID: L1640950-08 Date Collected: 12/13/16 11:00 Client ID: S-8(2-4) Date Received: 12/15/16 Sample Location: FISHERS ISLAND, NY Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil Percent Solids: 92% Dilution Date Date Prep Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Method Analyst Total Metals_-Mansfield Lab __.. Aluminum,Total 4500 , mg/kg 8.6 2.3 -2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:05 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Antimony,Total ND mg/kg 4_3 0.33 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:05 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Arsenic,Total 0.59 J mg/kg 0.86 0.18 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02.05 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Barium,Total 20 mg/kg 036 0_15 2 y 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:05 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Beryllium,Total 0.15 - - J mg/kg 0.43 T 0.03 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:05 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Cadmium,Total ND mg/kg 0.86 0.09 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:05 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Calcium,Total 500 mg/kg 8.6 3.0 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:05 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Chromium,Total 5.5 mg/kg 0.86 0.08 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:05 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Cobalt,Total 2.9 mg/kg___ 1.7 0.14 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:05 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC Copper,Total 5.6 mg/kg 0.86 0.22 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:05 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Iron,Total 6900 rrg/kg 4.3 0.78 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:05 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Lead,Total 2.8 J kg LL 4.3 0.23 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:05 EPA 30508 1,6010C MC lagnesium,Total 1200 mg/kg 8.6 1.3 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:05 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Manganese,Total 100 mg/kg 0.86 0.14 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:05 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Mercury,Total ND mg/kg 0.07 0.02 1 12/16/16 09:0012117/16 19:25 EPA 7471 B 1,7471 B BV Nickel,Total _4.0 mg/kg 2.2 0.21 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:05 EPA 3050B___ 1,6010C MC Potassium,Total 720 mg/kg 220 12. 2 92/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:05 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Selenium,Total _ND ----mg/kg 1.7 0.22 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02.05 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Silver,Total ND, mg/kg 0.86 0.24 2 12/16/16 20:0012120/16 02:05 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Sodium,Total 35 J mg/kg 170 _ 2.7 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:05 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Thallium,Total ND mg/kg - 1.7 0.27 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:05 EPA 3050B 1,6010C MC Vanadium,Total 11 mg/kg 0.86 _0.18 2 12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02:05 EPA 3050B 1,60100 MC Zinc,Total 13 _ mg/kg 4.3 _ 0.25 2 _12/16/16 20:0012/20/16 02.05 EPA 3050B 1,60100- _MC Zirconium,Total 0.35 J mg/kg - 1.7 _0.21 10 12/20/16 20:1612/23/16 15:15 EPA 3050B 1,6020A - TT ZlALL Page 13 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 Method Blank Analysis Batch Quality Control f Dilution Date Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst __ _.._-._�..__-._ _-_�____..-.,_._�...___- _ -B ._ -______ ___ Total Metals.-Mansfield Lab for sample(s):'01-013_Batch: ;WG961859-1 Mercury,Total ND mg/kg 0.08 0.02 1 12/16/16 09:00 12/17/16 18:38 1,7471B BV Prep Information Digestion Method: EPA 7471 B Dilution Date Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units, RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst Total Metals-Mansfield Lab for�sample(s) Aluminum,Total ND mg/kg 4.0 1.1 1 12/16/16 20:00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC Antimony,Total ND mg/kg 2.0 0.15 1 12/16/16 20.00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC Arsenic,Total ND mg/kg 0.40 0.08 1 12/16/16 20:00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC Barium,Total ND -mg/kg 0.40 0.07 1 12/16/16 20:00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC (ilium,Total ND mg/kg 0.20 0.01 1 12/16/16 20 00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC mium,Total ND mg/kg 0.40 0.04 1 12/16/16 20:00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC Calcium,Total ND mg/kg 4.0 1.4 1 12/16/16 20:00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC Chromium,Total ND mg/kg 0.40 0.04 1 12/16/16 20:00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC Cobalt,Total ND mg/kg 0.80 - 0.07 1 12/16/16 20:00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC ---- - - ---- ---- ---- ---------- --------- -------- ------ - ---- - - Copper,Total ND mg/kg 0.40 0.10 1 12/16/16 20:00 12/19/1622:41 1,6010C MC Iron,Total 1.1 J mg/kg 2.0 0.36 1 12/16/16 20.00 12/19/1622:41 1,6010C MC Lead,Total ND mg/kg 2.0 0.11 1 12/16/16 20:00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC Magnesium,Total ND mg/kg 4.0 0.62 1 12/16/16 20:00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC Manganese,Total ND mg/kg 0.40 0.06 1 12/16/16 20:00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC ---- --------- ------------------- ------ - Nickel,Total ND mg/kg 1.0 0.10 1 12/16/16 20:00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC ------- --- - ------ - ---- ------- ------ - Potassium,Total ND mg/kg 100 5.8 1 12/16/16 20.00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC Selenium,Total ND mg/kg 0.80 0.10 1 12/16/16 20:00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC Silver,Total ND _- mg/kg _ 0.40 0.11 1 _12/16/16 20:00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC Sodium,Total ND mg/kg 80 1.3 1 12/16/16 20:00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC Thallium,Total ND mg/kg 0.80 0.13 1 12/16/16 20:00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC Vanadium,Total ND T mg/kg 0.40 0.08 1 12/16/16 20:00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC ------ ------- --------- --- ------------- ------ Zinc,Total ND mg/kg 2.0 0.12 1 12/16/16 20:00 12/19/16 22:41 1,6010C MC �vL HA Page 14 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 Method Blank Analysis Batch Quality Control Prep Information Digestion Method: EPA 30506 Dilution Date Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst Total Metals-Mansfield Lab for sample(s): 01_-08, Batch:WG963175-1�4T~ _ Zirconium,Total 0.86 J mg/kg 1.6 0.19 10 12/20/16 20:16 12/23/16 14:04 1,6020A TT Prep Information Digestion Method: EPA 30506 Page 15 of 60 Serial No:016617 l Lab Control Sample Analysis Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Batch Quality Control) Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 LCS LCSD %Recovery Parameter %Recovery Qual %Recovery Qual Limits RPD Qual RPD Limits TotalMetals-,Mansfeld Lab'Associated sample(s):01=08 Batch:WG961859-2 SRM Lot Number:D091-540 Mercury,Total �- 914 - 72-128 - Page 16 of 60 ti� �w.A Serial No:010617 Lab Control Sample Analysis Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Batch Quality Control Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 LCS LCSD %Recovery Parameter %Recovery %Recovery Limits RPD RPD Limits Total Metals-_Mansfeld LLab Associated4sample(s)�01-08` _BatchyWG962161-2 ^SRM Lot Number: Aluminum,Total 69 - - 52-148 - Antimony,Total - — --�-122 '� - 1-200 - Arsenic,Total 90 - 8 0-12 1 - Barium,Total j 86 ; - 84117 - Beryllium,Total 85-' - 83-117 - Cadmium,Total +86- - 83-117 - Calcium,Total 84 --_7 - 81-118 Chromium,Total { 84 --1 - 80-119 - Cobalt,Total 91 - 84115 - Copper,Total 'T 87' - { - 82-117 - Iron,Total iP� 80 -, - 47-154 - Lead,Total - 96--! - 82-118 - Magnesium,Total 80 - 77-123 - Manganese,Total 87 - - 82-118 - -- Nickel,Total 85^ - 83-117 Potassium,Total 104--- --- - - ---- --- 72-128 - -- -- Selenium,Total f 8-4 - 79-121 - Silver,Total ---- - - ( --BS- f -- ----- -- - 75_124----- ---- - - -- - -- - ---— Sodium,Total 86 -- - 73-126 - Thallium,Total 135 -1-� - 80`121 - - - I - - --- -- --- -- - - Vanadiumum,,Total 81 ' 78-122 A Page 17 of 60 Serial No:010617 G Lab Control Sample Analysis Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Batch Quality Control Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 LCS LCSD %Recovery Parameter %Recovery %Recovery Limits RPD RPD Limits Total Metals-Mansfield Lab Associated sample(s):01-08 Batch: 6-WW2161-2 SRM Lot Numbar: D091-540 Zinc,Total - ----- — ——��88—� ---- ---— -- 82_118 - - -- - Total Metals—Mansfield Lab-Associated samples) 01-08 .Batch:WG963175-:� A� Zirconium,Total --------- — 1U ---- --- --- 82-118 ------------ 20 --- — Page 18 of 60 �� F;,� Serial No:01061 i -I Matrix Spike Analysis Batch Quality Control Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 Native MS MS MS MSD MSD Recovery RPD Parameter Sample Added Found %Recovery Qual Found /,Recovery Qual Limits RPD Qual Limits Total Metals=9a—hs eld-'Lab*Associated sample(s): 01--O--8' QC.Batch ID WG961859-3^ QC—Sample':--L6-408-1 1 Client ID: MS Sample Mercury,Total ND 0.154 0.17 —116-1 - - 80-120 - 20 1 " Page 19 of 60 ` Serial No:010617 4 Matrix Spike Analysis Project Name: FISHERS IS. WASTE MANAGEMENT Batch Quality Control Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 Native MS MS MS MSD MSD Recovery RPD Parameter Sample Added Found %Recovery Found /,Recovery Limits RPD Limits Totl Metals-Mansfield Lab Associated sample(s): 01-08 QC Batch ID`WG962161=3,M QC Sample: L1640950-01 T Client IDS-1,(00.5) Y. Aluminum,Total 8200 -- 196 9400 619 Q - - 75-125 - 20 - ^Y. m -� - - --------- - Antimony,Total 0.54J 49.1 42 86- '� - - 75-125 - 20 Arsenic,Total 1.6 11.8- 14 g 105 - - 75-125 - 20 Barium,Total 25. 196 210 j 94 ' - - 75-125 - 20 Beryllium,Total 0.31J 4.91 4.9 �^-100 - - 75-125 - 20 Cadmium,Total ND 5 4.9 _ 98 - - 75-125 - 20 Calcium,Total 630 982 1600 F-99 - - 75-125 - 20 Chromium,Total 6.9 19.6 24 87 l - - 75-125 - 20 Cobalt,Total 2.8 49.1 48 921 - - 75-125 20 Copper,Total 7.7 24.5 32 C 99--�� - - 75-125 - 20 Iron,Total 8900 98.2 9700 !- 815 Q - - 75-125 - 20 Lead,Total 16. 50 66 100 - - -- --- --- -- -- - - ------75-125 - - ---- - - Magnesium,Total 1300 982 2000' 71 Q 75-125 - 20 Manganese,Total 140 49.1 180 82 - - 75-125 - 20 Nickel,Total 4.6 49.1 49 �_ 90 � - - 75-125 - 20 Potassium,Total 580 982 1300 73 Q - - 75-125 - -- — 20 Selenium,Total ND 11.8 12 ( -102 - - 75-125 - - -20 Silver,Totalr - - ND 29.4 29 98�-? 75-125 - 20 Sodium,Total - - - 49.J 982 960 - 98._ - - 75-125 - 20 Thallium,Total ND 11.8 11 93' - - - 75-125 - - -— 20 Vanadium,Total ----_ -_-- 14. -- 49.1 - 62 -98�j - - — --- 75-125- -- - 20 Page 20 of 60 2d� HA Serial No:010617 _ =G Matrix Spike Analysis Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Batch Quality Control Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 Native MS MS MS MSD MSD Recovery RPD Parameter Sample Added Found %Recovery Found %Recovery Limits ' RPD Limits Total Metals Mansfield Lab Associatedwsample(s), 0108 QC Batch ID:WG962161-3 �QC Sample:L1'640950-01 Zinc,Total 26. 49.1 71 -92 - _ - 75-125 -. 20 Total Metals-_9as fi e I_dLab Associated sample(s): 01-08 QC Batch ID:WG963175-3 QC Sample: L1640950-01 Client ID: S-1 (0-0.5) � Zirconium,Total 1.7J 4.94 1.4 28 ~� Q - - 75-125 - 20 Page 21 of 60 Serial No:010617 .l Lab Duplicate Analysis Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Batch Quality Control Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date:_ 01/06/17 Parameter Native Sample Duplicate Sample Units . RPD Qual RPD Limits Total Metals- Mansfeld Lab Associated sample(s): .01-08 QC Batch ID: WG961.859-4. QC Sample:.11640841-01 Client ID: bbP Sample Mercury,Total ND ND mg%kg NC 20 C HA Page 22 of 60 Serial No:010617 I Lab Duplicate Analysis Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Batch Quality Control Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 Parameter Native Sample Duplicate Sample Units RPD RPD Limits Total Metals-,Mansfield Lab Associated sam O:01-08 QC,Batch ID- WG962161-4 QC Sample_ L1640950-014 Client ID: S-1 (0-0.5)1-- � Aluminum,Total 8200 9500 mg/kg P'95 ] 20 Antimony,Total 0.54.1 0.40J mg/kg NC 20 Arsenic,Total 1.6 _ 1.8 mg/kg 12 20 Barium,Total 25. 