Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReeve, Harold R & Sons i 1)Yr•VT•+IiEQ 4T.aM.T.0.-Cr iC>�:J��C]l5.v0..nC d Sl^nM]-�Of]wC..:.'•T•(ST.TC EA,C.nQ..Ur(:)PSruCES 4.0w.ARD•n(fu HIYf.T�'. TO!a CT .-3 TZIE''•af ! .W-C rI1MOA awG.K cc,m.f uSET i7 CSi.R 15n.1TPY t ni�r f�(Tl'_nOr K iEr 25 IC Cfr-d IMS 011.Mf- wCT.flu[r'r YE Uv]7,iwv{gl S •✓S St...•eu wE•r.+ .e"-f]•+ +.IL.lr C+r i 1U r•.C..W•`+��•"'w Ty_L-l�•r-•...REQ••V W M.L-F IJ I-C MLC CIM.r•-Gu�k7n..Cn Tr_.incl..4i SwC.rG wSn N'Wr u5T0 rt1EW..+J T.M.S."!Cs d M ILHDwG IrST+LTO. CC'r N1C.nJ..S.n[.�Ci iR.y4[..i'S TC wL'nW,.L�w]n LThS J1 Su.SCLtMi 0+•.015. (])n-L LoC.T]n d.CILS Irt ArnC T.x.t;:SI;.CC5900.'_(r1 S+J�•QwL'Yl.nC N •�C'I1'i5 � sy �g1 `Y�y`,• tam Q �.p ��l� //�'� • TS Qp l� TIE LINE ALON5 �� '•` 855 .T �lrQ" 0 /,-PROXIMATE H&H � A� �. +6-35 T9A49.76 N. �rQ' R-4�t0 HATEF t AR< �� - i \ a C a �y 1. 6 7 S.�\ SDBT 7 Q` In �JQ O^ I +10.5 10 R O k-3 rPS \(Q �S +8 3G L7/e O 8 5 - R-40 ,��.'��r� b � � � / • 675CVO RI7 /` Vl/• / .; , +6.86 /.� qty ^r 4 / / / +9.44 �, 99 O"/ X125'/ lid �,•'8,,• 2 [/ / 6' '/ +8.67 / - O �� - I `v / / % / +1070 1 <.1X. �4 \p,7 13 lcp RD 7 17 \� �,� /r .� +9.04 / +9 55 �Oi S r� oQj l T,' SQ L/ +12.43 ;lam He 1 `.l�j•- /mss��tB.�� -B- +9.i1 / I +1070 'R o '��, i' / / / TOTAL = 42,8Q4 5F +1225 BUILDABLE = 40, 17-BF 70'W 4434' / / �r '� 93 '20'W 1010.42' !' .37 +1267 / +a.sa / Q pp4� /•��' '/ +629// /1+10.25 /�/ +'133 �ry b�,� +5.3E // +13 e h���� 7 i/i'/ 17.63.9+ Q 4• /, +8.82 CO L/ Q) J ) \ �Q,`to •" +f,�94 / / TOTAL = 42,162 5F �� %' WETLANDS = 2,156 5F LO . MAP. . ..... MAP ��91 �g8 _- BUILDABLE _ 40,006 5F a� . 1° = 6001 ,�'� / / 8ss / +12.56 .,ryry ;` , ° ,�t'y e +827 f Boa - 1 w ) +13.45 6 \ /% • ,'N� r t8.00 / -,GQ 4� lk MTLAND5 1,C114 5F JUN �° 2015 0-� �; %+7.D6 ?6� \\ ----% \\ ,ryo >T mss. / ,,, P 0 ): +I6 93+10.73 3 8 4• 6 0 (` TOTAL = 42,152 5F \ � ,'.J °� t�. �, ��J"y� / U r I = +10.96 . BUILDABLE = 40 55 5F \\ ++12.60 \ +16.7&10.95 +10.13 :/ QST 12L' \� %�Y' f Z) 1 , 3D g� i "vim V 44 / 1 16. S 4e 0 +929 +8.90 1692 .613 7 / ! 0.,14 ir / \ 5 +8.621 lQ\ +8.45 i .1 11170 0 °O 1 yJ- +8.701 � _ \10.19 ry� 1_ c � \2.9R \\ 15.41 1 s dor _ _ \� �� 7.7,�� _ - _�T���� 0_t��0 \ Q �tto.o - �\ at\9 ,► h0 , }) +6.09 +7.53 +7.58 , , 733 _ \ 9r ! 7i \ , . 9, !/� tr \e� 154 1 !� .�Cr /.�II'f.�•. `' b Q10 I 1 92 483 400 DYfO ,A--Rt—I-,d,New York 11901 /.• 1 /" --i-rte— Vd' ` '_ Z. ` , 'xs> . ��'.\ �� tet 631'13'13�youn�r651 l7�cm O' 4;n 3 sneer x 9 bltlic� 1jbltltc� TU x �� Honord rL You.+g Lmdswey°r -- I•°. O i l�Qy=�{,•r / o \" �', \ \ j e TFaino,a w°1 Froroeelorul B, � vcvgbs E Adar�s.FroPesslo�wl E+g w°r / 5 o RVert a Tess.A.I-ItV e s "� 1d �Lb ` SR N • ' QeO''e"1.4'". /�l/�. I e� \��so •'°�. 'N `lb •'�n s,� "�y .rCj �'A> ,�1 „� �`� /�!e/a DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA 4 CALCULATIONS ',•1 I I •'`- 1 '(•s// -__---- '� I A.AREA OF TRIBIITAFY(SFJ @ -'•L I I 's \\ 1 ! ____` �1-;�-- N4'�' 'OO E —I ' I R A. RAINFALL(FTJ •--T •tr .fill, `1„ _r•_�— / ♦a I. 0 >� • \/, I - C COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF N45'122N OMP ELN=1699 •' R ,.�:.;w p G�•3f� _ _ +y '•U 15.21 Ogl' ° \ ''y4;• 13`�• HP STA.i•5132� ' •" - -=.� ; AREA •O X6.59Ra-• '>�Js \ rl sn SB'oc'!N i a�Til yl_ -s 4'�• \. 1•• 5UTAR I �' SQ..' 20-F ]03 .lil s•°. 1� 5T R1H=9 Q� r �. < N43SI2 ------ ----''' T»' _ �° �:.._ •'t'r 1 4 :71 _'Ib50 5F b' 1 1�5tz J01 'yo k ,SIB -6s•*' _- - Td—ar° sTn--�OHo00 •e I I ul ° � `?' _ -D- .