Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDEIS Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Title of Action: Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company 80/60 Conservation Subdivision Open Development Area Location of Action: Suffolk County,Town of Southold, Orient Parcel Known As Suffolk Co. Tax Map Address North Dyer ND 1000-17.-4-16 21505 Route 25 South Dyer SD 1000-17.-6-14.2 21920 Route 25 North Brown NB 1000-18.-3-30.3 26975 Route 25 South Brown (SB) 1000-18.-6-17.3 7685 Narrow River Rd. 1000-18.-6-18.1 8070 Narrow River Rd. Lead Agency and Contact: Town of Southold, PO Box 1179, Southold NY 11971 Donald J.Wilcenski, Planning Board Chairman, 631-765-1938 Individuals/Organizations Preparing Parts of the Statement(Area of EIS input): 1. Carol Tuthill-Managing Director Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company(overall document preparation and family perspective on proposed action,mitigation and alternatives) 2.Alfred Camissa-Tracker Archeology Services (Archeological and cultural resources) 3.Sam Fitzgerald-Architect(Aesthetic Resources,View Sheds,Architectural Perspective) 4. Bruce Anderson-Environmental Systems (Guidance on completion of DEIS; Water areas) 5. Natural Heritage Program (Protected Species,Vegetative patterns,habitats), 6.John Condon,PE- Condon Engineering (Suffolk County Health Department Subdivision Approval,Water areas) 7.Jason Tuthill-Member Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company,Industrial Engineer(land use and soil calculations and maps) Date Sent to Lead Agency via UPS: September 10, 2018 Date Accepted by Lead Agency: Draft EIS Comments Deadline: l 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Summary-Pages 1-5 • Impact on Farmed Land- 1 page 2. Description of Proposed Action-Pages 6-8 3. Environmental Setting-Page 9 4. Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 -Moderate to Large Potential Impacts-Page 10 5. Impact/Mitigation-Overall project -Pages 11-12 6. Impact/Mitigation--Surface Water -Page 13 -15 7. Impact/Mitigation--Ground Water -Pages 16-20 8. Impact/Mitigation-Flooding -Page 21 • FEMA Maps:North Dyer,South Dyer,North Brown,South Brown -4 Pages • Sketch Maps w%Elevations:North Dyer,South Dyer,North Brown,South Brown-4 Pages 9. Impact/Mitigation--Plants and Animals -Page 22 • NY Natural Heritage Program Report-4 Pages 10.Impact/Mitigation-Agriculture -Pages 23-25 • Proposed Action Impact on Soil Summary- 1 Page • Soil Maps By Parcel-4 Pages • Proposed House Lot and Road Impact on Types of Land Use- 1 Page 11.Impact/Mitigation--Aesthetic Resources -Pages 26-27 12.SD Visual Impact Study-Sam Fitzgerald,Architect • Supplemental Report-3 Pages • Photo Simulation (18 pgs.ea.)-Current; Proposed 5 Lots; Potential Alternative 4 Lots 13.Impact/Mitigation--Historic/Archeological Resources -Pages'28 • Orient Historic District Overview-4 Pages • Example Orient Historic District Houses-4 Pages 14.Phase IB Archeological Survey-Tracker-Al Camissa,Tracker(6 Pgs.+Drive w/full report) 15.Impact/Mitigation--Critical Environmental Areas p.29-30 16.Impact/Mitigation--Community Character -Pages 31-32 17.Alternatives-Page 33-34 i Table Of Contents - Continued Support Material Referenced in Multiple Impact Areas (Tab #s) A.South Dyer Lot Design Alternatives (1, 10, 11, 12, 17) 1. Proposed 5 Lot Map- 1 Page 2.Alternative 4 Lot Map- 1 Page 3. Original 5 Lot Layout to maximize views from lots- 1 Page B. Benefits of Oysters in Nitrogen Reduction (1,2, 5,6,7, 15, 17) 1.Shellfish Culture is Good For the Environment (East Coast Shellfish Growers) -4 Pages 2.Know Your Nitrogen (Alliance for Chesapeake Bay) 4 Pages C.Water Quality/Availability(1,6, 15,17) 1.Stormwater Management Control Plan (Town Code)-3 Pages 2. Orient Harbor Water Analysis (USGS) -.12 Pages 3.Water Usage Calculators-USGS,Waterworks, Grace Foundation) - 3 Pages 4.Our Long Island Aquifers:The Basics (Nassau Suffolk Water Comm.Assoc.) - 2 Pages S.Water Supply Replenishment(SC Comprehensive Water Resources Mgmt Plan) - 1 Pg. 6.Salt Water Intrusion (SC Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan) - 3 Pages D.Wastewater Management(1, 5,6, 15, 17) 1.Septic System Nitrogen Discharge (SCDHS Reclaim Our Water) - 1 Page r' 2. How Conventional Septic Systems Treat HH Wastewater (R.Uebler,PhD) - 21 Pages 3.Individual Sewerage System Approval (SCDHS Sanitary Code) - 2 Pages 4.Standards of Approval of Plans/Construction for Sewage Disposal (SCDHS) - 2 Pages 5. Classification for Possible Advanced Wastewater Treatment Areas (SCDHS) - 2 Pages E.Alternative Wastewater Systems-I/A OWTS (1,6, 17) 1. 2017 Annual Report Alt.Wastewater Treatment Systems- I/A OWTS (SCDHS) - 2 Pgs. 2.SC Approved I/A OWTS (SCDHS) - 3 Pages 3.I/A OWTS Phase 1 and 2 System Descriptions-2 Pages 4.Overview of Provisionally Approved I/A OWTS Technology (SCDHS ROW) - 11 pages 5.What I/A OWTS Homeowners Should Know(SCDHS ROW) -8 pages F.SCDHS Subdivision Application Status (2,6, 7) 1.Test Well Water Analysis (SCDHS) -56 Pages 2.Test Well Certificates (Casola Welldrillers/Kreiger Well&Pump/Peconic Well & Pump) - 18 Pages 3.Notice Of Incomplete Subdivision Applications (SCDHS) - 5 Pages 4. Metes&Bounds Maps Showing Adjacent Wells and Septics (Condon/Corwin) -4 Pages \4 Summary The Tuthill family has a long history in Orient starting with our first ancestor's arrival in 1640. The Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company is a family company currently focused on stewardship for 4 parcels of land. This involves maintaining and growing the current agriculture and aquaculture efforts, and ensuring we have a sufficient number of desirable building lots to pass down to family members. The parcels are known as North Dyer(ND), South Dyer(SD), North Brown (NB) and South Brown (SB). 1. Overview of Proposed Action -The proposed project is an 80/60 Conservation Subdivision Open Development Area located in Suffolk County,Town of Southold, and Hamlet of Orient. It involves 4 parcels comprising about 113 acres. It would preserve 96 acres including 80%of the Buildable acres. There are 17 house lots proposed which represents a 27- lot reduction in Density versus the Yield calculation and a 25-lot (60%) reduction versus individual parcel Standard Subdivisions. #Acres In Proposed Action Yield-#Lots Parcel Unbuildable Buildable Total Prop. Prop Total Total Presrvd. Total Presrvd. Avail. 80/60 Reduct. ND 21.16 5.78 5.78 15.38 9.88 8.3 6 2.3 SD 35.34 15.91 15.91 19.43 14.38 10.6 5 5.6 N B 28.75 2.07 2.07 26.68 21.56 14.5 5 9.5 SB 27.59 1.29 1.29 26.29 25.05 10.8 1 9.8 Total 112.84 25.05 25.05 87.78 70.87 44.2 17 27 V- Activity/Structures ND: 1 summer residence, 2 outbuildings and a right-of-way to the Sound SD:Active agriculture with/one Farm stand (Latham's),Active aquaculture with 2 docks and a shed. NB: Active agriculture, one barn, a future stair/path needed to access the Sound. SB:Active agriculture, one Dock with an access path from Narrow River Road. There are no specific plans to develop additional lots at this time, and we expect little/no development in the foreseeable future. Land Type Present After Completion Difference (in Acres) Unbld Bid Total Unbld Bid Total Unbld Bid Total Meadow/Non Ag 2.07 7.47 9.54 2.07 13.49 15.56 0 6.0 6.0 Forest 28.33 28.33 24.24 24.24 -4.1 -4.1 Agriculture 1.26 51.54 52.80 1.26 45.51 46.77 0 -6.0 -6.0 Wetland 10.33 10.33 10.33 10.33 0 0 Water Surface 7.84 7.84 7.84 7.84 0 0 (aquaculture use) (4.94) (4.94) (4.94) (4.94) 0 0 Unvegetated 3.55 0.29 3.84 3.55 1.71 5.26 0 1.4 1.4 Buildings/Paved 0.14 0.14 2.81 2.812.7 2.7 Total 25 88 113 25 88 113 0 0 0 1 2. Significant Beneficial and Adverse Impacts r a. Beneficial Impacts— Preservation of Land, Scenic Views, Farming- From a community standpoint,the biggest benefit from this project would be permanently preserving 96 acres in Orient, including 86%of the SD property considered to be one of the most scenic parts of the North Fork. It would also leave undisturbed 52 of the 58 farmed acres (90%), which includes Agriculture and Aquaculture. Minimizing Environmental Impact—The 80/60 Conservation Subdivision reduces density versus Standard Subdivisions from 42 lots to 17, a 60%decrease.This significantly mitigates the environmental impact on all 9 areas assessed to have a potentially moderate to large impact: Surface Water, Groundwater, Flooding, Plants/Animals,Agriculture,Aesthetic Resources, Historic and Archeological Resources, Critical Environmental areas, and Community Character. Clustering and placement of the house lots minimizes impact on scenic views, agriculture and prime soils.Ten houses would not be visible from Public roads: NB (5), SB (1), and ND (4).The remaining two North Dyer houses are set back more than 300'from the Main Road with a lawn in the Open Space, which was originally part of the House of Seven Gables destroyed in the 1938 hurricane.The lawn provides a visually pleasing buffer between the houses and the Main Road.The 5 houses on South Dyer are tucked back on the east side of the property,which is the least visible part of the property. They do not block or obstruct the scenic views from NYS Route 25 or Orient Harbor. (` b.Adverse Impacts—SEQRA Assessment—The Town of Southold's review concluded that our project potentially has a moderate to large impact on 9 of the 18 areas measured: 1. Impact on Surface Water—Water quality in or downstream of action 2. Impact on Groundwater—New wells and septic systems, water demand, wastewater discharge, contaminated water, commercial pesticide proximity 3. Impact on Flooding—Modification of existing drainage patterns 4. Impact on plants/animals—Reduction in habitats of endangered species 5. Impact on Agriculture—Prime soil impact, limiting access, loss of farm land >2.5 acres, development pressure, not consistent with Farmland Protection Plan 6. Impact on Aesthetic Resources—Scenic Byway/scenic view impact 7. Impact on Historic/Archeological Resources—Character versus Historic District, destruction/alteration of designated archeological site 8. Impact on Critical Environmental Area (Peconic Bay)—Reduce Quality,of resource 9. Consistency with Community Character—Creates demand for additional services; inconsistent with architectural scale/character 2 3. Proposed Mitigation a. Measures already taken (Details are covered in the full report that follows) Overall- Proposing an 80/60 Conservation Subdivision versus a Standard Subdivision significantly reduces the impact on all 18 environmental areas covered in SEAR by preserving all 25 acres of wetlands, bluffs and beaches, and 80%of the Buildable area (71 acres) and by reducing density by 60% bringing potential house lots from 42 to 17. Agriculture (Prime Soil Groups) • Of the 52 acres of active farmland preserved (agriculture and aquaculture), 6.3 acres represent mitigation already built into our proposal: 2.5 acres by transferring development rights for three SB (Soil Group 1) lots to unfarmed ND (Soil Group 5); 3.8 acres by placing five NB lots in a currently wooded (Soil Group 5) area. • We proposed widening/improving current unpaved farm roads to form the new roads, which will continue to be used for agricultural purposes. • Clustering the lots on SD in a niche on the SE boundary of the property mitigates interruption of farm management practices. Aesthetic Resources, Community Character—Scenic View impact has been significantly minimized by reducing density and by house siting.The Conservation Subdivision reduces scale of the houses by limiting lot sizes (proposed average lot is—36,000 s.f.)versus the required 80,000 s.f. zoning. The SD visual impact was significantly reduced by proposing 5 lots versus the yield of 10, and clustering them on the least visible east border of the property. Only two other houses, both on ND, would be visible from NYS Route 25 and they are set back 300+feet from the road. t The proposed 25' private right of ways on ND, SD and NB are more in keeping with the rural character of the surrounding areas than a 50' curbed road. We meet the requirement for 25' roads since our 17-lot density is less than R-200 density (19 lots). Planning Board and NY Superintendent of Highways approvals are needed. Surface/Ground Water and protection of a Critical Environmental Area -The proposed SD design represents a 50%density reduction, which significantly lowers Ground and Surface water impacts versus the SCDHS Design Flow standards for water usage and wastewater discharge.The SD Design Flow is only 28%of the level allowable by the SCDHS Yield and half the level of the Zoning Yield. This represents a significant mitigation relative to Nitrogen impact on Ground and Surface waters. Our Aquaculture operation on SD is improving the quality of the Peconic Bays by removing—23 pounds of Nitrogen from the water for every 10,000 oysters we ship. In 2017 we shipped over 700,000 oysters, which represents elimination of 1,610 pounds of Nitrogen from the Peconic Bay. This is 8 times the estimated maximum annual Nitrogen discharge of the SD lots and more than double all 17. Since the business started in 2003, we have shipped about 2,000,000 oysters, which eliminated 4,600 pounds of nitrogen,the equivalent of 7 years from our total project. Wetland/Bluff Protection—We have built-in a 100' lot setback from all wetlands and coastal erosion Hazard Area lines to further protect these fragile'areas. b.Additional Potential Mitigation Overall -When we develop lots we will use the best practices and technologies available at that time,that are proven effective in comparable situations, and that are not cost prohibitive. 3 4. Alternatives _. a. Move one lot from South Dyer to North Dyer or North Brown in area that is not currently farmed— We would adjust the remaining 4 SD lots so boundaries would be to the east of the existing farm road. See attached SD 4-lot alternate layout. Mitigation on Environmental Impact - Fewer houses in the far eastern border of South Dyer, which is contiguous with the Orient Historic District,would lessen the potential impact on: • The view from the Route 25 Scenic By-Way (Aesthetic Resources, Historic Resources, and Consistency with Community Character) • Agricultural land and Prime Soils irreversibly converted to residential use -an additional 1.7 acres of actively farmed,Soil Group 1 land would remain in agriculture. • The Peconic Bay and Orient Tidal Creek (Critical Environmental Areas) -Surface Water, Ground Water and Flooding Impact would be reduced by 20% (4 lot impact versus 5 lots) b. No Action Likely Circumstances At The Project Site If The Project Does Not Proceed- If the proposed project does not proceed, one house could be built on each of the 3 parcels that currently have no houses (South Dyer, North Brown, and South Brown).This would not preclude applying for Subdivisions at a future date.The 3 potential new houses would be built in line with all building, zoning and Health Department codes and regulations, but would not be governed by further Subdivision standards and requirements. c. Likely Future Conditions If Developed To Maximum Allowed Under Existing Zoning Standard Subdivisions represent the maximum development allowed under existing zoning. The Standard Subdivision Yield calculations would total 42 houses,versus 17 proposed; 52.7 Buildable acres would be kept as Open Space (60%)versus 70.9 acres (80%) proposed. Standard Versus Proposed Conservation Subdivision Implications R-80 Zone R-200 Zone Total ND SD NB SB SB Buildable Acres 15.38 19.43 26.68 15.57 10.72 87.8 Yield -# Lots Std. Sub. 8 10 14 8 2 42 Yield -#Lots Prop. Cons. 6 5 5 1 0 17 Yield Std.Vs Prop. Cons. +2 +5 +9 +7 +2 +25 Preserved Ac.—Std. Sub. 9.2 11.7 16.0 9.3 6.4 52.7 Preserved Ac.-Prop. Cons. 9.9 14.4 21.6 14.3 10.7 70.9 Prsvd.Std.Vs Prop. Cons. -0.7 -2.7 -5.6 -5.0 -4.3 -18.2 Environmental Impact of Standard Subdivisions Versus the Proposed Prgjgq-Standard Subdivisions would create a sizeable increase in the impact on all environmental areas versus our Conservation Subdivision proposal, due mainly to 25 additional houses and 18 fewer preserved Buildable acres. Depending on placement of the house lots,total active farmland would be reduced between 6 and 23 acres, a 12%to 44%loss, compared to a 6 acre (10%) loss of agricultural land proposed. See attached farm impact details.Also, it is highly likely more houses would be visible from NYS Route 25. 4 S. Issues of Controversy a. SD Parcel—We proposed 5 lots on SD: 4 that SD would have as a stand-alone parcel and 1 from the aggregation of the 4 parcels.The yield for our combined 4-parcel project is 17 lots. If we had done separate subdivisions on each parcel,the combined yield would be 16 lots, due to by-parcel rounding. We clustered the 5 SD lots on the eastern property boundary,which is adjacent to the Orient Historic District.This minimizes the Route 25 visual impact of the lots for motorists, bicyclers and pedestrians. There is also concern that the size and type of SD houses would not be in keeping with the character of the village.The size/design of these houses is very speculative since we are not planning any development in the foreseeable future. Future houses will fully comply with zoning and building code requirements, including any house design standards in place at the time. The Conservation Subdivision reduces scale of the houses by limiting lot sizes (proposed average SD lot is—39,000 s.f.)versus the required 80,000 s.f. zoning. We intend for the type of house to be compatible with the 9 styles of architecture in the village as reported by the Historical Society. b.Transfer of Development Rights—Concern has been raised that we are transferring Development Rights across non-contiguous parcels. We are proposing moving 3 SB lots in active farmland with Soil Group 1 to ND,which is currently not farmed, has glacial boulders and Soil Group 5.This will preserve 2.5 acres active Soil Group 1 farmland. The placement of a 5th lot on SD represents a lot that is allowed based on the combined 4-parcel acreage and not transfer of development rights. 6. Matters To Be Decided Determine if our DEIS is sufficient for a Negative SEAR Declaration, or conditional Negative Declaration. If so,we expect to receive Sketch Plan, or Conditional Sketch Plan approval of our proposal. 7. Required Permits and Approvals Agency/Department Permit Required Approval Required NYS Department of 1. Wetlands SEQRA Review Environmental Conservation 2.Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Superintendent of Highways 25' Roads with 5+ houses NYS Dept. of Transportation 1. Highway Work Permits SD Farm Stand access to NY25 2. NY 25 access permits ea. site Sidewalk decision. Orient Fire District Water tanks,wells, road specs NYS Parks, Recreation, Historic 1. 50+Year old adjacent Preservation property review 2. 113 Archeological Study Suffolk County Health Services Realty Subdivision Application 1. Final location sewage, water for each parcel 2. SEQRA Review Land Preservation Purchase Development Rights NYS Natural Heritage Program Presence of protected species Town Board Overall Project Approval 1 5 IMPACT ON FARMED LAND -- ACRES* Total Buildable Acres ND SD NB Total 15.38 19.43 26.68 :2]6.29 87.78 Proposed 80/60 Conservation Subdivision Versus Current Agriculture--Includes Land For Equipment Access and Auxilliary Structures Aquaculture Total ND, SD NB SB Total SD Farmed Current 0 20.7 12.0 20.1 52.8 4.9 57.7 Proposed 0 15.9 12.0 18.9 46.8 4.9 51.7 Diff Prop vs Curr-Acres 0 -4.8 0.0 -1.2 -6.0 0.0 -6.0 Diff Prop vs Curr-% 0 -23% 0% -6% -11% 0% -10000 Standard Subdivision Versus Current and Proposed Conservation Subdivision Agriculture-- Includes Land For Equipment Access and Auxilliary Structures Aquaculture Total ND SD NB SB Total SD Farmed Minimum Impact ** 0 12.9 12.0 15.8 40.7 4.9 45.6 Versus Current-Acres 0 -7.8 0.0 -4.3 -12.1 0.0 - -12.1 Versus Current-% 0% -38% 0% -22%- -23% 0% -21% Versus Proposed-Acres 0 -3.0 0.0 -3.1 -6.1 0.0 -6.1 Versus Proposed -% 0% -19% 0% -16% -13% 0% -12% Maximum Impact** 0 12.9 1.4 9.6 23.9 4.9 28.8 Versus Current-Acres 0 -7.8- -10.7 -10.5 -29.0 0.0 -29.0 Iv ersus Current-% 0% -38% -89% -52% -55% 0% -50% ersus Proposed-Acres 0.0 -3.0 -10.7 -9.3 -22.9 0.0 -22.9 ersus Proposed -% 0% 719% -89% -49% -49% 0% -44% *Buildable Acres except Unbuildable for all Aquaculture and 1.26 Agriculture Acres on SD ** Minimum Impact based on lots placed in all non farmed area first and remaining in currently farmed area Maximum Impact based on'lots placed in all currently farmed area 2018-9-10 Description of Proposed Action 1. Purpose of Proposed Subdivision The proposed 80/60 Conservation Subdivision Open Development Area will enable the Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company to maintain/grow its current agriculture and aquaculture efforts, and ensure sufficient desirable building lots can be passed down to future generations of the family. It will also preserve important view sheds and the agricultural and rural character of the area for the benefit of the North Fork community and its visitors. The Town of Southold and Hamlet of Orient have declared the need to protect and preserve the overall environment in our communities including our natural resources, agriculture and aquaculture operations, endangered species, historically and archeologically important areas and the aesthetic character of the community. Our proposed subdivision will permanently preserve 96 acres of land and support continuation of 90%of the acreage currently being farmed (agriculture and aquaculture). It will reduce the number of allowable house lots by 60%,which will minimize the potential impact on the environment. We have located our lots so they have minimal impact on important scenic views and sensitive archeological areas and habitats of endangered species. 2. Location and Physical Dimensions of the Action a. Location and Access-All parcels are located in Orient • ND is located at 21505 NYS Route 25 on the north side of the road. It is approximately 366 feet west of Oysterponds Lane. T • SD is located at 21920 NYS Route 25 on the south side of the road. It is approximately 460 feet west of Oysterponds Lane. • NB is located at 26975 NYS Route 25 on the north side of the road. It is approximately 2,223 feet east of Platt Road. • SB is comprised of two tax parcels: SCTM#18-6-17.3 is located at 7685 Narrow River Road on the north side of the road.The parcel is most easily accessed from NYS 25 on the south side of the road about 1,960 feet east of Platt Road. SCTM# 18-6-18.1 is located at 8070 Narrow River Road on the south side of the road just east of the public landing. b. Physical Dimensions-This proposal is for an 80/60 Conservation Subdivision of four parcels containing 17 residential lots. It has a total area of about 113 acres of which 96 will be preserved. This project proposes the transfer of yield in line with Chapter 240-42 G of the Southold Town Code. Parcel SCTM# Total Preserved Land-Acres Development # Name 1000- Acres Unbuildable Buildable Total Area Lots North Dyer (ND) 17-4-16 21.16 5.78 9.88 15.65 5.51 6 South Dyer(SD) 17-6-14.2 35.34 15.91 14.38 30.29 5.05 5 North Brown (NB) 18-3-30.3 28.75 2.07 21.56 23.63 5.12 5 South Brown (SB) 18-6-17.3 26.92 1.29 25.05 26.34 1.25 1 18-6-18.1 0.67 Tota I 1 112.84 1 25.05 70.87 95.91 1 16.93 17 6 3. Background and History of the Action John Tuthill,the father of two of the Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company Directors,was very concerned with preserving his 4 parcels of Orient land to provide a place for future generations to visit and to live full time, and generating income from the land so it would not be a burden on the family. In the mid 1980's the State of NY began a process, via Eminent Domain,to acquire Tidal Wetlands in Orient. Despite the family's excellent stewardship of this land for 200+years and John pursuing every avenue of the legal process,—28 acres of SB were acquired in 1989.This became a catalyst to form the John Tuthill Limited Partnership to help keep the remaining property in the family and ensuring it could produce sufficient income to cover costs of maintaining the property. In 2006,the Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company replaced the John Tuthill Limited Partnership. For almost 20 years, we focused on creating Standard Subdivisions to generate the largest number of house lots to pass down to future generations. During this period, we completed land surveys, and sketch and yield plans on all 4 parcels. While the large number of lots was appealing, we were concerned that up to 44%of the active farm acres could be eliminated and this might jeopardize the entire agricultural effort. We also learned we would need to complete roads/infrastructure for all 4 parcels before the subdivisions would be finalized, even though we had no immediate development plans. This led us to explore Conservation Subdivision options. While this significantly decreased the number of house lots we could have,from 42 to 17,there would be only minimal impact on the acres currently being farmed.We also learned the new Open Development Area program would allow us to finalize the Subdivisions without installing the roads/infrastructure until we wanted to build houses. In 2010, we decided to combine all 4 parcels in an 80/60 Conservation Subdivision Open Development Area (ODA) application.This gave us an acceptable number of lots to pass down to future generations, protected our ability to continue the current agriculture and aquaculture operations and preserved the scenic and rural character of the community. Recently we learned the ODA would not result in approved lots, so we would now like to go forward with the full 80/60 Conservation Subdivision. 4.Timing and Schedule—Given our intention to keep the land in our family, it will likely be many years before all 17 lots are developed and most will be summer/vacation homes. If a family member wanted to sell a lot, our Tuthill Holding Company or any direct descendant of John and Elsa Tuthill would have the first refusal right to buy the property, which prevents/deters faster development. S. Relationship of Action to Land use plans,Zoning Restrictions. Local/Regional/State Programs a. Land Use/Zoning Restrictions-The proposed action involves residential, agriculture and aquaculture uses,which are in use in Orient. It is compliant with R-80 and R-200 zoning. b.Suffolk County Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan—We have successfully completed the test well and soil capability studies of the SCDHS Subdivision Application Process and have confirmed we have sufficient potable water and septic capability on each of our proposed parcels. This ensures we are in line with the new Suffolk County Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan.To complete the SCDHS process we need to obtain Wetlands and Coastal Erosion Hazard Area permits, receive a Negative SEQRA Declaration, and submit final maps. c. NYS Natural Heritage Program There was one recently documented rare plant species in the project vicinity, but it grows in a wetland and our action will not disturb anything within 100' of the wetlands. There were 11 other rare/endangered species documented in 1944 or earlier. There is low likelihood that these species are present, and their habitat is not in any of the areas that will be disturbed. 7 The Archeological IB Survey did Shovel Tests and walkovers covering our 17 proposed lots, roads and some additional areas. No historic artifacts were found. However,there were white quartzite artifact fragments found on the proposed SB lot, which is evidence of a prehistoric site. If we want to proceed with this SB lot location, Phase If intensive testing is recommended. d.Southold Town Farm and Farmland Protection Strategy20001—Our 3 actively farmed parcels are on the Protection Strategy Inventory. Our proposed 80/60 Conservation Subdivision and plans to preserve 90%of the active Farmland is in line with the community farmland preservation strategies. e. Community Preservation Project Plan (2008)—Our 4 parcels are on the Eligible Parcel List for preserving open-space resources and keeping the Town beautiful for future generations to enjoy. Our 80/60 Conservation Subdivision will protect existing farming operations and scenic view sheds. f. Orient National Historic District—We proposed 5 houses on SD, which borders the Historic District. Since SD lot sizes are on average—39,000 s.f versus the 80,000 s.f. zoning requirement,this ensures future houses will have appropriate scale. There are no documented architectural standards for houses in/near the Historic District.There are many styles of architecture in the District including: Cape Cod, Federal, Greek Revival, Italianate, Second Empire, rural vernacular, and ornate frame structures of the late Victorian era. We intend our SD houses to be compatible with these styles. g. NYS Historic Preservation Program - ND and SD are substantially contiguous to the Historic District. h. NYS DEC Critical Environment Area Program—We will comply with all permit and SCDHS requirements. Our Oysterponds Shellfish Aquaculture operation is improving the quality of the water in the Peconic Bays by removing Nitrogen from the water.According to the East Coast Shellfish Growers Association, for every 10,000 oysters we ship, 23 pounds of Nitrogen is removed from the water. In 2017 we shipped over 700,000 oysters, representing 1,610 pounds of nitrogen elimination from the Peconic Bays area. This is more than double the maximum Nitrogen we would discharge into ground and surface waters annually from our 17 proposed homes. Since we started our aquaculture business in 2003 we have shipped about 2 million oysters,which has eliminated 4,600 pounds of Nitrogen from the Orient Harbor/Peconic Bays—over 7 years of the maximum discharge from our project. 6.Authorizations, Permits,Approvals Required Agency/Department Permit Required Approval Required NYS Department of 1. Wetlands SEQRA Review Environmental Conservation 2.Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Superintendent of Highways 25' Roads with 5+ houses NYS Dept. of Transportation 1.Highway Work Permits SD Farm Stand access to NY25 2. NY 25 access permits ea.site Sidewalk Decision Orient Fire District Water tanks,wells, road specs NYS Parks, Recreation, Historic 1. Adjacent property review Preservation 2. 1B Archeological Study Suffolk County Health Serv. Realty Subdivision Applications 1. Final location sewage, water for each parcel 2. SEQRA Review Land Preservation Purchase Development Rights L - NYS Natural Heritage Program Presence of protected species Town Board Overall Project approval 8 Environmental Setting 1. Existing Environment-All 4 parcels in the proposed action are in the Hamlet of Orient. s - a.Zoning Districts: of the 113 acres, 101 (89%) are in R-80 and 12 on SB (11%) are in R-200. b. Historic District:Some of the east boundary of SD is adjacent to the Orient National Historic District. ND is considered to be substantially contiguous to the Historic District. c. Environmental Setting-Adjacencies to each parcel (Reference: SC Tax Map 8/19/1996) Parcel Parcel Boundaries Tax Map 1000 North East South West ND: 17-4-16 Long Island Sound 7 Residential Lots NYS Route 25 4 Residential Lots SD: 17-6-14.2 NYS Route 25 11 Residential Lots Peconic Estuary _ 1 Residential Lot NB: 18-3-30.3 Long Island Sound 6 Residential Lots, NYS Route 25, 4 Residential Lots Peconic Land Trust 1 Residential Lot (16.8 Ac) SB : 18-6-17.3 NYS Route 25, 1 Residential Lot, Narrow River Rd. 1 Residential Lot, 1 Residential Lot Agricultural (i9.3 Ac) T/o/Southold(62.3 Ac) SB: 18-6-18.1 Narrow River Rd. NYS wetlands Narrow River/ T/o/Southold Wetlands Hallock Bay Note: Not all Residential Lots have been developed 2. Current Uses of Project Sites a. Overall Acreage Composition: Vegetated/ Buildings/ Water Non Agric. Forest Agricult. UnVeget. Paved Wetlands Surface* Total Current 9.5 28.3 52.8 3.8 0.14 10.3 7.8 113 Proposed 15.6 24.2 46.8 5.3 2.8 10.3 7.8 113 Diff +6.0 -4.1 1 -6.0 1 +1.4 1 +2.7 1 0 1 0 1 0 * Includes 4.9 acres of Aquaculture b. North Dyer-There is currently one seasonal residence on the property and two Auxiliary Buildings. These buildings and the gravel driveway comprise about 3%of the Buildable area.The balance of the parcel is split between forested areas (-60%) and Lawns/meadows ("'40%).There is a right-of-way path to the Sound.This parcel has been partially farmed in the past, but is not currently. c. South Dyer -All the,buildable area is used for agriculture including the paths for the equipment and one Farm Stand-Latham's. A 4.9-acre Aquaculture operation with 2 docks and 1 shed is located in/next to the Tidal Creek on the south side of the property. d. North Brown is farmed on about half of the Buildable area and has one auxiliary building. The balance is forested and the Unbuildable area is vegetated bluff going down to the Long Island Sound. We plan to add a stair/path right-of way access to the Sound; a permit will be needed for this. e. South Brown -The Buildable area is about 75% in agriculture with the balance in woods and ( overgrown meadow.There is a dock, and right-of-way path to it, on the small parcel on the south side of Narrow River Road. 9 SEQRA Full Environmental Assessment- Identification of Potential Project Impacts Question Area Impact Potential Impact Expert Answer No/small Mod/Large Resource 1.Impact on Land Yes 7 0 2.Impact on Geological Features Yes 2 0 3.Impact on Surface Water Yes 10 1 John Condon i.Affect water quality in or downstream of action x Bruce Anderson 4.Impact on Groundwater Yes 1 6 John Condon a. New wells/more demand on current wells x b.Water demand exceeds safe withdrawal x Bruce Anderson c.Located in areas without water/sewer service x d.Wastewater discharged to groundwater x e.Ground water for wells may be contaminated x g.Commercial pesticide application<100'of water x 5.Impact on Flooding Yes 5 1 John Condon d. Modification of existing drainage patterns x 6.Impact on Air No 7.Impact on Plants and Animals Yes 7 1 NYS Natural b. Reduction in habitats of endangered species x Heritage Prg 8.Impact on Agricultural Resources Yes 1 6 a.Group 1-4 soil groups impact x b.Crosses,limits access to agricultural lands x c.Excavates/compacts soil of active agriculture x d. Irreversibly converts>2.5 acre agricultural land x f.Increases development pressure on farmland x g. Not consistent w Farmland Protection Plan x 9.Impact on Aesthetic Resources Yes 1 5 a.Visible from designated Scenic By-Way x b.Obstructs,eliminates designated scenic view x Sam c.Visible from public vantage points x Fitzgerald d.Viewers engaged in work,recreation,tourism x e. Diminishes enjoyment of Aesthetic resource x 10.Impact on Historic/Archeological Resources Yes 1 5 a. Near State/National Register of Historical Places x b. Near SHPO designated archeological sites x d. May result in destruction/alteration of site x Tracker e.May result in alteration of setting/integrity x f. May introduce out of character visual elements x 11.Impact on Open Space and Recreation Yes 4 0 12.Impact on Critical Environmental Areas Yes 1 1 John Condon b. Reduced quality of CEA Characteristic x 13.Transportation Yes 5 0 14.Impact on Energy Yes 4 0 15.Impact on Noise,Odor,Light Yes 5 0 16.Impact on Human Health Yes 12 0 17.Consistency with Community Plans Yes 7 0 18.Consistency with Community Charater Yes 4 2 b.Creates a demand for additional services x Sam e. Inconsistent w architectural scale/character x Fitzgerald SUMMARY 17 Yes-1 No 77 28 10 Overall Impacts / Mitigation Overall Project— Positive Impacts-The Proposed Action covers about 113 acres of property on 4 parcels of land in Orient. It would preserve 96 acres (85% of total)—all 25 of the Unbuildable area and 80%of the Buildable area (71 acres). Standard Subdivisions would preserve 18 fewer Buildable acres. Proposed Density would be reduced from 42 lots to 17, a 60% reduction. The houses would be clustered. Overall Mitigation—The proposed project has significantly less impact than a Standard Subdivision by preserving more land and reducing density.This importantly reduces all 9 potentially moderate to large SEQR impact areas:Surface Water, Ground Water, Flooding, Agriculture,Aesthetic Resources, Critical Environmental Areas, Historical Resources, Community Character and Plants/Animals. Agriculture • The proposed project would preserve 52 acres, 90%of the 57.7 acres of actively farmed (agriculture and aquaculture) land. Depending on house placement, Standard Subdivisions would reduce active agriculture by 6 to 23 acres, a 12%to 44% loss versus a 6 acre (10%) loss for the proposed project. • Of the 52 preserved acres of active farmland in our proposal, 6.3 acres represent mitigation already taken: o 2.5 acres in Soil Group 1, by transferring development rights for 3 SB lots to ND o 3.8 acres in Soil Group 3 by placing 5 NB lots in a currently wooded area • We proposed widening/improving current unpaved farm roads to form the new roads,which will continue to be used for agricultural purposes. • Clustering the lots mitigates interruption of farm management practice. Aesthetic Resources, Community Character—Scenic View impact has been significantly minimized by reducing density and by house siting.The Conservation Subdivision reduces the scale of the houses by limiting lot sizes (proposed average lot is—36,000 s.f.)versus the R-80 required 80,000 s.f. • SD -The 5 proposed houses are placed in the least visible part of the lot.They would not obstruct, eliminate or significantly screen the important scenic view of the farmland,the Peconic Bay and the Tidal Creek.The Standard Subdivision yield for this property would have added another 5 lots and all of them would reduce agricultural land and directly impact the important scenic view. • NB SB- Houses on North and South Brown would not be visible from the Scenic Byways of Route 25 and Narrow River Road so there would be no scenic view impact on these parcels. • ND-There would be two houses on North Dyer that would be visible from Route 25, but they would be set back 300+feet from the Road so the view impact would be minimized. • Roads—We are proposing 25' private right of ways versus more formal 50' curbed roads. We meet the requirement for 25' roads since our 17-lot density is less than R-200 density (19 lots). Planning Board and NY Superintendent of Highways approvals are needed.The less formal 25' roads would allow better surface water management and drainage as well as being more in keeping with the rural character of our parcels and the surrounding areas. 11 Surface/Ground Water and protection of a Critical Environmental Area (Peconic Bays and Environ) The proposed SD design represents a 50% density reduction, which significantly lowers Ground and r Surface water impacts versus the SCDHS Design Flow standards for water usage and wastewater discharge.The SD Design Flow is only 28%of the level allowable by the SCDHS Yield and half the level of the Zoning Yield. This represents a significant mitigation relative to Nitrogen impact on Ground and Surface waters. Our Oysterponds Shellfish Aquaculture operation on SD is improving the quality of the Peconic Bays by removing Nitrogen from the water. For every 10,000 oysters we ship we are removing about 23 pounds of nitrogen from the Peconic Bay. In 2017 we shipped over 700,000 oysters,which represents elimination of 1,610 pounds of Nitrogen from the Peconic Bay areas.This is more than double the maximum Nitrogen discharge our 17 house lots would discharge annually. Since the business started in 2003,we have shipped about 2,000,000 oysters,which eliminated 4,600 pounds of nitrogen,the equivalent of 7 years of the maximum discharge from our project. Wetland/Bluff Protection—We have built in a 100' lot setback from all wetlands and coastal erosion Hazard Area lines to further protect these fragile unbuildable areas. Additional Potential Mitigation Overall -When we are ready to develop a specific lot,we will utilize the Best Practices and Technologies available at that time,that are proven effective in comparable situations, and that are not cost prohibitive.This will avoid or significantly reduce potential environmental impacts. l 12 Impact on Surface Water EAF Part 2 Potential Moderate to Large Impact The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or downstream of the site of the proposed action. Lead Agency Concern Areas The impacts of the new sanitary systems proposed on nearby water bodies Magnitude, importance Overall—The proposed 17 lots are within or downstream of significant water bodies: a. Orient Harbor: 5 Lots on South Dyer and southern 3 lots on North Dyer b. Narrow River: 1 Lot on South Brown c. Long Island Sound: 5 Lots on North Brown and northern 3 Lots on North Dyer d. Munn Lake: Northern 3 Lots on North Dyer(also listed in c. Lon Island Sound above) The two main sources of Surface Water impact come from Stormwater Runoff and Wastewater Discharge. Reducing the density versus a Standard Subdivision has already eliminated 60% of the potential impact on surface water. Surface water impact will be an important factor in how we design our lots when they are developed in the future. Stormwater Runoff—Our proposed subdivision has been designed to minimize stormwater runoff impact. The proposed lot layout on our parcels retains natural vegetative buffers to protect/preserve ` . . wetlands, bluff and other sensitive areas. We are proposing only permeable surface right-of-ways and driveways on all parcels. We will develop a detailed Stormwater Management Control Plan in line with the Town Code (Chapter 236-18 attached) as part of the Final Subdivision Application process, i.e. protecting the site with hay bales, silt fencing and/or temporary vegetation/mulch, minimizing the impact of grading, excavation and filling, protecting natural drainage patterns, etc. Wastewater Discharge—The SCDHS Reclaim Our Water Septic Improvement Program (attached) cites nitrogen pollution from cesspools and septic systems as the single largest cause of degraded water quality.They calculate the average residential septic system discharges—40 pounds of nitrogen per year. In Robert L. Uebler, Ph.D Soil Scientist's report on "How a Conventional Ground Absorption Septic Tank System Treats Household Wastewater" (full report attached), it explains that when wastewater enters the septic tank, Nitrogen is present at 70 mg/I. When it leaves the septic system and enters the soil, Nitrogen is present at 40 mg/I.The soil treats the suspended solids through filtration and digestion by aerobic organisms. Most nitrogen is converted to ammonia in the septic tank.The ammonia is positively charged and attracted to negatively charged soil.The soil treatment impact dilutes the nitrogen to<10 mg/I,which is considered safe for reuse.This is the level of nitrogen that could be discharged into groundwater and ultimately reach surface water.The SCDHS establishes the standards to ensure septic systems are designed to match the assimilative capacity of the soil to treat wastewater in line with the amount of water coming from the house so the septic system does not fail and cause contamination. 13 We are proposing traditional septic systems for our 17 Iots.The Suffolk County Sanitary Code approves the use of individual sewerage systems for projects outside of Groundwater Management Zones III, V and VI;we are in Zone IV(Suffolk County Sanitary Code—Article 6, Chapter 760-608, B.1 a-d). We meet the additional requirements of minimum 20,000 s.f. lot size, and not being within an existing sewer district and we will comply with all other County and State requirements. Our 60% Density reduction would decrease the potential septic system discharge o soil from —1,680 pounds of nitrogen/year to T- 680 pounds. There are 678 House Units in Orient based on the 2009 Census. At full occupancy this would represent 27,120 pounds of annual nitrogen discharge to soil. At full occupancy our nitrogen discharge level of 680 pounds would represent a 2.5%increase to the nitrogen impact on surface water of the Long Island Sound, Munn Lake, Narrow River and Orient Harbor. The only USGS water analysis station in Orient is in Orient Harbor (Site 01304200). Based on USGS data collected from May 2017—April 2018 (the most recent 12 month period with data approved for publication)the Orient Harbor's Nitrogen level meets the EPA's 'Good' Ecological Criterion for 99.6% of the samples taken. See attached USGS Water Analysis Details. 5/1/17-4/30/18 USGS Orient Harbor Water Analysis—Nitrate,water, in situ, mg/I as nitrogen I (Daily Mean is used to evaluate overall classification by day) Total EPA Good<.1 mg/1 EPA Fair.1 to<.5 mg/1 EPA Poor>.5 Measure Days Samples Days Samples Days Samples Days Samples # 254 11332 253 11288 1 1 42 0 2 % 100% 100% 99.6% 99.6% 0.39% 0.37% 0% 0.02% Probability of occurrence of potential impacts The probability of potential impact on surface water is low since each future lot development will meet all requirements of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and the NYS Department of Environmental Control. We are not requesting any exceptions to these requirements and when we are ready to develop a specific lot, we will utilize the best practices and alternative technologies available at that time,that are proven effective in comparable situations, and that are not cost prohibitive. We intend to keep the property and lots within our family, and it is likely that lots will be developed over a long period of time and that most will be used as seasonal/vacation homes.This will further reduce the amount of nitrogen introduced into the water bodies in the area. i The nitrogen impact on nearby water bodies should beiminimal.Surface water impact from our lots would mainly impact the Long Island Sound and Orient Harbor. It is highly unlikely that the per year nitrogen discharge from the 3 northern lots on North Dyer and the 5 lots on North Brown to the Long Island Sound would affect overall nitrogen levels given the large size of this body of water (1,268 square miles with depths varying between 65-230 feet);and the high flushing rates of the eastern portion of the Long Island Sound. Since Munn Lake is brackish and is frequently overtopped by the Long Island Sound during storm events,the impact should be minimal and temporary.The Nitrogen impact on surface waters should be negligible from our!proposed 5 South Dyer and 3 southern lots on North Dyer, given the water volume of the Orient Harbor and its open connection to the larger Peconic 14 Estuary, and the lack of current nitrogen issues. We are only proposing one house lot that would impact Narrow River, so this should also have a negligible impact. r Mitigation of Surface Water Impact Already Taken Our proposed density reduction reduces our potential Surface Water impact by 60%. Further,the placement of our lots and the preserved acreage maintains natural vegetative buffers to protect wetlands,bluffs and the natural topography. In addition,we are proposing that all right-of-ways and driveways on our properties will be permeable surfaces.These things will help significantly with storm water runoff. Our Aquaculture operation on the South Dyer property has been reducing nitrogen and improving water quality in the Orient Harbor and the Peconic Bay since 2003.Our operation removes 23 pounds of Nitrogen from the water for every 10,000 oysters we ship (East Coast Shellfish Growers Association"Shellfish Culture is Good for the Environment").In 2017 we shipped over 700,000 oysters,representing 1,610 pounds of nitrogen elimination.This is more than double the maximum 680 pounds of Nitrogen we would discharge annually into groundwater and local water bodies for all 17 of our proposed lots. Since we started our aquaculture business we have shipped about 2,000,000 oysters,which has eliminated 4,600 pounds of nitrogen in the Orient Harbor/Peconic Bay.This is the equivalent of almost 7 years of the maximum discharge from our project. Our business has steadily grown over the last 17 years and we are committed to continuing the operation for the foreseeable future. c f 15 Impact on Groundwater Note:Several of the potentially moderate to large impact areas are being addressed together since the magnitude, importance, probability of occurrence and mitigation is virtually the same. EAF Part 2 Potential Moderate to Large Impact Water Supply/Demand/Quality and Wastewater Concerns. The Proposed action may... 1. require new water supply wells or create additional demand on supplies from existing wells 2. exceed safe and sustainable withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer 3. allow/result in residential uses in areas without water/sewer services. 4. include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater. 5. result in water supply wells where groundwater is, or is suspected to be, contaminated. 6. involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. Lead Agency Concern Areas • Availability of potable water, impacts on existing/future development on groundwater supply. • Sustainability of aquifer/Impact to adjacent property owners/parcels (zone of influences). • Threat of saltwater intrusion on existing and proposed private wells. • Determine impact on water supply demand of potable groundwater sources for each parcel location. • Provide calculations of the expected amount of water (in gallons per day) used for each residential structure, including areas proposed to be irrigated. Sustainability of the aquifer and impacts to adjacent parcels. Provide details about the aquifer �- (confined, sole source, geology replenishment source, freshwater depth, etc.). Please provide the number of private wells currently within 150' of each parcel and if the new private wells would impact the existing private wells. • Compliance with SCDHS regulations for wastewater gallons per day discharged to groundwater. • Current groundwater quality, contamination and potential impact. Include potential impact from new sanitary system,fertilizers, herbicides, Pharmaceuticals, personal care products.There are particular concerns with nitrates, perchlorate, 1,4-dioxane, PPCPs,VOCs and pesticides. Submit test well data, depth to groundwater,technology available to mitigate impacts. • Compliance with Storm Water Management Regulations (Chapter 236 of Southold Town Code) • Suffolk County Department of Health Services approvals will be required • Impacts of pesticides within 100 feet of potable drinking water, irrigation sources for lawn/crops. Magnitude, importance Overall-The proposed action is in an area that does not have public water or sewer services. It will require one new well and a sewage disposal system for each of the 17 house lots. Reducing the density versus a Standard Subdivision has already eliminated 25 (60%) of the potential new wells and septic systems needed.There are no immediate plans for developing lots and we expect it will be many years before all 17 would be developed; most would be seasonal/vacation properties. Impacts of Existing and Future Development On Ground Water Supply { Water Usage -_We expect the average water usage for our future households to be 200-300 gallons per day (gpd), including irrigation.This is based on USGS data (80-100 gpd per person), and the Grace 16 Communications Virtual Water Use Calculator and the Home Waterworks calculator. If all 17 lots were developed, the maximum consumption would be 5,100 gallons per day(17 lots x 300 gpd). Availability of Potable Water/Current Groundwater Quality—According to the Nassau Suffolk Water Commissioners Association's 2014-2018 report on "Our Long Island Aquifers:The Basics", Nassau and Suffolk counties obtain their drinking water from 3 major aquifers underlying Long Island, which constitute a sole source aquifer.The Upper Glacial aquifer is the shallowest and provides water to most areas of the Town of Southold, including Orient. The sole source of replenishment for the three aquifers is precipitation. The report goes on to state: "Our aquifers are among the USA's most prolific, containing an estimated 90 trillion gallons of fresh water.All Long Island aquifers receive their fresh water from precipitation, averaging some 44" of precipitation per annum". "Precipitation/snowmelt replenish more water than is pumped out annually..." r The Suffolk County Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan (3.1.2.9) states, "Water balances developed using the Main Body and East End groundwater flow models confirm that recharge greatly exceeds water supply pumping rates, and the County's aquifer system can continue to meet current and projected rates of water supply pumping on a County-wide basis". These two sources support that our project would not have a measureable impact on the existing and future ground water supply and therefore would not have an impact on the private or common wells adjoining our properties (zone of influences). The attached maps show all the private wells and septic systems we were able to identify via certified letters mailed August 1 and 3, 2016, and door-to-door canvassing on September 3, with an additional certified letter to those who didn't respond to earlier contact attempts. #Private Wells Within 150'Of Each Parcel (#lots within 150' of Private Wells) North DyerSouth Dyer North Brown South Brown Total 6 (3)* 16 (1)** 7 (0) 1 2 (0) 31 *Test wells> 150'from private wells for 2 lots; unknown private well location near 3rd lot ** Test well > 150'from any private well Saltwater Intrusion—Based on the Suffolk County Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan (3.4.1.3), "There are several areas of potential saltwater intrusions, primarily located on the North and South Forks, on Shelter Island, and in other coastal areas of the North Shore". "Saltwater intrusion is a relatively slow moving occurrence, with rates of advance generally in the tens of feet per year".The current recommendation is to monitor saltwater intrusion via outpost wells in each of the areas of potential future intrusion.There are no current intrusion areas mentioned and no recommendations being made beyond monitoring.This indicates that there is no evidence that our proposed project could cause saltwater intrusion either in our new wells or in nearby existing wells. The SCDHS has not established a Maximum contaminant level (MCL) for Sodium (Na) in their Water Analysis Standards.The Sodium levels in our test wells ranged from 11.6 to 59.5 mg/L. These levels are well below the 'moderately restricted' sodium diet level of 270 mg/L; 3 of our 9 test wells are below the 'severely restricted' sodium diet level of 20 mg/L. 17 Water Quality-SCDHS has completed water analysis from our test wells and all 4 parcels have met NYSDOH Drinking Water standards, including for VOCs, PPCP's and Pesticides. In fall 2016 we installed 6 test wells: 2 on North Brown, 1 on South Brown, 2 on South Dyer and 1 on North Dyer. In December 2016, SCDHS conducted water analysis for the test wells and one existing well on North Dyer. Final results were issued March 29, 2017. Nitrate levels from South Brown and the two South Dyer test wells met the NYSDOH standards, but exceeded the Suffolk County test well standards. Also, one of the South Dyer wells exceeded the drinking water standard for iron. As a result we were asked to install two additional test wells on South Dyer, which we did in late summer 2017 to minimize farm disruption. Water samples were taken in October 2017, and final results were issued February 20, 2018. All results met NYSDOH Drinking Water Standards and SCDHS test well standards. We were also requested to do another test well on South Brown, but we elected not to do this at the time since we could address the issue by installing a system to remove nitrate from the drinking water(i.e. ion exchange, distillation or reverse osmosis). These systems could also be used if future problems arise with VOCs, PPCPs or pesticides. Before we develop a lot on South Brown we will likely do an additional test well, but didn't feel the additional cost at this time was warranted. Complete Water Analysis results are attached. Depth to Groundwater Based on Test Well Static Water Level Parcel Test Well#(SCDHS Request#/Lot#) Depth to Groundwater North Dyer 1(PR16-0377/Lot#1) 16' 2 (PR16-0375/Lot#4) 18' 4 (PR16-0376/Lot#4) 14' 2 (PR16-0378/Lot#1) 10' South Dyer 3 (PR16-0378/Lot#2) 7' 1 (PR16-0376/Lot#4) 9' North Brown 1 (PR16-0373/Lot#1) 65' 2 (PR16-0372/Lot#5) 65' South Brown 1 (PR16-0374/Lot#1) 7' Wastewater Discharge—The SCDHS Reclaim Our Water Septic Improvement Program cites nitrogen pollution from cesspools and septic systems as the single largest cause of degraded water quality. They calculate the average residential septic system discharges—40 pounds of nitrogen per year. In Robert L. Uebler, Ph.D Soil Scientist's report on 'How a Conventional Ground Absorption Septic Tank System Treats Household Wastewater (attached), it explains Nitrogen is present at 70mg/L in wastewater entering the septic system. When it leaves and enters the soil, Nitrogen is present at 40 mg/I. The soil treats the suspended solids through filtration and digestion by aerobic organisms. Most nitrogen is converted to positively charged ammonia in the septic tank, which is attracted to negatively charged soil.The soil treatment impact dilutes nitrogen to<10 mg/I,which is considered safe for reuse. This is the level of nitrogen that could ultimately reach surface water.The SCDHS establishes standards to ensure septic systems perform in this safe manner. We are proposing traditional septic systems for our 17 lots.The Suffolk County Sanitary Code (Article 6, Chapter 760-608 B. 1 a-d) approves individual sewerage systems for projects outside of Groundwater Management Zones III,V and VI;we are in Zone IV. We meet additional requirements of minimum 18 20,000 s.f. lot size, and not being within an existing sewer district, and we will comply with all other County and State requirements. Our 60% Density reduction would decrease the potential septic system discharge to soil from 1,680 pounds of nitrogen/year to 680 pounds. There are 678 House Units in Orient based on the 2009 Census.At full occupancy this would represent 27,120 pounds of annual nitrogen discharge to soil.At full occupancy our nitrogen discharge level of 680 pounds would represent a 2.5%increase to the nitrogen impact. Our parcels are in Groundwater Management Zone IV.The SCDHS ha's established a Design Flow of 300 gpd for this Zone. Density for this Zone has been defined based on 40,000 s.f. lots.The SCDHS has determined the impact on water supply demand, sustainability of the aquifer, and wastewater discharge is acceptable at this level. Our project is based on density at the 80,000/200,000 s.f. lot size and then reducing the#of lots by 60%. On this basis, our level of impact on Water usage and wastewater discharge would be 22%of the SCDHS allowable level, a sizeable reduction in impact. Design Flow Comparison -#Lots(gpd water usage and wastewater discharge) Parcel(Zoning District) SCDHS Yield* Zoning Yield Prop.Cons. Sub.Yield North Dyer(R-80) 14(4200) 8(2400) 6(1800) South Dyer(R-80) 18(5400) 10(3000) 5 (1500) North Brown (R-80) 25 (7500) 14(4200) 5(1500) South Brown (R-80) 14(5200) 8(2400) 1(300) South Brown (R-200) 3 (900) 2 (600) -- Total 74(23,200) 42(12,600) 17(5100) * Based on 20,000 s.f.lots The Suffolk County Reclaim Our Waters program has 4 Surface Waters Contributing Area classifications regarding need for advanced wastewater treatment (see attached maps): • Priority#1 L,. Priority#2 • < 2 years Baseflow Contributing Areas to Surface Waters • 2-25 year Baseflow Contributing Areas to Surface Waters Our 4 parcels are in the<2 year or 2-25 year, lower priority classification areas. Probability of occurrence of potential impacts The probability of potential impacts is low because our proposed water usage,wastewater discharge system and discharge levels, and our design flow meet or exceed SCDHS requirements. The Suffolk County Water Resource Management plan indicates that there is adequate potable water supply for current and future demand in our locations and that there are no current saltwater incursion threats in our areas. With one exception, we have SCDHS approval for our Test Well analysis (water quality) and our Test Hole Soil analysis (suitability for conventional septic systems).The South Brown Nitrate level was within NYSDOH standards, but over the SCDHS test well standards.We can address the South Brown situation either by locating another test well site that meets all standards or by using filtration systems. Net,there is adequate potable water available, impact on the aquifer and adjacent areas is acceptable, and our wastewater systems are acceptable regarding groundwater impact. 19 Commercial Pesticide Concerns ^sMagnitude, importance -We have no pesticides outside of standards on any of our parcels based on " test well data. With-the exception-of the South-Brown testwell-location; we have test wells on South Dyer and North Brown that are more than 100'from active agriculture and we can place wells on all lots that would meet the 100' setback. We would need to confirm that any new wells would meet State and County standards, but this would take place at a later date after subdivision approval from the Town of Southold. Probability of occurrence of potential impacts There is low probability of impact since wells will be sited more than 100'from commercial pesticide application. Health Department approval is required for all wells, so there is low pesticide impact probability. We will also include the required Subdivision Best Management Practices for landscaping in HOA covenants/restrictions: • using native, drought-tolerant plants • Fertilizer applications o nitrogen, phosphorous, or potassium only between November 1-and April 1. o Lawn Fertilizer Applications: Only if more than 20' away from surface water or within 3' of a 10'+ vegetative border; or within 3' of surface water if the spreader has a guard deflector shield or is a drop spreader r ■ Only organic fertilizers where the water-soluble nitrogen is no more than 20% of the total nitrogen in the mixture may be utilized on the lots. ■ maximum of 1 pound of nitrogen per 1000 s.f. in any one application, with a cumulative application of no more than 2 pounds per 1000 s.f. per year ■ phosphorus containing lawn fertilizer is prohibited unless establishing a new lawn or soil test shows that the lawn does not have enough phosphorus. The phosphorous level must be 0.67 or lower unless a soil test indicates it's needed. ■ prohibited on impervious surfaces. Any applications or spills must be immediately picked up. ,. "Mitigation of.Gr6nndwater,Inipact Already'Taken Our proposed density reduction reduces our potential Surface Water impact by eliminating the need for 60% of the potential Wells and Wastewater systems. We are'only utilizing 22% of the water usage (gpd) and Wastewater discharge (gpd) allowable by the SCDHS. We have agreed to use the required Subdivision best practice for landscaping our lots. While our Aquaculture business does not directly link to Groundwater, eventually some nitrogen that is discharged to soil and reaches groundwater will ultimately reach surface water. This means that the benefits of our oysters removing Nitrogen from surface waters will also mitigate the impact of wastewater going to groundwater. 20 (f Impact on Flooding EAF Part 2 Potential Moderate to Large Impact The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage patterns. Lead Agency Concern Areas Sea level rise and the impact on low-lying areas of each parcel (located in the mapped flood zoned areas). Assessment of impacts and mitigation must be discussed. Magnitude, importance All proposed lots are in the FEMA moderate/low risk of annual chance of flooding areas FEMA Flood Zone Classification For Proposed House Lots North Dyer South Dyer North Brown South Brown # Lots 6 5 5 1 Approx. Lot Elevation 25'-50' S'-15' 65'-90' 5'-10' Mod/Low Risk(X) 100% 100% 100% 100% High Risk (AE) FEMA Maps attached: 1. ND: ( 2. SD: 36103C0068H 3. NB: 4. SB: Sketch Maps showing elevations attached: 1., ND 2. SD 3. NB 4. SB Probability of occurrence of potential impacts The probability of potential impacts is low since our lots are in zones classified by FEMA as moderate/low risk.The lot elevations for 14 of the 17 proposed lots are at 10' or above,which further lessens the flooding risk. Of the remaining lots,two are on SD: Lot 4 is-90% at 10'-15' and Lot 5 is -50%-at 10'-15'.The lot on South Brown is 100% between 5'-10'. When we are readyto develop any of the 3 lots in the lower elevation areas, we will implement the best practice drainage patterns/systems that are available at that time,that are proven effective in comparable situations, and that are not cost prohibitive. This should minimize the potential impact of any flooding or storm water run-off that could occur. 21 ILO JWI + 31 • 1 � i ---J (EL 14) iZONE VE CiFo (EL 16) ,f4 LIMIT OF MODERATE SAG LIMIT OF MODERATE WAVE ACTION Z �ZONE4VE �P�� ZONE AE Np0 -- I (EL 12) BIRDSEYE ROAD - Oe MDy eN 1r MAPLE LANE S , o, ZONE X x rn Z C m m A 0 a 0 • '�•��• .�•- LIMIT OF MODERATE LX0252X' rt .WAVE ACTION FEMA Map 36103CO068H North Dyer (basically south of Munn Lake) 50 1 ZONE X � ' � a Afl N�RD •w LIMIT OF MODERATE; �" x \ ti WAVE ACTION �o ZVNE A9E \ +� South Dyer � 6 a f . ZONE AE .w (EL 7) jP FEMA Map 36103CO068H South Dyer y 31 • �� J � LX0255 LX0256 LX0257 owtiy North Brown F 7 O s� 0 FEMA Map 36103C0068H North Brown (just east of Edwards Lane) 31 • 1 {� 8 ZONE AE,,- F[ - -,.....�.�, - South Brown ' y _ ZONE X •4' T►►�� n nf~' r- \�' ZONE'AE (EL 6) ` ►►u di old, '. 1 36081►3 ., ZONE X ZONE X FEMA Map 36103C0068H South Brown YIELD MAP NORTH DYER SITUATE ORIENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD x SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. TAX No. 1000-17-04-16 SCALE 1"=100' MAY 19, 2008 JUNE 23, 2011 YIELD MAP JUNE 27.2011 REVISED YIELD MR TOTAL AREA =921,631 sq ft 21.15 ac UPLAND AREA = 670,061 sq ft WETLANDS AREA= 251,570 sq ft. 1� 5.77 ac. —� /i'' UNE �`.`t� V'_ '�•,p;' - li _ £ 80,7,f4 sq. ft. > ,81.571 sq. ft lbs' ----------- - --2t9 { , X107115 ___ ____ _____ ---- q --_- _ _ 11L -- -------- � 1 P-S6 6072zh P+ ' LOLL 40,001 vi,ft IV 42 \� // LUT I B80,Q021sqq f}(/ it _ >• $ N 41• ` �orlE-- x to LOT 1 �l hs9• ` // 80,033 aq ft i 'x :. /za• NOTES, dJ y�p•� ry` 'b �f 1.ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N G V D 1929 DATUM EXISTING t° ELEVATIONS SHOWN om` `, i ��� We EXISTING CONTOURLINES ARESHOWN THUS:: ------------------ .�,f,. ��• ?4� 2.ZONING USE DISTRICT R-80 3. WETLAND AREA = 251,573 sq. ft. 41 /a`9/J /Afi 1 ry J Y.5 Lc.NO 50467 SUROMS70H REPORT(NORTH DYER) Nathan Taft Corwin III SUBDIVISION TYPE TOTAL AREA N011-eVll0eelF 9UItOA3tE C4LOEAIEO OEVLLOXY[MT EM BEpON[0 OP[N �`" ""EA aT x o. "`� .a ... °T��� Land Surveyor STANDARD 21 fS ae. 5.I7 ac IS 33 ac 11.36 X 4J,360 x 0.83/!0,000 )11 T 13.38«.%0.40 1153 60 ae i 1l,��4�w t1 so/e _813 75/)521.1!« STs I3�3« 13.]3%41,!80/80.000.83 0.l X OSS=.1 1133 s X Ob ISY«I.S4lz s =33.903µ1t u/2 $accessar!o Jlase A M94gw LS L5 CONSERVATION SM s 6fb Su.,Ns-SuDansrons- STe Plans- Cx+bucWn Iywl CONSERVATION Sl ism sT« Is.a«. 1138 x41580/80.000.a� 5 x ab. r SO)< =«i2a11j,«. Zwlµ plpryE(631)]2]-2090 fax(631)727-1727 0{)ICfS IDGIEp Xi IBOWl6 AININES$ 1536 P Rom Ytt It94] O Sox 13 JamnpaR.Nev JameeparL Ne.YOM1 1191) YIELD MAP _ ______ SOUTH DYER SITUATE SBO.44.40a 2ORIENT ---------- ----- 5Jq°• I TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -_-_ _- SJ6jq, - - 20f 742 SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK °*i4pel S.C. TAX No. 1000-17-06-14.2 i SCALE 1"=100' \ so,(SLODi ig ft •^. Bs4°`�o APRIL 1, 2011 . / , - �� ee• �d JUNE 23. 2011 YEILD MAP Jam\ 9 40• ��, AREA= 1,53sq. it F (To TIE U—) 35 34444 cc Lor N • 80,017 sq.'t 1 i LOT 8 . \ I 80,001 sq.ft. 111 1 €xp ♦ ♦ r�C 1 -------------- In R� C v LOT 7 1180,OL94Ta1 • • • • • � € /80,000 sq. fl �� q ft 5 • g< I �o o: 1 • • � I `I fryO • ` • <�� � ""_, , �III y.Q/ �J O" VG- lap2 • \ LOT 2 80,017 sq.ft. ya<tp • LOT 6 yy 80,000 sq. ft. Abr C r r 1 ��• � �ti X86• Q Q 11 a• `�� �w„a,0„w • /T80.0- LOT LOT 3 S I LbT 5 80,050 3q ft zq S♦9 rcy ' • 9�'^' 7/ /l�1 4 11. . • � 1 `0 56.654 Ila 1 1 ~ I � • 7 M I ... •4.yTM _ 56,634 sq. y • E 1 AREA TO BE ACHED TO S.C. T No. LOT 4 Aar �m4 g• 'E \1000-17 -14 3) 80,847 sq ft O'l I • • • • / I1__ y0 __yam,. 9,IQ ne Lme '/mac -s to tQ °°'/ Q Q N89'07'16*W 319 55' of �•� TQQ `.� 0 4S v (SklAAQr S � 0 w NOTES 1 ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N G V.D. 1929 DATUM EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS:3 EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS- -------- --------- , 2. ZONING USE DISTRICT R-80 0 3.WETLAND AREA= 638.161 sq it SUBDIVISION REPORT(SOUTH DYER) Nathan Taft Corwin III SUODIVISRkI TYPE TmALYlf -��a� wl�'� C401AAT[0 O[v[xOPYpI pEVF10xYBY1 MEOUMEO w[fl IPYW%IIYxB YIELD ..� SP•OT 1.T s.r Lwd Surveyor 20.H<c%DAO 1269 STANDARD a.•IM S3.Y a. 1463 a 10.69 9 a 30.69%•J.36%0.6/80,000=D.S> z 216 a. z ac =3x.060 q.fl Same«7.S-In y J I--Jr LS 7/]] Ja h A I—.LS ON !S-9l ec. 146 s T0.68 x. M69 x.3,360/BDAOD a Il] 113%03]- m'My%0'� 1068 a -S�>ec m/x _ C SERVATION -2J ea,mx w fl. 1—.rys—- Ste Pqv- 3 v1101x(631)727-209. F9.(631)727-1727 W ]S.lt a 146 a 2289 a 10.89%43,580/80.000 z Itd 11.3%OAD z 45 )7.641.a� 10.69 a-•.14 �"'^•°'o/♦ WCLS LO TFD AT N47MC ADDRESS C SERVATION IB.6 x •36,06)x0.N. 1386 Hain Road PO� 16 —W Nn yrk 11947 J--4..N..Yank 17947 G I51,X14D SOUND 9�;x6 s P. � ��N�.�;.,.°e-�°",,.,. 'sy e YEILD MAP LON spy;3s E �" 3 pd� NORTH BROWN LOTS SITUATE ORIENT J -- ; TOWN OF LD ------ =„_;j� _ ,e �¢ SUFFOLK COUNTYTY,, NEW YORK ------ - 5 C TAX No. 1000-18-03-30.3 ' 00% R �,`f1 SCALE 1"=100' i lOr ¢al APRIL 1, 2011 op'� Iq�OgT JUNE 2S 2D11 VELD xAR In¢1 IB iT vc aq N %Z+�0 A iaJ�I Off` blL�2pyl / ! O^ 9C92� NOI EI-EV E EI- ENIIONS ARE NNTO 1939 DATUu 'Y p0��� ', �'•'+v -" • "e Y EMISTIING CONTOUR ARE WN TH LINES ARE SHOWN THUS, m C I I r Z ZONING USE DISTRICT R-80 S eLUfE PPG=90,019 vv It . I WOODED • LOT 3 � q i 81.162 aq R_, l""___ 0 _ sf1HOMSlON R—,W.