24 mg/kg 4 1 20 Beryllium,Total 0.31J 0.36J mg/kg -vNCO 20 Cadmium,Total ND ND mg/kg NC 20 .__. Calcium,Total 630— 530 mg/kg 17 —s 20 Chromium,Total 6.9 7.1 mg/kg �_..3 20 - -------- -- ----- - - - - - - Cobalt,Total 2.8 2.5 mg/kg (r ^19`— 20 Copper,Total 7.7 6.7 mg/kg 14- 20 Iron,Total 8900 9900 mg/kg -11 20 = - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - -- - -- - - - ---- _. ---------- -- Lead, Lead,Total 16. 19 mg/kg 7—i 20 Magnesium,Total 1300 1100 mg/kg r 1i4..-_i -- 20 --- Manganese,Total 140 120 mg/kg 75- 20 Nickel,Total 4.6 4.4 mg/kg F 4-' 20 -------------- - --- - - ---------- ----- ----- —- ------- Potassium,Total 580 320 mg/kg 58 Q 20 Selenium,Total ND ND mg/kg NC--I 20 k Silver,Total ND' ND - mg/kg 20 Sodium,Total 49.J 45J mg/kgj= NC V 20 HA Page 23 of 60 �L Serial No:010617 _I Lab Duplicate Analysis Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Batch Quality Control Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 Parameter Native Sample Duplicate Sample Units RPD RPD Limits I otal Metals- Mansfield Lab Associated sample(s): 0108 -QC Batch.ID:-WG962161-4 QC Sample: L1640950-01 Client ID: S=1 (0-0.5)---- Thallium, 0-0.5)-- -Thallium,Total ND ND mg/kg e"~NC 20 L.�._ Vanadium,Tota[ 14. 16 mg/kg � 13;i 20 Zinc,Total 26. 27 mg/kg 4? 20 Total Metals,- Mansfield Lab Associated sample(s)-., 01-08�QC Batch ID:,WG963175-4 QC Sample: L1640950-01 Client ID:- S-1 (0-0.5)y Zirconium,Total 1.7J 1.4J mg/kg SNC 20 f�L�L HA Page 24 of 60 �. .. Serial No:01061717:14 INORGANICS MISCELLANEOUS Page 25 of 60 Serial_No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW,1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 SAMPLE RESULTS Lab ID: L1640950-01 Date Collected: 12/13/16 09:10 f Client ID: S-1 (0-0.5j Date Received: 12/15/16 Sample Location:' FISHERS ISLAND,NY Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil Dilution Date Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst General Chemistry-Westborough Lab Solids,Total 80.6 % 0,100 NA 1 - 12/21/16 01.57 121,2540G VB _ c 44PHA Page 26 of 60 ° Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 SAMPLE RESULTS Lab ID: L1640950-02 Date Collected: 12/13/16 11:20 Client ID: S-2(4-6) Date Received: 12/15/16 Sample Location: FISHERS ISLAND,NY Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil Dilution Date Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst General Chemistry`Westborough Lab Solids,Total 90.2 % 0.100 NA 1 - 12/21/16 01:57 121,2540G VB I /'%L'� sHA Page 27 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 SAMPLE RESULTS Lab ID: L1640950-03 Date Collected: 12/13/16 11:40 Client ID: S-3(0-0.5) Date Received: 12/15/16 Sample Location: FISHERS ISLAND,NY Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil Dilution Date Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst General Chemistry-WestboroughLab L _ ___ Solids,Total 90.5 % 0.100 NA 1 - 12/21/16 01:57 121,2540G VB l APHA Page 28 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 SAMPLE RESULTS i Lab ID: L1640950-04 Date Collected: 12/13/16 12:20 Client ID: S-4(0-0.5) Date Received: 12/15/16 Sample Location: FISHERS ISLAND,NY Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil Dilution Date Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst General Chemistry Solids,Total 87.6 % 0.100 NA 1 - 12/21/1601:57 121,2540G VB �/L1L'?NA Page 29 of 60 a Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: - 01/06/17 SAMPLE RESULTS Lab ID: L1640950-05 Date Collected: 12/13/16 15:00 Client ID: S-5(2-4) Date Received: 12/15/16 Sample Location: FISHERS ISLAND,NY Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil Dilution Date Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst General Chemistry-Westborough Lab_ _'__�—____ __�_—_ -- Solids,Total 90.9 % 0.100 NA 1 - 12/21/16 01:57 121,2540G VB !ILPHA Page 30 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number:, FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 SAMPLE RESULTS Lab ID: L1640950-06 Date Collected: 12/14/16 08:30 Client ID: S-6(0-0.5) Date Received: 12/15/16 Sample Location: FISHERS ISLAND,NY Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil Dilution Date Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst General Chemistry-Westborough_La_b Solids,Total 68.5 % 0.100 NA 1 - 12/21/16 01:57 121,2540G VB �L,L`PHA Page 31 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 SAMPLE RESULTS Lab ID: L1640950-07 Date Collected: 12/14/16 09:15 Client ID: S-7(0-0.5) Date Received: 12/15/16 Sample Location: FISHERS ISLAND,NY Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil Dilution Date Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst General Chemistry_ Westborough Lab _ , Solids,Total �- 85.3 % 0.100 NA 1 - 12/21/16 01:57 121,2540G VB ��L1L`?HA Page 32 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 SAMPLE RESULTS Lab ID: L1640950-08 Date Collected: 12/13/16 11:00 Client ID: S-8(2-4) Date Received: 12/15/16 Sample Location: FISHERS ISLAND,NY Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil Dilution Date Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst General Chemistry_Westborough Solids,Total 91.5 % 0.100 NA 1 - 12/21/16 01:57 121,2540G VB Page 33 of 60 Serial No:010617 I Lab Duplicate Analysis Project Name: FISHERS IS. WASTE MANAGEMENT Batch Quality Control Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 Parameter Native Sample Duplicate Sample Units RPD Qual RPD Limits General Chemistry-Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 01-08 QC Batch ID: WG963234-1 QC Sample: L1641482-01 Client ID: DUP Sample Solids,Total 78.8 78.8 % 0 20 Page 34 of 60 fJ� l,a Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 Sample Receipt and Container Information Were project specific reporting limits specified? YES Cooler Information Custody Seal Cooler A Absent Container Information Temp Container ID Container Type Cooler pH deg C Pres Seal Analysis(*) L1640950-01A Glass 120mU4oz unpreserved A N/A 2.8 Y Absent BE-TI(180),AS-TI(180),BA- TI(180),AG-TI(180),AL- TI(180),CR-TI(180),NI- TI(180),TL-TI(180),TS(7),CU- T I(180),P B-T I(180),S B- TI(180),SE-TI(180),ZN- TI(180),CO-TI(180),V- TI(180),FE-TI(180),HG- T(28),MG-TI(180),MN- TI(180),CA-TI(180),CD- T I(180),K-T I(180),NA- TI(180),ZR-6020T(l 80) L1640950-01B Glass 120rnU4oz unpreserved A N/A 2.8 Y Absent SUB-EXPLOSIVES() i L1640950-02A Glass 120rnU4oz unpreserved A N/A 2.8 Y Absent BE-TI(180),AS-TI(180),BA- TI(180),AG-TI(180),AL- T I(18 0),C R-T I(180),N I- TI(180),TL-TI(180),TS(7),CU- TI(180),PB-TI(180),SB- TI(180),SE-Tl(180),ZN- TI(180),CO-TI(180),V- TI(180),FE-TI(180),HG- T(28),M G-T I(180),M N- TI(180),CA-TI(180),CD- TI(180),K-TI(180),NA- TI(180),ZR-6020T(180) L1640950-02B Glass 120rnV4oz unpreserved A N/A 2.8 Y Absent SUB-EXPLOSIVES() L1640950-03A Glass 120rnV4oz unpreserved A N/A 2.8 Y Absent BE-TI(180),AS-TI(180),BA- TI(180),AG-TI(180),AL- TI(180),CR-TI(180),NI- TI(180),TL-TI(180),TS(7),CU- TI(180),PB-TI(180),SB- TI(180),SE-TI(180),ZN- T I(180),C O-T I(180),V- TI(180),FE-TI(180),HG- T(28),M G-T I(180),M N- TI(180),CA-TI(180),CD- TI(180),K-TI(180),NA- TI(180),ZR-6020T(180) L1640950-03B Glass 120m1/4oz unpreserved A N/A 2.8 Y Absent SUB-EXPLOSIVES() *Values in parentheses indicate holding time in days %%ALPHA Page 35 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L164095O Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 - Container Information Temp Container ID Container Type Cooler pH deg C Pres Seal Analysis(*) L1640950-04A Glass 120rnY4oz unpreserved A N/A 2.8 Y Absent BE-TI(180),AS-TI(180),BA- TI(180),AG-TI(180),AL- T I(180),C R-T I(18 0),N I- TI(180),TL-T I(180),TS(7),CU- TI(180),PB-TI(180),SB- TI(180),SE-TI(180),ZN- TI(180),CO-TI(180),V- TI(180),FE-TI(180),HG- T(28),MG-TI(180),MN- TI(180),CA-TI(180),CD- TI(180),K-TI(180),NA- TI(180),ZR-6020T(180) L1640950-04B Glass 120mMoz unpreserved A N/A 2.8 Y Absent SUB-EXPLOSIVES() L1640950-05A Glass 120mNoz unpreserved A N/A 2.8 Y Absent BE-TI(180),AS-TI(180),BA- TI(180),AG-TI(180),AL- TI(180),CR-TI(180),N I- TI(180),TL-TI(180),TS(7),CU- TI(180),PB-TI(180),SB- TI(180),SE-TI(180),ZN- TI(180),CO-TI(180),V- TI(180),FE-TI(180),H G- T(28),MG-TI(180),MN- TI(180),CA-TI(180),CD- TI(180),K-TI(180),NA- T I(180),ZR-6020T(180) L1640950-05B Glass 120mMoz unpreserved A N/A 2.8 Y Absent SUB-EXPLOSIVES() L1640950-06A Glass 120mV4oz unpreserved A N/A 2.8 Y Absent BE-TI(180),AS-TI(180),BA- TI(180),AG-TI(180),AL- TI(180),CR-TI(180),N I- TI(180),TL-TI(180),TS(7),CU- TI(180),PB-TI(180),SB- Tl(180),SE-TI(180),ZN- TI(180),CO-TI(180),V- TI(180),FE-TI(180),HG- T(28),M G-Tl(180),M N- TI(180),CA-TI(180),CD- T I(180),K-T I(180),NA- TI(180),ZR-6020T(180) L1640950-06B Glass 120mMoz unpreserved A N/A 2.8 Y Absent SUB-EXPLOSIVES() L1640950-07A Glass 120mV4oz unpreserved A N/A 2.8 Y Absent BE-TI(180),AS-TI(180),BA- TI(180),AG-TI(180),AL- TI(180),CR-TI(180),N I- TI(180),TL-TI(180),TS(7),CU- TI(180),PB-TI(180),SB- TI(180),SE-TI(180),ZN- TI(180),CO-TI(180),V- TI(180),FE-TI(180),HG- T(28),M G-TI(180),M N- TI(180),CA-TI(180),CD- T I(180),K-TI(18 0),NA- TI(180),ZR-6020T(180) L1640950-07B Glass 120rnY4oz unpreserved - A N/A 2.8 Y Absent SUB-EXPLOSIVES() *Values in parentheses indicate holding time in days tia Page 36 of 60 Serial No:O1O61717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L164095O Project Number: FIW16O1 Report Date: 01/06/17 Container Information Temp Container ID Container Type Cooler pH deg C Pres Seal Analysis(*) L1640950-08A Glass 120ml/4oz unpreserved A N/A 2.8 Y Absent BE-TI(180),AS-TI(180),BA- TI(180),AG-TI(180),AL- TI(180),CR-TI(180),NI- TI(180),TL-TI(180),TS(7),CU- TI(180),PB-TI(180),SB- TI(180),SE-TI(180),ZN- TI(180),CO-TI(180),V- TI(180),FE-TI(180),HG- T(28),M G-Tl(18 0),M N- TI(180),CA-TI(180),CD- TI(180),K-TI(180),NA- TI(180),ZR-6020T(180) ' L1640950-08B Glass 120rnMoz unpreserved A N/A 2.8 Y Absent SUB-EXPLOSIVES() *Values in parentheses indicate holding time in days ��;,� Page 37 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 GLOSSARY Acronyms EDL Estimated Detection Limit-This value represents the level to which target analyte concentrations are reported as estimated values,when those target analyte concentrations are quantified below the reporting limit(RL).The EDL includes any adjustments from dilutions,concentrations or moisture content,where applicable.The use of EDLs is specific to the analysis of PAHs using Sohd-Phase Microextraction(SPME) EPA Environmental Protection Agency. LCS Laboratory Control Sample:A sample matrix,free from the analytes of interest,spiked with verified known amounts of analytes or a material containing known and verified amounts of analytes. LCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate:Refer to LCS. LFI Laboratory Fortified Blank-A sample matrix,free from the analytes of interest,spiked with verified known amounts of analytes or a material containing known and verified amounts of analytes. MDL Method Detection Limit:This value represents the level to which target analyte concentrations are reported as estimated values,when those target analyte concentrations are quantified below the reporting limit(RL).The MDL includes any adjustments from dilutions,concentrations or moisture content,where applicable. MS Matrix Spike Sample:A sample prepared by adding a known mass of target analyte to a specified amount of matrix sample for which an independent estimate of target analyte concentration is available. MSD Matrix Spike Sample Duplicate Refer to MS NA Not Applicable. NC Not Calculated- Term is utilized when one or more of the results utilized in the calculation are non-detect at the parameter's reporting unit. NDPA/DPA -N-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine. NI Not Ignitable. NP Non-Plastic:Term is utilized for the analysis of Atterberg Limits in soil. RL Reporting Limit: The value at which an instrument can accurately measure an analyte at a specific concentration The RL includes any adjustments from dilutions,concentrations or moisture content,where applicable. RPD Relative Percent Difference: The results from matrix and/or matrix spike duplicates are primarily designed to assess the precision of analytical results in a given matrix and are expressed as relative percent difference(RPD). Values which are less than five times the reporting limit for any individual parameter are evaluated by utilizing the absolute difference between the values;although the RPD value will be provided in the report. SRM Standard Reference Material.A reference sample of a known or certified value that is of the same or smular matrix as the associated field samples. STLP Semi-dynamic Tank Leaching Procedure per EPA Method 1315 TIC Tentatively Identified Compound:A compound that has been identified to be present and is not part of the target compound list(TCL)for the method and/or program.All TICs are qualitatively identified and reported as estimated concentrations. Footnotes 1 The reference for this analyte should be considered modified since this analyte is absent from the target analyte list of the original method. Terms Total With respect to Organic analyses,a'Total'result is defined as the summation of results for individual isomers or Aroclors.If a'Total' result is requested,the results of its individual components will also be reported.This is applicable to'Total'results for methods 8260,8081 and 8082 Analytical Method:Both the document from which the method originates and the analytical reference method (Example:EPA 8260B is shown as 1,8260B.)The codes for the reference method documents are provided in the References section of the Addendum. Data Qualifiers A Spectra identified as"Aldol Condensation Product". B The analyte was detected above the reporting limit in the associated method blank.Flag only applies to associated field samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte at less than ten times(10x)the concentration found in the blank For MCP-related projects,flag only applies to associated field samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte at less than ten times(10x) the concentration found in the blank.For DOD-related projects,flag only applies to associated field samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte at less than ten times(10x)the concentration found in the blank AND the analyte was detected above one-half the reporting limit(or above the reporting limit for common lab contaminants)in the associated method blank.For NJ- Air-related projects,flag only applies to associated field samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte above the reporting limit For NJ-related projects(excluding Air),flag only applies to associated field samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte,which was detected above the reporting limit in the associated method blank or above five times the Report Format: DU Report with'J'Qualifiers E LPHA Page 38 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 Data Qualifiers reporting limit for common lab contaminants(Phthalates,Acetone,Methylene Chloride,2-Butanone). C Co-elution:The target analyte co-elutes with a known lab standard(i.e.surrogate,internal standards,etc.)for co-extracted analyses. D Concentration of analyte was quantified from diluted analysis.Flag only applies to field samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte. E Concentration of analyte exceeds the range of the calibration curve and/or lmear range of the instrument. G The concentration may be biased high due to matrix interferences(i.e,co-elution)with non-target compound(s).The result should be considered estimated H The analysis of pH was performed beyond the regulatory-required holding time of 15 minutes from the time of sample collection. I The lower value for the two columns has been reported due to obvious interference. M Reporting Limit(RL)exceeds the MCP CAM Reporting Limit for this analyte. NJ Presumptive evidence of compound.This represents an estimated concentration for Tentatively Identified Compounds(TICS),where the identification is based on a mass spectral library search. P -The RPD between the results for the two columns exceeds the method-specified criteria. Q The quality control sample exceeds the associated acceptance criteria.For DOD-related projects,LCS and/or Continuing Calibration Standard exceedences are also qualified on all associated sample results. Note:This flag is not applicable for matrix spike recoveries when the sample concentration is greater than 4x the spike added or for batch duplicate RPD when the sample concentrations are less than 5x the RL.(Metals only.) R Analytical results are from sample re-analysis. RE Analytical results are from sample re-extraction. S Analytical results are from modified screening analysis. J Estimated value.The Target analyte concentration is below the quantitation limit(RL),but above the Method Detection Limit (MDL)or Estimated Detection Limit(EDL)for SPME-related analyses.This represents an estimated concentration for Tentatively Identified Compounds(TICS) ND -Not detected at the method detection limit(MDL)for the sample,or estimated detection limit(EDL)for SPMF related analyses. ReportFormat DU Report with V Qualifiers H A Page 39 of 60 Serial No:01061717:14 Project Name: FISHERS IS.WASTE MANAGEMENT Lab Number: L1640950 Project Number: FIW1601 Report Date: 01/06/17 REFERENCES 1 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods. EPA SW-846. Third Edition. Updates I-IV,2007. 121 Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater.APHA-AWWA-WEF. Standard Methods Online. r LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES Alpha Analytical performs services with reasonable care and diligence normal to the analytical testing laboratory industry. In the event of an error,the sole and exclusive responsibility of Alpha Analytical shall be to re-perform the work at it's own expense. In no event shall Alpha Analytical be held liable for any incidental, consequential or special damages, including but not limited to, damages in any way connected with the use of, interpretation of, information or analysis provided by Alpha Analytical. We strongly urge our clients to comply with EPA protocol regarding sample volume, preservation, cooling, containers,sampling procedures, holding time and splitting of samples in the field. Page 40 of 60 Serial_No:01061717:14 Alpha Analytical, Inc. ID No.:17873 Facility: Company-wide Revision 7 Department: Quality Assurance Published Date: 8/5/2016 11:25:56 AM Title: Certificate/Approval Program Summary Page 1 of 1 Certification Information The following analytes are not Included in our Primary NELAP Scope of Accreditation: Westborough Facility EPA 624: m/p-xylene,o-xylene EPA 8260C: NPW.1,2,4,5-Tetramethylbenzene;4-Ethyitoluene,Azobenzene,SCM: lodomethane(methyl Iodide), Methyl methacrylate,124,5- Tetramethylbenzene,4-Ethyltoluene. EPA 8270D: NPW:Dimethylnaphthalene,1,4-Diphenylhydrazine,SCM Dimethylnaphthalene,1,4-Diphenylhydrazine EPA 300: DW-Bromide EPA 6860: NPW and SCM: Perchlorate EPA 9010: NPW and SCM- Amenable Cyanide Distillation EPA 90128 NPW Total Cyanide EPA 9050A• NPW Specific Conductance SM3500. NPW: Ferrous Iron SM4500•NPW. Amenable Cyanide, Dissolved Oxygen;SCM:Total Phosphorus,TKN,NO2,NO3. SM5310C DW Dissolved Organic Carbon Mansfield Facility SM 2540D: TSS EPA 3005A NPW EPA8082A• NPW- PCB-1,5,31,87,101,110,141,151,153,180,183,187. EPA TO-15• Halothane,2,4,4-Trimethyl-2-pentene,2,4,4-Trimethyl-1-pentene,Thlophene,2-Methylthiophene, 3-Methylthlophene,2-Ethylthiophene,1,2,3-Trim ethyl benzene, Indan, Indene,1,2,4,5-Tetramethylbenzene, Benzothlophene,1-Methylnaphthalene Biological Tissue Matrix- EPA 3050B The following analytes are Included in our Massachusetts DEP Scope of Accreditation Westborough Facility- Drinking acilityDrinking Water EPA 300.0:Nitrate-N,Fluoride,Sulfate; EPA 353.2: Nitrate-N,Nitrite-N,SM4500NO3-F• Nitrate-N,Nitrite-N;SM4500F-C,SM4500CN-CE, EPA 180 1, SM2130B,SM4500CI-D,SM232013,SM2540C,SM450OH-B EPA 332: Perchlorate, EPA 524 2• THMs and VOCs; EPA 504.1: EDB, DBCP. Microbiology:SM921513;SM9223-PIA,SM9223B-Colilert-QT,SM9222D. Non-Potable Water SM4500H,B, EPA 120 1,SM2510B,SM2540C,SM2320B,SM4500CL-E,SM4500F-BC,SM4500NH3-BH, EPA 350.1:Ammonia-N, LACHAT 10-107- 06-1-6 Ammonia-N,SM4500NO3-F, EPA 353 2:Nitrate-N, EPA 351.1,SM4500P-E,SM4500P-B, E,SM4500SO4-E,SM5220D, EPA 410 4, SM5210B,SM5310C,SM4500CL-D, EPA 1664, EPA 420 1,SM4500-CN-CE,SM2540D EPA 624:Volatile Halocarbons&Aromatics, EPA 608:Chlordane,Toxaphene,Aldrin,alpha-BHC,beta-BHC,gamma-BHC,delta-BHC, Dieldrin, DDD, DDE,DDT, Endosulfan I,Endosulfan ll, Endosulfan sulfate, Endrin, Endrin Aldehyde, Heptachlor,Heptachlor Epoxide, PCBs EPA 625:SVOC(Acid/Base/Neutral Extractables), EPA 600/4-81-045: PCB-Oil, Microbiology SM9223B-Colilert-QT, Enterolert-QT,SM9222D-MF. Mansfield Facility- Drinking acilityDrinking Water EPA 200 7 Ba,Be,Cd,Cr,Cu,Ni,Na,Ca EPA 200 8 Sb,As,Ba,Be,Cd,Cr,Cu, Pb,Ni,Se,TL EPA 245 1 Hg Non-Potable Water EPA 200.7:Al,Sb,As,Be,Cd,Ca,Cr,Co,Cu, Fe,Pb,Mg,Mn,Mo,Ni, K,Se,Ag,Na,Sr,TL,Ti,V,Zn EPA 200.8.Al,Sb,As,Be,Cd,Cr,Cu,Pb,Mn,Ni,Se,Ag,TL,Zn. EPA 245.1 Hg SM2340B For a complete listing of analytes and methods,please contact your Alpha Project Manager. Document Type: Form Pre-Qualtrax Document ID: 08-113 Page 41 of 60 Serial_No:0106171 SUB UPS: ALS-PA t CHAIN OF CUSTODYPAGE 1 OF 1 Date Rec'd in Lab: _ ALPHA Job#:1_1640950 r-- NAUTICAL ❑ FAX ❑ EMAIL ❑ Same as Client info I PO#: Westborough,MA Mansfield,MA Project Name: Add'I Deliverables TEL 508-898-9220 TEL'508.822-9300 ❑ ADEX ❑ FAX.508-898-9193 FAX 508.622-3288 Regulatory Requirements/Report Limits r InformationClient Project Location:NY State/Fed Program Catena + t Client:Alpha Analytical Lab ProjectNITA 1111110:1 V*311110#: • - • • • s • --• • • Address:8 Walkup Drive Project Manager:Ethan Leighton ❑ Yes ❑ No Are MCP Analytical Methods Required? Westborough,Ma 01581 ALPHA Quote#: 0 Yes ❑ No Are CT RCP Reasonable Confidence ProtocolsI Required? Phone:508-898-9220 Turn-Around Time ANALYSIS SAMPLE HANDLING Fax, X Standard ❑Rush(ONLY IF PRE-APPROVED) Filtration ❑ Done Email: subreports@alphalab.com ❑ Not Needed ❑These samples have been Previously analyzed by Alpha Due Date:Time: - ❑ Lab to do on Other Project Specific Requirements/Comments/Detection Limits: 0 Lab to do Needs NY ASP-B Deliverables,See quote 553066 ab to d (Please specify Please reference Alpha•Job#1_1640950 on this report. below) Report to include Method Blank, LCS and LCSD. U) U) ALPHA Lab ID Sample ID 'Collection Sample Sampler's o. (Lab Use Only), Date Time Matrix Initials W Comments ommSpecific me5pecl coments S-1 (0-0.5) 12/13/16 09.10 Soil ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ S-2(4-6) 12/13/16 11:20 SOI) 10 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ t S-3(0-0.5) 12/13/16 11.40 Soil ® El El El 07T ❑ ❑ 1 El El El El ❑ _ - S-4(0-0.5), 12113/16 1220 Soil ® ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ t S-5(2-4) 12/13116 15'00 SOI) ® ❑ El E] E] ET El El El I] ❑ ❑ 1 S-6(0-0.5) 12/14/16 08.30 Soil ® El El ❑ ❑ —0— ❑ El1:1 ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 �. 