� '^ RE��'\!IEYty�- — _ `If/ RIM.14 L= _ I r�ir� • �•__-' IN49 1] E 'paN 296 00' ' `i r�� IE•9 B4 {; � AS-HALT //� 1�P•� 2055 SF x 2/12 x AO " °' - `ppOP _Z„WA1E♦\. _- aaa 1 8 a� 1 BB d(; °� Won.' 2 ,F — )POOLS B >° I GB•I I I' f.O 14/ - = F I =343 GF 7G B'O%5'DESP I' STA=0.3000 t._5 — NODDED,CLEARED t SEEDED. I I „erAi Wd.oiw r,IQ° W DRAINA6= I 1.10.0 9 JUN �tl O 5,TA SF x 2/12 x 015 O Cr G ° is\• 1 lny nOW Or formerly EASEMENT I IE=IOLO v u 111 o TOTAL REQUIRED 4 • °o I N Lero J.Heyllger I6'orl•HDPE ' °.//\ .I Qy _'{Pia y FI PEe WO Dq 6/Ofd, , _ >> 02)FOO �/rL•1 O \ I \ __ e g>r"N_s (3)B DIA x 5 LEEP POOLS_ ¢34Sr PROVIDED VO USE LEACHINS F 'A' t -0•�D.a1\Il.>��-�°'>e _ .II(e,I I II I I".I�I4 pI\�I \1 �9, ce,�l `€:aWAu I / TR1,AREA I no or formerly AREA=51.345 SF 11 Karen Ann Clark b „ :�L AnthonyRutkow5kiI RECUIRED VOLUME - ASPHALT, PLAN GREEK VIEW LANE °26 Sr 4 z 2/12 x NODDED,CLEARED t SEEDED. Seale 1'=50' 42001 SF x 2/12 x O 15=1.052 CF TOTAL REQUIRED-]596 CF PROVIDED VOLUVE" USE L - HIGH POINT ELEV•1699 f FIELD 8' 071 B'DIA.x 53'DEEP POOLS=2108 GF M16H POINT STA•1.5132 PVI STA-1.50 05-1.1j PVI ELN.1tu B.Co RIN=1419 qty AD g� AD°A934T IE•IOAO M"•1947 Z Z STA•4.6935 K°]53T52 'S."2 STA•000 RIM=14.13 E=994 ILI bV QK / ELN 9• 00 Z srA.a.sBTs .1 I SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION QB•21 n n r F• --II / - ac• RIM°9.00 n N O r' L4 /, •I HEREBY CERTIFY TNAT THIS MAP WA5 PREPARED UTILIZING C IE=510 j � BOUNDARY AND TOPOGKAFHIGAL SURVBr5 MADE BY U5 AND/OR _ 1 W ; m 20 J) II u-0. D,-0 / avER GM DIRsvnoN W lew• PAvBENT NEV., 15 1 ?S t 12 —// —_ ___ — — — _ I I •,,wer i HOWARD W.YOVNO•N LS NO 45099 �LAt0f 5 --- -- - - - ---- _ 51,15DIVISION MAP x HAROLD R. REEVE B SONS,,INC. - - -- --- t I I:•wnNoxnY CSAs1N c BASIN at Mattltuck,Town of Southold Na oex n POLr PPE Suffolk County,New York o _ - -- -—- —w 0 4J V PRELIMINARY ROAD E DRAINAGE PLAN S I —HI- POOL 5 _ Govntu Tox Map —I 1000 x°I-140 B«.OI w1 6 y V I .000 P51 PRLLAST _ _4 cdrxtE e0K ws 77/A/EIdV _ BY 9.Fr0.[ MAe PREPARED JAN.OD,2015 DA -- DATUM£/.EV •"°''00 I '� Te�cavt Rocord of Rev151on5 -3 _ p ,JI�1 p RECORD OF REVISIONS DATE a0 - - S r ny mg h4I m� mm m� of Pi 111 Olp` mP or O❑❑ me a o0 nn em Sm nm ^,0 yrm �a •°m_ �m mu1 �a �m ®Oa m 4+50 4+00 3+.50 3+00 2+50 2+00 1+50 1+00 0+50 f 0+00 I D2 G E LS 1111 12 LS V L' D APR 2 0 2015 CL PROFILE GREEK VIEW LANE PRIVATE ROAD SECTION NTS pUnninp OmrG5c 1o°A55HOWN 2 ^ P+ SJOB NO]012-0269 calp Horiz 1'=50' Soulnom sown D•no+wdr xr ■•w�Pa r Pa v •or>c Ter ♦•crux rasa Vcdt 1'= 5' DWG 2012_0265-p -plot 2 OF 2 2 July 2015 f `� , .. Attn: Southold Planning Board JUL - 2 2015 Southold Town Hall Annex _ PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 ., _- :,. ,,��. RE: Reeves & Sons Subdivision and Rezoning Application, Tax Map# 1000-140-1-6 Dear Members of the Planning Board, We are writing you for two main reasons: 1) To request that the public comments portion of this process be kept open for an additional 30 days, and 2) If that is not granted for some reason, to try our best to share our concerns and those of our neighbors from what we can gather in such a short period of time. First, let us say that we know that the Reeves have been upstanding members of the community and this immediate neighborhood for a long time. We even purchased our Maiden Lane home from a member of the Reeves family years ago. So we're not trying to be disrespectful or cause the Reeves any trouble. But just as they are looking out for,their best interests,their rights and protect the investment in their property, so are we.And it is our hope that by having an open and informed -exchange of ideas and concerns, the end result will be the best outcome for all in the neighborhood. Extension of Public Comments Period We received notice of this process in a registered letter on Friday, June 27 and a sign posted on the property in question on the same date. While we have come to learn that just one week's notice of the public hearing is the Town's requirement, we feel that we are at an extreme disadvantage. First, because of the timing of this hearing just after the July 4th holiday many neighbors are away on vacation. Second, and perhaps most importantly, this notice left us with just four business days to try to review the application and try to find a lawyer to also review the information and try to explain it all to us. In looking at the application form, it is timed stamped February 18, 2014. To us outsiders to the process, this appears to mean that the applicant has been working with the Town Planning Dept. for over 16 months on reviewing and addressing the information in this application and we've been given just four days to do the same. That doesn't seem right and doesn't give us time to look at all of the issues and provide meaningful comments, the very purpose of this preliminary hearing. In addition, it is our understanding that this is not just an usual, run-of-the-mill application for a subdivision. It is much more complicated because it also would require two zone changes within the parcel. So this is hardly something the average person to look at and fully understand and express a position in just a few days. So we asked that the period of public comment be kept open for an additional 30 days so that we may have time to fully review the application, submit our concerns and questions, have the Planning Board and the applicant address those issues and, if there are changes to the plan as a result of these points, have the time to review the changes and comment on those. Page 2 Our Concerns If for some reason you deny our request for an extension, we've tried to quickly put together some key concerns in the short time we've had. They include: 1. The proposed expansion of the business area to the north, running next to three residential lots to the east and three residential lots to the west. 2. A lack of information about the type of business planned for this lot and how it would impact the neighborhood in terms of traffic, noise, hours of operation, night time lighting, etc. 3. Some strange information provided on the Environmental Impact Statement. 4. The Town's position that a street light is needed at the end of the proposed cul-de-sac. 5. How the unknown business' septic system and those of the three proposed building lots will affect the water of the creek for all of us. 6. How all of these changes will affect our property values. Let us briefly comment on each of these. Expansion of Business Area and Zone Change We've come to understand that the current "B" zone has several more possibly intense uses than the proposed "LB"zone. But increasing the size of the business lot by four times is worrisome. Instead of a small roadside business, what will we be facing and living next to?Will this mainly residential area begin to look like CR-58 in Riverhead?As the property extends north to six adjoining residential lots, what safeguards will be required so that this doesn't adversely affect the quality of life of these neighbors? What Type of Business is Being Considered? Not only do we have little time to go over a lot of information, we also have few details