——C-) \ y. r'y. �e ryirmuo nre ,vrn ,°mn LOT,'4 wa.,°nc eA.,/woa.n, I, :°18ir°m°.'0 .,w,., •'�'in'w,i mlu (` 80,020 qq It ( pP m(,a"N,. ° ,m.. u°°... nuanew/enem.,.° •o,.. ./ir:.i° -U, . n LOT 5 -- I' ':i• ;d�i 60.066'x9 11 M10 //S ' ED/WOODLOT b' 99606 1 ! '$I/ 80�008'aq if I 9 LOT"T;/• /e //��� ! 4 'iILirvATEO lu, LOT J1 j 80,016 eq It �+ LOT 9/ k ' 80,008 s9/it LOT 10 80,002 eq it \ i --------------- LOT =-- --- m u---' LOT 11 801007 Aq ft -------- C-ED _-- ` CULTNATEO M. y env� m�M1mxun 4 11 i I M1�00 GS Ry Shy qO y 7 LOT 12 m "176,660 aq it >a�y o ------ mTv oo;o+ o840.,\W 6yo0 Nathan Taft Corwin III °J� S 6q 245 Land Surveyor M1 5g w,�culn=.-� rm conn,-I>:, P• YIELD MAP SOUTH BROWN SITUATE ORIENT _ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK 26 y61 AS!s\ S.0 TAX No 1000-18-06-173 8 n� SCALE 1'=100' y0'E�,K +• s APRIL 1,2011 ¢p P9 N 6x19 a f'a JUxE v zorr 1vEo Lur ZI.PIty °` s m� � Axu=L rn ss6 i w N 61q'S Ku' `�Pa'o•'aab�°. ++a as a t £ XOI£S¢EVAl10r6 ARC —E CED TONG V D t Nu P o� Eiomxc¢EVAnoxs Au sxowx Txus m ' f Eusnxc coxr6uN uxcs AxE sxawx mus--sa-- 2°° aamnrzD rm 2.2oxwG usE Drsm as 1J BO WIN-Q. ]69a a9 Ir ,s c @ 6 wErw+6 .z ay rr ��m, \a6r w LOT I n W s 60 Si 10 f Lm 6 AE u9 m a9 n F OLE 1-1141 r - Sa Z 4 \\ y`L 'v12 1 rN It T h� QO i f� an ¢u �E mil� �/��u� .m .u,� .�' ,m'au»n.a~ �� aurvnrtn wn �`�_� ° ���• ym j 6m /. h � 7 a /. 4. h c Nathan Taft Corwin III Land Surveyor Impact on Plants and Animals F 5 EAF Part 2 Potential Moderate to Large Impact The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by any rare, threatened or endangered species,as listed by New York State or the federal government. Lead Agency Concern Areas • Presence or absence of protected species and potential impacts (if any)to such species or habitat as determined by the New York State Natural Heritage Program. Magnitude/importance - Full NY State Natural Heritage Program report is attached—4 Pages The NY State Natural Heritage Program stated that they, "cannot provide a definitive statement as to the presence or absence of all rare or state-listed species or significant natural communities. Depending on the nature of the project and the conditions at the project site, further information from on-site surveys or other sources may be required to fully assess impacts on biological resources". There was only one recently documented (2003-07-10) rare plant, Scotch Lovage, in the vicinity of the project area. It was found in the Narrow River Road Nature Trail in a low-grade coastal oak-hickory forest near the headwaters of a short tidal river. There were 11 other rare plants and one rare animal, documented in 1944 or earlier, and there is uncertainty regarding their continued presence. In most cases the precise location of the plant or animal at the time of the documentation is also unknown. Probability of occurrence of potential impacts There is low probability that any of the rare/endangered species-- 12 plants and one animal-- are present in the area covered by the proposed subdivision. Even if one or more of these species would be present, it is very unlikely that any of their habitats would be disturbed since they would normally be found in areas classified unbuildable based on the habitat data on the New York Natural Heritage Program website (acris.nynhp.org). The most common habitats are wetlands, marshes, cliffsides—all unbuildable areas. The New Jersey Pine Barrens Tiger Beetle is not even listed in the NY DEC database. Further, in a 2006 'Bugguide' posting by Daniel P. Duran,Assistant Teaching Professor Department of Biodiversity Earth & Environmental Science, at Drexel University, "Cicindela patrela consentanea-is now only found in a few counties in the NJ Pine Barrens. "Therefore the proposed action will likely have no/small impact on this species. 22 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Division of Fish,Wildlife and Marine Resources New York Natural Heritage Program 625 Broadway,5th Floor,Albany,New York 122334757 Phone: (518)402-8935•Fax: (518)402-8925 Website:www.dec.ny.gov September 16,2015 Carol Tuthill Re: Proposed 80/60 Conservation Subdivision Open Development Area covering—112 acres at 21505, 21920,and 26975 Rte.25,and 7685 and 8070 Narrow River Rd. Town/City:Southold. County: Suffolk. Dear Carol Tuthill: In response to your recent request,we have reviewed the New York Natural Heritage Program database with respect to the above project. Enclosed is a report of rare or state-listed animals and plants,and significant natural communities that our database indicates occur,or may occur,on your site or in the immediate vicinity of your site. Note also that the Orient Harbor Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat(SCFWH),Long Beach Bay SCFWH,and Long Beach Bay Tidal Wetlands Area are adjacent to your site. For most sites,comprehensive field surveys have not been conducted,the enclosed report only includes records from our database.We cannot provide a definitive statement as to the presence or absence of all rare or state-listed species or significant natural communities.Depending on the nature of the project and the conditions at the project site,further information from on-site surveys or other sources maybe required to fully assess impacts on biological resources. Our database is continually growing as records are added and updated.If this proposed project is still under development one year from now,we recommend that you contact us again so that we may update this response with the most current information. The presence of the plants and animals identified in the enclosed report may result in this project requiring additional review or permit conditions.For further guidance,and for information regarding other permits that may be required under state law for regulated areas or activities(e.g.,regulated wetlands),please contact the appropriate NYS DEC Regional Office,Division of Environmental Permits,as listed at www.dec.nygov/about/39381.html. Sincerely, Andrea Chaloux Environmental Review Specialist 975 New York Natural Heritage Program _ New York Natural Heritage Programjj Report on Rare Animals,Rare Plants, and I Significant Natural Communities The following rare plants, rare animals, and significant natural communities have been documented in the vicinity of your project site. We recommend that potential onsite and offsite impacts of the proposed project on these species or communities be addressed as part of any environmental assessment or review conducted as part of the planning, permitting and approval process, such as reviews conducted under SEQR Field surveys of the project site may be necessary to determine the status of a species at the site,particularly for sites that are currently undeveloped and may still contain suitable habitat.Final requirements of the project to avoid,minimise,or mitigate potential impacts are determined by the lead permitting agency or the government body approving the project. The following plants are listed as Endangered or Threatened by New York State,and/or are considered rare by the New York Natural Heritage Program,and so are a vulnerable natural resource of conservation concern. COMMONNAME SCIENTIMCNAME NYSTATEMSTING HERITAGE CONSERMTIONSTOW Vascular Plants Scotch Lovage Ligusticum scothicum ssp. Endangered Critically Imperiled in NYS scothicum Narrow River Road Nature Trail, 2003-07-10:This plant is located in a low grade coastal oak-hickory forest located near 10763 the headwaters of a short tidal river.The forested area does have many non-native plants and there is some trash ^, scattered within the site.The narrow trail leading to the forest is seldom used as numerous shrubs were dosing the trail in. The trail loops through the coastal forest. This report only includes records from the NY Natural Heritage database.For most sites,comprehensive field surveys have not been conducted,and we cannot provide a definitive statement as to the presence or absence of all rare or state-listed species.Depending on the nature of the project and the conditions at the project site, further information from on-site surveys or other sources may be required to fully assess impacts on biological resources. If any rare plants or animals are documented during site visits,we request that information on the observations be provided to the New York Natural Heritage Program so that we may update our database. Information about many of the rare animals and plants in New York,including habitat,biology,identification,conservation,and management,are available online in Natural Heritage's Conservation Guides at www.guides.nynhp.org,from NatureServe Explorer at www.natureserve.org/explorer,and from USDA's Plants Database at http://plants.usda.govrndex.html(for plants). Information about many of the natural community types in New York,including identification,dominant and characteristic vegetation, distribution,conservation,and management,is available online in Natural Heritage's Conservation Guides at www.guides.nynhp.org. For descriptions of all community types,go to www.dec.ny.gov/animals/97703.html for Ecological Communities of New York State. 9/16/2015 Page 1 of 1 New York Natural Heritage Program 4 Report on Historical Records of Rare Animals, Rare Plants, and Natural Communities The following rare plants and rare animals have historical records at your project site, or in its vicinity. The following rare plants and animals were documented in the vicinity of the project site at one time,but have not been documented there since 1979 or earlier,and/or there is uncertainty regarding their continued presence. There is no recent information on these plants and animals in the vicinity of the project site and their current status there is unknown.In most cases the precise location of the plant or animal in this vicinity at the time it was last documented is also unknown. If suitable habitat for these plants or animals is present in the vicinity of the project site,it is possible that they may still occur there.We recommend that any field surveys to the site include a search for these species, particularly at sites that are currently undeveloped and may still contain suitable habitat. COMMONNAME SCIENHFICNAME NYSLISTMG HERMA GE CONSER VA77ONSTA TUS Beetles New Jersey Pine Barrens Cicindela patruela Unlisted Historical Records Only in NYS Tiger Beetle consentanea and Globally Rare 1944-10-02:Orient. 8424 Vascular Plants Marsh Fimbry Fimbristylis castanea Threatened Imperiled in NYS 1938-08-25:Orient Point.Specimen labels:Salt marsh. 48 Large Grass-leaved Rush Juncus biflorus Endangered Critically Imperiled in NYS 1928-08-01:Orient.Marsh. 4290 Coastal Silverweed Argentina egedii ssp. Threatened Imperiled in NYS groenlandice 1924-07-14:Orient.Specimen label:Salt marsh. 13859 Short-fruit Rush Juncus brachycarpus Endangered Critically Imperiled in NYS 1940-07-30:Orient.Moist meadow. 8003 Woodland Agrimony Agdmonia rostellata Threatened Imperiled in NYS 1932-08-22:Orient. 8453 Golden Dock Rumex fueginus Endangered Critically Imperiled in NYS 1926-10:Orient. 6116 Page 1 of 2 COMMONNAME SCIENTIFICNAA E NYSLISUNG HERMAGECONSERVATIONSTATUS l� Marsh Straw Sedge Carex hormathodes Threatened Imperiled in NYS 1926-06-01:Orient.Open marsh,wet places. 9734 Scotch Lovage Ligusticumscothicumssp. Endangered Critically ImperiledinNYS scothicum 1980-07-11:Orient 10023 Sea=pink Sabatia stellads Threatened Imperiled in NYS 1910-09-19-Orient Point. 9213 Seaside Bulrush Bolboschoenus maritimus Threatened Imperiled in NYS ssp.paludosus 1913-07-29:Orient Specimen label:Salt marshes. 13M Straw Sedge Carex straminea Endangered Critically Imperiled in NYS 1921-06-15:Orient Specimen label:Brackish marsh. 13354 Small-flowered Pearlwort Sagina decumbens ssp. Endangered Critically Imperiled in NYS decumbens 1910-06-20:Orient Point. 2746 This report only includes records from the NY Natural Heritage database.For most sites,comprehensive field surveys have not been conducted,and we cannot provide a definitive statement as to the presence or absence of all rare or state-listed species.Depending on the nature of the project and the conditions at the project site,further information from on-site surveys or other sources may be required to fully assess impacts on biological resources. If any rare plants or animals are documented during site visits,we request that information on the observations be provided to the New York Natural Heritage Program so that we may update our database. Information about many of the rare animals and plants in New York,including habitat,biology,identification,conservation,and management,are available online in Natural Heritage's Conservation Guides at www.guides.nynhp.org,from NatureServe Explorer at www.natureserve.org/explorer,and from USDA's Plants Database at http://plants.usda.govriindex.htmi(for plants). Page 2 of 2 Impact on Agricultural Resources ff 1.The proposed action may impact NYS Land Classification Soil Group 1 through 4 _ Lead Agency Concern Areas- Impact to prime farmland soils and soils of statewide importance, including agricultural areas converted to residential use. Magnitude, importance -The proposed action has 69 acres of Soil Groups 1-4. About 10 of these (14%)would be converted to residential use and 6 of the 10 are currently farmed (10%of current agriculture and aquaculture area). See attached Impact on Soil Portfolio (1Page) and 4 Soil Maps. Proposed Action Buildable Area Impact By Soil Group--Acres Soil ND SD NB SB Total Group Total Impact Total Impact Total Impact Total Impact Total Impact 1 9.6 5.1 7.7 0.5 22.7 0.4 40.0 6.0 2 7.2 3.4 0.1 0.1 10.7 0.1 3 7.3 2.7 1.7 6.2 .3 3.4 0.8 18.6 3.9 4 0.01 1 0.01 0.0 - Sub-Tot, 7.3 2.7 18.5 5.1 17.3 1.0 26.2 1.2 69.4 10.0 5 8.0 2.8 9.0 4.2 17.0 7.0 Total 15.3 5.5 18.5 5.1 26.3 5.1 26.2 1.2 86.4 17.0 Probability of occurrence of potential impacts-At completion 14%of land with Soil Groups 1-4 and 10%of farmland will be converted to residential use. It will likely take many years before this occurs. Mitigation of impact on Farmland and prime soils already taken The proposed subdivision will preserve 80%of Buildable Land and reduce density by 60%, which greatly reduces impact on prime soils and farmland. We further preserved 6.3 acres of prime soil and farmland through transfer of development rights and placement of 5 lots in a wooded area. • SB-We saved 2.5 acres of SB Soil Group 1 farmland, by moving 3 lots from SB to ND Soil Group 5, which is not currently farmed. We placed the remaining lot on SB in Soil Group 3 (poorest soil present on that site),which saves 0.92 acres of better soil for agriculture. • NB- Placing 5 NB lots in wooded Group 5 soil area saves 3.8 acres of farmland/prime soil. • SD-5 lots and access road use prime soil in active agriculture, but minimize view impact. Additional potential mitigation (further study is required to determine feasibility) NB-3.8 acres of currently wooded Soil Group 3 could potentially be reclaimed for farmland. This could bring the total reduction in farmland to 2.2 acres,-4%of total. SD-There is some potential to increase the size of the Aquaculture operation in the future. 2.The proposed action may sever, cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture,vineyard, orchard, etc.). Lead Agency Concern Areas-Potential impacts to access agricultural lands and any mitigation that has been achieved in the proposed Conservation Subdivision identified and/or proposed. 23 Magnitude, importance, probability of potential impacts The proposed roads do not sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land. It will likely take many years to develop all the lots. Mitigation of impact already taken The proposed 25' roads are formed by widening and improving the current unpaved farm roads. The new roads will continue to be used for agricultural purposes as well as residential traffic. Clustering the lots mitigates interruption of farm practices. 3.The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of active agricultural land. Lead Agency Concern Areas-Potential loss of agricultural lands/soils; mitigation achieved by proposed Conservation Subdivision. Magnitude, importance, probability of potential impacts There are 6 acres of agricultural lands/soils that will be converted to residential use.There will be some excavation and soil compaction in the construction areas. Mitigation of impact The proposed subdivision preserves 80%of Buildable Land and reduces density by 60%, which greatly reduces impact of excavation and compaction. We plan to move any of the Group 1-4 soils excavated to NB agricultural areas. Best practices will be utilized to minimize excavation and soil compaction. 4.The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural uses, either more than 2.5 acres if an Agricultural District... Lead AgenW Concern Areas Assessment on the severity of impacts to the Agricultural District.The mitigation resulting from the Conservation Subdivision and amount of land area preserved should be considered. Magnitude, importance, probability of potential impacts The proposed action will convert 6 acres of agricultural land to residential use.This represents 10%of currently farmed land. South Dyer, North Brown and South Brown are within an Agricultural District and therefore must meet the Type 1 threshold regarding the number of allowable lots. In our case,the threshold is 12.5 and we meet the requirement with a total of 11 lots on the 3 affected parcels. Proposed Action Agriculture Impact - #Acres (Excludes 5 Aquaculture Acres,which are unaffected) ND SD NB SB Total Current 0 20.7 12.0 20.1 52.8 Proposed 0 15.9 12.0 18.9 46.8 Difference 1 0 1 -4.8 0 1 -1.2 1 -6.0 For details, see attached Impact of Project Completion on Land Use. 24 Mitigation of impact already taken— The proposed subdivision will preserve 80%of Buildable Land and reduce density by 60%,which will greatly reduce the impact on agricultural land. We further preserved 6 acres of prime soil and farmland through transfer of development rights and the placement of 5 lots in a wooded area. Additional potential mitigation (further study is required to determine feasibility) NB-3.8 acres of currently wooded Soil Group 3 could potentially be reclaimed for farmland.This could bring the total reduction in farmland to 2.2 acres, —4%of total. SD—There is some potential to increase the size of the Aquaculture operation in the future. S.The proposed action may result, directly or indirectly, in increased development potential or pressure on farmland. Lead Agency Concern Areas-The potential impact to directly increase development Magnitude, importance The proposed action entails the construction of 17 houses and associated roads/infrastructure. It will create short-term employment opportunities for people involved in the construction, but no on-going employment. The lots will likely be developed one at a time over many years, so the normal workforce availability should be able to accommodate the construction needs.The number of people who would likely live in these 17 houses would not justify creating new stores or services in the area. The proposal does not involve extending any existing roads, sewers or water mains, so no secondary development would be enabled. Probability of occurrence of potential impacts Source Information:Town of Southold Full Demographic Inventory for the Comprehensive Plan If all 17 lots were developed,the total increase in population would likely be about 37-41 people, based on the average household size of Orient and Southold Town, respectively. We expect it will be many years before all 17 proposed lots would be developed, so there would be only a very gradual increase in population. We expect most of the houses would be summer residences. This further diminishes the chance that new stores or services would be needed. 6.The proposed project is not consistent with the municipal Farmland Protection Plan Lead Agency Concern Areas-Consistency with the Southold Town Farm and Farmland Protection Strategy(2000) and Community Preservation Project Plan (2008) Magnitude, importance and probability of occurrence of potential impacts Since the proposed action is for an 80/60 Conservation Subdivision, it will reduce density by 60% and preserve 80% (71 acres) of Buildable area plus an additional 25 acres of Wetlands and Bluff area.The proposed project preserves 90%of actively farmed land,with potential for further mitigation. This seems very consistent with the intent of both the Farmland Protection Strategy and the Community Preservation Project Plan. 25 Proposed Action Impact on Soil Portfolio--Acres Soil Soil North Dyer South Dyer North Brown South Brown Total Type Grade Curr Prop Curr Prop Curr Prop Curr Prop Curr Prop Buildable Area HaA 1 9.6 5.1 7.7 0.5 22.7 0.4 40.0 6.0 HaB 2 4.0 3.4 0.1 0.1 7.5 0.1 SdA 2 3.2 3.2 SdB 3 3.4 0.8 3.4 0.8 MfB 3 7.3 2.7 1.7 3.8 0.2 12.8 2.9 RdA 3 2.4 0.1 2.4 0.1 RBB 4 0.0 0.0 Subtotal 1-4 7.3 2.7 18.S 5.1 17.3 1.0 26.2 1.2 69.4 10.0 MfC 5 8.0 2.8 9.0 4.2 17.0 7.0 Subtotal 1-5 15.4 5.5 18.5 5.1 26.3 5.1 26.2 1.2 86.4 17.0 PIC 7 0.1 0.1 CpE 8 0.3 0.3 Tm 10 0.9 0.9 Subtotal 1-10 15.4 5.5 19.4 5.1 26.7 5.1 26.2 1.2487.7 17.0 Unbuildable Area HaA 1 1.3 1.3 SdB 3 0.0 MfC 5 1.2 1.2 PIC 7 0.8 0.8 BC 9 1.4 1.3 0.5 3.2 Tm 1 10 3.1 13.4 0.7 17.2 Subtotal 5.8 0.0 15.9 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.7 0.0 23.7 0.0 Total 21.2 5.5 35.3 1 5.1 28.0 1 5.1 26.9 1.2 111.4 17.0 Soil type 2015-10-13 by parcel .xlsx Last Revised 1/24/16 FRS 1P NIAP FOR NORTH DYER ;ITUATe Ot21L�T TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YC S.C. TAX No. 1000-17-04— SCALE 1"=100' - - - JUNE 23. 20T4 10TAL AREA=921.631 AR.ft lsse a -Ell"-S ANE-a 251.770, It. 5 77 Re. 0 C 5):: mm � z (3) 1 > i NMC (5) j A- A 0r7lELEVATOV.ARE R[1EREr 10 w r.v 0 ,929 0atuu O-MG[L[vAl— AR[s—. ' - EA1SIR CMCUR L+RES ARE StKYAW i JS. __- z zaww;rs[csrincr.R-s7 S.RI[lUNO AREA_tf 1.573,ff. k` A AREAS 0r 15%CR CREAT[R SL-91 'T S.[L00'J ZONE R10Ry11:04 TAKEN I 1 i STAND fB \ HaB (2) Tm SdA 10) HaA WETLANDS,-.. . �1) le Jl r � / ,r uCr�.M -. souwowunmw U �o •ts'D ' 1"HSAII kLW FOR NORT❑ IIROWN LO'l:ti 1,0 �p � /' pITDATA' "io.i? 'IkSIS /- Ohll:OU TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY. NEW YORK S.C. TAX No 1000—I9-03—SO.S SCALC 1".100' JUNL 23, 2014 - ..__ +ru�to iii iee•� r .. r xIKxIMt[b r0 •lux CVKi�NC[11vtMxi•xl SIWi'x ix ' I CCKrlxu COxtCui anti•11[lxowx Inui� i MCIM W W I U ^^�Cx/ n I MI•i M Ix Oe • IIII.:LCP[i ... ' 0 I[WU 1Uxl M ' .•jIj a �.vr i i. w S• ^r•O 1\ �JIv JnJ. CPE 9�*�ry1 I �Ja•h t ` r c 'ti ;r r gt��Si s s9 a°y oo .a Nathan Ta •;to Land S Mx�YIIa w Y It . cz, mss$. ERSAI' MAI' FOR tOt-TIT DROAY mr 1 rG ORIF'N I' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD _ SUFFOLK COUNTY. NEW YORK 5 C TAX N. 1000-16-06-17 3 31s>^ ,CALF 1'=100" UNE 23 .Ota t� ,10 � ISU Ynnt ,e ] S.r• _ M_� u sxow nus. -- r Y. t a. rya's SdB(3) SdB(3) 10)- e HaA(1) - r: b Nathan Taft Corwin III a Land Surveyor Impact of Project Completion on Land Use Total Lot Size Max Lot Area That Can Be: Use of Proposed Lots and Roadway Acres--Current and After Project Completion Cleared(50%) Bldgs/Aux 20% Vegetate,Non Agri Agricultural Forrested Bldgs,Paved Surfc. Unvegetated ND S.F. Acres S.F. Acres S.F. Acres Curr. Prop. Curr. Prop. Curr. Prop. Curr. Prop. Curr. Prop. Lot 1 32,345 0.74 16,173 0.37 6469.0 0.15 0.62 0.59 0.12 0.15 Lot 2 33,713 0.77 16,857 0.39 1 6742.6 0.15 0.77 0.62 0.15 Lot 3 39,064 0.90 19,532 0.45 7812.8 0.18 0.27 0.90 0.45 0.18 Lot 4 35,552 0.82 17,776 0.41 7110.4 0.16 0.24 0.82 0.41 1 0.16 Lot 5 31,740 0.73 15,870 0.36 6348.0 0.15 0.22 0.73 0.36 0.15 Lot 6 38,159 0.88 19,080 0.44 7631.8 0.18 0.26 0.88 0.44 0.18 Total 6 Lots 210,573 4.83 105,287 2.42 42114.6 0.97 1.40 2.21 0.00 0.00 3.32 1.66 0.12 0.97 0.00 0.00 R-O-W 29,321 0.67 29,321 0.67 29,321 0.67 0.34 0.34 0.67 ND Total 239,894 5.51 134,608 3.09 71,436 1.64 1.73 2.21 0.00 0.00 3.32 1.66 0.12 0.97 0.34 0.67 SD Lot 1 38,271 0.88 19,136 0.44 7654.2 0.18 0.70 0.88 0.18 Lot 2 40,685 0.93 20,343 0.47 8137.0 0.19 0.75 0.93 0.19 Lot 3 40,685 0.93 20,343 0.47 8137.0 0.19 0.75 0.93 0.19 Lot 4 39,978 0.92 19,989 0.46 7995.6 0.18 0.73 0.92 0.18 Lot 5 38,552 0.89 19,276 0.44 7710.4 0.18 1 0.71 0.89 1 0.18 Total 5 Lots 198,171 4.55 99,086 2.27 39634.2 0.91 0.00 3.64 4.55 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.00 0.00 R-O-W 21,783 0.50 21,783 0.50 21,783 0.50 0.50 0.25 1 0.25 SD Total 219,954 5.05 120,869 2.77 61,417 1.41 0.00 3.64 5.05 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.00 0.25 NB Lot 1 36,374 0.84 18,187 0.42 7274.8 0.17 0.25 0.84 0.42 0.17 Lot 2 31,131 0.71 15,566 0.36 6226.2 0.14 0.21 0.71 0.36 0.14 Lot 3 34,233 0.79 17,117 0.39 6846.6 0.16 0.24 0.79 0.39 0.16 Lot 4 32,825 0.75 16,413 0.38 6565.0 0.15 0.23 0.75 0.38 0.15 Lot 5 31,198 0.72 1%599 0.36 6239.6 0.14 0.21 0.72 0.36 0.14 Total 5 Lots 165,761 3.81 82,881 1.90 33152.2 0.76 0.00 1.14 0.00 0.00 3.81 1.90 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.00 R-O-W 57,300 1.32 57,300 1.32 57,300 1.32 0.79 0.48 0.52 0.00 0.84 NB Total 223,061 5.12 140,181 3.22 90,452 2.08 0.00 1.14 0.79 0.48 4.33 1.90 0.00 0.76 0.00 1 0.84 SB Total 1 Lot 40,004 0.92 20,002 0.46 8000.8 0.18 0.73 0.92 0.18 Driveway 14190 0.33 14,190 0.33 14190 0.33 0.33 0.33 SB Total 54,194 1.24 34,192 0.78 22,191 0.51 0.00 0.73 1.25 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 Total Lots 614,509 14.11 307,255 7.05 122,902 2.82 1.40 7.72 5.47 0.00 7.12 3.56 0.12 2.82 0.00 0.00 Total R-O-W 122,594 2.81 .122,594 2.81 122,594 2.81 0.34 0.00 1.62 1.06 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 1.76 TOTAL 737,103 17 307,255 7 245,496 6 1.73 7.72 7.09 1.06 7.65 3.56 0.12 2.82 0.34 1.76 Land Use Project Impact.xlsx Last Revised 1/24/16 Impact on Aesthetic Resources Note:All 5 areas of potentially moderate to large impact are being addressed together since the magnitude, importance, probability of occurrence and mitigation is virtually the same for all. Areas of Concern—The proposed action may... 1. be visible from officially designated federal, state, or local scenic or aesthetic resources. 2. result in the obstruction,elimination or significant screening of designated scenic views. 3. be visible from publicly accessible vantage points, seasonally and year round. 4. be viewed during:a) routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work; b) recreational or tourism based activities. 5.cause diminishment of public enjoyment/appreciation of designated aesthetic resource. Lead Agency Concern Areas-Address South Dyer impacts in regard to... • aesthetic resources and scenic view sheds important to the community,travellers, tourists/recreational participants using Route 25 and Orient Harbor • siting and scale of the 5 single family homes Magnitude importance and probability of occurrence of potential impacts The proposed action on South Dyer will be visible year round by local residents,tourists and recreational visitors from the Route 25 NYS Scenic Byway and the Orient Harbor.The proposed action consists of 5 single-family residences that will be located at the east side of the property,4 of which are recessed in a niche that borders the backs of the houses on Oysterponds Lane. This is the least visible part of the property and would at most be in the distant background or on the margin of the photos and paintings that are taken of the view from our property. Since we are not planning any development in the foreseeable future,the size/design of future houses is very speculative. When we do develop SD lots,we will fully comply with zoning requirements,which would be in keeping with other waterfront homes in Orient. At the Town's request we developed a worst-case visual impact study.This necessitated using hypothetical houses, so we used houses that can be found in/near the Orient Historic District and 'adjusted'them with computer modeling to maximize the profiles visible to the public. It is not our intent or desire to build these specific houses. The complete report is included in Tab 12. Importance of potential impacts Route 25 is part of the North Fork Trail, which is designated as a New York Scenic Byway.The NYS Scenic Byways application stated......Perhaps the road's most dramatic scenic offering is in one of these spots, a site where Orient Harbor can be seen to the southeast and Dam Pond to the north, featuring tidal marshes, distant water-front housing and a popular farmstand. "The popular farmstand cited is Latham's Farmstand,which is on SD at the western property boundary. Our proposed houses would be on the east boundary and form a continuation of the distant water-front housing that provides an interesting background for the spectacular water views. The definition of a scenic view is very personal and subjective, however,there are ways to describe/define it. The Town of Southold's Scenic Corridor Management Plan, Section 2.1 Byway ` Character:Scenic Landscape states: 26 "In Southold,topography is not a defining condition. Rather, scenic quality comes from a variety of elements working in concert. Like a musical composition, Southold's scenic corridors present variations on a few basic themes: historic hamlets,farmland vistas, Open Water, and lush vegetation. Moving along a road, a driver or cyclist experiences complex combinations and contrasts of these themes. Where in music, drama is provided through harmonic tension and release, in Southold roads such as Route 25 use visual compression and expansion. The driver's field of view narrows through hamlets or stands of old trees,then suddenly opens with an expansive view of farmland or water." We have a history of maintaining and enhancing our scenic properties as evidenced by people who stop to enjoy the view on SD. We regularly have artists come to paint or photograph. Visitors travelling by car, bicycle or on foot stop to take photos.There are several popular'coffee table' books that feature the SD view i.e.: • Long Island A Scenic Discovery, by Steve Dunwell - pp 40-41 Dawn at Truman Beach • North Fork Living by Harry Haralambou—1) p 166 Orient (a view of the Osprey nest on the South Dyer beach with Tidal Creek in foreground and the Peconic Bay and Shelter Island in Background); 2) p 131 Orient (a view of the Tidal Creek on South Dyer, looking west) • Between Sea and Sky by Jake Rajs—p. 99 Latham's Farm Stand on our South Dyer Property; p. 154 Orient (from the Tidal Creek looking East with South Dyer in the background) Probability of occurrence of potential impacts We do not have any specific plans or timelines for building the houses on South Dyer and it is likely that there will be several years between the developments of each house lot. Our intent is to keep the lots in the family and if any descendant wants to sell a lot, the Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company or any other direct Tuthill descendant will have first refusal right to buy the lot. Houses that we build on South Dyer would meet all zoning and building code requirements. We intend the houses to represent the character of the waterfront homes in Orient,to provide a good transition to the Historic District and be attractive to local residents and visitors to the area.The houses would not obstruct, eliminate or significantly screen the view.The typical photographs and paintings of the view rarely show any part of the area where the houses would be located, except as distant background. As with most subjective, personal perspectives,there will be a few individuals who feel our future houses diminish their enjoyment of the area, but we feel they would be in the minority. Mitigation of visual impact of South Dyer already taken Originally we were planning to do a Standard Subdivision on SD, which would have added 5 more lots for a total of 10. These additional lots would come from active farmland and would have directly impacted the view of the Tidal Creek and Peconic Bay. When we decided to move forward with the 80/60 Conservation Subdivision, our initial lot design had the 5 lots along the southern side of South Dyer overlooking the Tidal Creek. See attached layout.This represented the best views for the house lots we could build. In recognition of the impact this would have both for our lots across the street on North Dyer, and for the impact on the local community and visitors,we decided to move the proposed lots to the least noticeable part of the property that still had good views for our family. The proposed 25' private right of way is more in keeping with the rural character of the surrounding areas than a 50' curbed road would be. Planning Board and NY Superintendent of Highways approvals are needed, but we meet the criteria to allow for this approach. 27 r SAM 15 E.PUTNAM AVENUE,A234.GREENWICH,CT 06830 P:860.287.38081 F:631.788.7192{samC,sfapc.ret Visual Impact Study (VIS) — South Dyer Lots — Supplemental Report 16 October 2015 The purpose of this study is to accurately portray the visual impact of the five South Dyer lots along Rt. 25 and Orient Harbor as if the lots were fully developed. To that end, houses were designed for the lots, and photo-realistic images of the houses were made at various points along Rt. 25 and in the harbor. This report describes the steps used in creating the VIS, and provides some analysis of the findings. Zoning The South Dyer property has been divided into five lots, each containing a single family dwelling and accessory structures. The lots are all under one acre in size but follow R-80 bulk regulations for setbacks, coverage and building height. The lots are undersized for R- 80 zoning. Even though the zoning code allows for setbacks to be reduced for undersized lots—meaning that the code in this case would allow for wider houses, closer to the road— the more restrictive R-80 setbacks provide more open space between the houses and help reduce the density of the development. It is the appropriate zoning for these lots. Otherwise, the houses and lots meet the maximum bulk regulations for the zone: 20% lot coverage; 60' front yard setback; 45' total setback for both side yards; 35' building height. These houses represent the maximum development allowed on these lots. We have also included a potential alternative for developing houses on four lots instead of rive. In the four-house option we have essentially kept the five lot-design, but the area to the west of the existing farm road and a portion of the southernmost lot area will remain in agriculture and be added to the preserved acres on South Dyer. For the four-house option we have used R-40 setbacks(instead of R-80), which allow for wider houses. Our intention is to show the maximum appropriate development By reducing the number of houses from five to four and increasing the width of the houses, the overall density of the four-house option is similar to the five-house option and represents the maximum bulk regulations. These lots are roughly 40,000 sq. ft. With 20% coverage, the maximum allowable Building Area would be 8,000 sq. ft. Building Area includes not just the house but also accessory structures, above-grade decks and terraces, swimming pools, tennis courts, etc. It should be noted that there are many properties in Orient that are at least 40,000 sq. ft. and are allowed 20% coverage, so the South Dyer lots are not unique in this respect. Design of the Houses The task was to design five theoretical houses—one per lot—that would do the following: 1. maximize the bulk regulations; 2. be architecturally appropriate and have wide appeal; 3. could be seen as reasonable to build in this location After much discussion with the Tuthills, it was decided not to design five entirely new houses but instead develop designs that draw from houses either currently existing in Orient or that once existed. We are drawing from both the architectural heritage of Orient and from architectural styles and building elements that are very familiar to people in town. We looked around Orient for existing houses that were good examples of traditional vernacular architecture and also were of a similar size and scale as what the South Dyer houses could be. From that group, we selected four that represented an architectural range within the traditional spectrum, and put them on our lots. We had to modify the houses somewhat to fit our setbacks, and we increased the building heights to meet the maximum, but otherwise these are houses that one could see in town. We did this for two reasons: 1) by replicating existing houses, it reinforces the point that these are examples of houses only, and it hopefully redirects people away from wanting to scrutinize the designs and back to the more general issues of size, scale, etc.; 2) there is a comfort in the familiar, and we want to preserve the architectural character of the town, not bring in something new. The fifth house is a replica of the summer house that once stood directly across Rt. 25 on the North Dyer parcel that is included in the proposed project. It was built in the late 1800's and was torn down after being heavily damaged in the hurricane of '38. Its distinctive architecture and prominent location ensured that it remained an icon in town for many years. Methodology–creating the photos Our first step was to make a 3D computer model of the South Dyer lots and surrounding area based on a Sketch Plan prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin III, licensed surveyor. We then made 3D computer models of the five houses and placed them on the site. While this work was being completed, we took photos along Rt. 25 and from Orient Harbor, being careful to mark where each photo was taken using GPS. Back in the office we plotted where these photos were taken on our computer site model and set up camera views in the model that exactly match the camera locations and angles in the field. We then used our rendering software to make photo-realistic renderings of the houses from each of the camera locations, cut out the backgrounds of the renderings and superimposed the houses into our site photos. The result is an accurate impression of what the South Dyer lots would look like if fully developed with houses, accessory structures, driveways, and landscaping. Analysis The proposed houses would not be visible from Rt. 25 at any point to the east of the South:.1 Dyer lots. As you travel west from Rackett's Court, it is only as you pass the proposed right- of-way into the South Dyer development that you would first glimpse the houses. Past this point is the farm field with open site lines of the houses from Rt. 25. From the other direction along Rt. 25, traveling east, the houses first become noticeable as a feature on the landscape about a half mile west of the farm stand. From this point to the proposed right-of-way into the South Dyer development is a stretch of about six-tenths of a mile. Our Visual Impact Study includes eleven photographs along this stretch of Rt. 25. It's evident from photos 1-6 that the visual impact along Rt. 25 to the west of the farm stand is benign. In fact, the houses are not even visible from the crab shack to the'farm stand (photos 3-6). It is only when you round the corner (as you're heading east) and first glimpse the farm stand do you more fully see the houses behind. Photo 8 is the view that is considered the most iconic–the direct view across the farm field to Orient Harbor and Shelter Island beyond. It is the full panorama of the harbor and views to the west that most need protecting. The South Dyer houses have been tucked as far off to the east side as possible so that none of this iconic view is disturbed. From no vantage point do the proposed houses block any existing view of the harbor. Photo 7—taken just east of the farm stand—gives the clearest view of the scale of the houses against the landscape. From this distance the tops of the roofs fall under the tree line, which helps to preserve the natural scale of the landscape. The houses do not seem too tight together given their height, which suggests that the R-80 zoning is appropriate. The overall density and massing looks good to me, especially since this is the maximum development that would be reasonably built on these lots. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources 1.The proposed action may occur wholly/partially within/substantially contiguous to,any buildings, archeological site or district,which is listed on or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for the State or National Register of Historic Places. The proposed action may result in:the destruction or alteration of all or part of the site or property,the alteration of the property's setting or integrity,the introduction of visual elements which are out of character with the site or property,or may alter its setting. Lead Agency Concern Areas- Potential moderate to large adverse impact of South Dyer,which is adjacent to the Orient National Historic District. Magnitude of potential impacts Part of the eastern boundary of the South Dyer parcel is adjacent to the Orient Historic District. The proposed action will involve 5 new single-family residential house lots.They will not destroy or alter any of the Orient Historic District site, property, setting or integrity. Importance of potential impacts The SD property provides an important visual transition between the views coming from East Marion heading into Orient.This starts with the Causeway views of the Long Island Sound, Peconic Bay and Tidal creek with the distant view of the houses along the Orient Harbor.This leads to the beginnings of the Orient residential areas along the,North side of the Main Road and the farmland along the South side.The proposed SD lots will provide a continuation of the houses that line the Orient harbor and will create a backdrop for the end of the SD agricultural area. Based on the Orient Historic District website,the houses in the district cover several different styles. Cape Cod, framed dwellings sheathed with shingles or clapboard having a moderately pitched roof, Federal,Greek Revival, Italianate,Second Empire, rural vernacular frame architecture and the ornate frame structures of the late Victorian era.The website describes Orient as exhibiting a notable congruity in appearance despite the numerous styles represented in its structures.Our intent would be to develop the SD House lots in a way that would harmonize with the range of styles present in the District.We would build all houses in accordance with any standards set by the Zoning or Building Departments in affect at the time of development. Probability of occurrence of potential impacts -Given the wide variety of architectural styles in the Historic District there is very low probability that the houses we would build in the future would be out of character. 2.The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within,or substantially contiguous to,an area designated as sensitive for archeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office archeological site inventory.The proposed action may result in:destruction or alteration of all or part of the site or property, the alteration of the property's setting or integrity,the introduction of visual elements which are out of character with the site or property,or may alter its setting. Lead Agency Concern Areas - Results of the Phase 16 Cultural Assessment Magnitude,importance and probability of occurrence of potential impacts The Archeological IB Survey did Shovel Tests and walkovers covering our 17 proposed lots, roads and some additional areas. No historic artifacts were found. However,there were white quartzite artifact fragments found on the proposed SB lot,which is evidence of a prehistoric site. If we want to proceed with this SB lot location, Phase II intensive testing is recommended. 28 COMtIGHT OC1997-1016 rill In, P 1a; T.,GOMMCHGROUP 'flOME WHAT"S, NEM SITUNDEX SEARCH rient Historic District Lp Architect Nassau Suffolk Local Experienced Architects All phases of Architectural work Q O SEE ALSO J -y The Orient Historic District was listed on the National Register of Historic Places New York f in 1976. [+] Portions of the content on this web page were adapted from a Suffolk County copy of the original nomination document. Adaptation copyright © 2010, The Southold Town Orient Historic District Gombach Group. I Description III a®� I Post Office: Orient I Located at the eastern extremity of Long Island's north fork, the hamlet of {Zip: 11957 Orient is situated on the southwestern side of the fork in a tract extending from Truman's Beach to Orient Point. Orient Historic District encompasses approximately sixty acres which comprise the center of both the historical and present community of Orient. This traditionally agricultural and seafaring district is bounded on its east and west sides by farmlands, on the south by Orient Harbor and Gardiner's Bay, and on the north by New York Route 25, formerly King's Highway, a road established in 1661. Despite the encroachment of suburban development into eastern Suffolk County in recent years, the hamlet of Orient retains the atmosphere of a Long Island community of the nineteenth century. Orient Historic District encompasses over one hundred dwellings and public buildings constructed between the late eighteenth and the late nineteenth centuries, all of which continue to be used and occupied. The most common of early Orient houses is the so-called Cape Cod type, a frame dwelling of one and one-half stories sheathed in shingles or clapboard, having a central chimney and moderately pitched roof. The simple cornices of the earliest houses are nearly level with the tops of the first story windows. Later examples of this style in the Orient Historic District are two full stories in height. During the nineteenth century Orient experienced a succession of building styles, and within the Orient Historic District are to be found adaptations of Greek Revival, Italianate, and Second Empire styles, as well as numerous examples of the rural vernacular frame architecture common throughout much of Long Island from approximately 1800 to the turn of the century. Orient Historic District is particularly rich in examples of these nineteenth century architectural styles. In addition to dwellings, Orient Historic District includes Orient Wharf, the focal point for the community's seafaring activities since it was established at its present site in 1740. The quiet residential streets of Orient are lined with large spreading shade trees, among which is an ancient buttonwood tree at the -= intersection of Route 25 and Young's Road which was already providing shade by the mid-eighteenth century. Throughout its history Orient has resisted the incursions of modern development occurring elsewhere in the area. Though modern dwellings dot the Orient Historic District, the only concentrations of such structures are in areas peripheral to the,district, chiefly along Oysterponds Lane and Navy Street. The community nevertheless retains its rural atmosphere, and active preservation and restoration efforts by local residents perpetuate the architectural integrity of the Orient Historic District. Significance Orient Historic District is a living and largely uncompromised visual reminder of the rural agricultural and seafaring heritage of eastern Long Island from the late eighteenth through the nineteenth century. Because of its location on Gardiner's Bay on the southwest side of Long Island's north fork, Orient traditionally turned to the sea for its livelihood, both for fishing and for transporting its agricultural produce to urban markets. The moderate prosperity and egalitarian spirit which characterized Orient is reflected in the architecture and uniform scale of its homes and public buildings. The Orient Historic District encompasses over one hundred structures built prior to 1900 on the streets near the harbor, buildings which document the evolution of Long Island's rural vernacular architecture over a period of one and one-half centuries. Orient is particularly significant for having retained a sense of timeless architectural harmony throughout its long, active life as a community. Virtually all the homes continue to be occupied by summer or year-round residents. Commercial development has been all but excluded, the sole exceptions being a general store and post office. This hardy coastal community and its rural environment are among the last vestiges of a lifestyle rapidly disappearing from much of eastern Long Island in the face of modern suburban encroachment. The area occupied by the present community of Orient was originally inhabited by the Algonquin Indian tribes of eastern Long Island. The Indian name for the Orient peninsula was Poquatuck. The English who settled South in 1640 knew the area as Oysterponds, and purchased it from the Indians. The year 1661 is generally accepted as the date when Oysterponds was permanently settled by Europeans.[1] Shortly thereafter the road which became known as King's Highway (the present Route 25) was laid through Oysterponds, becoming the boundary for farm plots located on Long Island Sound to the north and Gardiner's Bay to the south. By 1717 there were twenty-four families living at Oysterponds. Many early settlers built and owned commercial vessels which made use of the excellent sheltered harbor of Orient. During the first quarter of the eighteenth century settlers purchased numerous small plots near the harbor for the building of homes and shops. In 1940 Richard Shaw built a —, commercial wharf and warehouse in the harbor. While some local residents worked as tradesmen and fishermen, farming remained the principal occupation on the Orient peninsula.[2] The early eighteenth-century houses built in Oysterponds were the basic types found elsewhere on eastern Long Island: the shingled or clapboarded one-story cottage with central chimney; a somewhat larger version with small windows in the half story, below a simple cornice; and the two-story gable-roofed house with center chimney and entryway. Several of Orient's eighteenth-century houses retain interior trim and doorways attributed to Amon Tabor, a local master house carpenter who worked between 1730 and 1785. The extant eighteenth-century homes within the Orient Historic District reflect the simple tastes and limited means of their builders. The history of the settlement at Oysterponds (known as Orient after 1836) has been shaped by various economic and social factors which similarly affected the life of numerous rural Long Island communities. During the Revolutionary!War the British plundered the farms around Oysterponds, and used the north fork as a staging area for Loyalist raids on Connecticut towns across Long Island Sound. The hamlet of Oysterponds likewise felt the effects of the British blockade of eastern Long Island brought by the War of 1812.[3] During the first half of the nineteenth century, however, the community began to experience a period of economic growth during which agriculture, fishing, and maritime commerce again became profitable ventures. Alongside the simple one-story frame dwellings of the eighteenth-century farmers the masters of sloops which called Orient Harbor their home port began to build their more refined homes in a variety of architectural styles. Within the Orient Historic District are excellent examples of the shingle on frame Cape Cod cottage, adaptations of Federal and Greek Revival domestic architecture, the Italianate and Second Empire homes of the mid-nineteenth century, and the ornate frame structures of the late Victorian era. The community of Orient exhibits a notable congruity in appearance despite the numerous styles represented in its structures. The dwellings are modest in proportion and unpretentious in their location. The extant houses of the Orient Historic District reflect little disparity between the well-to-do and those builders of more modest means, between employers and artisans. While some buildings have been subjected to the inevitable structural alterations of long active use, a number of exteriors have been preserved or carefully restored. The one hundred extant historic structures of Orient are an excellent representation of Long Island's rural vernacular architecture as it evolved from the simple cottages of the mid-eighteenth century through the more ornate structures of the late nineteenth century. Picket fences and large shade trees preserve the ordered rural atmosphere of the historic district and give the hamlet a sense of overall visual integrity. Orient has retained its setting and its sense of community into the twentieth century. With the coming of rail and motor transportation to eastern Long Island, the importance of shipping from Orient Harbor declined, and with it the associated supportive industries which once lined the wharfs and waterfront streets of the community. Commercial duck hunting, shell fishing, and commercial and sport fishing as well as truck farming nevertheless remained important local industries into the twentieth century. Despite the change and commercial development occurring in nearby areas of Suffolk County, the residents of Orient have resisted this encroachment and preserved the rural atmosphere of the historic district. Faced with growing pressures on the land, the community remains hopeful that through controlled development, those who would bring change will do so with respect for Orient's past. Endnotes 1. Richard Keogh, "History of Orient" (unpublished typescript on deposit, N.Y. State Division for Historic Preservation, Albany, N.Y., 1974), 1. 2. Ibid. 3. Journal of Augustus Griffin, 1767-1866, Oysterponds Historical Society, Orient, N.Y. References Keogh, Richard. History of Orient." Typescript on deposit N>Y> State Division for Historic Preservation, Albany, N.Y. Manley, Seon. Long Island Discovery. Garden City, 1966. Oysterponds Historical Society, Orient, N.Y. Journal of Augustus Griffin, 1767- 1866. [t] Raymond W. Smith, New York State Office of Parks and Recreation, Division for Historic Preservation, Miller Place Historic District, nomination document, 1976, National Park Service, National Register of Historic Places, Washington, D.C. Orient Historic Diistruct Maps Street Names Bay Avenue West • Fletcher Street o Harbor River Road a Main Road Navy Street ® Old Farm Road G Orchard Street e Oyster Ponds Lane e Racketts Court • Route 25 • Skippers Lane a Tabor Road a Village Lane x K- IZ JL PW .t +w( i �"1'•-.�H•- KTP• a ^- r 4 Aw- ' AL— w t a ^mac j - • 1 • 1 / �• :eta ,�•�.� T�"•-+!- fid.. � 4�_ �,. r kA - I ,y. m x_ 1 1 1 '� '� e '�� �. '�`��'+:��'' � �`•fir' '�. � 'iY ».- r• it •'4.J �t � - - - ,; ���• rah• •.�h.- �: _4 ',+ _ - i i�Z h � � +.e •Tv ..r :�„wi•. �•p.0.\ 'a�\�, - �.� .may` 4 + ._ Y � i� �, ,+. �J T.�•, /,.r_ ,.+r It Lag All I i tl1 L. a Phase 15 Archaeological Survey for the Proposed Tuthill subdivision Orient,Town of 5outhold,Sugolk County, New York December 2015 Prepared for: Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company, Orient, New York Alfred G. Cammisa, RPA with Alexander Padilla (CAD) 851 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY PR#: none known Involved agencies:. Town of Southold& NYDEC Phase: Phase IB Location: Orient,Town of Southold, Suffolk County Survey Area: -North Dyer: Length:about 1275 feet(389 meters) north-south Width:averaging about 300 feet(91 m)east-west -South Dyer: Length:about 825 feet(252 meters) north-south Width:up to about 300 feet(91 m)east-west -North Brown: Length:about 600 feet(183 meters)north-south Width:about 400 feet(122 m) east-west -South Brown: Length:about 250 feet(76 meters) north-south Width:about 627 feet(206 m)east-west Acres Tested:approximately 30.5 acres worth (12 hectares)total USGS: Orient, NY Survey overview: ST no. &interval:495 at 50-25 ft. (15-7.5m) intervals Size of freshly plowed area:So. Dyer&So. Brown Surface survey transect interval:5 to 3 meters Results: A Prehistoric site limited to the south lot on South Brown (from a walkover) No historic archaeological remains Results of Architectural Survey: No.Of buildings/structures/cemeteries in project area:single course surface stones/foundation base& nearby rubble of destroyed 1920's house on North Dyer No.Of buildings/structures/cemeteries adjacent to project area on property: No. Dyer:bam&carriage house;So. Dyer:2 houses with garages;sculptures on No. Brown beach No.Of previously determined NR listed or eligible buildings/structures/cemeteries/districts: 1 district adjacent to So. Dyer parcel No. Of identified eligible buildings/structures/cemeteries/districts:none Authors: Alfred G. Cammisa, M.A./RPA,with Alexander Padilla, B.A. (CAD) Date of Report: Report completed December, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................................................1 FieldMethods............................................................................................................................................1 FieldResults..............................................................................................................................................1-3 Conclusions and Recommendations.........................................................................................................3 Bibliography 3 Appendix 1: Figures and Photos Appendix 2: Shovel Tests LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Portion of the Orient, New York USGS Figure 2(a-d) Location of the shovel tests on the project area LIST OF PHOTOS Photo 1 Looking north from ST 9, North Dyer Photo 2 Looking SW from ST 18, North Dyer Photo 3 Looking west from ST 109, North Dyer Photo 4 Looking south from ST 1,South Dyer Photo 5 Looking east from ST 16,South Dyer Photo 6 Looking south from North Brown beach at 1 of many stone sculptures Photo 7 Looking east from near ST 71, North Brown Photo 8 Looking SE from near ST 1,South Brown Photo 9 Looking SE from near ST 14, South Brown INTRODUCTION Between June 6 to September 6, 2015, TRACKER Archaeology, Inc. conducted a Phase IB archaeological survey for the proposed Tuthill subdivision, in Orient, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The purpose of the surrey was to provide physical evidence for the presence or absence of archaeological sites on the project area.The current Phase IB field investigations were recommended by a previous Phase IA documentary study conducted on the property(Cammisa 2011). The project area is about 30.5 acres proposed to be subdivided from an approximate 100 acre property. The property and the project areas are divided into 4 separate properties. North and South Dyer are adjacent but divided by Main Road and located in western Orient. North Dyer is bordered to the north by Long Island Sound and South Dyer is bordered to the south by Orient Bay. North and South Brown are adjacent but divided by Main Road and located about 3600 feet or more east of North and South Dyer. North Brown is bordered to the north by the Long Island Sound and South Brown is bordered to the south by Narrow River. The work was performed by TRACKER Archaeology, Inc. of Monroe, New York. Field work was conducted by PI,Alfred G. Cammisa,field director,Alexander Padilla, B.A. and field technicians,Alfred T. Cammisa, Conner Winters, B.A., Edward Tassinari, Hakeem Poe, William Rodrigues, and Elijah Padilla. Report preparation by Principal Investigator,Alfred Cammisa with Alexander Padilla(CAD). The work was performed for Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company, Orient, New York. FIELD METHODS Walkover i Any exposed ground surfaces were walked over at about 3 to 5 meter intervals to observe for artifacts. Covered ground terrain was reconnoitered at approximately 15 meter intervals to observe for any above ground features,such as berms,depressions,or rock configurations which might be evidence for historic or prehistoric features. Photographs were taken of the property. Shovel Testino Shovel tests(ST's)were excavated at 15 to 7.5 meter intervals across the project area.The closer intervals were used along the North Brown bluff where a close by prehistoric site was recorded. Each ST measured about 30 to 40 cm. in diameter and was dug into the underlying subsoil (B horizon) 10 to 20 cm.when possible.All soils were screened through 1/4 inch wire mesh and observed for artifacts. Shovel tests were flagged in the field. Soil stratigraphy was recorded according to texture and color. Soil color was matched against the Munsell color chart for soils. Notes were transcribed in a notebook. FIELD RESULTS Field testing of the project area included the excavation of 495 ST's at 15 to 7.5 meter intervals: 152 ST's at North Dyer,94 ST's at South Dyer, 201 ST's at North Brown, and 48 ST's at South Brown. In addition, South Dyer and South Brown were plowed agricultural fields and were also subjected to a surface reconnaissance/walkover. Prehistoric remains were encountered on the proposed south lot at South Brown. No historic artifacts were recovered.One, likely early twentieth century stone foundation was encountered and a likely associated house rubble nearby. No historic(standing)buildings were on the project areas but there some adjacent to some of the project areas(see Cammisa 2011). 1 A neighbor who came to talk to the archaeologists in the field commented that he had pot-hunted the South Brown farm field and the other plowed properties all his life as did a close family member,the famous Roy Latham.The area he pointed out was the southern portion of South Brown. Stratigraphy Stratigraphy across the project area consisted of the following: A/O horizon-0 to 9 cm.thick of root mat, leaf litter and humus.This layer was largely absent on plowed fields (South Brown &South Dyer). A or Ap horizon- 14 to 51 cm.thick of 10YR4/3 brown loamy sand. B horizon- 10 to 20 cm. dug into of 10YR5/6 yellow brown loamy sand. North Dyer: North Dyer vegetation consisted of overgrown pastures(once used to raise trotter horses) and wooded areas with manicured lawns with some over grown areas in the southern portion.The remains of an early twentieth century building (brick and lumber), about 20 feet by 35 feet, destroyed by a hurricane of 1938 was also encountered, mostly buried.According to the property owner,this was the remains of the"House of 7 Gables",from Orient.A single course stone foundation base was found in the vicinity of the house rubble.According to the property owner,this may have been a foundation for either 1 of the outbuildings of the House of 7 Gables or the old school house. South Dyer:consisted of recently plowed field North Brown:consisted of mostly a thickly overgrown wooded area so dense that field work was postponed until the end of the summer and was partially cleared mechanically beforehand.Along the I. beach,stone relief sculptures of Indians were encountered.They was carved by Elliot Brooks (see Oysterponds Historical Society&East End Beacon). South Brown:consisted of a cultivated farm field. No artifacts were recovered on the proposed lots along the road. However, artifacts were recovered all through the south proposed lot here from a walkover although the ground probably had about 50 percent visibility. Eight ST's by comparison were excavated here with only 1 positive ST, illustrating both the artifact density and most appropriate field technique to use henceforth.This site continues south off the project area toward the water and the recorded Hallock Site (flaking station,see Cammisa 2011). Artifact Inventory from South Brown (south proposed lot)walkover: all were white quartzite A i act Count We`g gra s primary decort.flakes 9 180.5 secondary decort.flakes 12 41.6 tertiary flakes 19 33.1 Bifaces 6 46.6 Scraper 1 13.8 Core with cortex 1 38.8 2 0 Projectile Points 2 5.1 In addition, 1 quartzite tertiary flake was recovered from ST 6(.7 grams)in the same lot as the walkover. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS During the course of the Phase IB survey,495 ST's were excavated.A prehistoric site was encountered on the southerly proposed lot at the South Brown property. No historic artifacts were recovered.A single course surface stone foundation, likely associated with the House of 7 Gables outbuildings or the school house was encountered. -We recommend Phase II intensive testing on the south proposed lot of the South Brown property of the project area,about 1.5 acres in size, prior to any development related ground breaking or construction which threatens site information (see Figure 2D Addendum). The purpose of the Phase 1 archaeological survey is to establish the presence or absence of archaeological sites. If the site is to be impacted by proposed construction or other activities, Phase 11 intensive testing of any archaeological site is them specified by the regulations of the New York State Historic Preservation Office and the National Advisory,Council on Historic preservation. Phase II investigation methods should interpret the archaeological sites and determine if it is eligible for the nomination to State or National Registers of Historic Places. Phase II investigations would supply information needed to make this determination and would include: 1) Site integrity, including the depth and extent of undisturbed soil horizons and the presence or absence of cultural features, and the degree of natural and/or human disturbances to those features. 2) Cultural components/affiliations and time range present. 3)Vertical and horizontal distribution of archaeological remains(spatial boundaries and stratigraphic levels). 4) Site interpretation, including any uniqueness/significance, in a local or regional context, must be demonstrated. No further work is recommended for the remainder of the project areas. BIBLIOGRAPHY Cammisa,Alfred G.with Alexander Padilla(CAD) 2011 Phase IA Archaeological Documentary Study for the proposed Tuthill subdivision Orient, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York.TRACKER Archaeology, Inc#709. East End Beacon web site. Oysterponds Historical Society web site. United States Geologic Survey 1957 Orient, New York quadrangles,7.5 minute series. 3 Impact on Critical Environmental Areas EAF Part 2 Potential Moderate to Large Impact The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or characteristic,which was the basis for designation of the CEA Lead Agency Concern Areas Impacts of South Dyer to the NYSDEC Critical Environmental Area of Peconic Bays and Environ—The Peconic Bays and Environ was designated effective 11/13/1988 as a Critical Environmental Area based on a benefit to human health and protecting drinking water. Magnitude/importance -The magnitude of the potential SD impact has already been mitigated by the proposed Conservation Subdivision, which would preserve 74%of the buildable land and reduce density by 50%. The potential new impact on the Peconic Bays and Environ would come from development of 5 new house lots with conventional septic systems in an area currently devoted to agriculture. The SCDHS Reclaim Our Water Septic Improvement Program cites nitrogen pollution from cesspools and septic systems as the single largest cause of degraded water quality.They calculate the average residential septic system discharges—40 pounds of nitrogen per year. The Suffolk County Sanitary Code (Article 6, Chapter 760-608 B. 1 a-d) approves individual sewerage systems for projects outside of Groundwater Management Zones III,V and VI; all 4 of our parcels are in Zone IV. We meet additional requirements of minimum 20,000 s.f. lot size, and not being within an existing sewer district, and we will comply with all other County and State requirements. In Robert L. Uebler, Ph.D Soil Scientist's report on 'How a Conventional Ground Absorption Septic Tank System Treats Household Wastewater(attached), it explains Nitrogen is present at 70mg/L in wastewater entering the septic system. When it leaves and enters the soil, Nitrogen is present at 40 mg/I. The soil treats the suspended solids through filtration and digestion by aerobic organisms. Most nitrogen is converted to positively charged ammonia in the septic tank, which is attracted to negatively charged soil. The soil treatment impact dilutes nitrogen to<10 mg/I,which is considered safe for reuse.This is the level of nitrogen that could ultimately reach surface water.The SCDHS establishes standards to ensure septic systems perform in this safe manner. Probability of occurrence of potential impacts The probability of significant impacts is low since the Suffolk County Department of Health Service has approved SD Test Well water analysis and Test Hole Soil analysis. This confirms that we have adequate potable water,that there is no evidence of salt water incursion and that the soil conditions are acceptable for conventional septic systems. 29 The SCDHS has established a Design Flow of 300 gpd water usage and wastewater discharge for Zone IV(SD). Density for this Zone has been defined based on 40,000 s.f. lots.The SCDHS has determined the impact on water supply demand, sustainability of the aquifer, and wastewater discharge is acceptable at this level. The proposed South Dyer design is based on density of 80,000 s.f. lots and then reducing the#of lots by 50%,which would significantly lower Ground and Surface water impacts versus the Suffolk County Health Department Design Flow Standards. Specifically, SD's impact would be only 28%of the SCDHS Yield level and half the Zoning Yield --a sizeable reduction in impact. South Dyer Design Flow Comparison -Rots(gpd water usage and wastewater discharge) Parcel(Zoning District), SCDHS Yield* Zoning Yield Prop.Cons. Sub.Yield South Dyer(R-80) 18 (5400) 10(3000) 5 (1500) * Based on 20,000 s.f.lots The Suffolk County Reclaim Our Waters program has 4 Surface Waters Contributing Area classifications regarding need for advanced wastewater treatment (see attached maps): • Priority#1 • Priority#2 • < 2 years Baseflow Contributing Areas to Surface Waters • 2-25 year Baseflow Contributing Areas to Surface Waters South Dyer is in the< 2 year, lower priority classification area. Mitigation Already Taken- Density reduction of 50%cuts potential impact in half. Our Oysterponds Shellfish Aquaculture operation on SD is improving the quality of the Peconic Bays by removing Nitrogen from the water. The East Coast Shellfish Growers Association in "Shellfish Culture is Good For the Environment" cites that since oysters are 1.4 percent nitrogen by weight,for every 10,000 oysters shipped, 23 pounds of nitrogen are removed from the water. In 2017 we shipped over 700,000 oysters, which represents elimination of 1,610 pounds of Nitrogen from the Peconic Bay areas.This is 8 times the estimated maximum annual nitrogen discharge for our SD proposal. Since the business started in 2003, we have shipped about 2,000,000 oysters, which eliminated 4,600 pounds of nitrogen—23 times the estimated SD maximum annual discharge. 