8-7(0-0.5) 12114/16 09.15 Soil M ❑ El Ll El El ET—EF ❑ ❑ ❑ r ` S-8(2-4) 12/14/16 1100 Soil ® ❑ ET ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 1:11 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ PLEASE ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOVEI Container Type G Please pont clearly.legibly Preservative A andcompletely. SamDlescan not ba logged in mrd � S YOUR PROJECT Relinquished By. Daterrime Received By, Date/Time turnaround'hme clock vAll not start unlit any ambiguities are- resolved All samples MA MCP or CT RCP? submitted'are subject to I Atphs's Payment Terms. FORM NO e10I(9 per 3ud0t-07) i Page 42 of 60 Serial_No:01061 T NEW YORK Service Centers Pae 4A CHAIN OF Mahwah,NJ 07430:35 Whitney Rd,Suite 5 8 Date Recd _ ALPHA Job# 1 Albany,NY 12205:14 Walker Way Of b!a �* CUSTODY Tonawanda,NY 14150.275 Cooper Ave,Suite 105 in O , . Westborough,MA 01581 Mansfield,MA 02046 •jbjct Information 8 Walkup Dr. 320 Forbes Blvd • • - • Deliverables TEL 508-898-9220 TEL*508-822-9300 Project Name: f-' @ L ,�, ❑ ASP-A ❑ ASP-B Same as Client Info FAX.508-898-9193 FAX 508.822-3288 Project Location: r ❑ EQuIS(1 File) ❑ EQuIS(4 File) Po# • • Project# d ❑ Other Client: ,� (Use Project name as Project#) ❑ Regulatory Requirement .. Information n Address: Project Manager: 1 c,, yr' ❑ NY TOGS ❑ NY Part375 Please identify below location of MCA IV /i ALPHAQuote#: ❑ AWQ Standards ❑ NY CP-51 applicable disposal facilities. ` ............................................................. Phone: - - • • - ❑ NY Restricted Use ❑ Other Disposal Facility: Fax- Standard lcL. Due Date: ❑ NY Unrestricted Use ❑ NJ ❑ NY Email' L _ ! Rush(only d pre approved)❑ #of Days: ❑ NYC Sewer Discharge ❑ Other. These sampl s have bee previously analyzed by Alpha ❑ ANALYSIS Sample Filtration Other project specific requirements/comments: f J ❑Done Lab to do Coe t iO� /1 J�•�'J/P Preservation Please specify Metals or TAL, .� .� E]Lab to do 01 �. (Please Specify below) - I ALPHA Lab ID Collection Sample Sampler's ` Sample ID Date Time Matrix Initials 1 (Lab Use Only) Sample Specific Comments I aqS$ o f - - 2 3 �� : o ell -a� Zt �c �c o _d -, S V l' 11 ov Preservative Code: Container Code Westboro.Certification No:MA935 A=None P=Plastic Container Type Please print clearly,legibly B=HCI A=Amber Glass Mansfield:Certification No:MA015 and completely.Samples can C=HNO3 v=vial not be logged in and D=112SO4 G=Glass Preservative E=NaOH B=Bacteria Cup �-' turnaround time clock will not I start until any ambiguities are F=McOH C=Cube qqu ed-By - - Date/Time Received By: Date/Time resolved.BY EXECUTING G=NaHSO4 O=Other - H=Na2S203 E=Encore �� tZ.{tl.( >�r � 1 �Z.�-r-�� THIS COC,THE CLIENT . K/E=Zn Ac/NaOH D=BOD Bottler - r r HAS READ AND AGREES A Q=Other / 1`2 1`� �1 }?{I � ,� TO BE BOUND BY ALPHA t % 'S �' G�� /r �l� TERMS&CONDITIONS. Form No:01-25 HC(rev.30-Sept-2013) (See reverse side.) Page 43 of 60 Serial_No:0106 14 ALS Enuironmental-- , � w a14 Oogwood,Ltne ■Middletown,PA 17057 ■ Phone:717-944-SSd 1 ■ Fax 7i7-94d-1430 ■ w+vw.alsglobal.cotn NELAP Certifications: NJ PA010,NY 11759,PA22-293 DoD ELAP: A2LA0818.01 State Certifications: DE ID 11 ,MA PA0102,MD 128,VA 460157,WV 343 January 6,2017 r Results Alpha Analytical 145 Flanders Road Westborough,MA 01581 Certificate of Analysis Project Name: 2016_-EXPLOSIVES 8330.NY SITE Workorder: 2196967 Purchase Order: Workorder ID'. ALP176IL1640950 Dear Results: Enclosed are the analytical results for samples received by the laboratory on Tuesday, December 20,2016. The ALS Environmental laboratory in Middletown, Pennsylvania is a National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP)accredited laboratory and as such, certifies that all applicable test results meet the requirements of NELAR If you have any questions regarding this certificate of analysis, please contact Ms. Shannon Butler(Project Coordinator)at(717)944-5541. Analyses were performed according to our laboratory's NELAP-approved quality assurance program and any applicable state requirements.The test results meet requirements of the current NELAP standards or state requirements,where applicable. For a specific list of accredited analytes, refer to the certifications section of the ALS website at www.aisgiobal.com/en/Our-Services/Life-Sciences/Environmental/Downloads. This laboratory report may not be reproduced, except in full,without the written approval of ALS Environmental. ALS Spring City: 10 Riverside Drive, Spring City, PA 19475 610-948-4903 This page is included as part of the Analytical Report and Ms.Shannon Butler must be retained as a permanent record thereof. Project Coordinator ALS Environmental Laboratory Locations Across North America Canada:Burlington•Calgary•Centre of Excellence•Edmonton -Fort McMurray•Fort St.John•Grande,Praine- London •Mississauga• Richmond Hill•Saskatoon•Thunder Bay Vancouver Waterloo•Winnipeg•Yellowknife United States:Cincinnati•Everett•Fort Collins•Holland'.Houston • Middletown•Salt Lake City•Spring City York Mexico:Monterrey Report ID:2196967-1/6/2017 Page 1 of 17 Page 44 of 60 Serial_No:0106 -14 ALS Enuironmental `,4.[�agWood Lane .Middletown,PA 17057 ■ Phone:717-944-5541 ■ Fax:717-944-1430 ■ WW,W.alSgIobal.co(,n NE LAP Certifications: NJ PA010,NY 11759,PA 22-293 DoD E LAP: A2LA 0818.01 S late Certifications: DE ID 11 ,MA PA0102,MD 128,VA 460157,WV 343 SAMPLE SUMMARY Workorder: 2196967 ALP176IL1640950 Lab ID Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received Collected By 2196967001 S-1 (0-0.5) Solid 12/13/2016 09:10 12/20/2016 10:24 Collected by Client 2196967002 S-2(4-6) Solid 12/13/2016 11:20 12/20/2016 10:24 Collected by Client 2196967003 S-3(0-0.5) Solid 12/13/2016 11:40 12/20/2016 10:24 Collected by Client 2196967004 S-4(0-0.5) Solid 12/13/201612:20 12/20/201610:24 Collected by Client 2196967005 S-5(2-4) Solid 12/13/2016 15:00 12/20/2016 10:24 Collected by Client 2196967006 S-6(0-0.5) Solid 12/14/2016 08:30 12/20/2016 10:24 Collected by Client 2196967007 S-7(0-0.5) Solid 12/14/2016 09:15 12/20/2016 10:24 Collected by Client 2196967008 S-8(2-4) Solid 12/14/2016 11:00 12/20/2016 10:24 Collected by Client t ALS Environmental Laboratory Locations Across North America Canada:Burlington•Calgary•Centre of Excellence•Edmonton•Fort McMurray• Fort St.John•Grande Prairie• London•Mississauga• Richmond Hill•Saskatoon•Thunder Bay Vancouver Waterloo•Winnipeg•Yellowknife United States:Cincinnati•Everett•Fort Collins•Holland•Houston•Middletown•Salt Lake City•Spring City•York Mexico:Monterrey Report ID:2196967-1/6/2017 Page 2 of 17 Page 45 of 60 Serial_No:0106 14 ,ALS Enulronmental 4 Dogwood'Lane :Middletown,PA 17057 ■ Phone:717-944-5541 ,i Fax:717-944-1430 ■ wnvw,alsglobal-com NE LAP Certifications: NJ PA010,NY 11759,PA 22-293 DoD E LAP- A2LA 0818.01' S tate Certifications: DE ID 11 ,MA PA0102,MD 128,VA 460157,WV 343 SAMPLE SUMMARY Workorder: 2196967 ALP176IL1640950 Notes — Samples collected by ALS personnel are done so in accordance with the procedures set forth in the ALS Field Sampling Plan(20- Field Services Sampling Plan). — All Waste Water analyses comply with methodology requirements of 40 CFR Part 136. — All Drinking Water analyses comply with methodology requirements of 40 CFR Part 141. — Unless otherwise noted,all quantitative results for soils are reported on a dry weight basis. — The Chain of Custody document is included as part of this report. — All Library Search analytes should be regarded as tentative identifications based on the presumptive evidence of the mass spectra. Concentrations reported are estimated values. — Parameters identified as"analyze immediately"require analysis within 15 minutes of collection.Any"analyze immediately"parameters not listed under the header"Field Parameters"are preformed in the laboratory and are therefore analyzed out of hold time. — Method references listed on this report beginning with the prefix"S"followed by a method number(such as S231 OB-97) refer to methods from"Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater . — For microbiological analyses,the"Prepared"value is the date/time into the incurbator and the"Analyzed"value is the date/time out the Incubator. Standard Acronyms/Flags J Indicates an estimated value between the Method Detection Limit(MDL)and the Practical Quantitation Limit(PQL)for the analyte U Indicates that the analyte was Not Detected(ND) N Indicates presumptive evidence of the presence of a compound MDL Method Detection Limit PQL Practical Quantitation Limit RDL Reporting Detection Limit ND Not Detected-indicates that the analyte was Not Detected at the RDL Cntr Analysis was performed using this container RegLmt Regulatory Limit LCS Laboratory Control Sample MS Matrix Spike MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate DUP Sample Duplicate %Rec Percent Recovery RPD Relative Percent Difference LOD DoD Limit of Detection LOQ DoD Limit of Quantitation DL DoD Detection Limit I Indicates reported value is greater than or equal to the Method Detection Limit(MDL)but less than the Report Detection Limit(RDL) (S) Surrogate Compound NC Not Calculated Result outside of QC limits ALS Environmental Laboratory Locations Across North America Canada:Burlington-Calgary-Centre of Excellence-Edmonton-Fort McMurray-Fort St.John-Grande Prairie- London •Mississauga-Richmond Hill-Saskatoon-Thunder Bay Vancouver Waterloo-Winnipeg •Yellowknife United States:Cincinnati-Everett Fort Collins •Holland Houston-Middletown-Salt Lake City-Spring City-York Mexico:Monterrey Report ID:2196967-1/6/2017 Page 3 of 17 Page 46 of 60 Serial_No:010 - AALS,, Enuirorimantal 4 Dogwood,Lane ■Middietown,PA 17057 ■ Phone:717-944-5541 ■ Fax.717-944-1430 ■ www:a15g1obal.cd(n NELAP Certifications: NJ PA010,NY 11759,PA 22-293 DoD ELAP: A2LA 0818.01 State Certifications: DE ID 11 ,MA PA0102,MD 128,VA 460157,WV 343 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Workorder: 2196967 ALP176IL1640950 Lab ID: 2196967001 Date Collected: 12/13/201609:10 Matrix: Solid Sample ID: S4(0-0.5) Date Received: 12/20/2016 10:24 Parameters Results Flag Units RDL MDL Method Prepared By Analyzed By Cntr EXPLOSIVES i 2-Amino-4,6-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.031 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 19:33 CGS A 4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.045 SW846 8330B 12127/16 16:40 JEK 12129/16 19:33 CGS A 3,5-Dinitroaniline ND mg/kg 0.20 0.036 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12129/16 19:33 CGS A 1,3-Dinitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.033 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12129/16 19:33 CGS A 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.033 SW846 8330B 12127/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 19:33 CGS A 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.045 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 19:33 CGS A HMX ND mg/kg 0.20 0.031 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12129/16 19:33 CGS A Nitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.077 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 19:33 CGS A Nitroglycerin ND mg/kg 1.2 0.42 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 19:33 CGS A 4-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.065 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 19:33 CGS A 2-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.025 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 19:33 CGS A 3-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.036 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 19:33 CGS A PETN ND mg/kg 1.2 0.36 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 19:33 CGS A RDX ND mg/kg 0.20 0.011 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 19:33 CGS A Tetryl ND mg/kg 0.20 0.048 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 19:33 CGS A 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.024 SW046 8330B 12/27/16 16.40 JEK 12129/16 19:33,CGS A 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.027 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 19:33 CGS A Surrogate Recoveries Results Flag Units Limits Method Prepared By Analyzed By Cntr 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 103 % 50-150 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 19:33 CGS A 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 99.5 % 50-150 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12129/16 19:33 CGS A WET CHEMISTRY Moisture 23.4 % 0.1 0.01 S254OG-11 12/22/16 08:27 VKB Total Solids 76.6 % 0.1 0.01 S2540G-11 12/22116 08:27 VKB (�itAdbNd1I+M 4•�'+4JL�lJW Ms. Shannon Butler Project Coordinator ALS Environmental Laboratory Locations Across North America Canada:Burlington•Calgary•Centre of