to go over. What type of business is planned for the expanded lot?A woodworking or machinery shop would be _ 'loud in operation and in any materials storage yard.A professional or office building could loom over the surrounding residential homes. Without this information, how are we or the Town supposed to speak intelligently about this and come to an informed decision on how this application will affect the neighborhood?The applicant may not want to go through the formal and costly process of producing detailed plans at this time since so much is still up in the air but we should be told what their intentions are from whether they are looking to build out the property or are looking to sell it off. That also concerns us because while the Reeves have been good neighbors, if this is intended to prepare the property for sale how can we know the new owners will be as caring? The Environmental Impact Statement Again, with little time to fully review the file and understand it all, some things caught our attention. For example, on this form one question was: Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)? It was answered, "Yes,"whited out, then checked as, "No."We are confused. If there is no intention of building on the re-zoned and expanded lot, then why go through this process? But if there is to be a new building on this lot, then this and several following questions were not answered appropriately. Again,, if we don't know what the applicant intends to do with the property, how can we get complete and honest answers about the environmental impacts? Page 3 Street Lights We live on a private road—Maiden Lane. We have no street lights. The application says that the proposed cul-de-sac will be a private road. However, the Town is asking for a street light at the end of the cul-de-sac. Why?Why should the neighbors closest to this light be subject to a light all night long. We moved here to get away from the city and bright lights. Why should this one project require a street light especially since lighting of whatever business is built will be another issue? Septic Systems Again, there are so many unknowns. How big will the business be on the expanded lot?What type of business will be there-a "wet" business? How will that large septic system affect neighboring systems and the health of the creek? How will septic systems of three creek-front homes affect the health of the creek. We've been told that because of the proximity to the creek, the liquids going into a standard septic system on this property can get into the creek in just weeks or months. There is no cleansing this deep in the inlet from tidal flushing. So how will this expansion of the business and the added home affect the health of an already impaired waterway? Shouldn't there be a requirement that any business or residence to be built here must use one of the new hi-tech nitrogen removal systems for the benefit of the creek? Property Values Between living next to a larger business and small residential development and all that it may bring — noise pollution during the day (and possibly at night depending on the type of business going there), light pollution at night, creek pollution from the septic systems, more traffic in and out of the business, and more—it is safe to assume that our property values will decrease. By how much we are not able to assess in this short time frame. But it will certainly be harder to sell our home in the future. So while the applicant is asking for changes in zoning that will increase the value of his investment, the result is a marked decrease in the value of our investment. That doesn't seem right. We need and deserve protections, too. Possible Solutions Again, we have not had ample time to fully review and understand all that is proposed. We are not necessarily for or against the plan at this time. But based on our brief examination of the plan, we would like to submit these thoughts in response. 