30 Consistency With Community Character 1.The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services(e.g. schools, police and fire) Lead Agency Concern Areas - Expected to create a demand for police and fire services Intent of Proposed Action The intent of the proposed action is to keep the land/lots in the family over many generations. No immediate development is planned. Magnitude/importance of potential impacts-Source Information:Town of Southold Full Demographic Inventory for the Comprehensive Plan (population history and projections); US Census If all 17 lots were developed as year round occupancy,the total increase in population would likely be about 37-41 people, based on the average household size of Orient and Southold Town, respectively. This represents a 5-6% increase versus the 709 people living in Orient in 2000, but would be 8% below the 817 people in 1990. For the Town of Southold the increase would be 0.2%versus the 2000 census. ; These increases are relatively small compared to the significant population increase in the summer: 'Town of Southold nearly doubles during July/August and Wikipedia estimates Orient residents go up 25% in the summer.Town of Southold estimates one-third of residences in the Town are attributed to seasonal residency by second homeowners and about 50% in Orient. This indicates our potential population increase would not represent an important change to the current police and fire services, which are set up to handle far larger increases in the population. Probability of occurrence of potential impacts There is a high probability that it will be many years before all 17 lots are developed and most will be summer/vacation homes. Family members will have the right to purchase any lot that could be sold in the future. This is further insurance that the lots will stay in the family. Even if all 17 lots were developed immediately,there would be little to no impact on police and fire services. 2.The proposed action is inconsistent with predominant architectural scale/character. Lead Agency Concern Areas • South Dyer siting and scale of homes • North Dyer and North Brown impacts to State Route 25 a.SD Siting Magnitude/importance-The proposed action consists of 5 single-family residences located in the least-visible, east side of SD, 4 of which are recessed in a niche that borders lots on Oysterponds Lane. 31 Probability of occurrence of potential impacts -The houses would not obstruct, eliminate or significantly screen the view from NYS Route 25/Orient Harbor. At most they would be in the distant background or on the margin of photos and paintings made of the view from our property. This should provide a pleasing transition between the farmland and residential area of the community. , < SD Siting-Mitigation already taken. Originally we were planning to do a Standard Subdivision on SD, which would have added 5 more lots for a total of 10.These additional lots would come from active farmland and would have directly impacted the view of the Tidal Creek and Peconic Bay. Our initial Conservation Subdivision lot design had the 5 lots along the southern side of South Dyer overlooking the Tidal Creek. (See attached.)This represented the best views for the house lots we could build. We decided to move the proposed lots to the least noticeable part of the property in recognition of the impact this would have, both for our lots across the street on North Dyer and for the impact on the local community and visitors. b.SD Scale of homes Magnitude/importance/Probability of occurrence Since we are not planning any development in the foreseeable future,the size/design of future houses ,is very, peculative. -All future houses would meet Zoning and Building code regulations and any other established standards associated with house design, so they will be in keeping with the permitted scale. We intend the houses to represent the character of the waterfront homes in Orient,to provide a good transition to the Historic District and be attractive to local residents and visitors to the area. SD Scale of homes-Mitigation already taken The Conservation Subdivision reduces the scale of the houses by limiting lot sizes. The proposed average SD lot is 39,600 s.f.versus the R-80 required 80,000 s.f, which further limits the scale of the houses. c. ND Impacts to State Route 25 Magnitude/importance/probability of occurrence �• °Only-two_of_the-six_house_lots_are.visible-from_State_Route 25. The houses would sit back at least 300' from the road, minimizing their impacts.There is already one existing house, barn and auxiliary building on this parcel that were originally outbuildings for the "House of Seven Gables" located on SD, which was destroyed in the 1938 hurricane.There are no current plans to develop a second lot on State Route 25, but any future house would abide by the Zoning and Building Code regulations and any other established house design standards established at that time. d. NB Impacts to State Route 25 Magnitude/importance/probability of occurrence -No=lots=ar-e-visible-from.State--Route_25-so_there=would be=fid-impact_on-State-Route=25. There are no current plans to develop the NB lots, but any future house would abide by the Zoning and Building Code regulations and any other established house design standards established at that time. 32 Alternatives 1. Move one lot from South Dyer to North Dyer or North Brown in area that is not currently farmed- We would adjust the remaining 4 SD lots so boundaries would be to the east of the existing farm road. See attached SD 4-lot alternate layout. Mitigation on Environmental Impact - Fewer houses in the far eastern border of South Dyer, which is contiguous with the Orient Historic District, would lessen the potential impact on: • The view from the Route 25 Scenic By-Way (Aesthetic Resources, Historic Resources, and Consistency with Community Character) • Agricultural land and Prime Soils irreversibly converted to residential use - an additional 1.7 acres of actively farmed, Soil Group 1 land would remain in agriculture. • The Peconic Bay and Orient Tidal Creek (Critical Environmental Areas) - Surface Water, Ground Water and Flooding Impact would be reduced by 20% (4 lot impact versus 5 lots) 2. No Action Likely Circumstances At The Project Site If The Project Does Not Proceed - If the proposed project does not proceed, one house could be built on each of the 3 parcels that currently have no houses (South Dyer, North Brown, and South Brown). This would not preclude applying for Subdivisions at a future date. The 3 potential new houses would be built in line with all building, zoning and Health Department codes and regulations, but would not be governed by further Subdivision standards and requirements. 3. Likely Future Conditions If Developed To Maximum Allowed Under Existing Zoning Standard Subdivisions represent the maximum development allowed under existing zoning. The Standard Subdivision Yield calculations would total 42 houses, versus 17 proposed; 52.7 Buildable acres would be kept as Open Space (60%) versus 70.9 acres (80%) proposed. Standard Versus Proposed Conservation Subdivision Implications R-80 Zone R-200 Zone Total ND SD NB SB SB Buildable Acres 15.38 19.43 26.68 15.57 10.72 87.8 Yield -# Lots Std. Sub. 8 10 14 8 2 42 Yield - # Lots Prop. Cons. 6 5 5 1 0 17 Yield Std. Vs Prop. Cons. +2 +5 +9 +7 +2 +25 Preserved Ac. -Std. Sub. 9.2 11.7 16.0 9.3 6.4 52.7 Preserved Ac.- Prop. Cons. 9.9 14.4 21.6 14.3 10.7 70.9 Prsvd. Std. Vs Prop. Cons. -0.7 -2.7 -5.6 -5.0 -4.3 -18.2 Environmental Impact of Standard Subdivisions Versus the Proposed Project - Standard Subdivisions would create a sizeable increase in the impact on all environmental areas versus our Conservation Subdivision proposal, due mainly to 25 additional houses and 18 fewer preserved Buildable acres. Depending on placement of the house lots, total active agriculture would be reduced between 6 to 23 acres, a 12%to 44% loss, compared to a 6 acre (10%) loss of agricultural land proposed. See attached farm impact details. Also, it is highly likely more houses would be visible from NYS Route 25. 33 4. Alternative Wastewater Management Systems Suffolk County Initiated an innovative and alternative onsite wastewater treatment system (I/A OWTS) Demonstration Project in 2014. The purpose of the program is to assess the design, operation, maintenance, installation, and overall ability of I/A OWTS technology to meet nitrogen reduction objectives. Demonstration systems were installed in 19 year round residences between June 24, 2015 and February 29, 2016. Technologies that maintained an average of 19 mg/1 Total Nitrogen (TN) or better for 75% of all systems tested for a minimum of 6 months were granted provisional approval. 2016 I/A OTWS Demo Performance in Suffolk County Technology Average mg/I TN Provisional Use Approval Hydro-Action AN Series 11.6 Approved September 2016 Norweco Singulair TNT 18.3 Approved October 2016 Orenco AX-RT Series 18.5 Approved March 2017 Norweco Hydro-Kinetic 17.5 Approved April 2017 Orenco AX Series 21.6 Cannot Project Approval Busse MMF 72.3 Cannot Project Approval One additional system was approved for Provisional use in January 2018: Fuji Clean CEN. There is no cap on the amount of Provisional systems that may be installed in year-round residences. There are no systems approved for General use at this time and no testing has been done on Seasonal Residences. For reference, Robert Uebler, PhD Soil Scientist states conventional septic systems discharge 40 mg/I nitrate to soil. This is about double the levels for the I/A systems approved for Provisional use. The conventional system's nitrate discharge is positively charged and attracted to negatively charged soil where it is affected by aerobic nitrifying bacteria and dilutes to < 10 mg/I which is safe for re-use. I/A OTWS technology is a promising way to reduce nitrogen discharge entering the soil, but it's not clear how much better it is versus a conventional septic system's impact after soil treatment. The cost of I/A OTWS technology is 2-4 times that for a conventional septic system. Maintenance and servicing are also more expensive. Most I/A systems discharge Nitrogen to the air, which can also cause environmental contamination. The system start-up involves adding Nitrogen to activate the bacteria that processes the nitrogen and this can take 3 months before the system can be used. There is limited data available on using these systems in seasonal residences, but the owners' manuals indicate special maintenance is required and potentially a new start-up procedure. This could be very inconvenient if a seasonal resident needs to re-set the system 3 months in advance of using it each year, in addition to the extra cost for servicing the system. When a conventional septic system is not in use, no nitrogen is being added to the environment, but I/A OWTS technology seems to need constant Nitrogen to work. The SCDHS has a system for classifying areas in the county that need advanced wastewater treatment. Our parcels are in the lower priority areas (#3 and #4). 1. Priority 1 —Unsewered Residential 2. Priority 2 —Unsewered Residential 3. 0-2 year Baseflow Contributing Areas to Surface Water 4. 2-25 year Baseflow Contributing Areas to Surface Water 34 } SKETCH PLAN SOUTH DYER LOTS __ - SITUATE ORIENT _ !°�•� r TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ++ot SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK "'-`'-- -- ---) - °r iao-,�\ S.C. TAX No. 1000-17-04-14.2 _ SCALE 1"=100' APRIL 1,2011 N ---• a `, �•—�"" '1 P a uavanors us ffrOm¢to m°ar.e.ifaf arvy • AIZEM DMIN ncnmia ux fxoam nwf— ' • .,' t j % ` L adnxf u�fUR DIfIfWTi q ff[fnM°Mtli--------y------_- q 1 D.°[ilA1O 4Q1"W,ifl K n. p r, • \ e ffal;. a-- i oo i e • / � I ,� ham. �''d Q y 4 r All • , • I tt _ ' 'Rif O T �• j �o r 9 A R s 0 wvnr° maf ` 9 serer e t Gr4y 0•C pp°rs L 3' Nathan Taft Corwin a Land Surveyor i \� t URarn=6K73DsgR b Ap / / a FARM-STAND (2) GRANDPAS. SET ASSIDE S (2) a / WETLANDS (�) f•t � e< South Dyer 5 Lot Plan - Optimizing Water Views for Lots I �r `: - �heitFish-: .t`r�, 4r A �=Ni,, Representing the Needs of Aquaculture and Me Ehvironment -` Go' zrrtail Siaru�^ i Join LFStsery °1 'i loin E,_.SCA ji Recipes Issues ; Shellfish Culture is Good for the Environment Sustainability j _ _ _ { Resources ( ; For those of us who grow shellfish,this statement has been a no-brainer for years,but proving it has { Regulations been another matter.Finally we are starting to get -z, some scientific proof to back up our claims.Oysters Research clean the water, remove nitrogen,accelerate ( Marketing _ _ denitrification,enhance water clarity, promote ( Events r ; ;, eelgrass survival,and provide excellent habitat for ' == --_ - ' myriad juvenile fish and crustaceans.All this and Nevis j they taste great and are good for you too! Employment 1 Watch a great:�;4 on the Environmental Benefits of Shellfish Aquaculture. About Us - - f �t Home Download our;;:,: ::} ^: i_�<< �_,:.>__'__ in pdf format. ----' `F- View a series of :._--_ __. ' i$;'_from the 2008 National Symposium on Shellfish and the Environment held In Warwick,Rhode Island on June 9-10,2008. There is an increasingly large body of science to support the assertion that shellfish aquaculture is good for the environment.Brett Dumbauld came out with a nice r=__=--in 2009,entitled'The ecological role of bivalve shellfish aquaculture In the estuarine environment:A review with application to oyster and clam culture in West Coast(USA)estuaries." In 2004 University of Rhode Island graduate student Brian Kilpatrick compared the abundance and diversity of organisms congregating around eelgrass with those on the oyster cages at the Moonstone Oysters Narragansett growing site In Point Judith Pond.His thesis research showed that the abundance of small fish, crustaceans,and invertebrates in the oyster cages was about ten times that in the eelgrass beds,and that the diversity indices at the two sites were about the same. He counted thousands of fish,crabs, and lobsters in the oyster cages, including hundreds of juvenile tautog, black seabass,and other commercially important species.Kilpatrick's paper appeared in::•i__ =of the Journal of Shellfish Research. Subsequently,in 2007 Jessica Tallman showed that oyster cages were similar to artificial reefs and natural cobble reefs in terms of habitat quality for scup and tuatog in an:r _published in the Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. View an •--_ _-:<:__;___^r:; of articles pertaining to shellfish aquaculture assembled by Bob Rheault_If iYs missing any good references please let us know! Denitrification In 2002, Roger Newell and colleagues at the University of Maryland suggested that bacteria in the sediment around oyster bars remove at least 20 percent of the nitrogen in oyster wastes through denitrification,the same process used In modem wastewater treatment plants. "It's mind-boggling what the potential would be if we had a large oyster population In the(Chesapeake)Bay,"Newell said. Oysters are seen as one of the most important species in the Chesapeake.Their filtering clears the water,letting more light penetrate to eel grass beds,while their reefs provide important marine habitat,Earlier work by Neweli showed that historical oyster populations filtered the entire Chesapeake Bay in three to six days. Newell acknowledges that most of the nutrients filtered from the water by oysters are recycled back into the water column,but the flux of undigested plant matter to the sediments stimulates bacterial processes known as nitrification and denitrification.the processes of turning the fertilizer ammonia into nitrate and then into harmless nitrogen gas,which escapes into the atmosphere instead of stimulating phytoplankton blooms. These findings suggest that if a large oyster population could be restored, it could play an important role in helping to achieve the nitrogen reductions needed to help dean up the Chesapeake.Newell said,"You need to do everything you can do to control nutrients on the land, but then,once the nutrients get into the water column,what do you do to get them out?One way may be managing your oyster resource_.." For more information on this topic,see"Influence of simulated bivalve biodeposition and microphytobenthos on sedimentary nitrogen dynamics: a laboratory study,"from the �_•c =_.:r _s_.. of Limnology and Oceanography. Nutrient removal at harvest Since oysters are 1.4 percent nitrogen by weight,when a grower harvests 10,000 oysters for weekly deliveries to customers he is removing about 23 pounds of nitrogen and 2.3 pounds of phosphate and shipping it out.This is equivalent to the annual nitrogen output of a single waterfront homeowner! Odd Lindahl presented an of a mussel farm in Sweden that removed 39 Tons of nitrogen from a fjord annually at a substantial savings compared with a proposed land-based sewer treatment upgrade. The ECSGA supports the development of a system for trading nitrogen credits for shellfish farmers. Old news but good mews... Good news from the courts!In 2002 the Ninth Circuit Court in the state of Washington decided a,_< in favor of a mussel farm.The farm was being sued by a group of waterfront homeowners who claimed that raft-grown mussels were polluting the water with feces and shell.The court found that"...feces and chemicals exuded from live mussels have not been shown in the record significantly to alter the character of Puget Sound waters,and the record suggests instead that the mussel-harvesting operations generally purify the waters." In 2004 the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)issued ^ t___for Aquatic Animal Production Facilities,concluding that shellfish aquaculture does not need new effluent limitations guidelines or regulations,since shellfish"...remove nutrients(in the form of algae)from ambient waters by filtration." Special thanks to Mike Rice,John Kraeuter,Bill Dewey,and others who contributed countless hours on the]SA EPA Aquaculture Effluent Task Force Molluscan Shellfish Technical Subgroup. 4:: -- A Shellfish shellfish Clean the Violater by ellfish Aquaculture Filter Feeding � = Item®ve Stimulates • A single oyster can clear over � Nitrogen Diversity 95 gallons a day, retaining a Recent studies reveal that particles as small as 2 microns. Shellfish remove microscopic shellfish aquaculture can © A small oyster farm in plants as they feed. =species abundance Narragansett, Rl clears 30 to rsity. 100 million gallons each day. m Nitrogen contained in shellfish tissues is removed when o Shells andaquaculture V Reduces turbidity animals are harvested. structures provide habitat V Improves light penetration • Shellfish feedingstimulates of juvenile fish, crabs and s�Improves water quality other organisms. denitrification. Cultured shellfish have gotten a thumbs V Reduces anoxia(low oxygen) up from environmental groups such as Improved light penetration and Environmental Defense, the Chef's reduced nitrogen help eelgrass z CoRaborative's Seafood Solutions, recover. u and others. These groups work to steer consumers towards sustainably harvested seafoods. Oysters are a keystone species, meaning they control the environment in s,o,�,:�' • ', :' , $ "�- -' :; '?'-�- .st'5 i f.tz i r a'' f./'�,: which they live by cleaning the water,while the spaces between <�.r {,` r - •� - = ��",� �=� " -.�� p�° M their shells provide habitat for juvenile fish, crabs, and the organisms on which they feed. Photo courtesy ofierry Prezioso Shellfish improve water quality as they feedby filteringmicroscopicparticles from As both water clarity and light improved, the water.This removes problematic sedi- Penetration are P roved,the — ments and phytoplankton and their associ- eelgrass is able to recover,in r •h " ;` X waters that have not supported y " ° - ` ated nutrients. Some of the nitrogen is 4'` "t" `= "' d the rest is seagrasses for decades. Clearly 4 +,s incorporated into protein an deposited on the bottom where it can be shellfish aquaculture should be P an element of any eelgrass consumedby worms and other organisms. restoration project. Kik Yom' - V 'ed shellfish Farming is Sustainable El�t, Shellfish 0. irk o Shefifish filter S Aquacu tu microscopic plant cells from % the water column Is GOOD ��'j for the 0 Shellfish feed 7, low on the food 7- N ]Environment chain. V 0 No fertilizers, 1623 Whiteside Rd. Toms River,New Jersey 08755 feeds, herbicides, drugs, chemicals, or antibiotics arer. For more information please visit our website: used. www.ECSGA.org t"aq4 Shellfish aquaculture has proven to *0 A -:,�4 be sustainable because it does not damage the environment or ' `"-1-op -T ardize fature productivity. Annual harvests are made possible by r-�' replanting hatchery reared seed. 1 '4 P, F An oyster farmer p, tends his crop Y at low tide. AM= a Filter-feeding'shelffish 46 c :, -A. 11 improve water quality. Shellfish farming provides habitat for fish and improves This pamphlet was financed by the Rhode Island species diversity. Aquaculture1nitiative and Rhode Island Sea Grant o Shellfish aquaculture is sustainable and good eor the environment. .F A Guide to Reducing / 1 Pollution Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Nitrogen.It comprises FERTILIZERS blue-grass and fine fescue, and lawn fertilizers.It gives 80 percent of the air we Complete fertilizers can actually harm lawns by an immediate green-up in breathe.Without it,plants contain nitrogen,phosphorus Promoting more leaf growth both tomatoes and turf.But could not grow.It's an and potassium,represented than root growth; watch out if your soils are element so common to living by the three digit code on 2)tnessy spreading:carelessly sandy and likely to drain the things that it is hard to call every fertilizer bag,such as applying fertilizer near streets nitrate nitrogen into under- this simple element danger- 10-10-10 or 16-4-8. All or other paved surfaces, ground water supplies. ous. fertilizers vary in their allowing rain to wash the But nitrogen in our nutrient analysis,availability nutrients into storm sewers, water—in the form of nitrate Y ty which eventually empty into SEWAGE TREATMENT nitrogen—can be lethal to the soil 'and reactions with a nearby stream and river; Most rural and some life in our waterways.Un- suburban homeowners use naturally high doses of their septic systems ltreat t nitrogen in our streams,lakes / their human waste(black and bays can trigger an Atmospheric Nitrogen water)and waste water from imbalance in the ecosystem household fixtures such as • baths,sinks,and washing with drastic consequences (see page 2) /��` 1 machines(grey water).These Most of the nitrogen /' wlet�eson 1 waste waters are piped to an overloads come from big-time ` -J Biological FlxNlon underground tank which sources,namely agriculture, ~` +� traps the solids and disperses sewage treatment plants,and = - the liquids throughout an electric power plants.But it — absorption field.Here,the also comes from the average F.rolt:K soil neutralizes the waste. home,from inside yourl Once in the soil, bathroom to the cars parked amNH,la - — N nitrogen is removed primarily in your driveway. _ through denitrification In addition to ex- (conversion to nitrogen gas). plaining where nitrogen ison Rates of denitrification vary generated around a typical widely,depending on such home,this fact sheet includes The Nitrogen Cyclei 'r factors as type of soil and a worksheet on page 3 that Plattiptake amount of water added to the actually quantifies your organle Metter ground. annual nitrogen output.The NH4 The problem is that last page is a sampler of \y_ even properly working septic changes you can make to turn tutrete systems do little to remove this number around.We can No, nitrogen.Most of the nitrogen all do our part to help solve a l on hmg leaves the sewage disposal big problem. system absorption area, potentially to enter ground and surface water. Funding for this fact sheet was Before you reach for 3)feeding plants now not later. Municipal sewage provided b the Pennsylvania Y using a form of nitrogen that treatment plants are not P y J the nearest bag h weed'n required b state law to Department of Environmental is water-soluble and thus � Y feed,consider what poor remove nitrogen from sewage Protection with the support of immediately available to theg fertilizer choices can mean for EPA's Section nfi ds.Th nt plant.This can be a poor effluent.Pennsylvania is, Source Pro rhe ands.The your lawn ortheenviron- p p however,studying the 8 h choice if the soil drains easily, Ymg Alliance for the Chesapeake mann allowing nitrogen to leach feasibility of removing Bay is a non-profit organua- 1)bad tinning applying into the ground water.Water- nitrogen at 16 major munid- tion dedicated to involving and fertilizer at the wrong time of soluble ammonium nitrate is pal sewage treatment plants issues ind the its tic abort the year.Spring applications one of the cheapest sources of (called biological nitrogen issues and events that affect to common cool-season g p g removal). the Chesapeake Bay. grasses,such as Kentucky nitrogen in bulk-blend garden 1 HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS Household cleaners for glass,ovens,and vinyl siding driven,however,has nearly doubled over the past 20 years. often contain ammonia,a form of nitrogen.Some containers The net result is only a modest reduction in each automotive use spray or pump nozzles that unavoidably send nitrogen pollutant,except for lead which has dropped by more than particles into the air never reaching their target.Simply 95 percent. rinsing buckets,rags and old containers can send nitrogen- Even your lowly lawn mower and other small gas laden residue to your local sewage treatment plant(which powered engines(chain saws,leaf blowers,weed whackers) does not treat toxics like household cleaners),to a local emit nitrogen oxides and other smog-producing gases. stream via stormwater pipes,or into the ground water According to the EPA,about 5 percent of air pollution comes through the septic system.If household cleaners are harmful from the nation's 89 million lawn mowers,garden tractors, to humans,imagine what such products can do to the tiniest and other gas-powered garden equipment.(Por a leaf of aquatic life. blower,one hour is the equivalent of 34 hours of driving.) Only recently has EPA begun to regulate this type of equip- AIRBORNE NITROGEN ment,setting exhaust emission standards for all new small spark-emission engines. The latest scientific evidence estimates that roughly As for power plants that burn fossil fuels(mostly 30 percent of the nitrogen that enters the Chesapeake Bay coal),requirements under the federal Clean Air Act have led comes from the air.Automobiles and other motor vehicles to a 25 percent reduction in acid rain levels in Pennsylvania account for 36 percent of these airborne deposits,while between 1990 and 1995.The reductions resulted from electric utilities account for 40 percent.Everyone who drives targeted reductions in the emissions,of sulfur dioxide, a car or uses electricity that is generated by fossil fuels is another major contributor to add rain,and nitrogen oxides. partly responsible for this part of the nitrogen pollution problem PET WASTE Both cars and fossil fuel-burning power plants emit nitrogen oxides.Some of the nitrogen oxides are transformed Dumping pet waste in the street or storm sewer or into nitric acid in the atmosphere.This acid then falls to the leaving it to decay near the street will add to water pollution earth in the form of acid precipitation,which has been proven if the next rain or melting snowfall washes it into storm to reduce crop and forest yields,kill fish and other aquatic sewers,which drain directly into our streams,lakes and life,and accelerate the decay of limestone statues,paint and bays.When pet waste is washed into lakes or streams,the metal finishes.If strong enough,add precipitation can burn waste decays,using up oxygen and sometimes releasing human skin,damage lungs,and irritate eyes and breathing ammonia.Low oxygen levels and ammonia combined with functions. warm temperatures can kill fish.Pet waste also contains Today's passsenger cars emit about 70 percent less nutrients that encourage weed and algae growth.Perhaps nitrogen oxides over their lifetimes than their uncontrolled most importantly,pet waste carries disease which make counterparts of the 1960's.The number of cars and miles water unsafe for swimming or drinking. The Trouble with Nitrogen Whatever its source around the home,nitrogen in the water soluble form(nitrate nitrogen)can be washed Into a nearby stream,river or lake through stormwater runoff.In Pennsylvania's freshwater lakes and streams,nitrogen does not usually cousewater quality problems.But,where it flows into the shallow,saltier Chesapeake Bay via the Susquehanna and Potomac Rivers,nitrogen feeds algae like a fertilizer feeds a corn crop.When high amounts of nutrients are present,algae-rapidly multiplies into huge masses called blooms.These floating algae blooms fill the water,blocking sunlight needed by bay grasses which provide food and habitat for many species.As the algae die, they sink and bacteria decomposes the algae In a process that removes oxygen from the water.Without enough oxygen,some species must leave the area.Those that can't leave die. It is Pennsylvania's underground supplies of water most directly impacted by nitrate pollution.Because of its complete solubility,nitrate nitrogen can easily drain downward through some soils and contaminate ground water supplies,an issue of particular concern in Pennsylvania since about 50 percent of the state's population relies on ground water for public and domestic supplies.The contamination is especially acute in areas with limestone or carbonate bedrock (southcenfral and southeastern Pennsylvania). The federal Environmental Protection Agency has set a limit of 10 milligrams of nitrate per liter of groundwater as a safe threshold for drinking water.Higher levels of nitrate can create health problems for humans and animals.The most common problem is methemogtobinemia,or blue-baby syndrome,In which too much nitrogen in the blood can lead to suffocation if not detected in time.The health of young livestock animals can also be affected by high nitrate nitrogen levels in drinking water. ,1 } 1 l " 4ow Yoto. " Worksheet This worksheet examines activities around your home which Automobiles generate nitrogen It focuses on those activities or facilities over which you have at least some control--areas in which choices can be made to reduce nitrogen outputs.It does not reflect how " much nitrogen becomes pollution since some nitrogen is con- sumed by plants for growth or bound in the soil. SPEP 1:Estimate the number of miles driven per week for each of your family's cars and total the miles driven per week. La wn FeMike l"S STEP 2:Multiply this mileage by.004(an approximate average of the pounds of nitrogen oxides emitted by 1996 model cars over one mile). STEP 3:Multiply this number(lbs.N emitted/one week)by 52 weeks/year for an annual amount. Step 1: On the back of the fertilizer bag,note the parts of Total pounds of nitrogen oxides. nitrogen,phosphorus,and potassium per bag.Nitrogen is the first number In the 3-digit formula.A 1211-8 fertilizer,for in. fLawn Tools stance,would contain 12 percent nitrogen on a weight basis. �rJ Step 2:Determine the size of your lawn in square feet.(1 acre= J Nitrogen Oxide Emission Rates: 43,560 square feet). Commercial fertilizers give recommendations lawn mowers-.0D53 Ib/hour for pounds of fertilizer per 1000 square feet.Divide the size of " m rear engine riding mowers-.0163 lb./hour your lawn(in square feet)by 1000 square feet. lctor-.02616./hour Step 3:Determine how many pounds of fertilizer is recom- leaawn/garden tractor f blower/vacuum-.002216./hour snowblower-,006616./hour mended per 1000 square feet.(A typical recommendation woulda be 1.5 lbs.per 1000 sq.ft.)Multiply this number by the factor STEP 1:For each type of equipment noted above,determine how arrived at in step 2. many weeks a year you typically use the equipment. Step 4:Take Step 1's nitrogen figure(the first number in the N-P- STEP 2:For each season,determine how many hours a week each K formula)and multiply by the total pounds of fertilizer arrived tool is typically used. at in step 3.Thts Is the total pounds of nitrogen you're applying STEP 3:For each equipment piece,multiply number of hours/ In one application. week by the total weeks used in one year. Step 5:Multiply the total pounds of nitrogen arrived at in step 4 STEP 4:Sum the totals for each small gas-powered engine. by the number of times a year you fertilize you lawn with flits Total pounds of nitrogen oxides: formula. Total pounds of nitrogen: ! �, ®ectdclty On-Lot%ptic Systems o o• `~ Electric generation plants powered by coal(fossil fuel)emit.0024 a pounds of nitrogen oxides per kilowatt hour of electricity pro- The average amount of nitrogen produced by a person in septic duced. system effluent over one year is estimated to be 9.9 pounds. STEP 1:Over the course of a year,record the kilowatt hours of STEP 1:If you have an on-lot septic system,total the number of electricity used by your household,which is noted on your people living in your household, monthly electric bill. STEP 2 Multiply the number of people in your household by 9.9 STEP 2:Total the year's kilowatt hours and multiply by.0025 for pounds for a total annual amount, an annual amount of nitrogen oxide emissions contributable to Total pounds of nitrogen: your household. —� Total pounds of nitrogen oxides: Household Cleaners 1 U ADD ALL OF THE ABOVE PIGURES: STEP 1:Check which cleaners you routinely use that contain This number is an estimate of how many pounds of ammonia.We will use six ounces as an average per use amount nitrogen-containing compounds your household generates for the typical household. STEP 2:Multiply six ounces by the number of times you use each on a yearly basis. of these cleaners in one year. Read on and you can learn how to reduce that STEP 3:Divide the total by 16 to calculate the number of pounds number by some simple changes in your lifestyle.And here's of each cleaner used in one year. an extra challenge.After reading the"What's a Homeowner to STEP45:Sum the total pounds of ammonia-containing cleaners Do?"section,decide how your family can help reduce the routinely used over one year. nitrogen pollution problem.For one year,try out some new Total pounds of nitrogen-containing cleaners: conservation practices and then re-work the calculations to see what kind of difference you can make. 1 � INN Lawn Care Sewage Management Did you know.. On-lot sewage system risers:Pump your septic tank •A lawn fertilization regularly or the build-up of solids will inhibit the ability of a program should begin in early septic system to do its job right.A rule-of-thumb is to pump r October,not early May? your tank every three years for a four-person hosehold and a -By leaving grass 2500 gallon tank Also,support efforts by your municipality to clippings on the lawn,nitro- adopt a sewage treatment program,which may require periodic ? \ gen applications can be septic tank pumping.Such programs are preventive mainte- reduced by 30-40 percent? nance—if on-lot septic systems are left unmanaged,malfunc- ,. •Healthy trees and tioning systems may force the extension of costly sewer lines for shrubs do not require annual greater distances. pet waste fertilizer applications? Municipal sewage plant users:Support efforts to upgrade •Chemical fertilizers sewage systems that remove nitrogen at the treatment plant.In Management can add salt to the soil and Maryland,nearly all of the state's 61 major sewage treatment When walking a dog,remem- can harm soil structure.High plants will remove nitrogen from treated waste by the year ber to carry a plastic bag and salt concentrations can kill 2000. take the waste back home for soil-building microorganisms proper disposal.At home, and promote soil compaction. there are a few options for Grass clippings and compost Household Cleaners disposal: are better answers,returning Some time-honored agents like borax,baking soda and *Flush wastes down the toilet needed bacteria and enzymes lemon juice can match the cleaning power of most commercial (on-lot systems can remove to the soil along with nutri- some of the nitrogen;munici- ents. cleaning products. pal sewage treatment plants Instead of oven cleaner,by. will not remove the nitrogen 2 Tbs.castile soap,2 ft.borax and — but will remove dangerous (.. 2 C.water,set in oven for 20 pathogens).Be careful not to minutes.OR scrub with baking soda p f tC�;5 flush stones,sticks or cat litter and salt (the cat feces may be scooped Instead of ammonia based cleaners, from the litter and flushed). t *Bury the waste in your yard. u;ndiluted white vinegar in a spray Dig a hole approximately five bottle;herbs can be added to ease — ' inches deep,away from the vinegar smell �— vegetable gardens,wells or -- Instead of abrasive cleaners or — any body of water.Microor- 1 powders,try: e1 U ganisms in the top layer of soil 1 baking soda or borax;rub area with will break down the waste 112 lemon dipped In borax and release nutrients to ' — fertilize nearby plants.Don't Sim le and radical add pet waste to your com- p p 101 I post pile.The compost does tips like these are easily :1 _ not get hot enough to kill the accessible.Call you Coopera- Airborne Nitrogen disease causing organisms in tive Extension Service or .Conserve electricity. Most electric power comes from coal- pet waste. check your local library for burning power plants.If we use less energy,the power plants *Put waste in the trash.This guidance. will burn less coal.And that,in turn,will help reduce nitrogen may be easy,but it is not the The key is to know oxides in the atmosphere. best solution,since waste your soil and know your .use public transportation or car pool to get to work.The taken to a landfill can still fertilizer if,in fad,you need reduced mileage will save parking costs for some people and cause pollution in older, additional nutrients.Take the `,near and tear on your vehicle. unlined pits.Incinerated time to learn some simple .Keep your car tuned-up.Regular tune-ups reduce the amount waste can also emit air landscaping techniques that of hydrocarbons,nitrous oxides and other pollutants coming pollutants. can produce a healthy,green from the exhaust pipe. •Install an underground pet lawn and garden without .Drive less and walk more.For short distances,riding a bike or waste digester.It works like a polluting ground water or walking is a smart option that will help keep you fit. small septic tank and can be surface water. purchased at pet stores.Check For more household tips,call Chesapeake Regional Information Service at 1-800-662-CRIS or local laws that may restrict the Internet at CRIS®igc.apc.org or DEP's Web Site www.dep.state.pa.us(choose information their use,design or location. b sub ect/water mans ement� 1 rl practices,including the siting and sizing of any temporary sediment basins. !� (iz) Temporary practices that will be converted to permanent control measures. (13) Implementation schedule for staging temporary erosion and sediment control practices, including the timing of initial placement and duration that each practice should remain in place. (14) Maintenance schedule to ensure continuous and effective operation of the erosion and sediment control practices. (15) Name(s) of the'potential surface waters of the State of New York and/or the receiving MS4. (16) Delineation of stormwater management control plan implementation responsibilities for each part of the site. (17) Description of structural practices designed to divert flows from exposed soils, store flows, or- otherwise limit runoff and the discharge of pollutants from exposed areas of the site to the degree attainable. (18) Any other existing data that describes the stormwater runoff at the site. (19) The applicant must identify the contractor(s) and subcontractor(s) that will be responsible for installing, constructing, repairing, replacing, inspecting and maintaining the erosion and sediment control practices included in the SWPPP. § 236-18. Performance standards for approval of stormwater management control plan. t A. The site erosion, sedimentation and stormwater runoff control measures shall be appropriate for existing topography,vegetation and other salient natural features of the site.The plan shall indicate that the development will preserve natural features, minimize grading and cut and fill operations, ensure conformity with natural topography, and retain natural vegetation and trees to the maximum extent practicable in order to create the least erosion potential and adequately handle the volume and rate or velocity of surface water runoff. - B. Site grading, excavation and filling shall minimize destruction of natural vegetation, the potential for erosion, sedimentation and stormwater runoff and the threat to the health, safety and welfare of ' neighboring property owners and the general public. C. Erosion, sedimentation and stormwater runoff shall be controlled prior to, during, and after site preparation and construction. During grading operations,appropriate measures for dust control shall be undertaken. D. Areas exposed by site preparation shall be protected during site construction with hay bales,silt fencing, temporary vegetation and/or mulching to meet the requirements of the NYSDEC Erosion Control Manual. E. Natural drainage patterns shall be protected and incorporated into site design. Where natural drainage patterns are demonstrated to be adversely affecting a beach or surface waters of the State of New York, as defined herein,drainage patterns may be altered in a manner which reduces the threat to such beach or surface waters of the State of New York, as defined herein, and does not create other flooding or erosion problems. 2 F. Site preparation, including stripping of vegetative cover and grading, shall be undertaken so that no r individual building site is stripped of its vegetation cover more than 3o days prior to commencement of r construction'. Soils exposed or disturbed by site preparation shall remain so for the shortest practical period of time during site clearing,construction and restoration. G. Disturbed soils shall be stabilized and revegetated or seeded as soon as practicable. During the interim, erosion protection measures such as temporary vegetation, retention ponds, recharge basins, berming, silt traps and mulching shall be used to ensure that sedimentation is minimized and mitigated. H. In no case shall stormwater be diverted to another property either during site preparation or after development. In appropriate cases, with the approval of the Superintendent of Highways, drainage control measures may be implemented in the right-of-way attendant to an adjacent Town highway,at the applicants expense. I. During the construction period, disposal of stormwater runoff generated by development activity shall be handled on site. Baling, mulching, debris basins, silt traps, silt fencing, use of fibrous cover materials' or similar measures shall be used to contain soil erosion on the site. J. All projects, regardless of the area of groundwater removal and/or grading, shall retain a natural vegetative buffer zone along water bodies, including wetlands and marshes, as may be required by Chapter 275 by the Board of Trustees.'] If necessary, other forms of erosion control measures will also be included. [1] Editor's Note:See Ch.275, Wetlands and Shoreline. K. Natural land features such as shallow depressions shall be used, wherever possible, to collect stormwater on site for recharge. L. Site designs shall minimize impermeable paving. M. Stormwater runoff shall not be directly discharged to surface waters of the State of New York, as defined herein. Stormwater pollutants shall not be discharged directly into a surface water of the State of New York, as defined herein, but shall be attenuated by using holding ponds, sedimentation basins, perimeter berming, vegetated buffer areas and other measures that reduce flow velocity and increase storage time. Pollutants shall not be discharged into wetlands. In addition, any filtering devices constructed as part of the drainage system must be adequately maintained in order to function properly. N. All wetland vegetation shall be maintained. Dredging and site construction should not disturb wetlands either by direct removal of vegetation or substrate or by the alteration of adjacent slopes that would undermine the stability of the substrate unless permitted by Chapter 275. Grading equipment shall not be allowed to enter into or cross any watercourse or wetland without an approved SWPPP, Department approval,or in compliance with Chapter 275. O. Subsurface sediments shall be maintained to provide structural support for the soils of the wetlands. P. The elevation of a wetland shall not be altered unless it is part of a wetland restoration project approved by the Town and/or the Department. Q. No vegetation required by any agency as a buffer to a natural protective feature shall be disturbed by grading,erosion,sedimentation,or direct removal of vegetation. R. Fill shall not encroach on natural watercourses,constructed channels,wetlands,or floodway areas.All fill shall be compacted at a final angle of repose which provides stability for the material, minimizes erosion and prevents settlement. All temporary stockpiles and/or graded areas shall be protected with erosion control measures to include, but not be limited to, hay bales, silt fencing; and vegetation to meet the minimum requirements of the New York State Stormwater Design Manual. S. Trails and walking paths along water bodies shall be sited and constructed so they are not a source of sediment,as may be required by Chapter 2751']and/or as part of an approved SWPPP. [2] Editor's Note:See Ch.275, Wetlands and Shoreline. T. The amount and velocity of runoff from a site after development shall approximate its predevelopment characteristics. However, if the site is adjacent to coastal waters,stormwater shall be contained on site, to the maximum extent practicable,to prevent direct discharge of runoff to coastal waters. U. Natural floodplains and drainage swales shall not be altered or disturbed in a manner which decreases their ability to accommodate and channel stormwater runoff and floodwaters. If no practicable alternative to the location of development, roadway, driveways, and similar surfaces within these areas exists,such facilities shall be sited and constructed to minimize and mitigate the amount and'velocity of stormwater entering the channel, floodplain or swale and to approximate the original functions of the undisturbed condition. V. No land having a slope equal to or greater than 20% shall be developed or disturbed except for conservation measures or measures intended to remove debris which inhibits the functioning of natural or engineered drainage and erosion control measures except accessways to shorelines permitted by Chapter 275. Natural vegetation and topography shall be retained to stabilize soils and reduce the volume of stormwater overflow. W. On lands having slopes of less than 2o% but composed of highly erodible soils, development proposals shall include consideration of the load-bearing capacity of the soils. Unless it can be demonstrated that the soils can be stabilized with a minimum of on-site disturbance and no adverse impacts to the stability of neighboring properties,the development proposal shall not be approved as submitted. X. All permanent and/or final vegetation and mechanical erosion control measures called for in approved plans shall be installed within the time limits specified by the Stormwater Management Officer, and no later than the time limits specified by the Stormwater Management Officer or noted in the stormwater management control plan. Article III. Additional Requirements § 236-19. Activities covered. A. Construction activities that discharge or potentially discharge stormwater to surface waters, whether directly or via an MSq,and that fall within any one of the below categories will require the submission of an SWPPP as set forth in § 236-2oC(l) of this chapter which includes only erosion and sediment controls. (1) Construction activities that involve soil disturbance of one or more acres of land but less than five acres: (a) Single-family residential subdivisions with twenty-five-percent or less impervious cover at total site build-out; (b) Construction of a barn or other agricultural building,silo,stockyard or pen;and (c) Single-family homes that do not meet any of the thresholds set forth in§236-igB. (2) The following construction activities that involve soil disturbances of one or more acres of land: USGS Orient Harbor Water Analysis Nitrate, Water in situ, milligrams per liter as nitrogen (DIN) (Last 12 full months of data approved for publication) EPA Criterion:GOOD(<.1 mg/liter) EPA Criterion:FAIR(.1 to<.5 mg/Itr) EPA Criterion: Poor(.5+mg/liter) Time Data Readings Data Readings Mean/Day Max/Day Data Readings Mean/Day Max/Day Data Readings Mean/Day Max/Day Period =# # % #Days %Days #Days %Days # % #Days* %Days #Days* %Days # % #Days I%Days #Days''* °°Days May 2017 1422 31 1414 99% 31 100% 24 77% 8 0.56% 0 0% 7 20% 0 0% 0 0% June 2017 1255 30 1247 99% 30 100% 24 80% 8 0.64% 0 0% 6 6% 0 0% 0 0% o July 2017 1153 31 1151 100% 31 100% 29 94% 2 0.17% 0 0% 2 6% 0 0% 0 0 0° Aug.2017 1259 7 3.259 100% 7 100% 7 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Sept.2017 0 0 0 Oct.2017 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0% Nov.2017 1287 29 1287 100% 29 100% 29 100% 0 0% 0 0% Dec.2017 842 31 842 100% 31 100% 31 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Jan.2018 797 1 23 791 99% 23 100% 19 83% 6 0.75% 0 0% 4 17% 0 0% 0 0% Feb.2018 455 1 11 454 100% 11 100% 10 91% 1 0.22% 0 0% 1 9% 0 0% 0 0% Mar,2018 1431 31 1429 100% 31 100% 29 94% 2 0.14% 0 0% 12 6% 0 0% 0 0% Apr.2018 1431 30 1414 99% 29 97% 25 83% 15 1.05% 1 3% 1 4 • 1 13% 2 0.0014 0 0% 1 3% Total 111332 254 11288 99.6% 253 99.6% 227 89% 42 0.37%11 1 0.39%1 26 1 10% 2 0.02% 0 0% 1 0.4% Detail of Fair and Poor Readings *Fair mg/Itr: Mean Reading: April'18:(0.13) Max Reading: May'17:(4@ 0.10),(1@ 0.11),(1@ 0.12),(1@0.13) June'17:(4@ 0.10),(1@ 0.12),(1@ 0.14) July'17:(1@ 0.10),(1@ 0.11) Jan.'18:(3@ 0.10), (1@ 0.11) Feb.'18: (1@ 0.10) Mar.'18:(2@ 0.10) Apr.'18:(2@ 0.10),(1@ 0.11),(1@ 0.16) *Poor ma/Itr: Max Reading: Apr.'18:(1@ 0.52) 2018-Aug DEIS USGS Nitrate Data.xlsx t USGS 01304200 ORIENT HARBOR AT ORIENT NY 9.76 0.60 �o 9.56 ^� v = 0 0.40 � L 0.30 0.20 L 6.19 •'I m 0.09 �v s v -9.16 -6.26 May 61Jun 01Jul Mug 61Sep Ojoct 91Hov eflec 91Jan 61Feb OMar 61Rpr 011ay 61 a 2917 2617 2917 2017 2917 2917 2917 2617 2618 2918 2618 2918 2918 ---- Nitrate - � Period of approved data EPR Poor Ecological Condition Criterion for DIN -- -- EPR Fair Ecological Condition Criterion for DIN USGS 01304200 ORIENT HARBOR AT ORIENT NY L 0.25 aLo 0_20 6.15 = o L I a 0.10 6,65 Id Kill I I 311� j c L C 0.00 L 14 -4 s -0.05 -0.10 L May May May May z 06 13 20 27 2017 2017 2017 2017 --- Nitrate ..� Period of approved data EPR Fair Ecological Condition Criterion for DIN HlKti USGS 01304200 ORIENT HARBOR AT ORIENT NY 0.25 0.20 ^+ c �.� 0.15 = o L 0.10 0.05 L �W4 , 0.80 ? -0.05 -0.'10 �o L 4� Jun Jun Jun Jun Jul = 03 10 17 24 01 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 —~ Nitrate Period of approved data EPR Fair Ecological Condition Criterion for DIN USGS 01304200 ORIENT HARBOR AT ORIENT NY 0.25 L 0.20 47A y 0.15 = o N 0.10 4J .m c N y 0.05 ,{ a� 0.00 L 4J•"'i -0.05 s y -0.10 L *' Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul 01 Q8 15 22 29 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 Nitrate = Period of approved data EPA Fair Ecological Condition Criterion for DIN USGS 01304200 ORIENT HARBOR AT ORIENT NY 26.0 25.5 78.0 s Q1 L 25.0 77`0 a� y 49 U 24.50 76.0 L O O a. a� 24.0 75.0 0 s a23.5 4.j 74.0 i m 23.0 rip 73.0 m L +� o. 22`5 asi 72.0 oa ~ 22.0 m Aug Aug Aug Rug 05 12 19 26 2017 2017 2017 2017 --- Tenperature Period of approved data IMUSGS USGS 01304200 ORIENT HARBOR AT ORIENT NY 0.25 ro 0.20 ao C 0.15 t X10 L 0.10 4j� = ©.05 47 41 to IR11""m"T1111 11"Ir,ME?IRPI 1 11 R1111 11 1111W I 11F11111 r 11 F1 11 11 IfIll?11"C ©.430 L -+ -0.05 �o s -0.10 (U L -0.15 Nov Nov Nov Nov = 04 11 18 25 2017 2017 2017 2017 -- Nitrate Period of approved data EPR Fair Ecological Condition Criterion for DIN USGS 01304200 ORIENT HARBOR AT ORIENT NY L 0.20 L u 0_15 0 0.10 4j� ..� c 0.05 �`o' ��1�nr��tiin� r�tj•r,�r���ntr�.�u�-�►t�llll iti�.r'. � �rl�rri�iir�n��r��1h 1t .� L 0.00 w;� —0.05 +.) fo _ -0.10 (U -0.15 Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec = 02 09 16 23 30 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 - Nitrate Period of approved data EPR Fair Ecological Condition Criterion for DIN USGS 01304200 ORIENT HARBOR AT ORIENT NY L 0.25 L 0.20 �A .r{ y 0.15 = ao 0.10 C0.05 '� _�Atrtt f1 aLi 0.00 *' -0.05 s as -0.10 L 1i Jan Jan Jan Jan x 06 13 20 27 2018 2018 2018 2018 -- Nitrate Period of approved data EPA Fair Ecological Condition Criterion for DIN USGS 01304200 ORIENT HARBOR AT ORIENT NY 0.70 0.60 a� 0.50 = 0 0.40 L 0.30 c� 0.20 c +; 0.10 _ L„i 0.00 0 3 -0.10 3u 1 -0.20 eo Apr Apr Apr Apr 07 14 21 28 2018 2018 2018 2018 — Nitrate Period of approved data EPA Poor Ecological Condition Criterion for DIN EPA Fair Ecological Condition Criterion for DIN L' USGS 01304200 ORIENT HARBOR AT ORIENT NY 0.25 0.20 0.15 `.� 0.10 _ .._.. .........._ 0.05 N VJ C � L 0.00 L i -0.05 s -0.10 as L -0.15 Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar a 03 10 17 24 31 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 -- Nitrate Period of approved data EPR Fair Ecological Condition Criterion for DIN USGS 01304200 ORIENT HARBOR AT ORIENT NY 0.25 L 0.20 ao 0.15 z ao 0.10 c 0.05 L 0.00 L� „^+ -0.05 s v -0.10 L -0.15 Feb Feb Feb Feb z 03 10 17 24 2018 2018 2018 2018 Nitrate Period of approved data EPR Fair Ecological Condition Criterion for DIN 'e rhe USGS Water Science School ;Search... Search , �Back toprevious page _ Water Questions & Answers How much water does the average person use at home per day? Estimates vary, but each person uses about 80-100 gallons of water per day. Are you surprised that the largest use of household water is to flush the toilet, and after that, to take showers and baths? That is why, in these days of water conservation, we are , { starting to see toilets and showers that use less water than before. I Many local governments now have laws that specify that water f ! faucets, toilets, and showers only allow a certain amount of water flow per minute. Water agencies in some areas, such as here in Atlanta, Georgia, offer rebates if you install a water-efficient toilet. -- — ---------_ --- ----____ In fact, I just put in two new toilets and received a rebate of$100 for each. Yes, they really do use a lot less water. For your kitchen and bathroom faucets, if you look real close at the head of a faucet, you might see something like "1.0 gpm", which means that the faucet head will allow water to flow at a maximum of 1.0 gallons per minute. NOTE: Our data here is very general in nature...just to give you a quick idea of your water use. There are some other Web sites that will give you a much more detailed and accurate estimate of your per- capita water use: • WECalc • CSGNetwork • Southwest Florida Water Management District Typical water use at home Bath I A "full tub" varies, of course, but 36 gallons is good average amount. t i Tip: Taking a shower instead of a bath should save a good bit of water. I Shower Old showers used to use up to 5 gallons of water per minute. Water- { saving shower heads produce about 2 gallons per minute. Tip: Taking a shorter shower using a low-flow showerhead saves lots of water. i Teeth <1 gallon. Newer bath faucets use about 1 gallon per minute, whereas brushing f older models use over 2 gallons. Tip: Simply turn the faucet off when brushing teeth. Hands/face 1 gallon washing i Tip: Simply turn the faucet off before drying your hands and face. If you don't mind a brisk wash, don't run the faucet until it gets hot ' before using it. Installing a faucet-head aerator will al.o reduce the water flow rate. ' Face/leg ._ 1 galfon___._R„�___„____.��_.�.e�._�,__,x.-... shaving Tip: Simply turn the faucet off when shaving. Dishwasher I 6-16 gallons. Newer, EnergyStar models use 6 gallons or tress per wash_ Y\'r cycle, whereas older dishwashers might use up to 16 gallons per cycle. i f Tip: EnergyStar dishwashers not only save a lot of water but also save y electricity. Dish About 8-27 gallons. This all depends on how efficient you are at hand- washing by j washing dishes. Newer kitchen faucets use about 1.5-2 gallons per ; t hand:, i minutes, whereas older faucets use more. Tip: Efficient hand-washing techniques include installing an aerator in your faucet head and scraping food off, soaking dishes in a basin of i soapy-water before getting started, and not letting the water run while I I you wash every dish. And it's best to have two basins to work in--one I with hot, soapy water and the other with warm water for a rinse. Clothes 1 25 gallons/load for newer washers. Older models might use about 40 f washer gallons per load. I i f Tip: EnergyStar clothes washers not only save a lot of water but also save electricity. Toilet flush 3 gallons. Most all new toilets use 1.6 gallons per flush, but many older toilets used about 4 gallons. i Tip: Check for toilet leaks! Adjust the water level in your tank. But, best to install a new low-flow toilet.. Glasses of 8 oz. per small glass (not counting water for Fido or your cats). Also, x water you note that you will be using water for cooking. ' drank 1 I Outdoor 2 gallons per minute, depending on the force of your outdoor faucet. watering i This may not sound like too much but the large size of lawns and yards means outdoor water use can be-a significant use of water. j U.S.Department of the Interior I U.S.Geological Survey URL:http://water.usgs.gov/edu/qa-home-percapita.html Page Contact Information:Howard Perlman Page Last Modified:Friday,o2-Dec-201612:52:14 EST r O 1 y Custom Search Communications Foundation CALCU LATOR GRACE's Water Footprint Calculator(available in English and Spanish)helps you estimate your daily water use. Through a series of simple questions about everyday routines,this innovative and engaging calculator accounts for not only the water you use from the tap, but also the water it takes to produce the food you eat,the energy you use and the products you buy. Now,we've made our site even better!We've added new content about major issues in water use and created re- sources that help educators teach students about their water footprint.Plus,we offer over 100 of the best water saving tips to help you reduce your use. GO Started Irm Learn more about water footprints 0 En Espanol: �Cual es su Huella Hidrica? Sign-up for .._ .. . , . .• - , r - _.,. 4tli: T1atft'StelteFS! Home Email us vary and Terms of Use Food Program Newsletter Content Request Water Signup Sitemap Ececentric Blog Newsletter Archive About Facebook Grants Twitter Pinlerest histogram GRACE Communications Foundation 215 Lexington Avenue.New York,NY 10016 United Slates Tel:212 726 9161 0 2018 GRACE Communications Foundation A project of the ; A Alliax-licefioWater Efficiency ho eW t rwork5 Calculator Water Conservation Tips Indoor Water Use Landscape&Irrigation Water&Energy About Us I t Home Water Calculator How much water do I use? How do I compare? How can I conserve? Home water conservation is easy once you understand how and where you can use less The quick and easy Water Calculator shows you which water uses in your home are efficient and which are not and offers simple i 1 conservation tips that save water and energy. How much Pin ` "mater do you use? Now we have enough info to measure your carbon footprint Click here to learn more and then get your final results i Percent Complete ! The Water Calculator compares your water use to a similar average and efficient house in your region. The Water Calculator estimates the energy savings and carbon footprint of your hot water usage,and helps identify specific areas for improving overall household water efficiency.Water conservation is easy and the Water ; Calculator gets you started right away. s About the Water Calculator j The Water Calculator Is a collaborative project of the Alliance for Water Efficiencv_and The Field Museum and was made possible by a grant from the Home Depot Foundation. i CALCULATOR Learn more about how the Water Calculator works here. The Water Calculator is designed to be compatible with the most modem browsers;However,if you are using Internet Explorer 7 or older we recommend that you update your browser software to take full advantage of the Water Calculator's features. 1 c Privacy Policy I Terms of Use 1 0 2018 Alliance for Water Efficiency,NFP.All Rights Reserved 1 rr Vc- 8uffolk. Water Corhmissioners' • • HOME MEMBER ACCESS GALLERY • a AW Discussing 1.4 Dioxane ^ „ Parliamentary Procedure Discussed ................................................................. := - Training on Value of Internal Audits _ y_ * l`r; Infrastructure Discussed "' New NSWCA Commissioners,Welcomed{ Q ZZZZZZZZ- } ^+: ;'."41v, =e'..r �w.'tl3°% k�z,� R `•'i'q'�,,,i.�,.-�..ytL iv r"'..,q' .,? hater Facts Our Long Island Aquifers: The Basics I 10 Summer Water Tig_s Ways to reduce water,' Residents of Nassau and Suffolk counties typically enjoy superior quality water and a plentiful supply. f consumption and conserve during summer months Meticulously managed and highly regulated,both counties draw drinking water from a sole source,a r .. system of aquifers beneath the surface of the island.The protection,maintenance and long-term sustainability of the aquifers are vital concerns of the NSWCA. gtN° Spring Conservation YRAW CLOUDCtattt9PGttMTJ 101mportant Spring Tips For r YK ; W ater Conservation ,� kY -'','�x � to f;• W�_Lnti 43. i }( v{ {��, LY n'• j �ASE'�`tiAELP� {� iiii ��� h, If F't Brrr112winterizingTps 12 Useful Water Tips For The Winter Months .Y, R-- OC@A!Y .r� z+ -� GREPH AIM i'4$�'' : .*��;>'a': Y,..e's. ,,.ate: �.r�:,`•.r"4.<,' {�. _ „t - _ g'."'ua ,�a:`K, t �. Lon sland Aquifers Basic facts and answers to `£�"°'°si�'-,fsu.f?•,�'.^:,,'<...�-`a'' -•,i'�"f r:'.;"y,'.`;.i:,-,-a�,t' tig`4frequentiyaskedquestions `x.,«_.i<�,�`v_fA�•"„,°eG ? Fr<. r'e 4.7,"e,^R,r "O C �: y - ._ - -_ '.:?;r"`;^➢ �`S` ..'Y v;, ;^'.,-Yy:: A_wR^�""' a�"*iC� fn iy�`✓�y<,`.w.�ar- ,y�'lc^°.ai.�1'F...�)k*,�,� `�j.,�''y,;,?`3�ryv i Bottled Water:A close ua look • ?`$x.-'-r�.."F."" a��'„'..- -:�%;�., -'b,�: 5 �,� ."�'�•s>s•<,=_sey R�.�'"Yr`'*. .-� R 71.'2;:+z.�'kµ ,�-- Is bottled water really a good �dea7Ma be not if you y'r Y Y =t;.:,•'�r�<=.r:,�.: ,�.'=`,. �.<'• ',4n examine the facts.Here are 10 rtA'( °a •- "`*'_ ; Pc'.^: -� n �'v 4e»i,kf�''•'� _ ��''•i yy�41�,F^*.�TN .i'�'_,[� �:�j;t•.+ur,?:4,1",-x. _'�k+: �`y�'�'".f n'-�n"''�Y' ry«;»�i-`r 9 verysur surprising statistics. .. !ry;, Vii•' -yr �>,' ":" t, }t< "4 f i The following are some basic facts and answers to frequently asked questions that the NSWCA receives. _ o 1. What Is Hydrogeology? This is a branch of the earth sciences in the area of geology that deals with the distribution and movement of groundwater. f 2. What is an aquifer?Essentially,an aquifer is an underground geologic formation, scall -r-q 9 9 typically Is composed of permeable rock and/or unconsolidated gravel,sand,pebbles or silt Aquifers contain, transmit and yield water in usable quantities.The aquifer formations beneath Long Island were deposited at different times in the island's geologic history. Also related are Aquitards and Aquicludes. Acquitards are clay units that have very low permeability, minimizing water exchange between the layers of an aquifer. Aquicludes(or aquifuges)are solid impermeable areas that overlay an aquifer. Layers of clay between certain aquifer layers retard some water movement beneath Long Island.The aquifers slope toward the southern part of the island.This causes the deepest parts of the aquifers and the groundwater system to reside along the southern shore of Long Island,and to extend out into the subsurface material beneath the Atlantic ocean floor. 3. The Three Major Long Island Aquifers:Nassau and Suffolk counties obtain their drinking water from three major aquifers underlying Long Island which constitute a sole source aquifer. The aquifers are,from the shallowest to the deepest,the Upper Glacial,the Magothy and the Lloyd aquifers. One minor aquifer,the Jameco is also in use. A. The Upper Glacial Aquifer:Formed during the last ice age,the Upper Glacial is the aquifer closest to the surface.The youngest aquifer formation,the Upper Glacial,was laid down during the last Ice Age, 10-15 million years ago.It contains sands,pebbles,rocks and occasionally boulders,carried to Long Island and left behind by the glaciers.The water table,meaning the top of the groundwater system,is found in the Upper Glacial aquifer. B. The Magothy Aquifer:The largest of Long Island's aquifers.Consisting of sand deposits alternating., with clay,it attains a maximum thickness of approximately 1,100 feet and is the source of water for most of Nassau County and about half of Suffolk County.The formation can be seen in the coastal bluffs of the north shore and plunges under the land surface to the south.The sand and gravel of the Magothy aquifer was deposited in the upper Cretaceous Period,about 50-80 million years ago. The Magothy aquifer supplies more than 90%of the water used in Nassau County and about 50%of the water used in Suffolk County. C. The Lloyd Aquifer: Underlain by a bed of igneous and metamorphic bedrock dating from the Precambrian Era,the Lloyd Aquifer is the oldest and deepest of Long Island's aquifers. The Lloyd's sand deposits A sand and gravel formation ranging in thickness up to 500 feet thick,the deposits were laid down in the Cretaceous Period,about 80-100 million years ago. The Lloyd aquifer is 1,800 feet below the surface at its deepest point and the water it contains is about six thousand years old. The Lloyd aquifer is found at depths averaging 200-300 feet along the north shore.Along the south shoreline the Lloyd aquifer is approximately 1,500 feet below the land surface.New York Environmental Conservation Law§15-1528 established a moratorium on the use of water from this formation to maintain it for future generations. In addition to the aquifers,the Raritan Formation,a clay deposit averaging 100-200 foot thickness, separates and confines the Magothy and Lloyd aquifers. It has two primary units:An upper clay member and a lower sand member called the Lloyd Sand.The clay member reaches a maximum thickness of 300 feet. 4. Our Groundwater Reliance:Nassau and Suffolk counties utilize a sole source aquifer. Long Island is not alone in having groundwater as a source of drinking water. Across the USA,some 100 million Americans utilize groundwater for their drinking water. 5. Recharging Our Aquifers:Our aquifers are among the USAs most prolific,containing an estimated 90 trillion gallons of fresh water.All Long Island aquifers receive their fresh water from precipitation, averaging some 44 inches of precipitation per annum.Surface water from precipitation and snowmelt serves to continually recharge/replenish Long Island's aquifers. Surface water progresses through hundreds of feet of closely packed sand,gravel,pebbles and soil,and is filtered of most impurities before reaching the aquifers.Precipitation and snowmelt replenish more water than is pumped out annually,but without meticulous day-today oversight and management,that could change. P.O.:. .AllRights .. sm(C'IC])-NT 3, Gl[�'_.