Excellence•Edmonton •Fort McMurray•Fort St.John•Grande Prairie•London•Mississauga•Richmond Hill•Saskatoon•Thunder Bay Vancouver Waterloo•Winnipeg-Yellowknife United States:Cincinnati•Everett Fort Collins•Holland• Houston• Middletown•Salt Lake City•Spring City•York Mexico:Monterrey Report ID:2196967-1/6/2017 Page 4 of 17 Page 47 of 60 Serial_No:010 4 } A'ALS' Enulronmental 4,DngWood,Wne ■,PJliddletawri,PA 17057 ■_Phone--717-944-5541 ■ Fax:717.944-7430 ■ WWW.slsglobal.co(n NE LAP Certifications. NJ PA010,NY 11759,PA 22-293 DoD E LAP: A2LA 0818.01 S late Certifications: DE ID 11 ,MA PA0102,MD 128,VA 460157,WV 343 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Workorder: 2196967 ALP176IL1640950 Lab ID: 2196967002 Date Collected: 12/13/2016 11:20 Matrix: Solid Sample ID: S-2(4-6) Date Received: 12/20/2016 10:24 Parameters Results Flag Units RDL MDL Method Prepared By Analyzed ByCntr EXPLOSIVES 2-Amino•4,6-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.030 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 20:19 CGS A 4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.044 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 20:19 CGS A 3,5-Dinitroaniline ND mg/kg 0.20 0.035 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12129/16 20.19 CGS A 1,3-Dinitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0:20 0.032 SW846 8330B 12127/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 20:19 CGS A 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND . mg/kg 0.20 0.032 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16.40 JEK 12/29/16 20:19 CGS A 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.044 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12129/16 20:19 CGS A HMX ND mg/kg 0.20 0.030 SW846 83308 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 20:19 CGS A Nitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.076 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16.40 JEK 12/29/16 20:19 CGS A Nitroglycerin ND mg/kg 1.2 0.41 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 20:19 CGS A 4-Nltrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.065 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 20:19 CGS A 2-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.025' SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 20:19 CGS A 3-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.035 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 20:19 CGS A PETN ND mg/kg 1.2 0.35 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 20:19 CGS A RDX ND mglkg 0.20 0.011 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 20:19 CGS A Tetryl ND mg/kg 0.20 0.047 SW846 8330B •12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 20:19 CGS A 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.024 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 20:19 CGS A 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.026 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 20:19 CGS A Surrogate Recoveries Results Flag Units Limits Method Prepared By Analyzed By Cntr 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 102 % 50-150 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 20:19 CGS A 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 101 % 50-150 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 20:19 CGS A WET CHEMISTRY Moisture 11.2 % 0.1 0.01 S2540G-11 12/22/16 08:27 VKB Total Solids 88.8 % 0.1 0.01 8254OG-11 12/22/16 08:27 VKB Ms. Shannon Butler Project Coordinator ALS Environmental Laboratory Locations Across North America Canada:Burlington•Calgary•Centre of Excellence•Edmonton •Fort McMurray•Fort St.John•Grande Prairie•London •Mississauga•Richmond Hill•Saskatoon•Thunder Bay Vancouver Waterloo•Winnipeg•Yellowknife United States:Cincinnati•Everett•Fort Collins Holland• Houston• Middletown •Salt Lake City•Spring City•York Mexico:Monterrey Report ID:2196967-1/6/2017 Page 5 of 17 Page 48 of 60 Serial_No:014�,, -ALS A- Enuirdnmental- 4 Dagwoad Ltne •Middletown,PA 17057 ■ Phone:717-944-5541 ■ Fax:717-944.1430 ■ www.alsglbbal.cotn NELAP Certifications: NJ PA010,NY 11759,PA22-293 DoD ELAP: A2LA0818.01 State Certifications: DE ID 11 ,MA PA0102,MD 128,VA 460157,WV 343 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Workorder:•2196967ALP176IL1640950 Lab ID: 2196967003 Date Collected: 12/13/2016 11:40 Matrix: Solid Sample ID: S-3(0-0.5) Date Received: 12/20/2016 10:24 Parameters Results Flag Units RDL MDL Method Prepared'By Analyzed By Cntr EXPLOSIVES 2-AminoA,6-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.031 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12129/16 21:04 CGS A 4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.045 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:04 CGS A 3,5-Dinitroaniline ND mg/kg 0.20 0.036 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16.40 JEK 12/29/16 21:04 CGS A 1,3-Dinitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.033 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:04 CGS A 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.033 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:04 CGS A 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.045 SW846 8330B 12127/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:04 CGS A HMX ND mg/kg 0.20 0.031 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:04 CGS A Nitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.077 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:04 CGS A Nitroglycerin ND mg/kg 1.2 0.42 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16.40 JEK 12/29/16 21:04 CGS A 4-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.065 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:04 CGS A 2-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.025 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:04 CGS A 3-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.036 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:04 CGS A PETN ND mg/kg 1.2 0.36 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:04 CGS A RDX ND mg/kg 0.20 0.011 SW846 8330B .12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:04 CGS A Tetryl ND mg/kg 0.20 0.048 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:04 CGS A 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.024 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:04 CGS A 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.027 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16.40 JEK 12/29/16 21:04 CGS A Surrogate Recoveries Results Flag Units Limits Method Prepared By Analyzed By Cntr 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 99 % 50-150 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:04 CGS A 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 98.3 % 50-150 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:04 CGS A WET CHEMISTRY Moisture 12.4 % 0.1 0.01 S2540G-11 12/22/16 08:27 VKB Total Solids 87.6 % 0.1 0.01 S2540G-11 12122/16 08:27 VKB Ms. Shannon Butler Project Coordinator ALS Environmental Laboratory Locations Across North America Canada:Burlington•Calgary•Centre of Excellence•Edmonton •Fort McMurray•Fort St.John•Grande Prairie•London•Mississauga•Richmond Hill•Saskatoon•Thunder Bay Vancouver Waterloo•Winnipeg •Yellowknife United States:Cincinnati•Everett•Fort Collins•Holland Houston• Middletown•Salt Lake City•Spring Cry•York Mexico:Monterrey Report ID:2196967-1/6/2017 Page 6 of 17 Page 49 of 60 Serial_No:0106 14 ,ALS Enuironmtent'Al + 4 Dogwood.,llne ■.Middletown,PA 17057 ■ Phone:-717-944-5541 ■.Fax:717-944.1430 ■ wi9w.a1sg1obal.cotn NE LAP Certifications: NJ PA010,NY 11759,PA 22-293 DoD ELAP: A2LA 0818.01 State Certifications: DE ID 11 ,MA PA0102,MD 128,VA 460157,WV 343 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Workorder: 2196967 ALP176IL1640950 Lab ID: 2196967004 Date Collected: 12/13/2016 12:20 Matrix: Solid Sample ID: S-4(0-0.5) Date Received: 12/20/2016 10:24 Parameters Results Flag Units RDL MDL Method Prepared By Analyzed By Cntr EXPLOSIVES 2-Amino-4,6-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.031 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:50 CGS A 4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.045 SW846 833013 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:50 CGS -A 3,5-Dinitroaniline ND mg/kg 0.20 0.036 SW846 833013 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:50 CGS A 1,3-Dinitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.033 SW846 83308 12/27/16 16.40 JEK 12/29/16 21:50 CGS A 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.033 SW846 83308 12/27/16 16.40 JEK 12/29/16 21.50 CGS A 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.045 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:50 CGS A HMX ND mg/kg 0.20 0.031 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:50 CGS A Nitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.077 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21.50 CGS A Nitroglycerin ND mg/kg 1.2 0.42 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16.40 JEK 12/29/16 21:50 CGS A 4-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.065 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:50 CGS A 2-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.025 SW846 83308 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:50 CGS A 3-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.036 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:50 CGS A PETN ND mg/kg 1.2 0.36 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:50 CGS A RDX ND mg/kg 0.20 0.011 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:50 CGS A Tetryl ND mg/kg 0.20 0.048 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16.40 JEK 12/29/16 21:50 CGS A 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzens ND mg/kg 0.20 0.024 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16.40 JEK 12/29/16 21.50 CGS A 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.027 SW846 83308 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:50 CGS A Surrogate Recoveries Results Flag Units Limits Method Prepared By Analyzed By Cntr 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 100 % 50-150 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:50 CGS A 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 101 % 50-150 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 21:50 CGS A WET CHEMISTRY Moisture 14.1 % 0.1 0.01 S254OG-11 12/22/16 08:27 VKB Total Solids 85.9 % 0.1 0.01 S2540G-11 12/22/16 08:27 VKB Ms. Shannon Butler Project Coordinator ALS Environmental Laboratory Locations Across North America Canada:Burlington•Calgary•Centre of Excellence•Edmonton •Fort McMurray•Fort St.John•Grande Prairie•London •Mississauga•Richmond Hill•Saskatoon•Thunder Bay Vancouver Waterloo•Winnipeg•Yellowknife United States:Cincinnati•Everett•Fort Collins•Holland• Houston•Middletown•Salt Lake City•Spring City•York Mexico:Monterrey Report ID:2196967-1/6/2017 Page 7 of 17 Page 50 of 60 ' Serial_No:0106 , •-14 AALS ' Enuironm'ental Dopood,Ltne,■Middletowp,PA 17057,m Phone:7'17-944-5541 ■_F�% 717.944-1A30 ■ wyvw.,alsgiobal.coo NELAP Certifications: NJ PA010,NY 11759,PA 22-293 DoD ELAP: A2LA 0818.01 State Certifications: DE ID 11 ,MA PA0102,MD 128,VA 460157,WV 343 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Workorder: 2196967 ALP176IL1640950 Lab ID: 2196967005 Date Collected- 12/13/2016 15.00 Matrix: Solid Sample ID:, S-5(2-4) Date Received: 12/20/2016 10:24 Parameters Results Flag Units RDL MDL Method Prepared By Analyzed By Cntr EXPLOSIVES 2-Amino-4,6-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.031 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 22:36 CGS A 4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.045 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 22:36 CGS A 3,5-Dinitroaniline ND mg/kg 0.20 0.036 SW846 8330B 12127/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 22:36 CGS A 1,3-Dinitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.033 SW046 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 22:36 CGS A 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.033 