1. If the re-zoning and expansion of the business lot is approved, there should be a 30-foot buffer of existing and planted tress and bushes along the east and west property lines adjoining neighboring residential homes in order to block the view of the new building and to reduce any light pollution from the property. 2. A similar but smaller 15-foot buffer of existing and planted trees should be required along the western residential lot, especially if the Town requires the street lamp. 3. The business should be required to turn off all exterior lights after 10 PM. 4. The cul-de-sac not be required to have a street lamp. 5. All business and residential buildings should be required to install new hi-tech nitrogen removal systems because of their location so near the creek. C/ V Page 4 Conclusion These are our thoughts, maybe not well thought out or presented because of the time issue. We hope that you will grant the requested extension.And we also hope that the applicant will come forward and share with the Board and the neighbors the plans for the expanded and re-zoned business lot to help calm fears.to help us better understand the true impacts on the neighborhood and our properties, and to help us all come up with reasonable solutions to address any concerns for the benefit of all. This letter has been signed by the following: , SIGNATURE �� "//G PRINTED NAME mos✓ �- ' ��� �� ADDRESS ' clL SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME - ADDRESS SIGNATURE ����� �` " PRINTED NAME/��— C ADDRESS /t / 9s SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME ADDRESS ��_� 0� 1��� . &y qs 2 SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME ��,� � ADDRESS SIGNATURE GL¢ PRINTED NAME ADDRESS l [,` Irl i C k4m SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME e,94li5r�,�� ADDRESS SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME(,�j�vy1f ADDRESS SIGNATURE�� — PRINTED NAME �rv`t�t� v + CJ04714, ADDRESS /(- &6,r i CC: Southold Town Board Southold Town Trustees `T CA- 'L� Page 4 Conclusion These are our thoughts, maybe not well thought out or presented because of the time issue. We hope that you will grant the requested extension.And we also hope that the applicant will come forward and share with the Board and the neighbors the plans for the expanded and re-zoned business lot to help calm fears.to help us better understand the true impacts on the neighborhood and our properties, and to help us all come up with reasonable solutions to address any concerns for the benefit of all. This letter has been signed by the following: SIGNATURE `zI/V,V� PRINTED NAME zj ,r� ADDRESS /Q ��� 'G i1 STs"1�QOV_ k'j L SIGNATURE �:V PRINTED NAME Mc 0dc%Z5k-fi '(Y�-2 ADDRESS 'll�� '' �� SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME ADDRESS /Z�fj SIGNATURE {�yc PRINTED NAM /iI�r2 5�/� �'� �1 � ✓ ADDRESS -55-y SIGNATURE � n� PRINTED NA_IUIE�� ,_ L. ADDRESS SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME ADDRESS Irk-{-J L4 SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME ADDRESS 5�3-C?C> RO J4,--- L/ .