-OTUIN iWATIER, RIESOUIR, CIES 3.1.2.9 Sea Level Rise Summary Water balances developed using the Main Body and East End groundwater flow models confirm that recharge greatly exceeds water supply pumping rates, and the County's aquifer system can continue to meet current and projected rates of water supply pumping on a County-wide basis. CIRecharge greatly exceeds Nevertheless, fresh supplies are limited in some coastal areas, including water supplypumping Shelter Island, as described further in Section 4. The water b9ances also and the County's aquifer identify the net loss of baseflow to area streams and to coastal areas in those system can-continue to . parts of the County where water supply pumping is not returned to the aquifer meet current and via on-site septic systems or small sewage treatment plants discharging to projected water supply recharge beds. Potential impacts of development on streams, ponds,wetlands pumping rates on a," and inter-tidal areas are best considered on a localized basis, considering area County-wide basis but , water supply pumping, development and stormwater management _freshsupplies are limited" approaches,and sanitary wastewater management. in some coastal dreas" While there are many uncertainties associated with the impacts of climate such as Shelter Island. change, published research and the results of Global Climate Models consistently indicate that sea level will continue to rise at an accelerated pace. Additional evidence indicates that precipitation is increasing in this part of the world, and that the number of extreme precipitation events is also increasing in the northeastern United States, including Suffolk County. In the coming decades,Suffolk County will need to address the impacts of projected increases in sea level elevation.The impacts of rising sea level could be very significant in coastal areas and along the forks, with significant implications for water supply, storm water and sanitary waste management, as well as more widespread flooding. The impacts of sea level rise on the location of the saltwater interfaces must also be monitored and addressed from a water supply The impacts of climate- perspective. The impacts of both sea level rise and more frequent extreme change,including sea precipitation events should also be monitored so that wastewater and level-rise,may be stormwater runoff management strategies can be developed and implemented. significant;particularly in Potential implications for wastewater management are described in more coastal areas.. Impacts on detail in Section 8 of this document. salt water interfaces, - - wastewatermanagement_ 3-2 Groundwater Resource Management and storr►iwaterrunoff-__ (Goals and Objectives must betonsid&�q - Working together with the Steering Committee,a set of groundwater resource management goals and objectives was identified, as summarized on Table 3- 28. These goals and objectives are targeted to protect and manage groundwater quality and quantity through ao3o.Although it is acknowledged that full achievement of these goals within the next twenty years may not be realized,implementation of the recommendations presented in Section 3.3 will March 2o15 SUI FOLK COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE WAI ER RESOURCLS MANAGEMENT PLANT 3-135 BlEcC7['1[ONT 3 (GIR.OIU[N D NAVA TIEIR. RJESOURCIES It is recommended that SCDHS consider addition of new monitoring points in uncharacterized zones of the deeper aquifers,such as coastal areas of the north shore, and the Magothy and Lloyd aquifers on the south shore, as time and resources allow. Comprehensive sampling of the wells identified on Figure 3- 49 and Table 3-31 should occur on an annual basis. The upper glacial wells have been selected to be generally consistent with the percentage of each major land use type present in Suffolk County at this time, as summarized on Table 3-3z. This sampling should be further coordinated with the surface water monitoring described in Section 5. All samples should be analyzed by the SCDHS Public and Environmental Health Laboratory, for the list of contaminants identified in Table 3-3o,above. 3.4.1.3 Saltwater Intrusion Monitoring There are several areas of potential saltwater intrusion, primarily located on the North and South Forks,on Shelter Island,and in other coastal areas of the North Shore. In addition,the saltwater interface in the Magothy aquifer along the south shore is currently located offshore south of the barrier island. The saltwater interface is believed to be slowly moving northward as a result of the long term increase in sea level over the past 18,000 years,as the system moves r towards a new equilibrium. Saltwater intrusion is a relatively slow moving occurrence, with rates of advance generally in the tens of feet per year. The slow advance, combined with the relatively sharp transition from saltwater to fresh water, makes c tracking the advance particularly challenging. For most SCWA well locations, upconing is also an important consideration. As of 2o14, SCWA closely monitors wells at thirteen wellfields for chlorides and/or specific conductance; these results are reported to NYSDEC. It is recommended that SCDHS site two saltwater intrusion outpost wells in each of the areas of potential future saltwater intrusion,with one or more wells located as close to the current position of the zone of transition as possible, and one situated between the nearest public supply or group of private wells and the estimated position of the saltwater— fresh water interface. Saltwater intrusion monitoring wells should be constructed of PVC, to allow electromagnetic induction logging along the entire casing to identify any zones of saltwater intrusion. The wells should be screened near the bottom of the aquifer being monitored. In-situ measurements of specific conductance at saltwater interface sentinel wells using instruments such as the Solinst Levelogger® and associated telemetry system or equivalent would provide useful and timely information relating'any movement of the saltwater interface in response to increased March 2o15 SIJhPOI.K COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE WATER.RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN 13-178 9]E�C7C`ION 3 �131L -O►tU[NJDNVVAT]ER )KIESQ UIRC]E water supply or irrigation pumping to' allow for prompt response if appropriate.Alternatively, sampling could be conducted on a quarterly basis, with all samples analyzed for chlorides. Table 3-32 Monitoring Wells and Suffolk County Land Uses Number of Well List fNYSDEC IDE Land Use Type Monitoring Wells or .- LoivDensk'v-A sidential_ r..9,- .+i 1512;- 53, 46962 's' 48438,-48580-5z5S2; 7 S_896-7,'_6i 45,78V637 t f kl iium`Densitv-Resideniigl-=-'- 15_ '; z2666, 45 212;=46184; -5157- 8 52649 :533?9,,. 64853; 665k 92395 HighDensityResidential: 3:K: =- Y;-47974;^`6 0 6 16 - 5 35 , 4? -Y'4775 4535_-ie? ?Commercial/Industrial/Utilities'` 67539 Institutional __ : ::" - 2 :, 6' "' o- _ j ( = 47. 75 .4..4`, 43 h,0~en3 ace. 3,7 n --. ukr -8 '_-r8io g: .p . .P 3 ,'; 43.N ,, _ -- 474-472 18,` 47?32; _48437:48583;~66134;_ 67553,-,69934,,--75441,'w, .92403 : _= _ _ _= Agriculture: _ ;5 J} _= A.1o990;-,4 84i6;=51567; 5i580,X71573, r Vacant 4774, 47_=97667538 _ s,;.72781,. Looking ahead to the future, airborne electromagnetic (AEM) geophysics is a relatively new technique that has been used to identify saltwater intrusion in freshwater coastal aquifers in Australia and Italy. Airborne electromagnetics March 2015 SUFFOLK COUNTY CONIPREHENSRVF WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN I 3-179 z q]E(Q7['][ON 3 f ;_�0�UNID���\'7[']El ,- R]EScQ►lU[IE�cQ]E� u ; can increase the data quality and coverage of the occurrence of saline groundwater in tidal and coastal areas, lagoons, estuaries, and river deltas while reducing the acquisition costs and time. The application of airborne electromagnetics for groundwater monitoring and modeling has increased in the past decade due to better systems and processing and inversion methodologies. Airborne electromagnetic systems have increased their penetrating power and their data quality,and application to depths below 300 feet exist (Viezzoli et al, 2oog). To date, no successful applications have been identified in the United States, and little about its applicability in developed areas with surface interference has been published. The development and application of Airborne Electromagnetics technology to regional saltwater intrusion studies should be tracked, as it could have potential application for the North and South Forks. 3.4.1.4 Special Studies Monitoring The County-wide groundwater quality trend monitoring program described above should be kept completely separate from monitoring associated with known or expected areas of contamination so that regional trends, or broader relationships between land use and water quality can be better established.For areas that have been identified as areas of concern, targeted monitoring programs should be established or continued. Wells associated with these areas should have a different identifier,and sampling should be targeted to the specific contaminants that are associated with each area. Special studies areas are described in more detail below. Agricultural Area Monitoring—Agricultural monitoring would be primarily focused on the forks. The existing network of shallow monitoring wells in Aquebogue, Jamesport, Orient, Sagaponack and Water Mill that have been sampled on a quarterly basis for nitrates since March 2oo3 should continue to be sampled and analyzed in March, June, September and December. In addition to nitrates and pesticides,the crop(s)planted in the upgradient fields should be noted during the growing season sampling events, as nutrient requirements and downgradient nitrogen levels are lmown to be crop-specific. This sampling will be important to assess the effectiveness of AEM programs, and to identify any additional nitrogen and pesticide control needs. These wells can overlap with the regional water quality network of wells. The number of agricultural wells used in the regional quality study should be limited to approximately five, to maintain the same ratio of agricultural wells to total wells sampled as the ratio of agricultural land use to total land area. March 2015 Surro.K COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RrsOURCrS MANAGEMENT PIAN 13-180 Jul� � �a � g RC, q W V) Home(http://suffolkcountynygov/row/Home.aspx) Reclaim Our water • Homeowners(http://suffolkcountyny.gov/row/Fiomeowners.aspx) Septic improvement Program (http://suffolkcountyny.gov/row/SepticlmprovementPrograrrLaspx) Industry(http://suffolkcountynygov/row/Industryaspx) Regulatory(http://suffolkcountyny.gov/row/Regulatory.aspx) Technical(httpJ/suffolkcountyny.gov/row/Technical.aspx) Infrastrucmre(http://suffolkcountyny.gov/row/Infi-astracture.aspx) Contact(http://suffolkcountyny.gov/row/ContaCLaspx) • Septic , Program Septic Improvement Program Overview i Links: Nitrogen pollution from cesspools and septic systems has been identified as the largest single cause of degraded water YouTube Video on Septic quality contributing to beach closures,restrictions on shellfishing,toxic algae blooms,and massive fish kills.A Improvement Program conventional onsite septic system was never designed to remove nitrogen.The average residential septic system Ott ps://wwwyoutube com/watch? dischar es a roximately 40 pounds of nitro en er ear.For homeowners close to surface waters in Suffolk County y J M1os7Folo) nitrogen can rapidly—r—eacE­su_rEc_eWters where it contributes to degradation of our marshes,bays,and beaches.Even Stuc Improvement Pro Fs inland,nitrogen from septic systems will eventually reach the groundwater and surface waters. p ' (/Portals/60/docs/SenticImproveme Thousands of parcels are currently served by polluting cesspools and septic systems,but will never connect to a sewer1T.p system.Reversing degradation of water quality will depend on replacement of existing systems with new,individual Overview of Provisionally Approved Innovative and Alternative Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems(I/A OWTS). Technolog3ess Over the past several years,Suffolk County has assertively set the stage for the transition to the use of these new (/Portals/60/docs/Overview%20ofZ2 systems.To make the cost of I/A systems that remove nitrogen to protect water quality more affordable for Rules and Regulations homeowners,Suffolk County has developed the Septic Improvement Program.Under the Reclaim Our Water Septic (/Portals/60/Septic%202roeram%20l Improvement Program,homeowners who decide to replace their cesspool or septic system with the new technologies 30-)ZS1Q will be eligible for a grant of up to$11,000—inclusive of installing a pressurized shallow drain field—to offset the cost of one of the new systems.In addition to the grant,homeowners can qualify to finance the remaining cost of the Grant Information systems over 15 years at a low 3%fixed interest rate.The loan program will be administered by Community Development Corporation of Long Island Funding Corp,with financial support from Bridgehampton National Bank, lap of Priority Areas in the amount$1 million and,financial commitments from several philanthropic foundations. (/Portals/60/docs/RECLAIM Priorit *Note:The average total cost for approved systems,including attendant engineering and design services,is Understanding the Grant Process approximately$19,200.Costs will vary on a case-by-case basis.Please review our documents detailing the estimated (/Portals/60/docs/HomeownerProce engineering costs VPortals/60/docs/Desig=r%20RankingZ2ODocument 7 14 2018.pdf) estimated vendor costs 30-17,pdf) (/Portals/60/docs/Vendor%20Rankin�/20Document%20rev%208-8-2018.pdfl.and costs associated with owning an I/A OWTS(/Portals/60/docs/WhatHomeownersshouldknow 6-30-17.p 1f. Video(/Homeowners asux) Frcpently Asked Questions _)rant Eligibility Criteria: (/Homeowners.aspx#faal In order for an application to be considered for a grant the following preliminary criteria must be met: Cost Information ■ The residence must be single family,owner-occupied year round and a property owner's primary residence. r .y How a Conventional - Ground Absorpflon ,Septi* c Tan vatem- - Treats ous _ Wastewater Robert L. Uebler, Ph . D . Soil Scientist - - w`�t,t � � � '•`� " `',$add r 1 World Health Organization o Reported in August of 2002 o "3 .4 million people, mostly children , die o annually from water related diseases" o The most prominent reason for these o .deaths is that "2 .4 billion people have o inadequate sewage disposal facilities" o Protection of public health is a primary o goal of your job. a„ Plumbing Code > Requires water using fixtures to dispose P of waste generated in every house ® This water carried waste must in turn be o treated by either an on -site ®r central o disposal, system if Public Health is to be > protected . P At Conventional Septic Tank System o Combined wastewater stream from the house is -first discharged to a septic tank thru a single pipe at the inlet of the tank. Hou ste hold Wastewater 1 .)Water - 98% 2 .)Suspended Solids 3 .)Oil and Grease 4.)Nitrogen 5 .)Phosphorus 6 .)Virus and Disease Organisms 7.)Fecal Coliform e. Concentration in Wastewater Suspended solids(mg / I) - 250 Oil and Grease(mg / 1) - 60 Total Nitrogen(mg / I) - 70 Total Phosphorus(mg / I) - 24 Fecal Coliform / 100 ml - 10E6 Virus and Disease - present x� AP Strength of Waste - Biochemical Oxygen Demand ( BOD) Def.-The amount of oxygen used during the decomposition of organic material contained in the wastewater. Household Wastewater - 250 mg / I Treatment by the Septic Tank Primary Treatment -Settling -Anaerobic Digestion Required Detention Time - 2days 4' Concentration of TankEffluent House Tank Suspended solids (mg / 1) 250 100 Oil and grease (mg / 1) 60 20 , Total Nitrogen (mg / 1) 70 40 Total Phosphorus (mg / 1) 24 12 Fecal Coli (org / 1 00m1) l 0E6 1 0E6 Virus and Disease Pres pres ELS 5 What happens to the effluent after it leaves the septi' c tank? o The sewage enters a distribution devise o The sole function of this device is to spread o the effluent equally to trenches in the soil of o the yard . o The trenches store the sewage until it o infiltrates the soil . o The soil must treat the remaining o concentration of contaminants in the effluent. U x 9 Treatment by foil Suspended Solids 1 .) Filtration 2 .) Digestion by Organism > aerobic > products of digestion - carbon dioxide - water - 3 .j Aerobic soil , allows aerobic organisms to digest' the solids & prevent clogging of the trenches - t>'- . �01 Treatment by Soil Grease and Oil . 1 .) Filtration 2 .) Digestion > aerobic > products - water and CO2 3 .) BOD - Higher for grease and oil than most other O. M . Treatment by Soil Nitrogen 1 .) Most nitrogen converts to ammonia in the tank. 2 .) Positively charged and attracted to negatively charged soil . 3 .) Aerobic nitrifying- -bacteria - NO3 4.) 40 mg / I nitrate dilutes - to < 1 0 mg / I 5 .) 40 mg / I nitrate must be diluted to < 10 mg / I , if it is to be - safe for reuse f s ,- Treatment by Soil Phosphorus 1 .) Chemically bonds to soil . 2 .) Concentration increases 3 .) Precipitates as combines with- Al , Fe, Ca 4.) Insoluble 5 .) Fixation Treatment by Soil Fecal Coliform Disease Organisms 1 .) Anaerobes . 2 .) Filtered by the soil and attracted to negatively charged sites. 3 .) Cannot compete in aerobic environment 4.) Die off. 5 .) Virus is small travels furthest. 6.) Fecal coliform are indicators of human contamination Conventional Septic Systems Provide Public Health Protection which is : o Simple o Reasonable in cost o Treatment effective o Responsible for treating half of the sewage in our state �j The ' area of soil needed for 9 treatment of the sewage depends on : 0 1 .) The volume of sewage produced in the house 0 2 .) The long -term acceptance rate, LTAR, that the soil maintains for absorption of the sewage. - '­........... e . Volume of Wastewater Many studies have shown the average household occupant generates 60 gallons of wastewater in a day. - we assume 2 people per bedroom - 2 x 60 = 120 gal / bedroom /day - 3 bedrooms x 120 = 360 gal /day * Smallest design flow for any house = 240 gal /days -ov x ` n Required Tre- nch Bottom Area Equals o Design flow in gallons per day o Divided by LTAR in gallons per square foot per day 1 Purpose of site and- soil evaluation - Match the assimilative capacity of the soil to treat wastewater to the amount of water coming from the house so that the septic system does not fail System Failure Surfacing of untreated waste -direct exposure to disease Contamination of Groundwater Contamination of - Surface Water Suffolk County Sanitary Code—Article 6 Page 6-i1 §760-607 Filing Requirements Every Developer that obtains Department approval of a Realty Subdivision or Development, as required by Section 760-604, shall thereafter file a map of such Realty Subdivision or Development, as the case may be, bearing the stamp of approval of the Department, in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk within one(1) year of the date of approval of the Department. §760-608 Sewage Facilities Requirements for Construction Proiects(Single-Family Residences and Conventional Single-Family Residential Subdivisions or Developments) A. A Community Sewerage System method of Sewage disposal is required when any of _ the following conditions are present: 1. the Construction Project or any portion thereof, is located within an existing sewer district.; This requirement shall apply in the absence of proof satisfactory to the Department that the Developer cannot effect arrangements for the installation and/or connection of the sewerage system to the existing sewer district; 2. the Construction Project is located in an area where the subsoil or groundwater conditions are not conducive to the proper fumctioning of Individual Sewerage Systems; 3. the Construction Project is located outside of Groundwater Management Zones III, V and VI, and the Construction Project parcels are less than 20,000 square feet in area, unless the Realty Subdivision or Development meets the Population Density Equivalent requirements of paragraph B.l.a. of this Section. This condition does not apply to a Construction Project that has an exemption pursuant to Section 760- 612 of this Article; or 4. the Construction Project is located within Groundwater Management Zones III, V or VI, and the Construction Project is less than 40,000 square feet in area, unless the Realty Subdivision or Development meets the Population Density Equivalent requirements of paragraph B_2.a. of this Section. This condition does not apply to a Construction Project that has an exemption pursuant to Section 760-612 of this Article. -X,B. Individual Sewerage Systems may be approved by the Department as to the method of Sewage disposal provided the following conditions are met: 1. For Construction Projects located outside of Groundwater Management Zones III, V,and VI; v Suffolk County Sanitary Code—Article 6 Page 6-12 a. the Construction Project consists of parcels which have an area of at least 20,000 square feet; or the Realty Subdivision or Development has a Population Density Equivalent equal to or less than that of a Realty Subdivision or Development of Single-Family Residences in which all parcels consist of an area of at least 20,000 square feet; or the Construction Project has'an exemption pursuant to Section 760-612 of this Article;and b. the Construction Project, or any portion thereof, is not located within an existing sewer district and is' located in an area where subsoil and ' groundwater conditions are conducive to the proper functioning of Individual Sewerage Systems; and c. Individual Sewerage Systems comply with the Department's current standards and the minimum State requirements as set forth in 10 New York Code of Rules and Regulations (" NYCRR"), Part 75, to the extent applicable to Suffolk County; and d. the requirements of Section 760-609 hereof are complied with. 2. For Construction Projects located within Groundwater Management Zones III, V, or VI; a. the Construction Project consists of parcels which have an area of at least 40,000 square feet; or the Realty Subdivision or Development has a Population Density Equivalent equal to or less than that of a Realty Subdivision or Development of Single-Family Residences in which all parcels consist of an area of at least 40,000 square feet; or the Construction Project has an exemption pursuant to Section 760-612 of this Article; and b. the Construction Project, or any portion thereof, is not located within an existing sewer district and is located in an area where subsoil and groundwater conditions are conducive to the proper functioning of Individual Sewerage Systems; and c. the Individual Sewerage Systems comply with the Department's current standards and the minimum State requirements as set forth in 10 NYCRR, Part 75,to the extent applicable to Suffolk County;and d. the requirements of Section 760-609 hereof are complied with. 3. Realty Subdivisions or Developments may have parcels of less than 20,000 square feet in areas within Groundwater Management Zones I, II, IV, VII or VIII with the use of Transfer of Development Rights in conformance with standards established by the Department. Y t COUNTY OF SUFFOLK e STEVEN BELLONE SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS AND CONSTRUCTION FOR SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS FOR OTHER THAN SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES December 29, 2017 James L. Tomarken,MD, MPH, MBA, MSW Commissioner of Health Services Walter Dawydiak, PE, JD Director of Environmental Quality u , Suffolk County Department of Health Services 12/29/17 ,Structure`Use Density Load Kitchen/Gray Load I3"draulic Load' MUNICIPAL SERVICES Library,firehouse, 0.03 gpd/sf+5 0.03 gpd/sf+5 precinct,museum,art gpd/occupant'for 2.5 gpd/occupant' gpd/occupant'+2.5 a lle hn rooms meeting rooms gpd/occupant' Library,firehouse, precinct,museum,art 0.03 gpd/sf 2.5 gpd/occupant' 0.03 gpd/sf+2.5 gallery gpd/occupant w/o meeting rooms OFFICE Nos ace n-medical office 0.06 gpd/sf 0.06 gpd/sf RECREATION Bath house/comfort i 5 gpd/occupant'+5 1 5 gpd/shower/occupant + station 5 gpd/occupant Food service? gpd/shower/occupant+ Food service Bowling alley/tennis 100 gpd/court or alley Food service? 100 gpd/court or alley+ court/racquetball Food service Miniature golf 15 gpd/parking space Food service 15 d servic ?gpd/parking space+ Food service 15 gpd/skater'+5 7 15 gpd/skater'+5 Ice/roller Skating Rink gpd/spectator' Food service gpd/spectator +Food service Recreation 15 gpd/parking space Food service 15 d servicgpd/parke space+ Food service Spa/Fitness Center/ Karate/Dance/etc. 0.1 gpd/sf 0.2 gpd/sf+Food service' servicece?0.3 +Food (w/showers&amenities) ser Spa/Fitness Center/ Karate/Dance/etc. 0.1 gpd/sf Food service 0.1 / +Food w/o showers&amenities) Servicece Marina 10 gpd/boat slip Food service 10 gpd/boat slip+Food service OTB 5 gpd/person Food service 5 gpd/person+Food service Theater 3 gpd/seat Food service 3 gpd/seat+Food service Horse Farm6 0.04 gpd/sf+10 0.04 gpd/sf+10 gpd/stallgpd/stall Camp Ground 10 gpd/camper 5 gpd/shower/camper 10 gpd/camper+5 gpd/shower/camper Billiard Hall 5 d/occ 2.5 d/occ 1 7.5 d/occ RESIDENTIAL Single Family 300 gpd 300 gpd Residence Two Family Residence 600 gpd 600 gpd 17 SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK SUFFM COON— v.laRy>.••ie..x«.d xwemwr rr rT PAMryr-UntwwW MYEmIW'^ �•+¢I,Ir+I y_J � ^'�G .•M' G!�s 1do,J sw.r 0.]yW W.Ibry[aWbul6pNwm5urlK.W.eA 1 2.25ym IuAe.wWWwanVwYn W wPunn_a wn �P ��r..w..•wrr.ww.rr Am - — SHELTER � ISLAND i;.mxn I SOUTHOID 1 HUNTINGTON 'SMRHTOWN i � w r NASSAU RIVERHEAD •.-.. COUNTY — _ BROOKHAVEN _ 1 ISLIP _ - v� EAST HAMPTON g tr RAfiYION 1 • SOUTHAMPTON V � m 4 11"o » POSSIBLE AREAS FOR ADVANCED �.•�;. � .»—r' ' s.r WASTEWATER TREATMENT 1 V' in eanr«cvs Surface Waters Contributing Areas tv 0 3 6 9 ]7 * \�^ z � . . � � . \ ! � \ SCDHS.20161 A OWTS Report December 2017 'F 1. Executive Summary The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) has prepared this annual report in accordance with the requirements of Article 19 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (Article 19). The report summarizes the performance of innovative and alternative onsite wastewater treatment systems (I/A OWTS) installed in Suffolk County as well as neighboring jurisdictions and examines emerging technologies that could potentially become available for use in Suffolk County. This report also provides recommendations for future research, development and modifications to Suffolk County's performance standard provided technology treatment capabilities warrant such adjustments. This report was prepared in 2017 using the complete dataset from 2016. This report will serve as a template for the 2017 annual report,which will be prepared in the spring of 2018. Performance Standard for Total Nitrogen Suffolk County currently requires I/A OWTS to be capable of reducing effluent total nitrogen (TN)to 19 milligrams per liter (mg/I) or less as outlined in the SCDHS "Standards Promulgated Under Article 19 for the Approval and Management of Innovative and Alternative Onsite Wastewater -- Treatment Systems" (Article 19 Standards). The established treatment requirement mimics the performance requirements of Rhode Island and Massachusetts. The--treatment level-of 19 mg/I ;represents a reduction in TN-through the-VA OWTS of approximately 50%to 70%depending on the incoming nitrogen concentration,-which may vary_from site to site depending on water,usage and other-factors. Other States permit higher effluent TN such as the State of Maryland, which requires I/A'OWTS to meet 30 mg/1 or less. The New Jersey Pinelands Commission regulates nitrogen reduction in terms of density. Systems that treat to 14 mg/I TN based on their standard may be used for development of lots of at least 1 acre in size. It should be noted that the Suffolk County Sanitary Code Article 6 (Article 6) limits the amount of sewage that can be discharged on a parcel of land based on lot area when using an onsite sewage disposal system such as a conventional system (septic tank plus leaching structure) or an I/A OWTS. I/A OWTS are only permitted to be used when a site meets the density requirements of Article 6. Using an I/A OWTS coupled with the density requirements of Article 6, greater water resource protection can be achieved. I/A OWTS Performance in Suffolk County Suffolk County initiated an I/A OWTS Demonstration Project in 2014. A total of nineteen (19) I/A OWTS units were donated by four (4) manufacturers representing six (6) different I/A OWTS technologies. The purpose of the Demonstration program is to assess the design, operation, maintenance, installation, and overall ability of an I/A OWTS technology to meet nitrogen reduction objectives. Following a County wide lottery for interested homeowners,the demonstration systems were installed between June 24, 2015 and February 29, 2016. The Hydro-Action AN unit and ' ` Page 2 of 26 SCDHS 2016 YA 09-TS Report December 2017 Norweco Singulair TNT unit are currently the only two (2) technologies that received Provisional Approval in 2016 in accordance with Article 19 Standards based.on their performance in the demonstration program. SCDHS performed monthly composite sampling of the demonstration systems to evaluate their nitrogen removal capabilities under real-world conditions. Technologies that maintained an average of 19_mg/I TN or better for 75% of all the systems tested for a minimum of-six (6) months were granted provisional approval. The 2016 results of the demonstration -systems are summarized in Table 1. Table 1:2016 Septic Demo System Performance in Suffolk County .O '` AO Hydro-Action AN Series 11.6_mg/L w Approved in September 2016 No rviieco,SingulaitTNT;', t"18:3'mg/L':- Approved in Octo6err2U16 Y _ Orenco AX-RT Series 18.5,mg/L• -."Approved in March 2017 Narviieco Hydro=Kinetic _ 17:5,mg/L} ' - '''Appro`ved°iri Agril s=, Orenco AX Series - 21.6 mg/L ' tannot'project approval at this time - _ p'Busse MMF_ `72:3 mg%L,y 'Cannot proj. approval.at-this time. ' "Standard is 19mg/L I/A OWTS Performance in Proximate Jurisdictions Prior to developing an I/A OWTS management program, Suffolk County embarked on a four (4) state tour to evaluate I/A OWTS programs in neighboring jurisdictions . This tour included visits to the New Jersey Pinelands Commission, Maryland Department of Environment, Rhode Island's New England Onsite Wastewater Training Program, and Massachusetts Barnstable County Department of Health and Environment. Lessons learned from these jurisdictions were instrumental in guiding the County in the development of a robust I/A OWTS management program and as such,-the County has continued to consult with these jurisdictions throughout the Demonstration Program and I/A OWTS program development. Table 2 and Table 3 depict the 1/A OWTS technologies approved for use in these jurisdictions along with performance data for 2016 compared to the tested nitrogen effluent during their NSF 245 or EPA ETV certification process. Figure 1 depicts a graph of the effluent TN of these systems in 2016. Page 3 of 26 - COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVEN-BELLONE 1 SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES JAMES L TOMARKEN,MD,MPH,MBA,MSW Commissioner DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES LIST OF APPROVED INNOVATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS(1/A OWTS) Revised January 19,2018 All I/A OWTS technologies must be approved by the Department for use in Suffolk County as either an Experimental,Piloting,Demonstration,Provisional,or General Use system in order to be permitted for installation as a sewage disposal system in accordance with the"Standards for Approval of Plans and Construction for Sewage Disposal Systems for Single-Family Residences"and Standards for Approval of Plans and Construction for Sewage Disposal Systems for Other Than Single Family Residences".This'list hereby specifies such approved I/A OVM technologies in Suffolk County. EXPERIMENTAL APPROVALS: The following systems are approved for Experimental Use in Suffolk County, meaning that three (3) to five (5) systems of each technology may be installed on year round properties. These systems will be sampled monthly for twelve(12) months and approval for Piloting will be granted if the total dataset of .75%of the experimental systems have a combined average of 19 mg/L or less TN. 'Technology contact.-= s, j _ . ` #,ofi:_ Max#: .Approval Name,' .- ;_: ` - , Information -. .Systems_. of _ - Date _ - _ - Approve Systems' Allowed - Orenco Advantex+Nitrex System Pio Lombardo 0 5 7/20/17 Lombardo Associates (617)9642924 pio@lombardoassociates.com Waterloo Biofilter + Nitrex System Pio Lombardo Lombardo Associates 0 5 7/20/17 (617)964-2924 pio@lombardoassociates.com BioMicrobics SeptTech+Nitrex Pio Lombardo 0 5 7/20/17 System Lombardo Associates DMSION'OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY—Office of Ecology 360 Yaphank Avenue,Suite 2B,Yaphank,NY 11980(631)852-5800 PubliCHe®tlth F. P (617)964-2924 pio@lombardoassociates.com Nitrogen Reducing Biofilter-Lined HilaryWolfskill 2 5 7/15/16 Center for Clean Water Technology Stony Brook University Hilary.Wolfskill@stonvbrook.edu Phone:(631)216-7417 Nitrogen Reducing Biofilter-Unlined Hilary Wolfskill 1 5 7/15/16 Center for Clean Water Technology Stony Brook University Hilary.Wolfskill@stonybrock.edu Phone:(631)216-7417 Nitrogen Reducing Biofilter—Denite Hilary Wolfskill- _ 0 5 7/15/16 Tank Center for Clean Water Technology Stony Brook University Hila ry.Wolfskill @stonvbrook.edu Phone:(631)216-7417 PILOTING APPROVALS: The following systems are approved for Piloting in Suffolk County, meaning that eight(8)to twelve(12) systems of each technology may be installed on year round properties. These systems will be sampled monthly for twelve (12) months and approved for Provisional Use if if the"total dataset of 75%of the systems have a combined average of 19 mg/L or less TN. :Technology ' - - "Contact. - _- #of= -Max.#of - __Approval Name" 4 _ �Infoena_tio_ n Systems;'_ 5ys#emsx _ =Date" -A W,-';roved` Allowed; ECOPOD-N Series Mike Catanzaro 0 12 7/20/2017 Delta Environmental,Inc. P.O.Box 969 Denham Springs,LA 70727 http://www.deltaen%Aronmental.com/ 1-800-219-9183 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALrrY—Office of Ecology PdeaieHealHL 360 Yaphank Avenue,Suite 2B,Yaphank,NY 11980(631)852-5800 ttaect.Aoeate.Ptotcct. " 4 PROVISIONAL USE APPROVALS: The following systems are approved for Provisional Use in Suffolk County, meaning that there is no cap on the amount of systems that may be installed. However, the first twenty (20) year-round systems must be sampled by every other month for twenty four (24) months and all other residential systems must be sampled every 12 months. Provisionally approved technologies may'receive general use approval if the dataset of all-of the 20 year round systems have a combined average of 19 mg/I or less TN. Technology;Name; _ - Contact _. - - PSD =__:Approyal_'Date - - Information.: Joe Densieski,Wastewater Works,Inc. wastewaterworksinc@smail.com (631)831-2580 Hydro-Action AN Series 2 September 28,2016 Thomas Foster,Eco Supply Co.- Calverton,NY 631-599-2457 sales@ecosupplvcomapanvinc.com Tom Montalbine,-President Roman Stone Construction Company NorwecoSingulair'TNT Bayshore,,N.Y www.romanstoneco.com N/A: - October 7,2016 631-667-0566 Ext.114, ; tmontalbine @romanstoneco.com Lee Essay,Nugent&Potter Orenco AX-RT Southampton,NY www_nugentaotter.com 1 March 1,2017 631-283-1103-LeegnuKentpotter.com } Tom Montalbine,-President Roman Stone Construction Company Norweco Hydro-Kinetic Bayshore,NY. 1 April 21,2017 www.romanstoneco.com- _ 631-667-0566 Ext:114 tmontalbiiie@romanstoneco.com' Bryan McGowin bryan@awsli.com Advanced Wastewater Solutions,LLC Southampton,NY-631-405-0358 Fuji Clean CEN 1 January 19,2018 Peder Larsen Shelter Island Sand&Gravel PO Box 2028—Shelter Island,NY (631)749-1040 *Note:PSD Category type determines loading rates allowed when sizing Pressurized Shallow Drainfields(PSWs)following pretreatment. Category 1 systems have been classified by The Department as meeting effluent standards less than or equal to 20 mg/L for both BOD and TSS and 5 mg/L for FOG. This classification is based on the average of the steady state data on file for a technology. This data will be updated every 6-months with provisional sample results from manufacturers and systems will be reclassified as the data warrants. A PSD Category of N/A indicates that the system does not meet the requirements for category 1 or 2 at this time. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL 4QUAU7Y—Office of Ecology P UL 360 Yaphank Avenue,Su"de 2B,Yaphank,NY 11980(631)852-5800 r Ilome(httpJ/suffolkcountynygov/row/Home.aspx) Reclaim Our%%iIter HomeownersJ/suffolkco ov/row/Homeowners.aspx) (hamg Septic Improvement Program (httpJ/suffolkcountynygov/row/Septicimp-v--tProgtam-px) Industry(http://suffolkcountynygnv/row/Industry asp.) Regulatory(httpJ/suffolkcountlmy-gov/row/Regulatory-aspx) Technical(httpJ/suffolkcountyny gov/mw/TechnicaLaspx) htfnstructure(httpJ/suffolkmuntynygov/row/Infiastructureaspx) Contact(http./suff)lkcountynygov/row/Coiitactaspx) Techn' ical Innovative and Alternative Onsite Wastewater System Demonstration Program—Phase 1 and 2 Technologies T see the Innovative Advanced Vendor Summaries.click hem(/Portals/60/docs/SendcDemoTechnologySLYgmewudf) ,Manufacturer Technology Product Description ;enco Systems Ad t nTex X RT Q Rp-/!v_,R.,orenco com/intll/eng)ish/residential cf n) Orenco's AdvanTex AX RT is a completely Pre-packaged "plug&play"AX20 wastewater treatment system.All interior components are assembled and adjusted at the factory,so customers save on installation costa There are fewer working parts,so customers save on equipment costs.And the RT can be shallowly buried,so customers save on excavation costs Orenco Systems AdvanTex®AX Series Orencos AdvanTexAX20 Treatment Systems provide Inc (http-//wwworenmcom&3Mtemsladvmtex wastewater treatmentcW environmentally sustainable treatment of residential wastewater flows.They are the ideal solution for difficult soils, small sites,system upgrades and repairs,new installations, pretreatment;nitrogen reduction,and disinfection. Norweco Systems Sineulair®Model TNT®Total Nit w Treatment System Certified performance data from NSF International verifies n.m,s•nwww norweco coin4aW/products/TNThtm) that the average effluent produced by the Singulair Model TNT system contains 7 mg/L Nitrate,12 mg1L Total Nitrogen, 4 mg/L CBOD5 and 9 mg(L Total Suspended Solids.The Singulair Model TNT reduces Total Nitrogen by more than 68%.Featuring flow equalization,effluent filtration and the lowest electrical usage in the industry,this advanced treatment unit biologically oxidizes nitrogen compounds to accomplish nitrification and denitrification.Designed for easy installation, operation and maintenance,the Model TNT system rnin;m;zes effluent nitrogen concentrations reliably and economically.The Singulair Model TNT System delivers state-of-the-art performance without requiring effluent recirculation or the addition of dangerous chemicals.All treatment is efficiently accomplished within the precast concrete Singulair tank. Norweco Systems-F(ydm-Kinetic Wastewater Treatment System The Hydro-Kinetic system uses the extended aeration and fhM=//we^v nonmco com/html/products/bydro-kine it-html f attached growth processes to treat wastewater,and features `innovative nitrification-denitrification technology.Achieved unmatched effluent results of 2.0 mg/L CBOD(Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand),2.0 mg/L TSS(Tbtal Suspended Solids)and 7.9 mg/L TN(Total Nitrogen). BUSSE GREEN Busse MF&M-J/wwwbusse-gtcom/small-sewagtMg ment-plant- The Busse MF Small Size Sewage Treatment System is TECHNOLOGIES how-it-works.asn) designed on the basis of DIN 4261 part 2 and is comprised of two treatment steps,pre-treatment and aeration.Membrane Liters elunmate suspended material,as well as bacteria and v germs,ensuring that only totally dear,odourless,hygienically harmless water(filtrate)leaves the system.The BusseGT system using mic o5luadonmembra•nes an hold back all bacteria and viruses. _Hydro-Action Hydro-Action(hqp//www dro-action eom/aboud The Hydro-Action system outperforms traditional septic tanks y` in prolonging drain field life,meeting environmental requirements,and handling issues like poor soil or high groundwater.Before wastewater enters the ATE,it runs through the pretreatment or septic tank.Pretreating reduces the amount of solids and other materials that can get into the system.The system's flexibility allows the ATU to be added to an existing septic tank or used with the Hydro-Action system alone. PremiexTech Ecoflo Biofilter-Treatment and Polishing Unit The Ecoprocess Coco Filter is an innovative and compact Aqua (ham:&mgff rniectecbaqua.comh am-mter-sewer-treatment-_ wastewaterincorporatinga100%natural,organic filtering nlants/biofilter-disinfection-per media made of coco husk fragments and a low-pressure distribution system that consumes very little energy. Preassembled and easy to install,Ecoprocess Coco Filter is shipped to sites ready-to-use in robust fiberglass shells. F R Mahony& Air phidromeO(http://www.amphidrome.com/ampbidromel Utilizing,Biologically Active Filter(BAF)high biomass Associates Inc technology,the Amphidrome®system provides simultaneous removal of BOD,ammonia,suspended solids and nitrate- nitrogen in an extremely small footprint. Waterloo Biofilter Waterloo BioE ter(bStp:/(waterloo-biofiltercom/nroducts/residential/) The core of the Waterloo Biofilter system is its synthetic, absorbent filter medium that is configured as a free-draining, attached growth,biological trickling filter to treat sewage, process wastewaters,landfill leachate,and polish sewage lagoon discharge Adelante systems(baR://www.adelanteconsultin%mmL?pagC id=41053 The Pugo System is an environmentally safe alternative to Consulting Inc traditional residential septic systems.Pugo is a self-contained unit that is both compact and lightweight.With a Pugo septic system,you can recycle and reclaim 100%of your household wastewater.And since Pugo's drainfieId is up to 20-30% smaller than a typical septic leach field,it is also an ideal septic a solution for waterfront homes. Microbics Inc MoBarrier&Membrane Bioreactor The BioBartier@ MBR was the first system certified for water jhhgW://wwwbiomicmbics.com/prroduct5/bio-barrier-membrane- reuse(NSF/ANSI Std 350,class R)for total blackwater and bioreactor/) greywater reeyding This simple,low-cost,and robust MBR system uses advanced technology to offer the highest quality effluent possible on the market.The pre-engineered,modular MBR ships installation-ready and fits easily into both new and existing tank configurations The membranes and processes used in this advanced system act as an impenetrable physical barrier for nearly all common pollutants found in wastewater today.BioBarriers low foul,durable,flat-sheet membrancs utilize micro-sized pores for physical separation of solids from the wastewater.The system's unique operation sequence requires no complicated backwash functionality and is completely automated using an advanced control strategy. BioMicrobics Inc ScptMxh(hitrr//wwws=titech cpm/about-us/stag-residential/) The SeptiTech STARK biological trickling filter systems are designed to treat wastewater with minimal operator oversight while delivering consistently high quality treatment even during peak flows,low flows or intermittent flows BioMicrobics Inc Micm-FAST®(http-//wwwbiomicrobics corn/products/fast-mmtewater- MicroFAST19 wastewater treatment systems are designed for treatment-Mtems/microfasth residential strength wastewater in eight specific sizes based on daily wastewaterusage. Fuji Systems EWi Clean CEN Series(httn://wwwfvjicleanusa com/residential- The CE5 is Fuji Clean USA's most compact system,which can treatment treatment�terxWcen-seriesseries comfortably treat up to 4 bedrooms of straight wastewater.No preceding septic tank is necessary and not required(unless dictated by state or local regulations).A very small footprint (71"x 3'3")and weight of just under 400 pounds makes this system highly maneuverable and adaptable to the very tightest and most difficult-to-access sites Designed to accommodate variable flows and shock loadings,this low power draw(54w) low maintenance compact system is a natural choice for a single family home. (httpJ/suffolkcountyny gov/row/login.aspx? ReturnUrl-%2frow%2ftechniadasphd a }� urt ti�k Overview of Provisionally Approved Technologies What is Provisional Approval? The Department of Health Services promulgated standards under Article 19 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code that outlines the Approval Process of I/A OWTS Technologies. Systems provisionally approved in Suffolk County have a proven track record in other Eastern States such as New Jersey, Massachusetts, J Rhode Island and Maryland. In addition,these systems have been rigorously tested in Suffolk County to ensure that they function as advertised. Suffolk County is one of the few jurisdictions that requires long term monitoring of the systems to ensure that homeowners are getting the best performance out of their water quality investment. How do the Provisionally Approved Technologies Reduce Nitrogen? Currently, all of the four Provisionally Approved Technologies in Suffolk County rely on biological processes to treat wastewater and convert and remove nitrogen.These systems use various methods to provide aerobic bacteria to convert organic nitrogen to nitrite and then use an anaerobic (without oxygen) environment to denitrify by stripping the oxygen molecule off of the nitrate, resulting in the release of gaseous nitrogen into our atmosphere. Common Components on all t/A OWTS: Process tanks(including septic tank if required by the VA manufacturer)with internal piping and valves Sewer piping between the dwelling and process tanks and between the process tanks and leaching structures ` Control Panel with electrical connection and high :. f4`"" water alarms ..: " Conduit piping for electric wiring and junction boxes � f- for electrical connections E _ = Active treatment component such as pumps, blowers,media or effluent filters. Al • Risers/chimneys with covers to grade on all access i. '. openings • Air vents with associated piping and carbon filter as Standard 1/A OWTS required Control Panel Norweco Singulair TNT—Approved October 2016 The Singulair° wastewater treatment system is a self-contained three- chambered treatment system utilizing primary treatment (settling), mechanical aeration, clarification, and flow equalization to achieve treatment. Wastewater from the building enters the primary settling , chamber through an inlet tee, then enters an aeration chamber. In the aeration chamber, an aspirator at the bottom of a shaft disperses air radially as fine bubbles provide oxygen for the biomass and vertically mix chamber contents. The wastewater in the aeration chamber passes through to the clarification chamber for final settling of solids. Treated wastewater passes through an effluent filter as it exits the system and is then gravity fed to the leachfield. Manufacturer Information: + Scott Hetrick,Sales Manager fJ1 Norweco, Inc. r ?+` 220 Republic Street v '-= Norwalk,OH 44857 .. -k,- •� _Web:www.norweco.com Phone:(419) 668-4471 _ 4 - Email:shetrick@norweco.com Distributor Information: Tom Montalbine,President Roman Stone Construction Company 85 South Fourth Street Norweco Sinaulair Features Bayshore,NY 11706 • Single unit concrete construction Web:www.romanstoneco.com Phone: 631-667-0566 Ext.114 • One mechanical aerator • Three covers to grade • Biokinetic Effluent Filter Email: tmontalbine@romanstoneco.com • Gravity Flow Through Photos of NorwecoSingulair TNT installationsfrom Suffolk County SepticDemonstration • ' - '+ r " ti ( - Hydro-Action AN Series —Approved September 2016 The Hydro-Action® systems utilizes a suspended growth aeration system. The treatment occurs as wastewater enters the pretreatment tank and flows by gravity into the aeration compartment. Wastewater flows by gravity from the aeration chamber through a hole in the base of the cone-shaped clarifier, where final settling takes place. The hydraulic roll created by the aeration system helps draw settled solids out of the base of the clarifier and back into the aeration chamber. The aerobically-charged wastewater is then recirculated back to the pretreatment tank, where it further denitrifies. Treated wastewater exits by gravity through a tee structure located in the center of the clarifier, treated effluent is then discharged to a Department approved leachfield structure. Manufacturer Information: Pete Sabo — �, Hydro-Action Industries AK/HA Manufacturing PO Box 640 t" Plymouth, IN 46563 Phone: (800) 370-3749 Email: Pete@ hydro-action.com Distributor Information: Hydro-Action AN Features Thomas Foster • Single unit fiberglass construction Ecological Supply • One air pump Calverton, NY 11933 • One recirculation pump (sends treated Phone: 631-599-2457 effluent back to the septic tank for Email: additional treatment) sales@cosupplycomapanyinc.com • One mixing pump (used for system start-up only) • Three covers to grade Photos of Hydroaction Systems from Suffolk County Septic Demonstration Program /�_�y moi_^ { '.�_'>ii+ -�• q..��.:f•''F: ' ,.� Cyt a - ,4 Norweco HydroKinetic —April 2017 The HydroKinetic utilizes suspended growth aeration. Pretreatment tank effluent mixes with nitrified recirculated liquid in the anoxic chamber via a mixing bar. The mixed liquor gravity flows in the aeration chamber where flow equalization maximizes biological oxidation and assures proper retention and treatment. The clarification chamber allows for settling and recirculation of nitrified liquid back to the anoxic chamber. Treated water passes through a flow equalization device to the FEU filter where it travels through the proprietary attached growth filtration media and is discharged to an approved leaching structure. Manufacturer Information: Scott Hetrick, Sales Manager Norweco, Inc. «�°' „ "" �"'• 220 Republic Street Norwalk, OH 44857 mr p Web: www.norweco.com Phone:(419) 668-4471 Email: shetrick(@norweco.com t Distributor Information: Tom Montalbine,President ^••�^ - �^ - - ^��' Roman Stone Construction Company 85 South Fourth Street Bayshore, NY 11706 Web: www.romanstoneco.com Norweco HydroKinetic Features Phone: 631-667-0566 Ext.114 • Precast concrete construction • Treatment unit is preceded by a w separate primary tank Email: tmontalbine@romanstoneco.com • One air pump • One recirculation pump r Six covers to grade Photos of Norweco Hydrokinetic installations from the Suffolk County Septic Demonstration Program ME rw - - _ r Orenco Advantex AX20-RT—Approved March 2017 The AdvanTex® AX-RT Series is a recirculating textile filter treatment system. It is contained with a single fiberglass tank installed with the access panel at grade. It is preceded by a two-compartment septic tank and discharges to a leachfield. Raw sewage enters the septic tank through its inlet tee. In the septic tank, the raw sewage separates into three distinct zones—a scum layer, a sludge layer, and a clear layer. Effluent from the clear layer passes through a Biotube® effluent filter and is discharged by gravity to the recirculation treatment tank portion of the AX-RT unit, which contains a Biotube Pump Package. The recirculation pump is timer controlled to ensure that small, intermittent doses (micro-doses) of effluent are applied to the textile sheets throughout the day. This ensures an aerobic, unsaturated environment for optimal treatment to occur. Effluent is sprayed over the textile sheets. The effluent then percolates down through the textile sheets and is distributed between the recirculation and discharge chambers by means of the AX-RT baffle. Periodically, a pump in the discharge chamber doses effluent to the dispersal system. The system has five main functional parts: 1.Septic tank 2 Biotube'effluent filter I Tex We sheets 4.Recin:ulating section of tank(with Biotutre pump vaulti S.Utsxhaige section of tank(with dyschaige pump in flow inducci i I 100000 gai.Pnmary Tank-Side View WO 98-MM).RT-Sim View Orenco Advantex RT Features • Fiberglass construction • Treatment unit is preceded by a separate primary tank • Two pumps utilized for recirculation/media dosing and effluent dosing. • Two covers to grade for primary tank • One large rectangular cover to grade for treatment unit Photos of Orenco Advantex AX20-RT installations from the Suffolk County Septic Demonstration Program _ tt IT 41, .-%: ��'►^�ib J�'f9 k e� r ,•"�' a'`: if,;`-!t; �` ice- - } r � n Fuji Clean CEN Series—Approved January 2018 -Al tl► � ,, 'f\� lbwa,C 9y BeaFMmta famM CAJTT.[. NJI Fuii Clean CEN Series Features Single unit polyethylene construction One air blower • Three covers to grade • Gravity flow through The Fuji Clean system treats wastewater through a process of contact filtration, flow equalization and recirculation, all within one tank consisting of three sequential chambers, "Sedimentation," "Anaerobic" and "Aerobic." Influent first enters the Sedimentation Chamber, where sludge settles to the bottom, scum and grease float to the top and the relatively clear liquid in the middle flows through a - baffle into the bottom of the 2nd chamber. In this chamber, plastic media provides for upflow filtration as well as surface area on which microbes can grow Filtered flow from the upper portion of the Anaerobic Chamber then flows into the oxygen rich Aerobic Chamber where two different types plastic media provide surface area for aerobic microbe digestion activity, solids filtration and additional nitrification. Oxygen is introduced into the sides of this chamber from one linear diaphragm blower. Air from this same blower is also used to power a recirculation loop 24/7, in a controlled manner, back to the sedimentation chamber. Finally, air from this same blower powers an effluent airlift line that meters cleaned effluent to a Leaching Structure Local Distributer Information: Bryan McGowin Peder Larsen Advanced Wastewater Solutions, LLC Shelter Island Sand, Gravel & Contracting PO Box 1622 PO Box 2028 Southampton, NY 11969 Shelter Island, NY 11964 Phone: (631) 405-0358 Phone: (631) 749-1040 Email: bmcgowin@gmail.com Email: sisandgravel@gmail.com Photos of Fuji Clean CEN Series installations from the Suffolk County Septic Demonstration Program kk V now i For More Information visit www.ReclaimOurWater.info `4+,so�w4r4� -'. or call (631) 852-5811 RO Produced with funding from New York State Department of Environmental Conservation under the Septic Cesspool Upgrade '►�` Program Enterprise(SCUPE)Grant Rel:Ii11111 (Wr Watt:r t Reda � m t ur- Vsk/ate SEPTIC IMPROVEMENT POA What I/A OWTS,Homeowners Should Know Covers to Grade: Covers provide access to your septic system so that your service provider can inspect and maintain your septic system. Covers can be landscaped around but must remain fully accessible. Control Panels: Control Panels are the brains of the I/A OWTS and usually mounted to the side of the dwelling. They should be protected from damage and easily accessible by operation and maintenance providers. Annual Operation & Maintenance: The first three years are covered as part of the manufacturer's warranty. However, homeowners will need to sign yearly maintenance contracts and will be responsible for maintenance costs after the 3 year warranty expires. It is anticipated that O&M will cost approximately$300 a year. Increased Annual Electrical Costs: Depending on the treatment process and manufacturer's system, the system either runs continuously or on-demand. Based on information provided by manufacturers, the systems that are provisionally approved have approximate annual electric costs ranging from $57 to$266 per year. Repair and Replacement Costs: Homeowners should be aware that although I/A OWTS have a long track record of use in the USA, they do contain components such as pumps, floats, air compressors,and controls that may need to be replaced at some point during the useful life of the system. These component repair and replacement costs could range from$50 to $200. Pumping Costs: Although these systems provide advanced treatment, they will still need to be occasionally pumped by a septage hauler. Depending on use of the system, it is estimated that the average system would need to be pumped out every 3-5 years. This increases the treatment and useful life of any sewage disposal system including I/A OWTS. A typical pump-out is estimated to cost$300-$500. 1 Homeowner Rea stration Property owners are required to register i` their 1/A OWTS with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services at time of Final Approval from the Department. Registration is updated every 3 years and upon property transfer. There is no =a-= cost to register your I/A OWTS, but it is _ =`- -• critical in order for SCDHS to ensure proper function of your I/A OWTS and ��`•, ry-1�? r.r� provide homeowners with essential news or information regarding their I/A OWTS. Visible Components- on I/A OWTS: • Risers/chimneys with covers to grade on all access openings • Control Panel with electrical connection and high water alarms • Air Blowers Air vents with associated piping and carbon filter required For More Information visit www.ReclaimOurWater.com or call (631) 852-5811 Produced with funding from New York State Department of Environmental Conservation under the Septic Cesspool Upgrade Program Enterprise(SCOPE)Grant C)lti'1vutt'1' a Suffolk County Septic Improvement Program o ®esagner Cost Ranking Sheet ® Revo July,, 2018 Reclaim 0Uf'1.v.-icer* For More Information visit www.Reclaim®urWatel:info or call (631) 852-5811 Base Price to Design an I/A Designer in Phone OWTS up to 6 Ascending Order Contact Location Number E-mail Bedrooms 3-Engineering,LLC Bennette Burks Virginia 804)873-5000 Burks@3-Eng.com $2,500 D.B.Bennett Consulting Engineer Drew Bennett,PE East Hampton f631)-907-0023 drew@dbb-pe.com $2,160 KPFF Michael Bowden,P.E NY,NY (212)973-3748 Michael.bowden k ff.com $2,500 FPM Engineering Group,P.0 Ritu A.Mod P.E Ronkonkoma (631)737-6200 r.modv@fpm-srouo.com $2,500 Ha duk Engineering,LLC Stephen Ha duk,PE Port Jeff,Station (631)476-0600 shaydulc@havdukengineering.com $2,500 Lombardo Associates,Inc. Pio Lombardo,PE Sag Harbor 617 964-2924 io Iombardoassociates,com $2,500 Pacifico Engineering PC Ralph Pacifico,PE Bohemia (631)988-0000 engineer@ pacificoengineering.com $2,500 R&M Engineering Matthew Scheiner,PE Huntington (631)271-0576 mscheiner@rmsengineering.com $2,500 ROUX Engineering Nick Palumbo,P.E Islandia 631 232-2600 npalumbo@rouxinc,com $2,500 Studio A/B Architects Glynis Berry,A.I.A.,LEEDAP Riverhead 631)591-2402 glynis@studioabarchitects.com $1',500 ZacharyT.Clanahan Architect PLLC acha T.Clanahan Ham ton Bas 631)379-8435 zac@ztcarchitecture.com $2,500 Condon Engineering John Condon Jr,PE Mattituck (631)298-1986 condon77173@optoniine.net $3,000 D&B Engineers William Merklin,P.E Woodbury (516)364-9890 bmerklin@db-eng.com $3,900 Barrett, Bonacci,&Van Weele, P.0 Joseph Marx, PE Hau ague (631)435-1111 marx bbv c.com $5,000 Note:under this scenario all estimated costs above the red line would fall under the intended SIP funding limits when combined with 1/A OWTS material and installation costs, Costs below the red line would require out of pocket expense from Property Owner, Septic Improvement Program(SIP)Notes • Please see Vendor cost ranking document for I/A OWTS material and installation costs. Base prices provided in the document do not include the cost of a site survey,soil borings,percolation test,or additional design parameters that if ,r needed could increase costs and may be incurred at the homeowners expense. • Actual costs may vary based on site constraints. Homeowners are urged to contact Designers to discuss project specific costs for their Property. Some designers may have geographic limits on their service area. Homeowners are urged to contact Designers to see If they fall within their service area. • Grant funding allocated for I/A 01NTS design services are anticipated not to exceed$2,500. Any additional expenses associated with the design of the I/A OWTS would be the responsibility of the homeowner. l WNSuffolk County NY - Septic Improvement Program � Vendor Cost ,;, IZLC.IElll31 (DUI �•1'`tl(tl' Rankin Sheet — Rev. Jul 1 p2018 , L Vendor Quotes: Scenario 1—4-Bedroom I/A OWTS with Reuse of Existing Leaching Structure Technology Contact •Cost (Sorted by Date Approved) Vendor Hydro-Action AN Series CMM Sitework info@cmmsiteworl<.com 631-286-3650 $15,218.44 Notes: Hydro-Action AN Series Direct Drainage DirectDrainaee@aol.com631-472-0677 $15,233.13 1.all estimated costs Dwarren@clearriver.us not highlighted In red Hydro-Action AN Series Clear River Environmental Eastern Suffolk Office:631-298-7749 $15,650.00 would fall under the Western Suffolk Office:631-467-5447 intended SIP funding aasewerdrain@gmail.com limits when combined Hydro-Action AN Series A&A Sewer and Drain Maintenance Inc. 631-849-1599 $15,983.13 with$2,500 in tmontaibine@romanstoneco.com estimated design Norweco Singulair TNT Roman Stone Construction Co $13,821:00 costs. 631=667-0566 L114 Dwarren@clearriver.us 2.Costs highlighted in Norweco Singulair TNT Clear River Environmental Eastern Suffolk Office:,631-298-7749 $13,650.00 red would require Western Suffolk Office:631-467-5447 homeowner out-of- Norweco Singulair TNT Direct Drainage DirectDrainaee@aol.com ' $15.309.16 pocket expense 631-472-0677 I Orenco Advantex AX20-RT A&A Sewer and Drain Maintenance Inc. aasewerdrain@gmail.com 631-849-1599 $19'303.04 * Shelter Island Sand, tmontalbine@romanstoneco.com' Gravel &Contracting Norweco Hydro-Kinetic Roman Stone Construction Co' $16,629.46 Inc.prices apply only 631-667-0566 Ext,.-114 DirectDrainaee@aol.com to installations on Norweco Hydro-Kinetic' Direct Drainage, 631-472-0677. $18,064.25 Shelter Island. ,. Dwarren @clearriver.us Fuji Clean CEN Series Clear River Environmental Eastern Suffolk Office:631-298=7749 $13,900.00 Western Suffolk Office:631-467-5447 Fuji Clean CEN Series CMM Sitework info@cmmsitework.com $14,050.00 631-286-3650 Fuji Clean CEN Series Shelter Island Sand,Gravel sisandgravei@gmail.com &Contracting Inc.* 631-749-1040 $14,180.00 3 r R,C4- )W Suffolk County NY ® Septic Improvement Program i.eclaii@i ()UrWatel' Vendor Cost ranking Sheet - Scenario 2 Vendor Quotes: Scenario 2-4-Bedroom I/A OWTS with New Gravity Leaching Structure Technology . (Sorted by Date Approved) Vendor Contact Information Cost Hydro-Action AN Series CMM Sitework info@cmmsitework.com 631-286-3650 $17,418.44 Notes: Hydro-Action AN Series Direct Drainage DirectDrainage@aol.com 631-472-0677 $17,433.13 1.all estimated Dwarren!Eclearriver.us costs not Hydro-Action AN Series Clear River Environmental Eastern Suffolk Office:631-298-7749 highlighted In red Western Suffolk Office:631-467-5447 $9.7,975,00 would fall under the A&A Sewer and Drain aasewerdrain@gma1I.com intended SIP Hydro-Action AN Series Maintenance Inc. 631-849-1599 $20,383.13 funding limits when Norweco Singulair TNT Roman • _ combined with tmontalbine romanstoneco.com Stone Construction Co $2,500 in estimated 631-667-0566 Ext.114- $16,510.00 design costs. Dwarren@clearriver.us . Norweco Singu lair TNT Clear River Environmental Eastern Suffolk Office:631-298-7749 2.Costs highlighted Western Suffolk Office' -'631-467-s447 $16,350.00 in red would require Norweco Singulair TNT Direct Drainage DirectDraina0e@aol.com homeowner out-of- 631-472-0677' $17,709.16 pocket expense Orenco Advantex AX20-RT A&A Sewer and Drain aasewerdrain@smail.com Maintenance Inc. 631-849-1599 $22,203,04 * Shelter Island Norweco Hydro-Kinetic Roman Stone Construction Co tmontal6i�e@�omahsioneco.com 631-667-0566 Ext.114 $19,328.46 Sand,Gravel & Contracting Inc. c l e@ao. om Nor�aec®&�lydro-kinetic Direct Drainage, � - DirectDraitiage@aol.com � - ' • prices apply only to • 631-472-0677 $20,264.25 installations on o' Fuji Clean CEN Series CMM Sitework info(a@cmmsitework.com Shelter Island. 631-286-3650 $15,950.00 Dwarren@clearriver.us Fuji Clean CEN Series Clear River Environmental Eastern Suffolk Office:631-298-7749 Western Suffolk Office:631-467-5447 $15,975.00 Fuji Clean CEN Series Shelter Island Sand, sisandgravei@gmall.com Gravel&Contracting Inc.* 631-749-1040 $16,730.00 J WSuffolk County IVY - Septic Improvement Program lZeclaini 0LU' W�1tel• Vendor Cost Ranking Sheet -- Scenario 3 Notes: Vendor Quotes:Scenario 3—4-Bedroom I/A OWTS with Pressurized Shallow Drainfield 1.all estimated costs Technology not highlighted In red (Sorted by Date Approved)- Vendor Contact- Cost would fall under the Hydro-Action AN Series CNlllll Sitework info@cmmsitework.com $19,618.44 Intended SIP funding 631-286-3650 limits when combined Hydro-Action AN Series Direct Drainage DirectDrainase@aol.com with$2,500 In H y g 631-472-0677 $19=633.13 estimated design costs. Dwarren@clearriver.us 2.Costs highlighted in Hydro-Action AN Series Clear River Environmental Eastern Suffolk Office:631-298-7749 $19,950.00 red would require Western Suffolk Office:631-467-5447 homeowner out-of- Hydro-Action AN Series A&A Sewer and®rain Maintenance Inc. 631-849-1599 aasewerdrain@smail.com $20,383.13 pocket expense com Orenco Advantex AX20-RT A&A Sewer and Drain Maintenance Inc. aasewerdrain@smail. $22,284.37 3.PSD's can be a cost 631-849-1599 DirectDrainase@aol.com effective option where Norweco Hydro-Kinetic Direct Drainage $22,464.25 site conditions would 631-472-0677 otherwise trigger a tmontalbine@romanstoneco.com mounded retaining wall Norweco Hydro-Kinetic Roman Stone Construction Co 631-667-0566 Ext,114 $19,905.46 system or deep excavations which have Fuji Clean CEN Series Cf1016i11 Satework info@cmmsiteworl(.com = quoted costs greater 9 $19, 03,60 than$40,000.00. '631-286-3650 Dwarren@clearriver.us' ►► Fuji Clean.CEN-Series Clear River,Environmental - Eastern Suffolk Office-,631-298-7749 $190750_ .00 Shelter Island Sand, Western Suffolk Office:631-467-5447 Gravel &Contracting Shelter Island.Sand,Gravel sisandsravel@emaii.com Inc. rices a y Fuji Clean CEN Series $20,183.00 P apply only to -&Contracting Inca 631-749-1040 - installations on Shelter Island. � c V Septic Improvement Program ® Manufacturer Contact Information Reclait'i For More Information visit www.ReclaimOurWater.info or call (631) 852-5811 Manufacturer& Local Contact- Projected 1-Year Electrical Costs Technology-' 1 year electrical Increased electrical Tom Montalbine,President consumption costs per,year Norweco Roman Stone Construction Company Technology —(kWh/year). ($0.17/kWh! Singulair 85 South Fourth Street-Bayshore,NY 11706 Orenco Advantex AX20-RT 335.8 kWh $57.00 & ' Web:www.romanstoneco.com Phone: 631- Fuji Clean System 463.55 kWh $78.80 Hydro -Kinetic 667-0566 Ext.114 Hydro-Action AN 734.26 kWh $124.82 Email:tmontalbine romanstoneco.com Norweco Singulair TNT 979.661cWh $167.00 Norweco Hydro-Kinetic 1051.21cWh $178.70 Joe Densieski Note;the Hydro-Action unit utilizes a mixer pump during start-up.The pump use!s discontinued Hydro-Action Wastewater works inc. after startup,and usage data will vary after the start-up period. 139 Reeves ave Riverhead,NY 11901 Septic Improvement Program Notes www.wastewaterworksinc.com • Please see Designer cost ranking document for estimates of I/A OWTS (631)831-2580 design and permitting costs. • All prices are estimates from Vendor submitted quotes for 4-bedroom I/A Bryan McGowin,Advanced Wastewater Solutions,LLC OWTS.Sales tax is not Included and may be exempt for capital PO BOX 1622-Southampton,NY 11969 improvement projects. Fuji Clean Email:bmcgowin@gmaii.com or brvanC2awsli.com • Actual costs may vary based on site constraints.Homeowners are urged to System 631-405-0358 contact Vendors to discuss project specific costs for their Property. • Grant funding will not exceed$10,000 for I/A OWTS installed with gravity Peder Larsen,Shelter Island Sand,Gravel,&Contracting leaching or$11,000 for I/A OWTS installed with PSD. PO Box 2028—Shelter Island,NY 11964 (631)749-1040 Use of Grant Funds is Not Allowed For: • Irrigation repairs sisandgravel@gmail.com landscaping h � • electrical improvements unrelated to the I/A OWTS Lee Essay,Nugent&Potter 1557 County Rd.39—Southampton NY 11968 orencoAX-RT Phone: 631-283-1103 c• For More Information visit Email: Lee(@nusentootter.com RQ)WwwwReclaimOurWatercom Reclaim c�urwatcr or call (631) 852-5811 Septic improvement Program ® Ongoing Costs A m Reclaim ()u1 For More Information visit www,Reclaim®urWaterinfo or call (631) 852-5811 Estimated Repair and Replacement Costs* Operations& Maintenance CostsLife One Year Contract Technoloky Item Cost- Expectancy Technology Cost Norweco Hydro-Action AN $250.00 SingulairTNT Aerator Replacement $500.00 10 years Orenco Advantex AX20-RT $271.66 Control Panel Re lacement** $1,200.00 20 years Fuji Clean Systems $250.00 Blower Replacement(MAC 8013) $320.00 Norweco H dro-Kinetic $300.00 Blower Replacement MAC 10013 $420.00 10 years Norweco Singulair TNT $315.00 Fuji Clean CEN System Blower Rebuild $150.00 Float Replacement $100.00 5-10 years * Consult manufacturer for additional warranties control°Panel Re lacement** $400.00 20 years specific to their systems. All systems in Suffolk County are sold with a three year warranty, but Blower Replacement $400.00 10 years many manufacturers offer additional warranties _ Blower Rebuild $100.00 on pumps and aerators. Hydro-Action AN Series Recirculation Pump Replacement $400.00 10 years ** Complete replacement of control panels is Float Replacement $80.00 5-10 years rare and usually associated with lightning strikes. Control Panel Replacement** $1,200.00 20 years Check with your homeowners insurance to see if these repair costs are covered under your policy. Orenco Recirculation Pump Replacement $800.00 10 years Advantex Float Replacement AX20-RT $80.00 5-10 years Control Panel Replacement** $1,500.00 20 years Blower Replacement $300.00 10 ears Norweco y For More Information visit Hydro-Kinetic Blower Rebuild $100.00 RQTJ W www.ReclaimOurWater.com Recirculation Pump Replacement $500.00 10 years Reclaim tour heater or call (631)852-5811 Control Panel Replacement** $1,200.00 20 years COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVEN BELLONE SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES JAMES L.TOMARKEN,MD,MPH,MBA,MSW Commissioner March 29,2017 Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company PO Box 86 Orient,NY 1 1957 Atm: Carol Tuthill Re: Tuthill Oysteronds H.C.-Test Wells Private S# Lot/Location HDRef# Tax Map# Sample Request It: Date PR16-0372* S-134481T North Brown Lot#5 S10-16-0003 1000-18-3-30.3 11/30/16 PR 16-0373 S-134480T North Brown Lot#1 SIO-16-0003 1000-18-3-30.3 11/30/16 PR 16-0374* S-134483T South Brown Lot# 1 S10-16-0004 1000-18-6-17.3 12/1/16 1000-18-6-18 1 PR16-0375 * S-134482T North Dyer Lot SIO-16-0005 1000-17-4-16 0 11/30/16 PR I6-0376Q S-134484T South Dyer Lot S10-16-000L 1000-17-6-14.2 12/1/16 ** -- PR16-0377 S-134469T Tuthill House SIO-16-0005 1000-17-4-16.0 11/30/16 PR16-0378`** S-117469T Main Road SIO-16-0007 1 1000-17-6-14.2 12/1/16 A„ r C Dear Ms.Tuthill, The above referenced wells have been sampled and the complete water analysis is enclosed for your review. At the time of the initial sampling, tetmbydTsfttyh-idi=ts=typiea#y-found as~a=resttlt-akhe-Lug cooC�ponentssused�t;�R'U-vv l: c,(wstr de`d-Ne T a e apt -a-r s(NYSS- and/oi-leNzIs--=nom lY�s e tie-wills.