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 22:36 CGS A 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.045 SW846 8330B 12127/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 22:36 CGS A HMX ND mg/kg 0.20 0.031 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16.40 JEK 12/29/16 22 36 CGS A Nitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.077 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 22:36 CGS A Nitroglycerin ND mg/kg 1.2 0.42 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 22.36 CGS A 4-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.065 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 22:36 CGS A 2-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.025 SW846 83308 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 22:36 CGS A 3-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.036 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 22:36 CGS A PETN ND mg/kg 1.2 0.36 SW846 8330B, 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 22:36 CGS A RDX ND mg/kg 0.20 0.011 SWB46 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12129/16 22:36 CGS A Tetryl ND mg/kg 0.20 0.048 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 22:36 CGS A 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.024 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 22:36 CGS A 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.027 SW846 8330B 12127/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 22:36 CGS A Surrogate Recoveries Results Flag Units Limits ' Method Prepared By Analyzed By Cntr 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 101 % 50-150 SW846 8330B 12127/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 22:36 CGS A 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 102 % 50-150 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 22:36 CGS A WET CHEMISTRY Moisture 9.9 % 0.1 0.01 S254OG-11 12/22/16 08:27 VKB Total Solids 90.1 % 0.1 0.01 S2540G-11 12/22/16 08:27 VKB Ms.Shannon Butler Project Coordinator ALS Environmental Laboratory Locations Across North America Canada:Burlington•Calgary-Centre of Excellence•Edmonton •Fort McMurray• Fort St.John•Grande Prairie•London •Mississauga• Richmond Hill •Saskatoon•Thunder Bay Vancouver Waterloo•Winnipeg•Yellowknife United States:Cincinnati•Everett•Fort Collins Holland•Houston• Middletown•Salt Lake City•Spring City•York Mexico:Monterrey Report ID:2196967-1/6/2017 Page 8 of 17 Page 51 of 60 Serial_No:0106 14 A,ALSEnvironmental =' 4 Dogwood��ro�:■,Middletown,PA'17057 : PhonO. � 117-94 4-5541 . •Faxc 1V 717-9�d-7430 . ww:aasgloiiaf.Gotra NE LAP Certifications: NJ PA010,NY 11759,PA 22-293 DoD E LAP: A2LA 0818.01 State Certifications: DE ID 11 ,MA PA0102,MD 128,VA 460157,WV 343 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Workorder: 2196967 ALP176IL1640950 Lab ID: 2196967006 Date Collected: 12/14/2016 08:30 Matrix: Solid Sample ID: S-6(0-0.5) Date Received: 12/20/2016 10:24 Parameters Results Flag Units RDL MDL Method Prepared By Analyied By Cntr EXPLOSIVES 2-Amino-4,6-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.030 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 1/3/17 13:01 CGS A 4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.044 SW846 83308 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 23:22 CGS A 3,5-Dinitroaniline ND mg/kg 0.20 0.035 SW846 83306 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 23:22 CGS A 1,3-Dinitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.032 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16.40 JEK 12/29/16 23:22 CGS A 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.032 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 23:22 CGS A 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.044 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16.40 JEK 12/29/16 23.22 CGS A HMX ND mg/kg 0.20 0.030 SW846 8330B 12127/16 16:40 JEK 12129/16 23.22 CGS A Nitrobenzene ND mg/kg' 0.20 0.076 SW846 83308 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12129/16 23:22 CGS A Nitroglycerin ND mg/kg 1.2 0.41 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16.40 JEK 12/29/16 23 22 CGS A 4-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.065 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 23.22 CGS A 2-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.025 SW846 8330B 12127/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 23:22 CGS A 3-Nitrotoluene - ND mg/kg 0.20 0.035 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 23:22 CGS A PETN ND mg/kg 1.2 0.35 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12129/16 23:22 CGS A RDX ND mg/kg 0.20 0.011 SW846 83308 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 23:22 CGS -A Tetryl ND mg/kg 0.20 0.047 SW846 8330B 12127/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 23:22 CGS A 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.024 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 23:22 CGS A 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.026 SW846 833013 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 23:22 CGS A Surrogate Recoveries Results Flag Units Limits Method Prepared By Analyzed By Cntr 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 103 % 50-150 SW846 83308 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/29/16 23:22 CGS A 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 69.6 % 50-150 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 1/3/17 13:01 CGS A 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 102 % 50-150 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16.40 JEK 12129/16 23:22 CGS A &w, Ms. Shannon Butler Project Coordinator ALS Environmental Laboratory Locations Across North America Canada Burlington •Calgary•Centre of Excellence•Edmonton•Fort McMurray•Fort St.John•Grande Prairie•London 'Mississauga•Richmond Hill•Saskatoon•Thunder Bay Vancouver Waterloo•Winnipeg Yellowknife United States:Cincinnati•Everett•Fort Collins•Holland - Houston•Middletown Salt Lake City•Spring City•York Mexico:Monterrey Report ID:2196967-1/6/2017 Page 9 of 17 Page 52 of 60 Serial No:0106 -14 AALS.- Enuirorimental 4 Dogwood'Lt* si iiddletown,PA 17057 ■_ Phone:7.17-944-5541 .•Fa):717-944-1430 ■ WWW:alsgldbal-toen NELAP Certifications: NJ PA010,NY 11759,PA 22-293 Dol)ELAP: A2LA 0818.01 State Certifications: DE ID 11 ,MA PA0102,MD 128,VA 460157,WV 343 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Workorder: 2196967 ALP176IL1640950 Lab ID: 2196967007 Date Collected: 12/14/2016 09:15 Matrix: Solid Sample ID: S-7(0-0.5) Date Received: 12/20/2016 10:24 Parameters Results Flag Units RDL MDL Method Prepared By Analyzed By Cntr EXPLOSIVES 2-Amino-4,6-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.031 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:08 CGS A 4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.045 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:08 CGS A 3,5-Dinitroaniline ND mg/kg 0.20 0.036 SW846 8330B 12/27%16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:08 CGS A 1,3-Dinitrobenzene ND mg/kg " 0.20 0.033 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:08 CGS A 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.033 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:08 CGS A 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.045 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:08 CGS A HMX ND mg/kg 0.20 0.031 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00.08 CGS A Nitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.077 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:08 CGS A Nitroglycerin ND mg/kg 1.2 0.42 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:08 CGS A 4-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.065 SW846 83308 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00.08 CGS A 2-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.025 SW846 8336B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:08 CGS A 3-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.036 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:08 CGS A PETN ND mg/kg 1.2 0.36 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:08 CGS A RDX ND mg/kg 0.20 0.011 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:08 CGS A Tetryl ND mg/kg 0.20 0.048 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:08 CGS A 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.024 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:08 CGS A 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.027 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:08 CGS A Surrogate Recoveries Results Flag Units Limits Method Prepared By Analyzed By Cntr 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 102 % 50-150 SW046 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:08 CGS A 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 100 % 50-150 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:08 CGS A WET CHEMISTRY Moisture 11.2 % 0.1 0.01 S2540G-11 12/22/16 08:27 VKB Total Solids 88.8 % 0.1 0.01 S254OG-11 12/22/16 08:27 VKB Ms. Shannon Butler Project Coordinator ALS Environmental Laboratory Locations Across North America Canada:Burlington•Calgary•Centre of Excellence•Edmonton •Fort McMurray•Fort St.John •Grande Prairie• London •Mississauga•Richmond Hill•Saskatoon•Thunder Bay' Vancouver Waterloo•Winnipeg•Yellowknife United States:Cincinnati•Everett•Fort Collins Holland•Houston Middletown•Salt Lake City•Spring City•York Mexico:Monterrey Report ID:2196967-1/6/2017 Page 10 of 17 Page 53 of 60 Serial_No:0106 •14 A,ALSEnuironmental 4'Dogwood,Lant� ■•Middletown,PA 17057 ■ Phono:717944-5541- n Fax 717944-1430 n w►vw:211$91obal-cofn NE LAP Certifications: NJ PA010,NY 11759,PA 22-293 DoD ELAP: A2LA 0818.01 S tate Certifications: DE ID 11 ,MA PA0102,MD 128,VA 460157,WV 343 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Workorder: 2196967 ACP176IL1640950 Lab ID: 2196967008 Date Collected: 12/14/2016 11:00 Matrix: Solid Sample ID: S-8(2-4) Date Received: 12/20/2016 10:24 Parameters Results Flag Units RDL MDL, Method Prepared By Analyzed By Cntr EXPLOSIVES 2-Amino-4,6-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.030 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:54 CGS A 4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.044 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:54 CGS A 3,5-Dinitroaniline ND mg/kg 0.20 0.035 SWB46 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:54 CGS A 1,3-Dinitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.032 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:54 CGS A 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.032 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:54 CGS A 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.044 SW846 83308 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:54 CGS A HMX ND mg/kg 0.20 0.030 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:54 CGS A Nitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.076 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:54 CGS A Nitroglycerin ND mg/kg 1.2 0.41 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:54 CGS A 4-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.065 SW846 83308 12/27/16 16:40-JEK 12/30/16 00:54 CGS A 2-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.025 SW846 833013' 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:54 CGS A 3-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.035 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:54 CGS A PETN ND mg/kg 1.2 0.35 SW846 83308 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:54 CGS A RDX ND mg/kg 0.20 0.011 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:54 CGS A Tetryl ND mg/kg 0.20 0.047 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:54 CGS A 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.024 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:54 CGS A 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 0.026 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:54 CGS A Surrogate Recoveries Results