�1'Y 1 CC: Southold Town Board Southold Town Trustees J Page 4 Y', Conclusion These are our thoug'ljts',,'ma-y'be,nolt,W611:th6ught,o6t�'6r,',oresenied"'b'e'c'aUse,o Wj f t'e't' h ime"issue: e ... ....... hope that-you,',v�ill,'dff'lntlhetrequested-ektension-,And"W.e also hojod,that th'e�ipplicari,tyi ;cbrrie forward.and, the,nbig h or e b6rs,t-he plan I s1 the expanded an-,re-zone busines-s'Iot,tb-`6e'.Ip-',.-q,airf ffear!§,.tb-,,help',Ljs',b6tter'O nd erstand,,Ahe,true:impacts on,the,J�66jgh66"bdb-`' '-z - to.'help'- ' h �­u�'all corhb-.up,rt",rea�sQqabib'soibt�6hs to,address�-anycqnqerns or�� and our the benbfitot-,'6It-,, , .......... '6d-'b' lowing: This letter, GiedntisiO6 yth'eJol 4 ',has', T LJ R L SIGNA PRINTED NAM IF 5 P6, O,k, ADDRESS.,.',, SIGN A-f OR E PRINTED NAME: ^5r6'3 7 Sal ADDt CDu+�'i' =t :` '$,�..Ph;r3aN.;r }�°' �hvtCKa'' :SIGNATURE,-.:-:y, -F. PRINTED.` AbDRESS,l ADDRESS- SIGNATURE.- Pik T 16N4 z 'p- S "YORE- '-'P R I N T E D,,N A M E "s PF I ' IA . . .. .......... CC: -'5 6d-#N`6 fa!",T:ow WTrustees' _ - 42- v�4, 4 %) t"' ,t�:,',,r"' ':t,'�>,�;V r a4{'-a U... ,.y w�''^t s'SaY'-w sll''s k."t :. -F.� '- -0, A C. SOF SO�P,y John M. Bredemeyer III,President Town®l® Town Hall Annex 4375 Main Road Michael J. Domino,Vice-President F. 5P.O. Box 1179 James F. King,Trustee Southold, New York 11971-0959 Dave Bergen, Trustee Q Charles J. Sanders, Trustee Telephone (631) 765-1892 I'®U � Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Alyxandra Sabatino, Planner Planning Board FROM: John M. Bredemeyer III, Presid Southold Town Board of Trus e DATE: June 12, 2015 RE: Proposed Standard Subdivision for Harold R. Reeve & Sons 1605 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-140-1-6 In response to your memo regarding the above mentioned property, the Board of Trustees performed a field inspection on June 10, 2015. Regarding the landward limit of tidal wetlands as shown on the subdivision map prepared by Young & Young, last revised on January 8, 2015, the Board has determined that it appears to be accurate. The Board of Trustees have 100' of jurisdiction from the landward edge of tidal wetlands, as well as the underwater lands of Mattituck Creek. The Board of Trustees do not require permits to subdivide a property, however, if any clearing of trees/vegetation or structures (e.g. shed, fence, pool, dwelling, dock) were to be proposed within the jurisdictional area, a permit would be required from this office. Due to the shallowness of this branch of Mattituck Creek and restrictions in Chapter 275 of the Town Code, marine construction may be severely restricted or prohibited. The Board of Trustees appreciates the opportunity to review the above mentioned application. John Bredemeyer, President g13FF01,f� Town Hall Annex Michael J. Domino, Vice-President 54375 Route 25 James F. King ti P.O. Box 1179 Charles J. Sanders s Southold, NY 11971 Dave Bergen y�'oi ,�, ya°! Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Work Session Report Date/Time: Jo-) /0 /vim L 5't-16 Southold Town Planning Dept. on behalf of HAROLD R. REEVE & SONS STANDARD SUBDIVISION request a Site Inspection for a confirmation of the wetland line; and if any permits will be required, and as per the site plan received on June 8, 2015. Located: 1605 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck. SCTM# 140-1-6 � A r�c1 Type of area to be impacted: � � �; le_- Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay c-� Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: Chapt.275 Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: Wetland Coastal Erosion