-denoted b, 11 --terick(*) in the table above. After the wells were air-sparged, re-samples for volatile organic compounds that included'this compound were collected on 3/8/17&3/9/17 by the Department. The re-samples met standards, however, some of the wells still had detects near the NYSS. �Litrate;leacels.�xce�ded-the-c..��n.r,,. „.�y test-�v-e1.l�+ani�a.�,^£�r�g�L�-l�t�t�aere=belthe�a�irxrticrn C' taminant--1>e"pl �-"-'�r-i� m�g�' - �djt:ionat4}�h=ae�ltTve�c�f somen�sxzcide�ompoitndsutee - rrri Ing water andars t'n ttt�veli?�enat� rt" asterisks__ *�*h Please see the lab results under herbicide metabolites for their levels. Lastly, well # S- I 17469T exceeded the drinking water standard foAll other results Inet NYSDOH Drinking Water Standards and SCDHS test well standards. r .Y OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY—360 YAPHANK AVENUE,SUITE 1 C—YAPHANK,NY 11980 PHONE: (631)852-5810—FAX. (631)852-5787 lth PublicHea d 'moi A copy of the completed analysis is being forwarded to Ms.Michelle Ersbak at our Office of Wastewater Management located at 360 Yaphank Avenue,Suite 2C,Yaphank. If you have any questions concerning these water-sample results,feel free to contact this office. Be sure to have your Private Request#available when making inquiries to this office concerning these water samples. Sincerely, Anthony J. Condos Public Health Sanitarian Bureau of Drinking Water cc: Michelle Ersbak—,SCDHS OWM Carol Tuthill ✓ Condon Engineering PC P 1 S SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS 7� Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0372 1Vo^-f ZfOW', L,-/- iS Location: MAIN ROAD, ORIENT Sample Date: 11/30/2016 Sample Location: S134481T Sanitarian: ISO TKI` - Treatment: NONE Field No.: 702-847-16-11-30 es: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. alinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or ---ion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL Results for Sample Group: ALDICARB PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Total Aldicarb (calc).................. < 0.0 ug/L Carbaryl............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb............................... < 0.5 3.00 ug/L 1-Naphthol............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfoxlde..................... < 0.5 4.00 ug/L Methomyl............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfone....................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L Propoxur (Baygon)...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Carbofuran............................. < 0.5 40.00 ug/L Methiocarb............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 3-Hydroxycarbofuran.................... < 0-5 50.00 ug/L Methiocarb sulfone..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Oxamyl................................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: CHLORINATED PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services alpha-BHC.............................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 4,4-DDD................................ < 0.2 5.00 ug/L beta-BHC............................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 4,4-DDT................................ < 0.2 5.00 ug/L gamma-BHC (Lindane).................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Endrin................................. < 0.01 2.00 ug/L delta-BHC.............................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Chlordane.............................. < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor............................. < 0.04 0.40 ug/L Alachlor............................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor epoxide..................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Methoxychlor........................... < 0.1 40.00 ug/L Aldrin................................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Endosulfan II.......................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Dieldrin............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan I........................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromoethane...................... < 0.01 0.05 ug/L Dacthal................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane............ < 0.02 0.20 ug/L 4,4-DDE................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: DACTHAL PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Monomethyltetrachloroterephthalate..... < 5. 50.00 ug/L Tetrachloroterephthalic acid........... < 5. 50.00 ug/L _== Results for Sample Group: DIOXANE analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services 1,4-Dioxane............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: HERBICIDE METABOLITES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Didealkylatrazine (G-28273)............ < 0.8 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Deisopropylatrazane (G-28279).......... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron............................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Desethylatrazine (G-30033)............. < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Caffeine............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 9acloprid........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dinoseb........i....................... 3 7.00 ug/L 'Jacloprid Urea...................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol A.... ....................... < 0:2 50.00 ug/L OA (Oxanili.c Acid)............ < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Diuron......... ....................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Alachlor ESA (Sulfonic Acrd)........... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Phenytoin (Dila tin)................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-37735)..... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 4-Hydroxyphenyt in..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor OA (CGA-51202)............. < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Diethyltoluamid (DEET)................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor ESA (CCA-354743)........... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Acetaminophen.. ....................... < 0.2' 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-41638)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol B.... ....................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-40172)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Estrone........ ....................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-67125)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L 17 alpha Ethynylestradlol.............. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 2-HydroxyAtrazine (G-34048)............ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Diethylstilbest ol..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Malaoxon............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 17 beta Estrada 1...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Trichlorfon............................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L 4-Androstene-31 7-drone................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Slduron................................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Picaridin...... ....................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dichlorvos............................. < 0.6 50.00 ug/L Propachlor ESA. ...................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Propamocarb hydrochloride.............. < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Propachlor OA.. ....................... < 0.3 5.00 ug/L 2,6-Dichlorobenzamide.................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Testosterone... ....................... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Ibuprofen.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Equilin........ < 0.7 50.00 ug/L Gemfibrozil............................ < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Estriol........ ....................... < 0.7 50.00 ug/L Metalaxyl.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: METALS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Lithium-------------------------------- = 1.43 ug/L Cadmium (Cd)--......................... < 1. 5.00 ug/L Beryllium (Be)......................... < 0.2 4.00 ug/L Tin........... ...................... < 0.5 ug/L Aluminum (Al).......................... < 5. ug/L Antimony (Sb).......................... < 0.2 6.00 ug/L Titanium (Ti).......................... < 1. ug/L Tellurium.............................. < 0.5 ug/L Vanadium (V)........................... < 1. ug/L Barium (Ba)............................ = 14. 2000.00 ug/L Chromium (Cr).......................... = 2. 100.00 ug/L Mercury (Hg)........................... < 0.3 2.00 ug/L Manganese (Mn)......................... = 0.039 0.30 mg/L Thallium (T1).......................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Cobalt (Co)............................ < 1. ug/L Lead (Pb)..... ...................... < 1. 15.00 ug/L Nickel (Ni)............................ = 2.3 100.00 ug/L Thorium (Th).. ...................... < 2. ug/L Copper (Cu)............................ < 5. 1300.00 ug/L Uranium....... ...................... < 0.5 30.00 ug/L Zinc (Zn).............................. < 5. 5000.00 ug/L Calcium................................ = 10.4 mg/L Germanium.............................. < 2.5 ug/L Iron (Fe)..... ...................... < 0.1 0.30 mg/L Arsenic (As)........................... < 1. 10.00 ug/L Iron + Manganese (Combined, Calc)...... = 0.039 0.50 mg/L Selenium (Se).......................... < 1. 50.00 ug/L Potassium..... ...................... = 1.2 mg/L Strontium.............................. = 68.8 ug/L Magnesium.... ...................... = 6.0 mg/L Molybdenum (Mo)........................ < 1. ug/L Sodium (Na)............................ = 19.8 mg/L xer (Ag)............................ < 2.5 100.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: RADIOLOGICAL analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Gross alpha............................ < 1.0 15.00 pCi/L Tritium................................ < 200. 20000 pCi/L Gross beta............................. = 1.3 50.00 pCi/L RESULTS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.... SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: 16-0372 Location: MAIN ROAD, ORIENT Sample Date: 1/30/2016 Sample Location: S134481T Sanitarian: KRAKOWSKI Treatment: NONE Field No.: 702-847-16-11-30 es: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per Mer. !alinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or ;,.ion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet shoulc not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL' not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE ===== Results for Sample Group: STANDARD INORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services pH-Lab................................. = 6.7 N/A Nitrate................................ = 3.9 10.00 mg/L Specific Conductivity-Lab.............. = 219. umho/u cm Bromide................................ < '0_05 mg/L Chloride (Cl).......................... = 23. 250.00 mg/L Orthophosphate......................... < 0.5 mg/L Sulfate (SO4).......................... = 10. 250.00 mg/L Fluoride............................... < 0.2 2.20 mg/L Ammonia (NH3-N)........................ < 0.5 mg/L T. Alkalinity.......................... = 41. mg/L Nitrite (NO2-N)........................ < 0.1 1.00 mg/L Hexavalent Chromium.................... = 1.73 ug/L Results for Sample Group: SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS METHOD 525 analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services ___ 1-Methylnaphthalene.................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L EPTC................................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 2-Methylnapthalene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Ethofumesate........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acenaphthene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Ethyl Parathion........................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acenaphthylene......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Fluoranthene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acetochlor............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Fluorene............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Alachlor............................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Hexachlorobenzene...................... < 0.1 1.00 ug/L Allethrin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Hexachlorocyclogentadiene.............. < 0.1 5.00 ug/L Anthracene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Hexachloroethane....................... < 1.0 5.00 ug/L Atrazine............................... < 0.1 3.00 ug/L Hexazinone............................. < 1.0 50.00 ug/L Azoxystrobin........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benfluralin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Iodofenphos............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benzo(A)Anthracene..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Iprodione.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(B)Fluoranthene................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Isofenphos............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(GHI)Perylene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Kelthane.......i.......... ............ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(K)Fluoranthene................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Malathion......i....................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(A)Pyrene......................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Metalaxyl.......'*..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benzophenone........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Methoprene............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benzyl butyl phthalate................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Methoy_ychlor........................... < 0.1 50.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)adipate............... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl Parathion....................... < 0.2 50,.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate............. < 3.0 6.00 ug/L Metolachlor............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol A............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Naled (Dibrom)......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bloc................................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Napropamide............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L nacil............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Pendimethalin.......................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L chlor.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Pentachlorobenzene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L )amazepine........................... < 0.5 50.00 uo/L Pentachloronitrobenzene................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Carbazole.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Permethrin............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Carisoprodol........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Phenanthrene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chlordane.............................. < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Piperonyl butoxide..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chlorofenvinphos....................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prometon............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chloroxylenol.......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prometryne............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chlorpyriphos.......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Propachlor............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chrysene............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Propiconazole (Tilt)................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Cyfluthrin............................. < 0.2 50,00 ug/L Pyrene................................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Cypermethrin........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Resmethrin............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dacthal........................4....... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Ronstar................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Deltamethrin........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Simazine............................... < 0.07 4.00 ug/L Dibenzo(A,H)Anthracene................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Sumithrin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dibutyl Phthalate...................... < 1.0 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dichlobenil............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Terbacil............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dichlorvos............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Triadimefon............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dieldrin............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Triclosan.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Diethyl phthalate...................... < 1.0 50.00 ug/L Trifluralin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Diethyltoluamide (DEET)................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L vinclozolin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dimethyl phthalate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Total Triazines + Metabolites (Calc)... < 0. 4.00 ug/L Dioctyl Phthalate...................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Etofenprox............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Disulfoton sulfone..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Etofenprox alpha-CO.................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosul£an Sulfate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prallethrin..........._................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: SURFACTANTS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services MBAS (LAS,MW=348.47)................... < 0.1 mg/L RESULTS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.... �y a SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0372 Location: MAIN ROAD, ORIENT Sample Date: 11/30/2016 Sample Location: S134481T Sanitarian: KRAKOWSKI Treatment: NONE Field No.: 702-847-16-11-30 tes: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. ` salinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or _:ion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE ___= Results for Sample Group: VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Chlorodifluoromethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ua/L Chlorobenzene.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethylbenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloroethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L o-Xylene............................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromomethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L m & p-Xylene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloromethane.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Total Xylenes.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Vinyl Chloride......................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methylene Chloride..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Diethyl Ether.......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Acrylonitrile.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L trans 1,2 Dichloroethene............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethyl Methacrylate..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chloroform---------------_...____---- = 14.0 80.00 ug/L 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Tri,-methylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,1 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichlorobenzene (o)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Tetrachloride................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (m)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1-Bromo-2-Chloroethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (p)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Diethylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichloroethene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L -1,2,4,5 Terramethylbenzene............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Bromo-l-Chloropropane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromoform.............................. < 0.5 80.00 ug/L Ethenylbenzene (Styrene)............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrachloroethene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isopropylbenzene....................._. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Propylbenzene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Freon 113.............................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L tort-Butylbenzene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dibromomethane......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L sec-Butylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Isopropyltoluene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Isothiocyanate.................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L n-Butylbenzene......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Disulfide....................... < 0.5 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Methacrylate.................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl-Tent-Butyl-Ether (MTBE)......... < 0.5 10.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Naphthalene............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Bromodichloromethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobutane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L - - Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Sulfide......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,3-Dichloropropene................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dimethyldisulfide...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L ms-1,3-Dichloropropene.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromobenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,2 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Butanone (MEK)....................... < 20. 50.00 ug/L 1,1,1,2 Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran........................ = 79. 50.00 ug/,,Lc: 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Allyl chloride......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichloropropane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methacrylonitrile...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L d-Limonene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,3 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Propanal............................... < 15. 50.00 ug/L Bromochloromethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L isobutane.............................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L Benzene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Butane............................... < 2. 50.00 ug/L Toluene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0372 RPF�5:&r- Location: MAIN ROAD, ORIENT Sample Date: 03/09/2017 Sample Location: S-134481T Sanitarian: Treatment: NONE Field No.: 278-847-17-03-09 Notes: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. calinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or :ion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted mould not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL Results for Sample Group: VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Chlorodifluoromethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorobenzene.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethylbenzene................:.......... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloroethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L o-Xylene............................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromomethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L m & p-Xylene...................... .... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloromethane.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Total Xylenes.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Vinyl Chloride......................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methylene Chloride..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Diethyl Ether.......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Acrylonitrile.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L trans 1,2 Dichloroethene............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethyl Methacrylate..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chloroform............................. = 4.6 80.00 ug/L 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,1 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichlorobenzene (o)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Tetrachloride................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (m)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1-Bromo-2-Chloroethane................. < 0.5 5.00 uo/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (p)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Diethylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichloroethene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4,5 Tetramethylbenzene............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorodabromomethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Bromo-l-Chloropropane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromoform.............................. < 0.5 80.00 ug/L Ethenylbenzene (Styrene)............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrachloroethene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isopropylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Propylbenzene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Freon 113.............................. < 0.5 5.00 uo/L tert-Butylbenzene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dibromomethane......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L sec-Butylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 uc/L 1,1 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Isopropyltoluene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Isothiocyanate.................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L n-Butylbenzene......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Disulfide....................... < 0.5 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Methacrylate.................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl-Tera-Butyl-Ether (MTBE)......... < 0.5 10.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethene < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Naphthalene............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Bromodichloromethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobutane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2,3 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Sulfide......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L c_is-1,3-Dichloropropene................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dimethyldisulfide...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L is-1,3-D.ichloropropene.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromobenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L ,2 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Butanone (MEK)....................... < 20: 50.00 ug/L _,-,1,2 Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran........................ - 30. 50_00_ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Allyl chloride......................... < 0.5 5.0^0 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichloropropane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methacrylonitrile............,.......... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L d-Limonene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,3 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Propanal............................... < 15. 50.00 ug/L Bromochloromethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isobutane.............................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L Benzene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Butane............................... < 2. 50.00 ug/L Toluene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L ., SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS /U01�'fi�( `J��� 45fl Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0373 �`� �O✓N� Location: MAIN ROAD, ORIENT Sample Date.•-r-1-1/-30/20T6 _ Sample Location: S-134480T Sanitarian: R ROWSKI Treatment: NONE Field No.: 703-847-16-11-30 ' -Dtes: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. lkalinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or :tion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL Results for Sample Group: ALDICARB PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Total Aldicarb (calc).................. < 0.0 ug/L Carbaryl............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb............................... < 0.5 3.00 ug/L 1-Naphthol............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfoxide..................... < 0.5 4.00 ug/L Methomyl................................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfone....................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L Propoxur (Baygon)...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Carbofur Y y 4 = ..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Oxamyloxacarbofuran:::::::::: � 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methiocarb sulfone......... < 0.5 SD.'00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: CHLORINATED PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services alpha-BHC.............................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 4,4-DDD................................ < 0.2 5.00 ug/L beta-BHC............................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 4,4-DDT................................ < 0.2 5.00 ug/L gamma-BHC (Lindane).................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Endrin................................. < 0.01 2.00 ug/L delta-BHC.............................. < 0.2 5.00 uo/L Chlordane.............................. < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor............................. < 0.04 0.40 ug/L Alachlor............................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor epoxide..................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Methoxychlor........................... < 0.1 40.00 ug/L Aldrin................................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Endosulfan II.......................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Dieldrin............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan I........................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromoethane...................... < 0.01 0.05 ug/L Dacthal................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane............ < 0.02 0.20 ug/L 4,4-DDE................................ < 0.2 50.00 ua/L Results for Sample Group: DACTRAL PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Monomethyltetrachloroterephthalate..... < 5. 50.00 ug/L Tetrachloroterephthalic acid........... < 5. 50.00 ug/L -_= Results for Sample Group: DIOXANE analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services 1,4-Dioxane............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: HERBICIDE METABOLITES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Didealkylatrazine (G-28273)............ < 0.8 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Deisopropylatrazine (G-28279).......... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron.......................:..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Desethylatrazine (G-30033)............. < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Caffeine............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L --idacloprid........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dinoseb................................ < 0.3 7.00 ug/L Ldacloprid Urea...................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol A............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L ichlor OA (Oxanilic Acid)............ < 0.4 50.00 ua/L Diuron................................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Alachlor ESA (Sulfonic Acid)........... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Phenytoin (Dilantin)................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-37735)..... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 4-Hydroxyphenytoin..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor OA (CGA-51202)............. < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Diethyltoluamide (DEET)................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor ESA (CGA-354743)........... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Acetaminophen.......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-41638)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol B............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-40172)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Estrone................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-67125)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L 17 alpha Ethynylestrad_ol.............. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 2-HydroxyAtrazine (G-34048)............ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Diethylstilbestrol..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Malaoxon............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 17 beta Estradiol...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Trichlorfon............................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L 4-Androstene-3,17-dione................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Siduron................................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Picarldin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dichlorvos............................. < 0.6 50.00 ug/L Propachlor ESA......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Propamocarb hydrochloride.............. < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Propachlor OA........................... < 0.3 5.00 ug/L 2,6-Dichlorobenzamide.................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Testosterone........................... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Ibuprofen.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Equilin................................ < 0.7 50.00 ug/L Gemfibrozil............................ < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Estriol................................ < 0.7 50.00 ug/L Metalaxyl.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: METALS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services --- ---- -- -_---- Lithium. < 1. ug/L Cadmium (Cd)........................... < 1. 5.00 ug/L Beryllium (Be)......................... < 0.2 4.00 ug/L Tin.................................... < 0.5 ug/L Aluminum (Al).......................... = 20. ug/L Antimony (Sb).......................... < 0.2 6.00 ug/L Titanium (Ti).......................... = 1. ug/L Tellurium.............................. < 0.5 ug/L Vanadium (V)........................... < 1. ug/L Barium (Ba)............................ = 22. 2000.00 ug/L Chromium (Cr).......................... = 1. 100.00 ug/L Mercury (Hg)........................... < 0.3 2.00 ug/L Manganese (Mn)......................... = 0.048 0.30 mg/L Thallium (T1).......................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Cobalt (Co)............................ < 1. ug/L Lead (Pb).............................. < 1. 15.00 ug/L Nickel (Ni)............................ = 1.8 100.00 ug/L Thorium (Th)........................... < 2. ug/L Copper (Cu)............................ < 5. 1300.00 ug/L Uranium................................ < 0.5 30.00 ug/L Zinc (Zn).............................. < 5. 5000.00 ug/L Calcium................................ = 12.8 mg/L Germanium.............................. < 2.5 ug/L Iron (Fe)..........I...........I....... < 0.1 0.30 mg/L Arsenic (As)........................... < 1. 10.00 ug/L Iron + Manganese (Combined, Calc)...... = 0.048 0.50 mg/L Selenium (Se).......................... < 1. 50.00 ug/L Potassium.............................. = 1.7 mg/L Strontium.............................. = 94.7 ug/L Magnesium....:......................... = 8.7 mg/L Molybdenum (Mo)........................ < 1. ug/L Sodium (Na)............................ = 26.7 mg/L (Ag)............................ < 2.5 100.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: RADIOLOGICAL analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Gross alpha............................ < 1.0 15.00 pCi/L Tritium................................ < 200. 20000 pCi/L Gross beta............................. = 1.8 50.00 pCi/L RESULTS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.... "t 1 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0373 Location: MAIN ROAD, ORIENT Sample Date: 11/30/2016 sample Location: S-134480T Sanitarian: KRAKOWSKI Treatment: NONE Field No.: 703-847-16-11-30 Dtes: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. Lkalinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or ;tion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE 1 1 - === Results for Sample Group: STANDARD INORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services pH-Lab................................. = 6.7 N/A Nitrate................................ = i 6.5 - 10.00_ mZJ/L Specific Conductivity-Lab.............. = 300. umho/0 cm Bromide................................ < 5 mg/L Chloride (Cl).......................... = 34. 250.00 mg/L Orthophosphate......................... < 0.5 mg/L Sulfate (SO4).......................... = 27. 250.00 mg/L Fluoride............................... < 0.2 2.20 mg/L Ammonia (NH3-N)........................ < 0.5 mg/L T. Alkalinity.......................... = 34. mg/L Nitrite (NO2-N)........................ < 0.1 1.00 mg/L Hexavalent Chromium.................... = 0.81 ug/L ---= Results for Sample Group: SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS METHOD 525 analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services 1-Methylnaphthalene.................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L EPTC................................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 2-Methylnapthalene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Ethofumesate........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acenaphthene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Ethyl Parathion........................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acenaphthylene......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Fluoranthene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acetochlor............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Fluorene............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Alachlor............................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Hexachlorobenzene...................... < 0.1 1.00 ug/L Allethrin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Hexachlorocyclopentadiene.............. < 0.1 5.00 ug/L Anthracene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Hexachloroethane....................... < 1.0 5.00 ug/L Atrazine............................... < 0.1 3.00 ug/L Hexazinone............................. < 1.0 50.00 ug/L Azoxystrobin........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benfluralin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Iodofenphos............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Senzo(A)Anthracene..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Iprodione.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(B)Fluoranthene................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Isofenphos............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(GHI)Perylene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Kelthane............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(K)Fluoranthene................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Malathion.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(A)Pyrene......................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Metalaxyl.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benzophenone........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Methoprene............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benzyl butyl phthalate................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Methoxychlor........................... < 0.1 50.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)adipate............... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl Parathion....................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate............. < 3.0 6.00 ug/L Metolachlor............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol A............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Naled (Dibrom)......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bloc................................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Napropamide............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 0macil............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Pendimethalin.......................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L achlor.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Pentachlorobenzene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L bamazepine < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Pentachloronitrobenzene................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Carbazole.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Permethrin............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Carisoprodol........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Phenanthrene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chlordane.............................. < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Piperonyl butoxide..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chlorofenvinphos....................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prometon............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chloroxylenol.......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prometryne............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chlorpyriphos.......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Propachlor............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chrysene............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Propiconazole (Tilt)................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Cyfluthrin............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Pyrene................................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Cypermethrin........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Resmethrin............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dacthal................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Ronstar................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Deltamethrin........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Slmazine............................... < 0.07 4.00 ug/L ' Dibenzo(A,H)Anthracene................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Sumithrin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dibutyl Phthalate...................... < 1.0 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dlchlobenll............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Terbacil............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dichlorvos............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Triadimefon............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dieldrin............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Triclosan.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Diethyl phthalate...................... < 1.0 50.00 ug/L Trifluralin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Diethyltoluamide (DEET)..............1.. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Vinclozolin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dimethyl phthalate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Total Triazines + Metabolites (Calc)... < 0. 4.00 ug/L Dioctyl Phthalate...................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Etofenprox............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dlsulfoton sulfone..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Etofenprox alpha-CO.................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prallethrin............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L ---- Results for Sample Group: SURFACTANTS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services MBAS (LAS,M`A7=348.47)................... < 0.1 mg/L RESULTS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.... SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Reauestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0373 Location: MAIN ROAD, ORIENT Sample Date: 11/30/2016 Sample Location: S-134480T Sanitarian: KRAKOWSKI Treatment: NONE Field No.: 703-847-16-11-30 Dtes: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. Lkalinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum, contaminant level (MCL), or :tion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM, PRECEDING PAGE =__= Results for Sample Group: VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Chlorodifluoromethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorobenzene.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethylbenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloroethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L o-Xylene............................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromomethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L m & p-Xylene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloromethane.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Total Xylenes.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Vinyl Chloride......................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methylene Chloride..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Diethyl Ether.......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Acrylonitrile.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ua/L trans 1,2 Dichloroethene............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethyl Methacrylate..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chloroform............................. = 2.9 80.00 ug/L 1,3,5 Tri.methylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,1 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichlorobenzene (o)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Tetrachloride................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (m)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1-Bromo-2-Chloroethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (p)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Diethylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichloroethene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4,5 Tetramethylbenzene............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Bromo-l-Chloropropane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromoform.............................. < 0.5 80.00 ug/L Ethenylbenzene (Styrene)............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrachloroethene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isopropylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Propylbenzene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Freon 113.............................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L tert-Butylbenzene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dibromomethane......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L sec-Butylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Isopropyltoluene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Isothiocyanate.................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L n-Butylbenzene......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Disulfide....................... < 0.5 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Methacrylate.................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether (MTBE)......... < 0.5 10.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Naphthalene............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Bromodichloromethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobutane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L --,3 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Sulfide......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,3-Dichloropropene................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dimethyldisulfide.............:........ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L :'ins-1,3-Dichloropropene.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromobenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,2 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Butanone (MEK)....................... < 20. 50.00 ug/L 1,1,1,2 Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran........................ = 45. 50.00 ua/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Allyl chloride......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichloropropane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methacrylonitrile...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L d-Limonene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,3 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Propanal............................... < 15. 50.00 ug/L Bromochloromethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isobutane.............................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L Benzene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L -n-Butane............................... < 2. 50.00 ug/L Toluene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L l J 1 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS T�� Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: R16-0373 Location: MAIN ROAD, ORIENT Sample Date: 03-/09 2017 Sample Location: S-134480T Sanitarian: Treatment: NONE Field No.: 280-847-17-03-05 "-rtes: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. lkalinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or :tion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL Results for Sample Group: VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Chlorodifluoromethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorobenzene.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethylbenzene < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloroethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L o-Xylene............................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromomethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L m & p-Xylene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloromethane.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Total Xylenes.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Vinvl Chloride......................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methylene Chloride..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Diethyl Ether.......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Acrylonitrile.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L trans 1,2 Dichloroethene............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethyl Methacrylate..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chloroform = 0.6 80.00 ug/L 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,1 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichlorobenzene (o)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Tetrachloride................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (m)................ < Ot5 5.00 ug/L 1-Bromo-2-Chloroethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (p)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Diethylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichloroethene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4,5 Tetramethylbenzene............. < 0.5 5.00 uc/L Chlorodibromomethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Bromo-l-Chloropropane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromoform.............................. < 0.5 80.00 ug/L Ethenylbenzene (Styrene)............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrachloroethene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isopropylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Propylbenzene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Freon 113.............................. < 0.5 5.00 uo/L tert-Butylbenzene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dibromomethane......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L sec-Butylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Isopropyltoluene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Isothiocyanate.................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L n-Butylbenzene......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Disulfide....................... < 0.5 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Methacrylate.................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether (MTBE)......... < 0.5 10.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Naphthalene............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Bromodichloromethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobutane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2,3 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Sulfide......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L pis-1,3-Dichloropropene................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dimethyldisulfide...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L tns-1,3-Dichloropropene.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromobenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L ,2 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Butanone (MEK)....................... < 20. 50.00 ug/L .i,i,1,2 Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran........................ = 47. 50.00 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Allyl chlori.de......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichloropropane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methacrylonitrile...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L d-Limonene < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,3 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Propanal............................... < 15. 50.00 ug/L Bromochloromethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isobutane.............................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L Benzene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Butane............................... < 2. 50.00, ug/L Toluene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L f SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS SD, -rz 2 D 3"A Reauestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Recruest No.: PR16-0374 7 'location: 26700 MAIN RD, LOT 1, ORIENT Sample Date:,' Samnle Location: S-134483T Sanitarian 7MIZOWS'T7i Treatment: NONE Field No.: 706-847-16-12-01 tes: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. kalinity 1s reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or tion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL Results for Sample Group: ALDICARB PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Total Aldicarb (calc).................. < 0.0 ug/L Carbaryl............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb............................... < 0.5 3.00 uo/L 1-Naphthol............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfoxide..................... < 0.5 4.00 ug/L Methomyl............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfone....................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L Propoxur (Baygon)...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Carbofuran............................. < 0.5 40.00 ug/L Methiocarb............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 3-Hydroxycarbofuran.................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methiccarb sulfone..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Oxamyl................................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: CHLORINATED PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services alpha-BHC.............................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 4,4-DDD................................ < 0.2 5.00 ug/L beta-BHC............................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 4,4-DDT................................ < 0.2 5.00 ug/L gamma-BHC (Lindane).................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Endrin................................. < 0.01 2.00 ug/L delta-BHC.............................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Chlordane.............................. < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor............................. < 0.04 0.40 ug/L Alachlor............................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor epoxide..................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Methoxychlor........................... < 0.1 40.00 ug/L Aldrin................................. < 0.2 5.00 uq/L Endosulfan II.......................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/TL Dielarin............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan I........................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromoethane...................... < 0.01 0.05 ug/L Dacthal................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane............ < 0.02 0.20 ug/L 4,4-DDE................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L =_= Results for Sample Group: DACTHAL PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Monomethyltetrachloroterephthalate..... < 5. 50.00 ug/L Tetrachloroterephthalic acid........... = 27. 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: DIOXANE analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services 1,4-Dioxane............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: HERBICIDE METABOLITES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Didealkylatrazine (G-28273)............ < 0.8 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Deisopropylatrazine (G-28279).......... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron............................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Desethylatrazine (G-30033)............. < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Caffeine............................... <_ 0.2 50.00 ug/L " "dacloprid........................... < 0.2 50.00 uq/L Dinoseb................................ < 0.3 7.00 ug/L dacloprid Urea...................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol A............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L chlor OA (Oxanilic Acid)............ < 0.4 50.00 ua/L Diuron................................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Alachlor ESA (Sulfonic Acid)........... = 1.5 50.00 ug/L Phenytoin (Dilantin)................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-37735)..... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 4-Hydroxyphenytoin..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor OA (CGA-51202)............. = 0.3 50.00 ug/L Diethyltoluamide (DEET)................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor ESA (CGA-354743)........... = 0.8 50.00 ug/L Acetaminophen.......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-41638)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol B............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-40172)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Estrone................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-67125)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L 17 alpha Ethynylestradiol.............. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 2-HydroxyAtrazine (G-34048)............ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Diethylstilbestrol..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Malaoxon............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 17 beta Estradiol...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Trichlorfon............................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L 4-Androstene-3,17-drone................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Siduron................................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Picaridin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dichlorvos.............................. < 0.6 50.00 ug/L Propachlor ESA......................... < 0.2 -50.00 ug/L Propamocarb hydrochloride.............. < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Propachlor OA.......................... < 0.3 5.00 ug/L 2,6-Dichlorobenzamide.................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Testosterone........................... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Ibuprofen.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Equilin................................ < 0.7 50.00 ug/L Gemfibrozil............................ < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Estriol................................ < 0.7 50.00 ug/L Metalaxyl.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: METALS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Lithium................................ < 1_ ua/L Cadmium (Cd)........................... < 1. 5.00 uc4/L Beryllium (Be)......................... < 0.2 4.00 ug/L Tin.................................... < 0.5 ug/L Aluminum (Al).......................... < 5. ug/L Antimony (Sb).......................... < 0.2 6.00 ug/L Titanium (Ti).......................... < 1. ug/L Tellurium.............................. < 0.5 ug/L Vanadium (V)........................... < 1. ug/L Barium (Ba)............................ = 39. 2000.00 ug/L Chromium (Cr).......................... < 1. 100.00 ug/L Mercury (Hg)........................... < 0.3 2.00 ug/L Manganese (Mn)......................... = 0.002 0.30 mg/L Thallium (Tl).......................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Cobalt (Co)............................ < 1. ug/L Lead (Pb).............................. < 1. 15.00 ug/L ck .,.......'........... = 1.1 100.00 ug/L Thorium (Th)........................... < 2. ug/L Copper (Cu)............................ < 5. 1300.00 ug/L Uranium................................ < 0.5 30.00 ug/L Zinc (Zn).............................. < 5. 5000.00 ug/L Calcium................................ = 33.9 mg/L Germanium.............................. < 2.5 ug/L Iron (Fe).............................. < 0.1 0.30 mg/L Arsenic (As)........................... < 1. 10.00 ug/L Iron + Manganese (Combined, Calc)...... = 0.002 0.50 mg/L Selenium (Se).......................... = 1. 50.00 ug/L Potassium.............................. = 6.8 mg/L Strontium.............................. = 191. ug/L Magnesium.............................. = 8.7 mg/L Molybdenum (Mo)........................ < 1. ug/L Sodium (Na)............................ = 28.1 mg/L rer (Ag)............................ < 2.5 100.00 ug/L f Results for Sample Group: RADIOLOGICAL analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Gross alpha............................ < i.0 15.00 pCi/L Tritium................................ < 200. 20000 pCi/L Gross beta............................. = 6.6 50.00 pCi/L RESULTS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.... ` 4 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0374 Location: 26700 MAIN RD, LOT 1, ORIENT Sample Date: 12/01/2016 Sample Location: S-134483T Sanitarian: KRAKOWSKI Treatment: NONE Field No.: 706-847-16-12-01 es: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. alinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or action level for' lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE ==== Results for Sample Group: STANDARD INORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services pH-Lab................................. = 6.5 N/A Nitrate................................ = 9.4 - 10.00 mg/L?y Specific Conductivity-Lab.............. = 471. umho/u cm Br�oside................................ = 0.101 mg/L Chloride (Cl).......................... = 64. 250.00 mg/L Orthophosphate......................... < 0.5 mg/L Sulfate (SO4).......................... = '59. 250.00 mg/L Fluoride............................... < 0.2 2.20 mg/L Ammonia (NH3-N)........................ < 0.5 mg/L T. Alkalinity.................I......... = 22. mg/L Nitrite (NO2-N)........................ < 0.1 1.00 mg/L Hexavalent Chromium.................... = 0.26 ug/L Results for Sample Group: SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS METHOD 525 analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services 1-Methylnaphthalene.................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L EPTC................................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 2-Methylnapthalene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Ethofumesate........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acenaphthene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Ethyl Parathion........................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acenaphthylene......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Fluoranthene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acetochlor............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Fluorene............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Alachlor............................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Hexachlorobenzene...................... < 0.1 1.00 ug/L Allethrin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Hexachlorocyclopentadiene.............. < 0.1 5.00 ug/L Anthracene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Hexachloroethane....................... < 1.0 5.00 ug/L Atrazine............................... < 0.1 3.00 ug/L Hexazinone............................. < 1.0 50.00 ua/L Azoxystrobin........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benfluralin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Iodofenphos............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benzo(A)Anthracene..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Iprodione.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(B)Fluoranthene................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Isofenphos............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(GHI)Perylene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Kelthane............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(K)Fluoranthene................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Malathion.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(A)Pyrene......................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Metalaxyl.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benzophenone........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L N,ethoprene............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benzyl butyl phthalate................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Methoxychlor........................... < 0.1 50.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)adipate............... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl Parathion....................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate............. < 3.0 6.00 ug/L Metolachlor............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol A............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Naled (Dibrom)......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bloc................................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Napropamide............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L nacil < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Pendimethalin.......................