Flag Units Limits Method Prepared By Analyzed By Cntr 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 101 % 50-150 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:54 CGS A 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 102 % 50-150 SW846 8330B 12/27/16 16:40 JEK 12/30/16 00:54 CGS A WET CHEMISTRY i Moisture 6.9 % 0.1 0.01 S2540G-11 12/22/16 08:27 VKB Total Solids 93.1 % 0.1 0.01 S2540G-11 12/22/16 08:27 VKB r C�i11URJRdI[Adl Ms. Shannon Butler Project Coordinator ALS Environmental Laboratory Locations Across North America Canada:Burlington •Calgary•Centre of Excellence•Edmonton•Fort McMurray•Fort St.John-Grande Prairie•London•Mississauga•Richmond Hill•Saskatoon-Thunder Bay Vancouver Waterloo•Winnipeg•Yellowknife United States:Cincinnati-Everett•Fort Collins• Holland• Houston- Middletown •Salt Lake City•Spring City•York Mexico:Monterrey Report ID:2196967-1/6/2017 Page 11 of 17 Page 54 of 60 Serial No:0106 -14 ALS A-, A tkogvlorkd Lane :Middletown,PA'17,D57 ■ Phone:,7,17-944-5549 ,■, Fay-'717-944-1-430 n r VM',,aasgl0bai;colt NELAP Certifications: NJ PA010,NY 11759,PA 22-293 DoD ELAP: A2LA0818.01 State Certifications: DE ID 11 ,MA PA0102,MD 128,VA 460157,WV 343 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Workorder: 2196967 ALP1761L1640950 QC Batch: DWPR/1658 Analysis Method: SW846 8330B QC Batch Method: SW846 8330B Associated Lab Samples: 2196967001,2196967002,2196967003,2196967004,2196967005,2196967006,2196967007,2196967008 i METHOD BLANK:2460826 ! . .Blank Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit 2-Amino-4,6-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 3,5-Dinitroaniline ND mg/kg 0.20 1,3-Dinitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 HMX ND mg/kg 0.20 Nitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 Nitroglycerin ND mg/kg 1.2 4-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 2-Nitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 3-Nitrotoluene 0.048J mg/kg 0.20 PETN ND mg/kg 1.2 RDX ND mg/kg 0.20 Tetryl ND mg/kg 0.20 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 ,2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 116 % 50-150 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 100 % 50-150 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:2460827, LCS% Spike LCS %Rec . Parameter Rec Units Conc. Result Limit 2-Amino-4,6-Dinitrotoluene- 105 mg/kg .4 0.42 80-125 4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene 116 mg/kg .4 0.46 80-125 1,3-Dlndrobenzene 97.9 mg/kg .4 0.39 80-125 2,4-Dinitrgtoluene 97.2 mg/kg .4 0.39 80-125 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 64.5 mg/kg .4 0.34 80-120 HMX ` 100 mg/kg .4 0.40 75-125 Nitrobenzene 92.3 mg/kg .4 0.37 75-125 4-Nitrotoluene 90 mg/kg .4 0.36 75-125 2-Nitrotoluene 112 mg/kg .4 0.45 80-125 3-Nitrotoluene 118 mg/kg .4 0.47 75-120 RDX 86 mg/kg .4 0.34 70-135 Tetryl 81.8 mg/kg .4 0.33 10-150 ALS Environmental Laboratory Locations Across North America Canada:Burlington•Calgary•Centre of Excellence•Edmonton •FortMcMurray•fortSt.John•Grande Prairie•London •-Mississauga•Richmond Hill •Saskatoon•Thunder Bay Vancouver Waterloo•Winnipeg Yellowknife United States:Cincinnati•Everett•Fort Collins Holland• Houston Middletown•Salt Lake City•Spring City•York Mexico:Monterrey Report ID:2196967-1/6/2017 Page 12 of 17 Page 55 of 60 Serial_No:0106 4 J� X51 1 AALSEnulydnmental 4 Dogwood,l4ne .,Middletown,PA 17057 ■ Phone-717-944-5541 ■ Fax,717-944-1430 n,`www:,elsglobel.cogi NE LAP Certifications: NJ PA010,NY 11759,PA 22-293 DoD E LAP: A2LA 0818.01 State Certifications: DE ID 11 ,MA PA0102,MD 128,VA 460157,WV 343 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Workorder: 2196967 ALP176IL1640950 1,3,5-Trinitmbenzene 108 mg/kg .4 0.43 75-125 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene 94.6 mg/kg .4 0.38 55-140 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 100 % 50-150 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:2460828 LCS% Spike LCS- %Ree Parameter Ree Units Cone.- Result Limit 2-Amino-4,6-Dinitrotoluene 95.3 mg/kg .4 0.38 80-125 4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene 98.5 mg/kg .4 0.39 80-125 1,3-Dinitrobenzene 98.8 mg/kg .4 0.40 80-125 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 96.9 mg/kg .4 0.39 80-125 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 89.3 mg/kg .4 0.36 80-120 HMX 69.8 mg/kg .4 0.36 75-125 Nitrobenzene 97.9 mg/kg .4 0.39 75-125 4-Nitrotoluene 92.8 mg/kg .4 0.37 - 75-125 2-Nitrotoluene 99.8 mg/kg .4 0.40 80-125 3-Nitrotoluene 108 mg/kg .4 0.43 75-120 RDX 94.5 mg/kg .4 0.38 70-135 Tetryl 83.5 mg/kg .4 0.33 10'-150 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 110 mg/kg .4 0.44 75-125 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene 90.5 mg/kg .4 0.36 55-140 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 99.4 % 50-150 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:2460829 LCS% Spike LCS %Rec- ;Parameter Rae Units Cone. Result Limit 3,5-Dinitroaniline 91.4 mg/kg .4 0.37 70-130 Nitroglycerin 110 mg/kg 2 2.2 70-130 PETN 99.4 mg/kg 2 2.0 70-130 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 101 % 50-150 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:2460830 LCS% Spike LCS %Ree Parameter Rae Units Cone. Result Limit 3,5-Dinitroaniline 94.3 mg/kg .4 0.38 70-130 Nitroglycerin 111 mg/kg 2 2.2 70-130 PET,N 100 mg/kg 2 2.0 70-130 1,4-Dinitrobenzene(S) 101 % 50-150 ALS Environmental Laboratory Locations Across North America Canada:Burlington•Calgary-Centre of Excellence•Edmonton •Fort McMurray•Fort St.John•Grande Qrairie•London •Mississauga•Richmond Hill •Saskatoon•Thunder Bay Vancouver Waterloo•Winnipeg.'Yellowknife United States:Cincinnati•Everett Fort Collins:Holland• Houston•Middletown•Salt Lake City•Spring City•York Mexico:Monterrey Report ID:2196967-1/6/2017 Page 13 of 17 Page 56 of 60 Serial_No:0106 14 AALSEntifironmental 4 Dogwood Large ■Middletown,PA 17057 ■ Phone, 717-944-5541 e Fare:717-944-1430 ■ www.al5global.com NE LAP Certifications: IBJ PA010,NY 11759,PA 22-293 Dol)E LAP. A2LA 0818.01 Stats Certifications: DE ID 11 ,MA PA0102,MD 128,VA 460157,WV 343 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Workorder: 2196967 ALP176IL1640950 QC Batch: WETC/180751 Analysis Method: S2540G-11 QC Batch Method: S2540G-11 Associated Lab Samples: 2196967001,2196967002,2196967003,2196967004,2196967005,2196967006,2196967007,2196967008 SAMPLE DUPLICATE:2459681 ORIGINAL: 2196376001 Original DUP Max Parameter Result Units Result RPD RPD Moisture 99.8624 % 99.9198 .06 10 Total Solids .1375 % .0801 52.8* 5 SAMPLE DUPLICATE:2459682 ORIGINAL: 2196674001 Original DUP Max Parameter Result Units Result RPD RPD Moisture 79.8143 % 79.5285 .36 10 Total Solids 20.1856 % 20.4714 141 5 SAMPLE DUPLICATE:2459683 ORIGINAL: 2196767003 Onginal DUP Max Parameter Result Units Result RPD RPD Moisture 98.3067 % 98.2683 .04 10 Total Solids 1.6932 % 1.7316 2.24 5 SAMPLE DUPLICATE:2459684 ORIGINAL: 2196804001 Original DUP Max Parameter Result Units Result RPD RPD Moisture 9.4584 % 8.5565 10 10 Total Solids 90.5415 % 91.4434 .99 5 SAMPLE DUPLICATE:2459685 ORIGINAL: 2196821001 Onginal DUP Max Parameter Result Units Result RPD RPD Moisture .5341 % .4069 27* 10 Total Solids 99.4658 % 99.593 .13 5 ALS Environmental Laboratory Locations Across North America Canada:Burlington•Calgary-Centre of Excellence•Edmonton Fort McMurray• Fort St.John •Grande Prairie London •Mississauga•Richmond Hill•Saskatoon•Thunder Bay Vancouver Waterloo•Winnipeg•Yellowknife United States:Cincinnati•Everett•Fort Collins Holland Houston• Middletown Salt Lake City•Spring City York Mexico:Monterrey Report ID-2196967-1/6/2017 Page 14 of 17 Page 57 of 60 Serial_No:01064 AALS,' Enulronmental 41309v�ood;lono ■,Middletown,FA 17057 ■ Mono- 717-944-5541 n- Fax_717-944-9430 ■ wWw.alsgiobal.com NE LAP Certifications: NJ PA010,NY 11759,PA 22-293 DoD E LAP: A2LA 0818.01 State Certifications: DE ID 11 ,MA PA0102,MD 128,VA 460157,WV 343 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Workorder: 2196967 ALP176IL1640950 SAMPLE DUPLICATE:2459686 ORIGINAL: 2196952004 Original DUP Max i Parameter Result Units Result RPD RPD Moisture 19.8938 % 21.1925 6.32 10 Total Solids 80.1061 % 78.8074 1.63 5 SAMPLE DUPLICATE:2459687 ORIGINAL: 2196952014 I , Original DUP Max Parameter Result Units Result RPD RPD ; Moisture 5.6718 % 5.6431 .51 10 Total Solids 94.3281 % 94.3568 .03 5 j SAMPLE DUPLICATE:2459688 ORIGINAL: 2196967005 i j Original DUP Max Parameter Result ,Units Result RPD RPD Moisture 9.8504 % 10.3896 5.33 10 Total Solids 90.1495 % 89.6103 .6 5 ALS Environmental Laboratory Locations Across North America Canada:Burlington•Calgary•Centre of Excellence•Edmonton •Fon McMurray•Fort St.John•Grande Prairie•London•Mississauga•Richmond Hill•Saskatoon•Thunder Bay Vancouver Waterloo•Winnipeg•Yellowknife United States:Cincinnati•Everett•Fort Collins•Holland• Houston• Middletown •Salt Lake City•Spring City•York Mexico:Monterrey Report ID:2196967-1/6/2017 Page 15 of 17 Page 58 of 60 Serial No:0106 14 A,ALS, Enuironinental - 4 Dagwood,Lene ■Middletown,PA 17057 ■ Phone:717-9A4 5541 ■ fax:717-944-1430 ■ wavw.alsglabai.tam NE LAP Certifications: NJ PA010,NY 11759,PA 22-293 DoD E LAP: A2LA 0818.01 State Certifications: DE ID 11 ,MA PA0102,MD 128,VA 460157,WV 343 QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE Workorder: 2196967 ALP176IL1640950 Analysis Lab ID Sample ID Prep Method Prep Batch Analysis Method Batch 2196967001 S-1 (0-0.5) S2540G-11 WETC/180751 2196967002 S-2(4-6) S2540G-11 WETC/180751 2196967003 S-3(0-0.5) 82540G-11 WETC/180751 2196967004 S-4(0-0.5) S2540G-11 WETC/180751 2196967005 S-5(2-4) S2540G-11 WETC/180751 2196967007 S-7(0-0.5) S2540G-11 WETC/180751 2196967008 S-8(2-4) S2540G-11 WETC/180751 a 2196967001 S-1 (0-0.5) SW846 8330B DWPR/1658 SW846 8330B HPLC/4280 2196967002 S-2(4-6) SW846 8330B DWPR/1658 SW846 8330B HPLC/4280 2196967003 S-3(0-0.5) SW846 8330B DWPR/1658 SW846 8330B HPLC/4280 2196967004 S-4(0-0.5) SW846 8330B DWPR/1658 SW846 8330B HPLC/4280 2196967005 S-5(2-4) SW846 8330B DWPR/1658 SW846 8330B HPLC/4280 2196967006 S-6(0-0.5) SW846 8330B DWPR/1658 SW846 8330B HPLCA280 2196967007 S-7(0-0.5) SW846 8330B DWPR/1658 SW846 8330B HPLC/4280 2196967008 S-8(2-4) SW846 8330B DWPR/1658 SW846 8330B HPLC/4280 ALS Environmental Laboratory Locations Across North America Canada:Burlington•Calgary-Centre of Excellence-Edmonton•Fort McMurray•Fort St.John•Grande Prairie- London-Mississauga-Richmond Hill •Saskatoon•Thunder Bay Vancouver Waterloo•Winnipeg-Yellowknife United States:Cincinnati-Everett-Fort Collins-Holland-Houston-Middletown•Salt Lake City-Spring City-York Mexico:Monterrey Report ID:2196967-1/6/2017 Page 16 of 17 Page 59 of 60 m SUB vra: ALS-PA co CD CHAIN OF CUSTODYPAGE 1 OF t ' Dot2 t eC�din,Lab: t ALP V a<roi�1 c Report ,• '` Data Deliverables, •. Billinj ` * �, 9" 6, 9 6 7 FAX ❑ L ❑ samo as cum no o m wesdmoroug%Mh mansfieio;MA project Name: C: ITEL 508-SM0220 TEL:50x.62-NDO ❑ AD& ❑ AddY Derwerables Z FAX:5063-N"T83 FAX:fi00.22�298 pC)j N • Project Location:NY 0 S1oto1Fed t:rllerla 4 Client;A ha Ana loal•Lab Pro a Address:a Walkup Drive Pgeet Mang er.Ethan Lel hton MCP PRESUMPTIVE CFIRTAINTY-CT REASONABLE CONFIDENCEPROTOCOLS _ p Yes p No Are MCP Anal i Methods R Ired1 Westborough, ka01581- ALPHAQuote#:- ❑ Yes ❑ No--- Are CT RCP Reasonable Confidence Pmtom Re Fred? Phone:508-8M9220 ANALYSIS Fax: X-Standard ❑Rush tOHLY IF.PRE-APPROVEM SAMPLE NANptING Fr�radert Email: subre arts alhalab co p aorto ❑,Tb maamproshmteanProNouslyanomedbyArpna Due Date:Time: 1.0 UWAwdod D Lob to do ; Other,Project Specific Requirements/Comments/DeteCtlon'Limits_: Presomdon Needs NY,ASP-B Deliverables;See quote 553066 0,Lab to do Pleas"e reference Alpha Job#L1640950.on this report. �'a°1S1p0Clti Cclorn Report Winelude Method Blank,LCS and LCSD. M 0 ALPHAi Lab ID Sample 10 codectim Sample 5ampieei (Lab Use onty) pig Tmrte Mritrlx InilFals su�pr•eputrte cora�enra S-1 (0.0.5) 12I113r1t3 os 114 Soil ® LLJJY. 1111 .ni 4113 C er Te:11r . 