Amendment Administrative Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Notice of Hearing card posted on property: Yes �No Not Applicable Storm Water Management Review: Yes No Not Applicable I reedsd- \ Modifications: ��gw'5 �� �' �' r"S Conditions: Present Were: J. Bredemeyer Domino I/J. King C. Sanders D. Bergen Bay Constables Other Form filled out in the field by Mailed/Faxed to: Date: T n�, 3 �d Y 7 A ° A ' O e30, ♦ yr ya ` f c IPA <0 ♦ ' '° Os( (O 9 is 45 5P M1° OPO ,"b Y i ^p0 5 'S 15 as s r- 3 � N I31jNOTICE N COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © E u °" SOUTHOLD SECTION NO Real Property Tax Sam-Agency r e ed 140 Danesu �-.,-..... -. ...� :';^y;�� ,•---- "..r v.._ _____ 1690 �I • - - � V � - _ __ __ �M TO: Alyxandra Sabatino, Planner Planning Board FROM: John M. Bredemeyer III, President Southold Town Board of Trustees DATE: June 11, 2015 RE: Proposed Standard Subdivision for Harold R. Reeve & Sons 1605 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-140-1-6 In response to your memo regarding the above mentioned property, the Board of Trustees performed a field inspection on June 10, 2015. Regarding the landward limit of tidal wetlands as shown on the subdivision map prepared by Young & Young, last revised on January 8, 2015, the Board has determined that it appears to be accurate. The Board of Trustees have 100' of jurisdiction from the landward edge of tidal wetlands, as well as the underwater lands of Mattituck Creek. The Board of Trustees do not require permits to subdivide a property, however, if any clearing of trees/vegetation or structures (e.g. shed, fence, pool, dwelling, dock) were to be proposed within the jurisdictional area, a permit would be required from this office. The Board of Trustees appreciates the opportunity to review the above mentioned application. 1� r 3 z' � � ! MAILING ADDRESS: PL ANNING BOARD MEMBERSrjf S 0 P.O.Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSIU Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS rss Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY 54375 State Route-25 JAMES H.RICH III (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR CUNT I, Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM JUN 8 2015 To: John Bredemeyer, President /% Southold Town Board of Trustees (-A-5 From: Alyxandra Sabatino, Planner Date: June 8, 2015 Re: Request for Review on: Proposed Standard Subdivision for Harold R. Reeve and Sons Located on the n/s/o County Road 48, approximately 190' w/o Wickham Avenue, in Mattituck SCTM#1 000-140-1-6 The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and certification, if applicable. Further, the Planning Board requests the following to be included in-your response: I. Trustee Permits, if any, that are required for this subdivision application. 2. Confirmation of the wetland line. This proposal is a Standard Subdivision of a 14.94 acre parcel into eight lots where Lot 1 equals 0.83 acres inclusive of 0.04 acres of unbuildable lands; Lot 2 equals 0.85 acres inclusive of 0.05 acres of unbuildable lands; Lot 3 equals 1.13 acres inclusive of 0.26 acres of unbuildable lands; Lot 4 equals 0.70 acres; Lot 5 equals 0.66 acres; Lot 6 equals 0.70 acres; Lot 7 equals 0.73 acres; and Lot 8 equals 8.72-acres of Open Space and 0.05 acres of unbuildable lands, located in the R-80 Zoning District. This property includes a proposed road totaling 0.54 acres. Thank you for your cooperation. To View in Laser Fiche: Planning Dept.; Applications; Standard Subdivisions; Pending; 1000-140-1-6