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 'achlor.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Pentachloroben;ene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L :a<'bamazepine.......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Pentachloronitrobenzene................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Carbazole.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Permethrin............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Carisoprodol........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Phenanthrene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chlordane.............................. < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Piperonyl butoxide..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 'Chlorofenvinphos....................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prometon............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chloroxylenol.......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prometryne............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chlorpyriphos.......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Propachlor............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chrysene............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Propiconazole (Tilt)................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Cyfluthrin............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Pyrene................................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Cypermethrin........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Resmethrin............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dacthal................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Ronstar................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Deltamethrin........................... < 0.5 50.00 ua/L Simazine............................... < 0.07 4.00 ug/L Dibenzo(A,H)Anthracene................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Sumithrin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dibutyl Phthalate...................... < 1.0 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dichlobenil.....................:...... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Terbacil................................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dichlorvos............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Triadimefon............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dieldrin....................:.......... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Triclosan.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Diethyl phthalate...................... < 1.0 50.00 ug/L Trifluralin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Diethyltoluamide (DEET)................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Vinclozolin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dimethyl phthalate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Total Triazines a- Metabolites (Calc)... < 0. 4.00 ug/L Dioctyl Phthalate...................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Etofenprox............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L .Disulfoton sulfone..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Etofenprox alpha-CO.................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate..................... < 0.2 1 50.00 ug/L Prallethrin............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: SURFACTANTS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services MBAS (LAS,MW=348.47)................... < 0.1 mg/L RESULTS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.... SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0374 Location: 26700 MAIN RD, LOT 1, ORIENT Sample Date: 12/01/2016 Sample Location: S-134483T Sanitarian: KRAKOA*SKI Treatment: NONE Field No.: 706-847-16-12-01 es: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. alinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or _ion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted snould not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE ===== Results for Sample Group: VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Chlorodifluoromethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorobenzene.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethylbenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloroethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L o-Xylene............................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromomethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L m s p-Xylene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloromethane.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Total Xylenes.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Vinyl Chloride......................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methylene Chloride..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Diethyl Ether.......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Acrylonitrile.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L trans 1,2 Dichloroethene............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethyl Methacrylate..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chloroform............................. < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,1 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichlorobenzene (o)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Tetrachloride................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (m)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1-Bromo-2-Chloroethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (p)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Diethylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichloroethene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4,5 Tetramethylbenzene............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Bromo-l-Chloropropane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromoform.............................. < 0.5 80.00 ug/L Ethenylbenzene (Styrene)............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrachloroethene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isopropylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Propylbenzene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Freon 113.............................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L tert-Butylbenzene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dibromomethane......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L sec-Butylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Isopropyltoluene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Isothiocyanate.................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L n-Butylbenzene......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Disulfide....................... < 0.5 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Methacrylate....:............... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether (MTBE)......... < 0.5 10.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Naphthalene............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Bromodichloromethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobutane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Sulfide < 0.5 50.00 ug/L -1,3-Dichloropropene................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L `Dimethyldisulfide...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L is-1,3-Dichloropropene.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromobenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,2 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Butanone (N,EK)....................... < 20. 50.00 ug/L 1,1,1,2 Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran........................ = 110. 50.00 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Allyl chloride......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichloropropane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methacrylonitrile...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L d-Limonene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,3 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Propanal............................... < 15. 50.00 ug/L Bromochloromethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isobutane.............................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L Benzene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Butane............................... < 2. 50.00 ug/L Toluene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1 °l `r (f, SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: TUTHILL QYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0374 lLu Location: 26700 MAIN RD, LOT 1, ORIENT Sample Date: 03/08/2017 Sample Location: S-134483T Sanitarian: C-KOMWSKI Treatment: NONE Field No.: 276-847-17-03-08 es: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. alinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or ion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely' restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL _---= Results for Sample Group: VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Chlorodifluoromethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorobenzene.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethylbenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloroethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L o-Xylene............................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromomethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L m & p-Xylene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloromethane.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Total Xylenes.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Chlororoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Vinyl Chloride......................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methylene Chloride..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Diethyl Ether.......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Acrylonitrile.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L trans 1,2 Dichloroethene............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethyl Methacrylate..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chloroform............................. = 0.6 80.00 ua/L 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ua/L 1,2 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 _ 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,1 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichlorobenzene (o)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Tetrachloride................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (m)................ < 0.5 5.00 ua/L 1-Bromo-2-Chloroethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (p)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Diethylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichloroethene.;...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4,5 Tetramethylbenzene............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Bromo-l-Chloropropane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromoform.............................. < 0.5 80.00 ug/L Ethenylbenzene (Styrene)............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrachloroethene < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isopropylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Propylbenzene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Freon 113.............................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L tert-Butylbenzene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dibromomethane......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L sec-Butylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Isopropyltoluene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Isothiocyanate.................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L n-Butylbenzene......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Disulfide....................... < 0.5 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Methacrylate.................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether (MTBE)......... < 0.5 10.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Naphthalene............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Bromodichloromethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobutane...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2,3 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Sulfide......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L -=- 1,3-Dichloropropene................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dimethyldisulfide...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L ,s-1,3-Dichl6ropropene.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromobenzene........................... < ` 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2 Trichloroethane................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Butanone (MEK)....................... < 20. 50.00 ug/L 1,1,1,2 Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran.........::............. = _ 47. 50.00 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Allyl chloride......................... < 0.5 5.00 u:/L 1,2,3 Trichloropropane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methacrylonitrile...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L, 2,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L d-Limonene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,3 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Proparal............................... < 15. 50.00 ug/L Bromochloromethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isobutane.............................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L Benzene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Butane............................... < 2. 50.00 ug/L Toluene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L � SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0375 - 1 Location: 21505 MAIN ROAD, ORIENT Sample Date: 1 3Sanitarian: CO Sample Location: 5-139482T Field No.: 701-847-16-11-30 Treatment: NONE- as: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. :unity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or action level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any N,CL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL Results for Sample Group: ALDICARB PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services <====005 = 50.00 ug/L Total Aldicarb (calc).................. < 0.0 ug/L Carbaryl.............................. Pldicarb............................... < 0.5 3.00 ug/L 1-Naphthol............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L ....... < 0.5 4.00 ug/L Methomyl............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L P dicarb-Sulfone....................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L Propoxur (Baygon)...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Carbofuran............................. < 0.5 40.00 ug/L Methiocarb............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 3-Hydroxycarbofuran.................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methiocarb sulfone..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Oxamyl................................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: CHLORINATED PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services alpha-BHC.............................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 4,4-DDD................................ < 0.2 5.00 ug/L beta-BHC............................... < 0.2• 5.00 ug/L 4,4-DDT................................ < 0.2 5.00 ug/L aamma-BRC (Lindane).................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Endrin................................. < 0.01 2.00 ug/L delta-BHC.............................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Chlordane.............................. < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor............................. < 0.04 0.40 ug/L Alachlor............................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor epoxide..................... < 0.02 0.20 uglL Methoxychlor........................... < 0.1 90.00 ug/L Aldrin................................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Endosulfan II.......................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Dieldrin............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan I........................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromoethane...................... < 0.01 0.05 ug/L Dacthal................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane............ < 0.02 0.20 ug/L 4,4-DDE................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: DACTHAL PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Monomethyltetrachloroterephthalate..... < 5. 50.00 ug/L Tetrachloroterephthalic acid........... < 5. 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: DIOXANE analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services 1,4-Dioxane............................ < 0.6 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: HERBICIDE METABOLITES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services -< 0.2 50.00 ug/L Didealkylatrazine (G-28273)............ < 0.8 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor........................... Deisopropylatrazine (G-28279).......... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron............................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L nasethylatrazine (G-30033)............. < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Caffeine............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L dacloprid........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dinoseb................................. < 0.3 7.00 ug/L :dacloprid Urea...................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol A............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L xiachlor OA (Oxanilic Acid)............. < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Diuron...... < - 0.2 50.00 u /L ........ Alachlor ESA (Sulfonic Acid)........ . < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Phenytoin (Dilantin)................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-37735).._.. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 4-Hydroxyphenytoin..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor OA (CGA-51202)............. < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Diethyltoluamide (DEET)................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor ESA (CCA-354743)........... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Acetaminophen.......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-41638)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Blsphenol B............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-40172)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Estrone................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-67125)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L 17 alpha Ethynylestradiol.............. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 2-HydroxyAtrazine (G-34048)............ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Diethylstilbestrol..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Malaoxon............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 17 beta Estradiol...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Trichlorfon............................ < 0.3 50.00 ua/L 4-Androstene-3,17-drone................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Siduron................................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Picaridin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dichlorvos............................. < 0.6 50.00 ug/L Propachlor ESA......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Propamocarb hydrochloride.............. < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Propachlor OA.......................... < 0.3 5.00 ua/L 2,6-Dichlorobenzamide.................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Testosterone........................... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Ibuprofen.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Equilin................................ < 0.7 50.00 ug/L Gemfibrozil............................ < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Estriol................................ < 0.7 50.00 ug/L Metalaxyl.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 7J = Results for Sample Group: METALS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Lithium................................ - 1.89 ug/L Cadmium (Cd)........................... < 1. 5.00 ug/L Beryllium (Be)......................... < 0.2 4.00 ug/L Tin.................................... < 0.5 ug/L Aluminum (Al).......................... < 5. ug/L Antimony (Sb).......................... < 0.2 6.00 ug/L Titanium (Ti).......................... < 1. ug/L Tellurium.............................. < 0.5 ug/L Vanadium (V)........................... < 1. ug/L Barium (Ba)................... = 13. 2000.00 ug/L ••„....•........ < 1. 100.00 u /L Mercury (Hg).......... Chromium (Cr)....... g Y ••••-••••••...... < 0.3 2.00 ug/L Manganese (Mn)......................... - 0.029 0.30 mg/L Thallium (Tl).......................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Cobalt (Co)............................ < 1. ug/L Lead (Pb).............................. < 1. 15.00 ug/L Nickel (Ni)............................ = 0.7 200.00 ug/L Thorium (Th)........................... < 2. ug/L Copper (Cu)............................ < 5. 1300.00 ug/L Uranium................................ < 0.5 30.00 ug/L Zinc (Zn).............................. < 5. 5000.00 ug/L Calcium................................ = 11.4 mg/L Germanium.............................. < 2.5 ug/L Iron (Fe).............................. < 0.1 0.30 mg/L Arsenic (As)........................... < 1. 10.00 ug/L Iron + Manganese (Combined, Calc)...... = 0.029 0.50 mg/L Selenium (Se).......................... < 1. 50.00 ug/L Potassium.............................. = 1.4 mg/L, Strontium.......................... ... = 66.2 ug/L Magnesium.............................. = 6.0 mg/L Molybdenum (MO)........................ < 1. ug/L Sodium (Na)............................ - 21.8 mg/L `Iver (Ag)............................. < 2.5 100.00 ug/L ---=== Results for Sample Group: RADIOLOGICAL analyzed by Suffolk county Department of Health Services ------ Gross alpha............................ < 1.0 15.00 pCi/L Tritium................................ < 200. 20000 C3./L Gross beta............................. = 1.5 50.00 pCi/L RESULTS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.... SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0375 Location: 21505 MAIN ROAD, ORIENT Sample Date• 11/30/2016 Sample Location: S-134462T Sanitarian: KRAKOWSKI Treatment: NONE Field No.: 701-847-16-11-30 as: '<' symbol means "less -than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. alinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. ", symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or ...ion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE ==== Results for Sample GrouD: STANDARD INORGANICS analyzea by Suffolk County Department of Health Services pH-Lab................................. = 7.0 N/A Nitrate................................ = 3.3 10.00 mg/L Specific Conductivity-Lab.............. = 234. umho/u cm Bromide................................ < 0.05 mg/L Chloride (Cl).......................... = 29. 250.00 me/L Orthophosphate < 0.5 mg/L Sulfate (SO4).......................... = 13. 250.00 mg/L Fluoride............................... < 0.2 2.20 mg/L Ammonia (NH3-N)........................ < 0.5 mg/L T. Alkalinity.......................... = 37. mg/L Nitrite (NO2-N)........................ < 0.1 1.00 mg/L Hexavalent Chromium.................... = 0.67 ug/L Results for Sample Group: SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS METHOD 525 analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services =_----- 1-Methylnaphthalene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L EPTC................................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 2-Methylnapthalene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Ethofumesate........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acenaphthene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Ethyl Parathion........................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acenaphthylene......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Fluoranthene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acetochlor............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Fluorene............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Alachlor............................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Hexachlorobenzene...................... < 0.1 1.00 ug/L Allethrin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Hexachlorocyclopentadiene.............. < 0.1 5.00 ug/L Anthracene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Hexachloroethane....................... < 1.0 5.00 ug/L Atrazine............................... < 0.1 3.00 ug/L Hexazinone............................. < 1.0 50.00 ug/L Azoxystrobin........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benfluralin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Iodofenphos............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benzo(A)Anthracene..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Iprodione.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(B)Fluoranthene................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Isofenphos............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(GHI)Perylene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Kelthane............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(K)Fluoranthene................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Malathion.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(A)Pyrene......................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Metalaxyl.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benzophenone........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Methoprene............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benzyl butyl phthalate................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Methoxychlor........................... < 0.1 50.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)adipate............... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl Parathion........................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate............. < 3.0 6.00 ug/L Metolachlor............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol A............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Naled (Dibrom)......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bloc................................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Napropamide............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L iacil............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Pendimethalin.......................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L ichlor.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Pentachlorobenzene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L amazepine.......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Pentachloronitrobenzene................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Carbazole.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Permethrin............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Carisoprodol........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Phenanthrene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chlordane.............................. < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Piperonyl butoxide..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chlorofenvinphos....................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prometon............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chloroxylenol........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prometryne............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chlorpyriphos.......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Propachlor............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chrysene............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Propiconazole (Tilt)................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Cyfluthrin............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Pyrene................................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Cypermethrin........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Resmethrin............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dacthal................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Ronstar..........................;..... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Deltamethrin........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Simazine............................... < 0.07 4.00' ug/L Dibenzo(A,H)Anthracene................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Sumithrin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dibutyl Phthalate...................... < 1.0 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dichlobenil............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Terbacil............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dichlorvos < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Triadi.mefon............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dieldrin............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Triclosan.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Diethyl phthalate...................... < 1.0 50.00 ug/L Trifluralin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Diethyltoluamide (DEET)................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Vinclozolin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dimethyl phthalate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Total Triazines + Metabolites (Calc)... < 0. 4.00 ug/L Dioctyl Phthalate...................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Etofenprox............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Disulfoton sulfone..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Etofenprox alpha-CO.................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prallethrin............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: SURFACTANTS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services MBAs (LAS,MW=348.47)................... < 0.1 mg/L RESULTS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.... SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0375 Location: 21505 MAIN ROAD, ORIENT Sample Date: 11/30/2016 Sample Location: S-134482T Sanitarian: KRAKOWSKI Treatment: NONE Field No.: 701-847-16-11-30 tes: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. kalinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or --tion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE ==_= Results for Sample Group: VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services thlorodifluoromethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorobenzene.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethylbenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloroethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L o-Xylene............................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromomezhane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L m'& p-Xylene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloromethane.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Total Xylenes.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Vinyl Chloride......................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methylene Chloride..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Diethyl Ether.......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Acrylonitrile.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L trans 1,2 Dichloroethene............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethyl Methacrylate..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chloroform............................. < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,1 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichlorobenzene (o)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Tetrachloride................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (m)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1-Bromo-2-Chloroethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (p)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Diethylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichloroethene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4,5 Tetramethylbenzene............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2=Bromo-l-Chloropropane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromoform.............................. < 0.5 80.00 ug/L Ethenylbenzene (Styrene)............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrachloroethene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isopropylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Propylbenzene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Freon 113.............................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L tert-Butylbenzene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dibromomethane......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L sec-Butylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Isopropyltoluene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Isothiocyanate.................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L n-Butylbenzene......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Disulfide....................... < 0.5 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Methacrylate.................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether (MTBE)......... < 0.5 10.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethene..................... < 0.5 5.00• ug/L Naphthalene............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Bromodi.chloromethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobutane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L �' Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Sulfide......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L -1,3-Dichloropropene................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dimethyldisulfide...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L _-- ns-1,3-Dichloropropene.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromobenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,2 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Butanone (MEK)....................... < 20. 50.00 ug/L-- 1,1,1,2 Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran........................ = 130. _ 50.00 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Allyl chloride......................... < `0:'5Y 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichloropropane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methacrylonitrale...................:.. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L d-L.imonene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,3 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Propanal............................... < 15. 50.00 ug/L Bromochloromethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isobutane........._.................... < 2. 50.00 ug/L Benzene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Butane............................... < 2. 50.00 ug/L Toluene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Rj-gMT- "[W -Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0375 Location: 21505 MAIN ROAD, ORIENT Sample Date: 03/08/2017 Sample Location: S-134482T Sanitarian- Treatment: NONE Field No.: 274-847-17-03-06 tes: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection_ mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. kalinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or --tion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's-not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL Results for Sample Group: VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Chlorodifluoromethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorobenzene ............ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethylbenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloroethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L o-Xylene............................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromomethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L m 6 p-Xylene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloromethane.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Total Xylenes.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Vinyl Chloride......................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene....:................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methylene Chloride..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Diethyl Ether........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Acrylonitrile.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L trans 1,2 Dichloroethene............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethyl Methacrylate..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chloroform............................. < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00, ug/L 1,2 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,1 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichlorobenzene (o)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Tetrachloride................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (m)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1-Bromo-2-Chloroethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (p)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Diethylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichloroethene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4,5 Tetramethylbenzene............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Bromo-1-Chloropropane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromoform.............................. < 0.5 80.00 ug/L Ethenylbenzene (Styrene)............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetracnloroethene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isopropylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichlorcethene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Propylbenzene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Freon 113.............................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L tert-Butylbenzene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dibromomethane......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L sec-Butylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Isopropyltoluene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Isothiocyanate.................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L n-Butylbenzene......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Disulfide....................... < 0.5 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Methacrylate.................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether (MTBE)......... < 0.5 10.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Naphthalene............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Bromodichloromethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobutane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2,3 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Sulfide......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L -1,3-Dichloropropene................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dimethyldisulfide...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L ns-1,3-Dichloropropene.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromobenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L ,2 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Butanone (MEK)....................... < 20. 50.00 ug/L 1,1,1,2 Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran........................ < 20. 50.00 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Allyl chloride......................... 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichloropropane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methacrylonitrile...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L d-Limonene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,3 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Propanal............................... < 15. 50.00 ug/L Bromochloromethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isobutane.............................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L Benzene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Butane............................... < 2. 50.00 ug/L Toluene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L ' J e - - SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS So • Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0376 3 eDv Location: MAIN RD,SOUTH DYER LOT #1, ORIENT Sample Date:--12/01/2016 Sample Location: S-134484T • - Sanitarian: I(E090WSKI Treatment: NONE Field No.: 704-847-16-12-01 -es: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. calinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or -cion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL Results for Sample Group: ALDICARB PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services =__=____------- Total Aldicarb (calc).................. < 0.0 ug/L Carbaryl............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb............................... < 0.5 3.00 ug/L 1-Naphthol............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfoxide..................... < 0.5 4.00 ug/L Methomyl............................... < 0.5 50.00 uo/L Aldicarb-Sulfone....................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L Propoxur (Baygon)...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Carbofuran............................. < 0.5 40.00 ug/L Methlocarb............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 3-Hydroxycarbofuran.................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methiocarb sulfone..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Oxamyl................................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L _---= Results for Sample Group: CHLORINATED PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services alpha-BHC.............................. < 0.2 5.00 ua/L 4,4-DDD................................ < 0.2 5.00 ua/L beta-BHC............................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 4,4-DDT................................ < 0.2 5.00 ug/L gamma-BHC (Lindane).................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Endrin................................. < 0.01 2.00 ug/L delta-BHC.............................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Chlordane.............................. < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor............................. c 0.04 0.40 ug%L Alachlor............................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor epoxide..................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Methoxychlor........................... < 0.1 40.00 ug/L Aldrin................................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Endosulfan II.......................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Dieldrin............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan I........................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromoethane...................... < 0.01 0.05 uc/L Dacthal................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane............ < 0.02 0.20 ug-/L 4,4-DDE................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L - -_= Results for Sample Group: DACTHAL PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Monomethyltetrachloroterephthalate..... < 5. 50.00 ug/L Tetrachloroterephthalic acid........... < 5. 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: DIOXANE analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services 1,4-Dioxane............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L ----- Results for Sample Group: HERBICIDE METABOLITES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Didealkylatrazine (G-28273)............ < 0.8 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Deisopropylatrazine (G-28279).......... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron............................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Desethylatrazine (G-30033)............. < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Caffeine............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 9acloprid........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dinoseb................................ < 0.3 7.00 ug/L 9acloprid Urea...................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol A............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L ___-hlor OR (Oxanilic Acid)............ < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Diuron................................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Alachlor ESA (Sulfonic Acid)........... = 1.6 50.00 ug/L Phenytoin (Dilantin)................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-37735)..... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 4-Hydroxyphenytoin..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor OA (CGA-51202)............. = 2.8 50.00 ug/L Diethyltoluamide (DEET)................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor ESA (CGA-354743)........... = 5.9 50.00 ug/L Acetaminoohen.......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-41638)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol B............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-40172)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Estrone................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CG.A-67125)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L 17 alpha Ethynylestradiol.............. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 2-HydroxyAtrazine (G-34048)............ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Diethylstilbestrol......:.............. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Malaoxon............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 17 beta Estradiol...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Trichlorfon............................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L 4-Androstene-3,17-dione................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Siduron................................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Plcaridln.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dichlorvos............................. < 0.6 50.00 ug/L Propachlor ESA......................... = 0.4 50.00 ug/L Propamocarb hydrochloride.............. < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Propachlor OA.......................... < 0.3 5.00 ug/L 2,6-Dichlorobenzamide.................. = 2.8 50.00 ua/L Testosterone........................... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Ibuprofen.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Equilin................................ < 0.7 50.00 ug/L Gemfibrozil............................ < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Estriol................................ < 0.7 50.00 ug/L Metalaxyl.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: METALS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Lithium. < 1. ug/L Cadmium (Cd)........................... < 1. 5.00 ug/L Beryllium (Be)......................... < 0.2 4.00 ug/L Tin.................................... < 0.5 ug/L Aluminum (Al).......................... < 5. ug/L Antimony (Sb).......................... < 0.2 6 .00 ug/L Titanium (Ti).......................... < 1. ug/L Tellurium.............................. < 0.5 ug/L Vanadium (v)........................... < 1. ug/L Barium (Ba)............................ = 19. 2000.00 ug/L Chromium (Cr).......................... < 1. 100.00 ug/L Mercury (Hg)........................... < 0.3 2.00 ug/L Manganese (Mn)......................... = 0.003 0.30 mg/L Thallium (T1).......................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L' Cobalt (Co)............................ < 1. ug/L Lead (Pb).............................. < 1. 15.00 ug/L Nickel (Ni)............................ = 0.9 100.00 ua/L Thorium (Th)........................... < 2. ug/L Copper (Cu).........................:.. < 5. 1300.00 ug/L Uranium................................ < 0.5 30.00 ug/L Zinc (Zn).............................. < 5. 5000.00 ug/L Calcium................................ = 25.7 mg/L Germanium.............................. 2 2.5 ug/L Iron (Fe).............................. < 0.1 0.30 mg/L Arsenic (As)........................... < 1. 10.00 ug/L Iron + Manganese (Combined, Calc)...... - 0.003 0.50 mg/L Selenium (Se).......................... < 1. 50.00 ug/L Potassium.............................. = 1.8 mg/L Strontium.............................. = 140. ug/L Magnesium.............................. = 14.9 mg/L Molybdenum (No)........................ < 1. ug/L Sodium (Na)............................ - 17.1 mg/L er (Ag)............................ < 2.5 100.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: RADIOLOGICAL analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Gross alpha............................ < 1.0 15.00 pCi/L Tritium................................ < 200. 20000 pCi/L Gross beta............................. = 1.8 50.00 pCi/L RESULTS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.... SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0376 Location: MAIN RD,SOUTH DYER LOT #l, ORIENT Sample Date: 12/01/2016 Sample Location: S-134484T Sanitarian: KRAKOWSKI Treatment: NONE Field No.: 704-847-16-12-01 es: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. alinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. *' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or action level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE ==_= Results for Sample Group: STANDARD INORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services pH-Lab................................. = 6.8 N/A Nitrate................................ = _9.6 10.00 mg/L Specific Conductivity-Lab.............. = 377. umho/u cm Bromide................................ < 0.05 mg/L Chloride (Cl).......................... = 24. 250.00 mg/L Orthophosphate......................... < 0.5 mg/L Sulfate (SO4).......................... = 72. 250.00 mg/L Fluoride............................... < 0.2 2.20 mg/L Ammonia (NH3-N)........................ < 0.5 mg/L T. Alkalinity.......................... = 29. mg/L Nitrite (NO2-N)........................ < 0.1 1.00 mg/L Hexavalent Chromium.................... = 0.04 ug/L Results for Sample Group: SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS METHOD 525 analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services 1-Methylnaphthalene.................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L EPTC................................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 2-Methylnapthalene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ua/L Ethofumesate........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acenaphthene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Ethyl Parathion........................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acenaphthylene......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Fluoranthene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acetochlor............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Fluorene............;.................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Alachlor............................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Hexachlorobenzene...................... < 0.1 1.00 ug/L Allethrin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Hexachlorocyclopentadiene.............. < 0.1 5.00 ug/L Anthracene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Hexachloroethane....................... < 1.0 5.00 ug/L Atrazine............................... < 0.1 3.00 ug/L Hexazinone............................. < 1.0 50.00 ug/L Azoxystrobin........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benfluralin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Iodofenphos............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L- Benzo(A)Anthracene..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Iprodione.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(B)Fluoranthene................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Isofenphos............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(GHI)Perylene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Kelthane............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(K)Fluoranthene................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Malathion.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(A)Pyrene......................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Metalaxyl.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benzophenone.......7................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Methoprene............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benzyl butyl phthalate................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Methoxychlor............................ < 0.1 50.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)adipate............... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl Parathion....................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate............. < 3.0 _ 6.00 ug/L Metolachlor............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol A............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Naled (Dibrom)......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bloc................................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Napropamide............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L iaci1............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Pendimethalin.......................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Ichlor.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Pentachlorobenzene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L . oamazepine.......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Pentachloronitrobenzene................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Carbazole.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Permethrin............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Carisoprodol........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Phenanthrene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chlordane.............................. < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Piperonyl butoxide...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chlorofenvinphos....................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prometon............................... < 0.5 50.00 uo/L Chloroxylenol.......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prometryne............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chlorpyriphos.......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Propachlor............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chrysene............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Propiconazole (Tilt)................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Cyfluthrin............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Pyrene................................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Cypermethrin........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Resmethrir < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dacthal................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Ronstar................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Deltamethrin........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Simazine............................... < 0.07 X4.00 ug/L Dibenzo(A,H)Anthracene................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Sumlthrin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dibutyl Phthalate...................... < 1.0 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dichlobenil............................ <, 0.2 50.00 ug/L Terbacil............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dichlorvos............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Triadimefon............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dieldrin............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Triclosan.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Diethyl phthalate...................... < 1.0 50.00 ug/L Trifluralin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Diethyltoluamide (DEET)................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Vinclozolin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dimethyl phthalate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Total Triazines + Metabolites (Calc)... < 0. 4.00 ug/L Dioctyl Phthalate...................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Eto£enprox............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Disulfoton sulfone..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Etofenprox alpha-CO.................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prallethrin............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: SURFACTANTS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services -- l SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Reauest No.: PR16-0376 Location: MAIN RD,SOUTH DYER LOT #1, ORIENT Sample Date: 12/01/2016 Sample Location: 5-134484T Sanitarian: KRAKOWSKI Treatment: NONE Field No.: 704-847-16-12-01 ?s: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. ali.nity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or action level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE __- Results for Sample Group: VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk. County Department of Health Services - Chlorod;fluoromethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorobenzene.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethylbenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloroethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L o-Xylene............................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromomethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L m 5 p-Xylene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloromethane.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Total Xylenes.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Vinyl Chloride......................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methylene Chloride..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Diethyl Ether.......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Acrylonitrile.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L trans 1,2 Dichloroethene............... < 0.5 5.00 ua/L Ethyl N,ethacrylate..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chloroform............................. < 0.5 B0.00 ug/L 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/T- 1,2 g/L1.2 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,1 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichlorobenzene (o)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Tetrachloride................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (m)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1-Bromo-2-Chloroethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (p)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Diethylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichloroethene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4,5 Tetramethylbenzene............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Bromo-l-Chloropropane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromoform.............................. < 0.5 80.00 ug/L Ethenylbenzene (Styrene)............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrachloroethene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isopropylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Prooylbenzene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Freon 113.............................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L tert-Butylbenzene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dibromomethane......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L sec-Butylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Isopropyltoluene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Isothiocyanate.................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L n-Butylbenzene......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Disulfide....................... <, 0.5 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Methacrylate.................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether (MTBE)......... < 0.5 10.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Naphthalene............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Bromodichloronethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobutane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ua/L Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Sulfide......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,3-Dxchloropropene................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dimethyldisulfide...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L -.is-1,3-Dichloropropene.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromobenzene.!......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,2 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Butanone (MEK)....................... < 20. 50.00 ug/L 1,1,1,2 Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran...;..................... = 24. 50.00 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Allvl chloride......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Tri.chloropropane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methacrylonitrile...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L d-Limonene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,3 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Propanal............................... < 15. 50.00 ug/L Bromochloromethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isobutane.............................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L Benzene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Butane............................... < 2. 50.00 ug/L Toluene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 'SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requester Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0376 ��t- Q�'rr^ �h f� LkAl�` Location: MAIN RD,SOUTH DYER LOT 01, ORIENT Sample Date: 03/08/2017 J Sample Location: S-134484T Sanitarian: KRAKOWSKI Treatment: NONE Field No.: 275-847-17-03-08 as: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. alinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or action level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shoo-in below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL Results for Sample Group: VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services =---------=---====__ Chlorodifluoromethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorobenzene.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethylbenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloroethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L o-Xylene............................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromomethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L m 6 p-Xylene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloromethane.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Total Xylenes.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Vinyl Chloride......................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methylene Chloride..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Diethyl Ether.......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Acrylonitrile.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L trans 1,2 Dichloroethene............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethyl Methacrylate..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chloroform............................. < 0.5 80.00 ua/L 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,1 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichlorobenzene (o)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Tetrachloride................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (m)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1-Bromo-2-Chloroethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (p)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Di.chloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Diethylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichloroethene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4,5 Tetramethylbenzene............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorod.ibromomethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Bromo-l-Chloropropane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromoform.............................. < 0.5 60.00 uc/L Ethenvlbenzene (Styrene)............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrachloroethene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isopropylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Propylbenzene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Freon 113.............................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L tert-Butylbenzene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L D.ibromomethane......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L sec-Butylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloropropene....................'< 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Isopropyltoluene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Isothiocyanate.................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L n-Butylbenzene......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Disulfide....................... < 0.5 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Methacrylate.................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl-Tent-Butyl-Ether (MTBE)......... < 0.5 10.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Naphthalene............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Bromodichloromethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobutane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 9 q Dichloropropene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Sulfide......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L -1,3-Dichloropropene................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dimethyldisulfide...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L ns-1,3-Dichloropropene.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromobenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L :,i,2 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Butanone (MEK)....................... < 20. 50.00 ug/L 1,1,1,2 Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran........................ < 20. 50.00 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Allyl chloride......................... < 0:5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichloropropane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methacrylonitrile...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L d-Limonene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,3 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Propanal............................... < 15. 50.00 ug/L Bromochloromethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isobutane.............................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L Benzene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Butane............................... < 2. 