8-2(4-6) 12I113H8 11,20 Solt uslody Seals Present? "' — • t S-3 0-0.5 121}3118- 11+:44 soil pf presents Seats Intaci7' Cooter# S-4(0-0.6) IV13116 12;20 Soil I L Received on Ice? .;7CiLbls Comp:gte- S-5 t2-41 11216716= 15:00 Soil C Col!;n Good Coo c S-6 0.0- 121141116 1 013:30 Soil ® Corrt;t Containers? -shipcome: S7 t}0.5 12/141113 09:15 Soil Correct SamF Val') � FedEx JP° ' fD S-8(2-4) +?114118 111:OD .5411 Car,vct PCeservatioOl _ w Heaa.peceftlaniesa`� / J pD�ft�tf� �jj� IZ CD Trackiroghl: lF � �f 7 J_7�1 �!"J _ O .�. u u LEASE ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOVEI _ rn Container Type G _e Ploosoprtntdaarty��epibly 1� Preservative 'A � Y riot deiogp4d In anC r , R nquished sr. vatemme Received 821: DPWITlrrtti ih ewtguoosare A PROJECT E C�7 _ tltlrme'aocKwtnnoi , U1 .A MCP o r CT RC-P? .� ntd..Allm - n,aiwn .' - •�rphadP�Me:uTorm�.,-. i FORT H.G. WRIGHT US Army Corps SOUTHOLD NEW YORK of Engineers FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES (FUDS) PROGRAM WORK AT FIWMD PROPERTY _ Remove _ abandoned . transformer ' Fox Lane Abandoned • • transformer. A Ar ffdLjrjw4A9r my ALOW jw AO�gww ALWCW-z:rkA*",-Mfw BAa*4X 7 L Remove and A-01 cuspose of 6 - (est) }LAIN' J LY 370 gallon UST!9' LIotation of Suokfill and Paver Plant and UM A A restore conemte SurrQ*O to gradO. _4 -45-,� _1CdYOdMCL ZILAVArMV 61Y'EX mo r;I w.<v rAy e_ywe ev m Remove six 370 gallon gasoline tanks. Ab dL Joe a4R f a LA._ 400 to r 's r ..c_." ,+ei3M... _._ 6_.�rr� ,.. .sr •,a�i.l �" J i7L lis:�•!s'J i ti.L L _. ..w. Edge of Battery Butterfield power plant as it appeared in 2011. Propose excavate fill and ramp down to access tank locations. I t PIN/F / „, =EME RSEE I TUU i P PIIOPOGER LEASE LIRE \ � PG 0 ME fOx IAVE j I //\ §�\\\\ \ uN AREA OFACO6 PROPOfim EtMRON!@ITALINVESiIGATION AIID/OR IiFl1EDUTtON P E I %�I O ANCHOR / „°'•i"�+� � .a // I -\- � l \\ \ IsP 1 /-��%'// swc 4�"...T�,':'��'m"rv,,,P PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS -lOwN ill \t -F'�/� PRE➢ARED FOR - - ERG ISCHIO WASTE MANAGEMENT GISfIUC.T - wo A C O E REMEDIATION AREAS - sw.E.r=so fi� WNIGTLER avENGE No Nr J 1 APPENDIX H NEW YORK Parks Recreation STATE OF OPPORTUNITY( and Historic Preservation ANDREW M.CUOMO ROSE HARVEY Governor Commissioner August 4, 2017 Mr. Jim Wade Environmental Engineer 2 NYS Department of Environmental Conservation 50 Circle Road Stony Brook University Stony Brook , NY 11790 Re: DEC Fishers Island Waste Management District- Consolidation of Facilities 2760 Whistler Avenue at Fox Lane, Fishers Island, NY 17PRO2934 Dear Mr. Wade: Thank you for continuing to consult with Division for Historic Preservation of the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP). We have reviewed the submitted materials in accordance with the New York State Historic Preservation Act of 1980 (section 14.09 of the New York Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law). These comments are those of the Division for Historic Preservation and relate only to Historic/Cultural resources. We have reviewed the additional information provided in the July 7, 2017 letter from KGO Consulting, Inc. Based upon this review, we understand that the proposed new construction will not directly impact the historic Butterfield and Barlow Batteries. Further that these Batteries will continue to be used for the current usage. As a result of this review, it is OPRHP's opinion the proposed work will have No Adverse Impact upon historic resource provided the following conditions are met: 1. Plans and specifications for the planned wall improvements to the Batteries will be submitted for our review and comment prior to the initiation of work on these Batteries. 2. A construction protection plan will be put in place to protect the historic Batteries during the new construction. We recognize that these Batteries have been used for waste management purposes for over 30 years and the Battery structures have been impacted by this use. Our intention with the above conditions is to respect the historic footprint of these structures which has survived and contributes to the history of Fort H.G. Wright. The purpose of our review of plans and specifications for the planned wall improvements is to retain this historic footprint outline. Additional correspondence should be provided via our Cultural Resource Information System (CRIS) at www.nvsparks.com/shpo/online-tools/Once on the CRIS site, you can log in as a guest and choose"submit" at the very top menu. Next choose"submit new information for an existing project". You will need this project number and your e-mail address. Division for Historic Preservation P 0 Box 189,Waterford,New York 12188-0189•(518)237-8643•www nysparks com If you have any questions, I can be reached at (518) 268-2181. Sincerely, Beth A. Cumming Senior Historic Site Restoration Coordinator e-mail: beth.cumming@parks.ny.gov via e-mail only Division for Historic Preservation P 0 Box 189,Waterford,New York 12188-0189•(518)237-8643•www nysparks com KGO Consulting, Inc. Environmental Consulting Services 626 RXR Plaza Uniondale,New York 11556 (516)522-2645 July 7,2017 ELECTRONIC FILING-VIA CULTURAL RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEM Ms.Beth A.Cumming Senior Historic Site Restoration Coordinator NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation Division for Historic Preservation P.O.Box 189 Waterford,New York 12888-0189 Re: Fishers Island Waste Management District-Consolidation of Facilities OPRHP Project No.17PRO2934 Dear Ms.Cumming: As the environmental consultant to the Fishers Island Waste Management District (FIWMD), this correspondence is being submitted to provide the information requested in your correspondence dated June 29, 2017 for the above-referenced project. Specifically, the June 29 correspondence included two comments and each are addressed below. Comment- Item 1: Please provide additional information regarding potential impacts to the existing historic batteries. In particular,we note that the proposed mixing building may impact one of the batteries. Response: For 30 years,the former Butterfield and Barlow Batteries have been part of the current solid waste facility, although the waste handling practices have evolved over time. As indicated in Figure 1 as well as the site photographs provided herein,the former Butterfield Battery consists of two bunkers and each are used to hold roll-off dumpsters that receive wastes deposited from above. This use will not change after the proposed improvements are completed. The former Barlow Battery consists of one bunker used as a temporary storage area for shredded logs and brush. A second bunker was filled with concrete and brick rubble over time. The historic tunnels in the two Batteries were also filled and are no longer accessible. At the time of acceptance of land from the Town of Southold, the two Batteries were used for the burning of brush,construction debris and other materials(other than household garbage). In the early 1990's, the burning of materials was being phased out and the FIWMD was required to invest in cleaning out the Batteries. Specifically,the one bunker in the Barlow Battery,rooms and tunnels in the lower levels of the Batteries were backfilled,and a former railway track was removed and the area was regraded. Also performed at that time was ground area sampling and soil removal in areas within the property,in coordination with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. The past practice of open burning in the bunkers in combination with routine operations has weakened the walls and upper structures of the bunkers to the point of risk of failure in select areas. Since the facility is needed to serve residents of the Island,the planned wall improvements and other work will reduce the risk of injury plus bring the site into compliance with OSHA standards. KGO f In regards to the proposed mixing building, as indicated in Figure 1 and the Overall Layout Plan previously submitted,it would be situated to the west of the former Barlow Battery in an area that is unvegetated. As such, the proposed location of the mixing building would not impact the existing concrete areas(upper or lower levels of the Battery). Based on the above,it is respectfully submitted that the two Batteries have been substantially affected and/or modified by past practices and current operations and,therefore,the proposed action would not impact historic resources. Comment-Item 2: Please provide additional information regarding the impact of the potential compactors upon the historic batteries. Response: The lower level of the former Butterfield Battery are currently used to store roll-off dumpsters and bulky wastes,and the proposed compactors (which are also roll-off dumpster units) would be situated in these same areas. The proposed repairs and reinforcement of the walls and upper structures are not associated with the proposed location of the compactors or reconfiguration of the roll-off dumpsters,as such work would need to be undertaken absent the proposed consolidation and overall plan for the solid waste management program. Also,as indicated in the Response to Comment 1,the Batteries have been modified and impacted from past burn practices in combination with the current operations, as well as the backfilling of one bunker, tunnels and rooms for the purpose of providing the current receiving and composting services. Accordingly,it is respectfully submitted that the location of the proposed compactors would not impact the Batteries. It is also important to note that the proposed design situates new buildings and equipment within the operational areas of the current facility,as well as within areas that have been cleared,thus limiting the area of land disturbance and the clearing of natural vegetation. The proposed improvements would also support changes to the solid waste management practices of the FIWMD by, among other things, allowing for the implementation of single-stream recycling,composting of organic materials,and improving its reuse areas. All of these proposed changes are consistent with the recommendations of both New York State' and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencyz to improve waste management practices. The FIWMD would welcome your visit to the subject property to observe the above-described site conditions. If you would like to discuss further,please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Thank you. Sincerely, Kim Gennaro-Oancea,MS,AICP CEP President enc. 1 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.Beyond Waste. A Sustainable Materials Management Strategyfor New YorkState. Adopted 12/27/2010. 2 United States Environmental Protection Agency, U.S.EPA Sustainable Materials Management Program Strategic Plan.Fiscal Years 2017-2022. October 2015. 2 APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY OF MIXING BUILDING AND COMPOST AREA r;. � ' ' ' �o$� Google Earth Fishers Island Waste Management District OPRHP Project No. 17PRO2934 Photographs of Existing Facility o .ac.. PHOTOGRAPH 1: UPPER LEVEL AT SOUTHERN EXTENT OF THE FORMER BUTTERFIELD BATTERY. ROLL-OFF DUMPSTERS ARE VISIBLE AT LOWER LEVEL-NOTE CONDITION OF CONCRETE ON EDGE OF WALLS AND UPPER LEVEL OF BATTERY. Fishers Island Waste Management District OPRHP Project No. 17PRO2934 Photographs of Existing Facility a. y 4C c .a6 4, PHOTOGRAPH 2: LOWER LEVEL OF THE FORMER BUTTERFIELD BATTERY. NOTE THAT THIS AREA IS AND WOULD CONTINUE TO BE USED FOR ROLL-OFF CONTAINERS. Fishers Island Waste Management District OPRHP Project No. 17PRO2934 Photographs of Existing Facility PHOTOGRAPH 3: LOWER LEVEL OF THE FORMER BUTTERFIELD BATTERY AND LOCATION OF PROPOSED COMPACTORS. Fishers Island Waste Management District OPRHP Project No. 17PRO2934 Photographs of Existing Facility • �. ,='r - - '-l-'�-'_f�"•_` ,-�`��" �. -moi•_: ,,�;�- � • �I •.. ��.ani '� ` ` � rC i=�L a :�.r- -• ,-:.�-� ---'- �\ .\-,,,��'- � � _Ill. `'\ • •GRAPH 4: LOWER LEVEL OF • BARLOW Fishers Island Waste Management District OPRHP Project No.17PRO2934 Photographs of Existing Facility a IE • T K PHOTOGRAPH 5: UPPER LEVEL AT NORTHERN EXTENT OF FORMER BARLOW BATTERY.