50.00 ug/L Toluene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L !I r 1 i` SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0377 LocatYSn: MAIN ROAD, ORIENT C)"I Sample Date: 11/30/2016 djk Sample Location: S-134469 KITCHEN TAP Sanitarian: KRAKOWSKI , Treatment: NONE Field No.: 700-847=16-11-30 es: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. alinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or action level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL Results for Sample Group: ALDICARB PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Total Aldicarb (calc).................. < 0.0 ug/L Carbaryl..............................._<= 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb............................... < 0.5 3.00 ug/L 1-Naphthol............................. < 0.5 50.00 uc/L'""-- Aldicarb-Sulfoxide..................... < 0.5 4.00 ug/L Methomyl............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfone....................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L Propoxur (Baygon)...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Carbofuran............................. < 0.5 40.00 ug/L Methiocarb............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 3-Hydroxycarbofuran.................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methiocarb sulfone..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Oxamyl................................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: BACTERIOLOGICAL analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services -=------___-=___ TColi.................................. < ABSENT ABSENT EColi.................................. < ABSENT ABSENT Results for Sample Group: CHLORINATED PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services alpha-BHC.............................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 4,4-DDD................................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L beta-BHC............................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 4,4-DDT................................ < 0.2 5.00 ug/L aamma-BHC (Lindane).................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Endrin................................. < 0.01 2.00 ug/L delta-BHC.............................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Chlordane.............................. < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor............................. < 0.04 0.40 ug/L Alachlor............................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor epoxide..................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Methoxychlor........................... < 0.1 40.00 ug/L Aldrin................................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Endosulfan II.......................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Dieldrin............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L' Endosulfan I........................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromoethane...................... < 0.01 0.05 ug/L Dacthal................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromo-3-chloroprooane............ < 0.02 0.20 ug/L 4,4-DDE................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: DACTHAL PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services =_=---______ Monomethyltetiachloroterephthalate..... < 5. 50.00 ug/L Tetrachloroterephthalic acid........... < 5. 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: DIOXANE analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services 1,4-Dioxane............................ < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: HERBICIDE METABOLITES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services alkylatrazine (G-28273)............ < 0.8 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L opropylatrazine (G-28279).......... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron............................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L --thylatrazine (G-30033)............. < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Caffeine............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Imidacloprid........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dinoseb................................ < 0.3 7.00 ug/L Imidacloprid Urea...................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol A............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Alachlor OA (Oxanilic Acid)............ < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Diuron................................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Alachlor ESA (Sulfonic Acid)........... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Phenytoin (Dilantin)................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-37735)..... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 4-Hydroxyphenytoin..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor OA (CGA-51202)............. < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Diethyltoluamide (DEET)................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor ESA (CGA-354743)........... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Acetaminophen.......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-41638)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol B............................ < 0.2 1,50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-40172)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Estrone................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-67125)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L 17 alpha Ethynylestradiol.............. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 2-HydroxyAtrazine (G-34048)............ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Diethylstilbestrol..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Malaoxon............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 17 beta Estradiol...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Trichlorfon............................ < 0.3 50.00 'ug/L 4-Androstene-3,17-dione................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Siduron................................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Picaridin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dichlorvos............................. < 0.6 50.00 ug/L Propachlor ESA......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Propamocarb hydrochloride.............. < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Propachlor OA.......................... < 0.3 5.00 ug/L 2,6-Dichlorobenzamide.................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Testosterone........................... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Ibuprofen.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Equilin................................ < 0.7 50.00 ug/L Gemfibrozil............................ < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Estriol................................ < 0.7 50.00 ug/L Metalaxyl.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: METALS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Lithium................................ = 1.91 ug/L Cadmium (Cd)........................... < 1. 5.00 ug/L Beryllium (Be)......................... < 0.2 4.00 ug/L Tin.................................... < 0.5 ug/L Aluminum (Al).......................... < 5. ug/L Antimony (Sb).......................... < 0.2 6.00 ug/L Titanium (Ti).......................... < 1. ug/L Tellurium.......................:...._. < 0.5 ug/L Vanadium (V)........................... < 1. ug/L Barium (Ba)............................ = 28. 2000.00 ug/L Chromium (Cr).......................... < 1. 100.00 ug/L Mercury (Hg)........................... < 0.3 2.00 ug/L Manganese (Mn)......................... = 0.002 0.30 mg/L Thallium (Tl).......................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Cobalt (Co)............................ < 1. ug/L Lead (Pb)............................ 1. 15.00 ug/L Nickel (Ni)............................ = 1.3 100.00 ug/L Thorium (Th)........................... < 2. ug/L Copper (Cu)............................ = 84. 1300.00 ug/L Uranium................................ < 0.5 30.00 ug/L Zinc (Zn).............................. < 5. 5000.00 ug/L Calcium................................ = 11.6 mg/L Germanium.............................. < 2.5 ug/L Iron (Fe).............................. < 0.1 0.30 mg/L Arsenic (As)........................... < 1. 10.00 ug/L Iron + Manganese (Combined, Calc)...... _ 6-002 0.50 mg/L nium (Se).......................... < 1. 50.00 ug/L Potassium.............................. 1.7 mg/L ntium.............................. = 91.1 ug/L Magnesium.............................. = 7.3 mg/L ... bdenum (Mo)........................ < 1. ug/L Sodium (Na)............................ = 25.3 mg/L Silver A < 2.5 100.00 ug/L RESULTS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.... SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request DNo.: PR16-0377 : 11/30/2016 Location: MAIN ROAD, ORIENTSample Sample Location: S-134469 KITCHEN TAP Sanitarian: KRAKOWSKI Treatment: NONE Field No.: 700-847-16-11-30 es: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per later; ug/L = micrograms per liter. alinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. 'X' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or action level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. 'Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE ----= Results for Sample Group: RADIOLOGICAL analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services ==___-------- Gross alpha............................ < 1.0 15.00 pCi/L Trifium................................ < 200. 20000 pCi/L Gross beta............................. = 1.6 50.00 pCi/L _== Results for Sample Group: STANDARD INORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health ervices =- ' SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0377 Locate-Dn: MAIN ROAD, ORIENT Sample Date: 11/30/2016 Sample Location: S-134469 KITCHEN TAP Sanitarian: KRAKOWSKI Treatment: NONE Field No.: 700-847-16-11-30 s: !<1 symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. linity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or ,..mon level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is- a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE =_- Results for Sample Group: VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Chlorodifluoromethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorobenzene.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethylbenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloroethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ua/L o-Xylene............................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromomethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L m S p-Xylene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloromethane.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Total Xylenes.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Vinyl Chloride......................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methylene Chloride..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Diethyl Ether.......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Acrylonitrile.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L trans 1,2 Dichloroethene............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethyl Methacrylate..................... < 01.5 50.00 ug/L Chloroform............................. < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,1 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichlorobenzene (o)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Tetrachloride................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (m)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1-Bromo-2-Chloroethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (p)................ < 0.5 5.00 ue/L 1,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Diethylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichloroethene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4,5 Tetramethylbenzene............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ua/L 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Bromo-l-Chloropropane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromoform.............................. < 0.5 80.00 ug/L Ethenylbenzene (Styrene)............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrachloroethene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isopropylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Propylbenzene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Freon 113.............................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L text-Butylbenzene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dibromomethane......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L sec-Butylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Isopropyltoluene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Isothiocyanate.................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L n-Butylbenzene......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Disulfide....................... < 0.5 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Methacrylate.................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether (MTBE)......... < 0.5 10.00 ug/L 1,1 Dxchloroethene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Naphthalene............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Bromodichloromethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobutane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L ..... < 0.5 5.00 u /L Methyl Sulfide......................... < 0.5 50.00 u Dichloropropene............... /L g y 9 11,3-Dichloropropene................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dimethyldisulfide...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L d1s-1,3-Dichloropropene.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromobenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,2 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Butanone (MBK)....................... < 20. 50.00 ug/L 1,1,1,2 Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran........................ < 20: 50.00 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Allyl chloride......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichloropropane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methacrylonitrile...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L d-Limonene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,3 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Propanal............................... < 15. 50.00 ug/L Bromochloromethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isobutane.............................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L Benzene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Butane............................... < 2. 50.00 ug/L Toluene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L V !O �1dr SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS 1J/! Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0378 Location: MAIN RD., ORIENT Sample Date:_2/01_/2016 Sample Loca loon: 7S117469T ([f�J�a �o�� Sanitarian: ZCRAKOWSKI (!3:a Treatment: NONE Field No.: 705-847-16-12-01 as: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. ilinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or ..._on level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL Results for Sample Group: ALDICARB PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services -__----------=__ Total Aldicarb (Calc).................. < 0.0 ug/L Carbaryl.. ............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb............................... < 0.5 3.00 ug/L 1-Naphthol............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfoxide..................... < 0.5 4.00 ug/L Methomyl............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfone....................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L Propoxur (Baygon)...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Carbofuran............................. < 0.5 40.00 ug/L. Methiocarb............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 3-Hydroxycarbofuran.................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methiocarb sulfone..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Oxamyl................................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: CHLORINATED PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services alpha-BHC.............................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 4,4-DDD................................ < 0.2 5.00 ug/L beta-BHC............................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 4,4-DDT................................ < 0.2 5.00 ug/L r gamma-BHC-(Lindane)'.................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Endrin................................. < 0.01 2.00 ug/L delta-BHC.............................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Chlordane.............................. < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor.............................. < 0.04 0.40 ug/L Alachlor............................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor epoxide..................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Methoxychlor........................... < 0.1 40.00 ug/L Aldrin................................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Endosulfan II.....................,.... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Dieldrin............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan I........................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromoethane...................... < 0.01 0.05 ug/L Dacthal................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane............ < 0.02 0.20 ug/L 4,4-DDE................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L ---_= Results for Sample Group: DACTHAL PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Pionomethyltetrachloroterephthalate..... < 5. 50.00 ug/L Tetrachloroterephthalic acid........... < 5. 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: DIOXANE analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services 1,4-Dioxane............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: HERBICIDE METABOLITES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Didealkylatrazine (G-28273)............ < 0.8 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Deisopropylatrazine (G-28279).......... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron............................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Desethylatrazine (G-30033)............. < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Caffeine............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L acloprid........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dinoseb................................. < 0.3 7.00 ug/L lacloprid Urea...................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol A............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L hlor OA (Oxanilic Acid)............ < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Diuron................................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Alachlor ESA (Sulfonic Acid)........... = 0.3 50.00 ug/L Phenytoin (Dilantin)................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-37735)..... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 4-Hydroxyphenytoin..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor OA (CGA-51202)............. = 4.8 50.00 ug/L Diethyltoluamide (DEET)................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor ESA (CGA-354743)............ = 12.3 50.00 ug/L Acetaminophen.......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-41638)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol B............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-40172)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Estrone................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-67125)...._ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L 17 alpha Ethynylestradiol.............. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 2-HydroxyAtrazine (G-34048)............ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Diethylstilbestrol......................< 0.5 50.00 ug/L Malaoxon............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 17 beta Estradiol...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Trichlorfon............................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L 9 Androstene-3,17-drone................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Siduron................................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Picaridin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dichlorvos............................. < 0.6 50.00 ug/L Propachlor ESA.......................... = 0.7 50.00 ug/L Propamocarb hydrochloride.............. < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Propachlor OA.......................... < 0.3 5.00 ug/L 2,6-Dichlorobenzamide.................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Testosterone........................... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Ibuprofen.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Equilin................................ < 0.7 50.00 ug/L Gemfibrozil............................ < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Estriol................................ < 0.7 50.00 ug/L Metalaxyl.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: METALS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Lithium................................ < 1. ug/L Cadmium (Cd)........................... < 1. 5.00 ug/L Beryllium (Be)......................... < 0.2 4.00 ug/L Tin.................................... < 0.5 ug/L Aluminum (Al).......................... = 6. ug/L Antimony (Sb).......................... < 0.2 6.00 ug/L Titanium (Ti).......................... < 1. ug/L Tellurium.............................. < 0.5 ug/L Vanadium (V)........................... < 1. ug/L Barium (Ba)............................ = 17. 2000.00 ug/L Chromium (Cr).......................... < 1. 100.00 ug/L Mercury (Hg).........................,. < 0.3 2.00 ug/L Manganese (Mn)......................... = 0.007 0.30 mg/L Thallium (Tl).......................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Cobalt (Co)............................ < 1. - ug/L Lead (Pb).............................. < 1. 15.00 ug/L Nickel (Ni)............................ = 1.0 100.00 ug/L Thorium (Th)........................... < 2. ug/L Copper (Cu)............................ < 5. 1300.00 ug/L Uranium................................ < 0.5 30.00 ug/L Zinc (Zn).............................. < 5. 5000.00 ug/L Calcium................................ = 25.0 mg/L Germanium.............................. < 2.5 ug/L Iron (F_a).............................. = 0.32 0.30 mg/L Arsenic (As)........................... < 1. 10.00 ug/L Iron + Manganese (Combined, Calc)...... = 0.327 0.50 mg/L Selenium (Se).......................... < 1. 50.00 ug/L Potassium.............................. = 1.7 mg/L Strontium.............................. = 119. ug/L Magnesium.............................. = 6.9 mg/L Molybdenum (Mo)........................ < 1. ug/L Sodium (Na)............................ - 11.6 mg/L -ver (Ag)............................ < 2.5 100.00 ug/L _= Results for Sample Group: RADIOLOGICAL analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Gross alpha............................ < 1.0 15.00 pCi/L Tritium................................ < 200. 20000 pCi/L Gross beta............................. = 1.9 50.00 pCi/L RESULTS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.... SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0378 Location: MAIN RD., ORIENT Sample Date: 12/01/2016 Sample Location: S117469T Sanitarian: KRAKOWSKI Treatment: NONE Field No.: 705-847-16-12-01 :s: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. lenity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or action level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE ==== Results for Sample Group: STANDARD INORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services pH-Lab................................. = 6.5 N/A Nitrate................................ = 6.5 10.00 mg/L Specific Conductivity-Lab.............. = 280. umho/u cm Bromide................................ < 0.05 -mg/L Chloride (Cl).......................... = 19. 250.00 mg/L Orthophosphate......................... < 0.5 mg/L Sulfate (SOO.......................... = 50. 250.00 mg/L Fluoride............................... < 0.2 2.20 mg/L Ammonia (NH3-N)........................ < 0.5 mg/L T. Alkalinity.......................... = 22. mg/L Nitrite (NO2-N)........................ < 0.1 1.00 mg/L Hexavalent Chromium.................... = 0.06 ug/L Results for Sample Group: SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS METHOD 525 analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services -- SUE70LK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requester Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0378 Ln,catlon: MAIN RD., ORIENT Sample Date: 12/01/2016 Sample Location: S117469T Sanitarian: KRAKOWSKI Treatment: NONE Field No.: 705-847-16-12-01 s: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. linity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. - symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or dccion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted should not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE -- Results for Sample Group: VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Chlorodifluoromethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorobenzene.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethylbenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloroethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L o-Xylene............................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromomethane............................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L m 6 p-Xylene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloromethane.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Total Xylenes.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Vinyl Chloride......................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methylene Chloride..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Diethyl Ether.......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Acrylonitrile.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L trans 1,2 Dichloroethene............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethyl Methacrylate..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chloroform............................. < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene.........I....... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,1 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichlorobenzene (o)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Tetrachloride................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (m)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1-Bromo-2-Chloroethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (p)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Diethylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichloroethene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4,5 Tetramethylbenzene............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Bromo-l-Chloropropane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromoform.............................. < 0.5 80.00 ug/L Ethenylbenzene (Styrene)............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrachloroethene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isopropylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Propylbenzene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Freon 113.............................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L tert-Butylbenzene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dibromomethane......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L sec-Butylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Isopropyltoluene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Isothiocyanate.................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L n-Butylbenzene......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Disulfide....................... < 0.5 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Methacrylate.................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether (MTBE)......... < 0.5 10.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Naphthalene............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Bromodichloromethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobutane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Sulfide......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,3-Dichloropropene................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dimethyldisulfide...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L ___�s-1,3-Dichloropropene.............. < 0.5- 5.00 ug/L Bromobenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,2 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Butanone (MEK)....................... < 20. 50.00 ug/L 1,1,1,2 Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 uo/L Tetrahydrofuran........................ < 20. 50.00 ua/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Allyl chloride......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichloropropane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methacrylonitrile...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L d-Limonene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,3 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Propanal............................... < 15. 50.00 ug/L Bromochloromethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isobutane.............................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L Benzene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Butane............................... < 2. 50.00 ug/L Toluene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L t Felt6.0 or 7-e-5157 911% COUNTY OF SUFFOLK SCUD STEVEN BELLONE SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES JAMES L.TOMARKEN,MD,MPH,MBA,MSW Commissioner February 20,2018 Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company PO Box 86 Orient,NY 11957 Attn: Carol-Tuthill Re: 'Tuthill Oysteronds H.C.-Test Wells Private `�6'el�#- _ )Lot�';lLgcation IEIDRe Tax_Map# Sample Re •uest#: _ _ _ ]Date PR16-0376 S-134786T South Dyer Lot 42 S10-16-0007 1000-17-6-14.2 10/5/17 i PR16-0378 S-134787T South Dyer Lot 44 S10-16-0007 1000-17-6-14.2 10/5/17 Dear Ms.Tuthill, The above referenced wells have been sampled and the complete water analysis is enclosed for your review. At the time of the initial sampling, nl rpt awe le els etthsuffalkutestelPsfandard6=0rg�L�,and 'were.be�he-MAa*i mu m=@ontarrrimant-Level-(MGL)-afa]-0.mga.��r Snu h vPr=I.QL92-(-S�479,6-T+- 'Addlt=iomally traceAeve'fs-af-som-e p ieide-eornpounds=were-detected-witltinr�drink-ing r staTldar Sin`-t4M—f South-Byer-Loto(X13+7-&&Tta M-S' ugirDyer=L=ur#4-&-144'k8�T-)-Please-se&themlab=resrrhs-rrrtder herbicide r'tretallt so�tlreit�levetsAll other results met NYSDOH Drinking Water Standards and SCDHS test well standards. A copy of the completed analysis is being forwarded to Ms. Michelle Ersbak at our Office of Wastewater Management located at 360 Yaphank Avenue, Suite 2C,Yaphank. If you have any questions concerning these water sample results,feel free to contact this office. Be sure to have your Private Request#available when making inquiries to this office concerning these water samples. Sincerely, L .Z, Anthony J. Condos Public Health Sanitarian Bureau of Drinking Water cc: Michelle Ersbak- SCDHS OWM Carol Tuthill Condon Engineering PC _ a ' OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES- .,. 4 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY-360 YAPHANK AVENUE,SUITE 1C-YAPHANK,NY 11980 Publicl�ea ith PHONE. (631)852-5810-FAX. (631)852-5787 i SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Reauestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0376 Location: SOUTH DYER, ORIENT Sample Date: Sample Location: S-134786T LOT #2 Sanitarian: ABAZIS Treatment: NONE Field No.: 230-929-17-10-05 Notes: '<' symbol means "less than." indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. alinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or ion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted _._-sld not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL Results for Sample Group: ALDICARB PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Total Pldicarb (calc).................. < 0.0 ug/L Carbaryl............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb............................... < 0.5 3.00 ug/L 1-Naphthol....................... ..... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfoxide..................... < 0.5 4.00 ug/L Methomyl............................... < 0.5 50 00 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfone....................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L Propoxur (Baygon)...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Carbofuran............................. < 0.5 40.00 ug/L Methiocarb............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 3-Hydroxycarbofuran.................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methiocarb sulfone..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Oxamyl................................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: CHLORINATED PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services alpha-BHC.............................. < 0.2 _ 5.00 ug/L 4,4-DDD. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L beta-BHC............................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 4,4-DDT................................ < 0.2 5.00 ug/L gamma-BHC (Lindane).................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Endrin................................. < 0.01 2.00 ug/L delta-BHC.............................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Chlordane.............................. < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor............................. < 0.04 0.40 ug/L Alachlor............................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor epoxide..................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Methoxychlor........................... < 0.1 40.00 ug/L Aldrin................................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Endosulfan II.......................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Dieldrin............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan I................ .......... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromoethane...................... < 0.01 0.05 ug/L Dacthal................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane............ < 0.02 0.20 ug/L 4,4-DDE................................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: DACTHAL PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Monomethyltetrachloroterephthalate..... < 5. 50.00 ug/L Tetrachloroterephthalic acid........... < S. 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: DIOXANE analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services 1,4-Dioxane............................ < 0.1 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: HERBICIDE METABOLITES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services ==-- ________ Didealkylatrazine (G-28273)............ < 0.8 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Deisopropylatrazine (G-28279).......... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron............................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Desethylatrazine (G-30033)............. < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Caffeine............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Imidacloprid...................:....... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dinoseb................................ < 0.3 7.00 ug/L '9acloprid Urea...................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol A............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L chlor OA (Oxanilic Acid)............ < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Diuron................................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L chlor ESA (Sulfonic Acid)........... = 0.3 50.00 ug/L Phenytoin (Dilantin)................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-37735)..... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 4-Hydroxyphenytoin..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor OA (CGA-51202)............. = 1.1 50.00 ua/L Diethyltoluamide (DEET)................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor ESA (CGA-354743)........... = 3.1 50.00 ug/L Acetaminophen.......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-41638)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol B............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-40172)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Estrone................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-67125)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L 17 alpha Ethynylestradiol.............. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 2-HydroxyAtrazine (G-34048)............ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Diethylstilbestrol..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Malaoxon............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 17 beta Estradiol...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Trichlorfon............................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L 4-Androstene-3,17-drone................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Siduron................................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Picaridin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dichlorvos............................. < 0.6 50.00 ug/L Propachlor ESA......................... = 0.3 50.00 ug/L Propamocarb hydrochloride.............. < 0.3 50.OD ug/L Propachlor OP_.......................... < 0.3 5.00 ug/L 2,6-Dichlorobenzamide.................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Testosterone........................... < 0:3 50.00 ug/L Ibuprofen.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Equilin................................ < 0.7 50.00 ug/L Gemfibrozil............................ < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Estriol................................ < 0.7 50.00 ug/L Metalaxyl.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L, _-_ Results for Sample Group: METALS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Lithium................................ < 1, ug/L Cadmium (Cd)........................... < 1. 5.00 ug/L Beryllium (Be)......................... < 0.2 4.00 ug/L Tin.................................... < 0.5 ug/L Aluminum (Al).......................... < 5. ug/L Antimony (Sb).......................... < 0.2 6.00 ug/L Titanium (Ti).......................... < 1. ug/L Tellurium.............................. < 0.5 ug/L Vanadium (V)........................... < 1. ug/L Barium (Ba)............................ = 23. 2000.00 ug/L Chromium (Cr).......................... < 1. 100.00 ug/L Mercury (Hg)........................... < 0.3 2.00 ug/L Manganese (Mn)......................... = 0.001 0.30 mg/L Thallium (TI).......................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Cobalt (Co)............................ < 1. ug/L Lead (Pb).............................. < 1. 15.00 ug/L Nickel (Ni)............................ = 0.3 100.00 ug/L Thorium (Th)........................... < 2. ug/L Copper (Cu)............................ < 5. 1300.00 ug/L Uranium................................ < 0.5 30.00 ug/L Zinc (Zn).............................. < 5. 5000.00 ug/L Calcium................................ = 13.8 mg/L Germanium.............................. < 2.5 ug/L Iron (Fe).............................. < 0.1 0.30 mg/L Arsenic (As)........................... < 1. 10.00 ug/T, Iron + Manganese (Combined, Calc)...... = 0.001 0.50 mg/L Selenium (Se).......................... < 1. 50.00 ug/L Potassium.............................. = 2.1 mg/L Strontium.............................. = 130. ug/L Magnesium.............................. = 8.0 mg/L Molybdenum (Mo)........................ < 1. ug/L Sodium (Na)............................ = 59.5 mg/L Silver (Ag)............................ < 2.5 100.00 ug/L _= Results for Sample Group: RADIOLOGICAL analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services )ss alpha............................ < 1. 15.00 pCi/L Tritium................................ < 200. 20000 pCi/L Gross beta............................. = 1.5 50.00 pCi/L RESULTS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.... 1 • TI SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS w Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0376 Location: SOUTH DYER, ORIENT Sample Date: 10/05/2017 Sample Location: S-134786T LOT 42 Sanitarian: ABAZIS Treatment: NONE Field No.: 230-929-17-10-05 Notes: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. -"salinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. *' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or ,ion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted )uld not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE =_=_= Results for Sample Group: STANDARD INORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services pH-Lab................................. = 6.8 NIP. Bromide................................ = 0.071 mg/L Specific Conductivity-Lab.............. = 454. umho/0 cm Orthophosphate......................... < 0.1 mg/L Chloride (Cl).......................... = 96. 250.00 mg/L Fluoride............................... < 0.1 2.20 mg/L Sulfate (SO4).....................4.... = 15. 250.00 mg/L T. Alkalinity...........:.......I... _.. = 36. mg/L Ammonia (NH3-N)........................ < 0.5 mg/L Hexavalent Chromium..................... = 0.11 ug/L Nitrite (1,102-N)........................ < 0.05 1.00 mg/L Chlorate............................... < 0.05 mg/L Nitrate................................ = 6.0 10.00 mg/L Results for Sample Group: SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS METHOD 525 analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services 1-Methylnaphthalene.................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L EPTC................................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 2-Methylnapthalene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Ethofumesate........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acenaphthene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Ethyl Parathion........................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acenaphthylene......................... < 0.2 50.00 ua/L Fluoranthene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acetochlor............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Fluorene............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Alachlor............................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L P.exachlorobenzene...................... < 0.1 1.00 ug/L Allethrin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Hexachlorocyclopentadiene.............. < 0.1 5.00 ug/L" Anthracene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Hexachlorcethane....................... < 1. 5.00 ug/L Atrazine............................... < 0.1 3.00 ug/L Hexazinone............................. < 1. 50.00 ug/L Azoxystrobin........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benfluralin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Iodofenphos............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benzo(A)Anthracene..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Iprodione.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(B)Fluoranthene................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Isofenphos............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(GHI)Perylene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Kelthane............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(K)Fluoranthene................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Malathion.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(A)Pyrene......................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Metalaxyl.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benzophenone........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Methoprene............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benzyl butyl phthalate................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Methoxvchlor........................... < 0.1 50.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)adipate............... < 0.5 59.00 uo/L Methyl Parathion....................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bis(2-etbylhexyl)phthalate............. < 3. 6.00 ug/L Metolachlor............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bisvhenol A.......................... . < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Naled (Dibrom).........4............... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bloc................................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Napropamide............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L A,nmacil...4........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Pendimethalin.......................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L achlor.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Pentachlorobenzene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L bamazepine.......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Pentachloronitrobenzene................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L carbazole.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Permethrin............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Carisoprodol........................... < 0.5 50.00 ua/L Phenanthrene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chlordane.............................. < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Piperonyl butoxide..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chlorofenvinphos....................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prometon............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chloroxylenol.......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prometryne............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chlorpyriphos..........4............... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Propachlor............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chrysene............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Propiconazole (Tilt)................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Cvfluthrin............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Pyrene................................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Cypermethrin........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Resmethrin............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dacthal................................ < 0.2 50.00 ua/L Ronstar................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Deltamethrin........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Simazine............................... < 0.07 4.00 ug/L Dibenzo(A,H)Anthracene................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Sumithrin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dibutyl Phthalate...................... < 1. 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dichlobenil............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Terbacil............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dichlorvos............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Triadimefon............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dieldrin............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Triclosan.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Diethyl phthalate...................... < 1. 50.00 ug/L Trifluralin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Diethyltoluamide (DEET)................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Vinclozolin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dimethyl phthalate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Total Triazi-nes + Metabolites (Calc)... < 0. 4.00 ug/L Dioctyl Phthalate...................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Etofenprox............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Disulfoton sulfone..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Etofenprox alpha-CO.................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prallethrin............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L == Results for Sample Group: SURFACTANTS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services MBAs (LAS,MW=348.47).................... < 0.1 mg/L i RESULTS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.... J SUFb'OLK (.UUNlz ULVAKAM.NL Uk eirrwiH baxvi"a - WAIZH ANA1.=oi� Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0376 Location: SOUTH DYER, ORIENT Sample Date: 10/05/2017 _ Sample Location: S-134786T LOT 42 Sanitarian: ABAZIS Treatment: NONE Field No.: 230-929-17-10-05 Notes: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. Alkalinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. - symbol means level foune exceeas the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or ion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted uld not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL',s not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE =-== Results for Sample Group: VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Chlorodifluoromethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorobenzene.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Drchlorodi.fluoromethane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethylbenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloroethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L o-Xvlene............................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromomethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L m & p-Xylene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloromethane.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Total Xylenes.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Vinyl Chloride......................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methylene Chloride..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Diethyl Ether.......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,1 D.ichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Acrylonitrile......... ................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L trans 1,2 Dichlorcethene............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethyl N,ethacrylate..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chloroform............................. < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,1 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichlorobenzene (o)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Tetrachloride................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (m)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1-Bromo-2-Chloroethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (p)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloropropane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Diethylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichloroethene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ua/L 1,2,4,5 Tetramethylbenzene........._... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Tri.chlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Bromo-l-Chloropropane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromoform.............................. < 0.5 80.00 ug/L Ethenylbenzene (Styrene)............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrachloroethene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isopropylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Propylbenzene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Freon 113...................... ....... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L tert-Butylbenzene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dibromomethane......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L sec-Butylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Isopropyltoluene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Isothiocyanate.................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L n-Butylbenzene........... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Disulfide....................... < 0.5 ua/L Hexachlorobutadiene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Methacrylate.................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl-Tera-Butyl-Ether (N,TBE)......... < 0.5 10.00 ug/L 1,1 Dlchloroethene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Naphthalene............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Bromodichloromethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobutane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2,3 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Sulfide......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L cis-1,3-Dichloropropene................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dimethyld_sulfide...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L is-1,3-Dichloropropene.............. < 0.5 5.00 ua/L Bromobenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L ,2 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Butanone (MEK)....................... < 20. 50.00 ug/L __ ,1,2 Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran........................ < 20. 50.00 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Allyl cnloride......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichloropropane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methacrylonitrile...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L d-Llmonene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,3 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Propanal............................... < 15. 50.00 ug/L Bromochloromethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isobutane.............................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L Benzene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Butane............................... < 2. 50.00 ug/L Toluene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L a n SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Reauestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0378 Location: SOUTH DYER, ORIENT Sample Date• 10/0-5/2017 Sample Location: S-134787T LOT n4 Sanitarian: ABAZIS Treatment: NONE Field No.: 231-929-17-10-05 Notes: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. alkalinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or ction level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted hould not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL Results for Sample Group: ALDICARB PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Total Aldicarb (talc).................. < 0.0 ug/L Carbaryl............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb............................... < 0.5 3.00 ug/L 1-Naphthol.......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Aldicarb-Sulfoxide..................... < 0.5 4.00 ua/L Methomyl.......... < 0.5 50.00 ua/L Aldicarb-Sulfone....................... < 0.5 2.00 ug-/L Pronoxur (Baygon)...................... < 0.5 00.00 /L' Carbofuran............................. < 0.5 40.00 ug/L Methiocarb............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 3-Hydroxycarbofuran............... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methiocarb sulfone..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Oxamyl................................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L --- Results for Sample Group: CHLORINATED PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services -------_-___ --------------- alpha-BHC.............................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 4,4-DDD.......... < C.2 5.00 Lc/L ............. beta-BHC...................;........... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 4,4-DDT................................ < 0.2 5.00 uc/L gamma-BHC (Lindane).................... < 0.02 0.20 u /L Endrin................._....._......_.. < O.C1 2.00 ug/L ug /L .............................. < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Chlordane.............................. < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor............................. < 0.04 0.40 ug/L Alachlor............................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Heptachlor epoxide..................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Methoxychlor........................... < 0.1 40.00 ug/L Aldrin................................. < 0.2 5.00 ua/L Endosulfan II.......................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L Dieldrin............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug-/L Endosulfan Sulfate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan I........................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromoethane...................... < 0.01 0.05 ug/L Dacthal..............• < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane............ < 0.02 0.20 ug/L 4,4-DDE................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: DACTHAL PESTICIDES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services ---- Monomethyltetrachloroterephthalate..... < 5' 50.00 ug/L Tetrachlorotereohthalic acid........... < 5. 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: DIOXANE analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services =______------- 1,4-Dioxane............................ < 0.1 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: HERBICIDE METABOLITES analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services =---- Didealkylatrazine (G-28273)............ < 0.8 50.00 uo/L Metolachlor............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Deisopropylatrazir_e (G-28279).......... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron............................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L 0esechylatrazine (G-30033).............. .< 0.4 50.00 ug/L Caffeine............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Imidacloprid........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dinoseb................................ < 0.3 7.00 ug/L Imidacloprid Urea...................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bisohenol A............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L achlor OA (Oxanilic Acid)............ < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Diuron................................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L achlor ESA (Sulfonic Acid)........... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Pnenytoin (Dilantin)................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L -tolachlor metabolite (CGA-37735)..... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 4-Hydroxyphenytoin..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor OA (CGA-51202)............. < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Diethyltoluamide (DEET)................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor ESA (CGA-354743)........... = _ 0.4 50.00 ug/L Acetaminophen.......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-41638)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol B............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-40172)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Estrone................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Metolachlor metabolite (CGA-67125)..... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L 17 alpha Ethynylestradiol.............. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 2-Hyd_oxyAtrazine (G-34048)............ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Diethylstilbestrol..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Malaoxon............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 17 beta Estradiol...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Trichlorfon............................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L 4-Androstene-3,17-drone................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Siduron................................ < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Picaridin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dichlorvos..�........................... < 0.6 50.00 ug/L Propachlor ESA......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Propamocarb hydrochloride.............. < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Propachlor OA.......................... < 0.3 5.00 ug/L 2,6-Dichlorobenzamide.................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Testosterone........................... < 0.3 50.00 ug/L Ibuprofen.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Equilin................................ < 0.7 50.00 uy/L Gemfibrozil............................ < 0.4 50.00 ug/L Estriol................................ < 0.7 50.00 ug/L Metalaxyl.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: METALS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services --------- Lithium................................ < 1. ug/L Cadmium (Cd)........................... < 1. 5.00 ug/L Beryllium (Be)......................... < 0.2 4.00 ug/L Tin.................................... < 0.5 ug/L Aluminum (A1).......................... < 5. ug/L Antimony (Sb).......................... < 0.2 6.00 ug/L Titanium (Ti).......................... < 1. ug/L Tellurium.............................. < 0.5 ug/L Vanadium (V)........................... < 1. ug/L Barium (Ba). = 21. 2000.00 ug/L Chromium (Cr).......................... < 1. 100.00 ug/L Mercury (Hg)........................... < 0.3 2.00 ug/L Manganese (Mn)......................... < 0.001 0.30 mg/L Thallium (Tl).......................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Cobalt {Co)............................. < 1. ug/L Lead (Pb)....... 15.00 ug/L Nickel (N1)............................ < 0.2 100.00 ug/L Thorium (Th)........................... < 2. ug/L Copper (Cu)............................ < 5. 1300.00 ug/L Uranium................................ < 0.5 30.00 ug/L Zinc (Zn).............................. < 5. 5000.00 ug/L Calcium................................. = 17.6 mg/L Germanium.............................. < 2.5 ug/L Iron (Fe).............................. < 0.1 0.30 mg/L Arsenic (As)........................... < 1. 10.00 ug/L Iron + Manganese (Combined, Calc)...... < 0. 0.50 mg/L Selenium (Se).......................... < 1. 50.00 ug/L Potassium.............................. = 2.5 mg/L Strontium.............................. = 125. ug/L Magnesium.. = 8.4 mg/L Molybdenum (Mo)........................ < 1. ug/L Sodium (Na)............................ = 45.2 mg/L Silver (Ag)............................ < 2.5 100.00 ug/L Results for Sample Group: RADIOLOGICAL analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services ---- ))Ss alpha............................ < 1. 15.00 pCi/L Tritium................................ < 200. 20000 pCi/L mss beta.......... ....... = 2.3 50.00 pCi/L RESULTS CONTINUED 014 NEXT PAGE.... i -&&V... I.VUNlI LLYtfR1T1LlV1 Vr nLna.ln JLxViI.LS - WA1r.x ANALYSIS Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0378 Location: SOUTH DYER, ORIENT Sample Date: 10/05/2017 Sample Location: S-134787T LOT #4 Sanitarian: ABAZIS Treatment: NONE Field No.: 231-929-17-10-05 Notes: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. Alkalinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*, symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or :ion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted )uld not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE ===== Results for Sample Group: STANDARD INORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services pH-Lab................................. = 6.8 N/A Bromide. .......... = 0.059 _ mg/L Specific Conductivity-Lab.............. = 424. umho/0 cm Orthophosphate......................... < 0.1 ma/L Chloride (C1).......................... = 90. 250.00 mg/L Fluoride............................... < 0.1 2.20 mg/L Sulfate (SO4).......................... = 14. 250.00 mg/L T. Alkalinity.......................... = 35. mg/L Ammonia (NH3-N)........................ < 0.5 mg/L Hexavalent Chromium.................... = 0.32 ug/L Nitrite (NO2-N)........................ < 0.05 1.00 ma/L Chlorate............................... < 0.05 mg/L Nitrate................................ = 2.8 10.00 mg/L Results for Sample Group: SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS METHOD 525 analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services 1-Methylnaphthalene.................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L EPTC................................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L 2-Methylnapthalene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Ethofumesate........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acenaphthene........................... < 0.2 50.00 uo/L Ethyl Parathion........................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acenaphthylene......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Fluoranthene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Acetochlor............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Fluorene............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Alachlor............................... < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Hexachlorobenzene...................... < 0.1 1.00 ug/L Allethrin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Hexachlorocyclopentadiene.............. < 0.1 5.00 ug/L Anthracene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Hexachloroethane....................... < 1. 5.00 ug/L Atrazine............................... < 0.1 3.00 ug/L Herazinone............................. < 1. 50.00 ug/L Azoxystrobin........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benfluralin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Iodofenphos............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benzo(A)Anthracene..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Iprodione.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(B)Fluoranthene................... < 0.2 50.00 ua/L Isofenphos............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(GHI)Perylene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Kelthane............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(K)Fluoranthene................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Malathion.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Benzo(A)Pyrene......................... < 0.02 0.20 ug/L Metalaxyl.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benzophenone........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Methoprene............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Benzyl butyl phthalate................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Methoxychlor........................... < 0.1 50.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexyl)adipate............... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl Parathion....................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bis(2-ethylhexvl)phthalate............. < 3. 6.00 ug/L Metolachlor............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bisphenol A............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Naled (Dibrom)......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Bloc................................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Napropamide............................ < 0.2 50.00 uo/L Bromacil............................... < 0.5 50.00 Ug/L Pendimethalin.......................... < 0.2 5.00 ug/L achlor.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Pentachlorobenzene..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L bamazepine.......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Pentachloronitrobenzene................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L •bazole.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Permethrin............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Carisoprodol........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Phenanthrene........................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chlordane.............................. < 0.2 2.00 ug/L Piperonyl butoxide..................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chlorofenvinphos....................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prometon............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Chloroxylenol.......................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prometryne............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chlorpyriphos.......................... < •0.2 50.00 ug/L Propachlor............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Chrysene............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Propiconazole (Tilt)............,...,,, < 0.2 50.0.0 ug/L Cyfluthrin............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Pyrene............:......_............. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Cypermethrin........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Resmethrin............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dacthal................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Ronstar................................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Deltamethrin........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Simazine............................... < 0.07 4.00 ug/L Dibenzo(A,H)Anthracene................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Sumithrin.............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Dibutyl Phthalate...................... < 1. 50.00 ug/L Tebuthiuron............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dichlobenil............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Terbacil............................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dichlorvos............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Triadimefon............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dieldrin............................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Triclosan.............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Diethyl phthalate...................... < 1. 50.00 ug/L Trifluralin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Diethyltoluamide (DEET)................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Vinclozolin............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Dimethyl phthalate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Total Triazines + Metabolites (Calc)... < 0. 4.00 ug/L Dioctyl Phthalate...................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Etofenprox............................. < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Disulfoton sulfone..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Etofenprox alpha-CO.................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Endosulfan Sulfate..................... < 0.2 50.00 ug/L Prallethrin............................ < 0.2 50.00 ug/L _= Results for Sample Group: SURFACTANTS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services MEAS (LAS,MW=348.47)................... < 0.1 mg/L RESULTS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.... 1 bUlkULK CUUNTY llh11AlC1XLNT Ur' Mk.ALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Requestor Name: TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLLOW CO. LLC Request No.: PR16-0376 Location: SOUTH DYER, ORIENT Sample Date: 10/05/2017 Sample Location: S-134787T LOT 04 Sanitarian: ABAZIS Treatment: NONE Field No.: 231-929-17-10-05 Notes: '<' symbol means "less than" indicating no detection. mg/L = milligrams per liter; ug/L = micrograms per liter. Alkalinity is reported as mg/L as CaCO3. '*' symbol means level found exceeds the maximum contaminant level (MCL), or -tion level for lead and copper. Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/L. Severely restricted could not exceed 20 mg/L. The MCL for nickel is a proposed limit. Any MCL's not shown below have not been established. Result MCL Result MCL RESULTS CONTINUED FROM PRECEDING PAGE _==== Results for Sample Group: VOLATILE ORGANICS analyzed by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Chlorodifluoromethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorobenzene.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethylbenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloroethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L o-Xylene............................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromomethane........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L m 6 p-Xylene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chloromethane............ ............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Total Xylenes.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Vinyl Chloride......................... < 0.5 2.00 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methylene Chloride..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Diethyl Ether.......................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Acrylonitrile.......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L trans 1,2 Dichloroethene............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Ethyl Methacrylate..................... < 0.5 50.00 ua/L Chloroform............................. < 0.5 60.00 ug/L 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ua/L 1,2 Dichloroethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1,1 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichlorobenzene (o)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Tetrachloride................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (m)...........:.... < 0.5 5.00 ua/L 1-Bromo-2-Chloroethane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (p)................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2 Dichloroprooane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Diethylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Trichloroethene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,4,5 Tetramethylbenzene............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Bromo-l-Chloropropane................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichlorobenzene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromo£orm.............................. < 0.5 80.00 ug/L Ethenylbenzene (Styrene)............... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrachloroethene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isopropylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Propylbenzene........................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Freon 113.............................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L tert-Butylbenzene...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Dibromomethane......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 6ec-Butylbenzene....................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L p-Isopropyltoluene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Isothiocyanate.................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L n-Butylbenzene......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Carbon Disulfide....................... < 0.5 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Methacrylate....... ............ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether (MTBE)......... < 0.5 10.00 ug/L 1,1 Dichloroethene..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Naphthalene............................ < 0.5 50.00 ug/L Bromodichloromethane................... < 0.5 80.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobutane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2,3 Dichloropropene.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methyl Sulfide........................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L cis-1,3-Dichloropropene................ < 0.5 5.00 uc/L Dimethyldisulflde...................... < 0.5 50.00 ug/L "-1•cans-1,3-Dichloropropene.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Bromobenzene........................... < 0.5 5.00 ugJL X1,2 Trichloroethane.................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2-Butanone (MEK) ....................... < 20. 50.00 ug/L ,'1,1,2 Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Tetrahydrofuran........................ < 20. 50.00 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane.............. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Allyl chloride......................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 1,2,3 Trichloropropane................. < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Methacrylonitrile...................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L 2,2 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L d-Limonene............................. < 0.5 50.00 ug/L 1,3 Dichloropropane.................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Propanal............................... < 15. 50.00 ug/L Bromochloromethane..................... < 0.5 5.00 ug/L Isobutane.............................. < 2. 50.00 ug/L Benzene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L n-Butane............................... < 2. 50.00 ug/L Toluene................................ < 0.5 5.00 ug/L CASOF L DRILLERS SuffolkS10-16-0003 I County BOi-1 WPCC S-134480T Owner Invoice#Job# Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Co 116714 Address PO Box 86 Orient, NY 11957 Location of Well North Brown Lot - Lot 1 • Main Road Orient: Depth of Well Below Surface Static Water Level 110' (one hundred ten) 65' (sixty five) Water In Well Distanceto Septic System 45' (forty five) feet CASINGS Diameter Material Lengt 105 ' 2•• 4••_5• Galvanized-Iron-PVC Sea mg K.Packer-Rubber SCREENS MaterialOpenings t Stainless Steel 40 Gaug 10 Slot DiaTqVr Lenqth Depth to Top from Casing Well Yield 105' 1 Minimum 10 qpm LATERAL Diameter Material Make �••_1+/;• 100 psi-Polyethylene Orangeburg Depth of Lateral Minimum 54" DROP PIPE Diameter Length 1"-11/4" _ Material Galvanized PUMP INSTALLED Type Make Jet-Submersible Model Number Size Motivated Power Capacity at 20 psi Electric Minimum 5 pm TANK INSTALLED Make Type Size Sta Rite Constant Pressure 182 eqv Method of Drilling Method of Disinfecting Cable Tool Chlorination Type of Water Treatment Use of Water Dom Testwell CI f .;�'Remarks: I J STORAGE TANK: Inside Material VINYL Type of Tank Drain HOSE CONNECTION Pressure Gauge Installed YES Shut-off Valve prior to tank YES Sampling Tap Provided YES Shut off Valve with Bleeder Line YES installed on outflow of tank Check the Town in which the project is located: Nassau County: 13 Hempstead ❑North Hempstead O Oyster Bay Suffolk County: ❑Babylon 13 Brookhaven - ❑East Hampton 17 Huntington ❑Islip 13 Riverhead ❑Shelter Island ❑Smithtown ❑Southampton Mouthold Date Completed September 27, 2016 October 7, 2 O Driller License�Numbe�r- ��� 241 IIt 4t,4- !s f r f JJ r 1 CASOL A WEAL DrGL.LERS WELL CERTIFIC-ATE {.6j� t aqL 1 ;:0 2_ Suffolk ROH# S10-16-0003 County WPCG S134481T invoice#Job# Owner116 714 Tuthill Opsterponds Holding Co Address PO Box 86 Orient, NY 11957 Location of Well North Brown Lot — Lot 5 Main Road Orient Depth of Well Below Surface Static Water Level 117 ' (one hundred seventeen) ,. 65' (sixty five Water In Well Distance to Septic System feet 52' (f iftY two) CASINGS "" Material Length112' Diam or Galvanized-Iron-PVC 2' 4"- Sealing K.Packer-Rubber SC FENS Material Openings Stainless Steel 40 Gau a-10 Slot Le Depth to Top from Casing Minimum 10 pm 11.2' LATERAL Materia! [MakeDiameter 100 psi-Polyethylene Orangeburg 1"-1'�4" Depth of Lateral Minimum 54" DROP PIPE Diameter Length - 1"-1'�a" Material Galvanized pUMp INSTALLED Make Type Jet-Submersible Size Model Number Motivated Power Capacity at 20 psi Electric Minimum 5 Qpm TANK IIZNST�AL.LE.0 Make Type Size Sta Rite Constant Pressure n eqv " Method of Drilling Method of Disinfecting Cable Tool Chlorination , Use of W Type of Water Treatment Domesti -Testwetl e - Remarks: STORAGE TANK: Inside Material VINYL Type of Tank Drain HOSE CONNECTION Pressure Gauge Installed YES J Shut-off Valve prior to tank YES Sampling Tap Provided YES I Shut off Valve with Bleeder Line YES installed on outflow of tank Check the Town in which the project is located: Nassau County: El Hempstead ©North Hempstead ❑Oyster Bay i Suffolk County: ❑Babylon ❑Brookhaven ❑East Hampton ❑Huntington ❑Islip ❑Riverhead ❑Shelter Island ❑Smithtown 0 Southampton INouthold Date Completed September 27 , 2016 to Driller ' ense Numbed October 7 ,2016 2 ASOLA WELL DRILLERS WELL CERTIFICATE _ County Suffolk 60H# S10-16-0004 WPOC S-134483T Owner Invoice#Job# Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Co. 116714 Address PO Box 86 Orient, NY 11957 Location of Well South Brown Lot — Lot 1 behind 26700 Main Road Orient Depth of Well Below Surface ! Static Water Level 50' (fifty) i 7 ' (seven) Water In Well Distance to Septic System 43' (forty three) feet CASINGSDia r Material Length 2' _¢•_ Galvanized-Iron-PVC 47 ' Sea. g K.Packer-Rubber SCREENS Material Openings Stainless Steel 40 Gau 10 Slot Diam er Length Depth to Top from Casing ell Yield 47 ' Minimum 10 gpm LATERAL Diameter Material Make V, 1+/," 100 psi-Polyethylene Orangeburg Depth of Lateral Minimum 54" DROP PEPS Diameter Length 1"-1'/a" Material Galvanized PLUMP INSTALLED Type Make Jet-Submersible Model Number Size Motivated Power Capacity at 20 psi Electric Minimum 5 gpm 1. TANK INSTALLED 1 Make Type Size Sta Rite Constant Pressure 82 eqv Method of Drilling Method of Disinfecting Cable Tool Chlorination Type of Water Treatment Use of Dome tic-Testweil I - 14 Remarks: STORAGE TANK: Inside Material VINYL Type of Tank Drain HOSE CONNECTION Pressure Gauge installed YES Shut-off Valve prior to tank YES Sampling Tap Provided YES Shut off Valve with Bleeder Line YES installed on outflow of tank Check the Town in which the project is located: Nassau County: 17 Hempstead 0 North Hempstead 13 Oyster Bay Suffolk County: ❑Babylon E3 Brookhaven ❑East Hampton ❑Huntington 0 Islip Cl Riverhead 0 Shelter Island 0 Smithtown ❑Southampton Olouthold Date Completed September 27 , 2016 rill Lin October 7, 2016 ce,se Numbe6 l 7 OJ t Se/ s vv •N � _c�rrtc� >� s SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICESi t pf car —0– --Q00-S Well Number-S 111 aaaq -H.S.REF.NO. COMPLETION REPORT-LONG ISLAND WELL OWNER •LOG I ! Ground Surface ADDREStS 1 -7 C D' 0—) W, WA" I EL. ft.above sea LOCATION OF WELL DEPTH OF WELL BELOW SU ACE y DEPTH160 TO GROUNDWATER FROM SURFACE B TOP F WELL ���3 CASINGS i/�I' DIAMETER yo b W in. I in. � - In. � in. LENGTH _ r G�� W Oct t'/ SEALING ft I CASINGS REMOVED ftft C.3 SCREENS rad MAKE _ OPENING i` C, 4 DIAMETER T In. I In.- I In. � In. LENGTH ft. I ft. ft. DEPTH TO TOP FRO TOP OF CASING PUMPING TEST DATE J _S TEST OR PERMANEN UMP? DURATION OF TEST MAXIMUM DISCHARGE days Q–hours gallons per min. STATIC LEVEL PIOR TO TEST LEVEL DURING , XIMUM PUMPING in:below in.below ft. top of casing j top of casing MAXIMUM DRAWDOWN Approximate time of return to normal level after cessation of pumping ft hours min. PUMP INSTALLED ' TYPE �,f MAK MODELNUMBER Ob MOTIVE POWER MAIX H.P. CAPACITY g.p.m.against ft of discharge head NUMBER OF BOWLS OR STAGES e j It.of total head DROP LINE SUCTION LINE DIAMETER DIAMETER in. In. LENGTH > LENGTH ft. ft. METHOD OF DRILLING USE OF WATER rotary Q cable tool❑ other D cl.-m e,571 WORK STARTH COMPLETED SATE DR LER ' REGI T TION NO. 9Q Y �� �► a� C 12, -NOTE:Show log of well materials encountered,with depth below ground surface,water bearing beds and water levels in each,casings,screens,pump,additional pumping tests and other matters of interest.Describe repair jab.See instructions as to well Driller's Licenses and Reports.Pages 5-7 1 Of 2 1 Well Yield: G.P.M. Casing: Type of Material Q — - Drop Line: Type of Material if plastic, was torque arrestor used? 3/.16" S.S. cable installed? A11- Sanitary Seal : Type Used ►?� :�1 _.—_ Storage Tanks: Siz-e— Inside 1nside Material ' - Type of Tank Drain �- �'►� YQ I Pressure Gauge Installed Shut-Off Valve Prior to Tank v `• Sampling Tap Provided tet, Shut-Off Valve With,gleeder Line Installed on Outflow of Tank I Method of Disinfection: d'�1 I�2 Well Lateral: Depth Below Grade S-- l Material -Water Treatment Equipment Installed For Treat of' Ma ke Type Mo umber. _ Well Driller's Signature Name Company Name e' Mailing Address - �.� � �3 3 — Telephone Number _ 3 18-13S9:7186 No r ASOLA WELL DIULLER5 WELL CERTIFICATE County Suffolk BOH# S10-16-0005 WPCC S-134482T Owner Invoice#,lob# Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Co. 116714 Address PO Box 86 Orient, NY 11957 Location of Well ;ort-h Dyer Lot - 21505 Main Road Orient Depth of Well Below Surface Static Water Level 61 ' (sixty one) 18' (eighteen) Water In Well Distance to Septic System 43 ' (forty three) feet CASINGS Dia er Material Length 2" 4"3 5" Galvanized-Iron-PVC 58' Sealing K. Packer-Rubber SCREENS Material Openings Stainless Steel 40 Gau -10 Slot Diameter L ngth 2" 4..-5" 3' 51-10' Dept Top from Casing Well Yield Minimum 10 gpm LATERAL Diameter Material Make 1"—1'/d" 100 psi-Polyethylene Orangeburg Depth of Lateral Minimum 54" DROP PIPE Diameter Length 1"-11/4" Material Galvanized PUMP INSTALLED Type Make Jet-Submersible Model Number Size Motivated Power Capacity at 20 psi Electric I Minimum 5 gpm TANK INSTALLED Make Type Size Sta Rite Constant Pressure 82 eqv Method of Drilling Method of Disinfecting Cable Tool -Chlorination Type of Water Treatment Use of Wa Domesti -Testwell Remarks: r STORAGE TANK: Inside Material VINYL Type of Tank Drain HOSE CONNECTION Pressure Gauge Installed YES Shut-off Valve prior to tank YES Sampling Tap Provided YES Shut off Valve with Bleeder Line installed on outflow of tank YES r Check the Town in which the project is located: Nassau County: 0 Hempstead ❑North Hempstead ❑Oyster Bay Suffolk County: ❑Babylon ❑Brookhaven ❑East Hampton ❑Huntington 17 Islip 13 Riverhead 0 Shelter Island 17 Smithtown ❑Southampton Mouthold Date Completed September 27 , 2016 Drill License Number October 7 , 2016 241 yr'r_- 'rt"1 s- 'R�• •..Sr "•` �_'�`- '_^,.,tee_ "•• x�-• '�i��tit ..1s -t.• -a" t` +='�' "'.,��._, s• ,-.,> ;^..?'..,-? :. .�,_.-sn>iC_ o�'._ raTa`- -• �'a -s: •'-.,��R.Y��>-�-....cL�_'k ,_sr-r-'q_'^����`'�',.i,�ic-:�a• '=' Se?•f'�'_„s� f..-.'=",_ - rr=�✓t_.,r.'-yr'._•e'S�.c�"- 3ar..-=3...•c'�-- +- t c� fir. ;;�;��-;'�;`.,�_ �=�•q v�r� -�s,� :;�'"� -;:Y�E<":is' �R�,.� -'�^���t�� � �G -�,`t c;+"',',;.;- 4C�;r�-s•s7,�_�y�,-•�.' r =_,-�:i,,�`��-�=`��C.�,+�� -�- �� G�fy�`��t� _ '`:�`• - _ - 3 =r=" i.Jl"'-.5•`ti-_yc.: +"�f.,, �=�-,'^--4 '-r'^.'sT Cu .- `tYi-r' •G`�ti�Y- � �..c irY-.�, >,.+_ '•` F.a yvY'1Sc;a_-_-�w•rigµn�_�.-ar•_� -0.c 'a-.a�f.�'-��_�_v.�:=-"^-ac-- •,t:.'_a��:"s't,.'�.,'-.��-•�C.,•r3-r '.''=��"�4s�^��H��s� .fw"�`'�_ _ �-,+a>S'gy'�-:'�s�= n�..C''C���``'S-�u2�S,£ .:�f. �'�•-ry-.... -' 'C"'�" - Y't:� �{ `-L '4'..., S-•� Y _ -ris"� '�- L` ~_ •s�"��'+"�w�3�` �f.. �- �-�.�,-0:- �.'-.- rv�_,c•;� `�'-�'�';�;_:'-�:..-.iy�crr� Yn. y'�°?•��.:��7=t �� V r f-tm-�•a ��.,?*,.'�.,�'-`ies'a_- �cs:c.-3.."•'3,-„_¢A��',n:=:P4,.:��^..�s��"K_•'_-_�x���?,'zr..;,=Y'c�a"'rti fi=t•.^ •�T-' �.- >>-•r•�-�`'_�i7"fv...:-'-.r^._' - ,��:rs���' _ _- _.._ � - __ - --- - ..=�..»L'.�:+-�e�c.:=;•_ +S:.'-a.�- ' 'f'-",: :`r.J-L�✓=r..xiy-���4'c,-�;"-��.�sr=N-'. .,,^�� -`:'�y�`�r fF0619 ,6;P=• GEP- WELL b �UMP.Ci}F?�---'-•- i0-�,c3-zS'afj�-.- ���lJ± _ Q.�_,.�{.-_ � _ a'R�'j�r55� • - _ - - - _ - '_- - -: •- - _ _ •- - _ :. _1: _ -_ - wry, Y _ SITFFOLK - 0f371"`�'aD�PA �iviENT OF=:NLTH-. ERV�GES RE? -SI17465T_- - -CA1YlP�ETI ON=-REPORT- :-1-_ONG�-i Si:_13Nfl'�ME�L-_ _• --s-� '=- , • _ _='iia�ao:°_' _ - :1'ITHiLZ.. Y, CC:I:A2v?-TRIsS - _ - - --_-. -'` - ECX==176='=�DUTH�Tt3�:�.-�• _Il_9b9 - - _ _ _ -- - � _ ,_ ���-�•-•'��^+��o:r --= - �• LOCy310tt-Of we" - S)ETfK OF7ELL {7w SLIRFA£t_'' - DEFiN 1Q CttO1J7iD irATE![EfCSiB[FACf _ , OP Oi_iEa,C: _ Y Vic$.17.37A' ti - - -- CASI L. _ ,jp�• _ __ _ _ _ _ _ -- - _ -- - - _ bERraso sad fxcw•sr,p'C*_us�c_ - -- - - - - - - s tsar•.,-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Esrvq �uwrr_ - _ - - QUtA77 - t1N OF•Y- - ST#_71CtEYCE:Ptl9�Ztf- tF11'fl'Di�iitri'a�_il►xtf8E7ll - -- - _ - __ -a_t�alMlllKi�_MDC7YJi-_ _ _- #PDrorLtatctLpe•oEfalYni;td !_-leyeiileerirsssa�k' -- - --_- -_ - -- _- -= - - - - ~��=• - - - mss= - - - - - -- -.-ti--` _ PlaisfivEeD 77Elm - - - - _ - - aat i:it :R ` Anix " - iSEOL _ _ _ _ �3�lr:p_icaLle-eoot;r�t:��T�L`�u_-•'�•- _ - - _T£�T' - - - - - - - __- _"- _ _- _ ; qty .S - - - -- - - - _ OFE- [>aar:�Og fktEil'=iRalPriatSi�lCoirit� d` rei3i'd #ieiosr- - - *atlT Dem - ; - _ __?$_beds_ std'= aer�ev_els int c�sirigs,:streeris,=p�iii - -- _ - a iiO!q!,ps:mp�ng firsts ai _a ierirtatcets of iaEiresi:�escrs'bprepair3oPb�:' - -` - :- _ _ -_ see-'tristr_it~i,ions:�s•=ro lYe4i Dr',9Seis"Lic�nses'�asid,AeDats -7.� 2. 'ma = Vis a� is. a- ='i< MR- a r :. lzl,�•�+q; �•��-'r ter_ �:�a`= 'y .��` - r "y ,{ _ ���:�'.�y,.-i��-����� �Craa..^a-: �` 4�� i�s R ��5•��. `.T95?"- ' �-_'G`'•-•� _Jae�_��r �d--+-��.y�k�'L' _4`e.-7•'a. - - _ EIBF'hIEl_l ---ri14F-CIiFF�_ —.-TO "S;-'"s"47: - _ - �t' .lof-ftterta-. _PVts. brow tii►e: 7 pe:Cf lki+ec -- If=pa_sLfcr• = _ was orq�te-arrestor used? - _ - _ `- '�' ustall'ed?`_�o =S - Yee Usid t = _-_ -�San�taa=}:Seal-:•- - - - - _ - -- -- - - - -• -- --- - - " - _- W/is, T - - r i de :material - .; s i Tj of, h `ns ached= -- :Stvt= 4 Prov rte tiffs _ _ - lit � a - l - i3-�oti� - - =3et�i=d of'D:�slct - = - - _ - - t� �1��-:ice• tai-_.�eia�==� d __ --- --- - - - :�, ` - - - - - Z a�T.`• - --_- - - - - __ _ - - _ - _ _ - - - - = - - __ _ _- __ ��r-- -'may - - _ ' Set-=' timber. 7 77 77- _ - - - -���tr ay_'Si��•..:_ - - _ - _ _ - _ _ ;tae]-" - - - - idl 4g SS �' - _ � _ - � -- - � - -- _- --_=Y r - ':�P+�i_r�/Pc-.•__ _-_-__ - - _ _- --_ syr -�S"""ti'r�`- •='-f_�� ASOLA WELL DRILLERS WELL CERTITICATir a County Suffolk SOH# 510-16-0007 ' WPCC S-134484T Owner Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Co. Invoice#Job# Address 116 714 PO Bog 86 Orient, NY II957 location of Weft South Dyer Lot — Main Road Depth of Well Below Surface Orient 45' (forty five)** Static water Level Water in Well 10' (ten) 35' (thirty five) Distance to Septic Sys tem feet Dia " r CASINGS 2'r-4 -5" Material Sealing Galvanized-iron-P�/C Leng 42 r K. Packer-Rubber Material SCREENS Stainless Steel Openings Diam ter 400 !'' 1 Slot 2"-4'-- " Length oep to Top from CasingV --IQ, ' eIf Yield Minimum tQ m Diameter LATERAL 07"-7 [Make- ��e- 100 Qsi-PolyethyleneDepth of Lateral bur Minimum 54" DROP PIPE Diameter Length Material Galvanized - PUMP INSTALLED Type Make Jet-Submersible Model Number Size Motivated Power Capacity at 20 psi Electric minimum 5 gprn TANK INSTALLED Aake Type Size ita Rite Constant Pressure 182 eqv - Method of Drilling Method of Disinfacting Cable Tool Chlorination Type of Water Treatment Use of Wa Dom rc-Testwe)f l '- Remarks: "High chlorides below! STORAGE TAMC: Inside Material VINYL Type of Tank Drain HOSE CONNECTION Pressure Gauge Installed YES Shut-off Valve prior to tank YES Sampling Tap Provided YES Shut off Valve with Bleeder Line installed on outflow of tank YES d Check the Town in which the project is located: Nassau County: ❑Hempstead ❑North Hempstead ❑ Oyster Say Suffolk County: ❑Babylon ❑Brookhaven ❑East Hampton ❑Huntington 13 Islip ❑Riverhead 13 Shelter Island ❑Smithtown ❑Southampton Mouthold - i i Date Completed September 27, 2016- ' Drille October 7, 2016 License NumbeL 241 -' CORRECTED WELL CERTIFICATE , CAS®LA WELL DRILLERSWELL CERTIRIZATE i County Suffolk BOH# S10-16-0007 WpCC S-134786T Owner Invoice#Job# Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Co. 120503 Address 1025 Mumm Lane #86 Orient, NY 11957 Locati of Well Lot 2- outh Dyer Lot vacant land Main Road Orient D Wasiow Suriace Static Water Level 50' fi ' Water In Well Distance to Septic System 43' (forty three feet CASINGS Diabo4er Material Length 47' 2" 5" Galvanized-iron-PVC Sealing K.Packer-Rubber SCREENS Material Openings Stainless Steel_ 40GaiJg 10 Slot Diar Leriath Depth to'Top from Casing Weli Yield Minimum 10 gpm IATERAL Diameter Material Make 1"-1;'a" 100 psi-Polyethylene Orangeburg . Depth of-Lateral Minimum 54' _ DROP PIPE Diameter Length 1"-1114" Material ' Galvanized PUMP INSTALLED Type Make Jet-Submersible Model Dumber Size Motivated Power Capacity at 20 psi Electric Minimum 5 'pm t TANK INSTALLED Make Type size Sta Rite . Constant Pressure 82 eqv Method of Drilling Method of Disinfecting Cable Tool _Chlorination Type of Water Treatment Use of Wat Domesti -Testwell Y ' (4 Remarks: STORAGE TANK: Inside Material VINYL Type of Tank Drain HOSE CONNECTION Pressure Gauge Installed YES Shut-off Valve prior to-tank YES Sampling Tap Provided YES Shut off Valve with Bleeder Line YES installed on outflow of tank Check the Town in which the project is located: Nassau County: O Hempstead ®North Hempstead ®Oyster Bay Suffolk County: D Babylon 13 Brookhaven ❑East Hampton ❑Huntington 0 Islip U Riverhead ®Shelter Island 13 Smithtown 17 Southampton X:1CSouthold Date Completed July 3, 2017 Date D' License Number September 25, 2017 41 CASOLA WELL DRILLERS =� - WELL CERTIFICATE County Suffolk BOH# S10-16-0007 WPCC S-134787T Owner Invoice#Job# Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Co. 120503 Address 1025 Mumm Lane #86 Orient; NY 11957 Location t.1N2 ,�'Lot 4�-_.6outh Dyer Lot vacant land Main Road, Orient Dep a Below Surface Static Water Level 52' (fifty two' 9' nine Water In Well Distance to Septic System 43' (forty three feet CASINGS DiaMetger Material Length 2" 4"-5" Galvanized-Iron-PVC 49' Sealing K. Packer-Rubber SCREENS Material Openings Stainless Steel 40 Gau 10 Siot Diameter Length 2" 4" v' 3 5'-10' Dep to Top from Casing Well Yield ' Minimum 70 qpLn LATERAL Diameter Material Make 111-11/41, 1 100 psi-Polyethylene Orangeburg Depth of Lateral Minimum 54" _ DROP PIPE Diameter Length Material Galvanized PUMP INSTALLED, Type Make Jet-Submersible Model Number Size Motivated Power Capacity at 20 psi Electric Minimum 5 gpm TANK INSTALLED Make Type Size Sta Rite Constant Pressure 82 eqv Method of Drilling Method of Disinfecting Cable Tool Chlorination Type of Water Treatment Use of W Domes c-Testwell r Remarks: STORAGE TANIG Inside Material VINYL Type of Tank Drain HOSE CONNECTION Pressure Gauge Installed YES Shut-off Valve prior to tank YES Sampling Tap Provided YES Shut off Valve with Bleeder Line YES installed on outfioty of tank Check the Town in which the project is located: Nassau County. 0 Hempstead 17 North Hempstead 13 Oyster Bay Suffolk County: 0 Babylon 0 Brookhaven 13 East Hampton 0 Huntington ❑Islip O Riverhead 0 Shelter Island 0 Smithtown ❑Southampton XXSouthold Date Completed July 3, 2017 Date ,,2017 ler License Number September 13 WWM-025(Rev. 8/05) SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES OFFICE OF WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT : 360 YAPHANK AVENUE,SUITE 2C YAPHANK,NEW YORK 11980 NOTICE 2 (631)852-5700 GMZ 4 NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION—SUBIDIVISION TO: John Condon, PE SUB NAME: Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Condon Engineering, PC Company-North Brown 1755 Sigsbee Road Mattituck,NY 11952 REF.NO.: 510-16-0003 SCTM NO: 1000-18-3-30.3 Your submission for the referenced subdivision has been reviewed. This office will require the following for further review and/or approval: ❑ Application form signed by licensed design professional and owner ❑ Yield map,minimum square foot lots. ❑Filing fee$ due. - ❑ Test hole(s) located and witnessed by: ❑Health Dept.-Call 852-2097 to schedule inspection. Install in area of proposed sewage disposal system. ❑ Test well(s) sampled by Health Department. Follow procedures enclosed. (Test well does not indicate a waiver of requirement for connection to public water) ❑ Public water availability letter from water district(Include distance&cost if water main extension is required). ❑ Public sewer availability letter from local sewer district. ® Wetlands permit or determination letter. ❑ Design report by licensed design professional for the onsite sewage disposal system and water supply. ® Covenants: Language to follow. See Special paragraph(s)for: Pvt. wells, Open space, &No further subdiv. ® SEQRA determination from County ❑ Certificate of Authorization, or disclaimer. addition, the following is required to be shown on a preliminary/final map or on a separate sewage disposal/water supply plan signed and sealed by a licensed design professional: ® Metes and Bounds Description; lot areas,key map* (1) ❑ Suffolk County Tax Map Number* ® Sewage disposal &water supply locations for all existing buildings on property(specify if none) ®Neighboring wells and sewage disposal systems within 150 feet of property(specify if none) (2) ❑ Design for the onsite sewage disposal and water supply per Department standards ❑ Design for sewer main extension approved by local sewer district (for existing sewers in Sewer District#3, sewer stubs must be marked by district on plan). ❑ Topographic contours. (5 ft. interval) - ❑ Water line locations) (label as existing/proposed)* _ _ ❑ Test well locations* ❑ Corner elevations and test hole elevation ® Dept. approval stamp* Change "Hauppauge, N.Y."to"Great River,N.Y." ® Test hole details* (3) ❑ Typical lot layout:water&sewage disposal* ® L.S. certification and ❑certification of sewage disposal & water supply design by P.E., R.A., or L.S. with exemption(original signatures & seals required)*. [ ] FINAL maps to be filed with County Clerk require items marked above with asterisk(*). ® Other: (1) Add metes and bounds to all proposed interior lot lines. (2) Show all existing private wells within 150' of property line, specify if none. (3) Add SCDHS test hole data to map. (4) Revise map name as "Tuthill Oysterponds Holding_Company-North Brown". Submit a minimum of four maps for review. CC: Carol Tuthill REVIEWED BY:Michelle Ersbak mE 1220 Peninsula Drive Tavares,FL 32778 DATE: May 3, 2017 Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company P.O. Box 86 Orient,NY 11957 PLEASE RFTITRN A COPY OF THIS FORM WITH ANY RF.SITRMISSION(S) l F WWM-025(Rev.8/05) SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES OFFICE OF WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT 360 YAPHANK AVENUE,SUITE 2C YAPHANK,NEW YORK 11980 NOTICE 3 (631)852-5700 GMT 4 NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION—SUBDIVISION TO: John Condon,PE SUB NAME: Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Condon Engineering,PC Company- South Brown 1755 Sigsbee Road REF.NO.: S10-16-0004 Mattituck,NY 11952 SCTM NO: 1000-18-6-17.3 Your submission for the referenced subdivision has been reviewed. This office will require the following for further review and/or approval: ❑ Application form signed by licensed design professional and owner ❑ Yield map,minimum square foot lots. ❑Filing fee$ due. ❑ Test hole(s) located and witnessed by: ❑Health Dept.-Call 852-2097 to schedule inspection. Install in area of proposed sewage disposal system. ® Test well(s) sampled by Health Department. Follow procedures enclosed. (Test well does not indicate a waiver of requirement for connection to public water)Based on water quality results of the test well on Lot 1, a second test well located on another lot is required. ❑ Public water availability letter from water district(Include distance&cost if water main extension is required). ❑ Public sewer availability letter from local sewer district. ® Wetlands permit or determination letter. ❑ Design report by licensed design professional for the onsite sewage disposal system and water supply. ® Covenants:Language to be determined. See Special paragraph(s)for: Pvt. wells (TBD) &Access easement SEQRA determination from County ❑ Certificate of Authorization,or disclaimer. In addition, the following is required to be shown on a preliminary/final map or on a separate sewage disposal/water supply plan signed and sealed by a licensed design professional: ® Metes and Bounds Description,lot areas,key map* (1)(2) ❑ Suffolk County Tax Map Number* ® Sewage disposal &water supply locations for all existing buildings on property(specify if none) ® Neighboring wells and sewage disposal systems within 150 feet of property(specify if none) (3) ❑ Design for the onsite sewage disposal and water supply per Department standards ❑ Design for sewer main extension approved by local sewer district (for existing sewers in Sewer District#3, sewer stubs must be marked by district on plan)--, - - -. --—❑ Topographic contours. (5 ft.interval) _ ❑ Water line location(s) (label as existing/proposed)* ® Test well locations* ❑ Comer elevations and test hole elevation ® Department approval stamp* (6) ® Test hole details* (4) ❑ Typical lot layout: water&sewage disposal* ® L.S. certification and ❑certification of sewage disposal & water supply design by P.E., R.A., or L.S. with exemption(original signatures&seals required)*. [*] FINAL maps to be filed with County Clerk require items marked above with asterisk(*). ® Other: (1)Label Open Space lot as "Lot.2". (2) Add metes and bounds to all proposed interior lot lines. (3) Show all existing private wells within 150' of property line specify if none. (4) Show actual locations of test well and test hole. Add SCDHS test hole data to map. (5) Revise leaching pool detail to show inlet pipe entering top ring, not dome. (6) Update Director as "Walter DMdiak, PE". Also replace "Hauppauge, N.Y." with "Great River, N.Y." (7) Revise map name as "Tuthill 0 ste onds Holding Company-South Brown". Submit a minimum of four maps for review. —7C: Carol Tuthill REVIEWED BY: Michelle Ersbak ` 1220 Peninsula Drive Tavares,FL 32778 ' DATE: May 3,2017 Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company P.O.Box 86 Orient,NY 11957 DT T,'A QL' DTTTTDI►T A PnDV !11V TMQ lPnDM WTTU ANV DFQ1TRMTQQ'FnN1Q1 WWM -025 (Rev.8/05) SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES OFFICE OF WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT 360 YAPHANK AVENUE,SUITE 2C YAPHANK,NEW YORK 11980 NOTICE 3 (631)852-5700 GMZ 4 NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION—SUBDIVISION TO: John Condon, PE SUB NAME: Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Condon Engineering,PC Company -North Dyer 1755 Sigsbee Road REF.NO.: S10-16-0005 Mattituck,NY 11952 SCTM NO: 1000-17-4-16 Your submission for the referenced subdivision has been reviewed. This office will require the following for further review and/or approval: ❑ Application form signed by licensed design professional and owner ❑ Yield-map,minimum - - - square foot-lots. ❑Filing fee-$- - -- - due. ❑ Test hole(s)located and witnessed by: ❑Health Dept.-Call 852-2097 to schedule inspection. Install in area of proposed sewage disposal system. ❑ Test well(s) sampled by Health Department. Follow procedures enclosed. (Test well does not indicate a waiver of requirement for connection to public water) ❑ Public water availability letter from water district (Include distance& cost if water main extension is required). ❑ Public sewer availability letter from local sewer district. ® Wetlands permit or determination letter. ❑ Design report by licensed design professional for the onsite sewage disposal system and water supply. ® Covenants: Language to follow. See Special paragraph(s) for: Pvt.wells& Open Space ® SEQRA determination from County ❑ Certificate of Authorization, or disclaimer. a addition, the following is required to be shown on a preliminaryTiinal map or on a separate sewage disposal/water supply plan signed and sealed by a licensed design professional: N Metes and Bounds Description,lot areas,key map* (1)(2) ❑ Suffolk County Tax Map Number* ® Sewage disposal &water supply locations for all existing buildings on property(specify if none) ®Neighboring wells and sewage disposal systems within 150 feet of property (specify if none) (3) ❑ Design for the onsite sewage disposal and water supply per Department standards ❑ Design for sewer main extension approved by local sewer district (for existing sewers in Sewer District#3, sewer stubs must be marked by district on plan) ❑ Topographic contours. (5 ft. interval) ❑ Water line locations) (label as_existing/proposed)* ❑ Test well locations* _ ❑ Corner elevations and test hole elevation ® Department approval stamp* (6) ® Test hole details* (4) ❑ Typical lot layout:water&sewage disposal* ® L.S. certification and ❑certification of sewage disposal & water supply design by P.E., R.A., or L.S. with exemption(original signatures&seals required)*. [ ] FINAL maps to be filed with County Clerk require items marked above with asterisk(*). ® Other: (1)Label Open Space Areas Lots 7 8 9 & 10 (2) Add metes and bounds to all proposed interior lot lines. (3) Show all existing private wells within 150' of pMerty line specify if none (4)Add SCDHS test hole data to man. (5)Revise leaching pool detail to show inlet pipe entering top ring not dome (6) Update Director as "Walter DMdiak, PE". Also, replace "Hauppauge N.Y." with "Great River N.Y." (7) Revise map name as "Tuthill OyAnonds Holding Company-North Dyer" Submit a minimum of four maps for review. CC: Carol Tuthill ? REVIEWED BY: Michelle Ersbak PIE 4 1220 Peninsula Drive Tavares,FL 32778 I DATE: May 3,2017 1 Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company P.O.Box 86 Orient,NY 11957 PT,F ASF RFTTTRN A COPY OF TfUS FORM WTTN ANY RFSTTRMTSfiTON(S) t WWM -025 (Rev.8/05) > SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES 1 OFFICE OF WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT 360 YAPHANK AVENUE,SUITE 2C YAPHANK,NEW YORK 11980 NOTICE 2 (631)852-5700 GMZ 4 4 NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION—SUBDIVISION TO: John Condon,PE SUB NAME: Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Condon Engineering,PC Company- South Dyer 1755 Sigsbee Road REF.NO.: S10-16-0007 Mattituck,NY 11952 SCTM NO: 1000-17-6-14.2 Your submission for the referenced subdivision has been reviewed. This office will require the following for further review and/or approval: ❑ Application form signed by licensed design professional and owner -�—❑ Yieldimap,minimum - square-foot-lots. — F❑Filing fee-$ - due. — - - ❑ Test hole(s) located and witnessed by: ❑Health Dept.-Call 852-2097 to schedule inspection. Install in area of proposed sewage disposal system. ® Test well(s) sampled.by Health Department. Follow procedures enclosed. (Test well does not indicate a waiver of requirement for connection to public water) Based on water quality results, both test wells must be deepened an additional 40', or relocated. ❑ Public water availability letter from water district(Include distance& cost if water main extension is required). ❑ Public sewer availability letter from local sewer district. ® Wetlands permit or determination letter. ❑ Design report by licensed design professional for the onsite sewage disposal system and water supply. ® Covenants: Language to be determined. See Special paragraph(s) for: Pvt. wells (TBD) Board of Review variance. ❑Non-conformance notice enclosed. -- SEQRA determination from County ❑ Certificate of Authorization, or disclaimer. In addition, the following is required to be shown on a preliminary/final map or on a separate sewage disposal/water supply plan signed and sealed by a licensed design professional: ® Metes and Bounds Description,lot areas,key map* (1)(2) ❑ Suffolk County Tax Map Number* ® Sewage disposal&water supply locations for all existing buildings on property (specify if none) ®Neighboring wells and sewage disposal systems within 150 feet of property(specify if none) (3) ❑ Design for the onsite sewage disposal and water supply per Department standards ❑ Water line--location(s)-(label as,existing/proposed)*_____ ❑ Test_welllocations*__ ❑ Corner elevations and test hole elevation ® Department approval stamp* (4) ® Test hole details* (4) ❑ Typical lot layout: water& sewage disposal* ® L.S. certification and ❑certification of sewage disposal & water supply design by P.E., R.A., or L.S. with exemption(original signatures & seals required)*. [ ] FINAL maps to be filed with County Clerk require items marked above with asterisk(*). ® Other: (1) Add metes and bounds to all proposed interior lot lines. (2) Show all existing private wells within 150' of property line specify if none 3)Add SCDHS test hole data to map (4)Replace "Hauppauge N.Y."with"Great River N.Y." (5)Revise map name as "Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company- South Dyer". Submit a minimum of four maps for review. CC: Carol Tuthill REVIEWED BY: Michelle Ersbak m 1 1220 Peninsula Drive ' Tavares,FL 32778 DATE: May 3,2017 Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company o, � � 11tr5r - p Nj doy P.O.Box 86 }hfi j IGrc�'�Ca�vs��� Orient,NY 11957 PT.FASF RFTTTRN A COPY OF THIS FORM WITH ANY RFSTTRMTSSTON(S) H A. WWM-025(Rev.8105) SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES ( (0/ OFFICE OF WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT 360 YAPHANK AVENUE,SUITE 2C YAPHANK,NEW YORK 11980 NOTICE 3 (631)852-5700 GMZ 4 NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION—SUBDIVISION TO: John Condon,PE SUB NAME: Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Condon Engineering,PC Company- South Dyer 1755 Sigsbee Road REF,NO.: S10-16-0007 Mattituck,NY 11952 SCTM NO: 1000-17-6-14.2 Your snbmission for the referenced subdivision has been reviewed.This office will require the following for further review and/or approval: ❑ Application form signed by licensed design professional and owner ❑ Yield map,minimum square foot lots. ❑Filing fee$ due. ❑ Test hole(s)located and witnessed by: ❑Health Dept.-Call 852-2097 to schedule inspection. Install in area of proposed sewage disposal system. ❑ Test wells) sampled by Health Department.Follow procedures enclosed. (Test well does not indicate a waiver of requirement for connection to public water) ❑Public water availability letter from water district(Include distance&cost if water main extension is required). ❑ Public sewer availability letter from local sewer district. ®Wetlands permit or determination letter. ❑Design report by licensed design professional for the onsite sewage disposal system and water supply. i B(Covenants:Language to follow. See Special paragraph(s)for: Private wells(meets standards,no treatment) _r]Board of Review variance. ❑Non-conformance notice enclosed. SEQRA determination from County ❑Certificate of Authorization,or disclaimer. In addition, the following is required to be shown on a preliminaryfflinal map or on a separate sewage disposal/water supply plan signed and sealed by a licensed design professional: ; ®Metes and Bounds Description,lot areas,key map*(1) ❑ Suffolk County Tax Map Number* ® Sewage disposal&water supply locations for all existing buildings on property(specify if none) ®Neighboring wells and sewage disposal systems within.150 feet of property(specify if none)(2) y ❑ Design for the onsite sewage disposal and water supply per Department standards ❑ Water line location(s)(label as existing/proposed)* ®Test well locations* ❑ Corner elevations and test hole elevation ®Department approval stamp*(5) ` ® Test hole details` (4) 1 Typical lot layout: water&sewage disposal` ® L.S. certification and ❑certification of sewage disposal & water supply design by P.E., R.A., or L.S. with exemption(original signatures &seals required)*. [ ] FINAL maps to be filed with County Clerk require items marked above with asterisk ® Other: (1) Add metes and bounds to all "rouosed interior lot lines (2) Show all gxistinu private wells within 150' of proXertv line speciy if none (3) Show all test well locations on map (4)Add SCDHS test hole data to man. (5)Replace "Hauppauge N Y"with "Great River N Y° (6,Revise map name as "Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company- South Dver" Submit a minimum of four maps for review. i CC: Carol Tuthill REVIEWED BY:Michelle Kurzweil ah 1220 Peninsula Drive ' Tavares,FL 32778 DATE:March 23,2018 Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company i P.O.Box 86 ' Orient,NY 11957 PI ASR RETURN A COPY OF TITS FORM WTTH ANY RRSTIRMTSSTON(Sl i s A�ptjND 305 s4 •' 6�,9 FINAL MAP OF TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM I.1D s. � ' (NOT TO SCALE) TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLDING COMPANY � �� _ � �1 ���DpADE NORTH BROWN 0146 03 g6 - 's P F ` _ r.-- wa Fa '4 t,1-6 a`As`aw SYe €•s i- --- / y ,�`` x cE€P-�,_�_ �/=c,s,ai;•covra, .� SITUATE =` w�; 3rti° r _ ,�.r --- _ -- �: ORIENT rl y'tl TOWN OF SOUTHOLD y� - ,Y✓/Jy✓yi -�% s� 1 I` E` SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. TAX No. 1000-18-03-30.3 5a PEN SPACE � •� E � E ��t ��a` SCALE 1"=100' Y 1 1,665 sq. ft. i QZ Yk APRIL 1, 2011 I L''smHs T67 WELL g€�iOGAN -(,t) 'T 'b`:ar~s I � JUNE 23, 2011 YEILD MAP f 5 e 167' =re,YEs s f m v.�er; f e --_`��, APRIL 2,2013 SKETCH PLAN t -4� cla f 1-w�'i r st°teAUGUST 26,2013 REVISED MAP '�T F to+<Acrt t -rrnvE K uda+A,+r i61, ^m iwCar4Y.f F:cut t_s.of za smrs -r »�" OCTOBER 22.2013 REVISED MAP LOT 3 1 ,� As� +'+N-'�'r•%ss_s•r.. Ee A v,/x x"'R 'tnttxM.�>/,e r Nr �,+fa•i�xness oo. (° - JANUARY 19, 2016 SCDHS FILING b •� 1 / y 'fty w,tu .cu A's lv�'-'t w•�un P-,�»'t�:�a Rrr.a,/�-,so.�aE cr aa��f _,�„�,. - �i � MAY 31,2016 SCDHS COMMENTS / ?0 34.233 sq. it' r / `t 4p ue.n;•�: €F srcac w sof r r.,,,., ft T. '{.i#.r i •qq�• LOT,,' 2 / 1a a 4• Ica a>YI,•.-I'LL to e+s'<�Er t F.1.€i w at 61A<zr.sv:lw�:M A IU✓roEPar*xE Da,*//7 _ d JULY 7. 2017 SCDHS COMMENTS - T%. / 'Y W,R if txlh,+a N,L11 n-D V�J uY"«TF.+SAD W PFA GF, I :1-R 31.,131 9q. ff. ,i ) i i ,.-� t.A Ib r,..,urr:'GL�•a€Ea s-xr•itu,ND+e:rE svzti e-=urfesiEt r �`, .-,,,,,o,,*� +' AREA= 1.252.228 sq.H. (TO THE LINES) 28.747 cc. _- ---__--u��� , i/o 36.374 q. ff�? iP. 16o'/t __ _z: . 2r ( a -- -- - - ---- - <x t NOTES: % so• r 26B~ w •LE.A�,,N-IN6�66L ' 1. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. 1929 DATUM A �Arx EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUi T , s z = TEST HOLE/t EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: -- -Sv 3825 qt --=-=-=--- 2. ZONING USE DISTRICT: R-80 (LOCATED BY SCDHS) I i W c i !�. f % s k zveas 5.aia.-st a±ccs'+•a'.ec<`-d e:F.`era t6;.`:rx7 LOT 5 i / %171 ;A st.A. ' aR�'+xese Its c r„c<;u�t w.r€a t•c se..�a unn>z�=-s 3. BLUFF AREA= 90,016 aq. ft. 6,.._,LIN/n,% FttnY€N gra rz+.mort r„exs fl-11 rt+m,,;smet 4.THERE ARE NO EXISTING SEWAGE DISPOSAL OR WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES ft. "'--- a ax s A��w D~1 eft vf£ Ar,ter rw arm..1. srnrr f...:s.uxe r,€urm,,.ro;o = _ q.> ' SAY i WOODED "' ON EXISTING PROPERTY. G j ' ,'SCDHS TEST WELL, O� •, 344a.. a i TEST NOTE �f.- tr'yT /2 _ J = _ =yy >�E SUBDIVISION REPORT(NORTH BROWN) ' (LOCATED BY SCDHS) _ S`�• 1% SUBDMS70N TYPE 70..6E AREA ' BaticABl[ GENUTm 0[vF1nPlExr D[Yk1oRYOrt muIRED DPW APPRDIOWic •h ' ,� d� NiG AfRA LOT YIELD YIELD ARFA SPAa IDT sDE II ' »• _ '' V`AO 20.66 aa-N G. 26.66-2 0.60 oD R 4sJw0 i No/u t4 /l r _ 1/ ___ �_�•�?! y •P STANDARD 26.76 ao. 207 m. 26.66- 2666 X 43AN X 0.565/60.000-ILS 12 .10.67 ao. MIN e.. .`30.966»9•D• / �` •l+-r/D ,.ty, 75 5 ]A70 ao 2A1 00. mis- 26.66 X 45,560/WA00.I 146 2 am Ae �'.�6°,�mi / % w LOT 6 S= �t Co 1aIMATION OPEN SPACE r '' ej 06 60 80 24 m X 0.m 26.66 m-0.55 m s.1 X 4spn Y e4m/6 888,821 sq. ff. fx C04VINATION 26.76 m 2.D1 ao. 25668 as 211 X 43.060/60.000.14A 14A X OAO.6a .6Ji ay 25y as •naa _+•-.,= c_9/,/ 045 J` _ `fS. °o. //ODs TEST HOLE#1 TEST HOLE#2 1 1. �/ WOODED i F SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES TYPICAL PLOT PLANS / //4j ELUD ELna GREAT RIVER, (NOT TO SCALE) °-9 .�., �' j UVW Do on NY PROPERTY ufaE OryO•P.� �q 4471 '/� 19 LOAu 19 MADE WELL CUYIS= MY,58LTY SNIO Y / This's to certify that the proposed Really Subdnn'on or Development .AJ. j�Oe a // 1'1 l ,t1 9119 for m than ,b.y%yBURD2dC �•'.�, �o j (` �,' Ij »ith a Ictal of Tot wa qp'��y p hb' / /�/ -PP on the be-date Water Supplies nd Sewage Drsposal 20• 'Gy`�j da, / 9y sansu+o F-bbeii t conform to n tact- tandarde effect at the lime 5• �• •TOT p/A'0 !�.o // '$y 2,n - ro u Tec Pemu punuan Ho ? c /CULTIVATED FIELD f aanst.umon and a c i to p to v t to Inose C M1v'� 60' « %v rtandav sen Tnis�psprvval hall be 9el'a roruy Hy the aµty subdivis�ear 0 ca'++ / / QO '46 �'0 develo t m du](filed Rha the Coun Clark N'n one e !S W m '' ( AQ 3 39n of this date Consent is n S`NDI RAVEL SAIA6gNVa which ih's endorsement pPearsy'ni Ne Officeaof�N County Clerpk in SEPTIC Sd"� r 7 ,'1f'y0 dy�p .donee th the of the Publie Health Law and Na N4' ,/ SS Q p 459 MY Suffolk CountywS.M., 0 b. ��•••� Genions LEACHDiG /,�,� r4,' POOL t../ "CLL '•c{( (,,p / TEST HOLE BY SCHS 10/26/16 AND 10/27/16 &PAN9_ON i O QQ•D•P�` NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED POOL '" F A�'Ee• ,�/ / '. S99TF Wolter Dowyd'ak.PE PO D-don D-,on of Enwmn-mw 0-my ROAD a � / 4.� I hereby certify that the water supply(s) and/or sewage disposal system(s) for this project were designed by me orunder my direction Based upon a careful and thorough study of / the soil, site and groundwater conditions, all lots• as proposed, conform to the Suffolk County Department of Healthh,Services construction standards in effect as of this date p A � S J r E L0116 151WO c�aUtfO P�?Dp �C _ C 'p O'L, �A(� John J Condon, PE NYS Lic # 081912 CULTIVATED FIELD a 5� KEY MAP e SCALE 1"=600' ¢ i1 a d> > O y •S PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE SURVEYS THE MINIMUM 4y€ S OPTED EYIs �1 pO g6 �L a� STANDARDS FOR AND SURVEYS AS ESTABLISHED yyg1,�y. s? '�5c ��y 716 FFORBY THE SU SUCH A LS USE BYNTTHEPNEWVED YORKNSTAATT�LAND S _i Sv �! n ``g•5 Jr TITLE ASSOCIATION >ao CP�t�'Zc °'�°a`_ /147•, ii6�6�.Nw.i�iaxO N !/r y' i 6(/-.•°'r° q.o A",� - NYS U. No 50467 r -- Flo 2sl mo"rw°Niia7i uewa 1NC NEw Yuix STALE _� S 0 ' 1 NY 5 �or tws sown uw xm er.•m+c + V� f Wp,H Rapt FU SED SUL SX�W-Nin eE CD�SIOEREO -&a �6 Nathan Taft Corwin III \ To BEAVILDTRIC.1 sg R Land Surveyor CFDI61GMlN6 pIIw'lFD IEIdDN SW31 fa" SPR PTO TIE PEPSON TDR'w1EXr 111E a11RAY 1'miRGaimim Dw°NEn uswFx10cTeu+D �S tf-� O° ffiN p hh6 qqA •¢OAS Condon Engineering,P.C. suave ar To St.=d,eakren Jr.L5 ori CEw11DG1pN5 ME rl0r 1RAMSFRA®E is.L` 6,y�36 w� 1755,New a Road - JOSA Ngegno L$ 5 1 p,Z.1 MaNWck,Neer YDIk 11952 - rdre sunwya-su6dnas.Dne-Ste Plans- ConsWc6on Layout THE E2Is1WCE OF RIGHT OF w,,n (631)298.1986(631)29&2651 F6tc PHONE(631)727-2090 F..(631)727-1727 AND/OR EASEMIa-OF RECORD,IF mww condonengmeenng mm ( ANY,NOT SHOwN ARE NOT GOARANIEED OFFICES LOCATED AT UAIUNG ADDRESS 1586 Main Road Po Be.16 JamasporL Ne»York 11947 J.-PaL Na»York 11947 yF'§� Pods N� 5 Ate 761 MMN AOS `ac W� BJ C PR MISES a6-- I I R• 25 Srp q8e Ill 0p'9 N 61' 7E "E wo a KEY MAP a N 6 Zp3 6 uNf slip os SCALE 1"=600' g O� Opi2' \ an. s'x �L CULTIVATED FIELD e 8 o0" � Yp 69 ' Z0 �9 rte <J,S83'S 6 , P� moo, p FINAL MAP OF a \ \ TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLDING COMPANY SOUTH BROWN OPEN SPACE i TOTAL= 1,110,972 aq.ft. o,p`, SITUATE 15' DRIVEWAY= 14,154 sq.ft. �__,. AREA WITHOUT DRIVEWAY= 1,096,818 sq.0. ORIENT \t `\ CULTIVATED REM ,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK X= \ S.C. TAX No. 1000-18-06-17.3 SCALE 1� 605,' 5 20 APRIL 1, 2011 a �h JUNE 23, 2011 YEILD MAP APRIJANUARY 19016SCDHS 02K P RLNG -OCTOBER 28, 2016 REVISE TEST HOLE LOCATION - JULY 7 2017 SCDHS COMMENTS t \ - aup AREA= 1,172,556 sq, ft. \ 26.918 cc. el SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES NOTES• GREAT RIVER,NY 1. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. 1929 DATUM \ c a EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS:.:ea CULTIVATED FIELD c �• EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: ----•-"_�_, ...,-___,-,_� 2. ZONING USE DISTRICTS: Date ,` R-80 = 683,462 R-120 = 489,094 sq. ft. 3.WETLAND AREA =27,147 sq, ft. 4.THERE ARE NO SEWAGE DISPOSAL OR WATER SUPPLY \t FACILITATES ON THE PROPERTY This Is to certify that the proposed Realty Subdivision or Development far in he ,nth a total of ml w R - ;i ,wL• TYPICAL PLOT PLANS approved an the bove date Water Supplies and Saw age Disposal acilities m st co farm to nstmcbon stondarda In effecat the time 1 � - - (NOT TO SCALE) r construction and are subject to separate permits pursuant to those of ords This app-1 hall Its,v Ild only (the amity subdrvlslon/ 'b oYu ) PROPERTY 11NE development m p I duly fllatl Ith the County Clerk thin one year1-^ of this date Consent is hereby rgiven for the riling f this op on which this endorsement appears the Office of the County_Clerk n �=Z'' 800 ' PRIVATE cc a dance with the visions of the Public Health Law and the v '�R'r),O WELL Suffolk County Samtory�ade `•� 9. Walter Dawydlak,P EL \ 14\ `�•�'4 BUILDING Director,D,N.Nn or Environmental Duality 0s til \ \?y,\ y 2a A 4 \tt t'\ \ \ -.. e3 15 36'TOTAL \ \ ,p SEPTIC \ `\ f0 ANK \ a LEACHING F \ \ POOL t / I \ POOLEXPANSION iot W \ IL °� ��bg81„ \'\ R \'L •S�, •\ .tiy°° LVL ROAD I `\� I�ryty„� Ilk ail4 TEST HOLE OO LOAM PROPOSED WELL ,tP TO BE TESTED BYO e SCDHS O t`t �l. 70 'i TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM °y \ (NOT TO SCALE) .L�1 t`t \08 y 6RTYSVDI C�FCP,ra. , tWVRB TCD n . Rih p* r.nHl,lrt,fl Gfv4k � tl' NP eIFP INN- ""Pal CWkR i� 'i!a ,><'1 gAtHn CIT a „{C RO {^Gnk511 W+4^E /`V � ---------_- 86 WAlELT310 PRESAbi Ra _ , ,, .,� flrlfP I'DFfN rtR,;!tiff ria J A„1 IkJN�Os'"GR in 4RAlk ` / EL30 U R.'d i s,-..mss....-......T.-.,. / 1 ..........'..._...,.._.......,. -.-...-_.,..I-...-____-__.�.(..._,.. '\ IVa CIPi} 2n"rte 4� 'yT, x1� .... �CA41At4-1/2'41:._:_., NIM.r•Ja `! _ _____.___ xF.x'i.-.)_ I LOT 1 rA ,. .........-,..,,.-,.....�.......{iFT.0 PTC,111"Mo`41l b ? 1 t y WATER R, 'w.T:;.r ' C,\\ y 40,004 sq.ft. , \ SAND&GRAVEL {H JERT_., r� A^;u��. ""•W.m "^'^^»--_. f' �'-" hr,, l)k '\ '�` 1t ' `` IN, 11Iua i15,00 'To '2a TEST HOLE WITNESSED BY SCDHS ON 10/6/16 IN WATER ENCOUNTERED 65•BELOW GRADE PROPOSED HTESTOLE ,d CU ,MU10 LTNA`\t FIF1D ttt / " \\,ilia y, ,Oa I vllN Nl�nly rAVx GIF- Ik I,DDO OMIDNS, + I k 1 ANe 6' x t'Offe' 7 `4 lTrIc`+dAN ol,ANA hifA 011.'Rl:4tiA iirtgNirl p.i EOC 45i Ai:9 PxT4 (, ^a ti K4 iiVV'I:NEfin FiNAII 6e A i{I�lIIAIM1I of d",A TPF Tn'fnN 14 Or N°ANO A On. iH GRFCSS C✓i', � I 4 .6*AI III NTiOM AVD To"' LL O0{RAIN PfR{rO`Q"'IU 4%,n'!AaFL�e,D TORI`¢a�:Go Pal �I_ °'e `t '� J p My JOII 1 CNAte N{5{N{O ap TMT Inn TALI IR wAffffh*lr p,Tin eE FTU:TANII-Nkl,PV INrTMoo AI Le12i.III A4,un."" (wlTt n-ie,SCuro',k P-we) fN A NlifeALM:"�H ih RFD 9F rGMPAFTtII'ANq OR PYA Cr+vF4 / ,-�-.-111 l�l -' f •@ y P A IO'IThi 0ISTANEE PUK01 6FFDG TNIf MID rQ05F=NTLI.Rn WUINe.krf I' F11 ` �(I - r AL O -xv_;--.-�.c �- - .-.-'.. -.e-�e--«^.=f.-erg: .-.--._,�_. .,..F... � `\ •~' 1 NR,d IVV 6f!,cN'Ni R\51eS1 M t6J w,N•r{yhnLl IVF„4 \' J WCM'NQ>i 491 II,?.DUu¢CIAILi CI/x!4L4G4S ftk `nU Cv"iINiSC(U2 EG Y) � YYY- �, ,illi •�/ L OD'FIN 1`nU nc O"RiffAl'RL+Nr,^.R44P MIORT1r,OR rGk+.) ! `\, e n'G' -,p4TnN,-L V.IFTN tCatNmG 11--%AV1,W11FO III,YWJ.OF 1! -,t D -I i O \\, ,LVL 1 N M min P-1 Drrnrin AL LEAON'NO WL$3wµBE WeWAM, t AV a xn DISN'Wi,PEEEN 11.Lr,c-O LS"I SCrG , W" ` O 7 \ 0 0. 1, SUBDIFISION REPORT(SOUTH BROWN) xON-BUIMOi wIIDAOLL eA1LUulEO DEVELOPMENT` DLVROPYOR REMIND OPEN AGPRmnwlE SUBDIVISION TYPE TOTAL AREA i �'S tl ARG AREA Ira YIELD nF1D AREA, SPACE LOT SUE -.. - 15.57 Oa(X-60) 16.87 x 43.660 x OLS Bo.000•7.1 •rp STANDARD 26.91 ae. 0.W as 10.71 ae.W-200) 10 71X4!.560%D.0.1%200,000.2.0 0 2�1y"a,�as W 2915.77-0 so •1All q.ft /E / •/ 4 25.21 a0 TOTAL TOTAL.9.2 �r '�' 75/75 13.77 -60) 16A7 X 43,660/m,aa0.0.e 20.26 as x e a. m6•• CULTIVATED FIELD T7 xe.91 ae. 0.0.7 as to.72 -200 1071 x AA60/2o0A00. 2.3 I.x an.2.7 2x29 as-ea7 ao `� ilVL CO SERVATION O0'(R ) .fis7 oa 19.72 as •114.178 p.fl. °• 10.29 as TOTAL TOTAL c 10.6 10.87 as(A-60) 15A7 x AA60/50,000.&5 E.a x Aber x pa 4 � BO/80 I"x OAO. 26.18 as X 0.20 26.29 Oa-5,16 wa / LVL Cp}�SERVATION 20.92 m. 0.63 as 1071 as(A-100) 11171 X13.660/w0,000• 2.3 6,15 as v 21 OS as •67.151 w4 H. 20.29 ea 7mAL TOTAL•tae t` 3 1 � I hereby certify that the water supply(s) and/or sewage disposal system(s) for this project e41 were designed by me or under my direction Based upon a careful and thorough study of / PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM the soil, site and groundwater conditions, all lots, as proposed, conform to the Suffolk County STANDARDS FOR TITLE SURVEYS AS ESTABLISHED Department of Health Services'construction standards In effect as of this date °, 07 BY THE L I A LS AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED FOR SUCH USE BY THE NEW YORK STATE LAND 66 /AL TITLE ASSOCIATION John J Condon, PE NYS LIc # 081912 NYS be No 50467 •l'd 1 UNAUnXIP¢m ALTAATON OR �JL ^G. Nathan Taft Corwin III HN72 F THE iss !7� _ THE NEW YDRx STALE Land Surveyor THEU"H6� S MAPNot w` /AL THE TSE s M SHILL s INOT SEAL.SI TOOR BE m SELL SWU-NOf BE CDNSDFAm j N BE A VAap TRUE COPY Condon Engineering P.C. can6-.B N.-D HEREaN-RuN Successor To 6tanityty J Maksen,Jr LS 7 ONLY m ME PERSON FOR WHOM THE SORver Josaph A Ingegno LS 775$$IgShea Road IS PREPWem AN a BFNALF TO TIE Two Survtys-Subd-Rs- Sde Plans- Construction Layout TOTE aaNPPNY aammu HE OOK M AND Ma1755 NsYI a Rc 17952 Tr-E C INslnunox DBTn iExME AND PHONE(631)727-2090 Fax(631)727-1727 (631)29&7986(637)29&2657 Fax TO THE C-rRApNSTMAREUEND E NET NTRUISmuelE. OFFICES LOCATED AT INKLING ADDRESS WWwoordonenglneenngcom THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS ' 1566 Mom Road PO Rox 16 AAND/N9T SHOWNENTS ARE FNDTCORD.GMEIF TEED Jameapart New York 11947 Jamesport,New York 11947 a�a'Ile FINAL MAP OF TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLDING COMPANY NORTH DYER SITUATE THE NORM =� ORIENT US TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 9 PENISES ME CIRCLE SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK of S.C. TAX No. 1000-17-04-16 aqd° SCALE 1"=100' Q MAY 19, 2008 JUNE 23, 2011 YIELD MAP Wpm JUNE 27,2011 REVISED YIELD MAP APRIL 3, 2013 SKETCH PLAN /pys JANUARY 19, 2016 SCDHS FILING 3 OCTOBER 28, 2016 REVISE WELL LOCATIONS JULY 7, 2017 SCDHS COMMENTS TOTAL AREA = 921,631 ft. gx° 21.15 ac.. KEY MAP UPLAND AREA = 670,061 .q. ft. 15.38 ac. SCALE 1"=600' - WETLANDS AREA= 251,570 sq. ft. w 5 77 ac. • o' i 1 l'01yG ls�� DWELLING r USES PRIVATE WELL TYPICAL PLOT PLANS sl \ i (NOT TO SCALE) 1 , i �^15 l 1 III i t\ I l tl PROPERTY UNE PRNATE - 1 1 I1'I t \ I i i WELL CpA,�51,0µ' `8 \�ao ` 5 � ; '4BNLDING R�0 ss'pN a. NOT TOTAL, 75ApF!•11tP >< - 427 s NN.,I,eD TOTALF3S7,777 eq.ff. / 6 UPLAN0.106,207 aq,/1: // - SEPTIC WEflANDS=751,570•aq.ff. // DWELLING / \@ e - >"q3S^^ //° LOT 4 USES PRIVATE WELL / - 1/� 35,SS2 eq.ff. 'Y �\ LEACHING POOL ^`'@ ^• PROPOSED^t USES PRIVATE WELL 50%EXPANSION / SCDHS 7EST-WELL^'�- a POOL / q@LOT 5 / 31,740 1,q if N c / - 7 'Ja• -- 1I6..+/�/�" ROAD TEST HOLE#2 ' `,, . •/JA ! _-^ - '� (LOCATED BY SCDHS) SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES VACANT o I , top' o• GREAT RIVER NY �- ----------- \` // �' w VACANT Date 770. Thi.is to certify that the proposed Really Subd,A.I n or Development ---------OPEN SPICE for in the 182,378 eq.'1f. / ��" \ i o-53 wdh a total of lot w N 1749'30.- ^-^e---` 1 1 \ 1 pp-,,d on lha bo..date W ter Supplies d Sewage Disposal 60.72 V + Qo.•3; \ ,we Fa<ilitles m t conform t° n traction standards°in effect of the time itt atandardyuctiTheanad are I1V1.ll,I 90ild f0tl'f the eolt°Osubd Ton/ DWEWNC t 1 0o q I y ps row Y y / USES PRIVATE WF1C� f to \vt \ development ire d,N Nod ,Nx Ne County Clerk within one year \ Tv �`N` ♦ \` of this date Consent 1 hereby given!or the nGngt.o/this 1,p on LOT I // ,�V'I �� which dance rdith the ntt Opp-io a lof tthe Publi cHealth Low anld the i -`32,345 q.1`. %/ "OPEN SPACN LOT E`, w�``\\� VACANT Suffolk CountySanitaryCode 53.879 eq.fl. ``.ir`' \\. Walter Dawydl°k,PC m ce // �- iso -. \ D—td Division of Enwronmentcl Ouahly t+ H `J g, �/ W m f • DWEWNG USES PRIVATE WELL 738• LOT 2 t / 33,713 eq.ff I hereby certify that the water supply(s) and/or sewage disposal system(.) for this project PPOPDSED / y TEST HOLE/1 were designed by me or under my direction Based upon a careful and thorough study of SCDHs TEST'WELL/// (LOCATED BY SCDHS) the sail, site and groundwater conditions, all lots, as proposed, conform to the Suffolk County h ;// /61,• Department of Health Services construction standards In effect as of this date )21 // y DO 11 ,} ; DWELLING N 711'.o USE 5 PRIVATE WELL LOT 8 \y OPENSPICE 87.703 1,q. l / J John J Condon, PE NYS LIc # 081912 TEST HOLE#1 TEST HOLE#2 "Jk,��. `�I w ELV8 DO ELVO DO 1[CFS01L TOPSOIL 10 12 Y � Q \\ y\ J Saw MY 'ANoaaLneaw \ E'er• NOTES. ' 1. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. 1929 DATUM EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS:+IP? ----------- Me ----------- ]aRWAIFATAB(EEL 11D EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS:---------s¢'•------- WATERTAJXE 2. ZONING USE DISTRICT: R-80 WATERNSINDBGRAVEL EL-71 WATERNSWIDSGRAVFL 3.WETLAND AREA= 251,573 sq ft. I 410 Nd TEST HOLE WITNESSED BY SCDHS TEST HOLE WITNESSED BY SCDHS ON 10/5/16 ON 10/5/18 SUBDIVISION REPORT(NORTH DYER) GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED AT GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED AT SUBDIVISION TYPE TOTAL MEA NDN-BUILDABLE BUILDABLE ED CALCULATDEYDOp.— DEVELOPMENT REQUIRED OPEN MPIN.1"VE 35'BELOW GRADE 38'BELOW GRADE MFA MG LOT YILTD You MEA SPACE LOT SME 15 j1,1,115 X 040 1536 1111.060 aa. 4F1 a It STANDARD 21.15 a 677 1,e. 1536 1,v. 1636 X 41,580 X 065/80,000.711 7 6.16 w v 9.21 1,e. ^111,768 119•/l. CONSERVATION 3115 vv 5771,11 18361,v 1536 X 43.680/80,000 a 63 0.3 X am a 21 IS SwB s° )�0'u 1538 ac -6,64 // 11x1,11 CONSERVATION 21.15 1,v. fin 1,11 1538 1,11 1536 X43360/80,000 n 8,3 63 X OAO=3.! 1307 Xm� 1538"1231 ac7 O1, a 3j,81I p fl TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM HlW>[ h+V d4gE0 (NOT TO SCALE) r eco, PE"A"U"Fom \,N\RRr CrniR 'dw LP;h'ai,1\\\[RTN"IR N eCECI PRD<P ^r+•r.R{air:& r"I'P I NUI m;n$MLP mor^^�\ / ASI vaW'.'\'N^.+ML 4'N I-dl..-.^ ....y..,_.,. .,I',�,...i �+ - ArptiErnFa PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR TITLE SURVEYS AS ESTABLISHED a'�-llw I "T ��'""`! "•�-'7 �; k'i' BY THE L I A L S AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED waTu FOR SUCH USE BY THE NEW YORK STATE LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION • 1,111101IN MileAIV)IiLAr.00 IR I'M G+U'"' :,CUIh&511 51w1 INl4 0.MNIIUM CM!PPd`3RT 8iY5td;M LY.�tk=PY n1 do WYE, 4 all fi4\'rtHCyq9 4'Vll Df A M lidll[I Or A`,ILL,RS:hN•84 Vy d•A1O A Kw 11+RIXS(`S;S lY lG 1'.Allk INDPM ALA IDP>rN41°OM+m RPRan,¢EvlV TO RQS'W k'APry to noRY CP JOO l el4,IDINTI r+u1,l 1,6 3t AI.fO pn RN1 ill.TaNn IS\ta51R1WiT �}j 1 I 8_� ) 6,1111 0('Ni IANI,9Hd'.0 FAIN:IA0.0 At tML IN At NKNIOM(hTIN+[1411 YaaErAlICC V'at/A7 nL'1 i( l ri i NYS Uc No 50467 ON A <d F'1NIMUM.11—CYNICd V.01 1'O\'wyi[O SMA PfPA OPAYLL e Ata'mn M4IC MR.TFN 1-111-11 TAN. A- lwGF—.1c jj- --_�-�� Jth'!0 vz?R u,OORNOROas"ISA°"°""F Nathan Taft Corwin 1II enox iwo nNnis rsw 'wmrs rATc T.'uw t M 'w lEa�"'aC_(SnS'Le�Stta0_peoa svL sN+ll Nor eE ca1mCFRm Land SurveyorSI orCondon Engineering,P.C. CORES F [ p�OR A 1755 SI 3bee Road onz, VWO TPOE COP! ra+us:A Ee�,a"a MathtudL NswYolk 11952 e[RnrxAlwns maaTED_DON sNw.Rim successor To Stanley J Isaksen Jr L5 ?VAhIXP Mt',1 N.0 m PE Utf;tieUO!EO Ur PYENST E:CnYJMLE41.o\i'aEiS('DR Q'gnu A ONLY TO�TIE PFRBON FOR WHOM INE SUR°EY Joseph A In9e9no LS UxPn.x seav v ws•,• ¢�mury a.D;a;sw.>s (631)29&1966(631)298-2651 FaX m,AND ox NIS Rows To INE +L m£Ps vut5 to OF PAk'NSt Rluu"JK40 ecna'+^C:•'(•W—0, www Condonen Ineenn win �aE IP/Lrr.OO.ERNIONIAL Acww dw Me Surveys-S.Miismw-SA,Pins- Co bvb oo Layout 4 A 1C N-L'i:Y PP'ACCK LH'16.A i KAc Axn y1,;y LA 5»yU Cd\tCKfa[dD 9 9 DWa m5'nMIOH AND ^AY 0+a•,,(\S\Ye st'o—All teXi• roC"g.Wt c bwtin?rTo—or—i=C- Nr USD- PHONE(631)727_2090 F°s(631)72DRESS G V P a teetXSC 6CYnU,'\*+LC lF4•t1Mr N(iS YV^SE'"+.TY.5'eb1 Fi W.•iwsp TNnel ilE OA7CE5 LOGIFD A7 A4tNNG ADDRESS ME MST... OF RIGHT OF WAYS 1586 Main Road PO Box 16 AND/oR EASEMENT.OF RECORD.IF JamaOart Naw York 11947 JameeporL New York 11947 ANY,NOT a.OWN AR NOT aUARMTEED l THE NORTH ?o _ J :ay °E°�a •° "�'[([ ao "� �O dtal `O2 m THE CIRCLE �i- �d a. TEST HOLE#1 TEST HOLE#2 a' =ter/S U 6 ry 6�a MAIN ROAD(NYS Rte 25) e. 58044E ELMO 00 EL 82 OA 40• WY 1+` ao TOPSOIL TOPSOIL 25740• `/ daS to 1a _ _t s7sia20 fa #I r a g \ _`- _�` 142,5J• RB S66' �68 y3 sattSAIA)eGRAM sattSMmaGRAV¢ MIS S• 7 E 7jB6°p� h'°a J `rtes KEY MAP DAN 4 vF SSg~ e°b SAtal6&GRNVE. 601¢EdT SCALE 1"=600' 3' • `'\� t, sObpF � w/RDae ----------- 118 aAkty� r \ S� e WATERIN DAH( --- - ?S, �s 15QATM O S4D6GflA�` FINAL MAP OF 91• TUTHILL OYSTERPONDS HOLDING ??. TEST HOLE WITNESSED BY SCDHS TEST w TNESSED BY SCDHS COMPANY — SOUTH DYER ON 10/5/16 ON 10/5//5/16 GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED AT GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED AT 15'BELOW GRADE 17'BELOW GRADE SITUATE °S� SSS ORIENT ?6 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 3 'P, J SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK JV �m g'< L•"- -7s J•F a°g \t J a �` S.C. TAX No. 1000-17-06-14.2 SCALE 1"=100' MAY 19,2016 REVISE NOTES 5Q b0.1� MAY 31,2016 SCDHS RUNG 1io I LOT 6 '^. OPEN SPACE --- . 2„2 :hb^0 doh JUNE 1,2016 SCDHS FILING�+• 1 /' 4 .y`V O•\t � OCTOBER 28,2016 REVISED WELL LOCATIONS • , X C) y n�o •� JULY 7,2017 SCDHS COM TOTAL=1.319625 q. ft. MENTS s 1 i - UPLAND=681,464 sq. ft if �.O'd ,,, AREA - 1,539,579 s 11 TYPICAL PLOT PLANS I; I v°� (TO TIE uNES) 35 344 ac q• WETLAND=638,161 sq. f}. l OS 0 a x (NOT TO SCALE) t �SS• 4. fS 6•f •NQ( 1 ri I ! '?g9'(g9y, `B pe`a PA'Nq FC PROPERTY UNE • I \1/ DO NO WELL BJ• T ---�`20 1YF(( SUFFOLK COUNTY GREAT}MEET NY HEALTH SERVICES SCDHS TEST WELL o° PRIVATE 1 3 /{� WELL 4 ro ¢ 3F 0y( 38,271 q.ft. `V� s PRry a / a po \ i` ` '• �Fk mss. HOLE �ZalA1DING • 2N ' , ' a i\ Y fa: ^ ))a• b0 L °'^q^y^e T (LOCATED BY SCDHS) 0 y 20' II'TOTA This is to certif that the d Real Subdn,,e n or D—I. t °ban C/' 1! \ ' Q�^0yi 186 b1�p N FS Pn�yF�•y,� f 0 6' s__- forwith.y Propose ly pmfhe e / ��•� 4° J4�'/ �^ ° I 0 aSETmC pproved o the hove dole Water Suppes and Sewage Dsposal ` • a a a , '�\ i PROPOSED 3 ry, 9p / s`sq i Af0( Faaribes M co form to sWct standards effect et the 4me (//jJJt / 'j �Q (constm,V and are ,b,.a to separate pennds reu—s .t to those • ee0^u1 Ymsu 1 SCDHSITESr WELL ryh ; �B qJp� I v.� b �B' stantlartls This approval hall be valid H d the ally subdrv,si0n/ 11 ya LEACHING �1 development m p is duly filed ,tl the County Clerk wdhn one year I 0f this dale Consent hereby green for the tiling f Nis ap on i PROPoSED I fj J ""r0 Q� �L t / which this en'Co ent appears in the Office of iha County Clerk n f SCDHS TEST WELL Ja. U SOS E70'ANSION rdance iN the P._ions of the Publ.c Health Law and Ne POOL ' • I f ^b / to ty. A 66' Suffolk County Sanitary Code • a t I / � / yq f f , •j 4 a R«^� -.°Af • I / , i PROPOSED JB• f �-p��q by " '�N f a 4 I a A5• ;SCDHS TEST WELL ' "Ae„r^AT^°'•,,. ROAD ^�99)�OTQ �7T Dne Ci.1 D,wee.of Enn�ronma tat oua6ty 3 e 3 /� 'f7J• LSFS PRFk/'w,o I hereby certify that the water supply(s) and/or sewage disposal system(s) for this project g' \ BS(O 3 4'9TF were designed by me or under my direction Based upon a careful and thorough study of S?/f`y. �O•; 1�^ R2'(( the soil, site and groundwater conditions, all lots, as proposed, conform to the Suffolk Count 7S a • . $ I 'YS, /`Pq / ,n ^.a Department of Health Services construction standards in effect as of this date ;Z;- TATHOLE s2 O (LOCATED s DHS) �'-- 4 TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM BrJ 'Q, TO (NOT TO SCALE) h '°•e ! 76 `/� 4�� .EP rev` A fJCnnx S<i-x .1. • °AjF ^O tV ?, 4( a r�°°�"�°r7 , 7S• ' uses 0*,, -14 T/f ah -y'•.i,,[ b�EEtt ✓3rP, �PL�CSPI-4 11,� CCaI0,Dt le cssE 31'w. !/g D k s_i:,PSE ic"•,•.� -cP`a�w a�cE *T L SfiS Ty �--"•.U44 i FS � P't:rtL 1/a/•` - t' 54 John J Condon, PE NYS Le # 081912 4 y'Jti�6 -� Stat. s �M-.,,' IBJ Tie Line d oe�4AF [ ,C Iw:%v T 0 N89'07'16°W 31955' `vf w� 7�•� tree `� I � I Q ,apAerS L SEPTIC TANK.(11 - PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM a e `i n°'dEiaa� i s ffsaA 'm'i5 s`f n:treo+r. ImoSTANDARDS FOR TITLE SURVEYS AS ESTABLISHED 1 BY THE L I A L S AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED micPErE rs,.c..o,c A rr�v�.f cc n.—znva=,cr—-a az u.r•. -�L � � FOR SUCH USE BY THE NEW YORK STATE LAND s cuL Ix✓J.��.s:...,,sa r rman.+..r r A-a s�scrr¢s:<r n•<+:..anw a a:+-ss a.- � f( _ � ALL m,s,Ec•-ccu v„-,rr�wE ew.;ar,xcraau a w -ss-v..�r.J s¢u c.xa cs �+{, E TITLE ASSOCIATION TV •7.A0.Y i E"YL es'SEAIif:0 T%.AF Te✓TP.T 2 sarERWf' �r L--( ^'•"`x F F a.K^-TL Tan OT S 42 e:fr--, 1 ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N G V D 1929 DATUM +.. EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS:a'^ EX STING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS --------50--------- bq, 2. ZONING USE DISTRICT R-80 ,� LEACHING POOL 3. WETLAND AREA = 636,161 sq ft. rEx.rs2 4. THERE ARE NO EXISTING SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES = r6T� ` " NYS U, No 5046 z.Thi'a:"xcs.�T rrs�s's:,z.-;<cx,--.P�.r;7.�.rAs�=ts•Trxi ON EXISTING PROPERTY. •�Derr smz-r o,�,,sac Oars watDlt° • 3.•:L UTIEkT S.wL BE G FiETCi P?JvSil°La: faP rlsdcy SUBDIVISION REPORT(SOUTH DYER) s iz'e ff`a�;c r:x rwaava � „. ,, ; Nathan Taft Corwin III SUBDIVISION TYPE TOTAL ARTA NON-BUILDABLE -us" GLCUUIED DEVELOP. DEVELOPYCNT REQUIRED OPEN APPROXIMATE 0 Aa P.;m 067-z eE" N Pa.LAhtl'O:crt?c fg),Y�iG r+:xd a�LE m fFNVT.vC•?. IREA IRFA IDT YIELD YIELD AREA SPADE IDT SRE Land Surveyor 11.65 Oc feE9No) 19 it u Oc xae D b 19 u ac 080 ac 50.065 %Om/ STANDARD 35J4 Oa f3B aw'°�'m giro 19.13 I. fit 5%0,560%0.85/60,000-90 R =77] =11 66 a = eq 560 Condon Engineering,P.C. 1755 Sgsbee Road sa°aeesor T°J1oexl A I.,-Jr I.S. LS 75/75 11.65 ac OmU+al 1915%47.560/60,000=10 6 1815 ac %035 19 4!a<.-1 BS ac CO SERVATION W u Oe 126 Oc mW'im ro Awe 190.1 l0 6 z o 25=x] =485„ 1458 v0 =8%508 ey II Mathtuds New Yak 11952 p 9e9ro TNe SLrvayn-5ubdmvans-Sita Pons- LOnsWcbOn layout n-00-' (631)298.1986(631)298-2651 Fax PHONE(631)727-2090 Fuz(631)727-1727 ha 80/60 1466 ac I 0 OP 13 ae ac - au uA00.om/• www candanangkneeag 1nm CO SERVATION 28 Oc( �m wAc 19 0 ac 19 0 x 15,560/60.000=1 O 6 106 X oto-424 19=3.88%Pc 030 191!=15 55 3 Oc06 =SJ.s02 sq fl OT710ES LOCATED AT WLUNG ADDRESS 1556 Men ReadP 0 Bo.16 J_pet.Neu York 11947 Jerii.;,e.New York 11947 27-289-3